2013 Annual Report
Notice of 2014 Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement
TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS
Richard K. Templeton
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Strategy is about making choices. And over the last decade, we have
made a number of them, big and small, all with the objective of
creating a company that can deliver sustainable revenue growth, realize
differentiated positions and generate strong, long-term returns.
We chose to emphasize Analog and Embedded Processing and walk
away from our former Wireless business, which was about 30 percent
of revenue in 2006 and required large, hard-to-recoup investments in
R&D and capital equipment.
We chose to focus on products and technologies with long life spans
that could generate sustainable revenue and returns.
We chose to aggressively put manufacturing capacity in place during
the depths of the economy’s declines (at an average price savings of
about 90 cents per dollar), so that our pipeline is always ready to
meet demand.
We chose to make a major acquisition of National Semiconductor,
which dovetailed nicely with where we wanted to go: analog, catalog,
industrial and automotive.
Of course, choices have consequences. I’m pleased to say ours have
been good ones. Analog and Embedded Processing have gained share
each of the past four years. Gross margins were strong in the year, and
we set a new record in the third quarter. And perhaps most important,
we now have a portfolio that allows cash generation to dominate our
thinking.
Long term, we believe the ability to generate cash is what matters to
any business, and in 2013, we introduced investors to our capital
management strategy. The strategy codified some past practices,
while reaffirming our belief that these practices are sustainable well
into the future.
We expect to consistently convert 20-25 percent of our revenue into
free cash flow, and return all of it, minus debt repayment, to investors
in the form of dividends and stock repurchases. In 2013, TI generated
$3 billion of free cash flow, or 24 percent of our revenue, and we
returned more than that, $4 billion in total, to shareholders. This included
raising our quarterly dividend 43 percent – our tenth consecutive year
of dividend increases.
Bottom line, TI is able to grow, generate cash and return it to
shareholders in a way that few companies can match. Among
S&P 500 companies in 2013, TI ranked in the top quartile in converting
revenue to free cash flow and in the top 10th percentile in returning
cash as a percentage of revenue.
Despite the progress and returns, we know our work is not done.
We intend to make TI even stronger over the next five years. Let me
highlight where we’re spending our energies and resources.
We want to strengthen our portfolio of products. That means even more
Analog and Embedded Processing, which we expect to be 90 percent
of our revenue within the next few years. We’re well on our way, as
79 percent of our revenue came from Analog and Embedded Processing
in 2013, up from 44 percent in 2006 when this journey began.
We want industrial and automotive to be a bigger part of our future
because of the diversity, long product lives and growth opportunities
they provide. We’ve made good progress, with 37 percent of revenue
now coming from these markets – a five percentage point increase
just in the last year.
We want more of our revenue coming from catalog and application-
specific standard products because they have attributes that matter
to us: long product lives, many customers, great representation in
industrial and automotive, and good profitability.
We want further diversity in our customer base, providing more stability
and growth opportunities. This means more engagements with small
customers, and new wins with large customers. One indicator of our
customer diversity profile is that our largest customer today drives only
7 percent of revenue; contrast that with 2009 when our largest customer
was 24 percent of revenue.
In summary, the choices we’ve made have created a sustainable
business model that we believe will serve TI and its shareholders for
years to come. Our strategy can deliver growth, profitability, and enable
us to generate and return cash. It’s a strategy that mirrors where we
believe our industry is heading – toward a world where semiconductors
touch people’s lives every day and everywhere. It’s a strategy that has
made us who we are and who we will be – strong, stable, competitive –
with a long runway of opportunities still ahead of us.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
DIRE CTOR S
Richard K. Templeton
Chairman of the Board,
President and
Chief Executive Officer,
Texas Instruments Incorporated
Ralph W. Babb, Jr.
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer,
Comerica Incorporated and
Comerica Bank
Mark A. Blinn
President and
Chief Executive Officer,
Flowserve Corporation
Daniel A. Carp
Retired Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer,
Eastman Kodak Company
Carrie S. Cox
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer,
Humacyte, Inc.
TI FELLOWS
TI Fellows are engineers, scientists or technologists who are recognized by
peers and TI management for outstanding performance. Fellows are elected
based on exceptional technical contributions that significantly contribute to
TI’s shareholder value.
STOCKHOLDER AND OTHER INFORMATION
Stockholder records information
Stockholder correspondence:
Computershare
P. O. Box 30170
College Station, TX 77842-3170
Toll free: 800-981-8676
Phone: 781-575-2000
Website: www.computershare.com/investor
For online inquiries: https://www-us.computershare.com/investor/contact
Note: Free cash flow (non-GAAP) = Cash flow from operations minus Capital expenditures. See page 47 for details.
DLP, OMAP and the platform bar are trademarks of Texas Instruments. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
262200_Texas_CVR_R3.indd 2
2/19/14 3:41 PM
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
NOTICE OF 2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 1
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSConsolidated statements of income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2Consolidated statements of comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3Consolidated balance sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Consolidated statements of cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Notes to financial statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Description of business and significant accounting policies and practices Acquisition-related charges Restructuring charges/other Losses associated with the 2011 earthquake in Japan Stock-based compensation Profit sharing plans Income taxes Financial instruments and risk concentrationReport of independent registered public accounting firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35Report by management on internal control over financial reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36Report of independent registered public accounting firm on internal control over financial reporting . . . . . . . . 37Summary of selected financial data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Overview Results of operations Prior results of operations – 2012 compared with 2011 Restructuring actions Financial condition Liquidity and capital resources Non-GAAP financial informationQuarterly financial data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51Common stock prices and dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52Comparison of total shareholder return . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52Safe Harbor Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53Notice of annual meeting of stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55Proxy statement table of contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Valuation of debt and equity investments and certain liabilities Goodwill and acquisition-related intangibles Postretirement benefit plans Debt and lines of credit Commitments and contingencies Stockholders’ equity Supplemental financial information Segment and geographic area data Long-term contractual obligations Critical accounting policies Changes in accounting standards Off-balance sheet arrangements Commitments and contingencies Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market riskFINANCIAL STATEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS
Consolidated Statements of Income
[Millions of dollars, except share and per-share amounts]
For Years Ended
December 31,
2013
2012
2011
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Revenue � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Cost of revenue (COR) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Gross profit � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Research and development (R&D) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Acquisition charges � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Restructuring charges/other � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Operating profit� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Other income (expense), net (OI&E) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Interest and debt expense � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Income before income taxes � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Provision for income taxes � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Net income � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
$12,205
5,841
6,364
1,522
1,858
341
(189)
2,832
17
95
2,754
592
$ 2,162
$12,825
6,457
6,368
1,877
1,804
450
264
1,973
47
85
1,935
176
$ 1,759
$13,735
6,963
6,772
1,715
1,638
315
112
2,992
5
42
2,955
719
$ 2,236
Earnings per common share:
Basic � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Diluted � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
$
$
1.94
1.91
$
$
1�53
1�51
$
$
1�91
1�88
Average shares outstanding (millions):
Basic � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Diluted � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
1,098
1,113
1,132
1,146
1,151
1,171
Cash dividends declared per share of common stock � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
$
1.07
$
0�72
$
0�56
See accompanying notes�
2 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
[Millions of dollars]
Net income � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Available-for-sale investments:
Unrealized gains (losses), net of tax benefit (expense) of $0, ($1) and $1 � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Reclassification to Net income, net of tax benefit (expense) of $0, $0 and ($7) � � � � � � � � � �
Net actuarial gains (losses) of defined benefit plans:
Adjustment, net of tax benefit (expense) of ($60), $29 and $65 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Reclassification to Net income, net of tax benefit (expense) of ($37), ($104) and ($28) � � � � � �
Prior service cost of defined benefit plans:
Adjustment, net of tax benefit (expense) of $1, $1 and $5 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Reclassification to Net income, net of tax benefit (expense) of $2, $0 and ($1) � � � � � � � � � �
Derivative instrument:
For Years Ended
December 31,
2013
2012
2011
$2,162
$1,759
$2,236
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
—
—
105
71
(3)
(3)
3
—
(81)
160
(2)
—
(2)
12
(124)
48
(9)
2
Change in fair value, net of tax benefit (expense) of $0, $1 and $1 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Reclassification to Net income, net of tax benefit (expense) of ($1), $0 and $0 � � � � � � � � � �
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Total comprehensive income � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
—
1
171
$2,333
(3)
—
77
$1,836
(2)
—
(75)
$2,161
See accompanying notes�
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 3
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Consolidated Balance Sheets
[Millions of dollars, except share amounts]
Assets
Current assets:
December 31,
2013
2012
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Cash and cash equivalents � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � $ 1,627
Short-term investments � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
2,202
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of ($22) and ($31) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
1,203
Raw materials � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
102
Work in process � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
919
Finished goods � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
710
Inventories � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
1,731
Deferred income taxes � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
393
Prepaid expenses and other current assets � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
863
Total current assets � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
8,019
Property, plant and equipment at cost � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
6,556
Accumulated depreciation � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
(3,157)
Property, plant and equipment, net � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
3,399
Long-term investments � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
216
Goodwill, net � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
4,362
Acquisition-related intangibles, net � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
2,223
Deferred income taxes � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
207
Capitalized software licenses, net � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
118
Overfunded retirement plans � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
130
Other assets � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
264
Total assets � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � $ 18,938
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � $ 1,000
Accounts payable � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
422
Accrued compensation � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
554
Income taxes payable � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
119
Deferred income taxes � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
1
Accrued expenses and other liabilities � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
651
Total current liabilities � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
2,747
Long-term debt � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
4,158
Underfunded retirement plans � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
216
Deferred income taxes � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
548
Deferred credits and other liabilities � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
462
Total liabilities � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
8,131
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $25 par value� Authorized – 10,000,000 shares�
$ 1,416
2,549
1,230
116
935
706
1,757
473
805
8,230
6,891
(2,979)
3,912
215
4,362
2,558
280
142
68
254
$ 20,021
$ 1,500
444
524
79
2
881
3,430
4,186
269
572
603
9,060
Participating cumulative preferred� None issued� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
—
—
Common stock, $1 par value� Authorized – 2,400,000,000 shares�
Shares issued: 1,740,815,939 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Paid-in capital � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Retained earnings � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Treasury common stock at cost�
1,741
1,211
28,173
1,741
1,176
27,205
Shares: 2013 – 658,012,970; 2012 – 632,636,970 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Total stockholders’ equity � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
(19,790)
(528)
10,807
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � $ 18,938
(18,462)
(699)
10,961
$ 20,021
See accompanying notes�
4 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
[Millions of dollars]
For Years Ended
December 31,
2013
2012
2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
$ 2,162
$ 1,759
$ 2,236
Adjustments to Net income:
Depreciation � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Amortization of capitalized software � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Stock-based compensation � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Gain on sales of assets � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Deferred income taxes � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Gain on transfer of Japan substitutional pension � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Increase (decrease) from changes in:
Accounts receivable � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Inventories � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Prepaid expenses and other current assets � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Accounts payable and accrued expenses � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Accrued compensation � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Income taxes payable � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Changes in funded status of retirement plans � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Other � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Cash flows from operating activities � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Proceeds from asset sales and insurance recovery � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Purchases of short-term investments � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Proceeds from short-term investments � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Other � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Cash flows from investing activities � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt and commercial paper borrowings � � � � � � � � � � �
Repayment of debt and commercial paper borrowings � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Dividends paid � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Stock repurchases � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Proceeds from common stock transactions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Excess tax benefit from share-based payments � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Other � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Cash flows from financing activities � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
879
336
82
287
(6)
50
—
16
26
(136)
(284)
18
78
28
(152)
3,384
(412)
21
(3,907)
4,249
—
46
(3)
986
(1,500)
(1,175)
(2,868)
1,314
80
(7)
(3,170)
957
342
102
263
—
130
(144)
311
5
162
99
(82)
(229)
(198)
(63)
3,414
904
111
93
269
(5)
55
—
112
(17)
(203)
2
(77)
(85)
(7)
(132)
3,256
(495)
—
(2,802)
2,198
(816)
16
(3,653)
3,555
— (5,425)
151
60
(6,172)
(1,039)
1,492
(1,375)
(819)
(1,800)
523
38
(10)
(1,951)
4,697
(200)
(644)
(1,973)
690
31
(12)
2,589
Net change in Cash and cash equivalents � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
211
1,416
$ 1,627
424
992
$ 1,416
(327)
1,319
992
$
See accompanying notes�
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 5
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
[Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts]
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Treasury
Common
Stock
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Balance, December 31, 2010 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
$1,740
$1,114
$ 24,695
$(16,411)
$(701)
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
2011
Net income � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Dividends declared and paid ($�56 per share) � � � � � � � � � � �
Common stock issued for stock-based awards � � � � � � � � � � �
Stock repurchases � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Stock-based compensation� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Tax impact from exercise of options � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes � � � � � � � � � �
Dividend equivalents paid on restricted stock units � � � � � � � � �
Other � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Balance, December 31, 2011 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
2012
Net income � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Dividends declared and paid ($�72 per share) � � � � � � � � � � �
Common stock issued for stock-based awards � � � � � � � � � � �
Stock repurchases � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Stock-based compensation� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Tax impact from exercise of options � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes � � � � � � � � � �
Dividend equivalents paid on restricted stock units � � � � � � � � �
Balance, December 31, 2012 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,741
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,741
—
—
(252)
—
269
45
—
—
18
1,194
—
—
(337)
—
263
56
—
—
1,176
2,236
(644)
—
—
—
—
—
(9)
—
26,278
1,759
(819)
—
—
—
—
—
(13)
27,205
—
—
898
(1,973)
—
—
—
—
1
(17,485)
—
—
823
(1,800)
—
—
—
—
(18,462)
2013
Net income � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Dividends declared and paid ($1.07 per share) � � � � � � � � �
Common stock issued for stock-based awards � � � � � � � � �
Stock repurchases � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Stock-based compensation � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Tax impact from exercise of options � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes � � � � � � � �
Dividend equivalents paid on restricted stock units � � � � � � �
Other � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Balance, December 31, 2013 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$1,741
—
—
(273)
—
287
25
—
—
(4)
$1,211
2,162
(1,175)
—
—
—
—
—
(19)
—
$ 28,173
—
—
1,540
(2,868)
—
—
—
—
—
$(19,790)
See accompanying notes�
—
—
—
—
—
—
(75)
—
—
(776)
—
—
—
—
—
—
77
—
(699)
—
—
—
—
—
—
171
—
—
$(528)
6 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Description of business and significant accounting policies and practices
Business
At Texas Instruments (TI), we design and make semiconductors that we sell to electronics designers and manufacturers all over the
world. We have two reportable segments, which are established along major categories of products as follows:
• Analog – consists of the following major product lines: High Volume Analog & Logic (HVAL), Power Management (Power), High
Performance Analog (HPA) and Silicon Valley Analog (SVA). SVA consists primarily of products that we acquired through our
purchase of National Semiconductor Corporation (National) in 2011.
• Embedded Processing – consists of the following major product lines: Processors, Microcontrollers and Connectivity.
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
We report the results of our remaining business activities in Other. As a result of our decision to exit certain product lines, Other
also includes our baseband products and our OMAP™ applications processors and connectivity products sold into smartphones and
consumer tablets. These products, which we refer to as “legacy wireless products,” were part of our former Wireless segment. The
Wireless segment was eliminated effective January 1, 2013. To conform to this revised reporting structure, we filed a Form 8-K on
May 3, 2013, to recast prior period segment information presented in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. See Note
16 for additional information on our business segments.
Basis of presentation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(U.S. GAAP). The basis of these financial statements is comparable for all periods presented herein.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation. All dollar amounts in the financial statements and tables in these notes, except per-share amounts,
are stated in millions of U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. We have reclassified certain amounts in the prior periods’ financial
statements to conform to the 2013 presentation. The preparation of financial statements requires the use of estimates from which final
results may vary.
In September 2011, we completed the acquisition of National. We accounted for this transaction under Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 805 – Business Combinations, and the consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of National
from the date of acquisition. See Note 2 for more information.
Revenue recognition
We recognize revenue from direct sales of our products to our customers, including shipping fees, when title and risk of loss pass to
the customer, which usually occurs upon shipment or delivery, depending upon the terms of the sales order; when persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists; when sales amounts are fixed or determinable; and when collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue from
sales of our products that are subject to inventory consignment agreements is recognized consistent with the principles discussed
above, but delivery occurs when the customer pulls product from consignment inventory that we store at designated locations.
Estimates of product returns for quality reasons and of price allowances, which are based on historical experience, product shipment
analysis and customer contractual arrangements, are recorded when revenue is recognized. Allowances include volume-based
incentives and special pricing arrangements. In addition, we record allowances for accounts receivable that we estimate may not
be collected.
We recognize revenue from direct sales of our products to our distributors, net of allowances, consistent with the principles
discussed above. Title transfers to the distributors at delivery or when the products are pulled from consignment inventory, and payment
is due on our standard commercial terms; payment terms are not contingent upon resale of the products. We calculate credit allowances
based on historical data, current economic conditions and contractual terms. For instance, we sell to distributors at standard published
prices, but we may grant them price adjustment credits in response to individual competitive opportunities they may have. To estimate
allowances, we use statistical percentages of revenue, determined quarterly, based upon recent historical adjustment trends. We also
provide allowances for certain growth-based incentives.
We provide distributors an allowance to scrap certain slow-selling or obsolete products in their inventory, estimated as a negotiated
fixed percentage of each distributor’s purchases from us. In addition, if we publish a new price for a product that is lower than that
paid by distributors for the same product still remaining in each distributor’s on-hand inventory, we may credit them for the difference
between those prices. The allowance for this type of credit is based on the identified product price difference applied to our estimate
of each distributor’s on-hand inventory of that product. We believe we can reasonably and reliably estimate allowances for credits to
distributors in a timely manner.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 7
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
We determine the amount and timing of royalty revenue based on our contractual agreements with intellectual property licensees.
We recognize royalty revenue when earned under the terms of the agreements and when we consider realization of payment to be
probable. Where royalties are based on a percentage of licensee sales of royalty-bearing products, we recognize royalty revenue by
applying this percentage to our estimate of applicable licensee sales. We base this estimate on historical experience and an analysis of
each licensee’s sales results. Where royalties are based on fixed payment amounts, we recognize royalty revenue ratably over the term
of the royalty agreement. Where warranted, revenue from licensees may be recognized on a cash basis.
We include shipping and handling costs in COR.
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Advertising costs
We expense advertising and other promotional costs as incurred. This expense was $46 million in 2013, $46 million in 2012 and
$43 million in 2011.
Restructuring charges
Restructuring charges may consist of voluntary or involuntary severance-related charges, asset-related charges and other costs
due to exit activities. We recognize voluntary termination benefits when the employee accepts the offered benefit arrangement. We
recognize involuntary severance-related charges depending on whether the termination benefits are provided under an ongoing benefit
arrangement or under a one-time benefit arrangement. If the former, we recognize the charges once they are probable and the amounts
are estimable. If the latter, we recognize the charges once the benefits have been communicated to employees.
Restructuring activities associated with assets are recorded as an adjustment to the basis of the asset, not as a liability. When we
commit to a plan to abandon a long-lived asset before the end of its previously estimated useful life, we accelerate the recognition of
depreciation to reflect the use of the asset over its shortened useful life. When an asset is held to be sold, we write down the carrying
value to its net realizable value and cease depreciation. Restructuring actions may be viewed as an impairment indicator requiring
testing of the recoverability of intangible assets, including goodwill.
Income taxes
We account for income taxes using an asset and liability approach. We record the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the
current year and the deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial
statements or tax returns. We record a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will
not be realized.
Other assessed taxes
Some transactions require us to collect taxes such as sales, value-added and excise taxes from our customers. These transactions are
presented in our statements of income on a net (excluded from revenue) basis.
Earnings per share (EPS)
Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents, such as our
restricted stock units (RSUs), are considered to be participating securities and the two-class method is used for purposes of calculating
EPS. Under the two-class method, a portion of net income is allocated to these participating securities and, therefore, is excluded from
the calculation of EPS allocated to common stock, as shown in the table below.
Computation and reconciliation of earnings per common share are as follows (shares in millions):
2013
2012
2011
Net Income
Shares
EPS
Net Income
Shares
EPS
Net Income
Shares
EPS
Basic EPS:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income allocated to RSUs . . . . . . . . . .
Income allocated to common stock for
$ 2,162
(37)
$ 1,759
(31)
$ 2,236
(35)
basic EPS calculation . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 2,125
1,098 $1.94
$ 1,728
1,132 $1.53
$ 2,201
1,151 $1.91
Adjustment for dilutive shares:
Stock-based compensation plans . . . . . .
Diluted EPS:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income allocated to RSUs . . . . . . . . . .
Income allocated to common stock for
$ 2,162
(36)
15
14
20
$ 1,759
(31)
$ 2,236
(34)
diluted EPS calculation . . . . . . . . . .
$ 2,126
1,113 $1.91
$ 1,728
1,146 $1.51
$ 2,202
1,171 $1.88
8 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
There were no potentially dilutive securities to exclude from the computation of diluted earnings per common share during 2013.
Potentially dilutive securities representing 52 million and 24 million shares of common stock that were outstanding during 2012 and
2011, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share for these periods because their effect
would have been anti-dilutive.
Investments
We present investments on our balance sheets as cash equivalents, short-term investments or long-term investments. Specific details
are as follows:
• Cash equivalents and short-term investments: We consider investments in debt securities with maturities of 90 days or less from
the date of our investment to be cash equivalents. We consider investments in debt securities with maturities beyond 90 days
from the date of our investment as being available for use in current operations and include them in short-term investments. The
primary objectives of our cash equivalent and short-term investment activities are to preserve capital and maintain liquidity while
generating appropriate returns.
• Long-term investments: Long-term investments consist of mutual funds, venture capital funds and non-marketable equity
securities.
• Classification of investments: Depending on our reasons for holding the investment and our ownership percentage, we classify
investments in securities as available for sale, trading, or equity- or cost-method investments, which are more fully described in
Note 9. We determine cost or amortized cost, as appropriate, on a specific identification basis.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value. Cost is generally computed on a currently adjusted
standard cost basis, which approximates cost on a first-in first-out basis. Standard cost is based on the normal utilization of installed
factory capacity. Cost associated with underutilization of capacity is expensed as incurred. Inventory held at consignment locations
is included in our finished goods inventory. Consigned inventory was $202 million and $169 million as of December 31, 2013 and
2012, respectively.
We review inventory quarterly for salability and obsolescence. A specific allowance is provided for inventory considered unlikely to
be sold. Remaining inventory includes a salability and obsolescence allowance based on an analysis of historical disposal activity. We
write off inventory in the period in which disposal occurs.
Property, plant and equipment; acquisition-related intangibles and other capitalized costs
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method.
Our cost basis includes certain assets acquired in business combinations that were initially recorded at fair value as of the date of
acquisition. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the
estimated useful lives of the improvements. We amortize acquisition-related intangibles on a straight-line basis over the estimated
economic life of the assets. Capitalized software licenses generally are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the license.
Fully depreciated or amortized assets are written off against accumulated depreciation or amortization.
Impairments of long-lived assets
We regularly review whether facts or circumstances exist that indicate the carrying values of property, plant and equipment or
other long-lived assets, including intangible assets, are impaired. We assess the recoverability of assets by comparing the projected
undiscounted net cash flows associated with those assets to their respective carrying amounts. Any impairment charge is based on the
excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is determined by available market valuations, if applicable,
or by discounted cash flows.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles
Goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if certain impairment indicators arise. We perform
our annual goodwill impairment test as of October 1 for our reporting units, which compares the fair value for each reporting unit to its
associated carrying value including goodwill. See Note 10 for additional information.
Foreign currency
The functional currency for our non-U.S. subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. Accounts recorded in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are
remeasured into the functional currency. Current assets (except inventories), deferred income taxes, other assets, current liabilities and
long-term liabilities are remeasured at exchange rates in effect at the end of each reporting period. Property, plant and equipment with
associated depreciation and inventories are valued at historic exchange rates. Revenue and expense accounts other than depreciation
for each month are remeasured at the appropriate daily rate of exchange. Currency exchange gains and losses from remeasurement are
credited or charged to OI&E.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 9
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Derivatives and hedging
In connection with the issuance of variable-rate long-term debt in May 2011, we entered into an interest rate swap designated as a
hedge of the variability of cash flows related to interest payments. Gains and losses from changes in the fair value of the interest rate
swap were credited or charged to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes (AOCI). We repaid this long-term debt
in the second quarter of 2013, and this interest rate swap was settled for no gain or loss. In association with the issuance of long-term
debt, we use financial derivatives such as treasury rate lock agreements that are recognized in AOCI and amortized over the life of the
related debt. The results of these derivative transactions have not been material.
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
We also use derivative financial instruments to manage exposure to foreign exchange risk. These instruments are primarily forward
foreign currency exchange contracts, which are used as economic hedges to reduce the earnings impact that exchange rate fluctuations
may have on our non-U.S. dollar net balance sheet exposures. Gains and losses from changes in the fair value of these forward foreign
currency exchange contracts are credited or charged to OI&E. We do not apply hedge accounting to our foreign currency derivative
instruments.
We do not use derivatives for speculative or trading purposes.
Changes in accounting standards
In January 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-01,
Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This standard clarifies that a
previously-issued standard on disclosure requirements relating to offsetting (or netting) financial instruments applies only to derivatives,
repurchase agreements and certain securities lending transactions. This standard was effective as of the first quarter of 2013 and did
not have a material impact on our financial disclosures as the derivatives to which it applies are not significant.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This standard requires an entity to disclose information about amounts reclassified out of
AOCI. This standard was effective as of the first quarter of 2013. See Note 15 for the required disclosure.
2. Acquisition-related charges
We incurred various costs as a result of the 2011 acquisition of National that are included in Other, consistent with how management
measures the performance of its segments. These total acquisition-related charges are as follows:
Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retention bonuses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Severance and other benefits:
Employment reductions announced at closing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change of control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transaction and other costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As recorded in Acquisition charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Distributor contract termination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventory related . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment related . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As recorded in COR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total acquisition-related charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Years Ended
December 31,
2012
2013
2011
$323
7
11
—
—
—
341
—
—
—
—
$341
$325
57
17
16
—
35
450
21
—
—
21
$471
$ 87
46
50
29
41
62
315
—
96
15
111
$426
Acquisition charges
The amount of recognized amortization of intangible assets resulting from the National acquisition is based on estimated useful lives.
See Note 10 for additional information.
Retention bonuses reflect amounts paid to former National employees who fulfilled agreed-upon service period obligations and were
recognized ratably over the required service period.
Stock-based compensation was recognized for the accelerated vesting of equity awards upon the termination of employees, with
additional compensation being recognized over the applicable vesting period for the remaining grantees.
1 0 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Severance and other benefits costs were for former National employees who were terminated after the closing date. These costs
totaled $70 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, with $41 million in charges related to change of control provisions under
existing employment agreements and $29 million in charges for announced employment reductions affecting about 350 jobs. All of
these jobs were eliminated by the end of 2012 as a result of redundancies and cost efficiency measures, with $16 million of additional
expense recognized in 2012. Of the $86 million in cumulative charges recognized through December 31, 2013, $3 million was paid in
2013, $65 million was paid in 2012 and $14 million was paid in 2011. The remaining $4 million will be paid in future years.
Transaction and other costs include various expenses incurred in connection with the National acquisition. In 2011, we also incurred
bridge financing costs.
COR
In 2011, we discontinued using one of National’s distributors. We acquired the distributor’s inventory at fair value, resulting in an
incremental charge of $21 million to COR upon sale of the inventory in 2012.
At acquisition, we recognized costs associated with the adjustments to write up the value of acquired inventory and property, plant
and equipment to fair value. These costs are in addition to the normal expensing of the acquired assets based on their carrying or book
value prior to the acquisition. The total fair-value write-up of $96 million for the acquired inventory was expensed as that inventory
was sold. The total fair-value write-up for the acquired property, plant and equipment was $436 million. In the fourth quarter of 2011,
depreciation was $15 million. It continues at a declining rate and is no longer separately disclosed as an acquisition-related charge.
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
3. Restructuring charges/other
Restructuring charges/other is comprised of the following components:
For Years Ended
December 31,
2013
2012
2011
Cumulative Since
January 1, 2011
Restructuring charges by action:
2013 actions
Severance and benefits cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 49
$ — $ —
$ 49
2012 Wireless action
Severance and benefits cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accelerated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other exit costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prior actions
Severance and benefits cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accelerated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other exit costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30
6
2
38
6
5
28
39
126
245
3
103
351
6
18
25
49
400
—
—
—
—
107
5
—
112
112
275
9
105
389
119
28
53
200
$638
Other:
Gain on technology transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on transfer of Japan substitutional pension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring charges/other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(315)
—
—
$(189)
—
(144)
8
$ 264
—
—
—
$112
Restructuring charges/other are recognized in Other. Restructuring actions related to the acquisition of National are discussed in Note 2
and the associated costs are reflected in the Acquisition charges line of our Consolidated statements of income.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 1 1
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
2013 actions
In January 2014, we announced cost-saving actions in Embedded Processing and in Japan to reduce expenses and focus our
investments on markets with greater potential for sustainable growth and strong long-term returns, which we expect to be substantially
complete by mid-2015. Cost reductions include the elimination of about 1,100 jobs worldwide. Total restructuring charges related to
these actions are expected to be about $80 million, all of which will be severance and related benefit costs. In the fourth quarter of
2013, we recorded restructuring charges of $49 million related to the action in Embedded Processing, and the remainder related to
Japan is expected to be recognized in the first quarter of 2014. As of December 31, 2013, no payments related to these restructuring
charges have been made.
2012 Wireless action
In 2012, we announced a restructuring of our Wireless business to reduce expenses and focus our investments on markets with greater
potential for sustainable growth and strong long-term returns. This action is now complete, eliminating about 1,700 jobs worldwide. We
recognized $389 million in cumulative restructuring charges, including a $90 million impairment of goodwill. As of December 31, 2013,
$180 million has been paid to terminated employees for severance and benefits.
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Prior actions
In 2012, we announced closure of two older semiconductor manufacturing facilities in Houston, Texas, and Hiji, Japan. Each facility
employed about 500 people. We recognized $200 million in cumulative restructuring charges related to these closures with both
complete by the end of 2013. As of December 31, 2013, $97 million has been paid to terminated employees for severance and benefits.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we carried immaterial liabilities related to actions commenced in 2008 and 2009. The related
expense was recognized in periods prior to 2011.
The table below reflects the changes in accrued restructuring balances associated with these actions:
2013 Actions
Severance
and Benefits
2012 Wireless Action
Prior Actions
Severance
and Benefits
Other
Charges
Severance
and Benefits
Other
Charges
Accrual at December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash items (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remaining accrual at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . .
Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash items (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remaining accrual at December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . .
Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash items (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remaining accrual at December 31, 2013 . . . . . . .
$—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
49
—
—
$ 49
$ —
—
—
—
—
245
—
(4)
241
30
—
(176)
$ 95
$ —
—
—
—
—
106
(106)
—
—
8
(6)
(2)
$ —
$ 22
107
(11)
(9)
109
6
3
(19)
99
6
(5)
(90)
$ 10
$
$
8
5
(5)
(1)
7
43
(18)
(23)
9
33
(11)
(24)
7
Total
$ 30
112
(16)
(10)
116
400
(121)
(46)
349
126
(22)
(292)
$ 161
(a) Reflects charges for goodwill impairment, stock-based compensation, impacts of postretirement benefit plans and accelerated
depreciation.
The accrual balances above are primarily a component of Accrued expenses and other liabilities or Deferred credits and other liabilities
on our Consolidated balance sheets, depending on the expected timing of payment.
1 2 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Other
Gain on technology transfer
During the second quarter of 2013, we entered into an agreement to transfer wireless connectivity technology to a customer. This
technology was associated with the former Wireless business, and we recognized a gain of $315 million on this transfer.
Gain on transfer of Japan substitutional pension
During the third quarter of 2012, we transferred the obligations and assets of the substitutional portion of our Japan pension plan to the
government of Japan, resulting in a net gain of $144 million. See Note 11 for additional details.
4. Losses associated with the 2011 earthquake in Japan
In March 2011, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake struck near our semiconductor manufacturing facilities in Japan. Our manufacturing site in
Miho suffered substantial damage. We maintain earthquake insurance policies in Japan for limited coverage for property damage and
business interruption losses.
In 2011, we incurred cumulative gross operating losses of $101 million related to the earthquake and associated events in Japan.
These losses related to property damage, the underutilization expense we incurred from having our manufacturing assets only partially
loaded and costs associated with recovery teams assembled from across the world. Gross operating losses did not comprehend any lost
revenue.
These losses were offset by $36 million in cumulative insurance proceeds related to property damage claims, of which $13 million
was received in 2012 and $23 million was received in 2011. Almost all of these costs and proceeds are included in COR in our
Consolidated statements of income and are recorded in Other.
In addition, we recognized $172 million in cumulative insurance proceeds through December 31, 2012, of which $135 million was
received in 2012 and $37 million was received in 2011, related to business interruption claims. These proceeds are recorded as revenue
in our Consolidated statements of income and in Other.
In the third quarter of 2012, we completed discussions with our insurers and their advisors. All claims related to these events have
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
been settled and the proceeds received.
5. Stock-based compensation
We have stock options outstanding to participants under various long-term incentive plans. We also have assumed stock options that
were granted by companies that we later acquired. Unless the options are acquisition-related replacement options, the option price
per share may not be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the grant. Substantially all the
options have a ten-year term and vest ratably over four years. Our options generally continue to vest after the option recipient retires.
We also have RSUs outstanding under long-term incentive plans. Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of TI common
stock on the vesting date, which is generally four years after the date of grant. Upon vesting, the shares are issued without payment by
the grantee. Beginning with 2013 grants, RSUs generally continue to vest after the recipient retires. Holders of most RSUs receive an
annual cash payment equal to the dividends paid on our common stock.
We have options and RSUs outstanding to non-employee directors under various director compensation plans. The plans generally
provide for annual grants of stock options and RSUs, a one-time grant of RSUs to each new non-employee director and the issuance of
TI common stock upon the distribution of stock units credited to deferred compensation accounts established for such directors.
We also have an employee stock purchase plan under which options are offered to all eligible employees in amounts based on a
percentage of the employee’s compensation, subject to a cap. Under the plan, the option price per share is 85 percent of the fair market
value on the exercise date, and options have a three-month term.
Total stock-based compensation expense recognized was as follows:
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in:
COR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R&D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SG&A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 49
67
160
11
$287
$ 48
71
127
17
$263
$ 40
58
121
50
$269
For Years Ended
December 31,
2012
2011
2013
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 1 3
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
These amounts include expense related to non-qualified stock options, RSUs and stock options offered under our employee stock
purchase plan and are net of expected forfeitures.
We issue awards of non-qualified stock options generally with graded vesting provisions (e.g., 25 percent per year for four years).
Generally, we recognize the related compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the minimum service period required for vesting
of the award, adjusting for expected forfeiture activity. Awards issued to employees who are retirement eligible or nearing retirement
eligibility are expensed on an accelerated basis.
Our RSUs generally vest four years after the date of grant. We recognize the related compensation expense on a straight-line basis
over the vesting period, adjusting for expected forfeiture activity. Beginning with 2013 grants, RSUs issued to employees who are
retirement eligible or nearing retirement eligibility are expensed on an accelerated basis.
Fair-value methods and assumptions
We account for all awards granted under our various stock-based compensation plans at fair value. We estimate the fair values for
non-qualified stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions.
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Weighted average grant date fair value, per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6.78
Weighted average assumptions used:
2013
2012
$8.31
2011
$10.37
Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected lives (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected dividend yields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
26%
7.4
1.43%
2.56%
30%
7.1
1.40%
2.10%
30%
6.9
2.61%
1.51%
We determine expected volatility on all options granted using available implied volatility rates. We believe that market-based measures
of implied volatility are currently the best available indicators of the expected volatility used in these estimates.
We determine expected lives of options based on the historical option exercise experience of our optionees using a rolling ten-year
average. We believe the historical experience method is the best estimate of future exercise patterns currently available.
Risk-free interest rates are determined using the implied yield currently available for zero-coupon U.S. government issues with a
remaining term equal to the expected life of the options.
Expected dividend yields are based on the annualized approved quarterly dividend rate and the current market price of our common
stock at the time of grant. No assumption for a future dividend rate change is included unless there is an approved plan to change the
dividend in the near term.
The fair value per share of RSUs is determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.
Our employee stock purchase plan is a discount-purchase plan and consequently the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is not
used to determine the fair value per share of these awards. The fair value per share under this plan equals the amount of the discount.
Long-term incentive and director compensation plans
Stock option and RSU transactions under our long-term incentive and director compensation plans during 2013 were as follows:
Outstanding grants, December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested RSUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited and expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding grants, December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock Options
RSUs
Shares
99,639,098
12,975,548
—
(2,176,832)
(45,507,274)
64,930,540
Weighted
Average Exercise
Price per Share
$27.73
32.84
—
30.58
27.26
$28.98
Shares
23,375,234
5,137,727
(5,741,981)
(1,878,958)
—
20,892,022
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value per
Share
$25.91
33.70
17.09
29.38
—
$29.94
The weighted average grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the years 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $33.70, $31.60 and $33.20 per
share, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the total grant date fair value of shares vested from RSU
grants was $98 million, $120 million and $155 million, respectively.
1 4 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Summarized information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2013, is as follows:
Range of
Exercise
Price
$ 9.56 to 10.00
10.01 to 20.00
20.01 to 30.00
30.01 to 40.00
40.01 to 42.66
$ 9.56 to 42.66
Number
Outstanding
(Shares)
1,177
5,270,450
20,356,470
39,294,693
7,750
64,930,540
Stock Options Outstanding
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
Life (Years)
Weighted Average
Exercise Price per
Share
0.1
5.0
4.2
6.9
9.9
5.9
$ 9.56
14.97
24.89
32.97
42.66
$ 28.98
Options Exercisable
Number
Exercisable
(Shares)
1,177
5,253,929
16,834,288
13,419,619
—
35,509,013
Weighted Average
Exercise Price per
Share
$ 9.56
14.97
25.25
32.97
n/a
$26.65
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the aggregate intrinsic value (i.e., the difference in the closing market
price on the date of exercise and the exercise price paid by the optionee) of options exercised was $427 million, $244 million and
$231 million, respectively.
Summarized information as of December 31, 2013, about outstanding stock options that are vested and expected to vest, as well as
stock options that are currently exercisable, is as follows:
Number of outstanding (shares) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average remaining contractual life (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average exercise price per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intrinsic value (millions of dollars) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
63,552,430
5.8
28.90
954
$
$
Outstanding Stock Options
(Fully Vested and
Expected to Vest) (a)
Options
Exercisable
35,509,013
4.1
26.65
613
$
$
(a) Includes effects of expected forfeitures of approximately 1 million shares. Excluding the effects of expected forfeitures, the
aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding was $969 million.
As of December 31, 2013, the total future compensation cost related to equity awards not yet recognized in the Consolidated statements
of income was $348 million, consisting of $109 million related to unvested stock options and $239 million related to unvested RSUs.
The $348 million is expected to be recognized as follows: $173 million in 2014, $119 million in 2015, $50 million in 2016 and $6 million
in 2017.
Director deferred compensation
Directors who retire or resign from the board may receive stock distributions for compensation they elected to defer. For these stock
distributions, we issued treasury shares of 12,909 in 2013, 6,592 in 2012 and 8,061 in 2011. Director deferred stock activity during
2013 was as follows:
Outstanding, December 31, 2012. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
New shares deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding, December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
129,033
13,140
(12,909)
129,264
Employee stock purchase plan
Options outstanding under the employee stock purchase plan at December 31, 2013, had an exercise price of $36.64 per share, which
is 85 percent of the fair market value of TI common stock on the date of automatic exercise. Of the total outstanding options, none were
exercisable at year-end 2013.
Director Deferred
Stock (Shares)
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 1 5
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Employee stock purchase plan transactions during 2013 were as follows:
Outstanding grants, December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding grants, December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee Stock
Purchase Plan
(Shares)
681,951
2,190,291
(2,386,834)
485,408
Exercise Price
$ 27.47
32.37
30.10
$ 36.64
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted under the employee stock purchase plans during the years 2013, 2012
and 2011 was $5.71, $4.52 and $4.59 per share, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the total
intrinsic value of options exercised under these plans was $13 million, $13 million and $10 million, respectively.
Effect on shares outstanding and treasury shares
Our current practice is to issue shares of common stock from treasury shares upon exercise of stock options, distribution of director
deferred compensation and vesting of RSUs. We settled stock option plan exercises and issued director deferred shares using treasury
shares of 47,907,017 in 2013, 25,064,951 in 2012 and 27,308,311 in 2011; and previously unissued common shares of none in 2013,
180,955 in 2012 and 390,438 in 2011. Upon vesting of RSUs, we issued treasury shares of 4,280,559 in 2013, 3,187,490 in 2012 and
3,748,623 in 2011; and previously unissued common shares of none in 2013, 4,593 in 2012, and 73,852 in 2011.
Shares available for future grants and reserved for issuance are summarized below:
Shares
Long-term Incentive
and Director
Compensation Plans
Reserved for issuance (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and RSUs . . . .
Available for future grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
146,190,489
(85,951,826)
60,238,663
Employee Stock
Purchase Plan
22,750,985
(485,408)
22,265,577
Total
168,941,474
(86,437,234)
82,504,240
As of December 31, 2013
(a) Includes 129,264 shares credited to directors’ deferred stock accounts that settle in shares of TI common stock. These shares are
not included as grants outstanding at December 31, 2013.
Effect on cash flows
Cash received from the exercise of options was $1.314 billion in 2013, $523 million in 2012 and $690 million in 2011. The related net
tax impact realized was $25 million, $56 million and $45 million, which includes excess tax benefits realized of $80 million, $38 million
and $31 million, in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
6. Profit sharing plans
Profit sharing benefits are generally formulaic and determined by one or more subsidiary or company-wide financial metrics. We pay
profit sharing benefits primarily under the company-wide TI Employee Profit Sharing Plan. This plan provides for profit sharing to be paid
based solely on TI’s operating margin for the full calendar year. Under this plan, TI must achieve a minimum threshold of 10 percent
operating margin before any profit sharing is paid. At 10 percent operating margin, profit sharing will be 2 percent of eligible payroll. The
maximum amount of profit sharing available under the plan is 20 percent of eligible payroll, which is paid only if TI’s operating margin is
at or above 35 percent for a full calendar year.
We recognized $161 million, $96 million and $143 million of profit sharing expense under the TI Employee Profit Sharing Plan in
2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
1 6 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
7. Income taxes
Income before Income Taxes
U.S.
Non-U.S.
Total
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,507
319
1,791
$1,247
1,616
1,164
$ 2,754
1,935
2,955
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
2013:
Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012:
Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011:
Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. Federal
Non-U.S.
U.S. State
Total
$ 291
17
$ 308
$(108)
65
$ (43)
$ 518
20
$ 538
$ 247
33
$ 280
$ 156
65
$ 221
$ 138
24
$ 162
$ 4
—
$ 4
$ (2)
—
$ (2)
$ 8
11
$ 19
$ 542
50
$ 592
$ 46
130
$ 176
$ 664
55
$ 719
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
To conform with current period reporting, we reclassified $571 million of 2012 prepaid taxes associated with intercompany profit
in ending inventory from Current assets: Deferred income taxes to Prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Consolidated
balance sheets.
In the Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes table above, this change resulted in a reclassification of approximately $65 million and
$174 million for 2012 and 2011, respectively, from the deferred provision to the current provision.
Principal reconciling items from income tax computed at the statutory federal rate follow:
Computed tax at statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-U.S. effective tax rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. R&D tax credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. tax benefit for manufacturing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impact of changes to uncertain tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-deductible expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013
2012
2011
$ 964
(156)
(129)
(66)
(14)
13
(20)
$ 592
$ 677
(345)
—
(158)
(88)
42
48
$ 176
$1,034
(245)
(58)
(31)
—
27
(8)
$ 719
The total provision for 2013 in the reconciliation above includes $79 million of discrete tax benefits primarily for the reinstatement of the
U.S. R&D tax credit retroactive to 2012. Included in the Non-U.S. effective tax rates reconciling item are tax benefits from tax holidays of
$40 million, $51 million and $18 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The tax benefits relate to our operations in Malaysia and
the Philippines, and expire in 2018 and 2017, respectively. The total provision for 2012 includes $252 million of discrete tax benefits
primarily for additional U.S. tax benefits for manufacturing related to the years 2000 through 2011.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 1 7
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
The primary components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
Deferred income tax assets:
Deferred loss and tax credit carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Postretirement benefit costs recognized in AOCI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories and related reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Acquisition-related intangibles and fair-value adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued retirement costs for defined benefit and retiree health care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net deferred income tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
December 31,
2013
2012
345
265
262
262
162
175
1,471
(219)
1,252
(804)
(211)
(121)
(57)
(8)
(1,201)
51
$
382
331
366
357
163
209
1,808
(221)
1,587
(921)
(243)
(102)
(131)
(11)
(1,408)
179
$
The deferred income tax assets and liabilities based on tax jurisdictions are presented on the Consolidated balance sheets as follows:
Current deferred income tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncurrent deferred income tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current deferred income tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net deferred income tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31,
2013
2012
$ 393
207
(1)
(548)
$ 51
$ 473
280
(2)
(572)
$ 179
We make an ongoing assessment regarding the realization of U.S. and non-U.S. deferred tax assets. This assessment is based on our
evaluation of relevant criteria, including the existence of deferred tax liabilities that can be used to absorb deferred tax assets, taxable
income in prior carryback years and expectations for future taxable income. In 2013, we recognized a net decrease of $2 million in our
valuation allowance, due to valuation allowances on unutilized tax credits.
We have U.S. and non-U.S. tax loss carryforwards of approximately $124 million, none of which will expire before the year 2023.
A provision has been made for deferred taxes on undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries to the extent that dividend
payments from these subsidiaries are expected to result in additional tax liability. The remaining undistributed earnings of approximately
$6.87 billion at December 31, 2013, have been indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S.; therefore, no U.S. tax provision has been
made for taxes due upon remittance of these earnings. The indefinitely reinvested earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are primarily
invested in tangible assets such as inventory and property, plant and equipment. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred
income tax liability is not practical because of the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation.
Cash payments made for income taxes, net of refunds, were $569 million, $171 million and $902 million for the years ended
December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Uncertain tax positions
We operate in a number of tax jurisdictions, and our income tax returns are subject to examination by tax authorities in those
jurisdictions who may challenge any item on these tax returns. Because the matters challenged by authorities are typically complex,
their ultimate outcome is uncertain. Before any benefit can be recorded in the financial statements, we must determine that it is “more
likely than not” that a tax position will be sustained by the appropriate tax authorities. We recognize accrued interest related to uncertain
tax positions and penalties as components of OI&E.
1 8 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
The changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions are summarized as follows:
Balance, January 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions from the acquisition of National . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reductions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlements with tax authorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expiration of the statute of limitations for assessing taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013
$ 184
7
—
19
(10)
(96)
(13)
$ 91
2012
$210
12
—
45
(92)
39
(30)
$184
Interest income (expense) recognized in the year ended December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ (10)
$ 32
Interest payable (receivable) as of December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
5
$ (8)
2011
$103
15
132
3
(39)
(4)
—
$210
$
$
1
3
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
The liability for uncertain tax positions and the interest payable are components of Deferred credits and other liabilities on our
December 31, 2013, Consolidated balance sheets.
All of the $91 million liability for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2013, are positions that, if recognized, would impact
the tax rate. If these tax liabilities are ultimately realized, $76 million of existing deferred tax assets would also be realized, related to
refunds from counterparty jurisdictions resulting from procedures for relief from double taxation. Regarding the $91 million liability:
• About $55 million of the liability represents uncertain tax positions for tax years in jurisdictions in which audit assessments have
not been made. The liability is primarily related to transfer pricing issues for which procedures for relief from double taxation will
mitigate the tax rate impact of any difference between the actual tax assessments and our estimates. The increase in the liability
for transfer pricing issues for the next 12 months is expected to be about $6 million.
• About $36 million of the liability represents audit assessments subject to ongoing procedures for relief from double taxation.
Settlement of the $36 million is subject to timely completion of the tax treaty processes and some portion of that liability may be
settled within the next 12 months. Settlement would not have a significant tax rate impact, as the tax rates of the counterparty
jurisdictions are similar.
Within the $184 million liability for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2012, are uncertain tax positions totaling $159 million
that, if recognized, would impact the tax rate. If these tax liabilities are ultimately realized, $78 million of deferred tax assets would also
be realized, primarily related to refunds from counterparty jurisdictions resulting from procedures for relief from double taxation.
As of December 31, 2013, the statute of limitations remains open for U.S. federal tax returns for 2010 and following years. Audit
activities related to our U.S. federal tax returns through 2009 have been completed except for certain pending tax treaty procedures for
relief from double taxation and the review of refunds claimed on amended returns for years prior to 2010. The procedures for relief from
double taxation pertain to U.S. federal tax returns for the years 2004 through 2009.
In non-U.S. jurisdictions, the years open to audit represent the years still open under the statute of limitations. With respect to major
jurisdictions outside the U.S., our subsidiaries are no longer subject to income tax audits for years before 2006.
8. Financial instruments and risk concentration
Financial instruments
We hold derivative financial instruments such as forward foreign currency exchange contracts and interest rate swaps, the fair value
of which was not material as of December 31, 2013. Our forward foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding as of December 31,
2013, had a notional value of $459 million to hedge our non-U.S. dollar net balance sheet exposures, including $211 million to sell
Japanese yen, $120 million to sell euros and $33 million to sell British pound sterling. Prior to the second quarter of 2013, we also held
interest rate swaps. See Note 12 for more details.
Our investments in cash equivalents, short-term investments and certain long-term investments, as well as our postretirement
plan assets and deferred compensation liabilities, are carried at fair value. The carrying values for other current financial assets and
liabilities, such as accounts receivable and accounts payable, approximate fair value due to the short maturity of such instruments. The
carrying value of our long-term debt approximates the fair value as measured using broker-dealer quotes, which are Level 2 inputs. See
Note 9 for a description of fair value and the definition of Level 2 inputs.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 1 9
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Risk concentration
Financial instruments that could subject us to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments
and accounts receivable. To manage our credit risk exposure, we place cash investments in investment-grade debt securities and limit
the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. We also limit counterparties on financial derivative contracts to financial institutions
with investment-grade ratings.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to our large number of customers and their
dispersion across different industries and geographic areas. We maintain allowances for expected returns, disputes, adjustments,
incentives and collectability. These allowances are deducted from accounts receivable on our Consolidated balance sheets.
Details of these Accounts receivable allowances are as follows:
Accounts Receivable Allowances
Balance at
Beginning of Year
Additions Charged
(Credited) to
Operating Results
Recoveries and
Write-offs, Net
Balance at
End of Year
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$31
19
18
$ (9)
12
1
$ —
—
—
$22
31
19
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
9. Valuation of debt and equity investments and certain liabilities
Debt and equity investments
We classify our investments as available for sale, trading, equity method or cost method. Most of our investments are classified as
available for sale.
Available-for-sale and trading securities are stated at fair value, which is generally based on market prices, broker quotes or, when
necessary, financial models. See fair-value discussion below. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded
as an increase or decrease, net of taxes, in AOCI on our Consolidated balance sheets. We record other-than-temporary impairments on
available-for-sale securities in OI&E in our Consolidated statements of income.
We classify certain mutual funds as trading securities. These mutual funds hold a variety of debt and equity investments intended
to generate returns that offset changes in certain deferred compensation liabilities. We record changes in the fair value of these mutual
funds and the related deferred compensation liabilities in SG&A.
Our other investments are not measured at fair value but are accounted for using either the equity method or cost method. These
investments consist of interests in venture capital funds and other non-marketable equity securities. Gains and losses from equity-method
investments are reflected in OI&E based on our ownership share of the investee’s financial results. Gains and losses on cost-method
investments are recorded in OI&E when realized or when an impairment of the investment’s value is warranted based on our assessment
of the recoverability of each investment.
Details of our investments are as follows:
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
Cash and
Cash
Equivalents
Short-term
Investments
Long-term
Investments
Cash and
Cash
Equivalents
Short-term
Investments
Long-term
Investments
Measured at fair value:
Available-for-sale securities
Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. Government agency and Treasury securities . . .
$ 500
123
787
Trading securities
Mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
1,410
Other measurement basis:
Equity-method investments . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost-method investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash on hand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
217
$ 1,627
$ —
217
1,985
—
2,202
—
—
—
$ 2,202
$ —
—
—
179
179
24
13
—
$ 216
$ 211
188
795
$ —
325
2,224
—
1,194
—
2,549
—
—
222
$ 1,416
—
—
—
$ 2,549
$ —
—
—
159
159
34
22
—
$ 215
2 0 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had no significant unrealized gains or losses associated with our available-for-sale investments.
We did not recognize any credit losses related to available-for-sale investments for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
During the third quarter of 2012, we sold all of our remaining investments in auction-rate securities.
For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the proceeds from sales, redemptions and maturities of short-term
available-for-sale investments were $4.25 billion, $2.20 billion and $3.55 billion, respectively. Gross realized gains and losses from
these sales were not significant.
The following table presents the aggregate maturities of investments in debt securities classified as available for sale at
December 31, 2013:
Due
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
Fair Value
One year or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One to three years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 3,472
140
Gross realized gains and losses from sales of long-term investments were not significant for 2013, 2012 or 2011. Other-than-temporary
declines and impairments in the values of these investments recognized in OI&E were $5 million, $7 million and $2 million in 2013,
2012 and 2011, respectively.
Fair-value considerations
We measure and report certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset
or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
The three-level hierarchy discussed below indicates the extent and level of judgment used to estimate fair-value measurements.
Level 1 – Uses unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2 – Uses inputs other than Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date through correlation
with market data, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and quoted prices in markets
that are not active. Level 2 also includes assets and liabilities that are valued using models or other pricing methodologies
that do not require significant judgment since the input assumptions used in the models, such as interest rates and
volatility factors, are corroborated by readily observable data. Our Level 2 assets consist of corporate obligations and
some U.S. government agency and Treasury securities. We utilize a third-party data service to provide Level 2 valuations.
We verify these valuations for reasonableness relative to unadjusted quotes obtained from brokers or dealers based on
observable prices for similar assets in active markets.
Level 3 – Uses inputs that are unobservable, supported by little or no market activity and reflect the use of significant management
judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models that utilize management estimates of market
participant assumptions.
The following are our assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.
We had no Level 3 assets or liabilities as of December 31, 2013 or 2012. These tables do not include cash on hand, assets held by our
postretirement plans, or assets and liabilities that are measured at historical cost or any basis other than fair value.
Fair Value
December 31, 2013
Level 1
Level 2
Assets
Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. Government agency and Treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 500
340
2,772
179
$ 3,791
$ 500
—
2,107
179
$ 2,786
$ —
340
665
—
$ 1,005
Liabilities
Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 197
$ 197
$ 197
$ 197
$ —
$ —
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 2 1
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Fair Value
December 31, 2012
Level 1
Level 2
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Assets
Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. Government agency and Treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 211
513
3,019
159
$ 3,902
$ 211
—
1,145
159
$ 1,515
$ —
513
1,874
—
$ 2,387
Liabilities
Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 174
$ 174
$ 174
$ 174
$ —
$ —
The following table summarizes the change in the fair values for Level 3 assets, reflecting the sale of our remaining investments in
auction-rate securities in the third quarter of 2012:
Level 3
Auction-rate
Securities
Balance, December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $134
13
Change in unrealized loss – included in AOCI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(84)
Redemptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(63)
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ —
Balance, September 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. Goodwill and acquisition-related intangibles
The following table summarizes the changes in goodwill by segment for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
Goodwill, December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment during 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill, December 31, 2012 and 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Analog
$4,158
—
$4,158
Embedded
Processing
$172
—
$172
Other
$122
(90)
$ 32
Total
$4,452
(90)
$4,362
We performed our annual goodwill impairment test as of October 1, 2013, and determined the fair value of each of our reporting
units was in excess of its carrying value. Determination of fair value was based upon management estimates and judgment, using
unobservable inputs in discounted cash flow models to calculate the fair value of each reporting unit. These unobservable inputs
are considered Level 3 measurements. In conjunction with the restructuring action related to the Embedded Processing segment as
discussed in Note 3, we performed an interim qualitative assessment of its goodwill in the fourth quarter of 2013. As a result, we
determined no impairment was indicated.
In November 2012, as a result of unsuccessful efforts to divest certain Wireless product lines and the subsequent decision to
restructure and wind down those product lines, we reassessed the recoverability of the goodwill associated with the former Wireless
segment. We determined its fair value, using a discounted cash flow analysis, was less than the carrying amount and, therefore,
performed the required second step of the impairment analysis to determine the amount of the impairment charge. We deducted the
fair value of the former Wireless segment from the total of the estimated fair values of the segment’s identifiable assets and liabilities,
including intangible assets with no carrying value. This calculation resulted in an implied negative fair value of goodwill. As a result,
we recognized a non-cash, non-tax deductible impairment charge of $90 million for all the associated goodwill of the former Wireless
segment. We recognized this impairment in Restructuring charges/other in the Consolidated statements of income, as discussed in
Note 3. There was no impairment of goodwill during 2011 or 2013. As of December 31, 2013, the accumulated impairment of goodwill
was $90 million.
2 2 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
The components of acquisition-related intangible assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, are as follows:
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
Amortization
Period
(Years)
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Acquisition-related intangibles:
Developed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In-process R&D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 - 10
5 - 8
5
(a)
$ 2,157
821
5
8
$ 2,991
$ 526
239
3
n/a
$ 768
$ 1,631
582
2
8
$ 2,223
Gross
Carrying
Amount
$ 2,145
821
46
31
$ 3,043
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
$ 312
137
36
n/a
$ 485
$ 1,833
684
10
31
$ 2,558
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
(a) In-process R&D is not amortized until the associated project has been completed. Alternatively, if the associated project is
determined not to be viable, it is expensed.
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles was $336 million, $342 million and $111 million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively,
primarily related to developed technology. Fully amortized assets are written off against accumulated amortization. Future estimated
amortization of acquisition-related intangibles for the years ended December 31 is as follows:
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 321
319
319
318
318
628
11. Postretirement benefit plans
Plan descriptions
We have various employee retirement plans including defined benefit, defined contribution and retiree health care benefit plans. For
qualifying employees, we offer deferred compensation arrangements.
U.S. retirement plans:
Our principal retirement plans in the U.S. are qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans, all of which were closed to new
participants after November 1997; a defined contribution plan; and an enhanced defined contribution plan. The defined benefit pension
plans include employees still accruing benefits as well as employees and participants who no longer accrue service-related benefits, but
instead, may participate in the enhanced defined contribution plan.
Both defined contribution plans offer an employer-matching savings option that allows employees to make pre-tax contributions to
various investment choices, including a TI common stock fund. Employees who elected to continue accruing a benefit in the qualified
defined benefit pension plans may also participate in the defined contribution plan, where employer-matching contributions are
provided for up to 2 percent of the employee’s annual eligible earnings. Employees who elected not to continue accruing a benefit in
the defined benefit pension plans, and employees hired after November 1997 and through December 31, 2003, may participate in the
enhanced defined contribution plan. This plan provides for a fixed employer contribution of 2 percent of the employee’s annual eligible
earnings, plus an employer-matching contribution of up to 4 percent of the employee’s annual eligible earnings. Employees hired after
December 31, 2003, do not receive the fixed employer contribution of 2 percent of the employee’s annual eligible earnings.
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, as a result of employees’ elections, TI’s U.S. defined contribution plans held shares of TI common
stock totaling 15 million shares and 20 million shares valued at $678 million and $610 million, respectively. Dividends paid on these
shares for 2013 and 2012 were $18 million and $16 million, respectively.
Our aggregate expense for the U.S. defined contribution plans was $62 million in 2013, $70 million in 2012 and $55 million in 2011.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 2 3
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Benefits under the qualified defined benefit pension plan are determined using a formula based upon years of service and
the highest five consecutive years of compensation. We intend to contribute amounts to this plan to meet the minimum funding
requirements of applicable local laws and regulations, plus such additional amounts as we deem appropriate. The non-qualified defined
benefit plans are unfunded and closed to new participants.
U.S. retiree health care benefit plan:
U.S. employees who meet eligibility requirements are offered medical coverage during retirement. We make a contribution toward the
cost of those retiree medical benefits for certain retirees and their dependents. The contribution rates are based upon various factors,
the most important of which are an employee’s date of hire, date of retirement, years of service and eligibility for Medicare benefits. The
balance of the cost is borne by the plan’s participants. Employees hired after January 1, 2001, are responsible for the full cost of their
medical benefits during retirement.
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Non-U.S. retirement plans:
We provide retirement coverage for non-U.S. employees, as required by local laws or to the extent we deem appropriate, through a
number of defined benefit and defined contribution plans. Retirement benefits are generally based on an employee’s years of service
and compensation. Funding requirements are determined on an individual country and plan basis and are subject to local country
practices and market circumstances.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, as a result of employees’ elections, TI’s non-U.S. defined contribution plans held TI common
stock valued at $15 million and $13 million, respectively. Dividends paid on these shares of TI common stock for 2013 and 2012 were
not material.
Effect on the statements of income and balance sheets
Expense related to defined benefit and retiree health care benefit plans was as follows:
U.S. Defined Benefit
2012
2011
2013
U.S. Retiree Health Care
2012
2011
2013
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) . . . . . . .
Recognized net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net periodic benefit costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlement losses (a) (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Curtailment losses (gains) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special termination benefit losses (gains) (b) . . . . .
Total, including other postretirement losses (gains) . .
$ 26
45
(48)
1
21
45
41
—
—
$ 86
$ 24
44
(50)
1
16
35
—
—
(1)
$ 34
$ 22
46
(45)
1
23
47
—
—
4
$ 51
$
5
20
(24)
4
11
16
—
—
—
$ 16
$
5
25
(23)
3
13
23
$
4
25
(21)
2
13
23
—
(1)
—
$ 22
—
5
—
$ 28
Non-U.S. Defined Benefit
2011
2012
2013
$ 41
61
(67)
(3)
31
63
4
(7)
—
$ 60
$
45
75
(78)
(4)
41
79
193
—
(337)
$ (65)
$ 41
69
(83)
(4)
40
63
—
2
—
$ 65
(a) Includes non-restructuring- and restructuring-related settlement losses.
(b) Transfer of Japan substitutional pension in 2012: In Japan, we maintain employee pension fund plans (EPFs) pursuant to the Japanese
Welfare Pension Insurance Law (JWPIL). An EPF consists of two portions: a substitutional portion based on JWPIL-determined
minimum old-age pension benefits similar to Social Security benefits in the United States and a corporate portion established at the
discretion of each employer. Employers and employees are exempt from contributing to the Japanese Pension Insurance (JPI) if the
substitutional portion is funded by an EPF.
The JWPIL was amended to permit each EPF to separate the substitutional portion and transfer those obligations and related assets
to the government of Japan. After such a transfer, the employer is required to contribute periodically to JPI, and the government of
Japan is responsible for future benefit payments relating to the substitutional portion.
During the third quarter of 2012, our EPF received final approval for such a separation and transferred the obligations and assets
of its substitutional portion to the government of Japan. On a pre-tax basis, this resulted in a net gain of $144 million recorded in
Restructuring charges/other on our Consolidated statements of income and included in Other, as shown in Note 3. This net gain of
$144 million consisted of two parts – a gain of $337 million, representing the difference between the fair values of the obligations
settled of $533 million and the assets transferred from the pension trust to the government of Japan of $196 million, offset by a
settlement loss of $193 million related to the recognition of previously unrecognized actuarial losses included in AOCI.
For the U.S. qualified pension and retiree health care plans, the expected return on plan assets component of net periodic benefit cost is
based upon a market-related value of assets. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the market-related value of assets is the fair value adjusted
by a smoothing technique whereby certain gains and losses are phased in over a period of three years.
2 4 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
Changes in the benefit obligations and plan assets for the defined benefit and retiree health care benefit plans were as follows:
U.S. Defined
Benefit
U.S. Retiree
Health Care
2013
2012
2013
2012
Non-U.S.
Defined Benefit
2012
2013
Change in plan benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,098
26
45
—
(9)
—
(27)
(178)
—
—
—
—
—
Benefit obligation at end of year (BO) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 955
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Participant contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Medicare subsidy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial (gain) loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Curtailments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special termination benefit losses (gains) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plan amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effects of exchange rate changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 959
$509
24
5
44
20
—
18
(45)
(47)
—
3
116
(36)
—
—
1
—
(1) —
—
—
—
—
—
—
$1,098
$472
$521
5
25
17
(47)
5
(17)
—
(1)
—
1
—
—
$509
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,071
1
43
13
—
(9)
(178)
—
—
Fair value of plan assets at end of year (FVPA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 941
Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employer contributions (funding of qualified plans) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employer contributions (payments for non-qualified plans) . . . . . . . .
Participant contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effects of exchange rate changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$431
$ 914
$517
37
95
41
78
104
—
—
3
—
17
—
18
(46)
(45)
(45)
—
—
—
—
—
—
— (46) —
$517
$485
$1,071
$2,414
41
61
1
(81)
—
96
(30)
(28)
—
—
(237)
39
$2,276
$2,218
201
62
—
1
(81)
(30)
(232)
40
$2,179
$2,748
45
75
1
(83)
—
222
(533)
—
—
—
(61)
—
$2,414
$2,211
207
134
—
1
(83)
(196)
(56)
—
$2,218
Funded status (FVPA – BO) at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (14) $
(27) $ 13
$
8
$ (97) $ (196)
Amounts recognized on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2013, were as follows:
U.S. Defined
Benefit
U.S. Retiree
Health Care
Overfunded retirement plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Underfunded retirement plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Funded status (FVPA – BO) at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 44
(7)
(51)
$ (14)
$ 16
—
(3)
$ 13
Amounts recognized on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2012, were as follows:
Overfunded retirement plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Underfunded retirement plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Funded status (FVPA – BO) at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 34
(8)
(53)
$(27)
$ 12
—
(4)
$ 8
U.S. Defined
Benefit
U.S. Retiree
Health Care
Non-U.S.
Defined
Benefit
$ 70
(5)
(162)
$ (97)
Total
$ 130
(12)
(216)
$ (98)
Non-U.S.
Defined
Benefit
$ 22
(6)
(212)
$(196)
Total
$ 68
(14)
(269)
$(215)
Contributions to the plans meet or exceed all minimum funding requirements. We expect to contribute about $50 million to our
retirement benefit plans in 2014. The amounts shown for underfunded U.S. defined benefit plans were for non-qualified pension plans.
We do not fund these non-qualified plans because contributions to them are not tax deductible until the benefit is actually paid to the
employee. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the unfunded benefit obligations of the U.S. non-qualified plans were $58 million and
$61 million, respectively.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 2 5
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Accumulated benefit obligations, which are generally less than the projected benefit obligations as they exclude the impact of future
salary increases, were $882 million and $1.01 billion at year-end 2013 and 2012, respectively, for the U.S. defined benefit plans, and
$2.12 billion and $2.23 billion at year-end 2013 and 2012, respectively, for the non-U.S. defined benefit plans.
The amounts recorded in AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, are detailed below by plan type:
U.S. Defined
Benefit
Net
Actuarial
Loss
Prior
Service
Cost
U.S. Retiree
Health Care
Net
Actuarial
Loss
Prior
Service
Cost
Non-U.S.
Defined Benefit
Net
Actuarial
Loss
Prior
Service
Cost
Total
Net
Actuarial
Loss
Prior
Service
Cost
AOCI balance, December 31, 2012, net of taxes . . . .
$ 176
$ (1)
$ 112
$ 13
$ 413
$(19)
$ 701
$(7)
Changes in AOCI by category in 2013:
Adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassification to Net income . . . . . . . . . .
Tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total change to AOCI in 2013 . . . . . . . . . . .
AOCI balance, December 31, 2013, net of taxes . . .
20
(62)
15
(27)
$ 149
—
(1)
—
(1)
$ (2)
(53)
(11)
23
(41)
$ 71
—
(4)
1
(3)
$ 10
(132)
(35)
59
(108)
$ 305
4
10
(4)
10
$ (9)
(165)
(108)
97
(176)
$ 525
4
5
(3)
6
$(1)
The estimated amounts of net actuarial loss and unrecognized prior service cost (credit) included in AOCI as of December 31, 2013, that
are expected to be amortized into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are: $26 million and $1 million for the U.S. defined
benefit plans; $7 million and $4 million for the U.S. retiree health care plan; and $26 million and ($2) million for the non-U.S. defined
benefit plans.
Information on plan assets
We report and measure the plan assets of our defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans at fair value. The tables below
set forth the fair value of our plan assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, using the same three-level hierarchy of fair-value inputs
described in Note 9.
Fair Value
December 31, 2013
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets of U.S. defined benefit plan
Money market collective trusts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. Government agency and Treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. equity funds and option collars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Limited partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets of U.S. retiree health care plan
Money market collective trusts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. equity funds and option collars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets of non-U.S. defined benefit plans
Cash and money market collective trusts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Local market bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International/global bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Local market equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International/global equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
27
208
372
217
80
37
$ 941
$
45
193
176
71
$ 485
$
46
1,065
410
114
536
8
$ 2,179
2 6 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
$ — $
—
—
—
—
—
27
$ —
208 —
372 —
217 —
80 —
— 37
$ 37
$ — $ 904
$ — $
$ —
45
— —
176 —
71 —
$ —
$ 292
$
2
$ —
712 —
410 —
108 —
536 —
8
—
$ 8
$ 1,768
193
—
—
$ 193
$ 44
353
—
6
—
—
$ 403
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Fair Value
December 31, 2012
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets of U.S. defined benefit plan
Money market collective trusts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. Government agency and Treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. equity funds and option collars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Limited partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets of U.S. retiree health care plan
Money market collective trusts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. equity funds and option collars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets of non-U.S. defined benefit plans
Cash and money market collective trusts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Local market bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International/global bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Local market equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International/global equity funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 119
247
368
219
81
37
$1,071
$
49
205
197
66
$ 517
$ 133
942
343
204
564
32
$2,218
$ — $ 119
$ —
247 —
368 —
219 —
81 —
— 37
$ 37
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
$ — $1,034
$ — $
49
$ —
— —
151 —
66 —
$ —
$ 266
—
—
—
—
—
205
46
—
$251
$ 88
183
19
20
—
—
$310
$
$ —
45
759 —
324 —
184 —
564 —
19
13
$ 19
$1,889
The investments in our major benefit plans largely consist of low-cost, broad-market index funds to mitigate risks of concentration
within market sectors. Our investment policy is designed to better match the interest rate sensitivity of the plan assets and liabilities.
The appropriate mix of equity and bond investments is determined primarily through the use of detailed asset-liability modeling studies
that look to balance the impact of changes in the discount rate against the need to provide asset growth to cover future service cost.
Most of our plans around the world have a greater proportion of fixed income securities with return characteristics that are more closely
aligned with changes in the liabilities caused by discount rate volatility. For the U.S. plans, we utilize an option collar strategy to reduce
the volatility of returns on investments in U.S. equity funds.
The only Level 3 assets in our worldwide benefit plans are certain private equity limited partnerships in our U.S. pension plan and a
diversified property fund in a non-U.S. pension plan. These investments are valued using inputs from the fund managers and internal
models. The following table summarizes the change in the fair values for Level 3 plan assets for the years ending December 31, 2013
and 2012:
Balance, December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Redemptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Redemptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 35
(2)
4
37
—
—
$ 37
$ 18
—
1
19
(10)
(1)
8
$
Level 3 Plan Assets
U.S.
Defined
Benefit
Non-U.S.
Defined
Benefit
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 2 7
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Assumptions and investment policies
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:
U.S. discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.11% 4.16% 4.83% 3.97%
Non-U.S. discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.01% 2.80%
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
U.S. average long-term pay progression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.50% 3.50%
Non-U.S. average long-term pay progression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.11% 3.10%
Defined Benefit
2012
2013
U.S. Retiree
Health Care
2013
2012
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
U.S. discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.59% 4.92% 3.94% 4.86%
Non-U.S. discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.74% 2.88%
U.S. long-term rate of return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.25% 6.00% 4.75% 5.50%
Non-U.S. long-term rate of return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.34% 3.83%
U.S. average long-term pay progression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.60% 3.50%
Non-U.S. average long-term pay progression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.01% 3.17%
We utilize a variety of methods to select an appropriate discount rate depending on the depth of the corporate bond market in the
country in which the benefit plan operates. In the U.S., we use a settlement approach whereby a portfolio of bonds is selected from the
universe of actively traded high-quality U.S. corporate bonds. The selected portfolio is designed to provide cash flows sufficient to pay
the plan’s expected benefit payments when due. The resulting discount rate reflects the rate of return of the selected portfolio of bonds.
For our non-U.S. locations with a sufficient number of actively traded high-quality bonds, an analysis is performed in which the projected
cash flows from the defined benefit plans are discounted against a yield curve constructed with an appropriate universe of high-quality
corporate bonds available in each country. In this manner, a present value is developed. The discount rate selected is the single
equivalent rate that produces the same present value. Both the settlement approach and the yield curve approach produce a discount
rate that recognizes each plan’s distinct liability characteristics. For countries that lack a sufficient corporate bond market, a government
bond index adjusted for an appropriate risk premium is used to establish the discount rate.
Assumptions for the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets are based on future expectations for returns for each asset
class and the effect of periodic target asset allocation rebalancing. We adjust the results for the payment of reasonable expenses
of the plan from plan assets. We believe our assumptions are appropriate based on the investment mix and long-term nature of the
plans’ investments. Assumptions used for the non-U.S. defined benefit plans reflect the different economic environments within the
various countries.
The table below shows target allocation ranges for the plans that hold a substantial majority of the defined benefit assets.
Asset Category
U.S. Defined
Benefit
U.S. Retiree
Health Care
Non-U.S.
Defined Benefit
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed income securities and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
35%
65%
50%
50%
0% - 40%
60% - 100%
We intend to rebalance the plans’ investments when they are not within the target allocation ranges. Additional contributions are
invested consistent with the target ranges and may be used to rebalance the portfolio. The investment allocations and individual
investments are chosen with regard to the duration of the obligations of each plan. About half of the assets in the retiree health care
benefit plan are invested in a series of Voluntary Employee Benefit Association trusts.
Weighted average asset allocations as of December 31, are as follows:
Asset Category
2013
2012
2013
2012
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed income securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
35% 31%
62% 58%
3% 11%
51% 51%
40% 40%
9%
9%
2013
30%
68%
2%
2012
36%
58%
6%
U.S. Defined
Benefit
U.S. Retiree
Health Care
Non-U.S.
Defined Benefit
2 8 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
None of the plan assets related to the defined benefit pension plans and retiree health care benefit plan are directly invested in TI
common stock. As of December 31, 2013, we do not expect to return any of the defined benefit pension plans’ assets to TI in the next
12 months.
The following table shows the benefits we expect to pay to participants from the plans in the next ten years. Almost all of the
payments will be made from plan assets and not from company assets.
U.S. Defined
Benefit
U.S. Retiree
Health Care
Medicare
Subsidy
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 - 2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$208
102
105
104
101
421
$ 36
37
39
40
41
196
$ (4)
(4)
(4)
(5)
(5)
(13)
Assumed health care cost trend rates for the U.S. retiree health care plan at December 31 are as follows:
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
Non-U.S.
Defined
Benefit
$ 81
84
86
91
94
521
2013
2012
Assumed health care cost trend rate for next year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.0% 7.0%
Ultimate trend rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0% 5.0%
2018
Year in which ultimate trend rate is reached . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022
A one percentage point increase or decrease in health care cost trend rates over all future periods would have increased or decreased
the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for the U.S. retiree health care plan at December 31, 2013, by $22 million or
$18 million, respectively. The service cost and interest cost components of 2013 plan expense would have increased or decreased by
$2 million or $1 million, respectively.
Deferred compensation arrangements
We have a deferred compensation plan that allows U.S. employees whose base salary and management responsibility exceed a certain
level to defer receipt of a portion of their cash compensation. Payments under this plan are made based on the participant’s distribution
election and plan balance. Participants can earn a return on their deferred compensation based on notional investments in the same
investment funds that are offered in our defined contribution plans. In connection with the National acquisition, we assumed its deferred
compensation plan, consisting of obligations and matching assets held in a Rabbi trust.
As of December 31, 2013, our liability to participants of the deferred compensation plans was $197 million and is recorded in
Deferred credits and other liabilities on our Consolidated balance sheets. This amount reflects the accumulated participant deferrals
and earnings thereon as of that date. Except for the Rabbi trust assets of $37 million, no other assets are held in trust for the deferred
compensation plans and so we remain liable to the participants. To serve as an economic hedge against changes in fair values of this
liability, we invest in similar mutual funds that are recorded in Long-term investments. We record changes in the fair value of the liability
and the related investment in SG&A as discussed in Note 9.
12. Debt and lines of credit
Short-term borrowings
We maintain a line of credit to support commercial paper borrowings, if any, and to provide additional liquidity through bank loans.
As of December 31, 2013, we had a variable-rate revolving credit facility from a consortium of investment-grade banks that allows
us to borrow up to $2 billion through March 2018. The interest rate on borrowings under this credit facility, if drawn, is indexed to the
applicable London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). As of December 31, 2013, our credit facility was undrawn and we had no commercial
paper outstanding.
Long-term debt
In May 2013, we issued an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion of fixed-rate long-term debt, with $500 million due in 2018 and
$500 million due in 2023. We also incurred $6 million of issuance and other related costs that are being amortized to Interest and debt
expense over the term of the debt. The proceeds of the offering were $986 million, net of the original issuance discount and were used
toward the repayment of $1.5 billion of maturing debt, including floating-rate notes. In connection with this repayment, we settled a
floating-to-fixed interest rate swap, associated with the maturing debt.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 2 9
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
In August 2012, we issued an aggregate principal amount of $1.5 billion of fixed-rate long-term debt, with $750 million due in 2015
and $750 million due in 2019. The proceeds of the offering were $1.492 billion, net of the original issuance discount. We also incurred
$7 million of issuance and other related costs that are being amortized to Interest and debt expense over the term of the debt.
Long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Floating-rate notes due 2013 (swapped to a 0.922% fixed rate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes due 2013 at 0.875% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes due 2014 at 1.375% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes due 2015 at 3.95% (assumed with National acquisition) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes due 2015 at 0.45% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes due 2016 at 2.375% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes due 2017 at 6.60% (assumed with National acquisition) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes due 2018 at 1.00% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes due 2019 at 1.65% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes due 2023 at 2.25% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net unamortized premium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31,
2013
2012
$ — $ 1,000
500
1,000
250
750
1,000
375
—
750
—
5,625
61
(1,500)
$ 4,186
—
1,000
250
750
1,000
375
500
750
500
5,125
33
(1,000)
$ 4,158
Interest and debt expense was $95 million in 2013, $85 million in 2012 and $42 million in 2011. This was net of the amortization of the
debt premium and other debt issuance costs. Cash payments for interest on long-term debt were $102 million in 2013, $97 million in
2012 and $54 million in 2011. Capitalized interest was not material.
13. Commitments and contingencies
Operating leases
We conduct certain operations in leased facilities and also lease a portion of our data processing and other equipment. In addition,
certain long-term supply agreements to purchase industrial gases are accounted for as operating leases. Lease agreements frequently
include purchase and renewal provisions and require us to pay taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. Rental and lease expense
incurred was $120 million, $124 million and $109 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Capitalized software licenses
We have licenses for certain internal-use electronic design automation software that we account for as capital leases. The related
liabilities are apportioned between Accounts payable and Deferred credits and other liabilities on our Consolidated balance sheets,
depending on the contractual timing of payments.
Purchase commitments
Some of our purchase commitments entered in the ordinary course of business provide for minimum payments.
As of December 31, 2013, we had committed to make the following minimum payments under our non-cancellable operating leases,
capitalized software licenses and purchase commitments:
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 96
81
60
44
32
100
$ 44
43
26
—
—
—
$102
46
31
24
8
22
Operating
Leases
Capitalized
Software
Licenses
Purchase
Commitments
3 0 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Indemnification guarantees
We routinely sell products with an intellectual property indemnification included in the terms of sale. Historically, we have had only
minimal, infrequent losses associated with these indemnities. Consequently, we cannot reasonably estimate or accrue for any future
liabilities that may result.
Warranty costs/product liabilities
We accrue for known product-related claims if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. During the periods presented, there
have been no material accruals or payments regarding product warranty or product liability. Historically, we have experienced a low
rate of payments on product claims. Although we cannot predict the likelihood or amount of any future claims, we do not believe they
will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Consistent with general industry practice,
we enter into formal contracts with certain customers that include negotiated warranty remedies. Typically, under these agreements
our warranty for semiconductor products includes three years of coverage; an obligation to repair, replace or refund; and a maximum
payment obligation tied to the price paid for our products. In some cases, product claims may exceed the price of our products.
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
General
We are subject to various legal and administrative proceedings. Although it is not possible to predict the outcome of these matters, we
believe that the results of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or
liquidity. From time to time, we also negotiate contingent consideration payment arrangements associated with certain acquisitions,
which are recorded at fair value.
Discontinued operations indemnity
In connection with the 2006 sale of the former Sensors & Controls (S&C) business, we have agreed to indemnify Sensata Technologies,
Inc., for specified litigation matters and certain liabilities, including environmental liabilities. In a settlement with a third party, we
have agreed to indemnify that party for certain events relating to S&C products, which events we consider remote. We believe our
total remaining potential exposure from both of these indemnities will not exceed $200 million. As of December 31, 2013, we believe
future payments related to these indemnity obligations will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
14. Stockholders’ equity
We are authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. No preferred stock is currently outstanding.
Treasury shares acquired in connection with the board-authorized stock repurchase program in 2013, 2012 and 2011 were
77,564,013 shares, 59,757,780 shares and 59,466,168 shares, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, $6.0 billion of stock repurchase
authorizations remain, and no expiration date has been specified.
15. Supplemental financial information
Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gains on investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax interest income (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013
$ 10
18
(10)
(1)
$ 17
2012
$ 8
18
32
(11)
$ 47
2011
$ 11
6
1
(13)
$ 5
(a) Includes lease income of approximately $15 million per year, primarily from the purchaser of a former business. As of
December 31, 2013, the aggregate amount of non-cancellable future lease payments to be received from these leases is $54 million.
These leases contain renewal options. Other also includes miscellaneous non-operational items such as losses related to former
businesses, including settlements in 2012 and 2011; gains and losses from currency exchange rate changes; and gains and losses
from our derivative financial instruments, primarily forward foreign currency exchange contracts.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid taxes on intercompany inventory profits (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other prepaid expenses and current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31,
2013
$667
196
$863
2012
$571
234
$805
(a) See Note 7 for additional details.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 3 1
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Property, Plant and Equipment at Cost
Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciable
Lives (Years)
—
5 - 40
3 - 10
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
December 31,
2013
2012
$ 175
2,913
3,468
$6,556
$ 189
3,006
3,696
$ 6,891
December 31,
2013
2012
Severance and related expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $158
Customer incentive programs and allowances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
143
Property and other non-income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
108
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
242
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$651
$ 217
213
127
324
$ 881
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Taxes
Postretirement benefit plans:
December 31,
2013
2012
Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net prior service credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash flow hedge derivative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$(525)
1
(4)
$(528)
$(701)
7
(5)
$(699)
Details on amounts reclassified out of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes to Net income
In conformance with ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income, the table below details where reclassifications out of AOCI are recorded on the Consolidated statements
of income.
Details about AOCI Components
Net actuarial gains (losses) of defined benefit plans (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefit (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassification to Net income, net of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prior service cost of defined benefit plans (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefit (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassification to Net income, net of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative instrument . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefit (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassification to Net income, net of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013
Related Statement of Income Line
$ 108
(37)
$ 71
$ (5)
2
$ (3)
$
$
2
(1)
1
Pension expense (b)
Provision for income taxes
Net income
Pension expense (b)
Provision for income taxes
Net income
Interest and debt expense
Provision for income taxes
Net income
(a) Equals the sum of Recognized net actuarial loss and Settlement losses, as detailed in Note 11.
(b) Pension expense is included in the computation of total employee benefit cost, which is allocated to COR, R&D, SG&A and
Restructuring charges/other in the Consolidated statements of income.
(c) Equals the sum of Amortization of prior service cost (credit) and Curtailment losses (gains), as detailed in Note 11.
3 2 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
16. Segment and geographic area data
Reportable segments
Our financial reporting structure is comprised of two reportable segments: Analog and Embedded Processing. These reportable
segments represent groups of similar products that are combined on the basis of similar design and development requirements, product
characteristics, manufacturing processes and distribution channels. A summary of each reportable segment follows:
• Analog – Analog semiconductors change real-world signals – such as sound, temperature, pressure or images – by conditioning
them, amplifying them and often converting them to a stream of digital data that can be processed by other semiconductors,
such as embedded processors. Analog semiconductors are also used to manage power in every electronic device, whether
plugged into a wall or running off a battery. Analog includes the following major product lines: HVAL, Power, HPA and SVA.
• Embedded Processing – Embedded Processing products are the “brains” of many electronic devices. Compared with general
purpose microprocessors that perform many different tasks, embedded processors are designed to handle specific tasks and
can be optimized for various combinations of performance, power and cost, depending on the application. The devices vary from
simple, low-cost products used in electric toothbrushes to highly specialized, complex devices used in wireless basestation
communications infrastructure equipment. Embedded Processing includes the following major product lines: Processors,
Microcontrollers and Connectivity.
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
Other
Other includes other operating segments that neither meet the quantitative thresholds for individually reportable segments nor are
they aggregated with other operating segments. These operating segments primarily include our smaller product lines, such as DLP®
products, primarily used in projectors to create high-definition images; certain custom semiconductors known as application-specific
integrated circuits (ASICs); and calculators. Additionally, Other includes royalties received for our patented technology that we license
to other electronics companies and revenue from transitional supply agreements related to acquisitions and divestitures. We also
include revenue and associated costs from our legacy wireless products, which were part of our former Wireless segment. The Wireless
segment was eliminated effective January 1, 2013. To conform to this revised reporting structure, we filed a Form 8-K on May 3, 2013,
to recast prior period segment information presented in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
We also include in Other restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related charges, as these charges are not used in evaluating
the results of or in allocating resources to our segments. Acquisition-related charges include certain fair-value adjustments, restructuring
charges, transaction expenses, acquisition-related retention bonuses and amortization of intangible assets. Other also includes certain
corporate-level items, such as litigation expenses, environmental costs and insurance proceeds. Except for these items, we allocate all
of our expenses associated with corporate activities to our operating segments based on specific methodologies, such as percentage of
operating expenses or headcount.
We use centralized manufacturing and support organizations, such as facilities, procurement and logistics, to provide products and
support to our operating segments. Costs incurred by these organizations, including depreciation, are charged to the segments on a
per-unit basis. Consequently, depreciation expense is not an independently identifiable component within the segments’ results and,
therefore, is not provided. The assets and liabilities associated with our centralized operations are carried in Other.
With the exception of goodwill, we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment, nor does the chief operating decision
maker evaluate operating segments using discrete asset information. There was no significant intersegment revenue. The accounting
policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
Segment information
Revenue
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating profit
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Analog
Embedded
Processing
Other
Total
$ 7,194
6,998
6,375
$ 1,859
1,650
1,693
$2,450
2,257
2,381
$ 185
158
387
$ 2,561 $12,205
12,825
13,735
3,570
4,979
$ 788 $ 2,832
1,973
2,992
165
912
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 3 3
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Geographic area information
The following geographic area data include revenue, based on product shipment destination and royalty payor location, and property,
plant and equipment, based on physical location:
U.S.
Asia (a)
Europe
Japan
Rest of
World
Total
Revenue
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,666 $ 7,370 $ 1,926 $ 1,072
1,357
1,462
7,808
8,619
1,596
1,468
1,861
1,822
$ 1,765 $ 1,277 $ 196 $ 144
174
228
1,931
2,159
1,547
1,739
241
276
$ 171
203
364
$ 17
19
26
$12,205
12,825
13,735
$ 3,399
3,912
4,428
(a) Revenue from products shipped into China, including Hong Kong, was $5.2 billion in 2013, $5.4 billion in 2012 and $5.8 billion
in 2011.
Major customer
No customer accounts for 10 percent or more of 2013 or 2012 revenue. Sales to the Nokia group of companies, including sales to
indirect contract manufacturers, accounted for 13 percent of our 2011 revenue. Revenue from sales to Nokia is reflected primarily
in Other.
3 4 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Texas Instruments Incorporated
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Texas Instruments Incorporated and subsidiaries (the Company) as
of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Texas Instruments Incorporated and subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated
February 24, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Dallas, Texas
February 24, 2014
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 3 5
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
REPORT BY MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of TI is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. TI’s internal
control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair
presentation of financial statements issued for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. There
has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
TI management assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making this
assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992
framework) (the COSO criteria) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.
Based on our assessment we believe that, as of December 31, 2013, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on
the COSO criteria.
TI’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting, which immediately follows this report.
3 6 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Texas Instruments Incorporated
We have audited Texas Instruments Incorporated’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). Texas Instruments Incorporated’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the
accompanying Report by management on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Texas Instruments Incorporated maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2013, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Texas Instruments Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2013, and our report dated February 24, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Dallas, Texas
February 24, 2014
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 3 7
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Summary of Selected Financial Data
[Millions of dollars, except share and per-share amounts]
For Years Ended December 31,
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating costs and expenses (a) (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating profit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense), net (OI&E) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest and debt expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends declared per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average dilutive potential common shares outstanding
$12,205
9,373
2,832
17
95
2,754
592
$ 2,162
1.91
$
1.07
$
$12,825
10,852
1,973
47
85
1,935
176
$ 1,759
1.51
$
0.72
$
9,452
4,514
37
—
4,551
1,323
10,743
2,992
5
42
2,955
719
$13,735 $13,966 $10,427
8,436
1,991
26
—
2,017
547
$ 2,236 $ 3,228 $ 1,470
1.15
$
0.45
$
1.88 $
0.56 $
2.62 $
0.49 $
during year, in millions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,113
1,146
1,171
1,213
1,269
(a) Includes Acquisition-related charges of $341 million in 2013, $471 million in 2012 and $426 million in 2011 associated with our
2011 acquisition of National.
(b) Includes Restructuring charges/other, which net to a gain of $189 million, a charge of $264 million, a charge of $112 million, a gain
of $111 million and a charge of $212 million in 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The net gain of $189 million for
2013 includes a gain of $315 million from the transfer of wireless connectivity technology; the net charge of $264 million for 2012
includes a gain on the transfer of a Japan substitutional pension of $144 million; and the net gain of $111 million for 2010 includes
a $144 million gain from the divestiture of a product line.
2013
2012
December 31,
2011
2010
2009
Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 5,272 $ 4,800 $ 4,329 $ 5,079 $ 4,527
3,158
12,119
—
9,722
3,912
20,021
4,186
10,961
3,680
13,401
—
10,437
4,428
20,497
4,211
10,952
3,399
18,938
4,158
10,807
Number of:
Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholders of record . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
32,209
17,213
34,151
18,128
34,759
19,733
28,412
20,525
26,584
24,190
2013
For Years Ended December 31,
2010
2011
2012
2009
Cash flows from operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Free cash flow (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock repurchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 3,384 $ 3,414 $ 3,256 $ 3,820 $ 2,643
753
1,890
567
954
495
2,919
819
1,800
816
2,440
644
1,973
1,199
2,621
592
2,454
412
2,972
1,175
2,868
(a) Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure derived by subtracting Capital expenditures from Cash flows from operating activities.
See Notes to financial statements and Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations.
3 8 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this document.
All dollar amounts in the tables in this discussion are stated in millions of U.S. dollars, except per-share amounts.
Overview
We design and make semiconductors that we sell to electronics designers and manufacturers all over the world. We began operations
in 1930. We are incorporated in Delaware, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, and have design, manufacturing or sales operations in 35
countries. We have three segments: Analog, Embedded Processing and Other. We expect Analog and Embedded Processing to be our
primary growth engines in the years ahead, and we therefore focus our resources on these segments.
Product information
Semiconductors are electronic components that serve as the building blocks inside modern electronic systems and equipment.
Semiconductors come in two basic forms: individual transistors and integrated circuits (generally known as “chips”) that combine
multiple transistors on a single piece of material to form a complete electronic circuit. Our products, more than 100,000 orderable parts,
are integrated circuits that are used to accomplish many different things, such as converting and amplifying signals, interfacing with
other devices, managing and distributing power, processing data, canceling noise and improving signal resolution. This broad portfolio
includes products that are integral to almost all electronic equipment.
We sell catalog and application-specific standard semiconductor products, both of which we market to multiple customers.
Catalog products are designed for use by many customers and/or many applications and are sold through both distribution and direct
channels. The vast majority of our catalog products are differentiated. We also sell catalog commodity products, but they account for
a small percentage of our revenue. The life cycles of catalog products generally span multiple years, with some products continuing
to sell for decades after their initial release. Application-specific standard products (ASSPs) are designed for use by a smaller number
of customers and are targeted to a specific application. The life cycles of ASSPs are generally determined by end-equipment upgrade
cycles and can be as short as 12 to 24 months, although some can be used across multiple generations of customers’ products.
Our segments represent groups of similar products that are combined on the basis of similar design and development requirements,
product characteristics, manufacturing processes and distribution channels, and how management allocates resources and measures
results. Additional information regarding each segment’s products follows.
Analog
Analog semiconductors change real-world signals - such as sound, temperature, pressure or images - by conditioning them, amplifying
them and often converting them to a stream of digital data that can be processed by other semiconductors, such as embedded
processors. Analog semiconductors are also used to manage power in every electronic device, whether plugged into a wall or running
off a battery. We estimate that we sell our Analog products to more than 100,000 customers. Our Analog products are used in many
markets, particularly personal electronics and industrial.
Sales of our Analog products generated about 60 percent of our revenue in 2013. According to external sources, the worldwide market
for analog semiconductors was about $40 billion in 2013. Our Analog segment’s revenue in 2013 was $7.2 billion, or about 18 percent of
this fragmented market, the leading position. We believe that we are well positioned to increase our market share over time.
Our Analog segment includes the following major product lines: High Volume Analog & Logic (HVAL), Power Management (Power),
High Performance Analog (HPA) and Silicon Valley Analog (SVA).
HVAL products: These include high-volume integrated analog products for specific applications and high-volume catalog products.
HVAL products support applications like automotive safety devices, touch screen controllers, low voltage motor drivers and integrated
motor controllers.
Power products: These include both catalog products and ASSPs that help customers manage power in electronic systems. Our
broad portfolio of Power products is designed to enhance the efficiency of powered devices using battery management solutions,
portable power conversion devices, power supply controls and point-of-load products.
HPA products: These include catalog analog products that we market to many different customers who use them in manufacturing
a wide range of products. HPA products include high-speed data converters, amplifiers, sensors, high reliability products, interface
products and precision analog products that are typically used in systems that require high performance. HPA products generally have
long life cycles, often more than 10 years.
SVA products: These include a broad portfolio of power management, data converter, interface and operational amplifier catalog
analog products used in manufacturing a wide range of products. SVA products support applications like video and data interface
products, electrical fault/arc detection systems and mobile lighting and display systems. SVA products generally have long life cycles,
often more than 10 years. SVA consists primarily of products that we acquired through our purchase of National Semiconductor
Corporation in 2011.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 3 9
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Embedded Processing
Embedded Processing products are the “brains” of many electronic devices. Embedded processors are designed to handle specific
tasks and can be optimized for various combinations of performance, power and cost, depending on the application. The devices vary
from simple, low-cost products used in electric toothbrushes to highly specialized, complex devices used in wireless basestation
communications infrastructure equipment. Our Embedded Processing products are used in many markets, particularly industrial
and automotive.
An important characteristic of our Embedded Processing products is that our customers often invest their own research and
development (R&D) to write software that operates on our products. This investment tends to increase the length of our customer
relationships because many customers prefer to re-use software from one product generation to the next.
Sales of Embedded Processing products generated about 20 percent of our revenue in 2013. According to external sources, the
worldwide market for embedded processors was about $17 billion in 2013. Our Embedded Processing segment’s revenue in 2013 was
$2.4 billion. This was the number two position and represented about 14 percent of this fragmented market. We believe we are well
positioned to increase our market share over time.
Our Embedded Processing segment includes the following major product lines: Processors, Microcontrollers and Connectivity.
Processor products: These include digital signal processors (DSPs) and applications processors. DSPs perform mathematical
computations almost instantaneously to process or improve digital data. Applications processors run an industry-standard operating
system and perform multiple complex tasks, often communicating with other systems.
Microcontroller products: Microcontrollers are self-contained systems with a processor core, memory and peripherals that are
designed to control a set of specific tasks for electronic equipment. Microcontrollers tend to have minimal requirements for memory and
program length, with no operating system and low software complexity. Analog components that control or interface with sensors and
other systems are often integrated into microcontrollers.
Connectivity products: Connectivity products enable electronic devices to seamlessly connect and transfer data, and the
requirements for speed, data capability, distance and power vary depending on the application. Our Connectivity products support
many wireless technologies to meet these requirements, including low-power wireless network standards like Zigbee® and other
technologies like Bluetooth®, WiFi and GPS. Our Connectivity products are usually designed into customer devices alongside our
processor and microcontroller products, enabling data to be collected, transmitted and acted upon.
Other
Other includes revenue from our smaller product lines, such as DLP® (primarily used in projectors to create high-definition images),
certain custom semiconductors known as application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) and calculators. It includes royalties received
for our patented technology that we license to other electronics companies and revenue from transitional supply agreements related to
acquisitions and divestitures. We also include revenue from our baseband products and from our OMAPTM applications processors and
connectivity products sold into smartphones and consumer tablets, all of which are product lines that we previously announced we are
exiting and are collectively referred to as “legacy wireless products.” Revenue from legacy wireless products declined throughout the
year, and our exit from these products is complete. Other generated $2.6 billion of revenue in 2013.
We also include in Other restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related charges, as these charges are not used in
evaluating the results of or in allocating resources to our segments. Acquisition-related charges include certain fair-value adjustments,
restructuring charges, transaction expenses, acquisition-related retention bonuses and amortization of intangible assets. Other also
includes certain corporate-level items, such as litigation expenses, environmental costs, insurance proceeds, and assets and liabilities
associated with our centralized operations, such as our worldwide manufacturing, facilities and procurement operations.
Product cycle
The global semiconductor market is characterized by constant, though generally incremental, advances in product designs and
manufacturing processes. Semiconductor prices and manufacturing costs tend to decline over time as manufacturing processes and
product life cycles mature.
Market cycle
The “semiconductor cycle” is an important concept that refers to the ebb and flow of supply and demand. The semiconductor market
historically has been characterized by periods of tight supply caused by strengthening demand and/or insufficient manufacturing
capacity, followed by periods of surplus inventory caused by weakening demand and/or excess manufacturing capacity. These are
typically referred to as upturns and downturns in the semiconductor cycle. The semiconductor cycle is affected by the significant time
and money required to build and maintain semiconductor manufacturing facilities.
4 0 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
Seasonality
Our revenue is subject to some seasonal variation. Our semiconductor revenue tends to be weaker in the first and fourth quarters when
compared to the second and third quarters. Calculator revenue is tied to the U.S. back-to-school season and is therefore at its highest in
the second and third quarters.
Manufacturing
Semiconductor manufacturing begins with a sequence of photo-lithographic and chemical processing steps that fabricate a number of
semiconductor devices on a thin silicon wafer. Each device on the wafer is tested, the wafer is cut into individual units and each unit is
assembled into a package that then is usually retested. The entire process takes place in highly specialized facilities and requires an
average of 12 weeks, with most products completing within 8 to 16 weeks.
The cost and lifespan of the equipment and processes we use to manufacture semiconductors vary by technology. Our Analog
products and most of our Embedded Processing products can be manufactured using mature and stable, and therefore less expensive,
equipment than is needed for manufacturing advanced logic products, such as some of our processor products.
We own and operate semiconductor manufacturing facilities in North America, Asia, Japan and Europe. These include both wafer
fabrication and assembly/test facilities. Our facilities require substantial investment to construct and are largely fixed-cost assets
once in operation. Because we own much of our manufacturing capacity, a significant portion of our operating cost is fixed. In general,
these fixed costs do not decline with reductions in customer demand or utilization of capacity, potentially lowering our profit margins.
Conversely, as product demand rises and factory utilization increases, the fixed costs are spread over increased output, potentially
benefiting our profit margins.
We expect to maintain sufficient internal manufacturing capacity to meet the vast majority of our production needs. To supplement
our manufacturing capacity and maximize our responsiveness to customer demand and return on capital, we utilize the capacity of
outside suppliers, commonly known as foundries, and subcontractors. In 2013, we sourced about 20 percent of our total wafers from
external foundries and about 35 percent of our assembly/test services from subcontractors.
In 2013, we closed older wafer fabrication facilities in Hiji, Japan, and Houston, Texas. In December 2013, we acquired an assembly/
test facility in the Hi-Tech Zone of Chengdu, China, adjacent to our existing fabrication facility in Chengdu.
Inventory
Our inventory practices differ by product, but we generally maintain inventory levels that are consistent with our expectations of
customer demand. Because of the longer product life cycles of catalog products and their inherently lower risk of obsolescence,
we generally carry more inventory of those products than application-specific products. Additionally, we sometimes maintain
product inventory in unfinished wafer form, as well as higher finished-goods inventory of low-volume catalog products, allowing
greater flexibility in periods of high demand. We also have consignment inventory programs in place for our largest customers and
some distributors.
Tax considerations
We operate in a number of tax jurisdictions and are subject to several types of taxes including those that are based on income, capital,
property and payroll, as well as sales and other transactional taxes. The timing of the final determination of our tax liabilities varies by
jurisdiction and taxing authority. As a result, during any particular reporting period we may reflect in our financial statements one or
more tax refunds or assessments, or changes to tax liabilities, involving one or more taxing authorities.
Results of operations
2013 compared with 2012
Our performance in 2013 was strong, reflecting our increased focus on Analog and Embedded Processing, where the diversity and
longevity of our positions are assets. During 2013, 79 percent of our revenue came from our core businesses of Analog and Embedded
Processing, with Analog revenue increasing 3 percent from 2012 and Embedded Processing revenue increasing 9 percent from 2012.
Operating margin for Analog was 25.8 percent, and it exceeded 30 percent during the second half of 2013. Operating margin for
Embedded Processing was 7.6 percent, a level that should increase as we continue to grow and better align resources with market
opportunities. Additionally, we completed our exit from legacy wireless products. Our business model continues to generate strong cash
flow from operations, with free cash flow for 2013 of $3 billion, or 24 percent of revenue. During the year we returned over $4 billion of
cash to investors through a combination of stock repurchases and dividends.
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation to GAAP and an explanation of the purpose for providing this
non-GAAP measure, see the Non-GAAP financial information section after the Liquidity and capital resources section.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 4 1
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
For Years Ended
December 31,
2012
2013
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Revenue by segment:
Analog . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,194
Embedded Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,450
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,561
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12,205
Cost of revenue (COR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5,841
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6,364
Research and development (R&D) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,522
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,858
Acquisition charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
341
Restructuring charges/other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(189)
Operating profit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,832
Other income (expense) net (OI&E) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17
Interest and debt expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
95
Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,754
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
592
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,162
Diluted earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
1.91
$ 6,998
2,257
3,570
12,825
6,457
6,368
1,877
1,804
450
264
1,973
47
85
1,935
176
$ 1,759
1.51
$
2011
$ 6,375
2,381
4,979
13,735
6,963
6,772
1,715
1,638
315
112
2,992
5
42
2,955
719
$ 2,236
1.88
$
Percentage of revenue:
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R&D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SG&A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
52.1%
12.5%
15.2%
23.2%
49.6%
14.6%
14.1%
15.4%
49.3%
12.5%
11.9%
21.8%
As required by accounting rule ASC 260, net income allocated to unvested restricted stock units (RSUs), on which we pay dividend
equivalents, is excluded from the calculation of earnings per share (EPS). The amount excluded was $36 million, $31 million and
$34 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
On May 3, 2013, we filed a Report on Form 8-K to recast the information in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012, to reflect the elimination, effective January 1, 2013, of the Wireless segment. The information in this Management’s
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (MD&A) is presented on a basis that is consistent with that
Form 8-K.
Our exit from legacy wireless products and the elimination of the Wireless segment resulted in changes to our corporate-level
expense allocations, which negatively affected segment-level profitability in the year ended December 31, 2013. We expect a similar,
although less significant, effect through the end of 2014. We allocate our corporate-level expenses, which are largely fixed, among our
product lines in proportion to the operating expenses directly generated by them. Legacy wireless products generated lower operating
expenses in 2013 than 2012 because we stopped investing in them. The corporate-level expenses allocated to those products were,
therefore, proportionately lower, and the corporate-level expenses allocated to the remaining product lines were proportionately higher.
This allocation change affects the profitability of each of our segments, but does not impact operating expense or profitability trends at
the consolidated level.
Throughout the following discussion of our results of operations, unless otherwise noted, changes in our revenue are attributable to
changes in customer demand, which are evidenced by fluctuations in shipment volumes. New products tend not to have a significant
impact on our results in any given period because our revenue is derived from such a large number of products. From time to time, our
revenue and gross profit are affected by changes in demand for higher-priced or lower-priced products, which we refer to as changes in
the “mix” of products shipped.
4 2 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Details of 2013 financial results
Revenue in 2013 was $12.20 billion, down $620 million, or 5 percent, from 2012 due to lower revenue from legacy wireless products.
Despite the decline in overall revenue, gross profit in 2013 of $6.36 billion was about even with 2012 due to a more favorable mix of
products shipped and, to a lesser extent, lower manufacturing costs. Gross profit margin in 2013 was 52.1 percent of revenue compared
with 49.6 percent in 2012.
Operating expenses were $1.52 billion for R&D and $1.86 billion for SG&A. R&D expense decreased $355 million, or 19 percent,
from 2012 primarily reflecting the wind-down of our legacy wireless products. R&D expense as a percent of revenue was 12.5 percent
compared with 14.6 percent in 2012. SG&A expense increased $54 million, or 3 percent, from 2012 primarily due to higher variable
compensation and other support costs, partially offset by reduced costs from the wind-down of our legacy wireless products. SG&A
expense as a percent of revenue was 15.2 percent compared with 14.1 percent in 2012.
Acquisition charges were related to our 2011 acquisition of National Semiconductor and were $341 million in 2013 compared with
$450 million in 2012. The charges were primarily from the amortization of intangible assets. The decrease from 2012 was due to the
nonrecurrence of integration-related expenses. See Note 2 to the financial statements for detailed information.
Restructuring charges/other in 2013 was a net credit of $189 million, reflecting the $315 million gain from our transfer of wireless
connectivity technology to a customer in the second quarter, partially offset by restructuring charges of $126 million. This compared with a
net charge of $264 million in 2012, which included restructuring and other charges of $408 million, partially offset by a $144 million gain
from the transfer of the obligations and assets of a portion of our Japan pension program from the pension trust to the government of Japan.
These net amounts are all included in Other. For details on restructuring actions, see the Restructuring actions section of this MD&A.
Operating profit was $2.83 billion, or 23.2 percent of revenue, compared with $1.97 billion, or 15.4 percent of revenue, in 2012.
OI&E for 2013 was income of $17 million compared with $47 million for 2012. The decrease was due to lower tax-related interest income.
Interest and debt expense was $95 million compared with $85 million in 2012. The increase was primarily due to higher average
interest rates on debt outstanding during the period. See Note 12 to the financial statements for more information.
The income tax provision for 2013 was $592 million compared with $176 million for the prior year. The increase in the total tax
provision was due to higher income before income taxes and, to a lesser extent, lower discrete tax benefits. The discrete tax benefits
were $79 million in 2013, primarily due to the effect of the reinstatement of the federal research tax credit for 2012. In 2012, the
discrete tax benefits were $252 million, primarily due to additional U.S. tax benefits for manufacturing related to prior years. Our annual
effective tax rates were 24 percent in 2013 and 22 percent in 2012. These rates exclude the impact of the discrete tax benefits. See
Note 7 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the income tax provision to the statutory federal tax.
Net income was $2.16 billion, an increase of $403 million, or 23 percent, from 2012. EPS for 2013 was $1.91 compared with
$1.51 for 2012. EPS in 2013 benefited $0.06 from 2012 due to a lower number of average shares outstanding as a result of our stock
repurchase program.
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
Segment results
Analog
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,194
Operating profit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,859
$ 6,998
1,650
3%
13%
Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.8% 23.6%
Analog revenue increased $196 million, or 3 percent, from 2012 primarily due to growth in Power. Revenue from SVA and HPA also
increased, but to a lesser extent. HVAL revenue decreased primarily due to a less favorable mix of products shipped.
Operating profit was $1.86 billion, or 25.8 percent of revenue. This was an increase of $209 million, or 13 percent, compared with
2012 primarily due to higher gross profit that benefited from higher revenue and lower manufacturing costs. This increase in gross profit
was partially offset by higher operating expenses.
2013
2012
Change
Embedded Processing
2013
2012
Change
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,450
Operating profit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
185
7.6%
Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 2,257
158
7.0%
9%
17%
Embedded Processing revenue increased $193 million, or 9 percent, compared with 2012 primarily due to higher revenue from
Microcontrollers, and to a lesser extent, Processors and Connectivity.
Operating profit was $185 million, or 7.6 percent of revenue. This was an increase of $27 million, or 17 percent, compared with
2012 due to higher revenue and associated gross profit, partially offset by higher operating expenses.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 4 3
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Other
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,561
Operating profit* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
788
30.8%
Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 3,570
165
4.6%
2013
2012
Change
-28%
378%
* Includes Acquisition charges and Restructuring charges/other
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Revenue from Other was $2.56 billion in 2013. This was a decrease of $1.01 billion, or 28 percent, from 2012 primarily due to lower
revenue from legacy wireless products.
Operating profit for 2013 from Other was $788 million, or 30.8 percent of revenue. This was an increase of $623 million, or
378 percent, compared with 2012 due to lower operating expenses and Restructuring charges/other. See Note 3 to the financial
statements for more information on Restructuring charges/other. These decreases were partially offset by lower revenue and associated
gross profit.
Prior results of operations – 2012 compared with 2011
During 2012, we faced a weak demand environment, but our operations performed well and we strengthened our strategic position. We
grew our free cash flow to almost $3 billion, or 23 percent of revenue, despite lower revenue that resulted primarily from our decision
to exit wireless baseband products. Our free cash flow was the result of more of our revenue coming from Analog and Embedded
Processing, which offer solid growth and high margins and have low capital needs. During 2012, we returned 90 percent of this free
cash flow to stockholders through our continued share repurchases and higher dividend payments.
Revenue in 2012 was $12.82 billion, down $910 million, or 7 percent, from 2011 primarily due to a weak demand environment.
Revenue from a full year’s inclusion of SVA slightly more than offset lower revenue from wireless baseband products.
Gross profit in 2012 was $6.37 billion, a decrease of $404 million, or 6 percent, from 2011. The decrease was primarily due to lower
revenue. Gross profit margin in 2012 was 49.6 percent of revenue compared with 49.3 percent in 2011.
Operating expenses in 2012 were $1.88 billion for R&D and $1.80 billion for SG&A. R&D expense increased $162 million, or 9
percent, from 2011 primarily due to the inclusion of a full year of SVA. In 2012, R&D expense as a percent of revenue was 14.6 percent
compared with 12.5 percent in 2011. SG&A expense increased $166 million, or 10 percent, from 2011 due to the inclusion of a full year
of SVA. In 2012, SG&A expense as a percent of revenue was 14.1 percent compared with 11.9 percent in 2011.
Acquisition charges were related to the National acquisition and were $450 million in 2012 and $315 million in 2011. The increase
was due to a full year of amortization of acquired intangible assets.
Restructuring charges/other were $264 million in 2012 and $112 million in 2011. The increase was primarily due to the
restructuring of our former Wireless segment, partially offset by a $144 million gain we recognized from the Japan pension
program change.
Operating profit in 2012 was $1.97 billion, or 15.4 percent of revenue, compared with $2.99 billion, or 21.8 percent of revenue, in
2011. The decrease was due to, in decreasing order, lower gross profit, higher operating expenses, higher restructuring charges and
higher acquisition charges.
OI&E for 2012 was income of $47 million compared with $5 million for 2011. The increase was primarily due to tax-related
interest income.
Interest and debt expense was $85 million in 2012 compared with $42 million in 2011. The increase was primarily due to having
debt outstanding for a full year in 2012 compared with about eight months in 2011. We issued debt in May 2011 and assumed debt in
September 2011, both in connection with our acquisition of National.
The annual effective tax rate for 2012 was 22 percent, which excluded discrete tax benefits of $252 million, resulting in a total
income tax provision for 2012 of $176 million compared with a total tax provision of $719 million for the prior year. The decrease in
the total tax provision was due to the combination of lower income before income taxes and the impact of discrete tax benefits. The
decrease was partially offset by the impact of the expiration of the federal research tax credit at the end of 2011.
Net income in 2012 was $1.76 billion, a decrease of $477 million, or 21 percent, from 2011. EPS for 2012 was $1.51 compared
with $1.88 for 2011. The decline in EPS was due to lower net income. EPS in 2012 benefited $0.03 from 2011 due to a lower number of
average shares outstanding as a result of our stock repurchase program.
4 4 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Segment results
Analog
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,998
Operating profit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,650
$ 6,375
1,693
10%
-3%
Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23.6% 26.6%
Analog revenue for 2012 increased $623 million, or 10 percent, from 2011 primarily due to the inclusion of a full year of SVA, and
to a lesser extent, growth in Power. Partially offsetting the increase was lower revenue from HPA. Revenue from HVAL products was
about even.
Operating profit for 2012 was $1.65 billion, or 23.6 percent of revenue. This was a decrease of $43 million, or 3 percent, compared
with 2011 primarily due to higher operating expenses from the inclusion of a full year of SVA, partially offset by higher gross profit.
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
2012
2011
Change
Embedded Processing
2012
2011
Change
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,257
Operating profit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
158
7.0% 16.3%
Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 2,381
387
-5%
-59%
Embedded Processing revenue for 2012 decreased $124 million, or 5 percent, compared with 2011 due to lower revenue from
Processors and, to a lesser extent, a less favorable mix of Microcontrollers shipped. The decrease was partially offset by higher revenue
from Connectivity.
Operating profit for 2012 was $158 million, or 7.0 percent of revenue. This was a decrease of $229 million, or 59 percent, compared
with 2011 primarily due to lower gross profit, and to a lesser extent, higher operating expenses.
Other
$ 4,979
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,570
Operating profit* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
912
165
4.6% 18.3%
Operating profit % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012
2011
Change
-28%
-82%
* Includes Acquisition charges and Restructuring charges/other
Revenue from Other was $3.57 billion in 2012. This was a decrease of $1.41 billion, or 28 percent, from 2011 primarily due to lower
revenue from wireless baseband products.
Operating profit for 2012 from Other was $165 million, or 4.6 percent of revenue. This was a decrease of $747 million, or
82 percent, compared with 2011 due to lower revenue and associated gross profit and higher restructuring and acquisition charges.
Included in Restructuring charges/other for 2012 was a $144 million gain from the Japan pension program change. The increase in
acquisition charges was due to a full year of increased amortization expense for acquired intangible assets.
Restructuring actions
We periodically undertake restructuring actions to focus our investments on opportunities that have the best potential for sustainable
growth and returns. In January 2014, we announced cost-saving actions in Embedded Processing and in Japan to focus on markets
with greater potential for sustainable growth and strong long-term returns. Cost reductions include the elimination of about 1,100 jobs
worldwide, and we expect annualized savings of about $130 million by the end of 2014. We expect these actions to be substantially
complete by mid-2015. Total restructuring charges related to these actions are expected to be about $80 million, all of which will be
severance and related benefit costs. Additionally, in 2012 we announced a restructuring of our Wireless business and closure of two
older semiconductor manufacturing facilities in Houston, Texas, and Hiji, Japan. Both of these actions were complete by the end of 2013.
In 2013, restructuring charges were $126 million, which consisted of $49 million related to the action in Embedded Processing,
$38 million related to the Wireless action and $39 million related to the closing of the manufacturing facilities. Of the $126 million,
$85 million was for severance and benefit costs and $41 million was for other charges.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 4 5
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
In 2012, restructuring charges were $400 million, which consisted of $351 million related to the Wireless action and $49 million
related to the closing of the manufacturing facilities. Of the $400 million, $251 million was for severance and benefit costs and
$149 million was for other charges, including a non-tax-deductible goodwill impairment of $90 million.
All of these charges are reflected on the Restructuring charges/other line and are included in Other. See Note 3 to the financial
statements for more information.
Financial condition
At the end of 2013, total cash (Cash and cash equivalents plus Short-term investments) was $3.83 billion, a decrease of $136 million
from the end of 2012.
Accounts receivable were $1.20 billion at the end of 2013. This was a decrease of $27 million compared with the end of 2012. Days
sales outstanding were 36 at the end of 2013 compared with 37 at the end of 2012.
Inventory was $1.73 billion at the end of 2013. This was a decrease of $26 million from the end of 2012. Days of inventory at the
end of 2013 were 112 compared with 103 at the end of 2012, consistent with our target range of 105 to 115 days.
Liquidity and capital resources
Our primary source of liquidity is cash flow from operations. Additional sources of liquidity are Cash and cash equivalents, Short-term
investments and revolving credit facilities. Cash flow from operating activities for 2013 was $3.38 billion, about even with last year as
the increase in net income was largely offset by the increase in working capital requirements.
We had $1.63 billion of Cash and cash equivalents and $2.20 billion of Short-term investments as of December 31, 2013.
We have a variable-rate revolving credit facility with a consortium of investment-grade banks that allows us to borrow up to
$2 billion until March 2018. This credit facility also serves as support for the issuance of commercial paper. As of December 31, 2013,
our credit facility was undrawn and we had no commercial paper outstanding.
In 2013, investing activities used $3 million compared with $1.04 billion in 2012. For 2013, Capital expenditures were $412 million
compared with $495 million in 2012. Capital expenditures in both periods were primarily for semiconductor manufacturing equipment.
In 2013, we had sales of short-term investments, net of purchases, that provided cash proceeds of $342 million. This compared with
using cash of $604 million in 2012 to make purchases of short-term investments, net of sales.
In 2013, financing activities used net cash of $3.17 billion compared with $1.95 billion in 2012. In 2013, we received proceeds of
$986 million from the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt (net of original issuance discount) and repaid $1.50 billion of maturing debt.
In 2012, we received net proceeds of $1.49 billion from the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and repaid $1.38 billion of debt and
commercial paper. Dividends paid in 2013 were $1.18 billion compared with $819 million in 2012, reflecting increases in the dividend
rate in each year. In 2013, we announced two increases in our quarterly cash dividend. During 2013, the quarterly dividend increased
from $0.21 to $0.30 per share, resulting in an annualized dividend payment of $1.20 per share. In 2013, we used $2.87 billion to
repurchase 77.6 million shares of our common stock. This compared with $1.80 billion used in 2012 to repurchase 59.8 million shares.
Employee exercises of stock options are also reflected in Cash flows from financing activities. In 2013, these exercises provided cash
proceeds of $1.31 billion compared with $523 million in 2012. Stock option exercises in 2013 were higher than historical averages.
We believe we have the necessary financial resources and operating plans to fund our working capital needs, capital expenditures,
dividend and debt-related payments, and other business requirements for at least the next 12 months.
Non-GAAP financial information
This MD&A includes references to free cash flow and various ratios based on that measure. These are financial measures that were
not prepared in accordance with GAAP. Free cash flow was calculated by subtracting Capital expenditures from the most directly
comparable GAAP measure, Cash flows from operating activities (also referred to as Cash flow from operations).
The free cash flow measures were compared to the following GAAP items to determine the various non-GAAP ratios presented
below and referred to in the MD&A: Revenue, Dividends paid and Stock repurchases. Reconciliation to the most directly comparable
GAAP-based ratios is provided in the tables below.
We believe these non-GAAP measures provide insight into our liquidity, our cash-generating capability and the amount of
cash potentially available to return to investors, as well as insight into our financial performance. These non-GAAP measures are
supplemental to the comparable GAAP measures.
4 6 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Non-GAAP Reconciliations
For Year Ended
December 31, 2013
Percentage
of Revenue
For Year Ended
December 31, 2012
Percentage
of Revenue
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$12,205
Cash flow from operations (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Free cash flow (non-GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 3,384
(412)
$ 2,972
28%
24%
$12,825
$ 3,414
(495)
$ 2,919
27%
23%
For Year Ended
December 31, 2012
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock repurchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total cash returned to shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 819
1,800
$2,619
Percentage of Cash flow from operations (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percentage of free cash flow (non-GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
77%
90%
Long-term contractual obligations
Contractual Obligations
Payments Due by Period
2014
2015/2016
2017/2018
Thereafter
Total
Long-term debt obligations (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating lease obligations (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Software license obligations (c). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase obligations (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred compensation plan (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total (f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,000
96
44
102
15
$ 1,257
$2,000
141
69
77
33
$2,320
$ 875
76
—
32
35
$1,018
$1,250
100
—
22
77
$1,449
$ 5,125
413
113
233
160
$ 6,044
(a) Long-term debt obligations include amounts classified as the current portion of long-term debt, specifically obligations that will
mature within 12 months. The related interest payments are not included.
(b) Includes minimum payments for leased facilities and equipment and purchases of industrial gases under contracts accounted for as
an operating lease.
(c) Includes payments under license agreements for electronic design automation software.
(d) Includes contractual arrangements with suppliers where there is a fixed, non-cancellable payment schedule or minimum payments
due with a reduced delivery schedule. Excluded from the table are cancellable arrangements. However, depending on when certain
purchase arrangements may be cancelled, an additional $14 million of cancellation penalties may be required to be paid, which are
not reflected in the table.
(e) Includes an estimate of payments under this plan for the liability that existed at December 31, 2013.
(f) Excluded from the table are $91 million of uncertain tax liabilities under ASC 740, as well as any planned future funding
contributions to retirement benefit plans. Amounts associated with uncertain tax liabilities have been excluded because of the
difficulty in making reasonably reliable estimates of the timing of cash settlements with the respective taxing authorities. Regarding
future funding of retirement benefit plans, we plan to contribute about $50 million in 2014, but funding projections beyond 2014 are
not practical to estimate due to the rules affecting tax-deductible contributions and the impact from the plans’ asset performance,
interest rates and potential U.S. and non-U.S. legislation.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 4 7
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Critical accounting policies
In preparing our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we
use statistical analyses, estimates and projections that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures and may vary from actual
results. We consider the following accounting policies to be both those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition
and that require the most subjective judgment. If actual results differ significantly from management’s estimates and projections, there
could be a significant effect on our financial statements.
Revenue recognition
Revenue from sales of our products, including sales to our distributors, is recognized upon shipment or delivery, depending upon the
terms of the sales order, provided that persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists, title and risk of loss have transferred to the
customer, the sales amounts are fixed or determinable, and collection of the revenue is reasonably assured. Revenue from sales of
our products that are subject to inventory consignment agreements is recognized when the customer or distributor pulls product from
consignment inventory that we store at designated locations.
We reduce revenue based on estimates of future credits to be granted to customers. Credits include volume-based incentives,
other special pricing arrangements and product returns due to quality issues. Our estimates of future credits are based on historical
experience, analysis of product shipments and contractual arrangements with customers and distributors.
In 2013, about 55 percent of our revenue was generated from sales of our products to distributors. We recognize distributor revenue
net of allowances, which are management’s estimates based on analysis of historical data, current economic conditions and contractual
terms. These allowances recognize the impact of credits granted to distributors under certain programs common in the semiconductor
industry whereby distributors receive certain price adjustments to meet individual competitive opportunities, or are allowed to return
or scrap a limited amount of product in accordance with contractual terms agreed upon with the distributor, or receive price protection
credits when our standard published prices are lowered from the price the distributor paid for product still in its inventory, or other
incentives designed to maximize growth opportunities. Historical claims data are maintained for each of the programs, with differences
among geographic regions taken into consideration. We continually monitor the actual claimed allowances against our estimates, and
we adjust our estimates as appropriate to reflect trends in distributor revenue and inventory levels. Allowances are also adjusted when
recent historical data do not represent anticipated future activity. About 50 percent of our distributor revenue is generated from sales of
consigned inventory, and we expect this proportion to continue to grow over time. The allowances we record against this revenue are
not material.
In addition, we monitor collectability of accounts receivable primarily through review of the accounts receivable aging. When
collection is at risk, we assess the impact on amounts recorded for bad debts and, if necessary, will record a charge in the period such
determination is made.
Income taxes
In determining net income for financial statement purposes, we must make certain estimates and judgments in the calculation of tax
provisions and the resultant tax liabilities, and in the recoverability of deferred tax assets that arise from temporary differences between
the tax and financial statement recognition of revenue and expense.
In the ordinary course of global business, there may be many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is
uncertain. The calculation of tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. We recognize
potential liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on an estimate of the ultimate resolution
of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. Although we believe the estimates are reasonable, no assurance
can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be different than what is reflected in the historical income tax provisions
and accruals.
As part of our financial process, we must assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets can be recovered. If recovery is not
likely, the provision for taxes must be increased by recording a reserve in the form of a valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets
that are estimated not to be ultimately recoverable. In this process, certain relevant criteria are evaluated including the existence of
deferred tax liabilities that can be used to absorb deferred tax assets, the taxable income in prior years that can be used to absorb net
operating losses and credit carrybacks, and taxable income in future years. Our judgment regarding future recoverability of our deferred
tax assets based on these criteria may change due to various factors, including changes in U.S. or international tax laws and changes
in market conditions and their impact on our assessment of taxable income in future periods. These changes, if any, may require
material adjustments to the deferred tax assets and an accompanying reduction or increase in net income in the period when such
determinations are made. Also, our plans for the permanent reinvestment or eventual repatriation of the accumulated earnings of certain
of our non-U.S. operations could change. Such changes could have a material effect on tax expense in future years.
4 8 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
In addition to the factors described above, the effective tax rate reflected in forward-looking statements is based on then-current
tax law. Significant changes in tax law enacted during the year could affect these estimates. Retroactive changes in tax law enacted
subsequent to the end of a reporting period are reflected in the period of enactment as a discrete tax item. The extent to which the
effective tax rate reflected in forward-looking statements differs from the 35 percent statutory corporate tax rate is generally due to
lower statutory tax rates applicable to our operations in many of the jurisdictions in which we operate and from U.S. tax benefits. These
lower tax rates are generally statutory in nature, without expiration and available to companies that operate in those taxing jurisdictions.
Inventory valuation allowances
Inventory is valued net of allowances for unsalable or obsolete raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods. Allowances are
determined quarterly by comparing inventory levels of individual materials and parts to historical usage rates, current backlog and
estimated future sales and by analyzing the age of inventory, in order to identify specific components of inventory that are judged
unlikely to be sold. Allowances are also calculated quarterly for instances where inventoried costs for individual products are in excess
of market prices for those products. In addition to this specific identification process, statistical allowances are calculated for remaining
inventory based on historical write-offs of inventory for salability and obsolescence reasons. Actual future write-offs of inventory for
salability and obsolescence reasons may differ from estimates and calculations used to determine valuation allowances due to changes
in customer demand, customer negotiations, technology shifts and other factors.
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
Impairment of acquisition-related intangibles and goodwill
We review acquisition-related intangible assets for impairment when certain indicators suggest the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. Factors considered include the underperformance of an asset compared with expectations and shortened useful lives due
to planned changes in the use of the assets. Recoverability is determined by comparing the carrying amount of the assets to estimated
future undiscounted cash flows. If future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, an impairment charge would be
recognized for the excess of the carrying amount over fair value, determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique. Additionally,
in the case of intangible assets that will continue to be used in future periods, a shortened useful life may be utilized if appropriate,
resulting in accelerated amortization based upon the expected net realizable value of the asset at the date the asset will no longer
be utilized.
We review goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if certain impairment indicators arise, such as significant changes in
business climate, operating performance or competition, or upon the disposition of a significant portion of a reporting unit. A significant
amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred between annual test dates. This impairment
review compares the fair value for each reporting unit containing goodwill to its carrying value. Determining the fair value of a reporting
unit involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including projected future cash flows, discount rates based on weighted
average cost of capital and future economic and market conditions. We base our fair-value estimates on assumptions we believe to
be reasonable.
Actual cash flow amounts for future periods may differ from estimates used in impairment testing.
Changes in accounting standards
See Note 1 to the financial statements for information on new accounting standards.
Off-balance sheet arrangements
As of December 31, 2013, we had no significant off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Commitments and contingencies
See Note 13 to the financial statements for a discussion of our commitments and contingencies.
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
Foreign exchange risk
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for financial reporting. Our non-U.S. entities frequently own assets or liabilities denominated in
U.S. dollars or non-local currencies. Exchange rate fluctuations can have a significant impact on taxable income in those jurisdictions,
and consequently our effective tax rate.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 4 9
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
We use forward currency exchange contracts to reduce the earnings impact exchange rate fluctuations may have on our non-U.S.
dollar net balance sheet exposures. For example, at year-end 2013, we had forward currency exchange contracts outstanding with a
notional value of $459 million to hedge net balance sheet exposures (including $211 million to sell Japanese yen, $120 million to sell
euros and $33 million to sell British pound sterling). Similar hedging activities existed at year-end 2012.
Because most of the aggregate non-U.S. dollar balance sheet exposure is hedged by these forward currency exchange contracts,
based on year-end 2013 balances and currency exchange rates, a hypothetical 10 percent plus or minus fluctuation in non-U.S.
currency exchange rates would result in a pre-tax currency exchange gain or loss of approximately $4 million.
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Interest rate risk
We have the following potential exposure to changes in interest rates: (1) the effect of changes in interest rates on the fair value of our
investments in cash equivalents and short-term investments, which could produce a gain or a loss; and (2) the effect of changes in
interest rates on the fair value of our debt.
As of December 31, 2013, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would decrease the fair value of our investments
in cash equivalents and short-term investments by $9 million and decrease the fair value of our long-term debt by $147 million.
Because interest rates on our long-term debt are fixed, changes in interest rates would not affect the cash flows associated with
long-term debt.
Equity risk
Long-term investments at year-end 2013 include the following:
• Investments in mutual funds - includes mutual funds that were selected to generate returns that offset changes in certain
liabilities related to deferred compensation arrangements. The mutual funds hold a variety of debt and equity investments.
• Investments in venture capital funds - includes investments in limited partnerships (accounted for under either the equity or
cost method).
• Equity investments - includes non-marketable (non-publicly traded) equity securities.
Investments in mutual funds are stated at fair value. Changes in prices of the mutual fund investments are expected to offset related
changes in deferred compensation liabilities such that a 10 percent increase or decrease in the investments’ fair values would not
materially affect operating results. Non-marketable equity securities and some venture capital funds are stated at cost. Impairments
deemed to be other-than-temporary are expensed in net income. Investments in the remaining venture capital funds are stated using
the equity method. See Note 9 to the financial statements for details of equity and other long-term investments.
5 0 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Quarterly Financial Data
[Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts]
2013
Quarter
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,885
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,374
Operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
395
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
362
Earnings per common share:
$ 3,047
1,570
906
660
$ 3,244
1,779
844
629
$ 3,028
1,640
687
511
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
Basic earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.32
Diluted earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.32
$ 0.59
0.58
$ 0.56
0.56
$ 0.46
0.46
2012
Quarter
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,121
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,531
397
Operating profit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
265
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earnings per common share:
$ 3,335
1,651
598
446
$ 3,390
1,740
840
784
$ 2,979
1,445
139
264
Basic earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.23
Diluted earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.22
$ 0.38
0.38
$ 0.68
0.67
$ 0.23
0.23
Included in the results above were the following items:
2013
Quarter
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Acquisition charges (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring charges/other (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
86
15
$
86
(282)
$
86
16
$
84
62
2012
Quarter
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Acquisition-related charges (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recorded as Cost of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recorded as Acquisition charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring charges/other (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 174
21
153
10
$ 104
—
104
13
$ 106
—
106
(122)
$
88
—
88
363
(a) See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information.
(b) See Note 3 to the financial statements for additional information.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 5 1
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
COMMON STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
TI common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market. The table below shows the high and low closing prices of TI common
stock as reported by Bloomberg L.P. and the dividends paid per common share for each quarter during the past two years.
Quarter
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
Stock prices:
2013 High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 35.62
31.55
34.24
29.24
Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 37.09
33.92
33.41
26.55
$ 40.85
35.05
30.38
26.06
$ 43.91
39.24
31.81
27.00
Dividends paid:
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 0.21
0.17
$ 0.28
0.17
$ 0.28
0.17
$ 0.30
0.21
COMPARISON OF TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN
This graph compares TI’s total shareholder return with the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Information Technology Index over a five-year
period, beginning December 31, 2008, and ending December 31, 2013. The total shareholder return assumes $100 invested at the
beginning of the period in TI common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Information Technology Index. It also assumes reinvestment
of all dividends.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Texas Instruments Incorporated, the S&P 500 Index,
and the S&P Information Technology Index
$350
$300
$250
$200
$150
$100
$50
$0
12/08
12/09
12/10
12/11
12/12
12/13
Texas Instruments Incorporated
S&P 500
S&P Information Technology
*$100 invested on 12/31/08 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending December 31.
Texas Instruments Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S&P 500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S&P Information Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$100.00
100.00
100.00
$171.84
126.46
161.72
$218.40
145.51
178.20
$198.98
148.59
182.50
$216.26
172.37
209.55
$316.34
228.19
269.13
Dec-08
Dec-09
Dec-10
Dec-11
Dec-12
Dec-13
5 2 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
“SAFE HARBOR” STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM
ACT OF 1995:
This report includes forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by phrases such as TI or its
management “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “foresees,” “forecasts,” “estimates” or other words or phrases of similar import.
Similarly, statements herein that describe TI’s business strategy, outlook, objectives, plans, intentions or goals also are forward-looking
statements. All such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in forward-looking statements.
We urge you to carefully consider the following important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the
L
A
U
N
N
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
expectations of TI or its management:
• Market demand for semiconductors, particularly in markets such as personal electronics, especially the mobile phone sector,
and industrial;
• TI’s ability to maintain or improve profit margins, including its ability to utilize its manufacturing facilities at sufficient levels to
cover its fixed operating costs, in an intensely competitive and cyclical industry;
• TI’s ability to develop, manufacture and market innovative products in a rapidly changing technological environment;
• TI’s ability to compete in products and prices in an intensely competitive industry;
• TI’s ability to maintain and enforce a strong intellectual property portfolio and obtain needed licenses from third parties;
• Expiration of license agreements between TI and its patent licensees, and market conditions reducing royalty payments to TI;
• Violations of or changes in the complex laws, regulations and policies to which our global operations are subject, and economic,
social and political conditions in the countries in which TI, its customers or its suppliers operate, including security risks, health
conditions, possible disruptions in transportation, communications and information technology networks and fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates;
• Natural events such as severe weather and earthquakes in the locations in which TI, its customers or its suppliers operate;
• Availability and cost of raw materials, utilities, manufacturing equipment, third-party manufacturing services and
manufacturing technology;
• Changes in the tax rate applicable to TI as the result of changes in tax law, the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be
earned and taxed, the outcome of tax audits and the ability to realize deferred tax assets;
• Changes in laws and regulations to which TI or its suppliers are or may become subject, such as those imposing fees or reporting
or substitution costs relating to the discharge of emissions into the environment or the use of certain raw materials in our
manufacturing processes;
• Losses or curtailments of purchases from key customers and the timing and amount of distributor and other customer
inventory adjustments;
• Financial difficulties of our distributors or their promotion of competing product lines to TI’s detriment;
• A loss suffered by a customer or distributor of TI with respect to TI-consigned inventory;
• Customer demand that differs from our forecasts;
• The financial impact of inadequate or excess TI inventory that results from demand that differs from projections;
• Impairments of our non-financial assets;
• Product liability or warranty claims, claims based on epidemic or delivery failure or recalls by TI customers for a product
containing a TI part;
• TI’s ability to recruit and retain skilled personnel;
• Timely implementation of new manufacturing technologies and installation of manufacturing equipment, and the ability to obtain
needed third-party foundry and assembly/test subcontract services;
• TI’s obligation to make principal and interest payments on its debt;
• TI’s ability to successfully integrate and realize opportunities for growth from acquisitions, and our ability to realize our
expectations regarding the amount and timing of restructuring charges and associated cost savings; and
• Breaches of our information technology systems.
For a more detailed discussion of these factors see the Risk Factors discussion in Item 1A of our most recent Form 10-K. The
forward-looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date of this report (March 2014) and we undertake no
obligation to update the forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
2013 ANNUAL REPORT • 5 3
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
(This page intentionally left blank.)
R
E
P
O
R
T
A
N
N
U
A
L
5 4 • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders on Thursday, April 17, 2014, at the cafeteria on our property
at 12500 TI Boulevard, Dallas, Texas, at 10:00 a.m. (Central time). At the meeting we will consider and act upon the following matters:
the election of directors for the next year,
•
• advisory approval of the company’s executive compensation,
• ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014,
• approval of the TI Employees 2014 Stock Purchase Plan,
• reapproval of the material terms of the performance goals under the Texas Instruments 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and
• such other matters as may properly come before the meeting.
Stockholders of record at the close of business on February 18, 2014, are entitled to vote at the annual meeting.
We urge you to vote your shares as promptly as possible by: (1) accessing the Internet website, (2) calling the toll-free number
or (3) signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy.
Dallas, Texas
March 4, 2014
Sincerely,
Joseph F. Hubach
Senior Vice President,
Secretary and
General Counsel
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 55
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENTApril 17, 2014
Audit Committee report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Proposal to ratify appointment of independent
registered public accounting firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
Proposal to approve the TI Employees
2014 Stock Purchase Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
Proposal to reapprove the material terms of the
performance goals under the Texas Instruments
2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Equity compensation plan information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
Additional information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
Voting securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
Security ownership of certain beneficial owners . . . . . . . . 100
Security ownership of directors and management . . . . . . 101
Related person transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
Compensation committee interlocks and
insider participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Cost of solicitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Stockholder proposals for 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
Benefit plan voting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance . 104
Telephone and Internet voting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
Stockholders sharing the same address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Electronic delivery of proxy materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Directions and other annual meeting information. . . . . . . . 106
Exhibit A (TI Employees 2014 Stock Purchase Plan) . . . . . . . . A-1
Exhibit B (Texas Instruments 2009 Long-Term
Incentive Plan). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1
Appendix (Non-GAAP Reconciliations) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Voting procedures and quorum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Election of directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Nominees for directorship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Director nomination process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Board diversity and nominee qualifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Communications with the board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Corporate governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Annual meeting attendance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Director independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Board organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Board and committee meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Committees of the board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Board leadership structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Risk oversight by the board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Director compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
2013 director compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Executive compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Proposal regarding advisory approval of
the company’s executive compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Compensation Discussion and Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Compensation Committee report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
2013 summary compensation table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Grants of plan-based awards in 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2013 . . . . . . . 84
2013 option exercises and stock vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
2013 pension benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
2013 non-qualified deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Potential payments upon termination or
change in control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
PROXY STATEMENT – MARCH 4, 2014
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
12500 TI BOULEVARD, DALLAS, TEXAS 75243
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 660199, DALLAS, TEXAS 75266-0199
VOTING PROCEDURES AND QUORUM
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
TI’s board of directors requests your proxy for the annual meeting of stockholders on April 17, 2014. If you sign and return the enclosed
proxy, or vote by telephone or on the Internet, you authorize the persons named in the proxy to represent you and vote your shares
for the purposes mentioned in the notice of annual meeting. This proxy statement and related proxy are being distributed on or about
March 4, 2014. If you come to the meeting, you can vote in person. If you do not come to the meeting, your shares can be voted only if
you have returned a properly signed proxy or followed the telephone or Internet voting instructions, which can be found on the enclosed
proxy. If you sign and return your proxy but do not give voting instructions, the shares represented by that proxy will be voted as
recommended by the board of directors. You can revoke your authorization at any time before the shares are voted at the meeting.
A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. If at least a majority of the shares of TI common stock issued and
outstanding and entitled to vote are present in person or by proxy, a quorum will exist. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted
as present for purposes of establishing a quorum. Broker non-votes occur when a beneficial owner who holds company stock through
a broker does not provide the broker with voting instructions as to any matter on which the broker is not permitted to exercise its
discretion and vote without specific instruction.
56 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Scheduled to be considered at the meeting are the election of directors, an advisory vote regarding approval of the company’s
executive compensation, ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, a proposal to approve
the TI Employees 2014 Stock Purchase Plan, and a proposal to reapprove the material terms of the performance goals under the Texas
Instruments 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Each of these matters is discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement. On each of these
matters you may vote “for,” “against” or “abstain.” The vote required for the election of directors and approval of the other matters is
shown in the table below.
Required Vote
Impact of Abstentions or Broker Non-Votes
Majority of votes present in person and
by proxy at the meeting and entitled to
be cast in the election with respect to a
nominee must be cast for that nominee.
Majority of votes present in person or by
proxy at the meeting must be cast for
the proposal.
Abstentions have the same effect as votes
against. Broker non-votes are not counted
as votes for or against.
Abstentions and broker non-votes have
the same effect as a vote against.
Matter
Election of directors
Advisory vote to approve named executive
officer compensation
Proposal to approve the TI Employees
2014 Stock Purchase Plan
Proposal to reapprove the material terms
of the performance goals under the
Texas Instruments 2009 Long-Term
Incentive Plan
Proposal to ratify appointment of
independent registered public
accounting firm
Majority of votes present in person or by
proxy at the meeting must be cast for
the proposal.
Any other matter that may properly be
submitted at the meeting
Majority of votes present in person or by
proxy at the meeting must be cast for
the proposal.
Abstentions have the same effect as
votes against. (Brokers are permitted
to exercise their discretion and vote
without specific instruction on this
matter. Accordingly, there are no broker
non-votes.)
Abstentions and broker non-votes have
the same effect as votes against.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 57
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Directors are elected at the annual meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting and until their successors are elected and
qualified. The board of directors has designated the following persons as nominees: RALPH W. BABB, JR., MARK A. BLINN, DANIEL A.
CARP, CARRIE S. COX, RONALD KIRK, PAMELA H. PATSLEY, ROBERT E. SANCHEZ, WAYNE R. SANDERS, RUTH J. SIMMONS, RICHARD K.
TEMPLETON and CHRISTINE TODD WHITMAN.
If you return a proxy that is not otherwise marked, your shares will be voted FOR each of the nominees.
Nominees for directorship
All of the nominees for directorship are directors of the company. For a discussion of each nominee’s qualifications to serve as a director
of the company, please see pages 59-61. If any nominee becomes unable to serve before the meeting, the persons named as proxies
may vote for a substitute or the number of directors will be reduced accordingly.
Directors
RUTH J. SIMMONS
Age 68
Director since 1999
Member, Audit Committee
RICHARD K. TEMPLETON
Age 55
Chairman since 2008 and
director since 2003
CHRISTINE TODD
WHITMAN
Age 67
Director since 2003
Chair, Governance and
Stockholder Relations
Committee
RALPH W. BABB, JR.
Age 65
Director since 2010
Chair, Audit
Committee
MARK A. BLINN
Age 52
Director since 2013
Member, Audit
Committee
DANIEL A. CARP
Age 65
Director since 1997
Member, Governance
and Stockholder
Relations Committee
CARRIE S. COX
Age 56
Director since 2004
Lead Director;
Chair, Compensation
Committee
RONALD KIRK
Age 59
Director since 2013
Member, Governance
and Stockholder
Relations Committee
PAMELA H. PATSLEY
Age 57
Director since 2004
Member,
Compensation
Committee
ROBERT E. SANCHEZ
Age 48
Director since 2011
Member,
Compensation
Committee
WAYNE R. SANDERS
Age 66
Director since 1997
Member, Governance
and Stockholder
Relations Committee
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
58 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Director nomination process
The board is responsible for approving nominees for election as directors. To assist in this task, the board has designated a standing
committee, the Governance and Stockholder Relations Committee (the G&SR Committee), which is responsible for reviewing and
recommending nominees to the board. The G&SR Committee is comprised solely of independent directors as defined by the rules of The
NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ) and the board’s corporate governance guidelines. Our board of directors has adopted a written charter
for the G&SR Committee. It can be found on our website at www.ti.com/corporategovernance.
It is a long-standing policy of the board to consider prospective board nominees recommended by stockholders. A stockholder who
wishes to recommend a prospective board nominee for the G&SR Committee’s consideration can write to the Secretary of the G&SR
Committee, Texas Instruments Incorporated, P.O. Box 655936, MS 8658, Dallas, TX 75265-5936. The G&SR Committee will evaluate the
stockholder’s prospective board nominee in the same manner as it evaluates other nominees.
In evaluating prospective nominees, the G&SR Committee looks for the following minimum qualifications, qualities and skills:
• Outstanding achievement in the individual’s personal career.
• Breadth of experience.
• Soundness of judgment.
• Ability to make independent, analytical inquiries.
• Ability to contribute to a diversity of viewpoints among board members.
• Willingness and ability to devote the time required to perform board activities adequately (in this regard, the G&SR Committee
will consider the number of other boards on which the individual serves as a director, and in particular the board’s policy that
directors should not serve on the boards of more than three other public companies).
• Ability to represent the total corporate interests of TI (a director will not be selected to, nor will he or she be expected to,
represent the interests of any particular group).
Stockholders, non-employee directors, management and others may submit recommendations to the G&SR Committee.
Mr. Kirk was elected to the board effective September 19, 2013. He is the only director nominee at the 2014 annual meeting of
stockholders who is standing for election by the stockholders for the first time. One of the independent directors identified Mr. Kirk as a
potential candidate.
The board believes its current size is within the desired range as stated in the board’s corporate governance guidelines.
Board diversity and nominee qualifications
As indicated by the criteria above, the board prefers a mix of background and experience among its members. The board does not follow
any ratio or formula to determine the appropriate mix. Rather, it uses its judgment to identify nominees whose backgrounds, attributes
and experiences, taken as a whole, will contribute to the high standards of board service at the company. The effectiveness of this
approach is evidenced by the directors’ participation in the insightful and robust yet respectful deliberation that occurs at board and
committee meetings and in shaping the agendas for those meetings.
As it considered director nominees for the 2014 annual meeting, the board kept in mind that the most important issues it considers
typically relate to the company’s strategic direction; succession planning for senior executive positions; the company’s financial
performance; the challenges of running a large, complex enterprise, including the management of its risks; major acquisitions and
divestitures; and significant research and development (R&D) and capital investment decisions. These issues arise in the context of the
company’s operations, which primarily involve the manufacture and sale of semiconductors all over the world into industrial, automotive,
personal electronics, communications equipment and enterprise systems markets.
As described below, each of our director nominees has achieved an extremely high level of success in his or her career, whether
at multi-billion dollar multinational corporate enterprises, major U.S. universities or significant governmental organizations. In these
positions, each has been directly involved in the challenges relating to setting the strategic direction and managing the financial
performance, personnel and processes of large, complex organizations. Each has had exposure to effective leaders and has developed
the ability to judge leadership qualities. Ten of them have experience in serving on the board of directors of at least one other major
corporation, and two have served in high political office, all of which provides additional relevant experience on which each nominee
can draw.
In concluding that each nominee should serve as a director, the board relied on the specific experiences and attributes listed
below and on the direct personal knowledge, born of previous service on the board, that each of the nominees brings insight and the
willingness to ask difficult questions to board deliberations.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 59
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT Mr. Babb
• As chairman and CEO of Comerica Incorporated and Comerica Bank (2002-present) and through a long career in banking, has
gained first-hand experience in managing large, complex institutions, as well as insight into financial markets, which experience
is particularly relevant to the company due to its global presence.
• As Audit Committee chair at the company, chief financial officer of Comerica Incorporated and Comerica Bank (1995-2002),
controller and later chief financial officer of Mercantile Bancorporation (1978-1995), and auditor and later audit manager at the
accounting firm of Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co. (1971-1978), has gained extensive audit knowledge and experience in audit- and
financial control-related matters.
Mr. Blinn
• As CEO and a director of Flowserve Corporation (2009-present), has gained first-hand experience in managing a large,
multinational corporation operating in global industrial markets, with ultimate management responsibility for the organization’s
financial performance and significant capital and R&D investments.
• As chief financial officer of Flowserve Corporation (2004-2009), chief financial officer of FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services
Inc. (2003-2004) and vice president and controller of Centex Corporation (2000-2002), has developed a keen appreciation for
audit- and financial control-related matters.
Mr. Carp
• As chairman and CEO (2000-2005) and president (1997-2001, 2002-2003) of Eastman Kodak Company, has gained first-
hand experience in managing a large, multinational corporation focused on worldwide electronic consumer markets (which
are of relevance to the company), with ultimate management responsibility for the corporation’s financial performance and its
significant investments in capital and R&D.
• As chairman of the board of directors of Delta Air Lines, Inc. (2007-present), a director of Norfolk Southern Corporation
(2006-present) and a former director of Liz Claiborne, Inc. (2006-2009), has helped oversee the strategy and operations of major
multinational corporations in various industries, including some that are capital-intensive.
Ms. Cox
• As chairman (2013-present), CEO and a director (2010-present) of Humacyte, Inc., executive vice president and president of
Global Pharmaceuticals at Schering-Plough Corporation (2003-2009) and executive vice president and president of Global
Prescription Business at Pharmacia Corporation (1997-2003), has gained first-hand experience in managing large, multinational
organizations focused on medical-related markets (which are of relevance to the company), with responsibility for those
organizations’ financial performance and significant capital and R&D investments. Is also a director of Cardinal Health, Inc.
(2009-present) and Celgene Corporation (2009-present).
Mr. Kirk
• As U.S. Trade Representative (2009-2013), has gained first-hand experience in managing a complex organization that operates
on an international scale and developed insight into issues bearing on global economic activity, international trade policies and
strategies and the workings of foreign governments.
• As Senior Of Counsel of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP (2013-present), and as a partner of Vinson & Elkins, LLP (2005-2009), has
gained first-hand experience as an advisor to numerous multinational companies.
• As a director of Brinker International, Inc. (1997-2009) and Dean Foods Company (1997-2009) has helped oversee the strategy
and operations of other large corporations.
Ms. Patsley
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
• As chairman and CEO (2009-present) of MoneyGram International, Inc., senior executive vice president of First Data Corporation
(2000-2007) and president and CEO of Paymentech, Inc. (1991-2000), has gained first-hand experience in managing large,
multinational organizations, including the application of technology in the financial services sector, with ultimate management
responsibility for their financial performance and significant capital investments.
• As former Audit Committee chair at the company, a member of the audit committee at Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., chief
financial officer of First USA, Inc. (1987-1994) and a former auditor at KPMG Peat Marwick for almost six years before joining
First USA, has developed a keen appreciation for audit- and financial control-related matters.
• As a director of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (2008-present) and a former director of Molson Coors Brewing Company
(2005-2009), has helped oversee the strategy and operations of other major multinational corporations.
Mr. Sanchez
• As chairman and CEO (2013-present), president (2012 to present) and chief operating officer (2012) of Ryder System, Inc.,
and as president of its Global Fleet Management Solutions business segment (2010-2012), has gained first-hand experience
in managing a large, multinational, transportation-related organization, with responsibility for the organization’s financial
performance and significant capital investments.
• As executive vice president and chief financial officer (2007-2010) and as senior vice president and chief information officer
(2003-2005) of Ryder System, Inc., has developed a keen appreciation for audit- and financial control-related issues and gained
first-hand experience with all technology-related functions of a large, multinational corporation focused on transportation
and logistics.
60 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Mr. Sanders
• As chairman (1992-2003) and CEO (1991-2002) of Kimberly-Clark Corporation, has gained first-hand experience in managing a
large, multinational consumer goods corporation, with ultimate management responsibility for its financial performance and its
significant capital and R&D investments.
• As chairman of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (2008-present) and a director of Belo Corporation (2003-2013), has helped
oversee the strategy and operations of other large corporations.
Ms. Simmons
• As president of Brown University (2001-2012) and president of Smith College (1995-2001), has gained first-hand experience in
managing large, complex institutions, and developed deep insight into the development and training of professionals, including
engineers, scientists and technologists, on whom the company relies for its next generation of employees.
• As a director of Chrysler Group LLC (2012-present) and Mondelez International, Inc. (2012-present) and as a former director of
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (2000-2010), has helped oversee the strategy and operations of other large corporations.
Mr. Templeton
• As a 33-year veteran of the semiconductor industry, serving the last 18 years at a senior level at the company, including as
chairman since 2008, CEO since 2004 and director since 2003, has developed a deep knowledge of all aspects of the company
and of the semiconductor industry.
Ms. Whitman
• As Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (2001-2003) and Governor of the state of New Jersey (1994-2000),
has gained first-hand experience managing a large, complex organization and developed keen insight into the workings of
government on the federal and state level and how they might impact company operations.
• As a director of S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (2003-present) and United Technologies Corp. (2003-present), has helped oversee the
strategy and operations of other large corporations.
Communications with the board
Stockholders and others who wish to communicate with the board as a whole, or to individual directors, may write to them at:
P.O. Box 655936, MS 8658, Dallas, TX 75265-5936. All communications sent to this address will be shared with the board or the
individual director, if so addressed.
Corporate governance
The board has a long-standing commitment to responsible and effective corporate governance. The board’s corporate governance
guidelines (which include the director independence standards), the charters of each of the board’s committees, TI’s code of business
conduct and our code of ethics for our CEO and senior financial officers are available on our website at www.ti.com/corporategovernance.
Stockholders may request copies of these documents free of charge by writing to Texas Instruments Incorporated, P.O. Box 660199,
MS 8657, Dallas, TX 75266-0199, Attn: Investor Relations.
Annual meeting attendance
It is a policy of the board to encourage directors to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. Such attendance allows for direct
interaction between stockholders and board members. In 2013, all directors then in office attended TI’s annual meeting of stockholders.
Director independence
The board has determined that each of our directors is independent except for Mr. Templeton. In connection with this determination,
information was reviewed regarding directors’ business and charitable affiliations, directors’ immediate family members and their
employers, and any transactions or arrangements between the company and such persons or entities. The board has adopted the
following standards for determining independence.
A. In no event will a director be considered independent if:
1. He or she is a current partner of or is employed by the company’s independent auditors;
2. A family member of the director is (a) a current partner of the company’s independent auditors or (b) currently employed by the
company’s independent auditors and personally works on the company’s audit;
3. Within the current or preceding three fiscal years he or she was, and remains at the time of the determination, a partner in or a
controlling shareholder, an executive officer or an employee of an organization that in the current year or any of the past three fiscal
years (a) made payments to, or received payments from, the company for property or services, (b) extended loans to or received
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 61
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT loans from, the company, or (c) received charitable contributions from the company, in an amount or amounts which, in the
aggregate in such fiscal year, exceeded the greater of $200,000 or 2 percent of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for that
year (for purposes of this standard, “payments” excludes payments arising solely from investments in the company’s securities and
payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs); or
4. Within the current or preceding three fiscal years a family member of the director was, and remains at the time of the
determination, a partner in or a controlling shareholder or an executive officer of an organization that in the current year or any of
the past three fiscal years (a) made payments to, or received payments from, the company for property or services, (b) extended
loans to or received loans from the company, or (c) received charitable contributions from the company, in an amount or amounts
which, in the aggregate in such fiscal year, exceeded the greater of $200,000 or 2 percent of the recipient’s consolidated gross
revenues for that year (for purposes of this standard, “payments” excludes payments arising solely from investments in the
company’s securities and payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs).
B. In no event will a director be considered independent if, within the preceding three years:
1. He or she was employed by the company (except in the capacity of interim chairman of the board, chief executive officer or other
executive officer, provided the interim employment did not last longer than one year);
2. He or she received more than $120,000 during any twelve-month period in compensation from the company (other than
(a) compensation for board or board committee service, (b) compensation received for former service lasting no longer than one year
as an interim chairman of the board, chief executive officer or other executive officer and (c) benefits under a tax-qualified retirement
plan, or non-discretionary compensation);
3. A family member of the director was employed as an executive officer by the company;
4. A family member of the director received more than $120,000 during any twelve-month period in compensation from the company
(excluding compensation as a non-executive officer employee of the company);
5. He or she was (but is no longer) a partner or employee of the company’s independent auditors and worked on the company’s audit
within that time;
6. A family member of the director was (but is no longer) a partner or employee of the company’s independent auditors and worked on
the company’s audit within that time;
7. He or she was an executive officer of another entity at which any of the company’s current executive officers at any time during the
past three years served on that entity’s compensation committee; or
8. A family member of the director was an executive officer of another entity at which any of the company’s current executive officers at
any time during the past three years served on that entity’s compensation committee.
C. No member of the Audit Committee may accept directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the
company, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the board or any board committee. Compensatory fees do not include the
receipt of fixed amounts of compensation under a retirement plan (including deferred compensation) for prior service with the company
(provided that such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service). In addition, no member of the Audit Committee
may be an affiliated person of the company except in his or her capacity as a director.
D. With respect to service on the Compensation Committee, the board will consider all factors that it deems relevant to determining
whether a director has a relationship to the company that is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in
connection with the duties of a Compensation Committee member, including but not limited to:
1. The source of compensation of the director, including any consulting, advisory or compensatory fee paid by the company to the
director; and
2. Whether the director is affiliated with the company, a subsidiary of the company or an affiliate of a subsidiary of the company.
E. For any other relationship, the determination of whether it would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in
carrying out his or her responsibilities, and consequently whether the director involved is independent, will be made by directors who
satisfy the independence criteria set forth in this section.
For purposes of these independence determinations, “company” and “family member” will have the same meaning as under
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
NASDAQ rules.
BOARD ORGANIzATION
Board and committee meetings
During 2013, the board held nine meetings. The board has three standing committees described below. The committees of the board
collectively held 19 meetings in 2013. Each director attended all of the board and relevant committee meetings combined. Overall
attendance at board and committee meetings was 100 percent.
62 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Committees of the board
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is a separately designated standing committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All members of the Audit Committee are independent under NASDAQ rules and the board’s
corporate governance guidelines. From April 20, 2012, to April 18, 2013, the committee members were Ms. Patsley (Chair), Mr. Babb and
Mr. Sanchez. Since April 19, 2013, the committee members have been Mr. Babb (Chair), Mr. Blinn and Ms. Simmons. The Audit Committee
is generally responsible for:
• Appointing, compensating, retaining and overseeing TI’s independent registered public accounting firm.
• Reviewing the annual report of TI’s independent registered public accounting firm related to quality control.
• Reviewing TI’s annual reports to the SEC, including the financial statements and the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis”
portion of those reports, and recommending appropriate action to the board.
• Reviewing TI’s audit plans.
• Reviewing before issuance TI’s news releases regarding annual and interim financial results and discussing with management
any related earnings guidance that may be provided to analysts and rating agencies.
• Discussing TI’s audited financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, including
a discussion with the firm regarding the matters required to be reviewed under applicable legal or regulatory requirements.
• Reviewing relationships between the independent registered public accounting firm and TI.
• Reviewing and discussing the adequacy of TI’s internal accounting controls and other factors affecting the integrity of TI’s
financial reports with management and with the independent registered public accounting firm.
• Creating and periodically reviewing TI’s whistleblower policy.
• Reviewing TI’s risk assessment and risk management policies.
• Reviewing TI’s compliance and ethics program.
• Reviewing a report of compliance of management and operating personnel with TI’s code of business conduct, including TI’s
conflict of interest policy.
• Reviewing TI’s non-employee-related insurance programs.
• Reviewing changes, if any, in major accounting policies of the company.
• Reviewing trends in accounting policy changes that are relevant to the company.
• Reviewing the company’s policy regarding investments and financial derivative products.
The board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are financially sophisticated, as the board has interpreted
such qualifications in its business judgment. In addition, the board has designated Mr. Babb as the audit committee financial expert as
defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The Audit Committee met six times in 2013. The Audit Committee holds regularly scheduled meetings and reports its activities to
the board. The committee also continued its long-standing practice of meeting directly with our internal audit staff to discuss the audit
plan and to allow for direct interaction between Audit Committee members and our internal auditors. Please see page 93 for a report of
the committee.
Compensation Committee
All members of the Compensation Committee are independent. From April 20, 2012, to April 18, 2013, the committee members were
Ms. Cox (Chair), Mr. Sanders and Ms. Simmons. Since April 19, 2013, the committee members have been Ms. Cox (Chair), Ms. Patsley
and Mr. Sanchez. The committee is responsible for:
• Reviewing the performance of the CEO and determining his compensation.
• Setting the compensation of the company’s other executive officers.
• Overseeing administration of employee benefit plans.
• Making recommendations to the board regarding:
○
Institution and termination of, revisions in and actions under employee benefit plans that (i) increase benefits only for
officers of the company or disproportionately increase benefits for officers of the company more than other employees of the
company, (ii) require or permit the issuance of the company’s stock or (iii) the board must approve.
○ Reservation of company stock for use as awards of grants under plans or as contributions or sales to any trustee of any
employee benefit plan.
• Taking action as appropriate regarding the institution and termination of, revisions in and actions under employee benefit plans
that are not required to be approved by the board.
• Appointing, setting the compensation of, overseeing and considering the independence of any compensation consultant or
other advisor.
The Compensation Committee holds regularly scheduled meetings, reports its activities to the board, and consults with the
board before setting annual executive compensation. During 2013, the committee met six times. Please see page 81 for a report of
the committee.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 63
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT In performing its functions, the committee is supported by the company’s Human Resources organization. The committee has the
authority to retain any advisors it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. The committee retained Pearl Meyer & Partners as
its compensation consultant for the 2013 compensation cycle. The committee instructed the consultant to advise it directly on executive
compensation philosophy, strategies, pay levels, decision-making processes and other matters within the scope of the committee’s
charter. Additionally, the committee instructed the consultant to assist the company’s Human Resources organization in its support
of the committee in these matters with such items as peer-group assessment, analysis of the executive compensation market, and
compensation recommendations.
The Compensation Committee considers it important that its compensation consultant’s objectivity not be compromised by other
engagements with the company or its management. In support of this belief, the committee has a policy on compensation consultants,
a copy of which may be found on www.ti.com/corporategovernance. During 2013, the committee determined that its compensation
consultant was independent of the company and had no conflict of interest.
The Compensation Committee considers executive compensation in a multistep process that involves the review of market
information, performance data and possible compensation levels over several meetings leading to the annual determinations in January.
Before setting executive compensation, the committee reviews the total compensation and benefits of the executive officers and
considers the impact that their retirement, or termination under various other scenarios, would have on their compensation and benefits.
The CEO and the senior vice president responsible for Human Resources, who is an executive officer, are regularly invited to
attend meetings of the committee. The CEO is excused from the meeting during any deliberations or vote on his compensation. No
executive officer determines his or her own compensation or the compensation of any other executive officer. As members of the
board, the members of the committee receive information concerning the performance of the company during the year and interact
with our management. The CEO gives the committee and the board an assessment of his own performance during the year just ended.
He also reviews the performance of the other executive officers with the committee and makes recommendations regarding their
compensation. The senior vice president responsible for Human Resources assists in the preparation of and reviews the compensation
recommendations made to the committee other than for her compensation.
The Compensation Committee’s charter provides that it may delegate its power, authority and rights with respect to TI’s long-term
incentive plans, employee stock purchase plan and employee benefit plans to (i) one or more committees of the board established or
delegated authority for that purpose; or (ii) employees or committees of employees except that no such delegation may be made with
respect to compensation of the company’s executive officers.
Pursuant to that authority, the Compensation Committee has delegated to a special committee established by the board the
authority to grant a limited number of stock options and restricted stock units under the company’s long-term incentive plans. The sole
member of the special committee is Mr. Templeton. The special committee has no authority to grant, amend or terminate any form of
compensation to TI’s executive officers. The Compensation Committee reviews the grant activity of the special committee.
Governance and Stockholder Relations Committee
All members of the G&SR Committee are independent. From April 20, 2012, to April 18, 2013, the committee members were
Ms. Whitman (Chair) and Mr. Carp. Since April 19, 2013, the committee members have been Ms. Whitman (Chair), Mr. Carp and
Mr. Sanders, with Mr. Kirk joining the committee on September 19, 2013. The G&SR Committee is generally responsible for:
• Making recommendations to the board regarding:
○ The development and revision of our corporate governance principles.
○ The size, composition and functioning of the board and board committees.
○ Candidates to fill board positions.
○ Nominees to be designated for election as directors.
○ Compensation of board members.
○ Organization and responsibilities of board committees.
○ Succession planning by the company.
○
○ Election of executive officers of the company.
○ Topics affecting the relationship between the company and stockholders.
○ Public issues likely to affect the company.
○ Responses to proposals submitted by stockholders.
Issues of potential conflicts of interest involving a board member raised under TI’s conflict of interest policy.
• Reviewing:
○ Contribution policies of the company and the TI Foundation.
○ Revisions to TI’s code of ethics.
• Electing officers of the company other than the executive officers.
• Overseeing an annual evaluation of the board and the committee.
The G&SR Committee met seven times in 2013. The G&SR Committee holds regularly scheduled meetings and reports its activities
to the board. Please see page 59 for a discussion of stockholder nominations and page 61 for a discussion of communications with
the board.
64 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Board leadership structure
The board’s current leadership structure combines the positions of chairman and CEO, and includes a lead director who presides at
executive sessions and performs the duties listed below. The board believes that this structure, combined with its other practices (such
as (a) including on each board agenda an opportunity for the independent directors to comment on and influence the proposed strategic
agenda for future meetings and (b) holding an executive session at each board meeting), allows it to maintain the active engagement of
independent directors and appropriate oversight of management.
The lead director is elected by the independent directors annually. The independent directors have elected Ms. Cox to serve as lead
director. The duties of the lead director are to:
• Preside at all meetings of the board at which the chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the
independent directors;
• Serve as liaison between the chairman and the independent directors;
• Approve information sent to the board;
• Approve meeting agendas for the board;
• Approve meeting schedules to assure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items; and
•
If requested by major shareholders, ensure that he or she is available for consultation and direct communication.
In addition, the lead director has authority to call meetings of the independent directors.
The board, led by its G&SR Committee, regularly reviews the board’s leadership structure. The board’s consideration is guided by
two questions: would stockholders be better served and would the board be more effective with a different structure. The board’s views
are informed by a review of the practices of other companies and insight into the preferences of top stockholders, as gathered from
face-to-face dialogue and review of published guidelines. The board also considers how board roles and interactions would change if its
leadership structure changed. The board’s goal is for each director to have an equal stake in the board’s actions and equal accountability
to the corporation and its stockholders.
The board continues to believe that there is no uniform solution for a board leadership structure. Indeed, the company has had
varying board leadership models over its history, at times separating the positions of chairman and CEO and at times combining the two,
and now utilizing a lead director.
Risk oversight by the board
It is management’s responsibility to assess and manage the various risks TI faces. It is the board’s responsibility to oversee
management in this effort. In exercising its oversight, the board has allocated some areas of focus to its committees and has retained
areas of focus for itself, as more fully described below.
Management generally views the risks TI faces as falling into the following categories: strategic, operational, financial and
compliance. The board as a whole has oversight responsibility for the company’s strategic and operational risks (e.g., major initiatives,
competitive markets and products, sales and marketing, and research and development). Throughout the year the CEO discusses these
risks with the board during strategy reviews that focus on a particular business or function. In addition, at the end of the year, the CEO
provides a formal report on the top strategic and operational risks.
TI’s Audit Committee has oversight responsibility for financial risk (such as accounting, finance, internal controls and tax strategy).
Oversight responsibility for compliance risk is shared by the board committees. For example, the Audit Committee oversees compliance
with the company’s code of conduct and finance- and accounting-related laws and policies, as well as the company’s compliance
program itself; the Compensation Committee oversees compliance with the company’s executive compensation plans and related
laws and policies; and the G&SR Committee oversees compliance with governance-related laws and policies, including the company’s
corporate governance guidelines.
The Audit Committee oversees the company’s approach to risk management as a whole. It reviews the company’s risk management
process at least annually by means of a presentation by the CFO.
The board’s leadership structure is consistent with the board and committees’ roles in risk oversight. As discussed above, the board
has found that its current structure and practices are effective in fully engaging the independent directors. Allocating various aspects of
risk oversight among the committees provides for similar engagement. Having the chairman and CEO review strategic and operational
risks with the board ensures that the director most knowledgeable about the company, the industry in which it operates and the
competition and other challenges it faces shares those insights with the board, providing for a thorough and efficient process.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 65
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The G&SR Committee has responsibility for reviewing and making recommendations to the board on compensation for non-employee
directors, with the board making the final determination. The committee has no authority to delegate its responsibility regarding
director compensation. In carrying out this responsibility, it is supported by TI’s Human Resources organization. The CEO, the senior vice
president responsible for Human Resources and the Secretary review the recommendations made to the committee. The CEO also votes,
as a member of the board, on the compensation of non-employee directors.
The compensation arrangements for the non-employee directors are:
• Annual retainer of $80,000 for board and committee service.
• Additional annual retainer of $25,000 for service as the lead director.
• Additional annual retainer of $30,000 for service as chair of the Audit Committee; $20,000 for service as chair of the
Compensation Committee; and $15,000 for service as chair of the G&SR Committee.
• Annual grant of a 10-year option to purchase TI common stock pursuant to the terms of the Texas Instruments 2009 Director
Compensation Plan (Director Plan), which was approved by stockholders in April 2009. The grant date value is $100,000,
determined using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model (subject to the board’s ability to adjust the grant downward). These
non-qualified options become exercisable in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant
and also will become fully exercisable in the event of termination of service following a change in control (as defined in the
Director Plan) of TI. If a director’s service terminates due to death, disability or ineligibility to stand for re-election under the
company’s by-laws, or after the director has completed eight years of service, then all outstanding options held by the director
shall continue to full term. If a director’s service terminates for any other reason, all outstanding options held by the director
shall be exercisable for 30 days after the date of termination, but only to the extent such options were exercisable on the date
of termination.
• Annual grant of restricted stock units pursuant to the Director Plan with a grant date value of $100,000 (subject to the board’s
ability to adjust the grant downward). The restricted stock units vest on the fourth anniversary of their date of grant and upon a
change in control as defined in the Director Plan. If a director is not a member of the board on the fourth anniversary of the grant,
restricted stock units will nonetheless settle (i.e., the shares will issue) on such anniversary date if the director has completed
eight years of service prior to termination or the director’s termination was due to death, disability or ineligibility to stand for
re-election under the company’s by-laws. The director may defer settlement of the restricted stock units at his or her election.
Upon settlement, the director will receive one share of TI common stock for each restricted stock unit. Dividend equivalents
are paid on the restricted stock units at the same rate as dividends on TI common stock. The director may defer receipt of
dividend equivalents.
• $1,000 per day compensation for other activities designated by the chairman.
• A one-time grant of 2,000 restricted stock units upon a director’s initial election to the board.
The board has determined that grants of equity compensation to non-employee directors will be timed to occur when grants are made
to our U.S. employees in connection with the annual compensation review process. Accordingly, such equity grants to non-employee
directors are made in January. Please see the discussion regarding the timing of equity compensation grants on page 78.
Directors are not paid a fee for meeting attendance, but we reimburse non-employee directors for their travel, lodging and related
expenses incurred in connection with attending board, committee and stockholders meetings and other designated TI events. In
addition, non-employee directors may travel on company aircraft to and from these meetings and other designated events. On occasion,
directors’ spouses are invited to attend board events; the spouses’ expenses incurred in connection with attendance at those events are
also reimbursed.
Under the Director Plan, some directors have chosen to defer all or part of their cash compensation until they leave the board (or
certain other specified times). These deferred amounts were credited to either a cash account or stock unit account. Cash accounts
earn interest from TI at a rate currently based on Moody’s Seasoned Aaa Corporate Bonds. For 2013, that rate was 3.42 percent. Stock
unit accounts fluctuate in value with the underlying shares of TI common stock, which will be issued after the deferral period. Dividend
equivalents are paid on these stock units. Directors may also defer settlement of the restricted stock units they receive.
We have arrangements with certain customers whereby our employees may purchase consumer products containing TI components
at discounted pricing. In addition, the TI Foundation has an educational and cultural matching gift program. In both cases, directors are
entitled to participate on the same terms and conditions available to employees.
Non-employee directors are not eligible to participate in any TI-sponsored pension plan.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
66 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
2013 director compensation
The following table shows the compensation of all persons who were non-employee members of the board during 2013 for services in
all capacities to TI in 2013.
Name
R. W. Babb, Jr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M. A. Blinn (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D. A. Carp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. S. Cox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. Kirk (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
P. H. Patsley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. E. Sanchez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
W. R. Sanders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. J. Simmons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. T. Whitman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fees Earned or
Paid in
Cash ($)(2)
$100,000
$ 68,571
$ 80,000
$116,667
$ 22,667
$ 98,333
$ 80,000
$ 80,000
$ 80,000
$ 95,000
Stock
Awards
($)(3)
Option
Awards
($)(4)
$99,974 $99,995
$64,960
—
$99,974 $99,995
$99,974 $99,995
$81,600
—
$99,974 $99,995
$99,974 $99,995
$99,974 $99,995
$99,974 $99,995
$99,974 $99,995
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings (5)
All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
—
—
—
$ 2,617
—
—
—
—
$ 551
—
$
20
$10,020
703
$
20
$
20
$
$
20
$10,020
703
$
$ 5,020
$ 1,020
Total ($)
$299,989
$143,551
$280,672
$319,273
$104,287
$298,322
$289,989
$280,672
$285,540
$295,989
(1) Mr. Blinn was elected effective February 21, 2013, and Mr. Kirk was elected effective September 19, 2013.
(2) Includes amounts deferred at the director’s election.
(3) Shown is the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted in 2013 calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification™ Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (ASC 718). The discussion of
the assumptions used for purposes of calculating the grant date fair value appears in Note 5 of Exhibit 13 to TI’s annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The table below shows the aggregate number of shares underlying outstanding restricted stock units held by the named individuals
as of December 31, 2013.
Name
R. W. Babb, Jr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M. A. Blinn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D. A. Carp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. S. Cox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. Kirk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
P. H. Patsley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. E. Sanchez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
W. R. Sanders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. J. Simmons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. T. Whitman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted
Stock Units
(in Shares)
11,025
2,000
27,689
21,025
2,000
13,525
8,138
21,125
27,025
21,025
Each restricted stock unit represents the right to receive one share of TI common stock. For restricted stock units granted prior to
2007, shares are issued at the time of mandatory retirement from the board (age 70) or upon the earlier of termination of service
from the board after completing eight years of service or death or disability. For information regarding share issuances under
restricted stock units granted after 2006, please see the discussion on page 66.
(4) Shown is the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted in 2013 calculated in accordance with ASC 718. The discussion of
the assumptions used for purposes of calculating the grant date fair value appears in Note 5 of Exhibit 13 to TI’s annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 67
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT
The table below shows the aggregate number of shares underlying outstanding stock options held by the named individuals as of
December 31, 2013.
Name
R. W. Babb, Jr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M. A. Blinn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D. A. Carp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. S. Cox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. Kirk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
P. H. Patsley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. E. Sanchez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
W. R. Sanders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. J. Simmons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. T. Whitman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Options
(in Shares)
36,907
—
79,907
79,907
—
94,907
26,905
74,657
72,907
94,907
The terms of these options are as set forth on page 66 except that for options granted before November 2006, the exercise price
is the average of the high and low price of TI common stock on the date of grant, and for options granted before 2010, the grant
becomes fully exercisable upon a change in control of TI.
(5) SEC rules require the disclosure of earnings on deferred compensation to the extent that the interest rate exceeds a specified
rate (Federal Rate), which is 120 percent of the applicable federal long-term interest rate with compounding. Under the terms of
the Director Plan, deferred compensation cash amounts earn interest at a rate based on Moody’s Seasoned Aaa corporate bonds.
For 2013, this interest rate exceeded the Federal Rate by 0.83 percentage points. Shown is the amount of interest earned on the
directors’ deferred compensation accounts that was in excess of the Federal Rate.
(6) Consists of (a) the annual cost ($20 per director) of premiums for travel and accident insurance policies, (b) contributions under
the TI Foundation matching gift program of $10,000 for Messrs. Sanchez and Blinn, $5,000 for Ms. Simmons and $1,000 for Ms.
Whitman and (c) for Messrs. Carp and Sanders, third-party administration fees for the Director Award Program. Each director whose
service commenced prior to June 20, 2002, is eligible to participate in the Director Award Program, a charitable donation program
under which we will contribute a total of $500,000 per eligible director to as many as three educational institutions recommended
by the director and approved by us. The contributions are made following the director’s death. Directors receive no financial benefit
from the program, and all charitable deductions belong to the company. In accordance with SEC rules, we have included the
company’s annual costs under the program in All Other Compensation of the directors who participate. The cost attributable to each
of Messrs. Carp and Sanders for their participation in this program was $683.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
We are providing the following advisory vote on named executive officer compensation as required by Section 14A of the Securities
Exchange Act. The company holds this vote annually.
Proposal regarding advisory approval of the company’s executive compensation
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
The board asks the shareholders to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. The “named executive
officers” are the chief executive officer, chief financial officer and three other most highly compensated executive officers, as named in
the compensation tables on pages 81-93.
Specifically, we ask the shareholders to approve the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant
to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion on pages 69-93 of this proxy statement, is hereby approved.
We encourage shareholders to review the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the proxy statement, which follows. It
discusses our executive compensation policies and programs and explains the compensation decisions relating to the named executive
officers for 2013. We believe that the policies and programs serve the interests of our shareholders and that the compensation received
by the named executive officers is commensurate with the performance and strategic position of the company.
Although the outcome of this vote is not binding on the company or the board, the Compensation Committee of the board will
consider it when setting future compensation for the executive officers.
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR the resolution approving the named executive officer compensation for
2013, as disclosed in this proxy statement.
68 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This section describes TI’s compensation program for executive officers. It will provide insight into the following:
• The elements of the 2013 compensation program, why we selected them and how they relate to one another; and
• How we determined the amount of compensation for 2013.
Currently, TI has 14 executive officers. These executives have the broadest job responsibilities and policy-making authority in
the company. We hold them accountable for the company’s performance and for maintaining a culture of strong ethics. Details of
compensation for our CEO, CFO and the three other highest paid individuals who were executive officers in 2013 (collectively called the
“named executive officers”) can be found in the tables beginning on page 81.
Executive summary
• TI’s compensation program is structured to pay for performance and deliver rewards that encourage executives to
think and act in both the short- and long-term interests of our shareholders. The majority of total compensation for
our executives each year comes in the form of variable cash and equity compensation. Variable cash is tied to the
short-term performance of the company, and the value of equity is tied to the long-term performance of the company.
We believe our compensation program holds our executive officers accountable for the financial and competitive
performance of TI.
• 2013 compensation decisions for the CEO:
○ Base salary was increased by 3.4 percent over 2012.
○ The grant date fair value of equity compensation awarded in 2013 was 2 percent higher than in 2012. The number of shares
was 11 percent higher than in 2012.
○ The bonus decision was based primarily on the following performance results in 2013:
2013 Absolute Performance
2013 Relative Performance**
Revenue Growth: Total TI
Revenue Growth without legacy wireless products*
Profit from Operations as a % of Revenue (PFO%)
Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
-4.8%
0.9%
23.2%
46.3%
Below Median
Above Median
Above Median
Above Median
Year-on-Year Change in CEO Bonus
(2013 bonus compared to 2012)
11% change
* Revenue growth for total TI excluding wireless product lines that, as of year-end 2013, we have exited. See note 3 on page 75.
** Relative to semiconductor competitors as outlined on page 74. Includes estimates and projections of certain competitors’
financial results.
• Our executive compensation program is designed to encourage executive officers to pursue strategies that serve the interests of
the company and shareholders, and not to promote excessive risk-taking by our executives. It is built on a foundation of sound
corporate governance and includes:
○ Executive officers do not have employment contracts and are not guaranteed salary increases or bonus amounts.
○ We have never repriced stock options. We do not grant reload options. We grant equity compensation with double-trigger
change-in-control terms, which accelerate the vesting of grants only if the grantee has been terminated involuntarily within a
limited time after a change in control of the company.
○ Bonus and equity compensation awards are subject to clawback under the committee’s policy described on page 78.
○ We do not provide excessive perquisites. We provide no tax gross-ups for perquisites.
○ We do not guarantee a return or provide above-market returns on compensation that has been deferred.
○ Pension benefits are calculated on salary and bonus only; the proceeds earned on equity or other performance awards are
not part of the pension calculation.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 69
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT The committee’s strategy for setting cash and non-cash compensation is described in the table that follows immediately below. Its
compensation decisions for the named executive officers for 2013 are discussed on pages 71-78. Benefit programs in which the
executive officers participate are discussed on pages 79-80. Perquisites are discussed on page 80.
Detailed discussion
Compensation philosophy and elements
The Compensation Committee of TI’s board of directors is responsible for setting the compensation of all TI executive officers. The
committee consults with the other independent directors and its compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer & Partners, before setting annual
compensation for the executives. The committee chair regularly reports on committee actions at board meetings.
The primary elements of our executive compensation program are as follows:
Near-term compensation, paid in cash
Element
Base salary
Basic, least variable form of
compensation
Purpose
Strategy
Pay below market median in order
to weight total compensation to the
performance-based elements described
below in this chart.
Pay according to a formula that focuses
employees on a company goal, and at a
level that will affect behavior. Profit sharing
is paid in addition to any performance
bonus awarded for the year.
For the last nine years, the formula
has been based on company-level annual
operating profit margin. The formula was
set by the TI board. The committee’s
practice has been not to adjust amounts
earned under the formula.
Terms
Paid twice monthly
Payable in a single cash payment
shortly after the end of the
performance year
As in recent years, the
formula for 2013 was:
• Below 10% company-level
annual operating profit as
a percentage of revenue
(“Margin”): no profit sharing
• At 10% Margin: profit sharing
= 2% of base salary
• At Margin above 10%: profit
sharing increases by 0.5%
of base salary for each
percentage point of Margin
between 10% and 24%, and
1% of base salary for each
percentage point of Margin
above 24%. The maximum
profit sharing is 20% of
base salary.
In 2013, TI delivered Margin of
23.2%. As a result, all eligible
employees, including executive
officers, received profit sharing of
8.6% of base salary.
Profit sharing
Broad-based program designed
to emphasize that each employee
contributes to the company’s
profitability and can share in it
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
70 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Element
Performance
bonus
Purpose
Strategy
Terms
To motivate executives and
reward them according to the
company’s relative and absolute
performance and the executive’s
individual performance
Determined by the committee
and paid in a single payment
after the performance year
Determined primarily on the basis of one-
year and three-year company performance
on certain measures (revenue growth
percent, operating margin and total
shareholder return1) as compared to
competitors and on our strategic progress
in key markets and with customers. These
factors have been chosen to reflect our
near-term financial performance as well
as our progress in building long-term
shareholder value.
The committee aims to pay total
cash compensation (base salary, profit
sharing and bonus) appropriately above
median if company performance is above
that of competitors, and pay total cash
compensation appropriately below the
median if company performance is below
competitors.
The committee does not rely on
formulas or performance targets or
thresholds. Instead it uses its judgment
based on its assessment of the factors
described above.
Long-term compensation, awarded in equity
Stock options
and restricted
stock units
Alignment with shareholders;
long-term focus; retention,
particularly with respect to
restricted stock units
We grant a combination of nonqualified
(NQ) stock options and restricted stock
units, generally targeted at the median
level of equity compensation awarded
to executives in similar positions at the
Comparator Group.
The terms and conditions of
stock options and restricted
stock units are summarized on
pages 85-86. The committee’s
grant procedures are described
on page 78.
Comparator group
The Compensation Committee considers the market level of compensation when setting the salary, bonuses and equity compensation
of the executive officers. The committee targets salary below market median in order to weight total compensation to performance-
based elements. To estimate the market level of pay, the committee uses information provided by its compensation consultant and TI’s
Compensation and Benefits organization about compensation paid to executives in similar positions at a peer group of companies (the
“Comparator Group”).
1 Total shareholder return refers to the percentage change in the value of a stockholder’s investment in a company over the relevant
time period, as determined by dividends paid and the change in the company’s share price during the period. See page 76.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 71
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT The committee sets the Comparator Group. In general, the Comparator Group companies (1) are U.S.-based, (2) engage in the
semiconductor business or other electronics or information technology activities, (3) have executive positions comparable in complexity
to those of TI and (4) use forms of executive compensation comparable to TI’s.
Shown in the table below is the Comparator Group used for the compensation decisions for 2013.
Analog Devices, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc.
Broadcom Corporation
Computer Sciences Corporation
eBay Inc.
EMC Corporation
Emerson Electric Co.
Intel Corporation
* Removed in July 2013.
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Oracle Corporation*
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Seagate Technology
TE Connectivity Ltd.
Western Digital Corporation
Xerox Corporation
The committee set the Comparator Group in July 2012 for the base salary and equity compensation decisions it made in January 2013.
For a discussion of the factors considered by the committee in setting the Comparator Group, please see page 71 of the company’s
2013 proxy statement.
In July 2013, the committee conducted its regular review of the Comparator Group in terms of industry, revenue and market
capitalization. With the advice of its compensation consultant, and to increase the group’s overall comparability to TI, the committee
removed Oracle, which was at the upper end of the revenue and market capitalization ranges, from the Comparator Group. The
committee used that Comparator Group for the bonus decisions in January 2014 relating to 2013 performance. The table below
compares the group to TI in terms of revenue and market capitalization.
Company
Revenue
($ billion)*
Market Cap
($ billion)*
Intel Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QUALCOMM Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Emerson Electric Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EMC Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Xerox Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
eBay Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Western Digital Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Seagate Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Computer Sciences Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TE Connectivity Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Motorola Solutions, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Broadcom Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Applied Materials, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Analog Devices, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Median . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Texas Instruments Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
52.7
24.9
24.7
23.2
21.4
16.0
15.3
14.0
13.6
13.5
8.7
8.3
7.5
2.6
14.6
12.2
121.4
115.7
47.4
49.9
13.2
68.4
17.1
15.6
7.6
21.5
16.6
14.1
21.2
15.5
19.1
47.0
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
* Trailing four-quarter revenue as reported by Thomson Reuters on January 31, 2014. Market capitalization as of December 31, 2013.
Analysis of compensation determinations for 2013
Total compensation – Before finalizing the compensation of the executive officers, the committee reviewed all elements of
compensation. The information included total cash compensation (salary, profit sharing and projected bonus), the grant date fair value
of equity compensation, the impact that proposed compensation would have on other compensation elements such as pension, and a
summary of benefits that the executives would receive under various termination scenarios. The review enabled the committee to see
how various compensation elements relate to one another and what impact its decisions would have on the total earnings opportunity
of the executives. In assessing the information, the committee did not target a specific level of total compensation or use a formula to
allocate compensation among the various elements. Instead, it used its judgment in assessing whether the total was consistent with the
objectives of the program. Based on this review, the committee determined that the level of compensation was appropriate.
72 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Base salary – The committee set the 2013 rate of base salary for the named executive officers as follows:
Officer
2013 Annual Rate
Change from 2012 Annual Rate
R. K. Templeton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. P. March . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. T. Crutcher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. J. Ritchie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. G. Delagi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,075,000
$ 610,000
$ 675,000
$ 625,000
$ 625,000
3.4%
3.4%
7.1%*
4.2%
4.2%*
* 2012 annual rate includes salary increase in June 2012, when Mr. Crutcher and Mr. Delagi assumed new responsibilities.
The committee set the 2013 base-salary rate for each of the named executive officers in January 2013. In keeping with its strategy, the
committee set the annual base-salary rates to be below the estimated median level of salaries expected to be paid to similarly situated
executives of the Comparator Group in 2013.
The salary differences between the named executive officers were driven primarily by the market rate of pay for each officer, and
not the application of a formula designed to maintain a differential between the officers.
Equity compensation – In 2013, the committee awarded equity compensation to each of the named executive officers. The grants are
shown in the grants of plan-based awards in 2013 table on page 83. The grant date fair value of the awards is reflected in that table
and in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns of the summary compensation table on page 81. The table below is provided
to assist the reader in comparing the number of shares, grant date fair values and “NQ Equivalent” levels for each of the years shown in
the summary compensation table. NQ Equivalents were calculated by treating each restricted stock unit as 3 NQ Equivalents and each
option share as 1 NQ Equivalent. This 3:1 ratio is consistent with the committee’s past practice.
Officer
Year
Stock Options
(In Shares)
R. K. Templeton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013
2012
2011
K. P. March . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013
2012
2011
B. T. Crutcher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013
2012
K. J. Ritchie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011
2013
2012
2011
R. G. Delagi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013
2012
525,000
475,000
450,000
150,000
150,000
137,500
225,000
187,500
—
162,500
200,000
175,000
162,500
200,000
175,000
—
Restricted
Stock Units
(In Shares)
175,000
158,334
150,000
50,000
50,000
45,834
75,000
62,500
100,000**
54,167
66,667
58,334
54,167
66,667
58,334
50,000**
NQ Equivalents
1,050,000
950,002
900,000
300,000
300,000
275,002
450,000
375,000
300,000**
325,001
400,001
350,002
325,001
Grant Date
Fair Value*
$9,299,374
$9,074,035
$9,883,575
$2,656,964
$2,865,478
$3,020,004
$3,985,446
$3,581,848
$2,760,000**
$3,569,080
$3,542,630
$3,343,079
$3,569,080
400,001
350,002
150,000**
$3,542,630
$3,343,079
$1,380,000**
* See notes 2 and 3 to the summary compensation table on page 81 for information on how grant date fair value was calculated.
** Retention grant made in June 2012, when Mr. Crutcher and Mr. Delagi assumed new responsibilities.
In January 2013, the committee awarded equity compensation to each of the named executive officers. The committee’s objective was
to award to those officers equity compensation that had a grant date fair value at approximately the median market level, in this case
the 40th to 60th percentile of the 3-year average of equity compensation (including an estimate of amounts for 2013) granted by the
Comparator Group.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 73
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT In assessing the market level, the committee considered information presented by TI’s Compensation and Benefits organization
(prepared using data provided by the committee’s compensation consultant) on the estimated value of the awards expected to be
granted by the Comparator Group to similarly situated executives. The award value was estimated using the same methodology used for
financial accounting.
For each officer, the committee set a number of NQ Equivalents to achieve the desired grant value. The committee decided to
allocate the NQ Equivalents for each officer equally between restricted stock units and options to give equal emphasis to promoting
retention, motivating the executive and aligning his interests with those of shareholders.
Before approving the grants, the committee reviewed the amount of unvested equity compensation held by the officers to assess its
retention value. In making this assessment, the committee used its judgment and did not apply any formula, threshold or maximum. This
review did not result in an increase or decrease of the awards from the levels described above.
The exercise price of the options was the closing price of TI stock on January 25, 2013, the third trading day after the company
released its annual and fourth quarter financial results for 2012. All grants were made under the Texas Instruments 2009 Long-Term
Incentive Plan, which shareholders approved in April 2009.
All grants have the terms described on pages 85-86. The differences in the equity awards between the named executive officers
were primarily the result of differences in the applicable estimated market level of equity compensation for their positions, and not the
application of any formula designed to maintain differentials between the officers.
Bonus – In January 2014, the committee set the 2013 bonus compensation for executive officers based on its assessment of 2013
performance. In setting the bonuses, the committee used the following performance measures to assess the company:
• The relative one-year and three-year performance of TI as compared with competitor companies, as measured by
○ revenue growth,
○ operating profit as a percentage of revenue,
○
total shareholder return; and
• The absolute one-year and three-year performance of TI on the above measures.
In addition, the committee considered our strategic progress by reviewing how competitive we are in key markets with our core
products and technologies, as well as the strength of our relationships with key customers.
One-year relative performance on the three measures and one-year strategic progress were the primary considerations in the
committee’s assessment of the company’s 2013 performance. In assessing performance, the committee did not use formulas,
thresholds or multiples. Because market conditions can quickly change in our industry, thresholds established at the beginning of a
year could prove irrelevant by year-end. The committee believes its approach, which assesses the company’s relative performance
in hindsight after year-end, gives it the insight to most effectively and critically judge results and encourages executives to pursue
strategies that serve the long-term interests of the company and its shareholders.
In the comparison of relative performance, the committee used the following companies (the “competitor companies”):2
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Altera Corporation
Analog Devices, Inc.
Atmel Corporation
Broadcom Corporation
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.
Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd.
Infineon Technologies AG
Intel Corporation
Intersil Corporation
Linear Technology Corporation
LSI Corporation
Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
Microchip Technology Incorporated
NVIDIA Corporation
NXP Semiconductors N.V.
ON Semiconductor Corporation
QUALCOMM Incorporated
STMicroelectronics N.V.
Xilinx, Inc.
This list includes both broad-based and niche suppliers that operate in our key markets or offer technology that competes with our
products. The committee considers annually whether the list is still appropriate in terms of revenue, market capitalization and changes
in business activities of the companies. The committee made no change to the list of competitor companies in 2013.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
2 To the extent the companies had not released financial results for the year or most recent quarter, the committee based its
evaluation on estimates and projections of the companies’ financial results for 2013.
74 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Assessment of 2013 performance
The committee spent extensive time in December and January assessing TI’s results and strategic progress for 2013. The committee
considered both quantitative and qualitative data, and it applied judgment in its assessment. Overall, the committee determined that TI’s
performance was better than the prior year. Absolute performance in the company’s core businesses was stronger versus a year ago,
and relative performance for total TI was, again, better on most measures (see list of competitor companies above). The committee also
noted the increasing strength of TI’s strategic position. Commensurate with this performance, the committee set bonuses for executive
officers about 10 percent higher than the prior year. Below are details of the committee’s performance assessment.
Revenue and margin
• TI revenue declined 4.8 percent, which was below the median growth rate of competitor companies. However, this included a
$730 million decline in revenue from legacy wireless products, for which the company has had publicly stated exit plans for
a number of years. Excluding the legacy wireless products, TI’s revenue grew about 1 percent, better than the median rate
of competitors.3 Revenue for the company’s core businesses of Analog and Embedded Processing was up 2.8 percent and
8.6 percent, respectively. This resulted in share gains for both businesses.
• Operating profit margin was 23.2 percent, above the median comparison with competitors.
• Three-year metrics were -4.4 percent compounded annual revenue growth and 20.1 percent average operating profit margin,
below and above the median, respectively, as compared with competitors. (Without the impact of the legacy wireless products
mentioned above, three-year compounded revenue growth was 1.9 percent, above the median comparison with competitors.)
Total shareholder return (TSR)
• TSR was 46.3 percent, which was better than the median performance of competitors.
• The company again generated strong cash, with free cash flow at 24.4 percent of revenue.4 More than 100 percent of free
cash flow was returned to shareholders in 2013 through share repurchases and dividends. Share repurchases of $2.9 billion
reduced outstanding shares by 2.3 percent (net of stock issuances during the year). The quarterly dividend rate increased twice,
by 33.3 percent and 7.1 percent, respectively (the 11th and 12th increases in ten years). These share repurchases and dividend
increases are an important element of TI’s capital management strategy. TI’s business model, with its focus on Analog and
Embedded Processing semiconductors, allows the company to consistently generate cash and return it to shareholders, which
puts TI within a unique group of companies that do so.
• The balance sheet remained robust, ending the year with cash and short-term investments of $3.8 billion.
• Three-year TSR increased 13.2 percent, above the median performance of competitors.
Strategic progress
• The company’s efforts over the past five years to focus on Analog and Embedded Processing semiconductors have yielded
strong results. Almost 80 percent of revenue in 2013 came from these core businesses, which serve markets with thousands of
possible applications and have dependable long-term growth opportunities. The company’s customer base is highly diverse, with
no single customer representing more than 7 percent of total revenue.
• The successful integration of National Semiconductor continued, with the associated product lines gaining market share in 2013,
a year ahead of schedule.
• Also of note were the company’s strategic access to low-cost capacity for future revenue growth, and its strong customer and
•
market share position in China.
In all, the committee concluded that the strategic condition of the company continued to improve and provides a sustainable
competitive advantage.
3 Revenue excluding legacy wireless products (baseband products, and OMAP™ applications processors and connectivity products
sold into smartphone and consumer tablet applications) is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation to GAAP, see the
Appendix to this proxy statement.
4 Free cash flow was calculated by subtracting Capital expenditures from the GAAP-based Cash flows from operating activities.
Free cash flow and the ratios based on it are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation to GAAP, see the Appendix to this
proxy statement.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 75
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT Performance Summary
Revenue growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Free cash flow as % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of free cash flow returned to shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in quarterly dividend rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total shareholder return (TSR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-Year
-4.8%
23.2%
24.4%
136.0%
42.9%
46.3%
3-Year
-4.4% CAGR
20.1% average
21.5% average
111.4% average
130.8%
13.2% CAGR
CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is calculated using the formula (Ending Value/Beginning Value)1/number of years-1.
One-year TSR % = (adjusted closing price of the company’s stock at year-end 2013, divided by 2012 year-end adjusted closing price)
minus 1. The adjusted closing price is as shown under Historical Prices for the company’s stock on Yahoo Finance
and reflects stock splits and reinvestment of dividends.
Three-year TSR CAGR % = (adjusted closing price of the company’s stock at year-end 2013, divided by 2010 year-end adjusted closing
price)1/3 minus 1. Adjusted closing price is as described above.
Before setting the bonuses for the named executive officers, the committee considered the officers’ individual performance. The
performance of the CEO was judged according to the performance of the company. For the other officers, the committee considered the
factors described below in assessing individual performance. In making this assessment, the committee did not apply any formula or
performance targets.
Mr. March is the chief financial officer. The committee noted the financial management of the company.
Mr. Crutcher is responsible for the company’s analog semiconductor product lines. The committee noted the financial performance
and strategic position of the product lines.
Mr. Ritchie is responsible for the company’s semiconductor manufacturing operations. The committee noted the performance of
those operations, including their cost-competitiveness and inventory management.
Mr. Delagi is responsible for the company’s embedded processing and custom product lines. The committee noted the financial
performance and strategic position of these product lines.
The bonuses awarded for 2013 performance are shown in the table on page 77. The differences in the amounts awarded to the
named executive officers were primarily the result of differences in the officers’ level of responsibility and the applicable market level of
total cash compensation expected to be paid to similarly situated officers in the Comparator Group. The bonus of each named executive
officer was paid under the Executive Officer Performance Plan described on pages 80 and 83.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
76 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Results of the compensation decisions – Results of the compensation decisions made by the committee relating to the named executive
officers for 2013 are summarized in the following table. This table is provided as a supplement to the summary compensation table on
page 81 for investors who may find it useful to see the data presented in this form. Although the committee does not target a specific
level of total compensation, it considers information similar to that in the table to ensure that the sum of these elements is, in its
judgment, in a reasonable range. The principal differences between this table and the summary compensation table are explained in
footnote 5 below.5
Officer
R. K. Templeton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. P. March . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. T. Crutcher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. J. Ritchie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year
Salary
(Annual Rate)
2013 $ 1,075,000
2012 $ 1,040,000
2011 $ 990,087
Profit Sharing
Bonus
$ 92,199
$ 48,581
$ 78,118
$ 3,000,000
$ 2,700,000
$ 2,700,000
2013 $ 610,000
2012 $ 590,000
2011 $ 565,008
$ 52,317
$ 27,573
$ 44,349
$ 965,000
$ 875,000
$ 875,000
2013 $ 675,000
2012 $ 630,000*
2011 $ 485,004
$ 57,728
$ 27,573
$ 37,873
$ 1,210,000
$ 1,100,000
$ 925,000
2013 $ 625,000
2012 $ 600,000
2011 $ 550,020
$ 53,571
$ 27,945
$ 42,873
$ 1,100,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
Equity Compensation
(Grant Date
Fair Value)
$ 9,299,374
$ 9,074,035
$ 9,883,575
$ 2,656,964
$ 2,865,478
$ 3,020,004
$ 3,985,446
$ 6,341,848
$ 3,569,080
$ 3,542,630
$ 3,343,079
$ 3,569,080
Total
$13,466,573
$12,862,616
$13,651,780
$ 4,284,281
$ 4,358,051
$ 4,504,361
$ 5,928,174
$ 8,099,421
$ 5,016,957
$ 5,321,201
$ 4,971,024
$ 5,161,973
R. G. Delagi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 $ 625,000
2012 $ 600,000*
$ 53,571
$ 26,645
$ 865,000
$ 825,000
$ 3,542,630
$ 4,723,079
$ 5,086,201
$ 6,174,724
* Annual rate effective June 2012.
For Messrs. Templeton and Ritchie, the “Total” was higher for 2013 than for 2012 primarily due to the combination of higher bonus
levels and the higher grant date fair value of their equity compensation. For Mr. March, the “Total” was essentially unchanged for
2013 as compared to 2012. For the other officers, the ”Total” was lower for 2013 due to the lower grant date fair value of their
equity compensation.
5 This table shows the annual rate of base salary as set by the committee. In the summary compensation table, the “Salary”
column shows the actual salary paid in the year. This table has separate columns for profit sharing and bonus. In the summary
compensation table, profit sharing and bonus are aggregated in the column for “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation,” in
accordance with SEC requirements. Please see notes 2 and 3 to the summary compensation table for information about how grant
date fair value was calculated.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 77
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT The compensation decisions shown above resulted in the following 2013 compensation mix for the named executive officers:
CEO
8%
Other NEOs*
20%
12%
1%
22%
1%
69%
67%
Base Salary
Equity Compensation
Profit Sharing
Bonus
* Average data for the named executive officers other than Mr. Templeton.
Equity dilution
The Compensation Committee’s goal is to keep net annual dilution from equity compensation under 2 percent. “Net annual dilution”
means the number of shares under equity awards granted by the committee each year to all employees (net of award forfeitures)
as a percentage of the shares of the company’s outstanding common stock. Equity awards granted in 2013 under the company’s
equity-compensation program resulted in 1.3 percent net annual dilution.
Process for equity grants
The Compensation Committee makes grant decisions for equity compensation at its January meeting each year. The dates on which
these meetings occur are generally set three years in advance. The January meetings of the board and the committee generally occur in
the week or two before we announce our financial results for the previous quarter and year.
On occasion, the committee may grant stock options or restricted stock units to executives at times other than January. For
example, it has done so in connection with job promotions and for purposes of retention.
We do not back-date stock options or restricted stock units. We do not accelerate or delay the release of information due to plans for
making equity grants.
If the committee meeting falls in the same month as the release of the company’s financial results, the committee’s practice is to
make grants effective (i) after the results have been released or (ii) on the meeting day if later. In other months, its practice is to make
them effective on the day of committee action. The exercise price of stock options is the closing price of TI stock on the effective date of
the grant.
Recoupment policy
The committee has a policy concerning recoupment (“clawback”) of executive bonuses and equity compensation. Under the policy, in
the event of a material restatement of TI’s financial results due to misconduct, the committee will review the facts and circumstances
and take the actions it considers appropriate with respect to the compensation of any executive officer whose fraud or willful
misconduct contributed to the need for such restatement. Such action may include (a) seeking reimbursement of any bonus paid to
such officer exceeding the amount that, in the judgment of the committee, would have been paid had the financial results been properly
reported and (b) seeking to recover profits received by such officer during the twelve months after the restated period under equity
compensation awards. All determinations by the committee with respect to this policy are final and binding on all interested parties.
Most recent stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation
In April 2013, our shareholders cast an advisory vote on the company’s executive compensation decisions and policies as disclosed
in the proxy statement issued by the company in March 2013. Approximately 95 percent of the shares voted on the matter were cast
in support of the compensation decisions and policies as disclosed. The committee considered this result and determined that it was
not necessary at this time to make any material changes to the company’s compensation policies and practices in response to the
advisory vote.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
78 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Benefits
Retirement plans
The executive officers participate in our retirement plans under the same rules that apply to other U.S. employees. We maintain these
plans to have a competitive benefits program and for retention.
Like other established U.S. manufacturers, we have had a U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan for many years. At its origin,
the plan was designed to be consistent with those offered by other employers in the diverse markets in which we operated, which at
the time included consumer and defense electronics as well as semiconductors and materials products. In order to limit the cost of the
plan, we closed the plan to new participants in 1997. We gave U.S. employees as of November 1997 the choice to remain in the plan,
or to have their plan benefits frozen (i.e., no benefit increase attributable to years of service or change in eligible earnings) and begin
participating in an enhanced defined contribution plan. Mr. Templeton and Mr. Crutcher chose not to remain in the defined benefit plan.
As a result, their benefits under that plan were frozen in 1997 and they participate in the enhanced defined contribution plan. The other
named executive officers have continued their participation in the defined benefit pension plan.
The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) imposes certain limits on the retirement benefits that may be provided under a qualified plan. To
maintain the desired level of benefits, we have non-qualified defined benefit pension plans for participants in the qualified pension plan.
Under the non-qualified plans, participants receive benefits that would ordinarily be paid under the qualified pension plan but for the
limitations under the IRC. For additional information about the defined benefit plans, please see pages 86-90.
Employees accruing benefits in the qualified pension plan, including the named executive officers other than Mr. Templeton and
Mr. Crutcher, also are eligible to participate in a qualified defined contribution plan that provides employer matching contributions. The
enhanced defined contribution plan, in which Mr. Templeton and Mr. Crutcher participate, provides for a fixed employer contribution plus
an employer matching contribution.
In general, if an employee who participates in the pension plan (including an employee whose benefits are frozen as described
above) dies after having met the requirements for normal or early retirement, his or her beneficiary will receive a benefit equal to the
lump-sum amount that the participant would have received if he or she had retired before death. In 2013, having reached the age
of 55 with at least 20 years of employment, Mr. Templeton, Mr. March and Mr. Ritchie were eligible for early retirement under the
pension plans.
Because benefits under the qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans are calculated on the basis of eligible earnings
(salary and bonus), an increase in salary or bonus may result in an increase in benefits under the plans. Salary or bonus increases for
Mr. Templeton and Mr. Crutcher do not result in greater benefits for them under the company’s defined benefit pension plans because
their benefits under those plans were frozen in 1997. The committee considers the potential effect on the executives’ retirement
benefits when it sets salary and performance bonus levels.
Deferred compensation
Any U.S. employee whose base salary and management responsibility exceed a certain level may defer the receipt of a portion of
his or her salary, bonus and profit sharing. Rules of the U.S. Department of Labor require that this plan be limited to a select group of
management or highly compensated employees. The plan allows employees to defer the receipt of their compensation in a tax-efficient
manner. Eligible employees include, but are not limited to, the executive officers. We have the plan to be competitive with the benefits
packages offered by other companies.
The executive officers’ deferred compensation account balances are unsecured and all amounts remain part of the company’s
operating assets. The value of the deferred amounts tracks the performance of investment alternatives selected by the participant.
These alternatives are a subset of those offered to participants in the defined contribution plans described above. The company does
not guarantee any minimum return on the amounts deferred. In accordance with SEC rules, no earnings on deferred compensation are
shown in the summary compensation table on page 81 for 2013 because no “above market” rates were earned on deferred amounts in
that year.
Employee stock purchase plan
Our shareholders approved the TI Employees 2005 Stock Purchase Plan in April 2005. Under the plan, all employees in the U.S. and
certain other countries may purchase a limited number of shares of the company’s common stock at a 15 percent discount. The plan is
designed to offer the broad-based employee population an opportunity to acquire an equity interest in the company and thereby align
their interests with those of shareholders. Consistent with our general approach to benefit programs, executive officers are also eligible
to participate.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 79
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT Health-related benefits
Executive officers are eligible under the same plans as all other U.S. employees for medical, dental, vision, disability and life insurance.
These benefits are intended to be competitive with benefits offered in the semiconductor industry.
Other benefits
Executive officers receive only a few benefits that are not available to all other U.S. employees. The CEO is eligible for a company-paid
physical and financial counseling. In addition, the board of directors has determined that for security reasons, it is in the company’s
interest to require the CEO to use company aircraft for personal air travel. Please see pages 82 (footnote 6) and 90 for further details.
The company provides no tax gross-ups for perquisites to any of the executive officers.
Compensation following employment termination or change in control
None of the executive officers has an employment contract. Executive officers are eligible for benefits on the same terms as other
U.S. employees upon termination of employment or a change in control of the company. The current programs are described under
the heading Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control beginning on page 90. None of the few additional benefits that
the executive officers receive continue after termination of employment, except the amount for financial counseling is provided in the
following year in the event of retirement. The committee reviews the potential impact of these programs before finalizing the annual
compensation for the named executive officers. The committee did not raise or lower compensation for 2013 based on this review.
The Texas Instruments 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan generally establishes double-trigger change-in-control terms for grants made
in 2010 and later years. Under those terms, options become fully exercisable and shares are issued under restricted stock unit awards
(to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the IRC) if the grantee is involuntarily terminated within 24 months after a change in control
of TI. These terms are intended to encourage employees to remain with the company through a transaction while reducing employee
uncertainty and distraction in the period leading up to any such event.
Stock ownership guidelines and policy against hedging
Our board of directors has established stock ownership guidelines for executive officers. The guideline for the CEO is four times base
salary or 125,000 shares, whichever is less. The guideline for other executive officers is three times base salary or 25,000 shares,
whichever is less. Executive officers have five years from their election as executive officers to reach these targets. Directly owned
shares and restricted stock units count toward satisfying the guidelines.
Short sales of TI stock by our executive officers are prohibited. It is against TI policy for any employee, including an executive officer,
to engage in trading in “puts” (options to sell at a fixed price on or before a certain date), “calls” (similar options to buy), or other options
or hedging techniques on TI stock.
Consideration of tax and accounting treatment of compensation
Section 162(m) of the IRC generally denies a deduction to any publicly held corporation for compensation paid in a taxable year to the
company’s CEO and three other highest compensated officers excluding the CFO, to the extent that the officer’s compensation (other
than qualified performance-based compensation) exceeds $1 million. The Compensation Committee considers the impact of this
deductibility limit on the compensation that it intends to award. The committee exercises its discretion to award compensation that
does not meet the requirements of Section 162(m) when applying the limits of Section 162(m) would frustrate or be inconsistent with
our compensation policies and/or when the value of the foregone deduction would not be material. The committee has exercised this
discretion when awarding restricted stock units that vest over time, without performance conditions to vesting. The committee believes
it is in the best interest of the company and our shareholders that restricted stock unit awards provide for the retention of our executive
officers in all market conditions.
The Texas Instruments Executive Officer Performance Plan is intended to ensure that performance bonuses under the plan are fully
tax deductible under Section 162(m). The plan, which shareholders approved in 2002, is further described on page 83. The committee’s
general policy is to award bonuses within the plan, although the committee reserves the discretion to pay a bonus outside the plan if it
determines that it is in the best interest of the company and our shareholders to do so. The committee set the bonuses of the named
executive officers for 2013 performance at the levels described on page 77. The bonuses were awarded within the plan.
When setting equity compensation, the committee considers the estimated cost for financial reporting purposes of equity
compensation it intends to grant. Its consideration of the estimated cost of grants made in 2013 is discussed on pages 73-74.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
80 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Compensation Committee report
The Compensation Committee of the board of directors has furnished the following report:
The committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) with the company’s management.
Based on that review and discussion, the committee has recommended to the board of directors that the CD&A be included in the
company’s annual report on Form 10-K for 2013 and the company’s proxy statement for the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders.
Carrie S. Cox, Chair
Pamela H. Patsley
Robert E. Sanchez
2013 summary compensation table
The table below shows the compensation of the company’s CEO, CFO and each of the other three most highly compensated individuals
who were executive officers during 2013 (collectively called the “named executive officers”) for services in all capacities to the company
in 2013. For a discussion of the amount of a named executive officer’s salary and bonus in proportion to his total compensation, please
see the CD&A on pages 69-78.
Name and Principal
Position
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)(1)
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
Option
Awards
($)(3)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
Change in
Pension Value
and
Non-qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)(5)
All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
Total ($)
Richard K. Templeton . . . . 2013 $1,072,083 — $ 5,740,000 $ 3,559,374 $ 3,092,199
Chairman, President
2012 $1,035,841 — $ 5,123,688 $ 3,950,347 $ 2,748,581 $ 185,472
& Chief Executive Officer 2011 $ 990,087 — $ 5,194,500 $ 4,689,075 $ 2,778,118 $ 149,704
— $ 249,203 $13,712,859
$ 272,710 $13,316,639
$ 254,283 $14,055,767
Kevin P. March . . . . . . . 2013 $ 608,333 — $ 1,640,000 $ 1,016,964 $ 1,017,317
Senior Vice President
& Chief Financial Officer
2012 $ 587,917 — $ 1,618,000 $ 1,247,478 $ 902,573 $1,065,717
2011 $ 562,091 — $ 1,587,231 $ 1,432,773 $ 919,349 $ 896,326
— $ 8,243 $ 4,290,857
$ 20,244 $ 5,441,929
$ 39,925 $ 5,437,695
Brian T. Crutcher . . . . . . 2013 $ 671,250 — $ 2,460,000 $ 1,525,446 $ 1,267,728
Senior Vice President
2012 $ 587,917 — $ 4,782,500 $ 1,559,348 $ 1,127,573 $
2011 $ 480,007 — $ 1,875,803 $ 1,693,277 $ 962,873 $
— $ 106,655 $ 6,031,079
$ 95,375 $ 8,153,718
$ 49,540 $ 5,062,196
1,005
696
Kevin J. Ritchie . . . . . . . 2013 $ 622,917 — $ 2,186,678 $ 1,355,952 $ 1,153,571
Senior Vice President
2012 $ 595,835 — $ 1,887,688 $ 1,455,391 $ 1,027,945 $1,371,918
2011 $ 543,385 — $ 1,875,803 $ 1,693,277 $ 1,042,873 $1,143,408
— $ 7,427 $ 5,326,545
$ 19,847 $ 6,358,624
$ 13,855 $ 6,312,601
R. Gregory Delagi . . . . . . 2013 $ 622,917 — $ 2,186,678 $ 1,355,952 $ 918,571
Senior Vice President
2012 $ 568,125 — $ 3,267,688 $ 1,455,391 $ 851,645 $ 990,491
— $ 54,158 $ 5,138,276
$ 23,282 $ 7,156,622
(1) Performance bonuses for 2013 were paid under the Texas Instruments Executive Officer Performance Plan. In accordance with SEC
requirements, these amounts are reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column.
(2) Shown is the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock unit (RSU) awards calculated in accordance with ASC 718. The
discussion of the assumptions used for purposes of the valuation of the awards granted in 2013 appears in Note 5 of Exhibit 13 to
TI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. For a description of the grant terms, please see page 86.
The discussion of the assumptions used for purposes of the valuation of the awards granted in 2012 and 2011 appears in Exhibit 13
to, respectively, TI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (pages 14-16) and to TI’s annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (pages 14-16).
(3) Shown is the aggregate grant date fair value of options calculated in accordance with ASC 718. The discussion of the assumptions
used for purposes of the valuation of options granted in 2013 appears in Note 5 of Exhibit 13 to TI’s annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2013. For a description of the grant terms, please see page 85. The discussion of the assumptions
used for purposes of the valuation of the awards granted in 2012 and 2011 appears in Exhibit 13 to, respectively, TI’s annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (pages 14-16) and to TI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2011 (pages 14-16).
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 81
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT
(4) Consists of performance bonus and profit sharing for 2013. Please see page 77 for the amounts of bonus and profit sharing paid to
each of the named executive officers for 2013.
(5) The company does not pay above-market earnings on deferred compensation. Therefore, no amounts are reported in this column
for deferred compensation. The amounts in this column represent the change in the actuarial value of the named executive officers’
benefits under the qualified defined benefit pension plan (TI Employees Pension Plan) and the non-qualified defined benefit pension
plans (TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan and TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan II) from December 31, 2012, through
December 31, 2013. This “change in the actuarial value” is the difference between the 2012 and 2013 present value of the pension
benefit accumulated as of year-end by the named executive officer, assuming that benefit is not paid until age 65. Mr. Templeton’s
and Mr. Crutcher’s benefits under the company’s pension plans were frozen as of December 31, 1997. The actuarial value of the
named executive officers’ benefits decreased by the following amounts: Mr. Templeton, $112,912; Mr. March, $41,748; Mr. Crutcher,
$825; Mr. Ritchie, $36,892; and Mr. Delagi, $217,125. In accordance with SEC rules, these amounts have not been included in their
total 2013 compensation shown in this table.
(6) Consists of (i) the amounts in the table below and (ii) perquisites and personal benefits that meet the disclosure thresholds
established by the SEC and are detailed in the paragraph below.
Name
Insurance
401(k)
Contribution
R. K. Templeton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. P. March . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. T. Crutcher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. J. Ritchie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. G. Delagi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$250
$250
$250
$250
$250
$10,200
$ 5,100
$10,200
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
Defined
Contribution
Retirement
Plan (a)
$126,875
N/A
$ 85,986
N/A
N/A
Unused
Vacation
Time (b)
$12,600
$ 2,893
—
$ 2,077
$48,808
(a) Consists of (i) contributions under the company’s enhanced defined contribution retirement plan of $5,100 and (ii) an additional
amount of $121,775 for Mr. Templeton and $80,886 for Mr. Crutcher accrued by TI to offset IRC limitations on amounts that could
be contributed to the enhanced defined contribution retirement plan, which amount is also shown in the Non-qualified Deferred
Compensation table on page 89.
(b) Represents payments for unused vacation time that could not be carried forward.
The perquisites and personal benefits are as follows: $99,278 for Mr. Templeton, consisting of personal use of company aircraft
($88,261), financial counseling and an executive physical; and $10,219 for Mr. Crutcher, consisting of financial counseling and an
executive physical. Financial counseling and an executive physical were made available to the other named executive officers, but
the amounts attributable to those officers were below the disclosure thresholds. The amount shown for personal use of aircraft is the
incremental cost, which we valued using a method that takes into account: landing, parking and flight planning services expenses;
crew travel expenses; supplies and catering expenses; aircraft fuel and oil expenses per hour of flight; communications costs; a portion
of ongoing maintenance; and any customs, foreign permit and similar fees. Because company aircraft are primarily used for business
travel, this methodology excludes the fixed costs, which do not change based on usage, such as pilots’ salaries and the lease or
purchase cost of the company-owned aircraft.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
82 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Grants of plan-based awards in 2013
The following table shows the grants of plan-based awards to the named executive officers in 2013.
Name
Grant
Date
Date of
Committee
Action
R. K. Templeton . . . 1/25/13 (1) 1/17/13
1/25/13 (1) 1/17/13
K. P. March . . . . . 1/25/13 (1) 1/17/13
1/25/13 (1) 1/17/13
B. T. Crutcher . . . . 1/25/13 (1) 1/17/13
1/25/13 (1) 1/17/13
1/25/13 (1) 1/17/13
1/25/13 (1) 1/17/13
R. G. Delagi . . . . . 1/25/13 (1) 1/17/13
1/25/13 (1) 1/17/13
K. J. Ritchie . . . .
Estimated Possible Payouts
under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
($)
Estimated Future Payouts
under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Threshold
(#)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)(2)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)(3)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
(4)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards (5)
175,000
50,000
75,000
66,667
66,667
525,000 $32.80 $3,559,374
$5,740,000
150,000 $32.80 $1,016,964
$1,640,000
225,000 $32.80 $1,525,446
$2,460,000
200,000 $32.80 $1,355,952
$2,186,678
200,000 $32.80 $1,355,952
$2,186,678
* TI did not use formulas or pre-set thresholds or multiples to determine incentive awards. Under the terms of the Executive
Officer Performance Plan, each named executive officer is eligible to receive a cash bonus equal to 0.5 percent of the company’s
consolidated income (as defined in the plan). However, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to set bonuses at a lower
level if it decides it is appropriate to do so. The committee decided to do so for 2013.
(1) In accordance with the grant policy of the Compensation Committee of the board (described on page 78), the grants became
effective on the third trading day after the company released its financial results for the fourth quarter and year 2012. The company
released these results on January 22, 2013.
(2) The stock awards granted to the named executive officers in 2013 were RSU awards. These awards were made under the
company’s 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan. For information on the terms and conditions of these RSU awards, please see the
discussion on page 86.
(3) The options were granted under the company’s 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan. For information on the terms and conditions of
these options, please see the discussion on page 85.
(4) The exercise price of the options is the closing price of TI common stock on January 25, 2013.
(5) Shown is the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC 718 for stock and option awards in 2013. The
discussion of the assumptions used for purposes of the valuation appears in Note 5 of Exhibit 13 to TI’s annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2013.
None of the options or other equity awards granted to the named executive officers was repriced or modified by the company.
For additional information regarding TI’s equity compensation grant practices, please see pages 71, 73-74, 78, 80 and 85-86.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 83
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT
Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2013
The following table shows the outstanding equity awards for each of the named executive officers as of December 31, 2013.
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested (#)
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
($)(1)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested ($)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$32.80 1/25/2023 175,000 (6)
$32.36 1/26/2022 158,334 (7)
$34.63 1/27/2021 150,000 (8)
$23.05 1/28/2020 180,000 (9)
$14.95 1/29/2019
$29.79 1/25/2018
$28.32 1/18/2017
$32.55 1/19/2016
$21.55 1/20/2015
—
—
—
—
—
$7,684,250 —
$6,952,446 —
$6,586,500 —
$7,903,800 —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
$32.80 1/25/2023
$32.36 1/26/2022
$34.63 1/27/2021
$23.05 1/28/2020
$14.95 1/29/2019
$29.79 1/25/2018
$32.55 1/19/2016
50,000 (6)
50,000 (7)
45,834 (8)
53,751 (9)
—
—
—
$2,195,500 —
$2,195,500 —
$2,012,571 —
$2,360,206 —
— —
— —
— —
$32.80 1/25/2023
$32.36 1/26/2022
$34.63 1/27/2021
$23.05 1/28/2020
$3,293,250 —
75,000 (6)
$2,744,375 —
62,500 (7)
$2,378,473 —
54,167 (8)
50,000 (9)
$2,195,500 —
100,000 (10) $4,391,000 —
100,000 (11) $4,391,000 —
$32.80 1/25/2023
$32.36 1/26/2022
$34.63 1/27/2021
$23.05 1/28/2020
$29.79 1/25/2018
$28.32 1/18/2017
$32.55 1/19/2016
66,667 (6)
58,334 (7)
54,167 (8)
62,501 (9)
—
—
—
$2,927,348 —
$2,561,446 —
$2,378,473 —
$2,744,419 —
— —
— —
— —
$32.80 1/25/2023
$32.36 1/26/2022
$34.63 1/27/2021
$23.05 1/28/2020
$14.95 1/29/2019
$29.79 1/25/2018
66,667 (6)
$2,927,348 —
58,334 (7)
$2,561,446 —
54,167 (8)
$2,378,473 —
$2,689,531 —
61,251 (9)
50,000 (10) $2,195,500 —
— —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
— 525,000 (2)
356,250 (3)
225,000 (4)
135,000 (5)
—
—
—
—
—
118,750
225,000
405,000
664,461
270,000
270,000
350,000
500,000
— 150,000 (2)
112,500 (3)
68,750 (4)
40,313 (5)
—
—
—
37,500
68,750
120,937
95,000
85,000
85,000
— 225,000 (2)
46,875 140,625 (3)
81,250 (4)
31,250
37,500 (5)
12,500
43,750
81,250
— 200,000 (2)
131,250 (3)
81,250 (4)
— 46,875 (5)
100,000
100,000
100,000
—
—
—
— 200,000 (2)
131,250 (3)
81,250 (4)
45,938 (5)
—
—
43,750
81,250
137,812
135,000
20,000
Name
R. K. Templeton . . . .
K. P. March . . . . . .
B. T. Crutcher . . . . .
K. J. Ritchie . . . . .
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
R. G. Delagi . . . . . .
(1) Calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs by the closing price of TI common stock on December 31, 2013 ($43.91).
(2) One-quarter of the shares became exercisable on January 25, 2014, and one-third of the remaining shares become exercisable on
each of January 25, 2015, January 25, 2016, and January 25, 2017.
84 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
(3) One-third of the shares became exercisable on January 26, 2014, and one-half of the remaining shares become exercisable on
each of January 26, 2015, and January 26, 2016.
(4) One-half of the shares became exercisable on January 27, 2014, and the remaining one-half become exercisable on
January 27, 2015.
(5) Became fully exercisable on January 28, 2014.
(6) Vesting date is January 31, 2017.
(7) Vesting date is January 29, 2016.
(8) Vesting date is January 30, 2015.
(9) Vested on January 31, 2014.
(10) Vesting date is July 29, 2016.
(11) Vesting date is October 31, 2014.
The “Option Awards” shown in the table above are non-qualified stock options, each of which represents the right to purchase shares
of TI common stock at the stated exercise price. For grants before 2007, the exercise price is the average of the high and low price
of TI common stock on the grant date. For grants after 2006, the exercise price is the closing price of TI common stock on the grant
date. The term of each option is ten years unless the option is terminated earlier pursuant to provisions summarized in the chart below
and in the paragraph following the chart. Options vest (become exercisable) in increments of 25 percent per year beginning on the
first anniversary of the date of the grant. The chart below shows the termination provisions relating to stock options outstanding as
of December 31, 2013. The Compensation Committee of the board of directors established these termination provisions to promote
employee retention while offering competitive terms. As noted below, certain terms have been changed for grants made after 2012.
Those changes apply to all U.S. and most non-U.S. grants made in that time period. The committee adopted the changes in January
2013 to align with current market practices and simplify the terms.
Employment
Termination Due to
Death or Permanent
Disability
Employment
Termination (at Least
6 Months after Grant)
When Retirement
Eligible*
Employment Termination
(at Least 6 Months after Grant)
with 20 Years of Credited
Service, but Not Retirement
Eligible**
Vesting continues;
option remains in
effect to end of term
Vesting continues;
option remains in
effect to end of term
Option remains in effect to the end of
the term; vesting does not continue after
employment termination
Employment
Termination for
Cause
Option cancels
Other
Circumstances
of Employment
Termination
Option remains
exercisable for
30 days
* Defined for purposes of equity awards made after 2012 as at least age 55 with 10 or more years of TI service or at least age 65. For
awards made before 2013, the definition of normal or early retirement eligibility in the relevant pension plan applies (see page 87).
** This provision is not applicable to grants made after 2012.
Options may be cancelled if the grantee competes with TI during the two years after employment termination or discloses TI trade
secrets. In addition, for options received while the grantee was an executive officer, the company may reclaim (or “claw back”) profits
earned under grants if the officer engages in such conduct. These provisions are intended to strengthen retention and provide a
reasonable remedy to TI in case of competition or disclosure of our confidential information.
Options granted after 2009 become fully vested if the grantee is involuntarily terminated from employment with TI (other than for
cause) within 24 months after a change in control of TI. “Change in control” is defined as provided in the Texas Instruments 2009 Long-
Term Incentive Plan and occurs upon (1) acquisition of more than 50 percent of the voting stock or at least 80 percent of the assets of
TI or (2) change of a majority of the board of directors in a 12-month period unless a majority of the directors then in office endorsed
the appointment or election of the new directors (“Plan definition”). These terms are intended to reduce employee uncertainty and
distraction in the period leading up to a change in control, if such an event were to occur. For options granted before 2010, the stock
option terms provide that upon a change in control of TI, the option becomes fully vested to the extent it is then outstanding; and if
employment termination (except for cause) has occurred within 30 days before the change in control, the change in control is deemed to
have occurred first. “Change in control” is defined in these pre-2010 options as (1) acquisition of 20 percent of TI common stock other
than through a transaction approved by the board of directors, or (2) change of a majority of the board of directors in a 24-month period
unless a majority of the directors then in office have elected or nominated the new directors (together, the “pre-2010 definition”).
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 85
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT The “Stock Awards” in the table of outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2013 are RSU awards. Each RSU represents the right
to receive one share of TI common stock on a stated date (the “vesting date”) unless the award is terminated earlier under terms
summarized below. In general, the vesting date is approximately four years after the grant date. Each RSU includes the right to receive
dividend equivalents, which are paid annually in cash at a rate equal to the amount paid to stockholders in dividends. The table below
shows the termination provisions of RSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2013.
Employment Termination
Due to Death or Permanent Disability
Employment Termination
(at Least 6 Months after Grant)
When Retirement Eligible
Employment
Termination for
Cause
Other Circumstances
of Employment
Termination
Vesting continues; shares are paid
at the scheduled vesting date
For grants made after 2012: Grant stays in effect and
pays out shares at the scheduled vesting date.
Grant cancels; no
shares are issued
Grant cancels; no
shares are issued
For grants made before 2013: Grant stays in effect
and pays out shares at the scheduled vesting date.
Number of shares reduced according to the duration of
employment over the vesting period*
* Calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs by a fraction equal to the number of whole 365-day periods from the grant date to the
employment termination date (or first day of any bridge leave of absence leading to retirement), divided by the number of years in
the vesting period.
These termination provisions are intended to promote retention. All RSU awards contain cancellation and clawback provisions like those
described above for stock options. The terms provide that, to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the IRC, the award vests upon
involuntary termination of TI employment within 24 months after a change in control. Change in control is the Plan definition. These
cancellation, clawback and change-in-control terms are intended to conform RSU terms with those of stock options (to the extent
permitted by the IRC) and to achieve the objectives described above in the discussion of stock options.
In addition to the “Stock Awards” shown in the outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2013 table on pages 84 and 85,
Mr. Templeton holds an award of RSUs that was granted in 1995. The award, for 120,000 shares of TI common stock, vested in 2000.
Under the award terms, the shares will be issued to Mr. Templeton in March of the year after his termination of employment for any
reason. These terms were designed to provide a tax benefit to the company by postponing the related compensation expense until
it was likely to be fully deductible. In accordance with SEC requirements, this award is reflected in the 2013 non-qualified deferred
compensation table on page 89.
2013 option exercises and stock vested
The following table lists the number of shares acquired and the value realized as a result of option exercises by the named executive
officers in 2013 and the value of any RSUs that vested in 2013. For option exercises, the value realized is calculated by multiplying the
number of shares acquired by the difference between the exercise price and the market price of TI common stock on the exercise date.
For RSUs, the value realized is calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs that vested by the market price of TI common stock on the
vesting date.
Name
R. K. Templeton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. P. March . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. T. Crutcher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. J. Ritchie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. G. Delagi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
2013 pension benefits
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise (#)
700,000
380,000
243,000
640,625
––
Value Realized
on Exercise ($)
$4,340,000
$5,167,600
$2,485,710
$8,561,250
––
Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting (#)
221,487
63,334
33,334
83,334
73,334
Value Realized
on Vesting ($)
$7,269,203
$2,078,622
$1,094,022
$2,735,022
$2,406,822
The following table shows the present value as of December 31, 2013, of the benefit of the named executive officers under our qualified
defined benefit pension plan (TI Employees Pension Plan) and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans (TI Employees Non-Qualified
Pension Plan (which governs amounts earned before 2005) and TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan II (which governs amounts
earned after 2004)). In accordance with SEC requirements, the amounts shown in the table do not reflect any named executive
officer’s retirement eligibility or any increase in benefits that may result from the named executive officer’s continued employment
after December 31, 2013.
86 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Name
Plan Name
R. K. Templeton (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TI Employees Pension Plan
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan II
K. P. March . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TI Employees Pension Plan
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan II
Number of
Years Credited
Service (#)
16 (2)
16 (2)
16 (4)
28 (2)
19 (3)
28 (4)
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit ($)(5)
$ 540,470
$ 229,223
$ 167,510
$ 702,965
$ 140,998
$3,344,087
B. T. Crutcher (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TI Employees Pension Plan
0.9 (2)
$
3,109
K. J. Ritchie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TI Employees Pension Plan
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan II
R. G. Delagi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TI Employees Pension Plan
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan II
34 (2)
25 (3)
34 (4)
28 (2)
19 (3)
28 (4)
$1,082,813
$ 417,994
$4,350,840
$ 628,390
$ 236,145
$2,320,381
Payments
During
Last
Fiscal
Year ($)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1) In 1997, TI’s U.S. employees were given the choice between continuing to participate in the defined benefit pension plans or
participating in a new enhanced defined contribution retirement plan. Messrs. Templeton and Crutcher chose to participate in the
defined contribution plan. Accordingly, their accrued pension benefits under the qualified and non-qualified plans were frozen
(i.e., they will experience no increase attributable to years of service or change in eligible earnings) as of December 31, 1997.
Contributions to the defined contribution plan for Mr. Templeton’s and Mr. Crutcher’s benefits are included in the 2013 summary
compensation table.
(2) For each of the named executive officers, credited service began on the date the officer became eligible to participate in the plan.
For Mr. Crutcher, eligibility to participate began on the first day of the month following completion of one year of employment. For
each of the other named executive officers, eligibility to participate began on the earlier of 18 months of employment, or January 1
following the completion of one year of employment. Accordingly, each of the named executive officers has been employed by TI for
longer than the years of credited service shown above.
(3) Credited service began on the date the named executive officer became eligible to participate in the TI Employees Pension Plan as
described in note 2 above and ceased at December 31, 2004.
(4) Credited service began on the date the named executive officer became eligible to participate in the TI Employees Pension Plan as
described in note 2 above.
(5) The assumptions and valuation methods used to calculate the present value of the accumulated pension benefits shown are
the same as those used by TI for financial reporting purposes and are described in Note 11 in Exhibit 13 to TI’s annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, except that a named executive officer’s retirement is assumed (in accordance
with SEC rules) for purposes of this table to occur at age 65 and no assumption for termination prior to that date is used. The
amount of the lump-sum benefit earned as of December 31, 2013, is determined using either (i) the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (PBGC) interest assumption of 2.25 percent or (ii) the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) corporate bond yield interest
assumption of 5.11 percent for the TI Employees Pension Plan and 5.18 percent for the TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plans,
whichever rate produces the higher lump sum amount. A discount rate assumption of 5.11 percent for the TI Employees Pension
Plan and 5.18 percent for the non-qualified pension plans was used to determine the present value of each lump sum.
TI Employees Pension Plan
The TI Employees Pension Plan is a qualified defined benefit pension plan. Please see page 79 for a discussion of the origin and purpose
of the plan. Employees who joined the U.S. payroll after November 30, 1997, are not eligible to participate in this plan.
A plan participant is eligible for normal retirement under the terms of the plan if he is at least 65 years of age with one year of
credited service. A participant is eligible for early retirement if he is at least 55 years of age with 20 years of employment or 60 years
of age with five years of employment. As of December 31, 2013, Mr. Templeton, Mr. March and Mr. Ritchie were eligible for early or
normal retirement.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 87
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT
A participant may request payment of his accrued benefit at termination or any time thereafter. Participants may choose a lump sum
payment or one of six forms of annuity. In order of largest to smallest periodic payment, the forms of annuity are: (i) single life annuity,
(ii) 5-year certain and life annuity, (iii) 10-year certain and life annuity, (iv) qualified joint and 50 percent survivor annuity, (v) qualified
joint and 75 percent survivor annuity, and (vi) qualified joint and 100 percent survivor annuity. If the participant does not request
payment, he will begin to receive his benefit in April of the year after he reaches the age of 70½ in the form of annuity required under
the IRC.
The pension formula for the qualified plan is intended to provide a participant with an annual retirement benefit equal to 1.5 percent
multiplied by the product of (i) years of credited service and (ii) the average of the five highest consecutive years of his base salary plus
bonus up to a limit imposed by the IRS, less a percentage (based on his year of birth, when he elects to retire and his years of service
with TI) of the amount of compensation on which his Social Security benefit is based.
If an individual takes early retirement and chooses to begin receiving his annual retirement benefit at that time, such benefit is
reduced by an early retirement factor. As a result, the annual benefit is lower than the one he would have received at age 65.
If the participant’s employment terminates due to disability, the participant may choose to receive his accrued benefit at any time
prior to age 65. Alternatively, the participant may choose to defer receipt of the accrued benefit until reaching age 65 and then take a
disability benefit. The disability benefit paid at age 65 is based on salary and bonus, years of credited service the participant would have
accrued to age 65 had he not become disabled and disabled status.
The benefit payable in the event of death is based on salary and bonus, years of credited service and age at the time of death, and
may be in the form of a lump sum or annuity at the election of the beneficiary. The earliest date of payment is the first day of the second
calendar month following the month of death.
Leaves of absence, including a bridge to retirement, are credited to years of service under the qualified pension plan. Please see the
discussion of leaves of absence on page 90.
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plans
TI has two non-qualified pension plans: the TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan (Plan I), which governs amounts earned before
2005; and the TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan II (Plan II), which governs amounts earned after 2004. Each is a non-qualified
defined benefit pension plan. Please see page 79 for a discussion of the purpose of the plans. As with the qualified defined benefit
pension plan, employees who joined the U.S. payroll after November 30, 1997, are not eligible to participate in Plan I or Plan II. Eligibility
for normal and early retirement under these plans is the same as under the qualified plan (please see above). Benefits are paid in a
lump sum.
A participant’s benefits under Plan I and Plan II are calculated using the same formula as described above for the TI Employees
Pension Plan. However, the IRS limit on the amount of compensation on which a qualified pension benefit may be calculated does not
apply. Additionally, the IRS limit on the amount of qualified benefit the participant may receive does not apply to these plans. Once this
non-qualified benefit amount has been determined using the formula described above, the individual’s qualified benefit is subtracted
from it. The resulting difference is multiplied by an age-based factor to obtain the amount of the lump-sum benefit payable to an
individual under the non-qualified plans.
Amounts under Plan I will be distributed when payment of the participant’s benefit under the qualified pension plan commences.
Amounts under Plan II will be distributed subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the IRC. Because the named executive officers
are among the 50 most highly compensated officers of the company, Section 409A of the IRC requires that they not receive any lump
sum distribution payment under Plan II before the first day of the seventh month following termination of employment.
If a participant terminates due to disability, amounts under Plan I will be distributed when payment of the participant’s benefit under
the qualified plan commences. For amounts under Plan II, distribution is governed by Section 409A of the IRC, and the disability benefit
is reduced to reflect the payment of the benefit prior to age 65.
In the event of death, payment under both plans is based on salary and bonus, years of credited service and age at the time of death
and will be in the form of a lump sum. The earliest date of payment is the first day of the second calendar month following the month
of death.
Balances in the plans are unsecured obligations of the company. For amounts under Plan I, in the event of a change in control, the
present value of the individual’s benefit would be paid not later than the month following the month in which the change in control
occurred. For such amounts, the pre-2010 definition of a change in control (please see page 85) applies. For all amounts accrued under
this plan, if a sale of substantially all of the assets of the company occurred, the present value of the individual’s benefit would be
distributed in a lump sum as soon as reasonably practicable following the sale of assets. For amounts under Plan II, no distribution of
benefits is triggered by a change in control.
Leaves of absence, including a bridge to retirement, are credited to years of service under the non-qualified pension plans. For a
discussion of leaves of absence, please see pages 90-91.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
88 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
TI Employees Survivor Benefit Plan
TI’s qualified and non-qualified pension plans provide that upon the death of a retirement-eligible employee, the employee’s beneficiary
receives a payment equal to half of the benefit to which the employee would have been entitled under the pension plans had he retired
instead of died. We have a survivor benefit plan that pays the beneficiary a lump sum that, when added to the reduced amounts the
beneficiary receives under the pension plans, equals the benefit the employee would have been entitled to receive had he retired
instead of died. Because Messers. Templeton, March and Ritchie were eligible for early retirement in 2013, their beneficiaries would be
eligible for benefits under the survivor benefit plan if they were to die.
2013 non-qualified deferred compensation
The following table shows contributions to the named executive officer’s deferred compensation account in 2013 and the aggregate
amount of his deferred compensation as of December 31, 2013.
Name
Executive
Contributions
in Last FY ($)(1)
Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY ($)(2)
Aggregate Earnings in
Last FY ($)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions ($)
Aggregate
Balance at Last
FYE ($)(5)
R. K. Templeton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. P. March . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. T. Crutcher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. J. Ritchie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. G. Delagi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$138,819
—
$ 61,431
—
—
$121,775
—
$ 80,886
—
—
$1,717,001 (3)
$197,234 (4)
$5,762,511 (6)
$
—
91,154
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ 601,324
—
—
(1) Amounts shown consist of portions of 2013 salary and portions of their bonus for 2012 performance, which was paid in 2013.
(2) Company matching contributions pursuant to the defined contribution plan. These amounts are included in the All Other
Compensation column of the 2013 summary compensation table on page 81.
(3) Consists of: (a) $128,400 in dividend equivalents paid under the 120,000-share 1995 RSU award discussed on page 86, settlement
of which has been deferred until after termination of employment; (b) a $1,562,400 increase in the value of the RSU award
(calculated by subtracting the value of the award at year-end 2012 from the value of the award at year-end 2013 (in both cases,
the number of RSUs is multiplied by the closing price of TI common stock on the last trading date of the year)); and (c) a $26,201
gain in Mr. Templeton’s deferred compensation account in 2013. Dividend equivalents are paid at the same rate as dividends on TI
common stock.
(4) Consists of dividend equivalents paid on the RSU award discussed in note 3 and a scheduled distribution of a portion of
Mr. Templeton’s deferred compensation balance.
(5) Includes amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the current or prior-year proxy statements as follows:
Mr. Templeton, $493,311; and Mr. Crutcher, $601,324
(6) Of this amount, $5,269,200 is attributable to Mr. Templeton’s 1995 RSU award, calculated as described in note 3. The remainder is
the balance of his deferred compensation account.
Please see page 79 for a discussion of the purpose of the plan. An employee’s deferred compensation account contains eligible
compensation the employee has elected to defer and contributions by the company that are in excess of the IRS limits on
(i) contributions the company may make to the enhanced defined contribution plan and (ii) matching contributions the company may
make related to compensation the executive officer deferred into his deferred compensation account.
Participants in the deferred compensation plan may choose to defer up to (i) 25 percent of their base salary, (ii) 90 percent of their
performance bonus, and (iii) 90 percent of profit sharing. Elections to defer compensation must be made in the calendar year prior to the
year in which the compensation will be earned.
During 2013, participants could choose to have their deferred compensation mirror the performance of one or more of the following
mutual funds, each of which is managed by a third party (these alternatives, which may be changed at any time, are a subset of those
offered to participants in the defined contribution plans): Northern Trust Short Term Investment Fund, Northern Trust Aggregate Bond
Index Fund-Lending, Northern Trust Russell 1000 Value Index Fund-Lending, Northern Trust Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund-Lending,
Northern Trust Russell 2000 Index Fund-Lending, Northern Trust MidCap 400 Index Fund-Lending, Fidelity Puritan Fund, BlackRock
Equity Index Fund F, BlackRock (EAFE) (Europe, Australia, Far East) Equity Index Fund F, BlackRock Lifepath Index 2020 Fund F,
BlackRock Lifepath Index 2030 Fund F, BlackRock Lifepath Index 2040 Fund F, BlackRock Lifepath Index 2050 Fund F and BlackRock
Lifepath Index Retirement Fund F. From among the available investment alternatives, participants may change their instructions relating
to their deferred compensation daily. Earnings on a participant’s balance are determined solely by the performance of the investments
that the participant has chosen for his plan balance. The company does not guarantee any minimum return on investments. A third party
administers the company’s deferred compensation program.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 89
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT A participant may request distribution from the plan in the case of an unforeseeable emergency. To obtain an unforeseeable
emergency withdrawal, a participant must meet the requirements of Section 409A of the IRC. Otherwise, a participant’s balance is paid
pursuant to his distribution election and is subject to applicable IRC limitations.
Amounts contributed by the company, and amounts earned and deferred by the participant for which there is a valid distribution
election on file, will be distributed in accordance with the participant’s election. Annually participants may elect separate distribution
dates for deferred compensation attributable to a participant’s (i) bonus and profit sharing and (ii) salary. Participants may elect that
these distributions be in the form of a lump sum or annual installments to be paid out over a period of five or ten consecutive years.
Amounts for which no valid distribution election is on file will be distributed three years from the date of deferral.
In the event of the participant’s death, payment will be in the form of a lump sum and the earliest date of payment is the first day of
the second calendar month following the month of death.
Like the balances under the non-qualified defined benefit pension plans, deferred compensation balances are unsecured obligations
of the company. For amounts earned and deferred prior to 2010, a change in control does not trigger a distribution under the plan. For
amounts earned and deferred after 2009, distribution occurs, to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the IRC, if the participant is
involuntarily terminated within 24 months after a change in control. Change in control is the Plan definition.
Potential payments upon termination or change in control
None of the named executive officers has an employment contract with the company. They are eligible for benefits on generally the
same terms as other U.S. employees upon termination of employment or change in control of the company. TI does not reimburse
executive officers for any income or excise taxes that are payable by the executive as a result of payments relating to termination or
change in control.
Termination
The following programs may result in payments to a named executive officer whose employment terminates. Most of these programs
have been discussed above. For a discussion of the impact of these programs on the compensation decisions for 2013, please see
page 80.
Bonus. Our policies concerning bonus and the timing of payments are described on page 71. Whether a bonus would be awarded
under other circumstances and in what amount would depend on the facts and circumstances of termination and is subject to the
Compensation Committee’s discretion. If awarded, bonuses are paid by the company.
Qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans. The purposes of these plans are described on page 79. The formula for
determining benefits, the forms of benefit and the timing of payments are described on page 88. The amounts disbursed under the
qualified and non-qualified plans are paid, respectively, by the TI Employees Pension Trust and the company.
Survivor benefit plan. The purpose of this plan is described on page 89. The formula for determining the amount of benefit, the form of
benefit and the timing of payments are described on page 89. Amounts distributed are paid by the TI Employees Health Benefit Trust.
Deferred compensation plan. The purpose of this plan is described on page 79. The amounts payable under this program depend
solely on the performance of investments that the participant has chosen for his plan balance. The timing of payments is discussed on
page 90. Amounts distributed are paid by the company.
Equity compensation. Depending on the circumstances of termination, grantees whose employment terminates may retain the right
to exercise previously granted stock options and receive shares under outstanding RSU awards. Please see pages 85-86. RSU awards
include a right to receive dividend equivalents. The dividend equivalents are paid annually by the company in a single cash payment
after the last dividend payment of the year.
Perquisites. Financial counseling is available to executive officers in the year after retirement. Otherwise, no perquisites continue after
termination of employment.
In the case of a resignation pursuant to a separation arrangement, an executive officer (like other employees above a certain job grade
level) will typically be offered a 12-month paid leave of absence before termination, in exchange for a non-compete and non-solicitation
commitment and a release of claims against the company. The leave period will be credited to years of service under the pension plans
described above. During the leave, the executive officer’s stock options will continue to become exercisable and his RSUs will continue
to vest. Amounts paid to an individual during a paid leave of absence are not counted when calculating benefits under the qualified and
non-qualified pension plans.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
90 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
In the case of a separation arrangement in which the paid leave of absence expires when the executive officer will be at least
50 years old and have at least 15 years of employment with the company, the separation arrangement will typically include an unpaid
leave of absence, to commence at the end of the paid leave and end when the executive officer has reached the earlier of age 55 with
at least 20 years of employment or age 60 (bridge to retirement). The bridge to retirement will be credited to years of service under
the qualified and non-qualified defined benefit plans described above. Stock options will continue to become exercisable and RSUs will
remain in effect, but for grants made before 2013, the number of RSUs will be reduced as described in note * on page 86.
Change in Control
Our only program, plan or arrangement providing benefits triggered by a change in control is the TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension
Plan. A change in control at December 31, 2013, would have accelerated payment of the balance under that plan. Please see page 88
for a discussion of the purpose of change in control provisions of that plan as well as the circumstances and the timing of payment.
Upon a change in control there is no acceleration of vesting of stock options and RSUs granted after 2009. Only after an involuntary
termination (not for cause) within 24 months after a change in control of TI will the vesting of such stock options and RSUs accelerate.
Please see pages 85-86 for further information concerning change in control provisions relating to stock options and RSUs.
For a discussion of the impact of these programs on the compensation decisions for 2013, please see page 80.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 91
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT The table below shows the potential payments upon termination or change in control for each of the named executive officers.
Qualified
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plan
Non-
Qualified
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plan
Non-
Qualified
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plan II
Deferred
Compensation
RSUs
Stock
Options
Total
R. K. Templeton (10)
Disability . . . . . . . . . . $ 887,933 (1) $609,677 (2) $ 194,659 (2)
Death . . . . . . . . . . . $ 431,223 (5) $181,262 (5) $ 132,340 (5) $493,311 (6) $34,396,196 (3) $69,179,891 (4) $105,535,581 (11)
Involuntary Termination
— $34,396,196 (3) $69,179,891 (4) $105,268,356
for Cause . . . . . . . $ 848,862 (7) $356,674 (7) $ 260,647 (7)
— $ 5,269,200 (8)
— $
6,735,383
Resignation; Involuntary
Termination
(Not for Cause) . . . . $ 848,862 (7) $356,674 (7) $ 260,647 (7)
Retirement . . . . . . . . . $ 848,862 (7) $356,674 (7) $ 260,647 (7)
Change in Control . . . . .
— $356,674 (7)
—
— $23,912,683 (12) $69,179,891 (4) $ 94,558,757
$23,912,683 (12) $69,179,891 (4) $ 94,558,757
5,625,874
— $ 5,269,200 (8)
— $
K. P. March (10)
Disability . . . . . . . . . $1,508,177 (1) $349,792 (2) $5,274,873 (2)
Death . . . . . . . . . . . $ 573,795 (5) $110,610 (5) $2,654,636 (5)
Involuntary Termination
— $ 8,763,777 (3) $12,955,675 (4) $ 28,852,294
— $ 8,763,777 (3) $12,955,675 (4) $ 28,103,600 (11)
for Cause . . . . . . . $1,097,086 (7) $213,901 (7) $5,073,161 (7)
—
—
— $
6,384,148
Resignation; Involuntary
Termination
(Not for Cause) . . . . $1,097,086 (7) $213,901 (7) $5,073,161 (7)
Retirement . . . . . . . . . $1,097,086 (7) $213,901 (7) $5,073,161 (7)
Change in Control . . . . .
— $213,901 (7)
—
— $ 5,520,848 (12) $12,955,675 (4) $ 24,860,671
$ 5,520,848 (12) $12,955,675 (4) $ 24,860,671
213,901
— $
—
—
B. T. Crutcher
Disability . . . . . . . . . $
Death . . . . . . . . . . . $
Involuntary Termination
10,098 (1)
1,767 (5)
for Cause . . . . . . . $
3,496 (7)
Resignation; Involuntary
Termination
(Not for Cause) . . . . $
Change in Control . . . . .
3,496 (7)
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $19,393,598 (3) $ 6,752,375 (4) $ 26,156,071
—
— $601,324 (6) $19,393,598 (3) $ 6,752,375 (4) $ 26,749,064
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
3,496
$ 1,092,156 (9) $
—
1,095,652
—
K. J. Ritchie (10)
Disability . . . . . . . . . $1,918,444 (1) $926,549 (2) $6,404,365 (2)
Death . . . . . . . . . . . $ 815,169 (5) $310,997 (5) $3,223,065 (5)
Involuntary Termination
— $10,611,686 (3) $10,836,063 (4) $ 30,697,107
— $10,611,686 (3) $10,836,063 (4) $ 29,982,154 (11)
for Cause . . . . . . . $1,599,590 (7) $607,844 (7) $6,326,971 (7)
—
—
— $
8,534,405
Resignation; Involuntary
Termination
(Not for Cause) . . . . $1,599,590 (7) $607,844 (7) $6,326,971 (7)
Retirement . . . . . . . . $1,599,590 (7) $607,844 (7) $6,326,971 (7)
Change in Control . . . . .
— $607,844 (7)
—
— $ 6,815,359 (12) $10,836,063 (4) $ 26,185,827
— $ 6,815,359 (12) $10,836,063 (4) $ 26,185,827
607,844
—
— $
—
R. G. Delagi
Disability . . . . . . . . . $1,865,870 (1) $522,241 (2) $3,475,010 (2)
Death . . . . . . . . . . . $ 369,408 (5) $139,569 (5) $1,377,488 (5)
Involuntary Termination
for Cause . . . . . . . $ 663,345 (7) $251,631 (7) $2,472,547 (7)
Resignation; Involuntary
Termination
(Not for Cause) . . . . $ 663,345 (7) $251,631 (7) $2,472,547 (7)
Change in Control . . . . .
— $251,631 (7)
—
— $12,752,298 (3) $13,776,275 (4) $ 32,391,694
— $12,752,298 (3) $13,776,275 (4) $ 28,415,038
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
3,387,523
$ 8,326,071 (9) $ 11,713,594
251,631
— $
92 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
(1) The amount shown is the lump-sum benefit payable at age 65 to the named executive officer in the event of termination as of
December 31, 2013, due to disability, assuming the named executive officer does not request payment of his disability benefit until
age 65. The assumptions used in calculating these amounts are the same as the age-65 lump-sum assumptions used for financial
reporting purposes for the company’s audited financial statements for 2013 and are described in note 5 to the 2013 pension
benefits table on page 87.
(2) The amount shown is the lump-sum benefit payable at age 65, in the case of the Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan, or
separation from service in the case of Plan II. The assumptions used are the same as those described in note 1 above.
(3) Calculated by multiplying the number of outstanding RSUs by the closing price of TI common stock as of December 31, 2013
($43.91). In the event of termination due to disability or death all outstanding awards will continue to vest according to their terms.
Please see the outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2013 table on pages 84-85 for the number of unvested RSUs as of
December 31, 2013, and page 86 for a discussion of an additional outstanding RSU award held by Mr. Templeton.
(4) Calculated as the difference between the grant price of all outstanding in-the-money options and the closing price of TI common
stock as of December 31, 2013 ($43.91), multiplied by the number of shares under such options as of December 31, 2013.
(5) Value of the benefit payable in a lump sum to the executive officer’s beneficiary calculated as required by the terms of the plan
assuming the earliest possible payment date. The plan provides that in the event of death, the beneficiary receives 50 percent of
the participant’s accrued benefit, reduced by the age-applicable joint and 50 percent survivor factor.
(6) Balance as of December 31, 2013, under the non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
(7) Lump-sum value of the accrued benefit as of December 31, 2013, calculated as required by the terms of the plans assuming the
earliest possible payment date.
(8) Calculated by multiplying 120,000 vested RSUs by the closing price of TI common stock as of December 31, 2013 ($43.91). See
page 86 for further information about this award.
(9) Calculated as the difference between the grant price of all exercisable in-the-money options and the closing price of TI common
stock as of December 31, 2013 ($43.91), multiplied by the number of shares under such options as of December 31, 2013.
(10) Messrs. Templeton, March and Ritchie were eligible to retire as of December 31, 2013.
(11) Due to retirement eligibility, the total includes the value of the benefit payable in a lump sum under the Survivor Benefit Plan to the
officer’s beneficiary in the following amounts: Mr. Templeton $721,358, Mr. March $3,045,107 and Mr. Ritchie $4,185,174. The
amount of the benefit is calculated as required by the terms of the plan assuming the earliest possible payment date.
(12) Due to retirement eligibility, calculated by multiplying the number of outstanding RSUs held at such termination by the closing price
of TI common stock as of December 31, 2013 ($43.91). RSU awards stay in effect and pay out shares according to the vesting
schedule, although for grants made before 2013, the number of shares is reduced according to the duration of employment over
the vesting period. See page 86 for additional details.
AudiT COMMiTTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee of the board of directors has furnished the following report:
As noted in the committee’s charter, TI management is responsible for preparing the company’s financial statements. The company’s
independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the financial statements. The activities of the committee are in
no way designed to supersede or alter those traditional responsibilities. The committee’s role does not provide any special assurances
with regard to TI’s financial statements, nor does it involve a professional evaluation of the quality of the audits performed by the
independent registered public accounting firm.
The committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the independent accounting firm, as appropriate, (1) the audited
financial statements and (2) management’s report on internal control over financial reporting and the independent accounting firm’s
related opinions.
The committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young, the required communications
specified by auditing standards together with guidelines established by the SEC and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
The committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required
by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, regarding the independent registered public
accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Ernst & Young the
firm’s independence.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the committee recommended to the board of directors that the audited
financial statements be included in the company’s annual report on Form 10-K for 2013 for filing with the SEC.
Ralph W. Babb, Jr., Chair
Mark A. Blinn
Ruth J. Simmons
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 93
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT PROPOSAl TO RATifY APPOiNTMENT Of iNdEPENdENT REgiSTEREd PubliC
ACCOuNTiNg fiRM
The Audit Committee of the board has the authority and responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the
work of TI’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP to be TI’s independent
registered public accounting firm for 2014.
TI has engaged Ernst & Young or a predecessor firm to serve as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for
over 60 years. In order to assure continuing auditor independence, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether the annual audit
of TI’s financial statements should be conducted by another firm.
The lead audit partner on the TI engagement serves no more than five consecutive years in that role, in accordance with SEC rules.
The Audit Committee Chair and management have direct input into the selection of lead audit partner.
The members of the Audit Committee and the board believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young to serve as the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interest of the Company and its investors. Consequently, the board asks
the stockholders to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will
consider whether it should appoint another independent registered public accounting firm.
Representatives of Ernst & Young are expected to be present, and to be available to respond to appropriate questions, at the annual
meeting. They have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so; they have indicated that, as of this date, they do not.
The company has paid fees to Ernst & Young for the services described below:
Audit fees. Ernst & Young’s Audit Fees were $8,662,000 in 2013 and $8,384,000 in 2012. The services provided in exchange for these
fees were our annual audit, including the audit of internal control over financial reporting, reports on Form 10-Q, assistance with public
debt offerings, and statutory audits required internationally.
Audit-related fees. In addition to the Audit Fees, the company paid Ernst & Young $685,000 in 2013 and $761,000 in 2012. The
services provided in exchange for these fees included acquisition due diligence and related procedures, employee benefit plan audits,
certification procedures relating to compliance with local-government or other regulatory standards for various non-U.S. subsidiaries,
and access to Ernst & Young’s online research tool.
Tax fees. Ernst & Young’s fees for professional services rendered for tax compliance (preparation and review of income tax returns and
other tax-related filings) and tax advice on U.S. and foreign tax matters were $1,836,000 in 2013 and $4,380,000 in 2012.
All other fees. Ernst & Young’s fees for all other professional services rendered were $95,000 in 2013 and $635,000 in 2012 for
assistance with insurance claims, the TI Foundation audit and training.
Pre-approval policy. The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services to be performed by the
independent registered public accounting firm in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the firm’s
independence.
Annually the independent registered public accounting firm and the director of internal audits present to the Audit Committee
services expected to be performed by the firm over the next 12 months. The Audit Committee reviews and, as it deems appropriate,
pre-approves those services. The services and estimated fees are presented to the Audit Committee for consideration in the following
categories: Audit, Audit-related, Tax and All other (each as defined in Schedule 14A of the Securities Exchange Act). For each service
listed in those categories, the committee receives detailed documentation indicating the specific services to be provided. The term
of any pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different
period. The Audit Committee reviews on at least a quarterly basis the services provided to date by the firm and the fees incurred
for those services. The Audit Committee may revise the list of pre-approved services and related fees from time to time, based on
subsequent determinations.
In order to respond to time-sensitive requests for services that may arise between regularly scheduled meetings of the Audit
Committee, the committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its Chair (the Audit Committee does not delegate to management its
responsibilities to pre-approve services). The Chair reports pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee and seeks ratification of such
decisions at the Audit Committee’s next scheduled meeting.
The Audit Committee or its Chair pre-approved all services provided by Ernst & Young during 2013.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the company’s
independent registered public accounting firm for 2014.
94 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
PROPOSAl TO APPROVE THE Ti EMPlOYEES 2014 STOCK PuRCHASE PlAN
The board of directors is requesting that stockholders approve the TI Employees 2014 Stock Purchase Plan (the “2014 ESPP”). The
board believes the 2014 ESPP is in the best interest of stockholders as it enhances broad-based employee stock ownership (thus further
aligning the interest of employees with TI stockholders) and helps the company attract, motivate and retain employees.
The full text of the 2014 ESPP is Exhibit A to this proxy statement. The principal features of the 2014 ESPP are summarized below.
The description below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the 2014 ESPP. The terms of the 2014 ESPP are substantially
similar to those of the TI Employees 2005 Stock Purchase Plan (the “2005 ESPP”) that was approved by stockholders in April 2005. No
offerings under the 2005 ESPP will be made following the completion of any offering pending on the effective date of the 2014 ESPP.
Key plan provisions
Eligibility
All employees of TI, and such of its subsidiaries as the Compensation Committee of the company’s board of directors shall designate,
who are employees on the date of grant of the option (including those on paid or unpaid leave of absence if the company expects that
the employee will return to work), will be eligible to participate in offerings of options under the 2014 ESPP. On or prior to the date
of grant, the Compensation Committee will determine the effect of an employee’s termination of employment during the term of the
offering. Directors who are not employees will not be eligible to participate in the 2014 ESPP.
Offerings
Each year during the term of the 2014 ESPP, unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, TI will make one or more offers
to each eligible employee of options to purchase TI common stock. Each eligible employee will be entitled to purchase up to a number
or dollar amount of shares as the Compensation Committee may determine (but not exceeding the amount specified in Section 423(b)
of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”)) for the offering. The option price for each offering will be determined by the Compensation
Committee and will not be less than (1) 85% of the fair market value of TI common stock on the date of grant of the option or (2) 85% of
the fair market value of TI common stock on the date the option is exercised, whichever is lower. The date of grant will be as determined
by the Compensation Committee. The fair market value of TI stock will be determined by the method or procedure established by the
Compensation Committee. The closing price for TI common stock on February 18, 2014, was $44.01.
The expiration date of the options will be determined for each offering by the Compensation Committee but will not be later than
27 months from the date of grant of the option.
The term of an option will consist of an Enrollment Period, a Payroll Deduction Period and an Exercise Day. The beginning and
ending dates of each Enrollment Period and Payroll Deduction Period and the date of each Exercise Day will be determined by the
Compensation Committee. The employee may elect to be automatically re-enrolled in subsequent offerings. The employee’s election
to participate in the offering will indicate the dollar amount of shares for which the employee wishes to participate and, unless
prohibited by local law, will authorize payroll deductions to be made over the Payroll Deduction Period. If local law prohibits payroll
deductions, the Compensation Committee may determine an alternative method of payment. During the Payroll Deduction Period, the
Compensation Committee may allow participants to cancel or reduce (or both) their payment authorizations. After completion of the
Payroll Deduction Period, the option will be automatically exercised on the Exercise Day and shares will be purchased with the amount
in the employee’s account.
Under the 2005 ESPP, options are currently granted in four sets of offerings each year on the first day that the NASDAQ Stock
Market is open for trading in December, March, June and September. The Payroll Deduction Period consists of three calendar months
beginning on the first day of the calendar month following the grant date. The Exercise Day is the first day on which the NASDAQ Stock
Market is open for trading after the end of the Payroll Deduction Period. The board of directors anticipates that offerings under the 2014
ESPP will operate in a similar manner.
An employee will not be granted an option under the 2014 ESPP if the employee, immediately after the option is granted, owns
stock having 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the company. No employee will be
granted an option under the 2014 ESPP that permits the employee to accrue rights to purchase stock under all employee stock
purchase plans of the company at a rate that exceeds $25,000 (or such other maximum as may be prescribed from time to time under
the Code) of the fair market value of such stock (determined at the date of grant).
Transfer
An option granted under the 2014 ESPP may not be transferred except by will or the laws of descent and distribution and, during the
lifetime of the employee to whom granted, may be exercised only for the benefit of the employee.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 95
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT Authorized shares and adjustments
No more than 40,000,000 shares of TI common stock may be sold pursuant to the 2014 ESPP, subject to adjustments as described
below.
If the Compensation Committee determines that an adjustment is appropriate by reason of any dividend or other distribution,
recapitalization, stock split, or other similar corporate transaction or event (as more fully described in the 2014 ESPP under the heading
“Adjustments”), it will adjust any or all of (1) the number and type of shares that may be made subject to options, (2) the number and
type of shares subject to outstanding options, and (3) the grant, purchase or exercise price with respect to any option.
Either authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares may be made subject to options under the 2014 ESPP. Any shares not
purchased prior to the termination of an option may be again subjected to an option under the 2014 ESPP.
Administration
The 2014 ESPP will be administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will have full power and authority
to construe, interpret and administer the 2014 ESPP. The Compensation Committee may delegate such power, authority and rights
with respect to the administration of the 2014 ESPP (including, without limitation, the designation of subsidiaries whose employees
may participate in offerings and the exclusion of employees from specified offerings, in each case to the extent permitted by Section
423 of the Code) as it deems appropriate to one or more members of the management of TI; provided, however, that any delegation to
management will conform with the requirements of applicable law and stock exchange regulations.
Amendment, sub-plans and termination
The Compensation Committee may, at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, suspend or terminate the 2014 ESPP. The
Compensation Committee may also recommend to the board revisions of the 2014 ESPP. However, unless the stockholders of TI have
first approved thereof, (1) the total number of shares for which options may be exercised under the 2014 ESPP will not be increased
or decreased, except as described above in “Authorized shares and adjustments,” and (2) no amendment may be made that allows an
option price for offerings under the 2014 ESPP to be less than 85% of the fair market value of the common stock of TI on the date of
grant of the options or, if lower, 85% of the fair market value of the common stock of TI on the date on which an option is exercised.
The Compensation Committee may also adopt and amend stock purchase sub-plans for employees of subsidiaries with such
provisions as are appropriate to conform with local laws, practices and procedures. All such sub-plans will be subject to the limitations
on the amount of stock that may be issued under the 2014 ESPP.
No offering may be made under the 2014 ESPP after April 17, 2024.
New plan benefits and participation
Each executive officer of the company qualifies for participation under the 2014 ESPP and may be eligible to annually purchase up to
$25,000 worth of the company’s stock at a discount below the market price. However, participation in the 2014 ESPP is voluntary and
dependent upon the executive officer’s election to participate, and the benefit of participating will depend on the terms of the offerings
(if any) and fair market value of the stock on the Exercise Day. Accordingly, future benefits that would be received by the executive
officers and other eligible employees under the proposed 2014 ESPP are not determinable at this time. The table below sets forth the
shares purchased by the named executive officers and other employees under the 2005 ESPP during 2013.
Name and Position
Shares Purchased (#)
R. K. Templeton, Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. P. March, Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. T. Crutcher, Senior Vice President . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. J. Ritchie, Senior Vice President . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. G. Delagi, Senior Vice President . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Group. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-Executive Director Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-Executive Officer Employee Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
703
703
703
—
396
27,198
N/A
2,357,131
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
As of December 31, 2013, 20,172,113 shares have been purchased under the 2005 ESPP; 22,265,577 shares remained available for
future grants; 485,408 shares were subject to outstanding options and approximately 32,600 employees were eligible to participate in
the 2005 ESPP.
96 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
u.S. federal tax consequences
The following summary is limited to the U.S. federal tax laws. It does not include the tax laws of any municipality, state or foreign
country in which the participant resides.
The 2014 ESPP is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Code. However, TI does not
undertake to maintain such status throughout the term of the 2014 ESPP.
In accordance with SEC rules, the following description of tax matters relating to the 2014 ESPP is provided. In general, a participant
has no taxable event at the time of grant of an option or at the time of exercise of an option, but will realize taxable income at the time
the participant sells the shares acquired under the 2014 ESPP.
If the participant observes certain holding period requirements, the participant’s gain on sale will generally be taxed at capital gains
rates, except that in certain circumstances a portion of the participant’s gain will be treated as ordinary income. Those circumstances
will generally occur if the exercise price of the shares is established as a percentage less than 100% of the fair market value of the
shares at the beginning of the offering period, or if at the beginning of the period it is unknown what the exercise price will be, for
example, if the exercise price can be determined only on the Exercise Day. The participant’s ordinary income will not be greater than
the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares at the time of grant over the exercise price (or, if lower, the actual proceeds
of sale over the actual purchase price of the shares). If the exercise price is a function of the value of the shares on the Exercise Day,
the exercise price will be determined as if the option was exercised at the time of grant for purposes of calculating this limit. If the
participant sells the shares only after satisfying the holding period requirements, the company will not be entitled to a deduction.
If the participant sells the shares before satisfying the holding period requirements, then the participant will realize ordinary
income in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the stock on the Exercise Day. The
company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. The remainder of the proceeds of sale will be taxed at capital gains rates.
The board of directors recommends a vote “FOR” the TI Employees 2014 Stock Purchase Plan.
PROPOSAl TO REAPPROVE THE MATERiAl TERMS Of THE PERfORMANCE gOAlS
uNdER THE TEXAS iNSTRuMENTS 2009 lONg-TERM iNCENTiVE PlAN
The board asks stockholders to reapprove the material terms of performance goals that may apply to awards under the Texas
Instruments 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”). Reapproval of the material terms of the performance goals is sought with
the intent of satisfying a requirement for tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”).
Section 162(m) imposes an annual limit of $1 million on the amount that a public company may deduct for federal income tax
purposes for compensation it has paid to its chief executive officer or to any of its other three most highly compensated executive
officers (other than the chief financial officer). The tax deduction limit does not apply to “qualified performance-based compensation”
under Section 162(m). Restricted stock units and certain other types of awards may be considered qualified performance-based
compensation if, among other things, they are subject to performance goals, the material terms of which have been approved by
stockholders not less than five years before the grant date of such restricted stock units or awards. For purposes of Section 162(m),
the material terms of the performance goals under the 2009 Plan include: (1) the employees eligible to receive compensation; (2) a
description of the business criteria on which the performance goals are based; and (3) the maximum amount of compensation that
could be paid to any employee under the 2009 Plan if the performance goals are satisfied.
Stockholders approved the 2009 Plan, including the material terms of the performance goals under the 2009 Plan, in April 2009.
Because almost five years have passed since that approval, the board is submitting this proposal to stockholders for reapproval of the
material terms of the performance goals set forth in the 2009 Plan for purposes of Section 162(m). This proposal does not seek to
amend or alter the performance goals or any other terms of the 2009 Plan.
If stockholders do not approve this proposal, the company will still be able to make awards under the 2009 Plan, but awards (other
than stock options and stock appreciation rights) will be subject to the tax deduction limit under Section 162(m) even if they have been
granted subject to the achievement of performance goals. (Stock options granted under the 2009 Plan are intended to be qualified
performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) because, among other things, the stock options are granted with an exercise
price of no less than the fair market value of TI’s stock on the grant date. The same would be true for stock appreciation rights, if TI were
to grant them under the 2009 Plan.) In addition, even if this proposal is approved by stockholders, nothing in this proposal precludes the
company from granting awards that are not intended to be qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).
Stockholder approval of the material terms of the performance goals is only one of several requirements to be satisfied if
compensation is to be qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). This proposal should not be viewed as a
guarantee that TI will be able to deduct for federal income tax purposes compensation that is intended to be performance-based
compensation under Section 162(m).
The 2009 Plan is attached as Exhibit B. The description below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the 2009 Plan.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 97
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT Material terms of performance goals under the 2009 Plan
The 2009 Plan provides for the grant of the following types of awards: (1) stock options, (2) restricted stock and restricted stock units,
(3) performance units and (4) other awards (including stock appreciation rights) valued in whole or in part by reference to or otherwise
based on common stock of the company. Employees of the company and its subsidiaries and affiliates are eligible to receive awards
under the 2009 Plan. The Compensation Committee of the company’s board of directors, which consists exclusively of “outside
directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m), may grant awards under the 2009 Plan to eligible grantees in its discretion. We
currently have approximately 32,000 employees, including 14 executive officers. Substitute awards may be made in case of acquisitions
and business combinations. While the plan also provides that awards may be granted to independent contractors, no award has been
granted under the 2009 Plan to an independent contractor of the company or any subsidiary or affiliate, and none will be granted in the
future under the 2009 Plan. Directors who are not employees of the company are not eligible to receive awards under the 2009 Plan.
Under the 2009 Plan, any award may, but need not, be subject to the satisfaction of one or more performance goals. Awards will be
made subject to one or more performance goals if the Compensation Committee determines that such awards are in the best interest of
the company and its stockholders.
Awards (other than stock options and stock appreciation rights) intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m) will be granted subject to performance goals based on one or more of the following business criteria as applied, in
the Compensation Committee’s discretion, on an absolute basis or relative to other companies: cash flow; cycle time; earnings before
income taxes; earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization; earnings per share; free cash flow; gross profit; gross profit
margin; manufacturing process yield; market share; net income; net revenue per employee; operating profit, return on assets; return on
capital; return on common equity; return on invested capital; return on net assets; revenue growth; or total stockholder return.
Under the 2009 Plan, no individual may receive stock options and stock appreciation rights, considered together, for more than
4,000,000 shares in any calendar year. In any calendar year, no individual may be granted awards under the 2009 Plan (other than stock
options or stock appreciation rights) intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) that exceed, in the
aggregate, $5,000,000 or, if denominated in shares, 4,000,000 shares.
Summary of other features of the 2009 Plan
The summary below is intended to provide context for the performance goals that stockholders are being asked to reapprove.
Under the 2009 Plan, the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance is 75,000,000 shares, plus shares subject
to any award made under a previous long-term incentive plan that are not issued due to termination or cancellation of the award.
The number of authorized shares may be adjusted in the case of a dividend or other distribution, recapitalization, stock split, or other
corporate event or transaction (more fully described in Section 5(e) of the 2009 Plan). As of December 31, 2013, 58,519,758 shares
remain available to be awarded, plus any additional shares underlying outstanding awards that may again become available for award
pursuant to the terms of the 2009 Plan.
The Compensation Committee has the sole discretion to administer the 2009 Plan, grant awards under the 2009 Plan and determine
the terms, timing, transferability and method of exercise of awards, as applicable.
Except in the case of awards granted through assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted by
an acquired company, and except as a result of an adjustment event specified in Section 5(e) of the 2009 Plan, stock options and
other stock-based awards under the 2009 Plan with an exercise or a purchase price will not have an exercise or a purchase price (or
equivalent) of less than 100% of the fair market value of the stock on the date the Compensation Committee grants the stock option or
award. Determinations of fair market value under the 2009 Plan are made in accordance with methods or procedures established by the
Compensation Committee.
No awards may be granted under the 2009 Plan after April 16, 2019, the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the 2009 Plan.
The board of directors may amend, alter, discontinue or terminate the 2009 Plan or any portion of the plan at any time. However,
stockholder approval must be obtained for any plan adjustment that would increase the number of shares available for awards except
as permitted by Section 5(e) of the 2009 Plan.
New plan benefits
The benefits or amounts that individuals will receive in the future under the 2009 Plan are not determinable. In 2013, the named
executive officers were granted awards as set forth in the grants of plan-based awards in 2013 table on page 83. In 2013, the executive
officers as a group were granted awards for 3,043,336 shares (consisting of stock options for 2,282,500 shares and 760,836 restricted
stock units), and non-executive officer employees as a group were granted awards for 14,923,563 shares (consisting of stock options
for 10,575,056 shares and 4,348,507 restricted stock units). Non-employee directors are not eligible for awards under the plan.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
98 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Tax matters
The following summary is limited to the U.S. federal tax laws. It does not include the tax laws of any municipality, state or foreign
country in which the participant resides.
Stock options: Counsel for the company has advised that a participant will recognize no income under the Code upon the receipt of
any stock option award. In the case of an incentive stock option, if a participant exercises the stock option during or within three months
of employment and does not dispose of the shares within two years of the date of grant or one year after the transfer of the shares to
the participant, the participant will be entitled for federal income tax purposes to treat any profit which may be recognized upon the
disposition of the shares as a long-term capital gain. In contrast, a participant who receives a stock option under the 2009 Plan that is
not an incentive stock option or who does not comply with the conditions noted above will generally recognize ordinary income at the
time of exercise in the amount of the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise over the stock option
price. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. The
company should be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of ordinary income, if any, recognized
by a participant who (a) exercises a stock option that is not an incentive stock option, or (b) disposes of stock that was acquired
pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option prior to the end of the required holding period described above, except to the
extent such tax deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code. In the case of incentive stock options, any excess of the fair
market value of the stock at the time of exercise over the stock option price would be an item of income for purposes of the participant’s
alternative minimum tax.
Restricted stock units: Counsel for the company has advised that a participant will recognize no income under the Code upon the
receipt of a restricted stock unit award. Upon the settlement of a restricted stock unit award, participants will recognize ordinary income
in the year of receipt in an amount equal to the fair market value of any shares received. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary
income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. Upon the sale of any shares received, any gain or loss,
based on the difference between the sale price and the fair market value on the date of settlement, will be taxed as capital gain or loss.
The company should be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by
the participant on the determination date, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code.
The board of directors recommends a vote “FOR” the proposal to reapprove the material terms of the performance goals
under the Texas Instruments 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
EquiTY COMPENSATiON PlAN iNfORMATiON
The following table sets forth information about the company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2013:
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . . . . .
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number of
Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
(a)
69,531,305 (1)
16,905,929 (4)
86,437,234 (5)
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
(b)
$ 29.06 (2)
$ 28.98 (2)
$ 29.04
Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future
Issuance
under Equity
Compensation Plans
(excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))
(c)
82,504,240 (3)
0
82,504,240
(1) Includes shares of TI common stock to be issued under the Texas Instruments 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”)
and predecessor plans, the Texas Instruments 2009 Director Compensation Plan (the “Director Plan”) and the TI Employees 2005
Stock Purchase Plan. Also includes 798,275 shares of TI common stock to be issued upon settlement of outstanding awards granted
under the National Semiconductor Corporation 2009 Incentive Award Plan, a plan approved by National stockholders. The company
assumed the awards in connection with its acquisition of National.
(2) Restricted stock units and stock units credited to directors’ deferred compensation accounts are settled in shares of TI common
stock on a one-for-one basis. Accordingly, such units have been excluded for purposes of computing the weighted-average
exercise price.
(3) Shares of TI common stock available for future issuance under the 2009 Plan, the Director Plan and the TI Employees 2005 Stock
Purchase Plan. 58,519,758 shares remain available for future issuance under the 2009 Plan and 1,718,905 shares remain available
for future issuance under the Director Plan. Under the 2009 Plan and the Director Plan shares may be granted in the form of
restricted stock units, options or other stock-based awards such as restricted stock.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 99
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT (4) Includes shares to be issued under the Texas Instruments 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2003 Plan”). The 2003 Plan was
replaced by the 2009 Plan, which was approved by stockholders. No further grants may be made under the 2003 Plan. Only non-
management employees were eligible to receive awards under the 2003 Plan. The 2003 Plan authorized the grant of: (1) stock
options, (2) restricted stock and restricted stock units, (3) performance units and (4) other awards (including stock appreciation
rights) valued in whole or in part by reference to or otherwise based on common stock of the company. The plan is administered
by a committee of independent directors (the Committee). The Committee had the sole discretion to grant to eligible participants
one or more equity awards and to determine the number or amount of any award. Except in the case of awards made through
assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted by an acquired company, and except as a result of an
adjustment event such as a stock split, the exercise price under any stock option, the grant price of any stock appreciation right,
and the purchase price of any security that could be purchased under any other stock-based award under the 2003 Plan could not
be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of the stock or other security on the effective date of the grant of the option, right
or award.
Also includes shares to be issued under the Texas Instruments Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, the Texas Instruments
Restricted Stock Unit Plan for Directors and the Texas Instruments Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors. These plans were
replaced by the Texas Instruments 2003 Director Compensation Plan (which was replaced by the stockholder-approved Director
Plan), and no further grants may be made under them.
(5) Includes 64,930,540 shares for issuance upon exercise of outstanding grants of options, 20,892,022 shares for issuance upon
vesting of outstanding grants of restricted stock units, 485,408 shares for issuance under the TI Employees 2005 Stock Purchase
Plan and 129,264 shares for issuance in settlement of directors’ deferred compensation accounts.
AddiTiONAl iNfORMATiON
Voting securities
As of February 18, 2014, 1,081,741,385 shares of TI common stock were outstanding. This is the only class of capital stock entitled
to vote at the meeting. Each holder of common stock has one vote for each share held. As stated in the notice of annual meeting,
holders of record of the common stock at the close of business on February 18, 2014, may vote at the meeting or any adjournment of
the meeting.
Security ownership of certain beneficial owners
The following table shows the only persons who have reported beneficial ownership of more than 5 percent of the common stock of the
company. Persons generally “beneficially own” shares if they have the right to either vote those shares or dispose of them. More than
one person may be considered to beneficially own the same shares.
Name and Address
Capital World Investors (1)
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shares Owned at
December 31, 2013
Percent
of Class
112,368,791 (2)
10.3%
Capital Research Global Investors (1)
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
98,294,972 (3)
9.0%
PRIMECAP Management Company
225 South Lake Ave., #400
Pasadena, CA 91101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
56,770,524 (4)
5.19%
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
100 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
(1) A division of Capital Research and Management Company (CRMC).
(2) TI understands that Capital World Investors is deemed to be the beneficial owner of these shares as a result of CRMC acting as an
investment advisor to various investment companies. Capital World Investors has sole voting power and sole dispositive power for
these shares.
(3) TI understands that Capital Research Global Investors is deemed to be the beneficial owner of these shares as a result of CRMC
acting as an investment advisor to various investment companies. Capital Research Global Investors has sole dispositive power and
sole voting power for these shares.
(4) TI understands that PRIMECAP Management Company has sole voting power for 12,673,674 and sole dispositive power for
56,770,524 of these shares.
Security ownership of directors and management
The following table shows the beneficial ownership of TI common stock by directors, the named executive officers and all executive
officers and directors as a group. Each director and named executive officer has sole voting power (except for shares obtainable within
60 days, shares subject to RSUs and shares credited to deferred compensation accounts as detailed in the footnotes to the table) and
sole investment power with respect to the shares owned. The table excludes shares held by a family member if a director or executive
officer has disclaimed beneficial ownership. No director or executive officer has pledged shares of TI common stock.
Name
Directors (1)
R. W. Babb, Jr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M. A. Blinn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D. A. Carp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. S. Cox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. Kirk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
P. H. Patsley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. E. Sanchez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
W. R. Sanders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. J. Simmons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. K. Templeton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. T. Whitman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management (2)
K. P. March . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. T. Crutcher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. J. Ritchie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. G. Delagi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shares Owned at
December 31, 2013
Percent
of Class
40,465
3,867
123,772
85,406
2,000
131,628
17,903
90,736
98,472
4,576,556
105,163
986,809
714,019
848,064
902,748
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
All executive officers and directors as a group (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12,644,961
1.17%
*
less than 1 percent
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 101
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT
(1) Included in the shares owned shown above are:
Directors
Shares
Obtainable
within 60 Days
Shares
Credited to
401(k) Account
RSUs
(in Shares) (a)
R. W. Babb, Jr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M. A. Blinn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D. A. Carp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. S. Cox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. Kirk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
P. H. Patsley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. E. Sanchez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
W. R. Sanders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. J. Simmons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. K. Templeton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. T. Whitman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17,266
—
60,266
60,266
—
75,266
9,765
55,016
53,266
3,300,856
75,266
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
12,511
—
11,025
2,000
27,689
21,025
2,000
13,525
8,138
21,125
27,025
783,334
21,025
Shares
Credited
to Deferred
Compensation
Accounts (b)
11,174
1,867
35,817
976
—
35,337
—
1,495
18,181
—
7,872
(a) The non-employee directors’ RSUs granted before 2007 are settled in TI common stock generally upon the director’s termination of
service provided he or she has served at least eight years or has reached the company’s retirement age for directors. RSUs granted
after 2006 are settled in TI common stock generally upon the fourth anniversary of the grant date.
(b) The shares in deferred compensation accounts are issued following the director’s termination of service.
(2) Included in the shares owned shown above are:
Executive Officer
Shares
Obtainable
within 60 Days
Shares
Credited to
401(k) Account
K. P. March . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. T. Crutcher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K. J. Ritchie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R. G. Delagi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
642,020
272,020
606,395
598,270
2,017
—
—
11,677
RSUs
(in Shares)
199,585
441,667
241,669
290,419
(3) Includes:
(a) 8,349,880 shares obtainable within 60 days;
(b) 35,845 shares credited to 401(k) accounts;
(c) 3,438,834 shares subject to RSU awards; for the terms of these RSUs, please see pages 66 and 85-86; and
(d) 112,720 shares credited to certain non-employee directors’ deferred compensation accounts; shares in deferred compensation
accounts are issued following a director’s termination of service.
Related person transactions
The company has no reportable related person transactions.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
Because we believe that company transactions with directors and executive officers of TI or with persons related to TI directors and
executive officers present a heightened risk of creating or appearing to create a conflict of interest, we have a written related person
transaction policy that has been approved by the board of directors. The policy states that TI directors and executive officers should
obtain the approvals specified below in connection with any related person transaction. The policy applies to transactions in which:
1. TI or any TI subsidiary is or will be a participant;
2. The amount involved exceeds or is expected to exceed $100,000 in a fiscal year; and
3. Any of the following (a “related person”) has or will have a direct or indirect interest:
(a) A TI director or executive officer, or an Immediate Family Member of a director or executive officer;
(b) A stockholder owning more than 5 percent of the common stock of TI or an Immediate Family Member of such stockholder,
or, if the 5 percent stockholder is not a natural person, any person or entity designated in the Form 13G or 13D filed under the
SEC rules and regulations by the 5 percent stockholder as having an ownership interest in TI stock (individually or collectively,
a “5 percent holder”); or
(c) An entity in which someone listed in (a) or (b) above has a 5 percent or greater ownership interest, by which someone listed
in (a) or (b) is employed, or of which someone listed in (a) or (b) is a director, principal or partner.
102 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
For purposes of the policy, an “Immediate Family Member” is any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law,
father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law or any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the
household of a TI director, executive officer or 5 percent holder.
The policy specifies that a related person transaction includes, but is not limited to, any financial transaction, arrangement or
relationship (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) or any series of similar transactions or arrangements.
The required approvals are as follows:
Arrangement involving:
Approval required by:
Executive officer who is also a member of the TI board, an Immediate
Family Member of such person, or an entity in which any of the foregoing
has a 5 percent or greater ownership interest
G&SR Committee
Chair of the G&SR Committee, chief compliance officer, any of his or her
Immediate Family Members, or an entity in which any of the foregoing has
a 5 percent or greater ownership interest
G&SR Committee
Any other director or executive officer, an Immediate Family Member of
such person, or an entity in which any of the foregoing has a 5 percent or
greater ownership interest
Chief compliance officer in consultation with the Chair of
the G&SR Committee
A 5 percent holder
G&SR Committee
No member of the G&SR Committee will participate in the consideration of a related person arrangement in which such member or any
of his or her Immediate Family Members is the related person.
The approving body or persons will consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances available to them, including (if applicable)
but not limited to: the benefits to the company of the arrangement; the impact on a director’s independence; the availability of other
sources for comparable products or services; the terms of the arrangement; and the terms available to unrelated third parties or to
employees generally. The primary consideration is whether the transaction between TI and the related person (a) was the result of
undue influence from the related person or (b) could adversely influence or appear to adversely influence the judgment, decisions or
actions of the director or executive officer in meeting TI responsibilities or create obligations to other organizations that may come in
conflict with responsibilities to TI.
No related person arrangement will be approved unless it is determined to be in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the
company and its stockholders, as the approving body or persons shall determine in good faith.
The chief compliance officer will provide periodic reports to the committee on related person transactions. Any related person
transaction brought to the attention of the chief compliance officer or of which the chief compliance officer becomes aware that is not
approved pursuant to the process set forth above shall be terminated as soon as practicable.
Compensation committee interlocks and insider participation
During 2013, Mses. Cox, Patsley and Simmons and Messrs. Sanchez and Sanders served on the Compensation Committee. No
committee member (i) was an officer or employee of TI, (ii) was formerly an officer of TI or (iii) had any relationship requiring disclosure
under the SEC’s rules governing disclosure of related person transactions (Item 404 of Regulation S-K). No executive officer of TI served
as a director or member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose directors or executive officers served as a
member of our board of directors or a member of the Compensation Committee.
Cost of solicitation
The solicitation is made on behalf of our board of directors. TI will pay the cost of soliciting these proxies. We will reimburse brokerage
houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable expenses they incur in sending these proxy materials to you if
you are a beneficial holder of our shares.
Without receiving additional compensation, officials and regular employees of TI may solicit proxies personally, by telephone, fax or
e-mail, from some stockholders if proxies are not promptly received. We have also hired Georgeson Inc. to assist in the solicitation of
proxies at a cost of $12,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 103
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT
Stockholder proposals for 2015
If you wish to submit a proposal for possible inclusion in TI’s 2015 proxy material, we must receive your notice, in accordance with
the rules of the SEC, on or before November 5, 2014. Proposals are to be sent to: Texas Instruments Incorporated, 12500 TI Boulevard,
MS 8658, Dallas, TX 75243, Attn: Secretary.
If you wish to submit a proposal at the 2015 annual meeting (but not seek inclusion of the proposal in the company’s proxy
material), we must receive your notice, in accordance with the company’s by-laws, on or before January 17, 2015.
All suggestions from stockholders concerning the company’s business are welcome and will be carefully considered by
TI’s management. To ensure that your suggestions receive appropriate review, the G&SR Committee from time to time reviews
correspondence from stockholders and management’s responses. Stockholders are thereby given access at the board level without
having to resort to formal stockholder proposals. Generally, the board prefers you present your views in this manner rather than through
the process of formal stockholder proposals. Please see page 61 for information on contacting the board.
benefit plan voting
If you are a participant in the TI Contribution and 401(k) Savings Plan, or the TI 401(k) Savings Plan, you are a “named fiduciary” under
the plans and are entitled to direct the voting of shares allocable to your accounts under these plans. The trustee administering your
plan will vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. If you wish to instruct the trustee on the voting of shares held for your
accounts, you should do so by April 14, 2014, in the manner described in the notice of annual meeting.
Additionally, participants under the plans are designated as “named fiduciaries” for the purpose of voting TI stock held under the
plans for which no voting direction is received. TI shares held by the TI 401(k) savings plans for which no voting instructions are received
by April 14, 2014, will be voted in the same proportions as the shares in the plans for which voting instructions have been received by
that date unless otherwise required by law.
Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires certain persons, including the company’s directors and executive officers, to file
reports with the SEC regarding beneficial ownership of certain equity securities of the company. Due to administrative error, there was
one late filing for Mr. Blinn with respect to his deferred compensation and one late filing for Mr. Ritchie with respect to a transfer of
shares out of his 401(k) account and a separate sale of shares. The company believes that all other reports during 2013 were timely
filed by its directors and executive officers.
Telephone and internet voting
Registered stockholders and benefit plan participants. Stockholders with shares registered directly with Computershare (TI’s transfer
agent) and participants who beneficially own shares in a TI benefit plan may vote telephonically by calling (800) 690-6903 (within the
U.S. and Canada only, toll-free) or via the Internet at www.proxyvote.com.
The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, to allow stockholders to give
their voting instructions and to confirm that stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly. TI has been advised by counsel
that the telephone and Internet voting procedures, which have been made available through Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., are
consistent with the requirements of applicable law.
Stockholders with shares registered in the name of a brokerage firm or bank. A number of brokerage firms and banks offer telephone
and Internet voting options. These programs may differ from the program provided to registered stockholders and benefit plan
participants. Check the information forwarded by your bank, broker or other holder of record to see which options are available to you.
Stockholders voting via the Internet should understand that there may be costs associated with electronic access, such as usage
charges from telephone companies and Internet access providers, that must be borne by the stockholder.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
104 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Stockholders sharing the same address
To reduce the expenses of delivering duplicate materials, we take advantage of the SEC’s “householding” rules which permit us
to deliver only one set of proxy materials (or one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials) to stockholders who share an
address unless otherwise requested. If you share an address with another stockholder and have received only one set of these
materials, you may request a separate copy at no cost to you by calling Investor Relations at 214-479-3773 or by writing to Texas
Instruments Incorporated, P.O. Box 660199, MS 8657, Dallas, TX 75266-0199, Attn: Investor Relations. For future annual meetings,
you may request separate materials, or request that we send only one set of materials to you if you are receiving multiple copies, by
calling (800) 542-1061 or writing to Investor Relations at the address given above.
Electronic delivery of proxy materials
As an alternative to receiving printed copies of these materials in future years, we are pleased to offer stockholders the opportunity
to receive proxy mailings electronically. To request electronic delivery, please vote via the Internet at www.proxyvote.com and, when
prompted, enroll to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. After the meeting date, stockholders holding
shares through a broker or bank may request electronic delivery by visiting www.icsdelivery.com/ti and entering information for
each account held by a bank or broker. If you are a registered stockholder and would like to request electronic delivery, please visit
www-us.computershare.com/investor or call TI Investor Relations at 214-479-3773 for more information. If you are a participant in a
TI benefit plan and would like to request electronic delivery, please call TI Investor Relations for more information.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be held on April 17, 2014. This
2014 proxy statement and the company’s 2013 annual report are accessible at: www.proxyvote.com.
Sincerely,
Joseph F. Hubach
Senior Vice President,
Secretary and General Counsel
March 4, 2014
Dallas, Texas
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • 105
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT directions and other annual meeting information
Directions
From DFW airport: Take the North Airport exit to IH-635E. Take IH-635E to the Greenville Avenue exit. Turn right (South) on Greenville.
Turn right (West) on Forest Lane. Texas Instruments will be on your right at the second traffic light. Please use the North entrance to
the building.
From Love Field airport: Take Mockingbird Lane East to US-75N (Central Expressway). Travel North on 75N to the Forest Lane exit. Turn
right (East) on Forest Lane. You will pass two traffic lights. At the third light, the entrance to Texas Instruments will be on your left. Please
use the North entrance to the building.
Parking
There will be reserved parking for all visitors at the North Lobby. Visitors with special needs requiring assistance will be accommodated
at the South Lobby entrance.
Security
Please be advised that TI’s security policy forbids weapons, cameras and audio/video recording devices inside TI buildings. All bags will
be subject to search upon entry into the building.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
106 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
EXHIBIT A
TI EMPLOYEES 2014 STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
Dated April 17, 2014
The TI Employees 2014 Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) is designed to encourage in all Employees a proprietary interest in the
Company. The Plan provides for all eligible Employees the option to purchase shares of the common stock of TI through voluntary
systematic payroll deductions. The options provided to participants under the Plan shall be in addition to regular salary, profit sharing,
pension, life insurance, special payments or other benefits related to a participant’s employment with the Company. It is the intention of
the Company to have the Plan qualify as an “Employee Stock Purchase Plan” pursuant to Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, and regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Code”), but the Company does not undertake to maintain such status
through the Plan term. If such status is not maintained, any award under the Plan will be made in a manner that is intended to avoid the
imposition of additional taxes and penalties under Section 409A of the Code.
For the purposes of the Plan unless otherwise indicated, “TI” shall mean Texas Instruments Incorporated, “Subsidiary” shall mean
a corporation where at least eighty percent of its voting stock is owned directly or indirectly by TI, “Company” shall mean TI and its
Subsidiaries, “Employee” shall mean an individual who is a full-time or part-time employee of the Company (including employees on
paid or unpaid leave of absence if TI expects that they will return to work), and “Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of TI.
Eligibility
All Employees of TI, and such of its Subsidiaries as the Committee described below shall from time to time designate, who are
Employees on the date of grant of the option shall be eligible to participate in offerings of options under the Plan, except the Committee
may, in specified offerings, exclude Employees that fall into an excludable category as described in Section 423 of the Code and the
regulations thereunder. The categories of Employees excluded from any specified offering may differ from the categories of Employees
excluded from other offerings. For each offering, the date of grant shall be as determined by the Committee. Directors who are not
Employees are not eligible to participate in the Plan.
Administration of plan
The Plan shall be administered by a Committee of the Board which shall be known as the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”).
The Committee shall be appointed by a majority of the whole Board and shall consist of not less than three directors. The Board may
designate one or more directors as alternate members of the Committee, who may replace any absent or disqualified member at any
meeting of the Committee. The Committee shall have full power and authority to construe, interpret and administer the Plan. It may
issue rules and regulations for administration of the Plan. It shall meet at such times and places as it may determine. A majority of the
members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum and all decisions of the Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding upon all
parties, including the Company, the stockholders and employees.
The Committee shall have the full and exclusive right to establish the terms of each offering of common stock of TI under the
Plan except as otherwise expressly provided in this Plan. The terms of each offering, as established by the Committee, shall be
communicated to eligible Employees in writing or electronically. The Committee may delegate such power, authority and rights with
respect to the administration of the Plan (including, without limitation, the designation of Subsidiaries whose Employees may participate
in offerings and the exclusion of Employees from specified offerings, in each case to the extent permitted by Section 423 of the Code)
as it deems appropriate to one or more members of the management of TI (including, without limitation, a committee of one or more
members of management appointed by the Committee); provided, however, that any delegation to management shall conform with the
requirements of applicable law and stock exchange regulations. The Committee may also recommend to the Board revisions of the Plan.
Expenses of administration
Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, any broker commissions, fees or other expenses incurred in connection with the
exercise of an option hereunder or as a result of the opening or maintenance of accounts for Employees and the purchase and sale
of common stock of TI on behalf of Employees shall be paid by the Employee who incurs the expenses and any other expenses of the
administration of the Plan shall be borne by TI.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • A-1
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT Amendments
The Committee may, at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, suspend or terminate the Plan, any part thereof or any option
thereunder as it may deem proper and in the best interests of the Company, provided, however, that unless the stockholders of TI shall
have first approved thereof, (i) the total number of shares for which options may be exercised under the Plan shall not be increased or
decreased, except as adjusted below under “Adjustments,” and (ii) no amendment shall be made which shall allow an option price for
offerings under the Plan to be less than 85% of the fair market value of the common stock of TI on the date of grant of the options or
85% of the fair market value of the common stock of TI on the date on which an option is exercised, if lower.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may adopt and amend stock purchase sub-plans with respect to Employees of
Subsidiaries with such provisions as the Committee may deem appropriate to conform with local laws, practices and procedures, and
to permit exclusion of certain Employees from participation. All such sub-plans shall be subject to the limitations on the amount of
stock that may be issued under the Plan and, except to the extent otherwise provided in such plans, shall be subject to all of the other
provisions set forth herein.
Offerings
Each year during the term of the Plan, unless the Committee determines otherwise, TI will make one or more offerings in which
options to purchase TI common stock will be granted under the Plan. The offerings made to Employees of TI and to the Employees
of each participating Subsidiary shall constitute separate offerings (i.e., the offering made to Employees of one participating entity
shall be separate from the offering made to Employees of another participating entity) for purposes of Section 423 of the Code and
the regulations thereunder and, accordingly, may contain different terms and conditions, provided that each such offering meets the
requirements of Section 423 and the regulations thereunder.
Limitations on grants
No more than 40,000,000 shares of TI common stock may be sold pursuant to options granted under the Plan, subject to adjustments
as described below. Either authorized and unissued shares or issued shares heretofore or hereafter acquired by TI may be made subject
to option under the Plan. If for any reason any option under the Plan terminates in whole or in part, shares subject to such terminated
option may be again subjected to an option under the Plan.
Adjustments
In the event that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, shares, other securities, or other property),
recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase
or exchange of shares or other securities of TI, issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase shares or other securities of TI, or
other similar corporate transaction or event affects the shares such that an adjustment is appropriate in order to prevent dilution or
enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan, then the Committee shall equitably
adjust any or all of (i) the number and type of shares which may be made the subject of options, (ii) the number and type of shares
subject to outstanding options, and (iii) the grant, purchase or exercise price with respect to any option or, if deemed appropriate, make
provision for a cash payment to the holder of an option. However, any adjustment that results in an increase in the aggregate number of
shares that may be issued under the Plan (other than an increase merely reflecting a change in the number of outstanding shares, such
as a stock dividend or stock split) will be considered the adoption of a new plan that would require stockholder approval, to the extent
required by Section 423 of the Code and the regulations thereunder.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
Terms and conditions of options
Each offering shall be subject to the following terms and conditions, and to such further terms and conditions as may be established by
the Committee as described in the paragraph above entitled “Administration of Plan.” To the extent required by Section 423 of the Code
and the regulations thereunder, all Employees granted options in an offering shall have equal rights and privileges.
(1) An option price per share for each offering shall be determined by the Committee on or prior to the date of grant of the option
which shall in no instance be less than (a) 85% of the fair market value of TI common stock on the date the option is granted, or
(b) 85% of the fair market value of TI common stock on the date the option is exercised, whichever is lower. The fair market value
on the date on which an option is granted or exercised shall be determined by such methods or procedures as shall be established
by the Committee prior to or on the date of grant of the option.
A-2 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
(2) The expiration date of the options granted in each offering shall be determined by the Committee prior to or on the date of grant of
the options but in any event shall not be more than 27 months after the date of grant of the options.
(3) Each option shall entitle the Employee to purchase up to that number of shares which could be purchased at the option price as the
Committee shall determine for each offering (but not to exceed the amount specified in Section 423(b) of the Code). Alternatively, or
in combination with setting a maximum number of shares, the Committee may choose to determine a maximum dollar amount that
could be used to purchase shares for each offering (but not to exceed the amount specified in Section 423(b) of the Code). Each
Employee may elect to participate for less than the maximum number of shares or dollar amount specified by the Committee. The
Committee shall determine prior to or on the date of grant of the options the consequences of an Employee’s election to participate
for less than the maximum and whether the Employee shall be entitled to purchase fractional shares.
(4) The term of each offering shall consist of the following three periods:
(a) an Enrollment Period during which each eligible Employee shall determine whether or not and to what extent to participate by
authorizing payroll deductions;
(b) a Payroll Deduction Period during which (subject to paragraph (15) below) payroll deductions shall be made and credited to
each Employee’s payroll deduction account; and
(c) an Exercise Day on which options of participating Employees will be automatically exercised in full.
The beginning and ending dates of each Enrollment Period and Payroll Deduction Period and the date of each Exercise Day shall be
determined by the Committee.
(5) Each eligible Employee who desires to participate in an offering shall elect to do so by completing and delivering by the end of
the Enrollment Period to a person or firm designated by the Treasurer of TI a payroll deduction authorization in the form (including
without limitation, telephonic and electronic transmission, utilization of voice response systems and computer entry) prescribed
by the Committee authorizing payroll deductions during the Payroll Deduction Period. Where local law prohibits payroll deductions,
paragraph (15) shall apply. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, such election and payroll deduction authorization shall
constitute an election and payroll deduction authorization to participate in the current offering, and the Employee may elect to be
automatically re-enrolled in subsequent offerings under the Plan.
(6) TI shall maintain or arrange for the maintenance of payroll deduction accounts for all participating Employees (or alternative
payment method pursuant to paragraph (15)).
(7) On the Exercise Day, the options of each participating Employee to which such Exercise Day relates shall be automatically exercised
in full without the need for the participating Employee to take any action.
(8) Upon exercise of an option, the shares shall be paid for in full by transfer of the purchase price from the Employee’s payroll
deduction account, if any, to the account of TI, and any balance in the Employee’s payroll deduction account shall be paid to the
Employee in cash.
(9) The Committee may allow participating Employees to cancel or reduce, or both, their payroll deduction authorizations. The
Committee shall determine the consequences of such cancellations or reductions on the participating Employees’ enrollment in
subsequent offerings.
(10) The Committee shall determine on or prior to the date of grant of options the consequences of the termination of employment of a
participating Employee for any reason, including death, during the term of an offering.
(11) An Employee will have none of the rights and privileges of a stockholder of TI with respect to the shares of common stock subject
to an option under the Plan until such shares of common stock have been transferred or issued to the Employee or to a designated
broker for the Employee’s account on the books of TI.
(12) An option granted under the Plan may not be transferred except by will or the laws of descent and distribution and, during the
lifetime of the Employee to whom granted, may be exercised only by the Employee.
(13) Each option granted shall be evidenced by an instrument in such written or electronic form as the Committee shall approve which
shall be dated the date of grant and shall comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
(14) No Employee shall be granted an option hereunder if such Employee, immediately after the option is granted, owns stock
possessing five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of TI or a related
corporation as defined in Treas. Reg. Section 1.421-1(i) (“Related Corporation”), computed in accordance with Section 423(b)(3)
of the Code. No Employee shall be granted an option that permits the Employee’s rights to purchase common stock under all
employee stock purchase plans of TI or a Related Corporation to accrue at a rate which exceeds $25,000 (or such other maximum
as may be prescribed from time to time by the Code) of fair market value of such common stock (determined at the date of grant)
for each calendar year in which such option is outstanding at any time in accordance with the provisions of Section 423(b)(8) of
the Code.
(15) If local law prohibits payroll deductions for some or all Employees who are eligible for an offering, all Employees who are eligible for
the offering in that location may authorize their employer to place the funds that otherwise would be subject to payroll deductions
into bank accounts or in accounts with a trustee or other custodian in the names of the Employees or in the name of the employer
or pay the funds by such other method authorized by the Committee. In such event, all of the provisions of the Plan applicable to
payroll deductions shall apply to such accounts.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • A-3
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT
Plan funds
All amounts held by TI in payroll deduction accounts under the Plan may be used for any corporate purpose of TI.
Governmental and stock exchange regulations
The obligation of TI to sell and deliver common stock under the Plan is subject to applicable laws and to the approval of any
governmental authority required in connection with the authorization, issuance, sale or delivery of such common stock. The Company
may, without liability to participating Employees, defer or cancel delivery of shares or take other action it deems appropriate in cases
where applicable laws, regulations or stock exchange rules impose constraints on the normal Plan operations or delivery of shares.
Such actions shall be taken in a manner which provides equal rights and privileges to all Employees granted options in an offering.
Termination of plan
No offering shall be made hereunder after April 17, 2024. Further, no offering hereunder shall be made after any day upon which
participating Employees elect to participate for a number of shares equal to or greater than the number of shares remaining available
for purchase. If the number of shares for which Employees elect to participate shall be greater than the shares remaining available, the
available shares shall at the end of the Enrollment Period be allocated among such participating Employees pro rata on the basis of the
number of shares for which each has elected to participate.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
A-4 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
EXHIBIT B
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS 2009 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
As amended January 19, 2012
SECTION 1. Purpose.
The Texas Instruments 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan is intended as a successor plan to the Company’s 2000 Long-Term Incentive
Plan, 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the predecessors thereto. This Plan is designed to enhance the ability of the Company
to attract and retain exceptionally qualified individuals and to encourage them to acquire a proprietary interest in the growth and
performance of the Company.
SECTION 2. Definitions.
As used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth in this Section 2. Any definition of a performance measure
used in connection with an Award described by Section 11(f) shall have the meaning commonly ascribed to such term by generally
acceptable accounting principles as practiced in the United States.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
“Affiliate” shall mean (i) any entity that, directly or indirectly, is controlled by the Company and (ii) any entity in which the
Company has a significant equity interest, in either case as determined by the Committee.
“Award” shall mean any Option, award of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, Performance Unit or Other Stock-Based
Award granted under the Plan.
“Award Agreement” shall mean any written agreement, contract or other instrument or document evidencing an Award
granted under the Plan, which may, but need not, be executed or acknowledged by a Participant. An Award Agreement may be
in electronic form.
“Board” shall mean the board of directors of the Company.
“Cash Flow” for a period shall mean net cash provided by operating activities.
“Change in Control” shall mean an event that will be deemed to have occurred:
(i) On the date any Person, other than (1) the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, (2) a trustee or other fiduciary holding
stock under an employee benefit plan of the Company or any of its Affiliates, (3) an underwriter temporarily holding stock
pursuant to an offering of such stock, or (4) a corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company
in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company, acquires ownership of stock of the
Company that, together with stock held by such Person, constitutes more than 50 percent of the total fair market value or
total voting power of the stock of the Company. However, if any Person is considered to own more than 50 percent of the
total fair market value or total voting power of the stock of the Company, the acquisition of additional stock by the same
Person is not considered to be a Change in Control;
(ii) On the date a majority of members of the Board is replaced during any 12-month period by directors whose appointment
or election is not endorsed by a majority of the Board before the date of the appointment or election; or
(iii) On the date any Person acquires (or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent
acquisition by such Person) assets from the Company that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than
80 percent of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of the Company immediately before such acquisition or
acquisitions. For this purpose, gross fair market value means the value of the assets of the Company or the value of the
assets being disposed of, determined without regard to any liabilities associated with such assets. However, there is no
Change in Control when there is such a sale or transfer to (i) a stockholder of the Company (immediately before the asset
transfer) in exchange for or with respect to the Company’s then outstanding stock; (ii) an entity, at least 50 percent of the
total value or voting power of the stock of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company; (iii) a Person that owns,
directly or indirectly, at least 50 percent of the total value or voting power of the outstanding stock of the Company; or
(iv) an entity, at least 50 percent of the total value or voting power of the stock of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by
a Person that owns, directly or indirectly, at least 50 percent of the total value or voting power of the outstanding stock of
the Company.
(iv) For purposes of (i), (ii) and (iii) of this Section 2(f),
(A) “Affiliate” shall have the meaning set forth in Rule 12b-2 promulgated under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended;
(B) “Person” shall have the meaning given in Section 7701(a)(1) of the Code. Person shall include more than one Person
acting as a group as defined by the Final Treasury Regulations issued under Section 409A of the Code; and
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • B-1
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT (C) “Subsidiary” means any entity whose assets and net income are included in the consolidated financial statements
of the Company audited by the Company’s independent auditors and reported to stockholders in the annual report
to stockholders.
(v) Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no case will an event in (i), (ii) or (iii) of this Section 2(f) be treated as a Change in
Control unless such event also constitutes a “change in control event” with respect to the Company within the meaning of
Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-3(i)(5) or any successor provision.
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
“Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
“Committee” shall mean a committee of the Board designated by the Board to administer the Plan. Unless otherwise
determined by the Board, the Compensation Committee designated by the Board shall be the Committee under the Plan.
“Company” shall mean Texas Instruments Incorporated, together with any successor thereto.
“Cycle Time” shall mean the actual time a specific process relating to a product or service of the Company takes
to accomplish.
“Earnings Before Income Taxes” shall mean income from continuing operations plus provision for income taxes.
“Earnings Before Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization” or “EBITDA” shall mean income from continuing operations
plus 1) provision for income taxes, 2) depreciation expense and 3) amortization expense.
(m) “Earnings Per Share” for a period shall mean diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations before
(n)
(o)
(p)
(q)
(r)
(s)
(t)
(u)
(v)
(w)
(x)
extraordinary items.
“Executive Group” shall mean every person who is expected by the Committee to be both (i) a “covered employee” as defined
in Section 162(m) of the Code as of the end of the taxable year in which an amount related to or arising in connection with
the Award may be deducted by the Company, and (ii) the recipient of taxable compensation of more than $1,000,000 for that
taxable year.
“Fair Market Value” shall mean, with respect to any property (including, without limitation, any Shares or other securities), the
fair market value of such property determined by such methods or procedures as shall be established from time to time by
the Committee.
“Free Cash Flow” for a period shall mean net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations less additions to
property, plant and equipment.
“Gross Profit” for a period shall mean net revenue less cost of revenue.
“Gross Profit Margin” for a period shall mean Gross Profit divided by net revenue.
“Incentive Stock Option” shall mean an option granted under Section 6 that is intended to meet the requirements of
Section 422 of the Code, or any successor provision thereto.
“Involuntary Termination” shall mean a Termination of Employment, other than for cause, due to the independent exercise of
unilateral authority of TI to terminate the Participant’s services, other than due to the Participant’s implicit or explicit request,
where the Participant was willing and able to continue to perform services, in accordance with Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(n)(1) or
any successor provision.
“Manufacturing Process Yield” shall mean the good units produced as a percent of the total units processed.
“Market Share” shall mean the percent of sales of the total available market in an industry, product line or product attained by
the Company or one or more of its business units, product lines or products during a time period.
“Net Revenue Per Employee” in a period shall mean net revenue divided by the average number of employees, with average
defined as the sum of the number of employees at the beginning and ending of the period divided by two.
“Non-Qualified Stock Option” shall mean an option granted under Section 6 that is not intended to be an Incentive
Stock Option.
“Option” shall mean an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock Option.
“Other Stock-Based Award” shall mean any right granted under Section 10.
(y)
(z)
(aa) “Participant” shall mean an individual granted an Award under the Plan.
(bb) “Performance Unit” shall mean any right granted under Section 8.
(cc) “Plan” shall mean this Texas Instruments 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(dd) “Operating Profit” shall mean revenue less (i) cost of revenue, (ii) research and development expense and (iii) selling, general
and administrative expense.
(ee) “Restricted Stock” shall mean any Share granted under Section 7.
(ff)
“Restricted Stock Unit” shall mean a contractual right granted under Section 7 that is denominated in Shares, each of which
represents a right to receive the value of a Share (or a percentage of such value, which percentage may be higher than 100%)
on the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement.
(gg) “Return on Assets” for a period shall mean net income divided by average total assets, with average defined as the sum of the
amount of assets at the beginning and ending of the period divided by two.
(hh) “Return on Capital” for a period shall mean net income divided by stockholders’ equity.
(ii)
“Return on Common Equity” for a period shall mean net income divided by total stockholders’ equity, less amounts, if any,
attributable to preferred stock.
B-2 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
(jj)
“Return on Invested Capital” for a period shall mean net income divided by the sum of stockholders’ equity and long-
term debt.
(kk) “Return on Net Assets” for a period shall mean net income divided by the difference of average total assets less average
non-debt liabilities, with average defined as the sum of assets or liabilities at the beginning and ending of the period divided
by two.
“Revenue Growth” shall mean the percentage change in revenue from one period to another.
(ll)
(mm) “Shares” shall mean shares of the common stock of the Company, $1.00 par value.
(nn) “Specified Employee” shall mean an employee who is a “specified employee” (as defined in Section 409A(2)(b)(i) of the
Code) for the applicable period, as determined by the Committee in accordance with Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(i) or any
successor provision.
(oo) “Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” shall mean any right granted pursuant to Section 9 to receive, upon exercise by the
Participant, the excess of (i) the Fair Market Value of one Share on the date of exercise or any date or dates during a specified
period before the date of exercise over (ii) the grant price of the right, which grant price, except in the case of Substitute
Awards, shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of one Share on the date of grant of the right.
(pp) “Substitute Awards” shall mean Awards granted in assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted
by a company acquired by the Company or with which the Company combines.
(qq) “Termination of Employment” shall mean the date on which the Participant has incurred a “separation from service” within the
meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(h) or any successor provision.
“TI” shall mean and include the Company and its Affiliates.
(rr)
(ss) “Total Stockholder Return” shall mean the sum of the appreciation in stock price and dividends paid on common stock over a
given period of time.
SECTION 3. Eligibility.
(a) Any individual who is employed by the Company or any Affiliate, and any individual who provides services to the Company or any
Affiliate as an independent contractor, including any officer or employee-director, shall be eligible to be selected to receive an
Award under the Plan.
(b) An individual who has agreed to accept employment by, or to provide services to, the Company or an Affiliate shall be deemed to
be eligible for Awards hereunder as of commencement of employment.
(c) Directors who are not full-time or part-time officers or employees are not eligible to receive Awards hereunder.
(d) Holders of options and other types of Awards granted by a company acquired by the Company or with which the Company
combines are eligible for grant of Substitute Awards hereunder.
SECTION 4. Administration.
(a) The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall be appointed by the Board. A director may serve as a
member or alternate member of the Committee only during periods in which the director is (i) independent within the meaning
of the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market and the Company’s director independence standards and (ii) an “outside director” as
described in Section 162(m) of the Code.
(b) Subject to the terms of the Plan and applicable law, the Committee shall have full power and authority to: (i) designate
Participants; (ii) determine the type or types of Awards (including Substitute Awards) to be granted to each Participant under the
Plan; (iii) determine the number of Shares to be covered by (or with respect to which payments, rights, or other matters are to
be calculated in connection with) Awards; (iv) determine the terms and conditions of any Award (v) determine whether, to what
extent, and under what circumstances Awards may be settled or exercised in cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards, or
other property, or canceled, forfeited or suspended, and the method or methods by which Awards may be settled, exercised,
canceled, forfeited or suspended; (vi) determine, consistent with Section 11(g), whether, to what extent, and under what
circumstances cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards, other property, and other amounts payable with respect to an Award
under the Plan shall be deferred either automatically or at the election of the holder thereof or of the Committee; (vii) interpret
and administer the Plan and any instrument or agreement relating to, or Award made under, the Plan; (viii) establish, amend,
suspend or waive such rules and regulations and appoint such agents as it shall deem appropriate for the proper administration
of the Plan, including adopting sub-plans and addenda for Participants outside the United States to achieve favorable tax results
or facilitate compliance with applicable laws; (ix) determine whether and to what extent Awards should comply or continue to
comply with any requirement of statute or regulation; and (x) make any other determination and take any other action that the
Committee deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan.
(c) All decisions of the Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding upon all parties, including the Company, the stockholders
and the Participants.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • B-3
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT SECTION 5. Shares Available for Awards.
(a) Subject to adjustment as provided in this Section 5, the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan shall be
75,000,000 shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing and subject to adjustment as provided in Section 5(e), no Participant may
receive Options and SARs under the Plan in any calendar year that relate to more than 4,000,000 Shares.
(b) If, after the effective date of the Plan, (i) any Shares covered by an Award, or to which such an Award relates, are forfeited or
(ii) any Award expires or is cancelled or otherwise terminated, then the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan
shall increase, to the extent of any such forfeiture, expiration, cancellation or termination. For purposes of this Section 5(b)
awards and options granted under any previous option or long-term incentive plan of the Company (other than a Substitute
Award granted under any such plan) shall be treated as Awards. For the avoidance of doubt, the number of Shares available
for issuance under the Plan shall not be increased by: (i) the withholding of Shares as a result of the net settlement of an
outstanding Option or SAR; (ii) the delivery of Shares to pay the exercise price or withholding taxes relating to an Award; or
(iii) the repurchase of Shares on the open market using the proceeds of an Option’s exercise.
(c) Any Shares underlying Substitute Awards shall not be counted against the Shares available for granting Awards.
(d) Any Shares delivered pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued Shares, of treasury
Shares or of both.
(e) In the event that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Shares, other securities, or other property),
recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase
or exchange of Shares or other securities of the Company, issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase Shares or other
securities of the Company, or other similar corporate transaction or event affects the Shares such that an adjustment is
appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under
the Plan, then the Committee shall equitably adjust any or all of (i) the number and type of Shares (or other securities or property)
which thereafter may be made the subject of Awards, including the aggregate and individual limits specified in Section 5(a),
(ii) the number and type of Shares (or other securities, cash or property) subject to outstanding Awards, and (iii) the grant,
purchase, or exercise price with respect to any Award or, if deemed appropriate, make provision for a cash payment to the
holder of an outstanding Award; provided, however, that the number of Shares subject to any Award denominated in Shares shall
always be a whole number. Any such adjustment with respect to a “stock right” outstanding under the Plan, as defined in Section
409A of the Code, shall be made in a manner that is intended to avoid the imposition of any additional tax or penalty under
Section 409A.
SECTION 6. Options.
(a) The Committee is hereby authorized to grant Options to Participants with the terms and conditions described in this Section 6
and with such additional terms and conditions, in either case not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as the Committee
shall determine.
(b) The purchase price per Share under an Option shall be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that, except in the
case of Substitute Awards, such purchase price shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant of
such Option.
(c) The term of each Option shall be fixed by the Committee but shall not exceed 10 years; provided, however, that the Committee
may provide for a longer term to accommodate regulations in non-U.S. jurisdictions that require a minimum exercise or vesting
period following a Participant’s death to achieve favorable tax results or comply with local law.
(d) The Committee shall determine the time or times at which an Option may be exercised in whole or in part, and the method or
methods by which, and the form or forms (including, without limitation, cash, Shares, other Awards, or other property, or any
combination thereof, having a Fair Market Value on the exercise date equal to the relevant exercise price) in which, payment of
the exercise price with respect thereto may be made or deemed to have been made.
(e) The terms of any Incentive Stock Option granted under the Plan shall comply in all respects with the provisions of Section 422
of the Code, or any successor provision thereto, and any regulations promulgated thereunder, but the Company makes no
representation that any options will qualify, or continue to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option and makes no covenant to
maintain Incentive Stock Option status.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
B-4 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
SECTION 7. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units.
(a) The Committee is hereby authorized to grant Awards of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units to Participants with the terms
and conditions described in this Section 7 and with such additional terms and conditions, in either case not inconsistent with the
provisions of the Plan, as the Committee shall determine.
(b) Shares of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to such restrictions as the Committee may impose
(including, without limitation, any limitation on the right to vote a Share of Restricted Stock or the right to receive any dividend or
other right or property), which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such time or times, in such installments or
otherwise, as the Committee may deem appropriate.
(c) Any share of Restricted Stock granted under the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Committee may deem
appropriate including, without limitation, book-entry registration or issuance of a stock certificate or certificates. In the event any
stock certificate is issued in respect of shares of Restricted Stock granted under the Plan, such certificate shall be registered in
the name of the Participant and shall bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to
such Restricted Stock.
(d) Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, upon termination of employment or cessation of the provision of services
(as determined under criteria established by the Committee) for any reason during the applicable restriction period, all Shares of
Restricted Stock and all Restricted Stock Units still, in either case, subject to restriction shall be forfeited and reacquired by the
Company; provided, however, that the Committee may, when it finds that a waiver would be in the best interests of the Company,
waive in whole or in part any or all remaining restrictions with respect to Shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units.
SECTION 8. Performance Units.
(a) The Committee is hereby authorized to grant Performance Units to Participants with terms and conditions as the Committee shall
determine not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan.
(b) Subject to the terms of the Plan, a Performance Unit granted under the Plan (i) may be denominated or payable in cash, Shares
(including, without limitation, Restricted Stock), other securities, other Awards, or other property and (ii) shall confer on the holder
thereof rights valued as determined by the Committee and payable to, or exercisable by, the holder of the Performance Unit, in
whole or in part, upon the achievement of such performance goals during such performance periods as the Committee shall
establish. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the performance goals to be achieved during any performance period, the length of
any performance period, the amount of any Performance Unit granted and the amount of any payment or transfer to be made
pursuant to any Performance Unit shall be determined by the Committee.
SECTION 9. Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs).
(a) The Committee is hereby authorized to grant SARs to Participants with terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine
not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan.
(b) The term of each SAR shall be fixed by the Committee but shall not exceed 10 years; provided, however, that the Committee may
provide for a longer term to accommodate regulations in non-U.S. jurisdictions that require a minimum exercise or vesting period
following a Participant’s death.
SECTION 10. Other Stock-based Awards.
The Committee is hereby authorized to grant to Participants such other Awards that are denominated or payable in, valued in whole
or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to, Shares (including, without limitation, securities convertible into Shares)
as are deemed by the Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee
shall determine the terms and conditions of such Awards. Shares or other securities delivered pursuant to a purchase right granted
under this Section 10 shall be purchased for such consideration, which may be paid by such method or methods and in such form or
forms, including, without limitation, cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards, or other property, or any combination thereof, as the
Committee shall determine, the value of which consideration, as established by the Committee, shall, except in the case of Substitute
Awards, not be less than the Fair Market Value of such Shares or other securities as of the date such purchase right is granted.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • B-5
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT SECTION 11. General Provisions Applicable to Awards.
(a) Awards shall be granted for no cash consideration or for such minimal cash consideration as may be required by applicable law.
(b) Awards may, in the discretion of the Committee, be granted either alone or in addition to or in tandem with any other Award or
any award granted under any other plan of the Company. Awards granted in addition to or in tandem with other Awards, or in
addition to or in tandem with awards granted under any other plan of the Company, may be granted either at the same time as or
at a different time from the grant of such other Awards or awards.
(c) Subject to the terms of the Plan, payments or transfers to be made by the Company upon the grant, exercise or settlement of
an Award may be made in such form or forms as the Committee shall determine including, without limitation, cash, Shares,
other securities, other Awards, or other property, or any combination thereof, and may be made in a single payment or transfer,
in installments, or on a deferred basis, in each case in accordance with Section 11(g) and rules and procedures established by
the Committee. Such rules and procedures may include, without limitation, provisions for the payment or crediting of reasonable
interest on installment or deferred payments or, with respect only to Awards other than Options and SARs, the grant or crediting
of dividend equivalents in respect of installment or deferred payments.
(d) Unless the Committee shall otherwise determine, (i) no Award, and no right under any such Award, shall be assignable, alienable,
saleable or transferable by a Participant otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution; provided, however,
that, if so determined by the Committee, a Participant may, in the manner established by the Committee, designate a beneficiary
or beneficiaries to exercise the rights of the Participant, and to receive any property distributable, with respect to any Award
upon the death of the Participant; (ii) each Award, and each right under any Award, shall be exercisable during the Participant’s
lifetime only by the Participant or, if permissible under applicable law, by the Participant’s guardian or legal representative;
and (iii) no Award, and no right under any such Award, may be pledged, alienated, attached, or otherwise encumbered, and any
purported pledge, alienation, attachment or encumbrance thereof shall be void and unenforceable against the Company. The
provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to any Award which has been fully exercised, earned or paid, as the case may be,
and shall not preclude forfeiture of an Award in accordance with the terms thereof.
(e) All certificates for Shares or other securities delivered under the Plan pursuant to any Award or the exercise thereof shall be
subject to such stop transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the Plan or the rules,
regulations, and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any stock exchange upon which such Shares
or other securities are then listed, and any applicable Federal, state or foreign securities laws, and the Committee may cause a
legend or legends to be put on any such certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.
(f) Every Award (other than an Option or SAR) to a member of the Executive Group that the Committee intends to constitute
“qualified performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code shall include a pre-established
formula, such that payment, retention or vesting of the Award is subject to the achievement during a performance period
or periods, as determined by the Committee, of a level or levels, on an absolute basis or relative to other companies, as
determined by the Committee, of one or more of the following performance measures: (i) Cash Flow, (ii) Cycle Time, (iii) Earnings
Before Income Taxes, (iv) Earnings Per Share, (v) EBITDA, (vi) Free Cash Flow, (vii) Gross Profit, (viii) Gross Profit Margin,
(ix) Manufacturing Process Yield, (x) Market Share, (xi) net income, (xii) Net Revenue Per Employee, (xiii) Operating Profit,
(xiv) Return on Assets, (xv) Return on Capital, (xvi) Return on Common Equity, (xvii) Return on Invested Capital, (xviii) Return on
Net Assets, (xix) Revenue Growth or (xx) Total Stockholder Return. For any Award subject to any such pre-established formula, no
more than $5,000,000 can be paid in satisfaction of such Award to any Participant, provided, however, that if the performance
formula relating to such Award is expressed in Shares, the maximum limit shall be 4,000,000 Shares in lieu of such dollar limit.
(g) Unless the Committee expressly determines otherwise in the Award Agreement, any Award of an Option, SAR, or Restricted Stock
is intended to qualify as a stock right exempt under Section 409A of the Code, and the terms of the Award Agreement and any
related rules and procedures adopted by the Committee shall reflect such intention. Unless the Committee expressly determines
otherwise in the Award Agreement, with respect to any other Award that would constitute deferred compensation within the
meaning of Section 409A of the Code, the Award Agreement shall set forth the time and form of payment and the election rights,
if any, of the holder in a manner that is intended to avoid the imposition of additional taxes and penalties under Section 409A.
The Company makes no representation or covenant that any Award granted under the Plan will comply with Section 409A.
(h) The Committee shall not have the authority to provide in any Award granted hereunder for the automatic award of an Option
upon the exercise or settlement of such Award.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
B-6 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
(i) This Section 11(i) applies with respect to Awards granted on or after January 1, 2010. If a Participant experiences an Involuntary
Termination within 24 months after a Change in Control, then unless specifically provided to the contrary in any Award
Agreement or the Committee otherwise determines under authority granted elsewhere in the Plan,
(1) Awards held by the Participant shall become fully vested and exercisable, and any restrictions applicable to the Awards shall
lapse, upon the effective date of such termination;
(2) to the extent permitted without additional tax or penalty by Section 409A of the Code, the shares underlying Restricted Stock
Units, Performance Units or other Stock-Based Awards held by the Participant will be issued on, or as soon as practicable (but
no later than 60 days) after, the Participant’s Involuntary Termination, provided, however, that if the Participant is a Specified
Employee upon such termination, the shares will be issued on, or as soon as practicable (but no more than 10 days) after, the
first day of the seventh month following such Involuntary Termination; and
(3) to the extent that the issuance of shares as specified in (2) above is not permitted without additional tax or penalty by
Section 409A, the Award will continue to full term and the shares will be issued at the issuance date specified in the Award
Agreement as if the Participant were still an employee of TI on such date.
SECTION 12. Amendment and Termination.
(a) Unless otherwise expressly provided in an Award Agreement or in the Plan, the Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue,
or terminate the Plan or any portion thereof at any time; provided, however, that no such amendment, alteration, suspension,
discontinuation or termination shall be made without (i) stockholder approval if such approval is necessary to comply with the
listing requirements of The NASDAQ Stock Market or (ii) the consent of the affected Participants, if such action would adversely
affect the rights of such Participants under any outstanding Award. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the
Committee may amend the Plan in such manner as may be necessary to enable the Plan to achieve its stated purposes in any
jurisdiction outside the United States in a tax-efficient manner and in compliance with local rules and regulations.
(b) The Committee may waive any conditions or rights under, or amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate, any Award
theretofore granted, prospectively or retroactively, without the consent of any relevant Participant or holder or beneficiary of
an Award, provided, however, that (i) no such action shall impair the rights of any affected Participant or holder or beneficiary
under any Award theretofore granted under the Plan; (ii) except as provided in Section 5(e), no such action shall reduce the
exercise price of any Option or SAR established at the time of grant thereof; and (iii) except in connection with a corporate
transaction involving the Company (including an event described in Section 5(e)), an Option or SAR may not be terminated in
exchange for (x) a cash amount greater than the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares on the date of
cancellation over the exercise price times the number of Shares outstanding under the Award (the “Award Value”), (y) another
Option or SAR with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the cancelled Option or SAR, or (z) any other type of
Award. For avoidance of doubt, in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company (including an event described
in Section 5(e)), any Award may be terminated in exchange for a cash payment, and such payment is not required to exceed
the Award Value. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may terminate Awards granted in any jurisdiction outside the
United States prior to their expiration date for consideration determined by the Committee when, in the Committee’s judgment,
the administrative burden of continuing Awards in such locality outweighs the benefit to the Company. Any such action taken
with respect to an Award intended to be a stock right exempt under Section 409A of the Code shall be consistent with the
requirements for exemption under Section 409A, and any such action taken with respect to an Award that constitutes deferred
compensation under Section 409A shall be in compliance with the requirements of Section 409A. The Committee also may
modify any outstanding Awards to comply with Section 409A without consent from Participants. The Company makes no
representation or covenant that any action taken pursuant to this Section 12(b) will comply with Section 409A.
(c) The Committee shall be authorized to make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards in
recognition of changes in applicable laws, regulations or accounting principles, whenever the Committee determines that such
adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made
available under the Plan. Any such action taken with respect to an Award intended to be a stock right exempt under Section
409A of the Code shall be consistent with the requirements for exemption under Section 409A, and any such action taken with
respect to an Award that constitutes deferred compensation under Section 409A shall be in compliance with the requirements of
Section 409A. However, the Company makes no representation or covenants that Awards will comply with Section 409A.
(d) The Committee may correct any defect, supply any omission, or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or any Award in the
manner and to the extent it shall deem desirable to carry the Plan into effect.
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • B-7
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT SECTION 13. Miscellaneous.
(a) No employee, independent contractor, Participant or other person shall have any claim to be granted any Award under the
Plan, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment of employees, independent contractors, Participants, or holders or
beneficiaries of Awards, either collectively or individually, under the Plan. The terms and conditions of Awards need not be the
same with respect to each recipient.
(b) The Committee may delegate to another committee of the Board, one or more officers or managers of the Company, or a
committee of such officers or managers, the authority, subject to such terms and limitations as the Committee shall determine,
to grant Awards to, or to cancel, modify, waive rights with respect to, alter, discontinue, suspend or terminate Awards held by,
employees who are not officers or directors of the Company for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; provided, however, that any such delegation to management shall conform with the requirements of the General
Corporation Law of Delaware, as in effect from time to time.
(c) The Company shall be authorized to withhold from any Award granted or any payment due or transfer made under any Award or
under the Plan or from any compensation or other amount owing to a Participant the amount (in cash, Shares, other securities,
other Awards, or other property) of withholding taxes (including income tax, social insurance contributions, payment on account
and other taxes) due in respect of an Award, its exercise, or any payment or transfer of Shares, cash or property under such
Award or under the Plan and to take such other action (including, without limitation, providing for elective payment of such
amounts in cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards or other property by the Participant) as may be necessary in the opinion
of the Company to satisfy all obligations of the Company for the payment of such taxes.
(d) Nothing contained in the Plan shall prevent the Company from adopting or continuing in effect other or additional compensation
arrangements, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases.
(e) The grant of an Award shall not be construed as giving a Participant the right to be retained in the employ or service of the
Company or any Affiliate. Further, the Company or the applicable Affiliate may at any time dismiss a Participant from employment
or terminate the services of an independent contractor, free from any liability, or any claim under the Plan, unless otherwise
expressly provided in the Plan or in any Award Agreement or in any other agreement binding the parties.
(f) If any provision of the Plan or any Award is or becomes or is deemed to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any jurisdiction,
or as to any person or Award, or would disqualify the Plan or any Award under any law deemed applicable by the Committee,
such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to conform to applicable laws, or if it cannot be so construed or deemed
amended without, in the determination of the Committee, materially altering the intent of the Plan or the Award, such provision
shall be stricken as to such jurisdiction, person or Award, and the remainder of the Plan and any such Award shall remain in full
force and effect.
(g) Neither the Plan nor any Award shall create or be construed to create a trust or separate fund of any kind or a fiduciary
relationship between the Company and a Participant or any other person. To the extent that any person acquires a right to receive
payments from the Company pursuant to an Award, such right shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general
creditor of the Company.
(h) No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award, and the Committee shall determine whether
cash, other securities or other property shall be paid or transferred in lieu of any fractional Shares, or whether such fractional
Shares or any rights thereto shall be canceled, terminated or otherwise eliminated.
SECTION 14. Effective Date of the Plan.
The Plan shall be effective as of the date of its approval by the stockholders of the Company.
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
X
Y
SECTION 15. Term of the Plan.
No Award shall be granted under the Plan after the tenth anniversary of the effective date. However, unless otherwise expressly provided
in the Plan or in an applicable Award Agreement, any Award theretofore granted may extend beyond such date, and the authority of the
Committee and the Board under Section 12 to amend, alter, adjust, suspend, discontinue, or terminate any such Award, or to waive any
conditions or rights under any such Award, and to amend the Plan, shall extend beyond such date.
SECTION 16. Governing Law.
The Plan shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Texas without giving effect to the principles of
conflict of laws thereof.
B-8 • 2014 PROXY STATEMENT
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
APPENDIX
NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS
This proxy statement refers to (1) revenue excluding legacy wireless products (baseband products, and OMAP applications processors
and connectivity products sold into smartphone and consumer tablet applications) and (2) ratios based on free cash flow. These
are financial measures that were not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (non-GAAP
measures). Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure calculated by subtracting Capital expenditures from the most directly comparable
GAAP measure, Cash flows from operating activities (also referred to as Cash flow from operations). We believe revenue excluding
legacy wireless products provides insight into our underlying business results. We believe free cash flow and these ratios based on it
provide insight into our liquidity, our cash-generating capability and the amount of cash potentially available to return to investors, as
well as insight into our financial performance. These non-GAAP measures are supplemental to the comparable GAAP measures and are
reconciled in the tables below to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Revenue excluding legacy wireless products (amounts in millions of dollars)
Revenue (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,205
Legacy wireless revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(470)
TI Revenue less legacy wireless revenue (non-GAAP) . . . . . $11,735
2013
For Years Ended December 31,
2012
$12,825
(1,200)
$11,625
2011
$13,735
(2,391)
$11,344
2010
$13,966
(2,870)
$11,096
2013
One-Year
Growth
-4.8%
2013
Three-Year
CAGR*
-4.4%
0.9%
1.9%
* CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is calculated using the formula: (Ending Value/Beginning Value)1/number of years-1.
Free cash flow as a percentage of revenue (amounts in millions of dollars)
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash flow from operations (GAAP) . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Free cash flow (non-GAAP) . . . . . . . . . .
For Years Ended December 31,
2012
$12,825
$ 3,414
(495)
$ 2,919
2013
$12,205
$ 3,384
(412)
$ 2,972
2011
$13,735
$ 3,256
(816)
$ 2,440
Percentage of Revenue
For Years Ended December 31,
2011
2012
2013
Total
27.7% 26.6% 23.7% 25.9%
24.4% 22.8% 17.8% 21.5%
Total
$38,765
$10,054
(1,723)
$ 8,331
Total cash returned to shareholders as a percentage of free cash flow (amounts in millions of dollars)
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock repurchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total cash returned to shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Years Ended December 31,
2011
2012
$ 644
$ 819
1,800
1,973
$2,617
$2,619
2013
$1,175
2,868
$4,043
Total
$2,638
6,641
$9,279
Percentage of Cash flow from operations (GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percentage of free cash flow (non-GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
119.5%
136.0%
80.4%
76.7%
92.3%
89.7% 107.3% 111.4%
2014 PROXY STATEMENT • C-1
TEXAS INSTRUMENTSPROXY STATEMENT (This page intentionally left blank.) BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
DIRECTOR S
(cid:57)(cid:80)(cid:74)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:59)(cid:76)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:91)(cid:86)(cid:85)
Chairman of the Board,
President and
Chief Executive Officer,
Texas Instruments Incorporated
(cid:57)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:87)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:62)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:41)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:19)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:89)(cid:21)
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer,
Comerica Incorporated and
Comerica Bank
(cid:52)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:41)(cid:83)(cid:80)(cid:85)(cid:85)
President and
Chief Executive Officer,
Flowserve Corporation
(cid:43)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:83)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:42)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:87)
Retired Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer,
Eastman Kodak Company
(cid:42)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:89)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:3)(cid:58)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:42)(cid:86)(cid:95)
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer,
Humacyte, Inc.
TI FELLOWS
(cid:57)(cid:86)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:80)(cid:89)(cid:82)
Senior Of Counsel,
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
(cid:55)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:76)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:72)(cid:91)(cid:90)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:96)
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer,
MoneyGram International, Inc.
(cid:57)(cid:86)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:91)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:58)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:74)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:97)
Chairman of the Board,
President and
Chief Executive Officer,
Ryder System, Inc.
(cid:62)(cid:72)(cid:96)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:3)(cid:57)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:58)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:90)
Retired Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer,
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
(cid:57)(cid:92)(cid:91)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:58)(cid:80)(cid:84)(cid:84)(cid:86)(cid:85)(cid:90)
President Emerita,
Brown University
(cid:42)(cid:79)(cid:89)(cid:80)(cid:90)(cid:91)(cid:80)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:3)(cid:59)(cid:86)(cid:75)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:62)(cid:79)(cid:80)(cid:91)(cid:84)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)
President, The Whitman
Strategy Group
EXECUTIVE OFFICER S
(cid:57)(cid:80)(cid:74)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:59)(cid:76)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:91)(cid:86)(cid:85)
Chairman of the Board,
President and
Chief Executive Officer
(cid:53)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:83)(cid:90)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:85)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:90)(cid:82)(cid:86)(cid:92)(cid:93)
Senior Vice President
(cid:58)(cid:91)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:85)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:90)(cid:86)(cid:85)
Senior Vice President
(cid:41)(cid:89)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:59)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:42)(cid:89)(cid:92)(cid:91)(cid:74)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:89)
Senior Vice President
(cid:57)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:46)(cid:89)(cid:76)(cid:78)(cid:86)(cid:89)(cid:96)(cid:3)(cid:43)(cid:76)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:80)(cid:3)
Senior Vice President
(cid:43)(cid:72)(cid:93)(cid:80)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:86)(cid:74)(cid:82)
Senior Vice President
(cid:49)(cid:86)(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:45)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:92)(cid:73)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:79)
Senior Vice President, Secretary
and General Counsel
(cid:58)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:80)(cid:89)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:82)(cid:80)
Senior Vice President
(cid:50)(cid:76)(cid:93)(cid:80)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:52)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:79)
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(cid:57)(cid:86)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:91)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:86)(cid:93)(cid:72)(cid:82)
Senior Vice President
(cid:50)(cid:76)(cid:93)(cid:80)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:57)(cid:80)(cid:91)(cid:74)(cid:79)(cid:80)(cid:76)
Senior Vice President
(cid:49)(cid:86)(cid:79)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:58)(cid:97)(cid:74)(cid:97)(cid:90)(cid:87)(cid:86)(cid:85)(cid:80)(cid:82)(cid:19)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:89)(cid:21)
Senior Vice President
(cid:59)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:76)(cid:90)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:62)(cid:76)(cid:90)(cid:91)
Senior Vice President
(cid:43)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:62)(cid:79)(cid:80)(cid:91)(cid:72)(cid:82)(cid:76)(cid:89)
Senior Vice President
TI Fellows are engineers, scientists or technologists who are recognized by
peers and TI management for outstanding performance. Fellows are elected
based on exceptional technical contributions that significantly contribute to
TI’s shareholder value.
TI Senior Fellow announced in 2013:
Marco Corsi
TI Fellows announced in 2013:
Xiaolin Lu
Rick Oden
Jingwei Xu
STOCKHOLDER AND OTHER INFORMATION
Stockholder records information
Stockholder correspondence:
Computershare
P. O. Box 30170
College Station, TX 77842-3170
Toll free: 800-981-8676
Phone: 781-575-2000
Overnight correspondence:
Computershare
211 Quality Circle, Suite 210
College Station, TX 77845
Website: www.computershare.com/investor
For online inquiries: https://www-us.computershare.com/investor/contact
SEC Form 10-K
Stockholders may obtain a copy of the company’s
annual report to the Securities and Exchange
Commission on Form 10-K (except for exhibits)
and its audited financial statements without
charge by writing to:
Investor Relations
P.O. Box 660199, MS 8657
Dallas, TX 75266-0199
DLP, OMAP and the platform bar are trademarks of Texas Instruments. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Texas Instruments Incorporated
P.O. Box 660199
Dallas, TX 75266-0199
www.ti.com
An equal opportunity employer
© 2014 Texas Instruments Incorporated
TI-30002