Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Investment - Banking & Investment Services / Temple Bar Investment Trust PLC

Temple Bar Investment Trust PLC

tmpl · LSE Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker tmpl
Exchange LSE
Sector Financial Services
Industry Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Employees 1-10
← All annual reports
FY2015 Annual Report · Temple Bar Investment Trust PLC
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
T
e
m
p
e
B
a
r

l

I

n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
T
r
u
s
t
P
L
C

A
n
n
u
a

l

R
e
p
o
r
t

i

&
F
n
a
n
c

i

a

l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
2
0
1
5

ANNUAL REPORT & FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Temple Bar Investment Trust’s investment objective is to 
provide growth in income and capital to achieve a long term 
total return greater than the benchmark FTSE All-Share 
Index, through investment primarily in UK securities. The 
Company’s policy is to invest in a broad spread of securities 
with typically the majority of the portfolio selected from the 
constituents of the FTSE 350 Index.

CONTENTS

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE REPORT

FINANCIAL REPORT

1  Summary of results

18   Directors

36   Statement of 

SHAREHOLDER 
INFORMATION

2  Chairman’s statement

19   Report of Directors

3  Ten year record

22   Report on directors’ 

4  Manager’s review

10   Attribution analysis

11   Overview of strategy

16   Portfolio of investments

remuneration

24   Corporate governance

27   Report of the audit 

committee

29   Statement of directors’ 

responsibilities

30   Independent auditor’s 

report

Comprehensive Income

51   Notice of meeting

37   Statement of Changes 

in Equity

38   Statement of Financial 

Position

39   Statement of 
Cash Flows

40   Notes to the Financial 

Statements

55   Useful information 
for shareholders

56   Management and 
administration

57  Glossary of terms

59   Temple Bar Investment 
Trust Savings Scheme

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLC
Annual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Assets as at 31 December

Net assets

Ordinary Shares

Net asset value per share with debt at book value

Net asset value per share with debt at market value

Market price

(Discount)/premium with debt at book value

(Discount)/premium with debt at market value

Revenue for the year ended 31 December

Revenue return attributable to ordinary shareholders

Revenue return per ordinary share

Dividends per ordinary share – interim and proposed final

Capital for the year ended 31 December

Capital return attributable to ordinary shareholders

Capital return attributable per ordinary share

Net gearing*

Ongoing charges**

Total Returns for the year to 31 December 2015

Return on share price

Return on net assets

Return on gross assets

Return on FTSE All-share Index

Change in Retail Prices Index over year

Dividend Yields (Net) as at 31 December 2015

Yield on ordinary share price (1,052p)***

Yield on FTSE All-Share Index

2015 
£000

2014 
£000

% 
change

755,755

799,444

1,130.14p

1,115.46p

1,052.00p

(6.9%)

(5.6%)

26,663

39.87p

39.66p

(38,877)

(58.14p)

3.8%

0.49%

1,195.47p

1,174.37p

1,191.00p

(0.4%)

1.4%

25,782

39.82p

38.88p

(36,813)

(56.86p)

0.0%

0.48%

(5.5)

(5.5)

(5.0)

(11.7)

2.0

(7.9%)

(1.0%)

(0.7%)

1.0%

1.2%

3.8%

3.7%

* Defined as total assets less cash or cash equivalents (including gilt holdings) by shareholders' funds expressed as a percentage.
**  Defined as the total of the investment management fee and administrative expenses divided by the average cum income net asset value throughout the year. 
***  Based on the three interim dividends paid during the year together with the recommended final dividend for the year.

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

Ordinary Shares  

9.875% Debenture Stock 2017  

5.5% Debenture Stock 2021  

66,872,765

£25,000,000

£38,000,000

4.05% Private Placement Loan 2028  

£50,000,000

VOTING STRUCTURE

Ordinary shares 100%

BENCHMARK
Performance is measured  
against the FTSE All-Share Index.

TOTAL ASSETS LESS  

CURRENT LIABILITIES

£869,535,000

TOTAL EQUITY*

£755,755,000

MARKET CAPITALISATION

£703,501,000

* With debenture and loan stocks at book value

1

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONCHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT

The Company’s portfolio is constructed to deliver both capital and income  
growth. The portfolio manager remains fully focussed on identifying good  
quality companies with attractive yields and run by strong management teams.

PERFORMANCE

The year under review has seen a continuation of volatile 
markets together with conditions generally unfavourable 
for Temple Bar’s value oriented investment approach. The 
total return on net assets of Temple Bar in 2015 was -1.0% 
which compares with a total return for the FTSE All Share 
Index of 1.0%. It is always disappointing when the Trust 
endures periods of underperformance but this is a natural 
consequence of our chosen investment style which very  
much favours a longer term standpoint. Temple Bar  
continues to outperform its benchmark over both five  
and ten year periods.

The Company’s portfolio is constructed to deliver both capital 
and income growth. The portfolio manager remains fully 
focussed on identifying good quality companies with attractive 
yields and run by strong management teams. Sometimes such 
companies are under-appreciated by the market for various 
reasons and accordingly offer value to a long term, patient 
investor. The benefits of this approach are reflected in  
Temple Bar’s returns over longer time periods.

The main themes leading to the recent underperformance 
of the NAV relative to the benchmark index are set out in 
the Manager’s Review together with some of the positive 
and negative contributors to performance at an individual 
investment level during the year.

DIVIDEND

This is the first year in which the Company has paid  
dividends on a quarterly basis, a change implemented on  
our understanding of shareholder preference. There have 
already been three interim dividend payments of 7.93p 
per share and the directors are now recommending a final 
dividend of 15.87p per share to be paid on 31 March 2016  
to those shareholders on the register as at 11 March 2016. 
The ex-dividend date for this payment is 10 March 2016.  
If approved, this would give a total dividend of 39.66p, 
an increase for the year as a whole of 2% and the 32nd 
consecutive year in which the Company has increased  
its annual dividend payment.

GEARING 

The Company was only moderately geared at the year end, 
its long term borrowings largely matched by the relatively 
high cash and near cash position on the portfolio. At the year 
end, gearing (calculated net of cash and related liquid assets, 
including our investment in a UK short dated gilt) was 3.8%. 
The Manager is only prepared to invest the available funds 
when he considers that suitable opportunities are available. 
This has generally not been the case in the recent past.

SHARE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

For large parts of 2013–14 the Company’s shares were 
trading at a premium to net asset value and it was therefore 
able to issue new shares to market participants. Throughout 
the majority of 2015 the Company’s shares have traded at a 
modest discount to their net asset value; consequently it has 
not been possible to issue new shares. While there were also 
no share repurchases during the year, the Board is prepared 
to undertake such action, subject to market conditions, if 
the discount widens both in absolute terms and relative to 
the Company’s peer group, as part of a proactive approach 
to discount/premium management. The Board recommends 
that the existing authorities to issue new ordinary shares and 
to repurchase shares in the market for cancellation or to hold 
in Treasury be continued. Accordingly it is seeking approval 
from shareholders to renew the share issue and repurchase 
authorities at the forthcoming annual general meeting.

2

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 201532nd consecutive year in which the Company has 
increased its annual dividend payment.

THE BOARD

OUTLOOK

As mentioned in the half year report, we were pleased 
to welcome to the Board during the year Lesley Sherratt, 
who is already making a positive contribution to Board 
discussion. We were also sorry to lose the services of  
Martin Riley, for health reasons, after 10 years of  
excellent service on the Board.

In common with best practice, all directors are subject 
to annual re-election by shareholders. I refer you to the 
directors’ biographies on page 18 for further details.  
Every year the Board undertakes a formal and rigorous 
evaluation of each director including myself as Chairman.

There is no getting away from the fact that the last few  
years have been an uncomfortable time for committed 
adherents of the value investing approach. While in 
relative terms our portfolio has suffered as a consequence, 
investment is a long term matter and I am reassured that 
many of our shareholders appear to understand this. They 
appreciate that the value investment style is inherently 
cyclical but that, if one is patient and adheres to this 
approach, eventually some great opportunities will arise. 
Clearly we hope that this occurs sooner rather than later  
but if needs be we will remain patient before investing  
any of the surplus cash currently held on the portfolio.

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

The AGM will be held at Woolgate Exchange, 25 Basinghall 
Street, London EC2V 5HA on 30 March 2016 at 11am. In 
addition to the formal business of the meeting the portfolio 
manager, Alastair Mundy, will, as usual, make a presentation 
reviewing the past year and commenting on the outlook.  
He will also be available to answer questions alongside  
the directors. Shareholders who are unable to attend  
the meeting are encouraged to use their proxy votes.

John Reeve
Chairman

23 February 2016

TEN YEAR RECORD

Total assets less  
current liabilities (£000)

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

598,485

557,712

422,408

553,392

603,444

585,480

664,648

905,775

913,198

869,535

Net assets (£000)

535,128

494,340

359,020

489,988

540,022

522,040

601,191

792,070

799,444

755,755

Net assets per  
ordinary share (pence)

Revenue return to ordinary 
shareholders (£000)

Revenue return  
per share (pence)

Dividends per share* (pence)

917.25

847.33

612.76

831.03

915.89

874.42

992.86 1,250.84 1,195.47 1,130.14

17,620

19,361

20,614

20,017

18,915

22,552

24,873

22,274

25,782

26,663

30.20

29.23

33.19

30.98

35.33

32.84

33.98

33.50

32.08

34.20

38.08

35.23

41.39

36.65

36.17

37.75

39.82

38.88

39.87

39.66

* Interim(s) and proposed final for the year

3

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONMANAGER’S REVIEW

Over the year, the FTSE All-Share Index, the index most 
relevant to the Temple Bar portfolio, generated a total  
return of 1.0% while the FTSE 250 Index returned 11.2%  
and the FTSE Smaller Companies Index delivered 9.2%.  
This compares with a total return for Temple Bar of -1.0%. 

The FTSE 250 has now outperformed the FTSE 100 for the 
fourth year in a row and for six of the last seven years. Over 
the longer term the performance differential is extraordinary,  
as evidenced by the adjacent graph, and there are very  
few conventional broadly spread investments that a  
sterling-based UK investor could have made 10 years  
ago that would have performed as well. 

It is sometimes painful being a value investor. We buy stocks 
that are out of favour. If they fall further, we risk excoriation 
for ignoring the ‘obvious’ negative factors. Fortunately, 
history informs us that the valuation discount received 
from buying into such negativity typically rewards a patient 
investor. The current stage of the market cycle is one of  
those demanding such patience.

Total Return of FTSE 250 relative to FTSE 100

160

140

120

100

80

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream

The most sought after stocks in the UK market last year were 
‘quality compounders’; companies operating in areas with 
high barriers to entry (‘a moat’), generating high returns 
on equity and using some of these returns to drive future 
profits growth. In short, those companies most attractive 
to investors employing an investment style akin to that 
of Warren Buffett. Although Mr Buffett has generated 
astonishing long term returns using this approach, he has 
made it look rather easier than is the case. Many stocks 
once regarded as high quality tend to disappoint ultimately, 
through a process of mean reversion, thus making it risky 
to pay a high price for them. And even Mr Buffett has 
sometimes experienced periods of great discomfort; the 
Berkshire Hathaway price has fallen more than 40% on two 
occasions while under his stewardship. The most intuitively 
appealing investment processes can also have their times in 
the shade.

Many of the weakest stocks and sectors in 2015 were those 
that had been poor in 2014. Resource related stocks, banks, 
and food retailers took the brunt of the pain. In summary, 
2015 was a year to stick with one’s winners. 

ALASTAIR MUNDY 

Alastair is head of the Value Team at Investec Asset 
Management having joined in 2000 from Morley  
Fund Management. 

In addition to Temple Bar Investment Trust, Alastair 
manages a number of funds including the Investec 
Cautious Managed Fund and the Investec UK Special 
Situations Fund. 

Alastair graduated from City University in 1988 with a 
Bachelor of Science degree in Actuarial Science.

4

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015Many of the weakest stocks and sectors in 2015 were those 
that had been poor in 2014. Resource-related stocks, banks, 
and food retailers took the brunt of the pain.

With these themes in mind, many of the most significant 
positive contributors on the portfolio in 2015 had also 
performed well in 2014: Direct Line, Carnival, CRH 
and Kingspan all progressed well. Being significantly 
underweight to the mining sector also assisted 
performance relative to our benchmark index. 

At the other end of the scale, the most expensive 
detractors from performance were Drax, Royal Bank of 
Scotland, Avon Products, Joy Global and Vallourec, all 
affected by weak trading and, in the case of the latter 
three, by deteriorating balance sheets. 

We were attracted to Joy Global, a manufacturer of 
mining equipment, and Vallourec, a manufacturer of 
steel pipes, primarily for the oil industry, by their strong 
market positions and impressive long term returns. Having 
analysed a number of UK listed alternatives we selected 
these overseas listed companies as a way of building our 
exposure to the resources industry believing that, in the 
long term, suppliers to these industries are placed to 
make superior returns to those of the resource producers. 
However, both companies have encountered extraordinarily 
tough operating conditions and investor sentiment has 
been badly damaged. Drax owns the most efficient coal-
fired electricity generators in the UK and is also the biggest 
generator of electricity from biomass. It has been badly 
affected by the fall in oil price, making electricity generated 
from gas cheaper, as well as by a reduction in government 
sponsored renewables subsidies and an aggressive UK 
government policy towards coal. Avon Products continued 
to be hurt by its large exposure to weakening emerging 
markets whilst sentiment towards the Royal Bank of 
Scotland was affected by continued fines and no clear  
news as to when dividends would be reinstated.

PORTFOLIO ACTIVITY 

A number of the disposals on the portfolio in the last year 
have been of stocks that have performed well, but whose 
valuations now look full: BT, Carnival, Kingspan and Unilever, 
the latter disposed of in its entirety. Our sales are typically 
made when shares stand at, or slightly above, our estimate 
of their fair value; thus we often find ourselves selling into 
the positive newsflow that attracts the attention of investors 
more eager to extrapolate this information. 

At certain times, 1999 and 2007 come to mind, it would have 
been better to leave the portfolio untouched during the 
course of the year and 2015 was another of those occasions. 
Purchases of stocks such as Vallourec, Joy Global, Standard 
Chartered, Drax and Centrica proved to be far too early in a 
deteriorating environment. 

We cannot say that the bad news is over for our recent 
purchases, but they are already discounting a fair degree 
of negative news. On the other hand, we believe a lot of 
companies in the market are trading at prices which leave 
little in their valuations for disappointment. Rather like the 
two previous periods highlighted, we think we have taken 
the majority of our medicine, particularly relative to the rest 
of the market.

THE OUT OF FAVOUR SECTORS

In terms of sector positioning, the three largest positions  
on the portfolio in both absolute terms and relative to the 
FTSE All-Share are Banks, Oil & Gas, and Industrial Goods  
& Services.

As we highlighted in the interim report, many investors remain 
wary of banks, voicing concerns such as a never-ending list of 
fines, onerous regulation, balance sheet opacity and vulnerability 
to future recessions. While these issues are certainly genuine, it is 
worth considering how conventional wisdom can be opposed. 

PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION %

Temple Bar 

FTSE  

portfolio  

All-Share Index  

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Financials

Oil & Gas

Consumer Services

Consumer Goods

Health Care

Industrials

Telecommunications

Utilities

Basic Materials

10

Technology

Total Equities

11

12

Fixed Interest

Cash

%

26.5

10.2

12.6

16.5

8.8

10.4

5.3

3.8

4.2

1.7

100.00

%

25.1

12.7

9.4

6.4

6.6

14.9

2.9

4.0

6.8

0.8

89.6

9.0

1.4

100.00

12

10

11

9

8

7

6

1

2

5

4

3

5

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONMANAGER’S REVIEW CONTINUED

At certain times, 1999 and 2007 come to mind, it would have 
been better to leave the portfolio untouched during the 
course of the year and 2015 was another of those occasions.

Balance sheets of banks were inarguably weak and opaque 
a decade ago, but much has changed for the better as 
a consequence of rights issues, retained profits, cut or 
suspended dividends and disposals of non-core businesses. 
Clearly regulation has increased, but this is both positive  
and negative. Banks have been stress-tested against – and 
passed - a variety of nasty outcomes, providing investors  
with confidence that future cyclicality may be shallower  
than experienced previously. It is interesting to ponder  
the necessary actions for listed companies in other  
industries if they were to pass similar stress tests.  
While the financial crisis remains fresh in the memory,  
senior bank management will surely remain focused on  
their core business areas in preference to finding novel  
ways of eroding shareholder returns. 

As with any industry, there are many moving parts to 
the investment argument, but perhaps the major factor 
supporting the retention of bank shares is fairly simple. A 
number of constituents of the FTSE 100 Index cut dividends 
in 2015 and, given that a number of dividends remain poorly 
covered, there are likely to be further cuts and omissions 
in the next few years. The UK listed banks we hold, Royal 
Bank of Scotland, Lloyds Banking Group and HSBC have 
modest capital requirements to finance their relatively low 
growth in the future and regulation seems to be easing. 
Therefore, it appears likely that, post regulatory approval, the 
companies will pay out a higher percentage of their earnings 
as dividends.

Over the last two years, the oil price has fallen further than 
virtually all commentators predicted. OPEC has failed, so 
far, to drive sufficient production out of the market at a time 
of relatively weak demand. Perhaps, with the consensus 
believing that the oil price fall was temporary, producers 
were unwilling to leave the market; commentary has now 
turned decidedly negative and consequently may lead to 
the necessary supply actions.

Royal Dutch Shell and BP’s high dividend yields suggest 
investors are highly sceptical about their sustainability. 
We have no great insight regarding these dividends, but 
would argue the low oil price is a once in a generation 
opportunity for these companies properly to consider their 
cost bases and to lock into attractive prices on contracts 
for new developments. As we have commented previously, 
the Armageddon scenario of countries such as Saudi Arabia 
deciding to pump oil as quickly as possible to minimise the 
threat from technological developments is genuine but, 
we think, too early to be concerned with, particularly after 
these exceptionally negative share price movements. 

Food retailers were under continued pressure in 2015 as the 
discounters continued to win market share. Most independent 
forecasts assume that Aldi and Lidl will increase their market 
share from around 10% to 15% over the next five years. This 
is a meaningful amount of market share for other participants 
to relinquish, particularly for an industry in which volumes are 
quite stable and price increases are very reliant on food price 
inflation. However, not all of the constituents of the other 85% 
of market share are necessarily losers. We believe that Tesco, 
with its huge market position and relatively new management, 
can be run more efficiently, focus on areas that the 
discounters do not and cannot, and win back lost customers 
to drive profitability. Meanwhile, Wm Morrison, under new 
management as well, is reversing its confused strategy of 
recent years and has brought a more entrepreneurial approach 
to the business. Its significant freehold property backing, thus 
avoiding rent, also offers a significant competitive advantage.

The very poor performance of the mining sector (the FTSE 
All-Share Mining Index fell 69% over five years relative to a 
36% gain in the FTSE All-Share Index) has obviously attracted 
our attention. The mining bubble inflated enormously almost 
a decade ago and its deflation, although temporarily halted 
by a splurge in government sponsored capital expenditure 
in China, has been equally shocking. A common theory in 
commodity investing is that the commodity price must be 
sufficiently high to incentivise production. If the cost of 
production was stable this would be straightforward but, when 
conditions are most testing, the empirical evidence is that 
producers find ways of reducing costs. Furthermore, demand 
is highly variable, particularly as in the last 15 years a significant 
amount of the growth has come from China. Even if one can 
be comfortable with all these moving parts, to find a sensible 
equilibrium commodity price it is important to consider that 
the fixed costs of production will already have been borne and, 
therefore, it is the marginal costs of production which often 
determine whether the producer keeps mining. And finally for 
investors in mining shares, it is important that the miner has a 
sufficiently strong balance sheet to ensure its survival during 
any particularly elongated periods of low commodity pricing.

Given that a bubble is normally followed by a bust of roughly 
equal proportions that lasts longer than most would expect, 
we have patiently been watching the underperformance of 
the mining sector. As the end of the year approached we 
purchased some Rio Tinto. The company’s low production 
cost status, together with its best in class transport links 
to customers and relatively strong balance sheet provides 
us with some confidence that the company is a long term 
survivor. It is very possible that the mining cycle may 
deteriorate further in the short term and that this could 
impact Rio’s share price and dividend payment; at the end  
of the year Rio had a dividend yield of 7.4%. We would 
envisage building the stock’s position in the portfolio on  
such weakness. 

6

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015Given that a bubble is normally followed by a bust of roughly equal 
proportions that lasts longer than most would expect, we have patiently 
been watching the underperformance of the mining sector.

LESSONS LEARNT

We like, to quote Charlie Munger, to ‘rub our noses in our 
mistakes’ with the objective of becoming better investors. 
However, we know that sometimes our investment style 
does move out of favour and accordingly we should not 
necessarily be hardest on ourselves in our poorest years. 

It is, after all, not unusual for us to hold, and to keep buying, 
shares which fall far beyond their fair value; being early still 
seems a minor guilt. But simply believing one is early can 
blind an investor from the risk or fact that he may be wrong. 

Having watched Avon Products unwind over a number of 
years it is hard to believe there are not lessons to take. As 
a company with a significant amount of turnover in Latin 
America one must accept it has had a tough hand to play. 
Nonetheless, with challenges in many of its operations, 
management should probably have selected their preferred 
operations early and decided to focus. Fighting so many 
fires has proved extremely difficult and could have been  
an indicator to sell earlier.

The acquisitions of Vallourec and Joy Global were clearly 
made too early and we paid insufficient attention to the 
likely size of the bust of the oil and mining bubbles we 
outlined earlier. Sometimes when judging companies, a 
view looking back seven or ten years is most relevant, but 
in these cases we would have minimised the effect of the 
bubble years had we looked over 20 years. Often, this may 
prove impossible given the changes, via acquisitions and 
disposals, companies frequently make. If that is the case, 
sitting on one’s hands may be the preferable option.

Our investments in gold miners have proved particularly 
expensive. The lesson here may be that these companies 
were simply too complex a proposition. The marginal 
cost of production argument mentioned earlier for other 
commodities as a method of price determination is not 
necessarily useful here. Most other commodities are 
consumed after being mined and consequently there is 
limited stock to call on when demand picks up. In contrast, 
gold is not consumed and the stock that exists comprises 
virtually everything that has been mined. Therefore, 
the amount of new production does not really have a 
meaningful effect on price because this flow is so small 
relative to the stock that has been accumulated. The 
operational and balance sheet idiosyncrasies of mining 
companies further increases the challenge. With the gold 
price having fallen significantly in the last few years and, 
having a number of attractions as highlighted later, and with 
gold miners massively out of favour, it seems the wrong time 
to capitulate. We are particularly encouraged that, post a 
number of management changes at these companies, there 
is a far greater focus on efficiency rather than growth. 

In terms of portfolio construction, we have historically taken 
the view that if our portfolio outperforms the index over 
the long term, then outperformance against the average of 
our peers is quite likely and this has proved to be the case. 
However, the last ten years have been very different as many 
of the very largest stocks in the market (banks, miners and 
oils in particular) have performed very poorly indeed and the 
majority of our competitors have been underweight the sum 
of these sectors, to the benefit of their performance. There is 
an argument we should pay less attention to our benchmark 
index and build the portfolio with far more reference to 
our favourite stocks in absolute terms. While this may be 
intuitively superior it does increase the portfolio’s volatility 
against the index so ultimately comes down to how risk and 
performance are best assessed. 

VALUE V GROWTH

The following chart uses Investec Asset Management's 
proprietary system which tracks the success of buying shares 
showing positive momentum versus buying those shares 
which are cheap versus the market on various measures. It 
assesses the factors which drive investment returns in the UK 
stockmarket, illustrating the travails of a value investor. Those 
companies with strong earnings and share price momentum 
have consistently provided the best returns, with other 
valuation factors such as dividend yield or price to book 
value of little attraction. This is not an unusual phenomenon, 
but that does not make it any more comfortable to 
experience. These periods test the mettle of value investors.

150

140

130

120

110

100

90

80

70

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Momentum factor / Valuation factor

Source: Investec Asset Management Limited

I

S
T
R
A
T
E
G
C
R
E
P
O
R
T

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
R
E
P
O
R
T

I

I

F
N
A
N
C
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

S
H
A
R
E
H
O
L
D
E
R

I

N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N

7

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATION 
 
 
 
MANAGER’S REVIEW CONTINUED

This trend has been accompanied by, and probably caused 
by, a long term downward trend in bond yields. Some 
commentators argue that bond yields must reverse for value 
stocks to outperform growth stocks. While higher interest 
rates would probably affect the valuation of growth stocks, 
we believe that lower bond yields could also prove unhelpful. 
After all, these bond yields imply lower economic growth in 
the future, a burden for all companies. 

Of course, when growth investing is in vogue, value 
characteristics lose their potency with investors. Earnings 
downgrades place dividends under pressure and lead to 
queries over the correctness of asset values on balance 
sheets. However, this has always been the case for value 
investors and particularly so near the bottom of the cycle.

DIVIDEND YIELD AND PORTFOLIO CONCENTRATION

The portfolio remains relatively concentrated by number of 
holdings. The mean dividend yield of the UK equity market 
is greater than the median and the number of stocks yielding 
more than the market is the lowest it has been for many years. 

Percentage of UK stocks with a dividend yield above 
the market yield is near all time lows

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

%

6.0

5.0

4.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

2015

% of stocks yielding more than the market (l.h.scale)

FTSE All-Share dividend yield

Source: Société Générale Research

In addition, many of the highest yielding stocks are now 
paying their dividends out of debt and consequently 
these payments are vulnerable. Of course, one should be 
supportive of companies paying their dividends with an 
eye to their long term earnings, provided that these are not 
paid out in preference to essential expenditure in the core 
business. The high dividend yields of a number of stocks 
suggest that shareholders now believe this is the case.

FTSE All-Share dividend cover

MACRO/GOLD

Despite some aggressive monetary policy by the world’s 
largest central banks and a prolonged period of very low 
interest rates, it is striking how deflation and debt, the major 
anxieties of the global financial crisis, remain as significant 
problems as ever. Notwithstanding the increase in short 
term interest rates by the US Federal Reserve at the end 
of the year and the accompanying positive commentary on 
improving economic conditions, markets are not pricing in 
many more increases. Relative to previous economic cycles 
the first rise in interest rates seems to have been left very 
late, leaving in doubt how high they can go. 

A growing risk for a number of economies is that, come the 
next recession, central banks and politicians may be forced 
to find even more experimental ways to kick-start growth. 
Our fear remains that investors may be less than enthusiastic 
about these policies. Consequently, we continue to regard 
gold and gold shares as a bet against the credibility of 
central bankers.

THE FUTURE – A HIGHER EQUITY 
RISK PREMIUM/LOWER P/E?

One of the striking aspects of many companies and industries 
in the stockmarket is the significant change that is occurring 
in their business models and which consequently dissuades 
us from blind faith in a mean reversion cycle. For example, 
banks are unlikely ever to generate the return on equity they 
made in the ten years prior to the global financial crisis due to 
the heightened levels of regulation. Food retailers are dealing 
with the advance of the discounters plus the increased costs of 
on-line delivery and oil companies face an uncertain future as 
renewable technology becomes ever cheaper. Of course, we 
own companies in all these sectors, but at least the issues are 
well aired and, surely to some extent, discounted in share prices. 
What’s more we do not require these companies to return to 
previous levels of profitability to generate capital gains.

We would argue that other sectors, such as media, 
telecommunications and car manufacturers, are also under 
pressure from technological change and/or regulation. Even 
those companies considered beyond criticism, in areas such as 
food manufacturing or beverages, are vulnerable to an increase 
in local competition, such as craft brewers, the expansion in 
discounters selling non-branded items and the potential for 
regulation as, for example, the anti-sugar lobby grows. These 
companies are definitely not priced for any trips or stumbles. 

3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010 2015

Source: Société Générale Research

8

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015The final quarter of the year was, therefore, interesting as 
profit downgrades started to stretch across a broader number 
of sectors, with companies in the UK market warning in areas 
as diverse as the aviation market, the US education market, 
Chinese and US manufacturing and the Polish spirits market. 
It is perhaps interesting to draw parallels between 2015 and 
2008. In 2008, the developed market was beginning to struggle 
as the effects of the financial crisis became more widespread. 
Despite this, many commentators discussed global decoupling, 
claiming that emerging markets were invulnerable to the woes 
of the developed world. This assertion had little substance 
and ultimately emerging markets contained some of the worst 
performing stocks in the bear market. In this cycle, it has been 
the resource stocks and banks which have suffered most, with 
stocks in other industries allegedly protected by their exposure 
to improving economic growth in developed markets and a 
boost generally from a lower oil price. The swathe of fourth 
quarter profit warnings suggests that the pain is spreading 
rather than being contained.

PORTFOLIO CONSTRUCTION

One is therefore left with a fairly stark choice. Ugly stocks, 
with well aired problems, but fairly forgiving valuations, and 
glamour stocks priced for perfection. We think the ugly/
glamour elastic has been stretched too far by investors and 
will snap back at some stage. 

Markets continue to be highly valued and there remain a host 
of uncertainties: the Eurozone continues to wobble, the UK 
referendum vote on EU membership is fairly evenly poised, 
government debt worldwide remains uncomfortably high, 
share buy-backs in the US have been financed in aggregate 
through increases in debt, company profitability remains high 
relative to GDP and valuations of many stocks and sectors 
remain expensive relative to history, the slowdown in the 
Chinese economy continues, the unintended consequences 
of almost a decade of quantitative easing remain unknown 
and new central bank policies might be on the verge of 
introduction. We recognise our disappointing performance 
in recent times and apologise for it, but continue to believe 
that certain parts of the market are significantly overvalued 
and dangerous to investors. We look forward to investing our 
liquid assets when opportunities arise. 

Alastair Mundy
For Investec Fund Managers Limited

23 February 2016

9

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONATTRIBUTION ANALYSIS

By stocks held in the portfolio
Source: Factset

TOP TEN CONTRIBUTORS

%
1
6
.
0

%
5
5
.
0

l

c
P
p
u
o
r

G
n
o
t
f
a
r

G

l

c
P
p
u
o
r

G
e
c
n
a
r
u
s
n

I

e
n

i

L

t
c
e
r
i

D

%
6
4
.
0

V
N
s
s
e
r
p
x
E
T
N
T

%
9
3
.
0

%
8
3
.
0

%
8
3
.
0

l

c
p

l

a
v

i

n
r
a
C

l

c
p
p
u
o
r

G
T
B

l

c
p
p
u
o
r

G
q
i
t
e
n
Q

i

%
2
3
.
0

C
L
P
s
d
n
a
r
B

l

a

i
r
e
p
m

I

%
6
2
.
0

%
5
2
.
0

%
5
2
.
0

l

c
P
r
e
t
n
e
c
a
t
u
p
m
o
C

l

c
p
e
n

i
l

K
h
t
i

m
S
o
x
a
G

l

.
c
.
l
.

p
o
c
c
a
b
o
T
n
a
c

i
r
e
m
A
h
s
i
t
i
r
B

BOTTOM TEN CONTRIBUTORS
%
3
8
.
1
-

%
7
5
.
0
-

c
n

I

l

l

a
b
o
G
y
o
J

%
9
4
.
0
-

l

c
p
P
B

%
0
5
.
0
-

%
0
5
.
0
-

C
L
P
o
c
s
e
T

A
S
c
e
r
u
o

l
l

a
V

%
6
8
.
0
-

%
6
8
.
0
-

l

c
p
p
u
o
r

G
x
a
r

D

l

c
p
p
u
o
r

G
d
n
a

l
t
o
c
S

f
o
k
n
a
B

l

a
y
o
R

B
s
s
a
C
c
P

l

l

l
l

e
h
S

h
c
t
u
D

l

a
y
o
R

%
8
4
.
0
-

%
7
4
.
0
-

c
n

I

,
s
t
c
u
d
o
r
P
n
o
v
A

l

l

i

c
p
s
g
n
d
o
H
C
B
S
H

The bar charts above show the top and bottom contributors to total performance during the year from those stocks 
held in the portfolio.

Relative to the benchmark index
Source: Factset

TOP TEN CONTRIBUTORS

BOTTOM TEN CONTRIBUTORS

%
2
0
.
1

%
2
9
.
0

l

*
c
p
e
r
o
c
n
e
G

l

l

c
P
p
u
o
r

G
e
c
n
a
r
u
s
n

I

e
n

i

L

t
c
e
r
i

D

%
6
6
.
0

l

c
P
p
u
o
r

G
n
o
t
f
a
r

G

%
4
5
.
0

%
4
5
.
0

%
3
5
.
0

%
1
5
.
0

V
N
s
s
e
r
p
x
E
T
N
T

l

*
c
p
n
a
c

i
r
e
m
A
o
g
n
A

l

l

c
p
o
t
n

i

T
o
R

i

l

c
p
p
u
o
r

G
q
i
t
e
n
Q

i

%
7
4
.
0

l

c
P
n
o
t
i
l
l
i

B
P
H
B

%
3
4
.

0

%
2
4
.
0

l

c
p

l

a
v

i

n
r
a
C

l

c
P
r
e
t
n
e
c
a
t
u
p
m
o
C

%
5
5
.
0
-

c
n

I

l

l

a
b
o
G
y
o
J

%
9
4
.
0
-

%
8
4
.
0
-

A
S

c
e
r
u
o

l
l

a
V

c
n

I

,
s
t
c
u
d
o
r
P
n
o
v
A

%
7
3
.
0
-

C
L
P
o
c
s
e
T

%
6
3
.
0
-

l

*
c
p
r
e

l
l
i

M
B
A
S

%
0
7
.
0
-

%
5
6
.
0
-

l

c
p
p
u
o
r

G
x
a
r

D

l

c
p
p
u
o
r

G
d
n
a

l
t
o
c
S

f
o
k
n
a
B

l

a
y
o
R

%
5
3
.
0
-

%
4
3
.
0
-

l

c
p
G
S

I

l

*
c
p
p
u
o
r

G

r
e
s
i

k
c
n
e
B
t
t
i

k
c
e
R

%
5
3
.
0
-

l

c
p
a
c

i
r
t
n
e
C

%
8
2
.

0

-

l

c
p
s
t
e
k
r
a
m
r
e
p
u
S

n
o
s
i
r
r
o
M
m
W

The bar charts above show the top and bottom contributors relative to the performance of the FTSE All-Share Index during the 
year and include the impact of stocks not held in the portfolio. Both positive and negative relative performance can be derived 
from stocks that are not owned by Temple Bar.

* Not held in portfolio

10

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OVERVIEW OF STRATEGY

The directors present the strategic report for the Company 
for the year ended 31 December 2015.

The strategic report is designed to help shareholders assess 
how the directors have performed their duty to promote the 
success of the Company during the year under review.

From time to time fixed interest holdings or non  
equity interests may be held for yield enhancement  
and other purposes. Derivative instruments are used in 
certain circumstances, and with the prior approval of 
the Board, for hedging purposes or to exploit specific 
investment opportunities.

BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY

Temple Bar Investment Trust PLC was incorporated 
in England and Wales in 1926 with the registered  
number 214601.

The Company carries on business as an investment company 
under Section 833 of the Companies Act 2006 and has been 
approved by HM Revenue & Customs as an investment trust in 
accordance with Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010.

The Company’s principal business activity of investment 
management is sub-contracted to Investec Fund Managers 
Limited (‘IFM’), the Alternative Investment Fund Manager 
of the Company. IFM delegates the management of the 
Company’s portfolio to Investec Asset Management  
Limited (‘IAM’).

A review of the business is given in the Chairman’s Statement 
and the Manager’s Review. The results of the Company are 
shown on page 36.

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE AND POLICY

The Company’s investment objective is to provide growth 
in income and capital to achieve a long term total return 
greater than the benchmark FTSE All-Share Index, through 
investment primarily in UK securities. The Company’s policy 
is to invest in a broad spread of securities with typically the 
majority of the portfolio selected from the constituents of the 
FTSE 350 Index.

The UK equity element of the portfolio will be mostly 
invested in the FTSE All-Share Index; however, exceptional 
positions may be sanctioned by the Board and up to 20% of 
the portfolio may be held in listed international equities in 
developed economies. The Company may continue to hold 
securities that cease to be quoted or listed if the Manager 
considers this to be appropriate. There is an absolute 
limit of 10% of the portfolio in any individual stock with a 
maximum exposure to a specific industrial or commercial 
sector of 25%, in each case irrespective of their weightings 
in the benchmark index.

It is the Company’s policy to invest no more than 15% of its 
gross assets in other listed investment companies (including 
listed investment trusts).

The Company maintains a diversified portfolio of investments, 
typically comprising 70-80 holdings, but without restricting 
the Company from holding a more or less concentrated 
portfolio from time to time as circumstances require.

The Company’s long term investment strategy emphasises:

• Achieving a portfolio yield of between 120-140%

of that of the FTSE All-Share Index.

•

Stocks of companies that are out of favour and whose
share prices do not match the Manager’s assessment of
their longer term value.

Liquidity and borrowings are managed with the aim of 
increasing returns to shareholders. The Company’s net 
gearing range may fluctuate between 0% and 30%, based 
on the current balance sheet structure, with an absolute limit 
of 50%.

As a general rule it is the Board’s intention that the portfolio 
should be reasonably fully invested. An investment level of 
90% of shareholder funds is regarded as a guideline minimum 
investment level dependent on market conditions.

Risk is managed through diversification of holdings, 
investment limits set by the Board and appropriate financial 
and other controls relating to the administration of assets.

INVESTMENT APPROACH

The investment approach of the Manager is premised on 
a contrarian view on the timing of buy and sell decisions, 
buying the shares of companies when sentiment towards 
them is thought to be near its worst and selling them as 
fundamental profit improvement and/or re-evaluation of  
their long term prospects takes place.

The belief is that repeated investor behaviour in driving  
down the prices of ‘out of favour’ companies to below their 
fair value will offer investment opportunities. This will allow 
the Company to purchase shares at significant discounts to 
their fair value and to sell them as they become more fully 
valued, principally as a result of predictable patterns in  
human psychology.

The Manager’s process is designed to produce ‘best ideas’ 
to drive active fund management within a rigorous control 
framework. The framework begins through narrowing down 
the universe of stocks by passing those companies with a 
market capitalisation above £200 million through a screening 
process which highlights the weakest performing stocks. 
This isolates opportunities with the most negative sentiment 
characteristics which are then in turn scrutinised in greater 
detail to identify investment opportunities.

The process is very much bottom up and can result in large 
sector positions being taken if enough stocks of sufficient 
interest are found within a single sector. However, top down 
risk analysis is undertaken to identify potential concentration 
of risk and to factor this awareness into portfolio construction. 
The portfolio comprises stocks which have been purchased 
for different reasons and at different times. In general, 
because of the bottom up approach to stockpicking, each of 
these reasons is independent of the other and the portfolio, 
therefore, is not excessively vulnerable to longer term macro 
trends. Cash is a residual of the process and normally will not 
exceed 5% of the portfolio value.

11

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONOVERVIEW OF STRATEGY CONTINUED

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

The principal key performance indicators (‘KPIs’) used to 
determine the progress and performance of the Company 
over time, and which are comparable to those reported by 
other investment trusts, are:

• Net asset value total return relative to the FTSE

All-Share Index and to competitors within the UK Equity
Income sector of investment trust companies;

• Discount/premium on net asset value;

• Earnings and dividends per share; and

• Ongoing charges.

While some elements of performance against KPIs are 
beyond management control they provide measures of 
the Company’s absolute and relative performance and are, 
therefore, monitored by the Board on a regular basis.

Net asset value (‘NAV’) total return
In reviewing the performance of the assets of the Company’s 
portfolio the Board monitors the NAV in relation to the FTSE 
All-Share Index. This is the most important KPI by which 
performance is judged. During the year the net asset value 
total return of the Company was -1.0% compared with a total 
return of 1.0% by the FTSE All-Share Index. The five year net 
asset value total return performance is shown below.

Net asset value total return

180

170

160

150

140

130

120

110

100

90

80

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream

Temple Bar share price – total return
Temple Bar NAV – total return
FTSE All-Share Index – total return

The approach to stock selection and portfolio construction is 
driven by four core beliefs:

1.

2.

3.

4.

 Markets overreact to news on the upside and the
downside. The Manager aims to be sceptical of the crowd
and aware of investor psychology, which often causes
overvaluation of those stocks that are deemed to have
good prospects and an undervaluation of those which are
out of favour.

 There are few companies which sustain below normal
profits over the longer term. Weaker companies tend to
leave an industry, thus improving the balance of supply
and demand, are bid for or management is changed.
Similarly, there are few companies which can sustain
supernormal profits over the longer term. Such profits
tend to be competed or regulated away.

 Fundamental valuation is the key determinant of share
price performance over the long term. In other words
‘cheap’ stocks will outperform ‘expensive’ stocks.

 Diversification is an important control. Particular
companies or sectors can be out of favour for a
considerable time.

PERFORMANCE

In the year to 31 December 2015 the net asset value total 
return of the Company was -1.0% compared with a total 
return of the Company’s benchmark index of 1.0%. The effect 
of removing gearing from the performance calculation is 
shown in the following graph of investment performance 
over a five year period compared with the FTSE All-Share 
Index. The Chairman’s Statement on pages 2 and 3 and 
the Manager’s Review on pages 4 to 9 include a review of 
developments during the year together with information on 
investment activity within the Company’s portfolio and an 
assessment of future developments.

Ungeared 5 year performance

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream

Temple Bar – gross assets, excluding effects of gearing and associated costs
FTSE All-Share Index - total return

160

140

120

100

80

12

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015 
Discount on net asset value
The Board monitors the premium/discount at which the 
Company’s shares trade in relation to the net assets. 
During the year the shares traded at an average discount 
to NAV of 3.7%. This compares with an average premium of 
1.0% in the previous year. The Board and Manager closely 
monitor both movements in the Company’s share price and 
significant dealings in the shares. In order to avoid substantial 
overhangs or shortages of shares in the market the Board 
asks shareholders to approve resolutions which allow for the 
buy back of shares and their issuance which can assist in the 
management of the discount or premium. Regular demand 
generated by monthly investment in the Savings Scheme and 
the use of marketing and promotional activity also assist in 
keeping the discount to an acceptable level.

(Discount)/premium to net asset value 
(excluding current year revenue)

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%

-2%

-4%

-6%

-8%

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Cum income NAV, debt at market value

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream

Earnings and dividend per share
It remains the directors’ intention to distribute, over time, 
by way of dividends substantially all of the Company’s 
net revenue income after expenses and taxation, subject 
to preserving a prudent balance in revenue reserves to 
facilitate a smooth dividend progression. The Manager aims 
to maximise total returns from the portfolio and attaches  
great importance to dividends in achieving total return.

The portfolio will typically provide a yield premium to the 
market. The final dividend recommended for the year is 
15.87p per ordinary share which brings the total for the year 
to 39.66p per ordinary share, an increase of 2%. This will 
be the 32nd consecutive year in which the Company has 
increased the overall level of its dividend payment.

10 Year Comparative Dividend Growth

150

140

130

120

110

100

90

80

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

Temple Bar
Retail Prices Index

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream

Ongoing charges
Ongoing charges is an expression of the Company’s 
management fees and other operating expenses as a 
percentage of average daily net assets over the year. The 
ongoing charges for the year ended 31 December 2015 were 
0.49% (2014: 0.48%). The Board compares the Company’s 
ongoing charges with those of its peers on a regular basis.  
At the present time the Company has one of the lowest 
ongoing charges in the UK Equity Income sector of 
investment trust companies.

13

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONOVERVIEW OF STRATEGY CONTINUED

PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

With the assistance of the Manager the Board has drawn up 
a risk matrix which identifies the key risks to the Company. 
The Board reviews and agrees policies, which have remained 
unchanged since the beginning of the accounting period, for 
managing these risks, as summarised below.

Investment strategy risk
An inappropriate investment strategy on matters such 
as asset allocation or the level of gearing may lead to 
underperformance against the Company’s benchmark 
index or peer companies, resulting in the Company’s shares 
trading on a wider discount. The Board manages such risks 
by diversification of investments through its investment 
restrictions and guidelines, which are monitored and 
reported on by the Manager. The Manager provides the 
directors with regular management information including 
absolute and relative performance data, attribution analysis, 
revenue estimates, liquidity reports, risk profile and 
shareholder analysis. The Board monitors the implementation 
and results of the investment process with the portfolio 
manager, who attends Board meetings. Periodically the 
Board holds a separate meeting devoted to strategy, the 
most recent being in January 2016.

Income risk – dividends
Generating the necessary level of income from portfolio 
investments to meet the Company’s expenses and to 
provide adequate reserves from which to base a sustainable 
programme of increasing dividend payments to shareholders 
is subject to the risk that income generation from investments 
fails to meet the level required. The Board monitors this risk 
through the receipt of detailed income reports and forecasts 
which are considered at each meeting. As at 31 December 
2015 the Company had distributable revenue reserves of  
£29.6 million before declaration of the final dividend  
for 2015 of £10.6 million.

Share price risk
The Company’s share price and premium or discount to 
NAV are monitored by the Manager and considered by the 
Board at each meeting. The directors attach considerable 
importance to any premium or discount to NAV at which 
the shares trade, both in absolute terms and relative to the 
average rating at which the UK Equity Income sector of 
investment trusts as a whole is trading. Premiums judged 
to be excessive will be addressed by repeated share 
issues, either new or from Treasury. Discounts judged to be 
excessive will be addressed by repeated share buybacks, 
for Treasury or cancellation. The directors are prepared to 
be proactive in premium/discount management to minimise 
potential disadvantages to shareholders. However, market 
sentiment is beyond the absolute control of the Manager and 
the Board.

Accounting, legal & regulatory
In order to qualify as an investment trust the Company must 
comply with Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010. 
Were the Company to breach Section 1158 it might lose 
investment trust status and, as a consequence, gains within 
the Company’s portfolio would be subject to capital gains 
tax. The Section 1158 qualification criteria are, therefore, 
monitored by the Board at each meeting.

The Company must also comply with the provisions of the 
Companies Act and, since its shares are listed on the London 
Stock Exchange, the UKLA Listing Rules. A breach of the 
Companies Act could result in the Company being fined or 
subject to criminal proceedings. Breach of the UKLA Listing 
Rules could result in the Company’s shares being suspended 
from Listing which in turn would breach Section 1158. The 
Board relies on the services of its Company Secretary, IAM, 
and its professional advisers to ensure compliance with the 
Companies Act and the UKLA Listing Rules and is satisfied that 
they are able to provide an appropriate service in this regard.

Corporate governance and shareholder relations 
Details of the Company’s compliance with corporate 
governance best practice including information on  
relations with shareholders, are set out in the corporate 
governance report on pages 24 to 26 which forms part  
of this strategic report.

Control systems risk
Disruption to, or failure of, IFM’s accounting, dealing or 
payments systems or the custodian’s records could prevent 
accurate reporting and monitoring of the Company’s financial 
position or adversely impact the ability to trade. Details of 
how the Board monitors the services provided by IFM and 
its associates and the key elements designed to provide 
effective internal control are included within the internal 
control section of the corporate governance report on  
page 26.

Other risks
Other risks to which the Company is exposed and which  
form part of the market risks referred to above are included 
in note 22 to the financial statements together with 
summaries of the policies for managing these risks. These 
comprise; market price risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, 
credit risk and currency risk.

VIABILITY STATEMENT

The Board makes an assessment of the longer term prospects 
of the Company beyond the timeframe envisaged under 
the going concern basis of accounting having regard to the 
Company’s current position and the principal risks it faces. 
The Company is a long term investment vehicle and the 
directors, therefore, believe that it is appropriate to assess 
its viability over a long term horizon. For the purposes of 
assessing the Company’s prospects in accordance with Code 
Provision C.2.2 of the UK Corporate Governance Code, the 
Board considers that assessing the Company’s prospects 
over a period of five years is appropriate given the nature of 
the Company and the inherent uncertainties of looking out 
over a longer time period. The directors believe that a five 
year period appropriately reflects the long term strategy of 
the Company and over which, in the absence of any adverse 
change to the regulatory environment and the favourable 
tax treatment afforded to UK investment trusts, they do 
not expect there to be any significant change to the current 
principal risks and to the adequacy of the mitigating controls 
in place.

14

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015In assessing the viability of the Company the directors have 
conducted a thorough assessment of each of the Company’s 
principal risks and uncertainties as set out on page 14. 
Particular scrutiny was given to the impact of a significant 
fall in global equity markets on the value of the Company’s 
investment portfolio. The directors have also considered 
the Company’s leverage and liquidity in the context of its 
fixed rate borrowings, notably the £25 million debenture 
due to expire in December 2017, its income and expenditure 
projections and the fact the Company’s investments comprise 
mainly readily realisable quoted securities which can be sold 
to meet funding requirements if necessary. 

All the key operations required by the Company are 
outsourced to third party providers and alternative providers 
could be secured at relatively short notice if necessary.

Having taken into account the Company’s current 
position and the potential impact of its principal risks and 
uncertainties, the directors have a reasonable expectation 
that the Company will be able to continue in operation and 
meet its liabilities as they fall due for a period of five years 
from the date of this Report. 

GENDER DIVERSITY

At the year end there were four male directors and two  
female directors on the Board. The Company has no 
employees and therefore there is nothing further to report 
in respect of gender representation within the Company.

The Company’s policy on diversity is detailed in the 
corporate governance report on page 25.

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS

All the Company’s activities are outsourced to third parties. 
The Company therefore has no greenhouse gas emissions to 
report from its operations.

EMPLOYEE, SOCIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, ETHICAL 
AND HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY

The Company is managed by IFM, has no employees and 
all its directors are non-executive. There are, therefore, no 
disclosures to be made in respect of employees. The Board 
notes the Manager’s policy statement in respect of Social, 
Environmental and Governance issues, as outlined below.

STEWARDSHIP/ENGAGEMENT

The Manager recognises its wider stewardship 
responsibilities to its clients as a major asset owner. To this 
end, it supports the FRC Stewardship Code, which sets out 
the responsibilities of institutional shareholders in respect of 
investee companies. Under the Code, managers should:

• publicly disclose their policy on how they will discharge

their stewardship responsibilities to their clients;

• disclose their policy on managing conflicts of interest;

• monitor their investee companies;

•

establish clear guidelines on how they escalate engagement;

• be willing to act collectively with other investors

where appropriate;

•

•

have a clear policy on proxy voting and disclose their
voting record; and

report to clients.

The Manager endorses the Stewardship Code for its UK 
investments and supports the principles as best practice 
elsewhere. The Manager believes that regular contact with 
the companies in which it invests is central to its investment 
process and it also recognises the importance of being an 
‘active’ owner on behalf of its clients.

The Manager believes that companies should act in a 
socially responsible manner. Although its priority at all times 
is the best economic interests of its clients, it recognises 
that, increasingly, non-financial issues such as social and 
environmental factors have the potential to impact the share 
price, as well as the reputation of companies. Specialists 
within the Manager’s environmental, social and governance 
team are tasked with assessing how companies deal with and 
report on social and environmental risks and issues specific to  
their industry.

The Manager’s Voting Policy and Corporate Governance 
Guidelines are available on request from the Company 
Secretary or can be downloaded from its website.

FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

The future development of the Company is dependent on 
the success of its investment strategy in the light of economic 
and equity market developments. The outlook is discussed in 
the Chairman’s Statement on page 2.

By order of the Board of Directors

John Reeve
Chairman
23 February 2016

15

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONPORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

INDUSTRY

PLACE OF  
PRIMARY LISTING

VALUATION OF 
HOLDING £M

% OF PORTFOLIO

1

UK TREASURY 4.00% 2016
Held in the portfolio in lieu of cash.

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

HSBC HOLDINGS
HSBC Holdings is one of the world’s largest 
banks. It is the leading international banking 
group in Asia (ex Japan) with a strong presence 
in the Middle East, North and South America and 
the UK. Approximately 2/3 of pre-tax profits are 
from Asia and emerging markets.

GLAXOSMITHKLINE 
GlaxoSmithKline is a global health care company 
with leading positions in large therapeutic areas 
such as respiratory, anti-infectives, diabetes and 
central nervous system disorders. The company 
has a consumer health division that markets a 
number of over-the-counter oral health and  
other health care products.

BP
BP is a global oil and gas company and is one of 
the six oil and gas “supermajors”. It is vertically-
integrated and is active in every area of the oil 
and gas industry, including exploration and 
production, refining, distribution and marketing, 
petrochemicals, power generation and trading.

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL
Royal Dutch Shell is a global oil and gas company. 
It is one of the six oil and gas “supermajors”. It is 
vertically-integrated and is active in every area of 
the oil and gas industry, including exploration and 
production, refining, distribution and marketing, 
petrochemicals, power generation and trading.

GRAFTON GROUP
Grafton is a distributor of building products that 
operates across the UK and Ireland and also has 
a small Belgian business. The group operates 
from about 500 sites in the UK, and this is by 
far its most important market, accounting for 
approximately 75% of sales.

LLOYDS BANKING GROUP
Lloyds Banking Group operates across a wide 
range of banking activities including retail and 
commercial banking and insurance.

BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO
BAT is one of the world’s largest tobacco groups 
with over 200 brands and leadership in more 
than 60 markets. The company’s leading brands 
are Dunhill, Kent, Lucky Strike and Pall Mall. 
BAT derives over half of its net turnover from 
developing markets.

ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND
RBS operates across a wide range of banking 
activities including personal and corporate 
lending, capital markets, leasing, personal 
financial services and private banking. The 
majority of the bank's assets are located in  
the UK.

10

DIRECT LINE INSURANCE
Direct Line group is the largest UK personal 
insurer. It has the leading market share in motor 
and home insurance and top five positions in 
travel, pet, rescue and commercial lines.

UK

73.171

8.6%

UK

71.808

8.4%

UK

57.567

6.7%

UK

55.995

6.5%

UK

42.842

5.0%

UK

40.995

4.8%

UK

40.665

4.8%

Fixed 
Interest

Financials

Healthcare

Oil & Gas

Oil & Gas

Industrials

Financials

UK

33.011

3.9%

Consumer Goods

UK

32.467

3.8%

UK

28.597

3.3%

Financials

Financials

Top Ten Investments

£477.118m

55.8%

16

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONTINUED

PLACE OF  
PRIMARY LISTING

VALUATION OF 
HOLDING £M

% OF 
PORTFOLIO

BT Group

INDUSTRY

Telecommunications

Gold Bullion Securities ETF

Financials

11

12

13 Wm Morrison Supermarkets

Consumer Services

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Centrica

Tesco

SIG

CitiGroup

Drax

CRH

Utilities

Consumer Services

Industrials

Financials

Utilities

Industrials

Imperial Brands

Consumer Goods

Top Twenty Investments

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Go-Ahead

Rio Tinto

Qinetiq

BG

Carnival

Vallourec

Green REIT

28 Marks & Spencer

29

30

Fresnillo

TNT Express

Top Thirty Investments

Consumer Services

Basic Materials

Industrials

Oil & Gas

Consumer Services

Industrials

Financials

Consumer Services

Basic Materials

Industrials

31

Standard Chartered

Financials

32 Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF

Basic Materials

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

Ladbrokes

Land Securities REIT

British Land REIT

Computacenter

Royal Mail

Joy Global

Chemring

Kingspan

Top Forty Investments

Consumer Services

Financials

Financials

Technology

Industrials

Industrials

Industrials

Industrials

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

Avon Products

Hammerson 6.875% 2020

Games Workshop

St Ives

Future

RSA Insurance 6.701% 2017 Variable 
Perpetual

Consumer Goods

USA

Fixed Interest

Consumer Goods

Industrials

Consumer Services

Fixed Interest

Aviva 2020 5.9021% FRN Perpetual

Fixed Interest

Lloyds Banking Group – preference shares

Financials

Hochschild Mining

Home Retail Group

Basic Materials

Consumer Services

Top Fifty Investments

51

52

Johnston Press

Lonmin

Total Valuation of Portfolio

Consumer Services

Basic Materials

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

USA

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

France

Ireland

UK

UK

Netherlands

UK

USA

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

USA

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

24.903

19.297

18.294

18.235

17.995

17.603

16.938

16.404

16.033

15.362

2.9%

2.3%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.0%

1.9%

1.9%

1.8%

658.182

77.0%

14.876

13.191

12.860

11.027

10.994

10.158

10.045

9.875

9.486

9.143

1.7%

1.5%

1.5%

1.3%

1.3%

1.2%

1.2%

1.2%

1.1%

1.1%

769.837

90.1%

8.883

8.621

8.336

8.225

8.103

7.049

6.268

6.224

4.342

4.252

1.0%

1.0%

1.0%

1.0%

1.0%

0.8%

0.7%

0.7%

0.5%

0.5%

840.140

98.3%

3.923

2.920

2.837

1.449

1.213

1.055

0.971

0.805

0.173

0.095

0.5%

0.3%

0.3%

0.2%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.0%

0.0%

855.581

100.0%

0.029

0.015

0.0%

0.0%

£855.625m

100.0%

I

S
T
R
A
T
E
G
C
R
E
P
O
R
T

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
R
E
P
O
R
T

I

I

F
N
A
N
C
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

S
H
A
R
E
H
O
L
D
E
R

I

N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N

17

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATION 
 
 
 
BOARD OF DIRECTORS

JOHN REEVE

ARTHUR COPPLE

RICHARD JEWSON*

John Reeve, Chairman, was 
appointed a director in 1992. 
He was formerly executive 
chairman of the Willis Group, 
group managing director of 
Sun Life Assurance Society and 
a member of the boards of the 
Association of British Insurers 
and the International Insurance 
Society. He is a director of a 
number of other companies.

Arthur Copple was appointed 
a director in 2011. He has 
specialised in the investment 
company sector for over 30 
years. He was a partner at Kitcat 
& Aitken, an executive director 
of Smith New Court PLC and a 
managing director  
of Merrill Lynch.

Richard Jewson was appointed a 
director in 2001. He first worked 
in the timber and building 
material supply industry, 
becoming managing director of 
Jewson, the builders’ merchants, 
for twelve years from 1974, 
and then managing director 
and chairman of its parent 
company Meyer International 
PLC from which he retired in 
1993. He is currently chairman 
of Raven Russia Limited and 
Tritax Big Box REIT PLC and a 
non-executive director of other 
private companies.

JUNE DE MOLLER

LESLEY SHERRATT

DAVID WEBSTER

June de Moller was appointed a 
director in 2005. She is a former 
managing director of Carlton 
Communications PLC and was 
previously a non-executive 
director of J Sainsbury PLC, 
Cookson Group PLC, BT PLC  
and Derwent London PLC.

Lesley Sherratt was appointed 
a director in 2015. She was 
formerly Investment Director 
for the Save & Prosper and 
Fleming Flagship range of 
funds, and CEO & CIO of Ark 
Asset Management Ltd. She has 
over twenty years experience 
investing in the financial sector, 
including investment trusts, and 
served as a director and Chair of 
US Small Companies Investment 
Trust. She is currently a director 
of a private foundation, lectures 
in global business ethics at King's 
College London and is the author 
of 'Can Microfinance Work? How 
to Improve its Ethical Balance 
and Effectiveness'.

David Webster was appointed 
a director in 2009. His career 
started in corporate finance 
at Samuel Montagu before 
becoming a founder and 
subsequently chairman of 
Safeway PLC from which he 
retired in 2004. He is currently 
a non-executive director of 
Amadeus IT Holdings SA. He has 
a wide range of other business 
interests including membership 
of the Appeals Committee of 
the Panel on Takeovers and 
Mergers. He was previously 
chairman of InterContinental 
Hotels Group PLC and a non-
executive director of Reed 
Elsevier PLC.

All the directors are independent and members of the audit and nomination committees.
* Chairman of the audit committee and Senior Independent Director.

18

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015REPORT OF DIRECTORS

The directors present their report and accounts for the 
year ended 31 December 2015.

THE ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUND MANAGERS 
DIRECTIVE (‘AIFMD’)

Investec Fund Managers Limited (‘IFM’), an affiliate of 
Investec Asset Management Limited (‘IAM’), was appointed 
as the Company’s alternative investment fund manager 
(‘AIFM’ or ‘Manager’) on 21 July 2014. For the purposes of 
the AIFMD the Company is an alternative investment fund 
(‘AIF’). IFM has delegated responsibility for the day to day 
management of the Company’s portfolio to IAM.

IFM is required to ensure that a depositary is appointed and 
accordingly IFM and the Company have appointed HSBC as 
the depositary and custodian. HSBC is responsible for the 
custody of the Company’s assets and for monitoring its  
cash flows.

The AIFMD requires certain information to be made available 
to investors in AIFs before they invest and requires that 
material changes to this information be disclosed in the 
annual report of each AIF. An Investor Information Document, 
which sets out information on the Company’s investment 
strategy and policies, leverage, risk, liquidity, administration, 
management, fees, conflicts of interest and other shareholder 
information is available on the Company’s website at  
www.templebarinvestments.co.uk.

There have been no material changes to this information 
requiring disclosure. Any information requiring immediate 
disclosure pursuant to the AIFMD will be disclosed to the 
London Stock Exchange through a primary information 
provider. As an authorised AIFM, IFM will make the requisite 
disclosures on remuneration levels and policies to the 
Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’) at the appropriate time.

MANAGEMENT FEES

The Company has a management agreement with Investec 
Fund Managers Limited (‘IFM’) for the provision of investment 
management services. The agreement is subject to one year’s 
notice of termination by either party.

IFM receives an investment management fee of 0.35% 
per annum, payable quarterly, based on the value of the 
investments (including cash) of the Company together with 
an additional fee of £125,000 pa, plus or minus 0.005% of 
the value of the investments (including cash) of the Company 
above or below £750 million, calculated and payable 
quarterly. Investments in funds managed by IFM are wholly 
excluded from this charge.

There is also a fee payable to Investec Asset Management 
Limited of £45,000 pa in respect of the provision of 
secretarial and administrative services, adjusted annually  
in line with the Retail Price Index.

IFM’s performance under the contract and the contract 
terms are reviewed at least annually. This covers, inter 
alia, the performance of the Manager, its management 
processes, investment style, resources and risk controls. 
The Board endorses the investment approach adopted by 
the Manager, recognising that while the contrarian style can 
sometimes lead to short term periods of underperformance 
it usually delivers superior investment returns over the 
longer term. In addition, the portfolio has produced high 
and growing dividend income to shareholders. In the 
opinion of the directors the continued appointment of the 
Manager on the terms set out above is, therefore, in the  
best interests of shareholders.

GOING CONCERN

The directors have reviewed the going concern basis of 
accounting for the Company. The Company’s assets consist 
substantially of equity shares in listed companies and in most 
circumstances are realisable within a short timescale. The 
use of the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate 
because there are no material uncertainties related to events 
or conditions that may cast significant doubt about the ability 
of the Company to continue as a going concern. After making 
enquiries, the directors have a reasonable expectation 
that the Company has adequate resources to continue in 
operational existence for the foreseeable future, including 
recourse to a £7.5 million overdraft facility with HSBC Bank. 
Accordingly, the directors continue to adopt the going 
concern basis in preparing the accounts.

ORDINARY DIVIDENDS

Interim dividends of 7.93p per ordinary share were paid on  
30 June 2015, 30 September 2015 and 30 December 2015 
(2014: a single interim dividend payment of 15.55p) and the 
directors are recommending a final dividend of 15.87p per 
ordinary share (2014: 23.33p), a total for the year of 39.66p 
(2014: 38.88p). Subject to shareholders’ approval, the final 
dividend will be paid on 31 March 2016 to shareholders on 
the register on 11 March 2016.

ISAs

The Company has conducted its investment policy so 
as to remain a qualifying investment trust under the ISA 
regulations. It is the intention of the Board to continue to 
satisfy these regulations.

19

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONREPORT OF DIRECTORS CONTINUED

SHARE CAPITAL

SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDERS

As at 31 December 2015 and 23 February 2016 the following 
were registered or had indicated an interest in 3% or more of 
the issued ordinary shares of the Company.

Brewin Dolphin Ltd

Alliance Trust Savings Ltd

Speirs & Jeffrey Ltd

Temple Bar Savings Scheme

Investec Wealth & Investment Ltd

%

8.7

7.8

6.5

5.3

5.1

3.1

DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION TO AUDITOR

The directors are not aware of any relevant information of which 
the auditor is unaware and have taken all the steps that they 
ought to have taken as directors in order to make themselves 
aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that 
the Company’s auditor is aware of that information.

AUDITOR

A resolution to re-appoint Ernst & Young LLP as auditor 
to the Company will be proposed at the Annual General 
Meeting on 30 March 2016.

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

The notice of the Annual General Meeting of the Company 
to be held on 30 March 2016 is on page 51. In addition to  
the ordinary business the following matters are proposed  
as special business.

Authority to allot shares and disapplication  
of pre-emption rights
It is proposed that the directors be authorised to allot up to 
£1,671,819 of relevant securities in the Company (equivalent 
to 6,687,276 ordinary shares of 25p each, representing 10.0% 
of its ordinary shares in issue as at 23 February 2016).

When shares are to be allotted for cash, the Companies 
Act 2006 requires such new shares to be offered first to 
existing shareholders in proportion to their existing holdings 
of ordinary shares. However, in certain circumstances, it is 
beneficial to allot shares for cash otherwise than pro rata to 
existing shareholders and the ordinary shareholders can by 
special resolution waive their pre-emption rights. Therefore, 
a special resolution will be proposed at the AGM which, if 
passed, will give the directors the power to allot for cash 
equity securities up to an aggregate nominal amount of 
£1,671,819 (equivalent to 6,687,276 ordinary shares of 25p 
each or 10.0% of the Company’s existing issued ordinary 
share capital).

Number of 
shares issued

Voting rights 
per share

Total 
voting rights

AXA SA

No new ordinary shares were issued during the year.

SECTION 992 OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2006

The following information is disclosed in accordance with 
Section 992 of the Companies Act 2006.

Capital structure
The Company’s capital structure is summarised on page 46.

Voting Rights in the Company’s Shares 
The voting rights at 31 December 2015 were:

Share class

Ordinary shares 
of 25p each

66,872,765

1

66,872,765

As at 23 February 2016, the share capital of the Company and 
total voting rights was 66,872,765. There are no restrictions 
on the transfer of securities in the Company and there are 
no special rights attached to any of the shares. Deadlines for 
the exercise of voting rights and details of arrangements by 
which someone other than the registered shareholder can 
exercise voting rights are provided in the Notes to the Notice 
of Meeting on page 53. The Company’s ordinary shares have 
a Premium listing on the London Stock Exchange.

Change of control
There are no agreements that may be altered or terminated 
on change of control of the Company.

DIRECTORS

The directors of the Company who held office at the end of 
the year are detailed on page 18. Martin Riley retired as a 
director on 30 March 2015. No other person was a director 
during any part of the year. Details of directors’ beneficial 
shareholdings may be found in the Report on Directors' 
Remuneration on page 22.

All the directors will be retiring in compliance with the 
provisions of the AIC Code and, each being eligible, the 
Board recommends their re-election. In making these 
recommendations the Board has carefully reviewed the 
composition of the Board as a whole and borne in mind the 
need for a proper balance of skills and experience. The Board 
does not believe that length of service of itself detracts from 
the independence of a director, particularly in relation to an 
investment trust, and on that basis considers that all directors 
standing for re-election are independent. It is confirmed that, 
following formal evaluation, the performance of each director 
continues to be effective and each continues to demonstrate 
commitment to the role.

There were no contracts subsisting during or at the end 
of the year in which a director of the Company is or was 
interested and which are or were significant in relation to the 
Company’s business. No director has a service contract with 
the Company.

20

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015The directors intend to use this authority to issue new shares 
to participants in the Temple Bar Investment Trust Savings 
Scheme or to other prospective purchasers whenever they 
believe it may be advantageous to shareholders to do so. Any 
such issues would only be made at prices greater than net 
asset value per share, as adjusted for the market value of the 
Company’s debt, and would, therefore, increase the assets 
underlying each share. The issue proceeds would be available 
for investment in line with the Company’s investment policy.

No issues of shares will be made which would alter the 
control of the Company without the prior approval of 
shareholders in general meeting.

Directors’ authority to purchase the Company’s  
own shares
The directors consider it desirable to give the Company the 
opportunity to buy back shares in circumstances where the 
shares may be bought for a price which is below the net asset 
value per share of the Company. The purchase of ordinary 
shares is intended to reduce the discount at which ordinary 
shares trade in the market through the Company becoming 
a new source of demand for such shares. The rules of the 
UK Listing Authority provide that the maximum price which 
can be paid by the Company is 5% above the average of the 
market value of the ordinary shares for the five business days 
before the purchase is made.

Recommendation
The Board considers the resolutions to be proposed at the 
AGM to be in the best interests of the Company and its 
members as a whole. Accordingly, the directors unanimously 
recommend that shareholders should vote in favour of the 
resolutions to be proposed at the AGM, as they intend to do 
so in respect of their own beneficial holdings, amounting to 
110,010 ordinary shares.

By order of the Board of Directors

John Reeve 
Chairman
23 February 2016

I

S
T
R
A
T
E
G
C
R
E
P
O
R
T

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
R
E
P
O
R
T

I

I

F
N
A
N
C
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

S
H
A
R
E
H
O
L
D
E
R

I

N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N

21

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATION 
 
 
 
REPORT ON DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION

The Board presents the report on directors’ remuneration for 
the year ended 31 December 2015 which has been prepared 
in accordance with Section 421 of the Companies Act 2006. 
The report comprises a policy report, which is subject to a 
triennial binding shareholder vote, or sooner if an alteration 
to the policy is proposed, and a remuneration policy 
implementation report, which is subject to an annual advisory 
vote. The remuneration policy is set out in the Future Policy 
Table on this page.

The law requires the Company’s auditor to audit certain parts 
of the disclosures provided. Where disclosures have been 
audited, they are indicated as such. The auditor’s opinion is 
included in their report on page 30.

The principles remain the same as for previous years. There 
have been no changes to remuneration policy during the 
period of this Report nor are there any proposals for change 
in the foreseeable future.

DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT

The Company does not have any executive directors and, 
as permitted under the Listing Rules, has not, therefore, 
established a remuneration committee. Remuneration of 
non-executive directors is viewed as a decision of the Board, 
subject to any shareholder approvals which may  
be necessary.

The level of directors’ fees is determined with reference to 
a range of factors including the remuneration paid to the 
directors of other investment trusts, comparable in terms 
of both size and investment characteristics, and the rate 
of inflation. The Manager of the Company compiles such 
analysis as part of the management and secretarial services 
provided to the Company. These data, together with 
consideration of any alteration in non-executive directors’ 
responsibilities, are used to review whether any change in 
remuneration is necessary. No other external advice is taken 
in considering such fees.

It is the Company’s policy that no director shall be entitled to 
any performance related remuneration, benefits in kind, long 
term incentive schemes, share options, pensions or other 
retirement benefits or compensation for loss of office. None 
of the Directors has a service contract with the Company.

The Company has no employees and consequently no 
consideration is required to be given to employment 
conditions elsewhere in setting directors’ pay.

Consideration of Shareholders’ Views
An ordinary resolution to approve the remuneration report 
is put to shareholders at each AGM, and shareholders 
have the opportunity to express their views and raise any 
queries in respect of remuneration policy at this meeting. 
To date, no shareholders have commented in respect of 
remuneration policy.

At the AGM held on 24 March 2014 an ordinary resolution 
for the approval of the remuneration policy, as set out above 
and in the future policy table below, was approved. It is 
the intention of the Board that the policy on remuneration 
will continue to apply for the next financial year to 
31 December 2016.

FUTURE POLICY TABLE

Purpose and link to strategy

Fees payable to directors should be sufficient to attract and 
retain individuals of high calibre with suitable knowledge and 
experience. Those chairing the Board and key committees 
should be paid higher fees than other directors in recognition of 
their more demanding roles. Fees should reflect the time spent 
by directors on the Company’s affairs and the responsibilities 
borne by the directors.

Maximum and minimum levels

Remuneration consists of a fixed fee each year, set in accordance 
with the stated policies, and any increase granted must be in line 
with the stated policies.

The Company’s Articles of Association set a limit of £250,000 in 
respect of the total remuneration that may be paid to directors 
in any financial year.

The Board reviews the quantum of directors’ pay each year to 
ensure this is in line with the level of remuneration for other 
investment trusts of a similar size.

When making recommendations for any changes in pay, the 
Board will consider wider factors such as the average rate of 
inflation over the period since the previous review, and the level 
and any change in complexity of the directors’ responsibilities 
(including additional time commitments as a result of increased 
regulatory or corporate governance requirements).

There is no compensation for loss of office.

REMUNERATION IMPLEMENTATION REPORT

A single figure for the total remuneration of each  
director is set out in the table below for the year ended  
31 December 2015. These fees exclude employers’ national 
insurance contributions and VAT where applicable:

John Reeve

Arthur Copple

June de Moller

Richard Jewson

Martin Riley

Lesley Sherratt

David Webster

Total

Total amount  
of salary and fees1

2015

33,400

22,600

22,600

25,500

5,650

16,950

22,600

149,300

2014

32,750

22,150

22,150

25,000

22,150

–

22,150

146,350

1  Other columns have been omitted as no payments of any other type were made.

The information in the above table has been audited. The 
amounts paid by the Company to the directors were for 
services as non-executive directors.

22

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015Expenditure by the Company on remuneration  
and distributions to shareholders
As the Company has no employees, the directors do  
not consider it appropriate to present a table comparing 
remuneration paid to employees with distributions  
to shareholders.

Performance graph
The directors consider that the most appropriate measure 
of the Company’s performance is its share price total return 
compared with the total return on the FTSE All-Share Index. 
A graph illustrating this relative performance over a seven 
year period is shown below.

Directors’ shareholdings
The directors’ shareholdings are detailed below:

31 December 2015

1 January 2015

57,613

27,924

9,305

9,760

N/A

–

4,151

54,784

22,661

8,415

9,168

15,000

N/A

3,983

John Reeve

Arthur Copple

June de Moller

Richard Jewson

Martin Riley*

Lesley Sherratt**

David Webster

* Retired 30 March 2015. 
**  Appointed 1 April 2015.

All the above interests are beneficial. None of the directors 
had at any date any interest in either of the Company’s 
debenture stocks.

On 4 January 2016 Mr Reeve acquired an additional 428 
ordinary shares as a result of a dividend reinvestment. On 
12 January 2016 Mr Reeve acquired a further 147 ordinary 
shares in the Company through his regular monthly saving 
in an ISA and on 10 February 2016 he acquired a further 104 
ordinary shares. On 22 January 2016 Mr Copple, Mr Jewson 
and Mrs de Moller acquired a further 502, 25 and 51 ordinary 
shares respectively in the Company through their regular 
monthly savings in the Temple Bar Investment Trust Savings 
Scheme. No other changes in the interests shown above 
occurred between 31 December 2015 and 23 February 2016.

Statement of Voting at General Meeting
At the Company's last AGM held on 30 March 2015 
shareholders approved the Directors' Remuneration Report 
in respect of the year ended 31 December 2014. 99.6% of 
proxy votes were in favour of the resolution, 0.4% were 
against and 63,659 votes were withheld.

Share price total return

280

260

240

220

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Temple Bar share price (total return)

FTSE All-Share Index (total return)

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream

Annual statement
The Board confirms that the above Remuneration 
Implementation Report in respect of the year ended 
31 December 2015 summarises:

•

•

•

the major decisions on directors’ remuneration;

any significant changes relating to directors’
remuneration made during the year; and

the context in which the changes occurred
and decisions have been taken.

By order of the Board of Directors 

John Reeve
Chairman
23 February 2016

23

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

THE AIC CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance is the process by which the board of 
directors of a company looks after shareholders’ interests and 
by which it seeks to enhance shareholder value. Shareholders 
hold the directors responsible for the stewardship of a 
company’s affairs, delegating authority and responsibility 
to the directors to manage the company on their behalf and 
holding them accountable for its performance.

The Board considers the practice of good governance to 
be an integral part of the way it manages the Company 
and is committed to maintaining high standards of financial 
reporting, transparency and business integrity.

As Temple Bar is a UK-listed company the Board’s principal 
governance reporting obligation is in relation to the UK 
Corporate Governance Code (the “UK Code”) issued 
by the Financial Reporting Council (‘FRC’) in September 
2014. However, it is recognised that investment companies 
have special circumstances which have an impact on their 
governance arrangements. An investment company typically 
has no employees and the roles of CEO, portfolio manager, 
administration, accounting and company secretarial tend to 
be outsourced to a third party. The Association of Investment 
Companies has therefore drawn up its own set of guidelines 
known as the AIC Code of Corporate Governance (the “AIC 
Code”) issued in February 2013 and updated in 2015, which 
recognises the nature of investment companies by focusing 
on matters such as board independence and the review 
of management and other third party contracts. The FRC 
has endorsed the AIC Code and confirmed that companies 
which report against the AIC Code will be meeting their 
obligations in relation to the UK Corporate Governance 
Code and paragraph LR9.8.6 of the FCA’s Listing Rules. 
The Board believes that reporting against the principles 
and recommendations of the AIC Code will provide better 
information to shareholders.

The Company has complied with the recommendations  
of the AIC Code (which incorporates the UK Corporate 
Governance Code), except as set out below. The UK 
Corporate Governance Code includes provisions relating to:

•

•

•

the role of the chief executive

executive directors’ remuneration

the need for an internal audit function

The Board considers these provisions are not relevant to 
the position of Temple Bar, being an externally managed 
investment company. In particular, all of the Company’s 
day-to-day management and administrative functions are 
outsourced to third parties. As a result, the Company has no 
executive directors, employees or internal operations. The 
Company has therefore not reported further in respect of 
these provisions.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF THE AIC 
CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Operation of the Board
The Board is ultimately responsible for framing and 
executing the Company’s strategy and for closely 
monitoring risks. There is a formal schedule of matters to 
be specifically approved by the Board and it has delegated 
investment management, within clearly defined parameters 
and dealing limits, to Investec Fund Managers Limited 
(‘IFM’) and the administration of the business to Investec 
Asset Management Limited (‘IAM’). The Board reviews the 
performance of the Company at Board meetings and sets 
the objectives for the Manager.

The Corporate Company Secretary (‘the Company Secretary’) 
is responsible to the Board, inter alia, for ensuring that Board 
procedures are followed and for compliance with applicable 
rules and regulations including the AIC Code. Appointment 
or removal of the nominated representative of the Company 
Secretary is a matter for the Board as a whole. 

The content and presentation of Board papers circulated 
before each meeting contain sufficient information on the 
financial condition of the Company. Key representatives of 
IFM attend each Board meeting enabling directors to probe 
on matters of concern or seek clarification on certain issues. 

Biographies of those directors in office at the date of 
signing of the financial statements are set out on page 18. 
Martin Riley stood down as a director on 30 March 2015 
and Lesley Sherratt was appointed as a director with effect 
from 1 April 2015. There were seven Board meetings, two 
audit committee meetings and two nomination committee 
meetings held during the year and the attendance by the 
directors was as follows:

Number of meetings attended

Board

Audit 
Committee

Nomination 
Committee

7

7

7

7

2

4

7

2

2

2

2

–

1

2

2

2

2

2

1

–

2

John Reeve

Arthur Copple

June de Moller

Richard Jewson

Martin Riley*

Lesley Sherratt**

David Webster

*
retired 30 March 2015
**  appointed 1 April 2015

24

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015Audit committee
The audit committee is a formally constituted committee 
of the Board with defined terms of reference. Its role 
and responsibilities are set out in the Report of the Audit 
Committee on page 27. The Board is satisfied that members 
of the audit committee have relevant and recent financial 
experience to fulfil their role effectively. The auditor, who 
the Board has identified as being independent, is invited 
to attend the audit committee meeting at which the annual 
accounts are considered and any other meetings that the 
committee deems necessary. The committee is chaired by  
Mr Jewson, the Senior Independent Director.

Re-election of directors
Directors are subject to re-election by shareholders at the 
first AGM following their appointment and, thereafter, are 
subject to retirement on an annual basis. In addition, the 
appointment of each director is reviewed by other members 
of the Board every year. Directors are not, therefore, subject 
to automatic re-appointment. Non-executive directors are 
not appointed for specified terms. Because of the nature of 
an investment trust the Board believes that the contribution 
and independence of a director is not diminished by long 
service and, conversely, that a more detailed knowledge of 
the Company and its business has a beneficial impact.

Nomination committee
A nomination committee comprising all the directors has 
been established to oversee a formal review procedure 
governing the appointment of new directors and to 
evaluate the overall composition of the Board from time to 
time, taking into account the existing balance of skills and 
knowledge. This committee is chaired by Mr Reeve.

The committee is also responsible for assessing on an annual 
basis the individual performance of directors and for making 
recommendations as to whether they should remain in office.

Management engagement committee
As all the directors are fully independent of the management 
company, the Board as a whole fulfils the function of a 
management engagement committee.

Independence of the directors
Each of the directors is independent of any association with 
the Manager and has no other relationships or circumstances 
which might be perceived to interfere with the exercise 
of independent judgement. Three of the six directors (Mr 
Reeve, Mr Jewson and Mrs de Moller) have served on 
the Board for more than nine years from the date of their 
first election, but given the nature of the Company as an 
investment trust and the strongly independent mind-set of 
the individuals involved, the Board is firmly of the view that 
all of the directors can be considered to be independent. 
In arriving at this conclusion the Board makes a clear 
distinction between the activities of an investment trust and 
a conventional trading company. An investment trust has 
no employees or executive directors, the only significant 
relationship being with the Manager. In overseeing this 
relationship it is the view of the Board that long service aids 
the understanding, judgement, objectivity and independence 
of the directors and in no way detracts from any of these 
qualities. The directors have a range of business and 
financial skills and experience relevant to the direction of the 
Company. Mr Jewson is the Senior Independent Director.

The Board has carefully considered the position of each 
of the directors and believes it would be appropriate for 
them to be proposed for re-election. Each of the directors 
continues to be effective and to display an undiminished 
enthusiasm and commitment to the role.

Diversity
The Board’s policy on diversity, including gender, is to 
take this into consideration during the recruitment and 
appointment process. Typically, the Board seeks to ensure 
that there is a suitable balance between directors with 
industrial/commercial and traditional ‘City’ backgrounds. 
However, the Board is committed to appointing the most 
appropriate candidate, regardless of gender or other forms 
of diversity, and therefore no targets have been set against 
which to report.

Induction and training
New directors appointed to the Board are provided with 
an induction programme which is tailored to the particular 
circumstances of the appointee. Regular briefings are 
provided during the year on industry and regulatory matters 
and the directors receive other relevant training as required. 
Individual directors may seek independent advice at the 
expense of the Company within certain limits. 

Ongoing evaluation
On an annual basis the Board formally reviews its 
performance, together with that of the audit and nomination 
committees and the effectiveness and contribution of the 
individual directors, including the Chairman, within the 
context of service on those bodies. The review encompasses 
an assessment of how cohesively these bodies work as a 
whole as well as the performance of the individuals within 
them. In 2013 the Board also employed the services of the 
Institute of Directors to carry out an external evaluation of 
its performance. On the basis of these reviews the Board has 
concluded that it has an appropriate balance of skills and is 
operating effectively.

25

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONCORPORATE GOVERNANCE CONTINUED

The Board has also established a series of investment 
parameters, which are reviewed annually, designed to  
limit the risk inherent in managing a portfolio of 
investments. The safeguarding of assets is entrusted  
to an independent reputable custodian with whom the 
holdings are regularly reconciled.

The effectiveness of the overall system of internal control is 
reviewed on an annual basis by the Board. Such a system can 
provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance against 
material misstatement or loss. The Board believes that there 
is a robust framework of internal controls in place to meet  
the requirements of the AIC Code.

The Board receives reports from its advisers on internal 
control matters. Based on the foregoing the Company has a 
continuing process for identifying, evaluating and managing 
the risks it faces. This process has been in place for the 
reporting period and to the date of this report.

Shareholder communications
Shareholder relations are given high priority by both the 
Board and the Manager. The principal medium by which the 
Company communicates with shareholders is through half 
yearly reports and annual reports. The information contained 
therein is supplemented by daily NAV announcements and by 
a monthly fact sheet available on the Company’s website. 

The Board largely delegates responsibility for communication 
with shareholders to the management company and, through 
feedback, both from the Manager and the Company's 
stockbroker, expects to be able to develop an understanding 
of their views. Members of the Board are willing to meet with 
shareholders for the purpose of discussing matters in relation 
to the operation and prospects of the Company.

The Board encourages investors to attend the AGM and 
welcomes questions and discussion on issues of concern 
or areas of uncertainty. In addition, special arrangements 
have been established to allow Temple Bar Savings Scheme 
investors to participate fully at AGMs.

Following the formal AGM proceedings the Manager makes 
a presentation to the meeting outlining the key investment 
issues that face the Company.

Accountability, internal controls and audit 
The Board pays careful attention to ensuring that all 
documents released by the Company, including the Annual 
Report, present a fair and accurate assessment of the 
Company’s position and prospects.

The Board confirms that there is an ongoing process for 
identifying, evaluating and managing the risks faced by the 
Company in accordance with the FRC's document 'Guidance 
on Risk Management, Internal Controls and Related Financial 
and Business Reporting'.

The directors are responsible for the Company’s system of 
internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness. In order 
to facilitate the control process the Board has requested 
the Manager to confirm annually that it has conducted the 
Company’s affairs in compliance with the legal and regulatory 
obligations which apply to the Company and to report on the 
systems and procedures within IFM which are applicable to 
the management of Temple Bar’s affairs. The Board meets on 
seven scheduled occasions in each year and at each meeting 
receives sufficient financial and statistical information to 
enable it to monitor adequately the investment performance 
and status of the business. In addition, financial information is 
circulated to the directors on a monthly basis.

26

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

I am pleased to present the Committee’s report to 
shareholders on the effectiveness of the external audit 
process and how this has been assessed for the year  
ended 31 December 2015.

ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The Company has established a separately chaired  
Audit Committee (“the Committee”) whose duties include 
considering and recommending to the Board for approval the 
contents of the half yearly and annual financial statements, 
and providing an opinion as to whether the Annual Report, 
taken as a whole, is fair, balanced, understandable and 
provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess 
the Company’s performance, business model and strategy. 
The Committee also reviews the external auditor’s report 
thereon and is responsible for reviewing and forming an 
opinion on the effectiveness of the external audit process 
and audit quality. Other duties include reviewing the 
appropriateness of the Company’s accounting policies and 
ensuring the adequacy of the internal control systems and 
standards, as set out in more detail below. The Terms of 
Reference of the Committee are available on the Company’s 
website at www.templebarinvestments.co.uk

The Committee meets at least twice a year. The two  
planned meetings are held prior to the Board meetings 
to approve the half yearly and annual results.

COMPOSITION

All the directors are members of the Committee, which 
is chaired by Mr Jewson. The Board considers that the 
members of the Committee have sufficient recent and 
relevant financial experience for the Committee to discharge 
its function effectively. The Chairman of the Company is a 
member of the Committee to enable him to be kept fully 
informed of any issues which may arise.

RESPONSIBILITIES AND REVIEW OF 
THE EXTERNAL AUDIT 

During the year the principal activities of the 
Committee included:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

considering and recommending to the Board for
approval the contents of the half yearly and annual
financial statements and reviewing the external
auditor’s report thereon;

reviewing the scope, execution, results, cost
effectiveness, independence and objectivity of the
external auditor;

reviewing and recommending to the Board for approval
the audit and non-audit fees payable to the external
auditor and the terms of their engagement;

reviewing and approving the external auditor’s plan
for the financial year, with a focus on the identification
of areas of audit risk, and consideration of the
appropriateness of the level of audit materiality adopted;

reviewing the quality of the audit engagement
partner and the audit team, and making a
recommendation to the Board with respect to
the re-appointment of the auditor;

reviewing the appropriateness of the Company’s
accounting policies; and

ensuring the adequacy of the internal control
systems and standards.

SIGNIFICANT ISSUES CONSIDERED REGARDING THE 
ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During the year, the Audit Quality Review ('AQR') team within 
the Financial Reporting Council ('FRC') reported to the Audit 
Committee that it had concluded a review of the audit of the 
Company performed by Ernst & Young in respect of the year to 
31 December 2014. The FRC's activities include the independent 
inspection of the overall quality of the auditing function in the UK, 
and the AQR team carries out a number of reviews of company 
audits annually. The Audit Committee carefully considered 
the AQR's findings and discussed them with Ernst & Young. 
The findings were noted for subsequent years but were not 
considered significant in the context of the audit as a whole.

The Committee also considered significant issues and areas 
of key audit risk in respect of the Annual Report and Financial 
Statements, as outlined below. The Committee reviewed the 
external audit plan at an early stage and concluded that the 
appropriate areas of audit risk relevant to the Company had 
been identified and that suitable audit procedures had been 
put in place to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial 
statements as a whole would be free of material misstatements. 
The table below sets out the key areas of risk identified and also 
explains how these were addressed by the Committee.

Significant Issue

How the issue was addressed

Verification of the  
existence of the 
assets in the portfolio

The valuation of the 
investment portfolio

Going concern

Compliance with 
Sections 1158  
and 1159 of the 
Corporation Tax  
Act 2010

The verification of 
investment income

The Committee reviews reports from its 
service providers on key controls over the 
assets of the Company. Any significant 
issues are reported by the Manager to the 
Committee.

The Committee reviews detailed portfolio 
valuations on a regular basis throughout 
the year and receives confirmation from 
the Manager that the pricing basis is 
appropriate. The audit includes a check 
of pricing back to source data to confirm 
that the correct valuation basis has 
been applied in accordance with the 
accounting policies adopted, as disclosed 
in note 1 to the Financial Statements.

Having considered the Company’s 
investment objective, risk management 
policies and cash flow projections 
the Committee is satisfied that the 
Company has adequate resources and 
an appropriate financial structure to 
continue in operational existence for the 
foreseeable future.

Ongoing compliance with the  
eligibility criteria is monitored on 
a regular basis by the board.

The Committee reviews income
forecasts and receives explanations 
from the Manager for any variations or 
significant movements from previous 
forecasts and prior year numbers.

The provision of portfolio valuation, accounting and 
administration services is delegated to the Company’s 
Manager, who sub-delegates fund accounting to a third party 
service provider, and the provision of custody services is 
contracted to HSBC.

27

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONREPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE CONTINUED

AUDITOR AND AUDIT TENURE

The Company’s current auditor, Ernst & Young LLP, has  
acted in this role since 2003 pursuant to a competitive tender 
process which took place at that time. There has not been a 
subsequent tender process. The appointment of the auditor 
is reviewed each year and the audit partner changes at least 
every five years in accordance with professional and regulatory 
standards in order to protect independence and objectivity 
and to provide fresh challenge to the business. The last five 
yearly audit rotation took place in 2012. The Committee 
is aware that impending EU legislation will require listed 
companies to rotate their auditor every 10 years. Under the 
transitional arrangements for firms where the tenure was 
between 11 and 20 years on the effective date under the new 
EU rules, there will be a grace period of nine years after the 
enactment of the EU legislation. Accordingly, based upon the 
new legislation, Ernst & Young will not be able to act as auditor 
to the Company after June 2023 so the last financial year that 
they could serve as auditor would end on 31 December 2022. 
The Committee has not decided when to put the audit out to 
tender but will keep this matter under review. There are no 
contractual obligations that restrict the Company’s choice of 
auditor. Other non-audit fees of £1,500 (excluding VAT) paid 
to Ernst & Young LLP relate to their services in the electronic 
filing of tax returns.

ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFICIENCY OF THE EXTERNAL 
AUDIT PROCESS

To assess the effectiveness of the external audit, members of 
the Committee work closely with the Manager to obtain a good 
understanding of the progress and efficiency of the audit.

Feedback in relation to the audit process, and also of the 
effectiveness of the Manager in performing its role, is also 
sought from relevant involved parties, notably the audit 
partner and team. The external auditor is invited to attend 
the Committee meeting at which the annual accounts are 
considered, where they have the opportunity to meet with 
the Committee without representatives of the Manager 
being present.

The effectiveness of the Board and the Manager in the 
external audit process is assessed principally in relation to 
the timely identification and resolution of any process errors 
or control breaches that might impact the Company’s NAVs 
and accounting records. It is also assessed by reference to 
how successfully any issues in respect of areas of accounting 
judgement are identified and resolved, the quality and 
timeliness of papers analysing these judgements, the Board 
and the Manager’s approach to the value of independent 
audit, the booking of any audit adjustments arising and the 
timely provision of draft public documents, for review by the 
auditor and the Committee.

To form a conclusion with regard to the independence of the 
external auditor, the Committee considers whether the skills 
and experience of the auditor make them a suitable supplier 
of any non-audit service and whether there is any threat to 
their objectivity and independence in the conduct of the 
audit resulting from the provision of such services. On an 
annual basis, Ernst & Young LLP review the independence of 
their relationship with the Company and report to the Board, 
providing details of any other relationships with the Manager. 
As part of this review, the Committee also receives information 
about policies and processes for maintaining independence 
and monitoring compliance with relevant requirements from 
the Company’s auditor, including information on the rotation 
of audit partners and staff, and details of any relationships 
between the audit firm and its staff and the Company, as 
well as an overall confirmation from the auditor of their 
independence and objectivity. As a result of their review, 
the Committee has concluded that Ernst & Young LLP is 
independent of the Company and the Manager.

CONCLUSIONS IN RESPECT OF THE ANNUAL 
REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The production and audit of the Company’s Annual Report 
and Financial Statements is a comprehensive process 
requiring input from a number of different contributors. One 
of the key governance requirements of a Company’s financial 
statements is for the Report and Financial Statements to 
be fair, balanced and understandable. In order to reach a 
conclusion on this matter, the Board has requested that the 
Committee advise on whether it considers that the Annual 
Report and Financial Statements fulfils these requirements.

As a result of the work performed, the Committee has 
concluded that the Annual Report for the year ended  
31 December 2015, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced  
and understandable and provides the information necessary 
for shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, 
business model and strategy. The Committee has reported 
on these findings to the Board. The Board’s conclusions 
in this respect are set out in the Statement of Directors’ 
Responsibilities on page 29.

Richard Jewson 
Chairman
Audit Committee 
23 February 2016

28

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITIES

The directors confirm that to the best of their knowledge:

•

•

the financial statements, prepared in accordance with
the applicable accounting standards, give a true and fair
view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit
or loss of the Company; and

the Annual Report includes a fair review of the development
and performance of the business and the position of the
Company, together with a description of the principal
risks and uncertainties that the Company faces.

The UK Corporate Governance Code also requires Directors 
to ensure that the Annual Report and Accounts are fair, 
balanced and understandable. In order to reach a conclusion 
on this matter, the Board has requested that the Audit 
Committee advise on whether it considers that the Annual 
Report and Accounts fulfils these requirements. The process 
by which the Committee has reached these conclusions is set 
out in the Audit Committee’s report on pages 27 and 28. As 
a result, the Board has concluded that the Annual Report for 
the year ended 31 December 2015, taken as a whole, is fair, 
balanced and understandable and provides the information 
necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s 
performance, business model and strategy.

On behalf of the Board

John Reeve 
Chairman
23 February 2016

The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual 
Report, the Report on Directors’ Remuneration and the 
financial statements in accordance with applicable law  
and regulations.

Company law requires the directors to prepare financial 
statements for each financial year. Under that law the 
directors are required to prepare the financial statements in 
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards 
as adopted by the European Union. Under company law the 
directors must not approve the financial statements unless 
they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the 
state of affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss of 
the Company for that period. In preparing these financial 
statements, the directors are required to:

•

select suitable accounting policies in accordance
with IAS8: Accounting Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates and Errors, and then apply
these consistently;

• present information, including accounting policies,

in a manner that provides relevant, reliable,
comparable and understandable information;

• provide additional disclosures when compliance with the

specific requirements in IFRS is insufficient to enable users
to understand the impact of particular transactions, other
events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and
financial performance; and

•

state that the Company has complied with IFRS, subject
to any material departures disclosed and explained in the
financial statements.

The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting 
records which are sufficient to show and explain the 
Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy 
at any time the financial position of the Company and enable 
them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the 
Companies Act 2006 and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. 
They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of 
the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the 
prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The directors are responsible for ensuring that the  
Annual Report includes a fair review of the development 
and performance of the business and the position of the 
Company, together with a description of the principal  
risks and uncertainties it faces.

29

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONINDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 
TO THE MEMBERS OF TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLC

Our opinion on the financial statements
In our opinion:

•

•

•

the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2015 and
of the Company’s loss for the year then ended;

the financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union; and

the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and Article 4
of the IAS Regulation.

What we have audited
Temple Bar Investment Trust PLC’s financial statements comprise:

Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended 31 December 2015

Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 31 December 2015

Statement of Financial Position as at 31 December 2015

Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended 31 December 2015

Related notes 1 to 23 to the financial statements

The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and International Financial 
Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union.

Overview of our audit approach

Risks of material misstatement

•  Incorrect valuation and existence of the investment portfolio.

•   Incomplete or inaccurate income recognition through failure to recognise proper income
entitlements or apply appropriate accounting treatment (Significant risk and Fraud risk).

Audit scope

Materiality

•  We performed an audit of Temple Bar Investment Trust PLC.

•  Materiality of £7.6m which represents 1% of total equity (2014: £7.9m).

Our assessment of risk of material misstatement 
We identified the risks of material misstatement described below as those that had the greatest effect on our overall audit 
strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit and the direction of the efforts of the audit team. In addressing these risks, 
we have performed the procedures below which were designed in the context of the financial statements as a whole and, 
consequently, we do not express any opinion on these individual areas.

Risk

Our response to the risk

What we concluded to the Audit Committee

Incorrect valuation and existence of the 
investment portfolio (as described on page 
27 in the Report of the Audit Committee).

The valuation of the portfolio at 
31 December 2015 was £856m (2014: 
£874m) comprising £778m (2014: £762m) 
of listed equities and £78m (2014: £112m) 
of corporate bonds.

The valuation of the assets held in the 
investment portfolio is the key driver of the 
Company’s net asset value and total return. 
Incorrect asset pricing or a failure to maintain 
proper legal title of the assets held by the 
Company could have a significant impact on 
portfolio valuation and, therefore, the return 
generated for shareholders.

We performed the following 
procedures:

For all investments, we noted no material 
differences in market value or exchange rates.

We have independently valued 100%  
of the investment prices in the portfolio 
using our bespoke asset pricing tool.

We noted no differences between the 
custodian and depositary confirmations and 
the Company’s underlying financial records.

For those investments priced in 
currencies other than sterling we  
have agreed the exchange rates to 
an independent source. 

We independently obtained 
confirmations from the Company’s 
custodian and depositary to confirm 
the existence of the assets held as at 
31 December 2015.

30

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015Risk

Our response to the risk

What we concluded to the Audit Committee

We noted no issues in agreeing the  
sample of dividend and interest receipts 
to and from the independent source.

We noted no issues in agreeing the  
accrued dividend and interest receipts 
to an independent source.

We ensured that the accounting treatment 
adopted for the special dividends was 
consistent with the evidence provided  
and our understanding of the underlying 
circumstances giving rise to the related 
dividends.

Incomplete or inaccurate income 
recognition through failure to recognise 
proper income entitlements or  
apply appropriate accounting  
treatment (Significant and Fraud risk) 
(as described on page 27 in the Report  
of the Audit Committee).

Most of the Company’s income is received  
in the form of dividends and interest from 
fixed income investments, being £30m (2014: 
£27m) and £1m (2014: £3m) respectively for  
the period.

Given the judgemental aspect of allocating 
special dividends between revenue and 
capital and the risk of management override 
from processing of topside journals, we 
consider this an area warranting specific  
audit focus.

We performed the following 
procedures:

We agreed, on a sample basis, 
dividend and interest receipts to 
an independent source.

We agreed, on a sample basis, investee 
company dividend announcements 
and fixed interest coupon dates from 
an independent source to the income 
recorded by the Company. 

We agreed all accrued dividends 
and fixed interest to an independent 
source. 

We performed a walkthrough of the 
process for the allocation of special 
dividends between revenue and capital 
and considered the effectiveness of 
controls in place.

We reviewed the recognition criteria 
applied to the special dividends 
received during the year and  
assessed the appropriateness of the 
conclusion on the relevant treatment 
as documented by the Manager.

In the prior year, our auditor’s report included only a risk of material misstatement in relation to the valuation and existence of 
the investment portfolio. In the current year, we also recognise a risk of material misstatement in relation to the recognition of 
revenue. We have assessed this as a fraud risk and a significant risk this year as investment income receivable by the Company 
during the period directly affects the Company’s ability to pay a dividend to shareholders and judgement is used in allocating 
special dividends between revenue and capital. Potentially, these factors could give the Manager both the incentive and the 
opportunity to misstate the revenue of the Company in order to meet shareholder expectations. 

The scope of our audit 
Our assessment of audit risk, our evaluation of materiality and our allocation of performance materiality determine our audit 
scope for the Company. This enables us to form an opinion on the financial statements. We take into account size, risk profile, the 
organisation of the Company and effectiveness of controls, including controls and changes in the business environment when 
assessing the level of work to be performed. The Company is a single component and we perform a full audit on this Company.

Our application of materiality 
We apply the concept of materiality in planning and performing the audit, in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements 
on the audit and in forming our audit opinion. 

Materiality
The magnitude of an omission or misstatement that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence 
the economic decisions of the users of the financial statements. Materiality provides a basis for determining the nature and 
extent of our audit procedures.

We determined planning materiality for the Company to be £7.6m (2014: £7.9m), which is 1% of total equity. This provided 
a basis for determining the nature, timing and extent of our risk assessment procedures, identifying and assessing the risks 
of material misstatement and determining the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures. We derived our 
materiality calculation from a proportion of total equity as we consider that to be the most important financial metric on  
which shareholders judge the performance of the Company. 

31

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONINDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT CONTINUED
TO THE MEMBERS OF TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLC

Performance materiality
The application of materiality at the individual account or balance level. It is set at an amount to reduce to an appropriately 
low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality.

On the basis of our risk assessments, together with our assessment of the Company’s overall control environment, our 
judgment was that overall performance materiality (i.e. our tolerance for misstatement in an individual account or balance) for 
the Company should be 75% of planning materiality, being £5.7m (2014: £5.9m). Our objective in adopting this approach was 
to ensure that total undetected and uncorrected audit differences in all accounts did not exceed our planning materiality level. 
We have set performance materiality at this percentage due to our past experience of the audit that indicates a lower risk of 
misstatements, both corrected and uncorrected. 

Given the importance of the distinction between revenue and capital for the Company we also applied a separate testing 
threshold of £1.3m (2014: £1.2m) for the revenue column of the Income Statement, being 5% of the return on ordinary activities 
before taxation. 

Reporting threshold
An amount below which identified misstatements are considered as being clearly trivial.

We agreed with the audit committee that we would report all audit differences in excess of £0.4m (2014: £0.4m) as well as 
differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.

We evaluate any uncorrected misstatements against both the quantitative measures of materiality discussed above and in 
the light of other relevant qualitative considerations.

Scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give 
reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. This 
includes an assessment of: whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances and have been 
consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors; 
and the overall presentation of the financial statements. In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information in 
the Annual Report to identify material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements and to identify any information 
that is apparently materially incorrect based on, or materially inconsistent with, the knowledge acquired by us in the course 
of performing the audit. If we become aware of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the 
implications for our report.

Respective responsibilities of directors and auditor
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities set out on page 29, the directors are responsible for the 
preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit 
and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing 
(UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board’s Ethical Standards for Auditors.

This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies 
Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are 
required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not 
accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, 
for this report, or for the opinions we have formed. 

Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion:

•

•

the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the
Companies Act 2006; and

the information given in the Strategic Report and the Directors’ Report for the financial year for which the financial
statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements.

32

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015Matters on which we are required to report by exception

ISAs (UK and  
Ireland) reporting

We are required to report to you if, in our opinion, financial and non-financial 
information in the annual report is: 

We have no 
exceptions to report.

•  materially inconsistent with the information in the audited financial statements; or

•  apparently materially incorrect based on, or materially inconsistent with, our

knowledge of the Company acquired in the course of performing our audit; or

• otherwise misleading.

In particular, we are required to report whether we have identified any inconsistencies 
between our knowledge acquired in the course of performing the audit and the 
directors’ statement that they consider the annual report and accounts taken as a 
whole is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary 
for shareholders to assess the entity’s performance, business model and strategy; 
and whether the annual report appropriately addresses those matters that we 
communicated to the audit committee that we consider should have been disclosed.

We are required to report to you if, in our opinion:

•  adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Company, or returns

adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or

•  the Company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report

to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or

•  certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or

•  we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.

We are required to review:

•  the directors’ statement in relation to going concern set out on page 19, and

longer term viability, set out on page 14; and

•  the part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Company’s

compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified
for our review

Companies Act 
2006 reporting

Listing Rules review 
requirements

Statement on the Directors’ Assessment of the Principal Risks that Would Threaten 
the Solvency or Liquidity of the Entity

ISAs (UK and  
Ireland) reporting

We are required to give a statement as to whether we have anything material to add or 
to draw attention to in relation to:

•  the directors’ confirmation in the annual report that they have carried out a robust

assessment of the principal risks facing the entity, including those that would threaten
its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity;

•  the disclosures in the annual report that describe those risks and explain how they are

being managed or mitigated;

•  the directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether they considered it
appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing them, and
their identification of any material uncertainties to the entity’s ability to continue to do
so over a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial
statements; and

•  the directors’ explanation in the annual report as to how they have assessed the

prospects of the entity, over what period they have done so and why they consider that
period to be appropriate, and their statement as to whether they have a reasonable
expectation that the entity will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities
as they fall due over the period of their assessment, including any related disclosures
drawing attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions.

Ashley Coups (Senior statutory auditor)
for and on behalf of Ernst & Young LLP, Statutory Auditor
London

23 February 2016

We have no 
exceptions to report.

We have no 
exceptions to report.

We have nothing 
material to add or to 
draw attention to.

33

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATION34

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015I

S
T
R
A
T
E
G
C
R
E
P
O
R
T

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
R
E
P
O
R
T

I

I

F
N
A
N
C
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

S
H
A
R
E
H
O
L
D
E
R

I

N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N

35

FINANCIAL REPORT

36   Statement of Comprehensive Income

37   Statement of Changes in Equity

38   Statement of Financial Position

39   Statement of Cash Flows

40   Notes to the Financial Statements

GOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONSTRATEGIC REPORTTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015 
 
 
 
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015

Investment Income

Other operating income

Losses on investments

Notes

4

4

Revenue
£000

31,243

10

31,253

2015

Capital
£000

–

–

–

Total 
£000

31,243

10

Revenue
£000

30,262

12

31,253

30,274

2014

Capital
£000

–

–

–

Total 
£000

30,262

12

30,274

Losses on investments held at fair value 
through profit or loss

12(b)

Total income

Expenses

Management fees

Other expenses

Profit/(loss) before finance costs and tax

Finance costs

Profit/(loss) before tax

Tax

–

31,253

(31,615)

(31,615)

(31,615)

–

(362)

30,274

(29,867)

(29,867)

(29,867)

407

6

7

8

9

(1,374)

(581)

29,298

(2,635)

26,663

–

(1,980)

(1,282)

(34,877)

(4,000)

(38,877)

–

(3,354)

(1,863)

(5,579)

(6,635)

(12,214)

–

(1,315)

(538)

28,421

(2,639)

25,782

–

(1,938)

(1,009)

(32,814)

(3,999)

(36,813)

–

(3,253)

(1,547)

(4,393)

(6,638)

(11,031)

–

Profit/(loss) for the year

26,663

(38,877)

(12,214)

25,782

(36,813)

(11,031)

Earnings per share (basic and diluted)

11

39.87p

(58.14p)

(18.27p)

39.82p

(56.86p)

(17.04p)

The total column of this statement represents the Statement of Comprehensive Income prepared in accordance with IFRS.  
The supplementary revenue return and capital return columns are both prepared under guidance issued by the Association 
of Investment Companies. All items in the above statement derive from continuing operations.

No operations were acquired or discontinued during the year.

The Company does not have any income or expense that is not included in net profit for the year. Accordingly, the 
net profit for the year is also the Total Comprehensive Income for the Year, as defined in IAS1 (revised).

The notes on pages 40 to 50 form an integral part of the financial statements.

36

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015

Balance at 1 January 2014

Unclaimed dividends

(Loss)/profit for the year

Issue of share capital

Notes

Ordinary 
share capital 
£000

15,831

Share 
premium 
account 
£000

54,002

–

–

42,038

–

Capital 
reserves 
£000

689,117

–

(36,813)

–

–

–

–

888

–

Dividends paid to equity shareholders

10

Balance at 31 December 2014

16,719

96,040

652,304

Unclaimed dividends

(Loss)/profit for the year

Issue of share capital

Dividends paid to equity shareholders

10

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(38,877)

–

–

Balance at 31 December 2015

16,719

96,040

613,427

Retained 
earnings 
£000

Total 
equity 
£000

33,120

792,070

17

25,782

–

(24,538)

34,381

35

26,663

–

(31,510)

29,569

17

(11,031)

42,926

(24,538)

799,444

35

(12,214)

–

(31,510)

755,755

As at 31 December 2015 the Company had distributable revenue reserves of £29,569,000 (2014: £34,381,000) for the payment 
of future dividends. The only distributable reserves are the retained earnings and realised capital reserves.

The notes on pages 40 to 50 form an integral part of the financial statements.

37

GOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONSTRATEGIC REPORTTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2015

Non-current assets

Investments held at fair value through profit or loss

Current assets

Receivables

Cash and cash equivalents

Total assets

Current liabilities

Payables

Total assets less current liabilities

Non-current liabilities

Interest bearing borrowings

Net assets

Equity attributable to equity holders

Ordinary share capital

Share premium

Capital reserves

Retained earnings

Total equity

Net asset value per share

31 December 2015

31 December 2014

Notes

£000

£000

£000

£000

12

13

14

15

16

17

18 

20

855,625

873,781

2,722

12,262

3,256

37,225

14,984

870,609

(1,074)

869,535

(113,780)

755,755

40,481

914,262

(1,064)

913,198

(113,754)

799,444

16,719

96,040

613,427

29,569

16,719

96,040

652,304

34,381

755,755

755,755

1,130.14p

799,444

799,444

1,195.47p

The notes on pages 40 to 50 form an integral part of the financial statements.

The financial statements on pages 36 to 50 were approved by the board of directors and authorised for issue on 
23 February 2016. They were signed on its behalf by:

J Reeve
Chairman

38

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015

Cash flows from operating activities

Loss before tax

Adjustments for:

Purchases of investments1

Sales of investments1

Losses on investments

Financing costs

Operating cash flows before movements in working capital

Increase/(decrease) in accrued interest

Increase in accrued dividend income

(Decrease)/increase in receivables

Increase/(decrease) in payables

Net cash flows from operating activities before 
and after income tax

Cash flows from financing activities 

Proceeds from issue of new shares

Issue costs relating to 4.05% Private Placement Loan

Unclaimed dividends

Interest paid on borrowings

Equity dividends paid

Net cash used in financing activities

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at the start of the year

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

2015

2014

Notes

£000

£000

£000

£000

(12,214)

(11,031)

(360,358)

346,899

(305,944)

291,681

12(b)

8

10

(13,459)

31,615

6,635

12,577

743

10

(219)

10

13,121

–

(24)

35

(6,585)

(31,510)

(38,084)

(24,963)

37,225

12,262

(14,263)

29,867

6,638

11,211

(835)

757

909

(460)

11,582

42,926

(313)

17

(6,588)

(24,538)

11,504

23,086

14,139

37,225

1 Purchases and sales of investments are considered to be operating activities of the Company, given its purpose, rather than investing activities. 

The notes on pages 40 to 50 form an integral part of the financial statements.

Certain comparative figures have been dis-aggregated to provide more detailed information in line with the current 
presentation adopted. There was no impact on the comparative net profit or net losses as a result of the new presentation.

39

GOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONSTRATEGIC REPORTTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of accounting
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’), which 
comprise standards and interpretations approved by the International Accounting Standards Board (‘IASB’), and International 
Accounting Standards and Standing Interpretations Committee interpretations approved by the International Accounting 
Standards Committee (‘IASC’) that remain in effect, and to the extent that they have been adopted by the European Union.

The principal accounting policies adopted by the Company are set out below. Where presentational guidance set out in the 
Statement of Recommended Practice (‘SORP’) for investment trusts issued by the Association of Investment Companies (‘AIC’) 
in November 2014 is consistent with the requirements of IFRS, the directors have sought to prepare the financial statements on 
a basis compliant with the recommendations of the SORP.

All values are rounded to the nearest thousand pounds unless otherwise indicated.

Presentation of Statement of Comprehensive Income 
In order better to reflect the activities of an investment trust company and in accordance with guidance issued by the AIC, 
supplementary information which analyses the Statement of Comprehensive Income between items of a revenue and capital 
nature has been presented alongside the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Income
Dividend income from investments is recognised when the Company’s right to receive payment has been established, 
normally the ex-dividend date.

Where the Company has elected to receive its dividends in the form of additional shares rather than cash, the amount of 
cash dividend foregone is recognised as income. Any excess in the value of shares received over the amount of cash dividend 
foregone is recognised as a gain in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Interest income is accrued on a time basis, by reference to the principal outstanding and at the effective interest rate 
applicable, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial 
asset to that asset’s net carrying amount.

Special dividends are credited to capital or revenue according to their circumstances.

Foreign Currency
The financial statements are prepared in Pounds Sterling because that is the currency of the primary economic environment in 
which the Company operates.

The primary objective of the Company is to generate returns in Pounds Sterling, its capital-raising currency. The liquidity of the 
Company is managed on a day-to-day basis in Sterling as the Company’s performance is evaluated in that currency. Therefore, 
the directors consider Pounds Sterling as the currency that most faithfully represents the economic effects of the underlying 
transactions, events and conditions.

Transactions involving foreign currencies are converted at the exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Foreign 
currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated into Pounds Sterling at the exchange rate ruling on the year-end date. 
Foreign exchange differences arising on translation are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Expenses
All expenses are accounted for on the accruals basis. In respect of the analysis between revenue and capital items presented 
within the Statement of Comprehensive Income, all expenses have been presented as revenue items except as follows:

•

Transaction costs which are incurred on the purchases or sales of investments designated as fair value through
profit or loss are expensed to capital in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

• Expenses are split and presented partly as capital items where a connection with the maintenance or enhancement of the

value of the investments held can be demonstrated and, accordingly, the investment management fee and finance costs
have been allocated 40% to revenue and 60% to capital, in order to reflect the directors’ long term view of the nature of
the expected investment returns of the Company.

Taxation
The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax. The tax currently payable is based on the 
taxable profit for the year. The taxable profit differs from profit before tax as reported in the Statement of Comprehensive 
Income because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes 
items that are never taxable or deductible. The Company’s liability for current tax is calculated using a blended rate as 
applicable throughout the year.

In line with the recommendations of the SORP, the allocation method used to calculate tax relief on expenses presented 
against capital returns in the supplementary information in the Statement of Comprehensive Income is the ‘marginal basis’. 
Under this basis, if taxable income is capable of being entirely offset by expenses in the revenue column of the income 
statement, then no tax relief is transferred to the capital return column.

40

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on differences between the carrying amounts of assets 
and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit and 
is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary 
differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against 
which deductible temporary differences can be utilised.

Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is 
realised. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the revenue return column of the Statement of Comprehensive Income, except 
when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity.

Investment trusts which have approval under Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are not liable for taxation on 
capital gains.

Irrecoverable withholding tax is recognised on any overseas dividends on an accruals basis using the applicable rate for the 
country of origin.

Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised in the Statement of Financial Position when the Company becomes a 
party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. The Company shall offset financial assets and financial liabilities if it has a 
legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts and interests and intends to settle on a net basis. Financial assets 
and liabilities are derecognised when the Company settles its obligations relating to the instrument.

Receivables
Receivables do not carry any interest, are short term in nature and are accordingly stated at their nominal value as reduced  
by appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts.

Investments
Investments held at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognised at fair value, being the consideration given and 
excluding transaction or other dealing costs associated with the investment.

After initial recognition, investments are measured at fair value through profit or loss. Gains or losses on investments measured 
at fair value through profit or loss are included in net profit or loss as a capital item and transaction costs on acquisition or 
disposal of investments are expensed. For investments that are actively traded in organised financial markets, fair value is 
determined by reference to stock exchange quoted market bid prices at the close of business on the year-end date.

All purchases and sales of investments are recognised on the trade date, i.e. the date that the Company commits to purchase 
or sell an asset.

Financial liabilities and equity instruments
Financial liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. An 
equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Company after deducting all of its liabilities.

Interest bearing borrowings
Interest bearing borrowings, being the debenture stocks and loan issued by the Company, are initially recognised at a carrying 
value equivalent to the proceeds received net of issue costs associated with the borrowings. After initial recognition, interest 
bearing borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. The fair value is 
determined by reference to quoted market mid prices at close of business on the year-end date.

Payables
Payables are non interest bearing and are stated at their nominal value.

Equity dividends payable
Equity dividends payable are recognised when the shareholders’ right to receive payment is established.

Finance costs
Interest payable on the debenture stocks and loan in issue is accrued on the effective interest rate basis. In accordance 
with the expected long term division of returns, 40% of the interest for the year is charged to revenue, and the other 60% is 
charged to capital, net of any incremental corporation tax relief.

Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents (which are presented as a single class of asset on the Statement of Financial Position) comprise cash 
at bank and in hand and deposits with an original maturity of three months or less.

The carrying value of these assets approximates their fair value.

41

GOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONSTRATEGIC REPORTTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 20152  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS, ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS

The preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires the directors to make judgements, estimates and assumptions 
that affect the reported amounts recognised in the financial statements and disclosure of contingent liabilities. However, 
uncertainty about these assumptions and estimates could result in outcomes that could require a material adjustment to the 
carrying amount of the asset or liability affected in future periods. There have been no significant judgements, estimates or 
assumptions for the current or preceding financial year.

3  ADOPTION OF NEW AND REVISED STANDARDS 

At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, the following Standards and Interpretations, which have not been 
applied in these financial statements, were in issue but were not yet effective (and in some cases had not yet been adopted by 
the European Union):

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments 
IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27 (amended) Investment Entities 
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers

The Company does not believe that there will be a material impact on the financial statements from the adoption of these 
standards/interpretations.

4 

INCOME

Income from investments

UK dividends

UK REITs

Overseas dividends

Interest from fixed interest securities

Other income

Deposit interest

Total income

Investment income comprises:

Listed investments

5  SEGMENTAL REPORTING

2015 
£000

2014 
£000

27,212

749

1,958

1,324

31,243

10

31,253

31,243

31,243

25,542

601

1,282

2,837

30,262

12

30,274

30,262

30,262

The directors are of the opinion that the Company is engaged in a single segment of business being investment business.

6 

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FEE

Investment management fee

AIFM fee

Secretarial fee

2015

Capital
£000

1,902

78

–

Revenue
£000

1,268

52

54

1,374

1,980

2014

Capital
£000

1,902

36

–

Revenue
£000

1,268

23

24

Total 
£000

3,170

59

24

1,315

1,938

3,253

Total 
£000

3,170

130

54

3,354

As at 31 December 2015 an amount of £761,789 (2014: £799,930) was payable to the Manager in relation to the management 
fees for the quarter ended 31 December 2015.

Details of the terms of the investment management agreement are provided on page 19.

42

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 20157  OTHER EXPENSES

Transaction costs on fair value  
through profit or loss assets1

Directors’ fees (see Report on  
Directors Remuneration on page 22)

Registrar’s fees

AIC membership costs

Marketing costs

Printing & postage

Directors’ liability insurance

Auditor’s remuneration – annual audit2

– non audit fee

Stock exchange fees

FCA fee

Depositary fee

Safe custody fees

Other expenses

Revenue
£000

2015

Capital
£000

Total 
£000

Revenue
£000

–

160

111

21

29

35

14

30

2

24

22

87

15

31

1,282

1,282

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

160

111

21

29

35

14

30

2

24

22

87

15

31

–

154

104

21

25

52

15

28

2

23

20

42

18

34

2014

Capital
£000

Total 
£000

1,009

1,009

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

154

104

21

25

52

15

28

2

23

20

42

18

34

581

1,282

1,863

538

1,009

1,547

1 

 Transaction costs on fair value through profit or loss assets represent such costs incurred on both the purchase and sale of those assets. 
Transaction costs on purchases amounted to £1,147,897 (2014: £880,741) and on sales amounted to £134,285 (2014: £128,156).

2   During the year there were audit fees of £25,000 (2014: £23,500) (excluding VAT) paid to the Auditor. 

All expenses are inclusive of VAT where applicable. Certain comparative figures have been dis-aggregated to provide more 
detailed information in line with the current presentation adopted. There was no impact on the comparative net profit or net 
losses as a result of the new presentation.

8  FINANCE COSTS

Interest on borrowings

9.875% debenture stock 2017

5.5% debenture stock 2021

4.05% Private placement loan 20281

Bank interest payable

Total finance costs

Revenue
£000

2015

Capital
£000

Total 
£000

Revenue
£000

988

836

810

2,634

1

2,635

1,481

1,272

1,247

4,000

–

4,000

2,469

2,108

2,057

6,634

1

6,635

988

836

810

2,634

5

2,639

2014

Capital
£000

1,481

1,272

1,246

3,999

–

3,999

Total 
£000

2,469

2,108

2,056

6,633

5

6,638

The amortisation of the debenture and loan issue costs is calculated using the effective interest method.

1  The 4.05% Private Placement Loan contains the following principal financial or other covenants, with which failure to comply could necessitate the early repayment of the loan:

•  net tangible assets of at least £275 million

•  aggregate principal amount of financial indebtedness not to exceed 50% of net tangible assets

•  prior approval by the note holder of any change of Manager

•  prior approval by the note holder of any change in the Company’s investment objectives and policies

43

GOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONSTRATEGIC REPORTTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 20159  TAXATION

(a) There is no corporation tax payable (2014:nil).

(b) The charge for the year can be reconciled to the profit per the Statement of Comprehensive Income as follows:

Profit/(loss) before taxation

Tax at UK corporation tax rate of 20.25% 
(2014:21.50%)

Tax effects of:

Non-taxable gains on investments

Disallowed expenses

Non-taxable UK dividends1

Income taxable in later periods

Non-taxable overseas dividends1

Increase in excess management expenses 
in the year2

Total tax charge for the year

Revenue
£000

26,663

2015

Capital
£000

(38,877)

Total 
£000

Revenue
£000

(12,214)

25,782

2014

Capital
£000

(36,813)

Total 
£000

(11,031)

5,430

(7,871)

(2,441)

5,543

(7,914)

(2,371)

–

–

(5,521)

–

(454)

545

–

6,401

259

–

–

–

1,211

–

6,401

259

(5,521)

–

(454)

1,756

–

–

–

(5,491)

(16)

(276)

240

–

6,421

217

–

–

–

1,276

–

6,421

217

(5,491)

(16)

(276)

1,516

–

1 Investment trusts are not subject to corporation tax on these items.

2  The Company has not recognised a deferred tax asset of £13,225,300 (2014: £12,960,000) based on an effective tax rate of 20.0% (2014: 20.0%) arising as a result of having 

unutilised management expenses since, under current tax legislation, it is unlikely that the Company will obtain any benefit for the asset.

10  DIVIDENDS

Amounts recognised as distributions to equity holders in the year

Final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2014 of 23.33p (2013: 22.65p) per share 

Interim dividends (three) for the year ended 31 December 2015 of 7.93p (2014: single payment of 15.55p) per share

2015 
£000

2014 
£000

15,601

15,909

31,510

14,395

10,143

24,538

Proposed final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2015 of 15.87p (2014: 23.33p) per share

10,613

15,601

The proposed final dividend is subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting and has not  
been included as a liability in these financial statements. In 2015 the Company adopted a policy of paying dividends on a 
quarterly basis. As all three interim dividends paid during the year are reflected in the above 2015 numbers the comparison 
with 2014 has been slightly distorted. In 2014 only the single interim dividend payment made during the year was included. 
Therefore, also set out below is the total dividend payable in respect of these financial years, which is the basis on which the 
requirements of Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are considered.

Interim dividends (three) for the year ended 31 December 2015 of 7.93p (2014: single payment of 15.55p) per share

Proposed final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2015 of 15.87p (2014: 23.33p) per share

11  EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings per ordinary share

Revenue
pence

39.87p

2015

Capital
pence

(58.14p)

Total 
pence

(18.27p)

Revenue
pence

39.82

2015 
£000

15,909

10,613

26,522

2014

Capital
pence

(56.86)

2014 
£000

10,143

15,601

25,744

Total 
pence

(17.04)

The calculation of the above is based on revenue returns of £26,663,000 (2014: £25,782,000), capital returns of (£38,877,000) 
(2014: (£36,813,000)) and total returns of (£12,214,000) (2014: (£11,031,000)) and a weighted average number of ordinary shares 
of 66,872,765 (2014: 64,742,831).

44

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 201512  INVESTMENTS HELD AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS

(a) Movements in the year

Opening cost at 1 January 

Investment holding gains at 1 January

Opening fair value

Purchases at cost

Sales – proceeds

– realised gains on sales

Decrease in investment holding gains

Closing fair value at 31 December

Closing cost at 31 December

Investment holding gains at 31 December

(b) Gains on investments

Gains on sales of investments on book cost

Decrease in investment holding gains

All investments are listed.

2015 
£000

2014 
£000

743,492

651,383

130,289

238,002

873,781

889,385

360,358

305,944

(346,899)

(291,681)

58,358

77,846

(89,973)

(107,713)

855,625

873,781

815,311

743,492

40,314

130,289

855,625

873,781

58,358

77,846

(89,973)

(107,713)

(31,615)

(29,867)

(c) Fair value of financial instruments
The following table shows financial instruments recognised at fair value, analysed between those whose fair value is based on:

•

•

•

Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.

Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayments,
credit risk, etc). There are no level 2 financial assets (2014: £nil).

Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Company’s own assumptions in determining the fair
value of investments). There are no level 3 financial assets (2014: £nil).

The following is a summary of the classifications used as at 31 December 2015 in valuing the Company’s financial instruments:

Financial assets

Quoted equities

Debt securities

2015

2014

Level 1
£000

Total
£000

Level 1
£000

Total
£000

777,507

777,507

761,684

761,684

78,118

78,118

112,097

112,097

855,625

855,625

873,781

873,781

Please refer to Note 22 on page 49 for the disclosure and fair value categorisation of the financial liabilities.

45

GOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONSTRATEGIC REPORTTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 201513  RECEIVABLES

Accrued income

Other receivables

2015 
£000

2,437

285

2,722

2014 
£000

3,190

66

3,256

The above receivables do not carry any interest and are short term in nature. The directors consider that the carrying values 
of these receivables approximate their fair value.

14  PAYABLES

Accruals and deferred income

2015 
£000

1,074

1,074

2014 
£000

1,064

1,064

The above payables do not carry any interest and are short term in nature. The directors consider that the carrying values 
of these payables approximate their fair value.

15  NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES

Interest bearing borrowings

Amounts payable after more than one year:

9.875% Debenture stock 2017

5.5% Debenture stock 2021

4.05% Private placement loan 2028

2015 
£000

2014 
£000

25,000

38,491

50,289

25,000

38,506

50,248

113,780

113,754

The 9.875% Debenture stock 2017 is secured by a floating charge over the assets of the Company. The stock is repayable 
at par on 31 December 2017. No issue costs were capitalised on the issue of this debenture.

The 5.5% Debenture stock 2021 is secured by a floating charge over the assets of the Company. The stock is repayable at 
par on 8 March 2021.

The 4.05% Private Placement Loan is secured by a floating charge over the assets of the Company. The loan is repayable at 
par on 3 September 2028.

16  ORDINARY SHARE CAPITAL

Issued, allotted and fully paid

Ordinary shares of 25p each

There were no shares issued during 2015 (2014: 3,549,517) 

17  SHARE PREMIUM

Balance at 1 January 2015

Premium arising on issue of new shares

Balance at 31 December 2015

2015 
Number

2014 
Number

2015 
£000

2014 
£000

66,872,765

66,872,765

16,718,191

16,718,191

2015 
£000

96,040

–

96,040

2014 
£000

54,002

42,038

96,040

46

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 201518   CAPITAL RESERVES

The capital reserves comprise both realised and unrealised gains. A summary of the split is shown below.

Capital reserves – realised

Capital reserves – unrealised

2015 
£000

573,113

40,314

613,427

2014 
£000

522,015

130,289

652,304

19  CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL COMMITMENTS

As at 31 December 2015 there were no contingent liabilities or capital commitments for the Company (2014: £nil).

20   NET ASSET VALUES

Ordinary shares of 25p each

Net asset 
value per 
ordinary share 
Pence

Net assets 
attributable 
£000

1,130.14p

755,755

The net asset value per ordinary share is based on net assets at the year-end of £755,755,000 (2014: £799,444,000) and on 
66,872,765 (2014: 66,872,765) ordinary shares in issue at the year-end.

21   RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH THE MANAGER

IAS 24 ‘Related party disclosures’ requires the disclosure of the details of material transactions between the Company and any 
related parties. Accordingly, the disclosures required are set out below:

Directors – The remuneration of the directors is set out in the Report on Directors’ Remuneration on page 22. There were no 
contracts subsisting during or at the end of the year in which a director of the Company is or was interested and which are 
or were significant in relation to the Company’s business. There were no other material transactions during the year with the 
directors of the Company.

At 31 December 2015 there was £40,797 (2014: £37,989) payable to the directors for fees and expenses.

Manager – Investec Fund Managers Limited is the Alternative Investment Fund Manager of the Company and has delegated 
portfolio management to Investec Asset Management Limited, the previous Manager. Details of the services provided by the 
Manager and the fees paid are given on pages 19 and 42.

47

GOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONSTRATEGIC REPORTTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 201522   RISK MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company’s investing activities undertaken in pursuit of its investment objective, as set out on page 11, involve certain 
inherent risks. The main financial risks arising from the Company’s financial instruments are market price risk, interest rate 
risk, liquidity risk, credit risk and currency risk. The Board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks as 
summarised below. These policies have remained substantially unchanged during the current and preceding periods.

Market price risk
Market price risk arises mainly from uncertainty about future prices of financial instruments used in the Company’s business. It 
represents the potential loss the Company might suffer through holding market positions in the face of price movements. The Board 
meets on seven scheduled occasions in each year and at each meeting it receives sufficient financial and statistical information 
to enable it to monitor adequately the investment performance and status of the business. In addition, financial information is 
circulated to the directors on a monthly basis. The Board has also established a series of investment parameters, which are reviewed 
annually, designed to limit the risk inherent in managing a portfolio of investments. The Company’s borrowings have the effect 
of increasing the market risk faced by shareholders. This gearing effect is such that, for example, for a 10% movement in the 
valuation of the Company’s investments, the net assets attributable to shareholders would move by approximately 11.3%.

Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk of movements in the value of financial instruments or interest income cash flows that arise as a  
result of fluctuations in interest rates. The Company finances its operations through retained profits including capital profits, 
and additional financing is obtained through the two debenture stocks in issue and the Private Placement Loan, on all of  
which interest is paid at a fixed rate.

Liquidity risk
The Company’s assets comprise mainly readily realisable securities, which can be sold to meet funding commitments if 
necessary. Short term flexibility is achieved through the use of cash balances and short term bank deposits.

Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation and cause the other party to 
incur a financial loss. This is mitigated by the Manager reviewing the credit ratings of broker counterparties. The risk attached 
to dividend flows is mitigated by the Manager’s research of potential investee companies. The Company’s custodian is 
responsible for the collection of income on behalf of the Company. Cash is held either with reputable banks with high quality 
external credit ratings or in liquidity/cash funds providing a spread of exposures to various underlying banks in order to 
diversify risk. The full portfolio can be found on pages 16 to 17.

Currency risk
The income and capital value of the Company’s investments and liabilities can be affected by exchange rate movements as 
some of the Company’s assets and income are denominated in currencies other than Pounds Sterling which is the Company’s 
reporting currency. The key areas where foreign currency risk could have an impact on the Company are:

• movements in rates that would affect the value of investments and liabilities; and

• movements in rates that would affect the income received.

The Company had the following currency exposures, all of which are included in the Statement of Financial Position at fair 
value based on the exchange rates ruling at the respective year-ends. They are not representative of the currency exposures 
during the year as a whole.

31 December 2015

Investments 
£000

Cash 
£000

Receivables 
£000

Payables 
£000

49,631

55,003

750,991

855,625

236

–

12,026

12,262

124

1,102

1,496

2,722

–

–

(1,074)

(1,074)

31 December 2014

Investments 
£000

Cash 
£000

Receivables 
£000

Payables 
£000

63,171

52,445

758,165

873,781

–

2

37,223

37,225

–

–

3,256

3,256

–

–

(1,064)

(1,064)

Non-current 
liabilities 
£000

–

–

(113,780)

(113,780)

Non-current 
liabilities 
£000

–

–

(113,754)

(113,754)

Total 
£000

49,991

56,105

649,659

755,755

Total 
£000

63,171

52,447

683,826

799,444

Euro

US Dollar

Pounds Sterling

Euro

US Dollar

Pounds Sterling

48

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015Foreign currency sensitivity
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the profit after tax for the year and the net assets for the year in relation to 
foreign exchange movements in Euro and US Dollar. The Company mitigates some of the currency risk through the use of 
forward currency contracts. The analysis below assumes that the Euro and US Dollar exchange rates may move +/-2% against 
Pounds Sterling.

There were no forward currency contracts used during 2015.

Projected movement

Effect on net assets for the year

Effect on capital return

£000

+2%

2,122

2,093

£000

-2%

(2,122)

(2,093)

Financial assets – Interest rate risk
The majority of the Company’s financial assets are equity shares and other investments which neither pay interest nor have a 
maturity date. The Company’s fixed interest holdings have a market value of £78,118,000, representing 10.34% of net assets of 
£755,755,000 (2014: £112,097,000; 14.0%). The weighted average running yield as at 31 December 2015 was 4.9% (2014: 5.0%) 
and the weighted average remaining life was 2.0 years (2014: 3.4 years). The Company’s cash balance of £12,262,000 (2014: 
£37,225,000) earns interest, calculated on a tiered basis, depending on the balance held, by reference to the base rate.

If the bank base rate had increased by 0.5%, the impact on the profit or loss and net assets would have been a positive £61,309 
(2014: £186,124). If the bank base rate had decreased by 0.5%, the impact on the profit or loss and net assets would have been 
a negative £61,309 (2014: negative £186,124). The calculations are based on the cash balances at the respective balance sheet 
dates and are not representative of the year as a whole.

Financial liabilities – Interest rate risk
All of the Company’s financial liabilities of £114,854,000 (2014: £114,818,000) are denominated in Pounds Sterling. All current liabilities 
have no interest rate and are repayable within one year. The 9.875% debenture stock, the 5.5% debenture stock and the 4.05% 
Private Placement Loan, which are repayable in 2017, 2021 and 2028 respectively, pay interest at fixed rates. The weighted average 
period until maturity of the loans is 8 years (2014: 9 years) and the weighted average interest rate payable is 6.0% (2014: 6.0%) p.a.

Other price risk exposure
If the investment valuation fell by 10% at 31 December 2015, the impact on profit or loss and net assets would have been 
negative £85.6 million (2014: negative £87.4 million). If the investment portfolio valuation rose by 10% at 31 December 2015, 
the impact on profit or loss and net assets would have been positive £85.6 million (2014: positive £87.4 million). The calculations 
are based on the portfolio valuations as at the respective year-end dates and are not representative of the year as a whole.

The Company held the following categories of financial instruments, all of which are included in the Statement of Financial 
Position at fair value or an approximation to fair value, with the exception of interest bearing borrowings which are shown at 
book value at 31 December 2015.

Assets at fair value through profit or loss

Cash

Loans and receivables

Investment income receivable

Other receivables

Payables

Interest bearing borrowings:

9.875% Debenture Stock1

5.5% Debenture Stock2

4.05% Private Placement Loan3

1 Effective interest rate is 9.875% 
2 Effective interest rate is 5.583% 
3 Effective interest rate is 4.133%

2015

2014

Book value 
£000

Fair value
£000

Book value 
£000

855,625

12,262

855,625

12,262

873,781

37,225

Fair value
£000

873,781

37,225

2,437

285

(1,074)

(25,000)

(38,491)

(50,289)

2,437

285

(1,074)

(28,568)

(43,010)

(52,018)

3,190

66

(1,064)

(25,000)

(38,506)

(50,248)

3,190

66

(1,064)

(30,638)

(44,339)

(52,765)

755,755

745,939

799,444

785,456

The 9.875% Debenture Stock 2017 and the 5.5% Debenture Stock 2021 are classified as Level 1 instruments (2014: Level 1).

The 4.05% Private Placement Loan 2028 is classified as a Level 2 instrument (2014: Level 2).

49

GOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONSTRATEGIC REPORTTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 201522  RISK MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CONTINUED

Liquidity risk exposure
This is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial liabilities.

Contractual maturities of the financial liabilities at the year end, based on the earliest date on which payment can be 
required, are as follows:

2015

2014

Three 
months 
or less 
£000

Not more 
than one 
year 
£000

More 
than one 
year 
£000

Three 
months 
or less 
£000

Not more 
than one 
year 
£000

More 
than one 
year 
£000

Total 
£000

Total 
£000

Creditors: amounts falling due 
after more than one year

Debenture stocks and Loan

2,058

6,584

155,759

164,401

2,058

6,584

155,758

164,400

Creditors: amounts falling due 
within one year

Accruals and deferred income

766

2,824

308

–

1,074

6,892

155,759

165,475

812

2,870

252

–

1,064

6,836

155,758

165,464

Capital management policies and procedures
The Company’s capital management objectives are to ensure that it will be able to continue as a going concern, 
and to provide long term growth in revenue and capital, principally by investment in UK securities.

The Company’s capital is its equity share capital and reserves that are shown in the Statement of Financial Position and 
debentures and fixed term loan (see note 15) at a total of £869,535,000 (2014: £913,198,000).

The Company is subject to several externally imposed capital requirements:

•

•

•

as a public company, the Company has a minimum share capital of £50,000.

in order to be able to pay dividends out of profits available for distribution by way of dividends, the Company has
to be able to meet one of the two capital restriction tests imposed on investment companies by company law.

the terms of the debenture trust deeds have various covenants that prescribe that moneys borrowed should not exceed the
adjusted total capital and reserves as defined in the debenture trust deeds. The Note Purchase Agreement governing the
terms of the Private Placement Loan also contains certain financial covenants. These are measured in accordance with the
policies used in the annual financial statements.

The Company has complied with all of the above requirements.

23  ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUND MANAGERS (AIFM) DIRECTIVE

In accordance with the AIFM Directive, information in relation to the Company’s leverage and the remuneration of the 
Company’s AIFM, Investec Fund Managers Limited, is required to be made available to investors. In accordance with the 
Directive, the AIFM remuneration policy is available from the Company Secretary on request (see contact details on page 59) 
and the numerical remuneration disclosures in respect of the AIFM’s first relevant reporting period (year ended 31 March 2016) 
will be made available in due course.

For the purposes of the AIFM Directive, leverage is any method which increases the Company’s exposure, including the 
borrowing of cash and the use of derivatives. It is expressed as a ratio between the Company’s exposure and its net asset 
value and can be calculated on a gross and a commitment method. Under the gross method, exposure represents the sum of 
the Company’s positions after the deduction of sterling cash balances, without taking into account any hedging and netting 
arrangements. Under the commitment method, exposure is calculated without the deduction of sterling cash balances and 
after certain hedging and netting positions are offset against each other. The Company’s maximum and actual leverage levels 
at 31 December 2015 are shown below:

Leverage Exposure

Maximum limit

Actual

50

Gross 
method

Commitment 
method

250%

114%

200%

115%

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015NOTICE OF MEETING

THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in any doubt as to the action you 
should take you should consult your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant or other independent financial adviser 
authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 immediately.

If you have sold or otherwise transferred all of your ordinary shares in Temple Bar Investment Trust PLC, please forward this 
document and the accompanying form of proxy as soon as possible to the purchaser or transferee or to the stockbroker, bank 
or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was or is being effected for delivery to the purchaser or transferee.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the ninetieth Annual General Meeting of Temple Bar Investment Trust PLC will be held 
at 11.00am on Wednesday 30 March 2016 at Woolgate Exchange, 25 Basinghall Street, London EC2V 5HA for the  
following purposes:

ORDINARY BUSINESS:

1.

 To approve the Company’s accounts for the year ended 31 December 2015 together with the reports of the
directors and auditor thereon.

2. To approve the report on directors’ remuneration for the year ended 31 December 2015.

3. To declare a final dividend of 15.87p per ordinary share.

4. To re-elect Mr A T Copple as a director.

5. To re-elect Mrs J F de Moller as a director.

6. To re-elect Mr R W Jewson as a director.

7. To re-elect Mr J Reeve as a director.

8. To elect Dr L R Sherratt as a director.

9. To re-elect Mr D G C Webster as a director.

10. To re-appoint the auditor and to authorise the audit committee to determine their remuneration.

SPECIAL BUSINESS:

To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following resolutions:

ORDINARY RESOLUTION:

11.  That the directors be and are hereby generally and unconditionally authorised in accordance with Section 551 of
the Companies Act 2006 to allot shares in the Company or grant rights to subscribe for or to convert any security
into shares in the Company (‘Rights’) up to an aggregate maximum nominal amount of £1,671,819, being approximately
10% of the issued share capital of the Company as at 23 February 2016, provided that:

(i)

(ii)

 the authority granted shall expire at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting of the Company in 2017 but
may be revoked or varied by the Company in general meeting and may be renewed by the Company in general
meeting; and

 the said authority shall allow and enable the directors to make an offer or agreement before the expiry of that
authority which would or might require shares to be allotted or Rights to be granted after such expiry and the
directors may allot shares and grant Rights in pursuance of any such offer or agreement as if that authority had
not expired.

51

GOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONSTRATEGIC REPORTTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015NOTICE OF MEETING CONTINUED

SPECIAL RESOLUTIONS:

12.  That, subject to the passing of resolution 11 set out above, the directors be and they are hereby empowered pursuant
to Section 570-573 of the Companies Act 2006 to allot equity securities (as defined in Section 560 of that Act) for cash,
including, for the avoidance of doubt, the sale of shares held by the Company as treasury shares, in accordance with the
authority conferred on them by this meeting to allot shares, as if Section 561(i) of that Act did not apply to the allotment,
provided that the power conferred by this resolution shall be limited to:

(i)

 the allotment of equity securities in connection with a rights issue, open offer or the pre-emptive offer in favour
of ordinary shareholders where the equity securities respectively attributable to the interests of all ordinary
shareholders are proportionate to the respective numbers of ordinary shares held by them on the record date of such
allotment (but subject to such exclusions or other arrangements as the directors may deem necessary or expedient
in relation to fractional entitlements or legal problems under the law of or the requirements of any recognised
regulatory body or any stock exchange in any territory); and

(ii)

 the allotment (otherwise than pursuant to sub paragraph (i) above) of equity securities up to an aggregate nominal
value not exceeding £1,671,819; and

 shall expire at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting of the Company in 2017 save that the Company may make 
an offer or agreement before this power has expired, which would or might require equity securities to be allotted after 
such expiry and the directors may allot equity securities in pursuance of such offer or agreement as if the authority 
conferred hereby had not expired.

13.  That the Company generally be and is hereby authorised for the purpose of Section 701 of the Companies Act 2006 to

make market purchases (as defined in Section 693 of the Act) of ordinary shares of 25p each in the capital of the Company
(‘ordinary shares’) either for retention as treasury shares for future reissue, resale, transfer or cancellation provided that:

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

(v)

 the maximum number of ordinary shares hereby authorised to be purchased is 14.99% of the issued share capital of
the Company as at the date of the passing of this resolution;

the minimum price which may be paid for such shares is 25p per share;

 the maximum price (exclusive of expenses payable by the Company) which may be paid for such shares shall be 5%
above the average of the market value of the share quotations taken from the London Stock Exchange Daily Official
List for the five business days before the purchase is made;

 the authority hereby conferred shall (unless previously renewed or revoked) expire at the end of the Annual General
Meeting of the Company in 2017, or, if earlier, the date falling fifteen months from the date of this resolution;

 the Company may make a contract to purchase its own shares under the authority hereby conferred prior to the
expiry of such authority which will or may be executed wholly or partly after the expiry of such authority, and may
make a purchase of its own shares in pursuance of any such contract.

By order of the Board of Directors 

M K Slade 
For Investec Asset Management Limited 
Secretary 

23 February 2016

Woolgate Exchange 
25 Basinghall Street 
 London EC2V 5HA

52

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015SHOWN IS A PLAN OF THE 
LOCATION OF INVESTEC 
ASSET MANAGEMENT 
LIMITED, WOOLGATE 
EXCHANGE, 25 BASINGHALL 
STREET, LONDON EC2V 
5HA WHERE THE ANNUAL 
GENERAL MEETING WILL 
BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY 
30 MARCH 2016 AT 11.00AM.

NOTES

1.

 Entitlement to attend and vote
 Members who hold ordinary shares in the Company in uncertificated form must have been entered on the Company’s
register of members by 6.00pm on 24 March 2016 in order to be able to attend and vote at the meeting, or if the meeting
is adjourned, 6.00pm on the day two business days before the time fixed for the adjourned meeting. Such members may
only vote at the meeting in respect of ordinary shares held at the time.

2.   Proxies

 A member entitled to attend and vote at the above meeting is entitled to appoint a proxy to attend the meeting to speak
and vote on a show of hands and, on a poll, to vote instead of him. A proxy need not be a member of the Company. A
member wishing to appoint more than one proxy must appoint each proxy in respect of a specified number of shares within
his holding. For this purpose, a member may photocopy the enclosed Form of Proxy before completion and must indicate
the number of shares in respect of which each proxy is appointed.

 Instruments of proxy should be sent to Equiniti Limited, Aspect House, Spencer Road, Lancing, West Sussex BN99 6DA
so as to arrive no later than 11.00am on 24 March 2016. Completion and return of the form of proxy will not preclude
shareholders from attending and voting at the meeting in person should they wish to do so.

 As an alternative to completing a hard copy Form of Proxy, you can appoint a proxy or proxies electronically by visiting
www.sharevote.co.uk. You will need your Voting ID, Task ID and Shareholder Reference Number (this is the series of
numbers printed at the top right-hand side of the Form of Proxy). Alternatively, if you have already registered with Equiniti
Limited’s online portfolio service, Shareview, you can submit your Form of Proxy at www.shareview.co.uk. You may not use
any electronic address provided in this notice of meeting to communicate with the Company for any purposes other than
those expressly stated. Full instructions are given on both websites. To be valid, your proxy appointment(s) and instructions
should reach Equiniti Limited no later than 11am on 24 March 2016.

 CREST members who wish to appoint a proxy or proxies by utilising the CREST electronic proxy appointment service may
do so for the meeting and any adjournment(s) thereof by using the procedures described in the CREST Manual. CREST
personal members or other CREST sponsored members and those CREST members who have appointed a voting service
provider(s) should refer to their CREST sponsor or voting service provider(s) who will be able to take the appropriate
action on their behalf. In order for a proxy appointment made using the CREST service to be valid, the appropriate CREST
message (a “CREST Proxy Instruction”) must be properly authenticated in accordance with Euroclear’s specifications
and must contain the information required for such instructions, as described in the CREST Manual (available via
www.euroclear.com). The CREST message must be transmitted so as to be received by the issuer’s agent (ID RA19) by
not later than 48 hours (excluding non-working days) before the time appointed for the holding of the meeting or the
adjourned meeting. For this purpose, the time of receipt will be taken to be the time (as determined by the timestamp
applied to the CREST message by the CREST Applications Host) from which the issuer’s agent is able to retrieve the CREST
message by enquiry to CREST in the manner prescribed by CREST.

53

GOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONSTRATEGIC REPORTTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015NOTICE OF MEETING CONTINUED

2.   Proxies continued

 After this time any change of instructions to proxies appointed through CREST should be communicated to the appointee
through other means. CREST members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors or voting service provider(s), should
note that Euroclear does not make available special procedures in CREST for any particular messages. Normal system
timings and limitations will therefore apply in relation to the input of CREST Proxy Instructions. It is the responsibility of the
CREST member concerned to take (or, if the CREST member(s) is/are a CREST personal member or sponsored member or
has appointed a voting service provider(s), to procure that the CREST sponsor or voting service provider takes) such action
as shall be necessary to ensure that a CREST message is transmitted by means of the CREST system by any particular
time. In this connection, CREST members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors or voting service provider(s) is/are
referred, in particular, to those sections of the CREST Manual concerning practical limitations of the CREST system and
timings. The Company may treat as invalid a CREST Proxy instruction in the circumstances set out in Regulation 35(5)(a) of
the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001.

3.   Corporate representatives 

 A member of the Company which is a corporation may authorise a person or persons to act as its representative(s) at the
AGM. In accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006, each such representative may exercise (on behalf
of the corporation) the same powers as the corporation could exercise if it were an individual member of the Company,
provided that they do not do so in relation to the same shares. It is no longer necessary to nominate a designated
corporate representative.

4.   Nominated persons

 In accordance with Section 325 of the Companies Act 2006, the right to appoint proxies does not apply to persons
nominated to receive information rights under Section 146 of the Act. Persons nominated to receive information rights
under Section 146 of the Act who have been sent a copy of this notice of meeting are hereby informed, in accordance with
Section 149 (2) of the Act, that they may have a right under an agreement with the registered member by whom they were
nominated to be appointed, or to have someone else appointed, as a proxy for this meeting. If they have no such right,
or do not wish to exercise it, they may have a right under such an agreement to give instructions to the member as to the
exercise of voting rights. Nominated persons should contact the registered member by whom they were nominated in
respect of these arrangements.

 Members’ requests under Section 527 of the 2006 Act
 Under Section 527 of the Companies Act 2006 members meeting the threshold requirements set out in that section have
the right to require the Company to publish on a website a statement setting out any matter relating to (i) the audit of the
Company’s accounts (including the auditor’s report and the conduct of the audit) that are to be laid before the Annual
General Meeting for the financial year beginning 1 January 2015; or (ii) any circumstance connected with an auditor of the
Company appointed for the financial year 1 January 2015 ceasing to hold office since the previous meeting at which annual
accounts and reports were laid. The Company may not require the shareholders requesting any such website publication
to pay its expenses in complying with Sections 527 or 528 (requirements as to website availability) of the Companies Act
2006. Where the Company is required to place a statement on a website under Section 527 of the Companies Act 2006, it
must forward the statement to the Company’s auditor not later than the time when it makes the statement available on the
website. The business which may be dealt with at the Annual General Meeting for the relevant financial year includes any
statement that the Company has been required under Section 527 of the Companies Act 2006 to publish on a website.

 Members’ rights to ask questions
 Any member attending the meeting has the right to ask questions. The Company must cause to be answered any such
question relating to the business being dealt with at the meeting but no such answer need be given if (a) to do so would
interfere unduly with the preparation for the meeting or involve the disclosure of confidential information, (b) the answer
has already been given on a website in the form of an answer to a question, or (c) it is undesirable in the interests of the
Company or the good order of the meeting that the question be answered.

 Inspection of documents
None of the directors has a service contract with the Company.

 Total number of shares and voting rights
 As at 23 February 2016, the latest practicable date prior to publication of this document, the Company had 66,872,765
ordinary shares in issue with a total of 66,872,765 voting rights.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.   Website

 In accordance with Section 311A of the Companies Act 2006, the contents of this notice of meeting, details of the total
number of shares in respect of which members are entitled to exercise voting rights at the AGM and, if applicable, any
members’ statements, members’ resolutions or members’ matters of business received by the Company after the date of
this notice will be available on the Company’s website: www.templebarinvestments.co.uk.

54

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015USEFUL INFORMATION FOR SHAREHOLDERS

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

The Annual General Meeting will be held at Woolgate Exchange, 25 Basinghall Street, London EC2V 5HA (see map on 
page 53), on 30 March 2016 at 11.00am.

FINANCIAL CALENDAR

The financial calendar for 2016 is set out below:

Ordinary shares 
Final dividend, 2015  – payable 

– ex-dividend
– record date

First interim dividend, 2016 
Second interim dividend, 2016 
Third interim dividend, 2016 
Final dividend, 2016   

9.875% Debenture Stock 2017 
Interest payments 

5.5% Debenture Stock 2021 
Interest payments 

PAYMENT OF DIVIDENDS

31 March 2016 
10 March 2016 
11 March 2016 
30 June 2016 
30 September 2016 
30 December 2016 
End of March 2017

30 June and 31 December

8 March and 8 September

Cash dividends will be sent by cheque to the first-named shareholder on the Register at his or her registered address together 
with a tax voucher. At shareholders’ request, dividends may instead be paid direct into the shareholder’s bank account through 
the Bankers’ Automated Clearing System (‘BACS’). This may be arranged by contacting the Company’s Registrar  
on 0371 384 2432.

PRICE AND PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

The Company’s ordinary shares and debenture stocks are traded on the London Stock Exchange. The market price of the 
ordinary shares is shown daily in the Financial Times, other leading newspapers and on the Company’s website.

SHARE REGISTER ENQUIRIES

The Company’s Registrar, Equiniti, maintains the share register. In the event of queries regarding your holding, please contact 
the Registrar on 0371 384 2432 (overseas +44 (0)121 415 7047). Lines are open from 8.30am to 5.30pm Monday to Friday. 
Changes of name or address must be notified in writing to the Registrar.

SEDOL CODES FOR ORDINARY SHARES AND DEBENTURE STOCKS 

Ordinary shares  
9.875% Debenture Stock 2017 
5.5% Debenture Stock 2021  

0882532 
0882640 
0530529

The ISIN Number for the ordinary shares is GB0008825324

TAX INFORMATION EXCHANGE

Local laws may require Temple Bar to disclose investor, holding and income data to UK and other tax authorities. This will only 
happen where required by law.

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST SAVINGS SCHEME

Details of the Temple Bar Savings Scheme are set out on page 59 of this report. This enables individuals to buy shares in the 
Company in a straightforward and accessible way.

ASSOCIATION OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES

The Company is a member of the Association of Investment Companies, which produces monthly publications of detailed 
information on the majority of investment trusts. The Association of Investment Companies can be contacted by telephone 
on 020 7282 5555.

TEMPLE BAR WEBSITE

The Company’s own website can be found at www.templebarinvestments.co.uk and includes useful background information 
on the Company together with helpful downloads of published documentation such as previous Annual Reports and Savings 
Scheme application forms.

55

GOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONSTRATEGIC REPORTTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015 
 
 
MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM)
Investec Fund Managers Limited 
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority 
Portfolio Manager, Alastair Mundy 
Woolgate Exchange 
25 Basinghall Street 
London EC2V 5HA 
Telephone No. 020 7597 2000

Independent auditor 
Ernst & Young LLP 
1 More London Place  
London SE1 2AF

Depositary, bankers and custodian 
HSBC Bank plc 
Poultry 
London EC2P 2BX

Stockbrokers
JPMorgan Cazenove 
25 Bank Street  
Canary Wharf  
London E14 5JP

Solicitors
Eversheds LLP  
1 Wood Street 
London EC2V 7WS

Registered office 
Woolgate Exchange 
25 Basinghall Street  
London EC2V 5HA

Company Secretary
Investec Asset Management Limited, 
represented by Martin Slade

Registered number
Registered in England No. 214601

Registrar and Savings Scheme administrator
Equiniti Limited 
Aspect House 
Spencer Road 
Lancing 
West Sussex BN99 6DA

Telephone No: 
+44 121 415 7047 (overseas shareholder helpline)
0371 384 2432 (shareholder helpline)*
0906 559 6025 (broker helpline)

*Lines open 8.30 a.m. to 5.30 p.m., Monday to Friday.

56

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ABSOLUTE PERFORMANCE

The return that an asset achieves over a period of time, relative to the investment itself.

ANNUAL MANAGEMENT FEE

The annual consideration paid to an asset management company for managing clients’ investments.

ATTRIBUTION ANALYSIS

A performance-evaluation tool used to analyse the abilities of portfolio or fund managers. Attribution analysis  
uncovers the impact of the manager's investment decisions with regard to overall investment policy, asset allocation, 
security selection and activity.

BENCHMARK

A comparative performance index.

BORROWING

See gearing.

BOTTOM-UP STOCK SELECTION

An investment approach that concentrates on the analysis of individual companies and considers the company’s history, 
management and potential as more important than macroeconomic trends.

CASH ALTERNATIVES/EQUIVALENT

Also known as cash equivalents. A class of investments considered relatively low-risk because of their high liquidity, 
meaning they can be quickly converted into cash. 

CONTRARIAN APPROACH

An investment style that goes against prevailing market trends. In very simple terms the approach is defined by buying 
assets that are performing poorly and then selling when they perform well.

DEBENTURE STOCKS

A type of stock entitling the bearer to a certain fixed dividend at set periods of time.

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

An instrument whose value depends on the performance of an underlying security or rate which requires no initial 
exchange of principal. Options, futures and swaps are all examples of derivatives.

DIVERSIFICATION

Holding a range of assets to reduce risk.

DIVIDEND 

The portion of company net profits paid out to shareholders.

FIXED INTEREST 

Fixed interest securities, also known as bonds, are loans usually taken out by a government or company which normally 
pay a fixed rate of interest over a given time period, at the end of which the loan is repaid.

FTSE ALL-SHARE INDEX

A comparative index that tracks the market price of the UK's leading companies listed on the London Stock Exchange.  
Covering around 900 companies, including investment trusts, the name FTSE is taken from the Financial Times (FT) and 
the London Stock Exchange (SE), who are its joint owners.

FTSE 350 INDEX

A comparative index that tracks the market price of the UK's 350 largest companies, by market value, listed on the 
London Stock Exchange. 

GEARING

In accounting terms, gearing is the amount of a company’s total borrowings divided by its share capital. High gearing means 
a proportionately large amount of debt, which may be considered more risky for equity holders. However, gearing also entails 
tax advantages. In investment analysis, a highly geared company is one where small changes in sales produce big swings in 
profits. Also known as leverage.

57

GOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONSTRATEGIC REPORTTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015GLOSSARY OF TERMS CONTINUED

GILTS

A bond that is issued by the British government which is generally considered low risk. 

HEDGING 

A technique seeking to offset or minimise the exposure to a specific risk by entering an opposing position. 

LIQUIDITY

The ease with which an asset can be sold at a reasonable price for cash.

MARKET CAPITALISATION

The total value of a company’s equity, calculated by the number of shares multiplied by their market price.

NET ASSET VALUE

In a company context, the net asset value describes total assets minus total liabilities.

ONGOING CHARGE

This figure includes the annual management fee and administrative costs but excludes any performance fee or portfolio 
transaction costs. Ongoing charges may vary from year to year.

PEER COMPANIES

Companies that operate in the same industry sector and are of similar size.

RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

The return that an asset achieves over a period of time, compared to a benchmark.

SHARE BUYBACK 

When a company buys some of its own shares in the market, which leads to a rise in the share price. It changes the company’s 
debt-to-equity ratio and is a tax-efficient alternative to paying out dividends.

STOCK LENDING

Also known as securities lending. The act of loaning a stock, derivative, or other security to an investor or firm. It requires the 
borrower to put up collateral, whether cash, security or a letter of credit. When a security is loaned, the title and the ownership 
is also transferred to the borrower.

TOTAL RETURN

Captures both the capital appreciation/depreciation of an investment as well as the income generated over a holding period.

VALUATION 

Determination of the value of a company's stock based on earnings and the market value of assets.

YIELD 

A measure of the income return earned on an investment. In the case of a share the yield expresses the annual dividend 
payment as the percentage of the market price of the share. In the case of a bond the running yield (or flat or current yield) is 
the annual interest payable as a percentage of the current market price. The redemption yield (or yield to maturity) allows for 
any gain or loss of capital which will be realised at the maturity date.

58

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST SAVINGS SCHEME

Temple Bar offers an inexpensive way of investing in the Company.

The Temple Bar Investment Trust Savings Scheme offers:

• monthly savings from as little as £50 a month

•

•

a daily dealing facility for lump sum investments or sales

income reinvestment

If you would like to receive information about the Savings Scheme, call the Investor Services Department on 020 7597 1800 
or visit our website www.templebarinvestments.co.uk. Alternatively please write to:
Investor Services Department 
Investec Asset Management Limited 
Woolgate Exchange 
25 Basinghall Street 
London EC2V 5HA

Past performance will not necessarily be repeated. You are not certain to make a profit; you may lose money and any income 
is not fixed – it can go up or down. Tax benefits detailed are those currently applicable and will vary from one investor to 
another and may change in the future. The government’s 0.5% stamp duty is payable on all share purchases. Shares will  
be purchased at Temple Bar’s buying price and will be sold at Temple Bar’s selling price. Phone calls may be recorded to  
confirm your instructions.

The above information has been issued by Investec Fund Managers Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial 
Conduct Authority, the AIFM of Temple Bar Investment Trust PLC.

A member of the Association of Investment Companies

59

GOVERNANCE REPORTFINANCIAL REPORTSHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONSTRATEGIC REPORTTEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLCAnnual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015Temple Bar Investment Trust’s investment objective is to 
provide growth in income and capital to achieve a long term 
total return greater than the benchmark FTSE All-Share 
Index, through investment primarily in UK securities. The 
Company’s policy is to invest in a broad spread of securities 
with typically the majority of the portfolio selected from the 
constituents of the FTSE 350 Index.

CONTENTS

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE REPORT

FINANCIAL REPORT

1   Summary of results

18   Directors

36   Statement of 

SHAREHOLDER 
INFORMATION

2  Chairman’s statement

19   Report of Directors

3   Ten year record

22   Report on directors’ 

4   Manager’s review

10   Attribution analysis

11   Overview of strategy

16   Portfolio of investments

remuneration

24   Corporate governance

27   Report of the audit 

committee

29   Statement of directors’ 

responsibilities

30   Independent auditor’s 

report

Comprehensive Income

51   Notice of meeting

37   Statement of Changes 

in Equity

38   Statement of Financial 

Position

39   Statement of  
Cash Flows

40   Notes to the Financial 

Statements

55   Useful information  
for shareholders

56   Management and 
administration

57  Glossary of terms

59   Temple Bar Investment 
Trust Savings Scheme

TEMPLE BAR INVESTMENT TRUST PLC
Annual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015

T
e
m
p
e
B
a
r

l

I

n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
T
r
u
s
t
P
L
C

A
n
n
u
a

l

R
e
p
o
r
t

i

&
F
n
a
n
c

i

a

l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
2
0
1
5

ANNUAL REPORT & FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015