UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
_______________
FORM 10-K
________________
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
X .
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
.
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from___________ to ___________.
Commission file number: 000-55218
TRXADE GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
1115 Gunn Hwy Suite 202
Odessa, Florida
(Address of principal executive offices)
46-3673928
Identification Number)
33556
(Zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800)-261-0281
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.00001 par value
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
. Yes X . No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act.
. Yes X . No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. X . Yes . No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ( § 232.405 of
this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and
post such files). X . Yes . No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or
a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer .
Non-accelerated filer .
Accelerated filer .
Smaller reporting company X .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
Yes X . No
.
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of
March 24, 2016 based upon the closing price reported on such date was approximately $3,776,870. Shares of voting
stock held by each officer and director and by each person who, as of March 28, 2016, may be deemed to have
beneficially owned more than 10% of the outstanding voting stock have been excluded. This determination of affiliate
status is not necessarily a conclusive determination of affiliate status for any other purpose. There were 31,435,827
shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding on March 28, 2016.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
4
10
16
16
16
17
17
19
19
25
25
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 26
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
PART III
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
PART IV
26
27
28
31
33
35
36
37
3
PART I
Throughout this annual report on Form 10-K, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and “our company” refer to Trxade Group,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, and, unless the context indicates otherwise, also includes our subsidiary, Trxade, Inc., a
Florida corporation.
Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report contains forward-looking statements, which reflect the views of our management with respect to
future events and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of uncertainties and
other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Forward-looking statements are
identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “projects,” “targets” and similar
expressions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are based
on the information available to management at this time and which speak only as of this date. Our actual results may
differ materially from results anticipated in these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. For a
discussion of some of the factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-
looking statements, please read carefully the information under “Risk Factors.”
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. However, your attention is directed to any further disclosures made on related
subjects in our subsequent annual and periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Forms
10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, Proxy Statements on Schedule 14A and Information Statements on Schedule 14C.
We obtained the market data used in this report from internal company reports and industry publications. Industry
publications generally state that the information contained in those publications has been obtained from sources believed
to be reliable, but their accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed and their reliability cannot be assured. Although
we believe market data used in this 10-K is reliable, it has not been independently verified.
Item 1. Business
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes and other
financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Overview
We have designed and developed, and now own and operate a business-to-business web-based marketplace focused
on the US pharmaceutical industry. Our core service is designed to bring the nation’s independent pharmacies and
accredited national suppliers of pharmaceuticals together to provide efficient and transparent buying and selling
opportunities on a web-based platform.
CORPORATE HISTORY
Background of XCEL
Our company was incorporated in Delaware on July 15, 2005 as “Bluebird Exploration Company” (“Bluebird”).
Bluebird was originally formed to engage in the exploitation of mineral properties. In December 2008, Bluebird changed
its name to “Xcellink International, Inc.” (“XCEL”), and subsequently announced that its business plan was being
expanded to include the development and marketing of platform-independent customer-centric payment systems and
methodologies. XCEL was unable to raise the funds necessary to implement its business strategy, never generated any
revenue and was a reporting as a “shell” corporation. On January 9, 2014, Trxade Group, Inc., a privately held Nevada
corporation merged with and into XCEL, and XCEL changed its name to “Trxade Group, Inc.”XCEL’s shares traded
on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) market until early 2010.
4
Background of Trxade
PharmaCycle LLC, a Nevada limited liability company ("PharmaCycle"), was formed in August 2010 by Prashant Patel
to serve as a web-based market platform designed to enable trading among healthcare buyers and sellers of
pharmaceuticals, accessories and services. In January 2013, PharmaCycle converted into a Florida corporation and
changed its name to Trxade, Inc. ("Trxade Florida"). In May 2013, Trxade Florida created a new wholly owned
subsidiary, Trxade Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("Trxade Nevada"). Trxade Nevada acquired Trxade Florida
pursuant to a reverse triangular merger, resulting in Trxade Florida becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Trxade
Nevada (the "Nevada-Florida Merger"). The sole purpose of the Nevada-Florida Merger was to provide for a holding
company to own Trxade Florida, the operating company. At all times up to the Nevada-Florida Merger, Trxade Florida
was capitalized exclusively through cash capital contributions made by Messrs. Suren Ajjarapu and Patel. Immediately
following the Nevada-Florida Merger, Messrs. Ajjarapu and Patel collectively owned 99% of Trxade Nevada.
Subsequent to the Nevada-Florida Merger (but prior to the merger with XCEL), Trxade Nevada raised $670,000
through the sale of its preferred stock in private placements made to third party investors.
Reverse Merger with Trxade
On September 26, 2008, Mark Fingarson, the former President, sole Director and controlling shareholder of XCEL,
sold 80,000,000 shares of XCEL to XCEL’s then attorney, Ron McIntyre. On November 22, 2013, Trxade Nevada
acquired Mr. McIntyre’s controlling interest of 80,000,000 shares in XCEL pursuant to a Purchase and Sale
Agreement dated November 7, 2013. At the time of the sale, XCEL had 104,160,000 shares of common stock issued
and outstanding, including the 80,000,000 shares of stock acquired by Trxade Nevada.
On December 16, 2013, Trxade Nevada and XCEL entered into a definitive merger agreement (the “Merger
Agreement”) providing for the merger (the “Merger”) of Trxade Nevada with and into XCEL, with XCEL as the
surviving corporation. The Merger closed on January 8, 2014. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we amended
our articles of incorporation (filed herewith), changed our name to “Trxade Group, Inc.,” and changed our trading
symbol to XCEL.PK. On February 13, 2014 an additional 600,000 shares of our common stock (on a post-reverse
split basis) were issued pursuant to the conversion of $19,333 aggregate principal amount of our outstanding promissory
notes. Our current officers and directors were the officers and directors of Trxade Nevada.
Recapitalization of Common Stock by a Reverse Split and Increase of Authorized Shares of Stock
Pursuant to our Amended and Restated Certification of Incorporation, we increased the authorized shares of our
Common Stock from 200,000,000 shares to 500,000,000 shares, and authorized 100,000,000 shares of Preferred
Stock, including 10,000,000 shares of Series “A” Preferred Stock. We also effectuated a one thousand-for-one
(1,000:1) reverse stock split of our shares effective upon the closing of the Merger (the “Reverse Split”). As a result of
the Merger and the Reverse Split, 29,470,000 shares of our common stock were issued to the former Trxade Nevada
stockholders,
We also effectuated a reverse stock split at the ratio of one thousand-for-one (1,000:1) shares effective upon the
closing of the Merger (the “Reverse Split”). In connection with the split, the 104,160,000 outstanding shares of our
Common Stock, including the 80,000,000 shares held by Trxade Nevada, converted into 104,160 shares of Common
Stock. As a result of the Merger, Trxade Nevada Shareholders holding 28,800,000 shares of Common Stock and
670,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock converted their shares on one-to-one basis into 28,800,000 shares of our
Common Stock and 670,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, for an aggregate total of 29,470,000 shares.
Further, 600,000 shares of our common stock (on a post- Reverse Split basis) were issued following the merger in
connection with the conversion of our promissory notes. The 80,000,000 pre-merger shares held by Trxade Nevada,
which post-split amounted to 80,000 shares, revered to treasury stock of the company.
On June 11, 2015, pursuant to our Second Amended and Restated Certification of Incorporation, we decreased the
authorized shares of our Common Stock from 500,000,000 to 100,000,000 and decreased the authorized shares of
our Preferred Stock from 100,000,000 to 10,000,000.
Subsidiaries
We own 100% of Trxade Florida. This subsidiary is included in our attached financial statements and is engaged in the
same line of business as Trxade. Trxade Florida is a web-based market platform that enables trade among healthcare
buyers and sellers of pharmaceuticals, accessories and services.
5
We also own 100% of Westminster Pharmaceutical LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Westminster”).
Westminster was formed in January 2013 as a single member LLC wholly owned by Trxade Florida. This licensed
subsidiary is included in our attached financial statements and provides state-licensed pharmacies and buying groups in
the United States with pharmaceuticals approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”). In
late 2015 and early 2015 Westminster entered into multiple supply contracts with wholesale manufacturers of generic
pharmaceuticals to begin selling Westminster private label generic pharmaceuticals to our customers.
We own 100% of Pinnacle Tek, Inc., a Florida corporation founded by Mr. Ajjarapu in 2011. (“Pinnacle”). Pinnacle
Tek serves as a technology consultant provider that supports our programming needs and provides research on
pharmaceutical pricing and shortages in acute care and retail settings. Through July 2013, Pinnacle Tek was funded
entirely by cash contributions made by Mr. Ajjarapu. In July 2013, Trxade Nevada made the strategic decision to
acquire Pinnacle Tek pursuant to a merger in which each share of common stock of Pinnacle Tek owned by Mr.
Ajjarapu (the owner of 1 million shares of Pinnacle Tec’s common stock, representing 100% ownership) was
exchanged for three shares of common stock of Trxade Nevada, resulting in the issuance to Mr. Ajjarapu of 3,000,000
shares of common stock of Trxade Nevada. Pinnacle Tek is included in our attached financial statements. In early 2016
we discontinued the technology consulting business line under Pinnacle Tek. We do not believe this will have any
material effect on our operations going forward.
BUSINESS OF TRXADE
Our Principal Products and Services and their Markets.
Trxade.com: Trxade.com is a web-based pharmaceutical marketplace engaged in promoting and enabling trade among
independent pharmacies and large pharmaceutical suppliers nationally. Additional features include the ability of
independent pharmacies to trade among each other in currently 18 states that follow the Model State Pharmacy Act.
(The Model State Pharmacy Act and Model Rules of the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (Model Act)
provide the boards of pharmacy with model language that may be used when developing state laws or board rules.)
Other value-added components include access to Trxade’s proprietary pharmaceutical shortage database, data
analytics regarding medication pricing, and manufacturer return policies. We generate revenue from this service by
charging a transaction fee to the seller of the products for sales conducted via the Trxade platform. The buyers do not
bear the cost of transaction fees for the purchases that they make nor do they pay a fee to join or register with our
platform.
InventoryRx.com: InventoryRx.com is a web-based pharmaceutical marketplace formed to promote and enable trade
among suppliers, manufacturers and large healthcare facilities nationally. The seller of products and advertisers are
charged a transaction fee or posting fee for products sold or featured on the platform. To date, we have not generated
any revenue from this product.
Pharmabayonline: Pharmabayonline was created to provide access to proprietary pharmaceutical data analytics to
United States-based
independent pharmacies, pharmaceutical shortage databases, proposed governmental
reimbursement benchmarks comparison and analysis, and a proprietary suggested national retail drug benchmark. To
date no revenue has been generated from this service.
RxGuru: RxGuru is a service-based desktop software application designed to provide valid, daily drug pricing and
analytics to the independent pharmacist at time of care to enable their patients to realize cost savings on their
medications. This application works in conjunction with the Trxade platform but to date has not driven any revenue.
Westminster Pharmaceuticals: Westminster Pharmaceuticals buys US FDA approved prescription medication from
licensed pharmaceutical wholesalers and manufacturers. These products are delivered and stored at a licensed logistics
location in Olive Brach, MS and ready for delivery to our customer base once a product is sold. In late 2015 and early
2016 Westminster entered into multiple supply contracts with wholesale manufacturers of generic pharmaceuticals to
begin selling Westminster private label generic pharmaceuticals to our customers. Revenue is currently being generated
from the sale of private label products owned by Westminster.
Pinnacle Tek: Pinnacle Tek was our Information Technology consulting and staffing division, with particular focus on
pharmaceutical data research and analytics on product shortages and pricing benchmarks. This business line was not
profitable for the Company, and in early 2016 the company discontinued the Pinnacle Tek division. We do not believe
this will have any material effect on our operations going forward...
All our product offerings are focused on the US markets. Some products are restricted to certain states depending on
the various state regulations and guidelines pertaining to pharmaceuticals. Our services are distributed through our online
platform. Our wholesale division distributes pharmaceuticals to independent pharmacies in 26 states currently via a third
party logistics company.
6
The Pharmaceutical Industry
According to the 2013-14 Economic Report on Retail, Mail, and Specialty Pharmacies by Adam J. Fein, Ph.D. the US
pharmaceutical industry is a $330 billion industry consisting of over 65,000 pharmacy facilities and over 700 DEA-
registered and 1,500 State-licensed suppliers. There are very few platforms currently in place to bring these participants
together to share market knowledge, product pricing transparency and product availability. According to this, the
pharmaceutical market is comprised primarily of three wholesalers that control an estimated approximately 92% of the
market. Our management believes that this concentration has, over the years, led to a lack of price and cost
transparency, thereby resulting in severe limitations on the purchasing choices of industry participants. These market
dynamics have enabled these large wholesalers (McKesson, Cardinal Health and AmerisourceBergen), known as ADR
distributors, to dominate the industry with respect to both generic and brand pharmaceuticals. The increasing
concentration of generic medications (ANDA or Abbreviated New Drug Application), however, with many more
expected to go to market in the near future (approximately $80 billion branded medications will lose their patent
protection within the next ten years), have enabled smaller suppliers access to an increasing number of medications at
highly discounted prices. In essence, the market is slowly changing towards one where medications will become a
commoditized and trade influenced by price rather than the business relationships imposed upon the dominant
participants of the past.
To fuel this change, insurance companies (Pharmacy Benefits Management PBM and private health payers) and the
federal government have recently initiated lower medication reimbursement payments to healthcare providers. We
believe that pharmacies in due course will face increasing pressure to source medications as inexpensively as possible
and improve operational efficiency. Trxade seeks to be in the forefront of solving these transparency and pricing
concerns by providing independent, retail pharmacies with real-time, pharmacy acquisition cost “PAC” benchmarks to
the NDC level The National Drug Code (NDC) is a unique product identifier used in the United States for drugs
intended for human use.
Status of any publicly announced new products or services.
Our RxGuru application was launched in the first quarter of 2014 and complements Trxade.com’s efforts of delivering
timely information at time of purchase. Our industry leading price prediction model “RxGuru” integrates product
shortage insight into pharmacy acquisition benchmarks (“PAC”) to ascertain trends and pricing variances that result in
significant purchasing opportunities. “RX Guru” helps to predicts prices and affords our members an opportunity to
continuously benefit from real price purchasing opportunities that are often concealed from the rest of the industry.
InventoryRx, launched in the first quarter of 2014, is a web based pharmaceutical exchange platform where wholesalers
can purchase and sell pharmaceuticals and other over the counter medications among each other. The site offers these
trading partners greater product availability and pricing transparency and may substantially improve their buying
efficiency as well as lower their cost of goods on a continuous basis.
Westminster Pharmaceuticals, our private label pharmaceutical distributer, launched a strategic expansion. In late 2015
and early 2016 Westminster entered into multiple supply agreements with wholesale manufacturers of generic
pharmaceuticals to begin selling Westminster private label generic pharmaceuticals to our customers. Westminster has a
licensed storage and distribution facility in Olive Branch, MS. Revenue is currently being generated from the sale of
private label products owned by Westminster.
Competitive business conditions, the issuer’s competitive position in the industry, and methods of
competition.
We expect to face competition from the three large ADR distributors (McKesson, Cardinal Health &
AmerisourceBergen), other pharmaceutical distributors, buying groups, software products, and other start-up
companies. Most of these operations have substantially greater financial and manufacturer backed resources, longer
operating histories, greater name recognition and more established relationships in the industry.
Other Start-up Companies. We have identified a limited number of start-ups that provide pharmacy-to-pharmacy retail
wholesaling for their overstock pharmaceuticals. In addition, some start-ups provide for a supplier-pharmacy trading
such as PharmaBid, RxCherrypick, PharmSaver and GenericBid, and provide web-based services similar to ours,
allowing pharmacies to buy from several suppliers. Trxade differentiates itself from these exchanges by providing our
pharmacies with both brand and generic pharmaceutical products.
Buying Groups. Buying Groups provide discounted prices to their members by negotiating better pricing with one
primary wholesaler, while charging administration fees generally ranging from 3-5%. Some Buying Groups are
structured like co-operatives (IPC, API) and offer their members monthly or quarterly rebates. Although they can
function well to bring pricing competition to the industry, they often offer rebates only after the purchase and we don’t
believe they will provide long term savings to customers with this model given the increased transparency and
competition in the industry.
7
Pharmaceutical Software. Some pharmaceutical software companies compete with us on some levels. SureCost, for
example provides inventory management software that allows pharmacies to comply with primary supplier contracts.
This software is fee based, and requires training.
Moving forward. Some pharmacies may be reluctant to adapt to this format of buying due to the historical negativity
associated with purchasing pharmaceuticals on the internet and the uncertainty with respect to the origin and purity of
pharmaceuticals so purchased. Trxade management believes that as we continue to develop our brand, our customer
base, and our vast product offerings, we will gain the trust of the market and overcome the negativity associated with
purchasing via a pharmaceutical marketplace.
One advantage that we believe we have over our competition is our ability to be flexible and fast moving in adjusting our
business model to address the needs of our customer base. Trxade started by offering pharmacies a reverse auction
model to enhance savings on the purchase of their pharmaceuticals. Customer feedback suggested that pharmacies
prefer a more buy now format, which we implemented and then supplemented with a pharmacy-to-pharmacy trading
capability for all overstock pharmaceuticals. This resulted in a “one stop-one-search” platform to buy quality
pharmaceuticals for less and a data-rich platform to help pharmacies overcome the complexities related to supply chain
purchasing.
Sources and availability of raw materials and the names of principal suppliers.
Trxade is a web-based technology platform. Because we are not a manufacturing company, we don’t need any raw
materials. Our module on the platform is supplier-to-pharmacy trade. We bring buyers and sellers together on this
platform. Our suppliers include Bellco Generics, Independent Pharmacy Cooperative (IPC) and Bonita
Pharmaceuticals.
Dependence on one or a few major customers.
As of the date of this Form 10-K, we have over 5,000 pharmacies and over 15 pharmaceutical suppliers as customers,
with a market potential of approximately 24,000 independent pharmacies and 1,500 regional and local suppliers. We
have a working relationship with over 15 wholesalers and the nation’s largest buying group. Although we feel those
entities are satisfied with their business relationship with Trxade, if our buying group and two or three of the wholesalers
decided no longer to do business with Trxade, the resulting supplier void would materially and adversely affect our
competitiveness in the marketplace.
Intellectual Property
Although we believe that our name and brand are protected by common law trademark principals, other than Trxade
and pending trademarks on RxGuru and our pharmaceutical pricing benchmarks PAC, we do not currently have any
other registered trademarks, patents, concessions, licenses, royalty agreements, or franchises. Our business operates
under proprietary software system and various trade secrets within our database, business practices and pricing model.
Need for government approval of principle products and services.
We are required to hold business licenses and to follow applicable state and federal government regulations detailed
herein. Our wholesale division, which warehouses pharmaceutical products, requires requisite FDA and state approval,
which we have obtained.
Effect of existing or probable government regulations on the business.
Federal Drug Administration Guidelines
On April 12, 1988, President Ronald Reagan signed into law the Prescription Drug Marketing Act of 1987 (PDMA),
setting the baseline for wholesale distribution regulations. The final regulations were published in 1999, establishing the
minimum wholesale distribution requirements for state licensure. With the intent to prevent the introduction and retail sale
of substandard, ineffective, or counterfeit drugs into the distribution system, state licensing systems moved to update
their standards to match those provided federally as guided under FDA’s Guidelines for State Licensing of Wholesale
Prescription Drug Distributors (21 CFR 205). PDMA established minimum federal pedigree requirements to trace the
ownership of prescription drugs through the supply chain. The principal goal of the PDMA was to further secure the
nation’s drug supply from counterfeit and substandard prescription drugs. The law establishes two types of distributors:
“Authorized distributor[s] of record” or ADRs; and “Unauthorized distributor[s],” such as wholesalers. The pedigree
requirement was to require each person engaged in the wholesale distribution of a prescription drug in interstate
commerce, who is not the manufacturer or an authorized distributor of record for that drug, to provide a pedigree to the
recipient. After meeting resistance from various stakeholders, the FDA delayed the effective date of the regulations
several times, until final implementation in December 2006.
8
At the federal level the implementation of the track and trace legislation by 2017 will require the use of pharmaceutical
pedigree to track the movement of pharmaceuticals along the supply chain. The costs of complying with this new
legislation may be too burdensome for many of the smaller suppliers. Further, some state laws utilizing the Federal
Model Pharmacy Act may change or add rules that restrict pharmacy to pharmacy trading in the future. Current model
act laws allow for a pharmacy being able to trade 5% of their annual inventory with other pharmacies while most state
laws allow for retail pharmacies to be able to trade a product in national shortage status.
State Drug Administration Guidelines
There are a number of national and state wide regulations that have an effect on our business. All drug wholesalers must
be licensed under state licensing systems, which must in turn meet the FDA guidelines under State Licensing of
Wholesale Prescription Drug Distributors (21 CFR Part 205). The regulations set forth minimum requirements for
prescription drug storage and security as well as for the treatment of returned, damaged, and outdated prescription
drugs. Further, wholesale drug distributors must establish and maintain inventories and records of all transactions
regarding the receipt and distribution of prescription drugs and make these available for inspection and copying by
authorized federal, state, or local law enforcement officials. In most states, wholesale distributor licenses are issued by
the State Boards of Pharmacy and require periodic renewal. Approximately 40 states also require out-of-state
wholesalers that distribute drugs within their borders to be licensed as well.
States have statutes pertaining to the need to possess a wholesaler license for pharmacies to exchange pharmaceuticals
with other pharmacies. There are a number of states that allow pharmacies to exchange pharmaceuticals with other
pharmacies if the amount of the exchange does not exceed 5% of either pharmacy’s annual revenue generated from
prescription pharmaceuticals, without the need to acquire a wholesaler license. Some state pharmacy boards limit that
exchange to only emergency exchanges and many of those states define emergency exchanges to mean exchanges to
address temporary shortages. It is important to know the opinion taken by the board of pharmacy for each state
because these boards are initially responsible for interpreting the statute, and not their respective state attorney general.
Approximately 30 states currently have opined that pharmacy to pharmacy exchange does not require a pharmacy to
possess a wholesaler’s license. The interpretation of state statutes have changed, although the statutes have remained
unchanged.
California, Florida, Nevada, New Mexico and Indiana define the normal distribution channel to not include the lateral
sales of pharmaceuticals between wholesalers. The new Supply Chain Act, part of the Quality Drug Act, which was
signed into federal law in December 2013, precludes all states from restricting, investigating or inspecting the distribution
channel and transactional history. Until the federal government provides guidelines for the new federal law, no state
regulation or guideline exists. The transactional history regulation guidelines should be available in early 2015. Federal
licensing of wholesalers will take place in January 2017.
The warehousing of pharmaceuticals is also restricted and requires additional state licenses. Some licenses require
bonds and written exams and may take some time to approve. Currently, Westminster Pharmaceuticals, our wholesale
distributor, asks for formal pedigrees from the ADR wholesalers and provides pedigrees to those entities they sell to in
the marketplace. This requirement limits liability and provides assurance if a recall is warranted that Trxade and its
participants will receive value for the commodity.
Other Regulations:
Changes in state and federal regulations related to pharmacy-to-pharmacy trading may negatively impact that aspect of
our business. Individual state regulation changes can be expected from time to time regarding wholesaler distribution
activities and have the potential of increasing the cost of doing business in those states by influencing licensing
requirements, fees and thus elevating our administrative costs.
Research and Development.
During the last two fiscal years, Trxade.com, InventoryRx.com, Pharmabayonline and RxGuru have been developed as
proprietary software. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, $319,443 and $239,578 respectfully was
spent by the company in development activities. None of these expenses were borne directly by customers.
Cost of compliance with environmental laws.
We are not aware of any costs or effects of our compliance with environmental laws.
Employees
Currently, we have 48 employees. We also utilize numerous outside consultants.
9
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Business
Our business, financial condition and results of operations are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those
described below and elsewhere in this Report. This section discusses factors that, individually or in the aggregate, we
think could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results. Our business, financial
condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. It is not possible to
predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, the following are not to be a complete discussion of all potential risks
or uncertainties applicable to our business.
We have a limited operating history and expect to continue to incur losses for an indeterminate period of
times
We were incorporated in Delaware in 2005 and have never been profitable. Our current business model has been in
development since 2010 under a predecessor entity. As a result, we have a limited operating history upon which an
evaluation of our performance can be made. Revenues generated from the Company’s business operations for the years
ending December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015 were $955,881, $1,496,183 and $4,992,203, respectively. We incurred
operating losses for the years ending December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015 of ($2,084,004), ($2,016,853) and
($1,117,183), respectively. We expect to incur further losses in the foreseeable future due to the significant costs
associated with our business development, including costs associated with maintaining compliance under SEC reporting
standards. We cannot assure you that our operations will ever generate sufficient revenues to fund our continuing
operations or to fully implement our business plan, that we will ever generate positive cash flow from our operations, or
that we will attain or thereafter sustain profitability in any future period.
The likelihood of our success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and
delays frequently encountered in connection with the start and growth of a business, the implementation of the
Company’s business plan, and the regulatory environment affecting the distribution of pharmaceuticals in which the
Company operates.
If we do not obtain additional financing, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of
operations will be adversely affected.
The Company anticipates that it will require substantial working capital for the Company to pursue continued
development of products and service and marketing operations. The timing and amount of such capital requirements
cannot be accurately predicted. Additional financing may not be available to the Company when needed or, if available,
it may not be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If the Company is not able to obtain the necessary additional
financing on a timely basis, the Company will be forced to delay or scale down some or all of its development activities
or perhaps even cease the operation of its business.
The Company has no commitments for any additional financing, and there can be no assurance that any such
commitments can be obtained on favorable terms, if at all. Any additional equity financing will be dilutive to the
Company’s stockholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants with respect to dividends,
raising future capital and other financial and operational matters. If the Company is unable to obtain additional financing
as needed, the Company may be required to reduce the scope of its operations or its anticipated expansion, which
could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Many of our competitors are better established and have resources significantly greater than we have, which
may make it difficult to fend off competition.
The Company expects to compete with the three large ADR distributors (McKesson, Cardinal Health &
AmerisourceBergen), other pharmaceutical distributors, buying groups, software products, and other start-up
companies. Many of these operations have substantially greater financial and manufacturer-backed resources, longer
operating histories, greater name recognition and more established relationships in the industry than our company. In
addition, a number of these competitors may combine or form strategic partnerships. As a result, our competitors may
be able to control a more favorable basis in regard to pricing or other factors. Our failure to compete successfully with
any of these companies would have a material adverse effect on our business and the trading price of our common
stock.
The three distributors listed above have a strong control over the industry, as they have contracts with the 24,000
independent, retail pharmacies that limit the participants’ ability to purchase pharmaceuticals outside of those primary
distributors. Additional restrictive elements exist within the pharmaceutical channel of distribution. For example, a
number of the inventory management systems, either developed by the distributors or third party vendors, have been
developed to require compliance to these restrictive purchasing agreements.
10
Moreover, we expect that other existing and prospective competitors will adopt technologies or business plans similar to
ours, or seek other means to develop operations competitive with ours, particularly if our development of large-scale
production progresses as scheduled.
We will need to expand our member base and/or our profit margins to attain profitability
Currently, we are paid an administrative fee of up to 6% of the buying price on the generic pharmaceuticals sold to
pharmacies and up to 1% on brand pharmaceuticals that pass through our pharmaceutical exchanges. Westminster
Pharmaceuticals, LLC, our wholesale company, was created to take advantage of the higher margins generally realized
by wholesalers that provide fulfillment services to pharmacies. Westminster is still in the early stages of its development,
requires substantial capital investment and we have not achieved profitability in this division.
Our management is aware that the competitiveness of the group of suppliers that participate in our system and price
products on our exchange is a key factor in determining how many purchasing pharmacies and wholesalers will purchase
products through our platforms. However, price is not the only factor that influences where retail pharmacies will obtain
their product. Quality fulfillment services is also important, and retail pharmacies have historically received quality
fulfillment services from the three major ADR distributors. In order to be more competitive, we must improve our
customer service and fulfillment efforts, because the independent, retail pharmacy has for years considered this element
of the fulfillment process as important as price. Other factors influencing the pharmacies purchasing behavior in the future
will be changes brought upon by The Affordable Care Act, which regulates some aspects of pharmaceutical spending
and pricing. In this regard we should benefit substantially from our pricing and product shortage knowledge that is
offered by our platform.
Profitability may be further increased as a result of lower cost of goods should Westminster Pharmaceuticals, LLC build
stronger relationships with manufacturers and other larger buying groups that server wholesalers/ distributors (examples
include OptiSource International, Premier Wholesaler, Innovatix, LLC, etc.). On a larger scale those margins will drop
depending upon the breath of products provided in the market and the sale turn rates required. Westminster
Pharmaceuticals, LLC can participate and sell products in Trxade or Inventory RX without possessing a comprehensive
inventory of products because those exchanges have numerous suppliers for each product. At our current rate of
expenses and revenue, we must increase sales two-fold in order to breakeven. We are currently undertaking a
significant effort expand our Private Label sales under Westminster, to increase our membership base through
attendance at annual conferences and other strategies. Trxade has also introduced a new telemarketing system and an
expanded e-mail marketing strategy based on our competitive price advantages and product shortage and price trend
analysis tools.
There are inherent risks associated with our operations within the Pharmaceutical Distribution Markets
There are inherent risks involved with doing business within the pharmaceutical distribution channel, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Product Use Liability: Improperly manufactured products may prove dangerous to the end consumer.
Distribution Product Liability: Products may become adulterated by improper warehousing methods or
modes of shipment.
Counterfeit Products or products with fake pedigree papers.
Unlicensed or unlawful participants in the distribution channel.
Risk with default and the assumption of credit loss.
Risk related to the loss of supply, or the loss of a number of suppliers.
Market Acceptance of our Private Label products.
Although all of our end-user agreements require our customers to indemnify us and for any and all liabilities resulting
from our participation in the pharmaceutical distribution industry, we cannot assure you that the parties required to
provide such indemnification will have the financial resources to do so. Additionally, although we have evaluated
appropriate state statutes and federal laws pertaining to pharmaceutical distribution in an effort to diminish our risks, the
Board of Pharmacy for each state is responsible for interpreting their state laws, and their interpretations may not
comport with our analysis. It is also possible that any third party logistics arrangements may disrupt service, create a loss
of income, or other unforeseen disruptions should the service provider experience any legal, financial or other difficulties
of their own.
11
Regulatory changes that affect our distribution channel could harm our business
Certain states (CA, FL, NV, NM & IN) have enacted laws that prohibit lateral movement of pharmaceuticals within the
distribution channel. These laws prohibit wholesalers from selling pharmaceuticals directly from or to other wholesalers
where they maintain inventory. Other states may in the future enact similar laws that place restrictions in pharmaceutical
trading within the Trxade platforms. At the federal level, the implementation of the track and trace legislation by 2017
requiring the use of pharmaceutical pedigree may restrict and disrupt the movement of pharmaceuticals along the supply
chain should the cost of complying with this new legislation be too burdensome for smaller suppliers. In addition, some
state laws utilizing the Federal Model Pharmacy Act may change or add rules that restrict pharmacy to pharmacy
trading in the future. Current model act laws permit pharmacies to trade 5% of their annual inventory with other
pharmacies while most state laws allow for retail pharmacies to be able to trade a product in national shortage status.
We may apply working capital and future funding to uses that ultimately do not improve our operating
results or increase the value of your investment.
In general, the Company has complete discretion over the use of its working capital and any new investment capital it
may in the future obtain. Because of the number and variety of factors that could determine the Company’s use of funds,
there can be no assurances that such uses will not vary substantially from the Company’s current operating plan.
We intend to use existing working capital and future funding to support the development of our products and services,
product purchases in our wholesale distribution division, the expansion of our marketing and/or the support of
operations to educate our customers. We will also use capital for market and network expansion, acquisitions and
general working capital purposes. However, we do not have more specific plans for our capital and our management
will have broad discretion in how we use available capital reserves. Our capital could be applied in ways that do not
improve our operating results or otherwise increase the value of a shareholder’s investment.
We do not have a traditional credit facility with a financial institution, which may adversely impact our
operations.
We do not have a traditional credit facility with a financial institution, such as a working line of credit. The absence of
such a facility could adversely impact our operations, as it may constrain our ability to have available the working capital
for equipment purchases or other operational requirements. If adequate funds are not otherwise available, we may be
required to delay, scale back or eliminate portions of our business development efforts. Without credit facilities, the
Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our securities could lose their entire investment.
We are dependent upon our current management, who may have conflicts of interest.
The Company is dependent upon the efforts of its current management. All of our officers and directors have duties and
affiliations with other companies. Even though these companies are not competitors or involved in pharmaceutical
distribution, involvement of our officers and directors may still present a conflict of interest regarding decisions they
make for Trxade or with respect to the amount of time available for Trxade. The loss of any officer or director of the
Company and in particular, Mr. Patel or Mr. Ajjarapu, could have a material adverse effect upon our business and
future prospects.
The Company does not presently have key-man life insurance upon the life of any of its officers or directors. While our
management team has considerable information technology and entrepreneurial experience, none of our management
was been involved in pharmaceutical distribution prior to joining the Company and, as such, did not have any technical
experience in pharmaceutical distribution prior to joining the Company. Upon adequate funding, management intends to
hire qualified and experienced personnel, including additional officers and directors, and specialists, professionals and
consulting firms to advise management as needed; however, there can be no assurance that management will be
successful in raising the necessary funds in respect of recruiting, hiring and retaining such qualified individuals and firms.
We plan to implement an aggressive growth strategy, which could increase the risk of failure.
For the foreseeable future, the Company intends to pursue an aggressive growth strategy for the expansion of its
operations through product development distribution and marketing. The Company’s ability to rapidly expand its
operations will depend upon many factors, including the Company’s ability to work in a regulated environment, market
value added products effectively to independent pharmacies, establish and maintain strategic relationships with suppliers,
and obtain adequate capital resources on acceptable terms. Any restrictions on the Company’s ability to expand may
have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition. Accordingly,
there are no assurances that the Company will be able to achieve its targets for sales growth, or that the Company’s
operations will be successful or achieve anticipated operating results.
12
We rely on third-party contracts.
We depend on others to provide products and services to the Company. We do not manufacture pharmaceuticals and
we do not sell pharmaceuticals to the end consumer. We do not control these wholesalers, suppliers and purchasers and
although our arrangements with them will be terminable or of limited length, a change may be difficult to implement. At
this time, we have a working relationship with over fifteen wholesalers and the nation’s largest buying group. Although
we feel those entities are satisfied with their business relationship with Trxade, if our buying group and two or three of
the wholesalers decided no longer to do business with us, that supplier void would materially and adversely affect our
competitiveness in the marketplace.
It may be difficult and costly for us to comply with the extensive government regulations to which our
business may be subject.
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation by the U.S. federal and state government. In addition as the company
expands operations it may also become subject to the regulations of foreign jurisdictions. We may also become subject
to additional regulations relating to environmental matters, transportation of pharmaceutical products, shipping
restrictions, and import and export restrictions.
Further, the enactment of new rules and regulations could adversely affect our business. For example, The Affordable
Care Act has a primary goal of reducing the cost of healthcare and providing medical coverage to some of the nation’s
25 million uninsured. Depending on its future enforcement or additional rules and regulations created around it,
pharmaceutical pricing control could be established resulting in substantially reduced margins and reimbursement for
pharmacies and all other healthcare provider bases. In turn this may adversely affect our cash flow, profitability, and
growth.
We will continue to incur increased costs as a result of being a reporting company, and given our limited
capital resources, such additional costs may have an adverse impact on our profitability.
We are an SEC reporting company. The rules and regulations under the Exchange Act require reporting companies to
provide periodic reports with interactive data files, which require that we engage legal, accounting and auditing
professionals, and XBRL and EDGAR service providers. The engagement of such services can be costly and the
Company may continue to incur additional losses, which may adversely affect the Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as a variety of related rules implemented by the
SEC, have required changes in corporate governance practices and generally increased the disclosure requirements of
public companies. For example, as a result of being a reporting company, we are be required to file periodic and current
reports and other information with the SEC and we have adopted policies regarding disclosure controls and procedures
and regularly evaluate those controls and procedures.
The additional costs we continue to incur in connection with becoming a reporting company (expected to be several
hundred thousand dollars per year) will continue to further stretch our limited capital resources. Due to our limited
resources, we have to allocate resources away from other productive uses in order to continue to comply with our
obligations as an SEC reporting company. Further, there is no guarantee that we will have sufficient resources to
continue to meet our reporting and filing obligations with the SEC as they come due.
RISKS RELATED TO THE OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK
We are subject to the “penny stock” rules which will adversely affect the liquidity of our common stock.
The Company’s stock is defined as a “penny stock” under Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act. In general, a “penny
stock” includes securities of companies which are not listed on the principal stock exchanges or NASDAQ and have a
bid price in the market of less than $5.00; and companies with net tangible assets of less than $2,000,000 ($5,000,000
if the issuer has been in continuous operation for less than three years), or which has recorded revenues of less than
$6,000,000 in the last three years. “Penny stocks” are subject to rule 15g-9, which imposes additional sales practice
requirements on broker-dealers that sell such securities to persons other than established customers and “accredited
investors” (generally, individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual incomes exceeding $200,000, or
$300,000 together with their spouses, or individuals who are officers or directors of the issuer of the securities). For
transactions covered by Rule 15g-9, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and
have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to sale. Consequently, this rule may adversely
affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell the Company’s stock, and therefore, may adversely affect the ability of the
Company’s stockholders to sell stock in the public market.
The sale of shares by our directors and officers may adversely affect the market price for our shares.
Sales of significant amounts of shares held by our officers and directors, or the prospect of these sales, could adversely
affect the market price of our common stock. Management’s stock ownership may discourage a potential acquirer from
making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, which in turn could reduce our stock price or
prevent our stockholders from realizing a premium over our stock price.
13
A significant number of our shares are eligible for sale and their sale or potential sale may depress the
market price of our common stock.
Sales of a significant number of shares of our common stock in the public market could harm the market price of our
common stock. As additional shares of our common stock become available for resale in the public market, the supply
of our common stock will increase, which could decrease its price. Some or all of our shares of common stock may be
offered from time to time in the open market pursuant to compliance with Rule 144, which sales could have a depressive
effect on the market for our shares of common stock. Subject to certain restrictions, a person who has held restricted
shares for a period of six months may sell common stock into the market.
The limitation of monetary liability against the Company’s directors, officers and employees under
Delaware law and the existence of indemnification rights to the Company’s directors, officers and
employees may result in substantial expenditures by the Company and may discourage lawsuits against the
Company’s directors, officers and employees.
The Company’s articles of incorporation contain a specific provision that limits the liability of directors for monetary
damages to the Company and the Company’s stockholders. We also have contractual indemnification obligations under
our employment and engagement agreements with our executive officers and directors. The foregoing indemnification
obligations could result in the Company incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage
awards against directors and officers, which the Company may be unable to recoup. These provisions and resultant
costs may also discourage the Company from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their
fiduciary duties and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by the Company’s stockholders against the
Company’s directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit the Company and its
stockholders.
There is a limited market for our shares; our common stock is thinly quoted, so you may be unable to sell at
or near bid prices or at all if you need to sell your shares to raise money or otherwise desire to liquidate your
shares.
Our Common Stock is traded on OTCBB under the symbol TRXD. The OTCBB is a quotation service for the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) market makers, and not an issuer listing service or securities market.
There is no minimum bid price requirement. OTCBB companies are not considered to be “listed.” There are, however,
certain requirements an issuer must meet in order for its securities to be eligible for a market maker to enter a quotation
on the OTCBB, including that the security be registered with the SEC and the issuer be current in its required filings.
Our Common Stock is very thinly traded, and a robust and active trading market may never develop. Our common
stock will likely continue to be sporadically or “thinly-quoted,” meaning that the number of persons interested in
purchasing our common stock at or near ask prices at any given time may be relatively small or nonexistent. This
situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is relatively
unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or
influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would
be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until
such time as we became more seasoned and viable.
As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-
existent, as compared to a mature issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally
support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. It is possible that a broader or more active public
trading market for our common stock will not develop or be sustained, or that trading levels will not continue.
Our stock may be traded on the OTCQB. The OTCQB is an electronic quotation system operated by OTC Markets
Group that displays quotes from broker-dealers for many over-the-counter securities. These securities tend to be
inactively quoted stocks, including penny stocks and those with a narrow geographic interest. Market makers and other
brokers can use OTC Markets to publish their bid and ask quotation prices. The OTC Markets is not a stock
exchange. To be quoted in the OTC Markets, companies do not need to fulfill any financial requirements. The
companies quoted in the OTC Markets tend to be closely held, extremely small, and thinly quoted. Most do not meet
the minimum U.S. listing requirements for trading on a stock exchange such as the New York Stock Exchange.
We have never paid or declared any dividends on our common stock.
We have never paid or declared any dividends on our common stock or preferred stock. Likewise, we do not
anticipate paying, in the near future, dividends or distributions on our common stock. Any future dividends on common
stock will be declared at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend, among other things, on our earnings,
our financial requirements for future operations and growth, and other facts as we may then deem appropriate.
14
Our directors have the right to authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock and additional shares of
our common stock.
Our directors, within the limitations and restrictions contained in our articles of incorporation and without further action
by our stockholders, have the authority to issue shares of preferred stock from time to time in one or more series and to
fix the number of shares and the relative rights, conversion rights, voting rights, and terms of redemption, liquidation
preferences and any other preferences, special rights and qualifications of any such series. Any issuance of shares of
preferred stock could adversely affect the rights of holders of our common stock. Should we issue additional shares of
our common stock at a later time, each investor’s ownership interest in our stock would be proportionally reduced.
If we fail to remain current in our reporting requirements on the OTCBB, where we are publically quoted,
we could be removed from the OTCBB, which would limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities
and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.
Companies whose shares are quoted for sale on the OTCBB and the OTCQB must be reporting issuers under Section
12 of the Exchange Act, and must be current in their reports under Section 13 of the Exchange Act, in order to maintain
price quotation privileges on the OTCQB and OTCBB. If we fail to remain current in our reporting requirements, we
could be removed from the OTCBB or OTCQB. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be adversely
affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities
in the secondary market.
The market price for our common stock is particularly volatile, given our status as a relatively unknown
company with a small and thinly quoted public float, and lack of profitability, which could lead to wide
fluctuations in our share price.
The market for our common stock on the OTCBB will most likely continue to be characterized by significant price
volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will be more volatile than a seasoned
issuer for the indefinite future. The volatility in our share price would be attributable to a number of factors. First, as
noted above, the shares of our common stock will likely be sporadically and/or thinly quoted. As a consequence of this
lack of liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our stockholders may disproportionately influence
the price of those shares in either direction. The price for our shares could, for example, decline precipitously in the
event that a large number of shares of our common stock are sold on the market without commensurate demand, as
compared to a seasoned issuer which could better absorb those sales without adverse impact on its share price.
Anti-takeover provisions may impede the acquisition of Trxade.
Certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) have anti-takeover effects and may inhibit a
non-negotiated merger or other business combination. These provisions are intended to encourage any person interested
in acquiring Trxade to negotiate with, and to obtain the approval of, our directors, in connection with such a transaction.
As a result, certain of these provisions may discourage a future acquisition of Trxade, including an acquisition in which
the stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares.
If we fail to establish and maintain an effective system of internal control, we may not be able to report our
financial results accurately or to prevent fraud. Any inability to report and file our financial results
accurately and timely could harm our business and adversely impact the trading price of our common stock.
Effective internal control is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. If we cannot provide
reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, we may not be able to manage our business as effectively as we would if an
effective control environment existed, and our business, brand and reputation with investors may be harmed.
In addition, reporting a material weakness may negatively impact investors’ perception of us. We have allocated, and
will continue to allocate, significant additional resources to remedy any deficiencies in our internal control. There can be
no assurances that our remedial measures will be successful in curing the any material weakness or that other significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses will not arise in the future.
Our Chief Executive Officer and President are also our two largest stockholders, and as a result they can
exert control over us and have actual or potential interests that may diverge from yours.
Suren Ajjarapu, our CEO, and Prashant Patel, our President, beneficially own, in the aggregate, over 84% of our
Common Stock. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, will be able to influence many matters requiring
stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of mergers and other significant corporate
transactions. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in
control, and could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares of common stock as
part of a sale of our company and may affect the market price of our stock.
15
Further, Mr. Ajjarapu and Mr. Patel may have interests that diverge from those of other holders of our common stock.
As a result, Mr. Ajjarapu and Mr. Patel may vote the shares they own or control or otherwise cause us to take actions
that may conflict with your best interests as a stockholder, which could adversely affect our results of operations and the
trading price of our common stock.
Through this control, Mr. Ajjarapu and Mr. Patel can control our management, affairs and all matters requiring
stockholder approval, including the approval of significant corporate transactions, a sale of our company, decisions
about our capital structure and the composition of our Board of Directors.
Our stock price might be volatile.
The price of our stock may be highly volatile and could be subject to fluctuations in price in response to various factors,
some of which are beyond our control. These factors include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of our competitors;
announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, new products, significant contracts, commercial
relationships or capital commitments;
disruption to our operations or those of other sources critical to our operations;
the emergence of new competitors;
our ability to develop and market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;
seasonal or other variations;
commencement of, or our involvement in, litigation;
dilutive issuances of our stock or the stock of our subsidiaries, or the incurrence of additional debt;
changes in our board or management;
adoption of new or different accounting standards;
changes in governmental regulations or in the status of our regulatory approvals;
changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;
general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of related markets.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Description of Property
We do not own any real property. We lease office space at: (1) 1115 Gunn Hwy, Odessa, Florida 33556 from
December 1, 2014 for approximately $121,838 per year under a 3 year lease agreement, occupying approximately
9000 square feet.
Westminster Pharmaceuticals LLC has a facility in Olive Branch, MS to receive, warehouse and ship pharmaceuticals.
The space is leased for approximately $38,400 per year under a monthly lease agreement, occupying approximately
5000 square feet.
We believe our current and future facilities are adequate for our current and near-term needs. Additional space may be
required as we expand our activities. We do not currently foresee any significant difficulties in obtaining any required
additional facilities.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In addition to the legal matters below, in the ordinary course of business, we may become a party to lawsuits involving
various matters. The impact and outcome of litigation, if any, is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in
these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We believe the ultimate resolution of any
such current proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on our continued financial position, results of operations
or cash flows
On November 19, 2015, Family Medicine Pharmacy, LLC filed a class-action claim against Trxade Group, Inc. and its
wholly owned subsidiary Westminster Pharmaceutical, LLC, Inc. (Family Medicine Pharmacy, LLC v. Trxade Group,
Inc. and Westminster, Inc., Case No.: 1:15-CV-00590-KD-B, United States District Court, Southern District of
Alabama, Mobile Division). Family Medicine has served Trxade for allegedly utilizing a “junk fax” advertising program.
Family Medicine seeks statutory damages on behalf of a class of similarly situated entities throughout the United States.
The litigation is in its preliminary stages, and discovery has not yet commenced. Although management denies any
material liability and the propriety of class certification in this lawsuit, the litigation could have a lengthy duration, it is
more likely than not that damages and/or settlement costs will be incurred, and the ultimate outcome cannot be
predicted at this time.
16
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Holders
According to the records of our transfer agent, as of December 31, 2015, there were approximately 55 holders of
record of our common stock, not including any persons who hold their stock in “street name.”
Market Information
Our common stock has been quoted on the OTCBB tier of the marketplace maintained by OTC Markets Group, Inc.
under the symbol “TRXD” after filing a Form 10 Registration Statement, since June 2014. Prior to June 2014, our stock
has traded on pink sheets and on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board after filing a Form SB-2 Registration Statement
in 2007. Our common stock trades on a limited and sporadic basis and should not be deemed to constitute an
established public trading market. There is no assurance that there will be liquidity in the common stock.
The following table sets forth the high and low bid price for each quarter within the fiscal years ended December 31,
2014 and 2015, as provided by OTC Markets Group, Inc. The information reflects prices between dealers, and does
not include retail markup, markdown, or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.
Fiscal Year
2014
2015
Period
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Bid Prices
High
Bid Prices
Low
15.00
3.00
1.75
1.85
1.70
1.75
1.50
1.25
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1.50
.15
1.35
1.25
1.50
1.15
.55
.50
The Securities Enforcement and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 requires additional disclosure relating to the market
for penny stocks in connection with trades in any stock defined as a penny stock. The Commission has adopted
regulations that generally define a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per
share, subject to a few exceptions which we do not meet. Unless an exception is available, the regulations require the
delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market
and the risks associated therewith.
Dividends
The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock. The Company currently anticipates that it will
retain all future earnings for use in its business. Consequently, it does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the
foreseeable future. The payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our results of operations, as well as our
short-term and long-term cash availability, working capital, working capital needs and other factors, as determined by
our Board of Directors. Currently, except as may be provided by applicable laws, there are no contractual or other
restrictions on our ability to pay dividends if we were to decide to declare and pay them.
17
Common Stock
The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock with $0.00001 par value per share. Holders
of shares of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on each matter submitted to a vote of shareholders. In the
event of liquidation, holders of common stock are entitled to share pro rata in the distribution of assets remaining after
payment of liabilities, if any. Holders of common stock have no cumulative voting rights, and, accordingly, the holders of
a majority of the outstanding shares have the ability to elect all of the directors of the Company. Holders of common
stock have no preemptive or other rights to subscribe for shares. Holders of common stock are entitled to such
dividends as may be declared by the Board out of funds legally available therefore. The outstanding shares of common
stock are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
Preferred Stock
The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.00001 par value per share, all of which
10,000,000 undesignated. In August 2014, each then outstanding share of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
converted into one share of our common stock. The Company had no preferred shares outstanding at December 31,
2015 or as of the date of this filing.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2015, with respect to our compensation plans under
which common stock is authorized for issuance.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected in
Column A)
(C)
Number of
securities
to be issued
upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
(A)
Weighted-
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
(B)
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders (1)
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders (3)
Total
1,190,000
435,000
1,625,000
1.06
1.00
1.04
810,000(2)
810,000
(1)Consists of (i) options to purchase 820,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding under the Trxade Group, Inc. 2014
Equity Incentive Plan, (ii) options to purchase 370,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding under the Trxade
Group, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.
(2)Consists of 2,000,000 shares of common stock reserved and available for issuance under the Trxade Group, Inc. 2014 Equity
Incentive Plan.
(3)Consists of (i) warrants to purchase 435,000 shares of common stock granted by Trxade Group, Inc., and our predecessor in
interest to consultants in October 2013.
Stock Transfer Agent
Our Stock Transfer Agent is Action Stock Transfer, 2469 E. Fort Union Blvd, Suite 214, Salt Lake City, UT 84121.
18
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the past year, we issued and sold the following securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (the “Securities Act”):
A convertible promissory note purchase agreement was executed in the amount of $1,500,000 in October 2015, with
the principal delivered in three tranches. Funding of $450,000 was completed for the first tranche of the loan in October
2015. The second tranche of $500,000 was completed in December 31, 2015 and the third tranche remains pending,
the term of the notes are three years. Interest payments are based on a profit percentage of specific operations of the
company’s wholesale distribution division, Westminster Pharmaceuticals, LLC, payable each quarter. Prior to maturity
the notes may be converted for shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $2.50 per share. In further
consideration of the convertible promissory note, the holder of the note was granted security purchase warrants at one
common stock for every $3.00 of the note amount. These included warrants to purchase 160,000 and 166,666 shares
of common stock on October 2015 and December 31, 2015, respectively. All warrants were issued at a strike price of
$0.01, with an expiration date of five years from date of issuance. The proceeds from these convertible notes were used
for general working capital purposes and to fund the Westminster Pharmaceuticals, LLC division.
Convertible promissory notes were issued in the aggregate amount of $200,000 in April and May 2015. The term of
these notes are one year. Simple interest of 10% is payable at the maturity date of the note. Prior to maturity the notes
may be converted for common stock at a conversion price of $1.50. The holders of the notes were also granted
warrants to purchase one share of common stock for every $4.00 of the note amount, for a total of 50,000 warrants,
which were issued at a strike price of $1.50 and an expiration date of five years from date of issuance.
The issuances and grants described above were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2), Rule 506 of
Regulation D and/or Regulation S of the Securities Act since the foregoing issuances and grants did not involve a public
offering, the recipients took the securities for investment and not resale, we took take appropriate measures to restrict
transfer, and the recipients were (a) “accredited investors”; (b) had access to similar documentation and information as
would be required in a Registration Statement under the Act; (c) were non-U.S. persons; and/or (d) were officers or
directors of the Company.
With respect to any exchanges or conversions of our outstanding securities discussed above, we claim an exemption
from registration afforded by Section 3(a)(9) of the Act for the above conversions, as the securities were exchanged by
our company with its existing security holders exclusively in transactions where no commission or other remuneration
was paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting such exchange.
Repurchase of Securities
The Company did not purchase any shares of its common stock during the year ended December 31, 2015.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Not applicable to a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is provided in
addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results
of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. MD&A is organized as follows:
··
··
··
··
Overview. Discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting us, to
provide context for the remainder of MD&A.
Liquidity and Capital Resources. An analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows and discussion
of our financial condition.
Results of Operations. An analysis of our financial results comparing the twelve months ended December 31,
2015 and 2014.
Critical Accounting Policies. Accounting estimates that we believe are important to understanding the
assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts.
19
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes included elsewhere in this report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements regarding future
events and the future results of the Company that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and
projections about the industry in which the Company operates and the beliefs and assumptions of the management of the
Company. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,”
“seeks,” “estimates,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and
assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those
expressed in any forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are
not limited to, those discussed elsewhere in this Report, particularly under “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors,” and in other
reports we file with the SEC. All references to years relate to the calendar year ended December 31 of the particular
year. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any
reason. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this
Report.
The following discussion is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report, which
have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingencies. In the course of operating our business, we routinely
make decisions as to the timing of the payment of invoices, the collection of receivables, the shipment of products, the
fulfillment of orders, the purchase of supplies, and the building of inventory, among other matters. Each of these
decisions has some impact on the financial results for any given period. In making these decisions, we consider various
factors including contractual obligations, customer satisfaction, competition, internal and external financial targets and
expectations, and financial planning objectives. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related
to sales returns, pricing credits, warranty costs, allowance for doubtful accounts, impairment of long-term assets,
especially goodwill and intangible assets, contract manufacturer exposures for carrying and obsolete material charges,
assumptions used in the valuation of stock-based compensation, and litigation. We base our estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Company Overview
We have designed and developed, and now own and operate business-to-business web based marketplace focused on
the US pharmaceutical industry. Our core service brings the nation’s independent pharmacies and accredited national
suppliers of pharmaceuticals together to provide efficient and transparent buying and selling opportunities.
We began operations under Trxade Nevada in August of 2010 and spent over two years creating and enhancing our
web-based services. Our services provide enhanced pricing transparency, purchasing capabilities and other value added
services on a single platform to focus on serving the nation’s approximately 24,000 independent pharmacies with an
annual purchasing power of $96 billion. Our national supplier partners are able to fulfill orders on our platform
immediately and provide the pharmacy with cost saving payment terms and next day delivery capabilities in unrestrictive
states under the Model State Pharmacy Act and Model Rules of the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy
(Model Act). Important additions to this platform further include the generation of pharmacy to pharmacy trading
capabilities to help independents with their overstocked inventories in a more organized manner. We expanded rapidly
in 2015 and now have over 5,000 registered pharmacy members purchasing on our platform.
In December 2013 we launched a second service to help pharmaceutical distributors better source their pharmaceutical
needs within a highly structured single platform. This solution is designed to help purchasers overcome pharmaceutical
supply issues related to drug shortages, as a means to control costs on drugs with volatile pricing and to help buyers
make better purchasing choices based on their needs.
Additionally, we built and, in February 2014, launched, a new desktop application, named RxGuru, to bring product
information on a just in time basis to our member base. Our pharmacy members should benefit from this application by
gaining advanced data analytics at point of purchase and patient care. RxGuru has been upgraded to continue the benefit
to the pharmacies.
Lastly, in 2015Westminster Pharmaceuticals, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary and distribution division launched its
private label pharmaceutical product program, and has entered into various supply contracts with pharmaceutical
manufactures to supply Westminster with generic pharmaceutical products on a private label basis to sell to our
customers. In connection with this expansion, Westminster and received significant funding in late 2015 and early 2016.
20
Company Organization
Trxade Group, Inc. (“Company”) owns 100% of Trxade, Inc., Westminster Pharmaceutical LLC and Pinnacle Tek,
Inc. The reverse subsidiary merger of Trxade, Inc. and Trxade Group, Inc. occurred in May 2013. Pinnacle Tek was
merged through a subsidiary with Trxade Group, Inc. in July 2013. Westminster Pharmaceutical LLC was formed in
January 2013.
Trxade, Inc. is a web based market platform that enables trade among healthcare buyers and sellers of pharmaceuticals,
accessories and services.
Westminster Pharmaceutical LLC, provides US state licensed pharmacies and other buying groups with FDA approved
pharmaceuticals under a private label program.
Pinnacle Tek, Inc. was the Company’s wholly-owned technology consulting division. This division is no longer active
and has no material impact on the Company’s operation results.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents were $860,132 at December 31, 2015. We expect that our future available capital
resources will consist primarily of cash generated from operations, remaining cash balances, borrowings, and any
additional funds raised through sales of debt and/or equity.
Liquidity
Cash and cash equivalents, current assets, current liabilities, short term debt and working capital at the end of
each period were as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents
Current assets (excluding cash and cash equivalents)
Current liabilities (excluding short term debt)
Short term debt
Working Capital
December 31,
2015
December
31, 2014
$
860,132 $
1,167,538
652,962
399,303
975,405
705,602
512,714
553,677
-
664,639
Our principal sources of liquidity have been cash provided by operations, equity capital and borrowings under various
debt arrangements. Our principal uses of cash have been for operating expenses, inventory purchases and private label
distribution agreements. We anticipate these uses will continue to be our principal uses of cash in the future.
The increase in our current assets was primarily due to a $950,000 in convertible long term debt, $200,000 in
convertible short term debt and $250,000 in short term notes. Accounts receivable and prepaid assets increased by
$149,075 and $143,685 respectfully.
Current liabilities increase is primarily due to an increase in accounts payable by $61,992 and accrued liabilities of
$122,108. The accrued liabilities increase is primarily accrued management wages from executive employment
contracts. In 2015, we funded our operations through cash-flow, short term debt issuance of $450,000 together with
warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock. During November and December we sold $950,000 in
convertible securities together with warrants to purchase 326,667 shares of common stock. For additional discussion of
our various debt arrangements see Note 5. Notes Payable of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV
of this Form 10-K.
21
Liquidity Outlook
Cash Requirements
Our primary objectives for 2016 are to continue the development of the Trxade Platform and increase our client base
and operational revenue. Additional funds will be needed to continue to expand our platform and customer base, and
cover general and administrative expense. We expect to pursue raising capital to fund our operations and provide
personnel to expand operations and required working capital. Through these efforts, management believe the Company
will be able to obtain the liquidity necessary to fund company operations for the foreseeable future, however there is no
assurance that our operations will generate significant positive cash flow, or that additional funds will be available to us,
through borrowings or otherwise, on favorable terms when required, or at all.
We estimate our operating expenses and working capital requirements for the next 12 months to be approximately as
follows:
Expense
Cost of Sales (1)
General and administrative (2)
Total
Amount
5,300,000
2,400,000
7,700,000
$
$
$
(1)
(2)
Includes the cost of drugs for Westminster Pharmaceuticals, LLC and consulting expenses for Pinnacle Tek.
Includes wages and payroll, legal and accounting, marketing, rent and web development.
Since inception, we have funded our operations primarily through debt and equity capital raises and operational revenue.
From March to July 2014 we sold 375,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to investors in connection with the
private placement of our Series A Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share for total proceeds of $375,000. From September
2014 to December 2014 we sold 800,000 shares of the Company's common stock to investors in connection with a
private placement, together with warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock. The aggregate cash purchase
price of the common stock and warrants was $1,200,000.
We expect to continue to seek additional outside funding in the future although no assurance can be given that we will be
able to obtain financing on reasonable terms or revenues will continue. If we obtain additional financing by issuing equity
securities, our existing stockholders’ ownership will be diluted. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would
be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments. We may be unable to maintain operations at a
level sufficient for investors to obtain a return on their investments in our common stock. Further, we may continue to be
unprofitable.
We will need significantly more cash to implement our plan to operate a business-to-business web based marketplace
focused on the US pharmaceutical industry. Our core service is designed to bring the nation’s independent pharmacies
and accredited national suppliers of pharmaceuticals together to provide efficient and transparent buying and selling
opportunities.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2015 and 2014:
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Fiscal Year Ended
December 31,
2015
($)
December 31,
2014
($)
(1,202,137)
-
1,356,667
154,530
(1,064,575)
-
1,685,860
621,285
Cash used in operating activities for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 was $1,202,137. This is an increase of
$137,562 from same period in 2014 and was due to increased staffing as the Company transitioned to its operational
phase, continuing IT development of the Company’s web platform and professional fees.
There were no investing activities.
22
Financing activities in 2014 included proceeds from short term related party debt of $52,250 and repayments of
$105,639; Short-term debt and repayment of $10,000; proceeds of issuance of Preferred Stock of $535,000 and
proceeds of issuance of common stock of $1,204,250.
Financing activities in 2015 included proceeds from short term debt of $405,000; proceeds from exercise of warrants
of $1,667; and proceeds of issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock of $950,000.
Results of Operations
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared To Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2014
Fiscal Year
ending
December 30,
2015
($)
4,992,203
1,928,067
3,064,136
Fiscal Year ended
December 31,
2014
($)
1,496,227
440,047
1,056,180
3,696,067
355,116
4,051,183
(987,047)
-
130,136
(1,117,183)
2,113,033
374,619
2,487,652
(1,431,472)
576,417
4,154
(2,012,043)
Revenues
Cost of Sales
Gross Profit
Operating expenses:
General and Administrative
Warrants and Options Expense
Total Operating Expenses
Loss from operations
Loss on debt conversion
Interest Expense
Net loss
Substantially all of our revenues during the years ended December 31, 2015, and 2014 were from platform revenue and
pharmaceutical distribution. Revenues increased for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2015 to $4,992,203
compared to $1,496,227 for the comparable period in 2014. This increase was attributable to fee income from our
web-based platform and wholesale distribution. Our sales department has continued to add customers in 2015 through
direct marketing and customer training.
Cost of sales consists primarily of pharmaceutical wholesale distribution. Cost of sales increased for the Fiscal Year
ended December 31, 2015 to $1,928,067 compared to $440,047 comparable period in 2014. This increase was
primarily attributable to an increase in revenue from the wholesale distribution which has higher cost of sales than our
other revenue sources.
General and administrative expenses increased for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2015 to $3,696,067 compared
to $2,113,033 for the comparable period in 2014. A large component of general and administrative expenses in 2015
were professional service fees, comprised of legal, accounting, financial advisory, board compensation, SEC filing,
transfer agent and financing fees. The increase in general and administrative expenses was also affected by an increase in
employee cash compensation expense in the 2015 period due to increased staffing as we reached our operational phase
and our payroll expense was $1,869,254.
Warrant and options expense in the 2015 period represents compensation cost related to the issuance of employee
stock options.
Interest expense in 2015 was as a result of $1,400,000 in debt borrowings. In February 2014, the Xcellink loan of
$19,333 was converted to 600,000 shares of common stock along with $4,250 of proceeds. The shares were valued
at the market price on the respective date of the transaction and the fair value of the shares was determined to be
$600,000 and $576,417 was recorded as loss on conversion of debt during for the year ended December 31, 2014.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
In addition to our long term debt obligations to our various lenders, we have certain other contractual working capital
obligations, including contractual purchase obligations related to various supply contracts.
23
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2015:
Contractual Obligations
Total
Less than 1
year
1-3 years
3 - 5 years
More than 5
years
Payments due by Period
Short and Long-term debt obligations
$
1,400,000
450,000
950,000
Operating lease obligations
Purchase Obligations (1)
271,666
121,838
149,828
38,395
38,395
-
Total Contractual obligations
$ 1,710,061
610,233 1,099,828
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1)These include purchase commitments under outstanding supply agreements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no outstanding off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2015.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amount of net sales and expenses for each period. The following represents a summary of
our critical accounting policies, defined as those policies that we believe are the most important to the portrayal of our
financial condition and results of operations and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex
judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Revenue Recognition
In general the Company accounts for revenue recognition in accordance with ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition”.
Trxade, Inc. generates net fee income as a percentage of the total transactions between the buyer (independent
pharmacies) and the seller (wholesaler) of pharmaceutical drugs on the Trxade web-based platform. Revenue is
recognized when (1) the price is fixed and determined as the buyer orders the drugs from the wholesaler. (2) The
wholesaler has signed a contract with Trxade, Inc. which recognizes that an arrangement exists. (3) The wholesaler
delivers the drugs purchased to the buyer, products are delivered. (4) The collectability is reasonably assured by the
wholesaler through prior credit checks and payment experience.
Pinnacle Tek, Inc. generates gross revenues from IT Consulting and Job Placement. Revenue is recognized (1) with the
execution of a contract for the price and scope of services. (2) The contract also provides persuasive evidence of an
existing arrangement. (3) The IT Consulting services are performed and invoiced monthly and the job placement is
invoiced at the hiring of the applicant, delivery of services. (4) The collectability of the resulting receivable is determined
by credit checks prior to the performance of services and payment experience with the client.
Westminster Pharmaceutical LLC generates gross revenues from the sale of pharmaceutical drugs to independent
pharmacies or wholesalers. The revenue recognized when (1) the price is fixed and determinable at the time of the
transaction with an invoice. (2) The invoice is also persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists. (3) The products are
delivered to the buyer. (4) The collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured by credit check prior to the
transaction and experience with the customer.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with the provision of ASC 505, “Equity Based
Payments to Non-Employees” (“ASC 505”), Share Based Payments to Non-Employees, and ASC 505 which requires
that such equity instruments are recorded at their fair value on the measurement date. The measurement of stock-based
compensation is subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying instruments vest.
24
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock
Compensation”. ASC 718 requires companies to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an
award of equity instruments, including stock options, based on the grant date fair value of the award and to recognize it
as compensation expense over the period the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, usually
the vesting period.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Not applicable to a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of SEC Regulation S-K
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TRXADE GROUP, INC.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Statement of Operations for years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Notes to Financials for years ending December 31, 2015 and 2014
Page
F-1
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
25
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors
Trxade Group, Inc.
Odessa, Florida
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Trxade Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively
the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to
perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of Trxade Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the
related results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP
www.malone−bailey.com
Houston, Texas
March 28, 2016
F-1
Trxade Group, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2015 and 2014
Assets
2015
2014
Current Assets
Cash
Accounts Receivable, net
Inventory, net
Prepaid Assets
Other Assets
Total Current Assets
Property and Equipment (net)
Total Assets
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable
Accrued Liabilities
Other Liabilities
Notes Payable net of $15,000 and $ - discount
Short term Convertible Payable net of $35,697 and $ - discount
Deferred Income
Total Current Liabilities
Long Term Liabilities
Convertible Note net of $241,612 and $ - discount
Total Liabilities
Shareholders’ Equity
Series A Preferred Stock, $.00001 par value, 10,000,000 and 100,000,000
authorized; 0 and 0 issued and outstanding,
as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively
Common Stock, $0.00001 par value, 100,000,000 and 500,000,000
authorized; 31,435,827 and 31,269,160 issued and outstanding
as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 respectively
Additional Paid-in Capital
Retained Earnings (Deficit)
Total Shareholders’ Equity
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
860,132
498,100
284,718
201,361
183,359
2,027,670
-
2,027,670
356,159
296,803
-
235,000
164,303
-
1,052,265
708,388
1,760,653
$
705,602
349,025
46,429
57,676
59,584
1,218,316
3,802
1,222,118
291,059
175,786
64,264
-
-
22,568
553,677
-
553,677
-
-
314
5,915,674
(5,648,971)
267,017
2,027,670
$
312
5,199,917
(4,531,788)
668,441
1,222,118
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-2
Trxade Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Revenues
Cost of Sales
Gross Profit
Operating Expenses
General and Administrative
Operating Loss
Loss on Debt Conversion
Interest Expense
Net Loss
Basic loss per Common Share
Diluted loss per Common Share
Basic weighted average number of
Common Shares outstanding
Diluted weighted average number of
Common Shares outstanding
Years Ended
2015
2014
$
4,992,203
$
1,928,067
3,064,136
4,051,183
(987,047)
-
130,136
(1,117,183)
(0.04)
(0.04)
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,496,227
440,047
1,056,180
2,487,652
(1,431,472)
576,417
4,154
(2,012,043)
(0.07)
(0.07)
31,315,735
29,831,046
31,315,735
29,831,046
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Trxade Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity (Deficit)
Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Accumulated
Deficit
Total
Shareholder’s
Equity
(Deficit)
28,824,160 $
288 $
2,650,315 $
(2,519,745)
$
130,865
Balance at
December 31, 2013
Preferred Stock issued
for Cash
Preferred Stock
Conversion
Common Stock Issued
for Note
Common Stock Issued
for Cash
Options Expenses
Net Loss
December 31, 2014
Warrants converted to
common stock
Options Expenses
Beneficial conversion
features and relative
fair value of warrant
Net Loss
December 31, 2015
670,000 $
375,000
7
3
-
(1,045,000)
(10)
1,045,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
600,000
800,000
-
-
31,269,160 $
166,667
-
-
31,435,827 $
-
10
6
374,997
-
599,994
-
-
-
8
-
-
312 $
1,199,992
374,619
-
5,199,917 $
-
-
(2,012,043)
(4,531,788)
$
2
-
1,665
355,116
-
-
375,000
-
600,000
1,200,000
374,619
(2,012,043)
688,441
1,667
355,116
-
-
314 $
358,976
-
5,915,674 $
-
(1,117,183)
(5,648,971)
$
358,976
(1,117,183)
267,017
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Trxade Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Operating Activities:
Net Loss
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
Operating activities:
Depreciation
Bad debt expense
Inventory allowance
Loss from Debt Conversion
Options expense
Amortization of debt discount
Changes in Operating assets and Liabilities:
Accounts Receivable
Prepaid Assets
Other Current Assets
Inventory
Accounts Payable
Accrued Liabilities
Other Liabilities
Deferred Income
Net Cash used in operating activities
Financing Activities:
Repayments of Short Term Debt – Related Parties
Proceeds from Short Term Debt – Related Parties
Repayments of Short Term Debt
Proceeds from Short Term Debt Note Payable
Proceeds from Short Term Convertible Note
Proceeds from Long Term Convertible Note
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock
Proceeds from Issuance of Subscription Receivable
Proceeds from issuance of Preferred Stock
Proceeds from Warrants exercise
Net Cash provided by financing activities
Net increase or (Decrease) in Cash
Cash at Beginning of the Year
Cash at End of Year
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash Paid for Interest
Cash Paid for Income Taxes
Non –Cash Transactions
Beneficial conversion features and relative fair value of warrant
Shares Issued as Debt
Series A Convertible Preferred Shares converted to common stock
2015
2014
$
(1,117,183)
$
(2,012,043)
3,802
23,528
16,875
-
355,116
111,667
(172,603)
(143,685)
(123,775)
(255,164)
65,100
122,108
(65,355)
(22,568)
(1,202,137)
-
-
-
200,000
205,000
950,000
-
-
-
1,667
1,356,667
154,530
705,602
860,132
4,935
-
358,976
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,800
11,905
-
576,417
374,619
-
(255,067)
(55,964)
(59,584)
(3,056)
128,745
137,820
64,264
22,568
(1,064,576)
(105,639)
52,250
(10,000)
10,000
-
-
1,204,250
160,000
375,000
-
1,685,861
621,285
84,317
705,602
4,154
-
-
19,333
10
$
$
$
$
$
$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Trxade Group, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ending December 31, 2015 and 2014
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION
Trxade Group, Inc. (“Company”) owns 100% of Trxade, Inc., Westminster Pharmaceutical LLC and Pinnacle Tek,
Inc. The merger of Trxade, Inc. and Trxade Group, Inc. occurred in May 2013. Pinnacle Tek was merged with Trxade
Group, Inc. in July 2013. Westminster Pharmaceutical LLC was formed in January 2013.
Trxade, Inc. is a web based market platform that enables trade among healthcare buyers and sellers of pharmaceuticals,
accessories and services.
Westminster Pharmaceutical LLC, provides US state licensed pharmacies and other buying groups with FDA approved
pharmaceuticals as well as access to current benchmark pricing of pharmaceuticals.
Pinnacle Tek, Inc. is a technology consultant provider that supports the programming needs of parent company and also
provides other information technology consulting services.
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (“GAAP”), and include all the notes required by generally accepted accounting
principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for fair
presentation of the financial statements have been included.
The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company’s
financial statements. Such financial statements and accompanying notes are the representations of the Company’s
management, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) in all material respects, and have been
consistently applied in preparing the accompanying financial statements.
Use of Estimates – In preparing these financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions
that effect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of
the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Reclassification – Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Principle of Consolidation – The Company financial statements include the accounts of Trxade Group, Inc., Trxade,
Inc., Westminster Pharmaceutical LLC, and Pinnacle Tek, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash in bank accounts are at risk to the extent that they exceed U.S. Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation insured amounts. All investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less are cash
equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are available on demand and are generally in excess of FDIC insurance limits.
Accounts Receivable – The Company’s receivables are from customers and are collected within 90 days. The
Company determines the allowance based on known troubled accounts, historical experience, and other currently
available evidence. During the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, $23,528 and $11,905 of bad debt expense
was recognized, respectively.
Inventory - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost, is determined on a first-in, first-out basis. On a
quarterly basis, we analyze our inventory levels and reserve for inventory that is expected to expire prior to being sold,
inventory that has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value, inventory in excess of expected sales
requirements, or inventory that fails to meet commercial sale specifications. Expired inventory is disposed of and the
related costs are written off to the reserve for inventory obsolescence. During the year ended December 31, 2015,
$16,875 of inventory allowance was recognized for obsolescence items.
F-6
Beneficial Conversion Features – The intrinsic value of a beneficial conversion feature inherent to a convertible note
payable, which is not bifurcated and accounted for separately from the convertible note payable and may not be settled
in cash upon conversion, is treated as a discount to the convertible note payable. This discount is amortized over the
period from the date of issuance to the date the note is due using the effective interest method. If the note payable is
retired prior to the end of its contractual term, the unamortized discount is expensed in the period of retirement to
interest expense. In general, the beneficial conversion feature is measured by comparing the effective conversion price,
after considering the relative value of detachable instruments included in the financing transaction, if any, to the fair value
of the common shares at the commitment date to be received upon conversion.
Derivative financial instruments – The Company evaluates its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are
derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are
accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each
reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the statements of operations. For stock-based derivative
financial instruments, the Company uses a Black-Scholes option pricing model, assuming maximum value, in accordance
with ASC 815-15 “ Derivative and Hedging” to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent
valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as
liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the
balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could
be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments – The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities in accordance with the
requirements of FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”. ASC 820 clarifies the definition of fair
value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in
measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active
markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide
pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments such as exchange-traded
derivatives, marketable securities and listed equities.
Level 2 – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in level 1, which are either directly or
indirectly observable as of the reported date and includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or
other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions,
including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices
for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are
observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are
supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace. Instruments in this category
generally include non-exchange-traded derivatives such as commodity swaps, interest rate swaps, options and collars.
Level 3 – Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs
may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
Revenue Recognition –
In general the Company accounts for revenue recognition in accordance with ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition”.
Trxade, Inc. generates net fee income as a percentage of the total transactions between the buyer (independent
pharmacies) and the seller (wholesaler) of pharmaceutical drugs on the Trxade web-based platform. Revenue is
recognized when (1) the price is fixed and determined as the buyer orders the drugs from the wholesaler. (2) The
wholesaler has signed a contract with Trxade, Inc. which recognizes that an arrangement exists. (3) The wholesaler
delivers the drugs purchased to the buyer, products are delivered. (4) The collectability is reasonably assured by the
wholesaler through prior credit checks and payment experience.
Pinnacle Tek, Inc. generates gross revenues from IT Consulting and Job Placement. Revenue is recognized (1) with the
execution of a contract for the price and scope of services. (2) The contract also provides persuasive evidence of an
existing arrangement. (3) The IT Consulting services are performed and invoiced monthly and the job placement is
invoiced at the hiring of the applicant, delivery of services. (4) The collectability of the resulting receivable is determined
by credit checks prior to the performance of services and payment experience with the client.
Westminster Pharmaceutical LLC generates gross revenues from the sale of pharmaceutical drugs to independent
pharmacies or wholesalers. The revenue recognized when (1) the price is fixed and determinable at the time of the
transaction with an invoice. (2) The invoice is also persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists. (3) The products are
delivered to the buyer. (4) The collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured by credit check prior to the
transaction and experience with the customer.
F-7
Stock-Based Compensation – The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with the provision
of ASC 505, “Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees” (“ASC 505”), Share Based Payments to Non-Employees,
and ASC 505 which requires that such equity instruments are recorded at their fair value on the measurement date. The
measurement of stock-based compensation is subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying instruments vest.
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock
Compensation”. ASC 718 requires companies to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an
award of equity instruments, including stock options, based on the grant date fair value of the award and to recognize it
as compensation expense over the period the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, usually
the vesting period.
Income Taxes – The Company accounts for income taxes utilizing ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (SFAS No. 109). ASC
740 requires the measurement of deferred tax assets for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry
forwards, and of deferred tax liabilities for taxable temporary differences. Measurement of current and deferred tax
liabilities and assets is based on provisions of enacted tax law. The effects of future changes in tax rates are not included
in the measurement. The Company recognizes the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and
recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events and transactions that
have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. The Company currently has substantial net
operating loss carry forwards. The Company has recorded a 100% valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets
due to uncertainty of their ultimate realization. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred
tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Income (loss) Per Share – Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to commons
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per common share is
computed similar to basic net loss per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of
additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the
additional common shares were dilute. At December 31, 2015 and 2014 diluted net loss per share is equivalent to basic
net loss per share as the inclusion of any shares committed to be issued would be anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted Loss per Share:
Numerator:
Net Loss
Numerator for basic EPS – income (loss)
Available to common shareholders
Numerator for diluted EPS – income (loss)
Income available to common shareholders
Denominator:
Denominator for basic EPS –
Weighted average shares
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2014
$
(1,117,183)
$
(2,012,043)
(1,117,183)
(2,012,043)
(1,117,183)
(2,012,043)
31,315,735
29,831,046
Denominator for diluted EPS -
Weighted-average shares and assumed Conversions
Basic loss per common share
Diluted loss per common share
31,315,735
29,831,046
(0.04)
(0.04)
$
$
(0.07)
(0.07)
$
$
Concentration Of Credit Risks – Financial instruments that potentially subject the company to credit risk consist
principally of cash and cash equivalents and receivables. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with
financial institutions. Deposits are insured to Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. limits. At December 31, 2015 and 2014,
there was no uninsured cash. Other financial instruments include accounts payable and amounts due on notes payable,
the carrying value of these instruments represent their fair value.
F-8
Recent Accounting Pronouncements – The Company has implemented all new relevant accounting pronouncements that
are in effect through the date of these financial statements. The pronouncements did not have any material impact on the
financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new
accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its consolidated financial position
or results of operations.
NOTE 3 – SHORT-TERM DEBT AND RELATED PARTIES DEBT
Short Term Debt
During the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company assumed a loan from Xcellink International, Inc. totaled
$19,333. The loan carried an interest rate of 0%. In February 2014, the Xcellink loan of $19,333 was converted to
600,000 shares of common stock along with $4,250 of proceeds. The shares were valued at the market price on the
respective date of the transaction and the fair value of the shares was determined to be $600,000 and $576,417 was
recorded as loss on conversion of debt for the year ended December 31, 2014.
In August 2014, the Company entered into a loan with third parties for an amount of $10,000. The loan is due in
February 2015, with a variable interest rate. The loan was repaid in September 2014.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the short term debt had a balance of $0 and $0, respectively.
Convertible Promissory Note
Convertible promissory notes were issued in the aggregate amount of $200,000 in April and May 2015. The term of the
notes are one year. Simple interest of 10% is payable at the maturity date of the note. Prior to maturity the notes may be
converted for common stock at a conversion price of $1.50. The holders of the notes were granted warrants at one
common stock for $4.00 of the note amount, 50,000 warrants were issued at a strike price of $1.50 with an expiration
date of five years from date of issuance.
The Company evaluated the embedded conversion feature within the above convertible notes under ASC 815-15 and
ASC 815-40 and determined embedded conversion feature does not meet the definition of a liability. Then the
Company evaluated the conversion feature for a beneficial conversion feature at inception. The Company accounted for
the intrinsic value of a Beneficial Conversion Feature inherent to the convertible note payable and a total debt discount
of $53,546 was recorded.
The Company also uses the Black-Scholes pricing model to estimate the fair value of the warrants issued along with
convertible notes on the date of grant. See assumptions employed in the calculation in Note 6. The Company accounted
for relative fair value of the warrants issued and a total debt discount of $53,546 was recorded.
During 2015, debt discount of $71,396 was amortized. As of December 31, 2015, convertible note has a balance of
$164,303, net of $35,697 unamortized debt discount.
Promissory Note
In May 2015, a promissory note was issued in the face amount of $250,000. The term of the note is one year. The note
has an original issuance discount of $45,000, thus the cash proceeds from the promissory note is $205,000.
During 2015, debt discount of $30,000 was amortized. As of December 31, 2015, promissory note has a balance of
$235,000, net of $15,000 unamortized debt discount.
Related Party Debt
In August 2013 the company entered into a loan of $17,000 with Annapurna Gundlapalli, a related party. The loan
matured at December 31, 2013 and carried 0% interest rate. The loan was repaid in February 2014.
In July 2013 the company entered into a loan of $21,389 with a shareholder. The loan matures at January 31, 2014 and
carried 0% interest rate. The loan was repaid in February 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2014, $12,250
was advanced from the same shareholders. The loan is due on demand and carried 0% interest rate. The loan was
repaid during September, 2014.
In July 2013 the company entered into a loan of $15,000 with Sansur Associates, a related party. The loan matures at
June 30, 2014 and carried 0% interest rate. The loan was repaid in September 2014. During the year ended December
31, 2014, $40,000 was advanced from Sansur Associates. The loan is due on demand and carried 0% interest rate.
The loan was repaid during fiscal year 2014.
F-9
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the short term debt - related parties had a balance of $0 and $0, respectively.
NOTE 4 – LONG TERM DEBT
Convertible Promissory Note
Convertible promissory notes were issued in the aggregate amount of $950,000 in November and December 2015.
The term of the notes are three years. Interest rate is a “Royalty Payment” which consists of a percentage of net Profit
of certain transactions, payable within 45 days of the end of each quarter. Prior to maturity the notes may be converted
for common stock at a conversion price of $2.50. The holders of the notes were granted warrants at one common
stock for $3.00 of the note amount, 316,667 warrants were issued at a strike price of $0.01 with an expiration date of
five years from date of issuance. An additional 10,000 warrants were issued under the same terms.
The Company evaluated the embedded conversion feature within the above convertible notes under ASC 815-15 and
ASC 815 40 and determined embedded conversion feature does not meet the definition of a liability. Then the
Company evaluated the conversion feature for a beneficial conversion feature at inception. The Company accounted for
the intrinsic value of a Beneficial Conversion Feature inherent to the convertible note payable and a total debt discount
of $0 was recorded.
The Company also uses the Black-Scholes pricing model to estimate the fair value of the warrants issued along with
convertible notes on the date of grant. See assumptions employed in the calculation in Note 6. The Company accounted
for relative fair value of the warrants issued and a total debt discount of $251,883 was recorded.
During 2015 debt discount of $10,271 was amortized. As of December 2015, convertible note has a balance of
$708,388, net of $241,612 unamortized debt discount.
NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
2014
In March, April and July 2014, 375,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Shares were issued at $1.00 per
share. The shares were entitled to an annual dividend of $0.05 per share when, as and if declared by the Board of
Directors; dividends are not cumulative. There were no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the Series
“A” Preferred Stock. The holders had the right to convert their shares at any time into shares of common stock on a
one-for-one basis. In addition, the shares automatically convert into shares of common stock once the Company
becomes an SEC reporting Company.
In September 2014, all of the Company’s 1,045,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Shares automatically
converted into 1,045,000 shares of common stock as the Company became an SEC reporting Company.
The Company analyzed the embedded conversion option for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15
“Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the conversion option should be classified as equity. The Company also
analyzed the conversion option for beneficial conversion features consideration under ASC 470-20 “Convertible
Securities with “Beneficial Conversion Features” and noted none.
In 2014, Trxade Group, Inc., accepted subscription agreements with certain investors. Under the terms of the
Subscription Agreements, the Company accepted subscriptions for 800,000 shares of the Company's common stock,
$0.00001 par value per share, to the investors in connection with a private placement. The common stock issuable
above also included warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock under the terms and conditions of a
warrant agreement. The warrants have a five year term and an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The aggregate cash
purchase price of the common stock and warrants was $1,200,000.
2015
In November 166,667 warrants were exercised for common stock at $0.01 per share for total proceed of $1,667.
F-10
NOTE 6 - WARRANTS
From September through December 2014, 200,000 warrants were issued along with common stock (see Note 5).
From April to May 2015, 50,000 warrants were issued along with convertible debt. In November and December
326,667 warrants were issued along with convertible debt. See Note 3.
The following table summarizes the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of warrants granted during the years
ended December 31, 2015:
Expected dividend yield
Weighted-average expected volatility
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate
Expected life of warrants
2015
0%
200%
0.48%
5 years
The Company’s outstanding and exercisable warrants as of December 31, 2014 and 2015 are presented below:
Warrants Outstanding as of December 31, 2013
Warrants Granted
Warrants Forfeited
Warrants Outstanding as of December 31, 2014
Warrants Granted
Warrants Forfeited
Warrants Exercised
Warrants Outstanding as of December 31, 2015
NOTE 7 - OPTIONS
Number
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Contractual
Life in Years
Intrinsic
Value
435,000
200,000
-
635,000
375,667
-
(166,667)
845,000
$1.00
$0.01
-
$0.69
$0.21
-
$0.01
$0.61
4.86
$
5.00
-
-
-
-
4.15
$
515,500
5.00
-
-
-
-
-
3.77
$
435,900
The company maintains a stock option plan under which certain employees and management are awarded option grants
based on a combination of performance and tenure. All options may be exercised for a period up to four ½ years
following the grant date, after which they expire. Options are vested up to 5 years from the grant date. The Board has
authorized the use of 2,000,000 shares for option grants.
Stock Options were granted during 2015 and 2014 to employees totaling, 740,000 and 450,000 respectfully. These
options vest in up to 5 years and are granted with an exercise price of between $.75 - $1.60 and the expiration date up
to five years after the last vesting period. The last ones expire December 2025.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock-based awards on the date
of grant. The assumptions employed in the calculation of the fair value of share-based compensation expense were
calculated as follows for all years presented:
Under the Black-Scholes option price model, fair value of the option granted is estimated at $840,448 at December 31,
2014.
Under the Black-Scholes option price model, fair value of the option granted is estimated at $1,013,620 at December
31, 2015.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, 420,000 options were forfeited due to employee resignation. The options
were not vested and the option expense reversed was $92,176. During the year ended December 31, 2015, another
20,000 options expired.
F-11
The following table summarizes the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options granted during the Years
Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:
Expected dividend yield
Weighted-average expected volatility
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate
Expected life of options
2015 and 2014
0%
200%
0.48% - 1.75%
5 years
Total compensation cost related to stock options was $355,116 and $374,619 for the years ended December 31,
2015 and 2014. As of December 31, 2015, there was $440,753 of unrecognized compensation costs related to stock
options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 6.20 years. The following table
represents stock option activity as of and for the two years ended December 31, 2015:
Number of
Options
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Contractual
Life in Years
Intrinsic
Value
450,000
-
-
450,000
-
900,000
112,500
(420,000)
740,000
(20,000)
1,200,000
332,000
1.00
-
-
-
1.00
1.00
1.37
1.32
1.00
1.07
1.04
4.16
-
-
3.41
3.16
6.68
9.34
2.08
5.19
3.34
$
$
-
56,250
-
-
-
-
28,000
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
Exercisable at December 31, 2013
Forfeited
Granted
Exercised
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
Exercisable at December 31, 2014
Forfeited
Granted
Expired
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
Exercisable at December 31, 2015
NOTE 8 – INCOME TAXES
At December 31, 2015 and 2014 deferred tax assets consist of the following:
Federal loss carry forwards
Less: valuation allowance
December 31, 2015
990,169
(990,169)
-
$
$
$
$
December 31, 2014
743,828
(743,828)
-
The Company has established a valuation allowance equal to the full amount of the deferred tax asset primarily due to
uncertainty in the utilization of the net operating loss carry forwards.
The estimated net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $2,829,054 begin to expire in 2033 for both federal
and state purposes.
NOTE 9 – RELATED PARTIES
Trxade Group, Inc. owed management wages to Mr. Prashant Patel and Mr. Suren Ajjarapu at December 31, 2015
and 2014 of $137,472 and $104,655, respectively.
Rental payments were made to Sansur Associates in December 31, 2015 and 2014 of $1,000 and $14,970,
respectively.
F-12
NOTE 10 – Commitments and Contingencies
The Company leases its premises in Odessa, Florida under an operating lease that expires in 2018. Future minimum
rental payments under these non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2015 are:
2016
2017
2018
Total
$
$
$
$
121,838
128,424
21,404
271,666
In November 2015, Family Medicine Pharmacy, LLC filed a class-action claim against Trxade Group, Inc. and its
wholly owned subsidiary Westminster Pharmaceutical, LLC, Inc. Family Medicine has served Trxade for allegedly
utilizing a “junk fax” advertising program. Family Medicine seeks statutory damages on behalf of a class of similarly
situated entities throughout the United States. The litigation is in its preliminary stages, and discovery has not yet
commenced. Although management denies any material liability and the propriety of class certification in this lawsuit, the
litigation could have a lengthy duration, it is more likely than not that damages and/or settlement costs will be incurred
but cannot be determined at this time. Therefore under ASC 450 “loss contingencies”, no accrual is recorded as of
December 31, 2015.
NOTE 11 – SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company classifies its business interests into reportable segments which are Trxade and Westminster.
Year Ended December 31, 2015
Revenue
Segment Assets
Segment Profit/Loss
Year Ended December 31, 2014
Revenue
Segment Assets
Segment Profit/Loss
Trxade
Westminster
2,745,589
434,413
292,438
Trxade
974,049
327,028
(1,571,108)
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,079,678
1,503,522
(1,341,046)
Westminster
191,241
137,326
(331,961)
$
$
$
$
$
$
Corporate Overhead was allocated based on revenue, the amount was $ (1,138,558) and $(1,544,545) in years ending
2015 and 2014, respectfully.
F-13
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed
or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and
communicated to the Company’s management, as appropriate, in order to allow timely decisions in connection with
required disclosure.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls
and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period
covered by this Annual Report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that as of December 31, 2015, that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.
As a result of the formative stage of our development, the Company has not fully implemented the necessary internal
controls. The matters involving internal controls and procedures that the Company's management considered to be
material weaknesses under the standards of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) were: (1) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the
requirements and application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and
SEC disclosure requirements; and (2) ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processes.
Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth above did not have an effect on the Company's financial
results reported herein. We are committed to improving our financial organization. As part of this commitment, we have
recently increased our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise as we develop the internal and financial
resources of the Company. In addition, the Company will prepare and implement sufficient written policies and
checklists which will set forth procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and
application of GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements.
Management believes that preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists will remedy the following
material weaknesses (i) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to
the requirements and application of GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements; and (ii) ineffective controls over period
end financial close and reporting processes.
We have improved our financial organization as we have increased our personnel resources and technical accounting
expertise. We will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures and our
internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over
financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP, but because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. The Company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that are designed to:
·
·
·
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the Company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
26
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2015. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, management
believes that the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2015.
Specifically, management’s evaluation was based on the following material weakness which existed of December 31,
2015:
·
·
Financial Reporting Systems: The Company did not maintain a fully integrated financial consolidation and
reporting system throughout the period and as a result, extensive manual analysis, reconciliation and adjustments
were required in order to produce financial statements for external reporting purposes.
Segregation of Duties: The Company does not currently have a sufficient complement of technical accounting
and external reporting personal commensurate to support standalone external financial reporting under public
company or SEC requirements. Specifically, the Company did not effectively segregate certain accounting
duties due to the small size of its accounting staff, and maintain a sufficient number of adequately trained
personnel necessary to anticipate and identify risks critical to financial reporting and the closing process. In
addition, there were inadequate reviews and approvals by the Company's personnel of certain reconciliations
and other processes in day-to-day operations due to the lack of a full complement of accounting staff.
During the year December 31, 2015, we reevaluated our most recent assessment of internal controls and concluded that
that our internal controls were still not effective. The Company has recently engaged additional accounting support to
provide more resources and expand the technical accounting knowledge.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As an early stage company, we continue to develop our internal control systems. We continue to seek additional
financial reporting and accounting experience and expertise. Except as otherwise discussed above, there were no
changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2015 that have materially
affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
This report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding our internal controls
over financial reporting. Under SEC rules, such attestation is not required for smaller reporting companies such as
ourselves.
Inherent Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Management of the Company, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures or its internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all
error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact
that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Furthermore,
because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been
detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of
some persons or by the collusion of two or more persons. The design of any system of controls is based in part on
certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of
controls to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
Item 9B. Other Information
Amendment of Executive Employment Agreement.
On March 22, 2016, after approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, the Company
amended Mr. Ajjarapu’s executive employment agreement and increased Mr. Ajjarapu’s annual salary as CEO of the
Company from $100,000 to $165,000 per year. No other changes we made and this amendment is included as Exhibit
10.14 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
27
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Set forth below is certain information regarding our directors and executive officers as of March 28, 2016:
Name
Suren Ajjarapu
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
Position
Age
44
Director/Officer Since
January 2014
Prashant Patel
Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
Donald G. Fell
Director
Howard Doss
Chief Financial Officer
41
67
61
January 2014
January 2014
January 2014
Fernando Sanchez Director
62
March 2015
Business Experience
The following is a brief description of the education and business experience of our current directors and executive
officers.
Suren Ajjarapu, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary.
Mr Ajjarapu has served as our Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary since our acquisition of
Trxade Nevada on January 8, 2014, and as the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary of
Trxade Nevada since its inception. Mr. Ajjarapu was a Founder, CEO and Chairman of Sansur Renewable Energy,
Inc., a company involved in developing wind power sites in the Midwest, United States, from 2009 to 2012. Mr.
Ajjarapu was a Founder, President and Director of Aemetis, Inc., a biofuels company (AMTX.OB) and a Founder,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of International Biofuels, a subsidiary of Aemetis, Inc., from 2006 to 2009. Mr.
Ajjarapu was Co-Founder, COO, and Director Global Information Technology, Inc., an IT outsourcing and systems
design company, headquartered in Tampa, Florida with major operations in India from 1995 to 2006. Mr. Ajjarapu
acts as a non-Executive Director for AIM-listed company Nandan Clean Tec Plc. (Ticker: NAND), a backward
integrated Biofuels company. Mr. Ajjarapu holds an MS in Environmental engineering from South Dakota State
University, Brookings, South Dakota, and an MBA from the University of South Florida, specializing in International
Finance and Management. Mr. Ajjarapu is also a graduate of the Venture Capital and Private Equity program at
Harvard University. Our Board of Directors believes that Mr. Ajjarapu’s history with our company, from both an
operational standpoint and that of a member of management, are vital to the Board’s collective knowledge of our day-
to-day operations.
Prashant Patel, Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
Mr. Patel has served as our full-time President and COO, and as a director since our acquisition of Trxade Nevada on
January 8, 2014, and as the COO and President and as a director of Trxade Nevada since its inception. . Mr. Patel is a
registered pharmacist and pharmaceutical consultant with over ten years of experience in retail pharmacy and
pharmaceutical logistics and the founder of several pharmacies in the Tampa Bay area, in Florida. Mr. Patel has been a
President and Member of the Board of Trxade since August 2010. Since October 2008, Mr. Patel has been Managing
Member of the APAA LLC, a pharmacy. Since April 2007, Mr. Patel has been a Vice President of Holiday Pharmacy,
Inc., a pharmacy. Mr Patel graduated from Nottingham University School of Pharmacy and practiced in the UK before
obtaining his masters in Transport, Trade and Finance from Cass Business School, City University, UK. Our Board of
Directors believes that Mr. Patel’s history with our company, from both an operational standpoint and that of a member
of management, are vital to the Board’s collective knowledge of our day-to-day operations.
Howard A. Doss, Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Doss has served as our CFO since January 2014. Mr. Doss has served in a variety of capacities with accounting
and investment firms. He joined the staff of Seidman & Seidman (BDO Seidman, Dallas) in 1977, and in 1980 he
joined the investment firm Van Kampen Investments, opening the firm’s southeast office in Tampa in 1982. He remained
with the firm until 1996 when he joined Franklin Templeton to develop corporate retirement plan distribution. After
working for the Principal Financial Group office in Tampa, Mr. Doss was City Executive for U.S. Trust in Sarasota,
responsible for high net worth individuals. He retired from that position in 2009. He served as CFO and Director for
Sansur Renewable Energy an alternative energy development company, from 2010 to 2012. Mr. Doss has also served
as President of STARadio Corp. since 2005. Mr. Doss is a member of the America Institute of CPA’s. He is a
graduate of Illinois Wesleyan University. Our Board of Director’s believes that Mr. Doss’ experience is significant to the
Board’s understanding today’s complex and ever changing accounting rules and regulations.
28
Donald G. Fell, Director
Mr. Fell has served as a Director of our company since January 2014, as well as a director of Trxade Nevada since
December 2013. Since 1992, Mr. Fell has been a Director/Professor Foundation for Teaching Economics. From 1995
to 2012, Mr. Fell was Senior Fellow/Professor at the Executive MBA faculty at the University of South Florida. He
was also a Visiting Professor at the University of Rochelle, FR in 2010. Mr. Fell holds degrees in Economics from
Indiana State University, with additional graduate work in Economics at Northern Illinois University and Illinois State
University. Mr. Fell since 2012 has been employed as Institute Director and Professor for the Davis, CA based
Foundation for Teaching Economics, conducting Institutes related to 1) economic policy; and 2) environmental
economics. Institute audiences consist of university/college professors, high school teachers and government leaders.
These Institutes have been held throughout the U.S. Our Board of Director’s believes that Mr. Fell’s extensive
experience in the field of economics and business will provide us with valuable insight as we seek to execute our
business strategy.
Fernando V. Sanchez, Director
Mr. Sanchez has served as a Director of our company since March 17, 2015. Mr. Sanchez was Senior Vice President
and CFO of HealthLand, a private healthcare information technology enterprise, from 2011 to 2012. Prior to that Mr.
Sanchez was CEO and member of the Board of Directors of BodyMedia, a private medical device & consumer device
company and leader in solutions for metabolic disorders from 2006-2009. Further, Mr. Sanchez was a member of the
Board of Advisors of the Florida Council on Economic Education, a not for profit organization dedicated to promoting
economic education, from 1987 to 1996 and Director of the Miami Rescue Mission, a homeless shelter since 1991. He
has been an active member of the NACD, National Association of Corporate Directors, currently working on the
NACD Governance Fellow credentials, since February of 2011. Mr. Sanchez holds a B.Sc., Mechanical and Ocean
Engineering, University of Miami, and an MBA, Corporate Policy and Finance, from the University of Michigan. Our
Board of Director’s believes that Mr. Sanchez is an accomplished business executive, who has been successful in
multiple enterprises-from private start-ups to public major corporations (Medtronic, Cordis, Vodafone). He was one of
the lead executives in the initial IPO of Vodafone, a $900 million corporate spin-off, and helped lead its successful
ramp-up and sales growth to become the cellphone service leader in Europe. He was also involved in various leadership
positions in the electronics & medical device industry, such as: coronary & peripheral cardiovascular diseases, sports
medicine, ear/nose/throat, spinal
therapies, metabolic disorders such as obesity and diabetes, data
communications/telephony, & wireless/wearable telemetry processors.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among any of our executive officers or directors.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our board of directors has the authority to appoint committees to perform certain management and administration
functions. Our board of directors has two committees: the audit committee and the compensation committee.
Audit Committee
The primary purpose of the audit committee will be to assist the board of directors’ oversight of:
·
·
·
·
·
·
the integrity of our financial statements; our systems of control over financial reporting and disclosure controls
and procedures;
our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
our independent auditors’ qualifications and independence;
the performance of our independent auditors and our internal audit function; and
all related-person transactions for potential conflict of interest situations on an ongoing basis; and
the preparation of the report required to be prepared by the committee pursuant to SEC rules.
Mr. Fell and Mr. Sanchez serve on the audit committee, where Mr. Sanchez acted as chairman of the audit committee.
Mr. Fell and Mr. Sanchez each qualify as an ‘‘audit committee financial expert’’ as such term has been defined by the
SEC in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. Our board of directors has affirmatively determined that Mr. Fell and Mr.
Sanchez meet the definition of ‘‘independent directors’’ for the purposes of serving on the audit committee under
applicable SEC rules, and we intend to comply with these independence requirements within the time periods specified.
29
Compensation Committee
The primary purpose of our compensation committee is to: recommend to our board of directors for consideration, the
compensation and benefits of our executive officers and key employees; monitor and review our compensation and
benefit plans; administer our stock and other incentive compensation plans and programs and prepare recommendations
and periodic reports to the board of directors concerning such matters; prepare the compensation committee report
required by SEC rules to be included in our annual report; prepare recommendations and periodic reports to the board
of directors as appropriate; and handle such other matters that are specifically delegated to the compensation committee
by our board of directors from time to time.
Mr. Fell and Mr. Sanchez serve on the compensation committee, and Mr. Fell serves as the chairman.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of our executive officers serve on the compensation committee or board of directors of any other company of
which any of the members of our compensation committee or any of our directors is an executive officer.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our Board of Directors had adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers
and employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will be available for review in print, without charge, to any
stockholder who requests a copy by writing to us at Trxade Group, Inc., 1115 Gunn Hwy, Odessa, Florida, 33556,
Attention: Investor Relations. Each of our directors, employees and officers are required to comply with the Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics
.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers, and
persons who own more than 10% of the outstanding shares of our common stock (collectively, “Reporting Persons”) to
file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Reporting Persons are required by SEC regulations to
furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file.
Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received or written representations from the Reporting Persons,
we believe that, with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, all of the Reporting Persons complied with all
applicable Section 16 filing requirements on a timely basis.
30
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth the compensation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 for services
rendered to us (including our subsidiary, Trxade, Inc.) by our Chief Executive Officer and our two most highly
compensated executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer:
Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal
Position
Suren Ajjarapu
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer,
and Director
Prashant Patel
Chief Operating Officer,
President and Director
Howard A. Doss
Chief Financial Officer
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($)
Option
Awards
($)
2014 $100,000 (1)
2015 $100,000 (1)
2014 $125,000 (2)
2015 $125,000 (2)
2014 $28,352 (3)
$52,500(3)
2015
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$277,656 (4)
-
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$100,000
$100,000
$125,000
$125,000
$306,008
$52,500
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
The amount shown reflects compensation under an at will employment agreement with the Company.
The amount shown reflects compensation under an at will employment agreement with the Company.
The amount shown reflects compensation under a consulting agreement with the Company.
This represents a stock option to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock granted in January 2014, and
valued per FASB ASC 718. The stock option will vest and become exercisable in four equal installments of
75,000 shares on January 20 of each year commencing on January 20, 2015.
Employment and Consulting Agreements
All of our named executives are at-will employees or consultants. The Company has entered in an at-will employment
agreement with Mr. Ajjarapu, with annual salary of $100,000 and a possible $50,000 performance bonus; and Mr.
Ajjarapu’s annual salary was increased on April 22, 2016 to $165,000, with the possible performance bonus remaining
the same at $50,000. This amendment is included as Exhibit 10.14 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The
Company entered in an at-will employment agreement with Mr. Patel, with annual salary of $125,000 and a possible
$50,000 performance bonus. The Company has an hourly rate consulting arrangement with Mr. Doss. The Company
has also entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors. The annual bonus payable to each of Mr.
Ajjarapu and Mr. Patel is based upon executive’s performance and the Company’s attainment of objectives established
by the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of the Board. With respect to any subjective milestones, the
determination of whether executive has attained the mutually agreed upon milestones for the bonus shall be reasonably
determined by the Board or the Compensation Committee.
31
Compensation of the Board of Directors
The following table provides information regarding all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to each person who
served as a director of Trxade Group, Inc. for some portion or all of 2015 and 2014. Other than as set forth in the table
and described more fully below, Trxade Group, Inc. did not pay any fees, made any equity or non-equity awards, or
paid any other compensation, to its non-employee directors. All compensation paid to its employee directors is set forth
in the tables summarizing executive officer compensation above.
Fees Earned or
paid in Cash
Stock
Awards Option Awards
All Other
Compensation
Total
Name
2014
Donald Fell
Charles Pope
Donald Almeida
2015
Donald Fell
Fernando Sanchez
$
$
$
$
$
1,000
1,000
500
3,750
3,750
-
-
-
-
-
$
-
94,528 (2)
- (3)
-
$
75,000 (1)
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
1,000
95,528
500
3,750
78,750
(1)
(2)
(3)
In March 2015, the Company granted Mr. Sanchez options to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock,
vesting over four years and exercisable at $1.61 per share.
In April 2014 Mr. Pope was granted options to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock, vesting over four
years and exercisable at $1.00 per share. Mr. Pope resigned in February 2015 with no options vesting.
In January 2015 Mr. Almeida was granted options to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock, vesting over
four years and exercisable at $1.60 per share. Mr. Almeida resigned in February 2015 with no options vesting.
Non-employee directors are paid $5,000 for board responsibilities. The Company has also entered into an
indemnification agreement with Messrs. Fell and Sanchez.
Outstanding Option Equity Awards at 2015 Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2015 concerning unexercised options, unvested stock and
equity incentive plan awards for each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
--
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
--
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
300,000(1)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
1.00
Option
Expiration
Date
1/1/2024
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)
---
Market
Value
of
Shares
or Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
---
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not
Vested
($)
---
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
---
Name
Howard A. Doss,
Chief Financial
Officer
Grant Date
1/20/2014
(1)
Vesting is 25% of the total number of shares on the one year anniversary of the vesting commencement date of
1/20/2014 and 25% shall vest on each one year anniversary.
32
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our securities as of March
28, 2016 by (i) each of our named executive officers and directors; (ii) each person known to us who owns beneficially
more than 5% of any class of our outstanding equity securities; and (iii) all of our executive officers and directors as a
group. The number of shares and the percentage of shares beneficially owned by each such person or group, as set
forth below, include shares of common stock that such person or group had the right to acquire on or within sixty days
after March 18, 2016 pursuant to the exercise of vested and exercisable options or warrants. References to options or
warrants in the footnotes to the table below include only options or warrants to purchase shares that were exercisable
on or within sixty days after March 23, 2016.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
Suren Ajjarapu, Chairman, CEO (4)
Prashant Patel, Director, COO, and President (5)
Donald G Fell, Director (6)
Howard Doss, CFO (7)
Fernando V. Sanchez, Director
All executive officers and directors as a Group (five persons)
Greater than 5% Stockholders
* Less than one 1%
Number of Shares
Beneficially
Owned (2)
Percentage
Beneficially
Owned (3)
14,150,000
12,250,000
50,000
150,000
-
26,600,000
45.0%
38.9%
*
*
-
84.6%
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the following table, the address of each person named in the table
is: c/o Trxade Group, Inc., 1115 Gunn Hwy, Odessa, Florida, 33556.
Based on 31,435,827 shares of Common Stock outstanding on December 31, 2015. Does not include shares
issuable upon exercise of (i) 1,190,000 stock options currently outstanding, (ii) warrants to purchase 845,000
shares of Common Stock, (iii) 810,000 shares which are reserved for the Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive
Plan, none of which shares are issuable within 60 days of the date set forth above, or (iv) stock issuable upon
the conversion of outstanding promissory notes, including up to 133,333 shares of Common Stock which may
issuable upon the conversion of $200,000 of promissory notes due April 2016, and 380,000 shares of
Common Stock which may be issuable upon the conversion of $950,000 of promissory notes due in October
2018.
Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owner of the common stock listed above, based on
information furnished by such owners, have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares,
subject to community property laws where applicable. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with
the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities.
Includes (i) 7,550,000 shares owned directly by Mr. Ajjarapu, (ii) 4,050,000 shares owned by Sandhya
Ajjarapu, Mr. Ajjarapu’s wife, for whom Mr. Ajjarapu claims beneficial ownership, (iii) 1,275,000 shares
owned by the Surendra Ajjarapu Revocable Trust of 2007, for whom Mr. Ajjarapu claims beneficial ownership
as Trustee, and (iv) 1,275,000 shares owned by the Sandhya Ajjarapu Revocable Trust of 2007, for whom
Mr. Ajjarapu claims beneficial ownership as Trustee.
Includes (i) 7,350,000 shares owned directly by Mr. Patel, (ii) 2,500,000 shares owned by Rina Patel, Mr.
Patel’s wife for whom Mr. Patel claims beneficial ownership, and (iii) 2,400,000 shares owned by the Patel
Trust, for whom Mr. Patel claims beneficial ownership as Trustee.
Includes 50,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options that are exercisable within
60 days of the applicable date above.
Includes 150,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options that are exercisable
within 60 days of the applicable date above.
There are no current arrangements among any of the foregoing persons which would result in a change in control.
33
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2015 with respect to securities that may be issued under
our equity compensation plans.
Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
(a)
2,035,000
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
(b)
$.87
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
(c)
810,000
-
2,035,000
-
$.87
-
810,000
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
Total
The equity compensation plans approved by the Company's security holders are the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (“2014
Stock Plan”) of Trxade Group, Inc., Delaware corporation, and the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan of Trxade Group, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation and predecessor in interest to Trxade Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The above listed
equity compensation plans were adopted as of December 31, 2015, with the approval of security holders.
Summary of Material Features of the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan
The following discussion summarizes the material terms of the 2014 Stock Plan. A description of the 2014 Stock Plan,
which is intended merely as a summary of its principal features and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text
of the 2014 Stock Plan, as filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration Statement on Form
10 of Trxade Group, Inc., File No. 000-55218, filed on June 6, 2014, is below.
Administration. The 2014 Stock Plan is administered by the Company’s Board of Directors and the Compensation
Committee of the Board.
Term. The 2014 Stock Plan shall continue in effect for a period of 10 years. In general, the term of each option granted
shall be no more than ten 10 years from the date of grant, though in certain instances such term may be shorter.
Eligibility. Employees and service providers of the Company and its subsidiaries and non-employee directors of the
Company are eligible to receive awards under the 2014 Stock Plan. Awards under the 2014 Stock Plan may include
grants of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units and performance
shares, and awards intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code. Eligibility for any particular award is determined by the Administrator (as defined in the 2014 Stock
Plan) and, in the case of certain awards such as incentive stock options, eligibility for receipt of such awards may be
limited by the Internal Revenue Code.
Plan Limit. The Company has reserved 2,000,000 Common Shares for issuance under the 2014 Stock Plan. The
2014 Stock Plan had 810,000 remaining shares reserved for issuance as of March 28, 2016.
The above limit is subject to adjustment for certain changes in the Company’s capitalization such as stock dividends,
stock splits, combinations or similar events. If an award expires, terminates, is forfeited or is settled in cash rather than in
Common Shares, the Common Shares not issued under that award will again become available for grant under the 2014
Stock Plan. If Common Shares are surrendered to the Company or withheld to pay any exercise price or tax
withholding requirements, only the number of Common Shares issued net of the shares withheld or surrendered will be
counted against the number of Common Shares available under the 2014 Stock Plan. The exercise price for a stock
option or stock appreciation right may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant
or may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant for employees representing
more than 10% of the voting power of all of the classes of stock of the Company. The Board may amend, alter,
suspend or terminate the plan. The Company must obtain stockholder approval of any amendment of the 2014 Stock
Plan to the extent necessary and desirable to comply with applicable law.
34
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Transactions with Related Persons
All of our executives are at-will employees or consultants. Each of Messrs. Ajjarapu and Patel are parties to an at-will
executive employment agreement. Mr. Ajjarapu’s executive employment agreement was amended on April 22, 2016
to include an annual salary increase, and this amendment is included as Exhibit 10.14 to this Annual Report on Form 10-
K. The Company has also entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors.
The Company’s founders Mr. Ajjarapu (through Sansur Associates, a company that he controls) and Mr. Patel have
periodically loaned funds on a short-term interest free basis to cover the Company’s operating expenses. In March and
June 2014, Mr. Patel loaned the Company an additional $11,000 and $1,250, respectively. The largest amount owed
on these loans in 2014 was $21,289. As of June 30, 2014, $12,250 was outstanding on these loans. No interest was
paid on any of these loans.
In January 2014 Mr. Ajjarapu (through Sansur Associates) was repaid $1,500 and was repaid $3,000 in June 2014 for
loans he previously made. In March 2014 he loaned the company an additional $40,000. The largest amount owed on
these loans in 2014 was $53,500. As of June 30, 2014, $50,500 was outstanding on these loans. No interest was paid
on any of these loans.
During the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2015, there have been no other transactions, or currently proposed
transactions, in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or
one percent of the average of our total assets at year-end for the last completed fiscal years and in which any related
person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Director Independence
Our common stock is traded on the OTCQB under the symbol “TRXD”. The OTCQB electronic trading platform does
not maintain any standards regarding the “independence” of the directors on our company’s Board of Directors, and we
are not otherwise subject to the requirements of any national securities exchange or an inter-dealer quotation system
with respect to the need to have a majority of our directors be independent.
In the absence of such requirements, we have elected to use the definition for “director independence” under the
NASDAQ stock market’s listing standards, which defines an “independent director” as “a person other than an officer
or employee of the Company or the Company’s subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship, which in the
opinion of our Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the
responsibilities of a director.” The definition further provides that, among others, employment of a director by us (or any
parent or subsidiary of ours) at any time during the past three years is considered a bar to independence regardless of
the determination of our Board of Directors. Two of our four directors, Mr. Fell and Mr. Sanchez, are deemed
“independent” under the NASDAQ Stock Market’s listing standards.
35
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Aggregate fees billed to us by MaloneBailey, LLP with respect to our 2015 and 2014 fiscal years were as follows:
Audit Fees
All Other Fees
Total
$
2015
35,000 $
15,000
2014
25,000
7,500
$ 50,000 $ 32,500
Aggregate fees billed to us by Thomas Craig & Co. with respect to our 2015 and 2014 years were as follows:
Tax Fees
All Other Fees
Total
2015
2014
$
$
8,500 $
--
8,500 $
8,500
--
8,500
In the above table, in accordance with the SEC’s definitions and rules, “audit fees” are fees that Trxade Group, Inc.
paid for professional services for the audit of our consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K and for
services that are normally provided by the registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory
filings or engagements; “audit-related fees” are fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the
performance of the audit or review of our financial statements; and “tax fees” are fees for tax compliance, tax advice and
tax planning.
All of the audit-related services and other services described in the above table were pre-approved by our Audit
Committee. The Audit Committee has adopted a pre-approval policy that provides for the pre-approval of all services
performed for us by MaloneBailey, LLP. The policy authorizes the Audit Committee to delegate to one or more of its
members pre-approval authority with respect to permitted services. Pursuant to this policy, the Audit Committee
delegated such authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. All pre-approval decisions must be reported to the
Audit Committee at its next meeting.
36
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Exhibit
Number
3.1
3.2
10.1
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.9
10.12
10.13
10.13
10.14
14.1
21.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101
Description
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Trxade Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference as Appendix A to
the Schedule 14C Information Statement of Trxade Group, Inc., File No. 000-55218, filed on May 18, 2015).
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Trxade Group, Inc., (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement
on Form 10 of Trxade Group, Inc., File No. 000-55218, filed on July 23, 2014).
Merger and Reorganization Agreement of XCELLINK INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation (predecessor to Trxade
Group, Inc. a Delaware corporation) and Trxade Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registration Statement on Form 10 of Trxade Group, Inc., File No. 000-55218, filed on June 6, 2014).
2014 Equity Incentive Plan of Trxade Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration Statement on
Form 10 of Trxade Group, Inc., File No. 000-55218, filed on June 6, 2014).*
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Trxade Group, Inc. and its directors and certain officers
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 of Trxade Group, Inc., File No. 000-55218,
filed on June 6, 2014).*
Executive Employment Agreement with Trxade, Inc. (subsidiary of Trxade Group, Inc.) and Suren Ajjarapu (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 of Trxade Group, Inc., File No. 000-55218, filed on July 23,
2014).*
Executive Employment Agreement with Trxade, Inc. (subsidiary of Trxade Group, Inc.) and Prashant Patel (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 of Trxade Group, Inc., File No. 000-55218, filed on July 23,
2014).*
Logistics Services Agreement with RXTPL and Westminster Pharmaceuticals, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of Trxade
Group, Inc.) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 of Trxade Group, Inc., File No.
000-55218, filed on September 5, 2014.
Note Purchase Agreement with Westminster Pharmaceuticals, LLC (wholly-owned subsidiary of Trxade Group, Inc.)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Trxade Group, Inc., File No. 000-55218, filed on
October 27, 2015.
Form of Note with Westminster Pharmaceuticals, LLC (wholly-owned subsidiary of Trxade Group, Inc.) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Trxade Group, Inc., File No. 000-55218, filed on October 27, 2015.
Warrant Agreement with Westminster Pharmaceuticals, LLC (wholly-owned subsidiary of Trxade Group, Inc.) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Trxade Group, Inc., File No. 000-55218, filed on October 27, 2015.
Warrant Agreement with Westminster Pharmaceuticals, LLC (wholly-owned subsidiary of Trxade Group, Inc.) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Trxade Group, Inc., File No. 000-55218, filed on October 27, 2015.
Amendment to Ajjarapu Executive Employment Agreement* (filed herewith)
Code of Ethics of Trxade Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 14.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trxade
Group, Inc., File No. 000-55218, filed on March 23, 2015
List of subsidiaries of Trxade Group, Inc.
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The following financial information from the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trxade Group, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 2015, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31,
2015, and 2014; (2) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014; (3) Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014; (4) Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows for years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014; and (5) Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.**
____________
*
**
Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which one or more directors or executive
officers participate.
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in Exhibit 101 (a) is “furnished” and is not deemed to be
“filed” or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, (b) is deemed not to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and (c) is not otherwise subject to liability under those sections.
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: March 28, 2016
Trxade Group, Inc.
By: /s/ Suren Ajjarapu
Suren Ajjarapu,
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
/s/ Suren Ajjarapu
Suren Ajjarapu
/s/ Prashant Patel
Prashant Patel
/s/ Howard A. Doss
Howard Doss
/s/ Fernando Sanchez
Fernando Sanchez
/s/ Donald G Fell
Donald G Fell
Title
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date
March 28, 2016
Chief Operating Officer, President and Director
March 28, 2016
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Director
Director
March 28, 2016
March 28, 2016
March 28, 2016
38
EXHIBIT 10.14
AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
TRXADE GROUP, INC.
THIS AMENDMENT EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is executed as of
this 22nd of April, 2016 (“Effective Date”) by and among TRXADE, INC. a Florida corporation (the “Company”),
TRXADE GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation and parent to the Company, (the “Parent”), and Suren Ajjarapu
(the “Executive”).
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, on May 24, 2013, the Company and Executive entered into that certain Executive Employment
Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), attached hereto as Exhibit A, together with a Shareholders Agreement,
which was previously cancelled by all parties, and a Stock Purchase Agreement;
WHEREAS, the Company is wholly-owned by Parent;
WHEREAS, the Executive, Company and Parent desire to increase the Base Salary of Executive under the
Employment Agreement;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises and covenants herein
contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.
Amendments to the Employment Agreement. The following amendment is hereby made to the
Employment Agreement. As described under Section 6(a) Compensation, to the Employment Agreement, the “Base
Salary” is hereby increased from $100,000.00 to One Hundred and Sixty Five Thousand ($165,000.00). The Bonus
terms under Section 6(b) remain the same.
2.
Limited Effect. Except as amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect, and the valid and binding obligation of the parties thereto.
3.
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, have caused this Amendment to Executive Employment
Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first written above.
COMPANY: TRXADE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION.
By: /s/ Prashant Patel
Prashant Patel, President
Trxade, Inc. 1115 Gunn Hwy., Odessa, Florida 33556
PARENT: TRXADE GROUP, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION
By: :/s/ Prashant Patel
Prashant Patel, President
TRXADE GROUP, INC., 1115 Gunn Hwy., Odessa, Florida 33556
EXECUTIVE: SUREN AJJARAPU
By:/s/ Suren Ajjarapu
Suren Ajjarapu
Address:
C/O TRXADE GROUP, INC., 1115 Gunn Hwy., Odessa, Florida 33556
EXHIBIT 21.1
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
Trxade, Inc., a Florida corporation.
Westminster Pharmaceutical LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
Pinnacle Tek, Inc., a Florida corporation.
EXHIBIT 31.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
I, Suren Ajjarapu, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Trxade Group, Inc.;
2.
3.
4.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 28, 2016
/s/ Suren Ajjarapu
Name: Suren Ajjarapu
Title: Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
I, Howard A. Doss, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Trxade Group, Inc.;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
2.
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
3.
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 28, 2016
/s/ Howard A. Doss
Howard A. Doss
Name:
Chief Financial Officer
Title:
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Trxade Group, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.
Dated: March 28, 2016
/s/ Suren Ajjarapu
Suren Ajjarapu
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Trxade Group, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.
Dated: March 28, 2016
/s/ Howard A. Doss
Howard A. Doss
Chief Financial Officer