Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

tlm · ASX Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker tlm
Exchange ASX
Sector Basic Materials
Industry
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2016 Annual Report · Talisman Mining Limited
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Building Opportunity and 
Diversity in Copper and Nickel

Annual  

Report 

■  CORPORATE DIRECTORY

DIRECTORS
Mr Jeremy Kirkwood  Non-Executive Chairman
Mr Daniel Madden 
Mr Alan Senior 
Mr Brian Dawes 
Ms Karen Gadsby 

Managing Director
Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director

COMPANY SECRETARY
Mr Shaun Vokes
Mr Alex Neuling

REGISTERED & PRINCIPAL OFFICE
Ground Floor, 6 Centro Avenue
Subiaco, Western Australia 6008
Telephone +61 8 9380 4230
Facsimile +61 8 9382 8200
Website: www.talismanmining.com.au

AUDITORS

HLB Mann Judd
Level 4, 130 Stirling Street
Perth, Western Australia 6000
Telephone +61 8 9227 7500
Facsimile +61 8 9227 7533

SHARE REGISTRY
Link Market Services
Level 4, Central Park
152 St Georges Terrace
Perth, Western Australia 6000
Telephone 1300 554 474

SECURITIES EXCHANGE LISTING
Australian Securities Exchange Limited
Level 8, Exchange Plaza
2 The Esplanade
Perth, Western Australia 6000
ASX Code: TLM

■  CONTENTS

Letter from the Chairman ......................................................................................................3
Review of Operations ............................................................................................................5
 Tenement Schedule ............................................................................................................ 16
Corporate Governance Statement ...................................................................................... 17
Directors’ Report ................................................................................................................ 18
Remuneration Report ......................................................................................................... 25
Auditor’s Independence Declaration ....................................................................................33
Independent Auditor’s Report .............................................................................................34
Directors’ Declaration .......................................................................................................... 37
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income ............................................................38
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position ......................................................................39
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity .....................................................................40
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows ............................................................................... 41
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements .................................................................. 42
Additional Securities Exchange Information ......................................................................... 74

Page 1

Page 2

 ■ LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN

Dear Shareholder,

The 2016 financial year has been an active and progressive year for Talisman delivering a maiden copper-gold mineral resource 
together with the continuation of focused exploration programs in a challenging global base metals price environment.

In April 2016 Talisman’s partner in the Springfield Joint Venture, Sandfire Resources NL, reported the maiden mineral resource 
estimate for the high-grade Monty Copper Gold Deposit. The rapid delineation of this outstanding deposit containing almost 
100,000 tonnes of copper and 55,000 ounces of gold within nine months of its discovery is an excellent result and marked a 
significant milestone for the Springfield Joint Venture and an important breakthrough for the Doolgunna region.

With 99% of the Mineral Resource tonnage classified in the Indicated category, project development studies on the Monty 
Deposit have progressed rapidly. The Joint Venture partners have commenced a feasibility study that aims to maximise the 
value of the deposit through optimising the development pathway. This study is scheduled for completion early in calendar 
2017, and depending on results, a subsequent decision to progress with development will be made in due course.

With an average resource grade of 9.4% Cu and 1.6g/t Au, the Monty deposit stands out as one of the highest grade 
copper deposits discovered globally in decades and provides Talisman with confidence in the exceptional exploration 
potential of the Doolgunna region. Exploration activities on the Springfield Joint Venture tenements have moved beyond the 
immediate Monty Deposit to focus both along the 5km long Monty Trend and more broadly within the Homer and Southern 
Volcanics prospects. Together with Sandfire, we look forward to advancing these work programs and achieving continued 
exploration success.

Over the last twelve months we have also been progressing both on-ground and desktop exploration activities on our 
Sinclair Nickel Project. Re-interpretation of historic data and geophysical surveys were completed which identified a number 
of regional targets. In keeping with the subdued global nickel price outlook, Talisman undertook a focused, targeted 
exploration drill campaign on several targets, successfully intersecting massive nickel sulphides at the Delphi prospect.

These encouraging results of our maiden campaign at Sinclair, support our belief that this region hosts a fertile mineralised 
environment that has the potential to contain significant nickel mineralisation. On this basis, we have developed a 
program of phased, results driven, on-ground exploration activities which builds on our previous success. These activities 
commenced in August 2016 and in combination with continued interpretive work of historic data, will assist us to unlock 
the value of Sinclair.

Whilst we continue to operate in a challenging base metals market for junior resource companies, it was pleasing to 
see strong shareholder support for our March 2016 capital raising. We successfully raised $16.7 million in a heavily 
oversubscribed placement that introduced a new substantial shareholder in Talisman. At financial year end, our cash 
resources of $20.2 million have placed us in a strong position to fund both continued exploration at the Springfield Joint 
Venture and potential near-term development of the Monty Deposit, progress our phased exploration programs at Sinclair 
and continue to pursue quality opportunities.

We have also seen a number of Board and management changes during the year. Alan Senior served the Company 
excellently as Chairman for eight years and stepped down from that role in April this year but remains a Non-Executive 
Director. On behalf of shareholders, I thank him sincerely for his contribution as Chairman. Gary Lethridge resigned as 
Managing Director on the 31 March after seven years in the role. Gary led the Company successfully through significant 
changes and challenges and on behalf of the Company, I thank him for his service. I joined the Board on 1 April this year 
and was elected Chairman and Daniel Madden, previously Talisman’s CFO and Company Secretary, was appointed as 
Managing Director in July 2016. I welcome Dan to the Board and look forward to working with the Board as we continue 
our next phase of growth.

On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank the Company’s dedicated team of staff and consultants for their efforts and 
achievements during the year and we look forward to their continued hard work and enthusiasm in the new financial year.

Finally, I would also like to acknowledge the continued support of all our shareholders. Your Company is in a strong 
financial position as we move forward to grow our business and extract value from our outstanding asset base.

Yours faithfully

Jeremy Kirkwood
Chairman

Page 3

TALISMAN MINING LTDPage 4

 ■ REVIEW OF OPERATIONS
 ■ REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW
The past twelve months have seen significant advancement of the Company’s Doolgunna Cu-Au Projects including 
the formalisation of a Joint Venture with Sandfire Resources NL, and the release of a maiden JORC 2012 Indicated and 
Inferred mineral resource for the Monty Deposit in April 2016. The Monty Deposit maiden resource was 1.05 million 
tonnes grading 9.4% copper and 1.6g/t gold1 for 99,000 tonnes of contained copper and 55,000 ounces of contained 
gold. Talisman has also completed a detailed, comprehensive review and targeting process and an initial on-ground 
exploration campaign at its 100% owned Sinclair Nickel Project (“Sinclair”) (Figure 1).

Talisman Mining Ltd and Sandfire Resources NL (“Sandfire”, ASX: SFR) formed a 30:70 Joint Venture over the Doolgunna 
Cu-Au Projects (the “Joint Venture”) in December 2015, following Sandfire’s sole funded expenditure of $15 million on the 
Doolgunna Cu-Au Projects.

Following the early discovery of high-grade copper mineralisation by Sandfire, in the third diamond hole completed as part 
of the farm-in agreement in early 2015, the majority of the on-ground exploration work at the Springfield Project was aimed 
at fast-tracking this exceptionally high grade copper-gold discovery towards a JORC 2012 Mineral Resource. Exploration 
activities outside of the current resource envelope at the Monty Copper-Gold Deposit (“Monty”) have been limited to 
regional first-pass air-core drilling aimed at identifying prospective stratigraphy, and a number of discrete isolated reverse 
circulation (“RC”) drill holes to test geochemical anomalies and stratigraphic positions.

Following completion of a regional targeting review process early in the financial year, the Company undertook its maiden 
on-ground exploration program at its 100% owned Sinclair Nickel Project. During the second half of the financial year 
the Company undertook a review and remodelling of remnant and extension nickel mineralisation proximal to the Sinclair 
Mine, along with a reassessment of historic drilling information from near mine and other regional targets. The outcome of 
this work has led to a greater understanding of the geological controls and mineralising environment at Sinclair, and the 
identification of a number of additional stratigraphic target horizons for future testing.

Figure 1: Talisman Project Locations

1  For details relating to the Monty JORC Mineral Resource see Sandfire Resources NL ASX announcement dated 13 April 2016, available on the Sandfire 

and ASX websites.

Page 5

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

DOOLGUNNA CU-AU PROJECTS (JV WITH SANDFIRE RESOURCES NL)
The Doolgunna Cu-Au Projects Joint Venture is between the Company and Sandfire, with Sandfire acting as Joint 
Venture Manager. The Joint Venture encompasses the Springfield and Halloween West Projects which are high quality 
Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (“VMS”) exploration projects in the emerging world class Bryah Basin region of Western 
Australia (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Doolgunna Cu-Au Project Joint Venture – Springfield and Halloween West Project Locations

The discovery of exceptionally high grade copper-gold mineralisation and the subsequent maiden JORC 2012 Mineral 
Resource estimate of 99,000 tonnes of contained copper at Monty, confirmed the significant exploration potential of the 
Doolgunna Region.

In September 2015, Sandfire provided notice that it had sole-funded $10 million of exploration expenditure to earn an initial 
51% interest in Talisman’s Doolgunna Cu-Au Projects. During the December 2015 quarter, Sandfire provided further notice 
that it had sole-funded a further $5 million of exploration expenditure in order to earn an additional 19% interest in the 
Doolgunna Cu-Au Projects. Under the terms of the Joint Venture, Sandfire and Talisman now contribute toward exploration 
expenditure on a 70:30 pro-rata basis.

Page 6

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

SPRINGFIELD PROJECT
(30% Talisman Mining Ltd – Joint Venture with Sandfire Resources NL)

The Springfield Project comprises a 174km2 ground package located approximately 150km north-east of Meekatharra in 
the northern Murchison Goldfields region of Western Australia.

Springfield is 4km directly along strike, to the east from Sandfire’s DeGrussa Copper-Gold mine and hosts the high-grade 
Monty deposit, within one of four corridors that are prospective for VMS style mineralisation. These VMS corridors are 
Monty Trend, Homer Trend, Central Corridor and Southern Volcanics (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Talisman Springfield Project

Field based exploration activities undertaken as part of the farm-in joint venture on the Springfield Project were dominated 
by the resource definition drilling and associated works at Monty and included:

•  air-core, RC and diamond drilling;
•  down-hole and surface geophysical surveys; and
•  geological studies.

Drilling across the Springfield Project area comprised:

Springfield Project Drilling Statistics 

Hole Type

Number of Holes

Total Meters

Air-Core

RC

Diamond

Total:

1,447

54

140

1,641

120,745

15,498

45,392

181,635

Table 1: Springfield Project drilling statistics 1 July 2015 – 30 June 2016

Page 7

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

Monty
The Monty deposit, is located approximately 10km from Sandfire’s DeGrussa Copper-Gold Mine in what was originally 
identified by Talisman as a prospective corridor of volcanic and sedimentary rock sequences with the potential to contain 
DeGrussa style VMS mineralisation.

Key milestones achieved during the year were:

•  Completion of resource definition drilling;
•  Announcement of a maiden JORC Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource;
•  Completion of a high level mining study;
•  Lodgement of a Mining Lease Application ("MLA") for the Monty Copper-Gold Project; and
•  Commencement of a feasibility study by the Joint Venture.

Since the discovery of high grade copper-gold mineralisation in drill hole TLDD0004A in early 2015, the delineation of the 
Monty deposit has been the main focus for the Joint Venture. Throughout resource definition drilling, Monty continued to 
return exceptionally high grade copper/gold results, with some of the better intersections including:

•  TLDD0005 
•  TLDD0010  

•  TLDD0026  

•  TLDD0061 

9.2m @ 11.8% Cu & 2.9g/t Au from 417.0m down-hole;
 10.5m @ 18.9% Cu & 3.1g/t Au from 359.7m down-hole; and  
4.7m @ 12.8% Cu and 2.5g/t Au from 373.6m down-hole;
 7.3 metres grading 6.2% Cu and 2.8g/t Au from 325.6m down-hole; and 
21.6 metres grading 34.4% Cu and 0.4g/t Au from 339.4m down-hole;
 25.8 metres grading 24.1% Cu and 0.5g/t Au from 299.0m down-hole including a bornite rich 
zone of 8.5 metres grading 41.8% Cu and 0.5 g/t Au from 315.4m down-hole.

On the 13th of April 2016, Sandfire and Talisman jointly announced a JORC Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource of 
1.05 million tonnes grading 9.4% copper and 1.6g/t gold2. This includes a high-grade massive sulphide component 
of 763,000t grading 12.1% Cu and 2.1g/t Au for 92,000t of contained copper and 52,000oz of contained gold2. 
The Monty Mineral Resource estimate is set out in Table 2.

The mineralisation interpretation is supported by a total of 127 fully logged and validated diamond drill holes for some 
42,351 meters, defining the current limit of the Monty Resource; 82 of which (on a nominal 40m x 30m spacing), 
intersected massive sulphide mineralisation and have been used to inform the Mineral Resource estimate (Figure 4).

Drill spacing is such that 99% of the Mineral Resource (97,000t of contained Cu and 54,000oz of contained Au), has 
been classified by Sandfire into the JORC 2012 Indicated category, and as such is available for conversion to mineral 
reserve status.

Type

Mineral Resource 
Category

Massive 
Sulphide

Indicated

Inferred

Total

Indicated

Tonnes

754,000

9,000

763,000

287,000

Halo

Inferred

– 

Total

Indicated

Total

Inferred

Total

287,000

 1,041,000

9,000

1,050,000

Table 2: Monty Mineral Resource3 – 31 March 2016

Grade

Cu (%)

Contained

Grade

Contained

Cu (t)

Au (g/t)

Gold (oz)

12.0

20.7

12.1

2.2

–

2.2

9.3

20.7

9.4

91,000

 2,000

92,000

6,000

–

6,000

97,000

2,000

99,000

2.1

2.7

2.1

0.3

–

0.3

1.6

2.7

1.6

51,000

1,000

52,000

3,000

–

3,000

54,000

1,000

55,000

2  For details relating to the Monty JORC Mineral Resource, see Sandfire Resources NL ASX announcement dated 13 April 2016, available on the Sandfire 

and ASX websites.

3  Numbers as presented at a 1.0% Cu cut-off grade. Calculations have been rounded to the nearest 1000t, 0.1 % copper grade and 1000t copper metal, 

0.1 g/t gold grade, 1000oz gold metal, differences may occur due to rounding.

Page 8

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

Figure 4: Diagrammatic Vertical Longitudinal Projection4 of the Monty resource wireframes and selected significant intersections.

Monty Deposit Geology
Copper and gold mineralisation at Monty is hosted in a sequence of sediments (siltstone, sandstones and conglomerates) 
and basaltic rocks. Mineralisation occurs in a series of massive sulphide lenses that are interpreted to have been deposited 
at different stratigraphic levels within the sedimentary package.

The modelled mineralisation at Monty is contained within seven stacked lenses of massive sulphide (Figure 4) that 
encapsulate the massive sulphide mineralisation. Over 87% of the contained metal is within two main lenses.

Adjacent to these massive sulphide lenses, the host sequence shows moderate to strong chlorite alteration with 
disseminated and/or blebby sulphides throughout. This zone of altered, sulphidic host rock is known as ‘halo 
mineralisation’ which has been modelled both internal to the main massive sulphide lenses and as an external skin that sits 
directly adjacent to the high-grade massive sulphides.

Two separate lenses of high-grade bornite mineralisation have been modelled by Sandfire within the two main massive 
sulphide lenses. Mineralisation in these bornite-containing zones (Figure 5) is of significantly higher tenor than that in the 
normal (i.e. non-bornite containing) massive sulphide zones. Based on drill-hole geometry and core observations, the 
bornite zones are interpreted by Sandfire to be approximately orthogonal to lithological layering.

Figure 5: Large diameter (PQ) metallurgical drill core from Monty Copper-Gold deposit.

4  Vertical Longitudinal Projection and simplified interpretation, by Talisman, of the Monty discovery with drill-hole pierce points at the top of the interpreted 

primary intercept. All intercepts are shown as down-hole widths.

Page 9

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

Monty Development Studies
A high-level study assessing potential for mining the Monty deposit was completed by the Joint Venture during the June 
quarter of 2016. The purpose of the study was to identify any fatal flaws and to investigate optionality of various facets of 
Monty development including surface infrastructure location, site access, applicable mining methods and permitting and 
approval pathways.

Results of the preliminary study work were positive with no fatal flaws identified and the Joint Venture subsequently 
approved and commenced the Monty feasibility study with a budget of A$3.9M (100% basis).The following feasibility study 
work streams commenced in June 2016:

•  Metallurgical test work with a specific focus on comminution and flotation;
•  Geotechnical and structural geology studies;
•  Mine design engineering including stoping, ore access and ventilation work; and
•  Evaluation of a proposed haul road route between Sandfire’s DeGrussa Copper-Gold mine and Monty.

Subsequent to the end of the financial year, on 14 July 2016, the Joint Venture Manager submitted a MLA to the 
Department of Mines and Petroleum of Western Australia, on behalf of the Joint Venture over the Monty Copper-Gold 
Project (Figure 3), (see ASX release “Monty Mining Lease Application”).

The area of the MLA is 16.42km2 and covers the footprint of the known mineralisation of the Monty deposit as well as the 
surrounding area which will be required for the box-cut and decline portal and other supporting mine infrastructure. The 
MLA process will be progressed in parallel with consultations and negotiations with relevant stakeholders and preparations 
for future mining activities.

Springfield Exploration
The exploration strategy employed by the Joint Venture at the Springfield Project in the search for new deposits leverages 
off existing data sets from Talisman and Sandfire’s activities and follows a staged and systematic process aimed at 
building geological, geochemical and structural understanding. This process involves the collection and integration of data 
collected from the following:

•  Air-Core drilling is used to build both geological and geochemical information, with infill drilling used to further refine 

initial interpretations.

•  Air-Core drill data is evaluated through a series of elemental ratios which aids in the identification of specific target 

exhalative stratigraphic horizons.

•  Defined horizons are then tested via a Down Hole Electro-Magnetic (DHEM) geophysical survey, which involves 
drilling a deeper RC drill hole to act as a platform for the DHEM survey aimed at identifying conductive sulphide 
mineralisation in the immediate vicinity of the surveyed drill hole.

•  Following DHEM data collection and interpretation, a diamond drilling program may be developed to test discrete 

DHEM anomalies identified in the survey.
Integration of the new information is undertaken to further develop and refine the geological interpretation.

• 

This process is iterative, and commonly involves multiple phases of testing, interpretation and retesting as new information 
is gathered through the process that challenges previous interpretations.

Drilling of regional stratigraphic target horizons during the financial year was restricted to first pass testing at Homer and to 
the north-east of the Monty deposit which intersected the interpreted host stratigraphy along both trends.

Systematic air-core drilling across the Southern Volcanics and the wider regional Springfield Project area was also 
undertaken to accurately delineate the interpreted VMS horizon along the prospective host horizon. 

Future Activities
Consistent with the strategy employed by the Joint Venture, continued exploration activity will be focussed on identifying 
and testing stratigraphic packages across Joint Venture tenements. Additionally, further testing in the near Monty 
environment is expected including the potential for down-dip extensions to the Monty deposit.

Page 10

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

HALLOWEEN WEST
(18.8% Talisman Mining Ltd – Joint Venture with Sandfire Resources NL)

The Halloween West Joint Venture Project is located immediately to the west of the Halloween Project and approximately 
20km west south-west of Sandfire’s DeGrussa Copper-Gold Mine.

The Halloween West Joint Venture was formed in 2012 when Talisman reached agreement with Chrysalis Resources 
Limited (ASX: CYS) to farm into the Halloween West Copper-Gold Project.

In October 2014, Sandfire Resources acquired the interest held by Chrysalis Resources and the Joint Venture is now 
between Talisman and Sandfire.

Exploration work by Sandfire (acting as the Joint Venture Manager) has been limited to desktop studies and a review of 
historic work completed over the project. With the focus of on-ground exploration moving away from resource definition at 
Monty to a more regional focus, it is anticipated that Sandfire will conduct on-ground exploration to test the various targets 
that have been identified.

HALLOWEEN
(30% Talisman Mining Ltd – Joint Venture with Sandfire Resources NL)

The Halloween Project is located approximately 17km west south-west of Sandfire’s DeGrussa Copper-Gold Mine. The 
Halloween Project covers the interpreted western extension of the Narracoota Volcanic Formation that locally hosts the 
DeGrussa Deposit.

Tenement P52/1241 was surrendered by the Joint Venture during the reporting period.

SINCLAIR NICKEL PROJECT
(100% Talisman Mining Ltd)

Sinclair is located in the world-class Agnew-Wiluna Greenstone Belt in WA’s North-eastern Goldfields. The Sinclair Nickel 
Project, developed and commissioned in 2008 and operated successfully before being placed on care and maintenance in 
August 2013, produced approximately 38,500 tonnes of nickel at an average life-of-mine head grade of 2.44% Ni. Sinclair 
has extensive infrastructure and includes a substantial 290km2 tenement package covering more than 80km strike of 
prospective ultramafic contact within a 35km radius of the existing processing plant and infrastructure (Figure 6).

During the year Talisman undertook its maiden exploration program at Sinclair including surface geophysics and diamond 
and RC drilling at selected regional locations across the project. Successful intersection of nickel sulphide mineralisation at 
the Delphi Prospect (2.2m @ 1.9% Ni from 396.6m down hole) supports the prospectivity of Sinclair for the discovery of a 
new nickel sulphide mineralisation.

Talisman continued to develop and advance its understanding of Sinclair throughout the year with a regional exploration 
review and targeting process undertaken in the first half of the financial year. This review of the near mine environment 
focused primarily on the Sinclair Trend, an 8km strike of ultramafic/basal contact running from the Sinclair deposit to the 
Delphi Prospect. In the second half of the financial year, drilling activities included a limited program on high priority regional 
targets. A follow-up program of DHEM surveys, RC and diamond drilling was commenced in August 2016.

Page 11

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

Figure 6: The Sinclair Nickel Project showing regional geology nickel production centres and reported contained nickel* of 
the Agnew-Wiluna Belt (*MINDEX 2012)

Figure 7: Sinclair Project – Prospect Locations.

Page 12

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

Delphi Prospect
The Delphi Prospect is located between 4-10km south of the Sinclair mine (Figure 7), covering approximately 6km of 
prospective ultramafic stratigraphy where drilling in the first half of the financial year returned 2.2m @ 1.9% Ni from 396.6m 
down hole in one of two holes drilled as part of the Company’s maiden exploration program.

In August 2015, Talisman completed a surface Moving Loop Electro-Magnetic (MLEM) survey across approximately six 
strike kilometres of prospective ultramafic stratigraphy at the Delphi Prospect that had not been subject to any modern 
geophysics. Talisman employed modern surface geophysical techniques utilising a high-powered geophysical transmitter 
and B-field SQUID sensor in a moving loop configuration to ensure the best possible EM coverage of the area.

Assessment of the results of the MLEM surveys identified five high priority EM anomalies, three anomalies at Delphi North 
(constituting one target area) and two anomalies at Delphi (Figure 8).

Figure 8: Delphi prospect showing geophysical anomalies identified from 
MLEM geophysics.

Historic drill intersections of nickel sulphides in the vicinity of the geophysical anomalies identified at Delphi North provided 
a target that was drill tested with two diamond drill-holes as part of a broader campaign during the first half of the financial 
year. Drill-hole SND001 (Figure 10), which targeted the interpreted MLEM anomaly, intersected a number of massive, 
matrix and breccia sulphide horizons in a deformed sequence of host ultramafic and basaltic rock units.

Page 13

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

Assay results returned an overall intercept of:

•  2.2m at 1.9% Ni from 396.9m down-hole.

Narrow zones of massive nickel sulphides (Figure 9) within this overall intersection returned assay results including:

•  0.6m at 2.19% Ni from 396.9m down-hole; and
•  0.5m at 2.94% Ni from 398.6m down-hole.

Figure 9: Photograph of massive nickel sulphides intersected in diamond drill-hole 
SND001 at the Delphi North Prospect.

The main sulphide intersection within the hole is represented by a total of 1.4 metres of massive, matrix and breccia 
sulphides within a 2.2 metre interval, with narrow zones of strongly foliated basaltic rocks from 396.9m to 399.1m 
down. The vertical depth of this intersection is approximately 348m below surface.

Figure 10: Interpretive longitudinal section of the Delphi – Delphi North Prospects (looking west) showing priority surface and down-
hole geophysical EM anomalies; historical drilling and significant mineralised intersections; and recent drilling by Talisman.

Drill-hole SND002, (Figure 10) which was completed approximately 100m south of SND001, intersected a narrow zone of 
stringer sulphides within a highly deformed, complex sequence of ultramafic, basaltic and sedimentary rock units. While 
the stringer sulphides intersected by this hole are not interpreted to host significant mineralisation, the hole demonstrates 
the continuity of the fertile ultramafic horizon at Delphi North.

In conjunction with historical intersections at Delphi North, the recent drilling has now defined nickel sulphide mineralisation 
over a strike length of 600m and follow up RC and diamond drilling commenced in September 2016 to test this potential.

Cody Well
The Cody Well Prospect is located approximately 3km north of the Sinclair mine (Figure 7).

As part of Talisman’s maiden drilling program in the first half of the year, one diamond drill-hole (SND003) was completed at 
Cody Well to target a priority EM anomaly interpreted to lie in a favorable stratigraphic position along strike from the Sinclair 
deposit and an associated coincident geochemical anomaly.

Page 14

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

This hole intersected narrow stringer sulphides in the stratigraphic hanging wall position and a narrow ultramafic unit which 
is interpreted to represent the extension of the fertile Sinclair ultramafic unit. Visual inspection of the mineralisation identified 
pyrrhotite as the dominant nickel-bearing sulphide mineral with accessory pyrite and chalcopyrite.

Although no significant assay results were returned from this drill-hole, Talisman considers the identification of the fertile 
Sinclair ultramafic unit at Cody Well to represent a significant advance in early stage exploration of this area.

A DHEM survey will be completed at a later date and is expected to provide greater definition for the source of the 
previously identified Fixed Loop Electro-Magnetic anomaly.

Sinclair Trend
Late in the financial year Talisman commenced a review of the near-mine geological environment, specifically assessing 
lithological, geochemical and supporting geophysical data to better understand the controls on mineralisation within the 
Sinclair Trend and refine the targeting model for Sinclair-style deposits.

Figure 11: Oblique projection of the Sinclair Ultramafic trend.

The remodelling of the ultramafic/basal contact in the near mine environment identified multiple mineralised positions, 
reaffirming the high prospectivity of the Sinclair Trend including the Delphi North Prospect (Figure 11).

A campaign of on-ground exploration at Delphi North commenced in early September 2016 to follow up these results.

Future Activities
The start of planned on-ground exploration in September 2016 signals the commencement of an efficient, staged and 
ongoing exploration focus at Sinclair. As a result of the extensive regional exploration review undertaken in 2015 and the 
recent re-modelling of the ultramafic contact along the Sinclair Trend, multiple targets have been identified that remain to 
be tested. These targets will be subject to further review and prioritisation during the financial year ending 30 June 2017 as 
on-ground exploration activities at Sinclair progress.

The current program of exploration activities represents the first stage of on-ground work at Sinclair. Subsequent work 
within the Sinclair Trend will be focused on further defining potential targets for proposed future on-ground exploration 
testing, with work to potentially include:

•  Re-modelling of the Stirling and Skye mineralised positions;
•  Review of newly identified parallel structures to east & west of Sinclair;
•  Re-modelling of the Sinclair mine extensions;
•  Re-modelling of Sinclair mine remnants;
•  Re-conditioning and DHEM of historic drill holes adjacent to the existing Sinclair mine;
•  Re-logging of historic drill core;
•  Detailed geology sectional interpretations;
•  Geological mapping; 
•  Surface SQUID EM surveys; and
•  RC/diamond and Air-Core drilling campaigns. 

Competent Person’s Statement
Information in this report that relates to Exploration Results and Exploration Targets is based on information completed by 
Mr Anthony Greenaway, who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Greenaway is a full time 
employee of Talisman Mining Ltd and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and types 
of deposits under consideration and to the activities undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 
Edition of the “Australian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Greenaway consents to the 
inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.

Page 15

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■  TENEMENT SCHEDULE 
As at date of report

Project

Tenement

 Blocks 
(Area)

Talisman 
Equity (%)

JV Partner

Expiry

 Annual 
Commit-
ment

Comments

Halloween 
West / 
Doolgunna 
West

Springfield

Sinclair

 E52/2275

 6.0

18.8%

Sandfire Resources NL

8/02/19

 $ 50,000

 E52/2282
 E52/2313
 E52/2466
 E52/3424*
 E52/3425*

 E36/0650
 E37/1231
 E37/0903
 L36/0198
 L37/0175
 M36/0444
 M36/0445
 M36/0446
 M37/1063
 M37/1089
 M37/1090
 M37/1126
 M37/1127
 M37/1136
 M37/1137
 M37/1148
 M37/1168
 M37/1223
 M37/1275
 M37/0362
 M37/0383
 M37/0384
 M37/0385
 M37/0386
 M37/0424
 M37/0426
 M37/0427
 M37/0590
 M37/0692
 M37/0735
 M37/0816
 M37/0818
 M37/0819
 P37/7228
 P37/7233

 70.0
 14.0
 14.0
 1.0
 6.0

 16.0
 3.0
 13.0
 103.1 HA
 83.9 HA
 568.0 HA
 973.0 HA
 843.0 HA
 604.0 HA
 574.0 HA
 478.0 HA
 603.0 HA
 603.0 HA
 986.0 HA
 850.0 HA
 44.7 HA
 190.0 HA
 675.0 HA
 1961.0 HA
 981.5 HA
 841.7 HA
 536.7 HA
 926.8 HA
 983.8 HA
 891.0 HA
 505.0 HA
 821.0 HA
 120.0 HA
 136.0 HA
 959.0 HA
 818.4 HA
 806.5 HA
 380.1 HA
 61.5 HA
 116.0 HA

30.0%
30.0%
30.0%

Sandfire Resources NL
Sandfire Resources NL
Sandfire Resources NL

24/11/19  $ 140,000
 $ 50,000
24/11/19
 $ 50,000
5/04/20

100.0%

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Application
Application

Application

15/10/18

 $ 50,000

 $ 50,000
21/09/18
 $ – 
19/04/28
 $ – 
19/04/28
 $ 56,800
27/03/29
 $ 97,300
27/03/29
 $ 84,300
27/03/29
 $ 60,400
27/03/29
 $ 57,400
22/04/29
 $ 47,800
22/04/29
 $ 60,300
27/03/29
 $ 60,300
27/03/29
 $ 98,600
27/03/29
 $ 85,000
27/03/29
 $ 10,000
27/03/29
 $ 19,000
27/03/29
27/03/29
 $ 67,500
29/07/28  $ 196,100
 $ 98,200
20/05/34
 $ 84,200
28/01/35
 $ 53,700
28/01/35
28/01/35
 $ 92,700
 $ 98,400
28/01/35
3/02/36
 $ 89,100
 $ 50,500
3/02/36
 $ 82,100
3/02/36
 $ 12,100
27/03/29
 $ 13,600
27/03/29
 $ 95,900
27/03/29
 $ 81,900
27/03/29
 $ 80,700
27/03/29
 $ 38,100
28/08/29
 $ 2,480
21/09/16
 $ 4,680
21/09/16

*  These tenements have been applied for jointly as part of the Company’s Doolgunna Cu-Au Projects Joint Venture with Sandfire Resources NL.

Page 16

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT

The Company’s Corporate Governance Statement can be found on the Company’s website at www.talismanmining.com.au/
about-us/corporate-governance.html under the heading marked “Corporate Governance Statement”.

The following governance-related documents can also be found on the Company’s website:

Charters
•  Board
•  Audit Committee
•  Nomination Committee
•  Remuneration Committee
•  Risk Committee

Constitution

•  Constitution of Talisman Mining Limited

Board

•  Code of Conduct – summary
•  Policy and Procedure for the Selection and (Re)Appointment of Directors
•  Process for Performance Evaluation

Compliance, Controls and Policies

•  Risk Management Policy – summary
•  Continuous Disclosure Policy – summary
•  Securities Trading Policy
•  Diversity Policy
•  Remuneration Policy

Shareholder Communication

•  Shareholder Communication and Investor Relations Policy

Page 17

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ DIRECTORS’ REPORT

Your Directors submit herewith the annual financial report of the consolidated entity (referred to hereafter as the Group) 
consisting of Talisman Mining Ltd and the entities it controlled during the financial year ended 30 June 2016. In order to 
comply with the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001, the Directors report as follows:

Information about directors
The names and particulars of the directors who held office during or since the end of the financial year are:

Name

Particulars

Jeremy Kirkwood
BCom ANU
Non-Executive Chairman

1 April 2016 – current

Daniel Madden
BComACC, ACA, Governance 
Institute of Australia
Managing Director

1 July 2016 – current

Alan Senior
Asscshp Mech Eng, FIEAUST, 
FAusIMM
Non-Executive Director

7 November 2007 – current

Non-Executive Chairman

7 November 2007 – 31 March 
2016

Chairman (Non-Executive/Independent)

Jeremy Kirkwood joined Talisman in April 2016 and has extensive experience in 
corporate strategy, investment banking and global capital market and provides invaluable 
strategic input and guidance to the Company’s board and management team.

Mr Kirkwood is a principal of Pilot Advisory Group and was previously a Managing 
Director at Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley and Austock. He has primarily worked in 
public markets, undertaking merger and acquisitions and capital raisings for companies 
principally in the metals and mining, energy and infrastructure sectors.

He is a Director of BGD Corporation, Chair of Geelong Grammar School and a Director 
of Independent Schools Victoria.

Jeremy serves on the Company’s Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committees. 
With extensive industry experience and being financially literate, Jeremy is considered 
qualified to hold these responsibilities.

Managing Director (Executive/Non-Independent)

Dan Madden was appointed as acting CEO in April 2016 and has been with Talisman 
since 2009 in his previous role as Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary. Dan 
has more than 15 years’ experience in the resource sector, including as General Manager 
– Finance for Xstrata Nickel Australasia and Financial Controller for Jubilee Mines NL.

He graduated from the University of Birmingham with a degree in Commerce and 
Accounting before joining Deloitte in the UK and Australia. He is an Associate Member 
of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and a member of the 
Governance Institute of Australia.

On the 1st of July 2016, Mr Madden was appointed as the Managing Director of Talisman 
Mining Ltd.

Non-Executive Director (Independent)

Alan graduated from the West Australian Institute of Technology (Curtin University) with 
an Associateship in Mechanical Engineering in 1968. He is an engineer with extensive 
experience in design and project development, mainly associated with the mining and 
mineral processing industry in Australia.

Prior to joining Talisman, Alan operated as an independent consultant servicing the 
mineral processing industry. Before joining the board of Jubilee in 2003 he led the team 
which completed the feasibility study for the Cosmos Nickel project and its successful 
implementation, followed three years later by the transition from open cut to underground 
mining. Alan was a non-executive Director of Jubilee Mines NL up until its purchase by 
Xstrata.

Alan was the Chairman of Talisman for over eight years. He serves on the Company’s 
Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committees. With extensive industry experience 
and being financially literate, Alan is considered qualified to hold these responsibilities.

Page 18

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ DIRECTORS’ REPORT

Name

Particulars

Brian Dawes
B. Sc. Mining, MAusIMM
Non-Executive Director

17 June 2009 – current

Karen Gadsby
B Comm, FCA, MAICD
Non-Executive Director

3 April 2008 – current

Gary Lethridge
B. Comm, CA, FCIS, FGIA, 
MAICD
Managing Director

2 February 2009 – 31 March 
2016

Non-Executive Director (Independent)

Brian is a mining engineer with extensive international mining industry experience. 
He holds a BSc in Mining from the University of Leeds UK, and is Member of the 
Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

He has worked in the UK, Africa, the Middle East and across Australia and holds several 
First Class Mine Managers’ Certificates of Competency. Brian’s diverse expertise 
covers all key industry aspects from exploration through the discovery, feasibility, 
funding, approvals, project construction, commissioning, operations, optimisation, 
logistics, marketing, and closure phases. This includes site management and corporate 
responsibilities in a diversity of challenging and successful underground and open 
pit operations across many commodities and geographies; mainly in copper, nickel, 
gold, zinc, lead, iron ore, graphite. and coal. Prior to joining Talisman, Brian held senior 
positions with Jubilee Mines NL, Western Areas, LionOre Australia, WMC, Normandy 
Mining, and Aberfoyle.

Brian serves on the Company’s Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committees. With 
extensive industry experience and being financially literate, Brian is considered qualified 
to hold these responsibilities.

Non-Executive Director (Independent)

Karen is a professional Non-Executive Director with over 30 years’ finance and 
commercial experience across several sectors.

She worked as an Executive for North Ltd throughout Australia for 13 years including at 
Robe River Iron Associates and Energy Resources of Australia Ltd.

She has held a number of directorships in Western Australia and is currently the Chair of 
Strategen Environmental Consulting Pty Ltd.

Karen is the Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Nomination and 
Remuneration Committees. With her extensive experience in finance and having chaired a 
number of Audit Committees, Karen is considered qualified to hold these responsibilities.

Former Managing Director (Executive/Non-Independent)

Gary is an experienced executive whose industry involvement has included exposure 
to all phases of mineral resources projects; from exploration, discovery, feasibility, 
development and through to operations.

Prior to joining Talisman in early 2009, Gary held the position of Executive General 
Manager-Corporate and Chief Financial Officer at Jubilee Mines NL, where he was part 
of the senior executive management team from 2003 until that company’s acquisition 
by Xstrata in early 2008. Before that, Gary held senior executive positions with LionOre 
Mining International Limited in Australia (now Norilsk Nickel) and has also previously 
acted as a Non-Executive Director of two Australian listed resources companies.

The above named directors held office for the entire period unless otherwise noted.

Page 19

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ DIRECTORS’ REPORT

Directorships of other listed companies
Directorships of other listed companies held by directors in the three years immediately before the end of the financial year 
are as follows:

Name

Company

Appointed

Resigned

Alan Senior

Amex Resources Limited

Jul-12

May-15

Directors’ shareholdings
The following table sets out each Director’s relevant interest in shares, and rights or options in shares of the Company or a 
related body corporate as at the date of this report:

Directors

Fully paid ordinary shares
Number

Share Options
Number

Jeremy Kirkwood

Daniel Madden

Alan Senior

Brian Dawes

Karen Gadsby

119,000

–

116,666

353,333

311,334

–

1,000,000

750,000

500,000

500,000

Remuneration of key management personnel
Information about the remuneration of Directors and senior management is set out in the Remuneration Report of this 
Directors’ Report.

Share options granted to key management personnel
During and since the end of the financial year, an aggregate of 500,000 share options were granted to the following 
directors and senior management as part of their remuneration:

Directors and senior 
management

Number of  
options granted

Issuing Entity

Number of ordinary  
shares under option

Anthony Greenaway (i)

500,000

Talisman Mining Ltd

500,000

(i)  125,000 vest on 30 September 2016; 125,000 options vest 31 March 2017; 125,000 options vest 30 September 

2017; and 125,000 vest 31 March 2018.

Page 20

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ DIRECTORS’ REPORT

Company Secretaries
Shaun Vokes, BBus, CPA
Appointed 1 May 2016

Shaun joined Talisman in February 2016. He is a finance professional with over 25 years’ experience in the metalliferous 
resources industry gained predominantly in senior operational and management roles within Australia and Africa.

Prior to joining Talisman, Shaun spent five years as Manager, Business Services/CFO for Kabanga Nickel Company Ltd 
in Tanzania. Shaun’s experience includes project evaluation and financing, business development, contract negotiation, 
metals marketing, risk management and corporate and financial governance for both private and ASX-listed entities across 
a range of base and precious metals.

Shaun is a graduate of Curtin University and holds a Bachelor of Business degree and is a member of the Australian 
Society of Certified Practicing Accountants.

Alex Neuling, BSc, FCA (ICAEW), ACIS
Appointed 1 May 2016

Alex Neuling is a Chartered Accountant and Chartered Secretary with extensive corporate and financial experience 
including as Director, Chief Financial Officer and/or Company Secretary of various ASX-listed companies in the mining, 
mineral exploration, oil & gas and other sectors.

Prior to those roles, Alex worked at Deloitte in London and Perth. Alex also holds an honours degree in Chemistry from the 
University of Leeds in the United Kingdom and is principal of Erasmus Consulting which provides company secretarial and 
financial management consultancy services to a variety of ASX-listed and other companies.

Principal activities
The principal activity of Talisman Mining Limited during the course of the financial year was exploration for, and 
development of, base metals and other minerals, including copper, copper-gold, gold and nickel.

Review of operations and future developments
A detailed review of operations during the financial year and commentary on future developments is set out in the section 
titled “Review of Operations” in this Annual Report.

Financial performance and financial position
Financial performance

During the financial year the Group reported an operating loss after tax of $8,010,457 (2015: loss after tax $3,769,482).

Revenue for the year of $348,355 (2015: $367,760) consisted primarily of bank interest earned on the Group’s short-term 
deposits held during the year.

During the year, the Group adopted a voluntary change in accounting policy whereby exploration and evaluation 
expenditure (other than expenditure related to the acquisition of exploration rights or expenditure incurred to determine 
the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extraction of a mineral deposit) is expensed as incurred rather than 
capitalised. This change in accounting policy has been adopted retrospectively, and hence prior year’s reported figures in 
this financial report may differ from figures reported in last years’ financial report.

Financial position

As at 30 June 2016 the Group had net assets of $29,265,537 (2015: $13,568,709) including $20,243,616 of cash and cash 
equivalents (2015: $4,865,632).

Changes in state of affairs
There was no significant change in the state of affairs of the Group during the financial year other than as set out in this 
report.

Page 21

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ DIRECTORS’ REPORT

Subsequent events
The following management changes were effective 1 July 2016:
•  Mr Daniel Madden was appointed as Managing Director
•  Mr Shaun Vokes was appointed as Chief Financial Officer

There has not been any other matter or circumstance occurring subsequent to end of the financial year that has 
significantly affected, or may significantly affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of 
affairs of the Group in future financial years.

Environmental regulations
The Group’s environmental obligations are regulated under both State and Federal legislation. Performance with respect 
to environmental obligations is monitored by the Board of Directors and subjected from time to time to government agency 
audits and site inspections. No significant or material environmental breaches have been notified by any government 
agency during the year ended 30 June 2016.

Dividends
No dividends have been paid or declared since the start of the financial year. No recommendation for the payment of a 
dividend has been made.

Share options
Shares under option or issued on exercise of options

Details of unissued shares or interests under option as at the date of this report are:

Issuing entity

Number of shares 
under option

Class of shares

Exercise price 
of options

Expiry date of 
options

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

150,000

175,000

175,000

562,500

562,500

562,500

562,500

150,000

750,000

750,000

125,000

125,000

125,000

125,000

125,000

125,000

125,000

125,000

125,000

125,000

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

$0.40

$0.50

$0.60

$0.43

$0.51

$0.60

$0.69

$0.90

$0.41

$0.49

$0.56

$0.64

$0.40

$0.50

$0.60

$0.70

$0.80

$0.90

$0.95

$1.00

30-Sep-16

30-Sep-16

30-Sep-16

31-Oct-16

31-Oct-16

31-Oct-16

31-Oct-16

30-Jun-17

31-Oct-17

31-Oct-17

31-Oct-17

31-Oct-17

1-Mar-18

1-Mar-18

1-Mar-18

1-Mar-18

31-Mar-19

31-Mar-19

31-Mar-19

31-Mar-19

The holders of these options do not have the right, by virtue of the option, to participate in any share issue or interest issue 
of any other body corporate or registered scheme.

Page 22

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ DIRECTORS’ REPORT

Shares issued on exercise of options
There were no shares or interests issued during or since the end of the financial year as a result of the exercise of options.

Options that expired/lapsed
Details of employee options that expired or lapsed during or since the end of the financial year are:

Issuing entity

Number of options 
expired/lapsed

Class of shares

Exercise price 
of options

Expiry date of 
options

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

Talisman Mining Limited

(250,000)

(250,000)

(250,000)

(250,000)

(25,000)

(25,000)

(25,000)

(25,000)

(25,000)

(25,000)

(25,000)

(25,000)

(625,000)

(625,000)

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

$1.02

$1.13

$1.41

$1.53

$0.44

$0.47

$0.49

$0.52

$0.44

$0.47

$0.49

$0.52

$0.56

$0.64

31-Jul-15

31-Jul-15

31-Jul-15

31-Jul-15

31-Aug-15

31-Aug-15

31-Aug-15

31-Aug-15

31-Oct-15

31-Oct-15

31-Oct-15

31-Oct-15

31-Mar-16

31-Mar-16

Indemnification of officers and auditors
During the financial year, the Company entered into a contract insuring the Directors and executive officers of the Company 
and of any related body corporate against a liability incurred as a Director or executive officer to the extent permitted by the 
Corporations Act 2001. The contract of insurance prohibits disclosure of the nature of the liability and the amount of the 
premium.

The Company has not otherwise, during or since the end of the financial year, except to the extent permitted by law, 
indemnified or agreed to indemnify an officer or auditor of the Company or related body corporate against a liability 
incurred as an officer or auditor.

Page 23

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ DIRECTORS’ REPORT

Directors’ meetings
The following table sets out the number of Directors’ meetings (including meetings of committees of directors) held 
during the financial year and the number of meetings attended by each Director (while they were a director or committee 
member). During the financial year, 11 board meetings, 2 audit committee meetings, 1 remuneration committee meeting 
and 2 nomination committee meeting were held.

Directors

Jeremy Kirkwood

Alan Senior

Gary Lethridge

Brian Dawes

Karen Gadsby

Board of directors

Audit committee

Remuneration 
committee

Nomination 
committee

Eligible  
to attend

Attended

Eligible  
to attend

Attended

Eligible  
to attend

Attended

Eligible  
to attend

Attended

4

11

6

11

11

4

11

6

11

10

–

2

1

2

2

–

1

1

2

2

1

1

–

1

1

1

1

–

1

1

2

2

–

2

2

2

2

–

2

2

Note: Executive Directors attending committee meetings during the year attended all or part of the meeting by invitation of 
the relevant Committee.

Proceedings on behalf of the Company
No persons have applied for leave pursuant to s.237 of the Corporation Act 2001 to bring, or intervene in, proceedings on 
behalf of Talisman Mining Limited.

Non-Audit Services
Details of amounts paid or payable to the auditor for non-audit services provided during the year by the auditor are outlined 
in Note 29 to the financial statements. The Directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services is compatible with 
the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001.

The Directors are of the opinion that the services do not compromise the auditor’s independence as all non-audit services 
have been reviewed to ensure that they do not impact the impartiality and objectivity of the auditor and none of the 
services undermine the general principles relating to auditor independence as set out in Code of Conduct APES 110: Code 
of Ethics for Professional Accountants issued by the Accounting Professional & Ethical Standards Board.

Auditor Independence declaration
Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 requires our auditors, HLB Mann Judd, to provide the Directors of the 
Company with an Independence Declaration in relation to the audit of the annual report. This Independence Declaration is 
set out on page 33 and forms part of this Directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2016.

Page 24

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REMUNERATION REPORT

This Remuneration Report, which forms part of the Directors’ report, sets out information about the remuneration of the 
key management personnel of Talisman Mining Limited (the “Company”) for the financial year ended 30 June 2016. The 
information in the remuneration report has been audited as required by Section 308(3C) of the Corporations Act 2001.

The remuneration report details the remuneration arrangements for key management personnel who are defined as those 
persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the major activities of the Company and 
the Group, directly or indirectly, including any director (whether executive or otherwise) of the parent company.

The prescribed details for each person covered by this report are detailed below under the following headings:
(a)  key management personnel details;
(b)  remuneration policy and relationship between the remuneration policy and Company performance;
(c)  key terms of employment contracts; and
(d)  remuneration of key management personnel.

(a)  Key management personnel details
The key management personnel of Talisman Mining Limited during the year were:
Non-Executive Chairman 
Jeremy Kirkwood 
Non-Executive Director
Alan Senior 
Non-Executive Director
Brian Dawes 
Non-Executive Director
Karen Gadsby 
Managing Director 
Gary Lethridge 
Chief Financial Officer to Acting Chief Executive Officer 
Daniel Madden 
Commercial Manager/ Company Secretary  
Shaun Vokes 
General Manager – Geology 
Anthony Greenaway 
General Manager – Project Development
Ben Wilson 

(Appointed 1 April 2016)

(Resigned 31 March 2016)
(Appointed 1 April 2016)
(Appointed 29 February 2016)
(Appointed 15 March 2016)

(b)   Remuneration policy and relationship between the remuneration policy and 

Company performance

Key management personnel (excluding Non-Executive Directors)

The Board is responsible for determining the remuneration policies for the Group, including those affecting Executive 
Directors and other key management personnel. The Board may seek appropriate external advice to assist in its decision 
making.

The Company’s remuneration policy for executive directors and key management personnel is designed to promote 
superior performance and long term commitment to the Company. The main principles of the policy when considering 
remuneration are as follows:

•  executive directors and key management personnel are motivated to pursue long term growth and success of the 

Company within an appropriate control framework;
interests of key leadership are aligned with the long-term interests of the Company’s shareholders; and
there is a clear correlation between performance and remuneration.

• 
• 

The remuneration policy for executive directors and other key management personnel has three main components, fixed 
remuneration, long term incentive and a potential discretionary bonus.

Fixed remuneration

Executive Directors and other key management personnel receive fixed remuneration in the form of a base salary (plus 
statutory superannuation) which is reviewed annually by the Remuneration Committee. The review process includes 
a review of companywide and individual performance, comparative compensation in the market and internally, and, if 
appropriate, external advice to assist in its decision making.

Page 25

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REMUNERATION REPORT

Long term incentives

To align the interests of key management personnel with the long term objectives of the Group and its shareholders, the 
Group’s policy, having regard to the stage of development of its assets, is to issue share options under the shareholder 
approved ‘Executive and Employee Option Plan’ (EEOP) and at the discretion of the Board, subject to shareholder approval 
for directors. The issue of share options as remuneration represents cost effective consideration to Directors and key 
management personnel for their commitment and contribution to the Group and are used as a strategic tool to recruit and 
retain high calibre personnel. Options issued during the year vest at various periods during the life of the options and value 
is only realised by directors and key management personnel upon growth at various premiums to the Company’s 5-day 
volume weighted share price from the date of grant and subsequent vesting of the options.

Vesting conditions relating to the performance of the Group are not considered appropriate having regard to the stage of 
development of the Group’s assets.

Potential discretionary bonus

A potential discretionary bonus may be paid to executive directors and other key management personnel. Any potential 
bonus paid is at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee and will typically be made in recognition of contribution to 
the Company’s performance and other significant efforts of Executive Directors and other key management personnel in 
applicable and appropriate circumstances. There were no discretionary bonuses paid during or with regard to the financial 
years ended 30 June 2015 or 30 June 2016.

Non-Executive Directors

The Group’s Non-Executive Directors receive fees (including statutory superannuation) for their services and the 
reimbursement of reasonable expenses. The fees paid to the Group’s Non-Executive Directors reflect the demands on, and 
responsibilities of, the directors. They do not receive any retirement benefits (other than compulsory superannuation). The 
Board decides annually the level of fees to be paid to Non-Executive Directors with reference to market standards.

Non-Executive Directors may also receive share options where this is considered appropriate by the Board as a whole 
and with regard to the stage of the Group’s development. Such options vest across the life of the option and are primarily 
designed to provide an incentive to Non-Executive Directors to remain with the Group. Options issued to Non-Executive 
Directors are subject to shareholder approval.

A Non-Executive Directors’ fee pool limit of $300,000 per annum was approved by the shareholders at the General 
Meeting on 19 May 2008 and was utilised to a level of $178,000 (inclusive of superannuation) for the financial year ended 
30 June 2016. The fee paid for the 2016 financial year to the Chairman was $74,506 per annum and $45,900 per annum 
for the Non-Executive Directors (excluding statutory superannuation).

(c)  Key terms of employment contracts
Remuneration and other terms of employment for executive directors are formalised in a letter agreement. The Acting CEO, 
Daniel Madden’s remuneration and other terms are formalised by way of a letter agreement that is ongoing. The notice 
period for Mr. Madden is three months and payment of a termination benefit on early termination by the Group (other than 
for gross misconduct) at the end of the notice period, is three months’ base salary. Where the Group elects to dispense 
with the notice period and terminate employment, six months’ base salary applies.

Remuneration and other terms of employment for Mr Vokes, Mr Wilson, and Mr Greenaway are formalised by way of letter 
agreements which are ongoing. The notice period for Mr Vokes is three months and a termination benefit payable on early 
termination by the Group (other than for gross misconduct) is equal to three months’ base salary and the notice period for 
Mr Wilson and Mr Greenaway is four weeks and a termination benefit payable on early termination by the Group (other than 
for gross misconduct) is equal to four weeks’ base salary.

Remuneration for executive directors and key management personnel consists of a base salary, superannuation and 
performance incentives. Long term performance incentives may include options granted at the discretion of the Board 
subject to obtaining the relevant approvals. The remuneration of the Managing Director is recommended to the Board 
by the Remuneration Committee. Remuneration of key management personnel (excluding Non-Executive Directors) is 
recommended annually by the Remuneration Committee in consultation with the Managing Director or equivalent.

Page 26

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REMUNERATION REPORT

(d)  Remuneration of key management personnel
Details of the nature and amount of each element of the remuneration for key management personnel during the year are 
set out in the following tables:

Short-term employee benefits
employment benefits

Post-
employ-
ment 
benefits

Salary
& fees
$

Bonus
$

Non-
monetary
$

Other
$

Super-
annuation
$

Other 
long-term 
employee 
benefits
$

Share-
based 
payment
Options 
(ix)
$

Total
$

% of 
compen-
sation 
linked to 
perfor-
mance
%

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

2016

Directors

Jeremy  
Kirkwood (i)

Alan Senior (ii)

Gary Lethridge 
(iii)

Brian Dawes

Karen Gadsby

 20,000

 65,981

 281,242

 45,900

 45,900

Executives

Daniel Madden 
(iv)

 252,962

Shaun Vokes (v)

 58,513

Ben Wilson

 180,000

Anthony 
Greenaway (vi)

 54,000

1,004,498

2015

Directors

Alan Senior

 72,675

Gary Lethridge

 281,138

Brian Dawes

Karen Gadsby

Graeme 
Cameron (vii)

 45,900

 45,900

 202,053

Executives

Daniel Madden

 216,000

Graham Leaver

 75,096

Peter Cash (viii)

 152,017

 1,090,779

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 13,327

 – 

 – 

 4,330

 – 

 – 

 – 

17,657

 – 

 14,729

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 14,729

0.00%

1.77%

6.56%

1.69%

 1,900

 6,268

 – 

 – 

–

 21,900

 1,299

 73,548

 30,688

 41,792

 25,748

 392,797

 4,361

 4,361

 24,031

 5,559

 17,100

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 866

 51,127

 18,721

 68,982

27.14%

 1,732

 283,055

 – 

 64,072

 16,407

 213,507

0.61%

0.00%

7.68%

 5,130

 – 

 18,674

 77,804

24.00%

99,398

 41,792

83,447 1,246,792

 6,904

 26,708

 4,361

 4,361

 – 

 22,697

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 20,520

 7,134

 12,207

 104,892

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 10,339

 89,918

11.50%

 147,292

 469,867

31.35%

 6,893

 57,154

12.06%

 29,458

 79,719

36.95%

 – 

 224,750

0.00%

 13,785

 250,305

5.51%

 17,734

 99,964

17.74%

 – 

 164,224

0.00%

 225,501  1,435,901

(i)  Jeremy Kirkwood was appointed 1 April 2016 as Non-Executive Chairman.
(ii)  Alan Senior was Non-Executive Chairman from 1 July 2015 to 31 March 2016 and Non-Executive Director 31 March 

2016 to 30 June 2016.

Page 27

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REMUNERATION REPORT

(iii)  Gary Lethridge resigned on 31 March 2016 and salaries and fees detailed above include long service leave and annual 

leave entitlements paid on termination.

(iv)  Daniel Madden was appointed Acting Chief Executive Officer from 1 April 2016.
(v)  Shaun Vokes was appointed from 29 February 2016.
(vi)  Anthony Greenaway was appointed from 15 March 2016.
(vii) Graeme Cameron resigned on 15 January 2015 and salaries and fees detailed above include annual leave entitlements 

paid on termination.

(viii) Peter Cash was made redundant on the 5  November 2015.
(ix)  The value of share based payments shown in the table are non-cash values based on an accounting valuation 

calculated under the Black Scholes option pricing method.

Incentive share based payment arrangements in existence during the financial year

During the financial year the following incentive share based payment arrangements for key management personnel were in 
existence:

Options 
Series

Number

Grant date

Expiry date

Vesting date

Exercise  
price
$

Fair value per 
option at grant 
date (i)
$

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

 250,000

 250,000

 250,000

 250,000

 562,500

 562,500

 562,500

 562,500

 750,000

 750,000

 750,000

 750,000

 125,000

 125,000

 125,000

 125,000

 150,000

 175,000

 175,000

 150,000

 125,000

 125,000

 125,000

 125,000

15-Mar-12

15-Mar-12

15-Mar-12

15-Mar-12

25-Nov-13

25-Nov-13

25-Nov-13

25-Nov-13

5-Dec-14

5-Dec-14

5-Dec-14

5-Dec-14

4-Mar-15

4-Mar-15

4-Mar-15

4-Mar-15

5-Mar-15

5-Mar-15

5-Mar-15

11-Aug-15

4-Apr-16

4-Apr-16

4-Apr-16

4-Apr-16

31-Jul-15

31-Jul-15

31-Jul-15

31-Jul-15

31-Oct-16

31-Oct-16

31-Oct-16

31-Oct-16

31-Oct-17

31-Oct-17

31-Oct-17

31-Oct-17

1-Mar-18

1-Mar-18

1-Mar-18

1-Mar-18

30-Sep-16

30-Sep-16

30-Sep-16

30-Jun-17

31-Mar-19

31-Mar-19

31-Mar-19

31-Mar-19

13-Sep-12

15-Mar-13

13-Sep-13

15-Mar-14

26-May-14

25-Nov-14

26-May-15

25-Nov-15

25-May-15

24-Nov-15

24-May-16

24-Nov-16

1-Sep-15

1-Mar-16

1-Sep-16

1-Mar-17

11-Jul-15

12-Oct-15

12-Jun-16

31-Dec-15

30-Sep-16

31-Mar-17

30-Sep-17

31-Mar-18

$1.02

$1.13

$1.41

$1.53

$0.43

$0.51

$0.60

$0.69

$0.41

$0.49

$0.56

$0.64

$0.40

$0.50

$0.60

$0.70

$0.40

$0.50

$0.60

$0.90

$0.80

$0.90

$0.95

$1.00

$0.18

$0.18

$0.16

$0.16

$0.04

$0.04

$0.04

$0.03

$0.11

$0.10

$0.10

$0.10

$0.11

$0.10

$0.10

$0.09

$0.07

$0.06

$0.06

$0.37

$0.02

$0.14

$0.13

$0.13

(i)  The fair value per option at grant date is not the exercise price but the non-cash inferred value based upon the Black 

Scholes option pricing model.

Page 28

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REMUNERATION REPORT

Potential value at the vesting date of options currently granted to directors and key management personnel is only 
realised by those optionholders upon increases in the Company’s share price at a certain premium to the 5-day volume 
weighted share price at the date of grant of the options and the optionholder subsequently exercising those options. This 
represents a performance criterion directly related to substantial share price increases prior to realisation of potential value. 
Optionholders must also be either a director or employee at the time of vesting for granted options to vest. Other than the 
above, there are no other performance criteria that need to be met in relation to options granted under series 1 to 24 before 
the beneficial interest vests in the recipient. 

The following grants of share based payment compensation were made to key management personnel during the current 
financial year.

Directors and senior 
management

Number of options 
granted

Issuing Entity

Number of ordinary  
shares under option

Anthony Greenaway

500,000

Talisman Mining Ltd

500,000

The primary purpose of the grant of share based payment compensation to key management personnel is to provide cost 
effective consideration for their ongoing retention, commitment and contribution to the Company. The determined fair 
values of share based payments contained within this Remuneration Report are non-cash, inferred values and realisation 
of any value from the options requires significant growth in the share price between the date of grant of the options and the 
vesting date of the options in addition to the options then being exercised. The vesting dates of options granted as share 
based payments are structured to encourage and potentially reward longevity of service to the Company and realisation of 
value to shareholders.

Options granted to Executive and Non-Executive Directors are approved by shareholders at general meetings of the 
Company.

The assessed fair value at the grant date of options granted to individuals is allocated equally over the period from the grant 
date to the vesting date, and the amount is included in the remuneration tables in this remuneration report. Fair values at 
grant date are determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the term 
of the option, the share price at grant date, the expected price volatility of the underlying share and the risk free rate for the 
term of the option.

Inputs into model

20

Exercise price

Grant date share price  
(5 day VWAP)

Expected volatility

Risk-free interest rate

Dividend yield (%)

Expected life of options (years)

 $ 0.90

 $ 0.590

150%

1.95%

Nil

 1.64

21

 $ 0.80

 $ 0.465

68%

1.95%

Nil

 3.30

22

23

24

 $ 0.90

 $ 0.95

 $ 1.00

 $ 0.465

 $ 0.465

 $ 0.465

68%

1.95%

Nil

 3.30

68%

1.95%

Nil

 3.30

68%

1.95%

Nil

 3.30

During the year, no key management personnel exercised options that were granted to them as part of their compensation 
in that year.

Page 29

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REMUNERATION REPORT

Value of options issued to directors and executives

The following table summarises the value of options granted, exercised or lapsed during the annual reporting period to the 
identified directors or executives.

Value of options 
granted at the  
grant date (i)
$

Value of options 
exercised at the 
exercise date
$

Value of options 
lapsed at the date  
of lapse (ii)
$

Name

Directors

Jeremy Kirkwood

Alan Senior

Gary Lethridge

Brian Dawes

Karen Gadsby

Executives

Daniel Madden

Shaun Vokes

Ben Wilson

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

Total
$

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 (121,938)

 (121,938)

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 68,293

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

Anthony Greenaway

 68,293

(i)  The value of options granted during the period is recognised in compensation over the vesting period of the grant, in 

accordance with Australian accounting standards.

(ii)  The value of options lapsing during the period reflects the total fair value determined at issue date.

(e)  Other transactions with key management personnel
During the year ended 30 June 2016 the Group paid $13,628 to Ailie Services Pty Ltd, a related party of Mr Brian Dawes, 
for consultancy services provided over a nine day period which were deemed to be provided outside the ordinary 
requirements of Non-Executive Director duties. This transaction was made on the Company’s normal commercial terms 
and conditions.

The Group also paid $2,325 to Natalie Madden, a related party of Mr Daniel Madden, for financial consultancy services 
provided over a 2 month period January to February 2016. This transaction was made on the Company’s normal 
commercial terms and conditions.

There were no other transactions with key management personnel of the Group during the 2016 and 2015 financial years.

Page 30

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REMUNERATION REPORT

(f)  Shareholdings of key management personnel

Opening  
bal at 
1 July

Balance 
at date 
appointment

Shares 
received on 
exercise of 
options

Net other 
change

Balance on 
resignation

Balance at 
30 June

Number

Number

Number

Number

Number

Number

2016

Directors

Jeremy Kirkwood

N/A

119,000

Alan Senior

Gary Lethridge

Brian Dawes

Karen Gadsby

Executives

Daniel Madden

Shaun Vokes

Ben Wilson

Anthony Greenaway

2015

Directors

Alan Senior

Gary Lethridge

Brian Dawes

Karen Gadsby

Graeme Cameron

Executives

Daniel Madden

Graham Leaver

Peter Cash

116,666

1,666,667

353,333

311,334

–

–

–

–

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2,448,000

119,000

116,666

1,666,667

353,333

311,334

–

–

–

495,000

2,943,000

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

–

N/A

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

8,000

–

N/A

N/A

1,666,667

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

119,000

116,666

–

353,333

311,334

–

–

8,000

–

8,000

1,666,667

908,333

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

–

N/A

N/A

495,000

116,666

1,666,667

353,333

311,334

N/A

–

–

–

495,000

2,448,000

Page 31

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ REMUNERATION REPORT

(g)  Option holdings of key management personnel

Opening 
balance 
at 
1 July

Granted 
as 
remun-
eration

Options 
Exerc-
ised

Net other 
change

Balance 
on resig-
nation

Closing 
balance 
at 30 
June

Vested 
but not 
exerc-
isable

Vested 
during 
the year

Vested 
and 
exerc-
isable at 
30 June

Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number

2016

Directors

Jeremy Kirkwood

Alan Senior

N/A

750,000

Gary Lethridge

2,500,000

Brian Dawes

Karen Gadsby

500,000

500,000

Executives

Daniel Madden

1,000,000

Shaun Vokes

Ben Wilson

N/A

500,000

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Anthony Greenaway

N/A 500,000

–

–

–

–

N/A

–

N/A 750,000

– (1,250,000) 1,250,000 1,250,000

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

N/A 500,000

N/A 500,000

N/A 1,000,000

N/A

–

N/A 500,000

N/A 500,000

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

187,500

750,000

625,000 1,250,000

125,000

500,000

250,000

375,000

250,000 1,000,000

–

–

500,000

500,000

–

–

5,750,000

500,000

– (1,250,000) 1,250,000 5,000,000

– 1,937,500 4,375,000

2015

Directors

Alan Senior

750,000

–

–

–

N/A 750,000

Gary Lethridge

3,000,000 2,500,000

– (3,000,000)

N/A 2,500,000

Brian Dawes

500,000

–

Karen Gadsby

500,000

500,000

Graeme Cameron

2,000,000

Executives

Daniel Madden

1,000,000

–

–

Graham Leaver

–

500,000

–

–

–

N/A 500,000

(500,000)

N/A 500,000

– (1,000,000) 1,000,000

N/A

–

–

–

–

N/A 1,000,000

N/A 500,000

Peter Cash

1,000,000

–

– (1,000,000)

–

N/A

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

375,000

562,500

625,000

625,000

250,000

375,000

125,000

125,000

–

N/A

500,000

750,000

–

–

–

–

8,750,000 3,500,000

– (5,500,000) 1,000,000 5,750,000

– 1,875,000 2,437,500

This directors’ report is signed in accordance with a resolution of directors made pursuant to s.298(2) of the Corporations 
Act 2001.

On behalf of the Directors

Daniel Madden
Managing Director

Perth, 30 September 2016

Page 32

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION

AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 

AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 

As  lead  auditor  for  the  audit  of  the  consolidated  financial  report  of  Talisman  Mining  Limited  for  the 
year ended 30 June 2016, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no 
contraventions of: 

As  lead  auditor  for  the  audit  of  the  consolidated  financial  report  of  Talisman  Mining  Limited  for  the 
year ended 30 June 2016, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no 
contraventions of: 

a) 

a) 

the  auditor  independence  requirements  of  the  Corporations  Act  2001  in  relation  to  the  audit;  
and 

the  auditor  independence  requirements  of  the  Corporations  Act  2001  in  relation  to  the  audit;  
and 

b) 

b) 

any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit. 

any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit. 

Perth, Western Australia 
30 September 2016

Perth, Western Australia 
30 September 2016

M R W Ohm 
Partner

M R W Ohm 
Partner

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership)  ABN 22 193 232 714 
Level 4, 130 Stirling Street Perth WA 6000.  PO Box 8124 Perth BC 6849 Telephone +61 (08) 9227 7500. Fax +61 (08) 9227 7533. 
Email: hlb@hlbwa.com.au.  Website: http://www.hlb.com.au
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership)  ABN 22 193 232 714 
Level 4, 130 Stirling Street Perth WA 6000.  PO Box 8124 Perth BC 6849 Telephone +61 (08) 9227 7500. Fax +61 (08) 9227 7533. 
Email: hlb@hlbwa.com.au.  Website: http://www.hlb.com.au
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) is a member of 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) is a member of 

 International, a worldwide organisation of accounting firms and business advisers. 

 International, a worldwide organisation of accounting firms and business advisers. 

Page 33

TALISMAN MINING LTD 
 
 ■ INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT  

To the members of Talisman Mining Limited

Report on the Financial Report

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  financial  report  of  Talisman  Mining  Limited  (“the  company”),  which 
comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2016, the consolidated statement of 
comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated statement of 
cash flows for the year then ended, notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other 
explanatory information, and the directors’ declaration of the Group comprising the company and the entities 
it controlled at the year’s end or from time to time during the financial year. 

Directors’ responsibility for the financial report  

The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and 
fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for such 
internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that 
gives a true and fair view and is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.  

In Note 2(a), the directors also state that, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101: Presentation of 
Financial  Statements,  the  consolidated  financial  statements  comply  with  International  Financial  Reporting 
Standards. 

Auditor’s responsibility  

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit 
in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply with relevant ethical 
requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance 
about whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.  

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the 
financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the 
risks  of  material  misstatement  of  the  financial  report,  whether  due  to  fraud  or  error.  In  making  those  risk 
assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Group’s preparation of the financial report 
that gives a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, 
but  not  for  the  purpose  of  expressing  an  opinion  on  the  effectiveness  of  the  company’s  and  its  controlled 
entities’ internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and 
the  reasonableness  of  accounting  estimates  made  by  the  directors,  as  well  as  evaluating  the  overall 
presentation of the financial report.  

Our audit did not involve an analysis of the prudence of business decisions made by directors or management. 

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our 
audit opinion. 

Independence

In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001.

 HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership)  ABN 22 193 232 714 
Level 4, 130 Stirling Street Perth WA 6000.  PO Box 8124 Perth BC 6849 Telephone +61 (08) 9227 7500. Fax +61 (08) 9227 7533. 
Email: hlb@hlbwa.com.au.  Website: http://www.hlb.com.au
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) is a member of 

 International, a worldwide organisation of accounting firms and business advisers. 

Page 34

TALISMAN MINING LTD 
 
 
 ■ INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

Auditor’s opinion  

In our opinion:  

(a) 

the financial report of Talisman Mining Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:  

(i)  giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2016 and its performance 

for the year ended on that date; and  

(ii)  complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and  

(b) 

the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 
2(a).  

Report on the Remuneration Report 

We have audited the Remuneration Report included in the directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2016. 
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Remuneration Report 
in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on 
the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.  

Auditor’s opinion  

In our opinion, the Remuneration Report of Talisman Mining Limited for the year ended 30 June 2016 complies 
with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.

HLB Mann Judd 
Chartered Accountants

Perth, Western Australia 
30 September 2016

M R W Ohm 
Partner

Page 35

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ INDEX TO THE FINANCIAL REPORT

Directors’ Declaration 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 

37

38

39

40

41

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

42
42
General Information 
42
Significant Accounting Policies 
51
Voluntary Change in Accounting Policy 
54
Other Income 
54
Expenses 
54
Exploration Expenditure Expensed as Incurred 
55
Income Tax 
56
Cash and Cash Equivalents 
57
Trade and Other Receivables 
57
Other Financial Assets 
Property, Plant and Equipment 
58
Exploration, Evaluation and Development Expenditure  59
59
Trade and Other Payables 
59
Employee Benefits 
60
Provisions 
60
Issued Capital 
61
Accumulated Losses 
61
Earnings Per Share 
62
Commitments and Contingencies 
62
Financial Instruments 
65
Share-Based Payments 
68
Directors’ and Executives’ Disclosures 
69
Joint Operation 
70
Segment Reporting 
70
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets 
71
Parent Entity Disclosures 
72
Related Party Disclosure 
72
Acquisition of Assets 
73
Remuneration of Auditors 
73
Events Subsequent to Reporting Date 

Additional Securities Exchange Information 

74

Page 36

 ■ DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION

The directors declare that:
(a)  in the directors’ opinion, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and 

when they become due and payable.

(b)  in the directors’ opinion, the attached financial statements, notes and additional disclosures of the consolidated entity 

are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:

ii.  complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and

iii.  giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2016 and performance for the 

year then ended.

(c)  in the directors’ opinion the attached financial statements and notes thereto are in accordance with International 

Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

(d)  the directors have been given the declarations required by s.295A of the Corporations Act 2001.

Signed in accordance with a resolution of the directors made pursuant to s.295(5) of the Corporations Act 2001.

On behalf of the Directors

Daniel Madden,
Managing Director

Perth, 30 September 2016

Page 37

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016

Continuing operations

Other income

Employee benefits expense

Exploration expenditure expensed as incurred

Care and Maintenance expense

Occupancy expenses

Administrative expenses

Unwinding of discount on provisions

Depreciation and amortisation expense

Disposal of fixed assets

Impairment of available-for-sale financial assets

Loss before income tax expense

Income tax benefit

Loss after tax from continuing operations

Note

30 Jun 16
$

Restated*
30 Jun 15
$

4

5

6

5

15

10

7

 348,355

 367,760

 (813,267)

 (876,454)

 (5,809,259)

 (1,975,597)

 (431,236)

 (170,355)

 (830,568)

 (241,375)

 (59,752)

 – 

 (104,232)

 (169,386)

 (496,768)

 – 

 (90,623)

 1,818

 (3,000)

 (426,000)

 (8,010,457)

 (3,769,482)

 – 

 – 

 (8,010,457)

 (3,769,482)

Net loss for the period

 (8,010,457)

 (3,769,482)

Other comprehensive income for the period, net of tax

Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss

Net change in the fair value of available-for-sale financial assets

10

Other comprehensive income for the period, net of tax

Total comprehensive loss for the period

 (7,000)

 (7,000)

 (156,300)

 (156,300)

 (8,017,457)

 (3,925,782)

Loss per share:

Basic loss per share (cents per share)

Diluted loss per share (cents per share)

18

18

 (5.06)

 n/a

 (2.87)

 n/a

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

* Refer to Note 3 for details about restatements for the voluntary change in accounting policy.

Page 38

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 30 JUNE 2016

Assets

Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Trade and other receivables

Total Current Assets

Non-Current Assets

Receivables

Other financial assets

Property, plant and equipment

Deferred exploration and evaluation expenditure

Total Non-Current Assets

Total Assets

Liabilities

Current Liabilities

Trade and other payables

Employee benefits

Total Current Liabilities

Non-Current Liabilities

Deferred tax liabilities

Provisions

Total Non-Current Liabilities

Total Liabilities

Net Assets

Equity

Issued capital

Reserves

Accumulated losses

Total Equity

Note

30 Jun 16
$

Restated*
30 Jun 15
$

Restated*
1 Jul 14
$

8

9

9

10

11

12

13

14

7

15

16

17

17

 20,243,616

 4,865,632

 16,083,171

 257,490

 200,627

 370,086

 20,501,106

 5,066,259

 16,453,257

 60,184

 120,700

 60,184

 130,700

 2,788,756

 2,810,786

 70,184

 713,000

 261,096

 14,544,635

 14,000,000

 – 

 17,514,275

 17,001,670

 1,044,280

 38,015,381

 22,067,929

 17,497,537

362,219

 100,416

462,635

 380,886

 72,500

 453,386

 213,850

 33,428

 247,278

 – 

 – 

 8,287,209

 8,045,834

 8,287,209

 8,045,834

 – 

 – 

 – 

8,749,844

 8,499,220

 247,278

29,265,537

 13,568,709

 17,250,259

 60,881,617

 37,404,278

 37,404,278

 409,589

 469,832

 1,923,900

 (32,025,669)

 (24,305,401)

 (22,077,919)

 29,265,537

 13,568,709

 17,250,259

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

* Refer to Note 3 for details about restatements for the voluntary change in accounting policy.

Page 39

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016

Issued  
Capital
$

Accumulated 
Losses
$

Asset 
Revaluation 
Reserve
$

Share-based 
Payments 
Reserve
$

Total Equity
$

Balance at 1 July 2014

 37,404,278

 7,103,801

 177,500

 1,746,400

 46,431,979

Change in accounting policy  
(note 3(b))

Restated Total Equity at 
1 July 2014

Loss for the period

Net change in fair value of  
available-for-sale financial assets

Total comprehensive 
income/(loss) for the period

Recognition of share-based 
payments

Unlisted options lapsing

 – 

 (29,181,720)

 – 

 – 

 (29,181,720)

 37,404,278

 (22,077,919)

 177,500

 1,746,400

17,250,259

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 (3,769,482)

 – 

 – 

 (156,300)

 (3,769,482)

 (156,300)

 – 

 – 

 – 

 (3,769,482)

 (156,300)

 (3,925,782)

 – 

 1,542,000

 – 

 – 

 244,232

244,232

 (1,542,000)

 – 

Balance at 30 June 2015

 37,404,278

 (24,305,401)

 21,200

 448,632

 13,568,709

Balance at 1 July 2015

 37,404,278

 (24,305,401)

 21,200

 448,632

 13,568,709

Loss for the period

Net change in fair value of  
available-for-sale financial assets

Total comprehensive 
income/(loss) for the period

 – 

 – 

 – 

 (8,010,457)

 – 

 – 

 (7,000)

 (8,010,457)

 (7,000)

Shares issued during the year

 23,477,339

Recognition of share-based 
payments

Unlisted options lapsing

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 290,189

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 (8,010,457)

 (7,000)

 (8,017,457)

 23,477,339

 236,946

 (290,189)

 236,946

 – 

Balance at 30 June 2016

 60,881,617

 (32,025,669)

 14,200

 395,389

 29,265,537

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

* Refer to Note 3 for details about restatements for the voluntary change in accounting policy.

Page 40

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016

Cash flows from operating activities

Payments to suppliers and employees

Payments for exploration and evaluation

Interest received

Interest paid

Note

30 Jun 16
$

Restated 
30 Jun 15
$

inflows/(outflows)

 (1,584,750)

 (1,264,360)

 (6,172,670)

 (1,784,376)

 242,132

 440,982

 – 

 (225)

Net cash used in operating activities

8

 (7,515,288)

 (2,607,979)

Cash flows from investing activities

Payments for exploration and evaluation expenditure

Payments for property, plant and equipment

Proceeds from sale of plant and equipment

Net cash used in investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Proceeds from issue of shares

Payments for share issue costs

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net increase /(decrease) in cash held

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

 (544,634)

 (5,954,165)

 (39,433)

 (2,657,213)

 – 

 1,818

 (584,067)

 (8,609,560)

 24,712,989

 (1,235,650)

 23,477,339

 – 

 – 

 – 

 15,377,984

 (11,217,539)

 4,865,632

 16,083,171

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

8

 20,243,616

 4,865,632

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

* Refer to Note 3 for details about restatements for the voluntary change in accounting policy.

Page 41

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  GENERAL INFORMATION
Talisman Mining Limited (the Company) is a public company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (trading under the 
symbol “TLM”) and operating in Australia.

Talisman Mining Limited’s Registered Office and its principal place of business are as follows:

Registered Office
6 Centro Avenue
Subiaco
Western Australia 6008

Principal place of business
6 Centro Avenue
Subiaco
Western Australia 6008

The nature of the operations and principal activities of the Company are described in the Directors’ Report.

2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a)  Basis of preparation
This financial report is a general purpose financial report, which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of 
the Corporations Act 2001, Accounting Standards and Interpretations and to comply with other requirements of the law.

The accounting policies detailed below have been consistently applied to all of the years presented unless otherwise 
stated. The financial statements are for the Group consisting of Talisman Mining Limited and its subsidiaries. The financial 
report comprises the consolidated financial statements for the Group for the year ended 30 June 2016. The Company is a 
for-profit entity for the purposes of preparing the consolidated financial statements.

The financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for available-for-sale investments which 
have been measured at fair value. Historical cost is based on the fair values of the consideration given in exchange for 
goods and services.

The financial report is presented in Australian dollars.

(i)  Adoption of new and revised standards

Standards and Interpretations applicable to 30 June 2016

In the year ended 30 June 2016, the Directors have reviewed all of the new and revised Standards and Interpretations 
issued by the AASB that are relevant to the Company and effective for the current annual reporting period.

As a result of this review, the Directors have determined that there is no material impact of the new and revised Standards 
and Interpretations on the Company and, therefore, no material change is necessary to Group accounting policies.

Standards and Interpretations in issue not yet adopted

The Directors have also reviewed all new Standards and Interpretations that have been issued but are not yet effective 
for the year ended 30 June 2016. As a result of this review the Directors have determined that there is no material impact, 
of the new and revised Standards and Interpretations on the Group and, therefore, no change is necessary to Group 
accounting policies.

(ii)  Statement of compliance

The financial report was authorised for issue on 30 September 2016.

The financial report complies with Australian Accounting Standards, which include Australian equivalents to International 
Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS). Compliance with AIFRS ensures that the financial report, comprising the financial 
statements and notes thereto, complies with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

(iii)  Significant accounting estimates and judgements

The application of accounting policies requires the use of judgements, estimates and assumptions about carrying values 
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are 
based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these 
estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions are recognised in the period in 
which the estimate is revised if it affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision 
affects both current and future periods.

Page 42

TALISMAN MINING LTD2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Share-based payment transactions:

The Group measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity 
instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by utilising a Black and Scholes model, 
using the assumptions detailed in Note 21.

Exploration and evaluation expenditure carried forward

The recoverability of the carrying amount of exploration and evaluation expenditure carried forward has been reviewed 
by the Directors. The recoverability of the carrying amount of the exploration and evaluation assets is dependent on the 
successful development and commercial exploitation, or alternatively, sale of the respective area of interest.

The Group reviews the carrying value of exploration and evaluation expenditure on a regular basis to determine whether 
economic quantities of reserves have been found or whether further exploration and evaluation work is underway or 
planned to support continued carry forward of capitalised costs. This assessment requires judgement as to the status of 
the individual projects and their estimated recoverable amount.

Impairment of available-for-sale financial assets

The Group follows the guidance of AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement to determine when an 
available-for-sale financial asset is impaired. This determination requires significant judgement. In making this judgement, 
the Group evaluates, among other factors, the duration and extent to which the fair value of an investment is less than its 
cost and the financial health of and short-term business outlook for the investee, including factors such as industry and 
sector performance, changes in technology and operational and financing cash flows.

Provision for mine closure

The provision for mine closure is based on the present value of the estimated cost of restoring the environmental 
disturbance that has occurred up to the reporting date. Significant estimates and assumptions are made in determining 
the provision for rehabilitation of the mine as there are numerous factors that will affect the ultimate liability payable. These 
factors include estimates of the extent and costs of rehabilitation activities, technological changes, regulatory changes, 
cost increases as compared to inflation rates and changes in discount rates. These uncertainties may result in future actual 
expenditure differing from the amounts currently provided. The provision at reporting date represents management’s best 
estimate of the present value of the future rehabilitation costs required.

(b)  Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and entities controlled by the 
Company and its subsidiaries. Control is achieved when the Company:

•  has power over the investee;
• 
•  has the ability to use its power over the investee to affect its returns.

is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and

The Company reassess whether or not it controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to 
one or more of the three elements listed above.

When the Company has less than a majority of the voting rights if an investee, it has the power over the investee when 
the voting rights are sufficient to give it the practical ability to direct the relevant activities of the investee unilaterally. The 
Company considers all relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether or not the Company’s voting rights are 
sufficient to give it power, including,

• 

the size of the Company’s holding of voting rights relative to the size and dispersion of holdings of the other vote 
holders;

•  potential voting rights held by the Company, other vote holders or other parties; rights arising from other contractual 

arrangements; and

•  any additional facts and circumstances that indicate that the Company has, or does not have, the current ability 
to direct the relevant activities at the time that decisions need to be made, including voting patterns at previous 
shareholder meetings.

Consolidation of a subsidiary begins when the Company obtains control over the subsidiary and ceases when the 
Company loses control of the subsidiary. Specifically income and expenses of a subsidiary acquired or disposed of during 
the year are included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income from the date the Company gains control 
until the date when the Company ceases to control the subsidiary.

Page 43

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(c)  Segment reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision 
maker. The chief operating decision maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the 
operating segments, has been identified as the Board of Directors of the Company.

(d)  Revenue recognition
Revenue is measured at fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Amounts disclosed as revenue are net of 
returns, trade allowances, rebates and amounts collected on behalf of third parties.

Interest income

Interest income from a financial asset is recognised when it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Group 
and the amount of revenue can be reliably measured. Interest income is accrued on a time basis, by reference to the 
principal outstanding and at the effective interest rate applicable, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future 
cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to that assets’ net carrying amount on initial recognition.

(e)  Income tax
The income tax expense or benefit for the period is the tax payable on the current period’s taxable income based on the 
applicable income tax rate for each jurisdiction adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to 
temporary difference and to unused tax losses.

The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the end of 
the reporting period in the countries where the Company’s subsidiaries and associates operate and generate taxable 
income. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax 
regulation is subject to interpretation. It establishes provisions where appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be 
paid to the tax authorities.

Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered 
from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted 
or substantively enacted by the balance date.

Deferred income tax is provided on all temporary differences at the balance date between the tax bases of assets and 
liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.

Deferred income tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences except:

•  when the deferred income tax liability arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is 
not a business combination and that, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable 
profit or loss; or

•  when the taxable temporary difference is associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates or interests in joint 
ventures, and the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference can be controlled and it is probable that the 
temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax assets 
and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible 
temporary differences and the carry-forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilised, except:

•  when the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial recognition 
of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects 
neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; or

•  when the deductible temporary difference is associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates or interests 
in joint ventures, in which case a deferred tax asset is only recognised to the extent that it is probable that the 
temporary difference will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the 
temporary difference can be utilised.

The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance date and reduced to the extent that it is 
no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be 
utilised.

Page 44

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Unrecognised deferred income tax assets are reassessed at each balance date and are recognised to the extent that it has 
become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the 
asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted 
at the balance date.

Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in profit or loss.

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset only if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets 
against current tax liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the same taxable entity and the same 
taxation authority.

Tax consolidation legislation

The Company and its 100% owned Australian resident subsidiaries have implemented the tax consolidation legislation. 
Current and deferred tax amounts are accounted for in each individual entity as if each entity continued to act as a 
taxpayer on its own.

The Company recognises its own current and deferred tax amounts and those current tax liabilities, current tax assets and 
deferred tax assets arising from unused tax credits and unused tax losses which it has assumed from its controlled entities 
within the tax consolidated Group.

Assets or liabilities arising under tax funding agreements with the tax consolidated entities are recognised as amounts 
payable or receivable from or payable to other entities in the Group. Any difference between the amounts receivable or 
payable under the tax funding agreement are recognised as a contribution to (or distribution from) controlled entities in the 
tax consolidated Group.

(f)  Other taxes
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST except:

•  when the GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in 

which case the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as 
applicable; and
receivables and payables, which are stated with the amount of GST included.

• 

The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or 
payables in the statement of financial position.

Cash flows are included in the statement of cash flows on a gross basis and the GST component of cash flows arising from 
investing and financing activities, which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority are classified as operating 
cash flows.

Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation 
authority.

(g)  Impairment of tangible and intangible assets other than goodwill
The Group assesses at each balance date whether there is an indication that an asset may be impaired. If any such 
indication exists, or when annual impairment testing for an asset is required, the Group makes an estimate of the asset’s 
recoverable amount. An asset’s recoverable amount is the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and its value in use and 
is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those 
from other assets or groups of assets and the asset’s value in use cannot be estimated to be close to its fair value. In such 
cases the asset is tested for impairment as part of the cash-generating unit to which it belongs. When the carrying amount 
of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset or cash-generating unit is considered 
impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount.

In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount 
rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. Impairment 
losses relating to continuing operations are recognised in those expense categories consistent with the function of the 
impaired asset unless the asset is carried at revalued amount (in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation 
decrease).

Page 45

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
An assessment is also made at each balance date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognised 
impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount is 
estimated. A previously recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to 
determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognised. If that is the case the carrying 
amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount 
that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in prior years. 
Such reversal is recognised in profit or loss unless the asset is carried at revalued amount, in which case the reversal is 
treated as a revaluation increase. After such a reversal the depreciation charge is adjusted in future periods to allocate the 
asset’s revised carrying amount, less any residual value, on a systematic basis over its remaining useful life.

(h)  Cash and cash equivalents
Cash comprises cash at bank and in hand. Cash equivalents are short term, highly liquid investments that are readily 
convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. Bank overdrafts 
are shown within borrowings in current liabilities in the statement of financial position.

For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and cash equivalents as 
defined above, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.

(i)  Financial assets
Financial assets in the scope of AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement are classified as either 
financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, or available-for-
sale investments, as appropriate. When financial assets are recognised initially, they are measured at fair value plus, in the 
case of investments not at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transaction costs. The Group determines 
the classification of its financial assets after initial recognition and, when allowed and appropriate, re-evaluates this 
designation at each financial year-end. All regular way purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on the trade 
date i.e. the date that the Group commits to purchase the asset. Regular way purchases or sales are purchases or sales of 
financial assets under contracts that require delivery of the assets within the period established generally by regulation or 
convention in the marketplace.

Available-for-sale investments
Available-for-sale investments are those non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or are not 
classified as any other category. After initial recognition available-for sale investments are measured at fair value with gains 
or losses being recognised as a separate component of equity until the investment is derecognised or until the investment 
is determined to be impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity is recognised in profit 
or loss.

The fair value of investments that are actively traded in organised financial markets is determined by reference to quoted 
market bid prices at the close of business on the balance date. For investments with no active market, fair value is 
determined using valuation techniques. Such techniques include using recent arm’s length market transactions, reference 
to the current market value of another instrument that is substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis and option 
pricing models.

Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an 
active market. Such assets are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

Impairment	of	financial	assets

(j)	
The Group assesses at each balance date whether a financial asset or Group of financial assets is impaired.

Available-for-sale investments
If there is objective evidence that an available-for-sale investment is impaired, an amount comprising the difference 
between its cost (net of any principal repayment and amortisation) and its current fair value, less any impairment loss 
previously recognised in profit or loss, is transferred from equity to the statement of comprehensive income. Reversals 
of impairment losses for equity instruments classified as available-for-sale are not recognised in profit. Reversals of 
impairment losses for debt instruments are reversed through profit or loss if the increase in an instrument’s fair value can 
be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised in profit or loss.

Loans and receivables
Trade receivables, loans, and other receivables are recorded at amortised cost less impairment.

Page 46

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(k)  Interests in joint operations
A joint operation is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the 
assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating to the arrangement. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of 
control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require unanimous consent of the 
parties sharing control.

When a group entity undertakes its activities under joint operations, the Group as a joint operator recognises in relation to 
its interests in a joint operation:

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

its assets, including its share of any assets held jointly;
its liabilities, including its share of any liabilities incurred jointly;
its revenue from the sale of its share of the output arising from the joint operation;
its share of the revenue from the sale of the output by the joint operation; and
its expenses, including its share of any expenses incurred jointly.

The Group accounts for the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses relating to its interest in a joint operation in 
accordance with the relevant standards and interpretations applicable to the particular assets, liabilities, revenues and 
expenses.

When a group entity transacts with a joint operation in which a group entity is a joint operator (such as a sale or 
contribution of assets), the Group is considered to be conducting the transaction with the other parties to the joint 
operation, and gains and losses resulting from the transactions are recognised in the Group’s consolidated financial 
statements only to the extent of the other parties’ interests in the joint operation.

When a group entity transacts with a joint operation in which a group entity is a joint operator (such as a purchase of 
assets), the Group does not recognise its share of the gains and losses until it resells those assets to a third party.

(l)  Property, plant and equipment
Plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. Such cost 
includes the cost of replacing parts that are eligible for capitalisation when the cost of replacing the parts is incurred. 
Similarly, when each major inspection is performed, its cost is recognised in the carrying amount of the plant and 
equipment as a replacement only if it is eligible for capitalisation.

Land and buildings are measured at fair value less accumulated depreciation on buildings and less any impairment losses 
recognised after the date of the revaluation.

Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets as follows:

Mine site plant and equipment
Office furniture and equipment
Motor vehicles
Leasehold improvements

Units of Production
2-6 years
8-10 years
10 years

The assets’ residual values, useful lives and amortisation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each 
financial year end.

Impairment

The carrying values of plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment at each balance date, with recoverable amount 
being estimated when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired.

The recoverable amount of plant and equipment is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing 
value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects 
current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.

For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, recoverable amount is determined for the cash-
generating unit to which the asset belongs, unless the asset’s value in use can be estimated to approximate fair value.

Page 47

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
An impairment exists when the carrying value of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds its estimated recoverable 
amount. The asset or cash-generating unit is then written down to its recoverable amount.

For plant and equipment, impairment losses are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income. However, because 
land and buildings are measured at revalued amounts, impairment losses on land and buildings are treated as a revaluation 
decrement.

Derecognition and disposal
An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no further future economic benefits are 
expected from its use or disposal.

Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and 
the carrying amount of the asset) is included in profit or loss in the year the asset is derecognised.

(m) Exploration and evaluation expenditure
Exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources is the search for mineral resources after the entity has obtained legal 
rights to explore in a specific area, as well as the determination of the technical feasibility and commercial viability of 
extracting the mineral resource.

Exploration and evaluation expenditure is expensed to the profit or loss as incurred except in the following circumstances in 
which case the expenditure may be capitalised:

•  The existence of a mineral deposit has been established however additional expenditure is required to determine 

the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extraction and it is anticipated that future economic benefits are 
more likely than not to be generated as a result of the expenditure; and

•  The exploration and evaluation activity is within an area of interest which was acquired as an asset acquisition or in 

a business combination and measured at fair value on acquisition.

A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward 
costs in relation to that area of interest. An impairment exists when the carrying value of expenditure exceeds its estimated 
recoverable amount. The area of interest is then written down to its recoverable amount and the impairment losses are 
recognised in the statement of comprehensive income.

Upon approval for the commercial development of an area of interest, exploration and evaluation assets are tested for impairment 
and transferred to ‘Mine properties in development’. No amortisation is charged during the exploration and evaluation phase.

(n)  Trade and other payables
Trade payables and other payables are carried at amortised cost and represent liabilities for goods and services provided 
to the Group prior to the end of the financial year that are unpaid and arise when the Group becomes obliged to make 
future payments in respect of the purchase of these goods and services. Trade and other payables are presented as 
current liabilities unless payment is not due within 12 months.

(o)  Leases
Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of 
ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases.

Assets held under finance leases are initially recognised at their fair value or, if lower, the present value of the minimum 
lease payments, each determined at the inception of the lease. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in the 
statement of financial position as a finance lease obligation.

Lease payments are apportioned between finance charges and reduction of the lease obligation so as to achieve a 
constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are charged directly against income, 
unless they are directly attributable to qualifying assets, in which case they are capitalised.

Finance lease assets are depreciated on a straight line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset.

Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense on a straight line basis over the lease term, except where 
another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leased asset are 
consumed. In the event that lease incentives are received to enter into operating leases, such incentives are recognised as 
a liability. The aggregate benefit of incentives is recognised as a reduction of rental expense on a straight-line basis, except 
where another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leased 
asset are consumed.

Page 48

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(p)   Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is 
probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable 
estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses.

When the Group expects some or all of a provision to be reimbursed, for example under an insurance contract, the 
reimbursement is recognised as a separate asset but only when the reimbursement is virtually certain. The expense 
relating to any provision is presented in the statement of comprehensive income net of any reimbursement.

Provisions are measured at the present value or management’s best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the 
present obligation at the end of the reporting period.

If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pre-tax rate that reflects the 
risks specific to the liability.

When discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as an interest expense.

(q)  Provision for mine closure
A provision for mine closure is recognised when there is a present obligation as a result of development activities 
undertaken, it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and the amount of 
the provision can be measured reliably. The estimated future obligations include the costs of abandoning sites, removing 
facilities and restoring the affected areas.

The provision for mine closure costs is the best estimate of the present value of the expenditure required to settle the 
restoration obligation at the balance date. Future restoration costs are reviewed annually and any changes in the estimate 
are reflected in the present value of the restoration provision at each balance date.

The initial estimate of the mine closure provision is capitalised into the cost of the related asset and amortised on the same 
basis as the related asset, unless the present obligation arises from the production of inventory in the period, in which case 
the amount is included in the cost of production for the period. Changes in the estimate of the provision for restoration 
and rehabilitation are treated in the same manner, except that the unwinding of the effect of discounting on the provision is 
recognised as a finance cost rather than being capitalised into the cost of the related asset.

(r)  Employee leave benefits

Wages, salaries, annual leave and sick leave

Liabilities accruing to employees in respect of wages and salaries, annual leave, long service leave and sick leave expected 
to be settled within 12 months of the balance date are recognised in other payables in respect of employees’ services up to 
the balance date. They are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. Liabilities for non-
accumulating sick leave are recognised when the leave is taken and are measured at the rates paid or payable.

Liabilities accruing to employees in respect of wages and salaries, annual leave, long service leave and sick leave not 
expected to be settled within 12 months of the balance date are recognised in non-current other payables in respect of 
employees’ services up to the balance date. They are measured as the present value of the estimated future outflows to be 
made by the Group.

(s)  Share-based payment transactions

Equity settled transactions

The Group provides benefits to employees (including senior executives) of the Group in the form of share-based payments, 
whereby employees render services in exchange for shares or rights over shares (equity-settled transactions).

The cost of these equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value of the equity 
instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined using a Black-Scholes model, further details 
of which are given in Note 21.

In valuing equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any performance conditions, other than conditions linked to 
the price of the shares of the Company (market conditions) if applicable.

Page 49

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period in 
which the performance and/or service conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become 
fully entitled to the award (the vesting period).

The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each balance date until vesting date reflects:
(i) 
(ii)  the Group’s best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. No adjustment is made for the 

the extent to which the vesting period has expired; and

likelihood of market performance conditions being met as the effect of these conditions is included in the determination 
of fair value at grant date. The statement of comprehensive income charge or credit for a period represents the 
movement in cumulative expense recognised as at the beginning and end of that period.

No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is only conditional upon 
a market condition.

If the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, as a minimum an expense is recognised as if the terms had not been 
modified. In addition, an expense is recognised for any modification that increases the total fair value of the share-based 
payment arrangement, or is otherwise beneficial to the employee, as measured at the date of modification.

If an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not yet 
recognised for the award is recognised immediately. However, if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award and 
designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new award are treated as if they were 
a modification of the original award, as described in the previous paragraph.

The dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding options is reflected as additional share dilution in the computation of earnings per 
share, refer Note 18.

Equity-settled share-based payments are measured at fair value at the date of grant by use of the Black Scholes model. 
The expected life used in the model has been adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non-
transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioral considerations.

The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is expensed on a straight-line basis 
over the vesting period, based on the entity’s estimate of shares that will eventually vest.

(t)   Issued capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are 
shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new 
shares or options for the acquisition of a new business are not included in the cost of acquisition as part of the purchase 
consideration.

(u)  Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated as net profit attributable to members of the parent, adjusted to exclude any costs 
of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends, divided by the weighted average number of 
ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element.

Diluted earnings per share is calculated as net profit attributable to members of the parent, adjusted for:

•  costs of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends;
• 

the after tax effect of dividends and interest associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares that have been 
recognised as expenses; and

•  other non-discretionary changes in revenues or expenses during the period that would result from the dilution of 

potential ordinary shares; divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares and dilutive potential ordinary 
shares, adjusted for any bonus element.

The Group does not report diluted earnings per share on incurring an operating loss for the financial year.

(v)	 Parent	entity	financial	information
The financial information for the parent entity, Talisman Mining Limited, disclosed in Note 26 has been prepared on the 
same basis as the consolidated financial statements, except as set out below.

Investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint venture entities
Investments in subsidiaries, and joint venture entities are accounted for at cost in the parent entity’s financial statements.

Page 50

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS3.  VOLUNTARY CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY
(a)  Exploration and Evaluation Accounting Policy
The financial report has been prepared on the basis of a retrospectively applied voluntary change in accounting policy 
related to exploration and evaluation expenditure.

The new accounting policy is to expense exploration and evaluation expenditure to the profit or loss as incurred except in 
the following circumstances in which case the expenditure may be capitalised:

•  The existence of a mineral deposit has been established however additional expenditure is required to determine 

the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extraction and it is anticipated that future economic benefits are 
more likely than not to be generated as a result of the expenditure; and

•  The exploration and evaluation activity is within an area of interest which was acquired as an asset acquisition or in 

a business combination and measured at fair value on acquisition.

The previous accounting policy was to capitalise exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred and carry forward as 
an asset when rights to tenure of the area of interest were current and costs were expected to be recouped through 
the successful development of the area of interest (or alternatively by its sale), or where activities in the area had not yet 
reached a stage which permitted a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable 
reserves and active operations were continuing.

Management believes that this change in policy will result in more relevant and reliable information in the financial report. 
Recognition criteria of exploration and evaluation assets are inherently uncertain and expensing as incurred results in 
a more transparent balance sheet and profit or loss. Furthermore, the change in policy aids in accountability of line 
management’s expenditures and the newly adopted policy is consistent with those of many other exploration and 
mining companies.

Page 51

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS3.  VOLUNTARY CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY (CONTINUED)

(b)  Impact on Financial Statements
As a result of the change in the accounting policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure, prior year financial statements 
had to be restated. The amounts disclosed for the 2015 reporting period and in the balance sheets as at 1 July 2014 and 
30 June 2015 are after the change in accounting policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure.

Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income

Continuing operations

Other income

Employee benefits expense

Prior year restatement

Previously 
stated
30 Jun 15
$

Profit 
Increase/ 
(Decrease)
$

Restated*
30 Jun 15
$

 367,760

 (876,454)

 – 

 – 

 367,760

 (876,454)

Exploration expenditure expensed as incurred

 (506,716)

 (1,468,881)

 (1,975,597)

Impairment of exploration expenditure

Care and Maintenance expense

Occupancy expenses

Administrative expenses

Depreciation and amortisation expense

Disposal of fixed assets

Impairment of available-for-sale financial assets

Loss before income tax expense

Income tax benefit

 (7,314,675)

 7,314,675

 (104,232)

 (169,386)

 (496,768)

 (90,623)

 1,818

 (426,000)

–

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 (104,232)

 (169,386)

 (496,768)

 (90,623)

 1,818

 (426,000)

 (9,615,276)

 5,845,794

 (3,769,482)

 2,678,373

 (2,678,373)

 – 

Loss after tax from continuing operations

 (6,936,903)

 3,167,421

 (3,769,482)

Net loss for the period

 (6,936,903)

 3,167,421

 (3,769,482)

Other comprehensive income for the period, net of tax

Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss

Net change in the fair value of available-for-sale financial assets

Other comprehensive income for the period, net of tax

 (156,300)

 (156,300)

 – 

 – 

 (156,300)

 (156,300)

Total comprehensive loss for the period

 (7,093,203)

 3,167,421

 (3,925,782)

Loss per share:

Basic loss per share (cents per share)

Diluted loss per share (cents per share)

 (5.27)

 n/a

 (2.87)

 n/a

Page 52

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS3.  VOLUNTARY CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY (CONTINUED)
Balance sheet

Previously 
stated
30 Jun 15
$

Increase/ 
(Decrease)
$

Restated
30 Jun 15
$

Previously 
stated
1 Jul 14
$

Increase/ 
(Decrease)
$

Restated
1 Jul 14
$

Assets

Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Trade and other receivables

Total Current Assets

 4,865,632

 200,627

 5,066,259

Non-Current Assets

Receivables

Other financial assets

 60,184

 130,700

Property, plant and equipment

 2,810,786

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 4,865,632  16,083,171

 200,627

 370,086

 5,066,259  16,453,257

 – 

 16,083,171

 – 

 370,086

 – 

 16,453,257

 60,184

 70,184

 130,700

 713,000

 2,810,786

 261,096

 – 

 – 

 – 

 70,184

 713,000

 261,096

Deferred exploration and evaluation 
expenditure

 40,084,747  (26,084,747)

 14,000,000  31,930,540  (31,930,540)

 – 

Total Non-Current Assets

 43,086,417  (26,084,747)

 17,001,670  32,974,820  (31,930,540)

 1,044,280

Total Assets

 48,152,676  (26,084,747)  22,067,929  49,428,077  (31,930,540)

 17,497,537

Liabilities

Current Liabilities

Trade and other payables

Employee benefits

Total Current Liabilities

Non-Current Liabilities

 380,886

 72,500

 453,386

 – 

 – 

 – 

 380,886

 213,850

 72,500

 33,428

 453,386

 247,278

 – 

 – 

 – 

 213,850

 33,428

 247,278

Deferred tax liabilities

 70,449

 (70,449)

 – 

 2,748,820

 (2,748,820)

Provisions

 8,045,834

 – 

 8,045,834

 – 

 – 

Total Non-Current Liabilities

 8,116,283

 (70,449)

 8,045,834

 2,748,820

 (2,748,820)

 – 

 – 

 – 

Total Liabilities

 8,569,669

 (70,449)

 8,499,220

 2,996,098

 (2,748,820)

 247,278

Net Assets

 39,583,007  (26,014,298)  13,568,709  46,431,979  (29,181,720)

 17,250,259

Equity

Issued capital

Reserves

Retained earnings

Total Equity

 37,404,278

 469,831

 – 

 37,404,278  37,404,278

 – 

 469,832

 1,923,900

 – 

 37,404,278

 – 

 1,923,900

 1,708,898  (26,014,299)  (24,305,401)

 7,103,801  (29,181,720)  (22,077,919)

 39,583,007  (26,014,299)  13,568,709  46,431,979  (29,181,720)

 17,250,259

Page 53

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS3.  VOLUNTARY CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY (CONTINUED)
Consolidated statement of cash flows

Exploration and evaluation expenditure that is expensed is included as part of cash flows from operating activities whereas 
exploration and evaluation expenditure that is capitalised is included as part of cash flows from investing activities. This has 
resulted in additional cash outflows from operating activities of $1,784,376 for the year ended 30 June 2015. This has also 
resulted in a corresponding reduction of $1,784,376 being reflected in the net cash outflows from investing activities for the 
same reporting period

4.  OTHER INCOME

Bank interest received and receivable

Other income

5.  EXPENSES

Loss for the year includes the following expenses:

Non-cash share based payment expense

Other employee benefits

Operating lease rental expense

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 348,355

 359,760

 – 

 8,000

 348,355

 367,760

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 236,946

576,321

 170,355

 244,231

632,223

 169,386

6.  EXPLORATION EXPENDITURE EXPENSED AS INCURRED

Project 
Expenditure 
expensed in 
the period

Life to date 
project 
expenditure 
previously 
expensed

Project 
Expenditure 
expensed in 
the period

Restated* 
Life to date 
project 
expenditure 
previously 
expensed

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 2,424,580

 1,351,071

 1,351,071

 – 

 3,376,499

 21,159,727

 3,817

 586,983

 3,248,716

 1,862

 5,046

 511

 21,157,865

 581,937

 3,248,205

 – 

 – 

 617,107

6,942,534

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 4,363

Sinclair

Springfield

Halloween West JV

Halloween(i)

Murchison Exploration Projects(ii)

Other Exploration Expenses

 5,809,259

 26,346,497

 1,975,597

 31,930,541

(i)  The Halloween Project was surrendered during the reporting period.

(ii)  The Murchison Exploration Projects were relinquished during the financial year ended 30 June 2015.

Page 54

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS7. 

INCOME TAX

30 Jun 16
$

Restated 
30 Jun 15
$

The prima facie income tax expense on pre-tax accounting loss from operations 
reconciles to the income tax benefit in the financial statements as follows:

Accounting loss before income tax

 (8,010,457)

 (3,769,482)

Income tax benefit calculated at 30% (2015: 30%)

Non-deductible expenses

Tax losses and deferred tax balances not recognised.

 (2,403,137)

 (1,130,845)

 72,541

 73,270

 2,330,596

 1,057,575

Income tax benefit reported in the statement of comprehensive income

 – 

 – 

Unrecognised deferred tax balances

Deferred tax assets compromise of:

Tax losses carried forward

Impairment of financial assets

Other deferred tax balances

Deferred tax liabilities comprise of:

Exploration expenditure capitalised

Other deferred tax balances

30 Jun 16
$

Restated 
30 Jun 15
$

 11,284,733

 9,927,377

 2,150,550

 2,149,650

 405,345

 26,953

 13,840,628

 12,103,980

 1,366,250

 36,711

 1,402,961

 177,050

 4,686

 181,736

Income tax expense not recognised directly in equity during the year

 370,695 

 – 

Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of these items because it is not probable that future profits will be 
available against which the Group can utilize the benefits thereof.

Deferred tax liabilities have not been recognised in respect of these taxable temporary differences as the entity is able to 
control the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse 
in the foreseeable future.

Page 55

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS8.  CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(a)  Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents

Cash at bank and on hand

Short-term deposits

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 1,235,325

 348,229

 19,008,291

 4,517,403

 20,243,616

 4,865,632

(b)	 Reconciliation	of	loss	for	the	year	to	net	cash	flow	from	operating	activities

30 Jun 16
$

Restated 
30 Jun 15
$

Loss for the year after tax

 (8,010,457)

 (3,769,482)

Impairment of available-for-sale financial assets

Depreciation and amortisation

Disposal of fixed assets

Unwinding discount rate on mine closure provision

Equity settled share-based payments

Changes in net assets and liabilties

(Increase)/decrease in assets:

Trade and other receivables

Increase/(decrease) in liabilities:

Trade and other payables

Provisions

Net cash used in operating activities

 3,000

 59,752

 – 

 241,375

 236,946

 426,000

 90,623

 (1,818)

 – 

 244,231

 (56,255)

 179,160

 (17,565)

 27,916

 184,235

 39,072

 (7,515,288)

 (2,607,979)

(c)	 Non-cash	financing	and	investing	activities
There were no non-cash financing and investing activities during the current or prior year.

Page 56

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS9.  TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

Current

Goods and services tax recoverable

Other debtors

Other debtors – security bonds

Prepayments and accrued income

Non-Current

Other debtors – security bonds

Due to the nature of the Group’s receivables, no ageing is presented.

10.  OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 65,043

 969

 – 

 191,478

 257,490

 22,970

 35,598

 – 

 142,059

 200,627

 60,184

 60,184

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

Non-Current

Available-for-sale listed investments carried at fair value

 120,700

 130,700

Available-for-sale investments consist of investments in ordinary shares, and therefore have no fixed maturity date or 
coupon rate. The carrying amount of financial assets recorded in the financial statements represents their net fair values, 
determined in accordance with the accounting policies disclosed in Note 2.

At year end, an assessment of the fair value of all available for sale investments resulted in an impairment charge of $3,000 
(2015: $426,000) and a loss of $7,000 (2015: loss of $156,300) being recognised in the statement of comprehensive 
income in the line item “Net change in the fair value of available-for-sale financial assets”. The Group’s assessment of the 
fair value was made in accordance with AASB 139 and was based on the share price of the investment below cost as 
quoted by the Australian Securities Exchange.

The Directors consider that the carrying amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded in the financial 
statements approximate their fair value.

Page 57

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS11.  PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Office  
furniture and 
equipment
$

Leasehold 
improvements
$

Plant and 
equipment
$

Motor  
vehicles
$

Total
$

Year ended 30 June 2016

At 1 July 2015, net of 
accumulated depreciation

Additions

Disposals

Depreciation charge for the year

Year ended 30 June 2015

At 1 July 2014, net of 
accumulated depreciation

Additions

Disposals

Depreciation charge for the year

At 30 June 2016

Cost or fair value

Accumulated depreciation

Net carrying amount

At 30 June 2015

Cost or fair value

Accumulated depreciation

Net carrying amount

 53,466

 37,722

 – 

 (27,046)

 64,142

 102,600

 4,311

 – 

 (53,445)

 53,466

 599,899

 (535,757)

 64,142

 562,177

 (508,711)

 53,466

 6,314

 2,636,002

 115,004

 2,810,786

 – 

 – 

 (4,758)

 1,556

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 37,722

 – 

 (27,948)

 (59,752)

 2,636,002

 87,056

 2,788,756

 11,177

 – 

 147,319

 261,096

 – 

 – 

 (4,863)

 6,314

 2,636,002

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 2,640,313

 – 

 (32,315)

 (90,623)

 2,636,002

 115,004

 2,810,786

 25,438

 2,636,002

 276,426

 3,537,765

 (23,882)

 – 

 (189,370)

 (749,009)

 1,556

 2,636,002

 87,056

 2,788,756

 25,438

 2,636,002

 276,426

 3,500,043

 (19,124)

 – 

 (161,422)

 (689,257)

 6,314

 2,636,002

 115,004

 2,810,786

The carrying value of plant and equipment held under finance lease and hire purchase contracts as at 30 June 2016 is nil 
(2015: nil).

Plant and equipment at a value of $2,636,002 was acquired during last year as part of the acquisition of the Sinclair Nickel 
Project.

Page 58

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS12.  EXPLORATION, EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURE

Costs carried forward in respect of areas of interest in the following phases:

Exploration and evaluation phase – at cost

Balance at beginning of period

Expenditure capitalised

Acquisition of projects

30 Jun 16
$

Restated 
30 Jun 15
$

 14,000,000

 544,635

 – 

 – 

 – 

 14,000,000

 14,544,635

 14,000,000

The recoupment of costs carried forward in relation to areas of interest in the exploration and evaluation phases is 
dependent upon the successful development and commercial exploitation or sale of the respective areas.

13.  TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

Current

Trade payables

Accruals

Other payables

Trade payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30 day terms.

14.  EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

Current

Employee benefits

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

308,279

 5,871

 48,069

362,219

 73,056

 273,142

 34,688

 380,886

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 100,416

 72,500

Employee benefits relate to annual leave and long service leave entitlements accrued to employees.

Page 59

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS15.  PROVISIONS

Non-Current

Provision for mine closure

Balance at the beginning of the year

Acquisition of Project

Unwinding of discount rate adjustment

Balance at the end of year

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 8,287,209

 8,045,834

 8,045,834

–

 – 

 8,045,834

 241,375

 – 

 8,287,209

 8,045,834

Provision for mine closure is the estimated present value of the mine closure and rehabilitation costs of the Sinclair mine. 
The provision represents the best estimate of the present value of the expenditure required to settle the restoration 
obligations at the reporting date. Future restoration costs are reviewed annually and any changes in the estimate are 
reflected in the present value of the provision for mine closure at each reporting date.

16.  ISSUED CAPITAL

Ordinary shares

Issued and fully paid

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 60,881,617

 37,404,278

Movements in ordinary shares on issue

At 1 July

Share placement at 47c cents

Share placement at 45c cents

Share issue costs

At 30 June

30 Jun 16

30 Jun 15

Number

$

Number

$

 131,538,627

 37,404,278

 131,538,627

 37,404,278

 17,021,277

 8,000,000

 37,139,975

 16,712,989

 – 

1,235,650

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 185,699,879

 60,881,617

 131,538,627

 37,404,278

Fully paid ordinary shares carry one vote per share and carry the right to dividend.

30 Jun 16

30 Jun 15

Number

$

Number

$

Movements in options over ordinary shares 
on issue

At 1 July

Directors’ remuneration

Employees’ remuneration

Transfer on exercise of unlisted options

 7,250,000

448,632

 8,750,000

 1,746,400

 – 

 650,000

 – 

 116,221

 120,725

 3,000,000

 1,000,000

 193,982

50,250

 – 

 – 

 – 

Unlisted Options Lapsing

 (2,250,000)

 (290,189)

 (5,500,000)

 (1,542,000)

At 30 June

 5,650,000

395,389

 7,250,000

448,632

Share options are exercisable on a 1:1 basis at various exercise prices. The options expire between 30 September 2016 
to 31 March 2019. Further details of options granted to directors and employees are contained in Note 21 to the financial 
statements.

Page 60

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS17.  ACCUMULATED LOSSES

Accumulated Losses

Balance at beginning financial year

Net loss for the year

Transfer on expiry of unexercised options

Balance at end of financial year

Reserves

Asset revaluation reserve

Share based payment reserve

Balance at end of financial year

Asset revaluation reserve

30 Jun 16
$

Restated 
30 Jun 15
$

 (24,305,401)

 (22,077,919)

 (8,010,457)

 (3,769,482)

 290,189

 1,542,000

 (32,025,669)

 (24,305,401)

 14,200

 395,389

 409,589

 21,200

 448,632

 469,832

The asset revaluation reserve is used to record temporary fluctuations between the market value of available-for-sale 
investments and the acquisition price.

Share based payment reserve

The share based payment reserve is used to record the value of equity benefits provided to employees and Directors as 
part of their remuneration. Refer to Note 21 for further details.

18.  EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic loss per share

Basic loss per share

Net loss for the period

30 Jun 16
cents

Restated 
30 Jun 15
cents

 (5.06)

 (2.87)

$

$

 (8,010,457)

 (3,769,482)

Number

Number

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purpose of basic loss per share

 158,424,209

 131,538,627

Diluted loss per share

Diluted loss per share was not calculated for the years ended 30 June 2016 and 30 June 2015 as the Company was in a 
loss making situation which did not increase the loss per share.

Page 61

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS19.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In order to maintain current rights of tenure to exploration tenements, the Group is required to perform exploration work to 
meet the minimum expenditure requirements specified by various State governments. These obligations are not provided 
for in the financial report and are payable as follows:

Exploration expenditure

Within one year

After one year but not more than five years

Greater than five years

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 2,367,628

 2,374,865

 8,637,277

 9,080,766

 19,116,976

 21,088,976

 30,121,881

 32,544,607

If the Group decides to relinquish certain exploration leases and/or does not meet these obligations, assets recognised 
in the statement of financial position may require review to determine the appropriateness of carrying values. The sale, 
transfer or farm-out of exploration rights to third parties will reduce or extinguish these obligations.

Operating leases

Operating lease arrangements comprise an agreement for the rental of office space with a lease term of 2 years; storage 
facilities with a lease term of 1 year and a motor vehicle operating lease with a term of 2 years. Future minimum rentals 
payable under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 131,263

 23,269

 139,914

 23,269

 – 

 – 

 154,532

 163,183

Non-cancellable operating lease commitments

Within one year

After one year but not more than five years

Greater than five years

20.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(a)  Introduction
The Group has exposure to the following risks arising from financial instruments:

•  Credit risk
•  Liquidity risk
• 
•  Capital risk

Interest rate risk

This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks, their objectives, policies and 
processes for measuring and managing risk and the management of capital. Further quantitative disclosures are included 
throughout this note and the financial report.

The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the risk management framework. 
Risk management policies are established to identify and analyse risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk limits 
and controls and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly 
to reflect changes in market conditions and the Group‘s activities. The Group’s aim is to develop a disciplined and 
constructive control environment in which all employees understand their roles and obligations.

Page 62

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS20.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)
(b)	 Categories	of	financial	instruments

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Receivables

Available-for-sale investments

Financial liabilities

Trade and other payables

Other financial liabilities

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 20,243,616

 4,865,632

 317,674

 120,700

 260,811

 130,700

 20,681,990

 5,257,143

 362,218

 100,416

 462,634

 380,886

 72,500

 453,386

Fair value of financial assets and liabilities

The carrying amount of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded in the financial statements represents their 
respective net fair values, determined in accordance with the accounting policies disclosed in Note 2.

During the year, an assessment of the fair value of available-for-sale investments resulted in a loss of $7,000 (2015: loss of 
$156,300) recognised in the statement of comprehensive income in the line item “Net change in the fair value of available-
for-sale financial assets” and an impairment of $3,000 (2015: $426,000) in the statement of comprehensive income.

The Directors consider that the carrying amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded in the financial 
statements approximate their fair value.

(c)  Credit Risk Management
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the 
Group. The Group has adopted a policy of only dealing with creditworthy counterparties and obtaining sufficient collateral 
where appropriate, as a means of mitigating the risk of financial loss from defaults. The Group only transacts with entities 
that are rated the equivalent of investment grade and above. This information is supplied by independent rating agencies 
where available and, if not available, the Group uses publicly available financial information and its own trading record to 
rate its major customers. The Group’s exposure and the credit ratings of its counterparties are continuously monitored and 
the aggregate value of transactions concluded is spread amongst approved counterparties. Credit exposure is controlled 
by counterparty limits that are reviewed and approved by the Risk Management Committee annually.

The Group does not have any significant credit risk exposure to any single counterparty or any Group of counterparties 
having similar characteristics. The credit risk on liquid funds and derivative financial instruments is limited because the 
counterparties are banks with high credit ratings assigned by international credit rating agencies.

The carrying amount of financial assets recorded in the financial statements, net of any allowance for losses, represents the 
Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk without taking account of the value of any collateral obtained.

Page 63

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS20.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)
(d)  Liquidity Risk Management
Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the board of Directors, who have built an appropriate liquidity 
risk management framework for the management of the Group’s short, medium and long-term funding and liquidity 
management requirements. The Group manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate reserves, banking facilities and reserve 
borrowing facilities by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of financial 
assets and liabilities. The following table details the Company’s and the Group’s expected contractual maturity for its non-
derivative financial liabilities. These have been drawn up based on undiscounted contractual maturities of the financial liabilities 
based on the earliest date the Group can be required to repay. The tables include both interest and principal cash flows.

Less than  
1 month
$

1 to 3 
months
$

3 months  
to 1 year
$

1 to 5  
years
$

5+ years
$

No fixed 
term
$

Total
$

2016

Financial Assets

Non-interest bearing

 66,025

Variable interest rate  1,235,310

 – 

 – 

Fixed interest rate

 18,360,217

 585,706

 19,661,552

 585,706

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 163,550

 163,550

Financial Liabilities

Non-interest bearing

362,219

Fixed interest rate

 – 

 362,219

2015

Financial Assets

Non-interest bearing

 22,995

Variable interest rate

 348,204

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

Fixed interest rate

 1,001,907

 3,379,254

 1,373,106

 3,379,254

 100,416

 – 

 100,416

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 162,000

 162,000

Financial Liabilities

Non-interest bearing

 380,886

Fixed interest rate

 – 

 380,886

 – 

 – 

 – 

 72,500

 – 

 72,500

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 66,025

 1,235,310

 19,109,473

 20,410,808

462,635

 – 

462,635

 22,995

 348,204

 4,543,161

 4,914,360

 453,386

 – 

 453,386

(e)  Interest rate risk
The Group is not exposed to interest rate risk as it has not borrowed funds at fixed/variable interest rates.

Some of the Group’s assets are subject to interest rate risk but the Group is not dependent on this income.

Interest rate sensitivity analysis

The sensitivity analysis of the Group’s exposure to interest rate risk at the reporting date has been determined based on a 
change of 50 basis points in interest rates taking place at the beginning of the financial year and held constant throughout 
the year.

At reporting date, if interest rates had been 50 basis points higher and all other variables were constant, the Group’s net 
loss would have reduced by $6,177 (2014: net loss reduced by $1,741).

Page 64

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS20.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)
(f)  Capital risk management
The Board’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to 
sustain future development of the business. The capital structure of the Group consists of equity only, comprising issued 
capital and reserves, net of accumulated losses. The Group’s policy is to use capital market issues to meet the funding 
requirements of the Group.

There were no changes in the Group’s approach to capital management during the year.

The Group is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

(g)	 Fair	value	of	financial	instruments
AASB 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures which require disclosure of fair value measurements by level of the following fair 
value measurement hierarchy:

•  Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1);
• 

Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (as 
prices) or indirectly (derived from prices) (level 2); and
Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs) (level 3).

• 

The following table presents the Group’s assets and liabilities measured and recognised at fair value at 30 June 2016 and 
30 June 2015.

Level 1 
$

Level 2 
$

Level 3 
$

Total 
$

2016

Assets

Available-for-sale financial assets

 120,700

2015

Assets

Available-for-sale financial assets

 130,700

 – 

 – 

 – 

 120,700

 – 

 130,700

21.  SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
The Group has an Employee Share Option Plan (“ESOP”) for executives and employees of the Group. In accordance with 
the provisions of the ESOP, as approved by shareholders at a previous annual general meeting, executives and employees 
may be granted options at the discretion of the Directors.

Each employee share option converts into one ordinary share of Talisman Mining Limited on exercise. No amounts are paid 
or payable by the recipient on receipt of the option. The options carry neither rights to dividends nor voting rights. Options 
may be exercised at any time from the date of vesting to the date of their expiry.

The number of options granted is at the sole discretion of the Directors subject to the total number of outstanding options 
being issued under the ESOP not exceeding 5% of the Company’s issued capital at any one time.

Options issued to Directors are not issued under the ESOP but are subject to approval by shareholders and attach vesting 
conditions as appropriate.

There are no cash settlement alternatives.

Page 65

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS21.  SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (CONTINUED)
The following share-based payment arrangements were in place during the current and prior periods:

Options  
Series

Number

Grant date

Expiry date

Vesting date

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

 250,000

 250,000

 250,000

 250,000

 562,500

 562,500

 562,500

 562,500

 750,000

 750,000

 750,000

 750,000

 125,000

 125,000

 125,000

 125,000

 150,000

 175,000

 175,000

 150,000

 125,000

 125,000

 125,000

 125,000

15-Mar-12

15-Mar-12

15-Mar-12

15-Mar-12

31-Jul-15

31-Jul-15

31-Jul-15

31-Jul-15

13-Sep-12

15-Mar-13

13-Sep-13

15-Mar-14

25-Nov-13

31-Oct-16

26-May-14

25-Nov-13

31-Oct-16

25-Nov-14

25-Nov-13

31-Oct-16

26-May-15

25-Nov-13

31-Oct-16

25-Nov-15

5-Dec-14

5-Dec-14

5-Dec-14

5-Dec-14

4-Mar-15

4-Mar-15

4-Mar-15

4-Mar-15

5-Mar-15

5-Mar-15

5-Mar-15

31-Oct-17

25-May-15

31-Oct-17

24-Nov-15

31-Oct-17

24-May-16

31-Oct-17

24-Nov-16

1-Mar-18

1-Mar-18

1-Mar-18

1-Mar-18

1-Sep-15

1-Mar-16

1-Sep-16

1-Mar-17

30-Sep-16

11-Jul-15

30-Sep-16

12-Oct-15

30-Sep-16

12-Jun-16

11-Aug-15

30-Jun-17

31-Dec-15

4-Apr-16

4-Apr-16

4-Apr-16

4-Apr-16

31-Mar-19

30-Sep-16

31-Mar-19

31-Mar-17

31-Mar-19

30-Sep-17

31-Mar-19

31-Mar-18

Exercise  
price

Fair value per 
option at  
grant date

$

$1.02

$1.13

$1.41

$1.53

$0.43

$0.51

$0.60

$0.69

$0.41

$0.49

$0.56

$0.64

$0.40

$0.50

$0.60

$0.70

$0.40

$0.50

$0.60

$0.90

$0.80

$0.90

$0.95

$1.00

$

$0.18

$0.18

$0.16

$0.16

$0.04

$0.04

$0.04

$0.03

$0.11

$0.10

$0.10

$0.10

$0.11

$0.10

$0.10

$0.09

$0.07

$0.06

$0.06

$0.37

$0.02

$0.14

$0.13

$0.13

There has been no alteration of the terms and conditions of the above share-based payment arrangement since grant date.

Page 66

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS21.  SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (CONTINUED)
The following table illustrates the number (No.) and weighted average exercise prices of and movements in share options 
issued during the year:

Outstanding at the beginning of year

Granted during the year

Exercised during the year

Expired during the year

Outstanding at the end of year

Exercisable at the end of year

2016

2015

Number of 
options

Weighted 
average 
exercise price

Number of 
options

Weighted 
average 
exercise price

$

$

7,250,000

650,000

–

(2,250,000)

5,650,000

4,775,000

0.64

0.91

0.90

0.57

0.52

8,750,000

4,000,000

–

(5,500,000)

7,250,000

3,437,500

0.84

0.53

–

0.87

0.64

0.71

No share options were exercised during the period.

The share options outstanding at the end of the year had an exercise price of $0.57 (2015: $0.64) and a weighted average 
remaining contractual life of 361 days (2015: 610 days). The range of exercise price of option outstanding range from $0.40 
to $1.00 (2015:$ 0.40 to $1.53)

The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year was $123,987 (2015: $383,969)

The fair value of the equity-settled share options granted under the option plans is estimated as at the date of grant using 
the Black Scholes model taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were granted.

Inputs into model

20

21

22

23

24

Exercise price

 $ 0.90

 $ 0.80

 $ 0.90

 $ 0.95

 $ 1.00

Grant date share price (5 day 
VWAP)

Expected volatility

Risk-free interest rate

Dividend yield (%)

Expected life of options (years)

 $ 0.590

 $ 0.465

 $ 0.465

 $ 0.465

 $ 0.465

150%

1.95%

Nil

 1.64

68%

1.95%

Nil

 3.30

68%

1.95%

Nil

 3.30

68%

1.95%

Nil

 3.30

68%

1.95%

Nil

 3.30

The fair value of the equity-settled share options granted under the option plans is estimated as at the date of grant using 
the Black Scholes model taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were granted.

The expected life of the options is based on historical data and is not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may 
occur. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility is indicative of future trends, which may 
also not necessarily be the actual outcome. No other features of options granted were incorporated into the measurement 
of fair value.

The carrying amount of the liability relating to the cash-settled share-based payment at 30 June 2016 is $395,388  
(2015: $448,631).

Page 67

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS22.  DIRECTORS’ AND EXECUTIVES’ DISCLOSURES
Details of key management personnel

The key management personnel of Talisman Mining Limited during the year were:

Directors

Jeremy Kirkwood 
Alan Senior 
Brian Dawes 
Karen Gadsby 
Gary Lethridge 

Executives

Daniel Madden 
Shaun Vokes 
Anthony Greenaway 
Ben Wilson 

Non-Executive Chairman 
Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director
Managing Director 

(Appointed 1 April 2016)

(Resigned 31 March 2016)

Chief Financial Officer to Acting Chief Executive Officer 
Commercial Manager/ Company Secretary  
General Manager – Geology 
General Manager – Project Development

(Appointed 1 April 2016)
(Appointed 29 February 2016)
(Appointed 15 March 2016)

Key management personnel compensation is disclosed in the Remuneration Report which forms part of the Directors’ 
Report and has been audited.

The total remuneration paid to key management personnel of the Company and the Group during the year was as follows:

Short-term employee benefits

Post-employment benefits

Other long-term benefits

Share-based payments (i)

Total key management personnel compensation

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

1,022,155

1,105,508

99,398

41,792

83,447

104,892

–

225,501

1,246,792

1,435,901

(i)  The value of share-based payments shown in the table are non-cash values based on an accounting valuation 

calculated under the Black Scholes option pricing method.

Other transactions with key management personnel

During the year ended 30 June 2016 the Group paid $13,628 to Ailie Services Pty Ltd, a related party of Mr. Brian 
Dawes, for consultancy services provided over a 9 day period which were deemed to be provided outside the ordinary 
requirements of Non-Executive Director duties. This transaction was made on normal terms and conditions.

The Group also paid $2,325 to Natalie Madden, a related party of Mr. Daniel Madden, for consultancy services provided 
over a month. This transaction was made on normal terms and conditions.

There were no other transactions with key management personnel of the Group during the 2016 financial year.

Page 68

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS23.  JOINT OPERATION
In December 2013, the Company entered into a $15 million exploration Farm-In and Joint Venture Agreement (“Agreement”) 
with Sandfire Resources NL (ASX: SFR, “Sandfire”) over its Doolgunna Cu-Au Projects located approximately 150km 
north-east of Meekatharra in the northern Murchinson Goldfields region of Western Australia. These projects comprise the 
Springfield, Halloween and Halloween West Projects which abut Sandfire’s DeGrussa-Doolgunna tenements. During the year 
Sandfire reached the $15 million farm-in expenditure threshold (project-to-date), which marked the end of its sole-funding 
stage and the formation of an unincorporated joint venture with Sandfire acting as Joint Venture Manager. Joint venture 
expenditure is now funded jointly by the Group and Sandfire on a 30:70 basis in accordance with the Agreement.

As a result of the above Agreement, the Group’s interest in the Halloween West Joint Venture was reduced to 18.8% (2015: 
62.9%). The Halloween West Joint Venture was originally formed in 2012 when the Company reached agreement with 
Chrysalis Resources Ltd (“Chrysalis”) to farm into the Halloween West Copper-Gold Project. In October 2014 Sandfire 
acquired the interest held by Chrysalis and agreed with the Company to farm-into the Halloween West Project under the 
terms of the Doolgunna Cu-Au Projects Agreement. Sandfire acts as the Joint Venture Manager of the Halloween West 
Joint Venture.

The Group is entitled to a proportionate share of the income received and bears a proportionate share of the joint 
operation’s expenses.

The joint operation accounts, which are proportionately consolidated based on the above equity percentages in the 
consolidated financial statements, are disclosed as follows:

Joint Operation

Operator

Doolgunna

Sandfire Resources

Halloween West

Sandfire Resources

Jun 2016

Jun 2015

Benefical 
Interest

Benefical 
Interest

30%

19%

100%

63%

The Group’s interests in the assets/liabilities and income/expenditure employed in the above joint venture operations are 
detailed below. The amounts are included in the financial statements under their respective asset categories.

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Receivables

Exploration and Evaluation

Total assets

Liabilities

Trade and other payables

Total liabilities

Net assets

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 414,740

 19,535

 544,634

 978,909

 31,826

 502

 588,940

 621,268

 234,411

 234,411

 39,438

 39,438

 744,498

 581,830

Carrying amount of interest in joint venture

 744,498

 581,830

Page 69

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS23.  JOINT OPERATION (CONTINUED)
The joint venture has no contingent liabilities and capital commitments with the exception that in order to maintain current 
rights of tenure to exploration tenements, the joint venture is required to perform exploration work to meet the minimum 
expenditure requirements specified by various State governments. These obligations are not provided for in the financial 
report and are payable as follows:

Commitments for expenditure

Exploration expenditure

Within one year

After one year but not more than five years

Greater than five years

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 70,000

 112,767

 50,000

 130,548

 – 

 – 

 182,767

 180,548

24.  SEGMENT REPORTING
The Group continues to operate in one geographical segment, being Western Australia and in one operating category, 
being mineral exploration and evaluation.

The chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the Board of Talisman Mining Limited and information reported 
to the Board for the purpose of resource allocation and assessment of performance is focused on mineral exploration and 
evaluation within Western Australia. Consequently the Group reports within one segment.

25.  CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND CONTINGENT ASSETS
A contingent liability exists for a deferred consideration payment of $2 million for the Sinclair Nickel Project, to be paid six 
months following the receipt of the first payment for the sale of nickel product should production recommence within six 
years of transaction completion. This contingent consideration is dependent on a number of factors that are unknown at 
the date of this financial report which include amongst others, material future exploration success and future nickel prices.

In the opinion of the Directors there are no other contingent liabilities or assets as at 30 June 2016 and no contingent 
liabilities or assets were incurred in the interval between the period end and the date of this financial report.

Page 70

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS26.  PARENT ENTITY DISCLOSURES
Disclosures as at 30 June 2016 and for the year then ended in relation to Talisman Mining Limited as a single entity are 
noted below.

Assets

Current assets

Non-current assets

Total assets

Liabilities

Current liabilities

Non-current liabilities

Total liabilities

Net assets

Equity

Issued capital

Reserves

Asset revaluation reserve

Share based payment reserve

Retained earnings

Total equity

Loss for the year

Net change in the fair value of available for sale financial assets

Total comprehensive loss

Exploration expenditure

Within one year

After one year but not more than five years

Greater than five years

30 Jun 16
$

Restated 
30 Jun 15
$

20,066,820

5,034,421

331,037

356,667

20,397,857

5,391,088

228,225

189,658

–

–

228,225

189,658

20,169,632

5,201,430

60,881,617

37,404,278

14,200

395,388

21,200

448,631

(41,121,573)

(32,663,679)

20,169,632

5,210,430

Year ended

30 Jun 16
$

Restated 
30 Jun 15
$

(8,748,083)

(2,421,342)

(7,000)

(156,300)

(8,755,083)

(2,577,642)

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

184,000

460,071

–

644,071

–

–

–

–

Page 71

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS27.  RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURE
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Talisman Mining Limited and the subsidiaries 
listed in the following table:

Name

Country of 
Incorporation

Equity Interest

Investment

2016
%

2015
%

2016
$

2015
$

Talisman A Pty Ltd

Talisman Nickel Pty Ltd

Haverford Holdings Pty Ltd

Australia

Australia

Australia

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 10

 1

 10

 1

 68,000

 68,000

Talisman Mining Limited is the ultimate parent entity and ultimate parent of the Group.

28.  ACQUISITION OF ASSETS
On 18 October 2014 Talisman Nickel Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Talisman Mining Limited, entered into an 
agreement with Xstrata Nickel Australasia Operations Pty Ltd. (XNAO), a subsidiary of Glencore plc to acquire 100% of the 
wholly owned Sinclair Nickel Project from XNAO.

On acquisition at 5 February 2015 Talisman Nickel Pty Ltd assumed all environmental liabilities and obligations, and made 
the following payments for the acquisition;
•  a cash payment of $7,950,000;
•  $130,996 of transaction costs;
•  $509,173 relating to stamp duty; and
•  a contingent deferred payment of $2 million dependent on production being recommenced within six years of 

transaction completion.1

The fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the Sinclair Project Nickel Project as at the date of acquisition are:

$

Deferred exploration and evaluation expenditure (Note 12)

Property, plant and equipment (Note 11)

Provision for mine closure (Note 15)

Fair value of identifiable net assets

Cost of the acquisition

Cash payment

Transaction costs

Stamp duty

Total cost of the acquisition

Cash payments associated with acquisition

Payments for exploration projects

Payments for property, plant and equipment

Recognised  
on acquisition

 14,000,000

 2,636,002

 (8,045,834)

 8,590,168

 7,950,000

 130,996

 509,172

 8,590,168

 5,954,166

 2,636,002

 8,590,168

1The contingent consideration is dependent on a number of factors that were unknown at the time of acquisition and 
remain unknown at this time, which include amongst others, material future exploration success and future nickel prices.

Accordingly given the inherent uncertainty of the contingent payment being realised it does not form part of the recognised 
purchase consideration for valuation purposes.

Page 72

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS29.  REMUNERATION OF AUDITORS
The auditor of Talisman Mining Limited is HLB Mann Judd.

Agreed upon procedures and reporting thereon in relation to Sandfire Resource NL 
farm in spend on Springfield JV.

Audit or review of the financial report

Total Remuneration of Auditors

30.  EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO REPORTING DATE
The following management changes were effective 1 July 2016:
•  Mr Daniel Madden was appointed as Managing Director
•  Mr Shaun Vokes was appointed as Chief Financial Officer

30 Jun 16
$

30 Jun 15
$

 15,500

 34,500

 50,000

–

 34,500

 34,500

There has not been any other matter or circumstance occurring subsequent to end of the financial year that has 
significantly affected, or may significantly affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of 
affairs of the Group in future financial years.

Page 73

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ■ ADDITIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGE INFORMATION
AS AT 21 SEPTEMBER 2016

1.  NUMBER OF HOLDERS OF EQUITY SECURITIES

(a)  Distribution of holders of equity securities

Range

1 to 1,000

1,001 to 5,000

5,001 to 10,000

10,001 to 100,000

100,001 and over

Fully paid 
ordinary 
shares

 165

 605

 462

 894

 215

Number of 
holders

 88,671

 1,877,913

 4,029,477

 33,303,222

 146,400,596

 2,341

 185,699,879

(b)  Voting rights
Each ordinary share is entitled to one vote when a poll is called, otherwise each member present at a meeting or by proxy 
has one vote on a show of hands.

(c)  Less than marketable parcel of shares
The number of shareholders holding less than a marketable parcel is 224 (holding a total of 158,006 shares) given a share 
value of $0.365 cents per share.

(d)  Substantial Shareholdings:

Ordinary Shareholders

Mr Kerry Kyriakos Harmanis

Hunter Hall Investment Mgt

Fully paid ordinary shares

Number

%

 29,689,138

 19,779,949

15.99%

10.65%

Set out above is an extract from the Company’s register of last substantial shareholder notices as received by the 
Company and/or lodged at the ASX. Shareholdings and percentages reported in the table are as reported in the most 
recent notifications received, however these may differ from current holdings as substantial holders are required to notify 
the Company only in respect of changes which act to increase or decrease their percentage holding by at least 1% of total 
voting rights.

2.  COMPANY SECRETARY
The name of the company secretaries are Shaun Vokes and Alexander Neuling.

3.  REGISTERED OFFICE AND PRINCIPAL ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
Registered and principal administrative office:
Ground Level, 6 Centro Avenue
Subiaco Western Australia 6008
Telephone +61 8 9380 4230

Registered securities are held at the following address:
Link Market Services Limited
Level 4, Central Park
152 St Georges Terrace
Perth Western Australia 6000

Page 74

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ ADDITIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGE INFORMATION
AS AT 21 SEPTEMBER 2016

4.  SECURITIES EXCHANGE LISTING
Quotation has been granted for all the ordinary shares of the Company on all Member Exchanges of the Australian 
Securities Exchange Limited

5.  RESTRICTED SECURITIES
There are no restricted securities or securities in voluntary escrow at the date of this report.

6.  TWENTY LARGEST HOLDERS OF ORDINARY SHARES

Ordinary Shareholders

1 Mr Kerry K Harmanis & Ms Pauline Hind

2 Hunter Hall Investment Mgt

3 Grosvenor Pirie Mgt

4 Westoz Funds Mgt

5 Mr & Mrs Phillip W Averill

6 Acorn Capital

7 Private Portfolio Managers PPM

8 3rd Wave Investors

9 Ms. Lorna J Kelly

10 Mr & Mrs Anthony Beris

11 Mr Angus D Paradice & Ms Claire V Pfister

12 Mr Nicholas TJ Paspaley

13 Mrs Jasmine Kallis

14 Mr Iain S Gray

15 Independent Asset Mgt

16 Katana Capital

17 Interactive Brokers

18 Mr Lafras Luitingh

19 Mr Hubert A East

20 Mr Christopher M Michael

7.  ON-MARKET BUY BACK
At the date of this report the Company is not involved in an on-market buy-back.

Number

%

 29,689,138

 19,779,949

15.99%

10.65%

 4,112,795

 4,000,000

 3,972,151

 3,939,911

 3,806,641

 3,410,892

 2,500,000

 2,404,464

 2,125,000

 1,754,064

 1,520,000

 1,500,000

 1,444,445

 1,290,000

 1,198,765

 1,000,000

 975,000

 920,000

2.21%

2.15%

2.14%

2.12%

2.05%

1.84%

1.35%

1.29%

1.14%

0.94%

0.82%

0.81%

0.78%

0.69%

0.65%

0.54%

0.53%

0.50%

 91,343,215

49.19%

Page 75

TALISMAN MINING LTD ■ NOTES

Page 76

TALISMAN MINING LTDGround Floor
6 Centro Avenue, Subiaco
Western Australia 6008

T: + 61 8 9380 4230
F: + 61 8 9382 8200
www.talismanmining.com.au