Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Oil & Gas Equipment & Services / The Weir Group

The Weir Group

weir · LSE Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker weir
Exchange LSE
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2019 Annual Report · The Weir Group
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
The Weir Group PLC 
Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

FINANCIAL AND NON-FINANCIAL SUMMARY

ORDERS

£2.8bn

+8%6

2.4

2.5
256m

2.8

557m

1.9

1.9

TOTAL INCIDENT RATE3

0.49

+40% underlying  
improvement

0.60

0.60

0.53

0.22

0.45

0.27

ESCO

ESCO

20152

20162

20172

20181

20191

20152

20162

20172

20181

20191

REVENUE

£2.7bn

+7%6

2.4

2.5
252m

2.7

572m

1.9

1.9

REVENUES FROM NEW SOLUTIONS5

£177m

+8%

168

165

177

110

ESCO

20152

20162

20172

20181

20191

N/A
2015

20162

20172

20181

20191

ADJUSTED PROFIT BEFORE TAX1,4

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

£303m

-2%
REPORTED LOSS 
BEFORE TAX1

(£372m)

-532%

310

303

7.9/10

Employee NPS score

7.9

250

220

170

20152

20162

20172

20181

20191

N/A

2015

N/A

2016

N/A

2017

N/A

2018

2019

1  Continuing operations.

2  Total operations.

3  Total incident rate is an industry standard safety indicator that measures lost time  

and recordable incidents per 200,000 hours worked. 2018 and prior years exclude ESCO.

4  Adjusted to exclude exceptional items and intangibles amortisation (note 2).

5  Defined as revenues from new products introduced in the last three years.

6  2018 restated at 2019 average exchange rates.

For more information visit our website 
www.global.weir 

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

IN THIS REPORT

WHAT’S DRIVING 
OUR MARKETS?
READ MORE 
PAGES 8-9

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S 
STRATEGIC REVIEW
READ MORE 
PAGES 16-21

SUSTAINABILITY  
OVERVIEW
READ MORE 
PAGE 60

ZERO TIR

ENABLING
NET ZERO

LEADING
eNPS SCORE

50%
REDUCTION
IN CO2e 
BY 2030

Strategic Report

‘We are Weir’  
Our Business at a Glance  
Our Markets 
Chairman’s Statement  
Our Business Model  
Chief Executives Strategic Review  
Our Key Performance Indicators  
Section 172 Statement  
Chairman and CEO Q&A 
Financial Review  
Operational Review  
Risk Management  
Principal Risks and Uncertainties 
Sustainability Review  
Non-financial Reporting 

Corporate Governance

Chairman’s Introduction 
Board of Directors  
Group Executive  
Governance Framework  
Division of Responsibilities 
Senior Independent Director Overview 
Board Meetings  
Board Inductions, Duties and Re-election 
Board Activities  
Engagement with our Shareholders 
Governance in Action  
Effectiveness and Evaluation 
Board Statements 
First Year as Non-Executive  
Accountability  
Viability Statement  
Nomination Committee Report  
Audit Committee Report  
Directors’ Remuneration Report 
Directors’ Report 
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 

Financial Statements

2
6
8
10
14
16
22
26
28
32
38
50
54
60
70

73
74
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
94
102 
126
129

Independent auditors’ report to the members of The Weir Group PLC  130
138
Consolidated Income Statement 
139
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 
140
Consolidated Balance Sheet 
141
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 
142
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 
144
Notes to the Group Financial Statements  
199
Company Balance Sheet 
200
Company Statement of Changes in Equity 
201
Notes to the Company Financial Statements 

Additional Information

Subsidiary Undertakings 
Shareholder Information 
Glossary 

216
224
227

1

SOLUTIONSCREATING SUSTAINABLEFOOTPRINTREDUCING OURZERO HARMCHAMPIONINGNURTURING OURUNIQUE CULTURE 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

OUR ‘WE ARE WEIR’ STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK
MAKING OUR BUSINESS TRULY DISTINCTIVE

Our ‘We are Weir’ strategic framework is a simple guide to what makes 
Weir unique. It includes a clear purpose, sets out our strategic priorities,  
beliefs, way of working and how we deliver value for our stakeholders. 

E
C
N
A
M
R
O

F

R

E

P

We deliver excellence 
for all of our stakeholders, 
through strong leadership, 
performance culture 
and rigorous standards 
of governance.

We are a global family. 
We are proud of our unique 
blend of talent, technology 
and culture. We are here to 
inspire you to do the best 
work of your life.

PEOPL E

here to enable the 
sustainable and efficient 
delivery of the natural 
resources essential to 
create a better future  
for the world

C U STOMER

We will be the most 
admired business in  
our sector. Working in 
partnership, we deliver  
distinctive solutions and  
compelling value.

2

We shape the next 
generation of smart, efficient, 
sustainable solutions with 
cutting-edge science and 
tradition of innovation.

T

E

C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

TO UNDERSTAND MORE ABOUT HOW 
WE ARE DELIVERING OUR STRATEGY: 
SEE PAGES 16-25

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

WE BELIEVE IN

S

T

A

H

F

I

N

Y
O

D

E

U

L

R

I

D

R

I

O

G

I

G

N

C

H

H

E

T

Y

K

I
N

G

 FIRST

U

S

T

TING
MER

O

T

 T

G

 T
HIN

HE
G

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

R

E

E

S

A

P

C

E

H

C

O

T

H

TING
ER

A

I

M

I

N

G

HIGH

TO UNDERSTAND MORE ABOUT  
HOW WE LIVE OUR VALUES: 
SEE PAGES 36-37

WE WORK THIS WAY

•  We always seek to improve and innovate.

•  We care for, challenge and encourage each other.

•  We’re passionately, authentically ourselves.

•  We work together to enhance our global communities.

•  We speak up and take ownership for our shared success.

•  We can’t wait. 

TO UNDERSTAND MORE ABOUT  
HOW WE OPERATE AS A BUSINESS: 
SEE PAGES 14-15

WE DELIVER

TO UNDERSTAND MORE ABOUT  
THE VALUE WE DELIVER: 
SEE PAGES 30-31

R I T I C A L
N S
N-C
LU TI O
SIO
O
IS
S
M

A
F

T

I

E

N

R

T

M

E

N

A

R

K

E

SIVE
T CARE

HIGHLY E

EQ

N

U

IP

G

I

M

N

E

E

N

E

T

R

E
D

E
V
T
SI
R
O
N
P

R E HE
L S UP

A

C O M P
G L O B

3

 
 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

‘WE ARE WEIR’ HIGHLIGHTS FROM 2019

MAKING 
OUR PEOPLE  
CO-OWNERS

We launched Weir ShareBuilder, 
one of the most comprehensive 
employee share plans in the world, 
giving all our people the opportunity 
to become co-owners of our business.

c.12,000

colleagues granted share awards in 2019

READ MORE 
PAGE 12 

MORE SUSTAINABLE MINING

The Minerals Division was awarded 
a record £100m order to provide  
energy-saving technology to the Iron 
Bridge magnetite project in Western 
Australia. The solution is 30% more 
efficient than legacy systems. 

30%

energy saving

READ MORE 
PAGE 30

4

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

INSPIRING INNOVATION

We established the Weir Innovation 
Network asking all our employees to help 
solve some of our customers’ toughest 
challenges. Our first winner, Peter Pavlin, 
suggested a solution that could reduce 
environmental waste in oil sands projects. 
READ MORE 
PAGE 65

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

TAKING PEOPLE OUT 
OF HARM’S WAY

The ESCO Division developed a toolhead  
which automates ground engaging tools 
change-outs. This removes people from 
one of the most hazardous parts of a mine. 

READ MORE 
PAGE 42

LAUNCH OF ELECTRIC 
FRACK PUMP

The Oil & Gas Division launched the 
SPM® QEM 5000, its first electric-compatible 
frack pump. It uses proven technology 
to enable an alternative to diesel fuelled 
pumping solutions and can reduce the 
footprint of fracking operations by 60%. 

60%

footprint reduction 

READ MORE 
PAGE 48

5

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

OUR BUSINESS AT A GLANCE

GLOBAL CAPABILITY AND LOCAL DELIVERY
Our Group is made up of three divisions that operate in natural resource markets.  
Each has leading brands used in high abrasion applications and operate  
an aftermarket-focused business model.

GROUP REVENUES BY DIVISION %

ORDERS BY OE/AM % 

MINING REVENUES BY COMMODITY %

 Minerals 

 ESCO 

 Oil & Gas 

56%

21%

23%

 Aftermarket (AM) 

77%

  Original  
equipment (OE) 

23%

 Copper 

 Iron Ore 

 Gold 

 Oil & Gas 

 Coal 

 Other 

28%

14%

14%

11%

10%

23%

TOTAL PEOPLE

EMPLOYEES BY GEOGRAPHY %

GROUP ORDERS BY GEOGRAPHY %

c.15,000

OPERATING COUNTRIES

50+

 North America 

 Asia Pacific 

 Europe 

 South America 

39%

12%

12%

15%

 Middle East & Africa  13%

 Australia 

9%

 North America 

 Asia Pacific 

 Europe 

 South America 

38%

10%

9%

16%

 Middle East & Africa  13%

 Australia 

14%

Minerals location

 Minerals location 

ESCO location

 ESCO location

 Oil & Gas location

Oil & Gas location

  Weir Group Global HQ 
(Glasgow) 

Weir Group Global HQ (Glasgow)

6

WEIR 
MINERALS

WEIR 
ESCO

WEIR  
OIL & GAS

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

WHAT WE DO
Weir Minerals’ products and technology 
are used in mining, oil and gas and general 
industrial markets around the world. 
Common applications include; mining & 
minerals processing (including comminution), 
slurry transportation and mine dewatering, 
and oil sands.

MARKET POSITIONS 
Minerals is a global leader in the provision 
of mill circuit technology and services as 
well as the market leader in slurry-handling 
equipment and associated aftermarket 
support for abrasive high-wear applications. 
Its differentiated technology is used in 
mining, infrastructure, oil and gas and general 
industrial markets around the world.

WHAT WE DO
ESCO provides highly engineered ground 
engaging tools (G.E.T) used in global mining 
and infrastructure markets. Its equipment is 
mission critical to the efficient extraction and 
transport of materials. 

 MARKET POSITIONS 
ESCO is the global leader in G.E.T for large 
mining machines. The division also applies 
its differentiated technology to infrastructure 
markets including construction, dredging and 
sand and aggregates. 

WHAT WE DO
Weir Oil & Gas provides highly engineered 
mission-critical solutions to upstream 
energy markets. Products include pressure 
pumping and pressure control equipment, 
supported by Weir EDGE aftermarket 
spares, equipment repairs, upgrades, 
certification and asset management, 
and field services to customers around 
the world.

MARKET POSITIONS
Weir Oil & Gas is a global leader in the 
provision of pressure pumping solutions 
for shale operations and has a developing 
presence in pressure control markets.

7

ADDRESSABLE MARKET £m

c.£7-8bn

2019 REVENUE1 £m

£1,478m

+4%

2019 ADJUSTED OPERATING PROFIT1 £m

£270m

+7%

1  2018 restated at 2019 average exchange rates

ADDRESSABLE MARKET £m

c.£2.5bn

2019 REVENUE1,2 £m

£572m

+4%

2019 ADJUSTED OPERATING PROFIT1,2 £m

£83m

+25%
1   2018 restated at 2019 average exchange rates 

2   ESCO on proforma basis for 2018

ADDRESSABLE MARKET £m

c.£5-6bn

2019 REVENUE1 £m

£612m

-25%

2019 ADJUSTED OPERATING PROFIT1 £m

£37m

-64%

1   2018 restated at 2019 average exchange rates

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

OUR MARKETS: ALIGNED TO LONG-TERM  
STRUCTURAL GROWTH

DEMAND SUPPORTED BY GLOBAL MEGA-TRENDS

ALIGNING OUR STRATEGY TO 
LONG-TERM FUNDAMENTALS
Our ‘We are Weir’ strategic framework is 
designed to fulfil our purpose which is to 
‘enable the sustainable and efficient delivery 
of the natural resources essential to create a 
better future for the world’. That purpose has 
been specifically chosen to address some of 
the biggest challenges in our markets, from 
increasing productivity to support growing 
demand for commodities like copper, to 
reducing the environmental impact of both 
our operations and those of our customers. 
You can read more in the CEO statement 
on page 16.

While our markets are underpinned by 
long-term fundamentals, they are also 
cyclical. We seek to mitigate this through 
our aftermarket-focused business model. 
It concentrates the Group on mission-critical 
high abrasion applications that provide 
ongoing demand for higher margin spares and 
services. This robust model is also supported 
by industry-specific trends such as ore grade 
declines in mining that mean more rock needs 
to be processed to produce the same amount 
of ore, increasing the wear on our equipment 
and subsequently generating higher 
aftermarket demand. You can read more on 
our business model on page 14 including 
how we translate these market trends into 
sustainable value for our stakeholders.

WE BELIEVE THE 
SINGLE MOST 
SIGNIFICANT 
CONTRIBUTION 
WE CAN MAKE TO 
SUSTAINABILITY 
IS THROUGH 
INNOVATION. 

JON STANTON
Chief Executive Officer

STRUCTURAL TREND

GLOBAL POPULATION AND 
MIGRATION TRENDS
In 2019 the UN estimated there were 
approximately 7.7bn people on earth. By 2030 
they project that number will rise to 8.5bn, 
and by 2050, almost 10 billion people.

Meanwhile, increased urbanisation means the 
number of people living in cities is expected 
to rise from c.50% to c.66% by 2050.

CLIMATE CHANGE
There is increased demand for commodities 
that enable the world to move towards lower 
carbon sources of energy and transport 
including renewables and electric vehicles. 
Increasingly, natural resources producers are 
focusing on sustainability by reducing their 
environmental footprint and improving safety.

TECHNOLOGY ACCELERATION
There is a growing focus in our markets 
on automation and digitisation to support 
safety, productivity and sustainability. 
Our customers are looking to their 
technology partners to help them adapt 
and transform their operations to take 
advantage of these advances.

GLOBALISATION
The global economy continues to grow but 
the benefits of increased globalisation are 
being called into question. This has been 
reflected in the recent trade wars between 
the USA and China. There is also a continuing 
debate about the role of businesses in society 
and how they generate value for a broad 
range of stakeholders.

8

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

STRUCTURAL TREND

HOW WE ARE  
RESPONDING

CASE STUDIES

We serve markets that support global growth 
by providing the natural resources needed 
to build homes, cities, transportation and 
energy networks. Our technology helps 
customers operate more efficiently, enabling 
them to meet increased demand through 
improved productivity.

READ MORE 
PAGES 38-49

Weir equipment is used to process the majority 
of the world’s mined copper, giving us an 
important role in making the industry more 
sustainable. That is reflected in our technology 
agenda which is focused on smarter, more 
efficient solutions that reduce energy, water 
and waste. 

READ MORE 
PAGES 60-71

We are developing digital solutions that use 
big data, artificial intelligence and sensing 
technology to improve performance and 
automation to increase safety for our customers. 
We are also deploying advanced manufacturing 
technologies to improve our product 
development and operational excellence. 

READ MORE 
PAGES 38-49

Our geographic and market diversity provide 
increased protection from political uncertainty 
while our ‘We are Weir’ strategy makes clear our 
commitment to delivering excellent outcomes 
for a range of stakeholders including making our 
employees co-owners of our business.

READ MORE 
PAGES 2-3

9

SEE HOW OUR ESCO DIVISION’S N70 
TECHNOLOGY IS SUPPORTING MINERS 
TO PRODUCE ORE FOR A LOWER TOTAL 
COST ON PAGE 45

SEE HOW WE ARE REDUCING FRACKING 
OPERATIONS DEPENDENCE ON DIESEL-
POWERED OPERATIONS ON PAGE 48

YOU CAN ALSO READ OUR SUSTAINABILITY 
STRATEGY ON PAGE 60 AND HOW WE 
MANAGE RISKS ON PAGE 50

SEE HOW WE ARE USING AUTOMATION 
TO MAKE GET MAINTENANCE SAFER AND 
MORE EFFICIENT ON PAGE 43 

READ MORE ABOUT OUR TECHNOLOGY 
ADVANCES IN THE OPERATIONAL REVIEWS 
FROM PAGE 38

READ ABOUT OUR COMPREHENSIVE SHARE 
PLAN TO MAKE OUR PEOPLE CO-OWNERS 
OF OUR BUSINESS FROM PAGE 12 

YOU CAN ALSO SEE HOW WE MANAGE 
RISKS FROM PAGE 50

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT

MAKING A POSITIVE DIFFERENCE  
TO OUR STAKEHOLDERS

DEAR SHAREHOLDER, 
2019 saw your business make strong 
progress in our mining-focused divisions, 
which represent 77% of revenues. The  
integration of ESCO, our largest ever 
acquisition, was a real highlight. Change can 
often be disruptive but the ESCO integration 
was completed ahead of schedule while 
delivering good growth and excellent 
employee satisfaction. It means that Weir’s 
mining-focused divisions now generate 
more than £2bn in revenues with c.80% 
of those from recurring aftermarket 
sales, underlining our positive belief in the 
long-term fundamentals of mining markets. 
Conditions in unconventional oil and gas 
markets, which represent 23% of revenues, 
were challenging as oil producers in North 
America significantly reduced activity to 
conserve cash rather than invest in growth. 
I would like to thank all of our people for 
their hard work and commitment in 2019. 

A CLEAR PURPOSE
With ESCO’s strong market position in 
extraction and Minerals leadership positions 
in comminution and mill circuit technology, 
the Group is now uniquely placed as the only 
provider of premium mining solutions from pit 
to processing, making us even more relevant 
to mining customers.

That is particularly important as we look to the 
long-term. As the world continues to develop 
and grow, demand for essential resources 
like copper will continue to increase. 
Miners are under enormous pressure to 
reduce energy, water and waste and they 
are looking to technology partners like Weir 
to help. That is why sustainability is at the 
heart of our strategy and why our purpose 
is ‘to enable the sustainable and efficient 
delivery of the natural resources essential to 
create a better future for the world’. 

That reflects our role in making our 
customers more productive while reducing 
their environmental impact as evidenced by 
our record £100m order for energy-saving 
High Pressure Grinding Rolls technology, 
which you can read more about on page 31. 

WEIR IS A VALUES-
LED BUSINESS THAT 
BENEFITS FROM A 
STRONG CULTURE 
OF CONTINUOUS 
IMPROVEMENT AND 
INNOVATION. 

CHARLES BERRY
Chairman

CHARLES BERRY
Chairman

The Board at a Weir Minerals facility 
in Chile

10

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

It also reflects our commitment to building 
a business that is relentlessly future-focused, 
with a clear vision of its role in the world, 
as Jon Stanton sets out from page 16. 

FINANCIAL RESULTS
Reported revenues increased to £2,662m, 
up 9%. On a constant currency like-
for-like basis, revenues were down 6% 
reflecting oil and gas market conditions. 
Pre-tax profits from continuing operations, 
before exceptional items and intangibles 
amortisation, of £303m represent a 2% 
decrease from the previous year. The reported 
loss after tax of £353m from continuing 
operations was primarily driven by the 
£546m Oil & Gas impairment, reflecting 
ongoing market dynamics in North America. 
You can read more in the Financial Review on 
page 32. We are proposing a final dividend 
payment of 30.45p per share, making 46.95p 
for the full year – the 36th year of stable or 
growing dividends. 

A STRONG CULTURE OF CHALLENGE 
AND COLLABORATION
Weir is a values-led business that benefits 
from a strong culture of continuous 
improvement and innovation. We expect and 
encourage open challenge and together take 
responsibility for our shared success. We are 
proactive in listening to and learning from 
our stakeholders and we use their insights to 
inform the Board’s deliberations. You can read 
more on page 84.

To further enhance our employee voice 
activities, Mary Jo Jacobi was appointed 
as the designated Non-Executive Director 
responsible for employee engagement. 
We introduced a new programme of ‘Meet 
the Board’ sessions, the first of which 
were held in the United States and Chile 
during 2019. These gave employees a direct 
opportunity to have face-to-face discussions 
with Board members and to share their 
views on the topics most important to 
them. This also allowed the Board to gain 
key insights about life as a Weir employee. 
You can learn more about these efforts on 
page 85. In addition to ‘Meet the Board’,  
Non-Executive Directors undertook individual 
visits to facilities in Dubai and Venlo.

In addition to putting sustainability at the 
heart of our purpose and strategy we also 
work hard to ensure we make a positive 
difference to the communities we operate 
in. This includes promoting STEM education 
from primary to secondary education, 
apprenticeships, direct and indirect 
employment, working with local charities and 
many more initiatives across the world that 
recognise the need for companies like Weir 
to play our part in inclusive growth. 

11

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

ALIGNING OUR PEOPLE AND 
INVESTORS’ INTERESTS
We were delighted to give every eligible 
employee a greater stake in the business 
with the introduction of the Weir ShareBuilder 
programme. It is one of the most 
comprehensive employee share plans in the 
world and gives our people in more than 50 
countries the opportunity to build a long-term 
holding in the Group. It was challenging to 
implement as in many countries there is no 
culture of employee share ownership, but 
we worked with local authorities to create 
solutions that ensured that in every country 
that it was possible to gift shares, we did so, 
and in the single example where that wasn’t 
possible we provided cash equivalents to 
compensate. This is an important initiative in 
aligning everyone to our strategy and through 
the gifting of free initial shares, promoting 
inclusion so that everyone can benefit from 
Weir’s long-term success. 

BOARD AND GOVERNANCE 
CHANGES
As previously announced, Rick Menell will 
step down as a Non-Executive Director 
after the 2020 AGM. Rick has made a major 
contribution to the Board in his 11-year tenure 
including serving as Senior Independent 
Director from February 2015 to January 
2020 when he was succeeded by Barbara 
Jeremiah. On behalf of the Board and 
everyone at Weir I would like to thank Rick for 
his hard work and wise counsel and wish him 
every success in the future.

The Board was also strengthened with the 
appointment of Ebbie Haan in February of 
2019. Ebbie has extensive experience leading 
global businesses in extractive industries 
including Royal Dutch Shell plc, Sasol Group 
and Maersk.

Looking ahead to the rest of 2020 the 
Board will continue to focus on supporting 
Jon Stanton and the rest of the team 
as they execute our strategy and build an 
ever-stronger Weir.

CHARLES BERRY
Chairman

READ MORE IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Report 
Our Board of Directors 
Our Group Executive 
Nomination Committee Report 
Audit Committee Report 
Remuneration Committee Report 
Directors’ Report 

73
74
76
91
94
102
126

WE 
Everything  
we do as a 
BELIEVE 
company  
IN
stems from  
our core values:

O
Y
O
U

D

E

U
R

D

L

R

E

I

C

L

G

I
G

H

U

C

S
U

T
S

O
T

H

T

TING
ERS
MER

O
M

‘

S
S

T

A
A

H

T

F

F

I

H

E
E

T
T

N

I
K
N

Y
Y

I
K
N

 FIR
G
 FIRST
ST’

D

R

I

D
O

Q
G

E

I

U

H

L

N

I

T
A

V
G

 T
E
 T
LIT
HIN
Y

R
HE
G

A

I

R

M

D

I

G

I

O

N

H

 T

G

T

 T

H

E
HIN

HIGH

G

R

A

E
N

E

E

S

X

A

D

P

P

C

I

E

L

H

N

C

O

N
O

O
T

V
H

R

TING
E
ATE
ER

 A facility tour in October 2019

 
 
 
 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report
Strategic Report

CO-OWNERS  
OF OUR  
BUSINESS

12

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

In June 2019, the Group launched one of the 
world’s most ambitious and comprehensive 
employee share plans: Weir ShareBuilder. 

The premise behind the plan was to:

•   Make every employee a shareholder and give them a way 

to build up long-term share ownership.

•   Reinforce our ‘We are Weir’ culture and increase 

employee engagement.

•   Provide one common benefit for all employees.

In 2019, all eligible employees received £300 of free shares, 
with the same to follow in 2020, and for all new hires thereafter.

At Weir, we believe that we will achieve great things if we 
can combine our common goals as set out in our ‘We are 
Weir’ framework with the uniqueness that each of us bring 
as individuals. By giving all eligible employees their own 
shares in Weir at no cost it means that whatever role they play, 
in whatever part of the business, and wherever they are in the 
world, they can help shape our future together. 

Image: Colleagues all across the globe were 
awarded an initial share award to the value 
of £300 in 2019

WEIR HAS ALWAYS FELT 
LIKE A GLOBAL FAMILY BUT 
THAT FEELING IS EVEN 
STRONGER,NOW THAT WE 
ARE ALL CO-OWNERS OF 
OUR BUSINESS.

NYAMSUREN ARIUNBUYAN
Weir Minerals Service Centre Manager, Mongolia

13

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

OUR BUSINESS MODEL

OUR PURPOSE
To enable the sustainable and efficient delivery of the natural resources  
essential to create a better future for the world.

KEY RESOURCES WE RELY ON

WHAT WE DO?

We want to deliver excellent outcomes for 
all our stakeholders but to achieve that aim 
we rely on a number of resources. These are 
transformed into tangible outcomes by our 
aftermarket-focused business model.

PEOPLE
Highly engaged people with c.15,000 
colleagues around the world.

FINANCE
Support from Shareholders and debt 
investors to provide the capital to invest in 
growth initiatives.

GOODS & SERVICES
The reliable supply of raw materials and 
support services that enable efficient 
business operations.

COMMUNITIES & INFRASTRUCTURE
We rely on local communities to provide 
highly-skilled employees, protect 
innovation with strong laws and enable our 
products to get to our customers using 
good infrastructure. 

What we do is driven by our purpose and informed by our core values. All three divisions 
operate an installed base of highly engineered original equipment that is used in abrasive 
operating environments. This, in turn, drives demand for aftermarket spares and services, 
providing resilience through the cycle.

R I T I C A L
N S
N-C
LU TI O
SIO
O
IS
S
M

A
F

T

I

E

N

R

T

M

E

N

HIGHLY E

EQ

N

U

IP

G

I

M

N

E

E

N

E

T

R

E
D

E
V
T
SI
R
O
N
P

R E HE
L S UP

A

A

R

K

E

SIVE
T CARE

C O M P
G L O B

HIGHLY 
ENGINEERED 
EQUIPMENT 
We produce 
highly engineered  
equipment that 
is designed to 
solve some of our 
customers toughest 
operating challenges.

MISSION- 
CRITICAL 
SOLUTIONS
Our equipment is 
mission-critical to our 
customers. If it fails, 
their production can 
stop, making us vital 
technology partners. 

INTENSIVE 
AFTERMARKET 
CARE
Our technology is 
used in high abrasion 
applications such 
as crushing rock 
that generates 
recurring demand for 
aftermarket spares 
and services.

COMPREHENSIVE 
GLOBAL SUPPORT
Our customers rely 
on us to provide them 
with the technology 
they need quickly and 
efficiently, supported 
by our global 
service network. 

14

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

WHAT MAKES US UNIQUE

THE LONG-TERM VALUE WE CREATE

PEOPLE
We are a global family. We are 
proud of our unique blend of 
talent, technology and culture. 
We inspire our people to do the 
best work of their lives. 

CUSTOMERS
We aim to be the most admired 
business in our sector by 
working in partnership with 
customers to deliver distinctive 
solutions and compelling value.

TECHNOLOGY
We shape the next generation 
of smart, efficient and 
sustainable solutions with 
cutting-edge science and 
tradition of innovation.

PERFORMANCE
We deliver excellence for all 
our Shareholders, through 
strong leadership, performance 
culture and rigorous standards 
of governance.

EMPLOYEES:
GOOD JOBS

c.£700m

paid in employee benefits in 2019

READ A CASE STUDY 
ABOUT OUR EMPLOYEES 
PAGES 12-13

CUSTOMERS:
TECHNOLOGY PARTNER

£2.8bn

in orders in 2019

READ A CASE STUDY  
ABOUT OUR CUSTOMERS 
PAGES 30-31

SUPPLIERS:
VALUABLE PARTNER

£1.6bn

invested by Weir to support our operations

READ MORE ABOUT OUR SUPPLIERS 
PAGE 27

SHAREHOLDERS:
STRONG RETURNS

£122m

paid in dividends, 36 years of stable or 
growing dividend returns

READ MORE ABOUT OUR  
INVESTMENT CASE  
PAGE 18

COMMUNITIES AND ENVIRONMENT:
SAVING ENERGY

GOVERNMENT AND  
NGOS: TAX

30%

reduction in energy consumption provided by 
our HPGR technology

READ MORE ABOUT OUR TECHNOLOGY 
PAGE 38

£90m

paid in corporation taxes in 2019

READ MORE ABOUT OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS 
PAGE 32

Our business model is supported by our ‘We are Weir’ strategic framework. See page 2.

15

 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S STRATEGIC REVIEW

A MORE FOCUSED, PREMIUM-QUALITY WEIR

WE ARE BUILDING 
A GLOBAL FAMILY 
OF HIGHLY ENGAGED 
AND TALENTED 
PEOPLE. 

JON STANTON
Chief Executive Officer

STRONG STRATEGIC PROGRESS
2019 was a year of significant progress in 
creating a more focused, premium-quality 
Weir capable of delivering longer-term 
sustainable growth opportunities for all 
stakeholders. We executed the portfolio 
changes announced in 2018 with the 
successful sale of Flow Control completed 
in June and continuing delivery of the ESCO 
integration benefits significantly ahead of 
schedule. These changes have transformed 
Weir into a leading mining equipment 
business with Minerals and ESCO accounting 
for nearly 80% of Group revenues and 
underpinned by robust aftermarket demand 
and strong original equipment order intake.

In addition, we have made considerable 
progress in accelerating our core capabilities 
in our core markets: people, customers, 
technology and performance. We are building 
a global family of highly engaged and talented 
people who are now all co-owners of the 
business. We are working more closely with 
our customers by leveraging our unrivalled 
site-level presence and strategic technology 
alliances. This close partnership enables us 
to develop new technologies that will help 
our customers operate in a smarter, more 
efficient and more sustainable way. And we 
are evolving our high-performance culture that 
is delivering results for all our stakeholders. 

I would like to thank all of our 15,000 
colleagues for their contribution in 2019.

KEEPING OUR PEOPLE SAFE
At Weir, our number one priority is to keep 
our people safe. As a manufacturer we 
operate factories and foundries where large 
and complex products are made. It can be a 
hazardous environment, but we work hard 
to reduce risks and never compromise. 
In 2019 we made excellent progress with 
our underlying Total Incident Rate (TIR) 
falling to 0.27, down 40%, making us one 
of the safest industrial companies in the 
world. Of particular note, Weir Oil & Gas did 
not record a single Lost Time Incident (LTI) 
throughout the year.

However, people occasionally have accidents, 
with the most common incidents involving 
people moving equipment and their hands 
and fingers getting injured. By focusing on 

JON STANTON
Chief Executive Officer

16

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

Announcing a $15m investment in ESCO’s 
Newton, Mississippi facility

from our higher margin mining businesses, 
Minerals and ESCO, were up 4% (ESCO 
on a pro forma basis) to more than £2bn, 
reflecting our increased scale and relevance 
to customers.

DEMAND UNDERPINNED BY  
LONG-TERM GROWTH TRENDS
As the world’s population grows and 
urbanises there continues to be increased 
demand for natural resources. The Group’s 
largest mining commodity exposures are 
copper, iron ore and gold. But as demand 
increases, new supplies are harder to 
access with ore grade declines in mining 
meaning more rock needs to be processed 
to generate the same amount of ore. 
This intensifies use of our equipment and 
increases demand for spares and services. 
It is one of the key reasons Minerals delivered 
5% compound annual growth (CAGR) in 
aftermarket revenues between 2014 and 
2019, a period that included a significant 
downturn in mining markets. That resilience 
is also being supported by demand for the 
enabling materials for lower-carbon energy 
supplies. Weir technology is used to process 
the majority of the world’s copper, which is 
a key component in infrastructure for lower 
carbon electricity generation and electric 
vehicles, which typically require four times 
the copper content of internal combustion 
engine alternatives.

BENEFITING FROM SMARTER, 
MORE EFFICIENT AND SUSTAINABLE 
SOLUTIONS 
And while mining has an important role to 
play in providing the essential metals that will 
enable the transition to lower carbon energy, 
it also has a challenge to reduce its own 
environmental impact, while meeting future 
global demand. To meet this dual challenge 
miners are increasingly turning to technology 

17

partners like Weir to help them increase 
productivity and lower emissions. That is why 
we have focused our technology agenda on 
making our customers’ operations smarter, 
more efficient and sustainable, with a range 
of innovations that significantly reduce 
energy, water and waste. Our Enduron® 
high pressure grinding rolls are an excellent 
example of this in action. They reduce energy 
consumption by 30% compared to traditional 
alternatives in comminution, which is the 
screening, crushing and grinding of rock and 
is one of the most energy-intensive processes 
in mining. These savings were instrumental 
in Minerals securing the record £100m Iron 
Bridge order for a new magnetite iron ore 
development in Western Australia, where the 
improved crushing performance supported 
both the economics and environmental 
ambitions of our customer. 

MAXIMISING VALUE FROM  
OIL & GAS
Since becoming CEO in 2016 the Group’s 
clearly stated priority for capital allocation 
has been on extending our premium mining 
technology positions. We have made good 
progress including the acquisition and 
successful integration of ESCO, sale of Flow 
Control and continued strengthening of 
Minerals. The Oil & Gas Division shares many 
of the same underlying characteristics as 
Minerals and ESCO, but its market dynamics 
have changed with shorter cycles and higher 
levels of volatility leading to a very different 
financial profile to our mining businesses. 
As a result, we have recognised a £546m 
impairment in our North American Oil & Gas 
business. Our focus is now on becoming 
a mining technology pure play and we are 
looking for opportunities to maximise value 
from the Oil & Gas Division at the right time. 
Today, the market backdrop is a challenge, 
so we will continue to manage the business 

changing behaviours and not just processes 
we are helping more of our people return 
home safely to their families. Our ambition 
remains to become a zero-harm workplace 
and I am confident we will get there, not 
least because in many locations we already 
have. What makes me most optimistic is not 
the harm reduction programmes we have in 
place, good as they are, but the culture of 
looking after each other that helps define Weir.

OUR MARKETS IN 2019
2019 saw the business make good 
progress in our mining markets which were 
generally positive, supported by long-term 
fundamentals and the lack of investment seen 
in the capex downturn. Our mining customers 
remain focused on cash generation and 
returns but are also under significant pressure 
to reduce their environmental impact and to 
operate more safely. This is Weir’s sweet spot 
– providing leading technology that makes 
operations more efficient while also reducing 
energy, water and waste – and both Minerals 
and ESCO benefited from our customers’ 
focus on these areas. While mining markets 
were positive, conditions in North American 
oil and gas markets deteriorated through 
2019. The industry has changed its focus from 
growth to capital discipline with producers 
fixing budgets at the beginning of the year, 
drilling wells quickly to benefit from longer 
streams of cash flow and then reducing 
activity when their annual budgets are 
exhausted. The downturn in activity in the 
second half of the year exacerbated already 
oversupplied frack fleet markets which in turn 
reduced demand for our original equipment 
and aftermarket spares. 

A HIGH-QUALITY MINING 
TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS
We continued to strengthen our market-
leading position in mining. Weir is the only 
provider of premium solutions from pit to 
processing, some of the most mission-critical 
parts of the mining value chain. Our focus 
on high abrasion applications, which drive 
ongoing demand for aftermarket (AM) spares 
and services, underpins the resilience of 
our business. In 2019, these higher-margin 
AM sales represented 79% of Minerals and 
ESCO revenues. These sales were supported 
by our unrivalled global service network that 
means we have a presence in every major 
mining region. Both ESCO and Minerals 
made market share gains by leveraging each 
other’s customer relationships and facilities, 
supporting progress towards our medium-
term target of delivering $50m in revenue 
synergies. Increasingly, we are being asked 
by customers to co-locate on their mine 
sites to guarantee security of supply for the 
technology we provide. In total, revenues 

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S STRATEGIC REVIEW
CONTINUED

with a long-term perspective, including taking 
continued action to optimise our footprint 
for current market conditions whilst still 
investing in technology to drive market share 
gains and support long-term value. However, 
we are taking actions so that whenever we 
identify a clear solution to drive value for 
our Shareholders, we will be ready and able 
to capitalise.

WINNING THROUGH ‘WE ARE WEIR’
Our ‘We are Weir’ strategic framework 
focuses on where we can deliver distinctive 
value – People, Customers, Technology 
and Performance. In 2019 we continued to 
make good progress in strengthening our 
core capabilities to support our position 
as a winner in our markets. In addition to 
an excellent safety performance we also 
launched Weir ShareBuilder, one of the most 
comprehensive employee share plans in the 
world, giving all our people in more than 
50 countries the opportunity to become 
co-owners of our business. The response 
throughout the Group has been fantastic with 
people really excited about the opportunity to 
build a long-term stake in our business.

Minerals delivered an additional £155m in 
orders through their Integrated Solutions 
Strategy which leverages their broad product 
portfolio to deliver productivity gains for 
customers. We also continued to increase 
our relevance to customers with market share 
gains by ESCO through the deployment of 
their Nemisys® N70 lip system technology 
among smaller mining machines. 

Oil & Gas benefited from their large bore 
simplified frack system which continued 
to gain traction due to its increased safety 
and efficiency. Its success contributed to 
the £177m in revenues from new solutions 
across the Group in 2019. And we took action 
to right-size our North American Oil & Gas 
business through an annualised £35m cost 
reduction programme, supporting its financial 
performance whilst Minerals also exited 
lower margin comminution segments.

DELIVERING SECTOR-LEADING 
PERFORMANCE THROUGH  
THE MINING CYCLE 
When we first announced the acquisition of 
ESCO in 2018 we set out a target to achieve 
annualised cost savings of $30m in the first 
three years of ownership and to move the 
division’s operating margins from 11.1% 
towards 17% over the medium-term. 

By the end of 2019, 18 months after 
completion, we had achieved cost savings 
of $25m supported by a range of measures 
including removing duplicative corporate 
costs, merging functions, leveraging our 

increased scale to secure procurement 
savings and consolidating overlapping 
facilities. We now expect to reach our 
original $30m cost saving target in 2020. 
In addition to costs synergies there has also 
been good progress in delivering revenues 
synergies. Both ESCO and Minerals have 
made market share gains by leveraging 
each other’s customer relationships and 
facilities, supporting progress towards our 
medium-term target of delivering $50m 
in revenue synergies.

EVOLVING THE GROUP EXECUTIVE 
LEADERSHIP TEAM
In January 2020 we announced that 
Jon Owens would retire as ESCO Division 
President in July 2020 after more than 
30 years’ service. Jon has been an excellent 
leader of ESCO, particularly during its 
transition into Weir following the 2018 
acquisition. We wish him a happy retirement. 
He will be succeeded by Andrew Neilson, 
who is currently Regional Managing Director 
of Weir Minerals Europe, Russia, Central 
Asia and North Africa. Andrew is a graduate 
engineer who has excellent experience across 
the Group and led the successful ESCO 
integration team. The Group Executive was 
also strengthened with the appointments of 
Paula Cousins and Garry Fingland as Chief 
Strategy and Sustainability Officer and Chief 
Information Officer respectively, reflecting the 
increased importance of sustainability and 
digital technology to our business. I would 
also like to thank former Chief Technology 
Officer Geetha Dabir who left the business 
at the end of 2019 for her contribution to 
developing our digital platforms.

OUTLOOK FOR 2020
Looking to the year ahead, there is uncertainty 
over the impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) on 
the global economy and demand for natural 
resources. Assuming underlying demand 
does not change, we expect further good 
constant currency growth in our mining-
focused businesses to be offset by the 
continued challenges in North American oil 
and gas markets.

WEIR INVESTMENT CASE
Aligned to global structural trends
•  End markets benefit from increasing 

population, urbanisation and 
economic growth

•  Positioned to benefit from carbon transition 

– Weir equipment used to process the 
majority of the world’s mined copper
•  Key role in developing technology that 
makes our markets more sustainable

High barriers to entry
•  Unique provider of premium mining 
solutions from pit to processing

•  Trusted technology leader in 

conservative markets 

•  Comprehensive global service network 
providing unrivalled security of supply to 
need-it-now industries

Optimum business model for  
cyclical markets
•  Large installed base focused on  

mission-critical solutions

•  Aftermarket-intensive applications 
supported by ore grade declines

•  Strong returns through the mining cycle

A platform for future growth
•  ‘We are Weir’ strategy driving 

organic growth

•  Flexible customer-focused operating model 
providing global capability and local delivery 

•  Opportunities to consolidate in 

attractive markets

OUR INVESTMENT 
CASE IS UNDERPINNED 
BY BEST IN CLASS 
CORPORATE 
GOVERNANCE 
AND SOCIAL 
RESPONSIBILITY 
TOWARDS OUR 
PEOPLE AND OUR 
COMMUNITIES. 

JON STANTON 
Chief Executive Officer

26 February 2020

18

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

OUR AMBITIOUS SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY
A growing focus for many of our stakeholders is how we approach environmental, social and governance issues at Weir. Sustainability is an area 
we have carefully considered in the last year and we have taken practical measures to demonstrate its importance within our business and how it 
reinforces our ability to create value for all stakeholders.

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

The foundation is a commitment to best in class governance – ensuring we are a well-run business that conducts itself with integrity at all times 
– and also giving prominence to our social responsibilities, as reflected in our ‘We are Weir’ framework.

For example, in addition to giving all employees the opportunity to become co-owners of our business, we are very active in local employee and 
community welfare, and we support STEM and broader education and diversity initiatives on a very wide front. In looking at everything that we 
do I am very proud to say that we are playing a leading role in running our business in a fair, equitable and inclusive way.

In 2019 we worked with stakeholders to develop our new sustainability strategy that sets out our priorities and goals. We identified four key areas 
where we can make the biggest difference. Our most significant contribution will be in reducing the environmental impact of our customers’ 
operations, but we also want to continue to lead by example in our own business, particularly in championing zero harm, creating sustainable 
solutions, reducing our own footprint by 50% by 2030 and nurturing Weir’s unique culture.

We believe this provides an ambitious sustainability strategy, fully aligned to our purpose and group strategy, helping to build an ever stronger 
Weir. You can read more in the Sustainability Review from page 60.

ZERO TIR

ENABLING
NET ZERO

LEADING
eNPS SCORE

50%
REDUCTION
IN CO2e 
BY 2030

19

SOLUTIONSCREATING SUSTAINABLEFOOTPRINTREDUCING OURZERO HARMCHAMPIONINGNURTURING OURUNIQUE CULTURE 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S STRATEGIC REVIEW
CONTINUED

PEOPLE

We are a global family. We are 
proud of our unique blend of 
talent, technology and culture. 
We are here to inspire you to do 
the best work of your life.

LINK TO KPIs

Sustainable Engagement and 
Organisational Effectiveness

READ MORE 
PAGES 22-23

CUSTOMERS

We will be the most 
admired business in our 
sector. Working in partnership, 
we deliver distinctive solutions 
and compelling value.

LINK TO KPIs

Increased market share

READ MORE 
PAGES 22-23

WORLD CLASS SAFETY 
PERFORMANCE
We have an ambition to be a zero-harm 
workplace where everyone has a safe 
start, safe finish and safe journey home to 
their families. In 2020 we aim to continue 
to reduce our Total Incident Rate through 
a number of programmes to promote 
behavioural safety. This will include additional 
training for employees and continuing to 
invest in ESCO facilities to accelerate the 
division’s journey to zero-harm. 

ORGANISATIONAL CAPABILITY
Having completed a strategic workforce 
planning assessment in 2019 and established 
externally benchmarkable organisational 
effectiveness measures, we will design and 
roll-out a new performance development 
strategy in 2020, building capability in areas 
where we have identified skills gaps. We will 
also begin initial implementation of a new 
human resources management system 
which will improve efficiency across our 
people processes.

EXTENDING OUR SERVICE 
ADVANTAGE
We will continue to extend our 
comprehensive global service network, which 
is a key competitive advantage. This will 
include expanding into new territories to grow 
market share, building on our current footprint 
which includes facilities within 200km of 
every major mine in the world and a presence 
in every major North American oil and gas 
shale basin. 

INCREASE CUSTOMER 
PARTNERSHIPS
Our customers look to Weir to help them 
solve some of their toughest operating 
challenges. In mining this includes working 
with a large global miner to develop our 
Terraflowing® technology that can reduce 
the water content of tailings allowing this 
waste product to be cost effectively stored 
or repurposed. ESCO will continue to 
commercialise their automated toolhead 
technology and extend their Nemisys® to 
smaller machine classes. In Oil & Gas, we 
will work with customers to field test our 
new SPM® QEM 5000 electric frack pump 
which significantly reduces the environmental 
impact of fracking equipment.

20

A HIGH PERFORMING CULTURE
We will build on the comprehensive employee 
listening and engagement programmes we 
have established which include implementing 
an Inclusion and Diversity strategy in 
response to employee feedback. We will 
refresh and relaunch our ‘We are Weir’ 
strategic framework reflecting our new 
purpose and focus on sustainability. And we 
will seek to improve employee engagement 
further, benchmarking our performance 
against industry peers.

LISTENING AND LEARNING 
FROM OUR CUSTOMERS
The better we understand our customers’ 
needs the more relevant we will be to 
them. The Group will deploy new customer 
relationship management technology to 
improve the efficiency and effectiveness of 
our ‘voice of customer’ processes. This will 
include gathering more customer insights, 
helping us optimise maintain or enhance 
customer satisfaction and inform our 
technology priorities.

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS
Through our new sustainability strategy we 
are embedding best practice in sustainable 
product development into our technology 
roadmaps with appropriate key performance 
indicators. In 2020 we will conduct a deep 
assessment of the potential long-term 
challenges and opportunities in our markets, 
and use these insights to inform future 
innovation programmes. We will further 
leverage the Weir Advanced Research Centre 
to promote increased collaboration across the 
Group and with external partners.

IMPROVE SUSTAINABILITY
We have set ambitious targets to reduce our 
impact on the environment and in 2020 we 
will execute against our new sustainability 
strategy. This will include: developing  
division-wide programmes to help us achieve 
our aim of reducing our emissions by 50% by 
2030. This will involve assessing how we can 
use renewable energy sources to power our 
facilities including our foundries, which are the 
heaviest consumers of energy.

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

SMART SOLUTIONS
The Group’s digital capability includes our 
Synertrex® IoT technology that provides 
customers with condition monitoring data 
to help optimise the performance of their 
processes. In 2020, we will accelerate 
deployment of digital technology to more 
customers including new applications that 
will support customers desire for increased 
productivity. Each division will be able to 
leverage common platforms and infrastructure 
but design bespoke solutions for their 
particular market segment. 

EFFICIENT SOLUTIONS
Our technology is used in high abrasion 
applications meaning the quality of our 
materials science is crucial to maintaining and 
extending our technology leadership. In 2020 
we will continue to invest in research and 
development to design new alloys that extend 
product life, including our next generation 
slurry pump. We will leverage our increasing 
capability in additive manufacturing to bring 
additional products to the market while 
piloting so-called Smart Factory automation, 
aiming to benefit from the operational 
efficiencies these technologies bring. 

REALISE THE BENEFITS OF 
THE GROUP PORTFOLIO
When the Group acquired the ESCO business 
in 2018 we set out a target of achieving $30m 
in cost synergies in the first three years of 
ownership. We will achieve that target in 2020 
ahead of schedule. In addition, we will make 
further progress towards our medium-term 
aim of delivering $50m in revenue synergies 
between ESCO and Minerals.

OPTIMISE OUR OPERATIONS
The Group has a diversified operating model 
where local managers are empowered to 
act in the best interests of their customers. 
This is supported by common processes and 
technologies that allow the Group to take 
advantage of its global scale. In 2020 we 
will successfully deliver our record £100m 
Iron Bridge contract, complete upgrades 
to ESCO’s largest foundry and continue to 
implement new Enterprise Resource Planning 
software across the Minerals business. 

21

TECHNOLOGY

We shape the next 
generation of smart, efficient, 
sustainable solutions with 
cutting-edge science and 
tradition of innovation.

LINK TO KPIs

Increased percentage of revenues 
from new solutions

READ MORE 
PAGES 22-23

PERFORMANCE

We deliver excellence for all 
of our stakeholders, through 
strong leadership, performance 
culture and rigorous standards 
of governance.

LINK TO KPIs

Sustainably higher margins through the cycle

READ MORE 
PAGES 22-23

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

OUR KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

FINANCIAL AND NON-FINANCIAL MEASURES  
ALIGNED TO ‘WE ARE WEIR’

FINANCIAL

NON-FINANCIAL

PROFIT BEFORE TAX AND AMORTISATION 
(PBTA) AND EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS 
(CONTINUING OPERATIONS)

WORKING CAPITAL AS A PERCENTAGE 
OF SALES

PEOPLE

310

303

26.4

26.9

25.6

22.8

23.1

250

220

170

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

20151

20161

20171

20182

20193

1   Total Group
2   From continuing operations excl. ESCO
3   From continuing operations

2019 performance
Our working capital as a percentage 
of sales increased 0.3% reflecting 
investment in the growth in Minerals 
and the impact of the market downturn 
in Oil & Gas in North America. 

You can read more in the Financial Review 
on page 32.

Link to Remuneration
70% of Executive Director remuneration 
is directly linked to progress against 
financial KPIs. In 2019, the Remuneration 
Committee awarded 0% out of a possible 
20% for progress against working 
capital targets. You can read more in the 
Remuneration report on page 117.

Associated risks
•  Market volatility
•  Contract risk
•  Political and social risk
•  Technology and innovation
•  Value Chain Excellence
•  Competition

2019 performance
Continuing operations reported profit 
before tax, amortisation and exceptional 
items of £303m was down by £7m or 2%, 
with strong profit growth in both Minerals 
and ESCO more than offset by the 
challenging conditions in North American 
oil and gas markets.

You can read more in the Financial Review 
on page 32 and the Operating Review 
sections on pages 38-49

Link to Remuneration
70% of Executive Director remuneration 
is directly linked to progress against 
financial KPIs. In 2019, the Remuneration 
Committee awarded 12% out of a possible 
50% for progress against PBTA targets. 
You can read more in the Remuneration 
report on page 117.

Associated risks
•  Market volatility
•  Contract risk
•  Political and social risk
•  Technology and innovation
•  Value Chain Excellence
•  Competition

2019 performance
We continued to make good progress 
towards becoming a zero-harm workplace 
with a 40% reduction in our underlying 
Total Incident Rate to 0.27. As part of our 
programme to build a higher performance 
culture we developed organisational 
effectiveness metrics that will inform 
future development programmes. 
We also completed a strategic workforce 
planning process to identify key skills 
gaps and support future recruitment 
and training initiatives in addition to 
completing the initial design of a new 
HR management system. 

Link to Remuneration
30% of Executive Director remuneration 
is directly linked to progress against 
strategic priorities including people. 
The Remuneration Committee awarded 
6.9% out of a possible 7.5% for progress 
against People priorities. You can read 
more in the Remuneration Report on 
pages 118-120.

Associated risks
•  Safety, Health and Environment
•  Staff recruitment, development 

and retention

•  Political and social risk
•  Technology and innovation

22

 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

NON-FINANCIAL

CUSTOMER

TECHNOLOGY

PERFORMANCE

2019 performance
We extended our leading global service 
network to new territories and increased 
the number of engineers embedded 
in our remote facilities. ESCO and 
Minerals leveraged each other’s customer 
relationships to grow market share making 
good initial progress towards a $50m 
revenue synergy target over the  
medium-term. Oil & Gas strengthened 
its position in the Middle East, expanding 
in Saudi Arabia and signing pressure 
pumping distribution agreements. All three 
divisions worked in partnership with 
customers to develop new technologies 
and extend their field trial programmes. 

Link to Remuneration
30% of Executive Director remuneration 
is directly linked to progress against 
strategic priorities including Customer. 
The Remuneration Committee awarded 
6.8% out of a possible 7.5% for progress 
against Customer priorities. You can read 
more in the Remuneration Report on 
pages 118-120.

Associated risks
•  Safety, Health and Environment
•  Staff recruitment, development 

and retention

•  Political and social risk
•  Technology and innovation
•  Value Chain Excellence
•  Competition

2019 performance
The Group focuses its technology 
agenda on making customers operations 
smarter, more efficient and sustainable. 
This included developing new materials 
to increase wear life. Minerals signed an 
agreement with a customer to develop 
their Terraflowing® technology that 
enables tailings waste to be recycled 
or repurposed. Oil & Gas introduced 
an electric frack pump that significantly 
reduces the operating footprint of frack 
sites and the Group started work on 
redesigning a selection of its products 
using additive manufacturing.

Link to Remuneration
30% of Executive Director remuneration 
is directly linked to progress against 
strategic priorities including Technology. 
The Remuneration Committee awarded 
6.4% out of a possible 7.5% for progress 
against Technology priorities. You can read 
more in the Remuneration Report on 
pages 118-120.

Associated risks
•  Safety, Health and Environment
•  Staff recruitment, development 

and retention

•  Political and social risk
•  Technology and innovation
•  Environment & sustainability

23

2019 performance
The Group achieved $25m in cost 
synergies from the integration of ESCO, 
ahead of the original schedule. It also 
completed the successful sale of Flow 
Control for an Enterprise Value of £275m. 
Operational improvements included exiting 
lower margin comminution markets and 
improving on-time delivery. The Group also 
completed a new sustainability strategy 
including setting ambitious targets for 
emissions reductions.

Link to Remuneration
30% of Executive Director remuneration 
is directly linked to progress against 
strategic priorities including Performance. 
The Remuneration Committee awarded 
6.3% out of a possible 7.5% for progress 
against Performance priorities. You can 
read more in the Remuneration Report on 
pages 118-120.

Associated risks
•  Safety, Health and Environment
•  Staff recruitment, development 

and retention

•  Political and social risk
•  Technology and innovation
•  Value Chain Excellence

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

SUCCESSFULLY  
DELIVERING 
OUR  
STRATEGY

24

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

AS PART OF A BIGGER 
BUSINESS WE’RE ABLE 
TO SOLVE MORE OF OUR
CUSTOMERS’ OPERATING 
CHALLENGES. 

SIMON MMETHI
Field Service Assistant, South Africa

In 2018, the Group made its largest ever 
acquisition, purchasing ESCO for an enterprise 
value of $1.3bn. ESCO’s leading positions in 
Ground Engaging Tools (GET) for mining markets 
coupled with their aftermarket-intensive business 
model meant that the acquisition was one that 
perfectly matched the Group’s criteria.

Over 2019, the Group has made strong progress in integrating 
ESCO into the Group and leveraging key synergies between our 
two mining-focused divisions. In 2018, ESCO increased operating 
margins by 170 bps post acquisition whilst delivering operating 
profits of £66m. This strong performance continued in 2019 as 
the division increased operating profits by 25% to £83m with 
operating margins up 240bps on a constant currency  
pro-forma basis. 

The division has made great strides in embedding our ‘We are 
Weir’ strategic framework, with improvements made in safety 
performance and improving employee engagement rates.

Image: An ESCO Nemisys® N70 tooth, shroud and lip system on an 
ESCO Wheel Loader bucket

25

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

SECTION 172 STATEMENT

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Our success depends on forging and nurturing 
positive relationships with the people, 
communities and organisations that have an 
interest in our business and may be impacted 
by the decisions we take. These stakeholders 
are at the heart of ‘We are Weir’, the strategic 
framework that sets out our purpose, 
business model, strategic priorities, values 
and culture. It makes clear that we want to be 
a business that provides excellent outcomes 
for our employees, customers, Shareholders, 
suppliers, communities, environment, 
government and non-governmental 
organisations (NGOs).

The Group identifies its key stakeholders 
through its strategic planning process 
which is focused on delivering long-term 
sustainable value. Stakeholder engagement 

and analysis is also key to our approach to 
risk management. We engage with these 
important groups our stakeholders in a variety 
of ways from direct discussions to surveys 
and participating in community, industry and 
government forums. 

Effective engagement of stakeholder groups 
supports the principles of Section 172 of the 
Companies Act which sets out that Directors 
should have regard to stakeholder interests 
when discharging their duty to promote the 
success of the company. 

This provides valuable insights that inform 
the Board’s deliberations. For example, in 
developing the Group’s new sustainability 
strategy the Board conducted a 
comprehensive materiality assessment that 
included input from customers, employees, 
investors and NGOs. There was a common 
consensus among these groups that 
improving sustainability should include 
both environmental and non-environmental 
priorities and these are reflected in our 
sustainability targets. 

Page 27 sets out how we engage with our 
main stakeholders, the issues most material 
to them and how the Group has responded.

You can read more about our ‘We are Weir’ 
strategic framework on page 2. Our business 
model sets out the value we generate for 
stakeholders on page 14. Further information 
on the Board’s approach to stakeholder 
engagement is on page 27 and the Group’s 
sustainability strategy is on page 60.

T
N
E
M
s
O
N
G
V ER
& N

G O

C

O

E

N

M

V
I

M

R

U

O

N

N

I

T

I

M
E
N
T

E
S
&

EMPLOY E E S

C
U
S

T

O

OUR
STAKEHOLDERS

M

E

R

S

PLIER S

P
U
S

S H A R EHOLDERS

26

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

EMPLOYEES
How we engage

SUPPLIERS
How we engage

COMMUNITIES & ENVIRONMENT
How we engage

•  Board member responsible for representing 

•  Clearly defined supplier quality policy

•  Local open days to better understand 

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

employee voice

•  All-employee survey

•  ‘Meet the Board’ sessions

•  Monthly ‘CEO Briefing’

•  ‘Ask Jon’ CEO email address

•  Global webcasts and social media channels

What do they care about most?

•  Knowing their voice is heard

•  Ensuring everyone is treated fairly

•  No compromise on our Safety, Health or 

Environmental standards

•  Alignment between personal 

and company values

How do we respond?

•  Continuous prioritisation of safety above 
all else to become a zero harm workplace

•  ‘Employee Voice’ strategy

•  Commitment to building a truly 

inclusive culture

•  Ongoing engagement with our ‘We are 

Weir’ framework

CUSTOMERS
How we engage

•  Key account management

•  Voice of Customer insights

•  Technology partnerships

What do they care about most?

•  Safety

•  Efficiency

•  Quality and on-time delivery

•  Smart technologies

•  Sustainability

•  Supplier visits

•  Technology trials and collaborations

What do they care about most?

•  Trusted partnerships

•  Collaborative relationships

•  Responsive communication

our operations

•  Collaborations with local schools 

and universities

•  Supporting employment and 
apprenticeship schemes

What do they care about most?

•  Jobs and investment

How do we respond?

•  That we are good neighbours, operating 

•  Face-to-face meetings with suppliers

•  Key account support

•  Equal opportunity policies for all suppliers

•  Strong safety culture 

SHAREHOLDERS
How we engage

•  Annual Report and General Meeting

•  One-to-one meetings

•  Investor conferences

•  Capital Markets Days

•   Visits to company facilities

•  Good environmental & social governance

What do they care about most?

•  Clear strategy and good execution

•  Strong returns and management 

through the cycle

•  Protecting and enhancing the reputation 

of the Group

How do we respond?

•  ‘We are Weir’ strategic framework

•  We treat all our Shareholders equally

•  Regular reporting of performance

•  Growing ahead of our end markets

safely and ethically

•  That we actively help and support 

local communities

•  Reducing environmental impact

How do we respond?

•  Providing direct employment to 

c.15,000 people

•  Investing in our facilities to provide a safe, 

nurturing and stretching environment

•  Investing in school, graduate and 

PhD programmes

•  Developing and executing our 

sustainability strategy

GOVERNMENT & NGOs
How we engage

•  Direct engagement with national and local 

politicians and officials

•  Membership of industry bodies

•  Supporting NGO efforts to improve STEM 

education opportunities

What do they care about most?

•  Creating and sustaining employment

•  Investing in R&D and productivity

•  Business contributing towards 

educational opportunities

•  Embedded sales and engineering teams

•  Financial discipline

•  Code of Conduct, risk assessments and 

How do we respond?

•  Trusted long-term partnerships

sustainability strategy

•  Ever-present service

How do we respond?

•  Investment in research and development

•  Technology roadmaps developed through 

Voice of Customer processes

•  Sustainability materiality assessment

•  Providing good jobs for c.15,000 people

•  Investing 1.3% of sales in R&D including 

partnerships with universities

•  Investing in programmes that support STEM 
education particularly amongst women and 
other under-represented groups

27

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

CHAIRMAN AND CEO Q&A

CHARLES BERRY
Chairman

JON STANTON
Chief Executive Officer

Q.

DID 2019 PLAY OUT AS 
YOU EXPECTED?

A.

JS: In some ways yes, in others not quite. 
If we look at our strategic progress,  
I think there is a lot for us to be proud of, 
particularly in terms of safety and increasing 
our relevance to customers. If we look at 
markets, mining, our largest market, largely 
played out as we expected, and we delivered 
good growth because customers want 
technology partners like Weir to solve their 
problems more efficiently and sustainably. 
North American oil and gas was tougher than 

the industry expected at the beginning of 
2019, but we are used to operating in cyclical 
markets and we were able to respond quickly 
and effectively. 

CB: As Jon says we operate in cyclical 
markets and we need to see through  
short-term challenges to the long-term 
potential of the business. When the Board 
does that, we find really solid foundations, 
from our strong market leadership positions 
to initiatives such as giving our global 
workforce the opportunity to become co-
owners of the business. To me, that’s a sign 
of a Group that has a clear sense of its place 
in the world. I think we’ll see other companies 
replicating it in the years ahead as they did 
when we reformed remuneration policy, 
moving away from inappropriate Long Term 
Incentive Plans to more modest restricted 
share awards with lengthy holding periods. 

28

WE DELIVERED GOOD 
GROWTH BECAUSE 
CUSTOMERS WANT 
TECHNOLOGY 
PARTNERS LIKE WEIR 
TO SOLVE THEIR 
PROBLEMS MORE 
EFFICIENTLY AND 
SUSTAINABLY. 

CHARLES BERRY
Chairman

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Q.

THE GROUP HAS STEPPED 
UP ITS FOCUS ON 
SUSTAINABILITY – WHY IS 
THIS SO IMPORTANT FOR 
THE BUSINESS?

A.

CB: If you think about sustainability in its 
widest sense, Weir is a very sustainable 
business. We have been around for almost 
150 years and that has been achieved by 
being relentlessly future-focused. It’s meant 
that we have adapted when necessary and at 
every turn we have been able to successfully 
apply our culture of innovative engineering, 
whether that is to steamships, nuclear energy 
or mining. Among today’s great challenges are 
how our markets respond to climate change 
and the need for technology transformation 
to provide the essential resources the world 
needs more sustainably. And again, innovative 
engineering will be a key part of the solution.

JS: We have been very thoughtful about 
where we can make the biggest contribution 
to improving sustainability. The main focus will 
be on technology where we can significantly 
reduce our customers’ environmental impact 
but there is also opportunity internally to 
reduce emissions and that’s why the Board 
approved an ambitious 50% target for 
2030. But as Charles suggests we think of 
sustainability in a range of ways, from how 

we keep our people safe and ensure their 
voice is heard, to practicing the highest 
standards of corporate governance, and 
ensuring we make a positive difference 
and ‘give back’ to our communities around 
the world.

Q.

WHO DO YOU CONSIDER 
AS WEIR’S MAIN 
STAKEHOLDERS AND 
WHAT ROLE TO THEY PLAY 
IN SETTING STRATEGY?

A.

CB: Weir has never operated in isolation. 
We depend on lots of different groups 
to make Weir successful. That includes 
governments who provide the environment 
for enterprise to flourish. Employees who 
use their talent and passion to differentiate 
us from the competition. Customers who 
depend on us to be their technology partners. 
Investors who provide the capital for us to 
deliver long-term growth. Suppliers who 
are vital to supporting efficient operations, 
and communities who welcome Weir as 
a positive force in their neighbourhoods. 
These relationships are crucial to our success 
and that’s why we are proactive in seeking 
out views of our stakeholders and factoring 
them into Board deliberations. It’s what good 
partners do and Weir wants to be a business 
that people are proud to be associated with.

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

JS: In one of my first investor meetings as 
CEO a major shareholder told me to think 
of his organisation as just one of many 
stakeholders. It was reassuring because it 
resonated with the Board’s view of how we 
realise Weir’s potential. We do that by being 
open to new voices and challenges because 
we know that is how we continuously 
improve. I am extremely proud of how 
proactive we are in listening and learning from 
our people, customers, investors, suppliers, 
communities and others. It helps the Board 
make better decisions and it makes Weir a 
better business.

Q.

WHAT DO YOU SEE AS 
THE GROUP’S MAIN 
OPPORTUNITIES IN 
THE YEAR AHEAD?

A.

JS: I have never been more excited 
about our technology pipeline. We have 
a range of solutions in development that 
when fully realised will help lead the 
technology transformation in our industries. 
From a markets’ perspective, the fundamental 
drivers of our business remain robust. 
More immediately we will continue to pursue 
growth opportunities in mining, benefiting 
from our unique position as the only provider 
of premium solutions from the pit to the 
processing plant. 

CB: I look forward to the sustainability 
strategy being accelerated because I think 
that’s an area where we can deliver real value 
for all our stakeholders. One of my highlights 
in 2019 was the introduction of our ‘Meet 
the Board’ sessions where employees get 
to share their views and discuss a range 
of topics of their choosing with the Board. 
It shows how open we are to challenge but 
more importantly is a great opportunity to 
learn more about the business and its people 
and every time we do that, the whole Board 
emerges even more confident about the 
future of this business. 

The Weir Board & Group Executive 
teams meet colleagues in Santiago, Chile

29

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

DELIVERING  
INNOVATIVE  
SOLUTIONS  
FOR AN EVER  
CHANGING  
WORLD

30

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

In September 2019, the Group was 
awarded a record £100m order to provide 
industry-leading energy saving solutions to 
the Iron Bridge Magnetite Project, located 
145km south of Port Hedland in the Pilbara 
region of Western Australia.

The order comprised comminution and pump equipment 
including Enduron® High Pressure Grinding Rolls (HPGR) and 
GEHO® PD pumps. The innovative comminution circuit will reduce 
energy consumption by more than 30% compared to traditional 
milling technologies. It is also a dry processing solution, an 
important innovation in areas where water resources are scarce.

By significantly reducing energy and water consumption in 
the crushing of rock, not only is waste minimised, our HPGR 
technology offers a step change in efficiency and environmental 
performance. The Iron Bridge Project will be an important 
reference site for the industry with the potential project pipeline 
for HPGRs growing 40% in 2019 alone.

Our comminution offering is just one of a range of solutions 
aimed at making our customers smarter, more efficient and 
sustainable. You can read more in our operational reviews 
from page 38. 

BY SIGNIFICANTLY  
REDUCING ENERGY  
AND WATER  
CONSUMPTION OUR  
HPGR TECHNOLOGY  
OFFERS A STEP CHANGE 
IN EFFICIENCY AND 
ENVIRONMENTAL 
PERFORMANCE. 

PETER LEMPENS
Integrated Solutions Manager,
Weir Minerals Netherlands

Image: Enduron® high pressure grinding rolls (HPGR.) HPGR’s set the 
benchmark for energy efficient grinding and use dynamic skewing to 
provide best-in-class wear life for mining applications.

31

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

FINANCIAL REVIEW
FINANCIAL REVIEW

DELIVERING STRONG REVENUE GROWTH
Growth in mining offset by challenging North American  
oil and gas market conditions.

priorities and continue to see the benefit 
of our leading global service network with 
aftermarket orders at record levels while our 
Integrated Solutions strategy is driving strong 
project demand as evidenced by securing our 
largest ever Mining order; the £100m energy 
efficient crushing solution for the Iron Bridge 
Magnetite project in Western Australia. 

ESCO sees the same market backdrop 
as Minerals and is benefiting from similar 
customer proximity with good revenue growth 
in the year. Integration has gone very well with 
cost synergies driving strong margin progress 
and initial revenue synergies being delivered.

North American Oil & Gas markets were 
challenged with an industry-wide focus on 
cash generation rather than growth across the 
value chain. This, together with excess capacity 
in the North American frack fleet resulted in 
muted demand for both our original equipment 
and aftermarket products and services. Orders, 
revenues and despite significant restructuring 
efforts, profits were all lower as a result. 
These challenging market conditions together 
with uncertainty about the timing of a market 
recovery led to an exceptional impairment 
charge being recognised in respect of our 
North American Oil & Gas business.

REVENUE 

£2,662m

+9%

OPERATING PROFIT 4 

£352m

+1%

REPORTED LOSS AFTER TAX

(£379m) 

OVERVIEW
2019 saw continued positive momentum in 
our Mining businesses. At a Group level this 
forward momentum was offset by challenging 
market conditions and associated lower 
revenues and profits in Oil & Gas.

In Minerals, our customers continue to focus 
on maximising production from existing assets 
while cautiously progressing responsibly with 
expansion projects. We are aligned with these 

IN 2019 WE SAW 
CONTINUED POSITIVE 
MOMENTUM IN OUR 
MINING BUSINESSES 
DELIVERING GOOD 
REVENUE, PROFIT AND 
MARGIN PROGRESSION, 
WHILE NORTH 
AMERICAN OIL AND 
GAS MARKETS WERE 
CHALLENGING. 

JOHN HEASLEY
Chief Financial Officer

32

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Continuing operations order input and 
revenue increased by 8% and 7% 
respectively on a constant currency basis with 
a strong performance in Minerals and full year 
of ESCO results (which was acquired in July 
2018) being offset by the decline in Oil & Gas 
as a result of challenging market conditions. 
On a like-for-like basis, excluding ESCO, 
order input and revenue decreased by 4% 
and 6% respectively, with Minerals growth 
being offset by Oil & Gas. On a reported 
basis, including ESCO, revenues grew by 9%, 
benefiting from a £46m foreign exchange 
translation tailwind. 

Continuing operations reported profit 
before tax, amortisation and exceptional 
items of £303m was down by £7m or 2%. 
Operating exceptional charges of £596m 
(2018: £158m) were incurred mainly in relation 
to an impairment charge in Oil & Gas North 
America, restructuring and rationalisation 
costs in Oil & Gas and Minerals and ongoing 
costs related to the integration of ESCO. 
Earnings per share before amortisation and 
exceptional items of 87.9p was 7% lower 
reflecting the downturn in Oil & Gas and the 
higher average number of shares in issue 
following the ESCO acquisition in 2018.

Cash generated from operations decreased 
by £3m to £408m mainly driven by the 
downturn in the oil and gas market and 
impact from disposal of Flow Control, offset 
by a reclassification of lease costs under 
IFRS 16 ‘Leases’, stronger Minerals cash 
generation and full year positive impact of 
ESCO. Our reported net debt increased from 
£1,127m to £1,157m following the adoption 
of IFRS 16 ‘Leases’, which resulted in £185m 
of lease liabilities being classed as debt, and 
a free cash outflow of £79m offset mainly by 
proceeds of £263m from the sale of the Flow 
Control Division. Adjusted net debt to EBITDA 
on a covenant basis (excluding IFRS 16) 
increased to 2.46 times (2018: 2.36 times).

CONTINUING OPERATIONS 
ORDER INPUT
Order input at £2,792m increased 8% on a 
constant currency basis but decreased by 
4% on a like-for-like basis. Original equipment 
orders were £742m. Aftermarket orders were 
£2,050m. 

Minerals orders increased by 10% on 
a constant currency basis to £1,647m 
(2018: £1,500m) with a book-to-bill of 1.11. 

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

Original equipment orders were up 22% 
as a result of the record £100m Iron Bridge 
Project order in Australia. Excluding this 
landmark order, underlying original equipment 
orders were stable, and the division’s pipeline 
remained strong driven by the long-term 
structural growth drivers and the strength and 
breadth of its technology offering allowing an 
integrated solutions approach to customers. 
Aftermarket orders increased by 5% to record 
levels, with demand for spares and services 
supported by structural trends including ore 
grade declines. Aftermarket represented 
67% of total orders (2018: 70%), reflecting 
the strong original equipment order growth. 
In total, mining end-market orders accounted 
for 78% of the total (2018: 73%). 

ESCO orders decreased 1% on a constant 
currency pro forma7 basis to £557m 
(2018: £564m) due to phasing of capital 
and stocking orders with underlying 
mining demand strong. Aftermarket orders 
represented 95% of orders in line with 
ESCO’s position as a provider of highly 
engineered consumables to abrasive 
applications. Construction markets in North 
America were strong in the early part of the 
year before slowing through the second half. 

Oil & Gas orders of £588m (2018: £836m) 
were down 30% on a constant currency 
basis, reflecting the significant reduction in 
refurbishment and replacement activity in 
North America compared to the prior year 

period. Aftermarket orders, which represented 
71% (2018: 76%) of total orders, fell 34% 
due to the reduced activity levels and 
cannibalisation of existing equipment in North 
America. Original equipment orders were 
14% lower with declines in pump demand 
partially offset by increased International 
activity. North American orders were down 
sequentially in the fourth quarter as markets 
continued to soften. Orders from International 
markets were higher year-on-year.

CONTINUING OPERATIONS REVENUE
Revenue of £2,662m showed growth of 7% on 
a constant currency basis (down 6% like-for-like) 
mainly reflecting strong input performance in 
Minerals and a full year of ESCO, offset by lower 
revenue in Oil & Gas due to the challenging 
market conditions. Aftermarket accounted for 
77% of revenues which is roughly in line with 
the prior year. Reported revenues increased 
9%, impacted by a foreign exchange translation 
tailwind of £46m. 

Minerals revenue was 4% higher on both 
a constant currency and reported basis at 
£1,478m (2018: £1,415m). Original equipment 
sales accounted for 27% (2018: 28%) of 
divisional revenues and were stable on the 
prior year. Aftermarket revenues were up 6% 
reflecting order trends.

ESCO revenue increased 4% on a constant 
currency pro forma basis to £572m 
(2018: £549m) reflecting previous order 
growth and market and structural trends 

consistent with those seen in our Minerals 
Division with declining ore grades and 
customers efforts focused on maximising 
production from existing assets. 

Oil & Gas revenue reduced by 25% on 
a constant currency basis to £612m 
(2018: £817m). Original equipment and 
aftermarket revenues decreased by 8% 
and 31% respectively, with aftermarket 
accounting for 70% of total revenues 
(2018: 76%). North American revenues 
fell by 29% compared to the prior year 
reflecting challenging market conditions. 
International revenues were higher  
year-on-year due to increased project 
activity, particularly in the Middle East.

CONTINUING OPERATIONS PROFIT
Operating profit from continuing operations 
(before exceptional items and intangibles 
amortisation) increased by £4m (1%) to 
£352m. Excluding a £9m foreign currency 
translation tailwind the constant currency 
decrease was £5m. 

Minerals operating profit (before exceptional 
items and intangibles amortisation) increased 
by 7% on a constant currency basis to 
£270m (2018: £253m), driven by good 
underlying revenue growth and a favourable 
product mix. Strong performances in our 
Geho business driven by copper projects in 
South America was partly offset by weak 
demand in Central Africa as customers 
curtailed activity significantly due to sales 

RESULTS SUMMARY

Continuing operations1
Orders2
Revenue
Operating profit4
Operating margin4
Reported operating (loss) profit
Net finance costs
Profit before tax4
Reported (loss) profit before tax
Effective tax rate4
Earnings per share4

Total Group
Reported (loss) profit after tax
Cash generated from operations5
Net debt
(Loss) earnings per share
Dividend per share

2019
£2,792m
£2,662m
£352m
13.2%
(£322m)
(£50m)
£303m
(£372m)
24.4%
87.9p

(£379m)
£408m
£1,157m
(146.4p)
46.95p

2018
£2,592m
£2,450m
£348m
14.2%
£124m
(£38m)
£310m
£86m
25.3%
94.7p

£18m
£411m
£1,127m
7.4p
46.2p

As reported
n/a
9%
1%
-100bps
-360%
-32%
-2%
-532%
-90bps
-7%

-2,205%
-1%
£30m
-2,078%
2%

Constant currency2
8%
7%
-1%
-110bps
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

Like-for-like1,3
-4%
-6%
-17%
-160bps
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

The Financial Review includes a mixture of GAAP measures and those which have been derived from our reported results in order to provide a useful basis for measuring our operational 
performance. Operating results are for continuing operations before exceptional items and intangibles amortisation as provided in the Consolidated Income Statement. Details of other non-
GAAP measures are provided in note 2 of the financial statements.
1  Continuing operations excludes the Flow Control Division which was disposed of on 28 June 2019 and reported in discontinued operations. 
2  2018 restated at 2019 average exchange rates.
3  2018 restated at 2019 average exchange rates and like-for-like excluding ESCO acquisition in 2018.
4  Adjusted to exclude exceptional items and intangibles amortisation. 
5  Before exceptional cash flows. Net cash generated from operating activities was £264m (2018: £218m).
6  Calculation is on a covenant basis with net debt at average rates.
7  Pro forma figures for 2018 are provided for comparative purposes and are based on esco’s adjusted, unaudited us gaap management accounts.

33

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

FINANCIAL REVIEW
CONTINUED

tax changes and their own operational 
issues. Operating margin on a constant 
currency basis increased by 50bps to 
18.3% (2018: 17.8%), due to product 
mix and benefited from some delay to 
phasing of lower margin original equipment 
order shipments. 

ESCO operating profit (before exceptional 
items and intangibles amortisation) increased 
by £50m reflecting a full year of results and by 
£17m (25%) on a pro forma, constant currency, 
basis to £83m (2018: £66m), as a result of 
good revenue growth, operating leverage 
and benefits from the post-acquisition cost 
synergies. Cost synergies of US$25m were 
realised in the year with a run rate of $27m 
relative to our original target on acquisition 
of US$30m. Operating margin of 14.5% was 
up 240bps on a constant currency pro forma 
basis (2018: 12.1%).

Oil & Gas operating profit (before exceptional 
items and intangibles amortisation) including 
joint ventures was £37m (2018: £101m) on a 
constant currency basis. The decrease was 
driven by lower activity in North American 
markets, which also impacted pricing in 
some product lines and operating leverage. 
In response to the challenging market 
conditions a restructuring exercise was 
completed in the year which will deliver 
£35m of annualised savings of which £11m 
was realised in the year. Operating margin 
at 6.0% was down 640bps on a constant 
currency basis reflecting the challenging 
market conditions.

Unallocated costs increased £7m from the 
prior year to £38m supporting the ‘We are 
Weir’ strategy with increased investment 
in digital and advanced manufacturing 
technology as well as share based 
payments, including the all-employee Weir 
ShareBuilder plan. 

Reported operating loss for the year of 
£322m was £446m adverse to the prior year 
due to the increase in exceptional items and 
intangibles amortisation of £450m combined 
with the £4m increase in underlying 
operating profit.

CONTINUING OPERATIONS NET 
FINANCE COSTS
Net finance costs were £50m (2018: £38m). 
The overall increase of £12m compared to 
2018 was principally due to the adoption of 
the IFRS16 ‘Leases’ standard which resulted 
in an £8m interest charge in the year. 

Net finance costs (excluding retirement 
benefit related costs) were covered 7.9 times 
by operating profit from continuing operations, 
before exceptional items and intangibles 
amortisation (2018: 10.3 times).

CONTINUING OPERATIONS PROFIT 
BEFORE TAX
Profit before tax from continuing operations 
(before exceptional items and intangibles 
amortisation) decreased by 2% to £303m 
(2018: £310m). The reported loss before tax 
of £372m compares to an £86m profit in 
2018 due to an increase in exceptional items, 
including a £546m non-cash impairment of 
our Oil & Gas North American assets. 

CONTINUING OPERATIONS TAXATION
The tax charge for the year of £74m 
(2018: £79m) on profit before tax from 
continuing operations (before exceptional 
items and intangibles amortisation) of 
£303m (2018: £310m) represents an 
underlying effective tax rate (ETR) of 24.4% 
(2018: 25.3%). Our ETR is principally driven 
by the geographical mix of profits arising 
in our business and, to a lesser extent, by 
the impact of Group financing and transfer 
pricing arrangements. 

In terms of cash tax, the Group paid 
income tax of £90m in 2019 across all 
of its jurisdictions compared to £73m in 
2018. The increase is due largely to timing 
differences arising where 2019 cash tax 
instalment payments (or refunds) are driven 
partly by prior year current tax liabilities. 

CONTINUING OPERATIONS 
EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS AND 
INTANGIBLES AMORTISATION
Exceptional items increased to £596m 
(2018: £158m) with intangibles amortisation 
increasing to £78m (2018: £66m). The increase 
in amortisation reflects the impact of a full year 
charge for ESCO.

An impairment charge of £546m was 
recognised in the Oil & Gas North America 
cash generating unit (CGU). The current 
challenging market conditions and uncertainty 
about the timing of market recovery resulted 
in estimates of future cash flows featuring 
lower revenue and margin assumptions. 
This led to a review of specific assets which 
were considered to be at risk and resulted in 
impairment charges relating to brand names 
of £40m, customer relationships of £144m, 
inventory of £49m and property, plant & 
equipment of £25m. Subsequent testing of the 
remaining goodwill and intangible assets led 
to further impairment totalling £288m and this 
was charged against goodwill. 

The current market conditions impacting our 
Oil & Gas North America business result 
in significant estimates being required in 
the impairment testing of the intangible 
assets associated with the Oil & Gas North 
America cash generating unit. It is considered 
appropriate to disclose this as an area of 
significant estimation due to the size of the 

34

balance, the relatively low discount rates 
applied compared to recent years (due to 
market driven bond yield data) and the current 
levels of market uncertainty. Changes to these 
areas of significant estimation could reasonably 
lead to changes in the carrying value as a result 
of future events within the next five years.

Exceptional items include costs of £11m 
associated with the continued integration of 
ESCO. These costs and associated benefits are 
in line with our plans at the time of acquisition.

Restructuring and rationalisation charges in 
the year of £31m comprise £15m in Oil & Gas 
and £16m in Minerals. The Oil & Gas costs 
reflect actions taken to mitigate the challenging 
market conditions and include a 20% reduction 
in workforce and closure of a number of sites. 
Minerals £16m exceptional restructuring 
and rationalisation costs primarily reflect the 
decision to exit lower margin North America 
sand and aggregate comminution markets 
which included a write down of inventory and  
tangible assets, and a further £6m charge for 
the impairment of customer relationships. 

The cash impact of the current year exceptional 
income statement charge of £596m is 
expected to be £24m, with £17m already 
incurred in the year. The overall exceptional 
cash outflow of £41m in 2019 includes £24m 
related to exceptional items booked to the 
income statement in prior years.

A tax credit of £92m has been recognised in 
relation to exceptional items and intangibles 
amortisation (2018: £46m).

After exceptional items and intangibles 
amortisation, the reported loss for the year 
from continuing operations is £353m (2018: 
profit £53m).

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The reported loss for the year from 
discontinued operations is £26m 
(2018: £35m), including an underlying loss 
(before exceptional items and intangibles 
amortisation) of £4m (2018: profit £16m). 
The Group disposed of the Flow Control 
Division on 28 June 2019 for an enterprise 
value of £275m and a net consideration of 
£263m, after customary working capital and 
debt-like adjustments. In January 2020, the 
final consideration was determined, as part 
of the agreed completion accounts process, 
resulting in the Group making a full and 
final settlement to First Reserve of £4m. 
This resulted in a pre-tax loss on disposal of 
£8m being recognised at December 2019, 
an increase of around £3m from the position 
reported in June 2019. 

The loss of £8m reflects final cash proceeds 
of £259m, net assets at the date of disposal 
of £270m, costs of disposal of £17m and a 
gain of £20m from the recycling of cumulative 

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

foreign exchange differences from the foreign 
currency translation reserve to the income 
statement. The income tax charge of £14m 
primarily relates to the gain on disposal of 
the US entities and assets resulting in a total 
post-tax loss on disposal after tax of £22m. 

IFRS 16 LEASES 
IFRS 16 ‘Leases’ became effective from 
1 January 2019. At December 2019  
right-of-use assets were £178m, with 
corresponding lease liabilities of £185m 
resulting in an increase in net debt. 

CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
Net capital expenditure for the Group, 
including intangible assets, increased from 
£85m in 2018 to £104m in the current year, 
reflecting a continued investment in our 
strategic priorities, together with investment 
to enhance safety and operational efficiency 
at ESCO. Net capital expenditure on property 
plant and equipment (owned) of £81m was 
1.3 times depreciation. 

CASHFLOW AND NET DEBT
Cash from operating activities decreased by 
£3m to £408m in the year which is mainly 
driven by the downturn in the oil and gas 
market and the (£75m) impact from disposal 
of the discontinued Flow Control business, 
offset by a reclassification of lease costs 
under IFRS 16, stronger Minerals cash 
generation and full year impact of ESCO. 

Free cash flow from total operations 
(contained within note 2) decreased by 
£188m to an outflow of £79m (2018: inflow 
£109m), before cash exceptional items 
of £41m (2018: £142m). The decrease 
was driven by operating cash flows from 
discontinued operations £75m, tax £17m, 
capital expenditure £19m, and £42m 
increased dividend payment (due to a prior 
year scrip option and an increase in shares in 
issue following the ESCO acquisition). 

Total Group exceptional cash items of £41m 
relate to ESCO integration costs, legacy 
warranty issues in Oil & Gas and restructuring 
and rationalisation actions in both Oil & Gas 
and Minerals. 

The completion of the sale of Flow Control 
Division on 28 June 2019 resulted in cash 
proceeds, net of costs paid in the year and 
cash deposits at the date of disposal of 
£245m. In January 2020, a final payment of 
£4m in respect of the sale was paid to reflect 
the final consideration determined as part of 
the agreed completion accounts process.

The above movements resulted in closing 
Group net debt of £1,157m (2018: £1,127m), 
which includes IFRS 16 lease liabilities of 
£185m and a favourable foreign exchange 
movement of £35m. Excluding IFRS 16 
underlying financial debt reduced by £155m. 
On a lender covenant basis, the ratio  
of net debt to EBITDA was 2.4 times  
(2018: including a pro forma full year of  
ESCO 2.3 times) compared to a covenant 
level of 3.5 times. Details of the Group’s 
committed facilities are included in note 19.

In the Consolidated Income Statement, 
for continuing operations, the lease charge 
previously included in operating profit, is 
replaced in the year by depreciation on the 
right-of-use asset of £42m, an operating 
expense of £17m relating to short-term leases 
and low value assets which are exempt 
from capitalisation, and an interest charge 
of £8m included in Finance costs. The total 
lease charge recognised in the Consolidated 
Income Statement has increased to £67m 
(2018: £54m) following growth in underlying 
activity and the full year impact of ESCO. 

There is also a change in presentation of cash 
flows due to IFRS 16. Cash flows in respect 
of leases for the total Group, now recognised 
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, totalling 
£52m in the year, are included in financing 
activities rather than operating activities. 
Those leases exempt from capitalisation 
result in cash outflows from operating 
activities of £18m in the year, resulting in 
a total cash outflow from leases of £70m 
(2018: £59m).

PENSIONS
The Group has a mixture of defined 
benefit pension plans and other employee 
compensation or medical plans in both the 
UK and North America. 

The deficit of £139m compares to £149m 
in 2018. For the legacy Weir Schemes, the 
deficit decreased by £3m primarily due to 
actuarial gains of £74m on the asset side, 
updates to the mortality assumptions (£21m 
gain) and the payment of £9m in deficit 
reduction and one-off contributions, including 
a special contribution following the disposal 
of Flow Control. These gains are largely offset 
by actuarial losses of £98m on the liability 
side resulting from changes in financial 
assumptions, primarily the discount rate, plus 
a charge to the income statement of £2m. 

For the ESCO schemes, the deficit decreased 
by £7m due to gains of £15m on the asset 
side, contributions of £10m in the year, 
updates to the mortality assumptions 
(£3m gain) and exchange rate movements 
(£3m gain) offset by charges to the income 
statement of £4m and changes in market 
conditions, primarily relating to the discount 
rate, leading to a £20m loss on the liabilities. 

Insurance policy assets held for the two 
largest UK schemes now cover 41% 
(2018: 43%) of the Group’s total funded 
obligation across all schemes, excluding 

35

ESCO, reducing the Group’s exposure to 
actuarial movements. 

ASBESTOS PROVISION
Certain of the Group’s US-based subsidiaries 
are co-defendants in lawsuits pending in the 
United States in which plaintiffs are claiming 
damages arising from alleged exposure to 
products previously manufactured which 
contained asbestos. At the end of 2019, 
there were 1,551 asbestos-related claims 
outstanding in the US (2018: 1,383). 

Following our triennial review of estimated 
future indemnity and defence costs in 2017, 
we have continued to monitor our claims 
experience and recognise a US asbestos 
provision of £44m (2018: £48m) in line with 
the actuarial decay model and the projected 
claims. The Group has comprehensive 
insurance cover in place for claims with a 
pre-1981 date of first exposure and as a 
result recognises a corresponding insurance 
asset. Full details of the provision, plus related 
insurance receivable, are provided in note 21.

KEY ACCOUNTING AND POLICY 
JUDGEMENTS
The key accounting and policy judgements are 
contained within note 2 to the Group financial 
statements on page 144.

EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per share from continuing operations 
(before exceptional items and intangibles 
amortisation) decreased by 7% to 87.9p 
(2018: 94.7p). Reported loss per share 
including exceptional items, intangibles 
amortisation and loss from discontinued 
operations was 146.4p (2018 earnings per 
share: 7.4p). The weighted average number 
of shares in issue increased to 259.5m 
(2018: 244.1m) following the issue of 34.9m 
shares during 2018 in respect of the ESCO 
acquisition and scrip dividends.

DIVIDEND
The Board is recommending a final dividend 
of 30.45p resulting in a total dividend of 
46.95p for the year, a 2% increase on 2018. 
Dividend cover (being the ratio of earnings 
per share from continuing operations 
before exceptional items and intangibles 
amortisation, to dividend per share) is 
1.9 times (2018: 2.1 times). If approved at the 
Annual General Meeting, on 28 April 2020, 
the final cash dividend will be paid on 5 June 
2020 to Shareholders on the register as at 
24 April 2020. 

JOHN HEASLEY
Chief Financial Officer

26 February 2020

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

WORKING  
TOWARDS  
BECOMING  
A ZERO-HARM 
WORKPLACE

36

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

IT’S GREAT TO WORK FOR 
A COMPANY THAT PUTS 
SAFETY AS ITS NUMBER 
ONE PRIORITY. 

SUZANNE HARRISON
Iron Inspection Supervisor,  
Weir Oil & Gas, Canada

At Weir, we want every one of our people to 
have a safe start, a safe finish and a safe journey 
home to their family or loved ones. This will 
always be an area where we strive for continual 
improvement and where we are making good 
progress towards our ultimate goal for becoming 
a zero-harm organisation. Our underlying total 
injury rate is now 0.27 which makes us among 
the safest industrial companies to work for in 
the world.

During 2019, there were some exceptional safety performances 
across our business, including our Oil & Gas Division which 
recorded no lost time incidents over the year and recorded 
a 49% reduction in its TIR. 

Image: Weir Oil & Gas colleagues on site in 
Canada in January 2020. 

37

 
HIGHLIGHTS

•  +5% aftermarket orders; original 

equipment +22%

•  Operating margins of 18.3%; +50bps 

reflecting product mix 

•  Record £100m Iron Bridge order 

demonstrates strength of differentiated 
technology offering

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

OPERATIONAL REVIEW 
WEIR MINERALS

2019 MARKET REVIEW
Mining markets were positive in 2019 
supported by commodity prices with copper 
up 5%, iron ore up 29% and gold up 19%. 
To take advantage of these conditions, 
miners remained focused on productivity 
improvements and cash generation. 
There was also increased demand for more 
sustainable solutions that reduce mining’s 
environmental impact while also contributing 
towards lower total costs. A number of large 
greenfield developments were given final 
approval although the majority of expansion 
projects were focused on brownfield 
extensions of current assets. All regions saw 
good growth although Africa was impacted 
by subdued demand in Central Africa. 
Macro concerns led to some project delays 
in the third quarter, but these abated towards 
the end of the year as the US and China 
reached a trade agreement. 

These market trends were reflected in 
demand for original equipment which was 
principally from brownfield opportunities, with 
particular demand for energy-saving solutions. 
Aftermarket demand remained robust, 
supported by long-term structural trends 
including ore grade declines that mean that 
miners need to process increased volumes 
of harder rock to extract the same amount of 
ore, increasing wear on equipment. Oil sands 
demand remained robust.

In non-mining markets, industrial, power and 
infrastructure markets were more challenging. 

2019 OPERATING REVIEW
The division leveraged its strong market 
positions to take full advantage of the growth 
opportunities in 2019. This included its 
Integrated Solutions Strategy, which utilises 
its engineering expertise and broad product 
portfolio to improve customer productivity, 
delivering £155m in orders in 2019. 

The division also continued to extend its 
leading global service network with new 
openings focused on high growth areas 
including Russia, Central America, Central 
Asia, Africa and Asia Pacific. The service 
network gives the division the ability to rapidly 
respond to demand for spares and services 
and is a key differentiator in need-it-now 
mining markets. The effectiveness of this 
business model can be seen in the record 
aftermarket orders received in 2019.

Technology development continued to focus 
on expanding the product portfolio and 
working with our customers in developing 
smarter, more efficient and sustainable 
solutions. This included the division’s  
energy-saving Enduron® HPGR technology 
which saw strong growth in demand through 
the year including the record £100m Iron 
Bridge order. The division is also working 
with customers to develop innovative ore 
hoisting technology that has the potential 
to significantly improve the efficiency and 
safety of transporting ore from underground 
to the processing plant, reducing energy 
consumption and costs. In addition, the 
division signed an agreement with a major 
customer to pilot its Terraflowing® solution 
that reduces the water content of tailings 
waste in a cost-effective manner enabling 
it to be safely stored. 

THE DIVISION 
LEVERAGED ITS 
STRONG MARKET 
POSITIONS TO TAKE 
FULL ADVANTAGE 
OF THE GROWTH 
OPPORTUNITIES 
IN 2019. 

RICARDO GARIB
Division President, Weir Minerals

RICARDO GARIB
Division President, Weir Minerals

A Cavex® hydrocyclone cluster

38

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

The division continued to optimise its 
operating footprint including investment 
in its larger foundries in Europe, South 
America and Asia Pacific. It rationalised its 
comminution offering, closing a number of 
smaller facilities and exiting lower margin 
segments to focus on higher margin, hard 
rock mining opportunities. Longer-term 
plans continued to be developed to optimise 
global manufacturing and foundry capacity 
to take full advantage of positive market 
conditions and to support future growth and 
margins. The division also implemented a 
new customer relationship management 
system and further automated tracking of its 
extensive installed base.

2020 OUTLOOK
While the long-term fundamentals of mining 
markets remain positive there is currently 
uncertainty over the macro outlook for the 
global economy, which is heightened by the 
recent coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. 
Assuming underlying demand does not 
change, we expect the division to deliver 
good growth in constant currency revenues 
supported by delivery of the record Iron 
Bridge order, with operating margins slightly 
lower, reflecting product mix.

CAVEX® 800CVX HYDROCYCLONES 
IMPROVE FLOW RATE BY 15% AT 
MINERA CENTINELA, CHILE 
Working with the team at Minera 
Centinela, part of the Antofagasta 
Minerals Group, Weir Minerals was 
challenged to increase the mineral 
recovery in the grinding area as 
competitor hydrocyclones were 
underperforming. Cavex® 800CVX 
hydrocyclone clusters, to be powered 
by the incumbent Warman® MCR® 
650 slurry pump, were installed by the 
team. After the installation, the Cavex® 
hydrocyclones operated with a higher 
flow rate of 5480m3/h, equating to a 
15% improvement in mineral recovery 
over the competitor hydrocyclones.

REVENUE1 £m

£1,478m

+4%

OPERATING PROFIT1,2 £m

£270m

+7%

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

1,415

1,478

1,152

1,180

1,263

224

230

221

270

253

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

TOTAL INCIDENT RATE

HEADCOUNT (AVERAGE)

0.28

36% improvement

0.66

0.62

0.58

8,630

+1%

8,583

8,102

8,506

8,562

8,630

0.44

0.28

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

DIVISIONAL ORDERS BY END MARKET %

REVENUE BY ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT/
AFTERMARKET %

 Mining 

 Industrial 

 Oil & Gas 

 Naval & Marine 

 Power Generation 

 Infrastructure 

 Water & Sewage 

78%

8%

8%

2%

2%

1%

1%

 Aftermarket 

 Original Equipment 

73%

27%

DIVISIONAL ORDERS BY GEOGRAPHY %

NUMBER OF FACILITIES

 North America 

 South America 

 Australasia 

 Asia Pacific 

 Africa 

 Europe 

 Middle East 

22%

21%

21%

12%

12%

11%

1%

 Europe 

 Asia Pacific 

 Australia 

 Middle East & Africa 

 South America 

 North America 

51

31

27

27

22

22

1 

 Prior years restated at 2019 average exchange rates. 

2  Adjusted to exclude exceptional items and intangibles amortisation.

39

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

OPERATIONAL REVIEW 
WEIR MINERALS 
CONTINUED

SYNERTREX® ENABLED 
WARMAN® MCR® 550 
IMPROVES PUMP WEAR 
LIFE BY 140%

INDUSTRY
Gold Mining

CUSTOMER
Evolution Mining,  
Cowal Gold Operation

APPLICATION
Primary Cyclone Feed Pump

EQUIPMENT
Synertrex® enabled Warman® MCR® 
550 pump

Evolution Mining is a leading 
Australian gold producer. The Cowal 
Gold Operation (CGO) is an open-pit 
gold operation located 350km west of 
Sydney. Working with CGO who were 
looking to increase production, Weir 
Minerals suggested installing a second 
mill-pump to increase availability and a 
Synertrex® enabled Warman® MCR® 550 
was recommended as the best solution. 
After 29 weeks of operation, analysis 
showed that the pump would achieve 
more than 40 weeks of operation, an 
over 200% increase from the incumbent 
pump and of over 60% from the 
customer’s original goal of 24 weeks. 

THIS RESULT ALLOWED 
CGO TO REDUCE 
SHUTDOWNS BY 
EXTENDING THE LIFE 
OF THE CYCLONE FEED 
PUMP TO 40 WEEKS. 
IMPROVED RECOVERIES 
CONTRIBUTE TO 
THE OVERALL 
PROFITABILITY OF THE 
CGO OPERATION. 

RICARDO GARIB
Division President, Weir Minerals

The Synertex® enabled Warman® 
MCR® 550

40

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

41

 
HIGHLIGHTS

•  Market share gains supporting 4% 
increase in pro forma revenues

•  Delivered annualised run rate 

cost synergies of $27m, ahead of 
original schedule

•  Operating margins of 14.5%; 340bps 

improvement post acquisition 

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

OPERATIONAL REVIEW 
WEIR ESCO 

2019 MARKET REVIEW
The division benefited from the same 
macro mining trends as Minerals including 
increased ore production and the focus by 
mining customers on optimising productivity. 
This supported demand for differentiated 
technology that is proven to sustainably 
increase efficiency. Regionally, there was 
good demand growth in North America 
and Asia Pacific, with most other markets 
relatively stable with the exception of Africa 
which was more subdued due to political 
uncertainty and some customer-specific 
operational challenges.

In infrastructure markets, North American 
construction slowed as the year progressed 
and dredge activity was also reduced.

2019 OPERATING REVIEW
The division continued to focus on 
differentiating its offering through technology 
leadership and close customer proximity. 
This included market share gains by 
extending its Nemisys® technology to 
smaller machine classes including front 
end loaders. The N70 improves customer 
productivity by increasing wear life by more 
than a third compared to competitor systems, 
lowering fuel consumption and reducing 
maintenance costs.

Additional new technology introductions 
included GET Detect® which enables 
customers to better monitor their G.E.T in the 
field using digital sensors, helping prevent 
costly unplanned downtime when teeth 
become detached and enter downstream 
processing operations. Operator safety is also 
a big priority for its customers and the division 
is developing GET Toolhead® an innovative 
solution that automates G.E.T change-outs 
reducing the need for personnel to be in 
the pit, one of the most hazardous parts of 
the mine.

Investment has been focused on improving 
safety and upgrading foundry capacity 
to meet future demand. The division 
encountered some operational challenges at 
our Newton, Mississippi, facility during this 
upgrade process. These are temporary and 
are being resolved, with significant production 
improvement seen in Q4.

Annualised run rate cost synergies reached 
$27m by the end of 2019, well on track to 
deliver the division’s $30m target in 2020, 
significantly ahead of the original schedule. 
Good progress was also made toward the 
medium-term $50m revenue synergy target. 
This included expanding into new markets, 
building on Mineral’s global network, with both 
ESCO and Minerals collaborating to grow 
market share in new or under-served territories. 

THE DIVISION 
CONTINUED TO FOCUS 
ON DIFFERENTIATING 
THROUGH
TECHNOLOGY 
LEADERSHIP AND 
CLOSE CUSTOMER 
PROXIMITY. 

JON OWENS
Division President, Weir ESCO

JON OWENS
Division President, Weir ESCO

ESCO’s new automated toolhead

42

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

2020 OUTLOOK
ESCO shares many of the same market 
drivers as Minerals. Assuming underlying 
demand does not change, we currently 
expect the division to deliver good growth 
in constant currency revenues. Further full 
year margin progression will be supported 
by the ongoing delivery of cost and revenue 
synergies and operational improvements.

REVENUE1,3 £m

OPERATING PROFIT1,2,3 £m

£572m

+4%

£83m

+25%

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

549

572

83

66

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

TOTAL INCIDENT RATE3

HEADCOUNT (AVERAGE)3

1.59

1% increase

2,338

-4%

1.57

1.59

2,444

2,338

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

DIVISIONAL ORDERS BY END MARKET %

REVENUE BY ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT/
AFTERMARKET %

 Mining 

 Infrastructure 

 Oil & Gas 

 Industrial 

58%

28%

9%

5%

 Aftermarket 

 Original Equipment 

96%

4%

DIVISIONAL ORDERS BY GEOGRAPHY %

NUMBER OF FACILITIES

 North America 

 South America 

 Australasia 

 Europe 

 Africa 

 Asia Pacific 

 Middle East  

56%

14%

11%

7%

6%

5%

1%

 North America 

27

 South America 

 Asia Pacific 

 Australasia 

 Africa 

 Europe 

9

8

6

6

5

1 

 2018 restated at 2019 average exchange rates and reported on a proforma basis.

2  Adjusted to exclude exceptional items and intangibles amortisation.

3  ESCO was acquired in July 2018 and fully comparable data is not available.

43

TAKING WORKERS OUT 
OF HARM’S WAY
Safety is a key priority for our customers 
and our technology is helping take 
workers out of harm’s way. Our new 
automated toolhead does exactly that, 
turning a hydraulic manipulator into 
a robot arm. 

It can securely grip and move GET, 
allowing it to replace parts weighing up 
to 500kg. The movement of the toolhead 
is controlled remotely by a single 
operator, compared to teams of up to 
three people who would normally be 
required for a manual change out.

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

OPERATIONAL REVIEW 
WEIR ESCO 
CONTINUED

ESCO’s field proven Nemisys® N70 tooth system for 
wheel loaders

44

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

NEMISYS® N70: LASTS UP 
TO 36% LONGER THAN 
THE COMPETITION

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

INDUSTRY
Mineral extraction

CUSTOMER
Iron ore, North America

APPLICATION
Extreme duty-hard rock, large boulders

EQUIPMENT
Nemisys® N70 tooth system

Weir ESCO’s new Nemisys® N70 system 
is focused for the wheel loader market. 
In 2019, the technology was trialled on 
a mine site with the success of the trial 
resulting in the mine’s loader fleet being 
upgraded to N70. The N70 lasted 4 
times longer than the legacy competitor 
system and because of ESCO’s unique 
locking technology, change outs are far 
simpler and quicker. 

Analysis shows that the N70’s tooth 
system is, on average, up to 21% harder 
than the competition, while lasting 
up to 36% longer and weighing less. 
Such results have seen the division 
make 31 conversions, against a target 
of 25, with the system in 2019. 

THE N70 TOOTH 
SYSTEM REPRESENTS 
A STEP CHANGE 
IN THE MARKET 
AND OUR 31 
CONVERSIONS 
IN 2019 REFLECT 
THE VALUE IT 
CREATES FOR OUR 
CUSTOMERS. 

JON OWENS
Division President of Weir ESCO

45

 
HIGHLIGHTS

•  Uncertainty and market volatility led to 
£546m impairment of North American 
Oil & Gas

•  International markets continued to 

show further improvement

•  H2 modestly profitable supported 

by a £35m annualised costs 
saving programme 

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

OPERATIONAL REVIEW 
WEIR OIL & GAS

2019 MARKET REVIEW
In 2019, despite WTI oil prices increasing 
from $48 to $62 and averaging $57, the 
North American land rig count fell 27%. 
E&P operators in North American shifted their 
focus to cash generation over growth, with 
constrained capex budgets being exhausted 
earlier in the year than usual as operators 
priorities shifted to cash flow. This led to an 
accelerated downturn in the second half 
of the year which compounded already  
over-supplied pressure pumping markets with 
frack fleet utilisation estimated to be c.55%. 
In contrast to the first half of 2018, when 
oilfield service companies were refurbishing 
and replacing their frack fleets, 2019 saw 
significant levels of excess capacity, with 
fleets being cold-stacked and cannibalised 
for consumables, impacting both original 
equipment and aftermarket demand. As a 
result of these market conditions a number 
of major oilfield service companies announced 
they were significantly reducing their frack 
fleets with an estimated 5m horsepower 
(c.20%) withdrawn from the market.

International markets continued their steady 
recovery with increased demand for services 
and well-heads.

2019 OPERATING REVIEW
In response to these challenging market 
conditions, the division completed a £35m 
annualised cost savings programme. 
This included reducing its workforce by 
c.600 people or approximately 20%, facility 
consolidations and asset write downs.

The division continued to extend its 
technology leadership with market share 
gains including its Simplified Large Bore 
Frac System that significantly reduces the 
complexity and improves the safety of 
frack sites and delivered more than £20m 
in revenues. It also benefited from its Weir 
EDGE service offering to extend share 
in pump consumables. The division also 
launched the SPM® QEM 5000 pump which 
is capable of supporting the development of 
electric and gas turbine frack sites which have 
the potential to reduce required fleet sizes 
by 60%. 

Internationally the division made good 
progress with order wins from international 
and national oil companies including a  
four-year contract in Oman to provide  
well-head equipment and services. It is also 
developing plans to further expand its  
well-head offering in the Middle East, 
including increased manufacturing capability 
in Saudi Arabia. 

Operational improvements focused on supply 
chain enhancements and leveraging shared 
services to drive increased efficiencies across 
the division. The division also opened its 
Permian basin, Texas super centre providing 
Pressure Pumping and Pressure Control 
assembly, repair and testing facilities.

WHILST RIGHT SIZING 
THE BUSINESS, 
WE CONTINUED 
TO EXTEND OUR 
TECHNOLOGY 
LEADERSHIP 
IN 2019. 

PAUL COPPINGER
Division President, Weir Oil & Gas

PAUL COPPINGER
Division President, Weir Oil & Gas

Weir Oil & Gas’ Large Bore Frack System 
(in green)

46

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

2020 OUTLOOK
There is currently uncertainty over the 
macro outlook for the global economy and 
demand for oil which is heightened by the 
recent coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. 
In North America, industry expectations 
are for a further reduction in Exploration & 
Production expenditure in 2020, as operators 
continue to focus on capital discipline over 
growth. International markets are currently 
expected to continue their steady recovery. 
While visibility is limited, and assuming no 
significant impact from coronavirus, we 
expect the modest levels of profitability 
seen in the second half of 2019 to continue 
in 2020, with lower demand and pricing 
pressure being offset by the benefits of our 
restructuring actions.

GAINING MARKET SHARE 
THROUGH OUR LARGE BORE 
FRACK SYSTEM
The division saw good growth in its 
large bore frack system which reduces 
rig set-up time from up to 12 hours to 
just two, compared to legacy systems. 
It does this through equipment with 
fewer leak paths providing a much 
safer footprint.

Customised for any basin or condition, 
this system is designed to improve 
safety and performance, minimise 
pressure-drop and erosion – thus 
extending equipment life – reducing  
non-productive time, rig-up time, 
and material and labour costs.

REVENUE1 £m

£612m

-25%

OPERATING PROFIT1,2 £m

£37m

-64%

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

817

685

602

612

395

101

94

37

61

-7

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

TOTAL INCIDENT RATE

HEADCOUNT (AVERAGE)

0.28

49% improvement

2,905

-5%

0.85

0.82

0.62

0.55

0.28

3,244

3,038

2,905

2,795

2,192

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

DIVISIONAL ORDERS BY END MARKET %

REVENUE BY ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT/
AFTERMARKET %

 Oil & Gas 

 Other 

99%

1%

 Aftermarket 

 Original Equipment 

70%

30%

DIVISIONAL ORDERS BY GEOGRAPHY %

NUMBER OF FACILITIES

 North America 

 Middle East 

 Asia Pacific 

 Europe 

 South America 

 Australasia 

 Africa 

68%

16%

9%

4%

1%

1%

1%

 North America 

 Asia Pacific 

 Middle East & Africa 

 Australia 

 Europe 

 South America 

27

12

8

2

1

1

1  Prior years restated at 2019 average exchange rates. 

2  Adjusted to exclude exceptional items and intangibles amortisation.

47

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

OPERATIONAL REVIEW 
WEIR OIL & GAS 
CONTINUED

SPM® QEM 5000 E-FRAC 
PUMP GIVES A C. 60%  
REDUCTION IN 
OPERATING FOOTPRINT

INDUSTRY
Oil & Gas

APPLICATION
Hydraulic Fracturing

EQUIPMENT
SPM® QEM 5000 e-Frac Pump 

Frac site demands have dramatically 
expanded since 2014, lateral lengths are 
43% longer, the number of stages has 
increased 94%, sand usage is up 85% 
and horsepower-hours per well have 
increased 200%. These factors push 
conventional frac fleets to their limits. 
Frac pumps are needed to provide  
ever-increasing durability and 
performance, but with the industry’s 
goal to reduce its environmental impact, 
adding horsepower alone doesn’t 
fully meet operators’ needs. The SPM® 
QEM 5000 E-Frac Pump’s compatibility 
with non-standard drivers, including 
electric and natural gas turbines, gives 
operators the flexibility of tapping 
into the electrical grid, remote power 
generation or a natural gas turbine 
generator. The pump minimises up-front 
capital investment as it can reduce a frac 
fleet from 20 conventional pumps to 
just eight pumps. Engineered to reduce 
maintenance, operators can experience 
millions of dollars in maintenance 
savings per year of use and reduce 
maintenance personnel costs by 
potentially 40%. 

THE SPM® QEM 
5000 E-FRAC PUMP 
IS DESIGNED WITH 
THE FUTURE IN 
MIND, DELIVERING 
CUSTOMERS A 
LOWER TOTAL COST 
OF OWNERSHIP 
WHILE INCREASING 
SUSTAINABILITY. 

PAUL COPPINGER
Division President, Weir Oil & Gas

The SPM® QEM 5000 E-Frac Pump in testing in Texas

48

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

49

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

RISK MANAGEMENT

MANAGING RISK EFFECTIVELY
We operate in a complex global environment, where opportunities 
come with corresponding risks. Because our markets are dispersed 
and decentralised, our objective is to allow our people to be decisive, 
so we can take advantage of attractive opportunities whilst ensuring 
we are not exposing the organisation to excessive risk. 

The bottom-up risk reporting approach 
requires key risks identified and reported at 
project level to be escalated to the operating 
company management, which in turn may 
be escalated to divisional management, and 
ultimately to the Risk Committee and the 
Board. This is achieved through risk dashboard 
reports, which are maintained at divisional 
and Group levels. The gross dashboards 
provide a summary of the major net risks at 
each respective level, as well as a summary 
of the key mitigating controls and actions 
and resulting net risk, and any further control 
actions required. The dashboards themselves 
have been enhanced as part of the greater 
risk management process review. 

The Risk Committee monitors quarterly risk 
dashboard reports from the divisions. It has 
oversight of the Group Risk Dashboard, along 
with a routine review of key controls identified 
to manage each risk and the sources of 
controls assurance. The Board obtains 
assurance over risks and risk management 
through the internal control framework. 
More information on the internal control 
framework can be found within the Corporate 
Governance Report on page 89 and within the 
Audit Committee Report on page 95.

The specific risks identified across the 
business generally fall under one of the 
categories within the ‘Risk Universe’ as 
shown overleaf.

THE RISK AGENDA
During the year, the Board approved that the 
risk management process be reviewed to 
ensure its effectiveness and relevance in the 
current climate. An external benchmarking 
exercise to align with industry best practice 
was carried out and input from the key 
stakeholders was sought both resulting in 
enhancements to the process. 

Following this, the Board ran a workshop to 
review the key principal risks and performed 
horizon scanning to identify emerging 
risks. These activities meet the Board’s 
responsibilities in connection with Risk 
Management and Internal Control set out in 
the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018.

The aim of the Risk Appetite Statement 
remains to highlight the risks that we should 
be willing to take, as well as those that are 
unacceptable. The statement includes a series 
of risk assertions which are aligned to our 
strategy, together with the risk parameters 
within which we expect our people to work. 

The risk appetite is all the risk assertions 
and the parameters taken together. 
The parameters can apply to more than 
one risk assertion; therefore, the individual 
risk assertions should not be read in 
isolation. As part of the aforementioned risk 
management process review the risk appetite 
of specific key principal risks were reviewed, 
resulting in some updates to the risk appetite. 

Compliance with the Risk Appetite Statement 
is monitored through the Group’s functional 
and front-line controls, including oversight 
and reporting mechanisms. The Board will 
continue to review and update the Risk 
Appetite Statement annually. 

Details of the review of the internal control 
and risk management systems undertaken 
during the year are contained in the Audit 
Committee Report on page 95.

RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk management is at the core of the 
internal control framework. We have a risk 
management policy which defines how we 
expect risks to be identified, assessed and 
managed throughout the organisation.

Risks are assessed and quantified in terms 
of impact and likelihood of occurrence, 
both before and after control mitigation. 
Assessing the gross risk before control 
mitigation allows the business to review the 
relative impact of the existing controls by 
comparing the gross and net risk assessment. 
Also, it allows the business to avoid 
expending resources on mitigating controls 
and actions, which have a negligible impact on 
the risk assessment.

The impact of risks is quantified across a 
range of factors including financial; strategy; 
reputation; people and property; ability to 
perform services; regulation; Safety, Health 
and Environment; investors and funding. 
The risk management policy includes defined 
criteria for each risk impact all the way up to 
Group level assessments, thereby providing 
an integrated bottom-up and top-down 
approach to risk management.

Ultimately, the Board is responsible for the 
Group’s risk and internal control framework. 
It has set out the decisions, and hence 
the level of risk, which can be delegated 
to the Group Executive and divisional and 
operational company management without 
requiring escalation. This is articulated in 
a series of Group policies and delegated 
authority matrices, as well as the parameters 
within the approved Risk Appetite Statement. 
The Board and Committee structure can be 
viewed on page 77.

50

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

RISK UNIVERSE
Strategic risk

•  Industry and market volatility

•  Technological advances or disruption

•  Pricing pressures

•  Acquisitions and mergers

•  Planning and resource allocation 

Hazard risk

•  Political and social instability

•  Natural disasters and other major incidents

•  External and internal fraud and corruption

Operational risk

•  People

•  Delivery and supply chain

•  Quality

•  Commercial

•  IT

Compliance risk

•  Laws and regulations

•  Code of Conduct

•  Safety, Health and Environment

•  Governance

•  Intellectual property

Financial risk

•  Financial management

•  Credit

•  Debt and interest rates

•  Foreign exchange

•  Accounting and reporting

•  Taxation

Not all risks are controllable or foreseeable, 
a key example being natural disasters. 
Our response to such risks is having controls 
which lessen the impact to our business 
should they occur. For example, in the case 
of natural disasters, we have controls in place 
to reduce the risk of harm to our people, as 
well as response planning protocols, with 
clear accountability, to minimise disruption to 
operations and our customers.

I

I

P
O
L
C
E
S
&
D
E
C
S
O
N
S

I

I

RISK RESPONSIBILITIES & REPORTING

BOARD AND SUB-COMMITTEES

GROUP EXECUTIVE

RISK COMMITTEE

DIVISIONAL MANAGEMENT

OPERATING COMPANY MANAGEMENT

I

G
N
T
R
O
P
E
R

RISK MANAGEMENT CYCLE

MONITOR,  
ASSURE AND 
REPORT

IDENTIFY 
FURTHER ACTIONS 
AND CONTROLS 
REQUIRED

IDENTIFY 
THE RISK

QUANTIFY 
THE NET RISK

QUANTIFY 
THE GROSS 
RISK

IDENTIFY 
THE EXISTING 
MITIGATING 
ACTIONS AND 
CONTROLS

51

 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

RISK MANAGEMENT
CONTINUED

RISK APPETITE STATEMENT
The Weir Group is strategically positioned in markets with good long-term growth prospects. We will pursue ambitious growth targets, 
and we are willing to accept a higher level of risk to increase the likelihood of achieving or exceeding our strategic priorities, subject to the 
parameters below. 

Risk assertions

Risk parameters

1. Organic growth 
We will rigorously pursue divisional organic growth strategies to meet our 
market growth objectives.

2. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) 
We will actively pursue M&A opportunities that enhance our strategic 
platform subject to meeting investment criteria.

3. Returns and profitability 
We will not pursue growth at all costs, however, we expect high margins, 
strong returns on capital and working capital discipline together with 
cash generation.

4. Capital allocation 
We will encourage capital expenditure in pursuit of our growth ambitions 
subject to Internal Rate of Return (IRR) hurdles and capital structure targets.

5. Capital structure 
We are prepared to use leverage in pursuit of our growth agenda and will 
actively seek low cost debt to fund the Group but, recognising cyclicality 
in our end markets, will maintain significant headroom against our 
financial covenants.

6. Reputation and stakeholders 
We will avoid/manage situations or actions that could have a negative impact 
on our reputation and stakeholders. We aim to be transparent with all of our 
stakeholders unless prejudicial to our collective interests.

Investment of resources will be consistent with divisional strategies and 
expected divisional compound annual growth rates over five year plans.

Post-tax returns should exceed our cost of capital within three years of 
the acquisition.

Short-term margin dilution is acceptable in gaining market entry but over the 
cycle we aim for top quartile operating margins and returns on capital.

Local country cash flow projections for investment appraisal purposes 
discounted at country specific rates to account for risk weighted returns.

We will seek to maintain the ratio of net debt/EBITDA below two times (current 
financial covenants 3.5 times) and will retain adequate headroom within our 
debt facilities at all times.

No tolerance for breaches of:

•  Legislative/statutory requirements.
•  Weir Code of Conduct.
•  International sanctions.
•  Delegated authority levels.
•  Group and divisional policies.

7. Safety, Health and Environment (SHE) 
We will not undertake or pursue activities that pose unacceptable hazard 
or risk to our people, the communities in which we operate, or the 
broader environment.

•  No tolerance for breaches of Weir Group Safety, Health and 

Environment Charter.

•  Active community and environmental engagement is expected.
•  Target zero harm through continuous improvement.

8. Country presence 
We are prepared to enter new countries which offer opportunities for growth 
consistent with our overall strategy. We will not enter, or will exit, countries 
which present a high risk of harm to our people, damage to our reputation, or 
breach of international sanctions.

No tolerance for breaches of:

•  Legislative/statutory requirements.
•  Weir Code of Conduct.
•  International sanctions.
•  Delegated authority levels.
•  Group and divisional policies.

9. Innovation 
We will invest in technology, research and development to innovate our 
customer offering allowing us to maintain and expand our market share.

Target research and development spend of 2% of revenues.

52

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The key roles and responsibilities for risk management are set out below.

Group

Risk management responsibilities

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

E
C
N
E
F
E
D
F
O
E
N
L
D
R
H
T

I

I

E
C
N
E
F
E
D
F
O
E
N
I
L
D
N
O
C
E
S

E
C
N
E
F
E
D
F
O
E
N
L
T
S
R
F

I

I

Board 
Overall responsibility for the Group’s 
risk management and internal control 
frameworks, and strategic decisions within 
the Group.

Audit Committee 
Delegated responsibility from the Board to 
review the effectiveness of the Group’s risk 
and internal control frameworks.

Group Executive 
Executive Committee with overall 
responsibility for managing the Group to 
ensure it achieves its strategic objectives.

•  Annual review and ongoing monitoring of the effectiveness of the risk management and internal 

control frameworks.

•  Annual review of the Group’s risk appetite.
•  Principal risks presented three times a year. 
•  On a bi-annual basis, receive a report from the Risk Committee which sets out the current 

assessment of each principal risk, the effect of mitigating controls on each risk, the direction 
of travel of each risk versus the prior year, the extent to which each could potentially impact 
the Group’s strategic goals and any relevant findings relating to significant control failings or 
weaknesses which have been identified. 

•  Taking decisions in accordance with the delegated authority matrices.

•  Annual assessment of the effectiveness of the risk management and internal control frameworks.
•  Review of reports from the internal and external auditors.
•  Review of the results from the six-monthly self-assessment compliance scorecards.

•  Managing risks which have the potential to impact the delivery of the Group’s strategic objectives.
•  Monitoring business performance, in particular key performance indicators relating to 

strategic objectives.

•  Taking strategic decisions in accordance with the delegated authority matrices.
•  Escalating issues to the Board as required.

Risk Committee
Management Committee responsible 
for governance of the Group’s Risk 
Management Policy and Framework.

•  Review of the design and operation of the Group’s Risk Management Policy and Framework.
•  Identification and assessment of the key risks facing the Group, identification of the key controls 

mitigating those risks and identification of further actions where necessary.

•  Review of the Divisional Risk Dashboards, considering the appropriateness of management’s 

Chief Executive’s Safety Committee 
Safety Committee with responsibility to set 
and monitor the Group’s SHE principles, 
priorities and actions.

Excellence Committees 
•  Engineering
•  Safety, Health and Environment
•  Finance 
•  HR
•  Group Information Services
•  Group Compliance (sub-function of Legal)
Management Committees with 
representatives from across the 
Group in their respective areas of focus.
The Committees govern activities 
and performance in the individual 
functional areas.

Divisional management 
Responsible for managing the businesses 
within the divisions to ensure divisional 
strategic objectives are achieved and there 
is compliance with Group policies and 
standards throughout their division.

Operating company management 
Responsible for ensuring company 
objectives are achieved and business 
activities are conducted in accordance 
with Group policies and standards.

responses to identified risks and assessing whether there are any gaps.

•  Reporting key Group and divisional risks to the Board.

•  Executive Committee representation to drive improvements in our safety performance throughout 

the Group.

•  Monitoring the management of key risks across the Group associated with the respective remits 

of the Excellence Committees.

•  Monitoring performance and compliance with Group objectives, policies and standards related 

to the respective remits of the Excellence Committees.

•  Taking decisions in accordance with the delegated authority matrices.
•  Escalating issues to the Group Executive as required.
•  Reviewing the results from relevant assurance activities.
•  Design and administration of the Group’s compliance programme covering core areas including 

anti-bribery, anti-corruption, anti-trust, privacy, trade controls and human rights.

•  Managing risks which have the potential to impact the delivery of the division’s strategic objectives.
•  Monitoring performance and compliance with Group objectives, policies and standards within the 

divisions and with regard to the outputs from the Excellence Committees.

•  Taking decisions in accordance with the delegated authority matrices.
•  Escalating issues to the Group Executive as required.
•  Reviewing the results from relevant assurance activities.

•  Managing risks which have the potential to impact the delivery of their company’s 

strategic objectives.

•  Monitoring performance and compliance with Group objectives, policies and standards within 

their company.

•  Taking decisions in accordance with the delegated authority matrices.
•  Escalating issues to divisional management and Excellence Committees as required.
•  Reviewing the results from relevant assurance activities.

53

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

As in any business, there are risks and uncertainties which could impact the Group’s ability  
to achieve its objectives in the future. The Group’s risk management and assurance framework is 
designed to make this less likely by clearly identifying and seeking to mitigate these keys risks.

The Board has conducted a robust 
assessment of the principal risks, alongside 
the Risk Appetite Statement set out on 
page 52 meeting the Board’s responsibilities 
in connection with Risk Management and 
Internal Control details in the UK Corporate 
Governance Code. Each of the principal risks 
is assigned an owner from amongst the Board 
or Group Senior Management team and a 
detailed review of each principal risk has been 
completed in the year. 

The Group’s risk registers were reviewed 
and validity of the existing prior year principal 
risks were reassessed and consideration was 
given as to whether any new principal risks 
have emerged, or certain risks are no longer 
considered to be a principal risk. This review 
resulted in changes being made to the 
principal risks in 2019. 

The identified principal risks were subjected 
to a detailed assessment based on the 
following considerations: 

•  Severity of each risk relative to the Group’s 

stated risk appetite; 

•  Existence and effectiveness of actions and 
internal controls which serve to mitigate 
the risk; 

•  The overall effectiveness of the Group’s 

control environment, including assurance 
and any identified control weakness; and 
•  The extent to which each of the principal 
risks could impact the Group’s viability in 
financial or operational terms, due to their 
potential effects on the business plan, 
solvency or liquidity. 

The principal risks set out on pages 54 to 
59 are those which we believe to have the 
greatest potential to impact our ability to 
achieve the Group’s strategic objectives or 
which have the greatest potential impact on 
the Group’s solvency or liquidity.

KEY

Strategy

People

Technology

Customers

Performance

Risk Trend

Increasing

No change

Decreasing

Viability Statement

V

Viability Statement

READ MORE 
PAGE 90

MARKET VOLATILITY 

V

Changes in key markets, including commodity prices affecting mining and oil and gas, have an adverse impact on customers’ 
expenditure plans. Fundamental market structure changes could alter the long-term economics of the business.

Impact on strategy Why we think this is important

How we are mitigating the risk

Changes during 2019

We need to remain sufficiently 
flexible to allow us to anticipate 
downturns, to allow us to adjust 
our operations accordingly, and 
equally to meet growth in demand 
when our customers’ markets 
are buoyant and therefore capital 
investment is high. Otherwise, we 
are at risk of incurring unnecessary 
costs during downturns, and not 
maximising our potential for growth 
in buoyant markets.

We maintain regular engagement 
with our customers to understand 
their needs and challenges, 
and ensure our business is 
appropriately aligned.

Improved demand planning and 
forecasting including Sales and 
Operations Planning within VCE.

Our strategic planning utilises 
extensive market intelligence to 
assist in forecasting opportunities 
and dips in markets.

We maintain contingency plans 
for downturns.

We continue to focus on customer 
relationships, technology 
development and Value Chain 
Excellence to manage this risk. 
The risk trend is increased to reflect 
the shorter cycle nature of our North 
American oil and gas markets and 
the associated challenging market 
conditions. We have responded 
to this with a £35m cost saving 
programme and our intention to 
seek to maximise value from our Oil 
& Gas Division at the right time. 

Risk trend

54

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

TECHNOLOGY 

V

Failure of the Group to embrace technology and innovate and continue to develop and invest in both our core product offering and 
technologically advanced next generation, sustainable solutions and services for our customers, leaves the Group exposed in the 
defence of its market leading positions and ability to deliver on its growth ambitions. 

Impact on strategy Why we think this is important

How we are mitigating the risk

Changes during 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

This risk was updated and expanded 
to reflect the risk of failure to 
embrace technology. 

Risk trend

The Technology Vision & Strategy 
is in place defining the strategic 
technology innovation arenas and 
Weir Innovation Network strategic 
approach. External partnering 
to provide horizon technology 
scanning service. 

Advanced Manufacturing Centres 
established at key manufacturing site 
to develop new intellectual property. 

We need to continue to drive 
innovation across the Group and 
collaborate with research partners 
to ensure there is a sustainable and 
evolving product offering leveraging 
new and adjacent technologies. 

This can result in failure to 
achieve and maximise the 
expected sales opportunities 
from new product launches and 
technological advances. 

Failure to adapt our business 
model to capture economic value 
from technological advances or 
prevent economic loss from other 
technological advances. 

Failure to develop products meeting 
the sustainable needs of our 
customers and other stakeholders.

DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION 

Failure to adapt to the digital transformation & changing business models in our end markets and adopt established digital 
foundations across the Group, results in an uncompetitive, underperforming or an incompatible digital product offering which 
negatively affect the Weir brand and loses connection with our customers. 

Impact on strategy Why we think this is important

How we are mitigating the risk

Changes during 2019

The rapidly changing digital 
landscape, rate of technological 
advances and ever increasing 
levels of automation will impact 
the business, if we fail to anticipate 
these changes and keep pace with 
market and customer expectations. 

Failure to manage this risk can 
result in loss of market share due 
to disruptive technologies and 
advances in technology offerings 
from competitors. 

Our existing research and 
development initiatives within 
the business, at Weir Advanced 
Research Centre, are enhanced 
through partnerships with certain 
leading universities around the world. 
These partnerships are designed 
to help the Group develop  
game-changing solutions to our 
customers’ challenges and respond 
to their changing needs.

We devote skilled resource to 
reviewing and responding to 
developing technologies, with our 
agreements with specialist external 
parties to develop Internet of Things 
(IoT) technology.

Engineering strategies are in place 
at Group and divisional levels with 
strategic innovation areas defined as 
part of the innovation strategy.

Technological innovation continues 
to be at the forefront of the business 
due to the increasingly competitive 
market and the pressure to provide 
customers solutions to improve the 
efficiency of their operations.

Further information on progress 
made in this area is set out on 
page 21.

Continued execution of the 
Technology Vision and Strategy 
through the year. The Innovation 
Strategy process has been 
defined, organisational structures 
established, and Group and 
divisional engineering strategies are 
in place.

Risk trend

55

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
CONTINUED

COMPETITION 

V

Increasing presence of low cost competitors with improving quality in our end markets leads to significant pricing pressure and 
margin deterioration. Disruptive technologies or new entrants with alternative business models could also reduce our ability to 
sustainably win future business, achieve operating results and realise future growth opportunities. Continuing threat from 
third-party replicators. 

Impact on strategy Why we think this is important

How we are mitigating the risk

Changes during 2019

Horizon scanning for competitor 
threats including patent searches 
and applications. 

This risk is new in the current year. 

Risk trend

Continued development of 
operational efficiency and 
improvement plans. 

Technology solutions with 
differentiation on engineering 
expertise, aftermarket service 
and price.

Increasing presence of low cost 
competitors with improving quality 
in our end markets can lead to 
significant pricing pressures and 
market deterioration.

Increased competition forces a 
continual release of longer wear 
life products resulting in reducing 
our sales volumes with difficulty in 
realising commercial benefits. 

Disruptive technologies or new 
entrants with alternative business 
models could also reduce our ability 
to sustainably win future business, 
achieve operating results and realise 
future growth opportunities. 

VALUE CHAIN EXCELLENCE 

V

Failure to achieve Value Chain Excellence improvements and the associated reduction in costs and enhanced capital efficiency. 

Impact on strategy Why we think this is important

How we are mitigating the risk

Changes during 2019

Value Chain Excellence is a key 
area of strategic focus for the 
Group with Value Chain Excellence 
initiatives continually developing 
and the Group realising the benefits 
of these.

Value Chain Excellence is embedded 
into the divisions allowing for 
Global and divisional supply chain 
communities to share best practice 
and leverage economies of scale. 

Risk trend

If we fail to improve our value chain 
management, we risk:

Regular KPI monitoring of the value 
chain throughout the organisation.

•  Failing to meet our customer 
needs in terms of product 
volume, quality and delivery, 
through a failure in internal and 
external supply chains resulting in 
a loss of reputation and sales; 
•  Failure to optimise our inventory 

thus inhibiting the Group 
investment strategy and creating 
slow moving and obsolete 
inventory ultimately impacting 
our results; 

•  Failure to manage potential 

above inflationary increases in 
procurement costs as commodity 
prices increase thereby reducing 
our cost competitiveness and 
margins; and

•  Failure to develop organisational 
capability to sustain and improve 
operational performance results. 

Value Chain Excellence initiatives 
have been operating throughout 
the Group to drive value chain 
improvements including expanding 
production in best cost countries.

The Group’s forward purchase 
commitments are being 
closely monitored to manage 
inventories at levels appropriate to 
market conditions.

Our credit risk management 
procedures are under continuous 
appraisal and review.

We regularly monitor market activity 
to ensure we remain competitive.

56

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY 

Adverse effect of climate change and environmental events including extreme weather impacting our business, our customers 
and our supply chain. Failure to adapt to changes in legal, technological, social or market dynamics could affect our 
competitiveness, reputation, and ability to attract and retain talent. 

Impact on strategy Why we think this is important

How we are mitigating the risk

Changes during 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

This is a new risk in 2019. 

A new Chief Strategy and 
Sustainability Officer position 
appointed to the Group Executive. 

Risk trend

Failure to manage this risk could 
have significant impacts on us, our 
customers and our supply chain. 
These impacts could be both 
physical and transitional. 

Furthermore, failure to manage 
these risks may have political 
and legal implications following 
increased governmental focus. 

Our Technology Strategy in place has 
a significant environmental focus 
and our new sustainability roadmap 
further underpins our strategic 
priorities with clear and appropriately 
stretching goals.

We are continuing strong 
engagement with stakeholders in 
this area. 

There are also wider implications 
of this risk including loss of market 
share, negative impact on reputation 
and failure to attract talent into 
the organisation. 

We evolve our environmental 
reporting processes and governance, 
including external rating submissions 
FTSE4Good, CDP, DJSI, etc to ensure 
robust foundations.

INFORMATION SECURITY AND RESILIENCE 

V

Failure to maintain the critical business systems and IT infrastructure required to meet the operational needs of the business. 
Failure to minimise disruption to business operations because of changes to business systems, including during planned 
transformation activities. Failure to adequately protect core business and stakeholders from cyber crime and other information 
security risk.

Impact on strategy Why we think this is important

How we are mitigating the risk

Changes during 2019

Failure to adequately protect and 
preserve the confidentiality, integrity 
and availability of information and 
systems from accidental, adversarial 
or environmental threats could 
lead to operational, reputational, 
regulatory or financial impact. 

We have an IT Governance 
Framework with a focus on 
structured change management 
techniques, including setting project 
governance levels in line with risk.

Policies, procedures and baseline 
standards in relation to cyber risk 
and IT security more generally are 
continuously updated and rolled out 
to operations. A programme of user 
training in relation to cyber risk is 
in place.

All security related incidents are 
reported to the Group Executive.

Security Incident Responder teams 
monitor our various security systems.

IT security and continuity continues 
to be a matter of strategic priority 
for the Group in an environment 
of increasingly sophisticated 
cyber security threats. Progress to 
strengthen the Group’s defences in 
this respect is being made through 
our IT transformational programme.

A new Chief Information Officer 
position was appointed to the Group 
Executive. We continually review 
the effectiveness of our key IT 
security controls in consultation with 
external experts. We report upon 
any unplanned outages and potential 
security breaches, with lessons 
learned across the Group.

There is also a continued focus on 
the area from Internal Audit. 

Risk trend

57

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
CONTINUED

SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT (SHE) 

V

Failure to adequately protect our people and other stakeholders from harm associated with a breach in SHE standards.

Impact on strategy Why we think this is important

How we are mitigating the risk

Changes during 2019

We operate in hazardous 
environments, and therefore have 
a fundamental duty to protect our 
people and other stakeholders 
from harm whilst conducting our 
business. As well as the personal 
impact on our people resulting from 
a failure to meet this obligation, we 
would also be at risk of: 

•  Reputational damage leading to a 

loss of customers;

•  Legal action from regulators, 

including fines and penalties; and
•  Exclusion from markets important 

for our future growth.

The Group continued to drive 
its safety agenda in 2019 which 
included the prioritisation of ESCO 
being fully integrated and aligned to 
the Weir global SHE standards. 

SHE also featured prominently 
in the Group’s global employee 
engagement survey programme 
which was rolled out in 2019. 

The Group continues to monitor the 
potential impact of the Coronavirus 
(COVID -19), on its operations 
and people.

Risk trend

The Weir Behavioural Safety system 
is in place to reduce the risk of 
safety incidents.

In addition, there are initiatives to 
prevent the most common accident 
types. The Weir global SHE standards 
are continually reviewed.

The SHE Excellence Committee 
is responsible for monitoring 
performance and compliance with 
Group objectives, policies and 
standards relating to SHE.

The Chief Executive’s Safety 
Committee meets monthly and is 
committed to achieving the highest 
of SHE standards.

There is a formal SHE assurance 
programme with issues 
escalated as required through the 
reporting structures.

STAFF RECRUITMENT, DEVELOPMENT AND RETENTION

Failure to recruit, develop or retain key management and staff may lead to disruption to the Group’s operations, functions 
and processes.

Impact on strategy Why we think this is important

How we are mitigating the risk

Changes during 2019

Our people represent our biggest 
asset and failure to attract, develop 
and retain key management and 
staff would have a detrimental 
impact on the Group’s ability to 
deliver our key strategic objectives.

The Talent Development and 
Succession Planning process 
is being further developed.

Global employee engagement 
surveys were completed.

All-employee share ownership 
plan was launched globally. 
Global HR management system 
being deployed. 

Risk trend

Promotion of the Weir Group Values 
& Behaviours, Code of Conduct 
and HR Policies sets the standards 
and expectations for all of our staff, 
reinforcing our stated commitment 
to attracting and retaining the very 
best people.

High performer assessments are 
undertaken to identify and develop 
our very best talent.

Succession plans are in place and 
periodically reviewed for all of our 
key management.

Personal Development Plans are 
set and reviewed for the effective 
development of all of our staff.

We continue to offer competitive 
compensation and benefits packages.

Personal development programmes 
including Weir University and the 
Weir Leadership Programme are 
open to participation by high potential 
staff members and these continue to 
attract high calibre individuals. 

58

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

POLITICAL AND SOCIAL 

V

Adverse political action, or political and social instability, in territories in which we operate may result in strategic, financial or 
personnel loss to the Group.

Impact on strategy Why we think this is important

How we are mitigating the risk

Changes during 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

We operate across the globe and 
therefore have to work within a 
wide range of political and social 
conditions. Adverse events may 
occur in the territories in which we 
operate that may require us to act 
swiftly to protect our people and our 
property, and regulatory changes 
could impact our competitiveness. 
We need to be flexible and able to 
anticipate such issues.

Expansions into new territories 
are only undertaken after rigorous 
assessment of the risks, including 
the social and political situation 
within the territory.

Regular review of market attractiveness. 
Monitoring travel by Weir employees to 
higher risk locations in accordance with 
the Weir Group travel policy.

External expert risk assessments and 
regular monitoring in higher risk locations.

Contingency plans and exit 
strategy planning.

Our strategic planning assists in fore-
casting potential political and social 
instability in regions. 

Continued assessment of global tariffs. 

Proactive monitoring of evolving policy 
and development of contingency plans as 
situations materialise.

The geopolitical risk landscape 
remained unsettled throughout 
2019 resulting in an increase 
in the frequency and rigour of 
the Group’s monitoring over a 
range of exposures including 
the political situation in the 
Middle East and the potential 
business impact of Brexit.

Risk trend

ETHICS AND GOVERNANCE 

V

Interactions with our people, customers, suppliers and other stakeholders are not conducted with the highest standards of 
integrity which devalues our reputation and/or introduces a level of contractual risk above our appetite. 

Impact on strategy Why we think this is important

How we are mitigating the risk

Changes during 2019

The governance and legislative 
environment in which the 
Group operates continues 
to evolve and become more 
complex. We routinely review 
operations in geographies 
where ethical standards may 
not be as well established as in 
other countries.

Policies continue to be updated 
and rolled out including Data 
Privacy and Anti-Corruption.

Compliance risk assessments 
have been completed in several 
high risk locations. 

Risk trend

We are unwilling to accept 
dishonest or corrupt behaviour from 
our people, or external parties acting 
on our behalf, whilst conducting 
our business. If we fail to act with 
integrity, we are at risk of:

•  Reputational damage leading to 

The Code of Conduct, supplemented with 
Group policies on related topics, provides 
a clear benchmark for how we expect our 
business will be conducted.

Regular training is provided using a range 
of mechanisms including Town Hall style 
sessions, online and induction training.

a loss of customers;

•  Increased scrutiny 
from regulators;

•  Legal action from regulators 
including fines, penalties 
and imprisonment; 

•  Exclusion from markets important 

for our future growth;

•  Failure to meet required social 

standards to maintain licence to 
operate in our communities; and

•  Failure to comply with Group’s 

process may lead to businesses 
committing to onerous contract 
terms or conditions. 
We expect all areas of the 
business to do the right thing and 
conduct business in compliance 
with procedures, applicable laws, 
Weir Group operating policies 
and procedures, and the highest 
ethical standards.

The financial control framework is 
continually monitored for effectiveness.

Internal Audit’s remit includes regular 
review of the anti-bribery and corruption 
and financial controls across the Group. 
The Group Legal team is responsible for 
monitoring compliance with the Code 
of Conduct.

The compliance ’sub- function’ within 
Group Legal continues to enhance global 
focus on compliance. 

A whistleblower hotline is 
available to all members of staff. 
Reports are investigated on a timely basis 
and summary reports provided to Group 
Executive and Board.

59

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

SUSTAINABILITY REVIEW

EMBEDDING SUSTAINABILITY
Weir Group’s purpose is to enable the sustainable and efficient delivery of the 
natural resources essential to create a better future for the world. This ensures that 
sustainability is at the very core of our strategy.

SUSTAINABILITY IS 
AT THE VERY CORE OF 
OUR STRATEGY. 

PAULA COUSINS
Chief Strategy and Sustainability Officer

The remaining issues formed the basis 
of our sustainable foundations.

This enabled us to develop our sustainability 
roadmap with transparent defined ambition 
and goals for each strategic priority 
underpinned by robust and transparent 
sustainable foundations. 

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 
GOALS (SDGS)
We support the UN Sustainable Development 
Goals and our sustainability priority areas can 
meaningfully support the achievement of 
eight of the seventeen SDGs. 

PAULA COUSINS
Chief Strategy and 
Sustainability Officer

WHY SUSTAINABILITY 
MATTERS TO WEIR
Embedding sustainability throughout our 
organisation protects and creates long-term 
value for all our stakeholders, both internal 
and external, and will secure the long-term 
future of Weir. 

We have a meaningful role to play in making 
our markets more sustainable through 
innovation and technology. The positive 
impact we can enable our customers to 
achieve is significantly greater than that of our 
own and is therefore where we can be truly 
game changing.

OUR APPROACH TO SUSTAINABILITY
Sustainability is a wide, and expanding, 
subject so we have chosen to focus diligently 
on where we can create the biggest impact. 
By aligning our organisation around clear 
priorities and goals, we believe we can 
deliver significant positive outcomes for all 
our stakeholders. 

We will continue to mature these 
priorities and goals over time but will 
maintain this focused approach to ensure 
maximum impact.

SUSTAINABILITY ROADMAP
In early 2019, we started on our journey to 
develop our first Sustainability Roadmap. 
Our objective was to identify and embed our 
most material sustainability priorities into our 
core business strategy. 

To achieve this we first conducted a 
materiality assessment, consulting a range 
of internal and external stakeholder groups. 
This extensive engagement included 
interviews and surveys with some of Weir 
Group’s key customers, investors, employees 
and senior leadership team.

The consultation allowed our stakeholders 
to prioritise a set of 12 sustainability issues. 
These issues were spread across three 
thematic areas:

•  Environmental & Technology
•  Social & Human
•  Governance & Economic

The stakeholders each assessed the most 
significant actual or potential impacts for 
Weir from their perspective. 

The result of this materiality assessment 
identified four clear strategic sustainability 
priority areas for Weir Group where we 
can deliver the most significant value. 

60

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

In 2019 we co-created our sustainability roadmap engaging all our key stakeholders to identify the highest business 
value Group-wide priorities that will deliver tangible value across the Group, these are explained in more detail on 
pages 62-65. 

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

ZERO TIR

ENABLING
NET ZERO

LEADING
eNPS SCORE

50%
REDUCTION
IN CO2e 
BY 2030

61

SOLUTIONSCREATING SUSTAINABLECIRCULARITYPRODUCTS IN USEDESIGN ANDSUPPLY CHAINWELLBEINGHEALTH &FIRSTSAFETYENVIRONMENTALSAFEGUARDINGINCLUSION &DIVERSITYENGAGEMENTPARTNERSHIPSCOMMUNITYWASTECO2eWATERFOOTPRINTREDUCING OURZERO HARMCHAMPIONINGNURTURING OURUNIQUE CULTURE 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

SUSTAINABILITY REVIEW
CONTINUED

NURTURING OUR UNIQUE CULTURE

OUR GOALS

ENGAGEMENT 
•  Sustain leading eNPS in our 

all employee surveys

INCLUSION AND DIVERSITY 
•  Foster equal opportunities for all

COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS
•  Make a positive contribution 
to the communities in which 
we operate

IN SUPPORT OF UN SDGs

LEADING
eNPS SCORE

employee voice channels, is their desire to 
see Weir become an even more inclusive 
culture. In response, we created Weir’s first 
global Inclusion & Diversity (I&D) Steering 
Committee to help shape our approach to 
diversity going forward. The Committee 
comprises 15 diverse employees, who 
represent many of Weir’s regions and 
businesses. We also considered the insights 
from a range of listening and learning 
opportunities on I&D which allowed us to 
develop strategic aims and objectives and 
the creation of our first global I&D strategy. 
In 2019, we had 2,245 female employees and 
12,442 male employees1. Our gender pay 
information can be found on page 117.

Community Partnerships
We believe that any investment in a 
community should create a meaningful 
and sustainable positive impact on that 
community. It should be relevant to the local 
needs, aligned with our business and carried 
out in partnership with local organisations. 
We are committed to focusing on projects 
with strong educational, health and 
community themes. In 2019 the total amount 
of charitable donations made was £577,770.

CHARITABLE DONATIONS 2019

 Community 

 Education 

 Health 

54%

36%

10%

We support local communities through 
charitable contributions and by encouraging 
employees to donate their time to community 
and charitable initiatives. To engage with 
our wider communities, we hold family and 
community days where we invite our local 
community to join us on site so we can share 
with them what we do. Some of our facilities 
also run ‘Take Your Child to Work’ events 
where we create an engaging,  
hands-on experience for our employees’ 
children, introducing them to Weir, and 
showing them what it’s like to work at a global 
engineering company, and the possibilities 
available for a STEM based career. 

NEXT STEPS
Engagement
•  Continue to foster genuine and meaningful 

dialogue with employees

•  Global roll-out of evolved ‘We are Weir’
•  Continue to develop and implement 

Weir ShareBuilder

Inclusion and Diversity
•  Create a diverse workforce and truly 

inclusive culture where all people have 
equal opportunity

•  Launch I&D engagement and 

training campaign

Community Partnerships
•  Develop local community partnership plans

KEY ACTIONS IN 2019
Engagement
We launched our first ever global survey 
in late 2018, meaning that we entered into 
2019 with valuable insights from our global 
employee population on the areas they 
think we do well on, and on what else we 
can do to become an even better place to 
work. We repeated the survey in June 2019, 
receiving an excellent response rate with 
some 86% of employees taking part. That’s 
almost 12,700 Weir voices telling us what 
they think about working here.

In total, across both surveys, we now have 
over 200,000 comments from employees 
which we’ve spent time exploring and acting 
upon in our local teams across the globe. 
To support this effort, we equipped leaders 
with a range of resources to support them in 
putting in place sustainable action plans that 
will lead to positive changes for their teams. 

We introduced ‘Meet the Board’ sessions, in 
2019 which we held in Fort Worth, US (June) 
and in Santiago, Chile (October). This allowed 
deep and honest conversations between 
local employees and Board members on 
the issues that matter the most to our 
employees. Furthermore, we introduced 
a regular Employee Insights Report which 
identifies key trends across all employee 
voice channels. This Insights Report included 
insights for Board consideration on a range 
of topics including inclusion and diversity, 
safety, sustainability and on a number of 
other broader aspects relating to the overall 
employee experience, such as our working 
environments and our culture.

Inclusion and Diversity
One of the key areas of feedback from 
employees, both in the survey and other 

1  Continuing operations only.

62

UNIQUE CULTURENURTURING OURPARTNERSHIPSCOMMUNITYENGAGEMENTINCLUSION &DIVERSITY 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

CHAMPIONING ZERO HARM

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

OUR GOALS

SAFETY FIRST 
•  Aspire to Zero TIR

HEALTH AND WELLBEING 
•  Promote Health and Wellbeing 

in line with local needs

ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARDING
•  Drive continuous 

environmental improvement

ZERO TIR

IN SUPPORT OF UN SDGs

KEY ACTIONS IN 2019
Safety First
2019 has seen Weir make significant progress 
towards our vision for a Zero Harm workplace. 
A particular focus has been on accelerating 
the maturity of ESCO Division’s Safety Health 
and Environment (SHE) culture. The Minerals 
and Oil & Gas Divisions have delivered 
exceptional results, which given the Group’s 
focus on ESCO, is a ringing endorsement 
of the strength of our safety culture and the 
overall effectiveness of our SHE management 
system in delivering continuous improvement. 
The year’s achievement has been further 
reinforced by the results of our Employee 
Engagement Survey, in which the two SHE 
related drivers were the highest scoring for 
the Group and demonstrated the belief our 
people have in this priority. 

Environmental Safeguarding
Managing environmental risk is key to our 
operations. Weir SHE standards detail our 
minimum standards for controlling risks to air, 
land and water. 

No significant environmental incidents, 
penalties or fines were reported at sites under 
the operational control of the Group during 
the year ending 31 December 2019. 

Across our sites we achieved an average 
score of 73% across the environmental 
section of our SHE management 
system audit1. 

NEXT STEPS
Safety First
•  Support ESCO to further improve its safety 
performance and integration into the Weir 
SHE management system

•  Continue to develop safety conversations
•  Transition from OSHAS18001 to ISO45001 
an international Health and Safety Standard

Health and Wellbeing
•  Develop Group wellbeing framework
•  Support local health and 

wellbeing initiatives

Environmental Safeguarding
•  Continuous improvement in safeguarding 

our local environments

•  Maintain local accreditation to ISO14001

The Group’s underlying Total Incident Rate 
(TIR) fell by 40% to 0.27 in 2019. This included 
reductions in numbers of both types of 
recordable injuries (Lost Times and Medical 
Treatments). A key component of this was 
an exceptional performance by the Oil & Gas 
Division which had zero Lost Time Injuries and 
almost halved their TIR. Thankfully, this was 
another year without fatality in our operations. 

87% of our key businesses are accredited to 
both OSHAS 18001/ISO45001 and ISO14001. 

Engagement is a key part of our SHE strategy 
and we continued to develop an environment 
where people at all levels talk about safety 
and speak up if they are not comfortable with 
the way something is being done. 

Health and Wellbeing
This year we more than doubled the number 
of safety conversations recorded. The topics 
of conversations went beyond safety with 
a particular increase in conversations about 
people’s health and wellbeing. 

“Are you OK?” That’s the question at the 
heart of an annual national day of action in 
Australia dedicated to suicide prevention. 
Born from a personal tragedy, R U OK? Day 
is based on the idea that a conversation can 
change a life. On 12 September, Weir ESCO 
held R U OK? Day events across Australia, 
including in Brisbane, Rutherford, Perth and 
a joint event with Weir Minerals. Training was 
conducted on how to recognise the signs that 
someone may be struggling, and employees 
received conversation cards outlining the 
steps for starting an R U OK? conversation 
– ask, listen, encourage action and check 
in. Participants also learned how to respond 
appropriately and safely to anyone who says, 
“No, I’m not OK.” 

1  Continuing operations only.

63

WELLBEINGHEALTH &FIRSTSAFETYENVIRONMENTALSAFEGUARDINGZERO HARMCHAMPIONING 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

SUSTAINABILITY REVIEW
CONTINUED

CREATING SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS 

OUR GOALS 

PRODUCTS IN USE 
•  Enable net zero through 

innovative solutions

 DESIGN AND SUPPLY CHAIN
•  Embed sustainable product 
design and procurement

CIRCULARITY
•  Drive and capture opportunities 

to shift from linear to a 
circular model

IN SUPPORT OF UN SDGs

Circularity
Products embody carbon due to the 
energy involved in their design, production, 
distribution, use, maintenance and disposal 
across their life cycle. Therefore, if we can 
extend the wear lifetimes of our products or 
find alternative uses then we can reduce their 
environmental impacts. The Vulco® R67 mill 
lining rubber compound increases product 
efficiency and delivers a 20% increase in wear 
life over comparable composite lifter bars. 

Our service centre network supports the 
refurbishment of our products to continue to 
increase the lifespan of our products. 

Our Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) 
Synertrex® platform offers predictive 
maintenance feedback which can further 
enhance the life of our products and reduce 
environmental impacts. We are also improving 
our recycling processes by purchasing our 
scrap from customers and integrating those 
materials back into our production process. 

NEXT STEPS
Products in use
•  Improve energy efficiency of products
•  Improve water efficiency of products
•  Increase safety of products

Design and Supply Chain
•  Review and integrate sustainability into the 

new product design process

•  Deliver sustainable product design training
•  Work with supply chain partners to ensure 

sustainability across the supply chain

Circularity
•  Continue to extend wear life
•  Optimise circularity performance
•  Review end of life product 
treatment opportunities

ENABLING
NET ZERO

KEY ACTIONS IN 2019
Products in use
Our smart, efficient and sustainable technology 
strategy ensures that our innovations are 
always relevant to our customers. 

In 2019 we focused on helping our customers 
meet both their operational cost reduction goals 
and their goals on reducing climate-related 
impacts during product usage. For instance, 
our technology helps customers to reduce 
use phase energy consumption, waste and 
associated GHG emissions. An example 
of this is our High-Pressure Grinding Rolls, 
which not only require up to 30% less energy 
than traditional methods, but their wearable 
components last much longer than those in 
ball and rod mills. 

A second example is our Terraflowing® technology 
for tailings management. From dewatering to 
transport, disposal, and the conversion of tailings 
into a resource, we can provide customers with 
an end-to-end tailings and pipeline solution. 
This holistic, solutions-based approach to tailings 
management strengthens our relationship with 
customers and adds value to their operation 
beyond pumping. Considering demand for water 
conservation, operational sustainability and safe 
deposition of tailings, we have invested in this 

area to help solve crucial issues within the 
mining sector. 

Our Oil & Gas Division in 2019 launched the 
SPM® QEM 5000 E-Frac Pump representing 
two firsts: a frac pump designed from the 
ground up for electric or gas turbine and 
5,000-horsepower capacity in a single unit, 
rated for service at 100% of rod load, 24 
hours a day, even in extreme conditions. 
With only eight SPM® QEM 5000 e-frac 
pumps needed to match the output of 20 
conventional pumps, maintenance, noise 
pollution, safety hazards, emissions and 
overall footprint are reduced.

Design and Supply chain 
Our ESCO Division launched the GET Detect 
smart product solution. It solves one of our 
customer’s biggest challenges – the loss 
of Ground Engaging Tools. This is important 
because if a part makes its way to the 
crushing circuit it can become stuck, stopping 
production, causing expensive downtime 
and putting people in harm’s way as they try 
to retrieve it. The team developed exclusive 
algorithms that identify if a part has become 
detached and then alerts the machine 
operator for early intervention to prevent 
further damage.

64

SOLUTIONSCREATING SUSTAINABLECIRCULARITYPRODUCTS IN USEDESIGN ANDSUPPLY CHAINThe Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

REDUCING OUR FOOTPRINT

OUR GOALS

CO2e 
•  50% reduction in Scope 1 & 2 

CO2e by 2030

 WASTE 
•  Deliver against division specific 

zero waste targets

WATER
•  Develop water stewardship 
programmes in all water 
stressed locations 

IN SUPPORT OF UN SDGs

50%
REDUCTION
IN CO2e 
BY 2030

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

•  Fuel switching for both heat and power in 

buildings, process and transportation

•  Renewable generation and energy 

purchasing reviews

Waste
Over 52,000 tonnes of scrap metal was 
reused within our foundry operations during 
2019, comprising 42% of all metal poured in 
the foundries. 

We conducted our No Time to 
Waste Innovation Challenge (NTTW). 
Hundreds of ideas were generated from 
the NTTW challenge and shared across 
the Group. The winning idea resulted in 
investigation into the feasibility of converting 
Mature Fine Tailings (MFT), a necessary 
but unwanted by-product of the oil sands 
extraction process, into an environmentally 
friendly material. This is a pervasive issue 
in the oil sands with over a trillion litres of 
unprocessed MFT held in large tailings ponds.

In 2019 we worked in collaboration with 
Natural Energy Systems (NES) to successfully 
complete a Phase 1 study. 

Water
Our Oil & Gas Division have reduced water 
consumption at their sites in the Middle East, 
one of the most highly water stressed regions 
in which Weir operates. 

By implementing a three step process of 
removing oil contamination, solids and sludge 
from steam remnants we allow this water to 
be reused within the sites. Our sites within 
Africa have continued to implement water 
saving projects including water continuity, 
harvesting and recycling. 

NEXT STEPS
CO2e and Energy
•  Expand advanced metering and 

data collection

•  Deliver further energy efficiency projects
•  Launch behavioural change campaigns 
•  Develop renewables supply strategy

Waste 
•  Develop the phase 2 MFT study
•  Conduct waste data detailed analysis
•  Focus on highest impact waste reduction 

and redirection projects

Water 
•  Pilot water stewardship programme

KEY ACTIONS IN 2019
CO2e and Energy
As an energy and carbon intensive business 
operating 11 foundries worldwide in 2019, 
we recognise the importance of measuring 
and minimising our Greenhouse Gas (GHG) 
emissions. 

The Group’s total annual GHG emissions, 
measured in tCO2e for the year ending 
31 December 2019 were 226,292. This total 
showed an absolute reduction of 8.3% in 
comparison to 20181. The total includes 
continuing and discontinued operations. 
Our total GHG emissions from continuing 
operations were 220,810 tCO2e, a reduction 
of 6.9% from 20181. During 2019, our total 
GHG emissions for our 11 foundries1 were 
136,289 tCO2e which represented an absolute 
reduction. Our full GHG emissions breakdown 
can be found on page 70.

We conducted advanced metering 
energy efficiency pilots at sites that 
make up 17% of the Group’s total CO2e 
footprint. These locations identified energy 
reductions of between 11% and 25% per 
site that collectively add up to ~£1m per 
annum savings. 

We completed the UK government required 
Energy Saving Obligation Scheme audits and 
identified potential energy costs savings of 
10% which required little to no investment.

Across the sites we have seen emissions 
reduction projects including:

•  Lighting upgrades
•  Heat recovery assessments
•  Behavioural change campaigns 

1  The 2018 figures have been recalculated to include the 

ESCO Division for the whole of the 2018 year in order to 
provide a like for like comparison across the years.

65

WASTECO2eWATERFOOTPRINTREDUCING OUR 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

SUSTAINABILITY REVIEW
CONTINUED

OUR SUSTAINABLE FOUNDATIONS

OUR SUSTAINABLE FOUNDATIONS
In addition to our four sustainability roadmap 
strategic priorities we aspire to have the best 
in class corporate governance across all areas 
of sustainability.

Climate Change
We are committed to taking action to tackle 
climate change. We have created goals to 
support this commitment as a key component 
of our Roadmap, within the Creating 
Sustainable Solutions and Reducing Our 
Footprint priorities. In addition to mitigating 
climate change we are taking action to better 
understand and prepare for the climate 
related risks and opportunities that will 
and are affecting our businesses. 

We welcome and support efforts, such as 
the Task Force on Climate-related Financial 
Disclosures (TCFD), to increase transparency 
and to promote investors’ understanding 
of companies’ strategies to respond to 
the risks and opportunities presented by 
climate change.

We believe that companies should be 
transparent about how they plan to mitigate 
and be resilient in the face of climate change.

In 2019, we established Environmental 
Sustainability as a principal risk across the 
Group. This risk focuses on the potential 
physical and transitional risks from climate 
change and environmental events which may 
impact our business, our customers or our 
supply chain. In 2020 we will conduct our 
first TCFD assessment and align with the 
reporting requirements. 

2019 CDP Climate Change Score

 B

DISCLOSURE  INSIGHT ACTION

We submit annually to CDP – Climate Change 
to share our risk management approach to 
climate change and our greenhouse gas 
(GHG) emissions performance. In 2019, 
we achieved a score of B. 

As a business with operations around the 
world we can be exposed to a wide range of 
extreme weather events. In 2019, this has 
included heavy rain, flooding and tornadoes 
across South and Midwest USA, Cyclone Fani 
in India, Cyclone Ann in Australia, extreme 

flooding in China, severe heat-waves in India 
and Europe, and heat-waves, bush-fires and 
dust storms in Australia. 

We were fortunate that none of our 
employees have been harmed and very little 
disruption has occurred at our sites due to 
these incidents. In the case of such an event 
occurring, we have put in place measures to 
ensure operational resilience for ourselves 
and our customers. We do recognise that 
climate change will impact upon our business.

We will continue to develop our approach to 
climate change relating to business strategy, 
risk disclosure, opportunity disclosure and 
emissions reduction initiatives aligning with 
the TCFD recommendations. 

Code of Conduct 
We are dedicated to doing business in an 
ethical and in a transparent manner, this 
commitment has driven our legacy for 
more almost 150 years. The Group’s Code 
of Conduct (Code) is based on this simple, 
fundamental value. The Code sets out the 
Group’s commitment to promoting and 
sustaining a strong ethical culture throughout 
its operations, and provides direction on and 
a framework for how we expect our people 
to conduct themselves on a day-to-day basis. 
All employees are expected to make decisions 
in line with our values and behaviours as set 
out in the Code of Conduct. 

In May 2019, we published an updated 
version of the Code that incorporates the 
‘We are Weir’ framework. The updated Code 
sets out our standard and expectations 
for conducting business with integrity and 
transparency; treating each other with 
respect; promoting safe working conditions; 
safeguarding the environment; and protecting 
our data and assets.

Following the launch of the updated Code, 
we provided online and in-person training 
modules on the new Code, and over 9,000 
employees have completed the training. 

To accompany the updated Code, in 2019 
we also updated the Group’s Anti-bribery 
and Corruption Policy (ABC Policy) which 
sets out in more detail than the Code the 
Group’s position that it does not allow bribery 
or corruption in any form, whether by Group 
personnel or third parties acting on the 
Group’s behalf.

66

Both the Code and the ABC Policy are 
available to the public on the Weir Group 
internet site, and to all employees on the Weir 
intranet. Both the Code and the ABC Policy 
have been translated into ten languages.

Tax transparency
Our approach to tax is governed by five key 
principles which are set and adopted by the 
Board and are stated as follows: 

•  We are committed to compliance with 
all applicable tax laws and regulations, 
including timely submission of tax returns 
and tax payments. 

•  We aim to develop and maintain effective, 
collaborative and co-operative working 
relationships with tax authorities in all 
territories where we operate based on both 
openness, honesty and transparency, and 
by providing all relevant information in a 
timely manner with a view to resolving any 
disputes early. 

•  Our businesses make use of legitimate 

tax incentives, exemptions and statutory 
alternatives offered by governments.
Tax planning is undertaken only where it 
is consistent with the substance of our 
business and with full regard to the aims 
of our stakeholders, our reputation and our 
broader commercial and economic goals. 

•  We adhere to the standards for the 
disclosure of tax information in our 
published financial statements, in 
accordance with industry and generally 
accepted practice; and 

•  We ensure compliance with our tax 

obligations by maintaining appropriate tax 
management arrangements including the 
roles and responsibilities taken on by our 
people. These five principles are reflected 
and more information about our approach 
to tax are set out in our tax strategy which 
can be found on our website.

www.global.weir/investors/ corporate-governance/matters-
reserved-to-the board/

Human Rights
We respect the human rights of all those 
working for or with us, and of the people in 
the communities where we operate. We will 
not exploit anyone, wherever in the world we 
are working. We will not do business with 
companies, organisations or individuals that 
we believe are not working to comparable 
human rights standards. Our Human Rights 
Policy communicates to our customers, 

suppliers, investors, employees and the 
communities where we operate the ethical 
and social values we respect and our 
commitment to uphold human rights. 

Ethics Hotline
The Group maintains processes for persons 
to raise concerns regarding unethical 
behaviour. This includes the ability to 
conduct whistleblowing through our Ethics 
Hotline. The Ethics Hotline is a 24-hour, 
multilingual service accessible via telephone 
or online which allows concerns to be raised 
confidentially and anonymously.

The Compliance function has responsibility 
for acknowledging and investigating as 
appropriate all matters raised through the 
Ethics Hotline. The Group takes appropriate 
action in respect of any matters raised via the 
Hotline which are substantiated. 

Weir does not tolerate retaliation against anyone 
who raises concerns about ethical behaviour, 
whether via the Ethics Hotline or otherwise. 

Suppliers and third parties
We source raw materials, components and 
services across the globe. Our suppliers 
play a critical role in our business and our 
relationships with them are based on 
achieving the best performance, product 
delivery, service and total cost in an ethical 
and sustainable manner. 

We recognise that our responsibilities extend to 
our supply chain. We have a Supply Chain Policy 
which sets out the minimum standards we 
expect our suppliers to abide by with respect to: 

•  business ethics; 
•  how they treat their workforce; 
•  legal and regulatory compliance; 
•  health and safety; and 
•  environmental standards

Modern Slavery
We understand our role in trying to eradicate 
slavery or forced labour of any kind. Each year, 
we publish on our website our Modern 
Slavery Statement which details the steps 
we have taken and are taking to try to ensure 
that slavery and human trafficking do not take 
place in any of our supply chains or in any part 
of our business.

www.global.weir/site-information/modern-slavery-statement.pdf

FTSE4Good

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

We have been a member of the 
FTSE4Good index series for nine years. 
FTSE4Good is designed to measure the 
performance of companies demonstrating 
strong Environmental, Social and Governance 
(ESG) practices. We are proud to have been 
able to meet the rigorous requirements to 
be included within this series and to have 
improved upon our previous years’ score. 
This year we have put in place mechanisms 
to be able to obtain and publish greater 
levels of data related to our ESG actions 
and are committed to further improving 
our performance in 2020 and beyond.

Information Systems and Technology
Having robust, secure and efficient 
Information Systems & Technology (IS&T) 
capabilities are vital to effective operations 
across the Group. 

In 2019, as part of our continual improvement 
programme, we looked in detail at how 
our IS&T services and support were being 
delivered. This resulted in the development of 
the IS&T Transformation Programme which will:

•  deliver an Operating Model which ensures 
divisional teams can focus on delivering 
Business Systems Transformation while 
Group teams focus on Strategy, Policy 
& Governance;

•  mitigate operational and security risks; and
•  implement a robust IT infrastructure 

delivering secure, reliable and cost-effective 
IS&T services across Weir.

Initial changes include reforms to IS&T 
security practices including improved 
monitoring, risk management and 
response capabilities which have already 
significantly increased our security rigour 
and preparedness. These will be followed 
by the introduction of a network operations 
centre and 24x7 security monitoring across 
the business, providing improved response 
capabilities and visibility. Over the next two 
years the IS&T Transformation Programme 
will deliver improved network performance, 
the implementation of more standardised 
user experiences, consolidation of data 
centres and the introduction of more 
collaborative tools to leverage information 
and knowledge sharing across the Group.

Safety Governance
The CEO’s Safety Committee was established 
in 2016 to give Board-level leadership to the 
Group’s ambition of becoming a Zero-Harm 
workplace. The Committee consists of senior 
leaders from across the Group, including 
the three divisional presidents and the Chief 
People Officer and embodies the priorities of 
our Safety, Health and Environment Charter. 
The Committee oversees Safety, Health and 

67

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

Environment (SHE) performance, ensuring the 
Group systems and processes are best set up 
to deliver our Zero Harm vision.

The Safety, Health and Environment (SHE) 
Excellence Committee supports the CEO’s 
Safety Committee and provides leadership, co-
ordination and support for the delivery of the 
Group SHE objectives. It is tasked by the Board 
to drive continuous SHE improvement across 
the Group through setting and assessing 
rigorous standards that are comprehensive, 
risk-based, deliverable and built on the 
best practice of our peers, customers and 
professional bodies. This applies equally 
to existing operations and new projects. 
The progress towards an increasingly 
behavioural safety culture has been the 
priority of the SHE Excellence Committee and 
is evident in the focus on the engagement 
elements of our Zero Harm strategy.

Building Organisational Capability
Our aspiration is to build a sustainable 
workforce which enables employees and 
leaders to continuously grow. This is our 
vision at the heart of our learning and 
development strategy which was developed 
during 2019. We identified four priorities to 
deliver this vision over the next three years:

•  Build organisational capability: 

To develop the five core capabilities 
identified as being critical to the successful 
delivery of ‘We are Weir’: leadership, 
technical, digital, solutions-selling and 
operational excellence. In 2019, over 1,500 
employees graduated from the Minerals 
Technical Learning Programme which 
aims to build customer-facing employees’ 
knowledge of our products and solutions.
•  Help employees grow their own way: 
To provide all employees with tools and 
resources to learn, develop and grow their 
careers at Weir, enabling them to do the 
best work of their lives.

•  Doing the right thing today and 

everyday: Ensuring that Weir employees 
are trained appropriately in SHE, legal 
and regulatory obligations to ensure they 
always do the right thing.

•  Brilliant basics (learning governance, 

policies and systems): Learning 
governance, policies and systems 
will be the key enablers to delivering 
our strategy. 2020 will see us deliver 
a new learning platform through our 
Workday implementation.

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

SUSTAINABILITY REVIEW
CONTINUED

[Image caption]

68

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

SUPPORTING 
OUR COMMUNITIES

Weir Oil & Gas’ North American Pressure 
Control facility in Houston donated 27,000 
bottles of water to support replenishing 
Salvation Army reserves recently used 
during Tropical Storm Imelda. Major Zach 
Bell, Area Commander for The Salvation 
Army of Greater Houston. “As recovery 
efforts continue across the region, their 
donation will help The Salvation Army 
provide a much-needed resource to 
families and individuals working to put 
their homes and lives back together”. 

In response to the severe weather that 
inundated the midsection of the US in 
spring 2019, Weir ESCO made a $5,000 
donation to the American Red Cross to 
help the agency provide comfort and 
support to disaster victims as more 
storms and flooding threatened the 
region. The Red Cross is a long-time 
partner of Weir ESCO and we are proud 
to support their humanitarian efforts.

 Weir Minerals India donated temporary 
roofs valued at £1,000 to families that 
were impacted by cyclone Fani in the 
state of Odisha. 

AS RECOVERY 
EFFORTS CONTINUE 
ACROSS THE REGION, 
THEIR DONATION 
WILL HELP THE 
SALVATION ARMY 
PROVIDE A MUCH-
NEEDED RESOURCE 
TO FAMILIES AND 
INDIVIDUALS 
WORKING TO PUT 
THEIR HOMES 
AND LIVES BACK 
TOGETHER. 

MAJOR ZACH BELL
Area Commander for The Salvation 
Army of Greater Houston

69

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Strategic Report

NON-FINANCIAL REPORTING

In the table below we outline our GHG emissions in line with the reporting requirement of the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Reports and 
Directors’ Reports) Regulations 2013. We have separated our continuing operations in order to provide a like-for-like emissions profile comparison 
moving forward. 

TOTAL ANNUAL GHG EMISSIONS

Scope 1 emissions: fuel combustion and operation of facilities
Scope 2 emissions: purchased electricity and heat 
Total (continuing and discontinued operations) 
Total (continuing operations) 
Total (discontinued operations)

ANNUAL GHG EMISSIONS FROM FOUNDRIES

Global Annual GHG  
emissions tCO2e

GHG emissions intensity  
(tCO2e per £m revenue)

2019
81,631
144,661
226,292
220,810
5,482

2018
89,002
157,693
246,696
237,127
9,569

2019
29.0
51.4
80.5
83.0
36.5

2018
29.0
51.4
80.5
87.1
27.9

Scope 1 emissions: fuel combustion and operation 
of facilities
Scope 2 emissions: purchased
electricity and heat
Total

Annual GHG emissions (tCO2e)

2019

2018

46,725

52,469

89,564
136,289

95,915
148,383

Proportion of Global 
(continuing operations) 
annual emissions (%)

GHG emissions intensity
(tCO2e per tonne of metal 
poured)

2019

21.2

40.6
61.7

2018

22.1

40.4
62.6

2019

2018

0.4

0.7
1.1

0.4

0.8
1.3

Notes: Scope 1 emissions: fuel combustion and operation of facilities. Scope 2 emissions: purchased electricity and heat.

We report on all emission sources required under the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors’ Reports) Regulations 2013. These sources fall within our consolidated financial 
statement. We do not have responsibility for emission sources that are not included in our consolidated statement.

Annual emissions figures for 2018 have been restated as they were materially different due to the acquisition of ESCO, to reflect the collation of more accurate consumption data and the 
correction of emissions factors which had resulted in an understatement. The need to restate was identified during our standard review process.

We have included within the 2018 data the full year 2018 ESCO GHG emissions, revenue and tonnes of metal poured, our ESCO Division was only acquired in July 2018, to allow for like-for-like 
comparison between the two years. We have provided data which separates our continuing and discontinued operations. Our continuing operations consists of our three remaining divisions 
(Minerals, Oil & Gas and ESCO) and Group entities emissions. Our discontinued operations comprises our Flow Control Division which was sold in June 2019. For the total (continuing and 
discontinued), total (continuing) and total (discontinued) emissions, the emissions for our Flow Control Division are only included up to the point of sale in June 2019.

Our Foundry GHG emissions do not contain any discontinued operations so no differentiation is required. Totals may not sum due to rounding. 

We have referred to the ‘GHG Protocol: Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard’ (revised edition) and used emission factors from the UK Government’s ‘GHG Conversion Factors for 
Company Reporting 2019’ and other region-specific emissions factors where available.

70

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

The Non-Financial Reporting table below meets the requirement of the Companies, Partnerships and Groups (Accounts and Non-Financial 
Reporting) Regulations 2016. The required information about the business model can be found on pages 14-15.

Non-Financial 
Reporting 
Requirement

Environmental 
matters

Employees

Policies and standards which govern 
our approach and due diligence

Relevant Group  
Principal Risk

KPIs3

Safety, Health and 
Environment (SHE)2
Environmental 
Sustainability2

Staff recruitment, 
development and 
retention2
Safety, Health and 
Environment (SHE)2

Code of Conduct1 
SHE Charter1
SHE Management System1 
Sustainability Roadmap1
SHE Excellence Committee
Risk Committee

Code of Conduct1
SHE Charter1
SHE Management System1
Sustainability Roadmap1
Diversity and Inclusion Policy1
Board Diversity Policy1
Inclusion and Diversity Committee
SHE Excellence Committee
Risk Committee

Rating within the 
SHE performance 
measurement process
GHG Emissions
CDP score

Rating within the  
SHE performance 
measurement process.
Total Incident Rate
Organisational effectiveness  
measure 
Gender pay gap results
Employee engagement 
survey participation rates
Employee engagement 
eNPS

Outcomes and additional 
information

Sustainability Review 
Pages – 60,61,63, 
64,65,66 and 67

Sustainability Review  
Pages – 60,61,62,63, 
66,67 and 117

Human rights

Social matters

Anti-corruption  
and anti-bribery

Code of Conduct1
Human Rights Policy1
Modern Slavery Statement1 
Sustainability Roadmap1
Risk Committee

Code of Conduct1
Gifts & Hospitality Policy1
Anti-Corruption and  
Bribery Policy1
Sustainability Roadmap1
Risk Committee

Code of Conduct1
Anti-Corruption and  
Bribery Policy1
Gifts & Hospitality Policy1
Sustainability Roadmap1
Risk Committee

Ethics, governance 
& control2

FTSE4Good score
Code of Conduct Training 
completion

Sustainability Review 
Pages – 60,61,66 
and 67

Ethics, governance 
& control2

Charitable Giving 
FTSE4Good score

Sustainability Review 
Pages – 60,61,62,66 
and 67

Ethics, governance  
& control2

FTSE4Good score 
Code of Conduct Training 
completion

Sustainability Review 
Pages – 60,61,66 
and 67

1  These policies are available on our website https://www.global.weir/sustainability/policies/.

2  More information about our principal risks can be found on pages 50-59.

3  More information about medium-term Key Performance Indicators and priorities which are aligned to our ‘We are Weir’ strategic framework and the Group’s remuneration policy can  

be found on page 106.

The Strategic Report covering pages 1-71 of the Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019, has been approved by the Board of Directors in 
accordance with The Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors’ Report) Regulations 2013.

On behalf of the Board of Directors

GRAHAM VANHEGAN
Chief Legal Officer and Company Secretary

26 February 2020

71

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

OVERVIEW OF GOVERNANCE

CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTION 
TO GOVERNANCE
READ MORE 
PAGE 73

BOARD ACTIVITIES
READ MORE 
PAGE 82

BOARD PERSPECTIVES
READ MORE  
PAGES 79 
AND 88

Leadership and purpose

Overview of the Board of Directors and Group 
Executive biographies.

Chairman’s Introduction to Governance 
Board biographies 
Group Executive biographies 

Division of responsibilities

Explains the roles of the Board and its Directors, including:

Governance Framework 
Division of Responsibilities 
Senior Independent Director Overview 
Board Statements 

Effectiveness, evaluation and succession

Sets out Board activities during the year, key processes of the 
Board and its Committees.

Board Meetings 
Board Activity Timeline 
‘Meet the Board’ Case Study 
Board Effectiveness Evaluation 
First Year as a Non-Executive Director Ebbie Haan 
Board Inductions 

Audit, risks and internal controls

Explains the role of the Board and the Audit Committee.

Accountability 
Viability statement 
Nomination Committee Report 
Audit Committee Report 

Relations with Shareholders

Provides an overview of the activities undertaken to maintain an 
open dialogue with the Company’s Shareholder’s.

Engaging with Our Shareholders 

Remuneration

Describes the Company’s remuneration arrangements in respect 
of its Directors, and how these have been implemented:

73
74
76

77
78
79
87

80
82
85
86
88
81

89
90
91
94

84

Directors’ Remuneration Report 
Remuneration at a Glance 
Summary of policy and 2020 implementation 
Directors’ Remuneration Policy 
Directors’ Report 
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 

102
104
106
108
126
129

72

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTION TO GOVERNANCE

THE BOARD IS 
COMMITTED TO THE 
HIGHEST STANDARDS 
OF INTEGRITY AND 
ACCOUNTABILITY. OUR 
ROBUST CORPORATE 
GOVERNANCE 
FRAMEWORK ENSURES 
PRUDENT OVERSIGHT TO 
PROTECT STAKEHOLDER 
VALUE. 

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

CHARLES BERRY
Chairman

OUR PURPOSE
We are here to enable 
the sustainable and efficient 
delivery of the natural resources 
essential to create a better future 
for the world.

The Company has complied in full 
during 2019 and to the date of this 
report with the provisions of the 
UK Corporate Governance Code 
published in 2018.

The Code is publicly available at the 
website of the Financial Reporting 
Council at www.frc.org.uk.

CHARLES BERRY
Chairman

DEAR SHAREHOLDERS,
I am pleased to present the Corporate 
Governance Report for 2019. Under my 
Chairmanship, I continue to ensure that the 
Board leads by example to demonstrate 
the values of the Company and to promote 
a culture of transparency, sustainability 
and accountability. The Board is committed 
to the highest standards of integrity and 
oversees a robust and effective system of 
Corporate Governance controls to protect 
stakeholder value. 

This report describes our Corporate 
Governance framework and explains how the 
Board works with its Committees to ensure 
that the framework remains appropriate and 
effective. This prudent oversight is essential 
to deliver the strategy and to create long-term 
value for our stakeholders. 

The Board continues to ensure ongoing 
engagement with stakeholders throughout 
the year and acknowledges the clear 
responsibility it has to promote the long-term 
success of the Company for its stakeholders. 
This long-term approach defines how the 
strategy is set and allows the Board to 
assess risk and deliver sustainable value 
for stakeholders. We have also continued 
to focus on assessing and monitoring our 
Company culture in order to ensure that 
the voice of our employees is heard in 
the Boardroom. 

The Board operates effectively and each 
Director continues to contribute the correct 
balance of skills, experience, independence, 
knowledge and the ability to commit sufficient 
time to undertake their responsibilities. 

The Board also ensures an open and 
transparent remuneration policy for the 

effective recruitment and retention of 
Board members and employees. A formal 
procedure exists to ensure the alignment 
on remuneration with the culture and the 
strategic plan. 

UK CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
CODE 2018
The UK Corporate Governance Code is 
published by the Financial Reporting Council 
and sets out the standards of good practice in 
relation to matters such as Board composition 
and effectiveness, the role of Board 
Committees, risk management, remuneration 
and relations with Shareholders. 

The Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure 
and Transparency Rule 7.2.6 (DTR 7.2.6) 
requires the corporate governance statement 
to contain certain information required by 
Schedule 7 to the Large and Medium sized 
Companies and Groups (Accounts and 
Reports) Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/410). 
This information relates to significant interests 
in the securities of the Company, securities 
carrying special rights with regard to the 
control of the Company, restrictions on voting 
rights, rules regarding the appointment and 
replacement of Directors, rules regarding 
changes to the Company’s Articles of 
Association and the Directors’ powers in 
relation to the issuing or buying back by 
the Company of its shares. The relevant 
information can be found within the Directors’ 
Report on pages 126-128.

The following Corporate Governance Report, 
including the Committee Reports and the 
Directors’ Report, set out how we apply 
our governance standards in practice and 
demonstrates our compliance with the UK 
Corporate Governance Code 2018.

73

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board considers that each Director standing for re-election at the AGM in 2020 continues to promote the long-term sustainable success of the Company by contributing a specialist skill 
set that is valuable to the Company, its stakeholders and is complementary to the Board as a whole. 

You can read more about the Directors individual skill sets in the Nomination Committee Report on page 93. 

CHARLES BERRY
Chairman  N* 

JON STANTON
Chief Executive Officer 

JOHN HEASLEY
Chief Financial Officer 

BARBARA JEREMIAH
Senior Independent 
Director  A   N   R  

CLARE CHAPMAN
Non-Executive Director 
R*  

CAL COLLINS
Non-Executive Director

Date of appointment: 
1 August 2017

Date of appointment: 
1 August 2017

Date of appointment: 
12 July 2018

Senior Independent Director 
since 1 January 2020

Independent:
Yes

Independent:
No

Date of appointment:
Chairman since 
January 2014 and Non-
Executive Director since 
1 March 2013

Independent:
Yes

Key strengths 
and experience
Charles brings extensive 
governance and leadership 
experience to the 
Board gained in senior 
management positions 
held within a variety of 
sectors. Prior to joining Weir, 
Charles was an Executive 
Director of Scottish Power 
plc and Chief Executive of 
its UK operations. He is 
a former Non-Executive 
Director and Chairman of 
Eaga plc, Drax Group plc, 
Senior plc and Thus Group 
plc, and a former Non-
Executive Director of Impax 
Environmental Markets 
PLC and Securities Trust of 
Scotland plc.

His vast leadership and 
management experience is 
critical to lead the Board and 
ensure it remains effective, 
to monitor and uphold the 
values and purpose of the 
Company and to ensure 
that a robust and effective 
framework of Corporate 
Governance exists to 
protect stakeholder value. 

Key external appointments
•  Chairman and 

Nomination Committee 
Chair of Centrica plc

•  Member of the steering 
group of the Hampton-
Alexander Review

Date of appointment:
Chief Executive Officer 
since October 2016. 
Finance Director from April 
2010 – October 2016

Date of appointment:
Chief Financial Officer 
since October 2016 

Independent:
No

Independent:
No

Key strengths 
and experience 
John is a seasoned 
professional with significant 
financial and operational 
experience gained in 
financial practice, energy 
and mining sectors. 

He contributes financial 
expertise and significant 
management, commercial 
and operational skills to 
execute the strategy across 
each of the divisions, while 
ensuring a robust and 
effective financial control 
environment which is 
compliant with regulations. 

John is also our Group 
Executive Sponsor for 
Inclusion & Diversity, 
chairing the Group Inclusion 
and Diversity Committee. 
John is a Chartered 
Accountant and a member 
of the Institute of Chartered 
Accountants of Scotland. 

Key external appointments
•  Non-Executive Director 

of Royal Scottish 
National Orchestra 
Society Limited

Key strengths 
and experience 
Jon became CEO in 2016 
and contributes a wealth 
of experience to the Board. 
Since becoming CEO, he 
has led the Weir portfolio 
transformation and oversees 
the delivery of the ‘We are 
Weir’ strategic framework to 
create long-term sustainable 
performance improvement. 

He provides leadership 
to deliver the strategy 
and ensure it aligns 
with our purpose and 
values. Jon is committed 
to regular engagement 
with stakeholders and to 
ensuring stakeholder views 
and concerns are heard, 
understood and considered.

Jon joined the Board as 
Finance Director in 2010. 
Prior to this he was a 
partner with Ernst & Young, 
where he led global board-
level relationships with a 
number of FTSE-100 multi-
national companies.

He is a Chartered 
Accountant and a member 
of the Institute of Chartered 
Accountants in England 
and Wales.

Key external appointments
•  Non-Executive Director 
of Imperial Brands PLC

Independent:
Yes

Key strengths 
and experience 
Barbara contributes 
considerable experience 
to the Board having spent 
over 30 years in a number 
of senior leadership roles 
within Alcoa Inc., the global 
aluminium producer and as 
the Chairwoman of Boart 
Longyear Limited.

Barbara’s leadership and 
governance experience 
allows her to effectively 
contribute to the Board as 
Senior Independent Director 
by providing support to 
the Chairman in his duties 
where necessary and 
engaging with a range 
of major Shareholders in 
order to help develop a 
balanced understanding of 
their views. 

Barbara has a BA in 
political science and is a 
qualified lawyer.

Key external appointments
•  Non-Executive Director 

and Remuneration 
Committee Chair of 
Aggreko plc

•  Non-Executive Director 
of Russel Metals Inc

•  Non-Executive Director 
and RemCo Chair of 
Premier Oil plc

Key strengths 
and experience 
Cal was previously Chairman 
and Chief Executive Officer 
of ESCO Corporation which 
Weir acquired in 2018. 
He contributes a wealth 
of international resource 
markets experience which 
allows him to support the 
delivery of the strategy and 
to work with the Board to 
ensure that the Company 
fulfils its purpose to enable 
the sustainable and efficient 
delivery of the natural 
resources essential in 
creating a better future for 
the world.

Key external appointments
•  Non-Executive 

Director of Stimson 
Lumber Company

•  Non-Executive 

Director of ENTEK 
International LLC

Key strengths 
and experience 
Clare brings a wide range 
of people, governance 
and large scale business 
transformation skills to the 
Board which allow her to 
contribute effectively in 
her role as Remuneration 
Committee Chair. She has 
vast experience of Human 
Resource Management 
gained during her time 
as Group People Director 
of BT Group plc and 
Tesco Plc and as Director 
General of Workforce for 
the NHS and Social Care. 
Clare was also previously a 
Non-Executive Director of 
Kingfisher plc and TUI Travel 
plc and Chairman of their 
Remuneration Committees. 
Clare was Group HR 
Director of Tesco plc from 
1999 to 2006 and HR Vice 
President of Pepsi Cola’s 
European operations from 
1994 to 1999. Clare also 
has experience of working 
outside the UK with over 
ten years as an executive 
based in the USA and 
mainland Europe. 

Clare’s considerable 
experience and expertise 
allows her to contribute 
and challenge as well as to 
engage with stakeholders 
to ensure that there is an 
appropriate and transparent 
Remuneration Policy which 
is aligned with the Weir 
culture and strategy. 

Key external appointments
•  Non-Executive Director 
of Heidrick & Struggles 
International, Inc.

•  Non-Executive 

Director and Chair of 
the Remuneration 
Committee of G4S plc

•  Commissioner on the 
Low Pay Commission

BOARD DIVERSITY BY TENURE 

BOARD DIVERSITY BY GENDER 

 Male 

 Female 

8

3

•  Steering Group Member 

and Co-Chair of 
Purposeful Company

 0-3 years 

 Male 

 Female 

 3-5 years 

 Male 

 Female 

 5-10 years 

 Male 

 Female 

5

3

2

2

2

0

4

3

1

74

 
 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EBBIE HAAN
Non-Executive Director 
A   R  

Date of appointment:
18 February 2019

Independent:
Yes

Key strengths 
and experience 
Ebbie contributes 
considerable Oil & Gas 
and engineering expertise 
to the Board. He spent 26 
years working on global 
projects for Royal Dutch 
Shell including holding 
senior leadership positions 
in the Middle East, Africa, 
Europe, Asia and the 
US, where he gained 
extensive international 
management experience. 
He was previously 
Managing Director of Sasol 
Petroleum International 
before being appointed 
as Chief Growth Officer 
for Maersk Oil, in 2015. 
Since 2018 Ebbie has run 
his own advisory firm. 

Ebbie’s valuable knowledge 
of the Group’s core 
markets assists the Board 
to ensure that the Group 
operates in an efficient 
way to maximise long-term 
growth for its stakeholders. 
His experience of SHE best 
practice and commitment 
to safety is also extremely 
valuable to the Company.

Ebbie has both an 
undergraduate degree 
and a Masters in Geology 
from Utrecht University in 
the Netherlands.

Key external appointments
•  Non-Executive Director 
of Orca Exploration 
Group Inc

•  External Energy Adviser 
for AP Møller Capital

•  Visiting lecturer at 

Witts Business School 
in Johannesburg

MARY JO JACOBI
Employee Engagement  
Non-Executive Director 
N   R  

Date of appointment:
Non-Executive Director 
since 1 January 2014. 
Employee Engagement 
Non-Executive Director 
since April 2018

Independent:
Yes 

Key strengths 
and experience 

Mary Jo is an expert adviser 
on international affairs and 
reputation management and 
contributes a unique skill 
set to the Board. She was 
formerly a senior executive 
of BP America, Royal Dutch 
Shell, Lehman Brothers, 
HSBC Holdings and Drexel 
Burnham Lambert and a Non-
Executive Director of Tate & 
Lyle plc and Mulvaney Capital 
Management. Mary Jo was 
Special Assistant to President 
Ronald Reagan, Assistant 
US Commerce Secretary 
for President George 
H.W. Bush, a British Civil 
Service Commissioner and 
a Member of the Advisory 
Committee on Business 
Appointments. Her vast 
experience, trusted adviser 
credentials and excellent 
communication skills allow 
her to effectively perform 
her duties as Employee 
Engagement Non-Executive 
Director. Mary Jo ensures 
engagement with employees 
and that their voice is heard in 
the Boardroom. 

Key external appointments
•  Advisory Board 
of Rothermere 
American Institute at 
Oxford University.

•  Board of Directors 
of Foundation to 
Restore Accountability

•  International Advisory 
Board, IE University

SIR JIM MCDONALD
Non-Executive Director  
A   N  
Date of appointment: 
1 January 2015

Independent:
Yes

Key strengths 
and experience 
Sir Jim is a highly regarded 
expert in engineering and 
technology and therefore 
contributes specialist 
technical knowledge to 
the Board. He is currently 
the Principal and Vice 
Chancellor of the University 
of Strathclyde and has held 
the Rolls- Royce Chair in 
Electrical Power Systems 
since 1993. He holds a 
number of Non-Executive 
Director roles and co-chairs 
the Scottish Energy Advisory 
Board with the First 
Minister. Sir Jim draws on 
his extensive experience 
to assist the Board to 
approve the development 
of the Group’s technology 
agenda and to provide 
oversight and guidance on 
the sustainable engineering 
solutions that promote the 
success of the Company 
and build on its legacy of 
engineering excellence.

He is Chairman of the Royal 
Academy of Research 
Committee and Chairman 
of the Scottish Engineering 
and Energy Research Pools. 
He is FREng, FRSE, FIET, 
FInstP, FEI.

Key external appointments
•  Non-Executive 

Director of Scottish 
Power Limited

•  Non-Executive Director 

of UK Offshore 
Renewable Energy 
Catapult Board

•  Non-Executive 

Director of National 
Physical Laboratory

•  President of the Royal 

Academy of Engineering

•  Member to the Prime 
Minister’s Council for 
Science and Technology

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

RICK MENELL
Non-Executive Director 

STEPHEN YOUNG
Non-Executive Director  
A*   R   

GRAHAM VANHEGAN
Chief Legal Officer and  
Company Secretary  
S  

Date of appointment:
1 April 2009

Date of appointment: 
1 January 2018

Date of appointment: 
1 May 2018

Independent:
Yes

Independent:
Yes

Independent:
N/A

Key strengths 
and experience 
Graham joined Weir as Chief 
Legal Officer and Company 
Secretary in 2018. He brings 
extensive international legal 
experience and is a trusted 
adviser to the Board on 
all Corporate Governance 
matters. During his 24 year 
career with international 
exploration and production 
company ConocoPhillips, 
he held a number of senior 
positions for the company 
in Asia and North America.

A graduate of the University 
of Glasgow, Graham is a 
solicitor qualified to practice 
in both Scotland and 
England and is an attorney-
at-law before the State Bar 
of New York, USA. 

Key strengths 
and experience 
Stephen is a skilled and 
experienced financial 
professional. He was 
previously Chief Executive 
of Meggitt PLC between 
2013 and 2017, having 
previously served as 
Group Finance Director 
from 2004. Prior to joining 
Meggitt, Stephen was 
Group Finance Director of 
Thistle Hotels plc and the 
Automobile Association.

Stephen’s financial 
background and his 
leadership experience allow 
him to contribute effectively 
both as a Board member 
and as Chair of the Audit 
Committee. His oversight of 
the Group’s Audit function 
helps the Board to ensure 
the ongoing integrity of 
the financial information, 
internal controls and risk 
management frameworks. 

He is a Fellow of the Royal 
Aeronautical Society and 
a council member of The 
University of Southampton.

Key external appointments
•  Non-Executive Director, 
and Audit Committee 
Chair of Mondi PLC

Key strengths 
and experience 
Rick contributes extensive 
mining, international, 
leadership and governance 
skills to the Board. He was 
Senior Independent Director 
from February 2015 until 
January 2020. As previously 
announced, he will step 
down from the Board after 
the 2020 AGM. 

Rick was previously Chief 
Executive of Anglovaal 
Mining and became 
Executive Chairman in 
2002. In 2005, he was 
appointed President and 
Chief Executive of TEAL 
Exploration & Mining Inc. 
He was formerly Chairman 
of Avgold Ltd and Bateman 
Engineering BV. Rick is a 
Senior Adviser to Credit 
Suisse and Chairman of 
Credit Suisse Securities 
(Johannesburg) (Pty) 
Limited. 

He is a fellow of the 
Geological Society (London), 
and both the Australasian 
and South African Institutes 
of Mining and Metallurgy. 

Key external appointments
•  Non-Executive Director 
of Gold Fields Ltd and 
Sibanye Gold Limited, 
both South African 
companies listed on the 
Johannesburg Stock 
Exchange and the New 
York Stock Exchange

EXECUTIVE/NON-EXECUTIVE 

NON-EXECUTIVE NATIONALITY 

COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP KEY

 Executive 

 Non-Executive 

2

9

 British 

 American 

 British/American 

 *  Committee Chair
A*  Audit Committee member
N*  Nomination Committee member
R*  Remuneration Committee member

4

2

1

 South African/American  1

 Dutch 

1

S  Secretary to the Board and Committees

75

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

GROUP EXECUTIVE

PAUL COPPINGER
President of  
Weir Oil & Gas 

PAULA COUSINS
Chief Strategy and 
Sustainability Officer 

GARRY FINGLAND
Chief Information Officer 

RICARDO GARIB
President of  
Weir Minerals 

ROSEMARY MCGINNESS
Chief People Officer 

JON OWENS
President of  
Weir ESCO Division 

Experience:

Experience:

Experience:

Paula joined the Group 
Executive in January 2020 
as Chief Strategy and 
Sustainability Officer.

She joined Weir in 2015 and 
prior to this held a number 
of strategy, commercial, 
and engineering leadership 
roles with Petroineos, BP, 
McKinsey & Company, 
ExxonMobil and Unilever.

Paula has a BEng Hons 
in Chemical and Process 
Engineering and an MPhil 
in Chemical Engineering 
Research, both from the 
University of Strathclyde.

Garry joined Weir in April 
2019 as Chief Information 
Officer (CIO). He has more 
than 25 years’ experience 
with leadership roles in 
complex global technology 
organisations. Before Weir 
he was CIO for healthcare 
provider Bupa, serving on 
its executive committee. 
He has also held senior 
roles with Serco PLC and 
Diageo. A graduate of the 
University of Glasgow, he 
also holds an MBA from the 
University of Strathclyde. 
Garry joined Weir’s 
Group Executive team on 
1 January 2020 retaining his 
title as CIO.

Paul is the President of the 
Oil & Gas Division, based 
in Fort Worth, Texas, USA. 
He has held this position 
since January 2015.

Paul joined Weir in 2011 as 
President of SPM. Prior to 
joining Weir, Paul was the 
President of the Energy 
Group for ten years at 
Circor International, Inc., a 
diversified manufacturer of 
valves and related products. 
He has been a director of 
the Petroleum Equipment 
& Services Association 
since 2007 and has served 
as the Association’s 
Chairman. Paul is presently 
a Non-Executive Director 
and Nominating/Corporate 
Governance Committee 
Chair of Now Inc.

He holds a Bachelor 
of Science degree in 
Petroleum Engineering from 
Texas Tech University.

Experience:
Ricardo joined the Group 
Executive in January 
2016 and is President of 
Weir Minerals. 

Ricardo joined Baker 
Hughes in 1980 and became 
the Managing Director of 
Weir Chile following the 
purchase of Baker Hughes’ 
Minerals Division in 1994 by 
the Weir Group. 

In 2001 he was promoted 
to Regional Managing 
Director of Weir Minerals 
Latin America. Ricardo is 
Vice President of the Mining 
Suppliers Association and 
an elected council member 
of the Board of the Chilean 
Federation of Industry. 
He holds an MBA and is a 
Civil Mechanical Engineer.
He holds a Bachelor 
of Science degree in 
Petroleum Engineering from 
Texas Tech University.

Experience:

Experience:

Jon joined the Group 
Executive in July 2018 
on completion of the 
acquisition of ESCO 
Corporation and is President 
of Weir’s ESCO Division. 

Jon joined ESCO in 1986 
and during his career with 
the company held a number 
of senior operational 
and management roles 
including responsibility for 
the company’s European 
division, Global Operations, 
Global Supply Chain, Mining 
Business Unit and Asia 
Pacific Region. Jon became 
Chief Operating Officer of 
ESCO in 2014 and President 
in 2016. 

Jon is also a Non-Executive 
Director of Columbia 
Machine Inc.

Rosemary joined Weir as 
Chief People Officer in 2017.

Rosemary was Group HR 
Director of William Grant 
& Sons, the international 
premium spirits group, for 
12 years. Having started her 
career in line management 
with Forte Hotels, Rosemary 
has held a range of positions 
covering all aspects of 
Human Resources across 
the globe, including being 
based in New York in her 
role as Senior Vice President 
of HR for document 
management company 
Bowne Business Solutions.

Rosemary is an Advisory 
Board Member to the 
School for CEOs and an 
Advisory Board Member of 
the University of Strathclyde 
Business School. She is also 
a Fellow of the Chartered 
Institute of Personnel 
and Development.

Jon Stanton, John Heasley and Graham Vanhegan are also members of the Group Executive. Their biographical information can be found on the 
previous pages.

GROUP EXECUTIVE BY GENDER 

GROUP EXECUTIVE BY NATIONALITY 

 Male 

 Female 

7

2

 British 

 American 

 Chilean 

 British/American 

5

2

1

1

76

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

COMPANY SECRETARY
The Company Secretary plays a leading role in ensuring the highest standards of governance 
within the Company and ongoing compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018. 
He works with the Chairman to monitor and review the governance processes of the 
Company to ensure that they remain fit for purpose and to consider any improvements that 
could strengthen the existing governance framework to align with best practice and to support 
the delivery of the strategy. The Company Secretary is also the Secretary to the Board 
Committees and provides oversight and support to allow them to function to the highest 
standards and to consistently apply the provisions and principles of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2018. The Board and Committee Framework is shown below.

GRAHAM VANHEGAN
Company Secretary

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Board Committees
The Board has a number of Committees to assist in discharging its responsibilities. The principal Committees are the Nomination, Audit 
and Remuneration Committees. The work of the Committees is essential to the effective operation of the Board. The Committees consider 
matters in greater depth and detail on behalf of the Board. The Committee Terms of Reference are reviewed annually to ensure their 
continuing appropriateness. No one other than the Committee members are entitled to attend a meeting, but others may be invited by 
the Committee to attend all or part of a meeting as and when appropriate and necessary. Professional advisers and members of the 
Senior Management team attend Committee meetings when they are invited to do so. The Board may also set up separate Committees 
to consider specific issues when the need arises.

Board and Committee structure 
The composition of the various Committees along with their accompanying Terms of Reference, the matters reserved to the Board for 
approval and delegated authority matrices combine to create a clear authority matrix across the Group for timely and effective  
decision-making. This structure provides the Board with confidence that important decisions are being taken at the appropriate levels, 
and information flows both up and down the reporting lines.

Nomination Committee
You can read more in the Nomination  
Committee Report on pages 91-93.

Audit Committee
You can read more in the Audit Committee 
Report on pages 94-101.

Remuneration Committee
You can read more in the Remuneration 
Committee Report on pages 102-125.

Disclosure Committee
The Disclosure Committee is a sub-committee of the Board 
which comprises the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial 
Officer and the Chief Legal Officer and Company Secretary.

General Administration Committee
The General Administration Committee is a sub-committee of 
the Board which comprises any two Directors of the Company, 
at least one of whom must be an Executive Director.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

GROUP EXECUTIVE

The Group Executive is responsible for ensuring that each of the Group’s businesses and functions are managed effectively and that the key 
performance indicators of the Group, as approved by the Board, are achieved. Biographical details of the members of the Group Executive 
can be found on page 76. The Group Executive is chaired by the Chief Executive Officer. The Group Executive’s role includes the preparation 
of the Group budget for approval by the Board, management of business performance to achieve the Group budget, establishing and 
maintaining reporting systems which provide clear and consistent information on all aspects of business performance, managing and 
minimising corporate risk and ensuring that the necessary mechanisms are in place to achieve effective inter-divisional coordination in areas 
such as purchasing, branding and career development planning. It also approves major items of capital expenditure within limits authorised 
by the Board. In the period ended 31 December 2019, the Group Executive met 12 times.

Management Committees
In addition to the Board Committees, there are several management Committees, known as Excellence Committees. The Excellence 
Committees have clearly defined remits and work across the Group to promote best practice and information sharing. The Executive Directors 
and members of the Group Executive can delegate their responsibilities to these Committees and utilise the areas of expertise contained 
within them. The Excellence Committees report to the Group Executive and to the Board as required.

Risk Committee

SHE Excellence 
Committee

Finance Excellence 
Committee

Engineering Excellence 
Committee

CEO’s Safety Committee

Group Information 
Services Excellence 
Committee

77

HR Excellence Committee

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The Board of Directors has a collective duty to promote the long-term success of the Company for its stakeholders. The Board sets the 
strategic aims of the Group and provides entrepreneurial and effective leadership. The Board provides oversight and guidance to Senior 
Management to ensure that the necessary resources are in place to achieve the agreed strategy. In determining the long-term strategy and 
objectives of the Group, the Board is mindful of its responsibilities not just to Shareholders but to all the Company’s stakeholders. The Board 
reviews management and financial performance and monitors the delivery of strategy and the achievement of business objectives. At all 
times, the Board operates within a robust framework of internal controls and risk management. The Board also develops and promotes the 
collective vision of the Group’s purpose, culture, values and behaviours.

BOARD COMPOSITION 
During 2019, the Board was comprised of two Executive Directors, and nine Non-Executive Directors including the Chairman. Engelbert Haan 
was appointed to the Board on 18 February 2019. More than half of the Board are Non-Executive Directors who are considered to be 
independent in character and judgement. The roles and responsibilities of the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Senior Independent 
Director are set out in writing and available on the Company’s website. Biographical information on the Board of Directors, including their 
relevant experience, continuing contributions to the Company, expertise and significant appointments, can be found on pages 74 and 75. 
The key responsibilities of the Board and the Company Secretary are set out below. 

CHAIRMAN

CEO

Charles Berry 
•  Leading the Board in an ethical manner and promoting effective 

Board relationships

•  Building a well-balanced Board, considering succession 

planning and the Board’s composition

•  Ensuring the effectiveness of the Board and individual Directors
•  Overseeing the Board evaluation and acting on its results
•  Ensuring appropriate induction and development programmes
•  Setting the Board agenda and chairing the Board meetings
•  Ensuring effective communication with Shareholders and 

other stakeholders

Jon Stanton
•  Planning the Group objectives and strategy for Board approval
•  Ensuring the effective delivery of Board strategy
•  Providing leadership to the Group and communicating the 

Company’s culture, values and behaviours
•  Day-to-day management of the Company

CFO

SENIOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

John Heasley
•  Ensuring an effective financial control environment which is 

compliant with regulations

•  Ensuring effective management of Group capital structure and 

financing needs

•  Provision of timely and accurate financial reporting
•  Assisting in formulating the Group objectives and strategy
•  Day-to-day management of the Company

Barbara Jeremiah 
•  Supporting the Chairman in his duties where necessary
•  Leading the annual review of the performance of the Chairman
•  Being available to Directors and Shareholders with concerns 

that cannot be addressed through the normal channels

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

COMPANY SECRETARY

Clare Chapman, Cal Collins, Ebbie Haan, Mary Jo Jacobi, 
Professor Sir Jim McDonald, Rick Menell, Stephen Young
•  Contributing independent challenge and rigour
•  Assisting in the development of the Company’s strategy
•  Ensuring the integrity of financial information, controls and risk 

management processes

•  Monitoring the performance of the Executive Directors against 

agreed goals and objectives
•  Advising Senior Management
•  Supporting succession planning for the Board and 

Senior Management

Graham Vanhegan
•  Advising the Board on governance, legislation and 

regulatory requirements

•  Ensuring the presentation of high quality information to the 

Board and its Committees, in a timely manner

•  Ensuring best practice in Board procedures
•  Facilitating induction and development programmes
•  Supporting the Chairman and other Board members as 
necessary, including the management of the Board and 
Committees and their evaluation

78

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

SENIOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR OVERVIEW

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

Q. 

HOW DOES THE BOARD 
USE THE COMPANY’S 
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT 
MECHANISMS TO 
MONITOR CULTURE?

A.

We have a range of ways of monitoring our 
culture including employee surveys, ‘Meet 
the Board’ sessions, our ethics hotline and 
SHE data, including reports of any near 
miss incidents. We use these to check on 
the organisational health of the business, 
ensuring we uphold our integrity and 
demonstrate ethical values and leadership. 
The Board also visits two Weir locations 
each year which allows us to have direct 
informal engagement with the workforce on 
a regular basis. The Board defines the culture 
of the organisation and communicates the 
behaviours which are expected throughout 
the Group, as you can see in the ‘We are 
Weir’ strategic framework. That has included 
redefining our purpose in 2019 but more 
generally nurturing a culture of continuous 
improvement, innovation and inclusion to 
ensure a successful and sustainable business. 
We understand not only the importance 
of engaging with employees but of also 
reviewing the engagement mechanisms 
themselves to ensure that they function 
effectively. The Board uses the feedback from 
our people to assist our decision-making 
processes and to ensure that the culture 
and the strategy are aligned. This allows us 
to understand the culture of the Company 
and to determine if the desired behaviours 
and the ‘We are Weir’ framework are being 
adopted throughout the organisation. 
Our Employee Engagement Non-Executive 
Director, Mary Jo Jacobi also regularly 
updates the Board on the effectiveness of 
our engagement tools and any potential areas 
of improvement. The Board also ensures 
that its workforce policies and practices are 
aligned with our values and are implemented 
in order to promote the long-term success of 
the Company.

You can read more about how we engage 
with employees and other Stakeholders in the 
Strategic Report on pages 26-27.

BARBARA JEREMIAH
Senior Independent Director

Q.

HOW DOES THE ROLE OF THE 
SENIOR INDEPENDENT 
DIRECTOR HELP TO ENSURE 
BOARD EFFECTIVENESS?

A.

My role is a combination of providing support 
to the Chairman and an independent ear for 
my fellow Non-Executive Directors for any 
issues that can’t be addressed through direct 
conversations with the Chairman or CEO. 
As such, it is an important role in making the 
Board more effective through having multiple 
lines of communication regarding Board 
issues. For example, supporting the Chairman 
includes providing assistance with the annual 
Board evaluation process and by developing 
effective working relationships among 
Board members.

This support ensures that there is a division 
of responsibilities within the Board and that 
the decision-making process is collaborative 
with the full participation of all Directors. I also 
ensure that at least once a year, there will 
be a meeting of the Non-Executive Directors 
without the Chairman present to review the 
Chairman’s performance and on such other 
occasions as are deemed appropriate.

 Q.

THE UK CORPORATE 
GOVERNANCE CODE 2018 
INTRODUCED NEW 
REQUIREMENTS FOR LISTED 
COMPANIES. HOW DOES WEIR 
ENSURE ONGOING 
COMPLIANCE WITH THE  
NEW CODE?

A.

We take good corporate governance 
very seriously and Weir has been quietly 
leading the way in this area in recent years. 
We welcomed the changes introduced by 
the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 
including its focus on purpose and ensuring 
stakeholders views are appropriately 
considered as part of the decision-making 
process. As Senior Independent Director, 
I also work to ensure that there is effective 
and transparent engagement with our 
Shareholders in order to listen to their 
views and to help to develop a balanced 
understanding of any issues or concerns. 
This engagement allows any potential issues 
to be communicated to the Board and 
addressed accordingly and in a timely manner.

You can read more about our Board’s 
effectiveness and the evaluation process on 
page 86.

You can read more about how we ensure 
ongoing compliance with the UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2018 on pages 72-90.

79

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

BOARD MEETINGS

The Board meets regularly in order to effectively discharge its duties. Board meetings are held in person or by video-conferencing. During 2019 
there were eight scheduled meetings. The table below details the attendance at Board meetings of each Director during their term of office 
for the period to 31 December 2019. Due to business requirements, on occasion unscheduled Board meetings are required to be called at 
short notice. This can result in some Directors being unable to attend due to prior commitments. Directors who are unable to attend still have 
the opportunity to review the relevant Board papers and provide their feedback accordingly. In October 2019, the Board meeting was held in 
Santiago, Chile. Full details of the Board’s visit to Chile can be found on page 85.

In addition to formal Board meetings, the Board maintains an open dialogue throughout the year and contact by telephone occurs whenever 
necessary. As encouraged by the Code, the Non-Executive Directors met during the year without Executive Directors present. The Board’s 
annual timetable is discussed at least 12 months prior to its commencement to allow the Directors to plan their time accordingly. The 2020 
annual timetable was discussed at the Board meeting in 2018 and circulated as soon as it was finalised. The 2021 timetable was reviewed 
during 2019. This process ensures that the Chairman can be comfortable that each Director is able to devote the time and resources required 
to act as a Director during that period. The system for establishing the agenda items means that both the Chairman and the Board have the 
confidence that all required items are included at the most appropriate time of the year and there is sufficient time allocated for discussion 
by the Board, allowing the Directors to discharge their duties effectively. 

During the year, the Chairman, supported by the Chief Executive Officer and Company Secretary, maintained a rolling 12-month agenda for 
Board and Committee meetings. At each meeting, the Board received reports from the Chief Executive Officer and other members of the 
Group Executive. This included updates and information on safety, strategy, legal and financial matters. The Board also receives updates 
from each Committee Chair on items from the most recent Committee meeting as well as periodic updates as required. Standing items 
also included reviewing the Group’s risk dashboard and internal controls, safety, strategy and succession planning.

In order to effectively discharge their duties, the Non-Executive Directors met regularly with Senior Management and received presentations 
by members of the Group’s Senior Management team and other external advisers, as required. 

BOARD MEETING ATTENDANCE 2019
Scheduled Board meetings

23-Jan-19

25-Feb-19

30-April-19

25-Jun-19

25-Jul-19

05-Sep-19

24-Oct-19

16-Dec-19

Total

Charles Berry 
(Chairman)

Jon Stanton

John Heasley

Rick Menell

Clare Chapman

Cal Collins

Ebbie Haan

Mary Jo Jacobi

Barbara Jeremiah

Sir Jim McDonald

Stephen Young

–

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Scheduled Scheduled Scheduled Scheduled

Scheduled

Scheduled Scheduled Scheduled

100%

Location

Glasgow

London

Glasgow Fort Worth Video-conference  Glasgow

Chile

London

100%

80

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

BOARD INDUCTIONS, DUTIES AND RE-ELECTION

BOARD APPOINTMENTS 
New appointments to the Board are subject 
to a formal, rigorous and transparent 
appointment procedure. Directors are 
recommended and considered on merit 
against objective criteria and with due regard 
for the benefits of diversity on the Board and 
their existing time commitments to ensure 
they can effectively discharge their duties. 

BOARD INDUCTIONS AND TRAINING
When a new Director is appointed to the 
Board, they receive a tailored induction 
programme which is designed to reflect 
the Non-Executive Director’s background, 
experience, knowledge and their appointment 
to the relevant Board Committee. 
The induction covers the Company’s history, 
culture, strategy, structure, operations, 
policies and other relevant documentation.

 The induction process also covers the 
Corporate Governance Framework, the Board 
and Committee process, Board calendars 
and training on the Code of Conduct and 
Directors’ Duties. As part of their induction, 
new Directors also meet with Senior 
Management of the Company, receive a 
formal briefing on legal and governance 
matters from the Company Secretary or 
his Deputy, and undertake visits to the 
Company’s operations. The Chairman 
regularly reviews and agrees with each 
Director their training and development 
needs. Additional induction and training is 
also available to new Committee members 
as required. Training is also built into the 
Board meetings, with relevant topics being 
covered as appropriate. Following on from 
the induction period, the Board receives 
additional training and development 
opportunities at regular intervals throughout 
the year. These include deep dives, site 
visits, Board dinners and breakfast meetings, 
training and information sessions, briefing 
materials on the Board portal and meetings 
with Senior Management on key topics 
affecting the Company. In addition to their 
duties enshrined in the Companies Act 2006, 
Directors are informed of important changes 
to laws and regulations affecting the Group’s 
businesses and their duties as Directors. 
The Board is supplied with information in a 
timely manner to enable it to discharge its 
duties. The Chairman ensures that Non-
Executive Directors are properly briefed on 
any issues arising at Board meetings and that 
Non-Executive Directors have the ability to 
communicate with the Chairman at any time. 

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

relation to the relationship between the Group 
and the University of Strathclyde, whether in 
relation to WARC or otherwise.

RE-ELECTION TO THE BOARD
The Board was pleased that the resolution 
put forward at the 2019 AGM to re-appoint 
Rick Menell received votes in favour of 
over 75%, but noted that support for his 
re-election was not as strong as that shown 
for other Directors. The reasons behind the 
decision to propose Rick’s re-election beyond 
the nine-year term were explained in our 
2018 Annual Report which highlighted the 
benefits of his continued service during a 
time of change to both Board composition 
and portfolio transformation. As required by 
the Corporate Governance Code 2018, the 
Board thought very carefully about Rick’s 
independence when assessing whether 
to propose that he serve a further year 
and specifically considered the matter of 
Rick’s tenure in considering the extension 
of his appointment as Senior Independent 
Director. The Board maintains a programme 
of active engagement with our Shareholders 
and will continue to take their views into 
account. Board Committee composition and 
succession planning for the role of Senior 
Independent Director was already a pre-
planned agenda item to be discussed at the 
June 2019 Nomination Committee meeting, 
prior to the AGM 2019 results. As previously 
announced, Rick Menell stepped down from 
all Board Committees on 25 June 2019, as 
Senior Independent Director in January 2020 
and will step down from the Board at the 
2020 AGM. 

In accordance with the Company’s Articles 
of Association and good practice, all other 
Directors on the Board at 31 December 
2019 will seek re-election at the Company’s 
AGM in April 2020, in compliance with the 
Code. The Executive Directors have contracts 
of service with one year’s notice, whilst 
Non-Executive Directors’ appointments 
can be terminated with six months’ notice. 
The letters of appointment of the Chairman 
and the Non-Executive Directors are available 
for inspection at the Company’s registered 
office and set out the required commitment 
the Director must have to the Company. 
Further details can also be found in the 
Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 
102-103. Details of the Directors’ service 
contracts, emoluments, the interests of the 
Directors in the share capital of the Company 
and options to subscribe for shares in the 
Company are disclosed in the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report on pages 102-125. 

DIRECTORS AND THEIR 
OTHER INTERESTS
The Board recognises that it is important 
for Directors to have a diverse range of 
experience and the benefit that external 
appointments in other companies can 
provide for both the individual Director and 
to the Board as a whole. In light of this, 
Directors may be permitted to take up 
external appointments and directorships in 
other companies upon having requested 
and received prior written approval from 
the Board. When considering new external 
appointments for existing Directors, the Board 
takes into account a range of considerations, 
including the Directors’ current commitments, 
the time requirement involved, the role 
and responsibilities of the external position 
and the potential impact on the Company. 
The Board also considers the benefits that 
the external appointment may bring such 
as greater commercial experience, gaining 
expanded Board level experience and a 
broader perspective from being in a new 
environment. If the external appointment is 
considered to be beneficial to the Company’s 
stakeholders by allowing the Director to 
gain experience and new skills which will 
ultimately promote the success of the 
Company, it may be approved by the Board.

Under the Companies Act 2006, a Director 
of a company must avoid a situation in which 
he or she has, or can have, a direct or indirect 
interest that conflicts with, or may possibly 
conflict with the interests of the Company. 
The Company has a formal procedure in place 
to manage the disclosure, consideration and, 
if appropriate, the authorisation of any such 
possible conflict. Each Director is aware of 
the requirement to notify the Board, via the 
Company Secretary, as soon as they become 
aware of any possible future conflict or a 
material change to an existing authorisation. 
Upon receipt of any such notification, the 
Board, in accordance with the Company’s 
Articles of Association, will consider the 
situation before deciding whether to 
approve the perceived conflict. Overall, the 
Board is satisfied that there are appropriate 
procedures in place to deal with conflicts 
of interest and that they operate effectively. 
None of the Non-Executive Directors have 
any material business or other relationship 
with the Company or its management. Sir Jim 
McDonald is the Principal and Vice Chancellor 
of the University of Strathclyde, but he has 
no direct involvement on a day-to-day basis 
in relation to the Weir Advanced Research 
Centre (WARC) which is operated by the 
Company in conjunction with the University 
of Strathclyde. Nevertheless, he will offer 
to recuse himself from any discussions in 

81

 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

BOARD ACTIVITIES

The undernoted timeline summarises 
the Board’s activities during the course 
of the year ended 31 December 2019. 
Although this is by no means exhaustive, the 
timeline provides a flavour of our Boardroom 
activities, discussions and debates. 

The ‘We are Weir’ framework was launched 
in 2016 and in light of learnings and the new 
governance standards, this was re-evaluated 
in 2019 ready for relaunch in 2020. The Board 
was extensively engaged throughout the 
process of this redevelopment.

The Board also had two ‘Meet the Board’ 
sessions during the year to engage with 
employees, in Fort Worth, USA and in 
Santiago, Chile. The Non-Executive Directors 
also carried out site visits during the year. 
Barbara Jeremiah visited our facilities in 
Dubai, UAE, in June 2019 and Ebbie Haan 
visited our facilities in Venlo, Netherlands 
in August 2019. The Board Agenda is 
split between standing items, which are 
discussed at the start of every meeting and 
the timeline below shows the other items 
for discussion during the year. 

Standing items at the start of every 
Board Meeting:

•  Updates from the relevant 

Committee Chairs

•  Business Reports from the CEO and CFO
•  Conflicts
•  Reminder of s.172 duties
•  Balanced Scorecard Report
•  Corporate Services Report (this is 

where the Board routinely reviews the 
reports arising from the whistleblowing 
mechanism – the ethics hotline)

•  Shareholder & Market Analysis

READ MORE ABOUT OUR GOVERNANCE IN ACTION ON PAGE 85

BOARD ACTIVITY TIMELINE 2019

JANUARY 

Safety
•  SHE Update
Governance
•  Annual Report Update 
•  Gender Pay Report 
Finance
•  Dividend Considerations 
Risk
•  Risk Committee Update 

FEBRUARY 

Finance
•  Q1 Forecast Update
Governance
•  Annual Report and Financial Statements
•  Notice of Meeting
•  2018 Annual Results Announcement
•  Global Compliance – Updated Code of 

Conduct – Ethics Hotline Annual Review 
– Modern Slavery Statement Update

Employee Engagement
•  Employee Engagement Survey Results 

82

APRIL 

Strategy
•  Technology Update
•  Investor Perception Study
Governance
•  AGM 
Employee Engagement
•  Employee Voice 
•  Employee ShareBuilder

 
BOARD ACTIVITY TIMELINE 2019

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

SEPTEMBER

Strategy
•  Intellectual Property Strategy
Governance
•  ABC policy and outline of 

policy framework

•  Employee Engagement 
•  Legal and Governance 
Education Session

Stakeholder Engagement 
•  IR Feedback on 2019 Interims

JUNE 

Strategy
•  Q1 IMS Update
Governance
•  2021 & 2022 Board Calendar  
Stakeholder Engagement
•  Divisional Reviews
•  Investor Perception Survey 
Employee Engagement
•  People/Succession Planning
•  ‘Meet the Board’ session in Fort Worth, 

USA

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

DECEMBER

Strategy
•  ‘We are Weir’ 
•  Sustainability Roadmap
•  People/Succession/Inclusion/Diversity
Governance 
•  Conflicts of Interest Annual Review
•  Board Evaluation
•  Balanced Scorecard 2020 priorities
Finance
•  Viability Statement
•  2020 Budget
•  NED fees
Stakeholder Engagement 
•  Q3 IMS feedback

OCTOBER

Strategy
•  Q3 IMS
•  Strategy Session
Risk
•  Risk Workshop
Stakeholder Engagement
•  ‘Meet the Board’ session in Santiago, 

Chile

•  ‘Meet the Board’ session feedback

JULY

Safety
•  SHE update 
Strategy
•  Group Executive Strategy Outputs
Governance
•  Sir John Parker Review
•  Board Calendar 2020 
Finance
•  Interim Dividend Proposal
Risk
•  Risk Reporting Framework
•  Global Insurance Programme Update

83

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

ENGAGEMENT WITH OUR SHAREHOLDERS

2
0
1
9

FEBRUARY 
•  Full Year results
•  Investor roadshow London
•  Equity sales force 

meetings x2

APRIL 
•  Q1 IMS 
•  Annual General Meeting

JUNE 
•  Investor roadshows Helsinki, 

Paris and Frankfurt

•  Conference JP Morgan 

(London)

AUGUST 
•  Investor roadshow, London
•  Equity sales force briefing

DECEMBER 
•  Capital Markets Day, Venlo

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
The Board recognises that the ongoing 
success of the Group depends on developing 
establishing and maintaining strong 
relationships with all our Shareholders. 
The Company’s investor relations programme 
includes formal presentations of full year 
and interim results and meetings with 
individual investors. Through this programme, 
the Company has directly engaged with 
289 investors in 2019 either face-to-face 
or via telephone or video-conferencing. 
The Company also engages with its 
Shareholders through its attendance at 
investor conferences held by the financial 
community and roadshows and investor 
relations events held by the Company, of 
which there were 21 during the year, held in 
The Netherlands, Canada, Finland, France, 
Germany, Sweden, the UK and the USA. 
The primary means of communicating with 
the Company’s Shareholders are the Annual 
and Interim Reports. Both are available on 
the Company’s website. The website also 
contains information on the business of the 
Company, Corporate Governance, Group 
press releases, Company news, key dates 
in the financial calendar, investor factsheets 
and other important Shareholder information.
The Board is committed to the constructive 
use of the AGM as a forum to meet with 
Shareholders and to hear their views and 
answer their questions about the Group 
and its business. The Board including the 
Senior Independent Director and Chairs of 
the Board Committees will be available to 
answer questions relevant to the work of 
the Board and the Committees. During 2019 
the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief 
Financial Officer, Senior Independent Director 
and Chair of the Remuneration Committee 
have met or had contact with analysts and 
institutional Shareholders to keep them 
informed of significant developments and 
report to the Board accordingly on the views 
of these stakeholders. Each of the other 
Non-Executive Directors is also offered the 
opportunity to attend meetings with major 
Shareholders and would do so if requested 
by any major Shareholder. During the year, 
the Group appointed Rothschild & Co to 
complete an Investor perception study on 
its behalf. The survey covered both existing 
Shareholders and potential holders, providing 
the Group with detailed feedback on how 
investors perceive it across a broad number 
of key areas including strategy, financial 
performance and structure, valuation, 
corporate governance and ESG, management, 
investor relations and communications. 
The results of this feedback have now been 
incorporated back into the Group’s strategy, 
planning and investor communications.

WHAT WE DID IN 2019

MARCH 
•  Investor roadshows in 

Edinburgh, New York, Boston 
and Toronto

•  Conference Bank of America 

Merrill Lynch (London)

MAY 
•  Sell side analysts lunch 

with CFO

•  Equity sales force briefing

JULY 
•  Half year results
•  Investor roadshow, London
•  Equity sales force briefing

SEPTEMBER 
•  Investor roadshows in 

Edinburgh, Toronto, Boston 
and New York

•  Conference Morgan Stanley, 

London

NOVEMBER 
•  Q3 IMS 
•  Investor roadshows 
in Frankfurt, Paris 
and Stockholm

•  Sell side analysts dinner with 

CEO and CFO

84

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

GOVERNANCE IN ACTION: ‘MEET THE BOARD’ SESSION

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

Meet the Board, Chile

At the core of our ‘We are Weir’ framework 
lies our commitment to developing and 
sustaining mutually-successful relationships 
with all our stakeholders. 

As a global organisation, creating 
environments where equal opportunities 
can be fostered and shared is of the utmost 
importance. We seek to continuously build 
engagement with our people and promote 
an open and transparent culture, fostering 
genuine and meaningful dialogue.

We already have in place a broad range of 
ways to engage with employees and we 
continue to develop and enhance these 
channels on an ongoing basis to ensure 
employees feel that their voice counts and 
that they can make a positive impact both 
on their individual and our collective success 
at Weir. 

The most recent channel to be introduced is 
‘Meet the Board’; an opportunity for a  
face-to-face discussion between employees 
and the Board, where participating employees 
can discuss the most important topics 
to them.

The first ‘Meet the Board’ session was held 
in Fort Worth, Texas in June 2019 with 20 
colleagues from across the USA taking part. 
This was led by Mary Jo Jacobi, our Non-
Executive Director with Board responsibility 
for employee engagement and was also 
attended by our Chairman (Charles Berry), 
our Senior Independent Director (Rick Menell) 
and our Chief Executive Officer (Jon Stanton). 

In October 2019, our second ‘Meet the 
Board’ session took place in Santiago, Chile. 
Led again by Mary Jo Jacobi, 18 employees 
from our site in Santiago engaged with a 
selection of the Weir Board Members. 

During both sessions, Board Members and 
participants spent two hours in discussions, 
with the employees getting the chance to 
share insights and ideas with the Board. 
Participants found the session highly engaging 
and the Board Members valued the insights 
provided. The key insights gathered are 
currently being considered both locally and 
at Board level. 

Further ‘Meet the Board’ sessions will be 
rolled out in 2020, including a UK-based 
session amongst others across the globe, 
in line with the Board meeting schedule. 

Meet the Board, Chile 

85

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION

BOARD EFFECTIVENESS
The review of the Board’s effectiveness helps the Board continuously improve its own performance and in turn the performance of the 
Company. The Board is committed to performing to a high standard and it considers that it has the right combination of skills, experience, 
independence and knowledge to be effective in meeting the needs of the Group. The combination of individuals’ skills and style ensures that 
the Board is sufficiently balanced and that no individual or group of individuals can dominate the decision-making process. It also allows for an 
effective division of responsibilities and accountabilities within the Board and its Committees.

BOARD EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW

The Board Effectiveness Review operates on a three-year cycle. This year, we carried out an internal evaluation of the Board and its 
Committees led by the Chairman and the Company Secretary and facilitated by The Effective Board LLP.  The process is detailed in the table 
below. The findings of this year’s Review have been positive and confirmed that the Board and its Committees operate effectively and that 
each Director contributes to the overall effectiveness and success of the Group.

Year 1 – 2018
Internal Evaluation

Year 2 – 2019
Internal Evaluation

•  Circulate findings report from 

•  Circulate findings and review 

previous year

•  Online confidential 

bespoke questionnaire

recommendations from previous year

•  Online confidential 

bespoke questionnaire

•  Analysis and discussion at Board  

•  Analysis and discussion at 

meeting

Board meeting

Year 3 – 2020
External Evaluation

•  Interviews

•  Observation

•  Analysis and discussion at 

Board meeting

•  Individual meetings with Chairman 

and Directors post evaluation

The process was divided into four stages:

Stage 3
The Board Effectiveness 
report was sent to the 
Chairman and the Committee 
Effectiveness reports were 
provided to each of the 
Committee Chairs.

The effectiveness reports 
of the Chairman and 
Company Secretary 
were sent to the SID and 
Chairman respectively.

Follow up meetings were 
held with the Chairman.

Stage 4
The Chairman presented 
the findings from the 
Review to the Board at 
the December 2019 Board 
meeting and actions for the 
forthcoming year agreed. 
The Committee Chairs 
presented the Committee 
Effectiveness Reports at 
their Committee meetings 
in December 2019 and 
January 2020. 

Progress against outcomes from 2018
•  The talent development and succession planning processes 

were further developed. Succession Planning is a standing item 
on every Nomination Committee Agenda and regular Board 
Agenda item.

•  The Board has made significant efforts on diversity, but further 

scope to improve ethnicity remains work in progress. You can read 
about our progress on Diversity on page 92.

Key Areas of Focus for 2020/2021
•  Increasing improvements on succession planning for Group 

Executive and Senior Management.

•  Increasing focus on wider aspects of Diversity. 

Stage 2
The online questionnaire 
was completed by 
the Board and the 
Company Secretary.

Stage 1
The questionnaire was split 
into various categories; 
Success, Strategy, Board 
Composition, Executive 
Team, Financial and 
Operational Resources, 
Communication with 
Employees, Shareholders 
and other Stakeholders, 
Performance Measurement 
Systems, Risk Management 
Systems and Board’s 
processes, procedures 
and resources.

Outcomes from 2018 
•  Continue to focus on Succession Planning below Executive level.
•  Support the further enhancement of Diversity.

Findings from 2019
•  There was an increase in positive views of the Board’s 

effectiveness overall. In particular, the positive relationship 
between Board members and Board discussions are viewed as 
open, rigorous and constructive.

•  The Board has made significant efforts on Diversity, but further 

scope to improve ethnicity remains work in progress.

•  The Board currently supports and monitors the development and 
implementation of the Sustainability Strategy however it should 
consider a new Committee of the Board for the oversight of the 
Sustainability Strategy.

•  It was agreed that there was a marked improvement in the Board’s 
employee engagement, with processes for listening to employees’ 
views and appropriate response procedures and action plans. 

86

 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

BOARD STATEMENTS

COMPLIANCE WITH THE UK CORPORATE 
GOVERNANCE CODE 2018

VIABILITY STATEMENT

The Company has fully complied with all the principles of the 
Code for the year ended 31 December 2019, and from that date 
to the date of approval of this Annual Report.

READ MORE IN OUR CORPORATE 
GOVERNANCE REPORT PAGES 72-90

GOING CONCERN BASIS

The Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group has 
adequate resources to continue to operate for a period of at least 
12 months from the date of approval of the financial statements. 
For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in 
preparing the financial statements.

In forming this view, the Directors have reviewed the Group’s 
budgets, plans and cash flow forecasts, including market 
downturn sensitivities.

In addition, the Directors have considered the potential impact 
of credit risk and liquidity risk detailed in note 29 to the Group 
financial statements on pages 190-196. Each of these items 
has been considered in relation to the Group’s banking facilities 
described in note 19 on pages 174-175.

In accordance with provision 31 of the UK Corporate Governance 
Code 2018, the Directors have assessed the viability of the 
Group over a three-year period, taking into account the Group’s 
current position and the potential impact of the principal risks 
documented on pages 50-59 of the Annual Report. Based on this 
assessment, the Directors confirm that they have a reasonable 
expectation that the Company will be able to continue in 
operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period to 
31 December 2022.

READ MORE IN OUR RISK REVIEW:  
HOW WE MANAGE RISK PAGES 50-59 AND IN OUR 
VIABILITY STATEMENT ON PAGE 90

ROBUST ASSESSMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL RISKS 
FACING THE GROUP AND ANNUAL REVIEW OF 
SYSTEMS OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL 
CONTROL

During the year, the Board has reviewed the effectiveness of the 
systems of risk management and internal control and conducted 
a robust assessment of the principal risks affecting the Group in 
line with the Risk Appetite Statement. These activities meet the 
Board’s responsibilities in connection with Risk Management 
and Internal Control set out in the UK Corporate Governance 
Code 2018.

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

READ MORE IN OUR DIRECTORS’ 
REPORT PAGES 126-128

READ MORE IN OUR RISK REVIEW:  
HOW WE MANAGE RISK PAGE 50

FAIR, BALANCED AND UNDERSTANDABLE

MODERN SLAVERY STATEMENT

The Directors consider that the Annual Report and Financial 
Statements, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and 
understandable and provide the information necessary for 
Shareholders to assess the Group’s performance, business model 
and strategy.

As a Company, we understand our role in eradicating modern 
slavery. Following an extensive review of our existing policies 
and practices in light of the Modern Slavery Act, the Company 
prepares an annual Modern Slavery Statement and has developed 
a training programme.

READ MORE IN OUR STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ 
RESPONSIBILITIES PAGE 129

A COPY OF THIS STATEMENT CAN  
BE FOUND ON OUR WEBSITE:
www.global.weir/site-information/ 
modern-slavery-statement.pdf

87

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

FIRST YEAR AS NON-EXECUTIVE

EBBIE HAAN
Non-Executive Director

Q.

HOW WOULD YOU SUM UP 
YOUR FIRST YEAR AS A  
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 
AT WEIR?

A.

In two words, excited and energised. 

I am excited about what Weir stands for, 
it is rich in history, and to be part of the 
Group’s ongoing transition is very exciting. 
I was energised from my first interview, 
when I researched Weir and learned about 
the ‘We are Weir’ framework. My specific 
attention was drawn to the place people 
play in that framework as I believe people 
create and give energy. Weir has a large 
pool of human talent to leverage, with 
different backgrounds, different skills and 
this is something that energises me as 
well as Weir’s ability to adapt itself to 
continuing change. 

With our heritage and history, we should 
continue to be reflective, careful, and don’t 
just change for change sake, but be thoughtful 
about our change. With Weir’s 150th 
anniversary coming up, we must continue to 
keep our eye on the future and the present.

Q.

AT WEIR WE CONTINUE 
TO FOCUS ON ESG, WHAT 
ARE YOUR THOUGHTS 
AROUND GOVERNANCE?

A.

Governance is fundamental and it can 
sometimes be used as a buzz word, however, 
I like to keep it simple. I believe sticking to 
the rules and doing the right thing is the 
simplest form of governance. That means 
having the processes and procedures in 
place that guide decision-making, and on the 
‘softer’ side, having social, ethical and cultural 
frameworks, which are all part of governance. 
It is about doing the right thing in all areas. 
Good governance starts with the Board, and 
just like safety, is everyone’s responsibility.

We are a global company with a UK listing and 
we need to find a balance with governance. 
Given the cultural diversity in Weir, where we 
are operating in over 50 countries, we should 
always ensure we do the right thing and that 
rules are not broken whilst also making sure 
we keep governance in the correct context. 
For me Governance is not about a tickbox or a 
checklist, in a world that is adaptive we should 
seek open dialogue to make things better, be 
open and chat about it and make it an even 
better place.

Q.

WHAT DO YOU THINK THE 
CHALLENGES ARE FOR WEIR?

A.

The biggest challenge for any business is to 
stay relevant to its customers. If you do that 
success will follow. It is something I know Jon 
Stanton and the management team spend a 
lot of time thinking about as you can see in 
the ‘We are Weir’ strategy. Fundamentally, 
Weir is in the business of finding solutions 
to customers’ toughest challenges. That’s 
what engineers do and Weir has been doing 
it successfully for almost 150 years. But no 
business should ever get complacent. For me, 
the key to longevity is leading the change in 
your markets because standing still is rarely 
an option. And that’s where we go back to 
Weir’s culture. If challenging the status quo 
is part of your DNA, you have an excellent 
chance of long-term success.

88

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

ACCOUNTABILITY

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE 
AND AUDITORS
Details on the roles and responsibilities of 
the Audit Committee and its members can 
be found in the Audit Committee Report on 
pages 94-101. Information on the Company’s 
external auditors is contained within the 
Audit Committee Report.

Internal Control and Risk Management
In accordance with the Code and the  
accompanying Guidance on Risk 
Management and Internal Controls, the 
Group has an ongoing process for identifying, 
evaluating and managing the significant 
risks through an internal control framework. 
This process has been in place throughout 
2019. More information on how the Group 
seeks to manage risk can be found on 
pages 50-59.

The Board in seeking to achieve the Group’s 
business objectives, cannot offer an 
absolute guarantee that the application of 
a risk management process will overcome, 
eliminate or mitigate all significant risks. 
However, by further developing and operating 
an annual and ongoing risk management 
process to identify, report and manage 
significant risks, the Board seeks to provide 
a reasonable assurance against material 
misstatement or loss.

The Audit Committee conducted a review of 
the effectiveness of the Group’s systems of 
internal control and risk management during 
2019, as detailed on page 95.

Functional and front line controls
This includes a wide spectrum of controls 
as seen in most organisations, including, 
for example: standard operating procedures 
and policies; a comprehensive financial 
planning and reporting system, including 
quarterly forecasting; regular performance 
appraisals and training for employees; 
restricted access to financial systems and 
data; delegated authority matrices for review 
and approval of key transactions; protective 
clothing and equipment to protect our people 
from harm; IT and data security controls; 
business continuity planning; and assessment 
procedures for potential new recruits.

Monitoring and oversight controls
There is a clearly defined organisational 
structure within which roles and 
responsibilities are articulated. There are 
monitoring controls at operating company, 
regional, divisional and Group level, 
including standard key performance 
indicators, with action plans to address 
underperforming areas.

OUR INTERNAL CONTROL FRAMEWORK HAS FOUR KEY LAYERS:

S
K
S
R

I

4

ETHICAL AND CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT

3

ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES

2

MONITORING AND OVERSIGHT CONTROLS

1

FUNCTIONAL AND FRONT LINE CONTROLS

89

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

A compliance scorecard self-assessment 
is completed and reported by all operating 
companies twice per annum. The scorecard 
assesses compliance with Group policies 
and procedures.

Financial monitoring includes comparing 
actual results with the forecast and prior year 
position on a monthly and year to date basis.

Significant variances are highlighted to 
Directors on a timely basis, allowing 
appropriate action to be taken.

Assurance activities
We obtain a wide range of assurance to 
provide comfort to management and the 
Board that our controls are providing adequate 
protection from risk and are operating as we 
would expect.

As shown in the Board and Committee 
structure set out on page 77, various internal 
and external sources of assurance report to 
the Board and to management. These sources 
of assurance were reviewed by the Board 
during the year, and principally comprise 
external audit, internal audit, SHE audits, legal 
and intellectual property audits, engineering 
audits and IT audits.

The various audit teams plan their activities on 
a risk basis, ensuring resources are directed 
at the areas of greatest need. Issues and 
recommendations to enhance controls are 
reported to management to ensure timely 
action can be taken, with oversight provided 
from the relevant governance committees, 
including the Audit Committee and the 
Excellence Committees.

Ethical and cultural environment
We are committed to doing business at all 
times in an ethical and transparent manner. 
This is supported by the Weir values which 
are the core behaviours we expect our people 
to live by in their working lives. The Weir 
Code of Conduct also contributes to our 
culture, providing a high benchmark by which 
we expect our business to be conducted. 
Any examples of unethical behaviour are dealt 
with robustly and promptly.

The Ethics section on page 59 within the Risk 
Review provides more details on the Group’s 
activities to promote ethical behaviour.

The Group’s internal control procedures 
described on page 95 of the Audit Committee 
Report do not cover joint venture interests. 
We have Board representation on each of our 
joint venture companies, where separate, 
albeit similar, internal control frameworks have 
been adopted.

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

VIABILITY STATEMENT

The geographical and sector diversification 
of the Group’s operations helps minimise 
the risk of serious business interruption 
or catastrophic damage to our reputation. 
While the Group remains exposed to the 
cyclicality of the markets in which it operates, 
it continues to have a strong balance sheet 
that provides capacity in which to operate. 
In addition, our ability to flex our cost base to 
reflect our existing markets, as demonstrated 
in recent years, protects our viability in the 
face of adverse economic conditions and/or 
additional risks highlighted.

While this review does not consider all 
of the risks that the Group may face, the 
Directors consider that this stress testing 
based assessment of the Group’s prospects 
is reasonable in the circumstances of the 
inherent uncertainty involved.

LONG-TERM PROSPECTS  
AND VIABILITY
In accordance with provision 31 of the UK 
Corporate Governance Code 2018, the 
Directors have assessed the viability of the 
Group over a three-year period, taking into 
account the Group’s current position and 
the potential impact of the principal risks 
documented on pages 54-59 of the Annual 
Report. Based on this assessment, the 
Directors confirm that they have a reasonable 
expectation that the Company will be 
able to continue in operation and meet its 
liabilities as they fall due over the period to 
31 December 2022. 

The Directors have determined that a  
three-year period to 31 December 2022 is an 
appropriate period over which to provide its 
Viability Statement. The Group’s key markets 
are by nature cyclical and therefore, while the 
Group operates a five-year strategic planning 
process, market cyclicality and the related 
lack of visibility over commodity prices in 
particular indicate that a period of three years 
is appropriate. We believe that this approach 
presents the Board and readers of the 
Annual Report with a reasonable degree of 
confidence over this longer-term outlook.

The strategic plan is a bottom up analysis 
prepared annually and submitted to the 
Board for consideration. The output of this 
plan is used to perform central debt and 
headroom profile analysis, which includes a 
review of sensitivity to ‘business as usual’ 
risks, such as profit growth, working capital 
variances and return on capital investment. 
This analysis, in conjunction with the current 
year results and 2020 Budget, provides the 
basis for the viability model on which we have 
overlaid a number of severe but plausible 
events to reflect our risk assessment and 
then further stress-tested that scenario. 
The Audit Committee, on behalf of the Board, 
have reviewed the underlying processes 
and key assumptions underpinning the 
Viability Statement. 

In making this statement, in addition to 
considering the work of the Audit Committee, 
the Board considered the longer-term 
prospects of the Group, as detailed in the 
Strategic Report, and carried out a robust 
assessment of the principal risks facing the 
Group, including those that could threaten 
its business model, future performance, 
solvency or liquidity.

While the review has considered all the 
principal risks identified by the Group, 
the following risks were focused on for 
enhanced stress testing: market volatility, 
modelled by applying downturn scenarios 
and major customer shocks; technology, 
competition and Value Chain Excellence, 
modelled by significant loss of market share 
and pricing pressure in key markets; Value 
Chain Excellence and information security, 
modelled by major site shutdown scenarios; 
and, a regulatory shock scenario in response 
to the ethics and governance or safety, 
health and environmental risks. We believe 
that the stress-testing adequately covers 
risks associated with the recent outbreak 
of Coronavirus. We also considered, but did 
not model the impact of Brexit. While these 
situations remain uncertain, they are not 
expected to have a material impact on the 
Group’s viability. Refer to pages 54-59 for the 
Group’s principal risks, specifying those risks 
considered during this review.

The resulting scenarios were modelled 
as a series of individual one-off ‘shocks’, 
in combination with commodity price 
based market downturn scenarios with the 
assessment taking into consideration the 
potential impact on the Group’s profits and 
cash flows and resulting impact on banking 
covenants as well as the likelihood of bank 
and other debt facilities continuing to be 
available to the Group as existing committed 
facilities mature over the next three years.

90

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

NOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT

THE NOMINATION 
COMMITTEE PLAYS 
A VITAL ROLE. THE 
BOARD BELIEVES 
THAT EFFECTIVE 
SUCCESSION 
PLANNING IS VERY 
IMPORTANT FOR 
THE LONG-TERM 
SUCCESS OF THE 
COMPANY AND THAT 
THERE IS A CLEAR LINK 
BETWEEN SUCCESSION 
PLANNING, DIVERSITY 
AND THE STRATEGY 
AND CULTURE OF 
THE COMPANY. 

CHARLES BERRY
Chair of Nomination Committee

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

CHARLES BERRY
Chair of Nomination Committee

ROLE OF THE COMMITTEE
The Nomination Committee has responsibility for considering the size, structure and 
composition of the Board, for reviewing Director and Senior Management succession plans, 
overseeing the development of a diverse pipeline for succession, retirements and appointments 
of Directors and for making appropriate recommendations of candidates to the Board so as to 
maintain an appropriate balance of skills, experience and diversity on the Board.

NOMINATION COMMITTEE MEETING ATTENDANCE

Members
Charles Berry
Mary Jo Jacobi
Barbara Jeremiah1
Sir Jim McDonald
Rick Menell2

22-Jan-19

25-Jun-19

18-Dec-19

–

–

Scheduled

Scheduled

–
Scheduled

Total
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%

1  Barbara Jeremiah was appointed to the Committee on 25 June 2019. 

2  Rick Menell stepped down from the Committee on 25 June 2019.

NOMINATION COMMITTEE AT A GLANCE

Main activities of the Nomination 
Committee during 2019
•  Recommended Board and Committee 

changes; appointment of Barbara 
Jeremiah as Senior Independent 
Director and member of Nomination 
Committee, appointment of Ebbie Haan 
as Audit and Remuneration Committee 
member, extension of tenure of 
Rick Menell and stepping down as a 
member of Remuneration, Audit and 
Nomination Committees, and extension of 
appointment of Chairman.

•  Undertook Board skills assessment and 

gap analysis.

•  Ensured Board and Senior Management 
succession planning aligned with our 
strategy and culture.

•  Reviewed Director re-election at 

•  Monitoring the succession planning for 

Group Executive and Senior Management. 

Committee Membership and attendance
The Nomination Committee is entirely made 
up of Independent Non-Executive Directors 
and the Chairman of the Board as Chair 
of the Committee. The members of the 
Committee are set out in the table above. 
The Company Secretary, Graham Vanhegan, 
acts as Secretary to the Committee. 
There were three Committee meetings 
held during the year. Members of Senior 
Management and Advisers are invited to 
attend meetings as appropriate. Jon Stanton, 
Chief Executive Officer, attended all three 
meetings by invitation. 

forthcoming AGM in line with the UK 
Corporate Governance Code 2018.
•  Reviewed the Nomination Committee 
Terms of Reference in line with the UK 
Corporate Governance Code 2018.
•  Considered the Hampton-Alexander 
Review in line with our strategy, 
succession plans and Inclusion and 
Diversity policies.

Areas of Focus for 2020
•  Continuing to focus on monitoring and 

assessing our culture.

•  Further enhancing and overseeing of 
the leadership and talent framework 
and pipeline.

•  Supporting the work of the team 

established to look at diversity across 
the Group.

91

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

NOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT
CONTINUED

DEAR SHAREHOLDERS, 
I am pleased to introduce our Nomination 
Committee report for 2019 which explains 
the Committee’s focus and activities during 
the year, and also highlights the Committee’s 
key priorities for 2020. I continue to ensure 
that the Committee focuses on Inclusion 
and Diversity, succession planning and on 
ensuring that the size, composition and 
structure of the Board is appropriate for the 
delivery of the Group’s strategy and that 
all relevant provisions of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2018, continue to be met.

BOARD COMPOSITION AND SKILLS
The Nomination Committee recommends 
appointments to the Board based on the 
existing balance of skills, knowledge and 
experience on the Board, on the merits 
and capabilities of the candidate and on 
the time they are able to devote to the 
role in order to promote the success of 
the Company. The Nomination Committee 
have reviewed the Board and Committee 
composition and considers that the Board 
and Committees consists of individuals with 
the right balance of skills, diversity, time 
commitments, experience and knowledge to 
provide strong and effective leadership of the 
Group. During the year the Board consisted 
of up to nine Non-Executive Directors and 
two Executive Directors, who together 
bring a diverse and complementary range 
of backgrounds, personal attributes and 
experience. The Board skills and experience 
matrix, as detailed on page 93 is reviewed 
by the Nomination Committee annually, 
bearing in mind the future requirements 
of the Board. Committee membership is 
periodically refreshed and the Nomination 
Committee recommended some changes to 
the composition of the Board Committees, as 
highlighted on page 91 and in the respective 
Committee Reports. 

BOARD APPOINTMENT AND TENURE
Engelbert (Ebbie) Haan was appointed to the 
Board on 18 February 2019. The details of the 
appointment process were published in the 
2018 Annual Report. You can read more on the 
Board’s appointment process on page 81 and 
Ebbie’s first year as a Non-Executive Director 
on page 88 of this Annual Report.

SUCCESSION PLANNING
The Nomination Committee continues to 
give full consideration to succession planning 
for the Board and Senior Management, 
with a pro-active approach taking into 
account the challenges and opportunities 
facing the Company, and what skills and 
expertise are therefore needed on the Board. 
Succession Planning is an agenda item 
at every Nomination Committee meeting 

and annually reviews the schedule on the 
length of tenure of the Chairman and  
Non-Executive Directors and the mix of skills, 
strengths and experience of the Directors. 
The Committee will continue to keep under 
review succession planning for the Board, and 
Senior Management. 

APPOINTMENT OF SENIOR 
INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR (SID)
As part of the Board succession plan 
Barbara Jeremiah was identified as a 
potential successor to the role of SID. 
The Nomination Committee recommended 
that Barbara Jeremiah, Non-Executive 
Director be appointed as SID on 1 January 
2020. This allowed a transition prior to the 
retirement of the previous SID, Rick Menell, 
on 28 April 2020. Barbara joined the Board 
in 2017 and her experience and knowledge 
of Weir meant that she was the perfectly 
qualified person for the role. You can read 
more about Barbara in her role as SID on 
page 79.

INCLUSION AND DIVERSITY
The Board acknowledges the benefits 
that a diverse pool of talent can bring. 
The Committee takes an active role in 
meeting Inclusion and Diversity objectives. 
We are committed to ensuring that a third 
of the Board, Group Executives members 
and their direct reports are female. 
Our objective of driving the benefits of 
a diverse board, Senior Management 
team and wider workforce is underpinned 
by our Board Diversity Policy and our 
Inclusion, Diversity & Equality Policy. 
These policies can be viewed on our website 
at https://www.global.weir/investors/
corporate-governance/boarddiversitypolicy. 
The Nomination Committee reviewed the 
Board Diversity Policy in light of the UK 
Corporate Governance Code 2018 and Board 
Effectiveness Guidance and recommended to 
the Board for approval in January 2020. 

The Board keeps the policies under review 
to ensure that they remain an effective 
driver of diversity in its broadest sense, 
fully taking account of gender, ethnicity, 
social background, skillset and breadth 
of experience. We continue to work 
towards achieving the Hampton-Alexander 
Review targets and to improving the 
gender diversity in the Senior Leadership 
population. Goals have been incorporated 
into the balanced scorecard of the Company. 
I continue to be a member of the steering 
group of the Hampton-Alexander Review. 

92

The current levels are noted below.

As at 31 December 2019
Board

27%  
(3 females, 8 males)
28%  
(16 females, 42 males)

Group Executive 
Committee and 
direct reports

Further information regarding our approach 
and initiatives on Inclusion and Diversity can 
be found on page 62.

INDEPENDENCE AND RE-ELECTION 
OF DIRECTORS
During the year the Committee recommended 
the re-appointment of the Chairman to the 
Board for a further three-year term, subject 
to annual re-election by Shareholders. 

In December 2019, the Board conducted its 
annual review of individual Director conflict 
authorisations as recorded in the Conflicts 
of Interest Register. The Conflicts of Interest 
Register is maintained by the Company 
Secretary and sets out any actual or potential 
conflict of interest situations which a Director 
has disclosed to the Board in line with their 
statutory duties. This is in addition to Conflicts 
as a regular standing item on every Board and 
Committee Agenda.

In order to form a view surrounding 
Director independence, the Committee 
review the above conflict authorisations 
and consideration was also given to other 
appointments held by each Director. 
The Nomination Committee also reviewed 
and considered the independence of each 
Non-Executive Director in line with the 
UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 
and Guidance on Board Effectiveness. 
With the exception of Cal Collins, the 
Nomination Committee considers that all of 
the Non-Executive Directors are independent. 

The Nomination Committee discussed the 
re-election of Directors and how the Directors 
have contributed to the long-term success of 
the Company and why each Director should 
be re-elected. The skills matrix as well as the 
relevant outcomes of the annual individual 
Director evaluations.

COMMITTEE EFFECTIVENESS
The Committee’s effectiveness was reviewed 
during the year as part of the internal 
Board Effectiveness Review facilitated by 
The Effective Board LLP. Their report was 
presented to the Board in December 2019. 
I am pleased to confirm it concluded that 
the areas of responsibility of the Nomination 
Committee continued to be performed well. 
You will find more information on the Board 
Effectiveness Review cycle, process and 
findings on page 86.

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

BOARD APPOINTMENT AND TENURE

Length of tenure at 31 December 2019

Director

1
year

2
years

3
years

4
years

5
years

6
years

7
years

8
years

9
years

10
years

Date of
appointment

Date of 
Re-election

John Heasley

3 years, 2 m

Barbara Jeremiah

2 years, 5 m

Cal Collins

1 year, 5 m

Charles Berry1

6 years, 10 m

Clare Chapman

2 years, 5 m

Engelbert Haan

10 m

Jon Stanton2

9 years, 8 m

Mary Jo Jacobi

6 years

Rick Menell3

10 years, 9 m

Sir Jim McDonald

5 years

Stephen Young

2 years

3 October 2016

28 April 2020

1 August 2017

28 April 2020

12 July 2018

28 April 2020

1 March 2013

28 April 2020

1 August 2017

28 April 2020

18 February 2019

28 April 2020

19 April 2010

28 April 2020

1 January 2014

28 April 2020

1 April 2009

–

1 January 2015

28 April 2020

1 January 2018

28 April 2020

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

Notes
1    Charles Berry was appointed to the Board as a Non-Executive Director on 1 March 2013. He became Chairman on 1 January 2014.
2    Jon Stanton was appointed to the Board as Finance Director on 19 April 2010. His tenure as Finance Director was six years, five months. 
3    Rick Menell steps down from the Board post AGM on 28 April 2020.

Previous appointment

Current appointment

BOARD SKILLS AND ATTRIBUTES

Director

Independence Engineering

Mining

Oil & Gas

Governance

Environment &
Sustainability

Banking 

and Finance International

Leadership

Charles Berry

Jon Stanton

John Heasley

Clare Chapman

Cal Collins

Engelbert Haan

Mary Jo Jacobi

Barbara Jeremiah

Sir Jim McDonald

Rick Menell1

Stephen Young

1  Rick Menell steps down from the Board post AGM on 28 April 2020.

93

 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE 
HAS CONTINUED TO 
MEET ITS PRIMARY 
OBJECTIVE OF 
PROVIDING EFFECTIVE 
GOVERNANCE OVER THE 
GROUP’S FINANCIAL 
REPORTING DURING THE 
YEAR AND ENSURING 
THE SYSTEMS 
SUPPORTING INTERNAL 
CONTROLS REMAIN 
EFFECTIVE. 

STEPHEN YOUNG
Chair of Audit Committee

STEPHEN YOUNG
Chair of the Audit Committee

AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING ATTENDANCE

Members
Stephen Young (Chair)
Ebbie Haan1
Barbara Jeremiah
Sir Jim McDonald2
Rick Menell3

22-Jan-19

20-Feb-19

25-July-19

24-Oct-19

—

—

—

Scheduled

Scheduled

Scheduled

Scheduled

—

—

Total
100%
100%
100%
75%
100%

1  Ebbie Haan joined the Audit Committee on 25 June 2019.

2  Sir Jim McDonald could not attend the Audit Committee on 20 February 2019 due to a short illness. 

3  Rick Menell stepped down from the Audit Committee on 25 June 2019 but attended subsequent meetings by invitation.

KEY MATTERS DISCUSSED BY THE COMMITTEE

Committee membership
•  Ebbie Haan joined the Committee 

replacing Rick Menell on 25 June 2019.

•  Committee members considered to 
provide wide range of financial and 
commercial expertise.

Main activities
•  We reviewed and challenged interim 

and annual financial reporting, including 
the impact of the new UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2018 and IFRS 16 
‘Leases’ standard.

•  We reviewed processes supporting 

risk management including compliance 
scorecard and received presentations 
from Divisional Finance Directors and 
internal audit.

•  We reviewed the results of internal audits 
in the year, including greater focus on the 
results for the recently acquired ESCO 
Division. We agreed the 2020 internal 
audit plan and welcomed Tayo Oyinlola, 
new Head of Internal Audit, to the Group.

•  We approved the external audit plan 
presented by PwC, reviewed the 
effectiveness of the external audit and 
held independent discussions with the 
lead audit partner.

Independence
•  We confirmed the external auditor, PwC, 
remains independent and that non-audit 
fees remain minimal.

Committee Effectiveness
•  The Committee was subject to an internal 

evaluation and no significant areas of 
concern were raised.

Areas of focus 2020
•  Reviewing the Group’s procedures in 
relation to maintaining high standards 
across all Ethics and Compliance matters.
•  Supporting the recently appointed Head 

of Internal Audit in her first full year in the 
role and increasing the use of technology 
in the internal audit process.

94

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

INTRODUCTION 
I am pleased to present our report 
to Shareholders for the year ended 
31 December 2019 which outlines how the 
Committee has fulfilled its key objective 
of providing effective governance over the 
Group’s financial reporting during the year, 
and also highlights the Committee’s key 
priorities for 2020.

AREAS OF FOCUS
Our key objective is achieved by focusing on, 
amongst other things:

•  the adequacy of accounting policies and 

disclosures, as well as the areas requiring 
significant estimates or judgements;

•  the performance of both the internal audit 

function and the external auditor; and

•  oversight of the Group’s systems of internal 
control, and the framework for identification 
and management of business risks and 
related assurance activities. 

MEMBERSHIP
The members of the Committee, other 
than myself, are Sir Jim McDonald, Barbara 
Jeremiah and Ebbie Haan, all of whom are 
independent Non-Executive Directors. Sir Jim 
McDonald, Barbara Jeremiah and I have 
been members of the Committee for the 
full year. Ebbie Haan replaced fellow Board 
member Rick Menell on the Committee 
on 25 June 2019. The Company Secretary, 
Graham Vanhegan, acts as Secretary to 
the Committee.

We have recent and relevant financial 
experience from myself as Audit Committee 
Chair, having been Group Finance Director 
of Meggitt PLC. The remaining Committee 
members have, through their other business 
activities, significant experience in financial 
matters. They have been selected with the 
aim of providing the wide range of financial 
and commercial expertise necessary to fulfil 
our responsibilities. Summary biographies 
have been presented on pages 74 and 75.

MEETINGS
We met four times during the year and 
have met twice since the year end. 
Each Committee meeting normally takes 
place prior to a Board meeting, during which 
I provide a report on our activities. 

We met twice with the external auditors 
without any Executive management present. 
This provides us with the opportunity for any 
issues of concern to be raised by, or with, 
the auditors. We also met once with the 
Head of Internal Audit without any Executive 
management present.

We have the ability to call on Group 
employees to assist in our work and to obtain 

any information required from Executive 
Directors in order to carry out our roles and 
duties. We are also able to obtain outside 
legal or independent professional advice 
if required. 

The table below details the Board members 
and members of Senior Management 
who were invited to attend meetings 
as appropriate during the calendar year. 
In addition, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
(PwC) attended the meetings by invitation 
as auditors to the Group.

Committee membership in 2019
Stephen Young (Committee Chair)
Ebbie Haan
Barbara Jeremiah
Sir Jim McDonald
Rick Menell

Other regular attendees (by invitation)
Charles Berry, Chairman
Jon Stanton, Chief Executive Officer
John Heasley, Chief Financial Officer
Kirsten McCargo, Group Financial Controller
Tayo Oyinlola, Head of Internal Audit
Lindsay Gardiner (PricewaterhouseCoopers 
LLP, Group Audit Partner)

MAIN ACTIVITIES 
Over the course of the year since the last 
Annual Report, our work was focused in the 
following areas:

(i) financial reporting;

(ii) internal control and risk management;

(iii) internal audit; and

(iv) external audit.

The following sections provide more detail 
on our specific items of focus under each of 
these headings, explaining the work we, as a 
Committee, have undertaken and the results 
of that work.

(i) Financial reporting
Our principal responsibility in this area is 
the review and challenge of the actions and 
judgements of management in relation to 
the interim and annual financial statements 
before submission to the Board, paying 
particular attention to:

•  critical accounting policies and practices, 

and any changes therein;

•  decisions requiring significant judgements, 
areas of significant estimate, or where 
there has been discussion with the 
external auditor;

•  the existence of any errors, adjusted or 
unadjusted, resulting from the audit;

95

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

•  the clarity of the disclosures and 

compliance with accounting standards and 
relevant financial and governance reporting 
requirements, including an assessment of 
the adoption of the going concern basis 
of accounting and a review of the process 
and financial modelling underpinning the 
Group’s Viability Statement; and

•  the processes surrounding the compilation 

of the Annual Report and Financial 
Statements with regard to presenting a fair, 
balanced and understandable assessment 
of the Group’s position and prospects.

We received formal reports from the Chief 
Financial Officer and the external auditor, 
summarising the main discussion points 
for both the Interim Report in our July 
2019 meeting and Annual Report during our 
January and February 2020 meetings. 

We received and reviewed details of the 
significant exceptional items in the year, 
including the impairment charges taken 
in relation to Oil & Gas North America. 
In addition, we received regular updates in 
respect of the new accounting standard, IFRS 
16 ‘Leases’, during the year and amendments 
to other standards where relevant. 

In September 2019, as part of their regular 
programme of reviews, the Group received 
a letter from the Financial Reporting Council 
(FRC) requesting information in relation to 
specific disclosures in the Group’s 2018 
Annual Report. The FRC’s role in such reviews 
is to consider compliance with reporting 
requirements. Due to inherent limitations 
in their review, these are not intended to 
provide assurance that corporate accounts are 
materially correct. However, we are pleased 
to report that the FRC enquiries were brought 
to a satisfactory close in January 2020.

The financial reporting matters discussed in 
the current year and recurring agenda items 
are summarised in the table on pages 98 
to 101. 

(ii) Internal control and risk management
While overall responsibility for the Group’s risk 
management and internal control frameworks 
rests with the Board, the Audit Committee 
has a delegated responsibility to keep under 
review the effectiveness of the systems 
supporting risk management. Further details 
on accountability for Risk Management are 
provided in the Corporate Governance Report 
on page 89.

Our work in this area was supported by 
reporting from the Head of Internal Audit 
on the results of the programme of internal 
audits completed; the overall assessment 
of the internal control environment; and in 
addition, reporting, either verbal or written, 

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
CONTINUED

from Senior Management covering any 
investigations into known or suspected 
fraudulent activities. We continue to note the 
work undertaken for the Board on a review of 
the sources of assurance which are mapped 
against the principal risks (see (iii) Internal 
audit below) and the outputs from the Board 
risk workshop held during the year.

The Committee also receives regular reporting 
on the Group’s compliance-related activities 
from the Chief Legal Officer and Company 
Secretary and also the Head of Internal Audit. 
This includes reviewing compliance with the 
Group’s Ethics Helpline programme which 
provides a mechanism for employees with 
concerns about the conduct of the Group 
or its employees to report their concerns. 
The Committee ensures that appropriate 
arrangements are in place to receive and 
act proportionately upon a complaint 
about malpractice. The Committee takes a 
particular interest in any reports of possible 
improprieties in financial reporting. 

The Committee also received presentations 
from each of the three divisional Finance 
Directors (DFDs). These presentations 
included a review of the divisional risk 
dashboards, significant findings from the 
internal audit visits and the Compliance 
Scorecard process over the last 12 months, 
as well as an overview of their divisional 
finance teams. 

Focus is given to:

1.  the strength and depth of the finance 

team’s capability;

2.  the quality and efficiency of responses to 
findings of internal audit visits, including 
whether learning has been shared more 
widely across the Group to mitigate the risk 
of recurrence and to share good practice; 
and 

3.  the quality of the discussion around 

divisional risk dashboards. 

The Compliance Scorecard is a control 
mechanism whereby each operating company 
undertakes self-assessments, every six 
months, of their compliance with Group 
policies and procedures, including key 
internal controls across a range of categories 
including finance, anti-bribery and corruption, 
tax, treasury, trade and customs, HR, IT 
and legal. As far as the elements relating to 
finance are concerned, these cover (but are 
not limited to) management accounts and 
financial reporting, balance sheet controls, 
employee costs and other financial policies. 
Each operating company is expected to 
prepare and execute action plans to address 
any weaknesses identified as part of the self-
assessment process. 

Operating companies are required to 
retain evidence of their testing in support 
of their self-assessment responses. 
Internal audit has responsibility for confirming 
the self-assessment during planned visits. 
Any significant variances are reported to 
local, divisional and Group management. 
Any companies reporting low levels 
of compliance are required to prepare 
improvement plans to demonstrate how 
they will improve over a reasonable period 
of time. The overall compliance scores (as 
a percentage) are tracked over time and 
reported to the Audit Committee twice a year, 
with the Committee paying particular attention 
to the variances between self-assessed 
and internal audit assessed scores as well 
as trends and the performance of newly 
acquired companies. 

(iii) Internal audit
In September 2019, Tayo Oyinlola was 
appointed as Head of Internal Audit, 
replacing David Kyles. Tayo is a member 
of the Association of Chartered Certified 
Accountants, has an MBA from Oxford 
Brookes Business School and has completed 
the Risk Leadership programme with Cass 
Business School.

She joins us from Intu Properties plc, a 
FTSE 250 company, where she was Head of 
Internal Audit.

The Committee has a responsibility to monitor 
the effectiveness of the Group’s internal audit 
function. During the year, the Head of Internal 
Audit provides me with copies of all internal 
audit reports, and presents the results of audit 
visits and progress against the internal audit 
plan to the Committee, with particular focus 
on high priority findings and the action plans, 
including management responses, to address 
these areas.

Private discussions between myself and 
the Head of Internal Audit are held during 
the year and at least once a year with the 
full Committee. 

The above activities provide broad coverage of 
the function and a good sense of the control 
environment. This also allows us to ensure the 
function is effective (which includes assessing 
the independence of the function), adequately 
resourced and has appropriate standing within 
the Company.

One of the main duties of the Committee is 
to review the Annual Internal Audit Plan and 
to ensure that internal audit remains focused 
on providing effective assurance. As part of 
the Group’s risk management procedures, 
key sources of assurance are mapped against 
the Group’s core processes and this is used 
to ensure internal audit planning considers 

96

wider internal assurance risk indicators. 
Planning is assisted by a risk modelling tool 
which is subject to ongoing refinement as 
the risk landscape changes. The resulting 
2020 plan continues to focus the largest 
proportion of resource on financial assurance 
whilst incorporating wider risk assurance 
coverage, both financial and non-financial, 
as described below. 

The factors considered when deciding which 
businesses to audit and the scope of each 
audit, including consideration of the number 
of visits to each operating company in the 
Group on a cyclical basis are, amongst other 
things, the volatility of end markets, critical 
system or Senior Management changes in 
the year, financial results, the timing of the 
most recent internal audit visit, assessments 
from other assurance reviews undertaken and 
whether the business is a recent acquisition. 

In addition, the emergence of any common 
themes or trends in the findings of recent 
internal audits or compliance scorecard 
submissions (see previous section) is taken 
into consideration. 

For 2020, the IT assurance programme is 
focused on the Group’s IS transformation 
strategy and programme assurance and 
IT-enabled change programmes. 

Also, as part of the Annual Plan, reviews are 
to be undertaken to assess compliance with 
Weir’s Code of Conduct procedures, including 
anti-bribery and corruption. This includes areas 
such as policy and procedures, employee 
training, relationships with agents, accounting 
for employee expenses and corporate 
hospitality and gifts. Finally, an element of 
the Annual Plan is reserved for assurance 
coverage of any emerging risk areas.

The Committee considered and approved 
the 2020 Internal Audit Strategy and Plan 
including the resource model, which will 
include additional resource supplemented as 
necessary by guest auditors from across the 
Group, including Group Finance, Tax and other 
functions as appropriate. Further progress 
on embedding data analytics into the audit 
process is included in the 2020 plan. 

(iv) External audit
The Audit Committee is responsible for the 
appointment and role of the external auditor, 
for reviewing the effectiveness of the audit 
process and monitoring their independence. 
The external auditors are PwC who were first 
appointed for the financial year commencing 
1 January 2016 following a competitive 
tender process.

The Group applied the principles of the 
2018 Code in its 2018 Annual Report and 
has continued to embed the changes in this 
report. The provisions in Section 4 of the 2018 
Governance Code on audit and risk are largely 
the same as before. The key addition to the 
reporting requirements is a new obligation for 
companies to carry out a robust assessment 
of emerging risks as well as principal risks, 
explaining what procedures are in place to 
identify these risks and how these are being 
managed or mitigated. Further details of 
the Board workshop held to review the key 
principal risks and identify emerging risks are 
provided in the Risk Review on pages 50-51. 

Our focus for 2020
In addition to our routine business, in 2020 
our focus will be on:

1.  Reviewing the Group’s procedures in 
relation to maintaining high standards 
across all Ethics and Compliance matters; 
and

2.  Supporting the recently appointed Head of 
Internal Audit in her first full year in the role 
and increasing the use of technology in the 
internal audit process. 

STEPHEN YOUNG
Chair of Audit Committee

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

AUDITOR EFFECTIVENESS
The effectiveness of the external audit 
process is highly dependent on appropriate 
audit risk identification at the start of the audit 
cycle and the quality of planning. PwC present 
their detailed audit plan to the Committee 
each year identifying their assessment of the 
key risks, amongst other matters.

Our assessment of the effectiveness and 
quality of the audit process covers a number 
of other matters, including a review of the 
reporting from the auditors to the Committee, 
a review of the latest FRC Audit Quality 
Inspection report on PwC and also by 
seeking feedback from management on the 
effectiveness of the audit process. Overall, 
management were satisfied that there had 
been appropriate focus and challenge on the 
primary areas of audit risk and assessed the 
quality of the audit process to be satisfactory. 

The Committee holds private meetings with 
the external auditor at least once each year 
to provide additional opportunity for open 
dialogue and feedback from the Committee 
and the auditor without management being 
present. Matters typically discussed include 
the auditor’s assessment of business risks 
and management activity thereon, the 
transparency and openness of interactions 
with management, confirmation that there 
has been no restriction in scope placed on 
them by management and how they have 
exercised professional scepticism. We also 
meet with the lead audit partner outside 
the formal committee process as necessary 
throughout the year. These interactions 
are also important in our assessment of 
audit quality.

Based on the work carried out, we are of 
the view that the quality of the audit process 
is satisfactory.

INDEPENDENCE POLICY AND  
NON-AUDIT SERVICES
A formal policy exists (see www.global.weir) 
which provides guidelines on any non-audit 
services which may be provided and ensures 
that the nature of the advice to be provided 
cannot impair the objectivity of the auditor’s 
opinion on the Group’s financial statements. 
The policy makes it clear that only certain 
types of service are permitted to be carried 
out by the auditors. All permitted non-audit 
services require the approval of the Chief 
Financial Officer and, where the expected 
cost of the service is in excess of £75,000, 
the approval of myself, the Audit Committee 
Chair. If non-audit fees approach £0.5m 
during a calendar year, the Committee will 
consider imposing additional restrictions on 
non-audit services. The auditor confirms their 
independence at least annually.

Fees payable to PwC in respect of audit 
and assurance services for 2019 of £3.3m 
(2018: £3.8m) were approved by the 
Committee after a review of the level and 
nature of work to be performed and after 
being satisfied by PwC that the fees were 
appropriate for the scope of the work 
required. The reduction in level of fees in 
2019 is due to the removal of Flow Control 
related fees and work in relation to the ESCO 
opening balance sheet in 2018.

Non-audit fee work conducted by PwC in the 
year of £0.1m (2018: £0.4m) represented 3% 
(2018: 10%) of the audit fee. We are of the 
view that the level and nature of non-audit 
work does not compromise the independence 
of the external auditor.

Having considered the relationship with PwC, 
their qualifications, expertise, resources and 
effectiveness, the Committee concluded that 
they remained independent and effective 
for the purposes of the 2019 year end. As a 
result, the Committee recommended to the 
Board that PwC should be reappointed as 
auditor at the next AGM.

COMMITTEE EVALUATION
The Committee was subject to an internal 
evaluation process during the year as part of 
the overall Board Effectiveness Review which 
operates on a three-year cycle. The evaluation 
was carried out using confidential online 
questionnaires in conjunction with 
‘The Effective Board LLP’.

The evaluation concluded that the 
Committee was performing well and no 
significant areas of concern were noted. 
Several recommendations were made which 
have since been discussed by the Committee 
and actions taken where necessary.

OUR FOCUS FOR 2019
In last year’s report we said that, in addition 
to our routine business, we would increase 
focus on the following two areas: 

1.  Assurance and controls in the newly 

acquired ESCO Division as integration 
progresses; and

2.  Responding to changes in the UK Corporate 

Governance Code 2018.

The ESCO Division was subject to three 
separate financial assurance focused internal 
audit visits during 2019 with results from 
each demonstrating a strong overall control 
environment. The vast majority of findings 
were of low significance and fully closed 
out by the end of the financial year with the 
remaining few actions outstanding on track 
for completion in 2020.

97

 
Conclusion

The Committee agrees 
with the accounting 
treatment and disclosure 
of these items in the 
Annual Report.

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
CONTINUED

CURRENT YEAR MATTERS

Area of focus

Issue

Role of the Committee

Exceptional 
items 
(see notes 
5 and 21 of 
the financial 
statements)

Management exercises 
judgement on the 
classification of certain 
items as exceptional.

We have received detailed reporting from the Chief Financial Officer 
covering the following aspects of the exceptional charges: 
(i)  charge/credit by division, including the nature of the items;
(ii)  analysis of the exceptional impairment charge booked in 

relation to Oil & Gas North America and explanation of the work 
undertaken by management to assess the carrying value of the 
assets held;

(iii) analysis of the ESCO integration costs;
(iv)  analysis of restructuring and rationalisation charges and related 

provisions; and

(iv)  disclosure of the amounts and related narrative reporting.
Our work has focused on ensuring that these items were 
exceptional due to their size, nature and/or frequency. 
With specific regard to Oil & Gas North America, we carefully 
considered the total exceptional impairment charge of £546m in 
light of current market uncertainty and future outlook and the related 
impact on future revenues and profitability of the business.
We considered the impairment of inventory of £49m to be 
reasonable given the prolonged market downturn, and uncertain 
timing of market recovery and the associated increased risk of 
technological obsolescence.
We reviewed details of the property, plant & equipment impairment 
of £25m and considered this appropriate based on the low levels 
of asset utilisation due to the prolonged market downturn and 
uncertain timing of market recovery.
We reviewed the impairment of £184m booked in relation to 
specific intangible assets (brand names and customer relationships) 
within Pressure Control North America and determined this 
to be appropriate based on the lower levels of revenue due to 
the prolonged market downturn and uncertain timing of market 
recovery.
Finally, we reviewed the impairment of goodwill (see ‘Impairment’ 
section) before concluding that the accounting treatment in respect 
of Oil & Gas North America was appropriate.
We noted the items reflected the way in which we, as members of 
the Board, reviewed the underlying performance of the Group and 
were disclosed appropriately. We also received confirmation from 
PwC that management’s treatment was appropriate.
Consideration was also given to the current balance sheet position 
of all related exceptional provisions, including both new provisions 
and those remaining from previous years, with management 
providing details of the remaining liabilities and expected utilisation.

Discontinued 
operations 
(see note 8 of 
the financial 
statements)

Following initial disclosure 
as a discontinued 
operation in 2018, the 
Group disposed of 
Flow Control in 2019 
recognising a loss on sale. 

We have received detailed reporting from the Chief Financial Officer 
covering:
(i)  accounting treatment of Flow Control as a discontinued operation;
(ii) calculation of the loss on sale; and
(iii)  related presentation and disclosures in the Annual Report.
We considered the accounting treatment, the loss on sale and 
related disclosures. PwC confirmed the treatment and related 
disclosures were appropriate.

The Committee agrees 
with the discontinued 
operations accounting 
treatment, the loss on 
sale calculation and the 
related disclosures in the 
Annual Report.

New 
accounting 
standards
(see note 2 of 
the financial 
statements)

The introduction of new 
accounting standards 
has required changes 
in accounting policy, 
treatment and disclosures.

We have received detailed reporting from the Chief Financial Officer 
covering the impact of adopting IFRS 16 ‘Leases’ and related 
changes to policy and disclosures in the Annual Report.
We considered the impact and reviewed related disclosures in the 
Annual Report. We have received confirmation from PwC that they 
are in agreement with the disclosures.

The Committee agrees 
with the transition 
statement and related 
disclosures in the Annual 
Report.

98

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Area of focus

Issue

Role of the Committee

Impairment
(see note 14 
of the financial 
statements)

Management undertakes 
an annual detailed, formal 
impairment review 
of goodwill and other 
intangible assets, with 
judgements made on the 
relevant Cash Generating 
Units and estimates 
of available headroom. 
Particular attention has been 
paid this year to the Oil & 
Gas North America CGU in 
light of current prolonged 
market downturn.

The most significant estimates are in setting the assumptions 
underpinning the calculation of the value in use of the Cash 
Generating Units (CGUs). We specifically reviewed: 
(i)  the achievability of the long-term business plan numbers and 

macroeconomic assumptions underlying the valuation process;
(ii)  long-term growth rates and discount rates used in the cash flow 

models for all of the CGUs; and

(iii) the cash flow models and market conditions supporting the 
goodwill impairment of £288m and resulting sensitivity analysis 
prepared for Oil & Gas North America CGU.
Business plans and budgets were Board-approved and underpin the 
cash flow forecasts.
We have reviewed the disclosures in the financial statements and the 
related narrative, including the sensitivity analysis performed for the 
Oil & Gas North America CGU. We also received confirmation from 
PwC that they are in agreement with management’s conclusions.

RECURRING AGENDA ITEMS

Area of focus

Issue

Role of the Committee

Provisions
(see note 21 
of the financial 
statements)

Significant balance sheet 
provisions are underpinned 
by management’s key 
judgements on obligating 
events and timeframes 
over which a reliable 
estimate for provision 
values can be made.

The focus of the Audit Committee was on the exceptional 
provisions, including the linkage to the charges recorded in 
the Income Statement, and the employee-related provisions, 
specifically the element in respect of US asbestos-related claims.
The Committee’s work in relation to exceptional items is discussed 
in the previous section. 
With regard to the US asbestos-related provision, following the 
triennial actuarial review in 2017, the Committee’s focus was centred 
on gaining an understanding of:
(i)  the actual claims and settlement data and their relation to the 
assumptions that underpin the discounted cash flow model;
(ii)  the period over which the liability can be reasonably estimated;
(iii)  the position with regard to availability of insurance cover; and
(iv)  the adequacy and transparency of the disclosures in note 21.
PwC provided confirmation that management’s assumptions were 
reasonable.
With regard to other provisions (other than inventory – see below), 
we examined the key movements between the opening and closing 
provision balances and challenged management on the commercial 
drivers which caused them. 

Conclusion

We are satisfied that the 
goodwill impairment charge 
in the Oil & Gas North 
America CGU is supported 
by the underlying analysis 
and the carrying value of 
the underlying assets in 
other CGUs is maintained.

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

Conclusion

We are satisfied that 
the current provisioning 
levels and approach 
are appropriate, as is 
the recognition of an 
insurance asset in relation 
to the US asbestos 
provision.

Pensions
(see note 23 
of the financial 
statements)

The valuation of 
pension liabilities can be 
materially affected by the 
assumptions utilised by 
management on areas 
such as discount and 
inflation rates. 

We received from management details of the key assumptions 
underpinning the valuation, taking assurance from the fact that 
external advice had been taken by the Company and that PwC had 
benchmarked these assumptions to their own internal ranges and 
consider them appropriate.

The Committee was 
satisfied with the 
assumptions and related 
pension disclosures.

99

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
CONTINUED

Conclusion

Based on the work we 
have undertaken, we are 
satisfied that the position 
presented in these 
financial statements, 
including the disclosures, 
is appropriate.

Based on the information 
provided, the Committee 
concluded that 
management action had 
been effective and that 
the level of provisioning 
appeared adequate.

The successful 
completion of this work 
has been reported to the 
Board.

Area of focus

Issue

Role of the Committee

Tax charge and 
provisioning
(see notes 
7 and 22 of 
the financial 
statements)

The tax position is 
complex, with a number of 
international jurisdictions 
requiring management’s 
judgement with regards 
to effective tax rates, 
tax compliance and tax 
provisioning.

Management applies 
estimates on inventory 
valuation and provisioning.

Inventory 
valuation
(see note 16 
of the financial 
statements)

Fair, 
balanced and 
understandable

The Board is required to 
state that the Group’s 
external reporting 
is fair, balanced and 
understandable.
The Audit Committee is 
requested by the Board to 
provide advice to support 
the assertion.

The Audit Committee receives a detailed report from the Chief 
Financial Officer every six months, which covers the following key 
areas: 
(i)  status of ongoing enquiries and tax audits with local tax 

authorities;

(ii) the Group’s effective tax rate for the current year; and
(iii)  the level of provisioning for known and potential liabilities, 
including significant movements on the prior period. 

In addition, the Committee takes comfort from the work done, 
and conclusions reached, by PwC in this area. From 2020, the 
Committee will in addition directly receive an annual presentation  
on tax strategy and risk, given by the Group Head of Tax.

Given the significant investment in inventory, and being cognisant 
of the impact of commodity cycles, this remains a judgement 
for specific consideration. Reporting has been received from 
management on the business drivers behind movements in both 
gross inventory and the related slow-moving and obsolete provision. 
Specific consideration was given to a review of the accuracy of 
inventory provisioning. 
Specific consideration was given to the exceptional provisions 
recognised in relation to Minerals exit from the lower margin sand 
and aggregates market as well as the inventory impairment in Oil & 
Gas North America.

The Committee received a report from management summarising 
the detailed approach that had been taken to ensure that the 
Group’s external reporting is fair, balanced and understandable. 
This covered, but was not limited to, the following:
(i)  involvement of a cross section of management across the 

organisation during the preparation of the external reporting, 
including the Group Executive, Divisional Finance Directors, Group 
Communications, Group Finance (including Group Tax and Group 
Treasury) and Company Secretariat;

(ii)  input and advice from appropriate external advisers, including the 

Company’s brokers and public relations agency;

(iii)  use of available disclosure checklists for both corporate 

governance and financial statement reporting;

(iv)  regular research to identify emerging practice and guidance from 

relevant regulatory bodies;

(v)  regular weekly meetings (from December to February inclusive) 
involving the key contributors to the document, during which 
specific consideration was given to the fair, balanced and 
understandable assertion; and

(vi)  use of three ‘cold’ readers; two employees independent of the 
preparation process (one a member of the Senior Management 
group) and an external, independent proof reader.

100

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Area of focus

Issue

Role of the Committee

Going Concern The Committee’s role, 

as delegated by the 
Board, is to carry out 
an assessment of 
the adoption of the 
going concern basis of 
accounting and report to 
the Board accordingly.

The Committee’s role, as 
delegated by the Board, 
is to review the underlying 
processes and key 
assumptions underpinning 
the Viability Statement 
and report to the Board 
accordingly.

Viability 
Statement

We fulfilled our responsibilities in this area through the review and 
discussion of reporting received from management, which covered 
the following areas:
(i) assessment of borrowing facilities available to the Group;
(ii) review of budget and latest forecast information, including debt 
covenants;
(iii) liquidity and credit risk; and,
(iv) the existence of contingent liabilities.

We fulfilled our responsibilities in this area through the review and 
discussion of reporting received from management, which covered 
the following areas:
(i)  overview of the construct of the financial model and base case 
data underpinning the sensitivity and stress-test scenarios;

(ii)  results of financial modelling which reflected the crystallisation 
of those principal risks identified by the Board as having the 
greatest potential impact on the Group’s viability, both individually 
and when taken together in a severe but plausible stress-test 
scenario;

(iii)  extent of mitigating actions included in the financial modelling, 

relative to the population of such actions that had been identified 
as within the control of management and the Board; and
(iv)  banking covenant calculations and assessment of facility 

headroom in each of the downside and stress-test scenarios.

Conclusion

The successful 
completion of this work 
has been reported to 
the Board. The Group’s 
statement on going 
concern is included on 
page 128.

The successful 
completion of this work 
has been reported to 
the Board. The Group’s 
Viability Statement is 
reported on page 90.

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

101

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT

OUR REMUNERATION 
FRAMEWORK IS 
FOCUSED ON  
LONG-TERM VALUE 
CREATION, AND 
REWARDS EXECUTIVES 
FOR CREATING 
SUSTAINABLE  
VALUE. 

CLARE CHAPMAN
Chair of Remuneration Committee

CLARE CHAPMAN
Chair of Remuneration Committee

REMUNERATION COMMITTEE MEETING ATTENDANCE

Members
Clare Chapman (Chair)
Ebbie Haan
Mary Jo Jacobi
Barbara Jeremiah
Rick Menell
Stephen Young

25-Feb-19

05-Sep-19

16-Dec-19

–

–

–

Scheduled Scheduled Scheduled

Total
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%

DEAR SHAREHOLDER
I am pleased to introduce our Directors’ 
Remuneration Report for the year ended 
31 December 2019.

I would like to start by thanking our 
Shareholders for their resounding support for 
our Directors’ Remuneration Report at the 
2019 AGM. In recent years, Weir has received 
strong support from our Shareholders for our 
approach to pay. Our current Remuneration 
Policy was approved in 2018 with over 92% 
support. At last year’s AGM, over 93% 
of votes were in favour of our Directors’ 
Remuneration Report. In light of this strong 
endorsement, and as both the Committee and 
management are of the view that the current 
structure remains fit for purpose, we are not 
proposing to make any major changes to our 
pay arrangements this year.

The remuneration framework approved 
by Shareholders in 2018 is focused on 
long‑term value creation by significantly 
reducing award sizes, extending time horizons 
and making executives meaningful long‑term 
Shareholders, while also ensuring that we are 
able to reduce payouts if necessary to avoid 
paying for failure. The key parameters of the 

restricted share awards continue to be in line 
with best practice guidance:

•  Significantly lower award sizes – annual 
restricted share awards of 125% (CEO) 
and 100% (CFO) – these represent a 50% 
discount on the LTIP awards levels that 
were last granted in 2017.

•  Extended time horizons – for each award, 

50% is released to participants after 
five years, 25% after six years and the 
final 25% after seven years from grant. 
This represents one of the longest holding 
periods for restricted share plans in the 
UK and is in excess of the five years 
recommended in investor guidance.

•  Underpin: safeguarding against payment for 
failure – an underpin applies to the awards 
which includes a set of key metrics with 
pre‑disclosed performance thresholds.

•  Enhanced shareholding guidelines, 

including extending in post‑employment 
– the shareholding guidelines for the 
CEO and CFO are 400% and 300% of 
salary respectively. These have also been 
extended into a post‑employment period 
(at least 50% of normal level, tapering to 
0% after two years).

2019 BONUS AND LTIP OUTCOMES
Full details of our key performance indicators, 
business performance and the link to 
remuneration are set out on pages 22‑23 of 
the Annual Report.

Following consultation with Shareholders 
in 2018, and in order to better align our 
framework with the reward principles and 
delivery of our strategy, we changed the 
design of our annual incentives, with 70% 
of the bonus based on performance against 
financial measures: PBTA and working capital 
as a percentage of sales, and the remaining 
30% aligned to improvement in Weir’s 
strategic levers. This includes the improved 
percentage revenue from new solutions, 
services and products. One of the strengths 
of ‘We are Weir’ is that it takes our strategic 
framework and identifies how we will 
create value from it for all our stakeholders. 
This 30% of the annual bonus on the strategic 
measures provides a simple, transparent 
and effective way to appropriately incentivise 
shared success and build a business for the 
long‑term.

102

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

For performance delivered in 2019 the 
Committee has awarded a bonus of 58% 
and 48% of salary for the CEO and CFO 
respectively, 30% of which will be deferred 
into Weir shares for three years. Full details 
of achievement against targets are provided 
on page 119.

Shareholders. The Board members were 
in Fort Worth for our first ‘Meet the Board’ 
session at the same time employees received 
their Free Share Awards. We witnessed 
first‑hand employees’ positive reactions 
and celebrations on their first step of 
becoming Shareholders.

These bonus awards are below those of 
last year influenced by performance within 
our Oil & Gas Division given the challenging 
market conditions in North America. 
Performance against the strategic measures 
was stronger as we build the market 
differentiating capabilities as demonstrated 
by the successful award of the order to 
provide energy‑saving technology to the Iron 
Bridge magnetite project in Western Australia 
(the full scorecard is disclosed on pages  
120‑122). The Committee had the opportunity 
to apply positive discretion this year but chose 
not to on this occasion. We do, however, 
recognise management’s flawless execution 
of important portfolio changes, which includes 
the cost savings realised following the 
acquisition of ESCO and the divestment of 
Flow Control as committed.

Whilst our remuneration framework does not 
include a traditional LTIP, the final LTIP award 
was granted under our previous remuneration 
policy in 2017. The vesting period for those 
awards ended on 31 December 2019, and 
45% of the original award will vest in March 
2020. Full details are provided on page 122. 
The first tranche of restricted share awards 
will vest in 2020 and will be disclosed in our 
2020 Directors’ Remuneration Report. 

WORKFORCE REMUNERATION 
AND SHARING IN SUCCESS
Given the importance of fairness in working 
practices, the Remuneration Committee 
spends considerable time on matters relating 
to remuneration in the wider organisation. 
Details of pay trends for the wider employee 
base provide important context when 
making decisions regarding remuneration for 
Executive Directors. In 2019 we strengthened 
the link between employees and the Board 
with the appointment of our Employee 
Engagement Non‑Executive Director and 
the introduction of our ‘Meet the Board’ 
sessions, giving employees an opportunity to 
have face‑to‑face discussions with the Board. 
Further details can be found on page 85 of the 
Annual Report.

We are committed to enabling all our 
employees to actively contribute to and 
have a positive impact on the success of our 
business. This year we granted the first award 
of Free Shares under our global all employee 
share plan, Weir ShareBuilder, as part of 
our ambition of making all Weir colleagues 

To help ensure that all our employees can 
have a positive influence on our future 
success, management have also enhanced 
two‑way dialogue aimed at supporting 
organisational effectiveness. This has always 
been important at Weir given that employee 
engagement is so key to a culture of 
innovation. There is more rigour being brought 
to the process, however, and to inform 
decision‑making at the Board an Employee 
Insights Report now gives us the key themes 
coming through from employees. 

2020 DECISIONS
With effect from April 2020, the salaries 
for Executive Directors will increase by 3% 
in line with the average increase for UK 
employees. No other changes are being 
made at this time to the pay arrangements 
for Executive Directors. Whilst at the time 
the 2020 restricted share award levels were 
discussed by the Committee the share price 
movement from April 2019 restricted share 
award grant was not above threshold where 
investors typically expect companies to 
consider reducing awards, the Committee 
still considered whether any adjustments 
should be made to the 2020 award levels. 
The Committee determined that a 2020 
restricted share award of 125% of salary for 
the CEO and 100% of salary for the CFO 
remains appropriate in the context of wider 
business performance, individual performance 
and the overall remuneration package.

The Committee also reviewed the Chairman’s 
fees, and with effect from April 2020 is 
proposing an increase of 3%.

The Executive Directors receive a pension 
contribution of 12% per annum in line with 
other senior UK employees. The Committee is 
aware that a number of UK investors remain 
concerned about executive pensions which 
are significantly higher than those in the wider 
workforce. The average pension rate available 
to the UK wider workforce is c.8% of salary. 
At Weir, whilst the pension value of 12% is 
just above that of the wider workforce, it is 
very much at the lower end of market practice 
and aligns with our senior roles within the UK. 
I therefore believe that our pension practice is 
currently in line with good practice. However, 
we will review pension arrangements, 
including those for new hires, alongside the 
rest of the remuneration package as part of 
the Policy review for 2021. 

103

70% of the annual bonus is based on two 
financial measures covering profit and 
working capital. For 2020 we have decided 
to change the latter measure from working 
capital as a percentage of sales to absolute 
third‑party working capital. The proposed 
target allows for a greater focus on absolute 
cash generation and is actionable at all levels 
in the organisation. In addition, recognising 
that there may be the situation where we 
have stronger than forecast sales and need to 
invest in working capital, business units will 
have the option to apply for an exemption and 
be assessed on third‑party working capital 
as a percentage of sales as an alternative to 
ensure there is no disincentive to growth. 
Both target measures will be set in advance. 

LOOKING AHEAD
We welcome the FRC’s publication of the 
new UK Corporate Governance Code, and 
last year the Committee undertook an initial 
review of the remuneration framework to 
ensure it was appropriate in light of the 
new Code. In this year’s report we have 
provided detail as to how we comply with 
the remuneration provisions of the new UK 
Corporate Governance Code.

Under the normal three‑year renewal cycle, 
our Remuneration Policy will be presented 
to Shareholders for approval at the 2021 
AGM. During the year we will therefore be 
taking a comprehensive review of our current 
remuneration arrangements in light of our 
business goals as well as evolving market 
and best practice. 

We are keen to maintain an open and 
transparent dialogue with our investors on 
pay matters and we intend to consult with 
Shareholders regarding our proposals ahead 
of the 2021 AGM.

The Remuneration Committee has sought 
to take a simple and responsible approach 
to executive pay, with a close focus on 
the strategic priorities of the business and 
the interests of the wider stakeholders. 
We hope that this approach is clear in our 
Remuneration Report. The Committee 
appreciated the strong endorsement of last 
year’s Directors’ Remuneration Report and I 
look forward to receiving their support at the 
2020 AGM.

CLARE CHAPMAN
Chair of Remuneration Committee

26 February 2020

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

REMUNERATION AT A GLANCE

One of the strengths of ‘We are Weir’ is that it takes our strategic framework and identifies 
how we will create value from it for all our stakeholders. Our remuneration policy is aimed 
at providing a simple, transparent and effective way to appropriately incentivise shared 
success and build a business for the long‑term.

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT OF REMUNERATION 
The Committee believes it is important that, for Executive Directors and Senior Management, a significant proportion of the remuneration 
package should be aligned to the business in a way that exposes executives to upside and downside risk, and that performance conditions 
applying to incentive arrangements support the delivery of Group strategy. 

REWARD PRINCIPLES – APPROPRIATELY REWARDING THE DELIVERY OF SUSTAINABLE VALUE OVER TIME IN A 
CYCLICAL BUSINESS

EMPLOYEES AS  
SHAREHOLDERS

REWARDING LONG-TERM 
VALUE CREATION

SUPPORTING  
OUR CULTURE

Encouraging and enabling 
substantial long‑term share 
ownership for all employees.

Bringing focus to sustainable 
improvement in the 
underlying business via our 
strategic framework. 

Focusing incentives on team 
performance to create collective 
accountability and becoming an 
employer of choice by offering a 
motivating and fair package. 

SIMPLIFYING & 
INCREASING EFFECTIVENESS

Simple and transparent reward 
linked to business success and 
delivered in a way that reduces 
the impact of cyclical volatility 
on reward outcomes and 
enables retention. 

STRATEGY AND ITS LINK TO PERFORMANCE BASED PAY
In 2018 we changed our annual bonus framework to better align with our reward principles and delivery of strategy. 30% of the annual bonus 
is based on target priorities aligned to our strategic framework and the underlying headline metrics set out below. The balanced scorecard 
provides a clear line of sight on how our remuneration policy supports successful execution of our strategy and the unlocking of long‑term value. 
Further details on our performance is set out on pages 22‑23.

HOW DO WE MEASURE PROGRESS AGAINST OUR OBJECTIVES?
HOW DO WE MEASURE PROGRESS AGAINST OUR OBJECTIVES?

PEOPLE

CUSTOMER

TECHNOLOGY

PERFORMANCE

Improved sustainable 
engagement and 
organisation 
effectiveness

Increase market share

Improved percentage 
revenue from new 
solutions, services, 
products

Sustainably higher 
margins through cycle

104

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

ANNUAL BONUS OUTTURN FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 DECEMBER 2019 
Further details, including information on the performance assessment of the strategic metrics are set out on pages 120–122 in the Annual Report 
on Remuneration.

Profit before tax and 
amortisation

Working capital as a 
% of sales

Strategic measures

Total

Entry  
(20% payable)
£296m

Target 
£345m

Maximum  
(100% payable)
£394m

Payout
% of maximum
12%

Actual £302m

24.8%

22.6%

20.3%

0%

Actual 25.5%

18% 

30%

26%

Actual 26.4%

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

Jon Stanton 
Actual
£395,119

John Heasley 
Actual 
£202,736

38%

2017 LTIP OUTTURNS 
Further details are set out on page 122 in the Annual Report on Remuneration. As the awards do not vest until 29 March 2020, in accordance 
with UK regulations, the values below are calculated using the average market price for the fourth quarter of 2019, being £14.25.

Relative TSR

EPS growth p.a.

Improvement in average ROCE p.a.

Total

Threshold
(25% vesting)
Median

5%

1%

Maximum
(100% vesting)
Upper quintile

Actual 

Below Median
15%

Actual 20.4%
5%

Actual 1.6%

Percentage  
vesting

0%

33%

12%

45%

Jon Stanton 
Value 
£558,130

John Heasley 
Value
£274,769

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS’ SHAREHOLDINGS AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2019
Full details of shares owned outright and scheme interests are set out on page 124 in the Annual Report on Remuneration.

Jon Stanton

John Heasley

Notes:

1  The values of the scheme interests without performance conditions are on an estimated net‑of‑tax basis.

Current shareholding 
including scheme 
interests without 
performance 
conditions

(% of salary)1
294%

Current shareholding 
(% of salary)
190%

Shareholding 
requirement
(% of salary)
400%

157%

239%

300%

105

 
 
 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

SUMMARY OF POLICY AND 2020 IMPLEMENTATION

30% of annual bonus 
deferred into shares 
for three years.

Vesting of restricted 
share awards phased 
over five years, 
with an additional 
two-year holding 
period applying to 
each tranche. 

CORE ELEMENTS

Malus and clawback 
provisions apply 
to both the annual 
bonus and restricted 
share awards.

Shareholding 
guidelines continue 
post-employment.

Maximum pension 
provision of 12% 
per annum.

The table below summarises the key components of our remuneration framework and indicates how we intend to operate the policy in 2020. 

Operation

2020 implementation

Fixed

Salary

Pension

Fixed remuneration which 
reflects role, skills, and 
responsibilities.
For 2019:
•  CEO – £687,000
•  CFO – £423,000

Executive Directors receive 
pension contributions of 
12% per annum in line with 
other senior UK employees.

Increases for 2020 aligned to the average increase for UK employees of 3%: 
•  CEO – £708,000
•  CFO – £436,000

No change.

Benefits

Car allowance, health care 
and life assurance.

No change.

Variable Annual bonus Maximum opportunity:

•  CEO 150% of base salary
•  CFO 125% of base salary

30% deferred into shares for 
three years. Annual bonus 
awards will also be subject 
to malus and clawback 
provisions.

Measures and weightings 
in 2019:
•   50% PBTA (see 
definition on  
page 119)

•   20% Working capital as 

a percentage  
of sales

•  30% Strategic measures
•  Full retrospective 
target disclosure  
(see pages 120‑122 in 
respect of 2019) 

Measures and weightings in 2020 – working capital as a measure of sales will be 
replaced by third‑party working capital. In addition, recognising that there may be the 
situation where we have stronger than forecast sales and need to invest in working 
capital, business units will have the option to apply for an exemption and be assessed 
on third‑party working capital as a percentage of sales target as an alternative. Both 
targets will be set in advance. The weighting will remain unchanged at 20%.
Set out below are the underlying headline metrics to be achieved over the next three 
to five years, as well as the target priorities for 2020. Underlying targets will be fully 
disclosed in next year’s report.
People
Improved sustainable engagement and organisation effectiveness
•  High standards of leadership driving a best in class behavioural safety culture
•  Improve organisational effectiveness
•  Continue to extend the Weir culture and further develop the voice of 

the employee

Customer
Increase market share
•  Enhance global service capabilities
•  Increase customer focused partnerships and field trials
•  Respond to Voice of the Customer (VOC)
Technology
Improved percentage revenue from new solutions/services/products
•  Protect and extend our core through materials manufacturing and 

process advancement

•  Progress commencement of Weir Digital offering
•  Innovate products and solutions that address our customers’ biggest challenges
Performance
Sustainably higher margins through cycle
•  Improve operational performance
•  Realise benefits of Group portfolio
•  Action sustainability roadmap and deliver tangible value across the Group

106

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Operation

2020 implementation

Restricted 
share awards

Maximum award size:
•  CEO 125% of base salary
•  CFO 100% of base salary

Vesting phased over a five‑
year period, with vested 
shares released between 
five and seven years from 
grant. Vesting subject to the 
underpin. Prior to vesting, if 
any of the thresholds have 
not been met, it would 
trigger the Committee 
to consider whether a 
discretionary adjustment 
was required.
Restricted share awards will 
also be subject to malus and 
clawback provisions.

No change.
Underpin:
Balance sheet health 
•  Dividend

 –  Maintain average absolute dividend per share over the vesting period at least 

in line with the 2019 declared dividend per share.

•  Breaching covenants

 –   No breach of debt covenant or re‑negotiation of covenant terms outside of a 

normal refinancing cycle.

Investor returns
•  Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)

 –  Maintain average ROCE over the vesting period above the average Weighted 

Average Cost of Capital for that period.

Corporate governance
•  Major governance failure

 –   No material failure in governance or an illegal act resulting in significant 

reputational damage and/or material financial loss to the Group.

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

Other

Shareholding 
guidelines

NED fees

•  CEO – 400% of 

No change.

base salary

•  CFO – 300% of 
base salary 

In addition, shareholding 
requirements will continue 
post‑employment.

Fees reflect responsibilities 
and time commitments for 
the role.

Chairman and NED fees will increase by 3% in line with the wider 
employee average, effective 1 April 2020. In 2019 we also appointed an 
Employee Engagement Director to strengthen our existing employee 
engagement mechanisms.

•  Chairman’s fee – £324,000
•  NED base fee – £64,800
•  Chair of Committee fee – £16,900
•  Senior Independent Director fee – £13,600
•  Employee Engagement Director fee – £16,900

107

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY

The remuneration policy was approved by Shareholders in 2018 and is intended to apply for three years.

POLICY TABLE

BASE SALARY

Purpose
To provide a salary which takes into account an individual’s role, skills and 
responsibilities and enables the Group to attract and retain talented leaders.
Operation
Reviewed annually, with increases normally taking effect from 1 April. Salaries are 
set by reference to market practice for similar roles in companies of similar size and 
complexity. The Committee also takes into account personal performance, the wider 
employee context, and economic and labour market conditions.

Maximum value
While there is no stipulated maximum salary 
increase, increases will not normally be greater than 
the average salary increase for UK employees (or 
the relevant jurisdiction if an Executive Director is 
based outside the UK).
Different increases may be awarded at the 
Committee’s discretion in instances such as where:
•   there has been a significant increase in the size, 

complexity or value of the Group;

•  there has been a change in role or responsibility;
•  the individual is relatively new in the role and the 

salary level has been set to reflect this; and
•  the individual is positioned below relevant 

market levels.

PENSION

Purpose
To encourage long‑term saving and planning for retirement.
Operation
A contribution into the Company’s defined contribution pension plan or an equivalent 
cash allowance, or any other arrangement the Committee considers has the same 
economic benefit.

Maximum value
12% of base salary per annum in line with other 
senior UK employees.

BENEFITS

Purpose
To provide cost‑effective benefits valued by individuals. 
Operation
Benefits include, but are not limited to, health care, car allowance, liability insurance 
and death in service insurance. 
Other benefits may be provided from time to time if considered reasonable and 
appropriate, such as relocation benefits or long‑term disability insurance. 

Maximum value
•  Car allowance – no greater than £20,000 

per annum

•  Life assurance – 5 x base salary

The cost of providing insurance and health care 
benefits varies according to premium rates, so there 
is no formal maximum monetary value.

108

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

ANNUAL BONUS

Purpose
To incentivise the delivery of our strategic plan and to reward the achievement of 
stretching performance on an annual basis.
To focus incentives on team performance to create collective accountability.
Operation
Measures, targets and weightings are reviewed and determined annually at the start 
of each financial year to ensure they are appropriate and support the Company’s 
strategy.
30% of any bonus will be deferred into an award of Weir Group shares which will 
normally be released after three years. 
Malus and clawback provisions may be applied in the event of a material 
misstatement in the financial statements of the Group or a subsidiary/division, the 
discovery that information used to determine an award was materially incorrect, 
mistaken or misrepresented, gross misconduct (leading to termination for cause), 
or reputational damage causing significant damage to the Company and clearly 
attributable to the individual.

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

Maximum value
•  CEO 150% of base salary
•  CFO 125% of base salary

Performance assessment
Annual bonuses will be subject to such targets as 
the Committee considers appropriate each year. 
Financial measures will normally be used to calculate 
at least 50% of the bonus, with the remainder being 
based on strategic and/or personal objectives.
The performance targets for financial measures 
are set in the context of the internal budget taking 
into account other relevant factors such as external 
forecasts. 
All financial measures are calibrated with payment 
on a straight‑line basis between threshold (up to 
20% of maximum bonus payable) and stretch.
Payment of any strategic component will be subject 
to a discretionary underpin (including individual 
performance).
In exceptional circumstances the Committee has 
discretion to alter the measures and/or targets 
during the performance period if it believes the 
original measures and/or targets are no longer 
appropriate.
The Committee has discretion in exceptional 
circumstances to amend the payout level if it 
believes this will better reflect the Company’s 
underlying performance.

SHARE REWARD PLAN (SRP)

Purpose
To encourage and enable substantial long‑term share ownership.
To reward the delivery of sustainable value over time in a cyclical business. 
Operation
The Committee may grant awards under the SRP on an annual basis. 
Vesting of awards will be phased in four equal tranches over a five‑year period. This will 
normally be split into four equal tranches of 25% (of the total award) which vest after 
two, three, four and five years following grant. For any Executive Director appointed 
after the effective date of this Policy, 50% will vest after three years, 25% after four 
years and 25% after five years.
Vesting will be subject to continued employment and assessment of the underpin.
Following vesting, an additional two‑year holding period will also apply to each tranche, 
such that 50% of vested shares in an award are released five years from grant, 25% 
are released after six years and the final 25% is released after seven years.
Awards will normally be in the form of conditional share awards, but may be awarded 
in other forms if appropriate (e.g. as nil cost options).
Malus and clawback (applicable for three years from vesting) provisions may be 
applied in the event of:
•  a discovery of a material misstatement in the audited consolidated accounts of the 

Group or audited accounts of any Group company;

•  action or conduct which can be considered as gross misconduct;
•  events or behaviour which have a significant detrimental impact on the reputation of 
any Group company, and which can be attributed to the individual award holder; and

•  the information used to determine the number of shares over which an award is 

granted, or vests is found to be materially incorrect, mistaken or misrepresented to 
the advantage of the award holder.

Maximum value
The Committee will determine the grant level each 
year. The maximum value of award which may be 
granted in respect of a financial year is:
•  CEO 125% of base salary
•  CFO 100% of base salary

Performance assessment
No performance measures are associated with 
the awards.
The Underpin will consist of a ‘basket’ of  
pre‑determined key metrics which will best reflect 
overall business health over the vesting period. 
For each metric, a clearly defined and, where 
relevant, quantifiable ‘threshold’ will be set at 
the time of grant. Thresholds will be disclosed on 
a prospective basis.
Prior to vesting, if any of the thresholds have 
not been met, it would trigger the Committee 
to consider whether a discretionary downward 
adjustment was required.
In addition, the Committee will also have general 
discretion to reduce vesting levels if it believes this 
will better reflect the underlying performance of 
the Company over the period.

109

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY
CONTINUED

SHAREHOLDING REQUIREMENTS

Purpose
To ensure Executive Directors build and hold a significant shareholding long‑term.
To align Executive Directors’ interests with Shareholders.
Operation
Executive Directors are required to build up a shareholding in the Company over a 
five‑year period.
All beneficially owned shares, deferred shares and unvested Restricted Share awards 
count towards an individual’s shareholding (on a net of tax basis where relevant). 
Until the shareholding requirement is met an Executive Director must retain 50% of 
net Restricted Share awards, Performance Share awards, and deferred bonus award 
shares.
Shareholding requirements continue post‑employment:
•  The requirement will fall to half the normal level on leaving.
•  The requirement would then taper down to zero after two years.

ALL EMPLOYEE SHARE PLANS

Purpose
To enable long‑term share ownership for all employees, and to increase alignment 
with Shareholders.
To provide one common benefit to all employees.
Operation
Employees will be awarded Free Shares in 2019 and 2020 to the value of £300. From 
2021 onwards, only new employees will be eligible to receive Free Shares. For all 
other employees, awards of shares will be contingent on the employee purchasing 
shares with their own funds. Shares purchased using employees’ own funds will be 
matched by the Company. 
Shares will vest no later than three years after grant.
Executive Directors will be excluded from receiving any Free Shares in 2019 and 
2020, but they will be eligible to purchase and receive matching shares from 2021 
on the same terms as other employees.
In 2016, Shareholders approved a Save As You Earn scheme for all employees, 
but this plan is not currently operated.

LEGACY ARRANGEMENTS

Purpose
To honour payments and other remuneration related items due to 
Executive Directors.
Operation
The Committee reserves the right to make any remuneration payments and/or 
payments for loss of office, this includes exercising any discretions available to it in 
connection with such payments (notwithstanding that they are not in line with this 
policy) where the terms of payment:
•  came into effect before this policy was approved and implemented (including 

where such payments are in line with a previously approved policy); and

•  were agreed at a time when the individual was not a Director of the Company 

and, in the opinion of the Committee, the payment is not in consideration for the 
individual becoming a Director.

This includes the vesting of any awards granted under the LTIP.

Maximum value
shareholding guidelines
•  CEO 400% of base salary
•  CFO 300% of base salary

Maximum value
The maximum amount that can be contributed 
to purchase shares will be £200 per month. The 
maximum share match basis will be one share for 
every three shares purchased.

Maximum value
In line with existing commitments and 
arrangements.

110

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

CHAIRMAN AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS’ FEES

Purpose
To attract and retain experienced and skilled Non‑Executive Directors and to reflect 
the responsibilities and time commitment involved.
Fees are reviewed by reference to companies of similar size and complexity, 
economic and labour market conditions.
Additional fees may be made available to Non‑Executive Directors where appropriate 
to reflect any additional time commitment or duties.
The Company may reimburse Non‑Executive Directors for any business‑related costs 
(such as travel and accommodation costs incurred in connection with their duties) and 
any associated tax on these costs.

Maximum value
Fees as prescribed in the Articles of Association.
Planned increases in fees will take into account 
general increases across the Group, along with 
market practice.

DIVIDENDS
Executive Directors are entitled to receive the value of dividends payable on any deferred bonus awards under the Annual Bonus or awards 
under the SRP or LTIP up to the point of vesting. This value may be calculated assuming that the dividends were notionally reinvested in the 
Company’s shares.

COMMON AWARD TERMS
Awards granted under the share plans may be adjusted in the event of any variation of the Company’s share capital or any demerger, special 
dividend or other event that may affect the current or future value of the awards.

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

111

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY
CONTINUED

RECRUITMENT POLICY
The Committee’s approach when considering the overall remuneration arrangements in the recruitment of an Executive Director is to take 
account of all relevant factors such as the individual’s remuneration package in their prior role and the market positioning of the package against 
the local market. We will not pay more than necessary to facilitate the recruitment.

Component

Remuneration

Buy-out Awards

Other

Internal promotion to Executive Director

Policy and operation

The salary level, benefits, pension, annual bonus and annual SRP participation will be in line 
with the policy table.

The Committee will consider whether any buy‑out awards are reasonably necessary 
to facilitate the recruitment of an Executive Director, and if there any other compensation 
arrangements that would be forfeited on leaving the previous employer. 
The Committee will seek to structure any buy‑out award taking into account relevant factors 
including any performance conditions, the form in which it is to be paid and the timeframe 
of the award. 
Buy‑out awards will generally be made on a like‑for‑like basis and will be no more generous 
in quantum than the awards being forfeited.

The Committee may agree to meet certain mobility or relocation costs, including but not 
limited to, temporary living and transportation expenses. The Committee may also agree 
to meet the costs of relevant professional fees.
Reasonable expenses and associated tax incurred as part of their recruitment will be 
reimbursed to the Executive Director.

The Committee will honour existing remuneration arrangements made prior to and not 
in contemplation of promotion. The arrangements will continue to pay out in accordance with 
the respective rules and guidelines.

SERVICE CONTRACTS AND POLICY ON PAYMENT OF LOSS OF OFFICE
It is the Committee’s policy that there should be no element of reward for failure. The Committee’s approach when considering payments in the 
event of termination is to take account of the individual circumstances including the reason for termination, contractual obligations of both parties 
as well as incentive plan and pension scheme rules.

If an Executive Director’s service contract is terminated other than in accordance with its terms, the Committee will give full consideration to the 
obligation and ability of the individual to mitigate any loss they may suffer as a result of the termination of their contract.

Service contracts and letters of appointment are available for inspection at the Company’s registered office.

Provision

Unexpired term

Change of control

Notice period

Contractual payments

Policy

The unexpired term of Executive Directors’ contracts is 12 months.
Executive Directors have rolling contracts.

No provisions in service contracts relate to a change of control.
Refer to the relevant sections below for annual bonus and share plans provisions.

Current Executive Directors have 12 months’ notice by either the Company or the individual. 
This would be the normal policy for new appointments.

Termination with contractual notice or termination by way of payment in lieu of notice 
(PILON) at the Company’s discretion.
Neither notice nor PILON will be given in the event of gross misconduct.
The calculation of PILON will be at 1.2 x gross salary to reflect the value of salary and 
contractual benefits.
PILON will be made where circumstances dictate that Executive Directors’ services are not 
required for their full notice period. Contracts also allow for phased payments on termination 
which provides for mitigation, including remuneration from alternative employment.
The Committee may authorise:
•  payments for statutory entitlements in the event of termination;
•  reasonable settlement of potential legal claims; and
•  payment of reasonable reimbursement of professional fees in connection with 

such agreements.

112

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Provision

Policy

Annual bonus and deferred bonus awards

Outstanding share plan awards

All employee share plans

Relocation

Chairman and Non-Executive Directors

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

At the discretion of the Committee, a pro‑rated payment (payable in such proportions of cash 
and shares as the Committee may determine) may be earned if employment ceases during 
the year. Any payment will be subject to the assessment of bonus targets.
Dismissal for gross misconduct – all entitlements will be forfeited, including any unvested 
deferred bonus awards.
All other departure events – existing rights are normally retained in respect of any deferred 
bonus awards. Vesting will take place at the normal vesting date unless the Committee 
determines otherwise. 
Malus and clawback provisions will continue to apply.
Change in control – any bonus will normally be determined by the Committee up to the 
expected date of change in control taking into account both performance and the period of 
the financial year which has elapsed. Deferred bonus awards will vest on change in control.

The treatment of awards will be governed by the rules of the relevant plan.
Where an individual leaves as a Good Leaver (which includes for reasons of death, 
retirement, ill‑health, injury or disability, redundancy, the sale of employing company or 
business, or other circumstances that the Committee determines) unvested awards will 
normally continue and vest on the normal vesting date, taking into account the assessment 
of any applicable underpins and pro‑rated to reflect the proportion of the vesting period of 
each tranche which has elapsed. For LTIP awards, vesting would also take into account any 
applicable performance conditions over the normal performance period.
The Committee may exercise its discretion to apply a different pro rata methodology or to  
dis‑apply time pro‑rating completely.
Awards subject to a holding period will continue to be subject to that holding period as if 
employment had not ceased, except in the case of death, or in such other circumstances as 
the Committee may determine, when the holding period will end at that time.
The rules provide flexibility that in the case of the participant’s death (or such other 
exceptional circumstances as the Committee considers appropriate), tranches will vest 
(and awards in the holding period will be released) at the time of death/leaving.
If an individual leaves for any reason other than as a Good Leaver, any unvested awards will 
lapse on termination.
Leavers have a period of three months to exercise any options unless this period is extended 
by the Committee. In the event of death, an option can be exercised for a period of 12 
months by the deceased’s estate.
Awards will remain subject to the operation of malus and clawback provisions.
Change in control – the extent to which unvested awards vest will be determined by the 
Committee, taking into account the performance conditions and/or underpins as applicable 
and the proportion of the vesting period that has elapsed. Alternatively, awards may be 
exchanged for new equivalent awards in the acquiring company. The holding period applicable 
to any awards will end at the time of change in control.

The rules of any all employee share plans will apply in the event of termination of 
employment or change in control.

The Committee may determine that share plan awards or deferred bonus awards should 
vest early if an Executive Director is relocated to a country where they would suffer a tax or 
regulatory disadvantage by holding the award.

Non‑Executive Directors have letters of appointment. The letters do not contain any 
contractual entitlement to a termination payment and the Non‑Executive Directors can be 
removed in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association.
With the exception of the Chairman and Non‑Executive Directors appointed prior to 2011, 
notice periods are six months from the Company and no notice from the individual. 
There are no change in control provisions in the letters of appointment.

113

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
CONTINUED

SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND LETTERS OF APPOINTMENT
The following table sets out the dates of each of the Executive Directors’ service agreements, the dates of the Non‑Executive Directors’ letters of 
appointment and the date on which the Non‑Executive is subject to reappointment or re‑election. Directors are required to retire at each Annual 
General Meeting and seek re‑election by Shareholders.

Executive Director
Jon Stanton
John Heasley

Non-Executive Director
Charles Berry
Clare Chapman
Cal Collins
Ebbie Haan
Barbara Jeremiah
Mary Jo Jacobi
Sir Jim McDonald
Rick Menell
Stephen Young

Contract commencement date
28 July 2016
3 October 2016

Unexpired term (months)
12
12

Date of appointment
1 January 2014
1 August 2017
12 July 2018
18 February 2019
1 August 2017
1 January 2014
1 January 2015
1 April 2009
1 January 2018

Date when next subject to appointment or re-election
28 April 2020
28 April 2020
28 April 2020
28 April 2020
28 April 2020
28 April 2020
28 April 2020
–
28 April 2020

CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONS ELSEWHERE IN THE GROUP
As per our terms of reference, the Committee monitors the level of remuneration of employees below the Group Executive and is regularly 
updated on pay and conditions across the Group. When determining remuneration for the Executive Directors, the average salary increases and 
performance ranges applicable to all employees are taken into account as well as economic trends. The wider employee group was not consulted 
when setting the remuneration policy.

CONSIDERATION OF EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT
Meaningful engagement with customers and employees plays a crucial role in both innovation and the continuous improvement of the 
Weir business.

The Board recognises the importance of culture and effective employee relations to the creation of good work and good workplaces. The role of 
the Board therefore is to ensure that mechanisms are in place, and monitored, for effective employee engagement and that there is governance 
of the process for management standards and training to continue to assure ourselves of the leadership skills required to do engagement well. 
Given the multi‑national nature of our business, the management team also recognise that their approaches to insight‑gathering and dialogue 
need to reflect country practices so that engagement can be led well locally and be mindful of circumstances and culture.

As a Board, we recognise the importance of a Group‑wide framework for employee dialogue which is why our focus is to ensure that we broaden 
our Group‑wide practices for gathering workforce views and engaging in meaningful dialogue and for measuring and further strengthening 
employee engagement. Monitoring of progress will take place at the Board. 

Although we do not specifically consult employees on executive remuneration, we have in place a variety of employee voice channels, such as 
our global employee engagement survey and our ‘Meet the Board’ sessions, which provide employees with an opportunity to provide feedback 
on any topics that interest or concern them. Outputs from these channels are provided to the Board, and any remuneration concerns would be 
flagged to the Remuneration Committee for separate consideration.

CONSIDERATION OF SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Shareholders and their representative bodies played a very active role in the development of our current remuneration policy, which was put to 
vote at the AGM in 2018. The Committee remains committed to ongoing dialogue and will seek input from Shareholders when considering any 
further changes.

114

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

COMPLYING WITH UK CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE
The following table summarises how the Remuneration Policy fulfils the factors set out in provision 40 of the 2018 UK Corporate 
Governance Code.

Clarity
Remuneration arrangements should be transparent and promote 
effective engagement with Shareholders and the workforce.

Simplicity
Remuneration structures should avoid complexity and their rationale 
and operation should be easy to understand.

Risk
Remuneration arrangements should ensure reputational and other risks 
from excessive rewards, and behavioural risks that can arise from 
target‑based plans, are identified and mitigated.

Predictability
The range of possible values of rewards to individual Directors and any 
other limits or discretions should be identified and explained at the time 
of approving the policy.

Proportionality
The link between individual awards, the delivery of strategy and the 
long‑term performance of the Company should be clear. Outcomes 
should not reward poor performance.

Alignment to culture
Incentive schemes should drive behaviours consistent with Company 
purpose, values and strategy. 

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

The Committee is committed to providing open and transparent 
disclosures to Shareholders and the workforce with regards to executive 
remuneration arrangements. 
The 2019 Directors’ Remuneration Report sets out the remuneration 
arrangements for the Executive Directors in a clear and transparent way.
There is also an AGM where Shareholders can ask any questions on the 
remuneration arrangements.
Our remuneration arrangements for Executive Directors, as well as 
those throughout the organisation, are simple in nature and understood 
by all participants.
The structure for Executive Directors consists of fixed pay (salary, 
benefits, pension), annual bonus scheme and a restricted share plan.
The Committee considers that the structure of incentive arrangements 
does not encourage inappropriate risk‑taking.
Under the annual bonus, discretion may be applied where formulaic 
outcomes are not considered reflective of underlying Company 
performance. There are robust underpins in place for restricted share 
awards.
Malus and clawback provisions also apply to variable incentives.
The annual bonus scheme is the only scheme currently in operation 
for Executive Directors where there is variability in payouts depending 
on the performance of the Company. The restricted share awards 
are subject to share price movements and therefore aligned with the 
Shareholder experience.
The potential value and composition of the Executive Directors’ 
remuneration packages at below threshold, target and maximum 
scenarios are provided in the Directors’ Remuneration Report.
Payments from annual bonus require robust performance against 
challenging conditions. Performance conditions have been designed 
to link with Group strategy and consist of financial and non‑financial 
metrics.
The Committee has discretion to override formulaic outturns to ensure 
that they are appropriate and reflective of overall performance.
This year we granted the first award of Free Shares under Weir 
ShareBuilder, our global all employee share plan, as part of our ambition 
of making all Weir colleagues Shareholders.
The variable incentive schemes and performance measures and 
underpins are designed to be consistent with the Company’s purpose, 
values and strategy.

115

 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
CONTINUED

PAY AT WEIR

APPLICATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY

Jon Stanton
Illustration of Package

John Heasley
Illustration of Package

Minimum
100%
£814,026

On Target
35%
£814,026

Maximum
29%
£814,026

27%
£637,200

38%
£885,000

38%
£1,062,000

32%
£885,000

Minimum
100%
£506,355

On Target
40%
£506,355

Maximum
34%
£506,355

26%
£327,000

34%
£436,000

37%
£545,000

29%
£436,000

Fixed pay

Annual bonus

SRP

Fixed pay

Annual bonus

SRP

NOTES TO APPLICATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY CHARTS
The above charts illustrate the potential total future remuneration for the Executive Directors under our remuneration policy. The illustrations do 
not assume any share price growth, as our executive pay outcomes are not linked to performance periods of more than one financial year, or 
dividend equivalent payments on share awards.

Element of package

Fixed Pay

Annual bonus

SRP

Assumptions used

Base salary: effective 1 April 2020
Benefits: as disclosed in single total figure of remuneration
Pension: 12% cash allowance

Minimum: no bonus is earned 
On target: 60% of maximum is earned
Maximum: 100% of maximum is earned

Minimum: no vesting 
On target: 100% vesting
Maximum: 100% vesting

CEO PAY RATIO
The table below shows our CEO pay ratio at 25th, median and 75th percentile of our UK employees as at 31 December 2019. The ratios for 2019 
have been determined using Option A of the regulations. In 2018 the ratios were calculated based on the single total figure for remuneration for 
Jon Stanton and the total pay for the employees based on our gender pay gap data under Option B of the regulations. The reduction in the pay 
ratio is a result of the lower annual bonus and long‑term incentive awards for Jon Stanton compared with last year.

Financial year
2019
2018

Total pay
Base Salary

Notes

25th percentile pay ratio
56:1
75:1

Median pay ratio
44:1
66:1

75th percentile pay ratio
34:1
53:1

Jon Stanton
£1,738,491
£682,300

25th percentile
£30,977
£28,308

Median 
£39,772
£19,453

75th percentile 
£51,374
£23,158

Total pay for the percentile employees includes the following pay elements: base salary, holiday pay, annual leave adjustment, shift premium and allowance, sick pay, overtime pay, first aid 
allowance, living allowances, employer pension contribution and the provision of life assurance. No annual bonus or long‑term incentive award was payable to the employees at the percentiles.

We have pro‑rated pay for part‑time employees and new joiners accordingly to calculate full‑time equivalent total pay.

We offer competitive and fair rates of pay across the organisation, and employees are eligible to participate in our all employee share plan, Weir ShareBuilder.

116

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

GENDER PAY
For 2019, our mean gender pay gap has moved from 6% to ‑3%. Although our pay gap has moved in favour of females, we recognise that 
this is largely due to the number of males who are working in lower paid operational roles as opposed to increasing the number of females in 
management and leadership roles. We remain committed to continuing with our efforts to encourage more females to study STEM subjects and 
work in our sector. A copy of the full Gender Pay report can be found on our website www.genderpay.weir

THE REQUIREMENTS AND OUR OUTCOMES
The UK Government’s Gender Pay Gap Regulation requires legal employing entities with 250 or more employees to publish details of their 
gender pay and bonus gap. In Weir, there is one employing entity required to publish this data, but we have taken the opportunity to publish the 
consolidated data for our UK employees as this is more representative of our UK organisation. 

GENDER PAY AND EQUAL PAY
The gender pay gap is different from equal pay, which relates to men and women being paid the same for similar roles or work of equal value. 
Our pay policies are designed to ensure equal pay for equal jobs and we have processes in place to ensure pay levels are reviewed consistently.

MEAN AND MEDIAN PAY AND BONUS GAP

Gender pay gap
Gender bonus gap

PROPORTION OF MALES AND FEMALES RECEIVING A BONUS

Male
Female

PROPORTION OF MALES AND FEMALES IN EACH PAY QUARTILE BAND

Upper
Upper middle
Lower middle
Lower

Mean 
‑3%
22%

Male 
77%
82%
90%
76%

Median 
‑4%
‑25%

18%
27%

Female 
23%
18%
10%
24%

HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE AND CEO PAY
The graph below shows Weir’s TSR performance against the performance of the FTSE 350 over the nine‑year period to 31 December 2019, 
as well as the total and vested received remuneration for the CEO over the same period.

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

400

300

200

100

0

  Long‑term incentive

  Short‑term incentive

  Fixed elements

  The Weir Group Plc

  FTSE 350

£5m

£4m

£3m

£2m

£1m

0

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

117

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
CONTINUED

CHANGE IN CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REMUNERATION OVER 10 YEARS
The table below shows the total remuneration over the period 31 December 2010 to 31 December 2019, as well as outcomes under the annual 
bonus and long‑term incentive plans.

Single total figure £000
Jon Stanton
Keith Cochrane

Annual bonus 
(% of maximum)
Jon Stanton
Keith Cochrane

Long‑term incentive
(% of maximum)
Jon Stanton
Keith Cochrane

Notes

2010
–
2,913

2010
–
100%

2010
–
100%

2011
–
4,728

2011
–
100%

2011
–
100%

2012
–
3,363

2012
–
54%

2012
–
100%

2013
–
1,787

2014
–
1,456

2015
–
1,065

2016
2811
1,0122

2017
1,441
–

2018
2,4003
–

2019
1,738
–

2013
–
10%

2013
–
43%

2014
–
61%

2014
–
0%

2015
–
20%

2015
–
0%

2016
38%
40%

2016
0%
0%

2017
70%
–

2017
0%
–

2018
62%
–

2018
75%
–

2019
38%
–

2019
45%
–

1  Relates to the period Jon Stanton was CEO from 1 October 2016.

2  Relates to the period Keith Cochrane was on the Board to 30 September 2016.

3  Restated to reflect actual LTIP vesting price.

PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN CEO REMUNERATION
The table below shows the percentage change in elements of remuneration for the CEO and UK employees between 2018 and 2019. The UK 
employee population has been chosen as it reflects a broad sample of employees which includes Head Office and other individuals located in the 
same country as the CEO.

Financial year
Base salary
Taxable benefits
Bonus

CEO
% change
2.8%
‑20.6%
‑36.2%

RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF SPEND ON PAY
The table below shows the change in total staff pay between 2019 and 2018, and dividends paid out in respect of 2019 and 2018.

Financial year
Overall spend on pay for employees
Profit distributed by way of dividend

2019
£m
701.2
121.7

2018
£m
629.8
110.8

UK employees
% change
‑2.8%
85.4%
‑7.8%

Percentage
Change
11.3%
9.8%

Details of the dividends declared and paid are contained in note 10 to the Financial Statements on page 165. Details of the overall spend on pay 
for employees can be found in note 4 to the Financial Statements on page 159.

118

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

ANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION 
This section sets out how the Remuneration Policy was applied for the year ending 31 December 2019.

SINGLE TOTAL FIGURE OF REMUNERATION FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS (AUDITED) 

Base Salary
Pension 
Benefits 
Total Fixed Pay 
Annual bonus
LTIP
Total Variable Pay
Total Pay 

Jon Stanton

John Heasley

2019 (£)
682,300
81,876
21,066
785,242
395,119
558,130
953,249
1,738,491

2018 (£)
663,650
79,638
26,535
769,823
618,993
1,011,460
1,630,453
2,400,276 

2019 (£)
420,050
50,406
18,035
488,491
202,736
274,769
477,505
965,996

2018 (£)
408,400
49,008
18,206
475,614
317,432
620,206
937,638 
1,413,252 

NOTES TO THE TOTAL FIGURE OF REMUNERATION FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS (AUDITED) 

Base salary – corresponds to the amount received during the year ended 31 December 2019.

Pension – corresponds to the cash allowance provided to the Executive Directors during the year ended 31 December 2019. This equates to 12% of salary.

Benefits – corresponds to the value of benefits in respect of the year ended 31 December 2019, as follows:

Car allowance
Group healthcare
Life assurance
Total

Jon Stanton

John Heasley

2019 (£)
17,000
1,499
2,566
21,066

2019 (£)
13,970
1,499
2,566
18,035

Annual bonus – corresponds to the amount earned in respect of the year ended 31 December 2019. 30% of the value shown will be delivered 
in Weir shares which will be released after three years. Details of how the bonus outcome was calculated are set out below. 

LTIP – corresponds to the level of award resulting from targets achieved over the relevant performance period ending in respect of the financial 
year shown. As the award does not vest until 29 March 2020, in accordance with UK regulations, the vesting price is the average market price for 
the fourth quarter of 2019, being £14.25. Further details are set out on page 122. The 2018 LTIP, total variable pay and total amounts have been 
restated to reflected the LTIP vesting price on 29 April 2019.

ANNUAL BONUS PLAN (AUDITED)
Details of remuneration to be awarded to the Executive Directors as part of the 2019 annual bonus plan are set out below. The annual bonus 
plan is currently based on the achievement of financial metrics and strategic measures. This plan provides a maximum bonus opportunity for 
Jon Stanton of 150% of salary and a maximum of 125% of salary for John Heasley. 30% of any bonus earned must be deferred into shares for 
three years.

The annual bonus measures and weightings were PBTA (50%), working capital as a percentage of sales (20%) and strategic measures (30%). 

PBTA is defined as profit before tax, amortisation and exceptional items from continuing operations. The performance targets and achievements 
are calculated using January 2019 exchange rates. 

BONUS OUTCOMES (AUDITED)
The following table illustrates the performance achieved against the targets. As a result of this performance, a bonus of 38% of maximum was 
payable to the Executive Directors. Jon Stanton was awarded 58% of salary and John Heasley was awarded 48% of salary. 

Maximum Achievement

Target
60%
£345m
22.6%

100%
£394m
20.3%
Further details set out below

£302.5m
25.5%

Payout
% of
Maximum

12%
0%
26%
38%

Payout % of maximum
PBTA
Working capital as a % of sales
Strategic measures

Entry
20%
£296m
24.8%

Weighting

50%
20%
30%
100%

119

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
CONTINUED

FINANCIAL MEASURES
Our performance against our financial measures was as follows:

Profit before tax and amortisation at £302m was £43m below target. This was driven by performance within the Oil & Gas Division, who were 
£42m below target due to challenging market conditions for Pressure Pumping in North America.

Working capital as a percentage of sales at 25.5% was below entry of 24.8%, partly impacted by oil and gas market conditions.

STRATEGIC MEASURES
The strategic measures were introduced for the first time in 2018 to better align with our reward principles and delivery of our strategy. 
The strategic measures are aligned to the strategic framework (People, Customers, Technology and Performance). Each measure has an 
underlying metric to be achieved over three to five years as well as target priorities which were set for 2019. Target components are awarded 
a score of between 0% and 2.5%. The results and aggregate scores for each area are set out below.

PEOPLE
Improved sustainable engagement and organisation effectiveness

Priority for 2019
High standards of 
leadership driving 
a best in class 
behavioural safety 
programme and 
culture.

Improve 
organisational 
effectiveness.

Target
•  Reduce TIR to at least 0.61.
•  SHE Level 2 assessment in >50% of ESCO 

manufacturing sites.

Result
•  TIR 0.27. +40% underlying improvement.
•  100% of ESCO sites at level 2.
•  Increase in scoring on employee survey 

Score out 
of 7.5%
6.9%

•  Improved scoring on SHE specific questions in 

SHE questions.

employee engagement survey.

•  Implement organisational effectiveness measure 
and track against external benchmarks, with an 
improvement in measures in second half of 2019 
compared with first half.

•  Organisational effectiveness measures 

established including external benchmarking. 
Second half improvements achieved. 

•  Strategic workforce planning complete and 

•  Establish capability gap through strategic 
workforce planning with capability build in 
two key areas of the business prioritised from 
gap analysis.

•  Mobilise global HRMS programme with phase 1 

under way in line with implementation plan.

capability gaps identified, with capability build 
in two areas of the business. 

•  Global HRMS design phase completed and 
reviewed with significant progress towards 
implementation in 2020.

Continue and 
extend the Weir 
culture and develop 
the voice of the 
employee.

•  Implement priority actions from first employee 

survey. Improvement in employee survey 
participation rates and employee net promoter 
score (eNPS).

•  Work under way on priority actions and 
measures. Sector leading employee 
engagement with participation rates and 
eNPS up on previous survey.

•  Launch ‘We are Weir’ phase 2, and continuous 
listening strategy (including employee voice 
at Board).

•  Two ‘Meet the Board’ sessions held in 2019.
•  Employer brand developed.
•  Inclusion & Diversity strategy finalised 

•  Articulate and communicate Inclusion & 

and communicated.

Diversity strategy.

•  Graduate gender diversity 50% or more.

•  Graduate diversity reached 52% female 

by quarter three 2019, but dipped to 49% 
in quarter four due to reductions in Oil & 
Gas workforce.

120

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

CUSTOMER
Increase market share

Priority for 2019
Expand service 
network and 
enhance global 
capabilities.

Target
•  Strengthen Oil & Gas Eastern Hemisphere 

business with completion of Pressure Pumping 
distribution agreements.

•  Expand Minerals Service Centre footprint. 

Capture incremental Integrated Solutions input 
of £95m.

Result
•  Pressure Pumping distribution 

agreement signed.

•  Expanded service centre network into new 

and under‑represented territories.
•  £155m in additional orders from 

Integrated Solutions.

•  Consolidate ESCO and Minerals service centres 

•  12 service centre consolidations and 13 

and expand regional offering.

regional expansions.

Score out 
of 7.5%
6.8%

Increase customer 
technology and 
partnerships and 
field trial.

•  Deliver additional Oil & Gas sales/rental fleet 

•  Increase in market share with additional 

population from customer field trials. 

customers added. 

•  Installation of new Minerals Mill Circuit trials with 

•  First Terraflowing pilot purchase 

potential value >$500K. Commence flagship 
process technology pilots with customers.

order secured.

•  N70 Nemisys technology gaining 

•  Grow ESCO presence in new classes.

market share.

Enhance Voice of 
Customer (VoC) 
and its use.

•  Launch CRM surveys within Oil & Gas and test 
survey effectiveness with evidence of tangible 
VoC feedback.

•  Surveys launched for all three businesses 

with feedback being implemented. 

•  New CRM live in all regions.

•  Roll out CRM system to at least 60% of 

Minerals Division. 

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

TECHNOLOGY
Improved percentage revenue from new solutions, services, products

Priority for 2019
Protect our core 
through technology 
and material 
advancement.

Target
•  Product roadmap strategic priorities in all 

Result
•  Technology partnerships with customers 

three divisions.

across all three divisions.

•  Develop and field trial new materials for traditional 

•  New steel alloy and stainless steel alloy 

or AM applications.

developed within AM facilities.

Score out 
of 7.5%
6.4%

•  Process technology solutions development.
•  Capture business value from digital/big data.

•  First order for Terraflowing Tailings solution.
•  Commencement of field trials, with 
all new HPGRs being shipped with 
Synertrex solution.

•  Increase products developed using AM.

•  Significant progress in developing 

AM capability.

Extend beyond 
the core – disrupt 
from product to 
solutions.

Grow Advanced 
Manufacturing 
(AM) and 
Innovation 
capability.

121

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
CONTINUED

PERFORMANCE
Sustainably higher margins through cycle

Priority for 2019
Improve 
operational 
performance.

Realise benefits of 
Group portfolio.

Build sustainability 
roadmap to deliver 
tangible value 
across the Group.

Total Achievement

Target
•  Optimise current manufacturing footprint.

Result
•  Significant increase in Oil and Gas Batam 

plant utilisation.

•  Minerals OTD increased by 4%.
•  Operating improvements at ESCO’s 

Newton foundry.

•  $25m cost savings realised in 2019. 
•  Flow Control sale completed in June 2019.

•  Complete ESCO integration and first stage of 

value delivery with >$18m realised cost savings. 
Capture ESCO/Minerals revenue synergies of 
>$4m from customer facing collaboration.

•  Complete Flow Control divestment.

•  Created sustainability strategy roadmap in 

•  Sustainability strategy developed with key 

collaboration with key stakeholders and experts. 

stakeholders and approved by Board.

•  Deliver tangible and replicable cost or impact 

•  Successful completion of pilots.

reduction results from energy and waste pilots to 
justify business case for scaling across Group and 
enable robust reduction target setting in 2020.

Score out 
of 7.5%
6.3%

26.4 out of 
30%

LONG-TERM INCENTIVES VESTING IN 2019 – ACTUAL PERFORMANCE (AUDITED)
The 2017 performance share awards are due to vest on 29 March 2020. The table below sets out a summary of the performance conditions and 
performance against these conditions.

Relative TSR
EPS growth p.a.
(Base EPS 50.4p)
Improvement in average ROCE p.a.
(Base ROCE 7.6%)
Straight‑line vesting in between these points

Weighting
33%
33%

33%

Threshold
(25% vesting)
Median
5%
(58.3p)
1%
(Actual ROCE to 8.6%)

Maximum
(100% vesting)
Upper quintile
15%
(76.7p)
5%
(Actual ROCE 12.6%)

Actual
Performance
Below median
20.4%
(88p)
1.6%
(Actual ROCE 9.2%)
Total vesting:

Percentage
Vesting
0%
33%

12%

45%

The relative TSR performance was measured against the following companies: AMEC Foster Wheeler, Atlas Copco AB, Caterpillar, Dover 
Corporation, Fenner Plc, FLSmidth & Co A/S, Flowserve Corporation, Forum Energy Technologies Inc, Hunting, IMI Plc, ITT Corporation, John 
Wood Group Plc, Joy Global Inc, Komatsu, Metso Corporation, National Oilwell Varco, Outotec Oyj, Petrofac, Rotork Plc, Sandvik AB, Smiths 
Group Plc, SPX Corporation, Sulzer Ltd, TechnipFMC.

During the performance period, AMEC Foster Wheeler was acquired by John Wood Group which was already in the comparator group and the 
combined entity was used as a comparator. During 2018 Fenner was acquired by Michelin, and Atlas Copco underwent a restructure. For Atlas 
Copco, it was agreed to replace Atlas Copco with Epiroc AB as at the date of the demerger. At the time of making these changes the forecasted 
outcomes showed that the impact of the chosen treatment was small and that the performance condition was no less challenging to meet.

These are the final performance shares to vest under the LTIP as the plan was replaced with the Share Reward Plan in 2018. The first tranche of 
restricted shares under the Share Reward Plan will vest in 2020 and will be disclosed in our 2020 Directors’ Remuneration Report.

Notes

1  TSR is the increase in the net return index (the index that reflects movements in share price over a period and dividend reinvested net of any associated tax credit in shares on the ex‑dividend 

date) for a company as calculated by Datastream (or such other financial information provider as selected by the Committee) over the performance period.

2  EPS is adjusted earnings per fully paid ordinary share in the capital of the Company calculated on such basis as the Committee may specify. In addition, the EPS figure used to calculate the 

award may be adjusted for changes in accounting standards to ensure a consistent measurement basis across the performance period. Following the introduction of IFRS 16 EPS was adjusted 
to determine the vesting of the LTIP award. The EPS performance target was also adjusted to eliminate Flow Control.

3  ROCE is defined as earnings before interest and tax divided by capital employed. Earnings before interest and tax is taken as Group continuing operations after intangibles amortisation but 
before exceptional items for the relevant financial year. Capital employed is taken as the average of opening and closing Group net assets excluding net debt/cash and pension deficit (net of 
deferred tax asset) for the relevant financial year. To eliminate the impact of movements in foreign exchange rates over the period of the plan, the average foreign exchange rates for the base 
year are held constant throughout the plan period. With regard to acquisitions, those acquisitions made in the base year are included, based on a full year’s ownership for the purposes of target 
setting. Where acquisitions are made in subsequent years of the plan period, these are excluded from the assessment of performance relative to the target. Where there are disposals during 
the plan period, the base and target ROCE calculations will be restated to eliminate the contribution from the disposed business in the period of ownership. Following the introduction of IFRS 
16 ROCE was also adjusted for consistency.

122

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

SCHEME INTERESTS AWARDED DURING 2019 (AUDITED)
The following table sets out awards granted to the Executive Directors in the year ending 31 December 2019. The closing market price of the 
Company’s ordinary shares at 31 December 2019 was £15.09 and the range during the year was £12.44 to £18.14. 

Share award1
Restricted Share (Conditional)
Bonus (Deferred)
Restricted Share (Conditional)
Bonus (Deferred)

Award basis
125% salary
30% bonus
100% salary
30% bonus

Grant date
9 Apr 19
9 Apr 19
9 Apr 19
9 Apr 19

Face value of award
at maximum vesting2
£858,828
£97,650
£423,036
£49,132

No of shares
granted
50,969
5,734
25,106
2,885

Jon Stanton

John Heasley

Notes

1   There are no performance periods associated with the Restricted Share Awards or the Bonus Share Awards. Vesting of the Restricted Share Awards will be phased in four equal tranches over 

a five‑year period: 25% after two, three, four and five years following grant. An additional two‑year holding period will also apply to each tranche such that 50% of vested shares in an award are 
released five years from grant, 25% are released after six years and the final 25% is released after seven years.

2   The face value of the Restricted Share Award is based on the average of the closing price for the three days prior to the date of grant, being £16.85. The value of the Bonus Share Award is 

calculated as the share price at the date of grant, being £17.03. 

RESTRICTED SHARE AWARD UNDERPIN
Vesting of the Restricted Share Award is subject to continued employment and assessment of the underpin. Prior to vesting, if any of the 
thresholds set out below have not been met, it would trigger the Committee to consider whether a discretionary adjustment was required.

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

Balance sheet
health

Investor 
returns

Corporate 
Governance

Dividend
Maintain average absolute dividend per share over the vesting period at least in line with 2018 declared dividend  
per share.
Breaching covenants
No breach of debt covenant or renegotiation of covenant terms outside a normal refinancing cycle.

ROCE
Maintain average ROCE over the vesting period above the average Weighted Average Cost of Capital for that period.

Major governance failure
No material failure in governance or an illegal act resulting in significant reputational damage and/or material financial 
loss to the Group.

SINGLE TOTAL FIGURE OF REMUNERATION FOR CHAIRMAN AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS (AUDITED)

Charles Berry
Clare Chapman
Cal Collins
Ebbie Haan1
Mary Jo Jacobi
Barbara Jeremiah
Sir Jim McDonald
Rick Menell
Stephen Young

Notes

Basic Fee (£)

SID/EED/Committee Chair

Taxable Benefits (£) 

Total Fees (£)

2019
312,876
62,475
62,475
54,393
62,475
62,475
62,475
62,475
62,475

2018
304,375
60,775
28,795
–
60,775
60,775
60,775
60,775
60,775

2019
–
16,275
–
–
16,275
–
–
13,100
16,275

2018
–
15,800
–
–
–
–
–
12,725
10,630

2019
27
–
–
–
4,245
–
–
–
–

2018
2,209
–
–
–
1,330
–
–
–
–

2019
312,903
78,750
62,475
54,393
82,995
62,475
62,475
75,575
78,750

2018
306,584
76,575
28,795
–
62,105
60,775
60,775
73,500
71,405

1  Ebbie Haan was appointed to the Board on 18 February 2019.

123

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
CONTINUED

STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ SHAREHOLDINGS AND SHARE INTEREST (AUDITED)

Shares owned
outright

Scheme Interests

As at 31 December 2019

With 
performance
conditions
87,038

Without
performance
conditions
89,442

Vested and
exercised
In 20191
63,641

Current
shareholding
(% of salary)2
190%

42,849
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

44,046
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

59,910
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

157%
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

86,293

44,049
2,145
456
348,015
0
5,000
250
500
1,024
3,939

Shareholding
requirement
(% of salary)
400%

300%

Current 
shareholding 
including 
scheme 
interests 
without 
performance 
conditions
(% of salary)3
294%

239%
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

Jon Stanton

John Heasley
Charles Berry
Clare Chapman
Cal Collins
Ebbie Haan
Mary Jo Jacobi4
Barbara Jeremiah
Sir Jim McDonald
Rick Menell
Stephen Young

Notes

1  Vested and exercised in 2019 reflects the activity in the year.

2  Current shareholding percentage is calculated using the share price of £15.09 as at 31 December 2019.

3  The values of scheme interests without performance conditions are on an estimated net‑of‑tax basis.

4  Mary Jo Jacobi’s interest in 5,000 shares shown above is through her holding of 10,000 American Depository Receipts (ADRs). One ADR being equivalent to 0.5 ordinary shares.

EXTERNAL APPOINTMENTS
During the year Jon Stanton was a Non‑Executive Director of Imperial Brands plc. He received £54,330 in fees. John Heasley was a  
Non‑Executive Director of Royal Scottish National Orchestra Society Ltd. He received no fees.

THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE
The Remuneration Committee in 2019
There were three Committee meetings during 2019 and all Committee members attended the meetings they were eligible to attend. Although Rick 
Menell stepped down as a Committee member in June 2019 he attended the meetings in September and December at the invitation of the Chair. 

Role

Chair and members

Internal attendees

Name

Title

Clare Chapman
Ebbie Haan (from June 2019)
Mary Jo Jacobi
Rick Menell (until June 2019)
Stephen Young

Charles Berry
Jon Stanton
Rosemary McGinness
Geraldine Pamphlett
Graham Vanhegan

Independent Non‑Executive Directors

Chairman
Chief Executive Officer
Chief People Officer
Group Head of Reward and Recognition
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary to the Committee

Committee’s external adviser

Deloitte

Adviser to Committee

Internal advisers provided important information to the Committee and attended meetings. None of the individuals were involved in any decisions 
relating to their own remuneration. 

Deloitte LLP provided services to the Committee for the year ended 31 December 2019. Fees paid to Deloitte LLP for work that materially 
assisted the Committee were £80,850. Deloitte LLP also provided other services to the Weir Group in the year including tax, global employee 
services, risk advisory and financial advisory services. Deloitte is a signatory to the Remuneration Consultants’ Group Voluntary Code of Conduct 
and the Committee is satisfied that Deloitte’s advice was objective and independent.

124

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

MAIN ACTIVITIES
Over the course of the period since the last Annual Report, the Committee’s work has been focused on:

•  Annual bonus plan outturns
•  Annual bonus plan metrics and targets
•  LTIP outturns
•  Restricted Share Awards grant levels and assessment of underpins
•  Update on progress against annual bonus plan metrics
•  Projected 2017 LTIP outturns
•  Fairness and pay at Weir, including review of wider workforce trends
•  External environment – market and governance review
•  2020 salary review for Executive Directors and Group Executives
•  2020 Chairman’s fees
•  2020 annual bonus plan metrics and targets
•  Group Executive shareholdings

COMMITTEE’S PERFORMANCE
The Committee’s Terms of Reference are reviewed on an annual basis and were last updated in December 2018. A copy can be found on our 
website www.corporategovernance.weir

The Committee was evaluated as part of the 2019 Board Effectiveness Review, and it was concluded that the Committee was fulfilling its terms 
of reference effectively.

SHAREHOLDING VOTING
The table below sets out the voting by Shareholders on the resolution to approve the Directors’ Remuneration Report at the AGM held in 
April 2019. 

Remuneration Report

For
198,708,685
(93.09%)

Against
14,750,923
(6.91%)

Total Votes Cast
213,459,608
(83.23%)

Withheld
1,833,024

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
This report will be submitted to Shareholders for approval at the Annual General Meeting to be held on 28 April 2020.

CLARE CHAPMAN
Chair of the Remuneration Committee

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

125

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS’ REPORT

The Directors present their report for the year 
ending 31 December 2019.

The Directors’ Report includes the Corporate 
Governance Report from pages 72‑90, 
together with the sections of the Annual 
Report incorporated by reference.

The Company has chosen to disclose the 
following information in the Strategic Report 
on pages 2‑72:

•  Particulars of any important events, if 

any, affecting the Company which have 
occurred since the end of the financial year.
•  An indication of likely future developments 

in the business of the Company.
•  An indication of the activities of the 
Company in the field of research 
and development.

•  Details of employee policy and involvement 

(page 62).

•  Information on greenhouse gas emissions 

(pages 65‑66).

•  Principal risks and uncertainties  

(pages 54‑59).

•  In compliance with their duties under 
s.172 of the Companies Act 2006, the 
Directors have described how they have 
worked to foster the company’s business 
relationships with suppliers, customers and 
others, and the effect of that on principal 
decisions taken, in the Strategic Report 
(pages 26‑27).

The Strategic Report and the Directors’ 
Report constitute the management report 
as required under the Disclosure and 
Transparency Rule 4.1.5R.

Information to be disclosed under the Listing 
Rule 9.8.4 is set out in the table below.

Subject matter
Waiver of dividends  
(LR 9.8.4(12))

Page reference

127

Paragraphs (1), (2), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (13) and 
(14) of Listing Rule 9.8.4 are not applicable.

This Annual Report has been prepared for, and 
only for, the members of the Company, as a 
body, and no other persons. The Company, its 
Directors, employees, agents and advisers, 
do not accept or assume responsibility to 
any other person to whom this document 
is shown or into whose hands it may come, 
and any such responsibility or liability is 
expressly disclaimed. This Annual Report 
may contain statements which are not based 
on current or historical fact and/or which are 
forward‑looking in nature. Please refer to the 
cautionary statement on page 227.

COMPANY NUMBER
The Weir Group PLC is registered in Scotland 
under company number SC002934.

2020 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
The Annual General Meeting will be held on 
Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 2.30 pm.

The Notice of Meeting, along with an 
explanation of the proposed resolutions, are 
set out in a separate circular to Shareholders 
which accompanies this Annual Report and 
can be downloaded from the Company’s 
website. The Company conducts the vote 
at the AGM by poll and the result of the 
votes, including proxies, is published on the 
Company’s website after the meeting.

DIVIDEND
The Directors have recommended a final 
dividend of 30.45p per share for the period 
ended 31 December 2019. Payment of this 
dividend is subject to shareholder approval at 
the 2020 AGM.

SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDERS
The Company has been notified in accordance 
with the Financial Conduct Authority’s 
Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules 
(DTR 5) that the following held, or were 
beneficially interested in, 3% or more of the 
voting rights of the Company’s issued share 
capital as at 31 December 2019:

Shareholder
BlackRock, Inc.
Maverick Capital, 
Ltd
Black Creek 
Investment 
Management Inc.

Number of 
voting rights
 16,367,278

Number of 
voting rights
6.30%

 13,093,815

5.04% 

8,161,884

3.14% 

Between 31 December 2019 and 26 February 2020, the 
Company was notified of the following changes to the 
table above.

TR‑1 received from Maverick Capital, Ltd. on 8 January 2020. 
Number of voting rights 12,810,895. Percentage of voting 
rights 4.93%.

TR‑1 received from BlackRock Inc. on 21 January 2020. 
Number of voting rights 16,557,031. Percentage of voting 
rights 6.37%.

TR‑1 received from BlackRock Inc. on 27 January 2020. 
Number of voting rights 16,542,978. Percentage of voting 
rights 6.37%.

TR‑1 received from BlackRock Inc. on 13 February 2020. 
Number of voting rights 15,426,147. Percentage of voting 
rights 5.94%.

TR‑1 received from BlackRock, Inc. on 18 February 2020. 
Number of voting rights 15,440,238. Percentage of voting 
rights 5.94%.

TR‑1 received from BlackRock, Inc. on 20 February 2020. 
Number of voting rights 15,455,846. Percentage of voting 
rights 5.95%.

TR‑1 received from Black Creek Investment Management 
Inc. on 20 February 2020. Number of voting rights 10,438,047. 
Percentage of voting rights 4.02%. 

TR‑1 received from BlackRock, Inc. on 21 February 2020. 
Number of voting rights 15,469,979. Percentage of voting 
rights 5.95%. 

EMPLOYMENT POLICY AND 
INVOLVEMENT
The average number of employees in the 
Group during the period is given in note 4 to 
the Group financial statements on page 159.

Group companies operate within a framework 
of HR policies, practices and regulations 
appropriate to their market sector and country 
of operation. Policies and procedures for 
recruitment, training and career development 
promote equality of opportunity regardless 
of gender, sexual orientation, age, marital 
status, disability, race, religion or other beliefs 
and ethnic or national origin. At Weir, we 
strive to build an inclusive culture in which all 
employees have the opportunity to succeed 
and to be able to do the best work of their 
lives. The Group remains committed to the 
fair treatment of people with disabilities 
regarding recruitment, training, promotion 
and career development. Meaningful dialogue 
with our employees is actively encouraged. 
Further details are included on pages 26‑27.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 
The information required in respect of 
financial instruments as required by 
Schedule 7 of The Large‑ and Medium‑sized 
Companies and Groups (Accounts and 
Reports) Regulations 2008 is given in note 29 
to the Group financial statements on pages 
190‑196.

SHARE CAPITAL AND RIGHTS 
ATTACHING TO THE COMPANY’S 
SHARES
Details of the issued share capital of the 
Company, which comprises a single class of 
ordinary shares of 12.5p each are set out in 
note 24 to the Group financial statements 
on page 184. The rights attaching to the 
shares are set out in the Company’s Articles 
of Association. There are no special control 
rights in relation to the Company’s shares and 
the Company is not aware of any agreements 
between Shareholders that may result in 
restrictions on the transfer of securities  
and/or voting rights.

During the period, no ordinary shares 
were issued.

The Group has a nominee arrangement with 
Computershare Investor Services PLC (the 
‘Computershare Nominee’) and an employee 
benefit trust with Estera Trust (Jersey) Limited 
(the ‘Estera EBT’). 

During the period, the Estera EBT purchased 
652,000 shares in the market at an aggregate 
value of £10,030,661.59, on behalf of the 

126

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Company for satisfaction of any future vesting 
of the awards granted under the LTIP, the SRP 
and the ESCO Plan.

On 19 December 2019, 141,105 shares held 
in the Estera EBT were transferred to the 
Computershare Nominee. 

During the period, the Long Term Incentive 
Plan (the ‘LTIP’) vested and the trustees 
of the Estera EBT transferred 619,180 
ordinary shares to employees to satisfy the 
LTIP awards.

During the period, the Share Reward Plan (the 
‘SRP’) vested and the trustees of the Estera 
EBT transferred 147, 845 ordinary shares to 
employees to satisfy the SRP rewards.

During the period, the ESCO Stock Incentive 
Plan 2010 (the ‘ESCO Plan’) vested and the 
trustees of the Estera EBT transferred 86,035 
ordinary shares to employees to satisfy the 
ESCO awards.

Both the Estera EBT and Computershare 
Nominee agreed to waive any right to all 
dividend payments on shares held by them 
with the exception of shares held in respect 
of awards which have a dividend entitlement.

Details of the shares held by the 
Computershare Nominee and Estera EBT 
are set out in note 24 to the Group Financial 
Statements on page 184.

The 141,105 shares held in the 
Computershare Nominee are the shares 
in respect of which dividends have not 
been waived.

The Estera EBT held, through nominee 
account CGWL Nominees Ltd, 0.01% of the 
issued share capital of the Company as at 
31 December 2019. This is held in trust on 
behalf of the Company for satisfaction of any 
future vesting of the awards granted under 
the LTIP, the SRP and the ESCO Plan.

The Computershare Nominee held 0.05% 
of the issued share capital of the Company 
as at 31 December 2019.This is held in trust 
for the benefit of certain senior executives of 
the Group. 

With the exception of the shares held for the 
benefit of certain senior executives, the voting 
rights in relation to these shares are exercised 
by the trustees. The Estera EBT may vote or 
abstain from voting with the shares or accept 
or reject any offer relating to shares, in any 
way they see fit, without incurring any liability 
and without being required to give reasons for 
their decision.

REPURCHASE OF SHARES
At the 2019 Annual General Meeting, 
Shareholders renewed the Company’s 
authority to make market purchases of up 
to 25.9m ordinary shares (representing 
approximately 10% of the issued share capital 
excluding treasury shares). No shares were 
purchased under this authority during the year 
ended 31 December 2019. At the forthcoming 
Annual General Meeting, the Board will again 
seek shareholder approval to renew the 
annual authority for the Company to make 
market purchases at the same level.

VOTING RIGHTS
The Company’s Articles of Association provide 
that on a show of hands at a general meeting 
of the Company, every holder of ordinary 
shares present in person and by proxy and 
entitled to vote shall have one vote and on a 
poll, every member present in person or by 
proxy and entitled to vote shall have one vote 
for every ordinary share held.

The Notice of the AGM specifies deadlines for 
exercising voting rights and appointing a proxy 
or proxies to vote in relation to resolutions 
to be passed at the AGM. The Company 
conducts the vote at the AGM by poll and 
the result of the poll will be released to the 
London Stock Exchange and posted on the 
Company’s website as soon as practicable 
after the meeting.

The Articles of Association may only be 
amended by a special resolution passed at a 
general meeting of Shareholders.

TRANSFER OF SHARES
There are no restrictions on the transfer of 
ordinary shares in the Company, other than as 
contained in the Articles of Association:

•  The Directors may refuse to register any 
transfer of any certificated share which is 
not fully paid up, provided that this power 
will not be exercised so as to disturb the 
market in the Company’s shares.

•  The Directors may also refuse to register 

the transfer of a certificated share unless it 
is delivered to the Registrar’s office, or such 
other place as the Directors have specified, 
accompanied by a certificate for the shares 
to be transferred and such other evidence 
as the Directors may reasonably require to 
prove title of the intending transferor.

Certain restrictions may from time to time 
be imposed by laws and regulations, for 
example, insider trading laws, in relation to 
the transfer of shares.

127

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

APPOINTMENT AND REPLACEMENT 
OF DIRECTORS
The provisions about the appointment and 
re‑election of Directors of the Company are 
contained in the Articles of Association.

POWERS OF DIRECTORS
The business of the Company is managed 
by the Directors who may exercise all the 
powers of the Company, subject to the 
provisions of the Company’s Articles of 
Association, any special resolution of the 
Company and any relevant legislation.

DIRECTORS’ INDEMNITIES
The Company has granted indemnities 
to each of its Directors in respect of all 
losses arising out of or in connection with 
the execution of their powers, duties and 
responsibilities as Directors to the extent 
permitted by the Companies Act 2006 and the 
Company’s Articles of Association. In addition, 
Directors and Officers of the Company and 
its subsidiaries and trustees of its pension 
schemes are covered by Directors’ and 
Officers’ liability insurance.

PENSION SCHEME INDEMNITIES
The Group operates two closed defined 
benefit pension schemes in the UK which 
provide retirement and death benefits for 
employees and former employees of the 
Group. The corporate trustees of the pension 
schemes are The Weir Group Pension Trust 
Limited, a subsidiary of The Weir Group 
PLC, and The Weir Group Senior Executives 
Pension Trust Limited. Qualifying pension 
scheme indemnity provisions, as defined 
in section 235 of the Companies Act 2006, 
were in force for the financial year ended 
31 December 2019 and remain in force 
for the benefit of each of the Directors 
of the corporate trustees of the pension 
schemes. These indemnity provisions cover, 
to the extent permitted by law, certain 
losses or liabilities incurred as a Director 
or officer of the corporate trustees of the 
pension schemes.

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS’ REPORT
CONTINUED

CONFIRMATIONS
So far as each of the Directors is aware, there 
is no relevant audit information (as defined by 
section 481 of the Companies Act 2006) of 
which the Company’s auditors are unaware.

Each of the Directors has taken all of the 
steps that he or she ought to have taken as 
a Director to make themselves aware of any 
relevant audit information and to establish 
that the Company’s auditors are aware of 
that information.

GOING CONCERN
The Directors have a reasonable expectation 
that the Group has adequate resources 
to continue to operate for the foreseeable 
future. For this reason, they continue to adopt 
the going concern basis in preparing the 
financial statements. In forming this view, the 
Directors have reviewed the Group’s budgets, 
plans and cash flow forecasts, including 
market downturn sensitivities. In addition, 
the Directors have considered the potential 
impact of credit risk and liquidity risk detailed 
in note 29 to the Group financial statements 
on pages 190‑196. Each of these items has 
been considered in relation to the Group’s 
banking facilities described in note 19 on 
pages 174‑175.

The Directors’ Report has been approved by 
the Board of Directors in accordance with the 
Companies Act 2006.

On behalf of the Board of Directors

GRAHAM VANHEGAN
Chief Legal Officer and 
Company Secretary

26 February 2020

CHANGE OF CONTROL – 
SIGNIFICANT AGREEMENTS
The following significant agreements contain 
provisions entitling the counterparties to 
require prior approval, exercise termination, 
alteration or similar rights in the event of a 
change of control of the Company. The Group 
has in place a US$950m multi‑currency 
revolving credit facility (the ‘Facility’) with 
a syndicate of 12 banks due to mature in 
September 2021 and a GBP 300m Term Loan 
from four banks due to mature in December 
2020. Under the terms of these Facilities, if 
there is a change of control of the Company, 
the Company has 30 days from the date 
of the change of control to agree terms for 
continuing the Facility. 

If at the end of the 30 days no agreement 
is reached between the Company and the 
banks, then any lender may request, by not 
less than 30 days’ notice to the Company, 
that its commitment be cancelled and all 
outstanding amounts be repaid to that lender 
at the expiry of such notice period. 

The Company has in issue fixed rate private 
placement notes with a range of maturities: 
US$590m at an interest rate of 4.27% due 
on 16 February 2022 and US$200m at an 
interest rate of 4.34% due on 16 February 
2023. Under the terms of the applicable note 
purchase agreements, if there is a change 
of control of the Company, the notes must 
be offered for prepayment by the Company 
within seven days of the change of control.

There are no agreements between the 
Company and its Directors or employees 
providing for compensation for loss of office 
or employment (whether through resignation, 
purported redundancy or otherwise) that 
occurs because of a takeover bid.

128

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES

The Directors consider that the Annual 
Report and Financial Statements, taken as a 
whole, are fair, balanced and understandable 
and provide the information necessary 
for Shareholders to assess the Group’s 
performance, business model and strategy.

Each of the Directors, as at the date of 
this report, confirms to the best of their 
knowledge that:

•  The financial statements, prepared in 
accordance with the applicable set of 
accounting standards, give a true and fair 
view of the assets, liabilities, financial 
position and profit of the Group.

•  The Strategic Report and the Directors’ 

Report include a fair review of the 
development and performance of the 
business and the position of the Group, 
together with a description of the principal 
risks and uncertainties that it faces.

On behalf of the Board of Directors

JON STANTON
Chief Executive Officer

26 February 2020

JOHN HEASLEY
Chief Financial Officer

26 February 2020

The Directors are responsible for preparing 
the Annual Report and the Financial 
Statements in accordance with applicable law 
and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to 
prepare financial statements for each financial 
year. Under that law, the Directors have 
prepared the Group financial statements 
in accordance with International Financial 
Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the 
European Union and the Company financial 
statements in accordance with UK Accounting 
Standards and applicable law.

In preparing those financial statements, the 
Directors are required to:

•  Select suitable accounting policies and then 

apply them consistently.

•  Make judgements and estimates that are 

reasonable and prudent.

•  State that the Group financial statements 

have complied with IFRS as adopted by the 
European Union, subject to any material 
departures being disclosed and explained.
•  State for the Company financial statements 

whether the applicable UK Accounting 
Standards have been followed, subject to 
any material departures being disclosed 
and explained.

The Directors are responsible for keeping 
proper accounting records which disclose 
with reasonable accuracy at any time the 
financial position of the Group and enable 
them to ensure that the Group financial 
statements comply with the 2006 Act and 
Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. They are also 
responsible for safeguarding the assets of the 
Group and hence for taking reasonable steps 
for the prevention and detection of fraud and 
other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for the 
maintenance and integrity of the Company’s 
website. Legislation in the United Kingdom 
governing the preparation and dissemination 
of accounts may differ from legislation in 
other jurisdictions.

129

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE  
MEMBERS OF THE WEIR GROUP PLC

Report on the audit of the financial 
statements
Opinion
In our opinion:

•  The Weir Group PLC’s Group financial 
statements and Company financial 
statements (the ‘financial statements’) 
give a true and fair view of the state of the 
Group’s and of the Company’s affairs as at 
31 December 2019 and of the Group’s loss 
and cash flows for the year then ended;

•  the Group financial statements have been 
properly prepared in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards 
(IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union;

•  the Company financial statements have 
been properly prepared in accordance 
with United Kingdom Generally Accepted 
Accounting Practice (United Kingdom 
Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 
101 ‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’, and 
applicable law); and

•  the financial statements have been 
prepared in accordance with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 
2006 and, as regards the Group financial 
statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.

We have audited the financial statements, 
included within the Annual Report and 
Financial Statements (the ‘Annual Report’), 
which comprise: the Consolidated 
and Company Balance Sheets as at 
31 December 2019; the Consolidated Income 
Statement and Consolidated Statement of 
Comprehensive Income, the Consolidated 
Cash Flow Statement, and the Consolidated 
and Company Statement of Changes in 
Equity for the year then ended; and the 
notes to the financial statements, which 
include a description of the significant 
accounting policies.

Overview

Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to 
the Audit Committee.

Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with 
International Standards on Auditing (UK) (‘ISAs 
(UK)’) and applicable law. Our responsibilities 
under ISAs (UK) are further described in the 
Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the 
financial statements section of our report. 
We believe that the audit evidence we have 
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to 
provide a basis for our opinion.

Independence
We remained independent of the Group in 
accordance with the ethical requirements 
that are relevant to our audit of the financial 
statements in the UK, which includes the 
FRC’s Ethical Standard, as applicable to listed 
public interest entities, and we have fulfilled 
our other ethical responsibilities in accordance 
with these requirements.

To the best of our knowledge and belief, we 
declare that non-audit services prohibited by 
the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided 
to the Group or the Company.

Other than those disclosed in note 4 to the 
financial statements, we have provided 
no non-audit services to the Group or the 
Company in the period from 1 January 2019 
to 31 December 2019.

Our audit approach
Context
The Group is organised into three continuing 
operating divisions: Minerals, Oil & Gas and 
ESCO. During the year the Group completed 
the sale of its Flow Control Division which 
was accounted for as a discontinued 
operation. Each division conducts its business 
in a number of locations around the world. 
Many of the businesses are of similar size, 
so we scoped our audit to ensure we had 

appropriate coverage of the Group covering 
all divisions. We included components which 
accounted for the largest share of the Group’s 
results or where we considered there to be 
areas of significant risk. We also considered 
the markets in which the Group operates 
when we performed our assessment of 
scope and areas of significant risk. 

The scope of our audit
As part of designing our audit, we determined 
materiality and assessed the risks of material 
misstatement in the financial statements. 

Capability of the audit in detecting 
irregularities, including fraud
Based on our understanding of the Group, 
we identified that the principal risks of 
non-compliance with laws and regulations 
related to the wide variety of jurisdictions in 
which the Group operates and we considered 
the extent to which non-compliance might 
have a material effect on the financial 
statements. We also considered those 
laws and regulations that have a direct 
impact on the preparation of the financial 
statements such as the Companies 
Act 2006. We evaluated management’s 
incentives and opportunities for fraudulent 
manipulation of the financial statements 
(including the risk of override of controls), 
and determined that the principal risks were 
related to posting inappropriate journal entries 
to increase revenue or profit. The Group 
audit engagement team shared this risk 
assessment with the component auditors 
so that they could include appropriate audit 
procedures in response to such risks in their 
work. Audit procedures performed by the 
group engagement team and/or component 
auditors included:

Materiality

Audit scope

Key audit 
matters

•  Overall Group materiality: £15m (2018: £15.5m), based on 5% of profit before exceptional items, amortisation 

and tax for continuing operations.

•  Overall Company materiality: £1.5m (2018: £1.5m), which is based on an allocation of Group materiality.

•  We conducted audit work on 16 components in nine countries. We conducted full scope audits on nine of these 

components and the audit of specified balances and classes of transactions for the remaining components.
•  The Group audit engagement team visited the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom, covering five 
components. In addition, members of the Group engagement team performed the audit of four components 
based in the UK.

•  The 16 components where we performed audit work accounted for 79% of Group revenue and 73% of profit 

before exceptional items, intangibles amortisation and tax from continuing operations.

•  Carrying value of goodwill and intangibles (O&G North America and International components).
•  Accounting for asbestos-related claims.
•  Accounting for exceptional items.
•  Uncertain tax positions.

130

 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

•  Discussions with management, internal 

audit and Group General Counsel, including 
consideration of known or suspected 
instances of non-compliance with laws and 
regulations and fraud or matters reported 
on the Group’s whistleblowing helpline;

•  Evaluation of management’s 

controls designed to prevent and 
detect irregularities;

•  Review of Board minutes;
•  Challenging assumptions and judgements 
made by management in its significant 
accounting estimates, in particular in 
relation to the classification of costs 
as exceptional;

•  Identifying and testing journal entries, 
in particular any journal entries posted 
by Senior Management, postings to 
exceptional items, unusual account 
combinations and round sum accruals 
or provisions.

There are inherent limitations in the audit 
procedures described above and the 
further removed non-compliance with 
laws and regulations is from the events 
and transactions reflected in the financial 
statements, the less likely we would become 
aware of it. Also, the risk of not detecting 
a material misstatement due to fraud is 
higher than the risk of not detecting one 
resulting from error, as fraud may involve 
deliberate concealment by, for example, 
forgery or intentional misrepresentations, 
or through collusion.

Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, 
in the auditors’ professional judgement, 
were of most significance in the audit of the 
financial statements of the current period 
and include the most significant assessed 
risks of material misstatement (whether or 

not due to fraud) identified by the auditors, 
including those which had the greatest 
effect on: the overall audit strategy; the 
allocation of resources in the audit; and 
directing the efforts of the engagement team. 
These matters, and any comments we make 
on the results of our procedures thereon, 
were addressed in the context of our audit of 
the financial statements as a whole, and in 
forming our opinion thereon, and we do not 
provide a separate opinion on these matters. 
This is not a complete list of all risks identified 
by our audit. 

Key audit matter

How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Valuation of goodwill and intangibles – Oil & Gas North America 
and International CGUs
Refer to page 99 (Audit Committee Report), page 150 Accounting 
Policies and page 170 (note 14).

Weir’s North America Oil & Gas CGU primarily provides equipment 
and aftermarket service solutions to the onshore oil and gas industry 
in shale fields.

During the second half of 2019, management identified indicators of 
impairment to the Oil & Gas North America CGU’s assets as a result 
of a deterioration in market conditions impacting trading performance 
and a poor industry outlook.

Given current challenging market conditions and uncertainty around 
the timing of market recovery, an impairment of £258.2m was made 
to specific assets including inventory, customer relationships and 
brand intangibles. An impairment review was subsequently performed 
on the goodwill and remaining asset base. Based on management’s 
estimate, an impairment of £288.0m was recorded against the 
Oil & Gas North America goodwill.

Management also performed an impairment review of the Oil & Gas 
International CGU and no impairment was identified. 

The Group also incurred redundancy and other restructuring charges 
which are discussed under ‘Accounting for exceptional items’ below.

Group 
We have performed procedures to test the impairment of individual 
assets within the CGUs. We have understood the nature of the individual 
impairments and have traced a sample to supporting documentation to 
validate that assets have been appropriately written off in the year.

We have reviewed management’s estimate of the value in use of the 
CGUs by:

•  assessing the integrity and mathematical accuracy of 

management’s models;

•  involving PwC Valuation experts to assist in evaluating the 

reasonableness of the key assumptions used by management, 
including the discount rate, short term cash flow projections and 
long-term growth rate through comparison to independent third-
party sources; 

•  performing sensitivity analysis to stress test the models to determine 
the degree to which a change in assumptions would impact the value 
of the impairment recognised; and

•  considering third-party sources of industry outlook to compare with 
management’s views, considering whether any contrary views 
are appropriate.

We considered the assumptions used by management to be appropriate 
in arriving at a reliable estimate of the each CGU’s carrying value.

We have assessed the disclosures in the financial statements to be 
compliant with the requirements of IAS 1 ‘Presentation of Financial 
Statements’ and IAS 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’.

As set out in note 14 on page 171, we agree with management that the 
adverse change in assumptions used to determine the carrying value 
of the Oil & Gas North America CGU would, in isolation, cause further 
impairment losses to be recognised.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

131

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE  
MEMBERS OF THE WEIR GROUP PLC
CONTINUED

Key audit matter

How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Accounting for asbestos-related claims
Refer to page 99 (Audit Committee Report), page 147 Accounting 
Policies and page 177 (note 21).

Provision has been made as at 31 December 2019 for future asbestos 
related claims of £47.6m (2018: £52.3m). This consists of a provision 
of £44.4m (2018: £48.1m) for the Group’s liabilities arising from 
asbestos related damages claims in the US and £3.2m in the UK 
(2018: £4.2m).

The valuation of the liability involves significant estimation. In arriving 
at the estimate of the liability, management is required to make 
assumptions which include the number and value of claims and the 
time period over which the liability can be reliably measured.

As a result there is a high degree of uncertainty in this estimate.

The Group has insurance cover in place to mostly offset the US 
provision (£43.4m included in other receivables between non-current 
and current assets – note 17, page 173). Provision for the estimated 
uninsured liability of £1.0m (2018:£nil) has been made. This was also 
considered in our work.

Group 
We have performed procedures on both the UK and US asbestos 
liabilities. The US provision is the more significant and has a greater level 
of estimation uncertainty. 

Management obtains a triennial actuarial estimate of the asbestos 
liability from an independent expert with the latest being received 
in 2017. We involved our PwC actuarial experts to assess the 
reasonableness of the methodology used by the independent expert. 
We confirmed that the same methodology was appropriately applied 
in 2019. Management assessed the claims received and those settled 
in the year and compared them with the actuarial estimate in order to 
calculate the provision required at 31 December 2019. 

We evaluated management’s underlying assumptions used in its 
calculation. This included testing of:

•  the mathematical accuracy of the underlying calculations in 

management’s model;

•  the input data to management’s model, such as the average cost 

per claim and the number of settled claims to source data, which we 
verified directly with the Group’s external lawyers; and

•  the reasonableness of forecast number and value of claims to be 
settled to data provided by the Group’s external actuarial experts. 
We evaluated the appropriateness of management’s assessment of 
the timescale over which a liability can be reliably measured, which 
remains at 10 years.

We also examined the insurance cover held by the Group and modelled 
the likelihood of the cover in place being sufficient to cover the period 
and amount of the estimated liabilities. We observed that the main 
insurance policy remained active and was settling claims as expected. 
We tested the reasonableness of the provision made for the estimated 
uninsured liability. 

Finally, we tested the disclosures in the financial statements and 
checked for compliance with IAS 37 ‘Provisions, Contingent Liabilities 
and Contingent Liabilities’ and IAS 1 ‘Presentation of Financial 
Statements’ and considered them to be appropriate.

We considered the assumptions used by management to be appropriate 
in arriving at a reliable estimate of the provision. We also assessed the 
recognition of an offsetting insurance asset in the financial statements 
and considered it to be appropriate. 

132

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Key audit matter

How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Accounting for exceptional items
Refer to page 98 (Audit Committee Report), page 146 Accounting 
Policies and page 160 (note 5).

The Group incurred £596m (2018: £157.7m) of exceptional charges 
in the period for continuing operations and £22.1m for discontinued 
operations (2018: £51.6m).

The accurate presentation of costs and income as exceptional items 
was considered an area of focus for all reporting units. This was 
to assess the consistency and accuracy of the Group’s operating 
profit as reported to shareholders and the application of the Group’s 
accounting policy.

The North America Oil & Gas restructuring and Trio North America 
Sand and Aggregates business closure were non-recurring, material 
items which were significant in nature and therefore required a higher 
level of focus. 

Valuation of uncertain tax provisions
Refer to page 100 (Audit Committee Report), page 153 Accounting 
Policies and page 161 (note 7).

The Group operates in multiple tax jurisdictions and has a number of 
ongoing discussions and investigations with tax authorities where 
uncertain tax provisions and treatments may be challenged. There is 
judgement in assessing the level of provisions required to cover the 
risk of successful challenge over certain of the Group’s tax provisions.

Group 
The exceptional charge relating to impairment of the Oil & Gas North 
America CGU (£288.0m) has been addressed in the Valuation of goodwill 
and intangibles key audit matter above. 

We obtained a listing of the exceptional costs and income 
incurred by both component and category and tested a sample to 
supporting documentation.

We checked the nature of the costs and income to assess whether they 
were treated appropriately and consistently as exceptional items within 
the income statement. We assessed the disclosures in the Annual 
Report relating to exceptional items.

We considered whether there were other significant costs or income 
which should have been included in exceptional items using our 
knowledge of the business. 

We also verified that provisions made in prior years were appropriately 
utilised during the year.

We assessed the classification of items as exceptional for compliance 
with the Group’s disclosed accounting policy. 

From the audit work performed, we consider that the exceptional 
items were appropriately recorded in compliance with the Group’s 
accounting policy.

Group 
We have used our internal tax specialists to read the Group’s 
documentation of uncertain tax provisions and tested the more 
significant provisions for appropriateness by: 

•  confirming the basis of provision;
•  understanding the movements on the provision during the year;
•  reading correspondence with relevant tax authorities in the 

assessment of management’s calculation; and 

•  applying our knowledge of international tax legislation and practice.

In addition, we assessed the adequacy and appropriateness of the 
disclosure of tax provisions for compliance with IAS 12 ‘Income Taxes’.

This is an area which requires significant management judgement and 
has a range of possible outcomes. However, the evidence we obtained, 
including our testing of assumptions, was materially consistent with the 
overall level of provisioning in respect of tax.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

133

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE  
MEMBERS OF THE WEIR GROUP PLC
CONTINUED

How we tailored the audit scope
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements as a 
whole, taking into account the structure of the Group and the Company, the accounting processes and controls, and the industries in which 
they operate.

The Group is organised into three continuing operating divisions: Minerals, Oil & Gas and ESCO; the latter was acquired on 12 July 2018. 
The Flow Control Division was sold on 28 June 2019 and is therefore disclosed as a discontinued operation in comparatives. Each division 
conducts its business in a number of locations around the world. Many of the businesses are of similar size, so we scoped our audit to ensure 
we had appropriate coverage of the Group covering all divisions. We included components which accounted for the largest share of the Group’s 
results or where we considered there to be areas of significant risk. We also considered the markets in which the Group operates when we 
performed our assessment of scope and areas of significant risk. 

The Group’s components vary significantly in size and we identified nine components that, in our view, required an audit of their complete 
financial information due to their relative size or risk characteristics. Of these full scope component audits, four were based in the UK and 
were performed by members of the group engagement team. These covered trading components, central functions and Head Office managed 
balances including treasury, uncertain tax provisions, post-retirement benefits, goodwill and intangibles.

The remaining five full scope component audits were performed by other PwC network firms. Other PwC network firms also performed 
specific scope audits over a further seven components which covered all line items on the income statement and specified line items on the 
balance sheet.

The scope of work at each component was determined by its contribution to the Group’s overall financial performance or balance sheet and its 
risk profile. Where component audits were performed by teams from other PwC network firms, members of the group engagement team were 
involved in their work throughout the audit. We maintained regular communication and conducted formal interim and year end conference calls 
with all full and specific scope component teams. The discussions during the audit also included divisional management.

Of the 16 components in scope, we deemed two to be financially significant to the Group and these were both visited in North America 
and Australia in the current year. The group engagement partners also visited two other components in North America and one in the 
United Kingdom. 

Together these full and specific scope component audits gave appropriate coverage of all material balances at a Group level. On a consolidated 
basis, these provided coverage of 79% of revenue and 73% of profit before exceptional items, intangibles amortisation and tax.

Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These, together 
with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures on the 
individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate on the 
financial statements as a whole. 

Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:

Group financial statements

Company financial statements

Overall materiality

£15.0m (2018: £15.5m).

£1.5m (2018: £1.5m).

How we determined it

5% of profit before exceptional items, amortisation  
and tax for continuing operations.

An allocation of Group materiality.

Rationale for benchmark applied

It is clear from the Annual Report that this profit 
measure is used by shareholders in evaluating the 
underlying business performance. We applied a lower 
materiality to the audit of exceptional items and 
intangibles amortisation.

The allocation of Group materiality was 
determined based on the Company’s contribution 
to the Group financial statements.

For each component in the scope of our Group audit, we allocated a materiality that is less than our overall Group materiality. The range of 
materiality allocated across components was between £1m and £10m. Certain components were audited to a local statutory audit materiality 
that was also lower than our overall Group materiality.

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £0.75m for the Group audit 
(2018: £0.75m) and £0.75m for the Company audit (2018: £0.75m) as well as misstatements below those amounts that, in our view, warranted 
reporting for qualitative reasons.

134

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Going concern
In accordance with ISAs (UK) we report as follows:

Reporting obligation

Outcome

We are required to report if we have anything material to add or draw 
attention to in respect of the directors’ statement in the financial 
statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate 
to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the 
financial statements and the directors’ identification of any material 
uncertainties to the Group’s and the Company’s ability to continue as a 
going concern over a period of at least twelve months from the date of 
approval of the financial statements.

We have nothing material to add or to draw attention to.

However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, 
this statement is not a guarantee as to the Group’s and Company’s 
ability to continue as a going concern. For example, as is the case for 
all UK companies, the terms of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from 
the European Union are not clear, and it is difficult to evaluate all of the 
potential implications on the Group’s and Company’s trade, customers, 
suppliers and the wider economy.

We are required to report if the directors’ statement relating to 
Going Concern in accordance with Listing Rule 9.8.6R(3) is materially 
inconsistent with our knowledge obtained in the audit.

We have nothing to report.

Reporting on other information 
The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditors’ report thereon. 
The directors are responsible for the other information. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, 
accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, any form of assurance thereon. 

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether 
the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to 
be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are required to perform procedures to 
conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on 
the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. 
We have nothing to report based on these responsibilities.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

With respect to the Strategic Report and Directors’ Report, we also considered whether the disclosures required by the UK Companies Act 2006 
have been included.

Based on the responsibilities described above and our work undertaken in the course of the audit, the Companies Act 2006 (CA06), ISAs (UK) and 
the Listing Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) require us also to report certain opinions and matters as described below (required by 
ISAs (UK) unless otherwise stated).

Strategic Report and Directors’ Report
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit, the information given in the Strategic Report and Directors’ Report 
for the year ended 31 December 2019 is consistent with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with applicable legal 
requirements. (CA06)

In light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and Company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit, we did not 
identify any material misstatements in the Strategic Report and Directors’ Report. (CA06)

135

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE  
MEMBERS OF THE WEIR GROUP PLC
CONTINUED

The directors’ assessment of the prospects of the Group and of the principal risks that would threaten the solvency  
or liquidity of the Group
We have nothing material to add or draw attention to regarding:

•  The directors’ confirmation on page 54 of the Annual Report that they have carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks facing the 

Group, including those that would threaten its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity.

•  The disclosures in the Annual Report that describe those risks and explain how they are being managed or mitigated.

•  The directors’ explanation on page 90 of the Annual Report as to how they have assessed the prospects of the Group, over what period they 

have done so and why they consider that period to be appropriate, and their statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that 
the Group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of their assessment, including any related 
disclosures drawing attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions.

We have nothing to report having performed a review of the directors’ statement that they have carried out a robust assessment of the principal 
risks facing the Group and statement in relation to the longer-term viability of the Group. Our review was substantially less in scope than an 
audit and only consisted of making inquiries and considering the directors’ process supporting their statements; checking that the statements 
are in alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code (the ‘Code’); and considering whether the statements 
are consistent with the knowledge and understanding of the Group and Company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit. 
(Listing Rules)

Other Code Provisions
We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report when: 

•  The statement given by the directors, on page 129, that they consider the Annual Report taken as a whole to be fair, balanced and 

understandable, and provides the information necessary for the members to assess the Group’s and Company’s position and performance, 
business model and strategy is materially inconsistent with our knowledge of the Group and Company obtained in the course of performing 
our audit.

•  The section of the Annual Report on page 94 describing the work of the Audit Committee does not appropriately address matters 

communicated by us to the Audit Committee.

•  The directors’ statement relating to the Company’s compliance with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision 

of the Code specified, under the Listing Rules, for review by the auditors.

Directors’ Remuneration
In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 
2006. (CA06)

Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit
Responsibilities of the directors for the financial statements
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities set out on page 129, the directors are responsible for the preparation of 
the financial statements in accordance with the applicable framework and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. The directors 
are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from 
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Company’s ability to continue as a going 
concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either 
intend to liquidate the Group or the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, 
whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, 
but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. 
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to 
influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements. 

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC’s website at: www.frc.org.uk/
auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditors’ report.

136

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Use of this report
This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the Company’s members as a body in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 
of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose 
or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent 
in writing.

Other required reporting
Companies Act 2006 exception reporting
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:

•  we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or

•  adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not 

visited by us; or

•  certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or

•  the Company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting 

records and returns. 

We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility. 

Appointment
Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, we were appointed by the members on 28 April 2016 to audit the financial statements 
for the year ended 31 December 2016 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement is 4 years, covering the 
years ended 31 December 2016 to 31 December 2019.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

LINDSAY GARDINER (SENIOR STATUTORY AUDITOR)
for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors

Glasgow

26 February 2020

137

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2019

Year ended 31 December 2019

Year ended 31 December 2018

Before 
exceptional 
items & 
intangibles 
amortisation
£m

Exceptional 
items & 
intangibles 
amortisation 
(note 5)
£m

Notes

Before 
exceptional 
items & 
intangibles 
amortisation
£m

Exceptional 
items & 
intangibles 
amortisation
(note 5)
£m

Total
£m

Total
£m

3

2,661.9

–

2,661.9

2,449.9

–

2,449.9

15

6
6

7

8

9

345.9
6.2
352.1

(53.9)
4.3

302.5
(73.8)

(674.3)
–
(674.3)

–
–

(674.3)
92.2

(328.4)
6.2
(322.2)

(53.9)
4.3

(371.8)
18.4

345.7
2.4
348.1

(40.7)
2.7

310.1
(78.6)

(224.0)
–
(224.0)

–
–

(224.0)
45.9

121.7
2.4
124.1

(40.7)
2.7

86.1
(32.7)

228.7

(582.1)

(353.4)

231.5

(178.1)

53.4

(51.3)
(229.4)

(229.4)
–
(229.4)

(3.9)
224.8

224.3
0.5
224.8

87.9p

87.4p

(22.1)
(604.2)

(604.2)
–
(604.2)

(26.0)
(379.4)

(379.9)
0.5
(379.4)

(146.4p)
(136.4p)

(146.4p)
(136.4p)

16.3
247.8

247.4
0.4
247.8

94.7p

94.0p

(35.0)
18.4

18.0
0.4
18.4

7.4p
21.7p

7.3p
21.6p

Continuing operations
Revenue
Continuing operations
Operating profit (loss) before share of 
results of joint ventures
Share of results of joint ventures
Operating profit (loss)

Finance costs
Finance income
Profit (loss) before tax from continuing 
operations
Tax (expense) credit

Profit (loss) for the year from 
continuing operations
(Loss) profit for the year from discontinued 
operations
Profit (loss) for the year
Attributable to:
Equity holders of the Company
Non-controlling interests

Earnings (loss) per share
Basic – total operations
Basic – continuing operations

Diluted – total operations
Diluted – continuing operations

138

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT 
OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2019

(Loss) profit for the year
Other comprehensive (expense) income
(Losses) gains taken to equity on cash flow hedges
Exchange (losses) gains on translation of foreign operations
Reclassification of foreign currency translation reserve on discontinued operations
Exchange losses on net investment hedges
Reclassification adjustments on cash flow hedges 
Tax relating to other comprehensive (income) expense to be reclassified in subsequent periods
Items that are or may be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods

Remeasurements on defined benefit plans
Remeasurements on other benefit plans
Tax relating to other comprehensive (expense) income not to be reclassified in subsequent periods
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods

Net other comprehensive (expense) income

Total net comprehensive (expense) income for the year

Attributable to:
Equity holders of the Company
Non-controlling interests

Total net comprehensive (expense) income for the year attributable to equity holders of the Company
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations

Year ended
31 December
2019
£m
(379.4)

Year ended
31 December
2018
£m
18.4

Notes

7

23

7

(1.3)
(105.3)
(20.5)
(2.4)
0.7
(0.2)
(129.0)

(5.2)
(0.1)
0.8
(4.5)

(133.5)

(512.9)

(513.2)
0.3
(512.9)

(466.5)
(46.7)
(513.2)

0.8
76.1
–
(72.8)
(2.6)
3.0
4.5

53.7
0.3
(8.9)
45.1

49.6

68.0

67.5
0.5
68.0

153.3
(85.8)
67.5

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

139

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AT 31 DECEMBER 2019

ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant & equipment
Intangible assets
Investments in joint ventures
Deferred tax assets
Other receivables
Derivative financial instruments
Total non-current assets
Current assets
Inventories
Trade & other receivables
Derivative financial instruments
Income tax receivable
Cash & short-term deposits
Assets held for sale
Total current assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Interest-bearing loans & borrowings
Trade & other payables
Derivative financial instruments
Income tax payable
Provisions
Liabilities held for sale
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Interest-bearing loans & borrowings
Other payables
Derivative financial instruments
Provisions
Deferred tax liabilities
Retirement benefit plan deficits
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
NET ASSETS
CAPITAL & RESERVES
Share capital
Share premium
Merger reserve
Treasury shares
Capital redemption reserve
Foreign currency translation reserve
Hedge accounting reserve
Retained earnings
Shareholders' equity
Non-controlling interests
TOTAL EQUITY

31 December 
2019
£m

31 December 
2018
£m

Notes

11
12
15
22
17
29

16
17
29

18
8

19
20
29

21
8

19
20
29
21
22
23

24

571.2
1,573.0
36.6
61.2
77.1
4.4
2,323.5

642.9
557.9
16.5
37.6
273.8
–
1,528.7
3,852.2

534.1
589.6
24.8
22.6
42.2
–
1,213.3

896.2
–
0.3
61.3
29.0
138.7
1,125.5
2,338.8
1,513.4

32.5
582.3
332.6
(0.5)
0.5
(26.7)
0.7
590.6
1,512.0
1.4
1,513.4

427.1
2,166.6
36.6
36.0
78.5
1.4
2,746.2

692.7
597.7
18.3
32.5
263.0
394.4
1,998.6
4,744.8

662.5
629.9
40.8
25.3
50.5
134.0
1,543.0

740.9
0.8
0.2
69.7
92.2
149.1
1,052.9
2,595.9
2,148.9

32.5
582.3
332.6
(2.1)
0.5
101.3
1.5
1,095.0
2,143.6
5.3
2,148.9

The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 26 February 2020. The financial statements also 
comprise the notes on pages 144-198.

JON STANTON 
Director    

JOHN HEASLEY
Director

140

 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2019

Total operations
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash generated from operations
Additional pension contributions paid
Exceptional cash items
Income tax paid
Net cash generated from operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired 
Purchases of property, plant & equipment
Purchases of intangible assets
Other proceeds from sale of property, plant & equipment and intangible assets
Disposals of discontinued operations, net of cash disposed and disposal costs
Interest received
Dividends received from joint ventures
Net cash generated from (used in) investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from borrowings
Repayments of borrowings
Lease payments
Settlement of derivative financial instruments
Exceptional cash items – settlement of derivative financial instruments
Interest paid
Dividends paid to equity holders of the Company
Issue of shares, net of transaction costs
Purchase of shares for employee share plans
Net cash (used in) generated from financing activities

Net increase (decrease) in cash & cash equivalents
Cash & cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
Foreign currency translation differences
Cash & cash equivalents at the end of the year

The cash flows from discontinued operations included above are disclosed separately in note 8.

Year ended 
31 December 
2019
£m

Year ended 
31 December 
2018
£m

Notes

25

407.6
(12.9)
(41.0)
(90.2)
263.5

(0.1)
(93.3)
(23.3)
12.3
244.7
2.7
3.5
146.5

1,673.7
(1,782.8)
(44.3)
(62.2)
–
(47.3)
(121.7)
–
(10.0)
(394.6)

15.4
277.2
(20.5)
272.1

410.8
(5.6)
(114.0)
(73.3)
217.9

(429.6)
(77.7)
(11.4)
3.9
0.3
3.0
1.6
(509.9)

1,438.4
(1,335.5)
–
(22.1)
(27.8)
(39.6)
(79.6)
355.5
(0.8)
288.5

(3.5)
284.5
(3.8)
277.2

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

25

25

15

10
24

18

141

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2019

Share  
capital
£m
28.1
–

Share 
premium
£m
197.9
–

Merger 
reserve
£m
9.4
–

Treasury 
shares
£m
(5.9)
–

Capital 
redemption 
reserve
£m
0.5
–

Foreign 
currency 
translation 
reserve
£m
98.1
–

Hedge 
accounting 
reserve
£m
0.3
–

Attributable 
to equity 
holders 
of the 
Company 
£m
1,467.4
18.0

Retained 
earnings
£m
1,139.0
18.0

Non-
controlling 
interests
£m
1.3
0.4

Total 
equity
£m
1,468.7
18.4

At 31 December 2017
Profit for the year 
Gains taken to equity 
on cash flow hedges
Exchange gains on 
translation of foreign 
operations
Exchange losses 
on net investment 
hedges
Reclassification 
adjustments on cash 
flow hedges 
Remeasurements on 
defined benefit plans
Remeasurements on 
other benefit plans
Tax relating to other 
comprehensive 
income (expense)
Total net 
comprehensive 
income for the year
Acquisition of non-
controlling interest 
through business 
combination
Issue of shares, net of 
transaction costs
Cost of share-based 
payments inclusive of 
tax charge
Dividends
Purchase of shares
Exercise of share-
based payments
At 31 December 2018
(Loss) profit for the 
year
Losses taken to equity 
on cash flow hedges
Exchange losses on 
translation of foreign 
operations
Reclassification 
of exchange gains 
on discontinued 
operations
Exchange losses 
on net investment 
hedges
Reclassification 
adjustments on cash 
flow hedges 
Remeasurements on 
defined benefit plans

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

4.4

384.4

323.2

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–
–

–
–
–

–
–
–

–
32.5

–
582.3

–
332.6

–
–
(0.8)

4.6
(2.1)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–
–

–

0.8

0.8

–

0.8

76.0

0.1

76.1

(72.8)

(2.6)

53.7

53.7

0.3

0.3

3.0

(8.9)

(5.9)

–

–

–

–

–

(72.8)

(2.6)

53.7

0.3

(5.9)

76.0

(72.8)

–

–

–

–

3.2

1.2

63.1

67.5

0.5

68.0

–

–

–
–
–

–

–

–
–
–

–

–

8.3
(110.8)
–

–

3.5

3.5

712.0

8.3
(110.8)
(0.8)

–

–
–
–

712.0

8.3
(110.8)
(0.8)

–
0.5

–
101.3

–
1.5

(4.6)
1,095.0

–
2,143.6

–
5.3

–
2,148.9

–

(379.9)

(379.9)

0.5

(379.4)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(2.6)

–

–

(1.3)

–

–

–

0.7

–

(1.3)

–

(1.3)

(105.1)

(0.2)

(105.3)

(20.5)

(2.4)

0.7

–

–

–

–

(20.5)

(2.4)

0.7

(5.2)

(5.2)

(5.2)

–

–

(105.1)

(20.5)

(2.4)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

142

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Share  
capital
£m

Share 
premium
£m

Merger 
reserve
£m

Treasury 
shares
£m

Capital 
redemption 
reserve
£m

Foreign 
currency 
translation 
reserve
£m

Hedge 
accounting 
reserve
£m

Attributable 
to equity 
holders 
of the 
Company 
£m

Non-
controlling 
interests
£m

Retained 
earnings
£m

–

–

–

(0.1)

(0.1)

(0.2)

0.8

0.6

–

–

Total 
equity
£m

(0.1)

0.6

Remeasurements on 
other benefit plans
Tax relating to other 
comprehensive 
expense (income)
Total net 
comprehensive 
(expense) income for 
the year
Cost of share-based 
payments inclusive of 
tax charge
Dividends
Purchase of shares
Reduction in non-
controlling interests
Exercise of share-
based payments
At 31 December 2019

–

–

–

–
–
–

–

–

–

–

–
–
–

–

–

–

–

–
–
–

–

–
32.5

–
582.3

–
332.6

–

–

–

–
–
(10.0)

–

11.6
(0.5)

–

–

–

–
–
–

–

(128.0)

(0.8)

(384.4)

(513.2)

0.3

(512.9)

–
–
–

–

–
–
–

–

13.3
(121.7)
–

13.3
(121.7)
(10.0)

–
–
–

13.3
(121.7)
(10.0)

–

–

(4.2)

(4.2)

–
0.5

–
(26.7)

–
0.7

(11.6)
590.6

–
1,512.0

–
1.4

–
1,513.4

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

143

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. AUTHORISATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The Consolidated Financial Statements of The Weir Group PLC (the ‘Company’) and its subsidiaries (together, the ‘Group’) for the year ended 
31 December 2019 (‘2019’) were approved and authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Directors on 26 February 2020. 
The comparative information is presented for the year ended 31 December 2018 (‘2018’). 

The Consolidated Financial Statements of The Weir Group PLC have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting 
Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union and interpretations issued by the IFRS Interpretations Committee (‘IFRS IC’) and applied in 
accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006.

The Weir Group PLC is a public limited company, limited by shares, incorporated in Scotland, United Kingdom and is listed on the London Stock 
Exchange. The principal activities of the Group are described in note 3.

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of preparation
These financial statements are presented in sterling. All values are rounded to the nearest 0.1 million pounds (£m) except where 
otherwise indicated.

The financial statements have been prepared on a historic cost basis except where measured at fair value as outlined in the accounting policies.

The accounting policies which follow are consistent with those of the previous period with the exception of the following standards, amendments 
and interpretations which are effective for the year ended 31 December 2019:

IFRS 16 ‘Leases’;

i) 
ii)  Prepayment Features with Negative Compensation – Amendments to IFRS 9;
iii)  Long-term Interest in Associates and Joint Ventures – Amendments to IAS 28;
iv)  Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2015 – 2017 Cycle;
v)  Plan Amendment, Curtailment or Settlement – Amendments to IAS 19; and
vi)  Interpretation 23 Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments

With the exception of IFRS 16 ‘Leases’, discussed below, the other new standards, amendments and interpretations listed above are not 
considered to have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group. 

The International Accounting Standards Board and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee have issued the following 
standards, amendments and interpretations, which are considered relevant to the Group, with an effective date after the period covered by these 
financial statements.

International Accounting Standards (IAS/IFRS)

Amendment to IFRS 3 ‘Business combinations’ 

Amendment to IAS 1 and IAS 8 regarding the definition of materiality 

Amendment to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 regarding interest rate benchmark reform

*  Not yet endorsed for use in the European Union.

Effective date for periods commencing

1 January 2020*

1 January 2020

1 January 2020

The above amendments will be adopted in accordance with their effective dates and have not been adopted in these financial statements. 
The amendments and improvements which have not yet been endorsed are not anticipated to have a significant financial impact.

IFRS 16 ‘Leases’
The Group adopted IFRS 16 on 1 January 2019. The standard has resulted in many operating leases being recognised as right-of-use assets and 
lease liabilities on the balance sheet, as the distinction between operating and finance leases is removed. The Group has applied the modified 
retrospective transition method, and consequently comparative information is not restated. 

Within opening balances as at 1 January 2019, the Group has recognised £176.9m of continuing right-of-use assets. A corresponding continuing 
IFRS 16 lease liability of £181.1m has been recognised, representing the obligation to make lease payments. Right-of-use assets were initially 
valued as equal to lease liabilities, then adjusted to reflect prepayments, rent free periods and provisions including onerous lease contracts 
recognised on balance sheet at 31 December 2018.

The balance sheet transition impact by line item on the closing 2018 Consolidated Balance Sheet is shown in the table opposite. Further IFRS 16 
data review completed during the year identified additional transition adjustments which have also been reflected in the table. 

144

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Impact of IFRS 16 transition on 2018 Consolidated Balance Sheet

Property, plant & equipment (note 11)
Trade & other receivables
Assets held for sale
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings (total) (note 19)
Trade & other payables
Provisions (current) (note 21)
Liabilities held for sale
Other
NET ASSETS

31 December 2018 
£m
427.1
597.7
394.4
(1,403.4)
(629.9)
(50.5)
(134.0)
2,947.5
2,148.9

IFRS 16 impact* 
£m
176.9
(1.2)
13.0
(181.1)
2.8
2.6
(13.0)
–
–

1 January 2019 
£m
604.0
596.5
407.4
(1,584.5)
(627.1)
(47.9)
(147.0)
2,947.5
2,148.9

*  The IFRS 16 impact includes adjustments to the position disclosed in the 2019 interim results. These adjustments are not considered material.

For each lease, the lease term has been calculated as the non-cancellable period of the lease contract, except where the Group is reasonably 
certain that it will exercise contractual extension options. 

The Group has elected to use the following practical expedients allowed by the standard:

•  On initial application:

i)  the use of hindsight when determining the lease term if the contract contains options to extend or terminate the lease;
ii)  the exclusion of initial direct costs from the measurement of the right-of-use asset;
iii)  IFRS 16 has only been applied to contracts that were previously classified as leases;
iv)  reliance on previous assessments on whether leases are onerous instead of performing an impairment review; and
v)  leases where the lease term ends within 12 months of the date of initial application of IFRS 16 are classified as short-term.

•  Lease payments for contracts with a duration of 12 months or less and contracts for which the underlying asset is of a low value continue to 

be expensed in the income statement.

For operating leases now recognised on the balance sheet, the operating lease expenses have been replaced by a depreciation expense on the 
right-of-use assets recognised and an interest expense.

Where the interest rate implicit in the lease cannot be readily determined, the Group’s incremental borrowing rate is used. The Group’s 
incremental borrowing rate is calculated by taking the government borrowing rate in any given currency and adding the estimated Group credit 
spreads for a variety of tenors. An interpolation is performed to obtain one rate for each of the major lease currencies based on the weighted 
average life of the lease book. The incremental borrowing rates applied at transition were:

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

•  Leases in AUD: 3.52%
•  Leases in CAD: 3.50%
•  Leases in GBP: 2.45%
•  Leases in USD and other currencies: 4.20%

The adoption of IFRS 16 in the year to 31 December 2019 for continuing operations resulted in an increase in depreciation of £42.4m and finance 
costs of £7.6m. Operating expenses decreased by £36.4m, with 2018 lease expenses of £53.6m offset by £15.1m of short-term lease costs, 
£1.7m of low value asset costs and £0.4m of variable lease payments not included in liabilities. 

Excluding the impact of ESCO acquired in H2 2018 for continuing operations, there was an increase in depreciation of £36.7m and finance costs 
of £6.8m. Operating expenses decreased by £35.5m, with 2018 lease expenses of £49.8m offset by £13.1m of short-term lease costs, £1.0m 
of low value asset costs and £0.2m of variable lease payments not included in liabilities. There is also a change in presentation of cash flows 
for leases previously accounted for as operating leases, which are now presented as cash flows from financing activities rather than cash flows 
from operating activities. The overall impact of lease cash flows on total operations for both the current and prior years, including the change in 
presentation described, is shown in the table below.

145

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Cash flow impact on total operations of IFRS 16

Right-of-use depreciation
Operating lease expenses
Operating profit – total operations
Add back: right-of-use depreciation
Net cash generated from operating activities
Lease payments
IFRS 16 interest lease payments (included in ‘Interest paid’)
2018 finance lease payments (included in ‘Repayments of borrowings’)
Net cash used in financing activities
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

2019
£m
(42.4)
(18.1)
(60.5)
42.4
(18.1)
(44.3)
(7.7)
–
(52.0)
(70.1)

2018
£m
–
(58.4)
(58.4)
–
(58.4)
–
–
(0.8)
(0.8)
(59.2)

Variance
£m
(42.4)
40.3
(2.1)
42.4
40.3
(44.3)
(7.7)
0.8
(51.2)
(10.9)

The reconciliation from operating commitments disclosed under IAS 17 ‘Leases’ to the lease liability recognised on the balance sheet at 
1 January 2019 is as follows:

Reconciliation from IAS 17 disclosure to IFRS 16 at 1 January 2019

Operating lease commitments at 31 December 2018 disclosed in Group Annual Report
Transfer of operating lease commitments
Impact of IFRS 16 data review*
Operating lease commitments at 31 December 2018
Impact of discounting
Discounted operating lease commitments at 1 January 2019
Finance lease liabilities recognised as at 31 December 2018
Recognition exemption for short-term leases
Recognition exemption for leases of low value assets
Extension and termination options reasonably certain
Lease liabilities reported at 1 January 2019

Total operations 
£m
(212.3)
–
(14.4)
(226.7)
29.4
(197.3)
(2.5)
8.6
3.2
(8.6)
(196.6)

Discontinued 
operations 
£m
(15.0)
1.3
(0.7)
(14.4)
1.1
(13.3)
–
0.5
0.2
(0.4)
(13.0)

Continuing 
operations  
£m
(197.3)
(1.3)
(13.7)
(212.3)
28.3
(184.0)
(2.5)
8.1
3.0
(8.2)
(183.6)

*  As part of the transition to IFRS 16, a number of operating lease commitments were identified that had not been included in the 2018 Annual Report operating lease commitments disclosure in 

note 26.

Basis of consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the results, cash flows and assets and liabilities of The Weir Group PLC and its subsidiaries, and 
the Group’s share of results of its joint ventures. For consolidation purposes, subsidiaries and joint ventures prepare financial information for the 
same reporting period as the Company using consistent accounting policies.

A subsidiary is an entity controlled, either directly or indirectly, by the Company, where control is achieved when the Group is exposed, or has 
rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. 
The results of a subsidiary acquired during the period are included in the Group’s results from the effective date on which control is transferred 
to the Group. The results of a subsidiary sold during the period are included in the Group’s results up to the effective date on which control is 
transferred out of the Group. All intragroup transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated on consolidation.

Non-controlling interests represent the portion of profit or loss and net assets in subsidiaries that are not held by the Group and are presented 
within equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, separately from the Company Shareholders’ equity.

A full list of the Company’s related undertakings can be found on pages 216-223.

Exceptional items & intangibles amortisation
In order to provide the users of the Consolidated Financial Statements with a more relevant presentation of the Group’s underlying performance, 
on a like-for-like basis, profit for each year has been analysed between:

i)  profit before exceptional items & intangibles amortisation; and
ii)  the effect of exceptional items & intangibles amortisation.

Exceptional items are items of income and expense which, because of the nature, size and/or infrequency of the events giving rise to them, 
merit separate presentation. These specific items are presented on the face of the Consolidated Income Statement to provide greater clarity and 
a better understanding of the impact of these items on the Group’s financial performance. In doing so, it also facilitates greater comparison of 
the Group’s underlying results with prior years and assessment of trends in financial performance. This split is consistent with how underlying 
business performance is measured internally.

146

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Exceptional items may include but are not restricted to: profits or losses arising on disposal or closure of businesses; the cost of significant business 
restructuring; significant impairments of intangible or tangible assets; adjustments to the fair value of acquisition-related items such as contingent 
consideration and inventory; other items deemed exceptional due to their significance, size or nature; and the related exceptional taxation.

Intangibles amortisation is expensed in line with the other intangible assets policy and is shown separately to provide visibility over the impact of both: 

i) 

intangible assets recognised via acquisition, which primarily relate to items which would not normally be capitalised unless identified as part of 
an acquisition opening balance sheet. The ongoing costs associated with these assets are expensed. 

ii)  ongoing multiyear investment activities, which currently include our IT transformation strategy and IoT product development as part of the 

Group’s Industry 4.0 adoption and digitisation strategy.

Further analysis of the items included in the column ‘Exceptional items & intangibles amortisation’ is provided in notes 5 and 12 to the 
financial statements.

Use of estimates and judgements
The Group’s significant accounting policies are set out below. The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements, in conformity with IFRS, 
requires management to make judgements that affect the application of accounting policies and estimates that impact the reported amounts of 
assets, liabilities, income and expense. 

Management bases these judgements on a combination of past experience, professional expert advice and other evidence that is relevant to 
each individual circumstance. Actual results may differ from these judgements and the resulting estimates which are reviewed on an ongoing 
basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the year in which the estimate is revised.

Areas requiring significant judgement in the current year and on a recurring basis are presented to the Audit Committee, as summarised on page 94.

The areas where management considers critical judgements and estimates to be required, which are areas more likely to be materially adjusted 
due to estimates and assumptions turning out to be wrong, are those in respect of the following:

i)  Retirement benefits (estimate)
The assumptions underlying the valuation of retirement benefit assets and liabilities include discount rates, inflation rates and mortality 
assumptions which are based on actuarial advice. Changes in these assumptions could have a material impact on the measurement of the 
Group’s retirement benefit obligations. Sensitivities to changes in key assumptions are provided in note 23.

ii)  Valuation of intangible assets and impairment (estimate)
IFRS requires companies to carry out impairment testing on any assets that show indications of impairment, as well as annually for goodwill and 
other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and so not subject to amortisation. This testing includes exercising management judgement in 
estimating future revenues, margin, cash flows, discount rates, growth rates and other events which are, by their nature, uncertain. During 2019 
impairment testing over the Group’s cash generating units (CGUs) was performed and the details and results of this exercise along with 
appropriate sensitivities are reported in note 14.

iii) Provisions (estimate)
Management judgement is used to determine when a provision is recognised, taking into account the commercial drivers which gave rise to 
them, the Group’s previous experience of similar obligations and the progress of any associated legal proceedings. The calculation of provisions 
typically involves management estimates of associated cash flows and discount rates. The key provision which currently requires a greater 
degree of management estimate is the US asbestos provision, details of which are included in note 21. 

iv) Taxation (estimate)
The level of current and deferred tax recognised in the financial statements is dependent on subjective judgements as to the interpretation of 
complex international tax regulations and, in some cases, the outcome of decisions by tax authorities in various jurisdictions around the world, 
together with the ability of the Group to utilise tax attributes within the limits imposed by the relevant tax legislation. 

The Group faces a variety of tax risks which result from operating in a complex global environment, including the ongoing reform of both 
international and domestic tax rules in some of the Group’s larger markets and the challenge to fulfil ongoing tax compliance filing and transfer 
pricing obligations given the scale and diversity of the Group’s global operations.

The Group makes provision for open tax issues where it is probable that an exposure will arise including, in a number of jurisdictions, ongoing tax 
audits and uncertain tax positions including transfer pricing which are by nature complex and can take a number of years to resolve. In all cases, 
provisions are based on management’s interpretation of tax law in each country, as supported where appropriate by discussion and analysis 
undertaken by the Group’s external advisers, and reflect the single best estimate of the likely outcome for each liability. Provisions for uncertain 
tax positions are included in current tax liabilities and total £20.2m at 31 December 2019.

The Group believes it has made adequate provision for such matters although it is possible that amounts ultimately paid will be different from the 
amounts provided, but not materially within the next 12 months.

Detailed tax disclosures are provided in notes 7 and 22.

v)  Other
Acquisition accounting and discontinued operations were areas in the prior year that required significant estimate and judgement for the 
acquisition of ESCO and the recognition of the Flow Control Division as a discontinued operation in 2018. The finalisation of the ESCO opening 
balance sheet and the completion of the Flow Control disposal in 2019 did not give rise to any significant estimates or judgements in the year. 

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

147

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Joint ventures
The Group has a number of long-term contractual arrangements with other parties which represent joint ventures. The Group’s interests in the 
results and assets and liabilities of its joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method.

These investments are carried in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at cost plus post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of net assets less any 
impairment in value. The Consolidated Income Statement reflects the share of results of operations of these investments after tax. Where there 
has been a change recognised directly in the investee’s equity, the Group recognises its share of any changes and discloses this when applicable 
in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Any goodwill arising on the acquisition of a joint venture, representing the excess of the cost of the investment over the Group’s share of the net 
fair value of the joint venture’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities, is included in the carrying amount of the joint venture and is 
not amortised. To the extent that the net fair value of the joint venture’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities is greater than the 
cost of the investment, a gain is recognised and added to the Group’s share of the joint venture’s profit or loss in the year in which the investment 
is acquired.

Foreign currency translation
The financial statements for each of the Group’s subsidiaries and joint ventures are prepared using their functional currency. The functional 
currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which an entity operates.

At entity level, transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the entity’s functional currency at the exchange rate ruling on 
the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the exchange rate ruling on 
the balance sheet date. Currency translation differences are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement except when hedge accounting 
is applied and for differences on monetary assets and liabilities that form part of the Group’s net investment in a foreign operation. These are 
recognised in other comprehensive income until the disposal of the net investment, at which time they are recognised in profit or loss.

On consolidation, the results of foreign operations are translated into sterling at the average exchange rate for the year and their assets and 
liabilities are translated into sterling at the exchange rate ruling on the balance sheet date. Currency translation differences, including those on 
monetary items that form part of a net investment in a foreign operation, are recognised in the foreign currency translation reserve and in other 
comprehensive income.

In the event that a foreign operation is sold, the gain or loss on disposal recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement is determined after 
taking into account the cumulative currency translation differences that are attributable to the operation. As permitted by IFRS 1 First-time 
Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, the Group elected to deem cumulative currency translation differences to be £nil as 
at 27 December 2003. Accordingly, the gain or loss on disposal of a foreign operation does not include currency translation differences arising 
before that date.

In the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement, the cash flows of foreign operations are translated into sterling at the average exchange rate for 
the year.

Revenue recognition
Revenue is the consideration the Group expects to receive from customers in exchange for goods and services. Revenue is recognised in the 
Consolidated Income Statement when control of goods and services is transferred to the customer. Transfer of control is deemed to be over 
time where the following criteria are met:

•  The customer concurrently receives and consumes the benefits from the Group’s performance;
•  The Group’s performance creates or enhances a customer controlled asset; or
•  The Group’s performance does not create an asset with an alternative use and the Group has a right to payment for performance completed 

to date. 

Where the above criteria are not met then revenue is recognised at a point in time when control is transferred to the customer.

Revenue is shown net of sales taxes, discounts and after eliminating sales within the Group. No revenue is recognised where recovery 
of the consideration is not probable or there are significant uncertainties regarding associated costs, or the possible return of goods. 
Variable consideration is recognised only if it is highly probable that there will not be a significant revenue reversal. The consideration is an 
estimation based on the terms of the contract and other available information. Liquidated damage variable consideration will only be recognised 
where there is a history of recurring liquidated damages for example for the same customer or product line with the value of consideration being 
the most likely amount from a range of possible outcomes. Volume discounts are deducted from revenue based on the most reliable estimates 
of volumes to be purchased. 

The timing of payment from customers is generally aligned to revenue recognition, subject to agreed payment terms usually in line with industry 
standards. Certain contracts may include milestones payments which do not necessarily align to revenue recognition: a contract asset is recorded 
where revenue is recognised in advance of customer invoicing and where cash is received in advance of revenue recognition, a contract liability 
is recognised. 

148

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
i. Sale of goods
This policy is applicable to the sale of both original equipment and spare parts whether sold individually, in bulk or as part of a cross-selling 
marketing strategy. Contracts for the provision of both original equipment and spare parts, and where required services, are combined if one or 
more of the following is met:

•  The contract achieves a single commercial objective and negotiated as a package.
•  The price or performance of one contract influences the amount of consideration to be paid in the other contract.
•  The goods or services in the separate contracts represent a single performance obligation.

Each cross-selling contract is reviewed to identify the performance obligations in relation to original equipment and spare parts with them only 
being combined if they are not capable of being distinct and are not distinct in the context of the contract. 

Revenue from the sale of goods is generally recognised at a point of time on despatch of goods, in line with incoterms. This reflects when the 
customer obtains control of the product and can determine its future use and location. For larger orders where multiple units are delivered in 
instalments as part of one performance obligation, revenue will be recognised over time in line with delivery. These items are a series of distinct 
goods which have the same pattern of transfer of control being the fulfilment of the incoterm, providing the customer has control of the goods as 
they are delivered. 

Where the sale of product requires customer inspection, this is deemed to be part of the main performance obligation so revenue is not 
recognised until the inspection has been completed and approved by the customer. In instances where commissioning is provided, the transfer 
of control for the sale of goods is at the point of despatch where commissioning is a separate performance obligation or once commissioning 
is complete where combined in the sale of goods performance obligation. A separate performance obligation for commissioning is identified 
where a customer could obtain the same service from a third-party supplier with revenue in respect of commissioning being recognised once the 
commissioning is complete. 

ii. Provision of services
The revenue recognition of provision of services is dependent on the nature of the contracts. Shorter-term contracts tend to be for ‘one-off’ 
service provision which means the customer only consumes the benefit from the Group’s performance when the work is complete. Revenue is 
therefore recognised at a point in time for such contracts. For other contracts, revenue from the rendering of services is generally recognised 
over time where the customer concurrently receives and consumes a benefit from the Group’s performance over the period of the contract 
duration. Revenue from services is recognised in proportion to the stage of completion of the performance obligations at the balance sheet date. 
The stage of completion is assessed by reference to the transfer of control over time, which usually corresponds to the contractual agreement 
with each separate customer and the costs incurred on the contract to date in comparison with the total forecast costs of the contract. 

iii. Construction contracts
Revenue for construction contracts is recognised over time as the contracts usually contain discrete elements separately transferring control to 
customers over the life of the contract and the Group’s performance does not create an asset with an alternative use.

The stage of completion of a contract is determined either by reference to the proportion that contract costs incurred for work performed to date 
bear to the estimated total contract costs, or by reference to the completion of a physical proportion of the contract work. Both these methods 
are faithful depictions of the transfer of control given the Group has a right to payment for performance completed to date. The basis used is 
dependent upon the nature of the underlying contract. For instances where the work is subject to formal customer acceptance procedures, 
revenue will only be recognised once the customer review has been completed and approved by the customer as this is the point both parties 
are in agreement that control has been transferred in line with contract terms. Losses on contracts are recognised in the year when such losses 
become probable. 

Property, plant & equipment
Property, plant & equipment comprises owned assets and right-of-use assets that do not meet the definition of investment property.

i. Owned assets
Owned property, plant & equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any recognised impairment losses. Freehold land 
and assets under construction are not depreciated. Depreciation of property, plant & equipment is provided on a straight-line basis so as to 
charge the cost less residual value, to the Consolidated Income Statement over the expected useful life of the asset concerned, and is in the 
following ranges:

Freehold buildings, long leasehold land & buildings   

10 – 40 years

Plant & equipment 

  3 – 20 years

ii. Right-of-use asset and lease liability
Policy applicable from 1 January 2019
At inception of a contract, the Group assess whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract 
conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. To assess whether a contract conveys 
the right to control the use of an identified asset, the Group assesses whether it has both the right to obtain substantially all of the economic 
benefits from use of the identified asset and the right to direct the use of the identified asset throughout the period of use. 

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

149

 
 
 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
The Group recognises a lease liability and right-of-use asset at the lease commencement date. The lease liability is initially measured as the 
present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease, or 
where the interest rate implicit in the lease cannot be readily determined, the Group’s incremental borrowing rate. Generally, the Group uses its 
incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate. The Group’s incremental borrowing rate is calculated by taking the government borrowing rate 
in any given currency and adding the estimated Group credit spreads for a variety of tenors. An interpolation is performed to obtain one rate for 
each of the major lease currencies based on the weighted average life of the lease book.

Lease payments consist of the following components: 

•  fixed payments, including in-substance fixed payments, less any lease incentives receivable; 
•  variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate; 
•  amounts expected to be payable by the lessee under residual value guarantees;
•  the exercise price of a purchase option (if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that option); and 
•  payments of penalties for terminating the lease (if the lease term reflects the lessee exercising the option to terminate the lease). 

The right-of-use asset is measured as equal to the lease liability and adjusted for:

•  lease payments made to the lessor at or before the commencement date; 
•  lease incentives received;
•  initial direct costs associated with the lease; and 
•  an initial estimate of restoration costs. 

The right-of-use asset is depreciated using the straight-line method over the lease term. In addition, the right-of-use asset is periodically reduced 
by any impairment losses. 

The Group has adopted the exemption available for short-term leases, with payments being recognised on a straight-line basis over the lease 
term. Short-term leases are defined as leases with a lease term of 12 months or less. 

The Group has adopted the exemption available for low value assets, with payments being recognised on a straight-line basis over the lease 
term. Leases relating to laptops, desktop computers, mobile phones, photocopiers, printers and other office equipment, where the asset value 
is less than £3,500 or the local currency equivalent have been treated as ‘low value’. Where the lease contract meets both ‘short-term’ and ‘low 
value’ exemptions, the lease is reported within ‘expenses relating to short-term leases’. 

For each lease, the lease term has been calculated as the non-cancellable period of the lease contract, except where the Group is reasonably 
certain that it will exercise contractual extension options. In assessing whether a lessee is reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend a 
lease, or not to exercise an option to terminate a lease, the Group shall consider all relevant facts and circumstances that create an economic 
incentive for the lessee to exercise the option to extend the lease, or not to exercise the option to terminate the lease. In certain circumstances 
the Group will refer to the five-year strategic plan period as an appropriate period to consider whether the ‘reasonably certain’ criteria are met.

Policy applicable before 1 January 2019
Under IAS 17 which transferred to the Group substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership of the leased asset were classified as finance 
leases. All other assets were classified as operating leases. Assets held under finance lease were included within property, plant & equipment, 
initially measured at their fair value or, if lower, the present value of the minimum lease payments, and a corresponding liability was recognised 
within obligations under finance leases. Operating lease rentals and any incentives receivable were recognised in the Consolidated Income 
Statement on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

Goodwill
Goodwill arises on the acquisition of businesses and represents any excess of the cost of the acquired entity over the Group’s interest in the fair 
value of the entity’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities determined at the date of acquisition. Acquisition costs are recognised 
in the Consolidated Income Statement in the year in which they are incurred. Goodwill in respect of an acquired business is recognised as an 
intangible asset. Goodwill is carried at cost less any recognised impairment losses and is tested at least annually or where there are indicators 
of impairment.

The carrying amount of goodwill allocated to a cash generating unit is taken into account when determining the gain or loss on disposal of 
the unit.

Any contingent consideration is recognised at the date of acquisition or disposal. For acquisitions, subsequent changes to the fair value of the 
contingent consideration are adjusted against the cost of acquisition where they qualify as measurement period adjustments. The measurement 
period is the period from the date of acquisition to the date that the Group obtains complete information about facts and circumstances that 
existed as of the acquisition date, and is subject to a maximum of one year. If the change does not qualify as a measurement period adjustment, 
it is reflected in the Consolidated Income Statement. For disposals, any subsequent change in contingent consideration is adjusted against the 
disposal proceeds and the gain or loss on disposal.

150

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Other intangible assets
Other intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and any recognised impairment losses.

Intangible assets acquired separately are measured at cost on initial recognition. An intangible resource acquired in a business combination is 
recognised as an intangible asset if it is separable from the acquired business or arises from contractual or legal rights, is expected to generate 
future economic benefits and its fair value can be measured reliably. 

An intangible asset with a finite life is amortised on a straight-line basis so as to charge its cost, which in respect of an acquired intangible asset 
represents its fair value at the acquisition date, to the income statement over its expected useful life. An intangible asset with an indefinite life is 
not amortised but is tested at least annually for impairment and carried at cost less any recognised impairment losses.

The expected useful lives of acquired intangible assets are as follows:

Brand names 

Customer & distributor relationships 

Purchased software   

Intellectual property & trademarks 

Other 

indefinite life*

5 – 30 years

4 – 8 years

6 – 15 years

up to 6 years

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

*  Acquired brands which are considered to have a finite life are amortised accordingly.

Research & development costs
All research expenditure is charged to the Consolidated Income Statement in the year in which it is incurred.

Development expenditure is charged to the Consolidated Income Statement in the year in which it is incurred unless it relates to the 
development of a new product or technology and it is incurred after the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the product has been 
proven, the development costs can be measured reliably, future economic benefits are probable and the Group intends, and has sufficient 
resources, to complete the development and to use or sell the asset. Any such capitalised development expenditure is amortised on a 
straight-line basis so that it is charged to the Consolidated Income Statement over the expected life of the resulting product or technology.

Impairment of non-current assets
All non-current assets are tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that their carrying values might be impaired. 
Additionally, goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite life are subject to an annual impairment test.

An impairment loss is recognised to the extent that an asset’s carrying value exceeds its recoverable amount, which represents the higher of the 
asset’s fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. An asset’s value in use represents the present value of the future cash flows expected to 
be derived from the asset. Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the impairment test is conducted 
for the cash generating unit to which it belongs. Similarly, the recoverable amount of goodwill is determined by reference to the discounted future 
cash flows of the cash generating units to which it is allocated.

Impairment losses are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement. Impairment losses recognised in previous periods for an asset other 
than goodwill are reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount. The carrying amount 
of an asset shall not be increased above the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the 
asset in prior periods. Impairment losses recognised in respect of goodwill are not reversed.

Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value, with due allowance for any obsolete or slow-moving items. Cost represents 
the expenditure incurred in bringing inventories to their existing location and condition and comprises the cost of raw materials, direct labour 
costs, other direct costs and related production overheads. Raw material cost is generally determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Net realisable 
value is the estimated selling price less costs to complete and sell.

Financial assets & liabilities
The Group’s principal financial assets and liabilities, other than derivatives, comprise bank overdrafts, short-term borrowings, loans and fixed-rate 
notes, commercial paper, cash and short-term deposits. The Group also has other financial assets and liabilities such as trade receivables, trade 
payables and leases which arise directly from its operations.

A financial asset is generally derecognised when the contract that gives rise to it is settled, sold, cancelled or expires.

A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged, cancelled or expires. Where an existing financial liability is 
replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an 
exchange or modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability, such that the difference in the 
respective carrying amounts together with any costs or fees incurred are recognised in profit or loss. Under IFRS 9, where the modification is not 
substantial, any difference in the modified cash flows is recognised in profit or loss. 

151

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Trade receivables
Trade receivables, which are generally of a short-term nature, are recognised at original invoice amount where the consideration is unconditional. 
If they contain significant financing components, trade receivables are instead recognised at fair value. The Group holds trade receivables to 
collect the contractual cash flows and therefore measures them subsequently at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Details of 
the Group’s impairment policies and the calculation of the loss allowance are provided in note 17 and the policy in respect of invoice discounting 
is included in note 29. 

Cash & cash equivalents
Cash & cash equivalents comprise cash in hand, deposits available on demand and other short-term highly liquid investments with a maturity 
on acquisition of three months or less and bank overdrafts and short-term borrowings with a maturity on acquisition of three months or less. 
Bank overdrafts are presented as current liabilities to the extent that there is no right of offset with cash balances.

Trade payables
Trade payables are recognised and carried at original invoice amount. The Group’s supply chain financing programme policy and assessment for 
the period is provided in note 20. 

Interest-bearing loans & borrowings
Obligations for loans and borrowings are recognised when the Group becomes party to the related contracts and are measured initially at fair 
value less directly attributable transaction costs. After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at 
amortised cost using the effective interest method. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any issue costs and any discount or 
premium on settlement. Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to settle the liability at least 
12 months after the balance sheet date.

Provisions
A provision is recognised in the Consolidated Balance Sheet when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, the 
obligation can be estimated reliably and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. If the effect is 
material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of 
the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability.

Derivative financial instruments & hedge accounting
The Group uses derivative financial instruments, principally forward foreign currency contracts and cross currency swaps, to reduce its exposure 
to exchange rate movements. The Group also uses foreign currency borrowings as a hedge of its exposure to foreign exchange risk on its 
investments in foreign subsidiaries. Additionally, the Group uses interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to interest rate risk. The Group does 
not hold or issue derivatives for speculative or trading purposes.

Derivative financial instruments are recognised as assets and liabilities measured at their fair values at the balance sheet date. The fair value 
of forward foreign currency contracts is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows based on spot and forward foreign 
exchange rates and counterparty and the Group’s own credit risk. The fair value of interest rate swaps and cross currency swaps is calculated as 
the present value of the estimated future cash flows based on interest rate curves, spot foreign exchange rates and counterparty and own credit 
risk. Changes in their fair values are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement, except where hedge accounting is used, provided the 
conditions specified by IFRS 9 are met. Hedge accounting is applied in respect of hedge relationships where it is both permissible under IFRS 9 
and practical to do so. When hedge accounting is used, the relevant hedging relationships are classified as fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or 
net investment hedges, as appropriate.

Where the hedging relationship is classified as a fair value hedge, the carrying amount of the hedged asset or liability will be adjusted by the 
increase or decrease in its fair value attributable to the hedged risk and the resulting gain or loss will be recognised in the Consolidated Income 
Statement where, to the extent that the hedge is effective, it will be offset by the change in the fair value of the hedging instrument.

Where the hedging relationship is classified as a cash flow or net investment hedge, to the extent that the hedge is effective, changes in the 
fair value of the hedging instrument will be recognised directly in other comprehensive income. When the hedged asset or liability is recognised 
in the financial statements, the accumulated gains and losses recognised in other comprehensive income will be either recycled to the income 
statement or, if the hedged item results in a non-financial asset, will be recognised as adjustments to its initial carrying amount.

The Group hedges the foreign currency risk of its commercial paper with cross currency swaps which are designated as hedging instruments in 
cash flow hedges where the terms of the derivatives match the terms of the hedged exposure. The Group designates the spot component of the 
contracts as the hedged risk, where the forward points element is excluded from the hedge designation and accounted for as costs of hedging 
under IFRS 9 and transferred to profit or loss when the hedged transaction occurs. To the extent that the hedges are determined to be highly 
effective, the effective portion is recognised in other comprehensive income within the hedge accounting reserve and any ineffective portion 
recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or no longer qualifies for hedge 
accounting. At that point in time, any cumulative gain or loss on the hedging instrument recognised through other comprehensive income is kept 
in equity until the forecasted transaction occurs. If a hedged transaction is no longer expected to occur, the net cumulative gain or loss that was 
reported in equity is immediately reclassified to the income statement in the period.

152

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Derivatives embedded in non-derivative host contracts, which are not already measured at fair value through profit or loss, are recognised 
separately as derivative financial instruments when their risks and characteristics are not closely related to those of the host contract and the host 
contract is not stated at its fair value with changes in its fair value recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement. 

Where items are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement, these are presented within operating profit or finance costs dependent on 
their nature.

Share-based payments
Equity settled share-based incentives are provided to employees under the Group’s Share Reward Plan (SRP), formerly the Long Term Incentive 
Plan (LTIP), the Weir ShareBuilder Plan (WSBP) and as a consequence of occasional one-off conditional awards made to employees. 

The fair value of SRP awards and one-off conditional awards at the date of the grant is calculated using appropriate option pricing models and 
the cost is recognised on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Adjustments are made to reflect expected and actual forfeitures during the 
vesting period due to failure to satisfy service or performance conditions. The conditions of the SRP which took effect in 2018 are summarised in 
the Directors’ Remuneration Policy, which can be found on the Company’s website at www.corporategovernance.weir.

The fair value of WSBP awards at grant date is calculated as the share price at the date of the grant less an adjustment for loss of reinvestment 
return on the dividend equivalent. There are no performance conditions attached to these awards but participants who leave the Company 
prior to vesting lose their right to the awards. The terms of the share awards granted under the WSBP are set out on the plan’s website at 
www.sharebuilder.weir.

Treasury shares
The Weir Group PLC shares held by the Company are classified in Shareholders’ equity as treasury shares and are recognised at cost. 
Consideration received for the sale of such shares is also recognised in equity, with any difference between the proceeds from sale and the 
original cost being taken directly to retained earnings. No gain or loss is recognised in total comprehensive income on the purchase, sale, 
issue or cancellation of equity shares.

Post-employment benefits
Post-employment benefits comprise pension benefits provided to certain current and former employees in the UK, US and Canada and 
post-retirement healthcare benefits provided to certain employees in the US.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

For defined benefit pension and post-retirement healthcare plans, the annual service cost is calculated using the projected unit credit method 
and is recognised over the future service lives of participating employees, in accordance with the advice of qualified actuaries. Current service 
cost and administration expenses are recognised in operating costs and net interest on the net pension liability is recognised in finance costs.

The finance cost recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement in the year reflects the net interest on the net pension liability. 
This represents the change in the net pension liability resulting from the passage of time, and is determined by applying the discount rate to the 
opening net liability, taking into account employer contributions paid into the plan, and hence reducing the net liability, during the year.

Past service costs resulting from enhanced benefits are recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement. Actuarial gains and 
losses, which represent differences between interest on the plan assets, experience on the benefit obligation and the effect of changes in 
actuarial assumptions, are recognised in full in other comprehensive income in the year in which they occur.

The defined benefit liability or asset recognised in the Consolidated Balance Sheet comprises the net total for each plan of the present value 
of the benefit obligation, using a discount rate based on yields at the balance sheet date on appropriate high-quality corporate bonds that have 
maturity dates approximating the terms of the Group’s obligations and are denominated in the currency in which the benefits are expected to 
be paid, minus the fair value of the plan assets, if any, at the balance sheet date. The balance sheet asset recognised is limited to the present 
value of economic benefits which the Group expects to recover by way of refunds or a reduction in future contributions. In order to calculate the 
present value of economic benefits, consideration is also given to any minimum funding requirements.

For defined contribution plans, the cost represents the Group’s contributions to the plans and these are charged to the Consolidated Income 
Statement in the year in which they fall due, along with any associated administration costs.

Taxation
Current tax is the amount of tax payable or recoverable in respect of the taxable profit or loss for the year.

Deferred tax liabilities represent tax payable in future years in respect of taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets represent tax 
recoverable in future years in respect of deductible temporary differences, the carry forward of unutilised tax losses and the carry forward of 
unused tax credits. Deferred tax is measured on an undiscounted basis using the tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively 
enacted at the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the deferred tax asset is realised or the deferred tax liability is settled.

153

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Deferred tax is recognised on temporary differences between the carrying amount of an asset or liability in the balance sheet and its tax base 
with the following exceptions:

i)  Deferred tax arising from the initial recognition of goodwill, or of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination, that, at 

the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss, is not recognised;

ii)  Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and joint ventures, except where the timing of the 
reversal of the temporary difference can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable 
future; and

iii)  A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can 

be utilised.

Current and deferred tax is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement except if it relates to an item recognised directly in equity, in which 
case it is recognised directly in equity.

Alternative performance measures
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union 
and applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006. In measuring our performance, the financial measures that we 
use include those which have been derived from our reported results in order to eliminate factors which we believe distort period-on-period 
comparisons. These are considered alternative performance measures. This information, along with comparable GAAP measurements, is useful 
to investors in providing a basis for measuring our operational performance. Our management uses these financial measures, along with the 
most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, in evaluating our performance and value creation. Alternative performance measures should 
not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information in compliance with GAAP. Alternative performance measures as 
reported by the Group may not be comparable with similarly titled amounts reported by other companies.

Below we set out our definitions of alternative performance measures and provide reconciliations to relevant GAAP measures.

Free cash flow
Free cash flow (FCF) is defined as cash flow from operating activities adjusted for income taxes, net capital expenditures, lease payments, 
net interest payments, dividends paid, settlement of derivatives, purchase of shares for employee share plans and other awards and pension 
contributions. FCF reflects an additional way of viewing our liquidity that we believe is useful to investors as it represents cash flows that 
could be used for repayment of debt or to fund our strategic initiatives, including acquisitions, if any. The reconciliation of cash generated from 
operations to FCF is as follows.

Cash generated from operations before exceptional cash items (note 25)*
Income tax paid
Net capital expenditure from purchase & disposal of property, plant & equipment and intangibles
Lease payments*
Net interest paid*
Dividends paid to equity holders of the Company
Dividends received from joint ventures
Settlement of derivative financial instruments
Purchase of shares for employee share plans
Additional pension contributions paid
Free cash flow

2019 
£m
407.6
(90.2)
(104.3)
(44.3)
(44.6)
(121.7)
3.5
(62.2)
(10.0)
(12.9)
(79.1)

2018 
£m
410.8
(73.3)
(85.2)
–
(36.6)
(79.6)
1.6
(22.1)
(0.8)
(5.6)
109.2

*   Only short-term and low value lease cash outflows are included in cash generated from operations before exceptional cash items in 2019 compared to all operating lease cash flows in 2018. 
Due to the adoption of IFRS 16 ‘Leases’, lease cash flows are reported under the financing activities of the Group in the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement. Furthermore, net interest paid 
includes interest paid in relation to leases. The full cash flow impact of IFRS 16 is disclosed in the basis of preparation.

Cash flows from operating activities (operating cash flow)
Operating cash flow excludes additional pension contributions, exceptional cash items and income tax paid. This reflects our view of the 
underlying cash generation of the business. A reconciliation to the GAAP measure ‘Net cash generated from operating activities’ is provided in 
the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement.

Working capital as a percentage of sales
Working capital includes inventories, trade & other receivables, trade & other payables and derivative financial instruments as included in the 
Consolidated Balance Sheet, adjusted to exclude insurance contract assets totalling £81.1m included in note 17 and £12.1m of interest accruals 
included in note 20. This working capital measure reflects the figure used by management to monitor the performance of the business and is 
divided by revenue, as included in the Consolidated Income Statement, to arrive at working capital as a percentage of sales.

154

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Underlying EBITDA
EBITDA is operating profit from continuing operations, before exceptional items, intangibles amortisation and depreciation. EBITDA is used in 
conjunction with other GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures to assess our operating performance. A reconciliation of EBITDA to the closest 
equivalent GAAP measure, operating profit, is provided.

Continuing operations
Operating (loss) profit
Adjusted for:
Exceptional items (note 5)
Underlying Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT)
Intangibles amortisation (note 5)
Underlying Earnings before interest, tax and amortisation (EBITA)
Depreciation of owned property, plant & equipment (note 11)*
Underlying EBITDA

2019 
£m

2018 
£m

(322.2)

124.1

596.0
273.8
78.3
352.1
62.4
414.5

157.7
281.8
66.3
348.1
61.8
409.9

*  2019 Underlying EBITDA excludes depreciation (£42.4m) and interest (£7.7m) costs related to the right-of-use assets following the adoption of IFRS 16 ‘Leases’.

Net debt
A reconciliation of net debt to cash & short-term deposits, interest-bearing loans and borrowings is provided in note 25. This includes the impact 
of IFRS 16 ‘Leases’ which was adopted in the year.

3. SEGMENT INFORMATION
For management purposes, the Group is organised into three operating divisions: Minerals, ESCO and Oil & Gas. These three divisions are 
organised and managed separately based on the key markets served and each is treated as an operating segment and a reportable segment 
under IFRS 8. The operating and reportable segments were determined based on the reports reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer which are 
used to make operational decisions. In 2019, for strategic reasons, a procurement entity was moved from Unallocated expenses into the Oil & 
Gas Division and prior year comparatives in Minerals and Oil & Gas have been restated to reflect transactions between the segments.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

The Minerals segment is the global leader in the provision of slurry handling equipment and associated aftermarket support for abrasive 
high-wear applications used in the mining and oil sands markets. The ESCO segment is the world’s leading provider of ground engaging tools 
for surface mining and infrastructure. The Oil & Gas segment provides products and service solutions to upstream, production, transportation 
and related industries. 

The Chief Executive Officer assesses the performance of the operating segments based on operating profit from continuing operations before 
exceptional items (including impairments) and intangibles amortisation (‘segment result’). Finance income and expenditure and associated 
interest-bearing liabilities and derivative financial instruments are not allocated to segments as all treasury activity is managed centrally by the 
Group treasury function. The amounts provided to the Chief Executive Officer with respect to assets and liabilities are measured in a manner 
consistent with that of the financial statements. The assets are allocated based on the operations of the segment and the physical location of the 
asset. The liabilities are allocated based on the operations of the segment. 

Transfer prices between business segments are set on an arm’s length basis, in a manner similar to transactions with third-parties.

155

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

3. SEGMENT INFORMATION continued
The segment information for the reportable segments for 2019 and 2018 is disclosed below. Information for Flow Control is included in note 8. 

Minerals

2019 
£m

Restated 
2018 
£m

2019 
£m

2018 
£m

2019 
£m

Restated 
2018 
£m

ESCO

Oil & Gas

Total continuing operations

Revenue
Sales to external customers
Inter-segment sales
Segment revenue
Eliminations

1,477.8
2.8
1,480.6

1,416.7
2.5
1,419.2

572.0
0.5
572.5

251.8
–
251.8

612.1
27.7
639.8

781.4
26.6
808.0

2019 
£m

2,661.9
31.0
2,692.9
(31.0)
2,661.9

Restated 
2018 
£m

2,449.9
29.1
2,479.0
(29.1)
2,449.9

Sales to external customers – 2018 at 2019 average exchange rates
1,415.4
Sales to external customers

1,477.8

572.0

263.6

612.1

817.4

2,661.9

2,496.4

Segment result
Segment result before share of results  
of joint ventures
Share of results of joint ventures
Segment result 
Unallocated expenses
Operating profit before exceptional items & intangibles amortisation
Total exceptional items & intangibles amortisation
Net finance costs
Profit before tax from continuing operations

270.3
–
270.3

250.2
–
250.2

Segment result – 2018 at 2019 average exchange rates
Segment result before share of results  
of joint ventures
Share of results of joint ventures
Segment result 
Unallocated expenses
Operating profit before exceptional items & intangibles amortisation

270.3
–
270.3

252.6
–
252.6

81.6
1.5
83.1

32.5
0.2
32.7

32.1
4.7
36.8

94.0
2.2
96.2

81.6
1.5
83.1

34.2
0.2
34.4

32.1
4.7
36.8

98.8
2.4
101.2

384.0
6.2
390.2
(38.1)
352.1
(674.3)
(49.6)
(371.8)

384.0
6.2
390.2
(38.1)
352.1

376.7
2.4
379.1
(31.0)
348.1
(224.0)
(38.0)
86.1

385.6
2.6
388.2
(31.1)
357.1

Revenues from any single external customer do not exceed 10% of Group revenue.

156

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Assets & liabilities
Intangible assets
Property, plant & equipment
Working capital assets

Investments in joint ventures
Segment assets
Unallocated assets
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Total assets

Working capital liabilities
Unallocated liabilities
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Total liabilities

Other segment information – total Group
Segment additions to non-current assets
Unallocated additions to non-current assets
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Total additions to non-current assets

Other segment information – total Group
Segment depreciation & amortisation
Segment impairment of property,  
plant & equipment
Segment impairment of intangible assets
Unallocated depreciation & amortisation
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Total depreciation, amortisation & impairment

Minerals

ESCO

Oil & Gas

2019 
£m

2018 
£m

2019 
£m

2018 
£m

2019 
£m

579.5
293.5
701.1
1,574.1
–
1,574.1

606.3
218.1
682.9
1,507.3
–
1,507.3

700.9
122.2
217.0
1,040.1
15.2
1,055.3

747.5
106.1
215.8
1,069.4
15.6
1,085.0

268.0
137.5
297.8
703.3
21.4
724.7

Restated 
2018 
£m

773.9
94.0
399.6
1,267.5
21.0
1,288.5

408.2

402.2

87.8

80.0

133.5

197.2

85.5

47.5

28.6

9.5

41.5

26.9

Total Group

Restated 
2018 
£m

2019 
£m

1,548.4
553.2
1,215.9
3,317.5
36.6
3,354.1
498.1
3,852.2
–
3,852.2

629.5
1,709.3
2,338.8
–
2,338.8

155.6
7.5
163.1
7.4
170.5

2,127.7
418.2
1,298.3
3,844.2
36.6
3,880.8
469.6
4,350.4
394.4
4,744.8

679.4
1,782.5
2,461.9
134.0
2,595.9

83.9
3.9
87.8
5.9
93.7

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

63.4

44.1

37.1

16.8

67.6

54.6

168.1

115.5

1.9
6.3

12.9
3.1

–
–

–
–

28.6
472.9

0.4
–

30.5
479.2
15.0
692.8
–
692.8

13.3
3.1
12.6
144.5
49.0
193.5

The assets and liabilities balances now include right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. The year-on-year movements have been impacted by IFRS 
16 bringing all leases on balance sheet. Refer to note 11 for depreciation on right-of-use assets.

Unallocated assets are continuing operations and primarily comprise cash and short-term deposits, derivative financial instruments, income 
tax receivable, deferred tax assets and retirement benefit surpluses as well as those assets which are used for general head office purposes. 
Unallocated liabilities are continuing operations and primarily comprise interest-bearing loans and borrowings, derivative financial instruments, 
income tax payable, provisions, deferred tax liabilities and retirement benefit deficits as well as liabilities relating to general head office activities. 
Segment additions to non-current assets do not include those additions which have arisen from business combinations (note 13), but do include 
right-of-use assets in the current year.

157

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

3. SEGMENT INFORMATION continued
Geographical information
Geographical information in respect of revenue and non-current assets for 2019 and 2018 is disclosed below. Revenues are allocated based on 
the location to which the product is shipped. Assets are allocated based on the location of the assets and operations. Non-current assets consist 
of property, plant & equipment, intangible assets and investments in joint ventures.

Year ended 31 December 2019
Revenue from continuing operations
Sales to external customers
Non-current assets

UK 
£m

US 
£m

Canada 
£m

28.7
343.3

742.0
1,061.1

366.6
86.2

Year ended 31 December 2018
Revenue from continuing operations
Sales to external customers
Non-current assets

UK 
£m

US 
£m

Canada 
£m

28.0
332.5

802.5
1,554.4

287.9
54.5

The following disclosures are given in relation to continuing operations.

Asia 
Pacific 
£m

298.0
234.3

Asia 
Pacific 
£m

285.7
285.4

Australia 
£m

South 
America 
£m

Middle East & 
Africa 
£m

Europe & 
FSU 
£m

Total 
£m

263.1
181.4

445.6
91.9

331.0
136.7

186.9
45.9

2,661.9
2,180.8

Australia 
£m

South 
America 
£m

Middle East & 
Africa 
£m

Other 
£m

Total 
£m

227.7
152.8

370.3
87.3

305.0
124.1

142.8
39.3

2,449.9
2,630.3

An analysis of the Group’s revenue is as follows:
Original equipment
Aftermarket parts
Sales of goods
Provision of services
Construction contracts
Revenue

Timing of revenue recognition
At a point in time
Over time
Segment revenue
Eliminations

Minerals

ESCO

Oil & Gas

2019 
£m

Restated
2018 
£m

2019 
£m

2018 
£m

2019 
£m

Restated
2018 
£m

1,376.3
104.3
1,480.6

1,343.2
76.0
1,419.2

560.4
12.1
572.5

251.8
–
251.8

628.8
11.0
639.8

798.8
9.2
808.0

2019 
£m

2018 
£m

552.5
1,740.2
2,292.7
313.4
55.8
2,661.9

578.2
1,536.6
2,114.8
310.9
24.2
2,449.9

Total continuing 
operations

2019 
£m

Restated
2018 
£m

2,565.5
127.4
2,692.9
(31.0)
2,661.9

2,393.8
85.2
2,479.0
(29.1)
2,449.9

4. REVENUES & EXPENSES
The following disclosures are given in relation to continuing operations and exclude exceptional items & intangibles amortisation.

A reconciliation of revenue to operating profit is as follows:
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Other operating income
Selling & distribution costs
Administrative expenses 
Share of results of joint ventures
Operating profit

2019
£m

2018
£m

2,661.9
(1,787.7)
874.2
14.6
(270.5)
(272.4)
6.2
352.1

2,449.9
(1,633.0)
816.9
6.2
(245.8)
(231.6)
2.4
348.1

158

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Operating profit from continuing operations is stated after charging:
Cost of inventories recognised as an expense
Depreciation of property, plant & equipment (note 11)
Lease expenses (note 11)
Amortisation of intangible assets (note 12)
Exceptional items (note 5)
Net foreign exchange losses
Net impairment charge of trade receivables excluding additional restructuring action amounts (note 17)

2019
£m

1,787.7
104.8
16.5
78.3
596.0
10.6
1.6

2018
£m

1,633.0
61.8
–
66.3
157.7
14.9
5.2

Depreciation of property, plant & equipment (note 11) for discontinued operations was £nil (2018: £2.7m) and amortisation of intangible assets 
(note 12) was £nil (2018: £1.0m).

Research & development costs
Research & development costs for continuing operations amount to £34.3m (2018: £37.3m) of which £32.3m (2018: £34.4m) was charged directly 
to cost of sales in the income statement and £2.0m (2018: £2.9m) was capitalised (note 12). Research & development costs for discontinued 
operations amounted to £1.8m (2018: £4.7m) of which £1.8m (2018: £4.5m) was charged to cost of sales in the income statement and £nil 
(2018: £0.2m) was capitalised (note 12).

Leases
Minimum lease payments for continuing operations under operating leases recognised as an expense in 2018 were £53.6m. In 2019, expenses 
for short-term and low value leases, variable lease payments not included in lease liabilities and income from sub-leasing right-of-use asset leases 
amount to £16.5m (note 11).

Employee benefits expense
Wages & salaries
Social security costs
Pension costs
  Defined benefit plans
  Defined contribution plans
Share-based payments – equity settled transactions (note 27)

Details of Directors’ remuneration is disclosed in note 28.

The average monthly number of people employed by the Company and its subsidiaries is as follows:
Minerals
ESCO
Oil & Gas
Group companies

2019
£m

609.6
50.6

1.0
27.1
12.9
701.2

2018
£m

550.4
40.0

7.4
23.4
8.6
629.8

2019
Number

2018
Number

8,630
2,338
2,905
470
14,343

8,562
2,444
3,100
420
14,526

The following disclosures are given in relation to total operations.

At 31 December 2019, the number of people employed by the Group and including those under temporary contracts was 14,687 (2018: 17,515).

Auditors’ remuneration
The total fees payable by the Group to our auditors for work performed in respect of the audit and other services 
provided to the Company and its subsidiary companies during the year are disclosed below
Fees payable to the Company's auditor for the audit of the Company and Consolidated Financial Statements
Fees payable to the Company's auditor for other services
  The audit of the Company's subsidiaries
  Audit-related assurance services

2019
£m

2018
£m

2.2

1.1
0.1

2.5

1.3
0.4

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

159

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

5. EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS & INTANGIBLES AMORTISATION

Recognised in arriving at operating profit from continuing operations
Intangibles amortisation (note 12)
Exceptional item – Oil & Gas North America impairment – intangibles and goodwill (note 12)
Exceptional item – Oil & Gas North America impairment – tangible assets (notes 11 & 16)
Exceptional item – other intangibles impairment (note 12)
Exceptional item – ESCO inventory unwind
Exceptional item – ESCO acquisition and integration related costs
Exceptional item – legacy product warranty
Exceptional item – restructuring and rationalisation charges
Exceptional item – pension equalisation (note 23)
Exceptional item – legal claims
Exceptional item – fair value adjustment to contingent consideration asset/liability

Recognised in arriving at operating profit from discontinued operations
Intangibles amortisation (note 12)
Exceptional item – intangibles impairment (note 12)
Exceptional item – disposal related costs
Exceptional item – restructuring charges
Exceptional item – legal claims
Exceptional item – related to prior disposal

2019
£m

(78.3)
(472.9)
(73.3)
(6.3)
–
(10.7)
(2.3)
(30.8)
–
0.3
–
(674.3)

–
–
–
(0.4)
–
–
(0.4)

2018
£m

(66.3)
–
–
(3.1)
(63.1)
(30.8)
(24.4)
(29.2)
(6.3)
(0.7)
(0.1)
(224.0)

(1.0)
(45.0)
(5.0)
0.1
(2.0)
0.3
(52.6)

Continuing operations
Due to challenging current market conditions in the North American oil and gas market and uncertainty over the timing of market recovery, an 
impairment totalling £546.2m has been recognised within the Oil & Gas North America Cash Generating Unit (CGU). A review was performed 
of the carrying value of specific ‘at-risk’ tangible and intangible assets within the CGU resulting in write-downs to inventory of £48.6m, 
property, plant & equipment of £24.7m, brand names of £39.7m, customer relationships of £144.3m and purchased software of £0.9m. 
Following completion of the review, testing was completed in respect of the remaining goodwill and intangible assets held in the CGU leading to 
an additional impairment of £288.0m charged against goodwill.

Exceptional items in the year for continuing operations include costs of £10.7m associated with the integration of ESCO into the Group following 
the acquisition in July 2018. The majority of costs relate to restructuring activities and project support staff costs. These costs are in line with 
estimates made at the time of acquisition. The integration activities and associated costs are expected to complete during the year ended 
31 December 2020.

An additional inventory provision of £2.3m was incurred in the year to reflect the final closing inventory position relating to the prior year Oil & Gas 
legacy product warranty issue. 

The total restructuring charge of £30.8m relates to strategic restructuring and rationalisation activities in Minerals of £17.8m and Oil & Gas of 
£14.6m partially offset by credits of £1.6m in Minerals relating to prior year unutilised provisions and property disposals. The Minerals charge 
relates to costs of £2.0m associated with political and social events in South America and £15.8m following withdrawal from the lower margin 
sand and aggregates comminution market in North America including £9.4m inventory and £2.4m total property, plant & equipment impairments. 
A charge of £6.3m is also included within intangibles impairment for the full write-down of customer relationships asset value which relates to 
the North American sand and aggregates market. The Oil & Gas charges relate to restructuring efforts in response to current challenging market 
conditions in North America. Efforts include a c.20% reduction in the workforce and a number of strategic initiatives which mainly cover the costs 
and associated total property, plant & equipment impairments of £3.9m to consolidate and close a number of sites.

The legal claim credit of £0.3m is for the successful resolution of a legal claim associated with legacy Trio issues.

In the prior year, exceptional items comprised costs associated with the acquisition and integration of ESCO totalling £30.8m and an unwind to 
the inventory fair value uplift in the ESCO opening balance sheet of £63.1m, Oil & Gas legacy product warranty issue of £24.4m and restructuring 
and rationalisation charges of £29.2m relating to actions in Minerals North America and China as well as the exit from the Minerals Malaysia 
foundry operations. Other exceptional charges included £6.3m in relation to UK pension GMP equalisation and £0.8m for legacy legal claims and 
finalisation of contingent consideration. 

Discontinued operations
Exceptional items in the current year, before tax and the loss on sale, of £0.4m relate to the impairment of inventory due to restructuring. In 2018, 
exceptional items included the write down to Flow Control’s carrying value of £45.0m to reflect the agreed transaction enterprise value less 
future costs to sell. A further £5.0m of disposal related costs was incurred along with legal claims of £2.0m partially offset by £0.4m for a receipt 
in relation to a prior year disposal and a net release of an exceptional provision. 

160

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

6. FINANCE (COSTS) INCOME
The following disclosures are given in relation to continuing operations.

Finance costs

Interest payable on financial liabilities
Interest and finance charges payable on lease liabilities
Change in fair value of forward points in cross currency swaps and forward contracts
Finance charges related to committed loan facilities
Finance charges related to discounting of trade receivables
Other finance costs – retirement benefits

Finance income

Interest receivable on financial assets

7. TAX EXPENSE
Income tax credit (expense) from total operations

Consolidated Income Statement
Current income tax
UK corporation tax 
Adjustments in respect of previous years
UK corporation tax
Foreign tax 
Adjustments in respect of previous years
Total current income tax

Deferred income tax
Origination & reversal of temporary differences
Adjustment to estimated recoverable deferred tax assets
Effect of changes in tax rates
Adjustments in respect of previous years
Total deferred tax*

Total income tax credit (expense) in the Consolidated Income Statement
Total income tax credit (expense) is attributable to:
Profit (loss) from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations

* 

Includes £84.9m of deferred tax credit relating to foreign tax (2018: £35.3m credit).

The total income tax (expense) credit is disclosed in the Consolidated Income Statement, and note 8, as follows.

Tax (expense) credit
  – continuing operations before exceptional items & intangibles amortisation
  – discontinued operations before exceptional items & intangibles amortisation
  – exceptional items
  – intangibles amortisation and impairment
Total income tax credit (expense) in the Consolidated Income Statement

The total deferred tax included in the income tax expense is detailed in note 22.

161

2019
£m
(37.4)
(7.6)
(1.6)
(1.9)
(0.6)
(4.8)
(53.9)

2019
£m
4.3

2019
£m

1.8
(5.9)
(4.1)
(87.7)
6.5
(85.3)

86.4
(3.9)
(3.0)
10.0
89.5

4.2

18.4
(14.2)
4.2

2019
£m

(73.8)
(0.5)
11.2
67.3
4.2

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

2018
£m
(34.8)
–
–
(1.3)
(0.3)
(4.3)
(40.7)

2018
£m
2.7

2018
£m

3.5
(1.3)
2.2
(71.3)
(3.5)
(72.6)

33.7
0.8
(1.8)
2.2
34.9

(37.7)

(32.7)
(5.0)
(37.7)

2018
£m

(78.6)
(6.3)
31.4
15.8
(37.7)

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

7. TAX EXPENSE continued
Tax relating to items charged or credited to equity from continuing operations

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Deferred tax – origination & reversal of temporary differences
Deferred tax – effect of change in tax rates
Tax credit (debit) on actuarial losses on retirement benefits
Tax (debit) credit on hedge losses
Tax credit (charge) in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Deferred tax on share-based payments
Tax credit (charge) in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

2019
£m

1.0
(0.2)
0.8
(0.2)
0.6

0.4
0.4

2018
£m

(10.1)
1.2
(8.9)
3.0
(5.9)

(1.7)
(1.7)

Reconciliation of the total tax charge from continuing operations
The tax credit (2018: debit) in the Consolidated Income Statement for the year is lower (2018: higher) than the weighted average of standard rates 
of corporation tax across the Group of 20.0% (2018: 37.2%). The differences are reconciled below.

(Loss) profit before tax from continuing operations 
Loss before tax from discontinued operations 
(Loss) profit before tax

At the weighted average of standard rates of corporation tax across the Group of 20.0% (2018: 37.2%)
Adjustments in respect of previous years – current tax 
– deferred tax

Joint ventures
Unrecognised deferred tax assets
Overseas tax on unremitted earnings
Permanent differences
Tax effect of funding overseas operations
Effect of changes in tax rates
Exceptional items ineligible for tax
At effective tax rate of 1.1% (2018: 67.2%)

2019
£m
(371.8)
(11.8)
(383.6)

(76.7)
(0.6)
(10.0)
(1.3)
10.9
3.1
0.6
(7.7)
0.7
76.8
(4.2)

2018
£m
86.1
(30.0)
56.1

20.9
4.8
(2.2)
(0.4)
8.0
(4.2)
6.4
(9.8)
(0.4)
14.6
37.7

The decrease in permanent differences from a £6.4m addition in 2018 to a £0.6m addition in 2019 arises in part because of the release of tax 
risk provisions in 2019 following the resolution of tax authority enquiries in various jurisdictions including Canada and Australia, together with 
increased R&D credits in the US. The increase in the deferred tax adjustment in respect of prior years from a credit of (£2.2m) in 2018 to a credit 
of (£10.0m) in 2019 primarily relates to a Research and Development claim within the US business, spanning a number of years, the benefit of 
which is deferred for US tax purposes.

Exceptional items ineligible for tax includes the impact of a £288.0m impairment to Goodwill relating to US Oil & Gas Division.

The Group’s provision for overseas tax on unremitted earnings increased from a deduction of (£4.2m) in 2018 to an addition of £3.1m in 2019. 
This is due to the non-recurrence of the 2018 release of provision in relation to unremitted earnings in Canada following repatriation of funds 
through long-term loans from the Canadian entities to the UK group, together with an increase in 2019 of the provision in respect of unremitted 
earnings in Chile and Peru.

On 25 April 2019 the European Commission (EC) released its full decision in relation to its State Aid investigation into the Group Financing 
Exemption (GFE) included within the UK’s controlled foreign company (CFC) legislation. While it is narrower than the original concerns raised and 
confirms that the CFC legislation as amended with effect from 1 January 2019 is compliant with EU State Aid rules, the decision concludes that, 
up to 31 December 2018, aspects of the legislation constitute State Aid. In common with other international groups, the Group has benefited 
from the GFE contained within the CFC legislation and may therefore be affected by the decision should it ultimately be upheld. The estimated 
maximum contingent liability, excluding interest, is approximately £19m. 

The UK Government, together with a number of affected taxpayers, including the Group, have lodged annulment applications with the General 
Court of the European Union in response to this decision and there remains considerable uncertainty as to the outcome of both the appeals 
process and any recovery mechanism. The Group considers that no provision is required in respect of this issue at present and will continue to 
review this position.

162

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

8. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On 19 April 2018, the Group announced its intention to sell the Flow Control Division and, in line with IFRS 5 ‘Non-current Assets Held for Sale 
and Discontinued Operations’, the Group classified the division as held for sale. Whilst part of the Group, the Flow Control Division designed and 
manufactured valves and pumps as well as providing specialist support services to the global power generation, industrial and oil and gas sectors.

The Group disposed of the Flow Control Division on 28 June 2019 for an enterprise value of £275.0m and a net consideration of £263.4m, 
after customary working capital and debt-like adjustments. In January 2020 the Group paid £4.5m to First Reserve and wrote off £0.2m 
receivable from First Reserve to reflect the final consideration of £258.7m determined as part of the agreed completion accounts 
process. Previously reported as an individual reporting segment, the results of the division are presented in the financial statements as 
discontinued operations.

Financial information relating to discontinued operations for the period to the date of disposal is set out in the table below.

Financial performance and cash flow information for discontinued operations

Year ended 31 December 2019

Year ended 31 December 2018

Revenue
Operating (loss) profit
Finance costs
Finance income
(Loss) profit before tax from discontinued operations
Tax (expense) credit
(Loss) profit after tax from discontinued operations
Loss on sale of the subsidiaries after income tax 
(see below) 
(Loss) profit for the period from discontinued 
operations
Reclassification of foreign currency translation reserve
Other comprehensive expense from discontinued 
operations
Net other comprehensive expense from discontinued 
operations

Before 
exceptional 
items & 
intangibles 
amortisation
£m
150.0
(2.9)
(0.5)
–
(3.4)
(0.5)
(3.9)

Exceptional 
items & 
intangibles 
amortisation 
(note 5)
£m
–
(0.4)
–
–
(0.4)
–
(0.4)

Before 
exceptional 
items & 
intangibles 
amortisation
£m
342.7
22.9
(0.4)
0.1
22.6
(6.3)
16.3

Exceptional
items & 
intangibles 
amortisation 
(note 5)
£m
–
(52.6)
–
–
(52.6)
1.3
(51.3)

Total
£m
150.0
(3.3)
(0.5)
–
(3.8)
(0.5)
(4.3)

–

(21.7)

(21.7)

(3.9)
(20.5)

(0.2)

(20.7)

(22.1)
–

–

–

(26.0)
(20.5)

(0.2)

(20.7)

–

16.3
–

–

–

–

(51.3)
–

–

–

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Total
£m
342.7
(29.7)
(0.4)
0.1
(30.0)
(5.0)
(35.0)

–

(35.0)
–

–

–

Cash flows from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in cash & cash equivalents from discontinued operations

Year ended 
31 December 
2019
£m
(29.0)
(7.5)
(2.2)
(38.7)

Year ended 
31 December 
2018
£m
38.7
(5.9)
(0.9)
31.9

163

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

8. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS continued
Details of the sale of the subsidiaries

Consideration received
  Cash received
  Completion accounts
Total disposal consideration
Carrying amount of net assets sold
Costs of disposal
Loss on sale before income tax and reclassification of foreign currency translation reserve
Reclassification of foreign currency translation reserve
Loss on sale before income tax 
Income tax charge
Loss on sale after income tax

The carrying amount of assets and liabilities as at the date of sale were as follows.

Property, plant & equipment
Intangible assets
Inventories
Trade & other receivables
Cash & short-term deposits
Trade & other payables
Provisions
Net assets
Non-controlling interest
Net assets attributable to Equity holders of the Company

Loss per share
Loss per share from discontinued operations was as follows.

Basic
Diluted

Year ended 
31 December 
2019
£m

263.4
(4.7)
258.7
(270.1)
(17.1)
(28.5)
20.5
(8.0)
(13.7)
(21.7)

Period ended 
28 June 2019
£m
95.7
98.4
79.1
150.7
2.1
(140.5)
(14.9)
270.6
(0.5)
270.1

Year ended 
31 December 
2018
£m
75.9
98.8
71.2
132.4
16.1
(118.6)
(15.4)
260.4
(0.5)
259.9

2019
pence
(10.0)
(10.0)

2018
pence
(14.3)
(14.3)

These loss per share figures were derived by dividing the net profit attributable to equity holders of the Company from discontinued operations 
by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, for both basic and diluted amounts, shown in note 9.

9. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic earnings (loss) per share amounts are calculated by dividing net profit (loss) for the year attributable to equity holders of the Company 
by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the 
net profit (loss) attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year, 
adjusted for the effect of dilutive share awards.

The following reflects the earnings (loss) and share data used in the calculation of earnings (loss) per share.

(Loss) profit attributable to equity holders of the Company
  Total operations* (£m)
  Continuing operations** (£m)
  Continuing operations before exceptional items & intangibles amortisation** (£m)
Weighted average share capital
Basic earnings (loss) per share (number of shares, million)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share (number of shares, million)

2019

2018

(379.9)
(353.9)
228.2

259.5
261.2

18.0
53.0
231.1

244.1
245.8

164

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

9. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE continued
The difference between the weighted average share capital for the purposes of the basic and the diluted earnings (loss) per share calculations is 
analysed as follows.

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for basic earnings (loss) per share
Effect of dilution: employee share awards
Adjusted weighted average number of ordinary shares for diluted earnings (loss) per share

2019
Shares 
million
259.5
1.7
261.2

2018
Shares 
million
244.1
1.7
245.8

The profit (loss) attributable to equity holders of the Company used in the calculation of both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from 
continuing operations before exceptional items and intangibles amortisation is calculated as follows.

Net (loss) profit attributable to equity holders from continuing operations**
Exceptional items & intangibles amortisation net of tax
Net profit attributable to equity holders from continuing operations before exceptional items & intangibles 
amortisation

2019
£m
(353.9)
582.1

2018
£m
53.0
178.1

228.2

231.1

Basic (loss) earnings per share:
  Total operations*
  Continuing operations**
  Continuing operations before exceptional items & intangibles amortisation**

Diluted (loss) earnings per share:
  Total operations*
  Continuing operations**
  Continuing operations before exceptional items & intangibles amortisation**

2019
pence

(146.4)
(136.4)
87.9

(146.4)
(136.4)
87.4

*  Adjusted for a profit of £0.5m (2018: profit of £0.4m) in respect of non-controlling interests for total operations.

** Adjusted for a profit of £0.5m (2018: profit of £0.4m) in respect of non-controlling interests for continuing operations.

There have been no share options (2018: nil) exercised between the reporting date and the date of signing of these financial statements.

Loss per share from discontinued operations is disclosed in note 8.

10. DIVIDENDS PAID & PROPOSED

Declared & paid during the year
Equity dividends on ordinary shares
Final dividend for 2018: 30.45p (2017: 29.0p)
Interim dividend for 2019: 16.5p (2018: 15.75p)

2019
£m

78.9
42.8
121.7

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

2018
pence

7.4
21.7
94.7

7.3
21.6
94.0

2018
£m

69.9
40.9
110.8

Proposed for approval by Shareholders at the Annual General Meeting
Final dividend for 2019: 30.45p (2018: 30.45p)

79.1

79.0

Up until May 2018, The Weir Group PLC Scrip Dividend Scheme allowed Shareholders on record the opportunity to elect to receive dividends 
in the form of new fully paid ordinary shares. In 2018, participation in the Scheme resulted in shares with a value of £31.2m being issued and a 
cash dividend of £38.7m for the 2017 final dividend. The 2018 interim and final dividends were only issued in cash following closure of the Scrip 
Dividend Scheme.

The proposed dividend is based on the number of shares in issue, excluding treasury shares held, at the date that the financial statements were 
approved and authorised for issue. The final dividend may differ due to increases or decreases in the number of shares in issue between the date 
of approval of this Annual Report and Financial Statements and the record date for the final dividend.

Dividends have been maintained in the year with dividend cover of 1.9 times (2018: 2.1 times) as explained in the Financial Review.

165

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

11. PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT
Property, plant & equipment comprises owned and right-of-use assets that do not meet the definition of investment property.

Owned land 
& buildings
£m

Owned plant 
& equipment
£m

Total owned 
property, 
plant & 
equipment
£m

Right-of-
use land & 
buildings
£m

Right-of-
use plant & 
equipment
£m

Total right-of-
use property, 
plant & 
equipment
£m

Total 
property, 
plant & 
equipment
£m

Cost
At 31 December 2017
Additions
Acquisitions
Disposals
Reclassifications from intangible assets 
(note 12)
Reclassifications to inventory
Reclassifications
Transferred to assets held for sale (note 8)
Exchange adjustment
At 31 December 2018
Transfer to right-of-use asset
Transition adjustment (note 2)
At 1 January 2019
Additions
Disposals
Reclassifications to intangible assets 
(note 12)
Reclassifications to inventory
Reclassifications 
Reassessments and modifications
Exchange adjustment
At 31 December 2019
Accumulated depreciation & impairment
At 31 December 2017
Depreciation charge for the year*
Impairment during the year
Disposals
Reclassifications
Transferred to assets held for sale (note 8)
Exchange adjustment
At 31 December 2018
Transfer to right-of-use asset
At 1 January 2019
Depreciation charge for the year
Impairment during the year
Disposals
Reclassifications 
Reassessments and modifications
Exchange adjustment
At 31 December 2019

Net book value at 31 December 2017

Net book value at 31 December 2018

Net book value at 31 December 2019

* 

Includes depreciation in relation to discontinued operations of £2.7m.

208.5
3.9
35.6
(0.9)

–
–
(0.8)
(60.8)
3.7
189.2
–
–
189.2
5.6
(6.0)

–
–
1.1
–
(7.8)
182.1

53.5
7.4
4.8
(0.9)
(0.4)
(16.2)
1.3
49.5
–
49.5
6.4
1.4
(3.1)
0.3
–
(2.3)
52.2

155.0

139.7

129.9

657.3
79.2
66.5
(35.9)

0.4
(0.6)
0.8
(91.5)
12.5
688.7
(4.1)
–
684.6
86.9
(75.4)

(3.8)
(0.1)
(1.1)
–
(30.5)
660.6

419.0
57.1
8.8
(31.7)
0.4
(60.2)
7.9
401.3
(1.7)
399.6
56.0
26.6
(65.0)
(0.3)
–
(19.9)
397.0

238.3

287.4

263.6

166

865.8
83.1
102.1
(36.8)

0.4
(0.6)
–
(152.3)
16.2
877.9
(4.1)
–
873.8
92.5
(81.4)

(3.8)
(0.1)
–
–
(38.3)
842.7

472.5
64.5
13.6
(32.6)
–
(76.4)
9.2
450.8
(1.7)
449.1
62.4
28.0
(68.1)
–
–
(22.2)
449.2

393.3

427.1

393.5

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–
–
–
149.2
149.2
34.4
–

–
–
(0.1)
3.4
(5.2)
181.7

–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
30.3
2.5
–
–
–
(1.1)
31.7

–

–

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–
–
4.1
27.7
31.8
12.5
(1.1)

–
–
0.1
(2.4)
(1.3)
39.6

–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1.7
1.7
12.1
–
(1.1)
–
(0.5)
(0.3)
11.9

–

–

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–
–
4.1
176.9
181.0
46.9
(1.1)

–
–
–
1.0
(6.5)
221.3

–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1.7
1.7
42.4
2.5
(1.1)
–
(0.5)
(1.4)
43.6

–

–

150.0

27.7

177.7

865.8
83.1
102.1
(36.8)

0.4
(0.6)
–
(152.3)
16.2
877.9
–
176.9
1,054.8
139.4
(82.5)

(3.8)
(0.1)
–
1.0
(44.8)
1,064.0

472.5
64.5
13.6
(32.6)
–
(76.4)
9.2
450.8
–
450.8
104.8
30.5
(69.2)
–
(0.5)
(23.6)
492.8

393.3

427.1

571.2

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Owned property, plant & equipment
Finance leases are now recorded as ‘right-of-use assets’ in accordance with IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. The prior year balances transferred to right-of-use 
assets for continuing operations are included in the analysis table above. In 2018 the carrying value of discontinued operations included buildings 
held under finance leases of £0.7m and plant & equipment of £0.1m.

The carrying amount of assets under construction included in plant & equipment for continuing operations is £49.6m (2018: £30.4m). 
Discontinued operations include assets under construction in plant & equipment of £nil (2018: £1.4m).

The impairment charges in the year primarily relate to the Oil & Gas Division with £24.7m in relation to the North America Cash Generating Unit 
asset review and £3.3m for strategic restructuring and rationalisation initiatives to consolidate and close sites. In Minerals, an impairment of 
£0.5m for the exit from the North American sand and aggregates market is offset by reversal of £0.5m on disposal of a property in Weir Malaysia 
which was impaired in the prior year. See note 5 for further details.

The majority of impairment charges during 2018 were related to Weir Minerals Malaysia with buildings impairment of £4.8m and equipment 
impairment of £7.6m.

Right-of-use assets
The Group leases many assets including buildings, vehicles, forklifts, photocopiers and printers, machinery and IT equipment. Building lease 
terms are negotiated on an individual basis and contain a wide range of terms from 1–30 years. The average lease term is approximately seven 
years. Plant & equipment lease terms range from 1–7 years, with an average lease term of approximately four years. The current and non-current 
lease liabilities are disclosed in notes 19 and 29 respectively. The maturity analysis of contractual undiscounted cash flows is included in note 29. 
The following table shows the breakdown of the lease expense between amounts charged to operating profit and amounts charged to finance 
costs in the year.

The impairment charge of £2.5m recognised in the year relates to Minerals North America for the exit from the North American sand and 
aggregates market for £1.9m and a restructuring and rationalisation lease write-down in Oil & Gas of £0.6m. See note 5 for further details. 

Depreciation of right-of-use assets
Expenses relating to short-term leases
Expenses relating to leases of low value assets, excluding short-term leases of low value
Income from sub-leasing right-of-use assets 
Expenses relating to variable lease payments not included in the measurement of lease liabilities
Charge to operating profit
Finance cost – interest expense related to lease liabilities 
Charge to profit before tax from continuing operations

2019
£m
(42.4)
(15.1)
(1.7)
0.7
(0.4)
(58.9)
(7.6)
(66.5)

The total cash outflow in the year for continuing operations is £67.4m. Future cash outflows from leases not yet commenced to which the Group 
is committed total £18.2m.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

167

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

12. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Cost
At 31 December 2017
Additions
Acquisitions
Disposals
Reclassifications to property, plant & 
equipment (note 11)
Transferred to assets held for sale 
(note 8)
Exchange adjustment
At 31 December 2018
Additions
Disposals
Reclassifications from property, plant & 
equipment (note 11)
Reclassifications
Exchange adjustment
At 31 December 2019

(107.5)
69.7
1,620.3
–
–

–
–
(63.4)
1,556.9

Accumulated amortisation & impairment
At 31 December 2017
Amortisation charge for the year*
Impairment during the year
Disposals
Transferred to assets held for sale 
(note 8)
Exchange adjustment
At 31 December 2018
Amortisation charge for the year
Impairment during the year
Disposals
Reclassifications
Exchange adjustment
At 31 December 2019

393.2
–
48.1
–

(45.0)
23.9
420.2
–
288.0
–
–
(27.2)
681.0

Goodwill
£m

Brand names
£m

Customer & 
distributor 
relationships
£m

Purchased 
software
£m

Intellectual 
property & 
trade marks
£m

Development 
costs
£m

1,263.5
–
394.6
–

231.7
–
128.6
–

627.1
–
104.6
–

78.6
6.5
3.3
(2.3)

–

–

–

(0.4)

92.8
0.4
40.8
–

–

(1.8)
4.0
136.2
–
(0.1)

–
–
(5.2)
130.9

48.7
10.0
–
–

(0.8)
2.5
60.4
12.8
–
(0.1)
(3.7)
(2.8)
66.6

44.1
75.8
64.3

52.9
3.1
–
–

–

(5.4)
(0.2)
50.4
2.0
(0.7)

–
–
(0.4)
51.3

14.0
8.9
–
–

(3.1)
(0.2)
19.6
8.8
–
(0.4)
–
(0.2)
27.8

38.9
30.8
23.5

Other
£m

25.7
0.6
60.7
–

Total
£m

2,372.3
10.6
732.6
(2.3)

–

(0.4)

(3.5)
2.7
86.2
–
–

–
(2.0)
(3.3)
80.9

23.9
1.3
–
–

–
0.5
25.7
6.2
–
–
(0.9)
(1.1)
29.9

1.8
60.5
51.0

(181.5)
131.2
3,062.5
23.7
(2.8)

3.8
–
(117.1)
2,970.1

821.6
67.3
48.1
(2.3)

(82.7)
43.9
895.9
78.3
479.2
(2.5)
–
(53.8)
1,397.1

1,550.7
2,166.6
1,573.0

(12.0)
17.9
366.2
–
–

–
–
(14.0)
352.2

8.0
2.0
–
–

–
0.8
10.8
1.8
39.7
–
–
(1.8)
50.5

(37.5)
36.6
730.8
–
–

–
–
(27.2)
703.6

290.9
38.3
–
–

(23.0)
15.8
322.0
40.5
150.6
–
3.7
(18.9)
497.9

336.2
408.8
205.7

(13.8)
0.5
72.4
21.7
(2.0)

3.8
2.0
(3.6)
94.3

42.9
6.8
–
(2.3)

(10.8)
0.6
37.2
8.2
0.9
(2.0)
0.9
(1.8)
43.4

35.7
35.2
50.9

Net book value at 31 December 2017
Net book value at 31 December 2018
Net book value at 31 December 2019

870.3
1,200.1
875.9

223.7
355.4
301.7

* 

Includes amortisation in relation to discontinued operations of £1.0m.

The impairment charge recorded in 2019 of £479.2m includes write-downs totalling £472.9m relating to the Oil & Gas North America Cash 
Generating Unit comprising goodwill £288.0m, brand names £39.7m, customer relationships £144.3m and purchased software of £0.9m. 
These charges are a result of current challenging conditions in the North American oil and gas market and uncertainty over the timing of 
market recovery. 

In addition to these balances there was a £6.3m write-off of customer relationships in Trio North America following closure of the sand and 
aggregates business in that region.

During 2018, impairment charges of £48.1m included £45.0m in relation to a write-down of goodwill in discontinued operations and a write-down 
of £3.1m for goodwill associated with the decision to exit the Minerals Division’s Malaysia foundry operations. 

Brand names have been assigned an indefinite useful life and as such are not amortised with the exception of those acquired during 2017 for 
KOP Surface Products. These had a carrying value of £1.9m at 31 December 2018 and were fully amortised during 2019. 

The carrying value of brand names with an indefinite life is tested annually for impairment (note 14). The Seaboard and Mathena brand names 
were impaired during the year for the reasons noted above. There is no impairment charge in the prior year. The carrying value at the year end 
was £301.7m (2018: £355.4m).

168

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

The brand name value includes the brands of ESCO, Linatex, Warman, SPM and Multiflo, all of which are considered to be market leaders in their 
respective markets. The allocation of significant brand names is as follows.

ESCO
Warman
Linatex
Seaboard
SPM

Trio
Gabbioneta
Mathena
Other

Gabbioneta included in assets held for sale
Other brands included in assets held for sale

Brand names

2019
£m
128.6
62.6
43.0
–
41.1

17.9
–
–
8.5
301.7
–
–
301.7

2018
£m
127.8
65.1
44.7
30.4
42.8

18.7
6.1
9.3
22.5
367.4
(6.1)
(5.9)
355.4

The allocation of customer and distributor relationships, and the amortisation period of these assets is as follows.

Remaining amortisation 
period

Customer & distributor 
relationships

ESCO
SPM
Seaboard
Mathena
Novatech

Trio
Other

2019
Years
26–29
12
n/a
n/a
6

2018
Years
27–30
13
9
7
7

5
Up to 11

6
Up to 12

Other customer and distributor relationships included in assets held for sale

n/a

Up to 12

2019
£m
98.8
64.3
–
–
23.2

4.7
14.7
205.7
–
205.7

2018
£m
106.8
75.9
85.2
78.5
29.2

14.2
33.5
423.3
(14.5)
408.8

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

13. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Prior year business combinations
On 12 July 2018, the Group completed the acquisition of ESCO Corporation (‘ESCO’) for an enterprise value of US$1.3bn (£972.3m). In order to 
part fund the acquisition, a placement of 16,699,763 ordinary shares was completed on 23 April 2018, raising £355.5m (net of £7.7m fees). As part 
of the final consideration, a further 16,779,861 ordinary shares were issued directly to ESCO Shareholders on 12 July 2018 valued at £325.3m 
with an additional equity consideration of £1.4m in relation to pre-acquisition cost of share-based payment awards (see note 27). ESCO is the 
world’s leading provider of ground engaging tools for surface mining and infrastructure. 

On 31 July 2018, the Group completed the acquisition of Ralph A. Hiller Company, a manufacturer of certain valve products for use in nuclear 
power facilities, for a consideration of US$4.0m (£3.1m). 

On 18 April 2018, the Group completed a trade and asset purchase of Davidson Sales & Engineering, Inc., a provider of marketing, distributing, 
selling and servicing mining and other industrial equipment, for a consideration of US$4.1m (£2.9m). 

In 2019, the provisional fair values of the opening balance sheets for the acquisitions noted above were finalised following a review over a 
12 month period since the date of acquisition. No adjustments were made to the fair values reported in the 2018 financial statements. 

Contingent consideration of £0.2m at 31 December 2018 relating to the purchase of ESCO was settled in the year, following a reduction in the 
balance of £0.1m due to exchange movements in the year. 

169

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

14. IMPAIRMENT TESTING OF GOODWILL & INTANGIBLE ASSETS WITH INDEFINITE LIVES
Goodwill acquired through business combinations and intangible assets with indefinite lives have been allocated at acquisition to cash generating 
units (CGUs) that are expected to benefit from the business combination. The Group tests goodwill and intangible assets (brand names) with 
indefinite lives annually for impairment, or more frequently if there are indications that these might be impaired.

The carrying amounts of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives have been allocated as per the table below.

Minerals
ESCO
Oil & Gas International
Oil & Gas North America
Continuing operations

Goodwill
2019
£m
363.0
390.3
54.5
68.1
875.9

Intangibles
2019
£m
132.0
128.6
–
41.1
301.7

Goodwill
2018
£m
378.2
406.0
56.7
359.2
1,200.1

Intangibles
2018
£m
137.2
133.8
–
82.5
353.5

Description of CGUs
A description of each of the CGUs is provided below along with a summary of the key drivers of revenue growth and EBITA margin.

Minerals
Minerals includes the Weir Warman, Weir Linatex and Weir Trio brands. Weir Minerals companies supply pumps and associated equipment and 
services to all global mining markets. The key drivers for revenues are (i) levels of mining capital expenditure which drives demand for original 
equipment; and (ii) levels of actual mining activity which drives demand for spare parts and service. Independent forecasts of mining capital 
expenditure and activity have been used to derive revenue growth assumptions. These independent forecasts were prepared during the final 
quarter of 2019. 

ESCO
ESCO includes the ESCO and Bucyrus Blades brands. This CGU is a supplier of ground engaging tools (GET) and associated equipment and 
services to the mining and infrastructure industries. Independent forecasts of expenditure in these sectors have been used to derive revenue 
growth assumptions. These independent forecasts were prepared during the final quarter of 2019.

Oil & Gas International
Oil & Gas International comprises multiple service centre locations within the Middle East and Europe and wellhead locations across a number 
of countries in Asia Pacific. The service centre locations supply services including repair, manufacture and certification of oilfield equipment, to 
a diverse portfolio of customers. The Asia Pacific locations supply surface wellheads, surface trees, valves and actuators as well as providing 
support to customers including installation, maintenance, rental and refurbishment services. The key drivers for revenues are oil and natural gas 
prices. Independent forecasts of these commodity prices have been used to derive revenue growth assumptions. These independent forecasts 
were prepared during the final quarter of 2019.

Oil & Gas North America
Oil & Gas North America includes the Weir SPM brand. This CGU is a supplier of oil and gas well service pumps, wellhead solutions, associated 
flow control equipment and services to the oil and gas production industry. Demand in Oil & Gas North America is closely related to the number 
of conventional and unconventional oil drilling rigs, the number of wells completed and gas well drilling rigs in operation which are in turn 
dependent upon oil and natural gas prices and storage levels. Independent forecasts of North American oil and gas well drilling activity, which 
take into account forecast oil and natural gas prices and storage levels, have been used to derive revenue growth assumptions during the final 
quarter of 2019.

Impairment testing assumptions
Impairment testing requires an estimate of the value in use of the CGUs to which the goodwill and intangible assets are allocated. To estimate 
the value in use, the Group estimates the expected future cash flows from the CGU and discounts them to their present value at a determined 
discount rate, which is appropriate for the geographic location of the CGU. Forecasting expected cash flows and selecting an appropriate discount 
rate inherently requires estimation.

170

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

The basis of the impairment tests for the four CGUs, including key assumptions, are set out in the table below.

CGU

Basis of valuation Period of forecast Discount rate1

Real growth2

Minerals

Value in use

5 years

11.4% (2018: 15.2%) 1.2% (2018: 1.2%)

ESCO

Value in use

5 years

10.6% (2018: 14.6%) 1.2% (2018: 1.2%)

Oil & Gas International

Value in use

5 years

9.8% (2018: 14.5%) 1.2% (2018: 1.2%)

Oil & Gas North America Value in use

5 years

12.4% (2018: 14.6%) 0.0% (2018: 1.2%)

Key assumptions3
Revenue growth 
EBITA margins
Revenue growth 
EBITA margins
Revenue growth 
EBITA margins
Revenue growth 
EBITA margins

Source
External forecast 
Historic experience
External forecast 
Historic experience
External forecast 
Historic experience
External forecast 
Historic experience

1 

2 

3 

 Discount rate 
The pre-tax nominal weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is the basis for the discount rate, with adjustments made, as appropriate, for geographic risk. The WACC is the weighted average 
of the pre-tax cost of debt financing and the pre-tax cost of equity finance. The overall discount rates for the majority of countries have decreased due to reductions in the bond yields and 
industry asset betas, albeit the latter remained consistent for the Oil & Gas North America CGU. 

 Real growth 
For three of the CGUs the real growth beyond the five-year forecast period has been held consistent with the prior year at 1.2% (2018: 1.2%), reflecting the increasingly global nature of these 
businesses, the long-term growth prospects in their end markets and the fact that they sell a significant proportion of their products to emerging markets which also have strong long-term 
growth prospects. The real growth rate for the Oil & Gas North America CGU was reduced to nil (2018: 1.2%) to reflect the current market outlook and uncertain timing of recovery.

 EBITA margins 
EBITA margins have been forecast based on historic levels taking cognisance of the likely impact of changing economic environments and competitive landscapes on volumes and revenues, 
and the impact of associated management actions.

Impairment testing and sensitivity analysis
The challenging current market conditions in the North American oil and gas market and uncertainty over the timing of market recovery has had 
a substantial impact on the long-term forecast cash flows for our Oil & Gas North America CGU. This led to a specific review of the carrying 
value of assets within the CGU and the impairment of both tangible and intangible assets as reflected in note 5. This included the impairment of 
specific indefinite life intangible assets (brand names) totalling £39.7m. 

Subsequent to these asset impairments the testing of the remaining goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives indicated an impairment 
charge of £288.0m, resulting in a recoverable amount for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives of £109.2m based on the value in 
use. The full impairment charge has been allocated against goodwill.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

At the balance sheet date, the estimated recoverable amount of the Oil & Gas North America CGU is equal to its carrying value. 
Consequently any adverse change in assumptions would, in isolation, cause further impairment loss to be recognised.

The discount rate has reduced 220bps in 2019 primarily as a result of low bond yields. An increase in the discount rate of 100bps would lead to an 
increase in the impairment recognised of £49m. A reduction in the terminal growth rate by 100bps would lead to a further impairment of £39m.

Long-term future cash flows included in the impairment analysis reflect recent results and assume the market conditions seen through 2019 
endure for longer. If these assumptions for future periods did not materialise or performance worsened then a further impairment could result.

As explained in other sections of this Annual Report (but specifically in the Financial Review on page 32), the Group has already reacted to 
market conditions through the implementation of the Oil & Gas restructuring and rationalisation actions and management continue to review the 
operational structure and business model to ensure we remain well placed to fully respond to the current market, while remaining prepared for 
any upturn. 

The Directors consider that the assumptions made represent their best estimate of the future cash flows generated by the CGU, and that the 
discount rate used is appropriate given the risks associated with the specific cash flows. It is considered appropriate to disclose this as an area of 
significant estimation due to the size of the balance, the relatively low discount rates compared to recent years and the current levels of market 
uncertainty which could reasonably lead to changes in the carrying value as a result of future events within the next five years.

Forecasts for the Minerals, ESCO and Oil & Gas International CGUs show significant headroom above carrying value. No sensitivity analysis has 
been undertaken for these CGUs as there is no reasonable possible change in key assumptions that would cause the carrying values to exceed 
recoverable amounts.

171

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

15. INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES
The Group holds investments in five joint ventures as follows.

At 31 December 2017
Acquisitions
Disposals
Share of results
Share of dividends
Exchange adjustment
At 31 December 2018
Share of results
Share of dividends
Exchange adjustment
At 31 December 2019

Details of the Group’s share of the balance sheet, revenue and profit of its joint ventures are given below.

Share of joint ventures' balance sheets
Goodwill
Current assets
Non-current assets
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Net assets
Share of joint ventures’ revenue & profits
Revenue
Cost of sales
Selling & distribution costs
Administrative expenses
Income tax expense
Interest
Profit after tax

£m
19.2
15.8
–
2.4
(1.6)
0.8
36.6
6.2
(3.5)
(2.7)
36.6

2018
£m

4.1
28.0
16.8
(9.8)
(2.5)
36.6

29.1
(21.7)
(2.8)
(1.8)
(0.4)
–
2.4

2019
£m

4.0
27.0
17.2
(8.7)
(2.9)
36.6

44.7
(33.5)
(2.1)
(1.5)
(1.3)
(0.1)
6.2

The acquisition during 2018 relates to the Group’s investment in a joint venture acquired as part of ESCO on 12 July 2018. The Group’s 
investments in joint ventures are listed on page 216.

16. INVENTORIES

Raw materials
Work in progress
Finished goods

2019
£m
76.3
54.0
512.6
642.9

2018
£m
125.0
71.2
496.5
692.7

In 2019, the cost of inventories recognised as an expense within cost of sales amounted to £1,787.7m (2018: £1,633.0m). In 2019, the 
write-down of inventories to net realisable value amounted to £66.7m (2018: £13.7m), and the reversal of previous write-downs amounted 
to £21.5m (2018: £27.4m). The write-down included £48.6m due to uncertainty in the market outlook for Oil & Gas North America and £9.4m 
(2018: £4.8m) for Group restructuring actions in Minerals following the exit from the North American sand and aggregates market. A further 
£2.3m (2018: £7.5m) was recognised in relation to warranty issues in Oil & Gas, as disclosed in note 5. There was no impact as at 31 December 
2018 from the fair value uplift in ESCO (note 5) as this was fully unwound in 2018.

172

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

17. TRADE & OTHER RECEIVABLES
Other receivables presented as non-current on the face of the Consolidated Balance Sheet of £77.1m (2018: £78.5m) are primarily in respect of 
insurance contracts, including Trust Owned Life Insurance policy investments which provide a form of security for certain unfunded employee 
benefit plans operated by ESCO, and insurance contracts relating to asbestos-related claims in the USA of £36.4m (2018: £39.0m). Further detail 
on these claims is presented in note 21.

Current trade & other receivables are analysed in the following table.

Trade receivables
Loss allowance

Other debtors
Sales tax receivable
Prepayments
Contract assets

2019
£m
454.6
(14.4)
440.2
26.7
18.8
50.8
21.4
557.9

2018
£m
501.5
(18.2)
483.3
41.5
12.4
35.4
25.1
597.7

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

The average credit period on sales of goods is 60 days (2018: 66 days excluding ESCO). Other debtors includes £2.1m (2018: £2.6m) in respect of 
amounts due from joint ventures, and £7.0m (2018: £9.1m) in respect of insurance contracts relating to asbestos-related claims made in the USA 
(note 21).

Impairment of trade & other receivables
The Group has two types of financial assets that are subject to IFRS 9’s expected credit loss model:

i)  trade receivables for sales of products and services; and
ii)  contract assets relating to construction contracts.

The Group applies the IFRS 9 simplified approach to measuring expected credit losses, which uses a lifetime expected loss allowance for all 
trade receivables and contract assets. To measure the expected credit losses, trade receivables and contract assets have been grouped based 
on shared credit risk characteristics.

The contract assets relate to unbilled work in progress and have substantially the same risk characteristics as the trade receivables for the 
same types of contracts. Due to the way in which these contracts are managed, expected credit loss is included within the loss allowance for 
trade receivables.

Due to the diverse end markets and customer geographies within the Group, the methodology applied to arrive at the expected loss rate is 
dictated by local circumstances. For short-term trade receivables, historical loss rates might be an appropriate basis for the estimate of expected 
future losses. These are then adjusted to reflect current and forward-looking information on macroeconomic factors affecting the ability of the 
customers to settle the receivables. As such, one methodology applied is the use of a provision matrix, where different loss rates are applied 
depending on the number of days that a trade receivable is past due. Alternatively the expected credit loss is calculated on an individual customer 
basis based on historical loss data for that customer, their receivables ageing, and any other knowledge of the customer’s current and forecast 
financial position.

Trade receivables and contract assets are written-off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery.

Impairment losses on trade receivables and contract assets are presented as net impairment losses within operating profit. 
Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against the same line item.

The gross carrying amount of trade receivables, for which the loss allowance is measured at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit 
losses under the simplified method, is analysed below.

Analysis of gross carrying amount of trade receivables by days past due

Not past due
Up to 3 months past due
Between 3 & 6 months past due
More than 6 months past due

2019
£m
310.4
99.8
13.3
31.1
454.6

2018
£m
325.4
112.3
22.5
41.3
501.5

173

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

Reconciliation of opening to closing loss allowance for trade receivables

Balance at the beginning of the year
Transferred to assets held for sale
Impairment losses recognised on receivables
Amounts written-off as uncollectable
Amounts recovered during the year
Impairment losses reversed
Exchange adjustment
Balance at the end of the year

The Group has recognised the following assets in relation to contracts with customers.

Construction contract assets
Accrued income
Total contract assets

2019
£m
(18.2)
–
(4.3)
3.5
1.1
2.7
0.8
(14.4)

2019
£m
12.5
8.9
21.4

2018
£m
(23.6)
7.2
(6.2)
3.4
0.2
1.0
(0.2)
(18.2)

2018
£m
3.2
21.9
25.1

The increase in construction contract assets relates to the increase and timing of costs incurred on large ‘engineer to order’ projects which were 
recognised over time, in advance of billings. The reduction in accrued income in the year is driven by the timing of contract shipments.

18. CASH & SHORT-TERM DEPOSITS

Cash at bank & in hand
Short-term deposits

For the purposes of the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement, cash & cash equivalents comprise the following:
Cash & short-term deposits
Bank overdrafts & short-term borrowings (note 19)
Cash & short-term deposits held for sale
Bank overdrafts & short-term borrowings held for sale

2019
£m
242.3
31.5
273.8

273.8
(1.7)
–
–
272.1

2018
£m
239.2
23.8
263.0

263.0
–
16.1
(1.9)
277.2

Cash at bank & in hand earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates. Short-term deposits are made for varying periods of 
between one day and three months depending on the immediate cash requirements of the Group and earns interest at the respective short-term 
deposit rates.

19. INTEREST-BEARING LOANS & BORROWINGS

Current
Bank overdrafts
Fixed-rate notes
Bank loans
Commercial paper
Obligations under finance leases (note 26)
Lease liabilities

Non-current
Bank loans
Fixed-rate notes
Obligations under finance leases (note 26)
Lease liabilities

174

2019
£m

1.7
–
299.6
190.5
–
42.3
534.1

158.4
595.1
–
142.7
896.2

2018
£m

–
164.3
–
497.2
1.0
–
662.5

120.0
619.4
1.5
–
740.9

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Bank loans
Revolving credit facility
United States Dollar variable rate loans
Sterling variable rate loans
Other
Purchasing cards in discontinued operations
Sterling variable rate term loan
United States Dollar fixed-rate loan facilities

Less: current instalments due on bank loans
Purchasing cards in discontinued operations
Sterling variable rate term loan
Non-current bank loans

Maturity Interest basis

2021 US$ LIBOR
£ LIBOR
2021

2019
2020
2021

2019
2020
–

FIXED
£ LIBOR
FIXED

FIXED
£ LIBOR
–

Commercial paper
Commercial paper
United States Dollar variable rate commercial paper
Euro variable rate commercial paper

Maturity Interest basis

2019 US$ LIBOR
EUR LIBOR
2020

Less: current instalments due on commercial paper
United States Dollar variable rate commercial paper
Euro variable rate commercial paper
Non-current commercial paper

2019 US$ LIBOR
EUR LIBOR
2020

                Weighted average  
               interest rate 

2019
%

2.39
–

–
1.56
7.80

2018
%

–
1.08

24.00
–
–

              Weighted average  
               interest rate 

2019
%

–
0.03

2018
%

3.21
0.05

The weighted average interest rates include an applicable margin over and above the interest basis.

Fixed-rate notes
Private placement
United States Dollar fixed-rate notes
United States Dollar fixed-rate notes
United States Dollar fixed-rate notes

Maturity Interest basis

Fixed interest rate
2018
%

2019
%

2019
2022
2023

FIXED
FIXED
FIXED

–
4.27
4.34

3.69
4.27
4.34

Less: current instalments due on fixed-rate notes
United States Dollar fixed-rate notes
Non-current fixed-rate notes

2019

FIXED

2019
£m

158.3
–

–
299.6
0.1
458.0

–
(299.6)
158.4

2019
£m

–
190.5
190.5

–
(190.5)
–

2019
£m

–
444.6
150.5
595.1

–
595.1

2018
£m

–
120.0

0.3
–
–
120.3

(0.3)
–
120.0

2018
£m

19.6
477.6
497.2

(19.6)
(477.6)
–

2018
£m

164.3
462.7
156.7
783.7

(164.3)
619.4

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

The disclosures above represent the interest profile and currency profile of financial liabilities before the impact of derivative financial instruments.

At 31 December 2019, £158.3m (2018: £120.0m) was drawn under the US$950.0m multi-currency revolving credit facility which matures in two 
tranches between September 2020 and September 2021.

At 31 December 2019, £299.6m (2018: £nil) was drawn under a new term loan facility opened during 2019 and includes unamortised issue costs 
of £0.4m. The term loan facility matures in December 2020. 

At 31 December 2019, a total of £190.5m equivalent (2018: £497.2m equivalent) was outstanding under the Group’s US$1bn commercial 
paper programme.

At 31 December 2019, a total of £595.1m (2018: £783.7m) was outstanding under private placement which includes total unamortised issue 
costs of £0.5m (2018: £0.9m).

175

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

20. TRADE & OTHER PAYABLES

Current
Trade payables
Other creditors
Other taxes & social security costs
Accruals
Contingent consideration payable
Contract liabilities

Non-current
Other payables

2019
£m

306.7
12.7
12.5
191.6
–
66.1
589.6

–
–

2018
£m

347.0
8.9
11.4
216.8
0.2
45.6
629.9

0.8
0.8

Trade payables includes balances due to suppliers that have signed up to a supply chain financing programme, under which all invoices are settled 
via a partner bank. This allows the suppliers to elect on an invoice by invoice basis to receive a discounted early payment from the partner bank 
rather than being paid in line with the agreed payment terms. The value of the liability payable by the Group remains unchanged. The aggregate 
limit of facilities available at 31 December 2019 was £95.0m and may be voluntarily cancelled under bilateral terms of 30 days notice.

The Group assesses the arrangement against indicators to assess if debts which vendors have sold to the partner bank under the supplier 
financing scheme continue to meet the definition of trade payables or should be classified as borrowings. At 31 December 2019 and 
31 December 2018 the payables met the criteria of trade payables and the arrangement had no impact on the results or the financial position of 
the Group.

The Group has recognised the following liabilities in relation to contracts with customers.

Construction contract liabilities
Deferred income
Total contract liabilities

2019
£m
3.7
62.4
66.1

2018
£m
1.4
44.2
45.6

The increase in total contract liabilities in the year primarily relates to an order to provide equipment to the Iron Bridge Magnetite Project in 
Western Australia. 

Revenue recognised in relation to contract liabilities
The following table shows the revenue recognised in the current reporting period related to carried forward contract liabilities. 

Revenue recognised that was included in the contract liability balance at the beginning of the year

2019
£m
26.4

2018
£m
38.9

Transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations
The transaction price allocated to performance obligations unsatisfied at the year end is £124.0m. This relates only to performance obligations 
from contracts with a duration of over a year as permitted by the practical expedient in paragraph 121 of IFRS 15. The prior year comparative has 
not been given as the majority of contracts in 2018 had a duration of one year or less.

The following table shows when revenue is expected to be recognised for unsatisfied performance obligations from contracts with a duration of 
over one year. 

Less than 1 year
After 1 year but not more than 5 years
Total value of performance obligations unsatisfied from contracts with a duration over 1 year

2019
£m
90.8
33.2
124.0

176

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

21. PROVISIONS

At 31 December 2018
Additions
Utilised
Unutilised
Transition adjustment (note 2)
Exchange adjustment
At 31 December 2019

Current 2019
Non-current 2019
At 31 December 2019

Current 2018 
Non-current 2018
At 31 December 2018

Warranties & 
onerous sales 
contracts
£m
21.5
14.4
(18.1)
(3.6)
–
(0.7)
13.5

Asbestos-
related
£m
52.3
7.0
(8.9)
(1.0)
–
(1.8)
47.6

Employee-
related
£m
15.6
14.3
(10.2)
(1.1)
–
(0.8)
17.8

Exceptional 
rationalisation
£m
16.3
26.2
(26.9)
(0.8)
(1.5)
(0.5)
12.8

12.4
1.1
13.5

18.8
2.7
21.5

7.2
40.4
47.6

9.1
43.2
52.3

7.7
10.1
17.8

6.4
9.2
15.6

12.0
0.8
12.8

12.4
3.9
16.3

Other
£m
14.5
0.4
(1.3)
(0.3)
(1.1)
(0.4)
11.8

2.9
8.9
11.8

3.8
10.7
14.5

Total
£m
120.2
62.3
(65.4)
(6.8)
(2.6)
(4.2)
103.5

42.2
61.3
103.5

50.5
69.7
120.2

Warranties & onerous sales contracts
Provision has been made in respect of actual warranty and contract penalty claims on goods sold and services provided, and allowance has been 
made for potential warranty claims based on past experience for goods and services sold with a warranty guarantee. It is expected that all costs 
related to such claims will have been incurred within five years of the balance sheet date.

Provision has been made in respect of sales contracts entered into for the sale of goods in the normal course of business where the unavoidable 
costs of meeting the obligations under the contracts exceed the economic benefits expected to be received from the contracts. Provision is 
made immediately when it becomes apparent that expected costs will exceed the expected benefits of the contract. It is expected that the 
majority of these costs will be incurred within one year of the balance sheet date.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Asbestos-related claims
Certain of the Group’s US-based subsidiaries are co-defendants in lawsuits pending in the US in which plaintiffs are claiming damages arising 
from alleged exposure to products previously manufactured which contained asbestos. The Group has comprehensive insurance cover for cases 
of this nature with all claims directly managed by the Group’s insurers who also meet associated defence costs. The insurers and their legal 
advisers agree and execute the defence strategy between them. Due to the expiration of one of the Group’s insurance policies in the year, which 
provided insurance cover for claims with a post-1980 first date of exposure, the Group has provided £1.0m in the year to reflect the small number 
of claims experienced to date. There are currently no cash flows to or from the Group related to claims with an exposure date pre-1981 due to 
insurance cover, and we expect this to continue for the foreseeable future.

There remains inherent uncertainty associated with estimating future costs in respect of asbestos-related diseases. Actuarial estimates of future 
indemnity and defence costs associated with asbestos-related diseases are subject to significantly greater uncertainty than actuarial estimates 
for other types of exposures. This uncertainty results from factors that are unique to the asbestos claims litigation and settlement process 
including but not limited to: 

i)  the possibility of future state or federal legislation applying to claims for asbestos-related diseases; 
ii)  the ability of the plaintiff’s bar to develop and sustain new legal theory and/or develop new populations of claimants; 
iii)  changes in focus of the plaintiff’s bar; 
iv)  changes in the Group’s defence strategy; and 
v)  changes in the financial condition of other co-defendants in suits naming the Group and affiliated businesses.

A review of both the Group’s expected liability for US asbestos-related diseases and the adequacy of the Group’s insurance policies to meet 
future settlement and defence costs was completed in conjunction with external advisers in 2017 as part of our planned triennial actuarial update. 
This review estimated future claims experience based on an industry standard epidemiological decay model, and Weir’s claims settlement 
history. Due to the inherent uncertainty resulting from the changing nature of the US litigation environment as outlined above, and in conjunction 
with the actuarial review, the Directors consider 10 years (2018: 10 years) of projected claims to provide a reliable estimate of the future liability. 
Confirmation was also received from external advisers that the insurance asset remained sufficient to match the Directors’ best estimate of the 
future liability and therefore a corresponding asset was recognised for insurance proceeds (note 17). 

A review of the claims submitted and those settled during the year confirmed that the actuarial review completed in 2017 remains appropriate 
subject to the additional provision for claims with an exposure date post-1980. As such, the liability provision and corresponding asset have been 
updated accordingly to reflect the nature of the actuarial decay model and the projected claims profile a year further out. A provision of £44.4m 
(2018: £48.1m) represents the Directors’ best estimate of the future liability, with a corresponding asset remaining appropriate.

177

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

There can be no guarantee that the assumptions used to estimate the provision will result in an accurate prediction of the actual costs that may 
be incurred. Sensitivity analysis reflecting reasonably probable scenarios has been conducted. This involved:

increasing/decreasing the number of projected future settled claims and estimated settlement value by 10%; or

i) 
ii)  increasing/decreasing the basis of provision by two years.

Application of these sensitivities would not lead to a material change in the provision.

In the UK, there are outstanding asbestos-related claims which are not the subject of insurance cover. The extent of the UK asbestos exposure 
involves a series of legacy employer’s liability claims which all relate to former UK operations and employment periods in the 1960s and 1970s. 
In 1989 the Group’s employer’s liability insurer (Chester Street Employers Association Ltd) was placed into run-off which effectively generated 
an uninsured liability exposure for all future long-tail disease claims with an exposure period pre-dating 1 January 1972. All claims with a disease 
exposure post 1 January 1972 are fully compensated via the Government-established Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Any settlement 
to a former employee whose service period straddles 1972 is calculated on a pro rata basis. The Group provides for these claims based on 
management’s best estimate of the likely costs given past experience of the volume and cost of similar claims brought against the Group.

The UK provision was reviewed and adjusted accordingly for claims experience in the year, resulting in a provision of £3.2m (2018: £4.2m).

Employee-related
Employee-related provisions arise from legal obligations, the majority of which relate to compensation associated with periods of service.

Exceptional rationalisation
Restructuring and rationalisation charges during the year led to additions of £26.2m which included £5.2m relating to withdrawal from the lower 
margin sand and aggregates comminution market in North America and costs associated with political and social events in South America, 
£10.8m for Oil & Gas restructuring activities and £10.2m for ESCO integration costs. 

The closing provision of £12.8m includes £6.5m which has been retained for costs incurred to date on Oil & Gas restructuring and £2.3m 
for Minerals.

Other
Other provisions include environmental obligations, penalties, duties due, legal claims and other exposures across the Group. These balances 
typically include estimates based on multiple sources of information and reports from third-party advisers. Where certain outcomes are unknown, 
a range of possible scenarios is calculated, with the most likely being reflected in the provision.

178

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

22. DEFERRED TAX

Deferred income tax assets
Post-employment benefits
Decelerated depreciation for tax purposes
Intangible assets
Untaxed reserves
Offset against liabilities
Deferred income tax assets

Deferred income tax assets attributable to:
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations

Deferred income tax liabilities
Accelerated depreciation for tax purposes
Overseas tax on unremitted earnings
Intangible assets
Other temporary differences
Offset against assets
Deferred income tax liabilities

Deferred income tax liabilities attributable to:
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations

2019  
£m

2018  
£m

28.1
1.3
1.0
154.2
(123.4)
61.2

61.2
–
61.2

(11.3)
(9.0)
(131.1)
(1.0)
123.4
(29.0)

(29.0)
–
(29.0)

30.7
7.6
2.4
144.0
(143.0)
41.7

36.0
5.7
41.7

(29.3)
(8.1)
(190.5)
(7.6)
143.0
(92.5)

(92.2)
(0.3)
(92.5)

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Net deferred income tax asset (liability)

32.2

(50.8)

The movement in deferred income tax assets and liabilities during the year was as follows.

At 1 January 2018
Acquisitions
(Charged) credited to the income statement (note 7)
Charged to equity (note 7)
Exchange adjustment
At 31 December 2018
(Charged) credited to the income statement (note 7)
Credited to equity (note 7)
Disposals
Exchange adjustment
At 31 December 2019

Post-
employment 
benefits  
£m
24.3
14.6
(0.2)
(8.8)
0.8
30.7
(2.0)
0.8
(0.8)
(0.6)
28.1

Accelerated 
depreciation 
for tax 
purposes  
£m
(10.1)
(8.6)
(1.6)
–
(1.4)
(21.7)
8.4
–
2.1
1.2
(10.0)

Overseas 
tax on 
unremitted 
earnings  
£m
(15.1)
(1.0)
7.8
–
0.2
(8.1)
(1.6)
–
–
0.7
(9.0)

Untaxed 
reserves 
& other 
temporary 
differences  
£m
95.6
15.1
22.3
(1.4)
4.8
136.4
33.1
0.2
(11.3)
(5.2)
153.2

Intangible 
assets  
£m
(107.3)
(78.4)
6.6
–
(9.0)
(188.1)
51.6
–
4.1
2.3
(130.1)

Total  
£m
(12.6)
(58.3)
34.9
(10.2)
(4.6)
(50.8)
89.5
1.0
(5.9)
(1.6)
32.2

Untaxed reserves primarily relate to temporarily disallowed inventory/receivable provisions and accruals/provisions for liabilities where the tax 
allowance is deferred until the cash expense occurs. 

Deferred tax asset balances for unused tax losses of £21.7m (2018: £25.5m) have not been recognised on the grounds that there is insufficient 
evidence that these assets will be recoverable. These assets will be recovered when future tax charges are sufficient to absorb these tax 
benefits. Deferred tax asset balances for capital losses in the UK amounting to £5.8m (2018: £5.9m) have not been recognised but would be 
available in the event of future capital gains being incurred by the Group.

179

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

22. DEFERRED TAX continued
The net deferred tax asset due after more than one year is £32.2 million (2018: liability of £50.8m).

Temporary differences associated with Group investments
A deferred tax liability of £9.0m (2018: £8.1m) has been recognised in respect of taxes on the unremitted earnings of the South American and 
Canadian subsidiaries. As at 31 December 2019, this is the only recognised deferred tax liability in respect of taxes on unremitted earnings, 
as the Group does not foresee a distribution of unremitted earnings from other subsidiaries or joint ventures which would result in a reversal 
of deferred tax. The temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries and joint ventures, for which a deferred tax liability has 
not been recognised, aggregate to £2,430.7m (2018: £2,254.0m).

There are no income tax consequences attaching to the payment of dividends by the Company to its Shareholders.

UK corporation tax rate changes
Legislation was enacted on 26 October 2015 such that the main rate of UK corporation tax will be 19% from April 2017 and 17% from April 2020. 
Consequently, UK deferred tax has been provided at the prevalent rates during the periods in which the UK temporary differences are expected 
to unwind. Consequently, deferred tax has been provided on UK temporary differences at 17.1% (2018: 17.4%). 

23. PENSIONS & OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Group operates various defined benefit pension plans in the UK and North America. All defined benefit plans are closed to new members. 
The most significant defined benefit plan is the Main funded UK plan.

UK plans
The Group has two funded defined benefit plans (the Main Plan and the Executive Plan) and an unfunded retirement benefit plan for retired 
Executive Directors. The Group also operates a defined contribution plan, the contributions to which are in addition to those set out below, and 
are charged directly to the Consolidated Income Statement. 

For the defined benefit plans, benefits are related to service and final salary. The Main Plan closed to future accrual of benefits effective from 
30 June 2015. 

The weighted average duration of the expected benefit payments from the Main Plan is around 17 years and from the Executive Plan it is around 
14 years.

The current funding target for the UK plans is to maintain assets equal to the value of the accrued benefits. The Main Plan holds two insurance 
policies which match the liabilities in respect of a significant proportion of deferred and retired pensioners. The Executive Plan entered into an 
insurance contract in 2017 which matches the liabilities of the plan in full. 

The regulatory framework in the UK requires the pension scheme Trustees and Group to agree upon the assumptions underlying the funding 
target, and then to agree upon the necessary contributions required to recover any deficit at the valuation date. There is a risk to the Group that 
adverse experience against these assumptions could lead to a requirement for the Group to make considerable contributions to recover any 
deficit. This risk is significantly reduced for the Main Plan and the Executive Plan through the insurance policies held.

North American plans
The Group also sponsors funded defined benefit pension plans in the US and Canada and certain unfunded arrangements (including 
post-employment healthcare benefits for senior employees) in the US. 

Following the acquisition of ESCO in 2018, these plans combined make up 18% of the Group’s pension and other post-employment benefit plan 
commitments and 14% of the Group’s total associated assets. 

The weighted average duration of these plans is around 11 years.

The Group completed the sale of its Flow Control business on 28 June 2019. Details of the defined benefit pension plans transferred as part of 
the sale have not been included in the figures below. These assets and obligations were transferred to non-current liabilities in the discontinued 
balance sheet disclosed in the 2018 financial statements.

The defined benefit plans in the UK and North America expose the Group to a number of risks.

•  Uncertainty in benefit payments

•  Volatility in asset values

•  Uncertainty in cash funding

•  Exchange rate movements

The value of the Group’s liabilities for the defined benefit plans will ultimately depend on the amount of 
benefits paid out. This in turn will depend on the level of inflation (for those benefits that are subject to 
some form of inflation protection) and how long individuals live. This risk is significantly reduced through 
the insurance policies held in the UK.
The Group is exposed to future movements in the values of assets held in the funded defined benefit 
plans to meet future uninsured benefit payments.
Movements in the values of the obligations or assets may result in the Group being required to provide 
higher levels of cash funding, although changes in the level of cash required can often be spread over 
a number of years. This risk is significantly reduced through the insurance policies held. In addition, the 
Group is also exposed to adverse changes in pension regulation.
Movements in exchange rates will affect the value in GBP of the assets and obligations of the Group’s 
North American defined benefit plans.

180

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Assumptions
The significant actuarial assumptions used for accounting purposes reflect prevailing market conditions in the UK and North America and are 
as follows.

Significant actuarial assumptions:
Discount rate (% pa)
Retail Prices Inflation assumption (% pa)

Post-retirement mortality (life expectancies in years):
  Current pensioners at 65 – male
  Current pensioners at 65 – female
  Future pensioners at 65 – male
  Future pensioners at 65 – female

Other related actuarial assumptions:
Rate of increases for pensions in payment (% pa)
  Pre 6 April 2006 service
  Post 5 April 2006 service
Consumer Prices Inflation assumption (% pa)
Rate of increase in healthcare costs

UK pensions

North American pensions & 
post-retirement healthcare

2019

2018

2019

2018

2.1
3.0

21.1
23.1
22.5
24.6

2.9
2.0
1.9
n/a

2.9
3.2

21.6
23.5
23.0
25.1

3.1
2.1
2.1
n/a

3.0
n/a

20.5
22.5
22.1
24.1

n/a
n/a
n/a
*

4.1
n/a

20.6
22.6
22.2
24.2

n/a
n/a
n/a
**

*  Between -4.8% and 7.3% per annum decreasing to 4.5% per annum and remaining static at that level from 2031 onwards.

** Between 7.4% and 20.9% per annum decreasing to 4.5% per annum and remaining static at that level from 2031 onwards.

The assumptions used to determine end-of-year benefit obligations are also used to calculate the following year’s cost. For North America, 
weighted average assumptions are shown above where applicable. 

The post-retirement mortality assumptions allow for expected increases in longevity. The ‘current’ disclosures above relate to assumptions based 
on longevity (in years) following retirement at the balance sheet date, with ‘future’ being that relating to a member retiring in 2040 (in 20 years’ 
time).

The assets and liabilities of the plans are as follows.

Plan assets at fair value
Equities (quoted)
Diversified Growth Funds (primarily quoted)
Corporate bonds (quoted)
Government bonds (quoted)
Insurance policies (unquoted)
Property
Private debt (unquoted)
Cash (quoted)
Fair value of plan assets
Present value of funded obligations
Net funded obligations
Present value of unfunded obligations
Net liability
Plans in deficit

UK pensions

North American pensions & 
post-retirement healthcare

2019
£m

193.8
62.5
41.1
114.1
364.7
–
9.8
28.4
814.4
(882.3)
(67.9)
(1.4)
(69.3)
(69.3)

2018
£m

177.5
55.5
37.3
109.2
360.9
–
–
8.7
749.1
(819.8)
(70.7)
(1.4)
(72.1)
(72.1)

2019
£m

35.2
2.4
52.0
32.5
–
5.0
–
0.3
127.4
(159.8)
(32.4)
(37.0)
(69.4)
(69.4)

2018
£m

30.5
2.0
51.5
25.7
–
5.0
–
1.1
115.8
(151.4)
(35.6)
(41.4)
(77.0)
(77.0)

2019
£m

229.0
64.9
93.1
146.6
364.7
5.0
9.8
28.7
941.8
(1,042.1)
(100.3)
(38.4)
(138.7)
(138.7)

Total

2018
£m

208.0
57.5
88.8
134.9
360.9
5.0
–
9.8
864.9
(971.2)
(106.3)
(42.8)
(149.1)
(149.1)

Of the government bonds held at 31 December 2019, 42% are fixed interest bonds. The pension plans have not directly invested in any of the 
Group’s own financial instruments, or in properties or other assets used by the Group. 

In the UK, where the majority of the Group’s pension assets are held, the investment strategy is to hold equities and other return-seeking assets, 
such as diversified growth funds and a mixture of bonds, to meet the assessed value of the benefits promised for the non-insured deferred 
pensioners. For the remaining deferred pensioners and the bulk of pensioners currently receiving their benefits, the liabilities are backed by 
insurance policies and suitable bonds.

181

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

23. PENSIONS & OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS continued

The change in net liabilities recognised in the balance sheet is comprised as follows.

Opening net liabilities
Net liability transferred on acquisition
Expense charged to the income statement 
Amount recognised in the Consolidated Statement of 
Comprehensive Income
Employer contributions
Net liability transferred to held for sale
Exchange adjustment
Closing net liabilities

UK pension

North American pensions & 
post-retirement healthcare

 Total

2019
£m
(72.1)
–
(1.9)

(3.4)
8.1
–
–
(69.3)

2018
£m
(125.1)
–
(9.3)

59.2
3.1
–
–
(72.1)

2019
£m
(77.0)
–
(3.9)

(1.8)
10.5
–
2.8
(69.4)

2018
£m
(12.6)
(64.2)
(2.7)

(5.5)
6.5
4.8
(3.3)
(77.0)

2019
£m
(149.1)
–
(5.8)

(5.2)
18.6
–
2.8
(138.7)

2018
£m
(137.7)
(64.2)
(12.0)

53.7
9.6
4.8
(3.3)
(149.1)

The amounts recognised for total Group in the Consolidated Income Statement and in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for 
the year are analysed as follows.

Recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement
Current service cost
Past service cost
Curtailment gain
Administrative expenses
Included in operating profit
Interest on net pension liability
Total expense charged to the income statement
Recognised in the Consolidated Statement of 
Comprehensive Income
Actual return on plan assets
Less: interest on plan assets

Other actuarial (losses) gains due to:
  Changes in financial assumptions
  Changes in demographic assumptions
  Experience on benefit obligations
Actuarial (losses) gains recognised in the Consolidated 
Statement of Comprehensive Income

UK pension

North American pensions & 
post-retirement healthcare

Total

2019
£m

–
–
–
–
–
(1.9)
(1.9)

95.5
(21.4)
74.1

(97.9)
20.4
–

(3.4)

2018
£m

–
(6.3)
–
(0.1)
(6.4)
(2.9)
(9.3)

(22.7)
(19.1)
(41.8)

70.2
18.0
12.8

59.2

2019
£m

(1.0)
–
1.1
(1.1)
(1.0)
(2.9)
(3.9)

19.4
(4.6)
14.8

(19.9)
3.0
0.3

2018
£m

(0.5)
–
–
(0.6)
(1.1)
(1.6)
(2.7)

(5.7)
(2.6)
(8.3)

1.8
0.4
0.6

2019
£m

(1.0)
–
1.1
(1.1)
(1.0)
(4.8)
(5.8)

114.9
(26.0)
88.9

(117.8)
23.4
0.3

(1.8)

(5.5)

(5.2)

2018
£m

(0.5)
(6.3)
–
(0.7)
(7.5)
(4.5)
(12.0)

(28.4)
(21.7)
(50.1)

72.0
18.4
13.4

53.7

Current service cost, past service cost, curtailment/settlement gains and administration expenses are recognised in operating costs and interest 
on net pension liability is recognised in other finance costs. 

The Group’s largest North American plan is the US ESCO Corporation pension plan. The Group’s current funding policy for this plan is to pay 
the minimum required contributions under US regulation. However, in the event the plan’s funding level is projected to fall below significant 
thresholds, the Group will consider funding more than the minimum required contribution. 

Pension contributions are determined with the advice of independent qualified actuaries on the basis of regular valuations using the projected 
unit method. The Group made special contributions of £12.9m in 2019 (2018: £5.6m) in addition to the Group’s regular contributions. This included 
a special one-off contribution of £4.0m to the Main UK Plan in July 2019 following the sale of the Flow Control business in June 2019. 

In 2015, the Group entered into a pension funding partnership structure under which it has contributed interests in a Scottish Limited Partnership 
(‘SLP’) for the Main Plan. The Main Plan’s interests in the SLP reduce the deficit on a funding basis, although the agreement will not affect the 
position directly on an IAS 19 accounting basis as the investments held do not qualify as assets for IAS 19 purposes. As a partner in the SLP, the 
Main Plan is entitled to receive a share of the profits of the SLP once a year for 15 years, subject to conditions being met. The profits to be shared 
with the Plan will be reflected in the Group’s financial statements as a pension contribution. 

The latest actuarial funding valuation of the Main Plan as at 31 December 2017 was completed in 2019. Under the agreed recovery plan, 
the Group has agreed to contribute £4.3m in each year from 2019 to 2028 inclusive. These contributions are primarily funded by the income 
payments from the SLP described above. The contributions are subject to an annual review mechanism, and will temporarily cease if the Main 
Plan’s funding level on a funding basis exceeds 105%. 

182

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

The Trustees of the UK Executive Scheme entered into a full buy-in transaction with Scottish Widows in the third quarter of 2017, meaning all of 
the benefit payments due from the Executive Scheme are now covered by an insurance policy. There remains an outstanding premium payment 
(expected to be £1.1m) due from the Trustees to Scottish Widows, which is now expected to be paid in 2020 following a data cleanse process to 
finalise the insurance policy. The IAS 19 balance sheet at the 2019 year end reflects this expected payment due.

The Group has taken legal advice regarding its UK arrangements to confirm the accounting treatment under IFRIC 14 with regard to recognition 
of a current surplus and also recognition of a minimum funding requirement. This confirmed that there is no requirement to adjust the balance 
sheet and that recognition of a current surplus is appropriate on the basis that the Group has an unconditional right to a refund of a current (or 
projected future) surplus at some point in the future. For the same reason, there is no requirement for the Group to adjust the balance sheet to 
recognise the future agreed deficit recovery contributions. Having considered the position, taking account of the legal input received and noting 
that the Trustees of the UK arrangements do not have discretionary powers to unilaterally wind up the schemes without cause, the Directors of 
the Group have concluded that the Group has an unconditional right to a refund of any surplus. 

The total Group contributions for 2020 (including those expected from the SLP in the UK) are expected to be £13.7m.

Sensitivity analysis
Changes in key assumptions can have a significant effect on the reported retirement benefit obligation and the Consolidated Income Statement 
expense for 2020. The effects of changes in those assumptions on the reported retirement benefit obligation are set out in the table below.

Discount rate
  Effect on defined benefit obligation of a 1.0% change
  Effect on net liability of a 1.0% change
RPI inflation (and associated assumptions)
  Effect on defined benefit obligation of a 1.0% change
  Effect on net liability of a 1.0% change
Life expectancy
  Effect on defined benefit obligation of a 1 year change
  Effect on net liability of a 1 year change

Increase

Decrease

Increase

Decrease

2019
£m

153.2
115.9

(99.1)
(65.5)

(37.0)
(21.1)

2019
£m

(183.3)
(141.4)

89.6
58.7

37.0
21.1

2018
£m

140.2
103.7

(91.0)
(57.9)

(34.0)
(18.2)

2018
£m

(167.1)
(126.0)

82.5
51.9

34.0
18.2

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

The impact on the net liability is significantly reduced as a result of the insurance policies held. In the absence of such policies, the impact on the 
net liability would be much closer to the significantly higher impact on the defined benefit obligation shown in the table.

These sensitivities have been calculated to show the movement in the defined benefit obligation and net liability in isolation and assume no 
other changes in market conditions at the accounting date. In practice, for example, a change in discount rate is unlikely to occur without any 
movement in the value of the invested (non-insurance policy) assets held by the plans.

Changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligations are analysed as follows.

Opening defined benefit obligations
Obligations transferred on acquisition
Current service cost 
Past service cost
Interest on benefit obligations
Benefits paid
Actuarial (losses) gains due to

  Changes in financial assumptions
  Changes in demographic assumptions
  Experience on benefit obligations

Gains on curtailments
Obligations transferred to held for sale (note 8)
Exchange rate adjustment
Closing defined benefit obligations

UK pensions

North American pensions & 
post-retirement benefits

Total

2019
£m
(821.2)
–
–
–
(23.3)
38.3

(97.9)
20.4
–
–
–
–
(883.7)

2018
£m
(936.8)
–
–
(6.3)
(22.0)
42.9

70.2
18.0
12.8
–
–
–
(821.2)

2019
£m
(192.8)
–
(1.0)
–
(7.5)
13.7

(19.9)
3.0
0.3
1.1
–
6.3
(196.8)

2018
£m
(26.1)
(183.3)
(0.5)
–
(4.2)
9.5

1.8
0.4
0.6
–
16.2
(7.2)
(192.8)

2019
£m
(1,014.0)
–
(1.0)
–
(30.8)
52.0

(117.8)
23.4
0.3
1.1
–
6.3
(1,080.5)

2018
£m
(962.9)
(183.3)
(0.5)
(6.3)
(26.2)
52.4

72.0
18.4
13.4
–
16.2
(7.2)
(1,014.0)

183

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

23. PENSIONS & OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS continued
Changes in the fair value of plan assets are analysed as follows.

UK pensions

North American pensions & 
post-retirement benefits

Total

Opening plan assets
Assets transferred on acquisition
Interest on plan assets
Employer contributions
Administrative expenses
Benefits paid
Actual return on plan assets less interest on plan assets
Assets transferred to held for sale (note 8)
Exchange rate adjustment
Closing plan assets

24. SHARE CAPITAL & RESERVES

2019
£m
749.1
–
21.4
8.1
–
(38.3)
74.1
–
–
814.4

2018
£m
811.7
–
19.1
3.1
(0.1)
(42.9)
(41.8)
–
–
749.1

2019
£m
115.8
–
4.6
10.5
(1.1)
(13.7)
14.8
–
(3.5)
127.4

2018
£m
13.5
119.1
2.6
6.5
(0.6)
(9.5)
(8.3)
(11.4)
3.9
115.8

Issued & fully paid share capital
At the beginning of the year
Issued during the year in respect of ESCO acquisition (note 13)
Issued during the year in respect of scrip dividends (note 10)
At the end of the year

Treasury shares
At the beginning of the year
Purchase of shares in respect of equity settled share-based payments
Utilised during the year in respect of equity settled share-based payments
At the end of the year

2019
£m
864.9
–
26.0
18.6
(1.1)
(52.0)
88.9
–
(3.5)
941.8

2018
£m
825.2
119.1
21.7
9.6
(0.7)
(52.4)
(50.1)
(11.4)
3.9
864.9

2019
Number 
million

2018
Number  
million

259.6
–
–
259.6

0.2
0.7
(0.9)
–

224.7
33.5
1.4
259.6

0.5
–
(0.3)
0.2

The Company has one class of ordinary share with a par value of 12.5p which carries no rights to fixed income.

Kleinwort Employee Benefit Trust (EBT) was wound up during the year with shares transferred to Estera Employee Benefit Trust and subsequently 
transferred to Computershare Investor Services PLC. 

As at 31 December 2019, Computershare Investor Services PLC held on behalf of individuals:

24,478 shares (2018: 47,207) for the ESCO restricted awards made under the ESCO 2010 stock incentive plan. These shares have a market value 
of £0.4m.

61,418 shares (2018: nil) for the performance shares that have vested under the LTIP. These shares have a market value of £1.0m.

15,813 shares (2018: 25,828) for the Bonus shares awarded under the LTIP. These shares have a market value of £0.3m.

39,396 shares (2018: 21,128) for the Bonus shares awarded under the Share Reward Plan. These shares have a market value of £0.6m.

As at 31 December 2019, 24,045 (2018: 3,803) shares were unallocated and held by the Estera Employee Benefit Trust (EBT) with a market value 
of £0.4m.

In the prior year, holdings were:

As at 2018, 3,803 shares were held by the Kleinwort Employee Benefit Trust (EBT) with a market value of £0.1m. 

As at 2018, the Estera Employee Benefit Trust held: 

6,549 shares for the performance and restricted awards made under the LTIP. These shares had a market value of £0.1m. 

25,828 shares for the Bonus shares awarded under the LTIP. These shares had a market value of £0.3m.

21,128 shares for the Bonus shares awarded under the Share Reward Plan (SRP). These shares had a market value of £0.3m. 

47,207 shares for the ESCO restricted awards made under the ESCO 2010 stock incentive plan. These shares had a market value of £0.6m.

184

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Reserves
The period movements on the below reserves are summarised in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity.

Merger reserve
The shares issued directly to ESCO Shareholders on 12 July 2018 qualified for merger relief under Section 612 of the Companies Act 2006, 
resulting in an increase to the reserve of £323.2m. The merger reserve was created by the issue of new equity in relation to the acquisition of 
Delta Industrial Valves Inc. during 2015. 

Capital redemption reserve
The capital redemption reserve was created by a repurchase and cancellation of own shares during the 53 weeks ended 1 January 1999.

Foreign currency translation reserve
The foreign currency translation reserve is used to record exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign 
operations and the Group’s hedge of its net investment in foreign operations. In the year, the balance relating to Flow Control entities was 
recycled to the Consolidated Income Statement on disposal (note 8).

Hedge accounting reserve
This reserve records the portion of the gains or losses on hedging instruments used as cash flow hedges that are determined to be effective. 
Net gains (losses) transferred from equity during the year are included in the following line items in the Consolidated Income Statement and 
Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Revenue
Cost of sales
Finance costs

25. ADDITIONAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Total operations
Net cash generated from operations
Operating (loss) profit – continuing operations
Operating loss – discontinued operations
Operating (loss) profit – total operations
Exceptional items
Amortisation of intangible assets
Share of results of joint ventures 
Depreciation of property, plant & equipment
Depreciation of right-of-use assets
Grants received
(Gains) losses on disposal of property, plant & equipment 
Funding of pension & post-retirement costs
Employee share schemes
Transactional foreign exchange
Decrease in provisions
Cash generated from operations before working capital cash flows
Increase in inventories
Decrease in trade & other receivables & construction contracts
Decrease in trade & other payables & construction contracts
Cash generated from operations before exceptional cash items
Additional pension contributions paid
Exceptional cash items
Income tax paid
Net cash generated from operating activities

Cash flows from discontinued operations included above are disclosed separately in note 8.

Exceptional items are detailed in note 5.

185

Notes

5, 8
5, 12
15
11
11

27

2019
£m
–
(0.2)
(0.5)
(0.7)

2019
£m

(322.2)
(3.3)
(325.5)
596.4
78.3
(6.2)
62.4
42.4
(1.1)
(2.0)
(4.9)
12.9
12.1
(1.8)
463.0
(36.8)
64.5
(83.1)
407.6
(12.9)
(41.0)
(90.2)
263.5

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

2018
£m
1.2
1.4
–
2.6

2018
£m

124.1
(29.7)
94.4
209.3
67.3
(2.4)
64.5
–
(1.5)
0.2
(2.5)
8.6
15.3
(2.9)
450.3
(53.2)
36.5
(22.8)
410.8
(5.6)
(114.0)
(73.3)
217.9

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

25. ADDITIONAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION continued
The employee-related provision and associated insurance asset in relation to US asbestos-related claims with an exposure date pre-1981 
disclosed in note 21 will not result in any cash flows either to or from the Group and therefore they have been excluded from the table above.

The following tables summarise the cash flows arising on acquisitions and disposals (note 8 and 13).

Acquisitions of subsidiaries 
Acquisition of subsidiaries – cash paid
Cash & cash equivalents acquired
Total cash outflow relating to acquisitions

Net cash inflow arising on disposals
Consideration received net of costs paid & cash disposed of
Prior period disposals completion adjustment
Total cash inflow relating to disposals

Net debt comprises the following
Cash & short-term deposits (note 18)
Current interest-bearing loans & borrowings (note 19)
Non-current interest-bearing loans & borrowings (note 19)
Assets and liabilities held for sale (note 8)

Reconciliation of financing cash flows to movement in net debt

2019
£m

(0.1)
–
(0.1)

244.6
0.1
244.7

2019
£m

2018
£m

(470.8)
41.2
(429.6)

–
0.3
0.3

2018
£m

273.8
(534.1)
(896.2)
–
(1,156.5)

263.0
(662.5)
(740.9)
13.9
(1,126.5)

Cash & cash equivalents

Third-party loans
Leases
Unamortised issue costs
Amounts included in gross debt

Opening 
balance 
at 31 
December 
2018
£m
277.2

(1,402.1)
(2.5)
0.9
(1,403.7)

Cash 
movements
£m
15.4

Additions**
£m
–

Disposals
£m
–

Non-cash 
movements
£m
–

FX
£m
(20.5)

Closing 
balance 
at 31 
December 
2019
£m
272.1

Transferred 
to assets/
liabilities 
held for 
sale
£m
–

108.3
44.3
0.8
153.4

–
(244.7)
–
(244.7)

–
11.8
–
11.8

49.3
5.9
–
55.2

–
0.2
(0.8)
(0.6)

(1,244.5)
(185.0)
0.9
(1,428.6)

Amounts included in net debt

(1,126.5)

168.8

(244.7)

11.8

34.7

(0.6)

(1,156.5)

Financing derivatives
Contingent consideration
Other liabilities relating to financing activities

(18.3)
(0.2)
(18.5)

62.2
0.1
62.3

–
–
–

–
–
–

–
0.1
0.1

(47.7)
–
(47.7)

(3.8)
–
(3.8)

Total financing liabilities*

(1,422.2)

215.7

(244.7)

11.8

55.3

(48.3)

(1,432.4)

*  Total financing liabilities comprise gross debt plus other liabilities relating to financing activities.

** Additions in the period include the transition impact of IFRS 16 ‘Leases’ in the opening balance sheet, totalling £194.1 (note 2).

186

Total  
continuing 
operations
£m
272.1

(1,244.5)
(185.0)
0.9
(1,428.6)

(1,156.5)

(3.8)
–
(3.8)

(1,432.4)

–
–
–
–

–

–
–
–

–

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Opening 
balance 
at 31 
December 
2017
£m
284.5

Cash 
movements
£m
(3.5)

Additions/ 
acquisitions
£m
–

Disposals
£m
–

Non-cash 
movements
£m
–

FX
£m
(3.8)

Closing 
balance 
at 31 
December 
2018
£m
277.2

Transferred 
to assets/
liabilities 
held for 
sale
£m
14.2

Total 
continuing 
operations
£m
263.0

Cash & cash equivalents

Third-party loans
Leases
Unamortised issue costs
Amounts included in gross debt

(1,128.2)
(1.0)
1.5
(1,127.7)

(103.7)
0.8
–
(102.9)

(118.6)
(2.3)
–
(120.9)

Amounts included in net debt

(843.2)

(106.4)

(120.9)

Financing derivatives
Contingent consideration
Other liabilities relating to financing activities

(9.2)
(3.4)
(12.6)

(49.9)
–
(49.9)

–
(0.2)
(0.2)

Total financing liabilities*

(1,140.3)

(152.8)

(121.1)

*  Total financing liabilities comprise gross debt plus other liabilities relating to financing activities.

–
–
–
–

–

–
–
–

–

(51.6)
–
–
(51.6)

–
–
(0.6)
(0.6)

(1,402.1)
(2.5)
0.9
(1,403.7)

(0.3)
–
–
(0.3)

(1,401.8)
(2.5)
0.9
(1,403.4)

(55.4)

(0.6)

(1,126.5)

13.9

(1,140.4)

–
(0.1)
(0.1)

40.8
3.5
44.3

(18.3)
(0.2)
(18.5)

–
–
–

(18.3)
(0.2)
(18.5)

(51.7)

43.7

(1,422.2)

(0.3)

(1,421.9)

26. COMMITMENTS & LEGAL CLAIMS
Lease costs, following the adoption of IFRS 16 ‘Leases’, are now disclosed in note 11. The lease disclosures below are given in relation to 
continuing operations for the year ended 31 December 2018.

Operating lease commitments 
Future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases are shown in the table below.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Less than 1 year
After 1 year but no more than 5 years
More than 5 years
Transfer of operating lease commitments from discontinued operations
Impact of IFRS 16 data review*

2018
(restated)
£m
47.4
98.2
51.7
1.3
13.7
212.3

*  As part of the transition to IFRS 16 ‘Leases’, a number of operating lease commitments were identified that had not been included in 2018 (see note 2).

Finance lease commitments 
In 2018 the Group had finance leases for buildings and plant & equipment. Future minimum lease payments under finance leases together with 
the present value of the net minimum lease payments are shown in the table below.

Less than 1 year
After 1 year but not more than 5 years
After 5 years
Total minimum lease payments
Less amounts representing finance charges
Present value of minimum lease payments

Minimum 
payments
2018
£m
1.0
1.5
0.1
2.6
(0.1)
2.5

Present value 
of payments
2018
£m
1.0
1.4
0.1
–
–
2.5

The weighted average outstanding lease term in 2018 was 3.08 years. For the year ended 31 December 2018, the weighted average effective 
borrowing rate was 8.2%.

All leases are on a fixed repayment basis and no arrangements have been entered into for contingent rental payments.

Capital commitments

Outstanding capital commitments contracted but not provided for – property, plant & equipment
Outstanding capital commitments contracted but not provided for – intangible assets

The Group’s share of the capital commitments of its joint ventures amounted to £1.5m (2018: £2.1m).

2019
£m
18.0
0.5

2018
£m
17.9
2.5

187

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

26. COMMITMENTS & LEGAL CLAIMS continued
Legal claims
The Company and certain subsidiaries are, from time to time, parties to legal proceedings and claims which arise in the normal course 
of business. Provisions have been made where the Directors have assessed that a cash outflow is likely and they believe all other claims 
are remote.

27. EQUITY SETTLED SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
Employee share plans
The Group’s 2018 Share Reward Plan (SRP) allows for Restricted shares and Bonus shares to be awarded to employees under the Plan. 
This replaces the LTIP 2014 Rules (LTIP) under which the types of awards which were granted included: Performance shares, Restricted shares 
and Bonus shares. Details of both the SRP and LTIP are outlined in the Remuneration Report on pages 102-125.

As part of the ESCO acquisition, certain Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs) issued by ESCO pre-acquisition were 
rolled into Weir Group share awards. The pre-acquisition cost of these awards totalled £1.4m and was recorded in reserves, with a corresponding 
increase in goodwill. These awards are treated in line with other restricted awards noted above.

During the year, the Global all employee Weir ShareBuilder plan (WSBP) launched. Awards granted under the WSBP are Free shares given to all 
employees who meet the eligibility criteria. Awards vest in three equal tranches on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. 
Dividend equivalents will be added in the form of shares at each vesting date.

One-off conditional share awards are also occasionally granted to employees. These transactions fall under the scope of IFRS 2 and are treated in 
line with awards issued under the Group’s SRP in the year or LTIP in prior years.

The following tables illustrate the number and weighted average share prices (WASP) of shares awarded.

Performance shares

Outstanding at the beginning of the period
Exercised during the period
Forfeited during the period
Outstanding at the end of the period

Restricted shares

Outstanding at the beginning of the period
Awarded during the period
Exercised during the period
Outstanding at the end of the period

Weir ShareBuilder Plan (WSBP)

Outstanding at the beginning of the period
Awarded during the period
Outstanding at the end of the period

2019
Number
million
0.6
(0.2)
–
0.4

2019
Number
million
1.1
0.6
(0.6)
1.1

2019
Number
million
–
0.2
0.2

2019
WASP
£15.09
£12.13
–
£17.46

2019
WASP
£18.13
£16.39
£16.42
£17.91

2019
WASP
–
£16.32
£16.32

2018
Number
million
1.1
–
(0.5)
0.6

2018
Number
million
0.8
0.6
(0.3)
1.1

2018
Number
million
–
–
–

2018
WASP
£16.34
–
£18.07
£15.09

2018
WASP
£14.89
£20.17
£14.41
£18.14

2018
WASP
–
–
–

In respect of awards issued in the year and revised estimates of previously issued awards, an amount of £12.9m has been charged (2018: £8.6m) 
to the Consolidated Income Statement in respect of the number of awards which are expected to be made at the end of the vesting period. 

The remaining contractual lives of the outstanding LTIP, SRP, WSBP and one-off conditional share awards at the end of the period are as follows.

Year of award
2016
2017
2018
2019

2019
Number
million
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.9

Remaining
contractual
life
8 months
3 months
16 months
17 months

2018
Number
million
0.7
0.5
0.5
–

Remaining 
contractual
life
8 months
12 months
23 months
–

188

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

The fair value at date of grant of the conditional awards under the SRP has been independently estimated based on the type of award: 

i) Restricted shares and WSBP
The grant date fair value of these awards is calculated as the share price at the date of grant less an adjustment for loss of reinvestment return on 
the dividend equivalent. There are no performance conditions attached to these awards. 

The fair value of WSBP awards at grant date and occasional one-off conditional awards at grant date is also estimated on this basis.

ii) Performance shares
No performance shares were granted in 2019 or 2018.

Bonus shares
Under the Group’s annual bonus plan, Executive Directors and members of the Group Executive typically receive 30% of any bonus deferred into 
an award of Weir Group shares which will normally be released after three years. These awards are entitled to accrue the value of the dividends 
payable on any deferred bonus awards during the three year holding period.

The SRP and LTIP Bonus shares are administered by Computershare Trust Company, N.A., CPU Share Plans Pty Ltd and Computershare Investor 
Services PLC. The shares are acquired on market at the grant date and are held by Computershare Investor Services PLC until such time as they 
are vested. Forfeited shares are reallocated in subsequent grants. Under the Rules of the Plans, Weir Group is required to provide the necessary 
funding for the acquisition of the shares at the time of the grant.

The number of shares to be granted is determined based on the applicable annual bonus divided by the price at which the Company’s shares are 
traded at the date of the grant. In 2019, 20,577 shares were awarded (2018: 21,128).

The fair value of the rights at grant date was estimated by taking the market price of the Company’s shares on that date.

28. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURE
The following table provides the total amount of significant transactions which have been entered into by total operations with related parties for 
the relevant financial year and outstanding balances at the year end.

Related party
Joint ventures

Group pension plans

Sales to related 
parties – goods
£m
9.6
4.5
–
–

Sales to related 
parties – 
services
£m
0.2
0.4
–
–

Purchases from 
related parties 
– goods
£m
21.4
10.1
–
–

Purchases from 
related parties 
– services
£m
0.8
0.8
–
–

Amounts owed 
to related 
parties
£m
–
–
6.1
6.3

2019
2018
2019
2018

Contributions to the Group pension plans are disclosed in note 23.

Terms & conditions of transactions with related parties
Sales to and from related parties are made at normal market prices. Outstanding balances at the period end are unsecured and settlement occurs 
in cash. There have been no guarantees provided or received for any related party balances. For 2019, the Group has not raised any provision for 
doubtful debts relating to amounts owed by related parties (2018: £nil) as the payment history has been excellent. This assessment is undertaken 
each financial year through examining the financial position of the related party and the market in which the related party operates.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Compensation of key management personnel
Short-term employee benefits
Share-based payments
Post-employment benefits

Emoluments paid to the Directors of The Weir Group PLC
Remuneration
Gains made on the exercise of Long Term Incentive Plan awards

2019
£m
6.2
3.5
0.2
9.9

2019
£m
2.8
0.8
3.6

2018
£m
7.5
2.2
0.2
9.9

2018
£m
2.9
1.4
4.3

Key management comprises the Board and the Group Executive. Further details of the Directors’ remuneration are disclosed in the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report on pages 102-125.

189

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

29. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
A. Derivative financial instruments
The Group enters into derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business in order to hedge its exposure to foreign exchange risk. 
Derivatives are only used for economic hedging purposes and no speculative positions are taken. Derivatives are recognised as held for trading 
and at fair value through profit and loss unless they are designated in IFRS 9 compliant hedge relationships.

The table below summarises the types of derivative financial instrument included within each balance sheet category.

Included in non-current assets
Cross currency swaps designated as net investment hedges
Other forward foreign currency contracts 

Included in current assets
Forward foreign currency contracts designated as cash flow hedges
Forward foreign currency contracts designated as net investment hedges
Other forward foreign currency contracts 

Included in current liabilities
Forward foreign currency contracts designated as cash flow hedges
Forward foreign currency contracts designated as net investment hedges
Other forward foreign currency contracts 

Included in non-current liabilities
Other forward foreign currency contracts 

Net derivative financial liabilities – continuing operations
Net derivative financial liabilities held for sale
Net derivative financial liabilities – total Group

2019
£m

4.1
0.3
4.4

0.3
1.5
14.7
16.5

(10.3)
(0.6)
(13.9)
(24.8)

(0.3)
(0.3)
(4.2)
–
(4.2)

2018
£m

1.4
–
1.4

–
0.5
17.8
18.3

–
(26.4)
(14.4)
(40.8)

(0.2)
(0.2)
(21.3)
(0.4)
(21.7)

B. Financial assets and liabilities
Financial assets and liabilities (with the exception of derivative financial instruments) are initially recognised at fair value net of transaction costs. 
Subsequently they are recognised at either fair value or amortised cost. Derivative financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value and 
subsequently remeasured at fair value.

The Group uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of financial instruments by valuation technique:

Level 1:   Quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2:  

 Other techniques for which all inputs that have a significant effect on the recorded fair value are observable, either directly 
or indirectly;

Level 3:  

 Techniques which use inputs that have a significant effect on the recorded fair value that are not based on observable 
market data. 

At 31 December 2018, the Group has classified contingent consideration as level 3. A summary of the movements in the contingent 
consideration has been included in note 13.

During the periods ended 31 December 2019 and 31 December 2018, there were no transfers between level 1 and level 2 fair value 
measurements and no transfers into or out of level 3 fair value measurements. 

Offsetting
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the balance sheet where the Group currently has a legal right to offset 
the recognised amounts, and there is an intention to settle on a net basis or realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

As at 31 December 2019, cash & short-term deposits of £273.8m (2018: £279.1m) and current interest bearing loans & borrowings of £534.1m 
(2018: £664.7m) were presented after elimination of debit and credit balances within individual pools of £0.2m (2018: £0.8m).

The Group has also entered into arrangements that do not meet the criteria for offsetting but still allow for the related amounts to be offset in 
specific circumstances. As at 31 December 2019, the Group had derivative financial instruments of £2.9m which were subject to master netting 
arrangements but not offset.

190

 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Carrying amounts and fair values
The table below shows the carrying amounts and fair values of the Group’s financial instruments that are reported in the financial statements.

Financial assets – total Group
Derivative financial instruments recognised at fair value through profit 
or loss 
Derivative financial instruments in designated hedge accounting 
relationships
Trade & other receivables excluding statutory assets, prepayments & 
construction contract assets
Cash & short-term deposits

Financial liabilities – total Group
Derivative financial instruments recognised at fair value through profit 
or loss 
Derivative financial instruments in designated hedge accounting 
relationships 
Amortised cost
  Fixed-rate borrowings 
  Floating-rate borrowings
Leases
Bank overdrafts & short-term borrowings
Trade & other payables excluding statutory liabilities & contract liabilities

Financial assets – total Group
Derivative financial instruments recognised at fair value through profit 
or loss 
Derivative financial instruments in designated hedge accounting 
relationships
Trade & other receivables excluding statutory assets, prepayments, 
contingent consideration & construction contract assets
Cash & short-term deposits
Financial assets held for sale

Financial liabilities – total Group
Derivative financial instruments recognised at fair value through profit 
or loss 
Derivative financial instruments in designated hedge accounting 
relationships 
Contingent consideration payable
Amortised cost
  Fixed-rate borrowings 
  Floating-rate borrowings
Obligations under finance leases
Trade & other payables excluding statutory liabilities & contract liabilities
Financial liabilities held for sale

Fair value measurement using

Carrying 
amount
2019
£m

Fair value
2019
£m

Level 1
Quoted prices 
in active 
markets
£m

Level 2
Significant 
observable 
inputs
£m

Level 3
Significant 
unobservable 
inputs
£m

15.0

5.9

552.9
273.8
847.6

14.2

10.9

595.2
648.4
185.0
1.7
511.0
1,966.4

Carrying 
amount
2018
£m

17.8

1.9

625.2
263.0
125.1
1,033.0

14.6

26.4
0.2

783.7
617.2
2.5
573.5
93.2
2,111.3

15.0

5.9

552.9
273.8
847.6

14.2

10.9

640.3
648.4
185.0
1.7
511.0
2,011.5

–

–

–
–

–

–

–
–
–
–
–

15.0

5.9

552.9
273.8

14.2

10.9

640.3
648.4
185.0
1.7
511.0

–

–

–
–

–

–

–
–
–
–
–

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Fair value measurement using

Level 1
Quoted prices 
in active 
markets
£m

Level 2
Significant 
observable 
inputs
£m

Level 3
Significant 
unobservable 
inputs
£m

Fair value
2018
£m

17.8

1.9

625.2
263.0
125.1
1,033.0

14.6

26.4
0.2

827.7
617.2
2.5
573.5
93.2
2,155.3

–

–

–
–
–

–

–
–

–
–
–
–
–

17.8

1.9

625.2
263.0
125.1

14.6

26.4
–

827.7
617.2
2.5
573.5
93.2

–

–

–
–
–

–

–
0.2

–
–
–
–
–

The fair value of cash & short-term deposits, trade & other receivables and trade & other payables approximates their carrying amount due to the 
short-term maturities of these instruments. As such, disclosure of the fair value hierarchy for these items is not required.

191

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

29. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS continued
C. Hedging activities
The Group designates certain derivative financial instruments in either cash flow hedging or net investment hedging relationships in accordance 
with IFRS 9.

Hedge relationship
Hedged risk
Hedging instruments

Cash Flow Hedge
Cash flow hedge of highly probable forecast foreign 
currency purchases and sales
Transactional foreign exchange risk
Forward foreign currency contracts

Net Investment Hedge

Net investment hedge of foreign operations
Translational foreign exchange risk
Foreign currency debt
Cross currency swaps
Forward foreign currency contracts

For each type of derivative financial instrument, the net carrying amount and maturity date ranges are set out in the table below.

Year ended 31 December 2019
Forward foreign currency contracts designated as cash flow hedges
Forward foreign currency contracts designated as net investment hedges
Cross currency swaps designated as net investment hedges
Other forward foreign currency contracts at fair value through profit or loss

Year ended 31 December 2018
Forward foreign currency contracts designated as cash flow hedges
Forward foreign currency contracts designated as net investment hedges
Cross currency swaps designated as net investment hedges
Other forward foreign currency contracts at fair value through profit or loss

Net carrying 
amount
£m
(10.0)
0.9
4.1
0.8
(4.2)

Net carrying 
amount
£m
–
(25.9)
1.4
2.8
(21.7)

Maturity
dates
2020
2020
2021
2020 to 2023

Maturity
dates
2019
2019
2018 to 2021
2019 to 2020

For each type of derivative financial instrument, the amounts recognised for the period in profit or loss and equity are set out in the table below. 
In the financial statements these amounts are offset by the retranslation of foreign currency denominated receivables and payables, the impact 
of which is also set out in the table below.

Year ended 31 December 2019
Instruments measured at FVTPL
Designated in hedge accounting relationships
Forward foreign currency contracts designated as cash flow hedges
Forward foreign currency contracts designated as net 
investment hedges
Cross currency swaps designated as net investment hedges
Not designated in hedge accounting relationships
Other forward foreign currency contracts at fair value through profit or 
loss (FVTPL)
Total gains/(losses) on instruments measured at FVTPL

Amounts recognised  
in profit or loss

Amounts recognised  
in equity

Total  
amounts 
recognised in 
profit or loss
£m

Hedge 
accounting 
reserve
£m

Foreign 
currency 
translation 
reserve
£m

Losses 
recycled to 
inventory
£m

Other losses
£m

0.7

–
–

27.3
28.0

0.7

–
–

27.3
28.0

(1.3)

1.2

–
–

–
(1.3)

(21.7)
1.8

–
(18.7)

0.4

–
–

–
0.4

192

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Year ended 31 December 2018
Instruments measured at FVTPL
Designated in hedge accounting relationships
Forward foreign currency contracts designated as cash flow hedges
Forward foreign currency contracts designated as net 
investment hedges
Cross currency swaps designated as net investment hedges
Not designated in hedge accounting relationships
Other forward foreign currency contracts at fair value through profit or 
loss (FVTPL)
Total gains/(losses) on instruments measured at FVTPL

Amounts recognised  
in profit or loss

Amounts recognised  
in equity

Other (gains)/
losses
£m

Total  
amounts 
recognised in 
profit or loss
£m

Hedge 
accounting 
reserve
£m

Foreign 
currency 
translation 
reserve
£m

Losses 
recycled to 
inventory
£m

(2.6)

(2.6)

–
–

13.9
11.3

–
–

13.9
11.3

0.8

–
–

–
0.8

–

(0.1)

(52.1)
0.7

–
(51.4)

–
–

–
(0.1)

Hedge ineffectiveness
Hedge effectiveness is determined at the inception of the hedge relationship, and through periodic prospective effectiveness assessments to 
ensure that an economic relationship exists between the hedged item and hedging instrument.

For hedges of foreign currency revenue and cost of sales, the Group enters into hedge relationships where the critical terms of the hedging 
instrument match exactly with the terms of the hedged item. The Group therefore performs a qualitative assessment of effectiveness. If changes 
in circumstances affect the terms of the hedged item such that the critical terms no longer match exactly with the critical terms of the hedging 
instrument, the Group uses the hypothetical derivative method to determine whether an economic relationship remains, and so assess 
effectiveness. As all critical terms matched during the year, the economic relationships were 100% effective.

Ineffectiveness may arise if the timing of the forecast transaction changes from what was originally estimated, or if there are changes in the 
credit risk of the Group or the derivative counterparty.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

The Group enters into fixed-for-fixed cross currency interest rate swaps which are designated as hedging instruments in net investment hedges 
of the net assets of foreign operations. The swaps have similar critical terms as the hedged items, as the coupon and principal settlements 
exchange currencies matching both denomination and amounts of the hedged net assets, for amounts denominated in the presentation currency 
of the Group. The Group also utilises borrowings which are measured at amortised cost and denominated in the currency of the hedged net 
assets, as hedging instruments in net investment hedges. The Group does not hedge 100% of its net assets of foreign operations, therefore the 
hedged item is identified as a proportion of the net assets of the foreign operations up to the notional amount of the swaps and principal amount 
of the borrowings. As all critical terms matched during the year, the economic relationships were 100% effective. 

Hedge ineffectiveness for the cross currency interest rate swaps is assessed using the same principles as for hedges of foreign currency 
revenue and cost of sales. It may occur due to the credit value/debit value adjustment on the cross currency interest rate swaps which is not 
matched by the net assets retranslation.

There was no ineffectiveness during 2019 or 2018 in relation to the cross currency interest rate swaps or foreign exchange forwards.

Effects of hedge accounting on financial position and performance
The effects of the foreign currency related hedging instruments on the Group’s financial position and performance are as follows:

Cash flow hedging: foreign currency forwards
Carrying amount (£m)
  Assets
  Liabilities
Notional amounts (m)
  USD
  GBP
  EUR
Average exchange rates
  GBP:USD
  USD:AUD
  GBP:EUR

Maturity dates
Hedge ratios*
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments since 1 January (£m)
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedge effectiveness (£m)

*  The foreign currency forwards are denominated in the same currency as the highly probable future transactions, therefore the hedge ratio is 1:1.

193

2019
(10.0)
0.3
(10.3)

12.5
–
210.0

–
1.45
1.12

01/2020  
– 08/2020
1:1
(1.3)
1.3

2018
–
0.2
(0.2)

4.5
3.2
–

1.37
1.31
–
01/2019
– 09/2019
1:1
0.8
(0.8)

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

29. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS continued 

Net investment hedging: foreign currency forwards, cross currency swaps and borrowings
Carrying amount (£m)
  Assets
  Liabilities – derivatives
  Liabilities – borrowings
Notional amounts (m)
  USD
  ZAR
  AUD
  EUR
Average exchange rates
  GBP:USD
  GBP:ZAR
  GBP:AUD
  GBP:EUR

Maturity dates
Hedge ratios*
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments since 1 January (£m)
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedge effectiveness (£m)

2019
(371.6)
5.6
(0.6)
(376.6)

655.6
345.0
167.5
21.0

2018
(499.3)
1.9
(26.4)
(474.9)

1,689.2
345.0
176.2
117.6

1.32
18.39
1.81
1.13
01/2020
– 02/2022
1:1
(2.4)
2.4

1.35
19.04
1.84
1.28
01/2019
– 02/2022
1:1
(72.8)
72.8

*  The derivatives and borrowings are denominated in the same currency as the highly probable future transactions, therefore the hedge ratio is 1:1.

D. Financial risk management 
Financial risk management of the Group is carried out by Group Treasury in conjunction with individual subsidiaries. The principal financial risks to 
which the Group is exposed are market risk, liquidity risk and credit risk.

Market risk
The Group is exposed to foreign exchange risk and interest rate risk in the ordinary course of business.

i) Foreign exchange risk
The Group is exposed to both transactional and translational foreign exchange risk. Transactional risk arises when subsidiaries enter into 
transactions denominated in currencies other than their functional currency for operational or financing purposes or when the Group’s Treasury 
function enters into transactions for financing or risk management purposes. Translational risk arises on the translation of overseas earnings 
and investments into sterling for consolidated reporting purposes. Foreign currency transactional and translational risk could result in volatility in 
reported consolidated earnings and net assets.

In respect of transactional foreign currency risk, the Group maintains a policy that all operating units eliminate exposures on committed foreign 
currency transactions, usually by entering into forward foreign currency contracts through the Group’s Treasury function. Certain operating units 
apply cash flow hedge accounting in accordance with IFRS 9. The Group does not engage in any speculative foreign exchange transactions.

The Group has material foreign investments in the US, Australia, Europe and South Africa. In respect of translational risk, the Group has a 
policy of partially hedging its net investment exposure to US Dollar (US$), Australian Dollar (AUD), euro (EUR) and South African Rand (ZAR) 
denominated subsidiaries. This is achieved through designating an element of foreign currency borrowings, forward foreign currency contracts 
and cross currency swaps as net investment hedges against the Group’s investments. The Group does not hedge the translational exposure 
arising from profit and loss items.

194

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Sensitivity to foreign exchange rates
The Group considers the most significant transactional foreign exchange risk relates to the Australian Dollar, Canadian Dollar, euro and US Dollar. 
The following table shows the impact of movements in derivative valuation as a result of a weakening of these currencies. In the Consolidated 
Income Statement, these amounts are partially offset by the retranslation of foreign currency denominated receivables and payables.

Transactional foreign exchange
2019
Australian Dollar
Canadian Dollar
Euro
US Dollar

2018
Australian Dollar
Canadian Dollar
Euro
US Dollar

Increase in 
currency rate

Effect on profit 
gain (loss)
£m

Effect on equity 
gain
£m

+25%
+25%
+25%
+25%

+25%
+25%
+25%
+25%

(8.2)
(32.2)
(54.1)
37.3

(10.2)
(29.6)
(79.9)
13.8

(17.7)
–
3.6
71.9

19.0
–
20.3
262.8

The Group is also exposed to translational foreign exchange risk as a result of its global operations and therefore the earnings of the Group 
will fluctuate due to changes in foreign exchange rates in relation to sterling. The Group’s operating profit from continuing operations before 
exceptional items and intangibles amortisation was denominated in the following currencies.

US Dollar
Canadian Dollar
Chilean Peso
Euro
Australian Dollar
Russian Rouble
Indian Rupee
Brazilian Real
South African Rand
United Arab Emirates Dirham
UK Sterling
Other
Operating profit from continuing operations before exceptional items & intangibles amortisation

2019
£m
206.7
53.9
43.2
34.2
30.1
9.9
8.9
6.2
4.1
2.3
(51.7)
4.3
352.1

2018
£m
224.6
48.7
40.5
22.1
29.8
4.9
7.2
4.7
5.9
7.3
(44.0)
(3.6)
348.1

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

ii) Interest rate risk
The Group is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding borrowings. Changes in interest rates will affect future interest cash flows on 
floating-rate debt and the fair value of fixed-rate borrowings.

The earnings of the Group are sensitive to changes in interest rates in respect of floating-rate borrowings. As at 31 December 2019, 52% 
(2018: 44%) of the Group’s borrowings were at floating interest rates. The interest rate profile of the Group’s interest bearing borrowings was 
as follows.

US Dollar
Euro
UK Sterling
Other

Floating rate
£m
(158.3)
(190.5)
(300.0)
–

Fixed rate
£m
(595.7)
–
–
–

2019

Total
£m
(754.0)
(190.5)
(300.0)
–

Floating rate
£m
(19.6)
(477.6)
(120.0)
–

Fixed rate
£m
(784.6)
–
(0.3)
–

2018

Total
£m
(804.2)
(477.6)
(120.3)
–

Sensitivity to interest rates
Based on borrowings at 31 December 2019, a 1% increase in interest rates would have a £6.5m (2018: £6.7m) impact on the profit before tax 
and amortisation of the Group. This assumes that the change in interest rates is effective from the beginning of the period and that all other 
variables are constant throughout the period.

195

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

29. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS continued 

Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group is unable to meet its financial liabilities as they fall due.

Liquidity risk is managed by monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and ensuring that sufficient committed facilities are in place to meet 
possible downside scenarios. The Group’s objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through the use of 
fixed-rate loan notes, bank loans, commercial paper and bank overdrafts. Further details of the Group’s borrowing facilities are disclosed in 
note 19.

The tables below show only the financial liabilities of the Total Group by maturity. The amounts disclosed in the table are undiscounted cash flows 
and may therefore not agree to the amounts disclosed in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The Group manages its liquidity to ensure that it always has sufficient funding to grow the business and is able to meet its obligations as they 
fall due.

Year ended 31 December 2019

Total Group
Forward foreign currency contracts – net outflow
Cash flows relating to derivative financial liabilities
Trade & other payables excluding statutory liabilities & deferred income
Leases
Bank overdrafts & short-term borrowings
Bank loans
Commercial paper
Fixed-rate notes
Cash flows relating to non-derivative financial liabilities

Year ended 31 December 2018

Total Group
Forward foreign currency contracts – net outflow
Cash flows relating to derivative financial liabilities
Trade & other payables excluding statutory liabilities & deferred income
Obligations under finance leases
Bank overdrafts & short-term borrowings
Bank loans
Commercial paper
Fixed-rate notes
Cash flows relating to non-derivative financial liabilities

Less than 1 
year

1 to 2 years

2 to 5 years

More than 5 
years

£m
(8.9)
(8.9)
(511.0)
(46.9)
(1.7)
(310.5)
(190.8)
(25.6)
(1,086.5)
(1,095.4)

£m
0.4
0.4
–
(41.1)
–
(166.7)
–
(25.6)
(233.4)
(233.0)

£m
–
–
–
(62.5)
–
–
–
(615.0)
(677.5)
(677.5)

£m
–
–
–
(68.3)
–
–
–
–
(68.3)
(68.3)

Less than 1 
year

1 to 2 years

2 to 5 years

More than 5 
years

£m
(15.9)
(15.9)
(645.4)
(1.0)
(1.9)
(120.3)
(498.0)
(194.4)
(1,459.1)
(1,476.9)

£m
(0.3)
(0.3)
(0.8)
(0.9)
–
–
–
(26.6)
(28.3)
(29.6)

£m
0.4
0.4
–
(0.5)
–
–
–
(666.5)
(667.0)
(666.6)

£m
–
–
–
(0.1)
–
–
–
–
(0.1)
(0.1)

Total

£m
(8.5)
(8.5)
(511.0)
(218.8)
(1.7)
(477.2)
(190.8)
(666.2)
(2,065.7)
(2,074.2)

Total

£m
(15.8)
(15.8)
(646.2)
(2.5)
(1.9)
(120.3)
(498.0)
(887.5)
(2,154.5)
(2,172.2)

Credit risk
The Group is exposed to credit risk to the extent of non-payment by either its customers or the counterparties to its derivative financial instruments.

The Group’s credit risk is primarily attributable to its trade receivables with risk spread over a large number of countries and customers, with 
no significant concentration of risk. Where appropriate, the Group endeavours to minimise risk by the use of trade finance instruments such as 
letters of credit and insurance. In addition, applicable credit worthiness checks are undertaken with external credit rating agencies before entering 
into contracts with customers and credit limits are set as appropriate and enforced. As shown in note 17, the trade receivables presented in the 
balance sheet are net of the expected credit loss allowance. Refer to those notes for detail of the loss allowance calculation.

In certain circumstances, operating entities are permitted to make use of invoice discounting facilities to reduce counterparty credit risk. 
The arrangements are assessed to ensure the entity has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the receivables, 
allowing the derecognition of the receivables in their entirety. The cash when received is recognised as a working capital movement and 
presented in cash generated from operations. The total amount of receivables invoices discounted at the year end and therefore derecognised 
was £21.6m (2018: £38.8m) and this is reflected in the working capital cash flows section of note 25. The fees incurred as part of the invoice 
discounting programme are as shown in note 6.

The Group’s exposure to the credit risk of financial instruments is limited by the adherence to counterparty credit limits, and by only trading 
with counterparties that have an investment grade credit rating or better at contract inception, based upon ratings provided by the major credit 
rating agencies. Exposures to those counterparties are regularly reviewed and, when the market view of a counterparty’s credit quality changes, 
adjusted as considered appropriate.

The maximum exposure to credit risk is equal to the carrying value of the financial assets of the Group.

196

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

30. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The primary objective of the Group’s capital management is to ensure that it maintains robust capital ratios in order to support its business and 
maximise shareholder value.

The Group manages its capital structure and makes adjustments in light of changes in economic conditions. To maintain or adjust the capital 
structure, the Group may adjust the dividend payment to Shareholders, return capital to Shareholders or issue new shares. The Group’s banking 
arrangements include bi-annual financial covenants based on adjusted net debt to EBITDA (not greater than 3.5) and adjusted interest cover (not 
less than 3.5). The Group has complied with these covenants throughout the reporting period and monitors capital using the following indicators.

Adjusted net debt to EBITDA cover
Net debt to EBITDA comprises net debt divided by operating profit from total operations before exceptional items, intangibles amortisation, 
depreciation and excluding the impact of IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. 

For the purposes of the covenants required by the Group’s lenders, the net debt is to be converted at the exchange rate used in the preparation 
of the Group’s Consolidated Income Statement and cash flows, i.e. average rate. In addition, results of businesses acquired in the financial year 
have to be included as if the acquisitions occurred at the start of the financial year, while the results of businesses disposed of in the year are to 
be excluded.

The Group considers that the ratio of adjusted net debt to EBITDA is the key metric from a capital management perspective and seeks 
to maintain the ratio below 2.0 times. Given the recent downturn in oil and gas markets, the metric is currently 2.4 times and remains 
actively managed.

Net debt at average exchange rates (£m)
Adjusted operating (loss) profit (£m)
Exceptional items included in operating profit (£m)
Depreciation and intangibles amortisation (£m)
Adjusted EBITDA (£m)
Net debt to EBITDA cover (ratio)

2019
970.9
(329.1)
596.0
140.7
407.6
2.4

2018
1,085.6
125.2
161.1
187.6
473.9
2.3

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Adjusted interest cover
Interest cover comprises operating profit from total operations before exceptional items and intangibles amortisation divided by net finance costs 
(excluding exceptional items and other finance costs), excluding the impact of IFRS 16 ‘Leases’.

Adjusted operating profit before exceptional items & intangibles amortisation (£m)
Net finance costs (excluding exceptional items and other finance costs) (£m)
Adjusted interest cover (ratio)

2019
345.2
37.2
9.3

2018
401.8
33.8
11.9

Gearing ratio
Gearing comprises net debt divided by total equity. Net debt comprises cash and short-term deposits and interest-bearing loans and borrowings 
(note 25).

Net debt (£m)
Total equity (£m)
Gearing ratio (%)

2019
1,156.5
1,513.4
76.4

2018
1,126.5
2,148.9
52.4

197

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

31. EXCHANGE RATES
The principal exchange rates applied in the preparation of these financial statements were as follows.

Average rate (per £)
US Dollar
Australian Dollar
Euro
Canadian Dollar
United Arab Emirates Dirham
Chilean Peso
South African Rand
Brazilian Real
Russian Rouble

Closing rate (per £)
US Dollar
Australian Dollar
Euro
Canadian Dollar
United Arab Emirates Dirham
Chilean Peso
South African Rand
Brazilian Real
Russian Rouble

2019
1.28
1.84
1.14
1.69
4.69
897.37
18.43
5.03
82.53

2019
1.33
1.89
1.18
1.72
4.87
994.76
18.54
5.33
82.29

2018
1.34
1.79
1.13
1.73
4.89
855.87
17.65
4.87
83.66

2018
1.27
1.81
1.11
1.74
4.68
884.36
18.33
4.95
88.40

198

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

COMPANY BALANCE SHEET
AT 31 DECEMBER 2019

ASSETS
Non-current assets
Intangible assets
Property, plant & equipment
Investments in subsidiaries
Deferred tax assets
Trade & other receivables
Derivative financial instruments
Total non-current assets
Current assets
Trade & other receivables
Derivative financial instruments
Cash & short-term deposits
Total current assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade & other payables
Derivative financial instruments
Provisions
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Interest-bearing loans & borrowings
Derivative financial instruments
Provisions 
Deferred tax liabilities
Retirement benefit plan deficits
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
NET ASSETS
CAPITAL & RESERVES
Share capital
Share premium 
Merger reserve
Treasury shares
Capital redemption reserve
Special reserve
Retained earnings
TOTAL EQUITY

31 December 
2019
£m

31 December 
2018
£m

Notes

3
4
5
6
7
9

7
9

10
9
12

11
9
12
6
8

13

0.2
12.0
3,725.0
14.0
39.5
4.7
3,795.4

128.3
23.5
31.5
183.3
3,978.7

1,663.4
31.0
0.2
1,694.6

959.9
0.3
0.1
–
69.3
1,029.6
2,724.2
1,254.5

32.5
582.3
332.6
(0.5)
0.5
1.8
305.3
1,254.5

0.1
3.7
4,435.2
12.3
41.6
2.1
4,495.0

229.7
27.6
36.1
293.4
4,788.4

2,422.8
54.8
0.8
2,478.4

911.7
0.6
0.3
3.4
72.1
988.1
3,466.5
1,321.9

32.5
582.3
332.6
(2.1)
0.5
1.8
374.3
1,321.9

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

In accordance with the concession granted under section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Income Statement and Statement of 
Comprehensive Income of the Company has not been separately presented in these financial statements. The profit of the Company was 
£53.8m (2018: £22.8m).

The financial statements on pages 199-215 were approved by the Board of Directors on 26 February 2020.

JON STANTON 
Director   

JOHN HEASLEY
Director

199

 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

COMPANY STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2019

Share 
capital
£m
28.1
–
–
–

Share 
premium
£m
197.9
–
–
–

Treasury 
shares
£m
(5.9)
–
–
–

Capital 
redemption 
reserve
£m
0.5
–
–
–

Special 
reserve
£m
1.8
–
–
–

Retained 
earnings
£m
409.5
22.8
59.2
(10.1)

At 31 December 2017
Profit for the period
Remeasurements on defined benefit plans
Tax relating to other comprehensive expense
Total net comprehensive income for 
the period
Issue of shares
Cost of share-based payments inclusive of 
tax charge
Dividends (note 2)
Purchase of shares
Exercise of share-based payments
At 31 December 2018
Profit for the period
Remeasurements on defined benefit plans
Tax relating to other comprehensive expense
Total net comprehensive income for the 
period
Cost of share-based payments inclusive of 
tax charge
Dividends (note 2)
Purchase of shares
Exercise of share-based payments
At 31 December 2019

–
4.4

–
–
–
–
32.5
–
–
–

–

–
–
–
–
32.5

Total 
equity
£m
641.3
22.8
59.2
(10.1)

71.9
712.0

8.3
(110.8)
(0.8)
–
1,321.9
53.8
(3.4)
0.6

71.9
–

8.3
(110.8)
–
(4.6)
374.3
53.8
(3.4)
0.6

51.0

51.0

13.3
(121.7)
–
(11.6)
305.3

13.3
(121.7)
(10.0)
–
1,254.5

–
–

–
–
–
–
0.5
–
–
–

–

–
–
–
–
0.5

–
–

–
–
–
–
1.8
–
–
–

–

–
–
–
–
1.8

Merger 
reserve
£m
9.4
–
–
–

–
323.2

–
–
–
–
332.6
–
–
–

–
384.4

–
–
–
–
582.3
–
–
–

–
–

–
–
(0.8)
4.6
(2.1)
–
–
–

–

–

–

–
–
–
–
582.3

–
–
–
–
332.6

–
–
(10.0)
11.6
(0.5)

200

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Authorisation of financial statements and statement of compliance
The company financial statements of The Weir Group PLC (the ‘Company’) for the year ended 31 December 2019 (‘2019’) were approved and 
authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Directors on 26 February 2020. The comparative information is presented for the year 
ended 31 December 2018 (‘2018’). 

The Weir Group PLC is a public limited company limited by shares and incorporated in Scotland, United Kingdom and is listed on the London 
Stock Exchange.

The company financial statements of The Weir Group PLC have been prepared on a going concern basis under the historic cost convention and 
in accordance with FRS 101 and applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006. The following disclosure exemptions from 
the requirements of IFRS have been consistently applied in the preparation of these financial statements, in accordance with FRS 101:

i)  Disclosures required by paragraphs 45(b) and 46-52 of IFRS 2 ‘Share-based payment’ can be found in note 27 to the Group 

ii) 

financial statements;
IFRS 7 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’ exemption has been taken as a result of the disclosures in note 29 to the Group 
financial statements;
IAS 7 ‘Statement of cash flows’;

iii) 
iv)  Disclosure of key management compensation as required by paragraph 17 of IAS 24 ‘Related party disclosures’; 
v)  Disclosure of related party transactions with wholly owned subsidiaries as required by IAS 24 ‘Related party disclosures’;
vi)  Paragraph 38 of IAS 1 ‘Presentation of financial statements’ comparative information requirements in respect of paragraph 79(a)(iv) of IAS 1; 

paragraph 73(e) of IAS 16 ‘Property, Plant & Equipment’; and paragraph 118(e) of IAS 38 ‘Intangible Assets’;

vii)  Paragraph 10(d), 10(f), 16, 38A, 38B, 38C, 38D, 40A, 40B, 40C, 40D, 111 and paragraphs 134-136, of IAS 1 ‘Presentation of financial 

statements’; and

viii) Paragraphs 52 and 58 of IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. 

The Company is the parent of The Weir Group PLC. Its principal activity is to act as a holding company for the Group and perform the head 
office function.

The accounting policies which follow are consistent with those of the previous period with the exception of IFRS 16: ‘Leases’, as discussed 
below. The other new standards, amendments and interpretations listed below are not considered to have a material impact on the Financial 
Statements of the Company.

The International Accounting Standards Board and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee have issued the following 
standards, amendments and interpretations, which are considered relevant to the Company, with an effective date after the period covered by 
these financial statements.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

International Accounting Standards (IAS/IFRS)
Amendment to IFRS 3 ‘Business combinations’ 
Amendment to IAS 1 and IAS 8 regarding the definition of materiality 
Amendment to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 regarding interest rate benchmark reform

*  Not yet endorsed for use in the European Union.

Effective date for periods commencing
1 January 2020*
1 January 2020
1 January 2020

The above amendments will be adopted in accordance with their effective dates and have not been adopted in these financial statements. 
The amendments and improvements which have not yet been endorsed are not anticipated to have a significant financial impact.

IFRS 16 ‘Leases’
The Company adopted IFRS 16 on 1 January 2019. The standard has resulted in several current operating leases being recognised on the balance 
sheet, as the distinction between operating and finance leases is removed. The Company has applied the modified retrospective transition 
method, and consequently comparative information is not restated. 

Within opening balances as at 1 January 2019, the Company has recognised £8.8m of continuing right-of-use assets. A corresponding continuing 
IFRS 16 lease liability of £10.9m has been recognised, representing the obligation to make lease payments. Right-of-use assets have been 
initially valued as equal to lease liabilities, with subsequent adjustments made to reflect rent free periods recognised on balance sheet at 
31 December 2018.

The balance sheet transition impact by line item on the closing 2018 Company Balance Sheet is shown in the table. 

201

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Impact of IFRS 16 transition on 2018 Company Balance Sheet

Property, plant & equipment
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings (total)
Trade & other payables
Other
NET ASSETS

31 December 2018 
£m
3.7
(911.7)
(2,422.8)
4,652.7
1,321.9

IFRS 16 impact 
£m
8.8
(10.9)
2.1
–
–

1 January 2019 
£m
12.5
(922.6)
(2,420.7)
4,652.7
1,321.9

For each lease, the lease term has been calculated as the non-cancellable period of the lease contract, except where the Company is reasonably 
certain that it will exercise contractual extension options. 

The Company has elected to use the following practical expedients allowed by the standard:

•  On initial application:

the use of hindsight when determining the lease term if the contract contains options to extend or terminate the lease;

i) 
ii)  the exclusion of initial direct costs from the measurement of the right-of-use asset; 
iii)  IFRS 16 has only been applied to contracts that were previously classified as leases; 
iv)  reliance on previous assessments on whether leases are onerous instead of performing an impairment review; and
v) 

leases where the lease term ends within 12 months of the date of initial application of IFRS 16 are classified as short-term. 

•  Lease payments for contracts for which the underlying asset is of a low value have continued to be expensed in the income statement.

For operating leases now recognised on the balance sheet, the operating lease expenses have been replaced by a depreciation expense on the 
right-of-use assets recognised and an interest expense.

Where the interest rate implicit in the lease cannot be readily determined, the Company’s incremental borrowing rate will be used. 
The Company’s incremental borrowing rate is calculated by taking the government borrowing rate in any given currency and adding the estimated 
Company credit spreads for a variety of tenors. An interpolation is performed to obtain one rate for each of the major lease currencies based on 
the weighted average life of the lease book. The incremental borrowing rate applied at transition was:

•  Leases in GBP: 2.45%

The adoption of IFRS 16 in the year to 31 December 2019 resulted in an increase in depreciation of £0.9m and finance costs of £0.3m. 
Operating expenses decreased by £0.8m, being the 2018 lease expenses. 

For the period to 31 December 2019, the impact on profit before tax from continuing operations (before exceptional items and intangibles 
amortisation) compared to the prior year is a reduction of £0.4m partly due to the front loading of interest costs. 

The reconciliation from operating commitments disclosed under IAS 17 to the lease liability recognised on the balance sheet at 1 January 2019 is 
as follows:

Reconciliation from IAS 17 disclosure to IFRS 16 at 1 January 2019

Operating lease commitments at 31 December 2018 
Impact of IFRS 16 data review*
Operating lease commitments at 31 December 2018
Impact of discounting
Discounted operating lease commitments at 1 January 2019
Recognition exemption for leases of low value assets
Lease liabilities reported at 1 January 2019

*  As part of the transition to IFRS 16, an operating lease commitment was identified that had not been included in the 2018 Company Financial Statements operating lease 

commitments disclosure.

Total
£m
(12.5)
(0.8)
(13.3)
2.3
(11.0)
0.1
(10.9)

202

 
 
 
 
 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Use of estimates and judgements
The Company’s significant accounting policies are set out below. The preparation of the Company Financial Statements, in conformity with 
FRS 101, requires management to make judgements that affect the application of accounting policies and estimates that impact the reported 
amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expense. 

Management bases these judgements and estimates on a combination of past experience, professional expert advice and other evidence that 
is relevant to each individual circumstance. Actual results may differ from these judgements and estimates, which are reviewed on an ongoing 
basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised and in any future periods affected.

The area where management considers the more complex estimates are required is in respect of retirement benefits. The assumptions 
underlying the valuation of retirement benefit assets and liabilities include discount rates, inflation rates and mortality assumptions which are 
based on actuarial advice. Changes in these assumptions could have a material impact on the measurement of the Company’s retirement benefit 
obligations. Sensitivities to changes in key assumptions are provided in note 8.

Foreign currency translation
The presentational and functional currency of the Company is sterling. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the 
Company’s functional currency at the exchange rate ruling on the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign 
currencies are retranslated at the exchange rate ruling on the balance sheet date. Currency translation differences are recognised in the 
Income Statement. 

Revenue recognition
Revenue is the consideration received or receivable which reflects the amount expected to be received, mainly the transaction price. 
Revenue will only be recognised when the fulfilment of performance obligations is achieved. Revenue mainly relates to transactions with other 
entities within the Group, primarily in relation to management recharges. 

Property, plant & equipment
Property, plant & equipment comprises owned assets and right-of-use assets that do not meet the definition of investment property.

i. Owned assets
Owned property, plant & equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any recognised impairment losses. Depreciation of 
property, plant & equipment is provided on a straight-line basis so as to charge the cost less residual value, to the Income Statement over 
the expected useful life of the asset concerned, and is in the following ranges:

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Long leasehold land & buildings 
Office & computer equipment

20 years
3–10 years

ii. Right-of-use asset and lease liability
Policy applicable from 1 January 2019

At inception of a contract, the Company assesses whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract 
conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. To assess whether a contract conveys 
the right to control the use of an identified asset, the Company assesses whether it has both the right to obtain substantially all of the economic 
benefits from use of the identified asset and the right to direct the use of the identified asset throughout the period of use. The Company 
recognises a lease liability and right-of-use asset at the lease commencement date. 

The lease liability is initially measured as the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date, discounted using 
the interest rate implicit in the lease, or where the interest rate implicit in the lease cannot be readily determined, the Company’s incremental 
borrowing rate. Generally, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate. 

Lease payments consist of the following components: 

•  fixed payments, including in-substance fixed payments, less any lease incentives receivable; 
•  variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate; 
•  amounts expected to be payable by the lessee under residual value guarantees;
•  the exercise price of a purchase option (if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that option); and 
•  payments of penalties for terminating the lease (if the lease term reflects the lessee exercising the option to terminate the lease). 

The Company’s incremental borrowing rate is calculated by taking the government borrowing rate in any given currency and adding the estimated 
Company credit spreads for a variety of tenors. An interpolation is performed to obtain one rate for each of the major lease currencies based on 
the weighted average life of the lease book.

The right-of-use asset is measured as equal to the lease liability and adjusted for:

•  lease payments made to the lessor at or before the commencement date; 
•  lease incentives received; 
•  initial direct costs associated with the lease; and 
•  an initial estimate of restoration costs.

The right-of-use asset is depreciated using the straight-line method over the lease term. In addition, the right-of-use asset is periodically reduced 
by any impairment losses. 

203

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
The Company has adopted the exemption available for low value assets, with payments being recognised on a straight-line basis over the 
lease term. Leases relating to laptops, desktop computers, mobile phones, photocopiers, printers and other office equipment, where the asset 
value is less than £3,500 or the local currency equivalent have been treated as ‘low value’. Where the lease contract meets both ‘short-term’ 
and ‘low value’ exemptions, the lease is reported within expenses relating to short-term leases.

For each lease, the lease term has been calculated as the non-cancellable period of the lease contract, except where the Company is reasonably 
certain that it will exercise contractual extension options. In assessing whether a lessee is reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend a 
lease, or not to exercise an option to terminate a lease, the Company shall consider all relevant facts and circumstances that create an economic 
incentive for the lessee to exercise the option to extend the lease, or not to exercise the option to terminate the lease. In certain circumstances 
the Company will refer to the five year strategic plan period as an appropriate period to consider whether the ‘reasonably certain’ criteria are met.

Policy applicable before 1 January 2019

Under IAS 17 leases which transferred to the Company substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership of the leased asset were classified 
as finance leases. All other assets were classified as operating leases. 

Assets held under finance lease were included within property, plant and equipment, initially measured at their fair value or, if lower, the present 
value of the minimum lease payments, and a corresponding liability was recognised within obligations under finance leases. 

Operating lease rentals and any incentives receivable were recognised in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

Intangible assets
Intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and any recognised impairment losses.

The expected useful lives of acquired intangible assets are as follows:

Purchased software

4–8 years

Investments
Investments in subsidiaries are held at cost less accumulated impairment losses.

Loans are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

Post-employment benefits
Post-employment benefits comprise pension benefits provided to certain current and former employees in the UK.

For defined benefit pension plans, the annual service cost is calculated using the projected unit credit method and is recognised over the future 
service lives of participating employees, in accordance with the advice of qualified actuaries. Current service cost and administration expenses 
are recognised in operating costs and net interest on net pension liability is recognised in finance costs.

The finance cost recognised in the income statement in the period reflects the net interest on the net pension liability. This represents the change 
in the net pension liability resulting from the passage of time, and is determined by applying the discount rate to the opening net liability, taking 
into account employer contributions paid into the plan, and hence reducing the net liability, during the period.

Past service costs resulting from enhanced benefits are recognised immediately in the income statement. Actuarial gains and losses, 
which represent differences between interest on the plan assets, experience on the benefit obligation and the effect of changes in actuarial 
assumptions, are recognised in full in other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur.

The defined benefit liability or asset recognised in the balance sheet comprises the net total for each plan of the present value of the benefit 
obligation, using a discount rate based on yields at the balance sheet date on appropriate high-quality corporate bonds that have maturity dates 
approximating the terms of the Company’s obligations and are denominated in the currency in which the benefits are expected to be paid, 
minus the fair value of the plan assets, if any, at the balance sheet date. The balance sheet amount recognised is limited to the present value 
of economic benefits which the Company expects to recover by way of refunds or a reduction in future contributions. In order to calculate the 
present value of economic benefits, consideration is also given to any minimum funding requirements.

For defined contribution plans, the cost represents the Company’s contributions to the plans and these are charged to the income statement in 
the period in which they fall due.

Share-based payments
Equity settled share-based incentives are provided to employees under the Group’s Share Reward Plan (SRP), formerly the Long Term Incentive 
Plan (LTIP), the Weir ShareBuilder Plan (WSBP) and as a consequence of occasional one-off conditional awards made to employees. 

The fair value of SRP awards and one-off conditional awards at the date of the grant is calculated using appropriate option pricing models and 
the cost is recognised on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Adjustments are made to reflect expected and actual forfeitures during the 
vesting period due to failure to satisfy service or performance conditions. The conditions of the SRP which took effect in 2018 are summarised in 
the Directors’ Remuneration Policy, which can be found on the Company’s website at www.corporategovernance.weir.

The fair value of WSBP awards at grant date is calculated as the share price at the date of the grant less an adjustment for loss of reinvestment 
return on the dividend equivalent. There are no performance conditions attached to these awards but participants who leave the Company 
prior to vesting lose their right to the awards. The terms of the share awards granted under the WSBP are set out on the plan’s website at 
www.sharebuilder.weir.

204

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial assets and liabilities
The Company’s principal financial assets and liabilities, other than derivatives, comprise bank overdrafts, short-term borrowings, loans and  
fixed-rate notes, commercial paper, cash and short-term deposits. The Company also has other financial assets and liabilities such as trade 
receivables and trade payables which arise directly from its operations.

A financial asset is generally derecognised when the contract that gives rise to it is settled, sold, cancelled or expires.

A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires. Where an existing financial liability 
is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such 
an exchange or modification is treated as a de-recognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability, such that the difference in 
the respective carrying amounts together with any costs or fees incurred are recognised in profit or loss. Under IFRS 9, where the modification 
is not substantial, the modified cash flows are discounted at the original effective interest rate to determine a revised carrying amount of the 
liability, with any difference in carrying amount recognised in the income statement.

Derivative financial instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments, principally forward foreign currency contracts, to reduce its exposure to exchange rate 
movements. The Company does not hold or issue derivatives for speculative or trading purposes.

Derivative financial instruments are recognised as assets or liabilities measured at their fair values at the balance sheet date. The fair value of 
forward foreign currency contracts is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows based on spot and forward foreign 
exchange rates. The fair value of interest rate swaps and cross currency swaps is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash 
flows based on interest rate curves, spot foreign exchange rates and counterparty and own credit risk. Changes in their fair values have been 
recognised in the income statement and presented within operating profit or finance costs dependent on their nature.

Treasury shares
The Weir Group PLC shares held by the Company are classified in Shareholders’ equity as treasury shares and are recognised at cost. 
Consideration received for the sale of such shares is also recognised in equity, with any difference between the proceeds from sale and the 
original cost being taken directly to revenue reserves. No gain or loss is recognised in the total comprehensive income on the purchase, sale, 
issue or cancellation of equity shares.

Taxation
Current tax is the amount of tax payable or recoverable in respect of the taxable profit or loss for the period.

Deferred tax is recognised on temporary differences between the carrying amount of an asset or liability in the balance sheet and its tax base 
with the following exceptions:

i) 

ii) 

 Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and joint ventures, except where the timing 
of the reversal of the temporary difference can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the 
foreseeable future.
 A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can 
be utilised.

Deferred tax liabilities represent tax payable in future periods in respect of taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets represent tax 
recoverable in future periods in respect of deductible temporary differences, the carry forward of unutilised tax losses and the carry forward of 
unused tax credits. Deferred tax is measured on an undiscounted basis using the tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively 
enacted at the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the deferred tax asset is realised or the deferred tax liability is settled.

Current and deferred tax is recognised in the income statement except if it relates to an item recognised directly in equity, in which case it is 
recognised directly in equity.

2. PROFIT ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY
The profit dealt with in the financial statements of the Company was £53.8m (2018: £22.8m). The corporate tax credit dealt with in the financial 
statements of the Company was £4.6m (2018: £14.5m).

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Dividends paid & proposed

Declared & paid during the period
Equity dividends on ordinary shares
Final dividend for 2018: 30.45p (2017: 29.0p)
Interim dividend for 2019: 16.5p (2018: 15.75p)

Proposed for approval by Shareholders at the Annual General Meeting
Final dividend for 2019: 30.45p (2018: 30.45p)

2019
£m

2018
£m

78.9
42.8
121.7

69.9
40.9
110.8

79.1

79.0

Up until May 2018, The Weir Group PLC Scrip Dividend Scheme allowed Shareholders on record the opportunity to elect to receive dividends 
in the form of new fully paid ordinary shares. In 2018, participation in the Scheme resulted in shares with a value of £31.2m being issued and a 
cash dividend of £38.7m for the 2017 final dividend. The 2018 interim and final dividends were only issued in cash following closure of the Scrip 
Dividend Scheme.

205

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

2. PROFIT (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY continued
The proposed dividend is based on the number of shares in issue, excluding treasury shares held, at the date that the financial statements were 
approved and authorised for issue. The final dividend may differ due to increases or decreases in the number of shares in issue between the date 
of approval of this Annual Report and Financial Statements and the record date for the final dividend.

Employee benefits expense
Wages & salaries
Social security costs
Pension costs
  Defined benefit plans (note 8)
  Defined contribution plans
Share-based payments – equity settled transactions

2019
£m

21.6
3.1

–
0.6
12.9
38.2

2018
£m

20.1
2.8

6.4
0.5
8.6
38.4

During 2019, the average number of people employed by the Company was 246 (2018: 183).

Directors
Details of Directors’ remuneration, benefits and LTIP awards are included in the Remuneration Report on pages 102-125, and in note 28 to the 
Group Consolidated Financial Statements.

Auditors’ remuneration
The total fees payable by the Company to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) for work performed in respect of the audit of the Company were 
£21,630 (2018: £20,600). Fees paid to PwC for non-audit services to the Company itself are not disclosed in these financial statements as the 
Group’s Consolidated Financial Statements, in which the Company is included, are required to disclose such fees on a consolidated basis. 

Fees payable by the Company to Ernst & Young LLP for work performed in respect of the audit of the pension scheme were £36,550. 

3. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Cost
At 31 December 2018
Additions
At 31 December 2019
Aggregate amortisation
At 31 December 2018
Charge for period
At 31 December 2019

Net book value at 31 December 2018

Net book value at 31 December 2019

4. PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT

Cost
At 31 December 2018
Transition adjustment (note 1)
At 1 January 2019
Additions
At 31 December 2019
Aggregate depreciation
At 31 December 2018
Charge for period
At 31 December 2019

Net book value at 31 December 2018

Net book value at 31 December 2019

Purchased 
software 
total
£m

1.0
0.2
1.2

0.9
0.1
1.0

0.1

0.2

Total
£m

6.1
8.8
14.9
0.7
15.6

2.4
1.2
3.6

3.7

–
–
–
0.2
0.2

–
–
–

–

0.2

12.0

Owned long 
leasehold 
land & 
buildings
£m

Owned  
office & 
computer 
equipment
£m

Right-of-
use land & 
buildings
£m

Right-of-
use plant & 
equipment
£m

3.7
–
3.7
–
3.7

0.5
0.2
0.7

3.2

3.0

2.4
–
2.4
0.5
2.9

1.9
0.1
2.0

0.5

0.9

–
8.8
8.8
–
8.8

–
0.9
0.9

–

7.9

206

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Right-of-use assets
The Company leases buildings, a vehicle and IT equipment. The current and non-current lease liabilities are disclosed in note 11. The following 
table shows the breakdown of the lease expense between amounts charged to operating profit and amounts charged to finance costs in 
the year.

Depreciation of right-of-use assets
Charge to operating profit
Finance cost – interest expense related to lease liabilities
Charge to profit before tax from continuing operations

The total cash outflow in the year is £1.0m.

5. INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES

Cost
At 31 December 2018
Additions
Disposal
Settlement
Exchange
At 31 December 2019
Impairment
At 31 December 2018
Impairment of investment in subsidiary

At 31 December 2019

Net book value at 31 December 2018

Net book value at 31 December 2019

2019
£m

0.9
0.9
0.3
1.2

Subsidiaries 
shares
£m

Loans
£m

Total
£m

2,613.9
1,635.8
(674.9)
–
–
3,574.8

326.6
985.7

1,312.3

2,287.3

2,262.5

2,153.3
920.3
–
(1,552.4)
(53.3)
1,467.9

5.4
–

5.4

2,147.9

1,462.5

4,767.2
2,556.1
(674.9)
(1,552.4)
(53.3)
5,042.7

332.0
985.7

1,317.7

4,435.2

3,725.0

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

The subsidiaries and joint ventures of the Company are listed on pages 216-223.

During the year the Company carried out a corporate restructure for internal financing purposes. This resulted in a series of equity investments of 
£1,596.3m and disposals of £635.8m. Related to this the Company received a dividend of £940.0m from one of its subsidiaries and subsequently 
impaired its investment in the subsidiary by £949.2m.

The Company carried out an exercise to rationalise the number of its legal entities. This involved an equity investment of £0.4m, dividends 
received of £114.5m and a subsequent impairment of its investment in some of those entities by £36.5m.

There was a restructure of the Company’s investments related to the disposal of Flow Control, resulting in investment additions and disposals 
to the value of £39.1m each.

Over the term of the loans, the Company accounts for its credit risk by appropriately providing for expected credit losses on a timely basis. 
The majority of the Company’s loans are repayable on demand by the Company. In calculating the expected credit loss allowance of repayable 
on demand loans, the Company considers the financial position and internal forecasts of each subsidiary and their ability to repay on request, 
or over time. For those loans repayable on maturity, expected credit losses are calculated using market-implied probabilities of default and 
loss-given-default estimations.

The Company considers the probability of default upon initial recognition of an asset and subsequently whether there has been a significant 
increase in credit risk on an ongoing basis throughout each reporting period. To assess whether there is a significant increase in credit risk, the 
Company compares the risk of a default occurring on the asset as at the reporting date with the risk of default as at the date of initial recognition. 
The primary indicators considered are actual or expected significant adverse changes in business and financial conditions that are expected to 
cause a significant change to the borrower’s ability to meet its obligations.

Independent of the primary indicators above, a significant increase in credit risk is presumed if a debtor is more than 30 days past due in making 
a contractual payment. A default on a financial asset is considered to occur when the counterparty fails to make contractual payments within 90 
days of when they fall due. A write-off is considered to be required when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery, or when a debtor fails to 
make contractual payments greater than 120 days past due. Where loans or receivables have been written-off, the Company continues to engage 
in enforcement activity to attempt to recover the receivable due. Where recoveries are made, these are recognised in the income statement.

As at 31 December 2019 and 1 January 2019, the loss allowances for all loans to subsidiaries were measured at an amount equal to 12-month 
expected credit losses. This did not result in a material change to the loss allowance on 1 January 2019 for the loans, and as such no adjustment 
has been recorded and comparative figures have not been restated.

207

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

5. INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES continued 

The closing loss allowances for loans due from subsidiaries as at 31 December 2019 reconcile to the opening loss allowances as follows:

31 December 2018 – calculated under IAS 39
Amounts restated through opening retained earnings
Opening loss allowance as at 1 January 2019 – calculated under IFRS 9 (2018) / IAS 39 (2017)
At 31 December 2019

6. DEFERRED TAX

Deferred income tax assets
Other timing differences
Retirement benefits
Deferred income tax assets

Deferred income tax liabilities

Other timing differences
Retirement benefits
Deferred income tax

Deferred income tax assets
Recoverable after one year

Deferred income tax liabilities
Settled after one year

£m
5.4
–
5.4
5.4

2018
£m

–
12.3
12.3

(3.4)

(3.4)
12.3
8.9

12.3
12.3

(3.4)
(3.4)

2019
£m

2.2
11.8
14.0

–

2.2
11.8
14.0

14.0
14.0

–
–

7. TRADE & OTHER RECEIVABLES
Trade & other receivables presented as non-current on the face of the Company Balance Sheet of £39.5m (2018: £41.6m) are in respect of a 
prepayment recognised as a result of the pension funding partnership structure. Further information pertaining to this arrangement can be found 
in note 8.

Amounts recoverable within one year
Amounts owed by subsidiaries
Tax receivable
Other debtors
Prepayments & accrued income

2019
£m

103.1
21.2
2.9
1.1
128.3

2018
£m

204.4
18.8
5.6
0.9
229.7

Amounts owed by subsidiaries relate to management recharges in respect of support services provided. Intercompany balances are typically 
managed on a Group basis, and the Company’s credit risk management practices reflect this. The Group applies the IFRS 9 simplified approach 
to measuring expected credit losses, which uses a lifetime expected loss allowance for all such trade receivables.

The amounts owed by subsidiaries do not carry an interest charge, and it is the Company’s expectation that materially all the amounts owed 
by subsidiaries are fully recoverable over time. Expected credit losses at both 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019 are therefore immaterial, 
and there has been no material change to the expected loss allowance during the year.

208

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

8. RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company has two funded defined benefit plans (the Main Plan and the Executive Plan) and an unfunded retirement benefit plan for retired 
Directors. The Company also operates a defined contribution plan. Contributions to the defined contribution arrangement are in addition to those 
set out below and are charged directly to the income statement. 

For the defined benefit plans, benefits are related to service and final salary. The Main Plan closed to future accrual of benefits effective from 
30 June 2015.

The weighted average duration of the expected benefit payments from the Main Plan is around 17 years and from the Executive Plan it is around 
14 years.

The current funding target for the UK plans is to maintain assets equal to the value of the accrued benefits. The Main Plan holds insurance 
policies in respect of a significant proportion of deferred and retired pensioners. The Executive Plan entered into an insurance contract in 2017 
which will match the liabilities of the plan in full.

The defined benefit plans expose the Company to a number of risks:

Uncertainty in benefit payments
The value of the Company’s liabilities for the defined benefit plans will ultimately depend on the amount of benefits paid out. This in turn will 
depend on the level of inflation (for those benefits that are subject to some form of inflation protection) and how long individuals live. This risk 
is significantly reduced through the insurance policies held.

Volatility in asset values
The Company is exposed to future movements in the values of assets held in the defined benefit plans to meet future uninsured 
benefit payments.

Uncertainty in cash funding
The regulatory framework in the UK requires the Trustees and Company to agree upon the assumptions underlying the funding target, and 
then to agree upon the necessary contributions required to recover any deficit at the valuation date. There is a risk to the Company that adverse 
experience could lead to a requirement for the Company to make considerable contributions to recover any deficit. This risk is significantly 
reduced through the insurance policies held. In addition, the Company is also exposed to adverse changes in pension regulation.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Assumptions
The significant actuarial assumptions used for accounting purposes reflect prevailing market conditions and are as follows:

Significant actuarial assumptions:
Discount rate (% pa)
Retail Prices inflation assumption (% pa)

Post-retirement mortality (life expectancies in years):
  Current pensioners at 65 – male
  Current pensioners at 65 – female
  Future pensioners at 65 – male
  Future pensioners at 65 – female

Other related actuarial assumptions:
Rate of increases for pensions in payment (% pa)
  Pre 6 April 2006 service
  Post 5 April 2006 service
Consumer Prices inflation assumption (% pa)

2019

2018

2.1
3.0

21.1
23.1
22.5
24.6

2.9
2.0
1.9

2.9
3.2

21.6
23.5
23.0
25.1

3.1
2.1
2.1

The assumptions used to determine end-of-year benefit obligations are also used to calculate the following period’s cost. 

The post-retirement mortality assumptions allow for expected increases in longevity. The ‘current’ disclosures above relate to assumptions 
based on longevity (in years) following retirement at the balance sheet date, with ‘future’ being that relating to a member retiring in 2040 
(in 20 years’ time).

209

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

8. RETIREMENT BENEFITS continued
The assets and liabilities of the plans are as follows. 

Plan assets at fair value
Equities (quoted)
Diversified Growth Funds (primarily quoted)
Corporate bonds (quoted)
Government bonds (quoted)
Insurance policies (unquoted)
Private Debt (unquoted)
Cash (quoted)
Fair value of plan assets
Present value of funded obligations
Net funded obligations
Present value of unfunded obligations
Net liability
Plan in deficit

2019
£m

193.8
62.5
41.1
114.1
364.7
9.8
28.4
814.4
(882.3)
(67.9)
(1.4)
(69.3)
(69.3)

2018
£m

177.5
55.5
37.3
109.2
360.9
–
8.7
749.1
(819.8)
(70.7)
(1.4)
(72.1)
(72.1)

Of the government bonds held at 31 December 2019, 35% are fixed interest bonds. The pension plans have not directly invested in any of the 
Company’s own financial instruments, or in properties or other assets used by the Company.

The investment strategy for the UK is to hold equities and other return-seeking assets such as diversified growth funds and a mixture of bonds 
to meet the assessed value of the benefits promised for the non-insured deferred pensioners. For the remaining deferred pensioners and the 
bulk of pensioners currently receiving their benefit, the liabilities are backed by insurance policies and suitable bonds.

The change in net liabilities recognised in the balance sheet is comprised as follows.

Opening net liabilities
Expense charged to profit & loss
Amount recognised in Statement of Comprehensive Income
Employer contributions
Closing net liabilities

2019
£m
(72.1)
(1.9)
(3.4)
8.1
(69.3)

The amounts recognised in the income statement and in the Statement of Comprehensive Income for the period are analysed as follows.

Recognised in the Income Statement
Past service cost
Administrative expenses
Included in operating loss
Interest on net pension liability
Total expense charged to profit & loss

Recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income
Actual return on plan assets
Less: interest on plan assets

Other actuarial (losses) gains due to:
  Changes in financial assumptions
  Changes in demographic assumptions
  Experience on benefit obligations
Actuarial losses recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income

2019
£m

–
–
–
(1.9)
(1.9)

95.5
(21.4)
74.1

(97.9)
20.4
–
(3.4)

2018
£m
(125.1)
(9.3)
59.2
3.1
(72.1)

2018
£m

(6.3)
(0.1)
(6.4)
(2.9)
(9.3)

(22.7)
(19.1)
(41.8)

70.2
18.0
12.8
59.2

Past service cost and administration expenses are recognised in operating costs and interest on net pension liability is recognised in other 
finance costs. 

Pension contributions are determined with the advice of independent qualified actuaries on the basis of regular valuations using the projected 
unit method. The Company made special contributions of £8.0m in 2019 (2018: £3.0m) in addition to the Company’s regular contributions. 

210

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

In 2015, the Company entered into a pension funding partnership structure under which it has contributed interests in a Scottish Limited 
Partnership (‘SLP’) for the Main Plan. The Main Plan’s interests in the SLP reduce the deficit on a funding basis, although the agreement will not 
affect the position directly on an FRS 101 accounting basis as the investments held do not qualify as assets for FRS 101 purposes. As a partner in 
the SLP, the Main Plan is entitled to receive a share of the profits of the SLP once a year for 15 years, subject to conditions being met. The profits 
to be shared with the Plan will be reflected in the Company’s financial statements as a pension contribution. 

The latest actuarial funding valuation of the Main Plan as at 31 December 2017 was completed in 2019. Under the agreed recovery plan, the 
Company has agreed to contribute £4.3m in each year from 2019 to 2028 inclusive. These contributions are primarily funded by the income 
payments from the SLP described above. The contributions are subject to an annual review mechanism, and will temporarily cease if the Main 
Plan’s funding level on a funding basis exceeds 105%. 

The Trustees of the UK Executive Scheme entered into a full buy-in transaction with Scottish Widows in the third quarter of 2017, meaning all of 
the benefit payments due from the Executive Scheme are now covered by an insurance policy. There remains an outstanding premium payment 
(expected to be £1.1m) due from the Trustees to Scottish Widows, which is expected to be paid in 2020 following a data cleanse process to 
finalise the insurance policy data. The FRS 101 balance sheet at the 2019 year end therefore shows a deficit reflecting this payment due.

The Company has taken legal advice regarding its UK arrangements to confirm the accounting treatment under IFRIC 14 with regard to 
recognition of a current surplus and also recognition of a minimum funding requirement. This confirmed that there is no requirement to adjust 
the balance sheet and that recognition of a current surplus is appropriate on the basis that the Company has an unconditional right to a refund 
of a current (or projected future) surplus at some point in the future. For the same reason, there is no requirement for the Company to adjust 
the balance sheet to recognise the future agreed deficit recovery contributions. Having considered the position, taking account of the legal input 
received and noting that the Trustees of the UK arrangements do not have discretionary powers to unilaterally wind up the schemes without 
cause, the Directors of the Company have concluded that the Company has an unconditional right to a refund of any surplus. Amendments to the 
current version of IFRIC 14 are currently being considered. The legal advice received by the Company has confirmed that the above accounting 
treatment will not be affected by the current exposure draft of the revised IFRIC 14.

The total Company contributions for 2020 (including those expected from the SLP) are expected to be £5.4m.

Sensitivity analysis
Changes in key assumptions can have a significant effect on the reported net retirement benefit obligation and the income statement expense 
for 2020. The effects of changes in those assumptions are set out in the table below.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Discount rate
  Effect on defined benefit obligation of a 1.0% change
  Effect on net liability of a 1.0% change
RPI inflation (and associated assumptions)
  Effect on defined benefit obligation of a 1.0% change
  Effect on net liability of a 1.0% change
Life expectancy
  Effect on defined benefit obligation of a 1 year change
  Effect on net liability of a 1 year change

Increase
2019
£m

Decrease
2019
£m

Increase
2018
£m

Decrease
2018
£m

132.4
95.2

(99.1)
(65.5)

(31.1)
(15.1)

(159.9)
(118.0)

89.6
58.7

31.1
15.1

120.4
83.9

(91.0)
(57.9)

(28.8)
(13.0)

(144.8)
(103.7)

82.5
51.9

28.8
13.0

The impact on the net liability is significantly reduced as a result of the insurance policies held. In the absence of such policies, the impact on the 
net liability would be much closer to the significantly higher impact on the defined benefit obligation shown in the table.

These sensitivities have been calculated to show the movement in the defined benefit obligation and net liability in isolation and assume no 
other changes in market conditions at the accounting date. In practice, for example, a change in discount rate is unlikely to occur without any 
movement in the value of the invested (non-insurance policy) assets held by the plans.

211

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

8. RETIREMENT BENEFITS continued
Changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligations are analysed as follows.

Opening defined benefit obligations
Past service cost
Interest on benefit obligations
Benefits paid
Actuarial (losses) gains due to
  Changes in financial assumptions
  Changes in demographic assumptions
  Experience on benefit obligations
Closing defined benefit obligations

Changes in the fair value of plan assets are analysed as follows.

Opening plan assets
Interest on plan assets
Employer contributions
Administrative expenses
Benefits paid
Actual return on plan assets less interest on plan assets
Closing plan assets

9. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Non-current assets
Cross currency swaps
Forward foreign currency contracts

Current assets
Forward foreign currency contracts

Current liabilities
Forward foreign currency contracts

Non-current liabilities
Forward foreign currency contracts

2019
£m
(821.2)
–
(23.3)
38.3

(97.9)
20.4
–
(883.7)

2019
£m
749.1
21.4
8.1
–
(38.3)
74.1
814.4

2019
£m

4.1
0.6
4.7

23.5
23.5

(31.0)
(31.0)

(0.3)
(0.3)

2018
£m
(936.8)
(6.3)
(22.0)
42.9

70.2
18.0
12.8
(821.2)

2018
£m
811.7
19.1
3.1
(0.1)
(42.9)
(41.8)
749.1

2018
£m

1.4
0.7
2.1

27.6
27.6

(54.8)
(54.8)

(0.6)
(0.6)

The figures in the above table include derivative financial instruments where the counterparty is a subsidiary of The Weir Group PLC.

10. TRADE & OTHER PAYABLES

Bank overdrafts & short-term borrowings
Loans from subsidiaries (note 11)
Lease liability (note 11)
Amounts owed to subsidiaries
Other taxes & social security costs
Other creditors
Accruals & deferred income

212

2019
£m
490.0
1,125.8
1.1
14.3
1.2
7.6
23.4
1,663.4

2018
£m
662.0
1,683.6
–
30.9
1.4
15.2
29.7
2,422.8

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

11. INTEREST-BEARING LOANS & BORROWINGS

Amounts due are repayable as follows
Less than one year
– bank loans
– fixed-rate notes
– commercial paper
– loans from subsidiaries
– lease liability
More than one year but not more than two years
– bank loans
– loans from subsidiaries
– lease liability
More than two years but not more than five years
– bank loans
– fixed-rate notes
– loans from subsidiaries
– lease liability
More than five years
– lease liability

Less current instalments due on
– bank loans
– fixed-rate notes
– commercial paper
– loans from subsidiaries
– lease liability

2019
£m

2018
£m

299.6
–
190.5
1,125.8
1.1

158.3
65.3
0.8

–
595.4
131.7
2.2

–
164.6
497.2
1,683.6
–

–
–
–

120.0
619.4
172.3
–

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

6.2
2,576.9

–
3,257.1

(299.6)
–
(190.5)
(1,125.8)
(1.1)
959.9

–
(164.6)
(497.2)
(1,683.6)
–
911.7

The loans from subsidiaries with a maturity date greater than one year and less than two years are repayable in 2021 and have an interest rate 
of 6.25%. The loans from subsidiaries with a maturity date greater than two years and less than five years are repayable in 2023 and have an 
interest rate of 5.65%.

Details of the interest and repayment terms of the bank loans, fixed-rate notes and commercial paper can be found in note 19 to the Group 
financial statements.

12. PROVISIONS

At 31 December 2018
Additions
Utilised
At 31 December 2019

Current 2019
Non-current 2019
At 31 December 2019

Current 2018
Non-current 2018
At 31 December 2018 

213

Exceptional
rationalisation
£m
1.1
0.9
(1.7)
0.3

0.2
0.1
0.3

0.8
0.3
1.1

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Financial Statements

NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED

13. SHARE CAPITAL & RESERVES

Allotted, called up & fully paid
Ordinary shares of 12.5p each

Shares allotted
Issued during the period in respect of ESCO acquisition
Issued during the period in respect of scrip dividends

Treasury shares
At the beginning of the period
Purchase of shares in respect of equity settled share-based payments
Utilised during the period in respect of equity settled share-based payments
At the beginning and end of the period

Equity settled share-based payments
Share awards outstanding at the end of the period 

2019
£m

32.5

2018
£m

32.5

2019
Number  
million

2018
Number 
million

–
–

0.2
0.7
(0.9)
–

33.5
1.4

0.5
–
(0.3)
0.2

1.5

1.7

Merger reserve
The shares issued directly to ESCO Shareholders on 12 July 2018 qualified for merger relief under section 612 of the Companies Act 2006, 
resulting in an increase to the reserve of £323.2m. The merger reserve was originally created by the issue of new equity in relation to the 
acquisition of Delta Industrial Valves Inc. during 2015. 

Capital redemption reserve
The capital redemption reserve was created by a repurchase and cancellation of own shares during the 53 weeks ended 1 January 1999.

Special reserve
The premium of £1.8m arising on the issue of shares for the acquisition of the entire share capital of Liquid Gas Equipment Limited in 1988 has 
been credited to a special reserve in accordance with the merger relief provisions of the Companies Act 1985.

14. OPERATING LEASE COMMITMENTS
The Company has a commercial lease for a building with a lease term of 20 years. Future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable 
operating leases are shown in the table below for the year ended 31 December 2018. In 2019 this lease has been accounted for under IFRS 16. 
Lease commitments at 31 December 2019 are displayed in note 11. 

Less than 1 year
After 1 year but no more than 5 years
More than 5 years
Impact of IFRS 16 data review (note 1)

2018
(restated
note 1)
£m
0.8
3.0
8.7
0.8
13.3

15. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES & LEGAL CLAIMS
Guarantees
The Company has given guarantees in relation to the bank and other borrowings of certain subsidiary companies amounting to £819.3m 
(2018: £967.1m) of which £217.1m (2018: £213.3m) was utilised at 31 December 2019. These guarantees are treated as contingent liabilities until 
it becomes probable they will be called upon. The likelihood of the guarantees being called upon is considered remote. 

Legal claims
The Company and certain subsidiaries are, from time to time, parties to legal proceedings and claims which arise in the normal course 
of business. Provisions have been made where the Directors have assessed that a cash outflow is likely and they believe all other claims 
are remote.

214

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

16. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES

The Company has taken advantage of the exemption under paragraph 8(k) of FRS 101 not to disclose transactions with related parties that are 
wholly owned by a subsidiary of The Weir Group PLC. The following table provides the total amount of transactions which have been entered into 
with non-wholly owned related parties for the relevant financial year and outstanding balances at the period end.

Related party
Weir ABF LP

Weir Minerals (India) Private Ltd

Vulco SA

2019
2018
2019
2018
2019
2018

Group charges
£m
–
–
–
0.1
1.3
(0.5)

Amounts 
due by
£m
58.5
56.7
–
–
0.4
1.2

17. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
The description of the Group’s financial risk management objectives and policies is provided in note 29 to the Group financial statements.

These financial risk management objectives and policies also apply to the Company.

F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

215

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Shareholder Information

SUBSIDIARY UNDERTAKINGS

Company Name

Country

Registered Office address

Aislación Sismica Perú SA

Peru

Av. Separadora Industrial, N° 2201 Urb Vulcano Ate, Lima, Peru

Aspir Pty Ltd

Australia

1-5 Marden Street, Artarmon NSW 2064, Australia

Class name 

Ordinary

Ordinary

Bucyrus Blades de Mexico S.A. 
DE C.V.

Mexico

Calle 14, Manzana 4, Lote 4, Parque Industrial, Apartado Postal 129, 
Atlacomulco, Mexico

Fixed Capital,  
Variable Capital

Bucyrus Blades Inc.

United States C T Corporation System, 4400 Easton Commons Way, Suite 125, 

Common

Columbus, OH, 43219

Bucyrus Blades of Canada ULC

Canada

1800 - 510 West Georgia Street, Vancouver BC V6B 0M3, Canada

Ordinary-A

Capstead Systems Limited

England 
and Wales

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

CH Warman Asia Limited

Malta

93 Mill Street, Qormi, QRM3102, Malta

Comercializadora TEP Limitada

Chile

San José N° 815, San Bernardo, Santiago de Chile, Chile

Cunnington and Cooper Limited

England 
and Wales

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

Ordinary

Ordinary

N/A

Ordinary

Dongying Weir O&G Pump 
Products Co., Ltd.

China

No. 69 Dengzhou Road, Dongying Area, Dongying City, Shandong, 
China

N/A

Downhole Oiltools Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.

United States CT Corporation System, 808 West Seventh Street, Suite 930, Los 

Common A Stock

Angeles, CA, 90017

Electric Steel Foundry Co

United States 2141 NW 25th Avenue, Portland OR 97210, United States

Fixed Capital

EnviroTech (Pty) Limited

South Africa

31 Isando Road, Isando, Gauteng, 1600, South Africa

Ordinary, 
Ordinary A

EPIX Power Systems, LLC

United States The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington DE 

Units

19801, United States

ESCO – Bucyrus Blades Canada

Canada

1800 - 510 West Georgia Street, Vancouver BC V6B 0M3, Canada

ESCO – Bucyrus Blades Financing 
Ltd. Partnership (RH)

Canada

1800 - 510 West Georgia Street, Vancouver BC V6B 0M3, Canada

ESCO (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd.

China

ESCO (UK) Holdings Limited

ESCO (UK) Limited

England 
and Wales

England 
and Wales

 25GH, Lekai Building, No. 660, Shangcheng Road, Pudong New 
District, Shanghai, China

Ings Road, Doncaster, DN5 9SN, United Kingdom

Ings Road, Doncaster, DN5 9SN, United Kingdom

N/A

N/A

N/A

Ordinary

Ordinary

ESCO (Xuzhou) Wearparts Co., Ltd. China

 DaZhai Road andCuiZhuan Nan Road, Tongshan Economic 
Development Zone, Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, 221116, China

N/A

ESCO Australia Holdings 
Pty Limited

Australia

25 Trade Street, Lytton, Queensland QLD 4178, Australia

Ordinary

ESCO Belgium SA

Belgium

 Rue des Fours à Chaux, Zoning Industriel, Frameries, 7080, Belgium Ordinary

ESCO Canada Finance 
Company Inc.

Canada

1800 - 510 West Georgia Street, Vancouver BC V6B 0M3, Canada

Common

ESCO Canada Ltd.

Canada

1800 - 510 West Georgia Street, Vancouver BC V6B 0M3, Canada

Ordinary

ESCO Dunedin Pty Ltd

Australia

25 Trade Street, Lytton, Queensland QLD 4178, Australia

Ordinary

ESCO Elecmetal 
Fundición Limitada

ESCO Electric Steel Foundry 
Company of Africa (Pty) Ltd

Chile

Calle Miraflores, Numero 222, Piso Veinticuatro, Santiago, Chile

N/A

South Africa

22 Chester Road, Parkwood, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa

Ordinary

ESCO EMEA Holdings (UK) 
Limited

England 
and Wales

Ings Road, Doncaster, DN5 9SN, United Kingdom

Ordinary

ESCO Engineering Kingaroy 
Pty Ltd

Australia

25 Trade Street, Lytton, Queensland QLD 4178, Australia

Ordinary

Directly 
Held By 
PLC*

% of  
class

99.99

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

50

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

50

100

100

100

216

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Company Name

Country

Registered Office address

ESCO Engineering Pty Ltd

Australia

25 Trade Street, Lytton, Queensland QLD 4178, Australia

ESCO GmbH

ESCO GP Ltd.

Germany

Marie-Bernays Ring 1, Moenchengladbach, 41199, Germany

Canada

2500, 10175 - 101 Street, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0H3, Canada

ESCO Group Holdings Pty Ltd

Australia

25 Trade Street, Lytton, Queensland QLD 4178, Australia

ESCO Group LLC

United States 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington DE 19801, United States

ESCO Hydra (UK) Limited

England 
and Wales

Ings Road, Doncaster, DN5 9SN, United Kingdom

Australia

25 Trade Street, Lytton, Queensland QLD 4178, Australia

ESCO Indonesia Investco No 1 
Pty Ltd

ESCO Indonesia Investco No 2 
Pty Ltd

Class name 

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Membership  
Units

Ordinary, 
Ordinary A

Ordinary

Australia

25 Trade Street, Lytton, Queensland QLD 4178, Australia

Ordinary

ESCO International (H.K.) 
Holdings Limited

Hong Kong

Suites 5801, 5804-06, Central Plaza, 18 Harbour Road, Wanchai,  
Hong Kong

ESCO International Holdings SPRL Belgium

ESCO Japan, Inc.

Japan

122,Rue des Four à Chaux, Zoning Industriel, Frameries, 7080, 
Belgium

Marunouchi Mitsui Building, 2-2-2 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku,  
Tokyo, 100-0005, Japan

Ordinary

Ordinary

Common

ESCO LATIN AMÉRICA COMÉRCIO  
E INDÚSTRIA LTDA.

Brazil

 Rua Engenheiro Gerhard Ett, nº 1.215, Distrito Industrial Paulo Camilo 
Sul, CEP 32669-110, Brazil

Ordinary

ESCO Limited

Canada

1800 - 510 West Georgia Street, Vancouver BC V6B 0M3, Canada

Ordinary-A

ESCO Moçambique S.A.

Mozambique

 Avenida Kim Il Sung, no. 961, Maputo, Mozambique

ESCO Northgate Pty Limited

Australia

25 Trade Street, Lytton, Queensland QLD 4178, Australia

ESCO Peru S.R.L.

Peru

Av. Manuel Olguin 211, Suite 304, Surco, Lima, Peru

ESCO RUS Limited 
Liability Company

Russian  
Federation

69 Leningradskoe Shosse, Building 1, 125445, Moscow, 
Russian Federation

ESCO S.A.S.

France

57 Rue d’Amsterdam, 75008, Paris, France

ESCO Servicios Mineros S.A.

Argentina

Tucuman 1, Piso 4, C1049AAA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

ESCO South Africa Wearparts (Pty) 
Limited

South Africa

22 Chester Road, Parkwood, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa

Ordinary

Ordinary

Common

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary,  
Cumulative 
Reedemable  
Preference, 
Empowerment  
Shares

ESCO Supply and 
Service Kazakhstan

ESCO SUPPLY CARAJÁS 
INDUSTRIA DE PECAS E 
EQUIPAMENTOS LTDA

Kazakhstan

4th floor, 192/2 Dostyk avenue, Almaty city, 050051, Kazakhstan

Ordinary

Brazil

Rodovia PA-160, Loteamento Parque dos Carajas Il, Quadra 73,  
Lotes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 22, 23 e 24 , Parauapebas, Brazil

Ordinary

ESCO Supply Ltd.

Canada

 2500, 10175 - 101 Street, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0H3, Canada

Ordinary-A

ESCO Turbine Components Europe, 
sprl

Belgium

122, Rue des Fours à Chaux, Zoning Industriel, Frameries, 7080, 
Belgium

Ordinary

ESCO Wearparts Supply and 
Services (Namibia) (Proprietary) 
Limited

Namibia

Private Bag 12012, Ausspannplatz, Windhoek, Namibia

Ordinary

ESCO Windber Inc.

United States 2141 NW 25th Avenue, Portland OR 97210, United States

Ordinary

Fabrica de Aisladores Sismicos de 
Chile Limitada

Chile

San José N° 815, San Bernardo, Santiago de Chile, Chile

Fundición Vulco Ltda

Chile

San José N° 815, San Bernardo, Santiago de Chile, Chile

N/A

N/A

G. & J. Weir, Limited

England 
and Wales

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire,  
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

Ordinary

217

Directly 
Held By 
PLC*

% of  
class

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

S
h
a
r
e
h
o
d
e
r

l

I

n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Shareholder Information

SUBSIDIARY UNDERTAKINGS
CONTINUED

Company Name

Country

Registered Office address

Class name 

Hurricane Investments Inc.

United States The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington DE 

Common

19801, United States

Inversiones ESCO Chile Limitada

Chile

Calle Miraflores, Numero 222, Piso Veinticuatro, Santiago, Chile

Inversiones Linatex Chile (Holdings) 
Limitada

Chile

San José N° 815, San Bernardo, Santiago de Chile, Chile

JF (Jiangsu) Machinery Co. Ltd

China

East 188, Hutai Road, Liuhe Town, Taicang City, China

N/A

N/A

N/A

Linatex (H.K.) Limited

Hong Kong

Level 54, Hopewell Centre, 183 Queen's Road East, Hong Kong

Ordinary

Linatex Africa (Pty) Limited

South Africa

5 Clarke Street, Alrode, Alberton, Gauteng, 1449, South Africa

Linatex Asset Holdings Malaysia 
Sdn. Bhd.

Malaysia

2nd Floor, No 2-4 Jalan Manau, 50460 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah 
Persekutuan, Malaysia

Linatex Australia Pty Limited

Australia

1-5 Marden Street, Artarmon NSW 2064, Australia

Ordinary

Ordinary

Class A Shares, 
Class B Shares

Linatex Chile Limitada

Linatex Chile SpA

Chile

Chile

San José N° 815, San Bernardo, Santiago de Chile, Chile

N/A

Santa Catalina de Chena 850, San Bernardo, Santiago de Chile, Chile Ordinary 

Nominative Share

Linatex Consolidated Holdings Ltd Virgin Islands, 

Linatex Limited

Linatex Rubber Limited

British

England 
and Wales

England 
and Wales

Linatex Rubber Products Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia

Kingston Chambers, PO Box 173, Road Town, Tortola, 
British, Virgin Islands 

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

2nd Floor, No 2-4 Jalan Manau, 50460 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah 
Persekutuan, Malaysia

Linatex UK Holding Limited

England 
and Wales

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden Lancashire 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

Metalúrgica Vulco Ltda

Chile

San José N° 815, San Bernardo, Santiago de Chile, Chile

Multiflo Pumps Pty Limited

Australia

1-5 Marden Street, Artarmon NSW 2064, Australia

Overseas ESCO Corporation Ltd.

Virgin Islands, 
British

 The Lake Building, 1st Floor, Wickams Cay 1, P. O. Box 3152, 
Road Town, Tortola, British, Virgin Islands

PT ESCO Mining Products

Indonesia

 The Garden Centre #3-04, Cilandak Commercial Estate, JL Raya 
Cilandak KKO, Jakarta, 12075, Indonesia

PT Weir Minerals Contract 
Services Indonesia

Indonesia

Jl. Mulawarman Rt. 20 No. 20 Kelurahan Manggar, Kec, Balikpapan 
Timur, Kota Balikpapan, 76116, Indonesia

PT Weir Minerals Indonesia

Indonesia

PT Weir Oil & Gas Indonesia

Indonesia

Jl. Mulawarman Rt. 20 No. 20 Kelurahan Manggar, Kec, Balikpapan 
Timur, Kota Balikpapan, 76116, Indonesia

Jl. Mulawarman Rt. 20 No. 20 Kelurahan Manggar, Kec, Balikpapan 
Timur, Kota Balikpapan, 76116, Indonesia

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

N/A

Ordinary

N/A

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

PT Weir Pressure Control Indonesia Indonesia

Suite 701B, 7th Floor, Setiabudi Atrium, JI. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav 62, 
Jakarta 12920, Indonesia

Ordinary A, B

S.P.M. Flow Control, Inc.

United States CT Corporation System, 1999 Bryan St., Suite 900, Dallas, TX, 75201

Common

Seaboard Canada Ltd.

Canada

5233 49 Ave, Red Deer AB T4N 6G5, Canada

Common

Seaboard Holdings, Inc.

United States The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington DE 

Common

19801, United States

Seaboard International Holding 
Company (Hong Kong) Limited

Hong Kong

Level 54, Hopewell Centre, 183 Queen's Road East, Hong Kong

Ordinary

Seaboard International Inc.

United States CT Corporation System, 1999 Bryan St., Suite 900, Dallas, TX, 75201

Common

Seaboard Real Estate, LLC

United States The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington 

Units

DE 19801

Shanghai JF Engineering  
Equipment Co. Ltd

China

No.572, Yonghe Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, China

N/A

Directly 
Held By 
PLC*

% of  
class

100

99.99

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

95

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

218

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Company Name

Country

Registered Office address

Class name 

Shanghai Vortex Engineering 
Machinery Co. Ltd

Shanxi Changfeng Wearparts Co. 
Ltd.

China

Building #3, No.4918, Liuxiang Road, Jiading District, Shanghai, China N/A

China

No. 53, Yuhe Street, Wanbailin District, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030024, China N/A

Slurry Holdings Limited

Malta

93 Mill Street, Qormi, QRM3102, Malta

Soldering Comércio e indústria ltda. Brazil

Rua Engenheiro Gerhard Ett, nº 1.215, Distrito Industrial Paulo Camilo 
Sul, CEP 32669-110, Brazil

Ordinary

Ordinary

Specialised Petroleum 
Manufacturing Limited

Scotland

SPM House, Badentoy Crescent, Badentoy Industrial Park, Portlethen, 
Aberdeen, AB12 4YD, United Kingdom

Ordinary

SPM Flow Control de Mexico, S. 
de R.L. de C.V.

Mexico

Bosque De Ciruelos, 180 Bosques De Las Lomas, Bosque Hayas Y 
Bosque De La Reforma Miguel Hidalgo, Dirstrito Federal, CP 11700, 
Mexico

Serie A

SPM Flow Control Ltd.

Canada

5233 49 Ave, Red Deer AB T4N 6G5, Canada

SPM UK Limited

Cayman  
Islands

PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104,  
Cayman Islands

Class A Common

Ordinary

Thandilwa Training Centre (Pty) Ltd South Africa

22 Chester Road, Parkwood, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa

Ordinary

The Weir Group Insurance 
Company Limited

Isle of Man

1st Floor, Rose House, 51-59 Circular Road, Douglas, Isle of Man

Ordinary

The Weir Group International S.A.

Switzerland

Rue de Romont 35, c/o Daniel Schneuwly, 1700 FRIBOURG, Fribourg, 
Switzerland

Ordinary

The Weir Group Pension 
Trust Limited

Trio Engineered Products  
(Hong Kong) Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom N/A

Hong Kong

Level 54, Hopewell Centre, 183 Queen's Road East, Hong Kong

Ordinary

Trio Engineered Products, Inc.

United States CT Corporation System, 818 West Seventh Street, Suite 930, Los 

Common

Angeles CA 90017, United States

TWG Canada Holdings Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

TWG Cayman Limited

Cayman  
Islands

M & C Corporate Services Limited, PO Box 309, Ugland House, South 
George Street, George Town, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands

Ordinary

TWG Drilling Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

TWG Engineering (No.1) Limited

TWG Engineering (No.2) Limited

TWG Engineering (No.3) Limited

TWG Engineering (No.4) Limited

TWG Engineering (No.5) Limited

TWG Engineering (No.7) Limited

England 
and Wales

England 
and Wales

England 
and Wales

England 
and Wales

England 
and Wales

England 
and Wales

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

TWG Finance, Inc.

United States The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington 

Common

DE 19801

TWG Investments (No. 6) Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

TWG Investments (No. 7) Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

TWG Investments (No. 8) Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

TWG Investments (No.10) Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

TWG Investments (No.11) Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

TWG Investments (No.3) Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary, 

Preference

Directly 
Held By 
PLC*

% of  
class

100

54.43

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

S
h
a
r
e
h
o
d
e
r

l

I

n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

*

*

*

*

*

219

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Shareholder Information

SUBSIDIARY UNDERTAKINGS
CONTINUED

Company Name

Country

Registered Office address

Class name 

TWG Investments (No.4) Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary, 

Directly 
Held By 
PLC*

% of  
class

100

TWG Overseas Finance S.à.r.l

Luxembourg

20 Rue des Peupliers, L-2328, Luxembourg

Preference

Ordinary, 
Preference

TWG South America 
Holdings Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary, 

Preference

TWG UK Holdings Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

TWG US Finance LLC

United States The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington 

DE 19801

Membership  
Units

TWG US Holdings LLC

United States The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington 

Units

DE 19801

TWG Young Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

Vulco Peru SA

Vulco S.A.

Peru

Chile

Av. Separadora Industrial, N° 2201 Urb Vulcano Ate, Lima, Peru

Ordinary

San José N° 815, San Bernardo, Santiago de Chile, Chile

Ordinary 
Nominative Share

99.17063

Warman Pumps Ltd

Australia

1-3 Marden Street, Artarmon NSW 2064, Australia

Waterloo West Limited

England 
and Wales

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

Ordinary

Ordinary

Weir ABF LP

Scotland

1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom

N/A

Weir Arabian Metals Company

Saudi Arabia Makkah Street, Dammam 2nd, Industrial City, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia Common

Weir B.V.

Netherlands

PO Box 249, 5900 AE, Venlo, Netherlands, Netherlands

Weir Brasil Comercio Ltda

Brazil

Rua Dona Francisca 8.300, Perini Business Park, Bloco C6, Joinville, 
Santa Catarina, CEP 89.219-600, Brazil

Weir Canada, Inc.

Canada

2360 Millrace Court, Mississauga ON L5N 1W2, Canada

Weir Canadian Investments, Inc.

Canada

2360 Millrace Court, Mississauga ON L5N 1W2, Canada

Ordinary

Ordinary

Common

Common

Weir do Brasil Ltda

Brazil

Av Jose Benassi, 2151 - Condomini, FAZGRAN, CEP 13213-085 -, Brazil Nominal

Weir Drilling Services Limited

England 
and Wales

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

Ordinary A, B, C

Weir Engineering Products 
(Shanghai) Co., Ltd

China

Room 318, Floor 3, No. 458, Fute North Road, Shanghai, China

N/A

Weir Engineering Services Limited Scotland

1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom

Australia

1-5 Marden Street, Artarmon NSW 2064, Australia

Ordinary

Ordinary

Weir Group (Australian Holdings) 
Pty Limited

Weir Group (Overseas Holdings) 
Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

Weir Group African IP Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary £,$

Weir Group Engineering  
Hong Kong Limited

Weir Group Executive SUURB 
Trustee Limited

Hong Kong

Level 54, Hopewell Centre, 183 Queen's Road East, Hong Kong

Ordinary

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

Weir Group General Partner Limited Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

Weir Group Holdings Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

Weir Group Inc.

United States The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington 

DE 19801

Common, 
Preferred

Weir Group Investments Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

Weir Group IP Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

Weir Group Machinery Equipment 
(Shanghai) Co. Ltd.

Weir Group Management 
Services Limited

China

No.4918, Liuxiang Road, Xuxing Town, Jiading District, Shanghai, China N/A

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

220

100

100

100

100

100

100

99.99

100

100

100

49

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Company Name

Country

Registered Office address

Class name 

Weir Group Trading  
(Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

China

Room 02,03, Longlife Level 14 No. 1566, West Yan'an Road, Shanghai, 
China

N/A

Weir Group Trading Mexico, S.A. 
de C.V.

Mexico

Av. Nafta No. 775, Col. Parque Industrial, Stiva Aeropuerto, Mexico

Ordinary 
Nominative Share

Weir HBF (Pty) Ltd

South Africa

50 Strudebaker Street, Markman Industria, Port Elizabeth, South Africa Ordinary

Weir Holdings B.V.

Netherlands

PO Box 249, 5900 AE, Venlo, Netherlands, Netherlands

Ordinary

Weir Investments Two Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary A, B

Weir Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.

Malaysia

2nd Floor, No 2-4 Jalan Manau, 50460 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah 
Persekutuan, Malaysia

Weir Minerals (India)  
Private Limited

Weir Minerals Africa  
(Proprietary) Limited

India

Office Unit No 912 and 914, 9th Floor, DLF Tower- A, Plot No 10, 
Jasola District Centre, New Delhi, 110025, India

South Africa

5 Clarke Street South, Alrode, Alberton, South Africa, 1149,  
South Africa

Weir Minerals Armenia LLC

Armenia

Index 0069, 16/35 Kamarak Str, Yerevan, Armenia

Weir Minerals Australia Limited

Australia

1-3 Marden Street, Artarmon NSW 2064, Australia

Ordinary, 
Preference

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Weir Minerals Botswana 
(Proprietary) Limited

Weir Minerals Caribe SRL

Botswana

Plot 5039/5040, Somerset East Industrial, Francistown, Botswana

Ordinary

Dominican  
Republic

Kk 22,5 Autopista Duarte, Parque Industrial Duarte, Parque De Naves 
Pid 4, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic

Ordinary

Weir Minerals Central Africa Limited Zambia

Plot 3655, Chimbuluma Road, Kitwe, Zambia

Weir Minerals China Co., Limited

China

Weir Minerals Colombia SAS

Colombia

Factory #27, 158 Hua Shan Road, Suzhou New District, Suzhou,  
215011, China

Carrera 43 B # 16 41 Office 904, Building Staff, Medellin Antioquia, 
Colombia

Weir Minerals Czech & Slovak, s.r.o. Czech Republic Hlinky 118, 603 00 Brno, Czech Rep., Brno, Czech Republic

Weir Minerals East Africa Limited

Tanzania

Plot No. 137, Capri Point, Mwanza, Tanzania

Ordinary

N/A

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Weir Minerals Europe Limited

Weir Minerals Finland Oy

Weir Minerals France SAS

England 
and Wales

Finland

France

Askonkatu 9F, Lahti, FIN-15100, Finland

10 Rue Jacquard, Chassieu, 69680, France

Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

Ordinary

Weir Minerals Germany GmbH

Germany

Lise-Meitner-Straße 12, 74074, Heilbronn, Germany

Ordinary

Ordinary

Capital

Weir Minerals Hungary Kft

Hungary

Teleki László utca 11 1/.3 Tatabánya, 2800-HU, Hungary

Issued Capital

Weir Minerals Isando (Pty) Ltd

South Africa

5 Clarke Street, Alrode, Alberton, Gauteng, 1449, South Africa

Weir Minerals Italy S.r.l.

Italy

Via F.lli Cervi 1/D, Cernusco sul Naviglio, 20063, Milan, Italy

Ordinary

Ordinary

Weir Minerals Kazakhstan LLP

Kazakhstan

4th Floor, 192/2 Dostyk Avenue, Almaty, 050051, Kazakhstan

Charter capital

Weir Minerals Kenya Limited

Kenya

Weir Minerals Madagascar Sarlu

Madagascar

LR No. 1870/1/569, Ring Road Parklands, P.O. Box 764 - 00606 - 
Sarit Centre, Nairobi, Kenya

Immcuble Mining Business Center sis a Mamory Ivato, 10518 Ivato 
Aeroport, Analamanga, Madagascar

Ordinary

Ordinary

Weir Minerals Mexico Servicios,  
S.A. de C.V.

Mexico

Av. Nafta No. 775, Col. Parque Industrial, Stiva Aeropuerto, Mexico

Weir Minerals México, SA de CV

Mexico

Av. Nafta No. 775, Col. Parque Industrial, Stiva Aeropuerto, Mexico

Ordinary 
Nominative Share

Ordinary 
Nominative Share

Weir Minerals Mongolia LLC

Mongolia

205, 2nd Khoroo, Bayangol District, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

Ordinary

Weir Minerals Mozambique Ltd

Mozambique Mozambique, Maputo Cidade, Distrito urbano1, Bairro, Centrall, 

Ordinary

AV. Zedequias, Manganhela, Mozambique

Weir Minerals Netherlands B.V.

Netherlands

PO Box 249, 5900 AE, Venlo, Netherlands, Netherlands

Weir Minerals North Africa SARL

Morocco

Boulevard Sidi Mohamed, Ben Abdellah, Im B, 1Er Etage N 29., 
Casablanca, 20160, Morocco

Ordinary

Ordinary

221

Directly 
Held By 
PLC*

*

% of  
class

100

100

100

100

100

100

97.25

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

S
h
a
r
e
h
o
d
e
r

l

I

n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Shareholder Information

SUBSIDIARY UNDERTAKINGS
CONTINUED

Company Name

Country

Registered Office address

Weir Minerals Panama S.A.

Panama

Ciudad de Panama, Panama

Class name 

Ordinary

Weir Minerals Poland Sp. z.o.o.

Poland

Ul. Ignacego Domeyki 2, 30-066, Krakow, Poland

Company Capital

Weir Minerals Processing 
Equipment & Services LLC 

United Arab  
Emirates

EFCO Cement Products Factory, Plot No 597901, Dubai Investment 
Park II, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Ordinary

Weir Minerals Pump & Mining 
Solutions Namibia (Proprietary) 
Limited

Weir Minerals RFW LLC (OOO)

Namibia

54 Hidipo Hamutenya Avenue, Swakopmund, Namibia

Ordinary

Russian  
Federation

Entrance 2, Floor 3, Business Center TRIO, Building 1, House 12, 
8 Marta Street, 127083, Moscow, Russian Federation

N/A

Weir Minerals Shared Services 
Proprietary Limited

South Africa

5 Clarke Street South, Alrode, Alberton, South Africa, 1149,  
South Africa

Ordinary

Weir Minerals South Africa 
Proprietary Limited

South Africa

5 Clarke Street, Alrode, Alberton, Gauteng, 1449, South Africa

Ordinary

Weir Minerals Sweden AB

Sweden

Metallvägen 6, 982 38 Gällivare, Sweden

A, B Class Shares

Weir Minerals Taiwan Corp. Ltd

Taiwan

4F, No 433, Ruiguang Road, Neihu Dist, TAIPEI, Taiwan

Ordinary

Weir Minerals Ukraine LLC

Ukraine

Blagoyeva 31 Str, Dnipro, Dnepropetrovsk Reg, 49054, Ukraine

Share Capital

Weir Minerals West Africa Limited Ghana

No.4, 3rd Close, Airport Residential Area, Accra Post Box CT3170,  
Accra, Ghana

Weir Oil & Gas Australia Pty Limited Australia

1-5 Marden Street, Artarmon NSW 2064, Australia

Weir Oil & Gas Malaysia Sdn Bhd Malaysia

Level 16, Integra Tower, The Intermark 348 Jalan Tun Razak, Kuala 
Lumpur, Malaysia

Weir Oil & Gas Singapore (Services) 
Pte Ltd

Singapore

77 Science Park Drive, #04-01/08, Cintech III Building, 118256, 
Singapore

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Weir Oil & Gas Technical Service 
(Tianjin) Limited

China

Room 312, Rongke Building, No. 8, Zhaofa Xincun, Tianjin Economic-
Technological Development Area, China

N/A

Weir Oil and Gas Colombia S.A.S.

Colombia

Cra 25 A N° 11- 64, Bogota D.c., 111411221 (No Lo Exigen Colocar En 
Camara De Comercio), Colombia

Ordinary

Weir Pump and Valve Solutions, Inc United States The Corporation Company, 40600 Ann Arbour Road, Este, 201, 

Common

Plymouth Mi 48170 4675, United States

Weir Pumps Limited

Scotland

10th Floor, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, United Kingdom Ordinary

Weir Services Australia Pty Ltd

Australia

1-5 Marden Street, Artarmon NSW 2064, Australia

Weir Services Tanzania (Pty) Limited.Tanzania

Plot No.137, Capri Point, Mwanza, Tanzania

Ordinary

Ordinary

Weir Slurry Group, Inc.

United States CT Corporation System, 301 South Bedford Street, Suite 1, Madison, 

Common

53703

Weir Solutions Caspian LLC

Azerbaijan

29 Zarifa Aliyeva Street, Apt 77/77A, Sabayil District, Baku, AZ1095, 
Azerbaijan

Weir Solutions FZE

United Arab  
Emirates

Office no. W 312, West Side 1, Dubai Airport Free Zone, Dubai,  
United Arab Emirates

Weir Solutions LLC

Oman

PO Box 168, Postal Code 102, Muscat, Oman

Weir SOS Limited

Bahamas

Ocean Centre, Montagu Foreshore, East Bay Street, Nassau,  
New Providence, Bahamas

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Weir SPM do Brasil Comércio, 
Locação e Instalação de Bombas 
e Equipamentos Geradores de 
Pressão Ltda.

Brazil

Rua Internacional s/n, Granja dos Cavaleiros, CEP 27933-420, Brazil

Nominal

Weir SPM Singapore Pte. Ltd.

Singapore

77 Science Park Drive, #04-01/06, Cintech III Building, 118256, 
Singapore

Ordinary

Weir Sudamerica S.A.

Chile

San José N° 815, San Bernardo, Santiago de Chile, Chile

Ordinary 
Nominative Share

Weir Turkey Mineralleri 
Limited Sirketi

Turkey

Istanbul Tuzla Organize Sanayi Bölgesi, 2 Cadde No. 12, Tepeören Tuzla, 
Istanbul, 34959, Turkey

Bearer

Directly 
Held By 
PLC*

% of  
class

100

100

49

100

100

100

100

100

90

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

99.99

100

222

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Company Name

Country

Registered Office address

Class name 

Weir US Holdings Inc.

United States The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington 

Common

DE 19801

Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc.

United States CT Corporation System, 155 Federal Street, Suite 700, Boston 

MA 02110

Weir Vulco Argentina S.A.

Argentina

Sarmiento 511 Sur 1°Piso A, San Juan, CP 5400, Argentina

Common, 
Preferred

Ordinary

Weir Warman (U.K.) Limited

England 
and Wales

Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

Ordinary

Wesco LLC

United 
Arab Emirates

Bin Hamoodah Towers, Floor 13, Khalifa Street, Abu Dhabi, United 
Arab Emirates

Ordinary

WHW Group Inc.

United States The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington 

Common

DE 19801

Wokingham Finance 
Company Limited

England 
and Wales

C/o Weir Minerals Europe, Halifax Road, Todmorden, Lancashire, 
OL14 5RT, United Kingdom

Ordinary

Wuxi Weir Minerals Equipments 
Co., Ltd.

China

Lot 265, Wuxi-Singapore Industrial Park, Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, 
China

N/A

Directly 
Held By 
PLC*

% of  
class

100

100

100

100

49

100

100

100

*

*

S
h
a
r
e
h
o
d
e
r

l

I

n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

223

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

The website includes information about the 
markets in which we operate, our strategy 
and business performance, recent news 
from the Group and product information. 
The investor section is a key source of 
information for Shareholders, containing 
details on the share price, our financial 
results, Shareholder meetings and dividends, 
as well as a ‘Shareholders FAQ’ section.

E-Communications
We are encouraging our shareholders to 
receive their information by email and via our 
website. Not only is this quick, it helps to 
reduce paper, printing and costs.

To register for e-communications, log on to 
www.investorcentre.co.uk/ecomms

Follow us

ANNUAL AND INTERIM REPORTS
Our Annual Report is available online. You can 
view or download the full Annual Report 
and Interim Report from our website at 
www.global.weir/investors/ reporting-centre. 
Current and past Annual and Interim Reports 
are also available to view and download.

Managing your shareholding online with 
Investor Centre Investor Centre is a free, 
secure online service run by Computershare, 
giving you convenient access to information 
on your shareholdings. Manage your 
shareholding online and take advantage of all 
these features and more:

•  View share balances and market 

values for all of your Computershare- 
managed holdings

•  Update dividend mandate bank instructions 

including global payments and view 
dividend payment history
•  Register to receive company 

communications online

•  Cast your Proxy Vote online for forthcoming 

General Meetings

•  Update personal details, such as 

your address

Registration is quick and easy. 
Just visit www.investorcentre.co.uk with 
your Shareholder Reference Number (SRN) 
to hand.

After registering, you may be sent an 
activation code in the post, used to validate 
your account. Once activated, you will have 
full access to Investor Centre services.

COMPANY SECRETARY & 
REGISTERED OFFICE 
Graham Vanhegan  
The Weir Group PLC 
1 West Regent Street  
Glasgow 
G2 1RW

Registered in Scotland. Company  
No. SC002934.

REGISTRAR
Computershare Investor Services PLC  
The Pavilions  
Bridgwater Road  
Bristol  
BS99 6ZZ

Website: www.investorcentre.co.uk 

Telephone: 0370 707 1402 

Shareholder enquiries relating to 
shareholding, dividend payments, change 
of name or address, lost share certificates 
or dividend cheques, transfer of shares etc. 
should be addressed to Computershare.

SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS 
Online Communications 
Shareholders are encouraged to visit 
the Company’s corporate website 
(www.global.weir), which contains a wealth 
of information about the Weir Group. 

ORDINARY SHAREHOLDER  
ANALYSIS AT 31 DECEMBER 2019
By country

By holding size

Range
1 – 1,000
1,001 – 5,000
5,001 – 10,000
10,001 – 100,000
100,001 – 500,000
500,001 – 1,000,000
1,000,001 – 999,999,999

UK shareholders
Overseas shareholders

92.97% Total

7.03%

By shareholder category

Individuals
Bank or Nominees
Investment Trust
Insurance Company
Other Company
Pension Trust
Other Corporate Body
Total

224

No. of 
Shareholders
 2,756 
 1,223 
 223 
 378 
 166 
 39 
 48 

%
0.42
1.03
0.61
4.88
15.14
10.43
67.49
 4,833  100.00  259,613,517  100.00

% No. of Shares
 1,089,884 
57.02
 2,670,108 
25.31
 1,577,635 
4.61
 12,670,996 
7.82
 39,309,782 
3.43
0.81
 27,089,097 
0.99  175,206,015 

 3,162 
 1,593 
 13 
 1 
 47 
 1 
 16 

1.82
97.09
0.01
0.02
0.20
0.00
0.87
 4,833  100.00  259,613,517  100.00

65.43
 4,724,139 
32.96  252,054,247 
 27,343 
 41,711 
 506,492 
 1 
 2,259,584 

0.27
0.02
0.97
0.02
0.33

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 2020
Our Annual General Meeting will be held 
at our Head Office, 1 West Regent Street, 
Glasgow, at 2.30pm on Tuesday 28 April 2020. 
Further details are contained in the Notice 
of Annual General Meeting 2020 which is 
available to download from our website at 
www.global.weir/shareholder-information/agm

VOTING
Information on how you can vote 
electronically on the resolutions which will 
be put forward at our 2020 AGM can be 
obtained through our Registrar by visiting 
www.investorcentre.co.uk/eproxy. You will 
need details of the Control Number, your SRN 
and PIN which can be found on the Form of 
Proxy or email, if you have asked to be sent 
email communications.

DIVIDENDS
2020 final dividend
The Directors have recommended a final 
dividend of 30.45 pence per share, for the 
year ended 31 December 2019. Payment of 
this dividend is subject to approval at the 2020 
Annual General Meeting. Key dates relating to 
this dividend are given below.

Annual General Meeting
Ex-dividend date 
Record date
Mandatory Direct Credit deadline
Payment date

DIVIDEND HISTORY – (PENCE PER SHARE)

28 April 2020
23 April 2020
24 April 2020
18 May 2020
5 June 2020

Interim
Final
Total

2014
15.0
29.0
44.0

2015
15.0
29.0
44.0

2016
15.0
29.0
44.0

2017
15.0
29.0
44.0

2018
15.75
30.45
46.20

2019
16.50
30.45
46.95

IMPORTANT – PAYMENT 
OF DIVIDENDS BY MANDATORY 
DIRECT CREDIT
From 2019, the Company simplified the way 
in which pay our dividends to shareholders 
and now pays cash dividends by direct credit 
only. If our Registrar Computershare does 
not have any bank/building society details on 
record for you and you do not register these 
with Computershare by 18 May 2020, the 
forthcoming dividend and future payments 
will remain unissued and you may then be 
charged to have your payments issued at a 
later date. 

Paying dividends into a bank or building 
society account is a quicker and more secure 
way for your dividends to be paid directly 
to you. In order to receive your dividends 
directly into your bank account, you will need 
to register your bank/building society details 
on our Registrars’ website at investorcentre.
co.uk. You will need your ten digit Shareholder 
Reference Number (SRN) which starts with 
the letter C or G to log in.

This can be found on your share certificate(s) 
and dividend confirmation. Alternatively, you 
can call Computershare on the dedicated 
Shareholder helpline 0370 707 1402, should 
you have any questions about registering your 
payment instruction.

An Annual Dividend Confirmation detailing 
all payments made throughout the tax 
year will be sent to you once a year either 
electronically or to your registered address. 
In 2020, the Dividend Confirmation will 
be dispatched with the November 2020 
dividend payment and contains the payment 
information for dividends paid during the 
2020/2021 tax year.

Global Payment Service
If you live overseas, Computershare offers a 
Global Payment Service which is available in 
certain countries. This may make it possible 
to receive dividends direct into your bank 
account in your local currency. Please note 
that the fees applied for this service will be 
automatically deducted from the proceeds 
before it is paid to you. For further details go 
to www.investorcentre.co.uk then select the 
information tab followed by FAQs then select 
the Dividends and Payments tab and the 
Global Payment Service tab.

AMERICAN DEPOSITARY RECEIPT 
(ADR) PROGRAMME
The Company has a sponsored level 1 ADR 
programme in the United States. Each ADR 
represents two ordinary shares of 12.5 pence 
each, in the Company. The Company’s ADR 
programme is administered by Citibank, who 
were appointed in February 2016.

S
h
a
r
e
h
o
d
e
r

l

I

n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

ADR INVESTOR CONTACT
Telephone: +1 781 575 4555 Citibank 
representatives are available from 
8.30am to 6.00pm US Eastern 
Standard Time (EST) Monday to Friday. 
Email: citibank@shareholders-online.com

In writing
Citibank Shareholder Services 
P.O. Box 43077 
Providence, 
Rhode Island 029403077

ADR broker contact
Telephone:  +1 212 723 5435 /  
+44 207 500 2030

E-mail: citiadr@citi.com

DIVIDEND TAX ALLOWANCE
With effect from April 2018, the annual tax 
free allowance on dividend income was 
reduced from £5,000 to £2,000.

Above this amount, individuals will pay tax 
on their dividend income at a rate dependent 
on their income tax bracket and personal 
circumstances. We will continue to provide 
registered shareholders with confirmation 
of the dividends paid and this should be 
included with any other dividend income 
received when calculating and reporting total 
dividend income received. It is a shareholder’s 
responsibility to include all dividend income 
when calculating any tax liability.

This provision is enshrined in the Finance 
Act 2016. If you have any tax queries, please 
contact a financial adviser. 

225

 
The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
CONTINUED

Telephone share dealing – commission is 
1% of the value of each sale or purchase of 
shares, plus £35. In addition, stamp duty, 
currently 0.5%, is payable on purchases. 
You can contact Computershare on 0370 
703 0084. Shareholders should have their 
SRN ready when making the call. The SRN 
appears on share certificates and dividend 
documentation. Detailed terms and conditions 
are available at www.investorcentre.co.uk or 
by contacting Computershare. Please note 
this service is, at present, only available to 
shareholders resident in certain jurisdictions. 
Please refer to the Computershare website 
for an up-to-date list of these countries.

These services are offered on an execution 
only basis and subject to the applicable terms 
and conditions. Computershare Investor 
Services PLC is authorised and regulated by 
the Financial Conduct Authority.

This is not a recommendation to buy, sell 
or hold shares in The Weir Group PLC. 
Shareholders who are unsure of what action 
to take should obtain independent financial 
advice. Share values may go down as well as 
up which may result in a shareholder receiving 
less than he/she originally invested.

SHAREHOLDER WARNING ALERT 
Unsolicited investment advice and fraud
Many companies have become aware that 
their shareholders have received unsolicited 
phone calls or correspondence concerning 
investment matters. Share scams are often 
run from ‘boiler rooms’ where fraudsters 
cold-call investors offering them worthless, 
overpriced or even non-existent shares.

These callers can be very persistent and 
extremely persuasive and their activities have 
resulted in considerable losses for some 
investors. Whilst usually by telephone, the 
high-pressure sales tactics can also come by 
email, post, word of mouth or at a seminar. 
Shareholders are advised to be very wary of 
any unsolicited advice, offers to buy shares at 
a discount, sell your shares at a premium or 
offers of free company reports.

If you receive any unsolicited investment advice:

•  Make sure you get the correct name of the 
person and organisation and take a note of 
any other details they provide, such as a 
telephone number or address.

•  Check that the caller is properly authorised 
by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) by 
visiting www.fca.org.uk.

•  Report any approach from such 

organisations to the FCA using the share 
fraud reporting form at www.fca.org.uk/
consumers/report- scam-unauthorised-
firm, where you can also find out about the 
latest investment scams. You can also call 
the Consumer Helpline on 0800 111 6768.

•  If calls persist, hang up.

UNITED KINGDOM CAPITAL 
GAINS TAX 
For the purpose of capital gains tax, the 
market value of an ordinary share of The Weir 
Group PLC as at 31 March 1982 was 29.75p. 
This market value has been adjusted to take 
account of the sub-division of the share 
capital whereby each ordinary share of 25p 
was sub-divided into two ordinary shares of 
12.5p each on 28 June 1993. Rights issues 
of ordinary shares took place in April 1987 
at 157p per share on the basis of one new 
ordinary share for every seven ordinary shares 
held, in July 1990 at 250p per share on the 
basis of one new ordinary share for every 
five ordinary shares held and in September 
1994 at 252p per share on the basis of one 
new ordinary share for every four ordinary 
shares held.

SHARE DEALING SERVICES 
Shareholders have the opportunity to buy or 
sell The Weir Group PLC shares using a share 
dealing facility operated by our Registrar, 
Computershare. You will need to register for 
this service prior to using it. To access this 
service, go to www.computershare.trade.

Internet share dealing – commission is 
1% of the value of each sale or purchase 
of shares, subject to a minimum charge 
of £30. In addition, stamp duty, currently 
0.5%, is payable on purchases. There is no 
need to open a trading account in order to 
deal. Real time dealing is available during 
market hours (0800 to 1630 Monday to Friday 
excluding bank holidays). In addition, there 
is a convenient facility to place your order 
outside of market hours. Up to 90-day limit 
orders are available for sales. To access the 
service, go to www.computershare.trade. 
Shareholders should have their SRN available. 
The SRN appears on share certificates and 
dividend documentation.

Please note that, at present, this service 
is only available to shareholders in 
certain jurisdictions. Please refer to the 
Computershare website for an up-to-date list 
of these countries.

226

The Weir Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019

GLOSSARY

Additive manufacturing
The process of joining materials to make 
objects from 3D model data (3D printing)

AGM 
Annual General Meeting

GAAP
Generally Accepted Accounting Practice

SME 
Small and medium-sized enterprises

greenfield 
A term used to describe new 
mine developments

subsidiary 
An entity that is controlled, either directly or 
indirectly, by the Company

Board 
The Board of Directors of The Weir Group PLC

Group 
The Company together with its subsidiaries

tCO2e 
Tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent

bps 
Basis points

HR 
Human resources

Brownfield
A term used to describe current and 
expanding mine sites

capex
Capital expenditure

CGU 
Cash generating unit

Comminution 
Crushing, screening and grinding of materials 
in mining and sand and aggregates markets

Company 
The Weir Group PLC

DBP 
Deferred Bonus Plan

Director
A Director of The Weir Group PLC

EBIT 
Earnings before interest and tax

EBITDA
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation 
and amortisation 

emerging markets
Asia-Pacific, South America, Africa and the 
Middle East

EPCMs
Engineering, Procurement and Construction 
Management companies

EPS 
Earnings per share

Estera EBT
Employee benefit trust (Estera Trust (Jersey)
Limited)

Excellence Committees
Weir Group Management Committees 
ensuring best practice

External Auditors
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

free cash flow 
Cash flow from operating activities adjusted 
for income taxes, net capital expenditures, 
lease payments, net interest payments, 
dividends paid, settlement of derivatives, 
purchase of shares for employee share plans 
and pension contributions

IAS 
International Accounting Standards

IFRS
 International Financial Reporting Standards

Input 
Orders received from customers

Internet of Things (IoT)
The network of physical objects (devices, 
vehicles, buildings and other items) that 
are embedded with electronics, software, 
sensors and network connectivity, which 
enables these objects to collect and 
exchange data

ISO
International Organisation for Standardisation

KPI 
Key performance indicator

Kleinwort EBT
Employee benefit trust (SG Kleinwort 
Hambros Trust Company (CI) Ltd)

Like-for-like
On a consistent basis, excluding the impact 
of acquisitions

LTIP
Long Term Incentive Plan

NPBTA
Normalised profit before tax and amortisation 

operating margin
Operating profit including our share of results 
of joint ventures divided by revenue

ordinary shares 
The ordinary shares in the capital of the 
Company of 12.5p each

PILON
Payment in lieu of notice

Registrar 
Computershare Investor Services plc

R&D 
Research and development

RPI 
UK Retail Prices Index

SHE 
Safety, Health and Environment

227

TIR 
Total Incident Rate (rate of any Incident that 
causes an employee, visitor, contractor or 
anyone working on behalf of Weir to require 
off site medical treatment per 200,000 
hours worked)

TSR
Total Shareholder Return comprising 
dividends paid on ordinary shares and the 
increase or decrease in the market price of 
ordinary shares

WACC
Weighted average cost of capital

WTI 
West Texas Intermediate

S
h
a
r
e
h
o
d
e
r

l

I

n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

Cautionary statement
This Annual Report contains forward-looking 
statements with respect to the financial 
condition, operations and performance of 
the Group. By their nature, these statements 
involve uncertainty since future events 
and circumstances can cause results and 
developments to differ materially from those 
anticipated. The forward-looking statements 
reflect knowledge and information available at 
the date of preparation of this Annual Report 
and the Company undertakes no obligation 
to update these forward-looking statements. 
Nothing in this Annual Report should be 
construed as a profit forecast.

Designed and produced by Radley Yeldar www.ry.com

Printed in the UK by Pureprint using vegetable 
inksand their environmental printing technology

Pureprint is a CarbonNeutral company. 
Both Manufacturing mill and the printer are 
registered to the Environmental Management 
System ISO14001 and are Forest Stewardship 
Council (FSC) chain-of-custody certified