Telephone & Data Systems Inc.
Annual Report 2018

Plain-text annual report

2018 Annual Report www.tdsinc.com 1485_TDS_Cover.indd13/21/193:05PMWith 50 successful years in business, we continue to focus on providing outstanding communications services to our customers. We are investing in the TDS Family of Businesses to bring our customers high-quality wireless and broadband technology that position the company for long-term sustainability and growth. U.S. Cellular During 2018, U.S. Cellular implemented our customer-centric strategy, which led to expansion of our postpaid handset customer base while also increasing revenues and profitability. We tightly managed costs throughout the organization, while investing in our network to continue providing an exceptional experience for our customers.We will build on this momentum to execute on our key objectives for 2019. First, we will continue to strengthen and grow our loyal wireless customer base by creating more personalized and simplified experiences through digital enhancements to our retail environment, including easy switching processes for new customers. U.S. Cellular will capture new and emerging revenue opportunities by optimizing our device portfolio to ensure access to emerging categories like wearables and connected home devices. We plan to increase revenues by acquiring new customers through investing in expansion of some of our markets. We will improve our network to meet evolving needs by making continuous investments in network technologies like 5G and VoLTE. U.S. Cellular is working to expand margins through broad-ranging cost management initiatives. We are exercising expense discipline in seeking every opportunity to improve effectiveness and efficiency, and we are managing the costs of our network investments.TDS Telecom TDS Telecom made significant progress on our strategic priorities in 2018, expanding its fiber footprint in wireline and generating strong increases in cable broadband connections. TDS Telecom’s wireline strategic imperatives for 2019 are to continue to grow our fiber footprint both in and outside of our current markets and to execute on broadband buildout obligations under the Alternative Connect America Cost Model.We are focused on fiber expansion, growing our fiber footprint in and out of our current ILEC territory. In cable, we have achieved steady growth in broadband connections with eleven consecutive quarters of strong broadband connection growth. We continue to evaluate potential cable acquisitions in markets that have attractive demographics and little to no fiber competition. In addition to fiber expansion, TDS Telecom plans to launch new offerings such as TDS TV+, a next generation TV platform, to improve the customer experience. OneNeck IT Solutions At our hosted and managed IT services business, OneNeck IT Solutions, our strategic goals are to grow recurring service revenues and to further customize and standardize our processes across our portfolio of offerings. Creating long-term shareholder value At TDS, we maintain a financially sound foundation so that all our businesses can take advantage of growth opportunities to enhance their competitive positions. We continue to return value to our shareholders primarily through our cash dividends, which have increased every year for the past 45 years. Video message To view the video that accompanies this annual report please visit investors.tdsinc.comThank you We are grateful to the associates and employees of the TDS Family of Businesses, for their dedication and innovation in providing outstanding experiences for our customers. Thank you to our shareholders and debtholders for your continuing support of our long-term plans and strategies. Very truly yours,DEAR SHAREHOLDERS,LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. Walter C. D. CarlsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer Chairman of the Board1485_TDS_Cover.indd 23/21/19 2:39 PMTELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 Pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-3 The following audited financial statements and certain other financial information for the year ended December 31, 2018, represent Telephone and Data Systems’ annual report to shareholders as required by the rules and regulations of the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). The following information was filed with the SEC on February 22, 2019, as Exhibit 13 to Telephone and Data Systems’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Such information has not been updated or revised since the date it was originally filed with the SEC. Accordingly, you are encouraged to review such information together with any subsequent information that we have filed with the SEC and other publicly available information. Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. Financial Reports Contents Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Executive Overview Terms used by TDS Results of Operations – TDS Consolidated U.S. Cellular Operations TDS Telecom Operations Wireline Operations Cable Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources Contractual and Other Obligations Consolidated Cash Flow Analysis Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis Applications of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Other Items Regulatory Matters Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement Market Risk Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures Financial Statements Consolidated Statement of Operations Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Consolidated Balance Sheet – Assets Consolidated Balance Sheet – Liabilities and Equity Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Reports of Management Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Selected Consolidated Financial Data Consolidated Quarterly Information (Unaudited) Shareholder Information Exhibit 13 Page No. 1 1 4 6 9 16 20 23 26 32 33 34 34 37 37 40 43 45 50 50 51 52 53 54 55 58 100 102 104 105 106 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 11MAR201618343100 EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (TDS) for the year ended December 31, 2018, and with the description of TDS’ business included herein. Certain numbers included herein are rounded to millions for ease of presentation; however, certain calculated amounts and percentages are determined using the unrounded numbers. This report contains statements that are not based on historical facts, including the words ‘‘believes,’’ ‘‘anticipates,’’ ‘‘estimates,’’ ‘‘expects,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘intends,’’ ‘‘projects’’ and similar expressions. These statements constitute and represent ‘‘forward looking statements’’ as this term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be significantly different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. See Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement for additional information. TDS uses certain ‘‘non-GAAP financial measures’’ and each such measure is identified in the MD&A. A discussion of the reason TDS determines these metrics to be useful and a reconciliation of these measures to their most directly comparable measures determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) are included in the Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures section within the MD&A of this Form 10-K Report. General 2018 Operating Revenues by Segment TDS is a diversified telecommunications company that pro- vides high-quality communications services to approxi- mately 6 million connections nationwide. TDS provides wireless services through its 82%-owned subsidiary, United States Cellular Corporation (U.S. Cellular). TDS also pro- vides wireline and cable services, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, TDS Telecommunications LLC (TDS Telecom). TDS’ segments operate almost entirely in the United States. See Note 18 – Business Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for addi- tional information about TDS’ segments. TDS re-evaluated internal reporting roles with regard to its hosted and managed services (HMS) business unit and, as a result, changed its reportable segments. Effective January 1, 2018, HMS was considered a non-reportable segment and is no longer being reported under TDS Telecom. Prior periods have been recast to conform to this revised presentation. 4% 4% 14% 78% Wireless Wireline Cable Other 28FEB201903034001 1 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS TDS Mission and Strategy TDS’ mission is to provide outstanding communications services to its customers and meet the needs of its shareholders, its people, and its communities. In pursuing this mission, TDS seeks to grow its businesses, create opportunities for its associates and employees, and build value over the long-term for its shareholders. Across all of its businesses, TDS is focused on providing exceptional customer experiences through best-in-class services and products and superior customer service. TDS’ long-term strategy calls for the majority of its capital to be reinvested in its operating businesses to strengthen their competitive positions and financial performance, while also returning value to TDS shareholders through the payment of a regular quarterly cash dividend and share repurchases. Throughout 2018, TDS continued to focus on investing in the networks that are the backbone of its commitment to provide outstanding communications services to its customers. TDS believes these investments strengthen its competitive position and improve operating performance. Looking ahead to 2019, TDS will continue to execute on its strategies to build strong, competitive businesses providing high-quality, data-focused services and products. Invest in the business to improve returns and pursue initiatives that align with long-term strategies Consistent with its strategy, TDS made significant investments in 2018 to improve the performance of its networks. U.S. Cellular added capacity to its 4G LTE network responding to customers’ growing use of data. U.S. Cellular enhanced its service and product offerings by commercially deploying VoLTE technology in California, Iowa, Oregon, Washington and Wisconsin and deployments in several additional operating markets will occur in 2019. VoLTE technology allows customers to utilize a 4G LTE network for both voice and data services, and offers enhanced services such as high definition voice and simultaneous voice and data sessions. In addition, the deployment of VoLTE technology expands U.S. Cellular’s ability to offer roaming services to other wireless carriers. U.S. Cellular continues to engage in efforts related to the development of 5G standards and identifying potential use cases for 5G technology. When deployed commercially, 5G technology is expected to help address customers’ growing demand for data services and create opportunities for new services requiring high speed and reliability as well as low latency. In the fourth quarter of 2018, U.S. Cellular began conducting a trial utilizing 5G standards and equipment on its core LTE network. TDS Telecom’s Wireline business continues to focus on driving growth in its broadband and video services by investing in fiber inside existing markets and in new out-of-territory markets. With support from the FCC’s A-CAM program, Wireline will deploy higher speed broadband services to more rural areas. TDS Telecom’s Cable business continues to increase its broadband penetration by making network capacity investments and by offering more advanced services in its markets. TDS Telecom’s Wireline and Cable businesses also are investing in a next generation video platform called TDS TV+ to enhance video services. Return value to shareholders During 2018, TDS paid $72 million in regular quarterly cash dividends. TDS increased the dividend per share paid to its investors by 3% in 2018 which marks the 44th consecutive year of dividend increases and in February 2019, TDS increased its quarterly dividend per share from $0.16 to $0.165. There were no TDS or U.S. Cellular share repurchases in 2018. As of December 31, 2018, $199 million was available for share repurchase under the announced TDS stock repurchase program. There is no assurance that TDS will continue to increase the dividend rate or pay dividends and no assurance that TDS or U.S. Cellular will make any significant amount of share repurchases in the future. 2 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Annual Dividends Per TDS Share $0.70 $0.60 $0.50 $0.40 $0.30 $0.20 $0.10 7 9 9 1 8 9 9 1 9 9 9 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 4 0 0 2 5 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 7 0 0 2 8 0 0 2 9 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 3 1 0 2 4 1 0 2 1MAR201900163676 6 1 0 2 7 1 0 2 8 1 0 2 5 1 0 2 Significant Financial and Operating Matters The following is a summary of certain selected information contained in the comprehensive MD&A that follows. The overview does not contain all of the information that may be important. You should carefully read the entire MD&A and not rely solely on the highlights. (cid:2) Net income available to TDS common shareholders was $135 million in 2018, compared to $153 million in 2017. Diluted earnings per share was $1.17 in 2018 compared to $1.37 a year ago. (cid:2) Total additions to Property, plant and equipment were $767 million including expenditures to enhance and maintain TDS’ wireless network coverage, invest in information technology to support existing and new services and products, maintain and enhance existing infrastructure including build-out requirements to meet state broadband and A-CAM programs, build a TDS TV+ platform, and expand fiber deployment. 3 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS TERMS USED BY TDS The following is a list of definitions of certain industry terms that are used throughout this document: (cid:2) 4G LTE – fourth generation Long-Term Evolution, which is a wireless technology that enables more network capacity for more data per user as well as faster access to data compared to third generation (3G) technology. (cid:2) 5G – fifth generation wireless technology that is expected to help address customers’ growing demand for data services as well as create opportunities for new services requiring high speed and reliability as well as low latency. (cid:2) Account – represents an individual or business financially responsible for one or multiple associated connections. An account may include a variety of types of connections such as handsets and connected devices. (cid:2) Alternative Connect America Cost Model (A-CAM) – a USF support mechanism for rate-of-return carriers, which provides revenue support annually for ten years beginning in 2017. This support comes with an obligation to build defined broadband speeds to a certain number of locations. (cid:2) ASU 2014-09 – the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, including any subsequent modifications to such guidance. This ASU replaces existing revenue recognition rules with a single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. (cid:2) Auctions 101 and 102 – Auction 101 is an FCC auction of 28 GHz spectrum licenses that started in November 2018 and concluded in January 2019. Auction 102 is an FCC auction of 24 GHz spectrum licenses that is expected to start in early 2019. The spectrum auctioned in each of these auctions, referred to as Millimeter Wave spectrum, is expected to be used primarily to deliver 5G technology. (cid:2) Auctions 1000, 1001, and 1002 – Auction 1000 is an FCC auction of 600 MHz spectrum licenses that started in 2016 and concluded in 2017 involving: (1) a ‘‘reverse auction’’ in which broadcast television licensees submitted bids to voluntarily relinquish spectrum usage rights in exchange for payments (referred to as Auction 1001); (2) a ‘‘repacking’’ of the broadcast television bands in order to free up certain broadcast spectrum for other uses; and (3) a ‘‘forward auction’’ of licenses for spectrum cleared through this process to be used for wireless communications (referred to as Auction 1002). (cid:2) Broadband Connections – refers to the number of Wireline customers provided high-capacity data circuits via various technologies, including DSL and dedicated internet circuit technologies or the Cable billable number of lines into a building for high-speed data services. (cid:2) Churn Rate – represents the percentage of the connections that disconnect service each month. These rates represent the average monthly churn rate for each respective period. (cid:2) Connected Devices – non-handset devices that connect directly to the U.S. Cellular network. Connected devices include products such as tablets, wearables, modems, and hotspots. (cid:2) DOCSIS – Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification is an international telecommunications standard that permits the addition of high-bandwidth data transfer to an existing cable TV (CATV) system. DOCSIS 3.1 is a system specification that increases data transmission rates. (cid:2) EBITDA – refers to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and accretion and is used in the non-GAAP metric Adjusted EBITDA throughout this document. See Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for additional information. (cid:2) Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) – designation by states for providing specified services in ‘‘high cost’’ areas which enables participation in universal service support mechanisms. (cid:2) Free Cash Flow – non-GAAP metric defined as Cash flows from operating activities less Cash paid for additions to property, plant and equipment. See Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for additional information. (cid:2) Gross Additions – represents the total number of new connections added during the period, without regard to connections that were terminated during that period. 4 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cid:2) IPTV Connections – represents the number of Wireline customers provided video services using IP networking technology. (cid:2) ManagedIP Connections – refers to the number of telephone handsets, data lines and IP trunks providing communications using IP networking technology. (cid:2) Net Additions – represents the total number of new connections added during the period, net of connections that were terminated during that period. (cid:2) OIBDA – refers to operating income before depreciation, amortization and accretion and is used in the non-GAAP metric Adjusted OIBDA throughout this document. See Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for additional information. (cid:2) Partial Economic Areas – service areas of certain FCC licenses based on geography. (cid:2) Postpaid Average Billings per Account (Postpaid ABPA) – non-GAAP metric which is calculated by dividing total postpaid service revenues plus equipment installment plan billings by the average number of postpaid accounts and by the number of months in the period. See Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for additional information. (cid:2) Postpaid Average Billings per User (Postpaid ABPU) – non-GAAP metric which is calculated by dividing total postpaid service revenues plus equipment installment plan billings by the average number of postpaid connections and by the number of months in the period. See Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for additional information. (cid:2) Postpaid Average Revenue per Account (Postpaid ARPA) – metric which is calculated by dividing total postpaid service revenues by the average number of postpaid accounts and by the number of months in the period. (cid:2) Postpaid Average Revenue per User (Postpaid ARPU) – metric which is calculated by dividing total postpaid service revenues by the average number of postpaid connections and by the number of months in the period. (cid:2) Retail Connections – the sum of U.S. Cellular postpaid connections and U.S. Cellular prepaid connections. (cid:2) Tax Act – refers to comprehensive federal tax legislation enacted on December 22, 2017, which made broad changes to the U.S. tax code. Now titled H.R.1, the Tax Act was originally identified as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. (cid:2) Universal Service Fund (USF) – a system of telecommunications collected fees and support payments managed by the FCC intended to promote universal access to telecommunications services in the United States. (cid:2) U.S. Cellular Connections – individual lines of service associated with each device activated by a customer. Connections include all types of devices that connect directly to the U.S. Cellular network. (cid:2) Video Connections – generally, a home or business receiving video programming counts as one video connection. In counting bulk residential or commercial connections, such as an apartment building or a hotel, connections are counted based on the number of units/rooms within the building receiving service. (cid:2) Voice Connections – refers to the individual circuits connecting a customer to Wireline’s central office facilities or the Cable billable number of lines into a building for voice services. (cid:2) VoLTE – Voice over Long-Term Evolution is a technology specification that defines the standards and procedures for delivering voice communications and related services over 4G LTE networks. (cid:2) Wireline Residential Revenue per Connection – is calculated by dividing total Wireline residential revenue by the average number of Wireline residential connections and by the number of months in the period. 5 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — TDS CONSOLIDATED Year Ended December 31, (Dollars in millions) Operating revenues U.S. Cellular . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TDS Telecom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All other2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating expenses U.S. Cellular . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TDS Telecom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All other2 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) U.S. Cellular . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TDS Telecom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All other2 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment and other income (expense) Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total investment and other income (expense) . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to TDS shareholders . . . . . . . . Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP)4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/M — Percentage change not meaningful $ $ $ $ 20181 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016 3,967 927 215 5,109 3,809 834 261 4,904 158 93 (46) 205 160 26 (172) 2 16 221 46 175 40 135 1,079 1,267 767 $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,890 919 235 5,044 4,194 803 155 5,152 (304) 116 80 (108) 137 15 (170) 4 (14) (122) (279) 157 4 153 996 1,152 694 $ $ $ $ 3,990 882 283 5,155 3,942 803 302 5,047 48 79 (19) 108 140 11 (170) 3 (16) 92 40 52 9 43 964 1,118 630 2% 1% (9)% 1% (9)% 4% 68% (5)% N/M (20)% N/M N/M 17% 67% (1)% (22)% N/M N/M N/M 11% N/M (12)% 8% 10% 11% (3)% 4% (17)% (2)% 6% — (49)% 2% N/M 47% N/M N/M (2)% 42% — 30% 17% N/M N/M N/M (55)% N/M 3% 3% 10% 1 As of January 1, 2018, TDS adopted ASU 2014-09 using a modified retrospective approach. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. 2 Consists of corporate and other operations and intercompany eliminations. 3 During the third quarter of 2017, U.S. Cellular recorded a goodwill impairment of $370 million while TDS recorded a goodwill impairment of the U.S. Cellular reporting unit of $227 million. Prior to 2009, TDS accounted for U.S. Cellular’s share repurchases as step acquisitions, allocating a portion of the share repurchase value to TDS’ Goodwill. Further, goodwill of the U.S. Cellular reporting unit was impaired at the TDS level in 2003 but not at U.S. Cellular. Consequently, U.S. Cellular’s goodwill on a stand-alone basis and any resulting impairments of goodwill does not equal the TDS consolidated goodwill related to U.S. Cellular. The TDS adjustment of $143 million is included in ‘‘All other’’. During the third quarter of 2017, TDS also recorded a goodwill impairment of $35 million related to its HMS operations, included in ‘‘All other’’. For further information on the goodwill impairment see Note 7 — Intangible Assets in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 4 Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. Refer to individual segment discussions in this MD&A for additional details on operating revenues and expenses at the segment level. 6 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities represents TDS’ share of net income from entities in which it has a noncontrolling interest and that are accounted for using the equity method. TDS’ investment in the Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership (LA Partnership) contributed $77 million, $66 million and $71 million to Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Income tax expense (benefit) The effective tax rate on Income (loss) before income taxes for 2018 was 21.0%. The effective tax rate is lower than a normalized rate inclusive of federal and state tax, due primarily to an income tax accounting method change that accelerated depreciation on certain assets for the 2017 tax year, resulting in a discrete tax benefit recorded in the third quarter of 2018. TDS’ effective tax rate on Income (loss) before income taxes for 2017 was not meaningful due to the effect of the Tax Act combined with the tax impact of the impairment of goodwill in the U.S. Cellular and HMS reporting units, since portions of the goodwill balance are not amortizable for income tax purposes. The effective tax rate for 2016 was 43.2% and was consistent with a normalized tax rate inclusive of federal and state tax — note that the federal statutory rate prior to the Tax Act was 35%. See Note 5 — Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (Dollars in millions) U.S. Cellular noncontrolling public shareholders’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncontrolling shareholders’ or partners’ Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 26 14 40 $ $ 2 2 4 $ $ 8 1 9 Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax includes the noncontrolling public shareholders’ share of U.S. Cellular’s net income, the noncontrolling shareholders’ or partners’ share of certain U.S. Cellular subsidiaries’ net income and other TDS noncontrolling interests. 7 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Earnings (Dollars in millions) $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 $1,118 $1,152 $1,267 Net Income Adjusted EBITDA* $157 $175 $52 2016 2017 2018 1MAR201900164039 2018-2017 Commentary Net income and Adjusted EBITDA increased from 2017 to 2018 due primarily to improved operating results at U.S. Cellular and an increase in income from equity investments. Net income also increased due to the recognition of a loss on impairment of goodwill related to the U.S. Cellular and HMS reporting units recognized in the third quarter of 2017. The loss on impairment of goodwill is not included as a component of Adjusted EBITDA. 2017-2016 Commentary Net income increased from 2016 to 2017 due primarily to the reduction of income tax expense as result of the Tax Act partially offset by a loss on impairment of goodwill at the U.S. Cellular and HMS reporting units. Income tax expense and the loss on impairment of goodwill are added back into Adjusted EBITDA. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was due primarily to a combination of improved operating results at TDS Telecom and cost savings initiatives at U.S. Cellular. * Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. 8 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 11MAR201607260845 U.S. CELLULAR OPERATIONS BUSINESS OVERVIEW U.S. Cellular owns, operates, and invests in wireless markets throughout the United States. U.S. Cellular is an 82%- owned subsidiary of TDS. U.S. Cellular’s strategy is to attract and retain wireless customers through a value proposition comprised of a high-quality network, outstanding customer service, and competitive devices, plans, and pricing, all provided with a local focus. OPERATIONS U.S. Cellular headquarters, Chicago, IL U.S. Cellular operations 12MAR201922384751 (cid:2) Serves customers with 5.0 million connections including 4.5 million postpaid, 0.5 million prepaid and 0.1 million reseller and other connections (cid:2) Operates in 22 states (cid:2) Employs approximately 5,600 associates (cid:2) 6,531 cell sites including 4,129 owned towers in service 9 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Trends and Developments U.S. Cellular’s mission is to provide exceptional wireless communication services which enhance consumers’ lives, increase the competitiveness of local businesses, and improve the efficiency of government operations in the mid-sized and rural markets served. Network and Technology: (cid:2) U.S. Cellular continues to devote efforts to enhance its network capabilities. VoLTE technology has been launched successfully in California, Iowa, Oregon, Washington and Wisconsin, and deployments in several additional operating markets will occur in 2019. VoLTE technology allows customers to utilize a 4G LTE network for both voice and data services, and offers enhanced services such as high definition voice and simultaneous voice and data sessions. In addition, the deployment of VoLTE technology expands U.S. Cellular’s ability to offer roaming services to other wireless carriers. (cid:2) 5G technology is expected to help address customers’ growing demand for data services as well as create opportunities for new services requiring high speed and reliability as well as low latency. U.S. Cellular is committed to continuous technology innovation and continues to prepare for deployment of 5G technology beginning in 2019, including commencing a trial utilizing 5G standards and equipment on its core LTE network in the fourth quarter of 2018. U.S. Cellular is partnering with leading companies in the wireless infrastructure and handset ecosystem to provide rich 5G experiences for customers. In addition, in the markets where U.S. Cellular commercially deploys 5G technology, which will include cities and towns large and small, customers using U.S. Cellular’s 4G LTE network will experience increased network speed due to U.S. Cellular’s modernization efforts. Asset Management: (cid:2) U.S. Cellular assesses its existing wireless interests on an ongoing basis with a goal of improving the competitiveness of its operations and maximizing its long-term return on capital. As part of this strategy, U.S. Cellular actively seeks attractive opportunities to acquire wireless spectrum, including pursuant to FCC auctions. In 2018, U.S. Cellular acquired $26 million of spectrum licenses through purchase and exchange transactions and divested $12 million of spectrum licenses covering non-strategic areas through sale and exchange transactions. In October 2018, the FCC announced that U.S. Cellular was a qualified bidder for Auction 101, which covered spectrum licenses that are expected to be used primarily to deliver 5G technology. Auction 101 closed on January 24, 2019 but the results of the auction have not yet been announced. Services and Products: (cid:2) U.S. Cellular’s customers are able to choose from a variety of national plans with voice, messaging and data usage options and pricing that are designed to fit different customer needs, usage patterns and budgets. In 2018, U.S. Cellular introduced the Unlimited with Payback plan that provides a monthly bill credit to postpaid customers if they have used less than 3 gigabytes of data per line. (cid:2) U.S. Cellular offers a comprehensive range of wireless devices such as handsets, tablets, modems, and hotspots. In addition, U.S. Cellular also offers a wide range of accessories, including wireless basics such as cases, screen protectors, chargers, and memory cards as well as an assortment of consumer electronics such as headphones, smart speakers, wearables and home automation products (e.g. cameras, sensors, and thermostats). U.S. Cellular offers certain of these products for purchase on installment plans, which allow new and existing postpaid customers to purchase these products payable over a specified time period. 10 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW Retail Connection Composition As of December 31, 2018 10% 90% Postpaid Prepaid 27FEB201912214439 As of December 31, Retail Connections – End of Period 2018 Postpaid Prepaid Total 4,472,000 516,000 4,988,000 2017 2016 4,518,000 4,482,000 519,000 5,037,000 484,000 4,966,000 12MAR201922385068 Year Ended December 31, Postpaid Activity and Churn Gross Additions 2018 2017 2016 Handsets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Connected Devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475,000 150,000 490,000 198,000 479,000 294,000 Total Gross Additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 625,000 688,000 773,000 Net Additions (Losses) Handsets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Connected Devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,000 (69,000) 38,000 (2,000) (70,000) 143,000 Total Net Additions (Losses) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (46,000) 36,000 73,000 Churn Handsets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Connected Devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Churn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.98% 2.96% 1.25% 0.99% 2.52% 1.21% 1.18% 2.11% 1.31% 2018-2017 Commentary Postpaid net additions decreased in 2018 due primarily to lower gross additions, as well as an increase in tablet churn. The decrease in connected devices gross additions reflects U.S. Cellular’s decision to discontinue promotions of heavily discounted tablets in 2018. 2017-2016 Commentary Postpaid net additions decreased in 2017 mainly due to lower connected devices net additions which reflected both lower tablet gross additions and an increase in tablet churn. The decline in tablet gross additions reflects industry-wide trends including (i) reduced consumer demand for network-connected tablets, and (ii) carriers including U.S. Cellular have curtailed promotions of heavily discounted tablets designed to stimulate demand due to poor economics. The decrease in connected devices net additions was partially offset by an improvement in handsets net additions driven by both higher gross additions and a decrease in churn. 11 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Postpaid Revenue Year Ended December 31, Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average Billings Per User (ABPU)1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average Revenue Per Account (ARPA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average Billings Per Account (ABPA)1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ 2018 44.98 58.67 118.93 155.11 $ $ $ $ 2017 44.38 55.60 118.96 149.02 $ $ $ $ 2016 46.96 56.12 124.09 148.29 1 Postpaid ABPU and Postpaid ABPA are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of these measures. 2018-2017 Commentary On January 1, 2018, U.S Cellular adopted the provisions of ASU 2014-09, using a modified retrospective method. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented, recognizing the cumulative effect of the accounting change as an adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2018. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details. Postpaid ARPU increased in 2018 due primarily to several factors including: increases in device protection plan and regulatory recovery revenues as well as having proportionately more handset connections, which on a per-unit basis contribute more revenue than tablet connections. Such factors were partially offset by the impact of adopting the provisions of ASU 2014-09, as well as the impact of overall price reductions on plan offerings. Postpaid ARPA decreased slightly in 2018 due primarily to a decrease in postpaid connections per account driven by higher tablet churn. Application of the new accounting standard had the impact of reducing ARPU and ARPA by $0.21 and $0.55, respectively. Under equipment installment plans, customers pay for their wireless devices in installments over a period of time. In order to show the trend in estimated cash collections from postpaid customer billings for service and equipment, U.S. Cellular has presented Postpaid ABPU and Postpaid ABPA, which are calculated as Postpaid ARPU and Postpaid ARPA plus average monthly installment plan billings per connection and account, respectively. Postpaid ABPU and ABPA increased in 2018 due primarily to (i) an increase in equipment installment plan billings driven by increased penetration of equipment installment plans and (ii) a higher average price per device sold. 2017-2016 Commentary Postpaid ARPU and Postpaid ARPA decreased in 2017 due primarily to industry-wide price competition resulting in overall price reductions on plan offerings. Equipment installment plan billings increased in 2017 due to increased penetration of equipment installment plans. Postpaid ABPU decreased in 2017 as the increase in equipment installment plan billings was more than offset by the decline in Postpaid ARPU discussed above. Postpaid ABPA, however, increased slightly in 2017 as the increase in equipment installment plan billings more than offset the decline in Postpaid ARPA discussed above. 12 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FINANCIAL OVERVIEW — U.S. CELLULAR Year Ended December 31, (Dollars in millions) Retail service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inbound roaming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other $ Service revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . System operations (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below) . . . . Cost of equipment sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on impairment of goodwill (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on sale of business and other exit costs, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP)2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/M - Percentage change not meaningful $ $ $ $ $ 20181 2,623 154 201 2,978 989 3,967 758 1,031 1,388 640 – 10 – (18) 3,809 158 164 790 963 515 $ $ $ $ $ $ 2017 2,589 129 260 2,978 912 3,890 732 1,071 1,412 615 370 17 (1) (22) 4,194 (304) 15 675 820 469 $ $ $ $ $ $ 2016 2,700 152 229 3,081 909 3,990 760 1,081 1,480 618 – 22 – (19) 3,942 48 49 669 816 446 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016 1% 20% (23)% – 8% 2% 4% (4)% (2)% 4% N/M (40)% N/M 20% (9)% N/M N/M 17% 17% 10% (4)% (15)% 13% (3)% – (3)% (4)% (1)% (4)% – N/M (22)% N/M (17)% 6% N/M (70)% 1% 1% 5% 1 As of January 1, 2018, U.S. Cellular adopted ASU 2014-09 using a modified retrospective approach. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information 2 Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. 13 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Operating Revenues (Dollars in millions) $25 $34 $77 $3,967 $31 $3 $3,890 $(59) $(111) $(23) $4,000 $3,990 $3,900 $3,800 $3,700 $3,600 $3,500 2016 Retail Service Inbound Roaming Other Service Equipment 2017 Retail Service Inbound Roaming Other Service Equipment 1MAR201900164169 2018 Service revenues consist of: (cid:2) Retail Service — Charges for access, airtime, recovery of regulatory costs and value added services, including data services and products (cid:2) Inbound Roaming — Charges to other wireless carriers whose customers use U.S. Cellular’s wireless systems when roaming (cid:2) Other Service — Amounts received from the Federal USF and tower rental revenues. Imputed interest on equipment installment plan contracts is included in 2017; however, it is not included in 2018 due to the impact of adopting the provisions of ASU 2014-09 Equipment revenues consist of: (cid:2) Sales of wireless devices and related accessories to new and existing customers, agents, and third-party distributors Key components of changes in the statement of operations line items were as follows: 2018-2017 Commentary Total operating revenues Retail service revenues increased in 2018 primarily as a result of the changes in Postpaid ARPU as previously discussed in the Operational Overview section. Inbound roaming revenues increased in 2018 primarily driven by data traffic, with significantly higher usage partially offset by lower rates. Other service revenues decreased year over year, reflecting the exclusion of imputed interest income in 2018 due to the impact of adopting the provisions of ASU 2014-09. The impact of imputed interest income was $73 million in 2017. Federal USF revenues remained flat year over year at $92 million. See the Regulatory Matters section in this MD&A for a description of the Phase II Connect America Mobility Fund (MF2 Order) and its expected impacts on U.S. Cellular’s Federal USF support. Equipment sales revenues increased in 2018 due primarily to the impact of adopting the provisions of ASU 2014-09 and an increase in the average revenue per device sold. Such factors were partially offset by a decrease in the number of devices sold. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details on the financial statement impact of ASU 2014-09. System operations expenses System operations expenses increased in 2018 due primarily to higher maintenance, utility and cell site rent expenses largely reflecting the growth in cell sites and other network facilities as U.S. Cellular continues to add capacity, enhance quality, and deploy new technologies. Cost of equipment sold Cost of equipment sold decreased in 2018 due primarily to a decrease in the number of devices sold, partially offset by an increase due to a higher average cost per device sold. Loss on equipment, defined as Equipment sales revenues less Cost of equipment sold, was $42 million and $159 million for 2018 and 2017, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expenses Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased in 2018 due primarily to lower sales commissions. 14 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Depreciation, amortization and accretion Depreciation, amortization, and accretion increased in 2018 due to additional network assets being placed into service as well as an increase in amortization expense related to billing system upgrades. (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net Loss on asset disposals, net decreased primarily as a result of fewer disposals of certain network assets. (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net Net gains in 2018 and 2017 were due to gains recognized on license sale and exchange transactions with various third parties. 2017-2016 Commentary Total operating revenues Service revenues decreased as a result of (i) a decrease in retail service revenues driven by industry-wide price competition resulting in overall price reductions on plan offerings; and (ii) a decrease in inbound roaming revenue mainly due to lower roaming rates. Such reductions were partially offset by an increase in imputed interest income due to an increase in the total number of active equipment installment plans. Federal USF revenue remained flat year over year at $92 million. See the Regulatory Matters section in this MD&A for a description of the FCC Mobility Fund Phase II Order (MF2 Order) and its expected impacts on U.S. Cellular’s current Federal USF support. Equipment sales revenues increased by a modest amount year over year reflecting an increase in average revenue per device sold, a mix shift to higher end smartphone devices and, to a lesser extent, an increase in accessories revenues. Such increases were almost entirely offset by a decrease in the number of devices sold, a reduction in guarantee liability amortization for equipment installment contracts as a result of changes in plan offerings, and lower device activation fees. System operations expenses System operations expenses decreased in 2017 as a result of (i) a decrease in customer usage expenses driven mainly by decreased circuit costs; and (ii) a decrease in roaming expenses driven primarily by lower roaming rates, partially offset by increased data roaming usage. Cost of equipment sold Cost of equipment sold decreased mainly due to a reduction in the number of devices sold partially offset by a mix shift from feature phones and connected devices to higher cost smartphones. Loss on equipment was $159 million and $172 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expenses Selling expenses decreased by $26 million due to lower advertising expenses, including a decrease in sponsorship expenses related to the termination of a naming rights agreement in 2016. Such reductions were partially offset by an increase in commissions expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased by $42 million mainly due to lower expenses for bad debts and phone programs, along with reductions in numerous other general and administrative expense categories. Loss on impairment of goodwill In 2017, U.S. Cellular recorded a $370 million loss on impairment related to goodwill. See Note 7 — Intangible Assets in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net Loss on asset disposals, net decreased primarily as a result of fewer disposals of certain network assets. (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net The net gains in 2017 and 2016 were due to license exchange transactions with third parties. 15 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 12MAR201602143799 TDS TELECOM OPERATIONS BUSINESS OVERVIEW TDS Telecom operates in two segments: Wireline and Cable. TDS Telecom’s business objective is to provide a wide range of communications services to both residential and commercial customers. OPERATIONS TDS Telecom headquarters, Madison, WI Wireline operations Cable operations 12MAR201922384348 (cid:2) TDS Telecom provides broadband, video and voice services to 1.2 million connections in 31 states. (cid:2) Employs approximately 2,700 employees. (cid:2) Wireline operates incumbent local exchange carriers (ILEC) and competitive local exchange carriers (CLEC) in 27 states. (cid:2) Cable operates primarily in Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, Utah and Oregon. 16 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Trends and Developments Growth Initiatives: (cid:2) In 2018 TDS Telecom acquired the communications network of Merrimac Communications, Ltd., and in 2017, acquired the fiber assets of Sun Prairie Utilities supporting its fiber deployment strategy for growth. Several additional new locations are currently being built with fiber to expand its footprint into attractive markets that are underserved today. (cid:2) TDS Telecom is also pursuing a strategy to invest in fiber construction in markets within its current footprint. Increased fiber deployment provides the opportunity to deliver more robust residential and consumer products which drives growth. (cid:2) In 2017 TDS Telecom acquired several small cable companies to further grow its markets. TDS Telecom will continue to pursue cable acquisitions that meet its criteria of having favorable competitive environments, attractive market demographics and the ability to grow broadband penetration. Technology & Support Systems: (cid:2) TDS Telecom’s Wireline segment continues to upgrade and expand its network to respond to the needs of its customers for greater bandwidth and advanced technologies. At December 31, 2018, fiber has been deployed to approximately 26% of ILEC service addresses. Fiber technology allows broadband speeds of up to 1 Gigabit per second (Gbps). In non-fiber markets, TDS Telecom has deployed advanced technologies to increase data speeds up to 100 Megabits per second (Mbps) to reach approximately 28% of ILEC service addresses. TDS Telecom continues to utilize federal and state funding mechanisms in order to extend broadband service to unserved and underserved markets. (cid:2) TDS Telecom’s Cable segment continues to make capacity investments in line with its strategy to increase broadband penetration in its markets. DOCSIS 3.0 technology is deployed to nearly all of Cable’s service addresses which allows it to offer enhanced transmission speeds and TDS Telecom has been enabling a next generation DOCSIS 3.1 broadband network which will be launched in the first half of 2019. TDS Telecom’s Cable segment is offering up to 1 Gbps service in its largest markets. Services and Products: (cid:2) TDS Telecom’s Wireline segment strives to be the preferred broadband provider in its ILEC markets. As such, TDS Telecom continues to invest in its network to offer higher speed data service. As of December 31, 2018, TDS Telecom was able to provide broadband service to 96% of its ILEC physical access lines. At December 31, 2018, 71% of the service addresses in its ILEC markets had 10 Mbps or faster service available and 49% of the service addresses in its ILEC markets had 25 Mbps or faster service available. (cid:2) TDS Telecom’s Wireline segment offers IPTV, branded as TDS TV, in order to leverage its high-speed network. TDS TV provides customers with connected-home DVRs, video-on-demand (VOD) and TV Everywhere. TDS Telecom offers TDS TV in 31 markets, enabling 226,000 or roughly 29% of its service addresses. Where TDS TV is not available, TDS Telecom partners with a satellite TV provider to allow for triple or double play bundling. TDS Telecom plans additional fiber expansion. (cid:2) TDS Telecom’s commercial service focus is on small- to medium-sized businesses and its sales efforts emphasize advanced IP-based data and voice services. (cid:2) TDS Telecom’s Cable segment seeks to expand broadband services and leverage that growth by bundling with video and voice services. In addition to providing enhanced broadband speeds through DOCSIS 3.0 technology, TDS Telecom also provides customers with a whole home entertainment solution branded as CatchTV. 17 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FINANCIAL OVERVIEW — TDS TELECOM Year Ended December 31, 20181 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016 (Dollars in millions) Operating revenues Wireline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ TDS Telecom operating revenues2 . . . . . . . . Operating expenses Wireline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TDS Telecom operating expenses2 . . . . . . . . TDS Telecom operating income . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP)3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ $ Numbers may not foot due to rounding. N/M - Percentage change not meaningful 699 230 927 604 231 834 93 89 303 313 232 $ $ $ $ $ $ 714 206 919 606 198 803 116 138 314 323 201 $ $ $ $ $ $ 698 185 882 621 183 803 79 54 278 283 162 (2)% 12% 1% – 17% 4% (20)% (35)% (4)% (3)% 15% 2% 11% 4% (2)% 8% – 47% N/M 13% 14% 24% 1 As of January 1, 2018, TDS adopted ASU 2014-09 using a modified retrospective approach. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. 2 Includes eliminations between the Wireline and Cable segments. 3 Refer to supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. Operating Revenues (Dollars in millions) $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 2018-2017 Commentary Operating revenues increased in 2018 due to Cable broadband and Cable and Wireline video connection growth and higher Wireline support revenue provided through the A-CAM program. Wireline wholesale access revenue and legacy voice and commercial products revenues decreased. 2017-2016 Commentary Operating revenues increased in 2017 for much the same reasons as in 2018. Cable Wireline 2016 2017 2018 12MAR201922384939 18 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Total operating expenses Operating expenses increased in 2018 due primarily to amortization of Cable franchise rights. See Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to Cable franchise rights. Operating expenses also increased due to higher Wireline and Cable video programming costs and Wireline network maintenance. In addition, operating expenses increased due to the impacts of adopting the provisions of ASU 2014-09. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Operating expenses were unchanged in 2017. 19 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 12MAR201602143799 WIRELINE OPERATIONS BUSINESS OVERVIEW TDS Telecom’s Wireline business provides broadband, video and voice services. These services are provided to residential, commercial, and wholesale customers in a mix of rural, small town and suburban markets, with the largest concentration of its customers in the Upper Midwest and the Southeast. TDS Telecom’s strategy is to offer its residential customers broadband, video, and voice services through value-added bundling. In its commercial business, TDS Telecom’s focus is on small- to medium-sized businesses and its sales efforts emphasize advanced IP-based data and voice services. OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW ILEC Residential Broadband Connections by Speeds Wireline Residential Revenue per Connection 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 33% 35% 12% 2016 25% 32% 32% 11% 2017 33% >50 Mbps 10 - 50 Mbps 29% 5 - 10 Mbps 0 - 5 Mbps 29% 9% 2018 28FEB201902130649 $48 $47 $46 $45 $44 $43 $42 $41 $40 $39 $47.24 $45.96 $43.87 2016 2017 28FEB201902131423 2018 Residential broadband customers are increasingly choosing higher speeds in ILEC markets with 62% choosing speeds of 10 Mbps or greater and 33% choosing speeds of 50 Mbps or greater. Increases in broadband speeds and broadband and video connection growth drove increases in average residential revenue per connection. Residential Connections Commercial Connections 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 45,300 229,500 48,600 54,000 228,600 235,400 310,600 290,600 274,100 Video Broadband Voice 2016 2017 2018 28FEB201902131103 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 21,400 20,600 157,400 143,000 20,600 130,500 Broadband Voice managedIP 150,900 146,500 134,000 2016 2017 2018 12MAR201922384569 Total residential connections decreased by 1% as declines in voice connections outpaced the growth in broadband and video connections. Total commercial connections decreased by 8% due primarily to decreases in voice connections in CLEC markets and managedIP. 20 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FINANCIAL OVERVIEW — WIRELINE Year Ended December 31, 20181 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016 (Dollars in millions) Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial Wholesale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Service revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment and product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of services (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below) . . . . Cost of equipment and products . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP)2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ Numbers may not foot due to rounding. N/M - Percentage change not meaningful 321 184 191 697 2 699 266 1 197 142 (3) – 604 95 106 234 243 176 $ $ $ $ $ 319 199 195 713 1 714 258 2 194 151 1 – 606 108 117 260 269 146 $ $ $ $ $ 309 212 175 696 2 698 258 2 200 159 2 (1) 621 77 83 237 242 108 1% (7)% (2)% (2)% 35% (2)% 3% (31)% 1% (5)% N/M N/M – (13)% (9)% (10)% (9)% 20% 3% (6)% 12% 2% (33)% 2% – (16)% (3)% (5)% (35)% N/M (2)% 41% 41% 10% 11% 35% 1 As of January 1, 2018, TDS adopted ASU 2014-09 using a modified retrospective approach. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. 2 Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. Operating Revenues (Dollars in millions) $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 Wholesale Commercial Residential 2016 2017 2018 28FEB201903034992 Residential revenues consist of: (cid:2) Broadband services, including fiber-based and other digital, premium and enhanced data services (cid:2) IPTV and satellite video services (cid:2) Voice services Commercial revenues consist of: (cid:2) High-speed and dedicated business internet services (cid:2) Voice services Wholesale revenues consist of: (cid:2) Network access services primarily to interexchange and wireless carriers for carrying data and voice traffic on TDS Telecom’s network and special access services to carriers and others (cid:2) Federal and State USF support 21 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Key components of changes in the statement of operations items were as follows: 2018-2017 Commentary Total operating revenues Residential revenues increased in 2018 due primarily to growth in video and broadband connections and price increases, partially offset by declines in voice connections. Average voice connections declined 7% while average video connections grew 12%. Commercial revenues decreased in 2018 due to declining connections and services mostly in CLEC markets. Wholesale revenues decreased in 2018 due primarily to decreases in network access and special access services, partially offset by increased support received from the A-CAM program. In January 2017, the FCC modified the USF high cost support program. Under this program, known as A-CAM, TDS received approximately $75 million in annual support which replaced approximately $50 million in annual USF support received in 2016. In 2018, TDS Telecom accepted an additional $3 million of support per year. TDS receives additional transition support payments in certain states. TDS Telecom received $86 million and $82 million in support payments in 2018 and 2017, respectively. The A-CAM support comes with an obligation to build defined broadband speeds to reach approximately 160,000 locations. Cost of services Cost of services increased in 2018 due to higher programming charges related to growth in video and contractor charges, partially offset by a decrease in the costs of purchasing unbundled network elements, provisioning circuits and providing long-distance services. Selling, general and administrative Selling, general and administrative increased in 2018 due to increases in legal expense and other taxes, partially offset by decreases in employee related expenses. Depreciation, amortization and accretion Depreciation, amortization and accretion decreased as certain assets became fully depreciated. 2017-2016 Commentary Total operating revenues Residential revenues increased in 2017 due primarily to growth in broadband revenues. Sales of higher tiered services and price increases for broadband increased revenues $9 million. IPTV average connections grew 13% increasing revenues $5 million, while average voice connections declined by 4% decreasing revenues by $6 million. Commercial revenues decreased in 2017 due to declining connections mostly in CLEC markets. Wholesale revenues increased in 2017 due primarily to increased support received from the A-CAM program. Cost of services Cost of services decreased in 2017 due to reduced costs of provisioning circuits, purchasing unbundled network elements and providing long-distance services, offset by increased charges related to growth in IPTV. Selling, general and administrative Selling, general and administrative decreased in 2017 due to decreases in employee related expense and in contributions to the Federal Universal Service Fund. Depreciation, amortization and accretion Depreciation, amortization and accretion decreased in 2017 as certain assets became fully depreciated. 22 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 31MAR201601464080 CABLE OPERATIONS BUSINESS OVERVIEW TDS Telecom’s Cable strategy is to expand its broadband services and leverage that growth by bundling with video and voice services. TDS Telecom seeks to be the leading provider of broadband services in its targeted markets by leveraging its core competencies in network management and customer focus. OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW Cable Connections 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 59,600 99,000 133,700 59,700 101,800 65,200 102,900 153,300 167,400 Voice Video Broadband 2016 2017 2018 28FEB201903034156 Cable connections grew 7% in 2018 due primarily to a 9% increase in broadband connections. 23 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FINANCIAL OVERVIEW — CABLE Year Ended December 31, 20181 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016 (Dollars in millions) Residential Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of services (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below) . . . . Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP)2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ $ $ Numbers may not foot due to rounding. N/M - Percentage change not meaningful 188 42 230 104 57 69 1 231 (2) (1) 69 70 56 $ $ $ $ $ $ 169 37 206 98 54 44 2 198 8 8 54 54 55 $ $ $ $ $ $ 147 38 185 94 51 37 2 183 2 2 41 41 54 11% 13% 12% 6% 6% 57% (33)% 17% N/M N/M 28% 29% 2% 15% (4)% 11% 4% 6% 21% (7)% 8% N/M N/M 33% 33% 2% 1 As of January 1, 2018, TDS adopted ASU 2014-09 using a modified retrospective approach. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. 2 Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. Operating Revenues (Dollars in millions) $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 Residential and Commercial revenues consist of: (cid:2) Broadband services, including high-speed internet, security and support services Commercial Residential (cid:2) Video services including premium programming in HD, multi-room and TV Everywhere offerings (cid:2) Voice services 2016 2017 2018 28FEB201903035151 24 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Key components of changes in the statement of operations items were as follows: 2018-2017 Commentary Total operating revenues Residential revenues increased in 2018 due to tuck-in acquisitions, growth in connections and customers purchasing higher value bundles. Commercial revenues increased in 2018 due primarily to video price increases and increased advertising sales. Cost of services Cost of services increased in 2018 due primarily to increases in video programming fees partially offset by a decrease in employee related expense. Selling, general and administrative Selling, general and administrative expenses increased in 2018 due to increased employee related expenses, IT-related expenses from a billing conversion and support and higher property and other taxes. Depreciation, amortization and accretion Depreciation, amortization and accretion increased in 2018 due to the amortization of franchise rights, a reduction in depreciable lives of customer premise equipment, and increases in plant. Effective January 1, 2018, Cable changed its estimated useful life for video franchise rights from indefinite-lived to 15 years due primarily to the effects of increasing competition and advancements in technology for delivering and consuming video programming, resulting in an additional $17 million in depreciation in 2018. See Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on franchise rights. 2017-2016 Commentary Total operating revenues Revenues increased in 2017 due primarily to growth in broadband connections and price increases. A change in classification of certain bulk broadband and video connections increased residential revenues and reduced commercial revenues by $6 million in 2017. Cost of services Cost of services increased in 2017 due primarily to increases in programming fees. Selling, general and administrative Selling, general and administrative expenses increased in 2017 due to increased IT-related expenses and acquisition expense. 25 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Sources of Liquidity TDS and its subsidiaries operate capital-intensive businesses. Historically, TDS has used internally-generated funds and also has obtained substantial funds from external sources for general corporate purposes. In the past, TDS’ existing cash and investment balances, funds available under its revolving credit agreements, receivables securitization agreement, funds from other financing sources, including a term loan and other long-term debt, and cash flows from operating, and certain investing and financing activities, including sales of assets or businesses, provided sufficient liquidity and financial flexibility for TDS to meet its normal day-to-day operating needs and debt service requirements, to finance the build-out and enhancement of markets and to fund acquisitions. There is no assurance that this will be the case in the future. See Market Risk for additional information regarding maturities of long-term debt. Although TDS currently has a significant cash balance, TDS has incurred negative free cash flow at times in the past and this could occur in the future. However, TDS believes that existing cash and investment balances, funds available under its revolving credit agreements, receivables securitization agreement and expected cash flows from operating and investing activities will provide sufficient liquidity for TDS to meet its normal day-to-day operating needs and debt service requirements for the coming year. TDS may require substantial additional capital for, among other uses, funding day-to-day operating needs including working capital, acquisitions of providers of cable, wireless or wireline telecommunications services, IT services or other businesses, spectrum license or system acquisitions, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, the repurchase of shares, the payment of dividends, or making additional investments. TDS, through U.S. Cellular, plans to participate in spectrum auctions in 2019 (see Regulatory Matters — Millimeter Wave Spectrum Auctions), and expects capital expenditures to increase in 2019 relative to 2018 levels, due primarily to continued fiber investments at TDS Telecom and investments at U.S. Cellular to enhance network speed and capacity and begin deploying 5G. It may be necessary from time to time to increase the size of the existing revolving credit agreements, to put in place new credit agreements, or to obtain other forms of financing in order to fund potential expenditures. TDS’ liquidity would be adversely affected if, among other things, TDS is unable to obtain short- or long-term financing on acceptable terms, TDS makes significant spectrum license purchases, TDS makes significant business acquisitions, the LA Partnership discontinues or significantly reduces distributions compared to historical levels, or Federal USF and/or other regulatory support payments decline. TDS’ credit rating currently is sub-investment grade. There can be no assurance that sufficient funds will continue to be available to TDS or its subsidiaries on terms or at prices acceptable to TDS. Insufficient cash flows from operating activities, changes in TDS’ credit ratings, defaults of the terms of debt or credit agreements, uncertainty of access to capital, deterioration in the capital markets, reduced regulatory capital at banks which in turn limits their ability to borrow and lend, other changes in the performance of TDS or in market conditions or other factors could limit or restrict the availability of financing on terms and prices acceptable to TDS, which could require TDS to reduce its acquisition, capital expenditure and business development programs, reduce the acquisition of spectrum licenses, and/or reduce or cease share repurchases and/or the payment of dividends. Any of the foregoing developments would have an adverse impact on TDS’ businesses, financial condition or results of operations. TDS cannot provide assurance that circumstances that could have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or capital resources will not occur. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include cash and money market investments. The primary objective of TDS’ Cash and cash equivalents investment activities is to preserve principal. Cash held by U.S. Cellular is for its operational needs and acquisition, capital expenditure and business development programs. TDS does not have direct access to U.S. Cellular cash unless U.S. Cellular pays a dividend on its common stock. U.S. Cellular has no current intention to pay a dividend to its shareholders. 26 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Cash and Cash Equivalents (Dollars in millions) $1,000 $900 $921 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 $619 U.S. Cellular TDS Telecom, TDS Corporate & Other 2016 2017 2018 28FEB201903034515 At December 31, 2018, TDS’ consolidated Cash and cash equivalents totaled $921 million compared to $619 million and $900 million at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The majority of TDS’ Cash and cash equivalents is held in bank deposit accounts and in money market funds that purchase only debt issued by the U.S. Treasury or U.S. government agencies across a range of eligible money market investments that may include, but are not limited to, government agency repurchase agreements, government agency debt, U.S. Treasury repurchase agreements, U.S. Treasury debt, and other securities collateralized by U.S. government obligations. TDS monitors the financial viability of the money market funds and direct investments in which it invests and believes that the credit risk associated with these investments is low. Financing Revolving Credit Agreements TDS and U.S. Cellular have unsecured revolving credit agreements available for general corporate purposes including acquisitions, spectrum purchases and capital expenditures. In May 2018, TDS entered into a new $400 million revolving credit agreement with certain lenders and other parties and U.S. Cellular entered into a new $300 million revolving credit agreement with certain lenders and other parties. Amounts under the revolving credit agreements may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed from time to time until maturity in May 2023. As a result of the new agreements, TDS’ and U.S. Cellular’s previous revolving credit agreements due to expire in June 2021 were terminated. As of December 31, 2018, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit agreements, except for letters of credit, and TDS and U.S. Cellular’s unused capacity under their revolving credit agreements was $399 million and $298 million, respectively. The continued availability of the revolving credit agreements requires TDS and U.S. Cellular to comply with certain negative and affirmative covenants, maintain certain financial ratios and provide representations on certain matters at the time of each borrowing. TDS and U.S. Cellular believe they were in compliance as of December 31, 2018, with all of the financial covenants and requirements set forth in their revolving credit agreements. See Financial Covenants below. See Note 11 — Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the revolving credit agreements. Term Loan In January 2015, U.S. Cellular entered into an unsecured senior term loan credit agreement. In July 2015, U.S. Cellular borrowed the full amount of $225 million available under this agreement in two separate draws. This term loan credit agreement was amended and restated in June 2016, and further amended in May 2018. Principal reductions are due and payable in quarterly installments of $3 million beginning in March 2016 through December 2021, and the remaining unpaid balance will be due and payable in January 2022. This agreement was entered into for general corporate purposes, including working capital, spectrum purchases and capital expenditures. 27 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The continued availability of the term loan agreement requires U.S. Cellular to comply with certain negative and affirmative covenants, maintain certain financial ratios and make representations regarding certain matters at the time of each borrowing, that are substantially the same as those in U.S. Cellular’s revolving credit agreement described above. TDS believes that U.S. Cellular was in compliance as of December 31, 2018, with all of the financial covenants and requirements set forth in the term loan agreement. See Financial Covenants below. See Note 11 — Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the term loan. Receivables Securitization Agreement In December 2017, U.S. Cellular, through its subsidiaries, entered into a $200 million credit agreement to permit securitized borrowings using its equipment installment receivables for general corporate purposes. U.S. Cellular entered into a performance guaranty whereby U.S. Cellular guarantees the performance of certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of U.S. Cellular under the agreement. Amounts under the receivables securitization agreement may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed from time to time until maturity in December 2019, which may be extended from time to time as specified therein. As of December 31, 2018, there were no outstanding borrowings under the receivables securitization agreement, and the entire unused capacity of $200 million was available, subject to sufficient collateral to satisfy the asset borrowing base provisions of the agreement. As of December 31, 2018, the USCC Master Note Trust (Trust) held $63 million of assets available to be pledged as collateral for the receivables securitization agreement. The continued availability of the receivables securitization agreement requires U.S. Cellular to comply with certain negative and affirmative covenants, maintain certain financial ratios and provide representations on certain matters at the time of each borrowing. TDS believes that U.S. Cellular was in compliance as of December 31, 2018, with all of the financial covenants and requirements set forth in its receivables securitization agreement. See Financial Covenants below. See Note 11 — Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the receivables securitization agreement. Financial Covenants As noted above, the TDS and U.S. Cellular revolving credit agreements, the U.S. Cellular senior term loan agreement and the U.S. Cellular receivables securitization agreement require TDS or U.S. Cellular, as applicable, to comply with certain affirmative and negative covenants, which include certain financial covenants. In particular, under these agreements, TDS and U.S. Cellular are required to maintain the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio at a level not lower than 3.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter. TDS and U.S. Cellular also are required to maintain the Consolidated Leverage Ratio at a level not to exceed 3.25 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter through June 30, 2019. From July 1, 2019 and thereafter, the Consolidated Leverage Ratio is not to exceed 3.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter. TDS and U.S. Cellular believe they were in compliance as of December 31, 2018, with all such financial covenants. Other Long-Term Financing TDS and U.S. Cellular each have an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 to issue senior or subordinated debt securities. The proceeds from any such issuances may be used for general corporate purposes, including: the possible reduction of other short-term or long-term debt; spectrum purchases; capital expenditures; in connection with acquisition, construction and development programs; for working capital; to provide additional investments in subsidiaries; or the repurchase of shares. The TDS shelf registration permits TDS to issue at any time and from time to time senior or subordinated debt securities in one or more offerings in an indeterminate amount. The U.S. Cellular shelf registration statement permits U.S. Cellular to issue at any time and from time to time senior or subordinated debt securities in one or more offerings, up to the amount registered, which is currently $500 million. The ability of TDS or U.S. Cellular to complete an offering pursuant to such shelf registration statements is subject to market conditions and other factors at the time. TDS believes that it and/or its subsidiaries were in compliance as of December 31, 2018, with all covenants and other requirements set forth in the TDS and U.S. Cellular long-term debt indentures. The TDS and U.S. Cellular long-term debt indentures do not include any financial covenants. TDS and U.S. Cellular have not failed to make nor do they expect to fail to make any scheduled payment of principal or interest under such indentures. 28 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The total long-term debt principal payments due for the next five years are $209 million, which represent 8% of the total gross long-term debt obligation at December 31, 2018. Refer to Market Risk — Long-Term Debt for additional information regarding required principal payments and the weighted average interest rates related to TDS’ Long-term debt. TDS and U.S. Cellular, at their discretion, may from time to time seek to retire or purchase their outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges for other securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers, exchange offers or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material. See Note 11 — Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on long-term financing. Credit Ratings In certain circumstances, TDS’ and U.S. Cellular’s interest cost on their various agreements may be subject to increase if their current credit ratings from nationally recognized credit rating agencies are lowered, and may be subject to decrease if the ratings are raised. The agreements do not cease to be available nor do the maturity dates accelerate solely as a result of a downgrade in TDS’ or U.S. Cellular’s credit rating. However, downgrades in TDS’ or U.S. Cellular’s credit rating could adversely affect their ability to renew the agreements or obtain access to other credit agreements in the future. TDS and U.S. Cellular are rated at sub-investment grade. TDS and U.S. Cellular’s credit ratings as of December 31, 2018, and the dates such ratings were re-affirmed were as follows: Rating Agency Moody’s (TDS) (re-affirmed September 2018) Moody’s (U.S. Cellular) (re-affirmed September 2018) Standard & Poor’s (re-affirmed October 2018) Fitch Ratings (re-affirmed April 2018) Capital Requirements Rating Outlook Ba2 Ba1 BB BB+ stable outlook stable outlook stable outlook stable outlook The discussion below is intended to highlight some of the significant cash outlays expected during 2019 and beyond and to highlight the spending incurred in prior years for these items. This discussion does not include cash required to fund normal operations, and is not a comprehensive list of capital requirements. Significant cash requirements that are not routine or in the normal course of business could arise from time to time. Capital Expenditures TDS makes substantial investments to acquire, construct and upgrade telecommunications networks and facilities to remain competitive and as a basis for creating long-term value for shareholders. In recent years, rapid changes in technology and new opportunities (such as 4G LTE and VoLTE technology in the Wireless business and fiber in the Wireline business) have required substantial investments in potentially revenue-enhancing and cost-saving upgrades to TDS’ networks to remain competitive; this is expected to continue in 2019 and future years with the deployment of 5G technology and the continued deployment of VoLTE in the Wireless business, and the continued deployment of fiber in the Wireline business. 29 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Capital expenditures (i.e., additions to property, plant and equipment and system development expenditures), which include the effects of accruals and capitalized interest, in 2018, 2017 and 2016 were as follows: Capital Expenditures (Dollars in millions) $694 $630 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 U.S. Cellular’s capital expenditures in 2018 were $515 million compared to $469 million in 2017 and $446 million in 2016. In 2018, these capital expenditures were used for the following purposes: (cid:2) Enhance and maintain U.S. Cellular’s network coverage, including continuing to deploy VoLTE technology in certain markets and providing additional capacity to accommodate increased data usage by current customers; and $767 (cid:2) Invest in information technology to support existing and new services and products. Corporate and Other Cable Wireline U.S. Cellular Capital expenditures for 2019 are expected to be between $625 million and $725 million. In addition to the purposes listed above, these expenditures are expected to be used to enhance network speed and begin deploying 5G technology. TDS Telecom’s capital expenditures in 2018 were $232 million compared to $201 million in 2017 and $162 million in 2016. In 2018, these capital expenditures were used for the following purposes: (cid:2) Maintain and enhance existing infrastructure including build-out requirements to meet state broadband and A-CAM programs; (cid:2) Upgrade broadband capacity and speeds; (cid:2) Support success-based spending to sustain IPTV, broadband and Cable growth; (cid:2) Build a TDS TV+ platform; and 2016 2017 2018 (cid:2) Expand fiber deployment inside and outside of current 28FEB201903034353 footprint. Capital expenditures in 2019 are expected to be between $300 million and $350 million. These expenditures are expected to be used for similar purposes as those listed above. TDS plans to finance its capital expenditures program for 2019 using primarily Cash flows from operating activities, existing cash balances and, if required, its receivables securitization and/or revolving credit agreements. Acquisitions, Divestitures and Exchanges TDS may be engaged from time to time in negotiations (subject to all applicable regulations) relating to the acquisition, divestiture or exchange of companies, properties, wireless spectrum and other possible businesses. In general, TDS may not disclose such transactions until there is a definitive agreement. 30 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS In July 2016, the FCC announced U.S. Cellular as a qualified bidder in the FCC’s forward auction of 600 MHz spectrum licenses, referred to as Auction 1002. In April 2017, the FCC announced by way of public notice that U.S. Cellular was the winning bidder for 188 licenses for an aggregate purchase price of $329 million. Prior to commencement of the forward auction, U.S. Cellular made an upfront payment to the FCC of $143 million in June 2016. U.S. Cellular paid the remaining $186 million to the FCC and was granted the licenses during the second quarter of 2017. In the table below, the $143 million deposit is included with the 2016 Cash payments for acquisitions. Cash Payments for Acquisitions (Dollars in millions) $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 $218 $196 Wireline Businesses Cable Businesses U.S. Cellular Licenses TDS assesses its business interests on an ongoing basis with a goal of improving the competitiveness of its operations and maximizing its long-term return on capital. As part of this strategy, TDS reviews attractive opportunities to acquire additional wireless operating markets and wireless spectrum, including pursuant to FCC auctions; and telecommunications, cable or other possible businesses. $16 2016 2017 2018 28FEB201902125853 TDS also may seek to divest outright or include in exchanges for other interests those interests that are not strategic to its long-term success. Total Cash received from divestitures and exchanges was $29 million, $21 million and $21 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Variable Interest Entities TDS consolidates certain ‘‘variable interest entities’’ as defined under GAAP. See Note 14 — Variable Interest Entities in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to these variable interest entities. TDS may elect to make additional capital contributions and/or advances to these variable interest entities in future periods in order to fund their operations. Common Share Repurchase Programs TDS and U.S. Cellular have repurchased their common shares and U.S. Cellular expects to continue to repurchase its common shares, subject to any available repurchase program. Share repurchases made under the TDS and U.S. Cellular programs were as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2018 Number of Shares Average Cost Per Share Dollar Amount (in millions) U.S. Cellular Common Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TDS Common Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 U.S. Cellular Common Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TDS Common Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – 2016 U.S. Cellular Common Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TDS Common Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154,449 111,700 $ $ $ – – – – 34.55 22.56 $ $ $ – – – – 5 3 31 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Depending on its future financial performance, construction, development and acquisition programs, and available sources of financing, TDS and U.S. Cellular may not have sufficient liquidity or capital resources to make significant share repurchases. Therefore, there is no assurance that TDS and U.S. Cellular will make any significant share repurchases in the future. For additional information related to the current TDS and U.S. Cellular repurchase authorizations, see Note 16 — Common Shareholders’ Equity in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements TDS had no transactions, agreements or other contractual arrangements with unconsolidated entities involving ‘‘off-balance sheet arrangements,’’ as defined by SEC rules, that had or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on its financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. Dividends TDS paid quarterly dividends per outstanding share of $0.160 in 2018, $0.155 in 2017 and $0.148 in 2016. TDS increased the dividend per share to $0.165 in the first quarter of 2019. See Note 16 — Common Shareholders’ Equity in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. TDS has no current plans to change its policy of paying dividends. CONTRACTUAL AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS At December 31, 2018, the resources required for contractual obligations were as follows: Payments Due by Period Less Than 1 Year 1 - 3 Years 3 - 5 Years More Than 5 Years (Dollars in millions) Long-term debt obligations1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest payments on long-term debt obligations . . Operating leases2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase obligations3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ Total 2,506 5,680 1,490 16 1,737 $ 20 167 170 1 1,444 31 332 300 2 215 880 $ $ 158 316 236 1 53 764 $ $ 2,297 4,865 784 12 25 7,983 $ 11,429 $ 1,802 $ 1 2 3 Includes current and long-term portions of debt obligations. The total long-term debt obligation differs from Total long-term debt, net due to capital leases, debt issuance costs, unamortized discounts related to U.S. Cellular’s 6.7% Senior Notes, and unamortized discounts related to the Installment payment agreement. See Note 11 — Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Includes future lease costs related to telecommunications plant facilities, office space, retail sites, cell sites, data centers and equipment. See Note 13 — Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Includes obligations payable under non-cancellable contracts, commitments for device purchases, network facilities and transport services, agreements for software licensing, long-term marketing programs, as well as certain agreements to purchase goods or services. Where applicable, TDS calculates its obligation based on termination fees that can be paid to exit the contract. The table above excludes potential liabilities related to ‘‘unrecognized tax benefits’’ as defined by GAAP because TDS is unable to predict the outcome or period of settlement of such liabilities. Such unrecognized tax benefits were $49 million at December 31, 2018. See Note 5 — Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on unrecognized tax benefits. See Note 13 — Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. 32 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS TDS operates a capital- and marketing-intensive business. TDS makes substantial investments to acquire wireless licenses and properties and to construct and upgrade communications networks and facilities as a basis for creating long-term value for shareholders. In recent years, rapid changes in technology and new opportunities have required substantial investments in potentially revenue-enhancing and cost-saving upgrades to TDS’ networks. TDS utilizes cash on hand, cash from operating activities, cash proceeds from divestitures and dispositions of investments, and short-term and long-term debt financing to fund its acquisitions (including spectrum licenses), construction costs, operating expenses and share repurchases. Cash flows may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year due to seasonality, the timing of acquisitions and divestitures, capital expenditures and other factors. The following discussion summarizes TDS’ cash flow activities in 2018, 2017 and 2016. 2018 Commentary TDS’ Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash increased $305 million in 2018. Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,017 million in 2018 due to net income of $175 million plus non-cash items of $906 million and distributions received from unconsolidated entities of $153 million, including $68 million in distributions from the LA Partnership. This was partially offset by changes in working capital items which decreased net cash by $217 million. The working capital changes were influenced primarily by a $149 million increase in equipment installment plan receivables, which are expected to continue to increase and further require the use of working capital in the near term. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 on January 1, 2018, caused fluctuations in working capital items in the Consolidated Balance Sheet; however, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 had no impact on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Cash flows used for investing activities were $680 million. Cash paid in 2018 for additions to property, plant and equipment totaled $776 million. This was partially offset by cash received from the redemption of short-term Treasury bills of $100 million. Cash flows used for financing activities were $32 million, reflecting ordinary activity such as the payment of dividends and the scheduled repayments of debt, partially offset by cash proceeds from reissuance of Common Shares pursuant to stock-based compensation plans. 2017 Commentary TDS’ Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash decreased $282 million in 2017. Net cash provided by operating activities was $776 million in 2017 due to net income of $157 million plus non-cash items of $742 million (including a $262 million loss on impairment of goodwill and a $369 million decrease in the deferred income tax liability) and distributions received from unconsolidated entities of $136 million, including $62 million in distributions from the LA Partnership. This was partially offset by changes in working capital items which decreased net cash by $259 million. The working capital changes were due primarily to a $261 million increase in equipment installment plan receivables. Cash flows used for investing activities were $981 million. Cash paid in 2017 for additions to property, plant and equipment totaled $685 million. Cash paid for acquisitions and licenses was $218 million which included the remaining $186 million due to the FCC for licenses U.S. Cellular won in Auction 1002. Cash paid for investments was $100 million which included the purchase of short-term Treasury bills. This was partially offset by Cash received from divestitures and exchanges of $21 million. Cash flows used for financing activities were $77 million, reflecting ordinary activity such as the payment of dividends and the scheduled repayments of debt. 2016 Commentary TDS’ Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash decreased $85 million in 2016. Net cash provided by operating activities was $782 million in 2016 due to net income of $52 million plus non-cash items of $882 million and distributions received from unconsolidated entities of $93 million, including $29 million in distributions from the LA Partnership. This was partially offset by changes in working capital items which decreased cash by $245 million. The working capital changes were due to a $246 million increase in equipment installment plan receivables. The net cash provided by operating activities was offset by cash flows used for investing activities of $808 million. Cash paid in 2016 for additions to property, plant and equipment totaled $636 million. In June 2016, U.S. Cellular made a deposit of $143 million to the FCC for its participation in Auction 1002. Cash paid for acquisitions and licenses in 2016 was $53 million partially offset by Cash received from divestitures and exchanges of $21 million. Cash flows used for financing activities were $59 million in 2016, reflecting ordinary activity such as the payment of dividends and the scheduled repayments of debt. 33 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS The following discussion addresses certain captions in the consolidated balance sheet and changes therein. This discussion is intended to highlight the significant changes and is not intended to fully reconcile the changes. Changes in financial condition during 2018 were as follows: Cash and cash equivalents See the Consolidated Cash Flow Analysis above for a discussion of cash and cash equivalents. Short-term investments Short-term investments decreased $83 million due to the maturity of U.S. Treasury Bills with original maturities of six months, partially offset by the purchase of additional U.S. Treasury Bills. Accounts receivable — customers and agents Accounts receivable — customers and agents increased $131 million due primarily to an increase in equipment installment plan receivables as well as ceasing to record deferred imputed interest as a result of the adoption of ASU 2014-09. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Assets held for sale Assets held for sale increased $44 million due primarily to the transfer of Licenses to Assets held for sale as a result of sale and exchange agreements that U.S. Cellular entered into in 2018. These agreements closed in the first quarter of 2019. Other assets and deferred charges Other assets and deferred charges increased $194 million due primarily to the creation of contract cost assets as a result of the adoption of ASU 2014-09. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Deferred income tax liability, net Deferred income tax liability, net, increased $88 million due primarily to the adoption of ASU 2014-09 increasing the net basis of assets on a U.S. GAAP basis without a corresponding increase in tax basis, as well as the impact of full expensing of qualified property additions following the enactment of the Tax Act. Treasury shares Treasury shares decreased $150 million due primarily to restricted stock units vesting and the exercise of stock options. Noncontrolling interests Noncontrolling interests increased $110 million due primarily to the issuance of U.S. Cellular stock pursuant to benefit plans, U.S. Cellular’s 2018 Net income, and the adoption of ASU 2014-09 which increased U.S. Cellular’s Retained earnings on January 1, 2018. APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES TDS prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. TDS’ significant accounting policies are discussed in detail in Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Management believes the application of the following critical accounting policies and the estimates required by such application reflect its most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of TDS’ consolidated financial statements. Management has discussed the development and selection of each of the following accounting policies and related estimates and disclosures with the Audit Committee of TDS’ Board of Directors. 34 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Intangible Asset Impairment Licenses and Goodwill represent a significant component of TDS’ consolidated assets. These assets are considered to be indefinite-lived assets and, therefore, are not amortized but rather are tested annually for impairment. TDS performs annual impairment testing of Licenses and Goodwill as of November 1 of each year, or more frequently if triggering events are present. Significant negative events, such as changes in any of the assumptions described below as well as decreases in forecasted cash flows, could result in an impairment in future periods. Licenses are tested for impairment at the level of reporting referred to as a unit of accounting. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the level of reporting referred to as a reporting unit. See Note 7 — Intangible Assets in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to Licenses and Goodwill activity in 2018 and 2017. Wireless Licenses — U.S. Cellular U.S. Cellular performs its annual impairment assessment of Licenses as of November 1 of each year, or more frequently if there are events or circumstances that cause U.S. Cellular to believe the carrying value of Licenses exceeds their fair value on a more likely than not basis. For purposes of its impairment testing of Licenses, U.S. Cellular separated its FCC licenses into eight units of accounting. The eight units of accounting consisted of one unit of accounting for developed operating market licenses (built licenses) and seven geographic non-operating market licenses (unbuilt licenses). U.S. Cellular performed a qualitative impairment assessment in 2018, and a quantitative impairment assessment in 2017, to determine whether an impairment existed. In 2018, U.S. Cellular considered several qualitative factors, including analysts’ estimates of license values which contemplated recent spectrum auction results, recent U.S. Cellular and other market participant transactions and other industry and market factors. Based on this assessment, U.S. Cellular concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the licenses in each unit of accounting exceeded their respective carrying values. Therefore, no impairment of licenses existed and no Step 1 quantitative impairment evaluation was completed. In 2017, a market approach was used to value the spectrum license portfolio. Within each unit of accounting, the licenses were segregated by type and by similar geographical area. The market approach develops an indication of fair value by calculating estimated market values using observable license purchase and auction transactions as a basis for such values for each pool of licenses. The sum of the fair values of the discrete pools represents the estimated fair value of U.S. Cellular’s licenses. Based on the assessment, the fair values of the license units of accounting exceeded their respective carrying values by amounts ranging from 16% to greater than 100%. Therefore, no impairment of licenses existed. Goodwill — TDS Telecom TDS Telecom has recorded Goodwill as a result of the acquisition of wireline and cable businesses. For purposes of the 2018 and 2017 Goodwill impairment tests, TDS Telecom had two reporting units: Wireline and Cable. Based on the results of the TDS Telecom annual Goodwill impairment assessment performed as of November 1, 2018, the fair values of the Wireline and Cable reporting units exceeded their carrying values. Therefore, no impairment of Goodwill was recorded for these reporting units. The discounted cash flow approach and guideline public company method were used to value the Wireline and Cable reporting units. The discounted cash flow approach uses value drivers and considers risks specific to the industry as well as current economic factors. The most significant assumptions made in this process were the revenue growth rate (shown as a compound annual growth rate in the table below), the terminal revenue growth rate and the discount rate. The guideline public company method develops an indication of fair value by calculating average market pricing multiples for selected publicly-traded companies. The developed multiples were applied to applicable financial measures of the respective reporting unit to determine fair value. The discounted cash flow approach and guideline public company method were weighted to arrive at the total fair value used for impairment testing. The weighting of methods was consistently applied in both 2018 and 2017. For purposes of the discounted cash flow approach, the following table represents key assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the Wireline and Cable reporting units as of November 1, 2018. There are uncertainties associated with these key assumptions and potential events and/or circumstances that could have a negative effect on the key assumptions described below. 35 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Key Assumptions Wireline Cable Revenue growth rate1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terminal revenue growth rate1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Discount rate2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2.9)% —% 6.0% 7.5% 2.0% 9.0% 1 There are risks that could negatively impact the projected revenue growth rates, including but not limited to the success of new and existing products/ services, competition, and operational difficulties. TDS Telecom’s reporting units use internally generated forecasts. These internally generated forecasts consider such things as observed demand, market factors and competitive knowledge. 2 The weighted average cost of capital is derived based on a set of guideline public companies and is an indicator of the cost of capital for a market participant in TDS Telecom’s industries. The weighted average cost of capital may increase if borrowing costs rise, market participants weight more of their capital structure towards equity vs. debt, long-term risk free interest rates increase, or other elements affecting the estimated cost of equity or debt increase. To the extent that the weighted average cost of capital of market participants increases or Wireline or Cable’s risk in relation to its peers increases, this would decrease the estimated fair value of the reporting units. Provided all other assumptions remained the same, the Wireline and Cable discount rates would have to increase to 9.6% and 10.6%, respectively, to yield estimated fair values equal to their respective carrying values at November 1, 2018. Further, provided all other assumptions remained the same, the Wireline and Cable terminal revenue growth rate assumptions would need to decrease to negative 5.8% and negative 0.1%, respectively, to yield an estimate of fair value equal to the carrying value of the respective reporting units at November 1, 2018. The Goodwill balances of the reporting units tested for impairment as of November 1, 2018, and the percentage by which the estimated fair value of the corresponding reporting units exceeded their carrying values, as a percentage of carrying value, was as follows: Reporting unit Goodwill balance Excess of estimated Fair Value over Carrying Value (Dollars in millions) Wireline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 409 100 28.4% 16.2% Income Taxes The amounts of income tax assets and liabilities, the related income tax provision and the amount of unrecognized tax benefits are critical accounting estimates because such amounts are significant to TDS’ financial condition and results of operations. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires TDS to calculate a provision for income taxes. This process involves estimating the actual current income tax liability together with assessing temporary differences resulting from the different treatment of items for tax purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred income tax assets and liabilities, which are included in TDS’ Consolidated Balance Sheet. TDS must then assess the likelihood that deferred income tax assets will be realized based on future taxable income and, to the extent management believes that realization is not likely, establish a valuation allowance. Management’s judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, deferred income tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance that is established for deferred income tax assets. TDS recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on management’s judgment as to the possible outcome that has a greater than 50% cumulative likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. See Note 5 — Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details regarding TDS’ income tax provision, deferred income taxes and liabilities, valuation allowances and unrecognized tax benefits, including information regarding estimates that impact income taxes. Equipment Installment Plans TDS sells devices and certain accessories to customers under installment contracts over a specified time period and, under certain of these plans, offers the customer a trade-in right. Customers on an installment contract who elect to trade-in the device will receive a credit in the amount of the outstanding balance of the installment contract, provided the customer trades-in an eligible used device in good working condition and purchases a new device from TDS. Equipment 36 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS revenue under these contracts is recognized at the time the device is delivered to the customer for the amount allocated to the equipment under ASU 2014-09. See Note 4 — Equipment Installment Plans in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Trade-In Right TDS values the trade-in right as a guarantee liability. This liability is initially measured at fair value and is determined based on assumptions including the probability and timing of the customer upgrading to a new device and the fair value of the device being traded-in at the time of trade-in. TDS reevaluates its estimate of the guarantee liability quarterly. A significant change in any of the aforementioned assumptions used to compute the guarantee liability would impact the amount of revenue recognized under these plans and the timing thereof. In 2018 and 2017, TDS assumed the earliest contractual time of trade-in, or the minimum amount of payments as specified in the device installment contract, for all customers on installment contracts with trade-in rights. When a customer exercises the trade-in option, both the outstanding receivable and guarantee liability balances related to the respective devices are reduced to zero, and the value of the used device that is received in the transaction is recognized as inventory. If the customer does not exercise the trade-in option at the time of eligibility, TDS begins amortizing the liability and records this amortization as additional equipment revenue. Allowance for doubtful accounts TDS maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses that result from the failure of its customers to make payments due under the equipment installment plans and accessory installment plans. The allowance is estimated based on historical experience, account aging and other factors that could affect collectability. When it is probable that an account balance will not be collected, the account balance is charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts. To the extent that actual loss experience differs significantly from historical trends, the required allowance amounts could differ from the original estimates. OTHER ITEMS Inflation Management believes that inflation affects TDS’ business to no greater or lesser extent than the general economy. Seasonality TDS’ profitability historically has been lower in the fourth quarter as a result of U.S. Cellular’s significant marketing and promotional activity during the holiday season. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements See Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on recently issued accounting pronouncements. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions See Note 20 — Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. REGULATORY MATTERS FCC Mobility Fund Phase II Order In October 2011, the FCC adopted its USF/Intercarrier Compensation Transformation Order (USF Order). Pursuant to this order, U.S. Cellular’s then current Federal USF support was to be phased down at the rate of 20% per year beginning July 1, 2012. The USF Order contemplated the establishment of a new mobile USF program (i.e., the Phase II Connect America Mobility Fund or ‘‘MF2’’) and provided for a pause in the phase down if that program was not timely implemented by July 2014. MF2 was not operational as of July 2014 and, therefore, as provided by the USF Order, the phase down was suspended at 60% of the baseline amount until such time as the FCC had taken steps to establish the MF2. In February 2017, the FCC adopted the MF2 Order addressing the framework for MF2 and the resumption of the phase down. The MF2 Order establishes a support fund of $453 million annually for ten years to be distributed through a market-based, multi-round reverse auction. For areas that receive support under MF2, legacy support to MF2 Auction winners will terminate and be replaced with MF2 support effective the first day of the month following release of the 37 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS public notice closing the auction. Legacy support in areas where the legacy support recipient is not an MF2 winner will be subject to phase down over two years unless there is no winner in a particular census block, in which case it will be continued for one legacy support recipient only. The MF2 Order further states that the phase down of legacy support for areas that were not eligible for support under MF2 will commence on the first day of the month following the completion of the auction and will conclude two years later. In August 2017, the FCC adopted the MF2 Challenge Process Order, which laid out procedures for establishing areas that would be eligible for support under the MF2 program. This included a collection process to be followed by a challenge window, a challenge response window, and finally adjudication of any coverage disputes. In September 2017, the FCC issued a public notice initiating the collection of 4G LTE coverage data. Responses submitting the collected data were due on January 4, 2018. On February 27, 2018, the FCC issued public notices providing detailed challenge procedures and a schedule for the challenge process. Pursuant to these notices, the challenge window began on March 29, 2018, and closed on November 26, 2018. Under the MF2 Challenge Process Order, no earlier than thirty days after the FCC processes the challenges, the FCC would open a thirty-day challenge response window. Following the challenge response window, the FCC would then adjudicate any disputes. This entire process must be completed before an auction can be commenced. On December 7, 2018, the FCC announced that it is investigating whether one or more carriers had violated the MF2 mapping rules and submitted incorrect maps. Pending the outcome of this investigation, the FCC suspended the challenge process. U.S. Cellular cannot predict at this time when the MF2 auction will occur, when the phase down period for its existing legacy support from the Federal USF will commence, or whether the MF2 auction will provide opportunities to U.S. Cellular to offset any loss in existing support. FCC Connect America Fund In 2017, TDS began receiving $75 million per year for 10 years (with incremental funding for transition in the early years for certain states) for operating and maintaining its network along with the obligation to provide broadband service at various speeds to about 160,000 locations. In May 2018, TDS Telecom accepted an offer issued by the FCC to receive an additional $3 million of support per year for ten years retroactive to January 2017 along with corresponding build-out obligations. In December 2018, the FCC issued an order authorizing additional funding to companies that currently receive A-CAM support if they expand the number of locations that offer 25⁄3 Mbps broadband service in their service areas. To provide A-CAM companies sufficient time to meet the increased deployment obligations a modified term of support and deployment of ten years, beginning January 1, 2019, and running until December 31, 2028, will be offered. The order became effective when it was published in the Federal Register on February 19, 2019. Once the Wireline Competition Bureau issues a notice announcing revised support amounts and corresponding buildout obligations for acceptance, A-CAM companies will have 30 days to accept the offer of additional support. TDS Telecom could receive almost $200 million in new funding. In total, A-CAM support would then exceed $1 billion in funding over the 12-year implementation horizon. FCC Rulemaking — Restoring Internet Freedom In December 2017, the FCC approved rules reversing or revising decisions made in the FCC’s 2015 Open Internet and Title II Order (Restoring Internet Freedom). The 2017 action reversed the FCC’s 2015 decision to reclassify Broadband Internet Access Services as telecommunications services subject to regulation under Title II of the Telecommunications Act. The 2017 action also reversed the FCC’s 2015 restrictions on blocking, throttling and paid prioritization, and modified transparency rules relating to such practices. Parties are pursuing legal proceedings challenging the 2017 actions. TDS cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings or the impact on its business. A number of states, including certain states in which TDS operates, have adopted or considered laws intended to reinstate aspects of the foregoing net neutrality regulations that were reversed or revised by the FCC in 2017. To the extent such laws are enacted, it is expected that legal proceedings will be pursued challenging such laws. TDS cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings or the impact on its business. 38 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Millimeter Wave Spectrum Auctions At its open meeting on August 2, 2018, the FCC adopted a public notice establishing procedures for two auctions of spectrum licenses in the 28 GHz and 24 GHz bands. The 28 GHz auction (Auction 101) commenced on November 14, 2018 and closed on January 24, 2019. Auction 101 offered two 425 MHz licenses in the 28 GHz band over portions of the United States that do not have incumbent licensees. The 24 GHz auction (Auction 102) will offer up to seven 100 MHz licenses in the 24 GHz band in Partial Economic Areas covering most of the United States. Upfront payments for Auction 102 were due by February 19, 2019, and bidding in Auction 102 is scheduled to begin on March 14, 2019. U.S. Cellular filed applications to participate in both auctions on September 18, 2018, and was announced as a qualified bidder for Auction 101 on October 31, 2018. The FCC has not announced qualified bidders for Auction 102. Also, at the open meeting on August 2, 2018, the FCC adopted a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in preparation for an additional Millimeter Wave auction offering licenses in the 37, 39 and 47 GHz bands. FCC statements indicate plans to hold this auction in the second half of 2019. 39 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 SAFE HARBOR CAUTIONARY STATEMENT This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this Annual Report contain statements that are not based on historical facts and represent forward-looking statements, as this term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that address activities, events or developments that TDS intends, expects, projects, believes, estimates, plans or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The words ‘‘believes,’’ ‘‘anticipates,’’ ‘‘estimates,’’ ‘‘expects,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘intends,’’ ‘‘projects’’ and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward- looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying them. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be significantly different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, those set forth below. See ‘‘Risk Factors’’ in TDS’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, for a further discussion of these risks. Each of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. However, such factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements contained in this document. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could have material adverse effects on future results, performance or achievements. TDS undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Readers should evaluate any statements in light of these important factors. (cid:2) Intense competition in the markets in which TDS operates could adversely affect TDS’ revenues or increase its costs to compete. (cid:2) A failure by TDS to successfully execute its business strategy (including planned acquisitions, spectrum acquisitions, fiber builds, divestitures and exchanges) or allocate resources or capital effectively could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) Uncertainty in TDS’ future cash flow and liquidity or the inability to access capital, deterioration in the capital markets, other changes in TDS’ performance or market conditions, changes in TDS’ credit ratings or other factors could limit or restrict the availability of financing on terms and prices acceptable to TDS, which could require TDS to reduce its construction, development or acquisition programs, reduce the amount of spectrum licenses acquired, and/or reduce or cease share repurchases and/or the payment of dividends. (cid:2) TDS has a significant amount of indebtedness which could adversely affect its financial performance and in turn adversely affect its ability to make payments on its indebtedness, comply with terms of debt covenants and incur additional debt. (cid:2) Changes in roaming practices or other factors could cause TDS’ roaming revenues to decline from current levels, roaming expenses to increase from current levels and/or impact TDS’ ability to service its customers in geographic areas where TDS does not have its own network, which could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) A failure by TDS to obtain access to adequate radio spectrum to meet current or anticipated future needs and/or to accurately predict future needs for radio spectrum could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) To the extent conducted by the FCC, TDS may participate in FCC auctions for additional spectrum or for funding in certain Universal Service programs in the future directly or indirectly and, during certain periods, will be subject to the FCC’s anti-collusion rules, which could have an adverse effect on TDS. (cid:2) Failure by TDS to timely or fully comply with any existing applicable legislative and/or regulatory requirements or changes thereto could adversely affect TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) An inability to attract people of outstanding talent throughout all levels of the organization, to develop their potential through education and assignments, and to retain them by keeping them engaged, challenged and properly rewarded could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. 40 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cid:2) TDS’ assets and revenue are concentrated primarily in the U.S. telecommunications industry. Consequently, its operating results may fluctuate based on factors related primarily to conditions in this industry. (cid:2) TDS’ smaller scale relative to larger competitors that may have greater financial and other resources than TDS could cause TDS to be unable to compete successfully, which could adversely affect its business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) Changes in various business factors, including changes in demand, customer preferences and perceptions, price competition, churn from customer switching activity and other factors, could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) Advances or changes in technology could render certain technologies used by TDS obsolete, could put TDS at a competitive disadvantage, could reduce TDS’ revenues or could increase its costs of doing business. (cid:2) Complexities associated with deploying new technologies present substantial risk and TDS’ investments in unproven technologies may not produce the benefits that TDS expects. (cid:2) TDS receives regulatory support and is subject to numerous surcharges and fees from federal, state and local governments, and the applicability and the amount of the support and fees are subject to great uncertainty, which could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) Performance under device purchase agreements could have a material adverse impact on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) Changes in TDS’ enterprise value, changes in the market supply or demand for wireless licenses, wireline or cable markets or IT service providers, adverse developments in the businesses or the industries in which TDS is involved and/or other factors could require TDS to recognize impairments in the carrying value of its licenses, goodwill, franchise rights and/or physical assets or require re-evaluation of the indefinite-lived nature of such assets. (cid:2) Costs, integration problems or other factors associated with acquisitions, divestitures or exchanges of properties or licenses and/or expansion of TDS’ businesses could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) A failure by TDS to complete significant network construction and systems implementation activities as part of its plans to improve the quality, coverage, capabilities and capacity of its network, support and other systems and infrastructure could have an adverse effect on its operations. (cid:2) Difficulties involving third parties with which TDS does business, including changes in TDS’ relationships with or financial or operational difficulties of key suppliers or independent agents and third party national retailers who market TDS’ services, could adversely affect TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) TDS has significant investments in entities that it does not control. Losses in the value of such investments could have an adverse effect on TDS’ financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) A failure by TDS to maintain flexible and capable telecommunication networks or information technology, or a material disruption thereof, could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) TDS has experienced and, in the future, expects to experience cyber-attacks or other breaches of network or information technology security of varying degrees on a regular basis, which could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) Changes in facts or circumstances, including new or additional information, could require TDS to record adjustments to amounts reflected in the financial statements, which could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) Disruption in credit or other financial markets, a deterioration of U.S. or global economic conditions or other events could, among other things, impede TDS’ access to or increase the cost of financing its operating and investment activities and/or result in reduced revenues and lower operating income and cash flows, which would have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) Settlements, judgments, restraints on its current or future manner of doing business and/or legal costs resulting from pending and future litigation could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. 41 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cid:2) The possible development of adverse precedent in litigation or conclusions in professional studies to the effect that radio frequency emissions from wireless devices and/or cell sites cause harmful health consequences, including cancer or tumors, or may interfere with various electronic medical devices such as pacemakers, could have an adverse effect on TDS’ wireless business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) Claims of infringement of intellectual property and proprietary rights of others, primarily involving patent infringement claims, could prevent TDS from using necessary technology to provide products or services or subject TDS to expensive intellectual property litigation or monetary penalties, which could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations. (cid:2) Certain matters, such as control by the TDS Voting Trust and provisions in the TDS Restated Certificate of Incorporation, may serve to discourage or make more difficult a change in control of TDS or have other consequences. (cid:2) The market price of TDS’ Common Shares is subject to fluctuations due to a variety of factors. (cid:2) Any of the foregoing events or other events could cause revenues, earnings, capital expenditures and/or any other financial or statistical information to vary from TDS’ forward-looking estimates by a material amount. 42 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS MARKET RISK Long-Term Debt As of December 31, 2018, the majority of TDS’ long-term debt was in the form of fixed-rate notes with remaining maturities ranging up to 46 years. Fluctuations in market interest rates can lead to significant fluctuations in the fair value of these fixed-rate notes. The following chart presents the scheduled principal payments on long-term debt by maturity dates at December 31, 2018: U.S. Cellular Term Loan due 2022 6.7% - U.S. Cellular - Institutional due 2033 6.625% - TDS - Retail (TDI) due 2045 6.875% - TDS - Retail (TDE) due 2059 7.0% - TDS - Retail (TDJ) due 2060 6.95% - U.S. Cellular - Retail (UZA) due 2060 5.875% - TDS - Retail (TDA) due 2061 7.25% - U.S. Cellular - Retail (UZB) due 2063 7.25% - U.S. Cellular - Retail (UZC) due 2064 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 9 5 0 2 1 6 0 2 27FEB201912214101 3 6 0 2 9 1 0 2 1 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 5 2 0 2 7 2 0 2 9 2 0 2 1 3 0 2 3 3 0 2 5 3 0 2 7 3 0 2 9 3 0 2 1 4 0 2 3 4 0 2 5 4 0 2 7 4 0 2 9 4 0 2 1 5 0 2 3 5 0 2 5 5 0 2 7 5 0 2 43 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table presents the scheduled principal payments on long-term debt, capital lease obligations, and other installment arrangements, and the related weighted average interest rates by maturity dates at December 31, 2018: Principal Payments Due by Period Long-Term Debt Obligations1 Weighted-Avg. Interest Rates on Long-Term Debt Obligations2 (Dollars in millions) 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 21 21 12 158 — 2,300 2,512 3.2% 3.2% 5.0% 5.0% 6.6% 6.9% 6.7% 1 The total long-term debt obligation differs from Long-term debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheet due to unamortized debt issuance costs on all non-revolving debt instruments, unamortized discounts related to U.S. Cellular’s 6.7% Senior Notes, and unamortized discounts related to the Installment payment agreement. See Note 11 — Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. 2 Represents the weighted average interest rates at December 31, 2018, for debt maturing in the respective periods. Fair Value of Long-Term Debt At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the estimated fair value of long-term debt obligations, excluding capital lease obligations, other installment arrangements, the current portion of such long-term debt and debt financing costs, was $2,309 million and $2,499 million, respectively. See Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Other Market Risk Sensitive Instruments The substantial majority of TDS’ other market risk sensitive instruments (as defined in Item 305 of SEC Regulation S-K) are short-term, including Cash and cash equivalents. Accordingly, TDS believes that a significant change in interest rates would not have a material effect on such other market risk sensitive instruments. 44 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION RELATING TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES TDS sometimes uses information derived from consolidated financial information but not presented in its financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP to evaluate the performance of its business. Certain of these measures are considered ‘‘non-GAAP financial measures’’ under U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rules. Specifically, TDS has referred to the following measures in this Form 10-K Report: (cid:2) EBITDA (cid:2) Adjusted EBITDA (cid:2) Adjusted OIBDA (cid:2) Free cash flow (cid:2) Postpaid ABPU (cid:2) Postpaid ABPA Following are explanations of each of these measures: EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted OIBDA EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted OIBDA are defined as net income adjusted for the items set forth in the reconciliation below. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted OIBDA are not measures of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to Net income or Cash flows from operating activities, as indicators of cash flows or as measures of liquidity. TDS does not intend to imply that any such items set forth in the reconciliation below are non-recurring, infrequent or unusual; such items may occur in the future. Adjusted EBITDA is a segment measure reported to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of making decisions about allocating resources to the segments and assessing their performance. See Note 18 — Business Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Management uses Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted OIBDA as measurements of profitability and, therefore, reconciliations to applicable GAAP income measures are deemed appropriate. Management believes Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted OIBDA are useful measures of TDS’ operating results before significant recurring non-cash charges, gains and losses, and other items as presented below as they provide additional relevant and useful information to investors and other users of TDS’ financial data in evaluating the effectiveness of its operations and underlying business trends in a manner that is consistent with management’s evaluation of business performance. Adjusted EBITDA shows adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and accretion, and gains and losses, while Adjusted OIBDA reduces this measure further to exclude Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities and Interest and dividend income in order to more effectively show the performance of operating activities excluding investment activities. The following table reconciles EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted OIBDA to the corresponding GAAP measures, Net income or Income (loss) before income taxes and Operating income (loss). Income tax expense is not provided at the individual segment level for Wireline and Cable. TDS calculates income tax expense for TDS Telecom in total. 45 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS TDS — CONSOLIDATED 20181 2017 $ 175 $ 157 $ (Dollars in millions) Net income (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add back or deduct: Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EBITDA (Non-GAAP) Add back or deduct: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on impairment of goodwill (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on sale of business and other exit costs, net . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) Deduct: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deduct: Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on impairment of goodwill (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on sale of business and other exit costs, net . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 172 883 1,276 – 9 – (18) 1,267 160 26 2 1,079 883 – 9 – (18) (279) 170 844 892 262 21 (1) (22) 137 15 4 996 844 262 21 (1) (22) 1,152 1,118 2016 52 40 170 850 1,112 – 27 (1) (20) 140 11 3 964 850 – 27 (1) (20) 108 Operating income (loss) (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 205 $ (108) $ U.S. CELLULAR 20181 2017 2016 (Dollars in millions) Net income (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add back or deduct: Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EBITDA (Non-GAAP) Add back or deduct: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on impairment of goodwill (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on sale of business and other exit costs, net . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) Deduct: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deduct: Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on impairment of goodwill (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on sale of business and other exit costs, net . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 164 $ 15 $ 51 116 640 971 – 10 – (18) 963 159 15 (1) 790 640 – 10 – (18) (287) 113 615 456 370 17 (1) (22) 820 137 8 – 675 615 370 17 (1) (22) Operating income (loss) (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 158 $ (304) $ 49 33 113 618 813 – 22 – (19) 816 140 6 1 669 618 – 22 – (19) 48 46 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS TDS TELECOM 20181 2017 2016 $ 89 $ 138 $ (Dollars in millions) Net income (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add back or deduct: Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EBITDA (Non-GAAP) Add back or deduct: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) Deduct: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deduct: Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 (2) 212 315 (2) – 313 8 2 303 212 (2) – (13) – 195 319 3 – 323 5 3 314 195 3 – 116 $ 20181 2017 2016 Operating income (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 93 $ Numbers may not foot due to rounding. WIRELINE (Dollars in millions) Income before income taxes (GAAP) Add back or deduct: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 106 $ 117 $ Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EBITDA (Non-GAAP) Add back or deduct: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) Deduct: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deduct: Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) 142 247 (3) – 243 7 3 234 142 (3) – Operating income (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 95 $ Numbers may not foot due to rounding. – 151 267 1 – 269 5 3 260 151 1 – 108 $ 47 54 32 (1) 196 280 4 (1) 283 3 3 278 196 4 (1) 79 83 (1) 159 241 2 (1) 242 3 3 237 159 2 (1) 77 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS CABLE 20181 2017 2016 $ (1) $ 8 $ (Dollars in millions) Income (loss) before income taxes (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add back: Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EBITDA (Non-GAAP) Add back or deduct: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) Deduct: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deduct: Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net 69 69 1 70 1 69 69 1 44 52 2 54 – 54 44 2 8 $ 2 37 38 2 41 – 41 37 2 2 Operating income (loss) (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (2) $ Numbers may not foot due to rounding. 1 As of January 1, 2018, TDS adopted ASU 2014-09 using a modified retrospective approach. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Free Cash Flow The following table presents Free cash flow. Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure which TDS believes may be useful to investors and other users of its financial information in evaluating liquidity, specifically, the amount of net cash generated by business operations after deducting Cash paid for additions to property, plant and equipment. (Dollars in millions) Cash flows from operating activities (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Cash paid for additions to property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . Free cash flow (Non-GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 2018 1,017 776 241 $ $ 2017 776 685 91 $ $ 2016 782 636 146 48 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Postpaid ABPU and Postpaid ABPA U.S. Cellular presents Postpaid ABPU and Postpaid ABPA to reflect the revenue shift from Service revenues to Equipment and product sales resulting from the increased adoption of equipment installment plans. Postpaid ABPU and Postpaid ABPA, as previously defined, are non-GAAP financial measures which U.S. Cellular believes are useful to investors and other users of its financial information in showing trends in both service and equipment and product sales revenues received from customers. 20181 2017 2016 (Dollars and connection counts in millions) Calculation of Postpaid ARPU Postpaid service revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average number of postpaid connections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of months in period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Postpaid ARPU (GAAP metric) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Calculation of Postpaid ABPU Postpaid service revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment installment plan billings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total billings to postpaid connections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average number of postpaid connections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of months in period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Postpaid ABPU (Non-GAAP metric) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Calculation of Postpaid ARPA Postpaid service revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average number of postpaid accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of months in period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Postpaid ARPA (GAAP metric) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Calculation of Postpaid ABPA Postpaid service revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment installment plan billings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total billings to postpaid accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average number of postpaid accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of months in period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,417 4.48 12 44.98 2,417 735 3,152 4.48 12 58.67 2,417 1.69 12 118.93 2,417 735 3,152 1.69 12 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,389 4.49 12 44.38 2,389 604 2,993 4.49 12 55.60 2,389 1.67 12 118.96 2,389 604 2,993 1.67 12 2,517 4.47 12 46.96 2,517 491 3,008 4.47 12 56.12 2,517 1.69 12 124.09 2,517 491 3,008 1.69 12 Postpaid ABPA (Non-GAAP metric) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 155.11 $ 149.02 $ 148.29 Numbers may not foot due to rounding 1 As of January 1, 2018, TDS adopted ASU 2014-09 using a modified retrospective approach. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. 49 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Year Ended December 31, (Dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts) Operating revenues 2018 2017 2016 Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment and product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,999 1,110 5,109 $ 3,979 1,065 5,044 4,050 1,105 5,155 Operating expenses Cost of services (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of equipment and products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on impairment of goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net (Gain) loss on sale of business and other exit costs, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,206 1,130 1,694 883 — 9 — (18) 4,904 1,164 1,195 1,689 844 262 21 (1) (22) 5,152 1,189 1,240 1,762 850 — 27 (1) (20) 5,047 Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 (108) 108 Investment and other income (expense) Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net Total investment and other income (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to TDS shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TDS Preferred dividend requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income available to TDS common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Basic weighted average shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings per share available to TDS common shareholders . . . . . . . . Diluted weighted average shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per share available to TDS common shareholders . . . . . . . $ $ 160 26 (172) 2 16 221 46 175 40 135 – 135 112 1.20 114 1.17 $ $ $ 137 15 (170) 4 (14) (122) (279) 157 4 153 – 153 111 1.39 112 1.37 $ $ $ 140 11 (170) 3 (16) 92 40 52 9 43 – 43 110 0.39 111 0.39 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 50 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (Dollars in millions) Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income Change in net unrealized gain on equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change related to retirement plan Amounts included in net periodic benefit cost for the period Net actuarial gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change related to retirement plan, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive income attributable to TDS shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 175 $ 157 $ – – (10) (1) (11) 3 (8) (8) 167 40 127 – 2 (3) (2) (3) 1 (2) (2) 155 4 151 $ $ 52 1 2 – (2) – – – 1 53 9 44 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 51 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Year Ended December 31, (Dollars in millions) Cash flows from operating activities 2018 2017 2016 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add (deduct) adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities $ 175 $ 157 $ Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bad debts expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes, net Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distributions from unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on impairment of goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in assets and liabilities from operations Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment installment plans receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer deposits and deferred revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued taxes Other assets and liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 883 101 54 33 (160) 153 — 9 (18) 4 (39) (149) (5) 2 8 (29) (5) Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,017 Cash flows from investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash paid for additions to property, plant and equipment Cash paid for acquisitions and licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash received for investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash paid for investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash received from divestitures and exchanges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Federal Communications Commission deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash flows from financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repayment of long-term debt TDS Common Shares reissued for benefit plans, net of tax payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U.S. Cellular Common Shares reissued for benefit plans, net of tax payments . . . . . . . . . . Repurchase of TDS Common Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repurchase of U.S. Cellular Common Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends paid to TDS shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distributions to noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash Beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . End of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (776) (16) 100 (17) 29 — — (680) — (20) 42 18 — — (72) (6) 6 (32) 305 622 927 844 95 46 (369) (137) 136 262 21 (22) 2 (61) (261) 6 (7) (4) 37 31 776 (685) (218) — (100) 21 — 1 (981) — (17) 4 1 — — (69) (4) 8 (77) (282) $ 904 622 $ 52 850 102 42 22 (140) 93 — 27 (20) (1) (23) (246) 4 36 (52) 60 (24) 782 (636) (53) — — 21 (143) 3 (808) 2 (12) 9 6 (3) (5) (65) (1) 10 (59) (85) 989 904 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 52 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET — ASSETS December 31, (Dollars in millions) Current assets 2018 2017 Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable $ Customers and agents, less allowances of $71 and $61, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, less allowances of $2 and $2, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 921 17 992 107 150 103 12 28 619 100 861 100 145 112 2 27 Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,330 1,966 Assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 10 Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,195 2,232 Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $168 and $142, respectively . . . . . Investments in unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment In service and under construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 509 253 480 12,074 8,728 3,346 509 279 453 11,742 8,318 3,424 Other assets and deferred charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 616 422 Total assets1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9,783 $ 9,295 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 53 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET — LIABILITIES AND EQUITY December 31, (Dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts) Current liabilities Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer deposits and deferred revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liabilities held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred liabilities and credits Deferred income tax liability, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other deferred liabilities and credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 2017 $ 21 365 197 11 44 127 114 879 1 640 541 20 368 223 11 64 126 106 918 — 552 495 Long-term debt, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,418 2,437 Commitments and contingencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncontrolling interests with redemption features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1 Equity TDS shareholders’ equity Series A Common and Common Shares Authorized 290 shares (25 Series A Common and 265 Common Shares) Issued 133 shares (7 Series A Common and 126 Common Shares) Outstanding 114 shares (7 Series A Common and 107 Common Shares) and 111 shares (7 Series A Common and 104 Common Shares), respectively Par Value ($.01 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital in excess of par value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury shares, at cost, 19 and 22 Common Shares, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total TDS shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2,432 (519) (10) 2,656 4,560 733 5,293 1 2,413 (669) (1) 2,525 4,269 623 4,892 Total liabilities and equity1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9,783 $ 9,295 1 The consolidated total assets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, include assets held by consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) of $848 million and $765 million, respectively, which are not available to be used to settle the obligations of TDS. The consolidated total liabilities as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, include certain liabilities of consolidated VIEs of $21 million for which the creditors of the VIEs have no recourse to the general credit of TDS. See Note 14 — Variable Interest Entities for additional information. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 54 y t i u q e l a t o T s t s e r e t n i y t i u q e g n i l l o r t n o c n o N ’ l s r e d o h e r a h s i d e n a t e R i s g n n r a e S D T l a t o T l d e t a u m u c c A r e h t o e v i s n e h e r p m o c ) s s o l ( e m o c n i y r u s a e r T s e r a h s n i f o l a t i p a C s s e c x e e u a v l r a p l s r e d o h e r a h S S D T 5 9 1 5 3 1 2 9 8 , 4 ) 8 ( 8 2 ) 2 7 ( 2 1 2 4 5 5 7 1 ) 3 ( 1 3 — 8 2 — — — — 4 5 — ) 3 ( 4 6 1 5 3 1 ) 8 ( — ) 2 7 ( 2 1 2 4 1 7 1 — 5 6 1 5 3 1 — — ) 2 7 ( ) 4 1 ( ) 3 8 ( — — — ) 1 ( — ) 8 ( — — — — — — — — — — — — 5 2 5 2 1 — — — — — — — — 1 — 1 7 1 — $ 3 2 6 $ 9 6 2 , 4 $ 5 2 5 , 2 $ ) 1 ( $ ) 9 6 6 ( $ 3 1 4 , 2 $ 1 — — — — — — — — — — A s e i r e S n o m m o C d n a n o m m o C s e r a h s $ . . . . . . . . . . 3 9 2 , 5 $ 3 3 7 $ 0 6 5 , 4 $ 6 5 6 , 2 $ ) 0 1 ( $ ) 9 1 5 ( $ 2 3 4 , 2 $ 1 $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r e p . 4 6 0 $ ( s d n e d v d i i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y t i u q e s s o l i e v s n e h e r p m o c r e h t O e r a h s n o m m o C A s e i r e S d n a n o m m o C S D T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ) e r a h s n a p l t n e m t s e v n e r i d n e d v D i i s n a p l n o i t a s n e p m o c d n a e v i t n e c n I d n a s e c n a u s s i , s e s a h c r u p e r r o f i s e i r a d s b u s i n i t n e m t s e v n i t s u d A j . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s n a p l n o i t a s n e p m o c r e h t o s d r a w a n o i t a s n e p m o c d e s a b - k c o S t s t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c n o n o t s n o i t u b i r t s D i . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D s a d e i f i s s a c l s t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c n o n l s r e d o h e r a h s S D T o t o t l e b a t u b i r t t a e m o c n i t e N l e b a t u b i r t t a e m o c n i t e N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D s e g n a h c g n i t n u o c c a f o t c e f f e l e v i t a u m u C ) s t n u o m a e r a h s r e p t p e c x e , s n o i l l i m n i s r a l l o D ( 55 . s t n e m e t a t s l i a c n a n i f d e t a d i l o s n o c e s e h t f o t r a p l a r g e t n i n a e r a s e t o n i g n y n a p m o c c a e h T I Y T U Q E N I S E G N A H C F O T N E M E T A T S D E T A D I L O S N O C . C N I , S M E T S Y S A T A D D N A E N O H P E L E T y t i u q e l a t o T g n i l l o r t n o c n o N s t s e r e t n i d e r r e f e r P s e r a h s S D T l a t o T ’ l s r e d o h e r a h s y t i u q e i d e n a t e R i s g n n r a e l d e t a u m u c c A r e h t o e v i s n e h e r p m o c ) s s o l ( e m o c n i y r u s a e r T s e r a h s n i f o l a t i p a C s s e c x e e u a v l r a p l s r e d o h e r a h S S D T 4 ) 2 ( ) 1 ( ) 9 6 ( 4 2 1 1 3 4 1 ) 4 ( 3 5 1 0 5 7 , 4 — 4 — — — — — 8 1 — ) 4 ( $ 5 0 6 $ 2 9 8 , 4 $ 3 2 6 $ 1 — — — ) 1 ( — — — — — — — $ 4 4 1 , 4 $ 4 5 4 , 2 3 5 1 ) 2 ( — ) 9 6 ( — 2 1 4 3 1 4 1 — 3 5 1 — — ) 9 6 ( ) 1 ( — ) 2 1 ( — — — $ 1 — ) 2 ( — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 1 6 1 — — — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 1 — $ ) 8 9 6 ( $ 6 8 3 , 2 $ 1 — — — — — — — — — — $ 9 6 2 , 4 $ 5 2 5 , 2 $ ) 1 ( $ ) 9 6 6 ( $ 3 1 4 , 2 $ 1 $ . s t n e m e t a t s l i a c n a n i f d e t a d i l o s n o c e s e h t f o t r a p l a r g e t n i n a e r a s e t o n i g n y n a p m o c c a e h T A s e i r e S n o m m o C d n a n o m m o C s e r a h s $ . . . . . . s t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c n o n l s r e d o h e r a h s S D T o t o t l e b a t u b i r t t a e m o c n i t e N l e b a t u b i r t t a e m o c n i t e N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D ) s t n u o m a e r a h s r e p t p e c x e , s n o i l l i m n i s r a l l o D ( , s e s a h c r u p e r r o f i s e i r a d s b u s i n i t n e m t s e v n i t s u d A j . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s n a p l n o i t a s n e p m o c r e h t o d n a s e c n a u s s i . . . . . . . . . . . s d r a w a n o i t a s n e p m o c d e s a b - k c o S t s t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c n o n o t s n o i t u b i r t s D i . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ) e r a h s r e p 2 6 . 0 $ ( s d n e d v d i i s e r a h s d e r r e f e r P f o n o i t p m e d e R . . . n a p l t n e m t s e v n e r i d n e d v D i i . s n a p l n o i t a s n e p m o c d n a e v i t n e c n I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y t i u q e s a d e i f i s s a c l . s s o l i e v s n e h e r p m o c r e h t O e r a h S n o m m o C A s e i r e S d n a n o m m o C S D T 56 I Y T U Q E N I S E G N A H C F O T N E M E T A T S D E T A D I L O S N O C . C N I , S M E T S Y S A T A D D N A E N O H P E L E T 0 5 7 , 4 $ 5 0 6 $ 1 $ 4 4 1 , 4 $ 4 5 4 , 2 $ 1 $ ) 8 9 6 ( $ 6 8 3 , 2 $ 1 $ . s t n e m e t a t s l i a c n a n i f d e t a d i l o s n o c e s e h t f o t r a p l a r g e t n i n a e r a s e t o n i g n y n a p m o c c a e h T y t i u q e l a t o T g n i l l o r t n o c n o N s t s e r e t n i d e r r e f e r P s e r a h s S D T l a t o T ’ l s r e d o h e r a h s y t i u q e i d e n a t e R i s g n n r a e l d e t a u m u c c A r e h t o e v i s n e h e r p m o c e m o c n i y r u s a e r T s e r a h s n i f o l a t i p a C s s e c x e e u a v l r a p 9 1 ) 3 ( ) 5 6 ( 9 9 7 2 6 1 1 ) 1 ( 3 4 4 0 7 , 4 — 9 — — — — — 0 2 — — ) 1 ( $ 7 7 5 $ 1 — — — — — — — — — — — 3 4 1 — ) 3 ( ) 5 6 ( 9 9 7 6 1 1 — 3 4 — — ) 5 6 ( — — ) 1 1 ( — — — — $ 6 2 1 , 4 $ 7 8 4 , 2 $ — — 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — ) 3 ( — 7 5 2 — — — — — — — — — 2 ) 5 ( 7 6 1 1 — $ ) 7 2 7 ( $ 5 6 3 , 2 $ 1 — — — — — — — — — — — l s r e d o h e r a h S S D T A s e i r e S n o m m o C d n a n o m m o C s e r a h s $ . . . . . . s t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c n o n l s r e d o h e r a h s S D T o t o t l e b a t u b i r t t a e m o c n i t e N l e b a t u b i r t t a e m o c n i t e N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D ) s t n u o m a e r a h s r e p t p e c x e , s n o i l l i m n i s r a l l o D ( , s e s a h c r u p e r r o f i s e i r a d s b u s i n i t n e m t s e v n i t s u d A j . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s n a p l n o i t a s n e p m o c r e h t o d n a s e c n a u s s i . . . . . . . . . . . s d r a w a n o i t a s n e p m o c d e s a b - k c o S t s d r a w a k c o t s m o r f ) l l a f t r o h s ( l l f a d n w i x a T . . s t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c n o n o t s n o i t u b i r t s D i . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ) e r a h s r e p 9 5 . 0 $ ( s d n e d v d i i s e r a h S n o m m o C f o e s a h c r u p e R . . . n a p l t n e m t s e v n e r i d n e d v D i i . s n a p l n o i t a s n e p m o c d n a e v i t n e c n I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y t i u q e s a d e i f i s s a c l e m o c n i i e v s n e h e r p m o c r e h t O e r a h S n o m m o C A s e i r e S d n a n o m m o C S D T 57 I Y T U Q E N I S E G N A H C F O T N E M E T A T S D E T A D I L O S N O C . C N I , S M E T S Y S A T A D D N A E N O H P E L E T TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS Nature of Operations Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (TDS) is a diversified telecommunications company providing high-quality communications services to customers with 5.0 million wireless connections and 1.2 million wireline and cable connections at December 31, 2018. TDS conducts all of its wireless operations through its 82%-owned subsidiary, United States Cellular Corporation (U.S. Cellular). TDS provides wireline and cable services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, TDS Telecommunications LLC (TDS Telecom). TDS has the following reportable segments: U.S. Cellular, Wireline, and Cable. TDS’ non-reportable other business activities are presented as ‘‘Corporate, Eliminations and Other’’, which includes the operations of TDS’ wholly-owned hosted and managed services (HMS) subsidiary, which operates under the OneNeck IT Solutions brand, and its wholly- owned printing subsidiary Suttle-Straus, Inc. (Suttle-Straus). HMS’ and Suttle-Straus’ financial results were not significant to TDS’ operations. All of TDS’ segments operate only in the United States, except for HMS, which includes an insignificant foreign operation. See Note 18 — Business Segment Information for summary financial information on each business segment. Change in Reportable Segments TDS re-evaluated internal reporting roles with regard to its HMS business unit and, as a result, changed its reportable segments. Effective January 1, 2018, HMS was considered a non-reportable segment and is no longer being reported under TDS Telecom. This change enables TDS Telecom to continue to successfully execute on the Wireline and Cable segments’ shared strategy to be the preferred service provider in its markets. Additionally, this change allows HMS to leverage TDS’ corporate IT resources, to improve operations and customer service, and better position itself for growth. Prior periods have been recast to conform to this revised presentation. See Note 18 — Business Segment Information for additional information on TDS’ reportable segments. Principles of Consolidation The accounting policies of TDS conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) as set forth in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC). Unless otherwise specified, references to accounting provisions and GAAP in these notes refer to the requirements of the FASB ASC. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TDS and subsidiaries in which it has a controlling financial interest, including U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom. In addition, the consolidated financial statements include certain entities in which TDS has a variable interest that requires consolidation under GAAP. See Note 14 — Variable Interest Entities for additional information relating to TDS’ VIEs. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Use of Estimates The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (a) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and (b) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates are involved in accounting for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, income taxes and equipment installment plans. 58 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash Cash and cash equivalents include cash and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents subject to contractual restrictions are classified as restricted cash. The following table provides a reconciliation of Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet to the total of the amounts in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. December 31, (Dollars in millions) Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted cash included in Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in the statement of cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 2018 921 6 927 $ $ 2017 619 3 622 Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts U.S. Cellular’s accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts owed by customers for wireless services and equipment sales, including sales of certain devices and accessories under installment plans, by agents for sales of equipment to them and by other wireless carriers whose customers have used U.S. Cellular’s wireless systems. TDS Telecom’s accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts owed by customers for services and products provided, by state and federal governments for grants and support funds including Alternative Connect America Cost Model (A-CAM), and by interexchange carriers for long-distance traffic, which TDS Telecom carries on its network. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses related to existing billed and unbilled accounts receivable. The allowance is estimated based on historical experience, account aging and other factors that could affect collectability. Accounts receivable balances are reviewed on either an aggregate or individual basis for collectability depending on the type of receivable. When it is probable that an account balance will not be collected, the account balance is charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts. TDS does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to its customers. Inventory Inventory consists primarily of wireless devices stated at the lower of cost, which approximates cost determined on the first-in first-out basis, or net realizable value. Net realizable value is determined by reference to the stand-alone selling price. Licenses Licenses consist of direct and incremental costs incurred in acquiring Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses to provide wireless service. TDS has determined that wireless licenses are indefinite-lived intangible assets and, therefore, not subject to amortization based on the following factors: (cid:2) Radio spectrum is not a depleting asset. (cid:2) The ability to use radio spectrum is not limited to any one technology. (cid:2) TDS and its consolidated subsidiaries are licensed to use radio spectrum through the FCC licensing process, which enables licensees to utilize specified portions of the spectrum for the provision of wireless service. (cid:2) TDS and its consolidated subsidiaries are required to renew their FCC licenses every ten years or, in some cases, every twelve or fifteen years. To date, all of TDS’ license renewal applications have been granted by the FCC. Generally, license renewal applications filed by licensees otherwise in compliance with FCC regulations are routinely granted. If, however, a license renewal application is challenged either by a competing applicant for the license or by a petition to deny the renewal application, the license will be renewed if the licensee can demonstrate its entitlement to a ‘‘renewal expectancy.’’ Licensees are entitled to such an expectancy if they can demonstrate to the FCC that they have provided ‘‘substantial service’’ during their license term and have ‘‘substantially complied’’ with FCC rules and policies. TDS believes that it is probable that its future license renewal applications will be granted. 59 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS U.S. Cellular performs its annual impairment assessment of Licenses as of November 1 of each year or more frequently if there are events or circumstances that cause U.S. Cellular to believe the carrying value of Licenses exceeds their fair value on a more likely than not basis. For purposes of its impairment testing of Licenses, U.S. Cellular separated its FCC licenses into eight units of accounting. The eight units of accounting consisted of one unit of accounting for developed operating market licenses (built licenses) and seven geographic non-operating market licenses (unbuilt licenses). U.S. Cellular performed a qualitative impairment assessment in 2018 and a quantitative impairment assessment in 2017 to determine whether the licenses were impaired. Based on the impairment assessments performed, U.S. Cellular did not have an impairment of its Licenses in 2018 or 2017. See Note 7 — Intangible Assets for additional details related to Licenses. Goodwill TDS has Goodwill as a result of its acquisition of wireline and cable companies. TDS performs its annual impairment assessment of Goodwill as of November 1 of each year or more frequently if there are events or circumstances that cause TDS to believe the carrying value of individual reporting units exceeds their respective fair values on a more likely than not basis. Goodwill impairment loss will be measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. For purposes of conducting its Goodwill impairment tests, TDS Telecom identified two reporting units: Wireline and Cable. The discounted cash flow approach and guideline public company method were used to value the Wireline and Cable reporting units for the annual impairment tests. Based on the annual impairment assessments performed, Wireline and Cable did not have an impairment of their Goodwill in 2018 or 2017. In 2017, TDS recorded goodwill impairments related to its U.S. Cellular and HMS reporting units, which reduced the carrying value of their respective Goodwill to zero. See Note 7 — Intangible Assets for additional details related to Goodwill. Franchise Rights TDS Telecom has franchise rights as a result of acquisitions of cable businesses. Franchise rights are intangible assets that provide their holder with the right to operate a business in a certain geographical location as sanctioned by the franchiser, usually a government agency. Franchise rights are generally granted for ten year periods and may be renewed for additional terms upon approval by the granting authority. TDS anticipates that future renewals of its franchise rights will be granted. Effective January 1, 2018, TDS prospectively changed its estimated useful life for franchise rights from indefinite-lived to 15 years, due primarily to the effects of increasing competition and advancements in technology for delivering and consuming video programming. Commensurate with this change, TDS reviewed its franchise rights for impairment, and noted there was no impairment as of January 1, 2018. As a result, Depreciation, amortization and accretion increased $17 million, calculated on a straight-line basis, and Net income decreased $13 million or $0.11 per share (Basic and Diluted) for the year ended December 31, 2018. TDS reviews franchise rights for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. TDS re-evaluates the useful life of franchise rights each year to determine if changes in technology or other business changes would warrant a revision of its remaining useful life. See Note 7 — Intangible Assets for additional details related to franchise rights. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities For its equity method investments for which financial information is readily available, TDS records its equity in the earnings of the entity in the current period. For its equity method investments for which financial information is not readily available, TDS records its equity in the earnings of the entity on a one quarter lag basis. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment is stated at the original cost of construction or purchase including capitalized costs of certain taxes, payroll-related expenses, interest and estimated costs to remove the assets. Expenditures that enhance the productive capacity of assets in service or extend their useful lives are capitalized and depreciated. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs of assets in service are charged to Cost of services or Selling, 60 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS general and administrative expense, as applicable. Retirements and disposals of assets are recorded by removing the original cost of the asset (along with the related accumulated depreciation) from plant in service and charging it, together with net removal costs (removal costs less an applicable accrued asset retirement obligation and salvage value realized), to (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net. Certain Wireline segment assets use the group depreciation method. Accordingly, when a group method asset is retired in the ordinary course of business, the original cost of the asset and accumulated depreciation in the same amount are removed, with no gain or loss recognized on the disposition. TDS capitalizes certain costs of developing new information systems. Software licenses that qualify for capitalization as an asset are accounted for as the acquisition of an intangible asset and the incurrence of a liability to the extent that the license fees are not fully paid at acquisition. Depreciation and Amortization Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related asset, except for certain Wireline segment assets, which use the group depreciation method. The group depreciation method develops a depreciation rate based on the average useful life of a specific group of assets, rather than each asset individually. TDS depreciates leasehold improvement assets associated with leased properties over periods ranging from one to thirty years; such periods approximate the shorter of the assets’ economic lives or the specific lease terms. Useful lives of specific assets are reviewed throughout the year to determine if changes in technology or other business changes would warrant accelerating the depreciation of those specific assets. There were no material changes to useful lives of property, plant and equipment in 2018, 2017 or 2016. See Note 9 — Property, Plant and Equipment for additional details related to useful lives. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets TDS reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. U.S. Cellular has one asset group for purposes of assessing property, plant and equipment for impairment based on the fact that the individual operating markets are reliant on centrally operated data centers, mobile telephone switching offices and a network operations center. U.S. Cellular operates a single integrated national wireless network. The cash flows generated by this single interdependent network represent the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. TDS Telecom has two asset groups of Wireline and Cable for purposes of assessing property, plant and equipment for impairment based on their integrated network, assets and operations. The cash flows generated by each of these groups is the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. Agent Liabilities U.S. Cellular has relationships with agents, which are independent businesses that obtain customers for U.S. Cellular. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, U.S. Cellular had accrued $59 million and $61 million, respectively, for amounts due to agents. These amounts are included in Other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Debt Issuance Costs Debt issuance costs include underwriters’ and legal fees and other charges related to issuing various borrowing instruments and other long - term agreements, and are amortized over the respective term of each instrument. Debt issuance costs related to TDS’ and U.S. Cellular’s revolving credit agreements and U.S. Cellular’s receivables securitization agreement are recorded in Other assets and deferred charges in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. All other debt issuance costs are presented as an offset to the related debt obligation in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Asset Retirement Obligations TDS accounts for asset retirement obligations by recording the fair value of a liability for legal obligations associated with an asset retirement in the period in which the obligations are incurred. At the time the liability is incurred, TDS records a liability equal to the net present value of the estimated cost of the asset retirement obligation and increases the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset by an equal amount. Until the obligation is fulfilled, TDS updates its estimates relating to cash flows required and timing of settlement. TDS records the present value of the changes in the future 61 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS value as an increase or decrease to the liability and the related carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to future value over a period ending with the estimated settlement date of the respective asset retirement obligation. The carrying amount of the long-lived asset is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the obligation, any difference between the cost to retire the asset and the recorded liability is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note 10 — Asset Retirement Obligations for additional information. Treasury Shares Common Shares repurchased by TDS are recorded at cost as treasury shares and result in a reduction of equity. When treasury shares are reissued, TDS determines the cost using the first-in, first-out cost method. The difference between the cost of the treasury shares and reissuance price is included in Capital in excess of par value or Retained earnings. Revenue Recognition Revenues from sales of equipment and products are recognized when control has transferred to the customer. Service revenues are recognized as the related service is provided. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition for additional information on TDS’ policies related to Revenues. Advertising Costs TDS expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs totaled $230 million, $228 million and $263 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Income Taxes TDS files a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred taxes are computed using the liability method, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for future deductible temporary differences and operating loss carryforwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for future taxable temporary differences. Both deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates in effect when the temporary differences are expected to reverse. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. TDS evaluates income tax uncertainties, assesses the probability of the ultimate settlement with the applicable taxing authority and records an amount based on that assessment. Deferred taxes are reported as a net non-current asset or liability by jurisdiction. Any corresponding valuation allowance to reduce the amount of deferred tax assets is also recorded as non-current. See Note 5 — Income Taxes for additional information. Stock-Based Compensation and Other Plans TDS has established long-term incentive plans, dividend reinvestment plans, and a non-employee director compensation plan. The dividend reinvestment plan of TDS is not considered a compensatory plan and, therefore, recognition of compensation costs for grants made under this plan is not required. All other plans are considered compensatory plans; therefore, recognition of costs for grants made under these plans is required. TDS recognizes stock compensation expense based upon the fair value of the specific awards granted using established valuation methodologies. The amount of stock compensation cost recognized on either a straight-line basis or graded attribution method is based on the portion of the award that is expected to vest over the requisite service period, which generally represents the vesting period. Stock-based compensation cost recognized has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. See Note 17 — Stock-Based Compensation for additional information. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In March 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-07, Compensation — Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires TDS to report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net periodic benefit cost must be presented separately from the service cost component and outside of Operating income in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The new accounting standard also specifies that only the service cost component of net benefit cost is eligible for capitalization. TDS adopted ASU 2017-07 retrospectively on January 1, 62 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2018, and prior periods have been recast to reflect ASU 2017-07. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2017-07, Selling, general and administrative expenses in 2017 and 2016 increased by $3 million from previously reported amounts, with a corresponding increase in Other, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. This change did not have an impact on Income before income taxes, Net income, or Earnings per share in 2017 or 2016, nor did it have a cumulative impact to Retained earnings as of the date presented. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, Leases (ASU 2016-02) and has since amended the standard with Accounting Standards Update 2018-01, Leases: Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842, Accounting Standards Update 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases, Accounting Standards Update 2018-11, Leases: Targeted Improvements, and Accounting Standards Update 2018-20, Leases: Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors. ASU 2016-02, as amended, requires lessees to record a right-of-use asset and lease liability for almost all leases. This ASU does not substantially impact the lessor accounting model. However, some changes to the lessor accounting guidance were made to align with lessee accounting changes within ASC 842, Leases and certain key aspects of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. TDS will adopt ASU 2016-02, as amended, using a modified retrospective method on January 1, 2019. Under this method, a cumulative effect adjustment is recognized upon adoption and the guidance is applied prospectively. TDS elected transitional practical expedients for existing leases which eliminated the requirements to reassess existing lease classification and initial direct costs, and whether contracts contain leases. TDS also elected the practical expedient related to land easements that allows it to carry forward the accounting treatment for pre-existing land easement agreements. TDS has implemented new systems, processes and controls to adopt ASU 2016-02, as amended, and has implemented a new lease management and accounting system to assist in the application of the new standard. Nearly all of TDS’ leases are classified as operating leases, although it does have a small number of finance leases. The adoption of ASU 2016-02, as amended, will add approximately $1.0 billion in right-of-use assets and approximately $1.1 billion in lease liabilities to the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 1, 2019, with the difference primarily representing accrued rent recognized prior to adoption. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 is not expected to have a material impact on TDS’ results of operations in 2019. In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (ASU 2016-13). ASU 2016-13 requires entities to use a new forward-looking, expected loss model to estimate credit losses. It also requires additional disclosure relating to the credit quality of trade and other receivables, including information relating to management’s estimate of credit allowances. TDS is required to adopt ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, using the modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted as of January 1, 2019; however, TDS does not intend to adopt early. TDS is evaluating the effects that adoption of ASU 2016-13 will have on its financial position, results of operations and disclosures. In June 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-07, Compensation — Stock Compensation: Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2018-07). ASU 2018-07 expands the scope of ASC 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation, which currently only includes share-based payments issued to employees, to also include share-based payments issued to nonemployees for goods and services. TDS is required to adopt ASU 2018-07 on January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2018-07 will not have an impact on TDS’ financial position or results of operations. In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-14, Compensation — Retirement Benefits — Defined Benefit Plans — General: Disclosure Framework — Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans (ASU 2018-14). ASU 2018-14 modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The amendments in ASU 2018-14 were developed as part of the FASB’s broader disclosure framework project, which aims to improve the effectiveness of disclosure requirements. TDS is required to adopt ASU 2018-14 retrospectively on January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2018-14 will not impact TDS’ financial position or results of operations. TDS is evaluating the effects that adoption of ASU 2018-14 will have on its disclosures. In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-15, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other — Internal-Use Software: Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (ASU 2018-15). ASU 2018-15 aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the existing guidance for capitalizing implementation costs for an arrangement that has a software license. The service element of a hosting arrangement will continue to be expensed as 63 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS incurred. Any capitalized implementation costs will be amortized over the period of the service contract. TDS is required to adopt ASU 2018-15 on January 1, 2020, either retrospectively or prospectively to eligible costs incurred on or after the date that this guidance is first applied. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2018-15 is not expected to have a significant impact on TDS’ financial position or results of operations. NOTE 2 REVENUE RECOGNITION Change in Accounting Policy In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers and has since amended the standard with Accounting Standards Update 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date, Accounting Standards Update 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), Accounting Standards Update 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, Accounting Standards Update 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, and Accounting Standards Update 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, collectively referred to hereinafter as ASU 2014-09. These standards replace existing revenue recognition rules with a single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. In February 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-05, Other Income — Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets: Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets (ASU 2017-05). ASU 2017-05 clarifies how entities account for the derecognition of a nonfinancial asset and adds guidance for partial sales of nonfinancial assets. TDS adopted the provisions of ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2017-05 and applied them to all contracts as of January 1, 2018, using a modified retrospective method. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented, recognizing the cumulative effect of the accounting change as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings. Accordingly, prior periods have not been recast to reflect the new accounting standard. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of ASU 2014-09 resulted in an increase of $164 million in retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. ASU 2017-05 had no impact to retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. As a practical expedient, TDS groups similar contracts or similar performance obligations together into portfolios of contracts or performance obligations if doing so does not result in a significant difference from applying the new accounting standard to the individual contracts. TDS applies this grouping method for the following types of transactions: device activation fees, contract acquisition costs, contract fulfillment costs, and certain customer promotions. Contract portfolios will be recognized over the respective expected customer lives or terms of the contracts. 64 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The line items impacted by the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2017-05 in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and the Consolidated Balance Sheet are presented below. Consolidated Statement of Operations Year Ended December 31, 2018 (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) Operating revenues Results under prior accounting standards Adjustment As reported Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment and product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of equipment and products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to TDS shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income available to TDS common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings per share available to TDS common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per share available to TDS common shareholders . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ 4,108 1,014 5,122 1,129 1,697 (17) 4,907 215 231 48 183 42 141 141 1.25 1.22 $ $ $ (109) 96 (13) 1 (3) (1) (3) (10) (10) (2) (8) (2) (6) (6) (0.05) (0.05) $ $ $ 3,999 1,110 5,109 1,130 1,694 (18) 4,904 205 221 46 175 40 135 135 1.20 1.17 Numbers may not foot due to rounding. The decrease in Service revenues and the increase in Equipment and product sales revenues are driven primarily by differences in the timing and classification of revenue recognized for certain arrangements with multiple performance obligations and ceasing to record deferred imputed interest and the resulting interest income on equipment installment contracts. Under prior accounting standards, revenues were allocated to deliverables using the relative selling price method, where consideration was allocated to each element on the basis of its relative selling price. Revenue recognized for the delivered items was limited to the amount due from the customer that was not contingent upon the delivery of additional products or services. Under ASU 2014-09, the revenue allocation of the transaction price is based on the relative standalone selling prices of the individual performance obligations in the customer’s contract, and the resulting revenue attributable to each is recognized as control over the performance obligation is transferred to the customer. This has resulted in increased Equipment and product sales revenues as more revenue is allocated to discounted equipment than under prior accounting standards. Under prior accounting standards, TDS deferred imputed interest related to equipment installment plan receivable contracts that exceeded twelve months, and recognized the corresponding interest income over the contract period in Service revenues. Under the provisions of ASU 2014-09, TDS has determined that equipment installment plan contracts do not contain a significant financing component, and accordingly, TDS ceased recording deferred imputed interest and the resulting interest income on equipment installment contracts upon the adoption of ASU 2014-09. Cost of equipment and products increased due to a change in timing of recognition of cost of goods sold in the agent channel. Under prior accounting standards, Equipment and product sales to agents and the related Cost of equipment and products were recognized when equipment was sold through from the agent to end user customers. In accordance with the provisions of ASU 2014-09, such amounts are recognized when TDS delivers the equipment to the agent. Fluctuations in Selling, general and administrative expenses are due to the capitalization and amortization of contract acquisition and contract fulfillment costs under ASU 2014-09. Under ASU 2017-05, (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net is calculated by subtracting the carrying amount of the distinct asset being disposed from the consideration measured and allocated to that distinct asset. With respect to license exchange transactions, the consideration, or transaction price, is the fair value of the licenses received. Under prior accounting standards, the transaction price was typically the fair value of the licenses surrendered. 65 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated Balance Sheet As of December 31, 2018 (Dollars in millions) Accounts receivable Customers and agents, less allowances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investments in unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets and deferred charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer deposits and deferred revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income tax liability, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other deferred liabilities and credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total TDS shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities and equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Numbers may not foot due to rounding. Results under prior accounting standards Adjustment As reported $ $ 928 128 24 2,286 2,194 463 435 9,540 218 110 895 583 526 2,499 4,403 704 5,107 9,540 $ $ 64 (25) 4 44 1 17 181 243 (21) 4 (16) 57 15 157 157 29 186 243 $ $ 992 103 28 2,330 2,195 480 616 9,783 197 114 879 640 541 2,656 4,560 733 5,293 9,783 As a result of adoption of ASU 2014-09, TDS recorded short-term and long-term contract assets and contract liabilities in its Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018. Under ASU 2014-09, the timing of recognition of revenue for each performance obligation may differ from the timing of the customer billing, creating a contract asset or contract liability. See Contract Balances below for additional information. Contract assets are included in Other current assets if short-term in nature or Other assets and deferred charges if long-term in nature. Short-term contract liabilities are classified as Customer deposits and deferred revenues and long-term contract liabilities are included in Other deferred liabilities and credits. Accounts receivable increased as a result of TDS ceasing to record deferred imputed interest. Certain prepaid expenses decreased due to a change in timing of recognition of sales of equipment to agents. Investments in unconsolidated entities increased due to the cumulative effect of applying the provisions of ASU 2014-09 to certain of TDS’ equity method investments as of January 1, 2018. Deferred income tax liabilities, net, increased due to the provisions of ASU 2014-09 increasing the net basis of assets on a U.S. GAAP basis, without a corresponding increase in tax basis. Contract cost assets have also been created as a result of ASU 2014-09 due to capitalization of fulfillment costs and costs to obtain a new contract. See Contract Cost Assets below for additional information. 66 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Nature of goods and services The following is a description of principal activities from which TDS generates its revenues. Services and products Nature, timing of satisfaction of performance obligations, and significant payment terms Wireless services Wireless devices and accessories Wireless service includes voice, messaging and data services. Revenue is recognized in Service revenues as wireless service is provided to the customer. Wireless services generally are billed and paid in advance on a monthly basis. U.S. Cellular offers a comprehensive range of wireless devices such as handsets, tablets, mobile hotspots, home phones and routers for use by its customers, as well as accessories. U.S. Cellular also sells wireless devices to agents and other third-party distributors for resale. U.S. Cellular frequently discounts wireless devices sold to new and current customers. U.S. Cellular also offers customers the option to purchase certain devices and accessories under installment contracts over a specified time period. For certain equipment installment plans, after a specified period of time, the customer may have the right to upgrade to a new device. Such upgrades require the customer to enter into an equipment installment contract for the new device, and transfer the existing device to U.S. Cellular. U.S. Cellular recognizes revenue in Equipment and product sales revenues when control of the device or accessory is transferred to the customer, which is generally upon delivery. Wireless roaming U.S. Cellular receives roaming revenues when other wireless carriers’ customers use U.S. Cellular’s wireless systems. U.S. Cellular recognizes revenue in Service revenues when the roaming service is provided to the other carrier’s customer. Wireless Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) Revenues Wireless tower rents Activation fees Wireline services Wireline wholesale revenues Cable services IT hardware sales Hosted and managed services Significant Judgments Telecommunications companies may be designated by states, or in some cases by the FCC, as an ETC to receive support payments from the Universal Service Fund if they provide specified services in ‘‘high cost’’ areas. ETC revenues recognized in the reporting period represent the amounts which U.S. Cellular is entitled to receive for such period, as determined and approved in connection with U.S. Cellular’s designation as an ETC in various states. U.S. Cellular receives tower rental revenues when another carrier leases tower space on a U.S. Cellular owned tower. U.S. Cellular recognizes revenue in Service revenues in the period during which the services are provided. TDS charges its end customers activation fees in connection with the sale of certain services and equipment. Activation fees are deferred and recognized over the period benefitted. Wireline services include broadband, video and voice services. Revenue is recognized in Service revenues as service is provided to the customer. Wireline services are generally billed and paid in advance on a monthly basis. Wholesale revenues include network access services primarily to interexchange and wireless carriers for carrying data and voice traffic on TDS Telecom’s network, special access services and state and federal support payments, including A-CAM. Wholesale revenues are recorded as the related service is provided. Cable services include broadband, video and voice services. Revenue is recognized in Service revenues as service is provided to the customer. Cable services are generally billed and paid in advance on a monthly basis. TDS recognizes equipment revenue when it no longer has any requirements to perform, when title has passed and when the products are accepted by the customer. HMS Service revenues consist of cloud and hosting solutions, managed services, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) application management, colocation services, and IT hardware related maintenance and professional services. Revenues related to these services are recognized as services are provided. Revenues from sales of equipment and products are recognized when control has transferred to the customer. Service revenues are recognized as the related service is provided. Services are deemed to be highly interrelated when the method and timing of transfer and performance risk are the same. Highly interrelated services that are determined to not be distinct have been grouped into a single performance obligation. Each month of services promised is a performance obligation. The series of monthly service performance obligations promised over the course of the contract are combined into a single performance obligation for purposes of the allocation. 67 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TDS has made judgments regarding transaction price, including but not limited to issues relating to variable consideration, time value of money and returns. When determined to be significant in the context of the contract, these items are considered in the valuation of transaction price at contract inception or modification, as appropriate. Multiple Performance Obligations U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom sell bundled service and equipment offerings. In these instances, TDS recognizes its revenue based on the relative standalone selling prices for each distinct service or equipment performance obligation, or bundles thereof. TDS estimates the standalone selling price of the device or accessory to be its retail price excluding discounts. TDS estimates the standalone selling price of wireless service to be the price offered to customers on month-to-month contracts. Equipment Installment Plans U.S. Cellular equipment revenue under equipment installment plan contracts is recognized at the time the device is delivered to the customer for the amount allocated to the equipment under ASU 2014-09. Incentives Discounts and incentives that are deemed cash are recognized as a reduction of Operating revenues concurrently with the associated revenue. U.S. Cellular issues rebates to its agents and end customers. These incentives are recognized as a reduction to revenue at the time the corresponding revenue is recognized. The total potential rebates and incentives are reduced by U.S. Cellular’s estimate of rebates that will not be redeemed by customers based on historical experience of such redemptions. From time to time, U.S. Cellular may offer certain promotions to incentivize customers to switch to, or to purchase additional services from, U.S. Cellular. Under these types of promotions, an eligible customer may receive an incentive in the form of a discount off additional services purchased shown as a rebate or credit to the customer’s monthly bill. U.S. Cellular accounts for the future discounts as material rights at the time of the initial transaction by allocating and deferring a portion of service and equipment revenue based on the relative proportion of the future discounts in comparison to the aggregate initial purchase. The deferred revenue will be recognized as service revenue in future periods. Amounts Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities TDS records amounts collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities on a net basis within a tax liability account if the tax is assessed upon the customer and TDS merely acts as an agent in collecting the tax on behalf of the imposing governmental authority. If the tax is assessed upon TDS, then amounts collected from customers as recovery of the tax are recorded in Service revenues and amounts remitted to governmental authorities are recorded in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The amounts recorded gross in revenues that are billed to customers and remitted to governmental authorities totaled $90 million, $80 million and $85 million for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Disaggregation of Revenue In the following table, revenue is disaggregated by type of service and timing of revenue recognition. Service revenues are recognized over time and Equipment sales are point in time. 68 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Year Ended December 31, 2018 Cellular Wireline Cable Total and Other Total TDS Telecom U.S. TDS Corporate, Telecom Eliminations (Dollars in millions) Revenues from contracts with customers: Type of service: Retail service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inbound roaming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wholesale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Service revenues from contracts with customers . . . . . . . . Equipment and product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,623 154 – – – 135 2,912 989 $ – – 321 184 191 – 696 2 $ – – 188 42 – – 230 – $ – – 509 226 191 (1) 925 2 $ – – – – – 72 72 119 $ 2,623 154 509 226 191 206 3,909 1,110 Total revenues from contracts with customers1 . . . . . $ 3,901 $ 698 $ 230 $ 927 $ 191 $ 5,019 Numbers may not foot due to rounding. 1 These amounts do not include revenues outside the scope of ASU 2014-09; therefore, revenue line items in this table will not agree to amounts presented in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Contract Balances For contracts that involve multiple element service and equipment offerings, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. When payment is collected in advance of delivery of goods or services, a contract liability is recorded. A contract asset is recorded when revenue is recognized in advance of TDS’ right to receive consideration. Once there is an unconditional right to receive the consideration, TDS bills the customer under the terms of the respective contract and the amounts are recorded as receivables. TDS recognizes Equipment and product sales revenue when the equipment is delivered to the customer and a corresponding contract asset or liability is recorded for the difference between the amount of revenue recognized and the amount billed to the customer in cases where discounts are offered. The contract asset or liability is reduced over the contract term as service is provided and billed to the customer. The accounts receivable balance related to amounts billed and not paid on contracts with customers, net of allowances, is shown in the table below. Bad debts expense recognized for the year ended December 31, 2018, related to receivables was $100 million. (Dollars in millions) Accounts receivable Customer and agents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 31, 2018 $ $ 987 73 1,060 1 These amounts do not include accounts receivable related to revenues outside the scope of ASU 2014-09; therefore, accounts receivable line items presented in this table will not agree to amounts presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. 69 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following table provides a rollforward of contract assets from contracts with customers, which are recorded in Other current assets and Other assets and deferred charges in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Contract Assets (Dollars in millions) Balance at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in accounting policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contract additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terminated contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reclassified to receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Balance at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ – 28 24 (1) (40) 11 The following table provides a rollforward of contract liabilities from contracts with customers, which are recorded in Customer deposits and deferred revenues and Other deferred liabilities and credits in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Contract Liabilities (Dollars in millions) Balance at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in accounting policy — Deferred revenues reclassification1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in accounting policy — Retained earnings impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contract additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terminated contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Revenue recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Balance at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ – 209 (22) 190 (2) (172) 203 1 This amount represents TDS’ obligation to transfer goods or services to customers for which it had received payment and classified as deferred revenue at December 31, 2017. Transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations The following table includes estimated service revenue expected to be recognized in the future related to performance obligations that are unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) at the end of the reporting period. The estimates represent service revenue to be recognized when services are delivered to customers pursuant to service plan contracts. These estimates are based on contracts in place as of December 31, 2018, and may vary from actual results due to future contract modifications. As a practical expedient, revenue related to contracts of less than one year, generally month-to-month contracts, are excluded from these estimates. (Dollars in millions) 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter $ Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 411 128 72 611 Service Revenue TDS has certain contracts at U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom in which it bills an amount equal to a fixed per-unit price multiplied by a variable quantity (e.g., roaming agreements with other carriers). Because TDS invoices for such items in an amount that corresponds directly with the value of the performance completed to date, TDS may recognize revenue in that amount. As a practical expedient, these contracts are excluded from the estimate of future revenues expected to be recognized related to performance obligations that are unsatisfied as of the end of a reporting period. 70 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Contract Cost Assets TDS expects that incremental commission fees paid as a result of obtaining contracts are recoverable and therefore TDS capitalizes these costs. As a practical expedient, costs with an amortization period of one year or less are not capitalized. TDS also incurs fulfillment costs, such as installation costs, where there is an expectation that a future benefit will be realized. Capitalized commission fees and fulfillment costs are amortized based on the transfer of the goods or services to which the assets relate, typically the contract term which ranges from fourteen months to five years. Contract cost asset balances, which are recorded in Other assets and deferred charges in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, were as follows: December 31, 2018 (Dollars in millions) Costs to obtain contracts Sales commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Fulfillment costs Installation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total contract cost assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 154 10 164 Amortization of contract cost assets was $124 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, and was included in Selling, general and administrative expense. There was no impairment loss recognized for the year ended December 31, 2018, related to contract cost assets. NOTE 3 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, TDS did not have any material financial or nonfinancial assets or liabilities that were required to be recorded at fair value in its Consolidated Balance Sheet in accordance with GAAP. The provisions of GAAP establish a fair value hierarchy that contains three levels for inputs used in fair value measurements. Level 1 inputs include quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted market prices for identical assets and liabilities in inactive markets. Level 3 inputs are unobservable. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is not representative of its expected performance or its overall risk profile and, therefore, Level 3 assets are not necessarily higher risk than Level 2 assets or Level 1 assets. TDS has applied the provisions of fair value accounting for purposes of computing the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes as displayed below. Level within the Fair Value Hierarchy December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Book Value Fair Value Book Value Fair Value (Dollars in millions) Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt Retail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Institutional . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 2 2 2 $ $ 921 17 $ 921 17 $ 619 100 1,753 534 182 1,596 531 182 1,753 534 194 619 100 1,783 522 194 The fair values of Cash and cash equivalents and Short-term investments approximate their book values due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. Long-term debt excludes capital lease obligations, other installment arrangements, the current portion of Long-term debt and debt financing costs. The fair value of ‘‘Retail’’ Long-term debt was estimated using market prices for TDS’ 7.0% Senior Notes, 6.875% Senior Notes, 6.625% Senior Notes and 5.875% Senior Notes, and U.S. Cellular’s 7.25% 2063 Senior Notes, 7.25% 2064 Senior Notes and 6.95% Senior Notes. TDS’ ‘‘Institutional’’ debt consists of U.S. Cellular’s 6.7% Senior Notes which are traded over the counter. TDS’ ‘‘Other’’ debt consists of a senior term loan credit agreement and other borrowings with financial institutions. TDS estimated the fair 71 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS value of its Institutional and Other debt through a discounted cash flow analysis using the interest rates or estimated yield to maturity for each borrowing, which ranged from 5.03% to 8.00% and 4.74% to 7.13% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. NOTE 4 EQUIPMENT INSTALLMENT PLANS TDS sells devices to customers under equipment installment plans over a specified time period. For certain equipment installment plans, after a specified period of time or amount of payments, the customer may have the right to upgrade to a new device and have the remaining unpaid equipment installment contract balance waived, subject to certain conditions, including trading in the original device in good working condition and signing a new equipment installment contract. TDS values this trade-in right as a guarantee liability. The guarantee liability is initially measured at fair value and is determined based on assumptions including the probability and timing of the customer upgrading to a new device and the fair value of the device being traded-in at the time of trade-in. When a customer exercises the trade-in option, both the outstanding receivable and guarantee liability balances related to the respective device are reduced to zero, and the value of the used device that is received in the transaction is recognized as inventory. If the customer does not exercise the trade-in option at the time of eligibility, TDS begins amortizing the liability and records this amortization as additional equipment revenue. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the guarantee liability related to these plans was $11 million and $15 million, respectively, and is reflected in Customer deposits and deferred revenues in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The following table summarizes equipment installment plan receivables as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. December 31, 2018 2017 (Dollars in millions) Equipment installment plan receivables, gross . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 974 – $ 873 (80) Equipment installment plan receivables, net of deferred interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allowance for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974 (70) 793 (65) Equipment installment plan receivables, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 904 $ 728 Net balance presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as: Accounts receivable — Customers and agents (Current portion) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets and deferred charges (Non-current portion) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 565 339 $ 428 300 Equipment installment plan receivables, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 904 $ 728 TDS uses various inputs, including internal data, information from credit bureaus and other sources, to evaluate the credit profiles of its customers. From this evaluation, a credit class is assigned to the customer that determines the number of eligible lines, the amount of credit available, and the down payment requirement, if any. Customers assigned to credit classes requiring no down payment represent a lower risk category, whereas those assigned to credit classes requiring a down payment represent a higher risk category. The balance and aging of the equipment installment plan receivables on a gross basis by credit category were as follows: December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Lower Risk Higher Risk Total Lower Risk Higher Risk Total (Dollars in millions) Unbilled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Billed — current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Billed — past due . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment installment plan receivables, 904 $ 35 15 17 $ 1 2 921 $ 36 17 807 $ 31 12 20 $ 1 2 gross . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 954 $ 20 $ 974 $ 850 $ 23 $ 827 32 14 873 72 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The activity in the allowance for credit losses for equipment installment plan receivables was as follows: (Dollars in millions) Allowance for credit losses, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bad debts expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Write-offs, net of recoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 65 64 (59) $ 50 62 (47) Allowance for credit losses, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 70 $ 65 TDS recorded out-of-period adjustments in 2016 due to errors related to equipment installment plan transactions occurring in 2015. These adjustments had the impact of increasing Equipment and product sales revenues by $2 million, decreasing bad debts expense, which is a component of Selling, general and administrative expense, by $2 million and increasing Income before income taxes by $4 million in 2016. 2018 2017 NOTE 5 INCOME TAXES TDS’ current income taxes balances at December 31, 2018 and 2017, were as follows: December 31, 2018 2017 (Dollars in millions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Federal income taxes receivable (payable) Net state income taxes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 6 6 (17) 2 Income tax expense (benefit) is summarized as follows: Year Ended December 31, (Dollars in millions) Current 2018 2017 2016 Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Deferred Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10 3 24 9 46 $ $ 77 13 (366) (3) $ (279) $ 17 1 20 2 40 In December 2017, the Tax Act was signed into law. Following the guidance of the FASB’s Accounting Standards Update 2018-05, Income Taxes: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income tax expense (benefit) for the year ended December 31, 2017, included a provisional estimate for the impact of the Tax Act on TDS’ 2017 depreciation deduction. During 2018, TDS completed a full analysis of depreciation deductions related to fixed assets placed in service during 2017 and Income tax expense (benefit) for 2018 included a benefit of $4 million related to this adjustment. 73 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS A reconciliation of TDS’ income tax expense computed at the statutory rate to the reported income tax expense, and the statutory federal income tax expense rate to TDS’ effective income tax expense rate is as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate (Dollars in millions) Statutory federal income tax expense and rate . . . . . . . . State income taxes, net of federal benefit1 . . . . . . . . . . Effect of noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Federal income tax rate change2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in federal valuation allowance3 . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill impairment4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nondeductible compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other differences, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total income tax expense (benefit) and rate . . . . . . . . . $ 46 11 (1) (16) (1) – 9 (2) 46 21.0% $ 4.9 (0.4) (7.1) (0.3) – 4.1 (1.2) 21.0% $ (43) 6 (2) (314) (5) 71 10 (2) (279) 35.0% $ (5.2) 1.7 257.5 4.3 (58.2) (8.1) 2.1 229.1% $ 32 2 (1) – 2 – 3 2 40 35.0% 2.5 (0.8) – 2.6 – 2.7 1.2 43.2% 1 State income taxes, net of federal benefit, include changes in unrecognized tax benefits as well as adjustments to the valuation allowance. 2 Federal income tax rate change due to the Tax Act reducing the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% resulting in a tax benefit in 2018 due primarily to an income tax accounting method change that accelerated tax depreciation on certain assets for the 2017 tax year. The $314 million tax benefit in 2017 related to adjusting the deferred tax liability to the lower tax rate upon enactment of the Tax Act. 3 Change in federal valuation allowance in 2018 includes a change in judgment related to net operating loss carryforwards that are now realizable due to an internal restructuring, offset by current year interest expense carryforwards not expected to be realized. 4 Goodwill impairment reflects an adjustment to increase 2017 income tax expense by $71 million related to a portion of the impaired goodwill that is not amortizable for income tax purposes. See Note 7 — Intangible Assets for additional information related to the goodwill impairment. Significant components of TDS’ deferred income tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2018 and 2017, were as follows: December 31, (Dollars in millions) Deferred tax assets Net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation and benefits - other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred rent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax liabilities Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Licenses/intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Partnership investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net deferred income tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as: Deferred income tax liability, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets and deferred charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net deferred income tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 2017 $ $ $ $ 159 31 8 22 90 310 (135) 175 390 237 134 54 815 640 640 – 640 $ $ $ $ 167 42 9 21 70 309 (147) 162 368 221 123 – 712 550 552 (2) 550 At December 31, 2018, TDS and certain subsidiaries had $2,843 million of state NOL carryforwards (generating a $146 million deferred tax asset) available to offset future taxable income. The state NOL carryforwards expire between 2019 and 2038. Certain subsidiaries had federal NOL carryforwards (generating a $13 million deferred tax asset) available to offset their future taxable income. The federal NOL carryforwards generally expire between 2019 and 2037, with the exception of federal NOLs generated after 2017, which do not expire. A valuation allowance was established for 74 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS certain state NOL carryforwards and federal NOL carryforwards since it is more likely than not that a portion of such carryforwards will expire before they can be utilized. A summary of TDS’ deferred tax asset valuation allowance is as follows: (Dollars in millions) Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charged to income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charged to Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 147 (5) (7) $ 122 25 – $ 113 9 – Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 135 $ 147 $ 122 2018 2017 2016 A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: (Dollars in millions) Unrecognized tax benefits balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions for tax positions of current year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reductions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reductions for lapses in statutes of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 46 8 2 (1) (6) Unrecognized tax benefits balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 49 $ 42 6 1 (1) (2) 46 $ 39 11 3 (1) (10) $ 42 2018 2017 2016 Unrecognized tax benefits are included in Accrued taxes and Other deferred liabilities and credits in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. If these benefits were recognized, they would have reduced income tax expense in 2018, 2017 and 2016 by $39 million, $37 million and $28 million, respectively, net of the federal benefit from state income taxes. TDS recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in Income tax expense (benefit). The amounts charged to income tax expense related to interest and penalties resulted in an expense of less than $1 million in 2018, an expense of $3 million in 2017 and a benefit of $1 million in 2016. Net accrued liabilities for interest and penalties were $19 million and $19 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and are included in Other deferred liabilities and credits in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. TDS and its subsidiaries file federal and state income tax returns. With only limited exceptions, TDS is no longer subject to federal and state income tax audits for the years prior to 2013. NOTE 6 EARNINGS PER SHARE Basic earnings per share available to TDS common shareholders is computed by dividing Net income available to TDS common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share available to TDS common shareholders is computed by dividing Net income available to TDS common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period adjusted to include the effects of potentially dilutive securities. Potentially dilutive securities primarily include incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and the vesting of performance and restricted stock units. 75 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The amounts used in computing earnings per common share and the effects of potentially dilutive securities on the weighted average number of common shares were as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (Dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts) Basic earnings per share available to TDS common shareholders: Net income available to TDS common shareholders used in basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to compute diluted earnings: $ 135 $ 153 $ Noncontrolling interest adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) – Net income available to TDS common shareholders in diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 133 $ 153 $ Weighted average number of shares used in basic earnings per share: Common Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Series A Common Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effects of dilutive securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average number of shares used in diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 7 112 2 114 104 7 111 1 112 43 – 43 103 7 110 1 111 Basic earnings per share available to TDS common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.20 $ 1.39 $ 0.39 Diluted earnings per share available to TDS common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.17 $ 1.37 $ 0.39 Certain Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, vesting of performance and restricted stock units or conversion of preferred shares were not included in average diluted shares outstanding for the calculation of Diluted earnings per share available to TDS common shareholders because their effects were antidilutive. The number of such Common Shares excluded was 3 million shares, 4 million shares and 4 million shares for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. NOTE 7 INTANGIBLE ASSETS Information related to TDS’ Licenses, Goodwill and Other intangible assets is presented below. Prior to 2009, TDS accounted for U.S. Cellular’s share repurchases as step acquisitions, allocating a portion of the share repurchase value to TDS’ Licenses and Goodwill. Further, a goodwill impairment loss on the U.S. Cellular reporting unit was recognized in 2003 at TDS but not at U.S. Cellular. Consequently, U.S. Cellular’s Licenses and Goodwill on a stand-alone basis do not equal the TDS consolidated Licenses and Goodwill related to U.S. Cellular. 76 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Licenses On occasion, TDS reviews attractive opportunities to acquire additional wireless spectrum, including pursuant to FCC auctions. TDS also may seek to divest outright or include in exchanges wireless spectrum that is not strategic to its long-term success. Activity related to TDS’ Licenses is presented below. U.S. Cellular Wireline Cable Total (Dollars in millions) Balance at December 31, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transferred to Assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exchanges — Licenses received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exchanges — Licenses surrendered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Balance at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transferred to Assets held for sale1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Divestitures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exchanges — Licenses received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exchanges — Licenses surrendered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,890 331 (10) 25 (9) 2,227 8 (51) (11) 18 (1) Balance at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,190 $ 2 – – – – 2 – – – – – 2 $ $ 3 – – – – 3 – – – – – 3 $ $ 1,895 331 (10) 25 (9) 2,232 8 (51) (11) 18 (1) 2,195 1 Licenses classified as Assets held for sale in 2018 are included in transactions which closed in the first quarter of 2019. Auction 1002 In July 2016, the FCC announced U.S. Cellular as a qualified bidder in the FCC’s forward auction of 600 MHz spectrum licenses, referred to as Auction 1002. Prior to commencement of the forward auction, U.S. Cellular made an upfront payment to the FCC of $143 million in June 2016 to establish its initial bidding eligibility. In April 2017, the FCC announced by way of public notice that U.S. Cellular was the winning bidder for 188 licenses for an aggregate purchase price of $329 million. U.S. Cellular paid the remaining $186 million to the FCC and was granted the licenses during the second quarter of 2017. Goodwill Activity related to TDS’ Goodwill is presented below. U.S. Cellular Wireline Cable Other Total (Dollars in millions) Balance at December 31, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on impairment $ Balance at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Balance at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 227 – (227) – – – $ $ 409 – – 409 – 409 $ $ 95 5 – 100 – 100 $ $ 35 – (35) – – – $ $ 766 5 (262) 509 – 509 Accumulated impairment losses in prior periods were $334 million for U.S. Cellular, $29 million for Wireline, and $88 million for Other. Goodwill Interim Impairment Assessment U.S. Cellular Based on 2017 developments, including wireless expansion plans announced by other companies and the results of the FCC’s forward auction of 600 MHz spectrum licenses and other FCC actions, U.S. Cellular anticipated increased competition for customers in its primary operating markets from new and existing market participants over the long term. In addition, the widening adoption of unlimited data plans and other data pricing constructs across the industry, including U.S. Cellular’s introduction of unlimited plans in 2017, may limit the industry’s ability to monetize future growth in data usage. These factors when assessed and considered as part of U.S. Cellular’s annual planning process 77 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS conducted in the third quarter of each year caused management to revise its long-range financial forecast in the third quarter of 2017. Based on the factors noted above, management identified a triggering event and performed a quantitative goodwill impairment test on an interim basis. TDS used a one-step quantitative approach that compared the fair value of the U.S. Cellular reporting unit to its carrying value. A discounted cash flow approach was used to value the reporting unit, using value drivers and risks specific to U.S. Cellular and the industry and current economic factors. The cash flow estimates incorporated certain assumptions that market participants would use in their estimates of fair value and may not be indicative of U.S. Cellular specific assumptions. However, the discount rate used in the analysis considers any additional risk a market participant might place on integrating the U.S. Cellular reporting unit into its operations. The results of the interim goodwill impairment test indicated that the carrying value of the U.S. Cellular reporting unit exceeded its fair value. Therefore, TDS recognized a loss on impairment of goodwill of $227 million to reduce the carrying value of goodwill for the U.S. Cellular reporting unit to zero in the third quarter of 2017. Other During the third quarter of 2017, due to slower than expected service revenue growth and revenue mix trending towards a higher proportion of lower margin revenue streams, management identified a triggering event related to its HMS operations and performed a quantitative goodwill impairment test on an interim basis. TDS used a one-step quantitative approach that compared the fair value of its HMS operations to the carrying value. TDS used the discounted cash flow approach and guideline public company method to value the HMS operations. The discounted cash flow approach uses value drivers and considers risks specific to the industry as well as current economic factors. The guideline public company method develops an indication of fair value by calculating average market pricing multiples for selected publicly-traded companies. The developed multiples were applied to applicable financial measures of the HMS operations to determine fair value. The discounted cash flow approach and guideline public company method were weighted to arrive at the total fair value used for impairment testing. The results of the interim goodwill impairment test indicated that the carrying value of the HMS operations exceeded its fair value. Therefore, TDS recognized a loss on impairment of goodwill of $35 million to reduce the carrying value of goodwill for the HMS operations to zero in the third quarter of 2017. Other intangible assets Activity related to TDS’ Other intangible assets is presented below. December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Gross Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Amount Gross Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Amount (Dollars in millions) Franchise rights . . . . . . Customer lists and Trade name . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 255 $ (17) $ 238 $ 255 $ – $ 166 421 (151) 15 $ (168) $ 253 $ 166 421 $ (142) (142) $ 255 24 279 As discussed in Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements, effective January 1 2018, TDS prospectively changed its assessment of useful life for its franchise rights from indefinite- lived to 15 years. Amortization expense for intangible assets was $26 million, $11 million, and $14 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Based on the current balance of finite-lived intangible assets, the estimated amortization expense is $24 million, $21 million, $19 million, $19 million and $18 million for the years 2019 through 2023, respectively. NOTE 8 INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES Investments in unconsolidated entities consist of amounts invested in entities in which TDS holds a noncontrolling interest. On January 1, 2018, TDS adopted Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, Financial Instruments — Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (ASU 2016-01) using the modified retrospective approach. Accordingly, prior periods have not been recast to reflect the new accounting principle. Equity securities are 78 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS measured at fair value with changes in value recognized in Net income. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of ASU 2016-01 resulted in an increase of $1 million in retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. TDS’ Investments in unconsolidated entities are accounted for using either the equity method or measurement alternative method as shown in the table below. The measurement alternative method was elected for investments without readily determinable fair values formerly accounted for under the cost method. The measurement alternative value represents cost minus any impairments plus or minus any observable price changes. TDS did not have an impairment or observable price change related to these investments in 2018. December 31, (Dollars in millions) Equity method investments: Capital contributions, loans, advances and adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cumulative share of income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cumulative share of distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total equity method investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Measurement alternative method investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total investments in unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2018 2017 116 1,930 (1,587) 459 21 480 $ $ 116 1,753 (1,434) 435 18 453 The following tables, which are based on information provided in part by third parties, summarize the combined assets, liabilities and equity, and results of operations of TDS’ equity method investments: December 31, (Dollars in millions) Assets 2018 2017 Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Due from affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liabilities and Equity Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Partners’ capital and shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ $ $ 920 379 5,010 6,309 436 180 225 – 5,468 Total liabilities and equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,309 $ 705 323 4,852 5,880 436 181 208 1 5,054 5,880 Year Ended December 31, (Dollars in millions) Results of Operations 2018 2017 2016 Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,801 4,985 1,816 9 $ 6,585 4,985 1,600 (3) Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,825 $ 1,597 $ 6,769 5,068 1,701 (13) 1,688 79 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 9 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT TDS’ Property, plant and equipment in service and under construction, and related accumulated depreciation and amortization, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, were as follows: December 31, (Dollars in millions) Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leasehold and land improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cable and wire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Network and switching equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cell site equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office furniture and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other operating assets and equipment System development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Work in process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Useful Lives (Years) $ N/A 5-40 1-30 15-35 3-13 7-25 3-10 3-12 1-7 N/A $ 2018 55 523 1,245 1,884 2,423 3,460 378 193 1,486 427 2017 55 519 1,214 1,802 2,361 3,411 480 194 1,387 319 Total property, plant and equipment, gross . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,074 (8,728) 11,742 (8,318) Total property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,346 $ 3,424 Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $839 million, $817 million and $820 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In 2018, 2017 and 2016, (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net included charges of $9 million, $21 million and $27 million, respectively, related to disposals of assets, trade-ins of older assets for replacement assets and other retirements of assets from service in the normal course of business. During the second quarter of 2016, TDS recorded an out-of-period adjustment attributable to 2014 and 2015 related to the over-depreciation of certain assets in the Wireline segment. TDS has determined that this adjustment was not material to the prior annual periods and also was not material to 2016 results. As a result of this out-of-period adjustment, Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense decreased by $4 million in 2016. NOTE 10 ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS U.S. Cellular is subject to asset retirement obligations associated with its leased cell sites, switching office sites, retail store sites and office locations. Asset retirement obligations generally include obligations to restore leased land, towers, retail store and office premises to their pre-lease conditions. TDS Telecom owns poles, cable and wire and certain buildings and also leases office space and property used for housing central office switching equipment and fiber cable. These assets and leases often have removal or remediation requirements associated with them. For example, TDS Telecom’s poles, cable and wire are often located on property that is not owned by TDS Telecom and may be subject to the provisions of easements, permits, or leasing arrangements. Pursuant to the terms of the permits, easements, or leasing arrangements, TDS Telecom is often required to remove these assets and return the property to its original condition at some defined date in the future. Asset retirement obligations are included in Other deferred liabilities and credits in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. 80 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In 2018 and 2017, U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom performed a review of the assumptions and estimated costs related to asset retirement obligations. The results of the reviews (identified as Revisions in estimated cash outflows) and other changes in asset retirement obligations during 2018 and 2017, were as follows: (Dollars in millions) Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional liabilities accrued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Revisions in estimated cash outflows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Disposition of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accretion expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transferred to Liabilities held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 283 2 6 – (1) 18 (1) Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 307 $ 266 1 (1) 1 (1) 17 – 283 2018 2017 NOTE 11 DEBT Revolving Credit Agreements At December 31, 2018, TDS and U.S. Cellular had revolving credit agreements available for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions, spectrum purchases and capital expenditures. In May 2018, TDS entered into a new $400 million revolving credit agreement with certain lenders and other parties and U.S. Cellular entered into a new $300 million revolving credit agreement with certain lenders and other parties. As a result of the new agreements, TDS’ and U.S. Cellular’s previous revolving credit agreements due to expire in June 2021 were terminated. Amounts under the revolving credit agreements may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed from time to time until maturity in May 2023. As of December 31, 2018, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit agreements, except for letters of credit. Interest expense representing commitment fees on the unused portion of the revolving lines of credit was $2 million in each of 2018, 2017 and 2016. The commitment fees are based on the unsecured senior debt ratings assigned to TDS and U.S. Cellular by certain ratings agencies. The following table summarizes the revolving credit agreements as of December 31, 2018: TDS U.S. Cellular (Dollars in millions) Maximum borrowing capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Letters of credit outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amount borrowed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amount available for use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ 400 1 – 399 $ $ $ $ 300 2 – 298 Borrowings under the revolving credit agreements bear interest either at a London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.75% or at an alternative Base Rate as defined in the revolving credit agreement plus 0.75%, at TDS’ or U.S. Cellular’s option. TDS and U.S. Cellular may select a borrowing period of either one, two, three or six months (or other period of twelve months or less if requested by TDS or U.S. Cellular and approved by the lenders). TDS’ and U.S. Cellular’s credit spread and commitment fees on their revolving credit agreements may be subject to increase if their current credit ratings from nationally recognized credit rating agencies are lowered, and may be subject to decrease if the ratings are raised. In connection with U.S. Cellular’s revolving credit agreement, TDS and U.S. Cellular entered into a subordination agreement dated May 10, 2018, together with the administrative agent for the lenders under U.S. Cellular’s revolving credit agreement. Pursuant to this subordination agreement, (a) any consolidated funded indebtedness from U.S. Cellular to TDS will be unsecured and (b) any (i) consolidated funded indebtedness from U.S. Cellular to TDS (other than ‘‘refinancing indebtedness’’ as defined in the subordination agreement) in excess of $105 million and (ii) refinancing indebtedness in excess of $250 million will be subordinated and made junior in right of payment to the prior payment in full of obligations to the lenders under U.S. Cellular’s revolving credit agreement. As of December 31, 2018, U.S. Cellular had no outstanding consolidated funded indebtedness or refinancing indebtedness that was subordinated to the revolving credit agreement pursuant to the subordination agreement. 81 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The continued availability of the revolving credit agreements requires TDS and U.S. Cellular to comply with certain negative and affirmative covenants, maintain certain financial ratios and make representations regarding certain matters at the time of each borrowing. The revolving credit agreements include the following financial covenants: (cid:2) Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio may not be less than 3.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter. (cid:2) Consolidated Leverage Ratio may not be greater than the ratios indicated as of the end of any fiscal quarter for each period specified below: Period Ratios From the agreement date of May 10, 2018 through June 30, 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . From July 1, 2019 and thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.25 to 1.00 3.00 to 1.00 Certain TDS and U.S. Cellular wholly-owned subsidiaries have jointly and severally unconditionally guaranteed the payment and performance of the obligations of TDS and U.S. Cellular under the revolving credit agreements pursuant to a guaranty dated May 10, 2018. Other subsidiaries that meet certain criteria will be required to provide a similar guaranty in the future. TDS and U.S. Cellular believe that they were in compliance with all of the financial and other covenants and requirements set forth in their revolving credit agreements as of December 31, 2018. Term Loan In July 2015, U.S. Cellular borrowed $225 million on a senior term loan credit agreement in two separate draws. This agreement was entered into in January 2015, amended and restated in June 2016, and further amended in May 2018. The interest rate on outstanding borrowings is reset at one, three or six month intervals at a rate of LIBOR plus 250 basis points. This credit agreement provides for the draws to be continued on a long-term basis under terms that are readily determinable. U.S. Cellular has the ability and intent to carry the debt for the duration of the agreement. Principal reductions are due and payable in quarterly installments of $3 million beginning in March 2016 through December 2021, and the remaining unpaid balance will be due and payable in January 2022. The senior term loan credit agreement contains financial covenants and subsidiary guarantees that are consistent with the revolving credit agreements described above. This agreement was entered into for general corporate purposes, including working capital, spectrum purchases and capital expenditures. U.S. Cellular believes that it was in compliance with all of the financial and other covenants and requirements set forth in its term loan credit agreement as of December 31, 2018. In connection with U.S. Cellular’s term loan credit agreement, TDS and U.S. Cellular entered into a subordination agreement in June 2016 together with the administrative agent for the lenders under U.S. Cellular’s term loan credit agreement, which is substantially the same as the subordination agreement for U.S. Cellular as described above under the ‘‘Revolving Credit Agreements.’’ As of December 31, 2018, U.S. Cellular had no outstanding consolidated funded indebtedness or refinancing indebtedness that was subordinated to the term loan agreement pursuant to this subordination agreement. Receivables Securitization Agreement In December 2017, U.S. Cellular, through its subsidiaries, entered into a $200 million credit agreement to permit securitized borrowings using its equipment installment receivables for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions, spectrum purchases and capital expenditures. In connection with the receivables securitization agreement, U.S. Cellular formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, USCC Master Note Trust (Trust), which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity. Under the terms of the agreement, U.S. Cellular, through its subsidiaries, transfers eligible equipment installment receivables to the Trust. The Trust then utilizes the transferred assets as collateral for notes payables issued to third party financial institutions. Since U.S. Cellular retains effective control of the transferred assets in the Trust, any activity associated with this receivables securitization agreement will be treated as a secured borrowing. Therefore, TDS will continue to report equipment installment receivables and any related balances on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Cash received from borrowings under the receivables securitization agreement will be reported as Debt. Refer to Note 14 — Variable Interest Entities for additional information. U.S. Cellular entered into a performance guaranty whereby U.S. Cellular guarantees the performance of certain wholly- owned subsidiaries of U.S. Cellular under the receivables securitization agreement. Amounts under the receivables securitization agreement may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed from time to time until maturity in December 2019, 82 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS which may be extended from time to time as specified therein. As of December 31, 2018, there were no outstanding borrowings under the receivables securitization agreement, and the entire unused capacity of $200 million was available, subject to sufficient collateral to satisfy the asset borrowing base provisions of the agreement. As of December 31, 2018, the Trust held $63 million of assets available to be pledged as collateral for the receivables securitization agreement. The continued availability of the receivables securitization agreement requires U.S. Cellular to comply with certain negative and affirmative covenants, maintain certain financial ratios and provide representations on certain matters at the time of each borrowing. The covenants include the same financial covenants for U.S. Cellular as described above under the ‘‘Revolving Credit Agreements.’’ TDS believes that U.S. Cellular was in compliance as of December 31, 2018, with all of the financial covenants and requirements set forth in its receivables securitization agreement. Other Long-Term Debt Long-term debt as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, was as follows: December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Call date (any time on or after) Principal Amount Less Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs Issuance Maturity date date (Dollars in millions) TDS Unsecured Senior Notes 6.625% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mar 2005 Mar 2045 Mar 2010 $ 6.875% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nov 2010 Nov 2059 Nov 2015 7.000% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mar 2011 Mar 2060 Mar 2016 5.875% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec 2012 Dec 2061 Dec 2017 U.S. Cellular Unsecured Senior Notes Dec 2003 and Dec 2003 and 6.700% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 2004 Dec 2033 June 2004 $ 6.950% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 2011 May 2060 May 2016 7.250% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec 2014 Dec 2063 Dec 2019 7.250% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nov 2015 Dec 2064 Dec 2020 Term Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jul 2015 Jan 2022 Capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Installment payment agreement Other long-term notes . . . . . . . Through 2021 116 225 300 195 544 342 275 300 191 6 15 3 $ 3 7 9 7 $ 14 11 10 10 1 – 1 – Less Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs Total $ 3 7 9 7 $ 15 11 10 10 2 – 1 – $ $ 113 218 291 188 529 331 265 290 201 5 22 4 Total Principal Amount $ $ 113 $ 218 291 188 530 $ 331 265 290 190 6 14 3 116 225 300 195 544 342 275 300 203 5 23 4 Total long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,512 $ 73 $ 2,439 $ 2,532 $ 75 $ 2,457 Long-term debt, current . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt, noncurrent . . . . . . . $ 21 $ 2,418 $ 20 $ 2,437 TDS may redeem its callable notes and U.S. Cellular may redeem its 6.95% Senior Notes, 7.25% 2063 Senior Notes and 7.25% 2064 Senior Notes, in whole or in part at any time after the respective call date, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest. U.S. Cellular may redeem the 6.7% Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to maturity at a redemption price equal to the greater of (a) 100% of the principal amount of such notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, or (b) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the Treasury Rate plus 30 basis points. Interest on the Senior Notes outstanding at December 31, 2018, is payable quarterly, with the exception of U.S. Cellular’s 6.7% Senior Notes for which interest is payable semi-annually. The annual requirements for principal payments on long-term debt are approximately $21 million, $21 million, $12 million, $158 million and less than $1 million for the years 2019 through 2023, respectively. The covenants associated with TDS and its subsidiaries’ long-term debt obligations, among other things, restrict TDS’ ability, subject to certain exclusions, to incur additional liens, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, and sell, consolidate or merge assets. 83 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TDS’ and U.S. Cellular’s long-term debt notes do not contain any provisions resulting in acceleration of the maturities of outstanding debt in the event of a change in TDS’ or U.S. Cellular’s credit rating. However, a downgrade in TDS’ or U.S. Cellular’s credit rating could adversely affect its ability to obtain long-term debt financing in the future. NOTE 12 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS Defined Contribution Plans TDS sponsors a qualified noncontributory defined contribution pension plan. The plan provides benefits for certain employees of TDS Corporate, TDS Telecom and U.S. Cellular. Under this plan, pension costs are calculated separately for each participant and are funded annually. Total pension costs were $16 million in 2018 and 2017, and $17 million in 2016. In addition, TDS sponsors a defined contribution retirement savings plan (401(k) plan). Total costs incurred from TDS’ contributions to the 401(k) plan were $28 million in 2018 and $27 million in 2017 and 2016. TDS also sponsors an unfunded nonqualified deferred supplemental executive retirement plan for certain employees to offset the reduction of benefits caused by the limitation on annual employee compensation under the tax laws. Other Post-Retirement Benefits TDS sponsors a defined benefit post-retirement plan that provides medical benefits to retirees and that covers certain employees of TDS Corporate and TDS Telecom, which is not significant to TDS’ financial position or operating results. The plan is contributory, with retiree contributions adjusted annually. TDS recognizes the funded status of the plan as a component of Other assets and deferred charges in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. Changes in the funded status are included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the Consolidated Balance Sheet before affecting such amounts for income taxes to the extent that such changes are not recognized in earnings as a component of net periodic benefit cost. The post-retirement benefit fund invests mainly in mutual funds that hold U.S. equities, international equities, and debt securities. The post-retirement benefit fund does not hold any debt or equity securities issued by TDS, U.S. Cellular or any related parties. The fair value of the plan assets of the post-retirement benefit fund was $55 million and $59 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The total plan benefit obligations were $49 million and $45 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Therefore, the total funded status was an asset of $6 million and $14 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. TDS is not required to set aside current funds for its future retiree health insurance benefits. The decision to contribute to the plan assets is based upon several factors, including the funded status of the plan, market conditions, alternative investment opportunities, tax benefits and other circumstances. In accordance with applicable income tax regulations, annual contributions to fund the costs of future retiree medical benefits may not exceed certain thresholds. TDS has not determined whether it will make a contribution to the plan in 2019. 84 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 13 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Purchase Obligations TDS has obligations payable under non-cancellable contracts, commitments for device purchases, network facilities and transport services, agreements for software licensing, long-term marketing programs, as well as certain agreements to purchase goods or services. Where applicable, TDS calculates its obligation based on termination fees that can be paid to exit the contract. Future minimum payments required under these commitments as of December 31, 2018 are as follows: Purchase Obligations (Dollars in millions) 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,444 137 78 39 14 25 1,737 Subsequent to December 31, 2018, TDS committed to purchase assets from a third party in the amount of $129 million, subject to regulatory approval. This amount is not included in the 2019 purchase obligations above, which are stated as of December 31, 2018. Lease Commitments TDS and its subsidiaries have leases for certain plant facilities, office space, retail store sites, cell sites, data centers and data-processing equipment which are accounted for as operating leases. Certain leases have renewal options and/or fixed rental increases. Renewal options that are reasonably assured of exercise are included in determining the lease term. Any rent abatements or lease incentives, in addition to fixed rental increases, are included in the calculation of rent expense and calculated on a straight-line basis over the defined lease term. For 2018, 2017 and 2016, rent expense for noncancellable long-term leases was $189 million, $183 million and $177 million, respectively; and rent expense under cancellable short-term leases was $12 million in each respective year. TDS and its subsidiaries are also the lessors for tower and colocation space and certain plant facilities which are accounted for as operating leases. The leased assets are included in Property, plant and equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of December 31, 2018, future minimum rental payments required under operating leases and rental receipts expected under operating leases that have noncancellable lease terms in excess of one year were as follows: Operating Leases Operating Leases Future Minimum Rental Receipts Future Minimum Rental Payments (Dollars in millions) 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 170 158 142 126 110 784 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,490 $ 59 48 35 23 10 7 182 Indemnifications TDS enters into agreements in the normal course of business that provide for indemnification of counterparties. The terms of the indemnifications vary by agreement. The events or circumstances that would require TDS to perform under 85 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS these indemnities are transaction specific; however, these agreements may require TDS to indemnify the counterparty for costs and losses incurred from litigation or claims arising from the underlying transaction. TDS is unable to estimate the maximum potential liability for these types of indemnifications as the amounts are dependent on the outcome of future events, the nature and likelihood of which cannot be determined at this time. Historically, TDS has not made any significant indemnification payments under such agreements. Legal Proceedings TDS is involved or may be involved from time to time in legal proceedings before the FCC, other regulatory authorities, and/or various state and federal courts. If TDS believes that a loss arising from such legal proceedings is probable and can be reasonably estimated, an amount is accrued in the financial statements for the estimated loss. If only a range of loss can be determined, the best estimate within that range is accrued; if none of the estimates within that range is better than another, the low end of the range is accrued. The assessment of the expected outcomes of legal proceedings is a highly subjective process that requires judgments about future events. The legal proceedings are reviewed at least quarterly to determine the adequacy of accruals and related financial statement disclosures. The ultimate outcomes of legal proceedings could differ materially from amounts accrued in the financial statements. TDS has accrued less than $1 million and $1 million with respect to legal proceedings and unasserted claims as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. TDS has not accrued any amount for legal proceedings if it cannot estimate the amount of the possible loss or range of loss. TDS is unable to estimate any contingent loss in excess of the amounts accrued. The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has notified TDS that it is conducting inquiries of U.S. Cellular and TDS under the federal False Claims Act. The DOJ is investigating U.S. Cellular’s participation in spectrum auctions 58, 66, 73 and 97 conducted by the FCC. U.S. Cellular is a limited partner in several limited partnerships which qualified for the 25% bid credit in each auction. TDS and U.S. Cellular are cooperating with the DOJ’s review. TDS and U.S. Cellular believe that U.S. Cellular’s arrangements with the limited partnerships and the limited partnerships’ participation in the FCC auctions complied with applicable law and FCC rules. At this time, TDS cannot predict the outcome of this review. NOTE 14 VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES Consolidated VIEs TDS consolidates VIEs in which it has a controlling financial interest as defined by GAAP and is therefore deemed the primary beneficiary. A controlling financial interest will have both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the VIE activities that most significantly impact economic performance; and (b) the obligation to absorb the VIE losses and the right to receive benefits that are significant to the VIE. TDS reviews these criteria initially at the time it enters into agreements and subsequently when events warranting reconsideration occur. These VIEs have risks similar to those described in the ‘‘Risk Factors’’ in TDS’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. During 2017, U.S. Cellular formed USCC EIP LLC (Seller/Sub-Servicer), USCC Receivables Funding LLC (Transferor) and the Trust, collectively the special purpose entities (SPEs), to facilitate a securitized borrowing using its equipment installment plan receivables. Under a Receivables Sale Agreement, U.S. Cellular wholly-owned, majority-owned and unconsolidated entities, collectively referred to as ‘‘affiliated entities’’, will transfer device equipment installment plan contracts to the Seller/Sub-Servicer. The Seller/Sub-Servicer will aggregate device equipment installment plan contracts, and perform servicing, collection and all other administrative activities related to accounting for the equipment installment plan contracts. The Seller/Sub-Servicer will sell the eligible equipment installment plan receivables to the Transferor, a bankruptcy remote entity, which will subsequently sell the receivables to the Trust. The Trust, which is bankruptcy remote and isolated from the creditors of U.S. Cellular, will be responsible for issuing asset-backed variable funding notes (Notes), which are collateralized by the equipment installment plan receivables owned by the Trust. Given that U.S. Cellular has the power to direct the activities of these SPEs, and that these SPEs lack sufficient equity to finance their activities, U.S. Cellular is deemed to have a controlling financial interest in the SPEs and, therefore, consolidates them. All transactions with third parties (e.g., issuance of the asset-backed variable funding notes) will be accounted for as a secured borrowing due to the pledging of equipment installment plan contracts as collateral, significant continuing involvement in the transferred assets, subordinated interests of the cash flows, and continued evidence of control of the receivables. Refer to Note 11 — Debt, Receivables Securitization Agreement for additional details regarding the securitization agreement for which these entities were established. 86 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following VIEs were formed to participate in FCC auctions of wireless spectrum and to fund, establish, and provide wireless service with respect to any FCC licenses won in the auctions: (cid:2) Advantage Spectrum, L.P. (Advantage Spectrum) and Sunshine Spectrum, Inc., the general partner of Advantage Spectrum; and (cid:2) King Street Wireless, L.P. (King Street Wireless) and King Street Wireless, Inc., the general partner of King Street Wireless. These particular VIEs are collectively referred to as designated entities. The power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these VIEs is shared. Specifically, the general partner of these VIEs has the exclusive right to manage, operate and control the limited partnerships and make all decisions to carry on the business of the partnerships. The general partner of each partnership needs the consent of the limited partner, an indirect TDS subsidiary, to sell or lease certain licenses, to make certain large expenditures, admit other partners or liquidate the limited partnerships. Although the power to direct the activities of these VIEs is shared, TDS has the most significant level of exposure to the variability associated with the economic performance of the VIEs, indicating that TDS is the primary beneficiary of the VIEs. Therefore, in accordance with GAAP, these VIEs are consolidated. During 2018, U.S. Cellular received liquidating distributions from Aquinas Wireless, L.P. (Aquinas Wireless). Subsequent to the final distribution date, Aquinas Wireless had no remaining assets and was dissolved. TDS also consolidates other VIEs that are limited partnerships that provide wireless service. A limited partnership is a variable interest entity unless the limited partners hold substantive participating rights or kick-out rights over the general partner. For certain limited partnerships, U.S. Cellular is the general partner and manages the operations. In these partnerships, the limited partners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights and, further, such limited partners do not have the authority to remove the general partner. Therefore, these limited partnerships are also recognized as VIEs and are consolidated under the variable interest model. The following table presents the classification and balances of the consolidated VIEs’ assets and liabilities in TDS’ Consolidated Balance Sheet. December 31, (Dollars in millions) Assets 2018 2017 Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets and deferred charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liabilities Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred liabilities and credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ 9 17 609 5 5 647 88 347 1,727 31 15 46 $ $ $ $ 3 – 473 4 3 648 89 304 1,524 36 12 48 Unconsolidated VIEs TDS manages the operations of and holds a variable interest in certain other limited partnerships, but is not the primary beneficiary of these entities and, therefore, does not consolidate them under the variable interest model. TDS’ total investment in these unconsolidated entities was $4 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, and is included in Investments in unconsolidated entities in TDS’ Consolidated Balance Sheet. The maximum exposure from unconsolidated VIEs is limited to the investment held by TDS in those entities. 87 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Other Related Matters TDS made contributions, loans and/or advances to its VIEs totaling $152 million, $821 million, and $98 million during 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively; of which $116 million in 2018 and $790 million in 2017 are related to USCC EIP LLC as discussed above. TDS may agree to make additional capital contributions and/or advances to these or other VIEs and/or to their general partners to provide additional funding for operations or the development of licenses granted in various auctions. TDS may finance such amounts with a combination of cash on hand, borrowings under its revolving credit agreement and/or other long-term debt. There is no assurance that TDS will be able to obtain additional financing on commercially reasonable terms or at all to provide such financial support. The limited partnership agreements of Advantage Spectrum and King Street Wireless also provide the general partner with a put option whereby the general partner may require the limited partner, a subsidiary of U.S. Cellular, to purchase its interest in the limited partnership. The general partner’s put options related to its interests in King Street Wireless will become exercisable in 2019. The general partner’s put options related to its interest in Advantage Spectrum will become exercisable in 2021 and 2022. The greater of the carrying value of the general partner’s investment or the value of the put option, net of any borrowings due to TDS, is recorded as Noncontrolling interests with redemption features in TDS’ Consolidated Balance Sheet. Also in accordance with GAAP, minority share of income or changes in the redemption value of the put options, net of interest accrued on the loans, are recorded as a component of Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax, in TDS’ Consolidated Statement of Operations. During the first quarter of 2018, TDS recorded an out-of-period adjustment attributable to 2016 and 2017 due to errors in the application of accounting guidance applicable to the calculation of Noncontrolling interests with redemption features related to King Street Wireless, Inc. This out-of-period adjustment had the impact of increasing Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax, by $6 million and decreasing Net income attributable to TDS shareholders by $6 million in 2018. TDS determined that this adjustment was not material to any of the periods impacted. NOTE 15 NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS The following schedule discloses the effects of Net income attributable to TDS shareholders and changes in TDS’ ownership interest in U.S. Cellular on TDS’ equity for 2018, 2017 and 2016: Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 (Dollars in millions) Net income attributable to TDS shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 135 $ 153 $ Transfer (to) from the noncontrolling interests Change in TDS’ Capital in excess of par value from U.S. Cellular’s issuance of U.S. Cellular shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in TDS’ Capital in excess of par value from U.S. Cellular’s repurchase of U.S. Cellular shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net transfers (to) from noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . (30) – (30) (12) – (12) Change from net income attributable to TDS shareholders and transfers (to) from noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 105 $ 141 $ 2016 43 (16) 1 (15) 28 Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Finite-Lived Subsidiaries TDS’ consolidated financial statements include certain noncontrolling interests that meet the GAAP definition of mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. These mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests represent interests held by third parties in consolidated partnerships, where the terms of the underlying partnership agreement provide for a defined termination date at which time the assets of the subsidiary are to be sold, the liabilities are to be extinguished and the remaining net proceeds are to be distributed to the noncontrolling interest holders and TDS in accordance with the respective partnership agreements. The termination dates of these mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests range from 2085 to 2092. The estimated aggregate amount that would be due and payable to settle all of these noncontrolling interests, assuming an orderly liquidation of the finite-lived consolidated partnerships on December 31, 2018, net of estimated liquidation costs, is $17 million. This amount excludes redemption amounts recorded in Noncontrolling interests with redemption 88 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS features in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The estimate of settlement value was based on certain factors and assumptions which are subjective in nature. Changes in those factors and assumptions could result in a materially larger or smaller settlement amount. The corresponding carrying value of the mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests in finite-lived consolidated partnerships at December 31, 2018, was $4 million, and is included in Noncontrolling interests in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The excess of the aggregate settlement value over the aggregate carrying value of these mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests is due primarily to the unrecognized appreciation of the noncontrolling interest holders’ share of the underlying net assets in the consolidated partnerships. Neither the noncontrolling interest holders’ share, nor TDS’ share, of the appreciation of the underlying net assets of these subsidiaries is reflected in the consolidated financial statements. NOTE 16 COMMON SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Common Stock Series A Common Shares are convertible on a share-for-share basis into Common Shares. In matters other than the election of directors, each Series A Common Share is entitled to ten votes per share, compared to one vote for each Common Share. The Series A Common Shares are entitled to elect eight directors, and the Common Shares elect four. TDS has reserved 7,288,000 Common Shares at December 31, 2018, for possible issuance upon conversion of Series A Common Shares. The following table summarizes the number of Common and Series A Common Shares issued. (Shares in millions) Balance at December 31, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividend reinvestment, incentive and compensation plans . . . . . . . . . Balance at December 31, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividend reinvestment, incentive and compensation plans . . . . . . . . . Balance at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividend reinvestment, incentive and compensation plans . . . . . . . . . Balance at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common Shares Series A Common Shares Common Treasury Shares 126 – 126 – 126 – 126 7 – 7 – 7 – 7 24 (1) 23 (1) 22 (3) 19 On August 2, 2013, the Board of Directors of TDS authorized a $250 million stock repurchase program for the purchase of TDS Common Shares from time to time pursuant to open market purchases, block transactions, private purchases or otherwise, depending on market conditions. This authorization does not have an expiration date. In November 2009, U.S. Cellular announced by Form 8-K that the Board of Directors of U.S. Cellular authorized the repurchase of up to 1,300,000 Common Shares on an annual basis beginning in 2009 and continuing each year thereafter, on a cumulative basis. In December 2016, the U.S. Cellular Board amended this authorization to provide that, beginning on January 1, 2017, the authorized repurchase amount with respect to a particular year will be any amount from zero to 1,300,000 Common Shares, as determined by the Pricing Committee of the Board of Directors, and that if the Pricing Committee did not specify an amount for any year, such amount would be zero for such year. The Pricing Committee has not specified any increase in the authorization since that time. The Pricing Committee also was authorized to decrease the cumulative amount of the authorization at any time, but has not taken any action to do so at this time. As of December 31, 2018, the total cumulative amount of Common Shares authorized to be purchased is 5,901,000. The authorization provides that share repurchases will be made pursuant to open market purchases, block purchases, private purchases, or otherwise, depending on market prices and other conditions. This authorization does not have an expiration date. Tax-Deferred Savings Plan At December 31, 2018,TDS has reserved 90,000 Common Shares for issuance under the TDS Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, a qualified profit-sharing plan pursuant to Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Participating employees have the option of investing their contributions and TDS’ contributions in a TDS Common Share fund, a U.S. Cellular Common Share fund or certain unaffiliated funds. 89 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 17 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION TDS Consolidated The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized during 2018, 2017 and 2016: Year Ended December 31, (Dollars in millions) 2018 2017 2016 Stock option awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock unit awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Performance share awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred compensation bonus and matching stock unit awards . . . . . . . Awards under Non-Employee Director compensation plan . . . . . . . . . . $ Total stock-based compensation, before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5 30 17 – 2 54 (14) $ 10 29 5 1 1 46 (17) Total stock-based compensation expense, net of income taxes . . . . . . . $ 40 $ 29 $ 16 24 – 1 1 42 (16) 26 At December 31, 2018, unrecognized compensation cost for all stock-based compensation awards was $52 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years. The following table provides a summary of the classification of stock-based compensation expense included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended: December 31, (Dollars in millions) 2018 2017 2016 Selling, general and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of services expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 49 5 54 $ $ 42 4 46 $ $ 39 3 42 TDS’ tax benefits realized from the exercise of stock options and the vesting of other awards totaled $15 million in 2018. TDS (Excluding U.S. Cellular) The information in this section relates to stock-based compensation plans using the equity instruments of TDS. Participants in these plans are employees of TDS Corporate and TDS Telecom and Non-employee Directors of TDS. Information related to plans using the equity instruments of U.S. Cellular are shown in the U.S. Cellular section following the TDS section. Under the TDS Long-Term Incentive Plans, TDS may grant fixed and performance based incentive and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and deferred compensation stock unit awards to key employees. TDS had reserved 13,129,000 Common Shares at December 31, 2018, for equity awards granted and to be granted under the TDS Long-Term Incentive Plans in effect. At December 31, 2018, the only types of awards outstanding are fixed non-qualified stock option awards, restricted stock unit awards, performance share awards and deferred compensation stock unit awards. TDS has also established a Non-Employee Directors’ compensation plan under which it has reserved 253,000 TDS Common Shares at December 31, 2018, for issuance as compensation to members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of TDS. TDS uses treasury stock to satisfy requirements for shares issued pursuant to its various stock-based compensation plans. Long-Term Incentive Plan – Stock Options Stock options granted to key employees are exercisable over a specified period not in excess of ten years. Stock options generally vest over periods up to three years from the date of grant. Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2018, expire between 2019 and 2028. However, vested stock options typically expire 30 days after the effective date of an employee’s termination of employment for reasons other than retirement. Employees who leave at the age of retirement have 90 days (or one year if they satisfy certain requirements) within which to exercise their vested stock options. The exercise price of options equals the market value of TDS common stock on the date of grant. 90 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TDS estimated the fair value of stock options granted in 2018, 2017 and 2016 using the Black-Scholes valuation model and the assumptions shown in the table below: Expected life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected annual volatility rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Estimated annual forfeiture rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 6.3 years 28.6% 2.5% 2.9% 3.3% 2017 6.4 years 30.4% 2.2% 2.0% 2.5% 2016 6.2 years 30.3% 2.0% 1.3% 2.7% Pre-vesting forfeitures and expected life are estimated based on historical experience related to similar awards, giving considerations to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. TDS believes that its historical experience provides the best estimates of future pre-vesting forfeitures and future expected life. The expected volatility assumption is based on historical volatility of TDS’ common stock over a period commensurate with the expected life. The dividend yield assumption is equal to the dividends declared in the most recent year as a percentage of the share price on the date of grant. The risk-free interest rate assumption is determined using the U.S. Treasury Yield Curve Rate with a term length that approximates the expected life of the stock options. A summary of TDS stock options (total and portion exercisable) and changes during 2018 is presented in the tables and narrative below. Common Share Options Outstanding at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . (5,927,000 exercisable) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outstanding at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . (3,270,000 exercisable) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of Options 7,861,000 545,000 (2,449,000) (166,000) (1,028,000) 4,763,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Weighted Average Exercise Prices Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions) Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) 27.49 27.04 25.70 25.87 28.62 34.51 26.57 26.12 $ $ 28 21 5.1 3.5 The weighted average grant date fair value per share of the TDS stock options granted in 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $6.33, $7.06 and $7.24, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of TDS stock options exercised in 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $14 million, $1 million and $4 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value at December 31, 2018, presented in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between TDS’ closing stock prices and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by option holders had all options been exercised on December 31, 2018. Long-Term Incentive Plans – Restricted Stock Units TDS also grants restricted stock unit awards to key employees. Each outstanding restricted stock unit is convertible into one Common Share Award. The restricted stock unit awards currently outstanding were granted in 2016, 2017 and 2018 and will vest in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. TDS estimates the fair value of restricted stock units by reducing the grant-date price of TDS’ shares by the present value of the dividends expected to be paid on the underlying shares during the requisite service period, discounted at the appropriate risk-free interest rate, since employees are not entitled to dividends declared on the underlying shares while the restricted stock is unvested. The fair value is then recognized as compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period. 91 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS A summary of TDS nonvested restricted stock units and changes during 2018 is presented in the table below: Common Restricted Stock Units Nonvested at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonvested at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 27.01 23.87 27.56 26.73 25.73 Number 1,175,000 444,000 (322,000) (85,000) 1,212,000 $ $ $ $ $ The total fair values as of the respective vesting dates of restricted stock units vested during 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $9 million, $9 million and $10 million, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of the restricted stock units granted in 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $23.87, $25.97 and $27.87, respectively. Long-Term Incentive Plans – Performance Share Awards (Performance Shares) Beginning in 2016, TDS granted performance shares, specifically performance stock units, to certain TDS executive officers. Each recipient may be entitled to shares of TDS common stock equal to 0% to 200% of a communicated target award depending on the achievement of predetermined performance-based and market-based operating targets over a three year period. Performance-based operating targets include Total Revenue and Return on Capital. Market-based operating targets are measured against TDS’ total shareholder return relative to a defined peer group. Performance shares accumulate dividend equivalents, which are forfeitable if the performance metrics are not achieved. If the predetermined performance-based and market-based operating targets are met, awards granted in 2016, 2017 and 2018 and will vest in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. TDS estimates fair value of performance-based operating targets using TDS’ closing stock price on the date of grant. An estimate of the number of performance shares expected to vest based upon achieving the performance-based operating targets is made and the fair value is expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Each reporting period these estimates are reviewed and stock compensation expense is adjusted accordingly to reflect the new estimates of total awards expected to vest. If any part of the performance shares does not vest as a result of the established performance-based operating targets not being achieved, the related stock compensation expense is reversed. TDS estimates the market-based operating target’s fair value using an internally developed valuation model. This estimated fair value approximated TDS’ closing stock price at the date of grant for market-based share awards granted in 2018, 2017 and 2016. This market-based operating target value determined at the date of grant is expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period and the stock compensation expense is not adjusted during the performance period for the subsequent changes in the value of the market-based share awards and will not be reversed even if the market-based operating target is not achieved. A summary of TDS nonvested performance shares and changes during 2018 is presented in the table below: Common Performance Shares Nonvested at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated dividend equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonvested at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 28.56 25.70 28.57 27.59 27.38 Number 216,000 142,000 (15,000) 7,000 350,000 $ $ $ $ $ No performance shares vested during 2018, 2017 or 2016. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of the performance shares granted in 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $25.70, $27.79, and $29.45, respectively. 92 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Long-Term Incentive Plans – Deferred Compensation Stock Units Certain TDS employees may elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of their annual bonuses and to receive a company matching contribution on the amount deferred. All bonus compensation that is deferred by employees electing to participate is immediately vested and is deemed to be invested in TDS Common Share units. The amount of TDS’ matching contribution depends on the portion of the annual bonus that is deferred. Participants receive a 25% stock unit match for amounts deferred up to 50% of their total annual bonus and a 33% match for amounts that exceed 50% of their total annual bonus; such matching contributions also are deemed to be invested in TDS Common Share units and vest over three years. The total fair values of deferred compensation stock units that vested during 2018, 2017 and 2016 were less than $1 million in each respective year. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of the deferred compensation stock units granted in 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $28.96, $27.13 and $27.94, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, there were 101,000 vested but unissued deferred compensation stock units valued at $3 million. Compensation of Non-Employee Directors TDS issued 32,000, 27,000 and 27,000 Common Shares under its Non-Employee Director plan in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Dividend Reinvestment Plans TDS had reserved 981,000 Common Shares at December 31, 2018, for issuance under Automatic Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plans and 217,000 Series A Common Shares for issuance under the Series A Common Share Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan. These plans enabled holders of TDS’ Common Shares to reinvest cash dividends in Common Shares and holders of Series A Common Shares to reinvest cash dividends in Series A Common Shares. The purchase price of the shares is 95% of the market value, based on the average of the daily high and low sales prices for TDS’ Common Shares on the New York Stock Exchange for the ten trading days preceding the date on which the purchase is made. These plans are considered non-compensatory plans; therefore, no compensation expense is recognized for stock issued under these plans. U.S. Cellular The information in this section relates to stock-based compensation plans using the equity instruments of U.S. Cellular. Participants in these plans are employees of U.S. Cellular and Non-employee Directors of U.S. Cellular. Information related to plans using the equity instruments of TDS are shown in the previous section. U.S. Cellular has established the following stock-based compensation plans: Long-Term Incentive Plans and a Non-Employee Director compensation plan. Under the U.S. Cellular Long-Term Incentive Plans, U.S. Cellular may grant fixed and performance based incentive and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and deferred compensation stock unit awards to key employees. At December 31, 2018, the only types of awards outstanding are fixed non-qualified stock option awards, restricted stock unit awards, performance share awards and deferred compensation stock unit awards. Under the Non-Employee Director compensation plan, U.S. Cellular may grant Common Shares to members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of U.S. Cellular or TDS. At December 31, 2018, U.S. Cellular had reserved 13,286,000 Common Shares for equity awards granted and to be granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plans and 137,000 Common Shares for issuance under the Non-Employee Director compensation plan. U.S. Cellular uses treasury stock to satisfy requirements for Common Shares issued pursuant to its various stock-based compensation plans. Long-Term Incentive Plans – Stock Options Stock options granted to key employees are exercisable over a specified period not in excess of ten years. Stock options generally vest over a period of three years from the date of grant. Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2018, expire between 2019 and 2026. However, vested stock options typically expire 30 days after the effective date of an employee’s termination of employment for reasons other than retirement. Employees who leave at the age of 93 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS retirement have 90 days (or one year if they satisfy certain requirements) within which to exercise their vested stock options. The exercise price of options equals the market value of U.S. Cellular Common Shares on the date of grant. U.S. Cellular did not grant stock option awards in 2018 or 2017. U.S. Cellular estimated the fair value of stock options granted during 2016 using the Black-Scholes valuation model and the assumptions shown in the table below. Expected life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected annual volatility rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Estimated annual forfeiture rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 4.7 years 30.5% –% 1.2% 9.4% Pre-vesting forfeitures and expected life are estimated based on historical experience related to similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. U.S. Cellular believes that its historical experience provides the best estimates of future pre-vesting forfeitures and future expected life. The expected volatility assumption is based on the historical volatility of U.S. Cellular’s common stock over a period commensurate with the expected life. The dividend yield assumption is zero because U.S. Cellular has never paid a dividend, except a special cash dividend in June 2013, and has expressed its intention to retain all future earnings in the business. The risk-free interest rate assumption is determined using the U.S. Treasury Yield Curve Rate with a term length that approximates the expected life of the stock options. The fair value of options is recognized as compensation cost using an accelerated attribution method over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period. A summary of U.S. Cellular stock options outstanding (total and portion exercisable) and changes during 2018 is presented in the table below: Common Share Options Outstanding at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,475,000 exercisable) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outstanding at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . (420,000 exercisable) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of Options 3,495,000 (2,318,000) (19,000) (352,000) 806,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Weighted Average Exercise Price Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions) Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) 41.10 40.79 39.45 43.12 47.29 43.10 42.39 $ $ 7 4 6.0 5.7 The weighted average grant date fair value per share of the U.S. Cellular stock options granted in 2016 was $12.77. The aggregate intrinsic value of U.S. Cellular stock options exercised in 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $19 million, $1 million and $4 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value at December 31, 2018, presented in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between U.S. Cellular’s closing stock price and the exercise price multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by option holders had all options been exercised on December 31, 2018. Long-Term Incentive Plans – Restricted Stock Units Restricted stock unit awards granted to key employees generally vest after three years. The restricted stock unit awards currently outstanding were granted in 2016, 2017 and 2018 and will vest in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. U.S. Cellular estimates the fair value of restricted stock units based on the closing market price of U.S. Cellular shares on the date of grant. The fair value is then recognized as compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period. 94 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS A summary of U.S. Cellular nonvested restricted stock units at December 31, 2018, and changes during the year then ended is presented in the table below: Common Restricted Stock Units Nonvested at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonvested at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 39.67 38.19 37.30 39.78 39.74 Number 1,483,000 559,000 (395,000) (78,000) 1,569,000 $ $ $ $ $ The total fair value of restricted stock units that vested during 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $16 million, $11 million and $15 million, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of the restricted stock units granted in 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $38.19, $38.04 and $43.32, respectively. Long-Term Incentive Plans – Performance Share Awards (Performance Shares) Beginning in 2017, U.S. Cellular granted performance shares, specifically performance stock units, to key employees. The performance shares vest after three years. Each recipient may be entitled to shares of U.S. Cellular common stock equal to 50% to 200% of a communicated target award depending on the achievement of predetermined performance- based operating targets over the performance period, which is a one year period beginning on January 1 in the year of grant to December 31 in the year of grant. The remaining time through the end of the vesting period is considered the ‘‘time-based period’’. Performance-based operating targets include Simple Free Cash Flow, Consolidated Total Operating Revenues and Postpaid Handset Voluntary Defections. Subject to vesting during the time-based period, the performance share award agreement provides that in no event shall the award be less than 50% of the target opportunity as of the grant date. The performance shares awards currently outstanding that were granted in 2017 and 2018 and will vest in 2020 and 2021, respectively. U.S. Cellular estimates the fair value of performance shares using U.S. Cellular’s closing stock price on the date of grant. An estimate of the number of performance shares expected to vest based upon achieving the performance-based operating targets is made and the aggregate fair value is expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Each reporting period, during the performance period, the estimate of the number of performance shares expected to vest is reviewed and stock compensation expense is adjusted as appropriate to reflect the revised estimate of the aggregate fair value of the performance shares expected to vest. A summary of U.S. Cellular’s nonvested performance shares and changes during 2018 is presented in the table below: Common Performance Shares Nonvested at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in units based on approved performance factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonvested at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 36.92 38.81 36.92 37.37 37.78 Number 342,000 357,000 111,000 (42,000) 768,000 $ $ $ $ $ No performance shares vested during 2018 or 2017. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of the performance shares granted in 2018 and 2017 was $38.81 and $36.92, respectively. Long-Term Incentive Plans – Deferred Compensation Stock Units Certain U.S. Cellular employees may elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of their annual bonuses and to receive a company matching contribution on the amount deferred. All bonus compensation that is deferred by employees electing to participate is immediately vested and is deemed to be invested in U.S. Cellular Common Share stock units. The amount of U.S. Cellular’s matching contribution depends on the portion of the annual bonus that is deferred. Participants receive a 25% match for amounts deferred up to 50% of their total annual bonus and a 33% match for amounts that exceed 50% of their total annual bonus; such matching contributions also are deemed to be invested in U.S. Cellular Common Share stock units and vest over three years. 95 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The total fair value of deferred compensation stock units that vested during 2018, 2017 and 2016 was less than $1 million in each respective year. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of the deferred compensation stock units granted in 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $40.72, $36.02 and $41.31, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, there were 33,000 vested but unissued deferred compensation stock units valued at $2 million. Compensation of Non-Employee Directors U.S. Cellular issued 18,000, 15,000 and 13,000 Common Shares in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, under its Non-Employee Director compensation plan. NOTE 18 BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom are billed for services they receive from TDS, consisting primarily of information processing, accounting and finance, and general management services. Such billings are based on expenses specifically identified to U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom and on allocations of common expenses. Management believes the method used to allocate common expenses is reasonable and that all expenses and costs applicable to U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom are reflected in the accompanying business segment information on a basis that is representative of what they would have been if U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom operated on a stand-alone basis. TDS has re-evaluated internal reporting roles with regard to its HMS business unit and, as a result, has changed its reportable segments. Effective January 1, 2018, HMS is no longer reported under TDS Telecom, but is reported as a part of Corporate, Eliminations and Other. Prior periods have been recast to conform to the revised presentation. Financial data for TDS’ reportable segments for 2018, 2017 and 2016, is as follows. See Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements for additional information. TDS Telecom Year ended or as of December 31, 20181 (Dollars in millions) Operating revenues U.S. Cellular Wireline Cable TDS Corporate, Telecom Eliminations Total2 and Other Total Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equipment and product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,978 $ 989 697 $ 2 230 $ – Total operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,967 Cost of services (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense reported below) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of equipment and products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense (benefit)3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add back: Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense (benefit)3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 758 1,031 1,388 640 10 (18) 158 159 15 (116) (1) 215 51 164 640 10 (18) 116 51 699 266 1 197 142 (3) – 95 – 7 2 3 106 142 (3) – (2) 230 104 – 57 69 1 – (2) – 1 – – (1) 69 1 – – Adjusted EBITDA4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 963 $ 243 $ 70 $ 925 2 927 369 1 254 212 (2) – 93 – 8 2 2 105 16 89 212 (2) – (2) 16 313 Investments in unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 441 $ 7,274 $ 515 $ 4 $ 1,304 $ 176 $ – $ 639 $ 56 $ 4 1,934 232 96 $ $ 96 119 215 79 98 52 31 1 – (46) 1 3 (58) 1 (99) (21) (78) 31 1 – 58 (21) (9) 35 575 20 $ $ $ $ 3,999 1,110 5,109 1,206 1,130 1,694 883 9 (18) 205 160 26 (172) 2 221 46 175 883 9 (18) 172 46 $ $ $ $ 1,267 480 9,783 767 TDS Corporate, Telecom Eliminations and Other Total $ $ $ $ $ 84 152 235 77 122 29 34 (108) 1 – – 80 – 2 (57) 1 25 21 4 34 (108) 1 – – 57 21 9 34 557 24 $ 3,979 1,065 5,044 1,164 1,195 1,689 844 262 21 (1) (22) (108) 137 15 (170) 4 (122) (279) 157 844 262 21 (1) (22) 170 (279) $ $ $ $ 1,152 453 9,295 694 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TDS Telecom Year ended or as of December 31, 2017 Cellular Wireline Cable U.S. Total2 (Dollars in millions) Operating revenues Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equipment and product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,978 $ 912 713 $ 1 Total operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,890 Cost of services (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense reported below) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of equipment and products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on impairment of goodwill6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on sale of business and other exit costs, net . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense (benefit)3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add back: Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on impairment of goodwill6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on sale of business and other exit costs, net . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense (benefit)3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 732 1,071 1,412 615 370 17 (1) (22) (304) 137 8 (113) – (272) (287) 15 615 370 17 (1) (22) 113 (287) 714 258 2 194 151 – 1 – – 108 – 5 – 3 117 151 – 1 – – – 206 $ – 206 98 – 54 44 – 2 – – 8 – – – – 8 44 – 2 – – – Adjusted EBITDA4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 820 $ 269 $ 54 $ 917 1 919 355 2 248 195 – 3 – – 116 – 5 – 3 125 (13) 138 195 – 3 – – – (13) 323 Investments in unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 415 $ 6,841 $ 469 $ 4 $ 1,260 $ 146 $ – $ 644 $ 55 $ 4 1,897 201 97 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TDS Telecom TDS Corporate, Telecom Eliminations Year ended or as of December 31, 2016 Cellular Wireline Cable U.S. Total2 (Dollars in millions) Operating revenues Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equipment and product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,081 $ 909 696 $ 2 185 $ – Total operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,990 698 185 Cost of services (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense reported below) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of equipment and products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on sale of business and other exit costs, net . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense (benefit)3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add back: Depreciation, amortization and accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on sale of business and other exit costs, net . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense (benefit)3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 760 1,081 1,480 618 22 – (19) 48 140 6 (113) 1 82 33 49 618 22 – (19) 113 33 258 2 200 159 2 – (1) 77 – 3 1 3 83 159 2 – (1) (1) 94 – 51 37 2 – – 2 – – – – 2 37 2 – – – Adjusted EBITDA4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 816 $ 242 $ 41 $ 880 2 882 352 2 250 196 4 – (1) 79 – 3 1 3 85 32 54 196 4 – (1) (1) 32 283 Investments in unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 413 $ 7,110 $ 446 $ 4 $ 1,229 $ 108 $ – $ 599 $ 54 $ 4 1,831 162 and Other Total $ $ $ $ $ 89 194 283 77 157 32 36 1 (1) – (19) – 2 (58) (1) (75) (25) (51) 36 1 (1) – 58 (25) 19 34 505 22 $ 4,050 1,105 5,155 1,189 1,240 1,762 850 27 (1) (20) 108 140 11 (170) 3 92 40 52 850 27 (1) (20) 170 40 $ $ $ $ 1,118 451 9,446 630 Numbers may not foot due to rounding. 1 As of January 1, 2018, TDS adopted ASU 2014-09 using a modified retrospective approach. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented. As a result, 2018 amounts include the impacts of ASU 2014-09, but prior periods remain as previously reported, except as specifically stated. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition for additional information. 2 TDS Telecom Total includes eliminations between the Wireline and Cable segments. 3 Income tax expense (benefit) is not provided at the individual segment level for Wireline and Cable. TDS calculates income tax expense for ‘‘TDS Telecom Total’’. 4 Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and accretion (Adjusted EBITDA) is a segment measure reported to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of making decisions about allocating resources to the segments and assessing their performance. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income, adjusted for the items set forth in the reconciliation above. TDS believes Adjusted EBITDA is a useful measure of TDS’ operating results before significant recurring non-cash charges, gains and losses, and other items as presented above as they provide additional relevant and useful information to investors and other users of TDS’ financial data in evaluating the effectiveness of its operations and underlying business trends in a manner that is consistent with management’s evaluation of business performance. 5 ASU 2017-07, regarding net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost was adopted as of January 1, 2018, and applied retrospectively. All prior year numbers have been recast to conform to this standard. 6 During 2017, U.S. Cellular recorded a goodwill impairment of $370 million while TDS recorded a goodwill impairment of the U.S. Cellular reporting unit of $227 million. Prior to 2009, TDS accounted for U.S. Cellular’s share repurchases as step acquisitions, allocating a portion of the share repurchase value to TDS’ Goodwill. Further, goodwill of the U.S. Cellular reporting unit was impaired at the TDS level in 2003 but not at U.S. Cellular. Consequently, U.S. 98 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Cellular’s goodwill on a stand-alone basis and any resulting impairments of goodwill does not equal the TDS consolidated goodwill related to U.S. Cellular. The TDS adjustment of $143 million is included in ‘‘Corporate, Eliminations and Other.’’ During 2017, TDS also recorded a goodwill impairment of $35 million related to its HMS operations included in ‘‘Corporate, Eliminations and Other.’’ For further information on the goodwill impairment see Note 7 — Intangible Assets. NOTE 19 SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES Following are supplemental cash flow disclosures regarding interest paid and income taxes paid. Year Ended December 31, (Dollars in millions) 2018 2017 2016 Interest paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes paid, net of refunds received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 168 40 $ 167 56 168 (39) Following are supplemental cash flow disclosures regarding transactions related to stock-based compensation awards. In certain situations, TDS and U.S. Cellular withhold shares that are issuable upon the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted shares to cover, and with a value equivalent to, the exercise price and/or the amount of taxes required to be withheld from the stock award holder at the time of the exercise or vesting. TDS and U.S. Cellular then pay the amount of the required tax withholdings to the taxing authorities in cash. TDS: Year Ended December 31, (Dollars in millions) 2018 2017 2016 Common Shares withheld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aggregate value of Common Shares withheld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 676,364 21 $ 120,560 3 $ 126,747 4 $ Cash receipts upon exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash disbursements for payment of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 (6) 7 (3) Net cash receipts from exercise of stock options and vesting of other stock awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 42 $ 4 $ 13 (4) 9 U.S. Cellular: Year Ended December 31, (Dollars in millions) 2018 2017 2016 Common Shares withheld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aggregate value of Common Shares withheld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,549,800 73 $ 144,755 6 $ 308,010 13 $ Cash receipts upon exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash disbursements for payment of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 (11) 5 (4) Net cash receipts from exercise of stock options and vesting of other stock awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18 $ 1 $ 12 (6) 6 NOTE 20 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS The following persons are partners of Sidley Austin LLP, the principal law firm of TDS and its subsidiaries: Walter C.D. Carlson, a trustee and beneficiary of a voting trust that controls TDS, the non-executive Chairman of the Board and member of the Board of Directors of TDS and a director of U.S. Cellular, a subsidiary of TDS; William S. DeCarlo, the General Counsel of TDS and an Assistant Secretary of TDS and certain subsidiaries of TDS; and Stephen P. Fitzell, the General Counsel of U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom and an Assistant Secretary of certain subsidiaries of TDS. Walter C.D. Carlson does not provide legal services to TDS or its subsidiaries. TDS, U.S. Cellular and their subsidiaries incurred legal costs from Sidley Austin LLP of $10 million, $11 million and $9 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of TDS is responsible for the review and evaluation of all related-party transactions as such term is defined by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. 99 REPORTS OF MANAGEMENT Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements Management of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. has the responsibility for preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements and for their integrity and objectivity. The statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, in management’s opinion, were fairly presented. The financial statements included amounts that were based on management’s best estimates and judgments. Management also prepared the other information in the annual report and is responsible for its accuracy and consistency with the financial statements. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and has expressed herein its unqualified opinion on these financial statements. /s/ LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) /s/ Anita J. Kroll Anita J. Kroll Vice President and Controller /s/ Douglas W. Chambers Douglas W. Chambers Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) 100 REPORTS OF MANAGEMENT Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. TDS’ internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). TDS’ internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and, where required, the Board of Directors of the issuer; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the interim or annual consolidated financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Under the supervision and with the participation of TDS’ management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, TDS conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on the criteria established in the 2013 version of Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Management has concluded that TDS maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in the 2013 version of Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The effectiveness of TDS’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in the firm’s report included herein. /s/ LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) /s/ Anita J. Kroll Anita J. Kroll Vice President and Controller /s/ Douglas W. Chambers Douglas W. Chambers Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) 101 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.: Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries (‘‘the Company’’) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the ‘‘consolidated financial statements’’). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO. We did not audit the financial statements of Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, a 5.5% equity investment of the Company, which is reflected in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as an equity method investment of $262,100,000 and $244,400,000 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and income from equity investments of $76,900,000, $66,200,000 and $71,400,000 for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018. The financial statements of Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership were audited by other auditors whose report thereon has been furnished to us, and our opinion on the financial statements expressed herein, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, is based solely on the report of the other auditors. Change in Accounting Principle As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for revenues from contracts with customers in 2018. Basis for Opinions The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. 102 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chicago, Illinois February 22, 2019 We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002. 103 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA Year Ended or at December 31, 20181 2017 2016 2015 2014 (Dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts) Statement of Operations data Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on impairment of goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on sale of business and other exit costs, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . Operating income (loss)2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) attributable to TDS shareholders . Net income (loss) available to common shareholders Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to TDS shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to TDS shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends per Common and Series A Common Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance Sheet data Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net long-term debt, excluding current portion . . . . . Total TDS shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,109 — $ 5,044 262 $ 5,155 — $ 5,210 — $ 5,018 88 — (18) 205 46 175 40 135 135 1.20 1.17 0.64 9,783 2,418 4,560 $ $ $ $ $ $ (1) (22) (108) (279) 157 4 153 153 1.39 1.37 0.62 9,295 2,437 4,269 $ $ $ $ $ $ (1) (20) 108 40 52 9 43 43 0.39 0.39 0.59 9,446 2,433 4,144 $ $ $ $ $ $ (136) (147) 427 172 263 44 219 218 2.02 1.98 0.56 9,422 2,440 4,126 $ $ $ $ $ $ (16) (113) (185) (5) (147) (11) (136) (136) (1.26) (1.26) 0.54 8,854 1,941 3,926 $ $ $ $ $ $ 1 As of January 1, 2018, TDS adopted ASU 2014-09 using a modified retrospective approach. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented. As a result, 2018 amounts include the impacts of ASU 2014-09, but prior periods remain as previously reported, except as specifically stated. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition for additional information. 2 ASU 2017-07, regarding net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost was adopted as of January 1, 2018, and applied retrospectively. All prior year numbers have been recast to conform to this standard. 104 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) 20181 March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 Quarter Ended (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to TDS shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders . . . . Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders . . . 2017 (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on impairment of goodwill2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on asset disposals, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss)3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense (benefit)4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) attributable to TDS shareholders . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to TDS shareholders . Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to TDS shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,225 2 (7) 80 24 57 39 0.35 0.34 $ $ $ 1,255 2 (11) 61 21 44 33 0.30 0.29 $ $ $ 1,297 — — 51 5 53 46 0.41 0.41 $ $ $ 1,332 5 — 13 (2) 20 16 0.14 0.14 Quarter Ended March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 1,238 — 4 (17) 81 34 43 37 0.34 0.33 $ $ $ 1,247 — 6 (2) 27 10 12 10 0.09 0.09 $ $ $ 1,251 262 6 — (233) (5) (231) (181) (1.64) (1.64) $ $ $ 1,308 — 5 (3) 16 (319) 334 287 2.59 2.54 Due to rounding, the sum of quarterly results may not equal the total for the year. 1 As of January 1, 2018, TDS adopted ASU 2014-09 using a modified retrospective approach. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented. As a result, 2018 amounts include the impacts of ASU 2014-09, but prior periods remain as previously reported, except as specifically stated. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition for additional information. 2 See Note 7 — Intangible Assets for additional information on Loss on impairment of goodwill. 3 ASU 2017-07, regarding net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost was adopted as of January 1, 2018, and applied retrospectively. All prior year numbers have been recast to conform to this standard. 4 In December 2017, the Tax Act was enacted. The Tax Act reduced the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%. See Note 5 — Income Taxes for additional information. 105 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION Stock and Dividend Information TDS’ Common Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ‘‘TDS.’’ As of January 31, 2019, the last trading day of the month, TDS Common Shares were held by 1,223 record owners, and the Series A Common Shares were held by 68 record owners. TDS has paid cash dividends on its common stock since 1974, and paid dividends of $0.64 per Common and Series A Common Share during 2018. During 2017, TDS paid dividends of $0.62 per Common and Series A Common Share. The Common Shares of United States Cellular Corporation, an 82%-owned subsidiary of TDS, are listed on the NYSE under the symbol ‘‘USM.’’ Stock Performance Graph The following chart provides a comparison of TDS’ cumulative total return to shareholders (stock price appreciation plus dividends) during the previous five years to the returns of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Price Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Telecommunications Index. Telephone & Data Systems, Inc. S&P 500 Index Dow Jones U.S. Telecommunications Index $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 28FEB201903035302 2018 Note: Cumulative total return assumes reinvestment of dividends. Telephone and Data Systems Common Shares (NYSE: TDS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S&P 500 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dow Jones U.S. Telecommunications Index . . . . . . . . . $ 100 100 100 $ 100.02 113.69 102.39 $ 104.70 115.26 105.99 $ 119.29 129.05 131.38 $ 117.64 157.22 131.02 $ 140.68 150.33 122.20 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 The comparison above assumes $100.00 invested at the close of trading on the last trading day preceding the first day of 2013, in TDS Common Shares, S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Telecommunications Index. Dividend Reinvestment Plan TDS’ dividend reinvestment plans provide its common shareholders with a convenient and economical way to participate in the future growth of TDS. Holders of record of ten (10) or more Common Shares may purchase Common Shares with their reinvested dividends at a five percent discount from market price. Common Shares may also be purchased on a monthly basis through optional cash payments by participants in this plan. The initial ten (10) shares cannot be purchased directly from TDS. An authorization card and prospectus will be mailed automatically by the transfer agent to all registered record holders with ten (10) or more shares. Once enrolled in the plan, there are no brokerage commissions or service charges for purchases made under the plan. 106 TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION Investor relations TDS’ annual report, SEC filings and news releases are available to investors, securities analysts and other members of the investment community. These reports are provided, without charge, upon request to our Investor Relations department at the address below. Investors may also access these and other reports through the Investor Relations portion of the TDS website (www.tdsinc.com). Questions regarding lost, stolen or destroyed certificates, consolidation of accounts, transferring of shares and name or address changes should be directed to: Julie Mathews, IRC, Director — Investor Relations Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. 30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 4000 Chicago, IL 60602 312.592.5341 julie.mathews@tdsinc.com General inquiries by investors, securities analysts and other members of the investment community should be directed to: Jane W. McCahon, Senior Vice President — Corporate Relations and Corporate Secretary Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. 30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 4000 Chicago, IL 60602 312.592.5379 jane.mccahon@tdsinc.com Directors and executive officers See ‘‘Election of Directors’’ and ‘‘Executive Officers’’ sections of the Proxy Statement issued in 2019 for the 2019 Annual Meeting. Principal counsel Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, Illinois Transfer agent Computershare Trust Company, N.A. 462 South 4th Street, Suite 1600 Louisville, KY 40202 312.360.5326 Independent registered public accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Visit TDS’ web site at www.tdsinc.com 107 (This page has been left blank intentionally.) (This page has been left blank intentionally.) (This page has been left blank intentionally.) OfficersWalter C. D. Carlson Chairman of the Board (non-executive) Partner - Sidley Austin LLP Chairman - Corporate Governance and Nominating CommitteeLeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer Chairman - Technology Advisory Group Member - Corporate Governance and Nominating CommitteeJames W. Butman President and Chief Executive Officer - TDS TelecomLetitia G. Carlson, MD Physician and Associate Clinical Professor - George Washington University Medical CenterPrudence E. Carlson Private InvestorClarence A. Davis Former Director and Chief Executive Officer - Nestor, Inc. Member - Audit CommitteeKimberly D. Dixon Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer - FedEx Office Member - Compensation Committee Member - Technology Advisory GroupBoard of DirectorsKenneth R. Meyers President and Chief Executive Officer - U.S. CellularGeorge W. Off Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer - Checkpoint Systems, Inc. Chairman - Audit Committee Member - Compensation Committee Member - Technology Advisory GroupChristopher D. O´Leary Senior Advisor at KKR Partner - Twin Ridge Capital Management Member - Audit Committee Chairman - Compensation Committee Member - Technology Advisory GroupMitchell H. Saranow Chairman - The Saranow Group, LLC Member - Audit Committee Member - Corporate Governance and Nominating CommitteeGary L. Sugarman Managing Member - Richfield Capital Partners Principal - Richfield Associates, Inc. Member - Compensation CommitteeLeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. President and Chief Executive OfficerDouglas W. Chambers Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Accounting OfficerDaniel J. Dewitt Senior Vice President - Human ResourcesJoseph R. Hanley Senior Vice President - Technology, Services and Strategy Jane W. McCahon Senior Vice President - Corporate Relations and Corporate SecretaryPeter L. Sereda Senior Vice President - FinanceKurt B. Thaus Senior Vice President and Chief Information OfficerScott H. Williamson Senior Vice President - Acquisitions and Corporate DevelopmentMichelle M. Brukwicki Vice President - Financial Analysis and Strategic PlanningDavid D. Gillman Vice President - TaxBob L. Gleisner Chief Financial Officer - OneNeck IT SolutionsKenneth M. Kotylo Vice President - Acquisitions and Corporate DevelopmentAnita J. Kroll Vice President and ControllerLaurie A. Ruchti Vice President - IT Strategy, Quality and Application ServicesPeter D. Taft Vice President - StrategyJohn M. Toomey Vice President and TreasurerThomas S. Weber Vice President - Internal AuditTheodore E. Wiessing Vice President - IT Operational Services and Chief Security & Privacy OfficerStephen P. Fitzell General Counsel and Assistant Secretary1485_TDS_Cover.indd 33/21/19 2:39 PMTelephone and Data Systems, Inc. 30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 4000 Chicago, IL 60602 Tel: 312.630.1900 www.tdsinc.comAt TDS, our mission is to provide outstanding communications services to our customers and meet the needs of our shareholders, our people, and our communities. About Our BusinessesU.S. Cellular Provides outstanding wireless experiences to nearly five million customers, with a high-quality network and competitive devices, plans, and pricing.TDS Telecom Provides high-quality residential broadband, video, and voice services, and commercial VoIP (managedIP) phone and dedicated broadband services. TDS Telecom also manages the operations of: BendBroadband Offers an extensive range of broadband, fiber connectivity, cable TV, and voice services for residential and commercial customers. OneNeck IT Solutions Delivers hybrid IT solutions, including cloud and hosting solutions, managed services, enterprise application management, professional services, IT hardware, and top tier data centers. Telephone and Data Systems headquarters, ChicagoU.S. Cellular operationsWireline operationsCable operationsHMS operationsTelephone and Data Systems headquarters, ChicagoU.S. Cellular operationsWireline operationsCable operationsHMS operations1485_TDS_Cover.indd43/21/193:05PM

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above