Quarterlytics / Communication Services / Electronic Gaming & Multimedia / Take-Two Interactive

Take-Two Interactive

ttwo · NASDAQ Communication Services
Claim this profile
Ticker ttwo
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Communication Services
Industry Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2012 Annual Report · Take-Two Interactive
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT 2012

DEAR
SHAREHOLDERS,

fi

fi

During fiscal year 2012, we made signifi
fi
cant progress on
our creative, operational and strategic objectives, even 
though we were unable to achieve our revenue and profitfi
goals. Our fi nancial results for the year were negatively
affected by our decision to postpone the release of several
titles in order to allow for additional development time. 
We believe that our unwavering commitment to quality 
is the right approach for maximizing shareholder value,
even though income may occasionally be deferred in the 
short-term. We expect to generate substantial revenue 
growth and profitability in fi
fi

scal year 2013.

fi

KEY ACHIEVEMENTS
Over the past year, our team:

• Launched L.A. Noire, which transcends the boundary

between interactive entertainment and cinema.
This groundbreaking title received excellent reviews
and, according to NPD data for the U.S., was the
highest-selling new intellectual property in our 
industry during 2011.

• Delivered the top-ranked and top-selling basketball 

video game for the 11th year in a row with the release
of NBA 2K12. The title received the highest Metacritic
score in the history of 2K Sports and, for the second
consecutive year, sold-in over 5 million units and 
.
led 2K Sports to achieve profi tability

fi

•  Grew our revenue from digitally delivered content 
to a record $107 million – representing 13% of our
total net revenue in fiscal 2012.

fi

• Released three new titles for iOS, as well as our 

Grand Theft Auto III – 10th

fi rst offering for Android.
fi
Anniversary Edition for the first time delivered the
full console experience of Grand Theft Auto to 
smartphones and tablets and is our highest-selling
.
and most profitable mobile release to date

fi

fi

fi
• Launched our fi rst social game, 

Civ World, for 

Facebook, which received excellent reviews and is 
the most immersive game available on the platform.
While not a meaningful contributor to revenue, this 
project was invaluable in helping us understand
what drives success on social platforms.

•  Continued to make substantial progress on our 

three online games for Asian markets.

• Raised $250 million through a convertible 

notes offering and renewed our credit facility – 
both on highly attractive terms.  

•  Launched new online stores for Rockstar Games 
and 2K, which enable consumers to discover and 
purchase games and branded merchandise directly
from our labels.

OUR STRATEGY FOR GROWTH
Take-Two’s strategy is to develop the highest-quality,
most compelling entertainment franchises in the business, 
and deliver them on any platform that is relevant to our
audience. We are actively investing in both our core 
console and PC businesses, as well as in offerings for
emerging online and mobile platforms.

World-class creative teams: Everything starts with our 
investment in world-class creative teams. The talent we
continue to attract and retain at our Rockstar Games and 
2K labels is an essential ingredient to building what we 
believe is the strongest portfolio of intellectual property
in our industry. Today, we have approximately 1,700
developers in 15 studios around the world. Our creative
teams have proven their ability to deliver games that
consistently achieve high critical praise. While strong 
ratings may not necessarily guarantee blockbuster sales,
there is certainly a correlation. In addition, quality games 
tend to withstand the test of time, which is reflected in 
the robust catalog sales that many of our titles enjoy.

fl

Diverse portfolio of industry-leading intellectual 
property: We believe our portfolio of intellectual property
is the strongest in our industry.  We have 9 franchises
with individual titles that have sold-in approximately 
5 million or more units. Since 2007, we have launched
5 successful new franchises and released 34 distinct 
multi-million unit selling titles. We aim to manage our
portfolio of intellectual property carefully in order to 
reap the benefi ts of dependable hit franchises without
creating untimely product fatigue. To that end, we
continually strive to balance our development efforts
between new IP and sequels to our existing hit franchises.

fi

fi

Driving value through evolving business models:
Our willingness to embrace evolving business models is
an important driver of incremental growth and margins.
Take-Two was among the first publishers to create 
downloadable add-on content, and we continue to be a
leader in delivering innovative offerings, both digitally and
as packaged goods. Add-on content generates revenue 
and profi ts, and prolongs consumer engagement with 
our titles. This not only extends the life and value of each 
release, it also helps mitigate demand for used copies of
our games. We had great success with add-on content 
for Grand Theft Auto IV, Borderlands and Red Dead 
Redemption, and expect add-on content to play an
integral role in enhancing most of our future releases.

fi

Investing in traditional and digital distribution 
platforms: The fi nal component of our growth strategy 
is to distribute our products to consumers through all 
relevant platforms and channels, whether as packaged 
goods or through digital downloads. 

fi

TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 2012

 
 
  Mobile gaming, especially on tablets, represents an
important growth opportunity for our Company. We will
continue to invest to bring both our deep catalog of 
titles and select new releases to mobile platforms.
  Our online gaming initiatives currently are focused
on Asian markets, where we have partnered with three of 
the region’s leading developers and publishers. Working
with Tencent, we are in the open beta phase of publishing
an online version of NBA 2K for distribution in China and 
K
other key markets. We are also co-developing an online
baseball game for the South Korean market with Nexon 
Corporation and a massively multiplayer online game for 
Asia based on a 2K Games franchise with XL Games. These
partnerships are enabling Take-Two to enter the world’s 
largest online gaming market with a measured approach
to managing risk. If successful, these initiatives will be 
signifi cantly accretive to revenue and earnings, and
provide a more predictable and recurring revenue stream
to complement our core business.

fi

By making our products available wherever and
however consumers want them, we are maximizing our 
audiences, expanding our business, creating value over 
time and informing our business decisions for the future.

fifi

 Take-Two possesses the

Solid financial foundation:
strongest liquidity and balance sheet in its history – and
the ability to invest aggressively for long-term growth. 
As of March 31, 2012, we had $420 million in cash and no
borrowings under our $100 million line of credit.

ROBUST LINEUP OF NEW RELEASES
Our strong outlook for fi scal 2013 and beyond is
fi
driven by the most robust lineup of new releases in
Take-Two’s history.

In May, Rockstar Games launched their eagerly 
anticipated Max Payne 3, which fused action gameplay
seamlessly with a dark single-player story and their
deepest multiplayer experience to date. The title received
critical acclaim, including from The New York Times which
wrote, “Max Payne 3 is a taut and compelling action 
game wrapped in the sumptuous, gritty and delightful 
production detail that is the Rockstar hallmark.”

In June, 2K Games released Sid Meier’s Civilization V:

Gods & Kings, a massive expansion pack for the 
award-winning strategy title, and Spec Ops: The Line, 
a military shooter that combines intense action with a 
riveting narrative set against the backdrop of a
sandstorm-ravaged Dubai.

Starting this summer, 2K Play will launch a new slate 

of mobile titles, including Herd, Herd, Herd; House Pest 
Starring Fiasco the Cat; GridBlock; Carnival Games 
MiniGolf; and Comedy Central’s Indecision Game –
a battle of political wits kept honest by ballot peeks,
smear campaigns and recounts. 

In September, 2K Games will launch Borderlands 2,
the next installment in our critically acclaimed franchise, 
which is in development at Gearbox Software. Gamers
can play as one of four new vault hunters in seeking 
treasure and mayhem on the untamed planet of Pandora. 
Players will face off against massive new worlds, creatures, 
psychos, and the evil mastermind, Handsome Jack. 

With action-packed single- and cooperative multiplayer
experiences, Borderlands 2 will continue to defi
fi
2
role-playing shooter genre. 

ne the 

In October, 2K Sports will release NBA 2K13. We are
confident that the title will once again raise the bar for 
fi
excellence in a basketball video game. This new installment 
in the top-selling and top-rated NBA simulation franchise
features the Oklahoma City Thunder’s Kevin Durant,
Los Angeles Clippers’ Blake Griffin and the Chicago 
Bulls’ Derrick Rose as the chosen trio of cover athletes 
representing the new dynasty of NBA future legends.

fi

Also in October, 2K Games will bring one of gaming’s
most beloved franchises back to fans with XCOM: Enemy 
Unknown. Developed by Firaxis Games, the strategy 
experts behind our Civilization franchise, the title
combines strategy with intense combat as players fight 
to control the fate of the human race by defending against
a terrifying global alien invasion. In addition, 2K Marin
continues to move forward with the development of XCOM, 
a tactical squad-based shooter offering a strong character-
driven experience, which is planned for release during 
fi
fiscal year 2014. 

fi

BioShock Infinitefifi

 is currently in development at

Irrational Games and is planned to launch on February 26, 
2013. Fans of the franchise can look forward to classic
BioShock gameplay and an immersive story, as well
as exciting innovations that include aerial combat on 
high-speed Sky-Lines and an arsenal of new weapons 
and abilities. 

k

And, Grand Theft Auto V is in full development and 
V
promises to continue Rockstar Games’ incredible track
record of delighting fans by setting new benchmarks in 
interactive entertainment through this iconic franchise.

OUR FUTURE
Looking ahead, we believe that success in our industry
requires four key elements:

• Top creative talent;
• The highest quality owned intellectual property;
• Cutting-edge technology; and
• A sound fi nancial footing.

fi

Today, Take-Two possesses all of these attributes and 
is stronger than ever before in every facet of its business. 
We are exceedingly optimistic about our long-term outlook
for growth and profitability.
  We’d like to thank our colleagues for their continued 
dedication and hard work throughout this past year and 
our shareholders for their valued support.

fi

Sincerely,

Strauss Zelnick   
Chairman and Chief Executive Officerfi

TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 2012

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(cid:95)

(cid:134)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 
FORM 10-K 

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012
OR

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 

For the transition period from              to             . 
Commission file number 0-29230 
TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State or Other Jurisdiction of 
Incorporation or Organization)

622 Broadway 

New York, New York
(Address of principal executive offices)

51-0350842
(I.R.S. Employer 
Identification No.)
10012
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (646) 536-2842

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: 

Title of each class
Common Stock, $.01 par value 

Name of each exchange on which registered
NASDAQ Global Select Market 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes (cid:95) No (cid:134)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes (cid:134) No (cid:95)
Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  Registrant  (1) has  filed  all  reports  required  to  be  filed  by  Section 13  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities
uu
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and 
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes (cid:95) No (cid:134)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive 
Data  File  required  to  be  submitted  and  posted  pursuant  to  Rule 405  of  Regulation S-T  (§232.405  of  this  chapter)  during  the  preceding 
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes (cid:95) No (cid:134)
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be 
contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of 
this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  (cid:95)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company.  See  the  definitions  of  “large  accelerated  filer,”  “accelerated  filer,”  and  “smaller  reporting  company”  in  Rule 12b-2  of  the
Exchange Act. (Check one):

a

Large accelerated filer (cid:95)

Accelerated filer (cid:134)

Non-accelerated filer (cid:134)
(Do not check if a smaller reporting 
company) 

Smaller reporting company (cid:134)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes (cid:134) No (cid:95)
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which
the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the Registrant’s
most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $1,080,996,000.
As of May 21, 2012, there were 89,877,335 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding. 

e

Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders 
are incorporated by reference into Part III herein. 

Item 1. 

Business 

Item 1A. 

Risk Factors 

Item 1B. 

Unresolved Staff Comments 

Item 2. 

Properties 

Item 3. 

Legal Proceedings

Item 4. 

Mine Safety Disclosures

INDEX 

PART I

PART II

Item 5. 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity 
Securities

Item 6. 

Selected Financial Data 

Item 7. 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Re

f

sults of Operations 

Item 7A. 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 

Item 8. 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 

Item 9. 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 

Item 9A. 

Controls and Procedures

Item 9B. 

Other Information

Item 10. 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 

Item 11. 

Executive Compensation

PART III

Item 12. 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 

t

Item 13. 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 

Item 14. 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services 

PART IV

Item 15. 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 

Index to Financial Statements 

Signatures

PAGE

1

8

18

19

19

19

19

21

22

40

41

41

41

42

42

42

42

42

42

43

46

82

EXPLANATORY NOTE

On October 25, 2010, the Board of Directors of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or similar 
pronouns) approved a change in the Company’s fiscal year end from October 31 to March 31, as reported in the Company’s 
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 25, 2010. As required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company
filed  a  Transition  Report  on  Form 10-KT  on  December 20,  2010  covering  the  period  from,  and  including  the  financial
information for, the five-month period from November 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010 (the “Transition Period”).

CAUTIONARY NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS 

The  statements  contained  herein  which  are  not  historical  facts  are  considered  forward-looking  statements  under  federal 
securities  laws  and  may  be  identified  by  words  such  as  “anticipates,”  “believes,”  “estimates,”  “expects,”  “intends,” 
“plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “seeks,” “will,” or words of similar meaning and include, but are not limited 
to,  statements  regarding  the  outlook  for  the  Company’s  future  business  and  financial  performance.  Such  forward-looking 
statements are based on the current beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by and information currently
available to them, which are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict.
Actual  outcomes  and  results  may  vary  materially  from  these forward-looking  statements  based  on  a  variety  of  risks  and 
uncertainties  including,  but  not  limited  to,  those  discussed  under  the  heading  “Risk  Factors”  included  in  Part I,  Item 1A 
herein. All forward-looking statements are qualified by these cautionary statements and speak only as of the date they are 
made.  The  Company  undertakes  no  obligation  to  update  any  forward-looking  statement,  whether  as  a  result  of  new 
information, future events or otherwise.

tt

ff

PART I

Item 1.  Business

General 

We  are  a  leading  developer,  marketer  and  publisher  of  interactive  entertainment  for  consumers  around  the  globe.  The
Company develops and publishes products through its two wholly-owned labels Rockstar Games and 2K, which publishes its 
titles  under  the  2K Games,  2K Sports  and  2K Play brands. Our products  are designed  for  console gaming  systems  such  as 
Sony’s  PlayStation®3  (“PS3”) and  PlayStation®2  (“PS2”),  Microsoft’s  Xbox 360®  (“Xbox 360”)  and  Nintendo’s  Wii™ 
(“Wii”); handheld gaming systems such as Nintendo’s DS (“DS”), Nintendo’s 3DS (“3DS”) and Sony’s PlayStation Portable 
(“PSP”); and personal computers including smartphones and tablets. We deliver our products through physical retail, digital
download, online platforms and cloud streaming services.

Video  games  are  a  widespread  and  growing  form  of  mainstream  entertainment.  As  a  result  of  the  widening  popularity  of 
interactive entertainment, the video game market is expected to continue to grow in coming years. Growth is expected to be 
driven  by  games  played  on  traditional  consoles,  mobile  gaming  platforms  such  as  tablets  and  smartphones,  and  online
including  through  social  networks.  Overall,  the  installed  base  of  console  systems  and  handheld  devices  has  continued  to 
expand. According to the “Global Video Game Market Update” published by International Development Group (“IDG”) in 
April 2012, the installed base of console systems and handhelds devices grew to 497.8 million units as of December 2011, an 
increase  of  55.4 million  units  or  13%  from  December 2010,  and  forecasts  that  the  number  will  increase  to  an  estimated
753.0 million units in calendar 2016. Further, according to IDG, global sales of console, handheld, PC software and digital 
gaming segments, inclusive of mobile gaming platforms and online, surpassed $57.2 billion in calendar 2011 and forecasts 
that their annual sales will increase to an estimated $89.3 billion in calendar 2016.

The demographics of the interactive entertainment industry audience have broadened significantly over the past few years,
Essential 
m
with  video  games  becoming  an  increasingly  popular  form  of  mainstream  entertainment.  According  to  the  “2011 
Facts  About  The  Computer  And  Video  Game  Industry”  published  by  Entertainment  Software  Association  (“ESA”),  an 
estimated 72% of all American households play PC or video games. The average game player is 37 years old and has been
actively playing for 12 years. 

hing  high-quality  interactive 
Our  core  strategy  is  to  capitalize  on  the  popularity  of  video  games  by  developing  and  publis
entertainment experiences across a range of genres. We focus on building compelling entertainment franchises by publishing
a select number of titles for which we can create sequels and add-on content. We support the success of our products in the
marketplace through innovative marketing programs and global distribution on all platforms and through all channels that are
relevant to our target audience. 

a

1

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1993 and are headquartered in New York, New York with 
2,235 employees globally. Our telephone number is (646) 536-2842 and our website address is www.take2games.com. We 
make all of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) available free of charge on our website under 
the caption “Corporate—SEC Filings.” Included in these filings are our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,  current  reports  on  Form 8-K  and  amendments  to  those  reports,  which  are  available  as  soon  as  reasonably 
practicable  after  we  electronically  file  or  furnish  such  materials  with  the  SEC  pursuant  to  Section 13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Our website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. You may also obtain copies of our reports without charge by writing to: 

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. 
622 Broadway 
New York, NY 10012
Attn: Investor Relations

You  may  read  and  copy  any  document  we  file  with  the  SEC at  the  SEC’s  public  reference  room  at  100 F  Street,  NE, 
Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the public reference room.
The SEC maintains a website that contains annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy and information statements and other 
information that issuers (including the Company) file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s website is www.sec.gov.

Strategy 

Overview.  We endeavor to be the most creative, innovative and efficient company in our industry. Our core strategy is to
capitalize on the popularity of video games by developing and publishing high-quality interactive entertainment experiences 
across a range of genres. We focus on building compelling entertainment franchises by publishing a select number of titles 
for  which  we  can  create  sequels  and  add-on  content.  Most  of  our  intellectual  property  is  internally  owned  and  developed,
which  we  believe  best  positions  us  financially  and  competitively.  We  have  established  a  portfolio  of  proprietary  software 
content for the major hardware platforms in a wide range of genres, including action, adventure, racing, role-playing, sports
and strategy, which we distribute worldwide. We believe that our commitment to creativity and innovation is a distinguishing
strength,  enabling  us  to  differentiate  our  products  in  the  marketplace  by  combining  advanced  technology  with  compelling 
storylines and characters that provide unique gameplay experiences for consumers. We have created, acquired or licensed a 
group of highly recognizable brands to match the broad consumer demographics we serve, ranging from adults to children
and game enthusiasts to casual gamers. Another cornerstone of our strategy is to support the success of our products in the
marketplace through innovative marketing programs and global distribution on all platforms and through all channels that are
relevant to our target audience.

u

r

Support Label Structure to Target Distinct Market Segments.  Our business consists of our wholly-owned labels Rockstar 
Games and 2K, which publishes its titles under 2K Games, 2K Sports and 2K Play. Each group focuses on distinct product 
genres and target demographics. Rockstar Games is the developer and publisher of the interactive entertainment industry’s 
most  iconic  and  critically  acclaimed  brand, Grand  Theft  Auto,  as well  as  other  successful  franchises  including L.A.  Noire,
Max Payne, Midnight Club, and Red Dead. We expect Rockstar Games to continue to be a leader in the action / adventure
product category and create groundbreaking entertainment by leveraging our existing franchises as well as developing new 
brands. 2K Games is the publisher of the critically acclaimed, multi-million unit selling BioShock, Borderlands, Mafia, and 
Sid Meier’s Civilization franchises. We expect 2K Games to continue to be a leader in the shooter, action, role-playing and 
strategy categories by building on its existing brands, as well as developing new franchises in the future. 2K Sports publishes
NBA 2K,  the  top-ranked  NBA  basketball  vide
o  game  for  11 years  running,  as  well  as  other  sports  titles  including  Major 
League  Baseball 2K  and  Top  Spin.  2K Play  focuses  on  casual  and  family-friendly  games  such  as Carnival  Games,  an
internally  developed  and  owned  franchise,  and  licensed  titles  based  on  popular  Nickelodeon  television  programs.  We  also 
have expansion initiatives in the rapidly growing Asia-Pacific markets, where our strategy is to broaden the distribution of 
our existing products, expand our business in Japan, and establish an online gaming presence, especially in China and Korea.

KK

aa

Focus on Core Strength of Producing Select, High Quality Titles.  We focus on publishing a select number of high-quality 
titles  based  on  internally-owned  and developed  intellectual  property,  which  typically  provide higher  margins  than licensed 
products. We currently own the intellectual property rights of 19 proprietary brands. In addition, we will selectively develop 
titles based on licensed properties, including sports, and also publish externally developed titles. 

2

We  use  a  product  investment  review  process  to  evaluate  potential  titles  for  investment,  to  review  existing  titles  in
development, and to assess titles after release to measure their performance in the market and the return on our investment. 
We  apply  this  process  to  all  of  our  products,  whether  internally  or  externally  developed.  The  product  investment  review 
process  includes  reviews  of  each  project  at  various  stages  of  development  by  our  executive  management  team  and  senior 
management of our publishing labels, and includes coordination between our sales and marketing personnel before the launch
 enhance the competitiveness and profitability of 
of the titles. This disciplined approach to product investment is expected to
our titles. 

d

We develop our products using a combination of our internal and external development resources acting under contract with 
us. We typically select our external developers based on their track record and expertise in developing products in the same 
category or genre. One developer will generally produce the same game for multiple platforms and will also produce sequels 
to  an  original  game.  We  believe  that  selecting  and  using  development  resources  in  this  manner  allows  us  to  leverage  the
particular  expertise  of  our  internal  and  external  development  resources,  which  we  believe  increases  the  quality  of  our 
products. 

Leverage  Emerging  Technologies,  Platforms  and  Distribution  Channels,  Including  Digitally  Delivered  Content.
Interactive  entertainment  played  on  mobile  platforms,  including  tablets  and  smartphones,  and  online  platforms,  including
social  networks,  represent  exciting  opportunities  to  enhance  our  growth  and  prof
ff
itability.  In  addition,  the  interactive
t
entertainment industry is increasingly delivering content through digital download. We are actively investing to capitalize on
these trends in order to diversify our product mix, reduce our operating risks, and increase our revenue. Each of our labels has
released  offerings  for  tablets  and  smartphones  across  a  variety  of  genres.  In  December 2011,  we  released  Grand  Theft 
Auto III: 10th Anniversary Edition, which was our first title for Android and our highest-selling title for Apple’s iOS platform 
to date. In July 2011, we launched our first social gaming experience, 
Sid Meier’s Civilization World, for Facebook, and we
have  several  initiatives  underway  to  develop  online  games  primarily  for  Asian  markets.  We  will  continue  to  invest  in 
emerging  opportunities  in  mobile  and  online  gameplay,  particularly  for  our  wholly-owned  franchises,  as  well  as
downloadable content and micro-transactions, where gamers can pay to download additional content to enhance their game
playing experience. 

d

Expand International Business.  The global market for interactive entertainment continues to grow and we seek to increase
our presence internationally, particularly in Asia, Eastern Europe and Latin America.  We have expansion initiatives in the
Asian markets, where our strategy is to broaden the distribution of our existing products, expand our business in Japan, and 
establish  an  online  gaming  presence,  especially  in  China  and  Korea.  We  are  a  direct  publisher  in  Japan  and  Korea. 
Historically, we distributed our products in Asia through license agreements with local publishers in Japan and Korea, and 
distribution  agreements  with local  distributors of finished goods  elsewhere  in Asia. While  we  retain  title  to  all  intellectual 
property,  under  license  agreements  local  publishers  are  responsible  for  localization  of  software  content,  distribution  and 
marketing of the products in their respective local markets. We intend to con
tinue to build upon our licensing relationships 
and also expand finished goods distribution strategies to grow our international business. 

r

Our Publishing and Software Development Businesses

Revenue  in our  publishing  business  is primarily  derived  from  the  sale  of  internally  developed software  titles  and  software 
titles developed by third-parties for our benefit. Operating margins in our publishing business are dependent in part upon our 
ability to continually release new, commercially successful products and to manage software product development costs. We
have internal development studios located in Australia, Canada, China, Czech Republic, the United Kingdom and the United 
States. As of March 31, 2012, we had a research and development staff of 1,653 employees with the technical capabilities to 
develop software titles for all major current and prior generation consoles, handheld hardware platforms and PCs in multiple 
languages and territories. 

Operating margins associated with our externally developed titles, or titles for which we do not own the intellectual property,
are  generally  lower  because  they  require  us  to  acquire  licenses,  provide  minimum  development  guarantees,  and  pay
third-party royalties. Agreements with third-party developers generally give us exclusive publishing and marketing rights and 
require us to make development payments, pay royalties based on product sales and satisfy other conditions. Development 
payments for software titles are typically recoupable against royalties otherwise due to developers based on software sales. 
Our agreements with third-party developers generally provide us with the right to monitor development efforts and to cease 
making development payments if specified development milestones are not satisfied. We also regularly monitor the level of 
development payments in light of expected sales for the related titles.

3

The development cycle for our titles generally ranges from 12 to more than 24 months and our top-selling titles could take up 
to  3 years  or  longer  to  develop.  Although  we  often  simultaneously  develop  our  software  for  multiple  platforms,  in  certain 
cases  it  can  take  9  to  12 months  to  adapt  a  product  for  additional  hardware  platforms  after  initial  development  for  one 
platform is completed. The cost to develop a frontline software title generally ranges from $10 million to $60 million, with
our  top  titles  exceeding  these  amounts.  We  expect  that  development  costs  and  time  will  continue  to  increase  for  current 
generation platforms.

We continue to explore evolving business models such as downloadable content, online gaming and micro-transactions. We
expect downloadable content to become more prevalent as broadband connectivity continues to gain popularity and digital 
delivery  platforms  such  as  Microsoft’s  Xbox  LIVE® Marketplace  (“Xbox  LIVE”)  and  the  Sony  Entertainment  Network 
, where our strategy is to
(“SEN”) gain additional customers. We also have expansion initiatives in the Asia-Pacific markets
broaden  the  distribution  of  our  existing  products,  expand  our  business  in  Japan,  and  establish  an  online  gaming  presence, 
especially in China and Korea.

aa

Rockstar  Games.   Software  titles  published  by  our  Rockstar  Games  label  are  primarily  internally  developed.  We  expect 
Rockstar  Games,  our  wholly-owned  publisher  of  the  Grand  Theft  Auto, Max  Payne, Midnight  Club, Red  Dead  and  other 
popular  franchises,  to  continue  to  be  a  leader  in  the  action /  adventure  product  category  and  create  groundbreaking 
entertainment by leveraging our existing titles as well as developing new brands. We believe that Rockstar has established a
uniquely  original,  popular  cultural  phenomenon  with  its Grand  Theft  Auto series,  which  we  believe  is  the  interactive 
entertainment  industry’s  most  iconic  and  critically  acclaimed  brand  and  has  sold-in  approximately  120 million  units.
Rockstar continues to expand on our established franchises by releasing sequels, as well as offering downloadable episodes 
and content. In May 2011, Rockstar released the commercially successful and critically acclaimed L.A. Noire, which became
the  first  video  game  ever  chosen  as  an  official  selection  of  the  Tribeca  Film  Festival.  Rockstar  has  released  several
downloadable  content  packs  to  support  that  title.  Rockstar  is  also  well  known  for  developing  brands  in  other  genres,
including the Bully and Manhunt franchises. 

2K.  Our 2K label publishes its titles under 2K Games, 2K Sports and 2K Play:

2K Games.  2K Games has published a variety of popular entertainment properties across multiple genres and platforms and 
we expect 2K Games to continue to develop new and successful franchises in the future. 2K Games’ internally owned and 
ff
developed  franchises  include  the  critically  acclaimed,  multi-million  unit  selling BioShock, Mafia,  and  Sid  Meier’s
Civilization series.  2K Games  has  also  published  titles  that  were  externally  developed,  such  as Borderlands,  which  has
become  a  key  franchise  for  2K Games  since  its  launch  in  October 2009  and  has  been  supported  by  several  successful 
downloadable content packs.

2K Sports.  2K Sports publishes realistic sports simulation titles, including our flagship NBA 2K series, which has been the
top-ranked NBA basketball video game for 11 years running, the Major League Baseball 2K series, and our Top Spin tennis 
series. We develop  most  of our  2K Sports software  titles  through our  internal development  studios. 2K Sports has secured 
long-term licensing agreements with the National Basketball Association (“NBA”). Our current licenses with Major League 
Baseball Properties, the Major League Baseball Players Association and Major League Baseball Advanced Media expire in
fiscal 2013. 

t

We also have expansion initiatives in the rapidly growing Asia markets, where our strategy is to broaden the distribution of 
our existing products, expand our business in Japan, and establish an online gaming presence, especially in China and Korea.
2K Sports has secured a multi-year license from the NBA to develop an online version of the NBA simulation game in China, 
Taiwan, South Korea and Southeast Asia.

2K Play.  2K Play focuses on developing and publishing titles for the casual and family-friendly games market. 2K Play titles 
are developed by both internal development studios and third-party developers. Internally developed titles include Carnival 
Games  and Let’s  Cheer!.  2K Play  also  has  a  partnership  with  Nickelodeon  to  publish  video  games  based  on  its  top  rated 
Nick Jr.  titles  such  as Dora  the  Explorer; Go,  Diego,  Go!; Ni Hao,  Kai-lan  and  The  Backyardigans.  We  expect 
family-oriented gaming to continue to be a component of our business in the future. 

Discontinued operations 

In  February 2010,  we  completed  the  sale  to  SYNNEX  Corporation  (“Synnex”)  of  our  Jack  of  All  Games  third-party
distribution business, which primarily distributed third-party interactive entertainment software, hardware and accessories in 
North America for approximately $44.0 million, including $37.3 million in cash, subject to purchase price adjustments, and 
up to an additional $6.7 million, subject to the achievement of certain items, which were not met. In April 2011, we settled on

t

4

the  purchase  price  adjustments  and  as  a  result  the  purchase  price  was  lowered  by  $1.5 million.  Consequently,  the  net 
purchase price after the settlement was $35.8 million. The financial results of this business, which were previously reported 
as our distribution business, have been classified as discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements
 of Operations for 
all  periods  presented.  The  assets  and  liabilities  of  this  business  are  reflected  as assets  and  liabilities  of  discontinued 
operations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements 
for additional information regarding discontinued operations. 

uu

Intellectual Property 

Our business is highly dependent on the creation, acquisition, licensing and protection of intellectual property. Some of the 
intellectual  property  rights  we  have  created  or  acquired  for  our  internally-owned  portfolio  of  brands  are: BioShock, Bully,
Carnival  Games, The  Darkness, Grand  Theft  Auto, L.A. Noire, Mafia, Manhunt, Max  Payne,   Midnight  Club, Red  Dead,
Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis, Sid Meier’s Civilization, Sid Meier’s Pirates!, Spec Ops, and Top Spin. We believe
that  content  ownership  facilitates  our  internal  product  development  efforts  and  maximizes  profit  potential.  We  attempt  to 
protect  our  software  and  production  techniques  under  copyright,  trademark  and  trade  secret  laws  as  well  as  through 
contractual  restrictions  on  disclosure,  copying  and  distribution.  Although  we  generally  do  not  hold  any  patents,  we  obtain 
trademark and copyright registrations for many of our products. 

We also enter into content license agreements, such as those with sports leagues and players associations, movie studios and 
performing talent, music labels and musicians. These licenses are typically limited to use of the licen
sed rights in products forff
specific  time  periods.  In  addition,  we  license  and  include console  manufacturer  technology in  our  products  on  a  non-
exclusive basis, which allows our games to be played on their respective hardware systems. 

yy

Manufacturing

Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo either manufacture or control selection of approved manufacturers of software products sold 
for use on their respective hardware platforms. We place a purchase order for the manufacture of our products with Sony,
the manufacturer, together with related 
Microsoft or Nintendo and then send software code and a prototype of the product to
artwork,  user  instructions,  warranty  information,  brochures and  packaging  designs  for  approval,  defect  testing  and 
manufacture. Games are generally shipped within two to three weeks of receipt of our purchase order and all materials. 

tt

u
Production of PC software is performed by third-party vendors in accordance with ou
r specifications and includes CD-ROM / 
y
DVD-ROM pressing, assembly of components, printing of packaging and user manuals and shipping of finished goods. We 
send  software  code  and  a  prototype  of  a  title,  together  with  related  artwork, user  instructions,  warranty  information, 
brochures  and  packaging  designs  to  the  manufacturers.  Games  are  generally  shipped  within  two  weeks  of  receipt  of  our 
manufacturing order. 

We occasionally experience difficulties or delays in the manufacture of our titles; however such 
delays have not significantly
harmed  our  business  to  date.  We  have  not  experienced  material  delays  due  to  manufacturing  defects.  Our  software  titles 
typically carry a 90-day limited warranty.

tt

Sales

We  sell  software  titles  to  retail  outlets  in  North  America,  Europe  and  Asia  through  direct  relationships  with  large  retail 
t
customers  and  third-party  distributors.  Our  customers  in  North America  include  leading  mass  merchandisers  such as Wal-
Mart; specialty retailers such as GameStop; electronics stores such as Best Buy; toy stores such as Toys “R” Us; national and 
regional  drug  stores;  rental  outlets;  and  supermarket  and  discount  store  chains.  Our  European  customers  include  Game,
GameStop,  GEM  Distribution  and  Media  Markt.  We  have  sales  operations  in  Asia,  Australia,  Austria,  Canada,  France, 
Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States.

We  are  dependent  on  a  limited  number  of  customers  that  account for  a  significant  portion  of  our  sales.  Sales  to  our  five
largest customers during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 accounted for approximately 43.9% of our net revenue, with
GameStop and Wal-Mart accounting for 19.0% and 10.7%, respectively. No other customer accounted for more than 10.0% 
of our net revenue during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012. 

t

We  also  digitally  distribute  our  titles,  downloadable  content  and  micro-transactions  direct  to  consoles  and  PCs,  including
smartphones  and  tablets.  We  view  digital  distribution  as  an  important  growth  opportunity  for  our  industry  and  Company; 
however, we continue to expect that packaged goods and traditional retailers will be the primary channel for the sale of our 
products for the foreseeable future.

5

Marketing

Our  marketing  and  promotional  efforts  are  intended  to  maximize  consumer  interest  in  our  titles,  promote  brand  name 
recognition of our franchises, assist retailers and properly position, package and merchandise our titles. 

We market titles by: 

• 

• 

• 

Implementing public relations campaigns, using print and online advertising, television, radio spots and outdoor 
advertising. We believe that we label and market our products in accordance with the applicable principles and 
guidelines of the Entertainment Software Rating Board, or the ESRB, an independent self-regulatory body that 
assigns ratings and enforces advertising guidelines for the interactive software industry.

r

Satisfying certain shelf life and sales requirements under our agreements with hardware manufacturers in order 
to qualify for Sony’s Greatest Hits Programs and Microsoft’s Platinum Hits Program. In connection with these 
programs, we receive manufacturing discounts from Sony and Microsoft. 

Stimulating continued sales by reducing the wholesale prices of our products to retailers at various times during
the life of a product. Price concessions may occur at any time in a product’s life cycle, but typically occur three
to nine months after a product’s initial launch. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010,
five  months  ended  March 31,  2010  and  fiscal  year  ended  October 31,  2009,  price  concessions  to  retailers 
amounted  to  $86.0 million,  $59.9 million,  $61.1 million,  $53.2 million  and  $49.4 million,  respectively.  In
certain international markets, we also provide volume rebates to stimulate continued product sales.

•  Employing various other marketing methods designed to promote consumer awareness, including social media, 
in-store promotions and point-of-purchase displays, direct mail, co-operative advertising, as well as attendance 
at trade shows.

In  addition  to  our  media,  retail  and  public  relations  campaigns,  an  important  part of  our  marketing  strategy  leverages
evolving  business  models,  such  as  downloadable  add-on  content  for  our  front  line  titles.  Add-on  content  generates 
incremental  revenues  and  also  helps  to  prolong  consumer  engagement  with  our  titles,  which  extends  the  life  of  each  new
release and enhances the value of our franchises. As of March 31, 2012, we had a sales and marketing staff of 283 people.

Product Procurement 

We procure products from suppliers principally using standard purchase orders based on our assessment of market demand,
as well as pre-orders from retailers. We carry inventory quantities that we believe are necessary to provide rapid response to
retailer orders. We utilize electronic data interchange with many of our customers to enhance the efficiency of placing and 
shipping orders and receiving payments. 

Competition

In our publishing business, we compete with:

•  Companies that range in size and cost structure from very small with limited resources to very large companies
with  greater  financial,  marketing  and  technical  personnel  and  other  resources  than  ours,  including  Activision 
Blizzard,  Electronic  Arts  and  THQ,  and  international  companies,  such  as  Capcom,  Konami,  Namco-Bandai,
SEGA, Square Enix and Ubisoft. 

• 

Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo for licenses to properties and the sale of interactive entertainment software, each
of which is a large developer and marketer of software for its own platforms. Each of these competitors has the 
financial  resources  to  withstand  significant  price  competition  and  to  implement  extensive  advertising 
campaigns. 

•  Other software, hardware, entertainment and media for limited retail shelf space and promotional resources. The
competition  is  intense  among  an  increasing  number  of  newly  introduced  entertainment  software  titles  and 
hardware for adequate levels of shelf space and promotional support. 

6

•  Other forms of entertainment such as motion pictures, television and audio, online computer programs and other

forms of entertainment which may be less expensive or provide other advantages to consumers. 

Competition in the entertainment software industry is based on innovation, features, playability, and product quality; brand 
name  recognition;  compatibility  with  popular  platforms;  access  to  distribution  channels;  price;  marketing;  and  customer 
service. Our business is driven by hit titles, which require increasing budgets for development and marketing. Competition
for our titles is influenced by the timing of competitive product releases and the similarity of such products to our titles and
may result in loss of shelf space or a reduction in sell-through of our titles at retail stores.

n

Trends and Factors Affecting our Business 

Product  Release  Schedule.    Our  financial  results  are  affected  by  the  timing  of  our  product  releases  and  the  commercial 
success of those titles. Our Grand Theft Auto products in particular have historically accounted for a substantial portion of 
our revenue. Sales of Grand Theft Auto products generated approximately 13.8% of the Company’s net revenue for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2012. The timing of our Grand Theft Auto releases varies significantly, which in turn may affect our 
financial performance on a quarterly and annual basis. 

u

Economic Environment and Retailer Performance.  We continue to monitor economic conditions that may unfavorably affect 
our businesses, such as deteriorating consumer demand, pricing pressure on our products, credit quality of our receivables,
and  foreign  currency  exchange  rates.  Our  business  is  dependent  upon  a  limited  number  of  customers  who  account  for  a 
significant portion of our revenue. Our five largest customers accounted fo
r 43.9%, 43.8%, 59.8%, 55.7%, and 56.4% of net 
revenue  during  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2012,  2011  and 2010,  five  months  ended  March 31,  2010  and  fiscal  year
ended October 31, 2009, respectively. As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, our five largest customers accounted for 61.3% and 
54.2% of our gross accounts receivable, respectively. Customers that individually accounted for more than 10% of our gross 
accounts  receivable  balance  comprised  40.6%  and  38.2%  of  such  balances  at  March 31,  2012  and 2011,  respectively.  The
economic environment has affected our customers in the past, and may do so in the future. Bankruptcies or consolidations of 
our large retail customers could seriously hurt our business, due to uncollectible accounts receivables and the concentration
of purchasing power among the remaining large retailers. Certain of our large customers sell used copies of our games, which 
may negatively affect our business by reducing demand for new copies of our games. While the downloadable episodes that 
we now offer for certain of our titles may serve to reduce used game sales, we expect used game sales to continue to affect 
our business.

Hardware Platforms.  The majority of our products are made for the hardware platforms developed by three companies—
Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo. Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Segment and Geographic Information,”
discloses  that  Sony,  Microsoft  and  Nintendo  hardware platforms  comprised  approximately  89.4%  of  the  Company’s  net 
revenue by product platform for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012. The success of our business is dependent upon the 
consumer  acceptance  of  these  platforms  and  the  continued  growth  in  the  installed  base  of  these  platforms.  When  new 
eclines, which may negatively affect our 
d
hardware platforms are introduced, demand for software based on older platforms d
business.  Additionally,  our development  costs  are generally higher for  titles  based  on new  platforms,  and  we  have limited 
ability to predict the consumer acceptance of the new platforms, which may affect our sales and profitability. As a result, we 
believe it is important to focus our development efforts on a select number of titles, which is consistent with our strategy.

Online Content and Digital Distribution.  The interactive entertainment software industry is delivering a growing amount of 
content through digital online delivery methods. We provide a variety of online delivered products and services. A number of 
our titles that are available through retailers as packaged goods products are also available through direct digital download 
through the Internet (from websites we own and others owned by third-parties). We also offer downloadable add-on content 
Sid  Meier’s
to  our  packaged  goods  titles.  In  addition,  in  July 2011,  we  launched  our first  social  gaming  experience,
Civilization  World,  for  Facebook,  and  we  have  several  initiatives  underway  to  develop  online  games  primarily  for  Asian
markets. We expect online delivery of games and game services to become an increasing part of our business over the long-
term.

y

r

International Operations 

International  sales  are  a  significant  part  of  our  business.  For  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2012,  2011  and 2010,  five 
months  ended  March 31,  2010  and  fiscal  year  ended  October 31,  2009,  approximately  45.6%,  45.5%,  40.4%,  35.6%  and 
42.8%, respectively, of our net revenue was earned outside the United States. We have also expanded our Asian operations in
an effort to increase our geographical scope and diversify our revenue base. We are subject to risks inherent in foreign trade,
including  increased  credit  risks,  tariffs  and  duties,  fluctuations  in  foreign  currency  exchange  rates,  shipping  delays  and 
international  political,  regulatory  and  economic  developments,  all  of  which  can  have  a  significant  effect  on  our  operating
results. See Notes 1 and 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 

7

Segment and Geographic Information

See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Employees 

As of March 31, 2012, we had 2,235 full-time employees, of which 1,140 were employed outside of the United States. None
of  our  employees  are  subject  to  collective  bargaining  agreements.  We  consider  our  relations  with  employees  to  be 
satisfactory.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Our business is subject to many risks and uncertainties, which may affect our future financial performance. Because of the
risks and uncertainties described below, as well as other factors affecting our operating results and financial condition, past
financial  performance  should  not  be  considered  to  be  a  reliable  indicator  of  future  performance  and  our  business  and 
financial performance could be harmed and the market value of our securities could decline.

Risks relating to our business 

We are dependent on the future success of our Grand Theft Auto products and we must continue to publish “hit” titles or 
sequels to such “hit” titles in order to compete successfully in our industry.

t

Grand Theft Auto and certain of our other titles are “hit” products and have historically accounted for a substantial portion of 
our revenue. Sales of Grand Theft Auto products generated approximately 13.8% of the Company’s net revenue for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2012 and the ten best-selling titles (including Grand Theft Auto) that significantly contributed to the
Company’s net revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 in the aggregate accounted for approximately 89.7% of the 
Company’s net revenue. If we fail to continue to develop and sell new commercially successful “hit” titles or sequels to such
e commercial release of our “hit” titles or
“hit” titles or experience any delays in product releases or disruptions following th
their  sequels, our revenue  and  profits  may  decrease  substantially  and we  may  incur losses.  In  addition,  competition  in our 
industry is intense and a relatively small number of hit titles account for a large portion of total revenue in our industry. Hit
products  offered  by  our  competitors  may  take  a  larger  share  of  consumer  spending  than  we  anticipate,  which  could  cause
revenue generated from our products to fall below our expectations. If our competitors develop more successful products or 
services  at  lower  price  points  or  based  on  payment  models  perceived  as  offering  better  value,  or  if  we  do  not  continue  to 
develop  consistently  high  quality  and  well-received  products  and  services,  our  revenue  and  profitability  may  decline.  In
addition, both the online and mobile games marketplaces are characterized by frequent product introductions, relatively low 
barriers  to  entry,  and  new  and  evolving  business  methods,  technologies  and  platforms for  development.  Widespread 
consumer adoption of these new platforms for games and other technological advances in online or mobile game offerings
could negatively affect our sales of console and traditional PC products before we have an opportunity to develop profitable
businesses in such markets. 

We  are  subject  to  product  development  risks  which  could  result  in  delays  and  additional  costs,  and  we  must  adapt  to
changes in software technologies.

We depend on our internal development studios and third-party software developers to develop new interactive entertainment 
software  within  anticipated  release  schedules  and  cost  projections.  The  development  cycle  for  new  titles  generally  ranges
from 12 to more than 24 months, and our top-selling titles could take up to 3 years or longer to develop. Development times
and  costs  of  current  generation  software  have  increased  substantially  as  a  result  of  the  additional  and  enhanced  features
available in the newest games. Further, after development of a product it may take between 9 and 12 additional months to 
develop  the  product  for  other  hardware  platforms.  If  our  third-party  software  developers  experience  unanticipated 
development delays, financial difficulties or additional costs we will not be able to release titles according to our schedule
and at budgeted costs. Certain of our licensing and marketing agreements also contain provisions that would impose penalties 
if we fail to meet agreed upon game release dates. There can be no assurance that our products will be sufficiently successful 
so that we can recoup these costs or make a profit on these products.

aa

Additionally, in order to stay competitive, our internal development studios must anticipate and adapt to rapid technological
changes  affecting  software  development.  Any  inability  to  respond  to  technological  advances  and  implement  new
technologies could render our products obsolete or less marketable.

8

The inability of our products to achieve significant market acceptance, delays in product releases or disruptions following 
the commercial release of our products may have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

New products may not achieve significant market acceptance, generate sufficient sales or be introduced in a timely manner to
permit us to recover development, manufacturing and marketing cost
s associated with these products. The life cycle of a title
generally involves a relatively high level of sales during the first few months after introduction followed by a rapid decline in
sales. Because revenue associated with an initial product launch generally constitutes a high percentage of the total revenue 
associated  with  the  life  of  a  product,  delays  in  product  releases  or  disruptions  following  the  commercial  release  of  one  or 
more  new  products  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  operating  results  and  cause  our  operating  results  to  be
materially different from our expectations.

ff

Our business is subject to the continued popularity of current generation video game platforms and our ability to develop 
commercially successful products for these platforms.

We derive most of our revenue from the sale of products made for video game platforms manufactured by third-parties, such
as Sony’s PS3, Microsoft’s Xbox 360 and Nintendo’s Wii. Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Segment and 
Geographic Information,” discloses that Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo hardware platforms comprised approximately 89.4% 
of the Company’s net revenue by product platform for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012. The success of our business is
subject to the continued popularity of these platforms and our ability to develop commercially successful products for these
platforms.

Connectivity issues related to digital delivery platforms could affect our ability to sell and provide online services for our 
products and could affect our profitability. 

ff

We rely upon third-party digital delivery platforms, such as Xbox Live and SEN, to provide connectivity from the consumer 
to our digital products and our online services. Connectivity issues could prevent customers from accessing this content and 
our ability to successfully market and sell our products could be adversely affected. In addition, we could experience similar 
issues related to services we host on our internal servers. Such issues also could affect our ability to provide online services
and could affect our business. 

Our business could be adversely affected if our consumer data protection measures are not seen as adequate or there are 
breaches of our security measures or unintended disclosures of our consumer data.

We  are  collecting  and  storing  consumer  information,  including  personal  information  and  credit  card  information.  We  take
measures to protect our consumer data from unauthorized access or disclosure. It is possible that our security controls over 
consumer data may not prevent the improper access or disclosure of personally identifiable information. In addition, due to 
the high profile nature of our products, we may draw a disproportionately higher amount of attention and attempts to breach
our  security  controls  than  companies  with  lower  profile  products.  A  security  breach  that  leads  to  disclosure  of  consumer 
account  information  (including  personally  identifiable  information)  could  harm  our  reputation,  compel  us  to  comply  with 
disparate breach notification laws in various jurisdictions and otherwise subject us to liability under laws that protect personal
data, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue. A resulting perception that our products or services do not adequately
protect the privacy of personal information could result in a loss of current or potential consumers and business partners. In 
addition,  if  any  of  our  business  partners  experience  a  security  breach  that  leads  to  disclosure  of  consumer  account 
information, our reputation could be harmed, resulting in loss of revenue. 

r

The  interpretation  and  application  of  consumer  and  data  protection  laws  in  the  U.S.,  Europe  and  elsewhere  are  often 
uncertain,  contradictory  and  in  flux.  It  is  possible  that  these  laws  may  be  interpreted  and  applied  in  a  manner  that  is 
inconsistent with our data practices. If so, this could result in government imposed fines or orders requiring that we change 
our data practices, which could have an adverse effect on our business. Complying with these various laws could cause us to 
incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business. 

In  addition,  certain  of  our  products  are  online-enabled.  The  ability  of  our  products to  offer  online  functionality,  and  our 
ability  to  offer  content  through  a  video  game  platform’s  digital  distribution  channel,  is  dependent  upon  the  continued 
operation and security of such platform’s online network. These third-party networks, as well as our own internal systems
and websites, and the security measures related thereto may be breached as a result of third-party action, including intentiona
l
misconduct by computer hackers, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, and result in someone obtaining unauthorized
access to our customers’ data or our data, including our intellectual property and other confidential business information, or 
our  information  technology  systems.  Because  the  techniques  used  to  obtain  unauthorized  access,  or  to  sabotage  systems,
change  frequently  and  generally  are  not  recognized  until  launched  against  a  target,  we  may  be  unable  to  anticipate  these

aa

a

9

techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. If an actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, we may
lose  business,  suffer  irreparable  damage  to  our  reputation,  and/or  incur  significant  costs  and  expenses  relating  to  the
investigation and possible litigation of claims relating to such event.

r

Security breaches involving the source code for our products could adversely affect our revenues.

We  securely  store  the  source  code  for  our  interactive  entertainment  software  products  as  it  is  created.  A  breach,  whether 
physical, electronic or otherwise, of the systems on which such source code and other sensitive data are stored could lead to 
damage or piracy of our software. If we are subject to data security breaches, we may have a loss in sales or increased costs 
arising from the restoration or implementation of additional security measures which could materially and adversely affect 
ade  secrets  and  other  confidential  business 
our  profitability.  Any  theft  and/or unauthorized  use  or  publication  of  our  tr
information as a result of such an event could adversely affect our competitive position, reputation, brand and future sales of
our  products.  Our  business  could  be  subject  to  significant  disruption,  and  we  could  suffer  monetary  and  other  losses  and 
reputational harm, in the event of such incidents and claims. 

r

t
If we are unable to sustain launch pricing on current generation titles, our operating results may suffer.

The  interactive  entertainment  software  and  hardware  industry is  characterized  by  the  introduction  of  new  and  enhanced 
generations of products and evolving industry standards. Current generation titles for the PS3, Xbox 360 and Wii have been 
offered at premium retail prices since the launch of such consoles. We expect to continue to price current generation titles at a 
premium level. However, circumstances may arise in which we may need to reduce prices for such titles. If we are unable to 
sustain launch pricing on these current generation titles, it will have a material adverse effect on our margins, profitability and 
operating results. 

y

t

We depend on our key management and product development personnel. 

Our  continued  success  will  depend  to  a  significant  extent  on  our  senior  management  team  and  our  relationship  with 
ZelnickMedia  Corporation (“ZelnickMedia”).  Our  Executive  Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Operating 
Officer are partners of ZelnickMedia. We are also highly dependent on the expertise, skills and knowledge of certain of our 
Rockstar employees and other key creative personnel responsible for content creation and development of our Grand Theft 
Auto titles and titles based on other brands. We may not be able to continue to retain th
ese personnel at current compensation 
levels, or at all. 

a

f

The loss of the services of our executive officers, ZelnickMedia, our key 
Rockstar employees or other key creative personnel
could  significantly  harm  our  business.  In addition,  if  one  or  more  key  employees  were  to  join  a  competitor  or  form a 
competing company, we may lose additional personnel, experience material interruptions in product development, delays in
bringing  products  to  market  and  difficulties in  our  relationships  with  licensors, suppliers  and  customers,  which  would 
significantly harm our business. Failure to continue to attract and retain other qualified management and creative personnel
could adversely affect our business and prospects. 

Declines in consumer spending and other adverse changes in the economy could have a material adverse effect on our 
business and operating results. 

y

Most  of  our  products  involve  discretionary  spending  on  the  part  of  consumers.  We  believe  that  consumer  spending  is 
influenced by general economic conditions and the availability of discretionary income. This makes our products particularly 
sensitive to general economic conditions and economic cycles as consumers are generally more willing to make discretionary 
purchases, including purchases of products like ours, during periods in which favorable economic conditions prevail. Adverse
economic  conditions  such  as  a  prolonged U.S. or  international general economic  downturn,  including periods of  increased 
inflation,  unemployment  levels,  tax  rates,  interest  rates,  energy  prices  or  declining  consumer  confidence  could  also  reduce
consumer  spending.  Reduced  consumer  spending  has  and  may  continue  to  result  in  reduced  demand  for  our  products  and 
may also require increased selling and promotional expenses, which has had and may continue to have an adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and operating results. Furthermore, uncertainty and adverse changes in the economy could 
also  increase  the  risk  of  material  losses  on  our  investments,  increase  costs  associated  with  developing  and  publishing  our 
products,  increase  the  cost  and  availability  of  sources  of  financing,  and  increase  our  exposure  to  material  losses  from  bad 
debts,  any  of  which  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  financial  condition  and  operating  results.  If  economic
conditions worsen, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected.

10 

Our quarterly operating results are dependent on the release of “hit” titles and are highly seasonal which may cause our 
quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly.

We have experienced and may continue to experience wide fluctuations in quarterly operating results. The release of a “hit”
title typically leads to a high level of sales during the first few months after introduction followed by a rapid decline in sales.
In addition, the interactive entertainment industry is highly seasonal, with sales typically higher during the fourth calendar 
quarter, due primarily to increased demand for games during the holiday season. Demand for and sales of our sports titles are 
also seasonal in that they are typically released just prior to the start of the sport season which they depict. If a key event or 
sports  season  to  which  our  product  release  schedule  is  tied  were  to  be  delayed  or  cancelled,  our  sales  would  also  suffer 
disproportionately.  Our  failure  or  inability  to  produce  “hit”  titles  or  introduce  products on  a  timely  basis  to  meet  seasonal 
fluctuations in demand could adversely affect our business and operating results. The uncertainties associated with software
development, manufacturing lead times, production delays and the approval process for products by hardware manufacturers 
and other licensors make it difficult to predict the quarter in which our products will ship and therefore may cause us to fail to
meet financial expectations. 

t

Returns of our published titles by our customers and price concessions granted to our customers may adversely affect our 
operating results. 

We  are  exposed  to  the  risk  of  product  returns  and  price  concessions  with  respect  to  our  customers.  Our  distribution
arrangements with customers generally do not give them the right to return titles to us or to cancel firm orders. However, we
sometimes  accept  product  returns  from  our  distribution  customers  for  stock  balancing  and  negotiate  accommodations  for 
customers, which include credits and returns, when demand for specific products falls below expectations. We accept returns 
and  grant  price  concessions  in  connection with  our  publishing  arrangements  and  revenue  is recognized  after  deducting
estimated reserves for returns and price concessions. While we believe that we can reliably estimate future returns and price
concessions, if return rates and price concessions for our products exceed our reserves, our revenue could decline. 

Increased sales of used video game products could lower our sales. 

Certain  of  our  larger  customers  sell  used  video  games,  which  are  generally  priced  lower  than  new  video  games.  If  our 
customers continue to increase their sales of used video games, it could negatively affect our sales of new video games and 
have an adverse influence on our operating results. 

A  limited  number  of  customers  account  for  a significant  portion  of  our  sales.  The  loss  of  a  principal  customer  could 
seriously hurt our business.

A  substantial  portion  of  our  product  sales  are  made  to  a  limited  number  of  customers.  Sales  to  our  five  largest  customers 
during  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2012  accounted  for  approximately  43.9%  of  our  net  revenue,  with  GameStop  and
Wal-Mart accounting for 19.0% and 10.7%, respectively. Our sales are made primarily pursuant to purchase orders without 
long-term agreements or other commitments, and our customers may terminate their relationship with us at any time. Certain
of  our  customers  may  decline  to  carry  products  containing  mature  content.  The  lo
ss  of  our  relationships  with  principal
customers or a decline in sales to principal customers, including as a result of a product being rated “AO” (age 18 and over), 
could  materially  adversely  affect  our  business  and  operating  results.  Furthermore,  our  customers  may  also  be  placed  into
bankruptcy, become insolvent or be liquidated due to economic downturns, global contractions of credit or for other factors.
Bankruptcies  or  consolidations  of  certain  large  retail  customers  could  seriously  hurt  our  business,  including  as  a  result  of 
uncollectible  accounts  receivable  from  such  customers  and  the  concentration  of  purchasing  power  among  remaining  large
retailers. In addition, our results of operations may be adversely affected if certain of our customers who purchase on credit 
terms  are  no  longer  eligible  to  purchase  on such  terms  due  to  their  financial  di
stress,  which  may  reduce  the  quantity  of 
products they demand from us. 

n

d

If our marketing and advertising efforts fail to resonate with our customers, our business and operating results could be
adversely affected.

Our products are marketed worldwide through a diverse spectrum of advertising and promotional programs such as television
and online advertising, print advertising, retail merchandising, website development and event sponsorship. Our ability to sell
our  products  and  services  is  dependent  in  part  on  the  success  of  these  programs.  If  the  marketing  for  our  products  and 
services  fails  to  resonate  with  our  customers,  particularly  during  the  holiday  season  or  other  key  selling  periods,  or  if 
advertising  rates  or  other  media  placement  costs  increase,  these  factors  could  have  a  material  adverse  influence  on  our 
business and operating results. 

11 

The interactive entertainment software industry is highly competitive. 

e

tt

We  compete  for  both  licenses  to  properties  and  the  sale  of  interactive  entertainment  software  with  Sony,  Microsoft  and 
Nintendo, each of which is a large developer and marketer of software for its own platforms. We also compete with domestic 
game  publishers,  such  as  Activision  Blizzard,  Electronic  Arts  and  THQ  and  international  publishers,  such  as  Capcom,
Konami, Namco-Bandai, SEGA, Square Enix and Ubisoft. As our business is dependent upon our ability to develop hit titles,
which  require  increasing  budgets  for  development  and  marketing,  the  availability  of  significant  financial  resources  has 
become  a  major  competitive  factor  in  developing  and  marketing  software  games.  Some  of  our  competitors  have  greater 
financial,  technical,  personnel  and  other  resources  than  we  do  and  are  able  to  finance  larger  budgets  for  development  and 
marketing and make higher offers to licensors and developers for commercially desirable properties. Our titles also compete
with other forms of entertainment, such as social media and casual games, in addition to motion pictures, television and audio 
and  video  products  featuring  similar  themes,  online  computer  programs  and  other  entertainment,  which  may  be  less
expensive or provide other advantages to consumers. 

u

A  number  of  software  publishers  who  compete  with  us  have  developed  and  commercialized  or  are  currently  developing
online  games  for  use  by  consumers  over  the  Internet.  If  technological  advances  significantly  increase  the  availability  of 
online  games  and  if  consumer  acceptance  of  online  gaming  grows  substantially,  it  could  result  in  a  decline  in  our 
platform-based software sales and negatively affect sales of such products.

Increased  competition  for  limited  shelf  space  and  promotional  support  from  retailers  could  affect  the  success  of  our 
business and require us to incur greater expenses to market our titles. 

Retailers have limited shelf space and promotional resources and competition is intense among newly introduced interactive
entertainment software titles for adequate levels of shelf space and promotional support. Competition for retail shelf space is
expected  to  continue  to  increase,  which  may  require us  to  increase  our  marketing  expenditures  to  maintain  desirable  sales 
levels of our titles. Competitors with more extensive lines and more popular titles may have greater bargaining power with
retailers. Accordingly, we may not be able, or we may have to pay more than our competitors, to achieve similar levels of 
promotional support and shelf space. 

t

Our business is dependent on our ability to enter into successful software development arrangements with third-parties.

Our success depends on our ability to continually identify and develop new titles on a timely basis. We rely on third-party
software developers for the development of some of our titles. Quality third-party developers are continually in high demand.
Software  developers  who  have  developed  titles  for  us  in  the  past  may  not  be  available  to  develop  software  for  us  in  the
future. Due to the limited number of third-party software developers and the limited control that we exercise over them, these 
developers may not be able to complete titles for us on a timely basis or within acceptable quality standards, if at all. We
have  entered  into  agreements  with  third-parties  to  acquire  the  rights  to  publish  and  distribute  interactive  entertainment
software  as  well  as  to  use  licensed  intellectual  properties  in  our  titles.  These  agreements  typically  require  us  to  make 
development payments, pay royalties and satisfy other conditions. Our development payments may not be sufficient to permit 
developers to develop new software successfully, which could result in material delays and significantly increase our costs to 
bring particular products to market. Software development costs, promotion and marketing expenses and royalties payable to 
software developers and third-party licensors have increased significantly in recent years and reduce potential profits derived
from sales of our software. Future sales of our titles may not be sufficient to recover development payments and advances to
software  developers  and  licensors,  and  we  may  not  have  adequate  financial  and  other  resources  to  satisfy  our  contractual 
commitments  to  such  developers.  If  we  fail  to  satisfy  our  obligations  under  agreements  with  third-party  developers  and 
licensors,  the  agreements  may  be  terminated  or  modified  in  ways  that  are  burdensome  to  us,  and  have  a  material  adverse
effect on our financial condition and operating results.

f
We cannot publish our titles without the approval of hardware licensors that are also our competitors.

We  are  required  to  obtain  licenses  from  Sony,  Microsoft  and  Nintendo,  which  are  also  our  competitors,  to  develop  and 
publish titles for their respective hardware platforms. Our existing platform licenses require that we obtain approval for the 
publication of new titles on a title-by-title basis. As a result, the number of titles we are able to publish for these hardware
platforms, our ability to manage the timing of the release of these titles and, accordingly, our net revenue from titles for these 
hardware  platforms,  may  be  limited.  If  a  licensor  chooses  not  to  renew  or  extend  our  license  agreement  at  the  end  of  its 
current term, or if a licensor were to terminate our license for any reason or does not approve one or more of our titles, we 
may be unable to publish that title as well as additional titles for that licensor’s platform. Termination of any such agreements
or disapproval of titles could seriously hurt our business and prospects. We may be unable to continue to enter into license
agreements for certain current generation platforms on satisfactory terms or at all. Failure to enter into any such agreement 
could also seriously hurt our business. 

12 

Our platform licensors control the fee structures for online distribution of our games on their platforms.

Certain platform licensors have retained the right to change the fee structures for online distribution of both paid content and
free content (including patches and corrections) on their platforms. Each licensor’s ability to set royalty rates may increase
costs, which could negatively affect our operating margins. We may be unable to distribute our content in a cost-effective or 
profitable manner through this distribution channel, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We  may  not  be  able  to  adequately  adjust  our  cost  structure  in  a  timely  fashion  in  response  to  a  sudden  decrease  in
demand. 

In the event of a significant decline in revenue, we may not be able to dispose of facilities, reduce personnel or make other 
changes  to  our  cost  structure  without  disruption  to  our  operations  or  without  significant  termination  and  exit  costs.
Management  may  not  be  able  to  implement  such  actions  in a  timely  manner,  if  at  all,  to  offset  an  immediate  shortfall  in
revenue and profit. Moreover, reducing costs may impair our ability to produce and develop software titles at sufficient levels
in the future.

We submit our products for rating by the Entertainment Software Rating Board (“ESRB”) in the United States and other 
voluntary or government  ratings organizations  in  foreign  countries.  Failure  to  obtain  a  target  rating for  certain  of our 
products  could  negatively  affect our  ability  to distribute  and  sell  those  games, as  could  the  re-rating  of a game  for any 
reason. 

We voluntarily submit our game products to the ESRB, a U.S.-based non-profit and independent ratings organization. The
ESRB  system  provides  consumers  with  information  about  game  content  using  a  rating  symbol  that  generally  suggests  the 
appropriate  player  age  group  and  specific  content  descriptors,  such as  graphic  violence,  profanity  or  sexually  explicit 
material.  The  ESRB  may  impose  significant  penalties  on  game  publishers  for  violations  of  its  rules  related  to  rating  or 
marketing games, including revocation of a rating or monetary fines up to $1 million. Other countries require voluntary or 
government  backed  ratings  as  prerequisites  for  product  sales.  In  some  instances,  we  may  have  to  modify  our  products  in 
order to market them under the target rating, which could delay or disrupt the release of our products. In addition, some of 
our titles may not be sold at all or without extensive edits in certain countries, such as Germany. 

h

In the United States, if the ESRB rates a game as “AO” (age 18 and older), platform licensors may not certify the game and 
retailers  may  refuse  to  sell  it.  In  addition,  some  consumers  have  reacted  to  re-ratings  or  controversial  game  content  by 
refusing to purchase such games, demanding refunds for games that they had already purchased, and refraining from buying
other games published by us. Many of our Rockstar titles and certain of our 2K Games titles have been rated “M” (age 17 and 
older) by the ESRB. If we are unable to obtain “M” ratings and instead receive “AO” ratings on future versions of those or 
similar titles as a result of changes in the ESRB’s ratings standards or for other reasons, including the adoption of legislation
in this area, our business and prospects could be negatively affected. If any of our games are re-rated by the ESRB or other 
foreign based ratings organizations, we could be exposed to litigation, admini
strative fines and penalties and other potential
liabilities, and our operating results and financial condition could be significantly affected.

aa

We have implemented processes to comply with the requirements of the ESRB and other ratings organizations and properly
display  the  designated  rating  symbols  and  content  descriptions. Nonetheless,  these  processes  are  subject  to  human  error, 
circumvention,  overriding  and  reasonable  resource  constraints.  If  a  video  game  we  published  were  found  to  contain
undisclosed pertinent content, the ESRB could re-rate a game, retailers could refuse to sell it and demand that we accept the 
return of any unsold copies or returns from customers, and consumers could refuse to buy it or demand that we refund their 
money. This could have a material negative affect on our operating results and financial condition. In addition, we may be
exposed to litigation, administrative fines and penalties and our reputation could be harmed, which could affect sales of other
video  games  we  sell.  If  any  of  these  consequences  were  to  occur,  our  business  and  financial  performance  could  be 
significantly harmed. 

Content policies adopted by retailers, consumer opposition and litigation could negatively affect sales of our products. 

Retailers may decline to sell interactive entertainment software containing what they judge to be graphic violence or sexually
explicit  material  or  other  content  that  they  deem  inappropriate  for  their businesses.  If  retailers  decline  to  sell  our products
based  upon  their  opinion  that  they  contain  objectionable  themes,  graphic  violence or  sexually  explicit  material  or  other 
generally objectionable content, or if any of our previously “M” rated series products are rated “AO,” we might be required 
to significantly change or discontinue particular titles or series, which in the case of our best-selling Grand Theft Auto titles
could  seriously  affect  our  business.  Consumer  advocacy  groups  have  opposed  sales  of  interactive  entertainment  software 
containing  objectionable  themes,  violence  or  sexual  material  or  other  objectionable  content  by  pressing  for  legislation  in

13 

these  areas  and  by  engaging  in  public  demonstrations  and  media  campaigns.  Additionally,  although  lawsuits  seeking 
damages for injuries allegedly suffered by third-parties as a result of video games have generally been unsuccessful in the 
courts,  claims  of  this  kind  have  been  asserted  against  us  from  time  to  time  and  may  be  asserted  and  be  successful  in  the 
future.

tt
We  are  subject  to  risks  and  uncertainties  of international  trade,  including  fluctuat
ions  in  the  values  of  local  foreign 
currencies against the dollar. 

f

Sales in international markets, primarily in Europe, have accounted for a significant portion of our net revenue. Note 16 to
our  Consolidated  Financial  Statements,  “Segment  and  Geographic  Information,”  discloses  that  sales  in  Europe  comprised 
approximately 29.8% of the Company’s net revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012. We have also expanded our 
Asian  operations  in  an  effort  to  increase  our  geographical  scope  and  diversify  our  revenue  base.  We  are  subject  to  risks
inherent in foreign trade, including increased credit risks, tariffs and duties, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates,
shipping  delays,  and  international  political,  regulatory  and  economic  developments,  all  of  which  can  have  a  significant 
cal currencies, which could fluctuate against
influence on our operating results. Many of our international sales are made in lo
the dollar. While we may use forward exchange contracts to a limited extent to seek to mitigate foreign currency risk, our 
operating results could be adversely affected by unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations.

r

f

We face risks from our international operations.

We are subject to certain risks because of our international operations, particularly as we continue to grow our business and 
presence in Asia, Latin America and other parts of the world. Changes to and compliance with a variety of foreign laws and 
regulations may increase our cost of doing business and our inability or failure to obtain required approvals could harm our 
international  and  domestic  sales. Trade  legislation  in  either  the  United  States  or  other  countries,  such  as  a  change  in  the
current tariff structures, import/export compliance laws or other trade laws or policies, could adversely affect our ability to
sell  or  to  distribute  in  international  markets.  We  incur  additional  legal  compliance  costs  associated  with  our  international
operations  and  could  become  subject  to  legal  penalties  in  foreign  countries  if  we  do  not  comply  with  local  laws  and 
regulations which may be substantially different from those in the United States. In many foreign countries, particularly in
those  with  developing  economies,  it  may be  common  to  engage  in  business  practices  that  are  prohibited  by  United  States 
laws and regulations, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and by local laws, such as laws prohibiting corrupt payments 
to  government  officials.  Although  we  implement  policies  and  procedures  designed  to
ensure  compliance  with  these  laws,
there can be no assurance that all of our employees, contractors and agents, as well as those companies to which we outsource 
certain of our business operations, including those based in or from countries where practices which violate such laws may be
customary, will not take actions in violation of our policies. Any such violation, even if prohibited by our policies, could have
a material adverse effect on our business.

mm

If we are unable to protect the intellectual property relating to our software, the commercial value of our products will be
adversely affected and our competitive position could be harmed. 

We develop proprietary software and have obtained the rights to publish and distribute software developed by third-parties.
We attempt to protect our software and production techniques under copyright, trademark and trade secret laws as well as
through  contractual  restrictions  on  disclosure,  copying  and  distribution.  Our  software  is  susceptible  to  piracy  and
engineer our software to obtain and use
unauthorized copying. Unauthorized third-parties may be able to copy or to reverse
programming or production techniques that we regard as proprietary. Well organized piracy operations have also proliferated 
in recent years, resulting in the ability to download pirated copies of our software over the Internet. Although we attempt to
incorporate protective measures into our software, piracy of our products could negatively affect our future profitability. 

rr

If  we  infringe  on  or  are  alleged  to  infringe  on  the  intellectual  property  rights  of  third-parties,  our  business  could  be 
adversely affected.

-

As our industry grows, we may be subject to an increasing amount of litigation that is common in the software industry based 
on allegations of infringement or other alleged violations of patent, copyright and/or trademarks. In addition, we believe that
interactive  entertainment  software  will  increasingly  become  the  subject  of  claims  that  such  software  infringes  on  the 
intellectual property rights of others with both the growth of online functionality and advances in technology, game content 
and software graphics as games become more realistic. From time to time, we receive notices from third-parties or are named 
in  lawsuits  by  third-parties  alleging  infringement  of  their  proprietary  rights.  Although  we believe  that  our  software  and 
technologies  and  the  software  and  technologies  of  third-party  developers  and  publishers  with  whom  we  have  contractual
relations  do  not  and  will  not  infringe  or  violate  proprietary  rights  of  others,  it  is  possible  that  infringement  of  proprietary
rights of others may occur. Any claims of infringement, with or without merit, could be time consuming, costly and difficult 
to  defend.  Moreover,  intellectual  property  litigation  or  claims  could  require  us  to  discontinue  the  distribution  of  products,
obtain a license or redesign our products, which could result in additional substantial costs and material delays. 

r

14 

Our software is susceptible to errors, which can harm our financial results and reputation.

The technological advancements of new hardware platforms result in the development of more complex software products. 
As  software  products  become  more  complex,  the  risk  of  undetected  errors  in  new  products increases.  We  may  need  to 
produce  and  distribute  patches  in  order  to  repair  such  errors,  which  could  be  costly  and  may  distract  our  developers  from 
working on new products. If, despite testing, errors are found in new products or releases after shipments have been made, we 
could experience a loss of or delay in timely market acceptance, product returns, loss of revenue, increases in costs relating to
the repair of such errors and damage to our reputation.

If we acquire or invest in other businesses, intellectual properties or other assets, we may be unable to integrate them with
our  business,  our  financial  performance  may  be  impaired  and/or  we  may  not  realize  the  anticipated  financial  and 
strategic goals for such transactions. 

ee

If  appropriate  opportunities  present  themselves,  we  may  acquire or  make  investments  in  businesses,  intellectual  properties 
and other assets that we believe are strategic. We may not be able to identify, negotiate or finance any future acquisition or 
investment successfully. Even if we do succeed in acquiring or investing in a business, intellectual property or other asset,
such acquisitions and investments involve a number of risks, including:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

retaining  key  employees  and  maintaining  the  key  business  and  customer  relationships  of  the  businesses  we 
acquire;

cultural  challenges  associated  with  integrating  employees  from  an  acquired  company  or  business  into  our 
organization;

the possibility that the combined company would not achieve the expected benefits, including any anticipated 
operating and product synergies, of the acquisition as quickly as anticipated or that the costs of, or operational
difficulties arising from, an acquisition would be greater than anticipated;

significant acquisition-related accounting adjustments, particularly relating to an acquired company’s deferred 
f
revenue,  that  may  cause  reported  revenue  and  profits  of the  combined  company  to  be  lower  than  the  sum  of 
their stand-alone revenue and profits;

significant  accounting  charges  resulting  from  the  completion  and  integration  of  a  sizeable  acquisition  and 
increased  capital  expenditures,  including  potential  impairment  charges  incurred  to  write  down  the  carrying 
amount of intangible assets generated as a result of an acquisition; 

the possibility that we will not discover important facts during due diligence that could have a material adverse 
effect on the value of the businesses we acquire, including the possibility that a change of control of a company
we acquire triggers a termination of contractual or intellectual property rights important to the operation of its 
business; 

the need to integrate an acquired company’s accounting, management information, human resource and other 
administrative  systems  to  permit  effective  management  and  timely  reporting,  and  the  need  to  implement  or 
remediate controls, procedures and policies appropriate for a public company in an acquired company that, prior
to the acquisition, lacked these controls, procedures and policies;

litigation  or  other  claims  in  connection  with,  or  inheritance  of  claims  or  litigation  risks  as  a  result  of,  an 
acquisition, including claims from terminated employees, customers or other third-parties; and 

to  the  extent  that  we  engage  in  strategic  transactions  outside  of  the  United  States,  we  face  additional  risks, 
including risks related to integration of operations across different cultures and languages, currency risks and 
the particular economic, political and regulatory risks associated with specific countries. 

Future  acquisitions  and  investments  could  also  involve  the  issuance of  our  equity  and  equity-linked  securities  (potentially
diluting  our  existing  stockholders),  the  incurrence  of  debt,  contingent  liabilities  or  amortization  expenses,  write-offs  of 
goodwill, intangibles, or acquired in-process technology, or other increased cash and non-cash expenses such as stock- based 
compensation. Any of the foregoing factors could harm our financial condition or prevent us from achieving improvements in 
our financial condition and operating performance that could have otherwise been achieved by us on a stand-alone basis. Our 
stockholders may not have the opportunity to review, vote on or evaluate future acquisitions or investments.

d

a

15 

Our ability to acquire and maintain licenses to intellectual property, especially for sports titles, affects our revenue and 
profitability. Competition for these licenses may make them more expensive and increase our costs. 

Certain  of  our  products  are  based  on  or  incorporate  intellectual  property  owned  by others.  For  exampl
e,  our  2K Sports
products include rights licensed from major sports leagues and players’ associations. Similarly, some of our other titles are
based on licenses of popular entertainment products. Competition for these licenses is intense. If we are unable to maintain
these licenses or obtain additional licenses on reasonable economic terms or with significant commercial value, our revenue 
and profitability could decline significantly. Competition for these licenses may also increase the advances, guarantees and 
royalties that we must pay to the licensor, which could significantly increase our costs and adversely affect our profitability.
In addition, on certain intellectual property licenses, we are subject to guaranteed minimum payments, royalties or standards 
of performance and may not be able to terminate these agreements prior to their stated expiration. If such licensed products 
do not generate revenues in excess of such minimum guarantees, our profitability will be adversely affected.

m

y

We are subject to contractual covenants which place certain limitations on how we manage our business.

Our Credit Agreement (as defined herein) and the indentures governing our Convertible Notes (as defined herein) limit our 
ability  to  take  various  actions,  including  incurring  additional  debt,  paying  dividends, repurchasing  shares  and  acquiring  or 
disposing of assets or businesses. In addition, we have granted a security interest in connection with certain compensatory
arrangements which limits our ability to incur senior debt in excess of certain amounts. Accordingly, we may be restricted 
from taking actions that management believes would be desirable and in the best interests of us and our stockholders. Our 
Credit Agreement and the indentures also require us to satisfy specified financial and non-financial covenants. A breach of 
any of the covenants contained in our Credit Agreement could result in an event of default under the agreement and under the
indentures  governing  our  Convertible  Notes  and  would  allow  our  lenders  and  noteholders  to  pursue  various  remedies,
including accelerating the repayment of any outstanding indebtedness.

Our  involvement,  and  the  involvement  of  some  of  our  former  executive  officers,  in  a  wide  variety  of  lawsuits, 
investigations and proceedings has had, and may in the future have, a material adverse effect on us.

We  and  some  of  our  former  officers,  directors  and  employees  have  been  the  subject  of  three  separate  governmental
investigations  and  a  substantial  amount  of  litigation  and  other  proceedings  relating  to  the  subject  matter  of  those 
investigations. While these matters have been resolved we may be subject to heightened scrutiny in the futu
re as a result of 
our historical legal proceedings, including an increased likelihood of a government investigation occurring and an increased 
likelihood that any such investigation is more extensive than in the past. Furthermore, any future fines, restrictions or other
penalties imposed as a result of any such investigation may be more severe than those which may be imposed on a company 
without our history. 

d

Our business and products are subject to potential legislation. The adoption of such proposed legislation could limit the 
retail market for our products. 

Several proposals have been made for federal legislation to regulate our industry. Such proposals seek to prohibit the sale of 
products  containing  content  included  in  some  of  our  games. If  any  such  proposals  are  enacted  into  law,  it  may  limit  the 
potential market for some of our games in the United States, and adversely affect our operating results. Other countries, such
as Germany, have adopted laws regulating content both in packaged games and those transmitted over the Internet that are
stricter than current United States laws. In the United States, proposals have also been made by numerous state legislators to
regulate  and  prohibit  the  sale  of  interactive  entertainment  software  products  containing  certain types  of  violent  or  sexual
content to under 17 or 18 audiences, such as the State of California’s “ultraviolent video game
s law” that sought to ban the
ff
sale or rental of violent video games to minors. While such legislation to date has been enjoined by industry and retail groups
or been found unconstitutional, the adoption into law of such legislation in federal and/or in state jurisdictions in which we do 
significant business could severely limit the retail market for some of our games. 

We may need additional capital if we incur losses.

ii

If we incur losses in the future, we may be required to raise additional capital in order to fund our operations. We could seek
to  raise  capital  in  a  number  of  ways,  including  through the  issuance  of  debt  or  equity,  or  through  other  financing
arrangements.  In  October 2011,  we  entered  into  a  Second  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  Agreement  (the  “Credit 
Agreement”)  which  amended  and  restated our  July 2007 Credit  Agreement  (as  defined  herein), which  requires us  to  make 
periodic interest or other debt service payments. In addition, we issued 4.375% Convertible Notes due 2014 in June 2009 (the
“4.375%  Convertible  Notes”)  and  1.75%  Convertible  Notes  due 2016  in  November 2011  (the  “1.75%  Convertible  Notes”
and  together  with  the  4.375%  Convertible  Notes,  the  “Convertible  Notes”),  which  require  us  to  make  periodic  interest 

16 

payments  to  the  holders  of  the  Convertible  Notes.  If  we  borrow additional  funds,  further  debt  service  payments  would 
probably be necessary. In addition, the terms of additional debt may impose significant restrictions on our ability to operate 
our business. If we seek financing through the sale of equity or equity-based securities (such as our Convertible Notes), our 
current  stockholders  will  suffer  dilution  in their  percentage  ownership  of  common  st
ock.  We  cannot  be  certain  as  to  our 
n
ability to raise additional capital in the future or under what terms capital would be available. If we need to raise capital andaa
are not successful in doing so, we will have to consider other options that may include, but are not limited to, a reduction in
our  expenditures  for  internal  and  external  new  product  development,  reductions  in  overhead  expenses,  and  sales  of 
intellectual property and other assets. These actions, should they become necessary, will likely re
sult in a reduction in the size
y
of our operations and could materially affect the prospects of our business.

rr
We may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our goodwill becomes impaired. 

We are required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to review our goodwill for impairment at least annually 
or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that 
may be considered a change in circumstances, indicating a requirement to reevaluate whether our goodwill continues to be
recoverable, include a significant decline in stock price and market capitalization, slower growth rates in our industry or other
materially adverse events. We may be required to record a significant charge to earnings in our financial statements during 
the period in which any impairment of our goodwill is determined. This may adversely affect our operating results. 

t

Our reported financial results could be adversely affected by the application of existing or future accounting standards to 
our business as it evolves.

Our  reported  financial  results  are  affected  by  the  accounting  policies  promulgated  by  the  SEC  and  national  accounting 
standards bodies and the methods, estimates, and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies. For example, 
standards regarding software revenue recognition have and could further significantly affect the way we account for revenue 
related to our products and services. We expect that a significant portion of our games will be online- enabled in the future, 
and we could be required to recognize the related revenue over an extended period of time rather than at the time of sale. As 
we  enhance,  expand  and  diversify  our  business  and  product  offerings,  the  application  of  existing  or  future  financial 
accounting standards, particularly those relating to the way we account for revenue, could have a significant adverse effect on
our reported results although not necessarily on our cash flows. 

n

Risks relating to our common stock 

For purposes of this section “—Risks relating to our common stock,” references to “the Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” 
refer only to Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. and not to its subsidiaries. 

Additional issuances of equity securities by us would dilute the ownership of our existing stockholders.

We may issue equity or equity-based securities (such as our Convertible Notes) in the future in connection with acquisitions 
or  strategic  transactions,  to  adjust  our  ratio  of  debt  to  equity,  including  through  repayment  of  outstanding  debt,  to  fund
expansion  of  our  operations  or  for  other  purposes.  To  the  extent  we issue  additional  equity  securities,  the  percentage
ownership of our existing stockholders would be reduced. 

Future sales or other issuances of our common stock could adversely affect its market price. 

The sale of substantial amounts of our common stock could adversely affect its price. The sale or the availability for sale of a
large number of shares of our common stock in the public market could cause the price of our common stock to decline. The 
issuance of shares of our common stock upon conversion of our Convertible Notes could also adversely affect the price of 
our common stock.

Our stock price has been volatile and may continue to fluctuate significantly. 

The  market  price  of  our  common  stock  historically  has  been,  and  we  expect  will  continue  to  be,  subject  to  significant 
fluctuations.  These  fluctuations  may  be  due  to  factors  specific  to  us including  those  discussed  in  the  risk  factors  in  this 
section as well as others not currently known to us or that we currently do not believe are material, to changes in securities
analysts’ earnings estimates or ratings, to our results or future financial guidance falling below our expectations and analysts’
and investors’ expectations, to factors affecting the computer, software, entertainment, media or electronics industries, or to
national or international economic conditions. 

17 

Stock  markets,  in  general,  have  experienced  over  the  years,  and  continue  to  experience  significant  price  and  volume
fluctuations that have affected market prices for companies such as ours and that may be unrelated or disproportionate to the 
operating  performance  of  the  affected  companies.  These  broad  market  and  industry  fluctuations  may  adversely  affect  the
price of our stock, regardless of our operating performance.

f

The convertible senior note hedge and warrant transactions entered into in connection with the offering of our 4.375% 
Convertible Notes may affect the value of those notes and our common stock.

f

In connection with the offering of our 4.375% Convertible Notes, we entered into convertible senior note hedge transactions 
which  are  expected  to  reduce  the  potential  dilution  upon  conversion  of  the  notes.  However, we  also  entered  into  warrant 
transactions which could separately have a dilutive effect on our earnings per share to the extent that the market price per 
share of our common stock exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrants. In addition, the counterparties to the hedge
and warrant transactions, and/or their respective affiliates, may modify their hedge positions by entering into or unwinding
various derivatives with respect to our common stock and/or purchasing or selling our common stock in secondary market 
transactions at any time prior to the maturity of the 4.375% Convertible Notes (and are likely to do so during any observation
period  related  to  a  conversion  of  the  4.375%  Convertible  Notes).  This  activity  could  also  cause  or  avoid  an  increase  or  a 
decrease in the market price of our common stock or the 4.375% Convertible Notes. 

Delaware law, our charter documents and provisions of our debt agreements may impede or discourage a takeover, which 
could cause the market price of our shares to decline. 

f

We are a Delaware corporation, and the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law impose various impediments to the ability
of  a  third-party  to  acquire  control of us,  even  if  a  change  in control  would be  beneficial  to our  existing  stockholders.  Our 
Board has the power, without stockholder approval, to adopt a stockholder rights plan and/or to designate the terms of one or 
more series of preferred stock and issue shares of preferred stock. In addition, we may under certain circumstances involving
a change of control, be obligated to repurchase all or a portion of our Convertible Notes and any potential acquirer would be 
required to assume our obligations related to any outstanding Convertible Notes. We or any possible acquirer may not have 
available financial resources necessary to repurchase those notes. The ability of our Board to create and issue a new series of
preferred  stock  and  certain  provisions  of  Delaware  law,  our  certificate  of  incorporation  and  bylaws  and  the  indenture 
governing our notes could impede a merger, takeover or other business combination involving us or discourage a potential 
acquirer  from  making  a  tender  offer  for  our  common  stock,  which,  under  certain  circumstances,  could  reduce  the  market 
price of our common stock and the value of any outstanding notes. 

Our  ability  to  use  net  operating  loss  carryforwards  to  reduce  future  years’  taxes  could  be  substantially  limited  if  we 
experience an ownership change as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.

Section 382  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code contains  rules  that  limit  the  ability  of  a  company  to use  its  net  operating  loss
carryforwards in years after an ownership change, which is generally defined as any change in ownership of more than 50%
of  its  stock  over  a  three-year  testing  period.  These  rules  generally  operate  by  focusing  on  ownership  changes  among 
stockholders  owning  directly  or  indirectly  5%  or  more  of  the  stock  of  a  company  and/or  any  change  in  ownership  arising 
from a new issuance of stock by the company. If, as a result of future transactions involving our common stock, including 
purchases  or  sales  of  stock  by  5%  stockholders,  we  undergo  cumulative  ownership  changes  which  exceed  50%  over  the
testing  period,  our  ability  to  use  our  net  operating  loss  carryforwards  would  be  subject  to  additional  limitations  under 
Section 382. 

y

Generally, if an ownership change occurs, the annual taxable income limitation on the use of net operating loss carryforwards
is equal to the product of the applicable long-term tax exempt rate and the value of the company’s stock immediately before
the ownership change. Depending on the resulting limitation, a portion of our net operating loss carryforwards could expire
before we would be able to use them.

Our inability to fully utilize our net operating losses to offset taxable income generated in the future could have a material
and negative affect on our future financial position and results of operations. 

d

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments 

None.

18 

Item 2.  Properties

Our principal executive offices are located at 622 Broadway, New York, New York in approximately 64,000 square feet of 
space under a lease expiring in March 2023 for an annual rent of approximately $2.7 million. 

Take-Two  Interactive  Software  Europe Ltd,  our  wholly-owned  subsidiary,  leases  12,500  square  feet  of  office  space  in
Windsor,  United  Kingdom  for  an  annual  rent  of  approximately  $0.6 million  plus  taxes  and  utilities,  which  expires  in 
December 2021.  Rockstar  North,  our  wholly-owned  subsidiary,  leases  42,000  square  feet  of  office  space  in  Edinburgh, 
Scotland, for an annual rent of approximately $2.9 million.

 That lease expires in 2014.

t

2K corporate offices and two development studios occupy approximately 64,000 square
tt
California. The lease provides for an annual rent of approximately $1.9 million and expires in 2019.

feet of leased office space in Novato, 

In  addition,  our  other  subsidiaries  lease  office  space  in  Sydney  and  Canberra,  Australia;  Toronto  and  Vancouver,  Canada;
Chengdu,  Hanghzhou  and  Shanghai,  China;  Brno  and  Prague,  Czech  Republic;  Paris,  France;  Munich,  Germany;  Tokyo,
Japan; Seoul, Korea; Breda, Netherlands; Auckland, New Zealand; Newton, Singapore; Madrid, Spain; London, Lincoln, and 
Leeds, United Kingdom and,  in the United States, San Diego, and Northridge, California; Sparks, Maryland; Andover and
Quincy,  Massachusetts;  Glen  Cove,  New  York;  Cincinnati,  Ohio;  Kirkland,  Washington;  for  an  aggregate  annual  rent  of 
approximately $7.9 million.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings 

We are, or may become, subject to demands and claims (including intellectual property claims) and are involved in routine
litigation in the ordinary course of business which we do not believe to be material to our business or financial statements.
We  have  appropriately  accrued  amounts  related  to  certain  of  these  claims  and  legal  and  other  proceedings.  While  it  is 
reasonably possible that a loss may be incurred in excess of the amounts accrued in our financial statements, we believe that 
such losses, unless otherwise disclosed, would not be material. 

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable. 

PART II

Item 5.    Market  for  Registrant’s  Common  Equity,  Related  Stockholder  Matters  and  Issuer  Purchases  of  Equity 
Securities

Market Information

Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “TTWO.” The following table sets forth,
for the periods indicated, the range of the high and low sale prices for our common stock as reported by NASDAQ.

High

Low

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2012

First Quarter ended June 30, 2011 ...............................................................
Second Quarter ended September 30, 2011 ................................................. 
Third Quarter ended December 31, 2011 .................................................... 
Fourth Quarter ended March 31, 2012 ........................................................ 

$17.58  $14.26
10.63
15.77 
11.78
16.27 
13.78
16.99 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2011

First Quarter ended June 30, 2010 ............................................................... 
Second Quarter ended September 30, 2010 ................................................. 
Third Quarter ended December 31, 2010 .................................................... 
Fourth Quarter ended March 31, 2011 ........................................................ 

$11.84 
10.83 
13.62 
16.75 

$8.98
7.98
9.77
12.04

The number of record holders of our common stock was 78 as of May 21, 2012.

19 

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid cash dividends. We currently anticipate that all future earnings will be retained to finance the
growth of our business and we do not expect to declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of 
dividends  in  the  future  is  within  the  discretion  of  our  Board  of  Directors  and  will  depend  upon  future  earnings,  capital 
requirements and other relevant factors. Our Credit Agreement restricts the payment of dividends on our stock. 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The  table  setting forth  this  information  is  included  in  Part III—Item 12,  Security  Ownership of  Certain  Beneficial  Owners
and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Stock Performance Graph

The following line graph compares, from October 31, 2006 through March 31, 2012, the cumulative total stockholder return 
on  our  common  stock  with  the  cumulative  total  return  on  the  stocks  comprising  the  NASDAQ  Composite  Index  and  the 
stocks comprising a peer group index consisting of Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and THQ. The comparison assumes 
$100 was invested on October 31, 2006 in our common stock and in each of the following indices and assumes reinvestment 
of all cash dividends, if any, paid on such securities. We have not paid any cash dividends and, therefore, our cumulative total
return calculation is based solely upon stock price appreciation and not upon reinvestment of cash dividends. Historical stock 
price is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. 

f

t

Comparison of 65 Month Cumulative Total Return* 
Among Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., The NASDAQ Composite Index and a Peer Group 
March 2012

160.00

140.00

120.00

100.00

80.00

60.00

40.00

20.00

0.00

10/31/2006

10/31/2007

10/31/2008

10/31/2009

3/31/2010

3/31/2011

3/31/2012

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

NASDAQ Composite-Total Returns

Peer Group

* 

$100 invested on October 31, 2006 in stock or index- including reinvestment of dividends.

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. 
NASDAQ Composite-Total Returns 
Peer Group 

October 31,
2006
$100.00
100.00
100.00

October 31,
2007
$134.23
121.74
120.64

October 31,
2008
$84.78
73.89
64.26

October 31,
2009
$78.42
88.74
53.52

March 31,
2010
$70.56 
103.80 
58.86 

March 31,
2011
$109.88
121.65
56.09

March 31,
2012
$110.02
136.69
59.24

20 

SS
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 

In  March 2012,  we  issued  128,439  shares  of  our  common  stock  as  additional  consideration  in  connection  with  our 
December 2007 acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Illusion Softworks, a.s., the developer of the Mafia video game
franchise, to one of the sellers of the business. The issuance of these shares was exempt from
m
 registration under Section 4(2) 
f
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. 

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

The  following  tables  present  selected  financial  data  for  the  two  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2012,  five  months  ended 
March 31, 2010 and the three fiscal years ended October 31, 2009 (in thousands, except per share data). 

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Net revenue
Cost of goods sold 
Gross profit 

Selling and marketing 
General and administrative
Research and development 
Business reorganization and related 
Depreciation and amortization 

Total operating expenses 
Income (loss) from operations 
Interest and other, net 
Income (loss) from continuing operations 

before income taxes
Provision for income taxes 
Income (loss) from continuing operations 
Income (loss) from discontinued 

operations, net of taxes

Net income (loss) 
Earnings (loss) per share: 
Continuing operations 
  Discontinued operations 
Basic earnings (loss) per share 

Continuing operations 
  Discontinued operations 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share

Weighted average shares outstanding: 

Basic
Diluted

BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents
Working capital 
Total assets
Long-term debt 
Total liabilities
Stockholders’ equity 

Fiscal Year Ended
March 31,

2012

2011

Five Months 
Ended
March 31, 2010

Fiscal Year Ended October 31,
2008

2009

$825,823 $1,136,876
689,381
528,855
447,495
296,968
176,294
183,749
109,484
121,200
69,576
64,162
—
—
14,999
12,123
370,353
381,234
77,142
(84,266)
(13,519)
(19,571)

$359,231
222,396
136,835
72,402
43,466
25,279
—
6,622
147,769
(10,934)
(11,352)

$701,057  $1,231,106
709,719
521,387
154,396
166,228
63,929
4,478
21,322
410,353
111,034
(3,279)

467,576 
233,481 
141,962 
130,376 
63,748 
— 
17,574 
353,660 
(120,179) 
(5,771)

2007
$695,828
475,737
220,091
115,203
145,657
48,455
17,467
21,206
347,988
(127,897)
(629)

(103,837)
3,863
(107,700)

63,623
9,819
53,804

(22,286)
4,266
(26,552)

(125,950) 
4,487 
(130,437) 

107,755
13,271
94,484

(128,526)
9,943
(138,469)

(1,116)
$(108,816)

(5,346)
$48,458

(2,250)

(10,017) 
$(28,802) $(140,454) 

2,613

63
$97,097 $(138,406)

$(1.30)
(0.01)
$(1.31)
$(1.30)
(0.01)
$(1.31)

83,356
83,356

$0.62
(0.06)
$0.56
$0.62
(0.06)
$0.56

86,127
86,139

$(0.34)
(0.03)
$(0.37)
$(0.34)
(0.03)
$(0.37)

78,453
78,453

2012
$420,279
524,892
1,149,427
316,340
553,700
595,727

As of March 31,
2011
$280,359
335,715
971,659
107,239
356,380
615,279

2010
$145,838
216,733
839,276
99,865
318,653
520,623

$(1.70) 
(0.13)
$(1.83) 
$(1.70) 
(0.13)
$(1.83) 

$1.23
0.03
$1.26
$1.22
0.03
$1.25

76,815 
76,815 

77,254
77,666

As of October 31,

2009
$102,083 
274,274 
1,007,128 
97,063 
461,502 
545,626 

2008
$280,277
358,355
1,083,352
70,000
468,234
615,118

$(1.93)
—
$(1.93)
$(1.93)
—
$(1.93)

71,860
71,860

2007
$77,757
186,362
831,143
18,000
359,989
471,154

21 

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Overview

Our Business 

We  are  a  leading  developer,  marketer  and  publisher  of  interactive  entertainment  for  consumers  around  the  globe.  The
Company develops and publishes products through its two wholly-owned labels Rockstar Games and 2K, which publishes its 
titles  under  the  2K Games,  2K Sports  and  2K Play brands. Our products  are designed  for  console gaming  systems  such  as
Sony’s  PlayStation®3  (“PS3”)  and  PlayStation®2  (“PS2”),  Microsoft’s  Xbox 360®  (“Xbox 360”)  and  Nintendo’s  Wii™
(“Wii”); handheld gaming systems such as Nintendo’s DS (“DS”), Nintendo’s 3DS (“3DS”) and Sony’s PlayStation Portable
(“PSP”); and personal computers including smartphones and tablets. We deliver our products through physical retail, digital 
download, online platforms and cloud streaming services.

We endeavor to be the most creative, innovative and efficient company in our industry. Our core strategy is to capitalize on
the popularity of video games by developing and publishing high-quality interactive entertainment experiences across a range
of genres. We focus on building compelling entertainment franchises by publishing a select number of titles for which we can 
create sequels and add-on content. Most of our intellectual property is internally owned and developed, which we believe best 
positions  us  financially  and  competitively.  We have  established  a  portfolio  of  proprietary  software  content  for  the  major 
hardware platforms in a wide range of genres, including action, adventure, racing, role-playing, sports and strategy, which we
distribute worldwide. We believe that our commitment to creativity and innovation is a distinguishing strength, enabling us to 
differentiate our products in the marketplace by combining advanced technology with compelling storylines and characters
that  provide  unique  gameplay  experiences  for  consumers.  We  have  created,  acquired  or  licensed  a  group  of  highly 
aa
recognizable  brands  to  match  the  broad  consumer  demographics  we  serve,  ranging  from  adults  to  children  and  game
enthusiasts to casual gamers. Another cornerstone of our strategy is to support the success of our products in the marketplace
through innovative marketing programs and global distribution on all platforms and through all channels that are relevant to
our target audience. 

t

Our  revenue  is  primarily  derived  from  the  sale  of  internally developed  software  titles  and  software  titles  developed  by
third-parties  for  our  benefit.  Operating  margins  are  dependent  in  part  upon  our  ability  to continually  release  new,
commercially successful software products and to effectively manage their development costs. We have internal development 
studios located in Australia, Canada, China, Czech Republic, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Software titles published by our Rockstar Games label are primarily internally developed. We expect Rockstar Games, our 
wholly-owned  publisher  of  the Grand  Theft  Auto, Max  Payne, Midnight  Club, Red  Dead and  other  popular  franchises,  to
continue to be a leader in the action / adventure product category and create groundbreaking entertainment by leveraging our 
existing  titles  as  well  as  developing  new  brands.  We  believe  that  Rockstar  has  established  a  uniquely  original,  popular 
cultural  phenomenon  with  its Grand  Theft  Auto  series,  which  is  the  interactive  entertainment  industry’s  most  iconic  and 
critically acclaimed brand and has sold-in approximately 120 million units. Rockstar continues to expand on our established 
franchises by releasing sequels, as well as offering downloadable episodes and content. In May 2011, Rockstar released the
commercially successful and critically acclaimed L.A. Noire, which became the first video game ever chosen as an official 
selection  of  the  Tribeca  Film  Festival.  Rockstar  has  released  several  downloadable  content  packs  to  support  that  title. 
Rockstar is also well known for developing brands in other genres, including the Bully and Manhunt franchises.

d

r

t

2K Games has published a variety of popular entertainment properties across multiple genres and platforms and we expect 
2K Games to continue to develop new and successful franchises in the future. 2K Games’ internally owned and developed 
franchises  include  the  critically  acclaimed,  multi-million  unit  selling BioShock, Mafia,  and  Sid  Meier’s  Civilization  series. 
2K Games has also published titles that were externally developed, such as Borderlands, which has become a key franchise
n
for 2K Games since its launch in October 2009 and has been supported by several successful downloadable content packs.

2K Sports publishes realistic sports simulation titles, including our flagship NBA 2K series, which has been the top-ranked 
NBA basketball video game for 11 years running, the Major League Baseball 2K series, and our 
Top Spin tennis series. We
develop  most  of  our  2K Sports  software  titles  through  our  internal  development  studios.  2K Sports  has  secured  long-term 
licensing agreements with the National Basketball Association (“NBA”). Our current licenses with Major League Baseball 
Properties,  the  Major  League  Baseball  Players  Association and  Major  League  Baseball  Advanced  Media  expire  in 
fiscal 2013.

K

K

22 

2K Play  focuses  on  developing  and  publishing  titles  for  the  casual  and  family-friendly  games  market.  2K Play  titles  are 
developed  by  both  internal  development  studios  and  third-party  developers.  Internally  developed  titles  include Carnival 
Games and Let’s Cheer!. 2K Play also has a partnership with Nickelodeon to publish video games based on its top rated Nick 
Jr. titles such as Dora the Explorer; Go, Diego, Go!; Ni Hao, Kai-lan and The Backyardigans. We expect family- oriented 
gaming to continue to be a component of our business in the future.

We also have expansion initiatives in the rapidly growing Asia markets, where our strategy is to broaden the distribution of 
our existing products, expand our business in Japan, and establish an online gaming presence, especially in China and Korea.
2K Sports has secured a multi-year license from the NBA to develop an online version of the NBA simulation game in China,
Taiwan, South Korea and Southeast Asia.

Discontinued operations 

In  February 2010,  we  completed  the  sale  to  SYNNEX  Corporation  (“Synnex”)  of  our  Jack  of  All  Games  third-party
distribution business, which primarily distributed third-party interactive entertainment software, hardware and accessories in 
North America for approximately $44.0 million, including $37.3 million in cash, subject to purchase price adjustments, and 
up to an additional $6.7 million, subject to the achievement of certain items, which were not met. In April 2011, we settled on
the  purchase  price  adjustments  and  as  a  result  the  purchase price  was  lowered  by  $1.5 million.  Consequently,  the  net 
purchase price after the settlement was $35.8 million. The financial results of this business, which were previously reported 
as our distribution business, have been classified as discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for 
all  periods  presented.  The  assets  and  liabilities  of  this  business  are  reflected  as  assets  and  liabilities  of  discontinued 
operations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information regarding discontinued operations. 

Trends and Factors Affecting our Business

Product  Release  Schedule.    Our  financial  results  are  affected  by  the  timing  of  our  product  releases  and  the  commercial
success of those titles. Our Grand Theft Auto products in particular have historically accounted for a substantial portion of 
our revenue. Sales of Grand Theft Auto products generated approximately 13.8% of the Company’s net revenue for the fiscal 
year ended March 31, 2012. The timing of our Grand Theft Auto releases varies significantly, which in turn may affect our 
financial performance on a quarterly and annual basis. 

u

Economic Environment and Retailer Performance.  We continue to monitor economic conditions that may unfavorably affect 
our businesses, such as deteriorating consumer demand, pricing pressure on our products, credit quality of our receivables, 
and  foreign  currency  exchange  rates.  Our  business  is  dependent  upon  a  limited  number  of  customers  who  account  for  a 
significant portion of our revenue. Our five largest custom
ers accounted for 43.9%, 43.8%, 59.8%, 55.7%, and 56.4% of net 
revenue  during  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2012,  2011  and 2010,  five  months  ended  March 31,  2010  and  fiscal  year
ended October 31, 2009, respectively. As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, the five largest customers accounted for 61.3% and
54.2% of our gross accounts receivable, respectively. Customers that individually accounted for more than 10% of our gross
accounts  receivable  balance  comprised  40.6%  and  38.2%  of  such  balances  at  March 31,  2012  and 2011,  respectively.  The
economic environment has affected our customers in the past, and may do so in the future. Bankruptcies or consolidations of 
our large retail customers could seriously hurt our business, due to uncollectible accounts receivables and the concentration 
of purchasing power among the remaining large retailers. Certain of our large customers sell used copies of our games, which
may negatively affect our business by reducing demand for new copies of our games. While the downloadable episodes that 
we now offer for certain of our titles may serve to reduce used game sales, we expect used game sales to continue to affect 
our business. 

Hardware Platforms.  The majority of our products are made for the hardware platforms developed by three companies—
Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo. Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Segment and Geographic Information,”
discloses  that  Sony,  Microsoft  and  Nintendo  hardware  platforms  comprised  approximately  89.4%  of  the  Company’s  net 
revenue by product platform for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012. The success of our business is dependent upon the 
consumer  acceptance  of  these  platforms  and  the  continued  growth  in  the  installed  base  of  these  platforms.  When  new 
hardware platforms are introduced, demand for software based on older platforms d
eclines, which may negatively affect our 
d
business.  Additionally,  our development  costs  are generally higher for  titles  based  on new  platforms,  and  we  have limited 
ability to predict the consumer acceptance of the new platforms, which may affect our sales and profitability. As a result, we
believe it is important to focus our development efforts on a select number of titles, which is consistent with our strategy. 

23 

Online Content and Digital Distribution.  The interactive entertainment software industry is delivering a growing amount of 
content through digital online delivery methods. We provide a variety of online delivered products and services. A number of 
our titles that are available through retailers as packaged goods products are also available through direct digital download 
through the Internet (from websites we own and others owned by third-parties). We also offer downloadable add-on content 
to  our  packaged  goods  titles.  In  addition,  in  July 2011,  we  launched  our  first  social  gaming  experience,  Sid  Meier’s 
Civilization  World,  for  Facebook,  and  we  have  several  initiatives  underway  to  develop  online  games  primarily  for  Asian
markets. We expect online delivery of games and game services to become an increasing part of our business over the long-
term. 

y

Product Releases

We released the following key titles in fiscal year 2012:

Title
L.A. Noire
Duke Nukem Forever 
r
NBA® 2K12 
The Darkness II
I
Major League Baseball 2K12

Publishing Label
Rockstar Games 
2K Games 
2K Sports 
2K Games 
2K Sports 

Internal or External
Development
External 
External 
Internal 
External 
Internal 

Platform(s)

PS3, Xbox 360 
PS3, Xbox 360, PC 
PS3, PS2, PSP, Xbox 360, Wii, PC 
PS3, Xbox 360, PC 
PS3, PS2, PSP, Xbox 360, Wii, DS, PC 

Date Released
May 17, 2011 
June 10, 2011
October 4, 2011
February 7, 2012
March 6, 2012 

Product Pipeline

We  have  announced  expected  release  dates  for  the  following  key  titles  (this  list  does  not  represent  all  titles  currently  in 
development):

Title
Max Payne 3
Max Payne 3
Spec Ops: The Line 
Borderlands™ 2 
NBA® 2K13 
XCOM: Enemy Unknown 
BioShock®kk Infinite 
XCOM®MM  
V
Grand Theft Auto V

Publishing Label

Rockstar Games 
Rockstar Games 
2K Games 
2K Games 
2K Sports 
2K Games 
2K Games 
2K Games 
Rockstar Games 

Internal or External
Development
Internal 
Internal 
External 
External 
Internal 
Internal 
Internal 
Internal 
Internal 

Platform(s)

PS3, Xbox 360 
PC 
PS3, Xbox 360, PC 
PS3, Xbox 360, PC 
PS3, PSP, Xbox 360, Wii, PC 
PS3, Xbox 360, PC 
PS3, Xbox 360, PC 
PS3, Xbox 360, PC 
To be announced 

Actual / Expected 
Release Date
May 15, 2012 (released)
June 1, 2012 
June 26, 2012
September 18, 2012
October 2, 2012 
October 9 2012
February 26, 2013
Fiscal year 2014
To be announced 

Fiscal 2012 Financial Summary 

Our fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 net revenue was led by titles from a variety of our top franchises, including
d
NBA  2K12, Grand  Theft  Auto  products,  Duke  Nukem  Forever  and 
$825.8 million, a decrease of $311.1 million or 27.4% from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011. 

L.A. Noire,
Red  Dead  Redemption.  Our  net  revenue  decreased  to

r

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, our net loss was $108.8 million, as compared to net income of $48.5 million in the 
prior year. Net loss per share for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 was $1.31, as compared to earnings per share for the 
fiscal  year  ended  March 31, 2011  of  $0.56.  Our  net  loss  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31, 2012  as  compared  to  our  net 
income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 was primarily as a result of (1) a decrease of $311.1 million in net revenue, 
(2) a decrease of 3 points in our gross profit as a percent of net revenue, (3) an increase of 14 points in our operating expenses
as  a  percent  of  net  revenue,  (4) an  increase  of  $6.1 million  in  interest  and  other,  net,  expense  and  (5) a  decrease  of 
ff
$4.2 million in our loss from discontinued operations, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012.

d

tt

 million at March 31, 2011. Our 
qq
At March 31, 2012 we had $420.3 million of cash and cash equivalents, compared to $280.4
increase in cash and cash equivalents from March 31, 2011 was primarily a result of cash provided by financing activities
partially offset by cash used in operating activities, cash used in investing activities and the effect of exchange rates. 

Cash  provided  by  financing  activities  was  generated  from  the  net  proceeds  from  the  issuance  of  $250.0 million  of  1.75%
Convertible Notes in November 2011. Cash used in operating activities was primarily due to our net loss of $108.8 million.
Cash  used  in  investing  activities  was  primarily  due  to  purchases  of  fixed  assets  of  $10.8 million  and  we  paid  contingent 
consideration  of  $4.1 million for  our  prior  year  acquisitions.  Cash  and  cash  equivalents  were  negatively  affected  by 
$4.3 million as a result of foreign currency exchange rate movements. 

24 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  U.S.  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  (“U.S. GAAP”) 
requires  management  to  make  estimates  and  assumptions  about  future events  and  apply  judgments  that  affect  the  reported 
amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of net revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We base our estimates, assumptions and 
judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our 
Consolidated  Financial  Statements  are  prepared.  On  a  regular  basis,  management  reviews  the  accounting  policies, 
assumptions,  estimates  and  judgments  to  ensure  that  our  financial  statements  are  fairly  presented  in  accordance  with
U.S. GAAP.  However,  because  future  events  and  their  effects  cannot  be  determined  with  certainty,  actual  amounts  could 
differ significantly from these estimates.

t

We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our financial results and
they require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about 
the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The affect and any associated risks related to these policies on our business
operations is discussed throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these
and  other  accounting  policies,  see  Note 1  to  the  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  included  in  Item 8.  Management  has 
d
reviewed these critical accounting estimates and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. 

Revenue Recognition

We  recognize  revenue  upon  the  transfer  of title  and  risk  of  loss  to  our  customers.
  Accordingly,  we  recognize  revenue  for 
software titles when there is (1) persuasive evidence that an arrangement with the customer exists, which is generally based 
on a customer purchase order, (2) the product is delivered, (3) the selling price is fixed or determinable and (4) collection of
the customer receivable is deemed probable. Certain products are sold to customers with a street date (i.e., the earliest date
these products may be sold by retailers). For these products we recognize revenue on the later of the street date or the sale 
date. 

f

Our payment arrangements with customers typically provide net 30 and 60 day terms. Advances received for licensing and 
exclusivity  arrangements  are  reported  on  our  Consolidated  Balance  Sheets  as
deferred  revenue  until  we  meet  our 
performance obligations, at which point we recognize the revenue. 

d

Some  of  our  software  products  provide  limited  online  functionality  at  no  additional  cost  to  the  consumer.  Generally,  we 
consider such features to be incidental to the overall product offering and an inconsequential deliverable. Accordingly, we do
not defer revenue related to products containing such online features. We determine whether our products contain substantial
online functionality by evaluating the significance of the development effort and the nature of the online features, the extent
of  anticipated  marketing  focus  on  the  online  features,  the  significance  of  the  online  features  to  the  customers’  anticipated
overall gameplay experience, and the significance of our post sale obligations to cu
stomers. Overall, online play functionality
is still an emerging area for us, and we continue to monitor this developing functionality and its significance to our products.

ff

In addition, some of our software products are sold exclusively as downloads of digital content for which the consumer takes 
possession of the digital content for a fee. Revenue from product downloads is generally recognized when the download is
made available (assuming all other recognition criteria are met). 

Certain of our software products include in-game advertising for third- party products. Advance payments received for in-
game advertising are reported on the balance sheet as deferred revenue until we meet our performance obligations, at which
y
point we recognize the revenue, which is generally at the time of the initial release of the product. 

Revenue  is  recognized  after  deducting  estimated  reserves  for  returns,  price  concessions  and  other  allowances.  In
circumstances when we do not have a reliable basis to estimate returns and price concessions or are unable to determine that 
collection of a receivable is probable, we defer the revenue until such time as we can reliably estimate any related returns and
allowances and determine that collection of the receivable is probable.

25 

Allowances for Returns, Price Concessions and Other Allowances

We accept returns and grant price concessions in connection with our publishing arrangements. Following reductions in the
price  of  our  products,  we  grant  price  concessions  to  permit  customers  to  take  credits  against  amounts  they  owe  us  with
respect to merchandise unsold by them. Our customers must satisfy certain conditions to entitle them to return products or 
receive price concessions, including compliance with applicable payment terms and confirmation of field inventory levels.

Our distribution arrangements with customers generally do not give them the right to return titles or to cancel firm orders.
However, we occasionally accept returns from our customers for stock balancing and make accommodations to customers,
which include credits and returns, when demand for specific titles falls below expectations. 

ff

We make estimates of future product returns and price concessions related to current period product revenue. We estimate the
amount of future returns and price concessions for published titles based upon, among other factors, historical experience and 
performance  of  the  titles  in  similar  genres,  historical  performance  of  the  hardware  platform,  customer  inventory  levels, 
analysis of sell-through rates, sales force and retail customer feedback, industry pricing, market conditions and changes in
demand and acceptance of our products by consumers.

Significant management judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with establishing the allowance for 
returns  and  price  concessions  in  any  accounting  period.  We  believe  we  can  make  reliable  estimates  of  returns  and  price
concessions.  However,  actual  results  may  differ  from  initial  estimates  as  a  result  of  changes  in  circumstances,  market 
conditions and assumptions. Adjustments to estimates are recorded in 

the period in which they become known. 

h

d

Software Development Costs and Licenses

Capitalized  software  development  costs  include  direct  costs  incurred  for  internally  developed  titles  and  payments  made  to
third-party software developers under development agreements. 

We capitalize internal software development costs (including stock-based compensation, specifically identifiable employee 
payroll expense and incentive compensation costs related to the completion and release of titles), third-party production and 
other  content  costs,  subsequent  to  establishing  technological  feasibility of  a  software  title.  Technological  feasibility  of  a 
product  includes  the  completion  of  both  technical  design  documentation  and  game  design  documentation.  Significant 
management judgment and estimates are utilized in establishing technological feasibility.

d

We enter into agreements with third-party developers that require us to make payments for game development and production 
services.  In  exchange for  these  payments,  we  receive  the  exclusive  publishing  and  distribution  rights  to  the  finished  game 
title as well as, in some cases, the underlying intellectual property rights. Such agreements allow us to fully recover these
payments to the developers at an agreed upon royalty rate earned on the subsequent retail sales of such software, net of any 
agreed  upon  costs.  Prior  to  establishing  technological  feasibility  of  a  product  we  record  any  costs  incurred  by  third-  party 
developers  as  research  and  development  expenses.  Subsequent  to  establishing  technological  feasibility  of  a  product  we
capitalize  all  development  and  production service  payments  to  third-party  developers  as  software  development  costs  and 
licenses. We typically enter into agreements with third-party developers after completing the technical design documentation 
for  our  products  and  therefore  record  the  design  costs  leading  up  to  a  signed development  contract  as  research  and 
development  expense.  When  we  contract  with  third-party  developers,  we  generally  select  third-party  developers  that  have 
proven technology and experience in the genre of the software being developed, which often allows for the establishment of 
technological feasibility early in the development cycle. In instances where the documentation of the design and technology 
are  not  in  place  prior  to  an  executed  contract,  we  monitor  the  software  development  process  and  require  our  third-party 
developers to adhere to the same technological feasibility standards that apply to our internally developed products. 

d

Licenses  consist  of  payments  and  guarantees  made  to  holders of  intellectual  property  rights  for  use  of  their  trademarks,
copyrights or other intellectual property rights in the development of our products. Agreements with license holders generally
provide for guaranteed minimum royalty payments for use of their intellectual property. Guaranteed minimum payments are
initially recorded as an asset (licenses) and as a liability (accrued licenses) upon execution of a licensing agreement, provided
that  no  significant  performance  remains  to  be  completed  by  the  licensor.  When  significant  performance  remains  to  be
completed by the licensor, we record payments when actually paid.

Certain licenses, especially those related to our sports products, extend over multi-year periods and encompass multiple game
titles. In addition to guaranteed minimum payments, these licenses frequently contain provisions that could require us to pay
royalties to the license holder based on pre-agreed unit sales thresholds. 

n

r

26 

Amortization of capitalized software development costs and licenses commences when a product is released and is recorded 
on  a  title-by-title  basis  in  cost  of  goods sold.  For  capitalized software  development  costs,  amortization  is  calculated  using 
(1) the proportion of current year revenues to the total revenues expected to be recorded over the life of the title or (2) the
straight-line  method  over  the  remaining  estimated  useful  life  of  the  title,  whichever  is  greater.  For  capitalized  licenses,
amortization  is  calculated  as  a  ratio  of  (1) current  period  revenues  to  the  total  revenues  expected  to  be  recorded  over  the 
remaining  life  of  the  title  or  (2) the  contractual  royalty  rate  based  on  actual  net  product  sales  as  defined  in  the  licensing
agreement, whichever is greater.

r

Significant management judgments and estimates are utilized in the assessment of the recoverability of capitalized software
costs. At each balance sheet date, or earlier if an indicator of impairment exists, we evaluate the recoverability of capitalized 
software costs, licenses and any other unrecognized minimum commitments that have not been paid, using an undiscounted 
future cash flow analysis. We use various measures to evaluate expected product performance and estimate future revenues
for  our  software  titles  including  historical performance  of  comparable  titles;  orders  for  titles  prior  to  release;  and  the
estimated performance of a sequel title based on the performance of the title on which the sequel is based. When management 
determines that the value of a title is unlikely to be recovered by product sales, capitalized costs are charged to cost of goods
sold in the period in which such determination is made. 

f

We  have  established  profit  and  unit  sales  based  internal  royalty  programs  that  provide  for  certain  of  our  employees  to
participate in the success of software titles that they assist in developing. Royalties earned by employees under this program
are recorded as cost of goods sold as they are incurred.

Fair Value Estimates 

The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  U.S. GAAP  often requires  us  to  determine  the  fair  value  of  a 
particular  item  to  fairly  present  our  Consolidated  Financial  Statements.  Without  an  independent  market  or  another 
representative  transaction,  determining  the  fair  value  of  a  particular  item  requires us  to  make  several  assumptions  that  are
inherently difficult to predict and can have a material influence on the conclusion of the appropriate accounting.

There  are  various  valuation  techniques  used  to  estimate  fair  value.  These  include  (1) the  market  approach  where  market 
transactions  for  identical  or  comparable  assets  or  liabilities  are  used  to  determine  the  fair  value,  (2) the  income  approach,
which  uses  valuation  techniques  to  convert  future  amounts  (for  example,  future  cash  flows  or  future  earnings)  to  a  single 
present amount, and (3) the cost approach, which is based on the amount that would be required to replace an asset. For many
of  our  fair  value  estimates,  including  our  estimates  of  the  fair  value  of  acquired  intangible  assets,  we  use  the  income 
approach.  Using  the  income  approach  requires  the  use  of  financial  models,  which  require  us  to  make  various  estimates
including, but not limited to (1) the potential future cash flows for the asset, liability or equity instrument being measured,
(2) the  timing  of  receipt  or  payment  of  those  future  cash  flows,  (3) the  time  value  of  money  associated  with  the  delayed 
receipt or payment of such cash flows, and (4) the inherent risk associated with the cash flows (risk premium). Making these 
cash flow estimates are inherently difficult and subjective, and, if any of the estimates used to determine the fair value using
the income approach turns out to be inaccurate, our financial results may be negatively affected. Furthermore, relatively small
changes in many of these estimates can have a significant influence on the estimated fair value resulting from the financial
models or the related accounting conclusion reached. For example, a relatively small change in the estimated fair value of an
asset  may  change  a  conclusion  as  to  whether  an  asset  is impaired.  While  we  are  required  to  make  certain  fair  value 
assessments associated with the accounting for several types of transactions, the following areas are the most sensitive to the
assessments: 

Inventory Obsolescence.  We regularly review inventory quantities on-hand and in the retail channels and record an inventory 
for  our  products.  Significant  changes  in
rr
provision  for  excess  or  obsolete  inventory  based  on  the  future  expected  demand 
demand  for  our  products  would  affect  management’s  estimates  in  establishing  our  inventory  provision.  We  write  down 
inventory  based  on  excess  or  obsolete  inventories  determined  primarily  by  future  anticipated  demand  for  our  products. 
Inventory  write-downs  are  measured as  the  difference  between the  cost  of  the  inventory  and  market  value,  based  upon
assumptions about future demand that are inherently difficult to assess.

t

Business Combinations—Goodwill and Intangible Assets.  We must estimate the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in a business combination. Our assessment of the estimated fair value of each of these can have a material effect on 
our reported results as intangible assets are amortized over various lives. Furthermore, a change in the estimated fair value of
an  asset  or  liability  often  has  a  direct  influence  on  the  amount  to  recognize  as  goodwill,  which  is  an  asset  that  is  not 
amortized. Often determining the fair value of these assets and liabilities assumed requires an assessment of expected use of 
the asset, the expected cost to extinguish the liability or our expectations related to the timing and the successful completion
of development of an acquired in-process technology. Such estimates are inherently difficult and subjective and can have a 
material influence on our financial statements. 

27 

We use either the income, cost or market approach to aid in our conclusions of such fair values and asset lives. The income 
approach presumes that the value of an asset can be estimated by the net economic benefit to be received over the life of the
asset,  discounted  to  present  value.  The  cost  approach  presumes  that  an  investor  would  pay  no  more  for  an  asset  than  its
replacement or reproduction cost. The market approach estimates value based on what other participants in the market have
paid  for  reasonably  similar  assets.  Although  each  valuation  approach  is  considered  in  valuing  the  assets  acquired,  the 
approach ultimately selected is based on the characteristics of the asset and the availability of information.

aa

We evaluate our goodwill annually for impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the fair value of 
a reporting unit is below its carrying amount. The determination of whether or not goodwill has become impaired involves a
significant level of judgment in the assumptions underlying the approach used to determine the value of our reporting units.
Changes  in  our  strategy  and/or  market  conditions  could  significantly  affect  these  judgments  and  require  reductions  to
recorded intangible asset balances. 

Long-lived assets.  We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the 
related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Determining whether impairment has occurred typically requires various
estimates and assumptions, including determining which cash flows are directly related to the potentially impaired asset, the 
useful life over which cash flows will occur, their amount and the asset’s residual value, if any. In turn, measurement of an 
impairment  loss  requires  a  determination  of  fair  value,  which  is  based  on  the  best  information  available.  We  use  internal
discounted cash flow estimates, quoted market prices when available and independent appraisals, as appropriate, to determine
fair  value.  We  derive  the  required  cash  flow  estimates  from  our  historical  experience  and  our  internal  business  plans  and 
apply an appropriate discount rate.

Stock-based Compensation 

Stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as
expense  over  the  vesting  period.  Determining  the  fair  value  of stock-based  awards  at  the  gr
ant  date  requires  judgment  in 
f
estimating expected stock volatility and the amount of stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. If actual results 
differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially 
affected.

We have granted stock options to non-employees, which were subject to variable accounting. When variable accounting is
applied to stock option grants, we re-measured the fair value of the unvested options at the end of each reporting period or 
until  the  options  are  cancelled  or  expire  unexercised.  Compensation  expense  in  any  given  period  was  calculated  as  the 
difference between total earned compensation at the end of the period, less total earned compensation at the beginning of the 
period, both of which was based on the price of our common stock at such dates. As a result, fluctuations in the price of our
common stock changed compensation expense recognized by us from period to period.

We  have  also  granted  time  and  market-based  restricted  stock  awards  to  employees  and  non-employees.  Time-based  and 
market-based awards to non-employees are subject to variable accounting. For the time-based restricted stock grants to non-
employees, we cumulatively remeasure the fair value at the end of every period based on the month end closing price of our 
common  stock.  Market-based  restricted  stock  awards  vest  based  on  the  relative  performance  of  our  common  stock  to  a 
composite index. We calculate the fair value of market-based restricted stock using a Monte Carlo Simulation method, which
requires a substantial number of inputs and estimates of future market conditions and considers the range of various vesting 
probabilities. As a result, expense recorded for our non-employee awards can fluc

tuate substantially from period to period. 

d

Income Taxes 

We record a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported results of operations. The provision for income 
taxes  is  computed  using  the  asset  and  liability  method,  under  which  deferred  income  taxes  are  recognized  for  differences
acted statutory tax rates for the years in
a
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities at currently en
which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in
the period that includes the enactment.

We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
Our cumulative pre-tax loss in recent fiscal years represents sufficient evidence for us to determine that the establishment of a 
valuation  allowance  against  the  deferred  tax  asset  is  appropriate.  This  valuation  allowance  offsets  deferred  tax  assets 
associated with future tax deductions as well as carryforward items.

f

28 

Our  future  effective  tax  rates  could  be  adversely  affected  by earnings  being  lower  than  anticipated  in  countries  where  we 
have  lower  statutory  rates,  changes  in  the  valuation  of  our  deferred  tax  assets  or  liabilities,  or  changes  in  tax  laws  or 
interpretations thereof. In addition, our filed tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and othe
r
u
tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the 
adequacy of our provision for income taxes.

We recognize and measure uncertain tax positions and record tax benefits when it is more likely than not that the tax position 
will  be  sustained  on  examination  by  the taxing  authorities,  based  on  the  technical  merits  of  the  position.  The  tax  benefits 
recognized in the financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater 
than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

At  each  period  end,  it  is necessary  for  us  to  make  certain  estimates  and  assumptions  to  compute  the  provision  for income
taxes  including  allocations  of  certain  transactions  to  different  tax  jurisdictions,  amounts  of  permanent  and  temporary 
differences, the likelihood of deferred tax assets being recovered and the outcome of contingent tax risks. These estimates
and assumptions are revised as new events occur, more experience is acquired and additional information is obtained. The
effect of these revisions is recorded in income tax expense or benefit in the period in which they become known. 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements

On  April 1,  2011,  the  Company  adopted  new  guidance related  to  the  accounting  for  multiple-deliverable  revenue
arrangements.  These  new  rules  amend  the  existing  guidance  for  separating  consideration  in  multiple-deliverable
arrangements and establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The adoption of this 
new guidance did not have any effect on our consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements

On  April 1,  2011,  the  Company  adopted  new  guidance  that  changes  the  accounting  model  for  revenue  arrangements  by
excluding  tangible  products  containing  both  software  and  non-software  components  that  function  together  to  deliver  the
product’s  essential  functionality.  The  adoption  of  this  new  guidance  did  not  have  any  effect  on  our  consolidated  financial
position, cash flows or results of operations. 

Testing Goodwill for Impairment 

On  September 30,  2011,  the  Company  adopted  new  guidance  related  to  testing  goodwill  for  impairment  effective  for  the 
Company’s  annual  impairment  test  as  of  August 1,  2011.  This  new  guidance  permits  an  entity  to  make  a  qualitative
assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying value as a basis for 
determining  whether  it  is  necessary  to  perform  the  two-step goodwill  impairment  test.  If  it  is  determined  through  the
qualitative assessment that a reporting unit’s fair value is more likely than not greater than its carrying value, the remainin
g
impairment  steps  would  be  unnecessary.  The  qualitative  assessment  is  optional,  allowing  entities  to  go  directly  to  the
quantitative assessment. This new guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal 
years beginning after December 15, 2011. However, early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill 
impairment  tests  performed  as  of  a  date  before  September 15, 2011,  if  an  entity’s  financial  statements  for  the  most  recent 
annual or interim period have not yet been issued. The early adoption of this new guidance did not have any effect on our 
consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

r

Comprehensive Income 

In June 2011, new guidance was issued related to the presentation of comprehensive income. The main provisions of the new
guidance provide that an entity that reports items of other comprehensive income has the option to present comprehensive 
income as (i) a single statement that presents the components of net income and total net income, the components of other 
comprehensive income and total other comprehensive income and a total for comprehensive income or (ii) in two separate
but consecutive statements, whereby an entity must present the components of net income and total net income in the first 
statement  and  that  statement  is  immediately  followed  by  a  financial  statement  that  presents  the  components  of  other 
comprehensive  income,  a  total  for  other  comprehensive  income  and  a  total  for  comprehensive  income.  The  new  rules 
eliminate  the  option  to  present  the  components  of  other  comprehensive  income  as  part  of  the  statement  of  stockholders’ 
equity. These new rules are to be applied retrospectively and become effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within
those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (April 1, 2012 for the Company), with early adoption permitted. 

29 

We do not  expect  the  adoption  of  this new guidance  to have  a  material  effect on our consolidated  financial position,  cash 
flows or results of operations. 

Fluctuations in Operating Results and Seasonality

We have experienced fluctuations in quarterly and annual operating results as a result of: the timing of the introduction of 
new titles; variations in sales of titles developed for particular platforms; market acceptance of our titles; development and 
promotional  expenses  relating  to  the  introduction  of  new  titles,  sequels  or  enhancements  of  existing  titles;  projected  and
actual  changes  in  platforms;  the  timing  and  success  of  title  introductions  by  our  competitors;  product  returns;  changes  in
pricing policies by us and our competitors; the size and timing of acquisitions; the timing of orders from major customers; 
with peak shipments typically 
order cancellations; and delays in product shipment. Sales of our products are also seasonal, 
occurring in the fourth calendar quarter as a result of increased demand for titles during the holiday season. Quarterly and 
annual comparisons of operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating results.

r

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of net revenue represented by certain line items in o
statements of operations, net revenue by geographic region and net revenue by platform:

y

ur 

Net revenue
Cost of goods sold 
Gross profit 

Selling and marketing 
General and administrative 
Research and development 
  Depreciation and amortization 
Total operating expenses 
Income (loss) from operations 
Interest and other, net 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
Provision for income taxes 
Income (loss) from continuing operations 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
Net income (loss) 

Net revenue by geographic region:

United States 
International 

Net revenue by platform:

Console 
PC and other 
Handheld 

Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 

(thousands of dollars)
Net revenue

Product costs
Software development costs and  

royalties(1)
Internal royalties 
Licenses 

Cost of goods sold 
Gross profit

2012

%

2011

%

$825,823 100.0% $1,136,876 100.0%
28.7%
255,236

326,936

30.9%

164,487
34,156
74,976
528,855
$296,968

19.9%
4.1%
9.1%
64.0%
36.0%

172,397
115,032
75,016
689,381
$447,495

15.2%
10.1%
6.6%
60.6%
39.4%

(1) 

Includes $5,144 and $10,695 of stock-based compensation expense in 2012 and 2011, respectively.

30 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2010
2011
100.0% 100.0%
64.8%
60.6%
35.2%
39.4%
15.5%
20.3%
15.2%
9.6%
7.6%
6.1%
2.1%
1.3%
45.2%
32.5%
6.9% (10.0)%
(2.5)%
5.7% (12.5)%
1.7%
1.0%
4.7% (14.2)%
(1.9)%
4.2% (16.1)%

2012
100.0% 
64.0% 
36.0% 
22.3% 
14.7%
7.8%
1.4% 
46.2% 
(10.2)%
(2.4)%
(12.6)%
0.4% 
(13.0)%
(0.2)%
(13.2)%

(0.5)%

(1.2)%

54.4%
45.6%

85.1%
10.6%
4.3%

54.5%
45.5%

85.7%
9.7%
4.6%

59.6%
40.4%

80.4%
9.3%
10.3%

Increase/
(decrease)
$(311,053)
(71,700)

(7,910)
(80,876)
(40)
(160,526)
$(150,527)

% Increase/
(decrease)

(27.4)%
(21.9)%

(4.6)%
(70.3)%
(0.1)%
(23.3)%
(33.6)%

Net revenue decreased $311.1 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 as compared to the prior year. This decrease 
is primarily due to $486.9 million in lower sales of the previous fiscal year’s releases mainly Red Dead Redemption, which
Sid  Meier’s  Civilization®  V,  which  released  in 
released  in  May 2010,  Mafia  II,  which  released  in  August 2010, 
September 2010, and Top Spin 4, which released in March 2011, as well as approximately $46.8 million in lower sales of our
Grand  Theft  Auto  franchise.  These  decreases  were  partially  offset  by $283.9 million  in  increases  from  the  current  fiscal 
year’s releases mainly L.A. Noire in May 2011, Duke Nukem Forever in June 2011 and 

The Darkness II in February 2012. 

r

I

II

Net revenue on consoles accounted for 85.1% of our total net revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, which was in
line with 85.7% for the prior year. PC and other sales increased to 10.6% of our total net revenue for the fiscal year ended 
March 31, 2012, as compared to 9.7% for the prior year, primarily due to the December 2011 release of Grand Theft Auto III:
10 Year  Anniversary  Edition for  the  iPad,  iPhone  and  iPod  touch,  and  select  Android  powered  devices.  Handheld  sales 
accounted for 4.3% of our total net revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, which is in line with 4.6% for the prior
year.

Gross profit as a percentage of net revenue decreased for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the prior year.
Product costs increased as a percentage of net revenue as a result of a greater share of net revenue being generated from a
product  mix  with  lower  selling  price  points.  Software  development  costs  and  royalties  increased  as  a  percentage  of  net 
revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 as we incurred higher royalty costs primarily associated with the May 2011
The Darkness II, all of 
release of L.A. Noire, the June 2011 release of Duke Nukem Forever and the February 2012 release of 
which  were  externally  developed.  Partially  offsetting  the  decrease in  gross  profit  as  a  percentage  of  net  revenue  is  lower 
internal royalty expense, which was primarily due to higher income generated in the prior year from the release of 
Red Dead 
Redemption in May 2010.

r

II

r

Net  revenue  earned  outside  of  the  United  States  accounted  for  45.6%  of  our  total  net  revenue  for  the  fiscal  year  ended 
March 31, 2012, which was in line with 45.5% for the prior year. Foreign currency exchange rates increased net revenue and 
gross  profit  by  approximately  $20.3 million  and  $3.2 million,  respectively,  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2012  as
compared to the prior year. 

Operating Expenses

(thousands of dollars)

Selling and marketing 
General and administrative
Research and development 
Depreciation and amortization 

Total operating expenses(1)

2012
  $183,749
  121,200
64,162
12,123
  $381,234

2011

% of net
revenue
22.3% $176,294
109,484
14.7%
69,576
7.8%
14,999
1.4%
46.2% $370,353

% of net
revenue

15.5% 
9.6% 
6.1% 
1.3% 
32.5% 

Increase/
(decrease)
$7,455
11,716
(5,414)
(2,876)
  $10,881

% Increase/
(decrease)
4.2%
10.7%
(7.8)%
(19.2)%
2.9%

(1) 

Includes stock-based compensation expense, as follows: 

Selling and marketing
General and administrative 
Research and development 

2012

$ 5,042
$19,963
$ 3,345

2011

$4,659
$9,781
$3,630

Foreign currency exchange rates increased total operating expenses by approximately  $7.7 million in the fiscal year ended 
March 31, 2012 as compared to the prior year. 

Selling and marketing

Selling  and  marketing  expenses  increased  $7.5 million  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2012,  as  compared  to  the  prior 
year, primarily due to higher advertising expenses related to L.A. Noire, Duke Nukem Forever and
The Darkness II partially
offset by lower advertising expenses incurred for the May 2010 release of Red Dead Redemption and the August 2010 release
of Mafia II.II

r

I

31 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative

General and administrative expenses increased $11.7 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the 
prior year primarily due to a $12.9 million increase in stock-based compensation expense for stock-based awards granted to
ZelnickMedia, reflecting the grants of restricted stock pursuant to the New Management Agreement (as defined in Note 3 to 
our Consolidated Financial Statements), $2.5 million of income resulting from a favorable legal settlement in the prior year 
and $2.4 million in additional rent expense primarily due to a net liability incurred for a lease assumption without economic 
benefit during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012. Partially offsetting the increase in general and administrative expenses is
a decrease of $4.4 million for personnel costs and a decrease of $3.0 million for consulting expense, primarily due to lower 
performance-based incentive compensation as a result of the Company’s performance. 

General  and  administrative  expenses  for  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2012  and 2011  include  occupancy  expense 
(primarily  rent,  utilities  and  office  expenses)  of  $15.7 million  and  $14.3 million,  respectively,  related  to  our  development 
studios.

Research and development

Research  and  development  expenses  decreased  $5.4 million  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2012,  as  compared  to  the
in production  expenses  and  higher  payroll
f
prior  year  primarily  due  to  a  decrease  of  $6.7 million  attributable  to  a  decrease 
capitalization  rates  at  our  development  studios  primarily  due  to  a  greater  number  of  titles  having  reached  technological 
feasibility partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in additional personnel-related costs.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $2.9 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the 
prior year primarily due to lower purchases of fixed assets during recent years.

Interest and other, net 

(thousands of dollars)
Interest income (expense), net 
Gain (loss) on sale
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)
Other 
Interest and other, net

2012
$(20,616)
2,200
(1,311)
156
$(19,571)

2011

% of net
revenue
(2.5)% $(15,248)
(106)
1,414
421
(2.4)% $(13,519)

0.3%
(0.2)%
0.0%

% of net
revenue

Increase/
(decrease)

% Increase/
(decrease)

(1.3)%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
(1.2)%

$(5,368) 
2,306 
(2,725) 
(265)
$(6,052) 

35.2%
(2175.5)%
(192.7)%
(62.9)%
44.8%

Interest and other, net was an expense of $19.6 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, as compared to an expense
of $13.5 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, primarily due to $5.4 million in interest expense associated with
the November 2011 issuance of the 1.75% Convertible Notes and we recorded a greater foreign currency exchange loss for 
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 partially offset by a $2.2 million gain on the sale of certain intellectual property assets.

Provision for income taxes

Income tax expense was $3.9 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, as compared to $9.8 million for the fiscal year 
ended  March 31,  2011.  The  decrease  in  tax  expense  was  primarily  due  to  lower  taxable  earnings  in  certain  foreign 
jurisdictions  and  adjustments  for  certain  foreign  tax  filings.  Our  effective  tax  rate  differed  from  the  federal  statutory  rate 
primarily due to changes in valuation allowances and changes in gross unrecognized tax benefits during both the fiscal years 
ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. Our valuation allowances increased by $19.5 million during the fiscal year ended March 31,
2012  primarily  due  to  a  loss  before  income  taxes  without  tax benefit  in  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2012,  while  our 
valuation allowance decreased by $26.6 million during the same period in 2011 primarily due to the use of carried forward 
net operating losses applied to income earned during that period.

As of March 31, 2012, we had gross unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, of $22.4 million, all of which
would  affect  our  effective  tax  rate  if  realized.  For  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2012,  gross  unrecognized  tax  benefits 
increased by $7.3 million, which primarily related to an increase in uncertain tax positions in foreign jurisdictions. We are 
generally no longer subject to audit for U.S. federal income tax returns for periods prior to our fiscal year ended October 31,
2008 and state income tax returns for periods prior to fiscal year ended October 31, 2004. With few exceptions, we are no

32 

longer  subject  to  income tax  examinations  in  non-U.S.  jurisdictions  for  years  prior  to  fiscal  year  ended  October 31,  2005. 
ng October 31, 2008 and 2009. Certain U.S.
U.S. federal taxing authorities have commenced their audit of fiscal years endi
state  taxing  authorities  are  currently  examining  our  income  tax  returns  from  fiscal  years  ended  October 31,  2004  through
October 31,  2006.  In  addition,  tax  authorities  in  certain  non-U.S.  jurisdictions  are  currently  examining  our  income  tax
returns. The determination as to further adjustments to our gross unrecognized tax benefits during the next 12 months is not 
practicable.

aa

We  are  regularly  audited  by  domestic  and  foreign  taxing  authorities.  Audits  may  result  in  tax  assessments  in  excess  of 
amounts claimed and the payment of additional taxes. We believe that our tax positions comply with applicable tax law, and 
that we have adequately provided for reasonably foreseeable tax assessments. 

Discontinued operations 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax, reflects the results of our former distribution business for which the net
assets were sold in February 2010. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, the net loss was $1.1 million as compared to a
net loss of $5.3 million for the prior year. The net loss during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 was primarily due to costs
associated with a liability for a lease assumption without economic benefit less estimates of sublease income. The net loss
during  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31, 2012  was  primarily  due  to  changes  in  estimates  of  sublease  income  primarily  as  a 
result of deteriorating market conditions.

Net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, our net loss was $108.8 million, as compared to net income of $48.5 million in the
prior year. Net loss per share for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 was $1.31, as compared to earnings per share of $0.56 
for  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2011.  Weighted  average  shares  outstanding  decreased  compared  to  the  prior  year,
primarily due to the exclusion of unvested share-based awards that are considered participating restricted stock due to the net
loss generated during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, offset, in part, by the vesting of restricted stock awards over the
last twelve months. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding earnings (loss)
per share. 

d

t

Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 

(thousands of dollars)
Net revenue

Product costs 
Software development costs and 

royalties(1)
Internal royalties
Licenses 

Cost of goods sold 
Gross profit

2011
$1,136,876
326,936

%

2010

100.0% $762,941
253,369
28.7%

172,397
115,032
75,016
689,381
$447,495

140,397
15.2%
35,195
10.1%
65,618
6.6%
494,579
60.6%
39.4% $268,362

%
100.0% 
33.2% 

Increase/
(decrease)
  $373,935 
73,567 

18.4%
4.6% 
8.6% 
64.8% 
35.2% 

32,000 
79,837 
9,398 
194,802 
  $179,133 

% Increase/
(decrease)

49.0%
29.0%

22.8%
226.8%
14.3%
39.4%
66.8%

(1) 

Includes $10,695 and $5,213 of stock-based compensation expense in 2011 and 2010, respectively.

K

Net revenue increased $373.9 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the prior year, primarily due 
to the releases of Red Dead Redemption in May 2010 and Mafia II in August 2010 and a period-over-period increase in sales 
of  our  NBA 2K  franchise.  Partially  offsetting  the  increas
e  in  net  revenue  were  decreases  in BioShock  2 and  Borderlands,
which  were  released  in  February  2010  and  October 2009,  respectively,  and  a  decrease  in  sales  of  our  Grand  Theft  Auto
franchise of approximately $63.5 million. The decrease in our Grand Theft Auto franchise was primarily due to decreases in 
Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars, as well as from downloadable episodes Grand Theft 
sales from Grand Theft Auto IV and 
Auto IV: The Lost and Damned and 
Grand Theft Auto: The Ballad of Gay Tony, which released in prior periods, partially
offset by the current year release of Grand Theft Auto IV: Complete.

V
d

I

Net  revenue  on  consoles  accounted  for  approximately  85.7%  of  our  total  net  revenue  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31, 
2011,  as  compared  to  80.4%  for  the  prior  year.  The  increase  is  primarily  due  to  releases  of  Red  Dead  Redemption in 
May 2010 and Mafia II in August 2010 and a period-over-period increase in our 
NBA franchise. PC and other sales increased 
to approximately 9.7% of our total net revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as compared to 9.3% for the prior

I

33 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
year, primarily due to the September 2010 release of Sid Meier’s Civilization® V. Handheld sales decreased to 4.6% of our 
total  net  revenue  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2011,  as  compared  to  10.3%  for  the  prior  year  primarily  due  to  a
decrease in sales of Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars, which released on the PSP in October 2009 and the Nintendo DS in
March 2009,  as  well  as  the  effect  of  the  increased  net  revenue  on  current  generation  consoles  for  the  fiscal  year  ended 
March 31, 2011 mentioned above.

VV

Gross profit as a percentage of net revenue increased in 2011 compared to the prior year primarily due to improved pricing 
mix  resulting  from  the  release  of  Red  Dead  Redemption in  May 2010  and  higher  development  royalties  in  the  prior  year 
primarily due to the October 2009 release of the externally developed Borderlands, partially offset by higher internal royalty 
expense, which was primarily due to increased income generated from Red Dead Redemption.

Net revenue earned outside of the United States accounted for 45.5% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as compared
to 40.4% in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to the global release of Red Dead Redemption in May 2010 while
2K Sports titles, which are mostly sold in North America, made up a larger proportion of our net revenue during the fiscal
year  ended  March 31,  2010.  Foreign  currency  exchange  rates  decreased  net  revenue  and  gross  profit  by  approximately
$9.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the prior year.

Operating Expenses

(thousands of dollars)

Selling and marketing 
General and administrative
Research and development 
  Depreciation and amortization 
Total operating expenses(1)

2011
$176,294
109,484
69,576
14,999
$370,353

% of net
revenue

2010

% of net
revenue

Increase/
(decrease)

% Increase/
(decrease)

15.5% $154,519
115,673
9.6%
57,888
6.1%
16,403
1.3%
32.5% $344,483

20.3%
15.2%
7.6%
2.1%
45.2%

$21,775 
(6,189) 
11,688 
(1,404)
$25,870 

14.1%
(5.4)%
20.2%
(8.6)%
7.5%

(1) 

Includes stock-based compensation expense, as follows: 

Selling and marketing
General and administrative 
Research and development

2011

$4,659
$9,781
$3,630

2010

$ 3,321
$14,319
$ 3,650

Foreign currency exchange rates decreased total operating expenses by approximately $2.0 million in the fiscal year ended 
March 31, 2011 as compared to the prior year. 

y

Selling and marketing

Selling and marketing expenses increased $21.8 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as compared to the prior 
year  primarily  due  to  higher  advertising  expenses  related  to Red  Dead  Redemption and  Mafia II partially  offset  by  lower 
advertising expenses incurred for the February 2010 release of BioShock 2, the October 2009 release of Borderlands and the
Grand Theft Auto franchise. 

I

General and administrative

General  and  administrative  expenses  decreased  $6.2 million  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2011,  as  compared  to  the 
prior year primarily due to reduced salary expense as a result of cost cutting initiatives, $2.5 million of income as a result of a
favorable legal settlement and $2.4 million of reduced stock-based compensation expense related to the stock options issued 
to ZelnickMedia as they became fully vested in August 2010. The decrease was partially offset by higher performance-based 
incentive compensation as a result of the Company’s improved performance. 

General  and  administrative  expenses  for  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2011  and 2010  include  occupancy  expense 
(primarily  rent,  utilities  and  office  expenses)  of  $14.3 million  and  $14.8 million,  respectively,  related  to  our  development 
studios.

34 

Research and development

Research and development expenses increased $11.7 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as compared to the
prior year primarily due to lower payroll capitalization rates at our development studios due to the transition of efforts bein
g
t
refocused to new projects following the May 2010 release of Red Dead Redemption and an increase in production expenses. 

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $1.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as compared to the 
prior year primarily due to lower purchases of fixed assets during the current period.

Interest and other, net 

(thousands of dollars)
Interest expense, net 
Loss on sale of subsidiary
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) 
Other 
Interest and other, net

2011
$(15,248)
(106)
1,414
421
$(13,519)

% of net
revenue

2010

% of net
revenue

(1.3)% $(13,584)
(3,831)
(609)
(770)
(1.2)% $(18,794)

0.0%
0.1%
0.0%

(1.8)% 
(0.5)% 
(0.1)% 
(0.1)%
(2.5)%

Increase/
(decrease)
$(1,664)
3,725
2,023
1,191
$5,275

% Increase/
(decrease)

12.2%
(97.2)%
(332.2)%
(154.7)%
(28.1)%

Interest and other, net was an expense of $13.5 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as compared to an expense
of $18.8 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to a loss on the sale of our Italian subsidiary during
the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2010  and  we  recorded  a  greater  foreign  currency exchange  gain  for  the  fiscal  year  ended 
March 31, 2011, partially offset by higher interest expense. The increase in interest expense, net is primarily due to higher 
average debt and interest rates for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011. 

Provision for income taxes 

Income tax expense was $9.8 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, compared to $13.1 million for the fiscal year 
ended March 31, 2010. The tax in 2011 is due to increased income in the foreign jurisdictions, while the 2010 tax expense
related to an increase to our valuation allowance as a result of deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill and a tax expense
resulting from the cancellation of stock options. Our effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate primarily due to 
changes in valuation allowances and changes in gross unrecognized tax benefits during both the 2011 and 2010 periods. Our 
valuation  allowances  decreased  by  $26.6 million  during  the  2011  period  primarily due  to  the  use  of  net  operating  losses,
while  our  valuation  allowance  increased  by  $25.1 million  during  the  same  period  in 2010  primarily  due  to  taxable  losses
incurred during the period.

y

As of March 31, 2011, we had gross unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, of $15.1 million, all of which
would  affect  our  effective  tax  rate  if  realized.  For  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2011,  gross  unrecognized  tax  benefits 
increased  by  $4.2 million,  primarily  related  to  domestic  tax  issues.  We  are generally  no  longer  subject  to  audit  for  U.S.
federal income tax returns for periods prior to our fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 and state income tax returns for periods
prior to fiscal year ended October 31, 2004. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to income tax examinations in 
non-U.S. jurisdictions for years prior to fiscal year ended October 31, 2005. U.S. federal taxing authorities have completed 
examinations of our income tax returns through the fiscal years ended October 31, 2006 and have recently informed us of 
their intent to audit subsequent years through fiscal year ending October 31, 2009. Certain U.S. state taxing authorities are
currently examining our income tax returns from fiscal years ended October 31, 2004 through October 31, 2006. In addition,
tax  authorities  in  certain  non-U.S.  jurisdictions  are  currently  examining  our  income  tax  returns.  The  determination  as  to
further adjustments to our gross unrecognized tax benefits during the next 12 months is not practicable. 

We  are  regularly  audited  by  domestic  and  foreign  taxing  authorities.  Audits  may  result  in  tax  assessments  in  excess  of 
amounts claimed and the payment of additional taxes. We believe that our tax positions comply with applicable tax law, and 
that we have adequately provided for reasonably foreseeable tax assessments.

35 

Discontinued operations

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax, reflects the results of our former distribution business for which the net
assets were sold in February 2010. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, the loss was $5.3 million as compared to a loss 
of $14.9 million for the prior year. The loss during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 is primarily due to costs associated 
with  a  net  liability  for  a  lease  assumption  without  economic  benefit.  The  loss  generated  during  the  fiscal  year  ended 
March 31, 2010 is primarily due to the impairment of goodwill and intangible assets, net of income tax, and also reflected our 
active involvement in the distribution business at that time.

Net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, our net income was $48.5 million, as compared to a net loss of $123.0 million in 
the prior year. Earnings per share for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 was $0.56, as compared to a net loss per share of 
$1.58  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2010.  Total  weighted  average  shares  outstanding  for  the  fiscal  year  ended
March 31,  2011  increased  compared  to  the  prior  year  period  primarily  due  to  the  inclusion  of  the  dilutive  effect  of 
participating restricted stock for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 and the vesting of restricted stock over the last twelve
months. 

Liquidity and Capital Resources 

Our  primary  cash  requirements  have  been  to  fund  (i) the  development,  manufacturing  and  marketing  of  our  published 
products,  (ii) working  capital,  (iii) acquisitions  and  (iv) capital  expenditures.  We  expect  to  rely  on  funds  provided  by  our 
operating activities, our Credit Agreement and our Convertible Notes to satisfy our working capital needs. 

Credit Agreement 

In  October 2011,  we  entered  into  a  Second  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  Agreement  (the  “Credit  Agreement”)  which 
amended  and  restated  our  July 2007  Credit  Agreement.  The  Credit  Agreement  provides  for  borrowings  of  up  to 
$100.0 million, which may be increased by up to $40.0 million pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, and is secured 
by  substantially  all  of  our  assets  and  the  equity  of  our  subsidiaries.  The  Credit  Agreement  expires  on  October 17,  2016. 
Revolving  loans  under  the  Credit  Agreement  bear  interest  at our  election  of  (a) 1.50%  to  2.00%  above  a  certain  base  rate
(4.75% at March 31, 2012), or (b) 2.50% to 3.00% above the LIBOR Rate (approximately 2.74% at March 31, 2012), with
the margin rate subject to the achievement of certain average liquidity levels. We are also required to pay a monthly fee on
the unused available balance, ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% based on availability.

Prior to its amendment and restatement in October 2011, the July 2007 Credit Agreement provided for borrowings of up to 
$140.0 million and was secured by substantially all of our assets and the equity of our subsidiaries. We had no outstanding
borrowings at March 31, 2011 related to the July 2007 Credit Agreement.

Availability under the Credit Agreement is restricted by our domestic and United Kingdom based accounts receivable and 
inventory balances. The Credit Agreement also allows for the issuance of letters of credit in an aggregate amount of up to
$25.0 million. 

As of March 31, 2012, there was $79.1 million available to borrow under the Credit Agreement. At March 31, 2012, we had 
no outstanding borrowings related to the Credit Agreement and $1.7 million of letters of credit outstanding.

The Credit Agreement contains covenants that substantially limit us and our subsidiaries’ ability to: create, incur, assume or 
be liable for indebtedness; dispose of assets outside the ordinary course of business; acquire, merge or consolidate with or 
into another person or entity; create, incur or allow any lien on any of their respective properties; make investments; or pay 
dividends or make distributions (each subject to certain limitations); or optionally prepay any indebtedness (subject to certain
exceptions,  including  an  exception  permitting  the  redemption  of  the  Company’s Convertible  Notes  upon  the  meeting  of 
certain  minimum  liquidity  requirements).  In  addition,  the  Credit Agreement  provides  for  certain  events  of  default  such  as
nonpayment  of  principal  and  interest,  breaches  of  representations  and  warranties,  noncompliance  with  covenants,  acts  of 
n
insolvency,  default  on  indebtedness  held  by  third-parties  and  default  on  certain
  material  contracts  (subject  to  certain
d
limitations and cure periods). The Credit Agreement also contains a requirement that we maintain an interest coverage ratio 
of more than one to one for the trailing twelve month period, if certain average liquidity levels fall below $30.0 million. As of
March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all covenants and requirements outlined

 in the Credit Agreement.

aa

4.375% Convertible Notes Due 2014 

In  June 2009,  we  issued  $138.0 million  aggregate  principal amount  of  4.375%  Convertible  Notes  due 2014  (the  “4.375%
Convertible  Notes”).  Interest  on  the  4.375%  Convertible  Notes  is  payable  semi-annually  in  arrears  on  June 1st and 
December 1st of each year, and commenced on December 1, 2009. The 4.375% Convertible Notes mature on June 1, 2014, 
unless earlier redeemed or repurchased by the Company or converted. 

t

t

36 

The  4.375%  Convertible  Notes  are  convertible  at  an  initial  conversion  rate  of  93.6768  shares  of  our  common  stock  per 
$1,000 principal amount of 4.375% Convertible Notes (representing an initial conversion price of approximately $10.675 per
share of common stock for a total of approximately 12,927,000 underlying conversion shares) subject to adjustment in certain 
circumstances.  Holders  may  convert  the  4.375%  Convertible  Notes  at  their  option  prior  to  the  close  of  business  on  the
business day immediately preceding December 1, 2013 only under the following circumstances: (1) during any fiscal quarter 
commencing after July 31, 2009, if the last reported sale price of the common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or 
not consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter 
is  greater  than  or  equal  to  130%  of  the  applicable  conversion  price  on  each  applicable  trading  day;  (2) during  the  five 
business day period after any 10 consecutive trading day period (the “measurement period”) in which the trading price per 
$1,000  principal  amount  of  4.375%  Convertible  Notes  for  each  day  of  that  measurement  period  was  less  than  98%  of  the 
ion rate on each such day; (3) if we call
product of the last reported sale price of our common stock and the applicable convers
the 4.375% Convertible Notes for redemption, at any time prior to the close of business on the third scheduled trading day 
prior to the redemption date; or (4) upon the occurrence of specified corporate events. On and after December 1, 2013 until
the close of business on the third scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may convert their 
4.375% Convertible Notes at any time, regardless of the foregoing circumstances. Upon conversion, the 4.375% Convertible
Notes  may  be  settled,  at  our  election,  in  cash,  shares  of  our  common  stock,  or  a  combination  of  cash  and  shares  of  our 
common stock. Our common stock price exceeded 130% of the applicable conversion price of $10.675 per share for at least 
20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading days ended March 31, 2012. Accordingly, as of April 1, 2012, the 4.375% 
Convertible Notes may be converted at the holder’s option through June 30, 2012. If the 4.375% Convertible Notes were to
be converted during this period, our current intent and ability, given our option, would be to settle the conversion in shares of 
our common stock. As such, we have continued to classify these 4.375% Convertible Notes as long-term debt. 

f

At any time on or after June 5, 2012, the Company may redeem all of the outstanding 4.375% C
onvertible Notes for cash, but 
m
only if the last reported sale of our common stock for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days
ending  on  the  trading  day  prior  to  the  date  we  provide  notice  of  redemption  to  holders  of  the  4.375%  Convertible  Notes 
exceeds  150%  of  the  conversion  price  in  effect  on  each  such  trading  day.  The  redemption  price  will  equal  100%  of  the 
principal amount of the 4.375% Convertible Notes to be redeemed, plus all accrued and unpaid interest (including additional
interest, if any) to, but excluding, the redemption date. 

The indenture governing the 4.375% Convertible Notes contains customary terms and covenants and events of default. As of 
March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all covenants and requirements outlined in the indenture governing the 4.375%
Convertible Notes. 

1.75% Convertible Notes Due 2016 

On  November 16,  2011,  we  issued  $250.0 million  aggregate  principal  amount  of  1.75%  Convertible  Notes  due 2016  (the
le Notes, the “Convertible Notes”). Interest on the 1.75% 
“1.75% Convertible Notes” and together with the 4.375% Convertib
t
st of  each  year,  commencing  on  June 1,
t
Convertible  Notes  is  payable  semi-annually  in  arrears  on  June 1st and  December 1
2012. The 1.75% Convertible Notes mature on December 1, 2016, unless earlier repurchased by the Company or converted.
The Company does not have the right to redeem the 1.75% Convertible No

tes prior to maturity. 

m

r

The 1.75% Convertible Notes are convertible at an initial conversion rate of 52.3745 shares of our common stock per $1,000
principal amount of 1.75% Convertible Notes (representing an initial conversion price of approximately $19.093 per share of 
common  stock  for  a  total  of  approximately 13,094,000  underlying  conversion  shares)  subject  to  adjustment  in  certain 
circumstances. Holders may convert the 1.75% Convertible Notes at their option prior to the close of business on the business 
day immediately preceding June 1, 2016 only under the following circumstances: (1) during any fiscal quarter commencing
after  March 31,  2012,  if  the  last  reported  sale  price  of  the  common  stock  for  at  least  20 trading  days  (whether  or  not 
consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter is 
greater than or equal to 130% of the applicable conversion price on each applicable trading day; (2) during the five business
day  period  after  any  10 consecutive  trading  day  period  (the “measurement  period”)  in  which  the  trading  price  per  $1,000
principal amount of 1.75% Convertible Notes for each day of that measurement period was less than 98% of the product of 
the  last  reported  sale  price  of  our  common  stock  and  the  applicable  conversion  rate  on  each  such  day;  or  (3) upon  the 
occurrence  of  specified  corporate events.  On  and  after  June 1,  2016  until  the  close  of  business  on  the  business  day
immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may convert their 1.75% Convertible Notes at any time, regardless of the
foregoing circumstances. Upon conversion, the 1.75% Convertible Notes may be settled, at our election, in cash, shares of 
our common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock.

t

The indenture governing the 1.75% Convertible Notes contains customary terms and covenants and events of default. As of 
March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all covenants and requirements outlined in the indenture governing the 1.75% 
Convertible Notes.

37 

Financial Condition

We  are  subject  to  credit  risks,  particularly  if  any  of  our  receivables  represent  a  limited  number  of  customers  or  are
concentrated in foreign markets. If we are unable to collect our accounts receivable as they become due, it could adversely
affect our liquidity and working capital position. 

Generally,  we  have  been  able  to  collect  our  accounts  receivable  in  the  ordinary  course  of  business.  We  do  not  hold  any 
collateral  to  secure payment  from  customers. We have  trade  credit  insurance on  the  majority  of  our  customers  to  mitigate
accounts receivable risk.

A  majority  of  our  trade  receivables  are  derived  from  sales  to  major  retailers  and  distributors.  Our  five  largest  customers
accounted  for  43.9%,  43.8%,  and  59.8%  of  net  revenue  during  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2012,  2011  and 2010, 
respectively.  As  of  March 31,  2012  and 2011,  our  five  largest  customers  accounted  for  61.3%  and  54.2%  of  our  gross
accounts receivable, respectively. Customers that individually accounted for more than 10% of our gross accounts receivable
balance  comprised  40.6%  and  38.2%  of  such  balances  at  March 31,  2012  and 2011,  respectively.  We  believe  that  the
receivable balances from these largest customers do not represent a significant credit risk based on past collection experience,
although  we  actively  monitor  each  customer’s  credit  worthiness  and  economic  conditions  that  may  affect  our  customers’
business and access to capital. We are monitoring the current global economic conditions, including credit markets and other 
factors as it relates to our customers in order to manage the risk of uncollectible accounts receivable.

We believe our current cash and cash equivalents and projected cash flow from operations, along with availability under our 
Credit  Agreement  will  provide  us  with  sufficient  liquidity  to  satisfy  our  cash  requirements  for  working  capital,  capital
expenditures and commitments through at least the next 12 months.

As  of  March 31,  2012,  the  amount  of  cash  and  cash  equivalents  held  outside  of  the  U.S.  by  our  foreign  subsidiaries  was 
approximately $124.5 million. These balances are dispersed across various locations around the world. We believe that such 
dispersion  meets  the  business  and  liquidity  needs  of  our  foreign  affiliates.  In addition,  the  Company  expects  in  the
foreseeable future to have the ability to generate sufficient cash domestically to support o
ngoing operations. Consequently, it
is  the  Company’s  intention  to  indefinitely  reinvest  undistributed  earnings  of  its  foreign  subsidiaries.  In  the  event  the
Company needed to repatriate funds outside of the U.S., such repatriation may be subject to local laws and tax consequences 
including foreign withholding taxes or U.S. income taxes. It is not practicable to estimate th
e tax liability and the Company
would try to minimize the tax effect to the extent possible. However, any repatriation may not result in actual cash payments
as the taxable event would likely be offset by the utilization of the then available net operating losses and tax credits. 

f

t

t

Our changes in cash flows were as follows: 

(thousands of dollars)

Cash (used in) provided by operating activities 
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities
Cash provided by financing activities 
Effects of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2011
  $134,798 
(7,578) 
734 
6,567 
$134,521 

2010
$(135,702)
23,025
45,784
8,593
$(58,300)

2012
$(84,964) 
(14,162)
243,364
(4,318)
$139,920

At March 31, 2012 we had $420.3 million of cash and cash equivalents, compared to $280.4
million at March 31, 2011. Our 
qq
increase in cash and cash equivalents from March 31, 2011 was primarily a result of cash provided by financing activities 
partially  offset  by  cash  used  in  operating  activities,  cash  used  in  investing  activities  and  the  effect  of  foreign  currency 
exchange rates.

Cash  provided  by  financing  activities  was  generated  from  the  net  proceeds  from  the  issuance  of  $250.0 million  of  1.75%
Convertible Notes in November 2011. Cash used in operating activities was primarily due to our net loss of $108.8 million. 
Cash  used  in  investing  activities  was  primarily  due  to  purchases  of  fixed  assets  of  $10.8 million  and  the  payment  of 
contingent consideration of $4.1 million for our prior year acquisitions. Cash and cash equivalents were negatively affected 
by $4.3 million as a result of foreign currency exchange rate movements. 

38 

Contractual Obligations and Commitments 

We have entered into various agreements in the ordinary course of business that require substantial cash commitments over 
the next several years. Generally, these include:

•  Agreements to acquire licenses to intellectual property such as trademarks, copyrights and technology for use in 
the  publishing,  marketing  and  distribution  of  our  software  titles.  In  addition,  we  have  certain  minimum
marketing  support  commitments  where  we  commit  to  spend  specified  amounts  related  to  marketing  our 
products. Our licensing and marketing commitments primarily reflect agreements with major sports leagues and 
players’ associations and expire at various times through September 2018;

•  Contractual  payments  to  third-party  software  developers  that  expire  at  various  times  through  July 2014. 

Guaranteed minimum payments assume satisfactory performance;

•  Operating  leases,  primarily  related  to occupancy,  furniture  and  equipment,  expiring  at  various  times  through
March 2023. Included in the cash commitments for operating leases below is a liability for a lease assumption
without  economic  benefit,  which  was  approximately  $3.7 million  at  March 31,  2012,  and  is  recorded  in
liabilities  of  discontinued  operations  on  the  consolidated  balance  sheet.  See  Note 2 to  our  Consolidated 
Financial Statements for additional information regarding discontinued operations; and 

• 

Purchase  obligations  primarily  related  to  agreements  to  purchase  services  that  are  enforceable  and  legally 
binding  on  the  Company  that  specifies  all  significant  terms,  including  fixed,  minimum  or  variable  pricing
provisions; and the approximate timing of the transactions, expiring at various times through October 2015.

A summary of annual minimum contractual obligations and commitments as of March 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands of 
dollars):

Fiscal Year Ending March 31,
2013 
2014 
2015 
2016 
2017 
Thereafter 
Total

Licensing and 
Marketing

$61,591 
16,520 
10,825 
13,893 
12,400 
20,250 
$135,479

Operating
Software 
Development
Leases
$16,506
$37,759
14,991
10,728
11,073
809
9,804
—
—
4,958
— 29,828
$87,160

$49,296

Purchase
Obligations
$4,057
4,305
2,341
899
—
—
$11,602

Convertible
Notes Interest

Convertible
Notes

Total

$10,595 
10,413 
7,394 
4,375 
4,375 
—
$37,152 

138,000

$— $130,508
— 56,957
170,442
— 28,971
271,733
— 50,078
$388,000 $708,689

250,000

In addition to the cash commitments above, we have also entered into acquisition agreements that contain provisions for us to
pay  contingent  cash  consideration,  typically  contingent  on  the  acquired company achieving  certain  financial, unit  sales,  or 
performance conditions. The amount and timing of these payments are currently not fixed or determinable. See Note 5 to the 
Consolidated Financial Statements for a full discussion of our potential acquisition commitments.

Income Taxes.  At March 31, 2012, the Company had recorded a liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits of $15.6 million 
for which we are unable to make a reasonable and reliable estimate of the period in which these liabilities will be settled witht
the respective tax authorities, therefore, these liabilities have not been included in the contractual obligations table.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial parties, such as
entities often referred to as structured finance or variable interest entities, which would have been established for the purpose
of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we do not have any
off-balance sheet arrangements and are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had
engaged in such relationships. 

y

International Operations

Net revenue earned outside of the United States is principally generated by our operations in Europe, Asia, Australia, Canada 
and  Latin  America.  For  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31, 2012,  2011  and 2010,  approximately  45.6%,  45.5%  and  40.4%, 
respectively,  of  our  net  revenue  was  earned  outside  the  United  States.  We are  subject  to  risks  inherent  in  foreign  trade, 
including  increased  credit  risks,  tariffs  and  duties,  fluctuations  in  foreign  currency  exchange  rates,  shipping  delays  and 
international  political,  regulatory  and  economic  developments,  all  of  which  can  have a  significant  effect  on  our  operating 
results.

39 

Fluctuations in Quarterly Operating Results and Seasonality

We  have  experienced  fluctuations  in  quarterly  operating  results as  a  result  of  the  timing  of  the  introduction  of  new  titles; 
variations in sales of titles developed for particular platforms; market acceptance of our titles; development and promotional
expenses relating to the introduction of new titles; sequels or enhancements of existing titles; projected and actual changes in
platforms; the timing and success of title introductions by our competitors; product returns; changes in pricing policies by us
and our competitors; the accuracy of retailers’ forecasts of consumer demand; the size and timing of acquisitions; the timing
of orders from major customers; and order cancellations and delays in product shipment. Sales of our titles are also seasonal,
with peak shipments typically occurring in the fourth calendar quarter as a result of increased demand for titles during the
holiday season. Quarterly comparisons of operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating results.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 

Market  risk  is  the  potential  loss  arising  from fluctuations  in  market  rates  and  prices.  Our  market  risk  exposures  primarily
include fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.

Interest Rate Risk 

Historically,  fluctuations  in  interest  rates  have  not  had  a  significant  effect  on  our  operating  results.  Under  our  Credit 
Agreement,  outstanding  balances  bear  interest  at  our  election  of  (a) 1.50%  to  2.00%  above  a  certain  base  rate  (4.75%  at 
March 31, 2012), or (b) 2.50% to 3.00% above the LIBOR rate (approximately 2.74% at March 31, 2012), with the margin 
rate  subject  to  the  achievement  of  certain  average  liquidity  levels.  Changes  in  market  rates  may  affect  our  future  interest 
expense if there is an outstanding balance on our line of credit. The 1.75% Convertible Notes and the 4.375% Convertible 
Notes pay interest semi-annually at a fixed rate of 1.75% and 4.375%, respectively, per annum and we expect that there will 
be no fluctuation related to the Convertible Notes affecting our cash component of interest expense. For additional details on
our Convertible Notes see Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk 

We transact business in foreign currencies and are exposed to risks resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange 
rates. Accounts relating to foreign operations are translated into United States dollars using prevailing exchange rates at the
relevant period end. Translation adjustments are included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. For the fiscal year 
ended  March 31,  2012,  our  foreign  currency  translation  loss adjustment  was  approximately  $3.8 million.  We  recognized  a
foreign  currency  exchange  transaction  loss  for  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2012  and 2010  of  $1.3 million  and 
$0.6 million,  respectively,  and  a  foreign  currency  exchange  transaction  gain  in  inte
rest  and  other,  net  in  our  Consolidated 
uu
r
Statements of Operations for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 of $1.4 million.

t

Cash Flow Hedging Activities 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate foreign currency 
risk associated with forecasted non-functional currency denominated expenses. These transactions, which are designated and 
qualify  as  cash  flow  hedges,  are  accounted  for  as  derivatives  whereby  the  fair  value  of  the  contracts  is  reported  as  either 
assets or liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The effective portion of gains or losses resulting from changes in the
fair value of these hedges is initially reported, net of tax, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 
sulting from changes in the fair value
f
in stockholders’ equity. The gross amount of the effective portion of gains or losses re
of these hedges is subsequently reclassified into cost of goods sold or research and 
development expenses, as appropriate, in
d
the period when the forecasted transaction is recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. In the event that the 
gains  or  losses  in  accumulated  other  comprehensive  income  (loss)  are  deemed  to  be  ineffective,  the  ineffective  portion  of 
gains  or  losses  resulting  from  changes  in  fair  value,  if  any,  is  reclassified  to  interest  and  other,  net,  in  our  Consolidated 
Statements of Operations. In the event that the underlying forecasted transactions do not occur, or it becomes probable that 
they will not occur, within the defined hedge period, the gains or losses on the related cash flow hedges are reclassified from
accumulated  other  comprehensive  income  (loss)  to  interest  and  other,  net,  in  our  Consolidated  Statements  of  Operations. 
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, all forecasted transactions occurred, and therefore, there were no such gains or 
losses reclassified into interest and other, net. We do not enter into derivative financial contracts for speculative or trading
purposes.  As  of  March 31,  2012,  we  had  $10.2 million  of  forward  contracts  outstanding  to  buy  foreign  currencies  in
exchange for U.S. dollars all of which have maturities of less than one year. As of March 31, 2012, the fair value of these 
outstanding forward contracts was immaterial and is included in prepaid expenses and other. 

40 

Balance Sheet Hedging Activities 

We  use  foreign  currency  forward  contracts  to  mitigate  foreign  currency  risk  associated  with  non-functional  currency
denominated cash balances and inter-company funding loans, non-functional currency denominated accounts receivable and 
non-functional currency denominated accounts payable. These transactions are not designated as hedging instruments and are
accounted  for  as  derivatives  whereby  the  fair  value  of  the  contracts  is  reported  as  either  assets  or  liabilities  on  our 
Consolidated Balance Sheets, and gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value are reported in interest and other, 
net,  in  our  Consolidated  Statements  of  Operations.  We  do  not  enter  into  derivative  financial  contracts  for  speculative  or 
trading  purposes.  At  March 31,  2012,  we  had  $4.0 million  of  forward  contracts  outstanding  to  buy  foreign  currencies  in
exchange for U.S. dollars and $28.3 million of forward contracts outstanding to sell foreign currencies in exchange for U.S.
dollars  all  of  which  have  maturities  of  less than  one  year.  At  March 31,  2011,  we  had  $2.4 million  of  forward  contracts
outstanding to buy foreign currencies in exchange for U.S. dollars and $35.5 million of forward contracts outstanding to sell 
foreign currencies in exchange for U.S. dollars all of which have maturities of less than one year. For the fiscal year ended 
March 31, 2012, we recorded a gain of $0.7 million and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we recorded 
losses of $6.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively, related to foreign currency forward contracts in interest and other, net ont
the  Consolidated  Statements  of  Operations.  As  of  March 31,  2012  and 2011,  the  fair  value  of  these  outstanding  forward 
contracts was immaterial and is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities.

Our hedging programs are designed to reduce, but do not entirely eliminate, the effect of currency exchange rate movements. 
We believe the counterparties to these foreign currency forward contracts are creditworthy multinational commercial banks
and  that  the  risk  of  counterparty  nonperformance  is  not  material.  Notwithstanding  our  efforts  to  mitigate  some  foreign
currency exchange rate risks, there can be no assurance that our hedging activities will adequately protect us against the risks
associated with foreign currency fluctuations. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, 45.6% of the Company’s revenue
was  generated  outside  the  United  States.  Using  sensitivity  analysis,  a  hypothetical  10%  increase  in  the  value  of  the  U.S.
dollar against all currencies would decrease revenues by 4.6%, while a hypothetical 10% decrease in the value of the U.S.
dollar against all currencies would increase revenues by 4.6%. In the opinion of management, a substantial portion of this
fluctuation would be offset by cost of goods sold and operating expenses incurred in local currency.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The financial statements  and  supplementary  data  appear in  a  separate  section of  this  report following  Part IV. We provide
details  of  our  valuation  and  qualifying  accounts  in  “Note 18—Supplementary  Financial  Information”  to  the  Consolidated 
Financial Statements. All schedules have been omitted since the information required to be submitted has been included on
the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto or has been omitte

d as not applicable or not required.

a

r

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None. 

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures 

Definition and Limitations of Disclosure Controls and Procedures 

Our  disclosure  controls  and  procedures (as  defined  in  Rules 13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e)  under  the  Securities  Exchange  Act 
of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) are designed to reasonably ensure that information required to be disclosed in our 
reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in 
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission’s  rules  and  forms  and  (ii) accumulated  and  communicated  to  management, 
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosures.

There  are  inherent  limitations  to  the  effectiveness  of  any  system  of  disclosure  controls  and  procedures.  These  limitations
include  the  possibility  of  human  error,  the  circumvention  or  overriding  of  the  controls  and  procedures  and  reasonable
resource constraints. In addition, because we have designed our system of controls based on certain assumptions, which we 
believe  are  reasonable,  about  the  likelihood  of  future  events,  our  system  of  controls  may  not  achieve  its  desired  purpose 
under all possible future conditions. Accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance, but 
not absolute assurance, of achieving their objectives. 

41 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures 

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and princip
al financial officer, has evaluated the
f
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures at March 31, 2012, the end of the period covered by this report. Based 
on  this  evaluation,  the  principal  executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer  concluded  that,  at  March 31,  2012,  our 
disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance th
at information required to be disclosed 
ff
by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, and 
reported on a timely basis, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer 
and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control 
over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of 
Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway  Commission  (“COSO”). Based  on  this  evaluation,  management  has  concluded 
that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of March 31, 2012.

r

Our  independent  registered public  accounting  firm,  Ernst &  Young LLP,  has  issued  an  audit  report  on our  internal control
over financial reporting. The report on the audit of internal control over financial reporting is included in this Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2012, which 
were identified in connection with management’s evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the 
Exchange Act, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.

Item 9B.  Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Proposal 1—Election of 
Directors”  and  “Executive  Compensation—Section 16(a)  Beneficial  Ownership  Reporting  Compliance”  in  the  Company’s 
definitive  Proxy  Statement  (the “Proxy  Statement”)  for  the  Annual  Meeting  of  Stockholders  to  be  held  in 2012.  The
Company intends to file the Proxy Statement within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year (i.e. on or before July 30, 2012).
The Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to its directors and all employees, including senior financial 
officers, is available on the Company’s website at www.take2games.com. If the Company makes any amendment to its Code 
of Business Conduct and Ethics that is required to be disclosed pursuant to the Exchange Act, the Company will make such 
disclosures on its website. 

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Executive Compensation
and Related Information” in the Company’s Proxy Statement.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Voting Security Ownership 
of  Certain  Beneficial  Owners  and  Management”  and  “Equity  Compensation  Plan  Information”  in  the  Company’s  Proxy 
Statement. 

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Certain Relationships and 
Related Transactions” in the Company’s Proxy Statement.

Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Principal Accounting Fees 
and Services” in the Company’s Proxy Statement.

42 

PART IV 

Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) 

The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

(i) 

(ii) 

Financial Statements. See Index to Financial Statements on page 46 of this Report.

Financial Statement Schedule. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(iii) 

Index to Exhibits: 

Restated Certificate of Incorporation 

Exhibit Description

Incorporated by Reference

Form Filing Date
10-K

2/12/2004 

Exhibit

3.1

Filed 
Herewith

Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated 
April 30, 1998 

Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated 
November 17, 2003 

10-K

2/12/2004 

3.1.2

10-K

2/12/2004 

3.1.3

Certificate of Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated 
April 23, 2009. 

8-K

4/23/2009 

Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock, dated March 11, 1998 

10-K

2/12/2004 

Certificate of Designation of Series B Preferred Stock, dated March 24, 2008 

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company 

 Indenture, dated as of June 3, 2009, between the Company and The Bank of 
New York Mellon, as Trustee 

 Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 3, 2009, between the Company and 
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, to Indenture, dated as of June 3,
2009, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee,
relating to 4.375% Convertible Notes 

 Form of 4.375% Convertible Note (included in Exhibit 4.2) 

 Indenture, dated as of November 16, 2011, by and between the Company and 
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, relating to 1.75% Convertible Notes 

 Form of 1.75% Convertible Note (included in Exhibit 4.4) 
2002 Stock Option Plan+ 
Amendment to the 2002 Stock Option Plan+ 
Incentive Stock Plan+ 
Amendment to the Incentive Stock Plan+ 
Form of Stock Option Grant Letter+ 
Form of Restricted Stock Award Letter—Directors+ 
Form of Restricted Stock Award Letter—Employees+

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. Change in Control Employee Severance
Plan+ 
2009 Stock Incentive Plan+ 
Amendment No. 2 to the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan+ 
Form of Employee Restricted Stock Agreement+ 
Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Agreement+t

Employment Agreement dated February 28, 2007 between the Company and 
Seth Krauss+ 

8-K

8-K

3/26/2008 

2/24/2010 

8-K

6/4/2009 

8-K

8-K

6/4/2009 

6/4/2009 

8-K 11/18/2011 

8-K 11/18/2011 

10-Q

9/8/2005 

8-K

4/23/2009 

10-Q

9/8/2005 

8-K

4/23/2009 

10-K

1/31/2006 

10-K 12/20/2007 

10-K 12/20/2007 

8-K

8-K

8-K

10-Q

10-Q

3/7/2008 

4/23/2009 

9/27/2011 

6/5/2009 

6/5/2009 

8-K

3/6/2007 

 Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 25, 2008, by and between 
the Company and Seth Krauss+ 

8-K

3/26/2008 

 Employment Agreement between the Company and Lainie Goldstein dated 
July 16, 2007+ 

8-K

7/17/2007 

 Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 25, 2008, by and between 
the Company and Lainie Goldstein+ 

8-K

3/26/2008 

43 

3.1

3.1.1

3.2

3.1

4.1

4.2

4.2

4.1

4.1

10.2

10.2

10.1

10.3

10.15

10.23

10.24

10.1

10.1

10.1

10.2

10.3

10.1

10.2

10.1

10.1

Exhibit
Number
    3.1 

    3.1.1 

    3.1.2 

    3.1.3 

    3.2 

    3.3 

    3.4 

    4.1 

    4.2 

    4.3 

    4.4 

    4.5 

 10.1 

 10.2 

10.3 

10.4 

 10.5 

 10.6 

10.7 

10.8 

10.9 

 10.10 

 10.11 

10.12 

10.13 

 10.14 

 10.15 

10.16 

Exhibit
Number
 10.17 

 10.18 

 10.19 

10.20 

 10.21 

 10.22 

10.23 

10.24 

10.25 

10.26 

10.27 

10.28 

10.29 

10.30 

10.31 

 10.32 

 10.33 

 10.34 

 10.35 

 10.36 

 10.37 

 10.38 

 10.39 

Exhibit Description
 Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 16, 2009, by 
and between the Company and Lainie Goldstein+ 
 Employment Agreement, dated February 14, 2008, by and between the
Company and Benjamin Feder+

 Employment Agreement, dated February 14, 2008, by and between the
Company and Karl Slatoff+ff  

 Employment Agreement, dated March 16, 2009, between the Company and 
Manuel Sousa+ 

10-Q

6/5/2009 

Incorporated by Reference

Form Filing Date

Exhibit

Filed 
Herewith

10-K 12/18/2009 

10.41

 Management Agreement between the Company and ZelnickMedia Corporation 
dated March 30, 2007+ 

 Amendment dated July 26, 2007 to the Management Agreement dated 
March 30, 2007 between the Company and ZelnickMedia Corporation+ 

 Second Amendment, dated February 14, 2008, to the Management Agreement 
dated March 30, 2007 between the Company and ZelnickMedia Corporation+ 
 Management Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2011, by and between Take-Two
Interactive Software, Inc. and ZelnickMedia Corporation+ 

 Security Agreement dated as of July 3, 2007, made by each of the Grantors
listed on the signature pages thereof and Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. in its capacity 
as administrative agent for the Lender Group and the Bank Product Providers 

 Supplement to Security Agreement dated as of November 16, 2007, made by
each of the grantors listed on the signature pages thereof and Wells Fargo 
Foothill, Inc. in its capacity as administrative agent for the Lender Group and the 
Bank Product Providers 

8-K

2/15/2008 

8-K

2/15/2008 

8-K

4/4/2007 

8-K

7/27/2007 

8-K

2/15/2008 

8-K

5/24/2011 

10.2

10.3

10.4

99.1

99.1

10.1

10.1

8-K

7/9/2007 

10.2

8-K 11/20/2007 

99.2

 Warrant Transaction Confirmation, dated May 28, 2009, between the Company 
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as dealer 

8-K

6/3/2009 

 Warrant Transaction Confirmation, dated May 28, 2009, between the Company
and Barclays Bank PLC, as dealer 

8-K

6/3/2009 

10.5

10.6

 Convertible Note Hedge Transaction Confirmation, dated May 29, 2009, 
between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as 
dealer 

 Convertible Note Hedge Transaction Confirmation, dated May 29, 2009, 
between the Company and Barclays Bank PLC, as dealer 

 Warrant Transaction Confirmation, dated May 28, 2009, between the Company
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as dealer 

 Warrant Transaction Confirmation, dated May 28, 2009, between the Company
and Barclays Bank PLC, as dealer 

 Convertible Note Hedge Transaction Confirmation, dated May 29, 2009, 
between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as 
dealer 

 Convertible Note Hedge Transaction Confirmation, dated May 29, 2009, 
between the Company and Barclays Bank PLC, as dealer 

 Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2011,
by and among the Company, each of its Subsidiaries identified on the signature
pages thereto as Borrowers, each of its Subsidiaries identified on the signature 
pages thereto as Guarantors, the lender parties thereto, and Wells Fargo Capital
Finance, Inc., as administrative agent 

 Xbox 360 Publisher License Agreement dated November 17, 2006, between 
Microsoft Licensing, GP and the Company* 

 Amendment to Xbox 360 Publisher License Agreement, dated December 4, 
2008, between Microsoft Licensing, GP and the Company* 

 Amendment to the Xbox 360 Publisher License Agreement, dated 
November 22, 2011, between the Company and Microsoft Licensing, GP* 

 Confidential License Agreement for the Wii Console dated August 20, 2007,
between Nintendo of America Inc. and the Company* 

8-K

6/3/2009 

10.1

8-K

6/3/2009 

8-K

6/3/2009 

8-K

6/3/2009 

8-K

6/3/2009 

8-K

6/3/2009 

10.2

10.7

10.8

10.3

10.4

8-K 10/17/2011 

10.1

10-Q

11/8/2011 

10-Q

6/5/2009 

10-Q

2/3/2012 

10-Q

9/10/2007 

10.3

10.1

10.1

10.1

44 

Exhibit Description

Form Filing Date

Exhibit

Filed 
Herewith

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit
Number
 10.40 

 10.41 

 10.42 

 10.43 

 10.44 

 10.45 

 21.1 

 23.1 

 31.1 

 31.2 

 32.1 

 32.2 

10-Q

3/10/2010 

10.3

 First Amendment, effective August 21, 2009, to the Confidential License 
Agreement, effective February 21, 2007, by and among Nintendo of 
America Inc. and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. and certain of its affiliates
party thereto 

 Global Playstation 3 Format Licensed Publisher Agreement, dated May 18, 
2010, between Take-Two International S.A. and Sony Computer Entertainment 
Europe Limited* 

 Global Playstation 3 Format Licensed Publisher Agreement, dated May 20, 
2010, between the Company and Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC* 

10-Q

11/8/2011 

10-Q

11/8/2011 

10.2

10.1

 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated December 21, 2009, by and among SYNNEX 
Corporation, Jack of All Games, Inc., Jack of All Games (Canada), Inc., and 
solely for purposes of Section 9.2 therein, the Company 

8-K 12/21/2009 

10.1

 Lease Agreement between the Company and Moklam Enterprises, Inc. dated 
July 1, 2002 

10-Q

9/16/2002 

10.2

 Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated January 18, 2012, between the 
Company and Moklam Enterprises, Inc. 

 Subsidiaries of the Company 

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP 

 Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) 
under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to 
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

 Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) 
under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to 
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

 Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

 Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

101.INS  XBRL Instance Document. 

101.SCH  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. 

101.CAL  XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document. 

101.LAB  XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document. 

101.PRE  XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document. 

101.DEF  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document. 

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

+ 

* 

Represents a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Portions hereof have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a
request for confidential treatment that was granted in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 24b-2. 

Attached  as  Exhibit 101  to  this  report  are  the  following  formatted  in  XBRL  (Extensible Business  Reporting  Language):
(i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2012 and 2011, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years
ended  March 31,  2012,  2011  and 2010  (unaudited),  five  months ended  March 31,  2010  and  fiscal  year  ended  October 31, 
2009,  (iii) Consolidated  Statements  of  Cash  Flows  for  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31, 2012,  2011  and 2010  (unaudited),
five  months  ended  March 31, 2010  and  fiscal  year  ended  October 31, 2009,  (iv) Consolidated Statements  of  Stockholders’
Equity  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  October 31,  2009,  the  five  months  ended  March 31,  2010  and  the  fiscal  years  ended 
March 31, 2011 and 2012; and (v) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 

d

45 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. 
FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2012

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

Consolidated Balance Sheets—At March 31, 2012 and 2011 

Consolidated Statements of Operations—For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited), five 

months ended March 31, 2010 and fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited), five 

months ended March 31, 2010 and fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity—For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, the five months ended 

March 31, 2010 and the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

Page
47

49

50

51

52

53

(All other items in this report are inapplicable)

46 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. as of March 31, 2012 
and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years
ended  March 31,  2012  and 2011,  the  five  months  ended  March 31,  2010  and  for  the  year  ended  October 31,  2009.  These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these 
financial statements based on our audits.

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  the  standards  of  the  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United 
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant 
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

t

In  our  opinion,  the  financial  statements  referred  to  above present  fairly,  in  all  material  respects,  the  consolidated  financial
position of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. at March 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the five months ended March 31, 2010 and for the
year ended October 31, 2009 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Take-Two  Interactive  Software, Inc.’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  March 31,  2012,  based  on  criteria 
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated May 22, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York 

May 22, 2012

47 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

We have audited Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2012, based 
on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of 
the  Treadway  Commission  (the  COSO  criteria).  Take-Two  Interactive  Software, Inc.’s  management  is  responsible  for 
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over  financial  reporting  included  in  the  accompanying  Management’s  Annual  Report on  Internal  Control  Over  Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our 
audit. 

t

We  conducted  our  audit  in  accordance  with  the  standards  of  the  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United 
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective 
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  was  maintained  in  all  material  respects.  Our  audit  included  obtaining  an
understanding  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  assessing  the  risk  that  a  material  weakness  exists,  testing  and 
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other 
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our 
opinion. 

A  company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  is  a  process  designed  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that  (1) pertain  to  the  maintenance  of  records  that,  in  reasonable  detail,  accurately  and  fairly  reflect  the  transactions  and 
dispositions  of  the  assets  of  the  company; (2) provide  reasonable  assurance  that  transactions  are  recorded  as  necessary  to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and 
expenditures  of  the  company  are  being  made  only  in  accordance  with  authorizations  of  management  and  directors  of  the
aa
company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or 
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
s are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
f
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future period
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. 

In  our  opinion,  Take-Two  Interactive  Software, Inc.  maintained,  in  all  material  respects,  effective  internal  control  over 
financial reporting as of March 31, 2012, based on the COSO criteria. 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Take-Two  Interactive  Software, Inc.  as  of  March 31,  2012  and 2011,  and  the  related
consolidated  statements  of  operations,  stockholders’  equity,  and  cash  flows  for  each  of  the  years  ended  March 31,  2012 
and 2011,  the  five  months  ended  March 31,  2010,  and  for  the  year  ended  October 31,  2009  of  Take-Two  Interactive
Software, Inc. and our report dated May 22, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

New York, New York 

May 22, 2012 

48 

TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share amounts) 

Current assets: 

ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $51,002 and $42,900 at March 31, 2012 

$420,279

$280,359

March 31,
2012

March 31,
2011

and 2011, respectively

Inventory 
Software development costs and licenses
Prepaid taxes and taxes receivable 
Prepaid expenses and other 

Total current assets 

Fixed assets, net 
Software development costs and licenses, net of current portion 
Goodwill
Other intangibles, net 
Other assets

Total assets

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities: 

Accounts payable
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
Deferred revenue
Liabilities of discontinued operations 

Total current liabilities

Long-term debt 
Income taxes payable
Other long-term liabilities
Liabilities of discontinued operations, net of current portion

Total liabilities 

Commitments and contingencies 
Stockholders’ equity: 

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000 shares authorized 
Common stock, $.01 par value, 150,000 shares authorized; 90,215 and 86,119 shares

issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively

Additional paid-in capital 
Accumulated deficit 
Accumulated other comprehensive income 

Total stockholders’ equity 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity 

See accompanying Notes.

45,035
22,477
211,224
2,669
41,933
743,617
18,949
104,755
228,169
16,266
37,671
$1,149,427

$46,681
156,768
13,864
1,412
218,725
316,340
15,621
695
2,319
553,700

84,217
24,578
131,676
8,280
37,493
566,603
19,632
138,320
225,170
17,833
4,101
$971,659

$56,153
158,459
13,434
2,842
230,888
107,239
12,037
2,961
3,255
356,380

—

—

902
799,431
(211,339)
6,733
595,727
$1,149,427

861
706,482
(102,523)
10,459
615,279
$971,659

49 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts) 

Net revenue
Cost of goods sold 
Gross profit 

Selling and marketing 
General and administrative 
Research and development 
Depreciation and amortization 

Total operating expenses 
Income (loss) from operations 
Interest and other, net 
Income (loss) from continuing 

operations before income taxes 

Provision for income taxes 
Income (loss) from continuing

operations 

Loss from discontinued operations, 

net of taxes
Net income (loss) 
Earnings (loss) per share: 
Continuing operations 
Discontinued operations 
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations 
Discontinued operations 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2011

2012

$1,136,876
689,381
447,495
176,294
109,484
69,576
14,999
370,353
77,142
(13,519)

2010
(Unaudited)
$762,941
494,579
268,362
154,519
115,673
57,888
16,403
344,483
(76,121)
(18,794)

63,623
9,819

(94,915)
13,145

$825,823
528,855
296,968
183,749
121,200
64,162
12,123
381,234
(84,266)
(19,571)

(103,837)
3,863

Five Months 
Ended March 31, 
2010

Fiscal Year
Ended October 31,
2009

$359,231 
222,396 
136,835 
72,402 
43,466 
25,279 
6,622 
147,769 
(10,934) 
(11,352) 

(22,286)
4,266 

$701,057
467,576
233,481
141,962
130,376
63,748
17,574
353,660
(120,179)
(5,771)

(125,950)
4,487

(107,700)

53,804

(108,060)

(26,552)

(130,437)

(1,116)
$(108,816)

(5,346)
$48,458

(14,935)
$(122,995)

(2,250) 
$(28,802) 

(10,017)
$(140,454)

$(1.30)
(0.01)
$(1.31)
$(1.30)
(0.01)
$(1.31)

$0.62
(0.06)
$0.56
$0.62
(0.06)
$0.56

$(1.39)
(0.19)
$(1.58)
$(1.39)
(0.19)
$(1.58)

$(0.34) 
(0.03) 
$(0.37) 
$(0.34) 
(0.03) 
$(0.37) 

$(1.70)
(0.13)
$(1.83)
$(1.70)
(0.13)
$(1.83)

50 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 
2011 

2012 

2010 
(Unaudited)   

Five Months
Ended March 31, 
2010 

Fiscal Year 
Ended October 31,
2009 

Operating activities:
Net income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided 

by operating activities: 
Amortization and impairment of software development costs and 

licenses

Depreciation and amortization 
Loss from discontinued operations
Amortization and impairment of intellectual property
Stock-based compensation
Gain on sale of intellectual property
Loss on sale of subsidiary
Deferred income taxes 
Amortization of discount on Convertible Notes
Amortization of debt issuance costs 
Other, net 

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect from purchases of 

businesses: 
Accounts receivable 
Inventory 
Software development costs and licenses 
Prepaid expenses, other current and other non-current assets
Deferred revenue
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, income taxes payable and 

other liabilities

Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities 

Investing activities:

Purchase of fixed assets 
Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations
Cash received from sale of intellectual property
Cash received from sale of business
Payments in connection with business combinations,  

net of cash acquired 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities 

Financing activities:

Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options
Net payments on line of credit 
Proceeds from issuance of Convertible Notes
Purchase of convertible note hedges 
Issuance of warrants to purchase common stock 
Payment of debt issuance costs
Net cash provided by financing activities 
Effects of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and  

cash equivalents

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period 

Supplemental data:
Interest paid 
Income taxes paid (received) 

See accompanying Notes. 

$(108,816)

$48,458

$(122,995)   

$(28,802) 

$(140,454)

150,700
12,123
1,116
983
33,494
(2,200)
—
1,878
11,728
1,527
1,231

143,811
14,999
5,346
3,927
28,765
—
—
(1,095)
7,374
1,251
(1,097)

112,742
16,403   
14,935   
109   
26,503   
—   
3,831   
4,550   
5,457   
1,136   
788   

39,182
2,101
(191,223)
2,537
430

(10,082)
(99)
(156,782)
16,943
1,490

(3,332)   
5,581   
(171,855)   
(14,091)   
(12,371)   

(39,748)
(2,007)
(84,964)

(10,786)
(1,475)
2,200
—

(4,101)
(14,162)

239
—
250,000
—
—
(6,875)
243,364

41,217
(9,628)
134,798

(5,314)

2,221   
(135,702)   

(9,653)
—
—
3,075

(1,000)
(7,578)

734
—
—
—
—
—
734

(9,933)   
37,250   

—
2,512   

(6,804) 
23,025   

18   
(70,000)   
138,000   
(43,592)   
26,342   
(4,984)   
45,784   

50,956 
6,622 
2,250 
40 
10,479 
— 
3,831 
761 
2,802 
521 
1,086 

106,930 
1,893 
(61,563) 
(6,420) 
5,610 

(95,604) 
5,187 
6,579 

(3,149) 
37,250 
—
2,512 

(991) 
35,622 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

(4,318)
139,920
280,359
$420,279

6,567
134,521
145,838
$280,359

8,593 
(58,300)   
204,138   
$145,838   

1,554 
43,755 
102,083 
$145,838 

$6,992
$1,018

$7,361
$6,336

$5,196   
$1,673   

$3,680 
$10,519 

105,521
17,574
10,017
478
25,933
—
—
3,432
2,655
852
(4,456)

(57,275)
11,792
(164,828)
(309)
(49,829)

13,728
14,965
(210,204)

(11,176)
—
—
—

(5,813)
(16,989)

22
(70,000)
138,000
(43,592)
26,342
(4,984)
45,788

3,211
(178,194)
280,277
$102,083

$4,371
$(5,423)

51 

 
 
 
 
TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands)

Balance, October 31, 2008
Net loss
Change in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 
Purchase of call options 
Sale of warrants 
Stock-based compensation 
Issuance of 4.375% Convertible Notes 
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures and cancellations 
Income tax effect of stock award cancellations and forfeitures
Balance, October 31, 2009
Net loss
Change in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment 
Stock-based compensation 
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures and cancellations 
Income tax effect of stock award cancellations and forfeitures
Balance, March 31, 2010
Net income
Change in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 
Stock-based compensation 
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures and cancellations 
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition
Balance, March 31, 2011
Net loss
Change in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 
Change in unrealized gains on derivative instruments, net 
Stock-based compensation 
Issuance of 1.75% Convertible Notes 
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures and cancellations 
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition
Balance, March 31, 2012

See accompanying Notes. 

Common Stock
Shares Amount
777
77,694

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

603,579

—
2
—
—
—

4,229
—
81,925

—
—
2,052
—
83,977

—
65
—
1,884
193
86,119

—
21
—
—
—
3,947
128
90,215

—
—
—
—
—

42
—
819

—
—
21
—
840

—
1
—
18
2
861

—
1
—
—
—
39
1
$902

—
22
(43,592)
26,342
31,193
42,018
(42)
(726)
658,794

—
12,930
(21)
2,774
674,477

—
732
29,293
(18)
1,998
706,482

—
238
—
39,571
51,180
(39)
1,999
$799,431

Retained 
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)

18,275
(140,454) 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
—
(122,179)
(28,802) 
— 
— 
— 
—
(150,981)
48,458 
— 
— 
— 
— 
—
(102,523)
(108,816) 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
—
$(211,339)

Accumulated
Other 
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)

(7,513)

15,705
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
8,192

(11,905)
—
—
—
(3,713)

14,172
—
—
—
—
10,459

(3,785)
—
59
—
—
—
—
$6,733

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

615,118
(140,454)
15,705
22
(43,592)
26,342
31,193
42,018
—
(726)
545,626
(28,802)
(11,905)
12,930
—
2,774
520,623
48,458
14,172
733
29,293
—
2,000
615,279
(108,816)
(3,785)
239
59
39,571
51,180
—
2,000
$595,727

52 

TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts) 

1. 

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 

Take-Two  Interactive  Software, Inc.  (the  “Company,”  “we,”  “us,”  or  similar  pronouns)  was  incorporated  in  the  state  of 
Delaware in 1993. We are a leading developer, marketer and publisher of interactive entertainment for consumers around the
globe. The Company develops and publishes products through its two wholly-owned labels Rockstar Games and 2K, which 
publishes  its  titles  under  the  2K Games,  2K Sports  and  2K Play  brands.  Our  products  are  designed  for  console  systems, 
handheld  gaming  systems  and  personal  computers,  including  smart  phones  and  tablets,  and  are  delivered  through  physical
retail, digital download, online platforms and cloud streaming services. 

Principles of Consolidation 

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. 
All material inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Change in Fiscal Year 

On  October 25,  2010,  the  Company’s  Board  of  Directors  approved  a  change  in  the  Company’s  fiscal  year  end  from
October 31  to  March 31.  A  Transition  Report  on  Form 10-KT was  filed  for  the  period  from,  and  including  the  financial 
information for, the five-month period from November 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. For comparative purposes, an unaudited 
Consolidated  Statement  of  Operations  and  Consolidated  Statement  of  Cash  Flows  have  been  included  for  the  fiscal  year 
ended  March 31, 2010.  The  reported numbers  for  the fiscal  year  ended March 31, 2010,  which  have  not  been  audited,  are
derived from the books and records of the Company and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments necessary to
present the financial position and results of operations in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. 

Reclassifications

Certain  amounts  in  the  financial  statements  of  the  prior  years  have  been  reclassified  to  conform  to  the  current  year 
presentation for comparative purposes. 

Discontinued Operations

In  February 2010,  we  completed  the  sale  to  SYNNEX  Corporation  (“Synnex”)  of  our  Jack  of  All  Games  third-party 
distribution business, which primarily distributed third-party interactive entertainment software, hardware and accessories in
North  America.  The  financial  results  of  our  distribution  business  have  been  classified  as  discontinued  operations  in  the 
Consolidated Statements of Operations for all of the periods presented. The assets and liabilities of this business are reflected
as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented. See Note 2
for  additional  information  regarding  discontinued  operations.  Unless  otherwise  noted,  amounts  and  disclosures  throughout 
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements relate to the Company’s continuing operations. 

Use of Estimates 

The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  U.S.  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of 
contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses
e  to  the  recoverability  of  software 
during  the  reporting  periods.  The  most significant  estimates  and  assumptions  relat
development costs, licenses and intangibles, valuation of inventories, realization of deferred income taxes, the adequacy of 
allowances for sales returns, price concessions and doubtful accounts, accrued liabilities, the service period for deferred net
revenue, fair value estimates, the valuation of stock-based compensation and assumptions used in our goodwill impairment
test. These estimates generally involve complex issues and require us to make judgments, involve analysis of historical and 
m
the  prediction  of  future  trends,  and  are  subject  to  change  from  period  to  period.  Actual  amounts  could  differ  significantly
from these estimates. 

t

53 

Financial Instruments

The  carrying  amounts  of  our  financial  instruments,  including  cash  and  cash  equivalents,  accounts  receivable,  accounts 
payable  and  accrued  liabilities,  approximate  fair  value  because  of  their  short  maturities.  We  consider  all  highly  liquid 
instruments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At March 31, 2012 and 2011
we had $16,464 and $20,091, respectively, of cash on deposit reported as a component of prepaid expenses and other in the 
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets because its use was restricted.

As of March 31, 2012, the estimated fair value of the Company’s 4.375% Conver
tible Notes due 2014 and the Company’s
r
1.75%  Convertible  Notes  due 2016  was $213,265  and  $263,600,  respectively.  See  Note 12  for  additional  information 
d
regarding our Convertible Notes. The fair value was determined using observable market data for the Convertible Notes and 
its embedded option feature. 

We  transact  business  in  various  foreign  currencies  and  have  significant  sales  and  purchase  transactions  denominated  in
foreign currencies, subjecting us to foreign currency exchange rate risk. From time to time, we use hedging programs in an 
effort to mitigate the effect of currency exchange rate movements.

Cash Flow Hedging Activities

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate foreign currency 
exchange rate risk associated with forecasted non-functional currency denominated expenses. These transactions, which are 
designated  and  qualify  as  cash  flow  hedges,  are  accounted  for  as  derivatives  whereby  the  fair  value  of  the  contracts  is 
reported as either assets or liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The effective portion of gains or losses resulting
from  changes  in  the  fair  value  of  these  hedges  is  initially  reported,  net  of  tax,  as  a  component  of  accumulated  other 
comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. The gross amount of the effective portion of gains or losses resulting 
from  changes  in  the  fair  value  of  these  hedges  is  subsequently reclassified  into  cost  of  goods  sold  or  research  and 
development  expenses,  as  appropriate,  in  the  period  when the  forecasted  transaction  is  recognized  in  our  Consolidated 
Statements of Operations. In the event that the gains or losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are deemed
to  be  ineffective,  the  ineffective  portion  of  gains  or  losses  resulting  from  changes  in  fair  value,  if  any,  is  reclassified  to 
interest and other, net, in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. In the event that the underlying forecasted transactions
do  not  occur,  or  it  becomes  probable  that  they  will  not  occur,  within  the  defined  hedge  period,  the  gains  or  losses  on  the 
related cash flow hedges are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to interest and other, net, in 
our  Consolidated  Statements  of  Operations.  During  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2012,  all  forecasted  transactions 
occurred,  and  therefore,  there  were  no  such  gains  or  losses  reclassified  into  interest  and  other,  net.  We  do  not  enter  into
derivative financial contracts for speculative or trading purposes. As of March 31, 2012, we had $10,192 of forward contracts 
outstanding to buy foreign currencies in exchange for U.S. dollars all of which have maturities of less than one year. As of 
March 31, 2012, the fair value of these outstanding forward contracts was immaterial and is included in prepaid expenses and 
other. 

Balance Sheet Hedging Activities

We  use  foreign  currency  forward  contracts  to  mitigate  foreign  currency  exchange  rate  risk  associated  with  non-functional
currency  denominated  cash  balances  and  inter-  company  funding  loans,  non-functional  currency  denominated  accounts
receivable  and  non-functional  currency  denominated  accounts  payable.  These  transactions  are  not  designated  as  hedging
instruments  and  are  accounted  for  as  derivatives  whereby  the  fair  value  of  the  contracts  is  reported  as  either  assets  or 
liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value are reported in 
interest and other, net, in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. We do not enter into derivative financial contracts for 
speculative  or  trading  purposes.  At  March 31,  2012,  we  had  $4,005  of  forward  contracts  outstanding  to  buy  foreign
currencies in exchange for U.S. dollars and $28,304 of forward contracts outstanding to sell foreign currencies in exchange
for U.S. dollars all of which have maturities of less than one year. At March 31, 2011, we had $2,399 of forward contracts
outstanding  to  buy  foreign  currencies  in  exchange  for  U.S.  dollars  and  $35,539  of  forward  contracts  outstanding  to  sell 
foreign currencies in exchange for U.S. dollars all of which have maturities of less than one year. For the fiscal year ended 
March 31,  2012,  we  recorded  a  gain  of  $746  and  for  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2011  and 2010,  five  months  ended 
March 31, 2010 and fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, we recorded losses of $6,901, $953, $2,300 and $73, respectively,
related to foreign currency forward contracts in interest and other, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of 
March 31, 2012 and 2011, the fair value of these outstanding forward contracts was immaterial and is included in accrued 
expenses and other current liabilities.

r

54 

Concentration of Credit Risk and Accounts Receivable 

We maintain cash balances at several major financial institutions. While we attempt to limit credit exposure with any single 
institution, balances often exceed insurable amounts. 

If the financial condition and operations of our customers deteriorate, our risk of collection could increase substantially. A 
majority  of  our  trade  receivables  are  derived  from  sales  to  major  retailers  and  distributors.  Our  five  largest  customers 
accounted for 43.9%, 43.8%, 59.8%, 55.7%, and 56.4% of net revenue during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012, 2011 
and 2010, five  months  ended  March 31,  2010  and fiscal year  ended October 31, 2009,  respectively. As of  March 31, 2012 
and 2011,  the  five  largest  customers  accounted  for  61.3%  and  54.2%  of  our  gross  accounts  receivable,  respectively.
Customers  that  individually  accounted  for  more  than  10%  of  our  gross  accounts  receivable  balance  comprised  40.6%  and 
38.2% of such balances at March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We believe that the receivable balances from these largest 
customers do not represent a significant credit risk based on past collection experience.

t

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of average cost or market. Estimated product returns are included in the inventory balance at 
their cost. We regularly review inventory quantities on-hand and in the retail channe
ls and record an inventory provision for 
excess or obsolete inventory based on the future expected demand for our products. Significant changes in demand for our 
products would affect management’s estimates in establishing our inventory provision.

rr

Software Development Costs and Licenses 

Capitalized  software  development  costs  include  direct  costs  incurred  for  internally  developed  titles  and  payments  made  to 
third-party software developers under development agreements. 

We capitalize internal software development costs (including stock-based compensation, specifically identifiable employee 
payroll expense and incentive compensation costs related to the completion and release of titles), third-party production and 
other  content  costs,  subsequent  to  establishing  technological  feasibility of  a  software  title.  Technological  feasibility  of  a
product includes the completion of both technical design and game design documentation.

We enter into agreements with third-party developers that require us to make payments for game development and production
services. In exchange for our payments, we receive the exclusive publishing and distribution rights to the finished game title
as  well  as,  in  some  cases,  the  underlying  intellectual  property rights.  Such  agreements  allow  us  to  fully  recover  these
payments to the developers at an agreed upon royalty rate earned on the subsequent retail sales of such software, net of any 
agreed  upon  costs.  Prior  to establishing  technological  feasibility of  a  product  we  record  any  costs  incurred  by  third-  party 
developers  as  research  and  development  expenses. Subsequent  to  establishing  technological  feasibility  of  a  product  we 
capitalize  all  development  and  production  service  payments  to  third-party  developers  as  software  development  costs  and 
licenses. We typically enter into agreements with third-party developers after completing the technical design documentation
for  our  products  and  therefore  record  the  design  costs  leading  up  to  a  signed development  contract  as  research  and 
development expense. When we contract with third-party developers, we generally select those that have proven technology 
and  experience  in  the  genre  of  the  software  being  developed,  which  often allows  for  the  establishment  of  technological
feasibility early in the development cycle. In instances where the documentation of the design and technology are not in place
prior to an executed contract, we monitor the software development process and require our third-party developers to adhere 
to the same technological feasibility standards that apply to our internally developed products. 

d

Licenses  consist  of  payments  and  guarantees  made  to  holders of  intellectual  property  rights  for  use  of  their  trademarks, 
copyrights or other intellectual property rights in the development of our products. Agreements with license holders generally
provide for guaranteed minimum royalty payments for use of their intellectual property. Guaranteed minimum payments are 
initially recorded as an asset (licenses) and as a liability (accrued licenses) upon execution of a licensing agreement, provided
that  no  significant  performance  remains  to  be  completed  by  the licensor.  When  significant  performance  remains  to  be
completed by the licensor, we record payments when actually paid.

d

y

Certain licenses, especially those related to our sports products, extend over multi-year periods and encompass multiple game
titles. In addition to guaranteed minimum payments, these licenses frequently contain provisions that could require us to pay 
royalties to the license holder based on pre-agreed unit sales thresholds.

n

r

55 

Amortization of capitalized software development costs and licenses commences when a product is released and is recorded 
on  a  title-by-title  basis  in  cost  of  goods sold.  For  capitalized software  development  costs,  amortization  is  calculated  using 
(1) the proportion of current year revenues to the total revenues expected to be recorded over the life of the title or (2) the
straight-line  method  over  the  remaining  estimated  useful  life  of  the  title,  whichever  is  greater.  For  capitalized  licenses,
amortization  is  calculated  as  a  ratio  of  (1) current  period  revenues  to  the  total  revenues  expected  to  be  recorded  over  the 
remaining  life  of  the  title  or  (2) the  contractual  royalty  rate  based  on  actual  net  product  sales  as  defined  in  the  licensing
agreement, whichever is greater.

r

At  each  balance  sheet  date,  or  earlier  if  an  indicator  of  impairment  exists,  we  evaluate  the  recoverability  of  capitalized 
software costs, licenses and any other unrecognized minimum commitments that have not been paid, using an undiscounted 
future cash flow analysis. We use various measures to evaluate expected product performance and estimate future revenues
for  our  software  titles  including  historical  performance  of  comparable  titles;  orders  for  titles  prior  to  release;  and  the
estimated performance of a sequel title based on the performance of the title on which the sequel is based. When management 
determines that the value of a title is unlikely to be recovered by product sales, capitalized costs are charged to cost of goods
sold in the period in which such determination is made.

f

We have established profit and unit sales based internal royalty programs that allow selected employees to each participate in
the success of software titles that they assist in developing. Royalties earned by employees under this program are recorded 
as a component of cost of goods sold as they are incurred.

Fixed Assets, net 

Office equipment, furniture and fixtures are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful life of fiv
e
years. Computer equipment and software are generally depreciated using the straight-line method over three years. Leasehold 
improvements  are  amortized  over  the  lesser  of  the  term  of  the  related  lease  or 
seven  years.  The  cost  of  additions  and 
betterments  are  capitalized,  and  repairs  and  maintenance  costs  are  charged  to  operations,  in  the  periods  incurred.  When
depreciable assets are retired or sold, the cost and related allowances for depreciation are removed from the accounts and the
gain or loss is recognized. The carrying amounts of these assets are recorded at historical cost.

r

t

t

Goodwill and Intangible Assets 

Goodwill  is  the  excess  of  purchase  price  paid  over  identified  intangible  and  tangible  net  assets  of  acquired  companies.
Intangible  assets  consist  of  trademarks,  intellectual  property,  non-compete  agreements,  customer  lists  and  acquired 
technology. Certain intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recognized as assets apart from goodwill. 

We use either the income, cost or market approach to aid in our conclusions of such fair values and asset lives. The income 
approach presumes that the value of an asset can be estimated by the net economic benefit to be received over the life of the
asset,  discounted  to  present  value.  The  cost  approach  presumes  that  an  investor  would  pay  no  more  for  an  asset  than  its 
replacement or reproduction cost. The market approach estimates value based on what other participants in the market have
paid  for  reasonably  similar  assets.  Although  each  valuation  approach  is  considered  in  valuing  the  assets  acquired,  the
approach ultimately selected is based on the characteristics of the asset 

and the availability of information.

n

aa

Identified intangibles other than goodwill are generally amortized using the straight-line method over the period of expected 
benefit  ranging  from  three  to  ten  years,  except  for  intellectual  property,  which  is  a  usage-based  intangible  asset  that  is
amortized using the shorter of the useful life or expected revenue stream.

f

We  perform  an  annual  test  for  impairment  of goodwill  as  of  the  beginning  of  August
,  or  whenever  events  or  changes  in
circumstances  indicate  the  fair  value  of  a  reporting  unit  is  below  its  carrying  amount.  In  the  evaluation  of  goodwill  for 
impairment, we first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the
reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. If it is determined through the qualitative assessment that a reporting unit’s
fair value is more likely than not greater than its carrying value, the remaining impairment steps would be unnecessary. If 
however it is determined through the qualitative assessment that a reporting unit’s fair value is more likely than not less tha
n
its carrying value, we perform a quantitative assessment and compare the fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying value.

ff

In performing the quantitative assessment we measure the fair value of the reporting unit using a combination of the income
approach,  which  uses  discounted  cash  flows,  and  the  market  approach,  which  uses  market  capitalization  and  comparable 
companies’  data.  Each  step  requires  us  to  make  judgments  and  involves  the  use  of  significant  estimates  and  assumptions.
These  estimates  and  assumptions  include  long-term  growth  rates  and  operating  margins  used  to  calculate  projected  future 
cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates based on our weighted average cost of capital, future economic and market conditions 

56 

and  the  determination  of  appropriate  market  comparables.  These  estimates  and  assumptions  have  to  be  made  for  each 
reporting  unit  evaluated  for  impairment.  Our  estimates  for  market  growth  are  based  on  historical  data,  various  internal
estimates and observable external sources when available, and are based on assumptions that are consistent with the plans
and estimates we use to manage the underlying business. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the
goodwill of that reporting unit is potentially impaired and we proceed to step two of 
the impairment analysis. In step two of 
the analysis, we will record an impairment loss equal to the excess of the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill over
its implied fair value should such a circumstance arise. 

mm

Long-lived Assets 

cate that the carrying amount of an asset 
r
We review all long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indi
may  not  be  recoverable.  We  compare  the  carrying  amount  of  the  asset  to  the  estimated  undiscounted  future  cash  flows 
expected  to  result  from  the  use  of  the  asset.  If  the  carrying  amount  of  the  asset  exceeds  estimated  expected  undiscounted 
future cash flows, we record an impairment charge for the difference between the carrying amount of the asset and its fair 
value.  The  estimated  fair  value  is  generally  measured  by  discounting  expected  future  cash  flows  using  our  incremental 
borrowing rate or fair value, if available. 

Income Taxes

We record a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported results of operations. Our provision for income 
taxes  is  computed  using  the  asset  and  liability  method,  under  which  deferred  income  taxes  are  recognized  for  differences 
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities at currently enacted statutory tax rates for the years in
which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in
the period that includes the enactment. Valuation allowances are established when we determine that it is more likely than not 
that such deferred tax assets will not be realized. We do not record income tax expense related to foreign withholding taxes or
United  States  income  taxes  which  may  become  payable  upon  the  repatriation  of  undistr
ibuted  earnings  of  foreign
uu
subsidiaries, as such earnings are expected to be reinvested indefinitely outside of the United States. 

We use estimates and assumptions to compute the provision for income taxes including allocations of certain transactions to
different  tax  jurisdictions,  amounts  of  permanent  and  temporary  differences,  the  likelihood  of  deferred  tax  assets  being
recovered and the outcome of contingent tax risks. These estimates and assumptions are revised as new events occur, more 
experience is acquired and additional information is obtained. The effect of these revisions is recorded in income tax expense
or benefit in the period in which they become known. 

We recognize and measure uncertain tax positions and record tax benefits when it is more likely than not that the tax position
will  be  sustained  on  examination  by  the taxing  authorities,  based  on  the  technical  merits  of  the  position.  The  tax  benefits 
recognized in the financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater 
than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. 

Revenue Recognition

We earn our revenue from the sale of internally developed interactive software titles and from the sale of titles developed by 
and/or licensed from third- party developers. 

We recognize revenue upon the transfer of title and risk of loss to our customers. We recognize revenue for software titles
when there is (1) persuasive evidence that an arrangement with the customer exists, which is generally based on a customer
purchase order, (2) the product is delivered, (3) the selling price is fixed or determinable and (4) collection of the customer
receivable is deemed probable. Certain products are sold to customers with a street date (i.e., the earliest date these products 
may be sold by retailers). For these products we recognize revenue on the later of the street date or the sale date.

Our payment arrangements with customers typically provide net 30 and 60 day terms. Advances received for licensing and
exclusivity arrangements are reported on the balance sheet as deferred revenue
until we meet our performance obligations, at 
n
which point we recognize the revenue. 

Some  of  our  software  products  provide limited  online  functionality  at  no  additional cost  to  the  consumer.  Generally,  we
consider such features to be incidental to the overall product offering and an inconsequential deliverable. Accordingly, we do
not defer revenue related to products containing such online features. We determine whether our products contain substantial 
online functionality by evaluating the significance of the development effort and the nature of the online features, the extent
of  anticipated  marketing  focus  on  the  online  features,  the  significance  of  the  online  features  to  the  customers’  anticipated
overall gameplay experience, and the significance of our post sale obligations to customers. Overall, online play functionality
is still an emerging area for us, and we continue to monitor this developing functionality and its significance to our products.

57 

In addition, some of our software products are sold exclusively as downloads of digital content for which the consumer takes 
possession of the digital content for a fee. Revenue from product downloads is generally recognized when the download is
made available (assuming all other recognition criteria are met).

Certain of our software products include in-game advertising for third- party products. Advance payments received for in-
game  advertising  are  reported  on our  Consolidated  Balance  Sheets  as  deferred  revenue  until  we  meet  our  performance
obligations, at which point we recognize the revenue, which is generally at the time of the initial release of the product.

f

Revenue  is  recognized  after  deducting  estimated  reserves  for  returns,  price  concessions  and  other  allowances.  In 
circumstances when we do not have a reliable basis to estimate returns and price concessions or are unable to determine that 
collection of a receivable is probable, we defer the revenue until such time as we can reliably estimate any related returns and
allowances and determine that collection of the receivable is probable. 

Allowances for Returns, Price Concessions and Other Allowances 

We accept returns and grant price concessions in connection with our publishing arrangements. Following reductions in the 
price  of  our  products,  we  grant  price  concessions  to  permit  customers  to  take  credits  against  amounts  they  owe  us  with 
respect to merchandise unsold by them. Our customers must satisfy certain conditions to entitle them to return products or 
receive price concessions, including compliance with applicable payment terms and confirmation of field inventory levels.

Generally, our distribution arrangements with customers do not give them the right to return titles or to cancel firm orders. 
However, we occasionally accept returns from our customers for stock balancing and make accommodations to customers, 
which include credits and returns, when demand for specific titles falls below expectations. 

We make estimates of future product returns and price concessions related to current period product revenue. We estimate the
amount of future returns and price concessions for published titles based upon, among other factors, historical experience and 
performance  of  the  titles  in  similar  genres,  historical  performance  of  the  hardware  platform,  customer  inventory  levels, 
analysis of sell-through rates, sales force and retail customer feedback, industry pricing, market conditions and changes in
demand and acceptance of our products by consumers. 

Significant management judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with establishing the allowance for 
returns  and  price  concessions  in  any  accounting  period.  We  believe  we  can  make  reliable  estimates  of  returns  and  price
concessions.  However,  actual  results  may  differ  from  initial  estimates  as  a  result  of  changes  in  circumstances,  market 
conditions and assumptions. Adjustments to estimates are recorded in 

the period in which they become known. 

h

d

Consideration Given to Customers and Received from Vendors 

We  have  various  marketing  arrangements  with  retailers  and  distributors  of  our  products  that  provide  for  cooperative
advertising and market development funds, among others, which are generally based on single exchange transactions. Such 
amounts are accrued as a reduction to revenue at the later of: (1) the date at which the related revenue is recognized by us, or
ich  is  included  in  selling  and 
(2) the  date  at  which  the  sales incentive  is  offered,  except for  cooperative  advertising  wh
marketing expense if there is a separate identifiable benefit and the benefit’s fair value can be established.

t

We  receive  various  incentives  from  our  manufacturers,  including  up-front  cash  payments  as  well  as  rebates  based  on  a 
cumulative level of purchases. Such amounts are generally accounted for as a reduction in the price of the manufacturer’s
product and included as a reduction of inventory or cost of goods sold, based on (1) a ratio of current period revenue to the 
total revenue expected to be recorded over the remaining life of the product or (2) an agreed upon per unit rebate, based on 
actual units manufactured during the period.

Advertising

We  expense  advertising  costs  as  incurred. Advertising  expense for  the fiscal  years  ended  March 31, 2012, 2011  and 2010,
five  months  ended  March 31,  2010  and  fiscal  year  ended  October 31,  2009  amounted  to $122,932,  $115,089,  $103,718,
$51,481, and $93,390, respectively.

58 

Earnings (Loss) per Share (“EPS”) 

Basic EPS is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted 
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the same period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing the net 
income (loss) applicable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock 
and common stock equivalents outstanding. 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted EPS (shares in thousands):

f

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2011

2012

2010
(Unaudited)

Five Months 
Ended March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year
Ended October 31,
2009

Computation of Basic EPS:

Net income (loss)
Less: net income allocated to participating

securities
Net income (loss) for basic EPS  

calculation

Total weighted average shares  

outstanding—basic 

Less: weighted average participating

shares outstanding
Weighted average common shares

outstanding—basic 

Basic EPS 

Computation of Diluted EPS:

Net income (loss) 
Less: net income allocated to participating 

securities
Net income (loss) for diluted EPS 

calculation

Weighted average common shares

outstanding—basic 

Add: dilutive effect of common stock 

equivalents 
Weighted average common shares

outstanding—diluted 

Diluted EPS

$(108,816)

$48,458

$(122,995)

$(28,802)   

$(140,454)

— (3,159)

—

—   

—

$(108,816)

$45,299

$(122,995)

$(28,802)   

$(140,454)

83,356

86,127

77,858

78,453   

76,815

— (5,615)

—

—   

—

83,356
$(1.31)

80,512
$0.56

77,858
$(1.58)

78,453   
$(0.37)   

76,815
$(1.83)

$(108,816)

$48,458

$(122,995)

$(28,802)   

$(140,454)

— (3,159)

—

—   

—

$(108,816)

$45,299

$(122,995)

$(28,802)   

$(140,454)

83,356

80,512

77,858

78,453   

76,815

—

12

—

—   

—

83,356
$(1.31)

80,524
$0.56

77,858
$(1.58)

78,453   
$(0.37)   

76,815
$(1.83)

The Company incurred a net loss for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012 and 2010, five months ended March 31, 2010 and 
fiscal year ended October 31, 2009; therefore, the basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding exclude the effect of 
unvested share-based awards that are considered participating restricted stock and all common stock equivalents because their 
effect would be antidilutive.

Our unvested restricted stock rights (including restricted stock units, time-based and market-based restricted stock awards) 
ts  to  dividends  or  dividend 
u
are  considered  participating  restricted  stock  since  these  securities  have  non-forfeitable  righ
equivalents  during  the  contractual  period  of  the  award,  and  thus  require  the  two-class  method  of  computing  EPS.  The
calculation of EPS for common stock shown above excludes the income attributable to the unvested restricted stock rights 
from  the  numerator  and  excludes  the  dilutive  effect  of  those  awards  from  the  denominator.  For  the  fiscal  year  ended 
March 31,  2012,  fiscal  year  and  five  months  ended  March 31,  2010  and  fiscal year  ended  October 31,  2009,  we  had 
5,724,000, 6,261,000 and 5,320,000, respectively, of unvested share-based awards that are considered participating restricted 
stock which are excluded due to the net loss for those periods. 

d

59 

The  Company  defines  common  stock  equivalents  as  unexercised  stock  options,  common  stock  equivalents  underlying  the 
Convertible Notes (see Note 12) and warrants outstanding during the period. Common stock equivalents are measured using 
the treasury stock method, except for the Convertible Notes, which are assessed for their effect on diluted EPS using the more 
dilutive  of  the  treasury  stock  method  or  the  if-converted  method.  Under  the  provisions  of  the  if-converted  method,  the
Convertible  Notes  are  assumed  to  be  converted  and  included  in  the  denominator  of  the  EPS  calculation  and  the  interest 
expense, net of tax, recorded in connection with the Convertible Notes is added back to the numerator.

uu

u

In  connection  with  the  issuance  of  our  4.375%  Convertible  Notes
in  June 2009,  the  Company purchased  convertible  note 
hedges  (see  Note 12)  which  were  excluded  from  the  calculation  of  diluted  EPS  because  their  effect  is  always  considered 
antidilutive since the call option would be exercised by the Company when the exercise price is lower than the market price.
Also in connection with the issuance of our 4.375% Convertible Notes, the Company entered into warrant transactions (see
Note 12). For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, the Company excluded the warrants outstanding from its diluted EPS 
because the warrants’ strike price of $14.945 was greater than the average market price of our common stock. 

Other  common  stock  equivalents  excluded  from  the  diluted  EPS  calculation  were  unexercised  stock  option  awards  of 
approximately  2,164,000  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2012,  3,514,000  for  the  fiscal  year  and  five  months  ended 
March 31, 2010 and 3,803,000 for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 due to the net loss for those periods. For the fiscal 
year  ended  March 31, 2011,  the  Company  excluded from  its  diluted  EPS  calculation  approximately  2,299,000  of  common
stock equivalents which were antidilutive because the common stock equivalents’ exercise prices exceeded the average fair 
market value of the Company’s common stock. 

Stock-based Compensation 

We have issued stock-based compensation to employees and non-employee consultants, such as ZelnickMedia Corporation. 

We calculated the fair value of our employee and non-employee stock option awards using the Black-Scholes pricing model. 
Employee  stock  option  awards  were  amortized  as  stock-based  compensation  expe
nse  on  a  straight-line  basis  over  the 
rr
expected  vesting  period,  which  was  generally  three  years,  and  reduced  for  estimated  forfeitures.  We  applied  variable 
accounting to our non-employee based stock option awards, whereby we remeasured the fair value of the unvested portion of 
the  awards  at  each  vest  date,  and  recorded  stock-  based  compensation  expense  for  the  difference  between  total  earned 
compensation at the end of the period and total earned compensation at the beginning of the period.

We  value  time-based  restricted  stock  awards  to  employees  using  our  closing  stock  price  on  the  date  of  grant.  Time-based 
restricted  stock  awards  are  amortized  and  recorded  as  expense  on  a  straight-line  basis  over  their  expected  vesting  period,
which is typically three years, and reduced for estimated forfeitures. We apply variable accounting to our non-employee time-
based restricted stock awards, whereby we remeasure the value of such awards at each balance sheet date and adjust the value 
of the awards based on the closing price of our common stock at the end of the reporting period. Changes in the value of the 
awards  from  period  to  period  are  recorded as  stock-  based compensation  expense  over  the  vesting  period,  which  typically 
ranges from three to four years. 

t

Estimated forfeitures are adjusted, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from our estimates.

Market-based restricted stock is typically awarded to executives and non-employee consultants. We estimate the fair value of 
market-based  awards  using  the  Monte  Carlo  Simulation  method  which  takes  into  account  the  probability  that  the  market 
conditions of the awards will be achieved. We apply variable accounting to our non-employee market-based awards. We have
issued  market-  based  awards  that  vest  based  on  a  variety of  conditions.  Our  employee  and  non-employee  market-based 
awards are amortized over their estimated derived service period, which typically ranges from three to four years. 

y

See Note 15 for a full discussion of our stock-based compensation arrangements.

Foreign Currency 

The functional currency for our foreign operations is primarily the applicable local currency. Accounts of foreign operations 
are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates for assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and average prevailing
exchange  rates  for  the  period  for  revenue  and  expense  accounts.  Adjustments  resulting  from  translation  are  included  in
accumulated  other  comprehensive  income  (loss).  Realized  and  unrealized  transaction  gains  and  losses  are  included  in  our 
Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period in which they occur, except on inter-company balances considered to be 
long  term.  Transaction  gains  and  losses  on  inter-company  balances  which  are  considered  to  be  long  term  are  recorded  in 
accumulated  other  comprehensive  income  (loss).  The  Company  recorded  foreign  currency  exchange  transaction  losses  of 

60 

$1,311,  $609  and  $704  for  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2012  and 2010  and  five  months  ended  March 31,  2010,
respectively, and foreign currency exchange transaction gains of $1,414 and $4,289 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011
and October 31, 2009, respectively. 

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined to include all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners
and  distributions  to  owners.  The  Company’s  items  of  accumulated  other  comprehensive  income  (loss)  include  foreign
currency translation adjustments, which relate to investments that are permanent in nature and therefore do not require tax
adjustments,  and  the  net  of  tax  amounts  for  unrealized  gains  (losses)  on  derivative  instruments  designated  as  cash  flow 
hedges. 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements

On  April 1,  2011,  the  Company  adopted  new  guidance  related  to  the  accounting  for  multiple-deliverable  revenue 
arrangements.  These  new  rules  amend  the  existing  guidance  for  separating  consideration  in  multiple-deliverable 
arrangements and establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The adoption of this
new guidance did not have any effect on our consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements 

On  April 1,  2011,  the  Company  adopted  new  guidance  that  changes  the  accounting  model  for  revenue  arrangements  by 
excluding  tangible  products  containing  both  software  and  non-software  components  that  function  together  to  deliver  the
product’s  essential  functionality.  The  adoption  of  this  new  guidance  did  not  have  any  effect  on  our  consolidated  financial 
position, cash flows or results of operations. 

Testing Goodwill for Impairment 

On  September 30,  2011,  the  Company  adopted  new  guidance  related  to  testing  goodwill  for  impairment  effective  for  the 
Company’s  annual  impairment  test  as  of  August 1,  2011. This  new  guidance  permits  an  entity  to  make  a  qualitative 
assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying value as a basis for 
determining  whether  it  is  necessary  to  perform  the  two-step  goodwill  impairment  test.  If  it  is  determined  through  the 
qualitative assessment that a reporting unit’s fair value is more likely than not greater than its carrying value, the remainin
g
impairment  steps  would  be  unnecessary.  The  qualitative  assessment  is  optional,  allowing  entities  to  go  directly  to  the
quantitative assessment. This new guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal 
years beginning after December 15, 2011. However, early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill 
impairment  tests  performed  as  of  a  date  before  September 15, 2011,  if  an  entity’s  financial  statements  for  the  most  recent 
annual or interim period have not yet been issued. The early  adoption of this new guidance did not have any effect on our 
consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations. 

r

Comprehensive Income 

In June 2011, new guidance was issued related to the presentation of comprehensive income. The main provisions of the new
guidance provide that an entity that reports items of other comprehensive income has the option to present comprehensive
income as (i) a single statement that presents the components of net income and total net income, the components of other 
comprehensive income and total other comprehensive income and a total for comprehensive income or (ii) in two separate
but consecutive statements, whereby an entity must present the components of net income and total net income in the first 
statement  and  that  statement  is  immediately  followed  by  a  financial  statement  that  presents  the  components  of  other 
comprehensive  income,  a  total  for  other  comprehensive  income  and  a  total  for  comprehensive  income.  The  new  rules 
eliminate  the  option  to  present  the  components  of  other  comprehensive  income  as  part  of  the  statement  of  stockholders’
equity. These new rules are to be applied retrospectively and become effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within 
those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (April 1, 2012 for the Company), with early adoption permitted. 
We do not  expect  the  adoption  of  this new guidance  to have  a  material  effect on our consolidated  financial position,  cash
flows or results of operations. 

61 

2. 

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS 

In  February 2010,  we  completed  the  sale  of  our  Jack  of  All  Games  third-party  distribution  business,  which  primarily
distributed  third-party  interactive  entertainment  software,  hardware  and  accessories  in  North  America,  for  approximately 
$44,000,  including  $37,250  in  cash,  subject  to  purchase  price  adjustments,  and  up  to  an  additional  $6,750,  subject  to  the 
achievement of certain items, which were not met. In April 2011, we settled on the purchase adjustments and as a result the
purchase price was lowered by $1,475. Consequently, the net purchase price after the settlement was $35,775. The sale has
allowed us  to focus  our  resources on our  publishing  operations.  The  financial  information  of  our distribution  business  has
been classified as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Financial Statements for all of the periods presented. 

The following is a summary of the results of the discontinued operations: 

Net revenue
Loss before income taxes 
Loss on sale 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 
Net loss

$—
$(1,116)
—
—
$(1,116)

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2011

2012

2010
(Unaudited)
$— $254,447
$(16,484)
(447)
(1,996)
$(14,935)

$(4,416)
(570)
360
$(5,346)

Five Months 
Ended March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year
Ended October 31,
2009

$131,937
$(2,216) 
(447) 
(413)
$(2,250) 

$267,431
$(9,983)
—
34
$(10,017)

The results for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 include an expense of $5,464 related to a liability for a lease assumption
without economic benefit less estimates of sublease income. The lease matures on September 30, 2014.

The following is a summary of the liabilities of discontinued operations: 

Liabilities of discontinued operations: 
Current:
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 

Total current liabilities
Other non-current liabilities 
Total liabilities of discontinued operations

3. 

MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 

March 31,

2012

2011

$1,412
1,412
2,319
$3,731

$2,842
2,842
3,255
$6,097

In  March 2007,  we  entered  into  a  management  services  agreement  (as  amended,  the  “Management  Agreement”)  with 
ZelnickMedia Corporation (“ZelnickMedia”), whereby ZelnickMedia provides us with certain management, consulting and 
executive  level  services.  Strauss  Zelnick,  the  President  of  ZelnickMedia,  serves  as  our  Executive  Chairman  and  Chief 
Executive  Officer  and  Karl  Slatoff,  a  partner  of  ZelnickMedia,  serves  as  our  Chief  Operating  Officer.  In  May 2011,  we
entered  into  a  new  management  agreement  (the  “New  Management  Agreement”)  with  ZelnickMedia  pursuant  to  which
ZelnickMedia  will  continue  to  provide  management,  consulting  and  executive  level  services  to the  Company  through 
May 2015.  As  part  of  the  New  Management  Agreement,  Mr. Zelnick  serves  as  Executive  Chairman  and  Chief  Executive 
Officer and Mr. Slatoff serves as Chief Operating Officer. In September 2011, the New Management Agreement, which upon 
effectiveness,  superseded  and  replaced  the  Management  Agreement  was  approved  by  the  Company’s  stockholders  at  the 
Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting. The New Management Agreement provides for the annual management fee to remain at 
$2,500, subject to annual increases in the amount of 3% over the term of the agreement, and the maximum annual bonus was 
increased to $3,500 from $2,500, subject to annual increases in the amount of 3% over the term of the agreement, based on 
the Company achieving certain performance thresholds. In consideration for ZelnickMedia’s services, we recorded consulting 
expense (a component of general and administrative expenses) of $2,500, $5,521, $3,021, $1,563 and $2,500 for the fiscal
years  ended  March 31,  2012,  2011  and 2010,  five  months  ended  March 31,  2010  and  fiscal  year  ended  October 31,  2009,
respectively.

Pursuant to the Management Agreement, we also issued stock-based awards to ZelnickMedia. See Note 15 for a discussion of 
such awards.

62 

4. 

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS 

We  follow  a  three-level  fair  value  hierarchy  that  prioritizes  the  inputs  used  to  measure  fair  value.  This  hierarchy  requires
entities to maximize the use of “observable inputs” and minimize the use of “unobservable inputs.” The three levels of inputs 
used to measure fair value are as follows: 

•  Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

•  Level 2—Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for markets that 

r
are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

•  Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the 
fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies
and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

The table below segregates all assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (which is measured at least annually)
into  the  most  appropriate  level  within  the  fair  value  hierarchy  based  on  the  inputs  used  to  determine  the  fair  value  at  the 
measurement date. 

Money market funds 
Bank-time deposits 

March 31,
2012
$211,711
$126,820

Quoted prices 
in active markets
for identical assets
(level 1)

$211,711
$126,820

Significant other
observable inputs
(level 2)

Significant unobservable
inputs
(level 3)

$— 
$— 

$—
$—

5. 

BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS AND CONSOLIDATION 

In prior years, we consummated the acquisitions described below, which largely reflect our strategy to diversify our business
by  adding  experienced  development  studios,  intellectual  properties  and  talented  personnel  resources  to  our  existing 
infrastructure. The acquisitions were not considered to be material to our Consolidated Statements of Operations, individually
or in the aggregate. The results of operations and financial positions of these acquisitions are included in our Consolidated 
Financial Statements from their respective acquisition dates forward and therefore affect comparability from period to period. 
During  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31, 2012,  2011  and 2010,  five  months  ended  March 31,  2010  and  fiscal  year  ended 
October 31, 2009, we paid contingent consideration in cash of $4,101, $1,000, $6,804, $991 and $5,813, respectively, for our 
prior  year  acquisitions.  During  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2012  and  2011,  we  paid  $2,000  and  $2,000  by  issuing 
128,439 and 192,826 shares, respectively, of our unregistered common stock as contingent consideration for our prior year 
acquisitions.

t

Acquisition
Date
March 2008 

Cash and
Development 
Advances
Paid

Value of 
Stock 
Issued

Goodwill 
Recorded on
Acquisition
Date

$4,715

$1,353

$4,617

Acquired Business
Mad Doc
Software LLC

Illusion Softworks 

December 2007 

5,033

27,875

24,901

Identified
Intangible
Assets

Contingent Consideration

$1,275  Up  to  $15,000  payable  in  cash  or 
stock,  based  on  meeting  certain
employment  provisions  and  future 
product sales, of which $1,250 was 
paid as of March 31, 2012. 
8,200  Up  to  $10,000  based  on  future 
product sales, of which $8,601 was
paid as of March 31, 2012.

In  March 2008,  we  acquired  the  assets  of  Rockstar  New  England, Inc.,  formerly  known  as  Mad  Doc  Software LLC 
(“Rockstar New England”), an independent development studio in North America and developer of the Bully franchise. Total
consideration  paid  upon  acquisition  was $6,068,  consisting  of  $3,740  in  cash,  53,033  shares  of  our  unregistered  common 
stock and $975 of development advances paid prior to the acquisition. The terms of the transaction also include additional 
contingent deferred payments payable in cash or stock of up to $15,000, which are being allocated to purchase price when the
conditions requiring their payment are met. The goodwill recorded in connection with this acquisition is deductible for tax
purposes.

63 

In December 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of 2K Czech a.s., formerly known as Illusion Softworks,
a.s. (“2K Czech”), the Czech Republic developer of the Mafia video game franchise. The acquisition reflects our strategy to 
add high-value intellectual property and development studios to our portfolio. Total consideration paid upon acquisition was
$32,908, consisting primarily of 1,496,647 shares of our unregistered common stock and $4,645 of development advances
paid prior to the acquisition. The terms of the transaction also include additional co
ntingent deferred payments in cash and 
f
stock of up to $10,000, which are being allocated to purchase price when the conditions requiring their payment are met. The 
goodwill recorded in connection with this acquisition is 

not deductible for tax purposes.

n

6. 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows: 

Net income (loss) 
Foreign currency translation adjustment 
Change in unrealized gains on derivative 

instruments, net 

Comprehensive income (loss)

7. 

INVENTORY

Inventory balances by category are as follows:

Finished products 
Parts and supplies
Inventory 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2010
2011
2012
(Unaudited)
$(108,816) $48,458 $(122,995)
21,394
14,172

(3,785)

59

—
$(112,542) $62,630 $(101,601)

—

Five Months Ended
March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year Ended
October 31,
2009

$(28,802) 
(11,905) 

$(140,454)
15,705

—
$(40,707)

—
$(124,749)

March 31,

2012
$20,076
2,401
$22,477

2011
$21,541
3,037
$24,578

Estimated product returns included in inventory at March 31, 2012 and 2011 were $1,610 and $1,183, respectively. 

8. 

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND LICENSES

Details of our capitalized software development costs and licenses are as follows:

Software development costs, internally developed 
Software development costs, externally developed 
Licenses 
Software development costs and licenses 

March 31, 2012

March 31, 2011

Current
$154,557
53,542
3,125
$211,224

Non-current

Current

$84,315 
14,440
6,000 
$104,755

$65,297
65,292
1,087
$131,676

Non-current
$100,251
38,069
—
$138,320

Software  development  costs  and  licenses  as  of  March 31,  2012  and 2011  included  $313,090  and  $263,082,  respectively,
related to titles that have not been released. 

64 

Amortization and impairment of software development costs and licenses are as follows:

Amortization and impairment of software

development costs and licenses 

Less: Portion representing stock-based compensation 
Amortization and impairment, net of stock-based 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,

2012

2011

2010
(Unaudited)

Five Months Ended
March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year Ended
October 31,
2009

$155,844 $154,506
(10,695)

(5,144)

$117,955
(5,213)

$53,108 
(2,152)

$111,615
(6,094)

compensation 

$150,700 $143,811

$112,742

$50,956 

$105,521

9. 

FIXED ASSETS, NET

Fixed asset balances by category are as follows:

Computer equipment 
Computer software 
Leasehold improvements 
Office equipment 
Furniture and fixtures 

Less: accumulated depreciation
Fixed assets, net 

March 31,

2012
$41,827
32,645
27,604
6,331
5,366
113,773
94,824
$18,949

2011
$38,224
29,900
24,733
5,853
5,052
103,762
84,130
$19,632

Depreciation expense related to fixed assets for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, five months ended 
March 31, 2010 and fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 was $11,467, $14,016, $15,169, $6,180 and $15,713, respectively. 

10. 

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET 

We  perform  an  annual  test  for  impairment  of  goodwill  as  of  the  beginning  of  August  or  whenever  events  or  changes  in
circumstances  indicate  the  fair  value  of  a  reporting  unit  is  below  its  carrying  amount.  In  the  evaluation  of  goodwill  for 
impairment, we first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the
reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. If it is determined through the qualitative assessment that a reporting unit’s
fair value is more likely than not greater than its carrying value, the remaining impairment steps would be unnecessary. If 
however it is determined through the qualitative assessment that a reporting unit’s fair value is more likely than not less than 
its  carrying  value,  we  must  then perform  a  quantitative  assessment  and  compare  the  fair  value 
of  the  reporting  unit  to  the 
carrying value. The first step of the quantitative assessment  measures impairment by  applying fair value-based tests at the 
reporting unit level. The second step (if necessary) measures the amount of impairment by applying fair value-based tests to
individual assets and liabilities within each reporting unit. Prior to the sale of our Jack of All Games third-party distribution 
business,  which  closed  in  February 2010  (see  Note 2),  we  managed  our  business  primarily  based  on  our  publishing  and 
distribution businesses. Accordingly, after the sale of the assets of our distribution business, the Company operates as a single 
reporting unit.

t

In performing the quantitative assessment we measure the fair value of the reporting unit using a combination of the income
approach,  which  uses  discounted  cash  flows,  and  the  market  approach,  which  uses  market  capitalization  and  comparable 
companies’  data.  Each  step  requires  us  to  make  judgments  and  involves  the  use  of  significant  estimates  and  assumptions.
These  estimates  and  assumptions  include  long-term  growth  rates  and  operating  margins  used  to  calculate  projected  future 
cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates based on our weighted average cost of capital, future economic and market conditions 
and  the  determination  of  appropriate  market  comparables.  Our  estimates  for  market  growth  are  based  on  historical  data, 
various internal estimates and observable external sources when available, and are based on assumptions that are consistent 
with the plans and estimates we use to manage the underlying business.

r
Due to a decline in the retail environment during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 and its effect on our outlook for our 
distribution reporting unit, we determined that the goodwill and intangible assets attributed to our distribution reporting unit 
were  impaired.  As  a  result,  we  recorded  an  impairment  charge of  $14,754  which  was  reported  in  loss  from  discontinued 
operations on the Consolidated Statements of Operations (see Note 2). For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 
and five months ended March 31, 2010, we did not recognize an impairment loss on goodwill. 

65 

The change in our goodwill balance is as follows:

Balance at March 31, 2010 
Additions and adjustments 
Currency translation adjustment 
Balance at March 31, 2011 
Additions and adjustments 
Currency translation adjustment 
Balance at March 31, 2012

Total
$216,289
5,272
3,609
225,170
5,000
(2,001)
$228,169

The following table sets forth the components of the intangible assets subject to amortization: 

Intellectual property 
Trademarks 
Technology 
Non-compete 

Estimated
Useful
Lives
(Years)
2-6
7-10
3 
5-10 

March 31, 2012

March 31, 2011

Gross
Carrying
Amount
$26,957
13,860
4,333
5,245
$50,395

Accumulated
Amortization
$(11,724)
(13,339)
(3,893)
(5,173)
$(34,129)

Net Book 
Value
$15,233
521
440
72
$16,266

Gross
Carrying
Amount
$26,962 
13,796 
4,394 
5,246 
$50,398 

Accumulated 
Amortization
$(10,744)
(12,910)
(3,954)
(4,957)
$(32,565)

Net Book 
Value
$16,218
886
440
289
$17,833

Amortization of intangible assets is included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows:

Cost of goods sold 
Depreciation and amortization
Total amortization of intangible assets

2011

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2010
2012
(Unaudited)
$109
1,234
$1,343

$3,927
983
$4,910

$983
656
$1,639

Five Months Ended
March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year Ended
October 31,
2009

$40 
442 
$482 

$478
1,861
$2,339

Estimated future amortization of intangible assets that will be recorded in cost of goods sold and operating expenses for the
years ending March 31 are as follows: 

2013 
2014 
2015 
2016 
2017 
Thereafter 
Total

$6,083
9,210
932
12
12
17
$16,266

11. 

ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of:

Income tax payable and deferred tax liability
Licenses 
Software development royalties 
Compensation and benefits
Marketing and promotions
Rent and deferred rent obligations 
Professional fees 
Deferred consideration for acquisitions 
Other 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 

66 

March 31,

2012
$38,490
32,706
31,689
15,435
9,771
5,511
4,387
1,399
17,380
$156,768

2011
$12,481
28,488
63,720
19,699
8,238
5,006
4,093
2,500
14,234
$158,459

12. 

LONG-TERM DEBT

Credit Agreement 

In  October 2011,  we  entered  into  a  Second  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  Agreement  (the  “Credit  Agreement”)  which 
amended and restated our July 2007 Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement provides for borrowings of up to $100,000, 
which may be increased by up to $40,000 pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, and is secured by substantially all of 
our assets and the equity of our subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement expires on October 17, 2016. Revolving loans under the
Credit Agreement bear interest at our election of (a) 1.50% to 2.00% above a certain base rate (4.75% at March 31, 2012), or 
(b) 2.50%  to  3.00%  above  the  LIBOR  Rate  (approximately  2.74%  at  March 31,  2012),  w
ith  the  margin rate  subject  to  the 
a
achievement of certain average liquidity levels. We are also required to pay a monthly fee on the unused available balance, 
ranging from  0.375%  to 0.50% based on  availability. We  had no outstanding  borrowings  at  March 31, 2012 related  to  the 
Credit Agreement.

Prior to its amendment and restatement in October 2011, the July 2007 Credit Agreement provided for borrowings of up to
$140,000  and  was  secured  by  substantially  all  of  our  assets  and  the  equity  of  our  subsidiaries.  We  had  no  outstanding
borrowings at March 31, 2011 related to the July 2007 Credit Agreement. 

Availability under the Credit Agreement is restricted by our domestic and United Kingdom based accounts receivable and 
inventory balances. The Credit Agreement also allows for the issuance of letters of credit in an aggregate amount of up to 
$25,000. 

Information related to availability on our Credit Agreement is as follows:

Available borrowings 
Outstanding letters of credit 

March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011
$115,503
1,664

$79,069 
1,664 

We recorded $1,248, $1,783, $2,731, $910 and $4,782 of interest expense and fees related to the Credit Agreement for the 
fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2012,  2011  and 2010,  five  months  ended  March 31, 2010  and  fiscal  year  ended  October 31,
2009, respectively. 

The Credit Agreement contains covenants that substantially limit us and our subsidiaries’ ability to: create, incur, assume or 
be liable for indebtedness; dispose of assets outside the ordinary course of business; acquire, merge or consolidate with or 
into another person or entity; create, incur or allow any lien on any of their respective properties; make investments; or pay 
dividends or make distributions (each subject to certain limitations); or optionally prepay any indebtedness (subject to certain
exceptions,  including  an  exception  permitting  the  redemption  of  the  Company’s Convertible  Notes  upon  the  meeting  of 
certain  minimum  liquidity  requirements).  In  addition,  the  Credit  Agreement  provides  for  certain  events  of  default  such  as
nonpayment  of  principal  and  interest,  breaches  of  representations  and  warranties,  noncompliance  with  covenants,  acts  of 
insolvency,  default  on  indebtedness  held  by  third-parties  and  default  on  certain
n
material  contracts  (subject  to  certain 
d
limitations and cure periods). The Credit Agreement also contains a requirement that we maintain an interest coverage ratio 
of  more  than one  to  one  for  the  trailing  twelve  month period,  if  certain  average  liquidity levels  fall  below $30,000. As of 
March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all covenants and requirements outlined

in the Credit Agreement. 

aa

4.375% Convertible Notes Due 2014 

In  June 2009,  we  issued  $138,000  aggregate  principal  amount of  4.375%  Convertible  No
tes  due 2014  (the  “4.375% 
Convertible  Notes”).  The  issuance  of  the  4.375%  Convertible  Notes  included  $18,000  related  to  the  exercise  of  an  over-
allotment  option  by  the  underwriters.  Interest  on  the  4.375%  Convertible  Notes  is  payable  semi-annually  in  arrears  on 
June 1st and  December 1
t
st of  each  year,  and  commenced  on  December 1,  2009.  The  4.375%  Convertible  Notes  mature  on
June 1, 2014, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased by the Company or converted.

t

t

The 4.375% Convertible Notes are convertible at an initial conversion rate of 93.6768 shares of ou
r common stock per $1
principal amount of 4.375% Convertible Notes (representing an initial conversion price of approximately $10.675 per share
of  common  stock  for  a  total  of  approximately  12,927,000  underlying  conversion  shares)  subject to  adjustment  in  certain 
circumstances.  Holders  may  convert  the  4.375%  Convertible  Notes  at  their  option  prior  to  the  close  of  business  on  the 
business day immediately preceding December 1, 2013 only under the following circumstances: (1) during any fiscal quarter 
commencing after July 31, 2009, if the last reported sale price of the common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or 
not consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter 

f

67 

t

is  greater  than  or  equal  to  130%  of  the  applicable  conversion  price  on  each  applicable  trading  day;  (2) during  the  five 
business day period after any 10 consecutive trading day period (the “measurement period”) in which the trading price per $1
principal amount of 4.375% Convertible Notes for each day of that measurement period was less than 98% of the product of 
the  last  reported  sale  price  of  our  common stock  and  the  applicable  conversion  rate  on  each  such  day;  (3) if  we  call  the
4.375% Convertible Notes for redemption, at any time prior to the close of business on the third scheduled trading day prior 
to  the  redemption date;  or  (4) upon  the occurrence  of  specified  corporate  events.  On  and  after December 1, 2013 until  the
close  of  business  on  the  third  scheduled  trading  day  immediately  preceding  the  maturity  date,  holders  may  convert  their 
4.375% Convertible Notes at any time, regardless of the foregoing circumstances. Upon conversion, the 4.375% Convertible 
Notes  may  be  settled,  at  our  election,  in  cash,  shares  of  our  common  stock,  or  a  combination  of  cash  and  shares  of  the 
Company’s common stock. Our common stock price exceeded 130% of the applicable conversion price of $10.675 per share 
for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading days ended March 31, 2012. Accordingly, as of April 1, 2012,
the  4.375%  Convertible  Notes  may  be  converted  at  the  holder’s  option  through  June 30,  2012.  If  the  4.375%  Convertible 
Notes  were  to  be  converted  during  this  period,  our  current  intent  and  ability, given  our  option,  would  be  to  settle  the
conversion in shares of our common stock. As such, we have continued to classify these 4.375% Convertible Notes as long-
term debt.

r

At any time on or after June 5, 2012, the Company may redeem all of the outstanding 4.375% C
onvertible Notes for cash, but 
m
only if the last reported sale of our common stock for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days
ending  on  the  trading  day  prior  to  the  date  we  provide  notice  of  redemption  to  holders  of  the  4.375%  Convertible  Notes 
exceeds  150%  of  the  conversion  price  in  effect  on  each  such  trading  day.  The  redemption  price  will  equal  100%  of  the 
principal amount of the 4.375% Convertible Notes to be redeemed, plus all accrued and unpaid interest (including additional
interest, if any) to, but excluding, the redemption date.

Upon the occurrence of certain fundamental changes involving the Company, holders of the 4.375% Convertible Notes may
require us to purchase all or a portion of their 4.375% Convertible Notes for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal 
amount of the notes to be purchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest (including additional interest, if any) to, but excluding,
the fundamental change purchase date.

The indenture governing the 4.375% Convertible Notes contains customary terms and covenants and events of default. If an
event of default (as defined therein) occurs and is continuing, the Trustee by notice to the Company, or the holders of at least
25%  in  aggregate  principal  amount  of  the  4.375%  Convertible Notes  then  outstanding  by  notice  to  the  Company  and  the
Trustee, may, and the Trustee at the request of such holders shall, declare 100% of the principal of and accrued and unpaid 
interest (including additional interest, if any) on all the 4.375% Convertible Notes to be due and payable. In the case of an
event of default arising out of certain bankruptcy events, 100% of the principal of and accrued and unpaid interest (including 
additional interest, if any), on the 4.375% Convertible Notes will automatically become due and payable immediately. As of 
March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all covenants and requirements outlined in the indenture governing the 4.375% 
Convertible Notes. 

The 4.375% Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to our existing and future 
indebtedness  that  may  be  expressly  subordinated  in  right  of  payment  to  the  4.375
%  Convertible  Notes;  equal  in  right  of 
payment to our existing and future indebtedness that is not so subordinated; junior in right of payment to any of our secured 
indebtedness  to  the  extent  of  the  value of  the  assets  securing such  indebtedness;  and  structurally  junior  to  all  existing  and
future indebtedness incurred by our subsidiaries. 

f

In connection with the offering of the 4.375% Convertible Notes, we entered into convertible note hedge transactions which
are expected to reduce the potential dilution to our common stock upon conversion of the 4.375% Convertible Notes. The 
convertible  note  hedge  transactions  allow  the  Company  to  receive  shares  of  its  common  stock  related  to  the  excess 
conversion  value  that  it  would  convey  to  the  holders  of  the  4.375%  Convertible  Notes  upon  conversion.  The  transactions 
include  options  to  purchase  approximately 12,927,000  shares  of  common  stock  at  $10.675  per  share,  expiring  on  June 1, 
2014, for a total cost of approximately $43,600, which was charged to additional paid-in capital. 

Separately, the Company entered into a warrant transaction with a strike price of $14.945 per share. The warrants will be net 
share  settled  and  will  cover  approximately  12,927,000  shares  of  the  Company’s  common  stock  and  expire  on  August 30, 
2014, for total proceeds of approximately $26,300, which was credited to additional paid-in capital.

A portion of the net proceeds from the 4.375% Convertible Notes offering was used to pay the net cost of the convertible
note  hedge  transactions  (after  such  cost was  partially  offset  by  proceeds  from
m
  the  sale  of  the  warrants).  We  recorded
t
approximately $3,410 of banking, legal and accounting fees related to the issuance of the 4.375% Convertible Notes which
were  capitalized  as  debt  issuance  costs  and  will  be  amortized  to  interest  and  other,  net  over  the  term  of  the  4.375% 
Convertible Notes. 

68 

The following table provides additional information related to our 4.375% Convertible Notes: 

Additional paid-in capital
Principal amount of 4.375% Convertible Notes
Unamortized discount of the liability component 
Net carrying amount of 4.375% Convertible Notes
Carrying amount of debt issuance costs 

March 31,

2012
$42,018
$138,000
22,369
$115,631
$1,479

2011
$42,018
$138,000
30,761
$107,239
$2,161

The following table provides the components of interest expense related to our 4.375% Convertible Notes: 

Cash interest expense (coupon interest expense)
Non-cash amortization of discount on 4.375% Convertible 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2010
2012
(Unaudited)
$5,032

$6,004

2011

$6,038

Notes

7,374
Amortization of debt issuance costs
682
Total interest expense related to 4.375% Convertible Notes $15,112 $14,060

8,392
682

5,457
566
$11,055

1.75% Convertible Notes Due 2016 

Five Months 
Ended March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year
Ended October 31,
2009

$2,516 

2,802 
284 
$5,602 

$2,516

2,655
282
$5,453

On November 16, 2011, we issued $250,000 aggregate principal amount of 1.75% Convertible Notes due 2016 (the “1.75%
Convertible Notes” and together with the 4.375% Convertible Notes, the “Convertible Notes”). The issuance of the 1.75% 
Convertible Notes included $30,000 related to the exercise of an over-allotment option by the underwriters. Interest on the
st of  each  year,  commencing  on 
1.75%  Convertible  Notes  is  payable  semi-annually  in  arrears  on  June 1st and  December 1
t
June 1,  2012.  The  1.75%  Convertible  Notes  mature  on  December 1,  2016,  unless  earlier  repu
rchased  by  the  Company  or 
converted. The Company does not have the right to redeem the 1.75% Convertible Notes prior to maturity.

r

t

The  1.75%  Convertible  Notes  are  convertible at  an  initial  conversion  rate  of  52.3745  shares  of  our  common  stock  per  $1
principal amount of 1.75% Convertible Notes (representing an initial conversion price of approximately $19.093 per share of 
common  stock  for  a  total  of  approximately  13,094,000  underlying  conversion  shares)  subject  to  adjustment  in  certain
circumstances. Holders may convert the 1.75% Convertible Notes at their option prior to the close of business on the business 
day immediately preceding June 1, 2016 only under the following circumstances: (1) during any fiscal quarter commencing 
after  March 31,  2012,  if  the  last  reported  sale  price  of  the  common  stock  for  at  least  20 trading  days  (whether  or  not 
consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter is 
greater than or equal to 130% of the applicable conversion price on each applicable trading day; (2) during the five business 
day period after any 10 consecutive trading day period (the “measurement period”) in which the trading price per $1 principal 
amount of 1.75% Convertible Notes for each day of that measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last 
reported sale price of our common stock and the applicable conversion rate on each such day; or (3) upon the occurrence of 
specified corporate events. On and after June 1, 2016 until the close of business on the business day immediately preceding 
the maturity date, holders may convert their 1.75% Convertible Notes at any time, regardless of the foregoing circumstances. 
Upon  conversion,  the 1.75% Convertible Notes  may  be  settled,  at  our  election, in  cash,  shares  of  our  common  stock,  or  a
combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock.

h

Upon the occurrence of certain fundamental changes involving the Company, holders of the 1.75% Convertible Notes may 
require us to purchase all or a portion of their 1.75% Convertible Notes for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal 
amount of the notes to be purchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest (including additional interest, if any) to, but excluding,
the fundamental change purchase date. 

The indenture governing the 1.75% Convertible Notes contains customary terms and covenants and events of default. If an 
event of default (as defined therein) occurs and is continuing, the Trustee by notice to the Company, or the holders of at least
25%  in  aggregate  principal  amount  of  the  1.75%  Convertible Notes  then  outstanding  by  notice  to  the  Company  and  the 
Trustee, may, and the Trustee at the request of such holders shall, declare 100% of the principal of and accrued and unpaid 
interest  (including  additional interest,  if  any) on  all  the 1.75%  Convertible  Notes  to be  due  and payable. In  the  case  of  an
event of default arising out of certain bankruptcy events, 100% of the principal of and accrued and unpaid interest (including 

69 

 
 
 
additional interest, if any), on the 1.75% Convertible Notes will automatically become due and payable immediately. As of 
March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all covenants and requirements outlined in the indenture governing the 1.75% 
Convertible Notes.

The 1.75% Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to our existing and future
indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the 1.75% Convertible Notes; equal in right of payment to
our existing and future indebtedness that is not so subordinated; effectively junior in right of payment to any of our secured 
indebtedness  to  the  extent  of  the  value of  the  assets  securing  such  indebtedness; and  structurally  junior  to  all  existing  and
future indebtedness incurred by our subsidiaries.

We separately account for the liability and equity components of the 1.75% Convertible Notes in a manner that reflects the 
Company’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. We estimated the fair 
value of the 1.75% Convertible Notes to be $197,373, as of the date of issuance of our 1.75% Convertible Notes, assuming a
6.9%  non-convertible  borrowing  rate.  The  carrying  amount  of  the  equity  component  was  determined  to  be  $52,627  by 
deducting  the  fair  value  of  the  liability  component  from  the  par  value  of  the  1.75%  Convertible  Notes.  The  excess  of  the 
principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount is amortized to interest and other, net over the term of 
the  1.75%  Convertible  Notes  using  the  effective  interest  method.  The  equity  compone
nt  is  not  remeasured  as  long  as  it 
ff
continues to meet the conditions for equity classification. In accounting for the $6,875 of banking, legal and accounting fees
related  to  the  issuance  of  the  1.75%  Convertible  Notes,  we  allocated  $5,428  to  the  liability  component  and  $1,447  to  the
equity component. Debt issuance costs attributable to the liability component are being amortized to interest and other, net 
over the term of the 1.75% Convertible Notes, and issuance costs attributable to the equity component were netted with the
equity component in additional paid-in capital.

f

The following table provides additional information related to our 1.75% Convertible Notes:

Additional paid-in capital
Principal amount of 1.75% Convertible Notes
Unamortized discount of the liability component 
Net carrying amount of 1.75% Convertible Notes
Carrying amount of debt issuance costs 

The following table provides the components of interest expense related to our 1.75% Convertible Notes:

Cash interest expense (coupon interest expense)
Non-cash amortization of discount on 1.75% Convertible Notes
t
Amortization of debt issuance costs
Total interest expense related to 1.75% Convertible Notes

13. 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

March 31, 2012

$51,180
$250,000
49,291
$200,709
$4,979

Fiscal Year Ended 
March 31, 2012

$1,641
3,336
449
$5,426

A summary of annual minimum contractual obligations and commitments as of March 31, 2012 is as follows: 

Fiscal Year Ending March 31,
2013 
2014 
2015 
2016 
2017 
Thereafter 
Total

Licensing
and
Marketing

$61,591
16,520
10,825
13,893
12,400
20,250
$135,479

Operating
Software 
Leases
Development
$16,506
$37,759
14,991
10,728
11,073
809
9,804
—
—
4,958
— 29,828
$87,160

$49,296

Purchase
Obligations
$4,057
4,305
2,341
899
—
—
$11,602

70 

Convertible
Notes Interest

Convertible
Notes

Total

$10,595 
10,413 
7,394 
4,375 
4,375 
—
$37,152 

138,000

$— $130,508
— 56,957
170,442
— 28,971
271,733
— 50,078
$388,000 $708,689

250,000

Licensing and Marketing Agreements:  Our licensing commitments primarily consist of obligations to holders of intellectual 
property rights for use of their trademarks, copyrights, technology or other intellectual property rights in the development of
our products. In addition, we have certain minimum marketing support commitments where we commit to spend specified 
amounts  related  to  marketing  our  products.  Licensing  and  marketing  commitments  expire  at  various  times  through
September 2018  and  primarily  reflect  our  agreements  with  major  sports  leagues  and  players’  associations.  Certain  of  our 
a
mm
licensing  and  marketing  agreements  also  contain  provisions  that  would  im
pose  penalties  if  we  fail  to  meet  agreed  upon 
software release dates.

n

aa

Software Development Agreements:  We make payments to third-party software developers that include contractual payments
to developers under several software development agreements that expire at various times through July 2014. Our aggregate 
outstanding software development commitments assume satisfactory performance by third-party software developers. 

Lease  Commitments:    Our  offices  are  occupied  under  non-cancelable  operating  leases  expiring  at  various  times  through
March 2023.  We  also  lease  certain  furniture,  equipment  and  automobiles  under  non-cancelable  leases  expiring  through
March 2020. Some of the leases have fixed rent increases and also include inducements to enter into the lease. The effect of 
such  amounts  are  deferred  and  recognized  on  a  straight-line  basis  over  the  related  lease  term.  Included  in  the  cash
commitments  for  operating  leases  above  is  a  lease  assumption  without  economic  benefit  related  to  our  discontinued 
operations.  See  Note 2  to  our  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  for  additional  information  regarding  discontinued 
operations. Rent expense amounted to $16,018, $14,088, $13,809, $6,131 and $13,601 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 
2012, 2011 and 2010, five months ended March 31, 2010 and fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, respectively.

Purchase obligations:  These obligations are primarily related to agreements to purchase services that are enforceable and 
legally binding on the Company that specifies all significant terms, including fixed, minimum or variable pricing provisions;
and the approximate timing of the transactions, expiring at various times through October 2015.

Contingent  Consideration:   Part  of  our  business  acquisition  strategy  has  been  to  make  a  portion  of  the  purchase  price  of 
certain  acquisitions  dependent  on  product  delivery  or  future  product  sales.  The  amounts  and  timing  of  these  payments  are 
currently  not  fixed  or  determinable.  See  Note 5  for  a  discussion  of  our  contingent  commitments  related  to  our  business
acquisitions. 

Employee Savings Plan:  We maintain a 401(k) retirement savings plan and trust. Our 401(k) plan is offered to all eligible 
employees and participants may make voluntary contributions. The Company matched a portion of the contributions during
the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, five months ended March 31, 2010 and fiscal year ended October 31, 
2009 and the matching contribution expense incurred by us was $3,130, $2,767, $2,616, $1,146 and $2,665, respectively. 

Income Taxes:  At March 31, 2012, the Company had recorded a liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits of $15,621 for 
e
which we are unable to make a reasonable and reliable estimate of the period in which these liabilities will be settled with th
respective tax authorities, therefore, these liabilities have not been included in the contractual

obligations table.

n

n

Legal  and  Other  Proceedings:    We  are,  or  may  become,  subject  to  demands  and  claims  (including  intellectual  property 
claims) and are involved in routine litigation in the ordinary course of business which we do not believe to be material to our
business or financial statements. We have appropriately accrued amounts related to certain of these claims and legal and other 
proceedings. While it is reasonably possible that a loss  may be incurred in excess of the amounts accrued in our financial 
statements, we believe that such losses, unless otherwise disclosed, would not be material. 

14. 

INCOME TAXES 

Components of income (loss) before income taxes are as follows: 

Domestic 
Foreign
Income (loss) from continuing operations 

before income taxes

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,

2012

2011

$(62,655) $29,926
33,697
(41,182)

2010
(Unaudited)

$(38,182)
(56,733)

Five Months 
Ended March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year
Ended October 31,
2009

$2,688 
(24,974) 

$(78,825)
(47,125)

$(103,837) $63,623

$(94,915)

$(22,286)

$(125,950)

71 

 
 
Provision for current and deferred income taxes consists of the following:

Current:

U.S. federal 
U.S. state and local 
Foreign

Total current income taxes 
Deferred: 

U.S. federal 
U.S. state and local
Foreign

Total deferred income taxes
Provision for income taxes 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,

2012

2011

2010
(Unaudited)

$(729) $3,193
1,521
(55)
6,189
2,769
1,985 10,903

1,712
126
40

(798)
(45)
(241)
1,878 (1,084)
$3,863 $9,819

$(3,666)
52
8,925
5,311

8,486
293
(945)
7,834
$13,145

Five Months 
Ended March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year
Ended October 31,
2009

$(4,566) 
124 
5,404 
962 

3,458 
255 
(409)
3,304 
$4,266 

$(3,870)
(779)
6,475
1,826

3,633
(40)
(932)
2,661
$4,487

A reconciliation of our effective tax rate to the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate is as follows:

U.S. federal statutory rate
Foreign tax rate differential
State and local taxes, net of U.S. federal benefit 
Federal valuation allowance 
Other 
Effective tax rate 

2011

2012

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2010
(Unaudited)
(35.0)%
29.0%
(1.3)%
15.1%
6.0%
13.8%

(35.0)% 35.0%
16.5% (7.1)%
0.0% 1.3%
20.5% (19.8)%
1.7% 6.0%
3.7% 15.4%

Five Months 
Ended March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year
Ended October 31,
2009

(35.0)% 
61.7% 
0.8% 
(4.7)% 
(3.7)%
19.1%

(35.0)%
22.1%
(1.9)%
23.9%
(5.5)%
3.6%

The effects of temporary differences that gave rise to our deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows: 

Current deferred tax assets and (liabilities): 

Sales returns and allowances (including bad debt)
Inventory reserves 
Deferred rent 
Deferred revenue
Other 
Capitalized software and depreciation 
Total current deferred tax (liabilities) assets 
Less: Valuation allowance 

Net current deferred tax liability(a)
Non-current deferred tax assets and (liabilities): 

Equity compensation
Domestic net operating loss carryforward 
Foreign tax credit carryforward 
Convertible debt 
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards 
Intangible amortization 
Capitalized software and depreciation 
Total non-current deferred tax asset 
Less: Valuation allowance 

Net non-current deferred tax asset (liability)(b)
Deferred taxes, net 

72 

March 31,

2012

2011

$7,017
815
1,843
2,339
14,920
(46,886)
(19,952)
(15,921)
(35,873)

2,574
  166,887
7,680
(26,380)
22,898
(1,867)
(22,511)
149,281
  (118,247)
31,034
  $(4,839)

$4,883
798
3,405
2,741
16,881
(19,706)
9,002
(9,002)
—

2,535
116,652
7,348
(11,380)
11,947
1,100
(25,522)
102,680
(105,641)
(2,961)
$(2,961)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(a) 

(b) 

Included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities as of March 31, 2012. 

Included in other assets as of March 31, 2012 and other long-term liabilities as of March 31, 2011.

The valuation allowance is primarily attributable to net operating losses for which no benefit is provided due to uncertainty 
with  respect  to  their  realization.  The  net  deferred  tax  liability is  primarily  the  result  of  deferred  tax  liabilities  related  t
o
goodwill which cannot be used to offset deferred tax assets. 

f

At March 31, 2012, we had domestic net operating loss carryforwards totaling $428,464, which will begin to expire in 2027.
In  addition,  we  had  foreign  net  operating  loss  carryforwards  of  $194,218,  of  which  $5,840  will  begin  to  expire  in 2013, 
$173,340 will begin to expire in 2016, $1,614 will expire in 2023, and the remainder may be carried forward indefinitely. 

The  total  amount  of  undistributed  earnings  of  foreign  subsidiaries  was  approximately  $151,400  at  March 31,  2012  and 
$200,900  at  March 31,  2011.  It  is  our  intention  to  reinvest  undistributed  earnings  of  our  foreign  subsidiaries  and  thereby 
indefinitely  postpone  their  remittance.  Accordingly,  no  provision  has  been  made  for  foreign  withholding  taxes  or  U.S.
income taxes which may become payable if undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries are repatriated. It is not practicable
to estimate the tax liability that would arise if these earnings were remitted. 

We  are  regularly  audited  by  domestic  and  foreign  taxing  authorities.  Audits  may  result  in  tax  assessments  in  excess  of 
amounts claimed and the payment of additional taxes. We believe that our tax return positions comply with applicable tax 
le  assessments  of  additional  taxes.  Additionally,  we
law  and  that  we  have  adequately  provided for  reasonably  foreseeab
believe  that  any  assessments  in  excess  of  the  amounts  provided  for  will  not  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  the
Consolidated Financial Statements. 

d

As  of  March 31,  2012  and 2011,  we  had  gross  unrecognized  tax  benefits,  including  interest  and  penalties,  of  $22,406  and 
$15,091, respectively, all of which would affect our effective tax rate if realized.

The aggregate changes to the liability for gross uncertain tax positions, excludi

a

ng interest and penalties, were as follows:

Balance, beginning of period 
Additions:

Current year tax positions
Prior year tax positions

Reduction of prior year tax positions 
Settlements
Lapse of statute of limitations 
Other, net 
Balance, end of period

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2010
2011
2012
(Unaudited)
$13,182 

$9,195

$13,352

1,741
5,805
—
—
(750)
180

1,077
4,097

6,318 
2,237 
— (6,034) 
— (7,033) 
— 
525 
$9,195 

(1,273)
256
$20,328 $13,352

Five Months
Ended
March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year
Ended 
October 31,
2009

$18,423

$18,412

1,942
—
(4,350)
(6,487)
—
(333)
$9,195

5,630
3,316
(4,013)
(4,762)
—
(160)
$18,423

We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes in our Consolidated
Statements  of  Operations.  For  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2012  and 2011,  we  recognized  an  increase  in  interest  and 
penalties  of  approximately  $339  and  $5, respectively.  For  the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2010,  five  months  ended 
March 31, 2010 and fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, we recognized a decrease in interest and penalties of approximately 
$2,507, $4,480 and $1,773, respectively. The gross amount of interest and penalties accrued as of March 31, 2012 and 2011 
was approximately $2,078 and $1,739, respectively.

We  are  generally  no  longer  subject  to  audit  for  U.S.  federal  income  tax  returns  for  periods  prior  to  our  fiscal  year  ended 
October 31,  2008  and  state  income  tax  returns  for  periods  prior  to  the  fiscal  year  ended  October 31,  2004.  With  few 
exceptions, we are no longer subject to income tax examinations in non-U.S. jurisdictions for years prior to our fiscal year 
ended October 31, 2005. U.S. federal taxing authorities have completed examinations of our income tax returns through the
fiscal years ended October 31, 2006 and commenced their audit of fiscal years ending October 31, 2008 and 2009. Certain
U.S. state taxing authorities are currently examining our income tax returns for fiscal years ending October 31, 2004 through 
October 31,  2006.  In  addition,  tax  authorities  in  certain  non-U.S.  jurisdictions  are  currently  examining  our  income  tax 
returns. The determination as to further adjustments to our gross unrecognized tax benefits during the next 12 months is not 
practicable.

73 

 
 
 
We believe that we have provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to our tax audits and that any settlement 
will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. However, there can be no assurances as to
the possible outcomes. 

15. 

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION 

Our  stock-based  compensation  plans  are  broad-based,  long-term  retention  programs  intended  to  attract  and  retain  talented 
employees and align stockholder and employee interests. For similar reasons, we also granted non-employee equity awards, 
which are subject to variable accounting, to ZelnickMedia in connection with their contract to provide executive management 
services to us. We began replacing stock option awards with restricted stock awards during the fiscal year ended October 31, 
2007. We issue shares to employees on the date the restricted stock is granted and therefore shares granted have voting rights,
participate in dividends and are considered issued and outstanding. 

d

In April 2009, our stockholders approved our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”). The aggregate number of shares 
issuable under this plan is 6,409,000, representing 4,900,000 new shares available for grant approved by our stockholders and 
1,509,000 shares allocated from the Incentive Stock Plan and 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “2002 Plan”). In April 2010, our 
stockholders  approved  an  amendment  to the  2009  Plan  to  increase  the  available  shares  for  issuance  by  2,750,000.  In
September 2011, our stockholders approved Amendment No. 2 to the 2009 Plan to increase the available shares for issuance 
by  5,000,000.  The  2009  Plan  is  administered  by  the  Compensation  Committee  of  the  Board  of  Directors  and  allows  for 
awards  of  restricted  stock,  deferred  stock  and  other  stock-based  awards  of  our  common  stock  to  employees  and  non-
employees. As of March 31, 2012, there were approximately 4,366,000 shares available for issuance under the 2009 Plan. 

In April 2008, our stockholders approved an increase to the number of shares available for grant under the Incentive Stock 
Plan from 4,500,000 to 6,500,000. The Incentive Stock Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of 
Directors  and  allows  for  awards  of  restricted  stock,  deferred  stock  and  other  stock-based  awards  of  our  common  stock  to
employees and non-employees. As of March 31, 2012, there were no shares available for issuance under the Incentive Stock 
Plan.

In June 2002, our stockholders approved our 2002 Plan, as previously adopted by our Board of Directors, pursuant to which 
officers, directors, employees and consultants may receive options to purchase shares of our common stock. The aggregate
amount of shares issuable under the 2002 Plan was 11,000,000 shares. As of March 31, 2012, there were no shares available
for issuance under the 2002 Plan. 

f

Subject to the provisions of the plans, the Board of Directors or any Committee appointed by the Board of Directors, has the
authority to determine the individuals to whom the equity awards are to be granted, the number of shares to be covered by 
each equity award, the vesting period, restrictions, if any, on the equity award, the terms and conditions of the equity award.

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense resulting from stock options and restricted stock included 
in our Consolidated Statements of Operations:

Cost of goods sold 
Selling and marketing 
General and administrative
Research and development 
Stock-based compensation expense 
Capitalized stock-based compensation expense
Total stock-based compensation expense

2011

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2010
2012
(Unaudited)
$5,213
3,321
14,319
3,650
26,503
13,521
$40,024

$5,144 $10,695
4,659
5,042
9,781
19,963
3,630
3,345
28,765
33,494
11,266
11,220
$44,714 $40,031

Five Months 
Ended March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year
Ended October 31,
2009

$2,152 
1,492 
4,908 
1,927 
10,479 
4,617 
$15,096 

$6,094
2,551
14,119
3,169
25,933
11,413
$37,346

During  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31, 2012,  2011  and 2010,  five  months  ended  March 31,  2010  and  fiscal  year  ended 
October 31,  2009,  we  recorded  $13,365,  $3,159,  $6,456,  $1,588  and  $6,502,  respectively,  of  stock-  based  compensation
expense for non-employee awards, which was included in general and administrative expenses. 

We capitalize and amortize stock-based compensation awards in accordance with our software development cost accounting 
policy.

74 

 
 
 
Restricted Stock 

Restricted stock awards granted to employees under our stock-based compensation plans generally vest over 3 years from the
date of grant. Certain restricted stock awards granted to key officers, senior-level employees, and key employees vest based 
on market conditions, primarily related to the performance of the price of our common stock.

In  June 2008, pursuant  to  an  amendment  to  our  Management  Agreement,  we granted  600,000  shares  of restricted stock  to
ZelnickMedia that vested annually over a three year period and 900,000 shares of market-based restricted stock that vest over 
a  four  year  period  through 2012,  provided  that  the  Company’s  Total  Shareholder  Return  (as  defined  in  the  relevant  grant 
agreements)  is  at  or  higher  than  the  75th percentile  of  the  NASDAQ  Industrial  Index measured  annually  on  a  cumulative
basis.  For  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2012,  2011  and 2010 and  fiscal  year  ended  October 31,  2009,  we  recorded 
expenses of $499, $1,594, $2,467 and $2,534, respectively, and for the five months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded a 
benefit of $104 of stock- based compensation (a component of general and administrative expenses) related to these grants of 
restricted stock. 

In addition, pursuant to the New Management Agreement, we granted 1,100,000 shares of restricted stock to ZelnickMedia 
that will vest annually through April 1, 2015 and 1,650,000 shares of market-based restricted stock that vest through April 1, 
2015, provided that the price of our common stock outperforms 75% of the companies in the NASDAQ Composite Index 
measured annually on a cumulative basis. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, we recorded an expense of $12,866 of 
stock-based compensation (a component of general and administrative expenses) related to these grants of restricted stock.

We measure the fair value of our market-based awards to employees and non-employees usin
g the Monte Carlo Simulation 
method, which takes into account assumptions such as the expected volatility of our common stock, the risk-free interest rate
based  on  the  contractual  term  of  the  award,  expected  dividend  yield,  vesting  schedule  and  the  probability  that  the  market 
conditions of the award will be achieved. The estimated value of market-based restricted stock awards granted to employees
during  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31, 2012,  2011  and 2010,  five  months  ended  March 31,  2010  and  fiscal  year  ended 
October 31, 2009 was $16.29, $15.36, $8.96, $9.25 and $6.00 per share, respectively.

mm

Each  reporting  period,  we  remeasure  the  fair  value  of  the  unvested  portion  of  the  market-based  restricted  stock  awards 
granted  to  ZelnickMedia  during  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 31,  2012  and  October 31,  2008.  For  the  fiscal  year  ended 
March 31, 2012, the estimated value of the awards granted to ZelnickMedia during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 was 
$12.10 per share. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, five months ended March 31, 2010 and fiscal
year  ended  October 31,  2009,  the  estimated  value  of  the  awards  granted  to  ZelnickMedia  during  the  fiscal  year  ended 
October 31, 2008 was $0.02, $1.11, $3.20, $2.58 and $4.67 per share, respectively.

The following table summarizes the weighted-average assumptions used in the Monte Carlo Simulation method:

Risk-free interest rate 
Expected stock price volatility
Expected service period (years) 
Dividends

Risk-free interest rate 
Expected stock price volatility 
Expected service period (years) 
Dividends 

March 31, 2012

Fiscal Year Ended
March 31, 2011

March 31, 2010

Employee
Market-Based
0.4%
58.2%
2.0
None

Non-Employee
Market-Based
0.4%
46.3%
3.1
None

Employee
Market-Based
1.4%
52.6%
2.0
None

Non-Employee
Market-Based
0.5% 
55.0% 
4.0 
None 

Employee
Market-Based
1.6%
58.0%
2.0
None

Non-Employee
Market-Based
1.4%
66.4%
3.3
None

Five Months Ended
March 31, 2010

Fiscal Year Ended 
October 31, 2009

Employee
Market-Based
1.6%
57.2%
2.0
None

Non-Employee
Market-Based

1.1%
69.2%
3.5
None

Employee
Market-Based
1.2% 
60.8% 
2.0 
None 

Non-Employee
Market-Based

1.5%
61.4%
2.9
None

The following table summarizes the activity in non-vested restricted stock awarded to employees and ZelnickMedia under 
our stock-based compensation plans: 

75 

Non-vested restricted stock at March 31, 2011 
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Non-vested restricted stock at March 31, 2012

Shares
(in thousands)

Weighted
Average Fair 
Value on 
Grant Date

5,118 
2,970 
(2,439) 
(102)
5,547 

$9.68
13.27
10.77
11.27
$11.06

As of March 31, 2012, the total future unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to outstanding 
unvested restricted stock was approximately $37,911 and will be recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis
over the remaining vesting period, or capitalized as software development costs.

Stock Options

As of March 31, 2012, all of the outstanding stock options are exercisable and expire at various times through the fiscal year
ending March 31, 2018. Options granted generally vested over a period of three to four years and expire within a period of 
five to ten years.

Pursuant  to  the  Management  Agreement,  in  August 2007,  we  issued  stock  options  to  ZelnickMedia  to  acquire  2,009,075
shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $14.74 per share, which vested over 36 months and expire 10 years from 
the  date  of  grant.  Each  month,  we  remeasured  the  fair  value  of  the  unvested  portion  of  such  options  and  recorded 
compensation  expense  for  the  difference  between  total  earned  compensation  at  the  end  of  the  period  and  total  earned 
compensation at the beginning of the period. As a result, changes in the price of our common stock affected compensation
expense or benefit recognized from period to period. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, five months ended 
March 31,  2010  and  fiscal  year  ended  October 31,  2009,  we  recorded  $1,565,  $3,989,  $1,692  and  $3,968,  respectively,  of 
stock-based compensation related to this option grant.

The following table summarizes the activity in stock options awarded to employees and ZelnickMedia under our stock-based 
compensation plans and also includes non-plan options:

(options in thousands)
Outstanding at beginning of period 

Exercised 
Forfeited

Outstanding at end of period
Exercisable at period-end
Remaining weighted average contractual life

of options exercisable (years)

Fiscal Year Ended

March 31, 2012

March 31, 2011

Five Months Ended
March 31, 2010

Fiscal Year Ended
October 31, 2009

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Options
Price
3,514
$15.37
(65)
10.96
19.52 (1,132)
2,317
$15.16
2,317
$15.16

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$18.17
11.30
24.30
$15.37
$15.37

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Options
Price
$18.45  4,347
(2)
— 
(542)
21.89
$18.17  3,803
$18.43  3,133

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$18.92
10.42
22.24
$18.45
$19.08

Options
3,803 
— 
(289)
3,514
3,183 

Options
2,317
(22)
(131)
2,164
2,164

5.0

5.7

4.3 

4.1

The total estimated fair value of options vested during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, five months ended 
March 31, 2010 and fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 was $1,880, $5,225, $1,928 and $7,848, respectively.

The  following  summarizes  information  about  stock  options  outstanding  and  exercisable  at  March 31,  2012  (options  in
thousands):

Options Outstanding and Exercisable 

Exercise Price Ranges
To

From

$14.74 
20.51

$14.74 
20.80

Weighted 
Average
Remaining 
Contractual 
Life (years)

5.4 
0.1 
5.0 

Weighted 
Average 
Exercise 
Price

$14.74
20.59
15.16

Aggregate 
Intrinsic
Value

$1,296

Number of 
Options

2,009
155
2,164

76 

 
 
 
 
 
The  fair  value  of  our  stock  options  was  estimated  using  the Black-Scholes  option-pricing  model.  This  model  requires  the
input of assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables that would usually have a significant effect on
the fair value estimate. These variables included, but were not limited to, the volatility of our common stock price, the current 
market price of our common stock, the risk-free interest rate and expected exercise term. The following table summarizes the 
weighted average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value outstanding stock options awarded to
ZelnickMedia in August 2007 and employee stock options, which were last granted during the fiscal year ended October 31, 
2007: 

Risk-free interest rate 
Expected stock price volatility 
Expected term until exercise (years) 
Dividends 

Valuation Assumptions 

Fiscal Year Ended
March 31,

2010

2011
3.4% 3.4%
57.2% 62.3%
8.0
None

7.3
None

Five Months
Ended March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year Ended 
October 31,
2009

3.6% 
59.6% 
7.7 
None 

3.2%
67.4%
8.4
None

Generally,  our  assumptions  are  based  on  historical  information  and  judgment  is  required  to  determine  if  historical  trends 
could be indicators of future outcomes. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, five months ended March,
31, 2010 and fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, we estimated stock price volatility of all stock-based compensation awards 
d
using  a  combination  of  historical  volatility  and  implied  volatility  for  publicly  traded  options  on  our  common  stock.  In 
addition, stock-based compensation expense is calculated based on the number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest,
and  therefore  are  reduced  for  estimated  forfeitures.  Our  estimate  of  expected  forfeitures  is  based  on  our  historical  annual 
forfeiture rate of 5%. The estimated forfeiture rate, which is evaluated at each balance sheet date throughout the life of the
award, provides a time-based adjustment of forfeited shares. The estimated forfeiture rate is reassessed at each balance sheet 
date and may have changed based on new facts and circumstances. 

16. 

SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 

We  operate  in  one  reportable  segment  in  which  we  are  a  publisher  of  interactive software  games  designed  for  console
systems,  handheld gaming  systems  and personal  computers, including smart  phones and  tablets,  and  are delivered  through 
physical  retail,  digital  download,  online platforms  and  cloud  streaming  services.  Our  reporting  segment  is  based  upon  our 
internal  organizational  structure,  the  manner  in  which  our  operations  are  managed  and  the  criteria  used  by  our  Chief 
Executive  Officer,  our  chief  operating  decision  maker  (“CODM”)  to  evaluate  performance.  The  Company’s  operations 
involve similar  products  and customers  worldwide. We  are  centrally  managed  and  the CODM primarily  uses  consolidated 
financial  information  supplemented  by  sales  information  by  product  category,  major  product  title  and  platform  to  make
operational decisions and assess financial performance. Our business consists of our Rockstar Games and 2K labels which 
have  been  aggregated  into  a  single  reportable  segment  (the  “publishing  segment”)  based  upon  their  similar  economic 
characteristics,  products  and distribution  methods.  Revenue  earned from  our publishing  segment  is  primarily  derived  from 
the sale of internally developed software titles and software titles developed on our behalf by third-parties.

a

We  attribute  net  revenue  to  geographic  regions  based  on  product  destination.  Net  revenue  by geographic  region  was  as 
follows: 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,

Net revenue by geographic region:

2012

2011

United States
Europe 
Asia Pacific
Canada and Latin America 
Total net revenue

$449,189
246,260
68,601
61,773

$619,731
364,017
81,652
71,476
$825,823 $1,136,876

2010
(Unaudited)

$454,805
207,305
44,764
56,067
$762,941

Five Months
Ended March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year
Ended October 31,
2009

$231,357 
77,550 
18,474 
31,850 
$359,231

$400,674
218,195
43,185
39,003
$701,057

77 

 
 
 
Net revenue by product platform was as follows:

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,

Net revenue by product platform:

2012

2011

Microsoft Xbox 360 
Sony PlayStation 3 
PC and other 
Nintendo Wii 
Sony PSP 
Nintendo DS 
Sony PlayStation 2
Total net revenue

17. 

INTEREST AND OTHER, NET

$370,032
300,530
87,318
19,700
18,521
16,796
12,926

$454,362
442,115
110,511
57,148
21,676
30,735
20,329
$825,823 $1,136,876

2010
(Unaudited)
$350,754
159,097
70,814
61,774
46,240
32,392
41,870
$762,941

Five Months 
Ended March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year
Ended October 31,
2009

$163,826 
87,019 
33,119 
30,672 
15,644 
12,935 
16,016 
$359,231

$283,094
113,117
81,866
76,543
51,716
45,823
48,898
$701,057

Interest income (expense), net 
Gain (loss) on sale
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) 
Other 
Interest and other, net 

$(20,616) $(15,248)
(106)
1,414
421
$(19,571) $(13,519)

2,200
(1,311)
156

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2011

2012

Five Months 
Ended March 31,
2010

Fiscal Year
Ended October 31,
2009

$(6,461) 
(3,831) 
(704) 
(356)
$(11,352)

$(9,611)
—
4,289
(449)
$(5,771)

2010
(Unaudited)
$(13,584)
(3,831)
(609)
(770)
$(18,794)

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, we sold certain intellectual property assets for $2,200 in cash and additional
contingent royalties, resulting in a gain on sale of $2,200. The disposition did not involve a significant amount of assets or 
materially affect our operating results. 

During the fiscal year and five months ended March 31, 2010, we sold the shares of our wholly-owned Italian subsidiary for 
approximately $6,072 in cash and notes receivable resulting in a loss on sale of approximately $3,831. The disposition of our 
Italian subsidiary did not involve a significant amount of assets or materially affect our operating results. 

78 

18. 

SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following table provides details of our valuation and qualifying accounts:

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2012
Valuation allowance for deferred income taxes
Sales returns, price protection and other allowances
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Total accounts receivable allowances
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2011
Valuation allowance for deferred income taxes 
Sales returns, price protection and other allowances 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Total accounts receivable allowances 
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2010 (Unaudited)
Valuation allowance for deferred income taxes 
Sales returns, price protection and other allowances 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Total accounts receivable allowances 
Five Months Ended March 31, 2010
Valuation allowance for deferred income taxes 
Sales returns, price protection and other allowances 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Total accounts receivable allowances 
Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2009
Valuation allowance for deferred income taxes 
Sales returns, price protection and other allowances 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Total accounts receivable allowances 

Beginning
Balance

Additions(1)

Deductions

Other

Ending
Balance

$114,643
$42,104
796
$42,900

$141,231
$71,764
771
$72,535

$116,177
$39,868
5,878
$45,746

$130,024
$35,330
1,861
$37,191

$104,305
$54,718
4,044
$58,762

19,525
$119,462
—
$119,462

—
$(110,085) 
(84)
$(110,169) 

— $134,168
$50,290
712
$51,002

$(1,191)
—
$(1,191)

—
$90,119
43
$90,162

25,054
$87,305
(882)
$86,423

11,207
$64,946
(1,010)
$63,936

25,719
$70,527
1,988
$72,515

(26,588) 
$(119,356) 
(32)
$(119,388) 

— $114,643
$42,104
796
$42,900

$(423)
14
$(409)

—
$(55,400) 
(4,819)
$(60,219) 

— $141,231
$71,764
771
$72,535

$(9)
594
$585

—
$(27,132) 
—
$(27,389) 

— $141,231
$71,764
771
$72,535

$(1,380)
(80)
$(1,460)

—
$(89,621) 
(4,819)
$(94,440) 

— $130,024
$35,330
1,861
$37,191

$(294)
648
$354

(1) 

Includes price concessions of $85,977, $59,894, $61,147, $53,237 and $49,354; returns of $9,608, $8,721, $19,940,
$10,653  and  $12,592;  and  other  sales  allowances  including  rebates,  discounts  and  cooperative  advertising  of 
$23,877, $21,504, $6,218, $1,056 and $8,581 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, five months 
r
ended March 31, 2010 and fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, respectively. 

79 

19. 

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) 

The  following  tables  set  forth  quarterly  supplementary  data  for  each  of  the  years  in  the  two-year  period  ended  March 31, 
2012: 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2012

Net revenue 

Product costs 
Software development costs and royalties 
Internal royalties 
Licenses 

Cost of goods sold 
Gross profit 

Selling and marketing 
General and administrative 
Research and development 
Depreciation and amortization 

Total operating expenses 
Income (loss) from operations 
Interest and other, net 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 
Income (loss) from continuing operations 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes 
Net income (loss) 

Earnings (loss) per share: 
Continuing operations 
Discontinued operations 
Basic earnings (loss) per share 
Continuing operations 
Discontinued operations 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share 

First
$334,380
98,451
84,602
16,512
11,654
211,219
123,161
74,683
30,577
16,519
3,245
125,024
(1,863)
(3,680)
(5,543)
3,076
(8,619)
(94)
$(8,713)

$(0.11)
—
$(0.11)
$(0.11)
—
$(0.11)

Quarter 

Second
$107,034 
40,137 
17,248 
6,579 
10,739 
74,703 
32,331 
28,773 
25,785 
15,998 
3,284 
73,840 
(41,509) 
(4,333) 
(45,842) 
1,419 
(47,261) 
(110) 
$(47,371) 

Third
  $236,325
68,803
27,236
9,907
20,521
  126,467
  109,858
40,228
29,705
16,823
2,854
89,610
20,248
(6,190)
14,058
(127)
14,185
(81)
  $14,104

$(0.57) 
— 
$(0.57) 
$(0.57) 
— 
$(0.57) 

$0.16
—
$0.16
$0.16
—
$0.16

Fourth
$148,084
47,845
35,401
1,158
32,062
116,466
31,618
40,065
35,133
14,822
2,740
92,760
(61,142)
(5,368)
(66,510)
(505)
(66,005)
(831)
$(66,836)

$(0.78)
(0.01)
$(0.79)
$(0.78)
(0.01)
$(0.79)

80 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2011

Net revenue 

Product costs 
Software development costs and royalties 
Internal royalties 
Licenses 

Cost of goods sold 
Gross profit 

Selling and marketing 
General and administrative 
Research and development 
Depreciation and amortization 

Total operating expenses 
Income (loss) from operations 
Interest and other, net 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes 
Provision for income taxes 
Income (loss) from continuing operations 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes 
Net income (loss) 

Earnings (loss) per share: 
Continuing operations 
Discontinued operations 
Basic earnings (loss) per share 
Continuing operations 
Discontinued operations 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share 

First
$375,390
101,077
64,038
67,462
11,469
244,046
131,344
49,805
26,202
16,181
3,765
95,953
35,391
(4,738)
30,653
3,291
27,362
(1,048)
$26,314

$0.32
(0.01)
$0.31
$0.31
(0.01)
$0.30

Quarter

Second
$244,972 
67,026 
44,592 
15,803 
9,221 
136,642 
108,330 
46,602 
26,620 
18,074 
4,005 
95,301 
13,029 
(1,644) 
11,385 
3,347 
8,038 
(4,699) 
$3,339 

Third
  $334,259
98,067
40,276
22,001
28,306
  188,650
  145,609
47,861
27,492
18,073
3,501
96,927
48,682
(4,013)
44,669
3,849
40,820
39
  $40,859

$0.09 
(0.05) 
$0.04 
$0.09 
(0.05) 
$0.04 

$0.47
—
$0.47
$0.45
—
$0.45

Fourth
$182,255
60,766
23,491
9,766
26,020
120,043
62,212
32,026
29,170
17,248
3,728
82,172
(19,960)
(3,124)
(23,084)
(668)
(22,416)
362
$(22,054)

$(0.27)
—
$(0.27)
$(0.27)
—
$(0.27)

Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of 
quarterly basic and diluted earnings per share information may not equal annual basic and diluted earnings per share. 

aa

81 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SIGNATURES 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Ac
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. 

f

t
t of 1934 the registrant has duly caused this

TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.

By: 

/s/ STRAUSS ZELNICK
Strauss Zelnick 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 

May 22, 2012 

Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of 1934,  this  report  has  been
persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the date indicated.

f

signed  below  by  the  following

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ STRAUSS ZELNICK
Strauss Zelnick 

/s/ LAINIE GOLDSTEIN
Lainie Goldstein 

/s/ MICHAEL DORNEMANN
Michael Dornemann 

/s/ ROBERT A. BOWMAN
Robert A. Bowman 

/s/ SUNGHWAN CHO
SungHwan Cho 

/s/ BRETT ICAHN
Brett Icahn

/s/ J MOSES
J Moses

/s/ JAMES L. NELSON
James L. Nelson

/s/ MICHAEL SHERESKY
Michael Sheresky 

Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer) 

May 22, 2012

Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) 

May 22, 2012

Lead Independent Director 

May 22, 2012 

Director 

Director 

Director 

Director 

Director 

Director 

May 22, 2012

May 22, 2012

May 22, 2012

May 22, 2012

May 22, 2012

May 22, 2012

82 

 
 
 
 
Name 

North America Subsidiaries:
2K Games, Inc. 
2K Marin, Inc. 
2K Play, Inc. 
2Ksports, Inc. 
Cat Daddy Games L.L.C. 
Firaxis Games, Inc. 
Gathering of Developers, Inc. 
Irrational Games, LLC 
Kush Games, Inc. 
Rockstar Games, Inc. 
Rockstar New England, Inc. 
Rockstar San Diego, Inc. 
Rockstar Toronto Inc. 
Rockstar Vancouver Inc. 
Take 2 Productions, Inc. 
Take-Two Licensing, Inc. 
Take-Two Interactive Canada, Inc. 
Visual Concepts Entertainment 
WC Holdco, Inc. 

International Subsidiaries:
2K Australia Pty. Ltd. 
2K Czech a.s. 
2K Games (Chengdu) Co., Ltd. 
2K Games (Hangzhou) Co. Ltd. 
2K Games (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 
Maxcorp Ltd. 
Rockstar Leeds Ltd. 
Rockstar Lincoln, Ltd. 
Rockstar London, Ltd. 
Rockstar North Ltd. 
Take-Two Great Britain Ltd. 
Take-Two Asia Pte. Ltd. 
Take-Two Interactive Austria GmbH 
Take-Two Interactive Benelux B.V. 
Take-Two Interactive Espana S.L. 
Take-Two Interactive France SAS 
Take-Two Interactive Korea Ltd. 
Take-Two Interactive Software Europe Ltd 
Take-Two Interactive Software Pty. Ltd. 
Take-Two Interactive GmbH 
Take-Two International SA 
Take-Two Interactive Japan G.K. 

Subsidiaries of the Company

Exhibit 21.1

Jurisdiction of Incorporation 

Delaware 
Delaware 
Delaware 
Delaware 
Washington 
Delaware
Texas
Delaware 
California 
Delaware 
Delaware
Virginia 
Canada 
Canada 
Delaware 
Delaware
Canada 
California
New York 

Australia
Czech Republic
China
China 
China 
Bermuda 
United Kingdom 
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom 
Singapore
Austria 
Netherlands
Spain 
France 
Korea 
United Kingdom 
Australia
Germany
Switzerland 
Japan

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 File No.’s, 333-158735, 333-177822 
and Form S-3 File No. 333-159499) of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., of our reports dated May 22, 2012, with respect 
to the consolidated financial statements of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) 
for the year ended March 31, 2012 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Take-Two Interactive 
Software, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Exhibit 23.1

New York, New York 

May 22, 2012 

TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
Section 302 Certification

Exhibit 31.1

I, Strauss Zelnick, certify that: 

   1. 
“registrant”);

I  have  reviewed  this  Annual  Report  on  Form 10-K  of  Take-Two  Interactive  Software, Inc.  (the

   2. 

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state 
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, 
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

   3. 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report; 

    4. 

The  registrant’s  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure
controls  and  procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rules 13a-15(e)  and 15d-15(e))  and  internal  control  over  financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

    a) 

designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or  caused  such  disclosure  controls  and 
procedures  to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared; 

    b) 

designed  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  or  caused  such  internal  control  over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of 
financial  reporting  and  the  preparation of  financial  statements  for  external  purposes  in  accordance  with  generally 
accepted accounting principles; 

aa

   c) 

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this  report  our  conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of  the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  as  of  the  end  of  the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

   d) 

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that 
occurred  during  the  registrant’s  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the  registrant’s  fourth  fiscal  quarter  in  the  case  of  an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the  registrant’s  internal 
control over financial reporting; and 

   5. 

The  registrant’s  other  certifying  officer  and  I  have  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of 
internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  to  the  registrant’s auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  the  registrant’s  board  of 
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

   a) 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control 
over  financial  reporting  which  are  reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant’s  ability  to  record,  process, 
summarize and report financial information; and 

   b) 

Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have  a 

significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

May 22, 2012 

/s/ STRAUSS ZELNICK
Strauss Zelnick 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
Section 302 Certification 

Exhibit 31.2

I, Lainie Goldstein, certify that: 

   1. 
“registrant”);

I  have  reviewed  this  Annual  Report  on  Form 10-K  of  Take-Two  Interactive  Software, Inc.  (the

   2. 

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

    3. 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report; 

   4. 

The  registrant’s  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure
controls  and  procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rules 13a-15(e)  and 15d-15(e))  and  internal  control  over  financial 
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

   a) 

designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or  caused  such  disclosure  controls  and 
procedures  to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material information  relating  to  the  registrant, 
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the 
period in which this report is being prepared;

   b) 

designed  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  or  caused  such  internal  control  over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of 
financial  reporting  and  the  preparation of  financial  statements  for  external  purposes  in  accordance  with  generally 
accepted accounting principles;

    c) 

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in 
this  report  our  conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of  the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  as  of  the  end  of  the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

    d) 

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that 
occurred  during  the  registrant’s  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the  registrant’s  fourth  fiscal  quarter  in  the  case  of  an 
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the  registrant’s  internal
control over financial reporting; and 

    5. 

The  registrant’s  other  certifying  officer  and  I  have  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of 
internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  to  the  registrant’s auditors  and  the  audit  committee of  the  registrant’s  board  of 
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a) 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over  financial  reporting  which  are  reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant’s  ability  to  record,  process, 
summarize and report financial information; and 

    b) 

Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have  a 

significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

May 22, 2012 

/s/ LAINIE GOLDSTEIN
Lainie Goldstein 
Chief Financial Officer

TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

EXHIBIT 32.1

In connection with the Annual Report of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period 
ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Strauss 
Zelnick, as Chariman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted 
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 

(2) 

May 22, 2012 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act 
of 1934; and 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and 
results of operations of the Company.

/s/ STRAUSS ZELNICK
Strauss Zelnick 
Chariman and Chief Executive Officer

TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

EXHIBIT 32.2

In connection with the Annual Report of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period 
ended  March 31,  2012  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  “Report”),  I, Lainie 
Goldstein,  as Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to 
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) 

(2) 

May 22, 2012 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act 
of 1934; and 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and 
results of operations of the Company.

/s/ LAINIE GOLDSTEIN
Lainie Goldstein 
Chief Financial Officer 

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

OFFICERS

CORPORATE OFFICES

CORPORATE INFORMATION

STRAUSS ZELNICK
Chairman and 
Chief Executive Offi cer

LAINIE GOLDSTEIN 
Chief Financial Offi cer

KARL SLATOFF 
Chief Operating Offi cer

SETH KRAUSS 
Executive Vice President and 
General Counsel

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

STRAUSS ZELNICK
Chairman

MICHAEL DORNEMANN
Lead Independent Director

ROBERT BOWMAN
SUNGHWAN CHO
BRETT ICAHN
J  MOSES
JAMES L. NELSON
MICHAEL SHERESKY

CORPORATE 
HEADQUARTERS

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
622 Broadway
New York, NY 10012
(646) 536-2842

STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION
A copy of the Company’s Annual 
Report on Form 10-K, as fi led with 
the Securities and Exchange 
Commission, will be furnished 
without charge upon written 
request to Investor Relations at 
the Corporate Headquarters.

Take-Two Interactive 
Software Europe, Ltd.
Saxon House
2-4 Victoria Street
Windsor, Berkshire SL4 1EN

Take-Two Pte Ltd.
47 Scotts Road
#11-01 Goldbell Towers
Singapore 228233

PRINCIPAL OPERATING OFFICES

Rockstar Games, Inc.
622 Broadway
New York, NY 10012

2K Games, Inc.
2K Sports, Inc.
2K Play, Inc.
10 Hamilton Landing
Novato, CA 94949

INVESTOR RELATIONS
IR@take2games.com

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Ernst & Young LLP
5 Times Square
New York, NY 10036

TRANSFER AGENT
American Stock Transfer 
& Trust Company, LLC 
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219

COMMON STOCK INFORMATION
The Company’s common 
stock is listed on the NASDAQ 
Global Select Market under 
the symbol TTWO.

www.take2games.com

C
Y
N

,

n
g
i
s
e
D

I

G
F
y
b
d
e
c
u
d
o
r
P
d
n
a
d
e
n
g
i
s
e
D

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.
622 Broadway
New York, NY 10012
(646) 536-2842
www.take2games.com