Superior Drilling Products Annual Report 2015

FY2015 Annual Report · Superior Drilling Products

Loading PDF…

2015 ANNUAL REPORT

Superior Drilling Products, Inc. is an innovative, cutting-edge drilling tool technology company
providing cost saving solutions that drive production efficiencies for the oil and natural gas drilling
industry. We design, manufacture, repair, sell and rent drilling tools. Our drilling solutions include
the patented Drill-N-Ream® well bore conditioning tool and the patent-pending Strider™ Drill String
Oscillation System. In addition, we are a manufacturer and refurbisher of PDC (polycrystalline
diamond compact) drill bits for a leading oilfield services company. We operate a state-of-the-art
drill tool fabrication facility, manufacturing custom products and solutions for our drilling industry
customers.

Our strategy is to leverage our technological expertise in drill tool technology and innovative,
precision machining to broaden our drill tool technology offerings for rent or sale, while operating
an effective sales and logistics infrastructure through which we can provide proprietary tools to
exploration and production companies, oilfield services companies and rental tool companies.

Selected Financial Data

(in thousands, except per share data)

2015

2014

2013

Year Ended December 31,

Revenue

Cost of revenue

Selling, general and administrative

Depreciation and amortization

Operating (loss) income

Operating margin

Net (loss) income

Weighted AVG loss per share – diluted

$ 12,706

$ 20,037

$ 11,923

6,618

7,014

4,819

(13,547)

(106.6)%

$ (14,456)

$ (0.83)

7,016

8,103

3,240

1,678

4,855

2,168

1,207

3,692

8.4%

31.0%

$ (621)

$ 3,668

$ (0.04)

N/A*

Weighted AVG shares outstanding – diluted

17,347

13,831

Cash and cash equivalents

Accounts receivable

Total assets

Total debt

Total liabilities

$ 1,297

$ 5,792

$ 11

1,861

38,755

20,250

22,580

4,403

57,543

23,871

27,477

2,979

20,761

19,781

20,504

Total stockholders' equity

$ 16,175

$ 30,066

$ 257

* Information not comparable for the year ended December 31, 2013 as a result of the reorganization of the Company on

May 22, 2014.

Dear Fellow Shareholders,

The headlines were dominated by the changing dynamics of the energy industry in 2015, driven by
the paradigm shift in the market price of oil. Lower oil prices resulted in a drop in the North America
rig count of over 60% during the year and this continued into 2016. The rig count hit a low of 404 in
May 2016, its lowest recorded level since Baker Hughes began tracking it 67 years ago.

We were consumed in 2015 with cost cutting efforts while facing the severe headwinds of market
contraction. To ensure we could
survive and that our tools would
be recognized for the game-
changing technology they bring to
the industry, we had to reassess
our strategy.

As a result, we restructured how
we go to market, shifting away
from the rental tool business
model to focusing on our core
strengths of designing,
engineering, and manufacturing
innovation to support today's top
operators’ efficiency requirements
and goals. For sales, we engaged
established channel partners with large market penetration, strong customer relationships and,
especially important during a weak market, partners that were already approved as suppliers by the
majority of operators. This enabled us to eliminate the costly sales structure we had established,
measurably reducing our cash requirements to a monthly break-even point of $1 million of revenue.

Since the end of 2015, we entered into two channel partner agreements. In January 2016, we entered
into an agreement with Baker Hughes, who will market and rent our StriderTM Drill String Oscillation
Tool as a part of their bottom hole assembly package. During the year, we worked with Baker Hughes
to develop the size tool best suited for their customers that could operate in a variety of drilling fluid
compositions in addition to brine-based fluids for which the tool was originally designed. The larger
diameter tool, which is named Strider Big D, also addresses the opportunities in open-hole monobore
wells, expanding its applications.

We also partnered with Drilling Tools International, Inc. (“DTI”) in 2016, to be the exclusive distributor
marketing our flagship tool, the Drill-N-Ream®, to the U.S. and Canada onshore and offshore drilling
market. The agreement required minimum tool purchases, which they have already surpassed.
In order to maintain exclusivity, DTI is also required to achieve defined, increasing levels of market
penetration through to the end of 2020.

While establishing our new channels to market, we also were focused on our balance sheet and
liquidity. Over the last 18 months, we renegotiated the sellers note used to purchase the Drill-N-Ream
tool in 2014 three times. As part of the most recent negotiation, the seller, who was a co-inventor in the
tool, accepted 700,000 shares as payment on $1 million in principal. Only interest is due in 2017, as
we gain traction with our new tools and DTI makes progress gaining market share for the Drill-N-Ream.
The note was also extended so that the final payment is due in 2020. We issued 5.75 million shares in
a public offering completed in October 2016 and raised net proceeds of $5.1 million, which has paid
down approximately $2.5 million in debt and is funding our growth working capital requirements.

Superior Drilling Products is an innovator that helps its customers

drive down the cost of oil and gas production. We will continue to innovate

and bring new technologies to market.

While 2015 and 2016 have truly put us all to the test in the Oilfield Service industry, we believe we
are the stronger for it. Superior Drilling Products is an innovator that can help drive down the cost
of oil and natural gas production. Our tools are making step-change performance improvements for
operators and the market has turned sufficiently that the industry is open to the adoption of these
technologies. We will continue to innovate and bring new technologies to market. I hope you share
in my excitement about the future for our Company.

Sincerely,

Troy Meier
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2016

Drill-N-Ream®

StriderTM

SEC FORM 10-K

This page intentionally left blank.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015
or

[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number 001-36453
___________

SUPERIOR DRILLING PRODUCTS, INC.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Utah
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

1583 South 1700 East
Vernal, Utah
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

46-4341605
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

84078
(Zip Code)

Issuer's Telephone Number: 435-789-0594

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Title of each class:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value

Name of each exchange on which registered:
NYSE MKT

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act. [ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section
15(d) of the Exchange. [ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
[X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate
Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§
229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-
accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer 

Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) 

Accelerated filer 
Smaller reporting company 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
[ ] Yes [X] No

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of June 30, 2015 was approximately $23,395,929. The registrant had issued and
outstanding 17,459,605 shares of its common stock on March 30, 2016.

Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2016
annual meeting of stockholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
within 120 days after December 31, 2015, are incorporated by reference to the extent set forth in Part III
of this Form 10-K.

PART I

ITEM 1.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 4.

PART II

ITEM 5.

ITEM 6.

ITEM 7.

ITEM 7A.

ITEM 8.

ITEM 9.

ITEM 9A.
ITEM 9B.

PART III

ITEM 10.

ITEM 11.
ITEM 12.

ITEM 13.

ITEM 14.

PART IV

ITEM 15.

SUPERIOR DRILLING PRODUCTS, INC.
FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015

BUSINESS
PROPERTIES
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
OTHER INFORMATION

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
EXHIBIT INDEX
SIGNATURES

6
32
32
33

45
52
76

76
77

78
78

79
79
87

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes certain statements that may be deemed to be “forward-
looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”). Statements contained in all parts of this document that are not historical facts are forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties that are beyond the control of Superior Drilling Products,
Inc. (the “Company” or “SDPI”). You can identify the Company’s forward-looking statements by the
words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “project,” “believe” and similar expressions, or by the
Company’s discussion of strategies or trends. Although the Company believes that the expectations
reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, no assurances can be given that these
expectations will prove to be correct. These forward-looking statements include the following types of
information and statements as they relate to the Company:

• future operating results and cash flow;

• scheduled, budgeted and other future capital expenditures;

• working capital requirements;

• the availability of expected sources of liquidity;

• the introduction into the market of the Company’s future products;

• the market for the Company’s existing and future products;

• the Company’s ability to develop new applications for its technologies;

• the exploration, development and production activities of the Company’s customers;

• compliance with present and future environmental regulations and costs associated with

environmentally related penalties, capital expenditures, remedial actions and proceedings;

• effects of pending legal proceedings;

• changes in customers’ future product and service requirements that may not be cost effective or

within the Company’s capabilities; and

• future operations, financial results, business plans and cash needs.

These statements are based on assumptions and analyses in light of the Company’s experience and
perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors the
Company believes were appropriate in the circumstances when the statements were made. Forward-
looking statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties that could significantly
impact expected results, and actual future results could differ materially from those described in such
statements. While it is not possible to identify all factors, the Company continues to face many risks and

uncertainties. Among the factors that could cause actual future results to differ materially are the risks and
uncertainties discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this report and the following:

the pending Baker Hughes merger;

fluctuations in our operating results;


the volatility of oil and natural gas prices;

the cyclical nature of the oil and gas industry;
 consolidation within our customers’ industries;
 competitive products and pricing pressures;
 our reliance on significant customers, specifically, Baker Hughes;

 our limited operating history;

 our dependence on key personnel;
 costs of raw materials;
 our dependence on third party suppliers;
 unforeseen risks in our manufacturing processes;

 our ability to successfully manage our growth strategy;
 unanticipated risks associated with, and our ability to integrate, acquisitions;
 current and potential governmental regulatory actions in the United States and regulatory actions

the need for skilled workers;

and political unrest in other countries;

terrorist threats or acts, war and civil disturbances;

 availability of financing, flexibility in restructuring existing debt and access to capital markets;

 our ability to protect our intellectual property;


 breaches of security in our information systems;

related party transactions with our founders; and

risks associated with our common stock.

impact of environmental matters, including future environmental regulations;
implementing and complying with safety policies;

Many of such factors are beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict. Any of the factors,
or a combination of these factors, could materially affect the Company’s future results of operations and
the ultimate accuracy of the forward-looking statements. Management cautions against putting undue
reliance on forward-looking statements or projecting any future results based on such statements or present
or prior earnings levels. Every forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular
statement, and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statement.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Nature of Operations

PART I

Superior Drilling Products, Inc. (the “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”) is a drilling and completion
tool technology company. We are a designer and manufacturer of new drill bit and horizontal drill string
enhancement tools for the oil, natural gas and mining services industry an innovative, cutting-edge
refurbisher of PDC (polycrystalline diamond compact) drill bits. All of the drilling tools that we rent or
sell are manufactured by us. Our customers are engaged in domestic and international exploration and
production of oil and natural gas directly, or indirectly as service support or distribution. We were
incorporated on December 10, 2013 under the name SD Company, Inc. in order to facilitate (a) the
reorganization of the entities that are now our consolidated subsidiaries and (b) the subsequent acquisition
of Hard Rock Solutions, LLC (“HR”). We changed our name from SD Company Inc. to Superior Drilling
Products, Inc. on May 22, 2014 in conjunction with closing of that reorganization and our initial public
offering which occurred on May 23, 2014 (“Offering” or “IPO”). Our corporate headquarters and
manufacturing operations are located in Vernal, Utah. Our common stock trades on the NYSE MKT
exchange under the ticker symbol “SDPI”.

Our subsidiaries include (a) Superior Drilling Solutions, LLC (previously known as Superior
Drilling Products, LLC), a Utah limited liability company (“SDS”), together with its wholly owned
subsidiary, Superior Design and Fabrication, LLC, a Utah limited liability company (“SDF”), (b) Extreme
Technologies, LLC, a Utah limited liability company (“ET”), (c) Meier Properties Series, LLC, a Utah
limited liability company (“MPS”), (d) Meier Leasing, LLC, a Utah limited liability company (“ML”) and
(e) HR.

Overview

We currently have three basic operations:

 Our PDC drill bit refurbishing and manufacturing service,
 Our emerging technologies business that manufactures the Drill N Ream well bore conditioning
tool, Strider Oscillation system, and custom drill tool products to customer specifications, and
 Our new product development business that conducts our research and development, and designs
our new completion bits, horizontal drill string enhancement tools, other down-hole drilling
technologies, and drilling tool manufacturing technologies.

From our headquarters in Vernal, Utah, we operate a technologically-advanced PDC drill bit
refurbishing facility, as well as a state-of-the-art, high-tech drilling and completion tool engineering
design and manufacturing operation. We manufacture our drill string enhancement tools, including the
patented “Drill N Ream” well bore enhancement tool and Strider Oscillation system, and conduct our
new product research and development from this facility. We believe that we continue to set the trend
in oil and gas drill bit and drill string tool technology and design.

Our co-founder, Troy Meier, developed the first commercially-viable process for refurbishing PDC
drill bits after a successful 13-year career with a predecessor of our largest client, Baker Hughes. For the
past 20 years, we have exclusively provided our PDC drill bit refurbishing services for the Rocky
Mountain, California and Alaska regions of Baker Hughes’s substantial oil field operations. In addition,
we have expanded our offerings and our customer base by demonstrating our engineering, design and
manufacturing expertise of down-hole drilling tools. We continuously work with our customers to
develop new products and enhancements to existing products, improve efficiency and safety, and solve
complex drilling tool problems. We employ a senior work force with special training and extensive
experience related to drill bit refurbishing and tooling manufacture. They produce our products and
services using a suite of highly technical, purpose-built equipment, much of which we design and
manufacture for our proprietary use. Most of our manufacturing equipment and products use advanced,
patent-pending technologies that enable us to increase efficiency, enhance drill bit integrity, and improve
safety.

The Company reports as a single segment. The Company’s revenues are derived from five (5)
products or service groups, manufacturing, refurbishing, repairs, rental of tools and sales of tools. As
these related revenue sources are to a single industry, the Company has determined to report as a single
segment.

Oil and Gas Drilling Industry

Overview

Drilling and completion of oil and gas wells are part of the oilfield services group within the energy
industry. The drilling industry is often segmented into the North American market and the International
market. These markets share common exposure to the same macro environment, but also exhibit unique
factors that drive the dynamics of each market.

Oilfield services companies drill the wells for hydrocarbon exploration and production (“E&P”)
companies. Demand for onshore drilling is a function of the willingness of E&P companies to make
operating and capital expenditures to explore for, develop and produce hydrocarbons. When oil or natural
gas prices increase, E&P companies generally increase their capital expenditures, resulting in greater
revenues and profits for both drillers and equipment manufacturers. Likewise, as discussed below under
“– Trends in the Industry,” significant decreases in the prices of those commodities typically lead E&P
companies, as we have seen in recent months, to reduce their capital expenditures, which decreases the
demand for drilling equipment.

Most oil and gas operators do not own their own rigs and instead rely on specialized rig contractors to
provide the rig and the crew. Drilling contractors typically provide the rig and the operating crews to E&P
companies on a day-rate basis. In the U.S., drilling contracts are normally by well or a short-term period
(e.g., 90 days). Internationally, the contracts are normally one to three years. International contracts are
longer because the E&P company usually owns a larger field and the mobilization costs are prohibitive
for anything less than a one-year term.

Drill Bits

Historical. The first drill bits used in the oil drilling industry were “fish tail” bits that were relatively
durable, but very slow. In 1909, Howard Hughes Sr. patented the first two-cone rotary bit. In 1931, two
Hughes engineers invented the “Tricone”, a roller cone drill bit with three cones. The Hughes patent for
the Tricone bit lasted until 1951, after which other companies made similar bits. By the early 1980s, the
PDC fixed cutter drill bit had gained market traction. PDC fixed cutter bits have no rolling cones or other
moving parts. Instead they have ridges studded with synthetic black diamond “cutters” or PDCs, and
drilling occurs due to shearing the rock as the bit is rotated by the drill string. The vast majority of drilling
today is with PDC bits.

Hybrid Drill Bit — Cutting Mechanics. Today’s modern hybrid drill bit combines the Tricone roller
configuration with PDC fixed cutter framework. These hybrid bits provide “rolling torque” management:
the dual action cutting structures balance down-hole dynamics for greatly enhanced stability, bit life, and
drilling efficiency. Baker Hughes is a leader in hybrid bit technology and is utilizing our capabilities to
grow this business.

Trends in the Industry

We believe that the following trends will affect the oilfield drilling industry, and consequently the

demand for our products in the coming years.

Declining Rig Count; Industry Volatility. Our business is highly dependent upon the vibrancy of the
oil and gas drilling operations in the U.S. During the latter half of 2014 and throughout 2015, oil prices
dramatically declined in the United States and as a result, the number of operating drilling rigs began to
be reduced. Worldwide military, political and economic events have contributed to oil and natural gas
price volatility and are likely to continue to do so in the future. For example, the NYMEX-WTI oil price
has recently been as low as $26.68, while the NYMEX-Henry Hub natural gas price has recently been as
low as $1.83 per MMBtu. Per Baker Hughes weekly rotary rig count has now decreased over 70% from
the high of 1,840 as of December 24, 2014 to 489 as of March 4, 2016. 2015 was a very challenging year
for us as we worked to expand the market share with our Drill N Ream tool and introduce the Strider tool
against these massive headwinds.

For 2016, we expect the continued decline in the oil and gas industry to be sustained until the pricing
of oil stabilizes around the world, providing greater certainty for our customers and their capital
investment plans. Our drill bit refurbishment business has decreased for our exclusive customer due to
the drop in drilling activity for that business, which has impacted our pricing and volume of repairs, even
though this client is a leading supplier of drill bits to the oil & gas exploration and production industry
globally. We believe the value of our Drill N Ream and Strider tools and our low market penetration
provide us sales opportunities despite these current market conditions. Our plan is for the tool rental sales
to help offset the decline in our PDC drill bit refurbishment business and our third party manufacturing
services business.

Advent of horizontal drilling requires new technologies. The oil and gas industry is increasingly using
directional (e.g., horizontal) drilling in their exploration and production activities because of measurably
improved recovery rates that can be achieved with these methods. With the rise of this type of drilling,
traditional drill string tools used for vertical drilling do not necessarily provide the best performance or
are not well suited for directional drilling. We believe that with our extensive knowledge and experience

in the oilfield industry we can identify these challenges and design and develop tools that will help our
customers with their drilling challenges. Further development of drill string components, such as our Drill
N Ream and Strider tools, will become increasingly important to our business as we continue to grow
through both organic expansion and strategic acquisitions.

We believe that our Drill N Ream and Strider tools are well suited for horizontal drilling activity. In
addition, we are developing additional technologies to take advantage of the oil and gas industry’s
significant shift to horizontal drilling and its resulting need for new horizontal drill string tools and
technology.

Our Drill Bit Refurbishment and Manufacturing Business

As the refurbishing industry grew, our arrangement with Baker Hughes is an agreement to perform our
drill bit refurbishment work exclusively for Baker Hughes’ Rocky Mountain region and points west,
including the significant oil-producing states of California and Alaska. Today, we believe that we continue
to lead the industry in drill bit repair technology – continually improving repair techniques to improve
drill bit performance and efficiency.

Halliburton to Acquire Baker Hughes. During 2014, Halliburton announced its planned acquisition of
Baker Hughes. Currently Baker Hughes is our sole customer for our bit refurbishment business and we
do not know how this acquisition may impact our business. Despite this, we intend to continue developing
our long-time relationship with Baker Hughes. During the month of January 2016, the Company entered
into an agreement with Baker Hughes to supply the Strider tool and related services to Baker Hughes.

Our Horizontal Drilling Tools

Drill N Ream Well Bore Conditioning Tool. The Drill N Ream is a dual-section reaming tool which
is located behind the bottom hole assembly (BHA) to smooth and slightly enlarge the well drift in the
curved and horizontal sections of horizontal wells, in both oil and water based mud. The Drill N Ream
is available in multiple sizes and can be custom manufactured to fit any hole size. The Drill N Ream tool
conditions the well bore and allows the drill string to move through a conditioned well bore left by the
drill bit with less friction and material stress, extending the horizontal distance that can be drilled during
a run and making tripping (removal of the drill string) and the running of casing in the completed well
much easier. Each time a drilling operator has to trip the drill string and replace a bit or other drill string
component, it costs the operator substantial time and money, so we believe anything that allows each run
to extend further is of great value to our customers. We are also developing a suite of other horizontal
drill string tools, each of which addresses a different technical challenge presented by today’s horizontal
drilling designs.

The Drill N Ream tool conditions the well bore tortuosity brought about from the drill bit geo-steering,
and from directional drilling overcorrections and formation interactions. As a result, the Drill N Ream
extends the horizontal distance of the well bore by (a) smoothing out ledges and doglegs left by the bit,
which allows the drill string to move through a conditioned well bore with less friction and stress, (b)
reducing tool joint damages and trip time (i.e. the time required to pull up and resend the drill string), and
(c) enhancing the power available to drive the drill bit assembly.

Specifically,

 We expect that our field sales and tool distribution organization that we have developed will
support the Drill N Ream rental revenue, subject to limits on our business resulting from the
decrease in oil and gas market in 2016.

 The Drill N Ream tool is specifically designed to reduce the drill string stress and downtime, and

therefore the cost, of drilling a horizontal well.

 We believe that the Drill N Ream’s adoption and continued use by operators supports it
effectiveness and industry acceptance. In addition, we understand that a number of customers
have rented the Drill N Ream tool after first trying its competitors. We expect the above factors
to support increasing interest in, and revenues from, the Drill N Ream over the next several years
as more well operators are (a) contacted by our larger sales force, and (b) reports of its effectiveness
are transmitted through word-of-mouth by an increasing user base to other well operators.

Strider Drill String Oscillation System (“Strider”). The Strider utilizes its unique patent-pending
design to reduce drill string friction on horizontal wells, resulting in improved rates of penetration and
cost savings. Its revolutionary engineering provides a cost-effective alternative to conventional downhole
vibration tools. Strider is designed to help dissipate the inertial drag of a horizontal drill string by
generating rhythmic pulses that break the frictional connection between the drill strings and well bore
greatly enhancing drilling rates.

 The Strider tool is composed of two main parts, a hydraulic channeling chamber (HCC) and a
rhythmic pulsation chamber (RPC). The RPC contains a precisely engineered, high speed
pulse-valve that systematically restricts flow area. During flow restriction, or “closure”, the
ideal amount of fluid is allowed to continue down hole. This perfectly controlled hydraulic
flow produces an optimal pulse frequency of three thrusts per second, which is preferred for
bottom hole assembly equipment. The low frequency also allows for placement of the Strider
tool to the bit closer than typical oscillation tools.

We believe that our Strider tool is at the forefront of drill string tool technological development for
horizontal drilling. We believe our technology in the drill string stimulation tool offers significant
advantages over our competitors and we believe our Strider tool will be rapidly accepted in the drilling
market.

During the month of January 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Baker Hughes to

supply the Strider tool and related services to Baker Hughes. Tool shipments associated with the
agreement are expected to begin during the first quarter of 2016. The agreement has no set expiration
date or minimum shipment requirement. It will remain in force until it is canceled by either us or Baker
Hughes, as stipulated in the agreement.

V-Stream advanced conditioning system (“V-Stream”). The V-Stream tool is an integral spiral blade
stabilizer and is engineered to combine stabilization with reaming. A cavity or plenum in the middle of
the blades facilities enhanced fluid flow for cuttings transport and reduces torque when compared to

typical stabilizers with similar overall blade length. Non-active cutters at gauge enable the V-Stream to
remove formation and condition the hole while controlling deviation. With these unique features, the V-
Stream will stabilize the BHA and condition the hole simultaneously to optimize the drilling operations.

Dedicated Reamer Stinger (“DR Stinger”). DR Stinger is designed to optimize dedicated reamer

operations. DR Stinger utilized our fully patented Drill-n-Ream tool with its dual stage eccentric
reamers which conditions well bores by increasing well bore drift. The two reamer stages spaced
approximately five feet apart act in unison to force each other into the formation while efficiently
reducing ledges, doglegs, and well bore tortuosity. With DR Stinger, a tapered stinger is placed just
below the Drill-n-Ream tool at the end of the drill string. The DR Stinger eliminates any bit costs
during the reamer operation as it is run without a bit, offering a much better indication of hole
conditions. Floats are included in the DR Stinger, as well as an anti-plug port system with both of these
features eliminating any plugging of the drill string. With no bit on the DR Stringer, the drill string will
find and keep well bore center preventing unplanned side tracks.

New Product Development and Intellectual Property

Our sales and earnings are influenced by our ability to provide the high-level service that our customers
demand successfully, which in turn relies on our ability to develop new processes, technology, and
products. We have also historically dedicated additional resources toward the development of new
technology and equipment to enhance the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the products and services
we provide. During 2015, research and development costs were approximately $1.2 million, but for 2016,
we expect that it will decrease due to the company’s focus on increasing revenue from our existing
commercial products and cost cutting measures from the slowdown of the oil and gas industry.

Although we highly value our proprietary products and technology, we also depend on our
technological capabilities, customer service oriented culture, and application of our know-how to
distinguish ourselves from our competitors. We also consider the services we provide to our customers,
and the technical knowledge and skill of our personnel, to be more important than our registered
intellectual property in our ability to compete. While we stress the importance of our research and
development programs, the technical challenges and market uncertainties associated with the development
and successful introduction of new and updated products are such that we cannot assure investors that we
will realize any particular amount of future revenue from the services and related products resulting from
our research and development programs.

Suppliers and Raw Materials

We acquire supplies, component parts, products and raw materials from suppliers, including steel
suppliers, foundries, forge shops and original equipment manufacturers. The prices we pay for our raw
materials may be affected by, among other things, energy, industrial diamond, steel and other commodity
prices, tariffs and duties on imported materials and foreign currency exchange rates. Certain of our
component parts, products or specific raw materials are only available from a limited number of suppliers.

Our ability to obtain suitable quality raw materials and components, such as PDC’s, steel and flux,
solder and heating elements, is critical to our ability to remanufacture Baker Hughes drill bits, and to
manufacture the Drill N Ream and Strider tool and other future drill line products. In order to purchase
raw materials and components in timely and cost effective manner, we have developed both domestic and
international sourcing connections and arrangements. We maintain quality assurance and testing
programs to analyze and test these raw materials and components in order to assure their compliance with
our rigorous specifications and standards. We generally try to purchase our raw materials from multiple
suppliers so we are not dependent on any one supplier, but this is not always possible.

Because Baker Hughes pays the cost of direct materials and supplies used in our drill bit refurbishing
process, cost increases are not as critical as short-term financial components for that line of business.
However, the price and availability of commodities and components, in particular steel, can have an
impact on our operations. We have no assurance that we will be able to continue to purchase these raw
materials on a timely basis or at historical prices.

Proprietary Rights

We rely primarily on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws,
confidentiality procedures, and other intellectual property protection methods to protect our proprietary
technology. Mr. Meier currently has U.S. patent applications pending, and related international patent
applications pending as co-inventor, and individually with respect to the Strider and other pending
horizontal drilling tools. There is no assurance that our patent applications will result in issued patents,
that the existing patents or that any future patents issued to us will provide any competitive advantages
for their products or technology, or that, if challenged, the patents issued to us will be held valid and
enforceable. Despite our precautions, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products
or obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Existing intellectual property laws afford
only limited protection and policing violations of such laws is difficult. The laws of certain countries in
which our products are or may be used by our customers do not protect our products and intellectual
property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. There is no assurance that these
protections will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar technology,
gain access to our trade secrets or other proprietary information, or design around our patents.

We may be required to enter into costly litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights or to defend
infringement claims by others. Such infringement claims could require us to license the intellectual
property rights of third parties. There is no assurance that such licenses would be available on reasonable
terms, or at all.

Marketing and Sales

We do not engage in any marketing or sales efforts for our PDC drill bit refurbishing in the oil and gas

industry because we are under an exclusive contract with Baker Hughes for those services.

For the Drill N Ream and Strider tool, sales and marketing infrastructure was established by creating
“stocking points” where tool inventory can be maintained and modestly repaired. We also established a
sales and marketing team comprised of “city sales” and “field sales” employees. Our recent sales and
marketing history with the Drill N Ream tool has been largely in North Dakota’s Bakken oil field, Utah,

Oklahoma, Wyoming, Montana, New Mexico, Colorado and Texas. Our plan is to expand the Drill N
Ream tool’s coverage by targeting a substantially expanded sales and marketing effort in Ohio, and
Pennsylvania, among other areas.

Our Strider tool agreement with Baker Hughes provides an acceptance in the market for this tool. The
Strider tool has been deployed in North Dakota’s Bakken oil field, Oklahoma and Wyoming, with the goal
to expand to other surrounding states in the near future.

Growth Strategies

We intend to pursue the following growth strategies as we seek to expand our market share and
solidify our position as a competitive drilling and completion tool manufacturer in the drilling and
completion industry:

 Leverage of Hard Rock. We have grown Hard Rock’s marketing team, which has more than 25
years of oil field customer contacts, with our Team’s extensive connections in the drilling industry,
in order to achieve greater market penetration and revenues for the Drill N Ream tool. We have
used the Hard Rock marketing and sales team to propel our upcoming drill string component
products successfully into the drilling marketplace and have taken that expertise to grow a larger
sales and marketing force.

 Leverage the Strider tool. We will use the Hard Rock marketing and sales team as our sales force
for Strider. The Strider tool addresses a niche opportunity in the oil and gas production market
place because of the technological advancements in its design as well as the efficiencies developed
in its production. The sales group will be able to sell both the Drill N Ream and Strider tool, as
they can both be on the same drill string. We will also leverage our Baker Hughes agreement to
increase our market penetration.

 Continue to enhance our Baker Hughes relationship. We have now added our Strider tool
agreement to our drill bit refurbishing business with Baker Hughes. We will continue to develop
our long-time relationship with Baker Hughes and look for other ways partner with them.

 Strengthen and support our employees. Our experienced employees and management team are
our most valuable resources. Attracting, training, and retaining key personnel, has been, and will
remain critical to our success. To achieve our goals, we intend to remain focused on providing
our employees with training, personal and professional growth opportunities, as well as adding
performance-based incentives, including opportunities for stock ownership, and other competitive
benefits. We are also working with the local university and high school to develop and teach local
programs in machining and engineering expertise and technical resources.

 Seek strategic acquisitions to enhance or expand our product lines. While capital constraints and
careful capital allocation discipline requires investment in organic growth, we are continually
looking to find new technologies to add to our arsenal of tools for the exploration and production
industry. In analyzing new acquisitions, we intend to pursue opportunities that complement our
existing product line and/or that are geographically situated and served by our current and future
sales force. We believe that strategic acquisitions will enable us to exploit economies of scale in

the areas of finance, human resources, marketing, administration, information technology, and
legal, while also providing cross-marketing opportunities among our drill tool product offerings.

Competitive Strengths

We believe that we differentiate ourselves from our competitors on the basis of the quality and
reliability of our products and services, our proprietary technology, and our ability to rapidly respond with
products that meet the most demanding needs of our customers.



Industry-recognized expertise and innovation. We believe that we have developed a strong
reputation for producing quality products and services based upon our industry-recognized
depth of experience, ability to attract and retain quality employees, and innovative processes
and applications. We believe that a number of the drill bit refurbishing processes and
technologies that we developed have now become industry standards.

 Experienced management team with proven track record. Our executive officers and senior
operational managers have extensive experience both with us and in the oil field service
industry generally. Our chief executive officer and co-founder, Troy Meier, has a 33-year
relationship with Baker Hughes, providing innovative ideas to support Baker Hughes in
maintaining their leadership role in the drill bit industry. Meier family entities continue to own
the majority of our outstanding stock which we believe aligns their interests with the interests
of our public investors.

 Cutting-edge manufacturing capacity and proprietary technology. We have created and
designed a cutting-edge machining facility with custom features. We recruited and hired a high
level, cross-industry machining team to produce our products and services using a suite of
highly technical, computer controlled, purpose-built equipment, much of which we design and
manufacture for our proprietary use. Most of our manufacturing equipment and products now
use advanced, patent-pending technologies that enable us to increase efficiency, enhance the
integrity and precision drill bit and drill string tool integrity, and improve safety.

Competition

Drill Bit Refurbishing. The primary competitors for our drill bit refurbishing services are the in-house
units at Hughes Christensen, the division of Baker Hughes responsible for drill bits. Other drill bit
manufacturers also have in-house refurbishing units, but they are not our competitors because of our
exclusive contract with Baker Hughes.

Drilling Enhancement Tools. The primary competitors for our Drill N Ream tool are several single-
section reaming tool manufacturers, including Baker Oil Tools (a division of Baker Hughes), NOV, and
Schlumberger. We believe that the Drill N Ream tool is the only patented dual-section or dual cutting
structure drill string reamer on the market today. We believe that distinction will allow us to continue
building on the Drill N Ream tool’s first-mover advantage.

We believe that our Strider tool is at the forefront of drill string tool technological development for
horizontal drilling. There are existing tools that would compete with the drill string stimulation tool, such
as the Agitator tool marketed by NOV. However, we believe our technology in the drill string stimulation
tool offers significant advantages over the Agitator and we believe our Strider tool will be rapidly accepted
in the drilling market.

Customers

Distributor/Agent Relationships and Customer Diversification. With the expansion of our tool
offerings, we have increased our customer base as well as our sales infrastructure and our channels to
market. We recently established an agreement with Baker Hughes to be a market channel partner for new
customers of our Strider tool. We are also working on additional prospective channel partners. By
increasing our capabilities and renting or selling products to our customers, we have diversified our
customer base and sources of revenue. Our manufacturing technologies operations also provide us
diversification opportunities as we can design and manufacture to customer specifications new
technologies under development.

Drill Bit Refurbishing. Our sole customer for our drill bit refurbishing services is Hughes Christensen,
the division of Baker Hughes responsible for drill bits, under our exclusive long-term contract with them.
We work directly with their field engineers, manufacturing and marketing representatives to develop new
products and enhancements, improve efficiency and safety, and solve complex drilling tool problems.

Drill String Tools. E&P operators, other oil field services companies and distributors are demanding
key technologies, such as advanced directional drilling and more complex completion systems in order to
reduce costs resource requirements and tie to production. We believe that there will be significant
opportunities to bring new products and equipment to market, such as our Drill N Ream and Strider tools,
that have been designed and engineered with these new challenges in mind.

Seasonality

A substantial portion of our business is not significantly impacted by changing seasons. A small
portion of the revenue we generate from selected operations may benefit from higher first quarter activity
levels, as operators take advantage of the winter freeze to gain access to remote drilling and production
areas. In the past, some of our revenue in Alaska has declined during the second quarter due to warming
weather conditions that resulted in thawing, softer ground, difficulty accessing drill sites and road bans
that curtailed drilling activity.

Environmental, Health and Safety Regulation

Our operations are subject to numerous stringent and complex laws and regulations governing the
discharge of materials into the environment, health and safety aspects of our operations, or otherwise
relating to human health and environmental protection, and we have put a strong focus on these issues.

We designed and built our Vernal facility as a fully-contained business park, except for the city sewer
connection. Underlying our entire facility, including parking lots and runoff storage areas, is a complete
capture and containment field that collects all building drainage and ground run off in isolated tanks.

Captured drainage and runoff, as well as all hazardous waste generated in our manufacturing processes is
regularly removed from our facility by a certified hazardous waste disposal company. However, the trend
in environmental regulation has been to impose increasingly stringent restrictions and limitations on
activities that may impact the environment, and thus, any changes in environmental laws and regulations
or in enforcement policies that result in more stringent and costly waste handling, storage, transport,
disposal, or remediation requirements could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial
position. Moreover, accidental releases or spills of regulated substances may occur in the course of our
operations, and we cannot assure you that we will not incur significant costs and liabilities as a result of
such releases or spills, including any third-party claims for damage to property, natural resources or
persons. Failure to comply with these laws or regulations or to obtain or comply with permits may result
in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, imposition of remedial or corrective
action requirements, and the imposition of orders or injunctions to prohibit or restrict certain activities or
force future compliance.

The following is a summary of the more significant existing environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations to which our business operations are subject and for which compliance could have a material
adverse impact on our capital expenditures, results of operations or financial position.

Hazardous Substances and Waste. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and
comparable state statutes, regulate the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, disposal and cleanup
of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes. Under the auspices of the EPA, the individual states administer
some or all of the provisions of RCRA, sometimes in conjunction with their own, more stringent
requirements. We are required to manage the transportation, storage and disposal of hazardous and non-
hazardous wastes in compliance with RCRA.

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), also
known as the Superfund law, imposes joint and several liability, without regard to fault or legality of
conduct, on classes of persons who are considered to be responsible for the release of a hazardous
substance into the environment. These persons include the owner or operator of the site where the release
occurred, and anyone who disposed or arranged for the disposal of a hazardous substance released at the
site. We currently own, lease, or operate numerous properties that have been used for manufacturing and
other operations for many years. We also contract with waste removal services and landfills. These
properties and the substances disposed or released on them may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA and
analogous state laws. Under such laws, we could be required to remove previously disposed substances
and wastes, remediate contaminated property, or perform remedial operations to prevent future
contamination. In addition, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file
claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by hazardous substances released into
the environment.

Water Discharges. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (the “Clean Water Act”) and analogous
state laws impose restrictions and strict controls with respect to the discharge of pollutants, including spills
and leaks of oil and other substances, into waters of the United States. The discharge of pollutants into
regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of a permit issued by the EPA or an
analogous state agency. A responsible party includes the owner or operator of a facility from which a
discharge occurs. The Clean Water Act and analogous state laws provide for administrative, civil and
criminal penalties for unauthorized discharges and, together with the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, impose

rigorous requirements for spill prevention and response planning, as well as substantial potential liability
for the costs of removal, remediation, and damages in connection with any unauthorized discharges.

Employee Health and Safety. We are subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations,
including OSHA and comparable state statutes, establishing requirements to protect the health and safety
of workers. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard, the EPA community right-to-know
regulations under Title III of the federal Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act and comparable
state statutes require that information be maintained concerning hazardous materials used or produced in
our operations and that this information be provided to employees, state and local government authorities
and the public. Substantial fines and penalties can be imposed and orders or injunctions limiting or
prohibiting certain operations may be issued in connection with any failure to comply with laws and
regulations relating to worker health and safety.

There is no assurance that any present or future noncompliance with Environmental Laws will not have
a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition. See “Risk
Factors.”

Insurance and Risk Management

We maintain insurance coverage of types and amounts that we believe to be customary and reasonable
for companies of our size and with similar operations. In accordance with industry practice, however, we
do not maintain insurance coverage against all of the operating risks to which our business is exposed.
Therefore, there is a risk our insurance program may not be sufficient to cover any particular loss or all
losses.

Currently, our insurance program includes, among other things, general liability, umbrella liability,
sudden and accidental pollution, personal property, vehicle, workers’ compensation, directors and officers
and employer’s liability coverage. Our insurance includes various limits and deductibles or retentions,
which must be met prior to or in conjunction with recovery.

Employees

As of December 31, 2015, we had 66 full-time employees compared with 95 full-time employees at
the same time in December 2014. We generally have been able to locate and engage highly qualified
employees as needed. None of our employees are covered by an ongoing collective bargaining agreement,
and we have experienced no work stoppages. We consider our employee relations to be good.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

In this Item 1A. the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” and the “Company” used herein refer to Superior

Drilling Products, Inc. and its subsidiaries unless otherwise indicated or as the context so requires.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

An extended decline in expenditures by the oil and gas industry has reduced and will continue to
significantly reduce our revenue and income and resulted in an impairment of our other assets.

Our business depends upon the condition of the oil and gas industry and, in particular, the
willingness of oil and gas companies to make capital expenditures on exploration, drilling and
production operations. The level of capital expenditures is generally dependent on the prevailing view of
future oil and gas prices, which are influenced by numerous factors affecting the supply and demand for
oil and gas, including:

 worldwide economic activity;



the level of exploration and production activity;

interest rates and the cost of capital;

 environmental regulation;



federal, state and foreign policies regarding exploration and development of oil and gas;

the ability of OPEC to set and maintain production levels and pricing;

 governmental regulations regarding future oil and gas exploration and production;



the cost of exploring and producing oil and gas;

the cost of developing alternative energy sources;

the availability, expiration date and price of leases;

the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves;

the success of drilling for oil and gas in unconventional resource plays such as shale formations;

technological advances;

 weather conditions.

We expect continued volatility in both crude oil and natural gas prices, as well as in the level of

drilling and production related activities. Even during periods of high prices for oil and natural gas,
companies exploring for oil and gas may cancel or curtail programs, seek to renegotiate contract terms,
including the price of our products and services, or reduce their levels of capital expenditures for
exploration and production for a variety of reasons. These risks are greater during periods of low or
declining commodity prices. Continued significant or prolonged declines in hydrocarbon prices have
had, and may continue to have, a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Failure to generate sufficient revenue to make payments on the Hard Rock Note could result in our
loss of the patents securing the Hard Rock Note.

Under the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Hard Rock Note, we are required to make

the following payments (plus accrued interest): $500,000 on January 15, 2016, $1,500,000 on July 15,
2016, $500,000 on each of January 15, March 15, May 15 and July 15, 2017, $500,000 on each of
January 15, March 15, May 15 and July 15, 2018, and $1,000,000 on each of January 15, March 15,
May 15 and July 15, 2019. The Second Amended and Restated Hard Rock Note matures and is fully
payable on July 15, 2019.

The Second Amended and Restated Hard Rock Note is secured by all of the patents, patents
pending, other patent rights, and the Drill-n-Ream trademark purchased by HR from the holder of the
Amended and Restated Hard Rock Note (the “Drill-n-Ream Collateral”). If we do not have the funds
necessary to make the future payments under the Second Amended and Restated Hard Rock Note and fail
to make any payments as required thereunder, the holder of the Second Amended and Restated Hard Rock
Note could conduct a foreclosure sale on the Drill-n-Ream Collateral in order to apply the proceeds thereof
toward repayment of the Second Amended and Restated Hard Rock Note and all foreclosure costs, and
Superior Drilling Solutions, LLC would be liable for any shortfall or receive any excess from the sales
proceeds. The failure to retain the Drill-n-Ream Collateral could cause a significant loss of our investment
and might have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation, as well as our
ability to grow our drill string tool business.

Due to reduced commodity prices and lower operating cash flows, coupled with pending payments
required on our indebtedness, we may be unable to maintain adequate liquidity and our ability to
make payments in respect of our indebtedness could be adversely affected.

At December 31, 2015, we had negative working capital of approximately $0.2 million. During
2015 our principal sources of liquidity were cash flow from operations. Our principal uses of cash are
operating expenses, working capital requirements, capital expenditures, and repayment of debt. Given the
current environment of the oil and gas industry, we anticipate revenues will decline in 2016, however, due
to the addition of our Strider tool, this new revenue will offset some of the anticipated decrease. The
Strider revenue will come from the efforts of our sales team along with additional sales from the Baker
Hughes agreement to provide the Strider tools to their customers.

Our operational and financial strategies include lowering our operating costs and capital spending
to match revenue trends, managing our working capital and manage our debt to enhance liquidity. On
March 8, 2016, the Company entered into a financing agreement with Federal National Commercial Credit
(“FNCC”) in the amount $3 million. The financing agreement includes a $500,000 term loan
collateralized with previously unencumbered manufacturing equipment and the remaining balance is a
$2.5 million accounts receivable revolving credit facility allowing up to 85% of eligible accounts
receivable.

During 2016, we plan on using the cash flows from operations to fund debt repayment. Also, we
will renegotiate the Hard Rock Note, to postpone debt repayment dates and/or convert debt to common
shares. To further conserve cash, we have implemented a salary for stock options program for senior
management and board of directors during the 1st quarter of 2016. Based on our current expectations, our
additional financing agreement with FNCC and assuming we are successful in restructuring the Hard Rock
Note, we believe that our available cash will be sufficient to fund our operations, capital expenditures and
debt payments.

In the event we are not successful, the Company will be looking to the public equity and debt market
as a way to obtain further financing during the next 12 months, including our Founders selling their
common shares. As part of this plan, on March 24, 2016, the Company filed a registration statement in
preparation of looking to the public market if the need arises. With this plan in place we believe that our
sources of liquidity, including cash flow from operations, existing cash, and cash equivalents and

renegotiation of certain debt obligations will be sufficient to meet our projected cash requirements for at
least the next 12 months.

Although as a public company we have access to the public markets for capital raises, we cannot
provide any assurances that financing will be available to us in the future on acceptable terms or at all. If
we cannot raise required funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to, among other things, (i)
maintain or decrease our general and administrative expenses depending on market demands for our
products and services; (ii) fund certain obligations as they become due; and (iii) respond to competitive
pressures or unanticipated capital requirements.

Our level of indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our
operations, limit our ability to react to changes in our business or our industry and place us at a
competitive disadvantage.

We are required to make payments on the Hard Rock note of $2 million each year over the next
three years and $4 million for 2019. In addition, we are required to make monthly payments of $39,317
on our note with American Bank of the North.

Based on current forecasts we will need to restructure debt obligations, raise additional capital

through equity and/or debt financings. As previously noted we are considering several options to
address this situation, but there is no guarantee that we will be successful at raising the needed funds.

Our debt could have important consequences. For example, it could (i) increase our vulnerability to

general adverse economic and industry conditions, (ii) limit our ability to fund future capital
expenditures and working capital, to engage in future acquisitions or development activities, or to
otherwise realize the value of our assets and opportunities fully because of the need to dedicate a
substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, (iii) increase our cost of
borrowing, (iv) restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or causing us to make non-strategic
divestitures, (v) limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business or industry in
which we operate, placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors who are less
leveraged and (vi) impair our ability to obtain additional financing in the future.

Our customers’ industries are undergoing continuing consolidation that may impact our results of
operations.

The oil and gas industry is rapidly consolidating and, as a result, some of our largest customers
have consolidated and are using their size and purchasing power to seek economies of scale and pricing
concessions. This consolidation may result in reduced capital spending by some of our customers or the
acquisition of one or more of our primary customers, which may lead to decreased demand for our
products and services. For example during 2014, Halliburton announced its acquisition of Baker Hughes.
Currently Baker Hughes is our sole customer for our bit refurbishment business and we do not know how
this acquisition may impact our business. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our level
of sales to a customer that has consolidated or replace that revenue with increased business activity with
other customers. As a result, the acquisition of one or more of our primary customers, such as Baker
Hughes, may have a significant negative impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash
flows. We are unable to predict what effect consolidations in the industry may have on price, capital

spending by our customers, our selling strategies, our competitive position, our ability to retain customers
or our ability to negotiate favorable agreements with our customers.

We may be unable to successfully compete with other manufacturers of drilling equipment.

Several of our competitors are diversified multinational companies with substantially larger
operating staffs and greater capital resources than ours and which have been engaged in the manufacturing
business for a much longer time than us. If these competitors substantially increase the resources they
devote to developing and marketing competitive products and services, we may not be able to compete
effectively. Similarly, consolidation among our competitors could enhance their product and service
offerings and financial resources, further intensifying competition.

Our customer base is concentrated and the loss of, or nonperformance by, one or more of our
significant customers could cause our revenue to decline substantially.

We contract exclusively with Baker Hughes, a multinational organization, for our entire drill bit

remanufacturing business, and most of our original equipment drill bit manufacturing business. With
our Drill N Ream rental and repair business, we have three large customers that equaled 40% of our total
revenue for 2015. It is likely that we will continue to derive a portion of our revenue from a relatively
small number of customers in the future. If a major customer decided not to continue to use our services
or significantly reduces its drilling plans, our revenue would decline and our operating results and
financial condition could be harmed. In addition, we are subject to credit risk due to the concentration
of our customer base. Any increase in the nonpayment of and nonperformance by our counterparties,
either as a result of changes in financial and economic conditions or otherwise, could have a material
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and could adversely affect our
liquidity.

Our operating history may not be sufficient for investors to evaluate our business and prospects.

We are a recently formed company with a short operating history. This may make it more difficult
for investors to evaluate our business and prospects and to forecast our future operating results. As a
result, historical financial data may not give you an accurate indication of what our actual results would
have been if subsequent acquisitions had been completed at the beginning of the periods presented or of
what our future results of operations are likely to be. Our future results will depend on our ability to
efficiently manage our operations and execute our business strategy.

There may be fluctuations in our operating results.

Significant annual and quarterly fluctuations in our results of operations may be caused by, among
other factors, our volume of revenues, the timing of new product or service announcements, releases by
us and our competitors in the marketplace of new products or services, seasonality and general economic
conditions. There can be no assurance that the level of revenues achieved by us in any particular fiscal
period will not be significantly lower than in other comparable fiscal periods. We believe quarter-to-
quarter comparisons of our revenues and operating results are not necessarily meaningful and should not
be relied on as indicators of future performance. Our operating expenses are relatively fixed in the short

term and are based on management’s expectations of future revenues. As a result, if future revenues are
below expectations, net income or loss may be disproportionately affected by a reduction in revenues, as
any corresponding reduction in expenses may not be proportionate to the reduction in revenues.

We must continue to develop new technologies, methodologies and products on a timely and cost-
effective basis to satisfy the needs of our customers.

The drilling industry is driven primarily by cost minimization, and our strategy is aimed at
reducing drilling costs through the application of new drill bit assembly and drill string tool technologies.
Our continued success will depend on our ability to meet our customers’ changing needs, on a timely and
cost-effective basis, by successfully enhancing our current products and processes; developing, producing
and marketing new products and processes; and responding to evolving industry standards and other
technological changes.

We cannot assure you that our products will be able to satisfy the specifications of our customers
or that we will be able to perform the testing necessary to prove that the product specifications are satisfied
in the future, or that the costs of modifications to our products to satisfy their requirements will not
adversely affect our results of operations. Failure to meet our customer’s demand for services may
adversely affect our business. We may encounter resource constraints, competition, or other difficulties
that may delay our ability to expand our bit remanufacturing services to the level desired or required by
our customer. If our products are unable to satisfy such requirements, or we are unable to perform any
required testing, our customers may cancel their contracts and/or seek new suppliers, and our business,
results of operations, cash flows or financial position may be adversely affected.

We are dependent on key personnel who may be difficult to replace.

Our success is dependent to a significant degree upon the business expertise and continued
contributions of our founders and senior management team. In particular, we are dependent upon the
efforts and services of our founders, Mr. Troy Meier, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Ms.
Annette Meier, our President, because of their knowledge, experience, skills, and relationships with major
clients and other members of our management team, as well as the other members of our executive team.
Although we have employment arrangements certain members of senior management, as a practical
matter, those agreements will not assure the retention of our employees and we may not be able to enforce
all of the provisions in any such employment agreement, including the non-competition provisions. Our
future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate other highly
skilled technical, managerial, marketing and customer service personnel. Competition for such personnel
in is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully attract, integrate or retain
sufficiently qualified personnel. Our inability to retain these types of individuals could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Increases in the cost of raw materials used in our manufacturing processes could negatively impact
our profitability.

We rely on the availability of volume and quality of synthetic diamond cutters for both our
remanufactured drill bit business and for our new drill string tool manufacturing business. In addition,
we must have a reliable source of steel available for our new manufacturing business which is both of
sufficient quality, and available at a cost-effective price. We do not have fixed price contracts or

arrangements for all of the raw materials and other supplies that we purchase. Baker Hughes provides
the diamond cutters for our remanufacturing business. However, sourcing cost-effective supplies of
quality steel in the relatively low volumes that our new tool manufacturing requires can be challenging.
However, shortages of, and price increases for, steel and other raw materials and supplies that we use in
our business may occur. Future shortages or price fluctuations in synthetic diamond cutters or steel
could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct either our remanufacturing business or our
new drill tools in a timely and cost effective manner.

We depend on third-party suppliers for timely deliveries of raw materials, and our results of
operations could be adversely affected if we are unable to obtain adequate supplies in a timely
manner.

Our manufacturing operations depend upon obtaining adequate supplies of raw materials from third

parties. The ability of these third parties to deliver raw materials may be affected by events beyond our
control. Any interruption in the supply of raw materials needed to manufacture our products could
adversely affect our business, results of operations and reputation with our customers.

We may be exposed to unforeseen risks in our product manufacturing and processes, which could
adversely affect our financial conditions and results of operations.

We operate our business from our Vernal manufacturing facilities. A natural disaster, extended
utility failure or other significant event at our facility could significantly affect our ability to manufacture
sufficient quantities of key products or otherwise deliver products to meet customer demand or
contractual requirements which may result in a loss of revenue and other adverse business consequences.
In addition, the equipment and management systems necessary for our operations are subject to wear and
tear, break down and obsolescence, which could cause them to perform poorly or fail, resulting in
fluctuations in manufacturing efficiencies and production costs. Significant manufacturing fluctuations
may affect our ability to deliver products to our customers on a timely basis and we may suffer financial
penalties and a diminution of our commercial reputation and future product orders. Additionally, some
of our business may in the future be conducted under fixed price contracts. Fluctuations in our
manufacturing process, or inaccurate estimates and assumptions used in pricing our contracts, even if due
to factors out of our control, may result in cost overruns which we may be required to absorb. Any shut
down of our manufacturing facility, reductions in our manufacturing process or efficiency, or cost
overruns could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to employ a sufficient number of skilled and qualified workers to sustain or
expand our current operations.

Both of our remanufacturing and new manufacturing lines of business require personnel with
specialized skills and experience. The supply of skilled and experienced personnel may not be sufficient
to meet current or expected demand. Any significant increase in the wages paid by competing employers
could result in a reduction of our skilled labor force, increases in the wage rates that we must pay, or both.
If any of these events were to occur, our capacity could be diminished, our ability to respond quickly to
customer demands or strong market conditions may be inhibited and our growth potential impaired, any
of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.

If we are not able to manage our growth strategy successfully, our business, and results of
operations may be adversely affected.

Our growth strategy includes acquisitions and the development and implementation of new
product designs and improvements, which presents numerous managerial, administrative, operational and
other challenges. Our ability to manage the growth of our operations will depend on our ability to develop
systems and services and related technologies to meet evolving industry requirements and, if so, at prices
acceptable to our customers to compete in the industry in which we operate. Our ability to compete
effectively will also depend on our ability to continue to obtain patents on our proprietary technology and
products. Although we do not consider any single patent to be material to our business as a whole, the
inability to protect our future innovations through patents could have a material adverse effect. In
addition, our growth will increase our need to attract, develop, motivate, and retain both our management
and professional employees. The inability of our management to manage our growth effectively or the
inability of our employees to achieve anticipated performance could have a material adverse effect on
our business.

Acquisitions and investments may not result in anticipated benefits and may present risks not
originally contemplated, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.

Our growth strategy includes acquiring other companies that complement our service offerings or
broaden our technical capabilities and geographic presence. From time to time, we evaluate purchases
and sales of assets, businesses or other investments. These transactions may not result in the anticipated
realization of savings, creation of efficiencies, offering of new products or services, generation of cash
or income or reduction of risk. In addition, acquisitions may be financed by borrowings, requiring us to
incur debt, or by the issuance of our common stock. These transactions involve numerous risks, and we
cannot ensure that:

• any acquisition would be successfully integrated into our operations and internal controls;

• the due diligence conducted prior to an acquisition would uncover situations that could result in

financial or legal exposure;

• the use of cash for acquisitions would not adversely affect our cash available for capital

expenditures and other uses;

• any disposition, investment, acquisition or integration would not divert management resources

from the operation of our business; or

• any disposition, investment, acquisition or integration would not have a material adverse effect

on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Our inability to integrate acquisitions successfully could impede us from realizing all of the benefits
of the acquisitions which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.

If we are unable to successfully integrate Hard Rock or other future acquisitions, we could be
impeded from realizing all of the benefits of those acquisitions and could weaken our business operations.
The integration process may disrupt our business and, if implemented ineffectively, may preclude
realization of the full benefits expected by us and could harm our results of operations. In addition, the
overall integration of the combining companies may result in unanticipated problems, expenses, liabilities
and competitive responses, and may cause our stock price to decline. The difficulties of integrating an
acquisition include, among others:

•

unanticipated issues in integration of information, communications, and other systems;

unanticipated incompatibility of logistics, marketing, and administration methods;

maintaining employee morale and retaining key employees;

integrating the business cultures of both companies;

preserving important strategic client relationships;

coordinating geographically separate organizations; and

consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures and eliminating duplicative operations.

Even if the operations of an acquisition are integrated successfully, we may not realize the full
benefits of the acquisition, including the synergies, cost savings or growth opportunities that we expect.
These benefits may not be achieved within the anticipated time frame, or at all. Failing to realize the
benefits could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Conditions in the global financial system may have impacts on our business and financial position
that we currently cannot predict.

Uncertainty in the credit markets may negatively impact the ability of our customers to finance
purchases of our products and services and could result in a decrease in, or cancellation of, orders or
adversely affect the collectability of our receivables. If the availability of credit to our customers is
reduced, they may reduce their drilling and production expenditures, thereby decreasing demand for our
products and services, which could have a negative impact on our financial position. Additionally,
unsettled conditions could have an impact on our suppliers, causing them to be unable to meet their
obligations to us. Although we do not currently anticipate a need to access the credit markets in the short
term, a prolonged constriction on future lending by banks or investors could result in higher interest rates
on future debt obligations or could restrict our ability to obtain sufficient financing to meet our long-term
operational and capital needs.

A terrorist attack or armed conflict could harm our business.

Terrorist activities, anti-terrorist efforts and other armed conflicts involving the United States or
other countries may adversely affect the United States and global economies and could prevent us from
meeting our financial and other obligations. If any of these events occur, the resulting political instability
and societal disruption could reduce overall demand for oil and natural gas, potentially putting downward
pressure on demand for our services and causing a reduction in our revenues. Oil and natural gas related
facilities could be direct targets of terrorist attacks, and our operations could be adversely impacted if

infrastructure integral to our customers' operations is destroyed or damaged. Costs for insurance and other
security may increase as a result of these threats, and some insurance coverage may become more difficult
to obtain, if available at all.

Materials and minerals used in our manufacturing process may become subject to laws and
regulations that may expose us to significant costs and liabilities.

The diamonds comprising the diamond cutting discs used in our operations are synthetic and
manufactured in the United States, South Africa and China. Neither those diamond cutters nor any other
minerals used in our operations are currently identified as “conflict minerals” in the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. However, we cannot predict or control if the United States
Secretary of State will or will not identify one of the minerals used in our manufacturing process as a
conflict mineral. Should the materials used in our manufacturing process be designated as a conflict
mineral, we will be required to file Form SD with the SEC and conduct the required diligence to determine
the source of the conflict mineral in connection with such disclosure. Any increased costs and expenses
associated with this could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of
operations.

Our success will be affected by the use and protection of our proprietary technology. There are
limitations to our intellectual property rights in our proprietary technology, and thus our right to
exclude others from the use of such proprietary technology.

Our success will be affected by our development and implementation of new product designs and
improvements and by our ability to protect and maintain critical intellectual property assets related to
these developments. Although in many cases our products are not protected by any registered intellectual
property rights, in other cases we rely on a combination of patents and trade secret laws to establish and
protect this proprietary technology.

We currently hold multiple U.S. patents and have multiple pending patent applications for
products and processes in the U.S. and certain non-U.S. countries. Patent rights give the owner of a patent
the right to exclude third parties from making, using, selling, and offering for sale the inventions claimed
in the patents in the applicable country. Patent rights do not necessarily grant the owner of a patent the
right to practice the invention claimed in a patent, but merely the right to exclude others from practicing
the invention claimed in the patent. It may also be possible for a third party to design around our patents.
Furthermore, patent rights have strict territorial limits. Some of our work will be conducted in
international waters and may, therefore, not fall within the scope of any country's patent jurisdiction. We
may not be able to enforce our patents against infringement occurring in international waters and other
“non-covered” territories. Also, we do not have patents in every jurisdiction in which we conduct business
and our patent portfolio will not protect all aspects of our business and may relate to obsolete or unusual
methods, which would not prevent third parties from entering the same market.

In addition, by customarily entering into confidentiality and/or license agreements with our
employees, customers and potential customers and suppliers, we attempt to limit access to and
distribution of our technology. Our rights in our confidential information, trade secrets, and confidential
know-how will not prevent third parties from independently developing similar information. Publicly
available information (e.g. information in expired issued patents, published patent applications, and

scientific literature) can also be used by third parties to independently develop technology. We cannot
provide assurance that this independently developed technology will not be equivalent or superior to our
proprietary technology.

Our competitors may infringe upon, misappropriate, violate or challenge the validity or
enforceability of our intellectual property and we may not able to adequately protect or enforce our
intellectual property rights in the future.

Our businesses and our customers’ businesses are subject to environmental laws and regulations
that may increase our costs, limit the demand for our products and services or restrict our
operations.

Our operations and the operations of our customers are also subject to federal, state, local and
foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of human health and the environment. These
environmental laws and regulations affect the products and services we design, market and sell, as well
as the facilities where we manufacture our products. For example, our operations are subject to numerous
and complex laws and regulations that, among other things, may regulate the management and disposal
of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes; require acquisition of environmental permits related to our
operations; restrict the types, quantities and concentrations of various materials that can be released into
the environment; limit or prohibit operation activities in certain ecologically sensitive and other protected
areas; regulate specific health and safety criteria addressing worker protection; require compliance with
operational and equipment standards; impose testing, reporting and record-keeping requirements; and
require remedial measures to mitigate pollution from former and ongoing operations. We are required to
invest financial and managerial resources to comply with such environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations and anticipate that we will continue to be required to do so in the future. In addition,
environmental laws and regulations could limit our customers’ exploration and production activities.
These laws and regulations change frequently, which makes it impossible for us to predict their cost or
impact on our future operations. For example, legislation to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases has
been introduced in the U.S. Congress, and there has been a wide-ranging policy debate, both nationally
and internationally, regarding the impact of these gases and possible means for their regulation. In
addition, efforts have been made and continue to be made in the international community toward the
adoption of international treaties or protocols that would address global climate change issues, such as
the annual United Nations Climate Change Conferences. Also, the EPA has undertaken new efforts to
collect information regarding greenhouse gas emissions and their effects. Following a finding by the EPA
that certain greenhouse gases represent a danger to human health, the EPA has expanded its regulations
relating to those emissions and has adopted rules imposing permitting and reporting obligations. The
results of the permitting and reporting requirements could lead to further regulation of these greenhouse
gases by the EPA. To date, there has been no significant legislative progress in cap and trade proposals
or greenhouse gas emission reductions. The adoption of legislation or regulatory programs to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions could also increase the cost of consuming, and thereby reduce demand for, the
hydrocarbons that our customers produce. Consequently, such legislation or regulatory programs could
have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. It is too early to determine
whether, or in what form, further regulatory action regarding greenhouse gas emissions will be adopted
or what specific impact a new regulatory action might have on us or our customers. Generally, the
anticipated regulatory actions do not appear to affect us in any material respect that is different, or to any
materially greater or lesser extent, than other companies that are our competitors. However, our business

and prospects could be adversely affected to the extent laws are enacted or modified or other
governmental action is taken that prohibits or restricts our customers’ exploration and production
activities or imposes environmental protection requirements that result in increased costs to us or our
customers.

Environmental laws may provide for “strict liability” for damages to natural resources or threats
to public health and safety, rendering a party liable for environmental damage without regard to
negligence or fault on the part of such party. Sanctions for noncompliance may include revocation of
permits, corrective action orders, administrative or civil penalties, and criminal prosecution. Some
environmental laws and regulations provide for joint and several strict liability for remediation of spills
and releases of hazardous substances. In addition, we may be subject to claims alleging personal injury
or property damage as a result of alleged exposure to hazardous substances, as well as damage to natural
resources. These laws and regulations also may expose us to liability for the conduct of or conditions
caused by others, or for our acts that were in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations at the
time such acts were performed. Any of these laws and regulations could result in claims, fines or
expenditures that could be material to results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Our failure to implement and comply with our safety program could adversely affect our operating
results or financial condition.

Our safety program is a fundamental element of our overall approach to risk management, and
the implementation of the safety program is a significant issue in our dealings with our clients. Unsafe
job sites and office environments have the potential to increase employee turnover, increase the cost of a
project to our clients, expose us to types and levels of risk that are fundamentally unacceptable, and raise
our operating costs. The implementation of our safety processes and procedures are monitored by various
agencies and rating bureaus, and may be evaluated by certain clients in cases in which safety requirements
have been established in our contracts. If we fail to comply with safety regulations or maintain an
acceptable level of safety at our facilities we may incur fines, penalties or other liabilities, or may be held
criminally liable. We may incur additional costs to upgrade equipment or conduct additional training, or
otherwise incur costs in connection with compliance with safety regulations. Failure to maintain safe
operations or achieve certain safety performance metrics could disqualify us from doing business with
certain customers, particularly major oil companies.

Our products are used in operations that are subject to potential hazards inherent in the oil and
gas industry and, as a result, we are exposed to potential liabilities that may affect our financial
condition and reputation.

Our products are used in potentially hazardous drilling, completion and production applications
in the oil and gas industry where an accident or a failure of a product can potentially have catastrophic
consequences. Risks inherent to these applications, such as equipment malfunctions and failures,
equipment misuse and defects, explosions, blowouts and uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas or well
fluids and natural disasters, on land or in deep water or shallow-water environments, can cause personal
injury, loss of life, suspension of operations, damage to formations, damage to facilities, business
interruption and damage to or destruction of property, surface water and drinking water resources,
equipment and the environment. In addition, we provide certain services that could cause, contribute to
or be implicated in these events. If our products or services fail to meet specifications or are involved in

accidents or failures, we could face warranty, contract or other litigation claims, which could expose us
to substantial liability for personal injury, wrongful death, property damage, loss of oil and gas
production, and pollution and other environmental damages. Our insurance policies may not be adequate
to cover all liabilities. Further, insurance may not be generally available in the future or, if available,
insurance premiums may make such insurance commercially unjustifiable. Moreover, even if we are
successful in defending a claim, it could be time-consuming and costly to defend.

In addition, the frequency and severity of such incidents could affect operating costs, insurability
and relationships with customers, employees and regulators. In particular, our customers may elect not to
purchase our products or services if they view our safety record as unacceptable, which could cause us to
lose customers and substantial revenues. In addition, these risks may be greater for us because we may
acquire companies that have not allocated significant resources and management focus to quality, or
safety requiring rehabilitative efforts during the integration process. We may incur liabilities for losses
associated with these newly acquired companies before we are able to rehabilitate such companies'
quality, safety and environmental programs.

Our information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security.

We rely on our proprietary production management technology which has changed how users
connect to our knowledge and other information technology (“IT”) systems to conduct our business.
Despite our security and back-up measures, our IT systems are vulnerable to computer viruses, natural
disasters and other disruptions or failures. The failure of our IT systems to perform as anticipated for any
reason or any significant breach of security could disrupt our business and result in numerous adverse
consequences, including reduced effectiveness and efficiency of our operations and those of our
customers, inappropriate disclosure of confidential information, increased overhead costs, loss of
intellectual property and damage to our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business and results of operations. In addition, we may be required to incur significant costs to prevent
or respond to damage caused by these disruptions or security breaches in the future.

Our related party transactions with the Meiers and their affiliated entities may cause conflicts of
interests that may adversely affect us.

We have entered into, and may, in the future, enter into various transactions and agreements with

the Meiers and their affiliated entities. We believe that the transactions and agreements that we have
entered into with the Meiers are on terms that are at least as favorable as could reasonably have been
obtained at such time from third parties. However, these relationships could create, or appear to create,
potential conflicts of interest when our board of directors is faced with decisions that could have
different implications for us and the Meiers or their affiliates. The appearance of conflicts, even if such
conflicts do not materialize, might adversely affect the public’s perception of us, as well as our
relationship with other companies and our ability to enter into new relationships in the future, which
may have a material adverse effect on our ability to do business.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

As a smaller reporting company, we are subject to scaled disclosure requirements that may make
it more challenging for investors to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects.

Currently, we are a “smaller reporting company,” meaning that our outstanding common stock
held by non-affiliates had a value of less than $75 million at the time of filing of our registration statement.
As a “smaller reporting company,” we are able to provide simplified executive compensation disclosures
in our filings; are exempt from the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requiring that
independent registered public accounting firms provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting; and have certain other decreased disclosure obligations in our
SEC filings, including, being required to provide only two years of audited financial statements in annual
reports. Consequently, it may be more challenging for investors to analyze our results of operations and
financial prospects.

We are an emerging growth company, and any decision on our part to comply only with certain
reduced reporting and disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies could
make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an emerging growth company, and, for as long as we continue to be an emerging growth
company, we may choose to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements
applicable to other public companies but not to “emerging growth companies,” including, but not limited
to, not being required to have our independent registered public accounting firm audit our internal control
over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations
regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the
requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval
of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We could be an emerging growth company
for up to five years following the completion of our initial public offering in May 2014. We will cease to
be an emerging growth company upon the earliest of: (a) the end of the fiscal year following the fifth
anniversary of our initial public offering, (b) the first fiscal year after our annual gross revenue exceed
$1.0 billion, (c) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0
billion in non-convertible debt securities or (d) the end of any fiscal year in which the market value of
our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeded $700 million as of the end of the second quarter of
that fiscal year. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive if we choose to
rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result of any
choices to reduce future disclosure, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and
the price of our common stock may be more volatile.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised
accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. However, we have
elected to adopt new or revised accounting standards at such times as applicable to other non-emerging
grown public companies.

Furthermore, a material weakness in internal controls may remain undetected for a longer period
because of our extended exemption from the auditor attestation requirements under Section 404(b) of
Sarbanes-Oxley.

As long as we are controlled by the Meiers, the ability of our stockholders to influence the outcome
of matters will be limited.

The Meiers continue to own 51% of our outstanding common stock and serve on our Board of Directors.
As long as they have voting control of our company, SDPI will have the ability to take many
stockholder actions, including the election or removal of directors, irrespective of the vote of, and
without prior notice to, any other stockholder. As a result, the Meiers will have the ability to influence or
control all matters affecting us, including:



the composition of our board of directors and, through our board of directors, decision-making
with respect to our business direction and policies, including the appointment and removal of our
officers;

 any determinations with respect to acquisitions of businesses, mergers or other business

combinations and change of control transactions;

 our acquisition or disposition of assets; and
 our capital structure.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile.

The trading price of our common stock and the price at which we may sell common stock in the

future are subject to large fluctuations in response to any of the following:

• limited trading volume in our common stock;

• quarterly variations in operating results;

• general financial market conditions;

• the prices of natural gas and oil;

• announcements by us and our competitors;

• our liquidity;

• changes in government regulations;

• our ability to raise additional funds;

• our involvement in litigation; and

• other events.

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the near future.

We have not paid any dividends in the past and do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common

stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain any earnings for the future operation and
development of our business. In addition, under Utah law no distribution may be made if, after giving it
effect: (a) we would be unable to pay our debts as they come due, or (b) our total assets would be less
than our total liabilities. We can provide no assurance that those restrictions will not prevent us from
paying a dividend in future periods.

We may issue preferred stock whose terms could adversely affect the voting power or value of our
common stock.

Our articles of incorporation authorizes us to issue, without the approval of our shareholders, one
or more classes or series of preferred stock having such designations, preferences, limitations and relative
rights, including preferences over our common stock respecting dividends and distributions, as our board
of directors may determine. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred stock could adversely
impact the voting power or value of our common stock. For example, we might grant holders of preferred
stock the right to elect some number of our directors in all events or on the happening of specified events
or the right to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation
preferences we might assign to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of the common
stock.

Certain provisions in our organizational documents could delay or prevent a change in control.

The existence of some provisions in our organizational documents could delay or prevent a change
in control of our company, even if that change would be beneficial to our shareholders. Our articles of
incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may make acquiring control of our company difficult,
including:

•

provisions regulating the ability of our shareholders to nominate directors for election or
to bring matters for action at annual meetings of our shareholders;
limitations on the ability of our shareholders to call a special meeting and act by written
consent; and
the authorization given to our board of directors to issue and set the terms of preferred
stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

The Company owns four buildings as part of its Vernal offices, which are used for manufacturing
and executive offices. The Company’s management believes its current manufacturing and office facility
is sufficient for its current operations.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are subject to litigation that arises from time to time in the ordinary course of our business
activities. We are not currently involved in any litigation which management believes could have a
material effect on our financial position or results of operations, except as follows:

Property Management, Inc. (p.k.a. Fortuna Asset Management, LLC, ) (“ACF”), (c) Troy and Annette
Meier personally, and several of their family trusts, (d) Meier Family Holding Company, LLC and Meier
Management Company, LLC, and (e) Superior Drilling Solutions, LLC (“SDS”) and Meier Property
Series, LLC (“MPS”). That suit is currently pending in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Uintah County,
Utah under Cause #130800125. Del-Rio filed an Amended Complaint in the lawsuit on April 24, 2015.

Tronco and Del-Rio are the sole owners and managers of Philco. Del-Rio served as the exploration
operator of Philco. Part of the collateral that ACF had for its loan to Tronco loan was Philco’s mineral
leases. ACF’s loan has been fully repaid and ACF’s liens have been removed, and ACF is no longer a
defendant. Del- Rio’s Amended Complaint alleges that defendants made amendments to the Tronco loan
without complying with the voting provisions of Philco’s operating agreement; that all of the Meier-
related entities benefitted from the Tronco loan proceeds; and that ACF’s liens damaged Del-Rio and
Philco, in an unspecified manner. The lawsuit seeks monetary and punitive damages, disgorgement,
prejudgment interest, post judgment interest, costs, and attorney fees, against all defendants, in an amount
to be determined at trial.

We believe that Del-Rio’s claims are without merit, and all defendants are actively defending in
this matter. In particular, SDS’ and MPS’ only involvement was to grant guaranties and/or security
interests in their respective separate personal and real property to ACF to additionally collateralize the
Tronco loan before its purchase by us. In addition, since the Meiers and their personal trusts guaranteed
repayment of the Tronco loan, we believe that the basis of Del-Rio’s damages claims are nullified.
Consequently, we do not believe that Del Rio’s purported claims against SDS and MPS will have any
material adverse effect on our cash flow, business, or operations. As of March 14, 2016, there have been
no decisions on the merits of the claims in the lawsuit.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES

PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK

The Company’s common stock trades on the NYSE MKT market under the symbol “SDPI”. The
following table sets forth the high and low sale prices of our common stock as quoted on the NYSE MKT.

2015

2014

Fiscal quarter ended:
March 31,
June 30,
September 30,
December 31,

High
$ 4.27
$ 3.82
$ 2.80
$ 1.55

Low
$ 2.76
$ 2.75
$ 1.20
$ 0.90

High
N/A *
$ 6.82
$ 7.32
$ 6.04

Low
N/A *
$ 4.49
$ 5.70
$ 3.55

*The Company was not public until May 29, 2014

Approximate Number of Equity Security Holders

As of March 10, 2016 there were 27 stockholders of record and 922 beneficial owners of the

Company’s common stock.

Dividends

The Company does not presently pay dividends on its common stock. The Company intends for

the foreseeable future to continue the policy of not paying dividends and retaining earnings, if any, to
finance the development and growth of its business.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved by security

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)

Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding

options, warrants

and rights
(b)

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)

holders (1) ........................................................................

493,993 (1)

2.36

_1,061,176 (2)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security

holders ............................................................................

Total as of December 31, 2015 ...........................................
_________________
(1) Consists of 86,500 shares under the 2014 Employee Stock Incentive Plan and 407,493 shares under the 2015 Employee Stock Incentive Plan.
(2) Consists of 1,061,176 shares remaining available for future issuance under the 2015 Employee Stock Incentive Plan. The 2014 Employee Stock Incentive
Plan was frozen by the Board of Directors such that no future grants of awards will be made and the 2014 Employee Stock Incentive Plan remains effective
only with respect to awards outstanding as of June 15, 2015 until they expire according to their terms.

_ 493,993 _

1,061,176_

See “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters” for information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31,
2015.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On May 29, 2014 the Company converted debt of $2,000,000 in exchange for 714,286 shares of

the Company’s restricted common stock and 714,286 warrants at an exercise price of $4.00.

On May 22, 2014, the Company issued 5,641,510 shares of its restricted common stock to Meier

Family Holding Company, LLC and 3,173,350 shares of its restricted common stock to Meier
Management Company, LLC.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Trends and Outlook for the Company

The dramatic decline in oil prices has effected most North American exploration and production
companies, which have significantly reduced their exploration and drilling activity in 2015. As a result,
the number of operating drilling rigs nationally has dropped approximately 70% since the beginning of
this year. Our business is highly dependent upon the vibrancy of the oil & gas drilling operations in the
U.S. The reduction in activity has created a more challenging environment in which to market the
Company’s drilling products.

The impact of volume and pricing on our drill bit refurbishment business is especially
pronounced as our exclusive customer for that business is a leading supplier of drill bits to the oil and
gas exploration and production industry globally.

Although the Company has seen demand for its oil and gas related products and services in
North America impacted by these industry conditions, the Company continues to aggressively market its
drilling products. Our current product line of tools includes Drill N Ream tool, V Stream Advance
Stabilization System and Dedicated Reamer Stringer, and the Strider tool.

For our rental tool products, we have had pressure from customers on pricing which has
continued throughout 2015. For 2016, we are hopeful that this pressure will stabilize as the price of oil
stabilizes around the world, providing greater certainty for our customers to understand their operating
costs and margins, as well as their capital investment plans. We believe the value of our Drill N Ream
and Strider tools, as well as our low market penetration, provide opportunities for sales despite market
conditions. However, if we do not have sales as planned, it may have a negative impact on our liquidity.

In late 2014, the industry experienced a significant decline in the price of oil causing an industry-
wide downturn which has continued into 2015. This downturn has impacted the operational plans for oil
companies and consequently has affected the drilling and support service sector. As a result, we have
experienced a negative impact on rental rates and utilization of our rental tools for 2015. With the
addition of our Strider tool and positive feedback from our clients that have used it, we feel the added
revenue from this tool will have a positive impact on our revenue.

During the second quarter of 2015, we completed the renewal of a $5 million loan extending the
term from August 2015 to August 2018. The loan which was renewed was with American Bank of the
North and the collateral on the loan is our corporate offices and manufacturing facilities. We have also
negotiated a second amendment and restatement of the Hard Rock Note, which has decreased our
payments to $2 million annually for 2016 through 2018 and $4 million for 2019. Throughout 2015 the
Company has implemented a series of reductions in staffing and other cost saving measures. We will
continue to monitor the developing oil and gas market and evaluate the need for further cost cutting
measures.

Effective March 8, 2016, the Company announced the completion of a $3 million credit facility,
pursuant to a Loan and Security Agreement among us and certain of our subsidiaries, as the borrowers,
and Federal National Commercial Credit, as the lender. The credit facility is comprised of a two year
$2.5 million accounts receivable revolving promissory note and a $500,000 term promissory note.

The accounts receivable revolving promissory note has availability of up to 85% of eligible
accounts receivable of the borrowers. This note has a variable interest rate of prime plus 1% plus a
monthly service fee of 0.48% of the current outstanding balance on the note.

The term loan is for a period of 60 months with monthly principal payments of $8,333, with a

balloon payment at the end of the term. This note carries an interest rate of prime plus 5% plus a
monthly service fee of 0.30% of the outstanding balance.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table represents our condensed consolidated statement of operations for the periods

indicated:

(in thousands)

Revenue

For the Years Ended December 31,

2015

2014

$12,706 100 % $ 20,037 100 %

Operating costs and expenses

26,253 207 % 18,359 92 %

Income (loss) from continuing operations

(13,547) (107) % 1,678 8 %

Other expense

(1,381) (11) % (1,825) (9) %

Income tax expense (benefit)

(472)

(4) %

474 2 %

Net loss

$ (14,456) (114) % $

(621 ) (3) %

Material changes of certain items in our statements of operations included in our financial

statements for the comparative periods are discussed below.

Revenue. Our revenue decreased approximately $7.3 million, during the twelve months ended
December 31, 2015 compared with the same period in 2014. Manufacturing and refurbishment revenue
decreased by approximately $8.5 million due to an overall decrease in U.S. land drilling activity in 2015
versus 2014 and specific customer demand. The Company received rental tool and repair sales of $7.6
million and $0.2 million tool sales during 2015. During 2014 the Company received Drill N Ream
royalties, rental and repair of $6.4 million and $0.2 million of tool sales.

Operating Costs and Expenses. Total operating costs and expenses increased approximately $7.9

million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 compared with the same period in 2014.

 Cost of revenue decreased approximately $0.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31,
2015 in comparison with the same period in 2014. This decrease is a partial reflection of the
decrease in revenue and our cost cutting measures in 2015.

 Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) decreased approximately $1.1 million for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 compared with the same period in 2014. The
decrease was due primarily to layoffs and other cost saving measures due to the downturn of the
oil industry.

 Depreciation and amortization expense increased approximately $1.6 million primarily
attributable to the depreciation of the Hard Rock assets for the entire year of 2015 compared to
only partial year of 2014.

 As part of the annual review of goodwill, the Company has determined to impair and write-off all
of the goodwill in the amount of approximately $7,803,000 as of December 31, 2015. See Note 1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in our consolidated financial statements included
herein for further discussion of impairment of goodwill.

Other Income (Expenses). Other income and expense primarily consists of rent income, interest

income, interest expense and loss on disposition of assets.

 Other Income. We receive rent from two real property leases: one lease of a building on our Vernal
campus and the second for the lease of the Superior Auto Body facilities by a related party. For
the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, lease payments decreased by approximately
$140,000 as compared with the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, due to a decrease in
rental income from our Vernal property.



Interest Income. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 interest income was
approximately $294,000 and $173,000, respectively, which increase was mainly due to interest
received from the Tronco loan (see Note 9 – Note Receivable - Tronco in our consolidated financial
statements included herein).

Interest Expense. The interest expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
was approximately $1,823,000 and $2,280,000, respectively. Included in the twelve months ended
December 31, 2014 is $250,000 of debt discount from a bridge loan, which was paid in full on
May 29, 2014. Included in interest expense at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was HR debt discount
noncash expense of approximately $567,000 and $527,000, respectively.

Factors Affecting Comparability

We believe that the following selected factors can be expected to have a significant effect on the

comparability of our recent or future results of operations:

Reorganization

In connection with the closing of our initial public offering in May 2014, we completed the
reorganization in which we acquired all of the limited liability company membership interests of SDS,
SDF, ET, MPS, , and ML and, as a result, became the holding company under which those subsidiaries
conduct operations. Each of the subsidiaries is considered to be a historical accounting predecessor for
financial statement reporting purposes.

Hard Rock Acquisition

In May 2014, we purchased 100% of the limited liability company membership interests
of HR (the “Hard Rock Acquisition”), Hard Rock Solutions, Inc.’s (“HRSI”) subsidiary, pursuant to a
membership interest purchase agreement with HRSI. HRSI began operations in 2001 and has been
marketing and renting the Drill N Ream tool since 2011. Prior to the purchase of HR, the Company
received 25% royalty income from the rental sales of the tools. Subsequent to the purchase of HR, the
Company began to receive 100% of the rental income. (See Note 3 in our consolidated financial
statements included herein for further discussion of purchase).

Public Company Expenses

Upon consummation of our initial public offering, we became a public company. Our common
stock is listed on the NYSE MKT. As a result, we must comply with laws, regulations, and requirements
that we did not need to comply with as a private company, including certain provisions of the Sarbanes-

Oxley Act and related SEC regulations, and we also must comply with the requirements of NYSE MKT.
Compliance with the requirements of being a public company will increase our operating expenses in
order to pay our employees, legal counsel, and accountants to assist us in, among other things, external
reporting, instituting, and monitoring a more comprehensive compliance and board governance function,
establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and preparing and distributing periodic public reports in compliance with our
obligations under the federal securities laws. In addition, being a public company makes it more expensive
for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance. We estimate that incremental annual public
company costs will be between $0.5 million and $1 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

maintain or decrease our general and administrative expenses depending on market demands for our
products and services; (ii) fund certain obligations as they become due; and (iii) respond to competitive
pressures or unanticipated capital requirements.

Contractual Obligations

The following table presents our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2015. Our obligations
to make payments in the future may vary due to certain assumptions including the duration of our
obligations and anticipated actions by third parties according to the following table (in thousands):

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Thereafter

Total

Debt (1)

Capital Lease (1)

Operating Leases

$ 4,340

$ 5,234

$ 7,292

$4,591

$ 302

$ 1,234

$ 22,993

387

504

258

159

141

130

645

1,011

Total

$5,231

$5,651

$7,433

$4,721

$379

$1,234

$ 24,649

(1) Amounts represent the expected cash payments of principal amounts associated with our long-term debt and capital lease

obligations.

The aggregate outstanding balance of our notes payable as of December 31, 2015 was

approximately $19.9 million with interest rates ranging from 0% to 8.4%.

Cash Flow

Operating Cash Flows

For the year ended December 31, 2015, net cash provided by our operating activities was
approximately $0.6 million. The Company had approximately $14.5 million of net loss, approximately
$2.5 million decrease in accounts receivable, a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of
approximately $0.5 million, impairment of goodwill of approximately $7.8 million and depreciation and
amortization expense of approximately $4.8 million.

Investing Cash Flows

For the year ended December 31, 2015, net cash used in our investing activities was approximately

$1.2 million used for property, plant and equipment purchases.

Financing Cash Flows

For the year ended December 31, 2015, net cash used by our financing activities was
approximately $3.9 million. Cash used for financing activities was for payments on long-term debt and
long-term capital lease obligations.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

None

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. During the preparation of these
financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses, and related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those discussed below. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances. The results of our analysis form the basis for making assumptions about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. While we believe that the estimates
and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are appropriate, actual
results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, and the impact of such
differences may be material to our consolidated financial statements. Our estimates and assumptions are
evaluated periodically and adjusted when necessary. The more significant estimates affecting amounts
reported in our consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to: revenue recognition,
determining the allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of inventory, and recoverability of long-lived
assets, useful lives used in calculating depreciation and amortization, note receivable - Tronco Loan
Guaranty, and accounting for the HR Acquisition.

Revenue Recognition.

Refurbishing — Refurbishing services are performed in our facilities for Baker Hughes under the

Vendor Agreement. Under the Vendor Agreement, revenue is determined based on a standard hourly
rate to complete the work. Revenue for refurbishing services is recognized as the services are rendered
and upon shipment to the customer. Shipping and handling costs related to refurbishing services are
paid directly by Baker Hughes at the time of shipment.

Manufacturing — Manufactured products are sold at prevailing market rates. We recognize

revenue for these products upon delivery, when title passes, when collectability is reasonably assured
and when there are no further significant obligations for future performance. Typically this is at the time
of customer acceptance. Shipping and handling costs related to product sales are recorded as a
component of both the sales price and cost of the product sold.

Rental income — Our rental tools are priced at competitive rates and the price includes, deliver,

maintenance and pick up services. While the duration of the rents vary by job and number of runs,
these rents are generally less than one month. The rental agreements do not have any minimum
rental payments or term. Revenue is recognized upon completion of the job. The tools are rented
to entities operating in North Dakota, Wyoming, Texas, Montana, Oklahoma, Utah, New Mexico and
Colorado.

Concentration of Credit Risk — Historically, substantially all of our revenue was derived from
our refurbishing of PDC drill bits and our manufacturing of the Drill N Ream units. However, after the

Hard Rock Acquisition, our historical HR revenues and accounts receivable percentages are now spread
out among our current customers and Hard Rock’s customers. In the past, we were dependent on just a
few main customers, primarily Baker Hughes, however, we believe that our purchase of HR and our
development of new products has broadened our customer base, which will have a positive effect on
diversifying our concentration of credit risk in the future. During 2015 Baker Hughes represented 37%
of our total revenue and included in accounts receivable at December 31, 2015 was $0.9 million. During
2014 Baker Hughes was a significant customer representing 60% of our total revenue and included in
accounts receivable at December 31, 2014 was $2.8 million.

Accounts Receivable; Allowance for Doubtful Accounts — Accounts receivable are generally due
within 60 days of the invoice date. No interest is charged on past-due balances. We grant credit to our
customers based upon an evaluation of each customer’s financial condition. We periodically monitor the
payment history and ongoing creditworthiness of our customers. An allowance for doubtful accounts is
established at a level estimated by management to be adequate based upon various factors including
historical experience, aging status of customer accounts, payment history and financial condition of our
customers. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, management determined that no allowance for doubtful
accounts was deemed necessary due to our expectation that the Company will collect all amounts owed.

Segment Reporting – The Company allocates resources and evaluates its business performance as
a single entity, which provides manufacturing and refurbishing services and rents its tools to a single
industry, the Company reports as a single segment.

Valuation of Inventory — Inventories consist of raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods
and are stated at the lower of cost, determined using the weighted-average cost method, or market.
Finished goods inventories include raw materials, direct labor and production overhead. The Company
regularly reviews inventories on hand and current market conditions to determine if the cost of finished
goods inventories exceed current market prices and impairs the cost basis of the inventory accordingly.

Property, Plant and Equipment — Property and equipment are stated at cost. The cost of ordinary
maintenance and repair is charged to operating expense, while replacement of critical components and
major improvements are capitalized. Depreciation or amortization of property and equipment, including
assets held under capital leases, is calculated using the straight-line method over the asset’s estimated
useful life as follows:

Buildings and leasehold

improvements

Machinery, equipment and rental

tools

Furniture and fixtures
Transportation equipment
Computer equipment and software

2-39 years

18 months -
10 years
7 years
5 - 30 years
3-5 years

Property and equipment are reviewed for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable.
Indicative events or circumstances include, but are not limited to, matters such as a significant decline
in market value or a significant change in business climate. An impairment loss is recognized when the
carrying value of an asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows from the use of the asset
and its eventual disposition. The amount of impairment loss recognized is the excess of the asset’s
carrying value over its fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying value
or the fair value less cost to sell. Upon sale or other disposition of an asset, the Company recognizes a
gain or loss on disposal measured as the difference between the net carrying value of the asset and the
net proceeds received.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company determined that several Strider tools, which had been
capitalized as part of fixed assets, needed to be refurbished and updated to the latest version of the tool.
Several parts needed to be replaced, which will be done during the first quarter of 2016, thus the
Company recognized an impairment loss for these fixed assets of approximately $67,000 as of December
31, 2015.

Goodwill and Related Intangible Assets — Goodwill is the excess cost of an acquired entity over
the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. To determine
the amount of goodwill resulting from the HR Acquisition, we hired an outside third party to perform an
assessment to determine the fair value of Hard Rock’s tangible and intangible assets and liabilities and
goodwill was allocated to be $7,802,903.

For goodwill, an assessment for impairment is performed annually or whenever an event indicating
impairment may have occurred. The Company completes its annual impairment test for goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangibles using an assessment date of December 31. Goodwill is reviewed for
impairment by comparing the carrying value of the reporting unit’s net assets (including allocated
goodwill) to the fair value of the reporting unit. The fair value of the reporting units is determined using
a discounted cash flow approach. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires judgment and
the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Such estimates and assumptions include revenue growth
rates, operating margins, weighted average costs of capital, drill rig counts, market share and future market
conditions, among others. If the reporting unit’s carrying value is greater than its fair value, a second step
is performed whereby the implied fair value of goodwill is estimated by allocating the fair value of the
reporting unit in a hypothetical purchase price allocation analysis. The Company recognizes a goodwill
impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its fair value. The
impairment test is a fair value test which includes assumptions such as growth and discount rates. Any
impairment losses are reflected in operating income.

our income approach assessment of the future cash flows for our Company, applying expected long-term
growth rates, discount rates, and terminal values that we consider reasonable for our Company. Critical
assumptions include a recovery and market expansion of the Drill N Ream and Strider tool during 2016,
2017 and beyond.

The Company’s market capitalization is also used to corroborate reporting unit valuation. From
this valuation the Company has determined to fully impair goodwill totaling $7,802,903 as of December
31, 2015.

As part of the evaluation of goodwill and using the forecasting model we evaluated intangible

assets and determined no impairment of intangible assets is required.

Note Receivable - Tronco — See the discussion of the Tronco note receivable in Note 9 to our

consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.

Income Taxes — The Company is a C-corporation for federal and state income tax reporting

purposes. Accordingly, we continue to be subject to federal and state income taxes, which may affect
future operating results and cash flows. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we estimated a net current
deferred tax asset of approximately $0 and $271,000, respectively. We also have a current tax payable
of $2,000 and $1,000 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we have
a non-current deferred tax liability of approximately $0 and 745,000, respectively, which were
established for differences between the book and tax basis of our assets and liabilities. The net effect of
setting up these tax assets and liabilities is a tax benefit of approximately $472,000 as of December 31,
2015 and a tax expense of approximately $474,000 as of December 31, 2014.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET

RISK.

We do not maintain any derivative instruments such as interest rate swap arrangements, hedging

contracts, futures contracts or the like.

Concentration of Credit Risk — We are dependent on just a few main customers. Our
refurbishing revenue of approximately $4.6 million or 37% of total revenue is from one customer and
we have three rental and repair tool customers which make up approximately $5 million or 40% of total
revenue. We are continuing to develop new products and tools which we believe will broaden our
customer base, which will have a positive effect on diversifying our concentration of credit risk.

In the past, we were dependent on just a few main customers, primarily Baker Hughes,
however, we believe that our purchase of HR and our development of new products has broadened our
customer base, which will have a positive effect on diversifying our concentration of credit risk in the
future. During 2015 Baker Hughes represented 37% of our total revenue and included in accounts
receivable at December 31, 2015 was $0.9 million. During 2014 Baker Hughes was a significant
customer representing 60% of our total revenue and included in accounts receivable at December 31,
2014 was $2.8 million.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SUPERIOR DRILLING PRODUCTS, INC.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Page

Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2015 and 2014

Consolidated Statements of Operations – for the Years Ended December

31, 2015 and 2014

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity – for the Years Ended

December 31, 2015 and 2014

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – for the Years Ended December

31, 2015 and 2014

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

52-75

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders
Superior Drilling Products, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Superior Drilling Products, Inc. and subsidiaries
(collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were
we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration
of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Superior Drilling Products, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.

/s/ Hein & Associates LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 18, 2016

SUPERIOR DRILLING PRODUCTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2015 and 2014

ASSETS

2015

2014

Current assets
Cash
Accounts receivable
Prepaid expenses
Inventory
Deferred tax asset
Other current assets

Total current assets
Property, plant and equipment, net
Intangible assets, net
Goodwill
Note receivable
Other assets

Total assets

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses
Income tax payable
Current portion of capital lease obligation
Current portion of related party debt
Current portion of long-term debt
Total current liabilities
Other long term liability
Deferred tax liability
Capital lease obligation, less current portion
Related party debt, less current portion
Long-term debt, less current portion
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies – see Note 10
Stockholders' equity
Common stock - $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares
authorized; 17,459,605 and 17,291,646 shares outstanding,
respectively

Additional paid-in-capital
Retained deficit

Total stockholders' equity

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$ 1,297,002
1,861,002
179,450
1,410,794
-
-

4,748,248
14,655,502
11,026,111
-
8,296,717
28,321

$ 5,792,388
4,403,001
163,934
1,219,079
271,298
45,000

11,894,700
15,963,629
13,472,778
7,802,903
8,296,717
112,606

$ 38,754,899

$ 57,543,333

$ 638,593
809,765
2,000
332,185
555,393
2,636,241
4,974,177
880,032
-
246,090
271,190
16,208,699
22,580,188

$ 893,376
1,967,091
1,000
292,979
492,452
10,720,243
14,367,141
-
744,577
578,273
1,117,820
10,669,311
27,477,122

17,460

17,292

31,379,520
(15,222,269)
16,174,711

30,815,609
(766,690)
30,066,211

$ 38,754,899

$ 57,543,333

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

SUPERIOR DRILLING PRODUCTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 and 2014

2015

2014

Revenue

$ 12,706,372

$ 20,036,895

Operating cost and expenses
Cost of revenue

Selling, general, and administrative expenses

Depreciation and amortization expense

Impairment of Goodwill

6,618,330

7,015,722

7,013,653

8,103,166

4,818,548

3,240,445

7,802,903

Total operating costs and expenses

26,253,434

18,359,333

Operating income (loss)

(13,547,062)

1,677,562

Other income (expense)
Interest income

Interest expense

Other income

Loss on disposal of PP&E

Change in guaranteed debt

Total other expense

Loss before income taxes

Income tax expense (benefit)

293,932

173,315

(1,822,636)

(2,279,597)

240,286

380,723

(92,378)

(53,287)

(45,834)

(1,380,796)

(1,824,680)

(14,927,858)

(147,118)

(472,279)

474,279

Net loss

$ (14,455,579)

$ (621,397)

Basic earnings per common share

$ (0.83)

$ (0.04)

Basic Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding

17,347,306

13,831,259

Diluted earnings Per Common Share

$ (0.83)

$ (0.04)

Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding

17,347,306

13,831,259

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

SUPERIOR DRILLING PRODUCTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Common Stock

Par Value

Additional

Paid-in
Capital

Retained
Deficit

Stock

Subscription
Receivable

Total

Stockholders
Equity

Balance – January 31, 2014

1,000

$ 1

$ 256,806

$ -

$ (1)

$ 256,806

Stock issued to founders as part

of reorganization

Sale of common stock

Offering costs paid out of

proceeds

Tronco guarantee release

Stock and warrants issued for

debt conversion

Non-cash contributions
Payable to founders

Distributions paid to founders

prior to reorganization

Real estate and related debt not

included in reorganization

Earnings prior to reorganization
Share based compensation
Net loss after reorganization

8,813,860

7,762,500

8,814

(8,815)

7,763

31,042,237

31,050,000

(3,578,865)

4,449,626

714,286

714

2,248,927

2,249,641

-
-

639,401
(2,000,000)

-
-

639,401
(2,000,000)

(1,976,283)

(447,208)

-
-
-

145,293
44,490
-

-
-
(766,690)

-
-
-

145,293
44,490
(766,690)

Balance - December 31, 2014

17,291,646

$ 17,292

$ 30,815,609

$ (766,690)

$ -

$ 30,066,211

Share based compensation

167,959

168

563,911

$ 564,079

Net loss

(14,455,579)

$ (14,455,579)

Balance - December 31, 2015

17,459,605

$ 17,460

$ 31,379,520

$(15,222,269)

$ -

$ 16,174,711

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

SUPERIOR DRILLING PRODUCTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net loss
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense
Amortization of debt discount
Deferred tax benefit
Share based compensation expense
Impairment of Goodwill
Change in guaranteed debt
Loss on disposition of assets
Non-cash items
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
Inventory
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Other assets
Accounts payable and accrued expenses

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
Note receivable to Tronco
Purchase of Hard Rock assets
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Principal payments on debt
Principal payments on capital lease obligations
Principal payments on related party debt
Proceeds received from borrowings on debt
Proceeds received from issuance of common stock
Initial Public Offering costs
Capital distributions

Net Cash Provided (Used) in Financing Activities

Net Increase (decrease) in Cash
Cash at Beginning of Period
Cash at End of Period

2015

2014

$(14,455,579)

$ (621,397)

4,818,548
567,187
(473,279)
564,079
7,802,903

3,240,445
767,975

473,279
44,490
-

-
92,378

45,837
53,287

(224,587)

2,541,999
(191,715)
29,484
84,285
(531,077)

(1,424,335)
(483,651)
43,634
90,481
2,137,939

624,626

4,367,984

(1,284,782)
62,000
-
-

(1,222,782)

(3,730,882)
1,648,075
(8,296,717)
(12,500,000)
(22,879,524)

(3,159,100)
(492,452)
(292,977)
47,299

-
-
-
(3,897,230)

(3,527,830)
(258,234)
-
2,000,000
31,050,000
(3,578,865)
(1,392,399)
24,292,672

(4,495,386)
5,792,388
$ 1,297,002

5,781,132
11,256
$ 5,792,388

Supplemental information:
Cash paid for Interest
Stock issued to founders upon reorganization (see
Note 2)
Conversion of bridge loan for stock and warrants
(see Note 2)
Non-cash contributions of inventory by Meiers
(see Note 11)
Non-cash $2 million payable by Meiers upon
reorganization (see Note 2)
Real estate and related debt not included in
reorganization (see Note 2)
Relief of Tronco guarantee upon IPO (see Note 9)

$ 1,159,969

$ 1,837,407

$ -

$ 8,814

$ -

$ 2,249,641

$ -

$ 639,401

$ -

$ 2,000,000

$ -

$ 447,208
$ 4,449,626

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

SUPERIOR DRILLING PRODUCTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations

Superior Drilling Products, Inc. (the “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”) is a drilling and completion
tool technology company. We manufacture, repair, sell and rent drilling tools. All of the drilling tools
that we rent are manufactured by us. Our customers are engaged in the domestic and international
exploration and production of oil and natural gas. We were incorporated on December 10, 2013 under
the name SD Company, Inc. in order to facilitate (a) the reorganization of the entities that are now our
consolidated subsidiaries (see Note 2) and (b) the subsequent acquisition of Hard Rock Solutions, LLC
(see Note 3). We changed our name from SD Company Inc. to Superior Drilling Products, Inc. on May
22, 2014 in conjunction with closing of that reorganization. Our headquarters and principal manufacturing
operations are located in Vernal, Utah.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the
Company, and of its wholly-owned subsidiaries (a) Superior Drilling Solutions, LLC (previously known
as Superior Drilling Products, LLC), a Utah limited liability company (“SDS”), together with its wholly
owned subsidiary, Superior Drilling Products of California, LLC, a California limited liability company
(“SDPC”), (b) Superior Design and Fabrication, LLC, a Utah limited liability company (“SDF”), (c)
Extreme Technologies, LLC, a Utah limited liability company (“ET”), (d) Meier Properties Series, LLC,
a Utah limited liability company (“MPS”), (e) Meier Leasing, LLC, a Utah limited liability company
(“ML”), and (f) Hard Rock Solutions, LLC, a Utah limited liability company (“HR”). These consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America (“GAAP”), and all significant intercompany accounts have been eliminated
in consolidation.

The primary business of the Company is to manufacture, refurbish and rent tools to the oil and

natural gas industry. As a result, the Company’s financial results are reported as a single segment.

As a company with less than $1.0 billion in revenue during its last fiscal year, we qualify as an
emerging growth company as defined in the recently enacted Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of
2012, or the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage of exemptions from various
reporting requirements applicable to other public companies that are not an “emerging growth company.”

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ

from those estimates. The more significant estimates affecting amounts reported in our consolidated
financial statements include, but are not limited to: determining the allowance for doubtful accounts,
recoverability of long-lived assets, useful lives used in calculating depreciation and amortization,
valuation of inventory, Note receivable - Tronco and accounting for the Hard Rock Acquisition as defined
in Note 3.

Revenue Recognition.

Refurbishing — Refurbishing services are performed in our facilities for Baker Hughes under a

Vendor Agreement. Under the Vendor Agreement, revenue is determined based on a standard hourly
rate to complete the work. Revenue for refurbishing services is recognized as the services are rendered
and upon shipment to the customer. Shipping and handling costs related to refurbishing services are paid
directly by Baker Hughes at the time of shipment.

Manufacturing — Revenue from manufactured products are sold at prevailing market rates. We
recognize revenue for these products upon customer pick up, which is when title passes, when
collectability is reasonably assured and when there are no further significant obligations for future
performance. Typically this is at the time of customer acceptance. Shipping and handling costs related to
product sales are recorded as a component of both the sales price and cost of the product sold.

Rental income — Hard Rock operates as a rental tool company to oil and natural gas
companies. While the duration of the rents vary by job and number of runs, these rents are generally
less than one month. The rental agreements do not have any minimum rental payments or term.
Revenue is recognized upon completion of the job. The tools are rented to entities operating in North
Dakota, Wyoming, Texas, Montana, Oklahoma, Utah, New Mexico and Colorado.

Customer Concentration Risk — In the past, we were dependent on just a few main customers,

primarily Baker Hughes, however, we believe that our purchase of HR and our development of new
products has broadened our customer base, which will have a positive effect on diversifying our
concentration of credit risk in the future. During 2015 Baker Hughes represented 37% of our revenue
and included in accounts receivable at December 31, 2015 was $0.9 million. During 2014 Baker
Hughes was a significant customer representing 60% of our revenue and included in accounts receivable
at December 31, 2014 was $2.8 million.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit. We maintain cash deposits with financial
institutions that may exceed federally insured limits at times. We have chosen credible institutions and
believe our risk of loss is negligible.

Accounts Receivable; Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are generally due within 60 days of the invoice date. No interest is charged
on past-due balances. We grant credit to our customers based upon an evaluation of each customer’s
financial condition. We periodically monitor the payment history and ongoing creditworthiness of our

customers. An allowance for doubtful accounts is established at a level estimated by management to be
adequate based upon various factors including historical experience, aging status of customer accounts,
payment history and financial condition of our customers. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014,
management determined that no allowance for doubtful accounts was deemed necessary due to our
expectation that the Company will collect all amounts owed.

Inventory

Inventories consist of raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods and are stated at the lower
of cost, determined using the weighted-average cost method, or market. Finished goods inventories
include raw materials, direct labor and production overhead. The Company regularly reviews inventories
on hand and current market conditions to determine if the cost of finished goods inventories exceed current
market prices and impairs the cost basis of the inventory accordingly.

The Company has determined to discontinue OrBit as part of its business. The Company has

measured the remaining assets associated with OrBit at fair value based on management’s best estimate
of market participants. The total fair value measurement of the OrBit assets at December 31, 2015 is
$210,745, which created an impairment of $124,872.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. The cost of ordinary maintenance and repair is charged
to operating expense, while replacement of critical components and major improvements are capitalized.
Depreciation or amortization of property and equipment, including assets held under capital leases, is
calculated using the straight-line method over the asset’s estimated useful life as follows:

Buildings and leasehold

improvements

Machinery, equipment and rental

tools

Furniture and fixtures
Transportation equipment
Computer equipment and software

2-39 years

18 months -
10 years
7 years
5 - 30 years
3-5 years

Property and equipment are reviewed for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable.
Indicative events or circumstances include, but are not limited to, matters such as a significant decline in
market value or a significant change in business climate. An impairment loss is recognized when the
carrying value of an asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows from the use of the asset
and its eventual disposition. The amount of impairment loss recognized is the excess of the asset’s carrying
value over its fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying value or the fair
value less cost to sell. Upon sale or other disposition of an asset, the Company recognizes a gain or loss

on disposal measured as the difference between the net carrying value of the asset and the net proceeds
received.

Goodwill and Related Intangible Assets

Goodwill is the excess cost of an acquired entity over the amounts assigned to assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination. We did not recognize any goodwill as the result of the
Reorganization. To determine the amount of goodwill resulting from the Hard Rock Acquisition, we hired
an outside third party to perform an assessment to determine the fair value of Hard Rock’s tangible and
intangible assets and liabilities and goodwill was allocated to be $7,802,903.

For goodwill, an assessment for impairment is performed annually or whenever an event indicating
impairment may have occurred. The Company completes its annual impairment test for goodwill and
other indefinite-lived intangibles using an assessment date of December 31. Goodwill is reviewed for
impairment by comparing the carrying value of the reporting unit’s net assets (including allocated
goodwill) to the fair value of the reporting unit. The fair value of the reporting units is determined using
a discounted cash flow approach. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires judgment and
the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Such estimates and assumptions include revenue growth
rates, operating margins, weighted average costs of capital, drill rig counts, market share and future market
conditions, among others. If the reporting unit’s carrying value is greater than its fair value, a second step
is performed whereby the implied fair value of goodwill is estimated by allocating the fair value of the
reporting unit in a hypothetical purchase price allocation analysis. The Company recognizes a goodwill
impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its fair value. The
impairment test is a fair value test which includes assumptions such as growth and discount rates. Any
impairment losses are reflected in operating income.

As part of our internal annual business outlook for our Company we performed during the fourth
quarter, we considered changes in the global economic environment which affected our stock price and
market capitalization. During 2015 the global oil and natural gas commodity prices, particularly crude
oil, decreased significantly. This decrease in commodity prices has had, and is expected to continue to
have a negative impact on industry drilling and capital expenditure activity, which affects the demand for
products and services of our Company. As part of the first step of goodwill impairment testing, we updated
our income approach assessment of the future cash flows for our Company, applying expected long-term
growth rates, discount rates, and terminal values that we consider reasonable for our Company. Critical
assumptions include a recovery and market expansion of the Drill N Ream tool during 2016 and beyond.

The Company’s market capitalization is also used to corroborate reporting unit valuation. From
this valuation the Company has determined to fully impair goodwill totaling approximately $7,803,000 as
of December 31, 2015.

Intangible assets with definite lives comprised of developed technology, customer contracts and
relationships, and trade names and trademarks are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the
intangible asset, generally three to seventeen years. These assets were tested for impairment as of yearend
and it was determined that no impairment was needed as of December 31, 2015.

Research and Development

We expense research and development costs as they are incurred. For the years ended December

31, 2015 and 2014, these expenses were $1.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted gain per share is calculated to give
effect to potentially issuable common shares, which include stock warrants. As of December 31, 2015,
the Company had warrants exercisable for 714,286 shares of common stock at $4.00 per share. These
warrants have a 4 year term expiring in February 2018. These warrants were anti-dilutive for year ended
December 31, 2015.

Income Taxes

The Company recognizes an asset or liability for the deferred tax consequences of all temporary
differences between the tax basis of assets or liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial
statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years when the reported amounts of
the asset or liabilities are recovered or settled and for operating loss carry forwards. These deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates that will be in effect when the differences
are expected to reverse and the carry forwards are expected to be realized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed
periodically for recoverability and a valuation allowance is provided as necessary.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company follows ASC 718, Compensation- Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), which
requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards,
including restricted stock units and options, based on estimated grant date fair values. Restricted stock
units are valued using the market price of our common shares on the date of grant. The fair value of the
vested stock options are calculated using the Black-Scholes model with a volatility and discount rate
over the expected term of each employee. The Company records compensation expense, net of
estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period.

Recently Enacted Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards

Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASU 2014-09"), which
requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of
promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition

guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-
14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASU 2015-14"), which deferred the effective date of
ASU 2014-09 for all entities by one year and is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2018. ASU 2015-14 permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition
method. We have not yet selected a transition method nor has the effect of the standard on ongoing
financial reporting been determined.

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01, “Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by

Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items.” ASU 2015-01 eliminates from U.S. GAAP the
concept of an extraordinary item. The FASB released the new guidance as part of its simplification
initiative, which is intended to “identify, evaluate, and improve areas of U.S. GAAP for which cost and
complexity can be reduced while maintaining or improving the usefulness of the information provided to
users of financial statements.” The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15,
2015, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company does not believe this
pronouncement will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance

Costs.” ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented
in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with
debt discounts. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and
interim periods within those annual periods. The Company does not believe this pronouncement will
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory.”
This standard requires management to measure inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net
realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably
predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The pronouncement is effective for annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting
period and should be applied retrospectively, with early application permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on the consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.

The Company has decided to early adopt FASB issued ASU 2015-17 on disclosures for
investments that are measured by using net asset value per share, which is part of its Simplification
Initiative. The amendment eliminate the guidance in Topic 740, Income Taxes, that required an entity to
separate deferred tax liabilities and assets between current and noncurrent amounts in a classified balance
sheet. Rather, deferred taxes will be presented as noncurrent under the new standard.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

NOTE 2. CORPORATE REORGANIZATION

On December 10, 2013, the date the Company was incorporated, a stock subscription was received
by us for 1,000 shares of our common stock from Meier Family Holdings, LLC and Meier Management
Company (collectively, the “Founders”).

On May 22, 2014, we closed the reorganization of SDS, SDF, ET, MPS, and ML into wholly-
owned subsidiaries of the Company under the terms of an agreement and plan of reorganization, dated
December 15, 2013 (the “Reorganization”). In exchange for their ownership interest in those entities, the
Founders trusts received 8,813,860 shares of our common stock, in addition to the initial 1,000 shares of
our common stock. Each of the subsidiaries is considered to be the historical accounting predecessor for
financial statement reporting purposes. See Note 12 for further discussion of the income tax impact of
Reorganization.

On May 29, 2014, the Company completed its initial public offering of common stock pursuant to
a registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-195085), as amended and declared effective by the SEC
on May 22, 2014 (the “Offering”). Pursuant to the registration statement, the Company registered the offer
and sale of 7,762,500 shares of common stock, which included 1,012,500 shares of common stock
pursuant to an option granted to the underwriters to cover over-allotments. The Company’s sale of the
shares in the Offering closed on May 29, 2014.

The gross proceeds of the Offering, based on the public offering price of $4.00 per share, were
approximately $31.1 million. After subtracting underwriting discounts and commissions of $2.4 million,
the Company received net proceeds of approximately $28.7 million from the Offering. The Company used
$12.5 million of the net proceeds to acquire Hard Rock (See Note 3).

Upon closing of the Offering, the Company issued notes to the Founders trusts, in the amounts of
approximately $1.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively, as additional consideration for the
Reorganization. The obligations were initially required to be paid by the Company on or before January
2, 2015. On December 22, 2015, the Board of Directors and the Founders agreed to extend the maturity
date to January 2, 2017, with an interest rate of 7.5% dating back to May 22, 2014. The Company has
made payments on these notes in the aggregate of approximately $0.9 million and $0.5 million for 2015
and 2014, respectively. This balance was further reduced as a non- cash payment of the Tronco interest
due on December 31, 2015 and 2014 in the amount of approximately $291,000 and $165,000, respectively.

Upon closing of the Offering, the Company’s $2 million Bridge Loan automatically converted into
714,286 shares of our common stock, and a four-year warrant to purchase an equivalent number of shares
of our common stock at $4.00 per share (see also Note 7). The conversion feature and detachable warrants
qualified as a derivative liability at inception and recorded at a fair value of $1.9 million. Upon conversion,
the detachable warrant was recognized in additional paid in capital at a fair value of $1.1 million. Fair
value was determined using a Black-Scholes option model with level 3 fair value inputs as follows:

Strike price per share
Market price per share
Volatility
Term
Risk-free rate

NOTE 3. HARD ROCK ACQUISITION

$4.00
$4.00
47.3%
4 years
0.69%

Immediately upon closing the Offering, the Company used a portion of the Offering proceeds to
fund the purchase of all the interests of HR from its parent entity, Hard Rock Solutions, Inc. (“HRSI”)
under the terms of a membership interest purchase agreement dated January 28, 2014 (the “Hard Rock
Acquisition”). Closing of the Hard Rock Acquisition occurred on May 29, 2014.

HR operates as a rental tool company to oil and natural gas companies. While the duration
of the rents varies by job, these rents are generally less than one month. The tools are rented primarily
to entities operating in North Dakota, Wyoming, Texas, Montana, Oklahoma, Utah, New Mexico and

Colorado. Before our acquisition of HR, we received revenue from HRSI for manufacturing and repairing
the reamers, and the reamer royalty income upon rental of the tool.

The Hard Rock Acquisition has been treated as a business combination since the Company
acquired substantially all of the operating assets of HR. The majority of the purchase price was assigned
to intangible assets, which consist of developed technology, customer contracts and relationships, trade
names and trademarks and goodwill. The intangible assets will be amortized over the following lives:

Intangible Assets
Developed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customer contracts and relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trade names and trademarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Life
7 Years
5 Years
9 Years

Consideration consisted of $12.5 million paid at closing of the Offering and a $12.5 million seller’s
note (the “Hard Rock Note”) (see further discussion in Note 7 – Long term Debt, Hard Rock Note). The
fair value of the Hard Rock Note was determined to be $11,144,000 which is less than the face value due
to a below-market interest rate based on the JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. annual prime rate, or 3.25% per
annum as of December 31, 2014. Fair value was estimated based on the present value of future cash flows
at a market-assumed rate. The fair value of the assets acquired and the Hard Rock Notes are as follows:

Estimated fair value of assets acquired:
Rental tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed assets and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible assets:
Developed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customer contracts and relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trade names and trademarks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consideration paid and liabilities assumed:
Cash paid at closing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Note payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discount on note payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 832,097

9,000
100,000

7,000,000
6,400,000
1,500,000
7,802,903
23,644,000

12,500,000
12,500,000
(1,356,000)
$ 23,644,000

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company reviewed the rental tool inventory and
determined that many of the tools purchased would need to be scrapped due to the tools not meeting our
quality control requirements, and thus the Company removed them from their inventory. It has further
been determined that these tools should not have been included in the purchase price, but the value should
have been included as part of goodwill. We have retroactively decreased the rental tool fair value estimate
from $1.5 million, to $0.8 million and increased goodwill from $7.1 million to $7.8 million as of the
acquisition date. The Company had also depreciated these tools, thus in the financials we have reduced
depreciation expense in the amount of $0.1 million.

Acquisition Related Costs

Acquisition-related transaction costs consisted of various advisory, legal, accounting, valuation
and professionals or consulting fees totaling approximately $0.6 million, for the year ending December
31, 2014 and $0 for 2015. These cost were expensed as incurred and included in general administrative
expense on our consolidated statement of operations.

NOTE 4. INVENTORY

Inventory is comprised of the following:

Raw material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NOTE 5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment are comprised of the following:

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings – Superior Auto Body. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery under capital lease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transportation assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,
2015
$ 968,254
117,661
324,879
$ 1,410,794

December 31,
2014
990
$ 990,709
155,904
72,466
$ 1,219,079

December 31,
2015
$ 2,268,039
4,847,778
2,213,729
717,232
7,200,530
2,322,340
507,554
1,317,397
21,394,599
(6,739,097)
$ 14,655,502

December 31,
2014
$ 2,268,039
4,847,778
2,213,729
710,232
6,338,521
2,322,340
466,213
1,343,349
20,510,201
(4,546,572)
$15,963,629

Depreciation expense related to property, plant and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2015

and 2014 was $2,371,881 and $1,804,223, respectively.

On December 4, 2014 the Company sold its land and building in Bakersfield, California. The sales
price was $1,648,075, after deducting the cost of the land, building and closing cost, the Company
recorded a net gain on sale of asset of $0.3 million.

During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company determined that the estimated life of its Drill-N-
Tool is eighteen months compared with the original nine months, based on recent historical experience.
Effective October 1, 2014, the Company began depreciating the Drill-N-Ream tool over an eighteen
month useful life. The impact of this change for the year ending December 31, 2014 was a decrease of
$217,577 to depreciation expense and an increase to net income of the same amount and an EPS increase
of $0.02 per share.

NOTE 6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets are comprised of the following:

Developed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customer contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trademarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Accumulated amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,
2015

December 31,
2014

$ 7,000,000 $ 7,000,000
6,400,000
6,400,000
1,500,000
1,500,000
14,900,000
14,900,000
(3,873,889)
(1,427,222)
$ 11,026,111 $ 13,472,778

Amortization expense related to intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

was $2,446,667 and $1,427,222, respectively.

These intangible assets will be amortized over their expected useful lives using the straight-line
method, which is a weighted-average amortization period of 6.3 years. As of December 31, 2015, the
Company will recognize the following amortization expense for the respective periods ending December
31 noted below:

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Thereafter

Total

$2,446,667

2,446,667

1,239,443

$11,026,111

NOTE 7. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt is comprised of the following:

Real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hard Rock Note (net of $261,493 and $828,667 discount, respectively)
Related party loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transportation loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .

December 31,
2015
$ 7,590,042
9,738,521
826,583
857,947
658,430
19,671,523
(3,191,634)
243)

December 31,

2014
$ 7,912,354
11,671,333
1,610,273
1,019,100
786,767
22,999,827
(10,720,243)

$ 16,479,889 $ 12,279,584

Real Estate Loans

Manufacturing Facility

Our manufacturing facility was financed by a commercial bank loan dated August 23, 2010,
collateralized by a deed of trust on the commercial real property and the personal guarantee of two of
our ultimate beneficial owners, with a face value of $4.9 million, requiring monthly payments of
approximately $33,900, including principal and interest at 5.25%. During 2015 the Company refinanced
these two loans and combined them into one loan requiring monthly payments of approximately
$39,000, including principal and interest at 5.25%. A lump sum principal payment of approximately
$4.2 million is due at the maturity date of this loan on August 15, 2018.

Superior Auto Body Loans

Beginning on July 30, 2008, we were co-borrowers with Superior Auto Body, for development of
an auto body shop located in Riverton, Utah. The auto body shop is titled in MPS and rented to Superior
Auto Body under a lease agreement. See further discussion in Note 11 — Related Party Transactions.

We remain as co-borrowers on a note agreement of $1.7 million date March 19, 2012 with a
maturity date of March 19, 2017. Interest accrues at 5.50%. The note requires monthly payments of
$10,565 and a lump sum payment at maturity for the remaining principal balance. The note agreement
is guaranteed by MPS and our owners. On May 25, 2012, we became co-borrowers on Small Business
Administration guaranteed debentures totaling $1.2 million. The debentures accrue interest at 2.42% and
require monthly payments of $6,100 until maturity on July 1, 2032. The debentures are guaranteed by
SDP, Superior Auto Body and our Founders.

Hard Rock Note

On May 29, 2014, the Company purchased all of the interests of Hard Rock. Consideration
consisted of $12.5 million paid in cash at closing and a $12.5 million seller’s note (the “Hard Rock
Note”). The Hard Rock Note and subsequent amendments are secured by all of the patents, patents
pending, other patent rights, and trademarks transferred to Hard Rock by HR in the closing of the Hard
Rock Acquisition. At issuance, the fair value of the Note was determined to be $11,144,000, which is
less than the face value due to a below-market interest rate. The resulting discount will be amortized to
interest expense using the effective interest method, totaling approximately $567,000 and $527,000
during 2015 and 2014, respectively.

On April 22, 2015, the Hard Rock Note was restated and amended (the “Amended and Restated

Hard Rock Note”). The Amended and Restated Hard Rock Note accrued interest from April 20, 2015
until May 29, 2015 at an adjustable rate per annum equal to the JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. annual
prime rate as it had originally. From May 29, 2015 until amendment on September 28, 2015, the
Amended and Restated Hard Rock Note accrued interest at a fixed rate equal to 5.25% per annum.
Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Hard Rock Note, the Company made one installment
payment of $2.5 million plus accrued interest on May 29, 2015.

On September 28, 2015, the Amended and Restated Hard Rock Note was restated and amended

(the “Second Amended and Restated Hard Rock Note”). The Second Amended and Restated Hard Rock
Note accrues interest from July 1, 2015 until July 15, 2019 at a fixed interest rate equal to 5.75% per
annum. Under the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Hard Rock Note, the Company is
required to make the following payments (plus accrued interest): $500,000 on January 15, 2016,
$1,500,000 on July 15, 2016, $500,000 on each of January 15, March 15, May 15 and July 15, 2017,
$500,000 on each of January 15, March 15, May 15 and July 15, 2018, and $1,000,000 on each of
January 15, March 15, May 15 and July 15, 2019. The Second Amended and Restated Hard Rock Note
matures and is fully payable on July 15, 2019.

EB-5 Bakersfield Facility and Business Loans

In 2012, we received funding for expansion of our business into California under the EB-5 program
of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. During 2014 all of these loans were paid in
full. On August 1, 2014, the Company paid off two notes in association with its Bakersfield, California
location under the EB-5 program to the United States Employment Development Lending Center. The
total amount paid was $1.3 million.

Related Party Loans

Upon closing of the Offering, the Company issued notes to the Founders, in the amounts of
$1,280,000 and $720,000, respectively, as additional consideration for the Reorganization. The
obligations were initially required to be paid by the Company on or before January 2, 2015. On December
22, 2014, the Board of Directors and the Founders agreed to extend the maturity date to January 2, 2017,
with an interest rate of 7.5% dating back to May 22, 2014. The Company has made payments on these
notes in the aggregate of $891,238 and $479,295, which includes principal payment of approximately
$784,000 and $389,000 in aggregate, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. This balance was
further reduced from a non- cash payment on the Tronco interest due on December 31, 2015 and 2014 in
the amount of approximately $291,000 and $165,000, respectively (See Note 9).

Machinery Loans

During February 2013, MPS obtained a commercial loan collateralized by specific machinery
with a face value of $592,000, requiring monthly payments of approximately $8,600, including principal
and interest at 6% beginning March 1, 2013 and continuing through maturity on February 1, 2020. This
loan contains a minimum debt service ratio and fixed charge covenants. The Company was in compliance
with these covenants as of December 31, 2015.

On December 30, 2013, we purchased machinery for a total cost of approximately $680,000. We
paid $70,000 in cash as a down payment and obtained a loan of $627,000 to complete the purchase, of
which $572,000 was borrowed as of December 31, 2013. During 2014 the company borrowed the
remaining $55,000. The Small Business Administration has guaranteed 75% of the loan balance and the
terms are as follows: 7 year maturity, 6.00% interest rate, 84 monthly payments of $9,160. The machinery
is held as collateral.

During 2014, we paid off a loan that had a maturity date of February 2014 in the amount of

$391,000.

Transportation Loans

Vehicles

Our loans for Company vehicles and other transportation are with various financing parties we have
engaged with in connection with the acquisition of the vehicles. During the year ended December 31,
2015, the Company obtained a loan on one new vehicle in the amount of $47,298. During the year ended
December 31, 2014, the Company obtained loans on six new vehicles in the amount of $286,248. As of
December 31, 2015, the loans bear interest ranging from 0%-8.39% with maturity dates ranging from
January 2017 through October 2019, and are collateralized by the vehicles. Our cumulative monthly
payment under these loans as of December 31, 2015 was approximately $11,500, including principal and
interest.

Airplane Loan

Our loan for the Company airplane bears interest at 7.35%, requires monthly payments of
principal and interest of approximately $3,500, matures in May of 2026 and is collateralized by the
airplane.

Future annual maturities of all long-term debt are as follows:

Year
2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Thereafter

Total long-term debt

NOTE 8. LEASES

Capital Leases

3,191,634
4,427,694
6,732,306
4,347,728
246,833
986,821
19,933,016

In July 2012, we entered into a lease for machinery which required an initial payment of $928,776,
followed by 3 monthly payments of $15,000, and 58 monthly payments of approximately $32,000. The
terms of the lease included an imputed interest rate of 12.52%. The lease term expires August 1, 2017, at
which time we may either purchase the machinery for the greater of its then-agreed fair value or 15% of
its original cost, renew the lease for an additional 12 months or return the machine. Payments under the
lease are personally guaranteed by the Meiers. The lease has been capitalized and, accordingly, the
machinery and related obligation under the lease have been included in the accompanying balance sheet
as of December 31, 2015. Accumulated amortization on machinery under the capitalized lease totaled

$1,209,864 and $977,630 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization expense for this
machine is included in depreciation and amortization expense on the combined statement of operations.

Future minimum lease payments required under the capitalized leases in effect at December 31, 2015

are as follows:

Year
2016
2017

Total

Current portion of capital lease obligation

Long-term portion of capital lease obligations

332,185
246,090
-
578,275
(332,185)
246,090

Included in these payments is $0.07 million of imputed interest expense.

Operating Leases

We also lease certain property and equipment under non-cancellable agreements which have been
accounted for as operating leases. Future minimum lease payments required under operating leases in
effect at December 31, 2015 are as follows:

Year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020

Thereafter

Operating leases

504,341
159,251
140,977
130,086
76,512
-
1,011,167

NOTE 9. NOTE RECEIVABLE - TRONCO

In January 2014, we entered into a Note Purchase and Sale Agreement under which we agreed to
purchase a loan made to Tronco Energy Corporation (“Tronco”), a party related to us through common
control, in order to take over the legal position as Tronco’s senior secured lender. That agreement
provided that, upon our full repayment of the Tronco loan from the proceeds of the Offering, the lender
would assign to us all of its rights under the Tronco loan, including all of the collateral documents. On
May 30, 2014, we closed our purchase of the Tronco loan for a total payoff of $8.3 million, including
principal, interest, and early termination fees. As a result of that purchase, we became Tronco’s senior
secured lender, and as a result are entitled to receive all proceeds from sales of the Tronco-owned
collateral, as discussed below.

As the result of our purchase of the Tronco loan, we have the direct legal right to enforce the
collateral and guaranty agreements entered into in connection with the Tronco loan and to collect Tronco’s
collateral sales proceeds, in order to recover the loan purchase amount. The Tronco loan continues to be
secured by the first position liens on all of Tronco assets, as well as by the guarantees of Troy and Annette
Meiers (the “Meier Guaranties”), which are directly payable to and legally enforceable by us. In addition,
the Meiers have provided us with stock pledges in which they pledge all of their shares of our common
stock held by their family entities (the ‘‘Meier Stock Pledge’’), as collateral for the Meiers’ guaranties
until full repayment of Tronco loan. The certificates representing the 8,814,860 pledged shares are being
held in third-party escrow until full repayment of the Tronco loan. The pledged shares became tradable
in the public market 180 days after the closing of the Offering, subject to insider timing requirements and
volume limitations under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, and required periodic black-out periods. At a
$1.73 per share price at closing of the NYSE MKT on March 4, 2016, the pledged shares would currently
have a market value of over $14 million, significantly more than the amount necessary to repay the Tronco
loan, even if no Tronco assets were sold.

Based on the combined collateral value of the Tronco assets and of the Meier Stock Pledge, we
have determined that there is no risk of loss to us in connection with Tronco loan. Accordingly, we have
eliminated the guarantee liability totaling $4.4 million as a non-cash charge to additional paid in capital
and recorded the entire net realizable value of the Tronco loan totaling $8,296,717 as an asset in the
balance sheet for the period ended December 31, 2015.

Previously, the Tronco loan had been scheduled to mature in January 2014. On December 18,
2013, it was amended to extend the maturity date to June 30, 2014, in exchange for a one-time payment
of $68,881. The maturity date was further extendable, at Tronco’s election, for three additional six month
periods upon payment of additional extension fees. On June 29, 2014, the independent members of our
Board of Directors approved an extension of the June 30, 2014 payment date to July 31, 2014, to permit
consideration of a loan restructuring to be approved by our independent Board members under terms no
less favorable to us than could be negotiated with a third party at ‘‘arm’s length’’. Any renewal will
continue to be secured by the Meier Guaranties and the Meier Stock Pledge.

During July 2014, the Board of Directors agreed to restructure the Tronco loan effective May 29,

2014. As part of this restructuring the interest rate was decreased to the prime rate of JPMorgan Chase
Bank plus 0.25%, which was 3.5% as of December 31, 2014. The payment requirements and schedule
were also changed with the restructuring. Only interest is due on December 31, 2014 and, a balloon
payment of all unpaid interest and principal is due in full at maturity on December 31, 2015. As of
November 10, 2015, the Board of Directors agreed to extend the terms of the Tronco loan to interest only
payments due on December 31, 2015 and 2016, with a balloon payment of all unpaid interest and principal due in
full maturity on December 31, 2017. The Meiers paid the accrued interest of $291,238 by offsetting their
Founders notes which was due on December 31, 2015.

NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In October 2013, plaintiff Del-Rio Resources, Inc. (“Del-Rio”) filed a lawsuit, on its own behalf
and derivatively on behalf of Philco Exploration, LLC (“Philco”), against the following co-defendants (a)
Tronco Ohio, LLC and Tronco Energy Corporation (“Tronco”), (b) a former lender of Tronco, ACF
Property Management, Inc. (p.k.a. Fortuna Asset Management, LLC, ) (“ACF”), (c) Troy and Annette
Meier personally, and several of their family trusts, (d) Meier Family Holding Company, LLC and Meier
Management Company, LLC, and (e) Superior Drilling Solutions, LLC (“SDS”) and Meier Property
Series, LLC (“MPS”). That suit is currently pending in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Uintah County,
Utah under Cause #130800125. Del-Rio filed an Amended Complaint in the lawsuit on April 24, 2015.

We believe that Del-Rio’s claims are without merit, and all defendants are actively defending in this
matter. In particular, SDS’ and MPS’ only involvement was to grant guaranties and/or security interests
in their respective separate personal and real property to ACF to additionally collateralize the Tronco
loan before its purchase by us. In addition, since the Meiers and their personal trusts guaranteed
repayment of the Tronco loan, we believe that the basis of Del-Rio’s damages claims are nullified.
Consequently, we do not believe that Del Rio’s purported claims against SDS and MPS will have any
material adverse effect on our cash flow, business, or operations. There have been no decisions on the
merits of the claims in the lawsuit.

NOTE 11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Superior Auto Body

On January 1, 2016, the Company completed the divestiture of our interest in Superior Auto
Body and Paint (“SAB”), by selling the remaining ownership interests in the business operations to a
third party. The Company hired an independent third party evaluation firm to determine the value of the
operations of SAB. The Firm determined the value was $101,400 for the portion owned by the
Company. The Company received a $50,700 payment and a 9 month note for $50,700.

The Company will continue to lease certain of its facilities to Superior Auto Body (“SAB”). We
recorded rental income from the related party in the amounts of $199,902 and $144,943, for the year ended
December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

NOTE 12. INCOME TAXES

Prior to the Reorganization (see Note 2), the Company was a limited liability company and not
subject to federal income tax or state income tax (in most states). Accordingly, no provision for federal or
state income taxes was recorded prior to the Reorganization because the Company’s equity holders were
responsible for income tax on the Company’s profits. In connection with the closing of the Offering, the
Company merged into a corporation and became subject to federal and state income taxes. The Company’s
book and tax basis in assets and liabilities differed at the time of the Reorganization due primarily to
different cost depreciation methods utilized for book and tax purposes for the Company’s fixed assets.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded a net deferred tax benefit of approximately
$472,000 to recognize a deferred tax asset related to the Company’s book and tax basis differences. For
the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded a net deferred benefit tax expense of
approximately $474,000 to recognize a deferred tax liability related to the Company’s book and tax basis
differences.

Components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:

Current income taxes:

Federal
State

For the Year
Ended December
31, 2015

For the Year
Ended December
31, 2014

$ -
1,000

Current provision for income taxes

1,000

Deferred provision (benefit) for income taxes:
Federal
State

(413,148)
(60,131)

413,341
59,938

Deferred provision (benefit) for income taxes

(473,279)

473,279

Provision for income taxes

$ (472,279)

$ 474,279

The current and non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following:

Deferred tax asset:

Current:
Accrued expenses
Prepaid expense

Total current deferred tax assets

Non-current:
263A adjustment
Accrued expenses
Prepaid expense
Stock compensation
Amortization of intangibles
Net operating loss
Others

For the Year
Ended December
31, 2015

For the Year
Ended December
31, 2014

$ -
-

$ 332,120
(60,821)

271,299

26,178
326,589
(66,596)
55,817
3,444,048
2,088,208
35,488

-
-
-
-

201,953
94,007
10,750

Total non-current deferred tax assets

5,909,732

306,710

Total deferred tax assets

5,909,732

578,009

Deferred tax liabilities:
Non-current:
Depreciation on fixed assets

Total deferred tax liabilities

Net deferred tax assets/liabilities
Less: Valuation Allowance

Total deferred tax liabilities

(1,624,453)

(1,051,288)

(1,624,453)

(1,051,288)

4,285,280
(4,285,280)

(473,279)

$ -

$ (473,279)

Reconciliation of the tax rate to the U.S. federal statutory tax rate which relate to the year ended December 31,
2015 and 2014 is as follows:

For the Year
Ended December
31, 2015

For the Year
Ended December
31, 2014

Tax at federal statutory rate
State income taxes
Permanent differences
Change in valuation allowance
Other - State rate effect
Income tax prior to IPO not taxable to the Company
Change in status
Other

$ (5,075,472)

$ (79,973)

660
273,190
4,285,280
(464,450)

508,385
127

629
236,972

-
-
(415,772)
732,423
-

Provision for income taxes

$ (472,279)

$ 474,279

NOTE 13. SHARE BASED COMPENSATION

On November 11, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors approved that the Directors stock
compensation would be included in the Employee Stock Incentive Plan (“Stock Plan”) that reserves
1,724,128 shares of common stock for issuance. Equity and equity-based compensation plans are intended
to make available incentives that will assist us in attracting, retaining, and motivating employees, officers,
consultants, and directors by allowing them to acquire an ownership interest in our business, and, as a
result, encouraging them to contribute to our success. We may provide these incentives through the grant
of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and
units, and other cash-based or stock-based awards. As a result, we expect to incur non-cash, stock-based
compensation expenses in future periods.

On June 15, 2015, our stockholders approved the Superior Drilling Company, Inc. 2015 Long

Term Incentive Plan (the “2015 Incentive Plan”). The purpose of the 2015 Incentive Plan is to advance
the interests of the Company and its stockholders by providing an incentive to attract, retain and reward
persons performing services for the Company and its affiliates and by motivating such persons to
contribute to the growth and profitability of the Company and our affiliates. Subject to adjustment as
provided in the 2015 Incentive Plan, the maximum aggregate number of shares of the Company’s
common stock that may be issued with respect to awards under the 2015 Incentive Plan is 1,592,878.

Restricted Stock Units - As of December 31, 2015, there were 131,250 shares outstanding with

respect to awards granted under the Company’s 2014 Incentive Plan. The Board of Directors has frozen
the 2014 Incentive Plan, such that no future grants of awards will be made and the 2014 Incentive Plan
shall only remain in effect with respect to awards under that plan outstanding as of June 15, 2015 until
they expire according to their terms.

On August 10, 2015, the Board of Directors granted 71,202 restricted stock units from the
Company’s 2015 Incentive Plan to the Directors based on the closing price of the Company’s common
stock on the date of the grant. These restricted stock units will vest over a three-year period.

On August 10, 2015, the Board of Directors granted 366,000 restricted stock units from the

Company’s 2015 Incentive Plan to officers and employees based on the closing price of the Company’s
common stock on the date of the grant. These restricted stock units vested 33% on the grant date, 33%
on the first anniversary of the grant date and 34% on second anniversary of the grant date.

On December 23, 2015, the Board of Directors granted 7,000 restricted stock units from the

Company’s 2015 Incentive Plan to an employee based on the closing price of the Company’s common
stock on the date of the grant. These restricted stock units vested 33% on the grant date, 33% on the
first anniversary of the grant date and 34% on second anniversary of the grant date.

Compensation expense recognized for grants vesting under the 2014 Incentive Plan was

approximately $210,000 and $45,000 for the years end 2015 and 2014, respectively. Compensation
expense recognized for grants of restricted stock vesting under the 2015 Incentive Plan was
approximately $334,000 for the year ending December 31, 2015. The Company recognized
compensation expense and recorded it as share-based compensation in the consolidated statement of
operations.

Total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock units expected to
be recognized over the remaining weighted vesting period of 1.4 years equaled approximately $858,000
at December 31, 2015. These shares vest over a three-year time period.

The following table summarizes RSU activity for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:

2015

2014

Number of
Restricted
Stock Units

Weighted -
Average Grant
Date Fair Value

Number of
Restricted
Stock Units

Weighted -
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

131,250

$ 4.81

$ -

444,202

1.84

131,250

4.81

(167,959)

2.61

-
-
131,250

$ 4.81

Unvested RSU's at beginning of
period

Granted

Forfeited

Vested

Unvested RSU's at end of period

407,493

$ 2.48

Stock Options - Also, on August 10, 2015, the Board of Directors granted 87,500 stock options

from the Company’s 2015 Incentive Plan to officers and employees based on the closing price of the
Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. These restricted stock units and options vested 33%
on the grant date, 33% on the first anniversary of the grant date and 34% on second anniversary of the
grant date.

Compensation expense recognized for option grants vesting under the 2015 Incentive Plan was

approximately $20,000 for the year ending December 31, 2015. The Company recognized
compensation expense and recorded it as share-based compensation in the consolidated condensed
statement of operations.

The following table summarizes stock options outstanding and changes during the years ended

December 31, 2015 and 2014:

2015

2014

Number
of Stock
Options

Weighted -
Average
Exercise
Price

Number
of Stock
Options

Weighted -
Average
Exercise
Price

Stock options outstanding at beginning of
period

Granted

Exercised

Expired

Canceled or forfeited

$ -

87,500

1.85

-
-
(1,000)

-
-
1.85

Stock options outstanding at end of period

86,500

$ 1.85

Stock options exercised at end of period

$ -

-
-
-
-
-
-
-

$ -

The fair value of stock options granted to employees and directors was estimated at the grant

date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:

Expected volatility
Discount rate
Expected life (years)
Dividend yield

Years Ended December 31

2015

49%
1.09%
3
N/A

2014
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected

price volatility. Expected price volatility is based on the historical volatility of our common stock.
Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. The expected
term of the options granted is derived from the output of the option pricing model and represents the
period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding. The discount rate for the periods
within the contractual term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the date of
grant.

During 2015 the Company granted stock and options of 531,702 from our 2015 Employee Stock
Incentive Plan and during 2014 the Company granted stock of 131,250 shares from our 2014 Incentive
Plan, leaving 1,061,176 shares available for future grants from the 2015 Employee Stock Incentive Plan.

The awards granted vest equally over three years. Awards are valued using the closing share price of the
Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

NOTE 14. ORBIT

On January 9, 2015, we purchased the exclusive manufacturing, marketing and sales rights and

the current inventory of the OrBIT completion drill bit product line from Tenax Energy Solutions
(“Tenax”). Consideration for the purchase of inventory was approximately $300,000 in cash plus an
earn out of up to $2 million, subject to future OrBIT sales revenue over a 2-year period of monthly
payments not to exceed $83,333 based on the amount of sales each month. The agreement also provided
us the right of first refusal on any new or additional intellectual property of Tenax. Beginning January
1, 2016, the Company will have the option to purchase the OrBIT patents for $1,000,000.

The Company has determined to discontinue this part of our business. The Company has
measured the remaining assets associated with OrBit at fair value based on management’s best estimate
of market participants, resulting in an impairment of $124,872. The total fair value measurement of the
OrBit assets at December 31, 2015 is $210,745.

NOTE 15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Strider Agreement - On January 28, 2016, the Company reached an agreement to supply the
Strider Drill String Oscillation System ("Strider") and related services to Baker Hughes, a leading global
supplier of oilfield services, products, technology and systems.

New Credit Agreement - Effective March 8, 2016, the Company announced the completion of a

$3 million credit facility, pursuant to a Loan and Security Agreement among us and certain of our
subsidiaries, as the borrowers, and Federal National Commercial Credit, as the lender. The credit
facility is comprised of a two year $2.5 million accounts receivable revolving promissory note and a
$500,000 term promissory note.

The term loan is for a period of 60 months with monthly payment of $8,333, which includes

principal and interest, with a balloon payment at the end of the term. This note carries an interest rate of
prime plus 5% plus a monthly service fee of 0.30% of the outstanding balance.

The credit agreement also includes the following debt covenants: (a) Fixed Charge Coverage

Ratio of not less than 0.10 tested monthly from June 30 through August 31, 2016, then 0.35 for
September 30 and October 31, 2016, and then 1.00 for November 30, 2016 and each month thereafter;
(b) Debt-to-Tangible Net Worth of not greater than 4.35 tested monthly from April 30 through August
31, 2016 and then 4.25 for September 30, 2016 and each month thereafter; (c) Liquid Ratio of at least
0.325 tested monthly from April 30 through September 30, 2016 and then 0.40 for October 30, 2016 and
each month thereafter.

Salary for Stock Options Program - Effective upon the approval of the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) of the Company on March 4, 2016, the Company adopted a
salary for stock options program, whereby certain employees, including Troy Meier, the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer, Annette Meier, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, and Chris Cashion, the
Company’s Chief Financial Officer, elected to reduce their base salary for a period of time, and in
exchange for such election, they will receive non-qualified stock options exercisable for a number of
shares of the common stock of the Company. The exchange relates to the payroll amount to be received
by such employees on March 4, March 18 and March 31, 2016. In addition, the independent directors of
the Company have agreed to accept a portion of their March 31 quarterly cash payment for their service
on the Board in the form of non-qualified stock option exercisable for a number of shares of the
common stock of the Company in the same form as the employees as described above.

The number of shares underlying the stock option will be determined by dividing the amount of

the salary reduction (or in the case of the directors, cash fee reduction) by the fair value of the stock
options as determined using the Black-Scholes valuation method typically utilized by the Company.
The exercise price of the stock options will be determined based on the fair market value of the common
stock on the date of the payroll payment as specified above. The stock options will be fully vested on
the date of grant and the term of the stock options is ten years from the award date.

Registration Statement – On March 24, 2016, we filed Form S-3 Registration Statement as a

shelf registration in the amount of $7,500,000 as a contingency plan if the Company needs additional
funds over the next three years.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal
control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) as set forth in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework. During the course of this assessment, management identified a material
weakness relating primarily to recording complex financial transactions. To remediate these issues,
management has retained the services of additional third party accounting personnel as well as modified
existing disclosure controls and procedures in a manner designed to ensure future compliance.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d- 15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of
the period covered by this Annual Report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as
of December 31, 2015 due to certain material weaknesses.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting such that there is a possibility that a material misstatement in our interim financial statements
will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. During the course of our assessment, management
identified that the Company has a lack of staffing within its accounting department, in terms of the small
number of employees performing its financial and accounting functions, which does not provide the
necessary segregation of duties surrounding the cash disbursements process. Management believes the
lack of accounting and financial personnel amounts to a material weakness in its internal control over
financial reporting ability to adequately prepare financial statements and disclosures, and a lack of
accounting expertise to appropriately apply GAAP for complex and non-routine transactions. As a result,
at December 31, 2015 and on the date of this Report, its internal control over financial reporting is not
effective.

To remediate these issues, management has retained the services of additional third party accounting
personnel as well as to modify existing disclosure controls and procedures in a manner designed to ensure
future compliance. Our management currently believes the additional accounting resources will remediate
the weakness with respect to insufficient personnel.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

None

Internal Controls and Procedures

This Annual Report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal
control over financial reporting or an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting
firm due to a transaction period established by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for
newly public companies, and will not be required to include an attestation report for so for as long as we
are an “emerging growth company” pursuant to the provisions of the JOBS Act.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, the information required by this Item is
incorporated by reference to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the year ended December 31, 2015.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

PART IV

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

(1) Financial Statements – see Index to Financial Statements appearing on page 44

(2) Financial Statement Schedules – None

(3) Exhibits –

Exhibit No.
2.1

Description

Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated December 15, 2013, between Meier Management
Company, LLC, Meier Family Holding Company, LLC, and SD Company, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

3.1 Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014S-1).
3.2 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (name change) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.5 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on May 6, 2014).

3.3 Bylaws with Exhibit A (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant’s Registration

Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.1 Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit

10.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed
with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.2

2014 Employee Stock Incentive Plan with forms of award agreements as Exhibits (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).†

10.3 Form of Executive Employment Agreement between SD Company, Inc. and Troy Meier, as CEO

(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 30, 2014).†

10.4 Form of Executive Employment Agreement between SD Company, Inc. and Annette Meier, as

President (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April
30, 2014).†

10.5 Form of Executive Employment Agreement between SD Company, Inc. and Christopher
Cashion, as CFO (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the
SEC on April 30, 2014).†

10.6 Vendor Agreement between Superior Drilling Products, LLC, and Hughes Christensen, a

division of Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., dated October 28, 2013 with Exhibit A
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.7 Commercial Lease, dated August 15, 2013, between Meier Properties, Series LLC, as landlord,
and Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., as tenant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7
to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with
the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.8 Acknowledgement letter, dated September 11, 2013, between Superior Drilling Products, LLC

and Hard Rock Solutions, Inc., regarding the Drill N Ream commissions (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.9 Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (MIPA), dated January 28, 2014, between Hard Rock
Solutions, Inc., as seller, and Superior Drilling Products, LLC, as buyer, of Hard Rock Solutions,
LLC, with Exhibits (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.10 Intellectual Property Protection Agreement (IPPA), dated January 28, 2014, between 3cReamers,
LLC, Hard Rock Solutions, LLC, James D. Isenhour, and Troy Meier (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-
195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.11 Form of Subordinated Promissory Note from Hard Rock Solutions LLC and Superior Drilling

Products LLC, as borrower, in favor of Hard Rock Solutions, Inc., as lender, to be executed upon
closing of the Hard Rock acquisition (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the
SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.12 Form of Security and Pledge Agreement between SD Company, Inc., as debtor, in favor of Hard
Rock Solutions, Inc., as secured party, to be executed upon closing of the Hard Rock acquisition
with attached Schedule A (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April
7, 2014).

10.13 Form of Assignment Agreement between Superior Drilling Products, LLC and SD Company,

Inc. assigning SDP’s rights under the MIPA and IPPA to SDC, to be executed in connection with
the Reorganization (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.14 Securities Purchase Agreement, dated February 24, 2014, between SD Company, Inc. and

Superior Drilling Products, LLC, as borrowers, and D4D, LLC, as lender, for $2 million bridge
loan with attached exhibits (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April
7, 2014).

10.15 Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated February 24, 2014, in the original principal amount

of $2 million, from SD Company, Inc. and Superior Drilling Products, LLC, as borrowers, in
favor of D4D, LLC, as lender, with Exhibits (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the

Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the
SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.16 Security Agreements, dated February 24, 2014, between SD Company Inc. and Superior Drilling
Products, LLC, respectively, as debtors, and D4D LLC, as secured party (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.17 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant to be issued by SD Company Inc. in favor of D4D

LLC upon conversion of $2 million bridge loan with attached exhibits (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-
195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.18 Form of Registration Rights Agreement to be entered into between SD Company Inc. and D4D,

LLC upon conversion of $2 million bridge loan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the
SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.19 Standard Industrial/Commercial Single-Tenant Lease, dated January 17, 2014, between Superior

Drilling Products of California, LLC (SDP(CA)), as lessor, and Roger Holder, as lessee, with
respect to our Bakersfield facilities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the
SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.20 Loan Agreement, dated July 3, 2012, between Meier Properties, Series LLC and Superior

Drilling Products LLC, as co-borrowers, and Proficio Bank, as lender. (Proficio Loan 1)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-
1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.21 Term Note, dated July 3, 2012, from Meier Properties, Series LLC and Superior Drilling

Products LLC, as co-borrowers, and Proficio Bank, as lender, in the original principal amount of
$240,000. (Proficio Loan 1) with attached exhibits (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to
the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with
the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.22 Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and Assignment of Leases and Rents, dated July 3, 2012,

from Meier Properties, Series LLC, as grantor, to Proficio Bank, as trustee, and Proficio Bank, as
beneficiary. (Proficio Loan 1) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Registrant’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April
7, 2014).

10.23 Loan Agreement(s), dated December 30, 2013, between Superior Drilling Products, LLC, Meier
Leasing, LLC and Meier Management Company, LLC, as co-borrowers, respectively, and
Proficio Bank, as lender. (Proficio Loan 2) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the
SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.24 U.S. Small Business Administration Note, dated December 30, 2013, from Superior Drilling

Products, LLC, Meier Leasing, LLC and Meier Management Company, LLC, as co-borrowers, in
favor of Proficio Bank, as lender, in the original principal amount of $627,000. (Proficio Loan 2)

(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-
1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.25 Unconditional Guaranty(s) from each of Gilbert Troy Meier, Annette D. Meier, the Gilbert Troy
Meier Trust, the Annette Deuel Meier Trust, and Meier Family Holding Company, guarantor(s),
respectively, to Proficio Bank, as lender, each dated December 30, 2013. (Proficio Loan 2)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-
1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.26 Term Note, dated February 4, 2013, between Meier Leasing, LLC and Meier Management

Company, LLC, as co-borrowers, and Proficio Bank, as lender, in the original principal amount
of $592,000. (Proficio Loan 3) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Registrant’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April
7, 2014).

10.27 Third Amendment to Loan Agreement (dated December 18, 2013), Second Amendment to Loan

Agreement (dated June 15, 2009), First Amendment to Loan Agreement (dated December 10,
2007), and original Loan Agreement (dated August 10, 2007), between Tronco Energy
Corporation, as borrower, Philco Exploration, LLC, as subsidiary, and Fortuna Asset
Management LLC (and its assignee ACF Property Management, Inc. for the amendments).
(Tronco Loan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to the Registrant’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.28 Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note, dated January 1, 2014, between Tronco Energy
Corporation, as borrower, and ACF Property Management Inc. as lender (assignee from Fortuna
Asset Management LLC). (Tronco Loan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the
SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.29 Security Agreement Pledge between Tronco Energy Corporation, as debtor, and ACF Property
Management Inc. as secured party; and Owner Consent to Pledge from Meier Family Holding
Company, LLC, with respect to 95% of the limited liability company interests in Superior
Drilling Products, LLC, each dated June 15, 2009. (Tronco Loan) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.45 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-
195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.30 Security Agreement Pledge between Tronco Energy Corporation, as debtor, and ACF Property

Management Inc. as secured party; and Owner Consent to Pledge from Meier Management
Company, LLC, with respect to 5% of the limited liability company interests in Superior Drilling
Products, LLC, each dated June 15, 2009. (Tronco Loan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.46 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085)
filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.31 Security Agreement Pledge between Tronco Energy Corporation, as debtor, and ACF Property

Management Inc., as secured party; and Owner Consent to Pledge from Meier Management
Company, with respect to 100% of the limited liability company interests in Superior Design and
Fabrication, LLC, each dated December 18, 2013. (Tronco Loan) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.47 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-
195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.32 Guaranty(s) from Gilbert Troy Meier Trust (dated August 10, 2009), and from Superior Drilling
Products, LLC and Superior Design and Fabrication, LLC (dated December 18th, 2013), in favor
of ACF Property Management, Inc., as lender. (Tronco Loan) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.48 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-
195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.33 Loan Purchase Agreement between ACF Property Management Inc., as lender and seller, SD
Company Inc., as buyer, and Tronco Energy Corporation, as borrower, dated January 1, 2014.
(Tronco Loan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 to the Registrant’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.34 Loan Agreement, dated April 3, 2012, between Meier Properties Series LLC and Superior Auto

Body & Paint LLC (SABP) as co-borrowers, and Mountain West Small Business Finance, as
lender. (SABP Loan 1); Change in Terms Agreement dated March 19, 2012, between Superior
Auto BODY & Paint LLC, as borrower and Mountain America Credit Union, as Lender; and
Change in Terms Agreement dated March 19, 2012, between Superior Auto BODY & Paint
LLC, as borrower and Mountain America Credit Union, as Lender (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.50 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 30, 2014).

10.35 Promissory Note dated March 19, 2012, from Superior Auto Body and Paint LLC, as borrower,

in favor of Mountain America Credit Union in the amount of $1,698,005.00 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.51 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.36 Loan Agreement, dated May 25, 2012, between Meier Properties Series LLC and SABP, as co-

borrowers and Mountain West Small Business Finance, as lender. (SABP Loan 2) (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.37 U.S. Small Business Administration Note, dated May 25, 2012, between Meier Properties, Series

LLC, as debtor, SABP, as operating company, and Mountain West Small Business Finance, as
lender, in the original principal amount of $1,159,000.00 (SABP Loan 2) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.53 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.38 Security Agreement(s), dated May 25, 2012, between each of Meier Properties, Series LLC and

SABP, as debtor(s), and Mountain West Small Business Finance, as lender. (SABP Loan 2)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.54 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-
1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.39 Continuing Guaranty, dated May 20, 2011, by Superior Drilling Products , as guarantor, to

Mountain America Federal Credit Union, as lender. (SABP Loans 1 and 2) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.55 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.40 Lease, dated May 25, 2012, between Meier Properties, Series LLC, as lessor, and SABP, as

lessee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.41 Confirmation of Guaranties from Troy Meier, Annette Meier, the G. Troy Meier Trust, and the

Annette Deuel Meier Trust, to Superior Drilling Products, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.57 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on May 12, 2014).

10.42 Stock Pledge Agreement between Meier Management Company, LLC and Superior Drilling
Products, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.58 to Amendment No. 3 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the
SEC on May 12, 2014).

10.43 Stock Pledge Agreement between Meier Family Holding Company, LLC and Superior Drilling
Products, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to Amendment No. 3 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the
SEC on May 12, 2014).

10.44 Loan Agreement dated February 4, 2013, between Meier Leasing, LLC and Meier Management
Company, LLC, as co-borrowers, and Proficio Bank, as lender. (Proficio Loan 3) (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333- 195085) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2014).

10.45 Exclusive Manufacturing, Marketing, Sales and Consulting Agreement among Hard Rock
Solutions, LLC, Extreme Technologies, LLC, Tenax Energy Solutions, LLC and Kevin Jones
dated January 9, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the Company’s annual report
on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed on March 31, 2015.

10.46 Business Loan Agreement between Meier Properties, Series LLC and American Bank of the

North dated April 9, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on April 15, 2015).

10.47 Commercial Guaranty between Superior Drilling Products, Inc. and American Bank of the North
dated April 9, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on April 15, 2015).

10.48 Commercial Guaranty between G. Troy Meier and American Bank of the North dated April 9,
2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on April 15, 2015).

10.49 Commercial Guaranty between Annette Meier and American Bank of the North dated April 9,
2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on April 15, 2015).

10.50 Amended and Restated Promissory Note from Hard Rock Solutions, LLC and Superior Drilling

Solutions, LLC in favor of WMAFC, Inc. dated April 28, 2015 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 15, 2015).

10.51 Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement (3 Year Vesting) under the 2015 Incentive Plan

(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed on April 28, 2015).

10.52 Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement (2 Year Vesting) under the 2015 Incentive Plan

(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed on April 28, 2015).

10.53 Form of Award of Restricted Stock (3 Year Vesting) under the 2015 Incentive Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on April 28,
2015).

10.54 Form of Award of Restricted Stock (2 Year Vesting) under the 2015 Incentive Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on April 28,
2015).

10.55 2015 Long Term Incentive Plan effective June 15, 2015 (incorporated herein by reference to

Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the
Commission on April 30, 2015).

10.56 Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note from Hard Rock Solutions, LLC and Superior
Drilling Solutions, LLC in favor of WMAFC, Inc. dated September 28, 2015 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on October 1, 2015).

10.57++ Business Subcontractor Agreement between Hard Rock Solutions, LLC and Baker Hughes

Oilfield Operations, Inc. dated January 25, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 29, 2016).

10.58 Loan and Security Agreement among Superior Drilling Products, Inc., Superior Drilling Solutions,
LLC, Hard Rock, LLC and Extreme Technologies, LLC as co-Borrowers and Federal National
Commercial Credit as Lender date March 8, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2016).

10.59 Promissory Note dated March 8, 2016 issued in favor of Federal National Commercial Credit as
Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on March 10, 2016).

10.60 Term Promissory Note dated March 8, 2016 issued in favor of Federal National Commercial Credit
as Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed on March 10, 2016).

10.61 Subordination Agreement among Superior Drilling Products, Inc., Meier Management Company,
LLC and Federal National Commercial Credit dated March 8, 2016 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2016).

21.1* Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1* Consent of Hein & Associates LLP

31.1* Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for G. Troy Meier.

31.2* Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Christopher D. Cashion.

32** Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for G. Troy Meier and

Christopher D. Cashion.

101*

Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T

101.INS XBRL Instance

101.SCH XBRL Schema

101.CAL XBRL Calculation

101.DEF XBRL Definition

101.LAB XBRL Label

101.PRE XBRL Presentation

Filed herewith.
Furnished herewith.

Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

*
**
†
++ Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission and this exhibit has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection
with such request.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the

registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.

March 30, 2016

SUPERIOR DRILLING PRODUCTS, INC.

By: /s/ G. TROY MEIER
G. Troy Meier, Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ CHRISTOPHER D. CASHION

By:
Christopher D. Cashion, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)

By: /s/ ANNETTE MEIER
Annette Meier, President, Chief Operating

Officer and Director

By: /s/ TERENCE CRYAN
Terence Cryan, Director

By: /s/ ROBERT IVERSEN
Robert Iversen, Director

By: /s/ MICHAEL RONCA
Michael Ronca, Director

This page intentionally left blank.

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Corporate Headquarters

Superior Drilling Products, Inc.
1583 South 1700 East
PO Box 1656
Vernal, UT 84078
435.789.0594

www.sdpi.com

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Corporate Officers

Troy Meier
Chairman and CEO

Annette Meier
President and COO

Chris Cashion
Chief Financial Officer

David Gale
Vice President of Operations

Lane Snell
Vice President of Engineering

Board of Directors

Troy Meier, Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer
Superior Drilling Products, Inc.

Terence Cryan 1*, 2, 3
Managing Director
Concert Energy Partners

Robert Iversen 1, 2*, 3
President and Partner
CTI Energy Services

Stock Exchange Listing
The Company’s stock is traded on the NYSE MKT
exchange under the symbol SDPI.

2016 Annual Meeting

Superior Drilling Products’ Annual Meeting
of Shareholders will be held at 9:00 am MT
on December 15, 2016 at

Superior Drilling Products, Inc.
Corporate Headquarters
1583 South 1700 East
Vernal, UT 84078

Investor Relations

Investors, stockbrokers, security analysts and
others seeking information about Superior Drilling
Products, contact:

Deborah K. Pawlowski
Kei Advisors LLC
716.843.3908
dpawlowski@keiadvisors.com

Garett K. Gough
Kei Advisors LLC
716.846.1352
ggough@keiadvisors.com

Transfer Agent

For services, such as reporting a change of address,
replacement of lost stock certificates, changes in
registered ownership, or for inquiries about your
account, contact:

Annette Meier
President and Chief Operating Officer
Superior Drilling Products, Inc.

Michael Ronca 1, 2, 3*
President and Chief Executive Officer
EagleRidge Energy

1 Audit Committee
2 Compensation Committee
3 Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
* Committee Chairman

VStock Transfer, LLC
18 Lafayette Place
Woodmere, New York 11598
Tel: 212.828.8436
Fax: 646.536.3179
www.vstocktransfer.com

Independent Auditors

Hein & Associates
Dallas, Texas

1583 South 1700 East  PO Box 1656  Vernal, UT 84078
435.789.0594  www.sdpi.com