Trimble Annual Report 2008

← All annual reports

FY2008 Annual Report · Trimble

Loading PDF…

2008 Annual Report

TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS:

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Revenue
in $ millions

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

Our 2008 consisted of two distinct experiences. The first part of

the year was difficult, but we were able to demonstrate improved

financial results. That changed dramatically in mid-September

when the financial crisis intensified. With the resulting drop in

business confidence we saw a significant reduction in demand in

some of our markets. At this point, the outlook for 2009 remains

unclear —although the prospects for a meaningful economic

recovery during the year look increasingly unlikely.

Revenue for 2008 grew 9 percent, non-GAAP operating earnings

were 19 percent of revenue, and non-GAAP EPS grew by 23

percent to $1.54. We encountered difficult market conditions in

the Engineering and Construction segment that worsened late

in the year. Field Solutions segment results were strong due to

significant growth in agriculture. Mobile Solutions segment

04 05 06 07 08

results were disappointing although we believe our orders pipe-

EBITDA
in $ millions

250

200

150

100

line provides the potential for improved results in the second half

of 2009. The Advanced Devices segment produced improved

financial results in spite of market issues in the components business.

Despite the need to respond to current circumstances, Trimble

remains committed to the long view. The arrival of harder times

will require us to more clearly articulate and execute on the

fundamentals we believe will deliver long-term success for our

shareholders, our employees and our other partners. We intend

to create long-term value by achieving compelling leadership in

04 05 06 07 08

our targeted markets coupled together with delivering financial

Cash Flow from Operations
in $ millions

200

160

120

performance well within the top quartile of the universe of

comparable companies.

We achieve market leadership by transforming our users’ work

process through the innovative application of technology. This

transformation enables breakthroughs in user economics through

improved productivity, enhanced quality, lower input costs, and

reduced rework. To deliver these breakthroughs, Trimble pursues

a high level of intimacy with the market and a complete

understanding of user needs and opportunities. This has led to

04 05 06 07 08

an organizational philosophy in which we match our structure to

the market in order both to understand it and to respond quickly

to market needs. The resulting structure has created a relatively

large number of focused businesses within Trimble with each

economy doesn’t rebound strongly or quickly. This relative

assigned a clear market task and the resources necessary to

optimism does require two things: it requires decision makers

achieve it.

to recover some of the confidence about the future which has

been absent since mid-September and it requires credit to fund

Our financial performance expectations are also centered

sound projects.

on these decentralized business units. In return for allowing

them significant operational autonomy we expect significant

We sell ROI, we don’t sell capacity. Although we ask our

accountability for results. Although our primary emphasis is

users to make a long-term investment in Trimble solutions,

on meeting long-term financial targets, we also believe in the

we are unlike most capital goods providers because we can

discipline of producing in the short-term. While the path is not

demonstrate a significant ROI that usually has a payback of less

often clear cut, we have generally demonstrated success in

than a year. We can offer significant value to a business that is

balancing short-term financial results with the need to invest

suffering from the economy and has excess capacity.

the resources necessary to achieve the long-term model. For

most of our businesses we believe the threshold value that

Trimble technology can provide significant competitive

defines success is a non-GAAP operating margin of greater

advantage to users in a challenging time. Those users who

than 20 percent of revenue, which will generate a return well

are willing and able to invest in our technology can operate their

in excess of our cost of capital.

businesses more aggressively than those who won’t, or can’t. For

example, construction contractors can bid jobs more aggressively

The current economic environment has placed this short-term

because of the knowledge that Trimble technology provides them

versus long-term balance under pressure. We continue to

with significant cost control advantages; farmers can make

believe the long-term expectations for our businesses remain

planting decisions knowing they can still make money with

achievable (if, perhaps, on a slower timetable) and our com-

lower commodity prices because of their lower costs; and

mitment to invest in the opportunities remains strong. At the

companies dependent on operating vehicle fleets can meet

same time, we have reacted to the uncertainties about the

market pricing knowing they can substantially reduce the

depth and the length of the current economic slowdown by

costs of fleet operations.

adjusting our approach to planning each business —with the

emphasis on preserving the fundamental financial model of

There are many first-time users left to serve since our markets

each business. In the past, we have generally created both

are substantially unpenetrated. We are usually replacing a

revenue growth and profitability targets for each business.

traditional methodology with our technology and creating a sub-

In the current environment revenue has become significantly

stantial advantage for the user. This contrasts to the incremental

more volatile and our emphasis has shifted, in the short term,

improvement typically seen in a conventional product replacement

to maintaining the relationship between revenue and cost,

cycle. Although a recessionary environment poses challenges, we

whatever the revenue level. As a result of this alignment process

are motivated to bring the message to those in the market who

we eliminated significant cost during 2008 and early 2009. We

have not yet embraced the advantages of the technology to

stand ready to make reasoned adjustments to further changes

enable them to better weather the slowdown.

in the environment.

Let me revisit why we remain committed to the concept of

Emerging economies remain committed to the long-term devel-

growth, despite a difficult environment, and why we believe

opment of their infrastructure although the implementation of

Trimble has the potential to produce results even if the world’s

their plans has become more problematic in the short term.

Investment in infrastructure is continuing during the slowdown.

Much of the economic stimulus being injected around

and competency. They remain the key to using this

the world to counteract the recession, in developed and

slowdown to our advantage and represent a unique

developing countries, is being directed at infrastructure.

resource.

This provides an opportunity for Trimble.

We can introduce new product categories and new busi-

nesses during a recession and create new revenue streams.

This is the implementation of our “adjacency” strategy

which flexes the boundaries of what we define as our

markets. During 2008 we established a number of new

businesses or product categories that either extended our

offerings to existing customers or brought existing capa-

bilities to new customers. This provides incremental new

revenue in the short-term and substantial new long-term

growth platforms.

The environment creates opportunities to use acquisitions

to reinforce or establish long-term growth opportunities.

The use of selective acquisitions has been a mechanism

for Trimble to establish beachheads in new markets or to

add missing products or technologies. This environment

will present both opportunities and risks. In many cases

companies are reassessing their strategies as a result of

the economy with the outcome that desirable assets may

become available at reasonable valuations. It will be

• To maintain and reinforce our business model. We

will work to resolve the balance between short-term

and long-term considerations but will not easily relin-

quish the progress we have made towards world-class

financial performance.

• To use this period as an opportunity to improve. The

benefit of hard times is the requirement to reconsider

the fundamentals. Practices that were acceptable in

easier times can be reconsidered and improved. We

anticipate becoming a more effective company.

• To improve our strategic position. We have a strong

balance sheet, strong operating cash flows, a strong

organization, an abundance of ideas, and the determi-

nation to succeed. We will not hunker down and wait

out the recession but will use this as an opportunity

to intensify our engagement with our markets. We

believe we will be able to look back at this period

as we do the recession of 2001/2002—as a defining

period that created the platform for six years of strong

growth, profitability, and market development.

necessary for us to remain humble in this environment

These are challenging times. In spite of the challenges, we

and to be prudent about taking on new burdens.

continue to create the foundation of future success. My

thanks to our employees and our partners who make up

These factors provide us with the working material to use

that foundation.

this economic dislocation as a defining moment and to

emerge from this period stronger than we entered it. Our

priorities are:

• To retain and reinforce our organizational capabilities.

Our employees have made sacrifices in the last year

as a result of the slowdown and share in the world-

wide stress and uncertainty. Despite these pressures

I am confident of their commitment, adaptability

STEVEN W. BERGLUND

President and Chief Executive Officer

MARKETS SERVED

PRODUCT EXAMPLES

REPRESENTATIVE CUSTOMERS

Engineering and
Construction

56% of total revenue

Survey
Integrated surveying solutions:
GPS/GNSS systems
Robotic, servo and mechanical total stations
Inertial/GPS/GNSS positioning and orientation systems
Digital levels and theodolites

Spatial imaging:
3D laser scanners
Spatial station
Processing, analyzing and information management software

Engineering products:
Data collectors/field computers
Field and office application software

Construction
Machine control systems
GPS/GNSS-based site positioning and measuring systems
Building Information Model (BIM) software
Laser and optical leveling and alignment tools
Field and office application software
Internet and wireless technologies
Life cycle project management solutions
Construction operations and asset management solutions

Surveyors
Civil engineers
Construction contractors
Transportation companies
Cities and governmental agencies
Cadastral agencies and companies
Utility companies
Industrial plant engineers
Oil and gas engineers
Power generation facilities
Mapping contractors
Architects
Specialized applications such as:
Railway monitoring
Tunneling
Mining

Earthmoving contractors
General construction contractors
Concrete contractors
Mechanical, electrical, plumbing contractors
Walls and ceiling contractors
Transportation agencies
Civil engineers and design firms
Construction rental companies

Forestry
Forestry fleet management and optimization solutions

Forestry management companies
Land management companies

Field Solutions

22% of total revenue

Mobile Solutions

13% of total revenue

Infrastructure
GPS/GNSS reference networks and software

GeoSpatial
Road asset management systems
Pavement inspection systems
Aerial LIDAR/imaging systems
Photogrammetry and LIDAR software

Agriculture
Manual and automated steering systems for farm vehicles
Flow and overlap control for chemical, fertilizer, seed application
Grade control systems for irrigation and drainage
Reporting and planning software

Mapping and GIS
Handheld GPS/GNSS
Field and office application software

Utilities
Utility field inspection and asset management tools

Fleet Management
Mobile resource management solutions

Mobile Worker Productivity Solutions
Mobile resource management solutions
Taskforce™ scheduling and dispatch
TrimbleFS
Taskforce Mobile

Advanced Devices

9% of total revenue

Embedded GPS Products
Chipsets and boards
Embedded silicon and firmware

Timing
CDMA and WiMax base station clocks
Time and frequency boards and instruments

Applanix
Integrated inertial/GPS positioning and orientation systems

Defense
GPS receivers for aircraft
Military time and frequency boards

Trimble Outdoors™ Service
Mapping software on GPS-enabled mobile phones
Web-based mapping application

Utility companies
Natural resource agencies
Government agencies

Transportation agencies
Aerial mapping companies
Government agencies

Farmers
Agricultural contractors

Federal, state and local government
Environmental/natural resource agencies
GIS specialists

Water, electric and gas utilities

Construction supply
Transportation and distribution companies
Private fleets

Telco fleets
Direct store delivery
Field service

Electronics OEMs
Portable appliance manufacturers

Wireless infrastructure providers
Wireless location solution providers

Surveying and mapping contractors

U.S. Department of Defense
Allied defense ministries
Defense contractors

Outdoor enthusiasts

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

COMPARISON OF 5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Trimble Navigation Limited, the NASDAQ composite index and the S&P information technology sector index

$300

—

$250

—

$200

—

$150

—

$100

—

$50

—

12/03 12/04 12/05 12/06 12/07 12/08

Trimble Navigation Limited

NASDAQ Composite

S&P Information Technology

* The following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return provided shareholders on Trimble
Navigation Limited’s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the NASDAQ
Composite index and the S&P Information Technology index. An investment of $100 (with
reinvestment of all dividends) is assumed to have been made in our common stock and in each of the
indexes on 12/31/2003 and its relative performance is tracked through 12/31/2008. The Company has
never paid dividends on its Common Stock and has no present plans to do so.

The Company adopted a 52-53 week fiscal year effective upon the end of fiscal year 1997 and the
actual date of the Company’s 2008 fiscal year end was January 2, 2009. Any variations due to any dif-
ferences between the actual date of a particular fiscal year end and the calendar year end for such
year are not expected to be material.

The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Ulf J. Johansson, Ph.D
Chairman
Business Consultant
Director, Telefon AB LM Ericsson

Nickolas W. Vande Steeg
Vice Chairman
Trustee, Azusa Pacific University
Venture Capital Investor
Business Consultant
Director, Wabtec Corporation

Steven W. Berglund
President and Chief Executive Officer

John B. Goodrich
Secretary
Business Consultant

William Hart
Venture Capital Investor
Business Consultant

Merit E. Janow
Professor
International Economic
Law and International Affairs
Columbia University

Bradford W. Parkinson, Ph.D
Professor (Emeritus)
Department of Aeronautics and
Astronautics Stanford University

Corporate Headquarters
Trimble Navigation Limited
935 Stewart Drive
Sunnyvale, California 94085
Phone: (408) 481-8000
www.trimble.com

Independent Auditors
Ernst & Young LLP
San Jose, California

Transfer Agent & Registrar
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
Plaza Level
New York, New York 10038
(800) 937-5449

Investor Relations Contact
(408) 481-7838
investor_relations@trimble.com

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, as filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission, accompanies
this annual report to shareholders and is also available
on the Investor Relations section of the Company’s
website at: www.trimble.com

Trimble Investor Information
Traded: The NASDAQ Stock Exchange
Symbol: TRMB

©2009, Trimble Navigation Limited. All rights reserved.
Trimble and the Globe and Triangle logo, are registered
trademarks of Trimble Navigation Limited. Trimble Outdoors
and Taskforce are trademarks of Trimble Navigation Limited
and its subsidiaries.

Steven W. Berglund
President and Chief Executive Officer

Rajat Bahri
Chief Financial Officer

Richard A. Beyer
Vice President

Bryn Fosburgh
Vice President

Mark A. Harrington
Vice President

Dennis L. Workman
Vice President

Ann Ciganer
Vice President
Strategic Policy

Joseph F. Denniston, Jr.
Vice President
Operations

John E. Huey
Treasurer

James A. Kirkland
Vice President and General Counsel

Jürgen Kliem
Vice President
Strategy and
Business Development

Bruce E. Peetz
Vice President
Advanced Technology and Systems

Julie Shepard
Vice President of Finance

Mary Kay Strangis
Vice President of Human Resources

Australia

Eppings, NSW

Fortitude Valley, QLD

Melbourne, VIC

Canada

Kamloops, British Columbia

Vancouver, British Columbia

Richmond Hill, Ontario

Toronto, Ontario

Montréal, Québec

China

Beijing

Shanghai

France

Fontenay-sous-Bois

Germany

Biberach an der Riß

Braunschweig

Höhenkirchen-Siegertsbrunn

Jena

Kirchheim u.T.-Jesingen

Kaiserslautern

Raunheim

Stuttgart

Wunstorf

India

Chennai

New Delhi

Italy

United Arab Emirates

Vimercate (MI)

Dubai

Japan

Tokyo

Kenya

Nairobi

Korea

Seoul

United Kingdom

Derby

Hook

Ipswich

United States

Huntsville, AL

Tempe, AZ

Folsom, CA

The Netherlands

Fremont, CA

Eersel

New Zealand

Christchurch

Russia

Moscow

Singapore

South Africa

Gauteng

Spain

Madrid

Sweden

Danderyd

Thailand

Bangkok

Long Beach, CA

Redding, CA

Sunnyvale, CA

Westminster, CO

Deerfield Beach, FL

Alpharetta, GA

Ames, IA

Oelwein, IA

Mound City, IL

Waltham, MA

Dayton, OH

Corvallis, OR

Plano, TX

Chantilly, VA

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

Trimble Navigation Limited

935 Stewart Drive

Sunnyvale, California 94085

(408) 481-8000

www.trimble.com

FORM 10 KUNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
⌧ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended January 2, 2009

(cid:133) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________to______________
Commission File Number: 001-14845
TRIMBLE NAVIGATION LIMITED

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

California
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

94-2802192
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

935 Stewart Drive, Sunnyvale, CA
(Address of principal executive offices)

94085
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 481-8000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
Common Stock
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
(Title of Class)

Name of each exchange on which stock registered
NASDAQ Global Select Market
NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ⌧

No (cid:133)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Yes (cid:133)

No ⌧

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ⌧

No (cid:133)

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:134)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.

Large Accelerated Filer ⌧
Non-accelerated Filer (cid:133) (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Accelerated Filer (cid:133)
Smaller Reporting Company (cid:133)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes (cid:133)

No ⌧

As of June 27, 2008, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately
$4.4 billion based on the closing price as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

Indicate the number of share outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class
Common stock, no par value

Outstanding at February 27, 2009
119,093,006 shares

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain parts of Trimble Navigation Limited's Proxy Statement relating to the annual meeting of stockholders to be held
on May 19, 2009 (the "Proxy Statement") are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-
K.

SPECIAL NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are subject to the "safe harbor"
created by those sections. The forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future results of Trimble
Navigation Limited (“Trimble” or “the Company” or “we” or “our” or “us”) are based on current expectations, estimates,
forecasts, and projections about the industries in which Trimble operates and the beliefs and assumptions of the
management of Trimble. Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may be found in "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." In some cases, forward-looking statements
can be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "predicts," "potential," "continue," "expects,"
"anticipates," "future," "intends," "plans," "believes," "estimates," and similar expressions. These forward-looking
statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, levels of activity, performance,
achievements and events to differ materially from those implied by such forward-looking statements, but are not limited
to those discussed in this Report under the section entitled “ Risk Factors” and elsewhere, and in other reports Trimble
files with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), specifically the most recent reports on Form 8-K and Form
10-Q, each as it may be amended from time to time. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We reserve the right to update these statements for any reason, including the occurrence
of material events. The risks and uncertainties under the caption "Risks and Uncertainties" contained herein, among
other things, should be considered in evaluating our prospects and future financial performance. We have attempted to
identify forward-looking statements in this report by placing an asterisk (*) before paragraphs containing such material.

TRIMBLE NAVIGATION LIMITED

2008 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1
Business .......................................................................................................................................................... 5
Item 1A Risk Factors .................................................................................................................................................... 17
Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments ........................................................................................................................... 24
Properties ........................................................................................................................................................ 24
Item 2
Legal Proceedings .......................................................................................................................................... 24
Item 3
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders .................................................................................... 24
Item 4

Item 5

PART II
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities ............................................................................................................................................ 25
Selected Financial Data .................................................................................................................................. 26
Item 6
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations .......................... 26
Item 7
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk ......................................................................... 44
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .............................................................................................. 46
Item 8
Item 9
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ......................... 87
Item 9A Controls and Procedures ................................................................................................................................. 87
Item 9B Other Information ........................................................................................................................................... 87

Item 10
Item 11
Item 12
Item 13
Item 14

PART III
Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance ............................................................................ 88
Executive Compensation ................................................................................................................................ 88
88
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships, Related Transactions, and Director Independence ..................................................... 88
Principal Accountant Fees and Services ......................................................................................................... 88

Item 15

PART IV
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules .................................................................................................. 89

TRADEMARKS

Trimble, EZ-Guide, EZ-Boom, EZ-Steer, Proliance, UtilityCenter, TrimWeb, TrimView, GeoManager, Taskforce, Juno,
GeoExplorer, AgGPS, Spectra Precision, Autopilot, Fieldport, Copernicus, TrimTrac, EZ-Steer, PocketCitation, Trimble
Outdoors, Force, BlueOx, EZ-Office, VX, Vision, VRS, VRSNow, FastMap, Geosite, Coastal Center, NetR8, FineLock,
R-Track, Agriculture Manager, Thunderbolt and Connected Site, among others are trademarks of Trimble Navigation
Limited and its subsidiaries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Item 1. Business

PART I

Trimble Navigation Limited, a California corporation (“Trimble” or “the Company” or “we” or “our” or “us”), provides
advanced positioning product solutions, typically to commercial and government users. The principal application areas
include surveying, agriculture, construction, asset management, mapping and mobile resource management. Our
products provide benefits that can include lower operational costs, higher productivity, and improved quality. Product
examples include agricultural and construction equipment, guidance systems, surveying instruments, systems that track
fleets of vehicles, and data collection systems that enable the management of large amounts of geo-referenced
information. In addition, we also manufacture components for in-vehicle navigation and telematics systems, and timing
modules used in the synchronization of wireless networks.

Our products often combine knowledge of location or position with a wireless link to provide a solution for a specific
application. Position is provided through a number of technologies including the Global Positioning System, or GPS,
and systems that use laser or optical technologies to establish position. Wireless communication techniques include both
public networks, such as cellular, and private networks, such as business band radio. Some of our products are
augmented by our software; this includes embedded firmware that enables the positioning solution and application
software that allows the customer to make use of the positioning information.

We design and market our own products. Our manufacturing strategy includes a combination of in-house assembly and
third party subcontractors. Our global operations include major development, manufacturing or logistics operations in the
United States, Sweden, Germany, New Zealand, France, Canada, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, China, and
India. Products are sold through dealers, representatives, joint ventures, and other channels throughout the world. These
channels are supported by our sales offices located in 17 countries.

We began operations in 1978 and incorporated in California in 1981. Our common stock has been publicly traded on
NASDAQ since 1990 under the symbol TRMB.

On January 17, 2007, our board of directors approved a 2-for-1 split of all outstanding shares of the Company’s
Common Stock, payable February 22, 2007 to stockholders of record on February 8, 2007. All shares and per share
information presented have been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis for all periods presented.

Technology Overview

A significant portion of our revenue is derived from applying Global Navigation Satellite System, or GNSS, technology
to terrestrial applications. The GNSS includes the network of 24 orbiting U.S. Global Positioning System, or GPS, radio
navigation satellites and associated ground control that is funded and maintained by the U.S. Government and is
available worldwide free of direct user fees, and the Russian GLONASS radio navigation satellite system. Both the
European Community and China have announced plans to establish future operational radio navigation satellite systems.
GNSS positioning is based on a technique that precisely measures distances from four or more satellites. The satellites
continuously transmit precisely timed radio signals using extremely accurate atomic clocks. A GNSS receiver measures
distances from the satellites in view by determining the travel time of a signal from the satellite to the receiver, and then
uses those distances to compute its position. Under normal circumstances, a stand-alone GNSS receiver is able to
calculate its position at any point on earth, in the earth's atmosphere, or in lower earth orbit, to approximately 10 meters,
24 hours a day. Much better accuracies are possible through a technique called “differential GNSS.” In addition to
providing position, GNSS provides extremely accurate time measurement.

GNSS accuracy is dependent upon the locations of the receiver and the number of GNSS satellites that are above the
horizon at any given time. Reception of GNSS signals requires line-of-sight visibility between the satellites and the
receiver, which can be blocked by buildings, hills, and dense foliage. The receiver must have a line of sight to at least
four satellites to determine its latitude, longitude, and time. The accuracy of GNSS may also be limited by distortion of
GNSS signals from ionospheric and other atmospheric conditions.

Our GNSS products are based on proprietary receiver technology. Over time, the advances in positioning, wireless
communications, and information technologies have enabled us to add more capability to our products and thereby
deliver more value to our users. For example, the developments in wireless technology and deployments of next

generation wireless networks have enabled less expensive wireless communications. These developments provide the
efficient transfer of position data to locations away from the positioning field device, allowing the data to be accessed by
more users, thereby increasing productivity. This allows us to integrate visualization and design software into some of
our systems, as well as offer positioning services, all of which make our customers more efficient at what they do.

Our laser and optical products either measure distances and angles to provide a position in three dimensional space or are
used as highly accurate laser references from which a position can be established. The key elements of these products are
typically a laser, which is generally a commercially available laser diode, and a complex mechanical assembly. These
elements are augmented by software algorithms to provide measurements and application-specific solutions.

Business Strategy

Our business strategy is developed around an analysis of several key elements:

• Attractive markets – We focus on underserved markets that offer potential for revenue growth, profitability, and

market leadership.

•

Innovative solutions that provide significant benefits to our customers – We seek to apply our technology to
applications in which position data is important and where we can create unique value by enabling enhanced
productivity in the field or field to back office. We look for opportunities in which the rate of technological
change is high and which have a requirement for the integration of multiple technologies into a solution.

• Distribution channels to best access our markets – We select distribution channels that best serve the needs of
individual markets. These channels can include independent dealers, direct sales, joint ventures, OEM sales, and
distribution alliances with key partners. We view international expansion as an important element of our
strategy and seek to develop international channels.

Business Segments and Markets

We are organized into four reporting segments encompassing our various applications and product lines: Engineering
and Construction, Field Solutions, Mobile Solutions and Advanced Devices. Our segments are distinguished by the
markets they serve. Each segment consists of businesses which are responsible for product development, marketing,
sales, strategy, and financial performance.

Engineering and Construction

Products in the Engineering and Construction segment improve productivity and accuracy throughout the entire
construction process including the initial survey, planning, design, site preparation, and building phases. Our products
are intended to both improve the productivity of each phase, as well as facilitate the entire process by improving
information flow from one phase to the next.

The product solutions typically include multiple technologies. The elements of these solutions may incorporate GPS,
optical, laser, radio, or cellular communications.

An example of the customer benefits provided by our products is our GPS and robotic optical surveying instruments
which enable the surveyor to perform operations in the field faster, more reliably than conventional surveying
instruments and with a smaller crew. Similarly, our construction machine guidance products allow the operator to
achieve the desired landform while eliminating stakeout and reducing rework. These steps in the construction process
can be readily linked together with data collection modules to minimize the time and effort required to maintain data
accuracy throughout the entire construction process.

We sell and distribute our products in this segment through a global network of independent dealers that are supported
by Trimble personnel. This channel is supplemented by relationships that create additional channel breadth including
our joint ventures with Caterpillar and Nikon, as well as private branding arrangements with other companies.

We also design and market handheld data collectors and data collection software for field use by surveyors, contractors,
and other professionals. These products are sold directly through dealers and other survey manufacturers.

Competitors in this segment are typically companies that provide optical, laser, or GPS positioning products. Our
principal competitors are Topcon Corporation, and Leica Geosystems, Inc. Price points in this segment range from less
than $1,000 for certain laser systems to approximately $100,000 for a high-precision, three-dimensional, machine control
system.

Representative products sold in this segment include:

Trimble S8 Total Station – Our S8 Total Station is our most advanced optical instrument designed to deliver
unsurpassed performance for both typical surveying and specialized engineering applications such as monitoring and
tunneling. It features Trimble FineLock™ technology, a smart tracker sensor with a narrow field of view that enables the
Trimble S8 to detect a target without interference from surrounding prisms. Our S8 combined with our 4D Control
software creates a powerful solution for real-time and post-processed monitoring of permanent structures such as dams,
short-term construction activities, and side slopes in mines.

Trimble I.S. Rover – Our I.S. Rover combines GNSS and optical data collection on a rover pole, enabling surveyors to
harness the unique strengths of both technologies. With it, surveyors can increase flexibility and save time by seamlessly
switching between technologies to adapt to local jobsite conditions as well as independently verify measurements for
quality control. Our I.S. Rover is a unique patented Trimble solution that offers land surveyors increased efficiency,
flexibility and versatility.

Trimble R8 GNSS System – Our R8 GNSS System is a multi-channel, multi-frequency, Global Navigation Satellite
System (GNSS) receiver, antenna, and data-link radio combined in one compact unit. It features Trimble R-Track™
technology, powered by the most advanced RTK engine in the industry, supporting all GPS signals, including GPS
Modernization (L2C signal and L5 signals) as well as GLONASS. Our R8 GNSS combines advanced receiver
technology and a proven system design to provide maximum accuracy and productivity for a variety of surveying
applications.

Trimble VX Spatial Station – Our Trimble VX™ Spatial Station is an advanced spatial imaging system that combines
optical, 3D scanning, and video capabilities—Trimble VISION™ technology—to measure objects in 3D to produce 2D
and 3D data sets for spatial imaging projects. It enables users to blend extremely accurate ground-based information
with airborne data to provide comprehensive datasets for use in the geospatial information industry. An entry-level
model of our VX Spatial Station offers integrated imaging and surveying functionality only, with a scalable upgrade to
3D scanning.

SPS Site Positioning Solutions – The Trimble Site Positioning Solutions family increases the productivity of
construction professionals and supervisors during site preparation, layout and grade checking by simplifying workflows,
eliminating unnecessary steps, and providing intelligent data management between the field and the office, creating time
savings by providing data updates to all members of the team.

GCS Family of Grade Control Systems – Grade control systems meet construction contractors' needs with
productivity-enhancing solutions for earthmoving, site prep, and roadwork. Our GCS family provides upgrade options
that deliver earthmoving contractors the flexibility to select a system that meets their daily needs today, and later add on
to meet their changing needs. For example, a single control system such as the GCS300 can provide for low-cost point of
entry into grade control, and over time can be upgraded to the GCS400 dual sensor system or to the full 3D GCS900
Grade Control System.

Spectra Precision Laser Portable Tools – Our Spectra Precision® Laser family includes a broad range of laser based
tools for the interior, drywall and ceilings, HVAC, and mechanical contractor. Designed to replace traditional methods of
measurement and leveling for a wide range of interior construction applications, our laser tools are easy to learn and use.
Our Spectra Precision Laser product portfolio includes rotating lasers for horizontal leveling and vertical alignment, as
well as laser pointers and a laser based distance measuring device. They are available through independent and national
construction supply houses both in the U.S. and in Europe.

Proliance Software – Proliance® Software allows infrastructure-intensive organizations to optimize the Plan-Build-
Operate project lifecycle for complex capital projects, construction and real estate programs, and extensive facility
portfolios. Our Proliance Software was designed for large building owner/operators, real estate developers, and engineering-
driven organizations managing $250 million or more annually in new project construction or facility renovations.

GeoSpatial Solutions – Our GeoSpatial Solutions family enables mobile mapping companies to capture georeferenced
data, extract features and attributes, and analyze conditions and change, thereby generating information to better manage
assets and operations. Aerial LIDAR / Imaging Systems and vehicle-based asset inventory systems, combined with
powerful photogrammetry software, generate high accuracy as-built drawings for the transportation, and utilities and
energy transmission and distribution industries.

Field Solutions

Our Field Solutions segment addresses the agriculture and geographic information system (GIS) markets.

Our agriculture products consist of manual and automated navigation guidance for tractors and other farm equipment
used in spraying, planting, cultivation, and harvesting applications. The benefits to the farmer include faster machine
operation, higher yields, and lower consumption of chemicals than conventional equipment. We also provide positioning
solutions for leveling agricultural fields in irrigation applications and aligning drainage systems to better manage water
flow in fields. We also provide solutions to automate applications of pesticide and seeding.

We use multiple distribution channels to access the agricultural market, including independent dealers and partners such
as CNH Global. Competitors in this market are either vertically integrated implement companies such as John Deere, or
agricultural instrumentation suppliers such as Raven, Hemisphere GPS and Novariant.

Our GIS product line is centered on handheld data collectors that gather information in the field to be incorporated into
GIS databases. Typically this information includes features, attributes, and positions of fixed infrastructure and natural
resource assets. An example would be a utility company performing a survey of its transmission poles including the age
and condition of each telephone pole. Our handheld unit enables this data to be collected and automatically stored while
confirming the location of the asset. The data can then be downloaded into a GIS database. This stored data could later
be used to navigate back to any individual asset or item for maintenance or data update. Our mobile GIS initiative goes
one step further by allowing this information to be communicated from the field worker to the back-office GIS database
through the combination of wireless technologies, as well as giving the field worker the ability to download information
from the database. This capability provides significant advantages to users including improved productivity, accuracy,
and access to the information in the field.

Our Utilities Field Solutions product line is focused on integrated field and back office software solutions for
managing utility mobile workers and their field work activities, including asset maintenance, GIS mapping, outage
response, and automated vehicle locating (AVL). Our software is typically installed on a server and on mobile
computers that are used by utility field workers for conducting routine and emergency work, locating and mapping
infrastructure, and performing utility asset maintenance, inspection, and field service. Through the use of GIS and
location-based technologies combined with mobile and wireless communications, our products connect utility field
workers to the office. Typically our products automate existing manual and paper based processes and are
implemented to meet utility regulatory requirements, improve efficiency and reduce costs, and improve customer
service and response.

Distribution for GIS products is primarily through a network of independent dealers and business partners, supported by
Trimble personnel. Primary markets for our GIS products and solutions include both governmental and commercial
users. Users are most often municipal governments and natural resource agencies. Commercial users include utility
companies. Competitors in this market are typically survey instrument companies utilizing GPS technology such as
Topcon and Thales.

Sales and distribution of both our Fieldport® and UtilityCenter® software solutions are direct
the
customer. Installation of both solutions generally involves a degree of integration and professional services. Primary
markets include government and commercial electric, gas, water and wastewater utilities. Competitors are typically
utility industry GIS software and service companies.

Approximate product price points in this segment range from $1,000 for a GIS handheld unit to $35,000 for a fully
automated, farm equipment control system.

Representative products sold within this segment include:

AgGPS EZ-Guide 500 – Our AgGPS EZ-Guide 500 is a lightbar guidance system with a color LCD display, data
logging functions and multiple accuracy options. Lightbar systems provide GPS-based guidance for vehicle operators to
steer tractors, sprayers, fertilizer applicators, air seeders, and large tillage tools that require consistent pass-to-pass
accuracy to help save fuel, increase efficiency, and reduce input costs for agricultural operations.

AgGPS EZ-Boom 2010 – Our AgGPS® EZ-Boom® 2010 automated application control system is designed to help
growers cut input costs and reduce operator fatigue by providing precise automatic control of field spraying
applications. It works with our AgGPS EZ-Guide® Plus lightbar guidance system, AgGPS EZ-Steer® assisted steering
system, or the AgGPS Autopilot™ automated steering system.

AgGPS Autopilot System – Our GPS-enabled, agricultural navigation system connects to a tractor’s steering system
and automatically steers the tractor along a precise path to within three centimeters or less. This enables both higher
machine productivity and more precise application of seed and chemicals, thereby reducing costs to the farmer.

AgGPS EZ-Steer System – Our value added assisted steering system, when combined with our EZ-Guide Plus system,
automatically steers agricultural vehicles along a path within 20 centimeters or less. This system installs in less than
thirty minutes and is designed to reduce gaps and overlaps in spraying, fertilizing, and other field applications, as well as
reduce operator fatigue.

Juno Series – Our Juno family includes compact and cost-effective GPS handhelds designed to equip an entire
workforce for data collection and fieldwork. The handhelds have a high-sensitivity GPS receiver, Bluetooth and Wireless
LAN technology, a built-in 3 Megapixel digital camera, a MicroSD/SDHC storage slot and an optional 3.5G broadband
cellular modem for wireless data communications.

GeoExplorer 2008 Series – Our GeoExplorer family combines a GPS receiver in a rugged handheld unit running
industry standard Microsoft Windows Mobile version 6.0, making it easy to collect and maintain data about objects in
the field. The GeoExplorer® series features three models ranging in accuracy from a decimeter to 1-3 meters, thereby
allowing the user to select the system most appropriate for their data collection and maintenance needs.

Fieldport Software – Our Fieldport Software focuses on automating field service processes, operational efficiency and
profitability for water and wastewater utility customers.

UtilityCenter Software – Our UtilityCenter Software is a GIS-based enterprise suite of modules oriented towards the
electric and gas utilities market. Modules include Outage Management (OMS), Mobile Asset Management, Data
Collection, Staking, Network Tracing & Isolation and Field-based Editing.

Mobile Solutions

Our Mobile Solutions segment provides both hardware and software applications for managing mobile work, mobile workers
and mobile assets. The software is provided in both a client server model or web-based. Our software is provided through our
hosted platform for a monthly subscription service fee or as a perpetual license with annual maintenance and support fees.

Our vehicle solutions typically include an onboard proprietary hardware device consisting of a GPS receiver, business
logic, sensor interface, and a wireless modem. Our solution usually includes the communication service from/to the
vehicle to our data center and access over the internet to the application software.

Our mobile worker solutions include a rugged handset device and software designed to automate service technician work
in the field at the point of customer contact. The mobile worker handset solutions also synchronize to a client server at
the back office for integration with other mission-critical business applications.

Our scheduling and dispatch solution is an enterprise software program to optimize scheduling and routing of field
service technicians. For dynamic capacity management, our capacity planner, capacity controller, and intelligent
appointer modules round out this innovative service delivery automation technology.

One element of our market strategy targets opportunities in specific vertical markets where we believe we can provide a
unique value to the end-user by tailoring our solutions for a particular industry. Sample markets include Construction
Supply, Direct Store Delivery and Public Safety. For example, our ready mix concrete solution combines a suite of
sensors with our in-vehicle wireless platform providing fleets with updated vehicle status that requires no driver
interaction – referred to as “auto-status.”

We also sell our vehicle solutions using a horizontal market strategy that focuses on providing turnkey solutions to a
broad range of service fleets that span a large number of market segments. Here, we leverage our capabilities without the
same level of customization. These solutions are sold to the general service fleets as well as transportation and
distribution fleets both on a direct basis and through dealer channels.

Our enterprise strategy focuses on sales to large, enterprise accounts with more than 1,000 vehicles or routes. Here, in
addition to a Trimble-hosted solution, we can also integrate our service directly into the customer’s IT infrastructure,
giving them improved control of their information. In this market we sell directly to end-users. Sales cycles tend to be
long due to field trials followed by an extensive decision-making process.

Approximate prices for hardware fall in the range of $400 to $3,000, while the monthly subscription service fees range
from approximately $25 to approximately $55 per month per unit, depending on the customer service level.

We have also entered into new markets by acquisitions of @Road, Inc. (@Road) in 2007, and Eleven Technology, Inc.,
Advanced Public Safety, Inc. (APS) and Visual Statement, Inc. (VS) in 2006. @Road is a global provider of solutions
designed to automate the management of mobile resources and to optimize the service delivery process for customers
across a variety of industries under the GeoManager™ and Taskforce® brand names. Eleven Technology is a mobile
application software company with market and technology position in the Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG) industry.
APS provides mobile and handheld software products used by law enforcement, fire rescue and other public safety
agencies. VS provides desktop software and enterprise solutions for collision and crime incident analysis, reporting and
workflow management.

Representative products sold in this segment include:

Fleet Productivity – Our fleet productivity solution offerings are comprised of the TrimWeb™, GeoManager and
TrimView™ mobile platforms. The TrimWeb and GeoManager systems provide different levels of service that run from
snapshots of fleet activity to real-time fleet dispatch capability via access to the web-based platform through a secure
internet connection. The TrimWeb and GeoManager systems include truck communication service and computer
backbone support of the service. TrimView is sold to fleets where system integration into back office applications is
required for more robust information flow.

Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG) – This software solution operates in the Microsoft CE/Pocket or WinMobile PC
environment and addresses the pre-sales, delivery, route sales and full service vending functions performed by mobile
workers. Customers within the CPG market purchase a combination of both license software and handheld PCs. The
software handles all communications from/to the mobile computer as well as from/to the host and any other ERP or
decision support systems.

Field Service – Our handset-based mobile solution enables technicians to maintain and repair residential and
commercial appliances, office equipment, medical equipment, refrigeration equipment, fountain, and manufacturing
equipment, and manage a variety of service functions including wireless dispatching of service calls, real-time
messaging, spare parts management, and work order and workflow management. Trimble Field Service customers have
benefited from increased service calls per day, an increase in first call resolution and reduction in administrative
workload to name a few results.

Public Safety – We provide a suite of solutions for the public safety sector including our PocketCitation™ system,
which is an electronic ticketing system that enables law enforcement officers to issue traffic citations utilizing a mobile
handheld device. This system scans the traffic offender’s driver’s license and automatically populates the appropriate
information into the citation. We provide a variation of this solution which enables law enforcement officers to complete
electronic traffic citations within 30 seconds. Within this sector we also provide desktop software which enables accident
investigators and other public safety professionals to reconstruct and simulate vehicle accidents.

Taskforce – The Taskforce software solution provides scheduling and dispatch solutions for field service technicians by
synchronizing the right human and physical resources required to optimize a field service resource network. The system
manages significant numbers of dynamic scheduling resources in an unpredictable field service environment to increase
productivity, field force utilization and control-to-field employee ratios.

Advanced Devices

Advanced Devices includes the product lines from our Component Technologies, Applanix, Trimble Outdoors, and
Military and Advanced Systems (MAS) businesses. With the exception of Trimble Outdoors and Applanix these
businesses share several common characteristics: they are hardware centric, generally market to original equipment
manufacturers (OEM), system integrators or service providers, and have products that can be utilized in a number of
different end-user markets and applications. The various operations that comprise this segment were aggregated on the
basis that no single operation accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue, operating income or assets.

Within Component Technologies, we supply GPS modules, licensing and complementary technologies, and GPS-
integrated sub-system solutions for applications requiring precise position, time or frequency. Component Technologies
serves a broad range of vertical markets including telecommunications automotive electronics, and commercial
electronics. Sales are made directly to OEMs, system integrators, value-added resellers and service providers who
incorporate our components into a complete system-level solution.

Component Technologies has developed GPS technologies which it is making available for license. These
technologies can run on certain digital signal processors (DSP) or microprocessors, removing the need for dedicated
GPS baseband signal processor chips. We have a cooperative licensing deal with Nokia for our Global Navigation
Satellite System (GNSS) patents related to designated wireless products and services involving location technologies,
such as GPS, assisted GPS or Galileo. The licensing agreement is exclusive to Nokia for the wireless consumer
product and service domain and includes sublicensing rights. In return, Trimble receives a non-exclusive license to
Nokia’s location-based patents for use in Trimble's commercial products and services. We also have a licensing
agreement with Marvell Semiconductors for our full GPS Digital Signal Processor software as well as tools for
development support and testing. Access to our GPS technology complements Marvell's wireless and application
processor initiatives for WiFi, Bluetooth, FM, multi-function radio, application processors and cellular processor
devices.

Our MAS business supplies GPS receivers and embedded modules that use the military’s GPS advanced capabilities.
The modules are principally used in aircraft navigation and timing applications. Military products are sold directly to
either the U.S. Government or defense contractors. Sales are also made to authorized foreign end users. Competitors in
this market include Rockwell Collins, L3, and Raytheon.

Our Trimble Outdoors business utilizes GPS-enabled cell phones to provide information for outdoor recreational
activities. Some of the recreational activities include hiking, biking, backpacking, boating, and water sports. Consumers
purchase the Trimble Outdoors product through our wireless operator partners which include Sprint-Nextel,
SouthernLINC Wireless and Boost Mobile.

Our Applanix business is a leading provider of advanced products and enabling solutions that maximize productivity
through mobile mapping and positioning to professional markets worldwide. Applanix develops, manufactures, sells and
supports high-value, precision products that combine GPS with inertial sensors for accurate measurement of position and
attitude, flight management systems, and scalable mobile mapping solutions used in airborne, land and marine
applications. Sales are made by our direct sales force to end users, systems integrators, and OEMs, and through regional
agents. Competitors include Leica, IGI and Novatel.

Representative products sold by this segment include:

GPS Receiver Modules – The Lassen®, Copernicus® , CondorTM and PandaTM families of GPS modules are full-
function GPS modules in a variety of form factors, some smaller than your fingertip.

TrimTrac Locator – Our TrimTrac® product is a complete end user device that combines GPS functionality with
global system for mobile communications (GSM) wireless communications. In 2006, we added to the TrimTrac locator
full quad-band GSM and general packet radio service (GPRS) support along with several important application level

features. The device is suitable for high volume personal vehicle and commercial asset management applications that
demand a low-cost locator.

TM3000 Asset Tracking Device – Our TM3000 product is a flexible, open platform that enables a broad range of
applications such as: fleet management, mobile asset tracking and recovery and driver monitoring and assistance. This
device integrates wireless communications, a positioning function and an application engine in a package designed to
improve the profits for service-focused businesses.

Thunderbolt GPS Disciplined Clock – Our Thunderbolt® clock is a fifth-generation product from our GPS Timing and
Synchronization division, which outputs precision time and frequency. It also serves as the architectural basis for GPS
disciplined clocks sold to manufacturers of CDMA and WiMax infrastructure.

Applanix POS/AV System – Our integrated GPS/inertial system for airborne surveying measures aircraft position to an
accuracy of a few centimeters and aircraft attitude (angular orientation) to an accuracy of 30 arc seconds or better. This
system is typically interfaced to large format cameras and scanning lasers for producing geo-referenced topographic
maps of the terrain.

Applanix DSS Digital Sensor System – Our digital airborne imaging solution produces high-resolution orthophoto
map products. Certified by the USGS, the system consists of a mapping grade digital camera that is tightly integrated
with a GNSS/Inertial system, flight management system (FMS) and processing software for automatic geo-referencing
of each pixel. Our DSS can be used stand-alone or integrated with other airborne mapping sensors. Our DSS has been
used by organizations worldwide in a variety of market segments that include ortho mapping, utility and transportation
corridor mapping and rapid response applications.

Force 524D Module – This dual frequency, embedded GPS module is used in a variety of military airborne applications.

Trimble Outdoors Service – Our trip planning and navigation software works with GPS-enabled cell phones and
conventional GPS receivers. This software enables consumers to research specific trips on-line as part of trip pre-
planning. In addition, users are able to share outdoor and off-road experiences on-line with their friends and family.

Acquisitions and Joint Ventures

Our growth strategy is centered on developing and marketing innovative and complete value-added solutions to our
existing customers, while also marketing them to new customers and geographic regions. In some cases, this has led to
partnering with or acquiring companies that bring technologies, products or distribution capabilities that will allow us to
establish a market beach head, penetrate a market more effectively, or develop solutions more quickly than if we had
done so solely through internal development. Since 1999, this has led us to form four joint ventures and acquire thirty
seven companies through the end of fiscal 2008. Most of these acquisitions have been small, both in dollar terms and in
number of people added to the Trimble employee base. No assurance can be given that our previous or future
acquisitions will be successful or will not materially adversely affect our financial condition or operating results. The
following companies and joint ventures were acquired or formed during fiscal 2008 and are combined in the results of
operations since the date of acquisition or formation:

Rawson Control Systems

On December 3, 2008, we acquired the assets of privately-held Rawson Control Systems based in Oelwein, Iowa.
Rawson manufactures hydraulic and electronic controls for the agriculture equipment industry, including variable rate
planter drives and controllers, variable rate fertilizer controllers, mechanical remote electric control valves and speed
reducers. Rawson Control Systems’ performance is reported under our Field Solutions business segment.

FastMap and GeoSite

On November 28, 2008, we acquired the FastMap and GeoSite software assets from Korec, a privately-held Trimble
distributor serving the United Kingdom and Ireland. FastMap and GeoSite performance is reported under our
Engineering and Construction and Field Solutions business segments, respectively.

Callidus Precision Systems

On November 28, 2008, we acquired the assets of privately-held Callidus Precision Systems GmbH of Halle, Germany.
Callidus is a provider of 3D laser scanning solutions for the industrial market. Callidus performance is reported under
our Engineering and Construction business segment.

Toposys

On November 13, 2008, we acquired TopoSys GmbH of Biberach an der Riss, Germany. TopoSys is a leading provider
of aerial data collection systems comprised of LiDAR and metric cameras. TopoSys’s performance is reported under our
Engineering and Construction business segment.

TruCount

On October 30, 2008, we acquired the assets of privately-held TruCount, Inc., of Ames, Iowa. TruCount is a leading
manufacturer of air and electric clutches that automate individual planter row shut-off. TruCount’s performance is
reported under our Field Solutions business segment.

RolleiMetric

On October 20, 2008, we acquired the assets of RolleiMetric from Rollei GmbH of Braunschweig, Germany.
RolleiMetric is a leading provider of metric camera systems for aerial imaging and terrestrial close range
photogrammetry. RolleiMetric is reported within our Engineering and Construction business segment.

VirtualSite Solutions

On October 3, 2008, VirtualSite Solutions (VSS), a joint venture formed by Caterpillar and us began operations. We
contributed $7.8 million in exchange for a 65% ownership and Caterpillar contributed $4.2 million for a 35% ownership
in VSS. VSS develops software for fleet management and connected worksite solutions for both Caterpillar and us, and
in turn, sells software subscription services to Caterpillar and us, which we both sell through our respective distribution
channels. For financial reporting purposes, VSS’s assets and liabilities are consolidated with ours, as are its results of
operations, which are reported under our Engineering and Construction segment. Caterpillar’s 35% interest is included
in our Consolidated Financial Statements as minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries.

SECO

On July 29, 2008, we acquired privately-held SECO Manufacturing Company of Redding, California. SECO is a leading
manufacturer of accessories for the geomatics, surveying, mapping, and construction industries. SECO’s performance is
reported under our Engineering and Construction business segment.

Géo-3D

On January 22, 2008, we acquired privately-held Géo-3D Inc. of Montreal, Canada. Géo-3D is a leader in roadside
infrastructure asset inventory solutions. Géo-3D’s performance is reported under our Engineering and Construction business
segment.

Crain Enterprises

On January 8, 2008, we acquired privately-held Crain Enterprises, Inc. of Mound City, Illinois. Crain is a leading
manufacturer of accessories for the geomatics, surveying, mapping, and construction industries. Crain Enterprises is
reported under our Engineering and Construction business segment.

Patents, Licenses and Intellectual Property

We hold approximately 720 U.S. issued and enforceable patents and approximately 121 non-U.S. patents, the majority of
which cover GPS technology and other applications such as optical and laser technology.

We prefer to own the intellectual property used in our products, either directly or through subsidiaries. From time to time
we license technology from third parties.

There are approximately 236 trademarks registered to Trimble and its subsidiaries including "Trimble," "AgGPS,"
“Spectra Precision,” and "GeoExplorer," among others that are registered in the United States and other countries.
Additional trademarks are pending registration.

Sales and Marketing

We tailor the distribution channel to the needs of our products and regional markets through a number of sales channel
solutions around the world. We sell our products worldwide primarily through dealers, distributors, and authorized
representatives, occasionally granting exclusive rights to market certain products within specific countries. This channel
is supported and supplemented (where third party distribution is not available) by our regional sales offices throughout
the world. We also utilize distribution alliances, OEM relationships, and joint ventures with other companies as a means
to serve selected markets.

During fiscal 2008, sales to customers in the United States represented 49%, Europe represented 25%, Asia Pacific
represented 14%, and other regions represented 12% of our total revenue. During fiscal 2007, sales to customers in the
United States represented 50%, Europe represented 27%, Asia Pacific represented 12%, and other regions represented
11% of our total revenue. During fiscal 2006, sales to customers in the United States represented 54%, Europe
represented 25%, Asia Pacific represented 12%, and other regions represented 9% of our total revenue.

Warranty

The warranty periods for our products are generally between 90 days and three years. Selected military programs may
require extended warranty periods up to 5.5 years and certain Nikon products have a five-year warranty period. We
support our GPS products through a circuit board replacement program from locations in the United Kingdom, Germany,
Japan, and the United States. The repair and calibration of our non-GPS products are available from company-owned or
authorized facilities. We reimburse dealers and distributors for all authorized warranty repairs they perform.

While we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the
quality of component suppliers, our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and service
delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Should actual product failure rates, material usage, or service
delivery costs differ from the estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty accrual and related costs may be required.

Seasonality of Business

* Our individual segment revenue may be affected by seasonal buying patterns. Typically, the second fiscal quarter has
been the strongest quarter for the Company driven by the construction buying season.

Backlog

In most of our markets, the time between order placement and shipment is short. Orders are generally placed by
customers on an as-needed basis. In general, customers may cancel or reschedule orders without penalty. For these
reasons, we do not believe that orders are an accurate measure of backlog and, therefore, we believe that backlog is not a
meaningful indicator of future revenue or material to understanding our business.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing of many of our GPS products is subcontracted to Flextronics International Limited. We utilize
Flextronics for all of our Component Technologies products, and for some of our Construction and Survey, Field
Solutions, and Mobile Solutions products. We also utilize Flextronics for our high-end GPS products and new product
introduction services. Flextronics is responsible for substantially all material procurement, assembly, and testing. We
continue to manage product design through pilot production for the subcontracted products, and we are directly involved
in qualifying suppliers and key components used in all our products. Our current contract with Flextronics continues in
effect until either party gives the other ninety days written notice.

We manufacture laser and optics-based products at our plants in Dayton, Ohio; Danderyd, Sweden; Jena and
Kaiserslautern, Germany; and Shanghai, China. Some of these products or portions of these products are also
subcontracted to third parties for assembly.

Our design and manufacturing sites in Dayton, Ohio; Sunnyvale, California; Danderyd, Sweden; and Jena and
Kaiserslautern, Germany are registered to ISO9001:2000, covering the design, production, distribution, and servicing of
all our products.

Research and Development

We believe that our competitive position is maintained through the development and introduction of new products that
incorporate improved features, better performance, smaller size and weight, lower cost, or some combination of these
factors. We invest substantially in the development of new products. We also make significant investment in the
positioning, communication, and information technologies that underlie our products and will likely provide competitive
advantages.

Our research and development expenditures, net of reimbursed amounts were $148.3 million for fiscal 2008, $131.5
million for fiscal 2007, and $103.8 million for fiscal 2006.

* We expect to continue investing in research and development with the goal of maintaining or improving our
competitive position, as well as the goal of entering new markets.

Employees

As of January 2, 2009, we employed 3,940 employees, including 24% in manufacturing, 29% in engineering, 35% in
sales and marketing, and 12% in general and administrative positions. Approximately 43% of employees are in locations
outside the United States.

Our employees are not represented by unions except for those in Sweden. Some employees in Germany are represented
by works councils. We also employ temporary and contract personnel that are not included in the above headcount
numbers. We have not experienced work stoppages or similar labor actions.

Available Information

The Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all
amendments
through
www.trimble.com/investors.html, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained on our web site is not part of this annual
report on Form 10-K.

reports are available

the Company’s web

free of charge on

those

site

In addition, you may request a copy of these filings (excluding exhibits) at no cost by writing or telephoning us at our
principal executive offices at the following address or telephone number:

Trimble Navigation Limited
935 Stewart Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94085
Attention: Investor Relations Telephone: 408-481-8000

Executive Officers

The names, ages, and positions of the Company's executive officers as of February 21, 2009 are as follows:

Name
Steven W. Berglund
Rajat Bahri
Rick Beyer
Bryn A. Fosburgh
Mark A. Harrington
Jürgen Kliem
James A. Kirkland
Julie Shepard
Dennis L. Workman

Age
57
44
51
46
53
51
49
51
64

Position
President and Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Vice President
Vice President
Vice President
Vice President
Vice President and General Counsel
Vice President, Finance
Vice President and Chief Technical Officer

Steven W. Berglund – Steven Berglund has served as president and chief executive officer of Trimble since March 1999.
Prior to joining Trimble, Mr. Berglund was president of Spectra Precision, a group within Spectra Physics AB, and a
pioneer in the development of laser systems. He spent 14 years at Spectra Physics in a variety of senior leadership
positions. In the early 1980s, Mr. Berglund spent a number of years at Varian Associates in Palo Alto, where he held a
variety of planning and manufacturing roles. Mr. Berglund began his career as a process engineer at Eastman Kodak in
Rochester, New York. He attended the University of Oslo and the University of Minnesota where he received a B.S. in
chemical engineering. He later received his M.B.A. from the University of Rochester. In December 2007, Mr. Berglund
was elected to the board of directors of Verigy Ltd. a semiconductor test equipment manufacturer.

Rajat Bahri – Rajat Bahri joined Trimble as chief financial officer in January 2005. Prior to joining Trimble, Mr. Bahri
served for more than 15 years in various capacities within the financial organization of several subsidiaries of Kraft
Foods, Inc. and General Foods Corporation. Most recently, he served as the chief financial officer for Kraft Canada,
Inc. From June 2000 to June 2001, he served as chief financial officer of Kraft Pizza Company. From 1997 to 2000, Mr.
Bahri was Operations Controller for Kraft Jacobs Suchard Europe. Mr. Bahri holds a Bachelor of Commerce from the
University of Delhi in 1985 and an M.B.A. from Duke University in 1987. In 2005, he was elected to the board of STEC,
Inc., a memory storage manufacturer.

Richard A. Beyer – Rick Beyer joined Trimble in March 2004 as president of Trimble Mobile Solutions and in May
2006, Mr. Beyer was appointed a vice president of Trimble. In October 2007 his role was expanded to include
responsibility for a number of Trimble’s mobile solutions business divisions. Prior to joining Trimble, Mr. Beyer held
senior executive positions within the wireless mobile solutions industry since 1987. Part of the original senior executive
team that launched Qualcomm's OmniTRAC's mobile satellite communication solution, Mr. Beyer also held the
positions of general manager at Rockwell Collins, on-board computing division, from 1994 to 1995; executive vice
president of Norcom Networks from 1995 to 1999; president of Husky Technologies, now part of Itronix, from 1999 to
2000; and CEO of TracerNet, which was acquired by Trimble, from 2002 to 2004. Mr. Beyer holds a B.A. from
Olivet College.

Bryn A. Fosburgh – Bryn Fosburgh joined Trimble in 1994 as a technical service manager for surveying, mining, and
construction. In 1997, Mr. Fosburgh was appointed director of development for the Company’s land survey business unit
where he oversaw the development of field and office software that enabled the interoperability of Trimble survey
products. From October 1999 to July 2002, he served as division vice president of survey and infrastructure. From 2002
to 2005, Mr. Fosburgh served as vice president and general manager of Trimble's Geomatics and Engineering business
area, with responsibility for all the division-level activities associated with survey, construction, and infrastructure
solutions. In January 2005, he was appointed vice president and general manager of the Engineering and Construction
Division. In October 2007 his role was expanded to include a number of divisions, including construction and
agriculture, as well as a responsibility for a number of corporate functions and geographical regions. Prior to Trimble, he
was a civil engineer with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation responsible for coordinating the planning, data
acquisition, and data analysis for statewide GPS surveying projects in support of transportation improvement projects.
He has also held various engineering, research and operational positions for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and
Defense Mapping Agency. Mr. Fosburgh received a B.S. in geology from the University of Wisconsin in Green Bay in
1985 and an M.S. in civil engineering from Purdue University in 1989.

Mark A. Harrington – Mark Harrington joined Trimble in January 2004 as a vice president, primarily responsible for
strategy and business development. In October 2007 his responsibilities were expanded to include a number of
divisions, including survey and mapping and geographical information systems, as well as the responsibility for a
number of corporate functions and geographical regions. Prior to joining Trimble, Mr. Harrington served as vice
president of finance at Finisar Corporation and chief financial officer for Cielo Communications, Inc., a photonics
components manufacturer, from February 1998 to September 2002, and Vixel Corporation, a photonics manufacturer,
from April 2003 to December 2003. His experience also includes 11 years at Spectra-Physics where he served in a
variety of roles including vice president of finance for Spectra-Physics Lasers, Inc. and vice president of finance for
Spectra-Physics Analytical, Inc. Mr. Harrington began his career at Varian Associates, Inc. where he held a variety of
management and individual positions in finance, operations and IT. Mr. Harrington received his B.S. in Business
Administration from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Jürgen Kliem – Jürgen Kliem was appointed vice president of strategy and business development in October 2008. From
2002 to 2008, Mr. Kliem served as general manager of Trimble’s Survey Division. Mr. Kliem joined Trimble in July
2000 as part of the Spectra Precision acquisition. From 2000 to 2002, he was responsible for the Engineering and
Construction segment’s European operations. Prior to Spectra Precision, Mr. Kliem held various leadership roles at
Geotronics, a company acquired by Spectra Precision, directing the European sales and marketing activities. Before
joining Geotronics, Mr. Kliem worked in a privately-held surveying firm addressing cadastral, construction, plant and
engineering projects. Mr. Kliem received a Diplom Ingenieur degree from the University of Essen, Germany in 1982.

James A. Kirkland – James A. Kirkland joined Trimble as vice president and general counsel in July 2008. Prior to
joining Trimble, he worked for SpinVox Ltd. from October 2007 to January 2008 as Senior Vice President, Corporate
Development. From October 2003 to September 2007, he served as general counsel and executive vice president,
strategic development at Covad Communications. Mr. Kirkland also served as senior vice president of spectrum
development and general counsel at Clearwire Technologies, Inc. from March 2001 to October 2003. Mr. Kirkland
began his career in 1984 as an associate at Mintz Levin and in 1992 he was promoted to partner. Mr. Kirkland received
his BA from Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. in 1981 and his J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1984.

Julie Shepard – Julie Shepard joined Trimble in December of 2006 as vice president of finance, and was appointed
principal accounting officer in May 2007. Ms. Shepard brings with her over 20 years of experience in a broad range of
finance roles. She is responsible for Trimble's worldwide finance operations including financial planning, accounting,
and external reporting. Prior to joining Trimble, Ms. Shepard served as vice president of finance and corporate
controller at Quantum Corporation, from 2005 to 2006, and prior to that, from 2004 to 2005, as an independent
consultant to Quantum Corporation. She was vice president of finance at Nishan Systems from 2000 to 2003. Ms.
Shepard began her career at Price Waterhouse and is a Certified Public Accountant. She received a B.S from California
State University where she majored in Accounting.

Dennis L. Workman – Dennis Workman has served as vice president of various business divisions, currently including
Component Technologies and Applanix since September 1999. He was appointed Trimble’s chief technical officer in
March 2006. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Workman was senior director and chief technical officer of the newly formed
Mobile and Timing Technologies business group, also serving as general manager of Trimble's Automotive and Timing
group. In 1997, he was director of engineering for Software & Component Technologies. Mr. Workman joined Trimble
in 1995 as director of the newly created Timing vertical market. Prior to Trimble, Mr. Workman held various senior-
level technical positions at Datum Inc. During his nine year tenure at Datum, he held the position of CTO. Mr.
Workman received a B.S. in mathematics and physics from St. Mary’s College in 1967.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

You should carefully consider the following risk factors, in addition to the other information contained in this Form 10-K
and in any other documents to which we refer you in this Form 10-K, before purchasing our securities. The risks and
uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face.

Current Economic Conditions and the Global Financial Crisis May Have an Impact on Our Business and Financial
Condition in Ways that We Currently Cannot Predict.

The Company’s operations and performance depend on worldwide economic conditions and their impact on levels of
business spending, which have deteriorated significantly in many countries and regions and may remain depressed for
the foreseeable future. Uncertainties in the financial and credit markets have caused our customers to postpone
purchases, and continued uncertainties may reduce future sales of our products and services. Continued adverse
economic conditions are likely to depress tax revenue of federal, state and local government entities, which are
significant purchasers of the Company’s products. Protectionist trade measures that may be adopted in response to the
economic downturn could reduce demand for our products and services overseas. With the exception of our Mobile
Solutions and Advanced Devices segments, our products are generally sold through a dealer channel, and our dealers
depend on the availability of credit to finance purchases of our products for their inventory.

Customer collections are our primary source of cash. While we believe we have a strong customer base and have
experienced strong collections in the past, if the current market conditions continue to deteriorate we may experience
increased collection times or greater write-offs, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow. In addition,
the Company's results may be adversely affected if the Company is unable to market, manufacture and ship new
products. Any write-off of goodwill could also negatively impact our financial results. Finally, our ability to access the
capital markets may be restricted at a time when we would like, or need, to do so, which could have an impact on our
flexibility to pursue additional expansion opportunities and maintain our desired level of revenue growth in the future.
These and other economic factors could have a material adverse effect on demand for the Company’s products and
services and on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.

Our Inability to Accurately Predict Orders and Shipments May Subject Our Results of Operations to Significant
Fluctuations From Quarter to Quarter

We have not been able in the past to consistently predict when our customers will place orders and request shipments so
that we cannot always accurately plan our manufacturing requirements. As a result, if orders and shipments differ from
what we predict, we may incur additional expense and build excess inventory, which may require additional reserves and
allowances. Accordingly, we have limited visibility into future changes in demand and our results of operations may be
subject to significant fluctuations from quarter to quarter.

Our Operating Results in Each Quarter May Be Affected by Special Conditions, such as Seasonality, Late Quarter
Purchases, Weather, and Other Potential Issues

Due in part to the buying patterns of our customers, a significant portion of our quarterly revenue occurs from orders
received and immediately shipped to customers in the last few weeks and days of each quarter, although our operating
expense tends to remain fairly predictable. Engineering and construction purchases tend to occur in early spring, and
governmental agencies tend to utilize funds available at the end of the government’s fiscal year for additional purchases
at the end of our third fiscal quarter in September of each year. Concentrations of orders sometimes also occur at the end
of our other two fiscal quarters. Additionally, a majority of our sales force earns commissions on a quarterly basis which
may cause concentrations of orders at the end of any fiscal quarter. It could harm our operating results if for any reason
expected sales are deferred, orders are not received, or shipments are delayed a few days at the end of a quarter.

We Are Dependent on a Specific Manufacturer and Assembler for Many of Our Products and on Specific Suppliers of
Critical Parts for Our Products

We are substantially dependent upon Flextronics International Limited as our preferred manufacturing partner for many
of our GPS products. Under the agreement, we provide to Flextronics a twelve-month product forecast and place
purchase orders with Flextronics at least thirty calendar days in advance of the scheduled delivery of products to our
customers depending on production lead time. Although purchase orders placed with Flextronics are cancelable, the
terms of the agreement would require us to purchase from Flextronics all inventory not returnable or usable by other
Flextronics customers. Accordingly, if we inaccurately forecast demand for our products, we may be unable to obtain
adequate manufacturing capacity from Flextronics to meet customers’ delivery requirements or we may accumulate
excess inventories, if such inventories are not usable by other Flextronics customers. Our current contract with
Flextronics continues in effect until either party gives the other ninety days written notice.

In addition, we rely on specific suppliers for a number of our critical components. We have experienced shortages of
components in the past. Our current reliance on specific or a limited group of suppliers involves several risks, including a
potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components, reduced control over pricing, and economic
conditions which may adversely impact the viability of our suppliers. Any inability to obtain adequate deliveries or any
other circumstance that would require us to seek alternative sources of supply or to manufacture such components
internally could significantly delay our ability to ship our products, which could damage relationships with current and
prospective customers and could harm our reputation and brand as well as our operating results.

Our Annual and Quarterly Performance May Fluctuate Which Could Negatively Impact Our Operations and Our Stock
Price

Our operating results have fluctuated and can be expected to continue to fluctuate in the future on a quarterly and annual
basis as a result of a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Results in any period could be affected
by:

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

changes in market demand,
competitive market conditions,
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates,
the cost and availability of components,
the mix of our customer base and sales channels,
the mix of products sold,
our ability to expand our sales and marketing organization effectively,
our ability to attract and retain key technical and managerial employees, and
general global economic conditions.

In addition, demand for our products in any quarter or year may vary due to the seasonal buying patterns of our
customers in the agricultural and engineering and construction industries. The price of our common stock could decline
substantially in the event such fluctuations result in our financial performance being below the expectations of public
market analysts and investors, which are based primarily on historical models that are not necessarily accurate
representations of the future.

Our Gross Margin Is Subject to Fluctuation

Our gross margin is affected by a number of factors, including product mix, product pricing, cost of components, foreign
currency exchange rates, and manufacturing costs. For example, sales of Nikon-branded products generally have lower
gross margin as compared to our GPS survey products. Absent other factors, a shift in sales towards Nikon-branded
products would lead to a reduction in our overall gross margin. A decline in gross margin could harm our results of
operations and financial condition.

We Are Dependent on New Products and if We are Unable to Successfully Introduce Them Into The Market Our
Customer Base May Decline or Fail to Grow as Anticipated

Our future revenue stream depends to a large degree on our ability to bring new products to market on a timely basis. We
must continue to make significant investments in research and development in order to continue to develop new
products, enhance existing products, and achieve market acceptance of such products. We may incur problems in the
future in innovating and introducing new products. Our development stage products may not be successfully completed
or, if developed, may not achieve significant customer acceptance. If we were unable to successfully define, develop and
introduce competitive new products, and enhance existing products, our future results of operations would be adversely
affected. Development and manufacturing schedules for technology products are difficult to predict, and we might not
achieve timely initial customer shipments of new products. The timely availability of these products in volume and their
acceptance by customers are important to our future success. If we are unable to introduce new products, if other
companies develop similar technology products, or if we do not develop compelling new products, our number of
customers may not grow as anticipated, or may decline, which could harm our operating results.

We Are Dependent on Proprietary Technology, which Could Result in Litigation that Could Divert Significant Valuable
Resources

Our future success and competitive position is dependent upon our proprietary technology, and we rely on patent, trade
secret, trademark, and copyright law to protect our intellectual property. The patents owned or licensed by us may be
invalidated, circumvented, and challenged. The rights granted under these patents may not provide competitive
advantages to us. Any of our pending or future patent applications may not be issued within the scope of the claims
sought by us, if at all.

Others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology, duplicate our technology or design
around the patents owned by us. In addition, effective copyright, patent, and trade secret protection may be unavailable,
limited or not applied for in certain countries. The steps taken by us to protect our technology might not prevent the
misappropriation of such technology.

The value of our products relies substantially on our technical innovation in fields in which there are many current patent
filings. We recognize that as new patents are issued or are brought to our attention by the holders of such patents, it may
be necessary for us to withdraw products from the market, take a license from such patent holders, or redesign our
products. We do not believe any of our products currently infringe patents or other proprietary rights of third parties, but
we cannot be certain they do not do so. In addition, the legal costs and engineering time required to safeguard intellectual
property or to defend against litigation could become a significant expense of operations. Any such litigation could
require us to incur substantial costs and divert significant valuable resources, including the efforts of our technical and
management personnel, which harm our results of operations and financial condition.

Investing in and Integrating New Acquisitions Could be Costly and May Place a Significant Strain on Our Management
Systems and Resources Which Could Negatively Impact Our Operating Results

We have recently acquired a number of companies, and intend to continue to acquire other companies. Acquisitions of
companies entail numerous risks, including:

•

•
•
•
•

•

potential inability to successfully integrate acquired operations and products or to realize cost savings or other
anticipated benefits from integration;
loss of key employees of acquired operations;
the difficulty of assimilating geographically dispersed operations and personnel of the acquired companies;
the potential disruption of our ongoing business;
unanticipated expense related to acquisitions; including significant transactions costs which under the new
accounting rules, are required to be expensed rather than capitalized;
the correct assessment of the relative percentages of in-process research and development expense that can be
immediately written off as compared to the amount which must be amortized over the appropriate life of the
asset;
the impairment of relationships with employees and customers of either an acquired company or our own
business; and
the potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired business.

As a result of such acquisitions, we have significant assets that include goodwill and other purchased intangibles. The
testing of this goodwill and intangibles for impairment under established accounting guidelines requires significant use
of judgment and assumptions. Changes in business conditions could require adjustments to the valuation of these assets.
In addition, losses incurred by a company in which we have an investment may have a direct impact on our financial
statements or could result in our having to write-down the value of such investment. Any such problems in integration or
adjustments to the value of the assets acquired could harm our growth strategy, and could be costly and place a
significant strain on our management systems and resources.

Our Products May Contain Errors or Defects, which Could Result in Damage to Our Reputation, Lost Revenue,
Diverted Development Resources and Increased Service Costs, Warranty Claims, and Litigation

We warrant that our products will be free of defect for various periods of time, depending on the product. In addition,
certain of our contracts include epidemic failure clauses. If invoked, these clauses may entitle the customer to return or
obtain credits for products and inventory, or to cancel outstanding purchase orders even if the products themselves are not
defective.

We must develop our products quickly to keep pace with the rapidly changing market, and we have a history of
frequently introducing new products. Products and services as sophisticated as ours could contain undetected errors or
defects, especially when first introduced or when new models or versions are released. In general, our products may not
be free from errors or defects after commercial shipments have begun, which could result in damage to our reputation,
lost revenue, diverted development resources, increased customer service and support costs and warranty claims and
litigation.

We Are Dependent on the Availability of Allocated Bands within the Radio Frequency Spectrum

Our GNSS technology is dependent on the use of satellite signals from space and on terrestrial communication
bands. International allocations of radio frequency are made by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), a
specialized technical agency of the United Nations. These allocations are further governed by radio regulations that have
treaty status and which may be subject to modification every two to three years by the World Radio Communication
Conference. Each country also has regulatory authority on how each band is used.

Any ITU or local reallocation of radio frequency bands, including frequency band segmentation or sharing of spectrum,
may materially and adversely affect the utility and reliability of our products. Many of our products use other radio
frequency bands, together with the GNSS signal, to provide enhanced GNSS capabilities, such as real-time kinematics
precision. The continuing availability of these non-GNSS radio frequencies is essential to provide enhanced GNSS
products to our precision survey, agriculture and construction machine controls markets. Any regulatory changes in
spectrum allocation or in allowable operating conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, and financial condition.

We have certain products, such as GPS RTK systems, and surveying and mapping systems that use integrated radio
communication technology requiring access to available radio frequencies allocated to local government. Some bands
are experiencing congestion. In the U.S., the FCC announced that it will require migration of radio technology from
wideband to narrowband operations in these bands. The rules require migration of users to narrowband channels by
2011. In the meantime, congestion could cause FCC coordinators to restrict or refuse licenses. An inability to obtain
access to these radio frequencies by end users could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations,
and financial condition.

Many of Our Products Rely on GNSS technology, the GPS, and other Satellite Systems, Which May Become Inoperable
and Result in Lost Revenue

GNSS technology, GPS satellites and their ground support systems are complex electronic systems subject to electronic
and mechanical failures and possible sabotage. Many of the GPS satellites currently in orbit were originally designed to
have lives of 7.5 years and are subject to damage by the hostile space environment in which they operate. However, of
the current deployment of 30 satellites in place, some have already been in operation for more than 12 years. To repair
damaged or malfunctioning satellites is currently not economically feasible. If a significant number of satellites were to
become inoperable, there could be a substantial delay before they are replaced with new satellites. A reduction in the
number of operating satellites may impair the current utility of the GPS system and the growth of current and additional
market opportunities.

As the only complete GNSS currently in operation, we are dependent on continued operation of GPS. GPS is operated
by the U. S. Government, which is committed to maintenance and improvement of GPS; however if the policy were to
change, and GPS were no longer supported by the U. S. Government, or if user fees were imposed, it could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Many of our products also use signals from systems that augment GPS, such as the Wide Area Augmentation System
(WAAS) and National Differential GPS System (NDGPS). Many of these augmentation systems are operated by the
federal government and rely on continued funding and maintenance of these systems. In addition, some of our products
also use satellite signals from the Russian GLONASS System. Any curtailment of the operating capability of these
systems could result in decreased user capability thereby impacting our markets.

The European community has begun development of an independent radio navigation satellite system, known as Galileo.
We have access to the preliminary signal design, which is subject to change and which requires a commercial license
from Galileo authorities. Although an operational Galileo system is several years away, if we are unable to develop a

timely commercial product, or obtain a timely commercial license, it could result in lost revenue which could harm our
results of operations and financial condition.

Our Business is Subject to Disruptions and Uncertainties Caused by War or Terrorism

Acts of war or acts of terrorism, especially any directed at the GPS signals, could have a material adverse impact on our
business, operating results, and financial condition. The threat of terrorism and war and heightened security and military
response to this threat, or any future acts of terrorism, may invoke a redeployment of the satellites used in GPS or
interruptions of the system. To the extent that such interruptions result in delays or cancellations of orders, or the
manufacture or shipment of our products, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations,
and financial condition.

We Are Exposed to Fluctuations in Currency Exchange Rates and Although We Hedge Against These Risks, Our
Attempts to Hedge Could be Unsuccessful and Expose Us to Losses

A significant portion of our business is conducted outside the U.S., and as such, we face exposure to movements in non-
U.S. currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and could have a
material adverse impact on our financial results and cash flows. Fluctuation in currency impacts our operating results.

Currently, we hedge only those currency exposures associated with certain assets and liabilities denominated in non-
functional currencies. The hedging activities undertaken by us are intended to offset the impact of currency fluctuations
on certain non-functional currency assets and liabilities. Our attempts to hedge against these risks could be unsuccessful
and expose us to losses.

Our Debt Could Adversely Affect Our Cash Flow and Prevent Us from Fulfilling Our Financial Obligations

We have an existing unsecured revolving credit agreement, under which we have an ability to borrow an aggregate
amount of up to $300 million. As of January 2, 2009, $151.0 million was outstanding under this line of credit. Debt
incurred under this agreement could have important consequences, such as:

•

•
•

•

requiring us to dedicate a portion of our cash flow from operations and other capital resources to debt service,
thereby reducing our ability to fund working capital, capital expenditures, and other cash requirements;
increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes and opportunities in, our industry, which may
place us at a competitive disadvantage; and
limiting our ability to incur additional debt on acceptable terms, if at all.

Additionally, if we were to default under our amended credit agreement and were unable to obtain a waiver for such a
default, interest on the obligations would accrue at an increased rate and the lenders could accelerate our
obligations under the amended credit agreement, however that acceleration will be automatic in the case of bankruptcy
and insolvency events of default. Additionally, our subsidiaries that have guaranteed the amended credit agreement
could be required to pay the full amount of our obligations under the amended credit agreement. Any such action on the
part of the lenders against us could harm our financial condition.

We May Not Be Able to Enter Into or Maintain Important Alliances

We believe that in certain business opportunities our success will depend on our ability to form and maintain alliances
with industry participants, such as Caterpillar, Nikon, and CNH Global. Our failure to form and maintain such alliances,
or the pre-emption of such alliances by actions of competitors or us, will adversely affect our ability to penetrate
emerging markets. If we experience problems from current or future alliances it could harm our operating results and we
may not be able to realize value from any such strategic alliances.

We Face Competition in Our Markets Which Could Decrease Our Revenue and Growth Rates or Impair Our Operating
Results and Financial Condition

Our markets are highly competitive and we expect that both direct and indirect competition will increase in the future.
Our overall competitive position depends on a number of factors including the price, quality and performance of our

products, the level of customer service, the development of new technology and our ability to participate in emerging
markets. Within each of our markets, we encounter direct competition from other GPS, optical and laser suppliers and
competition may intensify from various larger U.S. and non-U.S. competitors and new market entrants, particularly from
emerging markets such as China and India. The competition in the future may, in some cases, result in price reductions,
reduced margins or loss of market share, any of which could decrease our revenue and growth rates or impair our
operating results and financial condition. We believe that our ability to compete successfully in the future against
existing and additional competitors will depend largely on our ability to execute our strategy to provide systems and
products with significantly differentiated features compared to currently available products. We may not be able to
implement this strategy successfully, and our products may not be competitive with other technologies or products that
may be developed by our competitors, many of whom have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing,
marketing, sales and other resources than we do.

We Are Subject to the Impact of Governmental and Other Similar Certifications and Failure to Obtain the Requisite
Certifications Could Harm Our Operating Results

We market certain products that are subject to governmental and similar certifications before they can be sold. For
example, CE certification for radiated emissions is required for most GPS receiver and data communications products
sold in the European community. An inability to obtain such certifications in a timely manner could have an adverse
effect on our operating results. Also, some of our products that use integrated radio communication technology require
product type certification and some products require an end user to obtain licensing from the FCC for frequency-band
usage. These are secondary licenses that are subject to certain restrictions. An inability or delay in obtaining such
certifications or changes to the rules by the FCC could adversely affect our ability to bring our products to market which
could harm our customer relationships and therefore, our operating results. Any failure to obtain the requisite
certifications could also harm our operating results.

The Volatility of Our Stock Price Could Adversely Affect Your Investment in Our Common Stock

The market price of our common stock has been, and may continue to be, highly volatile. During fiscal 2008, our stock
price ranged from $14.43 to $41.42, on a post-split basis. We believe that a variety of factors could cause the price of
our common stock to fluctuate, perhaps substantially, including:

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

announcements and rumors of developments related to our business or the industry in which we compete;
quarterly fluctuations in our actual or anticipated operating results and order levels;
general conditions in the worldwide economy;
acquisition announcements;
new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors;
developments in patents or other intellectual property rights and litigation;
developments in our relationships with our customers and suppliers; and
any significant acts of terrorism.

In addition, in recent years the stock market in general and the markets for shares of "high-tech" companies in particular,
have experienced extreme price fluctuations which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of affected
companies. Any such fluctuations in the future could adversely affect the market price of our common stock, and the
market price of our common stock may decline.

Changes in Our Effective Tax Rate May Reduce Our Net Income in Future Periods

A number of factors may increase our future effective tax rates, including:

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed;
the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities;
changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities;
increases in expense not deductible for tax purposes, including write-offs of acquired in-process R&D and
impairments of goodwill in connection with acquisitions;
changes in available tax credits;
changes in share-based compensation;
changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws, and changes in generally accepted accounting principles;

•
•

the repatriation of non-U.S. earnings for which we have not previously provided for U.S. taxes; and
challenges to the transfer pricing policies related to our global supply chain management structure.

The Company is currently in various stages of multiple year examinations by federal, state, and foreign taxing
authorities, including an audit of its 2005 through 2007 tax years by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). If the IRS
or the taxing authorities of any other jurisdiction were to successfully challenge a material tax position, we could become
subject to higher taxes and our earnings would be adversely affected. In addition, proposals for changes in U.S. tax laws
that may be considered or adopted in the future could subject the Company to higher taxes or result in changes to tax law
provisions that currently provide favorable tax treatment.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None

Item 2. Properties.

The following table sets forth the significant real property that we own or lease as of February 21, 2009:

Location

Segment(s) served

Size in Sq. Feet

Commitment

Sunnyvale, California

All

Huber Heights (Dayton),
Ohio

Westminster, Colorado

Engineering & Construction
Field Solutions
Mobile Solutions
Engineering & Construction,
Field Solutions

Corvallis, Oregon

Engineering & Construction

Richmond Hill, Canada
Danderyd, Sweden

Christchurch, New Zealand

Advanced Devices
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction,
Mobile Solutions, Field
Solutions

Fremont, California (@Road) Mobile Solutions

160,000

150,000
57,200
55,200

86,000

20,000
38,000
50,200
93,900

65,000

102,544

Leased, expiring in 2012
3 buildings
Owned, no encumbrances
Leased, expiring in 2011
Leased, expiring in 2009

Leased, expiring in 2013

Owned, no encumbrances
Leased, expiring in 2009
Leased, expiring in 2010
Leased, expiring in 2010

Leased, expiring in 2010
2 buildings

Chennai, India
(@Road)

Mobile Solutions

37,910

Leased, expiring in 2012

In addition, we lease a number of smaller offices around the world primarily for sales and manufacturing functions. For
financial information regarding obligations under leases, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.

* We believe that our facilities are adequate to support current and near-term operations.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation arising out of the ordinary course of its business. There are no
known claims or pending litigation expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and
financial condition.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2008.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities.

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ under the symbol "TRMB." The table below sets forth, during the periods
indicated, the high and low per share sale prices for our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ.

2008
Sales Price

2007
Sales Price

Quarter Ended
First quarter ............... $
Second quarter ..........
Third quarter .............
Fourth quarter ............

High

Low

High

Low

30.97 $
41.42
36.34
28.04

21.47 $
26.09
27.66
14.43

57.41 $
32.65
41.33
43.15

25.47
26.83
32.24
30.40

Stock Repurchase Program

In January 2008, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program (“2008 Stock Repurchase Program”),
authorizing us to repurchase up to $250 million of Trimble’s common stock under this program. We repurchased
approximately 4,243,000 shares of common stock in open market purchases at an average price of $29.67 per share in
2008. The total purchase price of $125.9 million was reflected as a decrease to common stock based on the average
stated value per share with the remainder to retained earnings. Common stock repurchases under the program were
recorded based upon the trade date for accounting purposes. All common shares repurchased under this program have
been retired. As of January 2, 2009, the 2008 Stock Repurchase Program had remaining authorized funds of $124.1
million. The timing and actual number of future shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price,
regulatory requirements, capital availability, and other market conditions. The program does not require the purchase of
any minimum number of shares and may be suspended or discontinued at any time without public notice.

The following table provides information relating to our purchases of equity securities for the fourth quarter of fiscal
2008:

Total Number
of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Program

Maximum
Dollar
Value of Shares
that
May Yet Be
Purchased
Under
the Program

Total Number of
Shares
Purchased

Average
Price Paid
per Share

September 27, 2008 – October 31, 2008 .....................
October 31, 2008 – November 28, 2008 .....................
November 29, 2008 – January 2, 2009 .......................
Total Activities ...........................................................

-
357,617 $
178,759
536,376 $

-
19.35
17.45
18.71

- $ 134,149,431
357,617 127,231,086
178,759 124,111,572
536,376

As of February 27, 2009, there were approximately 961 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock during any period for which financial
information is provided in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. At this time, we intend to retain future earnings, if any, to
fund the development and growth of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock
in the foreseeable future.

Under the existing terms of our credit facility, we are allowed to pay dividends and repurchase shares of our common
stock without limitation so long as no default or unmatured default then existed, the leverage ratio for the two most
recently completed periods was less than 2.00:1.00 and after giving pro forma effect to such dividend or share
repurchase, the leverage ratio will be less than 2.00:1.00. Should the leverage ratio be equal to or greater than 2.00:1.00

without exceeding a leverage ratio of 3.00:1.00, we can pay dividends and repurchase shares of our common stock in any
twelve (12) month period, in an aggregate amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of net income (plus, to the extent
deducted in determining net income for such period, non-cash expenses in respect of stock options) for the previous
twelve-month period, plus an additional $50 million over the term of the credit facility subject to pro forma compliance
with our fixed charge coverage ratio covenant. Otherwise, dividends and share repurchases are restricted by our Credit
Agreement.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes
appearing elsewhere in this annual report. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results. In particular,
because the results of operations and financial condition related to our acquisitions are included in our Consolidated
Statements of Income and Consolidated Balance Sheets data commencing on those respective acquisition dates,
comparisons of our results of operations and financial condition for periods prior to and subsequent to those acquisitions
are not indicative of future results. In February 2007 we acquired @Road, Inc. Please refer to Note 4 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for more information.

As of And For the Fiscal Years Ended

(Dollar in thousands, except per share data)

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

December 29,
2006

December 30,
2005

December 31,
2004

Revenue ............................................................. $ 1,329,234 $ 1,222,270 $ 940,150 $ 774,913 $ 668,808
Gross margin ...................................................... $ 649,136 $ 612,905 $ 461,081 $ 389,805 $ 324,810
48.6%
Gross margin percentage ...................................
49.0%
48.8%
67,680
Income from continuing operations ................... $ 141,472 $ 117,374 $ 103,658 $
Net income ......................................................... $ 141,472 $ 117,374 $ 103,658 $
67,680
Per common share (1): .......................................
Net income (1) ...................................................
- Basic ............................................................ $
- Diluted ......................................................... $
Shares used in calculating basic earnings per

50.3%
84,855 $
84,855 $

0.94 $
0.89 $

1.17 $
1.14 $

0.98 $
0.94 $

0.80 $
0.75 $

0.66
0.62

50.1%

share (1) ......................................................

120,714

119,280

110,044 106,432

102,326

Shares used in calculating diluted earnings

per share (1) ................................................
Cash dividends per share ................................... $

124,235
- $

124,410
- $

116,072 113,638
- $

- $

109,896
-

Total assets ........................................................ $ 1,635,016 $ 1,539,359 $ 983,477 $ 749,265 $ 657,975
Non-current portion of long term debt and other

non-current liabilities ..................................... $ 213,017 $ 116,692 $

28,000 $

19,474 $

38,226

(1) 2-for-1 Stock Split - On January 17, 2007, Trimble’s board of directors approved a 2-for-1 split of all
outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock, payable February 22, 2007 to stockholders of record on
February 8, 2007. All shares and per share information presented has been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a
retroactive basis for all periods presented.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes.
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual
results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and those listed under "Risks
Factors." We have attempted to identify forward-looking statements in this report by placing an asterisk (*) before
paragraphs containing such material.

EXECUTIVE LEVEL OVERVIEW

Trimble’s focus is on combining positioning technology with wireless communication and application capabilities to
create system-level solutions that enhance productivity and accuracy for our customers. The majority of our markets are
end-user markets, including engineering and construction firms, governmental organizations, public safety workers,
farmers and companies who must manage fleets of mobile workers and assets. In our Advanced Devices segment, we
also provide components to original equipment manufacturers to incorporate into their products. In the end user markets,
we provide a system that includes a hardware platform that may contain software and customer support. Some examples
of our solutions include products that automate and simplify the process of surveying land, products that automate the
utilization of equipment such as tractors and bulldozers, products that enable a company to manage its mobile workforce
and assets, and products that allow municipalities to manage their fixed assets. In addition, we also provide software
applications on a stand-alone basis. For example, we provide software for project management on construction sites.

Solutions targeted at the end-user make up a significant majority of our revenue. To create compelling products, we must
attain an understanding of the end users’ needs and work flow, and how location-based technology can enable that end
user to work faster, more efficiently, and more accurately. We use this knowledge to create highly innovative products
that change the way work is done by the end-user. With the exception of our Mobile Solutions and Advanced Devices
segments, our products are generally sold through a dealer channel, and it is crucial that we maintain a proficient global,
third-party distribution channel.

We continued to execute our strategy with a series of actions that can be summarized in four categories.

Reinforcing our position in existing markets

* We believe these markets provide us with additional, substantial potential for substituting our technology for
traditional methods. We are continuing to develop new products and to strengthen our distribution channels in order to
expand our market opportunity. In our Field Solutions Segment, we introduced the AgGPS EZ-Guide 250 Lightbar
Guidance System, GPS Pathfinder ProXRT Receiver, Trimble GeoExplorer 2008 Series and the new Juno™ Series. We
announced that the City of Joliet, Illinois Public Utilities Department and the Baton Rouge Water Company in Louisiana
selected Trimble’s Fieldport software to enhance utility field operations. In our Engineering and Construction segment,
we introduced the Trimble MEP layout solution, Trimble Coastal Center™ Software, and Trimble NetR8™ GNSS
Reference Receiver. We also introduced further enhancements to our complete surveying portfolio as part of its
Connected Site™ solutions: new models of the Trimble S8 Total Station with options for monitoring and tunneling
applications; a new version of Trimble Business Center; a scalable Trimble VX Spatial Station; and improved field to
office solutions for German surveyors. In our Mobile Solutions segment, we announced that Carrier Corporation is
rolling out Trimble's Mobile Resource Management (MRM) solution within its fleet. All of these products strengthened
our competitive position and created new value for the user.

Extending our position in existing markets through new product categories

* We are utilizing the strength of the Trimble brand in our markets to expand our revenue by bringing new products to
existing users. In our Field Solutions segment, we introduced Agriculture Manager™ Asset Management System AgGPS
EZ-Office™ Software. In our Engineering and Construction segment, we introduced new products, such as a new sensor
for the Trimble CCS900 Compaction Control System that provides real-time material density information to earthworks
operators. We were also chosen to supply Trimble VRS™ technology to establish a nationwide GNSS infrastructure
network for Turkey called CORS-TR (Continuous Operating Reference Station-Turkey or TUSAGA AKTIF) and the
Republic of Croatia called the CROatian POsitioning System (CROPOS). We launched Trimble VRS Now™ Service in
Madrid, Spain and in the state of Florida to provide surveyors, civil engineers and geospatial professionals in the area
with instant access to real-time kinematic (RTK) GNSS corrections without the need for a base station. These are all
examples of bringing new products to existing markets.

Bringing existing technology to new markets

* We continue to reinforce our position in existing markets and position ourselves in newer markets that will serve as
important sources of future growth. Our efforts in Africa, China, India, the Middle-East and Russia reflected improving
financial results. We announced a GPS software technology licensing agreement with Marvell, a leader in the
development of storage, communications and consumer silicon. The licensing agreement will enable Marvell to provide
customers with comprehensive GPS solutions based on innovative architectures that are tailored for high performance
and low overall system power consumption.

Entering new market segments

* During 2008 we acquired companies, technologies or introduced new product categories that have allowed us to enter
new market segments. In our Engineering and Construction segment, we acquired two accessory companies, Crain and
SECO, whose products complement our existing construction product offerings. Additionally, we acquired three
companies, Géo-3D, RolleiMetric and Toposys, which through new product offerings, expand the emerging Geospatial
markets. In our Field Solutions segment, we acquired TruCount and Rawson Control Systems, which through new
products, expand our agricultural market segment. We also acquired the FastMap and GeoSite software assets from
Korec, which expand our GIS solutions.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The
preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires us to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts
reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We consider the accounting polices described below to be our critical accounting polices. These critical accounting
policies are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions, and estimates used in the preparation of the
Consolidated Financial Statements, and actual results could differ materially from the amounts reported based on
these policies.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, shipment has occurred, the fee is
fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In instances where final acceptance of the product is
specified by the customer or is uncertain, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met.

Contracts and/or customer purchase orders are used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents
and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. We assess whether the fee is fixed or
determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund
or adjustment. We assess collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit
checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history.

Revenue for orders is not recognized until the product is shipped and title has transferred to the buyer. We bear all costs
and risks of loss or damage to the goods up to that point. Our shipment terms for U.S. orders and international orders
fulfilled from our European distribution center typically provide that title passes to the buyer upon delivery of the goods
to the carrier named by the buyer at the named place or point. If no precise point is indicated by the buyer, we may
choose within the place or range stipulated where the carrier will take the goods into carrier’s charge. Other shipment
terms may provide that title passes to the buyer upon delivery of the goods to the buyer. Shipping and handling costs are
included in the cost of goods sold.

Revenue to distributors and resellers is recognized upon shipment, assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition
have been met. Distributors and resellers do not have a right of return.

Revenue from purchased extended warranty and support agreements is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of
the warranty/support period.

We present revenue net of sales taxes and any similar assessments.

We apply Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” to products where the embedded
software is more than incidental to the functionality of the hardware. This determination requires significant judgment
including a consideration of factors such as marketing, research and development efforts and any post-customer contract
support (PCS) relating to the embedded software.

Our software arrangements generally consist of a perpetual license fee and PCS. We have established vendor-specific
objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value for our PCS contracts based on renewal rates. The remaining value of the
software arrangement is allocated to the license fee using the residual method. License revenue is primarily recognized

when the software has been delivered and there are no remaining obligations. Revenue from PCS is recognized ratably
over the term of the PCS agreement.

We apply EITF Issue 00-3, "Application of AICPA Statement of Position 97-2 to Arrangements That Include the Right
to Use Software Stored on Another Entity's Hardware," for hosted arrangements which the customer does not have the
contractual right to take possession of the software at any time during the hosting period without incurring a significant
penalty and it is not feasible for the customer to run the software either on its own hardware or on a third-party’s
hardware. Subscription revenue related to our hosted arrangements is recognized ratably over the contract period.
Upfront fees for our hosted solution primarily consist of amounts for the in-vehicle enabling hardware device and
peripherals, if any. For upfront fees relating to proprietary hardware where the firmware is more than incidental to the
functionality of the hardware in accordance with SOP No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” we defer the upfront
fees at installation and recognize them ratably over the minimum service contract period, generally one to five years.
Product costs are also deferred and amortized over such period.

In accordance with EITF Issue 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,” when a non-
software sale involves multiple elements the entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element
based on its relative fair value and recognized when revenue recognition criteria for each element is met.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Sales Returns

Our accounts receivable balance, net of allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns reserve, was $204.3 million as
of January 2, 2009, as compared with $239.9 million as of December 28, 2007. The allowance for doubtful accounts was
$6.0 million and $5.2 million as of January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007, respectively. We evaluate ongoing
collectibility of our trade accounts receivable based on a number of factors such as age of the accounts receivable
balances, credit quality, historical experience, and current economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to
pay. In circumstances where we are aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us, a
specific allowance for bad debts is estimated and recorded which reduces the recognized receivable to the estimated
amount we believe will ultimately be collected. In addition to specific customer identification of potential bad debts, bad
debt charges are recorded based on our recent past loss history and an overall assessment of past due trade accounts
receivable amounts outstanding.

A reserve for sales returns is established based on historical trends in product return rates experienced in the ordinary
course of business. The reserve for sales returns as of January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007 was $1.8 million and $1.7
million, respectively, for estimated future returns that were recorded as a reduction of our accounts receivable and
revenue. If the actual future returns were to deviate from the historical data on which the reserve had been established,
our revenue could be adversely affected.

Inventory Valuation

Our inventories, net balance was $160.9 million as of January 2, 2009 as compared with $143.0 million as of December
28, 2007. Our inventory allowances as of January 2, 2009 were $29.8 million, as compared with $29.6 million as of
December 28, 2007. Our inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost (which approximates actual cost on a first-in,
first-out basis) or market. Adjustments to reduce the cost of inventory to its net realizable value, if required, are made
for estimated excess, obsolescence, or impaired balances. Factors influencing these adjustments include decline in
demand, technological changes, product life cycle and development plans, component cost trends, product pricing,
physical deterioration, and quality issues. If actual factors are less favorable than those projected by us, additional
inventory write-downs may be required.

Income Taxes

Our valuation allowance is attributable to, primarily, acquisition related net operating loss and research and development
credit carryforwards. Management believes that it is more likely than not that we will not realize these deferred tax

assets, and, accordingly, a valuation allowance has been provided for such amounts. When SFAS 141(R), “Business
Combinations”, becomes effective, any valuation allowance adjustment associated with an acquisition that closed prior
to January 3, 2009 (and after the measurement period) will be recorded through income tax expense whereas the current
accounting treatment (under SFAS 141) would require any adjustment to be recognized through the purchase price.

Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible, identifiable intangible assets,
and in-process research and development acquired in a business combination. Intangible assets acquired individually,
with a group of other assets, or in a business combination are recorded at fair value. Identifiable intangible assets are
comprised of distribution channels and distribution rights, patents, licenses, technology, acquired backlog and
trademarks. Identifiable intangible assets are being amortized over the period of estimated benefit using the straight-line
method, reflecting the pattern of economic benefits associated with these assets, and have estimated useful lives ranging
from one to twelve years with a weighted average useful life of 6.5 years. Goodwill is not subject to amortization, but is
subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment, applying a fair-value based test.

Impairment of Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate goodwill, at a minimum, on an annual basis and whenever events and changes in circumstances suggest that
the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The annual goodwill impairment testing is performed in the fourth fiscal
quarter of each year. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment utilizing a two-step process. First, impairment of goodwill is
tested at the reporting unit level by comparing the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair value
of the reporting unit. The fair values of the reporting units are estimated using a discounted cash flow approach. If the
carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second step is performed to measure the amount of
impairment loss, if any. In step two, the implied fair value of goodwill is calculated as the excess of the fair value of a
reporting unit over the fair values assigned to its assets and liabilities. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the
carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill, the difference is recognized as an impairment loss.

Depreciation and amortization of the intangible assets and other long-lived assets is provided using the straight-line
method over their estimated useful lives, reflecting the pattern of economic benefits associated with these assets.
Changes in circumstances such as technological advances, changes to our business model, or changes in the capital
strategy could result in the actual useful lives of intangible assets or other long-lived assets differing from initial
estimates. In those cases where we determine that the useful life of an asset should be revised, the net book value in
excess of the estimated residual value will be expensed and the residual value is depreciated over its revised remaining
useful life. These assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable based on their future cash flows. The estimated future cash flows
are based upon, among other things, assumptions about expected future operating performance and may differ from
actual cash flows. The assets evaluated for impairment are grouped with other assets to the lowest level for which
identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. If the sum of the
projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be
written down to the estimated fair value.

Warranty Costs

The liability for product warranties was $13.3 million as of January 2, 2009, as compared with $10.8 million as of
December 28, 2007. We accrue for warranty costs as part of cost of sales based on associated material product costs,
technical support labor costs, and costs incurred by third parties performing work on our behalf. Our expected future cost
is primarily estimated based upon historical trends in the volume of product returns within the warranty period and the
cost to repair or replace the equipment. The products sold are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from
90 days to three years, and in some instances up to 5.5 years.

While we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the
quality of our component suppliers, our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and
service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Should actual product failure rates, material usage, or
service delivery costs differ from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty accrual and related costs may be
required.

Stock-Based Compensation

Beginning in fiscal 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), “Share-Based
Payment” (SFAS 123(R)), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based
payment awards made to our employees and directors, based on estimated fair values. Stock-based compensation
expense recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Income for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 includes compensation
expense for awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 30, 2005 based on the grant date fair value
estimated using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123 and
compensation expense for awards granted subsequent to December 30, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated
using a binomial valuation model in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). The fair value of rights to purchase
shares under stock participation plans was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

The determination of fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is
affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective
variables. These variables include our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected
employee stock option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rates, and expected dividends. In addition, the binomial
model incorporates actual option-pricing behavior and changes in volatility over the option’s contractual term.

Beginning in fiscal 2006, our expected stock price volatility for stock purchase rights has been based on implied
volatilities of traded options on our stock and our expected stock price volatility for stock options is based on a
combination of our historical stock price volatility for the period commensurate with the expected life of the stock option
and the implied volatility of traded options. The use of implied volatilities was based upon the availability of actively
traded options on our stock with terms similar to our awards and also upon our assessment that implied volatility is more
representative of future stock price trends than historical volatility. However, because the expected life of our stock
options is greater than the terms of our traded options, we used a combination of our historical stock price volatility
commensurate with the expected life of our stock options and implied volatility of traded options.

We estimated the expected life of the awards based on an analysis of our historical experience of employee exercise and
post-vesting termination behavior considered in relation to the contractual life of the options and purchase rights. The
risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the expected term of the awards.

We do not currently pay cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable
future. Accordingly, our expected dividend yield is zero.

Because stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for fiscal 2008,
2007 and 2006 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS
123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on historical experience.

If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the application of SFAS 123(R) in future periods, the
compensation expense that we record under SFAS 123(R) may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the
current period. In addition, valuation models, including the Black-Scholes and binomial models, may not provide
reliable measures of the fair values of our stock-based compensation. Consequently, there is a risk that our estimates of
the fair values of our stock-based compensation awards on the grant dates may bear little resemblance to the actual
values realized upon the exercise, expiration, early termination, or forfeiture of those stock-based payments in the
future. Certain stock-based payments, such as employee stock options, may expire worthless or otherwise result in zero
intrinsic value as compared to the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported in our financial
statements. Alternatively, value may be realized from these instruments that are significantly higher than the fair values
originally estimated on the grant date and reported in our financial statements.

See Note 2 and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

RECENT BUSINESS DEVELOPMENTS

The following companies and joint ventures were acquired or formed during fiscal 2008 and are combined in our results
of operations since the date of acquisition or formation:

Rawson Control Systems

FastMap and GeoSite

Callidus Precision Systems

Toposys

TruCount

RolleiMetric

VirtualSite Solutions

SECO

Géo-3D

Crain Enterprises

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

The following table is a summary of revenue, gross margin and operating income for the periods indicated and should be
read in conjunction with the narrative descriptions below.

Fiscal Years Ended

(Dollars in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,

December 29,

2007

2006

Total consolidated revenue............................... $ 1,329,234
649,136
Gross margin .................................................... $
Gross margin %................................................
Total consolidated operating income................ $
Operating income %.........................................

$
$
48.8%
$
14.0%

185,460

1,222,270
612,905

$
$

50.1%

178,267

14.6%

940,150
461,081
49.0%
135,366
14.4%

Basis of Presentation

We have a 52-53 week fiscal year, ending on the Friday nearest to December 31, which for fiscal 2008 was January 2,
2009. Fiscal 2008 was a 53-week year. Fiscal 2007 and 2006 were both 52-week years.

Revenue

In fiscal 2008, total revenue increased by $107.0 million, or 9%, to $1.33 billion from $1.22 billion in fiscal 2007. The
increase in fiscal 2008 was due to stronger performances in the Field Solutions and Mobile Solutions segments.
Engineering and Construction revenue decreased $1.6 million, or 0.2%; Field Solutions increased $100.1 million, or
50%; Mobile Solutions increased $9.4 million, or 6%; and Advanced Devices decreased $0.9 million, or 1%, as
compared to fiscal 2007. In fiscal 2008, revenue growth was primarily driven by new products, a strong agricultural
environment, as well as the impact of acquisitions partially offset by softness in European and U.S. markets in
Engineering and Construction.

* Although revenue increased by 17% on a year over year basis for the first nine months of the year, our revenue in the
fourth quarter declined by 14% over the corresponding quarter in the prior year. Although we have limited visibility into
fiscal 2009, due to the current economic crisis, we expect that there will be continued softness in our revenue in the first
quarter of 2009 as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year, particularly in our Engineering and
Construction segment.

In fiscal 2007, total revenue increased by $282.1 million, or 30%, to $1.22 billion from $940.2 million in fiscal 2006.
The increase in fiscal 2007 was due to stronger performances across all our operating segments. Engineering and
Construction revenue increased $106.2 million, or 17%; Field Solutions increased $61.4 million, or 44%; Mobile
Solutions increased $96.8 million, or 159%; and Advanced Devices increased $17.7 million, or 17%, as compared to
fiscal 2006. Revenue growth within these segments was primarily driven by new products, a robust agricultural
environment, strong international growth, as well as the impact of acquisitions, partially offset by regional pockets of
softness in the U.S. markets.

* During fiscal 2008, sales to customers in the United States represented 49%, Europe represented 25%, Asia Pacific
represented 14%, and other regions represented 12% of our total revenue. During the 2007 fiscal year, sales to customers
in the United States represented 50%, Europe represented 27%, Asia Pacific represented 12%, and other regions
represented 11% of our total revenue. During fiscal 2006, sales to customers in the United States represented 54%,
Europe represented 25%, Asia Pacific represented 12%, and other regions represented 9% of our total revenue. We
anticipate that sales to international customers will continue to account for a major portion of our revenue.

* No single customer accounted for 10% or more of our total revenue in fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006. It is possible,
however, that in future periods the failure of one or more large customers to purchase products in quantities anticipated
by us may adversely affect the results of operations.

Gross Margin

Our gross margin varies due to a number of factors including product mix, pricing, distribution channel used, effects of
production volumes, new product start-up costs, and foreign currency translations.

In fiscal 2008, our gross margin increased by $36.2 million as compared to fiscal 2007 primarily due to higher revenue.
Gross margin as a percentage of total revenue was 48.8% in fiscal 2008 and 50.1% in fiscal 2007. The decrease in the
gross margin percentage was driven primarily by increased amortization of purchased intangibles, and product mix.

In fiscal 2007, our gross margin increased by $151.8 million as compared to fiscal 2006 due to higher revenue, higher
margin products, including software and subscription revenue, and improved manufacturing utilization, partially offset
by an increase in amortization of purchased intangibles primarily due to the acquisition of @Road. Gross margin as a
percentage of total revenue was 50.1% in fiscal 2007 and 49.0% in fiscal 2006. The increase in the gross margin
percentage was due to higher margin products.

* Because of potential product mix changes within and among the industry markets, market pressures on unit selling
prices, fluctuations in unit manufacturing costs, including increases in component prices and other factors, current level
gross margin cannot be assured.

Operating Income

Operating income increased by $7.2 million for fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007. Operating income as a
percentage of total revenue for fiscal 2008 was 14.0% as compared to 14.6% for fiscal 2007. The increase in
operating income was primarily driven by higher revenue and associated gross margin. The decrease in operating
income percentage was primarily due by increased amortization of purchased intangibles, product mix and foreign
exchange.

* Although our operating income increased on a year over year basis for the first nine months of the year, our operating
income in the fourth quarter declined as compared to the corresponding quarter in the prior year. Although we are
reducing expenses, due to the current economic crisis, we may experience operating income decline in the first quarter of
fiscal 2009 as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year.

Operating income increased by $42.9 million for fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. Operating income as a
percentage of total revenue for fiscal 2007 was 14.6% as compared to 14.4% for fiscal 2006. The increase in operating
income was due to higher revenue and associated gross margin and software and subscription revenue, partially offset by
additional amortization of purchased intangibles.

Results by Segment

To achieve distribution, marketing, production, and technology advantages in our targeted markets, we manage our
operations in the following four segments: Engineering and Construction, Field Solutions, Mobile Solutions, and
Advanced Devices. Operating income (loss) equals net revenue less cost of sales and operating expense, excluding
general corporate expense, amortization of purchased intangible assets, in-process research and development expense,
restructuring charges, non-operating income (expense) net, and income tax provision.

The following table is a breakdown of revenue and operating income by segment for the periods indicated and should be
read in conjunction with the narrative descriptions below.

Fiscal Years Ended

(Dollars in thousands)

Engineering and Construction

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

December 29,
2006

Revenue ......................................................................................................... $ 741,668 $ 743,291 $ 637,118
Segment revenue as a percent of total revenue .............................................
68%
Operating income .......................................................................................... $ 126,014 $ 174,177 $ 136,157
21%
Operating income as a percent of segment revenue ......................................

17%

56%

23%

61%

Field Solutions

Revenue ......................................................................................................... $ 300,708 $ 200,614 $ 139,230
15%
Segment revenue as a percent of total revenue .............................................
22%
37,377
Operating income .......................................................................................... $ 109,489 $
27%
36%
Operating income as a percent of segment revenue ......................................

16%
60,933 $
30%

Mobile Solutions

Revenue ......................................................................................................... $ 167,113 $ 157,673 $
13%
Revenue as a percent of total consolidated revenue ......................................
12,517 $
Operating income .......................................................................................... $
8%
Operating income as a percent of segment revenue ......................................

13%
11,328 $
7%

60,854
6%
2,550
4%

Advanced Devices

Revenue ......................................................................................................... $ 119,745 $ 120,692 $ 102,948
11%
Segment revenue as a percent of total revenue .............................................
10,084
Operating income .......................................................................................... $
10%
Operating income as a percent of segment revenue ......................................

9%
24,445 $
20%

10%
17,276 $
14%

A reconciliation of our consolidated segment operating income to consolidated income before income taxes follows:

Fiscal Years Ended

(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28, December 29,

2007

2006

Consolidated segment operating income ....................................................... $
Unallocated corporate expense ......................................................................
Restructuring charges ....................................................................................
Amortization of purchased intangible assets .................................................
In-process research and development expense ..............................................
Consolidated operating income .....................................................................
Non-operating income, net ............................................................................
Consolidated income before taxes ................................................................. $

271,276 $
(36,284)
(4,641)
(44,891)
-
185,460
6,502
191,962 $

264,903 $
(42,914)
(3,025)
(38,582)
(2,112)
178,267
5,489
183,756 $

186,168
(35,798)
-
(13,074)
(1,930)
135,366
12,726
148,092

Engineering and Construction

Engineering and Construction revenue decreased by $1.6 million, or 0.2%, while segment operating income decreased
by $48.0 million, or 28%, for fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007. The revenue decrease was primarily due to
recessionary conditions in the U.S. and European markets partially offset by strength in the rest of world markets.
Operating income decreased as a result of the slight decline in revenue, product mix and operating expense associated
with acquisitions in the last twelve months.

Engineering and Construction revenue increased by $106.2 million, or 17%, while segment operating income increased
by $38.0 million, or 28%, for fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. The revenue growth was driven by all business
units within the segment, strong international markets, acquisitions made during fiscal 2007 and foreign exchange
gains. Segment operating income increased as a result of higher revenue and increased sales of higher margin products
including software revenue and operating expense control.

Field Solutions

Field Solutions revenue increased by approximately $100.1 million, or 50%, while segment operating income increased
by $48.6 million, or 80%, for fiscal year 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007. The increase in revenue was driven primarily
by strong sales of agriculture products, both in the U.S. and internationally. Operating income increased primarily due to
increased revenue, as well as improvement in product costs.

Field Solutions revenue increased by approximately $61.4 million, or 44%, while segment operating income increased
by $23.6 million, or 63%, for fiscal year 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. The increase in revenue was driven primarily
by the introduction of new agricultural products and a robust agricultural market, both in the U.S. and
internationally. Operating income increased primarily due to higher revenue and operating expense control.

Mobile Solutions

Mobile Solutions revenue increased by $9.4 million, or 6%, while segment operating income decreased by $1.2 million,
or 9%, for fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007. Revenue grew due to increased subscription revenue and a full first
quarter of @Road revenue as compared to a partial first quarter of @Road revenue in fiscal 2007. Operating income
decreased primarily due to increased research and development and sales expense for our new Field Service software,
partially offset by a reduction in marketing and general and administrative expenses.

Mobile Solutions revenue increased by $96.8 million, or 159%, while segment operating income increased by $10.0
million, or 391%, for fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. Revenue grew due to increased subscription revenue due
primarily to the @Road acquisition. Operating income increased primarily due to higher subscription revenue and
associated gross margin.

Advanced Devices

Advanced Devices revenue decreased by $0.9 million, or 1%, and segment operating income increased by $7.2 million,
or 42%, for fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007. The decrease in revenue was primarily driven by slower sales of
Component Technologies products. Operating income increased due to product mix, royalty and licensing revenue.

Advanced Devices revenue increased by $17.7 million, or 17%, and segment operating income increased by $7.2
million, or 71%, for fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. The increase in revenue was primarily driven by stronger
performance in our Component Technologies timing and embedded product revenue. Operating income increased due to
strong timing and embedded product revenue, licensing revenue associated with a Nokia intellectual property agreement
signed in the third quarter of 2006, and strong operating expense control.

Research and Development, Sales and Marketing, and General and Administrative Expenses

The following table shows research and development (“R&D”), sales and marketing, and general and administrative
(“G&A”) expenses in absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenue for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006 and
should be read in conjunction with the narrative descriptions of those operating expense below.

Fiscal Years Ended

(Dollars in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,

December 29,

2007

2006

Research and development ............................................. $
Percentage of revenue .....................................................
Sales and marketing ........................................................
Percentage of revenue .....................................................
General and administrative .............................................
Percentage of revenue .....................................................
Total ............................................................................ $
Percentage of revenue .....................................................

148,265

$
11%

196,290

15%

94,023

438,578

7%
$
33%

131,468

$
11%

186,495

15%

92,572

410,535

8%
$
34%

103,840
11%
143,623
15%
68,416
7%
315,879
33%

Overall, R&D, sales and marketing, and G&A expenses increased by approximately $28.0 million in fiscal 2008
compared to fiscal 2007.

Research and development expense increased by $16.8 million in fiscal 2008, as compared to fiscal 2007, primarily due
to the impact of new R&D expense as a result of acquisitions, an increase in compensation related expense, an increase
in R&D materials and an increase due to foreign currency exchange rates. All of our R&D costs have been expensed as
incurred. Overall research and development spending remained relatively constant at approximately 11% of revenue.

Research and development expense increased by $27.6 million in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 primarily due to
the impact of new R&D expense as a result of acquisitions, an increase in compensation related expense, and an increase
due to foreign currency exchange rates, partially offset by decreased consulting fees. All of our R&D costs have been
expensed as incurred. Overall research and development spending remained relatively constant at approximately 11% of
revenue.

* We believe that the development and introduction of new products are critical to our future success and we expect to
continue active development of new products.

Sales and marketing expense increased by $9.8 million in fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007. The increase was
primarily due to new sales and marketing expenses as a result of acquisitions, an increase in compensation related
expense and an increase in trade shows and marketing literature expense. Spending overall remained relatively constant
at approximately 15% of revenue.

Sales and marketing expense increased by $42.9 million in fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. The increase was
primarily due to new sales and marketing expenses as a result of acquisitions, an increase in compensation-related
expense, an increase due to foreign currency exchange rates and an increase in marketing expense. Spending overall
remained relatively constant at approximately 15% of revenue.

* Our future growth will depend in part on the timely development and continued viability of the markets in which we
currently compete as well as our ability to continue to identify and develop new markets for our products.

General and administrative expense increased by $1.5 million in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 primarily due to
new G&A expenses as a result of acquisitions, partially offset by decreased compensation related expense and reduced
deferred compensation liabilities. Spending overall was at approximately 7% of revenue in fiscal 2008 compared to 8%
in fiscal 2007.

General and administrative expense increased by $24.2 million in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 primarily due to
new G&A expenses as a result of acquisitions, an increase in compensation-related expense, and an increase in tax and
legal fees. Spending overall was at approximately 8% of revenue in fiscal 2007 compared to 7% in fiscal 2006.

Other Operating Expenses

Restructuring Charges

Restructuring expense for the three years ended January 2, 2009 was as follows:

(in thousands)

2008

2007

2006

Severance and benefits ................. $

4,641

3,025

During fiscal 2008, restructuring expense of $4.6 million was related to decisions to streamline processes and reduce the
cost structure of the Company, with approximately 100 employees affected worldwide. Of the total restructuring
expense, $2.7 million is shown as a separate line within Operating expense on our Consolidated Statements of Income,
and $1.9 million is included within Cost of sales. Additionally, $4.1 million is related to the Engineering and
Construction segment and $0.5 million is related to the Mobile Solutions segment. As a result of the above decisions, we
expect restructuring activities in the Engineering and Construction segment to result in additional restructuring expense
totaling approximately $1.8 million through the first quarter of 2010. Additional restructuring activities have been
announced in the first fiscal quarter of 2009.

During fiscal, 2007, restructuring expense of $3.0 million was for charges associated with the Company’s acquisition of
@Road. The restructuring expense was related to the acceleration of vesting of employee stock options for certain
terminated @Road employees, of which $1.4 million was settled in cash and $1.6 million was recorded as shareholders’
equity.

Restructuring costs associated with a business combination:
In addition to the restructuring expense in fiscal 2008, costs associated with exiting activities of companies we acquired
in fiscal 2008 was $0.4 million, consisting of severance and benefits costs. These costs were recognized as a liability
assumed in the business combinations and were included in the allocation of the cost to acquisitions and accordingly,
resulted in an increase to goodwill rather than an expense in fiscal 2008. The Company also had $0.9 million in
restructuring activity reversals related to costs associated with exiting activities of pre-merger @Road. The reversals
were primarily due to severance and benefits costs for employees whose positions were retained in a variety of functions.
The reversals were recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 as a reduction of the liability assumed in the purchase
business combination that had been included in the allocation of the cost to acquire @Road and, accordingly, resulted in
a decrease to goodwill rather than an expense reduction in fiscal 2008.

In addition to the restructuring expense in fiscal 2007, costs associated with exiting activities of pre-merger @Road of
$3.6 million, consisted of severance and benefits costs. These costs were recognized as a liability assumed in the
purchase business combination and were included in the allocation of the cost to acquire @Road and accordingly,
resulted in an increase to goodwill rather than an expense in fiscal 2007.

Restructuring liability:
The following table summarizes the restructuring activity for 2007 and 2008 (in thousands):

Balance as of December 30, 2006 .................... $
Acquisition related ........................................
Charges .........................................................
Payments .......................................................
Adjustment ....................................................
Balance as of December 28, 2007 .................... $
Acquisition related ........................................
Charges .........................................................
Payments .......................................................
Adjustment ....................................................
Balance as of January 2, 2009 .......................... $

744
3,547
3,025
(6,004)
14
1,326
355
4,641
(3,351)
(1,054)
1,917

As of January 2, 2009, the $1.9 million restructuring accrual consists of severance and benefits. Of the $1.9 million
restructuring accrual, $0.7 million is included in Other current liabilities and is expected to be settled by the first half of
fiscal 2009. The remaining balance of $1.2 million is included in Other non-current liabilities and is expected to be
settled by the first quarter of fiscal 2010.

In-Process Research and Development

We recorded in-process research and development (IPR&D) expense of $2.1 million and $1.9 million related to
acquisitions made in fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. No IPR&D expense was recorded in fiscal 2008. At the date of
each acquisition, the projects associated with the IPR&D efforts had not yet reached technological feasibility and the
research and development in process had no alternative future uses. The value of the IPR&D was determined using a
discounted cash flow model similar to the income approach, focusing on the income producing capabilities of the in-
process technologies. Accordingly, the value assigned to these IPR&D amounts were charged to expense on the
respective acquisition date of each of the acquired companies.

Amortization of Purchased and Other Intangible Assets

Fiscal Years Ended
(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

December 29,
2006

Cost of sales ................................................... $
Operating expenses ........................................
Total ........................................................... $

22,690
22,376
45,066

19,778
18,966
38,744

5,353
7,906
13,259

Total amortization expense of purchased and other intangible assets was $45.1 million in fiscal 2008, of which $22.7
million was recorded in cost of sales and $22.4 million was recorded in operating expense. Total amortization expense of
purchased and other intangibles represented 3.4% of revenue in fiscal 2008, an increase of $6.3 million from fiscal 2007
when it represented 3.2% of revenue. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of certain technology and patent
intangibles as a result of acquisitions made in fiscal 2008, as well as fiscal 2007 acquisition intangibles that included a
full year impact of amortization expense in fiscal 2008.

Total amortization expense of purchased and other intangible assets was $38.7 million in fiscal 2007, of which $19.8
million was recorded in cost of sales and $19.0 million was recorded in operating expense. Total amortization expense
of purchased and other intangibles represented 3.2% of revenue in fiscal 2007, an increase of $25.5 million from fiscal
2006 when it represented 1.4% of revenue. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of certain technology and
patent intangibles as a result of acquisitions made in fiscal 2007, primarily @Road, and to a lesser extent, fiscal 2006
acquisition intangibles that included a full year impact of amortization expense in fiscal 2007.

Non-operating Income (Expense), Net

The following table shows non-operating income (expense), net for the periods indicated and should be read in
conjunction with the narrative descriptions of those expenses below:

Fiscal Years Ended
(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

December 29,
2006

Interest income ................................................ $
Interest expense ...............................................
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss), net ...
Income from joint ventures ..............................
Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries
Other income (expense), net ............................
Total non-operating income (expense), net ......... $

2,044
(2,760)
1,509
7,981
540
(2,812)
6,502

3,502
(6,602)
(1,351)
8,377

1,563
5,489

3,799
(558)
1,719
6,989
-
777
12,726

Total non-operating income (expense), net increased by $1.0 million during fiscal 2008 compared with fiscal 2007. The
increase was due to lower interest expense due to lower average outstanding debt balances and interest rates, fluctuations
in foreign currencies, largely offset by a decrease in interest income and losses on assets in our deferred compensation
plan.

Total non-operating income (expense), net decreased by $7.2 million during fiscal 2007 compared with fiscal 2006. The
decrease was due to higher interest expense due to an increase in debt associated with the @Road acquisition,
fluctuations in foreign currencies, partially offset by increased profits from our CTCT joint venture.

Income Tax Provision

Our effective income tax rate for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006 was 26%, 36% and 30% respectively. The 2008 rate
was less than the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the implementation of a global supply chain
management structure. In 2006 and 2007, we licensed our US intellectual property to a foreign affiliated legal entity and
implemented a global supply chain management structure which streamlined our worldwide operations. We believe that
the licensing of intellectual property was effected for consideration that was equivalent to arms-length negotiated
pricing. This resulted, beginning in 2008, in a tax savings due to a lower foreign tax rate. For financial statement

purposes and the Company’s policy with respect to its undistributed foreign subsidiaries’ earnings some of those
earnings are to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no related provision for U.S. federal and state income taxes
has been provided. The 2007 rate was greater than the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to impacts resulting from
SFAS 123(R). The 2006 rate was less than the US federal statutory rate primarily due to operations in foreign
jurisdictions subject to an effective tax rate lower than the U.S. and the Extraterritorial Income Exclusion (ETI)
deduction.

The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008 and Tax
Extenders and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008 (HR1424) was signed into law on October 3, 2008. This
legislation includes a provision that retroactively extends the research tax credit from January 1, 2008 to December 31,
2009. The Company has included the $2.4 million benefit of the current year research credits in the quarter ended
January 2, 2009.

Litigation Matters

* From time to time, we are involved in litigation arising out of the ordinary course of our business. There are no known
claims or pending litigation that are expected to have a material effect on our overall financial position, results of
operations, or liquidity.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Other than lease commitments incurred in the normal course of business (see Contractual Obligations table below), we
do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or liabilities, guarantee contracts, retained or contingent
interests in transferred assets, or any obligation arising out of a material variable interest in an unconsolidated entity. We
do not have any majority-owned subsidiaries that are not included in the consolidated financial statements. Additionally,
we do not have any interest in, or relationship with, any special purpose entities.

In the normal course of business to facilitate sales of its products, we indemnify other parties, including customers,
lessors, and parties to other transactions with us, with respect to certain matters. We have agreed to hold the other party
harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations or covenants, or out of intellectual property infringement
or other claims made against certain parties. These agreements may limit the time within which an indemnification claim
can be made and the amount of the claim. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our officers
and directors, and our bylaws contain similar indemnification obligations to our agents.

It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to the limited
history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement.
Historically, payments made by us under these agreements were not material and no liabilities have been recorded for
these obligations on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of and for the Fiscal Year Ended
(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

December 29,
2006

Cash and cash equivalents ................................................................................ $ 147,531 $ 103,202 $ 129,621
13.2%
9.0%
As a percentage of total assets ..........................................................................
481
Total debt .......................................................................................................... $ 151,588 $

6.7%
60,690 $

Cash provided by operating activities ............................................................... $ 176,074 $ 186,985 $ 135,843
Cash used in investing activities ....................................................................... $ (121,696) $ (311,392) $ (114,188)
34,162
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities ................................................ $
(49)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents ......................... $
55,768
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ....................................... $

(6,441) $ 103,816 $
(5,828) $
(3,608) $
(26,419) $
44,329 $

Cash and Cash Equivalents

As of January 2, 2009, cash and cash equivalents totaled $147.5 million compared to $103.2 million at December 28,
2007. We had debt of $151.6 million at January 2, 2009 compared to $60.7 million at December 28, 2007.

* Our ability to continue to generate cash from operations will depend in large part on profitability, the rate of collections
of accounts receivable, our inventory turns, and our ability to manage other areas of working capital.

* We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, together with our revolving credit facilities will be sufficient to meet
our anticipated operating cash needs and stock purchases under the stock repurchase program for at least the next twelve
months.

* We anticipate that planned capital expenditures primarily for computer equipment, software, manufacturing tools and
test equipment, and leasehold improvements associated with business expansion, will constitute a partial use of our cash
resources. Decisions related to how much cash is used for investing are influenced by the expected amount of cash to be
provided by operations.

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities was $176.1 million for fiscal 2008, as compared to $187.0 million for fiscal 2007.
This decrease of $10.9 million was due to a decrease in accounts payable, deferred revenue, income taxes payable, and
accrued compensation and benefits, partially offset by an increase in net income before non-cash depreciation and
amortization and a decrease in accounts receivable.

Cash provided by operating activities was $187.0 million for fiscal 2007, as compared to $135.8 million for fiscal 2006.
This increase of $51.1 million was primarily driven by an increase in net income before non-cash depreciation and
amortization and increases in deferred revenue and income taxes payable. This was partially offset by an increase in
accounts receivable due to increased revenue.

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities was $121.7 million for fiscal 2008, as compared to $311.4 million for fiscal 2007. The
decrease was due to cash used for acquisitions, attributable primarily to @Road which was acquired in the first quarter of
fiscal 2007.

Cash used in investing activities was $311.4 million for fiscal 2007, as compared to $114.2 million for fiscal 2006. The
increase was primarily attributable to cash used for the @Road acquisition.

Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities was $6.4 million for fiscal 2008, as compared to cash provided of $103.8 million during
fiscal 2007, primarily due to stock repurchase activities, partially offset by net cash borrowed from the company’s credit
facilities.

Cash provided by financing activities was $103.8 million for fiscal 2007, as compared to $34.2 million for fiscal 2006,
primarily related to outstanding debt that was incurred for the @Road acquisition.

Accounts Receivable and Inventory Metrics

As of

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

Accounts receivable days sales outstanding ........................................
Inventory turns per year .......................................................................

69
4.2

70
4.3

Accounts receivable days sales outstanding were relatively flat at 69 days as of January 2, 2009, as compared to 70 days
as of December 28, 2007. Our accounts receivable days sales outstanding are calculated based on ending accounts
receivable, net, divided by revenue for the fourth fiscal quarter, times a quarterly average of 91 days. The actual fiscal
quarter contained 98 days; however the Company was shut down an additional week during the quarter. Our inventory

turns were at 4.2 for fiscal 2008 as compared to 4.3 for fiscal 2007. Our inventory turnover is based on the total cost of
sales for the fiscal period over the average inventory for the corresponding fiscal period.

Debt

At the end of fiscal 2008, our total debt was comprised primarily of our revolving credit line in the amount of $151.0
million. At the end of fiscal 2007, out total debt was primarily comprised of a term loan in the amount of $60.0 million,
which was repaid during fiscal 2008. As of January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007, there were also notes payable
totaling approximately $588,000 and $690,000, respectively, consisting of government loans to foreign subsidiaries.

On July 28, 2005, we entered into a $200 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (the 2005 Credit Facility) with a
syndicate of 10 banks with The Bank of Nova Scotia as the administrative agent. On February 16, 2007, we amended
our existing $200 million unsecured revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of 11 banks with The Bank of Nova
Scotia as the administrative agent (the 2007 Credit Facility). Under the 2007 Credit Facility, we exercised the option in
the existing credit agreement to increase the availability under the revolving credit line by $100 million, for an aggregate
availability of up to $300 million, and extended the maturity date of the revolving credit line by 18 months, from July
2010 to February 2012. Up to $25 million of the availability under the revolving credit line may be used to issue letters
of credit, and up to $20 million may be used for paying off other debts or loans. The maximum leverage ratio under the
2007 Credit Facility is 3.00:1.00. The funds available under the new 2007 Credit Facility may be used by us for
acquisitions, stock repurchases, and general corporate purposes. As of August 20, 2008, we amended the 2007 Credit
Facility to allow us to redeem, retire or purchase Trimble common stock. In addition, the definition of the fixed charge
was amended to exclude the impact of redemptions, retirements, or purchases of Trimble common stock from the fixed
charges coverage ratio. For additional discussion of our debt, see Note 9 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.

In addition, during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 we incurred a five-year term loan under the 2007 Credit Facility in an
aggregate principal amount of $100 million, which was repaid in full during fiscal 2008.

We may borrow funds under the 2007 Credit Facility in U.S. Dollars or in certain other currencies, and borrowings will
bear interest, at our option, at either: (i) a base rate, based on the administrative agent's prime rate, plus a margin of
between 0% and 0.125%, depending on our leverage ratio as of our most recently ended fiscal quarter, or (ii) a reserve-
adjusted rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR),
Stockholm Interbank Offered Rate (STIBOR), or other agreed-upon rate, depending on the currency borrowed, plus a
margin of between 0.625% and 1.125%, depending on our leverage ratio as of the most recently ended fiscal quarter. Our
obligations under the 2007 Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries.

The 2007 Credit Facility contains customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants including, among other
requirements, negative covenants that restrict our ability to dispose of assets, create liens, incur indebtedness, repurchase
stock, pay dividends, make acquisitions, make investments, enter into mergers and consolidations and make capital
expenditures, within certain limitations, and financial covenants that require the maintenance of leverage and fixed
charge coverage ratios. The 2007 Credit Facility contains events of default that include, among others, non-payment of
principal, interest or fees, breach of covenants, inaccuracy of representations and warranties, cross defaults to certain
other indebtedness, bankruptcy and insolvency events, material judgments, and events constituting a change of control.
Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default, interest on the obligations will accrue at an
increased rate and the lenders may accelerate our obligations under the 2007 Credit Facility, however that acceleration
will be automatic in the case of bankruptcy and insolvency events of default. As of January 2, 2009 we were in
compliance with all financial debt covenants.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at January 2, 2009:

Less than
1 year

Payments Due By Period
1-3
years

3-5
years

More than

5 years

Total

(in thousands)

Total debt including interest (1) .......................... $
Operating leases ..................................................
Other purchase obligations and commitments ....
Total .................................................................... $

177,258 $
44,179
68,722
290,159 $

5,258 $
17,598
58,026
80,882 $

15,866 $ 156,134 $
6,675
19,750
-
10,692
46,308 $ 162,809 $

-
156
4
160

(1) We may borrow funds under the 2007 Credit Facility in U.S. Dollars or in certain other currencies, and will bear
interest as described under Note 9 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our obligations under the 2007
Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries. We estimate the interest to be 3.4% per annum,
based upon a historical average.

Total debt consists of a revolving credit line of $151.0 million under our credit facilities and government loans of $0.6
million to foreign subsidiaries. (See Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further financial
information regarding long-term debt)

Other purchase obligations and commitments represent open non-cancelable purchase orders for material purchases with
our vendors. Purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty. Our pension obligation, which
is not included in the table above, is included in “Other current liabilities” and “Other non-current liabilities” on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Additionally, as of January 2, 2009, we had acquisition earn-outs of $6.3 million and
holdbacks of $20.8 million recorded in “Other current liabilities” and “Other non-current liabilities.” The maximum
remaining payments, including the $6.3 million and $20.8 million recorded, will not exceed $71.7 million. The
remaining earn-outs and holdbacks are payable through 2012.

We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” (FIN 48), on December 30,
2006. A total of $37.3 million, including interest and penalties, represents the FIN 48 liability at January 2, 2009. At
this time, we cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement with tax authorities regarding
this liability.

EFFECT OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The impact of recent accounting pronouncements is disclosed in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We use certain
derivative financial instruments to manage these risks. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative
purposes. All financial instruments are used in accordance with policies approved by our board of directors.

Market Interest Rate Risk

Our cash equivalents consisted primarily of money market funds, treasury bills, commercial paper (FDIC insured),
interest and non-interest bearing bank deposits as well as bank time deposits for fiscal 2008 and 2007. The main
objective of these instruments was safety of principal and liquidity while maximizing return, without significantly
increasing risk.

* Due to the short-term nature of our cash equivalents, we do not anticipate any material effect on our portfolio due to
fluctuations in interest rates.

We are exposed to market risk due to the possibility of changing interest rates under our senior secured credit facilities.
Our credit facility is comprised of an unsecured revolving credit agreement with a maturity date of February 2012. We
may borrow funds under the revolving credit agreement in U.S. Dollars or in certain other currencies and borrowings
will bear interest as described under Note 9 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As of January 2, 2009, we had an outstanding balance on the revolving credit line of $151.0 million and during fiscal
2008, we repaid the remaining outstanding principal balance on our term loan. A hypothetical 10% increase in the three-
month LIBOR rates could result in approximately $0.2 million annual increase in interest expense on the existing
principal balances.

* The hypothetical changes and assumptions made above will be different from what actually occurs in the future.
Furthermore, the computations do not anticipate actions that may be taken by our management should the hypothetical
market changes actually occur over time. As a result, actual earnings effects in the future will differ from those
quantified above.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to minimize the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations on
certain trade and inter-company receivables and payables, primarily denominated in Australian, Canadian, Japanese,
New Zealand, South African and Swedish currencies, the Euro, and the British pound. These contracts reduce the
exposure to fluctuations in exchange rate movements as the gains and losses associated with foreign currency balances
are generally offset with the gains and losses on the forward contracts. These instruments are marked to market through
earnings every period and generally range from one to three months in original maturity. We do not enter into foreign
exchange forward contracts for trading purposes.

Foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding as of January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007 are summarized as
follows (in thousands):

Forward contracts:

Purchased ........................................................ $
Sold ................................................................. $

(22,012) $
24,960 $

512 $
(1,660) $

(34,865) $
34,946 $

374
(552)

January 2, 2009

December 28, 2007

Nominal Amount

Fair Value

Nominal Amount

Fair Value

* We do not anticipate any material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position utilizing our current hedging
strategy.

TRIMBLE NAVIGATION LIMITED
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007 ...................................................................

Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2009, December 28, 2007 and

December 29, 2006 ...................................................................................................................................................

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2009, December 28, 2007

and December 29, 2006 .............................................................................................................................................

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2009, December 28, 2007 and

December 29, 2006 ...................................................................................................................................................

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements .................................................................................................................

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm........................................................................................

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

ASSETS
Current assets:

January 2,
2009

December 28,

2007

Cash and cash equivalents ..................................................................................................... $
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,999 and $5,221, and

sales return reserve of $1,819and $1,683 at January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007,
respectively ........................................................................................................................
Other receivables ...................................................................................................................
Inventories, net ......................................................................................................................
Deferred income taxes ...........................................................................................................
Other current assets ...............................................................................................................
Total current assets ............................................................................................................
Property and equipment, net .....................................................................................................
Goodwill ...................................................................................................................................
Other purchased intangible assets, net ......................................................................................
Other non-current assets ...........................................................................................................
Total assets ........................................................................................................................ $

147,531 $

103,202

204,269
17,540
160,893
41,810
16,404
588,447
50,175
715,571
228,901
51,922

239,884
10,201
143,018
44,333
15,661
556,299
51,444
675,850
197,777
57,989
1,635,016 $ 1,539,359

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:

Current portion of long-term debt ......................................................................................... $
Accounts payable ..................................................................................................................
Accrued compensation and benefits ......................................................................................
Deferred revenue ...................................................................................................................
Accrued warranty expense ....................................................................................................
Income taxes payable ............................................................................................................
Other current liabilities .........................................................................................................
Total current liabilities .......................................................................................................
Non-current portion of long-term debt .....................................................................................
Non-current deferred revenue ...................................................................................................
Deferred income taxes ..............................................................................................................
Other non-current liabilities ......................................................................................................
Total liabilities ...................................................................................................................

124 $
49,611
41,291
55,241
13,332
-
63,719
223,318
151,464
12,418
42,207
61,553
490,960

126
67,589
55,133
49,416
10,806
14,802
51,980
249,852
60,564
15,872
47,917
56,128
430,333

Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries .........................................................................

3,655

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders' equity:

Preferred stock no par value; 3,000 shares authorized; none outstanding Common stock,

no par value; 180,000 shares authorized; 119,051 and 121,596 shares issued and
outstanding at January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007, respectively ..............................
Retained earnings ..................................................................................................................
Accumulated other comprehensive income ...........................................................................
Total shareholders' equity ..................................................................................................
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity ........................................................................... $

684,831
427,921
27,649

660,749
388,557
59,720
1,140,401 1,109,026
1,635,016 $ 1,539,359

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)

January 2,

December 28, December 29,

2009

2007

2006

Revenue (1) ........................................................................................................... $ 1,329,234 $ 1,222,270 $
609,365
Cost of sales (1) ....................................................................................................
612,905
Gross margin .........................................................................................................

680,098
649,136

940,150
479,069
461,081

Operating expense

Research and development ................................................................................
Sales and marketing ..........................................................................................
General and administrative ................................................................................
Restructuring charges ........................................................................................
Amortization of purchased intangible assets .....................................................
In-process research and development ................................................................
Total operating expense .................................................................................
Operating income ..................................................................................................
Non-operating income (expense), net

Interest income ..................................................................................................
Interest expense .................................................................................................
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss), net ....................................................
Income from joint ventures ...............................................................................
Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries .................................................
Other income (expense), net ..............................................................................
Total non-operating income (expense), net ...................................................
Income before taxes ..............................................................................................
Income tax provision ............................................................................................
Net income ............................................................................................................ $

148,265
196,290
94,023
2,722
22,376
-
463,676
185,460

2,044
(2,760)
1,509
7,981
540
(2,812)
6,502
191,962
50,490
141,472 $

131,468
186,495
92,572
3,025
18,966
2,112
434,638
178,267

3,502
(6,602)
(1,351)
8,377
-
1,563
5,489
183,756
66,382
117,374 $

103,840
143,623
68,416
-
7,906
1,930
325,715
135,366

3,799
(558)
1,719
6,989
-
777
12,726
148,092
44,434
103,658

Basic earnings per share ....................................................................................... $
Shares used in calculating basic earnings per share ..............................................

1.17 $
120,714

0.98 $
119,280

0.94
110,044

Diluted earnings per share .................................................................................... $
Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share ...........................................

1.14 $
124,235

0.94 $
124,410

0.89
116,072

(1) Sales to Caterpillar Trimble Control Technologies Joint Venture (CTCT) and Nikon-Trimble Joint Venture (Nikon-
Trimble) were $27.0 million, $24.1 million and $22.3 million in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, with
associated cost of sales of $21.5 million, $17.0 million and $13.9 million for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. In addition, cost of sales associated with CTCT net inventory purchases was $21.4 million, $25.1 million
and $19.5 million in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. See Note 5 to these Consolidated Financial Statements
regarding joint ventures for further discussion.

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common stock

Amount

Retained
Earnings

Comprehensive Shareholders'
Income/(Loss)

Equity

Accumulative
Other

Total

(In thousands)

Balance at December 30, 2005 ........................... $

107,820 $

384,196 $

167,525 $

19,534 $

571,255

Components of comprehensive income:

Net income ...................................................
Unrealized loss on investments ...................
Foreign currency translation adjustments,

net of tax ..................................................
Total comprehensive income ...................

Adjustment to initially apply FASB

Statement No. 158, net of tax ......................

Issuance of common stock in connection

with acquisitions and joint venture, net .......

3,846

111,718 $

26,781
12,705
11,689
435,371 $

Issuance of common stock under employee

plans and exercise of warrants .....................
Stock based compensation ..............................
Tax benefit from stock option exercises ..........
Balance at December 29, 2006 ...........................
Components of comprehensive income: .........
Net income ...................................................
Unrealized loss on investments ...................
Foreign currency translation adjustments,

net of tax ..................................................
Unrecognized actuarial loss .........................
Total comprehensive income ...................

Issuance of common stock in connection

with acquisitions and joint venture, net .......

5,876

163,678

103,658

21,709

103,658
4

21,709
125,371

(136)

271,183 $

41,111 $

117,374

(33)

18,655
(13)

26,781
12,705
11,689
747,665

117,374
(33)

18,655
(13)
135,983

163,678

Issuance of common stock under employee

plans and exercise of warrants .....................
Stock based compensation ..............................
Tax benefit from stock option exercises ..........
Minority interest ..............................................
Balance at December 28, 2007 ........................... $
Components of comprehensive income: .........
Net income ...................................................
Unrealized loss on investments ...................
Foreign currency translation adjustments,

net of tax ..................................................
Unrecognized actuarial gain ........................
Total comprehensive income ...................

Issuance of common stock under employee

plans and exercise of warrants .....................
Stock repurchase .............................................
Stock based compensation ..............................
Tax benefit from stock option exercises ..........
Balance at January 2, 2009 .................................

4,002

121,596 $

31,913
15,099
14,637
51
660,749 $

388,557 $

141,472

31,913
15,099
14,637
51
59,720 $ 1,109,026

(392)

(31,722)
43

141,472
(392)

(31,722)
43
109,401

1,698
(4,243)

119,051 $

22,804
(23,780)
16,293
8,765
684,831 $

(102,108)

427,921 $

22,804
(125,888)
16,293
8,765
27,649 $ 1,140,401

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Fiscal Years Ended

(In thousands)

Cash flows from operating activities:

January 2,
2009

December 28, December 29,

2007

2006

Net income .................................................................................................................. $

141,472 $

117,374 $

103,658

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation ...............................................................................................................
Amortization ...............................................................................................................
Provision for doubtful accounts ..................................................................................
Amortization of debt issuance cost .............................................................................
Deferred income taxes ................................................................................................
Non-cash restructuring expense ..................................................................................
Stock-based compensation ..........................................................................................
In-process research and development .........................................................................
Equity gain from joint ventures ..................................................................................
Excess tax benefit for stock-based compensation .......................................................
Provision for excess and obsolete inventories ............................................................
Other ...........................................................................................................................

Add decrease (increase) in assets:

Accounts receivable ................................................................................................
Other receivables ....................................................................................................
Inventories ..............................................................................................................
Other current and non-current assets ......................................................................
Add increase (decrease) in liabilities: .............................................................................
Accounts payable ....................................................................................................
Accrued compensation and benefits .......................................................................
Accrued liabilities ...................................................................................................
Deferred revenue ....................................................................................................
Income taxes payable ..............................................................................................
Net cash provided by operating activities .......................................................................

19,047
45,066
2,709
169
(17,356)
-
16,166
-
(7,981)
(5,970)
4,426
(348)

33,414
(7,422)
(16,461)
779

17,212
38,744
1,410
218
6,368
1,725
15,016
2,112
(8,377)
(12,409)
4,352
651

(35,696)
4,825
(18,678)
7,650

(20,898)
(12,487)
3,183
(1,320)
(114)
176,074

(3,521)
1,691
(4,635)
32,400
18,553
186,985

13,523
13,259
163
180
10,368
-
12,571
1,930
(6,989)
(8,761)
7,376
720

(12,185)
(51)
(7,588)
(18,936)

(4,487)
7,807
9,790
3,263
10,232
135,843

Cash flows from investing activities:

Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired ........................................................
Acquisition of property and equipment ......................................................................
Purchase of debt and equity securities ........................................................................
Proceeds from dividends .............................................................................................
Capital infusion from minority investor ......................................................................
Other ...........................................................................................................................
Net cash used in investing activities ...............................................................................

(115,137)
(16,196)
-
10,648
4,200
(5,211)
(121,696)

(295,848)
(13,187)
(5,576)
2,888
-
331
(311,392)

(99,887)
(16,529)
-
2,244
-
(16)
(114,188)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Issuance of common stock and warrants .....................................................................
Excess tax benefit for stock-based compensation .......................................................
Repurchase and retirement of common stock .............................................................
Proceeds from long-term debt and revolving credit lines ...........................................
Payments on long-term debt and revolving credit lines ..............................................
Other ...........................................................................................................................
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities ........................................................

22,802
5,970
(125,888)
151,000
(60,314)
(11)
(6,441)

31,864
12,409
-
250,000
(190,457)
-
103,816

26,566
8,761
-
-
-
(1,165)
34,162

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents .......................................

(3,608)

(5,828)

(49)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents .....................................................
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of fiscal year .......................................................
Cash and cash equivalents, end of fiscal year ................................................................. $

44,329
103,202
147,531 $

(26,419)
129,621
103,202 $

55,768
73,853
129,621

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1: DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Trimble Navigation Limited (Trimble or the Company) began operations in 1978 and incorporated in California in 1981.
The Company provides positioning product solutions, most typically to commercial and government users. The principal
applications served include surveying, construction, agriculture, urban and resource management, military, transportation
and telecommunications. The Company’s products typically provide its customers benefits that can include lower
operational costs, higher productivity, and improved quality. Examples of products include systems that guide
agricultural and construction equipment, surveying instruments, systems that track fleets of vehicles, and data collection
systems that enable the management of large amounts of geo-referenced information. In addition, the Company also
manufactures components for in-vehicle navigation and telematics systems, and timing modules used in the
synchronization of wireless networks.

NOTE 2: ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Estimates are used for allowances for doubtful accounts, sales returns reserve, allowances for
inventory valuation, warranty costs, investments, goodwill impairments, stock-based compensation, and income taxes
among others. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions believed to be
reasonable. Although these estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions that may
impact the company in the future, actual results may differ materially from management’s estimates.

Basis of Presentation

The Company has a 52-53 week fiscal year, ending on the Friday nearest to December 31. Fiscal 2008 was a 53-week
year and ended on January 2, 2009. Fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 were both 52-week years, and ended on December 28,
2007 and December 29, 2006, respectively. Unless otherwise stated, all dates refer to the Company’s fiscal year.

These Consolidated Financial Statements include the results of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries. Inter-
company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries represent the
minority shareholders’ proportionate share of the net assets and results of operations of the Company’s majority-owned
subsidiaries.

On January 17, 2007, the Company’s board of directors approved a 2-for-1 split of all outstanding shares of the
Company’s Common Stock, payable February 22, 2007 to stockholders of record on February 8, 2007. All shares and
per share information presented has been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis for all periods presented.

Foreign Currency Translation

Assets and liabilities of non-U.S. subsidiaries that operate in local currencies are translated to U.S. dollars at exchange
rates in effect at the balance sheet date, with the resulting translation adjustments directly recorded to a separate
component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax in accumulated other comprehensive income within
the shareholders’ equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Income and expense accounts are translated at
average exchange rates during the year.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and highly liquid investments with insignificant interest rate risk and
maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents
approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, and other accrued
liabilities approximate cost because of their short maturities. The fair value of investments is determined using quoted
market prices for those securities or similar financial instruments.

Concentration of Risk

Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with several financial institutions. Deposits held with banks may exceed the
amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and are
maintained with financial institutions of reputable credit and therefore bear minimal credit risk.

The Company is also exposed to credit risk in the Company’s trade receivables, which are derived from sales to end user
customers in diversified industries as well as various resellers. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its
customers’ financial condition and limits the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary, but generally does not
require collateral.

With the selection of Flextronics Corporation in August 1999 as an exclusive manufacturing partner for many of its GPS
products, the Company became dependent upon a sole supplier for the manufacture of many of its products. In addition,
the Company relies on sole suppliers for a number of its critical components.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its
customers to make required payments.

The Company evaluates the ongoing collectibility of its trade accounts receivable based on a number of factors such as
age of the accounts receivable balances, credit quality, historical experience, and current economic conditions that may
affect a customer’s ability to pay. In circumstances where the Company is aware of a specific customer’s inability to
meet its financial obligations to the Company, a specific allowance for bad debts is estimated and recorded which
reduces the recognized receivable to the estimated amount that the Company believes will ultimately be collected. In
addition to specific customer identification of potential bad debts, bad debt charges are recorded based on the Company’s
recent past loss history and an overall assessment of past due trade accounts receivable amounts outstanding.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost (which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis) or
market. Adjustments to reduce the cost of inventory to its net realizable value, if required, are made for estimated excess,
obsolescence or impaired balances. Factors influencing these adjustments include declines in demand, technological
changes, product life cycle and development plans, component cost trends, product pricing, physical deterioration and
quality issues. If actual factors are less favorable than those projected by us, additional inventory write-downs may be
required.

Internal-Use Software Development Costs

The Company capitalizes material software development costs for internal use pursuant to Statement of Position No. 98-
1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.”

Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets

Impairment of Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates goodwill, at a minimum, on an annual basis and whenever events and changes in circumstances
suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment testing
in the fourth fiscal quarter of each year. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment utilizing a two-step process. First,
impairment of goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level by comparing the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including
goodwill, to the fair value of the reporting unit. The fair values of the reporting units are estimated using a discounted
cash flow approach. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second step is performed to
measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. In step two, the implied fair value of goodwill is calculated as the excess
of the fair value of a reporting unit over the fair values assigned to its assets and liabilities. If the implied fair value of
goodwill is less than the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill, the difference is recognized as an impairment
loss.

Depreciation and amortization of the Company’s intangible assets and other long-lived assets is provided using the
straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, reflecting the pattern of economic benefits associated with these
assets. Changes in circumstances such as technological advances, changes to the Company’s business model, or changes
in the capital strategy could result in the actual useful lives differing from initial estimates. In those cases where the
Company determines that the useful life of an asset should be revised, the Company will depreciate the net book value in
excess of the estimated residual value over its revised remaining useful life. These assets are evaluated for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable.
The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about expected future operating
performance and may differ from actual cash flows. The assets evaluated for impairment are grouped with other assets to
the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and
liabilities. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the
assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, shipment has occurred,
the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In instances where final acceptance of the
product is specified by the customer or is uncertain, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met.

Contracts and/or customer purchase orders are used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents
and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. The Company assesses whether the fee is fixed or
determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund
or adjustment. The Company assesses collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as
determined by credit checks and analyses, as well as the customer’s payment history.

Revenue for orders is not recognized until the product is shipped and title has transferred to the buyer. The Company
bears all costs and risks of loss or damage to the goods up to that point. The Company’s shipment terms for U.S. orders
and international orders fulfilled from the Company’s European distribution center typically provide that title passes to
the buyer upon delivery of the goods to the carrier named by the buyer at the named place or point. If no precise point is
indicated by the buyer, the Company may choose within the place or range stipulated where the carrier will take the
goods into carrier’s charge. Other shipment terms may provide that title passes to the buyer upon delivery of the goods to
the buyer. Shipping and handling costs are included in the cost of goods sold.

Revenue to distributors and resellers is recognized upon shipment, assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition
have been met. Distributors and resellers do not have a right of return.

Revenue from purchased extended warranty and support agreements is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of
the warranty/support period.

The Company presents revenue net of sales taxes and any similar assessments.

The Company applies Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” to products where the
embedded software is more than incidental to the functionality of the hardware. This determination requires significant
judgment including a consideration of factors such as marketing, research and development efforts and any post contract
support (PCS) relating to the embedded software.

The Company’s software arrangements generally consist of a perpetual license fee and PCS. The Company has
established vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value for the Company’s PCS contracts based on the
renewal rate. The remaining value of the software arrangement is allocated to the license fee using the residual
method. License revenue is primarily recognized when the software has been delivered and there are no remaining
obligations. Revenue from PCS is recognized ratably over the term of the PCS agreement.

The Company applies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 00-3, “Application of AICPA Statement of Position 97-
2 to Arrangements That Include the Right to Use Software Stored on Another Entity’s Hardware.” for hosted
arrangements which the customer does not have the contractual right to take possession of the software at any time
during the hosting period without incurring a significant penalty and it is not feasible for the customer to run the software
either on its own hardware or on a third-party’s hardware. Subscription revenue related to the Company’s hosted
arrangements is recognized ratably over the contract period. Upfront fees for the Company’s hosted solution primarily
consist of amounts for the in-vehicle enabling hardware device and peripherals, if any. For upfront fees relating to
proprietary hardware where the firmware is more than incidental to the functionality of the hardware in accordance with
SOP No. 97-2, the Company defers the upfront fees at installation and recognizes them ratably over the minimum service
contract period, generally one to five years. Product costs are also deferred and amortized over such period.

Warranty

The Company accrues for warranty costs as part of its cost of sales based on associated material product costs, technical
support labor costs, and costs incurred by third parties performing work on the Company’s behalf. The Company’s
expected future cost is primarily estimated based upon historical trends in the volume of product returns within the
warranty period and the cost to repair or replace the equipment. The products sold are generally covered by a warranty
for periods ranging from 90 days to three years, and in some instances up to 5.5 years.

While the Company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and
evaluating the quality of component suppliers, its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage,
and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Should actual product failure rates, material usage, or
service delivery costs differ from the estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty accrual and related costs may be
required.

Changes in the Company’s product warranty liability during the fiscal years ended January 2, 2009 and December 28,
2007, are as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended

(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

Beginning balance ........................................................
Acquired warranties .....................................................
Accruals for warranties issued ......................................
Changes in estimates ....................................................
Warranty settlements (in cash or in kind) .....................
Ending Balance.............................................................

10,806
930
22,214
-
(20,618)
13,332

8,607
67
15,883
-
(13,751)
10,806

Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others

In the normal course of business to facilitate sales of its products, the Company indemnifies other parties, including
customers, lessors, and parties to other transactions with the Company, with respect to certain matters. The Company has
agreed to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations or covenants, or out of
intellectual property infringement or other claims made against certain parties. These agreements may limit the time
within which an indemnification claim can be made and the amount of the claim. In addition, the Company has entered
into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors, and the Company’s bylaws contain similar
indemnification obligations to the Company’s agents.

It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to the limited
history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement.
Historically, payments made by the Company under these agreements were not material and no liabilities have been
recorded for these obligations on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007.

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses all advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense was approximately $22.6 million, $21.2
million, and $16.1 million, in fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. Cost of software developed for external sale
subsequent to reaching technical feasibility were not significant and were expensed as incurred. The Company received
third party funding of approximately $9.2 million, $8.5 million, and $7.8 million in fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively. The Company offsets research and development expense with any third party funding received. The
Company retains the rights to any technology developed under such arrangements.

Stock-Based Compensation

In fiscal 2006 the Company adopted, and currently accounts for stock-based compensation under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No 123(R), “Share Based Payment” (SFAS 123(R)). The following table summarizes
stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, related to employee stock-based compensation included in the
Consolidated Statements of Income in accordance with SFAS 123(R).

Fiscal Years Ended

(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,

December 29,

2007

2006

Cost of sales .............................................................. $

1,920

1,733

1,173

Research and development ........................................
Sales and marketing ..................................................
General and administrative ........................................
Total operating expenses ...........................................

Total stock-based compensation expense ..................
Tax benefit (1) ...........................................................
Total stock-based compensation expense, net of tax . $

3,489
3,993
6,764
14,246

16,166
(2,636)
13,530

3,573
3,891
5,819
13,283

15,016
(1,857)
13,159

2,554
2,815
6,029
11,398

12,571
(1,185)
11,386

(1) Tax benefit related to U.S. incentive and non-qualified stock options, employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) and
restricted stock units, applying a Federal statutory and State (Federal effected) tax rate for the year ended January 2,
2009 and December 28, 2007.

Options

Stock option expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income is based on the value of the portion of share-
based payment awards that is expected to vest during the period and is net of estimated forfeitures. For fiscal 2008, 2007
and 2006 the stock option expense includes compensation expense for stock options granted prior to, but not yet vested
as of December 30, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123 and
compensation expense for the stock options granted subsequent to December 30, 2005 based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the
Company changed its method of attributing the value of stock options to expense from the accelerated multiple-option
approach to the straight-line single option method. Compensation expense for all stock options granted on or prior to
December 30, 2005 will continue to be recognized using the accelerated multiple-option approach while compensation
expense for all stock options granted subsequent to December 30, 2005 is recognized using the straight-line single-option
method.

For options granted prior to October 1, 2005, the fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For stock options granted on or after October 1, 2005, the fair value of each award
is estimated on the date of grant using a binomial valuation model. Similar to the Black-Scholes model, the binomial
model takes into account variables such as volatility, dividend yield rate, and risk free interest rate. In addition, the
binomial model incorporates actual option-pricing behavior and changes in volatility over the option’s contractual term.

Under the binomial model, the weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during fiscal years 2008,
2007 and 2006 were $8.80, $12.37 and $8.04, respectively. For options granted for the three years ending January 2,
2009, the following weighted-average assumptions were used:

Fiscal Years Ended
Expected dividend yield .......................
Expected stock price volatility .............
Risk free interest rate ...........................
Expected life of options after vesting ...

45%
2.50%

2007

37%
4.20%

1.3 years

2006

-
42%
4.80%
1.3 years

January 2,
2009

December 28,

December 29,

Expected Dividend Yield – The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of
dividend payouts.

Expected Stock Price Volatility – The Company’s computation of expected volatility is based on a combination
of implied volatilities from traded options on the Company’s stock and historical volatility. The Company used
implied and historical volatility as the combination was more representative of future stock price trends than
historical volatility alone.

Expected Risk Free Interest Rate – The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect
at the time of grant for the expected term of the option.

Expected Life Of Option – The Company’s expected term represents the period that the Company’s stock
options are expected to be outstanding and was determined based on historical experience of similar stock
options with consideration to the contractual terms of the stock options, vesting schedules and expectations of
future employee behavior.

Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock units are converted into shares of Trimble common stock upon vesting on a one-for-one basis. Vesting
of restricted stock units is subject to the employee’s continuing service to the Company. The compensation expense
related to these awards was determined using the fair value of Trimble’s common stock on the date of grant, and the
expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Restricted stock units typically vest at the end of
three years.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, rights to purchase shares are generally granted during the second and fourth
quarter of each year. The fair value of rights granted under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan was estimated at the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The estimated weighted average value of rights granted under the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan during fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $8.30, $7.54 and $5.16, respectively. The
fair value of rights granted during 2008, 2007 and 2006 was estimated at the date of grant using the following weighted-
average assumptions:

Fiscal Years Ended
Expected dividend yield ........................
Expected stock price volatility ..............
Risk free interest rate ............................
Expected life of purchase ......................

January 2,
2009

December 28,

December 29,

2007

2006

-
44.0%
2.70%

-
36.5%
4.90%

0.5 years

-
35.5%
4.80%
0.6years

Expected Dividend Yield – The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of
dividend payouts.

Expected Stock Price Volatility – The Company’s computation of expected volatility is based on implied
volatilities from traded options on the Company’s stock. The Company used implied volatility because it is
representative of future stock price trends during the purchase period.

Expected Risk Free Interest Rate – The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at
the time of grant for the expected term of the purchase period.

Expected Life Of Purchase – The Company’s expected life of the purchase is based on the term of the offering
period of the purchase plan.

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment, net is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of property and equipment owned
is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives or the lease terms. Useful lives
include a range from two to six years for machinery and equipment, five years for furniture and fixtures, two to five years
for computer equipment and software, and the life of the lease for leasehold improvements. The costs of repairs and
maintenance are expensed when incurred, while expenditures for refurbishments and improvements that significantly add to
the productive capacity or extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized. Depreciation expense was $19.0 million in fiscal
2008, $17.2 million in fiscal 2007 and $13.5 million in fiscal 2006.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to minimize the short-term impact of foreign currency
fluctuations on certain trade and inter-company receivables and payables, primarily denominated in Australian, Canadian,
Japanese, New Zealand, South African and Swedish currencies, the Euro, and the British pound. These contracts reduce the
exposure to fluctuations in exchange rate movements as the gains and losses associated with foreign currency balances are
generally offset with the gains and losses on the forward contracts. These instruments are marked to market through
earnings every period and generally range from one to three months in original maturity. We do not enter into foreign
exchange forward contracts for trading purposes.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method whereby deferred tax assets or liability account balances are
calculated at the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates in effect for the year in which the differences are
expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets if
it is more likely than not such assets will not be realized. The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No.
48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48), on December 30, 2006. See Note 12 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information.

Computation of Earnings Per Share

The number of shares used in the calculation of basic earnings per share represents the weighted average common shares
outstanding during the period and excludes any dilutive effects of options, non-vested restricted stock units and restricted
stock awards, warrants, and convertible securities. The dilutive effects of options, non-vested restricted stock units and
restricted stock awards, warrants, and convertible securities are included in diluted earnings per share.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, "Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)." SFAS 158 requires companies to
recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined benefit post-retirement plan as an asset or liability in its
balance sheet, recognize as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, amounts accumulated at
the date of adoption due to delayed recognition of actuarial gains and losses, prior service costs and credits, and transition
assets and obligations, and provide additional disclosures. SFAS 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2006. On December 28, 2006, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158. The effect of
adopting these provisions of SFAS 158 on the Company’s financial condition at December 29, 2006, December 28, 2007
and January 2, 2009 has been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. SFAS 158 also requires
companies to measure the funded status of the plan as of the date of its fiscal year-end, with limited exceptions, effective for
56

fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. This provision of SFAS 158 was effective for the fiscal year ended 2008. The
adoption of SFAS No. 158 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash
flows. See Note 15 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which clarifies the definition of fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value within GAAP and expands the disclosures regarding fair value
measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2 deferring the effective date of
SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years for
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
nonrecurring basis. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 in its first quarter of fiscal 2008, except for those items
specifically deferred under FSP No. FAS 157-2. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact, nor does
the Company expect that the full adoption in fiscal 2009 will have a material impact, on the Company’s financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,
including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” SFAS No. 159 allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair
value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities under an instrument-by-
instrument election. Subsequent measurements for the financial assets and liabilities an entity elects to fair value will be
recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 159 also establishes additional disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 159 became effective
for the Company at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal 2008. The Company did not elect the fair value option for any
of its financial assets or liabilities. However, the Company may decide to elect the fair value option on new items in the
future. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations”. SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles
and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired,
the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired
in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase. SFAS No. 141(R) also sets forth the disclosures required to
be made in the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No.
141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Accordingly, the Company will adopt this standard in
fiscal 2009. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) on its financial position,
results of operations and cash flows, which will be largely dependent on the size and nature of the business combinations
subject to this statement. When SFAS 141(R) becomes effective, any tax related adjustments associated with acquisition
that closed prior to January 3, 2009 (and after the measurement period) will be recorded through income tax expense,
whereas the current accounting treatment (under SFAS 141) would require any adjustment to be recognized through the
purchase price.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an
amendment of ARB No. 51”. SFAS 160 will change the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be
recharacterized as non-controlling interests (NCI) and classified as a component of equity. This new consolidation method
will significantly change the accounting for transactions with minority interest holders. SFAS 160 requires retroactive
adoption of the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests. All other requirements of SFAS 160
shall be applied prospectively. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and, as such, the
Company will adopt this standard in fiscal 2009. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the adoption of SFAS
No. 160 on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows, which will be largely dependent on the size and
nature of the non-controlling interests subject to this statement.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities -
An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”, which requires enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity
uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133
and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.

In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. This
Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting principles to be used in the

preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). This Statement shall be effective November
16, 2008. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.

NOTE 3: EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following data shows the amounts used in computing earnings per share and the effect on the weighted-average
number of shares of potentially dilutive common stock.

Fiscal Years Ended

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Numerator:

January 2,
2009

December 28, December 29,

2007

2006

Income available to common shareholders: .................................................. $

141,472 $ 117,374 $

103,658

Denominator:

Weighted average number of common shares used in basic earnings per share
Effect of dilutive securities (using treasury stock method):

120,714

119,280

110,044

Common stock options and restricted stock units ......................................
Common stock warrants ............................................................................

3,516
5

4,907
223

5,134
894

Weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common

shares used in diluted earnings per share ......................................................

124,235

124,410

116,072

Basic earnings per share ................................................................................... $
Diluted earnings per share ................................................................................ $

1.17 $
1.14 $

0.98 $
0.94 $

0.94
0.89

For fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006 the Company excluded 2.2 million shares, 514,311 shares and 323,035 shares of
outstanding stock options, respectively, from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices of
these stock options were greater than or equal to the average market value of the common shares during the respective
periods. Inclusion of these shares would be antidilutive. These options could be included in the calculation in the future
if the average market value of the common shares increases and is greater than the exercise price of these options.

NOTE 4: BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

@Road, Inc.

On December 10, 2006, the Company and @Road, Inc. (@Road) entered into a definitive merger agreement. The
acquisition became effective on February 16, 2007. @Road is a global provider of solutions designed to automate the
management of mobile resources and to optimize the service delivery process for customers across a variety of
industries. The acquisition of @Road has expanded the Company’s investment and reinforces the existing growth
strategy for its Mobile Solutions segment. @Road’s results of operations since February 17, 2007 have been included in
the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income within the Mobile Solutions business segment.

Purchase Price

Under the terms of the agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of @Road common stock for $7.50
per share. The Company elected to issue $2.50 per share of the consideration in the form of the Company’s common stock
(Common Stock) to be based upon the five-day average closing price of the Company’s shares six trading days prior to the
closing of the transaction and the remaining $5.00 per share consideration was paid in cash. Further, each share of Series A-
1 and Series A-2 Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, of @Road was converted into the right to receive
an amount in cash equal to $100.00 plus all declared or accumulated but unpaid dividends with respect to such shares
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger and each share of Series B-1 and B-2 Redeemable
Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, of @Road was converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to
$831.39 plus all declared or accumulated but unpaid dividends with respect to such shares as of immediately prior to the
58

effective time of the merger. In addition, all @Road vested stock options were terminated and the holders of each such
options were entitled to receive the excess, if any, of the aggregate consideration over the exercise price. At the effective
time of the merger, all unvested @Road stock options with an exercise price in excess of $7.50 were terminated and all
unvested stock options that had exercise prices of $7.50 or less were assumed by the Company.

Concurrent with the merger, the Company amended its existing $200 million unsecured revolving credit agreement with
a syndicate of 11 banks with The Bank of Nova Scotia as the administrative agent (the 2007 Credit Facility) and incurred
a five-year term loan under the 2007 Credit Facility. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information.

The Company paid approximately $327.4 million in cash from debt and existing cash, and issued approximately
5.9 million shares of the Company’s common stock based on an exchange ratio of 0.0893 shares of the Company’s
common stock for each outstanding share of @Road common stock as of February 16, 2007. The common stock issued
had a fair value of $161.9 million and was valued using the average closing price of the Company’s common stock of
$27.69 over a range of two trading days (February 14, 2007 through February 15, 2007) prior to, and including, the close
date (February 16, 2007) of the transaction, which is also the date that the amount of the Company’s shares to be issued
in accordance with the merger agreement was settled. The total purchase price was estimated as follows (in thousands):

Cash consideration ......................................... $
Common stock consideration .........................
Merger costs * ................................................
Total purchase price ....................................... $

327,370
161,947
5,712
495,029

* Merger costs consist of legal, advisory, accounting and administrative fees.

Purchase Price Allocation

In accordance with SFAS 141, "Business Combinations,” the total purchase price was allocated to @Road net tangible
assets, identifiable intangible assets and in-process research and development based upon their estimated fair values as of
February 16, 2007. The excess purchase price over the net tangible, identifiable intangible assets and in-process research
and development was recorded as goodwill.

The total purchase price has been allocated as follows (in thousands):

Value to be allocated to assets, based upon merger consideration ..................... $
Less: value of @Road’s assets acquired:

495,029

Net tangible assets acquired..........................................................................

137,492

Amortizable intangibles assets:

Developed product technology .................................................................
Customer relationships .............................................................................
Trademarks and tradenames .....................................................................
Subtotal .....................................................................................................

In-process research and development ...........................................................
Deferred tax liability .....................................................................................

66,600
75,300
5,200
147,100

2,100
(56,855)

Goodwill ................................................................................................... $

265,192

Net Tangible Assets

(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents ............................ $
Accounts receivable, net ...............................
Other receivables ..........................................
Inventories, net .............................................
Other current assets ......................................
Property and equipment, net .........................
Deferred income taxes ..................................
Other non-current assets ...............................

As of
February 16,
2007

74,729
14,255
8,774
15,272
12,627
5,854
40,435
7,935

Total assets acquired .................................... $

179,881

Accounts payable .........................................
Deferred revenue ..........................................
Other current liabilities .................................

19,285
7,365
15,739

Total liabilities assumed ............................... $

42,389

Total net assets acquired ............................... $

137,492

The Company reviewed and adjusted @Road's net tangible assets and liabilities to fair value, as necessary, as of
February 16, 2007, including the following adjustments:

Fixed assets – the Company decreased @Road's historical value of fixed assets by $2.1 million to adjust fixed assets to
an amount equivalent to fair value.

Deferred revenue and cost of sales – the Company reduced @Road's historical value of deferred revenue by $39.6
million to adjust deferred revenue to the fair value of the direct cost associated with servicing the underlying obligation
plus a reasonable margin. @Road’s deferred revenue balance consists of upfront payments of its hosted product, licensed
product, extended warranty and maintenance. The Company reduced @Road's historical value of deferred product cost
by $47.1 million to adjust deferred product cost to the asset's underlying fair value. The deferred product costs
adjustment to fair value related to deferral of cost of sales of hardware that have shipped, resulting in no fair value
relating to the associated deferred product costs.

Other receivables and non-current assets – Other receivables and non-current assets were increased by $15.4 million to
adjust for the fair value of future cash collections from customer contracts assumed for products delivered prior to the
acquisition date. As the products were delivered prior to the acquisition date, revenue is not recognizable in the
Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

Intangible Assets

Developed product technology, which is comprised of products that have reached technological feasibility, includes
products in @Road's current product offerings. @Road's technology includes hardware, software and services that serve
the mobile resource management market internationally. The Company expects to amortize the developed and core
technology over a weighted average estimated life of seven years.

Customer relationships represent the value placed on @Road’s distribution channels and end users. The Company
expects to amortize the fair value of these assets over a weighted average estimated life of seven years.

Trademarks and trade names represent the value placed on the @Road brand and recognition in the mobile resource
management market. The Company expects to amortize the fair value of these assets over a weighted average estimated
life of eight years.

In-process Research and Development

The Company recorded an expense of $2.1 million relating to in-process research and development projects in @Road’s
license business. In-process research and development represents incomplete @Road research and development projects
that had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use as of the consummation of the merger.

Goodwill

The excess purchase price over the net tangible, identifiable intangible assets and in-process research and development was
recorded as goodwill. The goodwill was attributed to the premium paid for the opportunity to expand and better serve the
global mobile resource management market and achieve greater long-term growth opportunities than either company had
operating alone. The Company believes these opportunities could include accelerating the rate at which products are
brought to market and increasing the diversity and global reach of those products. In addition, the Company expects that the
combined companies may be able to obtain greater operating leverage by reducing costs in areas of redundancy. Of the
total $265.2 million assigned to goodwill, approximately $6.7 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Restructuring

Liabilities related to restructuring @Road's operations that meet the requirements of EITF 95-3, “Recognition of
Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination,” were recorded as adjustments to the purchase price
and an increase in goodwill. Liabilities related to restructuring the Company's operations were recorded as expense in the
Company's Consolidated Statements of Income in the period that the costs were incurred.

Deferred Income Tax Assets/Liabilities

The Company recognized $56.9 million in net deferred tax liabilities for the tax effects of differences between assigned
values in the purchase price and the tax bases of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

@Road Stock Options Assumed

In accordance with the merger agreement, the Company assumed all @Road unvested stock options that had exercise
prices of $7.50 or less. The Company issued approximately 795,000 stock options based on an exchange ratio of
0.268 shares of the Company’s common stock for each unvested stock option with exercise prices of $7.50 or less as of
February 16, 2007. The fair value of these assumed options was determined to be $10.1 million which will be expensed
over the remaining vesting terms of the assumed options which is approximately three to four years. The assumed
options were valued using the binomial model similar to previously granted Trimble stock options.

Pro-Forma Results

The following table presents pro-forma results of operations of the Company and @Road, as if the companies had been
combined as of December 31, 2005. The unaudited pro-forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of
results that would have occurred had the acquisition taken place on December 31, 2005 or of future results. Included in
the pro-forma results are fair value adjustments based on the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of
the acquisition date of February 16, 2007 and adjustments for interest expense related to debt and stock options assumed
as part of the merger consideration.

The Company excluded the effect of non-recurring items for both periods presented as the impact is short-term in nature.
The pro-forma information is as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended

December 28,
2007 (a)

December 29,
2006 (b)

(in thousands, except per share data)
Pro-forma revenue ......................................... $
Pro-forma net income ....................................
Pro-forma basic net income per share ............ $
Pro-forma diluted net income per share ......... $

1,239,319
114,835
0.96
0.92

$
$

1,017,852
69,959
0.60
0.57

(a) The pro-forma results of operations represent the Company’s results for fiscal 2007 together with @Road’s
historical results through the acquisition date of February 16, 2007 as though they had been combined as of
December 31, 2005. Pro-forma adjustments have been made based on the fair values of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as of February 16, 2007. Pro-forma revenue includes a $2.8 million increase due to the timing of
recognizing deferred revenue write-downs and customer contracts where the product was delivered prior to the
acquisition date. Pro-forma net income includes a $0.7 million increase due to the timing of recognizing revenue
write-downs and related deferred cost of sales write-downs, amortization of intangible assets related to the
acquisition of $2.2 million, and interest expense for debt used to purchase @Road of $1.4 million. The year to date
amounts provided herein include adjustments to previously filed pro-forma numbers in the Company’s 10-Q’s.

(b) The pro-forma results of operations represent the Company’s results for fiscal 2006 together with @Road’s
historical results had they been combined as of December 31, 2005. Pro-forma adjustments have been made based
on the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date of February 16, 2007. Pro-
forma revenue for fiscal 2006 includes a $22.0 million decrease due to deferred revenue write-downs and customer
contracts for which the product was delivered prior to the acquisition date. Pro-forma net income for fiscal 2006
includes revenue write-downs and related deferred cost of sales write-downs of $3.1 million, amortization of
intangible assets related to the acquisition of $18.3 million, and interest expense for debt used to purchase @Road of
$11.2 million.

Other Acquisitions

The following is a summary of business combinations other than @Road made by the Company during fiscal 2008, 2007
and 2006:

Acquisition

Primary Service or Product

Operating
Segment

Acquisition

Date

Hydraulic and electronic controls for the agriculture

Field Solutions

December 3, 2008

Rawson Control
Systems
FastMap
and GeoSite

Callidus Precision
Systems Assets
Toposys

equipment industry

Field-based software suite for GIS and software
solution for land surveyors and construction
professionals

3D laser scanning solutions

Aerial data collection systems comprised of LiDAR

and metric cameras

TruCount

Air and electric clutches that automate individual

planter row shut-off

RolleiMetric

Metric camera systems for aerial imaging and

terrestrial close range photogrammetry

SECO

Accessories for the geomatics, surveying, mapping,

Géo-3D

Roadside infrastructure asset inventory solutions

and construction industries

Crain Enterprises

Accessories for the geomatics, surveying, mapping,

and construction industries

Office and field software solutions for the cadastral

HHK Datentechnik
GmbH
UtilityCenter
Ingenieurbüro
Breining GmbH
Inpho GmbH

survey market

Field service management software for utilities
Office and field software solutions for the cadastral

Photogrammetry and digital surface modeling

software for aerial surveying, mapping and remote
sensing applications

mapping solutions

Enterprise field service management and mobile

Desktop software tools

Real-time, interactive 3D intelligence software

Spacient
Technologies, Inc.
Meridian Project
Systems, Inc.
XYZ Solutions,
Inc.
Visual Statement,
Inc.
Intransix
BitWyse Solutions,
Inc.
Eleven
Technology, Inc.
Quantm
International, Inc.
XYZs of GPS, Inc. Real-time Global Navigation Satellite System

Mobile GPS applications
Engineering and construction information

Transportation route optimization solution

Mobile application software

management software

Advanced Public
Safety, Inc.

Mobile and handheld software for public safety

Field Solutions

and
Engineering &
Construction
Engineering &
Construction
Engineering &
Construction
Field Solutions

Engineering &
Construction
Engineering &
Construction
Engineering &
Construction
Engineering &
Construction
Engineering &
Construction
Field Solutions
Engineering &
Construction
Engineering &
Construction

November 28, 2008

November 13, 2008

October 30, 2008

October 20, 2008

July 29, 2008

January 22, 2008

January 8, 2008

December 19, 2007

November 8, 2007
September 19, 2007

February 13, 2007

Field Solutions

November 21, 2006

Construction
Engineering &
Construction
Mobile Solutions

October 27, 2006

October 11, 2006

Advanced Devices April 21, 2006
Engineering &
Construction
Mobile Solutions

April 28, 2006

May 1, 2006

Engineering &
Construction
Engineering &
Construction
Mobile Solutions

April 5, 2006

February 26, 2006

December 29, 2006

Enterprise project management and lifecycle software Engineering &

November 7, 2006

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the operating results of each of these businesses from the date of
acquisition. Pro-forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects of each of these acquisitions
were not material to the Company’s results.

The total purchase consideration for each of the above acquisitions was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition. The fair value of intangible assets acquired is
generally determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis. Acquisition costs directly related to the acquisitions were
capitalized.

At the date of each acquisition, the projects associated with in-process research and development (IPR&D) efforts had
not yet reached technological feasibility and the research and development in process had no alternative future uses.
Accordingly, the value assigned to these IPR&D amounts were charged to expense on the respective acquisition date of
each of the acquired companies. The Company recorded IPR&D expense of $1.9 million relating to acquisitions made in
fiscal 2006. The IPR&D of $2.1 million recorded during fiscal 2007 related entirely to the acquisition of @Road. There
was no IPR&D associated with acquisitions in fiscal 2008.

The following table summarizes the Company’s business combinations completed during fiscal years 2008, 2007 and
2006 other than @Road (in thousands):

Fiscal Years Ended

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

December 29,
2006

Purchase price ................................................... $
Acquisition costs * ............................................
Total purchase price ................................... $

99,948
2,623
102,571

Purchase price allocation:

Fair value of net assets acquired .................... $
Identified intangible assets .............................
In-process research and development ............
Deferred tax liability ......................................
Goodwill ........................................................
Total ........................................................... $

7,238
50,242
-
(3,426)
48,517
102,571

49,311
956
50,267

9,504
19,937
-
(2,763)
23,589
50,267

114,442
2,650
117,092

7,960
51,613
1,930
(14,723)
70,312
117,092

* Acquisition costs consist of legal, advisory, and accounting fees as well as $0.4 million of restructuring related
liabilities in fiscal 2008.

None of the amounts assigned to goodwill above are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Certain acquisitions include additional earn-out cash payments based on future revenue derived from existing products
and other product milestones. These earn-out payments are considered additional purchase price consideration. Earn-out
cash payments made for fiscal 2008, fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 were $7.2 million, $11.8 million and $4.5 million
respectively. Earn-outs and changes in purchase price allocation estimates were recorded as purchase price adjustments
and goodwill adjustments. Acquisitions made by the Company have additional potential earn-out cash payments in
excess of that recorded on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet not to exceed approximately $44.7 million.

Intangible Assets

The following tables present details of the Company’s total intangible assets:

January 2, 2009

Gross

(in thousands)
Developed product technology ..................................... $ 188,391
20,254
Trade names and trademarks ........................................
124,596
Customer relationships .................................................
37,913
Distribution rights and other intellectual properties (*)
$ 371,154

(78,867) $
(13,100)
(40,263)
(10,023)
(142,253) $

Amount

109,524
7,154
84,333
27,890
228,901

Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net Carrying

(*) Included within Other intellectual properties is a $25.0 million distribution right that the Company bought from
Caterpillar, a related party, during fiscal 2008. The fair value of the distribution right was estimated using a discounted
cash flow analysis. The distribution right will be amortized over its estimated economic life of eight years. Since the
distribution right became effective at year end, there is no accumulated amortization recorded as of January 2, 2009.

(in thousands)
Developed product technology ................................
Trade names and trademarks ...................................
Customer relationships ............................................
Distribution rights and other intellectual properties

December 28, 2007

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net Carrying

Amount

157,394
19,192
110,802
13,479
300,867

(58,273)
(12,490)
(24,435)
(7,892)
(103,090)

99,121
6,702
86,367
5,587
197,777

The weighted-average amortization period is six years for developed product technology, eight years for trade names and
trademarks, seven years for customer relationships and seven years for distribution rights and other intellectual properties.

The following table presents details of the amortization expense of purchased and other intangible assets as reported in
the Consolidated Statements of Income:

Fiscal Years Ended

(in thousands)

Reported as:

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

December 29,
2006

Cost of sales ................................................... $
Operating expenses ........................................
Total ........................................................... $

22,690
22,376
45,066

19,778
18,966
38,744

5,353
7,906
13,259

The estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets as of January 2, 2009, is as follows (in thousands):

2009 .................................................................. $
2010 ..................................................................
2011 ..................................................................
2012 ..................................................................
2013 ..................................................................
Thereafter .........................................................
Total .................................................................. $

50,329
48,164
43,474
34,727
31,146
21,061
228,901

Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for fiscal 2008 are as follows (in thousands):

Engineering
and
Construction

Field
Solutions

Mobile
Solutions

Advanced
Devices

Total

Balance as of December 28, 2007 ................. $ 317,886 $
Additions due to acquisitions ........................
Purchase price adjustments ...........................
Foreign currency translation adjustments .....
Balance as of January 2, 2009 ...................... $ 363,908 $

44,999
15,280
(14,257)

5,224 $ 337,661 $
3,518
1,909
-

-
(4,675)
(4,265)

10,651 $ 328,721 $

-
-

15,079 $ 675,850
48,517
12,514
(2,788)
(21,310)
12,291 $ 715,571

The purchase price adjustments relate entirely to business acquisitions prior to fiscal 2008. Total purchase price
adjustments of $12.5 million recorded during fiscal 2008 are comprised of earn-out payments of $7.2 million, tax
adjustments of $4.4 million, and $0.9 million for changes in purchase price allocation estimates.

NOTE 5: JOINT VENTURES

Caterpillar Trimble Control Technologies Joint Venture

On April 1, 2002, Caterpillar Trimble Control Technologies LLC (CTCT), a joint venture formed by the Company and
Caterpillar began operations. CTCT develops advanced electronic guidance and control products for earth moving
machines in the construction and mining industries. The joint venture is 50% owned by the Company and 50% owned by
Caterpillar, with equal voting rights. The joint venture is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Under the
equity method, the Company’s share of profits and losses are included in Income from joint ventures in the Non-
operating income, net section of the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company recorded a profit of $8.0 million,
$7.8 million and $5.7 million as its proportionate share of CTCT net income (loss) in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. During fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, dividends received from CTCT, amounted to $10.5 million, $2.3
million and $2.0 million, and were recorded against Other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The
carrying amount of the investment in CTCT was $7.0 million at January 2, 2009 and $9.6 million at December 28, 2007,
and is included in Other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company acts as a contract manufacturer for CTCT. Products are manufactured based on orders received from
CTCT and are sold at direct cost plus a mark-up for the Company’s overhead costs to CTCT. CTCT then resells products
at cost plus a mark-up in consideration for CTCT’s research and development efforts to both Caterpillar and to the
Company for sales through their respective distribution channels. Generally, the Company sells products through its
after-market dealer channel, and Caterpillar sells products for factory and dealer installation. CTCT does not have net
inventory on its balance sheet in that the resale of products to Caterpillar and the Company occur simultaneously when
the products are purchased from the Company. In fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded $11.7 million,
$11.5 million and $8.4 million of revenue, respectively, and $10.5 million, $10.3 million and $7.3 million of cost of
sales, respectively, for the manufacturing of products sold by the Company to CTCT and then sold through the
Caterpillar distribution channel. In addition, in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded $21.4 million, $25.1
million and $19.5 million in net cost of sales for the manufacturing of products sold by the Company to CTCT and then
repurchased by the Company upon sale through the Company’s distribution channel.

In addition, the Company received reimbursement of employee-related costs from CTCT for company employees
dedicated to CTCT or performance of work for CTCT totaling $13.6 million, $13.7 million and $13.5 million for fiscal
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The reimbursements were offset against operating expense.

At January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007, the Company had amounts due to and from CTCT. Receivables and
payables to CTCT are settled individually with terms comparable to other non-related parties. The amounts due to and
from CTCT are presented on a gross basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At January 2, 2009 and December 28,
2007, the receivables from CTCT were $4.1 million and $5.6 million, respectively, and are included within Accounts
receivable, net, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of the same dates, the payables due to CTCT were $3.1million
and $5.2 million, respectively, and are included within Accounts payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Nikon-Trimble Joint Venture

On March 28, 2003, Nikon-Trimble Co., Ltd (Nikon-Trimble), a joint venture was formed by the Company and Nikon
Corporation. The joint venture began operations in July 2003 and is 50% owned by the Company and 50% owned by
Nikon, with equal voting rights. It focuses on the design and manufacture of surveying instruments including mechanical
total stations and related products.

The joint venture is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the Company’s
share of profits and losses are included in Income from joint ventures in the Non-operating income (expense) section of
the Consolidated Statements of Income. In fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded a profit of $23,000, $0.6
million and $1.3 million, respectively, as its proportionate share of Nikon-Trimble net income (loss). During fiscal 2008,
2007 and 2006, dividends received from Nikon-Trimble, amounted to $0.2 million, $0.6 million and $0.3 million, and
were recorded against Other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying amount of the
investment in Nikon-Trimble was approximately $13.9 million at January 2, 2009 and $13.4 million at December 28,
2007, and is included in Other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Nikon-Trimble is the distributor in Japan for Nikon and the Company’s products. The Company is the exclusive
distributor outside of Japan for Nikon branded survey products. For products sold by the Company to Nikon-Trimble,
revenue is recognized by the Company on a sell-through basis from Nikon-Trimble to the end customer. Profits from
these inter-company sales are eliminated.

The terms and conditions of the sales of products from the Company to Nikon-Trimble are comparable with those of the
standard distribution agreements which the Company maintains with its dealer channel and margins earned are similar to
those from third party dealers. Similarly, the purchases of product by the Company from Nikon-Trimble are made on
terms comparable with the arrangements which Nikon maintained with its international distribution channel prior to the
formation of the joint venture with the Company. The Company recorded $15.3 million, $12.6 million and $13.9 million
of revenue, and $11.0 million, $6.7 million and $6.6 million of cost of sales for the manufacturing of products sold by
the Company to Nikon-Trimble.

At January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007, the Company had amounts due to and from Nikon-Trimble. Receivables
and payables to Nikon-Trimble are settled individually with terms comparable to other non-related parties. The amounts
due to and from Nikon-Trimble are presented on a gross basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At January 2, 2009
and December 28, 2007, the amounts due from Nikon-Trimble were $2.0 million and $3.3 million, respectively, and are
included within Accounts receivable, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of the same dates, the amounts due to
Nikon-Trimble were $2.3 million and $5.7 million, respectively, and are included within Accounts payable on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.

VirtualSite Solutions Joint Venture

On October 3, 2008, VirtualSite Solutions (VSS), a joint venture formed by the Company and Caterpillar began
operations. The Company contributed $7.8 million in exchange for a 65% ownership and Caterpillar contributed $4.2
million for a 35% ownership in VSS. VSS develops software for fleet management and connected worksite solutions for
both Caterpillar and Trimble and in turn, sells software subscription services to Caterpillar and Trimble, which are sold
through Caterpillar's and the Company's respective distribution channels. For financial reporting purposes, VSS’s assets
and liabilities are consolidated with those of the Company, as are its results of operations, which are reported under the
Engineering and Construction segment. Caterpillar’s 35% interest is included in the overall Consolidated Financial
Statements as minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries.

NOTE 6: CERTAIN BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS

The following tables provide details of selected balance sheet items:

As of

(in thousands)
Inventories:

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

Raw materials ............................................ $
Work-in-process ........................................
Finished goods ...........................................
Total inventories, net ................................. $

71,319
5,551
84,023
160,893

63,465
9,267
70,286
143,018

Deferred costs of revenue are included within finished goods and were $15.4 million at January 2, 2009 and
$11.0 million at December 28, 2007.

As of

(in thousands)
Property and equipment, net:

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

Machinery and equipment .................................. $
Furniture and fixtures .........................................
Leasehold improvements ...................................
Buildings ............................................................
Land ...................................................................

Less accumulated depreciation ..........................

Total ............................................................... $

88,067 $
12,140
16,432
6,519
1,383
124,541
(74,366)
50,175 $

79,956
10,974
15,391
6,527
1,384
114,232
(62,788)
51,444

As of

(in thousands)
Other Non-Current Liabilities:

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

Deferred compensation ....................................... $
Pension ................................................................
Deferred rent .......................................................
Unrecognized tax benefits ...................................
Other non-current liabilities ................................
Total ................................................................. $

6,631 $
5,439
4,303
34,275
10,905
61,553 $

8,646
6,646
5,215
25,774
9,847
56,128

As of January 2, 2009, the Company has $34.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits included in Other non-current
liabilities that, if recognized, would favorably impact the effective income tax rate in future periods and interest and/or
penalties related to income tax matters.

NOTE 7: REPORTING SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Trimble is a designer and distributor of positioning products and applications enabled by GPS, optical, laser, and
wireless communications technology. The Company provides products for diverse applications in its targeted markets.

To achieve distribution, marketing, production, and technology advantages, the Company manages its operations in the
following four segments:

• Engineering and Construction — Consists of products currently used by survey and construction professionals in
the field for positioning, data collection, field computing, data management, and machine guidance and control.
The applications served include surveying, road, runway, construction, site preparation and building
construction.

• Field Solutions — Consists of products that provide solutions in a variety of agriculture and geographic
information systems (GIS) applications. In agriculture these include precise land leveling and machine guidance
systems. In GIS they include handheld devices and software that enable the collection of data on assets for a
variety of governmental and private entities.

• Mobile Solutions — Consists of products that enable end users to monitor and manage their mobile assets by
communicating location and activity-relevant information from the field to the office. Trimble offers a range of
products that address a number of sectors of this market including truck fleets, security, and public safety
vehicles.

• Advanced Devices — The various operations that comprise this segment were aggregated on the basis that no
single operation accounted for more than 10% of Trimble’s total revenue, operating income or assets. This
segment is comprised of the Component Technologies, Military and Advanced Systems, Applanix and Trimble
Outdoors businesses.

Trimble evaluates each of its segment's performance and allocates resources based on segment operating income from
operations before income taxes, and some corporate allocations. Trimble and each of its segments employ consistent
accounting policies.

The following table presents revenue, operating income (loss), and identifiable assets for the four segments. Operating
income (loss) is net revenue less operating expense, excluding general corporate expense, amortization of intangibles,
amortization of inventory step-up charges, in-process research and development expense, restructuring charges, non-
operating income (expense), and income taxes. The identifiable assets that Trimble's Chief Operating Decision Maker,
its Chief Executive Officer, views by segment are accounts receivable and inventories.

Fiscal Years Ended

January 2,
2009

December 28, December 29,

2007

2006

637,118
136,157

139,230
37,377

60,854
2,550

102,948
10,084

940,150
186,168

157,673 $
12,517

120,692 $
17,276

200,614 $
60,933

743,291 $
174,177

119,745 $
24,445

167,113 $
11,328

300,708 $
109,489

741,668 $
126,014

(in thousands)
Engineering & Construction
Revenue ............................................................................................................ $
Operating income ..............................................................................................
Field Solutions
Revenue ............................................................................................................ $
Operating income ..............................................................................................
Mobile Solutions
Revenue ............................................................................................................ $
Operating income ..............................................................................................
Advanced Devices
Revenue ............................................................................................................ $
Operating income ..............................................................................................
Total
Revenue ............................................................................................................ $ 1,329,234 $ 1,222,270 $
Operating income ..............................................................................................
264,903
Engineering & Construction
Accounts receivable .......................................................................................... $
Inventories ........................................................................................................
Goodwill ...........................................................................................................
Field Solutions
Accounts receivable .......................................................................................... $
Inventories ........................................................................................................
Goodwill ...........................................................................................................
Mobile Solutions
Accounts receivable .......................................................................................... $
Inventories ........................................................................................................
Goodwill ...........................................................................................................
Advanced Devices
Accounts receivable .......................................................................................... $
Inventories ........................................................................................................
Goodwill ...........................................................................................................
Total
Accounts receivable (1) .................................................................................... $
Inventories ........................................................................................................
Goodwill ...........................................................................................................

204,269 $
160,893
715,571

125,734 $
104,934
363,908

23,736 $
16,391
328,721

37,791 $
21,778
10,651

17,008 $
17,790
12,291

271,276

239,884
143,018
675,850

158,913
89,780
317,886

25,469
18,781
337,661

37,294
15,745
5,224

18,208
18,712
15,079

(1) As presented, accounts receivable represents trade receivables, net, which are specified between segments.

A reconciliation of the Company’s consolidated segment operating income to consolidated income before income taxes
is as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended

(in thousands)
Consolidated segment operating income ........................... $
Unallocated corporate expense ..........................................
Restructuring charges ........................................................
Amortization of purchased intangible assets .....................
In-process research and development ................................
Consolidated operating income .........................................
Non-operating expense, net ...............................................
Consolidated income before income taxes ........................ $

January 2,
2009

December 28,

December 29,

2007

2006

271,276
(36,284)
(4,641)
(44,891)
-
185,460
6,502
191,962

264,903
(42,914)
(3,025)
(38,585)
(2,112)
178,267
5,489
183,756

186,168
(35,798)
-
(13,074)
(1,930)
135,366
12,726
148,092

The geographic distribution of Trimble’s revenue and identifiable assets is summarized in the tables below. Other
foreign countries include Canada, and countries in South and Central America, the Middle East, and Africa. Revenue is
defined as revenue from external customers. Identifiable assets indicated in the table below exclude inter-company
receivables, investments in subsidiaries, goodwill, and intangibles assets.

Fiscal Years Ended

(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,

December 29,

2007

2006

Revenue (1):
646,734
United States .................................................................... $
333,436
Europe ..............................................................................
182,952
Asia Pacific ......................................................................
166,112
Other non-US countries ....................................................
Total consolidated revenue ............................................... $ 1,329,234

608,137
325,888
146,545
141,700
1,222,270

511,030
231,428
112,465
85,227
940,150

(1) Revenue attributed to countries based on the location of the customer.

Transfers between U.S. and non-U.S. geographic areas are made at prices based on total costs and contributions of the
supplying geographic area. The Company's subsidiaries in Asia have derived revenue from commissions from U.S.
operations in each of the periods presented. This commission revenue and expense is excluded from total revenue in the
preceding table. No single customer or country other than the United States accounted for 10% or more of Trimble's total
revenue in fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006.

As of

(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

Identifiable assets:
United States .........................................................................
Europe ...................................................................................
Asia Pacific and other non-US countries ...............................
Total identifiable assets .........................................................

441,947
179,350
42,649
663,946

381,755
217,422
36,167
635,344

NOTE 8: RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

Restructuring expense for the three years ended January 2, 2009 was as follows:

(in thousands)

2008

2007

2006

Severance and benefits ............... $

4,641

3,025

During fiscal 2008, restructuring expense of $4.6 million was related to decisions to streamline processes and reduce the
cost structure of the Company, with approximately 100 employees affected worldwide. Of the total restructuring
expense, $2.7 million is shown as a separate line within Operating expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements
of Income, and $1.9 million is included within Cost of sales. Additionally, $4.1 million is related to the Engineering and
Construction segment and $0.5 million is related to the Mobile Solutions segment. As a result of above decisions, the
Company expects restructuring activities in the Engineering and Construction segment to result in additional
restructuring expense totaling approximately $1.8 million through the first quarter of 2010.

During fiscal 2007, restructuring expense of $3.0 million was for charges associated with the Company’s acquisition of
@Road. The restructuring expense was related to the acceleration of vesting of employee stock options for certain
terminated @Road employees, of which $1.4 million was settled in cash and $1.6 million was recorded as Shareholders’
equity.

Restructuring costs associated with business combinations:
In addition to the restructuring expense in fiscal 2008, costs associated with exiting activities of companies the Company
acquired in fiscal 2008 was $0.4 million, consisting of severance and benefits costs. These costs were recognized as a
liability assumed in the purchase business combinations and were included in the allocation of the cost to acquisitions
and accordingly, resulted in an increase to goodwill rather than an expense in fiscal 2008. The Company also had $0.9
million in restructuring activity reversals related to costs associated with exiting activities of pre-merger @Road. The
reversals were primarily due to severance and benefits costs for employees whose positions were retained in a variety of
functions. The reversals were recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 as a reduction of the liability assumed in the
purchase business combination that had been included in the allocation of the cost to acquire @Road and, accordingly,
resulted in a decrease to goodwill rather than an expense reduction in fiscal 2008.

Restructuring liability:
The following table summarizes the restructuring activity for 2007 and 2008 (in thousands):

Balance as of December 30, 2006 ....................... $
Acquisition related ...........................................
Charges ............................................................
Payments ..........................................................
Adjustment .......................................................
Balance as of December 28, 2007 ....................... $
Acquisition related ...........................................
Charges ............................................................
Payments ..........................................................
Adjustment .......................................................
Balance as of January 2, 2009 ............................. $

744
3,547
3,025
(6,004)
14
1,326
355
4,641
(3,351)
(1,054)
1,917

NOTE 9: LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

As of
(in thousands)

Credit Facilities:

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

Term loan .......................................................... $
Revolving credit facility ....................................
Promissory notes and other ...................................
Total debt ..........................................................

-
151,000
588
151,588

Less current portion of long-term debt .................
Non-current portion ........................................... $

124
151,464

60,000
-
690
60,690

126
60,564

On July 28, 2005, the Company entered into a $200 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (the 2005 Credit
Facility) with a syndicate of 10 banks with The Bank of Nova Scotia as the administrative agent. On February 16, 2007,
the Company amended its existing $200 million unsecured revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of 11 banks with
The Bank of Nova Scotia as the administrative agent (the 2007 Credit Facility). Under the 2007 Credit Facility, the
Company exercised the option in the existing credit agreement to increase the availability under the revolving credit line
by $100 million, for an aggregate availability of up to $300 million, and extended the maturity date of the revolving
credit line by 18 months, from July 2010 to February 2012. Up to $25 million of the availability under the revolving
credit line may be used to issue letters of credit, and up to $20 million may be used for paying off other debts or loans.
The maximum leverage ratio under the 2007 Credit Facility is 3.00:1.00. The funds available under the new 2007 Credit
Facility may be used by the Company for acquisitions, stock repurchases, and general corporate purposes. As of August
20, 2008, the Company amended its 2007 Credit Facility to allow it to redeem, retire or purchase common stock of the
Company. In addition, the definition of the fixed charge was amended to exclude the impact of redemptions, retirements,
or purchases common stock of the Company from the fixed charges coverage ratio.

In addition, during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 the Company incurred a five-year term loan under the 2007 Credit
Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $100 million, which was repaid in full during fiscal 2008. As of January 2,
2009, the Company had an outstanding balance on the revolving credit line of $151.0 million.

The Company may borrow funds under the 2007 Credit Facility in U.S. Dollars or in certain other currencies, and
borrowings will bear interest, at the Company's option, at either: (i) a base rate, based on the administrative agent's prime
rate, plus a margin of between 0% and 0.125%, depending on the Company's leverage ratio as of its most recently ended
fiscal quarter, or (ii) a reserve-adjusted rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), Euro Interbank
Offered Rate (EURIBOR), Stockholm Interbank Offered Rate (STIBOR), or other agreed-upon rate, depending on the
currency borrowed, plus a margin of between 0.625% and 1.125%, depending on the Company's leverage ratio as of the
most recently ended fiscal quarter. The Company's obligations under the 2007 Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain
of the Company's domestic subsidiaries.

The 2007 Credit Facility contains customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants including, among other
requirements, negative covenants that restrict the Company's ability to dispose of assets, create liens, incur indebtedness,
repurchase stock, pay dividends, make acquisitions, make investments, enter into mergers and consolidations and make
capital expenditures, within certain limitations, and financial covenants that require the maintenance of leverage and
fixed charge coverage ratios. The 2007 Credit Facility contains events of default that include, among others, non-
payment of principal, interest or fees, breach of covenants, inaccuracy of representations and warranties, cross defaults to
certain other indebtedness, bankruptcy and insolvency events, material judgments, and events constituting a change of
control. Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default, interest on the obligations will accrue at
an increased rate and the lenders may accelerate the Company's obligations under the 2007 Credit Facility, however that
acceleration will be automatic in the case of bankruptcy and insolvency events of default. As of January 2, 2009 the
Company was in compliance with all financial debt covenants.

Notes Payable

As of January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007, the Company had notes payable totaling approximately $588,000 and
$690,000, respectively, consisting of government loans to foreign subsidiaries.

NOTE 10: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

On February 16, 2007, the Company acquired @Road and assumed the lease for its primary facility in Fremont,
California. The lease agreement has a five year term, commencing February 1, 2005 and ending May 16, 2010.

On January 13, 2006, the Company entered into a lease agreement for the lease of real property located in Westminster,
Colorado. The lease agreement has a seven year term, commencing June 1, 2006 and ending May 31, 2013.

On May 13, 2005, the Company entered into a lease agreement for the lease of real property located in Sunnyvale,
California. The lease agreement has a seven year term, commencing January 1, 2006 and ending December 31, 2012.

The Company's principal facilities in the United States are leased under various cancelable and non-cancelable operating
leases that expire at various dates through 2013. For tenant improvement allowances and rent holidays, Trimble records a
deferred rent liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortizes the deferred rent over the terms of the leases as
reductions to rent expense on the consolidated statements of income. The Company has options to renew certain of these
leases for an additional five years.

Future minimum payments required under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

2009 ...................................................................... $
2010 ......................................................................
2011 ......................................................................
2012 ......................................................................
2013 ......................................................................
Thereafter .............................................................
Total ..................................................................... $

17,598
12,084
7,666
5,631
1,044
156
44,179

Net rent expense under operating leases was $16.2 million in fiscal 2008, $14.2 million in fiscal 2007, and $10.5 million
in fiscal 2006. Sublease income was $49,000, $39,000 and $44,000 for fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

Additionally, as of January 2, 2009, the Company had acquisition earn-outs of $6.3 million and holdbacks of $20.8
million recorded in “Other current liabilities” and “Other non-current liabilities.” The maximum remaining payments,
including the $6.3 million and $20.8 million recorded, will not exceed $71.7 million. The remaining payments are based
upon targets achieved or events occurring over time that would result in amounts paid that may be lower than the
maximum remaining payments. The remaining earn-outs and holdbacks are payable through 2012.

At January 2, 2009, the company had unconditional purchase obligations of approximately $68.7 million. These
unconditional purchase obligations primarily represent open non-cancelable purchase orders for material purchases with
our vendors. Purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty.

NOTE 11: FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

As discussed in Note 2, SFAS No. 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and
requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value, became effective for the Company
beginning in its first quarter of fiscal 2008. Fair value is defined as the price at which an asset could be exchanged in a
current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would
be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor.
Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or
parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation
techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price
transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity.

Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are
categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical
levels, defined by SFAS No. 157 and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair
valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:

Level I – Observable inputs such as unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the
measurement date.

Level II – Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level I) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or
liability. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level III – Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and
the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.

Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized in the tables below based upon the
lowest level of significant input to the valuations.

(in thousands)
Assets
Money market funds (1) ................................. $
Commercial paper (2) ....................................
Deferred compensation plan assets (3) ..........
Derivative assets (4) .......................................
Total ............................................................... $

Liabilities
Deferred compensation plan liabilities (3) ..... $
Derivative liabilities (4) .................................
Total ............................................................... $

Fair Values as of January 2, 2009

Level I

Level II

Level III

Total

16,246
-
-
-
16,246

-
-
-

-
12,000
6,679
627
19,306

6,631
1,775
8,406

-
-
-
-
-

-
-
-

16,246
12,000
6,679
627
35,552

6,631
1,775
8,406

(1) The Company may invest some of its cash and cash equivalents in highly liquid investments such as money market

funds. The fair values are determined using observable quoted prices.

(2) The Company may invest some of its cash and cash equivalents in highly liquid investments such as commercial
paper. The fair values are determined using observable quoted prices for similar assets in active markets. The
Company’s investment in commercial paper is part of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC)
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP), which is fully guaranteed by FDIC.

(3) The Company maintains a self-directed, non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain executives and other
highly compensated employees. The investment assets and liabilities included in Level II are valued using quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active.

(4) Derivative assets and liabilities included in Level II primarily represent forward currency exchange contracts. The

fair values are determined using inputs based on observable quoted prices.

Additional Fair Value Information

The following table provides additional fair value information relating to the Company’s financial instruments
outstanding:

As of

(in thousands)

Assets:

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

January 2, 2009

December 28, 2007

Cash and cash equivalents .................. $
Forward foreign currency exchange

147,531

103,202

contracts ..........................................

627

374

Liabilities:

Credit facility ...................................... $
Forward foreign currency exchange

contracts ..........................................
Promissory note and other ..................

151,000

127,754

60,000

49,000

1,775
588

1,775
554

552
690

552
630

The fair value of the bank borrowings and promissory notes has been calculated using an estimate of the interest rate the
Company would have had to pay on the issuance of notes with a similar maturity and discounting the cash flows at that
rate. The fair values do not give an indication of the amount that Trimble would currently have to pay to extinguish any
of this debt.

NOTE 12: INCOME TAXES

The components of income before income taxes are as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended

(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,

December 29,

2007

2006

United States ........................................................................ $
Foreign .................................................................................
Total ..................................................................................... $

89,696
102,266
191,962

126,768
57,362
184,130

123,800
24,300
148,100

The Company's income tax provision consisted of the following:

Fiscal Years Ended

(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,

December 29,

2007

2006

US Federal:
Current .................................................................................. $
Deferred ................................................................................

US State:
Current ..................................................................................
Deferred ................................................................................

Foreign:
Current ..................................................................................
Deferred ................................................................................

Income tax provision ............................................................ $

42,473
(7,024)
35,449

5,165
(2,271)
2,894

13,976
(1,829)
12,147
50,490

48,833
(1,658)
47,175

6,374
(3,669)
2,705

10,403
6,099
16,502
66,382

47,795
(2,972)
44,823

2,967
(2,168)
799

(1,493)
305
(1,188)
44,434

The income tax provision differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory US federal income tax rate to
income before taxes. The sources and tax effects of the differences are as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended

(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,

December 29,

2007

2006

Expected tax from continuing operations at 35% in all

years ................................................................................. $

67,187

64,446

51,832

US State income taxes .........................................................
Export sales incentives ........................................................
Foreign tax rate differential .................................................
US Federal and California research and development

credits ...............................................................................
Stock option compensation..................................................
Other ....................................................................................
Income tax provision ........................................................... $

3,339
-
(23,553)

(3,651)
3,550
3,618
50,490

1,654
(365 )
(711 )

(2,206 )
3,889
(325 )
66,382

(110)
(4,138)
(7,682)

(662)
3,626
1,568
44,434

Effective tax rate .................................................................

26%

36 %

30%

Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the
Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

As of
(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

Deferred tax liabilities:
Purchased intangibles ...............................................................................
Depreciation and amortization ..................................................................
Other .........................................................................................................
Total deferred tax liabilities ......................................................................

Deferred tax assets:
Inventory valuation differences ................................................................
Expenses not currently deductible ............................................................
US Federal credit carryforwards ...............................................................
Deferred revenue ......................................................................................
US State credit carryforwards ...................................................................
Warranty ...................................................................................................
US Federal net operating loss carryforward ............................................
Net foreign tax credits on undistributed foreign earnings .........................
Accruals not currently deductible .............................................................
Total deferred tax assets ...........................................................................
Valuation allowance .................................................................................
Total deferred tax assets ...........................................................................

64,737
24,085
568
89,390

8,298
8,091
2,314
10,850
11,350
2,418
16,272
19,689
15,280
94,562
(5,787 )
88,775

68,561
26,720
183
95,464

7,359
10,044
2,313
8,000
10,011
2,177
24,765
12,857
17,104
94,630
(6,471)
88,159

Total net deferred tax liabilities ................................................................

(615 )

(7,305)

The Company has $15.3 million, $0.6 million and $7.7 million of tax effected U.S. federal, state and foreign net
operating loss carryforwards (expiring in years 2020 through 2028 for federal and state carryovers, no expiration for
foreign carryovers) from acquisitions. Utilization of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards are subject to
annual limitations due to ownership changes provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company
has federal research and development credit carryforwards of $2.0 million (expiring in years 2019 through 2024) and
state research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $15.2 million that can be carried over indefinitely.

The Company’s valuation allowance is primarily attributable to acquisition related net operating loss and research and
development credit carryforwards. Management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize
these deferred tax assets, and, accordingly, a valuation allowance has been established for such amounts.

On September 30, 2008, the State of California enacted Assembly Bill 1452 into law which among other provisions,
suspends net operating loss deductions for 2008 and 2009 and extends the carryforward period of any net operating
losses not utilized due to such suspension; adopts the federal 20-year net operating loss carryforward period; phases-in
the federal two-year net operating loss carryback periods beginning in 2011 and limits the utilization of tax credits to the
extent of 50 percent of a taxpayer’s taxable income. The Company recorded additional state tax provision, net of federal
benefits as a result of this law change in the fourth quarter of 2008.

The U.S. Federal Tax Extenders and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008 was signed into law on October 3,
2008. Under this law, the federal research and development tax credit was retroactively extended for amounts paid or
incurred after December 31, 2007 and before January 1, 2010. The effect of the change in this law for the Company was
an increase of $2.4 million in credits for the quarter ended January 2, 2009.

The Company’s policy with respect to its undistributed foreign subsidiaries’ earnings is to consider some of those
earnings to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no related provision for U.S. federal and state income taxes has
been provided. Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company may be subject
to both U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and foreign withholding taxes. As of January
2, 2009 the Company’s foreign subsidiary accumulated undistributed earnings that are intended to be indefinitely
reinvested outside the U.S. is approximately $58.3 million. The amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability on this
amount is approximately $19.2 million.

A reconciliation of the change in the unrecognized tax balances (UTB) from December 28, 2007 to January 2, 2009 is as
follows:

(in thousands)

Federal, State
and Foreign
Tax

Accrued
Interest and
Penalties

Unrecognized
Income Tax
Benefits

Balance at December 29, 2006 ......................................................................... $

21,500 $

2,200 $

23,700

Additions for tax positions related to the current year ......................................

2,800

1,000

3,800

Additions for tax positions related to prior years ..............................................

800

Other reductions for tax positions related to prior years ...................................

(400)

(100)

(500)

Foreign exchange ..............................................................................................

600

Balance at December 28, 2007 ......................................................................... $

25,300 $

3,100 $

28,400

Total UTBs that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate as of

December 28, 2007 ....................................................................................... $

25,300 $

3,100 $

28,400

Additions for tax positions related to the current year ......................................

5,300

1,320

6,620

Additions for tax positions related to prior years ..............................................

3,800

3800

Other reductions for tax positions related to prior years ...................................

(900)

(20)

Foreign exchange ..............................................................................................

(600)

(920)

(600)

Balance at January 2, 2009 ............................................................................... $

32,900 $

4,400

37,300

Total UTBs that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate as of

January 2, 2009 ............................................................................................. $

32,900 $

4,400

37,300

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal, state, and foreign income taxes. The Company has
substantially concluded all U.S. federal and state income tax matters for years through 1992. Non-U.S. income tax
matters have been concluded for years through 2000. The Company is currently in various stages of multiple year
examinations by Federal, State, and foreign taxing authorities. The Company does not anticipate a significant impact to
the unrecognized tax benefits balance with respect to current tax examinations. Although the timing of the resolution
and/or closure on audits is highly uncertain, the Company does not believe that the unrecognized tax benefits would
materially change in the next twelve months.

The Company’s continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax
expense. The Company’s liability includes interest and penalties at January 2, 2009 and December 30, 2007, of $4.4
million and $3.1 million, respectively, which were recorded in Other non-current liabilities in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets.

NOTE 13: COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The components of comprehensive income and related tax effects are as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended

January 2,
2009

December 28, December 29,

2007

2006

(in thousands)
Net income ...................................................................................... $
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $583 in

2008 and $(636) in 2007 ..............................................................
Net unrealized actuarial gain (loss) .................................................
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments .......................................
Total comprehensive income ....................................................... $

141,472 $

117,374 $

103,658

(31,722)
43
(392)
109,401 $

18,655
(13)
(33)
135,983 $

21,709
-
4
125,371

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related tax were as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended

(in thousands)
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments .........
Net unrealized loss on investments ........................................
Net unrealized actuarial losses ...............................................
Total accumulated other comprehensive income ...............

January 2,
2009

December 28,

2007

28,147
(392)
(106)
27,649

59,869
-
(149)
59,720

NOTE 14: EMPLOYEE STOCK BENEFIT PLANS

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Purchase Plan”) under which an aggregate of 11,550,000 shares
of Common Stock have been reserved for sale to eligible employees as approved by the shareholders to date. The plan
permits full-time employees to purchase Common Stock through payroll deductions at 85% of the lower of the fair
market value of the Common Stock at the beginning or at the end of each offering period, which is generally six months.
The amended Purchase Plan terminates on September 30, 2018. In fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the shares issued under
the Purchase Plan were 437,833, 430,068 and 195,398 shares, respectively. Compensation expense recognized during
fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 related to shares granted under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan was $3.4 million, $2.6
million and $1.8 million, respectively. At January 2, 2009, the number of shares reserved for future purchases by eligible
employees was 572,217.

Restricted Stock Award

Trimble did not grant any restricted stock awards in fiscal 2008 or fiscal 2007. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006,
the Company granted 40,000 shares of restricted common stock. The award vests 20% on June 30, 2005 and an
additional 20% each June 30 thereafter. The Company recorded compensation expense in the Consolidated Statements of
Income of $155,000, $191,000 and $191,000 for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

2002 Stock Plan

In 2002, Trimble’s board of directors adopted the 2002 Stock Plan (“2002 Plan”). The 2002 Plan approved by the
shareholders provides for the granting of incentive and non-statutory stock options and stock awards for up to
12,000,000 shares plus any shares currently reserved but unissued to employees, consultants, and directors of Trimble.
Incentive stock options may be granted at exercise prices that are not less than 100% of the fair market value of Common
Stock on the date of grant. Employee stock options granted under the 2002 Plan generally have 84-120 month terms, and
vest at a rate of 20% at the first anniversary of grant and monthly thereafter at an annual rate of 20%, with full vesting
occurring at the fifth anniversary of the grant. In certain instances, grants vest at a rate of 40% at the second anniversary
of grant and monthly thereafter at an annual rate of 20% with full vesting occurring at the fifth anniversary of the grant.
The Company issues new shares for option exercises. The majority of the restricted share units granted under this plan
vest 100% after three years. As of January 2, 2009, options to purchase 8,651,279 shares were outstanding, 156,497
restricted stock units were unvested, and 1,928,329 were available for future grant under the 2002 Plan.

@Road Plan

In connection with the acquisition of @Road in February 2007, the Company assumed all of the outstanding stock
options of @Road’s 2000 Stock Option Plan (“@Road Plan”) as well as the plan itself. The @Road Plan provides for
the granting of incentive and non-statutory stock options. Incentive stock options may be granted at exercise prices that
are not less than 100% of the fair market value of Common Stock on the date of grant. Employee stock options granted
under the @Road Plan generally have 120-month terms, and vest at a rate of 20% at the first anniversary of grant and
monthly thereafter at an annual rate of 20%, with full vesting occurring at the fifth anniversary of the grant. The
Company issues new shares for option exercises. As of January 2, 2009 options to purchase 581,342 shares were
outstanding under the @Road Plan. Shares under this plan are no longer available for grant due to the Merger of @Road
into Trimble.

1993 Stock Option Plan

In 1992, Trimble's board of directors adopted the 1993 Stock Option Plan (“1993 Plan”). The 1993 Plan, as amended to
date and approved by shareholders, provided for the granting of incentive and non-statutory stock options for up to
19,125,000 shares of Common Stock to employees, consultants, and directors of Trimble. Incentive stock options may be
granted at exercise prices that are not less than 100% of the fair market value of Common Stock on the date of grant.
Employee stock options granted under the 1993 Plan have 120-month terms, and vest at a rate of 20% at the first
anniversary of grant, and monthly thereafter at an annual rate of 20%, with full vesting occurring at the fifth anniversary
of grant. The Company issues new shares for option exercises. As of January 2, 2009 options to purchase 1,088,594
shares were outstanding and no shares were available for future grant.

1992 Employee Stock Bonus Plan

In 1992, Trimble's board of directors approved the 1992 Employee Stock Bonus Plan ("Bonus Plan"). As of January 2,
2009, there were no options outstanding to purchase shares and 5,578 were available for future grant under the 1992
Employee Stock Bonus Plan.

1990 Director Stock Option Plan

In December 1990, Trimble adopted a Director Stock Option Plan under which an aggregate of 1,140,000 shares of
Common Stock have been reserved for issuance to non-employee directors as approved by the shareholders to date. At
January 2, 2009, options to purchase 135,000 shares were outstanding, and no shares were available for future grants
under the Director Stock Option Plan.

Options Outstanding and Exercisable

Exercise prices for options outstanding as of January 2, 2009, ranged from $2.67 to $40.59. In view of the wide range of
exercise prices, Trimble considers it appropriate to provide the following additional information with respect to options
outstanding at January 2, 2009:

Range

Number
Outstanding

(in thousands, except for per share data)

Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable

Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
per Share

Weighted-
Average
Remaining

Contractual Life (Years)

Number
Exercisable

Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
per Share

$2.67 – $5.82
$6.00 – $7.85
$8.02 – $8.50
$8.77 – $14.53
$14.56 – $17.00
$17.06 – $19.78
$19.96
$20.04 – $23.36
$23.44
$23.55 – $40.59
Total

1,263
281
1,077
1534
1,514
339
1,280
227
1,206
1,735
10,456

5.05
6.77
8.50
13.65
16.59
18.66
19.96
21.80
23.44
32.96
17.76

2.78
2.30
4.46
4.78
6.58
6.44
6.77
6.87
4.74
6.07
5.25

1,263
281
1,078
1305
967
247
-
154
499
200
5,994

5.05
6.77
8.50
13.56
16.49
18.73
-
21.91
23.44
30.00
12.81

Number Of
Shares (in
thousands)

Weighted-
Average Exercise
Price per Share

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in years)

Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)

Options outstanding ...........................................
Options outstanding and expected to vest ..........
Options exercisable ............................................

10,456 $
9,696
5,594

17.76
17.26
12.81

5.27 $
5.20
4.60

67,317
65,915
59,012

Options outstanding and expected to vest are adjusted for expected forfeitures. The aggregate intrinsic value is the total
pretax intrinsic value based on the Company’s closing stock price of $22.30 as of January 2, 2009, which would have
been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date.

As of January 2, 2009, the total unamortized stock option expense is $31.3 million with a weighted-average recognition
period of 3.3 years.

Option Activity

Activity during fiscal 2008, under the combined plans was as follows:

Options

Weighted average
exercise price

(in thousands, except for per share data)

Outstanding at beginning of year ...............
Granted ...................................................
Assumed from @Road ...........................
Exercised ................................................
Cancelled ................................................
Outstanding at end of year .........................

10,123
1,998
-
(1,262)
(403)
$

10,456

Available for grant .....................................

1,934

15.88
23.32
-
9.99
22.49
17.76

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $28.3 million, $68.4 million and
$48.8 million, respectively. Compensation expense recognized during fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 related to stock
options was $11.8 million, $12.3 million and $10.7 million, respectively.

Restricted Stock Unit Activity

Activity during fiscal 2008 was as follows:

Restricted
Stock Units

Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair Value

(in thousands, except for per share data)

Nonvested at beginning of year .....................................
Granted .......................................................................
Vested ........................................................................
Cancelled ....................................................................
Nonvested at end of year ...............................................

63 $
99 $
-
(6) $
156 $

40.55
20.19
-
38.56
27.78

Compensation expense recognized during fiscal 2008 and 2007 related to restricted stock units was $1.0 million and
$65,000, respectively. There were no restricted stock units granted prior to fiscal 2007. As of January 2, 2009, there was
$2.9 million of total unamortized restricted stock unit compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock units,
with a weighted-average recognition period of 2.42 years.

Warrants

On April 12, 2002, the Company issued to Spectra-Physics Holdings USA, Inc., a warrant to purchase up to 1,128,700
shares of Trimble’s Common Stock over a fixed period of time. Initially, Spectra-Physics’ warrant entitled it to purchase
600,000 shares of Common Stock over a five-year period at an exercise price of $5.04 per share. On a quarterly basis
beginning July 14, 2002, Spectra-Physics’ warrant became exercisable for an additional 750 shares of Common Stock for
every $1 million of principal and interest outstanding to Spectra-Physics until the obligation was paid off in full. These
shares are purchasable at a price equal to the average of Trimble’s closing price for the five days immediately proceeding
the last trading day of each quarter. On July 14, 2002 an additional 52,092 shares became exercisable at an exercise price
of $4.82 per share. On October 14, 2002 an additional 53,472 shares became exercisable at an exercise price of $3.06.
On January 14, 2003, an additional 54,852 shares became exercisable at an exercise price of $4.52. On April 14, 2003,
an additional 28,623 shares became exercisable at an exercise price of $6.69. The approximate fair value of the warrants
of $2.4 million was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: contractual life
of 5-year period, risk-free interest rate of 4%; volatility of 65%; and no dividends during the contractual term. The
additional shares are exercisable over a 5-year period. No additional shares will be issuable under the warrant as the
underlying obligation has been paid off in full. During fiscal 2008 there were 28,623 shares exercised related to the
warrants. For fiscal 2007, 760,416 shares were exercised and for fiscal 2006, no shares were exercised. As of January 2,
2009, there are no shares outstanding and exercisable under the warrants.

NOTE 15: BENEFIT PLANS

401(k) Plan

Under the Company’s 401(k) Plan, U.S. employee participants (including employees of certain subsidiaries) may direct
the investment of contributions to their accounts among certain mutual funds and the Trimble Navigation Limited
Common Stock Fund. The Trimble Fund sold 106,931 net shares of Common Stock for an aggregate of $3.2 million in
fiscal 2008. The Company, at its discretion, matches individual employee 401(k) Plan contributions at a rate of fifty
cents of every dollar that the employee contributes to the 401(k) Plan up to 5% of the employee’s annual salary to an
annual maximum of $2,500. The Company’s matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan were $3.3 million in fiscal 2008,
3.1 million in fiscal 2007, and $2.5 million in fiscal 2006.

Defined Contribution Pension Plans

Certain of the Company’s European subsidiaries participate in state sponsored pension plans. Contributions are based on
specified percentages of employee salaries. For these plans, the Company contributed and charged to expense
approximately $0.9 million for fiscal 2008, $0.8 million for fiscal 2007 and $0.7 million for fiscal 2006.

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

The Company provides defined benefit pension plans in Sweden and Germany. The largest of these plans is provided by
the Swedish subsidiary which has an unfunded defined benefit pension plan that covered substantially all of its full-time
employees through 1993. Benefits are based on a percentage of eligible earnings. The employee must have had a
projected period of pensionable service of at least 30 years as of 1993. If the period was shorter, the pension benefits
were reduced accordingly. Active employees do not accrue any future benefits; therefore, there is no service cost and the
liability will only increase for interest cost.

On December 28, 2007, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158. The Company
adopted the measurement date provision in fiscal year 2008. SFAS 158 required the Company to recognize the funded
status (i.e., the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligations) of its pension plan
in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
tax. The adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income at adoption represents the net unrecognized actuarial
losses and unrecognized transition obligation remaining from the initial adoption of SFAS 87, all of which were
previously netted against the plan’s funded status in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets pursuant to the
provisions of Statement 87. These amounts will be subsequently recognized as net periodic pension cost pursuant to the
Company’s historical accounting policy for amortizing such amounts. Further, actuarial gains and losses that arise in
subsequent periods and are not recognized as net periodic pension cost in the same periods will be recognized as a
component of other comprehensive income. Those amounts will be subsequently recognized as a component of net
periodic pension cost on the same basis as the amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at
adoption of SFAS 158. The adoption of SFAS 158 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
statement of income for any period presented.

The pension related balances on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007
are presented in the following table.

Fiscal Years Ended

(in thousands)

January 2, 2009

December 28, 2007

Current accrued pension liability .............................. $
Non-current accrued pension liability .......................

140
5,439

Unrecognized actuarial loss ......................................

(106)

276
6,646

(149)

The changes in the benefit obligations and plan assets of the significant non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans for fiscal
2008 and 2007 were as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended

(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year .................................................................................... $
Adjustment to (exclude)/include benefit obligation for the Netherlands subsidiary* ........
Benefit obligation at beginning of year (restated).....................................................................
Service cost ........................................................................................................................
Interest cost ........................................................................................................................
Benefits paid ......................................................................................................................
Foreign exchange impact ...................................................................................................
Actuarial (gains) losses ......................................................................................................
Benefit obligation at end of year ...............................................................................................
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year ...........................................................................
Adjustment to include fair value of plan assets for the Netherlands subsidiary ................
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year (restated) ...........................................................
Actual return on plan assets ...............................................................................................
Employer contribution .......................................................................................................
Plan participants’ contributions .........................................................................................
Benefits paid ......................................................................................................................
Foreign exchange impact ...................................................................................................
Fair value of plan assets at end of year .....................................................................................

10,231 $
(2,334)
7,897
33
337
(303)
(963)
(62)
6,939

3,309
(1,984)
1,325
38
68
-
(59)
(12)
1,360

9,398
336
9,734
411
460
(359)
173
(188)
10,231

2,913
(13)
2,900
(92)
355
-
(123)
269
3,309

Benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at end of year ......................................................... $

5,579 $

6,922

Current portion (included in accrued compensation and benefits) ...........................................
Non-current portion (included in other non-current liabilities) ................................................

140
5,439

276
6,646

*The Company changed its defined benefit pension plan in Netherlands to a defined contribution plan in fiscal 2008.

The under-funded status of the plan of $5.6 million at January 2, 2009 is recognized in the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheets as a short-term and a long-term accrued pension liability. No plan assets are expected to be returned to
Trimble during fiscal 2008.

Net periodic benefit cost in fiscal 2008 was not material.

Actuarial assumptions used to determine the net periodic pension costs for fiscal 2008 were as follows:

Discount rate .............................................
Rate of compensation increase ..................
Measurement Date ....................................

4.8%
2.0%

6.5%
2.0%

1/2/2009

Swedish Subsidiary

German Subsidiaries

The Company’s accumulated benefits obligation was approximately $6.9 million and $10.2 million for fiscal 2008 and
fiscal 2007, respectively.

The Company’s plan assets are primarily located in the Company's German subsidiaries. For German subsidiaries, for fiscal
2008, the asset allocation of the total plan assets was approximately as follows: 89% local government bonds, 7% real
estate and 4% equity securities. Long-term asset allocation and expected return on assets assumptions are derived from
detailed annual studies conducted by the Company's asset management group and actuaries. The Company’s asset
management group limits allocation to equity securities and real estate to a maximum of 10% and 25%, respectively, with
the remaining assets to be allocated to local government bonds. While the asset allocation give appropriate consideration to
recent performance and historical returns, the strategy is focused primarily on conservative and sustainable long-term
returns. Based on historical returns, the Company expects future return on assets to be approximately 4%.

The Company expects to contribute approximately $372,000 to plan assets in fiscal year ended 2009.

The following benefit payments, which reflect estimated future employee service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (in
thousands):

2009 $
2010
2011
2012
2013
Thereafter
$

Total

390
422
431
434
465
6,457
8,599

NOTE 16: STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW DATA

Fiscal Years Ended
(in thousands)

January 2,
2009

December 28, December 29,

2007

2006

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Interest paid ................................................................................................................ $
Income taxes paid ....................................................................................................... $

2,451 $
73,756 $

6,250 $
35,170 $

8
36,000

Significant non-cash investing activities:

Issuance of shares to acquire @Road .......................................................................... $

- $

161,947 $

NOTE 17: LITIGATION

From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation arising out of the ordinary course of its business. There are no
known claims or pending litigation expected to have a material effect on the Company’s overall financial position,
results of operations, or liquidity.

NOTE 18: SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

Fiscal period ended
(in thousands, except per share data)

March 28,

2008

June 27,
2008

September 26,
2008

January 2,
2009

Revenue ............................................................................................ $
Gross margin.....................................................................................
Net income ........................................................................................

355,296
174,376
40,067

377,767 $
187,099
48,599

328,087 $
165,623
39,067

268,084
122,038
13,739

Basic net income per share ...............................................................
Diluted net income per share ............................................................

0.33
0.32

0.40
0.39

0.32
0.31

0.12
0.11

Fiscal period ended
(in thousands, except per share data)

March 30,

2007

June 29,
2007

September 28, December 28,

2007

285,732
143,130
28,683

327,732 $
167,169
35,026

296,023 $
146,940
27,374

312,783
155,666
26,291

Basic net income per share ...............................................................
Diluted net income per share ............................................................

0.25
0.24

0.29
0.28

0.23
0.22

0.22
0.21

Trimble has a 52-53 week fiscal year, ending on the Friday nearest to December 31. Fiscal 2008 was a 53-week year and
fiscal 2007 was a 52-week year. As a result of the extra week, year-over-year results may not be comparable. The
Company was shut down an additional week during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. Thus, due to the inherent nature of
adopting a 52-53 week fiscal year, the Company, analysts, shareholders, investors, and others will have to make
appropriate adjustments to any analysis performed when comparing our activities and results.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Trimble Navigation Limited

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Trimble Navigation Limited as of January 2, 2009
and December 28, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended January 2, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in
the index at Item 15 (a) Schedule II. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of Trimble Navigation Limited at January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 2, 2009, in conformity with U.S
generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
uncertain tax positions as of December 30, 2006.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), Trimble Navigation Limited’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission and our report dated February 27, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
February 27, 2009

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Trimble Navigation Limited

We have audited Trimble Navigation Limited's internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2009, based on
criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Trimble Navigation Limited’s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies
and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.

In our opinion, Trimble Navigation Limited maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of January 2, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the consolidated balance sheets of Trimble Navigation Limited as of January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007,
and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended January 2, 2009 and our report dated February 27, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
February 27, 2009

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the
end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

The Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our internal control over financial
reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of any
system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal
control over financial reporting based on the Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the results of this evaluation, the Company’s
management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 2, 2009.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2009 has been audited by Ernst &
Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included elsewhere
herein.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended January 2, 2009, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

PART III

The information required by this item, insofar as it relates to Trimble’s directors, will be contained under the captions
“Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement and is
incorporated herein by reference. The information required by this item relating to executive officers is set forth above in
Item 1 Business Overview under the caption “Executive Officers.”

The information required by this item in so far as it relates to the nominating and audit committees will be contained in
the Proxy Statement under the caption “Board Meetings and Committees.”

Code of Ethics

The Company’s Business Ethics and Conduct Policy applies to, among others, to the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance, Corporate Controller, and other finance organization
employees. The Business Ethics and Conduct Policy is available on the Company’s website at www.trimble.com under
the heading “Corporate Governance and Policies” on the Investor Information page of our website. A copy will be
provided, without charge, to any shareholder who requests one by written request addressed to General Counsel, Trimble
Navigation Limited, 935 Stewart Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94085.

If any substantive amendments to the Business Ethics and Conduct Policy are made or any waivers are granted,
including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the Business Ethics and Conduct Policy, to its Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance, or Corporate Controller, the Company will disclose the
nature of such amendment or waiver on the Company’s website at www.trimble.com or in a report on Form 8-K.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Executive
Compensation” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Principal Accounting
Fees and Services” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) (1) Financial Statements

PART IV

The following consolidated financial statements required by this item are included in Part II Item 8 hereof under the
caption “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 2, 2009 and December 28, 2007 ......................................................

Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2009, December 28, 2007 and
December 29, 2006 ..........................................................................................................................................

Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2009, December 28,
2007 and December 29, 2006 ..........................................................................................................................

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2009, December 28, 2007
and December 29, 2006 ...................................................................................................................................

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ....................................................................................................

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm...........................................................................

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

The following financial statement schedule is filed as part of this report:

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts ..........................................................................................

Page in this
Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
46

Page in this
Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
S-1

All other schedules have been omitted as they are either not required or not applicable, or the required information is
included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

(b) Exhibits

Exhibit
Number

3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
4.1
4.2
4.3
10.1+
10. 2+
10.3+
10.4+
10.5+

Exhibit
Number

10.6+
10.7+

10.8+
10.9+

10.10

10.11+
10.12+
10.13+

10.14+
10.15+
10.16
10.17+
10.18+
10.19
10.20+
21.1
23.1
24.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2

+
(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)

(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

Employment Agreement between the Company and Steven W. Berglund dated March 17, 1999. (9)
Trimble Navigation Limited Deferred Compensation Plan effective December 30, 2004, as amended and restated
October 19, 2007. (10)
Australian Addendum to the Trimble Navigation Limited 1988 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (12)
Trimble Navigation Limited 2002 Stock Plan (as amended and restated December 31, 2008), including forms of option
and restricted stock unit agreements. (27)
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated February 16, 2007 (amending and restating the Credit Agreement dated
as of July 28, 2005) among Trimble Navigation Limited, the Subsidiary Borrowers, The Bank of Nova Scotia
(Administrative Agent, Issuing Bank and Swing Line Bank), Citibank N.A. and BMO Capital Markets (Co-Syndication
Agents), Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (Co-Documentation Agents), The Bank of Nova Scotia and
BNY Capital Markets, Inc. (Joint Lead Arrangers), and The Bank of Nova Scotia (Sole Book Runner). (13)
Employment Agreement between the Company and Rajat Bahri dated December 6, 2004. (18)
Board of Directors Compensation Policy effective July 1, 2007. (26)
Amended and Restated form of Change in Control severance agreement between the Company and certain Company
officers. (27)
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Steven W. Berglund dated December 19, 2008. (27)
Amendment to letter of employment between the Company and Rajat Bahri dated December 31, 2008. (27)
Lease dated May 11, 2005 between CarrAmerica Realty Operating Partnership, L.P. and the Company. (22)
Trimble Navigation Limited 2007 Management Incentive Plan Description. (20)
@Road, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended May 16, 2000. (24)
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. (27)
Trimble Navigation Limited Annual Management Incentive Plan Description. (21)
Subsidiaries of the Company. (27)
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. (27)
Power of Attorney included on signature page herein.
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (27)
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (27)
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (27)
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (27)

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File
No. 33-35333), which became effective July 19, 1990.
Incorporated by reference exhibit number 10.46 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-
45990), which was filed February 25, 1992.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.32 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1993.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, which was filed
on February 18, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 1, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 1, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 1, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 1, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.67 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended January 1, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 28, 2007.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended October 3, 2003.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.77 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 29, 2000.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 30, 2007.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
July 4, 2003.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 29, 2006.

Exhibit
Number

(16)

(17)

(18)

(19)

(20)

(21)
(22)

(23)

(24)

(25)

(26)

(27)

Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
April 2, 2004.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 4.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.13 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 30, 2005.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 30,
2007.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2008.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 30, 2005.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 30, 2007.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.19 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 29, 2006.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
29, 2006.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
28, 2007.
Filed herewith.

EXHIBIT LIST

Exhibit
Number

3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
4.1
4.2
4.3
10.1+
10. 2+
10.3+
10.4+
10.5+
10.6+
10.7+

10.8+
10.9+

10.10

10.11+
10.12+
10.13+

10.14+

Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed June 25, 1986. (5)
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed October 6, 1988. (6)
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed July 18, 1990. (7)
Certificate of Determination of the Company filed February 19, 1999. (8)
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed May 29, 2003. (14)
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed March 4, 2004. (16)
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed February 21, 2007. (23)
Bylaws of the Company (amended and restated through July 20, 2006). (15)
Specimen copy of certificate for shares of Common Stock of the Company. (1)
Preferred Shares Rights Agreement dated as of February 18, 1999. (4)
Agreement of Substitution and Amendment of Preferred Shares Rights Agreement dated September 10, 2004. (17)
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and its officers and directors. (19)
1990 Director Stock Option Plan, as amended, and form of Outside Director Non-statutory Stock Option Agreement. (3)
1992 Management Discount Stock Option and form of Non-statutory Stock Option Agreement. (2)
1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended October 24, 2003. (11)
Trimble Navigation 1988 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended January 17, 2007. (25)
Employment Agreement between the Company and Steven W. Berglund dated March 17, 1999. (9)
Trimble Navigation Limited Deferred Compensation Plan effective December 30, 2004, as amended and restated
October 19, 2007. (10)
Australian Addendum to the Trimble Navigation Limited 1988 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (12)
Trimble Navigation Limited 2002 Stock Plan (as amended and restated December 31, 2008), including forms of option
and restricted stock unit agreements. (27)
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated February 16, 2007 (amending and restating the Credit
Agreement dated as of July 28, 2005) among Trimble Navigation Limited, the Subsidiary Borrowers, The
Bank of Nova Scotia (Administrative Agent, Issuing Bank and Swing Line Bank), Citibank N.A. and BMO
Capital Markets (Co-Syndication Agents), Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (Co-
Documentation Agents), The Bank of Nova Scotia and BNY Capital Markets, Inc. (Joint Lead Arrangers),
and The Bank of Nova Scotia (Sole Book Runner). (13)
Employment Agreement between the Company and Rajat Bahri dated December 6, 2004. (18)
Board of Directors Compensation Policy effective July 1, 2007. (26)
Amended and Restated form of Change in Control severance agreement between the Company and certain
Company officers. (27)
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Steven W. Berglund dated December 19,
2008. (27)
Amendment to letter of employment between the Company and Rajat Bahri dated December 31, 2008. (27)
Lease dated May 11, 2005 between CarrAmerica Realty Operating Partnership, L.P. and the Company. (22)
Trimble Navigation Limited 2007 Management Incentive Plan Description. (20)

10.15+
10.16
10.17+
10.18+ @Road, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended May 16, 2000. (24)
10.19
10.20+
21.1
23.1
24.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2

Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. (27)
Trimble Navigation Limited Annual Management Incentive Plan Description. (21)
Subsidiaries of the Company. (27)
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. (27)
Power of Attorney included on signature page herein.
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (27)
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (27)
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (27)
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (27)

+
(1)

(2)

(3)

Exhibit
Number

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)

(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

(16)

(17)

(18)

(19)

(20)

(21)
(22)

(23)

(24)

(25)

(26)

(27)

Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, which was filed
on February 18, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 1, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 1, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 1, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 1, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.67 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended January 1, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 28, 2007.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended October 3, 2003.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.77 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 29, 2000.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 30, 2007.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
July 4, 2003.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 29, 2006.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
April 2, 2004.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 4.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.13 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 30, 2005.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 30,
2007.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2008.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 30, 2005.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 30, 2007.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.19 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 29, 2006.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
29, 2006.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
28, 2007.
Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

TRIMBLE NAVIGATION LIMITED

By: /s/ Steven W. Berglund
Steven W. Berglund,
President and Chief Executive Officer

February 27, 2009

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Know all persons by these presents, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Steven W.
Berglund as his attorney-in-fact, with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any
amendments to this Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact,
or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature

Capacity in which Signed

/s/ Steven W. Berglund
Steven W. Berglund

/s/ Rajat Bahri
Rajat Bahri

/s/ Julie Shepard
Julie Shepard

John B. Goodrich

/s/ William Hart
William Hart

/s/ Ulf J. Johansson
Ulf J. Johansson

/s/ Bradford W. Parkinson
Bradford W. Parkinson

Nickolas W. Vande Steeg

/s/ Merit E. Janow
Merit E. Janow

President, Chief Executive Officer, Director

February 27, 2009

Chief Financial Officer and Assistant
Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)

February 27, 2009

Vice President of Finance and
Principal Accounting Officer

February 27, 2009

Director

March 2, 2009

February 25, 2009

Director

February 26, 2009

SCHEDULE II

TRIMBLE NAVIGATION LIMITED
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands, except for per share data)

Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Balance at beginning of period ............................................. $
Acquired allowance ..........................................................
Bad debt expense ..............................................................
Write-offs, net of recoveries .............................................
Balance at end of period ....................................................... $

Inventory allowance:
Balance at beginning of period ............................................. $
Acquired allowance ..........................................................
Additions to allowance .....................................................
Write-offs, net of recoveries .............................................
Balance at end of period ....................................................... $

Sales return reserve:
Balance at beginning of period ............................................. $
Acquired allowance ..........................................................
Additions (Reductions) to allowance ................................
Write-offs, net of recoveries .............................................
Balance at end of period ....................................................... $

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

December 29,
2006

5,221
131
2,667
(2,020)
5,999

29,626
1,720
4,892
(6,481)
29,757

1,684
-
162
(27)
1,819

4,063
1,812
1,303
(1,957)
5,221

28,582
560
4,524
(4,040)
29,626

859
295
465
64
1,683

5,230
494
163
(1,824)
4,063

23,238
1
7,061
(1,718)
28,582

1,500
55
(586)
(110)
859

Corporate Headquarters
Trimble Navigation Limited
935 Stewart Drive
Sunnyvale, California 94085
Phone: (408) 481-8000
www.trimble.com

Investor Relations Contact
(408) 481-7838
investor_relations@trimble.com