Quarterlytics / Utilities / Regulated Electric / The Southern Company

The Southern Company

so · NYSE Utilities
Claim this profile
Ticker so
Exchange NYSE
Sector Utilities
Industry Regulated Electric
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2018 Annual Report · The Southern Company
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Energy for Life

2018 Annual Report

S
o
u
t
h
e
r
n
C
o
m
p
a
n
y

2
0
1
8
A
n
n
u
a

l

R
e
p
o
r
t

SouthernCompany.com

 
 
 
 
 
Shareholder Information

Transfer Agent 

Investor Information 

EQ Shareowner Services is Southern Company’s transfer agent, 

For information about earnings and dividends, stock  

dividend-paying agent, investment plan administrator and registrar. 

If you have questions concerning your registered Southern Company 

quotes and current news releases, please visit us at  
investor.southerncompany.com. 

shareowner account, please contact:

EQ Shareowner Services

1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101

Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120

Telephone: 1.800.554.7626
Website: shareowneronline.com

Southern Company Shareholder Relations 

Telephone: 404.506.0965

Institutional Investor Inquiries 

Southern Company maintains an investor relations office in  

Atlanta, Georgia, 404.506.0901, to meet the information needs  

of institutional investors and securities analysts. 

Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials 

Any stockholder may enroll for electronic delivery of proxy  
materials by logging on at www.icsdelivery.com/so.

Email: shareholderservices@southernco.com

Environmental Information 

Southern Investment Plan 

The Southern Investment Plan is a convenient way to become 

a Southern Company shareholder. Participants in the Plan can 

purchase additional shares in Southern Company through optional 

Southern Company publishes information on its activities to meet 
environmental commitments at www.southerncompany.com/
corporate-responsibility. 

To request printed materials, write to: 

cash purchases and reinvestment of dividends. The Southern 

Director, Environmental Affairs 

Investment Plan prospectus can be found at  
www.southerncompany.com.

Dividend Payments 

Research and Environmental Affairs  

600 North 18th St. 

Bin 14N-8195 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2206 

Southern Company has paid dividends since 1948. Historically, 

dividends are declared and paid quarterly at the discretion of  

Common Stock 

the Board of Directors. 

Annual Meeting 

Southern Company common stock is listed on the NYSE under the 

ticker symbol SO. On December 31, 2018, Southern Company had 

116,135 shareholders of record. 

The 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held Wednesday, 

May 22, at 10 a.m. ET at The Lodge Conference Center at Callaway 

The 2018 annual report is submitted for shareholders’ information. 

Gardens, 4500 Southern Pine Drive, Pine Mountain, Ga. 31822. 

It is not intended for use in connection with any sale or purchase 

Auditors 

Deloitte & Touche LLP  

191 Peachtree St. NE  

Suite 2000  

Atlanta, GA 30303 

of, or any solicitation of, offers to buy or sell securities. 

Visit our website at www.southerncompany.com

Visit our Corporate Responsibility Report at 
www.southerncompany.com/corporate-responsibility 

Follow us on Twitter at www.twitter.com/southerncompany

l

r
e
d
n
a
x
e
A
y
d
n
a
S

:

g
n
i
t
n
i
r
P
k
r
i
K
r
e
t
l
a
W

:

o
t
o
h
P
6
e
g
a
P
f
p
e
n
h
c
S
s
e
m
a
J

:

y
h
p
a
r
g
o
t
o
h
P
s
n
o
i
t
a
c
i
n
u
m
m
o
C
p
a
e
L

:

n
g
i
s
e
D
m
u

l
l

o
C
c
M

l
l

e
r
r
e
T
:
t
n
e
m
e
g
a
n
a
M

t
c
e
j
o
r
P
d
n
a
g
n
i
t
i
r

W

Contents 1 Chairman’s Message 3 Financial Highlights 4 A Culture of Innovation 6 Focused on Fundamentals 8 Leadership 10 Financial ReviewThomas A. FanningChairman, President & CEO, Southern Company 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chairman’s Message

Dear fellow shareholders,

At Southern Company, we like to say that we are “bigger than 

Excel at the Fundamentals

our bottom line” and “customers are at the center of all we do.” 

More than mere slogans, these ideas are deeply rooted in our 

culture and genuinely embraced by employees throughout the 

Southern Company system. That’s because our employees  

understand that the energy solutions we provide undergird the 

lives and commercial endeavors of the more than nine million  

customers we are privileged to serve, the communities in 

which they live and the businesses where they are employed. 

Energy to heat and cool homes. Energy to empower businesses 

and industry. Energy for Life.

2018 was a year of significant accomplishment for Southern 

Company. For the year, on an adjusted basis, our company 

earned $3.13 billion, or $3.07 a share, compared with adjusted 

earnings of $3.02 billion, or $3.02 per share, in 2017. For 71  

consecutive years, dating back to 1948, Southern Company  

We continued our longstanding track record of providing  

outstanding customer service. J.D. Power, which ranks  

companies based on power quality and reliability, price,  

billing and payment, corporate citizenship, communications 

and customer service, rated Georgia Power the number one 

large electric utility in the South Region for both residential 

and business customer satisfaction. Nicor Gas was recently 

named a most trusted utility brand for residential customers  

by the Cogent Report.

Nicor Gas also replaced its last cast iron natural gas main in 

2018 as part of a longstanding upgrade program. Today, Nicor 

Gas has no known low pressure cast iron in its system, helping 

to ensure the long-term safety and reliability of natural gas 

service for its customers.

has paid 285 consecutive quarterly dividends that have been 

In collaboration with Southern Company Research and  

equal to or greater than the dividend paid in the prior quarter.

Development, Alabama Power and Mississippi Power deployed 

We have successfully completed more than $11 billion  

in strategic, value-accretive transactions, including the  

divestitures of Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, Florida City Gas, 

Pivotal Home Solutions and other assets. In December, Southern 

Power entered into a partnership with three of the largest  

tax equity partners in the U.S. – Bank of America, JP Morgan 

and Wells Fargo – for an interest in substantially all of its  
operating wind portfolio. And on January 1, 2019, we closed 

on the sale of Gulf Power. These decisive actions served to 

strengthen our balance sheet, substantially reduce our projected 

equity needs and remove significant risk from our financing 

plans. We believe these transactions also position our company 

for future growth.

Tax reform was a topic of much discussion to start 2018.  

We reached timely, innovative and constructive outcomes with 

regulators in multiple jurisdictions that have paved the way 

to deliver approximately $1.8 billion in benefits to customers 

while simultaneously preserving our credit quality and  

improving earnings per share. 

Edge of Network Grid Optimization (ENGO) devices in Meridian, 

Mississippi and western Alabama. These new voltage-limiting 

devices enhance system flexibility by allowing for finer control 

of distribution voltage than was previously possible.

Finally, we believe Southern Company is at its best when things 

are at their worst. Our subsidiaries provided outstanding storm 

response during an especially active hurricane season, deploying  
crews across our system to restore power after Hurricane 

Michael, as well as helping our neighbors in the Carolinas with 

restoration efforts following Hurricane Florence, and finishing 

the work begun in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. 

Achieve Success with Major Construction Projects

At Georgia Power’s Plant Vogtle, the first new nuclear reactors 

to be built in the U.S. in three decades are under construction 

near Waynesboro, Georgia. In the first full year with Southern 

Nuclear as the project’s general contractor – in partnership with 

Bechtel – we saw significant progress in the construction of 

Plant Vogtle units 3 and 4 and we achieved our principal year-

Further highlights of 2018 are perhaps best shared through a 

end construction targets. Taking into consideration engineering, 

brief review of the progress we achieved in each of our five 
strategic priorities:

procurement and the initial test plan, the new Vogtle units are 
approximately 75 percent complete as of this writing.

Southern Company 2018 Annual Report

1

Chairman’s Message (continued)

This past summer, we announced that Southern Nuclear revised 

through features that can be managed by smart devices and 

the estimated cost to complete the project and recalibrated 

voice activation.

site production expectations with a site-wide project reset. 

Since then, we have seen marked improvement in construction 

productivity at the site, with substantial momentum as we 

finished the year. Much hard work remains in order to sustain 

this momentum, but we are pleased with the project’s progress 

and remain confident that the project will meet the in-service 

dates of November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for 

Unit 4 that were approved by regulators. 

Our fiber optics subsidiary, Southern Telecom, has entered into 

an agreement with Atlanta-based GigSouth to provide dark 

fiber that will expand that company’s current network, bringing 

high-speed internet and reliable bandwidth to underserved 

rural communities throughout the Southeast.  

Value and Develop Our People

Diversity and inclusion continue to be key focus areas for 

Support the Building of a National Energy Policy

Southern Company. Each of our operating companies is focused 

We continue to be engaged in public policy debate and  

constructive dialogue with legislators and regulators to  

advocate for a comprehensive national energy policy that 

promotes innovation and financial integrity in today’s evolving 

energy landscape – one that benefits both customers and our 

businesses. Our belief is that public policy can serve as a  

catalyst to support job creation and enhanced personal  

incomes, improving the lives of individuals and families 

throughout the nation.

Promote Energy Innovation

Even as new technologies, changing customer expectations  

and an evolving regulatory environment challenge conventional 

business models in our industry, we continue to innovate on 

multiple fronts. 

In addition to the new nuclear units at Plant Vogtle, Southern 

Company subsidiaries continue to add new renewable energy 

resources as we pursue our goal of low- to no-carbon operations 

by 2050. Georgia Power recently filed its triennial Integrated 

Resource Plan with the Georgia Public Service Commission,  

a 20-year outlook that includes a request to provide up  

to 1,000 megawatts of new renewable energy capacity.  

If approved, Georgia Power’s total renewable energy capacity 

on cultivating a culture of inclusion that acknowledges and 

values the uniqueness of its employees. Their multi-pronged 

approach includes the formation of diversity and inclusion 

councils, employee resource groups, training and development, 

education and awareness, inclusive benefits and policies and 

diverse community partnerships. This great work has been  

validated by external observers as Southern Company was 

once again recognized as one of the “Top 50 Companies for 

Diversity” in 2018 by both DiversityInc and Black Enterprise.

We also completed a system-wide Voice of the Employee 

survey in 2018. This survey indicated a high level of employee 

engagement, with a high percentage of employees indicating 

that they would recommend Southern Company as a great 

place to work. 

In conclusion, the foundation of our business remains strong. 

Our customer-focused business model – with an emphasis on 

outstanding reliability, best-in-class customer service and rates 

well below the national average – continues to be the corner-

stone for delivering value to customers and shareholders alike. 

Our experienced management team has a long track record of 

successfully executing on this time-tested business model, and 

we believe our company is poised for continued success, both 

today and in the years ahead.

would increase to 18 percent of its already diverse generation  

Thank you for your confidence in Southern Company. 

portfolio by 2024.

It is a privilege to serve you.

Alabama Power’s new Smart Neighborhood Builder Program 

Sincerely,

partners with homebuilders to build energy efficient homes 

that feature advanced energy products and home automation. 

These future-focused communities are designed to make  
customers’ lives more comfortable, convenient and connected 

Thomas A. Fanning

March 19, 2019

2

Southern Company 2018 Annual Report

Financial Highlights

2.60

2.57

2.19

2.18

0.84

2.80

2.89

2.90

3.02

3.07

  ’14 

’15 

’16 

’17 

’18

  ’14 

’15 

’16 

’17 

’18

Basic Earnings Per Share

(in dollars)

Basic Earnings Per Share–Excluding Items*

(in dollars)

*  Not a financial measure under generally accepted accounting principles.  

See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Metric on page 16 for additional 

information and specific adjustments made to this measure by year.

11.68

10.80

10.08

3.44

9.11

2.08

2.15

2.22

2.30

2.38

  ’14 

’15 

’16 

’17 

’18

  ’14 

’15 

’16 

’17 

’18

Return On Average Common Equity

(percent)

Dividends Per Share

(in dollars)

2018 

2017  

Change

Operating Revenues (in millions) 

Earnings (in millions) 

Basic Earnings Per Share 

Diluted Earnings Per Share 

Dividends Per Share (amount paid) 

Dividend Yield (year-end, percent) 

Average Shares Outstanding (in millions) 

Return On Average Common Equity (percent) 

Book Value Per Share 

Market Price Per Share (year-end, closing) 

$23,495  

$2,226  

$2.18  

$2.17  

$2.38 

5.4 

1,020 

9.11 

$23.91  

$43.92  

Total Market Value Of Common Stock (year-end, in millions) 

$45,404  

Total Assets (in millions) 

Total Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions) 

Retail 

  Wholesale 

Total Utility Customers (year-end, in thousands) 

$116,914  

212,144 

162,181  

49,963  

8,933  

$23,031  

$842  

$0.84  

$0.84  

$2.30 

4.8 

1,000 

3.44 

$23.99  

$48.09  

$48,456  

$111,005  

205,541 

156,507  

49,034  

9,263  

2.0)%

164.4)%

159.5)%

158.3)%

3.5)%

12.5)%

2.0)%

164.8)%

(0.3)%

(8.7)%

(6.3)%

5.3)%

3.2)%

3.6)%

1.9)%

(3.6)%

Southern Company 2018 Annual Report

3

 
 
 
Our Culture of Innovation Helps To Secure

A Better Energy Future

Creative problem-solving, strategic investments and industry-leading 

research and development are inextricably tied to our long-standing 

commitment to customers.

Innovation is in our DNA. For over 100 years, we’ve been answering the questions of today  

to meet the energy needs of tomorrow. That tradition of out-of-the-box thinking continues  

as we strive constantly to refine operations and deliver best-in-class customer service.  

We are innovating on multiple fronts as employees and businesses across the system execute 

big ideas to build the future of energy.

In 2016, for example, Southern Company acquired PowerSecure, a leading provider of  

distributed energy infrastructure, energy efficiency solutions and utility infrastructure  

services. With advanced smart grid capabilities, microgrid controls, energy storage, switchgear 

and service solutions, PowerSecure is helping meet the evolving, technology-driven energy 

requirements of commercial, industrial and institutional customers in the digital economy.

In 2017, Greentech Media reported that PowerSecure had become the largest commercial  

microgrid developer in the U.S. In 2018, PowerSecure celebrated the completion of the  

first-of-its-kind biogas microgrid at Butler Farms in rural Lillington, North Carolina. The farm 

captures and burns methane gas from manure in order to create renewable energy called 

biogas. PowerSecure designed and engineered a custom, turnkey energy storage and controls 

solutions for the microgrid.

Along with Georgia Power, PowerSecure also announced partnerships with the U.S. military to 

help make military bases more energy independent and resilient. 

Elsewhere, Southern Company hosted the 2018 Smart Cities Summit in Atlanta, showcasing 

new technologies and energy solutions. Attendees from around the world learned about our 

system’s public safety, energy efficiency, lighting and infrastructure initiatives.

And, of course, the Southern Company system continues to grow its portfolio of renewable 

energy sources. Ten years ago, renewables made up only one percent of our energy mix 

whereas renewables now account for 10 percent of that output. In all, Southern Company  

has invested nearly $20 billion in developing a low-carbon future.

Top Left: PowerSecure staff inspect a PowerBlock® generation unit in Plano, Texas;  
Center: Southern Company subsidiary Southern Power owns more than 1,920 megawatts  
of wind generating capacity at 11 facilities, including facilities under construction;  
Bottom: Southern Company is actively involved in the research and development of on-road  
and off-road electric vehicles and equipment. The U.S. Department of Energy is projecting 
225,000 plug-in electric vehicles in the Atlanta metro area alone by 2030.

4

Southern Company 2018 Annual Report

Microgrids and Battery Storage

Southern Company and its subsidiaries are leading  
the way in microgrid development throughout the U.S. 
and Puerto Rico, and the company is at the forefront  
of accelerating the development and deployment of  
energy storage systems.

Seen here are Kim Nguyen, research engineer with 
Southern Company Services Research and Develop-
ment (left), and Natalie Clark, solar project manager 
for Southern Power (right), at Alabama Power’s Smart 
Neighborhood™ community-scale microgrid at  
Reynolds Landing near Hoover, Alabama.

Southern Company 2018 Annual Report

5

Energy Mix (percent)*

2007 

2018

Coal 

Natural Gas  

Nuclear  

Hydro, Wind, Solar 

69  

16  

14 

1 

* Includes non-affiliate power purchase agreements.

27

47

15

11

6

Southern Company 2018 Annual Report

 
Our Keen Focus On Fundamentals Drives

Customer Satisfaction

Southern Company experienced outstanding operational performance 

across the enterprise during 2018, coupled with industry-leading  

customer satisfaction.

Southern Company subsidiaries continued to deliver clean, safe, reliable and affordable energy 

to customers in 2018, even as we continued to transition our electric fleet to new sources of 

generation and move toward a low-carbon future.

Near Waynesboro, Georgia, work continues on Plant Vogtle units 3 and 4, the first new nuclear 

facilities to be built in the U.S. in 30 years. Major 2018 milestones for Unit 3 included the setting 

of the final reactor coolant pump, placement of the third and final containment ring and the 

setting of the main control room roof. At Unit 4, the pressurizer and second steam generator 

were set inside the containment vessel. Currently, Unit 3 is expected to achieve commercial 

operation by November of 2021, with Unit 4 expected to come online by November of 2022.

Elsewhere, a unified approach to modernizing the electric power grid is designed to improve 

how our electric utilities transmit and distribute energy. These efforts will help leverage  

operational and information technology to reduce the cost of maintaining infrastructure  

and enhance customer value through improved reliability and resiliency.

Georgia Power was rated the number one large electric utility in the South Region for customer 

satisfaction by J.D. Power, based on power quality and reliability, price, billing and payment, 

corporate citizenship, communications and customer service. Nicor Gas was recently named  

a most trusted brand for residential customers by the Cogent Report.

2018 was also a busy year for storm recovery, as multiple subsidiaries were involved in  

significant power restoration efforts. Teams from Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi 

Power and PowerSecure worked tirelessly to restore power – and hope – to the people of 

Puerto Rico following Hurricane Maria. Crews also assisted with recovery efforts in the  

Carolinas following Hurricane Florence.

Of course, Southern Company’s commitment to customers and communities goes far beyond 

the energy solutions and service we provide. In 2018, employees contributed more than 

257,000 volunteer hours to community service, while Southern Company and its subsidiaries 

contributed $57.7 million in corporate giving.

The view from the operating deck of the Plant Vogtle Unit 3 containment vessel, currently 
under construction near Waynesboro, Georgia. Plant Vogtle units 3 and 4 will be the first new 
nuclear units to be built in the U.S. in three decades. When units 3 and 4 are completed, the 
Vogtle site is expected to produce enough clean, safe, reliable and affordable electricity to 
power 1 million Georgia homes and businesses for decades to come. 

Southern Company 2018 Annual Report

7

Board of Directors

Thomas A. Fanning

Janaki Akella 

Juanita Powell Baranco 

Jon A. Boscia 

Henry A. Clark III

Anthony F. Earley, Jr.

David J. Grain 

Veronica M. Hagen 

Donald M. James 

John D. Johns 

Dale E. Klein 

Ernest J. Moniz

William G. Smith, Jr.

Steven R. Specker 

Larry D. Thompson 

E. Jenner Wood III

Management Council

 Thomas A. Fanning

W. Paul Bowers 

 Stanley W. Connally, Jr.

Mark A. Crosswhite 

Andrew W. Evans

 Kimberly S. Greene

 James Y. Kerr II

Stephen E. Kuczynski 

Mark S. Lantrip

Anthony L. Wilson 

Christopher C. Womack 

8

Southern Company 2018 Annual Report

Board of Directors

Thomas A. Fanning
Chairman, President and CEO, Southern Company
Atlanta, GA | Age 62 | elected 2010

Janaki Akella
Digital Transformation Leader
Google LLC (technology)
Palo Alto, CA | Age 58 | elected 2019

Juanita Powell Baranco
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Baranco Automotive Group (automobile sales)
Atlanta, GA | Age 70 | elected 2006

Jon A. Boscia
Retired Founder and President 
Boardroom Advisors, LLC (board governance consulting firm)
Sarasota, FL | Age 66 | elected 2007

Henry A. Clark III
Retired Senior Advisor, Evercore Inc. (corporate finance advisory firm)
Hobe Sound, FL | Age 69 | elected 2009

Anthony F. Earley, Jr.
Retired Chairman, President and CEO
PG&E Corporation (utility)
Bloomfield Hills, MI | Age 69 | elected 2019

David J. Grain
CEO and Managing Director 
Grain Management, LLC (private equity firm)
Sarasota, FL | Age 56 | elected 2012

Donald M. James
Retired Chairman and CEO, Vulcan Materials Company (construction materials)
Pensacola, FL | Age 70 | elected 1999

John D. Johns
Executive Chairman, Protective Life Corporation (insurance)
Birmingham, AL | Age 67 | elected 2015

Dale E. Klein
Associate Vice Chancellor of Research, University of Texas System
Retired Chairman, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (energy)
Austin, TX | Age 71 | elected 2010

Ernest J. Moniz
Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics and Engineering Systems emeritus, 
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
CEO and Co-Chair, Nuclear Threat Initiative (energy)
Former U.S. Secretary of Energy
Brookline, MA | Age 74 | elected 2018

William G. Smith, Jr.
Chairman, President and CEO, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (banking)
Tallahassee, FL | Age 65 | elected 2006

Steven R. Specker
Lead Independent Director, Southern Company Board
Retired CEO, TAE Technologies, Inc. (energy technology)
Scottsdale, AZ | Age 73 | elected 2010

Larry D. Thompson
Counsel, Finch McCranie, LLP (attorney)
Atlanta, GA | Age 73 | elected 2014

Veronica M. Hagen
Retired President and CEO, Polymer Group, Inc. (engineered materials)
Laguna Niguel, CA | Age 73 | elected 2008

E. Jenner Wood III
Retired Executive Vice President –Wholesale Banking, SunTrust Banks, Inc. (banking)
Atlanta, GA | Age 67 | elected 2012

Management Council

Thomas A. Fanning 
Chairman, President and CEO 
Fanning, 62, joined the company in 1980

W. Paul Bowers 
Chairman, President and CEO, Georgia Power 
Bowers, 62, joined the company in 1979

Stanley W. Connally, Jr.
Executive Vice President, Operations, Southern Company Services, Inc.
Connally, 49, joined the company in 1989

Mark A. Crosswhite 
Chairman, President and CEO, Alabama Power
Crosswhite, 56, joined the company in 2004

Andrew W. Evans
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Evans, 52, has held his current role since June 2018

Kimberly S. Greene
Chairman, President and CEO, Southern Company Gas
Greene, 52, has held her current role since June 2018

James Y. Kerr II
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Chief Compliance Officer
Kerr, 55, joined the company in March 2014

Stephen E. Kuczynski 
Chairman, President and CEO, Southern Nuclear 
Kuczynski, 56, joined the company in July 2011

Mark S. Lantrip
Executive Vice President  
Chairman, President and CEO, Southern Company Services, Inc.
Chairman, President and CEO, Southern Power
Lantrip, 64, joined the company in 1981

Anthony L. Wilson 
Chairman, President and CEO, Mississippi Power 
Wilson, 55, joined the company in 1984

Christopher C. Womack 
Executive Vice President and President, External Affairs 
Womack, 61, joined the company in 1988

9

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportFinancial Contents

Definitions

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Metric

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Available Information

Southern Company Business

Southern Company Common Stock Information

Five-Year Cumulative Performance Graph

11

16

18

19

20

21

21

22 Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

23

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

24 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and  

Results of Operations

Consolidated Statements of Income

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Capitalization

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

Index to the Notes to Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

74

75

76

78

80

82

84

85

222

Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data 2014-2018

10

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportDefinitions

2013 ARP

Alternative Rate Plan approved by the Georgia PSC in 2013 for 

Georgia Power for the years 2014 through 2016 and subsequently 

extended through 2019

AFUDC

CO2
Carbon dioxide

COD

Commercial operation date

Allowance for funds used during construction

Contractor Settlement Agreement

Alabama Power

Alabama Power Company

The December 31, 2015 agreement between Westinghouse and 

the Vogtle Owners resolving disputes between the Vogtle Owners 

and the EPC Contractor under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement

AMEA

Alabama Municipal Electric Authority

Cooperative Energy

Electric cooperative in Mississippi

AOCI

CPCN

Accumulated other comprehensive income

Certificate of public convenience and necessity

ARO

Asset retirement obligation

ASC

Customer Refunds

Refunds issued to Georgia Power customers in 2018 as ordered by 

the Georgia PSC related to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement

Accounting Standards Codification

CWIP

ASU

Accounting Standards Update

Atlanta Gas Light

Construction work in progress

Dalton

City of Dalton, Georgia, an incorporated municipality in the State 

of Georgia, acting by and through its Board of Water, Light, and 

Atlanta Gas Light Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of 

Sinking Fund Commissioners

Southern Company Gas

Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Dalton Pipeline

A pipeline facility in Georgia in which Southern Company Gas has a 

Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, a joint venture to construct and 

operate a natural gas pipeline in which Southern Company Gas has 

50% undivided ownership interest

a 5% ownership interest

Bcf

Billion cubic feet

Bechtel

DOE

U.S. Department of Energy

EBIT

Earnings before interest and taxes

Bechtel Power Corporation, the primary contractor for the 

ECM

remaining construction activities for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4

Mississippi Power’s energy cost management clause

Bechtel Agreement

ECO Plan

The October 23, 2017 construction completion agreement 

Mississippi Power’s environmental compliance overview plan

between the Vogtle Owners and Bechtel

CCR

Coal combustion residuals

CCR Rule

Eligible Project Costs

Certain costs of construction relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 

4 that are eligible for financing under the loan guarantee program 

established under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005

Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities final 

EPA

rule published by the EPA in 2015

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Chattanooga Gas

EPC Contractor

Chattanooga Gas Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of 

Westinghouse and its affiliate, WECTEC Global Project Services Inc.; 

Southern Company Gas

the former engineering, procurement, and construction contractor 

for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4

11

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportDefinitions

FASB

Financial Accounting Standards Board

FERC

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

FFB

Federal Financing Bank

Fitch

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

FMPA

Florida Municipal Power Agency

GAAP

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles

Georgia Power

Georgia Power Company

Illinois Commission

Illinois Commerce Commission

Interim Assessment Agreement

Agreement entered into by the Vogtle Owners and the EPC 

Contractor to allow construction to continue after the EPC 

Contractor’s bankruptcy filing

Internal Revenue Code

Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended

IPP

Independent Power Producer

IRP

Integrated Resource Plan

IRS

Internal Revenue Service

ITAAC

Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case

Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria, standards 

Georgia Power’s base rate case scheduled to be filed by 

established by the NRC

July 1, 2019

Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement

A settlement agreement between Georgia Power and the staff of 

ITC

Investment tax credit

the Georgia PSC regarding the retail rate impact of the Tax Reform 

JEA

Legislation, as approved by the Georgia PSC on April 3, 2018

Jacksonville Electric Authority

GHG

Greenhouse gas

KUA

Kissimmee Utility Authority

Guarantee Settlement Agreement

The June 9, 2017 settlement agreement between the Vogtle 

Owners and Toshiba related to certain payment obligations of the 

EPC Contractor guaranteed by Toshiba

Gulf Power

Gulf Power Company

Heating Degree Days

A measure of weather, calculated when the average daily 

temperatures are less than 65 degrees Fahrenheit

Heating Season

The period from November through March when Southern 

Company Gas’ natural gas usage and operating revenues are 

generally higher

HLBV

Hypothetical liquidation at book value

IGCC

KW

Kilowatt

KWH

Kilowatt-hour

LIBOR

London Interbank Offered Rate

LIFO

Last-in, first-out

LNG

Liquefied natural gas

Loan Guarantee Agreement

Loan guarantee agreement entered into by Georgia Power with 

the DOE in 2014, under which the proceeds of borrowings may be 

used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs incurred 

in connection with its construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4

Integrated coal gasification combined cycle, the technology 

LOCOM

originally approved for Mississippi Power’s Kemper County energy 

Lower of weighted average cost or current market price

facility (Plant Ratcliffe)

12

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportDefinitions

LTSA

Long-term service agreement

Marketers

Nicor Gas

Northern Illinois Gas Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of 

Southern Company Gas

Marketers selling retail natural gas in Georgia and certificated by 

the Georgia PSC

MEAG

NOX
Nitrogen oxide

NRC

Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Merger

NYMEX

The merger, effective July 1, 2016, of a wholly-owned, direct 

New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc.

subsidiary of Southern Company with and into Southern Company 

Gas, with Southern Company Gas continuing as the surviving 

corporation

MGP

Manufactured gas plant

Mississippi Power

Mississippi Power Company

mmBtu

Million British thermal units

Moody’s

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

MPUS

Mississippi Public Utilities Staff

MRA

Municipal and Rural Associations

MW

Megawatt

MWH

Megawatt hour

NYSE

New York Stock Exchange

OCI

Other comprehensive income

OPC

Oglethorpe Power Corporation (an Electric 

Membership Corporation)

OTC

Over-the-counter

OUC

Orlando Utilities Commission

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act

PennEast Pipeline

PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC, a joint venture to construct and 

operate a natural gas pipeline in which Southern Company Gas has 

a 20% ownership interest

PEP

Mississippi Power’s Performance Evaluation Plan

natural gas distribution utilities

Piedmont

Southern Company Gas’ natural gas distribution utilities (Nicor 

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.

Gas, Atlanta Gas Light, Virginia Natural Gas, Elizabethtown 

Gas, Florida City Gas, Chattanooga Gas, and Elkton Gas as of 

June 30, 2018) (Nicor Gas, Atlanta Gas Light, Virginia Natural Gas, 

and Chattanooga Gas as of July 29, 2018)

Pivotal Home Solutions

Nicor Energy Services Company, until June 4, 2018 a wholly-owned 

subsidiary of Southern Company Gas, doing business as Pivotal 

Home Solutions

NCCR

Georgia Power’s Nuclear Construction Cost Recovery

Pivotal Utility Holdings

NDR

Pivotal Utility Holdings, Inc., until July 29, 2018 a wholly-

owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas, doing business 

Alabama Power’s Natural Disaster Reserve

as Elizabethtown Gas (until July 1, 2018), Elkton Gas (until 

July 1, 2018), and Florida City Gas

NextEra Energy

NextEra Energy, Inc.

13

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportDefinitions

power pool

ROE

The operating arrangement whereby the integrated generating 

Return on equity

resources of the traditional electric operating companies and 

Southern Power (excluding subsidiaries) are subject to joint 

S&P

commitment and dispatch in order to serve their combined load 

S&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global Inc.

obligations

PowerSecure

PowerSecure Inc.

PowerSouth

SCS

Southern Company Services, Inc. (the Southern Company system 

service company)

SEC

PowerSouth Energy Cooperative

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

PPA

Power purchase agreements, as well as, for Southern Power, 

contracts for differences that provide the owner of a renewable 

facility a certain fixed price for the electricity sold to the grid

PRP

Pipeline Replacement Program, Atlanta Gas Light’s 15-year 

infrastructure replacement program, which ended in December 

2013

PSC

Public Service Commission

PTC

Production tax credit

Rate CNP

Alabama Power’s Rate Certificated New Plant

Rate CNP Compliance

Alabama Power’s Rate Certificated New Plant Compliance

Rate CNP PPA

Alabama Power’s Rate Certificated New Plant Power Purchase 

Agreement

Rate ECR

Alabama Power’s Rate Energy Cost Recovery

Rate NDR

Alabama Power’s Rate Natural Disaster Reserve

Rate RSE

Alabama Power’s Rate Stabilization and Equalization

registrants

Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi 

Power, Southern Power Company, and Southern Company Gas

SEGCO

Southern Electric Generating Company

SNG

Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.

SO2
Sulfur dioxide

Southern Company

The Southern Company

Southern Company Gas

Southern Company Gas and its subsidiaries

Southern Company Gas Capital

Southern Company Gas Capital Corporation, a 100%-owned 

subsidiary of Southern Company Gas

Southern Company Gas Dispositions

Southern Company Gas’ disposition of Pivotal Home Solutions, 

Pivotal Utility Holdings’ disposition of Elizabethtown Gas and 

Elkton Gas, and NUI Corporation’s disposition of Pivotal Utility 

Holdings, which primarily consisted of Florida City Gas

Southern Company system

Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, 

Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), 

SEGCO, Southern Nuclear, SCS, Southern Linc, PowerSecure (as of 

May 9, 2016), and other subsidiaries

Southern Holdings

Southern Company Holdings, Inc.

Southern Linc

Southern Communications Services, Inc.

Southern Nuclear

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

revenue from contracts with customers

Revenue from contracts accounted for under the guidance of ASC 

Southern Power

606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Southern Power Company and its subsidiaries

14

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportDefinitions

SouthStar

SouthStar Energy Services, LLC

SP Solar

SP Solar Holdings I, LP

SP Wind

SP Wind Holdings II, LLC

SRR

VIE

Variable interest entity

Virginia Commission

Virginia State Corporation Commission

Virginia Natural Gas

Virginia Natural Gas, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern 

Company Gas

Mississippi Power’s System Restoration Rider, a tariff for retail 

Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement

property damage reserve

STRIDE

Atlanta Gas Light’s Strategic Infrastructure Development and 

Agreement entered into with the EPC Contractor in 2008 by 

Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, 

and rejected in bankruptcy in July 2017, pursuant to which the 

EPC Contractor agreed to design, engineer, procure, construct, and 

Enhancement program

Tax Reform Legislation

test Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4

Vogtle Owners

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which became effective on 

Georgia Power, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, MEAG, and Dalton

January 1, 2018

Toshiba

Toshiba Corporation, parent company of Westinghouse

traditional electric operating companies

Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power 

through December 31, 2018; Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and 

Mississippi Power as of January 1, 2019

Triton

Triton Container Investments, LLC

VCM

Vogtle Construction Monitoring

Vogtle Services Agreement

The June 9, 2017 services agreement between the Vogtle 

Owners and the EPC Contractor, as amended and restated on 

July 20, 2017, for the EPC Contractor to transition construction 

management of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to Southern Nuclear 

and to provide ongoing design, engineering, and procurement 

services to Southern Nuclear

WACOG

Weighted average cost of gas

Westinghouse

Westinghouse Electric Company LLC

15

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportReconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Metric

(In millions, except earnings per share)
Net Income - GAAP
Average Shares Outstanding
Basic Earnings Per Share

Net Income - GAAP

Non-GAAP Excluding Items:

Estimated Loss on Plants Under Construction(1)

Tax Impact

Loss on Plant Scherer Unit 3(2)

Tax Impact

Acquisition, Disposition, and Integration Impacts(3)

Tax Impact

Wholesale Gas Services(4)

Tax Impact

Litigation Settlement Costs (Proceeds)(5)

Tax Impact

Equity Return Related to Kemper IGCC Schedule Extension(6)

Tax Impact

Adoption of Tax Reform(7)
Net Income - Excluding Items
Basic Earnings Per Share - Excluding Items

2018
$2,226
1,020
$ 2.18

Year Ended December 31,
2016
$2,448
951
$ 2.57

2015
$2,367
910
$ 2.60

2017
$ 842
1,000
$ 0.84

2014
$1,963
897
$ 2.19

$2,226

$ 842

$ 2,448

$ 2,367

$ 1,963

1,102
(376)
—
—
(35)
294
(42)
4
(24)
6
—
—
(27)
$3,128
$ 3.07

3,366
(975)
33
(13)
35
12
57
—
—
—
(47)
(9)
(284)
$3,017
$ 3.02

428
(164)
—
—
120
(38)
4
(4)
—
—
(29)
(5)
—
$2,760
$ 2.90

365
(139)
—
—
41
(10)
—
—
7
(3)
—
—
—
$2,628
$ 2.89

895
(342)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$2,516
$ 2.80

(1)  Net income for all periods presented includes charges and associated legal expenses related to Mississippi Power’s construction and abandonment of the 
Kemper IGCC. Additionally, the year ended December 31, 2018 includes a $95 million credit to net income primarily resulting from the reduction of a 
state income tax valuation allowance recorded in 2017 related to a net operating loss carryforward associated with the Kemper IGCC. Net income for the 
year ended December 31, 2014 also includes the effect of reversing revenues previously recognized in 2014 and 2013 as a result of the 2015 Mississippi 
Supreme Court decision that reversed the Mississippi PSC’s March 2013 Kemper IGCC rate order. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2018 
includes a $1.1 billion charge ($0.8 billion after tax) for an estimated probable loss on Georgia Power’s construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. These 
items significantly impacted net income and earnings per share. Additional pre-tax closure costs, including mine reclamation, of up to $25 million for 
Mississippi Power’s Kemper IGCC may occur through 2020. Mississippi Power is also currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the 
CO2 pipeline and is in discussions with the DOE regarding property closeout and disposition, for which the related costs could be material. Further charges 
for Georgia Power’s Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 may occur; however, the amount and timing of any such charges is uncertain. 

(2)  Net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes a $32.5 million write-down ($20 million after tax) of Gulf Power’s ownership of Plant Scherer 

Unit 3 as a result of a retail rate case settlement.

(3)  Net income for the year ended December 31, 2018 includes: (i) a net combined $291 million pre-tax gain ($51 million after-tax loss) on the sales of 

Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, Florida City Gas, and Pivotal Home Solutions by Southern Company Gas; (ii) a $42 million (pre tax and after tax) goodwill 
impairment charge associated with the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions; (iii) a $119 million pre-tax ($89 million after tax) impairment charge associated 
with Southern Power’s disposition of Plants Stanton and Oleander; and (iv) $95 million pre tax ($77 million after tax) of other acquisition, disposition, and 
integration costs. Net income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 includes costs related to the acquisition and integration of Southern 
Company Gas and net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 also includes costs related to the dispositions of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas. 
Additionally, net income for the year ended December 31, 2016 includes costs related to the acquisitions of PowerSecure International, Inc. and the 50% 
interest in SNG. Further impacts are expected to be recorded in 2019 including a preliminary gain of $2.5 billion pre tax ($1.3 billion after tax) in connection 
with the sale of Gulf Power, as well as impacts related to Southern Power’s announced sale of Plant Mankato. Further costs are also expected to continue 
to occur in connection with the integration of Southern Company Gas; however, the amount and duration of such expenditures is uncertain.

(4)  Net income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 includes the Wholesale Gas Services business of Southern Company Gas. Presenting 

net income and earnings per share excluding Wholesale Gas Services provides investors with an additional measure of operating performance that excludes 
the volatility resulting from mark-to-market and lower of weighted average cost or current market price accounting adjustments.

(5)  Net income for the year ended December 31, 2018 includes the settlement proceeds of Mississippi Power’s claim for lost revenue resulting from the 2010 
Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Additionally, net income for the year ended December 31, 2015 includes additional costs related to the 
discontinued operations of Mirant Corporation and a related March 2009 litigation settlement. 

16

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportReconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Metric (continued)

(6)  Net income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 includes AFUDC equity as a result of extending the schedule for the Kemper IGCC 

construction project beyond the dates assumed when Southern Company’s 2016 and 2017 earnings guidance was initially presented. AFUDC equity ceased 
in connection with the project’s suspension in June 2017. Southern Company believes presentation of earnings per share excluding these adjustments 
provided investors with information comparable to guidance. Management also used such measures to evaluate Southern Company’s performance.

(7)  Net income for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 includes net tax benefits as a result of implementing the Tax Reform Legislation. 

During 2018, Southern Company obtained and analyzed additional information that was not initially available or reported as provisional amounts at 
December 31, 2017. Additional adjustments are not expected. Southern Company believes presentation of earnings per share excluding these amounts 
provided investors with information comparable to guidance. Management also used such measures to evaluate Southern Company’s performance.

17

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportCautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Southern Company’s 2018 Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other 

things, statements concerning regulated rates, the strategic goals for the business, customer and sales growth, economic conditions, fuel 

and environmental cost recovery and other rate actions, projected equity ratios, current and proposed environmental regulations and 

related compliance plans and estimated expenditures, pending or potential litigation matters, access to sources of capital, projections 

for the qualified pension plans, postretirement benefit plans, and nuclear decommissioning trust fund contributions, financing activities, 

completion dates of construction projects, completion of announced dispositions, filings with state and federal regulatory authorities, 

federal and state income tax benefits, estimated sales and purchases under power sale and purchase agreements, and estimated 

construction plans and expenditures. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” 

“could,” “would,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue” or the 

negative of these terms or other similar terminology. There are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from 

those suggested by the forward-looking statements; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such indicated results will be realized. 

These factors include:

 O the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory changes, including environmental laws and regulations, and also changes in 

tax (including the Tax Reform Legislation) and other laws and regulations to which Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject, 

as well as changes in application of existing laws and regulations;

 O the extent and timing of costs and liabilities to comply with federal and state laws, regulations, and legal requirements related to CCR, 

including amounts for required closure of ash ponds and ground water monitoring;

 O current and future litigation or regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries, including litigation and other disputes related to the 

Kemper County energy facility;

 O the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which Southern Company’s subsidiaries operate, 

including from the development and deployment of alternative energy sources;

 O variations in demand for electricity and natural gas;

 O available sources and costs of natural gas and other fuels;

 O the ability to complete necessary or desirable pipeline expansion or infrastructure projects, limits on pipeline capacity, and operational 

interruptions to natural gas distribution and transmission activities;

 O transmission constraints;

 O effects of inflation;

 O the ability to control costs and avoid cost and schedule overruns during the development, construction, and operation of facilities, 

including Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which includes components based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in 

the global nuclear industry at this scale, including changes in labor costs, availability, and productivity; challenges with management of 

contractors, subcontractors, or vendors; adverse weather conditions; shortages, increased costs, or inconsistent quality of equipment, 

materials, and labor; contractor or supplier delay; non-performance under construction, operating, or other agreements; operational 

readiness, including specialized operator training and required site safety programs; engineering or design problems; design and other 

licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC; challenges with 

start-up activities, including major equipment failure and system integration; and/or operational performance;

 O the ability to construct facilities in accordance with the requirements of permits and licenses (including satisfaction of NRC 

requirements), to satisfy any environmental performance standards and the requirements of tax credits and other incentives, and to 

integrate facilities into the Southern Company system upon completion of construction;

 O investment performance of the employee and retiree benefit plans and nuclear decommissioning trust funds;

 O advances in technology;

 O the ability to control operating and maintenance costs;

 O ongoing renewable energy partnerships and development agreements;

 O state and federal rate regulations and the impact of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including rate actions relating to 

ROE, equity ratios, and fuel and other cost recovery mechanisms;

 O the ability to successfully operate the electric utilities’ generating, transmission, and distribution facilities and Southern Company Gas’ 

natural gas distribution and storage facilities and the successful performance of necessary corporate functions;

 O legal proceedings and regulatory approvals and actions related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, including Georgia PSC approvals and 

NRC actions;

 O under certain specified circumstances, a decision by holders of more than 10% of the ownership interests of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 

4 not to proceed with construction and the ability of other Vogtle Owners to tender a portion of their ownership interests to Georgia 

Power following certain construction cost increases;

 O in the event Georgia Power becomes obligated to provide funding to MEAG with respect to the portion of MEAG’s ownership interest in 

Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 involving JEA, any inability of Georgia Power to receive repayment of such funding;

 O the inherent risks involved in operating and constructing nuclear generating facilities;

18

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportCautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements (continued)

 O the inherent risks involved in transporting and storing natural gas;

 O the performance of projects undertaken by the non-utility businesses and the success of efforts to invest in and develop new 

opportunities;

 O internal restructuring or other restructuring options that may be pursued;

 O potential business strategies, including acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, including the proposed disposition of Plant 

Mankato, which cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to Southern Company or its subsidiaries;

 O the ability of counterparties of Southern Company and its subsidiaries to make payments as and when due and to perform as required;

 O the ability to obtain new short- and long-term contracts with wholesale customers;

 O the direct or indirect effect on the Southern Company system’s business resulting from cyber intrusion or physical attack and the threat 

of physical attacks;

 O interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts;

 O access to capital markets and other financing sources;

 O changes in Southern Company’s and any of its subsidiaries’ credit ratings;

 O the ability of Southern Company’s electric utilities to obtain additional generating capacity (or sell excess generating capacity) at 

competitive prices;

 O catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and other storms, droughts, pandemic health 

events, or other similar occurrences;

 O the direct or indirect effects on the Southern Company system’s business resulting from incidents affecting the U.S. electric grid, natural 

gas pipeline infrastructure, or operation of generating or storage resources;

 O impairments of goodwill or long-lived assets;

 O the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard-setting bodies; and

 O other factors discussed elsewhere herein and in other reports (including the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 

December 31, 2018) filed by Southern Company from time to time with the SEC.

Southern Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Available Information

Southern Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (Form 10-K), as well as other documents filed by 

Southern Company pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available electronically at http://www.sec.gov.

A copy of the Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission will be provided without charge upon 

written request to the office of the Corporate Secretary. Requests for copies should be directed to the Corporate Secretary, 

30 Ivan Allen Jr. Blvd., N.W., Atlanta, GA 30308. 

19

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportSouthern Company Business

Southern Company is a holding company that owns all of the outstanding common stock of Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and 

Mississippi Power, each of which is an operating public utility company. The traditional electric operating companies supply electric service 

in the states of Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi. The traditional electric operating companies are vertically integrated utilities that own 

generation, transmission, and distribution facilities.

On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy for an aggregate cash purchase price of 

approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), subject to customary working capital adjustments. Gulf Power is an 

electric utility serving retail customers in the northwestern portion of Florida.

Southern Company also owns all of the common stock of Southern Power Company, which is also an operating public utility company. 

Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells 

electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. 

Southern Company Gas, which was acquired by Southern Company in July 2016, is an energy services holding company whose primary 

business is the distribution of natural gas in four states – Illinois, Georgia, Virginia, and Tennessee – through the natural gas distribution 

utilities. Southern Company Gas is also involved in several other businesses that are complementary to the distribution of natural gas.

Southern Company also owns all of the outstanding common stock or membership interests of SCS, Southern Linc, Southern Holdings, 

Southern Nuclear, PowerSecure, and other direct and indirect subsidiaries. SCS, the system service company, has contracted with Southern 

Company, each traditional electric operating company, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, Southern Nuclear, SEGCO, and other 

subsidiaries to furnish, at direct or allocated cost and upon request, the following services: general executive and advisory, general and 

design engineering, operations, purchasing, accounting, finance, treasury, legal, tax, information technology, marketing, auditing, insurance 

and pension administration, human resources, systems and procedures, digital wireless communications, cellular tower space, and other 

services with respect to business and operations, construction management, and power pool transactions. Southern Linc provides digital 

wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and 

provides fiber optics services within the Southeast. Southern Holdings is an intermediate holding company subsidiary, primarily for 

Southern Company’s investments in leveraged leases and energy-related funds and companies, and for other electric and natural gas 

products and services. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to the Southern Company system’s nuclear power plants and is 

currently managing construction of and developing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which are co-owned by Georgia Power. PowerSecure is a 

provider of energy solutions, including distributed energy infrastructure, energy efficiency products and services, and utility infrastructure 

services, to customers.

20

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportSouthern Company Common Stock Information

The common stock of Southern Company is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SO”. The common stock 

is also traded on regional exchanges across the U.S. At January 31, 2019, Southern Company had 115,847 common stockholders of record.

Five Year Cumulative Performance Graph

This performance graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on Southern Company’s common stock with the Standard & 

Poor’s 500 index and the Philadelphia Utility Index for the past five years. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 

2013 in Southern Company’s common stock and each of the indices and that all dividends were reinvested. The stockholder return shown 

for the five-year historical period may not be indicative of future performance.

$180

$160

$140

$120

$100

$80

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

 Southern Company
 S&P 500
 Philadelphia Utilities Index

2013
100
100
100

2014
125
114
129

2015
125
115
121

2016
138
129
142

2017
141
157
160

2018
136
150
166

21

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of Southern Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over 

financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can 

provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

Under management’s supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of Southern Company’s internal control over financial 

reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of 

Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that Southern Company’s 

internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, as auditors of Southern Company’s financial statements, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of 

Southern Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, which is included herein.

Thomas A. Fanning 
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

Andrew W. Evans 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

February 19, 2019

22

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of The Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of capitalization of The Southern Company 

and subsidiary companies (Southern Company) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of income, 

comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and 

the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). We also have audited Southern Company’s internal control over 
financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the 
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Southern Company 

as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended 

December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, 

Southern Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based 
on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

Basis for Opinions
Southern Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial 

reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements 

and an opinion on Southern Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm 

registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect 

to Southern Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and 

Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to 

obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and 

whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the 

financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included 

examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating 

the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the 

financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over 

financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of 

internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the 

circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of 

financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting 

principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance 

of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; 

(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance 

with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance 

with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely 

detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial 

statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections 

of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in 

conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Atlanta, Georgia 

February 19, 2019

We have served as Southern Company’s auditor since 2002.

23

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

OVERVIEW

Business Activities
Southern Company is a holding company that owns all of the common stock of the traditional electric operating companies and the parent 

entities of Southern Power and Southern Company Gas and owns other direct and indirect subsidiaries. The primary businesses of the 

Southern Company system are electricity sales by the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and the distribution of 

natural gas by Southern Company Gas.

 O The traditional electric operating companies are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in three Southeastern states 

as of January 1, 2019. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy for an aggregate 

cash purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), subject to customary working capital 

adjustments. At December 31, 2018, the assets and liabilities of Gulf Power were classified as held for sale on Southern Company’s 

balance sheet. Unless otherwise noted, the disclosures herein related to specific asset and liability balances at December 31, 2018 

exclude assets and liabilities held for sale. See Note 15 under “Assets Held for Sale” for additional information. A preliminary gain of 

$2.5 billion pre-tax ($1.3 billion after tax) associated with the sale of Gulf Power is expected to be recorded in 2019.

 O Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and 

sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. On May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity 

interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power’s solar facilities, for approximately 

$1.2 billion and, on December 11, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company 

owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion. On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into 

an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an 

aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million, which is expected to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter 

cannot be determined at this time.

 O Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through its natural gas distribution utilities and is involved in several other 

complementary businesses including gas pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services. In July 2018, 

Southern Company Gas completed sales of three of its natural gas distribution utilities.

See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – “General” herein and Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding 

disposition activities.

Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Southern Company system’s electricity and natural gas businesses. 

These factors include the ability to maintain constructive regulatory environments, to maintain and grow sales and customers, and to 

effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, stringent 

environmental standards, including CCR rules, reliability, fuel, restoration following major storms, and capital expenditures, including 

constructing new electric generating plants, expanding and improving the electric transmission and distribution systems, and updating and 

expanding the natural gas distribution systems.

The traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities have various regulatory mechanisms that operate to 

address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and 

capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge the Southern Company system for the foreseeable future. See Note 2 

to the financial statements for additional information.

In 2018, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, Atlanta Gas Light, and Nicor Gas reached agreements with their respective 

state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies relating to the regulatory impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, which, for some 

companies, included capital structure adjustments expected to help mitigate the potential adverse impacts to certain of their credit 

metrics. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding state PSC or other regulatory agency actions related 

to the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – “Income Tax 

Matters” and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – “Credit Rating Risk” herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for information 

regarding the Tax Reform Legislation.

Another major factor affecting the Southern Company system’s businesses is the profitability of the competitive market-based wholesale 

generating business. Southern Power’s strategy is to create value through various transactions including acquisitions, dispositions, and 

sales of partnership interests, development and construction of new generating facilities, and entry into PPAs primarily with investor-

owned utilities, IPPs, municipalities, electric cooperatives, and other load-serving entities, as well as commercial and industrial customers. 

In general, Southern Power commits to the construction or acquisition of new generating capacity only after entering into or assuming 

long-term PPAs for the new facilities.

24

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Southern Company’s other business activities include providing energy solutions, including distributed energy infrastructure, energy 

efficiency products and services, and utility infrastructure services, to customers. Other business activities also include investments in 

telecommunications, leveraged lease projects, and gas storage facilities. Management continues to evaluate the contribution of each 

of these activities to total shareholder return and may pursue acquisitions, dispositions, and other strategic ventures or investments 

accordingly.

In striving to achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns while providing cost-effective energy to more than eight million electric and gas 

utility customers, the Southern Company system continues to focus on several key performance indicators. These indicators include, but are 

not limited to, customer satisfaction, plant availability, electric and natural gas system reliability, execution of major construction projects, 

and earnings per share (EPS). Southern Company’s financial success is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring 

customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys 

and reliability indicators to evaluate the results of the Southern Company system.

See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on Southern Company’s financial performance.

Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 Status
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (with electric generating capacity of 

approximately 1,100 MWs each). Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In March 2017, the EPC 

Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved 

Georgia Power’s recommendation to continue construction. The current expected in-service dates remain November 2021 for Unit 3 and 

November 2022 for Unit 4.

In the second quarter 2018, Georgia Power revised its base capital cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and 

start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to $8.0 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast of $8.4 billion 

(net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds), 

with respect to Georgia Power’s ownership interest. Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary 

to complete the project and the Georgia PSC’s order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant 

Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for the $0.7 billion increase in costs included 

in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report that was approved by the Georgia 

PSC on February 19, 2019. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently 

included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital 

cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in 

the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by 

management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to 

income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018.

As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power’s decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase 

in the base capital costs, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to 

continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 

4. In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) a binding term sheet (Vogtle Owner Term Sheet) 

with the other Vogtle Owners and certain of MEAG’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, including MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC (MEAG SPVJ), to take 

certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners and (ii) a term sheet (MEAG Term Sheet) 

with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ’s ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 under certain 

circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of 

the MEAG Term Sheet. On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and certain of MEAG’s wholly-owned subsidiaries 

entered into certain amendments to their joint ownership agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – “Construction Program – Nuclear Construction” herein for additional information on Plant Vogtle 

Units 3 and 4.

25

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Earnings
Consolidated net income attributable to Southern Company was $2.2 billion in 2018, an increase of $1.4 billion, or 164.4%, from the prior 

year. The increase was primarily due to charges of $3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax) in 2017 related to the Kemper IGCC at Mississippi 

Power, partially offset by a $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) charge in the second quarter 2018 for an estimated probable loss on Georgia 

Power’s construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The increase also reflects lower federal income tax expense as a result of the Tax Reform 

Legislation, partially offset by impairment charges, primarily associated with asset sales at Southern Power and Southern Company Gas.

Consolidated net income attributable to Southern Company was $842 million in 2017, a decrease of $1.6 billion, or 65.6%, from the prior 

year. The decrease was primarily due to pre-tax charges of $3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax) related to the Kemper IGCC at Mississippi 

Power. Also contributing to the change were increases of $240 million in net income from Southern Company Gas (excluding the impact 

of $111 million in additional expense related to the Tax Reform Legislation) reflecting the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the six-

month period following the Merger closing on July 1, 2016, $264 million related to net tax benefits from the Tax Reform Legislation, higher 

retail electric revenues resulting from increases in base rates partially offset by milder weather and lower customer usage, and increases in 

renewable energy sales at Southern Power. These increases were partially offset by higher interest and depreciation and amortization.

See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas” for additional information 

regarding the Merger.

Basic EPS was $2.18 in 2018, $0.84 in 2017, and $2.57 in 2016. Diluted EPS, which factors in additional shares related to stock-based 

compensation, was $2.17 in 2018, $0.84 in 2017, and $2.55 in 2016. EPS for 2018, 2017, and 2016 was negatively impacted by $0.04, 

$0.04, and $0.12 per share, respectively, as a result of increases in the average shares outstanding. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND 

LIQUIDITY – “Financing Activities” herein for additional information.

Dividends
Southern Company has paid dividends on its common stock since 1948. Dividends paid per share of common stock were $2.38 in 2018, 

$2.30 in 2017, and $2.22 in 2016. In January 2019, Southern Company declared a quarterly dividend of 60 cents per share. This is the 

285th consecutive quarter that Southern Company has paid a dividend equal to or higher than the previous quarter. For 2018, the 

dividend payout ratio was 109% compared to 273% for 2017. The decrease was due to an increase in earnings in 2018 resulting from 

charges related to the Kemper IGCC in 2017, partially offset by the charge related to construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in 2018. 

See “Earnings” and RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – “Electricity Business – Estimated Loss on Projects Under Construction” herein and Note 2 

to the financial statements under “Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction” and “Mississippi Power – Kemper County Energy Facility” for 

additional information.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Discussion of the results of operations is divided into three parts – the Southern Company system’s primary business of electricity sales, its 

gas business, and its other business activities.

Electricity business
Gas business
Other business activities
Net Income

2018

$2,304
372
(450)
$2,226

2017
(in millions)

$ 878
243
(279)
$ 842

2016

$2,571
114
(237)
$2,448

Electricity Business
Southern Company’s electric utilities generate and sell electricity to retail and wholesale customers. The results of operations discussed 

below include the results of Gulf Power through December 31, 2018. See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Company’s 

Sale of Gulf Power” for additional information.

26

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

A condensed statement of income for the electricity business follows:

Electric operating revenues
Fuel
Purchased power
Cost of other sales
Other operations and maintenance
Depreciation and amortization
Taxes other than income taxes
Estimated loss on plants under construction
Impairment charges
Gain on dispositions, net
Total electric operating expenses
Operating income
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
Other income (expense), net
Income taxes
Net income
Less:

Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net Income Attributable to Southern Company

Amount
2018

$18,571
4,637
971
66
4,635
2,565
1,098
1,097
156
—
15,225
3,346
131
1,035
144
207
2,379

16
59
$ 2,304

Increase (Decrease) 
from Prior Year

2018
(in millions)
31
$
237
108
(3)
45
108
35
(2,265)
156
40
(1,539)
1,570
(21)
24
17
125
1,417

(22)
13
$ 1,426

2017

$ 599
39
113
11
(76)
224
24
2,934
—
(41)
3,228
(2,629)
(48)
80
58
(1,009)
(1,690)

(7)
10
$(1,693)

Electric Operating Revenues
Electric operating revenues for 2018 were $18.6 billion, reflecting a $31 million increase from 2017. Details of electric operating revenues 

were as follows:

Retail electric — prior year
Estimated change resulting from —

Rates and pricing
Sales growth (decline)
Weather
Fuel and other cost recovery
Retail electric — current year
Wholesale electric revenues
Other electric revenues
Other revenues
Electric operating revenues
Percent change

2018

2017

(in millions)

$15,330

$15,234

(773)
84
300
281
15,222
2,516
664
169
$18,571

508
(71)
(281)
(60)
15,330
2,426
681
103
$18,540

0.2%

3.3%

Retail electric revenues decreased $108 million, or 0.7%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The significant factors driving this change 

are shown in the preceding table. The decrease in rates and pricing in 2018 was primarily due to revenues deferred as regulatory liabilities 

for customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation and expected customer refunds at Alabama Power and Georgia Power.

Retail electric revenues increased $96 million, or 0.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The significant factors driving this change 

are shown in the preceding table. The increase in rates and pricing in 2017 was primarily due to a Rate RSE increase at Alabama Power 

effective in January 2017, the recovery of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction financing costs under the NCCR tariff at Georgia Power, 

and an increase in retail base rates effective July 2017 at Gulf Power.

See Note 2 to the financial statements under “Southern Company – Gulf Power,” “Alabama Power – Rate RSE” and “ – Rate CNP 

Compliance,” “Georgia Power – Rate Plans,” and “ – Nuclear Construction” for additional information. Also see “Energy Sales” below for a 
discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales growth (decline) and weather.

27

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Electric rates for the traditional electric operating companies include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, including the 

energy component of purchased power costs. Under these provisions, fuel revenues generally equal fuel expenses, including the energy 

component of PPA costs, and do not affect net income. The traditional electric operating companies each have one or more regulatory 

mechanisms to recover other costs such as environmental and other compliance costs, storm damage, new plants, and PPA capacity costs.

Wholesale electric revenues consist of PPAs and short-term opportunity sales. Wholesale electric revenues from PPAs (other than solar and 

wind PPAs) have both capacity and energy components. Capacity revenues generally represent the greatest contribution to net income and 

are designed to provide recovery of fixed costs plus a return on investment. Energy revenues will vary depending on fuel prices, the market 

prices of wholesale energy compared to the Southern Company system’s generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company 

system’s electric service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system’s generation. Increases and decreases in energy 

revenues that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and do not have a significant impact on 

net income. Energy sales from solar and wind PPAs do not have a capacity charge and customers either purchase the energy output of 

a dedicated renewable facility through an energy charge or through a fixed price related to the energy. As a result, the ability to recover 

fixed and variable operations and maintenance expenses is dependent upon the level of energy generated from these facilities, which can 

be impacted by weather conditions, equipment performance, transmission constraints, and other factors. Wholesale electric revenues at 

Mississippi Power include FERC-regulated MRA sales as well as market-based sales. Short-term opportunity sales are made at market-based 

rates that generally provide a margin above the Southern Company system’s variable cost to produce the energy.

Wholesale electric revenues from power sales were as follows:

Capacity and other
Energy
Total

2018

$ 620
1,896
$2,516

2017
(in millions)

$ 642
1,784
$2,426

2016

$ 570
1,356
$1,926

In 2018, wholesale revenues increased $90 million, or 3.7%, as compared to the prior year due to a $112 million increase in energy 

revenues, partially offset by a $22 million decrease in capacity revenues. The increase in energy revenues was primarily related to Southern 

Power and includes new PPAs related to existing natural gas facilities, new renewable facilities, and an increase in the volume of KWHs sold 

at existing renewable facilities, partially offset by a decrease in non-PPA revenues from short-term sales. The decrease in capacity revenues 

was primarily due to the expiration of a wholesale contract in the fourth quarter 2017 at Georgia Power.

In 2017, wholesale revenues increased $500 million, or 26.0%, as compared to the prior year due to a $428 million increase in energy 

revenues and a $72 million increase in capacity revenues, primarily at Southern Power. The increase in energy revenues was primarily due 

to increases in renewable energy sales arising from new solar and wind facilities and non-PPA revenues from short-term sales. The increase 

in capacity revenues was primarily due to a PPA related to new natural gas facilities and additional customer capacity requirements.

Other Electric Revenues

Other electric revenues decreased $17 million, or 2.5%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The decrease is primarily related to a 

decrease in open access transmission tariff revenues, largely due to a lower rate related to the Tax Reform Legislation. Other electric 

revenues decreased $17 million, or 2.4%, in 2017, as compared to the prior year. The decrease reflects a $15 million decrease in open access 

transmission tariff revenues, primarily as a result of the expiration of long-term transmission services contracts at Georgia Power.

Energy Sales

Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the change in the volume of energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 2018 and the 

percent change from the prior year were as follows:

Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other
Total retail
Wholesale
Total energy sales

28

Total 
KWHs
2018
(in billions)
54.6
53.5
53.3
0.8
162.2
49.9
212.1

Total KWH 
Percent Change

Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change

2018

2017

2018

2017

8.0%
2.1
1.1
(5.5)
3.6
1.9
3.2%

(5.3)%
(2.6)
—
(4.0)
(2.6)
32.4

3.9%

1.2%
0.5
1.1
(5.7)
0.9%

(0.3)%
(0.9)
—
(3.9)
(0.4)%

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and changes in the 

number of customers. Retail energy sales increased 5.7 billion KWHs in 2018 as compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily due 

to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding 

periods in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales increased primarily due to customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH 

sales increased primarily due to customer growth, partially offset by decreased customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in 

energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model. Industrial KWH energy sales increased primarily due 

to increased sales in the primary metals sector, partially offset by decreased sales in the paper sector.

Retail energy sales decreased 4.2 billion KWHs in 2017 as compared to the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to milder weather 

and decreased customer usage, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales decreased primarily due to 

decreased customer usage resulting from an increase in penetration of energy-efficient residential appliances and an increase in multi-

family housing, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales decreased primarily due to decreased 

customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model, 

partially offset by customer growth. Industrial KWH energy sales were flat primarily due to decreased sales in the paper, stone, clay, and 

glass, transportation, and chemicals sectors, offset by increased sales in the primary metals and textile sectors. Additionally, Hurricane Irma 

negatively impacted customer usage for all customer classes.

See “Electric Operating Revenues” above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale revenues related to changes in price and 

KWH sales.

Other Revenues

Other revenues increased $66 million, or 64.1%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to unregulated sales 

of products and services that were reclassified from other income (expense), net as a result of the adoption of ASC 606, Revenue from 

Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the adoption of ASC 606.

Other revenues increased $20 million in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to additional third party 

infrastructure services.

Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
The mix of fuel sources for the generation of electricity is determined primarily by demand, the unit cost of fuel consumed, and the 

availability of generating units. Additionally, the electric utilities purchase a portion of their electricity needs from the wholesale market.

Details of the Southern Company system’s generation and purchased power were as follows:

Total generation (in billions of KWHs)
Total purchased power (in billions of KWHs)
Sources of generation (percent) —

Gas
Coal
Nuclear
Hydro
Other

Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)(a) —

Gas
Coal
Nuclear

Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)(a)
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(b)

2018
200
21

46
30
15
3
6

2.89
2.80
0.80
2.50
5.46

2017
194
20

46
30
16
2
6

2.79
2.81
0.79
2.44
5.19

2016
188
19

46
33
16
2
3

2.48
3.04
0.81
2.40
4.81

(a)  For 2018, cost of fuel, generated and average cost of fuel, generated excludes a $30 million adjustment associated with a May 2018 Alabama PSC 

accounting order related to excess deferred income taxes.

(b)  Average cost of purchased power includes fuel purchased by the Southern Company system for tolling agreements where power is generated by the provider.

In 2018, total fuel and purchased power expenses were $5.6 billion, an increase of $345 million, or 6.6%, as compared to the prior year. 

The increase was primarily the result of a $178 million increase in the volume of KWHs generated and purchased primarily due to colder 

weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 

2017 and a $137 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily due to higher natural gas prices.

29

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

In addition, fuel expense increased $30 million in 2018 as a result of an Alabama PSC accounting order authorizing the amortization of 

a regulatory liability to offset under recovered fuel costs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – “Regulatory Matters – Alabama Power – 

Tax Reform Accounting Order” herein for additional information.

In 2017, total fuel and purchased power expenses were $5.3 billion, an increase of $152 million, or 3.0%, as compared to the prior year. The 

increase was primarily the result of a $196 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily due to higher natural 

gas prices, partially offset by a $44 million net decrease in the volume of KWHs generated and purchased.

Fuel and purchased power energy transactions at the traditional electric operating companies are generally offset by fuel revenues and do 

not have a significant impact on net income. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – “Regulatory Matters – Fuel Cost Recovery” herein for 

additional information. Fuel expenses incurred under Southern Power’s PPAs are generally the responsibility of the counterparties and do 

not significantly impact net income.

Fuel
In 2018, fuel expense was $4.6 billion, an increase of $237 million, or 5.4%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due 
to a 3.6% increase in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated, a 3.5% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by coal, and a 

2.8% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas.

In 2017, fuel expense was $4.4 billion, an increase of $39 million, or 0.9%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to 

a 12.5% increase in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated and a 2.8% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by natural 

gas, partially offset by a 7.9% decrease in the volume of KWHs generated by coal and a 7.6% decrease in the average cost of coal per 

KWH generated.

Purchased Power

In 2018, purchased power expense was $971 million, an increase of $108 million, or 12.5%, as compared to the prior year. The increase 

was primarily due to a 5.2% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased, primarily as a result of higher natural gas prices, and a 5.2% 

increase in the volume of KWHs purchased.

In 2017, purchased power expense was $863 million, an increase of $113 million, or 15.1%, as compared to the prior year. The increase 

was primarily due to a 7.9% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased, primarily as a result of higher natural gas prices, and a 5.0% 

increase in the volume of KWHs purchased.

Energy purchases will vary depending on demand for energy within the Southern Company system’s electric service territory, the market 

prices of wholesale energy as compared to the cost of the Southern Company system’s generation, and the availability of the Southern 

Company system’s generation.

Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses increased $45 million, or 1.0%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was 

primarily due to a $74 million increase in transmission and distribution costs, primarily related to additional vegetation management at 

Georgia Power, and $74 million in expenses from unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified to other operations 
and maintenance expenses as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. In prior periods, these expenses were included in other income 

(expense), net. These increases were partially offset by a $32.5 million charge in the first quarter 2017 related to the write-down of Gulf 

Power’s ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 in accordance with a rate case settlement agreement, a $30 million net decrease in employee 

compensation and benefits, including pension costs, largely due to a decrease in active medical costs at Alabama Power and a 2017 

employee attrition plan at Georgia Power, and a $27 million decrease in customer accounts, service, and sales costs primarily due to cost-

saving initiatives. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the adoption of ASC 606.

Other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $76 million, or 1.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The decrease 

was primarily due to cost containment and modernization activities implemented at Georgia Power that contributed to decreases of 

$85 million in generation maintenance costs, $46 million in transmission and distribution overhead line maintenance, $22 million in other 

employee compensation and benefits, and $22 million in customer accounts, service, and sales costs. Additionally, there was a $34 million 

decrease in scheduled outage and maintenance costs at generation facilities. These decreases were partially offset by a $56 million increase 

associated with new facilities at Southern Power, a $37 million increase in transmission and distribution costs primarily due to vegetation 

management at Alabama Power, and $32.5 million resulting from the write-down of Gulf Power’s ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 in 

accordance with a rate case settlement agreement.

Production expenses and transmission and distribution expenses fluctuate from year to year due to variations in outage and maintenance 

schedules and normal changes in the cost of labor and materials.

30

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $108 million, or 4.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related 

to additional plant in service. Additionally, the increase reflects $34 million in depreciation credits recognized in 2017, as authorized in Gulf 

Power’s 2013 rate case settlement.

Depreciation and amortization increased $224 million, or 10.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase reflects $203 million 

related to additional plant in service at the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and a $13 million increase in 

amortization related to environmental compliance at Mississippi Power. The increase was partially offset by $34 million in depreciation 

credits recognized in accordance with Gulf Power’s 2013 rate case settlement.

See Note 2 to the financial statements under “Southern Company – Regulatory Assets and Liabilities” and Note 5 to the financial 

statements under “Depreciation and Amortization” for additional information.

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $35 million, or 3.3%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to increased property 

taxes associated with higher assessed values and an increase in municipal franchise fees primarily related to higher retail revenues at 

Georgia Power.

Taxes other than income taxes increased $24 million, or 2.3%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in 

property taxes due to new facilities at Southern Power.

Estimated Loss on Projects Under Construction
In the second quarter 2018, an estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion was recorded to reflect Georgia Power’s revised estimate to complete 

construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which reflects the increase in costs included in the revised base capital cost 

forecast for which Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery and costs included in the revised construction contingency estimate for which 

Georgia Power may seek rate recovery as and when such costs are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. See Note 2 to 

the financial statements under “Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction” for additional information.

Charges associated with the Kemper IGCC of $37 million, $3.4 billion, and $428 million were recorded in 2018, 2017, and 2016, 

respectively. The 2018 pre-tax charge of $37 million primarily resulted from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing 

period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility. On June 28, 2017, 

Mississippi Power suspended the gasifier portion of the project and recorded a charge to earnings for the remaining $2.8 billion book 

value of the gasifier portion of the project. Prior to the suspension, Mississippi Power recorded losses for revisions of estimated costs 

expected to be incurred on construction of the Kemper IGCC in excess of the $2.88 billion cost cap established by the Mississippi PSC, 

net of $245 million of grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2 and excluding the cost of 
the lignite mine and equipment, the cost of the CO2 pipeline facilities, AFUDC, and certain general exceptions. See Note 2 to the financial 
statements under “Mississippi Power – Kemper County Energy Facility” for additional information.

Impairment Charges
In the second quarter 2018, Southern Power recorded a $119 million asset impairment charge in contemplation of the sale of Plant Oleander 

and Plant Stanton Unit A (together, the Florida Plants) and in the third quarter 2018 recorded a $36 million asset impairment charge on wind 

turbine equipment held for development projects. There were no asset impairment charges recorded in 2017 or 2016. See Note 15 to the 

financial statements under “Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants” and “ – Development Projects” for additional information.

Gain on Dispositions, Net
Gain on dispositions, net decreased $40 million in 2018 and increased $41 million in 2017 as compared to the prior periods primarily due 

to gains on sales of assets at Georgia Power recorded in 2017.

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
AFUDC equity decreased $21 million, or 13.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to Mississippi Power’s suspension 

of the Kemper IGCC construction in June 2017, partially offset by a higher AFUDC rate resulting from a higher equity ratio and 

lower short-term borrowings at Georgia Power and a higher AFUDC base related to steam and transmission construction projects at 

Alabama Power.

AFUDC equity decreased $48 million, or 24.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to Mississippi Power’s suspension of 

the Kemper IGCC in June 2017.

See Note 2 to the financial statements under “Mississippi Power – Kemper County Energy Facility” for additional information.

31

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $24 million, or 2.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was 

primarily related to Mississippi Power and reflects a $33 million net reduction in interest recorded in 2017 following a settlement with 

the IRS related to research and experimental deductions and a $29 million reduction in interest capitalized related to the Kemper IGCC 

suspension in June 2017. The increase also reflects an increase in outstanding borrowings and higher interest rates at Alabama Power, 

partially offset by a decrease in outstanding borrowings at Georgia Power. See Note 10 to the financial statements under “Section 174 

Research and Experimental Deduction” for additional information.

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $80 million, or 8.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an 

increase in average outstanding long-term debt, primarily at Southern Power and Georgia Power, and a $37 million decrease in interest 

capitalized, primarily at Southern Power and Mississippi Power, partially offset by a net reduction of $33 million following Mississippi 

Power’s settlement with the IRS related to research and experimental deductions. See Note 10 to the financial statements under 

“Unrecognized Tax Benefits” for additional information.

See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.

Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net increased $17 million, or 13.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to the settlement of 

Mississippi Power’s Deepwater Horizon claim in May 2018 and a gain from a joint-development wind project at Southern Power, which 

is attributable to Southern Power’s partner in the project and fully offset within noncontrolling interests, partially offset by an increase 
in charitable donations. See Note 3 to the financial statements under “General Litigation Matters – Mississippi Power” and Note 7 to the 
financial statements under “Southern Power” for additional information.

Other income (expense), net increased $58 million, or 84.1%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to a decrease in 

non-service cost components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits costs, partially offset by increases in charitable 

donations. The change also includes an increase of $159 million in currency losses arising from a translation of euro-denominated fixed-rate 

notes into U.S. dollars, fully offset by an equal change in gains on the foreign currency hedges that were reclassified from accumulated OCI 

into earnings at Southern Power. See Note 1 under “Recently Adopted Accounting Standards” and Note 11 to the financial statements for 

additional information on net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs.

Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $125 million, or 152.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in 

pre-tax earnings, primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2017 related to the Kemper IGCC at Mississippi Power, partially offset by the 

estimated probable loss on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at Georgia Power recognized in the second quarter 2018. This increase was partially 

offset by lower federal income tax expense, as well as benefits from the flowback of excess deferred income taxes as a result of the Tax 

Reform Legislation.

Income taxes decreased $1.0 billion, or 92.5%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to $809 million in tax benefits related 

to estimated losses on the Kemper IGCC at Mississippi Power and $346 million in net tax benefits resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation.

See Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.

Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock of Subsidiaries
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries decreased $22 million, or 57.9%, in 2018 as compared to 2017 and decreased 

$7 million, or 15.6%, in 2017 as compared to 2016. These decreases were primarily due to the 2017 redemptions of all outstanding shares 

of preferred and preference stock at Georgia Power and Gulf Power. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Substantially all noncontrolling interests relate to renewable projects at Southern Power. Net income attributable to noncontrolling 

interests increased $13 million, or 28.3%, in 2018, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to $20 million of net 

income allocations due to the sale of a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar in 2018 and $14 million of other income allocations 

attributable to a joint-development wind project, partially offset by a reduction of $19 million due to HLBV income allocations between 

Southern Power and tax equity partners for partnerships entered into during 2018. In 2017, noncontrolling interests increased $10 million, 

or 28%, compared to 2016 primarily due to additional net income allocations from new solar partnerships.

See Note 15 under “Southern Power” for additional information.

32

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Gas Business
Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through utilities in four states and is involved in several other complementary businesses 

including gas pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services.

A condensed statement of income for the gas business follows:

Operating revenues
Cost of natural gas
Cost of other sales
Other operations and maintenance
Depreciation and amortization
Taxes other than income taxes
Impairment charges
Gain on dispositions, net
Total operating expenses
Operating income
Earnings from equity method investments
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
Other income (expense), net
Income taxes
Net income

Amount
2018

$3,909
1,539
12
981
500
211
42
(291)
2,994
915
148
228
1
464
$ 372

Increase (Decrease) 
from Prior Year

2018
(in millions)
$ (11)
(62)
(17)
36
(1)
27
42
(291)
(266)
255
42
28
(43)
97
$ 129

2017

$2,268
988
19
424
263
113
—
—
1,807
461
46
119
32
291
$ 129

In the table above, the 2018 changes for Southern Company Gas reflect the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017. The 

Southern Company Gas Dispositions were completed by July 29, 2018 and represent the primary variance driver for the 2018 changes. 

Additional detailed variance explanations are provided herein. The 2017 changes reflect the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the 

six-month period following the Merger closing on July 1, 2016, which is the primary variance driver. Additionally, earnings from equity 

method investments include Southern Company Gas’ acquisition of a 50% equity interest in SNG completed in September 2016. See Note 

15 to the financial statements under “Southern Company Gas” for additional information on Southern Company Gas’ investment in SNG 

and the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.

Seasonality of Results
During the period from November through March when natural gas usage and operating revenues are generally higher (Heating Season), 

more customers are connected to Southern Company Gas’ distribution systems, and natural gas usage is higher in periods of colder 

weather. Occasionally in the summer, operating revenues are impacted due to peak usage by power generators in response to summer 

energy demands. Southern Company Gas’ base operating expenses, excluding cost of natural gas, bad debt expense, and certain incentive 
compensation costs, are incurred relatively equally over any given year. Thus, operating results can vary significantly from quarter to 

quarter as a result of seasonality. For 2018, the percentage of operating revenues and net income generated during the Heating Season 

(January through March and November through December) were 68.7% and 96.0%, respectively. For 2017, the percentage of operating 

revenues and net income generated during the Heating Season were 67.3% and 73.7%, respectively. The 2017 net income generated during 

the Heating Season was significantly impacted by additional tax expense recorded in the fourth quarter resulting from the Tax Reform 

Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – “Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation” herein for additional information.

33

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Operating Revenues
Operating revenues in 2018 were $3.9 billion, reflecting an $11 million decrease from 2017. Details of operating revenues were as follows:

Operating revenues – prior year

Estimated change resulting from –

Infrastructure replacement programs and base rate changes
Gas costs and other cost recovery
Weather
Wholesale gas services
Southern Company Gas Dispositions(*)
Other

Operating revenues – current year

(in millions)

$3,920

(% change)

31
3
13
138
(228)
32
$3,909

0.8
0.1
0.3
3.5
(5.8)
0.8
(0.3)%

(*)  Includes a $154 million decrease related to natural gas revenues, including alternative revenue programs, and a $74 million decrease related to other 

revenues. See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

Revenues from infrastructure replacement programs and base rate changes increased in 2018 primarily due to a $48 million increase at 

Nicor Gas, partially offset by a $12 million decrease at Atlanta Gas Light. These amounts include the natural gas distribution utilities’ 

continued investments recovered through infrastructure replacement programs and base rate increases less revenue reductions for the 

impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. See Note 2 to the financial statements under “Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

Revenues increased due to colder weather, as determined by Heating Degree Days, in 2018 compared to 2017.

Revenues from wholesale gas services increased in 2018 primarily due to increased commercial activity, partially offset by derivative losses.

Other revenues increased in 2018 primarily due to a $15 million increase from the Dalton Pipeline being placed in service in August 2017 

and a $14 million increase in Nicor Gas’ revenue taxes.

Natural gas distribution rates include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in natural gas costs. Therefore, gas costs recovered 

through natural gas revenues generally equal the amount expensed in cost of natural gas and do not affect net income from the natural 

gas distribution utilities.

Cost of Natural Gas
Excluding Atlanta Gas Light, which does not sell natural gas to end-use customers, the natural gas distribution utilities charge their utility 

customers for natural gas consumed using natural gas cost recovery mechanisms set by the applicable state regulatory agencies. Under 

these mechanisms, all prudently-incurred natural gas costs are passed through to customers without markup, subject to regulatory review. 

The natural gas distribution utilities defer or accrue the difference between the actual cost of natural gas and the amount of commodity 

revenue earned in a given period. The deferred or accrued amount is either billed or refunded to customers prospectively through 

adjustments to the commodity rate. Deferred natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory assets and accrued natural gas costs are reflected 

as regulatory liabilities. Therefore, gas costs recovered through natural gas revenues generally equal the amount expensed in cost of natural 

gas and do not affect net income from the natural gas distribution utilities. Cost of natural gas at the natural gas distribution utilities 

represented 83.2% of the total cost of natural gas for 2018.

Gas marketing services customers are charged for actual and estimated natural gas consumed. Cost of natural gas includes the cost of 

fuel and associated transportation costs, lost and unaccounted for gas, adjustments to reduce the value of inventories to market value, if 

applicable, and gains and losses associated with certain derivatives.

Cost of natural gas in 2018 was $1.5 billion, a decrease of $62 million, or 3.9%, compared to 2017, which was substantially all as a result 

of the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.

Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales in 2018 was $12 million, a decrease of $17 million, or 58.6%, compared to 2017 primarily related to the disposition of 

Pivotal Home Solutions.

Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses increased $36 million, or 3.8%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $39 million 

decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $75 million. This 

increase was primarily due to a $53 million increase in compensation and benefit costs, including a $12 million one-time increase for the 
adoption of a new paid time off policy to align with the Southern Company system, a $28 million increase in disposition-related costs, and 

34

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

an $11 million expense for a litigation settlement to facilitate the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. These increases were partially offset by 

a $27 million decrease in bad debt expense primarily at Nicor Gas, which was offset by a decrease in revenues as a result of the related 

regulatory recovery mechanism. See Note 3 to the financial statements under “General Litigation Matters – Southern Company Gas” for 

additional information on the litigation settlement.

Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization decreased $1 million, or 0.2%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $37 million decrease related 

to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, depreciation and amortization increased $36 million. The increase was primarily due to 

continued infrastructure investments at the natural gas distribution utilities, partially offset by lower amortization of intangible assets as a 

result of fair value adjustments in acquisition accounting at gas marketing services. See Note 2 to the financial statements under “Southern 

Company Gas” for additional information on infrastructure replacement programs.

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $27 million, or 14.7%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $4 million decrease 

related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, taxes other than income taxes increased $31 million. This increase primarily reflects a 

$13 million increase in revenue tax expenses as a result of higher natural gas revenues, a $12 million increase in Nicor Gas’ invested capital 

tax that reflects a $7 million credit in 2017 to establish a related regulatory asset, and a $4 million increase in property taxes. See Note 15 

to the financial statements under “Southern Company Gas” for additional information on the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.

Impairment Charges
A goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded in 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. See Notes 1 and 

15 to the financial statements under “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities” and “Southern Company Gas – Sale of Pivotal 

Home Solutions,” respectively, for additional information.

Gain on Dispositions, Net
Gain on dispositions, net was $291 million in 2018 and was associated with the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. The income tax 

expense on these gains included income tax expense on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had 

not been recorded previously.

Earnings from Equity Method Investments
Earnings from equity method investments increased $42 million, or 39.6%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily 

due to higher earnings from Southern Company Gas’ equity method investment in SNG from new rates effective September 2018 and 

lower operations and maintenance expenses due to the timing of pipeline maintenance. See Note 7 to the financial statements under 

“Southern Company Gas – Equity Method Investments” for additional information.

Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $28 million, or 14.0%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was 

primarily due to $21 million of additional interest expense related to new debt issuances and a $4 million reduction in capitalized interest 

primarily due to the Dalton Pipeline being placed in service in August 2017.

Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net decreased $43 million, or 97.7%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $3 million decrease related 

to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, other income (expense), net decreased $40 million. This decrease was primarily due to a 

$23 million increase in charitable donations and a $13 million decrease in gains from the settlement of contractor litigation claims. See 
Note 2 to the financial statements under “Southern Company Gas – Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects – PRP” for 
additional information on the contractor litigation settlement.

Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $97 million, or 26.4%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $329 million increase related to the 

Southern Company Gas Dispositions, including tax expense on the goodwill for which a deferred tax liability had not been previously 

provided, income taxes decreased $232 million. This decrease was primarily due to a lower federal income tax rate and the flowback of 

excess deferred taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, 2017 included additional tax expense of $130 million from the 

revaluation of deferred tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation, the enactment of the State of Illinois income tax legislation, 

and new income tax apportionment factors in several states. See Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.

35

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Other Business Activities
Southern Company’s other business activities primarily include the parent company (which does not allocate operating expenses 
to business units); PowerSecure, which was acquired on May 9, 2016 and is a provider of energy solutions, including distributed 
infrastructure, energy efficiency products and services, and utility infrastructure services, to customers; Southern Company Holdings, Inc. 
(Southern Holdings), which invests in various projects, including leveraged lease projects; and Southern Linc, which provides digital wireless 
communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides 
fiber optics services within the Southeast.

A condensed statement of income for Southern Company’s other business activities follows:

Operating revenues
Cost of other sales
Other operations and maintenance
Depreciation and amortization
Taxes other than income taxes
Impairment charges
Total operating expenses
Operating income (loss)
Interest expense
Other income (expense), net
Income taxes (benefit)
Net income (loss)

Amount
2018

$1,015
728
273
66
6
12
1,085
(70)
579
(23)
(222)
$ (450)

Increase (Decrease) 
from Prior Year

2018

(in millions)
$ 444
313
69
14
3
12
411
33
96
(23)
85
$(171)

2017

$268
223
9
21
—
—
253
15
178
30
(91)
$ (42)

In the table above, the 2018 changes for these other business activities reflect the inclusion of PowerSecure for the year ended December 31, 
2018 compared to 2017. The 2017 changes reflect the inclusion of PowerSecure for the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the eight-
month period following the acquisition on May 9, 2016, which is the primary variance driver. Additional detailed variance explanations are 
provided herein. See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Company Acquisition of PowerSecure” for additional information.

Operating Revenues
Southern Company’s operating revenues for these other business activities increased $444 million, or 77.8%, in 2018 as compared to the 
prior year. The increase was primarily related to PowerSecure’s storm restoration services in Puerto Rico.

Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales for these other business activities increased $313 million, or 75.4% in 2018. The increase was primarily related to 
PowerSecure’s storm restoration services in Puerto Rico.

Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses for these other business activities increased $69 million, or 33.8%, in 2018 as compared to the 
prior year. The increase was primarily due to PowerSecure’s storm restoration services in Puerto Rico and parent company expenses related 
to the sale of Gulf Power. Other operations and maintenance expenses for these other business activities increased $9 million, or 4.6%, in 
2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $44 million increase as a result of the inclusion of PowerSecure 
results for the 12-month period in 2017 compared to eight months in 2016, partially offset by a $35 million decrease in parent company 
expenses related to the Merger and the acquisition of PowerSecure.

Impairment Charges
Impairment charges for these other business activities were $12 million in 2018. These charges were associated with Southern Linc’s tower 
leases and were recorded in contemplation of the sale of Gulf Power.

Interest Expense
Interest expense for these other business activities increased $96 million, or 19.9%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due 
to an increase in variable interest rates and average outstanding debt at the parent company. Interest expense for these other business 
activities increased $178 million, or 58.4%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in average outstanding long-
term debt at the parent company. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.

36

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net for these other business activities decreased $23 million in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily 

due to charitable donations, partially offset by leveraged lease income at Southern Holdings. See Note 1 to the financial statements for 

additional information. Other income (expense), net for these other business activities increased $30 million in 2017 as compared to the 

prior year primarily due to expenses associated with bridge financing for the Merger in 2016.

Income Taxes (Benefit)
The income tax benefit for these other business activities decreased $85 million, or 27.7%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily 

as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, partially offset by an increase in pre-tax losses at the parent company. The income tax benefit 

for these other business activities increased $91 million, or 42.1%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of pre-tax 

earnings (losses) and net tax benefits related to the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – “Income Tax Matters – 

Federal Tax Reform Legislation” herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.

Effects of Inflation
The electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities are subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery 

of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that 

have less purchasing power. Southern Power is party to long-term contracts reflecting market-based rates, including inflation expectations. 

Any adverse effect of inflation on Southern Company’s results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.

FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL

General
The traditional electric operating companies operate as vertically integrated utilities providing electric service to customers within their 

service territories in the Southeast. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power, one of the traditional 

electric operating companies, to NextEra Energy. The natural gas distribution utilities provide service to customers in their service territories 

in Illinois, Georgia, Virginia, and Tennessee. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas completed sales of three of its natural gas distribution 

utilities. Prices for electricity provided and natural gas distributed to retail customers are set by state PSCs or other applicable state 

regulatory agencies under cost-based regulatory principles. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within 

certain limitations. Prices for wholesale electricity sales and natural gas distribution, interconnecting transmission lines, and the exchange 

of electric power are regulated by the FERC. Southern Power continues to focus on long-term PPAs. In 2018, Southern Power completed 

sales of noncontrolling interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of its wind facilities and also 

completed sales and entered into an agreement to sell certain of its natural gas plants. See ACCOUNTING POLICIES – “Application of Critical 

Accounting Policies and Estimates – Utility Regulation” herein and Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information about 

regulatory matters.

The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of Southern Company’s future earnings potential. Future 

earnings will be impacted by the 2018 disposition activities described herein and in Note 15 to the financial statements. The level of 

Southern Company’s future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Southern 

Company system’s primary businesses of selling electricity and distributing natural gas. These factors include the traditional electric 

operating companies’ and the natural gas distribution utilities’ ability to maintain constructive regulatory environments that allow for the 

timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs during a time of increasing costs, continued customer growth, and, for the traditional electric 

operating companies, the weak pace of growth in electricity use per customer, especially in residential and commercial markets. Plant 

Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction and rate recovery and the profitability of Southern Power’s competitive wholesale business are also 

major factors.

Earnings in the electricity business will also depend upon maintaining and growing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption 

and/or penetration rates of increasingly energy-efficient technologies, increasing volumes of electronic commerce transactions, and more 

multi-family home construction, all of which could contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings for both the electricity and 

natural gas businesses are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, new energy contracts with 

other utilities and other wholesale customers, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by 

customers, the prices of electricity and natural gas, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in the service 

territory. In addition, the level of future earnings for the wholesale electric business also depends on numerous factors including regulatory 

matters, creditworthiness of customers, total electric generating capacity available and related costs, the development or acquisition 

of renewable facilities and other energy projects, and the successful remarketing of capacity as current contracts expire. Demand for 

electricity and natural gas is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global 
economic conditions, which may impact future earnings. In addition, the volatility of natural gas prices has a significant impact on the 

37

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

natural gas distribution utilities’ customer rates, long-term competitive position against other energy sources, and the ability of Southern 

Company Gas’ gas marketing services and wholesale gas services businesses to capture value from locational and seasonal spreads. 

Additionally, changes in commodity prices subject a significant portion of Southern Company Gas’ operations to earnings variability.

As part of its ongoing effort to adapt to changing market conditions, Southern Company continues to evaluate and consider a wide array 

of potential business strategies. These strategies may include business combinations, partnerships, and acquisitions involving other utility 

or non-utility businesses or properties, disposition of certain assets or businesses, internal restructuring, or some combination thereof. 

Furthermore, Southern Company may engage in new business ventures that arise from competitive and regulatory changes in the utility 

industry. Pursuit of any of the above strategies, or any combination thereof, may significantly affect the business operations, risks, and 

financial condition of Southern Company.

On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy for an aggregate cash purchase price of 

approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), subject to customary working capital adjustments. In 2018, net 

income attributable to Gulf Power was $160 million.

On June 4, 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the stock sale of Pivotal Home Solutions to American Water Enterprises LLC for a total 

cash purchase price of $365 million. On July 1, 2018, a Southern Company Gas subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, completed the sales 

of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. for a total 

cash purchase price of $1.7 billion. On July 29, 2018, Southern Company Gas and its wholly-owned direct subsidiary, NUI Corporation, 

completed the stock sale of Pivotal Utility Holdings, which primarily consisted of Florida City Gas, to NextEra Energy for a total cash 

purchase price of $587 million. The total cash purchase price for each transaction includes final working capital and other adjustments.

The Southern Company Gas Dispositions resulted in a net loss of $51 million, which includes $342 million of tax expense. The after-

tax impacts of these dispositions included income tax expense on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred 

tax liability had not been recorded previously. In addition, a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded during 2018 in 

contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions.

On May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning 

substantially all of Southern Power’s solar facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion and, on December 11, 2018, sold a noncontrolling 

tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion. 

Additionally, on November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including 

the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million. The completion of 

the disposition is subject to the expansion unit reaching commercial operation as well as various other customary conditions to closing, 

including FERC and state commission approvals, and the sale is expected to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot 

be determined at this time. On December 4, 2018, Southern Power sold of all of its equity interests in the Florida Plants to NextEra Energy 

for approximately $203 million.

See Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.

Environmental Matters
The Southern Company system’s operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and 

regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The Southern Company system maintains comprehensive 

environmental compliance and GHG strategies to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental 

laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures, operations and maintenance costs, and costs reflected in ARO liabilities, 

required to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to achieve stated goals may impact future electric generating unit 

retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Related costs may result from the 

installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, or changing fuel sources for 

certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to the Southern Company system’s transmission and distribution (electric and natural 

gas) systems. A major portion of these costs is expected to be recovered through retail and wholesale rates. The ultimate impact of 

environmental laws and regulations and the GHG goals discussed herein will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and 

implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed technology, fuel prices, and the outcome of pending and/or 

future legal challenges.

New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the traditional electric operating companies’, Southern 

Power’s, and the natural gas distribution utilities’ operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. 

Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be recovered in rates on a timely basis for the 

traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities or through long-term wholesale agreements for the 
traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could 

38

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

contribute to reduced demand for electricity and natural gas, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and/or 

financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental 

requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity and natural gas.

The Southern Company system’s commitment to the environment has been demonstrated in many ways, including participating in 

partnerships resulting in approximately $140 million of funding that has restored or enhanced more than 2 million acres of habitat since 

2003; the removal of more than 15.5 million pounds of trash and debris from waterways between 2000 and 2018 through the Renew Our 
Rivers program; a 21.2% reduction in surface water withdrawal from 2015 to 2017; reductions in SO2 and NOX air emissions of 98% and 
89%, respectively, from 1990 to 2017; the reduction of mercury air emissions of over 95% from 2005 to 2017; and the Southern Company 

system’s changing energy mix.

Through 2018, the traditional electric operating companies have invested approximately $14.2 billion in environmental capital retrofit 

projects to comply with environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $1.3 billion, $0.9 billion, and $0.5 billion for 

2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and 

regulations are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or completed, 

the Southern Company system’s current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $1.4 billion from 2019 through 2023, with 

annual totals of approximately $0.5 billion, $0.2 billion, $0.3 billion, $0.3 billion, and $0.2 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, 
respectively. These estimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from 
fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See “Global Climate Issues” herein for additional information. The Southern Company system 

also anticipates substantial expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the CCR Rule, which are 

reflected in Southern Company’s ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – “Capital Requirements and Contractual 

Obligations” herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.

Environmental Laws and Regulations

Air Quality

The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, 
particulate matter, and SO2) to protect and improve the nation’s air quality, which it reviews and revises periodically. Following a NAAQS 
revision, states are required to develop an EPA-approved plan to protect air quality. These state plans can require additional emission 

controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and operational costs. NAAQS 

requirements can also adversely affect the siting of new electric generating facilities. All areas within the Southern Company system’s 

electric service territory have been designated as attainment for all NAAQS except for a seven-county area within metropolitan Atlanta 

that is not in attainment with the 2015 ozone NAAQS and the area surrounding Plant Hammond, in Georgia, which will not be designated 
attainment or nonattainment for the 2010 SO2 standard until December 2020. If areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, 
increased compliance costs could result. See “Regulatory Matters – Georgia Power – Integrated Resource Plan” herein for information 

regarding Georgia Power’s request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond.

In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to address impacts of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired 
electric generating plants. CSAPR establishes emissions trading programs and budgets for certain states and allocates emissions allowances 
for sources in those states. In 2016, the EPA published a final rule establishing more stringent ozone season NOX emissions budgets in 
Alabama, Mississippi, and Texas. Georgia’s ozone season NOX emissions budget remained unchanged. The EPA also removed North Carolina 
from this particular CSAPR program. The outcome of ongoing CSAPR litigation concerning the 2016 CSAPR rule, to which Mississippi 
Power is a party, could have an impact on the State of Mississippi’s ozone season NOX emissions budget. Increases in either future fossil 
fuel-fired generation or the availability or cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for 

Southern Company.

The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various federal 

agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress toward the goal 

of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States must submit a revised state 

implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA demonstrating continued reasonable progress towards achieving visibility improvement goals. These 
plans could require reductions in certain pollutants, such as particulate matter, SO2, and NOX, which could result in increased compliance 
costs. The EPA approved the regional progress SIPs for the States of Alabama and Georgia, but only issued a limited approval of the regional 

progress SIP for the State of Mississippi because Mississippi must revise the best available retrofit technology (BART) provisions of its 

SIP. Therefore, Mississippi Power’s Plant Daniel is the only electric generating unit in the Southern Company system that continues to be 

evaluated under the regional haze BART provisions. Mississippi Power is required to submit Plant Daniel’s BART analysis to the State of 

Mississippi by summer 2019. Requirements for further reduction of these pollutants at Plant Daniel could increase compliance costs.

39

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Water Quality

In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures 

(CWIS) to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life at existing power plants (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear generating 

plants) and manufacturing facilities. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable CWIS changes to protect 

organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). The Southern 

Company system is conducting these studies and currently anticipates applicable CWIS changes may include fish-friendly CWIS screens 

with fish return systems and minor additions of monitoring equipment at certain plants. However, the ultimate impact of this rule will 

depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies, any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant’s 

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors, and the outcome of any legal challenges.

In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule (2015 ELG Rule) that set national standards for 

wastewater discharges from new and existing steam electric generating units generating greater than 50 MWs. The 2015 ELG Rule prohibits 

effluent discharges of certain waste streams and imposes stringent limits on flue gas desulfurization (scrubber) wastewater discharges. 

The revised technology-based limits and the CCR Rule require extensive changes to existing ash and wastewater management systems 

or the installation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the 2015 ELG Rule is expected to 

require capital expenditures and increased operational costs primarily for the traditional electric operating companies’ coal-fired electric 

generation. State environmental agencies will incorporate specific compliance applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process for each 

ELG waste stream no later than December 31, 2023. The EPA is scheduled to issue a new rulemaking by December 2019 that could revise 

the limitations and applicability dates of two of the waste streams regulated in the 2015 ELG Rule. The impact of any changes to the 2015 

ELG Rule will depend on the content of the new rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.

In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters 

of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies 

(such as rivers, streams, canals, and wastewater treatment ponds), which could impact new generation projects and permitting and 

reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission, distribution, and pipeline projects. 

The EPA and the Corps are expected to publish a final rule in 2019 to replace the 2015 WOTUS definition. The impact of any changes to 

the 2015 WOTUS rule will depend on the content of this final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.

Coal Combustion Residuals

In 2015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in landfills and 

surface impoundments (ash ponds) at active generating power plants. In addition to the EPA’s CCR Rule, the States of Alabama and Georgia 

have also finalized regulations regarding the handling of CCR within their respective states. The EPA’s CCR Rule requires landfills and ash 

ponds to be evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not met. Closure of existing 

landfills and ash ponds could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the CCR Rule. Based 

on cost estimates for closure and monitoring of landfills and ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, the Southern Company system recorded 

AROs for each CCR unit in 2015. As further analysis was performed and closure details were developed, the traditional electric operating 

companies have continued to periodically update these cost estimates, as discussed further below.

The EPA published certain amendments to the CCR Rule, which became effective August 29, 2018. These amendments extend the date 
from April 2019 to October 31, 2020 to cease sending CCR and other waste streams to ash ponds that demonstrate compliance with all 

except two of the specified performance criteria.

On August 21, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision suggesting the EPA should regulate 

previously-excluded inactive ash ponds located at retired generation facilities and questioning both the ability of unlined ash ponds 

to continue operating no matter the performance criteria results and the classification of clay-lined landfills and ash ponds. These 

developments could impact the expected timing of the traditional electric operating companies’ landfill and ash pond closure activities, 

but the extent of any impact will depend on the outcome of ongoing litigation, anticipated EPA rulemaking action to establish further 

guidance, and the outcome of any legal challenges.

In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded an increase of approximately $1.2 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule. The revised cost 

estimates were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at plants operated by Alabama Power, including 

at a plant jointly-owned by Mississippi Power. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power’s management completed its analysis of 

these studies which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management 

requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of 

work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material.

40

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

In December 2018, Georgia Power recorded an increase of approximately $3.1 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and the related 

state rule. During the second half of 2018, Georgia Power completed a strategic assessment related to its plans to close the ash ponds 

at all of its generating plants in compliance with the CCR Rule and the related state rule. This assessment included engineering and 

constructability studies related to design assumptions for ash pond closures and advanced engineering methods. The results indicated that 

additional closure costs will be required to close these ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of 

ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. These factors also impact the 

estimated timing of future cash outlays.

The traditional electric operating companies expect to periodically update their ARO cost estimates. Absent continued recovery of ARO 

costs through regulated rates, Southern Company’s results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially impacted. 

See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – “Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations” herein and Note 6 to the financial 

statements for additional information.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

Nuclear Decommissioning

In June 2018, Alabama Power completed an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley. The estimated cost of 

decommissioning based on the study resulted in an increase in Alabama Power’s ARO liability of approximately $300 million. 

Amounts previously contributed to Alabama Power’s external trust funds are currently projected to be adequate to meet the updated 

decommissioning obligations. 

In December 2018, Georgia Power completed updated decommissioning cost site studies for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 

2. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the studies resulted in an increase in Georgia Power’s ARO liability of approximately 

$130 million. Georgia Power currently collects $4 million and $2 million annually in rates, which is used to fund external nuclear 

decommissioning trusts for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, respectively. Georgia Power expects the Georgia PSC to review 

and adjust, if necessary, these amounts in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.

See Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.

Environmental Remediation

The Southern Company system must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and 

releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Southern Company system could incur substantial costs to 

clean up affected sites. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities conduct studies to determine 

the extent of any required cleanup and Southern Company has recognized the estimated costs to clean up known impacted sites in its 

financial statements. Amounts for cleanup and ongoing monitoring costs were not material for any year presented. The traditional electric 

operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities in Illinois and Georgia have all received authority from their respective state 

PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies to recover approved environmental compliance costs through regulatory mechanisms. 

These regulatory mechanisms are adjusted annually or as necessary within limits approved by the state PSCs or other applicable state 

regulatory agencies. The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas may be liable for some or all required cleanup 

costs for additional sites that may require environmental remediation. See Note 3 to the financial statements under “Environmental 

Remediation” for additional information.

Global Climate Issues
On August 31, 2018, the EPA published a proposed rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which is intended to replace 

a regulation enacted in 2015 known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP), that would limit CO2 emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired electric 

generating units. The CPP has been stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court since 2016. The ACE Rule would require states to develop GHG 

unit-specific emission rate standards based on heat-rate efficiency improvements for existing fossil fuel-fired steam units. As proposed, 

combustion turbines, including natural gas combined cycles, are not affected sources. As of January 1, 2019, the Southern Company system 

has ownership interests in 40 fossil fuel-fired steam units to which the proposed ACE Rule is applicable. The ultimate impact of this rule 

to the Southern Company system is currently unknown and will depend on changes between the proposal and the final rule, subsequent 

state plan developments and requirements, and any associated legal challenges.

On December 20, 2018, the EPA published a proposed review of the Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from 

New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units final rule (2015 NSPS rule). The EPA’s final 2015 

NSPS rule set standards of performance for new, modified, and reconstructed electric utility generating units which included stationary 

combustion turbines and fossil-fired steam boilers. This proposal reduces the stringency of the 2015 NSPS rule by not basing the new and 

reconstructed fossil-fired steam boiler and IGCC standards on partial carbon capture and sequestration. The impact of any changes to this 
rule will depend on the content of the final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.

41

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Additional domestic GHG policies may emerge in the future requiring the United States to transition to a lower GHG emitting economy. The 

Southern Company system has transitioned from an electric generating mix of 70% coal and 15% natural gas in 2007 to a mix of 30% coal 

and 46% natural gas in 2018, along with over 8,000 MWs of renewable resources. This transition has been supported in part by the Southern 

Company system retiring 4,226 MWs of coal- and oil-fired generating capacity since 2010 and converting 3,280 MWs of generating capacity 

from coal to natural gas since 2015. In addition, Southern Company Gas has replaced approximately 5,600 miles of bare steel and cast-iron pipe, 

resulting in removal of approximately 2.5 million metric tons of GHG from its natural gas distribution system since 1998. Based on ownership or 

financial control of facilities, the Southern Company system’s 2017 GHG emissions (CO2 equivalent) were approximately 98 million metric tons, 

with 2018 emissions estimated at 98 million metric tons. This equates to a reduction of 36% between 2007 and 2018. The 2018 estimates 

include GHG emissions attributable to each of Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, Florida City Gas, and the Florida Plants through the date of the 

applicable disposition. See Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.

In April 2018, Southern Company established an intermediate goal of a 50% reduction in carbon emissions from 2007 levels by 2030 and 

a long-term goal of low- to no-carbon operations by 2050. To achieve these goals, the Southern Company system expects to continue 

growing its renewable energy portfolio, optimize technology advancements to modernize its transmission and distribution systems, 

increase the use of natural gas for generation, complete ongoing construction projects, including Georgia Power’s interest in Plant Vogtle 

Units 3 and 4, invest in energy efficiency, and continue research and development efforts focused on technologies to lower GHG emissions. 

The Southern Company system’s ability to achieve these goals also will be dependent on many external factors, including supportive 

national energy policies, low natural gas prices, and the development, deployment, and advancement of relevant energy technologies.

FERC Matters

Open Access Transmission Tariff
On May 10, 2018, AMEA and Cooperative Energy filed with the FERC a complaint against SCS and the traditional electric operating 

companies claiming that the current 11.25% base ROE used in calculating the annual transmission revenue requirements of the traditional 

electric operating companies’ open access transmission tariff is unjust and unreasonable as measured by the applicable FERC standards. 

The complaint requested that the base ROE be set no higher than 8.65% and that the FERC order refunds for the difference in revenue 

requirements that results from applying a just and reasonable ROE established in this proceeding upon determining the current ROE is unjust 

and unreasonable. On June 18, 2018, SCS and the traditional electric operating companies filed their response challenging the adequacy 

of the showing presented by the complainants and offering support for the current ROE. On September 6, 2018, the FERC issued an order 

establishing a refund effective date of May 10, 2018 in the event a refund is due and initiating an investigation and settlement procedures 

regarding the current base ROE. Through December 31, 2018, the estimated maximum potential refund is not expected to be material to 

Southern Company’s results of operations or cash flows. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

Southern Company Gas
Southern Company Gas’ gas pipeline investments business is involved in two significant pipeline construction projects, the Atlantic Coast 

Pipeline (5% ownership) and the PennEast Pipeline (20% ownership), which received FERC approval in October 2017 and January 2018, 

respectively. Southern Company Gas’ total capital expenditures, excluding AFUDC, at completion are expected to be between $350 million 

and $390 million for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and $276 million for the PennEast Pipeline. These projects, along with Southern Company 
Gas’ existing pipelines, are intended to provide diverse sources of natural gas supplies to customers, resolve current and long-term supply 

planning for new capacity, enhance system reliability, and generate economic development in the areas served.

Work continues with state and federal agencies to obtain the required permits to begin construction on the PennEast Pipeline. Any material 

delays may impact forecasted capital expenditures and the expected in-service date.

The Atlantic Coast Pipeline has experienced challenges to its permits since construction began in 2018. During the third and fourth quarters 

2018, a FERC stop work order, together with delays in obtaining permits necessary for construction and construction delays due to judicial 

actions, impacted the cost and schedule for the project. As a result, total project cost estimates have increased from between $6.0 billion 

and $6.5 billion to between $7.0 billion and $7.8 billion, excluding financing costs. Southern Company Gas’ share of the total project costs 

is 5% and Southern Company Gas’ investment at December 31, 2018 totaled $83 million. The operator of the joint venture currently 

expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for at least key segments of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, while the remainder may extend 

into early 2021. Southern Company Gas has evaluated the recoverability of its investment and determined there was no impairment as 

of December 31, 2018. Abnormal weather, work delays (including due to judicial or regulatory action), and other conditions may result in 

additional cost or schedule modifications, which could result in an impairment of Southern Company Gas’ investment and could have a 

material impact on Southern Company’s financial statements.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Notes 7 and 9 to the financial statements under “Southern 
Company Gas – Equity Method Investments” and “Guarantees,” respectively, for additional information on these pipeline projects.

42

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Regulatory Matters

Alabama Power
Alabama Power’s revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the 

Alabama PSC. Alabama Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business primarily through Rate RSE, Rate CNP, Rate ECR, 

and Rate NDR. In addition, the Alabama PSC issues accounting orders to address current events impacting Alabama Power. See Note 2 to the 

financial statements under “Alabama Power” for additional information regarding Alabama Power’s rate mechanisms and accounting orders.

Rate RSE

The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon Alabama Power’s projected weighted 

common equity return (WCER) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on forward-looking information for the 

applicable upcoming calendar year. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged together, cannot exceed 4.0% and 

any annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. When the projected WCER is under the allowed range, there is an adjusting point of 5.98% and 

eligibility for a performance-based adder of seven basis points, or 0.07%, to the WCER adjusting point if Alabama Power (i) has an “A” 

credit rating equivalent with at least one of the recognized rating agencies or (ii) is in the top one-third of a designated customer value 

benchmark survey. If Alabama Power’s actual retail return is above the allowed WCER range, the excess will be refunded to customers 

unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is no provision for additional customer billings should the actual retail return 

fall below the WCER range. Prior to January 2019, retail rates remained unchanged when the WCER range was between 5.75% and 6.21%.

On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments designed to position Alabama Power to 

address the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation, without increasing retail rates under Rate 

RSE in the near term. Alabama Power plans to reduce growth in total debt by increasing equity, with corresponding reductions in debt 

issuances, thereby de-leveraging its capital structure. Alabama Power’s goal is to achieve an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end 

of 2025. At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power’s equity ratio was approximately 47%.

The approved modifications to Rate RSE began for billings in January 2019. The modifications include reducing the top of the allowed WCER 

range from 6.21% to 6.15% and modifications to the refund mechanism applicable to prior year actual results. The modifications to the refund 

mechanism allow Alabama Power to retain a portion of the revenue that causes the actual WCER for a given year to exceed the allowed range.

Generally, if Alabama Power’s actual WCER is between 6.15% and 7.65%, customers will receive 25% of the amount between 6.15% and 

6.65%, 40% of the amount between 6.65% and 7.15%, and 75% of the amount between 7.15% and 7.65%. Customers will receive all 

amounts in excess of an actual WCER of 7.65%.

In conjunction with these modifications to Rate RSE, on May 8, 2018, Alabama Power consented to a moratorium on any upward 

adjustments under Rate RSE for 2019 and 2020 and will also return $50 million to customers through bill credits in 2019.

On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power made its required annual Rate RSE submission to the Alabama PSC of projected data for calendar 

year 2019. Projected earnings were within the specified range; therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remain unchanged for 2019.

At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power’s retail return exceeded the allowed WCER range, which resulted in Alabama Power establishing a 

regulatory liability of $109 million for Rate RSE refunds. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama 

Power will apply $75 million to reduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance and the remaining $34 million will be refunded to customers 

through bill credits in July through September 2019.

Rate CNP PPA

Alabama Power’s retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for adjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the placing of new 

generating facilities into retail service. Alabama Power may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under Rate CNP PPA. 

No adjustments to Rate CNP PPA occurred during the period 2016 through 2018 and no adjustment is expected in 2019.

In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $69 million of the 

December 31, 2016 Rate CNP PPA under recovered balance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset 

through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power’s next depreciation study, which is expected to occur 

no later than 2022.

Rate CNP Compliance

Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of Alabama Power’s retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and other such mandates 

directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar considerations impacting 

Alabama Power’s facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information and provides for the recovery 
of these costs pursuant to a factor that is calculated annually. Compliance costs to be recovered include operations and maintenance 

43

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP Compliance, as recorded on the financial 

statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes 

in the billing factor will have no significant effect on revenues or net income, but will affect annual cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP 

Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and depreciation generally will have no effect on net income.

In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under 

recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE 

will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power’s next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022.

On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power submitted calculations associated with its cost of complying with environmental mandates, as 

provided under Rate CNP Compliance. The filing reflected a projected unrecovered retail revenue requirement for environmental compliance 

of approximately $205 million, which is being recovered in the billing months of January 2019 through December 2019.

Tax Reform Accounting Order

On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorized Alabama Power to defer the benefits of federal excess 

deferred income taxes associated with the Tax Reform Legislation for the year ended December 31, 2018 as a regulatory liability and to 

use up to $30 million of such deferrals to offset under recovered amounts under Rate ECR. The estimated deferrals for the year ended 

December 31, 2018 totaled approximately $63 million, subject to adjustment following the filing of the 2018 tax return, of which 

$30 million was used to offset the Rate ECR under recovered balance and $33 million is recorded in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on 

the balance sheet to be used for the benefit of customers as determined by the Alabama PSC at a future date. See Note 10 to the financial 

statements under “Current and Deferred Income Taxes” for additional information.

Environmental Accounting Order

Based on an order from the Alabama PSC (Environmental Accounting Order), Alabama Power is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to 

record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site 

removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset is being amortized 

and recovered over the affected unit’s remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate 

CNP Compliance. At December 31, 2018, this regulatory asset had a balance of $42 million. See “Environmental Matters – Environmental 

Laws and Regulations” herein for additional information regarding environmental regulations.

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power determined that Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 (approximately 1,000 MWs) will be 

retired by April 15, 2019 due to the expected costs of compliance with federal and state environmental regulations. In accordance with 

the Environmental Accounting Order, approximately $740 million of net investment costs will be transferred to a regulatory asset at the 

retirement date and recovered over the affected units’ remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision to retire.

Georgia Power
Georgia Power’s revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of 

the Georgia PSC. Georgia Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business through the 2013 ARP, which includes 

traditional base tariff rates, Demand-Side Management (DSM) tariffs, Environmental Compliance Cost Recovery (ECCR) tariffs, and 
Municipal Franchise Fee (MFF) tariffs. Georgia Power is scheduled to file a base rate case by July 1, 2019, which may continue or modify 

these tariffs. In addition, financing costs on certified construction costs of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are being collected through the 

NCCR tariff and fuel costs are collected through a separate fuel cost recovery tariff. See Note 2 to the financial statements under 

“Georgia Power” for additional information.

Rate Plans

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement related to Southern Company’s acquisition of Southern Company Gas 

approved by the Georgia PSC in 2016, the 2013 ARP will continue in effect until December 31, 2019, and Georgia Power will be required to 

file its next base rate case by July 1, 2019. Furthermore, through December 31, 2019, Georgia Power will retain its merger savings, net of 

transition costs, as defined in the settlement agreement; through December 31, 2022, such net merger savings will be shared on a 60/40 

basis with customers; thereafter, all merger savings will be retained by customers. See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern 

Company Merger with Southern Company Gas” for additional information regarding the Merger.

There were no changes to Georgia Power’s traditional base tariff rates, ECCR tariff, DSM tariffs, or MFF tariff in 2017 or 2018.

Under the 2013 ARP, Georgia Power’s retail ROE is set at 10.95% and earnings are evaluated against a retail ROE range of 10.00% to 

12.00%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 12.00% will be directly refunded to customers, with the remaining one-third retained by 

Georgia Power. There will be no recovery of any earnings shortfall below 10.00% on an actual basis. In 2016, Georgia Power’s retail ROE 
exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power refunded to retail customers in 2018 approximately $40 million as approved by the Georgia PSC. 

44

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

On February 5, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved a settlement between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC under which 

Georgia Power’s retail ROE for 2017 was stipulated to exceed 12.00% and Georgia Power will reduce certain regulatory assets by 

approximately $4 million in lieu of providing refunds to retail customers. In 2018, Georgia Power’s retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia 

Power accrued approximately $100 million to refund to retail customers, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC.

On April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Georgia Power Tax 

Reform Settlement Agreement, to reflect the federal income tax rate reduction impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, Georgia Power will 

refund to customers a total of $330 million through bill credits. Georgia Power issued bill credits of approximately $130 million in 2018 and 

will issue bill credits of approximately $95 million in June 2019 and $105 million in February 2020. In addition, Georgia Power is deferring 

as a regulatory liability (i) the revenue equivalent of the tax expense reduction resulting from legislation lowering the Georgia state income 

tax rate from 6.00% to 5.75% in 2019 and (ii) the entire benefit of federal and state excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which is 

expected to total approximately $700 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018, the related regulatory liability balance totaled 

$610 million. The amortization of these regulatory liabilities is expected to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. If 

there is not a base rate case in 2019, customers will receive $185 million in annual bill credits beginning in 2020, with any additional 

federal and state income tax savings deferred as a regulatory liability, until Georgia Power’s next base rate case.

To address some of the negative cash flow and credit quality impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Georgia PSC also approved an 

increase in Georgia Power’s retail equity ratio to the lower of (i) Georgia Power’s actual common equity weight in its capital structure or 

(ii) 55%, until the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power’s actual retail common equity ratio (on a 

13-month average basis) was approximately 55%. Benefits from reduced federal income tax rates in excess of the amounts refunded to 

customers will be retained by Georgia Power to cover the carrying costs of the incremental equity in 2018 and 2019.

Integrated Resource Plan

See “Environmental Matters” herein for additional information regarding proposed and final EPA rules and regulations, including revisions to 
ELG for steam electric power plants and additional regulations of CCR and CO2.

In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power’s triennial Integrated Resource Plan (2016 IRP) including the reclassification of the 

remaining net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date to 

a regulatory asset. Recovery of the unit’s net book value will continue through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP. The timing 

of the recovery of the remaining balance of the unit’s net book value as of December 31, 2019 and costs associated with materials and 

supplies remaining at the unit retirement date was deferred for consideration in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.

In the 2016 IRP, the Georgia PSC also approved recovery of costs up to $99 million through June 30, 2019 to preserve nuclear generation 

as an option at a future generation site in Stewart County, Georgia. In March 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power’s decision to 

suspend work at the site due to changing economics, including lower load forecasts and fuel costs. The timing of recovery for costs incurred 

of approximately $50 million is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.

On January 31, 2019, Georgia Power filed its triennial IRP (2019 IRP). The filing includes a request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond 

Units 1 through 4 (840 MWs) and Plant McIntosh Unit 1 (142.5 MWs) upon approval of the 2019 IRP.

In the 2019 IRP, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value of Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 

(approximately $520 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized ratably over a period equal 

to the applicable unit’s remaining useful life through 2035. For Plant McIntosh Unit 1, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the 

remaining net book value (approximately $40 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized over 

a three-year period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Georgia Power also requested approval to reclassify any 

unusable material and supplies inventory balances remaining at the applicable unit’s retirement date to a regulatory asset for recovery over 

a period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.

The 2019 IRP also includes a request to certify approximately 25 MWs of capacity at Plant Scherer Unit 3 for the retail jurisdiction 

beginning January 1, 2020, following the expiration of a wholesale PPA.

The 2019 IRP also includes details regarding ARO costs associated with ash pond and landfill closures and post-closure care. Georgia 

Power requested the timing and rate of recovery of these costs be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate 

Case. See “Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals” and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND 

LIQUIDITY – “Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations” herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information 

regarding Georgia Power’s AROs.

45

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Georgia Power also requested approval to issue two capacity-based requests for proposals (RFP). If approved, the first capacity-based 

RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2022 or 2023 and the second capacity-based RFP will seek resources that 

can provide capacity beginning in 2026, 2027, or 2028. Additionally, the 2019 IRP includes a request to procure an additional 1,000 MWs 

of renewable resources through a competitive bidding process. Georgia Power also proposed to invest in a portfolio of up to 50 MWs of 

battery energy storage technologies.

A decision from the Georgia PSC on the 2019 IRP is expected in mid-2019.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

Storm Damage Recovery

Georgia Power is accruing $30 million annually through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP, for incremental operations and 

maintenance costs of damage from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. At December 31, 2018, the total balance 

in the regulatory asset related to storm damage was $416 million. During October 2018, Hurricane Michael caused significant damage 

to Georgia Power’s transmission and distribution facilities. The incremental restoration costs related to this hurricane deferred in the 

regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $115 million. Hurricanes Irma and Matthew also caused significant damage to 

Georgia Power’s transmission and distribution facilities during September 2017 and October 2016, respectively. The incremental restoration 

costs related to Hurricanes Irma and Matthew deferred in Georgia Power’s regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately 

$250 million. The rate of storm damage cost recovery is expected to be adjusted as part of the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case and 

further adjusted in future regulatory proceedings as necessary. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. 

See Note 2 to the financial statements under “Georgia Power – Storm Damage Recovery” for additional information regarding Georgia 

Power’s storm damage reserve.

Mississippi Power
Mississippi Power’s retail base rates generally are set under the PEP, a rate plan approved by the Mississippi PSC. Two filings are made 

for each calendar year: the PEP projected filing, which is typically filed prior to the beginning of the year based on a projected revenue 

requirement, and the PEP lookback filing, which is filed after the end of the year and allows for review of the actual revenue requirement 

compared to the projected filing.

On February 7, 2018, Mississippi Power revised its annual projected PEP filing for 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. 

The revised filing requested an increase of $26 million in annual revenues, based on a performance adjusted ROE of 9.33% and an increased 

equity ratio of 55%. On July 27, 2018, Mississippi Power and the MPUS entered into a settlement agreement with respect to the 2018 PEP 

filing and all unresolved PEP filings for prior years (PEP Settlement Agreement), which was approved by the Mississippi PSC on August 7, 

2018. Rates under the PEP Settlement Agreement became effective with the first billing cycle of September 2018. The PEP Settlement 

Agreement provides for an increase of approximately $21.6 million in annual base retail revenues, which excludes certain compensation 

costs contested by the MPUS, as well as approximately $2 million which was subsequently approved for recovery through Mississippi 

Power’s 2018 Energy Efficiency Cost Rider.

Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, Mississippi Power’s performance-adjusted allowed ROE is 9.31% and its allowed equity ratio 

is capped at 51%, pending further review by the Mississippi PSC. In lieu of the requested equity ratio increase, Mississippi Power retained 

$44 million of excess accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation until the conclusion of Mississippi 

Power’s next base rate case, which is scheduled to be filed in the fourth quarter 2019 (Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case). Further, 

Mississippi Power agreed to seek equity contributions sufficient to restore its equity ratio to 50% by December 31, 2018.

Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, PEP proceedings are suspended until after the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base 

Rate Case and Mississippi Power is not required to make any PEP filings for regulatory years 2018, 2019, and 2020. The PEP Settlement 

Agreement also resolved all open PEP filings with no change to customer rates.

Kemper County Energy Facility

In 2018, Mississippi Power recorded pre-tax charges to income of $37 million ($27 million after tax), primarily resulting from the 

abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at 

the Kemper County energy facility. In addition, Mississippi Power recorded a credit to earnings of $95 million in the fourth quarter 2018 

primarily resulting from the reduction of a valuation allowance for a state income tax net operating loss (NOL) carryforward associated 

with the Kemper County energy facility. Additional closure costs for the mine and gasifier-related assets, currently estimated at up to 

$10 million pre-tax (excluding salvage, net of dismantlement costs), may be incurred through the first half of 2020. In addition, period 

costs, including, but not limited to, costs for compliance and safety, ARO accretion, and property taxes for the mine and gasifier-related 

assets, are estimated to total $11 million in 2019 and $2 million to $4 million annually in 2020 through 2023. Mississippi Power is currently 
evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to 

46

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

be complete later in 2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the CO2 pipeline, the cost of removal could have a material 

impact on Southern Company’s financial statements. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

The combined cycle and associated common facilities portions of the Kemper County energy facility were dedicated as Plant Ratcliffe on 

April 27, 2018.

For additional information on the Kemper County energy facility, see Note 2 to the financial statements under “Mississippi Power – Kemper 

County Energy Facility.”

Reserve Margin Plan

On August 6, 2018, Mississippi Power filed its proposed Reserve Margin Plan (RMP), as required by the Mississippi PSC’s order in the docket 

established for the purposes of pursuing a global settlement of the costs related to the Kemper County energy facility. Under the RMP, 

Mississippi Power proposed alternatives that would reduce its reserve margin, with the most economic of the alternatives being the two-

year and seven-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Watson Units 4 and 5, respectively, to the first quarter 2022 and the four-year 

acceleration of the retirement of Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 to the third quarter 2021 and the third quarter 2022, respectively, 

in order to lower or avoid operating costs. The Plant Greene County unit retirements would require the completion by Alabama Power of 

proposed transmission and system reliability improvements, as well as agreement by Alabama Power. The RMP filing also states that, in 

the event the Mississippi PSC ultimately approves an alternative that includes an accelerated retirement, Mississippi Power would require 

authorization to defer in a regulatory asset for future recovery the remaining net book value of the units at the time of retirement. A 

decision by the Mississippi PSC that does not include recovery of the remaining book value of any generating units retired could have a 

material impact on Southern Company’s financial statements. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

Government Grants

In 2010, the DOE, through a cooperative agreement with SCS, agreed to fund $270 million of the Kemper County energy facility through 

the grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2. Through December 31, 2018, Mississippi 

Power received total DOE grants of $387 million, of which $382 million reduced the construction costs of the Kemper County energy 

facility and $5 million reimbursed Mississippi Power for expenses associated with DOE reporting. On December 12, 2018, Mississippi Power 

filed with the DOE its request for property closeout certification under the contract related to the grants received. Mississippi Power and 

the DOE are currently in discussions regarding the requested closeout and property disposition, which may require payment to the DOE for 

a portion of certain property that is to be retained by Mississippi Power. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this 

time; however, it could have a significant impact on Southern Company’s financial statements.

Southern Company Gas
The natural gas distribution utilities are subject to regulation and oversight by their respective state regulatory agencies for the rates 

charged to their customers and other matters.

The natural gas market for Atlanta Gas Light was deregulated in 1997. Accordingly, Marketers, rather than a traditional utility, sell natural 

gas to end-use customers in Georgia and handle customer billing functions. Atlanta Gas Light earns revenue for its distribution services by 

charging rates to its customers based primarily on monthly fixed charges that are set by the Georgia PSC and adjusted periodically.

With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the natural gas distribution utilities are authorized by the relevant regulatory agencies in the 

states in which they serve to use natural gas cost recovery mechanisms that adjust rates to reflect changes in the wholesale cost of natural 

gas and ensure recovery of all costs prudently incurred in purchasing natural gas for customers. Natural gas cost recovery revenues are 

adjusted for differences in actual recoverable natural gas costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Changes in the billing factor 

will not have a significant effect on revenues or net income, but will affect cash flows. In addition to natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, 

there are other cost recovery mechanisms, such as regulatory riders, which vary by utility but allow recovery of certain costs, such as 

those related to infrastructure replacement programs, as well as environmental remediation and energy efficiency plans. See Note 1 to the 

financial statements under “Cost of Natural Gas” for additional information.

Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects

In addition to capital expenditures recovered through base rates by each of the natural gas distribution utilities, Nicor Gas and Virginia 

Natural Gas have separate rate riders that provide timely recovery of capital expenditures for specific infrastructure replacement programs. 

These infrastructure replacement programs and capital projects are risk-based and designed to update and replace cast iron, bare steel, 

and mid-vintage plastic materials or expand the natural gas distribution systems to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility and 

growth. The total expected investment under the infrastructure replacement programs for 2019 is $408 million. See Note 2 to the financial 

statements under “Southern Company Gas – Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects” for additional information.

47

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Rate Proceedings

On February 23, 2018, Atlanta Gas Light revised its annual base rate filing to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation and 

requested a $16 million rate reduction in 2018. On May 15, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation for Atlanta Gas Light’s annual 

base rates to remain at the 2017 level for 2018 and 2019, with customer credits of $8 million in each of July 2018 and October 2018 to 

reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Georgia PSC maintained Atlanta Gas Light’s previously authorized earnings band 

based on a ROE between 10.55% and 10.95% and increased the allowed equity ratio by 4% to an equity ratio of 55% to address the 

negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Additionally, Atlanta Gas Light is required to file a traditional 

base rate case on or before June 1, 2019 for rates effective January 1, 2020.

On January 31, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved a $137 million increase in Nicor Gas’ annual base rate revenues, including $93 million 
related to the recovery of investments under Nicor Gas’ infrastructure program, effective February 8, 2018, based on a ROE of 9.8%.

On May 2, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas’ rehearing request for revised base rates to incorporate the reduction in the 
federal income tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. The resulting decrease of approximately $44 million in annual base rate 
revenues became effective May 5, 2018. Nicor Gas’ previously-authorized capital structure and ROE of 9.80% were not addressed in the 
rehearing and remain unchanged. On November 9, 2018, Nicor Gas filed a general base rate case with the Illinois Commission requesting 
a $230 million increase in annual base rate revenues. The requested increase is based on a projected test year for the 12-month period 
ending September 30, 2020, a ROE of 10.6%, and an increase in the equity ratio from 52.0% to 54.0% to address the negative cash flow 
and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Illinois Commission is expected to rule on the requested increase within the 
11-month statutory time limit, after which rate adjustments will be effective. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined 

at this time.

Fuel Cost Recovery
The traditional electric operating companies each have established fuel cost recovery rates approved by their respective state PSCs. 
Fuel cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. 
Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on Southern Company’s revenues or net income, but will affect 
cash flow. The traditional electric operating companies continuously monitor their under or over recovered fuel cost balances and make 
appropriate filings with their state PSCs to adjust fuel cost recovery rates as necessary.

See Note 1 to the financial statements under “Revenues” and Note 2 to the financial statements under “Alabama Power – Rate ECR,” 

“Georgia Power – Fuel Cost Recovery,” and “Mississippi Power – Fuel Cost Recovery” for additional information.

Construction Program

Overview
The subsidiary companies of Southern Company are engaged in continuous construction programs to accommodate existing and estimated 
future loads on their respective systems. The Southern Company system intends to continue its strategy of developing and constructing 
new electric generating facilities, adding environmental modifications to certain existing units, expanding and improving the electric 
transmission and distribution systems, and updating and expanding the natural gas distribution systems. For the traditional electric 
operating companies, major generation construction projects are subject to state PSC approval in order to be included in retail rates. 
While Southern Power generally constructs and acquires generation assets covered by long-term PPAs, any uncontracted capacity could 
negatively affect future earnings. Southern Company Gas is engaged in various infrastructure improvement programs designed to update 
or expand the natural gas distribution systems of the natural gas distribution utilities to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility 
and growth. The natural gas distribution utilities recover their investment and a return associated with these infrastructure programs 
through their regulated rates. See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Power” for additional information about costs 
relating to Southern Power’s acquisitions that involve construction of renewable energy facilities and Note 2 to the financial statements 
under “Southern Company Gas – Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects” for additional information regarding 
infrastructure improvement programs at the natural gas distribution utilities.

The Southern Company system’s construction program is currently estimated to total approximately $8.0 billion, $7.7 billion, $6.7 billion, 
$6.3 billion, and $6.0 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. The largest construction project currently underway in 
the Southern Company system is Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (45.7% ownership interest by Georgia Power in the two units, each with 
approximately 1,100 MWs). See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – “Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations” herein for 

additional information regarding Southern Company’s capital requirements for its subsidiaries’ construction programs.

48

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Nuclear Construction
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant 
Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In 2012, the NRC issued the related combined construction and operating licenses, which allowed full construction 
of the two AP1000 nuclear units (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each) and related facilities to begin. Until 
March 2017, construction on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continued under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, which was a substantially fixed 
price agreement. In March 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

In connection with the EPC Contractor’s bankruptcy filing, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered 
into the Interim Assessment Agreement with the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue. The Interim Assessment Agreement 
expired in July 2017 when Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, and the EPC Contractor entered into 
the Vogtle Services Agreement. Under the Vogtle Services Agreement, Westinghouse provides facility design and engineering services, 
procurement and technical support, and staff augmentation on a time and materials cost basis. The Vogtle Services Agreement provides 
that it will continue until the start-up and testing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are complete and electricity is generated and sold from 

both units. The Vogtle Services Agreement is terminable by the Vogtle Owners upon 30 days’ written notice.

In October 2017, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, executed the Bechtel Agreement, a cost reimbursable 
plus fee arrangement, whereby Bechtel is reimbursed for actual costs plus a base fee and an at-risk fee, which is subject to adjustment based on 
Bechtel’s performance against cost and schedule targets. Each Vogtle Owner is severally (not jointly) liable for its proportionate share, based on 
its ownership interest, of all amounts owed to Bechtel under the Bechtel Agreement. The Vogtle Owners may terminate the Bechtel Agreement 
at any time for their convenience, provided that the Vogtle Owners will be required to pay amounts related to work performed prior to the 
termination (including the applicable portion of the base fee), certain termination-related costs, and, at certain stages of the work, the applicable 
portion of the at-risk fee. Bechtel may terminate the Bechtel Agreement under certain circumstances, including certain Vogtle Owner suspensions 
of work, certain breaches of the Bechtel Agreement by the Vogtle Owners, Vogtle Owner insolvency, and certain other events. Pursuant to 
the Loan Guarantee Agreement between Georgia Power and the DOE, Georgia Power is required to obtain the DOE’s approval of the Bechtel 

Agreement prior to obtaining any further advances under the Loan Guarantee Agreement.

Cost and Schedule

Georgia Power’s approximate proportionate share of the remaining estimated capital cost to complete Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 by the 

expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, is as follows:

Base project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
Construction contingency estimate
Total project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
Net investment as of December 31, 2018(b)
Remaining estimate to complete(a)

(in billions)

$ 8.0
0.4
8.4
(4.6)
$ 3.8

(a)  Excludes financing costs expected to be capitalized through AFUDC of approximately $315 million.
(b)  Net of $1.7 billion received from Toshiba under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds.

Georgia Power estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of 
which $1.9 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2018.

As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, 
and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any required engineering 
changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial 
operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated 
cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly 
throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft 
laborers must be retained and deployed.

Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity 
to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of 
commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, 
was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does 
not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected 
in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate 
impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the 
results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.

49

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state 
level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified 
in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern 
Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests 
have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the 
timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require 
other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there 
may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, any extension of the project schedule is currently 
estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power’s ownership interests, 
and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital 
cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost 
forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could 

be material.

Joint Owner Contracts

In November 2017, the Vogtle Owners entered into an amendment to their joint ownership agreements for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to 

provide for, among other conditions, additional Vogtle Owner approval requirements. Effective August 31, 2018, the Vogtle Owners further 

amended the joint ownership agreements to clarify and provide procedures for certain provisions of the joint ownership agreements 

related to adverse events that require the vote of the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 

to continue construction (as amended, and together with the November 2017 amendment, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements). 

The Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements also confirm that the Vogtle Owners’ sole recourse against Georgia Power or Southern Nuclear 

for any action or inaction in connection with their performance as agent for the Vogtle Owners is limited to removal of Georgia Power 

and/or Southern Nuclear as agent, except in cases of willful misconduct.

As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power’s decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase 

in the base capital costs as described below, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were 

required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of 

Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.

Amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements

In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet with the other Vogtle 

Owners and MEAG’s wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC (MEAG SPVM), and MEAG Power SPVP, LLC (MEAG 

SPVP) to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners, including additional 

amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements and the purchase of PTCs from the other Vogtle Owners, and (ii) the MEAG 

Term Sheet with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ’s ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 

4 (Project J) under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to 

implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet (MEAG Funding Agreement). On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle 

Owners, and MEAG’s wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG SPVM, and MEAG SPVP entered into certain amendments to the Vogtle 

Joint Ownership Agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet (Global Amendments).

Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements were 

modified as follows: (i) each Vogtle Owner must pay its proportionate share of qualifying construction costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 

and 4 based on its ownership percentage up to the estimated cost at completion (EAC) for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which formed 

the basis of Georgia Power’s forecast of $8.4 billion in the nineteenth VCM plus $800 million; (ii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 

55.7% of actual qualifying construction costs between $800 million and $1.6 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in 

$80 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 44.3% of such costs pro rata 

in accordance with their respective ownership interests; and (iii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 65.7% of qualifying construction 

costs between $1.6 billion and $2.1 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in a further $100 million of potential additional 

costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 34.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective 

ownership interests.

If the EAC is revised and exceeds the EAC in the nineteenth VCM by more than $2.1 billion, each of the other Vogtle Owners will have a 

one-time option at the time the project budget forecast is so revised to tender a portion of its ownership interest to Georgia Power in 

exchange for Georgia Power’s agreement to pay 100% of such Vogtle Owner’s remaining share of total construction costs in excess of the 
EAC in the nineteenth VCM plus $2.1 billion. In this event, Georgia Power will have the option of cancelling the project in lieu of purchasing 
a portion of the ownership interest of any other Vogtle Owner. If Georgia Power accepts the offer to purchase a portion of another 

50

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Vogtle Owner’s ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, the ownership interest(s) to be conveyed from the tendering Vogtle 

Owner(s) to Georgia Power will be calculated based on the proportion of the cumulative amount of construction costs paid by each such 

tendering Vogtle Owner(s) and by Georgia Power as of the COD of Plant Vogtle Unit 4. For purposes of this calculation, payments made by 

Georgia Power on behalf of another Vogtle Owner in accordance with the second and third items described in the paragraph above will be 

treated as payments made by the applicable Vogtle Owner.

In the event the actual costs of construction at completion of a Unit are less than the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report and such 

Unit is placed in service in accordance with the schedule projected in the nineteenth VCM report (i.e., Plant Vogtle Unit 3 is placed in service 

by November 2021 or Plant Vogtle Unit 4 is placed in service by November 2022), Georgia Power will be entitled to 60.7% of the cost 

savings with respect to the relevant Unit and the remaining Vogtle Owners will be entitled to 39.3% of such savings on a pro rata basis in 

accordance with their respective ownership interests.

For purposes of the foregoing provisions, qualifying construction costs will not include costs (i) resulting from force majeure events, 

including governmental actions or inactions (or significant delays associated with issuance of such actions) that affect the licensing, 

completion, start-up, operations, or financing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, administrative proceedings or litigation regarding ITAAC or 

other regulatory challenges to commencement of operation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and changes in laws or regulations governing 
Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, (ii) legal fees and legal expenses incurred due to litigation with contractors or subcontractors that are 
not subsidiaries or affiliates of Southern Company, and (iii) additional costs caused by requests from the Vogtle Owners other than 
Georgia Power, except for the exercise of a right to vote granted under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, that increase costs by 
$100,000 or more.

Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership 
Agreements requiring that Vogtle Owners holding 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 vote to continue 
construction following certain adverse events (Project Adverse Events) were modified. Pursuant to the Global Amendments, the holders of 
at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 must vote to continue construction if certain Project Adverse Events 
occur, including: (i) the bankruptcy of Toshiba; (ii) the termination or rejection in bankruptcy of certain agreements, including the Vogtle 
Services Agreement, the Bechtel Agreement, or the agency agreement with Southern Nuclear; (iii) Georgia Power publicly announces its 
intention not to submit for rate recovery any portion of its investment in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the Georgia PSC determines that 
any of Georgia Power’s costs relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will not be recovered in retail rates, excluding any 
additional amounts paid by Georgia Power on behalf of the other Vogtle Owners pursuant to the Global Amendments described above 
and the first 6% of costs during any six-month VCM reporting period that are disallowed by the Georgia PSC for recovery, or for which 
Georgia Power elects not to seek cost recovery, through retail rates; and (iv) an incremental extension of one year or more over the most 
recently approved schedule. Under the Global Amendments, Georgia Power may cancel the project at any time in its sole discretion.

In addition, pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the required approval of holders of ownership interests in Plant Vogtle 
Units 3 and 4 is at least (i) 90% for a change of the primary construction contractor and (ii) 67% for material amendments to the Vogtle 
Services Agreement or agreements with Southern Nuclear or the primary construction contractor, including the Bechtel Agreement.

The Global Amendments provide that if the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests fail to vote in favor of continuing the 
project following any future Project Adverse Event, work on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will continue for a period of 30 days if the holders 
of more than 50% of the ownership interests vote in favor of continuing construction (Majority Voting Owners). In such a case, the Vogtle 
Owners (i) have agreed to negotiate in good faith towards the resumption of the project, (ii) if no agreement is reached during such 30-day 
period, the project will be cancelled, and (iii) in the event of such a cancellation, the Majority Voting Owners will be obligated to reimburse 
any other Vogtle Owner for the incremental costs it incurred during such 30-day negotiation period.

Purchase of PTCs During Commercial Operation
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, Georgia Power has agreed to purchase additional 
PTCs from OPC, Dalton, MEAG SPVM, MEAG SPVP, and MEAG SPVJ (to the extent any MEAG SPVJ PTC rights remain after any purchases 
required under the MEAG Funding Agreement as described below) at varying purchase prices dependent upon the actual cost to complete 
construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 as compared to the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report. The purchases are at the option 
of the applicable Vogtle Owner.

Potential Funding to MEAG Project J
Pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement, and consistent with the MEAG Term Sheet, if MEAG SPVJ is unable to make its payments 
due under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements solely as a result of the occurrence of one of the following situations that materially 
impedes access to capital markets for MEAG for Project J: (i) the conduct of JEA or the City of Jacksonville, such as JEA’s legal challenges of 
its obligations under a PPA with MEAG (PPA-J), or (ii) PPA-J is declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction or rejected by JEA under 
the applicable provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (each of (i) and (ii), a JEA Default), at MEAG’s request, Georgia Power will purchase 

51

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

from MEAG SPVJ the rights to PTCs attributable to MEAG SPVJ’s share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (approximately 206 MWs) within 
30 days of such request at varying prices dependent upon the stage of construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The aggregate purchase 
price of the PTCs, together with any advances made as described in the next paragraph, shall not exceed $300 million.

At the option of MEAG, as an alternative or supplement to Georgia Power’s purchase of PTCs as described above, Georgia Power has agreed 
to provide up to $250 million in funding to MEAG for Project J in the form of advances (either advances under the Vogtle Joint Ownership 
Agreements or the purchase of MEAG Project J bonds, at the discretion of Georgia Power), subject to any required approvals of the Georgia 
PSC and the DOE.

In the event MEAG SPVJ certifies to Georgia Power that it is unable to fund its obligations under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements 
as a result of a JEA Default and Georgia Power becomes obligated to provide funding as described above, MEAG is required to (i) assign 
to Georgia Power its right to vote on any future Project Adverse Event and (ii) diligently pursue JEA for its breach of PPA-J. In addition, 
Georgia Power agreed that it will not sue MEAG for any amounts due from MEAG SPVJ under MEAG’s guarantee of MEAG SPVJ’s 
obligations so long as MEAG SPVJ complies with the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement as to its payment obligations and the other 
non-payment provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements.

Under the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement, Georgia Power may cancel the project in lieu of providing funding in the form of 
advances or PTC purchases.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

Regulatory Matters

In 2009, the Georgia PSC voted to certify construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with a certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. In 

addition, in 2009 the Georgia PSC approved inclusion of the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 related CWIP accounts in rate base, and the State of 

Georgia enacted the Georgia Nuclear Energy Financing Act, which allows Georgia Power to recover financing costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 

and 4. Financing costs are recovered on all applicable certified costs through annual adjustments to the NCCR tariff up to the certified 

capital cost of $4.418 billion. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had recovered approximately $1.9 billion of financing costs. Financing 

costs related to capital costs above $4.418 billion will be recovered through AFUDC; however, Georgia Power will not record AFUDC 

related to any capital costs in excess of the total deemed reasonable by the Georgia PSC (currently $7.3 billion) and not requested for rate 

recovery. On December 18, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power’s request to increase the NCCR tariff by $88 million annually, 

effective January 1, 2019.

Georgia Power is required to file semi-annual VCM reports with the Georgia PSC by February 28 and August 31 of each year. In 2013, in 

connection with the eighth VCM report, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC 

to waive the requirement to amend the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 certificate in accordance with the 2009 certification order until the 

completion of Plant Vogtle Unit 3, or earlier if deemed appropriate by the Georgia PSC and Georgia Power.

In 2016, the Georgia PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement (Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement) resolving certain prudency 

matters in connection with the fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC voted to approve (and issued its related 

order on January 11, 2018) Georgia Power’s seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction with 

Southern Nuclear as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, and modified the Vogtle Cost Settlement 
Agreement. The Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, as modified by the January 11, 2018 order, resolved the following regulatory matters 

related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4: (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the 

fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (ii) the Contractor Settlement Agreement was 

reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate 

base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with 

the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) Georgia Power would have the burden to show that any capital costs above 

$5.68 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under 

the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 

4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed 

reasonable Georgia Power’s revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, 

respectively; (vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will 

be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff (a) from 10.95% 

(the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in the 2013 ARP) to 10.00% effective January 1, 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 

8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the ROE in no case will be 

less than Georgia Power’s average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for AFUDC equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 

from 10.00% to Georgia Power’s average cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and (ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching 

commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the Vogtle 
Cost Settlement Agreement. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational 

52

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each 

month (but not lower than Georgia Power’s average cost of long-term debt) until the respective Unit is commercially operational. The ROE 

reductions negatively impacted earnings by approximately $100 million, $25 million, and $20 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, 

and are estimated to have negative earnings impacts of approximately $75 million in 2019 and an aggregate of approximately $615 million 

from 2020 to 2022.

In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power’s 

seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.

On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. (GIPL) and Partnership for Southern Equity, Inc. (PSE) filed a petition appealing 

the Georgia PSC’s January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. On March 8, 2018, Georgia Watch filed a similar appeal to 

the Fulton County Superior Court for judicial review of the Georgia PSC’s decision and denial of Georgia Watch’s motion for reconsideration. 

On December 21, 2018, the Fulton County Superior Court granted Georgia Power’s motion to dismiss the two appeals. On January 9, 2019, 

GIPL, PSE, and Georgia Watch filed an appeal of this decision with the Georgia Court of Appeals. Georgia Power believes the appeal has 

no merit; however, an adverse outcome in the appeal combined with subsequent adverse action by the Georgia PSC could have a material 

impact on Southern Company’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

In preparation for its nineteenth VCM filing, Georgia Power requested Southern Nuclear to perform a full cost reforecast for the project. 

This reforecast, performed prior to the nineteenth VCM filing, resulted in a $0.7 billion increase to the base capital cost forecast reported in 

the second quarter 2018. This base cost increase primarily resulted from changed assumptions related to the finalization of contract scopes 

and management responsibilities for Bechtel and over 60 subcontractors, labor productivity rates, and craft labor incentives, as well as the 

related levels of project management, oversight, and support, including field supervision and engineering support.

Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC’s 

order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, 

Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for these cost increases included in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing 

costs) in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs 

currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base 

capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included 

in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by 

management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to 

income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018, which includes the total increase in the base capital cost forecast 

and construction contingency estimate.

On August 31, 2018, Georgia Power filed its nineteenth VCM report with the Georgia PSC, which requested approval of $578 million of 

construction capital costs incurred from January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018. On February 19, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved the 

nineteenth VCM, but deferred approval of $51.6 million of expenditures related to Georgia Power’s portion of an administrative claim filed 

in the Westinghouse bankruptcy proceedings. Through the nineteenth VCM, the Georgia PSC has approved total construction capital costs 

incurred through June 30, 2018 of $5.4 billion (before $1.7 billion of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and 

approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). In addition, the staff of the Georgia PSC requested, and Georgia Power agreed, to 

file its twentieth VCM report concurrently with the twenty-first VCM report by August 31, 2019.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

DOE Financing

At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 costs through the Loan Guarantee 

Agreement and a multi-advance credit facility among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB, which provides for borrowings of up 

to $3.46 billion, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to 

Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion in additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. In September 

2018, the DOE extended the conditional commitment to March 31, 2019. Any further extension must be approved by the DOE. Final 

approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive 

agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. 

See Note 8 to the financial statements under “Long-term Debt – DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings” for additional information, including 

applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle 

Units 3 and 4), and conditions to borrowing.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

53

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Income Tax Matters

Federal Tax Reform Legislation
In December 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, 
among other things, reduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retained normalization provisions for public utility property and 
existing renewable energy incentives, and repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax. In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, 
NOLs generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with 
utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of the consolidated income tax liability 
resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards.

Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – “Income Tax Accounting 
Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment 
date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the 
enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, Southern Company considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements 
as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation “provisional” as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing its 2017 tax return 
in the fourth quarter 2018. Southern Company recognized tax benefits of $30 million and $264 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively, 
for a total net tax benefit of $294 million as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, in total, Southern Company recorded a 
$417 million decrease in regulatory assets and a $6.2 billion increase in regulatory liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and 
$16 million of stranded excess deferred tax balances in AOCI at December 31, 2017 were adjusted through retained earnings in 2018. As of 
December 31, 2018, Southern Company considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax 
assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.

However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each state’s adoption 
of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of 
the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and each state’s regulatory commission. The ultimate impact of these 
matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the traditional 
electric operating companies’ and the natural gas distribution utilities’ rate filings, including amounts returned to customers during 2018, 
to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – “Credit Rating Risk” herein and 

Note 10 to the financial statements under “Current and Deferred Income Taxes” for additional information.

Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 

remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus 

depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional 

estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $300 million for the 2018 tax year and approximately 

$130 million for the 2019 tax year. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

Tax Credits
The Tax Reform Legislation retained the renewable energy incentives that were included in the PATH Act. The PATH Act allows for 30% ITC 

for solar projects that commence construction by December 31, 2019; 26% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2020; 

22% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2021; and a permanent 10% ITC for solar projects that commence construction 

on or after January 1, 2022. In addition, the PATH Act allows for 100% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2016; 

80% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2017; 60% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2018 and 

40% PTC for wind projects that commence construction in 2019. Wind projects commencing construction after 2019 will not be entitled to 

any PTCs. Southern Company has received ITCs and PTCs in connection with investments in solar, wind, and biomass facilities primarily at 

Southern Power and Georgia Power. See Note 1 to the financial statements under “Income Taxes” and Note 10 to the financial statements 

under “Current and Deferred Income Taxes – Tax Credit Carryforwards” for additional information regarding the utilization and amortization 

of credits and the tax benefit related to basis differences.

Other Matters
Southern Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future 

earnings. In addition, Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course 

of business. The business activities of Southern Company’s subsidiaries are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public 

health and the environment, such as laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Litigation 

54

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen 

enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages 

alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive 

relief in connection with such matters.

The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current 

proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the 

ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Southern Company’s financial statements. 

See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being 

litigated which may affect future earnings potential.

Litigation
In January 2017, a putative securities class action complaint was filed against Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former 

Mississippi Power officers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, by Monroe County Employees’ 

Retirement System on behalf of all persons who purchased shares of Southern Company’s common stock between April 25, 2012 and 

October 29, 2013. The complaint alleges that Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers 

made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility in violation of certain provisions under the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The complaint seeks, among other things, compensatory damages and litigation costs and 

attorneys’ fees. In June 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that provided additional detail about their claims, increased the 

purported class period by one day, and added certain other former Mississippi Power officers as defendants. In July 2017, the defendants 

filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint with prejudice, to which the plaintiffs filed an opposition in September 2017. 

On March 29, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, issued an order granting, in part, the 

defendants’ motion to dismiss. The court dismissed certain claims against certain officers of Southern Company and Mississippi Power and 

dismissed the allegations related to a number of the statements that plaintiffs challenged as being false or misleading. On April 26, 2018, 

the defendants filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s order, seeking dismissal of the remaining claims in the lawsuit. On 

August 10, 2018, the court denied the motion for reconsideration and denied a motion to certify the issue for interlocutory appeal.

In February 2017, Jean Vineyard filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit and, in May 2017, Judy Mesirov filed a shareholder derivative 

lawsuit, each in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Each of these lawsuits names as defendants Southern Company, 

certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. In August 2017, these two shareholder 

derivative lawsuits were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The complaints allege that the 

defendants caused Southern Company to make false or misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility cost and 

schedule. Further, the complaints allege that the defendants were unjustly enriched and caused the waste of corporate assets and also 

allege that the individual defendants violated their fiduciary duties. Each plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, 

unspecified actual damages and, on each plaintiff’s own behalf, attorneys’ fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. Each plaintiff also seeks 

certain changes to Southern Company’s corporate governance and internal processes. On April 25, 2018, the court entered an order staying 

this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities 

class action.

In May 2017, Helen E. Piper Survivor’s Trust filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, State of 

Georgia that names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power 

officers. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants, among other things, breached their fiduciary duties in connection with 

schedule delays and cost overruns associated with the construction of the Kemper County energy facility. The complaint further alleges 

that the individual defendants authorized or failed to correct false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility 

schedule and cost and failed to implement necessary internal controls to prevent harm to Southern Company. The plaintiff seeks to recover, 

on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and disgorgement of profits and, on its behalf, attorneys’ fees and costs 

in bringing the lawsuit. The plaintiff also seeks certain unspecified changes to Southern Company’s corporate governance and internal 

processes. On May 4, 2018, the court entered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or 

any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities class action.

On May 18, 2018, Southern Company and Mississippi Power received a notice of dispute and arbitration demand filed by Martin Product 

Sales, LLC (Martin) based on two agreements, both related to Kemper IGCC byproducts for which Mississippi Power provided termination 

notices in September 2017. Martin alleges breach of contract, breach of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and misrepresentation, and 

civil conspiracy and makes a claim for damages in the amount of approximately $143 million, as well as additional unspecified damages, 

attorney’s fees, costs, and interest. In the first quarter 2019, Mississippi Power and Southern Company filed motions to dismiss.

55

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Southern Company believes these legal challenges have no merit; however, an adverse outcome in any of these proceedings could have an 

impact on Southern Company’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Southern Company will vigorously defend itself in 

these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.

Investments in Leveraged Leases
A subsidiary of Southern Holdings has several leveraged lease agreements, with original terms ranging up to 45 years, which relate to 

international and domestic energy generation, distribution, and transportation assets. Southern Company receives federal income tax 

deductions for depreciation and amortization, as well as interest on long-term debt related to these investments. Southern Company 

reviews all important lease assumptions at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that a 

change in assumptions has occurred or may occur. These assumptions include the effective tax rate, the residual value, the credit 

quality of the lessees, and the timing of expected tax cash flows. See Note 1 to the financial statements under “Leveraged Leases” for 

additional information.

The ability of the lessees to make required payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary is dependent on the operational performance 

of the assets. In 2017, the financial and operational performance of one of the lessees and the associated generation assets raised 

significant concerns about the short-term ability of the generation assets to produce cash flows sufficient to support ongoing operations 

and the lessee’s contractual obligations and its ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments to the Southern Holdings 

subsidiary beginning in June 2018. As a result of operational improvements in 2018, the 2018 lease payments were paid in full. However, 

operational issues and the resulting cash liquidity challenges persist and significant concerns continue regarding the lessee’s ability to 

make the remaining semi-annual lease payments. These operational challenges may also impact the expected residual value of the assets 

at the end of the lease term in 2047. If any future lease payment is not paid in full, the Southern Holdings subsidiary may be unable to 

make its corresponding payment to the holders of the underlying non-recourse debt related to the generation assets. Failure to make 

the required payment to the debtholders could represent an event of default that would give the debtholders the right to foreclose on, 

and take ownership of, the generation assets from the Southern Holdings subsidiary, in effect terminating the lease and resulting in the 

write-off of the related lease receivable, which would result in a reduction in net income of approximately $86 million after tax based on 

the lease receivable balance at December 31, 2018. Southern Company has evaluated the recoverability of the lease receivable and the 

expected residual value of the generation assets at the end of the lease under various scenarios and has concluded that its investment in 

the leveraged lease is not impaired at December 31, 2018. Southern Company will continue to monitor the operational performance of 

the underlying assets and evaluate the ability of the lessee to continue to make the required lease payments. The ultimate outcome of this 

matter cannot be determined at this time.

Mississippi Power
In conjunction with Southern Company’s sale of Gulf Power, Mississippi Power and Gulf Power have committed to seek a restructuring of 

their 50% undivided ownership interests in Plant Daniel such that each of them would, after the restructuring, own 100% of a generating 

unit. On January 15, 2019, Gulf Power provided notice to Mississippi Power that Gulf Power will retire its share of the generating 

capacity of Plant Daniel on January 15, 2024. Mississippi Power has the option to purchase Gulf Power’s ownership interest for $1 on 

January 15, 2024, provided that Mississippi Power exercises the option no later than 120 days prior to that date. Mississippi Power is 

assessing the potential operational and economic effects of Gulf Power’s notice. The ultimate outcome of these matters remains subject to 

completion of Mississippi Power’s evaluations and applicable regulatory approvals, including the FERC and the Mississippi PSC, and cannot 

now be determined. See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” for information regarding the 

sale of Gulf Power.

Southern Power
On January 29, 2019, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) filed petitions to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. 

Southern Power, together with its noncontrolling partners, owns four solar facilities where PG&E is the energy off-taker for approximately 

207 MWs of capacity under long-term PPAs. PG&E is also the transmission provider for these facilities and two of Southern Power’s other 

solar facilities. Southern Power has evaluated the recoverability of its investments in these solar facilities under various scenarios, including 

selling the related energy into the competitive markets, and has concluded they are not impaired. At December 31, 2018, Southern 

Power had outstanding accounts receivables due from PG&E of $1 million related to the PPAs and $36 million related to the transmission 

interconnections. Southern Company does not expect a material impact to its financial statements if, as a result of the bankruptcy 

proceedings, PG&E does not perform in accordance with the PPAs or the terms of the PPAs are renegotiated; however, the ultimate 

outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

56

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Southern Company Gas
A wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas owns and operates a natural gas storage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns 

in Louisiana. Periodic integrity tests are required in accordance with rules of the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR). In 

August 2017, in connection with an ongoing integrity project, updated seismic mapping indicated the proximity of one of the caverns to 

the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. 

At December 31, 2018, the facility’s property, plant, and equipment had a net book value of $109 million, of which the cavern itself 

represents approximately 20%. A potential early retirement of this cavern is dependent upon several factors including compliance with an 

order from the Louisiana DNR detailing the requirements to place the cavern back in service, which includes, among other things, obtaining 

core samples to determine the composition of the sheath surrounding the edge of the salt dome.

The cavern continues to maintain its pressures and overall structural integrity. Southern Company Gas intends to monitor the cavern 

and comply with the Louisiana DNR order through 2020 and place the cavern back in service in 2021. These events were considered in 

connection with Southern Company Gas’ annual long-lived asset impairment analysis, which determined there was no impairment as of 

December 31, 2018. Any changes in results of monitoring activities, rates at which expiring capacity contracts are re-contracted, timing of 

placing the cavern back in service, or Louisiana DNR requirements could trigger impairment. Further, early retirement of the cavern could 

trigger impairment of other long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot 

be determined at this time, but could have a significant impact on Southern Company’s financial statements.

ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Southern Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described 

in Notes 1, 5, and 6 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material 

impact on Southern Company’s results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce 

estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed 

the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company’s Board of Directors.

Utility Regulation
Southern Company’s traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities, which collectively comprised 

approximately 85% of Southern Company’s total operating revenues for 2018, are subject to retail regulation by their respective state PSCs 

or other applicable state regulatory agencies and wholesale regulation by the FERC. These regulatory agencies set the rates the traditional 

electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities are permitted to charge customers based on allowable costs, including 

a reasonable ROE. As a result, the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities apply accounting 

standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators 

may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. 

This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery 

through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the 

accounting standards has a further effect on Southern Company’s financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used 

in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by the traditional electric operating companies and the 

natural gas distribution utilities; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation, AROs, and pension and 

other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on Southern Company’s results of operations and financial condition than they 

would on a non-regulated company. See Note 15 to the financial statements for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power and three of 

Southern Company Gas’ natural gas distribution utilities.

As reflected in Note 2 to the financial statements under “Southern Company – Regulatory Assets and Liabilities,” significant regulatory 

assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement 

to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory 

actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact Southern Company’s 

financial statements.

Estimated Cost, Schedule, and Rate Recovery for the Construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, which resolved certain prudency matters in connection with 

Georgia Power’s fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power’s seventeenth VCM report, which 

included a recommendation to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and 

Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, as well as a modification of the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Georgia 
PSC’s related order stated that under the modified Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through 

57

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

December 31, 2015 should be disallowed as imprudent; (ii) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable 

and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs; (iii) Georgia Power would have the burden of proof to show 

that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent; (iv) Georgia Power’s total project capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (net of 

$1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds) was found 

reasonable and did not represent a cost cap; and (v) prudence decisions would be made subsequent to achieving fuel load for Unit 4.

In its order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power’s seventeenth VCM report 

are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.

In the second quarter 2018, Georgia Power revised its base cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and 

start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to $8.0 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast of $8.4 billion 

(net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). 

Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC’s 

order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost 

cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for the $0.7 billion increase in costs included in the current base capital cost forecast in the 

nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently 

included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital 

cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in 

the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by 

management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to 

income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018.

Georgia Power’s revised cost estimate reflects an expected in-service date of November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4.

As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or 

cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any required engineering changes, 

of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation 

in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly 

construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. 

To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be 

retained and deployed.

Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity 

to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of 

commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, 

was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does 

not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected 

in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate 

impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the 

results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.

There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state 

level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified 

in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern 

Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests 

have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the 

timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require 

other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there 

may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. Any extension of the in-service dates of November 2021 for 

Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4 is currently estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per 

month, based on Georgia Power’s ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not 

precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek 

recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required 

to be charged to income and such charges could be material.

58

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Given the significant complexity involved in estimating the future costs to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 

4 and the significant management judgment necessary to assess the related uncertainties surrounding future rate recovery of any projected 

cost increases, as well as the potential impact on Southern Company’s results of operations and cash flows, Southern Company considers 

these items to be critical accounting estimates. See Note 2 to the financial statements under “Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction” for 

additional information.

Accounting for Income Taxes
The consolidated income tax provision and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as any unrecognized tax benefits and 

valuation allowances, require significant judgment and estimates. These estimates are supported by historical tax return data, reasonable 

projections of taxable income, and interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations across multiple taxing jurisdictions. The 

effective tax rate reflects the statutory tax rates and calculated apportionments for the various states in which the Southern Company 

system operates.

Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various state income tax returns, some of which are combined 

or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary’s current and deferred tax 

expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate 

income tax return. Certain deductions and credits can be limited at the consolidated or combined level resulting in NOL and tax credit 

carryforwards that would not otherwise result on a stand-alone basis. Utilization of NOL and tax credit carryforwards and the assessment 

of valuation allowances are based on significant judgment and extensive analysis of Southern Company’s current financial position and 

result of operations, including currently available information about future years, to estimate when future taxable income will be realized.

Current and deferred state income tax liabilities and assets are estimated based on laws of multiple states that determine the income to 

be apportioned to their jurisdictions. States utilize various formulas to calculate the apportionment of taxable income, primarily using 

sales, assets, or payroll within the jurisdiction compared to the consolidated totals. In addition, each state varies as to whether a stand-

alone, combined, or unitary filing methodology is required. The calculation of deferred state taxes considers apportionment factors and 

filing methodologies that are expected to apply in future years. The apportionments and methodologies which are ultimately finalized in a 

manner inconsistent with expectations could have a material effect on Southern Company’s financial statements.

Given the significant judgment involved in estimating NOL and tax credit carryforwards and multi-state apportionments for all 

subsidiaries, Southern Company considers federal and state deferred income tax liabilities and assets to be critical accounting estimates.

Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated costs for an asset’s future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the 

liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset’s useful life. 

In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays 

associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future 

cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.

The liability for AROs primarily relates to facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule and the related state rules, principally ash ponds, and 

the decommissioning of the Southern Company system’s nuclear facilities – Alabama Power’s Plant Farley and Georgia Power’s ownership 

interests in Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. In addition, the Southern Company system has AROs related to various landfill 

sites, asbestos removal, mine reclamation, land restoration related to solar and wind facilities, and disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in 

certain transformers.

The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas also have identified retirement obligations, such as obligations 

related to certain electric transmission and distribution facilities, certain asbestos containing material within long-term assets not subject 

to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, certain wireless communication towers, the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain 

transformers, leasehold improvements, equipment on customer property, and property associated with the Southern Company system’s 

rail lines and natural gas pipelines. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded as the fair value of the 

retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these retirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient 

information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the retirement obligation.

The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and 

post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule. 

During 2018, Alabama Power and Georgia Power recorded increases of approximately $1.2 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively, to their 

AROs related to the disposal of CCR and increases of approximately $300 million and $130 million, respectively, to their AROs related to 

updated nuclear decommissioning cost site studies. Alabama Power’s CCR-related update resulted from feasibility studies performed on 
ash ponds in use at the plants it operates, which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash 

59

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-

place methodology. Georgia Power’s CCR-related update resulted from a strategic assessment which indicated additional closure costs 

will be required to close its ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and 

additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. The traditional electric operating companies expect 

to periodically update their ARO cost estimates. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – “Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and 

Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals” herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.

Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, Southern Company considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical 

accounting estimates.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Southern Company’s calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These 

assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary 

and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include interest and service 

cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized 

costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, 

therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While Southern Company believes that the 

assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other 

postretirement benefit costs and obligations.

Key elements in determining Southern Company’s pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on 

plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. 

The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on Southern Company’s investment 

strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. Southern Company 

determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to Southern 

Company’s target asset allocation. For purposes of determining its liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, 

Southern Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate for each plan developed from the weighted 

average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments.

The following table illustrates the sensitivity to changes in Southern Company’s long-term assumptions with respect to the discount rate, 

salary increases, and the long-term rate of return on plan assets:

Change in Assumption

Increase/(Decrease) 
in Total Benefit 
Expense for 2019

Increase/(Decrease) in 
Projected Obligation 
for Pension Plan at 
December 31, 2018

Increase/(Decrease) in 
Projected Obligation for 
Other Postretirement 
Benefit Plans at 
December 31, 2018

25 basis point change in discount rate
25 basis point change in salaries
25 basis point change in long-term return on plan assets

$37/$(36)
$11/$(11)
$33/$(33)

(in millions)

$434/$(411)
$105/$(101)
N/A

$50/$(48)
$–/$–
N/A

N/A – Not applicable

See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The acquisition method of accounting requires the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be recorded at the date of acquisition at 
their respective estimated fair values. Southern Company recognizes goodwill as of the acquisition date, as a residual over the fair values 
of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of the year as well 
as on an interim basis as events and changes in circumstances occur. Primarily as a result of the acquisitions of Southern Company Gas 
and PowerSecure in 2016, goodwill totaled approximately $5.3 billion at December 31, 2018. As a result of the Southern Company Gas 
Dispositions, goodwill was reduced by $910 million during 2018. In addition, Southern Company Gas recorded a $42 million goodwill 
impairment charge in 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions.

Definite-lived intangible assets acquired are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets to reflect the pattern 
in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed. Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the 
carrying amount of the intangible assets may not be recoverable, the intangible assets will be reviewed for impairment. Primarily as a 
result of the acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure and PPA fair value adjustments resulting from Southern Power’s 
acquisitions, other intangible assets, net of amortization totaled approximately $613 million at December 31, 2018.

60

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as 
asset lives, can significantly impact Southern Company’s results of operations. Fair values and useful lives are determined based on, among 
other factors, the expected future period of benefit of the asset, the various characteristics of the asset, and projected cash flows. As the 
determination of an asset’s fair value and useful life involves management making certain estimates and because these estimates form the 
basis for the determination of whether or not an impairment charge should be recorded, Southern Company considers these estimates to 
be critical accounting estimates.

See Note 1 to the financial statements under “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities” for additional information regarding 
Southern Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets and Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information related to 

Southern Company’s 2016 acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure, as well as the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.

Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair value, unless the transactions 
qualify for the normal purchases or normal sales scope exception and are instead subject to traditional accrual accounting. For those 
transactions that do not qualify as a normal purchase or normal sale, changes in the derivatives’ fair values are recognized concurrently in 
earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. If the derivatives meet those criteria, derivative gains and losses offset related 
results of the hedged item in the income statement in the case of a fair value hedge, or gains and losses are deferred in OCI until the 
hedged transaction affects earnings in the case of a cash flow hedge. Certain subsidiaries of Southern Company enter into energy-related 
derivatives that are designated as regulatory hedges where gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets and 
then are included in fuel expense as the underlying fuel is used in operations and ultimately recovered through billings to customers.

Southern Company uses derivative instruments to reduce the impact to the results of operations due to the risk of changes in the price 
of natural gas, to manage fuel hedging programs per guidelines of state regulatory agencies, and to mitigate residual changes in the price 
of electricity, weather, interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates. The fair value of commodity derivative instruments used to 
manage exposure to changing prices reflects the estimated amounts that Southern Company would receive or pay to terminate or close 
the contracts at the reporting date. To determine the fair value of the derivative instruments, Southern Company utilizes market data or 
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the derivative asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks 

inherent in the inputs of the valuation technique.

Southern Company classifies derivative assets and liabilities based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value 

measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the 

valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy. The determination of the fair value of the 

derivative instruments incorporates various required factors. These factors include:

 O the creditworthiness of the counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements (such as cash deposits and letters of credit);

 O events specific to a given counterparty; and

 O the impact of Southern Company’s nonperformance risk on its liabilities.

Given the assumptions used in pricing the derivative asset or liability, Southern Company considers the valuation of derivative assets 

and liabilities a critical accounting estimate. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – “Market Price Risk” herein and Note 14 to the 

financial statements for more information.

Contingent Obligations
Southern Company is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations as well as other factors and conditions that subject it 

to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for 

more information regarding certain of these contingencies. Southern Company periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records 

reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can 

be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could 

materially affect Southern Company’s results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the financial statements under “Recently Adopted Accounting Standards” for additional information.

In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance 

sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation 

of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would 

represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged and there is no change to the accounting for existing leveraged 
leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and Southern Company adopted the new standard 
effective January 1, 2019.

61

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Southern Company elected the transition methodology provided by ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, whereby 
the requirements of ASU 2016-02 are applied on a prospective basis as of the adoption date of January 1, 2019, without restating prior 

periods. Southern Company elected the package of practical expedients provided by ASU 2016-02 that allows prior determinations of 

whether existing contracts are, or contain, leases and the classification of existing leases to continue without reassessment. Additionally, 

Southern Company applied the use-of-hindsight practical expedient in determining lease terms as of the date of adoption and elected the 

practical expedient that allows existing land easements not previously accounted for as leases not to be reassessed. Southern Company 

also made accounting policy elections to account for short-term leases in all asset classes as off-balance sheet leases and combined lease 

and non-lease components in the computations of lease obligations and right-of-use assets for most asset classes.

The Southern Company system completed the implementation of a new application to track and account for its leases and updated 

its internal controls and accounting policies to support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. The Southern Company system 

completed its lease inventory and determined its most significant leases involve PPAs, real estate, and communication towers where certain 

of Southern Company’s subsidiaries are the lessee and PPAs where certain of Southern Company’s subsidiaries are the lessor. In the first 

quarter 2019, the adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in recording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on Southern Company’s balance 

sheet each totaling approximately $2.0 billion, with no impact on Southern Company’s statement of income.

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

Overview
Earnings in all periods presented were negatively affected by charges associated with plants under construction; however, Southern 

Company’s financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2018.

The Southern Company system’s cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital 

expenditures, and debt maturities. The Southern Company system’s capital expenditures and other investing activities include investments 

to meet projected long-term demand requirements, including to build new electric generation facilities, to maintain existing electric 

generation facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to certain existing electric 

generating units and closures of ash ponds, to expand and improve electric transmission and distribution facilities, to update and expand 

natural gas distribution systems, and for restoration following major storms. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of the 

Southern Company system’s cash needs. For the three-year period from 2019 through 2021, Southern Company’s projected common stock 

dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. Southern Company plans to finance 

future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily by accessing borrowings from financial institutions and through debt and 

equity issuances in the capital markets. Southern Company intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital 

markets as well as bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See “Sources of Capital,” “Financing Activities,” and 

“Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations” herein for additional information.

Southern Company’s investments in the qualified pension plans and the nuclear decommissioning trust funds decreased in value at 

December 31, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended 

December 31, 2018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plans are anticipated during 2019. See “Contractual 

Obligations” herein and Notes 6 and 11 to the financial statements under “Nuclear Decommissioning” and “Pension Plans,” respectively, for 
additional information.

Net cash provided from operating activities in 2018 totaled $6.9 billion, an increase of $0.6 billion from 2017. The increase in net cash 

provided from operating activities was primarily due to the timing of vendor payments and increased fuel cost recovery. Net cash provided 

from operating activities in 2017 totaled $6.4 billion, an increase of $1.5 billion from 2016. Significant changes in operating cash flow for 

2017 as compared to 2016 included increases of $1.2 billion related to operating activities of Southern Company Gas, which was acquired 

on July 1, 2016, and $1.0 billion related to voluntary contributions to the qualified pension plan in 2016, partially offset by the timing of 

vendor payments.

Net cash used for investing activities in 2018, 2017, and 2016 totaled $5.8 billion, $7.2 billion, and $20.0 billion, respectively. The cash 

used for investing activities in 2018 was primarily due to the traditional electric operating companies’ installation of equipment to comply 

with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and capital expenditures for 

Southern Company Gas’ infrastructure replacement programs, partially offset by proceeds from the sale transactions described in Note 15 

to the financial statements. The cash used for investing activities in 2017 was primarily due to the traditional electric operating companies’ 

installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution 

facilities, capital expenditures for Southern Company Gas’ infrastructure replacement programs, and Southern Power’s renewable 

acquisitions. The cash used for investing activities in 2016 was primarily due to the closing of the Merger, the acquisition of PowerSecure, 

62

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Southern Company Gas’ investment in SNG, the traditional electric operating companies’ construction of electric generation, transmission, 

and distribution facilities and installation of equipment at electric generating facilities to comply with environmental standards, and 

Southern Power’s acquisitions and construction of renewable facilities and a natural gas facility.

Net cash used for financing activities totaled $1.8 billion in 2018 primarily due to net redemptions and repurchases of long-term debt, 

common stock dividend payments, and a decrease in commercial paper borrowings, partially offset by net issuances of short-term bank 

debt, proceeds from Southern Power’s sales of non-controlling equity interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar 

facilities and eight of its wind facilities, and the issuance of common stock. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $1.0 billion 

in 2017 primarily due to net issuances of long-term and short-term debt, partially offset by common stock dividend payments. Net cash 

provided from financing activities totaled $15.7 billion in 2016 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and common stock associated 

with completing the Merger and funding the subsidiaries’ continuous construction programs, Southern Power’s acquisitions, and Southern 

Company Gas’ investment in SNG, partially offset by redemptions of long-term debt and common stock dividend payments. Fluctuations 

in cash flow from financing activities vary from year to year based on capital needs and the maturity or redemption of securities.

Significant balance sheet changes in 2018 included the reclassification of $5.7 billion and $3.3 billion in total assets and liabilities held for 

sale, respectively, primarily associated with Gulf Power, as well as decreases of $3.0 billion and $0.4 billion in total assets and liabilities, 

respectively, associated with the sales described in Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Power” and “Southern Company 

Gas.” Also see Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” and “Assets Held for Sale” for additional 

information. After adjusting for these changes, other significant balance sheet changes included an increase of $7.1 billion in total property, 

plant, and equipment primarily related to the $4.7 billion increase in AROs at Alabama Power and Georgia Power, as well as the traditional 

electric operating companies’ installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, 

transmission, and distribution facilities and Southern Company Gas’ capital expenditures for infrastructure replacement programs, partially 

offset by the second quarter 2018 charge related to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4; a decrease of $3.1 billion in long-term 

debt (including amounts due within one year) resulting from the repayment of long-term debt; an increase of $3.0 billion in noncontrolling 

interests at Southern Power as a result of sales of interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of 

its wind facilities; and an increase of $1.9 billion in other regulatory assets, deferred primarily related to AROs at Georgia Power. See Notes 

2 and 15 to the financial statements under “Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction” and “Southern Power – Sales of Renewable Facility 

Interests,” respectively, as well as Notes 6 and 8 to the financial statements and “Financing Activities” herein for additional information.

At the end of 2018, the market price of Southern Company’s common stock was $43.92 per share (based on the closing price as reported 

on the NYSE) and the book value was $23.91 per share, representing a market-to-book value ratio of 184%, compared to $48.09, $23.99, 

and 201%, respectively, at the end of 2017.

Southern Company’s consolidated ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 32.5% and 31.5% at 

December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.

Sources of Capital
Southern Company intends to meet its future capital needs through operating cash flows, borrowings from financial institutions, and debt 

and equity issuances in the capital markets. Equity capital can be provided from any combination of Southern Company’s stock plans, 

private placements, or public offerings. The amount and timing of additional equity and debt issuances in 2019, as well as in subsequent 

years, will be contingent on Southern Company’s investment opportunities and the Southern Company system’s capital requirements 

and will depend upon prevailing market conditions and other factors. See “Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations” herein for 

additional information.

Except as described herein, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas plan to obtain the 

funds required for construction and other purposes from operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial 

institutions, and equity contributions or loans from Southern Company. Southern Power also plans to utilize tax equity partnership 

contributions, as well as funds resulting from its pending sale of Plant Mankato. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future 

financings, if needed, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors. See Note 15 to the financial 

statements under “Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants” herein for additional information.

In addition, in 2014, Georgia Power entered into the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the DOE, under which the proceeds of borrowings 

may be used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs incurred in connection with its construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 

4. Under the Loan Guarantee Agreement, the DOE agreed to guarantee borrowings of up to $3.46 billion (not to exceed 70% of Eligible 

Project Costs) to be made by Georgia Power under a multi-advance credit facility (FFB Credit Facility) among Georgia Power, the DOE, and 

the FFB. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion under the FFB Credit Facility. In July 2017, Georgia Power entered 

into an amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement, which provides that further advances are conditioned upon the DOE’s approval of 
any agreements entered into in replacement of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement and satisfaction of certain other conditions.

63

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion of additional 

guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expires on March 31, 2019, subject to any further 

extension approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are 

subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, 

and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 8 to the financial statements under “Long-term Debt – DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings” for 

additional information regarding the Loan Guarantee Agreement, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment 

events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4), and additional conditions to borrowing. Also see 

Note 2 to the financial statements under “Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction” for additional information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 

and 4.

The issuance of securities by the traditional electric operating companies and Nicor Gas is generally subject to the approval of the 

applicable state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency. The issuance of all securities by Mississippi Power and short-term 

securities by Georgia Power is generally subject to regulatory approval by the FERC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of 

securities, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries file registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as 

amended (1933 Act). The amounts of securities authorized by the appropriate regulatory authorities, as well as the securities registered 

under the 1933 Act, are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in the capital markets.

Southern Company, each traditional electric operating company, and Southern Power generally obtain financing separately without credit 

support from any affiliate. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of each 

company are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.

In addition, Southern Company Gas Capital obtains external financing for Southern Company Gas and its subsidiaries, other than Nicor Gas, 

which obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliates. Nicor Gas’ commercial paper program supports its working 

capital needs as Nicor Gas is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. All of the other Southern Company Gas subsidiaries 

benefit from Southern Company Gas Capital’s commercial paper program.

See Note 8 to the financial statements under “Bank Credit Arrangements” for additional information.

At December 31, 2018, Southern Company’s current liabilities exceeded current assets by $4.7 billion, primarily due to $3.2 billion of 

long-term debt that is due within one year (including approximately $1.3 billion at the parent company, $0.2 billion at Alabama Power, 

$0.6 billion at Georgia Power, $0.6 billion at Southern Power, and $0.4 billion at Southern Company Gas) and $2.9 billion of notes payable 

(including approximately $1.8 billion at the parent company, $0.3 billion at Georgia Power, $0.1 billion at Southern Power, and $0.7 billion 

at Southern Company Gas). Subsequent to December 31, 2018, using proceeds from the sale of Gulf Power, the Southern Company 

parent entity repaid $0.7 billion of its long-term debt due within one year and all $1.8 billion of its notes payable at December 31, 2018. 

See “Financing Activities” herein for additional information. To meet short-term cash needs and contingencies, the Southern Company 

system has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to capital markets and financial institutions. Southern Company, the 

traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas intend to utilize operating cash flows, as well as 

commercial paper, lines of credit, bank notes, and securities issuances, as market conditions permit, as well as, under certain circumstances 

for the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas, equity contributions and/or loans from 

Southern Company to meet their short-term capital needs.

At December 31, 2018, Southern Company and its subsidiaries had approximately $1.4 billion of cash and cash equivalents. Committed 

credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2018 were as follows:

Company

2019

2020

2022

Total

Unused(d)

Expires

Southern Company(a)
Alabama Power
Georgia Power
Mississippi Power
Southern Power(b)
Southern Company Gas(c)
Other
Southern Company Consolidated(e)

(a)  Represents the Southern Company parent entity.

64

$ — $ — $2,000
500
800
1,750
—
—
—
750
—
1,900
—
—
—
$7,200
$500

33
—
100
—
—
30
$163

$2,000
1,333
1,750
100
750
1,900
30
$7,863

(in millions)

$1,999
1,333
1,736
100
727
1,895
30
$7,820

Executable 
Term Loans

Expires Within  
One Year

One 
Year

Two 
Years

Term  
Out

No Term  
Out

$—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$—

$—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$—

$—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$—

$ —
33
—
100
—
—
30
$163

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

(b)  Does not include Southern Power Company’s $120 million continuing letter of credit facility for standby letters of credit expiring in 2021, of which 

$17 million was unused at December 31, 2018. Southern Power’s subsidiaries are not parties to its bank credit arrangement.

(c)  Southern Company Gas, as the parent entity, guarantees the obligations of Southern Company Gas Capital, which is the borrower of $1.4 billion of this 

arrangement. Southern Company Gas’ committed credit arrangement also includes $500 million for which Nicor Gas is the borrower and which is restricted 
for working capital needs of Nicor Gas. Pursuant to this multi-year credit arrangement, the allocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor 
Gas may be adjusted.

(d)  Amounts used are for letters of credit.
(e)  Excludes $280 million of committed credit arrangements of Gulf Power, which was sold on January 1, 2019. See Note 15 to the financial statements under 

“Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” for additional information.

See Note 8 to the financial statements under “Bank Credit Arrangements” for additional information.

Most of these bank credit arrangements, as well as the term loan arrangements of Alabama Power and Southern Power Company, contain 

covenants that limit debt levels and contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions to other indebtedness (including guarantee 

obligations) that are restricted only to the indebtedness of the individual company. Such cross-default provisions to other indebtedness 

would trigger an event of default if the applicable borrower defaulted on indebtedness or guarantee obligations over a specified threshold. 

Such cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the applicable borrower defaulted on 

indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company, the traditional electric operating 

companies, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas were in compliance with all such covenants. None of the 

bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowings.

Subject to applicable market conditions, Southern Company and its subsidiaries expect to renew or replace their bank credit arrangements 

as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Southern Company and its subsidiaries may extend the maturity dates and/or 

increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.

A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the revenue bonds of the traditional electric 

operating companies and the commercial paper programs of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern 

Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. The amount of variable rate revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating 

companies outstanding requiring liquidity support at December 31, 2018 was approximately $1.6 billion, which included $82 million 

related to Gulf Power. In addition, at December 31, 2018, the traditional electric operating companies had approximately $403 million 

of revenue bonds outstanding that are required to be remarketed within the next 12 months, which included $58 million related to Gulf 

Power. See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” for information regarding the sale of Gulf 

Power on January 1, 2019. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $108 million of obligations related 

to outstanding variable rate pollution control revenue bonds.

Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, Nicor Gas, and SEGCO make short-

term borrowings primarily through commercial paper programs that have the liquidity support of the committed bank credit arrangements 

described above. Short-term borrowings are included in notes payable in the balance sheets.

Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:

Short-term Debt at the End  
of the Period

Short-term Debt During  
the Period(*)

Amount 
Outstanding

(in millions)

Weighted 
Average 
Interest Rate

Average  
Amount 
Outstanding

(in millions)

Weighted 
Average 
Interest Rate

Maximum 
Amount 
Outstanding

(in millions)

December 31, 2018:
Commercial paper
Short-term bank debt

Total
December 31, 2017:
Commercial paper
Short-term bank debt

Total
December 31, 2016:
Commercial paper
Short-term bank debt

Total

$1,064
1,851
$2,915

$1,832
607
$2,439

$1,909
123
$2,032

3.0%
3.1%
3.1%

1.8%
2.3%
1.9%

1.1%
1.7%
1.1%

$ 1,655
1,722
$ 3,377

$ 2,117
555
$ 2,672

$ 976
176
$ 1,152

2.3%
2.9%
2.6%

1.3%
2.1%
1.5%

0.8%
1.7%
1.1%

(*)  Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.

$3,042
2,504

$2,946
1,020

$1,970
500

65

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

In addition to the short-term borrowings of Southern Power Company included in the table above, at December 31, 2016, Southern Power 

Company subsidiaries assumed credit agreements (Project Credit Facilities) with the acquisition of certain solar facilities, which were non-

recourse to Southern Power Company, the proceeds of which were used to finance project costs related to such solar facilities. The Project 

Credit Facilities were fully repaid in January 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Project Credit Facilities had a maximum 

amount outstanding of $828 million and an average amount outstanding of $566 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% and 

had total amounts outstanding of $209 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% at December 31, 2016.

Southern Company believes the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs, lines of credit, 

bank term loans, and operating cash flows.

Financing Activities
During 2018, Southern Company issued approximately 11.6 million shares of common stock primarily through employee equity 

compensation plans and received proceeds of approximately $442 million.

In addition, during the third and fourth quarters 2018, Southern Company issued a total of approximately 12.1 million and 2.5 million 

shares, respectively, of common stock through at-the-market issuances pursuant to sales agency agreements related to Southern 

Company’s continuous equity offering program and received cash proceeds of approximately $540 million and $108 million, respectively, 

net of $5 million and $1 million in commissions, respectively.

The following table outlines the long-term debt financing activities for Southern Company and its subsidiaries for the year ended 

December 31, 2018:

Company

Southern Company(b)
Alabama Power
Georgia Power
Mississippi Power
Southern Power
Southern Company Gas
Other(c)

Elimination(d)

Southern Company Consolidated

Senior 
Note 
Issuances

Senior Note 
Maturities, 
Redemptions, 
and Repurchases

Revenue Bond 
Issuances and 
Reofferings 
of Purchased 
Bonds

Revenue Bond 
Maturities, 
Redemptions, 
 and Repurchases

Other 
Long-Term 
Debt 
Issuances

Other 
Long-Term 
Debt 
Redemptions 
and Maturities(a)

$ 750
500
—
600
—
—
—
—
$ 1,850

$ 1,000
—
1,500
155
350
155
100
—
$ 3,260

(in millions)

$ —
120
108
—
—
—
—
—
$ 228

$ —
120
469
43
—
200
—
—
$ 832

$ —
—
—
—
—
300
100
—
$ 400

$ —
1
111
900
420
—
13
(4)
$ 1,441

(a)  Includes reductions in capital lease obligations resulting from cash payments under capital leases.
(b)  Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(c)  In November 2018, SEGCO, as borrower, and Alabama Power, as guarantor, entered into a $100 million long-term delayed draw floating rate bank term 

loan bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, which SEGCO used to repay at maturity $100 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2013A Senior 
Notes due December 1, 2018. See Note 9 to the financial statements under “Guarantees” for additional information.

(d)  Represents reductions in affiliate capital lease obligations at Georgia Power, which are eliminated in Southern Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of debt issuances for their redemptions 

and maturities shown in the table above, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital. 

The subsidiaries also used the proceeds for their construction programs.

In March 2018, Southern Company entered into a $900 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month 

LIBOR, which was repaid in August 2018.

In April 2018, Southern Company borrowed $250 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, bearing interest 

at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days’ demand by the bank. 

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.

In June 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity two $100 million short-term floating rate bank term loans.

In August 2018, Southern Company issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due 

February 14, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, entered into a $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan bearing 

interest based on one-month LIBOR, and repaid $250 million borrowed in August 2017 pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit 
arrangement. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid the $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan.

66

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

In the third quarter 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity $500 million aggregate principal amount of 1.55% Senior Notes and 

$500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2013A 2.45% Senior Notes.

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, through cash tender offers, Southern Company repurchased and retired approximately $522 million 

of the $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 1.85% Senior Notes due July 1, 2019 (1.85% Notes), approximately 

$180 million of the $350 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2014B 2.15% Senior Notes due September 1, 2019 

(Series 2014B Notes), and approximately $504 million of the $750 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2018A 

Floating Rate Notes due February 14, 2020 (Series 2018A Notes), for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, 

of approximately $1.2 billion. In addition, subsequent to December 31, 2018, and following the completion of the cash tender offers, 

Southern Company completed the redemption of all of the Series 2018A Notes remaining outstanding and called for redemption all of the 

1.85% Notes and Series 2014B Notes remaining outstanding.

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power repaid at maturity $200 million aggregate principal amount of Series Z 5.125% 

Senior Notes.

In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $150 million short-term floating rate bank loan due May 31, 2018.

In May 2018, through cash tender offers, Georgia Power repurchased and retired $89 million of the $250 million aggregate principal 
amount outstanding of its Series 2007A 5.65% Senior Notes due March 1, 2037, $326 million of the $500 million aggregate principal 
amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.95% Senior Notes due February 1, 2039, and $335 million of the $600 million aggregate principal 
amount outstanding of its Series 2010B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2040, for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and 
unpaid interest, of $902 million.

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $13 million, $20 million, and $75 million aggregate principal 
amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle 
Project), First Series 1992, Eighth Series 1994, and Second Series 1995, respectively.

In March 2018, Mississippi Power entered into a $300 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month 
LIBOR, of which $200 million was repaid in the second quarter 2018 and $100 million was repaid in the third quarter 2018. The proceeds 
of this loan, together with the proceeds of Mississippi Power’s $600 million senior notes issuances, were used to repay Mississippi Power’s 
$900 million unsecured floating rate term loan.

In October 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all 334,210 outstanding shares of its preferred stock (as well as related 
depositary shares), with an aggregate par value of approximately $33.4 million.

In May 2018, Southern Power entered into two short-term floating rate bank loans, each for an aggregate principal amount of 
$100 million, which bear interest based on one-month LIBOR. In November 2018, Southern Power repaid one of these short-term loans.

During 2018, Southern Power received approximately $148 million of third-party tax equity related to certain of its renewable facilities. 
See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Power” for additional information.

Prior to its sale, in the second quarter 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings caused $200 million aggregate principal amount of gas facility revenue 
bonds to be redeemed.

In May 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital borrowed $95 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, 
guaranteed by Southern Company Gas, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company Gas Capital and the bank from time 
to time and payable on no less than 30 days’ demand by the bank. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital repaid this loan.

Other long-term debt issuances for Southern Company Gas include the issuance by Nicor Gas of $300 million aggregate principal 
amount of first mortgage bonds in a private placement, of which $100 million was issued in August 2018 and $200 million was issued in 
November 2018.

In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, Southern Company and 
its subsidiaries plan to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with 

lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.

Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2018, Southern Company and its subsidiaries did not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes 
in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.

67

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change of certain 
subsidiaries to BBB and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are for physical electricity and natural gas purchases and sales, fuel purchases, 
fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, transmission, interest rate management, and construction of new 
generation at Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.

The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 2018 were as follows:

Credit Ratings

At BBB and/or Baa2
At BBB- and/or Baa3
At BB+ and/or Ba1(b)

Maximum Potential 
Collateral Requirements(a)

(in millions)

$
30
$ 542
$2,176

(a)  Includes potential collateral requirements related to Gulf Power of $111 million and $221 million at a credit rating of BBB- and/or Baa3 and BB+ and/or 

Ba1, respectively. See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power 
on January 1, 2019.

(b)  Any additional credit rating downgrades at or below BB- and/or Ba3 could increase collateral requirements up to an additional $38 million.

Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade 

could impact the ability of Southern Company and its subsidiaries to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at 

which they do so.

On February 26, 2018, Moody’s revised its rating outlook for Mississippi Power from stable to positive. On August 8, 2018, Moody’s 

upgraded Mississippi Power’s senior unsecured rating to Baa3 from Ba1 and maintained the positive rating outlook.

On February 28, 2018, Fitch removed Mississippi Power from rating watch negative and revised its rating outlook from stable to positive.

Also on February 28, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Southern Company to BBB+ from A- with a 

stable outlook and of Georgia Power to A from A+ with a negative outlook. On August 9, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured 

long-term debt rating of Georgia Power to A- from A.

On March 14, 2018, S&P upgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Mississippi Power to A- from BBB+. The outlook 

remained negative.

On August 8, 2018, Moody’s downgraded the senior unsecured debt rating of Georgia Power to Baa1 from A3.

On September 28, 2018, Moody’s revised its rating outlooks for Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Georgia Power from negative to stable.

Also on September 28, 2018, Fitch assigned a negative rating outlook to the ratings of Southern Company and its subsidiaries (excluding 

Mississippi Power).

As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the 

credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries may be negatively impacted. Southern Company and most of its 
regulated subsidiaries have taken actions to mitigate the resulting impacts, which, among other alternatives, include adjusting capital 

structure. Absent actions by Southern Company and its subsidiaries that fully mitigate the impacts, the credit ratings of Southern Company 

and certain of its subsidiaries could be negatively affected. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information related to 

state PSC or other regulatory agency actions related to the Tax Reform Legislation, including approvals of capital structure adjustments 

for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Atlanta Gas Light by their respective state PSCs, which are expected to help mitigate the potential 

adverse impacts to certain of their credit metrics.

Market Price Risk
The Southern Company system is exposed to market risks, including commodity price risk, interest rate risk, weather risk, and occasionally 

foreign currency exchange rate risk. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the applicable company nets the exposures, 

where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to 

the applicable company’s policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. Southern Company Gas’ wholesale 

gas operations use various contracts in its commercial activities that generally meet the definition of derivatives. For the traditional electric 

operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas’ other businesses, each company’s policy is that derivatives are to be used 

primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored 

using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.

68

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

To mitigate future exposure to a change in interest rates, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries enter into derivatives that have 

been designated as hedges. Derivatives that have been designated as hedges outstanding at December 31, 2018 have a notional amount 

of $2.0 billion and are intended to mitigate interest rate volatility related to existing fixed rate obligations. The weighted average interest 

rate on $5.8 billion of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 2018 was 3.02%. If Southern Company sustained a 100 

basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would affect annualized interest expense 

by approximately $58 million at December 31, 2018. See Note 1 to the financial statements under “Financial Instruments” and Note 14 to 

the financial statements for additional information.

Southern Power Company had foreign currency denominated debt of €1.1 billion at December 31, 2018. Southern Power Company has 

mitigated its exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk through the use of foreign currency swaps converting all interest and principal 

payments to fixed-rate U.S. dollars.

Due to cost-based rate regulation and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the traditional electric operating companies and natural gas 

distribution utilities continue to have limited exposure to market volatility in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity 

fuel prices, and prices of electricity. In addition, Southern Power’s exposure to market volatility in commodity fuel prices and prices of 

electricity is limited because its long-term sales contracts shift substantially all fuel cost responsibility to the purchaser. However, Southern 

Power has been and may continue to be exposed to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices as a result of uncontracted 

generating capacity. To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, the traditional electric operating companies and 

Southern Power may enter into physical fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity 

market and, to a lesser extent, financial hedge contracts for natural gas purchases; however, a significant portion of contracts are priced 

at market. The traditional electric operating companies and certain of the natural gas distribution utilities manage fuel-hedging programs 

implemented per the guidelines of their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies. Southern Company had no 

material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017.

The changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts are substantially attributable to both the volume and the price of natural 

gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, the majority of which are composed 

of regulatory hedges, were as follows:

Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net
Contracts realized or settled
Current period changes(a)
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net(b)(c)

2018

2017

(in millions)

$(163)
93
(131)
$(201)

$ 41
(8)
(196)
$(163)

(a)  Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
(b)  Excludes premium and intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $8 million and $11 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(c)  Includes $6 million of net liabilities related to Gulf Power. See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” for 

information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019.

The net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts were 431 million mmBtu and 621 million mmBtu at December 31, 2018 and 

2017, respectively.

For the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power, the weighted average swap contract cost above market prices was 

approximately $0.12 per mmBtu at December 31, 2018 and $0.15 per mmBtu at December 31, 2017. The majority of the natural gas 

hedge gains and losses are recovered through the traditional electric operating companies’ fuel cost recovery clauses.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, a portion of the Southern Company system’s energy-related derivative contracts were designated as 

regulatory hedges and were related to the applicable company’s fuel-hedging program. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as 

regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as they are recovered through the energy cost recovery 

clause. Certain other gains and losses on energy-related derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges, are initially deferred in OCI before 

being recognized in income in the same period as the hedged transaction. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are 

not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred. See Note 14 to the financial statements 

for additional information.

69

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

The Southern Company system uses exchange-traded market-observable contracts, which are categorized as Level 1 of the fair value 

hierarchy, and over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and 

thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 13 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. 

The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts at December 31, 2018 were as follows:

Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period

Total
Fair Value

$ (179)
(22)
—
$ (201)

Fair Value Measurements 
December 31, 2018

Year 1

$(59)
20
—
$(39)

Maturity

Years 2&3

(in millions)

$ (86)
(17)
—
$ (103)

Years 4&5

$(34)
(25)
—
$(59)

The Southern Company system is exposed to market price risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to energy-related and 

interest rate derivative contracts. The Southern Company system only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties 

that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody’s and S&P, or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit 

exposure. Therefore, the Southern Company system does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformance by the counterparties. For 

additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under “Financial Instruments” and Note 14 to the financial statements.

With the exception of Southern Company Gas’ subsidiary, Atlanta Gas Light, and the Southern Company Gas wholesale gas services 

business, the Southern Company system is not exposed to concentrations of credit risk. Concentration of credit risk occurs at Atlanta 

Gas Light for amounts billed for services and other costs to its customers, which consist of 15 Marketers in Georgia responsible for the 

retail sale of natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia. For 2018, the four largest Marketers based on customer count, which includes 

SouthStar, accounted for 20% of Southern Company Gas’ adjusted operating margin. Southern Company Gas’ wholesale gas services 

business has a concentration of credit risk for services it provides to its counterparties as measured by its 30-day receivable exposure plus 

forward exposure. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company Gas’ wholesale gas services business’ top 20 counterparties represented 

approximately 48%, or $298 million, of its total counterparty exposure and had a weighted average S&P equivalent credit rating of A-, 

all of which is consistent with the prior year.

Southern Company performs periodic reviews of its leveraged lease transactions, both domestic and international, and the creditworthiness 

of the lessees, including a review of the value of the underlying leased assets and the credit ratings of the lessees. Southern Company’s 

domestic lease transactions generally do not have any credit enhancement mechanisms; however, the lessees in its international lease 

transactions have pledged various deposits as additional security to secure the obligations. The lessees in Southern Company’s international 

lease transactions are also required to provide additional collateral in the event of a credit downgrade below a certain level.

Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The Southern Company system’s construction program is currently estimated to total approximately $8.0 billion for 2019, $7.7 billion 

for 2020, $6.7 billion for 2021, $6.3 billion for 2022, and $6.0 billion for 2023. These amounts include expenditures of approximately 

$1.5 billion, $1.2 billion, $1.0 billion, and $0.5 billion for the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, 

respectively. These amounts do not include up to approximately $0.5 billion per year on average for 2019 through 2023 for Southern 

Power’s planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth. These amounts also include capital expenditures related 

to contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under LTSAs. Estimated capital expenditures to 

comply with environmental laws and regulations included in these amounts are $0.5 billion, $0.2 billion, $0.3 billion, $0.3 billion, and 

$0.2 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance 

costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL 

– “Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations” and “ – Global Climate Issues” herein for additional information.

The traditional electric operating companies also anticipate costs associated with closure and monitoring of ash ponds in accordance with 

the CCR Rule, which are reflected in Southern Company’s ARO liabilities. These costs, which are expected to change and could change 

materially as underlying assumptions are refined and the cost and the method and timing of compliance activities continue to be evaluated, 

are currently estimated to be approximately $0.5 billion, $0.5 billion, $0.7 billion, $0.9 billion, and $0.9 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 

and 2023, respectively. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – “Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal 

Combustion Residuals” herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.

70

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

The construction programs are subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because 

of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; changes in environmental laws and 

regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to environmental rules; changes in electric generating plants, including unit retirements and 

replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing electric generating units, to meet regulatory requirements; changes in FERC rules 

and regulations; state regulatory agency approvals; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in legislation; the 

cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; storm impacts; and the cost of capital. 

In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures will be fully recovered. Additionally, planned expenditures 

for plant acquisitions may vary due to market opportunities and Southern Power’s ability to execute its growth strategy. See Note 15 to the 

financial statements under “Southern Power” for additional information regarding Southern Power’s plant acquisitions. 

The construction program also includes Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which includes components based on new technology that only recently 

began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale and which may be subject to additional revised cost estimates during 

construction. The ability to control costs and avoid cost and schedule overruns during the development, construction, and operation of new 

facilities is subject to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in labor costs, availability, and productivity; challenges with 

management of contractors, subcontractors, or vendors; adverse weather conditions; shortages, increased costs, or inconsistent quality 

of equipment, materials, and labor; contractor or supplier delay; non-performance under construction, operating, or other agreements; 

operational readiness, including specialized operator training and required site safety programs; engineering or design problems; design and 

other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC; challenges with 

start-up activities, including major equipment failure and system integration; and/or operational performance. See Note 2 to the financial 

statements under “Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction” for information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and additional factors that 

may impact construction expenditures.

As a result of NRC requirements, Alabama Power and Georgia Power have external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, 

Alabama Power currently has no additional funding requirements. For additional information, see Note 6 to the financial statements under 

“Nuclear Decommissioning.”

In addition, as discussed in Note 11 to the financial statements, the Southern Company system provides postretirement benefits to the 

majority of its employees and funds trusts to the extent required by PSCs, other applicable state regulatory agencies, or the FERC.

Funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, 

derivative obligations, preferred stock dividends of subsidiaries, leases, pipeline charges, storage capacity, gas supply, asset management 

agreements, other purchase commitments, ARO settlements, and trusts are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See 

Notes 1, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 14 to the financial statements for additional information.

71

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Contractual Obligations
The Southern Company system’s contractual obligations at December 31, 2018 (excluding Gulf Power) were as follows:

Long-term debt(a) —

Principal
Interest

Preferred stock dividends of subsidiaries(b)
Financial derivative obligations(c)
Operating leases(d)
Capital leases(d)
Pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply(e)
Asset management agreements(f)
Purchase commitments —

Capital(g)
Fuel(h)
Purchased power(i)
Other(j)

ARO settlements(k)
Trusts —

Nuclear decommissioning(l)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(m)

Total

2019

- 
2020 
2021

- 
2022 
2023

(in millions)

After 
2023

Total

$ 3,133
1,668
15
610
156
25
781
10

7,600
3,168
304
328
451

5
137
$18,391

$ 7,204
3,082
29
243
244
22
1,104
8

13,608
3,854
653
642
1,186

11
265
$32,155

$ 4,354
2,270
29
109
177
8
901
—

11,486
1,863
545
464
1,841

11
—
$24,058

$28,950
25,796
—
—
1,040
143
1,871
—

—
5,862
2,494
2,265
—

$ 43,641
32,816
73
962
1,617
198
4,657
18

32,694
14,747
3,996
3,699
3,478

88
—
$68,509

115
402
$143,113

(a)  All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates except for amounts related to FFB borrowings and certain revenue bonds. As it relates to the 

FFB borrowings, the final maturity date is February 20, 2044; however, principal amortization is reflected beginning in 2020. See Note 8 to the financial 
statements under “Long-term Debt – DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings” and “Securities Due Within One Year” for additional information. Southern 
Company and its subsidiaries plan to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost 
capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates at December 31, 2018, as reflected in the statements of 
capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk. Long-term debt excludes 
capital lease amounts (shown separately).

(b)  Represents preferred stock of Alabama Power. Preferred stock does not mature; therefore, amounts are provided for the next five years only.
(c)  See Notes 1 and 14 to the financial statements.
(d)  Excludes PPAs that are accounted for as leases and included in “Purchased power.”
(e)  Includes charges recoverable through a natural gas cost recovery mechanism, or alternatively billed to Marketers selling retail natural gas, and demand 

charges associated with Southern Company Gas’ wholesale gas services. The gas supply balance includes amounts for gas commodity purchase 
commitments associated with Southern Company Gas’ gas marketing services of 47 million mmBtu at floating gas prices calculated using forward natural 
gas prices at December 31, 2018 and valued at $150 million. Southern Company Gas provides guarantees to certain gas suppliers for certain of its 
subsidiaries in support of payment obligations.

(f)  Represents fixed-fee minimum payments for asset management agreements associated with wholesale gas services.
(g)  The Southern Company system provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with 

environmental regulations. These amounts exclude contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel, capital expenditures covered under LTSAs, and 
estimated capital expenditures for AROs, which are reflected in “Fuel,” “Other,” and “ARO settlements,” respectively. These amounts also exclude up to 
approximately $0.5 billion per year on average for 2019 through 2023 for Southern Power’s planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder 
growth. At December 31, 2018, significant purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. See FUTURE EARNINGS 
POTENTIAL – “Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations” and “Construction Programs” herein for additional information.

(h)  Primarily includes commitments to purchase coal, nuclear fuel, and natural gas, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these 

contracts contain provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based 
on various indices at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the NYMEX future 
prices at December 31, 2018.

(i)  Estimated minimum long-term obligations for various PPA purchases from gas-fired, biomass, and wind-powered facilities and capacity payments related 

to Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. See Note 9 to the financial statements under “Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements” for additional information.

(j)  Includes LTSAs, contracts for the procurement of limestone, contractual environmental remediation liabilities, and operation and maintenance agreements. 

LTSAs include price escalation based on inflation indices.

72

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

(k)  Represents estimated costs for a five-year period associated with closing and monitoring ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule and the related state 
rules, which are reflected in Southern Company’s ARO liabilities. Material expenditures in future years for ARO settlements also will be required for ash 
ponds, nuclear decommissioning, and other liabilities reflected in Southern Company’s AROs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – “Environmental Matters 
– Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals” herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.

(l)  Projections of nuclear decommissioning trust fund contributions for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 are based on the 2013 ARP for Georgia 
Power. Alabama Power also has external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, Alabama Power currently has no additional funding 
requirements. See Note 6 to the financial statements under “Nuclear Decommissioning” for additional information.

(m) The Southern Company system forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. Southern 

Company anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plans during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated 
benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated 
contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from corporate assets of Southern Company’s subsidiaries. See 
Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit 
payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from corporate assets of 
Southern Company’s subsidiaries.

73

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportConsolidated Statements of Income 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016

Operating Revenues:
Retail electric revenues
Wholesale electric revenues
Other electric revenues
Natural gas revenues
Other revenues
Total operating revenues
Operating Expenses:
Fuel
Purchased power
Cost of natural gas
Cost of other sales
Other operations and maintenance
Depreciation and amortization
Taxes other than income taxes
Estimated loss on plants under construction
Impairment charges
Gain on dispositions, net
Total operating expenses
Operating Income
Other Income and (Expense):
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
Earnings from equity method investments
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
Other income (expense), net
Total other income and (expense)
Earnings Before Income Taxes
Income taxes
Consolidated Net Income
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Consolidated Net Income Attributable to Southern Company
Common Stock Data:
Earnings per share —

Basic
Diluted

Average number of shares of common stock outstanding — (in millions)

Basic
Diluted

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2018

$15,222
2,516
664
3,854
1,239
23,495

4,637
971
1,539
806
5,889
3,131
1,315
1,097
210
(291)
19,304
4,191

138
148
(1,842)
114
(1,442)
2,749
449
2,300
16
58
$ 2,226

$

2.18
2.17

1,020
1,025

2017

(in millions)

$15,330
2,426
681
3,791
803
23,031

4,400
863
1,601
513
5,739
3,010
1,250
3,362
—
(40)
20,698
2,333

160
106
(1,694)
163
(1,265)
1,068
142
926
38
46
842

0.84
0.84

1,000
1,008

$

$

2016

$15,234
1,926
698
1,596
442
19,896

4,361
750
613
260
5,382
2,502
1,113
428
—
1
15,410
4,486

202
59
(1,317)
50
(1,006)
3,480
951
2,529
45
36
$ 2,448

$

2.57
2.55

951
958

74

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportConsolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016

Consolidated Net Income
Other comprehensive income (loss):

Qualifying hedges:

Changes in fair value, net of tax of $(16), $34, and $(84), respectively
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income, 

net of tax of $24, $(37), and $43, respectively

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:

Benefit plan net gain (loss), net of tax of $(2), $6, and $10, respectively
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income, 

net of tax of $5, $(6), and $3, respectively

Total other comprehensive income (loss)
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Consolidated Comprehensive Income Attributable to Southern Company

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2018

$2,300

2017

(in millions)

$926

(47)

72

(5)

6
26
16
58
$2,252

57

(60)

17

(23)
(9)
38
46
$833

2016

$ 2,529

(136)

69

13

4
(50)
45
36
$ 2,398

75

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportConsolidated Statements of Cash Flows 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016

Operating Activities:
Consolidated net income
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income
to net cash provided from operating activities —
Depreciation and amortization, total
Deferred income taxes
Collateral deposits
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
Pension and postretirement funding
Settlement of asset retirement obligations
Stock based compensation expense
Hedge settlements
Estimated loss on plants under construction
Impairment charges
Gain on dispositions, net
Other, net
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —

-Receivables
-Fossil fuel for generation
-Natural gas for sale
-Other current assets
-Accounts payable
-Accrued taxes
-Retail fuel cost over recovery
-Other current liabilities

Net cash provided from operating activities
Investing Activities:
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Property additions
Proceeds pursuant to the Toshiba Guarantee, net of joint owner portion
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund purchases
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
Proceeds from dispositions
Cost of removal, net of salvage
Change in construction payables, net
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries
Payments pursuant to LTSAs
Other investing activities
Net cash used for investing activities

2018

2017

(in millions)

2016

$ 2,300

$

926

$ 2,529

3,549
94
17
(138)
(4)
(244)
125
(10)
1,093
210
(301)
(22)

(426)
123
49
(127)
291
267
36
63
6,945

(65)
(8,001)
—
(1,117)
1,111
2,956
(388)
50
(114)
(186)
(6)
(5,760)

3,457
166
(4)
(160)
(2)
(177)
109
6
3,179
—
(42)
(112)

(202)
36
36
(143)
(280)
(142)
(212)
(45)
6,394

(1,054)
(7,423)
1,682
(811)
805
97
(313)
259
(152)
(227)
(53)
(7,190)

2,923
(127)
(102)
(202)
(1,029)
(171)
121
(233)
428
—
(2)
(219)

(544)
178
(226)
(206)
301
1,456
(231)
250
4,894

(10,680)
(7,310)
—
(1,160)
1,154
15
(245)
(121)
(1,444)
(134)
(122)
(20,047)

76

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportConsolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued) 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016

Financing Activities:
Increase (decrease) in notes payable, net
Proceeds —

Long-term debt
Common stock
Preferred stock
Short-term borrowings

Redemptions and repurchases —

Long-term debt
Preferred and preference stock
Short-term borrowings

Distributions to noncontrolling interests
Capital contributions from noncontrolling interests
Payment of common stock dividends
Other financing activities
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities
Net Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Year
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at End of Year
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid (received) during the period for —

Interest (net of $72, $89, and $128 capitalized, respectively)
Income taxes (net of refunds)

Noncash transactions — Accrued property additions at year-end

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2018

2017

(in millions)

2016

(774)

(401)

1,228

2,478
1,090
—
3,150

(5,533)
(33)
(1,900)
(153)
2,551
(2,425)
(264)
(1,813)
(628)
2,147
$ 1,519

$ 1,794
172
1,103

5,858
793
250
1,259

(2,930)
(658)
(659)
(119)
80
(2,300)
(222)
951
155
1,992
$ 2,147

$ 1,676
(410)
985

16,368
3,758
—
—

(3,145)
—
(478)
(72)
682
(2,104)
(512)
15,725
572
1,420
$ 1,992

$ 1,066
(148)
1,262

77

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportConsolidated Balance Sheets  
At December 31, 2018 and 2017

Assets

Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables —

Customer accounts receivable
Energy marketing receivable
Unbilled revenues
Under recovered fuel clause revenues
Other accounts and notes receivable
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts

Materials and supplies
Fossil fuel for generation
Natural gas for sale
Prepaid expenses
Assets from risk management activities, net of collateral
Other regulatory assets, current
Assets held for sale, current
Other current assets
Total current assets
Property, Plant, and Equipment:
In service
Less: Accumulated depreciation
Plant in service, net of depreciation
Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost
Construction work in progress
Total property, plant, and equipment
Other Property and Investments:
Goodwill
Equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries
Other intangible assets, net of amortization of $235 and $186 

at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively

Nuclear decommissioning trusts, at fair value
Leveraged leases
Miscellaneous property and investments
Total other property and investments
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:
Deferred charges related to income taxes
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt
Other regulatory assets
Assets held for sale
Other deferred charges and assets
Total deferred charges and other assets
Total Assets

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

78

2018

2017

(in millions)

$

1,396

$

2,130

1,726
801
654
115
813
(50)
1,465
405
524
432
222
525
393
162
9,583

103,706
31,038
72,668
875
7,254
80,797

5,315
1,580

613
1,721
798
269
10,296

794
323
8,308
5,350
1,463
16,238
$116,914

1,806
607
810
171
698
(44)
1,438
594
595
452
137
604
12
62
10,072

103,542
31,457
72,085
883
6,904
79,872

6,268
1,513

873
1,832
775
249
11,510

825
206
6,943
—
1,577
9,551
$111,005

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportConsolidated Balance Sheets (continued) 
At December 31, 2018 and 2017

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Current Liabilities:
Securities due within one year
Notes payable
Energy marketing trade payables
Accounts payable
Customer deposits
Accrued taxes
Accrued interest
Accrued compensation
Asset retirement obligations, current
Other regulatory liabilities, current
Liabilities held for sale, current
Other current liabilities
Total current liabilities
Long-Term Debt (See accompanying statements)
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:
Accumulated deferred income taxes
Deferred credits related to income taxes
Accumulated deferred ITCs
Employee benefit obligations
Asset retirement obligations
Accrued environmental remediation
Other cost of removal obligations
Other regulatory liabilities
Liabilities held for sale
Other deferred credits and liabilities
Total deferred credits and other liabilities
Total Liabilities
Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries (See accompanying statements)
Total Stockholders’ Equity (See accompanying statements)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Commitments and Contingent Matters (See notes)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2018

2017

(in millions)

$ 3,198
2,915
856
2,580
522
656
472
1,030
404
376
425
852
14,286
40,736

6,558
6,460
2,372
2,147
8,990
268
2,297
169
2,836
465
32,562
87,584
291
29,039
$116,914

$

3,892
2,439
546
2,530
542
636
488
959
351
337
—
874
13,594
44,462

6,842
7,256
2,267
2,256
4,473
389
2,684
239
—
691
27,097
85,153
324
25,528
$111,005

79

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportConsolidated Statements of Capitalization  
At December 31, 2018 and 2017

Long-Term Debt:
Long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts —
Variable rate (5.50% at 12/31/18) due 2042

Long-term senior notes and debt —

Maturity
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2025 through 2048
Variable rates (2.29% to 3.05% at 12/31/17) due 2018
Variable rates (3.10% to 3.50% at 12/31/18) due 2020
Variable rates (3.34% to 3.91% at 12/31/18) due 2021

Total long-term senior notes and debt
Other long-term debt —

Pollution control revenue bonds —

Maturity
2019
2022
2023
2025 through 2049
Variable rates (1.77% to 2.23% at 12/31/18) due 2019
Variable rates (1.76% to 1.87% at 12/31/18) due 2021
Variable rates (1.76% at 12/31/18) due 2022
Variable rates (1.70% to 1.87% at 12/31/18) due 2024 to 2053

Plant Daniel revenue bonds (7.13%) due 2021
Gas facility revenue bonds —

Variable rate (1.71% at 12/31/17) due 2022
Variable rate (1.71% at 12/31/17) due 2024 to 2033

FFB loans —

2.57% to 3.86% due 2020
2.57% to 3.86% due 2021
2.57% to 3.86% due 2022
2.57% to 3.86% due 2023
2.57% to 3.86% due 2024 to 2044

First mortgage bonds —
4.70% due 2019
5.80% due 2023
2.66% to 6.58% due 2026 to 2058

Junior subordinated notes (5.00% to 6.25%) due 2057 to 2077
Total other long-term debt
Unamortized fair value adjustment of long-term debt
Capitalized lease obligations
Unamortized debt premium
Unamortized debt discount
Unamortized debt issuance expense
Total long-term debt (annual interest requirement — $1.7 billion)
Less:

Amount due within one year
Amount held for sale

Long-term debt excluding amounts due within one year and held for sale

80

2018

2017

2018

2017

(in millions)

(percent of total)

$

206

$

206

Interest Rates
1.50% to 5.40%
1.85% to 5.55%
2.00% to 4.75%
2.35% to 9.10%
1.00% to 8.70%
2.45% to 5.75%
1.63% to 7.30%

Interest Rates
4.55%
2.10% to 2.35%
1.15% to 2.60%
1.40% to 5.15%

—
2,948
2,271
2,638
1,983
2,290
19,895
—
1,875
125
34,025

25
90
33
1,112
148
65
4
1,417
270

—
—

44
44
44
44
2,449

50
50
1,225
3,570
10,684
474
197
36
(194)
(208)
45,220

3,198
1,286
40,736

2,352
3,074
2,273
2,643
2,016
2,290
19,902
1,420
825
25
36,820

25
90
33
1,346
148
65
4
1,585
270

47
154

44
44
44
44
2,449

50
50
925
3,570
10,987
525
204
44
(206)
(226)
48,354

3,892
—
44,462

58.1%

63.2%

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportConsolidated Statements of Capitalization (continued) 
At December 31, 2018 and 2017

Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries:
Cumulative preferred stock

$100 par or stated value — 4.20% to 5.44%

Authorized — 20 million shares
Outstanding  — 2018: 475,115 shares  

— 2017: 809,325 shares

$1 par value — 5.83%

Authorized — 28 million shares
Outstanding — 10,000,000 shares

Total redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries
(annual dividend requirement — $15 million)

Common Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock, par value $5 per share —

Authorized — 1.5 billion shares
Issued  — 2018: 1.0 billion shares  

— 2017: 1.0 billion shares

Treasury  — 2018: 1.0 million shares  

— 2017: 0.9 million shares

Paid-in capital
Treasury, at cost
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total common stockholders’ equity
Noncontrolling interests
Total stockholders’ equity
Total Capitalization

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2018

2017

2018

2017

(in millions)

(percent of total)

48

81

243

291

243

324

5,164

5,038

0.4

0.5

11,094
(38)
8,706
(203)
24,723
4,316
29,039
$70,066

10,469
(36)
8,885
(189)
24,167
1,361
25,528
$70,314

35.3
6.2

34.4
1.9

100.0% 100.0%

81

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportConsolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity  
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016

Southern Company Common Stockholders’ Equity

Number of  

Common Shares

Common Stock

Issued Treasury

(in thousands)

Par 
Value

Paid-In 
Capital Treasury

Retained 
Earnings

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive 
Income 
(Loss)

Preferred
and 
Preference 
Stock of 
Subsidiaries

(in millions)

Noncontrolling

Interests(a)

Total

Balance at 

December 31, 2015

915,073 (3,352) $ 4,572 $ 6,282

$(142) $10,010

$(130)

$ 609

$ 781 $21,982

Consolidated net 

income attributable to 

Southern Company
Other comprehensive 

income (loss)

Stock issued
Stock-based 

compensation
Cash dividends of 

$2.2225 per share
Contributions from 

noncontrolling interests

Distributions to 

noncontrolling interests
Purchase of membership 

interests from 

noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable 

to noncontrolling 

interests

Other
Balance at 

—

—

—

—

—

2,448

—
76,140

—
2,599

—
380

—
3,263

—
115

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

120

—

—

—

—

—

—

— (2,104)

—

—

—

—

—

—
—

—
(66)

—
—

—
(4)

—
(4)

—
—

—

—

—

—

—
2

—

(50)
—

—

—

—

—

—

—
—

—

—
—

—

—

—

—

—

—
—

—

—
—

—

2,448

(50)
3,758

120

— (2,104)

618

618

(57)

(57)

(129)

(129)

32
—

32
(6)

December 31, 2016

991,213

(819)

4,952

9,661

(31)

10,356

(180)

609

1,245

26,612

Consolidated net 

income attributable to 

Southern Company
Other comprehensive 

income (loss)

Stock issued
Stock-based 

compensation
Cash dividends of 

$2.3000 per share

Preferred and preference 

stock redemptions
Contributions from 

noncontrolling interests

Distributions to 

noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable 

to noncontrolling 

interests

Reclassification 

from redeemable 

noncontrolling interests

Other

82

—

—
17,319

—

—

—

—

—

—

—
—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—
86

—

—

—

—

—

—

—
707

105

—

—

—

—

—

—
—

—

842

—
—

—

— (2,300)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—
—
— (110)

—
—

—
(4)

—
(5)

—
(13)

—

(9)
—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—
—

—

—
—

—

—

(609)

—

—

—

—
—

—

—
—

—

842

(9)
793

105

— (2,300)

—

79

(609)

79

(122)

(122)

44

44

114
1

114
(21)

Southern Company 2018 Annual Report 
 
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (continued) 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016

Southern Company Common Stockholders’ Equity

Number of  

Common Shares

Common Stock

Issued Treasury

(in thousands)

Par 
Value

Paid-In 
Capital Treasury

Retained 
Earnings

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive 
Income 
(Loss)

Preferred
and 
Preference 
Stock of 
Subsidiaries

(in millions)

Noncontrolling

Interests(a)

Total

Balance at 

December 31, 2017

1,008,532

(929) 5,038 10,469

(36)

8,885

(189)

Consolidated net 

income attributable to 

Southern Company
Other comprehensive 

income (loss)

Stock issued
Stock-based 

compensation
Cash dividends of 

$2.3800 per share
Contributions from 

noncontrolling interests

Distributions to 

noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable 

to noncontrolling 

interests

Sale of noncontrolling 

interests

Other
Balance at 

—

—
26,209

—

—

—

—

—

—
—

—

—
—

—

—

—

—

—

—
(24)

—

—

— 2,226

—
126

—
964

—

—

—

—

—

—
—

84

—

—

—

—

(417)
(6)

—
—

—

—
—

—

— (2,425)

—

—

—

—
(2)

—

—

—

—
20

—

26
—

—

—

—

—

—

—
(40)

—

—

—
—

—

—

—

—

—

—
—

1,361

25,528

—

—
—

—

2,226

26
1,090

84

— (2,425)

1,372

1,372

(164)

(164)

58

58

1,690
(1)

1,273
(29)

December 31, 2018

1,034,741

(953) $5,164 $11,094

$ (38) $ 8,706

$(203)

$ —

$4,316 $29,039

(a)  Excludes redeemable noncontrolling interests. See Note 7 to the financial statements under “Noncontrolling Interests” for additional information.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

83

Southern Company 2018 Annual Report 
 
Index to the Notes to Financial Statements

85

106

129

134

136

140

144

147

158

161

169

191

195

201

209

215

220

Note 1

Note 2

Note 3

Note 4

Note 5

Note 6

Note 7

Note 8

Note 9

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Regulatory Matters

Contingencies

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Property, Plant, and Equipment

Asset Retirement Obligations

Consolidated Entities and Equity Method Investments

Financing

Commitments

Note 10

Income Taxes

Note 11

Retirement Benefits

Note 12

Stock Compensation

Note 13

Fair Value Measurements

Note 14

Derivatives

Note 15

Acquisitions and Dispositions

Note 16

Segment and Related Information

Note 17

Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

84

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

General
Southern Company is the parent company of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as 

of July 1, 2016), SCS, Southern Linc, Southern Holdings, Southern Nuclear, PowerSecure (as of May 9, 2016), and other direct and indirect 

subsidiaries. The traditional electric operating companies – Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power (through December 31, 2018), and 

Mississippi Power – are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in four Southeastern states. On January 1, 2019, Southern 

Company completed the sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power 

generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. On May 22, 

2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of 

Southern Power’s solar facilities, and, on December 11, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a 

holding company owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities. On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement 

to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction). On December 4, 2018, 

Southern Power sold all of its equity interests in Plant Oleander and Plant Stanton Unit A (together, the Florida Plants) to NextEra Energy. 

Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through natural gas distribution utilities and is involved in several other complementary 

businesses including gas pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services. In July 2018, Southern Company 

Gas completed sales of three of its natural gas distribution utilities (Elizabethtown Gas (New Jersey), Florida City Gas, and Elkton Gas 

(Maryland)). The remaining natural gas distribution utilities include Nicor Gas (Illinois), Atlanta Gas Light (Georgia), Virginia Natural Gas, and 

Chattanooga Gas (Tennessee). In June 2018, Southern Company Gas also completed the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions, which provided 

home equipment protection products and services. SCS, the system service company, provides, at cost, specialized services to Southern 

Company and its subsidiary companies. Southern Linc provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its 

subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast. Southern 

Holdings is an intermediate holding company subsidiary, primarily for Southern Company’s investments in leveraged leases and for other 

electric services. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to the Southern Company system’s nuclear power plants, including 

Alabama Power’s Plant Farley and Georgia Power’s Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, and is currently managing construction of 

and developing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which are co-owned by Georgia Power. PowerSecure is a provider of energy solutions, including 

distributed energy infrastructure, energy efficiency products and services, and utility infrastructure services, to customers. See Note 15 for 

additional information regarding disposition activities.

The registrants’ financial statements reflect investments in subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Intercompany transactions have been 

eliminated in consolidation. The equity method is used for investments in entities in which a registrant has significant influence but does 

not control and for VIEs where a registrant has an equity investment but is not the primary beneficiary. Southern Power has consolidated 

renewable generation projects that are partially funded by tax equity investors. The related contractual provisions represent profit-sharing 

arrangements because the allocations of cash distributions and tax benefits are not based on fixed ownership percentages. Therefore, 

the noncontrolling interest is accounted for under a balance sheet approach utilizing the HLBV method. The HLBV method calculates each 

partner’s share of income based on the change in net equity the partner can legally claim in a HLBV at the end of the period compared to 

the beginning of the period. See Note 7 for additional information.

The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, certain subsidiaries of Southern Company Gas, and certain other subsidiaries 

are subject to regulation by the FERC, and the traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities are also subject 

to regulation by their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies. As such, the respective financial statements of the 

registrants reflect the effects of rate regulation in accordance with GAAP and comply with the accounting policies and practices prescribed 

by relevant state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates, and the actual results may differ from 

those estimates. Certain prior years’ data presented in the financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year 

presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on the registrants’ results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. In addition, 

Southern Company Gas has recast its reportable segments. See Note 16 under “Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

85

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

At December 31, 2018, Southern Company and Southern Power each had assets and liabilities held for sale on their balance sheets. Unless 

otherwise noted, the disclosures herein related to specific asset and liability balances at December 31, 2018 exclude assets and liabilities 

held for sale. See Note 15 under “Assets Held for Sale” for additional information including Southern Company’s and Southern Power’s 

major classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale.

Southern Company Gas
Pursuant to the Merger, Southern Company pushed down the application of the acquisition method of accounting to the financial 

statements of Southern Company Gas such that the assets and liabilities are recorded at their respective fair values, and goodwill was 

established for the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net identifiable assets. Accordingly, the financial statements of 

Southern Company Gas for periods before and after July 1, 2016 (acquisition date) reflect different bases of accounting, and the financial 

positions and results of operations of those periods are not comparable. Throughout Southern Company Gas’ financial statements and the 

combined notes to the financial statements, periods prior to July 1, 2016 are identified as “predecessor,” while periods after the acquisition 

date are identified as “successor.”

Certain predecessor period data presented in Southern Company Gas’ financial statements has been modified or reclassified to conform 

to the presentation used by Southern Company. Changes to Southern Company Gas’ statements of income include classifying operating 

revenues as natural gas revenues and other revenues, as well as classifying cost of goods sold as cost of natural gas and cost of other sales 

and presenting interest expense and AFUDC on a gross basis. Changes to Southern Company Gas’ statements of cash flows include revised 

financial statement line item descriptions to align with the new balance sheet descriptions and expanded line items within each category 

of cash flow activity.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and 

industry-specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with 

customers. The underlying principle of the standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at 

the amount expected to be collected. ASC 606 became effective on January 1, 2018 and the registrants adopted it using the modified 

retrospective method applied to open contracts and only to the version of contracts in effect as of January 1, 2018. In accordance with the 

modified retrospective method, the registrants’ previously issued financial statements have not been restated to comply with ASC 606 and 

the registrants did not have a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The adoption of ASC 606 had no significant impact on 

the timing of revenue recognition compared to previously reported results; however, it requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, 

amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers, which are included herein 

and in Note 4.

ASC 606 provided additional clarity on financial statement presentation that resulted in reclassifications into other revenues and 

other operations and maintenance from other income/(expense), net at Alabama Power and Georgia Power primarily related to certain 

unregulated sales of products and services. In addition, contract assets related to certain fixed retail revenues at Georgia Power and 

Southern Company’s unregulated distributed generation business have been reclassified from unbilled revenue in accordance with the 

guidance in ASC 606. These reclassifications did not affect the timing or amount of revenues recognized or cash flows. ASC 606 also 

provided additional guidance on revenue recognized over time, resulting in a change in the timing of revenue recognized from guaranteed 

and fixed billing arrangements at Southern Company Gas.

86

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

The specific impacts of applying ASC 606 to revenues from contracts with customers on the financial statements of Southern Company, 

Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Southern Company Gas compared to previously recognized guidance is shown below.

Statements of Income

Southern Company

Natural gas revenues
Other revenues
Other operations and maintenance
Operating Income
Other income (expense), net
Earnings Before Income Taxes
Income taxes
Consolidated Net Income
Consolidated Net Income Attributable to Southern Company

Alabama Power
Other revenues
Other operations and maintenance
Taxes other than income taxes
Operating Income
Other income (expense), net

Georgia Power

Other revenues
Other operations and maintenance
Operating Income
Other income (expense), net

Southern Company Gas
Natural gas revenues
Operating Income
Earnings Before Income Taxes
Income taxes
Net Income

For the Year Ended December 31, 2018

As 
Reported

Balances 
Without 
Adoption of 
ASC 606

(in millions)

Effect of 
Change

$3,854
1,239
5,889
4,191
114
2,749
449
2,300
2,226

$ 267
1,669
389
1,477
20

$ 481
1,860
1,289
115

$3,874
915
836
464
372

$3,852
1,234
5,830
4,243
60
2,747
448
2,299
2,225

$ 230
1,625
388
1,485
12

$ 387
1,772
1,283
121

$3,872
913
834
463
371

$ 2
5
59
(52)
54
2
1
1
1

$ 37
44
1
(8)
8

$ 94
88
6
(6)

$ 2
2
2
1
1

87

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Statements of Cash Flows

Southern Company

Consolidated net income
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities:

Receivables
Other current assets
Accrued taxes
Other current liabilities

Georgia Power

Changes in certain current assets and liabilities:

Receivables
Other current assets

Southern Company Gas

Net income
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities:

Accrued taxes
Other current liabilities

Balance Sheets

Southern Company
Unbilled revenues
Other accounts and notes receivable
Other current assets
Accrued taxes
Other current liabilities
Total Stockholders’ Equity

Georgia Power

Unbilled revenues
Other accounts and notes receivable
Other current assets

Southern Company Gas
Accrued income taxes
Other current liabilities
Common Stockholder’s Equity

88

For the Year Ended December 31, 2018

As 
Reported

Balances 
Without 
Adoption of
ASC 606

(in millions)

Effect of 
Change

$2,300

$2,299

$ 1

(426)
(127)
267
63

(472)
(81)
268
61

$

8
(43)

$

1
(36)

46
(46)
(1)
2

$ 7
(7)

$ 372

$ 371

$ 1

10
(22)

11
(24)

(1)
2

At December 31, 2018

Balances 
Without 
Adoption of
ASC 606

(in millions)

Effect of  
Change

$

728
814
87
655
854
29,038

$

$

243
81
34

65
132
8,569

$(74)
(1)
75
1
(2)
1

$(35)
(1)
36

$ 1
(2)
1

As 
Reported

$

654
813
162
656
852
29,039

$

$

208
80
70

66
130
8,570

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Other
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18). ASU 2016-18 eliminates the 

need to reflect transfers between cash and restricted cash in operating, investing, and financing activities in the statements of cash flows. In 

addition, the net change in cash and cash equivalents during the period includes amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted 

cash equivalents. The registrants adopted ASU 2016-18 retrospectively effective January 1, 2018. Southern Company, Southern Power, and 

Southern Company Gas have restated prior periods in the statements of cash flows by immaterial amounts. The change in restricted cash 

in the statements of cash flows was previously disclosed in operating activities for Southern Company and Southern Company Gas and in 

investing activities for Southern Company and Southern Power. See “Restricted Cash” herein for additional information.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment 

(ASU 2017-04). ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount as part of 

Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Under the new standard, the goodwill impairment loss will be measured as the excess of a reporting 

unit’s carrying amount over its fair value, not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit, which may increase the 

frequency of goodwill impairment charges if a future goodwill impairment test does not pass the Step 1 evaluation. ASU 2017-04 is effective 

prospectively for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The registrants adopted ASU 2017-04 

effective January 1, 2018 with no impact on their respective financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net 

Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the 

service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic 

pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the statements of income outside of income from operations. 

Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. The registrants adopted ASU 2017-07 effective 

January 1, 2018 with no material impact on their respective financial statements. ASU 2017-07 has been applied retrospectively, with the 

service cost component of net periodic benefit costs included in operations and maintenance expenses and all other components of net 

periodic benefit costs included in other income (expense), net in the statements of income for all periods presented for Southern Company, 

the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Company Gas. The impacted registrants used the practical expedient provided 

by ASU 2017-07, which permits an employer to use the amounts disclosed in its retirement benefits note for prior comparative periods 

as the estimation basis for applying the retrospective presentation requirements to those periods. The amounts of the other components 

of net periodic benefit costs reclassified for the prior periods are presented in Note 11. The presentation changes resulted in a decrease in 

operating income and an increase in other income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 for each of the impacted registrants. 

Since Southern Power did not participate in the qualified pension and postretirement benefit plans until December 2017, no retrospective 

presentation of Southern Power’s net periodic benefit costs is required. The requirement to limit capitalization to the service cost 

component of net periodic benefit costs has been applied on a prospective basis from the date of adoption for all registrants.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging 

Activities (ASU 2017-12). ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the 

related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for 

fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The registrants adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 

2018 with no material impact on their respective financial statements. See Note 14 for disclosures required by ASU 2017-12.

On February 14, 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification 

of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (ASU 2018-02) to address the application of ASC 740, Income Taxes 

(ASC 740) to certain provisions of the Tax Reform Legislation. ASU 2018-02 specifically addresses the ASC 740 requirement that the effect 

of a change in tax laws or rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities be included in income from continuing operations, even when the tax 

effects were initially recognized directly in OCI at the previous rate, which strands the income tax rate differential in accumulated OCI. The 

amendments in ASU 2018-02 allow a reclassification from accumulated OCI to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from 

the Tax Reform Legislation. The registrants adopted ASU 2018-02 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on their respective 

financial statements.

On August 28, 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14, Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans – General (Topic 715-20): 

Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans (ASU 2018-14). ASU 2018-14 amends ASC 715 to 

add, remove, and clarify disclosure requirements related to defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The registrants adopted 

ASU 2018-14 effective December 31, 2018 with no material impact on their respective financial statements. See Note 11 for disclosures 

required by ASU 2018-14.

89

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Affiliate Transactions
The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas have agreements with SCS under which certain 

of the following services are rendered to them at direct or allocated cost: general executive and advisory, general and design engineering, 

operations, purchasing, accounting, finance, treasury, legal, tax, information technology, marketing, auditing, insurance and pension 

administration, human resources, systems and procedures, digital wireless communications, cellular tower space, and other services with 

respect to business and operations, construction management, and power pool transactions. These costs are primarily included in other 

operations and maintenance expenses or capitalized to property, plant, and equipment. Costs for these services from SCS in 2018, 2017, 

and 2016 were as follows:

2018
2017
2016

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

$508
479
460

$653
625
606

Mississippi 
Power

(in millions)

$104
140
231

Southern

Power(a)

$ 98
218
193

Southern  
Company  
Gas(b)

$194
63
17

(a)  Prior to December 2017, Southern Power had no employees but was billed for employee-related costs from SCS.
(b)  Southern Company Gas’ 2016 costs represent services provided subsequent to the Merger.

Alabama Power and Georgia Power also have agreements with Southern Nuclear under which Southern Nuclear renders the following 

nuclear-related services at cost: general executive and advisory services; general operations, management, and technical services; 

administrative services including procurement, accounting, employee relations, systems, and procedures services; strategic planning and 

budgeting services; other services with respect to business and operations; and, for Georgia Power, construction management. These 

costs are primarily included in other operations and maintenance expenses or capitalized to property, plant, and equipment. Costs for 

these services in 2018, 2017, and 2016 amounted to $247 million, $248 million, and $249 million, respectively, for Alabama Power and 

$780 million, $675 million, and $666 million, respectively, for Georgia Power. See Note 2 under “Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction” 

for additional information regarding Southern Nuclear’s construction management of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 for Georgia Power.

Cost allocation methodologies used by SCS and Southern Nuclear prior to the repeal of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 

as amended, were approved by the SEC. Subsequently, additional cost allocation methodologies have been reported to the FERC and 

management believes they are reasonable. The FERC permits services to be rendered at cost by system service companies.

Alabama Power’s and Georgia Power’s total power purchased from affiliates through the power pool is included in purchased power, 

affiliates on their respective statements of income. Mississippi Power’s and Southern Power’s total power purchased from affiliates through 

the power pool is included in purchased power on their respective statements of income and was as follows:

2018
2017
2016

Mississippi 
Power

Southern
Power

(in millions)

$15
16
29

$41
27
21

SCS, as agent for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas, has long-term interstate natural gas 

transportation agreements with SNG. The interstate transportation service provided to Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power, 

and Southern Company Gas by SNG pursuant to these agreements is governed by the terms and conditions of SNG’s natural gas tariff 

and is subject to FERC regulation. See Notes 7 and 15 under “Southern Company Gas – Equity Method Investments – SNG” and “Southern 

Company Gas – Investment in SNG,” respectively, for additional information. Transportation costs under these agreements in 2018, 2017, 

and 2016 were as follows:

2018
2017
2016(*)

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Southern
Power

$8
9
2

(in millions)

$101
102
35

$25
25
7

Southern  
Company  
Gas

$32
32
15

(*)  Represents costs incurred for the period subsequent to Southern Company Gas’ investment in SNG.

90

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

On November 16, 2018, SNG completed its purchase of Georgia Power’s natural gas lateral pipeline serving Plant McDonough Units 4 through 

6 at net book value, as approved by the Georgia PSC on January 16, 2018. SNG expects to pay $142 million to Georgia Power in the first 

quarter 2020. During the interim period, Georgia Power will receive a discounted shipping rate to reflect the delayed consideration. Southern 

Company Gas’ portion of the expected capital expenditures for the purchase of this pipeline and additional construction is $122 million.

SCS, as agent for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power, has agreements with certain subsidiaries of Southern 

Company Gas to purchase natural gas. Natural gas purchases made under these agreements were immaterial for Alabama Power and 

Mississippi Power and as follows for Georgia Power and Southern Power in 2018, 2017, and 2016:

2018
2017
2016(*)

Georgia 
Power

Southern
Power

(in millions)

$21
22
10

$119
119
17

(*)  Represents costs incurred for the period subsequent to Southern Company’s acquisition of Southern Company Gas.

Alabama Power and Mississippi Power jointly own Plant Greene County. The companies have an agreement under which Alabama Power 

operates Plant Greene County and Mississippi Power reimburses Alabama Power for its proportionate share of non-fuel expenses, which 

totaled $8 million, $9 million, and $13 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Mississippi Power also reimburses Alabama Power for 

any direct fuel purchases delivered from one of Alabama Power’s transfer facilities. There were no such fuel purchases in 2018, 2017, and 

2016. See Note 5 under “Joint Ownership Agreements” for additional information.

Alabama Power has an agreement with Gulf Power under which Alabama Power made transmission system upgrades to ensure firm 

delivery of energy under a non-affiliate PPA from a combined cycle plant located in Autauga County, Alabama. Under a related tariff, 

Alabama Power received $11 million in 2018, $11 million in 2017, and $12 million in 2016. See Note 15 under “Southern Company’s 

Sale of Gulf Power” for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.

Alabama Power has agreements with PowerSecure for services related to utility infrastructure construction, distributed energy, and energy 

efficiency projects. Costs for these services amounted to approximately $24 million in 2018 and $11 million in 2017 and were immaterial 

in 2016.

See Note 7 under “SEGCO” for information regarding Alabama Power’s and Georgia Power’s equity method investment in SEGCO and 

related affiliate purchased power costs, as well as Alabama Power’s gas pipeline ownership agreement with SEGCO.

Georgia Power has entered into several PPAs with Southern Power for capacity and energy. Total expenses associated with these PPAs were 

$216 million, $235 million, and $265 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. See Note 8 under “Long-term Debt – Capital Leases – 

Georgia Power” and Note 9 under “Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements – Affiliate” for additional information.

Georgia Power has a joint ownership agreement with Gulf Power under which Gulf Power owns a 25% portion of Plant Scherer Unit 3. 

Under this agreement, Georgia Power operates Plant Scherer Unit 3 and Gulf Power reimburses Georgia Power for its 25% proportionate 
share of the related non-fuel expenses, which were $8 million, $11 million, and $8 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. See Note 5 

under “Joint Ownership Agreements” and Note 15 under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” for additional information.

Mississippi Power has an agreement with Gulf Power under which Gulf Power owns a portion of Plant Daniel. Mississippi Power operates 

Plant Daniel and Gulf Power reimburses Mississippi Power for its proportionate share of all associated expenditures and costs, which 

totaled $31 million, $31 million, and $26 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. See Note 5 under “Joint Ownership Agreements” 

and Note 15 under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” for additional information.

In 2014, prior to Southern Company's 2016 acquisition of PowerSecure, Georgia Power entered into agreements with PowerSecure to 

build solar power generation facilities at two U.S. Army bases, as approved by the Georgia PSC. In October 2016, the two facilities began 

commercial operation. Payments of $32 million made by Georgia Power to PowerSecure under the agreements since Southern Company's 

acquisition of PowerSecure are included in plant in service at December 31, 2018.

Southern Power's total revenues from all PPAs with Georgia Power, included in wholesale revenue affiliates on Southern Power's 

consolidated statements of income, were $215 million, $233 million, and $258 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Included 

within these revenues were affiliate PPAs accounted for as operating leases, which totaled $65 million, $81 million, and $109 million for 

2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

91

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Southern Power has several agreements with SCS for transmission services. Transmission services purchased by Southern Power from 

SCS totaled $12 million, $13 million, and $11 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and were charged to other operations and 

maintenance in Southern Power's consolidated statements of income. All charges were billed to Southern Power based on the Southern 

Company Open Access Transmission Tariff as filed with the FERC.

The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may jointly enter into various types of wholesale energy, natural gas, 

and certain other contracts, either directly or through SCS as agent. Each participating company may be jointly and severally liable for the 

obligations incurred under these agreements. See Note 9 under “Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements” for additional information. Southern 

Power and the traditional electric operating companies generally settle amounts related to the above transactions on a monthly basis in 

the month following the performance of such services or the purchase or sale of electricity. See “Revenues – Southern Power” herein for 

additional information.

The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas provide incidental services to and receive such 

services from other Southern Company subsidiaries which are generally minor in duration and amount. Except as described herein, the 

traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas neither provided nor received any material services 

to or from affiliates in 2018, 2017, or 2016.

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities are subject to accounting requirements for the effects of 

rate regulation. Regulatory assets represent probable future revenues associated with certain costs that are expected to be recovered from 

customers through the ratemaking process. Regulatory liabilities represent probable future reductions in revenues associated with amounts 

that are expected to be credited to customers through the ratemaking process.

In the event that a portion of a traditional electric operating company's or a natural gas distribution utility's operations is no longer 

subject to applicable accounting rules for rate regulation, such company would be required to write off to income or reclassify to AOCI 

related regulatory assets and liabilities that are not specifically recoverable through regulated rates. In addition, the traditional electric 

operating company or natural gas distribution utility would be required to determine if any impairment to other assets, including plant, 

exists and write down the assets, if impaired, to their fair values. All regulatory assets and liabilities are to be reflected in rates. See Note 

2 for additional information including details of regulatory assets and liabilities reflected in the balance sheets for Southern Company, the 

traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Company Gas.

Revenues
The registrants generate revenues from a variety of sources which are accounted for under various revenue accounting guidance, including 

ASC 606, lease, derivative, and regulatory accounting. Other than the timing of recognition of guaranteed and fixed billing arrangements at 

Southern Company Gas, the adoption of ASC 606 had no impact on the timing or amount of revenue recognized under previous guidance. 

See “Recently Adopted Accounting Standards – Revenue” herein and Note 4 for information regarding the registrants' adoption of ASC 606 

and related disclosures.

Traditional Electric Operating Companies
The majority of the revenues of the traditional electric operating companies are generated from contracts with retail electric customers. 

Retail revenues recognized under ASC 606 are consistent with prior revenue recognition policies. These revenues, generated from the 

integrated service to deliver electricity when and if called upon by the customer, are recognized as a single performance obligation satisfied 

over time, at a tariff rate, and as electricity is delivered to the customer during the month. Unbilled revenues related to retail sales are 

accrued at the end of each fiscal period. Retail rates may include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, fuel hedging, the 

energy component of purchased power costs, and certain other costs. Revenues are adjusted for differences between these actual costs 

and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Under or over recovered regulatory clause revenues are recorded in the balance sheets and 

are recovered from or returned to customers, respectively, through adjustments to the billing factors. See Note 2 for additional information 

regarding regulatory matters of the traditional electric operating companies.

Wholesale capacity revenues from PPAs are recognized either on a levelized basis over the appropriate contract period or the amount 

billable under the contract terms. Energy and other revenues are generally recognized as services are provided. The accounting for these 

revenues under ASC 606 is consistent with prior revenue recognition policies. The contracts for capacity and energy in a wholesale PPA 

have multiple performance obligations where the contract's total transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based 

on the standalone selling price. The standalone selling price is primarily determined by the price charged to customers for the specific 

goods or services transferred with the performance obligations. Generally, the traditional electric operating companies recognize revenue 

as the performance obligations are satisfied over time as electricity is delivered to the customer or as generation capacity is available to 
the customer.

92

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

For both retail and wholesale revenues, the traditional electric operating companies generally have a right to consideration in an amount 
that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the entity's performance completed to date and may recognize revenue in 
the amount to which the entity has a right to invoice and has elected to recognize revenue for its sales of electricity and capacity using 
the invoice practical expedient. In addition, payment for goods and services rendered is typically due in the subsequent month following 
satisfaction of the registrants' performance obligation.

Southern Power
Southern Power sells capacity and energy at rates specified under contractual terms in long-term PPAs. These PPAs are accounted for as 
operating leases, non-derivatives, or normal sale derivatives. Capacity revenues from PPAs classified as operating leases are recognized on a 
straight-line basis over the term of the agreement. Energy revenues are recognized in the period the energy is delivered.

Southern Power's non-lease contracts commonly include capacity and energy which are considered separate performance obligations. 
In these contracts, the total transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the standalone selling price. The 
standalone selling price is primarily determined by the price charged to customers for the specific goods or services transferred with the 
performance obligations. Generally, Southern Power recognizes revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied over time, as electricity 
is delivered to the customer or as generation capacity is made available to the customer. The timing of revenue recognition was not 
affected by the adoption of ASC 606.

Southern Power generally has a right to consideration in an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the 
entity's performance completed to date and may recognize revenue in the amount to which the entity has a right to invoice. In addition, 
payment for goods and services rendered is typically due in the subsequent month following satisfaction of Southern Power's performance 
obligation.

When multiple contracts exist with the same counterparty, the revenues from each contract are accounted for as separate arrangements.

Southern Power may also enter into contracts to sell short-term capacity in the wholesale electricity markets. These sales are generally 
classified as mark-to-market derivatives and net unrealized gains and losses on such contracts are recorded in wholesale revenues. See 
Note 14 and “Financial Instruments” herein for additional information.

Southern Company Gas

Gas Distribution Operations
Southern Company Gas records revenues when goods or services are provided to customers. Those revenues are based on rates approved 
by the state regulatory agencies of the natural gas distribution utilities. The natural gas market for Atlanta Gas Light was deregulated in 
1997. Accordingly, Marketers, rather than a traditional utility, sell natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia and handle customer billing 
functions. As required by the Georgia PSC, Atlanta Gas Light bills Marketers in equal monthly installments for each residential, commercial, 
and industrial end-use customer's distribution costs as well as for capacity costs utilizing a seasonal rate design for the calculation of each 
residential end-use customer's annual straight-fixed-variable charge, which reflects the historic volumetric usage pattern for the entire 
residential class.

The majority of the revenues of Southern Company Gas are generated from contracts with natural gas distribution customers. Revenues 
from this integrated service to deliver gas when and if called upon by the customer is recognized as a single performance obligation 
satisfied over time and is recognized at a tariff rate as gas is delivered to the customer during the month.

The standalone selling price is primarily determined by the price charged to customers for the specific goods or services transferred with 
the performance obligations. Generally, Southern Company Gas recognizes revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied over time 
as natural gas is delivered to the customer. The performance obligations related to wholesale gas services are satisfied, and revenue is 
recognized, at a point in time when natural gas is delivered to the customer.

Southern Company Gas generally has a right to consideration in an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of 
the entity's performance completed to date and may recognize revenue in the amount to which the entity has a right to invoice and has 
elected to recognize revenue for its sales of natural gas using the invoice practical expedient. In addition, payment for goods and services 
rendered is typically due in the subsequent month following satisfaction of Southern Company Gas' performance obligation.

With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the natural gas distribution utilities have rate structures that include volumetric rate designs that 
allow the opportunity to recover certain costs based on gas usage. Revenues from sales and transportation services are recognized in the 
same period in which the related volumes are delivered to customers. Revenues from residential and certain commercial and industrial 
customers are recognized on the basis of scheduled meter readings. Additionally, unbilled revenues are recognized for estimated deliveries 
of gas not yet billed to these customers, from the last bill date to the end of the accounting period. For other commercial and industrial 
customers and for all wholesale customers, revenues are based on actual deliveries through the end of the period.

93

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

The tariffs for several of the natural gas distribution utilities include provisions which allow for the recognition of certain revenues prior 

to the time such revenues are billed to customers. These provisions are referred to as alternative revenue programs and provide for the 

recognition of certain revenues prior to billing, as long as the amounts recognized will be collected from customers within 24 months of 

recognition. These programs are as follows:

 O Weather normalization adjustments – reduce customer bills when winter weather is colder than normal and increase customer bills 

when weather is warmer than normal and are included in the tariffs for Virginia Natural Gas, Chattanooga Gas, and, prior to its sale, 

Elizabethtown Gas;

 O Revenue normalization mechanisms – mitigate the impact of conservation and declining customer usage and are contained in the tariffs 

for Virginia Natural Gas, Chattanooga Gas, and, prior to its sale, Elkton Gas; and

 O Revenue true-up adjustment – included within the provisions of the Georgia Rate Adjustment Mechanism (GRAM) program in which 

Atlanta Gas Light participates as a short-term alternative to formal rate case filings, the revenue true-up feature provides for a monthly 

positive (or negative) adjustment to record revenue in the amount of any variance to budgeted revenues, which are submitted and 

approved annually as a requirement of GRAM. Such adjustments are reflected in customer billings in a subsequent program year.

Wholesale Gas Services

Southern Company Gas nets revenues from energy and risk management activities with the associated costs. Profits from sales between 

segments are eliminated and are recognized as goods or services sold to end-use customers. Southern Company Gas records transactions 

that qualify as derivatives at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings in the period of change and characterized as 

unrealized gains or losses. Gains and losses on derivatives held for energy trading purposes are presented on a net basis in revenue.

Gas Marketing Services

Southern Company Gas recognizes revenues from natural gas sales and transportation services in the same period in which the related 

volumes are delivered to customers and recognizes sales revenues from residential and certain commercial and industrial customers on the 

basis of scheduled meter readings. Southern Company Gas also recognizes unbilled revenues for estimated deliveries of gas not yet billed 

to these customers from the most recent meter reading date to the end of the accounting period. For other commercial and industrial 

customers and for all wholesale customers, revenues are based on actual deliveries during the period.

Southern Company Gas recognizes revenues on 12-month utility-bill management contracts as the lesser of cumulative earned or 

cumulative billed amounts. Prior to the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions, revenues for warranty and repair contracts were recognized on 

a straight-line basis over the contract term while revenues for maintenance services were recognized at the time such services were 

performed. See Note 15 under “Southern Company Gas – Sale of Pivotal Home Solutions” for additional information.

Concentration of Revenue
Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power (with the exception of its cost-based MRA electric tariffs described 

below), and Southern Company Gas each have a diversified base of customers and no single customer or industry comprises 10% or more 

of each company's revenues.

Mississippi Power serves long-term contracts with rural electric cooperative associations and municipalities located in southeastern 
Mississippi under cost-based MRA electric tariffs, which are subject to regulation by the FERC. The contracts with these wholesale 

customers represented 17.3% of Mississippi Power's total operating revenues in 2018 and are generally subject to 10-year rolling 

cancellation notices. Historically, these wholesale customers have acted as a group and any changes in contractual relationships for 

one customer are likely to be followed by the other wholesale customers.

Significant portions of Southern Power’s revenues have been derived from certain customers pursuant to PPAs. The following table shows 

the percentage of total revenues for Southern Power's top three customers for each of the years presented:

Georgia Power
Duke Energy Corporation
Southern California Edison
Morgan Stanley Capital Group
San Diego Gas & Electric Company

2018

9.8%
6.8%
6.2%
N/A
N/A

2017
11.3%
6.7%
N/A
4.5%
N/A

2016
16.5%
7.8%
N/A
N/A
5.7%

On January 29, 2019, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) filed petitions to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. 
Southern Power, together with its noncontrolling partners, owns four solar facilities where PG&E is the energy off-taker for approximately 
207 MWs of capacity under long-term PPAs. PG&E is also the transmission provider for these facilities and two of Southern Power's other 
solar facilities. Southern Power has evaluated the recoverability of its investments in these solar facilities under various scenarios, including 

94

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

selling the related energy into the competitive markets, and has concluded they are not impaired. At December 31, 2018, Southern 
Power had outstanding accounts receivables due from PG&E of $1 million related to the PPAs and $36 million related to the transmission 
interconnections (of which $17 million is classified in other deferred charges and assets). Southern Power does not expect a material impact 
to its financial statements if, as a result of the bankruptcy proceedings, PG&E does not perform in accordance with the PPAs or the terms 
of the PPAs are renegotiated; however, the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

Fuel Costs
Fuel costs for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power are expensed as the fuel is used. Fuel expense generally 
includes fuel transportation costs and the cost of purchased emissions allowances as they are used. For Alabama Power and Georgia Power, 
fuel expense also includes the amortization of the cost of nuclear fuel. For the traditional electric operating companies, fuel costs also 
include gains and/or losses from fuel-hedging programs as approved by their respective state PSCs.

Cost of Natural Gas
Excluding Atlanta Gas Light, which does not sell natural gas to end-use customers, Southern Company Gas charges its utility customers 
for natural gas consumed using natural gas cost recovery mechanisms set by the applicable state regulatory agencies. Under these 
mechanisms, all prudently-incurred natural gas costs are passed through to customers without markup, subject to regulatory review. 
Southern Company Gas defers or accrues the difference between the actual cost of natural gas and the amount of commodity revenue 
earned in a given period such that no operating income is recognized related to these costs. The deferred or accrued amount is either billed 
or refunded to customers prospectively through adjustments to the commodity rate. Deferred and accrued natural gas costs are included in 
the balance sheets as regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities, respectively.

Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services' customers are charged for actual or estimated natural gas consumed. Within cost of natural 
gas, Southern Company Gas also includes costs of lost and unaccounted for gas, adjustments to reduce the value of inventories to market 

value, and gains and losses associated with certain derivatives.

Income Taxes
The registrants use the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provide deferred income taxes for all significant 
income tax temporary differences. In accordance with regulatory requirements, deferred federal ITCs for the traditional electric operating 
companies and Southern Company Gas are amortized over the average lives of the related property, with such amortization normally 
applied as a credit to reduce depreciation in the statements of income.

Under current tax law, certain projects at Southern Power related to the construction of renewable facilities are eligible for federal ITCs. 
Southern Power estimates eligible costs which, as they relate to acquisitions, may not be finalized until the allocation of the purchase price 
to assets has been finalized. Southern Power applies the deferred method to ITCs. Under the deferred method, the ITCs are recorded as a 
deferred credit and amortized to income tax expense over the life of the respective asset. Furthermore, the tax basis of the asset is reduced 
by 50% of the ITCs received, resulting in a net deferred tax asset. Southern Power has elected to recognize the tax benefit of this basis 
difference as a reduction to income tax expense in the year in which the plant reaches commercial operation. State ITCs are recognized as 
an income tax benefit in the period in which the credits are generated. In addition, certain projects are eligible for federal and state PTCs, 
which are recognized as an income tax benefit based on KWH production.

Federal ITCs and PTCs, as well as state ITCs and other state tax credits available to reduce income taxes payable, were not fully utilized 
in 2018 and will be carried forward and utilized in future years. In addition, Southern Company is expected to have various state net 
operating loss (NOL) carryforwards for certain of its subsidiaries, which would result in income tax benefits in the future, if utilized. 
See Note 10 under “Current and Deferred Income Taxes – Tax Credit Carryforwards” and “ – Net Operating Loss Carryforwards” for 
additional information.

The registrants recognize tax positions that are “more likely than not” of being sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing 

authorities. See Note 10 under “Unrecognized Tax Benefits” for additional information.

Other Taxes
Taxes imposed on and collected from customers on behalf of governmental agencies are presented net on the registrants' statements of 
income and are excluded from the transaction price in determining the revenue related to contracts with a customer accounted for under 
ASC 606.

Southern Company Gas is taxed on its gas revenues by various governmental authorities, but is allowed to recover these taxes from 
its customers. Revenue taxes imposed on the natural gas distribution utilities are recorded at the amount charged to customers, which 
may include a small administrative fee, as operating revenues, and the related taxes imposed on Southern Company Gas are recorded 

95

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

as operating expenses on the statements of income. Revenue taxes included in operating expenses were $111 million and $98 million 
for the successor years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, $31 million for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through 
December 31, 2016, and $56 million for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016.

Allowance for Funds Used During Construction and Interest Capitalized
The traditional electric operating companies and certain of the natural gas distribution utilities (Atlanta Gas Light, Chattanooga Gas, 

and Nicor Gas) record AFUDC, which represents the estimated debt and equity costs of capital funds that are necessary to finance the 

construction of new regulated facilities. While cash is not realized currently, AFUDC increases the revenue requirement and is recovered over 

the service life of the asset through a higher rate base and higher depreciation. The equity component of AFUDC is not taxable.

Interest related to the construction of new facilities at Southern Power and new facilities not included in the traditional electric operating 

companies' and Southern Company Gas' regulated rates is capitalized in accordance with standard interest capitalization requirements.

Total AFUDC and interest capitalized for the registrants in 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:

2018
2017
2016

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

$210
249
327

$84
54
39

Georgia  
Power(a)

(in millions)

$94
63
68

Mississippi  
Power(b)

Southern
Power

$ —
72
124

$17
11
44

(a)  See Note 2 under “Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction” for information on the inclusion of a portion of construction costs related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 

and 4 in Georgia Power's rate base.

(b)  Mississippi Power's decrease in 2017 resulted from the Kemper IGCC project suspension in June 2017.

Year Ended 
December 31, 2018

Southern Company Gas

$14

Successor

Year Ended 
December 31, 2017

(in millions)

$19

July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016

$6

Predecessor

January 1, 
2016 through
June 30, 2016

(in millions)
$4

The average AFUDC composite rates for 2018, 2017, and 2016 for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas 
were as follows:

2018
2017
2016

Southern Company Gas:

Atlanta Gas Light(a)
Chattanooga Gas(a)
Nicor Gas(b)

Alabama 
Power

8.3%
8.3%
8.2%

Georgia  
Power

7.3%
5.6%
6.9%

Year Ended 
December 31, 
2018

7.9%
7.4%
2.1%

Successor

Year Ended 
December 31, 
2017

8.1%
7.4%
1.2%

July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 
2016

4.1%
3.7%
1.5%

Mississippi  
Power

3.3%
6.7%
6.5%

Predecessor

January 1, 
2016 through
June 30, 2016

4.1%
3.7%
1.5%

(a)  Fixed rates authorized by the Georgia PSC and Tennessee Public Utilities Commission for Atlanta Gas Light and Chattanooga Gas, respectively.
(b)  Variable rate determined by the FERC method of AFUDC accounting.

96

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The registrants evaluate long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances 

indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based 

on either a specific regulatory disallowance, a sales transaction price that is less than the asset group's carrying value, or an estimate of 

undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the asset group, as compared with the carrying value of the assets. If an impairment has 

occurred, the amount of the impairment recognized is determined by either the amount of regulatory disallowance or by estimating the 

fair value of the assets and recording a loss if the carrying value is greater than the fair value. For assets identified as held for sale, the 

carrying value is compared to the estimated fair value less the cost to sell in order to determine if an impairment loss is required. Until 

the assets are disposed of, their estimated fair value is re-evaluated when circumstances or events change. See Note 15 under “Southern 

Power” for information regarding impairment charges recorded in 2018. Also see “Revenues” and “Leveraged Leases” herein and Note 3 

under “Other Matters – Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities
Southern Power's intangible assets consist primarily of certain PPAs acquired, which are amortized over the term of the respective PPA. 

Southern Company Gas' goodwill and other intangible assets and liabilities primarily relate to its 2016 acquisition by Southern Company. 

In addition to these items, Southern Company's goodwill and other intangible assets also relate to its 2016 acquisition of PowerSecure. 

See Note 15 under “Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas” and “Southern Company Acquisition of PowerSecure” for 

additional information.

Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to an annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if 

impairment indicators arise. Southern Company Gas recorded a goodwill impairment charge in the first quarter 2018 related to its 

disposition of Pivotal Home Solutions. Southern Company and Southern Company Gas each evaluated its goodwill in the fourth quarter 

2018 and determined no additional impairment was required. The following table presents 2018 changes in goodwill balances for Southern 

Company and Southern Company Gas:

Balance at December 31, 2017
Impairment(a)
Dispositions(b)
Balance at December 31, 2018

Southern 
Company

$ 6,268
(42)
(910)
$ 5,315(c)

Southern Company Gas

Gas 
Distribution 
Operations

(in millions)
$4,702
—
(668)
$4,034

Gas 
Marketing 
Services

$1,265
(42)
(242)
$ 981

(a)  On April 11, 2018, Southern Company Gas entered into a stock purchase agreement for the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. In contemplation of this 
transaction and based on the purchase price, a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded in the first quarter 2018. See Note 15 under 
“Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

(b)  Gas distribution operations reflects goodwill allocated to Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, and Florida City Gas, which were sold during the third quarter 
2018. Gas marketing services reflects goodwill associated with Pivotal Home Solutions, which was sold on June 4, 2018. See Note 15 under “Southern 
Company Gas” for additional information.

(c)  Total does not add due to rounding.

97

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, other intangible assets were as follows:

Southern Company

Other intangible assets subject 

to amortization:
Customer relationships(a)
Trade names(a)
Storage and transportation contracts
PPA fair value adjustments(b)
Other

Total other intangible assets subject to 

amortization

Other intangible assets not subject 

to amortization:
Federal Communications Commission licenses

Total other intangible assets

Southern Power

Other intangible assets subject  

to amortization:
PPA fair value adjustments(b)

Southern Company Gas

Other intangible assets subject  

to amortization:
Gas marketing services(a)

Customer relationships
Trade names

Wholesale gas services

Storage and transportation contracts

Total other intangible assets subject 

At December 31, 2018

At December 31, 2017

Gross 
Carrying 
Amount

Accumulated 
Amortization

(in millions)

Other 
Intangible 
Assets, Net

Gross  
Carrying 
Amount

Accumulated 
Amortization

(in millions)

Other 
Intangible 
Assets, Net

$223
70
64
405
11

$773

75
$848

$ (94)
(21)
(54)
(61)
(5)

$129
49
10
344
6

$ 288
159
64
456
17

$ (83)
(17)
(34)
(47)
(5)

$205
142
30
409
12

$ (235)

$538

$ 984

$(186)

$798

—
$ (235)

75
$613

75
$1,059

—
$(186)

75
$873

$405

$ (61)

$344

$ 456

$ (47)

$409

$156
26

64

$ (84)
(7)

$ 72
19

$ 221
115

$ (77)
(9)

$144
106

(54)

10

64

(34)

30

to amortization

$246

$ (145)

$101

$ 400

$(120)

$280

(a)  Balances as of December 31, 2018 reflect the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. See Note 15 under “Southern Company Gas – Sale of Pivotal Home Solutions” 

for additional information.

(b)  Balances as of December 31, 2018 exclude Plant Mankato-related intangible assets that were reclassified as assets held for sale. See Note 15 under 

“Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants” for additional information.

98

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Amortization associated with other intangible assets in 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:

Southern Company
Southern Power

2018

$89
$25

2017
(in millions)

$124
$ 25

2016

$50
$10

Year Ended 
December 31, 2018

Successor

Year Ended 
December 31, 2017

(in millions)

July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 
2016

Southern Company Gas:

Wholesale gas services(a)
Gas marketing services(b)

(a)  Recorded as a reduction to operating revenues.
(b)  Included in depreciation and amortization.

$20
32

$32
54

$ 2
32

Predecessor

January 1, 
2016 through
June 30, 2016

(in millions)

$—
8

At December 31, 2018, the estimated amortization associated with other intangible assets for the next five years is as follows:

Southern Company(*)
Southern Power(*)
Southern Company Gas

2019

2020

$61
20
29

$50
20
19

2021
(in millions)

$43
20
13

2022

2023

$39
20
10

$38
20
9

(*)  Excludes amounts related to held for sale assets. See Note 15 under “Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants” for additional information.

Included in other deferred credits and liabilities on the balance sheet is $91 million of intangible liabilities that were recorded during 

acquisition accounting for transportation contracts at Southern Company Gas. At December 31, 2018, the accumulated amortization of 

these intangible liabilities was $74 million. In 2019, the remaining $17 million of amortization associated with the intangible liabilities will 

be recorded in natural gas revenues.

Acquisition Accounting
At the time of an acquisition, management will assess whether acquired assets and activities meet the definition of a business. For 

acquisitions that meet the definition of a business, operating results from the date of acquisition are included in the acquiring entity's 

financial statements. The purchase price, including any contingent consideration, is allocated based on the fair value of the identifiable 

assets acquired and liabilities assumed (including any intangible assets). Assets acquired that do not meet the definition of a business are 

accounted for as an asset acquisition.

The purchase price of each asset acquisition is allocated based on the relative fair value of assets acquired. Determining the fair value of 

assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management judgment and management may engage independent valuation experts to 

assist in this process. Fair values are determined by using market participant assumptions and typically include the timing and amounts of 

future cash flows, incurred construction costs, the nature of acquired contracts, discount rates, power market prices, and expected asset 

lives. Any due diligence or transition costs incurred for potential or successful acquisitions are expensed as incurred.

Historically, contingent consideration primarily relates to fixed amounts due to the seller once an acquired construction project is placed in 

service. For contingent consideration with variable payments, management fair values the arrangement with any changes recorded in the 

statements of income. See Note 13 for additional fair value information.

99

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Development Costs
For Southern Power, development costs are capitalized once a project is probable of completion, primarily based on a review of its 

economics and operational feasibility, as well as status of power off-take agreements and regulatory approvals, if applicable. Southern 

Power's capitalized development costs are included in CWIP on the balance sheets. All of Southern Power's development costs incurred 

prior to the determination that a project is probable of completion are expensed as incurred and included in other operations and 

maintenance expense in the statements of income. If it is determined that a project is no longer probable of completion, any of Southern 

Power's capitalized development costs are expensed and included in other operations and maintenance expense in the statements 

of income.

Long-Term Service Agreements
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power have entered into LTSAs for the purpose of securing maintenance support 

for certain of their generating facilities. The LTSAs cover all planned inspections on the covered equipment, which generally includes the 

cost of all labor and materials. The LTSAs also obligate the counterparties to cover the costs of unplanned maintenance on the covered 

equipment subject to limits and scope specified in each contract.

Payments made under the LTSAs for the performance of any planned inspections or unplanned capital maintenance are recorded in the 

statements of cash flows as investing activities. Receipts of major parts into materials and supplies inventory prior to planned inspections 

are treated as noncash transactions in the statements of cash flows. Any payments made prior to the work being performed are recorded 

as prepayments in other current assets and noncurrent assets on the balance sheets. At the time work is performed, an appropriate amount 

is accrued for future payments or transferred from the prepayment and recorded as property, plant, and equipment or expensed.

Transmission Receivables/Prepayments
As a result of Southern Power's acquisition and construction of generating facilities, Southern Power has transmission receivables and/or 

prepayments representing the portion of interconnection network and transmission upgrades that will be reimbursed to Southern Power. 

Upon completion of the related project, transmission costs are generally reimbursed by the interconnection provider within a five-year 

period and the receivable/prepayments are reduced as payments or services are received.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the financial statements, temporary cash investments are considered cash equivalents. Temporary cash investments are 

securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.

Restricted Cash
The registrants adopted ASU 2016-18 as of January 1, 2018. See “Recently Adopted Accounting Standards – Other” herein for 

additional information.

At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had restricted cash related to the redemption of pollution control revenue bonds, which were 

redeemed subsequent to December 31, 2018. See Note 8 under “Long-term Debt – Pollution Control Revenue Bonds” for additional 

information. At December 31, 2017, Southern Power had restricted cash primarily related to certain acquisitions and construction projects. 

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Southern Company Gas had restricted cash held as collateral for worker’s compensation, life insurance, 

and long-term disability insurance.

100

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

The following tables provide a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the balance sheets that total to 

the amounts shown in the statements of cash flows for the registrants that had restricted cash at December 31, 2018 and/or 2017:

At December 31, 2018

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents classified as assets held for sale
Restricted cash:
Restricted cash
Other accounts and notes receivable

Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

At December 31, 2017

Cash and cash equivalents

Restricted cash:

Other accounts and notes receivable
Deferred charges and other assets

Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

Southern
Company

$ 1,396

9

—
114
$ 1,519

Southern 
Company

$2,130

5
12
$2,147

Georgia
Power

(in millions)

Southern
Company Gas

$ 4

—

108
—
$112

$64

—

—
6
$70

Southern 
Power

(in millions)

Southern
Company Gas

$129

—
11
$140

$73

5
—
$78

Storm Damage Reserves
Each traditional electric operating company maintains a reserve to cover or is allowed to defer and recover the cost of damages from major 

storms to its transmission and distribution lines and, for Mississippi Power, the cost of uninsured damages to its generation facilities and 

other property. In accordance with their respective state PSC orders, the traditional electric operating companies accrued the following 

amounts related to storm damage reserves in 2018, 2017, and 2016:

2018
2017
2016

Southern
Company(*)

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

$74
41
40

(in millions)

$16
4
3

$30
30
30

$ 1
3
4

(*)  Includes accruals at Gulf Power of $26.9 million in 2018 and $3.5 million in each of 2017 and 2016. See Note 15 under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf 

Power” for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.

Alabama Power and Mississippi Power also have authority based on orders from their state PSCs to accrue certain additional amounts as 

circumstances warrant. There were no such additional accruals for Alabama Power and Mississippi Power in any year presented.

See Note 2 under “Alabama Power – Rate NDR,” “Georgia Power – Storm Damage Recovery,” and “Mississippi Power – System Restoration 

Rider” for additional information regarding each company’s storm damage reserve.

Leveraged Leases
A subsidiary of Southern Holdings has several leveraged lease agreements, with original terms ranging up to 45 years, which relate to 

international and domestic energy generation, distribution, and transportation assets. Southern Company receives federal income tax 

deductions for depreciation and amortization, as well as interest on long-term debt related to these investments. Southern Company 

reviews all important lease assumptions at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that a change 

in assumptions has occurred or may occur. These assumptions include the effective tax rate, the residual value, the credit quality of the 

lessees, and the timing of expected tax cash flows.

The ability of the lessees to make required payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary is dependent on the operational performance 

of the assets. In 2017, the financial and operational performance of one of the lessees and the associated generation assets raised 

significant concerns about the short-term ability of the generation assets to produce cash flows sufficient to support ongoing operations 

101

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

and the lessee’s contractual obligations and its ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments to the Southern Holdings 

subsidiary beginning in June 2018. As a result of operational improvements in 2018, the 2018 lease payments were paid in full. However, 

operational issues and the resulting cash liquidity challenges persist and significant concerns continue regarding the lessee’s ability to 

make the remaining semi-annual lease payments. These operational challenges may also impact the expected residual value of the assets 

at the end of the lease term in 2047. If any future lease payment is not paid in full, the Southern Holdings subsidiary may be unable to 

make its corresponding payment to the holders of the underlying non-recourse debt related to the generation assets. Failure to make 

the required payment to the debtholders could represent an event of default that would give the debtholders the right to foreclose on, 

and take ownership of, the generation assets from the Southern Holdings subsidiary, in effect terminating the lease and resulting in the 

write-off of the related lease receivable, which would result in a reduction in net income of approximately $86 million after tax based on 

the lease receivable balance at December 31, 2018. Southern Company has evaluated the recoverability of the lease receivable and the 

expected residual value of the generation assets at the end of the lease under various scenarios and has concluded that its investment in 

the leveraged lease is not impaired at December 31, 2018. Southern Company will continue to monitor the operational performance of 

the underlying assets and evaluate the ability of the lessee to continue to make the required lease payments. The ultimate outcome of this 

matter cannot be determined at this time.

Southern Company’s net investment in domestic and international leveraged leases consists of the following at December 31:

Net rentals receivable
Unearned income
Investment in leveraged leases
Deferred taxes from leveraged leases
Net investment in leveraged leases

A summary of the components of income from the leveraged leases follows:

Pretax leveraged lease income
Net impact of Tax Reform Legislation
Income tax expense
Net leveraged lease income

2018

2017

(in millions)

$1,563
(765)
798
(255)
$ 543

2017
(in millions)

$25
48
(9)
$64

$1,498
(723)
775
(252)
$ 523

2016

$25
—
(9)
$16

2018

$25
—
(6)
$19

Materials and Supplies
Materials and supplies for the traditional electric operating companies generally includes the average cost of transmission, distribution, and 

generating plant materials. Materials and supplies for Southern Company Gas generally includes propane gas inventory, fleet fuel, and other 

materials and supplies. Materials and supplies for Southern Power generally includes the average cost of generating plant materials.

Materials are recorded to inventory when purchased and then expensed or capitalized to property, plant, and equipment, as appropriate, at 

weighted average cost when installed. In addition, certain major parts are recorded as inventory when acquired and then capitalized at cost 

when installed to property, plant, and equipment.

Fuel Inventory
Fuel inventory for the traditional electric operating companies includes the average cost of coal, natural gas, oil, transportation, and 

emissions allowances. Fuel inventory for Southern Power, which is included in other current assets, includes the average cost of oil, natural 

gas, biomass, and emissions allowances. Fuel is recorded to inventory when purchased and then expensed, at weighted average cost, as 

used. Emissions allowances granted by the EPA are included in inventory at zero cost. The traditional electric operating companies recover 

fuel expense through fuel cost recovery rates approved by each state PSC or, for wholesale rates, the FERC.

Natural Gas for Sale
With the exception of Nicor Gas, the natural gas distribution utilities record natural gas inventories on a WACOG basis. In Georgia’s 

deregulated, competitive environment, Marketers sell natural gas to firm end-use customers at market-based prices. On a monthly basis, 

Atlanta Gas Light assigns to Marketers the majority of the pipeline storage services that it has under contract, along with a corresponding 

amount of inventory. Atlanta Gas Light retains and manages a portion of its pipeline storage assets and related natural gas inventories for 

system balancing and to serve system demand.

102

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Nicor Gas’ natural gas inventory is carried at cost on a LIFO basis. Inventory decrements occurring during the year that are restored prior 

to year end are charged to cost of natural gas at the estimated annual replacement cost. Inventory decrements that are not restored prior 

to year end are charged to cost of natural gas at the actual LIFO cost of the inventory layers liquidated. The cost of natural gas, including 

inventory costs, is recovered from customers under a purchased gas recovery mechanism adjusted for differences between actual costs and 

amounts billed; therefore, LIFO liquidations have no impact on Southern Company’s or Southern Company Gas’ net income. At December 

31, 2018, the Nicor Gas LIFO inventory balance was $165 million. Based on the average cost of gas purchased in December 2018, the 

estimated replacement cost of Nicor Gas’ inventory at December 31, 2018 was $409 million. During 2018, Nicor Gas did not liquidate any 

LIFO-based inventory.

Southern Company Gas’ gas marketing services, wholesale gas services, and all other segments record inventory at LOCOM, with cost 

determined on a WACOG basis. For these segments, Southern Company Gas evaluates the weighted average cost of its natural gas 

inventories against market prices to determine whether any declines in market prices below the WACOG are other than temporary. For any 

declines considered to be other than temporary, Southern Company Gas recorded LOCOM adjustments to cost of natural gas to reduce 

the value of its natural gas inventories to market value. LOCOM adjustments were $10 million during 2018 for wholesale gas services and 

immaterial for all other periods presented.

Energy Marketing Receivables and Payables
Southern Company Gas’ wholesale gas services provides services to retail gas marketers, wholesale gas marketers, utility companies, and 

industrial customers. These counterparties utilize netting agreements that enable wholesale gas services to net receivables and payables 

by counterparty upon settlement. Southern Company Gas’ wholesale gas services also nets across product lines and against cash collateral, 

provided the netting and cash collateral agreements include such provisions. While the amounts due from, or owed to, wholesale gas 

services’ counterparties are settled net, they are recorded on a gross basis in the balance sheets as energy marketing receivables and energy 

marketing payables.

Southern Company Gas’ wholesale gas services has trade and credit contracts that contain minimum credit rating requirements. These 

credit rating requirements typically give counterparties the right to suspend or terminate credit if Southern Company Gas’ credit ratings 

are downgraded to non-investment grade status. Under such circumstances, Southern Company Gas’ wholesale gas services would need to 

post collateral to continue transacting business with some of its counterparties. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the required collateral 

in the event of a credit rating downgrade was $30 million and $8 million, respectively.

Credit policies were established to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties, including requirements to post collateral 

or other credit security, as well as the quality of pledged collateral. Collateral or credit security is most often in the form of cash or 

letters of credit from an investment-grade financial institution, but may also include cash or U.S. government securities held by a trustee. 

When Southern Company Gas’ wholesale gas services is engaged in more than one outstanding derivative transaction with the same 

counterparty and it also has a legally enforceable netting agreement with that counterparty, the “net” mark-to-market exposure represents 

the netting of the positive and negative exposures with that counterparty combined with a reasonable measure of Southern Company 

Gas’ credit risk. Southern Company Gas’ wholesale gas services also uses other netting agreements with certain counterparties with whom 

it conducts significant transactions.

See “Concentration of Credit Risk” herein for additional information.

Provision for Uncollectible Accounts
The customers of the traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities are billed monthly. For the majority 

of receivables, a provision for uncollectible accounts is established based on historical collection experience and other factors. For the 

remaining receivables, if the company is aware of a specific customer’s inability to pay, a provision for uncollectible accounts is recorded 

to reduce the receivable balance to the amount reasonably expected to be collected. If circumstances change, the estimate of the 

recoverability of accounts receivable could change as well. Circumstances that could affect this estimate include, but are not limited to, 

customer credit issues, customer deposits, and general economic conditions. Customers’ accounts are written off once they are deemed to 

be uncollectible. For all periods presented, uncollectible accounts averaged less than 1% of revenues for each registrant.

Credit risk exposure at Nicor Gas is mitigated by a bad debt rider approved by the Illinois Commission. The bad debt rider provides for 

the recovery from (or refund to) customers of the difference between Nicor Gas’ actual bad debt experience on an annual basis and the 

benchmark bad debt expense used to establish its base rates for the respective year.

103

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Concentration of Credit Risk
Southern Company Gas’ wholesale gas services business has a concentration of credit risk for services it provides to its counterparties. 

This credit risk is generally concentrated in 20 of its counterparties and is measured by 30-day receivable exposure plus forward exposure. 

Counterparty credit risk is evaluated using a S&P equivalent credit rating, which is determined by a process of converting the lower of the 

S&P or Moody’s rating to an internal rating ranging from 9 to 1, with 9 being equivalent to AAA/Aaa by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, 

and 1 being equivalent to D/Default by S&P and Moody’s, respectively. A counterparty that does not have an external rating is assigned 

an internal rating based on the strength of its financial ratios. As of December 31, 2018, the top 20 counterparties represented 48%, or 

$298 million, of the total counterparty exposure and had a weighted average S&P equivalent rating of A-.

Concentration of credit risk occurs at Atlanta Gas Light for amounts billed for services and other costs to its customers, which consist of 

15 Marketers in Georgia (including SouthStar). The credit risk exposure to Marketers varies seasonally, with the lowest exposure in the non-

peak summer months and the highest exposure in the peak winter months. Marketers are responsible for the retail sale of natural gas to 

end-use customers in Georgia. The functions of the retail sale of gas include the purchase and sale of natural gas, customer service, billings, 

and collections. The provisions of Atlanta Gas Light’s tariff allow Atlanta Gas Light to obtain credit security support in an amount equal to 

a minimum of two times a Marketer’s highest month’s estimated bill from Atlanta Gas Light.

Financial Instruments
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power use derivative financial instruments to limit exposure to fluctuations 

in interest rates, the prices of certain fuel purchases, electricity purchases and sales, and occasionally foreign currency exchange rates. 

Southern Company Gas uses derivative financial instruments to limit exposure to fluctuations in natural gas prices, weather, interest rates, 

and commodity prices. All derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheets (included 

in “Other” or shown separately as “Risk Management Activities”) and are measured at fair value. See Note 13 for additional information 

regarding fair value. Substantially all of the traditional electric operating companies’ and Southern Power’s bulk energy purchases and 

sales contracts that meet the definition of a derivative are excluded from fair value accounting requirements because they qualify for 

the “normal” scope exception, and are accounted for under the accrual method. Derivative contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges of 

anticipated transactions or are recoverable through the traditional electric operating companies’ and the natural gas distribution utilities’ 

fuel-hedging programs result in the deferral of related gains and losses in AOCI or regulatory assets and liabilities, respectively, until the 

hedged transactions occur. For 2017 and 2016, ineffectiveness arising from cash flow hedges was recognized in net income. Upon the 

adoption of ASU 2017-12 in 2018, ineffectiveness is no longer separately measured and recorded in earnings. See “Recently Adopted 

Accounting Standards” herein for additional information. Other derivative contracts that qualify as fair value hedges are marked to market 

through current period income and are recorded on a net basis in the statements of income. Cash flows from derivatives are classified on 

the statements of cash flows in the same category as the hedged item. See Note 14 for additional information regarding derivatives.

The registrants offset fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under 

netting arrangements. The registrants had no outstanding collateral repayment obligations or rights to reclaim collateral arising from 

derivative instruments recognized at December 31, 2018.

The registrants are exposed to potential losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties’ nonperformance. The 

registrants have established risk management policies and controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in 

order to mitigate their exposure to counterparty credit risk.

Southern Company Gas
Southern Company Gas enters into weather derivative contracts as economic hedges of natural gas revenues in the event of warmer-than-

normal weather in the Heating Season. Exchange-traded options are carried at fair value, with changes reflected in natural gas revenues. 

Non-exchange-traded options are accounted for using the intrinsic value method. Changes in the intrinsic value for non-exchange-traded 

contracts are also reflected in natural gas revenues in the statements of income.

Wholesale gas services purchases natural gas for storage when the current market price paid to buy and transport natural gas plus the 

cost to store and finance the natural gas is less than the market price that can be received in the future, resulting in positive net natural 

gas revenues. NYMEX futures and OTC contracts are used to sell natural gas at that future price to substantially protect the natural 

gas revenues that will ultimately be realized when the stored natural gas is sold. Southern Company Gas enters into transactions to 

secure transportation capacity between delivery points in order to serve its customers and various markets. NYMEX futures and OTC 

contracts are used to capture the price differential or spread between the locations served by the capacity in order to substantially 

protect the natural gas revenues that will ultimately be realized when the physical flow of natural gas between delivery points occurs. 

These contracts generally meet the definition of derivatives and are carried at fair value on the balance sheets, with changes in fair value 

recorded in natural gas revenues on the statements of income in the period of change. These contracts are not designated as hedges for 
accounting purposes.

104

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

The purchase, transportation, storage, and sale of natural gas are accounted for on a weighted average cost or accrual basis, as appropriate, 

rather than on the fair value basis utilized for the derivatives used to mitigate the natural gas price risk associated with the storage and 

transportation portfolio. Monthly demand charges are incurred for the contracted storage and transportation capacity and payments 

associated with asset management agreements, and these demand charges and payments are recognized on the statements of income in 

the period they are incurred. This difference in accounting methods can result in volatility in reported earnings, even though the economic 

margin is substantially unchanged from the dates the transactions were consummated.

Comprehensive Income
The objective of comprehensive income is to report a measure of all changes in common stock equity of an enterprise that result from 

transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with owners. Comprehensive income consists of net income 

attributable to the registrant, changes in the fair value of qualifying cash flow hedges, and reclassifications for amounts included in net 

income. Comprehensive income also consists of certain changes in pension and other postretirement benefit plans for Southern Company, 

Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas.

AOCI (loss) balances, net of tax effects, for Southern Company, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas were as follows:

Southern Company
Balance at December 31, 2017
Adjustment to beginning balance(*)
Current period change
Balance at December 31, 2018

Southern Power
Balance at December 31, 2017
Adjustment to beginning balance(*)
Current period change
Balance at December 31, 2018

Southern Company Gas
Balance at December 31, 2017
Adjustment to beginning balance(*)
Current period change
Balance at December 31, 2018

Qualifying
Hedges

Pension and 
Other
Postretirement
Benefit Plans

(in millions)

Accumulated 
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

$ (119)
(26)
24
$ (121)

$ 25
4
7
$ 36

$

$

(6)
(1)
4
(3)

$(70)
(14)
2
$(82)

$(27)
—
7
$(20)

$ 26
5
(2)
$ 29

$ (189)
(40)
26
$ (203)

$

(2)
4
14
$ 16

$ 20
4
2
$ 26

(*)  Reflects the reclassification related to stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation as allowed by ASU 2018-02. See “Recently Adopted 

Accounting Standards – Other” herein for additional information.

Variable Interest Entities
The primary beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE when it has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most 

significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that 

could potentially be significant to the VIE. See Note 7 for additional information regarding VIEs.

Alabama Power has established a wholly-owned trust to issue preferred securities. See Note 8 under “Long-term Debt – Other Long-

Term Debt – Alabama Power” for additional information. However, Alabama Power is not considered the primary beneficiary of the trust. 

Therefore, the investment in the trust is reflected as other investments, and the related loan from the trust is reflected as long-term debt in 

Alabama Power’s balance sheets.

105

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

NOTE 2. REGULATORY MATTERS

Southern Company

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the consolidated balance sheets of Southern Company at December 31, 2018 and 2017 

relate to:

Retiree benefit plans
Asset retirement obligations-asset
Deferred income tax charges
Property damage reserves-asset
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues
Environmental remediation-asset
Loss on reacquired debt
Remaining net book value of retired assets
Vacation pay
Long-term debt fair value adjustment
Deferred PPA charges
Other regulatory assets
Deferred income tax credits
Other cost of removal obligations
Customer refunds
Property damage reserves-liability
Over recovered regulatory clause revenues
Other regulatory liabilities
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net

2018

$ 3,658
2,933
799
416
407
366
346
211
182
121
—
581
(6,455)
(2,297)
(293)
(76)
(47)
(132)
720

$

2017

(in millions)

$ 3,931
1,133
814
333
317
511
223
306
183
138
119
625
(7,261)
(2,684)
(188)
(135)
(155)
(104)
$(1,894)

Note

(a,p)
(b,p)
(b,o)
(c)
(d)
(e,p)
(f)
(g)
(h,p)
(i)
(j,p)
(k)
(b,o)
(b)
(n)
(l)
(d)
(m)

Note: Unless otherwise noted, the recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) are approved by the respective PSC or 
regulatory agency and are as follows:

(a)  Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which may range up to 15 years. See Note 11 for additional information.
(b)  Asset retirement and other cost of removal obligations are recorded, deferred income tax assets are recovered, and deferred income tax liabilities are 

amortized over the related property lives, which may range up to 80 years. Asset retirement and removal liabilities will be settled and trued up following 
completion of the related activities. Included in the deferred income tax assets is $28 million for the retiree Medicare drug subsidy, which is being recovered 
and amortized through 2027.

(c)  Through 2019, Georgia Power is recovering approximately $30 million annually for storm damage, which is expected to be adjusted in the Georgia Power 

2019 Base Rate Case. See “Georgia Power – Storm Damage Recovery” herein for additional information.

(d)  Recorded and recovered or amortized over periods generally not exceeding 10 years.
(e)  Recovered through environmental cost recovery mechanisms when the remediation is performed or the work is performed.
(f)  Recovered over either the remaining life of the original issue or, if refinanced, over the remaining life of the new issue, which may range up to 50 years.
(g)  Amortized over periods not exceeding eight years.
(h)  Recorded as earned by employees and recovered as paid, generally within one year. This includes both vacation and banked holiday pay.
(i)  Recovered over the remaining life of the original debt issuances, which range up to 20 years. For additional information see Note 15 under “Southern 

Company Merger with Southern Company Gas.”

(j)  Related to Gulf Power and reclassified as assets held for sale at December 31, 2018. See Note 15 under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” for 

information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.

(k)  Comprised of numerous immaterial components including nuclear outage, fuel-hedging losses, cancelled construction projects, building and generating plant 
leases, property tax, and other miscellaneous assets. These costs are recorded and recovered or amortized over periods generally not exceeding 50 years.

(l)  Amortized as storm restoration and potential reliability-related expenses are incurred.
(m) Comprised of numerous components including retiree benefit plans, fuel-hedging gains, AROs, and other liabilities that are recorded and recovered or 

amortized over periods not exceeding 20 years.

(n)  At December 31, 2018, represents amounts accrued and outstanding for refund, including approximately $109 million as a result of Alabama Power’s 2018 
retail return exceeding the allowed range, approximately $55 million pursuant to the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, and approximately 
$100 million, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC, as a result of Georgia Power’s 2018 retail ROE exceeding the allowed retail ROE range. See 
“Alabama Power – Rate RSE” and “Georgia Power – Rate Plans” herein for additional information.

(o)  As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, these accounts include certain deferred income tax assets and liabilities not subject to normalization. The recovery 
and amortization of these amounts will be determined in future rate proceedings. See “Georgia Power,” “Mississippi Power,” and “Southern Company Gas” 
herein and Note 10 for additional information.

(p)  Not earning a return as offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.

106

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Gulf Power
On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 under “Southern Company’s Sale 

of Gulf Power” for additional information.

In accordance with a Florida PSC-approved settlement agreement, Gulf Power’s rates effective for the first billing cycle in July 2017 

increased by approximately $54 million annually (2017 Gulf Power Rate Case Settlement), including a $62 million increase in base revenues, 

less an $8 million purchased power capacity cost recovery clause credit. The 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement also resulted in a 

$32.5 million write-down of Gulf Power’s ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3, which was recorded in the first quarter 2017.

As a continuation of the 2017 Gulf Power Rate Case Settlement Agreement, on March 26, 2018, the Florida PSC approved a stipulation and 

settlement agreement addressing Gulf Power’s retail revenue requirement effects of the Tax Reform Legislation (Gulf Power Tax Reform 

Settlement Agreement). Beginning in April 1, 2018, the Gulf Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement resulted in annual reductions of 

approximately $18 million to Gulf Power’s base rates and approximately $16 million to Gulf Power’s environmental cost recovery rates and 

a one-time refund of approximately $69 million for the retail portion of unprotected (not subject to normalization) deferred tax liabilities, 

which was credited to customers through Gulf Power’s fuel cost recovery rates over the remainder of 2018.

Alabama Power

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the balance sheets of Alabama Power at December 31, 2018 and 2017 relate to:

Retiree benefit plans
Deferred income tax charges
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues
Asset retirement obligations
Regulatory clauses
Vacation pay
Loss on reacquired debt
Nuclear outage
Remaining net book value of retired assets
Other regulatory assets
Deferred income tax credits
Other cost of removal obligations
Rate RSE refund
Natural disaster reserve
Other regulatory liabilities
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net

2018

$

947
241
176
147
142
71
56
49
43
57
(2,027)
(497)
(109)
(20)
(45)
$ (769)

2017

(in millions)

$ 946
240
53
(33)
142
70
62
56
54
58
(2,082)
(609)
—
(38)
(7)
$(1,088)

Note

(a,p)
(b,c,d,)
(e)
(b)
(f)
(g,p)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k,l)
(b,d)
(b)
(m)
(n)
(l,o)

Note: Unless otherwise noted, the recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) have been accepted or approved by the 
Alabama PSC and are as follows:
(a)  Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which may range up to 15 years. See Note 11 for additional information.
(b)  Asset retirement and removal assets and liabilities are recorded, deferred income tax assets are recovered, and deferred income tax credits are amortized 
over the related property lives, which may range up to 50 years. Asset retirement and other cost of removal assets and liabilities will be settled and trued 
up following completion of the related activities.

(c)  Included in the deferred income tax charges are $10 million for 2018 and $13 million for 2017 for the retiree Medicare drug subsidy, which is being 

recovered and amortized through 2027.

(d)  As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, these accounts include certain deferred income tax assets and liabilities not subject to normalization. The 
recovery and amortization of these amounts will occur ratably over the related property lives, which may range up to 50 years. See Note 10 for 
additional information.

(e)  Recorded and recovered or amortized over periods not exceeding 10 years. See “Rate CNP PPA,” “Rate CNP Compliance,” and” Rate ECR” herein for 

additional information.

(f)  Will be amortized concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power’s next depreciation study. See “Rate RSE” herein for additional information.
(g)  Recorded as earned by employees and recovered as paid, generally within one year. This includes both vacation and banked holiday pay.
(h)  Recovered over the remaining life of the original issue, which may range up to 50 years.
(i)  Nuclear outage costs are deferred to a regulatory asset when incurred and amortized over a subsequent 18-month period.
(j)  Recorded and amortized over remaining periods up to 8 years.
(k)  Comprised of components including generation site selection/evaluation costs, PPA capacity (to be recovered over the next 12 months), and other 

miscellaneous assets. Capitalized upon initialization of related construction projects, if applicable.

107

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

(l)  Fuel-hedging assets and liabilities are recorded over the life of the underlying hedged purchase contracts, which generally do not exceed three and a half 

years. Upon final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered through the energy cost recovery clause.

(m) Refund accrued as a result of the 2018 retail return exceeding the allowed range. See “Rate RSE” herein for additional information.
(n)  Amortized as storm restoration and potential reliability-related expenses are incurred.
(o)  Comprised of several components, primarily $33 million deferred as a result of the Alabama PSC accounting order regarding the Tax Reform Legislation. 

See “Tax Reform Accounting Order” herein for additional information.

(p)  Not earning a return as offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.

Rate RSE
The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon Alabama Power’s projected weighted 

common equity return (WCER) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on forward-looking information for the 

applicable upcoming calendar year. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged together, cannot exceed 4.0% and 

any annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. When the projected WCER is under the allowed range, there is an adjusting point of 5.98% and 

eligibility for a performance-based adder of seven basis points, or 0.07%, to the WCER adjusting point if Alabama Power (i) has an “A” 

credit rating equivalent with at least one of the recognized rating agencies or (ii) is in the top one-third of a designated customer value 

benchmark survey. If Alabama Power’s actual retail return is above the allowed WCER range, the excess will be refunded to customers 

unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is no provision for additional customer billings should the actual retail return 

fall below the WCER range. Prior to January 2019, retail rates remained unchanged when the WCER range was between 5.75% and 6.21%.

At December 31, 2016, Alabama Power’s retail return exceeded the allowed WCER range which resulted in Alabama Power establishing a 

$73 million Rate RSE refund liability. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued in February 2017, Alabama Power applied the full 

amount of the refund to reduce the under recovered balance of Rate CNP PPA as discussed further below.

Effective in January 2017, Rate RSE increased 4.48%, or $245 million annually. At December 31, 2017, Alabama Power’s actual retail return 

was within the allowed WCER range. Retail rates under Rate RSE were unchanged for 2018.

In conjunction with Rate RSE, Alabama Power has an established retail tariff that provides for an adjustment to customer billings to 

recognize the impact of a change in the statutory income tax rate. In accordance with this tariff, Alabama Power returned $267 million to 

retail customers through bill credits during 2018 as a result of the change in the federal income tax rate under the Tax Reform Legislation.

On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments designed to position Alabama Power to 

address the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation, without increasing retail rates under Rate 

RSE in the near term. Alabama Power plans to reduce growth in total debt by increasing equity, with corresponding reductions in debt 

issuances, thereby de-leveraging its capital structure. Alabama Power’s goal is to achieve an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end 

of 2025. At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power’s equity ratio was approximately 47%.

The approved modifications to Rate RSE began for billings in January 2019. The modifications include reducing the top of the allowed WCER 

range from 6.21% to 6.15% and modifications to the refund mechanism applicable to prior year actual results. The modifications to the refund 

mechanism allow Alabama Power to retain a portion of the revenue that causes the actual WCER for a given year to exceed the allowed range.

Generally, if Alabama Power’s actual WCER is between 6.15% and 7.65%, customers will receive 25% of the amount between 6.15% and 

6.65%, 40% of the amount between 6.65% and 7.15%, and 75% of the amount between 7.15% and 7.65%. Customers will receive all 

amounts in excess of an actual WCER of 7.65%.

In conjunction with these modifications to Rate RSE, on May 8, 2018, Alabama Power consented to a moratorium on any upward 

adjustments under Rate RSE for 2019 and 2020 and will also return $50 million to customers through bill credits in 2019.

On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power made its required annual Rate RSE submission to the Alabama PSC of projected data for calendar 

year 2019. Projected earnings were within the specified range; therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remain unchanged for 2019.

At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power’s retail return exceeded the allowed WCER range, which resulted in Alabama Power establishing a 

regulatory liability of $109 million for Rate RSE refunds. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama 

Power will apply $75 million to reduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance and the remaining $34 million will be refunded to customers 

through bill credits in July through September 2019.

Rate CNP PPA
Alabama Power’s retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for adjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the placing of 

new generating facilities into retail service. Alabama Power may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under Rate 

CNP PPA. No adjustments to Rate CNP PPA occurred during the period 2016 through 2018 and no adjustment is expected in 2019. 

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Alabama Power had an under recovered Rate CNP PPA balance of $25 million and $12 million, 
respectively, which is included in deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues in the balance sheet.

108

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power eliminated the under recovered 

balance in Rate CNP PPA at December 31, 2016, which totaled approximately $142 million. As discussed herein under “Rate RSE,” Alabama 

Power utilized the full amount of its $73 million Rate RSE refund liability to reduce the amount of the Rate CNP PPA under recovery and 

reclassified the remaining $69 million to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will 

begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power’s next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022. 

Alabama Power’s current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.

Rate CNP Compliance
Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of Alabama Power’s retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and other such mandates 

directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar considerations impacting 

Alabama Power’s facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information and provides for the recovery 

of these costs pursuant to a factor that is calculated annually. Compliance costs to be recovered include operations and maintenance 

expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP Compliance, as recorded on the financial 

statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in 

the billing factor will have no significant effect on Southern Company’s or Alabama Power’s revenues or net income, but will affect annual 

cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and depreciation generally will have no effect 

on Southern Company’s or Alabama Power’s net income.

In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under 

recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE 

will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power’s next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022. 

Alabama Power’s current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.

In December 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that Alabama Power leave in effect for 2018 the factors associated with 

Alabama Power’s compliance costs for the year 2017, with any under-collected amount for prior years deemed recovered before any 

current year amounts.

On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power submitted calculations associated with its cost of complying with environmental mandates, as 

provided under Rate CNP Compliance. The filing reflected a projected unrecovered retail revenue requirement for environmental compliance 

of approximately $205 million, which is being recovered in the billing months of January 2019 through December 2019.

At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power had an under recovered Rate CNP Compliance balance of $42 million, which is included in customer 

accounts receivable, and $17 million at December 31, 2017 included in deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues in the balance sheet.

Rate ECR
Alabama Power has established energy cost recovery rates under Alabama Power’s Rate ECR as approved by the Alabama PSC. Rates are 

based on an estimate of future energy costs and the current over or under recovered balance. Revenues recognized under Rate ECR and 

recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for the difference in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated 

rates. The difference in the recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed give rise to the over or under recovered amounts recorded as 

regulatory assets or liabilities. Alabama Power, along with the Alabama PSC, continually monitors the over or under recovered cost balance 

to determine whether an adjustment to billing rates is required. Changes in the Rate ECR factor have no significant effect on Southern 

Company’s or Alabama Power’s net income, but will impact operating cash flows.

In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under 

recovered balance in Rate ECR to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin 

concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power’s next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022. Alabama 

Power’s current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.

In December 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that Alabama Power leave in effect for 2018 the energy cost recovery rates 

which began in 2017.

On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an increase to Rate ECR from 2.015 cents per KWH to 2.353 cents per KWH effective 

July 2018 through December 2018. On December 4, 2018, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order to leave this rate in effect through 

December 31, 2019. This change is expected to increase collections by approximately $183 million in 2019. Absent any further order from 

the Alabama PSC, in January 2020, the rates will return to the originally authorized 5.910 cents per KWH.

As discussed herein under “Rate RSE,” in accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power will utilize 

$75 million of the 2018 Rate RSE refund liability to reduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance.

109

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power’s under recovered fuel costs totaled $109 million, of which $18 million is included in customer 
accounts receivable and $91 million is included in deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues on Southern Company’s and 
Alabama Power’s balance sheets. At December 31, 2017, Alabama Power had an under recovered fuel balance of $25 million, which was 
included in deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues on Southern Company’s and Alabama Power’s balance sheets. These 
classifications are based on estimates, which include such factors as weather, generation availability, energy demand, and the price of 
energy. A change in any of these factors could have a material impact on the timing of any recovery or return of fuel costs.

Tax Reform Accounting Order
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorized Alabama Power to defer the benefits of federal excess 
deferred income taxes associated with the Tax Reform Legislation for the year ended December 31, 2018 as a regulatory liability and to 
use up to $30 million of such deferrals to offset under recovered amounts under Rate ECR. The estimated deferrals for the year ended 
December 31, 2018 totaled approximately $63 million, subject to adjustment following the filing of the 2018 tax return, of which 
$30 million was used to offset the Rate ECR under recovered balance and $33 million is recorded in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on 
the balance sheet to be used for the benefit of customers as determined by the Alabama PSC at a future date. See Note 10 under “Current 
and Deferred Income Taxes” for additional information.

Software Accounting Order
On February 5, 2019, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorizes Alabama Power to establish a regulatory asset for 
operations and maintenance costs associated with software implementation projects. The regulatory asset will be amortized ratably over 
the life of the related software.

Rate NDR
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power maintains a reserve for operations and maintenance expenses to cover the cost 
of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. The order approves a separate monthly Rate NDR charge to 
customers consisting of two components. The first component is intended to establish and maintain a reserve balance for future storms and 
is an on-going part of customer billing. When the reserve balance falls below $50 million, a reserve establishment charge will be activated 
(and the on-going reserve maintenance charge concurrently suspended) until the reserve balance reaches $75 million. In December 2017, the 
reserve maintenance charge was suspended and the reserve establishment charge was activated as a result of the NDR balance falling below 
$50 million. Alabama Power expects to collect approximately $16 million annually until the reserve balance is restored to $75 million. The 
NDR balance at December 31, 2018 was $20 million and is included in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet.

The second component of the Rate NDR charge is intended to allow recovery of any existing deferred storm-related operations and 
maintenance costs and any future reserve deficits over a 24-month period. The Alabama PSC order gives Alabama Power authority to 
record a deficit balance in the NDR when costs of storm damage exceed any established reserve balance. Absent further Alabama PSC 
approval, the maximum total Rate NDR charge consisting of both components is $10 per month per non-residential customer account 
and $5 per month per residential customer account. Alabama Power has the authority, based on an order from the Alabama PSC, to accrue 
certain additional amounts as circumstances warrant. The order allows for reliability-related expenditures to be charged against the 
additional accruals when the NDR balance exceeds $75 million. Alabama Power may designate a portion of the NDR to reliability-related 
expenditures as a part of an annual budget process for the following year or during the current year for identified unbudgeted reliability-
related expenditures that are incurred. Accruals that have not been designated can be used to offset storm charges. Additional accruals to 
the NDR will enhance Alabama Power’s ability to deal with the financial effects of future natural disasters, promote system reliability, and 
offset costs retail customers would otherwise bear. No such accruals were recorded or designated in any period presented.

As revenue from the Rate NDR charge is recognized, an equal amount of operations and maintenance expenses related to the NDR will also 
be recognized. As a result, the Rate NDR charge will not have an effect on net income but will impact operating cash flows.

Environmental Accounting Order
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC (Environmental Accounting Order), Alabama Power is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to 
record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site 
removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset is being amortized 
and recovered over the affected unit’s remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate 
CNP Compliance. At December 31, 2018, this regulatory asset had a balance of $42 million, of which $10 million is included in other 
regulatory assets, current and $32 million is included in other regulatory assets, deferred on the balance sheet.

110

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power determined that Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 (approximately 1,000 MWs) will be 
retired by April 15, 2019 due to the expected costs of compliance with federal and state environmental regulations. In accordance with 
the Environmental Accounting Order, approximately $740 million of net investment costs will be transferred to a regulatory asset at the 
retirement date and recovered over the affected units’ remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision to retire.

Georgia Power

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the balance sheets of Georgia Power at December 31, 2018 and 2017 relate to:

Retiree benefit plans
Asset retirement obligations
Deferred income tax charges
Storm damage reserves
Remaining net book value of retired assets
Loss on reacquired debt
Vacation pay
Other cost of removal obligations
Environmental remediation
Other regulatory assets
Deferred income tax credits
Customer refunds
Other regulatory liabilities
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net

2018

$ 1,295
2,644
522
416
127
277
91
68
55
135
(3,080)
(165)
(7)
$ 2,378

2017

(in millions)

$ 1,313
945
521
333
146
127
91
40
49
106
(3,248)
(188)
(3)
232

$

Note

(a,l)
(b,l)
(b,c,l)
(d)
(e)
(f,l)
(g,l)
(b)
(h)
(i)
(b,c)
(j)
(k,l)

Note: Unless otherwise noted, the recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) are approved by the Georgia PSC and are 
as follows:
(a)  Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which may range up to 14 years. See Note 11 for additional information.
(b)  Through 2019, Georgia Power is recovering approximately $60 million annually for AROs, which is expected to be adjusted in the Georgia Power 2019 Base 
Rate Case. Asset retirement and removal liabilities will be settled and trued up following completion of the related activities. See Note 6 for additional 
information on AROs. Other cost of removal obligations and deferred income tax assets are recovered and deferred income tax liabilities are amortized over 
the related property lives, which may range up to 65 years. Included in the deferred income tax assets is $17 million for the retiree Medicare drug subsidy, 
which is being recovered and amortized through 2022.

(c)  As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, these balances include $145 million of deferred income tax assets related to CWIP for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 

4 and approximately $610 million of deferred income tax liabilities, neither of which are subject to normalization. The recovery and amortization of these 
amounts is expected to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See “Rate Plans” herein and Note 10 for additional information.

(d)  Through 2019, Georgia Power is recovering approximately $30 million annually for storm damage, which is expected to be adjusted in the Georgia Power 

2019 Base Rate Case. See “Storm Damage Recovery” herein and Note 1 under “Storm Damage Reserves” for additional information.

(e)  The net book value of Plant Branch Units 1 through 4 at December 31, 2018 was $87 million, which is being amortized over the units’ remaining useful 
lives through 2024. The net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 at December 31, 2018 was $9 million, which will continue to be amortized through 
December 31, 2019 as provided in the 2013 ARP. Amortization of the remaining approximately $4 million net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 at 
December 31, 2019 and a total of approximately $31 million related to obsolete inventories of certain retired units is expected to be determined in the 
Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See “Integrated Resource Plan” herein for additional information.

(f)  Recovered over either the remaining life of the original issue or, if refinanced, over the remaining life of the new issue, which currently does not exceed 34 years.
(g)  Recorded as earned by employees and recovered as paid, generally within one year. This includes both vacation and banked holiday pay.
(h)  Through 2019, Georgia Power is recovering approximately $2 million annually for environmental remediation, which is expected to be adjusted in the 

Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See Note 3 under Environmental Remediation for additional information.

(i)  Comprised of several components including future generation costs, deferred nuclear outage costs, cancelled construction projects, building lease, and 

fuel-hedging losses. The timing of recovery of approximately $50 million for a future generation site is expected to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 
Base Rate Case. Nuclear outage costs are recorded and recovered or amortized over the outage cycles of each nuclear unit, which do not exceed 24 months. 
Approximately $30 million of costs associated with construction of environmental controls that will not be completed as a result of unit retirements are being 
amortized through 2022. The building lease is recorded and recovered or amortized through 2020. Fuel-hedging losses are recovered through Georgia Power’s 
fuel cost recovery mechanism upon final settlement. See “Integrated Resource Plan” herein for additional information on future generation costs.
(j)  At December 31, 2018, approximately $55 million was accrued and outstanding for refund pursuant to the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement 

Agreement and approximately $100 million was accrued for refund, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC, as a result of the 2018 retail ROE 
exceeding the allowed retail ROE range. See “Rate Plans” herein for additional information.

(k)  Comprised of Demand-Side Management (DSM) tariff over recovery and fuel-hedging gains. The amortization of DSM tariff over recovery of $3 million at 

December 31, 2018 is expected to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Fuel-hedging gains are refunded through Georgia Power’s fuel 
cost recovery mechanism upon final settlement. See “Rate Plans” herein for additional information on customer refunds and DSM tariffs.

(l)  Generally not earning a return as they are excluded from rate base or are offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.

111

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Rate Plans
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement related to Southern Company’s acquisition of Southern Company Gas 

approved by the Georgia PSC in 2016, the 2013 ARP will continue in effect until December 31, 2019, and Georgia Power will be required to 

file its next base rate case by July 1, 2019. Furthermore, through December 31, 2019, Georgia Power will retain its merger savings, net of 

transition costs, as defined in the settlement agreement; through December 31, 2022, such net merger savings will be shared on a 60/40 

basis with customers; thereafter, all merger savings will be retained by customers.

There were no changes to Georgia Power’s traditional base tariff rates, Environmental Compliance Cost Recovery (ECCR) tariff, DSM tariffs, 

or Municipal Franchise Fee tariff in 2017 or 2018.

Under the 2013 ARP, Georgia Power’s retail ROE is set at 10.95% and earnings are evaluated against a retail ROE range of 10.00% to 

12.00%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 12.00% will be directly refunded to customers, with the remaining one-third retained by Georgia 

Power. There will be no recovery of any earnings shortfall below 10.00% on an actual basis. In 2016, Georgia Power’s retail ROE exceeded 

12.00%, and Georgia Power refunded to retail customers in 2018 approximately $40 million as approved by the Georgia PSC. On February 

5, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved a settlement between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC under which Georgia Power’s 

retail ROE for 2017 was stipulated to exceed 12.00% and Georgia Power will reduce certain regulatory assets by approximately $4 million 

in lieu of providing refunds to retail customers. In 2018, Georgia Power’s retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power accrued 

approximately $100 million to refund to retail customers, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC.

On April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Georgia Power Tax 

Reform Settlement Agreement, to reflect the federal income tax rate reduction impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, Georgia Power will 

refund to customers a total of $330 million through bill credits. Georgia Power issued bill credits of approximately $130 million in 2018 and 

will issue bill credits of approximately $95 million in June 2019 and $105 million in February 2020. In addition, Georgia Power is deferring 

as a regulatory liability (i) the revenue equivalent of the tax expense reduction resulting from legislation lowering the Georgia state income 

tax rate from 6.00% to 5.75% in 2019 and (ii) the entire benefit of federal and state excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which is 

expected to total approximately $700 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018, the related regulatory liability balance totaled 

$610 million. The amortization of these regulatory liabilities is expected to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. If 

there is not a base rate case in 2019, customers will receive $185 million in annual bill credits beginning in 2020, with any additional 

federal and state income tax savings deferred as a regulatory liability, until Georgia Power’s next base rate case.

To address some of the negative cash flow and credit quality impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Georgia PSC also approved an 

increase in Georgia Power’s retail equity ratio to the lower of (i) Georgia Power’s actual common equity weight in its capital structure or 

(ii) 55%, until the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power’s actual retail common equity ratio (on a 

13-month average basis) was approximately 55%. Benefits from reduced federal income tax rates in excess of the amounts refunded to 

customers will be retained by Georgia Power to cover the carrying costs of the incremental equity in 2018 and 2019.

Integrated Resource Plan
In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power’s triennial Integrated Resource Plan (2016 IRP) including the reclassification of the 

remaining net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date to 

a regulatory asset. Recovery of the unit’s net book value will continue through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP. The timing 

of the recovery of the remaining balance of the unit’s net book value as of December 31, 2019 and costs associated with materials and 

supplies remaining at the unit retirement date was deferred for consideration in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.

In the 2016 IRP, the Georgia PSC also approved recovery of costs up to $99 million through June 30, 2019 to preserve nuclear generation 

as an option at a future generation site in Stewart County, Georgia. In March 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power’s decision to 

suspend work at the site due to changing economics, including lower load forecasts and fuel costs. The timing of recovery for costs incurred 

of approximately $50 million is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.

On January 31, 2019, Georgia Power filed its triennial IRP (2019 IRP). The filing includes a request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond 

Units 1 through 4 (840 MWs) and Plant McIntosh Unit 1 (142.5 MWs) upon approval of the 2019 IRP.

In the 2019 IRP, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value of Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 

(approximately $520 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized ratably over a period equal 

to the applicable unit’s remaining useful life through 2035. For Plant McIntosh Unit 1, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the 

remaining net book value (approximately $40 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized over 

a three-year period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Georgia Power also requested approval to reclassify any 

unusable material and supplies inventory balances remaining at the applicable unit’s retirement date to a regulatory asset for recovery over 
a period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.

112

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

The 2019 IRP also includes a request to certify approximately 25 MWs of capacity at Plant Scherer Unit 3 for the retail jurisdiction 
beginning January 1, 2020, following the expiration of a wholesale PPA.

The 2019 IRP also includes details regarding ARO costs associated with ash pond and landfill closures and post-closure care. Georgia Power 
requested the timing and rate of recovery of these costs be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See 
Note 6 for additional information regarding Georgia Power’s AROs.

Georgia Power also requested approval to issue two capacity-based requests for proposals (RFP). If approved, the first capacity-based 
RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2022 or 2023 and the second capacity-based RFP will seek resources that 
can provide capacity beginning in 2026, 2027, or 2028. Additionally, the 2019 IRP includes a request to procure an additional 1,000 MWs 
of renewable resources through a competitive bidding process. Georgia Power also proposed to invest in a portfolio of up to 50 MWs of 
battery energy storage technologies.

A decision from the Georgia PSC on the 2019 IRP is expected in mid-2019.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

Fuel Cost Recovery
Georgia Power has established fuel cost recovery rates approved by the Georgia PSC. In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia 
Power’s request to lower annual billings under an interim fuel rider by approximately $313 million effective June 1, 2016, which expired 
on December 31, 2017. On August 16, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the deferral of Georgia Power’s next fuel case to no later than 
March 16, 2020, with new rates, if any, to be effective June 1, 2020. Georgia Power continues to be allowed to adjust its fuel cost recovery 
rates under an interim fuel rider prior to the next fuel case if the under or over recovered fuel balance exceeds $200 million. Georgia 
Power’s under recovered fuel balance totaled $115 million and $165 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and is included 
in under recovered fuel clause revenues on Southern Company’s and Georgia Power’s balance sheets.

Georgia Power’s fuel cost recovery mechanism includes costs associated with a natural gas hedging program, as revised and approved by 
the Georgia PSC, allowing the use of an array of derivative instruments within a 48-month time horizon.

Fuel cost recovery revenues as recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel costs and 
amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on Southern Company’s 
or Georgia Power’s revenues or net income, but will affect operating cash flows.

Storm Damage Recovery
Georgia Power defers and recovers certain costs related to damages from major storms as mandated by the Georgia PSC. Beginning 
January 1, 2014, Georgia Power is accruing $30 million annually under the 2013 ARP that is recoverable through base rates. At 
December 31, 2018 and 2017, the balance in the regulatory asset related to storm damage was $416 million and $333 million, 
respectively, with $30 million included in other regulatory assets, current for each year and $386 million and $303 million included in 
other regulatory assets, deferred, respectively. During October 2018, Hurricane Michael caused significant damage to Georgia Power’s 
transmission and distribution facilities. The incremental restoration costs related to this hurricane deferred in the regulatory asset for 
storm damage totaled approximately $115 million. Hurricanes Irma and Matthew also caused significant damage to Georgia Power’s 
transmission and distribution facilities during September 2017 and October 2016, respectively. The incremental restoration costs related 
to Hurricanes Irma and Matthew deferred in the regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $250 million. The rate of 
storm damage cost recovery is expected to be adjusted as part of the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case and further adjusted in 
future regulatory proceedings as necessary. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

Nuclear Construction
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant 
Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In 2012, the NRC issued the related combined construction and operating licenses, which allowed full construction 
of the two AP1000 nuclear units (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each) and related facilities to begin. Until 
March 2017, construction on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continued under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, which was a substantially fixed 
price agreement. In March 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

In connection with the EPC Contractor’s bankruptcy filing, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered 
into the Interim Assessment Agreement with the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue. The Interim Assessment Agreement 
expired in July 2017 when Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, and the EPC Contractor entered into 
the Vogtle Services Agreement. Under the Vogtle Services Agreement, Westinghouse provides facility design and engineering services, 
procurement and technical support, and staff augmentation on a time and materials cost basis. The Vogtle Services Agreement provides 
that it will continue until the start-up and testing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are complete and electricity is generated and sold from 
both units. The Vogtle Services Agreement is terminable by the Vogtle Owners upon 30 days’ written notice.

113

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

In October 2017, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, executed the Bechtel Agreement, a cost 
reimbursable plus fee arrangement, whereby Bechtel is reimbursed for actual costs plus a base fee and an at-risk fee, which is subject to 
adjustment based on Bechtel’s performance against cost and schedule targets. Each Vogtle Owner is severally (not jointly) liable for its 

proportionate share, based on its ownership interest, of all amounts owed to Bechtel under the Bechtel Agreement. The Vogtle Owners 

may terminate the Bechtel Agreement at any time for their convenience, provided that the Vogtle Owners will be required to pay amounts 

related to work performed prior to the termination (including the applicable portion of the base fee), certain termination-related costs, 

and, at certain stages of the work, the applicable portion of the at-risk fee. Bechtel may terminate the Bechtel Agreement under certain 

circumstances, including certain Vogtle Owner suspensions of work, certain breaches of the Bechtel Agreement by the Vogtle Owners, 

Vogtle Owner insolvency, and certain other events. Pursuant to the Loan Guarantee Agreement between Georgia Power and the DOE, 

Georgia Power is required to obtain the DOE’s approval of the Bechtel Agreement prior to obtaining any further advances under the Loan 

Guarantee Agreement.

Cost and Schedule

Georgia Power’s approximate proportionate share of the remaining estimated capital cost to complete Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 by the 

expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, is as follows:

Base project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
Construction contingency estimate
Total project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
Net investment as of December 31, 2018(b)
Remaining estimate to complete(a)

(in billions)

$ 8.0
0.4
8.4
(4.6)
$ 3.8

(a)  Excludes financing costs expected to be capitalized through AFUDC of approximately $315 million.
(b)  Net of $1.7 billion received from Toshiba under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds.

Georgia Power estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of 

which $1.9 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2018.

As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or 

cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any required engineering changes, 

of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation 

in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly 

construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. 

To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be 

retained and deployed.

Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity 

to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of 

commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, 
was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does 

not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected 

in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate 

impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the 

results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.

There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state 

level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified 

in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern 

Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests 

have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the 

timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require 

other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there 

may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, any extension of the project schedule is currently 

estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power’s ownership interests, 

and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital 

114

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost 

forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could 

be material.

Joint Owner Contracts
In November 2017, the Vogtle Owners entered into an amendment to their joint ownership agreements for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to 
provide for, among other conditions, additional Vogtle Owner approval requirements. Effective August 31, 2018, the Vogtle Owners further 
amended the joint ownership agreements to clarify and provide procedures for certain provisions of the joint ownership agreements 
related to adverse events that require the vote of the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to 
continue construction (as amended, and together with the November 2017 amendment, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements). The 
Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements also confirm that the Vogtle Owners’ sole recourse against Georgia Power or Southern Nuclear for 
any action or inaction in connection with their performance as agent for the Vogtle Owners is limited to removal of Georgia Power and/or 
Southern Nuclear as agent, except in cases of willful misconduct.

As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power’s decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase 
in the base capital costs as described below, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were 
required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant 
Vogtle Units 3 and 4.

Amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements
In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) a binding term sheet (Vogtle Owner Term Sheet) 
with the other Vogtle Owners and MEAG’s wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC (MEAG SPVJ), MEAG Power SPVM, LLC 
(MEAG SPVM), and MEAG Power SPVP, LLC (MEAG SPVP) to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for 
the other Vogtle Owners, including additional amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements and the purchase of PTCs from 
the other Vogtle Owners, and (ii) a term sheet (MEAG Term Sheet) with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG 
SPVJ’s ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Project J) under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, 
MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet (MEAG Funding Agreement). On 
February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and MEAG’s wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG SPVM, and MEAG 
SPVP entered into certain amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term 
Sheet (Global Amendments).

Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements were 
modified as follows: (i) each Vogtle Owner must pay its proportionate share of qualifying construction costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 
and 4 based on its ownership percentage up to the estimated cost at completion (EAC) for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which formed 
the basis of Georgia Power’s forecast of $8.4 billion in the nineteenth VCM plus $800 million; (ii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 
55.7% of actual qualifying construction costs between $800 million and $1.6 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in 
$80 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 44.3% of such costs pro rata 
in accordance with their respective ownership interests; and (iii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 65.7% of qualifying construction 
costs between $1.6 billion and $2.1 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in a further $100 million of potential additional 
costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 34.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective 
ownership interests.

If the EAC is revised and exceeds the EAC in the nineteenth VCM by more than $2.1 billion, each of the other Vogtle Owners will have a 
one-time option at the time the project budget forecast is so revised to tender a portion of its ownership interest to Georgia Power in 
exchange for Georgia Power’s agreement to pay 100% of such Vogtle Owner’s remaining share of total construction costs in excess of the 
EAC in the nineteenth VCM plus $2.1 billion. In this event, Georgia Power will have the option of cancelling the project in lieu of purchasing 
a portion of the ownership interest of any other Vogtle Owner. If Georgia Power accepts the offer to purchase a portion of another Vogtle 
Owner’s ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, the ownership interest(s) to be conveyed from the tendering Vogtle Owner(s) 
to Georgia Power will be calculated based on the proportion of the cumulative amount of construction costs paid by each such tendering 
Vogtle Owner(s) and by Georgia Power as of the COD of Plant Vogtle Unit 4. For purposes of this calculation, payments made by Georgia 
Power on behalf of another Vogtle Owner in accordance with the second and third items described in the paragraph above will be treated 
as payments made by the applicable Vogtle Owner.

In the event the actual costs of construction at completion of a Unit are less than the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report and such 
Unit is placed in service in accordance with the schedule projected in the nineteenth VCM report (i.e., Plant Vogtle Unit 3 is placed in service 
by November 2021 or Plant Vogtle Unit 4 is placed in service by November 2022), Georgia Power will be entitled to 60.7% of the cost 
savings with respect to the relevant Unit and the remaining Vogtle Owners will be entitled to 39.3% of such savings on a pro rata basis in 
accordance with their respective ownership interests.

115

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

For purposes of the foregoing provisions, qualifying construction costs will not include costs (i) resulting from force majeure events, 

including governmental actions or inactions (or significant delays associated with issuance of such actions) that affect the licensing, 

completion, start-up, operations, or financing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, administrative proceedings or litigation regarding ITAAC or 

other regulatory challenges to commencement of operation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and changes in laws or regulations governing 

Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, (ii) legal fees and legal expenses incurred due to litigation with contractors or subcontractors that are 

not subsidiaries or affiliates of Southern Company, and (iii) additional costs caused by requests from the Vogtle Owners other than 

Georgia Power, except for the exercise of a right to vote granted under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, that increase costs by 

$100,000 or more.

Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership 

Agreements requiring that Vogtle Owners holding 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 vote to continue 

construction following certain adverse events (Project Adverse Events) were modified. Pursuant to the Global Amendments, the holders of 

at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 must vote to continue construction if certain Project Adverse Events 

occur, including: (i) the bankruptcy of Toshiba; (ii) the termination or rejection in bankruptcy of certain agreements, including the Vogtle 

Services Agreement, the Bechtel Agreement, or the agency agreement with Southern Nuclear; (iii) Georgia Power publicly announces its 

intention not to submit for rate recovery any portion of its investment in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the Georgia PSC determines that 

any of Georgia Power’s costs relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will not be recovered in retail rates, excluding any 

additional amounts paid by Georgia Power on behalf of the other Vogtle Owners pursuant to the Global Amendments described above 

and the first 6% of costs during any six-month VCM reporting period that are disallowed by the Georgia PSC for recovery, or for which 

Georgia Power elects not to seek cost recovery, through retail rates; and (iv) an incremental extension of one year or more over the most 

recently approved schedule. Under the Global Amendments, Georgia Power may cancel the project at any time in its sole discretion.

In addition, pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the required approval of holders of ownership interests in Plant Vogtle 

Units 3 and 4 is at least (i) 90% for a change of the primary construction contractor and (ii) 67% for material amendments to the Vogtle 

Services Agreement or agreements with Southern Nuclear or the primary construction contractor, including the Bechtel Agreement.

The Global Amendments provide that if the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests fail to vote in favor of continuing the 

project following any future Project Adverse Event, work on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will continue for a period of 30 days if the holders 

of more than 50% of the ownership interests vote in favor of continuing construction (Majority Voting Owners). In such a case, the Vogtle 

Owners (i) have agreed to negotiate in good faith towards the resumption of the project, (ii) if no agreement is reached during such 30-day 

period, the project will be cancelled, and (iii) in the event of such a cancellation, the Majority Voting Owners will be obligated to reimburse 

any other Vogtle Owner for the incremental costs it incurred during such 30-day negotiation period.

Purchase of PTCs During Commercial Operation

Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, Georgia Power has agreed to purchase additional 

PTCs from OPC, Dalton, MEAG SPVM, MEAG SPVP, and MEAG SPVJ (to the extent any MEAG SPVJ PTC rights remain after any purchases 

required under the MEAG Funding Agreement as described below) at varying purchase prices dependent upon the actual cost to complete 

construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 as compared to the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report. The purchases are at the option 

of the applicable Vogtle Owner.

Potential Funding to MEAG Project J

Pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement, and consistent with the MEAG Term Sheet, if MEAG SPVJ is unable to make its payments 

due under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements solely as a result of the occurrence of one of the following situations that materially 

impedes access to capital markets for MEAG for Project J: (i) the conduct of JEA or the City of Jacksonville, such as JEA’s legal challenges of 

its obligations under a PPA with MEAG (PPA-J), or (ii) PPA-J is declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction or rejected by JEA under 

the applicable provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (each of (i) and (ii), a JEA Default), at MEAG’s request, Georgia Power will purchase 

from MEAG SPVJ the rights to PTCs attributable to MEAG SPVJ’s share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (approximately 206 MWs) within 

30 days of such request at varying prices dependent upon the stage of construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The aggregate purchase 

price of the PTCs, together with any advances made as described in the next paragraph, shall not exceed $300 million.

At the option of MEAG, as an alternative or supplement to Georgia Power’s purchase of PTCs as described above, Georgia Power has 

agreed to provide up to $250 million in funding to MEAG for Project J in the form of advances (either advances under the Vogtle Joint 

Ownership Agreements or the purchase of MEAG Project J bonds, at the discretion of Georgia Power), subject to any required approvals of 

the Georgia PSC and the DOE.

116

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

In the event MEAG SPVJ certifies to Georgia Power that it is unable to fund its obligations under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements 

as a result of a JEA Default and Georgia Power becomes obligated to provide funding as described above, MEAG is required to (i) assign 

to Georgia Power its right to vote on any future Project Adverse Event and (ii) diligently pursue JEA for its breach of PPA-J. In addition, 

Georgia Power agreed that it will not sue MEAG for any amounts due from MEAG SPVJ under MEAG’s guarantee of MEAG SPVJ’s 

obligations so long as MEAG SPVJ complies with the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement as to its payment obligations and the other 

non-payment provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements.

Under the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement, Georgia Power may cancel the project in lieu of providing funding in the form of 

advances or PTC purchases.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

Regulatory Matters

In 2009, the Georgia PSC voted to certify construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with a certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. In 

addition, in 2009 the Georgia PSC approved inclusion of the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 related CWIP accounts in rate base, and the State of 

Georgia enacted the Georgia Nuclear Energy Financing Act, which allows Georgia Power to recover financing costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 

and 4. Financing costs are recovered on all applicable certified costs through annual adjustments to the NCCR tariff up to the certified 

capital cost of $4.418 billion. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had recovered approximately $1.9 billion of financing costs. Financing 

costs related to capital costs above $4.418 billion will be recovered through AFUDC; however, Georgia Power will not record AFUDC 

related to any capital costs in excess of the total deemed reasonable by the Georgia PSC (currently $7.3 billion) and not requested for rate 

recovery. On December 18, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power’s request to increase the NCCR tariff by $88 million annually, 

effective January 1, 2019.

Georgia Power is required to file semi-annual VCM reports with the Georgia PSC by February 28 and August 31 of each year. In 2013, in 

connection with the eighth VCM report, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC 

to waive the requirement to amend the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 certificate in accordance with the 2009 certification order until the 

completion of Plant Vogtle Unit 3, or earlier if deemed appropriate by the Georgia PSC and Georgia Power.

In 2016, the Georgia PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement (Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement) resolving certain prudency 

matters in connection with the fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC voted to approve (and issued its related 

order on January 11, 2018) Georgia Power’s seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction with 

Southern Nuclear as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, and modified the Vogtle Cost Settlement 

Agreement. The Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, as modified by the January 11, 2018 order, resolved the following regulatory matters 

related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4: (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the 

fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (ii) the Contractor Settlement Agreement was 

reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate 

base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with 

the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) Georgia Power would have the burden to show that any capital costs above 

$5.68 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under 

the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 

4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed 

reasonable Georgia Power’s revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, 

respectively; (vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will 

be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff (a) from 10.95% 

(the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in the 2013 ARP) to 10.00% effective January 1, 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 

8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the ROE in no case will be 

less than Georgia Power’s average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for AFUDC equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 

from 10.00% to Georgia Power’s average cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and (ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching 

commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the Vogtle 

Cost Settlement Agreement. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational 

by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each 

month (but not lower than Georgia Power’s average cost of long-term debt) until the respective Unit is commercially operational. The ROE 

reductions negatively impacted earnings by approximately $100 million, $25 million, and $20 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, 

and are estimated to have negative earnings impacts of approximately $75 million in 2019 and an aggregate of approximately $615 million 

from 2020 to 2022.

117

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power’s 

seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.

On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. (GIPL) and Partnership for Southern Equity, Inc. (PSE) filed a petition appealing 

the Georgia PSC’s January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. On March 8, 2018, Georgia Watch filed a similar appeal to 

the Fulton County Superior Court for judicial review of the Georgia PSC’s decision and denial of Georgia Watch’s motion for reconsideration. 

On December 21, 2018, the Fulton County Superior Court granted Georgia Power’s motion to dismiss the two appeals. On January 9, 2019, 

GIPL, PSE, and Georgia Watch filed an appeal of this decision with the Georgia Court of Appeals. Georgia Power believes the appeal has 

no merit; however, an adverse outcome in the appeal combined with subsequent adverse action by the Georgia PSC could have a material 

impact on Southern Company’s and Georgia Power’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

In preparation for its nineteenth VCM filing, Georgia Power requested Southern Nuclear to perform a full cost reforecast for the project. 

This reforecast, performed prior to the nineteenth VCM filing, resulted in a $0.7 billion increase to the base capital cost forecast reported in 

the second quarter 2018. This base cost increase primarily resulted from changed assumptions related to the finalization of contract scopes 

and management responsibilities for Bechtel and over 60 subcontractors, labor productivity rates, and craft labor incentives, as well as the 

related levels of project management, oversight, and support, including field supervision and engineering support.

Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC’s 

order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, 

Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for these cost increases included in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing 

costs) in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs 

currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base 

capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included 

in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by 

management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to 

income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018, which includes the total increase in the base capital cost forecast 

and construction contingency estimate.

On August 31, 2018, Georgia Power filed its nineteenth VCM report with the Georgia PSC, which requested approval of $578 million of 

construction capital costs incurred from January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018. On February 19, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved the 

nineteenth VCM, but deferred approval of $51.6 million of expenditures related to Georgia Power’s portion of an administrative claim filed 

in the Westinghouse bankruptcy proceedings. Through the nineteenth VCM, the Georgia PSC has approved total construction capital costs 

incurred through June 30, 2018 of $5.4 billion (before $1.7 billion of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and 

approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). In addition, the staff of the Georgia PSC requested, and Georgia Power agreed, to 

file its twentieth VCM report concurrently with the twenty-first VCM report by August 31, 2019.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

DOE Financing

At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 costs through the Loan 
Guarantee Agreement and a multi-advance credit facility among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB, which provides for borrowings 

of up to $3.46 billion, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment 

to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion in additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. In 

September 2018, the DOE extended the conditional commitment to March 31, 2019. Any further extension must be approved by the 

DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation 

of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of 

other conditions. See Note 8 under “Long-term Debt – DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings” for additional information, including applicable 

covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 

and 4), and conditions to borrowing.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

118

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Mississippi Power

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the balance sheets of Mississippi Power at December 31, 2018 and 2017 relate to:

Retiree benefit plans – regulatory assets
Asset retirement obligations
Kemper County energy facility assets, net
Remaining net book value of retired assets
Property tax
Deferred charges related to income taxes
Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4
ECO carryforward
Other regulatory assets
Deferred credits related to income taxes
Other cost of removal obligations
Property damage
Other regulatory liabilities
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net

2018

$ 171
143
69
41
44
34
36
26
28
(377)
(185)
(56)
(9)
$ (35)

2017

(in millions)

Note

$ 174
95
88
44
43
36
36
26
28
(377)
(178)
(57)
—
$ (42)

(a)
(b)
(c)
(d))
(e)
(b)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(b)
(j)
(k)

Note: Unless otherwise noted, the recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) are approved by the Mississippi PSC and are 
as follows:

(a)  Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which may range up to 15 years. See Note 11 for additional information.

(b)  Asset retirement and other cost of removal obligations and deferred charges related to income taxes are generally recovered over the related property lives, 
which may range up to 48 years. Asset retirement and other cost of removal obligations will be settled and trued up upon completion of removal activities 
over a period to be determined by the Mississippi PSC.

(c)  Includes $91 million of regulatory assets and $22 million of regulatory liabilities. The retail portion includes $75 million of regulatory assets and $22 million 
of regulatory liabilities that are being recovered in rates over an eight-year period through 2025 and a six-year period through 2023, respectively. Recovery 
of the wholesale portion of the regulatory assets in the amount of $16 million is expected to be determined in a settlement agreement with wholesale 
customers in 2019. For additional information, see “Kemper County Energy Facility – Rate Recovery – Kemper Settlement Agreement” herein.

(d)  Retail portion includes approximately $26 million being recovered over a five-year period through 2021 and 2022 for Plant Watson and Plant Greene 
County, respectively. Recovery of the wholesale portion of approximately $15 million is expected to be determined in a settlement agreement with 
wholesale customers in 2019.

(e)  Recovered through the ad valorem tax adjustment clause over a 12-month period beginning in April of the following year. See “Ad Valorem Tax Adjustment” 

herein for additional information.

(f)  Represents the difference between the revenue requirement under the purchase option and the revenue requirement assuming operating lease accounting 

treatment for the extended term, which will be amortized over a 10-year period beginning October 2021.

(g)  Generally recovered through the ECO Plan clause in the year following the deferral. See “Environmental Compliance Plan” herein.

(h)  Comprised of $9 million related to vacation pay, $8 million related to loss on reacquired debt, and other miscellaneous assets. These costs are recorded and 
recovered or amortized over periods which may range up to 50 years. This amount also includes fuel-hedging assets which are recorded over the life of 
the underlying hedged purchase contracts, which generally do not exceed three years. Upon final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered through 
the ECM.

(i)  Includes excess deferred income taxes primarily associated with Tax Reform Legislation of $377 million, of which $266 million is related to protected 

deferred income taxes to be recovered over the related property lives utilizing the average rate assumption method in accordance with IRS normalization 
principles and $111 million related to unprotected (not subject to normalization). The unprotected portion associated with the Kemper County energy 
facility is $46 million, of which $33 million is being amortized over eight years through 2025 for retail and the amortization of $15 million is expected 
to be determined in a settlement agreement with wholesale customers in 2019. Mississippi Power also has $9 million of excess deferred income tax 
benefits associated with the System Restoration Rider being amortized over an eight-year period through 2025. Amortization of the remaining portions 
of the unprotected deferred income taxes associated with the Tax Reform Legislation are expected to be determined in Mississippi Power’s next base rate 
proceeding, which is scheduled to be filed in the fourth quarter 2019 (Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case). See “Kemper County Energy Facility” and 
“FERC Matters – Mississippi Power – Municipal and Rural Associations Tariff” herein and Note 10 for additional information.

(j)  For additional information, see “System Restoration Rider” herein.

(k)  Comprised of numerous immaterial components including deferred income tax credits and other miscellaneous liabilities that are recorded and refunded or 

amortized generally over periods not exceeding one year.

119

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Operations Review
In August 2018, the Mississippi PSC began an operations review of Mississippi Power, for which the final report is expected prior to the 
conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Mississippi Power expects that the review will include, but not be limited to, 
a comparative analysis of its costs, its cost recovery framework, and ways in which it may streamline management operations for the 
reasonable benefit of ratepayers. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

Performance Evaluation Plan
Mississippi Power’s retail base rates generally are set under the PEP, a rate plan approved by the Mississippi PSC. Two filings are made 
for each calendar year: the PEP projected filing, which is typically filed prior to the beginning of the year based on a projected revenue 
requirement, and the PEP lookback filing, which is filed after the end of the year and allows for review of the actual revenue requirement 
compared to the projected filing.

In 2011, Mississippi Power submitted its annual PEP lookback filing for 2010, which recommended no surcharge or refund. Later in 2011, 
the MPUS disputed certain items in the 2010 PEP lookback filing. In 2012, the Mississippi PSC issued an order canceling Mississippi Power’s 
PEP lookback filing for 2011. In 2013, the MPUS contested Mississippi Power’s PEP lookback filing for 2012, which indicated a refund 
due to customers of $5 million. In 2014 through 2018, Mississippi Power submitted its annual PEP lookback filings for the prior years, 
which for each of 2013, 2014, and 2017 indicated no surcharge or refund and for each of 2015 and 2016 indicated a $5 million surcharge. 
Additionally, in July 2016, in November 2016, and in November 2017, Mississippi Power submitted its annual projected PEP filings for 
2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively, which for 2016 and 2017 indicated no change in rates and for 2018 indicated a rate increase of 4%, or 
$38 million in annual revenues. The Mississippi PSC suspended each of these filings to allow more time for review.

On February 7, 2018, Mississippi Power revised its annual projected PEP filing for 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. 
The revised filing requested an increase of $26 million in annual revenues, based on a performance adjusted ROE of 9.33% and an increased 
equity ratio of 55%. On July 27, 2018, Mississippi Power and the MPUS entered into a settlement agreement, which was approved by 
the Mississippi PSC on August 7, 2018, with respect to the 2018 PEP filing and all unresolved PEP filings for prior years (PEP Settlement 
Agreement). Rates under the PEP Settlement Agreement became effective with the first billing cycle of September 2018. The PEP Settlement 
Agreement provides for an increase of approximately $21.6 million in annual base retail revenues, which excludes certain compensation 
costs contested by the MPUS, as well as approximately $2 million which was subsequently approved for recovery through the 2018 Energy 
Efficiency Cost Rider as discussed below. Under the PEP Settlement Agreement, Mississippi Power is deferring the contested compensation 
costs for 2018 and 2019 as a regulatory asset, which totaled $4 million as of December 31, 2018 and is included in other regulatory assets, 
deferred on the balance sheet. The Mississippi PSC is currently expected to rule on the appropriate treatment for such costs in connection 
with the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. 

Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, Mississippi Power’s performance-adjusted allowed ROE is 9.31% and its allowed equity ratio 
is capped at 51%, pending further review by the Mississippi PSC. In lieu of the requested equity ratio increase, Mississippi Power retained 
$44 million of excess accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation until the conclusion of the Mississippi 
Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Further, Mississippi Power agreed to seek equity contributions sufficient to restore its equity ratio to 50% 
by December 31, 2018. Since Mississippi Power’s actual average equity ratio for 2018 was more than 1% lower than the 50% target, 
Mississippi Power deferred the corresponding difference in its revenue requirement of approximately $4 million as a regulatory liability 
for resolution in the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, PEP proceedings are suspended 
until after the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case and Mississippi Power is not required to make any PEP filings for 
regulatory years 2018, 2019, and 2020. The PEP Settlement Agreement also resolved all open PEP filings with no change to customer rates. 
As a result, in the third quarter 2018, Mississippi Power recognized revenues of $5 million previously reserved in connection with the 2012 
PEP lookback filing.

Energy Efficiency
In 2013, the Mississippi PSC approved an energy efficiency and conservation rule requiring electric and gas utilities in Mississippi serving 
more than 25,000 customers to implement energy efficiency programs and standards. Quick Start Plans, which include a portfolio of 
energy efficiency programs that are intended to provide benefits to a majority of customers, were extended by an order issued by the 
Mississippi PSC in July 2016, until the time the Mississippi PSC approves a comprehensive portfolio plan program. The ultimate outcome of 
this matter cannot be determined at this time.

On May 8, 2018, the Mississippi PSC issued an order approving Mississippi Power’s revised annual projected Energy Efficiency Cost 
Rider 2018 compliance filing, which increased annual retail revenues by approximately $3 million effective with the first billing cycle for 
June 2018.

On February 5, 2019, the Mississippi PSC issued an order approving Mississippi Power’s Energy Efficiency Cost Rider 2019 compliance filing, 
which included a slight decrease in annual retail revenues, effective with the first billing cycle in March 2019.

120

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Environmental Compliance Overview Plan
In accordance with a 2011 accounting order from the Mississippi PSC, Mississippi Power has the authority to defer in a regulatory asset 
for future recovery all plant retirement- or partial retirement-related costs resulting from environmental regulations. The Mississippi PSC 
approved $41 million and $17 million of costs that were reclassified to regulatory assets associated with the fuel conversion of Plant 
Watson and Plant Greene County, respectively, for amortization over five-year periods that began in July 2016 and July 2017, respectively. 
As a result, these decisions are not expected to have a material impact on Mississippi Power’s financial statements.

In August 2016, the Mississippi PSC approved Mississippi Power’s revised ECO Plan filing for 2016, which requested the maximum 2% 
annual increase in revenues, or approximately $18 million, primarily related to the Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2 scrubbers placed in service 
in 2015. The revised rates became effective with the first billing cycle for September 2016. Approximately $22 million of related revenue 
requirements in excess of the 2% maximum was deferred for inclusion in the 2017 filing, along with related carrying costs.

In May 2017, the Mississippi PSC approved Mississippi Power’s ECO Plan filing for 2017, which requested the maximum 2% annual increase 
in revenues, or approximately $18 million, primarily related to the carryforward from the prior year. The rates became effective with 
the first billing cycle for June 2017. Approximately $26 million, plus carrying costs, of related revenue requirements in excess of the 2% 
maximum was deferred for inclusion in the 2018 filing.

On February 14, 2018, Mississippi Power submitted its ECO Plan filing for 2018, including the effects of the Tax Reform Legislation, which 
requested the maximum 2% annual increase in revenues, or approximately $17 million, primarily related to the carryforward from the 
prior year.

On August 3, 2018, Mississippi Power and the MPUS entered into the ECO Settlement Agreement, which provides for an increase of 
approximately $17 million in annual base retail revenues and was approved by the Mississippi PSC on August 7, 2018. Rates under the ECO 
Settlement Agreement became effective with the first billing cycle of September 2018 and will continue in effect until modified by the 
Mississippi PSC. These revenues are expected to be sufficient to recover the costs included in Mississippi Power’s request for 2018, as well 
as the remaining deferred amounts, totaling $26 million at December 31, 2018, along with the related carrying costs. In accordance with 
the ECO Settlement Agreement, ECO Plan proceedings are suspended until after the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate 
Case and Mississippi Power is not required to make any ECO Plan filings for 2018, 2019, and 2020, with any necessary adjustments to be 
reflected in the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. The ECO Settlement Agreement contains the same terms as the PEP Settlement 
Agreement described herein with respect to allowed ROE and equity ratio. At December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power has recorded 
$2 million in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet related to the actual December 31, 2018 average equity ratio 
differential from target applicable to the ECO Plan.

Fuel Cost Recovery
Mississippi Power establishes, annually, a retail fuel cost recovery factor that is approved by the Mississippi PSC. Mississippi Power is 
required to file for an adjustment to the retail fuel cost recovery factor annually. In January 2017, the Mississippi PSC approved the 
2017 retail fuel cost recovery factor, effective February 2017 through January 2018, which resulted in an annual revenue increase of 
$55 million. On January 16, 2018, the Mississippi PSC approved the 2018 retail fuel cost recovery factor, effective February 2018 through 
January 2019, which resulted in an annual revenue increase of $39 million. At December 31, 2018, the amount of over recovered retail fuel 
costs included in the balance sheet in other accounts payable was approximately $8 million compared to $6 million under recovered at 
December 31, 2017. On January 10, 2019, the Mississippi PSC approved the 2019 retail fuel cost recovery factor, effective February 2019, 
which results in a $35 million decrease in annual revenues as a result of lower expected fuel costs.

Mississippi Power’s operating revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel cost and amounts billed in accordance 
with the currently approved cost recovery rate. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor should have no significant effect on Southern 
Company’s or Mississippi Power’s revenues or net income but will affect operating cash flows.

Ad Valorem Tax Adjustment
Mississippi Power establishes annually an ad valorem tax adjustment factor that is approved by the Mississippi PSC to collect the ad 
valorem taxes paid by Mississippi Power. In 2018, 2017, and 2016, the Mississippi PSC approved Mississippi Power’s annual ad valorem tax 
adjustment factor filing, which included a rate increase of 0.8%, or $7 million, in 2018, a rate increase of 0.85%, or $8 million, in 2017, and 
a rate decrease of 0.07%, or $1 million, in 2016.

System Restoration Rider
Mississippi Power carries insurance for the cost of certain types of damage to generation plants and general property. However, Mississippi 
Power is self-insured for the cost of storm, fire, and other uninsured casualty damage to its property, including transmission and 
distribution facilities. As permitted by the Mississippi PSC and the FERC, Mississippi Power accrues for the cost of such damage through 
an annual expense accrual credited to regulatory liability accounts for the retail and wholesale jurisdictions. The cost of repairing actual 
damage resulting from such events that individually exceed $50,000 is charged to the reserve. Every three years the Mississippi PSC, the 

121

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

MPUS, and Mississippi Power will agree on SRR revenue level(s) for the ensuing period, based on historical data, expected exposure, type 
and amount of insurance coverage, excluding insurance cost, and any other relevant information. The accrual amount and the reserve 
balance are determined based on the SRR revenue level(s). If a significant change in circumstances occurs, then the SRR revenue level can 
be adjusted more frequently if Mississippi Power and the MPUS or the Mississippi PSC deem the change appropriate. The property damage 
reserve accrual will be the difference between the approved SRR revenues and the SRR revenue requirement, excluding any accrual to 
the reserve. In addition, SRR allows Mississippi Power to set up a regulatory asset, pending review, if the allowable actual retail property 
damage costs exceed the amount in the retail property damage reserve. Mississippi Power made retail accruals of $1 million, $3 million, 
and $4 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Mississippi Power also accrued $0.3 million annually in 2018, 2017, and 2016 for 
the wholesale jurisdiction. As of December 31, 2018, the property damage reserve balances were $55 million and $1 million for retail and 
wholesale, respectively.

Based on Mississippi Power’s annual SRR rate filings, the SRR rate was zero for all years presented and Mississippi Power accrued 
$2 million, $4 million, and $3 million to the property damage reserve in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The SRR rate filings were 
suspended by the Mississippi PSC for review for a period not to exceed 120 days from their respective filing dates, after which the filings 
became effective.

In January 2017, a tornado caused extensive damage to Mississippi Power’s transmission and distribution infrastructure. The cost of storm 
damage repairs was approximately $9 million. A portion of these costs was charged to the retail property damage reserve and addressed in 
the 2018 SRR rate filing.

Kemper County Energy Facility

Overview
The Kemper County energy facility was designed to utilize IGCC technology with an expected output capacity of 582 MWs and to be 
fueled by locally mined lignite (an abundant, lower heating value coal) from a mine owned by Mississippi Power and situated adjacent 
to the Kemper County energy facility. The mine, operated by North American Coal Corporation, started commercial operation in 2013. In 
connection with the Kemper County energy facility construction, Mississippi Power constructed approximately 61 miles of CO2 pipeline 
infrastructure for the transport of captured CO2 for use in enhanced oil recovery.

Schedule and Cost Estimate
In 2012, the Mississippi PSC issued an order (2012 MPSC CPCN Order), confirming the CPCN originally approved by the Mississippi PSC in 
2010 authorizing the acquisition, construction, and operation of the Kemper County energy facility. The certificated cost estimate of the 
Kemper County energy facility included in the 2012 MPSC CPCN Order was $2.4 billion, net of approximately $0.57 billion for the cost 
of the lignite mine and equipment, the cost of the CO2 pipeline facilities, AFUDC, and certain general exceptions (Cost Cap Exceptions). 
The 2012 MPSC CPCN Order approved a construction cost cap of up to $2.88 billion, with recovery of prudently-incurred costs subject 
to approval by the Mississippi PSC. The Kemper County energy facility was originally projected to be placed in service in May 2014. 
Mississippi Power placed the combined cycle and the associated common facilities portion of the Kemper County energy facility in service 
in August 2014. The combined cycle and associated common facilities portions of the Kemper County energy facility were dedicated as 
Plant Ratcliffe on April 27, 2018.

On June 21, 2017, the Mississippi PSC stated its intent to issue an order, which occurred on July 6, 2017, directing Mississippi Power to 
pursue a settlement under which the Kemper County energy facility would be operated as a natural gas plant, rather than an IGCC plant, 
and address all issues associated with the Kemper County energy facility. The order established a new docket for the purpose of pursuing a 
global settlement of the related costs (Kemper Settlement Docket). On June 28, 2017, Mississippi Power notified the Mississippi PSC that it 
would begin a process to suspend operations and start-up activities on the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility, given the 
uncertainty as to its future.

At the time of project suspension in June 2017, the total cost estimate for the Kemper County energy facility was approximately 
$7.38 billion, including approximately $5.95 billion of costs subject to the construction cost cap, and was net of the $137 million in 
additional grants from the DOE received in April 2016. In the aggregate, Mississippi Power had recorded charges to income of $3.07 billion 
($1.89 billion after tax) as a result of changes in the cost estimate above the cost cap for the Kemper IGCC through May 31, 2017.

Given the Mississippi PSC’s stated intent regarding no further rate increase for the Kemper County energy facility and the subsequent 
suspension, cost recovery of the gasifier portions became no longer probable; therefore, Mississippi Power recorded an additional charge 
to income in June 2017 of $2.8 billion ($2.0 billion after tax), which included estimated costs associated with the gasification portions of 
the plant and lignite mine. During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, Mississippi Power recorded charges to income of $242 million 
($206 million after tax), including $164 million for ongoing project costs, estimated mine and gasifier-related costs, and certain termination 
costs during the suspension period prior to conclusion of the Kemper Settlement Docket, as well as the charge associated with the Kemper 
Settlement Agreement discussed below.

122

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

In 2018, Mississippi Power recorded pre-tax charges to income of $37 million ($27 million after tax), primarily resulting from the 

abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at 

the Kemper County energy facility. In addition, Mississippi Power recorded a credit to earnings of $95 million in the fourth quarter 2018 

primarily resulting from the reduction of a valuation allowance for a state income tax NOL carryforward associated with the Kemper 

County energy facility. Additional closure costs for the mine and gasifier-related assets, currently estimated at up to $10 million pre-tax 

(excluding salvage, net of dismantlement costs), may be incurred through the first half of 2020. In addition, period costs, including, but not 

limited to, costs for compliance and safety, ARO accretion, and property taxes for the mine and gasifier-related assets, are estimated to 

total $11 million in 2019 and $2 million to $4 million annually in 2020 through 2023. Mississippi Power is currently evaluating its options 

regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 

2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the CO2 pipeline, the cost of removal would have a material impact on Mississippi 

Power’s financial statements and could have a material impact on Southern Company’s financial statements. The ultimate outcome of 

these matters cannot be determined at this time.

See Note 10 for additional information.

Rate Recovery

Kemper Settlement Agreement

In 2015, the Mississippi PSC issued an order (In-Service Asset Rate Order) regarding the Kemper County energy facility assets that were 

commercially operational and providing service to customers (the transmission facilities, combined cycle, natural gas pipeline, and water 

pipeline) and other related costs. The In-Service Asset Rate Order provided for retail rate recovery of an annual revenue requirement of 

approximately $126 million which went into effect on December 17, 2015.

On February 6, 2018, the Mississippi PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement related to cost recovery for the Kemper County energy 

facility among Mississippi Power, the MPUS, and certain intervenors (Kemper Settlement Agreement), which resolved all cost recovery 

issues, modified the CPCN to limit the Kemper County energy facility to natural gas combined cycle operation, and provided for an annual 

revenue requirement of approximately $99.3 million for costs related to the Kemper County energy facility, which included the impact of 

the Tax Reform Legislation. The revenue requirement is based on (i) a fixed ROE for 2018 of 8.6% excluding any performance adjustment, 

(ii) a ROE for 2019 calculated in accordance with PEP, excluding the performance adjustment, (iii) for future years, a performance-based 

ROE calculated pursuant to PEP, and (iv) amortization periods for the related regulatory assets and liabilities of eight years and six years, 

respectively. The revenue requirement also reflects a disallowance related to a portion of Mississippi Power’s investment in the Kemper 

County energy facility requested for inclusion in rate base, which was recorded in the fourth quarter 2017 as an additional charge to 

income of approximately $78 million ($85 million net of accumulated depreciation of $7 million) pre-tax ($48 million after tax).

Under the Kemper Settlement Agreement, retail customer rates reflect a reduction of approximately $26.8 million annually, effective with 

the first billing cycle of April 2018, and include no recovery for costs associated with the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy 

facility in 2018 or at any future date.

Reserve Margin Plan

On August 6, 2018, Mississippi Power filed its proposed Reserve Margin Plan (RMP), as required by the Mississippi PSC’s order in the 

Kemper Settlement Docket. Under the RMP, Mississippi Power proposed alternatives that would reduce its reserve margin, with the most 

economic of the alternatives being the two-year and seven-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Watson Units 4 and 5, respectively, 

to the first quarter 2022 and the four-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 to the third quarter 2021 

and the third quarter 2022, respectively, in order to lower or avoid operating costs. The Plant Greene County unit retirements would require 

the completion by Alabama Power of proposed transmission and system reliability improvements, as well as agreement by Alabama Power. 

The RMP filing also states that, in the event the Mississippi PSC ultimately approves an alternative that includes an accelerated retirement, 

Mississippi Power would require authorization to defer in a regulatory asset for future recovery the remaining net book value of the units 

at the time of retirement. A decision by the Mississippi PSC that does not include recovery of the remaining book value of any generating 

units retired could have a material impact on Mississippi Power’s and Southern Company’s financial statements. The ultimate outcome of 

this matter cannot be determined at this time.

Lignite Mine and CO2 Pipeline Facilities

Mississippi Power owns the lignite mine and equipment and mineral reserves located around the Kemper County energy facility site. The 

mine started commercial operation in June 2013.

123

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

In 2010, Mississippi Power executed a 40-year management fee contract with Liberty Fuels Company, LLC (Liberty Fuels), a wholly-owned 

subsidiary of The North American Coal Corporation, which developed, constructed, and is responsible for the mining operations through the 

end of the mine reclamation. As the mining permit holder, Liberty Fuels has a legal obligation to perform mine reclamation and Mississippi 

Power has a contractual obligation to fund all reclamation activities. As a result of the abandonment of the Kemper IGCC, final mine 

reclamation began in 2018 and is expected to be substantially completed in 2020, with monitoring expected to continue through 2027. 

See Note 6 and Note 7 under “Mississippi Power” for additional information.

In addition, Mississippi Power constructed the CO2 pipeline for the planned transport of captured CO2 for use in enhanced oil recovery and 

entered into an agreement with Denbury Onshore (Denbury) to purchase the captured CO2. The agreement with Denbury was terminated 

in December 2018 and did not have a material impact on Southern Company’s or Mississippi Power’s results of operations. Mississippi 

Power is currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This 

evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the CO2 pipeline, the cost of removal 

would have a material impact on Mississippi Power’s financial statements and could have a material impact on Southern Company’s 

financial statements. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

Government Grants

In 2010, the DOE, through a cooperative agreement with SCS, agreed to fund $270 million of the Kemper County energy facility through 

the grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2. Through December 31, 2018, Mississippi 

Power received total DOE grants of $387 million, of which $382 million reduced the construction costs of the Kemper County energy 

facility and $5 million reimbursed Mississippi Power for expenses associated with DOE reporting. On December 12, 2018, Mississippi Power 

filed with the DOE its request for property closeout certification under the contract related to the grants received. Mississippi Power and 

the DOE are currently in discussions regarding the requested closeout and property disposition, which may require payment to the DOE for 

a portion of certain property that is to be retained by Mississippi Power. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this 

time; however, it could have a material impact on Mississippi Power’s financial statements and a significant impact on Southern Company’s 

financial statements.

Southern Company Gas

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the balance sheets of Southern Company Gas at December 31, 2018 and 2017 relate to:

Environmental remediation
Retiree benefit plans
Long-term debt fair value adjustment
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues
Other regulatory assets
Other cost of removal obligations
Deferred income tax credits
Over recovered regulatory clause revenues
Other regulatory liabilities
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net

2018

$

311
161
121
90
59
(1,585)
(940)
(43)
(46)
$(1,872)

2017
(in millions)

$ 410
270
138
98
79
(1,646)
(1,063)
(144)
(21)
$(1,879)

Note

(a,b)
(a,c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(g,i)
(e)
(h)

Note: Unless otherwise noted, the recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) have been approved or accepted by the 
relevant state PSC or other regulatory body and are as follows:

(a)  Not earning a return as offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.
(b)  Recovered through environmental cost recovery mechanisms when the remediation is performed or the work is performed.
(c)  Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which range up to 15 years. See Note 11 for additional information.
(d)  Recovered over the remaining life of the original debt issuances, which range up to 20 years.
(e)  Recorded and recovered or amortized over periods generally not exceeding seven years. In addition to natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, the natural 
gas distribution utilities are authorized to utilize other cost recovery mechanisms, such as regulatory riders, which vary by utility but allow recovery of 
certain costs, such as those related to infrastructure replacement programs, as well as environmental remediation and energy efficiency plans.

(f)  Comprised of several components including unamortized loss on reacquired debt, weather normalization, franchise gas, deferred depreciation, and financial 
instrument-hedging assets, which are recovered or amortized over periods generally not exceeding 10 years, except for financial hedging-instruments. 
Financial instrument-hedging assets are recorded over the life of the underlying hedged purchase contracts, which generally do not exceed two years. Upon 
final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered, and actual income earned is refunded through the energy cost recovery clause.

(g)  Other cost of removal obligations are recorded and deferred income tax liabilities are amortized over the related property lives, which may range up to 

80 years. Cost of removal liabilities will be settled and trued up following completion of the related activities.

124

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

(h)  Comprised of several components including amounts to be refunded to customers as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, energy efficiency programs, 
and unamortized bond issuance costs and financial instrument-hedging liabilities which are recovered or amortized over periods generally not exceeding 
20 years, except for financial hedging-instruments. Financial instrument-hedging liabilities are recorded over the life of the underlying hedged purchase 
contracts, which generally do not exceed two years. Upon final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered, and actual income earned is refunded 
through the energy cost recovery clause. See “Rate Proceedings” herein for additional information regarding customer refunds resulting from the 
Tax Reform Legislation.

(i)  Includes excess deferred income tax liabilities not subject to normalization as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, the recovery and amortization of 

which is expected to be determined by the applicable state regulatory agencies in future rate proceedings. See “Rate Proceedings” herein and Note 10 for 
additional details.

Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects
In addition to capital expenditures recovered through base rates by each of the natural gas distribution utilities, Nicor Gas and Virginia 

Natural Gas have separate rate riders that provide timely recovery of capital expenditures for specific infrastructure replacement programs. 

Descriptions of the infrastructure replacement programs and capital projects at the natural gas distribution utilities follow:

Nicor Gas

In 2013, Illinois enacted legislation that allows Nicor Gas to provide more widespread safety and reliability enhancements to its distribution 

system. The legislation stipulates that rate increases to customers as a result of any infrastructure investments shall not exceed a cumulative 

annual average of 4.0% or, in any given year, 5.5% of base rate revenues. In 2014, the Illinois Commission approved the nine-year regulatory 

infrastructure program, Investing in Illinois, subject to annual review. In conjunction with the base rate case order issued by the Illinois 

Commission on January 31, 2018, Nicor Gas is recovering program costs incurred prior to December 31, 2017 through base rates. Nicor Gas 

has requested that the program costs incurred subsequent to December 31, 2017, which are currently being recovered through a separate 

rider, be addressed in the base rate case filed November 9, 2018. See “Rate Proceedings” herein for additional information.

Virginia Natural Gas

In 2012, the Virginia Commission approved the Steps to Advance Virginia’s Energy (SAVE) program, an accelerated infrastructure 

replacement program, to be completed over a five-year period. In 2016, the Virginia Commission approved an extension to the SAVE 

program for Virginia Natural Gas to replace more than 200 miles of aging pipeline infrastructure and invest up to $30 million in 2016 and 

up to $35 million annually through 2021.

The SAVE program is subject to annual review by the Virginia Commission. In conjunction with the base rate case order issued by the 

Virginia Commission in December 2017, Virginia Natural Gas is recovering program costs incurred prior to September 1, 2017 through base 

rates. Program costs incurred subsequent to September 1, 2017 are currently recovered through a separate rider and are subject to future 

base rate case proceedings.

Atlanta Gas Light

GRAM

In February 2017, the Georgia PSC approved GRAM and a $20 million increase in annual base rate revenues for Atlanta Gas Light, effective 

March 1, 2017. GRAM adjusts base rates annually, up or down, using an earnings band based on the previously approved ROE of 10.75% 

and does not collect revenue through special riders and surcharges. Atlanta Gas Light adjusts rates up to the lower end of the band of 

10.55% and adjusts rates down to the higher end of the band of 10.95%. Various infrastructure programs previously authorized by the 

Georgia PSC under Atlanta Gas Light’s STRIDE program including the Integrated Vintage Plastic Replacement Program to replace aging 

plastic pipe and the Integrated System Reinforcement Program to upgrade Atlanta Gas Light’s distribution system and LNG facilities in 

Georgia continue under GRAM and the recovery of and return on the infrastructure program investments are included in annual base 

rate adjustments. The Georgia PSC reviews Atlanta Gas Light’s performance annually under GRAM. See Rate Proceedings” herein for 

additional information.

Pursuant to the GRAM approval, Atlanta Gas Light and the staff of the Georgia PSC agreed to a variation of the Integrated Customer 

Growth Program to extend pipeline facilities to serve customers in areas without pipeline access and create new economic development 

opportunities in Georgia, which was formerly part of the STRIDE program. As a result, a new tariff was created, effective October 10, 2017, 

to provide up to $15 million annually for Atlanta Gas Light to commit to strategic economic development projects. Projects under this tariff 

must be approved by the Georgia PSC.

The orders for the STRIDE program provide for recovery of all prudent costs incurred in the performance of the program. Atlanta Gas Light 

will recover from end-use customers, through billings to Marketers, the costs related to the program, net of any related cost savings. The 

regulatory asset represents incurred program costs that will be collected through GRAM. The future expected costs to be recovered through 

125

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

rates related to allowed, but not incurred, costs are recognized in an unrecognized ratemaking amount that is not reflected on the balance 

sheets. This allowed cost is primarily the equity return on the capital investment under the program. See “Unrecognized Ratemaking 

Amounts” herein for additional information.

Atlanta Gas Light capitalizes and depreciates the capital expenditure costs incurred from the STRIDE programs over the life of the assets. 

Operations and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Recoveries, which are recorded as revenue, are based on a formula that allows 

Atlanta Gas Light to recover operations and maintenance costs in excess of those included in its current base rates, depreciation, and an 

allowed rate of return on capital expenditures. However, Atlanta Gas Light is allowed the recovery of carrying costs on the under recovered 

balance resulting from the timing difference.

PRP

In 2015, Atlanta Gas Light began recovering incremental PRP surcharge amounts through three phased-in increases in addition to its 

already existing PRP surcharge amount, which was established to address recovery of the under recovered PRP balance of $144 million 

and the estimated amounts to be earned under the program through 2025. The unrecovered balance is the result of the continued 

revenue requirement earned under the program offset by the existing and incremental PRP surcharges. The under recovered balance at 

December 31, 2018 was $171 million, including $95 million of unrecognized equity return. The PRP surcharge will remain in effect until the 

earlier of the full recovery of the under recovered amount or December 31, 2025. See “Rate Proceedings” and “Unrecognized Ratemaking 

Amounts” herein for additional information.

One of the capital projects under the PRP experienced construction issues and Atlanta Gas Light was required to complete mitigation work 

prior to placing it in service. These mitigation costs were included in base rates in 2018. In 2017, Atlanta Gas Light recovered $20 million 

from the settlement of contractor litigation claims and recovered an additional $7 million from the final settlement of contractor litigation 

claims during the first quarter 2018. Mitigation costs recovered through the legal process are retained by Atlanta Gas Light.

Natural Gas Cost Recovery
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the natural gas distribution utilities are authorized by the relevant regulatory agencies in the 

states in which they serve to use natural gas cost recovery mechanisms that adjust rates to reflect changes in the wholesale cost of natural 

gas and ensure recovery of all costs prudently incurred in purchasing natural gas for customers. Natural gas cost recovery revenues are 

adjusted for differences in actual recoverable natural gas costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Changes in the billing factor 

will not have a significant effect on Southern Company’s or Southern Company Gas’ revenues or net income, but will affect cash flows.

Rate Proceedings

Nicor Gas

On January 31, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved a $137 million increase in annual base rate revenues, including $93 million related 

to the recovery of investments under the Investing in Illinois program, effective February 8, 2018, based on a ROE of 9.8%.

On April 19, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas’ variable income tax adjustment rider. This rider provides for refund or 

recovery of changes in income tax expense that result from income tax rates that differ from those used in Nicor Gas’ last rate case. 

Customer refunds, via bill credits, related to the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation from January 25, 2018 through May 4, 2018 began 

on July 1, 2018 and are expected to conclude in the second quarter 2019.

On May 2, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas’ rehearing request for revised base rates to incorporate the reduction in the 

federal income tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. The resulting decrease of approximately $44 million in annual base rate 

revenues became effective May 5, 2018. Nicor Gas’ previously-authorized capital structure and ROE of 9.80% were not addressed in the 

rehearing and remain unchanged.

On November 9, 2018, Nicor Gas filed a general base rate case with the Illinois Commission requesting a $230 million increase in annual 

base rate revenues. The requested increase is based on a projected test year for the 12-month period ending September 30, 2020, a ROE 

of 10.6%, and an increase in the equity ratio from 52.0% to 54.0% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax 

Reform Legislation. The Illinois Commission is expected to rule on the requested increase within the 11-month statutory time limit, after 

which rate adjustments will be effective. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

Atlanta Gas Light

On February 23, 2018, Atlanta Gas Light revised its annual base rate filing to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation and 

requested a $16 million rate reduction in 2018. On May 15, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation for Atlanta Gas Light’s annual 

base rates to remain at the 2017 level for 2018 and 2019, with customer credits of $8 million in each of July 2018 and October 2018 to 

reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Georgia PSC maintained Atlanta Gas Light’s previously authorized earnings band 

126

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

based on a ROE between 10.55% and 10.95% and increased the allowed equity ratio by 4% to an equity ratio of 55% to address the 

negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Additionally, Atlanta Gas Light is required to file a traditional 

base rate case on or before June 1, 2019 for rates effective January 1, 2020.

Atlanta Gas Light’s recovery of the previously unrecovered PRP revenue through 2014, as well as the mitigation costs associated with the 

PRP that were not previously included in its rates, were included in GRAM. In connection with the GRAM approval, the last monthly PRP 

surcharge increase became effective March 1, 2017.

Virginia Natural Gas

On December 21, 2017, the Virginia Commission approved a settlement for a $34 million increase in annual base rate revenues, effective 

September 1, 2017, including $13 million related to the recovery of investments under the SAVE program. See “Regulatory Infrastructure 

Programs” herein for additional information. An authorized ROE range of 9.0% to 10.0% with a midpoint of 9.5% will be used to determine 

the revenue requirement in any filing, other than for a change in base rates.

On December 17, 2018, the Virginia Commission approved Virginia Natural Gas’ annual information form filing, which reduced annual base 

rates by $14 million effective January 1, 2019 due to lower tax expense as a result of the lower corporate income tax rate and the impact 

of the flowback of excess deferred income taxes. This approval also requires Virginia Natural Gas to issue customer refunds, via bill credits, 

for the entire $14 million which was deferred as a regulatory liability, current, on the balance sheet at December 31, 2018. These customer 

refunds are expected to be completed in the first quarter 2019.

energySMART
The Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas’ energySMART program, which includes energy efficiency program offerings and therm 

reduction goals. Through December 31, 2017, Nicor Gas spent $107 million of the initial authorized expenditure of $113 million. A new 

program began on January 1, 2018, with an additional authorized expenditure of $160 million through 2021. Through December 31, 2018, 

Nicor Gas had spent $29 million.

Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts
The following table illustrates Southern Company Gas’ authorized ratemaking amounts that are not recognized on its balance sheets. These 

amounts are primarily composed of an allowed equity rate of return on assets associated with certain regulatory infrastructure programs. 

These amounts will be recognized as revenues in Southern Company Gas’ financial statements in the periods they are billable to customers, 

the majority of which will be recovered by 2025.

Atlanta Gas Light
Virginia Natural Gas
Nicor Gas
Total

FERC Matters

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

(in millions)

$ 95
11
4
$110

$104
11
2
$117

Open Access Transmission Tariff
On May 10, 2018, AMEA and Cooperative Energy filed with the FERC a complaint against SCS and the traditional electric operating 

companies claiming that the current 11.25% base ROE used in calculating the annual transmission revenue requirements of the traditional 

electric operating companies’ open access transmission tariff is unjust and unreasonable as measured by the applicable FERC standards. 

The complaint requested that the base ROE be set no higher than 8.65% and that the FERC order refunds for the difference in revenue 

requirements that results from applying a just and reasonable ROE established in this proceeding upon determining the current ROE is 

unjust and unreasonable. On June 18, 2018, SCS and the traditional electric operating companies filed their response challenging the 

adequacy of the showing presented by the complainants and offering support for the current ROE. On September 6, 2018, the FERC issued 

an order establishing a refund effective date of May 10, 2018 in the event a refund is due and initiating an investigation and settlement 

procedures regarding the current base ROE. Through December 31, 2018, the estimated maximum potential refund is not expected to be 

material to Southern Company’s or the traditional electric operating companies’ results of operations or cash flows. The ultimate outcome 

of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

127

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Mississippi Power

Municipal and Rural Associations Tariff

Mississippi Power provides wholesale electric service to Cooperative Energy, East Mississippi Electric Power Association, and the City of 

Collins, all located in southeastern Mississippi, under a long-term cost-based, FERC-regulated MRA tariff.

In 2016, Mississippi Power reached a settlement agreement with its wholesale customers, which was subsequently approved by the 

FERC, for an increase in wholesale base revenues under the MRA cost-based electric tariff, primarily as a result of placing scrubbers for 

Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2 in service in 2015. The settlement agreement became effective for services rendered beginning May 1, 2016, 

resulting in an estimated annual revenue increase of $7 million under the MRA cost-based electric tariff. Additionally, under the settlement 

agreement, the tariff customers agreed to similar regulatory treatment for MRA tariff ratemaking as the treatment approved for retail 

ratemaking under the In-Service Asset Rate Order. This regulatory treatment primarily included (i) recovery of the operational Kemper 

County energy facility assets providing service to customers and other related costs, (ii) amortization of the Kemper County energy 

facility-related regulatory assets included in rates under the settlement agreement over the 36 months ending April 30, 2019, (iii) Kemper 

County energy facility-related expenses included in rates under the settlement agreement no longer being deferred and charged to 

expense, and (iv) removing all of the Kemper County energy facility CWIP from rate base with a corresponding increase in accrual of 

AFUDC, which totaled approximately $22 million through the suspension of Kemper IGCC start-up activities.

Mississippi Power expects to reach a subsequent settlement agreement with its wholesale customers and will make a filing with the FERC 

during the first quarter 2019. The settlement agreement is intended to be consistent with the Kemper Settlement Agreement, including the 

impact of the Tax Reform Legislation. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

In September 2017, Mississippi Power and Cooperative Energy executed a Shared Service Agreement (SSA), as part of the MRA tariff, under 

which Mississippi Power and Cooperative Energy will share in providing electricity to all Cooperative Energy delivery points, in lieu of the 

current arrangement under which each delivery point is specifically assigned to either entity. The SSA accepted by the FERC in October 

2017 became effective on January 1, 2018 and may be cancelled by Cooperative Energy with 10 years notice after December 31, 2020. 

The SSA provides Cooperative Energy the option to decrease its use of Mississippi Power’s generation services under the MRA tariff, subject 

to annual and cumulative caps and a one-year notice requirement. In the event Cooperative Energy elects to reduce these services, the 

related reduction in Mississippi Power’s revenues is not expected to be significant through 2020.

Fuel Cost Recovery

Mississippi Power has a wholesale MRA and a Market Based (MB) fuel cost recovery factor. Effective with the first billing cycle for 

January 2018, fuel rates increased $11 million annually for wholesale MRA customers and $1 million annually for wholesale MB customers. 

Effective January 1, 2019, the wholesale MRA fuel rate decreased $16 million annually and the wholesale MB fuel rate decreased by an 

immaterial amount. At December 31, 2018, over recovered wholesale MRA fuel costs included in other regulatory liabilities, current on 

the balance sheet were approximately $6 million compared to an immaterial amount at December 31, 2017. Under recovered wholesale 

MB fuel costs included in the balance sheets were immaterial at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Mississippi Power’s operating revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel cost and amounts billed in accordance with 

the currently approved cost recovery rate. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor should have no significant effect on Mississippi Power’s 
revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow.

Southern Company Gas
At December 31, 2018, Southern Company Gas was involved in two gas pipeline construction projects. These projects, along with 

Southern Company Gas’ existing pipelines, are intended to provide diverse sources of natural gas supplies to customers, resolve current 

and long-term supply planning for new capacity, enhance system reliability, and generate economic development in the areas served.

On January 19, 2018, the PennEast Pipeline received FERC approval. Work continues with state and federal agencies to obtain the required 

permits to begin construction. Any material delays may impact forecasted capital expenditures and the expected in-service date.

In October 2017, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline received FERC approval. This joint venture has experienced challenges to its permits since 

construction began in 2018. During the third and fourth quarters 2018, a FERC stop work order, together with delays in obtaining 

permits necessary for construction and construction delays due to judicial actions, impacted the cost and schedule for the project. As 

a result, total project cost estimates have increased from between $6.0 billion and $6.5 billion to between $7.0 billion and $7.8 billion, 

excluding financing costs. Southern Company Gas’ share of the total project costs is 5% and Southern Company Gas’ investment at 

December 31, 2018 totaled $83 million. The operator of the joint venture currently expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for at 

least key segments of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, while the remainder may extend into early 2021. Southern Company Gas has evaluated 

the recoverability of its investment and determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. Abnormal weather, work delays 

128

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

(including due to judicial or regulatory action), and other conditions may result in additional cost or schedule modifications, which could 

result in an impairment of Southern Company Gas’ investment and could have a material impact on Southern Company’s and Southern 

Company Gas’ financial statements.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Notes 7 and 9 under “Southern Company Gas – Equity 

Method Investments” and “Guarantees,” respectively, for additional information on these pipeline projects.

NOTE 3. CONTINGENCIES

General Litigation Matters
Each registrant is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the business activities of 

Southern Company’s subsidiaries are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as 

laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Litigation over environmental issues and claims 

of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws and 

regulations has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other 

emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.

The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation against each registrant and any subsidiaries cannot be predicted at this time; 

however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, 

arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on such registrant’s financial statements.

Southern Company
In January 2017, a putative securities class action complaint was filed against Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former 

Mississippi Power officers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, by Monroe County Employees’ 

Retirement System on behalf of all persons who purchased shares of Southern Company’s common stock between April 25, 2012 and 

October 29, 2013. The complaint alleges that Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers 

made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility in violation of certain provisions under the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The complaint seeks, among other things, compensatory damages and litigation costs and 

attorneys’ fees. In June 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that provided additional detail about their claims, increased the 

purported class period by one day, and added certain other former Mississippi Power officers as defendants. In July 2017, the defendants 

filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint with prejudice, to which the plaintiffs filed an opposition in September 2017. 

On March 29, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, issued an order granting, in part, the 

defendants’ motion to dismiss. The court dismissed certain claims against certain officers of Southern Company and Mississippi Power and 

dismissed the allegations related to a number of the statements that plaintiffs challenged as being false or misleading. On April 26, 2018, 

the defendants filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s order, seeking dismissal of the remaining claims in the lawsuit. On 

August 10, 2018, the court denied the motion for reconsideration and denied a motion to certify the issue for interlocutory appeal.

In February 2017, Jean Vineyard filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit and, in May 2017, Judy Mesirov filed a shareholder derivative 

lawsuit, each in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Each of these lawsuits names as defendants Southern Company, 
certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. In August 2017, these two shareholder 

derivative lawsuits were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The complaints allege that the 

defendants caused Southern Company to make false or misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility cost and 

schedule. Further, the complaints allege that the defendants were unjustly enriched and caused the waste of corporate assets and also 

allege that the individual defendants violated their fiduciary duties. Each plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, 

unspecified actual damages and, on each plaintiff’s own behalf, attorneys’ fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. Each plaintiff also seeks 

certain changes to Southern Company’s corporate governance and internal processes. On April 25, 2018, the court entered an order staying 

this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities 

class action.

In May 2017, Helen E. Piper Survivor’s Trust filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, State of 

Georgia that names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power 

officers. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants, among other things, breached their fiduciary duties in connection with 

schedule delays and cost overruns associated with the construction of the Kemper County energy facility. The complaint further alleges 

that the individual defendants authorized or failed to correct false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility 

schedule and cost and failed to implement necessary internal controls to prevent harm to Southern Company. The plaintiff seeks to recover, 

on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and disgorgement of profits and, on its behalf, attorneys’ fees and costs 

129

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

in bringing the lawsuit. The plaintiff also seeks certain unspecified changes to Southern Company’s corporate governance and internal 

processes. On May 4, 2018, the court entered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or 

any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities class action.

Southern Company believes these legal challenges have no merit; however, an adverse outcome in any of these proceedings could have an 

impact on Southern Company’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Southern Company will vigorously defend itself in 

these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.

Alabama Power
On March 2, 2018, the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) issued proposed administrative orders assessing a 

penalty of $1.25 million to Alabama Power for unpermitted discharge of fluids and/or pollutants to groundwater at five electric generating 

plants. The orders were finalized and Alabama Power paid the penalty on September 27, 2018. This matter is now concluded.

Georgia Power
In 2011, plaintiffs filed a putative class action against Georgia Power in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia alleging that Georgia 

Power’s collection in rates of amounts for municipal franchise fees (which fees are paid to municipalities) exceeded the amounts allowed 

in orders of the Georgia PSC and alleging certain state tort law claims. In 2016, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s 

previous dismissal of the case and remanded the case to the trial court. Georgia Power filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the 

Georgia Supreme Court, which was granted in August 2017. On June 18, 2018, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of 

the Georgia Court of Appeals and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Following a motion by Georgia Power, on 

February 13, 2019, the Superior Court of Fulton County entered an order staying this lawsuit for 60 days and ordered the parties to submit 

petitions to the Georgia PSC within 20 days for a declaratory ruling to address certain terms the court previously held were ambiguous as 

used in the Georgia PSC’s orders. The order entered by the Superior Court of Fulton County also conditionally certified the proposed class. 

Georgia Power believes the plaintiffs’ claims have no merit and will continue to vigorously defend itself in this matter. The amount of any 

possible losses cannot be calculated at this time because, among other factors, it is unknown whether conditional class certification will 

be upheld and the ultimate composition of any class; and whether any losses would be subject to recovery from any municipalities. The 

ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

Mississippi Power
In 2016, a complaint against Mississippi Power was filed in Harrison County Circuit Court (Circuit Court) by Biloxi Freezing & Processing Inc., 

Gulfside Casino Partnership, and John Carlton Dean, which was amended and refiled to include, among other things, Southern Company 

as a defendant. The individual plaintiff alleged that Mississippi Power and Southern Company violated the Mississippi Unfair Trade 

Practices Act. All plaintiffs alleged that Mississippi Power and Southern Company concealed, falsely represented, and failed to fully disclose 

important facts concerning the cost and schedule of the Kemper County energy facility and that these alleged breaches unjustly enriched 

Mississippi Power and Southern Company. The plaintiffs sought unspecified actual damages and punitive damages; asked the Circuit 

Court to appoint a receiver to oversee, operate, manage, and otherwise control all affairs relating to the Kemper County energy facility; 

asked the Circuit Court to revoke any licenses or certificates authorizing Mississippi Power or Southern Company to engage in any business 

related to the Kemper County energy facility in Mississippi; and sought attorney’s fees, costs, and interest. The plaintiffs also sought an 

injunction to prevent any Kemper County energy facility costs from being charged to customers through electric rates. In June 2017, the 

Circuit Court ruled in favor of motions by Southern Company and Mississippi Power and dismissed the case. In July 2017, the plaintiffs filed 

notice of an appeal. On July 13, 2018, Mississippi Power and Southern Company reached a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs and 

the plaintiffs’ appeal was dismissed with prejudice. The settlement had no material impact on Southern Company’s or Mississippi Power’s 

financial statements.

On May 18, 2018, Southern Company and Mississippi Power received a notice of dispute and arbitration demand filed by Martin Product 

Sales, LLC (Martin) based on two agreements, both related to Kemper IGCC byproducts for which Mississippi Power provided termination 

notices in September 2017. Martin alleges breach of contract, breach of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and misrepresentation, and 

civil conspiracy and makes a claim for damages in the amount of approximately $143 million, as well as additional unspecified damages, 

attorney’s fees, costs, and interest. In the first quarter 2019, Mississippi Power and Southern Company filed motions to dismiss. Southern 

Company and Mississippi Power believe this legal challenge has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in this proceeding could have a 

material impact on Southern Company’s and Mississippi Power’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Southern Company 

and Mississippi Power will vigorously defend themselves in this matter, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.

On November 21, 2018, Ray C. Turnage and 10 other individual plaintiffs filed a putative class action complaint against Mississippi Power 

and the three current members of the Mississippi PSC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. Mississippi Power 
received Mississippi PSC approval in 2013 to charge a mirror CWIP rate premised upon including in its rate base pre-construction and 

130

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

construction costs for the Kemper IGCC prior to placing the Kemper IGCC into service. The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed that approval 

and ordered Mississippi Power to refund the amounts paid by customers under the previously-approved mirror CWIP rate. The plaintiffs 

allege that the initial approval process, and the amount approved, were improper. They also allege that Mississippi Power underpaid 

customers in the refund process because it applied the wrong interest rate to the payments. The plaintiffs seek to recover, on behalf of 

themselves and their putative class, actual damages, punitive damages, pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest, attorney’s fees, and 

costs. Mississippi Power believes this legal challenge has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in this proceeding could have a material 

impact on Mississippi Power’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Mississippi Power will vigorously defend itself in this 

matter, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.

Southern Power
Southern Power indirectly owns a 51% membership interest in RE Roserock LLC (Roserock), the owner of the Roserock facility in Pecos 
County, Texas. Prior to the facility being placed in service in November 2016, certain solar panels were damaged during installation by the 
construction contractor, McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. (McCarthy), and certain solar panels were damaged by a hail event that also 
occurred during construction. In connection therewith, Southern Power is withholding payments of approximately $26 million from the 
construction contractor, which has placed a lien on the Roserock facility for the same amount. In May 2017, Roserock filed a lawsuit in the 
state district court in Pecos County, Texas, (State Court lawsuit) against XL Insurance America, Inc. (XL) and North American Elite Insurance 
Company (North American Elite) seeking recovery from an insurance policy for damages resulting from the hail storm and McCarthy’s 
installation practices. On June 1, 2018, the court in the State Court lawsuit granted Roserock’s motion for partial summary judgment, 
finding that the insurers were in breach of contract and in violation of the Texas Insurance Code for failing to pay any monies owed for the 
hail claim. In addition to the State Court lawsuit, lawsuits were filed between Roserock and McCarthy, as well as other parties, and that 
litigation has been consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Southern Power intends to vigorously pursue 
and defend these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.

Southern Company Gas
Nicor Energy Services Company, doing business as Pivotal Home Solutions, formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas, 
was a defendant in a putative class action initially filed in 2017 in the state court in Indiana. The plaintiffs purported to represent a class 
of the customers who purchased products from Nicor Energy Services Company and alleged that the marketing, sale, and billing of the 
products violated the Indiana Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, constituting common law fraud and resulting in unjust 
enrichment of these entities. In 2018, Nicor Energy Services Company was named in a second class action filed in the state court of Ohio 
asserting nearly identical allegations and legal claims. The plaintiffs sought, on behalf of the classes they purported to represent, actual and 
punitive damages, interest costs, attorney fees, and injunctive relief. To facilitate the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions, Southern Company 
Gas retained most of the financial responsibility for these lawsuits following the completion of the sale. On June 12, 2018, the parties 
settled these claims and Southern Company Gas recorded an $11 million charge, which is included in other operations and maintenance 
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Southern Company Gas is involved in litigation relating to an incident that occurred in one of its prior service territories that resulted 
in several deaths, injuries, and property damage. Southern Company Gas has resolved all claims for personal injuries or death, but it is 
continuing to defend litigation seeking to recover alleged property damages. Southern Company Gas has insurance that provides full 
coverage of the expected financial exposure in excess of $11 million per incident. During the successor period ended December 31, 2016, 
Southern Company Gas recorded reserves for substantially all of its potential exposure from these cases.

Environmental Remediation
The Southern Company system must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and 
releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Southern Company system could incur substantial costs to 
clean up affected sites. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities conduct studies to determine 
the extent of any required cleanup and have recognized the estimated costs to clean up known impacted sites in the financial statements. 
A liability for environmental remediation costs is recognized only when a loss is determined to be probable and reasonably estimable. The 
traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities in Illinois and Georgia have each received authority from 
their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies to recover approved environmental compliance costs through 
regulatory mechanisms. These regulatory mechanisms are adjusted annually or as necessary within limits approved by the state PSCs or 
other applicable state regulatory agencies. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the environmental remediation liabilities of Alabama Power 
and Mississippi Power were immaterial.

Georgia Power has been designated or identified as a potentially responsible party at sites governed by the Georgia Hazardous Site 
Response Act and/or by the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, and assessment and 
potential cleanup of such sites is expected. In 2013, the Georgia PSC approved the 2013 ARP including the recovery of approximately 

131

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

$2 million annually through the ECCR tariff. Georgia Power recognizes a liability for environmental remediation costs only when it 
determines a loss is probable and reasonably estimable and reduces the reserve as expenditures are incurred. Any difference between the 
liabilities accrued and costs recovered through rates is deferred as a regulatory asset or liability. The annual recovery amount is expected to 
be adjusted as part of the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case and further adjusted in future regulatory proceedings.

Southern Company Gas is subject to environmental remediation liabilities associated with 40 former MGP sites in four different states. 
Southern Company Gas’ accrued environmental remediation liability at December 31, 2018 and 2017 was based on the estimated cost 
of environmental investigation and remediation associated with known current and former MGP operating sites. These environmental 
remediation expenditures are recoverable from customers through rate mechanisms approved by the applicable state regulatory agencies 
of the natural gas distribution utilities, with the exception of one site representing $2 million of the accrued remediation costs.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the environmental remediation liability and the balance of under recovered environmental remediation 

costs were reflected in the balance sheets as follows:

December 31, 2018:
Environmental remediation liability:

Other current liabilities
Accrued environmental remediation

Under recovered environmental remediation costs:

Other regulatory assets, current
Other regulatory assets, deferred

December 31, 2017:
Environmental remediation liability:

Other current liabilities
Accrued environmental remediation(*)

Under recovered environmental remediation costs:

Other regulatory assets, current
Other regulatory assets, deferred

Southern 
Company

Georgia
Power

(in millions)

Southern 
Company Gas

$ 49
268

$ 21
345

$ 73
389

$ 38
473

$23
—

$ 2
53

$22
—

$ 2
47

$ 26
268

$ 19
292

$ 46
342

$ 31
379

(*)  At December 31, 2017, $85 million of Southern Company Gas’ total environmental remediation liability related to Elizabethtown Gas, which was sold on 

July 1, 2018. See Note 15 under “Southern Company Gas” for more information regarding Southern Company Gas’ sale of Elizabethtown Gas.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time; however, as a result of the regulatory treatment for 

environmental remediation expenses described above, the final disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material impact on 

the financial statements of Southern Company, Georgia Power, or Southern Company Gas.

Nuclear Fuel Disposal Costs
Acting through the DOE and pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the U.S. government entered into contracts with Alabama 

Power and Georgia Power that require the DOE to dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high level radioactive waste generated at Plants 

Farley, Hatch, and Vogtle Units 1 and 2 beginning no later than January 31, 1998. The DOE has yet to commence the performance of 

its contractual and statutory obligation to dispose of spent nuclear fuel. Consequently, Alabama Power and Georgia Power pursued and 

continue to pursue legal remedies against the U.S. government for its partial breach of contract.

In 2014, Alabama Power and Georgia Power filed lawsuits against the U.S. government for the costs of continuing to store spent nuclear 

fuel at Plants Farley, Hatch, and Vogtle Units 1 and 2 for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013. The damage period 

was subsequently extended to December 31, 2014. In October 2017, Alabama Power and Georgia Power filed additional lawsuits against 

the U.S. government in the Court of Federal Claims for the costs of continuing to store spent nuclear fuel at Plants Farley, Hatch, and Vogtle 

Units 1 and 2 for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017. Damages will continue to accumulate until the issue is 

resolved, the U.S. government disposes of Alabama Power’s and Georgia Power’s spent nuclear fuel pursuant to its contractual obligations, 

or alternative storage is otherwise provided. No amounts have been recognized in the financial statements as of December 31, 2018 for 

any potential recoveries from the pending lawsuits. The final outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, 

Alabama Power and Georgia Power expect to credit any recoveries back for the benefit of customers in accordance with direction 

from their respective PSC and, therefore, no material impact on Southern Company’s, Alabama Power’s, or Georgia Power’s net income 

is expected.

132

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

On-site dry spent fuel storage facilities are operational at all three plants and can be expanded to accommodate spent fuel through the 

expected life of each plant.

Nuclear Insurance
Under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act (Act), Alabama Power and Georgia Power maintain agreements of indemnity with the NRC 

that, together with private insurance, cover third-party liability arising from any nuclear incident occurring at the companies’ nuclear 

power plants. The Act provides funds up to $14.1 billion for public liability claims that could arise from a single nuclear incident. Each 

nuclear plant is insured against this liability to a maximum of $450 million by American Nuclear Insurers (ANI), with the remaining coverage 

provided by a mandatory program of deferred premiums that could be assessed, after a nuclear incident, against all owners of commercial 

nuclear reactors. A company could be assessed up to $138 million per incident for each licensed reactor it operates but not more than an 

aggregate of $20 million per incident to be paid in a calendar year for each reactor. Such maximum assessment, excluding any applicable 

state premium taxes, for Alabama Power and Georgia Power, based on its ownership and buyback interests in all licensed reactors, is 

$275 million and $267 million, respectively, per incident, but not more than an aggregate of $41 million and $40 million, respectively, to 

be paid for each incident in any one year. Both the maximum assessment per reactor and the maximum yearly assessment are adjusted 

for inflation at least every five years. The next scheduled adjustment is due no later than September 10, 2023. See Note 5 under “Joint 

Ownership Agreements” for additional information on joint ownership agreements.

Alabama Power and Georgia Power are members of Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL), a mutual insurer established to provide 

property damage insurance in an amount up to $1.5 billion for members’ operating nuclear generating facilities. Additionally, both 

companies have NEIL policies that currently provide decontamination, excess property insurance, and premature decommissioning coverage 

up to $1.25 billion for nuclear losses and policies providing coverage up to $750 million for non-nuclear losses in excess of the $1.5 billion 

primary coverage.

NEIL also covers the additional costs that would be incurred in obtaining replacement power during a prolonged accidental outage at a 

member’s nuclear plant. Members can purchase this coverage, subject to a deductible waiting period of up to 26 weeks, with a maximum 

per occurrence per unit limit of $490 million. After the deductible period, weekly indemnity payments would be received until either the 

unit is operational or until the limit is exhausted. Alabama Power and Georgia Power each purchase limits based on the projected full cost 

of replacement power, subject to ownership limitations, and have each elected a 12-week deductible waiting period for each nuclear plant.

A builders’ risk property insurance policy has been purchased from NEIL for the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. This policy 

provides the Vogtle Owners up to $2.75 billion for accidental property damage occurring during construction.

Under each of the NEIL policies, members are subject to assessments each year if losses exceed the accumulated funds available to the 

insurer. The maximum annual assessments for Alabama Power and Georgia Power as of December 31, 2018 under the NEIL policies would 

be $56 million and $85 million, respectively.

Claims resulting from terrorist acts are covered under both the ANI and NEIL policies (subject to normal policy limits). The aggregate, 

however, that NEIL will pay for all claims resulting from terrorist acts in any 12-month period is $3.2 billion plus such additional amounts 

NEIL can recover through reinsurance, indemnity, or other sources.

For all on-site property damage insurance policies for commercial nuclear power plants, the NRC requires that the proceeds of such policies 

shall be dedicated first for the sole purpose of placing the reactor in a safe and stable condition after an accident. Any remaining proceeds 

are to be applied next toward the costs of decontamination and debris removal operations ordered by the NRC, and any further remaining 

proceeds are to be paid either to the applicable company or to its debt trustees as may be appropriate under the policies and applicable 

trust indentures. In the event of a loss, the amount of insurance available might not be adequate to cover property damage and other 

expenses incurred. Uninsured losses and other expenses, to the extent not recovered from customers, would be borne by Alabama Power 

or Georgia Power, as applicable, and could have a material effect on Southern Company’s, Alabama Power’s, and Georgia Power’s financial 

condition and results of operations.

All retrospective assessments, whether generated for liability, property, or replacement power, may be subject to applicable state 

premium taxes.

Other Matters

Mississippi Power
In 2013, Mississippi Power submitted a lost revenue claim under the Deep Horizon Economic and Property Damages Settlement Agreement 

associated with the oil spill that occurred in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. On May 14, 2018, Mississippi Power’s claim was settled. 

The settlement proceeds of $18 million, net of expenses and income tax, are included in Mississippi Power’s earnings for 2018. As of 
December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power had received half of the settlement proceeds.

133

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Southern Company Gas
A wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas owns and operates a natural gas storage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns 

in Louisiana. Periodic integrity tests are required in accordance with rules of the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR). In 

August 2017, in connection with an ongoing integrity project, updated seismic mapping indicated the proximity of one of the caverns to 

the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. 

At December 31, 2018, the facility’s property, plant, and equipment had a net book value of $109 million, of which the cavern itself 

represents approximately 20%. A potential early retirement of this cavern is dependent upon several factors including compliance with an 

order from the Louisiana DNR detailing the requirements to place the cavern back in service, which includes, among other things, obtaining 

core samples to determine the composition of the sheath surrounding the edge of the salt dome.

The cavern continues to maintain its pressures and overall structural integrity. These events were considered in connection with Southern 

Company Gas’ annual long-lived asset impairment analysis, which determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. Any 

changes in results of monitoring activities, rates at which expiring capacity contracts are re-contracted, timing of placing the cavern back in 

service, or Louisiana DNR requirements could trigger impairment. Further, early retirement of the cavern could trigger impairment of other 

long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time, 

but could have a significant impact on Southern Company’s or Southern Company Gas’ financial statements.

NOTE 4. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

The registrants generate revenues from a variety of sources, some of which are excluded from the scope of ASC 606, such as leases, 

derivatives, and certain cost recovery mechanisms. See Note 1 under “Recently Adopted Accounting Standards – Revenue” for additional 

information on the adoption of ASC 606 for revenue from contracts with customers and under “Revenues” for additional information on 

the revenue policies of the registrants.

The following tables disaggregate revenue sources for the year ended December 31, 2018:

Southern Company

Operating revenues

Retail electric revenues(a)

Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other

Natural gas distribution revenues
Alternative revenue programs(b)
Total retail electric and gas distribution revenues
Wholesale energy revenues(c)(d)
Wholesale capacity revenues(d)
Other natural gas revenues(e)
Other revenues(f)

Total operating revenues

2018
(in millions)

$ 6,608
5,266
3,224
124
3,175
(20)
$ 18,377
1,896
620
699
1,903
$ 23,495

(a)  Retail electric revenues include $75 million of leases and a net increase of $60 million from certain cost recovery mechanisms that are not accounted for as 

revenue under ASC 606. See Note 2 for additional information on cost recovery mechanisms.

(b)  See Note 1 under “Revenues” for additional information on alternative revenue programs at the natural gas distribution utilities. Alternative revenue 

program revenues are presented net of any previously recognized program amounts billed to customers during the same accounting period.
(c)  Wholesale energy revenues include $299 million of revenues accounted for as derivatives, primarily related to short-term physical energy sales 
in the wholesale electricity market. See Note 1 under “Revenues – Southern Power” and Note 14 for additional information on energy-related 
derivative contracts.

(d)  Wholesale energy and wholesale capacity revenues include $384 million and $121 million, respectively, of PPA contracts accounted for as leases.
(e)  Other natural gas revenues related to Southern Company Gas’ energy and risk management activities are presented net of the related costs of those 

activities and include gross third-party revenues of $7.0 billion of which $3.9 billion relates to contracts that are accounted for as derivatives. See Note 16 
under “Southern Company Gas” for additional information on the components of wholesale gas services operating revenues.

(f)  Other revenues include $322 million of revenues not accounted for under ASC 606.

134

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Operating revenues
Retail revenues(a)(b)

Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other

Total retail electric revenues
Wholesale energy revenues(c)
Wholesale capacity revenues
Other revenues(b)(d)
Total operating revenues

Alabama
Power

$2,335
1,578
1,428
26
$5,367
297
101
267
$6,032

2018
Georgia
Power

(in millions)

$3,301
3,023
1,344
84
$7,752
133
54
481
$8,420

Mississippi 
Power

$ 273
286
321
9
$ 889
348
6
22
$1,265

(a)  Retail revenues at Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power include a net increase or (net reduction) of $152 million, $(19) million, and 

$(13) million, respectively, related to certain cost recovery mechanisms that are not accounted for as revenue under ASC 606. See Note 2 for additional 
information on cost recovery mechanisms.

(b)  Retail revenues and other revenues at Georgia Power include $74 million and $135 million, respectively, of revenues accounted for as leases.
(c)  Wholesale energy revenues at Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power include $20 million, $29 million, and $4 million, respectively, 

accounted for as derivatives primarily related to short-term physical energy sales in the wholesale electricity market. See Note 14 for additional 
information on energy-related derivative contracts.

(d)  Other revenues at Alabama Power and Georgia Power include $57 million and $109 million, respectively, of revenues not accounted for under ASC 606.

Southern Power

PPA capacity revenues(a)
PPA energy revenues(a)
Non-PPA revenues(b)
Other revenues

Total operating revenues

2018
(in millions)

$ 580
1,140
472
13
$ 2,205

(a)  PPA capacity revenues and PPA energy revenues include $186 million and $413 million, respectively, related to PPAs accounted for as leases. See Note 1 

under “Revenues – Southern Power” for additional information on capacity revenues accounted for as leases.

(b)  Non-PPA revenues include $242 million of revenues from short-term sales related to physical energy sales in the wholesale electricity market accounted for 

as derivatives. See Note 1 under “Revenues – Southern Power” and Note 14 for additional information on energy-related derivative contracts.

Southern Company Gas
Operating revenues

Natural gas distribution revenues

Residential
Commercial
Transportation
Industrial
Other

Alternative revenue programs(a)
Total natural gas distribution revenues
Gas pipeline investments
Wholesale gas services(b)
Gas marketing services(c)
Other revenues

Total operating revenues

2018
(in millions)

$ 1,525
436
944
40
230
(20)
$ 3,155
32
101
568
53
$ 3,909

(a)  See Note 1 under “Revenues – Southern Company Gas” for additional information on alternative revenue programs at the natural gas distribution 

utilities. Alternative revenue program revenues are presented net of any previously recognized program amounts billed to customers during the same 
accounting period.

135

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

(b)  Wholesale gas services revenues are presented net of the related costs associated with its energy trading and risk management activities. Operating 

revenues, as presented, include gross third-party revenues of $7.0 billion of which $3.9 billion relates to contracts that are accounted for as derivatives. 
See Note 16 under “Southern Company Gas” for additional information on the components of wholesale gas services operating revenues and Note 14 for 
additional information on energy-related derivative contracts.

(c)  Gas marketing services includes $3 million of revenues not accounted for under ASC 606.

Contract Balances
The following table reflects the closing balances of receivables, contract assets, and contract liabilities related to revenues from contracts 

with customers at December 31, 2018:

Southern Company
Alabama Power
Georgia Power
Mississippi Power
Southern Power
Southern Company Gas

Receivables

Contract Assets

Contract Liabilities

$2,630
520
721
100
118
952

(in millions)

$102
—
58
—
—
—

$32
12
7
—
11
2

As of December 31, 2018, Alabama Power had contract liabilities for outstanding performance obligations primarily related to extended 

service agreements. Georgia Power had contract assets primarily related to fixed retail customer bill programs where the payment is 

contingent upon Georgia Power’s continued performance and the customer’s continued participation in the program over the one-year 

contract term and to unregulated service agreements where payment is contingent upon project completion. Georgia Power also had 

contract liabilities for outstanding performance obligations primarily related to unregulated service agreements. Southern Power’s contract 

liabilities relate to collections recognized in advance of revenue for certain levelized PPAs with Georgia Power. Southern Company’s 

unregulated distributed generation business had $39 million and $11 million of contract assets and contract liabilities, respectively, at 

December 31, 2018 remaining for outstanding performance obligations.

Remaining Performance Obligations
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power have long-term contracts with customers in which revenues are 

recognized as performance obligations are satisfied over the contract term. These contracts primarily relate to PPAs whereby the traditional 

electric operating companies and Southern Power provide electricity and generation capacity to a customer. The revenue recognized for the 

delivery of electricity is variable; however, certain PPAs include a fixed payment for fixed generation capacity over the term of the contract. 

Southern Company’s unregulated distributed generation business also has partially satisfied performance obligations related to certain 

fixed price contracts. Revenues from contracts with customers related to these performance obligations remaining at December 31, 2018 

are expected to be recognized as follows:

Southern Company(*)
Alabama Power
Georgia Power
Mississippi Power
Southern Power

2019

$ 487
23
41
3
323

2020

$ 341
22
38
3
295

2021

$ 315
26
40
1
270

2022

(in millions)

$ 315
23
30
—
281

2023

$ 306
22
31
—
275

2024 and 
Thereafter

$2,103
140
82
—
2,028

(*)  Excludes amounts related to held for sale assets. See Note 15 under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” for additional information.

NOTE 5. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant, and equipment is stated at original cost or fair value at acquisition, as appropriate, less any regulatory disallowances and 

impairments. Original cost may include: materials; labor; minor items of property; appropriate administrative and general costs; payroll-

related costs such as taxes, pensions, and other benefits; and the interest capitalized and/or cost of equity funds used during construction.

136

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

The registrants’ property, plant, and equipment in service consisted of the following at December 31, 2018 and 2017:

At December 31, 2018:

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

(in millions)

Electric utilities:
Generation
Transmission
Distribution
General/other

Electric utilities’ plant in service
Southern Company Gas:

Natural gas distribution utilities 

transportation and distribution

Storage facilities
Other

Southern Company Gas plant in service
Other plant in service
Total plant in service

$ 52,324
11,344
18,746
4,446
86,860

12,409
1,640
1,128
15,177
1,669
$103,706

$16,533
4,380
7,389
2,100
30,402

—
—
—
—
—
$30,402

$19,145
6,156
10,389
1,985
37,675

—
—
—
—
—
$37,675

$2,849
769
968
314
4,900

—
—
—
—
—
$4,900

$13,246
—
—
25
13,271

—
—
—
—
—
$13,271

At December 31, 2017:

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

(in millions)

Electric utilities:
Generation
Transmission
Distribution
General/other

Electric utilities’ plant in service
Southern Company Gas:

Natural gas distribution utilities 

transportation and distribution

Storage facilities
Other

Southern Company Gas plant in service
Other plant in service
Total plant in service

$ 51,279
11,562
19,239
4,402
86,482

13,079
1,599
1,155
15,833
1,227
$103,542

$ 14,213
4,119
7,034
1,960
27,326

—
—
—
—
—
$ 27,326

$ 17,038
5,947
9,978
1,898
34,861

—
—
—
—
—
$ 34,861

$ 2,801
737
946
289
4,773

—
—
—
—
—
$ 4,773

$ 13,737
—
—
18
13,755

—
—
—
—
—
$ 13,755

Southern 
Company 
Gas

$

—
—
—
—
—

12,409
1,640
1,128
15,177
—
$15,177

Southern 
Company 
Gas

$

—
—
—
—
—

13,079
1,599
1,155
15,833
—
$ 15,833

The cost of replacements of property, exclusive of minor items of property, is capitalized. The cost of maintenance, repairs, and replacement 

of minor items of property is charged to other operations and maintenance expenses as incurred or performed with the exception of 

nuclear refueling costs and certain maintenance costs including those described below.

In accordance with orders from their respective state PSCs, Alabama Power and Georgia Power defer nuclear outage operations and 

maintenance expenses to a regulatory asset when the charges are incurred. Alabama Power amortizes the costs over a subsequent 

18-month period with Plant Farley’s fall outage cost amortization beginning in January of the following year and spring outage cost 

amortization beginning in July of the same year. Georgia Power amortizes its costs over each unit’s operating cycle, or 18 months for Plant 

Vogtle Units 1 and 2 and 24 months for Plant Hatch Units 1 and 2.

A portion of Mississippi Power’s railway track maintenance costs is charged to fuel stock and recovered through Mississippi Power’s 

fuel clause.

The portion of Southern Company Gas’ non-working gas used to maintain the structural integrity of natural gas storage facilities that is 

considered to be non-recoverable is recorded as depreciable property, plant, and equipment, while the recoverable or retained portion is 

recorded as non-depreciable property, plant, and equipment.

137

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Capital Leases
Assets acquired under a capital lease are included in property, plant, and equipment and are further detailed in the table below for the 
applicable registrants:

At December 31, 2018:
Office buildings
PPAs(*)
Computer-related equipment
Gas pipeline

Less: Accumulated amortization

Balance, net of amortization
At December 31, 2017:
Office buildings
PPAs(*)
Computer-related equipment
Gas pipeline

Less: Accumulated amortization

Balance, net of amortization

Southern 
Company

Georgia
Power

(in millions)

$216
—
43
7
(75)
$191

$216
—
51
6
(72)
$201

$ 61
144
—
—
(84)
$121

$ 61
144
—
—
(68)
$137

(*)  Represents Georgia Power’s affiliate PPAs with Southern Power. See Note 1 under “Affiliate Transactions” and Note 9 under “Fuel and Power Purchase 

Agreements – Affiliate” for additional information.

See Note 8 under “Long-term Debt – Capital Leases” for additional information.

Depreciation and Amortization
The traditional electric operating companies’ and Southern Company Gas’ depreciation of the original cost of utility plant in service is 
provided primarily by using composite straight-line rates. The approximate rates for 2018, 2017, and 2016 are as follows:

Alabama Power
Georgia Power
Mississippi Power(*)
Southern Company Gas

2018

3.0%
2.6%
4.1%
2.9%

2017

(percent)
2.9%
2.7%
3.7%
2.9%

2016

3.0%
2.8%
4.2%
2.8%

(*)  Mississippi Power’s decrease in 2017 is primarily the result of recording a loss on its lignite mine in June 2017.

Depreciation studies are conducted periodically to update the composite rates. These studies are filed with the respective state PSC and/or 
other applicable state and federal regulatory agencies for the traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities. 
In 2016, Alabama Power submitted an updated depreciation study to the FERC and received authorization to use the recommended rates 
beginning January 2017. The study was also provided to the Alabama PSC.

Under the terms of the 2013 ARP, Georgia Power amortized approximately $14 million annually from 2014 through 2016 of its remaining 
regulatory liability related to other cost of removal obligations.

Southern Company’s 2017 depreciation includes $34 million of reductions in depreciation recognized by Gulf Power under the terms of its 
2013 rate case settlement agreement with the Florida PSC.

When property, plant, and equipment subject to composite depreciation is retired or otherwise disposed of in the normal course of 
business, its original cost, together with the cost of removal, less salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation. For other property 
dispositions, the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet accounts, and a gain or loss is 
recognized. Minor items of property included in the original cost of the asset are retired when the related property unit is retired.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, accumulated depreciation for utility plant in service totaled $30.3 billion and $30.8 billion, respectively, 
for Southern Company and $4.3 billion and $4.5 billion, respectively, for Southern Company Gas.

Depreciation of the original cost of other plant in service is provided primarily on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives, which 
for Southern Company range up to 65 years and for Southern Company Gas range from five to 15 years for transportation equipment, 
40 to 60 years for storage facilities, and up to 65 years for other assets. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, accumulated depreciation 
for other plant in service totaled $766 million and $673 million, respectively, for Southern Company and $129 million and $75 million, 
respectively, for Southern Company Gas.

138

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Southern Power
Southern Power applies component depreciation, where depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line method over the 
estimated useful life of the asset. Certain of Southern Power’s generation assets related to natural gas-fired facilities are depreciated on a 
units-of-production basis, using hours or starts, to better match outage and maintenance costs to the usage of, and revenues from, these 
assets. The primary assets in Southern Power’s property, plant, and equipment are generating facilities, which generally have estimated 
useful lives as follows:

Southern Power Generating Facility
Natural gas
Biomass
Solar
Wind

Useful life

Up to 45 years
Up to 40 years
Up to 35 years
Up to 30 years

Southern Power reviews its estimated useful lives and salvage values on an ongoing basis. The results of these reviews could result in 
changes which could have a material impact on Southern Power’s net income in the near term.

When Southern Power’s depreciable property, plant, and equipment is retired, or otherwise disposed of in the normal course of business, 
the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation is removed and a gain or loss is recognized in the statements of income.

Joint Ownership Agreements
At December 31, 2018, the registrants’ percentage ownership and investment (exclusive of nuclear fuel) in jointly-owned facilities in 
commercial operation were as follows:

Facility (Type)

Alabama Power
Greene County (natural gas) Units 1 and 2
Plant Miller (coal) Units 1 and 2
Georgia Power
Plant Hatch (nuclear)
Plant Vogtle (nuclear) Units 1 and 2
Plant Scherer (coal) Units 1 and 2
Plant Scherer (coal) Unit 3
Plant Wansley (coal)
Rocky Mountain (pumped storage)
Mississippi Power
Greene County (natural gas) Units 1 and 2
Plant Daniel (coal) Units 1 and 2
Southern Company Gas
Dalton Pipeline (natural gas pipeline)

Percent 
Ownership

Plant in 
Service

Accumulated 
Depreciation

(in millions)

60.0%(a)
91.8(b)

50.1%(c)
45.7(c)
8.4(c)
75.0(c)
53.5(c)
25.4(d)

40.0%(a)
50.0(e)

$ 274
2,056

$1,569
3,804
266
1,238
1,179
184

$ 180
723

50.0%(f)

$ 270

$

71
619

$ 615
2,150
96
493
362
135

$

93
201

$

6

CWIP

$

1
138

$ 54
84
14
66
160
—

$

1
7

$ —

(a)  Jointly owned by Alabama Power and Mississippi Power and operated and maintained by Alabama Power.
(b)  Jointly owned with PowerSouth and operated and maintained by Alabama Power.
(c)  Georgia Power owns undivided interests in Plants Hatch, Vogtle Units 1 and 2, Scherer, and Wansley in varying amounts jointly with one or more of the 
following entities: OPC, MEAG Power, Dalton, Florida Power & Light Company, JEA, and Gulf Power. Georgia Power has been contracted to operate and 
maintain the plants as agent for the co-owners and is jointly and severally liable for third party claims related to these plants.

(d)  Jointly owned with OPC, which is the operator of the plant.
(e)  Jointly owned by Gulf Power and Mississippi Power. In accordance with the operating agreement, Mississippi Power acts as Gulf Power’s agent with respect 

to the operation and maintenance of these units.

(f)  Jointly owned with The Williams Companies, Inc. The Dalton Pipeline is a 115-mile natural gas pipeline that serves as an extension of the Transco 

natural gas pipeline system into northwest Georgia. Southern Company Gas also entered into an agreement to lease its 50% undivided ownership in the 
Dalton Pipeline that became effective when it was placed in service in August 2017. Under the lease, Southern Company Gas will receive approximately 
$26 million annually for an initial term of 25 years. The lessee is responsible for maintaining the pipeline during the lease term and for providing service to 
transportation customers under its FERC-regulated tariff.

Georgia Power also owns 45.7% of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which are currently under construction and had a CWIP balance of 
$4.5 billion at December 31, 2018. See Note 2 under “Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction” for additional information.

On December 4, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of its 65% ownership interest in Plant Stanton Unit A, which Southern Power 
previously jointly-owned with OUC, the FMPA, and the KUA, to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 under “Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas 
Plants” for additional information.

139

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

In conjunction with Southern Company’s sale of Gulf Power, Mississippi Power and Gulf Power have committed to seek a restructuring of 

their 50% undivided ownership interests in Plant Daniel such that each of them would, after the restructuring, own 100% of a generating 

unit. On January 15, 2019, Gulf Power provided notice to Mississippi Power that Gulf Power will retire its share of the generating 

capacity of Plant Daniel on January 15, 2024. Mississippi Power has the option to purchase Gulf Power’s ownership interest for $1 on 

January 15, 2024, provided that Mississippi Power exercises the option no later than 120 days prior to that date. Mississippi Power is 

assessing the potential operational and economic effects of Gulf Power’s notice. The ultimate outcome of these matters remains subject to 

completion of Mississippi Power’s evaluations and applicable regulatory approvals, including the FERC and the Mississippi PSC, and cannot 

now be determined. See Note 15 under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.

The registrants’ proportionate share of their jointly-owned facility operating expenses is included in the corresponding operating expenses 

in the statements of income and each registrant is responsible for providing its own financing.

Assets Subject to Lien
On October 2, 2018, the Mississippi PSC approved executed agreements between Mississippi Power and its largest retail customer, Chevron 

Products Company (Chevron), for Mississippi Power to continue providing retail service to the Chevron refinery in Pascagoula, Mississippi 

through 2038. The agreements grant Chevron a security interest in the co-generation assets, with a net book value of approximately 

$101 million at December 31, 2018, located at the refinery that is exercisable upon the occurrence of (i) certain bankruptcy events or 

(ii) other events of default coupled with specific reductions in steam output at the facility and a downgrade of Mississippi Power’s credit 

rating to below investment grade by two of the three rating agencies.

Under the terms of the PPA and the expansion PPA for Southern Power’s Plant Mankato, which was acquired in 2016, approximately 

$563 million of assets, primarily related to property, plant, and equipment, are subject to lien at December 31, 2018. See Note 15 under 

“Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants” for additional information regarding the proposed sale of Plant Mankato.

See Note 3 under “General Litigation Matters – Southern Power” for information regarding liens on Southern Power’s Roserock facility.

See Note 8 under “Secured Debt” for information regarding debt secured by certain assets of Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, and 

Southern Company Gas.

NOTE 6. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

AROs are computed as the present value of the estimated costs for an asset’s future retirement and are recorded in the period in which 

the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset’s useful 

life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays 

associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future 

cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities. Each traditional 

electric operating company and natural gas distribution utility has received accounting guidance from its state PSC or applicable state 

regulatory agency allowing the continued accrual or recovery of other retirement costs for long-lived assets that it does not have a legal 

obligation to retire. Accordingly, the accumulated removal costs for these obligations are reflected in the balance sheets as regulatory 

liabilities and amounts to be recovered are reflected in the balance sheets as regulatory assets.

The ARO liabilities for the traditional electric operating companies primarily relate to facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule, principally 

ash ponds. In addition, Alabama Power and Georgia Power have retirement obligations related to the decommissioning of nuclear facilities 

(Alabama Power’s Plant Farley and Georgia Power’s ownership interests in Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2). See “Nuclear 

Decommissioning” herein for additional information. The traditional electric operating companies also have AROs related to various landfill 

sites, asbestos removal, and underground storage tanks, as well as, for Alabama Power, disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain 

transformers and sulfur hexafluoride gas in certain substation breakers, for Georgia Power, gypsum cells, and for Mississippi Power, mine 

reclamation and water wells. The ARO liability for Southern Power primarily relates to Southern Power’s solar and wind facilities, which are 

located on long-term land leases requiring the restoration of land at the end of the lease.

The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas also have identified other retirement obligations, such as 

obligations related to certain electric transmission and distribution facilities, certain asbestos containing material within long-term assets 

not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, certain wireless communication towers, the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls 

in certain transformers, leasehold improvements, equipment on customer property, and property associated with the Southern Company 

system’s rail lines and natural gas pipelines. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the 

settlement timing for certain retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement 

obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these retirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient information 
becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the ARO.

140

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Southern Company and the traditional electric operating companies will continue to recognize in their respective statements of income 

allowed removal costs in accordance with regulatory treatment. Any differences between costs recognized in accordance with accounting 

standards related to asset retirement and environmental obligations and those reflected in rates are recognized as either a regulatory asset 

or liability in the balance sheets as ordered by the various state PSCs.

Details of the AROs included in the balance sheets are as follows:

Balance at December 31, 2016
Liabilities incurred
Liabilities settled
Accretion
Cash flow revisions
Balance at December 31, 2017
Liabilities incurred
Liabilities settled
Accretion
Cash flow revisions
Reclassification to held for sale
Balance at December 31, 2018

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

$4,514
16
(177)
179
292
$4,824
29
(244)
217
4,737
(169)
$9,394

$1,533
—
(26)
77
125
$1,709
—
(55)
106
1,450
—
$3,210

Georgia 
Power

(in millions)

$2,532
4
(120)
89
133
$2,638
27
(116)
94
3,186
—
$5,829

Mississippi 
 Power

Southern 
Power

$179
—
(23)
5
13
$174
—
(35)
5
16
—
$160

$64
6
—
4
4
$78
2
—
4
—
—
$84

In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded an increase of approximately $1.2 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule. Mississippi Power also 

recorded an increase of approximately $11 million to its AROs related to an ash pond at Plant Greene County, which is jointly-owned with 

Alabama Power. The revised cost estimates were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at plants operated 

by Alabama Power, including Plant Greene County. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power’s management completed its analysis 

of these studies which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management 

requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of 

work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material.

In December 2018, Georgia Power recorded an increase of approximately $3.1 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and the related 

state rule. During the second half of 2018, Georgia Power completed a strategic assessment related to its plans to close the ash ponds 

at all of its generating plants in compliance with the CCR Rule and the related state rule. This assessment included engineering and 

constructability studies related to design assumptions for ash pond closures and advanced engineering methods. The results indicated that 

additional closure costs will be required to close these ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of 

ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. These factors also impact the 

estimated timing of future cash outlays.

In June 2018, Alabama Power completed an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley. The estimated cost of 
decommissioning based on the study resulted in an increase in Alabama Power’s ARO liability of approximately $300 million. In December 

2018, Georgia Power completed updated decommissioning cost site studies for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. The estimated 

cost of decommissioning based on the studies resulted in an increase in Georgia Power’s ARO liability of approximately $130 million. See 

“Nuclear Decommissioning” below for additional information.

The 2018 reclassification of a portion of the ARO liability to liabilities held for sale by Southern Company represents the AROs related to 

Gulf Power. See Note 15 under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” and “Assets Held for Sale” for additional information.

In 2017, Alabama Power’s and Georgia Power’s cash flow revisions were primarily related to changes in closure strategy for ash ponds and 

landfills. Georgia Power’s cash flow revisions in 2017 also related to changes in closure strategy for gypsum cells. Mississippi Power’s cash 

flow revisions in 2017 primarily related to a revision in the closure date of its lignite mine. The liabilities settled in 2017 for Alabama Power, 

Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power were primarily related to ash pond closure activity.

The cost estimates for AROs related to the CCR Rule are based on information at December 31, 2018 using various assumptions related to 

closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with 

the CCR Rule requirements for closure. The traditional electric operating companies expect to continue to periodically update their ARO 

cost estimates, which could increase further, as additional information becomes available. Absent continued recovery of ARO costs through 

regulated rates, Southern Company’s and the traditional electric operating companies’ results of operations, cash flows, and financial 
condition could be materially impacted. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

141

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Nuclear Decommissioning
The NRC requires licensees of commercial nuclear power reactors to establish a plan for providing reasonable assurance of funds for future 

decommissioning. Alabama Power and Georgia Power have external trust funds (Funds) to comply with the NRC’s regulations. Use of the 

Funds is restricted to nuclear decommissioning activities. The Funds are managed and invested in accordance with applicable requirements 

of various regulatory bodies, including the NRC, the FERC, and state PSCs, as well as the IRS. While Alabama Power and Georgia Power are 

allowed to prescribe an overall investment policy to the Funds’ managers, neither Southern Company nor its subsidiaries or affiliates are 

allowed to engage in the day-to-day management of the Funds or to mandate individual investment decisions. Day-to-day management 

of the investments in the Funds is delegated to unrelated third-party managers with oversight by the management of Alabama Power and 

Georgia Power. The Funds’ managers are authorized, within certain investment guidelines, to actively buy and sell securities at their own 

discretion in order to maximize the return on the Funds’ investments. The Funds are invested in a tax-efficient manner in a diversified mix 

of equity and fixed income securities and are reported as trading securities.

Alabama Power and Georgia Power record the investment securities held in the Funds at fair value, as disclosed in Note 13, as management 

believes that fair value best represents the nature of the Funds. Gains and losses, whether realized or unrealized, are recorded in the 

regulatory liability for AROs in the balance sheets and are not included in net income or OCI. Fair value adjustments and realized gains and 

losses are determined on a specific identification basis.

The Funds at Georgia Power participate in a securities lending program through the managers of the Funds. Under this program, Georgia 

Power’s Funds’ investment securities are loaned to institutional investors for a fee. Securities loaned are fully collateralized by cash, letters 

of credit, and/or securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities. At December 31, 2018 and 

2017, approximately $27 million and $76 million, respectively, of the fair market value of Georgia Power’s Funds’ securities were on loan 

and pledged to creditors under the Funds’ managers’ securities lending program. The fair value of the collateral received was approximately 

$28 million and $77 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and can only be sold by the borrower upon the return of the 

loaned securities. The collateral received is treated as a non-cash item in the statements of cash flows.

Investment securities in the Funds for December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

At December 31, 2018:

Equity securities
Debt securities
Other securities
Total investment securities in the Funds

At December 31, 2017:

Equity securities
Debt securities
Other securities
Total investment securities in the Funds

Southern 
Company

Alabama
Power

(in millions)

Georgia
Power

$ 919
726
74
$1,719

$1,059
725
47
$1,831

$594
201
51
$846

$644
223
35
$902

$325
525
23
$873

$415
502
12
$929

These amounts exclude receivables related to investment income and pending investment sales and payables related to pending 

investment purchases. For Southern Company and Georgia Power, these amounts include Georgia Power’s investment securities pledged to 

creditors and collateral received and excludes payables related to Georgia Power’s securities lending program.

The fair value increases (decreases) of the Funds, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the Funds’ expenses, for 

2018, 2017, and 2016 are shown in the table below. The fair value increases (decreases) included unrealized gains (losses) on securities held 

in the Funds at each of December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, which are also shown in the table below.

Fair value increases (decreases)
2018
2017
2016
Unrealized gains (losses)
At December 31, 2018
At December 31, 2017
At December 31, 2016

142

Southern 
Company

Alabama
Power

(in millions)

Georgia
Power

$ (67)
233
114

$(183)
181
48

$ (38)
125
76

$ (96)
98
34

$ (29)
108
38

$ (87)
83
14

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

The investment securities held in the Funds continue to be managed with a long-term focus. Accordingly, all purchases and sales within the 

Funds are presented separately in the statements of cash flows as investing cash flows, consistent with the nature of the securities and 

purpose for which the securities were acquired.

For Alabama Power, approximately $17 million and $18 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, previously recorded in internal 

reserves is being transferred into the Funds through 2040 as approved by the Alabama PSC. The NRC’s minimum external funding requirements 

are based on a generic estimate of the cost to decommission only the radioactive portions of a nuclear unit based on the size and type of 

reactor. Alabama Power and Georgia Power have filed plans with the NRC designed to ensure that, over time, the deposits and earnings of the 

Funds will provide the minimum funding amounts prescribed by the NRC.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the accumulated provisions for the external decommissioning trust funds were as follows:

Alabama Power

Plant Farley

Georgia Power
Plant Hatch
Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2
Total

2018

2017

(in millions)

$846

$902

$547
326
$873

$583
346
$929

Site study cost is the estimate to decommission a specific facility as of the site study year. The decommissioning cost estimates are based 

on prompt dismantlement and removal of the plant from service. The actual decommissioning costs may vary from these estimates 

because of changes in the assumed date of decommissioning, changes in NRC requirements, or changes in the assumptions used in making 

these estimates. The estimated costs of decommissioning at December 31, 2018 based on the most current studies, which were each 

performed in 2018, were as follows:

Decommissioning periods:

Beginning year
Completion year

Site study costs:

Radiated structures
Spent fuel management
Non-radiated structures

Total site study costs

Plant 
Farley

2037
2076

$1,234
387
99
$1,720

Plant 
Hatch(*)

2034
2075

(in millions)

$ 734
172
56
$ 962

Plant  
Vogtle 
Units 1  
and 2(*)

2047
2079

$ 601
162
79
$ 842

(*)  Based on Georgia Power’s ownership interests.

For ratemaking purposes, Alabama Power’s decommissioning costs are based on the site study and Georgia Power’s decommissioning costs 

are based on the NRC generic estimate to decommission the radioactive portion of the facilities and the site study estimate for spent fuel 

management as of 2012. Significant assumptions used to determine these costs for ratemaking were an estimated inflation rate of 4.5% 

and 2.4% for Alabama Power and Georgia Power, respectively, and an estimated trust earnings rate of 7.0% and 4.4% for Alabama Power 

and Georgia Power, respectively.

Amounts previously contributed to the Funds for Plant Farley are currently projected to be adequate to meet the decommissioning 

obligations. Alabama Power will continue to provide site-specific estimates of the decommissioning costs and related projections of funds 

in the external trust to the Alabama PSC and, if necessary, would seek the Alabama PSC’s approval to address any changes in a manner 

consistent with NRC and other applicable requirements.

Under the 2013 ARP, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power’s annual decommissioning cost for ratemaking of $4 million and $2 million 

for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, respectively. Georgia Power expects the Georgia PSC to review and adjust, if necessary, the 

amounts collected in rates for nuclear decommissioning costs in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.

143

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

NOTE 7. CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES AND EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS

The registrants may hold ownership interests in a number of business ventures with varying ownership structures. Partnership interests 
and other variable interests are evaluated to determine if each entity is a VIE. If a venture is a VIE for which a registrant is the primary 
beneficiary, the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the entity are consolidated. The registrants reassess the conclusion as to 
whether an entity is a VIE upon certain occurrences, which are deemed reconsideration events.

For entities that are not determined to be VIEs, the registrants evaluate whether they have control or significant influence over the investee 
to determine the appropriate consolidation and presentation. Generally, entities under the control of a registrant are consolidated, and 
entities over which a registrant can exert significant influence, but which a registrant does not control, are accounted for under the equity 
method of accounting. However, the registrants may also invest in partnerships and limited liability companies that maintain separate 
ownership accounts. All such investments are required to be accounted for under the equity method unless the interest is so minor that 
there is virtually no influence over operating and financial policies, as are all investments in joint ventures.

Investments accounted for under the equity method are recorded within equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries in the balance 
sheets and, for Southern Company and Southern Company Gas, the equity income is recorded within earnings from equity method 
investments in the statements of income. See “SEGCO” and “Southern Company Gas” herein for additional information.

SEGCO
Alabama Power and Georgia Power own equally all of the outstanding capital stock of SEGCO, which owns electric generating units with 
a total rated capacity of 1,020 MWs, as well as associated transmission facilities. Alabama Power and Georgia Power account for SEGCO 
using the equity method; Southern Company consolidates SEGCO. SEGCO uses natural gas as the primary fuel source for 1,000 MWs of 
its generating capacity. The capacity of these units is sold equally to Alabama Power and Georgia Power. Alabama Power and Georgia 
Power make payments sufficient to provide for the operating expenses, taxes, interest expense, and a ROE. The share of purchased power 
included in purchased power, affiliates in the statements of income totaled $102 million in 2018, $76 million in 2017, and $55 million in 
2016 for Alabama Power and $105 million in 2018, $78 million in 2017, and $57 million in 2016 for Georgia Power.

SEGCO paid $18 million of dividends in 2018 and $24 million in each of 2017 and 2016, of which one-half of each was paid to each of 
Alabama Power and Georgia Power. In addition, Alabama Power and Georgia Power each recognize 50% of SEGCO’s net income.

Alabama Power, which owns and operates a generating unit adjacent to the SEGCO generating units, has a joint ownership agreement 
with SEGCO for the ownership of an associated gas pipeline. Alabama Power owns 14% of the pipeline with the remaining 86% owned 
by SEGCO.

See Note 9 under “Guarantees” for additional information regarding guarantees of Alabama Power and Georgia Power related to SEGCO.

Southern Power

Variable Interest Entities
Southern Power has certain wholly-owned subsidiaries that are determined to be VIEs. Southern Power is considered the primary 
beneficiary of these VIEs because it controls the most significant activities of the VIEs, including operating and maintaining the respective 
assets, and has the obligation to absorb expected losses of these VIEs to the extent of its equity interests.

SP Solar
On May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% limited partnership interest in SP Solar to Global Atlantic Financial Group 
Limited (Global Atlantic). See Note 15 under “Southern Power” for additional information. A wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Power 
is the general partner and holds a 1% ownership interest in SP Solar and another wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Power owns the 
remaining 66% ownership in SP Solar. SP Solar qualifies as a VIE since the arrangement is structured as a limited partnership and the 33% 
limited partner does not have substantive kick-out rights against the general partner. Southern Power previously consolidated SP Solar 
and will continue to do so as the primary beneficiary of the VIE since it controls the most significant activities of the partnership, including 
operating and maintaining its assets.

At December 31, 2018, SP Solar had total assets of $6.3 billion, total liabilities of $113 million, and noncontrolling interests of $1.2 billion. 
Cash distributions from SP Solar are allocated 67% to Southern Power and 33% to Global Atlantic in accordance with their partnership 
interest percentage. Under the terms of the limited partnership agreement, distributions without limited partner consent are limited to 
available cash and SP Solar is obligated to distribute all such available cash to its partners each quarter. Available cash includes all cash 
generated in the quarter subject to the maintenance of appropriate operating reserves.

Transfers and sales of the assets in the VIE are subject to limited partner consent and the liabilities do not have recourse to the general 
credit of Southern Power. Liabilities consist of customary working capital items and do not include any long-term debt.

144

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

SP Wind

On December 11, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax-equity interest in SP Wind to three financial investors. SP Wind owns 

eight operating wind farms. See Note 15 under “Southern Power” for additional information. Southern Power owns 100% of the class B 

membership interests and the three financial investors own 100% of the Class A membership interests. SP Wind qualifies as a VIE since the 

structure of the arrangement is similar to a limited partnership and the Class A members do not have substantive kick-out rights against 

Southern Power. Southern Power previously consolidated SP Wind and will continue to do so as the primary beneficiary of the VIE since it 

controls the most significant activities of the entity, including operating and maintaining its assets.

At December 31, 2018, SP Wind had total assets of $2.5 billion, total liabilities of $51 million, and noncontrolling interests of $47 million. 

Under the terms of the limited liability agreement, distributions without Class A member consent are limited to available cash and SP 

Wind is obligated to distribute all such available cash to its members each quarter. Available cash includes all cash generated in the quarter 

subject to the maintenance of appropriate operating reserves. Cash distributions from SP Wind are generally allocated 60% to Southern 

Power and 40% to the three financial investors in accordance with the limited liability agreement.

Transfers and sales of the assets in the VIE are subject to Class A member consent and the liabilities do not have recourse to the general 

credit of Southern Power. Liabilities consist of customary working capital items and do not include any long-term debt.

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
In April 2017, Southern Power reclassified approximately $114 million from redeemable noncontrolling interests to non-redeemable 

noncontrolling interests due to the expiration of an option allowing SunPower Corporation to require Southern Power to purchase its 

redeemable noncontrolling interest at fair market value. In addition, in October 2017, Turner Renewable Energy, LLC redeemed at fair value 

its 10% interest of redeemable noncontrolling interest in certain of Southern Power’s solar facilities. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, there 

were no outstanding redeemable noncontrolling interests.

The following table presents the changes in Southern Power’s redeemable noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2017 

and 2016:

2017

2016

(in millions)

Beginning balance
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests
Capital contributions from redeemable noncontrolling interests
Redemption of redeemable noncontrolling interests
Reclassification to non-redeemable noncontrolling interests
Change in fair value of redeemable noncontrolling interests
Ending balance

$ 164
2
(2)
2
(59)
(114)
7
$ —

The following table presents the attribution of net income to Southern Power and the noncontrolling interests for the years ended 

December 31, 2017 and 2016:

Net income
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Less: Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable to Southern Power

2017

(in millions)

$1,117
44
2
$1,071

$ 43
4
(1)
118
—
—
—
$164

2016

$374
32
4
$338

Southern Company Gas
SouthStar, previously a joint venture owned 85% by Southern Company Gas and 15% by Piedmont, was the only VIE for which Southern 

Company Gas was the primary beneficiary, prior to October 2016 when Southern Company Gas completed its purchase of Piedmont’s 

remaining interest in SouthStar.

In 2015, Georgia Natural Gas Company (GNG), a 100%-owned, direct subsidiary of Southern Company Gas, notified Piedmont of its 

election, pursuant to a change in control of SouthStar, to purchase Piedmont’s 15% interest in SouthStar at fair market value. This purchase 

was contingent upon the closing of the merger between Piedmont and Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy). In October 2016, after 

Piedmont and Duke Energy completed their merger, GNG completed its purchase of Piedmont’s interest in SouthStar and paid a purchase 
price of $160 million and $15 million for Piedmont’s share of SouthStar’s 2016 earnings through the date of acquisition.

145

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Southern Company Gas’ cash flows used for financing activities included SouthStar’s distribution to Piedmont for its portion of SouthStar’s 

annual earnings from the previous year. For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, SouthStar made a distribution 

of $15 million upon completion of the purchase of Piedmont’s interest in SouthStar. For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through 

June 30, 2016, SouthStar distributed $19 million to Piedmont.

Equity Method Investments
The carrying amounts of Southern Company Gas’ equity method investments at December 31, 2018 and 2017 and related income 

from those investments for the successor years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the successor period of July 1, 2016 through 

December 31, 2016, and the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 were as follows:

Investment Balance

SNG
PennEast Pipeline
Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Other
Total

Earnings from Equity  
Method Investments

SNG
PennEast Pipeline
Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Other
Total

SNG

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

(in millions)

$1,261
71
83
123
$1,538

$1,262
57
41
117
$1,477

Successor

Predecessor

Year ended  
December 31, 2018

Year ended  
December 31, 2017

July 1, 2016 through  
December 31, 2016

January 1, 2016 through  
June 30, 2016

(in millions)

(in millions)

$131
5
7
5
$148

$ 88
6
6
6
$106

$56
—
1
3
$60

$ —
—
—
2
$ 2

In 2016, Southern Company Gas, through a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary, acquired a 50% equity interest in SNG, which is accounted 

for as an equity method investment. See Note 15 under “Southern Company Gas – Investment in SNG” for additional information. Selected 

financial information of SNG at December 31, 2018 and 2017 and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and for the period 

September 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 is as follows:

Balance Sheet Information

Current assets
Property, plant, and equipment
Deferred charges and other assets

Total Assets

Current liabilities
Long-term debt
Other deferred charges and other liabilities

Total Liabilities

Total Stockholders’ Equity
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Income Statement Information

Revenues
Operating income
Net income

146

At December 31,

2018

2017

(in millions)

$ 104
2,606
121
$2,831

$ 103
1,103
212
$1,418

$1,413
$2,831

$

82
2,439
121
$2,642

$ 110
1,102
76
$1,288

$1,354
$2,642

Year ended
December 31, 2018

$604
310
261

Year ended
December 31, 2017

(in millions)

$544
242
175

September 1, 2016 
through December 31, 2016

$230
137
115

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Other Investments

Pipelines

In 2014, Southern Company Gas entered into a partnership in which it holds a 20% ownership interest in the PennEast Pipeline, an 

interstate pipeline company formed to develop and operate a 118-mile natural gas pipeline between New Jersey and Pennsylvania. 

The initial transportation capacity of 1.0 Bcf per day, is under long-term contracts, mainly with public utilities and other market-serving 

entities, such as electric generation companies, in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and New York.

Also in 2014, Southern Company Gas entered into a project in which it holds a 5% ownership interest in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, an 

interstate pipeline company formed to develop and operate a 594-mile natural gas pipeline in North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia 

with initial transportation capacity of 1.5 Bcf per day.

See Note 2 under “FERC Matters – Southern Company Gas” for additional information on these pipeline projects.

Pivotal JAX LNG, LLC

Southern Company Gas owns a 50% interest in a LNG liquefaction and storage facility in Jacksonville, Florida, which was placed in service 

in October 2018. This facility is outfitted with a 2.0 million gallon storage tank with the capacity to produce in excess of 120,000 gallons of 

LNG per day.

NOTE 8. FINANCING

Securities Due Within One Year
A summary of long-term securities due within one year at each of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas

December 31, 2018

Senior notes
Revenue bonds(a)
First mortgage bonds
Capitalized leases
Other(b)
Total

$ 2,950
173
50
24
1
$ 3,198

$200
—
—
1
—
$201

$500
108
—
13
(4)
$617

(in millions)

$ —
40
—
—
—
$40

$600
—
—
—
(1)
$599

$300
—
50
—
7
$357

(a)  For Southern Company and Mississippi Power, includes $40 million in pollution control revenue bonds classified as short term since they are variable rate 

demand obligations supported by short-term credit facilities; however, the final maturity dates range from 2020 to 2028.

(b)  Represents unamortized debt related amounts, acquisition accounting fair value adjustments, and/or fair value hedges. See Note 14 for additional 

information regarding fair value hedges.

Senior notes
Long-term bank term loans
Revenue bonds(a)
Capitalized leases
Other(b)
Total

Southern 
Company

Georgia 
Power

$ 2,354
1,420
90
31
(3)
$ 3,892

$750
100
—
11
(4)
$857

December 31, 2017

Mississippi 
Power

(in millions)

$ —
900
90
—
(1)
$989

Southern 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas

$350
420
—
—
—
$770

$155
—
—
—
2
$157

(a)  For Southern Company and Mississippi Power, includes $50 million in revenue bonds classified as short term at December 31, 2017 that were remarketed in 
an index rate mode subsequent to December 31, 2017. Also for Southern Company and Mississippi Power, includes $40 million in pollution control revenue 
bonds classified as short term since they are variable rate demand obligations supported by short-term credit facilities; however, the final maturity dates 
range from 2020 to 2028.

(b)  Represents unamortized debt related amounts, acquisition accounting fair value adjustments, and fair value hedges. See Note 14 for additional information 

regarding fair value hedges.

147

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Maturities of long-term debt for the next five years are as follows:

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023

Southern 
Company(a)

Alabama 
Power

Georgia

Power(a)

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power(b)

Southern 
Company Gas

(in millions)

$ 3,156
4,041
3,186
1,974
2,388

$200
250
310
750
300

$ 621
1,006
375
505
153

$ —
307
270
—
—

$600
825
300
677
290

$350
—
330
46
400

(a)  Amounts include principal amortization related to the FFB borrowings beginning in 2020; however, the final maturity date is February 20, 2044. See 

“Long-term Debt – DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings” herein for additional information.

(b)  Southern Power’s 2022 maturity represents euro-denominated debt at the U.S. dollar denominated hedge settlement amount.

Long-term Debt

Senior Notes
Total senior notes (including amounts due within one year) outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

Southern 
Company(a)

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas(b)

(in millions)

December 31, 2018
December 31, 2017

$32,725
35,148

$6,875
6,375

$5,600
7,100

$1,200
755

$5,050
5,459

$4,000
4,157

(a)  Includes $10.0 billion and $10.2 billion of senior notes at the Southern Company parent entity at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(b)  Represents senior notes issued by Southern Company Gas Capital, which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Southern Company Gas. See 

“Structural Considerations” herein for additional information.

See Note 14 for information regarding fair value hedges of existing senior notes.

Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of 2018 senior note issuances for 

long-term debt redemptions and maturities, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working 

capital. The subsidiaries also used the proceeds for their construction programs.

In August 2018, Southern Company issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due 

February 14, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR.

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, through cash tender offers, Southern Company repurchased and retired approximately $522 million 

of the $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 1.85% Senior Notes due July 1, 2019 (1.85% Notes), approximately 

$180 million of the $350 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2014B 2.15% Senior Notes due September 1, 2019 

(Series 2014B Notes), and approximately $504 million of the $750 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2018A 

Floating Rate Notes due February 14, 2020 (Series 2018A Notes), for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, 

of approximately $1.2 billion. In addition, subsequent to December 31, 2018, and following the completion of the cash tender offers, 

Southern Company completed the redemption of all of the Series 2018A Notes remaining outstanding and called for redemption all of the 

1.85% Notes and Series 2014B Notes remaining outstanding.

In June 2018, Alabama Power issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A 4.30% Senior Notes due July 15, 2048.

In April 2018, Georgia Power redeemed all $250 million aggregate principal amount of its Series 2008B 5.40% Senior Notes due 

June 1, 2018.

In May 2018, through cash tender offers, Georgia Power repurchased and retired $89 million of the $250 million aggregate principal 

amount outstanding of its Series 2007A 5.65% Senior Notes due March 1, 2037, $326 million of the $500 million aggregate principal 

amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.95% Senior Notes due February 1, 2039, and $335 million of the $600 million aggregate principal 

amount outstanding of its Series 2010B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2040, for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and 

unpaid interest, of $902 million.

In March 2018, Mississippi Power issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due 

March 27, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR and $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018B 3.95% Senior 
Notes due March 30, 2028.

148

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

In October 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all $30 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series G 

5.40% Senior Notes due July 1, 2035 and all $125 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.55% Senior Notes 

due March 1, 2019.

Junior Subordinated Notes
Total junior subordinated notes outstanding for Southern Company and Georgia Power at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

December 31, 2018
December 31, 2017

Southern 
(*)
Company

(in millions)

$3,570
3,570

Georgia
Power

$ 270
270

(*)  Includes $3.3 billion of junior subordinated notes at the Southern Company parent entity at both December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
Pollution control revenue bond obligations represent loans to the traditional electric operating companies from public authorities of funds 

derived from sales by such authorities of revenue bonds issued to finance pollution control and solid waste disposal facilities. In some 

cases, the pollution control revenue bond obligations represent obligations under installment sales agreements with respect to facilities 

constructed with the proceeds of revenue bonds issued by public authorities. The traditional electric operating companies are required to 

make payments sufficient for the authorities to meet principal and interest requirements of such bonds. Proceeds from certain issuances 

are restricted until qualifying expenditures are incurred. Total tax-exempt pollution control revenue bond obligations (including amounts 

due within one year) outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

December 31, 2018
December 31, 2017

Southern
Company

$2,585
3,297

Alabama
Power

$1,060
1,060

(in millions)

Georgia 
Power

$1,460
1,821

Mississippi 
Power

$40
83

In October 2018, Alabama Power purchased and held $120 million aggregate principal amount of The Industrial Development Board of 

the City of Mobile, Alabama Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Alabama Power Company Plant Barry Project), Series 2008. Alabama Power 

reoffered these bonds to the public in November 2018.

During 2018, Georgia Power purchased and held the following pollution control revenue bonds, which may be reoffered to the public at a 

later date:

 O approximately $105 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue 

Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 2013

 O $173 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Bartow County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds 

(Georgia Power Company Plant Bowen Project), First Series 2009

 O $55 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia 

Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), Fifth Series 1994

 O $65 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia 

Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), Second Series 2008

 O approximately $72 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Bartow County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue 

Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Bowen Project), First Series 2013

In December 2018, the Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) issued approximately $108 million aggregate principal amount 

of Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 2018 due November 1, 2052 for the benefit 

of Georgia Power. The proceeds were used to redeem, in January 2019, approximately $13 million, $20 million, and $75 million aggregate 

principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant 

Vogtle Project), First Series 1992, Eighth Series 1994, and Second Series 1995, respectively.

In July 2018, Mississippi Power purchased and held approximately $43 million aggregate principal amount of Mississippi Business Finance 

Corporation Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002. Mississippi Power may reoffer these bonds to the public at a 

later date.

149

Southern Company 2018 Annual Report 
Notes to Financial Statements

Bank Term Loans
Total long-term bank term loans (including amounts due within one year) outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

December 31, 2018
December 31, 2017

Southern
Company

$ 145
1,465

Alabama 
Power

$ 45
45

Georgia 
Power

(in millions)

$ —
100

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

$ —
900

$ —
420

See “Notes Payable” herein for additional information regarding bank term loans.

In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $100 million floating rate bank loan due October 26, 2018.

In March 2018, Mississippi Power repaid at maturity a $900 million unsecured term loan. 

In May 2018, Southern Power repaid $420 million aggregate principal amount of long-term floating rate bank loans. 

In November 2018, SEGCO, as borrower, and Alabama Power, as guarantor, entered into a $100 million long-term delayed draw floating 

rate bank term loan bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, which SEGCO used to repay at maturity $100 million aggregate principal 

amount of Series 2013A Senior Notes. See Note 9 under “Guarantees” for additional information.

DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings
Pursuant to the loan guarantee program established under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program), 

Georgia Power and the DOE entered into the Loan Guarantee Agreement in 2014, under which the DOE agreed to guarantee the 

obligations of Georgia Power under a note purchase agreement (FFB Note Purchase Agreement) among the DOE, Georgia Power, and the 

FFB and a related promissory note (FFB Promissory Note). The FFB Note Purchase Agreement and the FFB Promissory Note provide for a 

multi-advance term loan facility (FFB Credit Facility), under which Georgia Power may make term loan borrowings through the FFB.

In July 2017, Georgia Power entered into an amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement (LGA Amendment) in connection with the 

DOE’s consent to Georgia Power’s entry into the Vogtle Services Agreement and the related intellectual property licenses (IP Licenses).

Under the terms of the Loan Guarantee Agreement, upon termination of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, further advances are conditioned upon 

the DOE’s approval of any agreements entered into in replacement of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement. Under the terms of the LGA Amendment, 

Georgia Power will not request any advances unless and until certain conditions are satisfied, including (i) receipt of the DOE’s approval of the 

Bechtel Agreement (together with the Vogtle Services Agreement and the IP Licenses, the Replacement EPC Arrangements) and (ii) Georgia 

Power’s entry into a further amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the DOE to reflect the Replacement EPC Arrangements.

Proceeds of advances made under the FFB Credit Facility are used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs. Aggregate 

borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility may not exceed the lesser of (i) 70% of Eligible Project Costs or (ii) approximately $3.46 billion.

In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion of additional guaranteed 

loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expires on March 31, 2019, subject to any further extension approved 
by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of 

definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions.

All borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility are full recourse to Georgia Power, and Georgia Power is obligated to reimburse the DOE for 

any payments the DOE is required to make to the FFB under the guarantee. Georgia Power’s reimbursement obligations to the DOE are 

full recourse and secured by a first priority lien on (i) Georgia Power’s 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 

(primarily the units under construction, the related real property, and any nuclear fuel loaded in the reactor core) and (ii) Georgia Power’s 

rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. There are no restrictions on Georgia Power’s 

ability to grant liens on other property.

In addition to the conditions described above, future advances are subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, as well as certification 

of compliance with the requirements of the Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program, including accuracy of project-related representations and 

warranties, delivery of updated project-related information, and evidence of compliance with the prevailing wage requirements of the 

Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, as amended, and certification from the DOE’s consulting engineer that proceeds of the advances are used to 

reimburse Eligible Project Costs.

150

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Upon satisfaction of all conditions described above, advances may be requested under the FFB Credit Facility on a quarterly basis 

through 2020. The final maturity date for each advance under the FFB Credit Facility is February 20, 2044. Interest is payable quarterly 

and principal payments will begin on February 20, 2020. Borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility will bear interest at the applicable 

U.S. Treasury rate plus a spread equal to 0.375%.

At both December 31, 2018 and 2017, Georgia Power had $2.6 billion of borrowings outstanding under the FFB Credit Facility.

Under the Loan Guarantee Agreement, Georgia Power is subject to customary borrower affirmative and negative covenants and events of 

default. In addition, Georgia Power is subject to project-related reporting requirements and other project-specific covenants and events 

of default.

In the event certain mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4) 

occur, the FFB’s commitment to make further advances under the FFB Credit Facility will terminate and Georgia Power will be required to 

prepay the outstanding principal amount of all borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility over a period of five years (with level principal 

amortization). Among other things, these mandatory prepayment events include (i) the termination of the Vogtle Services Agreement or 

rejection of the Vogtle Services Agreement in bankruptcy if Georgia Power does not maintain access to intellectual property rights under 

the IP Licenses; (ii) a decision by Georgia Power not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4; (iii) cancellation of Plant Vogtle 

Units 3 and 4 by the Georgia PSC, or by Georgia Power if authorized by the Georgia PSC; and (iv) cost disallowances by the Georgia PSC 

that could have a material adverse effect on completion of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or Georgia Power’s ability to repay the outstanding 

borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. Under certain circumstances, insurance proceeds and any proceeds from an event of taking 

must be applied to immediately prepay outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. In addition, if Georgia Power discontinues 

construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, Georgia Power would be obligated to immediately repay a portion of the outstanding 

borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility to the extent such outstanding borrowings exceed 70% of Eligible Project Costs, net of the 

proceeds received by Georgia Power under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement. Georgia Power also may voluntarily prepay outstanding 

borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. Under the FFB Credit Facility, any prepayment (whether mandatory or optional) will be made with 

a make-whole premium or discount, as applicable.

In connection with any cancellation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 that results in a mandatory prepayment event, the DOE may elect 

to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In such an event, the DOE will have the right to assume Georgia Power’s rights 

and obligations under the principal agreements relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and to acquire all or a portion of Georgia Power’s 

ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.

Other Long-Term Debt

Alabama Power

Alabama Power has formed a wholly-owned trust subsidiary for the purpose of issuing preferred securities. The proceeds of the related 

equity investments and preferred security sales were loaned back to Alabama Power through the issuance of junior subordinated notes 

totaling $206 million outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017, which constitute substantially all of the assets of this trust and are 

reflected in the balance sheets as long-term debt payable. Alabama Power considers that the mechanisms and obligations relating to 

the preferred securities issued for its benefit, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by it of the trust’s payment 

obligations with respect to these securities. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, trust preferred securities of $200 million were outstanding. 

See Note 1 under “Variable Interest Entities” for additional information on the accounting treatment for this trust and the related securities.

Mississippi Power

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Mississippi Power had $270 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of Mississippi Business 

Finance Corporation Taxable Revenue Bonds, 7.13% Series 1999A due October 20, 2021. Mississippi Power assumed the obligations 

in 2011 in connection with its election under its operating lease of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 to purchase the assets. The bonds were 

recorded at fair value at the date of assumption, or $346 million, reflecting a premium of $76 million. See “Secured Debt” herein for 

additional information.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Mississippi Power had $50 million of tax-exempt revenue bond obligations outstanding representing 

loans to Mississippi Power from a public authority of funds derived from the sale by such authority of revenue bonds issued to finance a 

portion of the costs of constructing the Kemper County energy facility.

Southern Company Gas

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Nicor Gas had $1.3 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, of first mortgage bonds outstanding. These bonds 

have been issued with maturities ranging from 2019 to 2058. See “Secured Debt” herein for additional information.

151

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Prior to its sale, in the second quarter 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings caused $200 million aggregate principal amount of gas facility revenue 

bonds to be redeemed.

Nicor Gas issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of first mortgage bonds in a private placement, of which $100 million was issued 

in August 2018 and $200 million was issued in November 2018.

At both December 31, 2018 and 2017, Atlanta Gas Light had $159 million of medium-term notes outstanding.

Capital Leases
Assets acquired under capital leases are recorded in the balance sheets as property, plant, and equipment and the related obligations are 

classified as long-term debt. See Note 5 under “Capital Leases” for additional information.

Southern Company

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, SCS had capital lease obligations of approximately $178 million and $177 million, respectively, for an 

office building and certain computer equipment including desktops, laptops, servers, printers, and storage devices with annual interest rates 

that range from 1.6% to 4.7%.

Georgia Power

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Georgia Power had a capital lease obligation for its corporate headquarters building of $15 million and 

$22 million, respectively, with an annual interest rate of 7.9%. For ratemaking purposes, the Georgia PSC has allowed the lease payments 

in cost of service with no return on the capital lease asset. The difference between the depreciation and the lease payments allowed for 

ratemaking purposes is recovered as operating expenses as ordered by the Georgia PSC. The annual operating expense incurred for this 

capital lease was not material for any year presented.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Georgia Power had capital lease obligations related to two affiliate PPAs with Southern Power of 

$128 million and $132 million, respectively. The annual interest rates range from 11% to 12% for these two capital lease PPAs. For ratemaking 

purposes, the Georgia PSC has included the capital lease asset amortization in cost of service and the interest in Georgia Power’s cost of debt. 

See Note 1 under “Affiliate Transactions” and Note 9 under “Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements – Affiliate” for additional information.

Secured Debt
Each of Southern Company’s subsidiaries is organized as a legal entity, separate and apart from Southern Company and its other 

subsidiaries. There are no agreements or other arrangements among the Southern Company system companies under which the assets of 

one company have been pledged or otherwise made available to satisfy obligations of Southern Company or any of its other subsidiaries.

Outstanding secured debt at December 31, 2018 and 2017 for the applicable registrants was as follows:

December 31, 2018
December 31, 2017

Georgia 
Power(a)

$2,767
2,779

Mississippi

Power(b)

(in millions)
$270
270

Southern

Company Gas(c)

$1,325
1,025

(a)  Includes Georgia Power’s FFB loans that are secured by a first priority lien on (i) Georgia Power’s 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 
and 4 (primarily the units under construction, the related real property, and any nuclear fuel loaded in the reactor core) and (ii) Georgia Power’s rights and 
obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. These borrowings totaled $2.6 billion at both December 31, 2018 and 2017. 
See “Long-term Debt – DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings” herein for additional information. Also includes capital lease obligations of $142 million and 
$154 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See “Long-term Debt – Capital Leases – Georgia Power” herein for additional information.
(b)  The revenue bonds assumed in conjunction with Mississippi Power’s purchase of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 are secured by Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 and 

certain related personal property. See “Long-term Debt – Other Long-Term Debt” herein for additional information.

(c)  Nicor Gas’ first mortgage bonds are secured by substantially all of Nicor Gas’ properties. See “Long-term Debt – Other Long-Term Debt – Southern 

Company Gas” herein for additional information.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Gulf Power had $41 million of secured debt related to a lien on its property at Plant Daniel in connection 

with the issuance of two series of its pollution control revenue bonds, which are included in liabilities held for sale on Southern Company’s 

balance sheet at December 31, 2018. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. See 

Note 15 under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” for additional information.

Each registrant’s senior notes, junior subordinated notes, pollution control and other revenue bond obligations, bank term loans, credit 

facility borrowings, and notes payable are effectively subordinated to all secured debt of each respective registrant.

152

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Bank Credit Arrangements
At December 31, 2018, committed credit arrangements with banks were as follows:

Company

2019

2020

2022

Total

Unused(d)

(in millions)

Expires

Executable  
Term Loans

Expires Within
One Year

One
Year

Two
Years

Term 
Out

No Term 
Out

Southern Company(a)
Alabama Power
Georgia Power
Mississippi Power
Southern Power(b)
Southern Company Gas(c)
Other
Southern Company Consolidated(e)

$ —
33
—
100
—
—
30
$163

$ —
500
—
—
—
—
—
$500

$2,000
800
1,750
—
750
1,900
—
$7,200

$2,000
1,333
1,750
100
750
1,900
30
$7,863

$1,999
1,333
1,736
100
727
1,895
30
$7,820

$—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$—

$—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$—

$—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$—

$ —
33
—
100
—
—
30
$163

(a)  Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(b)  Southern Power’s subsidiaries are not parties to its bank credit arrangement.
(c)  Southern Company Gas provides a parent guarantee of the obligations of its subsidiary Southern Company Gas Capital, which is the borrower of 

$1.4 billion ($1.395 billion unused) of this arrangement. Southern Company Gas’ committed credit arrangement also includes $500 million (all unused) 
for which Nicor Gas is the borrower and which is restricted for working capital needs of Nicor Gas. Pursuant to this multi-year credit arrangement, the 
allocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas may be adjusted. See “Structural Considerations” herein for additional information.

(d)  Amounts used are for letters of credit.
(e)  Excludes $280 million of committed credit arrangements of Gulf Power, which was sold on January 1, 2019. See Note 15 under “Southern Company’s Sale 

of Gulf Power” for additional information.

Most of the bank credit arrangements require payment of commitment fees based on the unused portion of the commitments or the 
maintenance of compensating balances with the banks. Commitment fees average less than 1/4 of 1% for Southern Company, the 
traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. Compensating balances are not legally 
restricted from withdrawal.

Subject to applicable market conditions, Southern Company and its subsidiaries expect to renew or replace their bank credit arrangements 
as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Southern Company and its subsidiaries may extend the maturity dates and/or 
increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.

Southern Company’s, Southern Company Gas’, and Nicor Gas’ credit arrangements contain covenants that limit debt levels to 70% of total 
capitalization, as defined in the agreements, and most of the other subsidiaries’ bank credit arrangements contain covenants that limit 
debt levels to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreements. For purposes of these definitions, debt excludes the long-term 
debt payable to affiliated trusts and, in certain arrangements, other hybrid securities. Additionally, for Southern Company and Southern 
Power, for purposes of these definitions, debt would exclude any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of Southern Power to the 
extent such debt is non-recourse to Southern Power and capitalization would exclude the capital stock or other equity attributable to such 
subsidiaries. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company 
Gas, and Nicor Gas were each in compliance with their respective debt limit covenants.

A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the revenue bonds of the traditional electric 
operating companies and the commercial paper programs of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern 
Power, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. The amount of variable rate revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies 
outstanding requiring liquidity support at December 31, 2018 was approximately $1.6 billion (comprised of approximately $854 million 
at Alabama Power, $659 million at Georgia Power, $82 million at Gulf Power, and $40 million at Mississippi Power). In addition, 
at December 31, 2018, the traditional electric operating companies had approximately $403 million (comprised of approximately 
$345 million at Georgia Power and $58 million at Gulf Power) of revenue bonds outstanding that are required to be remarketed within 
the next 12 months. See Note 15 under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on 
January 1, 2019. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $108 million of obligations related to 
outstanding variable rate pollution control revenue bonds.

In addition to its credit arrangement described above, Southern Power also has a $120 million continuing letter of credit facility expiring 
in 2021 for standby letters of credit. At December 31, 2018, $103 million has been used for letters of credit, primarily as credit support 
for PPA requirements, and $17 million was unused. At December 31, 2017, the total amount available under this facility was $19 million. 
Southern Power’s subsidiaries are not parties to this letter of credit facility. Also, at December 31, 2018 and 2017, Southern Power had 
$103 million and $113 million, respectively, of cash collateral posted related to PPA requirements, which is included in other deferred 

charges and assets in Southern Power’s consolidated balance sheets.

153

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Notes Payable
Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, Nicor Gas, and SEGCO make short-term 

borrowings primarily through commercial paper programs that have the liquidity support of the committed bank credit arrangements 

described above under “Bank Credit Arrangements.” Southern Power’s subsidiaries are not parties to its commercial paper program. 

Southern Company Gas maintains commercial paper programs at Southern Company Gas Capital and at Nicor Gas. Nicor Gas’ commercial 

paper program supports working capital needs at Nicor Gas as Nicor Gas is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. All 

of Southern Company Gas’ other subsidiaries benefit from Southern Company Gas Capital’s commercial paper program. See “Structural 

Considerations” herein for additional information.

In addition, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries have entered into various bank term loan agreements. Unless otherwise 

stated, the proceeds of these loans were used to repay existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including working capital 

and, for the subsidiaries, their continuous construction programs.

Commercial paper and short-term bank term loans are included in notes payable in the balance sheets. Details of short-term borrowings 

Notes Payable at December 31, 2018

Notes Payable at December 31, 2017

Amount
Outstanding

(in millions)

Weighted Average
Interest Rate

were as follows:

Southern Company
Commercial paper
Short-term bank debt
Total

Alabama Power

Short-term bank debt

Georgia Power

Commercial paper
Short-term bank debt
Total

Mississippi Power

Short-term bank debt

Southern Power

Commercial paper
Short-term bank debt
Total

Southern Company Gas

Commercial paper:

Southern Company Gas Capital
Nicor Gas

Total

$1,064
1,851
$2,915

$ —

$ 294
—
$ 294

$ —

$ —
100
$ 100

$ 403
247
$ 650

Amount
Outstanding

(in millions)

$1,832
607
$2,439

3.0%
3.1%
3.1%

—%

$

3

3.1%
—%
3.1%

$ —
150
$ 150

—%

$

4

—%
3.1%
3.1%

3.1%
3.0%
3.0%

$ 105
—
$ 105

$1,243
275
$1,518

Weighted Average
Interest Rate

1.8%
2.3%
1.9%

3.7%

—%
2.2%
2.2%

3.8%

2.0%
—%
2.0%

1.7%
1.8%
1.8%

The outstanding bank term loans at December 31, 2018 have covenants that limit debt levels to a percentage of total capitalization. The 

percentage is 70% for Southern Company and 65% for Alabama Power and Southern Power, as defined in the agreements. For purposes of 

these definitions, debt excludes any long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts and other hybrid securities. Additionally, for Southern Company 

and Southern Power, for purposes of these definitions, debt excludes any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of Southern Power to the 

extent such debt is non-recourse to Southern Power and capitalization excludes the capital stock or other equity attributable to such subsidiary. 

At December 31, 2018, each of Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Southern Power was in compliance with its debt limits.

Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of bank loans for long-term debt 

redemptions and maturities, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital.

In March 2018, Southern Company entered into a $900 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month 
LIBOR, which was repaid in August 2018.

154

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

In April 2018, Southern Company borrowed $250 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, bearing interest 
at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days’ demand by the bank. 
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.

In June 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity two $100 million short-term floating rate bank term loans.

In August 2018, Southern Company entered into a $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month 
LIBOR, and repaid $250 million borrowed in August 2017 pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement. Subsequent to 
December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.

In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $150 million floating rate bank loan due May 31, 2018.

In March 2018, Mississippi Power entered into a $300 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month 
LIBOR, of which $200 million was repaid in the second quarter 2018 and $100 million was repaid in the third quarter 2018.

In May 2018, Southern Power entered into two short-term floating rate bank loans, each for an aggregate principal amount of 
$100 million, which bear interest based on one-month LIBOR. In November 2018, Southern Power repaid one of these short-term loans.

In January 2018, Southern Company Gas issued a floating rate promissory note to Southern Company in an aggregate principal amount of 
$100 million bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. In March 2018, Southern Company Gas repaid this promissory note.

In April 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings, as borrower, and Southern Company Gas, as guarantor, entered into a $181 million short-term 
delayed draw floating rate bank term loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. In July 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings repaid this 
short-term loan.

In May 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital borrowed $95 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, 
guaranteed by Southern Company Gas, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company Gas Capital and the bank from time 
to time and payable on no less than 30 days’ demand by the bank. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital repaid this loan.

Outstanding Classes of Capital Stock

Southern Company

Common Stock

Stock Issued
During 2018, Southern Company issued approximately 11.6 million shares of common stock primarily through employee equity 
compensation plans and received proceeds of approximately $442 million.

In addition, during the third and fourth quarters 2018, Southern Company issued a total of approximately 12.1 million and 2.5 million 
shares, respectively, of common stock through at-the-market issuances pursuant to sales agency agreements related to Southern 
Company’s continuous equity offering program and received cash proceeds of approximately $540 million and $108 million, respectively, 
net of $5 million and $1 million in commissions, respectively.

Shares Reserved
At December 31, 2018, a total of 92 million shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to the Southern Investment Plan, employee savings 
plans, the Outside Directors Stock Plan, the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (which includes stock options and performance share 
units as discussed in Note 12), and an at-the-market program. Of the total 92 million shares reserved, there were 10 million shares of 
common stock remaining available for awards under the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan at December 31, 2018.

Diluted Earnings Per Share
For Southern Company, the only difference in computing basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) is attributable to awards outstanding 
under the stock option and performance share plans. The effect of both stock options and performance share award units was determined 
using the treasury stock method. Shares used to compute diluted EPS were as follows:

As reported shares
Effect of options and performance share award units
Diluted shares

Average Common Stock Shares
2017
(in millions)
1,000
8
1,008

2018

1,020
5
1,025

2016

951
7
958

Stock options and performance share award units that were not included in the diluted EPS calculation because they were anti-dilutive 

were immaterial in all years presented.

155

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries

Prior to 2017, each of the traditional electric operating companies had outstanding preferred and/or preference stock. During 2017, 

Alabama Power and Gulf Power redeemed all of their outstanding preference stock and Georgia Power redeemed all of its outstanding 

preferred and preference stock. During 2018, Mississippi Power redeemed all of its outstanding preferred stock. The remaining preferred 

stock of Alabama Power contains a feature that allows the holders to elect a majority of such subsidiary’s board of directors if preferred 

dividends are not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event is not solely within the control 

of Alabama Power, this preferred stock is presented as “Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries” on Southern Company’s balance sheets 

and statements of capitalization in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable accounting standards.

The following table presents changes during the year in redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries for Southern Company:

Balance at December 31, 2015 and 2016:

Issued(a)
Redeemed(a)
Issuance costs(a)

Balance at December 31, 2017:

Redeemed(b)

Balance at December 31, 2018:

(a)  See “Alabama Power” herein for additional information.
(b)  See “Mississippi Power” herein for additional information.

Redeemable Preferred 
Stock of Subsidiaries

(in millions)

$118
250
(38)
(6)
324
(33)
$291

Alabama Power
Alabama Power has preferred stock, Class A preferred stock, and common stock outstanding. Alabama Power also has authorized preference 

stock, none of which is outstanding. Alabama Power’s preferred stock and Class A preferred stock, without preference between classes, rank 

senior to Alabama Power’s common stock with respect to payment of dividends and voluntary and involuntary dissolution. The preferred 

stock and Class A preferred stock of Alabama Power contain a feature that allows the holders to elect a majority of Alabama Power’s 

board of directors if preferred dividends are not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event 

is not solely within the control of Alabama Power, the preferred stock and Class A preferred stock is presented as “Redeemable Preferred 

Stock” on Alabama Power’s balance sheets and statements of capitalization in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable 

accounting standards.

Alabama Power’s preferred stock is subject to redemption at a price equal to the par value plus a premium. Alabama Power’s Class A 

preferred stock is subject to redemption at a price equal to the stated capital. All series of Alabama Power’s preferred stock currently are 

subject to redemption at the option of Alabama Power. The Class A preferred stock is subject to redemption on or after October 1, 2022, or 

following the occurrence of a rating agency event. Information for each outstanding series is in the table below:

Preferred Stock
4.92% Preferred Stock
4.72% Preferred Stock
4.64% Preferred Stock
4.60% Preferred Stock
4.52% Preferred Stock
4.20% Preferred Stock
5.00% Class A Preferred Stock

Par Value/Stated 
Capital Per Share

$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$ 25

Shares 
Outstanding

80,000
50,000
60,000
100,000
50,000
135,115
10,000,000

Redemption
Price Per Share

$103.23
$102.18
$103.14
$104.20
$102.93
$105.00

Stated Capital(*)

(*)  Prior to October 1, 2022: $25.50; on or after October 1, 2022: Stated Capital

In September 2017, Alabama Power issued 10 million shares ($250 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.00% Class A Preferred Stock, 

Cumulative, Par Value $1 Per Share (Stated Capital $25 Per Share). The proceeds were used in October 2017 to redeem all 2 million shares 

($50 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.50% Series Preference Stock, 6 million shares ($150 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.45% 

Series Preference Stock, and 1.52 million shares ($38 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.83% Class A Preferred Stock and for other 

general corporate purposes, including Alabama Power’s continuous construction program.

There were no changes for the year ended December 31, 2018 in redeemable preferred stock of Alabama Power.

156

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Georgia Power
Georgia Power has preferred stock, Class A preferred stock, preference stock, and common stock authorized, but only common stock 

outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. In October 2017, Georgia Power redeemed all 1.8 million shares ($45 million aggregate 

liquidation amount) of its 6.125% Series Class A Preferred Stock and 2.25 million shares ($225 million aggregate liquidation amount) of its 

6.50% Series 2007A Preference Stock.

Mississippi Power
Mississippi Power has preferred stock and common stock authorized, but only common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2018. 

Mississippi Power previously had preferred stock that contained a feature allowing the holders to elect a majority of Mississippi Power’s 

board of directors if preferred dividends were not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event 

was not solely within the control of Mississippi Power, this preferred stock was presented as “Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock” 

on Mississippi Power’s balance sheets and statements of capitalization in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable 

accounting standards.

On October 23, 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all 8,867 outstanding shares ($886,700 aggregate par value) of 

its 4.40% Series Preferred Stock, all 8,643 outstanding shares ($864,300 aggregate par value) of its 4.60% Series Preferred Stock, all 

16,700 outstanding shares ($1.67 million aggregate par value) of its 4.72% Series Preferred Stock, and all 1,200,000 outstanding depositary 

shares ($30 million aggregate stated value), each representing a 1/4th interest in a share of its 5.25% Series Preferred Stock.

Dividend Restrictions
The income of Southern Company is derived primarily from equity in earnings of its subsidiaries. At December 31, 2018, consolidated 

retained earnings included $4.9 billion of undistributed retained earnings of the subsidiaries.

The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power can only pay dividends to Southern Company out of retained earnings or 

paid-in-capital.

See Note 7 under “Southern Power” for information regarding the distribution requirements for certain Southern Power subsidiaries.

The authority of the natural gas distribution utilities to pay dividends to Southern Company Gas is subject to regulation. By regulation, 

Nicor Gas is restricted, to the extent of its retained earnings balance, in the amount it can dividend or loan to affiliates and is not permitted 

to make money pool loans to affiliates. At December 31, 2018, the amount of Southern Company Gas’ subsidiary retained earnings 

restricted for dividend payment totaled $814 million.

Structural Considerations
Since Southern Company and Southern Company Gas are holding companies, the right of Southern Company and Southern Company Gas 

and, hence, the right of creditors of Southern Company or Southern Company Gas to participate in any distribution of the assets of any 

respective subsidiary of Southern Company or Southern Company Gas, whether upon liquidation, reorganization or otherwise, is subject to 

prior claims of creditors and preferred stockholders of such subsidiary.

Southern Company Gas’ 100%-owned subsidiary, Southern Company Gas Capital, was established to provide for certain of Southern 

Company Gas’ ongoing financing needs through a commercial paper program, the issuance of various debt, hybrid securities, and other 

financing arrangements. Southern Company Gas fully and unconditionally guarantees all debt issued by Southern Company Gas Capital. 

Nicor Gas is not permitted by regulation to make loans to affiliates or utilize Southern Company Gas Capital for its financing needs.

Southern Power Company’s senior notes, bank term loans, commercial paper, and bank credit arrangement are unsecured senior 

indebtedness, which rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated debt of Southern Power Company. Southern Power’s 

subsidiaries are not issuers, borrowers, or obligors, as applicable, under the senior notes, borrowings from financial institutions, commercial 

paper, or the bank credit arrangement. The senior notes, borrowings from financial institutions, commercial paper, and the bank credit 

arrangement are effectively subordinated to any future secured debt of Southern Power Company and any potential claims of creditors of 

Southern Power’s subsidiaries.

157

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS

Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements

Non-Affiliate
To supply a portion of the fuel requirements of the Southern Company system’s electric generating plants, the Southern Company system 

has entered into various long-term commitments not recognized on the balance sheets for the procurement and delivery of fossil fuel and, 

for Alabama Power and Georgia Power, nuclear fuel. Fuel expense in 2018, 2017, and 2016 for the Southern Company system is shown 

below, the majority of which was purchased under long-term commitments.

2018
2017
2016

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

$4,637
4,400
4,361

$1,301
1,225
1,297

Georgia 
Power

(in millions)
$1,698
1,671
1,807

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

$405
395
343

$699
621
456

Each registrant expects that a substantial amount of its future fuel needs will continue to be purchased under long-term commitments.

The traditional electric operating companies have entered into various non-affiliate long-term PPAs, some of which are accounted for 

as leases. For Alabama Power and Georgia Power, most long-term PPAs include capacity and energy components. Mississippi Power’s 

long-term PPAs are associated with solar facilities and only include an energy component. For the traditional electric operating companies, 

the energy-related costs associated with PPAs are recoverable through fuel cost recovery provisions.

Total capacity expense under these non-affiliate PPAs accounted for as operating leases in 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:

2018
2017
2016

Southern 
Company

$231
235
232

Alabama 
Power

(in millions)
$44
41
42

Georgia 
Power

$113
118
113

In addition, Georgia Power’s non-affiliate energy-only solar PPAs accounted for as leases contained contingent rent expense of $43 million, 

$44 million, and $18 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Mississippi Power’s energy-only solar PPAs accounted for as operating 

leases contained contingent rent expense of $10 million, $5 million, and an immaterial amount for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. 

Contingent rents are recognized as services are performed.

Estimated total obligations under non-affiliate PPAs accounted for as operating leases at December 31, 2018 were as follows:

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024 and thereafter
Total

Southern 
Company

$ 161
164
168
171
127
642
$1,433

Alabama 
Power

(in millions)

$ 41
42
44
46
—
—
$173

Georgia 
Power

$ 120
122
124
125
127
642
$1,260

In addition, Georgia Power has commitments regarding a portion of a 5% interest in the original cost of Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 owned 

by MEAG Power that are in effect until the latter of the retirement of the plant or the latest stated maturity date of MEAG Power’s bonds 

issued to finance such ownership interest. The payments for capacity are required whether or not any capacity is available. The energy 

cost is a function of each unit’s variable operating costs. Portions of the capacity payments relate to costs in excess of MEAG Power’s Plant 

Vogtle Units 1 and 2 allowed investment for ratemaking purposes. The present value of these portions at the time of the disallowance 

was written off. Generally, the cost of such capacity and energy is included in purchased power in Southern Company’s statements of 

income and in purchased power, non-affiliates in Georgia Power’s statements of income. Georgia Power’s capacity payments related to this 

commitment totaled $8 million, $9 million, and $11 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power’s 

estimated long-term obligations related to this commitment totaled $59 million, consisting of $6 million for 2019, $5 million for 2020, 
$5 million for 2021, $4 million for 2022, $3 million for 2023, and $36 million for 2024 and thereafter.

158

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

SCS may enter into various types of wholesale energy and natural gas contracts acting as an agent for the traditional electric operating 

companies and Southern Power. Under these agreements, each of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may 

be jointly and severally liable. Accordingly, Southern Company has entered into keep-well agreements with each of the traditional electric 

operating companies to ensure they will not subsidize or be responsible for any costs, losses, liabilities, or damages resulting from the 

inclusion of Southern Power as a contracting party under these agreements.

Affiliate
Georgia Power has also entered into affiliate long-term PPAs with Southern Power, some of which Georgia Power accounts for as leases. 

Georgia Power’s total capacity expense under these affiliate PPAs accounted for as leases was $93 million, $107 million, and $133 million 

in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. In addition, Georgia Power’s energy-only solar PPAs with Southern Power accounted for as leases 

contained contingent rent expense of $29 million, $29 million, and $21 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

Georgia Power’s estimated total obligations under affiliate PPAs accounted for as leases at December 31, 2018 were as follows:

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024 and thereafter
Total
Less: amounts representing executory costs(a)
Net minimum lease payments
Less: amounts representing interest(b)
Present value of net minimum lease payments

Georgia Power

Affiliate Capital  
Lease PPAs

Affiliate Operating
Lease PPAs

(in millions)

$ 64
65
66
68
69
349
$681

$ 23
23
24
24
25
158
$277
42
235
105
$130

(a)  Executory costs such as taxes, maintenance, and insurance (including the estimated profit thereon) are estimated and included in total minimum lease payments.
(b)  Calculated using an adjusted incremental borrowing rate to reduce the present value of the net minimum lease payments to fair value.

See Note 8 under “Long-term Debt – Capital Leases – Georgia Power” for additional information.

Pipeline Charges, Storage Capacity, and Gas Supply
Southern Company Gas has commitments for pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply, which include charges recoverable through 

natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, or alternatively, billed to marketers selling retail natural gas, as well as demand charges associated 

with Southern Company Gas’ wholesale gas services. Gas supply commitments include amounts for gas commodity purchases associated 

with Southern Company Gas’ gas marketing services of 47 million mmBtu at floating gas prices calculated using forward natural gas prices 

at December 31, 2018 and valued at $150 million. Southern Company Gas provides guarantees to certain gas suppliers for certain of its 

subsidiaries in support of payment obligations.

Southern Company Gas’ expected future contractual obligations for pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply that are not 

recognized on the balance sheets at December 31, 2018 were as follows:

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024 and thereafter
Total

Pipeline Charges, 
Storage Capacity, 
and Gas Supply

(in millions)

$ 781
584
520
489
412
1,871
$4,657

159

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Operating Leases
In addition to the operating lease PPAs discussed previously, the Southern Company system has operating lease agreements with various 

terms and expiration dates. The traditional electric operating companies’ operating leases primarily relate to facilities, coal railcars, vehicles, 

cellular tower space, and other equipment. Southern Power’s operating leases primarily relate to land for solar and wind facilities and are 

recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term, plus any renewal periods necessary to cover the expected life of the 

respective facility. Southern Company Gas’ operating leases primarily relate to facilities and vehicles.

Total rent expense for 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:

2018
2017
2016

Southern 
Company(*)

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 

Power(*)

$192
176
169

$23
25
18

(in millions)

$34
31
28

$4
3
3

$31
29
22

(*)  Includes contingent rent expense related to Southern Power’s land leases based on wind production and escalation in the Consumer Price Index for All 

Urban Consumers.

2018
2017
Successor – July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Predecessor – January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016

Southern  
Company  
Gas

(in millions)

$15
15
8
6

The registrants exclude contingent rent but include any step rents, fixed escalations, lease concessions, and lease extensions to cover the 

expected life of the facility in the computation of minimum lease payments. At December 31, 2018, estimated minimum lease payments 

under operating leases were as follows:

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024 and thereafter
Total

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

(in millions)

$ 156
134
110
98
79
1,040
$1,617

$12
10
7
6
3
1
$39

$23
18
9
6
5
13
$74

$ 3
2
1
1
1
2
$10

$ 23
24
24
24
26
874
$995

Southern 
Company
Gas

$ 18
16
15
13
10
34
$106

For the traditional electric operating companies, a majority of the railcar and barge lease expenses are recoverable through fuel cost 

recovery provisions.

In addition to the above rental commitments, Alabama Power and Georgia Power have potential obligations upon expiration of certain 

railcar leases with respect to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have terms expiring in 2023 for Alabama Power and 

in 2024 for Georgia Power with maximum obligations under these leases of $12 million for Alabama Power and $9 million for Georgia 

Power. At the termination of the leases, Alabama Power and Georgia Power may renew the leases, exercise their purchase options, or the 

property can be sold to a third party. Alabama Power and Georgia Power expect that the fair market value of the leased property would 

substantially reduce or, for Alabama Power, potentially eliminate the loss under the residual value obligations.

160

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Guarantees
Alabama Power has guaranteed unconditionally the obligation of SEGCO under an installment sale agreement for the purchase of certain 

pollution control facilities at SEGCO’s generating units, pursuant to which $25 million principal amount of pollution control revenue bonds 

are outstanding and mature in June 2019. Alabama Power also guaranteed a $100 million principal amount long-term bank loan entered into 

by SEGCO on November 28, 2018. Georgia Power has agreed to reimburse Alabama Power for the portion of such obligations corresponding 

to Georgia Power’s proportionate ownership of SEGCO’s stock if Alabama Power is called upon to make such payment under its guarantee. 

At December 31, 2018, the capitalization of SEGCO consisted of $90 million of equity and $125 million of long-term debt, on which the 

annual interest requirement is $4 million. In addition, SEGCO had short-term debt outstanding of $5 million. See Note 7 under “SEGCO” for 

additional information.

In 2013, Georgia Power entered into an agreement that requires Georgia Power to guarantee certain payments of a gas supplier for Plant 

McIntosh for a period up to 15 years. The agreement was subsequently amended on May 31, 2018. The guarantee is expected to be 

terminated if certain events occur by October 2019. In the event the gas supplier defaults on payments, the maximum potential exposure 

under the guarantee and amendment is approximately $30 million.

In October 2017, Atlantic Coast Pipeline executed a $3.4 billion revolving credit facility with a stated maturity date of October 2021. 

Southern Company Gas entered into a guarantee agreement to support its share of the revolving credit facility. Southern Company Gas’ 

maximum exposure to loss under the terms of the guarantee is limited to 5% of the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility, 

and totaled $72 million as of December 31, 2018. See Note 2 under “FERC Matters – Southern Company Gas” for additional information 

regarding the Atlantic Coast Pipeline.

As discussed above under “Operating Leases,” Alabama Power and Georgia Power have entered into certain residual value guarantees 

related to railcar leases.

NOTE 10. INCOME TAXES

Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and the registrants file various state income tax returns, some of which 

are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary’s current and 

deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed 

a separate income tax return. PowerSecure and Southern Company Gas became participants in the income tax allocation agreement as 

of May 9, 2016 and July 1, 2016, respectively. See Note 15 for additional information on these acquisitions, as well as disposition activity 

during 2018. In accordance with IRS regulations, each company is jointly and severally liable for the federal tax liability. Prior to the Merger, 

Southern Company Gas filed a U.S. federal consolidated income tax return and various state income tax returns.

Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – “Income Tax Accounting 

Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment 

date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the 

enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, the registrants considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as 

a result of the Tax Reform Legislation “provisional” as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing the 2017 tax return in 

the fourth quarter 2018. As of December 31, 2018, each of the registrants considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform 

Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to 

be complete.

However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each respective state’s 

adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain 

impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and each state regulatory commission. The ultimate impact 

of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 for additional information.

161

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportSouthern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

$ 167
231
398

188
(137)
51
$ 449

$ 91
123
214

26
51
77
$291

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

$ (62)
(6)
(68)

37
173
210
$142

$136
336
472

23
73
96
$568

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

$1,184
(342)
842

(108)
217
109
$ 951

$103
339
442

20
69
89
$531

2018
Georgia
Power

(in millions)

$ 393
(249)
144

81
(11)
70
$ 214

2017
Georgia
Power

(in millions)

$256
504
760

116
(46)
70
$830

2016
Georgia
Power

(in millions)

$391
319
710

6
64
70
$780

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

$(567)
575
8

(10)
(100)
(110)
$(102)

$ 85
(154)
(69)

(9)
(86)
(95)
$(164)

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

$ 194
(753)
(559)

—
27
27
$(532)

$(566)
(312)
(878)

(110)
49
(61)
$(939)

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

$ (31)
(60)
(91)

(6)
(7)
(13)
$(104)

$

928
(1,098)
(170)

(60)
35
(25)
$ (195)

Notes to Financial Statements

Current and Deferred Income Taxes
Details of income tax provisions are as follows:

Federal —
Current
Deferred

State —
Current
Deferred

Total

Federal —
Current
Deferred

State —
Current
Deferred

Total

Federal —
Current
Deferred

State —
Current
Deferred

Total

162

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Federal —
Current
Deferred

State —
Current
Deferred

Total

Southern Company Gas

Successor

Predecessor

Year Ended 
December 31, 2018

Year Ended 
December 31, 2017

July 1, 2016 through
December 31, 2016

January 1, 2016 through
June 30, 2016

(in millions)

(in millions)

$334
33
367

131
(34)
97
$464

$103
170
273

27
67
94
$367

$ —
65
65

(16)
27
11
$ 76

$67
8
75

12
—
12
$87

Southern Company’s and Southern Power’s ITCs and PTCs generated in the current tax year and carried forward from prior tax years that 

cannot be utilized in the current tax year are reclassified from current to deferred taxes in federal income tax expense in the tables above. 

Southern Power’s ITCs and PTCs reclassified in this manner include $128 million for 2018, $316 million for 2017, and $1.13 billion for 2016. 

These ITCs and PTCs for Southern Company and Southern Power are included in “Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities” herein.

In accordance with regulatory requirements, federal ITCs for the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution 

utilities, as well as certain state ITCs for Nicor Gas, are deferred, and, upon utilization, amortized over the average life of the related 

property with such amortization normally applied as a credit to reduce depreciation in the statements of income. Southern Power’s 

deferred federal ITCs are amortized to income tax expense over the life of the respective asset. ITCs amortized in 2018, 2017, and 2016 

were immaterial for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, and Southern Company Gas and were as follows for Southern 

Company and Southern Power:

2018
2017
2016

Southern Company

Southern Power

(in millions)

$87
79
59

$58
57
37

Southern Power received $5 million of cash related to federal ITCs under renewable energy initiatives in 2018. No cash was received in 

2017 or 2016. Southern Power recognized tax credits and reduced the tax basis of the asset by 50% of the ITCs received, resulting in a net 

deferred tax asset. Southern Power has elected to recognize the tax benefit of this basis difference as a reduction to income tax expense in 

the year in which the plant reaches commercial operation. The tax benefit of the related basis differences reduced income tax expense by 

$1 million in 2018, $18 million in 2017, and $173 million in 2016. See “Unrecognized Tax Benefits” herein for further information.

State ITCs and other state credits, which are recognized in the period in which the credits are generated, reduced Georgia Power’s income 
tax expense by $21 million in 2018, $37 million in 2017, and $31 million in 2016 and reduced Southern Power’s income tax expense by 

$32 million in 2017 and $7 million in 2016.

Southern Power’s federal and state PTCs, which are recognized in the period in which the credits are generated, reduced Southern Power’s 

income tax expense by $141 million in 2018, $139 million in 2017, and $50 million in 2016.

Legal Entity Reorganizations
In April 2018, Southern Power completed the final stage of a legal entity reorganization of various direct and indirect subsidiaries that 

own and operate substantially all of its solar facilities, including certain subsidiaries owned in partnership with various third parties. In 

September 2018, Southern Power also completed a legal entity reorganization of eight operating wind facilities under a new holding 

company, SP Wind. The reorganizations resulted in net state tax benefits related to certain changes in apportionment rates totaling 

approximately $65 million, which were recorded in 2018.

Effective Tax Rate
Southern Company’s effective tax rate is typically lower than the statutory rate due to employee stock plans’ dividend deduction, 

non-taxable AFUDC equity at the traditional electric operating companies, flowback of excess deferred income taxes at the regulated 

utilities, and federal income tax benefits from ITCs and PTCs primarily at Southern Power. Each registrant’s effective tax rate for 2018 
varied significantly as compared to 2017 due to the 14% lower 2018 federal tax rate resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation.

163

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:

Federal statutory rate
State income tax, net of federal deduction
Employee stock plans’ dividend deduction
Non-deductible book depreciation
Flowback of excess deferred income taxes
AFUDC-Equity
ITC basis difference
Federal PTCs
Amortization of ITC
Tax impact from sale of subsidiaries
Tax Reform Legislation
Noncontrolling interests
Other
Effective income tax (benefit) rate

Federal statutory rate
State income tax, net of federal deduction
Employee stock plans’ dividend deduction
Non-deductible book depreciation
Flowback of excess deferred income taxes
AFUDC-Equity
AFUDC-Equity portion of Kemper IGCC charge
ITC basis difference
Federal PTCs
Amortization of ITC
Tax Reform Legislation
Noncontrolling interests
Other
Effective income tax (benefit) rate

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

21.0%
1.8
(1.0)
0.8
(4.0)
(1.0)
(0.6)
(4.7)
(2.0)
8.6
(1.4)
(0.4)
(0.8)
16.3%

21.0%
5.0
—
0.6
(1.8)
(1.0)
—
—
(0.1)
—
—
—
(0.1)
23.6%

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

35.0%
12.5
(4.0)
3.1
(0.3)
(2.6)
15.7
(1.7)
(12.1)
(4.2)
(25.6)
(1.4)
(1.1)
13.3%

35.0%
4.5
—
0.9
—
(1.0)
—
—
—
(0.2)
0.3
—
0.1
39.6%

2018
Georgia
Power

21.0%
5.5
—
1.2
—
(1.4)
—
—
(0.2)
—
(4.9)
—
0.1
21.3%

2017
Georgia
Power

35.0%
2.0
—
0.7
(0.1)
(0.6)
—
—
—
(0.1)
(0.4)
—
0.2
36.7%

(*)  Represents effective income tax benefit rate for Mississippi Power due to a loss before income taxes in 2017.

Federal statutory rate
State income tax, net of federal deduction
Employee stock plans’ dividend deduction
Non-deductible book depreciation
Flowback of excess deferred income taxes
AFUDC-Equity
ITC basis difference
Federal PTCs
Amortization of ITC
Noncontrolling interests
Other
Effective income tax (benefit) rate

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

35.0%
2.0
(1.2)
0.9
(0.1)
(2.0)
(5.0)
(1.2)
(0.9)
(0.3)
0.1
27.3%

35.0%
4.2
—
1.0
—
(0.7)
—
—
(0.2)
—
(0.5)
38.8%

2016
Georgia
Power

35.0%
2.1
—
0.8
(0.1)
(0.8)
—
—
(0.2)
—
(0.1)
36.7%

(*)  Represents effective income tax benefit rate for Mississippi Power due to a loss before income taxes in 2016.

164

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

21.0%
(65.1)
—
0.7
(4.1)
—
—
—
(0.2)
—
(26.3)
—
(1.4)
(75.4)%

21.0%
(90.8)
—
—
—
—
(0.2)
(156.6)
(55.4)
—
96.1
(14.9)
2.0
(198.8)%

Mississippi 
Power(*)

Southern 
Power

(35.0)%
0.6
—
0.1
—
—
5.3
—
—
—
11.9
—
—
(17.1)%

35.0%
(22.2)
—
—
—
—
—
(10.0)
(72.5)
(20.6)
(416.1)
(8.6)
(10.7)
(525.7)%

Mississippi 
Power(*)

Southern 
Power

(35.0)%
(5.7)
—
0.7
(0.3)
(28.5)
—
—
(0.1)
—
0.4
(68.5)%

35.0%
(9.1)
—
—
—
—
(96.3)
(23.3)
(13.4)
(6.2)
4.7
(108.6)%

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Southern Company Gas

Successor

Predecessor

Year Ended  
December 31, 2018

Year Ended  
December 31, 2017

July 1, 2016 through
December 31, 2016

January 1, 2016 through
June 30, 2016

Federal statutory rate
State income tax, net of federal deduction
Flowback of excess deferred income taxes
Amortization of ITC
Tax impact on sale of subsidiaries
Tax Reform Legislation
Other
Effective income tax rate

21.0%
9.2
(3.0)
(0.1)
28.5
(0.4)
0.3
55.5%

35.0%
10.0
(0.2)
(0.2)
—
15.0
0.6
60.2%

35.0%
3.6
—
(0.4)
—
—
1.8
40.0%

35.0%
3.5
—
—
—
—
(0.9)
37.6%

Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
The tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements of the 

registrants and their respective tax bases, which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities, are as follows:

Deferred tax liabilities —

Accelerated depreciation
Property basis differences
Federal effect of net state deferred tax assets
Leveraged lease basis differences
Employee benefit obligations
Premium on reacquired debt
Regulatory assets –

Storm damage reserves
Employee benefit obligations
AROs

AROs
Other

Total deferred income tax liabilities
Deferred tax assets —

Federal effect of net state deferred tax liabilities
Employee benefit obligations
Other property basis differences
ITC and PTC carryforward
Alternative minimum tax carryforward
Other partnership basis difference
Other comprehensive losses
AROs
Estimated loss on plants under construction
Other deferred state tax attributes
Regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform 

Legislation (not subject to normalization)

Other

Total deferred income tax assets
Valuation allowance
Net deferred income tax assets
Net deferred income taxes (assets)/liabilities
Recognized in the balance sheets:
Accumulated deferred income taxes – assets
Accumulated deferred income taxes – liabilities

December 31, 2018

Southern 
Company

Alabama  
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern  
Power

(in millions)

Southern  
Company  
Gas

$ 8,461
1,807
—
253
477
88

111
975
1,232
1,210
593
15,207

260
1,273
251
2,730
62
162
82
2,442
346
415

$2,236
865
—
—
149
14

—
260
276
607
177
4,584

155
286
—
11
—
—
10
883
—
—

$3,005
633
—
—
290
74

111
344
925
575
141
6,098

71
444
61
430
—
—
3
1,500
283
19

$ 335
162
36
—
25
—

$ 1,483
—
—
—
6
—

—
45
31
—
68
702

—
62
—
—
32
—
—
31
63
251

—
—
—
—
34
1,523

22
7
172
2,128
21
162
—
—
—
72

$1,176
134
—
—
6
—

—
45
—
—
132
1,493

46
150
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

294
731
9,048
(123)
8,925
$ 6,282

130
147
1,622
—
1,622
$2,962

127
140
3,078
(42)
3,036
$3,062

29
47
515
(41)
474
$ 228

—
47
2,631
(27)
2,604
$(1,081)

8
285
489
(12)
477
$1,016

(276)
$
$ 6,558

$ —
$2,962

$ —
$3,062

$(150)
$ 378

$(1,186)
105
$

$ —
$1,016

165

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Deferred tax liabilities —

Accelerated depreciation
Property basis differences
Federal effect of net state deferred tax assets
Leveraged lease basis differences
Employee benefit obligations
Premium on reacquired debt
Regulatory assets –

Storm damage reserves
Employee benefit obligations
AROs

AROs
Other

Total deferred income tax liabilities
Deferred tax assets —

Federal effect of net state deferred tax liabilities
Employee benefit obligations
Other property basis differences
ITC and PTC carryforward
Federal NOL carryforward
Alternative minimum tax carryforward
Other partnership basis difference
Other comprehensive losses
AROs
Estimated loss on plants under construction
Other deferred state tax attributes
Regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform 

Legislation (not subject to normalization)

Other

Total deferred income tax assets
Valuation allowance
Net deferred income tax assets
Net deferred income taxes (assets)/liabilities
Recognized in the balance sheets:
Accumulated deferred income taxes – assets
Accumulated deferred income taxes – liabilities

December 31, 2017

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

(in millions)

Southern 
Company 
Gas

$ 9,059
1,853
—
251
527
54

89
1,044
821
370
689
14,757

330
1,339
343
2,414
518
69
23
84
1,191
722
330

$2,135
725
—
—
162
16

—
260
249
220
147
3,914

143
286
—
9
—
—
—
10
469
—
—

$2,889
606
—
—
287
34

89
349
501
130
140
5,025

85
448
59
403
—
—
—
4
631
—
6

$ 303
207
9
—
28
—

$ 1,922
2
—
—
7
—

—
46
33
—
73
699

—
62
—
—
40
32
—
—
33
722
133

—
—
—
—
30
1,961

42
8
184
2,002
333
21
23
1
—
—
77

$1,150
204
—
—
4
—

—
75
—
—
208
1,641

54
185
—
—
92
—
—
—
—
—
—

304
538
8,205
(184)
8,021
$ 6,736

126
111
1,154
—
1,154
$2,760

123
91
1,850
—
1,850
$3,175

27
54
1,103
(157)
946
$ (247)

—
9
2,700
(13)
2,687
$ (726)

9
223
563
(11)
552
$1,089

$ (106)
$ 6,842

$ —
$2,760

$ —
$3,175

$ (247)
$ —

$ (925)
199
$

$ —
$1,089

The implementation of the Tax Reform Legislation significantly reduced accumulated deferred income taxes in 2017, partially offset by 

bonus depreciation provisions in the PATH Act.

The traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities have tax-related regulatory assets (deferred income tax 

charges) and regulatory liabilities (deferred income tax credits). The regulatory assets are primarily attributable to tax benefits flowed 

through to customers in prior years, deferred taxes previously recognized at rates lower than the current enacted tax law, and taxes 

applicable to capitalized interest. The regulatory liabilities are primarily attributable to deferred taxes previously recognized at rates higher 

than the current enacted tax law and to unamortized ITCs. See Note 2 for each registrant’s related balances at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

166

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Tax Credit Carryforwards
Federal ITC/PTC carryforwards at December 31, 2018 were as follows:

Federal ITC/PTC carryforwards
Year in which federal ITC/PTC carryforwards begin expiring
Year by which federal ITC/PTC carryforwards are expected to be utilized

$2,410
2032
2022

(in millions)

$ 11
2033
2021

$ 108
2032
2021

$2,128
2034
2022

Southern 
Company

Alabama
Power

Georgia
Power

Southern
Power

The estimated tax credit utilization reflects the 2018 abandonment loss related to certain Kemper County energy facility expenditures 

as well as the projected taxable gains on the various sale transactions described in Note 15 and “Legal Entity Reorganizations” herein. 

The expected utilization of tax credit carryforwards could be further delayed by numerous factors, including the acquisition of additional 

renewable projects, the purchase of rights to additional PTCs of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement 

or the Global Amendments, and changes in taxable income projections. See Note 2 under “Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction” for 

additional information on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.

At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power also had approximately $341 million in state investment and other state tax credit carryforwards 

for the State of Georgia that will expire between 2020 and 2028 and are not expected to be fully utilized. Georgia Power has a net state 

valuation allowance of $33 million associated with these carryforwards.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

Net Operating Loss Carryforwards
In the 2018 tax year, Southern Company expects to fully utilize the carryforward from federal NOLs generated in 2016 and 2017.

At December 31, 2018, the state and local NOL carryforwards for Southern Company’s subsidiaries were as follows:

Company/Jurisdiction

Mississippi Power
Mississippi

Southern Power
Oklahoma
Florida
South Carolina
Other states
Southern Power Total

Other(*)
Georgia
New York
New York City
Other states
Southern Company Total

Approximate NOL 
Carryforwards

Approximate Net State 
Income Tax Benefit

Tax Year NOL
Begins Expiring

(in millions)

$5,062

846
264
62
42
$1,214

358
223
208
278
$7,343

$200

40
11
2
3
$ 56

16
11
15
14
$312

2031

2035
2033
2034
2029

2019
2036
2036
Various

(*)  Represents other Southern Company subsidiaries. Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Southern Company Gas did not have state NOL carryforwards at 

December 31, 2018.

State NOLs for Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Florida are not expected to be fully utilized prior to expiration. At December 31, 2018, 

Mississippi Power had a net state valuation allowance of $32 million for the Mississippi NOL and Southern Power had a net state valuation 

allowance of $9 million for the Oklahoma NOL and $11 million for the Florida NOL.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

167

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Unrecognized Tax Benefits
Unrecognized tax benefits changes in 2018, 2017, and 2016 for Southern Company, Mississippi Power, and Southern Power are provided 

below. The remaining registrants did not have any material unrecognized tax benefits for the periods presented.

Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2015
Tax positions changes –

Increase from current periods
Increase from prior periods
Decrease from prior periods

Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016
Tax positions changes –

Increase from current periods
Increase from prior periods
Decrease from prior periods
Reductions due to settlements
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2017
Tax positions changes –

Decrease from prior periods

Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018

Southern 
Company

$ 433

Mississippi  
Power

(in millions)
$ 421

Southern 
Power

$ 8

45
21
(15)
484

10
10
(196)
(290)
18

(18)
$ —

26
18
—
465

—
2
(177)
(290)
—

—
$ —

17
—
(8)
17

—
—
(17)
—
—

—
$ —

Mississippi Power’s tax positions increase from current and prior periods for 2017 and 2016 relate to state tax benefits, deductions for R&E 

expenditures, and charitable contribution carryforwards that were impacted as a result of the settlement of R&E expenditures associated 

with the Kemper County energy facility, as well as federal income tax benefits from deferred ITCs. Mississippi Power’s tax positions 

decrease from prior periods and the reductions due to settlements for 2017 relate primarily to the settlement of R&E expenditures 

associated with the Kemper County energy facility. See Note 2 under “Mississippi Power – Kemper County Energy Facility” and “Section 

174 Research and Experimental Deduction” herein for more information.

Southern Power’s increase in unrecognized tax benefits from current periods for 2016, and the decrease from prior periods for 2017 and 

2016, primarily relate to federal income tax benefits from deferred ITCs.

There were no unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018. The impact on the effective tax rate of Southern Company, Mississippi 

Power, and Southern Power, if recognized, was as follows for 2017 and 2016:

2017
Tax positions impacting the effective tax rate
Tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits
2016
Tax positions impacting the effective tax rate
Tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits

Southern 
Company

Mississippi  
Power

(in millions)

Southern  
Power

$ 18
—
$ 18

$ 20
464
$484

$ —
—
$ —

$ 1
464
$465

$ —
—
$ —

$17
—
$17

Mississippi Power’s tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate for 2016 relate to deductions for R&E expenditures associated with 

the Kemper County energy facility. See “Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction” herein for more information. These amounts 

are presented on a gross basis without considering the related federal or state income tax impact.

Southern Power’s impact on the effective tax rate was determined based on the amount of ITCs, which were uncertain.

All of the registrants classify interest on tax uncertainties as interest expense. Accrued interest for all tax positions other than the Section 

174 R&E deductions was immaterial for all years presented. None of the registrants accrued any penalties on uncertain tax positions.

It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits could change within 12 months. New audit findings or 

settlements associated with ongoing audits could result in significant unrecognized tax benefits. At this time, a range of reasonably possible 
outcomes cannot be determined.

168

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

The IRS has finalized its audits of Southern Company’s consolidated federal income tax returns through 2017, as well as the pre-Merger 

Southern Company Gas tax returns. Southern Company is a participant in the Compliance Assurance Process of the IRS. The audits for the 

registrants’ state income tax returns have either been concluded, or the statute of limitations has expired, for years prior to 2012.

Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction
Southern Company, on behalf of Mississippi Power, has reflected deductions for R&E expenditures related to the Kemper County energy 

facility in its federal income tax calculations since 2013 and filed amended federal income tax returns for 2008 through 2013 to also 

include such deductions. In September 2017, the U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Taxation approved a settlement between Southern 

Company and the IRS, resolving a methodology for these deductions. As a result of this approval, Mississippi Power recognized $176 million 

in 2017 of previously unrecognized tax benefits and reversed $36 million of associated accrued interest.

NOTE 11. RETIREMENT BENEFITS

The Southern Company system has a qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering substantially all employees, with the 

exception of employees at PowerSecure. The qualified defined benefit pension plan is funded in accordance with requirements of the 

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for 

the year ended December 31, 2018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated for the year ending 

December 31, 2019. The Southern Company system also provides certain non-qualified defined benefits for a select group of management 

and highly compensated employees, which are funded on a cash basis. In addition, the Southern Company system provides certain 

medical care and life insurance benefits for retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans. The traditional electric operating 

companies fund other postretirement trusts to the extent required by their respective regulatory commissions. Southern Company Gas 

has a separate unfunded supplemental retirement health care plan that provides medical care and life insurance benefits to employees of 

discontinued businesses. For the year ending December 31, 2019, no other postretirement trust contributions are expected.

On January 1, 2018, the qualified defined benefit pension plan of Southern Company Gas was merged into the Southern Company 

system’s qualified defined benefit pension plan and the pension plan was reopened to all non-union employees of Southern Company Gas. 

Prior to January 1, 2018, Southern Company Gas had a separate qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering certain eligible 

employees, which was closed in 2012 to new employees. Also on January 1, 2018, Southern Company Gas’ non-qualified retirement plans 

were merged into the Southern Company system’s non-qualified retirement plan (defined benefit and defined contribution).

Effective in December 2017, 538 employees transferred from SCS to Southern Power. Accordingly, Southern Power assumed various 

compensation and benefit plans including participation in the Southern Company system’s qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan 

covering substantially all employees. With the transfer of employees, Southern Power assumed the related benefit obligations from SCS of 

$139 million for the qualified pension plan (along with trust assets of $138 million) and $11 million for other postretirement benefit plans, 

together with $36 million in prior service costs and net gains/losses in OCI. In 2018, Southern Power also began providing certain defined 

benefits under the non-qualified pension plan for a select group of management and highly compensated employees. No obligation related 

to these benefits was assumed in the employee transfer; however, obligations for services rendered by employees following the transfer 

are being recognized by Southern Power and are funded on a cash basis. In addition, Southern Power provides certain medical care and life 

insurance benefits for retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans that are funded on a cash basis. Prior to the transfer 

of employees in December 2017, substantially all expenses charged by SCS, including pension and other postretirement benefit costs, 

were recorded in Southern Power’s other operations and maintenance expense. The disclosures included herein exclude Southern Power for 

periods prior to the transfer of employees in December 2017.

On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 under “Southern Company’s 

Sale of Gulf Power” for additional information. The portion of the Southern Company system’s pension and other postretirement benefit 

plans attributable to Gulf Power that is reflected in Southern Company’s consolidated balance sheet as held for sale at December 31, 2018 

consists of:

Projected benefit obligation
Plan assets
Accrued liability

Pension
Plans

$526
492
$ (34)

Other 
Postretirement 
Benefit Plans

(in millions)

$ 69
17
$(52)

All amounts presented in the remainder of this note reflect the benefit plan obligations and related plan assets for the Southern Company 
system’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including the amounts attributable to Gulf Power.

169

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Actuarial Assumptions
The weighted average rates assumed in the actuarial calculations used to determine both the net periodic costs for the pension and other 

postretirement benefit plans for the following year and the benefit obligations as of the measurement date are presented below.

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

3.80%
3.45
3.98
7.95
4.34

3.68%
3.29
3.91
6.83
4.34

3.81%
3.45
4.00
7.95
4.46

3.71%
3.31
3.93
6.83
4.46

2018
Georgia 
Power

3.79%
3.42
3.99
7.95
4.46

3.68%
3.29
3.91
6.80
4.46

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

3.80%
3.46
3.99
7.95
4.46

3.68%
3.29
3.91
6.99
4.46

3.94%
3.69
4.01
7.95
4.46

3.81%
3.47
3.93
—
4.46

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

2017

4.40%
3.77
4.81
7.92
4.37

4.23%
3.54
4.64
6.84
4.37

4.44%
3.76
4.85
7.95
4.46

4.27%
3.58
4.70
6.83
4.46

4.40%
3.72
4.83
7.95
4.46

4.23%
3.55
4.63
6.79
4.46

4.44%
3.81
4.83
7.95
4.46

4.22%
3.55
4.65
6.88
4.46

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

2016

4.58%
3.88
4.98
8.16
4.37

4.38%
3.66
4.85
6.66
4.37

4.67%
3.90
5.07
8.20
4.46

4.51%
3.69
4.96
6.83
4.46

4.65%
3.86
5.03
8.20
4.46

4.49%
3.67
4.88
6.27
4.46

4.69%
3.97
5.04
8.20
4.46

4.47%
3.66
4.88
7.07
4.46

Assumptions used to determine net 
periodic costs:
Pension plans

Discount rate – benefit obligations
Discount rate – interest costs
Discount rate – service costs
Expected long-term return on plan assets
Annual salary increase

Other postretirement benefit plans
Discount rate – benefit obligations
Discount rate – interest costs
Discount rate – service costs
Expected long-term return on plan assets
Annual salary increase

Assumptions used to determine net 
periodic costs:
Pension plans

Discount rate – benefit obligations
Discount rate – interest costs
Discount rate – service costs
Expected long-term return on plan assets
Annual salary increase

Other postretirement benefit plans
Discount rate – benefit obligations
Discount rate – interest costs
Discount rate – service costs
Expected long-term return on plan assets
Annual salary increase

Assumptions used to determine net 
periodic costs:
Pension plans

Discount rate – benefit obligations
Discount rate – interest costs
Discount rate – service costs
Expected long-term return on plan assets
Annual salary increase

Other postretirement benefit plans
Discount rate – benefit obligations
Discount rate – interest costs
Discount rate – service costs
Expected long-term return on plan assets
Annual salary increase

170

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Assumptions used to determine net 
periodic costs:
Pension plans

Discount rate – benefit obligations
Discount rate – interest costs
Discount rate – service costs
Expected long-term return on plan assets
Annual salary increase
Pension band increase(*)

Other postretirement benefit plans
Discount rate - benefit obligations
Discount rate – interest costs
Discount rate – service costs
Expected long-term return on plan assets
Annual salary increase

Southern Company Gas

Successor

Year Ended 
December 31, 2018

Year Ended 
December 31, 2017

July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016

Predecessor

January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016

3.74%
3.41
3.84
7.95
3.07
N/A

3.62%
3.21
3.82
5.89
3.07

4.39%
3.76
4.64
7.60
3.50
N/A

4.15%
3.40
4.55
6.03
3.50

3.85%
3.21
4.07
7.75
3.50
2.00

3.61%
2.84
3.96
5.93
3.50

4.60%
4.00
4.80
7.80
3.70
2.00

4.40%
3.60
4.70
6.60
3.70

(*)  Only applicable to Nicor Gas union employees. The pension bands for the former Nicor Gas plan reflect the negotiated rates in accordance with the 

union agreements.

Assumptions used to determine 
benefit obligations:
Pension plans
Discount rate
Annual salary increase

Other postretirement benefit plans

Discount rate
Annual salary increase

Assumptions used to determine 
benefit obligations:
Pension plans
Discount rate
Annual salary increase

Other postretirement benefit plans

Discount rate
Annual salary increase

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas

2018

4.49%
4.34

4.37%
4.34

4.51%
4.46

4.40%
4.46

4.48%
4.46

4.36%
4.46

4.49%
4.46

4.35%
4.46

4.65%
4.46

4.50%
4.46

4.47%
3.07

4.32%
3.07

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas

2017

3.80%
4.32

3.68%
4.32

3.81%
4.46

3.71%
4.46

3.79%
4.46

3.68%
4.46

3.80%
4.46

3.68%
4.46

3.94%
4.46

3.81%
4.46

3.74%
2.88

3.62%
2.56

The registrants estimate the expected rate of return on pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets using a financial model 

to project the expected return on each current investment portfolio. The analysis projects an expected rate of return on each of the 

different asset classes in order to arrive at the expected return on the entire portfolio relying on each trust’s target asset allocation and 

reasonable capital market assumptions. The financial model is based on four key inputs: anticipated returns by asset class (based in part on 

historical returns), each trust’s target asset allocation, an anticipated inflation rate, and the projected impact of a periodic rebalancing of 

each trust’s portfolio.

171

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

An additional assumption used in measuring the accumulated other postretirement benefit obligations (APBO) was a weighted average 

medical care cost trend rate. The weighted average medical care cost trend rates used in measuring the APBO for the registrants at 

December 31, 2018 were as follows:

Pre-65
Post-65 medical
Post-65 prescription

Initial Cost 
Trend Rate

Ultimate Cost 
Trend Rate

Year That Ultimate 
Rate is Reached

6.50%
5.00
8.00

4.50%
4.50
4.50

2028
2028
2028

Pension Plans
The total accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans at December 31, 2018 and 2017 was as follows:

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

December 31, 2018
December 31, 2017

$11,683
12,577

$ 2,550
2,696

Georgia 
Power

$ 3,613
3,847

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas

(in millions)

$513
541

$101
111

$ 842
1,139

The actuarial gain of $1.1 billion recorded in the remeasurement of the Southern Company system pension plans at December 31, 2018 

was primarily due to a 69 basis point increase in the overall discount rate used to calculate the benefit obligation as a result of higher 

market interest rates. The actuarial loss of $1.3 billion recorded in the remeasurement of the Southern Company system pension plans at 

December 31, 2017 was primarily due to a 60 basis point decrease in the overall discount rate used to calculate the benefit obligation as a 

result of lower market interest rates.

Changes in the projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 

were as follows:

Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Dispositions
Service cost
Interest cost
Benefits paid
Actuarial (gain) loss
Balance at end of year
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Dispositions
Actual return (loss) on plan assets
Employer contributions
Benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Accrued liability

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas

(in millions)

2018

$13,808
(107)
359
464
(618)
(1,143)
12,763

12,992
(107)
(711)
55
(618)
11,611
$ (1,152)

$2,998
—
78
101
(124)
(237)
2,816

2,836
—
(150)
13
(124)
2,575
$ (241)

$4,188
—
87
139
(191)
(318)
3,905

4,058
—
(218)
14
(191)
3,663
$ (242)

$602
—
17
20
(24)
(58)
557

563
—
(37)
3
(24)
505
$ (52)

$139
(3)
9
5
(3)
(24)
123

138
(3)
(9)
—
(3)
123
$ —

$1,184
(104)
34
39
(98)
(148)
907

1,068
(104)
(70)
2
(98)
798
$ (109)

172

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Benefits paid
Plan amendments
Actuarial (gain) loss
Obligations assumed from employee transfer
Balance at end of year
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Actual return (loss) on plan assets
Employer contributions
Benefits paid
Assets assumed from employee transfer
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Accrued liability

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas

(in millions)

2017

$12,385
293
455
(596)
(26)
1,297
—
13,808

11,583
1,953
52
(596)
—
12,992
$ (816)

$2,663
63
98
(120)
—
294
—
2,998

2,517
427
12
(120)
—
2,836
$ (162)

$3,800
74
138
(187)
—
363
—
4,188

3,621
610
14
(187)
—
4,058
$ (130)

$534
15
20
(22)
—
55
—
602

499
84
2
(22)
—
563
$ (39)

$ —
—
—
—
—
—
139
139

—
—
—
—
138
138
$ (1)

$1,133
23
42
(91)
(26)
103
—
1,184

983
175
1
(91)
—
1,068
$ (116)

The projected benefit obligations for the qualified and non-qualified pension plans at December 31, 2018 are shown in the following table. 

All pension plan assets are related to the qualified pension plan.

Projected benefit obligations:

Qualified pension plan
Non-qualified pension plan

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas

(in millions)

$12,135
629

$2,692
124

$3,757
148

$527
30

$122
1

$866
41

Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the registrants’ pension plans consist of the following:

December 31, 2018:
Prepaid pension costs
Other regulatory assets, deferred
Other deferred charges and assets
Other current liabilities
Employee benefit obligations
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred
AOCI

December 31, 2017:
Prepaid pension costs
Other regulatory assets, deferred
Other deferred charges and assets
Other current liabilities
Employee benefit obligations
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred
AOCI

Southern
Company(*)

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas

(in millions)

$ —
3,566
—
(55)
(1,097)
(108)
97

$ —
3,273
—
(53)
(763)
(118)
107

$ —
955
—
(12)
(229)
—
—

$ —
890
—
(12)
(150)
—
—

$ —
1,230
—
(15)
(227)
—
—

$

23
1,105
—
(15)
(138)
—
—

$ —
167
—
(3)
(49)
—
—

$ —
158
—
(3)
(36)
—
—

$ 1
—
—
—
(1)
—
26

$ —
—
—
—
(1)
—
33

$ —
160
74
(3)
(179)
—
(44)

$ —
217
85
(3)
(198)
—
(42)

(*)  Amounts for Southern Company exclude regulatory assets of $268 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas’ pension plans 

prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.

173

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Presented below are the amounts included in regulatory assets at December 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the portion of the defined 

benefit pension plan attributable to Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Company Gas that had 

not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost.

Balance at December 31, 2018

Regulatory assets:
Prior service cost
Net (gain) loss
Regulatory amortization(*)

Total regulatory assets (liabilities)

Balance at December 31, 2017

Regulatory assets:
Prior service cost
Net (gain) loss
Regulatory amortization(*)

Total regulatory assets

Southern 
Company(*)

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

(in millions)

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas

$

17
3,441
—
$3,458

$

14
3,140
—
$3,154

$ 6
949
—
$955

$ 8
882
—
$890

$

12
1,218
—
$1,230

$

14
1,091
—
$1,105

$ 2
165
—
$167

$ 3
155
—
$158

$ (17)
83
94
$160

$ (20)
197
40
$217

(*)  Amounts for Southern Company exclude regulatory assets of $268 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas’ pension plans 

prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.

The changes in the balance of regulatory assets related to the portion of the defined benefit pension plan attributable to Southern 

Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Company Gas for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are 

presented in the following table:

Southern 
Company(*)

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

(in millions)

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas

Regulatory assets (liabilities):
Balance at December 31, 2016
Net (gain) loss
Change in prior service costs
Reclassification adjustments:

Amortization of prior service costs
Amortization of net gain (loss)
Amortization of regulatory assets(*)

Total reclassification adjustments
Total change
Balance at December 31, 2017
Net (gain) loss
Change in prior service costs
Dispositions
Reclassification adjustments:

Amortization of prior service costs
Amortization of net gain (loss)
Amortization of regulatory assets

Total reclassification adjustments
Total change
Balance at December 31, 2018

$3,120
227
(26)

(11)
(155)
—
(166)
35
$3,155
498
1
12

(4)
(204)
—
(208)
303
$3,458

$870
64
—

(2)
(42)
—
(44)
20
$890
120
—
—

(1)
(54)
—
(55)
65
$955

$1,129
36
—

(3)
(57)
—
(60)
(24)
$1,105
196
—
—

(2)
(69)
—
(71)
125
$1,230

$154
12
—

(1)
(7)
—
(8)
4
$158
19
—
—

—
(10)
—
(10)
9
$167

$267
(31)
—

—
(18)
(1)
(19)
(50)
$217
20
(18)
(34)

2
(12)
(15)
(25)
(57)
$160

(*)  Amounts for Southern Company exclude regulatory assets of $268 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas’ pension plans 

prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.

174

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Presented below are the amounts included in AOCI at December 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the portion of the defined benefit pension 

plan attributable to Southern Company, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas that had not yet been recognized in net periodic 

pension cost.

Balance at December 31, 2018

AOCI:

Prior service cost
Net (gain) loss

Total AOCI

Balance at December 31, 2017

AOCI:

Prior service cost
Net (gain) loss

Total AOCI

Southern 
Company

Southern 
Power

(in millions)

Southern 
Company Gas

$ (3)
100
$ 97

$

3
104
$107

$ —
26
$26

$ 1
32
$33

$ (6)
(38)
$(44)

$ —
(42)
$(42)

The components of OCI related to the portion of the defined benefit pension plan attributable to Southern Company, Southern Power, and 

Southern Company Gas for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are presented in the following table:

Southern 
Company

Southern
Power

(in millions)

Southern 
Company Gas

AOCI:
Balance at December 31, 2016
Net (gain) loss
Change from employee transfer
Reclassification adjustments:

Amortization of prior service costs
Amortization of net gain (loss)
Total reclassification adjustments
Total change
Balance at December 31, 2017
Net (gain) loss
Dispositions
Reclassification adjustments:

Amortization of net gain (loss)
Total reclassification adjustments
Total change
Balance at December 31, 2018

$100
15
—

(1)
(7)
(8)
7
$107
7
(8)

(9)
(9)
(10)
$ 97

$ —
—
33

—
—
—
33
$33
(5)
—

(2)
(2)
(7)
$26

$(43)
1
—

—
—
—
1
$(42)
6
(8)

—
—
(2)
$(44)

175

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Components of net periodic pension cost for Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Power were 

as follows:

2018:
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Recognized net (gain) loss
Net amortization
Net periodic pension cost

2017:
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Recognized net (gain) loss
Net amortization
Net periodic pension cost

2016:
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Recognized net (gain) loss
Net amortization
Net periodic pension cost

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

(in millions)

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

$ 9
5
(10)
1
—
$ 5

$ 359
464
(943)
213
4
$ 97

$ 293
455
(897)
162
12
$ 25

$ 262
422
(782)
150
14
$ 66

$ 78
101
(207)
54
1
$ 27

$ 63
98
(196)
42
2
9

$

$ 57
95
(184)
40
3
$ 11

$ 87
139
(296)
69
2
1

$

$ 74
138
(283)
57
3
$ (11)

$ 70
136
(258)
55
5
8

$

$ 17
20
(41)
10
—
$ 6

$ 15
20
(40)
7
1
$ 3

$ 13
19
(35)
7
1
$ 5

Components of net periodic pension cost for Southern Company Gas were as follows:

Year Ended 
December 31, 
2018

$ 34
39
(75)
12
15
(2)
$ 23

Southern Company Gas

Successor

Year Ended 
December 31, 
2017

(in millions)

$ 23
42
(70)
18
1
—
$ 14

July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016

$ 15
20
(35)
14
—
(1)
$ 13

Predecessor

January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016

(in millions)

$ 13
21
(33)
13
—
(1)
$ 13

Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Recognized net (gain) loss
Net amortization of regulatory asset
Prior service cost
Net periodic pension cost

Net periodic pension cost is the sum of service cost, interest cost, and other costs netted against the expected return on plan assets. The 

expected return on plan assets is determined by multiplying the expected rate of return on plan assets and the market-related value of 

plan assets. In determining the market-related value of plan assets, the registrants have elected to amortize changes in the market value of 

all plan assets over five years rather than recognize the changes immediately. As a result, the accounting value of plan assets that is used to 

calculate the expected return on plan assets differs from the current fair value of the plan assets.

176

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Future benefit payments reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the projected benefit 

obligation for the pension plans. At December 31, 2018, estimated benefit payments were as follows:

Benefit Payments:
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024 to 2028

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas

(in millions)

$ 623
645
664
687
711
3,869

$132
136
141
147
152
832

$ 201
206
209
215
221
1,183

$ 28
28
29
29
30
166

$ 3
3
4
4
5
27

$ 59
61
62
62
62
313

Other Postretirement Benefits
Changes in the APBO and the fair value of the registrants’ plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were 

as follows:

Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Dispositions
Service cost
Interest cost
Benefits paid
Actuarial (gain) loss
Retiree drug subsidy
Balance at end of year
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Dispositions
Actual return (loss) on plan assets
Employer contributions
Benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Accrued liability

2018

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

(in millions)

$2,339
(18)
24
75
(129)
(432)
6
1,865

1,053
(18)
(57)
73
(123)
928
$ (937)

$ 517
—
6
17
(28)
(111)
2
403

406
—
(25)
5
(26)
360
$ (43)

$ 863
—
6
28
(47)
(178)
3
675

386
—
(20)
22
(44)
344
$(331)

$ 97
—
1
3
(5)
(15)
—
81

25
—
(1)
4
(5)
23
$(58)

$ 11
—
1
—
(1)
(2)
—
9

—
—
—
1
(1)
—
$ (9)

Southern 
Company 
Gas

$ 310
(18)
2
10
(17)
(43)
—
244

125
(18)
(5)
13
(17)
98
$(146)

177

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

2017

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Power

(in millions)

Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Benefits paid
Actuarial (gain) loss
Plan amendments
Retiree drug subsidy
Obligations assumed from employee transfer
Employee contributions
Balance at end of year
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Actual return (loss) on plan assets
Employer contributions
Employee contributions
Benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Accrued liability

$ 2,297
24
79
(136)
65
3
7
—
—
2,339

944
154
84
—
(129)
1,053
$ (1,286)

$ 501
6
17
(29)
20
—
2
—
—
517

367
60
6
—
(27)
406
$ (111)

$ 847
7
29
(51)
28
—
3
—
—
863

354
54
26
—
(48)
386
$ (477)

$ 97
1
3
(6)
1
—
1
—
—
97

23
3
4
—
(5)
25
$(72)

$ —
—
—
—
—
—
—
11
—
11

—
—
—
—
—
—
$(11)

Southern 
Company 
Gas

$ 308
2
10
(19)
3
3
—
—
3
310

105
20
17
3
(20)
125
$ (185)

Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the registrants’ other postretirement benefit plans 

consist of the following:

December 31, 2018:
Other regulatory assets, deferred(a)
Other current liabilities
Employee benefit obligations(b)
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred
AOCI

December 31, 2017:
Other regulatory assets, deferred(a)
Other current liabilities
Employee benefit obligations(b)
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred
AOCI

Southern  
Company(a)

Alabama  
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern
Power

(in millions)

$

99
(6)
(931)
(77)
(4)

$

382
(5)
(1,281)
(41)
4

$ —
—
(43)
(8)
—

$ 63
—
(111)
(7)
—

$ 60
—
(331)
—
—

$ 202
—
(477)
—
—

$ 6
—
(58)
(2)
—

$ 18
—
(72)
(1)
—

$ —
—
(9)
—
1

$ —
—
(11)
—
3

Southern 
Company 
Gas

$

(4)
—
146
—
(4)

$ 46
—
(185)
—
(3)

(a)  Amounts for Southern Company exclude regulatory assets of $57 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas’ other 

postretirement benefit plans prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.

(b)  Included in other deferred credits and liabilities on Southern Power’s consolidated balance sheets.

178

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Presented below are the amounts included in net regulatory assets (liabilities) at December 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the other 

postretirement benefit plans of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Company Gas that had not 

yet been recognized in net periodic other postretirement benefit cost.

Balance at December 31, 2018

Regulatory assets:
Prior service cost
Net (gain) loss
Regulatory amortization(*)

Total regulatory assets (liabilities)

Balance at December 31, 2017

Regulatory assets:
Prior service cost
Net (gain) loss
Regulatory amortization(*)

Total regulatory assets

Southern  
Company(*)

Alabama  
Power

Georgia 
Power

(in millions)

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Company 
Gas

$ 14
8
—
$ 22

$ 21
320
—
$341

$ 8
(16)
—
$ (8)

$ 11
45
—
$ 56

$ 4
56
—
$ 60

$ 5
197
—
$202

$ —
4
—
$ 4

$ —
17
—
$17

$ 2
(43)
37
$ (4)

$ (7)
47
6
$ 46

(*)  Amounts for Southern Company exclude regulatory assets of $57 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas’ other 

postretirement benefit plans prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.

The changes in the balance of net regulatory assets (liabilities) related to the other postretirement benefit plans for the plan years ended 

December 31, 2018 and 2017 are presented in the following table:

Southern  
Company(*)

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

(in millions)

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Company 
Gas

Net regulatory assets (liabilities):
Balance at December 31, 2016
Net (gain) loss
Change in prior service costs
Reclassification adjustments:

Amortization of prior service costs
Amortization of net gain (loss)
Total reclassification adjustments
Total change
Balance at December 31, 2017
Net (gain) loss
Change in prior service costs
Reclassification adjustments:

Amortization of prior service costs
Amortization of net gain (loss)
Amortization of regulatory assets

Total reclassification adjustments
Total change
Balance at December 31, 2018

$ 378
(21)
3

(6)
(13)
(19)
(37)
$ 341
(298)
—

(7)
(14)
—
(21)
(319)
$ 22

$ 76
(15)
—

(4)
(1)
(5)
(20)
$ 56
(60)
—

(4)
(1)
—
(5)
(65)
$ (9)

$ 213
(2)
—

(1)
(8)
(9)
(11)
$ 202
(132)
—

(1)
(9)
—
(10)
(142)
$ 60

$ 19
(1)
—

—
(1)
(1)
(2)
$ 17
(12)
—

—
(1)
—
(1)
(13)
$ 4

(*)  Amounts for Southern Company exclude regulatory assets of $57 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas’ other 

postretirement benefit plans prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.

$ 52
(5)
—

3
(4)
(1)
(6)
$ 46
(42)
(2)

—
—
(6)
(6)
(50)
$ (4)

179

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Presented below are the amounts included in AOCI at December 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the other postretirement benefit plans of 

Southern Company, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas that had not yet been recognized in net periodic other postretirement 

benefit cost.

Balance at December 31, 2018

AOCI:

Prior service cost
Net (gain) loss

Total AOCI

Balance at December 31, 2017

AOCI:

Prior service cost
Net (gain) loss

Total AOCI

Southern 
Company

Southern
Power
(in millions)

Southern  
Company
Gas

$ 1
(5)
$(4)

$—
4
$ 4

$—
1
$ 1

$—
3
$ 3

$ 1
(5)
$(4)

$—
(3)
$ (3)

The components of OCI related to the other postretirement benefit plans for the plan years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are 

presented in the following table:

AOCI:
Balance at December 31, 2016
Net (gain) loss
Change from employee transfer
Total change
Balance at December 31, 2017
Net (gain) loss
Amortization of prior service costs
Total change
Balance at December 31, 2018

Southern  
Company

Southern
Power
(in millions)

$ 7
(3)
—
(3)
$ 4
(8)
—
(8)
$ (4)

$—
—
3
3
$ 3
(2)
—
(2)
$ 1

Southern  
Company  
Gas

$ (3)
(1)
1
—
$ (3)
(2)
1
(1)
$ (4)

Components of the other postretirement benefit plans’ net periodic cost for Southern Company, the traditional electric operating 

companies, and Southern Power were as follows:

Southern  
Company

Alabama  
Power

Georgia 
Power
(in millions)

Mississippi  
Power

Southern  
Power

2018:
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Net amortization
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost

2017:
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Net amortization
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost

2016:
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Net amortization
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost

180

$ 1
—
—
—
$ 1

$ 24
75
(69)
21
$ 51

$ 24
79
(66)
20
$ 57

$ 22
76
(60)
21
$ 59

$ 6
17
(26)
5
$ 2

$ 6
17
(25)
5
$ 3

$ 5
18
(25)
6
$ 4

$ 6
28
(25)
10
$ 19

$ 7
29
(25)
9
$ 20

$ 6
30
(22)
10
$ 24

$ 1
3
(2)
1
$ 3

$ 1
3
(1)
1
$ 4

$ 1
3
(1)
1
$ 4

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Components of the other postretirement benefit plans’ net periodic cost for Southern Company Gas were as follows:

Year Ended 
December 31, 
2018

Successor

Year Ended 
December 31, 
2017

(in millions)

July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016

Predecessor

January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016

(in millions)

Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization:

Regulatory assets
Prior service costs
Net (gain)/loss

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost

$ 2
10
(7)

6
—
—
$11

$ 2
10
(7)

—
(3)
4
$ 6

$ 1
5
(3)

2
—
—
$ 5

$ 1
5
(3)

—
(1)
2
$ 4

The registrants’ future benefit payments, including prescription drug benefits, reflect expected future service and are estimated based 

on assumptions used to measure the APBO for the other postretirement benefit plans. The registrants’ estimated benefit payments are 

reduced by drug subsidy receipts expected as a result of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 

as follows:

Benefit payments:
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024 to 2028

Subsidy receipts:
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024 to 2028

Total:
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024 to 2028

Southern  
Company

Alabama  
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi  
Power

Southern  
Power

(in millions)

Southern  
Company  
Gas

$136
136
136
137
137
669

$ (7)
(7)
(8)
(8)
(8)
(41)

$129
129
128
129
129
628

$ 28
28
29
29
29
146

$ (2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(3)
(13)

$ 26
26
27
27
26
133

$ 51
50
50
50
49
243

$ (3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(4)
(18)

$ 48
47
47
47
45
225

$ 6
6
6
6
7
30

$ —
—
—
(1)
(1)
(2)

$ 6
6
6
5
6
28

$—
—
—
1
1
3

$—
—
—
—
—
—

$—
—
—
1
1
3

$18
18
19
19
19
90

$ —
—
—
—
—
—

$18
18
19
19
19
90

181

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

Benefit Plan Assets
Pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets are managed and invested in accordance with all applicable requirements, 

including ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. The registrants’ investment policies for both the pension plans and the other 

postretirement benefit plans cover a diversified mix of assets as described below. Derivative instruments may be used to gain efficient 

exposure to the various asset classes and as hedging tools. Additionally, the registrants minimize the risk of large losses primarily through 

diversification but also monitor and manage other aspects of risk.

The investment strategy for plan assets related to the Southern Company system’s qualified pension plan is to be broadly diversified 

across major asset classes. The asset allocation is established after consideration of various factors that affect the assets and liabilities of 

the pension plan including, but not limited to, historical and expected returns and interest rates, volatility, correlations of asset classes, 

the current level of assets and liabilities, and the assumed growth in assets and liabilities. Because a significant portion of the liability of 

the pension plans is long-term in nature, the assets are invested consistent with long-term investment expectations for return and risk. To 

manage the actual asset class exposures relative to the target asset allocation, the Southern Company system employs a formal rebalancing 

program. As additional risk management, external investment managers and service providers are subject to written guidelines to ensure 

appropriate and prudent investment practices. Management believes the portfolio is well-diversified with no significant concentrations 

of risk.

Investment Strategies and Benefit Plan Asset Fair Values
A description of the major asset classes that the pension and other postretirement benefit plans are comprised of, along with the valuation 

methods used for fair value measurement, is provided below:

Description

Valuation Methodology

Domestic equity: A mix of large and small capitalization stocks 
with generally an equal distribution of value and growth attributes, 

Domestic and international equities such as common stocks, 

American depositary receipts, and real estate investment trusts that 

managed both actively and through passive index approaches.

trade on public exchanges are classified as Level 1 investments and 

International equity: A mix of growth stocks and value stocks 
with both developed and emerging market exposure, managed 

both actively and through passive index approaches.

are valued at the closing price in the active market. Equity funds 

with unpublished prices are valued as Level 2 when the underlying 

holdings are comprised of Level 1 or Level 2 equity securities.

Fixed income: A mix of domestic and international bonds.

Investments in fixed income securities are generally classified as 

Trust-owned life insurance (TOLI): Investments of taxable trusts 
aimed at minimizing the impact of taxes on the portfolio.

Level 2 investments and are valued based on prices reported in 

the market place. Additionally, the value of fixed income securities 

takes into consideration certain items such as broker quotes, 

spreads, yield curves, interest rates, and discount rates that apply 

to the term of a specific instrument.

Investments in TOLI policies are classified as Level 2 investments 

and are valued based on the underlying investments held in the 

policy’s separate accounts. The underlying assets are equity and 

fixed income pooled funds that are comprised of Level 1 and 

Level 2 securities.

Special situations: Investments in opportunistic strategies with 
the objective of diversifying and enhancing returns and exploiting 

Investments in real estate, private equity, and special situations 

are generally classified as Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient, 

short-term inefficiencies, as well as investments in promising new 

since the underlying assets typically do not have publicly available 

strategies of a longer-term nature.

Real estate: Investments in traditional private market, equity-
oriented investments in real properties (indirectly through pooled 

funds or partnerships) and in publicly traded real estate securities.

observable inputs. The fund manager values the assets using 

various inputs and techniques depending on the nature of the 

underlying investments. Techniques may include purchase multiples 

for comparable transactions, comparable public company trading 

multiples, discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing market 

Private equity: Investments in private partnerships that invest in 
private or public securities typically through privately-negotiated 

capitalization rates, recent sales of comparable investments, and 

independent third-party appraisals. The fair value of partnerships 

and/or structured transactions, including leveraged buyouts, 

is determined by aggregating the value of the underlying assets 

venture capital, and distressed debt.

less liabilities.

182

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

The fair values, and actual allocations relative to the target allocations, of the Southern Company system’s pension plans at December 31, 2018 

and 2017 are presented below. The fair values presented are prepared in accordance with GAAP. For purposes of determining the fair value 

of the pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets and the appropriate level designation, management relies on information 

provided by the plan’s trustee. This information is reviewed and evaluated by management with changes made to the trustee information as 

appropriate. The registrants did not have any investments classified as Level 3 at December 31, 2018 or 2017.

These fair values exclude cash, receivables related to investment income and pending investment sales, and payables related to pending 

investment purchases.

At December 31, 2018:

Southern Company
Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Alabama Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Georgia Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets for  
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Net Asset  
Value as a  
Practical 
Expedient
(NAV)

(in millions)

Total

Target  
Allocation

Actual  
Allocation

$2,102
1,344

—
—
—
—
270
419
—
—
$4,135

$ 466
298

—
—
—
—
60
93
—
—
$ 917

$ 663
424

—
—
—
—
85
132
—
—
$1,304

$1,030
1,325

930
7
1,195
654
2
—
—
—
$5,143

$ 228
293

206
2
265
145
1
—
—
—
$1,140

$ 325
418

294
2
377
206
1
—
—
—
$1,623

$ — $ 3,132
2,669

—

—
—
—
—
—
1,361
171
821
$2,353

930
7
1,195
654
272
1,780
171
821
$11,631

$ — $
—

694
591

—
—
—
—
—
302
38
182
$ 522

206
2
265
145
61
395
38
182
$ 2,579

$ — $
—

988
842

—
—
—
—
—
429
54
259
$ 742

294
2
377
206
86
561
54
259
$ 3,669

26%
25
23

28%
25
24

14
3
9
100%

26%
25
23

14
3
9
100%

26%
25
23

14
3
9
100%

15
1
7
100%

28%
25
24

15
1
7
100%

28%
25
24

15
1
7
100%

183

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

At December 31, 2018:

Mississippi Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Southern Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Southern Company Gas
Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets for  
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Net Asset  
Value as a  
Practical 
Expedient
(NAV)

(in millions)

Total

Target  
Allocation

Actual  
Allocation

$

91
59

—
—
—
12
18
—
—
$ 180

$

$

22
14

—
—
—
3
4
—
—
43

$ 145
92

—
—
—
19
29
—
—
$ 285

$

45
59

40
52
28
—
—
—
—
$ 224

$

$

$

11
14

10
13
7
—
—
—
—
55

71
91

64
82
45
—
—
—
—
$ 353

$ — $
—

—
—
—
—
59
7
36
$ 102

$

$ — $
—

—
—
—
—
15
2
9
26

$

$

$ — $
—

—
—
—
—
94
12
56
$ 162

$

136
118

40
52
28
12
77
7
36
506

33
28

10
13
7
3
19
2
9
124

216
183

64
82
45
19
123
12
56
800

26%
25
23

14
3
9
100%

26%
25
23

14
3
9
100%

26%
25
23

14
3
9
100%

28%
25
24

15
1
7
100%

28%
25
24

15
1
7
100%

28%
25
24

15
1
7
100%

(*)  Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

184

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

At December 31, 2017:

Southern Company(a)
Assets:

Domestic equity(b)
International equity(b)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Alabama Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(b)
International equity(b)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Georgia Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(b)
International equity(b)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets for 
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Net Asset 
Value as a 
Practical 
Expedient
(NAV)

(in millions)

Total

Target 
Allocation

Actual 
Allocation

$2,559
1,555

—
—
—
—
301
472
—
—
$4,887

$ 572
370

—
—
—
—
51
111
—
—
$1,104

$ 819
529

—
—
—
—
74
160
—
—
$1,582

$1,482
1,569

926
8
1,241
650
36
—
—
—
$5,912

$ 276
333

200
2
286
155
3
—
—
—
$1,255

$ 394
477

286
3
409
221
4
—
—
—
$1,794

$ — $ 4,041
3,124

—

—
—
—
—
48
1,204
180
670
$2,102

926
8
1,241
650
385
1,676
180
670
$12,901

$ — $
—

848
703

—
—
—
—
—
283
43
159
$ 485

200
2
286
155
54
394
43
159
$ 2,844

$ — $ 1,213
1,006

—

—
—
—
—
—
404
61
228
$ 693

286
3
409
221
78
564
61
228
$ 4,069

26%
25
23

31%
25
24

14
3
9
100%

13
1
6
100%

26%
25
23

31%
25
24

14
3
9
100%

13
1
6
100%

26%
25
23

31%
25
24

14
3
9
100%

13
1
6
100%

185

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

At December 31, 2017:
Mississippi Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(b)
International equity(b)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Southern Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(b)
International equity(b)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets for 
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Net Asset 
Value as a 
Practical 
Expedient
(NAV)

Total

Target 
Allocation

Actual 
Allocation

$ 113
73

—
—
—
10
22
—
—
$ 218

$

$

28
18

—
—
—
2
5
—
—
53

$

55
66

40
56
31
1
—
—
—
$ 249

$

$

13
16

10
14
8
—
—
—
—
61

$ — $
—

—
—
—
—
56
9
32
97

$

$

$ — $
—

—
—
—
—
14
2
8
24

$

$

168
139

40
56
31
11
78
9
32
564

41
34

10
14
8
2
19
2
8
138

26%
25
23

31%
25
24

14
3
9
100%

13
1
6
100%

26%
25
23

31%
25
24

14
3
9
100%

13
1
6
100%

(a)  Target and actual allocations reflect the asset allocations for only the Southern Company system pension plan prior to its merger with the 

Southern Company Gas pension plan on January 1, 2018.

(b)  Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

The fair values of Southern Company Gas’ pension plan assets for the period ended December 31, 2017 are presented below. The fair 

value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, and payables related to pending 

investment purchases. Special situations (absolute return and hedge funds) investment assets are presented in the tables below based on 

the nature of the investment.

At December 31, 2017:

Southern Company Gas
Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Private equity
Total

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets for 
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant 
Other 
Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)

(in millions)

Net Asset  
Value as a  
Practical  
Expedient
(NAV)

$155
—

—
—
84
3
—
$242

$323
166

85
39
25
—
—
$638

$ —
—

—
—
48
16
1
$65

Total

$478
166

85
39
157
19
1
$945

(*)  Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

186

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

The composition of Southern Company Gas’ pension plan assets at December 31, 2017, along with the targets, is presented below:

Pension plan assets:
Equity
Fixed Income
Cash
Other
Balance at end of period

Target

2017

53%
15
2
30
100%

65%
19
6
10
100%

The fair values of the applicable registrants’ other postretirement benefit plan assets at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are presented below. 

The registrants did not have any investments classified as Level 3 at December 31, 2018 or 2017. These fair value measurements exclude 

cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases.

At December 31, 2018:

Southern Company
Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Trust-owned life insurance
Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Alabama Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Trust-owned life insurance
Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets for  
Identical Assets 
(Level 1)

Significant 
Other 
Observable 
Inputs  
(Level 2)

Net Asset  
Value as a  
Practical  
Expedient  
(NAV)

(in millions)

Total

Target  
Allocation

Actual  
Allocation

$100
45

—
—
—
13
—
13
—
—
$171

$ 35
12

—
—
—
3
—
4
—
—
$ 54

$ 76
75

34
35
81
—
386
—
—
—
$687

$ 10
12

10
11
6
—
233
—
—
—
$282

$ —
—

—
—
—
—
—
40
4
24
$ 68

$ —
—

—
—
—
—
—
13
2
8
$ 23

$176
120

34
35
81
13
386
53
4
24
$926

$ 45
24

10
11
6
3
233
17
2
8
$359

39%
23
29

40%
22
30

5
1
3
100%

43%
21
28

4
1
3
100%

5
—
3
100%

45%
21
28

4
—
2
100%

187

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements

At December 31, 2018:

Georgia Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Trust-owned life insurance
Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Mississippi Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Southern Company Gas
Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets for  
Identical Assets 
(Level 1)

Significant 
Other 
Observable 
Inputs  
(Level 2)

Net Asset  
Value as a  
Practical  
Expedient  
(NAV)

(in millions)

Total

Target  
Allocation

Actual  
Allocation

$ 41
17

—
—
—
5
—
4
—
—
$ 67

$

$

$

$

3
2

—
—
—
1
1
—
—
7

2
1

—
—
—
1
—
—
—
4

$

9
32

7
10
44
—
153
—
—
—
$255

$

2
2

6
2
1
—
—
—
—
$ 13

$ 47
17

1
1
24
—
—
—
—
$ 90

$ —
—

—
—
—
—
—
11
2
7
$ 20

$ —
—

—
—
—
—
2
—
1
$ 3

$ —
—

—
—
—
—
1
—
1
$ 2

$ 50
49

7
10
44
5
153
15
2
7
$342

$

5
4

6
2
1
1
3
—
1
$ 23

$ 49
18

1
1
24
1
1
—
1
$ 96

36%
24
33

35%
24
35

4
1
2
100%

21%
20
38

11
3
7
100%

51%
20
25

2
1
1
100%

4
—
2
100%

22%
20
39

12
1
6
100%

51%
18
28

2
—
1
100%

(*)  Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

188

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

At December 31, 2017:

Southern Company(a)
Assets:

Domestic equity(b)
International equity(b)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Trust-owned life insurance
Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Alabama Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(b)
International equity(b)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Trust-owned life insurance
Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Georgia Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(b)
International equity(b)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Trust-owned life insurance
Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets for  
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Net Asset  
Value as a  
Practical 
Expedient
(NAV)

(in millions)

Total

Target  
Allocation

Actual  
Allocation

$135
47

—
—
—
12
—
16
—
—
$210

$ 52
16

—
—
—
2
—
5
—
—
$ 75

$ 53
14

—
—
—
4
—
6
—
—
$ 77

$104
98

32
37
79
—
426
—
—
—
$776

$ 12
14

11
12
7
—
253
—
—
—
$309

$ 11
46

6
11
41
—
173
—
—
—
$288

$ —
—

—
—
—
1
—
36
5
20
$62

$ —
—

—
—
—
—
—
12
2
7
$21

$ —
—

—
—
—
—
—
11
2
6
$19

$ 239
145

32
37
79
13
426
52
5
20
$1,048

$

64
30

11
12
7
2
253
17
2
7
$ 405

$

64
60

6
11
41
4
173
17
2
6
$ 384

37%
23
30

40%
23
29

5
1
4
100%

42%
22
28

4
1
3
100%

36%
24
33

4
1
2
100%

5
1
2
100%

44%
22
28

4
—
2
100%

38%
24
31

4
1
2
100%

189

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

At December 31, 2017:

Mississippi Power
Assets:

Domestic equity(b)
International equity(b)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
Corporate bonds
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments
Special situations
Private equity
Total

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets for  
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Net Asset  
Value as a  
Practical 
Expedient
(NAV)

(in millions)

Total

Target  
Allocation

Actual  
Allocation

$

$

4
3

—
—
—
1
1
—
—
9

$

2
2

5
2
1
—
—
—
—
$ 12

$ —
—

—
—
—
—
2
—
1
$ 3

$

$

6
5

5
2
1
1
3
—
1
24

21%
21
37

12
2
7
100%

25%
20
38

11
1
5
100%

(a)  Target and actual allocations reflect the asset allocations for only the Southern Company other postretirement benefit plans prior to the merger of the 

plans with the Southern Company Gas other postretirement benefit plans on January 1, 2018.
(b)  Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

The fair values of Southern Company Gas’ other postretirement benefit plan assets for the period ended December 31, 2017 are presented 

below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, and payables 

related to pending investment purchases. Special situations (absolute return and hedge funds) investment assets are presented in the 

tables below based on the nature of the investment.

At December 31, 2017:

Southern Company Gas
Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:
Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Total

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for 
Identical 
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant 
Other  
Observable  
Inputs
(Level 2)

(in millions)

Net Asset 
Value as a 
Practical 
Expedient
(NAV)

$ 3
—

—
2
$ 5

$ 69
22

24
—
$115

$—
—

—
1
$ 1

Total

$ 72
22

24
3
$121

(*)  Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

The composition of Southern Company Gas’ other postretirement benefit plan assets at December 31, 2017, along with the targets, is 

presented below:

Other postretirement benefit plan assets:
Equity
Fixed Income
Cash
Other
Total

190

Target

2017

72%
24
1
3
100%

76%
20
2
2
100%

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

Employee Savings Plan
Southern Company and its subsidiaries also sponsor 401(k) defined contribution plans covering substantially all employees and provide 

matching contributions up to specified percentages of an employee’s eligible pay. Total matching contributions made to the plans for 2018, 

2017, and 2016 were as follows:

2018
2017
2016

Southern 
Company

Alabama
Power

$119
118
105

$24
23
23

Georgia
Power

(in millions)

$26
26
27

Successor – 2018
Successor – 2017
Successor – July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Predecessor – January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016

NOTE 12. STOCK COMPENSATION

Mississippi
Power

Southern
Power

$5
5
5

$ 3
N/A
N/A

Company Southern Gas

(in millions)

$18
19
8
12

Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation primarily in the form of Southern Company performance share units (PSU) and restricted stock units (RSU) 

may be granted through the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan to a large segment of Southern Company system employees ranging 

from line management to executives. Southern Company Gas and Southern Power had no employee participants in the stock-based 

compensation plans until 2017 and 2018, respectively. In conjunction with the Merger, stock-based compensation in the form of Southern 

Company RSUs and PSUs was granted to certain executives of Southern Company Gas through the Southern Company Omnibus Incentive 

Compensation Plan.

At December 31, 2018, the number of current and former employees participating in stock-based compensation programs for the 

registrants was as follows:

Number of employees

Southern 
Company

4,716

Alabama 
Power

745

Georgia 
Power

822

Mississippi 
Power

164

Southern 
Power

95

Southern 
Company 
Gas

285

Employees become immediately vested in PSUs and RSUs upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are 

retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately, while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible 

during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility. In addition, the registrants 

recognize forfeitures as they occur.

All unvested PSUs and RSUs vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation.

Performance Share Units
PSUs granted to employees vest at the end of a three-year performance period. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered 

to employees at the end of the performance period with the number of shares issued ranging from 0% to 200% of the target number of 

PSUs granted, based on achievement of the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Southern Company 

Board of Directors.

Southern Company has issued three types of PSUs, each with a unique performance goal. These types of PSUs include total shareholder 

return (TSR) awards based on the TSR for Southern Company common stock during the three-year performance period as compared to a 

group of industry peers; ROE awards based on Southern Company’s equity-weighted return over the performance period; and EPS awards 

based on Southern Company’s cumulative EPS over the performance period. EPS awards were not granted in 2018.

191

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

The fair value of TSR awards is determined as of the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern 

Company’s common stock among industry peers over the performance period. In determining the fair value of the TSR awards issued to 

employees, the expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of Southern Company’s stock over a period equal to the performance 

period. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant that covers the performance period of 

the awards. The following table shows the assumptions used in the pricing model and the weighted average grant-date fair value of TSR 

awards granted:

Year Ended December 31
Expected volatility
Expected term (in years)
Interest rate
Weighted average grant-date fair value

2018
14.9%
3
2.4%

2017
15.6%
3
1.4%

2016
15.0%
3
0.8%

$43.75

$49.08

$45.06

The registrants recognize TSR award compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the three-year performance period 

without remeasurement.

The fair values of EPS awards and ROE awards are based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the 

grant. The weighted average grant-date fair value of the awards granted during 2018, 2017, and 2016 was $43.49, $49.21, and $48.87, 

respectively. Compensation expense for EPS and ROE awards is generally recognized ratably over the three-year performance period 

adjusted for expected changes in EPS and ROE performance. Total compensation cost recognized for vested EPS awards and ROE awards 

reflects final performance metrics.

Southern Company’s total unvested PSUs outstanding at December 31, 2017 was 2.9 million. In February 2018, 1.5 million PSUs vested 

for the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2017 were converted into 1.9 million shares outstanding at a share price 

of $44.68.

During 2018, Southern Company granted 1.3 million PSUs and 1.9 million PSUs were vested or forfeited, resulting in 2.5 million 

unvested PSUs outstanding at December 31, 2018. In February 2019, the PSUs that vested for the three-year performance period ended 

December 31, 2018 were converted into 1.7 million shares outstanding at a share price of $49.24.

Total PSU compensation cost, and the related tax benefit recognized in income, for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 

are as follows:

Southern Company

Compensation cost recognized in income
Tax benefit of compensation cost recognized in income

Alabama Power

Compensation cost recognized in income
Tax benefit of compensation cost recognized in income

Georgia Power

Compensation cost recognized in income
Tax benefit of compensation cost recognized in income

Mississippi Power

Compensation cost recognized in income
Tax benefit of compensation cost recognized in income

Southern Power

Compensation cost recognized in income
Tax benefit of compensation cost recognized in income

Southern Company Gas

Compensation cost recognized in income
Tax benefit of compensation cost recognized in income

2018

2017
(in millions)

2016

$91
24

$11
3

$11
3

$ 3
1

$ 4
1

$11
3

$74
29

$ 9
4

$10
4

$ 2
1

N/A
N/A

$ 8
3

$96
37

$15
6

$15
6

$ 4
1

N/A
N/A

N/A
N/A

The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company PSUs to the employees of the traditional electric operating companies, 

Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas is recognized in each respective registrant’s financial statements with a corresponding credit 

to equity representing a capital contribution from Southern Company.

192

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

At December 31, 2018, Southern Company’s total unrecognized compensation cost related to PSUs was $30 million and is expected to be 

recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 16 months. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to PSUs as of 

December 31, 2018 was immaterial for all other registrants.

Restricted Stock Units
Beginning in 2017, employees are granted RSUs in addition to PSUs. One-third of the RSUs granted to employees vest each year 

throughout a three-year service period. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of each 

vesting period.

The fair value of RSUs is based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. The weighted 

average grant-date fair values of RSUs granted during 2018 and 2017 were $43.81 and $49.25, respectively. Since one-third of the RSUs 

vest each year throughout a three-year service period, compensation cost for RSUs is generally recognized over the corresponding one-, 

two-, or three-year vesting period.

Southern Company had 0.7 million RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2017. During 2018, Southern Company granted 0.7 million RSUs and 

0.3 million RSUs were vested or forfeited, resulting in 1.1 million unvested RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2018, including RSUs related 

to employee retention agreements.

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, Southern Company’s total compensation cost for RSUs recognized in income was 

$27 million and $25 million, respectively. The related tax benefit also recognized in income was $7 million and $10 million for the years 

ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs as of December 31, 2018 for 

Southern Company of $13 million will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 16 months.

Total RSUs outstanding and total compensation cost and related tax benefit for the RSUs recognized in income for the years ended 

December 31, 2018 and 2017, as well as the total unrecognized compensation cost as of December 31, 2018, were immaterial for all 

other registrants.

Stock Options
In 2015, Southern Company discontinued granting stock options. Stock options expire no later than 10 years after the grant date and the 

latest possible exercise will occur no later than November 2024. As of December 31, 2018, the weighted average remaining contractual 

term for the options outstanding and exercisable was approximately 4 years.

As of December 31, 2017, all stock option awards are vested and compensation cost fully recognized. Total compensation cost for stock 

option awards and the related tax benefits recognized in income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were immaterial for 

Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power.

Southern Company’s activity in the stock option program for 2018 is summarized below:

Outstanding at December 31, 2017
Exercised
Outstanding and Exercisable at December 31, 2018

Shares Subject 
to Option

(in millions)

18.6
1.1
17.5

Weighted Average 
Exercise Price

$41.68
37.82
$41.92

Southern Company’s cash receipts from issuances related to stock options exercised under the share-based payment arrangements for the 

years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were $41 million, $239 million, and $448 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2018, the aggregate intrinsic value for the options outstanding and exercisable was as follows:

Total intrinsic value for outstanding and exercisable options

$39

$5

$13

$1

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

(in millions)

193

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

Total intrinsic value of options exercised, and the related tax benefit, for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 are 

presented below:

Year Ended December 31

Southern Company

Intrinsic value of options exercised
Tax benefit of options exercised

Alabama Power

Intrinsic value of options exercised
Tax benefit of options exercised

Georgia Power

Intrinsic value of options exercised
Tax benefit of options exercised

Mississippi Power

Intrinsic value of options exercised
Tax benefit of options exercised

2018

2017
(in millions)

$ 9
2

$ 2
—

$ 2
—

$ 1
—

$64
25

$12
5

$13
5

$ 2
1

2016

$120
46

$ 21
8

$ 18
7

$

4
2

Merger Stock Compensation
At the effective time of the Merger, each share of Southern Company Gas common stock, other than certain excluded shares, was 

converted into the right to receive $66 in cash, without interest. Also, at the effective time of the Merger:

 O  Southern Company Gas’ outstanding RSUs, restricted stock awards, and non-employee director stock awards were deemed fully vested 

and were canceled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the total number of shares of 

Southern Company Gas’ common stock subject to such award and (ii) the Merger consideration of $66 per share;

 O  Southern Company Gas’ outstanding stock options, all of which were fully vested, were canceled and converted into the right to receive 

an amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the total number of shares of Southern Company Gas’ common stock subject to such 

options and (ii) the excess of the Merger consideration of $66 per share over the applicable exercise price per share of such options; and

 O  each outstanding award of a Southern Company Gas PSU was converted into an award of Southern Company RSUs. The conversion 

ratio was the product of (i) the greater of (a) 125% of the number of units underlying such award based on target level achievement 

of all relevant performance goals and (b) the number of units underlying such award based on the actual level of achievement of all 

relevant performance goals against target and (ii) an exchange ratio based on the Merger consideration of $66 per share as compared to 

the volume-weighted average price per share of Southern Company common stock.

Southern Company Restricted Stock Awards
At the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding award of existing Southern Company Gas PSUs was converted into an award of 
Southern Company RSUs. Under the terms of the restricted stock awards, the employees received Southern Company stock when they 
satisfy the requisite service period by being continuously employed through the original three-year vesting schedule of the award being 
replaced. Southern Company issued 0.7 million RSUs with a grant-date fair value of $53.83, based on the closing stock price of Southern 
Company common stock on the date of the grant. As a portion of the fair value of the award related to pre-combination service, the 
grant date fair value was allocated to pre- or post-combination service and accounted for as Merger consideration or compensation 
cost, respectively. Approximately $13 million of the grant date fair value was allocated to Merger consideration. Southern Company 
Gas recognized the remaining fair value as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining vesting period. As of 
December 31, 2018, all RSUs are vested and compensation cost is fully recognized.

For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, total compensation cost for RSUs recognized in income was $2 million, 
$8 million, and $13 million, respectively, with the related tax benefit of $1 million, $4 million, and $4 million, respectively, also recognized 
in income. The compensation cost related to the grant of RSUs to Southern Company Gas employees is recognized in Southern Company 
Gas’ financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company.

Southern Company Gas Change in Control Awards
Southern Company awarded PSUs to certain Southern Company Gas employees who continued their employment with the Southern 
Company in lieu of certain change in control benefits the employee was entitled to receive following the Merger (change in control 
awards). Shares of Southern Company common stock and/or cash equal to the dollar value of the change in control benefit will vest and 
be issued one-third each year as long as the employee remains in service with Southern Company or its subsidiaries at each vest date. In 
addition to the change in control benefit, Southern Company common stock could be issued to the employees at the end of a performance 
period based on achievement of certain Southern Company common stock price metrics, as well performance goals established by the 
Compensation Committee of the Southern Company Board of Directors (achievement shares).

194

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

The change in control benefits are accounted for as a liability award with the fair value equal to the guaranteed dollar value of the change 

in control benefit. The compensation cost of the change in control benefit is recognized in Southern Company Gas’ financial statements 

with a corresponding credit to a liability. The grant-date fair value of the achievement portion of the award was determined using a Monte 

Carlo simulation model to estimate the number of achievement shares expected to vest based on the Southern Company common stock 

price. The compensation cost of the achievement shares is recognized in Southern Company Gas’ financial statements with a corresponding 

credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. The expected payout is reevaluated annually with expense 

recognized to date increased or decreased proportionately based on the expected performance. The compensation cost ultimately 

recognized for the achievement shares will be based on the actual performance.

For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, total compensation cost for the change in control awards recognized in income 

was $5 million, $12 million, and $4 million, respectively, with the related tax benefit of $2 million, $6 million, and less than $1 million, 

respectively, also recognized in income. As of December 31, 2018, $2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to change in 

control awards will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately six months.

Predecessor

For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, the employees of Southern Company Gas and subsidiaries 

participated in the AGL Resources Inc. Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.

The AGL Resources Inc. Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, and the Long-Term Incentive Plan (1999) provided 

for the grant of incentive and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, shares of restricted stock, RSUs, performance cash 

awards, and other stock-based awards to officers and key employees. Effective July 1, 2016, all Southern Company Gas shares of stock 

were canceled and/or converted as a result of the Merger. No further grants will be made from the Long-Term Incentive Plan (1999) or the 

AGL Resources Inc. Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.

For the predecessor period, Southern Company Gas recognized stock-based compensation cost for its stock-based awards over the requisite 

service period based on the estimated fair value at the date of grant for its stock-based awards using the modified prospective method.

Performance-based stock awards and performance units contained market and performance conditions. Stock options, restricted stock 

awards, and performance units also contained a service condition. Southern Company Gas estimated forfeitures over the requisite service 

period when recognizing compensation cost. These estimates were adjusted to the extent that actual forfeitures differ, or were expected 

to materially differ, from such estimates. The difference between the proceeds from the exercise of Southern Company Gas’ stock-based 

awards and the par value of the stock was recorded within additional paid-in capital.

Southern Company Gas granted stock awards with a grant price that was equal to the fair market value on the date of the grant. Fair 

market value was defined under the terms of the applicable plans as the closing price per share of Southern Company Gas’ common stock 

on the grant date. For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, total compensation cost for cash and stock-based 

awards recognized in income was $24 million with related tax benefits of an immaterial amount also recognized in income.

NOTE 13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value measurements are based on inputs of observable and unobservable market data that a market participant would use in pricing 

the asset or liability. The use of observable inputs is maximized where available and the use of unobservable inputs is minimized for 

fair value measurement and reflects a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used for fair value 

measurement.

 O Level 1 consists of observable market data in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.

 O Level 2 consists of observable market data, other than that included in Level 1, that is either directly or indirectly observable.

 O Level 3 consists of unobservable market data. The input may reflect the assumptions of each registrant of what a market participant 

would use in pricing an asset or liability. If there is little available market data, then each registrant’s own assumptions are the best 

available information.

In the case of multiple inputs being used in a fair value measurement, the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value 

measurement represents the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurement is reported.

195

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

At December 31, 2018, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated 

level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets for  
Identical 
Assets 
(Level 1)

Significant  
Other 
Observable 
Inputs 
(Level 2)

Significant  
Unobservable  
Inputs 
(Level 3)

(in millions)

Net Asset 
Value as a  
Practical  
Expedient
(NAV)

Total

$ 469
—

601
53
—
—
—
24
—
—
16
34
765
—
$1,962

$ 648
—
—
—
$ 648

$ 292
75

107
173
261
83
14
290
68
—
—
4
1
12
$1,380

$ 316
49
23
—
$ 388

$ —

$

6

396
53
—
—
24
—
—
6
116
—
$ 595

95
50
18
1
135
23
—
—
1
12
$ 341

$ —

$

10

$ —
—

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ —

$ —
—
—
21
$21

$ —

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ —

$ —

$ — $ 761
75

—

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
45
—
—
—
—
$45

708
226
261
83
14
314
68
45
16
38
766
12
$3,387

$ — $ 964
49
23
21
$ — $1,057

—
—
—

$ — $

6

—
—
—
—
—
—
45
—
—
—
$45

491
103
18
1
159
23
45
6
117
12
$ 981

$ — $

10

At December 31, 2018:

Southern Company
Assets:

Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
Foreign currency derivatives
Investments in trusts:(c)(d)

Domestic equity
Foreign equity
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
Municipal bonds
Pooled funds – fixed income
Corporate bonds
Mortgage and asset backed securities
Private equity
Cash and cash equivalents
Other

Cash equivalents
Other investments
Total
Liabilities:

Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
Interest rate derivatives
Foreign currency derivatives
Contingent consideration
Total

Alabama Power
Assets:

Energy-related derivatives
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(c)

Domestic equity
Foreign equity
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
Municipal bonds
Corporate bonds
Mortgage and asset backed securities
Private equity
Other

Cash equivalents
Other investments
Total
Liabilities:

Energy-related derivatives

196

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

At December 31, 2018:

Georgia Power
Assets:

Energy-related derivatives
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(c)(d)

Domestic equity
Foreign equity
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
Municipal bonds
Corporate bonds
Mortgage and asset backed securities
Other

Total
Liabilities:

Energy-related derivatives
Interest rate derivatives
Total

Mississippi Power
Assets:

Energy-related derivatives
Cash equivalents
Total
Liabilities:

Energy-related derivatives

Southern Power
Assets:

Energy-related derivatives
Foreign currency derivatives
Cash equivalents
Total
Liabilities:

Energy-related derivatives
Foreign currency derivatives
Contingent consideration
Total

Southern Company Gas
Assets:

Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
Non-qualified deferred compensation trusts:

Domestic equity
Foreign equity
Pooled funds - fixed income
Cash equivalents

Cash equivalents
Total
Liabilities:

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets for  
Identical 
Assets 
(Level 1)

Significant  
Other 
Observable 
Inputs 
(Level 2)

Significant  
Unobservable  
Inputs 
(Level 3)

(in millions)

Net Asset 
Value as a  
Practical  
Expedient
(NAV)

Total

$ —

$

6

205
—
—
—
—
—
19
$ 224

$ —
—
$ —

$ —
255
$ 255

$ —

$ —
—
46
46

$

$ —
—
—
$ —

1
119
243
82
155
45
4
$ 655

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

21
2
23

3
—
3

9

4
75
—
79

8
23
—
31

$ 469

$ 272

—
—
—
4
40
$ 513

11
4
14
—
—
$ 301

$ —

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ —

$ —
—
$ —

$ —
—
$ —

$ —

$ —
—
—
$ —

$ —
—
21
$21

$ —

—
—
—
—
—
$ —

$ —

$ — $

6

—
—
—
—
—
—
—

206
119
243
82
155
45
23
$ — $ 879

$ — $

—

$ — $

21
2
23

$ — $

3
255
$ — $ 258

—

$ — $

9

$ — $

4
75
46
$ — $ 125

—
—

$ — $

—
—

$ — $

8
23
21
52

$ — $ 741

—
—
—
—
—

11
4
14
4
40
$ — $ 814

$ — $ 909

Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)

$ 648

$ 261

(a)  Energy-related derivatives exclude $8 million associated with premiums and certain weather derivatives accounted for based on intrinsic value rather than 

fair value.

(b)  Energy-related derivatives exclude cash collateral of $277 million.
(c)  Excludes receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, payables related to pending investment purchases, and currencies. 

See Note 6 under “Nuclear Decommissioning” for additional information.

(d)  Includes investment securities pledged to creditors and collateral received and excludes payables related to the securities lending program. 

See Note 6 under “Nuclear Decommissioning” for additional information.

197

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

At December 31, 2017, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated 

level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:

At December 31, 2017:

Southern Company
Assets:

Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
Interest rate derivatives
Foreign currency derivatives
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(c)

Domestic equity
Foreign equity
U.S. Treasury and government  

agency securities

Municipal bonds
Corporate bonds
Mortgage and asset backed securities
Private equity
Other

Cash equivalents
Other investments
Total
Liabilities:

Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
Interest rate derivatives
Foreign currency derivatives
Contingent consideration
Total

Alabama Power
Assets:

Energy-related derivatives
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(d)

Domestic equity
Foreign equity
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
Corporate bonds
Mortgage and asset backed securities
Private equity
Other

Cash equivalents
Total
Liabilities:

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets for  
Identical  
Assets

Significant  
Other  
Observable  
Inputs

Significant  
Unobservable  
Inputs

Net Asset  
Value as a  
Practical  
Expedient

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

(NAV)

Total

(in millions)

$ 331
—
—

690
62
—

—
21
—
—
19
1,455
9
$2,587

$ 480
—
—
—
$ 480

$ 239
1
129

82
224
251

68
315
57
—
12
—
—
$1,378

$ 253
38
23
—
$ 314

$ —

$

4

442
62
—
21
—
—
6
349
$ 880

81
59
24
160
18
—
—
—
$ 346

$ —
—
—

—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—
—
1
$ 1

$ —
—
—
22
$22

$ —

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ —

$ —

$ — $ 570
1
129

—
—

—
—
—

—
—
—
29
—
—
—
$29

772
286
251

68
336
57
29
31
1,455
10
$3,995

$ — $ 733
38
23
22
$ — $ 816

—
—
—

$ — $

4

—
—
—
—
—
29
—
—
$29

523
121
24
181
18
29
6
349
$1,255

$ — $

10

Energy-related derivatives

$ —

$

10

198

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

At December 31, 2017:

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

(NAV)

Total

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets for  
Identical  
Assets

Significant  
Other  
Observable  
Inputs

Significant  
Unobservable  
Inputs

Net Asset  
Value as a  
Practical  
Expedient

Georgia Power
Assets:

Energy-related derivatives
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(d)(e)

Domestic equity
Foreign equity
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
Municipal bonds
Corporate bonds
Mortgage and asset backed securities
Other

Cash equivalents
Total
Liabilities:

Energy-related derivatives
Interest rate derivatives
Total

Mississippi Power
Assets:

Energy-related derivatives
Interest rate derivatives
Cash equivalents
Total
Liabilities:

Energy-related derivatives

Southern Power
Assets:

Energy-related derivatives
Foreign currency derivatives
Cash equivalents
Total
Liabilities:

Energy-related derivatives
Foreign currency derivatives
Contingent consideration
Total

Southern Company Gas
Assets:

Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)

Liabilities:

Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)

(in millions)

$ —

$

6

248
—
—
—
—
—
12
690
$ 950

$ —
—
$ —

$ —
—
224
$ 224

$ —

$ —
—
21
21

$

$ —
—
—
$ —

1
166
227
68
155
40
12
—
$ 675

$

$

$

$

$

19
5
24

2
1
—
3

9

$

3
129
—
$ 132

$

$

13
23
—
36

$ 331

$ 223

$ 479

$ 181

$ —

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ —

$ —
—
$ —

$ —
—
—
$ —

$ —

$ —
—
—
$ —

$ —
—
22
$22

$ —

$ —

$ — $

6

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

249
166
227
68
155
40
24
690
$ — $1,625

$ — $

—

$ — $

19
5
24

$ — $

2
1
224
$ — $ 227

—
—

$ — $

9

$ — $

3
129
21
$ — $ 153

—
—

$ — $

—
—

$ — $

13
23
22
58

$ — $ 554

$ —

660

(a)  Energy-related derivatives exclude $11 million associated with premiums and certain weather derivatives accounted for based on intrinsic value rather 

than fair value.

(b)  Energy-related derivatives exclude cash collateral of $193 million.
(c)  For additional detail, see the nuclear decommissioning trusts sections for Alabama Power and Georgia Power in this table.

199

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

(d)  Excludes receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, payables related to pending investment purchases, and currencies. See Note 6 

under “Nuclear Decommissioning” for additional information.

(e)  Includes investment securities pledged to creditors and collateral received and excludes payables related to the securities lending program. See Note 6 

under “Nuclear Decommissioning” for additional information.

Valuation Methodologies
The energy-related derivatives primarily consist of exchange-traded and over-the-counter financial products for natural gas and physical 

power products, including, from time to time, basis swaps. These are standard products used within the energy industry and are valued 

using the market approach. The inputs used are mainly from observable market sources, such as forward natural gas prices, power prices, 

implied volatility, and overnight index swap interest rates. Interest rate derivatives are also standard over-the-counter products that are 

valued using observable market data and assumptions commonly used by market participants. The fair value of interest rate derivatives 

reflects the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the swap agreement based on the market’s expectation of 

future interest rates. Additional inputs to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk, and 

occasionally, implied volatility of interest rate options. The fair value of cross-currency swaps reflects the net present value of expected 

payments and receipts under the swap agreement based on the market’s expectation of future foreign currency exchange rates. Additional 

inputs to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk, and discount rates. The interest rate 

derivatives and cross-currency swaps are categorized as Level 2 under Fair Value Measurements as these inputs are based on observable 

data and valuations of similar instruments. See Note 14 for additional information on how these derivatives are used.

For fair value measurements of the investments within the nuclear decommissioning trusts and the non-qualified deferred compensation 

trusts, external pricing vendors are designated for each asset class with each security specifically assigned a primary pricing source. For 

investments held within commingled funds, fair value is determined at the end of each business day through the net asset value, which 

is established by obtaining the underlying securities’ individual prices from the primary pricing source. A market price secured from the 

primary source vendor is then evaluated by management in its valuation of the assets within the trusts. As a general approach, fixed 

income market pricing vendors gather market data (including indices and market research reports) and integrate relative credit information, 

observed market movements, and sector news into proprietary pricing models, pricing systems, and mathematical tools. Dealer quotes and 

other market information, including live trading levels and pricing analysts’ judgments, are also obtained when available.

The NRC requires licensees of commissioned nuclear power reactors to establish a plan for providing reasonable assurance of funds for 

future decommissioning. See Note 6 under “Nuclear Decommissioning” for additional information.

Southern Power has contingent payment obligations related to certain acquisitions whereby Southern Power is primarily obligated to make 

generation-based payments to the seller, which commenced at the commercial operation of the respective facility and continue through 

2026. The obligation is categorized as Level 3 under Fair Value Measurements as the fair value is determined using significant unobservable 

inputs for the forecasted facility generation in MW-hours, as well as other inputs such as a fixed dollar amount per MW-hour, and a 

discount rate. The fair value of contingent consideration reflects the net present value of expected payments and any periodic change 

arising from forecasted generation is expected to be immaterial.

“Other investments” include investments categorized as Level 3 under Fair Value Measurements that are not traded in the open market. 

The fair value of these investments has been determined based on market factors including comparable multiples and the expectations 
regarding cash flows and business plan executions.

The fair value measurements of private equity investments held in Alabama Power’s nuclear decommissioning trusts that are calculated at 

net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient totaled $45 million and $29 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, 

respectively. Unfunded commitments related to the private equity investments totaled $50 million and $21 million at December 31, 2018 

and 2017, respectively. Private equity funds include funds-of-funds that invest in high-quality private equity funds across several market 

sectors, funds that invest in real estate assets, and a fund that acquires companies to create resale value. Private equity funds do not have 

redemption rights. Distributions from these funds will be received as the underlying investments in the funds are liquidated.

200

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, other financial instruments for which the carrying amount did not equal fair value were as follows:

Southern 
Company(a)(b)

Alabama  
Power

Georgia  
Power

Mississippi  
Power

Southern  
Power

(in millions)

Southern  
Company  
Gas(b)

At December 31, 2018:
Long-term debt, including securities due 

within one year:

Carrying amount
Fair value

At December 31, 2017:
Long-term debt, including securities due 

within one year:

Carrying amount
Fair value

$45,023
44,824

$8,120
8,370

$ 9,838
9,800

$1,579
1,546

$5,017
4,980

$5,940
5,965

$48,151
51,348

$7,625
8,305

$11,777
12,531

$2,086
2,076

$5,841
6,079

$6,048
6,471

(a)  Includes long-term debt of Gulf Power, which is classified as liabilities held for sale on Southern Company’s balance sheet at December 31, 2018. See 

Note 15 under “Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power” and “Assets Held for Sale” for additional information.

(b)  The long-term debt of Southern Company Gas is recorded at amortized cost, including the fair value adjustments at the effective date of the Merger. 

Southern Company Gas amortizes the fair value adjustments over the lives of the respective bonds.

The fair values are determined using Level 2 measurements and are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the 

current rates available to the registrants.

NOTE 14. DERIVATIVES

Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas are exposed to market risks, 

including commodity price risk, interest rate risk, weather risk, and occasionally foreign currency exchange rate risk. To manage the volatility 

attributable to these exposures, each company nets its exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into 

various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to each company’s policies in areas such as counterparty exposure 

and risk management practices. Southern Company Gas’ wholesale gas operations use various contracts in its commercial activities that 

generally meet the definition of derivatives. For the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas’ 

other businesses, each company’s policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to 

all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, 

value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis. Derivative instruments are recognized at fair value in the balance sheets as either 

assets or liabilities and are presented on a net basis. See Note 13 for additional fair value information. In the statements of cash flows, any 

cash impacts of settled energy-related and interest rate derivatives are recorded as operating activities. Any cash impacts of settled foreign 

currency derivatives are classified as operating or financing activities to correspond with classification of the hedged interest or principal, 

respectively. See Note 1 under “Financial Instruments” for additional information.

The registrants adopted ASU 2017-12 as of January 1, 2018. See Note 1 under “Recently Adopted Accounting Standards – Other” for 

additional information.

Energy-Related Derivatives
The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas enter into energy-related derivatives to hedge 

exposures to electricity, natural gas, and other fuel price changes. However, due to cost-based rate regulations and other various cost 

recovery mechanisms, the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities have limited exposure to 

market volatility in energy-related commodity prices. Each of the traditional electric operating companies and certain of the natural gas 

distribution utilities of Southern Company Gas manage fuel-hedging programs, implemented per the guidelines of their respective state 

PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies, through the use of financial derivative contracts, which are expected to continue to 

mitigate price volatility. The traditional electric operating companies (with respect to wholesale generating capacity) and Southern Power 

have limited exposure to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices because their long-term sales contracts shift substantially 

all fuel cost responsibility to the purchaser. However, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may be exposed to 

market volatility in energy-related commodity prices to the extent any uncontracted capacity is used to sell electricity. Southern Company 

Gas retains exposure to price changes that can, in a volatile energy market, be material and can adversely affect its results of operations.

201

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

Southern Company Gas also enters into weather derivative contracts as economic hedges of operating margins in the event of 

warmer-than-normal weather. Exchange-traded options are carried at fair value, with changes reflected in operating revenues. 

Non-exchange-traded options are accounted for using the intrinsic value method. Changes in the intrinsic value for non-exchange-traded 

contracts are reflected in operating revenues.

Energy-related derivative contracts are accounted for under one of three methods:

 O Regulatory Hedges – Energy-related derivative contracts designated as regulatory hedges relate primarily to the traditional electric 

operating companies’ and the natural gas distribution utilities’ fuel-hedging programs, where gains and losses are initially recorded 

as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as the underlying fuel is used in operations and 

ultimately recovered through the respective fuel cost recovery clauses.

 O Cash Flow Hedges – Gains and losses on energy-related derivatives designated as cash flow hedges (which are mainly used to hedge 

anticipated purchases and sales) are initially deferred in AOCI before being recognized in the statements of income in the same period 

and in the same income statement line item as the earnings effect of the hedged transactions.

 O Not Designated – Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are 

recognized in the statements of income as incurred.

Some energy-related derivative contracts require physical delivery as opposed to financial settlement, and this type of derivative is both 

common and prevalent within the electric and natural gas industries. When an energy-related derivative contract is settled physically, any 

cumulative unrealized gain or loss is reversed and the contract price is recognized in the respective line item representing the actual price of 

the underlying goods being delivered.

At December 31, 2018, the net volume of energy-related derivative contracts for natural gas positions, together with the longest hedge 

date over which the respective entity is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions and the 

longest non-hedge date for derivatives not designated as hedges, were as follows:

Southern Company(*)
Alabama Power
Georgia Power
Mississippi Power
Southern Power
Southern Company Gas(*)

Net Purchased
mmBtu

(in millions)

Longest
Hedge Date

Longest
Non-Hedge Date

431
74
153
63
15
120

2022
2022
2022
2022
2020
2021

2029
—
—
—
—
2029

(*)  Southern Company Gas’ derivative instruments include both long and short natural gas positions. A long position is a contract to purchase natural gas and 
a short position is a contract to sell natural gas. Southern Company Gas’ volume represents the net of long natural gas positions of 4,159 million mmBtu 
and short natural gas positions of 4,039 million mmBtu at December 31, 2018, which is also included in Southern Company’s total volume.

At December 31, 2018, the net volume of Southern Power’s energy-related derivative contracts for power to be sold was 2 million MWHs, 

all of which expire by 2020.

In addition to the volumes discussed above, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power enter into physical natural 

gas supply contracts that provide the option to sell back excess natural gas due to operational constraints. The maximum expected volume 

of natural gas subject to such a feature is 23 million mmBtu for Southern Company, which includes 4 million mmBtu for Alabama Power, 

7 million mmBtu for Georgia Power, 3 million mmBtu for Mississippi Power, and 7 million mmBtu for Southern Power.

For cash flow hedges of energy-related derivatives, the estimated pre-tax gains (losses) expected to be reclassified from AOCI to earnings 

for the year ending December 31, 2019 are immaterial for all registrants.

Interest Rate Derivatives
Southern Company and certain subsidiaries may enter into interest rate derivatives to hedge exposure to changes in interest rates. The 

derivatives employed as hedging instruments are structured to minimize ineffectiveness. Derivatives related to existing variable rate 

securities or forecasted transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges where the derivatives’ fair value gains or losses are recorded 

in OCI and are reclassified into earnings at the same time and presented on the same income statement line item as the earnings effect of 

the hedged transactions. Derivatives related to existing fixed rate securities are accounted for as fair value hedges, where the derivatives’ 

fair value gains or losses and hedged items’ fair value gains or losses are both recorded directly to earnings on the same income statement 

line item. Fair value gains or losses on derivatives that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of 
income as incurred.

202

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

At December 31, 2018, the following interest rate derivatives were outstanding:

Notional
Amount

Interest Rate  
Received

Weighted Average  
Interest Rate Paid

Hedge  
Maturity Date

Fair Value Gain (Loss) 
December 31, 2018

Fair Value Hedges of Existing Debt
Southern Company(*)

Southern Company(*)

Georgia Power

(in millions)

$ 300

1,500

200

Southern Company Consolidated

$2,000

(*)  Represents the Southern Company parent entity.

2.75%

2.35%

4.25%

3-month  
LIBOR + 0.92%
1-month  
LIBOR + 0.87%
3-month  
LIBOR + 2.46%

June 2020

July 2021

December 2019

(in millions)

$ (4)

(43)

(2)

$(49)

The estimated pre-tax gains (losses) related to interest rate derivatives expected to be reclassified from AOCI to interest expense for the 

year ending December 31, 2019 are $(19) million for Southern Company and immaterial for all other registrants. Deferred gains and losses 

related to interest rate derivatives are expected to be amortized into earnings through 2046 for the Southern Company parent entity, 

2035 for Alabama Power, 2037 for Georgia Power, 2028 for Mississippi Power, and 2046 for Southern Company Gas.

Foreign Currency Derivatives
Southern Company and certain subsidiaries, including Southern Power, may enter into foreign currency derivatives to hedge exposure 

to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, such as that arising from the issuance of debt denominated in a currency other than 

U.S. dollars. Derivatives related to forecasted transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges where the derivatives’ fair value gains 

or losses are recorded in OCI and are reclassified into earnings at the same time and on the same income statement line as the earnings 

effect of the hedged transactions, including foreign currency gains or losses arising from changes in the U.S. currency exchange rates. The 

derivatives employed as hedging instruments are structured to minimize ineffectiveness.

At December 31, 2018, the following foreign currency derivatives were outstanding:

Cash Flow Hedges of Existing Debt
Southern Power
Southern Power
Total

Pay 
Notional

(in millions)

Pay 
Rate

Receive 
Notional

Receive  
Rate

(in millions)

Hedge 
Maturity  
Date

Fair Value 
Gain (Loss) at  
December 31, 2018

(in millions)

$ 677
564
$1,241

2.95%
3.78%

€ 600
500
€1,100

1.00%
1.85%

June 2022
June 2026

$25
27
$52

The estimated pre-tax gains (losses) related to Southern Power’s foreign currency derivatives that will be reclassified from AOCI to earnings 

for the year ending December 31, 2019 are $(23) million.

Derivative Financial Statement Presentation and Amounts
Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas enter into derivative 

contracts that may contain certain provisions that permit intra-contract netting of derivative receivables and payables for routine billing 

and offsets related to events of default and settlements. Southern Company and certain subsidiaries also utilize master netting agreements 

to mitigate exposure to counterparty credit risk. These agreements may contain provisions that permit netting across product lines and 

against cash collateral. The fair value amounts of derivative assets and liabilities on the balance sheets are presented net to the extent that 

there are netting arrangements or similar agreements with the counterparties.

203

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the fair value of energy-related derivatives, interest rate derivatives, and foreign currency derivatives was 

reflected in the balance sheets as follows:

Derivative Category and Balance Sheet Location

Southern Company
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes

Energy-related derivatives:

Other current assets/Other current liabilities
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities
Assets held for sale, current/Liabilities held for sale, current

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges

Energy-related derivatives:

Other current assets/Other current liabilities
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities

Interest rate derivatives:

Other current assets/Other current liabilities
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities

Foreign currency derivatives:

Other current assets/Other current liabilities
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and  

fair value hedges

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

Energy-related derivatives:

Other current assets/Other current liabilities
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Gross amounts recognized
Gross amounts offset(a)
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets(b)

Alabama Power
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes

Energy-related derivatives:

Other current assets/Other current liabilities
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes
Gross amounts recognized
Gross amounts offset
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets

Georgia Power
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes

Energy-related derivatives:

Other current assets/Other current liabilities
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges

Interest rate derivatives:

Other current assets/Other current liabilities
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and  

fair value hedges

Gross amounts recognized
Gross amounts offset
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets

204

2018

2017

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

(in millions)

$

8
9
—
$ 17

$

3
1

—
—

—
75

$

$

$

23
26
6
55

7
2

19
30

23
—

$ 10
7
—
$ 17

$

3
—

1
—

—
129

$ 43
24
—
$ 67

$ 14
—

4
34

23
—

$ 79

$

81

$ 133

$ 75

$ 561
180
$ 741
$ 837
$(524)
$ 313

$

3
3
$
6
6
$
$ (4)
2
$

$

$

2
4
6

$ —
—

$ —
$
6
$ (6)
$ —

$ 575
325
$ 900
$1,036
$ (801)
$ 235

$ 380
170
$ 550
$ 700
$(405)
$ 295

$

$
$
$
$

$

$

$

$
$
$
$

4
6
10
10
(4)
6

8
13
21

2
—

2
23
(6)
17

$

2
2
$
4
4
$
$ (4)
$ —

$

$

2
4
6

$ —
—

$ —
$
6
$ (6)
$ —

$ 437
215
$ 652
$ 794
$(598)
$ 196

$

6
4
$ 10
$ 10
(4)
$
6
$

$

9
10
$ 19

$

4
1

$
5
$ 24
(6)
$
$ 18

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

Derivative Category and Balance Sheet Location

Mississippi Power
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes

Energy-related derivatives:

Other current assets/Other current liabilities
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes
Gross amounts recognized
Gross amounts offset
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets

Southern Power
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges

Energy-related derivatives:

Other current assets/Other current liabilities
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities

Foreign currency derivatives:

Other current assets/Other current liabilities
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and  

fair value hedges

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

Energy-related derivatives:

Other current assets/Other current liabilities

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Gross amounts recognized
Gross amounts offset
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets

Southern Company Gas
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes

Energy-related derivatives:

Assets from risk management activities/Liabilities from risk management  

activities-current

Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges

Energy-related derivatives:

Assets from risk management activities/Liabilities from risk management  

activities-current

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and  

fair value hedges

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

Energy-related derivatives:

Assets from risk management activities/Liabilities from risk management  

activities-current

Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Gross amounts recognized
Gross amounts offset(a)
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets(b)

2018

2017

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

(in millions)

$

1
2
3
$
$
3
$ (2)
1
$

$

3
1

—
75

$

$
$
$
$

$

3
6
9
9
(2)
7

6
2

23
—

$

1
1
2
$
$
3
$ (2)
1
$

$

3
—

—
129

$

$
$
$
$

6
3
9
9
(2)
7

$ 11
—

23
—

$ 79

$

31

$ 132

$ 34

$ —
$ —
$ 79
$ (3)
$ 76

$ —
$ —
31
$
(3)
$
28
$

$ —
$ —
$ 132
$ (3)
$ 129

$
2
2
$
$ 36
$
(3)
$ 33

$

$

2
—
2

$ —

$ —

$ 559
180
$ 739
$ 741
$(508)
$ 233

$

$

$

$

8
1
9

1

1

$

$

5
—
5

$ —

$ —

$ 574
325
$ 899
$ 909
$ (785)
$ 124

$ 379
170
$ 549
$ 554
$(390)
$ 164

$

$

$

$

8
—
8

3

3

$ 434
215
$ 649
$ 660
$(583)
$ 77

(a)  Gross amounts offset include cash collateral held on deposit in broker margin accounts of $277 million and $193 million at December 31, 2018 and 

2017, respectively.

(b)  Net amounts of derivative instruments outstanding exclude premium and intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $8 million and $11 million 

at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

205

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

Energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments were immaterial for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, 

and Southern Power at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the pre-tax effects of unrealized derivative gains (losses) arising from energy-related derivative 

instruments designated as regulatory hedging instruments and deferred were as follows:

Regulatory Hedge Unrealized Gain (Loss) Recognized in the Balance Sheet at December 31, 2018

Derivative Category and Balance  
Sheet Location

Southern 
Company

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 
Company Gas

Energy-related derivatives:

Other regulatory assets, current
Other regulatory assets, deferred
Assets held for sale, current
Other regulatory liabilities, current

Total energy-related derivative gains (losses)

$ (19)
(16)
(6)
1
$ (40)

$ (3)
(3)
—
—
$ (6)

(in millions)

$ (6)
(9)
—
—
$ (15)

$ (2)
(4)
—
—
$ (6)

$ (8)
—
—
1
$ (7)

Regulatory Hedge Unrealized Gain (Loss) Recognized in the Balance Sheet at December 31, 2017

Derivative Category and Balance  
Sheet Location

Southern 
Company(*)

Alabama 
Power

Georgia 
Power

Mississippi 
Power

Southern 

Company Gas(*)

Energy-related derivatives:

Other regulatory assets, current
Other regulatory assets, deferred
Other regulatory liabilities, current
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred

Total energy-related derivative gains (losses)

$ (34)
(18)
7
1
$ (44)

(in millions)

$ (4)
(3)
1
—
$ (6)

$ (7)
(6)
—
—
$ (13)

$ (5)
(2)
—
—
$ (7)

$ (4)
—
7
—
$ 3

(*)  Fair value gains and losses recorded in regulatory assets and liabilities include cash collateral held on deposit in broker margin accounts of $6 million at 

December 31, 2017.

For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, the pre-tax effects of cash flow hedge accounting on AOCI for the applicable 

registrants were as follows:

Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative

Southern Company

Energy-related derivatives
Interest rate derivatives
Foreign currency derivatives
Total

Southern Power

Energy-related derivatives
Foreign currency derivatives
Total

2018

$ 17
(1)
(78)
$ (62)

$ 10
(78)
$ (68)

2017

(in millions)

$ (47)
(2)
140
$ 91

$ (38)
140
$102

2016

$ 18
(180)
(58)
$ (220)

$ 14
(58)
$ (44)

Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative

Southern Company Gas

Energy-related derivatives
Interest rate derivatives
Total

Successor

Year Ended 
December 31, 2018

Year Ended 
December 31, 2017

(in millions)

July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016

Predecessor

January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016

(in millions)

$ 7
—
$ 7

$ (9)
—
$ (9)

$ 2
(5)
$ (3)

$ —
(64)
$(64)

206

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

For all years presented, the pre-tax effects of energy-related derivatives and interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedging 

instruments on AOCI were immaterial for the other registrants. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there was 

no material ineffectiveness recorded in earnings for any registrant. Upon the adoption of ASU 2017-12, beginning in 2018, ineffectiveness 

was no longer separately measured and recorded in earnings. See Note 1 for additional information.

The pre-tax effects of cash flow and fair value hedge accounting on income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were 

as follows:

Location and Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on  
Cash Flow and Fair Value Hedging Relationships

2018

2017

(in millions)

Southern Company
Total cost of natural gas
Gain (loss) on energy-related cash flow hedges(a)
Total depreciation and amortization
Gain (loss) on energy-related cash flow hedges(a)
Total interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
Gain (loss) on interest rate cash flow hedges(a)
Gain (loss) on foreign currency cash flow hedges(a)
Gain (loss) on interest rate fair value hedges(b)
Total other income (expense), net
Gain (loss) on foreign currency cash flow hedges(a)(c)
Alabama Power
Total interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
Gain (loss) on interest rate cash flow hedges(a)
Georgia Power
Total interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
Gain (loss) on interest rate cash flow hedges(a)
Gain (loss) on interest rate fair value hedges(b)
Mississippi Power
Total interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
Gain (loss) on interest rate cash flow hedges(a)
Southern Power
Total depreciation and amortization
Gain (loss) on energy-related cash flow hedges(a)
Total interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
Gain (loss) on foreign currency cash flow hedges(a)
Total other income (expense), net
Gain (loss) on foreign currency cash flow hedges(a)(c)

(a)  Reclassified from AOCI into earnings.

$ 1,539
2
3,131
7
(1,842)
(21)
(24)
(12)
114
(60)

$ (323)
(6)

$ (397)
(4)
2

$

$

(76)
(2)

493
7
(183)
(24)
23
(60)

$ 1,601
(2)
3,010
(16)
(1,694)
(21)
(23)
(22)
163
160

$ (305)
(6)

$ (419)
(4)
(3)

$

$

(42)
(2)

503
(17)
(191)
(23)
1
159

2016

$

613
(1)
2,502
2
(1,317)
(18)
(13)
(21)
50
(82)

$ (302)
(6)

$ (388)
(4)
(1)

$

$

(74)
3

352
2
(117)
(13)
6
(82)

(b)  For fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative contracts are generally equal to changes in the fair value of the underlying debt and have 

no material impact on income.

(c)  The reclassification from AOCI into other income (expense), net completely offsets currency gains and losses arising from changes in the U.S. currency 

exchange rates used to record the euro-denominated notes.

Location and Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized 
in Income on Cash Flow and Fair Value  
Hedging Relationships

Year Ended 
December 31, 2018

Year Ended 
December 31, 2017

July 1, 2016 
through  
December 31, 2016

January 1, 2016 
through  
June 30, 2016

Successor

Predecessor

Southern Company Gas
Total cost of natural gas
Gain (loss) on energy-related cash flow hedges(*)

(in millions)

(in millions)

$1,539
2

$1,601
(2)

$ 613
(1)

$ 755
(1)

(*)  Amounts reflect gains or losses on cash flow hedges that were reclassified from AOCI into earnings.

207

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

The pre-tax effects of cash flow hedge accounting on income for interest rate derivatives were immaterial for all other registrants for all 

years presented.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the following amounts were recorded on the balance sheets related to cumulative basis adjustments for 

fair value hedges:

Balance Sheet Location of Hedged Items

Southern Company
Securities due within one year
Long-term debt

Georgia Power
Securities due within one year
Long-term debt

Carrying Amount of the Hedged Item

Cumulative Amount of Fair Value 
Hedging Adjustment included in 
Carrying Amount of the Hedged Item

At December 31, 
2018

At December 31, 
2017

At December 31, 
2018

At December 31, 
2017

(in millions)

(in millions)

$ (498)
(2,052)

$ (746)
(2,553)

$ (498)
—

$ (746)
(498)

$ 2
41

$ 2
—

$ 3
35

$ 3
1

The pre-tax effects of energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the statements of income for the years ended 

December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 for the applicable registrants were as follows:

Derivatives in Non-Designated 
Hedging Relationships

Statements of Income Location

Southern Company
Energy-related derivatives

Natural gas revenues(*)
Cost of natural gas
Wholesale electric revenues

Total derivatives in non-designated hedging relationships

Gain (Loss)

2017

(in millions)

$ (80)
(2)
(4)
$ (86)

2018

$(122)
(6)
2
$(126)

2016

$ 33
3
2
$ 38

(*)  Excludes the impact of weather derivatives recorded in natural gas revenues of $5 million, $23 million, and $6 million for the years ended December 31, 

2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, as they are accounted for based on intrinsic value rather than fair value.

Gain (Loss)

Successor

Predecessor

Derivatives in Non-
Designated Hedging 
Relationships

Statements of 
Income Location

For the 
Year Ended 
December 31, 2018

For the 
Year Ended 
December 31, 2017

July 1, 2016 through 
 December 31, 2016

January 1, 2016 through 
June 30, 2016

(in millions)

(in millions)

Southern Company Gas

Energy-related derivatives

Natural gas revenues(*)
Cost of natural gas

Total derivatives in non-designated 

hedging relationships

$(122)
(6)

$(128)

$(80)
(2)

$(82)

$33
3

$36

$ (1)
(62)

$(63)

(*)  Excludes the impact of weather derivatives recorded in natural gas revenues of $5 million and $23 million for the successor years ended December 31, 

2018 and 2017, respectively, $6 million for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and $3 million for the predecessor period of 
January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, as they are accounted for based on intrinsic value rather than fair value.

The pre-tax effects of energy-related derivatives and interest rate derivatives not designated as hedging instruments were immaterial for 

all other registrants for all years presented.

Contingent Features
Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas do not have any credit 

arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. There 

are certain derivatives that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of various credit rating changes of certain 

Southern Company subsidiaries. At December 31, 2018, the registrants had no collateral posted with derivative counterparties to satisfy 
these arrangements.

208

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

For the registrants with interest rate derivatives at December 31, 2018, the fair value of interest rate derivative liabilities with contingent 

features and the maximum potential collateral requirements arising from the credit-risk-related contingent features, at a rating below BBB- 

and/or Baa3, was immaterial. At December 31, 2018, the fair value of energy-related derivative liabilities with contingent features and the 

maximum potential collateral requirements arising from the credit-risk-related contingent features, at a rating below BBB- and/or Baa3, 

were immaterial for all registrants. The maximum potential collateral requirements arising from the credit-risk-related contingent features 

for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power include certain agreements that could require collateral in the event 

that one or more Southern Company power pool participants has a credit rating change to below investment grade. Following the sale of 

Gulf Power to NextEra Energy, Gulf Power is continuing to participate in the Southern Company power pool for a defined transition period 

that, subject to certain potential adjustments, is scheduled to end on January 1, 2024.

Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. If collateral is required, fair value amounts 

recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral are not offset against fair value amounts 

recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty.

Alabama Power and Southern Power maintain accounts with certain regional transmission organizations to facilitate financial derivative 

transactions. Based on the value of the positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, Alabama Power and Southern 

Power may be required to post collateral. At December 31, 2018, cash collateral posted in these accounts was immaterial. Southern 

Company Gas maintains accounts with brokers or the clearing houses of certain exchanges to facilitate financial derivative transactions. 

Based on the value of the positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, Southern Company Gas may be required to 

deposit cash into these accounts. At December 31, 2018, cash collateral held on deposit in broker margin accounts was $277 million.

The registrants are exposed to losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties’ nonperformance. The registrants only 

enter into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody’s and S&P or 

with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. The registrants have also established risk management 

policies and controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate their exposure to counterparty 

credit risk. Prior to entering into a physical transaction, Southern Company Gas assigns physical wholesale counterparties an internal credit 

rating and credit limit based on the counterparties’ Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch ratings, commercially available credit reports, and audited 

financial statements. Southern Company Gas may require counterparties to pledge additional collateral when deemed necessary.

In addition, Southern Company Gas conducts credit evaluations and obtains appropriate internal approvals for the counterparty’s line of 

credit before any transaction with the counterparty is executed. In most cases, the counterparty must have an investment grade rating, 

which includes a minimum long-term debt rating of Baa3 from Moody’s and BBB- from S&P. Generally, Southern Company Gas requires 

credit enhancements by way of a guaranty, cash deposit, or letter of credit for transaction counterparties that do not have investment 

grade ratings.

Southern Company Gas also utilizes master netting agreements whenever possible to mitigate exposure to counterparty credit risk. When 

Southern Company Gas is engaged in more than one outstanding derivative transaction with the same counterparty and it also has a 

legally enforceable netting agreement with that counterparty, the “net” mark-to-market exposure represents the netting of the positive 

and negative exposures with that counterparty and a reasonable measure of Southern Company Gas’ credit risk. Southern Company Gas 

also uses other netting agreements with certain counterparties with whom it conducts significant transactions. Master netting agreements 

enable Southern Company Gas to net certain assets and liabilities by counterparty. Southern Company Gas also nets across product lines 

and against cash collateral provided the master netting and cash collateral agreements include such provisions. Southern Company Gas 

may require counterparties to pledge additional collateral when deemed necessary.

The registrants do not anticipate a material adverse effect on their respective financial statements as a result of counterparty 

nonperformance.

NOTE 15. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas
On July 1, 2016, Southern Company completed the Merger for a total purchase price of approximately $8.0 billion and Southern Company 

Gas became a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of Southern Company. At the effective time of the Merger, each share of Southern Company 

Gas common stock, other than certain excluded shares, was converted into the right to receive $66 in cash, without interest. Also at the 

effective time of the Merger, all of the outstanding Southern Company Gas RSUs, restricted stock awards, non-employee director stock 

awards, stock options, and PSUs were either redeemed or converted into Southern Company RSUs. See Note 12 for additional information.

209

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

The application of the acquisition method of accounting was pushed down to Southern Company Gas. The excess of the purchase price over 

the fair values of Southern Company Gas’ assets and liabilities was recorded as goodwill, which represents a different basis of accounting from 

Southern Company Gas’ historical basis prior to the Merger. The following table presents the final purchase price allocation:

Southern Company Gas Purchase Price

Current assets
Property, plant, and equipment
Goodwill
Other intangible assets
Regulatory assets
Other assets
Current liabilities
Other liabilities
Long-term debt
Contingently redeemable noncontrolling interest
Total purchase price

Southern
Company Gas 
Successor
New Basis

(in millions)

Southern
Company Gas 
Predecessor
Old Basis

Change in Basis

(in millions)

$ 1,557
10,108
5,967
400
1,118
229
(2,201)
(4,742)
(4,261)
(174)
$ 8,001

$ 1,474
10,148
1,813
101
679
273
(2,205)
(4,600)
(3,709)
(41)
$ 3,933

$

83
(40)
4,154
299
439
(44)
4
(142)
(552)
(133)
$ 4,068

Southern Company Gas’ Results of Operations and Pro Forma Financial Information
The results of operations for Southern Company Gas have been included in Southern Company’s consolidated financial statements from 

the date of acquisition and consisted of operating revenues of $1.7 billion and net income of $114 million in 2016.

The following summarized unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of earnings information assumes that the acquisition of Southern 

Company Gas was completed on January 1, 2015. The summarized unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of earnings information 

includes adjustments for (i) intercompany sales, (ii) amortization of intangible assets, (iii) adjustments to interest expense to reflect current 

interest rates on Southern Company Gas debt and additional interest expense associated with borrowings by Southern Company to fund 

the Merger, and (iv) the elimination of nonrecurring expenses associated with the Merger.

Operating revenues (in millions)
Net income attributable to Southern Company (in millions)
Basic EPS
Diluted EPS

2016

$21,791
$ 2,591
2.70
$
2.68
$

These unaudited pro forma results are for comparative purposes only and may not be indicative of the results that would have occurred 

had this acquisition been completed on January 1, 2015 or the results that would be attained in the future.

Southern Company Acquisition of PowerSecure
In May 2016, Southern Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of PowerSecure for $18.75 per common share in cash, resulting in an 

aggregate purchase price of $429 million. As a result, PowerSecure became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company.

The acquisition of PowerSecure was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting with the assets acquired and liabilities 

assumed recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. The following table presents the final purchase price allocation:

PowerSecure Purchase Price

Current assets
Property, plant, and equipment
Intangible assets
Goodwill
Other assets
Current liabilities
Long-term debt, including current portion
Deferred credits and other liabilities
Total purchase price

210

(in millions)
$ 172
46
106
284
4
(121)
(48)
(14)
$ 429

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

The results of operations for PowerSecure have been included in Southern Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of 
acquisition and are immaterial to the consolidated financial results of Southern Company. Pro forma results of operations have not been 
presented for the acquisition because the effects of the acquisition were immaterial to Southern Company’s consolidated financial results 
for all periods presented.

Southern Company’s Sale of Gulf Power
On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of all of the capital stock of Gulf Power to 700 Universe, LLC, a wholly-owned 
subsidiary of NextEra Energy, for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), 
subject to customary working capital adjustments.

The assets and liabilities of Gulf Power are classified as assets held for sale and liabilities held for sale on Southern Company’s balance 
sheet as of December 31, 2018. See “Assets Held for Sale” herein for additional information.

Southern Power
During 2018 and 2017, Southern Power or one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries acquired or completed construction of the facilities 
discussed below. Acquisition-related costs were expensed as incurred and were not material for any of the years presented.

Acquisitions During the Year Ended December 31, 2018
During 2018, Southern Power acquired and completed the project below and acquired the Wild Horse Mountain and Reading wind facilities 
discussed under “Construction Projects Completed and/or in Progress” below.

Project Facility
Gaskell West 1

Resource
Solar

Seller, Acquisition Date
Recurrent Energy 

Development Holdings, 

LLC, January 26, 2018

Approximate 
Nameplate 
Capacity (MW)
20

Location
Kern County, CA

Ownership 
Percentage
100% of 
Class B

Actual  
COD
(*) March 2018

PPA Contract 
Period
20 years

(*)  Southern Power owns 100% of the class B membership interests under a tax equity partnership.

The Gaskell West 1 facility did not have operating revenues or activities prior to being placed in service during March 2018.

Acquisitions During the Year Ended December 31, 2017
The following table presents Southern Power’s acquisition activity for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Project Facility
Bethel

Resource
Wind

Seller, Acquisition Date
Invenergy Wind Global 

Approximate 
Nameplate 
Capacity (MW)

Location
276 Castro County, TX

Ownership 
Percentage

Actual 
COD
100%  January 2017

PPA Contract 
Period
12 years

Cactus Flats(*)

Wind

LLC, January 6, 2017
RES America 

Developments, Inc., 
July 31, 2017

148 Concho County, TX

100%

July 2018 12 years and 
15 years

(*)  On July 31, 2017, Southern Power purchased 100% of the Cactus Flats facility. In August 2018, Southern Power closed on a tax equity partnership and 

owns 100% of the class B membership interests.

Southern Power’s aggregate purchase price for acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $539 million. The fair values of 
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were finalized in 2017 and recorded as follows:

Restricted cash
CWIP
Other assets
Accounts payable
Total purchase price

2017
(in millions)
$ 16
534
5
(16)
$539

In 2017, total revenues of $15 million and net income of $17 million, primarily as a result of PTCs, were recognized in the consolidated 
statements of income by Southern Power related to the 2017 acquisitions. The Bethel facility did not have operating revenues or activities 
prior to completion of construction and being placed in service, and the Cactus Flats facility was still under construction. Therefore, 
supplemental pro forma information as though the acquisitions occurred as of the beginning of 2017 is not meaningful and has been omitted.

211

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

Construction Projects Completed and/or in Progress
During 2018, in accordance with its growth strategy, Southern Power started, continued, or completed construction of the projects set 

forth in the table below. Total aggregate construction costs, excluding the acquisition costs, are expected to be between $575 million and 

$640 million for the Plant Mankato expansion, Wild Horse Mountain, and Reading facilities. At December 31, 2018, construction costs 

included in CWIP related to these projects totaled $289 million, except for the Plant Mankato expansion which is classified as assets held 

for sale in the financial statements. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

Project Facility

Resource

Approximate 
Nameplate 
Capacity (MW)

Location

Actual/ 
Expected 
COD

PPA Counterparties

PPA Contract 
Period

Construction Projects 
Completed During  
the Year Ended 
December 31, 2018

Cactus Flats(a)

Projects Under 
Construction at 
December 31, 2018

Wind

148 Concho County, TX

July 2018

General Motors, LLC and 

General Mills Operations, LLC

12 years and 
15 years

Mankato expansion(b)

Natural Gas

385

Mankato, MN

Second  

Northern States Power 

20 years

Wild Horse Mountain(c)

Reading(d)

Wind

Wind

100

Pushmataha  

Fourth  

Arkansas Electric Cooperative

20 years

quarter 2019

Company

County, OK

quarter 2019

200

Osage and Lyon 

Second  

Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD

12 years

Counties, KS

quarter 2020

(a)  In July 2017, Southern Power purchased 100% of the Cactus Flats facility. In August 2018, Southern Power closed on a tax equity partnership and now 

owns 100% of the class B membership interests.

(b)  In November 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato, including this expansion currently under 

construction. See “Sales of Natural Gas Plants” below.

(c)  In May 2018, Southern Power purchased 100% of the Wild Horse Mountain facility. Southern Power may enter into a tax equity partnership, in which case 

it would then own 100% of the class B membership interests. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

(d)  In August 2018, Southern Power purchased 100% of the membership interests of the Reading facility from the joint development arrangement with 

Renewable Energy Systems Americas, Inc. described below. Southern Power may enter into a tax equity partnership, in which case it would then own 100% 
of the class B membership interests. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

Development Projects
During 2017, Southern Power purchased wind turbine equipment to be used for various development and construction projects. Any wind 

projects using this equipment and reaching commercial operation by the end of 2021 are expected to qualify for 80% PTCs.

During 2016, Southern Power entered into a joint development agreement with Renewable Energy Systems Americas, Inc. (RES) to develop 
and construct wind projects. Concurrent with the agreement, Southern Power purchased wind turbine equipment from Siemens Wind 

Power, Inc. and Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. to be used for construction of these projects. Several wind projects using this 

equipment, as well as other purchased equipment, have successfully originated, directly or indirectly, from the partnership with RES and are 

expected to reach commercial operation before the end of 2020, thus qualifying for 100% PTCs.

Southern Power continues to evaluate and refine the deployment of the wind turbine equipment to potential joint development and 

construction projects as well as the amount of MW capacity to be constructed. During the third quarter 2018, as a result of a review of 

various options for probable dispositions of wind turbine equipment not deployed to development or construction projects, Southern 

Power recorded a $36 million asset impairment charge on the equipment.

Subsequent to December 31, 2018 and as part of management’s continuous review of disposition options, approximately $53 million of 

this equipment is being marketed for sale and will be classified as held for sale.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

212

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

Sales of Renewable Facility Interests
On May 22, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly 

owning substantially all of Southern Power’s solar facilities, to Global Atlantic for approximately $1.2 billion. Since Southern Power retains 

control of the limited partnership through its wholly-owned general partner, the sale was recorded as an equity transaction and Southern 

Power will continue to consolidate SP Solar in its financial statements. On the date of the transaction, the noncontrolling interest was 

increased by $511 million to reflect 33% of the carrying value of the partnership. This difference, partially offset by the tax impact and 

other related transaction charges, also resulted in a $410 million decrease to Southern Power’s common stockholder’s equity.

On December 11, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, which owns a portfolio of 

eight operating wind facilities, to three financial investors for approximately $1.2 billion. Since Southern Power retains control of SP Wind, 

it will continue to consolidate SP Wind in its financial statements. The tax equity investors together will generally receive 40% of the cash 

distributions from available cash and will receive a 99% allocation of tax attributes, including future PTCs.

Sales of Natural Gas Plants
On December 4, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of all of its equity interests in the Florida Plants to NextEra Energy for 

$203 million. In contemplation of this sale transaction, Southern Power recorded an asset impairment charge of approximately $119 million 

($89 million after tax) in May 2018.

On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement with Northern States Power to sell all of its equity interests in Plant 

Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million. 

The completion of the disposition is subject to the expansion unit reaching commercial operation as well as various other customary 

conditions to closing, including working capital and timing adjustments. The ultimate purchase price will decrease $66,667 per day for each 

day after June 1, 2019 that the expansion has not achieved commercial operation, not to exceed $15 million. This transaction is subject 

to FERC and state commission approvals and is expected to close in mid-2019. The assets and liabilities of Plant Mankato are classified as 

assets held for sale and liabilities held for sale on Southern Company’s and Southern Power’s balance sheet as of December 31, 2018. See 

“Assets Held for Sale” herein for additional information. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

Southern Company Gas
See “Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas” herein for information regarding the Merger.

Investment in SNG
In 2016, Southern Company Gas, through a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary, acquired a 50% equity interest in SNG from Kinder Morgan, 

Inc. for $1.4 billion. SNG owns a 7,000-mile pipeline system connecting natural gas supply basins in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and 

Alabama to markets in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and Tennessee. The purchase price exceeded the 

underlying ownership interest in the net assets of SNG by approximately $700 million. This basis difference was attributable to goodwill 

and deferred tax assets. While the deferred tax assets will be amortized through deferred tax expense, the goodwill will not be amortized 

and is not required to be tested for impairment on an annual basis.

In March 2017, Southern Company Gas made an additional $50 million contribution to maintain its 50% equity interest in SNG. See Note 7 

under “Southern Company Gas” for additional information on this investment.

Southern Company Gas’ investment in SNG decreased by $104 million at December 31, 2017 related to the impact of the Tax Reform 

Legislation and new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from Southern Company Gas’ inclusion in the 

consolidated Southern Company state tax filings.

Sale of Pivotal Home Solutions
On June 4, 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the stock sale of Pivotal Home Solutions to American Water Enterprises LLC for a 

total cash purchase price of $365 million, which includes the final working capital adjustment. This disposition resulted in a net loss of 

$67 million, which includes $34 million of income tax expense. In contemplation of the transaction, a goodwill impairment charge of 

$42 million was recorded during the first quarter 2018. The income tax expense included tax on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes 

and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously. Southern Company Gas and American Water Enterprises LLC 

entered into a transition services agreement whereby Southern Company Gas provided certain administrative and operational services 

through November 4, 2018.

213

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas
On July 1, 2018, a Southern Company Gas subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, completed the sales of the assets of two of its natural gas 

distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. for a total cash purchase price of $1.7 billion, which 

includes the final working capital and other adjustments. This disposition resulted in a pre-tax gain that was entirely offset by $205 million 

of income tax expense, resulting in no material net income impact. The income tax expense included tax on goodwill not deductible for tax 

purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously. Southern Company Gas and South Jersey Industries, Inc. 

entered into transition services agreements whereby Southern Company Gas will provide certain administrative and operational services 

through no later than July 31, 2020.

Sale of Florida City Gas
On July 29, 2018, Southern Company Gas and its wholly-owned direct subsidiary, NUI Corporation, completed the stock sale of Pivotal 

Utility Holdings, which primarily consisted of Florida City Gas, to NextEra Energy for a total cash purchase price of $587 million, which 

includes the final working capital adjustment. This disposition resulted in a net gain of $16 million, which includes $103 million of income 

tax expense. The income tax expense included tax on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had 

not been recorded previously. Southern Company Gas and NextEra Energy entered into a transition services agreement whereby Southern 

Company Gas will provide certain administrative and operational services through no later than July 29, 2020.

Assets Held for Sale
As discussed previously, Southern Company and Southern Power each have assets and liabilities held for sale on their balance sheets at 

December 31, 2018. Assets and liabilities held for sale have been classified separately on each company’s balance sheet at the lower of 

carrying value or fair value less costs to sell at the time the criteria for held-for-sale classification were met. For assets and liabilities held 

for sale recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value of assets held for sale is based primarily on unobservable inputs 

(Level 3), which includes the agreed upon sales prices in executed sales agreements.

Upon classification as held for sale in May 2018 for the Florida Plants and November 2018 for Plant Mankato, Southern Power ceased 

recognizing depreciation on the property, plant, and equipment to be sold. The Florida Plants sale was completed on December 4, 2018. 

Since the depreciation of the assets sold in the Gulf Power transaction continued to be reflected in customer rates through the closing 

date and was reflected in the carryover basis of the assets when sold, Southern Company continued to record depreciation on those assets 

through the date the transaction closed. Likewise, since the depreciation of the assets sold in the Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, and 

Florida City Gas transactions continued to be reflected in customer rates and was reflected in the carryover basis of the assets when sold, 

Southern Company Gas continued to record depreciation on those assets through the respective date that each transaction closed.

The following table provides Southern Company’s and Southern Power’s major classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale at 

December 31, 2018:

Assets Held for Sale:
Current assets
Total property, plant, and equipment
Other non-current assets
Total Assets Held for Sale

Liabilities Held for Sale:
Current liabilities
Long-term debt
Accumulated deferred income taxes
Other non-current liabilities
Total Liabilities Held for Sale

Southern  
Company

Southern
Power

(in millions)

$ 393
4,623
727
$5,743

$ 425
1,286
618
932
$3,261

$

8
576
—
$584

$ 15
—
—
—
$ 15

Southern Company, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas each concluded that the asset sales, both individually and combined, did 

not represent a strategic shift in operations that has, or is expected to have, a major effect on its operations and financial results; therefore, 

none of the assets related to the sales have been classified as discontinued operations for any of the periods presented.

214

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

Gulf Power and the Florida Plants represent individually significant components of Southern Company and Southern Power, respectively; 

therefore, pre-tax income for these components for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 are presented below:

Earnings (loss) before income taxes:
Gulf Power
Southern Power’s Florida Plants(*)

2018

$140
$ 49

2017
(in millions)

$229
$ 37

2016

$231
$ 37

(*)  Earnings before income taxes for the Florida Plants in 2018 represents the period from January 1, 2018 to December 4, 2018 (the divestiture date).

NOTE 16. SEGMENT AND RELATED INFORMATION

Southern Company
The primary businesses of the Southern Company system are electricity sales by the traditional electric operating companies and Southern 

Power and the distribution of natural gas by Southern Company Gas. The traditional electric operating companies – Alabama Power, 

Georgia Power, Gulf Power (through December 31, 2018), and Mississippi Power – are vertically integrated utilities providing electric 

service in four Southeastern states. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. Southern 

Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity 

at market-based rates in the wholesale market. Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through its natural gas distribution utilities 

and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing 

services. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas completed sales of three of its natural gas distribution utilities. See Note 15 for additional 

information regarding disposition activities.

Southern Company’s reportable business segments are the sale of electricity by the traditional electric operating companies, the sale 

of electricity in the competitive wholesale market by Southern Power, and the sale of natural gas and other complementary products 

and services by Southern Company Gas. Revenues from sales by Southern Power to the traditional electric operating companies were 

$435 million, $392 million, and $419 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Revenues from sales of natural gas from Southern 

Company Gas to the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power were $32 million and $119 million, respectively, in 2018, 

$23 million and $119 million, respectively, in 2017, and $11 million and $17 million, respectively, in 2016. The “All Other” column includes 

the Southern Company parent entity, which does not allocate operating expenses to business segments. Also, this category includes 

segments below the quantitative threshold for separate disclosure. These segments include providing energy technologies and services to 

electric utilities and large industrial, commercial, institutional, and municipal customers, as well as investments in telecommunications and 

leveraged lease projects. All other inter-segment revenues are not material.

215

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

Financial data for business segments and products and services for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:

Electric Utilities

Traditional
Electric
Operating
Companies

Southern
Power

Eliminations

Total

Southern 
Company 
Gas

All
Other

(in millions)

Eliminations

Consolidated

$16,843

$ 2,205

$(477)

$18,571

$ 3,909

$1,213

$ (198)

$ 23,495

2,072
23

(1)
852
371

2,117
—
79,382
6,077

493
8

—
183
(164)

187
2
14,883
315

—
—

—
—
—

—

(306)
—

2,565
31

(1)
1,035
207

2,304
2
93,959
6,392

500
4

148
228
464

372
5,015
21,448
1,399

66
8

2
580
(222)

(453)
298
3,285
414

—
(5)

(1)
(1)
—

3
—
(1,778)
—

3,131
38

148
1,842
449

2,226
5,315
116,914
8,205

$16,884
1,954
14

$ 2,075
503
7

$(419)
—
—

$18,540
2,457
21

$ 3,920
501
3

$ 741
52
11

$ (170)
—
(9)

$ 23,031
3,010
26

1
820
1,021

(193)
—
72,204
3,836

—
191
(939)

1,071
2
15,206
268

—
—
—

—
—
(325)
—

1
1,011
82

878
2
87,085
4,104

106
200
367

243
5,967
22,987
1,525

(1)
490
(307)

(279)
299
2,552
355

—
(7)
—

—
—
(1,619)
—

106
1,694
142

842
6,268
111,005
5,984

$16,803
1,881
6

$ 1,577
352
7

$(439)
—
—

$17,941
2,233
13

$ 1,652
238
2

$ 463
31
20

$ (160)
—
(15)

$ 19,896
2,502
20

2
814
1,286
2,233
—
72,141
4,852

—
117
(195)
338
2
15,169
2,114

—
—
—
—
—
(316)
—

2
931
1,091
2,571
2
86,994
6,966

60
81
76
114
5,967
21,853
618

(3)
317
(216)
(230)
282
2,474
41

—
(12)
—
(7)
—
(1,624)
(1)

59
1,317
951
2,448
6,251
109,697
7,624

2018
Operating revenues
Depreciation and 

amortization
Interest income
Earnings from equity 

method investments

Interest expense
Income taxes (benefit)
Segment net income  

(loss)(a)(b)(c)(d)

Goodwill
Total assets
Gross property additions
2017
Operating revenues
Depreciation and amortization
Interest income
Earnings from equity method 

investments
Interest expense
Income taxes (benefit)
Segment net income  

(loss)(a)(b)(e)(f)

Goodwill
Total assets
Gross property additions
2016
Operating revenues
Depreciation and amortization
Interest income
Earnings from equity method 

investments
Interest expense
Income taxes (benefit)
Segment net income (loss)(a)(b)
Goodwill
Total assets
Gross property additions

(a)  Attributable to Southern Company.
(b)  Segment net income (loss) for the traditional electric operating companies includes pre-tax charges for estimated losses on plants under construction of 

$1.1 billion ($722 million after tax) in 2018, $3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax) in 2017, and $428 million ($264 million after tax) in 2016. See Note 2 under 
“Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction” and “Mississippi Power – Kemper County Energy Facility – Schedule and Cost Estimate” for additional information.

(c)  Segment net income (loss) for Southern Power includes pre-tax impairment charges of $156 million ($117 million after tax) in 2018. See Note 15 under 

“Southern Power – Development Projects” and “ – Sales of Natural Gas Plants” for additional information.

(d)  Segment net income (loss) for Southern Company Gas includes a net gain on dispositions of $291 million ($51 million loss after tax) in 2018 related to the 

Southern Company Gas Dispositions and a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million in 2018 related to the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. See Note 15 
under “Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

216

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

(e)  Segment net income (loss) for the traditional electric operating companies includes a pre-tax charge for the write-down of Gulf Power’s ownership of Plant 

Scherer Unit 3 of $33 million ($20 million after tax) in 2017. See Note 2 under “Southern Company – Gulf Power” for additional information.

(f)  Segment net income (loss) includes income tax expense of $367 million for the traditional electric operating companies, income tax benefit of $743 million 

for Southern Power, and income tax expense of $93 million for Southern Company Gas in 2017 related to the Tax Reform Legislation.

Products and Services

Year

2018
2017
2016

Year

2018
2017
2016

Electric Utilities’ Revenues

Retail

Wholesale

Other

Total

$15,222
15,330
15,234

(in millions)

$ 2,516
2,426
1,926

Southern Company Gas’ Revenues

Gas 
Distribution  
Operations

Gas 
Marketing  
Services

$ 3,155
3,024
1,266

(in millions)

$ 568
860
354

$833
784
781

All 
Other

$186
36
32

$18,571
18,540
17,941

Total

$ 3,909
3,920
1,652

Southern Company Gas
Southern Company Gas manages its business through four reportable segments - gas distribution operations, gas pipeline investments, 

wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services. The non-reportable segments are combined and presented as all other. During 2018, 

Southern Company Gas changed its reportable segments to further align the way its new Chief Operating Decision Maker reviews 

operating results and has reclassified prior years’ data to conform to the new reportable segment presentation. This change resulted in a 

new reportable segment, gas pipeline investments, which was formerly included in gas midstream operations.

Gas distribution operations is the largest component of Southern Company Gas’ business and includes natural gas local distribution utilities 

that construct, manage, and maintain intrastate natural gas pipelines and gas distribution facilities in four states. In July 2018, Southern 

Company Gas sold three of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, and Florida City Gas. See Note 15 under 

“Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

Gas pipeline investments consists of joint ventures in natural gas pipeline investments including a 50% interest in SNG, two significant 

pipeline construction projects, and a 50% joint ownership interest in the Dalton Pipeline. These natural gas pipelines enable the provision of 

diverse sources of natural gas supplies to the customers of Southern Company Gas. See Notes 5 and 7 for additional information.

Wholesale gas services provides natural gas asset management and/or related logistics services for each of Southern Company Gas’ utilities 

except Nicor Gas as well as for non-affiliated companies. Additionally, wholesale gas services engages in natural gas storage and gas 

pipeline arbitrage and related activities.

Gas marketing services provides natural gas marketing to end-use customers primarily in Georgia and Illinois through SouthStar. On June 4, 

2018, Southern Company Gas sold Pivotal Home Solutions, which provided home equipment protection products and services. See Note 15 

under “Southern Company Gas – Sale of Pivotal Home Solutions” for additional information.

The all other column includes segments below the quantitative threshold for separate disclosure, including the storage and fuels 

operations, which was formerly included in gas midstream operations, and the other subsidiaries that fall below the quantitative threshold 

for separate disclosure.

After the Merger, Southern Company Gas changed the segment performance measure to net income, which is utilized by its parent 

company. In order to properly assess net income by segment, Southern Company Gas executed various intercompany note agreements to 

revise interest charges to its segments. Since such agreements did not exist in the predecessor period, Southern Company Gas is unable to 

provide the comparable net income for that period.

217

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

Financial data for business segments for the successor years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the successor period of July 1, 2016 

through December 31, 2016, and the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 were as follows:

Gas  
Distribution  
Operations(a)(b)

Gas  
Pipeline  
Investments

Wholesale  
Gas 
Services(c)

Gas  
Marketing  

Services(b)(d)

Total

(in millions)

All  
Other

Eliminations Consolidated

Successor – Year ended  

December 31, 2018:

Operating revenues
Depreciation and amortization
Operating income (loss)
Earnings from equity 

method investments

Interest expense
Income taxes (benefit)
Segment net income (loss)
Gross property additions
Successor – Total assets at 

December 31, 2018
Successor – Year ended  

December 31, 2017:

Operating revenues
Depreciation and amortization
Operating income (loss)
Earnings from equity 

method investments

Interest expense
Income taxes(e)
Segment net income (loss)(e)
Gross property additions
Successor – Total assets at 

$ 3,186
409
904

$

32
5
20

$ 144
2
70

$ 568
37
19

$ 3,930 $
453
1,013

—
(178)
409
334
1,429

145
(34)
28
103
32

—
(9)
4
38
—

—
(6)
54
(40)
6

145
(227)
495
435
1,467

55
47
(98)

3
(1)
(31)
(63)
54

$

(76)
—
—

$ 3,909
500
915

—
—
—
—
—

148
(228)
464
372
1,521

17,266

1,763

1,302

1,587

21,918

11,112

(11,582)

21,448

$ 3,207
391
645

$

$

17
2
10

—
(153)
178
353
1,330

103
(26)
109
(22)
117

6
2
(51)

—
(7)
—
(57)
1

$ 860
62
113

$ 4,090 $
457
717

64
44
(57)

$

(234)
—
—

$ 3,920
501
660

—
(5)
24
84
9

103
(191)
311
358
1,457

3
(9)
56
(115)
51

—
—
—
—
—

106
(200)
367
243
1,508

December 31, 2017

19,358

1,699

1,096

2,147

24,300

12,726

(14,039)

22,987

Successor – July 1, 2016  

through December 31, 2016:

Operating revenues
Depreciation and amortization
Operating income (loss)
Earnings from equity 
method investments

Interest expense
Income taxes (benefit)
Segment net income (loss)
Gross property additions
Successor – Total assets at 

$

$ 1,342
185
225

—
(105)
51
77
561

3
—
1

58
(10)
21
29
51

$

24
1
(2)

—
(3)
(3)
—
1

$ 354
35
27

$ 1,723 $
221
251

—
(1)
7
19
5

58
(119)
76
125
618

31
17
(52)

2
38
—
(11)
14

$

(102)
—
—

$ 1,652
238
199

—
—
—
—
—

60
(81)
76
114
632

December 31, 2016

19,453

1,659

1,127

2,084

24,323

11,697

(14,167)

21,853

218

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

Gas  
Distribution  
Operations(a)(b)

Gas  
Pipeline  
Investments

Wholesale  
Gas  
Services(c)

Gas  
Marketing  

Services(b)(d)

Total

(in millions)

All  
Other

Eliminations

Consolidated

Predecessor – January 1, 2016  

through June 30, 2016:

Operating revenues
Depreciation and 

amortization

Operating income (loss)
EBIT
Gross property additions

$1,575

$ 3

$(32)

$435

$1,981

$ 26

$(102)

$1,905

178
353
353
484

—
3
3
40

1
(69)
(68)
1

11
109
109
4

190
396
397
529

16
(73)
(69)
19

—
—
—
—

206
323
328
548

(a)  Operating revenues for the three gas distribution operations dispositions were $244 million, $399 million, and $168 million for the successor years ended 
December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, respectively, and $215 million for the predecessor 
period ended June 30, 2016. See Note 15 under “Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

(b)  Segment net income for gas distribution operations includes a gain on dispositions of $324 million ($16 million after tax) for the year ended 

December 31, 2018. Segment net income for gas marketing services includes a loss on disposition of $(33) million ($(67) million loss after tax) and a 
goodwill impairment charge of $42 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 recorded in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. See 
Note 15 under “Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

(c)  The revenues for wholesale gas services are netted with costs associated with its energy and risk management activities. A reconciliation of operating 

revenues and intercompany revenues is shown in the following table.

Successor – Year Ended December 31, 2018
Successor – Year Ended December 31, 2017
Successor – July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Predecessor – January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016

Third Party  
Gross  
Revenues

$6,955
6,152
5,807
2,500

Intercompany  
Revenues

Total Gross  
Revenues

Less Gross  
Gas Costs

Operating  
Revenues

(in millions)

$451
481
333
143

$7,406
6,633
6,140
2,643

$7,262
6,627
6,116
2,675

$144
6
24
(32)

(d)  Operating revenues for the gas marketing services disposition were $55 million, $129 million, and $56 million for the successor years ended 

December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, respectively, and $64 million for the predecessor 
period ended June 30, 2016 See Note 15 under “Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

(e)  Includes the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation and new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from Southern Company Gas’ 

inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings.

219

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

NOTE 17. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

The tables below provide summarized quarterly financial information for each registrant for 2018 and 2017. Each registrant’s business is 

influenced by seasonal weather conditions.

Quarter Ended

March 2018
Operating Revenues
Operating Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant
June 2018
Operating Revenues
Operating Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant
September 2018
Operating Revenues
Operating Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant
December 2018
Operating Revenues
Operating Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant

Southern  
Company(a)

Alabama  
Power

Georgia 

Power(b)

Mississippi  
Power(c)

Southern  

Power(d)

Southern  
Company  
Gas(e)

(in millions)

$6,372
1,376
936
938

$5,627
63
(127)
(154)

$6,159
2,174
1,222
1,164

$5,337
578
269
278

$1,473
372
225
225

$1,503
380
259
259

$1,740
561
373
373

$1,316
164
73
73

$1,961
513
352
352

$2,048
(472)
(396)
(396)

$2,593
991
664
664

$1,818
257
173
173

$302
7
(7)
(7)

$297
54
46
46

$358
80
47
47

$308
52
149
149

$509
60
115
121

$555
16
45
22

$635
136
146
92

$506
30
(60)
(48)

$1,639
388
279
279

$ 730
49
(31)
(31)

$ 492
374
46
46

$1,048
104
78
78

(a)  See notes (b), (c), (d), and (e) below.
(b)  Georgia Power recorded an estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion in the second quarter 2018 to reflect its revised estimate to complete construction and 

start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. See Note 2 under “Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction” for additional information.

(c)  As a result of the abandonment and related closure activities for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility, Mississippi 
Power recorded total pre-tax charges to income of $44 million ($33 million after tax) in the first quarter 2018, immaterial amounts in the second and 
third quarters 2018, and a pre-tax credit to income of $9 million in the fourth quarter 2018. In addition, Mississippi Power recorded a credit to earnings of 
$95 million in the fourth quarter 2018 primarily resulting from the reduction of a valuation allowance for a state income tax NOL carryforward associated 
with the Kemper County energy facility. See Note 2 under “Mississippi Power – Kemper County Energy Facility” and Note 10 for additional information.
(d)  Southern Power recorded pre-tax impairment charges of $119 million ($89 million after tax) in the second quarter 2018 in contemplation of the sale of the 
Florida Plants and $36 million ($27 million after tax) in the third quarter 2018 related to wind turbine equipment. See Note 15 under “Southern Power – 
Sales of Natural Gas Plants” and “ – Development Projects” for additional information. As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, Southern Power recorded 
income tax expense of $75 million in the fourth quarter 2018. See Note 10 for additional information.

(e)  Southern Company Gas recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million in the first quarter 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home 

Solutions. Southern Company Gas also recorded gains (losses) on dispositions in the second, third, and fourth quarters 2018 of $(36) million pre-tax and 
$(76) million after tax, $353 million pre-tax and $40 million after tax, and $(27) million pre-tax and $(15) million after tax, respectively. See Note 15 under 
“Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

220

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportNotes to Financial Statements 

Quarter Ended

Southern
Company(a)(b)(c)

Alabama 
Power

Georgia
Power

Mississippi 

Power(a)(b)

Southern 
Power(b)

Southern 
Company Gas(b)

(in millions)

March 2017
Operating Revenues
Operating Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant

June 2017
Operating Revenues
Operating Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant

September 2017
Operating Revenues
Operating Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant

December 2017
Operating Revenues
Operating Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant

$ 5,771
1,252
665
658

$ 5,430
(1,649)
(1,348)
(1,381)

$ 6,201
1,991
1,109
1,069

$ 5,629
739
500
496

$ 1,382
361
174
174

$ 1,832
483
260
260

$ 1,484
440
230
230

$ 2,048
621
347
347

$ 1,740
601
325
325

$ 2,546
1,017
580
580

$ 1,433
255
119
119

$ 1,884
452
227
227

$ 272
(64)
(20)
(20)

$ 303
(2,956)
(2,054)
(2,054)

$ 341
49
40
40

$ 271
(180)
(556)
(556)

$450
65
66
70

$529
112
104
82

$618
159
154
124

$478
32
793
795

$ 1,560
389
239
239

$ 716
95
49
49

$ 565
67
15
15

$ 1,079
109
(60)
(60)

(a)  As a result of revisions to the cost estimate for the Kemper IGCC and the project’s June 2017 suspension, Mississippi Power recorded total pre-tax charges 
to income related to the Kemper IGCC of $108 million ($67 million after tax) in the first quarter 2017, $3.0 billion ($2.1 billion after tax) in the second 
quarter 2017, $34 million ($21 million after tax) in the third quarter 2017, and $208 million ($185 million after tax) in the fourth quarter 2017. See Note 2 
under “Mississippi Power – Kemper County Energy Facility” for additional information.

(b)  As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Southern Company system recorded a total income tax benefit of $264 million in the fourth quarter 2017, 

comprised primarily of income tax expense of $372 million recorded at Mississippi Power, income tax benefit of $743 million recorded at Southern Power, 
and income tax expense of $93 million recorded at Southern Company Gas. See Note 10 for additional information.

(c)  Gulf Power recorded a pre-tax charge of $33 million ($20 million after tax) for the write-down of its ownership in Plant Scherer Unit 3 in the first quarter 

2017. See Note 2 under “Southern Company – Gulf Power” for additional information.

Southern Company
The table below provides quarterly per share financial information for Southern Company common stock for 2018 and 2017.

Quarter Ended

March 2018
June 2018
September 2018
December 2018

March 2017
June 2017
September 2017
December 2017

Per Common Share

Basic
Earnings

Diluted 
Earnings

$ 0.93
(0.15)
1.14
0.27

$ 0.66
(1.38)
1.07
0.49

$ 0.92
(0.15)
1.13
0.27

$ 0.66
(1.37)
1.06
0.49

Dividends

$0.5800
0.6000
0.6000
0.6000

$ 0.5600
0.5800
0.5800
0.5800

221

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportSelected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data 2014-2018 

Operating Revenues (in millions)
Total Assets (in millions)(a)
Gross Property Additions (in millions)
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)(b)
Cash Dividends Paid Per Share of Common Stock
Consolidated Net Income Attributable to  

Southern Company (in millions)(b)

Earnings Per Share —

Basic
Diluted

Capitalization (in millions):
Common stockholders' equity
Preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries and

 noncontrolling interests
Redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
Long-term debt(a)(c)
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)(c)
Capitalization Ratios (percent):
Common stockholders' equity
Preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries and  

noncontrolling interests

Redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
Long-term debt(a)(c)
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)(c)
Other Common Stock Data:
Book value per share
Market price per share:

High
Low
Close (year-end)

Market-to-book ratio (year-end) (percent)
Price-earnings ratio (year-end) (times)
Dividends paid (in millions)
Dividend yield (year-end) (percent)
Dividend payout ratio (percent)
Shares outstanding (in thousands):

Average
Year-end

Stockholders of record (year-end)

2018
$
23,495
$ 116,914
8,205
$
9.11
2.3800
2,226

$
$

2017
$
23,031
$ 111,005
5,984
$
3.44
2.3000
842

$
$

2016(d)

$ 19,896
$109,697
7,624
$
10.80
$ 2.2225
2,448
$

2015
$ 17,489
$ 78,318
6,169
$
11.68
$ 2.1525
2,367
$

2014
$ 18,467
$ 70,233
6,522
$
10.08
$ 2.0825
1,963
$

$

$

$

$

$

$

2.18
2.17

24,723
4,316

291
—
40,736
70,066

35.3
6.2

0.4
—
58.1
100.0

23.91

49.43
42.38
43.92
183.7
20.1
2,425
5.4
108.9

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

0.84
0.84

2.57
2.55

$

$

2.60
2.59

2.19
2.18

24,167
1,361

$ 24,758
1,854

$ 20,592
1,390

$ 19,949
977

324
—
44,462
70,314

118
164
42,629
$ 69,523

118
43
24,688
$ 46,831

375
39
20,644
$ 41,984

34.4
1.9

0.5
—
63.2
100.0

23.99

53.51
46.71
48.09
200.5
57.3
2,300
4.8
273.2

35.6
2.7

0.2
0.2
61.3
100.0

25.00

54.64
46.00
49.19
196.8
19.1
2,104
4.5
86.0

$

$

$

44.0
3.0

0.3
0.1
52.6
100.0

22.59

53.16
41.40
46.79
207.2
18.0
1,959
4.6
82.7

$

$

$

47.5
2.3

0.9
0.1
49.2
100.0

21.98

51.28
40.27
49.11
223.4
22.4
1,866
4.2
95.0

$

$

$

1,020,247
1,033,788
116,135

1,000,336
1,007,603
120,803

951,332
990,394
126,338

910,024
911,721
131,771

897,194
907,777
137,369

(a)  A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $202 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total 

Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $488 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and 
applied retrospectively.

(b)  Georgia Power recorded a pre-tax estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018 to reflect its revised estimate 
to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In addition, a significant loss to income was recorded by Mississippi Power related to 
the suspension of the Kemper IGCC in June 2017. Earnings in all periods presented were impacted by losses related to the Kemper IGCC. See Note 2 to the 
financial statements for additional information.

(c)  Amounts related to Gulf Power have been reclassified to liabilities held for sale at December 31, 2018. See Note 15 to the financial statements under 

“Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power” for additional information.

(d)  The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through 

December 31, 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

222

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportSelected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data 2014-2018 (continued)

Operating Revenues (in millions):
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other
Total retail
Wholesale
Total revenues from sales of electricity
Natural gas revenues
Other revenues
Total
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other
Total retail
Wholesale sales
Total
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Total retail
Wholesale
Total sales
Average Annual Kilowatt-Hour
Use Per Residential Customer

Average Annual Revenue

Per Residential Customer
Plant Nameplate Capacity

Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)

Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):
Winter
Summer
System Reserve Margin (at peak) (percent)
Annual Load Factor (percent)
Plant Availability (percent):
Fossil-steam
Nuclear

2018

2017

2016(a)

2015

2014

$ 6,608
5,266
3,224
124
15,222
2,516
17,738
3,854
1,903
$ 23,495

54,590
53,451
53,341
799
162,181
49,963
212,144

12.10
9.85
6.04
9.39
5.04
8.36

$ 6,515
5,439
3,262
114
15,330
2,426
17,756
3,791
1,484
$ 23,031

50,536
52,340
52,785
846
156,507
49,034
205,541

12.89
10.39
6.18
9.80
4.95
8.64

$ 6,614
5,394
3,171
55
15,234
1,926
17,160
1,596
1,140
$ 19,896

53,337
53,733
52,792
883
160,745
37,043
197,788

12.40
10.04
6.01
9.48
5.20
8.68

$ 6,383
5,317
3,172
115
14,987
1,798
16,785
—
704
$ 17,489

52,121
53,525
53,941
897
160,484
30,505
190,989

12.25
9.93
5.88
9.34
5.89
8.79

$

6,499
5,469
3,449
133
15,550
2,184
17,734
—
733
$ 18,467

53,347
53,243
54,140
909
161,639
32,786
194,425

12.18
10.27
6.37
9.62
6.66
9.12

12,514

11,618

12,387

13,318

13,765

$ 1,555

$ 1,498

$ 1,541

$ 1,630

$

1,679

45,824

46,936

46,291

44,223

46,549

36,429
34,841
29.8
61.2

81.4
94.0

31,956
34,874
30.8
61.4

84.5
94.7

32,272
35,781
34.2
61.5

86.4
93.3

36,794
36,195
33.2
59.9

86.1
93.5

37,234
35,396
19.8
59.6

85.8
91.5

(a)  The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through 

December 31, 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

223

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportSelected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data 2014-2018 (continued)

Source of Energy Supply (percent):
Gas
Coal
Nuclear
Hydro
Other
Purchased power
Total
Gas Sales Volumes (mmBtu in millions):
Firm
Interruptible
Total
Traditional Electric Operating Company 

Customers (year-end) (in thousands):

Residential
Commercial(b)
Industrial(b)
Other
Total electric customers
Gas distribution operations customers
Total utility customers
Employees (year-end)

2018

41.6
27.0
13.8
2.9
5.4
9.3
100.0

791
109
900

4,053
603
17
12
4,685
4,248
8,933
30,286

2017

41.9
27.0
14.5
2.1
5.4
9.1
100.0

729
109
838

4,011
599
18
12
4,640
4,623
9,263
31,344

2016(a)

41.7
30.3
14.5
2.1
2.4
9.0
100.0

296
53
349

3,970
595
17
11
4,593
4,586
9,179
32,015

2015

42.7
32.3
15.2
2.6
0.8
6.4
100.0

—
—
—

3,928
590
17
11
4,546
—
4,546
26,703

2014

37.0
39.3
14.8
2.5
0.4
6.0
100.0

—
—
—

3,890
586
17
11
4,504
—
4,504
26,369

(a)  The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through 

December 31, 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under “Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas” for additional information.

(b)  A reclassification of customers from commercial to industrial is reflected for years 2014-2015 to be consistent with the rate structure approved by the 

Georgia PSC. The impact to operating revenues, kilowatt-hour sales, and average revenue per kilowatt-hour by class is not material.

224

Southern Company 2018 Annual ReportShareholder Information

Transfer Agent 

Investor Information 

EQ Shareowner Services is Southern Company’s transfer agent, 

For information about earnings and dividends, stock  

dividend-paying agent, investment plan administrator and registrar. 

If you have questions concerning your registered Southern Company 

quotes and current news releases, please visit us at  
investor.southerncompany.com. 

shareowner account, please contact:

EQ Shareowner Services

1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101

Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120

Telephone: 1.800.554.7626
Website: shareowneronline.com

Southern Company Shareholder Relations 

Telephone: 404.506.0965

Institutional Investor Inquiries 

Southern Company maintains an investor relations office in  

Atlanta, Georgia, 404.506.0901, to meet the information needs  

of institutional investors and securities analysts. 

Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials 

Any stockholder may enroll for electronic delivery of proxy  
materials by logging on at www.icsdelivery.com/so.

Email: shareholderservices@southernco.com

Environmental Information 

Southern Investment Plan 

The Southern Investment Plan is a convenient way to become 

a Southern Company shareholder. Participants in the Plan can 

purchase additional shares in Southern Company through optional 

Southern Company publishes information on its activities to meet 
environmental commitments at www.southerncompany.com/
corporate-responsibility. 

To request printed materials, write to: 

cash purchases and reinvestment of dividends. The Southern 

Director, Environmental Affairs 

Investment Plan prospectus can be found at  
www.southerncompany.com.

Dividend Payments 

Research and Environmental Affairs  

600 North 18th St. 

Bin 14N-8195 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2206 

Southern Company has paid dividends since 1948. Historically, 

dividends are declared and paid quarterly at the discretion of  

Common Stock 

the Board of Directors. 

Annual Meeting 

Southern Company common stock is listed on the NYSE under the 

ticker symbol SO. On December 31, 2018, Southern Company had 

116,135 shareholders of record. 

The 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held Wednesday, 

May 22, at 10 a.m. ET at The Lodge Conference Center at Callaway 

The 2018 annual report is submitted for shareholders’ information. 

Gardens, 4500 Southern Pine Drive, Pine Mountain, Ga. 31822. 

It is not intended for use in connection with any sale or purchase 

Auditors 

Deloitte & Touche LLP  

191 Peachtree St. NE  

Suite 2000  

Atlanta, GA 30303 

of, or any solicitation of, offers to buy or sell securities. 

Visit our website at www.southerncompany.com

Visit our Corporate Responsibility Report at 
www.southerncompany.com/corporate-responsibility 

Follow us on Twitter at www.twitter.com/southerncompany

l

r
e
d
n
a
x
e
A
y
d
n
a
S

:

g
n
i
t
n
i
r
P
k
r
i
K
r
e
t
l
a
W

:

o
t
o
h
P
6
e
g
a
P
f
p
e
n
h
c
S
s
e
m
a
J

:

y
h
p
a
r
g
o
t
o
h
P
s
n
o
i
t
a
c
i
n
u
m
m
o
C
p
a
e
L

:

n
g
i
s
e
D
m
u

l
l

o
C
c
M

l
l

e
r
r
e
T
:
t
n
e
m
e
g
a
n
a
M

t
c
e
j
o
r
P
d
n
a
g
n
i
t
i
r

W

Contents 1 Chairman’s Message 3 Financial Highlights 4 A Culture of Innovation 6 Focused on Fundamentals 8 Leadership 10 Financial ReviewThomas A. FanningChairman, President & CEO, Southern Company 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Energy for Life

2018 Annual Report

S
o
u
t
h
e
r
n
C
o
m
p
a
n
y

2
0
1
8
A
n
n
u
a

l

R
e
p
o
r
t

SouthernCompany.com