Texas Instruments
Annual Report 2011

Plain-text annual report

2011 Annual Report Notice of 2 012 Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement 226966_TI_CVR_R3.indd 1 2/15/12 2:30 PM Richard K. Templeton Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer To our shareholders Five years ago, we began a journey to fundamentally remake Texas Instruments into a company focused on two of the industry’s most attractive semiconductor markets – Analog and Embedded Processing. Despite its ups and downs, I believe 2011 became the most important year yet in that journey given the strategic progress made in our businesses. The year began with high expectations for sustained strength in world economies; but before the first quarter was over, one of the worst natural disasters of our lifetime – the earthquake and tsunami in Japan – began to impact the production of electronics, and by summer, political and economic uncertainty was unraveling the recovery. Even so, it was a year in which TI outpaced the market in Analog and Embedded Processing and again gained share. Foremost among the things that made 2011 important was our acquisition of National Semiconductor. This strategically significant purchase gave us immediate access to a high-quality portfolio of more than 12,000 analog products and a large pool of highly talented analog engineers. Together, we offer customers a powerful and unparalleled suite of solutions. In Embedded Processing, we continued to heavy up our investments in microcontrollers, where our ultra-low power capabilities enable an expanded range of applications. As a result, we’ve increased our portfolio fourfold in the last three years, and today offer products across the breadth of the microcontroller spectrum. In our third major business, Wireless, two significant things occurred. First, we continued our planned exit from basebands; as we enter 2012, we expect revenue from this product line to become only a couple of percent of our revenue compared with almost 25 percent four years ago. More strategically, we strengthened our position in applications processors and connectivity products – both of which offer great growth potential. As cloud computing increasingly takes hold, the opportunity for these products in many smart, connected devices will increase. Across all our businesses, there is a meaningful story developing in the diversity of our customer base. We now have more than 90,000 customers and, excluding our wireless baseband products, no single customer comprises more than 5 percent of our revenue. This breadth of customers alongside our breadth of portfolio sets TI apart from our competitors. The transition at TI is evident in our numbers. Today, our core businesses constitute more than 70 percent of our revenue, and that number should continue to grow as almost 90 percent of our R&D investments are targeted there. Nowhere is the progress more obvious than in Analog, which now comprises half of our company’s total revenue, up from a third in 2006. During 2011, we again returned cash to stockholders through stock repurchases of $2 billion and an increase of 31 percent in the dividend rate. Even so, the balance sheet remained robust with year-end cash and short-term investments of almost $3 billion. As we look to future growth, we continue to make strong investments in China, the geographic region we believe most critical to success. We have a large, determined sales and applications engineering team there with offices in 16 cities, four times more than we had six years ago. We’ve taken a similar approach in India, Eastern Europe and Russia – all emerging markets with growing middle-class populations that will shape future economies. By the end of 2011, the challenges from earlier in the year were abating. The industry was recovering from Japan’s natural disasters, semiconductor demand was becoming better aligned with customer demand, and our revenue was starting to improve. We know that great technology companies deliver growth – lots of it. The chips we make are increasingly pervasive in our daily lives, so we believe the opportunity to achieve this goal is within reach. Our job now is to transform great potential into great results and to make consistent outperformance the hallmark of our company. And that is our sole priority for 2012. L A U N N A T R O P E R Financial statements table of contents Consolidated statements of income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Consolidated statements of comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Consolidated balance sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Consolidated statements of cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Notes to financial statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Description of business and significant accounting policies and practices Acquisitions and divestitures other than National National Semiconductor acquisition Losses associated with the earthquake in Japan Goodwill and acquisition-related intangibles Postretirement benefit plans Restructuring charges Debt and lines of credit Stock-based compensation Commitments and contingencies Profit sharing plans Income taxes Stockholders’ equity Supplemental financial information Financial instruments and risk concentration Segment and geographic area data Valuation of debt and equity investments and certain liabilities Report of independent registered public accounting firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Report by management on internal control over financial reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Report of independent registered public accounting firm on internal control over financial reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Summary of selected financial data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Overview Critical accounting policies Results of operations Changes in accounting standards Prior results of operations Off-balance sheet arrangements Financial condition Commitments and contingencies Liquidity and capital resources Long-term contractual obligations Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk Quarterly financial data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Common stock prices and dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Comparison of total shareholder return . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Safe Harbor statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 Notice of 2012 annual meeting of stockholders and proxy statement Notice of annual meeting of stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 Proxy statement table of contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 1 R E P O R T A N N U A L Consolidated statements of income [Millions of dollars, except share and per-share amounts] For Years Ended December 31, 2011 2010 2009 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of revenue (COR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Research and development (R&D) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition charges/divestiture (gain) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income (expense) net (OI&E) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest and debt expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,735 6,963 6,772 1,715 1,638 112 315 2,992 5 42 2,955 719 $ 2,236 $13,966 6,474 7,492 1,570 1,519 33 (144) 4,514 37 — 4,551 1,323 $ 3,228 $10,427 5,428 4,999 1,476 1,320 212 — 1,991 26 — 2,017 547 $ 1,470 Earnings per common share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 1.91 1.88 $ 2 .66 $ 2 .62 $ 1 .16 $ 1 .15 Average shares outstanding (millions): Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,151 1,171 1,199 1,213 1,260 1,269 Cash dividends declared per share of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.56 $ 0 .49 $ 0 .45 See accompanying notes . 2 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Consolidated statements of comprehensive income [Millions of dollars] For Years Ended December 31, 2011 2010 2009 L A U N N A T R O P E R Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss): Available-for-sale investments: $ 2,236 $ 3,228 $ 1,470 Unrealized gains (losses), net of tax benefit (expense) of $1, ($3) and ($9) . . . . . . . . . . . Reclassification of recognized transactions, net of tax benefit (expense) of ($7), $0 and ($3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) 12 7 — Net actuarial gains (losses) of defined benefit plans: Adjustment, net of tax benefit (expense) of $65, $61 and ($38) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reclassification of recognized transactions, net of tax benefit (expense) of ($28), ($36) and ($27) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prior service cost of defined benefit plans: Adjustment, net of tax benefit (expense) of $5, ($1) and $1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reclassification of recognized transactions, net of tax benefit (expense) (124) (154) 48 (9) 65 2 17 6 91 62 (1) of ($1), $0 and $3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in fair value of derivative instrument, net of tax benefit (expense) of $1 . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 (2) (75) $ 2,161 — — (80) $ 3,148 (6) — 169 $ 1,639 See accompanying notes . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 3 R E P O R T A N N U A L Consolidated balance sheets [Millions of dollars, except share amounts] Assets Current assets: December 31, 2011 2010 Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable, net of allowances of ($19) and ($18) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Raw materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Work in process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment at cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition-related intangibles, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capitalized software licenses, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Overfunded retirement plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liabilities and stockholders’ equity Current liabilities: Commercial paper borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Underfunded retirement plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred credits and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stockholders’ equity: Preferred stock, $25 par value . Authorized – 10,000,000 shares . $ 992 1,943 1,545 115 1,004 669 1,788 1,174 386 7,828 7,133 (2,705) 4,428 265 4,452 2,900 321 206 40 57 $ 20,497 $ 999 382 625 597 101 795 3,499 4,211 701 607 527 9,545 $ 1,319 1,753 1,518 122 919 479 1,520 770 180 7,060 6,907 (3,227) 3,680 453 924 76 927 205 31 45 $ 13,401 $ — — 621 629 109 622 1,981 — 519 86 378 2,964 Participating cumulative preferred . None issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — Common stock, $1 par value . Authorized – 2,400,000,000 shares . Shares issued: 2011 – 1,740,630,391; 2010 – 1,740,166,101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less treasury common stock at cost . 1,741 1,194 26,278 Shares: 2011 – 601,131,631; 2010 – 572,722,397 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (17,485) (776) 10,952 $ 20,497 1,740 1,114 24,695 (16,411) (701) 10,437 $ 13,401 See accompanying notes . 4 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Consolidated statements of cash flows [Millions of dollars] Cash flows from operating activities: For Years Ended December 31, 2011 2010 2009 L A U N N A T R O P E R Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to net income: $ 2,236 $ 3,228 $ 1,470 Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on sales of assets and divestiture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) from changes in: Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable and accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash flows from investing activities: Additions to property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from insurance recovery, asset sales and divestiture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchases of short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sales, redemptions and maturities of short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchases of long-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Redemptions and sales of long-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Business acquisitions: Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt and commercial paper borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance costs for long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repayment of commercial paper borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sales and other common stock transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Excess tax benefit from share-based payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock repurchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 269 111 (5) (119) 112 (17) (29) 2 (77) (85) (46) 3,256 (816) 16 (3,653) 3,555 (6) 157 (865) (225) (4,335) (5,425) (6,172) 4,697 (12) (200) (644) 690 31 (1,973) 2,589 865 190 48 (144) (188) (231) (304) (8) 57 246 (19) 80 3,820 (1,199) 148 (2,510) 2,564 (8) 147 (200) (14) 15 (199) (1,057) — — — (592) 407 13 (2,454) (2,626) 877 186 48 — 146 (364) 177 115 5 (38) 87 (66) 2,643 (753) — (2,273) 2,030 (9) 64 (3) (4) (148) (155) (1,096) — — — (567) 109 1 (954) (1,411) Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (327) 1,319 $ 136 137 1,046 1,182 992 $ 1,319 $ 1,182 See accompanying notes . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 5 R E P O R T A N N U A L Consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity [Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts] Common Stock Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings Treasury Common Stock Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Balance, December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,740 $ 1,022 $ 21,168 $(13,814) $ (790) 2009 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends declared and paid ($ .45 per share) . . . . . . . . . Common stock issued on exercise of stock options . . . . . . . Stock repurchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax impact from exercise of options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance, December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2010 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends declared and paid ($ .49 per share) . . . . . . . . . Common stock issued on exercise of stock options . . . . . . . Stock repurchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax impact from exercise of options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance, December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — — — — — 1,740 — — — — — — — — 1,740 — — (120) — 186 (2) — — 1,086 — — (182) — 190 21 — (1) 1,114 1,470 (567) — — — — — (5) 22,066 3,228 (592) — — — — — (7) 24,695 — — 226 (961) — — — — (14,549) — — 588 (2,450) — — — — (16,411) 2011 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends declared and paid ($.56 per share) . . . . . . . . Common stock issued on exercise of stock options . . . . Stock repurchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax impact from exercise of options . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance, December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 1 — — — — — $ 1,741 — — (252) — 269 45 — 18 $ 1,194 2,236 (644) — — — — — (9) $ 26,278 — — 898 (1,973) — — — 1 $(17,485) See accompanying notes . — — — — — — 169 — (621) — — — — — — (80) — (701) — — — — — — (75) — $ (776) 6 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S L A U N N A T R O P E R Notes to financial statements 1. Description of business and significant accounting policies and practices Business At Texas Instruments (TI), we design and make semiconductors that we sell to electronics designers and manufacturers all over the world . We have three reportable segments, which are established along major categories of products as follows: • Analog – consists of High Volume Analog & Logic (HVAL), Power Management (Power) and High Performance Analog (HPA) . Following the acquisition of National Semiconductor Corporation (National), our Analog segment also includes National’s ongoing operations under the name of Silicon Valley Analog (SVA); • Embedded Processing – consists of digital signal processors (DSPs) and microcontrollers used in catalog, communications infrastructure and automotive applications; and • Wireless – consists of OMAP™ applications processors, connectivity products and basebands for wireless applications, including handsets and tablet computers . We report the results of our remaining business activities in Other . See Note 17 for additional information on our business segments . Basis of presentation The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U .S . GAAP) . The basis of these financial statements is comparable for all periods presented herein . The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all subsidiaries . All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation . All dollar amounts in the financial statements and tables in these notes, except per-share amounts, are stated in millions of U .S . dollars unless otherwise indicated . We have reclassified certain amounts in the prior periods’ financial statements to conform to the 2011 presentation . The preparation of financial statements requires the use of estimates from which final results may vary . On September 23, 2011, we completed the acquisition of National . The consolidated financial statements include the balances and results of operations of National from the date of acquisition . See Note 2 for more detailed information . Revenue recognition We recognize revenue from direct sales of our products to our customers, including shipping fees, when title passes to the customer, which usually occurs upon shipment or delivery, depending upon the terms of the sales order; when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; when sales amounts are fixed or determinable; and when collectability is reasonably assured . Revenue from sales of our products that are subject to inventory consignment agreements is recognized when the customer pulls product from consignment inventory that we store at designated locations . Estimates of product returns for quality reasons and of price allowances (based on historical experience, product shipment analysis and customer contractual arrangements) are recorded when revenue is recognized . Allowances include volume-based incentives and special pricing arrangements . In addition, we record allowances for accounts receivable that we estimate may not be collected . We recognize revenue from direct sales of our products to our distributors, net of allowances, consistent with the principles discussed above . Title transfers to the distributors at delivery or when the products are pulled from consignment inventory, and payment is due on our standard commercial terms; payment terms are not contingent upon resale of the products . We also grant discounts to some distributors for prompt payments . We calculate credit allowances based on historical data, current economic conditions and contractual terms . For instance, we sell to distributors at standard published prices, but we may grant them price adjustment credits in response to individual competitive opportunities they may have . To estimate allowances, we use statistical percentages of revenue, determined quarterly, based upon recent historical adjustment trends . We also provide distributors an allowance to scrap certain slow-moving or obsolete products in their inventory, estimated as a negotiated fixed percentage of each distributor’s purchases from us . In addition, if we publish a new price for a product that is lower than that paid by distributors for the same product still remaining in each distributor’s on-hand inventory, we may credit them for the difference between those prices . The allowance for this type of credit is based on the identified product price difference applied to our estimate of each distributor’s on-hand inventory of that product . We believe we can reasonably and reliably estimate allowances for credits to distributors in a timely manner . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 7 We determine the amount and timing of royalty revenue based on our contractual agreements with intellectual property licensees . R E P O R T A N N U A L We recognize royalty revenue when earned under the terms of the agreements and when we consider realization of payment to be probable . Where royalties are based on a percentage of licensee sales of royalty-bearing products, we recognize royalty revenue by applying this percentage to our estimate of applicable licensee sales . We base this estimate on historical experience and an analysis of each licensee’s sales results . Where royalties are based on fixed payment amounts, we recognize royalty revenue ratably over the term of the royalty agreement . Where warranted, revenue from licensees may be recognized on a cash basis . We include shipping and handling costs in COR . Advertising costs We expense advertising and other promotional costs as incurred . This expense was $43 million in 2011, $44 million in 2010 and $42 million in 2009 . Income taxes We account for income taxes using an asset and liability approach . We record the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and the deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns . We record a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . Other assessed taxes Some transactions require us to collect taxes such as sales, value-added and excise taxes from our customers . These transactions are presented in our statements of income on a net (excluded from revenue) basis . Earnings per share (EPS) Unvested awards of share-based payments with rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents, such as our restricted stock units (RSUs), are considered to be participating securities and the two-class method is used for purposes of calculating EPS . Under the two-class method, a portion of net income is allocated to these participating securities and, therefore, is excluded from the calculation of EPS allocated to common stock, as shown in the table below . Computation and reconciliation of earnings per common share are as follows (shares in millions): Net Income 2011 Shares EPS Net Income 2010 Shares EPS Net Income 2009 Shares EPS Basic EPS: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,236 Less income allocated to RSUs . . . . . . . . . . . (35) Income allocated to common stock for basic $ 3,228 (44) $ 1,470 (14) EPS calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,201 1,151 $1.91 $ 3,184 1,199 $2 .66 $ 1,456 1,260 $1 .16 Adjustment for dilutive shares: Stock-based compensation plans . . . . . . . . 20 14 9 Diluted EPS: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,236 Less income allocated to RSUs . . . . . . . . . . . (34) Income allocated to common stock for diluted $ 3,228 (44) $ 1,470 (14) EPS calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,202 1,171 $1.88 $ 3,184 1,213 $2 .62 $ 1,456 1,269 $1 .15 Options to purchase 41 million, 88 million and 135 million shares of common stock that were outstanding during 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because their exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive . 8 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Investments We present investments on our balance sheets as cash equivalents, short-term investments or long-term investments . Specific details are as follows: Cash equivalents and short-term investments: We consider investments in debt securities with maturities of three months or less from the date of our investment to be cash equivalents . We consider investments in debt securities with maturities beyond three months from the date of our investment as being available for use in current operations and include these investments in short-term investments . The primary objectives of our cash equivalent and short-term investment activities are to preserve capital and maintain liquidity while generating appropriate returns . Long-term investments: Long-term investments consist of mutual funds, auction-rate securities, venture capital funds and non-marketable equity securities . Classification of investments: Depending on our reasons for holding the investment and our ownership percentage, we classify investments in securities as available for sale, trading, equity-method or cost-method investments, which are more fully described in Note 9 . We determine cost or amortized cost, as appropriate, on a specific identification basis . L A U N N A T R O P E R Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value . Cost is generally computed on a currently adjusted standard cost basis, which approximates cost on a first-in first-out basis . Standard cost is based on the normal utilization of installed factory capacity . Cost associated with underutilization of capacity is expensed as incurred . Inventory held at consignment locations is included in our finished goods inventory . Consigned inventory was $129 million and $130 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively . We review inventory quarterly for salability and obsolescence . A specific allowance is provided for inventory considered unlikely to be sold . Remaining inventory includes a salability and obsolescence allowance based on an analysis of historical disposal activity . We write off inventory in the period in which disposal occurs . Property, plant and equipment; acquisition-related intangibles and other capitalized costs Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method . Our cost basis includes certain assets acquired in business combinations that were initially recorded at fair value as of the date of acquisition . Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements . We amortize acquisition-related intangibles on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic life of the assets . Capitalized software licenses generally are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the license . Fully depreciated or amortized assets are written off against accumulated depreciation or amortization . Impairments of long-lived assets We regularly review whether facts or circumstances exist that indicate the carrying values of property, plant and equipment or other long-lived assets, including intangible assets, are impaired . We assess the recoverability of assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with those assets to their respective carrying amounts . Any impairment charge is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets . Fair value is determined by available market valuations, if applicable, or by discounted cash flows . Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles Goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if certain impairment indicators arise . We complete our annual goodwill impairment tests as of October 1 for our reporting units . The test compares the fair value for each reporting unit to its associated carrying value including goodwill . We have had no impairment of goodwill for 2011 or 2010 . Foreign currency The functional currency for our non-U .S . subsidiaries is the U .S . dollar . Accounts recorded in currencies other than the U .S . dollar are remeasured into the functional currency . Current assets (except inventories), deferred income taxes, other assets, current liabilities and long-term liabilities are remeasured at exchange rates in effect at the end of each reporting period . Property, plant and equipment with associated depreciation and inventories are remeasured at historic exchange rates . Revenue and expense accounts other than depreciation for each month are remeasured at the appropriate daily rate of exchange . Currency exchange gains and losses from remeasurement are credited or charged to OI&E . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 9 R E P O R T A N N U A L Derivatives and hedging In connection with the issuance of variable-rate long-term debt in May 2011, as more fully described in Note 13, we entered into an interest rate swap designated as a hedge of the variability of cash flows related to interest payments . Gains and losses from changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap are credited or charged to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes (AOCI) . We also use derivative financial instruments to manage exposure to foreign exchange risk . These instruments are primarily forward foreign currency exchange contracts that are used as economic hedges to reduce the earnings impact exchange rate fluctuations may have on our non-U .S . dollar net balance sheet exposures or for specified non-U .S . dollar forecasted transactions . Gains and losses from changes in the fair value of these forward foreign currency exchange contracts are credited or charged to OI&E . We do not apply hedge accounting to our foreign currency derivative instruments . We do not use derivatives for speculative or trading purposes . Changes in accounting standards In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No . 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This standard results in a common requirement between the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair-value measurements . While this new standard will not affect how we measure or account for assets and liabilities at fair value, disclosures will be required for interim and annual periods beginning January 1, 2012 . There will be no impact to our financial condition or results of operation from the adoption of this new standard . In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No . 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment . This standard is intended to simplify how we will test goodwill for impairment . Prior to the issuance of this standard, we were required to use a two-step quantitative test to assess impairment of goodwill . Under this new standard, we will have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether that two-step quantitative test should be performed . This standard is effective for goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted . We will adopt this standard effective January 1, 2012 . 2. National Semiconductor acquisition On September 23, 2011, we completed the acquisition of National by acquiring all issued and outstanding common shares in exchange for cash . National designed, developed, manufactured and marketed a wide range of semiconductor products, focused on providing high-performance energy-efficient analog and mixed-signal solutions . The purpose of the acquisition was to grow revenue by combining National’s products with TI’s larger sales force and customer base . We accounted for this transaction under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 805 – Business Combinations, and National’s operating results are included in the Analog segment from the acquisition date as SVA . The acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred is as follows: Cash payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fair value of vested share-based awards assumed by TI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total consideration transferred to National shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,535 22 $ 6,557 We prepared an initial determination of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date using preliminary information . Adjustments were made during the fourth quarter of 2011 to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as a result of refining our estimates . These were retrospectively applied to the September 23, 2011, acquisition date balance sheet . These adjustments are primarily related to tax matters and netted to an increase of goodwill of $1 million . None of the adjustments had a material impact on TI’s previously reported results of operations . 1 0 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S As of December 31, 2011, the allocation of the consideration transferred to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from National has been finalized . The determination of fair value reflects the assistance of third-party valuation specialists, as well as our own estimates and assumptions . The final allocation of fair value by major class of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date is as follows: L A U N N A T R O P E R At September 23, 2011 Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,145 Current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451 Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225 Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 Acquired intangible assets (see details below) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,956 Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,528 Assumed current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (191) Assumed long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,105) Deferred taxes and other assumed non-current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,455) Total consideration transferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,557 Identifiable intangible assets acquired and their estimated useful lives as of the acquisition date are as follows: Developed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Identified intangible assets subject to amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . In-process R&D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total identified intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asset Amount $ 2,025 810 16 2,851 105 $ 2,956 Weighted Average Useful Life (Years) 10 8 3 (a ) (a) In-process R&D is not amortized until the associated project has been completed . Alternatively, if the associated project is determined not to be viable, it will be expensed . The remaining consideration, after adjusting for identified intangible assets and the net assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, was $3 .528 billion and was applied to goodwill . Goodwill is attributed to National’s product portfolio and workforce expertise . None of the goodwill related to the National acquisition is deductible for tax purposes . We assumed $1 .0 billion of outstanding debt as a result of our acquisition of National and recorded it at its fair value of $1 .105 billion . The excess of the fair value over the stated value is amortized as a reduction to Interest and debt expense over the term of the debt . In 2011, we recognized $9 million related to the amortization of the excess fair value . The amount of National’s revenue included in our Consolidated statements of income for the period from the acquisition date to December 31, 2011, was $312 million . We do not measure net income at or below our segment levels . The following unaudited summaries of pro forma combined results of operation for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, give effect to the acquisition as if it had been completed on January 1, 2010 . These pro forma summaries do not reflect any operating efficiencies, cost savings or revenue enhancements that may be achieved by the combined companies . In addition, certain non-recurring expenses, such as restructuring charges and retention bonuses that will be incurred within the first 12 months after the acquisition, are not reflected in the pro forma summaries . These pro forma summaries are presented for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of operations would have been had the acquisition taken place as of that date, nor are they indicative of future consolidated results of operations . Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Earnings per common share — diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 14,805 2,438 2.05 $ 15,529 3,218 2 .61 For Years Ended December 31, 2011 2010 (unaudited) T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 1 1 Acquisition-related charges We incurred various costs as a result of the acquisition of National that are included in Other consistent with how management measures the performance of its segments . These total acquisition-related charges are as follows: For Year Ended December 31, 2011 R E P O R T A N N U A L Inventory related . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment related . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . As recorded in COR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Severance and other benefits: Change of control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Announced employment reductions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transaction costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retention bonuses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . As recorded in Acquisition charges/divestiture (gain) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total acquisition-related charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 96 15 111 87 41 29 50 48 46 14 315 $426 We recognized costs associated with the adjustments to write up the value of acquired inventory and property, plant and equipment to fair value as of the acquisition date . These costs are in addition to the normal expensing of the acquired assets based on their carrying or book value prior to the acquisition . The total fair-value write-up for the acquired inventory was expensed as that inventory was sold . The total fair-value write-up for the acquired property, plant and equipment was $436 million, which is being depreciated at a rate of about $15 million per quarter beginning in the fourth quarter of 2011 . The amount of recognized amortization of acquired intangible assets resulting from the National acquisition was $87 million for the period from the acquisition date to December 31, 2011 . Amortization of intangible assets is based on estimated useful lives varying between two and ten years . Severance and other benefits costs relate to former National employees who have been or will be terminated after the closing date . These costs total $70 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, with $41 million in charges related to change of control provisions under existing employment agreements and $29 million in charges for announced employment reductions affecting about 350 jobs . All of these jobs will be eliminated by the end of 2012 as a result of redundancies and cost efficiency measures, with approximately $20 million of additional expense to be recognized in 2012 . Of the $70 million in charges recognized, $14 million was paid in 2011 . The remaining $56 million will be paid in 2012 . Stock-based compensation of $50 million was recognized for the accelerated vesting of equity awards upon the termination of employees . Additional stock-based compensation will be recognized over any remaining service periods . Transaction costs include expenses incurred in connection with the National acquisition, such as investment advisory, legal, accounting and printing fees, as well as bridge financing costs incurred in April 2011 . Retention bonuses reflect amounts expected to be paid to former National employees who fulfill agreed-upon service period obligations and will be recognized ratably over the required service period . 3. Losses associated with the earthquake in Japan On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 9 .0 earthquake struck near two of our three semiconductor manufacturing facilities in Japan . Our manufacturing site in Miho suffered substantial damage during the earthquake, our facility in Aizu experienced significantly less damage and our site in Hiji was undamaged . We maintain earthquake insurance policies in Japan for limited coverage for property damage and business interruption losses . Assessment and recovery efforts began immediately at these facilities and officially ended in August . Our Aizu factory recovered first and has been in production since the second quarter, while our Miho factory opened a mini-line for products in mid-April and was back to full production in the third quarter of 2011 . During the year ended December 31, 2011, we incurred gross operating losses of $101 million related to property damage, the underutilization expense we incurred from having our manufacturing assets only partially loaded and costs associated with recovery teams assembled from across the world . These losses have been offset by about $23 million in insurance proceeds related to property damage claims . Almost all of these costs and proceeds are included in COR in the Consolidated statements of income and are recorded in Other . 1 2 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S In addition to the costs associated with the earthquake, we also had an impact to revenue . For the year 2011, we recognized $38 million in insurance proceeds related to business interruption claims . These proceeds were recorded as revenue in Other . We continue to be in discussions with our insurers and their advisors, but at this time we cannot estimate the timing and amount of future proceeds we may ultimately receive from our policies . L A U N N A T R O P E R 4. Restructuring charges Restructuring charges may consist of voluntary or involuntary severance-related charges, asset-related charges and other costs to exit activities . We recognize voluntary termination benefits when the employee accepts the offered benefit arrangement . We recognize involuntary severance-related charges depending on whether the termination benefits are provided under an ongoing benefit arrangement or under a one-time benefit arrangement . If the former, we recognize the charges once they are probable and the amounts are estimable . If the latter, we recognize the charges once the benefits have been communicated to employees . Restructuring activities associated with assets would be recorded as an adjustment to the basis of the asset, not as a liability . When we commit to a plan to abandon a long-lived asset before the end of its previously estimated useful life, we accelerate the recognition of depreciation to reflect the use of the asset over its shortened useful life . When an asset is held to be sold, we write down the carrying value to its net realizable value and cease depreciation . Restructuring actions related to the acquisition of National are discussed in Note 2 above and are reflected on the Acquisition charges/divestiture (gain) line of our Consolidated statements of income . 2011 actions In the fourth quarter of 2011, we recognized restructuring charges associated with the announced plans to close two older semiconductor manufacturing facilities in Hiji, Japan, and Houston, Texas, over the next 18 months . Combined, these facilities supported about 4 percent of TI’s revenue in 2011, and each employs about 500 people . As needed, production from these facilities will be moved to other more advanced TI factories . The total charge for these closures is estimated at $215 million, of which $112 million was recognized in the fourth quarter and the remainder will be incurred over the next seven quarters . The Restructuring charges recognized in the fourth quarter of 2011 are included in Other and consisted of $107 million for severance and benefit costs and $5 million of accelerated depreciation of the facilities’ assets . Of the estimated $215 million total cost, about $135 million will be for severance and related benefits, about $30 million will be for accelerated depreciation of facility assets and about $50 million will be for other exit costs . Previous actions In October 2008, we announced actions to reduce expenses in our Wireless segment, especially our baseband operation . In January 2009, we announced actions that included broad-based employment reductions to align our spending with weakened demand . Combined, these actions eliminated about 3,900 jobs; they were completed in 2009 . The table below reflects the changes in accrued restructuring balances associated with these actions: Accrual at December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-cash items (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Remaining accrual at December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-cash items (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Remaining accrual at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2011 Actions Previous Actions Severance and Benefits Other Charges Severance and Benefits Other Charges $ — — — — — 107 (11) — $ 96 $ — — — — — 5 (5) — $ — $ 84 33 (33) (62) 22 — — (9) $ 13 $ 10 — — (2) 8 — — (1) $ 7 Total $ 94 33 (33) (64) 30 112 (16) (10) $ 116 (a) Reflects charges for stock-based compensation, postretirement benefit plan settlement, curtailment, special termination benefits and accelerated depreciation . The accrual balances above are a component of Accrued expenses and other liabilities or Deferred credits and other liabilities on our Consolidated balance sheets, depending on the expected timing of payment . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 1 3 Restructuring charges recognized by segment from the actions described above are as follows: R E P O R T A N N U A L Analog . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $13 6 Embedded Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 10 Wireless . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 4 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 $33 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 112 $ 84 43 62 23 $212 2011 2010 2009 5. Stock-based compensation We have stock options outstanding to participants under various long-term incentive plans . We also have assumed stock options that were granted by companies that we later acquired, including National . Unless the options are acquisition-related replacement options, the option price per share may not be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the grant . Substantially all the options have a ten-year term and vest ratably over four years . Our options generally continue to vest after the option recipient retires . We also have restricted stock units (RSUs) outstanding under the long-term incentive plans . Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of TI common stock on the vesting date, which is generally four years after the date of grant . Upon vesting, the shares are issued without payment by the grantee . RSUs generally do not continue to vest after the recipient’s retirement date . We have options and RSUs outstanding to non-employee directors under various director compensation plans . The plans generally provide for annual grants of stock options and RSUs, a one-time grant of RSUs to each new non-employee director and the issuance of TI common stock upon the distribution of stock units credited to deferred compensation accounts established for such directors . We also have an employee stock purchase plan under which options are offered to all eligible employees in amounts based on a percentage of the employee’s compensation . Under the plan, the option price per share is 85 percent of the fair market value on the exercise date, and options have a three-month term . Total stock-based compensation expense recognized was as follows: Stock-based compensation expense recognized in: Cost of revenue (COR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Research and development (R&D) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 40 58 121 50 $ 269 $ 36 53 101 — $ 190 $ 35 54 97 — $ 186 2011 2010 2009 These amounts include expense related to non-qualified stock options, RSUs and stock options offered under our employee stock purchase plan and are net of expected forfeitures . We issue awards of non-qualified stock options generally with graded vesting provisions (e .g ., 25 percent per year for four years) . We recognize the related compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the minimum service period required for vesting of the award . For awards to employees who are retirement eligible or nearing retirement eligibility, we recognize compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the longer of the service period required to be performed by the employee in order to earn the award, or a six-month period . Our RSUs generally vest four years after the date of grant . We recognize the related compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . National acquisition-related equity awards In connection with the acquisition of National, we assumed certain stock options and RSUs granted by National, which were converted into the right to receive TI stock . The awards we assumed were measured at the acquisition date based on the estimate of fair value, which was a total of $147 million . A portion of that fair value, $22 million, which represented the pre-combination vested service provided by employees to National, was included in the total consideration transferred as part of the acquisition . As of the acquisition date, the remaining portion of the fair value of those awards was $125 million, representing post-combination stock-based compensation expense that would be recognized as these employees provide service over the remaining vesting periods . At December 31, 2011, unrecognized compensation expense was $68 million . 1 4 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Fair-value methods and assumptions We account for all awards granted under our various stock-based compensation plans at fair value . We estimate the fair values for non-qualified stock options under long-term incentive and director compensation plans using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions (these assumptions exclude options assumed in connection with the National acquisition): L A U N N A T R O P E R Weighted average grant date fair value, per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10.37 Weighted average assumptions used: 2011 2010 $6 .61 2009 $5 .43 Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected lives (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk-free interest rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected dividend yields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30% 6.9 2.61% 1.51% 32% 6 .4 2 .83% 2 .08% 48% 5 .9 2 .63% 2 .94% We determine expected volatility on all options granted after July 1, 2005, using available implied volatility rates . We believe that market-based measures of implied volatility are currently the best available indicators of the expected volatility used in these estimates . We determine expected lives of options based on the historical option exercise experience of our optionees using a rolling ten-year average . We believe the historical experience method is the best estimate of future exercise patterns currently available . Risk-free interest rates are determined using the implied yield currently available for zero-coupon U .S . government issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the options . Expected dividend yields are based on the approved annual dividend rate in effect and the current market price of our common stock at the time of grant . No assumption for a future dividend rate change is included unless there is an approved plan to change the dividend in the near term . The fair value per share of RSUs that we grant is determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant . Our employee stock purchase plan is a discount-purchase plan and consequently the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is not used to determine the fair value per share of these awards . The fair value per share under this plan equals the amount of the discount . Long-term incentive and director compensation plans Stock option and RSU transactions under our long-term incentive and director compensation plans during 2011, including stock options and RSUs assumed in connection with the National acquisition, were as follows: Stock Options RSUs Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share Outstanding grants, December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . 150,135,013 Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,310,816 Assumed in National acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,316,283 Vested RSUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Expired and forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (22,906,524) Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (25,582,194) Outstanding grants, December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . 113,273,394 $27 .70 34.55 15.75 — 42.59 24.91 $25.79 Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value per Share $23 .06 33.20 27.22 28.96 24.43 — $25.09 Shares 18,567,365 5,879,409 4,884,774 (5,359,066) (613,636) — 23,358,846 The weighted average grant-date fair value of RSUs granted during the years 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $33 .20, $23 .47 and $15 .78 per share, respectively . For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the total fair value of shares vested from RSU grants was $155 million, $51 million and $28 million, respectively . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 1 5 R E P O R T A N N U A L Summarized information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2011, including options assumed in connection with the National acquisition, is as follows: Range of Exercise Prices $ $ .26 to 10.00 10.01 to 20.00 20.01 to 30.00 30.01 to 38.40 .26 to 38.40 Number Outstanding (Shares) 13,813 26,219,258 44,961,810 42,078,513 113,273,394 Stock Options Outstanding Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share 1.1 3.8 5.1 4.3 4.5 $ 6.64 15.66 24.98 32.99 $ 25.79 Options Exercisable Number Exercisable (Shares) 13,813 18,859,398 31,390,099 31,971,009 82,234,319 Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share $ 6.64 15.91 25.38 32.49 $25.97 During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the aggregate intrinsic value (i .e ., the difference in the closing market price and the exercise price paid by the optionee) of options exercised was $231 million, $140 million and $21 million, respectively . Summarized information as of December 31, 2011, about outstanding stock options that are vested and expected to vest, as well as stock options that are currently exercisable, is as follows: Outstanding Stock Options (Fully Vested and Expected to Vest) (a) Options Exercisable Number of outstanding (shares) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average remaining contractual life (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average exercise price per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intrinsic value (millions of dollars) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112,230,358 4.5 26.03 539 $ $ 82,234,319 3.2 25.97 370 $ $ (a) Includes effects of expected forfeitures of approximately 1 million shares . Excluding the effects of expected forfeitures, the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding was $543 million . As of December 31, 2011, the total future compensation cost related to equity awards not yet recognized in the Consolidated statements of income was $477 million; $144 million related to unvested stock options and $333 million related to RSUs, of which $2 million and $66 million were associated with the National acquisition, respectively . The $477 million will be recognized as follows: $192 million in 2012, $153 million in 2013, $98 million in 2014 and $34 million in 2015 . Employee stock purchase plan Options outstanding under the employee stock purchase plan at December 31, 2011, had an exercise price of $25 .29 per share (85 percent of the fair market value of TI common stock on the date of automatic exercise) . Of the total outstanding options, none were exercisable at year-end 2011 . Employee stock purchase plan transactions during 2011 were as follows: Outstanding grants, December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outstanding grants, December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Shares) 487,871 2,200,718 (2,108,494) 580,095 Exercise Price $27 .83 26.04 26.66 $25.29 The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted under the employee stock purchase plans during the years 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $4 .59, $3 .97 and $3 .13 per share, respectively . During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the total intrinsic value of options exercised under these plans was $10 million, $9 million and $10 million, respectively . Effect on shares outstanding and treasury shares Our practice is to issue shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options generally from treasury shares and, on a limited basis, from previously unissued shares . We settled stock option plan exercises using treasury shares of 27,308,311 in 2011; 19,077,274 in 2010 and 6,695,583 in 2009; and previously unissued common shares of 390,438 in 2011; 342,380 in 2010 and 93,648 in 2009 . Upon vesting of RSUs, we issued treasury shares of 3,822,475 in 2011; 1,392,790 in 2010 and 977,728 in 2009, and previously unissued common shares of 73,852 in 2011, with none in 2010 and 2009 . 1 6 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Shares available for future grant and reserved for issuance are summarized below: Shares Long-term Incentive and Director Compensation Plans Reserved for issuance (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and RSUs . . . Available for future grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224,383,737 (136,755,907) 87,627,830 Employee Stock Purchase Plan 27,967,317 (580,095) 27,387,222 Total 252,351,054 (137,336,002) 115,015,052 As of December 31, 2011 L A U N N A T R O P E R (a) Includes 123,667 shares credited to directors’ deferred compensation accounts that may settle in shares of TI common stock . These shares are not included as grants outstanding at December 31, 2011 . Effect on cash flows Cash received from the exercise of options was $690 million in 2011, $407 million in 2010 and $109 million in 2009 . The related net tax impact realized was $45 million, $21 million and ($2) million (which includes excess tax benefits realized of $31 million, $13 million and $1 million) in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively . 6. Profit sharing plans Profit sharing benefits are generally formulaic and determined by one or more subsidiary or company-wide financial metrics . We pay profit sharing benefits primarily under the company-wide TI Employee Profit Sharing Plan . This plan provides for profit sharing to be paid based solely on TI’s operating margin for the full calendar year . Under this plan, TI must achieve a minimum threshold of 10 percent operating margin before any profit sharing is paid . At 10 percent operating margin, profit sharing will be 2 percent of eligible payroll . The maximum amount of profit sharing available under the plan is 20 percent of eligible payroll, which is paid only if TI’s operating margin is at or above 35 percent for a full calendar year . We recognized $143 million, $279 million and $102 million of profit sharing expense under the TI Employee Profit Sharing Plan in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively . 7. Income taxes Income before income taxes U.S. Non-U.S. Total 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,791 3,769 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,375 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,164 782 642 $2,955 4,551 2,017 Provision (benefit) for income taxes U.S. Federal Non-U.S. U.S. State Total 2011: Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 692 (154) $ 538 2010: Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,401 (188) $ 1,213 2009: Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 318 124 $ 442 $138 24 $162 $ 92 (2) $ 90 $ 79 23 $102 $ 8 11 $19 $18 2 $20 $ 4 (1) $ 3 $ 838 (119) $ 719 $1,511 (188) $1,323 $ 401 146 $ 547 T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 1 7 Principal reconciling items from income tax computed at the statutory federal rate follow: R E P O R T A N N U A L Computed tax at statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,034 Non-U .S . effective tax rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (245) U .S . R&D tax credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (58) U .S . tax benefit for manufacturing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (31) Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Total provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 719 $1,593 (184) (54) (63) 31 $1,323 2011 2010 2009 $ 706 (123) (28) (21) 13 $ 547 The primary components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows: Deferred income tax assets: Inventories and related reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Postretirement benefit costs recognized in AOCI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred loss and tax credit carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income tax liabilities: Acquisition-related intangibles and fair-value adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued retirement costs (defined benefit and retiree health care) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net deferred income tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ December 31, 2011 2010 913 431 400 357 323 217 2,641 (178) 2,463 (1,096) (180) (147) (92) (60) (1,575) 888 $ 525 404 220 357 251 208 1,965 (3) 1,962 (21) (190) (83) (26) (31) (351) $1,611 As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, net deferred income tax assets of $888 million and $1 .61 billion were presented in the balance sheets, based on tax jurisdiction, as deferred income tax assets of $1 .50 billion and $1 .70 billion and deferred income tax liabilities of $607 million and $86 million, respectively . The decrease in net deferred income tax assets from December 31, 2010, to December 31, 2011, is due to the recording of $881 million of net deferred tax liabilities associated with the acquisition of National, partially offset by the $119 million deferred tax provision . We make an ongoing assessment regarding the realization of U .S . and non-U .S . deferred tax assets . In 2011, we recognized a net increase of $175 million in our valuation allowance . This increase was due to valuation allowances on unutilized tax credits associated with the acquisition of National . While the net deferred assets of $2 .46 billion at December 31, 2011, are not assured of realization, our assessment is that a valuation allowance is not required on this balance . This assessment is based on our evaluation of relevant criteria including the existence of deferred tax liabilities that can be used to absorb deferred tax assets, taxable income in prior carryback years and expectations for future taxable income . We have U .S . and non-U .S . tax loss carryforwards of approximately $202 million, of which $124 million expire through the year 2021 . Provision has been made for deferred taxes on undistributed earnings of non-U .S . subsidiaries to the extent that dividend payments from these subsidiaries are expected to result in additional tax liability . The remaining undistributed earnings (approximately $4 .12 billion at December 31, 2011) have been indefinitely reinvested; therefore, no provision has been made for taxes due upon remittance of these earnings . The indefinitely reinvested earnings of our non-U .S . subsidiaries are primarily invested in tangible assets such as inventory and property, plant and equipment . Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability is not practical because of the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation . Cash payments made for income taxes, net of refunds, were $902 million, $1 .47 billion and $331 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively . 1 8 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Uncertain tax positions We operate in a number of tax jurisdictions, and our income tax returns are subject to examination by tax authorities in those jurisdictions who may challenge any item on these tax returns . Because the matters challenged by authorities are typically complex, their ultimate outcome is uncertain . Before any benefit can be recorded in the financial statements, we must determine that it is “more likely than not” that a tax position will be sustained by the appropriate tax authorities . We recognize accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions and penalties as components of OI&E . L A U N N A T R O P E R The changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions are summarized as follows: 2011 Balance, January 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 103 Additions based on tax positions related to the current year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Additions from the acquisition of National . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 Additions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Reductions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (39) Settlements with tax authorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) Balance, December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 210 Interest income (expense) recognized in the year ended December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1 Accrued interest payable (receivable) as of December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3 2010 $ 56 12 — 50 (12) (3) $ 103 $ (2) $ (5) 2009 $ 148 10 — 6 (18) (90) $ 56 $ — $ (9) The liability for uncertain tax positions and the accrued interest payable are components of Deferred credits and other liabilities on our December 31, 2011, balance sheet . Within the $210 million liability for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2011, are uncertain tax positions totaling $233 million that, if recognized, would impact the tax rate . If these tax liabilities are ultimately realized, $83 million of deferred tax assets would also be realized, primarily related to refunds from counterparty jurisdictions resulting from procedures for relief from double taxation . Within the $103 million liability for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2010, are uncertain tax positions totaling $136 million that, if recognized, would impact the tax rate . If these tax liabilities are ultimately realized, $101 million of deferred tax assets would also be realized, primarily related to refunds from counterparty jurisdictions resulting from procedures for relief from double taxation . As of December 31, 2011, the statute of limitations remains open for U .S . federal tax returns for 1999 and following years . Audits of our U .S . federal tax returns through 2006 have been completed except for certain pending tax treaty procedures for relief from double taxation . These procedures pertain to U .S . federal tax returns for the years 2003 through 2007 . In non-U .S . jurisdictions, the years open to audit represent the years still subject to the statute of limitations . With respect to major jurisdictions outside the U .S ., our subsidiaries are no longer subject to income tax audits for years before 2004 . We are unable to estimate the range of any reasonably possible increase or decrease in uncertain tax positions that may occur within the next 12 months resulting from the eventual outcome of the years currently under audit or appeal . However, we do not anticipate any such outcome will result in a material change to our financial condition or results of operations . U .S . federal tax returns for recently acquired National are currently under audit for tax years through 2009 . It is possible that issues that are the subject of that audit could be resolved in the next 12 months and result in a material change in our estimate of uncertain tax positions . 8. Financial instruments and risk concentration Financial instruments We hold derivative financial instruments such as forward foreign currency exchange contracts, interest rate swaps and forward purchase contracts, the fair value of which is not material at December 31, 2011 . Our forward foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding at December 31, 2011, had a notional value of $516 million to hedge our non-U .S . dollar net balance sheet exposures (including $253 million to sell Japanese yen, $105 million to sell euros and $39 million to sell British pound sterling) . Our investments in cash equivalents, short-term investments and certain long-term investments, as well as our postretirement plan assets, contingent consideration and deferred compensation liabilities are carried at fair value, which is described in Note 9 . The carrying values for other current financial assets and liabilities, such as accounts receivable and accounts payable, approximate fair value due to the short maturity of such instruments . The carrying value of our long-term debt approximates the fair value . Risk concentration Financial instruments that could subject us to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable . In order to manage our credit risk exposure, we place cash investments in investment-grade debt securities and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer . We also limit counterparties on forward foreign currency exchange contracts to financial institutions rated no lower than A3/A- . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 1 9 R E P O R T A N N U A L Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to our large number of customers and their dispersion across different industries and geographic areas . We maintain an allowance for losses based on the expected collectability of accounts receivable . These allowances are deducted from accounts receivable on our Consolidated balance sheets . Details of these allowances are as follows: Accounts receivable allowances Balance at Beginning of Year Additions Charged (Credited) to Operating Results Recoveries and Write-offs, Net Balance at End of Year 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $18 23 30 $ 1 (4) 1 $ — (1) (8) $19 18 23 9. Valuation of debt and equity investments and certain liabilities Debt and equity investments We classify our investments as available for sale, trading, equity method or cost method . Most of our investments are classified as available for sale . Available-for-sale and trading securities are stated at fair value, which is generally based on market prices, broker quotes or, when necessary, financial models (see fair-value discussion below) . Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded as an increase or decrease, net of taxes, in AOCI on our Consolidated balance sheets . We record other-than-temporary losses (impairments) on available-for-sale securities in OI&E in our Consolidated statements of income . We classify certain mutual funds as trading securities . These mutual funds hold a variety of debt and equity investments intended to generate returns that offset changes in certain deferred compensation liabilities . We record changes in the fair value of these mutual funds and the related deferred compensation liabilities in SG&A . Changes in the fair value of debt securities classified as trading securities are recorded in OI&E . Our other investments are not measured at fair value but are accounted for using either the equity method or cost method . These investments consist of interests in venture capital funds and other non-marketable equity securities . Gains and losses from equity method investments are reflected in OI&E based on our ownership share of the investee’s financial results . Gains and losses on cost method investments are recorded in OI&E when realized or when an impairment of the investment’s value is warranted based on our assessment of the recoverability of each investment . Details of our investments and related unrealized gains and losses included in AOCI are as follows: December 31, 2011 December 31, 2010 Cash and Cash Equivalents Short-term Investments Long-term Investments Cash and Cash Equivalents Short-term Investments Long-term Investments Measured at fair value: Available-for-sale securities Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U .S . Government agency and Treasury securities . . . . . Auction-rate securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 55 135 430 — Trading securities Auction-rate securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 620 Other measurement basis: Equity-method investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost-method investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash on hand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 372 $ 992 Amounts included in AOCI from available-for-sale securities: $ — 159 1,691 — 93 — 1,943 — — — $ 1,943 $ — — — 41 — 169 210 32 23 — $ 265 $ 167 44 855 — — — 1,066 — — 253 $ 1,319 $ — 649 1,081 23 — — 1,753 — — — $ 1,753 $ — — — 257 — 139 396 36 21 — $ 453 Unrealized gains (pre-tax) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrealized losses (pre-tax) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — 5 $ $ — $ $ — $ 1 1 $ — $ 22 2 0 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the majority of unrealized losses included in AOCI were associated with auction-rate securities classified as securities that are available for sale . We have determined that our available-for-sale investments with unrealized losses are not other-than-temporarily impaired as we expect to recover the entire cost basis of these securities . We do not intend to sell these investments, nor do we expect to be required to sell these investments, before a recovery of the cost basis . In the second quarter of 2011, we recategorized certain auction-rate securities from an available-for-sale classification to a trading classification, as we intend to sell them . For the year ended December 31, 2011, we did not recognize in earnings any credit losses related to these investments . Proceeds from sales, redemptions and maturities of short-term available-for-sale securities, excluding cash equivalents, were $3 .55 billion, $2 .56 billion and $2 .03 billion in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively . Gross realized gains and losses from these sales were not significant . L A U N N A T R O P E R The following table presents the aggregate maturities of investments in debt securities classified as available for sale at December 31, 2011: Due One year or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . One to three years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Greater than three years (auction-rate securities) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fair Value $ 1,902 568 41 Gross realized gains and losses from sales of long-term investments were not significant for 2011, 2010 or 2009 . Other-than-temporary declines and impairments in the values of these investments recognized in OI&E were $2 million, $1 million and $14 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively . Fair-value considerations We measure and report certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis . Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date . The three-level hierarchy discussed below indicates the extent and level of judgment used to estimate fair-value measurements . Level 1 – Uses unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date . Level 2 – Uses inputs other than Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date through correlation with market data, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and quoted prices in markets that are not active . Level 2 also includes assets and liabilities that are valued using models or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment since the input assumptions used in the models, such as interest rates and volatility factors, are corroborated by readily observable data . Our Level 2 assets consist of corporate obligations, some U .S . government agency securities and auction-rate securities that have been called for redemption . We utilize a third-party data service to provide Level 2 valuations, verifying these valuations for reasonableness relative to unadjusted quotes obtained from brokers or dealers based on observable prices for similar assets in active markets . Level 3 – Uses inputs that are unobservable, supported by little or no market activity and reflect the use of significant management judgment . These values are generally determined using pricing models that utilize management estimates of market participant assumptions . Our auction-rate securities are primarily classified as Level 3 assets . Auction-rate securities are debt instruments with variable interest rates that historically would periodically reset through an auction process . These auctions have not functioned since 2008 . There is no active secondary market for these securities, although limited observable transactions do occasionally occur . As a result, we use a discounted cash flow model to determine the estimated fair value of these investments as of each quarter end . The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates for the amount and timing of future interest and principal payments and the rate of return required by investors to own these securities in the current environment . In making these assumptions, we consider relevant factors including: the formula for each security that defines the interest rate paid to investors in the event of a failed auction; forward projections of the interest rate benchmarks specified in such formulas; the likely timing of principal repayments; the probability of full repayment considering the guarantees by the U .S . Department of Education of the underlying student loans and additional credit enhancements provided through other means; and, publicly available pricing data for student loan asset-backed securities that are not subject to auctions . Our estimate of the rate of return required by investors to own these securities also considers the reduced liquidity for auction-rate securities . To date, we have collected all interest on all of our auction-rate securities when due and expect to continue to do so in the future . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 2 1 R E P O R T A N N U A L The following are our assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 . These tables do not include cash on hand, assets held by our postretirement plans, or assets and liabilities that are measured at historical cost or any basis other than fair value . Fair Value December 31, 2011 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Corporate obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U .S . Government agency and Treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Auction-rate securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 294 2,121 134 169 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,773 $ 55 — 606 — 169 $ 830 $ — $ — — — 134 — $ 134 294 1,515 — — $ 1,809 Liabilities Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 191 Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 191 $ 191 $ 191 $ — $ — $ — $ — Fair Value December 31, 2010 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 167 693 Corporate obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,936 U .S . Government agency and Treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 Auction-rate securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 Mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,215 $ 167 — 1,120 — 139 $ 1,426 $ — $ — — — 257 — $ 257 693 816 23 — $ 1,532 Liabilities Contingent consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 159 Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 167 $ — $ — $ 159 $ 159 — $ — $ 8 — 8 The following table summarizes the change in the fair values for Level 3 assets and liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 . The transfer of auction-rate securities into Level 2 was the result of these securities being called for redemption and all were subsequently redeemed . Balance, December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in fair value of contingent consideration – included in operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in unrealized loss – included in AOCI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Redemptions and sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transfers into Level 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance, December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in fair value of contingent consideration – included in operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in unrealized loss – included in AOCI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Redemptions and sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance, December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Level 3 Auction-rate Securities Contingent Consideration $ 458 — 10 (188) (23) 257 — (1) (122) $ 134 $ 18 (10) — — — 8 (8) — — $ — 2 2 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S L A U N N A T R O P E R 10. Acquisitions and divestitures other than National Acquisitions In October 2010, we acquired our first semiconductor manufacturing site in China, located in the Chengdu High-tech Zone . This included a fully equipped and operational 200-millimeter wafer fabrication facility (fab), as well as a non-operating fab that is being held for future capacity expansion . Additionally, we offered employment to the majority of existing employees at the Chengdu site . We provided transitional supply services through the middle of 2011, while also installing our analog production processes . This acquisition, which was recorded as a business combination, used net cash of $140 million . As contractually agreed, we made an additional payment to the seller in October 2011 . We recorded $158 million of property, plant and equipment, $5 million of inventory, $4 million of other assets and $8 million of expenses . Operating results for the transitional supply services are included in Other . Additionally, we incurred acquisition costs of $2 million . In August 2010, we completed the acquisition of two wafer fabs and equipment in Aizu-Wakamatsu, Japan, for net cash of $130 million . The terms of the acquisition included an operational 200-millimeter fab as well as a non-operating fab capable of either 200-or 300-millimeter production that is being held for future capacity expansion . Additionally, we offered employment to the existing employees at the Aizu site . We provided transitional supply services through 2011, while also installing our analog production processes . The acquisition of the two Aizu wafer fabs and related 200-millimeter equipment was recorded as a business combination for net cash of $59 million . We recorded $42 million of property, plant and equipment, $9 million of inventory and $8 million of expenses, which were charged to COR . Operating results for the transitional supply services are included in Other . In connection with the Aizu acquisition, we also settled a contractual arrangement with a third party for our benefit for net cash of $12 million, which was recorded as a charge in COR in Other . Additionally, we incurred acquisition-related costs of $1 million, which were recorded in SG&A . The Aizu acquisition also included 300-millimeter production tools, which we recorded as a capital purchase for net cash of $58 million . In 2009, we acquired Luminary Micro for net cash of $51 million and other consideration of $7 million . These operations were integrated into our Embedded Processing segment . We also acquired CICLON Semiconductor Device Corporation for net cash of $104 million and other consideration of $7 million . These operations were integrated into our Analog segment . The results of operations for these acquisitions have been included in our financial statements from their respective acquisition dates . Pro forma financial information would not be materially different from amounts reported . Divestitures In November 2010, we divested a product line previously included in Other for $148 million and recognized a gain in operating profit of $144 million . This appears in the Consolidated statements of income on the Acquisition charges/divestiture (gain) line for 2010 . 11. Goodwill and acquisition-related intangibles The following table summarizes the changes in goodwill by segment for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010: Goodwill, December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill, December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Analog $ 638 (8) 630 Additions from acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill, December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,528 $ 4,158 Embedded Processing Wireless $ 172 — 172 — $ 172 $ 82 8 90 — $ 90 Other $ 34 (2) 32 — $ 32 Total $ 926 (2) 924 3,528 $ 4,452 There was no impairment of goodwill during 2011 or 2010 . In the first quarter of 2010, we transferred a low-power wireless product line, including the associated goodwill, from the Analog segment to the Wireless segment . We reduced goodwill in Other by $2 million, which was related to the divestiture noted in Note 10 . The addition to Analog goodwill was from the National acquisition . In 2011, we recognized intangible assets associated with the National acquisition of $2 .96 billion, primarily for developed technology and customer relationships . In 2010, we had no additional intangible assets from an acquisition . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 2 3 The following table shows the components of acquisition-related intangible assets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010: R E P O R T A N N U A L December 31, 2011 December 31, 2010 Amortization Period (Years) Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Acquisition-related intangibles: Developed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . In-process R&D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 10 5 - 8 2 - 10 (a) $ 2,089 822 50 93 $ 3,054 $ 91 34 29 — $ 154 $ 1,998 788 21 93 $ 2,900 $ 155 26 34 — $ 215 $ 100 18 21 — $ 139 $ 55 8 13 — $ 76 (a) In-process R&D is not amortized until the associated project has been completed . Alternatively, if the associated project is determined not to be viable, it will be expensed . Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles was $111 million, $48 million and $48 million for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, primarily related to developed technology . The following table sets forth the estimated amortization of acquisition-related intangibles for the years ended December 31: 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 342 335 321 319 318 1,265 12. Postretirement benefit plans Plan descriptions We have various employee retirement plans including defined benefit, defined contribution and retiree health care benefit plans . For qualifying employees, we offer deferred compensation arrangements . As a part of the National acquisition, we assumed the assets and liabilities of its defined benefit plans, primarily those associated with the United Kingdom and Germany . U.S. retirement plans: Principal retirement plans in the U .S . are qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans (all of which were closed to new participants after November 1997), a defined contribution plan and an enhanced defined contribution plan . The defined benefit pension plans include employees still accruing benefits as well as employees and participants who no longer accrue service-related benefits, but instead, may participate in the enhanced defined contribution plan . Both defined contribution plans offer an employer-matching savings option that allows employees to make pre-tax contributions to various investment choices, including a TI common stock fund . Employees who elected to continue accruing a benefit in the qualified defined benefit pension plans may also participate in the defined contribution plan, where employer-matching contributions are provided for up to 2 percent of the employee’s annual eligible earnings . Employees who elected not to continue accruing a benefit in the defined benefit pension plans, and employees hired after November 1997 and through December 31, 2003, may participate in the enhanced defined contribution plan . This plan provides for a fixed employer contribution of 2 percent of the employee’s annual eligible earnings, plus an employer-matching contribution of up to 4 percent of the employee’s annual eligible earnings . Employees hired after December 31, 2003, do not receive the fixed employer contribution of 2 percent of the employee’s annual eligible earnings . At December 31, 2011 and 2010, as a result of employees’ elections, TI’s U .S . defined contribution plans held shares of TI common stock totaling 22 million shares and 24 million shares valued at $639 million and $792 million, respectively . Dividends paid on these shares for 2011 and 2010 were $13 million for each year . Our aggregate expense for the U .S . defined contribution plans was $55 million in 2011, $50 million in 2010 and $51 million in 2009 . 2 4 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Benefits under the qualified defined benefit pension plan are determined using a formula based upon years of service and the highest five consecutive years of compensation . We intend to contribute amounts to this plan to meet the minimum funding requirements of applicable local laws and regulations, plus such additional amounts as we deem appropriate . The non-qualified defined benefit plans are unfunded and closed to new participants . L A U N N A T R O P E R U.S. retiree health care benefit plan: U .S . employees who meet eligibility requirements are offered medical coverage during retirement . We make a contribution toward the cost of those retiree medical benefits for certain retirees and their dependents . The contribution rates are based upon various factors, the most important of which are an employee’s date of hire, date of retirement, years of service and eligibility for Medicare benefits . The balance of the cost is borne by the plan’s participants . Employees hired after January 1, 2001, are responsible for the full cost of their medical benefits during retirement . Non-U.S. retirement plans: We provide retirement coverage for non-U .S . employees, as required by local laws or to the extent we deem appropriate, through a number of defined benefit and defined contribution plans . Retirement benefits are generally based on an employee’s years of service and compensation . Funding requirements are determined on an individual country and plan basis and are subject to local country practices and market circumstances . As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, as a result of employees’ elections, TI’s non-U .S . defined contribution plans held TI common stock valued at $12 million and $14 million, respectively . Dividends paid on these shares of TI common stock for 2011 and 2010 were not material . Effect on the statements of income and balance sheets Expense related to defined benefit and retiree health care benefit plans was as follows: U.S. Defined Benefit 2010 2011 2009 Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 22 Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (45) Amortization of prior service cost (credit) . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Recognized net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Net periodic benefit cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Settlement charges (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Curtailment charges (credits) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Special termination benefit charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Total, including charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 51 $ 20 45 (49) 1 22 39 37 — — $ 76 $ 20 49 (49) 1 18 39 13 — 6 $ 58 (a) Includes restructuring and non-restructuring related settlement charges . U.S. Retiree Health Care 2009 2010 2011 $ 4 25 (21) 2 13 23 — 5 — $ 28 $ 4 26 (23) 2 12 21 — — — $ 21 $ 4 26 (28) 2 8 12 — 2 — $ 14 Non-U.S. Defined Benefit 2010 2011 2009 $ 41 69 (83) (4) 40 63 — 2 — $ 65 $ 37 62 (73) (3) 30 53 — — — $ 53 $ 40 62 (69) (3) 34 64 15 (9) 3 $ 73 Expenses associated with National’s plans for the period from the acquisition date to December 31, 2011, were $2 million for non-U .S . defined benefit plans . National had no defined benefit plans in the U .S . For the U .S . qualified pension and retiree health care plans, the expected return on the plan assets component of net periodic benefit cost is based upon a market-related value of assets . In accordance with U .S . GAAP, the market-related value of assets generally utilizes a smoothing technique whereby certain gains and losses are phased in over a period of three years . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 2 5 R E P O R T A N N U A L Changes in the benefit obligations and plan assets for the defined benefit and retiree health care benefit plans were as follows: U.S. Defined Benefit U.S. Retiree Health Care 2011 2010 2011 2010 Non-U.S. Defined Benefit 2010 2011 Change in plan benefit obligation: $ 860 Benefit obligation at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 880 20 Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 45 Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 — Participant contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (6) Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (52) — Medicare subsidy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 92 Actuarial (gain) loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (131) — Curtailments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) — Assumed with National acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — Special termination benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 — Plan amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — Effects of exchange rate changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $ 880 Benefit obligation at end of year (BO) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 959 Change in plan assets: $ 859 Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 833 76 Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 30 Employer contributions (funding of qualified plans) . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 5 Employer contributions (payments for non-qualified plans) . . . . . . . . 2 — Participant contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — Assumed with National acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (6) Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (52) Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (131) — Effects of exchange rate changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $ 833 Fair value of plan assets at end of year (FVPA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 914 $ (47) Funded status (FVPA – BO) at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (45) $ 473 4 25 18 (43) 4 19 — 4 — — 17 — $ 521 $ 404 6 46 — 18 — (43) — — $ 431 $ (90) $ 472 4 26 17 (45) 3 (4) — — — — — — $ 473 $ 374 25 33 — 17 — (45) — — $ 404 $ (69) Amounts recognized on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2011, were as follows: Overfunded retirement plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Underfunded retirement plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Funded status (FVPA – BO) at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 11 (2) (54) $(45) $ — — (90) $(90) U.S. Defined Benefit U.S. Retiree Health Care Amounts recognized on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2010, were as follows: Overfunded retirement plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Underfunded retirement plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Funded status (FVPA – BO) at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1 (3) (45) $(47) $ — — (69) $(69) U.S. Defined Benefit U.S. Retiree Health Care $ 2,217 41 69 1 (72) — 91 (1) (3) 301 — — 104 $ 2,748 $ 1,835 53 72 — 1 235 (72) (1) 88 $ 2,211 $ (537) Non-U.S. Defined Benefit $ 29 (9) (557) $ (537) Non-U.S. Defined Benefit $ 30 (7) (405) $ (382) $ 1,945 37 62 3 (70) — 132 — — — — (1) 109 $ 2,217 $ 1,672 95 53 — 3 — (70) — 82 $ 1,835 $ (382) Total $ 40 (11) (701) $ (672) Total $ 31 (10) (519) $ (498) Accumulated benefit obligations, which represent the benefit obligations excluding the impact of future salary increases, were $875 million and $813 million at year-end 2011 and 2010, respectively, for the U .S . defined benefit plans, and $2 .54 billion and $2 .02 billion at year-end 2011 and 2010, respectively, for the non-U .S . defined benefit plans . 2 6 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S The amounts recorded in AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, are detailed below by plan type: U.S. Defined Benefit Prior Service Cost Net Actuarial Loss U.S. Retiree Health Care Net Actuarial Loss Prior Service Cost Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Total Net Actuarial Loss Prior Service Cost Net Actuarial Loss Prior Service Cost L A U N N A T R O P E R AOCI balance, December 31, 2010 (net of tax) . . . . . $ 157 $ 1 $ 126 $ 6 $ 421 $ (23) $ 704 $ (16) Changes in AOCI by category in 2011 Annual adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reclassification of recognized transactions . . . Less tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . Total change to AOCI in 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . AOCI balance, December 31, 2011 (net of tax) . . . . (3) (23) 9 (17) $ 140 — (1) — (1) 34 (12) (8) 14 $ — $ 140 17 (4) (5) 8 $ 14 158 (40) (39) 79 $ 500 (3) 3 — — $ (23) 189 (75) (38) 76 $ 780 14 (2) (5) 7 $ (9) The estimated amounts of net actuarial loss and unrecognized prior service cost (credit) included in AOCI as of December 31, 2011, that are expected to be amortized into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are: $16 million and $1 million for the U .S . defined benefit plans; $13 million and $4 million for the U .S . retiree health care plan; and $48 million and ($4) million for the non-U .S . defined benefit plans . Information on plan assets We report and measure the plan assets of our defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans at fair value . The tables below set forth the fair value of our plan assets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, using the same three-level hierarchy of fair-value inputs described in Note 9 . Fair Value at December 31, 2011 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets of U.S. defined benefit plan Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ U .S . Government agency and Treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U .S . bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U .S . equity funds and option collars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Limited partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 266 309 229 52 35 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 914 Assets of U.S. retiree health care plan Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ U .S . bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U .S . equity funds and option collars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 175 159 47 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 431 Assets of non-U.S. defined benefit plans Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Local market bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International/global bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Local market equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International/global equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 1,129 335 133 521 43 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,211 $ — $ $ — $ 244 — — — — $ 244 175 40 — $ 215 $ 41 209 3 13 136 — $ 402 23 22 309 229 52 — $ 635 50 — 119 47 $ 216 $ 9 920 332 120 385 25 $1,791 $— — — — — 35 $ 35 $— — — — $— $— — — — — 18 $ 18 T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 2 7 Fair Value at December 31, 2010 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 R E P O R T A N N U A L Assets of U.S. defined benefit plan Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ U .S . Government agency and Treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U .S . bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U .S . equity funds and option collars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Limited partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 220 281 195 60 34 $ 833 Assets of U.S. retiree health care plan Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U .S . bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U .S . equity funds and option collars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 41 165 144 54 $ 404 $ — $ 196 — — — — $ 196 165 41 — $ 206 $ — $ 43 24 281 195 60 — $ 603 41 — 103 54 $ 198 Assets of non-U.S. defined benefit plans Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Local market bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International/global bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Local market equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International/global equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 669 211 300 555 81 $ 1,835 $ — $ — — 42 — — $ 42 19 669 211 258 555 30 $ 1,742 $ — — — — — 34 $ 34 $ — — — — $ — $ — — — — — 51 $ 51 The investments in our major benefit plans largely consist of low-cost, broad-market index funds to mitigate risks of concentration within market sectors . In recent years, our investment policy has shifted toward a closer matching of the interest rate sensitivity of the plan assets and liabilities . The appropriate mix of equity and bond investments is determined primarily through the use of detailed asset-liability modeling studies that look to balance the impact of changes in the discount rate against the need to provide asset growth to cover future service cost . Most of our plans around the world have added a greater proportion of fixed income securities with return characteristics that are more closely aligned with changes in the liabilities caused by discount rate volatility . For the U .S . plans, we utilize an option collar strategy to reduce the volatility of returns on investments in U .S . equity funds . The only Level 3 assets in our worldwide benefit plans are certain private equity limited partnerships in our U .S . pension plan and diversified hedge and property funds in a non-U .S . pension plan . These investments are valued using inputs from the fund managers and internal models . The following table summarizes the change in the fair values for Level 3 plan assets for the years ending December 31, 2011 and 2010: Level 3 Plan Assets U.S. Defined Benefit Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Balance, December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Redemptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrealized gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance, December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Redemptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrealized gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Assumed with National acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance, December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 34 — — 34 — 1 — $ 35 $ 49 (4) 6 51 (51) — 18 $ 18 2 8 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S L A U N N A T R O P E R Assumptions and investment policies Defined Benefit 2010 2011 U.S. Retiree Health Care 2011 2010 Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations: U .S . discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.92% 5 .58% 4.89% 5 .48% Non-U .S . discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.89% 2 .79% U .S . average long-term pay progression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.50% 3 .40% Non-U .S . average long-term pay progression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.18% 3 .24% Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost: U .S . discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.58% 5 .61% 5.48% 5 .54% Non-U .S . discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.79% 3 .23% U .S . long-term rate of return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.25% 6 .50% 5.50% 6 .00% Non-U .S . long-term rate of return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.17% 4 .23% U .S . average long-term pay progression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.40% 3 .00% Non-U .S . average long-term pay progression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.24% 3 .06% We utilize a variety of methods to select an appropriate discount rate depending on the depth of the corporate bond market in the country in which the benefit plan operates . In the U .S ., we use a settlement approach whereby a portfolio of bonds is selected from the universe of actively traded high-quality U .S . corporate bonds . The selected portfolio is designed to provide cash flows sufficient to pay the plan’s expected benefit payments when due . The resulting discount rate reflects the rate of return of the selected portfolio of bonds . For our non-U .S . locations with a sufficient number of actively traded high-quality bonds, an analysis is performed in which the projected cash flows from the defined benefit plans are discounted against a yield curve constructed with an appropriate universe of high-quality corporate bonds available in each country . In this manner, a present value is developed . The discount rate selected is the single equivalent rate that produces the same present value . Both the settlement approach and the yield curve approach produce a discount rate that recognizes each plan’s distinct liability characteristics . For countries that lack a sufficient corporate bond market, a government bond index adjusted for an appropriate risk premium is used to establish the discount rate . Assumptions for the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets are based on future expectations for returns for each asset class and the effect of periodic target asset allocation rebalancing . We adjust the results for the payment of reasonable expenses of the plan from plan assets . We believe our assumptions are appropriate based on the investment mix and long-term nature of the plans’ investments . Assumptions used for the non-U .S . defined benefit plans reflect the different economic environments within the various countries . The table below shows target allocation ranges for the plans that hold a substantial majority of the defined benefit assets . Asset category Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income securities and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U.S. Defined Benefit U.S. Retiree Health Care Non-U.S. Defined Benefit 35% 65% 50% 50% 25% - 60% 40% - 75% We intend to rebalance the plans’ investments when they are not within the target allocation ranges . Additional contributions are invested consistent with the target ranges and may be used to rebalance the portfolio . The investment allocations and individual investments are chosen with regard to the duration of the obligations of each plan . Most of the assets in the retiree health care benefit plan are invested in a series of Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) trusts . Weighted average asset allocations at December 31, are as follows: Asset category U.S. Defined Benefit U.S. Retiree Health Care Non-U.S. Defined Benefit 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35% 35% 48% 49% 32% 49% Fixed income securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63% 60% 41% 41% 66% 50% 1% Cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11% 10% 2% 2% 5% T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 2 9 None of the plan assets related to the defined benefit pension plans and retiree health care benefit plan are directly invested in TI common stock . As of December 31, 2011, we do not expect to return any of the plans’ assets to TI in the next 12 months . Contributions to the plans meet or exceed all minimum funding requirements . We expect to contribute about $120 million to our retirement benefit plans in 2012 . R E P O R T A N N U A L The following table shows the benefits we expect to pay to participants from the plans in the next ten years . Almost all of the payments will be made from plan assets and not from company assets . 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017–2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 160 92 91 94 95 451 $ 35 37 39 41 43 213 $ (4) (4) (4) (2) (2) (10) U.S. Defined Benefit U.S. Retiree Health Care Medicare Subsidy Non-U.S. Defined Benefit $ 77 80 82 89 92 525 Assumed health care cost trend rates for the U .S . retiree health care plan at December 31 are as follows: 2010 Assumed health care cost trend rate for next year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.0% 9 .0% Ultimate trend rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0% 5 .0% Year in which ultimate trend rate is reached . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 2016 2011 Increasing or decreasing health care cost trend rates by one percentage point would have increased or decreased the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for the U .S . retiree health care plan at December 31, 2011, by $28 million or $24 million and increased or decreased the service cost and interest cost components of 2011 plan expense by $1 million . Deferred compensation arrangements We have a deferred compensation plan, which allows U .S . employees whose base salary and management responsibility exceed a certain level to defer receipt of a portion of their cash compensation . Payments under this plan are made based on the participant’s distribution election and plan balance . Participants can earn a return on their deferred compensation based on notional investments in the same investment funds that are offered in our defined contribution plans . As of December 31, 2011, our liability to participants of the deferred compensation plan was $150 million and is recorded in Deferred credits and other liabilities on our Consolidated balance sheets . This amount reflects the accumulated participant deferrals and earnings thereon as of that date . No assets are held in trust for the deferred compensation plan and so we remain liable to the participants . To serve as an economic hedge against changes in fair values of this liability, we invest in similar mutual funds that are recorded in Long-term investments . We record changes in the fair value of the liability and the related investment in SG&A (see Note 9) . In connection with the National acquisition, we assumed its deferred compensation plan . As of December 31, 2011, this consisted of $41 million of obligations and matching assets held in a Rabbi trust . No further contributions will be made into this plan . 13. Debt and lines of credit Debt balances include amounts assumed related to the National acquisition measured at fair value as of the acquisition date . Short-term borrowings We maintain lines of credit to support commercial paper borrowings, if any, and to provide additional liquidity through bank loans . As of December 31, 2011, we had a variable-rate revolving credit facility that allows us to borrow up to $920 million through August 2012 . We have a second variable-rate revolving credit facility that allows us to borrow an additional $1 billion until July 2012 . These facilities carry a variable rate of interest indexed to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) . On July 14, 2011, for general corporate purposes and to maintain cash balances at desired levels, we issued an aggregate of $1 .2 billion of commercial paper, which was supported by these existing revolving credit facilities . During the fourth quarter, we repaid $200 million of those borrowings . As of December 31, 2011, the balance of commercial paper outstanding was $1 .0 billion . The weighted-borrowing rate for the commercial paper outstanding as of December 31, 2011, was 0 .25 percent . 3 0 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Long-term debt On May 23, 2011, we issued fixed- and floating-rate long-term debt to help fund the National acquisition . The proceeds of the offering were $3 .497 billion, net of the original issuance discount . We also incurred $12 million of issuance costs that are included in Other assets and will be amortized to Interest and debt expense over the term of the debt . In connection with this issuance, we also entered into an interest rate swap transaction related to the $1 .0 billion floating-rate debt due 2013 . Under this swap agreement, we will receive variable payments based on three-month LIBOR rates and pay a fixed rate through May 15, 2013 . Changes in the cash flows of the interest rate swap are expected to exactly offset the changes in cash flows attributable to fluctuations in the three-month LIBOR-based interest payments . We have designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge and record changes in its fair value in AOCI . The net effect of this swap is to convert the $1 .0 billion floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate obligation bearing a rate of 0 .922 percent . At the acquisition date, we assumed $1 .0 billion of outstanding National debt with a fair value of $1 .105 billion . The excess of the fair value over the stated value will be amortized as a reduction of interest and debt expense over the term of the related debt . L A U N N A T R O P E R The following table summarizes the total long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2011: Notes due 2012 at 6 .15% (assumed with National acquisition) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 375 Floating-rate notes due 2013 (swapped to a 0 .922% fixed rate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 Notes due 2013 at 0 .875% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500 Notes due 2014 at 1 .375% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 Notes due 2015 at 3 .95% (assumed with National acquisition) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 Notes due 2016 at 2 .375% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 375 Notes due 2017 at 6 .60% (assumed with National acquisition) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,500 93 Add net unamortized premium (assumed with National acquisition) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (382) Total long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,211 As of December 31, 2010, we had no outstanding debt . Interest incurred on debt and amortization of debt expense was $42 million in 2011 . Interest incurred in 2010 and 2009 was not material . Cash payments for interest on long-term debt were $54 million in 2011 . 14. Commitments and contingencies Operating leases We conduct certain operations in leased facilities and also lease a portion of our data processing and other equipment . In addition, certain long-term supply agreements to purchase industrial gases are accounted for as operating leases . Lease agreements frequently include purchase and renewal provisions and require us to pay taxes, insurance and maintenance costs . Rental and lease expense incurred was $109 million, $100 million and $114 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively . Capitalized software licenses We have licenses for certain internal-use electronic design automation software that we account for as capital leases . The related liabilities are apportioned between Accounts payable and Deferred credits and other liabilities on our Consolidated balance sheets, depending on the contractual timing of the payment . Purchase commitments Some of our purchase commitments entered in the ordinary course of business provide for minimum payments . At December 31, 2011, we had committed to make the following minimum payments under our non-cancellable operating leases, capitalized software licenses and purchase commitments: 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating Leases $102 77 55 48 36 118 Capitalized Software Licenses $73 35 31 12 — — Purchase Commitments $215 97 20 4 2 10 T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 3 1 Indemnification guarantees We routinely sell products with an intellectual property indemnification included in the terms of sale . Historically, we have had only minimal, infrequent losses associated with these indemnities . Consequently, we cannot reasonably estimate or accrue for any future liabilities that may result . R E P O R T A N N U A L Warranty costs/product liabilities We accrue for known product-related claims if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated . During the periods presented, there have been no material accruals or payments regarding product warranty or product liability . Historically, we have experienced a low rate of payments on product claims . Although we cannot predict the likelihood or amount of any future claims, we do not believe they will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity . Consistent with general industry practice, we enter into formal contracts with certain customers that include negotiated warranty remedies . Typically, under these agreements our warranty for semiconductor products includes: three years coverage; an obligation to repair, replace or refund; and a maximum payment obligation tied to the price paid for our products . In some cases, product claims may exceed the price of our products . General We are subject to various legal and administrative proceedings . Although it is not possible to predict the outcome of these matters, we believe that the results of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity . From time to time, we also negotiate contingent consideration payment arrangements associated with certain acquisitions, which are recorded at fair value . Discontinued operations indemnity In connection with the 2006 sale of the former Sensors & Controls (S&C) business, we have agreed to indemnify Sensata Technologies, Inc ., for specified litigation matters and certain liabilities, including environmental liabilities . In a settlement with a third party, we have agreed to indemnify that party for certain events relating to S&C products, which events we consider remote . We believe our total remaining potential exposure from both of these indemnities will not exceed $200 million . As of December 31, 2011, we believe future payments related to these indemnity obligations will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity . 15. Stockholders’ equity We are authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock . No preferred stock is currently outstanding . Treasury shares acquired in connection with the board-authorized stock repurchase program in 2011, 2010 and 2009 were 59,466,168 shares, 93,522,896 shares and 45,544,800 shares, respectively . As of December 31, 2011, $5 .7 billion of stock repurchase authorizations remain, and no expiration date has been specified . 16. Supplemental financial information Other income (expense) net 2011 2010 2009 Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $11 (6) Other (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5 $13 24 $37 $24 2 $26 (a) Includes lease income of approximately $20 million per year, primarily from the purchaser of a former business . As of December 31, 2011, the aggregate amount of non-cancellable future lease payments to be received from these leases is $84 million . These leases contain renewal options . Other also includes miscellaneous non-operational items such as: interest income and expense related to non-investment items such as taxes; gains and losses from our equity method investments; realized gains and losses associated with former equity investments; gains and losses related to former businesses; gains and losses from currency exchange rate changes; and gains and losses from our derivative financial instruments, primarily forward foreign currency exchange contracts . 2011 also includes an expense associated with a settlement related to a divested business . Property, plant and equipment at cost Depreciable Lives (Years) Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildings and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 5-40 3-10 December 31, 2011 2010 $ 188 2,998 3,947 $7,133 $ 92 2,815 4,000 $6,907 3 2 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Authorizations for property, plant and equipment expenditures in future years were $249 million at December 31, 2011 . Accrued expenses and other liabilities Customer incentive programs and allowances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Severance and related expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and other non-income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L A U N N A T R O P E R December 31, 2011 $ 190 140 98 367 $ 795 2010 $ 118 19 108 377 $ 622 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes Unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Postretirement benefit plans: December 31, 2011 2010 (3) $ (13) (704) Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Net prior service credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Cash flow hedge derivative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(776) $(701) (780) 9 (2) 17. Segment and geographic area data Reportable segments Our financial reporting structure comprises three reportable segments . These reportable segments, which are established along major categories of products having unique design and development requirements, are as follows: Analog – Analog semiconductors change real-world signals – such as sound, temperature, pressure or images – by conditioning them, amplifying them and often converting them to a stream of digital data that can be processed by other semiconductors, such as digital signal processors (DSPs) . Analog semiconductors are also used to manage power distribution and consumption . Analog includes the following major product lines: HVAL, Power, HPA and SVA . Embedded Processing – Our Embedded Processing products include our DSPs and microcontrollers . DSPs perform mathematical computations almost instantaneously to process or improve digital data . Microcontrollers are designed to control a set of specific tasks for electronic equipment . We make and sell catalog Embedded Processing products used in many different applications and custom Embedded Processing products used in specific applications, such as communications infrastructure equipment and automotive . Wireless – Growth in the wireless market is being driven by the demand for smartphones, tablet computers and other emerging portable devices . Many of today’s smartphones and tablets use an applications processor to run the device’s software operating system and enable expanded functionality . Many wireless devices also use other semiconductors to enable wireless connectivity using technologies such as Bluetooth®, WiFi networks, GPS, and Near Field Communications . Our OMAP applications processors and connectivity products enable us to take advantage of the increasing demand for more powerful and more functional mobile devices . We design, make and sell products to satisfy each of these requirements . Wireless products are typically sold in high volumes . Our Wireless portfolio includes both catalog products and custom products . Wireless also includes baseband products, which allow a cell phone to connect to the cellular network . We are no longer investing in the development of baseband products, and almost all of our current baseband products are sold to a single customer . Other In addition to our reportable segments, we also have Other . Other includes other operating segments that neither meet the quantitative thresholds for individually reportable segments nor are they aggregated with other operating segments . These operating segments primarily include our smaller semiconductor product lines such as DLP® products (primarily used in projectors to create high-definition images), custom semiconductors known as ASICs, and our handheld graphing and scientific calculators . Other also includes royalties received for our patented technology that we license to other electronics companies and revenue from transitional supply agreements that we may enter into in connection with acquisitions and divestitures . Other may also include certain unallocated income and expenses such as gains and losses on sales of assets; sales tax refunds; and certain litigation costs, settlements or reserves . Except for these few unallocated items, we allocate all of our expenses associated with corporate activities to our operating segments based on specific methodologies, such as percentage of operating expenses or headcount . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 3 3 Acquisition charges related to National are also recorded in Other in 2011, as detailed in Note 2 . The expenses associated with the recognition of fair-value write-up of both inventory and property, plant and equipment are recorded in Other as well . Inventory-related expense was classified in COR as the inventory was sold . The property, plant and equipment-related expense is primarily recognized in COR . Losses associated with the earthquake in Japan and Restructuring charges related to the 2011 announced actions in Hiji, Japan, R E P O R T A N N U A L and Houston, Texas, are also included in Other . See Notes 3 and 4 for additional information . With the exception of goodwill, we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment, nor does the chief operating decision maker evaluate operating segments using discrete asset information . There was no significant intersegment revenue . The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies . Segment information Revenue Analog Embedded Processing Wireless Other Total 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,375 5,979 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,202 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,693 1,876 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 770 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,110 2,073 1,471 $ 368 491 194 $2,518 $2,732 $13,735 13,966 2,936 10,427 2,128 2,978 2,626 $ 412 $ 519 $ 2,992 4,514 1,464 1,991 712 683 315 Geographic area information The following geographic area data include revenue, based on product shipment destination and royalty payor location, and property, plant and equipment, based on physical location: U.S. Asia Europe Japan Rest of World Total Revenue 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,468 $8,619 $1,822 $1,462 1,366 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,760 1,408 8,903 6,575 1,539 1,140 Property, plant and equipment, net 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,159 $1,739 $ 276 $ 228 249 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,575 1,013 1,694 1,727 139 161 $364 398 328 $ 26 23 13 $13,735 13,966 10,427 $ 4,428 3,680 3,158 Major customer Sales to the Nokia group of companies, including sales to indirect contract manufacturers, accounted for 13 percent, 19 percent and 24 percent of our 2011, 2010 and 2009 revenue, respectively . Revenue from sales to Nokia is reflected primarily in our Wireless segment . 3 4 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Report of independent registered public accounting firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders Texas Instruments Incorporated L A U N N A T R O P E R We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Texas Instruments Incorporated and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 . These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management . Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits . We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) . Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement . An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements . An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation . We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion . In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Texas Instruments Incorporated and subsidiaries at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with U .S . generally accepted accounting principles . We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 24, 2012, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon . Dallas, Texas February 24, 2012 T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 3 5 R E P O R T A N N U A L Report by management on internal control over financial reporting The management of TI is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting . TI’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements issued for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles . All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements . Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate . TI management assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 . In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework . We acquired National Semiconductor Corporation (National) on September 23, 2011 . We excluded from our assessment the internal control over financial reporting of National . National’s results since the acquisition date are included in the December 31, 2011, consolidated financial statements of TI and constituted approximately 4 percent and 5 percent of total assets and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2011, and approximately 2 percent of revenue for the year then ended . See Note 2 to the financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for a discussion of this acquisition . Based on our assessment we believe that, as of December 31, 2011, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on the COSO criteria . TI’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, which immediately follows this report . 3 6 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Report of independent registered public accounting firm on internal control over financial reporting The Board of Directors and Stockholders Texas Instruments Incorporated L A U N N A T R O P E R We have audited Texas Instruments Incorporated’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria) . Texas Instruments Incorporated’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report by management on internal control over financial reporting . Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit . We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) . Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects . Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances . We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion . A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles . A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements . Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements . Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate . As indicated in the accompanying Report by management on internal control over financial reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting excluded the internal controls of National Semiconductor Corporation, which is included in the December 31, 2011, consolidated financial statements of Texas Instruments Incorporated and constituted approximately 4 percent and 5 percent of total and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2011, and approximately 2 percent of revenue for the year then ended . Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Texas Instruments Incorporated also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of National Semiconductor Corporation . In our opinion, Texas Instruments Incorporated maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the COSO criteria . We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Texas Instruments Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, and our report dated February 24, 2012, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon . Dallas, Texas February 24, 2012 T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 3 7 R E P O R T A N N U A L Summary of selected financial data [Millions of dollars, except share and per-share amounts] Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Operating costs and expenses (a) (b) (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income (expense) net (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Basic income from continuing operations per common share . . . $ Diluted income from continuing operations per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Dividends declared per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Average dilutive potential common shares outstanding For Years Ended December 31, 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 13,735 $ 10,743 2,992 (37) 2,955 719 2,236 — 2,236 $ 1.91 $ 13,966 $ 9,452 4,514 37 4,551 1,323 3,228 — 3,228 $ 2 .66 $ 10,427 $ 8,436 1,991 26 2,017 547 1,470 — 1,470 $ 1 .16 $ 12,501 $ 10,064 2,437 44 2,481 561 1,920 — 1,920 $ 1 .46 $ 13,835 10,338 3,497 195 3,692 1,051 2,641 16 2,657 1 .86 1.88 $ 0.56 $ 2 .62 $ 0 .49 $ 1 .15 $ 0 .45 $ 1 .44 $ 0 .41 $ 1 .82 0 .30 during year, in thousands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,171,364 1,212,940 1,268,533 1,321,250 1,444,163 (a) In 2011, we acquired National and incurred acquisition-related charges of $426 million . (b) Includes Restructuring charges of $112 million, $33 million, $212 million, $254 million and $52 million in 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively . (c) Includes gains from the divestiture of product lines of $144 million in 2010 and $39 million in 2007 . (d) Includes Interest and debt expense of $42 million in 2011 . 2011 2010 December 31, 2009 2008 2007 Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,329 $ 5,079 $ 4,527 $ 4,258 $ 4,893 3,609 Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,667 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,975 Stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,680 13,401 — 10,437 3,158 12,119 — 9,722 3,304 11,923 — 9,326 4,428 20,497 4,211 10,952 Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stockholders of record . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,759 19,733 28,412 20,525 26,584 24,190 29,537 25,107 30,175 26,037 Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,256 Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 816 Dividends declared and paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 644 Stock repurchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,973 $ 3,820 1,199 592 2,454 $ 2,643 753 567 954 $ 3,330 763 537 2,122 See Notes to financial statements and Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation . 2011 For Years Ended December 31, 2008 2009 2010 2007 $ 4,407 686 425 4,886 3 8 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations The following should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this document . All dollar amounts in the tables in this discussion are stated in millions of U .S . dollars, except per-share amounts . L A U N N A T R O P E R Overview We design and make semiconductors that we sell to electronics designers and manufacturers all over the world . We began operations in 1930 . We are incorporated in Delaware, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, and have design, manufacturing or sales operations in more than 35 countries . We have four segments: Analog, Embedded Processing, Wireless and Other . We expect Analog and Embedded Processing to be our primary growth engines in the years ahead, and we therefore focus our resources on these segments . We were the world’s fourth largest semiconductor company in 2011 as measured by revenue, according to preliminary estimates from an external source . Additionally, we sell calculators and related products . On September 23, 2011, we completed the acquisition of National Semiconductor Corporation (National) . The acquisition has brought to TI a portfolio of thousands of analog products, strong customer design tools and additional manufacturing capacity, and is consistent with our strategy to grow our Analog business . The results of National’s operations from the acquisition date are included in our Analog segment under the name Silicon Valley Analog . Product information Semiconductors are electronic components that serve as the building blocks inside modern electronic systems and equipment . Semiconductors come in two basic forms: individual transistors and integrated circuits (generally known as “chips”) that combine multiple transistors on a single piece of material to form a complete electronic circuit . Our products, more than 80,000 in number, are integrated circuits that are used to accomplish many different things, such as converting and amplifying signals, interfacing with other devices, managing and distributing power, processing data, canceling noise and improving signal resolution . This broad portfolio includes products that are integral to almost all electronic equipment . We sell custom and catalog semiconductor products . Custom products are designed for a specific customer for a specific application, are sold only to that customer and are typically sold directly to the customer . The life cycles of custom products are generally determined by end-equipment upgrade cycles and can be as short as 12 to 24 months . Catalog products are designed for use by many customers and/or many applications and are generally sold through both distribution and direct channels . They include both proprietary and commodity products . The life cycles of catalog products are generally longer than for custom products . Additional information regarding each segment’s products follows . Analog Analog semiconductors change real-world signals – such as sound, temperature, pressure or images – by conditioning them, amplifying them and often converting them to a stream of digital data that can be processed by other semiconductors, such as digital signal processors (DSPs) . Analog semiconductors are also used to manage power distribution and consumption . Sales to our Analog segment’s more than 90,000 customers generated about 47 percent of our revenue in 2011 . According to external sources, the worldwide market for analog semiconductors was about $43 billion in 2011 . Our Analog segment’s revenue in 2011 was about $6 .5 billion, or about 15 percent of this fragmented market, the leading position . We believe that we are well positioned to increase our market share over time . Our Analog segment includes the following major product lines: High Volume Analog & Logic (HVAL), Power Management (Power), High Performance Analog (HPA) and Silicon Valley Analog (SVA) . HVAL products: These include both high-volume analog products and logic and standard linear products . High-volume analog includes products for specific applications, including custom products . The life cycles of our high-volume analog products are generally shorter than most of our other Analog product lines . End markets for high-volume analog products include communications, automotive, computing and many consumer electronics products . Logic and standard linear includes commodity products marketed to many different customers for many different applications . Power products: These include both catalog and custom semiconductors that help customers manage power in any type of electronic system . We design and manufacture power management semiconductors for both portable devices (battery-powered devices, such as handheld consumer electronics, laptop computers and cordless power tools) and line-powered systems (products that require an external electrical source, such as computers, digital TVs, wireless basestations and high-voltage industrial equipment) . HPA products: These include catalog analog semiconductors, such as amplifiers, data converters and interface semiconductors, that we market to many different customers who use them in manufacturing a wide range of products sold in many end markets, including the industrial, communications, computing and consumer electronics markets . HPA products generally have long life cycles, often more than 10 years . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 3 9 SVA products: These include catalog analog products, particularly in the areas of power management, data converters, interface and operational amplifiers, nearly all of which are complementary to our other Analog products . This portfolio of thousands of products is marketed to many different customers who use them in manufacturing a wide range of products sold in many end markets . Many SVA products have long life cycles, often more than 10 years . R E P O R T A N N U A L Embedded Processing Our Embedded Processing products include our DSPs and microcontrollers . DSPs perform mathematical computations almost instantaneously to process or improve digital data . Microcontrollers are designed to control a set of specific tasks for electronic equipment . Sales of Embedded Processing products generated about 15 percent of our revenue in 2011 . According to external sources, the worldwide market for embedded processors was about $18 billion in 2011 . Our Embedded Processing segment’s revenue in 2011 was about $2 .0 billion, or about 12 percent of this fragmented market . We believe we are well positioned to increase our market share over time . An important characteristic of our Embedded Processing products is that our customers often invest their own research and development (R&D) to write software that operates on our products . This investment tends to increase the length of our customer relationships because customers prefer to re-use software from one product generation to the next . We make and sell catalog Embedded Processing products used in many different applications and custom Embedded Processing products used in specific applications, such as communications infrastructure equipment and automotive . Wireless Growth in the wireless market is being driven by the demand for smartphones, tablet computers and other emerging portable devices . Many of today’s smartphones and tablets use an applications processor to run the device’s software operating system and to enable the expanding functionality that has made smartphones and tablets the fastest growing wireless market segments . Many wireless devices also use other semiconductors to enable wireless connectivity using technologies such as Bluetooth®, WiFi networks, GPS and Near Field Communications . We design, make and sell products to satisfy each of these requirements . Wireless products are typically sold in high volumes . Our Wireless portfolio includes both catalog products and custom products . Sales of Wireless products generated about $2 .5 billion, or about 18 percent of our revenue, in 2011, with a majority of those sales to a single customer . Our Wireless investments are concentrated on our OMAP™ applications processors and our connectivity products, areas we believe offer significant growth opportunities and which will enable us to take advantage of the increasing demand for more powerful and more functional wireless devices . We no longer invest in development of baseband products (products that allow a cell phone to connect to the cellular network), an area we believe offers far less promising growth prospects . Almost all of our baseband products are sold to a single customer . We expect substantially all of our baseband revenue, which was $1 .1 billion in 2011, to cease by the end of 2012 . Other Our Other segment includes revenue from our smaller semiconductor product lines and from sales of our handheld graphing and scientific calculators . It also includes royalties received for our patented technology that we license to other electronics companies and revenue from transitional supply agreements that we may enter into in connection with acquisitions and divestitures . The semiconductor products in our Other segment include DLP® products (primarily used in projectors to create high-definition images) and custom semiconductors known as application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) . This segment generated about $2 .5 billion, or about 20 percent of our revenue, in 2011 . We also include in our Other segment certain acquisition-related charges that are not used in evaluating results and allocating resources to our segments . These charges include certain fair-value adjustments, restructuring charges, transaction expenses, acquisition-related retention bonuses and the amortization of intangible assets . Inventory Our inventory practices differ by product, but we generally maintain inventory levels that are consistent with our expectations of customer demand . Because of the longer product life cycles of catalog products and their inherently lower risk of obsolescence, we generally carry more of those products than custom products . Additionally, we sometimes maintain catalog-product inventory in unfinished wafer form, as well as higher finished goods inventory of low-volume products, allowing greater flexibility in periods of high demand . We also have consignment inventory programs in place for our largest customers and some distributors . Manufacturing Semiconductor manufacturing begins with a sequence of photo-lithographic and chemical processing steps that fabricate a number of semiconductor devices on a thin silicon wafer . Each device on the wafer is tested and the wafer is cut into pieces called chips . Each chip is assembled into a package that then is usually retested . The entire process typically requires between 12 and 18 weeks and takes place in highly specialized facilities . 4 0 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S We own and operate semiconductor manufacturing facilities in North America, Asia and Europe . These include both high-volume wafer fabrication and assembly/test facilities . Our facilities require substantial investment to construct and are largely fixed-cost assets once in operation . Because we own much of our manufacturing capacity, a significant portion of our operating cost is fixed . In general, these fixed costs do not decline with reductions in customer demand or utilization of capacity, potentially hurting our profit margins . Conversely, as product demand rises and factory utilization increases, the fixed costs are spread over increased output, potentially benefiting our profit margins . L A U N N A T R O P E R The cost and lifespan of the equipment and processes we use to manufacture semiconductors vary by product . Our Analog products and most of our Embedded Processing products can be manufactured using older, less expensive equipment than is needed for manufacturing advanced logic products, such as our Wireless products . Advanced logic wafer manufacturing continually requires new and expensive processes and equipment . In contrast, the processes and equipment required for manufacturing our Analog products and most of our Embedded Processing products do not have this requirement . To supplement our internal wafer fabrication capacity and maximize our responsiveness to customer demand and return on capital, our wafer manufacturing strategy utilizes the capacity of outside suppliers, commonly known as foundries . We source about 25 percent of our wafers from external foundries, with the vast majority of this outsourcing being for advanced logic wafers . In 2011, external foundries provided about 75 percent of the fabricated wafers for our advanced logic manufacturing needs . We expect the proportion of our advanced logic wafers provided by foundries will increase over time . We expect to maintain sufficient internal wafer fabrication capacity to meet the vast majority of our analog production needs . In addition to using foundries to supplement our wafer fabrication capacity, we selectively use subcontractors to supplement our assembly/test capacity . We generally use subcontractors for assembly/test of products that would be less cost-efficient to complete in-house (e .g ., relatively low-volume products that are unlikely to keep internal equipment fully utilized), or when demand temporarily exceeds our internal capacity . We believe we often have a cost advantage from maintaining internal assembly/test capacity . Our internal/external manufacturing strategy reduces the level of our required capital expenditures, and thereby reduces our subsequent levels of depreciation below what it would be if we sourced all manufacturing internally . Consequently, we experience less fluctuation in our profit margins due to changing product demand, and lower cash requirements for expanding and updating our manufacturing capabilities . Product cycle The global semiconductor market is characterized by constant, though generally incremental, advances in product designs and manufacturing processes . Semiconductor prices and manufacturing costs tend to decline over time as manufacturing processes and product life cycles mature . Typically, new chips are produced in limited quantities at first and then ramp to high-volume production over time . Consequently, new products tend not to have a significant revenue impact for one or more quarters after their introduction . In the results discussions below, changes in our shipments are caused by changing demand for our products unless otherwise noted . Market cycle The “semiconductor cycle” is an important concept that refers to the ebb and flow of supply . The semiconductor market historically has been characterized by periods of tight supply caused by strengthening demand and/or insufficient manufacturing capacity, followed by periods of surplus inventory caused by weakening demand and/or excess manufacturing capacity . This cycle is affected by the significant time and money required to build and maintain semiconductor manufacturing facilities . Seasonality Our revenue and operating results are subject to some seasonal variation . Our semiconductor sales generally are seasonally weaker in the first quarter than in other quarters, particularly for products sold into cell phones and other consumer electronics devices, which have stronger sales later in the year as manufacturers prepare for the major holiday selling seasons . Calculator revenue is tied to the U .S . back-to-school season and is therefore at its highest in the second and third quarters . Tax considerations We operate in a number of tax jurisdictions and are subject to several types of taxes including those that are based on income, capital, property and payroll, as well as sales and other transactional taxes . The timing of the final determination of our tax liabilities varies by jurisdiction and taxing authority . As a result, during any particular reporting period we might reflect in our financial statements one or more tax refunds or assessments, or changes to tax liabilities, involving one or more taxing authorities . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 4 1 Results of operations R E P O R T A N N U A L 2011 compared with 2010 Our 2011 revenue was $13 .73 billion, net income was $2 .24 billion and earnings per share (EPS) were $1 .88 . In 2011, we made solid progress in strengthening our core businesses of Analog, Embedded Processing and Wireless . Although the year started strong, global economic uncertainty and the earthquake in Japan impacted TI, our customers and our suppliers . Despite these challenges, we successfully completed the acquisition of National, we gained share in the Analog and Embedded Processing markets, and we had solid revenue growth from our OMAP products . We also continued to wind down our baseband operations . As a result, we left the year with a sharpened focus on our core businesses . Despite the semiconductor downturn that began in the third quarter, we left the year seeing higher-than-expected revenue increases across all our major product lines . Revenue by segment: Analog . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Embedded Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wireless . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of revenue (COR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Research and development (R&D) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition charges/divestiture (gain) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income (expense) net (OI&E) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest and debt expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted income per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . For Years Ended December 31, 2010 $ 5,979 2,073 2,978 2,936 13,966 6,474 7,492 1,570 1,519 33 (144) 4,514 37 — 4,551 1,323 $ 3,228 2 .62 $ 2009 $ 4,202 1,471 2,626 2,128 10,427 5,428 4,999 1,476 1,320 212 — 1,991 26 — 2,017 547 $ 1,470 1 .15 $ 2011 $ 6,375 2,110 2,518 2,732 13,735 6,963 6,772 1,715 1,638 112 315 2,992 5 42 2,955 719 $ 2,236 1.88 $ Percentage of revenue: Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R&D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SG&A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49.3% 12.5% 11.9% 21.8% 53 .6% 11 .2% 10 .9% 32 .3% 47 .9% 14 .2% 12 .6% 19 .1% As required by accounting rule ASC 260, net income allocated to unvested restricted stock units (RSUs), on which TI pays dividend equivalents, is excluded from the calculation of EPS . The amount excluded from earnings per common share was $34 million, $44 million and $14 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively . Impact of National acquisition We completed our acquisition of National on September 23, 2011 . We recorded the assets acquired and liabilities assumed measured at fair value as of that date . The total consideration transferred for the acquisition was $6 .56 billion and the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed after adjustments in the fourth quarter of 2011 was $3 .03 billion, resulting in goodwill of $3 .53 billion . The results of National’s operations from the acquisition date are included in the Analog segment under SVA . See Note 2 to the financial statements for more details regarding the acquisition . 4 2 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S As a direct result of the National acquisition, we incurred various incremental costs that we recorded in our Other segment . The total acquisition-related charges are as follows: For Year Ended December 31, 2011 Inventory related . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment related . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . As recorded in COR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Severance and other benefits: Change of control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Announced employment reductions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transaction costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retention bonuses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . As recorded in Acquisition charges/divestiture (gain) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total acquisition-related charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 96 15 111 87 41 29 50 48 46 14 315 $ 426 L A U N N A T R O P E R We recognized costs associated with the adjustments to write up the value of acquired inventory and property, plant and equipment to fair value as of the acquisition date . These fair-value adjustments will have an impact on future operating results . The costs shown above are in addition to the normal expensing of the acquired assets based on their carrying or book value prior to the acquisition . These additional costs are separately identifiable from the ongoing operating results of SVA that are included in the Analog segment, so we have classified them as a part of our Other segment . This presentation is consistent with how management measures the performance of those segments . The total fair-value write-up for the acquired inventory was expensed as that inventory was sold . The total fair-value write-up for the acquired property, plant and equipment was $436 million, which is being depreciated at a rate of about $15 million per quarter beginning in the fourth quarter of 2011, and will be recognized in COR . See Note 2 to the financial statements for more details regarding these acquisition-related charges . Total acquisition-related charges are expected to be about $170 million for the first quarter of 2012 (about $20 million of which will be recorded in COR and the balance in Acquisition charges/divestiture (gain)) then drop to about $110 million in the second quarter of 2012 . These charges will then continue to decline by about $10 million per quarter until they reach about $80 million, which is the ongoing amortization of intangibles amount that will continue for 8 to 10 years . Impact of restructuring Also recognized in the fourth quarter of 2011 are restructuring charges associated with our recently announced plans to close two older semiconductor manufacturing facilities in Hiji, Japan, and Houston, Texas, over the next 18 months . Combined, these facilities supported about 4 percent of TI’s revenue in 2011, and each employs about 500 people . As needed, production from these facilities will be moved to other more advanced TI factories . The total charge for these closures is estimated at $215 million, of which $112 million was recognized in the fourth quarter and the remainder will be incurred over the next seven quarters . The restructuring charges recognized in the fourth quarter of 2011 are included in our Other segment and consist of $107 million for severance and benefit costs and $5 million of accelerated depreciation of the facilities’ assets . Of the estimated $215 million total cost, about $135 million will be for severance and related benefits, about $30 million will be for accelerated depreciation of facility assets and about $50 million will be for other exit costs . Annual savings will be about $100 million once this action is complete . See Note 4 to the financial statements for more details . Details of 2011 financial results Revenue in 2011 was $13 .73 billion, down $231 million, or 2 percent, from 2010 due to lower revenue from Wireless baseband products . Revenue from our core businesses was higher primarily due to the inclusion of results from SVA, and to a lesser extent, increased revenue from OMAP applications processors . Gross profit in 2011 was $6 .77 billion, a decrease of $720 million, or 10 percent, from 2010 . This decrease was primarily due to a combination of, in decreasing order, lower revenue, lower average levels of factory utilization as we reduced production in response to weaker demand, acquisition-related charges reflected in COR and inventory charges . Lower factory utilization decreased our gross profit by $175 million from the year-ago period . Gross profit margin was 49 .3 percent of revenue compared with 53 .6 percent in 2010 . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 4 3 R E P O R T A N N U A L Operating expenses were $1 .72 billion for R&D and $1 .64 billion for SG&A . R&D expense increased $145 million, or 9 percent, from 2010 due to the addition of SVA and higher product development costs in our other major Analog product lines, Embedded Processing and Wireless . R&D expense as a percent of revenue was 12 .5 percent compared with 11 .2 percent in the year-ago period . SG&A expense increased $119 million, or 8 percent, from 2010 primarily due to the addition of SVA, and to a lesser extent, higher investments in sales and marketing in support of our other major Analog product lines, Embedded Processing and Wireless . SG&A expense as a percent of revenue was 11 .9 percent compared with 10 .9 percent in the year-ago period . As mentioned above, restructuring charges for 2011 were associated with actions initiated for facilities in Texas and Japan . Restructuring charges for 2010 were associated with actions taken in 2009 and represent pension benefit settlements as terminated employees took those benefits in the form of lump-sum payments . Compared with acquisition charges of $315 million in 2011, in 2010 we recognized a gain of $144 million from the divestiture of a product line previously included in our Other segment . Operating profit was $2 .99 billion, or 21 .8 percent of revenue, compared with $4 .51 billion, or 32 .3 percent of revenue, in 2010 . This decrease was due to, in decreasing order, lower gross profit, higher total acquisition-related charges, higher operating expenses and a gain on the divestiture of a product line in 2010 . OI&E for 2011 was income of $5 million . This was $32 million lower than in 2010 due to an expense in 2011 associated with a settlement related to a divested business . Interest and debt expense was $42 million . This includes interest and amortization of debt expense associated with our issuance of new debt in 2011 and the assumption of debt as a result of our acquisition of National . See Note 13 to the financial statements for details regarding debt outstanding . The tax provision for 2011 was $719 million compared with $1 .32 billion for the prior year . The decrease was primarily due to lower income before income taxes . See Note 7 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of tax rates to the statutory federal tax rate . Net income was $2 .24 billion, a decrease of $992 million from 2010 . EPS for 2011 was $1 .88 compared with $2 .62 for 2010 . EPS benefited $0 .07 from 2010 due to a lower number of average shares outstanding as a result of our stock repurchase program . Orders were $13 .12 billion, a decrease of 6 percent compared with 2010 . The decrease reflected lower demand across a broad range of products . Segment results A detailed discussion of our segment results appears below . Analog Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,375 1,693 26.6% $ — $ 5,979 1,876 31 .4% 13 $ 2011 2010 * Included in operating profit 2011 vs. 2010 7% -10% Analog revenue increased $396 million, or 7 percent, from 2010 primarily due to the inclusion of SVA results, and to a lesser extent, increased shipments of Power Management and High Volume Analog & Logic products . Partially offsetting these increases was lower revenue from High Performance Analog due to normal price declines . Operating profit was $1 .69 billion, or 26 .6 percent of revenue . This was a decrease of $183 million, or 10 percent, compared with 2010 due to higher operating expenses from the inclusion of SVA and, to a lesser extent, lower gross profit resulting from lower factory utilization . Embedded Processing Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,110 368 17.4% $ — $ 2,073 491 23 .7% 6 $ 2011 2010 2011 vs. 2010 2% -25% * Included in operating profit Embedded Processing revenue increased $37 million, or 2 percent, compared with 2010 due to increased shipments of products sold into automotive and communications infrastructure applications . Partially offsetting these increases was lower revenue from catalog products resulting from a decreased proportion of shipments of higher-priced catalog products . 4 4 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Operating profit was $368 million, or 17 .4 percent of revenue . This was a decrease of $123 million, or 25 percent, compared with 2010 primarily due to lower gross profit, and to a lesser extent, higher operating expenses . Lower gross profit was primarily due to lower factory utilization and the effect of the mix of products, which contributed about equally to the change . Wireless L A U N N A T R O P E R Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * Included in operating profit 2011 $ 2,518 412 2010 $2,978 683 2011 vs. 2010 -15% -40% 16.4% 22 .9% $ — 10 $ Wireless revenue decreased $460 million, or 15 percent, from 2010 due to decreased shipments of baseband products, and to a much lesser extent, connectivity products . Partially offsetting these decreases was growth in revenue from OMAP applications processors due to an increased proportion of shipments of higher-priced products . Baseband revenue for 2011 was $1 .10 billion, a decrease of $609 million, or 36 percent, compared with 2010 . We expect baseband quarterly revenue to decline from the fourth quarter level of $279 million and range between $50 million and $100 million per quarter during 2012 . Operating profit was $412 million, or 16 .4 percent of revenue . This was a decrease of $271 million, or 40 percent, compared with 2010 primarily due to lower revenue and associated gross profit . Other Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition charges/divestiture (gain)* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * Included in operating profit 2011 $ 2,732 519 2010 $2,936 1,464 2011 vs. 2010 -7% -65% 19.0% 49 .9% $ 112 315 4 (144) $ Revenue from Other was $2 .73 billion in 2011 . This was a decrease of $204 million, or 7 percent, from 2010 primarily due to decreased shipments across most areas . Operating profit for 2011 from Other was $519 million, or 19 .0 percent of revenue . This was a decrease of $945 million, or 65 percent, compared with 2010 due to charges associated with the National acquisition; the absence of a gain on divestiture; lower revenue and associated gross profit; restructuring charges related to actions to begin in 2012; and the net losses associated with the Japan earthquake . See Note 3 to the financial statements for a detailed discussion regarding the impact of the Japan earthquake . Prior results of operations 2010 compared with 2009 Our 2010 revenue was $13 .97 billion, net income was $3 .23 billion and EPS was $2 .62 . 2010 was an important year in the transformation of TI to a company focused on Analog and Embedded Processing . We saw strong revenue growth of 34 percent led by those businesses as well as the part of our Wireless segment that is focused on smartphones and tablet computers . Each of these businesses grew more than 40 percent and gained significant market share . Success in these businesses let us again return cash to shareholders by repurchasing $2 .45 billion of our stock and paying dividends of nearly $600 million . In 2010, we continued to expand our analog manufacturing capacity through the acquisitions of wafer fabrication facilities in Japan and China, and the purchase and installation of analog wafer manufacturing equipment . These manufacturing assets were purchased at very cost-effective pricing such that the impact to depreciation will be minimal . In total, the equipment and factories purchased at discounted prices since late 2009 will support more than $5 billion of total additional revenue once fully operational . Details of 2010 financial results Revenue in 2010 was $13 .97 billion, up $3 .54 billion, or 34 percent, from 2009 . Revenue in all segments increased compared with 2009, with particular strength in our core businesses, due to increased shipments across a broad range of products . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 4 5 R E P O R T A N N U A L Gross profit was $7 .49 billion, an increase of $2 .49 billion, or 50 percent, from 2009 . This increase was primarily due to higher revenue, and to a lesser extent, the impact of improved factory utilization . Improved factory utilization increased our gross profit by $291 million from 2009 . Gross profit margin was 53 .6 percent of revenue compared with 47 .9 percent in 2009 . Operating expenses were $1 .57 billion for R&D and $1 .52 billion for SG&A . R&D expense increased $94 million, or 6 percent, from 2009 due to higher compensation-related costs . R&D expense as a percent of revenue was 11 .2 percent compared with 14 .2 percent in 2009 . R&D expense increased in the core businesses . SG&A expense increased $199 million, or 15 percent, from 2009 primarily due to higher compensation-related costs, and to a lesser extent, higher sales and marketing costs . SG&A expense as a percent of revenue was 10 .9 percent compared with 12 .6 percent in 2009 . Restructuring charges were $33 million compared with $212 million in 2009 . In 2010, we recognized a gain of $144 million from the sale of a product line previously included in our Other segment . Operating profit was $4 .51 billion, or 32 .3 percent of revenue, compared with $1 .99 billion, or 19 .1 percent of revenue, in 2009 . This increase was due to the increase in revenue and the associated gross profit . Operating profit increased from 2009 in all segments . The tax provision for 2010 was $1 .32 billion compared with $547 million for the prior year . The increase was due to higher income before income taxes . In December 2010, the President signed into law the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010, which reinstated the federal research tax credit with effect retroactively to January 1, 2010 . The effect of the reinstatement of this tax credit was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2010 . Net income was $3 .23 billion, an increase of $1 .76 billion from 2009 . EPS for 2010 was $2 .62 compared with $1 .15 for 2009 . EPS benefited $0 .12 from a lower number of average shares outstanding as a result of our stock repurchase program . Orders were $13 .93 billion, an increase of 23 percent compared with 2009 . The increase reflected higher demand across a broad range of products . Segment results A detailed discussion of our segment results appears below . Analog Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,979 1,876 31.4% 13 $ $4,202 770 18 .3% 84 $ 2010 2009 2010 vs. 2009 42% 144% * Included in operating profit Analog revenue increased $1 .78 billion, or 42 percent, from 2009 due to increased shipments of, in decreasing order, High Volume Analog & Logic, Power Management and High Performance Analog products . Operating profit was $1 .88 billion, or 31 .4 percent of revenue . This was an increase of $1 .11 billion, or 144 percent, compared with 2009 due to higher revenue and associated gross profit . Embedded Processing 2010 2009 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * Included in operating profit $1,471 194 $2,073 491 23.7% 13 .2% $ 43 6 $ 2010 vs. 2009 41% 153% Embedded Processing revenue increased $602 million, or 41 percent, compared with 2009 primarily due to increased shipments of catalog products, and to a lesser extent, products sold into communications infrastructure and automotive applications . Operating profit was $491 million, or 23 .7 percent of revenue . This was an increase of $297 million, or 153 percent, compared with 2009 due to higher revenue and associated gross profit . 4 6 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Wireless Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * Included in operating profit 2010 2009 2010 vs. 2009 $2,978 683 22.9% 12 .0% $2,626 315 13% 117% $ 10 $ 62 L A U N N A T R O P E R Wireless revenue increased $352 million, or 13 percent, from 2009 primarily due to increased shipments of connectivity products, and to a lesser extent, OMAP applications processors . Baseband revenue for 2010 was $1 .71 billion, about even compared with 2009 . Operating profit was $683 million, or 22 .9 percent of revenue . This was an increase of $368 million, or 117 percent, compared with 2009 primarily due to higher revenue and associated gross profit . Other 2010 2009 2010 vs. 2009 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,936 Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,464 49.9% 33 .5% Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Restructuring charges* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Acquisition charges/divestiture (gain)* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,128 712 4 (144 ) 23 — 38% 106% * Included in operating profit Revenue from Other was $2 .94 billion in 2010 . This was an increase of $808 million, or 38 percent, from 2009 primarily due to increased shipments of DLP products and, to a lesser extent, custom ASIC products . Also contributing to the increase in revenue were higher royalties, and revenue from transitional supply agreements associated with recently acquired factories and from increased shipments of calculators . Operating profit for 2010 from Other was $1 .46 billion, or 49 .9 percent of revenue . This was an increase of $752 million, or 106 percent, compared with 2009 due to higher revenue and associated gross profit and, to a lesser extent, the gain on the sale of a product line . Financial condition At the end of 2011, total cash (Cash and cash equivalents plus Short-term investments) was $2 .94 billion, a decrease of $137 million from the end of 2010 . Accounts receivable were $1 .55 billion at the end of 2011 . This was an increase of $27 million compared with the end of 2010 . Days sales outstanding were 41 at the end of 2011 compared with 39 at the end of 2010 . The increase in accounts receivable was due to higher revenue in December 2011 than in December 2010 . Inventory was $1 .79 billion at the end of 2011 . This was an increase of $268 million from the end of 2010 . Days of inventory at the end of 2011 were 86 compared with 83 at the end of 2010 . The increase in inventory was primarily due to rebuilding inventory to support higher customer service levels with shorter lead times, as well as inventory associated with the National acquisition . Liquidity and capital resources Our primary source of liquidity is cash flow from operations . Additional sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and revolving credit facilities . Cash flow from operations for 2011 was $3 .26 billion, a decrease of $564 million from the prior year due to lower net income . We had $992 million of cash and cash equivalents and $1 .94 billion of short-term investments as of December 31, 2011 . We have a variable-rate revolving credit facility that allows us to borrow up to $920 million until August 2012 . We have a second variable-rate revolving credit facility that allows us to borrow an additional $1 billion until July 2012 . We intend to replace these credit facilities in 2012 . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 4 7 R E P O R T A N N U A L In 2011, investing activities used $5 .43 billion primarily for the National acquisition, net of cash acquired . See Notes 2 and 10 to the financial statements for details regarding acquisitions . In comparison, in 2010 we used $199 million for acquisitions that included wafer fabrication facilities and related equipment . For 2011, capital expenditures were $816 million compared with $1 .20 billion in 2010 . Capital expenditures in 2011 were primarily for assembly/test equipment and analog wafer manufacturing equipment . For 2011, financing activities provided net cash of $2 .59 billion compared with cash used in financing activities of $2 .63 billion in 2010 . For 2011, we received proceeds of $3 .50 billion from the issuance in May of fixed- and variable-rate long-term debt (net of the original issuance discount) and a net $1 billion from the issuance of commercial paper . The long-term debt was used in the National acquisition and the commercial paper was issued for general corporate purposes and to maintain cash balances at desired levels . In conjunction with the issuance of long-term debt, we also entered into an interest rate swap that effectively fixes the interest rate on the long-term variable-rate debt . See Note 13 to the financial statements for additional details . We used $1 .97 billion to repurchase 59 million shares of our common stock in 2011, compared with $2 .45 billion used to repurchase 94 million shares in 2010 . Dividends paid in 2011 of $644 million, compared with $592 million in 2010, reflect an increase in the dividend rate partially offset by the lower number of shares outstanding . On September 15, 2011, we announced a 31 percent increase in our quarterly cash dividend rate . The quarterly dividend increased from $0 .13 to $0 .17 per share, resulting in annual dividend payments of $0 .68 per share . Employee exercises of TI stock options are also reflected in cash from financing activities . In 2011, these exercises provided cash proceeds of $690 million compared with $407 million in 2010 . We believe we have the necessary financial resources and operating plans to fund our working capital needs, capital expenditures, dividend payments and other business requirements for at least the next 12 months . Long-term contractual obligations Contractual obligations Payments Due by Period 2012 2013/2014 2015/2016 Thereafter Total Long-term debt obligations (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $375 Operating lease obligations (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 Software license obligations (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Purchase obligations (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215 Deferred compensation plan (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Total (f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $799 $2,500 132 66 117 27 $2,842 $1,250 84 12 6 22 $1,374 $ 375 118 — 10 67 $ 570 $4,500 436 151 348 150 $5,585 (a) Long-term debt obligations represent principal payments and include amounts classified as current portion of long-term debt . The related interest payments are not included . See Note 13 to the financial statements for additional information . (b) Includes minimum payments for leased facilities and equipment, as well as purchase of industrial gases under contracts accounted for as an operating lease . (c) Includes payments under license agreements for electronic design automation software . (d) Includes contractual arrangements with suppliers where there is a fixed non-cancellable payment schedule or minimum payments due with a reduced delivery schedule . Excluded from the table are cancellable arrangements . However, depending on when certain purchase arrangements may be cancelled, an additional $5 million of cancellation penalties may be required to be paid, which are not reflected in the table . (e) Includes an estimate of payments under this plan for the liability that existed at December 31, 2011 . (f) The table excludes $210 million of uncertain tax liabilities under ASC 740, as well as any planned, future funding contributions to retirement benefit plans . Amounts associated with uncertain tax liabilities have been excluded because of the difficulty in making reasonably reliable estimates of the timing of cash settlements with the respective taxing authorities . In connection with retirement benefit obligations, we plan to make funding contributions to our retirement benefit plans of about $120 million in 2012, but funding projections beyond 2012 are not practical to estimate due to the rules affecting tax-deductible contributions and the impact of the plans’ asset performance, interest rates and potential U .S . and non-U .S . legislation . 4 8 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S L A U N N A T R O P E R Critical accounting policies In preparing our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we use statistical analyses, estimates and projections that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures and may vary from actual results . We consider the following accounting policies to be both those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and that require the most subjective judgment . If actual results differ significantly from management’s estimates and projections, there could be a significant effect on our financial statements . Revenue recognition Revenue from sales of our products, including sales to our distributors, is recognized upon shipment or delivery, depending upon the terms of the sales order, provided that persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists, title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer, the sales amounts are fixed or determinable, and collection of the revenue is reasonably assured . Revenue from sales of our products that are subject to inventory consignment agreements is recognized when the customer or distributor pulls product from consignment inventory that we store at designated locations . We reduce revenue based on estimates of future credits to be granted to customers . Credits include volume-based incentives, other special pricing arrangements and product returns due to quality issues . We also grant discounts to some distributors for prompt payments . Our estimates of future credits are based on historical experience, analysis of product shipments and contractual arrangements with customers and distributors . In 2011, about 40 percent of our revenue was generated from sales of our products to distributors . We recognize distributor revenue net of allowances, which are management’s estimates based on analysis of historical data, current economic conditions and contractual terms . These allowances recognize the impact of credits granted to distributors under certain programs common in the semiconductor industry whereby distributors receive certain price adjustments to meet individual competitive opportunities, or are allowed to return or scrap a limited amount of product in accordance with contractual terms agreed upon with the distributor, or receive price protection credits when our standard published prices are lowered from the price the distributor paid for product still in its inventory . Historical claims data are maintained for each of the programs, with differences among geographic regions taken into consideration . We continually monitor the actual claimed allowances against our estimates, and we adjust our estimates as appropriate to reflect trends in distributor revenue and inventory levels . Allowances are also adjusted when recent historical data do not represent anticipated future activity . About 30 percent of our distributor revenue is generated from sales of consigned inventory, and we expect this proportion to grow over time . The allowances we record against this revenue are not material . In addition, we monitor collectability of accounts receivable primarily through review of the accounts receivable aging . When collection is at risk, we assess the impact on amounts recorded for bad debts and, if necessary, will record a charge in the period such determination is made . Income taxes In determining net income for financial statement purposes, we must make certain estimates and judgments in the calculation of tax provisions and the resultant tax liabilities, and in the recoverability of deferred tax assets that arise from temporary differences between the tax and financial statement recognition of revenue and expense . In the ordinary course of global business, there may be many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain . The calculation of tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws . We recognize potential liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U .S . and other tax jurisdictions based on an estimate of the ultimate resolution of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due . Although we believe the estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be different than what is reflected in the historical income tax provisions and accruals . As part of our financial process, we must assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets can be recovered . If recovery is not likely, the provision for taxes must be increased by recording a reserve in the form of a valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets that are estimated not to be ultimately recoverable . In this process, certain relevant criteria are evaluated including the existence of deferred tax liabilities that can be used to absorb deferred tax assets, the taxable income in prior years that can be used to absorb net operating losses and credit carrybacks, and taxable income in future years . Our judgment regarding future recoverability of our deferred tax assets based on these criteria may change due to various factors, including changes in U .S . or international tax laws and changes in market conditions and their impact on our assessment of taxable income in future periods . These changes, if any, may require material adjustments to the deferred tax assets and an accompanying reduction or increase in net income in the period when such determinations are made . In addition to the factors described above, the effective tax rate reflected in forward-looking statements is based on then-current tax law . Significant changes during the year in enacted tax law could affect these estimates . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 4 9 R E P O R T A N N U A L Inventory valuation allowances Inventory is valued net of allowances for unsalable or obsolete raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods . Allowances are determined quarterly by comparing inventory levels of individual materials and parts to historical usage rates, current backlog and estimated future sales and by analyzing the age of inventory, in order to identify specific components of inventory that are judged unlikely to be sold . Allowances are also calculated quarterly for instances where inventoried costs for individual products are in excess of market prices for those products . In addition to this specific identification process, statistical allowances are calculated for remaining inventory based on historical write-offs of inventory for salability and obsolescence reasons . Actual future write-offs of inventory for salability and obsolescence reasons may differ from estimates and calculations used to determine valuation allowances due to changes in customer demand, customer negotiations, technology shifts and other factors . Business combinations The acquisition method of accounting requires that we recognize the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair values . Goodwill is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the acquisition date net fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed . The measurement of the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires considerable judgment . Although independent appraisals may be used to assist in the determination of the fair values of certain assets and liabilities, those determinations are usually based on significant estimates provided by management, such as forecasted revenue or profit . In determining the fair value of intangible assets, an income approach is generally used and may incorporate the use of a discounted cash flow method . In applying the discounted cash flow method, the estimated future cash flows and residual values for each intangible asset are discounted to a present value using a discount rate based on an estimated weighted average cost of capital for the semiconductor industry . These cash flow projections are based on management’s estimates of economic and market conditions including revenue growth rates, operating margins, capital expenditures and working capital requirements . While we use our best estimates and assumptions as part of the process to value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement . During the measurement period, which occurs before finalization of the purchase price allocation, changes in assumptions and estimates that result in adjustments to the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded on a retrospective basis as of the acquisition date, with the corresponding offset to goodwill . Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments will be recorded to our Consolidated statements of income . The measurement period for the National acquisition concluded on December 31, 2011 . Impairment of acquisition-related intangibles and goodwill We review acquisition-related intangible assets for impairment when certain indicators suggest the carrying amount may not be recoverable . Factors considered include the underperformance of an asset compared with expectations and shortened useful lives due to planned changes in the use of the assets . Recoverability is determined by comparing the carrying amount of the assets to estimated future undiscounted cash flows . If future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, an impairment charge would be recognized for the excess of the carrying amount over fair value, determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique . Additionally, in the case of intangible assets that will continue to be used in future periods, a shortened useful life may be utilized if appropriate, resulting in accelerated amortization based upon the expected net realizable value of the asset at the date the asset will no longer be utilized . We review goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if certain impairment indicators arise, such as significant changes in business climate, operating performance or competition, or upon the disposition of a significant portion of a reporting unit . A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred between annual test dates . This impairment review compares the fair value for each reporting unit containing goodwill to its carrying value . Determining the fair value of a reporting unit involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including projected future cash flows, discount rates based on weighted average cost of capital and future economic and market conditions . We base our fair-value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable . Actual cash flow amounts for future periods may differ from estimates used in impairment testing . 5 0 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Changes in accounting standards See Changes in Accounting Standards in Note 1 to the financial statements for a discussion of new accounting and reporting standards that have not yet been adopted . L A U N N A T R O P E R Off-balance sheet arrangements As of December 31, 2011, we had no significant off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K . Commitments and contingencies See Note 14 to the financial statements for a discussion of our commitments and contingencies . Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk Foreign exchange risk The U .S . dollar is the functional currency for financial reporting . We use forward currency exchange contracts to reduce the earnings impact exchange rate fluctuations may have on our non-U .S . dollar net balance sheet exposures . For example, at year-end 2011, we had forward currency exchange contracts outstanding with a notional value of $516 million to hedge net balance sheet exposures (including $253 million to sell Japanese yen, $105 million to sell euros and $39 million to sell British pound sterling) . Similar hedging activities existed at year-end 2010 . Because most of the aggregate non-U .S . dollar balance sheet exposure is hedged by these forward currency exchange contracts, based on year-end 2011 balances and currency exchange rates, a hypothetical 10 percent plus or minus fluctuation in non-U .S . currency exchange rates would result in a pre-tax currency exchange gain or loss of approximately $3 million . Interest rate risk We have the following potential exposure to changes in interest rates: (1) the effect of changes in interest rates on the fair value of our investments in cash equivalents and short-term investments, which could produce a gain or a loss; and (2) the effect of changes in interest rates on the fair value of our debt and an associated interest rate swap . As of December 31, 2011, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would decrease the fair value of our long-term debt and the associated interest rate swap by $117 million . Because interest rates on our long-term debt are fixed or have been swapped to fixed rates, changes in interest rates would not affect the cash flows associated with long-term debt . A hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates would not change the fair value of our $1 .0 billion of outstanding commercial paper by a material amount because of its short duration . Equity risk Long-term investments at year-end 2011 include the following: • Investments in mutual funds – includes mutual funds that were selected to generate returns that offset changes in certain liabilities related to deferred compensation arrangements . The mutual funds hold a variety of debt and equity investments . • Investments in venture capital funds – includes investments in limited partnerships (accounted for under either the equity or cost method) . • Equity investments – includes non-marketable (non-publicly traded) equity securities. Investments in mutual funds are stated at fair value . Changes in prices of the mutual fund investments are expected to offset related changes in deferred compensation liabilities such that a 10 percent increase or decrease in the investments’ fair values would not materially affect operating results . Non-marketable equity securities and some venture capital funds are stated at cost . Impairments deemed to be other-than-temporary are expensed in net income . Investments in the remaining venture capital funds are stated using the equity method . See Note 9 to the financial statements for details of equity and other long-term investments . T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 5 1 R E P O R T A N N U A L Quarterly financial data [Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts] 2011 Quarter 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,392 Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,728 Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 666 Earnings per common share: $ 3,458 1,753 905 $ 672 $ 3,466 1,744 814 $ 601 $ 3,420 1,548 365 $ 298 Basic earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.56 Diluted earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.55 $ 0.57 $ 0.56 $ 0.52 $ 0.51 $ 0.26 $ 0.25 2010 Quarter 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,205 Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,689 Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 658 Earnings per common share: $ 3,496 1,894 1,107 $ 769 $ 3,740 2,039 1,227 $ 859 $ 3,525 1,869 1,230 $ 942 Basic earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 .53 Diluted earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 .52 $ 0 .63 $ 0 .62 $ 0 .71 $ 0 .71 $ 0 .79 $ 0 .78 Included in the results above were the following items: 2011 Quarter 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Acquisition-related charges (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2 $ 256 $ 103 $ 153 Restructuring charges (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ — $ — $ 112 Recorded as Cost of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recorded as Acquisition charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ — $ $ 2 $ 154 7 $ 147 $ 13 $ 13 2010 Restructuring charges (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on divestiture of product line (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Federal research tax credit benefit (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Quarter 1st 2nd 3rd 4th $ 10 $ 17 $ 4 1 $ — $ — $ — $ 144 $ 50 $ — $ — $ 4 $ (a) See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information . (b) See Note 4 to the financial statements for additional information . (c) See Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information . (d) The fourth quarter 2010 amount of $50 million was related to the U .S . federal research tax credit, which was reinstated in December 2010 and retroactive to January of that year, and which expired at the end of 2011 . 5 2 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Common stock prices and dividends In 2011, TI common stock was listed on the New York Stock Exchange . The table below shows the high and low closing prices of TI common stock as reported by Bloomberg L .P . and the dividends paid per common share for each quarter during the past two years . On December 15, 2011, we announced that we were transferring our stock exchange listing to The NASDAQ Global Select Market, effective January 1, 2012, with TI shares to begin trading as a NASDAQ-listed security on January 3, 2012 . TI common stock continues to trade under the TXN symbol and is traded principally on NASDAQ . L A U N N A T R O P E R Quarter 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Stock prices: Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2011 High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 36.71 32.25 2010 High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 26 .34 22 .50 Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 35.98 30.96 $ 27 .16 23 .28 $ 33.66 24.34 $ 27 .14 23 .02 $ 32.09 26.08 $ 33 .75 27 .21 Dividends paid: 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.13 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 .12 $ 0.13 $ 0 .12 $ 0.13 $ 0 .12 $ 0.17 $ 0 .13 Comparison of total shareholder return This graph compares TI’s total shareholder return with the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Information Technology Index over a five-year period, beginning December 31, 2006, and ending December 31, 2011 . The total shareholder return assumes $100 invested at the beginning of the period in TI common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Information Technology Index . It also assumes reinvestment of all dividends . COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* Among Texas Instruments Incorporated, the S&P 500 Index, and the S&P Information Technology Index $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 12/06 12/07 12/08 12/09 12/10 12/11 Texas Instruments Incorporated S&P 500 S&P Information Technology *$100 invested on 12/31/06 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31. Texas Instruments Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S&P 500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S&P Information Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $100 $100 $100 $ 117 $105 $116 $55 $66 $66 $ 95 $ 84 $ 107 $ 121 $ 97 $ 118 $ 110 $ 99 $ 121 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T ■ 5 3 “Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: R E P O R T A N N U A L This report includes forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 . These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by phrases such as TI or its management “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “foresees,” “forecasts,” “estimates” or other words or phrases of similar import . Similarly, statements herein that describe TI’s business strategy, outlook, objectives, plans, intentions or goals also are forward-looking statements . All such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements . We urge you to carefully consider the following important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations of TI or its management: • Market demand for semiconductors, particularly in key markets such as communications, computing, industrial, and consumer electronics; • TI’s ability to maintain or improve profit margins, including its ability to utilize its manufacturing facilities at sufficient levels to cover its fixed operating costs, in an intensely competitive and cyclical industry; • TI’s ability to develop, manufacture and market innovative products in a rapidly changing technological environment; • TI’s ability to compete in products and prices in an intensely competitive industry; • TI’s ability to maintain and enforce a strong intellectual property portfolio and obtain needed licenses from third parties; • Expiration of license agreements between TI and its patent licensees, and market conditions reducing royalty payments to TI; • Economic, social and political conditions in the countries in which TI, its customers or its suppliers operate, including security risks, health conditions, possible disruptions in transportation networks and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; • Natural events such as severe weather and earthquakes in the locations in which TI, its customers or its suppliers operate; • Availability and cost of raw materials, utilities, manufacturing equipment, third-party manufacturing services and manufacturing technology; • Changes in the tax rate applicable to TI as the result of changes in tax law, the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed, the outcome of tax audits and the ability to realize deferred tax assets; • Changes in laws and regulations to which TI or its suppliers are or may become subject, such as those imposing fees or reporting or substitution costs relating to the discharge of emissions into the environment or the use of certain raw materials in our manufacturing processes; • Losses or curtailments of purchases from key customers and the timing and amount of distributor and other customer inventory adjustments; • Customer demand that differs from our forecasts; • The financial impact of inadequate or excess TI inventory that results from demand that differs from projections; • Impairments of our non-financial assets; • Product liability or warranty claims, claims based on epidemic or delivery failure or recalls by TI customers for a product containing a TI part; • TI’s ability to recruit and retain skilled personnel; • Timely implementation of new manufacturing technologies, installation of manufacturing equipment and the ability to obtain needed third-party foundry and assembly/test subcontract services; • TI’s obligation to make principal and interest payments on its debt; and • TI’s ability to successfully integrate National Semiconductor’s operations, product lines and technologies, and to realize opportunities for growth and cost savings from the acquisition . For a more detailed discussion of these factors see the Risk Factors discussion in Item 1A of our most recent Form 10-K . The forward-looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date of this report (March 2012), and we undertake no obligation to update the forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances . 5 4 ■ 2 0 1 1 A N N U A L R E P O R T T E X A S I N S T R U M E N T S Board of directors, executive officers Robert E. Sanchez President and Chief Operating Officer, Ryder System, Inc. Wayne R. Sanders Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Kimberly-Clark Corporation Ruth J. Simmons President, Brown University Christine Todd Whitman President, The Whitman Strategy Group Executive officers Richard K. Templeton Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer Stephen A. Anderson Senior Vice President Brian T. Crutcher Senior Vice President R. Gregory Delagi Senior Vice President David K. Heacock Senior Vice President Joseph F. Hubach Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel Sami Kiriaki Senior Vice President Melendy E. Lovett Senior Vice President; President, Education Technology Gregg A. Lowe Senior Vice President Kevin P. March Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Robert K. Novak Senior Vice President Kevin J. Ritchie Senior Vice President John J. Szczsponik, Jr. Senior Vice President Teresa L. West Senior Vice President Darla H. Whitaker Senior Vice President Directors Richard K. Templeton Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Texas Instruments Incorporated Ralph W. Babb, Jr. Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Comerica Incorporated and Comerica Bank Daniel A. Carp Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Eastman Kodak Company Carrie S. Cox Chief Executive Officer, Humacyte, Inc. Pamela H. Patsley Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, MoneyGram International, Inc. TI Fellows TI Fellows are engineers, scientists or technologists who are recognized by peers and TI management for outstanding performance. Fellows are elected based on exceptional technical contributions that significantly contribute to TI’s shareholder value. TI Senior Fellow announced in 2011: Baher Haroun TI Fellows announced in 2011: Dennis Monticelli Vishy Pentakota Stockholder and other information Stockholder records information First-class, registered and certified mail: Computershare Investor Services, L.L.C. P. O. Box 43078 Providence, RI 02940-3078 Overnight delivery: Computershare Investor Services, L.L.C. 250 Royall Street, Mail Stop 1A Canton, MA 02021 Toll free: 800-981-8676 Phone: 312-360-5151 For general information: www.computershare.com/contactus www-us.computershare.com SEC Form 10-K Stockholders may obtain a copy of the company’s annual report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K (except for exhibits) and its audited financial statements without charge by writing to: Investor Relations P.O. Box 660199, MS 8657 Dallas, TX 75266-0199 DLP and OMAP are trademarks of Texas Instruments. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 226966_TI_CVR_R5.indd 3 2/21/12 6:00 PM Texas Instruments Incorporated P.O. Box 660199 Dallas, TX 75266-0199 www.ti.com An equal opportunity employer © 2012 Texas Instruments Incorporated TI-30001M 226966_TI_CVR_R3.indd 4 2/15/12 2:30 PM 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above