More annual reports from The Interpublic Group of Companies:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of The Interpublic Group of Companies:
IVE GroupTHE INTERPUBLIC GROUP, 2001 AS ALWAYS, DIFFICULT TIMES REQUIRE AN UNPRECEDENTED FOCUS ON GETTING THE FUNDAMENTALS RIGHT. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Interpublic is one of the world’s largest marketing communications and marketing services companies. Fundamentally, we are in the idea business. We provide clients with customer-driven insights, strategic communications programs and other marketing counsel that will help them build their business. TABLE OF CONTENTS FINANCIAL ANALYSIS MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN McCANN-ERICKSON WORLDGROUP THE PARTNERSHIP FCB GROUP ADVANCED MARKETING SERVICES THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP STRUCTURE PROFESSIONAL ACHIEVEMENTS 2001 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1 2 6 8 10 12 14 16 17 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts and Number of Employees) 2001 2000 $ 6,726.8 (208.1) $ -3.1% (505.3) 369.0 $ $ 935.2 $11,514.7 $ 2,933.7 59.7% -22.6% $ 7,182.7 849.1 $ 11.8% 420.3 370.6 $ $ 844.6 $12,362.0 $ 2,081.1 45.6% 18.2% $ $ (1.37) 0.38 $ $ 1.14 0.37 54,100 62,000 2001 2000 $ 6,726.8 776.0 $ 11.5% 359.2 376.6 $ $ 7,182.7 $ 1,026.8 14.3% 570.3 377.3 $ 13.1% 23.5% $0.96 $1.53 Year Ended December 31 ACTUAL RESULTS REVENUE AND INCOME Revenue Operating Income (loss) As a % of Revenue Net Income (loss) Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (diluted) FINANCIAL POSITION Cash and Cash Equivalents Total Assets Total Debt Debt as a % of Total Capital Return on Average Stockholders’ Equity PER SHARE DATA Diluted EPS Cash Dividends OTHER Number of Employees Year Ended December 31 RESULTS EXCLUDING NON-RECURRING ITEMS REVENUE AND INCOME Revenue Operating Income * As a % of Revenue Net Income * Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (diluted) * FINANCIAL POSITION Return on Average Stockholders’ Equity * PER SHARE DATA Diluted EPS* * Operating Income excluding non-recurring items excludes restructuring and other merger related costs (pre-tax costs of $645.6 and $177.7 in 2001 and 2000, respectively), goodwill impairment and other charges (pre-tax charges of $303.1 in 2001), pre-tax charges of $85.4 in 2001 relating primarily to the impaired value of operating assets and a pre-tax credit of $50 in 2001 resulting from reductions in previously established severance reserves. Net Income excluding non-recurring items also excludes a pre-tax charge of $208.3 in 2001 reducing the carrying value of other investments and a $25.7 charge in 2000 related to the Company’s portion of asset impairment and restructuring charges by an investment accounted for on the equity method. Actual reported net income including these costs was a loss of $505.3 in 2001 and income of $420.3 in 2000. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 1 Financial Analysis MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN It almost goes without saying that 2001 was a challenging year, for both our industry and our company. It does, however, bear noting that these past twelve months were vital as we refocused on the fundamentals and laid the groundwork for a new Interpublic. Like most every business, we felt the effects of the economic downturn that began in the United States in the second quarter and accelerated as a result of the tragic events of September 11. For the media and marketing sector, the implications were particularly stark. We found ourselves oper- ating against the most adverse conditions in over 50 years. Interpublic’s results are reflective of these difficulties. Our performance was also affected by a major restructuring pro- gram that has already begun to yield significant cost savings as of the fourth quarter. The benefits of this restructuring will continue to be felt. Barring a further economic reversal, we believe that we can deliver double-digit earnings per share growth in 2002 despite the current harsh environment. Our 2001 results also reflect the challenges of integrating a major strategic acquisition. For the year, revenues were down 6%, to $6.7 billion. Exclu- sive of the loss of the Chrysler account by True North Commu- nications prior to our acquiring them, our revenues declined 4.8%. Pro forma net income, before restructuring and other unusual charges, was $359.2 million, compared to $570.3 million in 2000. Pro forma earnings were $0.96 per diluted share for 2001, as against $1.53 per diluted share in 2000. These numbers, while sobering, do not tell the full story of This puts a premium on business-building ideas. The kind what was a significant transitional year for our company. One of ideas that set companies apart from their competition, in which we substantially upgraded our financial disciplines or cement the relationships between consumers and brands. and infrastructure, at both the corporate level and within And that is what Interpublic is about. all of our operating units. Obviously, this is an ongoing effort and our goal is to stay vigilant and constantly keep costs in In 2001, we took numerous steps to improve our ability to line with anticipated revenues. I am satisfied that we now deliver on behalf of clients in this evolving environment. have the fundamental planning tools and processes to live up to that obligation. Chief among those steps was the acquisition of True North Communications, which brought another quality marketing 2001 was also the year in which we added a third global network into our portfolio of companies, thereby expanding marketing services network, firmly securing our place within the range of combined and integrated services we can offer the top tier of our ever-consolidating industry. A year that to our clients on a worldwide basis. saw us undertake the most sweeping reorganization in the company’s history, focused on delivering an integrated mar- Another significant initiative that strengthens our position for keting offering to all of our clients while simultaneously the future was the reorganization in which we grouped our streamlining our operations. In short, a tough but productive companies so they can better serve client needs, while simul- period during which we poised ourselves for improved per- taneously facilitating collaboration between our agencies and formance and long-term growth. streamlining our internal reporting relationships to promote greater accountability. While the signs of an imminent economic recovery remain mixed, or seemingly distant, the future of our industry is The new structure that emerged, organizes all of our com- clearly bright. Media has never been more fragmented, panies into four groups. Three—the McCann-Erickson or consumers more powerful. New technologies are further WorldGroup, The Partnership and the FCB Group—deliver transforming the marketing landscape. As a result, our a full range of interconnected marketing services to current business is becoming increasingly complex and sophisti- and prospective clients. A number of our independent cated. For companies everywhere, differentiating their advertising agency brands are allied with these three princi- brands is more difficult—yet more vital—than ever. Because pal groups for access to an international network, or for brands represent the best and most direct route to sustained, additional capabilities. profitable growth. (continued on next page) 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 3 Message from the Chairman MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN (continued) All of our agencies tap into a fourth group, Advanced Mar- Worldwide was named the experiential and event marketing keting Services, for services and counsel in constituency “Agency of the Year” on three continents, while interactive management, marketing intelligence and specialized market- agency Zentropy Partners won that coveted honor in the ing services. Advanced Marketing Services is also charged highly competitive U.K. market. Torre Lazur McCann Health- with developing new, leading-edge offerings that can be made care Worldwide won more top creative awards on a worldwide available to all of the companies and clients of Interpublic. basis than any of its competitors. It’s a powerful model we believe will help us achieve many Highlights at The Partnership agencies included a success- of our key objectives. It allows us to focus on the fundamen- ful management transition at Lowe & Partners Worldwide, tals of client service and creativity. It makes the broadest where Jerry Judge, a long-time Lowe executive, took over the range of communications disciplines available to all of our global CEO role from the company’s founder. Jerry’s new clients. It allows each of our companies to retain its inde- leadership team strengthened the relationships with and won pendence and its culture. And it will pave Interpublic’s path new business from key multinational clients. Lowe was also to future growth. recognized by local advertising publications as the “Agency of the Year” in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, The past year saw our companies once again garner impor- Argentina, Italy and Austria. DraftWorldwide maintained its tant industry recognition, as well as over $5.5 billion in new position as the number one global marketing services com- business billings, around the world. pany and the top direct marketer in the U.S. McCann-Erickson Advertising won “Agency of the Year” honors Within the newly-formed FCB Group, notable performers in every region of the world, including its fourth consecutive included FCB New Zealand, Ad Age’s “Asia Pacific Agency such designation in the United States and its third in Europe. of the Year,” and R/GA, Adweek’s “Interactive Agency of McCann-Erickson Advertising was also the top winner among the Year.” all agencies at the international AME awards recognizing effective communications. Our independent agencies notched significant accomplish- ments and honors. For the fourth year in a row, Deutsch In every discipline, the McCann-Erickson WorldGroup’s corri- received “Agency of the Year” recognition from Adweek after dor agencies also distinguished themselves. Direct Marketing posting one of the strongest new business years of any U.S. and CRM company, MRM Partners, became the international agency. Carmichael Lynch won the coveted O’Toole Award leader in custom publishing and branded content. Momentum from the American Association of Advertising Agencies, given 4 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Message from the Chairman by the industry to an agency in recognition of the total body Magna Global will allow our agencies and their clients to get of creative work done for its clients. Campbell-Ewald’s over- best-in-class service without infringing on the individual agen- all strong performance helped it garner Adweek regional cies, or the proprietary interests of their clients. honors as the Midwestern “Agency of the Year.” At the end of the day, that is what it’s all about: Getting the Advanced Marketing Services companies in every communi- fundamentals right, for our clients and our shareholders. cations discipline also shone in terms of industry recognition. Weber Shandwick was a leading winner at the Public Relations We have always had the companies and the capabilities to Society of America awards, while Golin/Harris was responsi- deliver. We have talented and dedicated employees around ble for the “International Campaign of the Year” (according the world who deserve our thanks for all their efforts, particu- to PR Week) and the year’s “Best Cause-Related Marketing larly these past twelve months. With the addition of True Campaign” (at the SABRE Awards). North and our new reorganization, we have more best-in-class offerings than at any point in our company’s history—all During 2001, we acquired DeVries as our third leading public focused around the needs of clients in today’s increasingly relations capability. And by joining True North agency BSMG sophisticated marketing environment. with Weber Shandwick, we created the world’s largest provider of public relations and corporate communications counsel. Together, our mix of services and our client-centric model will drive growth. We now also have in place the corporate struc- Our event marketing company, Jack Morton, our sport mar- ture and the financial systems to capture the benefits of our keting agency, Octagon, and our market research firm, NFO success and better deliver value to our shareholders. WorldGroup, all maintained their leadership positions and con- tinued to produce the highest quality of thinking and work I believe we will look back on 2001 as the year we refocused, for clients. Global Hue, our multicultural U.S. marketing unit, retooled and emerged revitalized for the challenges and the saw continued success in this growing field. years ahead. We also launched Magna Global, the world’s largest media services operation. Housed within the Advanced Marketing Thank you for your continued support, Services group to ensure confidentiality, Magna Global will represent the combined media negotiating interests of Inter- public’s media entities. Like our new corporate structure, JOHN J. DOONER, JR. CHAIRMAN AND CEO, THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 5 Message from the Chairman McCANN-ERICKSON WORLDGROUP The McCann-Erickson WorldGroup encompasses a range of best-in-class, specialist, global market- ing communications companies, anchored by the strength and quality of McCann-Erickson Advertising Worldwide. Member companies share a common culture of leadership, accountability and creativity. They are committed to achieving collaborative solutions through shared operating principles and strategic processes. McCann-Erickson WorldGroup works with 25 multi- national marketers in three or more disciplines across multiple geographies. We are proud to operate leading worldwide networks in all the key communi- cations disciplines. McCann-Erickson Worldwide Advertising is the world’s largest global advertising agency network, with operations in over 130 countries and 2001 billings of more than $27 billion. MRM Partners Worldwide provides outstanding service to clients in every aspect of relationship marketing, including direct response advertising, loyalty marketing, data- base management, custom publishing, telemarket- ing and digital strategy through Zentropy Partners. Momentum Worldwide is a recognized leader in the emerging field of experiential marketing and the largest company in its industry. FutureBrand is a leading global brand consultancy firm providing comprehensive corporate and consumer branding services. Torre Lazur McCann Healthcare WorldWide ranks among the top three global healthcare com- munications companies. Recent results—measured by the effectiveness of the work we do for our clients, new clients won, or industry accolades—provide a stirring validation of the McCann-Erickson WorldGroup’s strategic expan- sion into global marketing communications activities. BY ANY MEASURE, WE HAVE SEEN A STIRRING VALIDATION OF OUR STRATEGIC FOCUS ON BRINGING GLOBAL CAPABILITIES TO EACH KEY AREA OF MARKETING. JAMES HEEKIN CHAIRMAN & CEO, McCANN-ERICKSON WORLDGROUP 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 7 McCann-Erickson WorldGroup THE PARTNERSHIP The Partnership—a powerful organizing principle that allows us to bring together leading companies across disciplines and geography. Partner agencies are frequently selected by clients on the basis of their culture and capabilities. The Partnership structure allows them to retain that independence. It also provides access to a new way of working together for the benefit of those clients that require global reach or a full range of integrated marketing services. Among the companies that make up this new group, Lowe & Partners Worldwide is the largest advertising agency, with offices in 80 countries. In spite of its size, Lowe has stayed true to its history and culture, which accounts for the fact that it is one of the most creatively awarded agencies in the world. Draft- Worldwide is the number one direct marketing company in the United States and the largest global marketing services firm. Initiative Media regularly partners with Lowe and Draft, bringing its power and know how as the largest independent media com- pany in the world. Launched at mid-year 2001, The Partnership has already allowed these stand-alone agencies to com- bine their expertise and deliver a powerful intercon- nected service offering. Other partner agencies, which include a number of advertising’s leading mar- quee creative brands, use The Partnership to access international reach and tap into broader Interpublic resources. As a result, clients get customized solu- tions that incorporate the precise marketing services required to address their business needs. BY FOCUSING ON CONNECTING BEST-IN-CLASS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES WITH DEEP, SPECIALIZED CAPABILITIES, WE HAVE CREATED A NEW MODEL FOR MARKETING COLLABORATION. DAVID BELL VICE-CHAIRMAN, THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 9 The Partnership FCB GROUP The FCB Group is a marketing communications net- work made up of several of the largest companies of True North Communications, which was acquired by Interpublic in 2001. At the heart of this network is Foote, Cone & Beld- ing Worldwide, one of the largest U.S. advertising agencies, with 2001 billings of nearly $8 billion and more than 190 offices in 103 countries. The group’s global database marketing and full-service CRM arm, ANALYTICi helps clients manage their relation- ship with customers at every touch point. Marketing Drive Worldwide creates world-class promotional marketing solutions internationally. The Hacker Group specializes in all facets of direct marketing, from strategic program design to sophisticated back end analysis. Two top ten players in their respec- tive sectors, direct and digital agency FCBi and FCB Healthcare, round out the group. Simply stated, FCB’s expertise—and our point of difference—is our ability to both sell today and build lasting brands. That is what drives our “Model of One” operating strategy. To every client, we assign one account leader for all disciplines, worldwide. One senior management team to oversee the business. An integrated account team that works off a single strategy and executes one broad creative idea across all channels of customer contact. And one more thing: a single bot- tom line—a most compelling argument for power- ful collaboration. This model is deployed seamlessly across all of FCB’s disciplines. Our proprietary consumer research tools and our commitment to measuring the effectiveness of marketing communications further enhance the odds of success. By unifying and focusing all our efforts around cli- ents’ needs, we create a whole far greater than the sum of its parts. BY UNIFYING AND FOCUSING ALL OUR EFFORTS AROUND CLIENTS’ NEEDS, WE CREATE A WHOLE FAR GREATER THAN THE SUM OF ITS PARTS. BRENDAN RYAN CEO, FCB GROUP 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 11 FCB Group ADVANCED MARKETING SERVICES Advanced Marketing Services combines the best traditional resources and the most innovative marketing offerings to provide clients with an array of interconnected solutions. In 2001, the group operated in 47 countries through leading companies in public relations and strategic communications, market research and specialized services. Advanced Marketing Services is also charged with expanding the Interpublic charter by developing next-genera- tion marketing capabilities. The group is at the forefront of constituency man- agement through its three leading public relations agency networks: Weber Shandwick Worldwide, Golin/ Harris International and DeVries Public Relations. All three work in concert with Interpublic’s integrated marketing communications groups—McCann-Erick- son WorldGroup, FCB Group and The Partnership— on clients’ total communications programs. Marketing intelligence is largely the province of NFO WorldGroup, one of the world’s largest custom research organizations, offering a comprehensive suite of research services and proprietary products. Advanced Marketing Services is home to a number of sector-leading companies that offer specialized marketing services. These include: Jack Morton Worldwide, the world’s largest event and experiential marketing agency; Octagon, a leader in the sports marketing arena; ISO Healthcare Consulting, a spe- cialized strategic management consulting firm; and Global Hue, a specialist in multicultural marketing. Magna Global, Interpublic’s media negotiation entity, is also housed within Advanced Marketing Services, in order to ensure complete neutrality and confiden- tiality. Magna leverages over $40 billion in media billings to the benefit of clients. OUR CHARTER HAS SUCCESSFULLY FOCUSED ON DEVELOPING NEXT-GENERATION CAPABILITIES ACROSS THE TOTAL MARKETING SPECTRUM. LARRY WEBER CHAIRMAN & CEO, ADVANCED MARKETING SERVICES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 13 Advanced Marketing Services THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP ORGANIZED FOR CLIENTS AND GROWTH … 2001 saw a significant reorganization at Interpublic in which we grouped our companies so that they can better serve client needs. The new structure that emerged organizes all of our companies into four groups. Three—the McCann-Erickson WorldGroup, the FCB Group and The Partnership—deliver a full range of interconnected marketing services to current and prospective clients. A number of our independent advertising agency brands are allied with these three principal groups for access to an international network or for additional marketing capabilities. All of our agencies tap into the Advanced Marketing Services group for service offerings and counsel in three areas: constituency management, marketing intelligence and specialized marketing services. Advanced Marketing Services also develops new leading-edge offerings that are available to all of the companies and clients of Interpublic. MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE … Housed within many of our companies are additional resources that our clients can use to their advantage. Weber Shandwick agencies Rogers & Cowan and Bragman Nyman Cafarelli are leaders in entertainment and lifestyle PR and marketing. PMK/BHB, a World- Group company, is Hollywood’s largest public relations agency. Last year, the newly-launched Magna Entertainment unit developed 11 hours of prime-time programming for Interpublic clients, more than any other company in our industry. NSA, part of Initiative Media and The Partnership, is the largest newspaper supplement planner and newspaper space buyer for U.S. retailers. OSI, also an Initiative Media company, is the largest independent buyer of out of home media in the United States. Interpublic companies also have a substantial Washington D.C. presence. Golin/Harris agency Barbour Griffith & Rogers is a company of lawyers, policy specialists and other professionals who can assist clients as their advocates in federal government relations or with their link to state governments. Within Weber Shandwick, Cassidy & Associates provides government affairs and strategic communications counsel to help clients achieve their legislative and regulatory goals. Powell Tate, also part of Weber Shandwick, is a full service public relations agency specializing in public affairs commu- nications. A third Weber Shandwick company, Rowan Blewitt, is a premier issue and crisis management consulting firm. 14 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Organized for Clients and Growth McCANN-ERICKSON WORLDGROUP INDEPENDENT AGENCIES THE PARTNERSHIP FCB GROUP • McCANN-ERICKSON ADVERTISING • MRM PARTNERS • CAMPBELL- EWALD • CARMICHAEL LYNCH • DEUTSCH • GOTHAM • UNIVERSAL McCANN • HILL HOLLIDAY • MOMENTUM • TORRE LAZUR McCANN HEALTHCARE • FUTUREBRAND • NAS • CAMPBELL MITHUN • BOZELL • MULLEN • DAILEY & ASSOCIATES • THE MARTIN AGENCY • TEMERLIN McCLAIN • AVRETT FREE & GINSBERG • TIERNEY COMMUNICATIONS • FITZGERALD & COMPANY • SUISSA MILLER • AUSTIN KELLEY • HOWARD MERRELL • LOWE & PARTNERS WORLDWIDE • DRAFTWORLDWIDE • INITIATIVE MEDIA WORLDWIDE • LOWE HEALTHCARE • ZIPATONI • FOOTE, CONE & BELDING • FCBi • ANALYTICi • FCB HEALTHCARE • MARKETING DRIVE WORLDWIDE • R/GA • HACKER GROUP ADVANCED MARKETING SERVICES MARKET RESEARCH SPORTS MARKETING • NFO WORLDGROUP • OCTAGON MEETINGS & EVENTS PUBLIC RELATIONS HEALTHCARE CONSULTING MEDIA NEGOTIATION & PROGRAMMING • JACK MORTON WORLDWIDE • WEBER SHANDWICK WORLDWIDE • GOLIN/HARRIS INTERNATIONAL • DeVRIES • ISO • MAGNA GLOBAL PROFESSIONAL ACHIEVEMENTS 2001 McCann-Erickson Advertising wins “Agency of the Year” honors in all regions of the world— in Europe for the third consecutive year and in the United States for the fourth. McCann-Erickson Advertising is the top winner of AME awards recognizing effective communications. Zentropy Partners named “New Media Agency of the Year” in the U.K. MRM Partners becomes the international leader in custom publishing and branded content. Momentum Worldwide named “Agency of the Year” in its sector on three continents—in the United States, Spain and Brazil. Torre Lazur McCann Healthcare Worldwide wins more top creative awards on a worldwide basis than any competitor. Lowe & Partners Worldwide successfully completes management transition as Jerry Judge, a long-time senior Lowe executive succeeds its founder as the agency’s CEO. The power of The Partnership recognized by Verizon when it consolidates its business in the group. Lowe adds multinational assignments from current clients including Best Foods/Unilever, Coca-Cola and Nestlé. Lowe wins “Agency of the Year” honors in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Argentina, Italy and Austria. DraftWorldwide maintains its position as the number one global marketing services company and the top U.S. direct marketing company. Initiative Media collaborates with another member of The Partnership, DraftWorldwide to create ID, the United States’ largest direct response planning and buying organization. Deutsch enjoys one of the strongest new business years of any agency in the United States. For the fourth year in a row, it receives “Agency of the Year” recognition from Adweek. Carmichael Lynch is awarded the AAAA’s O’Toole Award. The O’Toole Award is given by the industry to an agency in recognition of the total body of creative work provided to all its clients. Foote, Cone & Belding introduces the FCB Blueprint, a set of proprietary tools, including Mind & Mood, Chess and Relationship Monitor, which dramatically increase the odds of success for clients. FCB’s “Model of One” strategy embraced by key clients. Integrated wins include Circuit City, Eli Lilly and GlaxoSmithKline in the United States, as well as Olympus, Weetabix and Iberia Airlines in Europe. In Asia Pacific, FCB wins its largest ever pan-regional assignment, demonstrating the growing strength of its network in this important region. FCB strengthens its senior ranks with the addition of Gene Bartley as President, FCB Worldwide and the promotion of Jonathan Harries to Worldwide Creative Director. FCB New Zealand named Ad Age Global’s “Asia Pacific Agency of the Year.” R/GA, the leading-edge digital marketing company, follows up its designation as Adweek’s “Best Creative Interactive Agency” for 2000 with “Interactive Agency of the Year” honors for 2001. The integration of BSMG into Weber Shandwick Worldwide creates the world’s largest and most power- ful strategic communications and public relations firm. Throughout the process, Weber Shandwick continues to garner industry honors. Among them, 10 Gold, Silver and Bronze Anvil awards from the Public Relations Society of America, three IPR (UK) Awards of Excellence and a Public Relations Consultants Association award. Golin/Harris International’s industry honors include PR Week’s International Campaign of the Year, SABRE Award for best Cause-Related Marketing Campaign and two PRSA Silver Anvils. NFO’s industry awards include the EXPLOR Award for exemplary performance and leadership in online research, sponsored by AC Nielsen Center for Marketing Research, the University of Wisconsin School of Business and the American Marketing Association. Jack Morton Worldwide wins three gold medals from the International Visual Communications Association, nine New York Festivals Film and Video Awards, a gold medal for the Best Conference from the Incentive Travel & Meetings Association, and its twelfth Emmy Award for Broadcast Set Design. Octagon, the world’s second-largest sports marketing firm, consolidates its headquarters to New York, with co-founder Les Delano becoming Chief Executive Officer. Octagon also becomes the leader in Olympic marketing programs, securing five key sponsors for the upcoming Olympic Games in Greece. Magna Global launches its Magna Global Entertainment to create proprietary programming for Interpublic clients and their brands. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 15 16 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Organized for Clients and Growth Professional Achievements FINANCIALS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA FOR FIVE YEARS RESULTS BY QUARTER REPORT OF MANAGEMENT 18 30 31 32 34 35 36 54 55 56 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 17 Financial Statements MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) OVERVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT EVENTS The year 2001 contained several significant events for the Company as it completed a major acquisition and implemented a wide ranging restructuring plan. Further, the Company’s operating results were negatively impacted by very weak demand for its services and by the cost of the restructuring plan and other asset impairment write-offs. The significant events that occurred during the year were as follows: ACQUISITION OF TRUE NORTH On June 22, 2001, the Company acquired True North Communications Inc. (“True North”), a global provider of adver- tising and communication services, in a transaction accounted for as a pooling of interests. The Company issued approximately 58.2 million shares in connection with the acquisition. The acquisition increased the size of the Company’s operations by approximately 25%. The acquisition precipitated a major reorganization and restructuring (see below) and resulted in some one-time revenue losses as client conflicts materialized. REORGANIZATION AND RESTRUCTURING PLAN Following the True North acquisition in June 2001, the Company undertook a series of operational initiatives focusing on: a) the integration of the True North operations and the identification of synergies and savings, b) the realignment of certain Interpublic businesses and c) productivity initiatives to achieve higher operating margins. As a result of these initiatives, the combined Company has been organized into four global operating groups. Three of these groups, McCann-Erickson WorldGroup, an enhanced FCB Group and a new global marketing resource called The Partnership, will provide a full complement of global marketing services and marketing communication services. The fourth group, Advanced Marketing Services, focuses on expanding the Company’s operations in the areas of specialized marketing communications and services. In connection with these initiatives, the Company is executing a wide-ranging restructuring plan that includes severance, lease terminations and other actions. The total amount of the charges recorded in connection with the plan was $645.6 which included severance for approximately 6,800 employees and the downsizing or closure of 180 offices. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS The year 2001 was challenging for both the Company and the advertising and marketing communications industry as a whole. The Company found itself operating against the most adverse conditions in over 50 years. Demand for most of the Company’s services dropped dramatically and this had a severe impact on the Company’s profitability. The drop in demand was not limited to any one of the Company’s service offerings nor to any geographical region. It has been estimated that media spending in 2001 dropped by about 4% in the U.S. and by about 3% internationally compared to the prior year, with the drop accelerating as the year progressed. The Company’s revenue in the fourth quarter 2001 was severely impacted by the worsening economic conditions as reflected in the 16% drop in its revenue compared to the fourth quarter of the prior year. CREDIT FACILITY AND OTHER BORROWINGS During the year, the Company entered into the following financing transactions: a) On June 26, 2001, the Company replaced its maturing $375.0, 364-day syndicated revolving multi-currency credit agreement with a substantially similar $500.0 facility. The new facility bears interest at variable rates based on either LIBOR or a bank’s base rate, at the Company’s option. b) On August 22, 2001, the Company completed the issuance and sale of $500.0 principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2011. The notes bear interest at a rate of 7.25% per annum. The Company used the net proceeds of approximately $493 from the sale of the notes to repay outstanding indebtedness under its credit facilities. c) In December 2001, the Company completed the issuance and sale of approximately $702 of aggregate principal amount of Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2021. The yield to maturity of the notes was 1%. The net proceeds from the offering of approximately $563.5 were used to pay down short-term debt. OTHER WRITE-OFFS During the year, the Company performed a review of its assets and identified certain items that had become impaired. Accordingly, significant charges were taken primarily for goodwill (total charges of $303.1) and investment write-downs (total charges of $208.3). 18 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) OUTLOOK RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Company’s results of operations are dependent upon: a) maintaining and growing its revenue, b) the ability to gain new clients, c) the continuous alignment of its costs to its revenue and d) retaining key personnel. Revenue is also highly dependent on overall economic conditions. As discussed above, 2001 was a very difficult year for the Company. During the year, spending by clients on most marketing services was reduced and the reduction was felt worldwide. While most of the reduction was due to general recessionary conditions, the marketing industry was particularly hard hit as clients, many of whom seemed to have been surprised by the suddenness of the recession, looked to their advertising and marketing budgets for the quickest cuts. Thus the drop in demand for services in our industry was more severe than that noted in the overall economy. On June 22, 2001, the Company acquired True North in a transaction accounted for as a pooling of interests. The Company’s financial statements have been restated for all prior periods to reflect the results of True North. The following discussion relates to the combined results of the Company after giving effect to the pooling of interests with True North. All amounts discussed below are reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) unless otherwise noted. In certain discussions below, the Company has provided comparative comments based on net income and expense amounts excluding non-recurring items (which are described in Non-Recurring Items below). Such amounts do not reflect GAAP; however, management believes they are a relevant and useful measure of financial performance. Going into 2002, it is clear that any improvement is likely The Company reported a net loss of $505.3 or $1.37 to be very gradual and will be off a very weak base. Industry watchers have indicated that their current expectation for 2002 is that overall spending on media will grow in the 1% range. The Company has taken steps to improve its operating performance and to bring its cost structure in line with the current revenue environment. The restructuring program announced in the third quarter of 2001 has already begun to yield significant cost savings. The annualized savings from the plan are expected to exceed $250. As of December 2001, the Company’s headcount has been reduced from approximately 62,000 (at December 31, 2000) to 54,100 primarily due to the restructuring program. Barring a further economic downturn, the Company believes that its 2002 earnings per share will reflect double-digit growth over the 2001 earnings per share excluding non-recurring items. NET INCOME (LOSS) Net income (loss), as reported Less non-recurring items: Salaries and related expenses — (reduction in severance reserves) Office and general expenses — (write-off of operating assets) Restructuring and other merger related costs Goodwill impairment and other charges Investment impairment Tax effect of above items Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates (asset impairment and restructuring charges) Total non-recurring items Net income excluding non-recurring items diluted loss per share, net income of $420.3 or $1.14 diluted earnings per share and net income of $359.4 or $0.99 diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Net income excluding non-recurring items was $359.2 or $0.96 diluted earnings per share, $570.3 or $1.53 diluted earnings per share and $460.4 or $1.26 diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The following table sets forth net income (loss) as reported and excluding non-recurring items: 2001 2000 1999 $(505.3) $ 420.3 $ 359.4 50.0 (85.4) (645.6) (303.1) (208.3) 327.9 (864.5) $ 359.2 (177.7) (159.5) 53.4 58.5 (25.7) (150.0) $ 570.3 (101.0) $ 460.4 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 19 Financial Statements MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) REVENUE OPERATING EXPENSES Worldwide operating expenses for 2001 increased $601.3 to $6,934.9. Operating expenses excluding non-recurring items were $5,950.8, a decrease of 3.3% over 2000. Operating expenses outside the United States increased 4.6%, while domestic operating expenses decreased 6.5%. The decrease in worldwide operating expenses reflected the benefit of the Company’s restructuring initiatives in the latter part of the year and other operating cost reduction initiatives partially offset by an increase in amortization of intangible assets due to the higher level of acquisitions in the year 2000 over 1999. The components of the total change of (3.3)% were: acquisitions net of divestitures 0.7%, impact of foreign currency changes (2.1)%, impact of the loss of the Chrysler account (1.6)% and organic operating expenses (0.3)%. Worldwide operating expenses for 2000 increased $565.8 to $6,333.6. Operating expenses excluding non-recurring items were $6,155.9, an increase of 9.8% over 1999, comprised of a 2.8% increase in international expenses and a 15.3% increase in domestic expenses. The components of the total change of 9.8% were: acquisitions 3.4%, impact of foreign currency changes (3.0)% and organic operating expenses 9.4%. The Company’s expenses related to employee compensation and various employee incentive and benefit programs amount to approximately 56% of revenue. The employee incentive programs are based primarily upon operating results. Salaries and related expenses for 2001 decreased $248.1 to $3,787.1. Salaries and related expenses excluding non-recurring items were $3,837.1, a decrease of 4.9%. The decrease is a result of lower headcount, which was reduced to 54,100 or 12.7% at December 31, 2001 from 62,000 at December 31, 2000, and reduced incentive compensation commensurate with performance. Of the total headcount reduction of 7,900, approximately 5,200 are a direct result of the Company’s 2001 restructuring plan. The components of the total change of (4.9)% were: acquisitions net of divestitures 0.8%, impact of foreign currency changes (2.0)%, impact of the loss of the Chrysler account (1.4)% and organic salaries and related expenses (2.3)%. Salaries and related expenses were $4,035.2 in 2000 and $3,617.4 in 1999, an increase of 11.5%. The increase was a result of growth from acquisitions and new business gains. The total headcount increased by 7,200 or 13.1% at December 31, 2000 from the prior year. The components of the total change of 11.5% were: acquisitions 4.2%, impact of foreign currency changes (2.0)% and organic salaries and related expenses 9.3%. Worldwide revenue for 2001 was $6,726.8, a decrease of $455.9 or 6.3% from 2000. Domestic revenue, which represented 57% of revenue in 2001, decreased $438.4 or 10.3% from 2000. International revenue, which represented 43% of revenue in 2001, decreased $17.5 or 0.6% from 2000. International revenue would have increased 5.0% excluding the effects of changes in foreign currency. The decrease in worldwide revenue was a result of reduced demand for advertising and marketing services due to the weak economy, particularly in the United States, the negative impact of the events of September 11 and the loss of the Chrysler account in the fourth quarter of 2000. The compo- nents of the total revenue change of (6.3)% were: acquisitions net of divestitures 0.9%, impact of foreign currency changes (2.2)%, impact of the loss of the Chrysler account (1.6)%, the estimated impact of the events of September 11 (0.5)% and organic revenue decline of (2.9)%. Organic changes in revenue are based on increases or decreases in net new business activity and increases or decreases from existing client accounts. Worldwide revenue for 2000 was $7,182.7, an increase of $765.5 or 11.9% over 1999. Domestic revenue, which represented 59% of revenue, increased $620 or 17.1% over 1999. International revenue, which represented 41% of revenue in 2000, increased $145.5 or 5.2% over 1999. International revenue would have increased 14.5% excluding the effects of changes in foreign currency. The increase in worldwide revenue was a result of both growth from new business gains and growth from acquisitions. The components of the total revenue change of 11.9% were: acquisitions 3.6%, impact of foreign currency changes (4.2)% and organic revenue 12.5%. The Company is a worldwide global marketing services company, providing clients with communications expertise in four broad areas: a) advertising and media management, b) marketing communications, which includes client relationship management (direct marketing), public relations, sales promotion, event marketing, on-line marketing and healthcare marketing, c) marketing intelligence, which includes custom marketing research, brand consultancy and database management and d) specialized marketing services, which includes sports and entertainment marketing, corporate meetings and events, retail marketing and other marketing and business services. The following table sets forth the estimated revenue breakdown by type of service offering. Management of the Company believes that this breakdown is a useful measure of the types of global marketing services provided. This presentation does not represent the way in which the Company is organized or managed since most of the services are offered by each of the Company’s global operating groups: 2001 2000 1999 Advertising and Media Management Marketing Communications Marketing Intelligence Specialized Marketing Services $4,001 1,823 446 457 $4,450 1,855 461 417 $4,155 1,511 464 287 Total Revenue $6,727 $7,183 $6,417 20 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) Office and general expenses increased $49.7 in 2001 to $2,026.1. Office and general expenses excluding non-recurring items were $1,940.7, a decrease of 1.8%. The decrease was due to the impact of foreign currency changes and the impact of the loss of the Chrysler account, offset by higher office rental and supplies costs. However, during the latter part of the year, the Company benefited from the restructuring plan initiatives, including reduced travel and entertainment costs and reduced office rental and supplies costs. The components of the total change of (1.8)% were: acquisitions net of divestitures 0.4%, impact of foreign currency changes (2.4)%, impact of the loss of the Chrysler account (2.2)% and organic office and general expenses 2.4%. A summary of the components of the total restructuring and other merger related costs in 2001, together with an analysis of the cash and non-cash elements, is as follows: TOTAL RECORDED CASH PAID IN 2001 NON-CASH ITEMS LIABILITY AT DECEMBER 31, 2001 TOTAL BY TYPE Severance and termination costs $297.5 $143.5 $ – $154.0 Lease termination and other exit costs Transaction costs 310.9 37.2 55.2 31.5 98.6 5.7 157.1 – Total $645.6 $230.2 $104.3 $311.1 Office and general expenses for 2000 were $1,976.4, an The severance and termination costs relate to approxi- increase of 6.1% over 1999. The increase was a result of higher new business development costs, higher office rental and supplies costs, higher travel and entertainment costs and increased depreciation costs. The components of the total change of 6.1% were: acquisitions 3.4%, impact of foreign currency changes (5.1)% and organic office and general expenses 7.8%. Amortization of intangible assets increased $28.7 to $173.0 in 2001 and increased $15.9 to $144.3 in 2000. The year over year increase reflects the increased level of acquisition activity in 1999 and 2000. See New Accounting Standards sec- tion for discussion of accounting for goodwill and other intan- gible assets going forward. NON-RECURRING ITEMS RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER MERGER RELATED COSTS 2001 ACTIVITIES Following the completion of the True North acquisition in June 2001, the Company initiated a series of operational initiatives focusing on: a) the integration of the True North operations and the identification of synergies and savings, b) the realignment of certain Interpublic businesses and c) productivity initiatives to achieve higher operating margins. As a result of the operational initiatives, the combined Company has been organized into four global operating groups. Three of these groups, McCann- Erickson WorldGroup, an enhanced FCB Group and a new global marketing resource called The Partnership, provide a full complement of global marketing services and marketing communication services. The fourth group, Advanced Marketing Services, focuses on expanding the Company’s operations in the area of specialized marketing communications and services. In connection with the operational initiatives, the Company executed a wide-ranging restructuring plan that included severance, lease terminations and other actions. The total amount of the charges incurred in connection with the plan was $645.6 ($446.5, net of tax), of which $592.8 was recorded in the third quarter with the remainder having been recorded through the end of the second quarter. mately 6,800 employees who have been, or will be, terminated. As of December 31, 2001, approximately 5,200 of those identified had been terminated. The remaining employees are expected to be terminated by the middle of the year 2002. A significant portion of severance liabilities are expected to be paid out over a period of up to one year. The employee groups affected include all levels and functions across the Company: executive, regional and account management, administrative, creative and media production personnel. Approximately half of the 6,800 headcount reductions relate to the U.S., one third relate to Europe (principally the UK, France and Germany), with the remainder relating to Latin America and Asia Pacific. Lease termination costs, net of estimated sublease income, relate to the offices that have been or will be vacated as part of the restructuring. The Company plans to downsize or vacate approximately 180 locations and expects that all leases will have been terminated or subleased by the middle of the year 2002; however, the cash portion of the charge will be paid out over a period of up to five years. The geographical distribution of offices to be vacated is similar to the geographical distribution of the severance charges. Lease termination and related costs include write-offs related to the abandonment of leasehold improvements as part of the office vacancies. Other exit costs relate principally to the impairment loss on sale or closing of certain business units in the U.S. and Europe. In the aggregate, the businesses being sold or closed represent an immaterial portion of the revenue and operating profit of the Company. The write-off amount was computed based upon the difference between the estimated sales proceeds (if any) and the carrying value of the related assets. Approximately one half of the sales or closures had occurred by December 2001, with the remaining to occur by the middle of the year 2002. The transaction costs relate to the direct costs incurred in connection with the True North acquisition and included investment banker and other professional services fees. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 21 Financial Statements MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) 2000 ACTIVITIES During 2000, the Company recorded restructuring and other merger related costs of $177.7 ($124.3, net of tax). Of the total pre-tax restructuring and other merger related costs, cash charges represented $104.6. The key components of the charge were: a) costs associated with the restructuring of Lowe & Partners Worldwide (formerly Lowe Lintas & Partners Worldwide), b) costs associated with the loss, by True North, of the Chrysler account, c) other costs related to the acquisition of Deutsch and d) costs related principally to the merger with NFO. LOWE & PARTNERS In October 1999, the Company announced the merger of two of its advertising networks. The networks affected, Lowe & Partners Worldwide and Ammirati Puris Lintas, were combined to form a new agency. The merger involved the consolidation of operations in agencies in approximately 24 cities in 22 countries around the world and the severance of approximately 600 employees. As of September 30, 2000, all restructuring activities had been completed. In connection with this restructuring, costs of $84.1 ($51.4, net of tax) were recorded in 1999 and $87.8 ($53.6, net of tax) in 2000. Of the totals, $75.6 related to severance, $50.2 related to lease related costs and the remainder related principally to investment write-offs. No adjustment to the Company’s statement of operations was required as a result of the completion of the restructuring plan. LOSS OF CHRYSLER ACCOUNT In September 2000, Chrysler, one of True North’s larger accounts, announced that it was undertaking a review of its two advertising agencies to reduce the costs of its global advertising and media. On November 3, 2000, True North was informed that it was not selected as the agency of record. In December 2000, True North terminated its existing contract with Chrysler and entered into a transition agreement effective January 1, 2001. As a result of the loss of the Chrysler account, the Company recorded a charge of $17.5 pre-tax ($10.0, net of tax) in the fourth quarter of 2000. The charge covered primarily severance, lease termination and other exit costs associated with the decision to close the Detroit office. The severance portion of the charge amounted to $5.8 and reflected the elimination of approximately 250 positions. The charge also included $11.4 associated primarily with the lease termination of the Detroit office, as well as other exit costs. In addition, an impairment loss of $5.5 was recorded for intangible assets that were deter- mined to be no longer recoverable. Offsetting these charges was a $5.2 payment from Chrysler to compensate the Company for severance and other exit costs. As of December 31, 2001, all actions had been completed. No adjustment to the Company’s statement of operations was required as a result of the completion of these actions. 22 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements ACQUISITION OF DEUTSCH In connection with the acquisition of Deutsch in 2000, the Company recognized a charge related to one-time transaction costs of $44.7 ($41.7, net of tax). The principal component of this amount related to the expense associated with various equity participation agreements with certain members of management. These agreements provided for participants to receive a portion of the proceeds in the event of the sale or merger of Deutsch. NFO AND OTHER In addition to the above 2000 activities, additional charges, substantially all of which were cash costs, were recorded during 2000 related principally to the transaction and other merger related costs arising from the acquisition of NFO. Also included in 2000 were excess restructuring reserves of $0.6 related to the 1999 restructuring of Bozell and FCB Worldwide. This excess was reversed into income in the Company’s statement of operations during 2000. 1999 ACTIVITIES During 1999, the Company recorded restructuring and other merger related costs of $159.5 ($101.0, net of tax). Of the total pre-tax restructuring and other merger related costs, cash charges represented $91.5. The components of the charge were: a) costs associated with the restructuring of Lowe & Partners Worldwide (see above) and b) costs associated with the restruc- turing of Bozell and FCB Worldwide. BOZELL AND FCB WORLDWIDE In September 1999, the Company announced a formal plan to restructure its Bozell and FCB Worldwide agency operations and recorded a $75.4 charge ($49.6, net of tax) in the third quarter of 1999. The charge covered primarily severance ($41.4) and lease termination and other exit costs ($24.2) in connection with the combination and integration of the two worldwide advertising agency networks. Approximately 640 individuals were terminated as part of the plan. Bozell Worldwide’s international operations, along with Bozell Detroit and Bozell Costa Mesa, were merged with FCB Worldwide and now operate under the FCB Worldwide name. The restructuring initiatives also included the impairment loss on the sale or closing of certain underperforming business units. The activities had been completed by December 31, 2000. GOODWILL IMPAIRMENT AND OTHER CHARGES Following the completion of the True North acquisition and the realignment of certain of the Company’s businesses, the Company evaluated the realizability of various assets. In connection with this review, undiscounted cash flow projections were prepared for certain investments, and the Company determined that the goodwill attributable to certain business units was stated at an amount in excess of the future estimated cashflows. As a result, an impairment charge of $303.1 ($263.4, net of tax) was recorded in 2001. Of the total write-off, $221.4 was recorded in the second quarter, with the remainder recorded in the third quarter. The MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) largest components of the goodwill impairment and other charges were Capita Technologies, Inc. (approximately $145) and Zentropy Partners (approximately $16), both internet services businesses. The remaining amount primarily related to several other businesses including internet services, healthcare consulting and certain advertising offices in Europe and Asia Pacific. See Liquidity and Capital Resources section for description of financing activities. Interest expense increased by $26.8 to $126.3 in 2000 due to higher average debt levels and higher interest rates, which included the issuance and sale of $500.0, 7.875% notes due 2005. INVESTMENT IMPAIRMENT During 2001, the Company recorded total charges related to the impairment of investments of $208.3 ($134.1, net of tax). Of the total amount, $160.1 ($103.7, net of tax) was recorded in the first quarter, with the remainder recorded in the third quarter. The charge in the first quarter related to the impairment of investments primarily in publicly traded internet-related companies, including marchFIRST, Inc. (an internet professional services firm), which had filed for relief under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code in April 2001. The third quarter charge included write-offs for investments in non-internet companies, certain venture funds and other investments. The impairment charge adjusted the carrying value of investments to the estimated market value where an other than temporary impairment had occurred. At December 31, 2001, the Company had approximately $146 of investments, of which approximately $55 are less than 20% owned (and are accounted for on the cost basis), and approximately $91 are available-for-sale securities. OTHER NON-RECURRING ITEMS Included in office and general expenses in 2001 were charges of $85.4 ($49.5, net of tax) relating primarily to operating assets, which are no longer considered realizable. Additionally, a benefit of $50.0 ($29.0, net of tax) resulting from a reduction in severance reserves related to recent significant headcount reductions is included in salaries and related expenses. In 2000, the Company also recorded its share of the asset impairment and restructuring charges of Modem Media. The $25.7 charge is reflected in equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates in the Company’s statement of operations. OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) INTEREST EXPENSE Interest expense increased by $38.3 to $164.6 in 2001 due to higher debt levels, which included the issuance and sale of $500.0, 7.25% notes due 2011 in August 2001. The increase was partially offset by lower interest rates paid on short-term borrowings. The Company’s effective interest rate was benefited by the interest rate swap agreements covering $400.0 of the $500.0, 7.875% notes issued in 2000. The interest rate savings as a result of these agreements was approximately $4.5 in 2001. In addition, the Company expects to further reduce its effective interest rate in 2002 due to the issuance and sale of the Zero-Coupon Convertible Notes in December 2001. INTEREST INCOME Interest income was $43.0 in 2001, $57.5 in 2000 and $56.2 in 1999. The decrease in 2001 is primarily due to lower interest rates and lower average cash balances primarily resulting from the lower earnings levels in 2001. Interest income increased modestly in 2000 from 1999. OTHER INCOME Other income primarily consists of investment income, gains from the sale of businesses and gains (losses) from the sale of investments, primarily marketable securities classified as available-for-sale. Other income decreased by $32.5 in 2001 and by $19.6 in 2000 primarily due to a reduction in the gains from sales of investments, which were a loss of $(2.5), and gains of $28.5 and $45.3 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The year over year reduction reflects the reduced level of the Company’s investment activity. OTHER ITEMS The Company’s effective income tax rate was a benefit of 8.4% in 2001, and an expense of 42.2% in 2000 and 42.5% in 1999. The 2001 effective tax rate was impacted by the non-recurring items, which were benefited at lower foreign tax rates and by the write-off of non-deductible goodwill, resulting in a lower tax benefit rate. Excluding non-recurring items, the effective income tax rate was 42.5%, 40.1% and 41.4%, respectively. The primary difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory federal rate of 35% is due to state and local taxes and nondeductible goodwill expense. The increased tax rate in 2001 reflects a change in the tax status of Deutsch, Inc., which was acquired in November 2000, from “S” Corporation to “C” Corporation status. Income applicable to minority interests decreased by $12.5 to $30.3 in 2001 and increased by $4.6 in 2000. The decrease in 2001 was primarily due to lower operating results of certain operations in Europe and Asia Pacific. The slight increase in 2000 was due to the growth of companies not wholly owned. Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates was $5.4 in 2001, a loss of $14.6 in 2000 and income of $11.0 in 1999. Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates excluding non-recurring items decreased to $5.4 in 2001 from $11.1 in 2000. The decrease was primarily due to reduced earnings of our unconsolidated affiliates and the consolidation of an advertising office in the Middle East at the end of 2000. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 23 Financial Statements MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES At December 31, 2001, cash and cash equivalents were $935.2, an increase of $90.6 from the December 31, 2000 balance of $844.6. The Company collects funds from clients on behalf of media outlets resulting in cash receipts and disbursements at levels substantially exceeding its revenue. Therefore, the working capital amounts reported on its balance sheet and cash flows from operating activities reflect the “pass-through” of these items. Cash flow provided from operating activities, supplemented by seasonal short-term borrowings and long-term credit facilities, finance the operating, acquisition and capital expenditure requirements of the Company, in addition to dividend payments and repurchases of common stock. OPERATING ACTIVITIES Cash flow from operations and borrowings under existing credit facilities, and refinancings thereof, have been the primary sources of the Company’s working capital, and management believes that they will continue to be so in the future. Net cash provided by operating activities was $148.5, $607.2 and $769.4 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The decrease in 2001 was primarily attributa- ble to lower operating profit levels and to severance payments made in connection with the Company’s restructuring plan. The Company’s practice is to bill and collect from its clients in suffi- cient time to pay the amounts due for media on a timely basis. Other uses of working capital include acquisitions, capital expenditures, disbursements for severance and lease terminations related to the Company’s restructuring activities, repurchase of the Company’s common stock and payment of cash dividends. INVESTING ACTIVITIES The Company pursues acquisitions to complement and enhance its service offerings. In addition, the Company seeks to acquire businesses similar to those already owned to expand its geographic scope to better serve new and existing clients. Acquisitions have historically been funded using stock, cash or a combination of both. During 2001, 2000 and 1999 the Company paid $1,729.7, $1,668.3 and $652.2, respectively, in cash and stock for new acquisitions, including a number of specialized marketing and communications services companies to complement its existing agency systems and to optimally position itself in the ever- broadening communications marketplace. This amount includes the value of stock issued for pooled companies and includes cash of $84.7, $577.4 and $231.4 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The Company’s capital expenditures in 2001 were $268.0 compared to $259.5 in 2000 and $249.7 in 1999. The primary purposes of these expenditures were to upgrade computer and telecommunications systems and to modernize offices. The Company’s planned capital expenditures for 2002 are estimated to be no greater than the level of spending in 2001. During 2001, the Company sold a marketing services affiliate in Europe for approximately $5 and some non-core marketing services affiliates in the U.S. for approximately $6.9. 24 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements During 2000, the Company sold its interest in a non-core minority owned marketing services business for proceeds of approximately $12. During 1999, the Company sold its entire investment in Publicis S.A. for net cash proceeds of $135.3 and a portion of its investments in the common stock of Lycos and marchFIRST (formerly USWEB) for combined proceeds of approximately $56. Additionally, the Company sold its minority interest in Nicholson NY, Inc. to Icon in exchange for shares of Icon’s common stock worth $19. FINANCING ACTIVITIES Total debt at December 31, 2001 was $2,933.7, an increase of $852.6 from December 31, 2000. The increase in debt was primarily attributable to lower operating profit levels and to severance payments made in connection with the Company’s restructuring plan. ZERO-COUPON CONVERTIBLE NOTES In December 2001, the Company completed the issuance and sale of approximately $702 of aggregate principal amount of Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes (“Zero-Coupon Notes”) due 2021. The Company used the net proceeds of $563.5 from this offering to repay indebtedness under the Company’s credit facilities. The Zero-Coupon Notes are unsecured, zero-coupon, senior securities that may be converted into common shares if the price of the Company’s common stock reaches a specified threshold, at a conversion rate of 22.8147 shares per one thousand dollars principal amount at maturity, subject to adjustment. This threshold will initially be 120% of the accreted value of a Zero-Coupon Note, divided by the conversion rate and will decline 1/2% each year until it reaches 110% at maturity in 2021. A Zero-Coupon Note’s accreted value is the sum of its issue price plus its accrued original issue discount. The Zero-Coupon Notes may also be converted, regardless of the sale price of the Company’s common stock, at any time after: (i) the credit rating assigned to the Zero-Coupon Notes by any two of Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group and Fitch IBCA Duff & Phelps are Bal, BB+ and BB+, respectively, or lower, or the Zero-Coupon Notes are no longer rated by at least two of these ratings services, (ii) the Company calls the Zero-Coupon Notes for redemption, (iii) the Company makes specified distributions to shareholders or (iv) the Company becomes a party to a consolidation, merger or binding share exchange pursuant to which our common stock would be converted into cash or property (other than securities). The Company, at the investor’s option, may be required to redeem the Zero-Coupon Notes for cash on December 14, 2003. The Company may also be required to redeem the Zero- Coupon Notes at the investor’s option, on December 14, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2011 or 2016 for cash or common stock or a combination of both, at the Company’s election. Additionally, the Company has the option of redeeming the Zero-Coupon Notes after December 14, 2006 for cash. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) The yield to maturity of the Zero-Coupon Notes at the date of issuance was 1%. Unless the Company is required to pay the contingent interest described in the following sentence or the U.S. tax laws change in certain ways, no cash interest will be paid at any time. After December 14, 2006, if the Company’s stock price reaches specified thresholds, the Company would be obligated to pay semi-annual contingent cash interest which would approximate the dividends paid to common stockholders during the prior six-month period (subject to a floor rate). Further, in the event that the notes are not registered for public sale by May 13, 2002, additional amounts of up to 0.5% per annum would be payable until the registration is declared effective by the SEC. SENIOR UNSECURED NOTES — 7.25% On August 22, 2001, the Company completed the issuance and sale of $500.0 principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2011. The notes bear interest at a rate of 7.25% per annum. The Company used the net proceeds of approximately $493 from the sale of the notes to repay outstanding indebtedness under its credit facilities. SENIOR UNSECURED NOTES — 7.875% On October 20, 2000, the Company completed the issuance and sale of $500.0 principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2005. The notes bear an interest rate of 7.875% per annum. The Company used the net proceeds of approximately $496 from the sale of the notes to repay outstanding indebtedness under its credit facilities. During 2001, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to convert the fixed interest rate on the 7.875% notes to a variable rate based on 6 month LIBOR. At December 31, 2001, the Company had outstanding interest rate swap agreements covering $400.0 of the $500.0, 7.875% notes due October 2005. The swaps have the same term as the 7.875% notes and, for 2001, had the effect of reducing the effective interest rate on the notes to 6.972%. CREDIT AGREEMENTS In July 2001, the Company entered into a credit agreement with a group of lenders. The credit agreement provided for revolving borrowings of up to $750.0. No borrowings were drawn under this facility and the facility terminated upon the issuance and sale of the $500.0 Senior Notes on August 22, 2001. On June 26, 2001, the Company replaced its maturing $375.0, 364-day syndicated revolving multi-currency credit agreement with a substantially similar $500.0 facility. The new facility bears interest at variable rates based on either LIBOR or a bank’s base rate, at the Company’s option. As of December 31, 2001, there were no outstanding balances under this facility. Prior to June 25, 2002, the Company may, at its option, borrow the full amount of the $500.0 facility for a one-year term. In June 2000, the Company entered into a five-year syndicated revolving multi-currency credit agreement with a group of lenders. The credit agreement provides for borrowings of up to $375.0 which bear interest at variable rates based on LIBOR or a bank’s base rate, at the Company’s option. At December 31, 2001, there was approximately $144.1 borrowed under this facility. The Company’s bank-provided revolving credit agreements include financial covenants that set maximum levels of debt as a function of EBITDA and minimum levels of EBITDA as a function of interest expense (as defined in these agreements). The financial covenants contained in the Company’s term loan agreements set minimum levels for net worth and for cash flow as a function of borrowed funds and maximum levels of borrowed funds as a function of net worth (as defined in these agreements). At December 31, 2001, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants, with the most restrictive being that of cash flow to borrowed funds, the ratio of which is required to exceed .25 to 1. During 2001, as a result of the significant non-recurring charges, the Company required and received amendments related to its financial covenants. FLOATING RATE NOTES On June 28, 2001, the Company issued and sold $100.0 of floating rate notes. The notes mature on June 28, 2002 and bear interest at a variable rate based on three month LIBOR. The Company intends to repay these notes at maturity from its available borrowing capacity. OTHER During 2001, the Company purchased approximately 2.4 million shares of its common stock, compared to 4.8 million shares in 2000. Since July 2001, the Company has not repurchased its common stock in the open market as its current holdings of treasury shares are sufficient to meet its needs for various compensation plans. The Company has paid cash dividends at a quarterly rate of $0.095 per share since the second quarter of 2000, when it was increased from $0.085 per share. The determination of dividend payments is made by the Company’s Board of Directors on a quarterly basis. The Company anticipates that the payment of dividends will continue to be at levels similar to the levels in 2001. Based on current demand for the Company’s services and the global economic environment, the Company believes that its cash flow from operations, together with its existing lines of credit and cash on hand, is sufficient to provide for the liquidity needs of its business. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the Company’s committed credit facilities were approximately $875 and $750, respectively, of which $144.1 and $160.0 were utilized at December 31, 2001 and 2000. In addition, the Company has had success in the past accessing the debt markets for increased liquidity. Unanticipated decreases in cash flow from operations as a result of decreased demand for our services and other developments, including those described in the “Cautionary Statement” below, may require the Company to seek other sources of liquidity and modify its operating strategies. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 25 Financial Statements MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) The Company is currently engaged in preliminary discussions and expects to renew its 364-day, $500.0 bank facility which matures in June 2002. At December 31, 2001, there were no borrowings under this facility. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS The following summarizes the Company’s estimated contractual obligations at December 31, 2001, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on its liquidity and cash flow in future periods. TOTAL LESS THAN 1 YEAR 1-3 YEARS AFTER 3 YEARS HEDGES OF NET INVESTMENT The Company has significant foreign operations and conducts business in various foreign currencies. In order to hedge the value of its investment in Europe, the Company has designated approximately 125 million Euro of borrowings under its $375.0 syndicated revolving multi-currency credit facility as a hedge of this net investment. Changes in the spot rate of the debt instruments designated as hedges of the net investment in a foreign subsidiary are reflected in the cumulative translation adjustment component of stockholders’ equity. As of December 31, 2001, the reduction in stockholders’ equity related to this item was approximately $5. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS: Long-term debt Non-cancelable operating $2,515.2 $ 34.6 $318.9 $2,161.7 FORWARD CONTRACTS SHORT-TERM The Company has entered into foreign currency transactions in which foreign currencies (principally the Euro, Pounds Sterling and the Japanese Yen) are bought or sold forward. The contracts were entered into to meet currency requirements arising from specific transactions. The changes in value of these forward contracts were reflected in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had contracts covering approximately $50 of notional amount of currency. Substantially all of these contracts expire by the end of February 2002. As of December 31, 2001, the fair value of the forwards was a loss of $0.2. LONG-TERM In September 2000, the Company acquired a 35.5% interest in Springer & Jacoby, a German-based advertising group, for total consideration of $25.9. The consideration consisted of an initial cash payment of $16.9 and a put option valued at $9.0. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, two shareholders of Springer & Jacoby have the right to sell all of their shares (put option) to the Company in January 2003 at a fixed price of 27.1 million Euros. The additional shares to be purchased in January 2003 pursuant to the put option represent 15.5% of the outstanding shares of Springer & Jacoby. The Company has recorded the fair value of this put option as an $8.3 liability at December 31, 2001. The Company has entered into forward contracts to purchase 27.1 million Euros in January 2003. The fair value of the forward contracts was recorded as an asset of $1.0 at December 31, 2001. Changes in the fair value of the put option liability and the forward contracts are reflected as a component of the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. lease obligations $1,552.9 $314.1 $400.2 $ 838.6 Estimated obligations under acquisition earn-outs $ 380.0 $150.0 $230.0 $ – The amount reflected as obligations under acquisition earn-outs is estimated based on the assumption that the full amount due under the acquisition agreements would be paid, however, the Company does not expect to pay out the full amount estimated. As noted above, the Company’s Zero-Coupon Notes contain a provision whereby the Company may be required to redeem the Zero-Coupon Notes for cash on December 14, 2003. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES The Company enters into interest rate swaps, hedges of net investment in overseas subsidiaries and forward contracts to mitigate related risks. INTEREST RATE SWAPS At December 31, 2001, the Company had outstanding interest rate swap agreements covering $400.0 of the $500.0, 7.875% notes due October 2005. The swaps have the same term as the debt and effectively convert the fixed rate on the debt to a variable rate based on 6 month LIBOR. The swaps are accounted for as hedges of the fair value of the related debt and are recorded as an asset or liability as appropriate. As of December 31, 2001, the fair value of the hedges was an asset of $10. The net effect of the hedges is that interest expense on the $400.0 of debt being hedged is recorded at variable rates, which for 2001 resulted in the effective interest rate on the $500.0, 7.875% notes being reduced to 6.972%. The fair value is estimated based on quotes from the market makers of these instruments and represents the estimated amounts that the Company would expect to receive if these agreements were terminated. These instruments were executed with institutions the Company believes to be credit-worthy. 26 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS The Company assesses the required amount of allowance for doubtful accounts based on past experience and reviews of aging and analysis of specific accounts. While the expense for bad debts has historically fluctuated in line with revenue, it is not certain that past experience will continue. ACCOUNTING FOR INCOME TAXES As part of the process of preparing its consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate income taxes payable in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This process involves estimating the actual current tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. The Company then assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent it is determined that recovery is not likely, a valuation allowance is established. Significant management judgement is required in determining the provision for income taxes and the amount of valuation allowance that would be required. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or the Company adjusts these estimates in future periods, the Company may need to establish an additional valuation allowance which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations. VALUATION OF LONG-LIVED AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS, INVESTMENTS AND GOODWILL The Company has a significant amount of long-lived assets, including fixed assets, investments, goodwill and other intangibles. The Company periodically evaluates the realizability of all of its long-lived assets. Future events could cause the Company to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that the asset values associated with a given operation have become impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. OTHER Under the terms of the offering of Zero-Coupon Convertible Notes in December 2001, two embedded derivative instruments were created. The derivatives are related to: a) the value of the contingent interest feature (whereby cash interest may become payable in certain circumstances) and, b) the value of the feature that the debt becomes convertible upon a reduction in the credit rating of the Notes. The Company obtained valuations of the two derivatives at the time of initial issuance of the Notes and determined that the fair value of the two derivatives was negligible. At December 31, 2001, the fair value of the two derivatives was negligible. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The Company believes the following accounting policies are critical to the accuracy of the more significant judgements and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements: (cid:2) revenue recognition; (cid:2) allowance for doubtful accounts; (cid:2) accounting for income taxes; and (cid:2) valuation of long-lived and intangible assets, investments and goodwill. REVENUE RECOGNITION The Company derives revenue from advertising services, including media buying, and from marketing and communication services, including market research, public relations, direct marketing, sales promotion and event marketing activities. The Company’s advertising services revenue is derived from commissions that are earned when the media is placed, from fees earned as advertising services are performed and from production services rendered. In addition, incentive amounts may be earned based on qualitative and/or quantitative criteria. In the case of commissions, revenue is recognized as the media placements appear. In the case of fee and production arrange- ments, the revenue is recognized as the services are performed which is generally ratably over the period of the client contract. The Company’s marketing service revenues are generally earned on a fee basis, and in certain cases incentive amounts may also be earned. As with fee arrangements in advertising, such revenue is recognized as the work is performed. Incentive amounts are recognized upon satisfaction of the relevant qualitative and quantitative criteria. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 27 Financial Statements MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) In June 2001, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” (“SFAS 143”) was issued. SFAS 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated retirement costs that result from the acquisition, construction, or development and normal operation of a long-lived asset. Upon initial recognition of a liability for an asset retirement obligation, SFAS 143 requires an increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The asset retirement cost is subsequently allocated to expense using a systematic and rational method over the assets useful life. SFAS 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. In August 2001, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”) was issued. SFAS 144 supersedes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-lived Assets to be Disposed of ”, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations- Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently occurring Events and Transactions”. SFAS 144 also amends ARB (Accounting Research Bulletins) No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements”, to eliminate the exception to consolidation for a subsidiary for which control is likely to be temporary. SFAS 144 retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS 121 for recognizing and measuring impairment losses on long-lived assets held for use and long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, while resolving significant implementation issues associated with SFAS 121. Among other things, SFAS 144 provides guidance on how long-lived assets used as part of a group should be evaluated for impairment, establishes criteria for when long-lived assets are held for sale, and prescribes the accounting for long-lived assets that will be disposed of other than by sale. SFAS 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. OTHER MATTERS ARGENTINA As a result of the devaluation of the Argentine peso in recent months, the Company’s cumulative translation adjustment balance for its Argentine operation reflected a reduction in stockholders’ equity of approximately $10 at December 31, 2001. The Company expects to maintain its strategic investment in Argentina for the long-term and further anticipates that its Argentine operations will remain profitable. Accordingly, the Company does not currently consider its investment in Argentina to be permanently impaired. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In June 2001, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations’’ (“SFAS 141”), and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets’’ (“SFAS 142”) were issued. SFAS 141 requires that companies use the purchase method of accounting for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and addresses the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination. SFAS 142 addresses the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets acquired outside a business combination and the recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to acquisition. Under the new standards, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives will no longer be amortized but, instead, will be tested at least annually for impairment. Other intangible assets will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The Company will adopt the new standards on accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets effective January 1, 2002. Upon adoption, the Company will cease amortizing the remaining amount of unamortized goodwill. As of December 31, 2001, the Company’s remaining unamortized goodwill balance was $3,004.7. Although the Company is still reviewing the provisions of the Statements, it is management’s preliminary assessment that no goodwill impairment will be recognized upon adoption of the new standard. Further, the Company does not anticipate any significant reclassifications of amounts reflected on its balance sheet as a result of the adoption of the standard. Although SFAS 142 does not require that previously reported numbers be restated, the following table sets forth the effect on reported results of adopting SFAS 142: 2001 2000 1999 Net income (loss), as reported Add back amortization of goodwill Less related tax effect $(505.3) 169.0 (24.3) $420.3 140.4 (17.2) $359.4 122.8 (15.0) Net income (loss), as adjusted $(360.6) $543.5 $467.2 28 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) CONVERSION TO THE EURO On January 1, 1999, certain member countries of the European Union established fixed conversion rates between their existing currencies and the European Union’s common currency (the “Euro”). The Company conducts business in member countries. The transition period for the introduction of the Euro will end on June 30, 2002. The Company believes it has addressed the major issues involved with the introduction of the Euro which were: converting information technology systems, reassessing currency risk, negotiating and amending contracts and processing tax and accounting records. The Company believes that use of the Euro will not have a significant impact on the manner in which it conducts its business affairs and processes its business and accounting records. Accordingly, conversion to the Euro has not and is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK The Company is exposed to market risk related to interest rates and foreign currencies. INTEREST RATES At December 31, 2001, a significant portion of the Company’s debt obligations were at fixed interest rates. Accordingly, assuming the fixed rate debt is not refinanced, there would be no impact on interest expense or cash flow from either a 10% increase or decrease in market rates of interest. The fair market value of the debt obligations would decrease by $24 if market rates were to increase by 10% and would increase by $26 if market rates were to decrease by 10%. For that portion of the debt that is either maintained at variable rates or is swapped into variable rates, based on amounts and rates outstanding at December 31, 2001, the change in interest expense and cash flow from a 10% change in rates would be approximately $5. FOREIGN CURRENCIES The Company faces two risks related to foreign currency exchange: translation risk and transaction risk. Amounts invested in the Company’s foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the stockholders’ equity section of the balance sheet. The Company’s foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in currencies other than the United States dollar. Since the functional currency of the Company’s foreign operations is generally the local currency, foreign currency translation of the balance sheet is reflected as a component of stockholders’ equity and does not impact operating results. Revenues and expenses in foreign currencies translate into varying amounts of U.S. dollars depending upon whether the U.S. dollar weakens or strengthens against other currencies. Therefore, changes in exchange rates may negatively affect the Company’s consolidated revenues and expenses (as expressed in U.S. dollars) from foreign operations. Currency transaction gains or losses arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in results of operations. The Company has generally not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements. Statements in this Annual Report that are not historical facts, including statements about the Company’s beliefs and expectations, particularly regarding recent business and economic trends, the integration of acquisitions and restructuring costs, constitute forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current plans, expectations, estimates and projections, and you should therefore not place undue reliance on them. Forward- looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any of them in light of new information or future events. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward- looking statement. Such factors include, but are not limited to, those associated with the effect of national and regional economic conditions, the ability of the Company to attract new clients and retain existing clients, the financial success of the Company’s clients, developments from changes in the regulatory and legal environment for advertising companies around the world, and the successful completion and integration of acquisitions which complement and expand our business capabilities. This Annual Report also contains certain financial information calculated on a “pro forma” basis (including information that is restated to exclude the impact of specified historical events). Because “pro forma” financial information by its very nature departs from traditional accounting conventions, such information should not be viewed as a substitute for the information prepared in accordance with GAAP contained in the Company’s financial statements that are contained in this Annual Report and should be read in conjunction therewith. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 29 Financial Statements REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP New York, New York February 28, 2002 To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, of cash flows, and of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of NFO Worldwide, Inc. (“NFO”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, which statements reflect total revenues constituting approximately 7% of the related 1999 consolidated financial statement total. We did not audit the financial statements of Deutsch, Inc. and Subsidiary and Affiliates (“Deutsch”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, which statements reflect total net loss constituting approximately 2% of the related 2000 consolidated financial statement total and total net income constituting approximately 4% of the related 1999 consolidated financial statement total. Additionally, we did not audit the financial statements of True North Communications Inc. (“True North”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, which statements reflect total revenues constituting approximately 22% of the related consoli- dated financial statement totals for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2000. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose reports thereon have been furnished to us, and our opinion expressed herein, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for NFO, Deutsch and True North, is based solely on the reports of the other auditors. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 30 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) 2001 2000 1999 $6,726.8 $7,182.7 $6,417.2 3,787.1 2,026.1 173.0 645.6 303.1 6,934.9 4,035.2 1,976.4 144.3 177.7 – 6,333.6 3,617.4 1,862.5 128.4 159.5 – 5,767.8 (208.1) 849.1 649.4 (164.6) 43.0 13.7 (208.3) (316.2) (524.3) (43.9) (480.4) (30.3) 5.4 (126.3) 57.5 46.2 – (22.6) 826.5 348.8 477.7 (42.8) (14.6) (99.5) 56.2 65.8 – 22.5 671.9 285.3 386.6 (38.2) 11.0 $ (505.3) $ 420.3 $ 359.4 $ $ (1.37) (1.37) 369.0 369.0 0.38 $ $ $ 1.17 1.14 359.6 370.6 0.37 $ $ $ 1.02 0.99 352.0 364.6 0.33 $ Year Ended December 31 REVENUE OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries and related expenses Office and general expenses Amortization of intangible assets Restructuring and other merger related costs Goodwill impairment and other charges Total operating expenses OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): Interest expense Interest income Other income Investment impairment Total other income (expense) Income (loss) before provision for (benefit of) income taxes Provision for (benefit of) income taxes Income (loss) of consolidated companies Income applicable to minority interests Equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates NET INCOME (LOSS) Earnings (loss) per share: Basic EPS Diluted EPS Weighted average shares: Basic Diluted Cash dividends per share The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 31 Financial Statements 2001 2000 $ 935.2 $ 844.6 4,780.5 333.0 80.0 338.5 6,467.2 5,735.7 437.9 – 277.8 7,296.0 161.1 1,085.8 461.4 1,708.3 (858.0) 850.3 174.1 1,103.7 427.8 1,705.6 (879.2) 826.4 165.0 492.8 432.5 178.9 380.3 525.4 3,106.9 3,155.0 4,197.2 4,239.6 $11,514.7 $12,362.0 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) December 31 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and cash equivalents (includes certificates of deposit: 2001 – $93.8; 2000 – $110.9) Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts: 2001 – $90.7; 2000 – $85.7) Expenditures billable to clients Deferred taxes on income Prepaid expenses and other current assets Total current assets FIXED ASSETS, AT COST: Land and buildings Furniture and equipment Leasehold improvements Less: accumulated depreciation Total fixed assets OTHER ASSETS: Investment in unconsolidated affiliates Deferred taxes on income Other assets and miscellaneous investments Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization: 2001 – $1,024.8; 2000 – $861.5) Total other assets TOTAL ASSETS 32 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements December 31 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES: Accounts payable Accrued expenses Accrued income taxes Dividends payable Short-term bank borrowings Current portion of long-term debt Total current liabilities NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES: Long-term debt Convertible subordinated notes Zero-coupon convertible senior notes Deferred compensation Accrued postretirement benefits Other non-current liabilities Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries Total non-current liabilities Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: Preferred stock, no par value, shares authorized: 20.0, shares issued: none Common stock, $0.10 par value, shares authorized: 550.0, shares issued: 2001 – 385.8; 2000 – 377.3 Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax Less: Treasury stock, at cost: 2001 – 7.3 shares; 2000 – 5.5 shares Unamortized deferred compensation Total stockholders’ equity TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) 2001 2000 $ 4,525.2 1,316.5 103.1 36.0 418.5 34.6 $ 5,751.3 1,081.7 210.3 29.4 483.8 65.5 6,433.9 7,622.0 1,356.8 548.5 575.3 376.7 54.4 100.5 89.3 3,101.5 38.6 1,785.2 1,011.2 (451.5) 2,383.5 (290.2) (114.0) 998.7 533.1 – 464.3 55.2 105.7 100.6 2,257.6 37.7 1,514.7 1,667.5 (411.6) 2,808.3 (194.8) (131.1) 1,979.3 2,482.4 $11,514.7 $12,362.0 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 33 Financial Statements CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Amounts in Millions) Year Ended December 31 2001 2000 1999 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities: $ (505.3) $ 420.3 $ 359.4 Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets Amortization of intangible assets Amortization of restricted stock awards and bond discounts Provision for (benefit of) deferred income taxes Undistributed equity losses (earnings) Income applicable to minority interests Restructuring costs, non-cash Investment impairment Goodwill impairment and other Other net (gains) losses Change in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: Accounts receivable Expenditures billable to clients Prepaid expenses and other current assets Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities Accrued income taxes Other non-current assets and liabilities Net cash provided by operating activities CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Acquisitions, net of cash acquired Capital expenditures Proceeds from sales of businesses Proceeds from sales of long-term investments Purchase of long-term investments Maturities of short-term marketable securities Purchases of short-term marketable securities Other investments and miscellaneous assets Investment in unconsolidated affiliates Net cash used in investing activities CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Increase (decrease) in short-term bank borrowings Proceeds from long-term debt Payments of long-term debt Treasury stock acquired Issuance of common stock Proceeds from IPO of subsidiary Cash dividends — Interpublic Cash dividends — pooled companies Net cash provided by financing activities Deconsolidation of subsidiary Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents at end of year SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION Cash paid for interest Cash paid for income taxes The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 34 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements 199.1 173.0 79.1 (191.2) 1.5 30.3 104.3 208.3 275.6 (5.6) 780.6 84.6 (106.4) (896.0) (97.0) 13.6 148.5 (310.6) (268.0) 18.9 36.8 (29.4) 85.3 (79.7) (142.2) (7.6) (696.5) (670.6) 1,804.7 (281.8) (118.0) 85.6 – (129.2) (15.2) 675.5 – (36.9) 90.6 844.6 192.6 144.3 60.5 (20.2) 14.6 42.8 73.1 – – (32.0) (230.6) (30.0) (56.6) 13.1 (13.1) 28.4 607.2 (670.1) (259.5) 12.1 83.9 (147.9) 98.3 (101.4) (95.0) (12.5) (1,092.1) 105.8 1,013.9 (521.8) (248.1) 60.0 – (109.1) (44.3) 256.4 (29.1) (45.1) (302.7) 1,147.3 168.0 128.4 42.9 14.6 (10.4) 38.2 68.0 – – (47.7) (928.5) (24.4) (8.3) 1,004.6 (64.4) 29.0 769.4 (318.6) (249.7) – 268.2 (133.9) 25.8 (51.7) (54.2) (11.1) (525.2) 50.0 433.9 (111.1) (313.4) 91.5 42.0 (90.4) (43.3) 59.2 – (46.0) 257.4 889.9 $ 935.2 $ 844.6 $1,147.3 $ 122.5 $ 231.1 $ 88.7 $ 274.5 $ 72.0 $ 239.2 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Amounts in Millions) For the Three Year Period Ended December 31, 2001 COMMON STOCK NUMBER OF SHARES AMOUNT (PAR VALUE $.10) ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL ACCUMULATED OTHER RETAINED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) EARNINGS UNAMORTIZED EXPENSE OF RESTRICTED STOCK GRANTS TREASURY STOCK TOTAL BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AS PREVIOUSLY REPORTED Pooling of interests transaction BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AS RESTATED 310.0 51.3 361.3 $31.0 $ 597.6 $1,166.8 $(161.0) $(132.7) $(71.3) $1,430.4 5.1 36.1 297.7 895.3 18.0 (7.9) – – 312.9 1,184.8 (168.9) (132.7) (71.3) 1,743.3 Comprehensive income: Net income Adjustment for minimum pension liability Change in market value of securities available-for-sale (net of reclassifications) Foreign currency translation adjustment Total comprehensive income Dividends Awards of stock under Company plans: Achievement stock and incentive awards Restricted stock, net of forfeitures and amortization Employee stock purchases Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit Purchase of Company’s own stock Issuance of shares for acquisitions Par value of shares issued for two-for-one split Equity adjustments — pooled companies Other 18.6 154.8 (100.8) 359.4 (137.2) (.2) (.5) (7.6) .3 (7.9) (300.5) 127.9 359.4 18.6 154.8 (100.8) 432.0 (137.2) 6.5 26.7 19.1 116.7 (300.5) 200.4 – 4.0 15.3 1.0 6.1 2.1 1.1 .1 .6 .2 .1 6.2 42.1 19.1 116.1 72.5 4.5 15.2 BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 371.6 $37.1 $1,171.0 $1,406.3 $ (96.3) $(312.9) $ (78.9) $2,126.3 Comprehensive income: Net income Change in market value of securities available-for-sale (net of reclassifications) Foreign currency translation adjustment Total comprehensive income Dividends Awards of stock under Company plans: Achievement stock and incentive awards Restricted stock, net of forfeitures and amortization Employee stock purchases Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit Purchase of Company’s own stock Issuance of shares for acquisitions Tax impact of Deutsch acquisition Equity adjustments — pooled companies Other 1.8 1.0 2.9 .2 .1 .3 $ 420.3 $ 420.3 (224.2) (91.1) (158.9) (.2) .9 90.8 22.0 84.0 43.9 94.9 1.1 6.1 .2 6.2 (52.2) (236.8) 348.5 (224.2) (91.1) 105.0 (158.9) 1.1 45.0 22.1 84.3 (236.8) 392.4 94.9 .9 6.1 BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2000 377.3 $37.7 $1,514.7 $1,667.5 $(411.6) $(194.8) $(131.1) $2,482.4 Comprehensive income: Net loss Adjustment for minimum pension liability Change in market value of securities available-for-sale (net of reclassifications) Foreign currency translation adjustment Total comprehensive income Dividends Awards of stock under Company plans: Restricted stock, net of forfeitures and amortization Employee stock purchases Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit Purchase of Company’s own stock Issuance of shares for acquisitions Equity adjustments — pooled companies Other $ (505.3) (151.0) (5.4) 55.1 (89.6) .8 1.0 3.8 2.9 .1 .1 .4 .3 37.4 19.6 129.4 56.8 26.0 1.3 (.9) 17.1 (123.7) 29.2 $ (505.3) (5.4) 55.1 (89.6) (545.2) (151.0) 53.7 19.7 129.8 (123.7) 86.3 26.0 1.3 BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2001 385.8 $38.6 $1,785.2 $1,011.2 $(451.5) $(290.2) $(114.0) $1,979.3 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 35 Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES NATURE OF OPERATIONS The Company is a worldwide global marketing services company, providing clients with communications expertise in four broad areas: a) advertising and media management, b) marketing communications, which includes client relationship management (direct marketing), public relations, sales promotion, on-line marketing and healthcare marketing, c) marketing intelligence, which includes custom marketing research, brand consultancy and database management and d) marketing services, which includes sports and entertainment marketing, corporate meetings and events, retail marketing and other marketing and business services. The Company is organized into four global operating groups. Three of these groups, McCann-Erickson WorldGroup, the FCB Group and The Partnership, are global marketing communications companies that provide a full complement of global marketing services and marketing communication services. The fourth global operating group, Advanced Marketing Services, focuses on expanding the Company’s operations in the area of specialized marketing communications and services. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, most of which are wholly owned. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The Company also has certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates that are carried on the equity basis. The Company’s consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, have been restated as of the earliest period presented to include the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of transactions accounted for as poolings of interest. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INVESTMENTS Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments, including certificate of deposits, government securities and time deposits, with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase and are stated at estimated fair value which approximates cost. The Company classifies its existing marketable securities as available-for-sale in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” These securities are carried at fair value with the corresponding unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of comprehensive income. The cost of securities sold is determined based upon the average cost of the securities sold. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent 36 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. TRANSLATION OF FOREIGN CURRENCIES The financial statements of the Company’s foreign operations, when the local currency is the functional currency, are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at each year end for assets and liabilities and average exchange rates during each year for the results of operations. The related unrealized gains or losses from translation are reported as a separate component of comprehensive income. The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries located in highly inflationary economies are remeasured as if the functional currency were the U.S. dollar. The related remeasurement adjustments are included as a component of operating expenses. REVENUE RECOGNITION The Company derives revenue from advertising services, including media buying, and from marketing and communication services, including market research, public relations, direct marketing, sales promotion and event marketing activities. The Company’s advertising services revenue is derived from commissions that are earned when the media is placed, from fees earned as advertising services are performed and from production services rendered. In addition, incentive amounts may be earned based on qualitative and/or quantitative criteria. In the case of commissions, revenue is recognized as the media placements appear. In the case of fee and production arrange- ments, the revenue is recognized as the services are performed which is generally ratably over the period of the client contract. The Company’s marketing service revenue is generally earned on a fee basis, and in certain cases incentive amounts may also be earned. As with fee arrangements in advertising, such revenue is recognized as the work is performed. Incentive amounts are recognized upon satisfaction of the relevant qualitative and quantitative criteria. EXPENDITURES BILLABLE TO CLIENTS Expenditures billable to clients include costs incurred primarily in connection with production work by the Company on behalf of clients that have not yet been billed to clients. Commissions and fees on such production work are recorded as revenue when earned. PROPERTY AND DEPRECIATION The cost of property and equipment is depreciated generally using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from 3 to 20 years for furniture and equipment and from 10 to 45 years for the component parts of buildings. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized over the shorter of the life of the asset or the lease term. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) LONG-LIVED ASSETS Long-lived assets, consisting primarily of property and equipment and intangible assets arising from business purchase combinations, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate their carrying value may not be recoverable. When such events or circumstances arise, an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows produced by the asset, or the appropriate grouping of assets, is compared to the asset’s carrying value to determine if an impairment exists pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of.” If the asset is determined to be impaired, the impairment loss is measured based on the excess of its carrying value over its fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of its carrying value or net realizable value. Intangible assets, principally goodwill and customer lists, have been amortized using the straight-line method over periods not exceeding 40 years. In June 2001, SFAS No. 141 (“SFAS 141”), “Business Combinations’’, and SFAS No. 142 (“SFAS 142”), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets’’ were issued. SFAS No. 141 requires that companies use the purchase method of accounting for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and addresses the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination. SFAS No. 142 addresses the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets acquired outside a business combination and the recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to acquisition. Under the new standards, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives will no longer be amortized but, instead, will be tested at least annually for impairment. Other intangible assets will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The Company will adopt the new standards on accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets effective January 1, 2002. Upon adoption, the Company will cease amortizing the remaining amount of unamortized goodwill. As of December 31, 2001, the Company’s remaining unamortized goodwill bal- ance was $3,004.7. Although the Company is still reviewing the provisions of the Statements, it is management’s preliminary assessment that no goodwill impairment will be recognized upon adoption of the new standard. Further, the Company does not anticipate any significant reclassifications of amounts reflected on its balance sheet as a result of the adoption of the standard. In August 2001, SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”) was issued. SFAS 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-lived Assets to be Disposed of”, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently occurring Events and Transactions”. SFAS 144 also amends ARB (Accounting Research Bulletins) No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements”, to eliminate the exception to consolidation for a subsidiary for which control is likely to be temporary. SFAS 144 retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS 121 for recognizing and measuring impairment losses on long-lived assets held for use and long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, while resolving significant implementation issues associated with SFAS 121. Among other things, SFAS 144 provides guidance on how long-lived assets used as part of a group should be evaluated for impairment, establishes criteria for when long-lived assets are held for sale, and prescribes the accounting for long-lived assets that will be disposed of other than by sale. SFAS 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. INCOME TAXES Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the year in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Income taxes are generally not provided on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries because these earnings are considered to be permanently invested. EARNINGS PER SHARE Basic earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year but also include the dilutive effect of stock-based (including stock options and awards to restricted stock) and the assumed conversion, as applicable, of the convertible notes as described in Note 9. TREASURY STOCK In July 1999, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 60 million shares of the Company’s common stock and, specifically, authorized a maximum of 6 million shares be purchased annually. The purchase of treasury shares is accounted for at cost. The reissuance of treasury shares is accounted for on a first-in, first-out basis and any gains or losses are accounted for as additional paid-in capital. Since July 2001, the Company has not made any purchases of treasury shares. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash and cash equiv- alents, accounts receivable, interest rate instruments and foreign exchange contracts. The Company invests its excess cash in investment-grade, short-term securities with financial institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one counterparty. Concentrations of credit risk with accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of clients and the dispersion across different industries and geographical areas. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its clients and maintains an allowance 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 37 Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) for doubtful accounts based upon the expected collectibility of all accounts receivable. The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties of the interest rate swaps and foreign currency contracts. The Company limits its exposure to any one financial institution and does not anticipate nonperformance by these counterparties. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES In June 1998, SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” was issued. SFAS No. 133 established accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at its fair value. SFAS No. 133 requires that changes in the derivative’s fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. SFAS No. 133 was to be effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999. In June 1999, the FASB issued SFAS No. 137, which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 133 by one year. In June 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 138, which amends the accounting and reporting standards of SFAS No. 133 for certain derivative instruments and hedging activities. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 133 effective January 1, 2001. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. See Note 13 for a discussion of the derivative instruments currently outstanding and the associated accounting treatment. In June 2001, SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” (“SFAS 143”) was issued. SFAS 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated retirement costs that result from the acquisition, construction, or development and normal operation of a long-lived asset. Upon initial recognition of a liability for an asset retirement obligation, SFAS 143 requires an increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The asset retirement cost is subsequently allocated to expense using a systematic and rational method over the assets’ useful life. SFAS 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. NOTE 2: EARNINGS PER SHARE The following is a reconciliation of the components of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for income available to common stockholders for the years ended December 31: 2001 2000 1999 (Number of Shares in Millions) INCOME SHARES PER SHARE AMOUNT INCOME SHARES PER SHARE AMOUNT INCOME SHARES PER SHARE AMOUNT BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE Income available to common stockholders Effect of Dilutive Securities: (a)(b) Options Restricted stock $(505.3) 369.0 $(1.37) $420.3 359.6 $1.17 $359.4 352.0 $1.02 – – – – – .6 7.6 3.4 – .6 9.1 3.5 DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE $(505.3) 369.0 $(1.37) $420.9 370.6 $1.14 $360.0 364.6 $0.99 (a) The computation of diluted earnings per share for 2001, 2000 and 1999 excludes the assumed conversion of the 1.87% and 1.80% Convertible Subordinated Notes (see Note 9) because they were antidilutive. The computation of diluted earnings per share for 2001 excludes the weighted average number of incremental shares in connection with stock options and restricted stock because they were antidilutive. (b) The computation of diluted earnings per share for 2001 excludes the assumed conversion of the Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2021 (see Note 9) as they are contingently convertible and assume cash settlement of the put option. NOTE 3: ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS The Company acquired a significant number of advertising and specialized marketing and communications services companies during the three-year period ended December 31, 2001. The aggregate purchase price, including cash and stock payments, was as follows: 2001 – Purchases – Pooling Total 2000 – Purchases – Poolings Total 1999 – Purchases – Poolings Total NUMBER OF ACQUISITIONS 19 1 20 93 3 96 64 5 69 CASH $ 84.7 – $ 84.7 $577.4 – $577.4 $231.4 – $231.4 CONSIDERATION STOCK $ 14.0 1,631.0 $1,645.0 $ 331.9 759.0 $1,090.9 $ 117.6 303.2 $ 420.8 TOTAL $ 98.7 1,631.0 $1,729.7 $ 909.3 759.0 $1,668.3 $ 349.0 303.2 $ 652.2 NO. OF SHARES ISSUED (000s) 500 58,200 58,700 8,000 19,100 27,100 3,100 7,200 10,300 38 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) The value of the stock issued for acquisitions is based on The following table shows the historical results of the the market price of the Company’s stock at the time of the closing of the transaction. For those entities accounted for as purchase transactions, the purchase price of the acquisitions has been allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values. Details of businesses acquired in transactions accounted for as purchases were as follows: 2001 2000 1999 Company and True North for the periods prior to the consummation of the merger: THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2001 (UNAUDITED) YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 1999 Revenue: IPG True North $1,302.2 $5,625.8 $4,977.8 1,439.4 1,556.9 356.0 Revenue, as restated $1,658.2 $7,182.7 $6,417.2 Consideration for new acquisitions Less: net assets of new acquisitions $ 98.7 17.1 $909.3 91.1 $349.0 35.7 Goodwill recorded for new acquisitions $ 81.6 $818.2 $313.3 Net income (loss): IPG, as previously reported True North, $ (38.3) $ 358.7 $ 331.3 Cash paid for new acquisitions Deferred cash payments, prior acquisitions Less: cash acquired $ 84.7 $577.4 $231.4 228.9 3.0 158.1 65.4 149.5 62.3 Net cash paid for acquisitions $310.6 $ 670.1 $318.6 2001 ACQUISITIONS PURCHASES The results of operations of the acquired companies, which included Transworld Marketing Corporation and DeVries Public Relations, were included in the consolidated results of the Company from their respective acquisition dates, which were generally in the middle of the year. None of the acquisi- tions made in 2001 was significant on an individual basis. ACQUISITION OF TRUE NORTH On June 22, 2001, the Company acquired True North Communications Inc. (“True North”), a global provider of advertising and communication services, in a transaction accounted for as a pooling of interests. Approximately 58.2 million shares were issued in connection with the acquisition, which, based on the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of closing, yielded a value of approximately $1,631. No adjustments were necessary to conform accounting policies of the entities. The Company’s consolidated financial statements, includ- ing the related notes, have been restated as of the earliest period presented to include the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of True North. as previously reported 9.5 61.6 28.1 Net income (loss), as restated $ (28.8) $ 420.3 $ 359.4 2000 ACQUISITIONS PURCHASES The companies acquired in transactions accounted for as purchases included Capita Technologies, Nationwide Advertising Services, Waylon, MWW and certain assets of Caribiner International. The results of operations of the acquired companies were included in the consolidated results of the Company from their respective acquisition dates, which occurred throughout the year. None of the acquisitions was significant on an individual basis. POOLINGS In April 2000, the Company acquired NFO Worldwide, Inc. (“NFO”), a leading provider of research-based marketing information and counsel, in a transaction accounted for as a pooling of interests. Approximately 12.6 million shares were issued to acquire NFO. In November 2000, the Company acquired Deutsch, Inc. and its affiliate companies (“Deutsch”), a full service advertising agency, in a transaction accounted for as a pooling of interests. Approximately 6 million shares were issued to acquire Deutsch. No adjustments were necessary to conform accounting policies of the entities. The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been restated as of the earliest period presented to include the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of NFO, Deutsch and the other immaterial acquisition (for which 0.5 million shares were issued) accounted for as poolings of interests. Revenue and net income for NFO for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 were $106.0 and $.2 and for the year 1999 were $457.2 and a loss of $6.2, respectively. Revenue and net income for Deutsch for the three quarters ended September 30, 2000 were $88.1 and $19.5 and for the year 1999 were $84.9 and $16.0, respectively. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 39 Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) The following table shows the historical results of the Company, NFO and Deutsch for the year ended December 31, 1999: Year Ended December 31, 1999 Revenue: IPG NFO Deutsch Other Revenue, as restated Net income (loss): IPG, as previously reported NFO, as previously reported Deutsch, as previously reported Other, as previously reported Net income, as restated $4,427.3 457.2 84.9 8.4 $4,977.8 $ 321.9 (6.2) 16.0 (.4) $ 331.3 In connection with the acquisition of Deutsch in 2000 and based on the taxable structure of the transaction, a deferred tax asset of approximately $110 and a current tax liability of $15 were recorded with corresponding adjustments to additional paid in capital. In connection with the acquisition of Deutsch, the Company recognized a charge related to one-time transaction costs of $44.7. The principal component of this amount related to the expense associated with various equity participation agreements with certain members of management. These agreements provided for participants to receive a portion of the proceeds in the event of the sale or merger of Deutsch. Prior to its acquisition by the Company, Deutsch elected to be treated as an “S” Corporation under applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code as well as for state income tax purposes. Accordingly, income tax expense was lower than would have been the case had Deutsch been treated as a “C” Corporation. Deutsch became a “C” Corporation upon its acquisition by the Company. On a pro forma basis, assuming “C” Corporation status, net income for Deutsch and the Company would have been lower by $10.7 in 2000 and $6.5 in 1999. The following unaudited pro forma data summarize the results of operations for the periods indicated as if the 2000 and 2001 purchase acquisitions had been completed as of January 1, 2000. For the year ended December 31, 2001 Revenue Net loss Loss per share: Basic Diluted IPG (AS REPORTED) $6,726.8 $ (505.3) $ (1.37) $ (1.37) PRE-ACQUISITION RESULTS (UNAUDITED) PRO FORMA IPG WITH 2001 ACQUISITIONS (UNAUDITED) $46.1 $ (1.3) $6,772.9 $ (506.6) $ (1.37) $ (1.37) For the year ended December 31, 2000 Revenue Net income Earnings per share: Basic Diluted IPG (AS REPORTED) $7,182.7 $ 420.3 $ $ 1.17 1.14 PRE-ACQUISITION RESULTS (UNAUDITED) PRO FORMA IPG WITH 2000 AND 2001 ACQUISITIONS (UNAUDITED) $376.5 $ 22.3 $7,559.2 $ 442.6 $ $ 1.23 1.20 The pro forma data give effect to actual operating results prior to the acquisition, adjusted to include the estimated pro forma effect of interest expense, amortization of intangibles and income taxes. These pro forma amounts do not purport to be indicative of the results that would have actually been obtained if the acquisitions occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented or that may be obtained in the future. 1999 ACQUISITIONS PURCHASES The companies acquired in transactions accounted for as purchases included The Cassidy Companies, Spedic France, Mullen Advertising and PDP Promotions UK. None of the acquisitions was significant on an individual basis. POOLINGS On December 1, 1999, the Company acquired Brands Hatch Leisure Plc., a UK-based international motorsports circuit and venue management company, for 5.2 million shares of stock. The acquisition has been accounted for as a pooling of interests. Additionally, during 1999 the Company issued 2 million shares to acquire 4 other companies, including public relations and media buying companies, which have been accounted for as poolings of interests. OTHER DEFERRED PAYMENTS Certain of the Company’s acquisition agreements provide for deferred payments by the Company, contingent upon future revenues or profits of the companies acquired. Deferred payments of both cash and shares of the Company’s common stock for prior years’ acquisitions were $277.1, $221.3 and $230.4 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Such payments are capitalized and recorded as goodwill. DISPOSITIONS During 2001, the Company disposed of 22 operations through either sale or closure. The operating results of the entities disposed of were not material to the operating results of the Company. 40 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 4: RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER MERGER RELATED COSTS Lease termination costs, net of estimated sublease income, 2001 ACTIVITIES Following the completion of the True North acquisition in June 2001, the Company initiated a series of operational initiatives focusing on: a) the integration of the True North operations and the identification of synergies and savings, b) the realignment of certain Interpublic businesses and c) productivity initiatives to achieve higher operating margins. As a result of the operational initiatives, the combined Company has been organized into four global operating groups. Three of these groups, McCann- Erickson WorldGroup, an enhanced FCB Group and a new global marketing resource called The Partnership, provide a full complement of global marketing services and marketing communication services. The fourth group, Advanced Marketing Services, focuses on expanding the Company’s operations in the area of specialized marketing communications and services. In connection with the operational initiatives, the Company executed a wide-ranging restructuring plan that included severance, lease terminations and other actions. The total amount of the charges incurred in connection with the plan was $645.6 ($446.5, net of tax), of which $592.8 was recorded in the third quarter with the remainder having been recorded through the end of the second quarter. A summary of the components of the total restructuring and other merger related costs in 2001, together with an analysis of the cash and non-cash elements, is as follows: TOTAL RECORDED CASH PAID IN 2001 NON-CASH ITEMS LIABILITY AT DECEMBER 31, 2001 TOTAL BY TYPE Severance and termination costs $297.5 $143.5 $ – $154.0 Lease termination and other exit costs Transaction costs Total 310.9 37.2 $645.6 55.2 31.5 $230.2 98.6 5.7 $104.3 157.1 – $311.1 The severance and termination costs related to approxi- mately 6,800 employees who have been, or will be, terminated. As of December 31, 2001, approximately 5,200 of those identified had been terminated. The remaining employees are expected to be terminated by the middle of the year 2002. A significant portion of severance liabilities are expected to be paid out over a period of up to one year. The employee groups affected included all levels and functions across the Company: executive, regional and account management, administrative, creative and media production personnel. Approximately half of the 6,800 headcount reductions related to the U.S., one third related to Europe (principally the UK, France and Germany), with the remainder related to Latin America and Asia Pacific. relate to the offices that have been or will be vacated as part of the restructuring. The Company plans to downsize or vacate approximately 180 locations and expects that all leases will have been terminated or subleased by the middle of the year 2002; however, the cash portion of the charge will be paid out over a period of up to five years. The geographical distribution of offices to be vacated is similar to the geographical distribution of the severance charges. Lease termination and related costs include write-offs related to the abandonment of leasehold improvements as part of the office vacancies. Other exit costs relate principally to the impairment loss on sale or closing of certain business units in the U.S. and Europe. In the aggregate, the businesses being sold or closed represent an immaterial portion of the revenue and operating profit of the Company. The write-off amount was computed based upon the difference between the estimated sales proceeds (if any) and the carrying value of the related assets. Approximately one half of the sales or closures had occurred by December 2001, with the remaining to occur by the middle of the year 2002. The transaction costs relate to the direct costs incurred in connection with the True North acquisition and included investment banker and other professional services fees. 2000 ACTIVITIES During 2000, the Company recorded restructuring and other merger related costs of $177.7 ($124.3, net of tax). Of the total pre-tax restructuring and other merger related costs, cash charges represented $104.6. The key components of the charge were: a) costs associated with the restructuring of Lowe & Partners Worldwide (formerly Lowe Lintas & Partners Worldwide), b) costs associated with the loss, by True North, of the Chrysler account, c) other costs related to the acquisition of Deutsch and d) costs relating principally to the merger with NFO. LOWE & PARTNERS In October 1999, the Company announced the merger of two of its advertising networks. The networks affected, Lowe & Partners Worldwide and Ammirati Puris Lintas, were combined to form a new agency. The merger involved the consolidation of operations in agencies in approximately 24 cities in 22 countries around the world and the severance of approximately 600 employees. As of September 30, 2000, all restructuring activities had been completed. In connection with this restructuring, costs of $84.1 ($51.4, net of tax) were recorded in 1999 and $87.8 ($53.6, net of tax) in 2000. Of the totals, $75.6 related to severance, $50.2 related to lease related costs and the remainder related principally to investment write-offs. No adjustment to the Company’s statement of operations was required as a result of the completion of the restructuring plan. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 41 Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) BOZELL AND FCB WORLDWIDE In September 1999, the Company announced a formal plan to restructure its Bozell and FCB Worldwide agency operations and recorded a $75.4 charge ($49.6, net of tax) in the third quarter of 1999. The charge covered primarily severance ($41.4) and lease termination and other exit costs ($24.2) in connection with the combination and integration of the two worldwide advertising agency networks. Approximately 640 individuals were terminated as part of the plan. Bozell Worldwide’s international operations, along with Bozell Detroit and Bozell Costa Mesa, were merged with FCB Worldwide and now operate under the FCB Worldwide name. The restructuring initiatives also included the impairment loss on the sale or closing of certain underperforming business units. The activities had been completed by December 31, 2000. NOTE 5: GOODWILL IMPAIRMENT AND OTHER OPERATING CHARGES GOODWILL IMPAIRMENT AND OTHER CHARGES Following the completion of the True North acquisition and the realignment of certain of the Company’s businesses, the Company evaluated the realizability of various assets. In connection with this review, undiscounted cash flow projections were prepared for certain investments, and the Company determined that the goodwill attributable to certain business units was stated at an amount in excess of the future estimated cashflows. As a result, an impairment charge of $303.1 ($263.4, net of tax) was recorded in 2001. Of the total write-off, $221.4 was recorded in the second quarter, with the remainder recorded in the third quarter. The largest components of the goodwill impairment and other charges were Capita Technologies, Inc. (approximately $145) and Zentropy Partners (approximately $16), both internet services businesses. The remaining amount primarily related to several other businesses including internet services, healthcare consulting and certain advertising offices in Europe and Asia Pacific. OPERATING EXPENSES Included in office and general expenses in 2001 are charges of $85.4 ($49.5, net of tax) relating primarily to operating assets, which are no longer considered realizable. Additionally, a benefit of $50.0 ($29.0, net of tax) resulting from a reduction in severance reserves related to recent significant headcount reductions is included in salaries and related expenses. LOSS OF CHRYSLER ACCOUNT In September 2000, Chrysler, one of True North’s larger accounts, announced that it was undertaking a review of its two advertising agencies to reduce the costs of its global advertising and media. On November 3, 2000, True North was informed that it was not selected as the agency of record. In December 2000, True North terminated its existing contract with Chrysler and entered into a transition agreement effective January 1, 2001. As a result of the loss of the Chrysler account, the Company recorded a charge of $17.5 pre-tax ($10.0, net of tax) in the fourth quarter of 2000. The charge covered primarily severance, lease termination and other exit costs associated with the decision to close the Detroit office. The severance portion of the charge amounted to $5.8 and reflected the elimination of approximately 250 positions. The charge also included $11.4 associated primarily with the lease termination of the Detroit office, as well as other exit costs. In addition, an impairment loss of $5.5 was recorded for intangible assets that were determined to be no longer recoverable. Offsetting these charges was a $5.2 payment from Chrysler to compensate the Company for severance and other exit costs. As of December 31, 2001, all actions had been completed. No adjustment to the Company’s statement of operations was required as a result of the completion of these actions. ACQUISITION OF DEUTSCH In connection with the acquisition of Deutsch in 2000, the Company recognized a charge related to one-time transaction costs of $44.7 ($41.7, net of tax). The principal component of this amount related to the expense associated with various equity participation agreements with certain members of management. These agreements provided for participants to receive a portion of the proceeds in the event of the sale or merger of Deutsch. NFO AND OTHER In addition to the above 2000 activities, additional charges, substantially all of which were cash costs, were recorded during 2000 related principally to the transaction and other merger related costs arising from the acquisition of NFO. Also included in 2000 were excess restructuring reserves of $0.6 related to the 1999 restructuring of Bozell and FCB Worldwide. This excess was reversed into income in the Company’s statement of operations during 2000. 1999 ACTIVITIES During 1999, the Company recorded restructuring and other merger related costs of $159.5 ($101.0, net of tax). Of the total pre-tax restructuring and other merger related costs, cash charges represented $91.5. The components of the charge were: a) costs associated with the restructuring of Lowe & Partners Worldwide (see above) and b) costs associated with the restructuring of Bozell and FCB Worldwide. 42 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 6: OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) NOTE 7: PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES INVESTMENT IMPAIRMENT During 2001 the Company recorded total charges related to the impairment of investments of $208.3 ($134.1, net of tax). Of the total amount, $160.1 ($103.7, net of tax) was recorded in the first quarter, with the remainder recorded in the third quarter. The charge in the first quarter related to the impairment of investments primarily in publicly traded internet-related companies, including marchFIRST, Inc. (an internet professional services firm), which had filed for relief under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code in April 2001. The third quarter charge includes write-offs for non-internet investments, certain venture funds and other investments. The impairment charge adjusted the carrying value of investments to the estimated market value where an other than temporary impairment has occurred. The Company accounts for income taxes under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (“SFAS 109”), “Accounting for Income Taxes”. SFAS 109 applies an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities with respect to the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements and tax returns. The components of income (loss) before provision for (benefit of) income taxes are as follows: Year ended December 31, 2001 2000 1999 Domestic Foreign $(470.0) (54.3) $501.6 324.9 $440.9 231.0 Total $(524.3) $826.5 $671.9 OTHER INCOME The following table sets forth the components of other income: The provision for (benefit of) income taxes consists of: December 31 2001 2000 1999 December 31 2001 2000 1999 Gains on sales of business Gains (losses) on sales of available-for-sale securities Investment income and miscellaneous $12.3 $16.5 $14.5 (2.5) 3.9 28.5 1.2 45.3 6.0 $13.7 $46.2 $65.8 During 2001, the Company sold a marketing services affiliate in Europe for approximately $5 and some non-core marketing services affiliates in the U.S. for approximately $6.9. During 2000, the Company sold its interest in a non-core minority owned marketing services business for proceeds of approximately $12. During 1999, the Company sold its entire investment in Publicis S.A. for net cash proceeds of $135.3 and a portion of its investments in the common stock of Lycos and marchFIRST (formerly USWEB) for combined proceeds of approximately $56. Additionally, the Company sold its minority interest in Nicholson NY, Inc. to Icon in exchange for shares of Icon’s common stock worth $19. Federal Income Taxes (Including Foreign Withholding Taxes): Current Deferred State and Local Income Taxes: Current Deferred Foreign Income Taxes: Current Deferred $ 49.6 (144.4) $168.8 2.9 $117.9 25.1 (94.8) 171.7 143.0 3.9 (36.9) (33.0) 48.4 (2.8) 45.6 32.3 4.3 36.6 93.8 (9.9) 83.9 151.8 (20.3) 131.5 120.5 (14.8) 105.7 Total $ (43.9) $348.8 $285.3 At December 31, 2001 and 2000 the deferred tax assets consisted of the following items: December 31, 2001 2000 Postretirement/postemployment benefits Deferred compensation Pension costs Depreciation Rent Interest Accrued reserves Allowance for doubtful accounts Goodwill amortization Investments in equity securities Tax loss/tax credit carryforwards Restructuring and other merger related costs Other Total deferred tax assets Valuation allowance Net deferred tax assets $ 59.6 112.5 21.3 (11.0) (9.6) 3.5 12.2 16.8 83.9 33.7 74.2 220.3 (2.8) 614.6 (41.8) $ 55.2 98.6 25.2 (11.7) (10.5) 1.7 20.6 13.8 98.1 32.9 54.1 26.1 1.8 405.9 (25.6) $572.8 $380.3 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 43 Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) The valuation allowance of $41.8 and $25.6 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, represents a provision for uncertainty as to the realization of certain deferred tax assets, including U.S. tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards in certain jurisdictions. The change during 2001 in the deferred tax valuation allowance primarily relates to uncertainties regarding the utilization of tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards. At December 31, 2001, there were $31.0 of tax credit carryforwards with expiration periods through 2006 and net operating loss carryforwards with a tax effect of $43.2 with various expiration periods. The Company has concluded that, based upon expected future results, it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset balance will be realized. A reconciliation of the effective income tax rate as shown in the consolidated statement of income to the federal statutory rate is as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2001 2000 1999 Statutory federal income tax rate State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit Impact of foreign operations, including withholding taxes Goodwill and intangible asset amortization Effect of pooled companies Effect of non-recurring items: Goodwill impairment Restructuring and other merger related costs Investment impairment Other Effective tax rate (35.0)% 35.0% 35.0% 3.1 2.5 6.5 – 3.5 2.8 (0.7) 3.4 1.7 0.9 3.6 2.2 12.6 – – 5.1 (0.2) (3.0) 1.1 – (1.8) (0.4) – (1.6) (8.4)% 42.2% 42.5% As described in Note 3, prior to its acquisition by the Company, Deutsch had elected to be treated as an “S” Corporation and accordingly, its income tax expense was lower than it would have been had Deutsch been treated as a “C” Corporation. Deutsch became a “C” Corporation upon its acquisition by the Company. Assuming Deutsch had been a “C” Corporation since 1999, the Company’s effective tax rate would have been 43.5% and 43.4% for 2000 and 1999, respectively. The total amount of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries for income tax purposes was approximately $847.7 at December 31, 2001. It is the Company’s intention to reinvest undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries and thereby indefinitely postpone their remittance. Accordingly, no provision has been made for foreign withholding taxes or United States income taxes which may become payable if undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were paid as dividends to the Company. The additional taxes on that portion of undistributed earnings which is available for dividends are not practicably determinable. NOTE 8: SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS The Company and its subsidiaries have lines of credit with various banks that permit borrowings at variable interest rates. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, borrowings in the United States under these facilities totaled $87.2 and $117.8, respectively. Borrowings by subsidiaries outside the United States at December 31, 2001 and 2000 totaled $231.3 and $365.9, respectively. These international borrowings principally consist of drawings against uncommitted bank facilities. These credit lines are primarily provided by key relationship banks, which also participate in our committed facilities. Where required, the Company has guaranteed the repayment of these borrowings. Short-term unused lines of credit by the Company and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2001 and 2000 aggregated approximately $1,000 and $1,200, respectively. The weighted-average interest rates on outstanding balances at December 31, 2001 and 2000 were approximately 4.2% and 6.6%, respectively. FLOATING RATE NOTES On June 28, 2001, the Company issued and sold $100.0 of floating rate notes. The notes mature on June 28, 2002 and bear interest at a variable rate based on three month LIBOR. The Company intends to repay these notes at maturity from its available borrowing capacity. CREDIT AGREEMENTS On June 26, 2001, the Company replaced its maturing $375.0, 364-day syndicated revolving multi-currency credit agreement with a substantially similar $500.0 facility. The facility bears interest at variable rates based on either LIBOR or a bank’s base rate, at the Company’s option. As of December 31, 2001, there were no outstanding balances under this facility. Prior to June 25, 2002, the Company may, at its option, borrow the full amount of the facility for a one-year term. 44 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 9: LONG-TERM DEBT Long-term debt at December 31 consisted of the following: Convertible Subordinated Notes — 1.80% Convertible Subordinated Notes — 1.87% Zero-Coupon Convertible Notes Senior Unsecured Note — 7.875% Senior Unsecured Note — 7.25% Syndicated Multi-Currency Credit 2001 2000 $ 228.5 $ 221.2 311.9 – 500.0 – 320.0 575.3 500.0 500.0 Agreement — 3.05% (7.0% in 2000) 144.1 160.0 Term Loans — 6.05% to 8.01% (5.03% to 7.91% in 2000) Germany Mortgage Note Payable — 7.6% Other Mortgage Notes Payable and 203.9 22.7 307.7 24.5 Long-Term Loans — 2.30% to 17.27% 20.7 72.0 Less: Current Portion Long-Term Debt 2,515.2 34.6 1,597.3 65.5 $2,480.6 $1,531.8 ZERO-COUPON CONVERTIBLE NOTES In December 2001, the Company completed the issuance and sale of approximately $702 of aggregate principal amount of Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes (“Zero-Coupon Notes”) due 2021. The Company used the net proceeds of $563.5 from this offering to repay indebtedness under the Company’s credit facilities. The Zero-Coupon Notes are unsecured, zero-coupon, senior securities that may be converted into common shares if the price of the Company’s common stock reaches a specified threshold, at a conversion rate of 22.8147 shares per one thousand dollars principal amount at maturity, subject to adjustment. This threshold will initially be 120% of the accreted value of a Zero-Coupon Note, divided by the conversion rate and will decline 1/2% each year until it reaches 110% at maturity in 2021. A Zero-Coupon Note’s accreted value is the sum of its issue price plus its accrued original issue discount. The Zero-Coupon Notes may also be converted, regardless of the sale price of the Company’s common stock, at any time after: (i) the credit rating assigned to the Zero-Coupon Notes by any two of Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group and Fitch IBCA Duff & Phelps are Bal, BB+ and BB+, respectively, or lower, or the Zero-Coupon Notes are no longer rated by at least two of these ratings services, (ii) the Company calls the Zero-Coupon Notes for redemption, (iii) the Company makes specified distributions to shareholders or (iv) the Company becomes a party to a consolidation, merger or binding share exchange pursuant to which our common stock would be converted into cash or property (other than securities). The Company, at the investor’s option, may be required to redeem the Zero-Coupon Notes for cash on December 14, 2003. The Company may also be required to redeem the Zero-Coupon Notes at the investor’s option, on December 14, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2011 or 2016 for cash or common stock or a combination of both, at the Company’s election. Additionally, the Company has the option of redeeming the Zero-Coupon Notes after December 14, 2006 for cash. The yield to maturity of the Zero-Coupon Notes at the date of issuance was 1%. Unless the Company is required to pay the contingent interest described in the following sentence or the U.S. tax laws change in certain ways, no cash interest will be paid at any time. After December 14, 2006, if the Company’s stock price reaches specified thresholds, the Company would be obligated to pay semi-annual contingent cash interest which would approximate the dividends paid to common stockholders during the prior six-month period (subject to a floor rate). Further, in the event that the notes are not registered for public sale by May 13, 2002, additional amounts of up to 0.5% per annum would be payable until the registration is declared effective by the SEC. SENIOR UNSECURED NOTES — 7.25% On August 22, 2001, the Company completed the issuance and sale of $500.0 principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2011. The notes bear interest at a rate of 7.25% per annum. The Company used the net proceeds of approximately $493 from the sale of the notes to repay outstanding indebtedness under its credit facilities. SENIOR UNSECURED NOTES — 7.875% On October 20, 2000, the Company completed the issuance and sale of $500.0 principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2005. The notes bear an interest rate of 7.875% per annum. The Company used the net proceeds of approximately $496 from the sale of the notes to repay outstanding indebtedness under its credit facilities. During 2001, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to convert the fixed interest rate on the 7.875% notes to a variable rate based on 6 month LIBOR. At December 31, 2001, the Company had outstanding interest rate swap agreements covering $400.0 of the $500.0, 7.875% notes due October 2005. The swaps have the same term as the 7.875% notes and, for 2001, had the effect of reducing the effective interest rate on the notes to 6.972%. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 45 Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) CREDIT AGREEMENTS In July 2001, the Company entered into a credit agreement with a group of lenders. The credit agreement provided for revolving borrowings of up to $750.0. No borrowings were drawn under this facility and the facility terminated upon the issuance and sale of the $500.0 Senior Notes on August 22, 2001. agreements). At December 31, 2001, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants, with the most restrictive being that of cash flow to borrowed funds, the ratio of which is required to exceed .25 to 1. During 2001, as a result of the significant non-recurring charges, the Company required and received amendments related to its financial covenants. In June 2000, the Company entered into a five-year syndicated revolving multi-currency credit agreement with a group of lenders. The credit agreement provides for borrowings of up to $375.0 which bear interest at variable rate based on LIBOR or a bank’s base rate, at the Company’s option. At December 31, 2001, there was approximately $144.1 borrowed under this facility. CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED NOTES — 1.87% On June 1, 1999, the Company issued $361.0 face amount of Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2006 with a cash coupon rate of 1.87% and a yield to maturity of 4.75%. The 2006 notes were issued at an original price of 83% of the face amount, generating proceeds of approximately $300. The notes are convertible into 6.4 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of 17.616 shares per one thousand dollars face amount. From June 2002, the Company may redeem the notes for cash. CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED NOTES — 1.80% On September 16, 1997, the Company issued $250.0 face amount of Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2004 with a coupon rate of 1.80% and a yield to maturity of 5.25%. The 2004 Notes were issued at an original price of 80% of the face amount, generating proceeds of approximately $200. The notes are convertible into 6.7 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of 26.772 shares per one thousand dollars face amount. Since September 2000, the Company has had the option to redeem the notes for cash. OTHER The Company’s bank-provided revolving credit agreements include financial covenants that set maximum levels of debt as a function of EBITDA and minimum levels of EBITDA as a function of interest expense (as defined in these agreements). The financial covenants contained in the Company’s term loan agreements set minimum levels for net worth and for cash flow as a function of borrowed funds and maximum levels of borrowed funds as a function of net worth (as defined in these Long-term debt maturing over the next five years and thereafter is as follows: 2002-$34.6, 2003-$52.6, 2004-$266.3, 2005-$507.6, 2006-$461.6 and $1,192.5 thereafter. See Note 14 for discussion of fair market value of the Company’s long-term debt. NOTE 10: INCENTIVE PLANS The 1997 Performance Incentive Plan (“1997 PIP Plan”) was approved by the Company’s stockholders in May 1997 and includes both stock and cash based incentive awards. The maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock which may be granted in any year under the 1997 PIP Plan is equal to 1.85% of the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on the first day of the year adjusted for additional shares as defined in the 1997 PIP Plan document (excluding management incentive compensation performance awards). The 1997 PIP Plan also limits the number of shares available with respect to awards made to any one participant as well as limiting the number of shares available under certain awards. Awards made prior to the 1997 PIP Plan remain subject to the respective terms and conditions of the predecessor plans. Except as otherwise noted, awards under the 1997 PIP Plan have terms similar to awards made under the respective predecessor plans. STOCK OPTIONS Stock options are generally granted at the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and are exercisable as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”). Generally, options become exercisable between two and five years after the date of grant and expire ten years from the grant date. 46 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) Following is a summary of stock option transactions during the three-year period ended December 31: Shares under option, beginning of year Options granted Options exercised Options cancelled Shares under option, end of year Options exercisable at year-end 2001 WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE $25 $36 $15 $33 $29 $22 SHARES (000s) 34,939 10,048 (5,228) (1,445) 38,314 20,166 SHARES (000s) 34,665 6,381 (3,657) (2,450) 34,939 12,008 2000 WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE $22 $38 $15 $28 $25 $15 1999 WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE $18 $33 $12 $23 $22 $14 SHARES (000s) 37,401 6,774 (6,485) (3,025) 34,665 11,647 The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2001: RANGE OF EXERCISE PRICES $ 3.31 to $ 9.99 $10.00 to $14.99 $15.00 to $24.99 $25.00 to $60.00 NUMBER OF SHARES (000s) OUTSTANDING AT 12/31/01 WEIGHTED-AVERAGE REMAINING CONTRACTUAL LIFE WEIGHTED-AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE NUMBER OF SHARES (000s) EXERCISABLE AT 12/31/01 WEIGHTED-AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE 1,302 2,110 10,583 24,319 1.56 2.93 5.55 8.17 $ 7.10 $11.22 $18.95 $36.46 1,302 2,100 10,032 6,732 $ 7.10 $11.22 $18.87 $33.24 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN Under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), employees may purchase common stock of the Company through payroll deductions not exceeding 10% of their compensation. The price an employee pays for a share of stock is 85% of the market price on the last business day of the month. The Company issued approximately eight hundred thousand shares in 2001, six hundred thousand shares in 2000 and five hundred thousand shares in 1999, under the ESPP. An additional 14.1 million shares were reserved for issuance at December 31, 2001. SFAS 123 DISCLOSURES The Company applies the disclosure principles of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“SFAS 123”), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. As permitted by the provisions of SFAS 123, the Company applies APB Opinion 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based employee compensation plans. If compensation cost for the Company’s stock option plans and its ESPP had been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates as defined by SFAS 123, the Company’s pro forma net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share would have been as follows: 2001 2000 1999 Net income (loss) As reported Pro forma $(505.3) $(573.9) $420.3 $382.9 $359.4 $325.3 Earnings (loss) per share Basic Diluted As reported Pro forma As reported Pro forma $ (1.37) $ (1.56) $ (1.37) $ (1.56) $ 1.17 $ 1.06 $ 1.14 $ 1.03 $ 1.02 $ 0.92 $ 0.99 $ 0.89 For purposes of this pro forma information, the fair value of shares issued under the ESPP was based on the 15% discount received by employees. The weighted-average fair value (discount) on the date of purchase for stock purchased under this plan was $4.50, $6.17 and $5.28 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of options granted during 2001, 2000 and 1999 was $12.55, $14.86 and $12.94, respectively. The fair value of each option grant has been estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: Expected option lives Risk free interest rate Expected volatility Dividend yield 2001 2000 1999 6 years 6 years 6 years 4.89% 30.35% 1.19% 6.15% 5.72% 25.86% 19.73% .81% .89% 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 47 Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) As required by SFAS 123, this pro forma information is based on stock awards beginning in 1995, and accordingly, the pro forma information for 1999 is not likely to be representative of the pro forma effects in future years because options generally vest over five years. RESTRICTED STOCK Restricted stock issuances are subject to certain restrictions and vesting requirements as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The vesting period is generally five to seven years. No monetary consideration is paid by a recipient for a restricted stock award and the grant date fair value of these shares is amortized over the restriction periods. At December 31, 2001, there was a total of 6.3 million shares of restricted stock outstanding. During 2001, 2000 and 1999, the Company awarded 1.5 million shares, 2.4 million shares and 1.2 million shares of restricted stock with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $32.09, $42.13 and $35.84, respectively. The cost recorded for restricted stock awards in 2001, 2000 and 1999 was $48.4, $40.3 and $27.7, respectively. PERFORMANCE UNITS Performance units have been awarded to certain key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The ultimate value of these performance units is contingent upon the annual growth in profits (as defined) of the Company, its operating components or both, over the performance periods. The awards are generally paid in cash. The projected value of these units is accrued by the Company and charged to expense over the performance period. The Company expensed approximately $45, $40 and $42 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. NOTE 11: RETIREMENT PLANS DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS Through March 31, 1998 the Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries had a defined benefit plan (“Domestic Plan”) which covered substantially all regular domestic employees. Effective April 1, 1998, this Plan was curtailed and participants with five or less years of service became fully vested in the Domestic Plan. Participants with five or more years of service as of March 31, 1998 retain their vested balances and participate in a new benefit plan. Under the new plan, each participant’s account is credited with an annual allocation, which approximates the projected discounted pension benefit accrual (normally made under the Domestic Plan) plus interest, while they continue to work for the Company. Participants in active service are eligible to receive up to ten years of allocations coinciding with the number of years of plan participation with the Company after March 31, 1998. Net periodic pension costs (income) for the Domestic Plan for 2001, 2000 and 1999 were $1.6, ($.9) and $1.3, respectively. Additionally, NFO maintains a defined benefit plan (“NFO Plan”) covering approximately one half of NFO’s U.S. employees. The periodic pension costs for this plan for 2001, 2000 and 1999 were $0.6, $0.5 and $0.8, respectively. The Company’s stockholders’ equity balance includes a minimum pension liability of $24.0, $18.6 and $18.6 at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The Company also has several foreign pension plans in which benefits are based primarily on years of service and employee compensation. It is the Company’s policy to fund these plans in accordance with local laws and income tax regulations. Net periodic pension costs for foreign pension plans for 2001, 2000 and 1999 included the following components: Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation Amortization of prior service cost Recognized actuarial loss (gain) 2001 2000 1999 $ 10.4 11.7 (10.7) $ 9.5 11.6 (12.0) $ 9.6 11.8 (9.4) 1.3 .6 (.6) .5 .7 (.3) .4 .8 .5 Net periodic pension cost $ 12.7 $ 10.0 $13.7 48 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) The following table sets forth the change in the benefit obligation, the change in plan assets, the funded status and amounts recognized for the pension plans in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2001 and 2000: DOMESTIC PENSION PLANS FOREIGN PENSION PLANS 2001 2000 2001 2000 Change in benefit obligation Beginning obligation Service cost Interest cost Benefits paid Participant contributions Actuarial (gains) losses Currency effect Other Ending obligation Change in plan assets Beginning fair value Actual return on plan assets Employer contributions Participant contributions Benefits paid Currency effect Other Ending fair value Funded status of the plans Unrecognized net actuarial loss Unrecognized prior service cost Unrecognized transition cost Net asset (liability) recognized $153.8 .7 10.4 (13.9) – (3.6) – .1 147.5 132.5 (6.2) .4 – (13.9) – – 112.8 (34.7) 45.0 .1 – $151.9 .7 10.5 (14.7) – 5.4 – – 153.8 135.5 2.5 9.2 – (14.7) – – 132.5 (21.3) 33.5 – – $231.7 10.4 11.7 (16.6) 2.3 (15.7) (15.1) .2 208.9 183.8 (18.0) 7.8 2.3 (16.6) (14.7) 4.1 148.7 (60.2) 14.3 .8 1.9 $226.5 9.5 11.6 (10.9) 1.6 8.0 (14.9) .3 231.7 192.7 (2.3) 8.3 1.6 (10.9) (5.8) .2 183.8 (47.9) 5.4 1.3 2.7 $ 10.4 $ 12.2 $ (43.2) $ (38.5) At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the assets of the Domestic Plans and the foreign pension plans were primarily invested in fixed income and equity securities. For the Domestic Plans, discount rates of 7.25% in 2001, 7.5% in 2000 and 7.75% in 1999 and salary increase assump- tions of 3.5% in 2001 and 4.5% in 2000 and 1999 (for the NFO Plan) were used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation. The expected return of Domestic Plans assets was 9% to 9.5% in 2001, 2000 and 1999. For the foreign pension plans, discount rates ranging from 3% to 10% in 2001, 3.8% to 10% in 2000 and 3.75% to 14% in 1999 and salary increase assumptions ranging from 1% to 10% in 2001, 2.5% to 10% in 2000 and 3% to 10% in 1999 were used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation. The expected rates of return on the assets of the foreign pension plans ranged from 2% to 10% in 2001 and 2000 and 2% to 14% in 1999. As of December 31, 2001, the projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for the Domestic Plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets were approximately $147, $146 and $113, respectively, and as of December 31, 2000, approximately $145, $145 and $124, respectively. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for the foreign pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were approximately $69, $66 and $3, respectively, as of December 31, 2001 and approximately $77, $72 and $5, respectively, as of December 31, 2000. OTHER BENEFIT ARRANGEMENTS The Company sponsors other defined contribution plans (“Savings Plans”) and certain domestic subsidiaries maintain a profit sharing plan that cover substantially all domestic employees of the Company and participating subsidiaries. The Savings Plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis. The Savings Plans allow participants to choose among several investment alternatives. The Company matches a portion of participants’ contributions based upon the number of years of service. The Company match is made in cash and ranges between 2-4% of salary. The Company contributed $36.7, $34.2 and $27.4 to the Savings Plans and Profit Sharing Plan in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 49 Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) The Company has deferred compensation plans which The following table sets forth the change in benefit permit certain of its key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary and incentive compensation and receive corresponding company matching and discretionary profit sharing contributions. The Company has purchased whole life insurance policies on participants’ lives to assist in the funding of the deferred compensation liability. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the cash surrender value of these policies was approx- imately $105 and $73, respectively. Additionally, certain investments are maintained in a separate trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation liability. The assets are held on the balance sheet of the Company but are restricted to the purpose of paying the deferred compensation liability. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the value of such restricted assets was approximately $91 and $71, respectively. POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS The Company and its subsidiaries provide certain postretirement health care benefits for employees who were in the employ of the Company as of January 1, 1988 and life insurance benefits for employees who were in the employ of the Company as of December 1, 1961. The plans cover certain domestic employees and certain key employees in foreign countries. The Company’s plan covering postretirement medical benefits is self-insured with no maximum limit of coverage. However, the Company carries insurance to cover medical benefits of between $350 thousand and one million dollars per person per year for retirees pre-65 years of age, for whom the Company is the primary insurer. The Company accrues the expected cost of postretirement benefits other than pensions over the period in which the active employees become eligible for such postretirement benefits. The net periodic expense for these postretirement benefits for 2001, 2000 and 1999 was $3.7, $3.0 and $3.0, respectively. obligation, change in plan assets, funded status and amounts recognized for the Company’s postretirement benefit plans in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2001 and 2000: Change in benefit obligation Beginning obligation Service cost Interest cost Participant contributions Benefits paid Plan amendments Actuarial loss Ending obligation Change in plan assets Beginning fair value Actual return on plan assets Employer contributions Participant contributions Benefits paid Ending fair value Funded status of the plans Unrecognized net actuarial gain Unrecognized prior service cost Unrecognized net transaction obligation (assets) 2001 2000 $ 49.4 .9 3.7 .1 (4.6) – 3.1 $ 45.8 .5 3.9 .1 (3.9) (.6) 3.6 52.6 49.4 – – 4.5 .1 (4.6) – (52.6) (2.9) (.5) 1.6 – – 3.8 .1 (3.9) – (49.4) (6.2) (1.5) 1.9 Net liability recognized $(54.4) $(55.2) Discount rates of 7.25% in 2001, 7.5% to 7.8% in 2000 and 6.8% to 7.75% in 1999 and salary increase assumptions of 3.5% to 6% in 2001, 5% to 6% in 2000 and 4% to 6% in 1999 were used in determining the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. A 6.1% to 12% and a 5% to 7.5% increase in the cost of covered health care benefits were assumed for 2001 and 2000, respectively. These rates are assumed to decrease incrementally to approximately 5% to 11% in the years 2002 to 2006 and remain at that level thereafter. A 1% increase in the health care cost trend rate would increase the obligation by approximately $3 and the periodic expense by $0.3. A 1% decrease would decrease the obligation and expense by similar amounts. 50 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 12: COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) amounts are reflected in the consolidated financial statements as follows: 2001 2000 1999 Net income (loss) $(505.3) $420.3 $359.4 Foreign currency translation adjustment (89.6) (91.1) (100.8) ADJUSTMENT FOR MINIMUM PENSION LIABILITY: Adjustment for minimum pension liability Tax benefit Adjustment for minimum pension liability UNREALIZED HOLDING GAIN (LOSS) ON SECURITIES: Unrealized holding gains Tax expense Unrealized holding losses Tax benefit Reclassification of unrealized loss to net earnings Tax benefit Reclassification of unrealized gains to net earnings Tax expense (9.3) 3.9 (5.4) – – – 18.6 – 18.6 0.5 (0.2) – – 9.1 (3.8) (381.9) 160.4 309.8 (130.1) (8.4) 3.5 94.8 (39.8) – – – – FORWARD CONTRACTS (0.3) 0.1 (13.8) 5.8 (34.7) 14.7 Unrealized holding gain (loss) on securities 55.1 (224.2) 154.8 Comprehensive income (loss) $(545.2) $105.0 $432.0 As of December 31, accumulated other comprehensive loss as reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet is as follows: 2001 2000 1999 Foreign currency translation adjustment Adjustment for minimum pension liability Unrealized holding gain (loss) on securities $(428.1) $(338.5) $(247.4) (18.6) 169.7 (18.6) (54.5) (24.0) 0.6 Accumulated other comprehensive loss $(451.5) $(411.6) $ (96.3) NOTE 13: DERIVATIVE AND HEDGING INSTRUMENTS The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements, forward foreign currency contracts and maintains certain debt balances in currencies other than the Company’s functional currency. INTEREST RATE SWAPS At December 31, 2001, the Company had outstanding interest rate swap agreements covering $400.0 of the $500.0, 7.875% notes due October 2005. The swaps have the same term as the debt and effectively convert the fixed rate on the debt to a variable rate based on 6 month LIBOR. The swaps are accounted for as hedges of the fair value of the related debt and are recorded as an asset or liability as appropriate. As of December 31, 2001, the fair value of the hedges was an asset of approximately $10. The net effect of the hedges is that interest expense on the $400.0 of debt being hedged is recorded at variable rates, which for 2001 resulted in the effective interest rate on the $500.0, 7.875% notes being reduced to 6.972%. The fair value is estimated based on quotes from the market makers of these instruments and represents the estimated amounts that the Company would expect to receive if these agreements were terminated. These instruments were executed with institutions the Company believes to be credit-worthy. HEDGES OF NET INVESTMENT The Company has significant foreign operations and conducts business in various foreign currencies. In order to hedge the value of its investment in Europe, the Company has designated approximately 125 million Euro of borrowings under its $375.0 syndicated revolving multi-currency credit facility as a hedge of this net investment. Changes in the spot rate of the debt instruments designated as hedges of the net investment in a foreign subsidiary are reflected in the cumulative translation adjustment component of stockholders’ equity. The amount deferred in 2001 was approximately $5. SHORT-TERM The Company has entered into foreign currency transactions in which foreign currencies (principally the Euro, Pounds Sterling and the Japanese Yen) are bought or sold forward. The contracts were entered into to meet currency requirements arising from specific transactions. The changes in value of these forward contracts were reflected in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. As of December 31, 2001 the Company had contracts covering approximately $50 of notional amount of currency. Substantially all of these contracts expire by the end of February 2002. As of December 31, 2001, the fair value of the forwards was a loss of $0.2. LONG-TERM In September 2000, the Company acquired a 35.5% interest in Springer & Jacoby, a German-based advertising group, for total consideration of $25.9. The consideration consisted of an initial cash payment of $16.9 and a put option valued at $9.0. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, two shareholders of Springer & Jacoby have the right to sell all of their shares (put option) to the Company in January 2003 at a fixed price of 27.1 million Euros. The additional shares to be purchased in January 2003 pursuant to the put option represent 15.5% of the outstanding shares of Springer & Jacoby. The Company has recorded the fair value of this put option as an $8.3 liability at December 31, 2001. The Company has entered into forward contracts to purchase 27.1 million Euros in January 2003. The fair value of the forward contracts was recorded as an asset of $1.0 at December 31, 2001. Changes in the fair value of the put option liability and the forward contracts are reflected as a component of the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 51 Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) OTHER Under the terms of the offering of Zero-Coupon Convertible Notes in December 2001 (see Note 9), two embedded derivative instruments were created. The derivatives are related to: a) the value of the contingent interest feature (whereby cash interest may become payable in certain circumstances) and b) the value of the feature that the debt become convertible upon a reduction in the credit rating of the Notes. The Company obtained valuations of the two derivatives at the time of initial issuance of the Notes and determined that the fair value of the two derivatives was negligible. At December 31, 2001, the fair value of the two derivatives was negligible. NOTE 14: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Financial assets, which include cash and cash equivalents, short-term marketable securities and receivables, have carrying values which approximate fair value. Marketable securities are deemed to be available-for-sale as defined by SFAS 115 and accordingly are reported at fair value, with net unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of the comprehensive income. The following table summarizes net unrealized holding gains and losses on marketable securities before taxes at December 31: (Dollars in Millions) 2001 2000 1999 Cost Unrealized: Gains Losses Net unrealized gains (losses) $68.2 $217.1 $172.3 1.4 – 1.4 1.3 (94.9) (93.6) 304.3 (12.2) 292.1 Fair market value $69.6 $123.5 $464.4 Unrealized holding gains (losses), net of tax, were $0.6, $(54.5) and $169.7 at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Financial liabilities with carrying values approximating fair value include accounts payable and accrued expenses, as well as short-term bank borrowings. As of December 31, the fair value of the Company’s significant long-term borrowings was as follows: Convertible Subordinated Notes —1.87% Convertible Subordinated Notes — 1.80% Senior Unsecured Note — 7.875% Senior Unsecured Note — 7.25% Zero-Coupon Convertible Notes 2001 2000 BOOK VALUE FAIR VALUE BOOK VALUE FAIR VALUE $320.0 $228.5 $500.0 $500.0 $575.3 $284.7 $235.9 $513.4 $476.7 $593.1 $311.9 $221.2 $500.0 – $ – $ $339.0 $293.0 $509.0 – $ – $ Effective February 10, 1999, a majority-owned subsidiary of the Company, Modem Media, Poppe Tyson, Inc. (now known as Modem Media, Inc.), completed an initial public offering (IPO) of its common stock. The number of shares issued was 3.0 million, at a price of $16 per share, with net proceeds totaling $42.0. As a result of the IPO, the Company owned approximately 48% of Modem Media, down from its 70% ownership, but controlled approximately 80% of the related stockholder votes due to the super-majority voting right on its Class B shares. Modem Media used the proceeds from the IPO for working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions. As a result of this transaction, the Company recorded a $2.6 gain, net of $2.0 of deferred income taxes, as a credit to stockholders’ equity. In April 2000, the Company converted all of its shares of Modem Media Class B common stock into Class A common stock pursuant to a Stockholders’ Agreement with Modem Media. As a result, the Company’s voting power was reduced from approximately 80% to approximately 46%. Accordingly, effective with the second quarter of 2000, Modem Media is no longer consolidated in the Company’s financial statements and is accounted for on the equity method. NOTE 15: GEOGRAPHIC AREAS Following the acquisition of True North in June 2001, the Company was reorganized into four global operating groups. The Company’s global groups are: a) McCann-Erickson WorldGroup (“McCann”), b) the FCB Group (“FCB”), c) The Partnership and d) Advanced Marketing Services (“AMS”). Each of the four groups has its own management structure and reports to senior management of the Company on the basis of the four groups. McCann, FCB and The Partnership provide a full complement of global marketing services including advertising and media management, marketing communications including direct marketing, public relations, sales promotion, event marketing, on-line marketing and healthcare marketing in addition to specialized marketing services. AMS provides marketing communication services, primarily public relations, and also includes NFO WorldGroup (for marketing intelligence services) and Jack Morton Worldwide (for specialized marketing services including corporate events, meetings and training/learning). 52 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 16: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES The Company and its subsidiaries lease certain facilities and equipment. Gross rental expense amounted to approximately $470.2 for 2001, $433.8 for 2000 and $393.6 for 1999, which was reduced by sublease income of $29.2 in 2001, $34.7 in 2000 and $33.5 in 1999. Minimum rental commitments for the rental of office premises and equipment under noncancellable leases, some of which provide for rental adjustments due to increased property taxes and operating costs for 2002 and thereafter, are as follows: PERIOD 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 and thereafter AMOUNT $314.1 $210.4 $189.8 $157.2 $145.6 $535.8 Certain of the Company’s acquisition agreements provide for deferred payments by the Company, contingent upon future revenues or profits of the companies acquired. Such contingent amounts are approximately $550 (including cash and stock) assuming the full amount due under these acquisition agreements is paid, however, the Company does not expect to pay the full amount estimated. The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are party to various tax examinations, some of which have resulted in assessments. The Company intends to vigorously defend any and all assessments and believes that additional taxes (if any) that may ultimately result from the settlement of such assessments or open examinations would not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements. The Company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings of various types. While any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, the Company believes that the outcome of such proceedings or claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company. Each of McCann, FCB, The Partnership and AMS operates with the same business objective which is to provide clients with a wide variety of services that contribute to the delivery of a message and to the maintenance or creation of a brand. The service offerings included in AMS are affiliated with the three other operating groups and provide services to clients on a seamless and integrated basis. Given the similarity of the operations, the Company has aggregated the results of the four groups. The four groups have similar economic characteristics and, specifically, are similar in: a) the nature of the services they provide, b) the manner in which the services are delivered and c) the type of clients served. Long-lived assets and revenue are presented below by major geographic area: 2001 2000 1999 LONG-LIVED ASSETS: United States International United Kingdom All Other Europe Asia Pacific Latin America Other Total International Total Consolidated REVENUE: United States International United Kingdom All Other Europe Asia Pacific Latin America Other Total International Total Consolidated $2,772.5 $2,702.9 $2,189.5 610.7 782.0 155.0 116.5 118.0 568.9 850.3 310.8 118.9 133.9 504.9 742.8 297.0 105.6 87.1 1,782.2 1,982.8 1,737.4 $4,554.7 $4,685.7 $3,926.9 $3,805.8 $4,244.2 $3,624.2 679.7 1,161.0 478.9 327.1 274.3 604.9 1,233.6 508.9 333.7 257.4 596.0 1,278.7 415.1 280.0 223.2 2,921.0 2,938.5 2,793.0 $6,726.8 $7,182.7 $6,417.2 Revenue is attributed to geographic areas based on where the services are performed. Property and equipment is allocated based upon physical location. Intangible assets, other assets and investments are allocated based on the location of the related operation. The largest client of the Company contributed approxi- mately 7% in 2001, 6% in 2000 and 6% in 1999 to revenue. The Company’s second largest client contributed approximately 2% in 2001, 2% in 2000 and 3% in 1999 to revenue. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 53 Financial Statements SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA FOR FIVE YEARS The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts and Number of Employees) OPERATING DATA Revenue Operating expenses Restructuring and other merger related costs Goodwill impairment and other charges Special compensation charge Investment impairment Interest expense Provision for (benefit of) income taxes Net income (loss) PER SHARE DATA Basic Net income (loss) Weighted-average shares Diluted Net income (loss) Weighted-average shares FINANCIAL POSITION Working capital Total assets Total long-term debt Book value per share 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 $ 6,726.8 5,986.2 645.6 303.1 – 208.3 164.6 (43.9) $ (505.3) $ $ (1.37) 369.0 (1.37) 369.0 33.3 $ $11,514.7 $ 2,480.6 5.23 $ $ 7,182.7 6,155.9 177.7 – – – 126.3 348.8 420.3 $ $ $ 1.17 359.6 1.14 370.6 $ (326.0) $12,362.0 $ 1,531.8 6.68 $ $ 6,417.2 5,608.3 159.5 – – – 99.5 285.3 359.4 $ $ $ 1.02 352.0 0.99 364.6 (3.8) $ $11,225.8 $ 1,085.2 5.86 $ $ 5,492.9 4,817.2 3.3 – – – 86.5 301.7 374.2 $ $ $ 1.08 346.9 1.04 359.4 (89.7) $ $ 9,345.4 721.7 $ 4.91 $ $ 4,850.7 4,396.3 79.6 – 32.2 – 80.0 208.6 168.7 $ $ $ 0.51 333.8 0.49 345.2 (3.5) $ $ 7,959.6 590.5 $ 4.04 $ OTHER DATA Cash dividends — Interpublic Cash dividends per share — Interpublic Number of employees $ $ 129.3 .38 54,100 $ $ 109.1 .37 62,000 $ $ 90.4 .33 54,800 $ $ 76.9 .29 49,500 $ $ 61.2 .25 43,100 54 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements RESULTS BY QUARTER (UNAUDITED) The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) (Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Data) 2001 2000 2001 2000 2001 2000 2001 2000 1ST QUARTER 2ND QUARTER 3RD QUARTER 4TH QUARTER Revenue Operating expenses Restructuring and other merger related costs Goodwill impairment and other charges Income (loss) from operations Investment impairment Interest expense Interest income Other income, net Income (loss) before $1,658.2 1,502.1 $1,585.1 1,453.7 $1,743.4 1,498.4 $1,821.6 1,469.8 $1,605.7 1,501.8 $1,734.2 1,516.0 $1,719.5 1,483.9 $2,041.8 1,716.4 1.5 – 154.6 (160.1) (37.5) 12.8 7.0 36.0 – 95.4 – (24.3) 14.5 3.2 51.3 221.4 (27.7) – (41.4) 10.4 5.0 52.8 – 592.8 81.7 26.7 – – – 62.2 – 299.0 (570.6) 191.5 235.6 263.2 – (26.2) 9.2 21.0 (48.2) (46.9) 6.8 (.7) – (36.5) 11.6 6.3 – (38.8) 13.0 2.4 – (39.3) 22.2 15.7 provision for income taxes (23.2) 88.8 (53.7) 303.0 (659.6) 172.9 212.2 261.8 Provision for (benefit of) income taxes Income applicable to minority interests Equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates Net equity interests Net income (loss) Per share data: Basic EPS Diluted EPS Cash dividends per share — Interpublic Weighted-average shares: Basic Diluted Stock price: High Low 0.5 (6.8) 1.7 (5.1) 37.0 (3.9) 2.2 (1.7) 48.3 (10.6) 127.6 (11.2) (184.7) (2.9) 2.4 (8.2) 2.2 (9.0) .3 (2.6) 72.1 (10.7) .7 (10.0) 92.0 (10.0) 1.0 (9.0) 112.1 (17.0) (19.7) (36.7) $ (28.8) $ 50.1 $ (110.2) $ 166.4 $ (477.5) $ 90.8 $ 111.2 $ 113.0 $ $ $ (.08) (.08) .095 $ $ $ .14 .14 .085 $ $ $ (.30) (.30) .095 $ $ $ .47 .45 .095 $ (1.29) $ (1.29) .095 $ $ $ $ .25 .24 .095 $ $ $ .30 .30 .095 $ $ $ .31 .30 .095 366.1 366.1 355.6 368.0 368.9 368.9 356.7 380.9 369.6 369.6 362.7 373.1 371.3 377.2 363.5 373.3 $ 47.19 $ 32.50 $ 55.56 $ 37.00 $ 38.85 $ 27.79 $ 48.25 $ 38.00 $ 30.46 $ 19.30 $ 44.63 $ 33.50 $ 31.00 $ 19.50 $ 43.75 $ 33.06 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 55 Financial Statements REPORT OF MANAGEMENT The financial statements, including the financial analysis and all other information in this Annual Report, were prepared by management, who is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. Management believes the financial statements, which require the use of certain estimates and judgments, reflect the Company’s financial position and operating results in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. All financial information in this Annual Report is consistent with the financial statements. Management maintains a system of internal accounting controls which provides reasonable assurance that, in all material respects, assets are maintained and accounted for in accordance with management’s authorization, and transactions are recorded accurately in the books and records. To assure the effectiveness of the internal control system, the organizational structure provides for defined lines of responsibility and delegation of authority. The Finance Committee of the Board of Directors, which is comprised of the Company’s Chairman and Chief Financial Officer and four outside Directors, is responsible for defining these lines of responsibility and delegating the authority to management to conduct the day-to-day financial affairs of the Company. In carrying out its duties, the Finance Committee primarily focuses on monitoring financial and operational goals and guidelines; approving and monitoring specific proposals for acquisitions; approving capital expenditures; working capital, cash and balance sheet management; and overseeing the hedging of foreign exchange, interest-rate and other financial risks. The Committee meets regularly to review presentations and reports on these and other financial matters to the Board. It also works closely with, but is separate from, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The Company has formally stated and communicated policies requiring of employees high ethical standards in their conduct of its business. As a further enhancement of the above, the Company’s comprehensive internal audit program is designed for continual evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of its internal controls and measures adherence to established policies and procedures. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is comprised of four directors who are not employees of the Company. The Committee reviews audit plans, internal controls, financial reports and related matters, and meets regularly with management, internal auditors and independent accountants. The independent accountants and the internal auditors have free access to the Audit Committee, without management being present, to discuss the results of their audits or any other matters. The independent accountants, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, were recommended by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and selected by the Board of Directors, and their appointment was ratified by the stockholders. The independent accountants have examined the financial statements of the Company and their opinion is included as part of the financial statements. John J. Dooner Jr. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Sean F. Orr Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 56 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements BOARD OF DIRECTORS FRANK J. BORELLI (1995) 1,2,3,4 REGINALD K. BRACK (1996) 1,2,3,4,5 JILL M. CONSIDINE (1997) 1,2,4,5 Senior Advisor, Former Chairman & Chairman & Retired Chief Financial Chief Executive Officer, Chief Executive Officer, Officer & Director, Marsh & Time, Inc. McLennan Companies, Inc. The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation JOHN J. DOONER, JR. (1995) 3,4 RICHARD A. GOLDSTEIN (2001) 2 H. JOHN GREENIAUS (2001) 2 SEAN F. ORR (2000) 4 Chairman & Chairman & Former Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer, Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer International Flavors Nabisco, Inc. & Fragrances MICHAEL I. ROTH (2002) 1,4 J. PHILLIP SAMPER (1990) 2,5 Chairman & Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer, Gabriel Venture Partners The MONY Group (Year Elected) 1 Audit Committee 2 Compensation Committee 3 Executive Policy Committee 4 Finance Committee 5 Nominating Committee 2001 ANNUAL REPORT THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 57 Board of Directors EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & STOCKHOLDERS’ INFORMATION EXECUTIVE OFFICERS JOHN J. DOONER, JR. Chairman & Chief Executive Officer ALBERT S. CONTE Senior Vice President, Financial Services SUSAN WATSON Senior Vice President, Investor Relations SEAN F. ORR Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer THOMAS A. DOWLING Senior Vice President, Financial Administration GUNNAR P. WILMOT Senior Vice President, BRUCE NELSON Executive Vice President & Chief Marketing Officer PHILIPPE KRAKOWSKY Senior Vice President, BARRY R. LINSKY Executive Vice President NICHOLAS J. CAMERA Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary Director of Corporate Communications C. KENT KROEBER Senior Vice President, Human Resources Planning & Business Development STEVEN BERNS Vice President & Treasurer RICHARD P. SNEEDER, JR. Vice President & Controller CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS: AUTOMATIC DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN: STOCK OWNER INTERNET ACCOUNT ACCESS: 1271 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10020 212.399.8000 TRANSFER AGENT & REGISTRAR FOR COMMON STOCK: First Chicago Trust Company, A Division of EquiServe P.O. Box 2500 Jersey City, NJ 07303-2500 Stock of The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc., is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. At December 31, 2001, there were 18,107 stockholders of record. ANNUAL MEETING: The annual meeting will be held on Monday, May 20, 2002, at 9:30 a.m. in the auditorium of The Equitable Center, 787 Seventh Avenue (between 51st and 52nd Streets) New York, NY 10019. Stock owners of record may access their account via the Internet. By accessing their account they may view share balances, obtain current market price of shares, his- torical stock prices, and the total value of their investment. In addition, they may sell or request issuance of dividend and cash investment plan shares. For information on how to access this secure site, please call EquiServe, toll-free at (877) THE WEB7 (843.9327) or visit www.gateway.equiserve.com. For hearing impaired: 201.222.4955 E-MAIL: equiserve@equiserve.com INTERNET: www.equiserve.com For more information regarding The Interpublic Group of Companies, visit its website at www.interpublic.com. An Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan is offered to all stockholders of record. The Plan, which is administered by Equiserve, provides a way to acquire additional shares of Interpublic Common Stock in a systematic and convenient manner that affords savings in commissions for most stockholders. Those interested in participating in this plan are invited to write for details and an authorization form to: EquiServe Dividend Reinvestment Plan P.O. Box 2598 Jersey City, NJ 07303-2598. FORM 10-K: A copy of the Company’s annual report (Form 10-K) to the Securities and Exchange Commission may be obtained without charge by writing to: Nicholas J. Camera, Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. 1271 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020. Exhibits to the annual report will also be furnished, but will be sent only upon payment of the Company’s reasonable expense in furnishing them. 58 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Executive Officers & Stockholders’ Information Interpublic is one of the world’s largest marketing communications and marketing services companies. Fundamentally, we are in the idea business. We provide clients with customer-driven insights, strategic communications programs and other marketing counsel that will help them build their business. TABLE OF CONTENTS FINANCIAL ANALYSIS MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN McCANN-ERICKSON WORLDGROUP THE PARTNERSHIP FCB GROUP ADVANCED MARKETING SERVICES THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP STRUCTURE PROFESSIONAL ACHIEVEMENTS 2001 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1 2 6 8 10 12 14 16 17 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP, 2001 AS ALWAYS, DIFFICULT TIMES REQUIRE AN UNPRECEDENTED FOCUS ON GETTING THE FUNDAMENTALS RIGHT. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above