More annual reports from Twin Disc:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of Twin Disc:
Velan2 0 1 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T GLOBAL REACH. CUSTOMER FOCUS. “We listen to and collaborate with our key customers to drive innovation and deliver engineering excellence.” Wherever we are around the world, we are there with local expertise. Through the quality of our people who live and work in our global communities, Twin Disc has a wealth of market, product and application expertise. We leverage that expertise to help our customers solve problems and capitalize on market opportunities with applications ranging from road pavers to cranes, mining trucks to logging equipment, airport firefighting vehicles to work boats. Collaboration is key. Each and every customer is facing a unique challenge. Our capability and long history of working together to solve those challenges positions us to deliver engineering excellence that is unmatched in the industries we serve. SALES BY REGION Europe/Middle East/Africa 19.8% North America 54.5% Asia/Pacific 21.1% Other 4.6% 1 21%74%63BEYOND THE STATUS QUO. “Our organizational restructuring makes us an easier company for our customers to do business with.” 2 BEYOND THE STATUS QUO. To Our Shareholders Fiscal 2015 came in like a lion, and went out like a lamb. We saw positive top and bottom-line results, especially compared to our last two fiscal years. Through the first eight months of the year, we experienced solid demand from our North American pressure pumping customers and also positive demand for our marine transmissions and aftermarket activity. The weakness in the Oil and Gas market over the final four months, especially in North America and China, put the brakes on what was shaping up to be a great fiscal year. Revenue results were also offset by the impact of the strengthening U.S. dollar on foreign currency transactions. Over the past several years, we have significantly strengthened our balance sheet and adjusted our business plan to provide greater flexibility and resources to weather the cyclical nature of our end markets, especially the Oil and Gas sector. I believe fiscal 2015 will be defined as the year that helped Twin Disc move beyond the status quo and shape a bright new future, as we made significant progress on a number of key initiatives: G Strategic cost restructuring to match more appropriately our capacity and overhead to market demand G Diversification of our business portfolio through aggressive growth initiatives in our industrial products markets, and strategic acquisitions in existing or adjacent markets G A “think global, act local” organizational restructuring that makes it easier to do business with us Our cost restructuring initiative balances short-term tactical cost-reduction measures with longer-term initiatives that support growth opportunities in new and emerging markets. For example, we continue to look for ways to reduce our invested capital in mature or stagnating markets and redeploy it in new product development or acquisition opportunities. Meanwhile, our new facility in India is now operating at full production, providing greater capacity for products in emerging industrial markets essential to our diversification strategy. 3 We are diligently exploring acquisition opportunities that support diversification into markets less affected by Oil and Gas. A key part of our due diligence process is ensuring that the company and its products align with our DNA, so we can cost-effectively integrate operations without adding administration and support functions. In January, we implemented a global organizational structure to centralize key functions and better harness our strong, local presence with processes that increase speed to market and enhance responsivity to clients. Engineering, sales, marketing, operations and product service are now aligned around a global structure that better positions us to collaborate with our customers, deliver complex solutions and ensure exceptional product quality and worldwide support. 2016 Outlook Fiscal 2016 will be a challenging year, as we expect results in the first two fiscal quarters will be similar to the last half of fiscal 2015. We should see improved results in the 2nd half of fiscal 2016, as the actions we’re implementing generate improved returns, profitable top line growth and greater shareholder value. My father and Twin Disc Board Chairman Michael Batten passed away earlier this year. Yet, he remains an integral part of our company’s culture. Dad was fond of saying that life is 3D; you have to see it from everyone’s perspective to really understand where you are and where you are going. That explains why at Twin Disc, we believe that our best ideas come from listening to our customers. I am thankful to our global Twin Disc team who value our customers as much as I do. I also want to thank our shareholders for your ongoing commitment, support and trust. The road ahead will be demanding, but we are clearly on the right course to build a brighter future for our customers, our employees and our shareholders. John H. Batten President, Chief Executive Officer 4 SET FOR THE FUTURE. “We are now aligned around a global structure that better positions us to collaborate with our customers...” John Batten 5 Closer to our Customers. Engineering Excellence. Around the world, we leverage local Twin Disc expertise to make things work better for our customers in a broad range of industries and applications. It’s a simple formula: we listen to our customers and respond with innovative solutions that meet their specific needs. PLEASURE CRAFT Maritimo M58 Cruising Motoryacht Precision control at your fingertips Dan Plath has been a boating enthusiast all his life and a yacht owner for the past decade. He recently purchased a Maritimo M58, 61' motor yacht from Hampton Yacht Group of California. Solution Dan’s M58 is equipped with Twin Disc’s Express Joystick System (EJS®), Express Positioning™ and Quickshift® transmission. With this package, his M58 has exceptional slow speed control and can be easily moved in any direction during docking and tight maneuvering. Express Positioning allows him to maintain a fixed position in a canal’s current, or while waiting for a bridge or a lock to open. Benefit With the Twin Disc EJS, Dan can handle his yacht with ease coming into and out of marinas. The Quickshift transmissions ensure that the boat handles smoothly and doesn’t lurch forward, while the EJS offers easy, fingertip control for direction and speed. INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS VEHICLE Entech Industries Removing uncertainty from the equation Entech Industries manufactures high performance dust collectors for a variety of applications, ranging from bridge rehabilitation to hazardous waste remediation. Solution Entech is currently field testing the Twin Disc RO-211 Remote Over Center PTO for one of its large, trailer-mounted dust collectors. The RO-211 leverages a patent-pending design to remotely engage the PTO’s over-center mechanism via an electronic control. Benefit Entech’s dust collectors are used in applications with different operators on single or multiple jobsites. The RO-211 takes the guesswork out of the equation; the operator simply engages the clutch with the press of a button and the electronic controller takes over the engagement process, greatly minimizing the potential for operator error and costly downtime. 6 LISTENING + RESPONSABILITY = INNOVATION. Penguin International We deliver on our promise Penguin International manufactures high-speed commercial vessels, including its Flex series of multi-role crew boats. These crew boats take on a variety of offshore duties, including crew transfer, cargo transport, platform security and emergency evacuations. Solution Penguin puts a high priority on transmission and propulsion systems that are robust and reliable, yet simple and cost-effective. That’s why virtually all of its mid-sized Flex crew boats built in the last nine years have Twin Disc transmission systems. Benefit Twin Disc consistently delivers customized transmission and propulsion solutions that ensure Penguin’s crew boats perform at desired speed, comply with Penguin’s high standards for quality and reliability; and help Penguin meet the escalating demand for its crew boats on a timely basis. Despite very tight production schedules, Penguin knows that Twin Disc will deliver what it promises and quickly resolve any issues that may arise. Rosenbauer Divide power, conquer disasters Rosenbauer’s Panther fire truck is considered best-in-class for Aircraft Rescue Fire Fighting (ARFF). Speed, safety, and outstanding firefighting performance are critical, as the Panther responds to airport disasters worldwide. Solution The Panther utilizes a sophisticated Twin Disc transmission system with an engine-mounted torque converter, 6-speed TD61-1179 or 8-speed TAD81-4001 power-shift transmission, and the advanced TDEC-500 electronic control system. Benefit The Twin Disc torque converter’s power dividing capability allows the Panther to be driven and use the fire pump at the same time, eliminating the need for a second engine. The Twin Disc electronic control system integrates the drive mode, PTO engagement and pump and roll, so the vehicle operator can concentrate on the task at hand. Rosenbauer has recently launched a new version of its Panther series with an 8-speed Twin Disc 4001 transmission, offering even better acceleration and fuel economy. COMMERCIAL MARINE TRANSMISSIONS SYSTEMS 7 (In thousands, except per share and shares outstanding data.) Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities (in thousands) Capital Expenditures (in thousands) Diluted Earnings per Share Dividends $30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 $17,060 $12,000 9,000 6,000 3,000 0 $9,049 $2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 .99 .36 2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015 8 (In thousands, except per share data.) FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 2013 2014 2015Net Sales $285,282 $263,909 $265,790Net Earnings 3,882 3,644 11,173 Basic Earnings Per Share 0.34 0.32 0.99 Diluted Earnings Per Share 0.34 0.32 0.99 Dividends Per Share 0.36 0.36 0.36 Average Basic Shares Outstanding 11,304,280 11,258,342 11,273,697 Average Diluted Shares Outstanding 11,377,091 11,264,421 11,277,363 Operating Results by Quarter 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Year Results2015 Net Sales $64,824 $72,691 $60,941 $67,334 $265,790 Gross Profit 22,389 22,103 19,006 19,534 83,032 Net Earnings 4,043 3,747 2,946 437 11,173 Basic Earnings Per Share 0.36 0.33 0.26 0.04 0.99 Diluted Earnings Per Share 0.36 0.33 0.26 0.04 0.99 Dividends Per Share 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.36 Stock Price Range (High-Low) 34.38-25.51 28.19-18.05 21.12-15.66 19.67-17.03 34.38-15.66 2014 Net Sales $66,426 $63,212 $60,705 $73,566 $263,909 Gross Profit 20,667 18,544 16,528 21,515 77,254 Net Earnings (Loss) 1,277 518 (475) 2,324 3,644 Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share 0.11 0.05 (0.04) 0.20 0.32 Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share 0.11 0.05 (0.04) 0.20 0.32 Dividends Per Share 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.36 Stock Price Range (High-Low) 27.32-22.67 29.00-24.16 27.88-18.67 34.34-23.41 34.34-18.67UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20549 FORM 10 K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015 Commission File Number 1-7635 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) Wisconsin (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 1328 Racine Street, Racine, Wisconsin (Address of Principal Executive Office) 39-0667110 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 53403 (Zip Code) Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code: (262) 638-4000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Common stock, no par Preferred stock purchase rights Name of each exchange on which registered: The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES [ ] NO [ √ ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES [ ] NO [ √ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [√ ] NO [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES [√ ] NO [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10 K or any amendment to this Form 10 K [√ ]. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Large Accelerated Filer [ ] Accelerated Filer [ √ ] Non-accelerated Filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES [ ] NO [ √ ] At December 26, 2014, the last business day of the registrant’s second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non affiliates of the registrant was $171,061,739. Determination of stock ownership by affiliates was made solely for the purpose of responding to this requirement and registrant is not bound by this determination for any other purpose. At August 19, 2015, the registrant had 11,323,394 shares of its common stock outstanding. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held October 23, 2015, which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report, are incorporated by reference into Part III. 9 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED Table of Contents TWIN DISC, INC. - FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 PART I Item 1. Item 1A. Item 1B. Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. PART II Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Business. Risk Factors. Unresolved Staff Comments. Properties. Legal Proceedings. Mine Safety Disclosure. Executive Officers of the Registrant. Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters. Selected Financial Data. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Item 7(a). Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk. Item 8. Item 9. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Change In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. Item 9(a). Controls and Procedures. Item 9(b). Other Information. PART III Item 10. Item 11. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant. Executive Compensation. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, Director Independence. Principal Accounting Fees and Services. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules. Signatures. Exhibit Index. Item 13. Item 14. PART IV Item 15. 10 11 12 14 14 15 15 15 16 17 17 29 30 30 30 31 31 32 32 32 32 32 62 63 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORT PART I Item 1. Business Twin Disc was incorporated under the laws of the state of Wisconsin in 1918. Twin Disc designs, manufactures and sells marine and heavy duty off highway power transmission equipment. Products offered include: marine transmissions, surface drives, propellers and boat management systems as well as power-shift transmissions, hydraulic torque converters, power take-offs, industrial clutches and controls systems. The Company sells its products to customers primarily in the commercial, pleasure craft, and military marine markets as well as in the energy and natural resources, government and industrial markets. The Company’s worldwide sales to both domestic and foreign customers are transacted through a direct sales force and a distributor network. The products described above have accounted for more than 90% of revenues in each of the last three fiscal years. Most of the Company’s products are machined from cast iron, forgings, cast aluminum and bar steel which generally are available from multiple sources and which are believed to be in adequate supply. The Company has pursued a policy of applying for patents in both the United States and certain foreign countries on inventions made in the course of its development work for which commercial applications are considered probable. The Company regards its patents collectively as important but does not consider its business dependent upon any one of such patents. The business is not considered to be seasonal except to the extent that employee vacations, particularly in Europe, are taken mainly in the months of July and August, curtailing production during that period. The Company’s products receive direct widespread competition, including from divisions of other larger independent manufacturers. The Company also competes for business with parts manufacturing divisions of some of its major customers. The primary competitive factors for the Company’s products are design, technology, performance, price, service and availability. The Company’s top ten customers accounted for approximately 43% of the Company’s consolidated net sales during the year ended June 30, 2015. There was one customer, Sewart Supply, Inc., an authorized distributor of the Company, that accounted for 11% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2015. Unfilled open orders for the next six months of $34,397,000 at June 30, 2015 compares to $66,102,000 at June 30, 2014. Since orders are subject to cancellation and rescheduling by the customer, the six month order backlog is considered more representative of operating conditions than total backlog. However, as procurement and manufacturing “lead times” change, the backlog will increase or decrease, and thus it does not necessarily provide a valid indicator of the shipping rate. Cancellations are generally the result of rescheduling activity and do not represent a material change in backlog. Management recognizes that there are attendant risks that foreign governments may place restrictions on dividend payments and other movements of money, but these risks are considered minimal due to the political relations the United States maintains with the countries in which the Company operates or the relatively low investment within individual countries. No material portion of the Company’s business is subject to renegotiation of profits or termination of contracts at the election of the U.S. government. Engineering and development costs include research and development expenses for new product development and major improvements to existing products, and other costs for ongoing efforts to refine existing products. Research and development costs charged to operations totaled $2,288,000, $3,028,000 and $3,058,000 in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Total engineering and development costs were $11,091,000, $10,900,000 and $10,242,000 in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Compliance with federal, state and local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, is not anticipated to have a material effect on capital expenditures, earnings or the competitive position of the Company. The number of persons employed by the Company at June 30, 2015 was 921. A summary of financial data by segment and geographic area for the years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 appears in Note J to the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s internet website address is www.twindisc.com. The Company makes available free of charge (other than an investor’s own internet access charges) through its website the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files such material with, or furnishes such material to, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, the Company makes available, through its website, important corporate governance materials. This information is also available from the Company upon request. The Company is not including the information contained on or available through its website as a part of, or incorporating such information by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 11 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDItem 1A. Risk Factors The Company’s business involves risk. The following information about these risks should be considered carefully together with other information contained in this report. The risks described below are not the only risks the Company faces. Additional risks not currently known, deemed immaterial or that could apply to any issuer may also result in adverse results for the Company’s business. As a global company, we are subject to currency fluctuations and any significant movement between the U.S. dollar and the euro, in particular, could have an adverse effect on our profitability. Although the Company’s financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, a significant portion of our sales and operating costs are realized in euros and other foreign currencies. The Company’s profitability is affected by movements of the U.S. dollar against the euro and the other currencies in which we generate revenues and incur expenses. Significant long- term fluctuations in relative currency values, in particular a significant change in the relative values of the U.S. dollar or euro, could have an adverse effect on our profitability and financial condition. Certain of the Company’s products are directly or indirectly used in oil exploration and oil drilling, and are thus dependent upon the strength of those markets and oil prices. In recent years, the Company has seen significant variations in the sales of its products that are used in oil and energy related markets. The variability in these markets has been defined by the change in oil prices and the global demand for oil. In fiscal 2009, a significant decrease in oil prices, the demand for oil and capital investment in the oil and energy markets had an adverse effect on the sales of these products and ultimately on the Company’s profitability. While this market recovered to historically high levels in fiscal 2011 and 2012, the Company has since experienced a softening in demand through fiscal 2015. The cyclical nature of the global oil and gas market presents the ongoing possibility of a severe cutback in demand, which would create a significant adverse effect on the sales of these products and ultimately on the Company’s profitability. Many of the Company’s product markets are cyclical in nature or are otherwise sensitive to volatile or variable factors. A downturn or weakness in overall economic activity or fluctuations in those other factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s overall financial performance. Historically, sales of many of the products that the Company manufactures and sells have been subject to cyclical variations caused by changes in general economic conditions and other factors. In particular, the Company sells its products to customers primarily in the pleasure craft, commercial and military marine markets, as well as in the energy and natural resources, government and industrial markets. The demand for the products may be impacted by the strength of the economy generally, governmental spending and appropriations, including security and defense outlays, fuel prices, interest rates, as well as many other factors. Adverse economic and other conditions may cause the Company’s customers to forego or otherwise postpone purchases in favor of repairing existing equipment. In the event of an increase in the global demand for steel, the Company could be adversely affected if it experiences shortages of raw castings and forgings used in the manufacturing of its products. With the continued development of certain developing economies, in particular China and India, the global demand for steel has risen significantly in recent years. The Company selects its suppliers based on a number of criteria, and we expect that they will be able to support our growing needs. However, there can be no assurance that a significant increase in demand, capacity constraints or other issues experienced by the Company’s suppliers will not result in shortages or delays in their supply of raw materials to the Company. If the Company were to experience a significant or prolonged shortage of critical components from any of its suppliers, particularly those who are sole sources, and could not procure the components from other sources, the Company would be unable to meet its production schedules for some of its key products and would miss product delivery dates which would adversely affect our sales, profitability and relationships with our customers. The Company continues to face the prospect of increasing commodity costs, including steel, other raw materials and energy that could have an adverse effect on future profitability. To date, the Company has been successful with offsetting the effects of increased commodity costs through cost reduction programs and pricing actions. However, if material prices were to continue to increase at a rate that could not be recouped through product pricing, it could potentially have an adverse effect on our future profitability. If the Company were to lose business with any key customers, the Company’s business would be adversely affected. Although there was only one customer, Sewart Supply, Inc., that accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2015, deterioration of a business relationship with one or more of the Company’s significant customers would cause its sales and profitability to be adversely affected. The termination of relationships with the Company’s suppliers, or the inability of such suppliers to perform, could disrupt its business and have an adverse effect on its ability to manufacture and deliver products. The Company relies on raw materials, component parts, and services supplied by outside third parties. If a supplier of significant raw materials, component parts or services were to terminate its relationship with the Company, or otherwise cease supplying raw materials, component parts, or services consistent with past practice, the Company’s ability to meet its obligations to its customers may be affected. Such a disruption with respect to numerous products, or with respect to a few significant products, could have an adverse effect on the Company’s profitability and financial condition. 12 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTA significant design, manufacturing or supplier quality issue could result in recalls or other actions by the Company that could adversely affect profitability. As a manufacturer of highly engineered products, the performance, reliability and productivity of the Company’s products is one of its competitive advantages. While the Company prides itself on putting in place procedures to ensure the quality and performance of its products and suppliers, a significant quality or product issue, whether due to design, performance, manufacturing or supplier quality issue, could lead to warranty actions, scrapping of raw materials, finished goods or returned products, the deterioration in a customer relationship, or other action that could adversely affect warranty and quality costs, future sales and profitability. The Company faces risks associated with its international sales and operations that could adversely affect its business, results of operations or financial condition. Sales to customers outside the United States approximated 51% of our consolidated net sales for fiscal 2015. We have international manufacturing operations in Belgium, Italy, India and Switzerland. In addition, we have international distribution operations in Singapore, China, Australia, Japan, Italy, India and Canada. Our international sales and operations are subject to a number of risks, including: ¨ currency exchange rate fluctuations ¨ export and import duties, changes to import and export regulations, and restrictions on the transfer of funds ¨ problems with the transportation or delivery of our products ¨ issues arising from cultural or language differences and labor unrest ¨ longer payment cycles and greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivables ¨ compliance with trade and other laws in a variety of jurisdictions ¨ changes in tax law These factors could adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. A material disruption at the Company’s manufacturing facilities in Racine, Wisconsin could adversely affect its ability to generate sales and meet customer demand. The majority of the Company’s manufacturing, based on fiscal 2015’s sales, came from its two facilities in Racine, Wisconsin. If operations at these facilities were to be disrupted as a result of significant equipment failures, natural disasters, power outages, fires, explosions, adverse weather conditions or other reasons, the Company’s business and results of operations could be adversely affected. Interruptions in production would increase costs and reduce sales. Any interruption in production capability could require the Company to make substantial capital expenditures to remedy the situation, which could negatively affect its profitability and financial condition. The Company maintains property damage insurance which it believes to be adequate to provide for reconstruction of its facilities and equipment, as well as business interruption insurance to mitigate losses resulting from any production interruption or shutdown caused by an insured loss. However, any recovery under this insurance policy may not offset the lost sales or increased costs that may be experienced during the disruption of operations. Lost sales may not be recoverable under the policy and long-term business disruptions could result in a loss of customers. If this were to occur, future sales levels and costs of doing business, and therefore profitability, could be adversely affected. Any failure to meet our debt obligations and satisfy financial covenants could adversely affect our business and financial condition. Beginning in 2008 and continuing into 2010, general worldwide economic conditions experienced a downturn due to the combined effects of the subprime lending crisis, general credit market crisis, collateral effects on the finance and banking industries, slower economic activity, decreased consumer confidence, reduced corporate profits and capital spending, adverse business conditions and liquidity concerns. While some recovery was seen in the markets served by the Company in 2011 through 2015, these conditions made it difficult for customers, vendors and the Company to accurately forecast and plan future business activities, and caused U.S. and foreign businesses to slow spending on products, which delayed and lengthened sales cycles. These conditions led to declining revenues in several of the Company’s divisions in fiscal 2009 and 2010. The Company’s revolving credit facility and senior notes agreement require it to maintain specified quarterly financial covenants such as a minimum consolidated net worth amount, a minimum Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”), as defined, for the most recent four fiscal quarters of $11,000,000 and a funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.0 or less. At June 30, 2015, the Company was in compliance with these financial covenants. Based on its annual financial plan, the Company believes that it will generate sufficient EBITDA levels throughout fiscal 2016 in order to maintain compliance with its financial covenants. However, as with all forward-looking information, there can be no assurance that the Company will achieve the planned results in future periods especially due to the significant uncertainties flowing from the current economic environment. If the Company is not able to achieve these objectives and to meet the required covenants under the agreements, the Company may require forbearance from its existing lenders in the form of waivers and/or amendments of its credit facilities or be required to arrange alternative financing. Failure to obtain relief from covenant violations or to obtain alternative financing, if necessary, would have a material adverse impact on the Company. 13 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDThe Company may experience negative or unforeseen tax consequences. The Company reviews the probability of the realization of our net deferred tax assets each period based on forecasts of taxable income in both the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. This review uses historical results, projected future operating results based upon approved business plans, eligible carryforward periods, tax planning opportunities and other relevant considerations. Adverse changes in the profitability and financial outlook in the U.S. or foreign jurisdictions may require the creation of a valuation allowance to reduce our net deferred tax assets. Such changes could result in material non-cash expenses in the period in which the changes are made and could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. Taxing authority challenges may lead to tax payments exceeding current reserves. The Company is subject to ongoing tax examinations in various jurisdictions. As a result, the Company may record incremental tax expense based on expected outcomes of such matters. In addition, the Company may adjust previously reported tax reserves based on expected results of these examinations. Such adjustments could result in an increase or decrease to the Company’s effective tax rate. Future changes in tax law in various jurisdictions around the world and income tax holidays could have a material impact on the Company’s effective tax rate, foreign rate differential, future income tax expense and cash flows. Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise the Company’s information and expose it to liability, which would cause its business and reputation to suffer. In the ordinary course of its business, the Company collects and stores sensitive data, including its proprietary business information and that of its customers, suppliers and business partners, as well as personally identifiable information of its customers and employees, in its internal and external data centers, cloud services, and on its networks. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to the Company’s operations and business strategy. Despite the Company’s security measures, its information technology and infrastructure, and that of its partners, may be vulnerable to malicious attacks or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions, including as a result of rollouts of new systems. Any such breach or operational failure would compromise the Company’s networks and/or that of its partners and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings and/or regulatory penalties, disrupt the Company’s operations, damage its reputation, and/or cause a loss of confidence in its products and services, which could adversely affect its business. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. Item 2. Properties Manufacturing Segment The Company owns two manufacturing, assembly and office facilities in Racine, Wisconsin, U.S.A., one in Nivelles, Belgium, two in Decima, Italy and one in Novazzano, Switzerland. The aggregate floor space of these six plants approximates 767,000 square feet. One of the Racine facilities includes office space, which includes the Company’s corporate headquarters. The Company leases additional manufacturing, assembly and office facilities in Italy (Limite sull’Arno) and India (manufacturing facility in Kancheepuram). Distribution Segment The Company also has operations in the following locations, all of which are leased and are used for sales offices, warehousing and light assembly or product service: Jacksonville, Florida, U.S.A. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Medley, Florida, U.S.A. Tampa, Florida, U.S.A. Coburg, Oregon, U.S.A. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Perth, Western Australia, Australia Singapore Shanghai, China Guangzhou, China Chennai, India Kent, Washington, U.S.A. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Saitama City, Japan The Company believes its properties are well maintained and adequate for its present and anticipated needs. Item 3. Legal Proceedings Twin Disc is a defendant in several product liability or related claims of which the ultimate outcome and liability to the Company, if any, are not presently determinable. Management believes that the final disposition of such litigation will not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or statement of cash flows. 14 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTItem 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable. Executive Officers of the Registrant Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10 K, the following list is included as an unnumbered Item in Part I of this Report in lieu of being included in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on October 23, 2015. Name John H. Batten Jeffrey S. Knutson Malcolm F. Moore Dean J. Bratel Denise L. Wilcox Michael B. Gee Debbie A. Lange Age Position 50 50 65 51 58 48 57 President – Chief Executive Officer Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary Executive Vice President – Operations Vice President – Global Sales and Marketing Vice President – Human Resources Vice President – Corporate Engineering Corporate Controller Officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors at the Board meeting held in conjunction with each Annual Meeting of the Shareholders. Each officer holds office until a successor is duly elected, or until he/she resigns or is removed from office. John H. Batten, President – Chief Executive Officer. Effective November 1, 2013, Mr. Batten was named President – Chief Executive Officer. Prior to this promotion, Mr. Batten served as President and Chief Operating Officer since July 2008, Executive Vice President since November 2004, Vice President and General Manager – Marine and Propulsion since October 2001 and Commercial Manager – Marine and Propulsion since 1998. Mr. Batten joined Twin Disc in 1996 as an Application Engineer. Mr. Batten is the son of the late Mr. Michael Batten, former Chairman of the Board of Directors. Jeffrey S. Knutson, Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. Mr. Knutson was named Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in June 2015. Mr. Knutson was named Vice President – Finance, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer in February 2015. Mr. Knutson was appointed Corporate Secretary in June 2013, and was Corporate Controller from his appointment in October 2005 until August 2015. Mr. Knutson joined the Company in February 2005 as Controller of North American Operations. Prior to joining Twin Disc, Mr. Knutson held Operational Controller positions with Tower Automotive (since August 2002) and Rexnord Corporation (since November 1998). Malcolm F. Moore, Executive Vice President – Operations. Mr. Moore was hired as Executive Vice President Finance – Operations effective July 1, 2015 after resigning from Twin Disc Board of Directors on June 30, 2015. Prior to joining Twin Disc, Mr. Moore was President and CEO of Digi-Star LLC, a leading supplier of electronic components and software used in precision agriculture. Prior to leading Digi-Star, he held a variety of positions including Executive Vice President and COO, President and COO, and President and CEO of Gehl Company, a publicly-owned manufacturer and distributor of equipment used in construction and agriculture. Dean J. Bratel, Vice President – Global Sales and Marketing. Mr. Bratel was promoted to his current role in January 2015 after serving as Vice President – Americas (since June 2013), Vice President – Engineering (since November 2004), Director of Corporate Engineering (since January 2003), Chief Engineer (since October 2001) and Engineering Manager (since December 1999). Mr. Bratel joined Twin Disc in 1987. Denise L. Wilcox, Vice President – Human Resources. After joining the Company as Manager Compensation & Benefits in September 1998, Ms. Wilcox was promoted to Director Corporate Human Resources in March 2002 and to her current role in November 2004. Prior to joining Twin Disc, Ms. Wilcox held positions with Johnson International and Runzheimer International. Michael B. Gee, Vice President – Corporate Engineering. Mr. Gee was promoted to his current role in January 2015 after serving as Director of Engineering. Mr. Gee joined Twin Disc in 1990 and has held several positions, including: Experimental Engineer, Design Engineer, Project Engineer, Engineering Manager and Chief Engineer. Debbie A. Lange, Corporate Controller. Ms. Lange was hired as Corporate Controller effective August 4, 2015. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Lange was the Director of Accounting Research & Special Projects at Sealed Air Corporation (since 2011), a global manufacturer and provider of food packaging solutions, product packaging and cleaning and hygiene solutions. Prior to the role at Sealed Air, Ms. Lange held the position of Director of Global Accounting and Reporting at Diversey, Inc. (since 2008), a global marketer and manufacturer of cleaning, hygiene, operational efficiency, appearance enhancing products, and equipment and related services for the institutional and industrial cleaning and sanitation market. 15 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDPART II Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters The Company’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol TWIN. The price information below represents the high and low sales prices per quarter from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2015: Quarter First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/15 Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/14 High $34.38 28.19 21.12 19.67 Low $25.51 18.05 15.66 17.03 Dividend $0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 High $27.32 29.00 27.88 34.34 Low $22.67 24.16 18.67 23.41 Dividend $0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 For information regarding the Company’s equity-based compensation plans, see the discussion under Item 12 of this report. As of August 19, 2015, shareholders of record numbered 530. The closing price of Twin Disc common stock as of August 19, 2015 was $14.37. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Period March 28, 2015 – April 24, 2015 April 25, 2015 – May 29, 2015 May 30, 2015 - June 30, 2015 Total (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased (b) Average Price Paid per Share (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (d) Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 315,000 315,000 315,000 315,000 On February 1, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to 500,000 shares of Common Stock at market values, of which 250,000 shares were purchased during fiscal 2009 and 125,000 shares were purchased during fiscal 2012. On July 27, 2012, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of an additional 375,000 shares of Common Stock at market values. This authorization has no expiration. During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company purchased 185,000 shares under this authorization. Performance Graph The following table compares total shareholder return over the last five fiscal years to the Standard & Poor’s 500 Machinery (Industrial) Index and the Russell 2000 index. The S&P 500 Machinery (Industrial) Index consists of a broad range of manufacturers. The Russell 2000 Index consists of a broad range of 2,000 companies. The Company believes, because of the similarity of its business with those companies contained in the S&P 500 Machinery (Industrial) Index, that comparison of shareholder return with this index is appropriate. Total return values for the Corporation’s common stock, the S&P 500 Machinery (Industrial) Index and the Russell 2000 Index were calculated based upon an assumption of a $100 investment on June 30, 2010 and based upon cumulative total return values assuming reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis. 16 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORT Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return Twin Disc, Incorporated, S&P Machinery, Russell 2000 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 100.00 100.00 100.00 344.51 155.89 137.40 Twin Disc S&P Machinery Russell 2000 217.60 167.09 163.60 220.46 214.30 206.59 220.00 207.83 176.32 166.90 136.98 134.54 June 30, 2010 June 30, 2011 June 30, 2012 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2015 Item 6. Selected Financial Data Financial Highlights (in thousands, except per share amounts) Fiscal Years Ended June 30, Statement of Operations Data: 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 Net sales Net earnings attributable to Twin Disc Basic earnings per share attributable to Twin Disc common shareholders Diluted earnings per share attributable to Twin Disc common shareholders Dividends per share $265,790 $263,909 $285,282 $355,870 $310,393 11,173 0.99 0.99 0.36 3,644 0.32 0.32 0.36 3,882 0.34 0.34 0.36 26,743 2.34 2.31 0.34 17,997 1.59 1.57 0.30 Balance Sheet Data (at end of period): Total assets Total long-term debt $249,862 $266,985 $285,458 $303,832 10,231 14,800 23,472 28,401 $309,120 25,784 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Note on Forward-Looking Statements Statements in this report (including but not limited to certain statements in Items 1, 3 and 7) and in other Company communications that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, which are based on management’s current expectations. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from what appears here. Forward-looking statements include the Company’s description of plans and objectives for future operations and assumptions behind those plans. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” and “expects,” or similar anticipatory expressions, usually identify forward-looking statements. In addition, goals established by the Company should not be viewed as guarantees or promises of future performance. There can be no assurance the Company will be successful in achieving its goals. 17 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDIn addition to the assumptions and information referred to specifically in the forward-looking statements, other factors, including, but not limited to those factors discussed under Item 1A, Risk Factors, could cause actual results to be materially different from what is presented in any forward looking statements. Results of Operations (In thousands) Net sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit 2015 % 2014 % 2013 % $265,790 182,758 $263,909 186,655 $285,282 205,257 83,032 31.2 77,254 29.3 80,025 28.1 Marketing, engineering and administrative expenses 64,264 24.2 67,406 25.5 67,899 23.8 Restructuring of operations Impairment charge Earnings from operations Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014 3,282 – $ 15,486 1.2 0.0 5.8 961 – $ 8,887 0.4 0.0 3.4 708 1,405 $ 10,013 0.2 0.5 3.5 Net Sales Net sales for fiscal 2015 increased 0.7%, or $1.9 million, to $265.8 million from $263.9 million in fiscal 2014. Currency translation had an unfavorable impact on fiscal 2015 sales compared to the prior year totaling $8.9 million due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Asian currencies. Adjusting for constant currency, sales increased 4.1% compared to fiscal 2014. This increase was driven by strong demand, especially through the first three fiscal quarters, in the North American oil and gas market for both new units and service parts. This demand softened in the latter half of the third quarter and continued through the fourth quarter, driven by the global decline in oil prices. Offsetting the increased volume in North American oil and gas related products was weaker demand in Asia for commercial marine and oilfield transmissions. This decline is reflective of general economic conditions in the region, along with timing of oilfield related projects in China. Sales at our manufacturing segment were up 5.5%, or $12.5 million, versus the same period last year. Compared to fiscal 2014, on average, the U.S. dollar strengthened against the euro. The net translation effect of this on foreign manufacturing operations was to reduce revenues for the manufacturing segment by approximately $6.7 million versus the prior year, before eliminations. In the current fiscal year, the Company’s North American manufacturing operation, the largest, experienced a 9.3% increase in sales compared to fiscal 2014. The primary driver for this increase was stronger North American demand for oil and gas related products through the first three fiscal quarters. This demand began to slow in the third quarter and continued through the fourth quarter, driven by the decline in global oil prices. The Company’s Italian manufacturing operations, which have been adversely impacted by the softness in the European mega yacht and industrial markets, experienced a sales decrease of 7.7% compared to the prior fiscal year. The Company’s Belgian manufacturing operation saw relatively flat sales in fiscal 2015 as improved North American demand was offset by unfavorable currency movements. The Company’s Swiss manufacturing operation, which supplies customized propellers for the global mega yacht and patrol boat markets, experienced a 10.5% decrease in sales, primarily due to unfavorable currency movements along with the timing of shipments for the global patrol boat and Italian mega yacht markets. Sales at our distribution segment were down 17.0%, or $20.7 million, compared to fiscal 2014. Compared to fiscal 2014, on average, the Asian currencies weakened against the U.S. dollar. The net translation effect of this on foreign distribution operations was to decrease revenues for the distribution segment by approximately $5.4 million versus the prior year, before eliminations. The Company’s distribution operation in Singapore, its largest Company-owned distribution operation, experienced a 33.2% reduction in sales due to a decline in demand for various commercial applications and pressure-pumping transmissions for the Chinese oil and gas market following several years of very strong growth. The Company’s distribution operation in the Northwest of the United States and Southwest of Canada experienced an increase in sales of 11.6% on the strength of the North American oil and gas market through the first half of the fiscal year. The Company’s distribution operation in Australia, which provides boat accessories, propulsion and marine transmission systems for the pleasure craft market, saw an increase in sales of just over 5% from the prior fiscal year, driven by improved shipments in the Australian mega yacht market over the prior fiscal year. Net sales for the Company’s largest product market, marine transmission and propulsion systems, were down 5.6% compared to the prior fiscal year. This decrease reflects a decline in the Asian commercial marine market, continued weakness in the global pleasure craft market and a significant currency impact. Sales of the Company’s boat management systems manufactured at the Company’s Italian operation and servicing the global mega yacht market were down approximately 19.3% versus the prior fiscal year as the European mega yacht market continuing to experience softness in demand, along with the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro. In the off-highway transmission market, the 18 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTyear-over-year increase of just over 14% can be attributed primarily to increased shipments of the Company’s pressure pumping transmission systems and components to the North American oil and gas market. The increase experienced in the Company’s industrial products of just over 2% was due to increased sales into the agriculture, mining and general industrial markets, primarily in the North American and Italian markets, as well as increased activity related to the North American oil field markets. Geographically, sales to the U.S. and Canada represented 55% of consolidated sales for fiscal 2015 compared to 45% in fiscal 2014. North American sales benefited from strong demand for oil and gas related products through the first three quarters of the fiscal year. While China continued to be our second largest end market in fiscal 2015, representing 7.4% of consolidated sales, this is down from 12.8% in fiscal 2014, as demand for commercial marine and pressure pumping transmissions eased from fiscal 2014 levels. Overall sales into the Asia Pacific market represented approximately 21% of sales in fiscal 2015, compared to 29% in fiscal 2014. See Note J of the Notes to the consolidated financial statements for more information on the Company’s business segments and foreign operations. The elimination for net intra-segment and inter-segment sales decreased $10.1 million, or 11.8%, from $85.1 million in fiscal 2014 to $75.0 million in fiscal 2015. Year-over-year changes in foreign exchange rates had a net favorable impact of $3.2 million on net intra-segment and inter-segment sales. Gross Profit In fiscal 2015, gross profit increased $5.8 million, or 7.5%, to $83.0 million. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased 190 basis points in fiscal 2015 to 31.2%, compared to 29.3% in fiscal 2014. The table below summarizes the gross profit trend by quarter for fiscal years 2015 and 2014: Gross Profit: ($ millions) 2015 2014 % of Sales: 2015 2014 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr $22.4 $20.7 34.5% 31.1% $22.1 $18.6 30.4% 29.3% $19.0 $16.5 31.2% 27.2% $19.5 $21.5 29.0% 29.2% Year $83.0 $77.3 31.2% 29.3% There were a number of factors that impacted the Company’s overall gross margin rate in fiscal 2015. Gross margin for the year was favorably impacted by higher volumes, a favorable product mix, lower U.S. pension expense and favorable manufacturing absorption, partially offset by an unfavorable exchange impact. The Company estimates the net favorable impact of increased volumes on gross margin in fiscal 2015 was approximately $4.9 million. The favorable shift in product mix, primarily related to the growth experienced in the Company’s oil and gas transmission business, had an estimated favorable impact of $1.7 million. U.S. pension expense included in cost of goods sold decreased by $0.5 million in fiscal 2015. These favorable movements were partially offset by an unfavorable exchange impact of $1.8 million. The net remaining favorable year-over-year variance was primarily driven by favorable manufacturing absorption and product mix. Marketing, Engineering and Administrative (ME&A) Expenses Marketing, engineering, and administrative (ME&A) expenses of $64.3 million were down $3.1 million, or 4.7%, compared to the prior fiscal year. As a percentage of sales, ME&A expenses decreased to 24.2% of sales versus 25.5% of sales in fiscal 2014. The reduction in fiscal 2015 compared to the prior year was heavily impacted by currency movements ($2.4 million), along with one-time prior year items related to professional services and an adjustment to the cash surrender value of life insurance policies, reduced bad debt expense, lower pension expense and aggressive cost containment measures across the global organization. These savings were partially offset by an increase to bonus expense in fiscal 2015 ($3.1 million). Restructuring of Operations During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $3.3 million, or $0.29 per diluted share, associated with a reduction in workforce at its North American operation. This restructuring resulted in a reduction of 79 people through a combination of early retirement and reduction in force. During fiscal 2014, the Company recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $1.0 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, representing the incremental cost above the minimum legal indemnity for a targeted workforce reduction at its Belgian operation, following finalization of negotiations with the local labor unions. The minimum legal indemnity of $0.5 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, upon announcement of the intended restructuring action. During fiscal 2014, the Company made cash payments of $0.9 million, resulting in an accrual balance at June 30, 2014 of $0.8 million. Interest Expense Interest expense of $0.6 million for the fiscal 2015 was down 35% versus fiscal 2014. Total interest on the Company’s $60 million revolving credit facility (“revolver”) decreased 46% to $0.1 million in fiscal 2015. The decrease can be attributed to an overall decrease in the average 19 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDborrowings year-over-year. The average borrowing on the revolver, computed monthly, decreased to $10.7 million in fiscal 2015, compared to $13.2 million in the prior fiscal year. The interest rate on the revolver was a range of 1.16% to 1.85% in the prior fiscal year compared to a range of 1.16% to 1.20% in the current year. The interest expense on the Company’s $25 million Senior Note decreased $0.2 million, or 36%, at a fixed rate of 6.05%, to $0.4 million, due to a lower remaining principal balance. Other, Net For the fiscal 2015 full year, Other, net increased by $0.9 million due primarily to favorable exchange movements related to the Japanese yen and Singapore dollar, along with the receipt of a life insurance benefit. Income Taxes The effective tax rate for the twelve months of fiscal 2015 was 28.4%, which is significantly lower than the prior year rate of 52.2%. The full year effective rates are impacted by the non-deductibility of operating results in a certain foreign jurisdiction that is subject to a full valuation allowance. Adjusting both fiscal years for the results of this jurisdiction, the fiscal 2015 full year rate would have been 30.9% compared to 32.7% for the same period in fiscal 2014. The fiscal 2015 rate was favorably impacted by a change in the jurisdictional mix of earnings, along with favorable discrete items related to foreign earnings, and the reinstatement of the research and development credit for calendar 2015. The Company maintains valuation allowances when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances from period to period are included in the tax provision in the period of change. In determining whether a valuation allowance is required, the Company takes into account such factors as prior earnings history, expected future earnings, carry-back and carry-forward periods, and tax strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of realization of a deferred tax asset. During fiscal 2015, the Company reported operating income in certain foreign jurisdictions where the loss carryforward period is unlimited. The Company has evaluated the likelihood of whether the net deferred tax assets related to these jurisdictions would be realized and concluded that based primarily upon the uncertainty in achieving sustained levels of improvement and uncertain exchange rates in these jurisdictions, (a) it is more likely than not that $3.6 million of deferred tax assets would not be realized; and that (b) a full valuation allowance on the balance of deferred tax assets relating to these jurisdictions continues to be necessary. The Company recorded a net decrease in valuation allowance of $2.0 million in fiscal 2015 due to lower cumulative operating losses in these jurisdictions. Management believes that it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income and foreign source income to realize the remaining deferred tax assets. Order Rates As of June 30, 2015, the Company’s backlog of orders scheduled for shipment during the next six months (six-month backlog) was $34.4 million, or approximately 48% lower than the six-month backlog of $66.1 million as of June 30, 2014. Along with an unfavorable exchange impact ($2.1 million), the Company’s backlog declined through the second half of fiscal 2015 as global demand for the Company’s oil and gas related products have been adversely impacted by the decline in oil prices. Fiscal 2014 Compared to Fiscal 2013 Net Sales Net sales for fiscal 2014 decreased 7.5%, or $21.4 million, to $263.9 million from $285.3 million in fiscal 2013. Compared to fiscal 2013, on average, Asian currencies weakened against the U.S. dollar more than offsetting a strengthening euro against the U.S. dollar. The net translation effect of this on foreign operations was to decrease revenues by approximately $2.2 million versus the prior year, before eliminations. The decrease in sales was primarily the result of lower demand from the Company’s customers in North America and Europe, while sales to customers in Asia Pacific continued at record levels. Additionally, the severe winter weather throughout most of the U.S. and Canada, while difficult to quantify, impacted the performance of the supply chain causing some shipments to be delayed, and there was a general low level of order activity for both new units and spares during the cold winter months. Coming off a record year in fiscal 2013, commercial marine transmission system shipments were down in fiscal 2014. However, the Company continued to experience favorable demand trends from customers in Asia for both pressure pumping and commercial marine products as a result of overall economic growth in the region and market share gains. Towards the end of the third fiscal quarter and continuing into the fourth fiscal quarter, demand for pressure pumping transmission systems began increasing in North America, and the Company is hopeful that these recent trends will continue as the excess field inventory situation continues to improve. Sales to customers serving the global mega yacht market remained near historical lows. Sales at our manufacturing segment were down 7.3%, or $18.0 million, versus the same period last year. Compared to fiscal 2013, on average, the euro strengthened against the U.S. dollar. The net translation effect of this on foreign manufacturing operations was to increase revenues for the manufacturing segment by approximately $2.7 million versus the prior year, before eliminations. In the current fiscal year, the Company’s North American manufacturing operation, the largest, experienced a 9% decrease in sales compared to fiscal 2013. The primary drivers for this decrease were lower sales of legacy military and airport rescue and fire fighting (“ARFF”) transmission systems, and marine and propulsion systems for the global markets, only partially offset by increased shipments of aftermarket products. In the second half of fiscal 2014, the Company began to experience increased order and shipment activity for its transmission systems for the North American oil and gas market. The Company’s Italian manufacturing operations, which have been adversely impacted by the softness in the European mega yacht and 20 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTindustrial markets, experienced a sales decrease of 1.5% compared to the prior fiscal year. The Company’s Belgian manufacturing operation, which also continued to be adversely impacted by the softness in the global mega yacht market, experienced a brief strike at its facility in the first fiscal quarter. This operation saw a 12% decrease in sales versus the prior fiscal year, primarily driven by the continued softness in its markets and the temporary disruption experienced as a result of the strike in the first fiscal quarter. The Company’s Swiss manufacturing operation, which supplies customized propellers for the global mega yacht and patrol boat markets, experienced a 4% decrease in sales, primarily due to the timing of shipments for the global patrol boat and Italian mega yacht markets. Sales at our distribution segment were down 6.9%, or $9.0 million, compared to fiscal 2013. Compared to fiscal 2013, on average, the Asian currencies weakened against the U.S. dollar. The net translation effect of this on foreign distribution operations was to decrease revenues for the distribution segment by approximately $5.0 million versus the prior year, before eliminations. The Company’s distribution operation in Singapore, its largest Company-owned distribution operation, which continues to experience strong demand for marine transmission products for use in various commercial applications and pressure-pumping transmissions for the Chinese oil and gas market, experienced a less than 2% decrease in sales compared to the prior fiscal year. This operation acts as the Company’s master distributor for Asia and continues to achieve near record results as the Company’s products gain greater acceptance in the market. The Company’s distribution operation in the Northwest of the United States and Southwest of Canada experienced a decrease in sales of 4.5%. In the prior fiscal year’s first nine months, this operation experienced a 46% decrease in sales versus fiscal 2012 due to weakness in the Canadian oil and gas market as rig operators continued to adjust to the North American natural gas supply overhang and lower prices. The Canadian oil and gas market remained at depressed levels in fiscal 2014. The Company’s distribution operation in Italy, which provides boat accessories and propulsion systems for the pleasure craft market, saw sales decrease slightly due to continued weakness in the global mega yacht market. In fiscal 2013’s fourth quarter, the Company committed to a plan to exit the third party distribution agreement of this operation and entered negotiations to sell the inventory back to the parent supplier. Those negotiations were completed in the third fiscal quarter of 2014. The Company’s distribution operation in Australia, which provides boat accessories, propulsion and marine transmission systems for the pleasure craft market, saw an increase in sales of just over 12% from the prior fiscal year, driven by improved shipments in the Australian mega yacht market over the prior fiscal year. Net sales for the Company’s largest product market, marine transmission and propulsion systems, were down 9.1% compared to the prior fiscal year. The majority of the decrease was experienced in the first half of fiscal 2014 as the Company experienced decreased demand in the global commercial marine market, which experienced record shipments in the prior fiscal year, and continued weakness in the global pleasure craft market. Sales of the Company’s boat management systems manufactured at our Italian operation and servicing the global mega yacht market were up approximately 5% versus the prior fiscal year, in spite of the European mega yacht market continuing to experience softness in demand. In the off-highway transmission market, the year-over-year decrease of just over 2% can be attributed primarily to decreased legacy military and ARFF transmissions shipments, largely offset by shipments of the Company’s pressure pumping transmission systems to the Chinese oil and gas market. The decrease experienced in the Company’s industrial products of just over 14% was due to decreased sales into the agriculture, mining and general industrial markets, primarily in the North American and Italian markets, as well as decreased activity related to oil field markets. Geographically, sales to the U.S. and Canada represented 45% of consolidated sales for fiscal 2014 compared to 49% in fiscal 2013. Fiscal 2014 proved to be another milestone year for our global sales, as China continued to be our second largest end market, after the U.S, at 13% of consolidated sales in fiscal 2014, compared to 10% in fiscal 2013. Overall sales into the Asian Pacific market represented approximately 29% of sales in fiscal 2014, compared to just under 27% in fiscal 2013. See Note J of the Notes to the consolidated financial statements for more information on the Company’s business segments and foreign operations. The elimination for net intra-segment and inter-segment sales decreased $5.6 million, or 6.2%, from $90.7 million in fiscal 2013 to $85.1 million in fiscal 2014. Year-over-year changes in foreign exchange rates had a net favorable impact of $2.0 million on net intra-segment and inter-segment sales. Gross Profit In fiscal 2014, gross profit decreased $2.8 million, or 3.5%, to $77.3 million. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased 120 basis points in fiscal 2014 to 29.3%, compared to 28.1% in fiscal 2013. The table below summarizes the gross profit trend by quarter for fiscal years 2014 and 2013: Gross Profit: ($ millions) 2014 2013 % of Sales: 2014 2013 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr $20.7 $19.4 31.1% 28.2% $18.6 $22.3 29.3% 30.8% $16.5 $17.7 27.2% 25.9% $21.5 $20.6 29.2% 27.2% Year $77.3 $80.0 29.3% 28.1% 21 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDThere were a number of factors that impacted the Company’s overall gross margin rate in fiscal 2014. Gross margin for the year was unfavorably impacted by lower volumes, which was largely offset by favorable product mix, lower U.S. pension expense, lower warranty expense and favorable manufacturing absorption. The Company estimates the net unfavorable impact of lower volumes on gross margin in fiscal 2014 was approximately $9.3 million. The favorable shift in product mix related to the modest growth experienced in the Company’s oil and gas transmission business had an estimated favorable impact of $0.6 million. U.S. pension expense included in cost of goods sold decreased from $1.3 million in fiscal 2013 to $0.7 million in fiscal 2014. In addition, warranty expense decreased by $2.7 million from $4.9 million in fiscal 2013 to $2.2 in fiscal 2014 (for additional information on the Company’s warranty expense, see Note F of the Notes to the consolidated financial statements). The net remaining favorable year-over-year variance was primarily driven by favorable manufacturing absorption and product mix. Marketing, Engineering and Administrative (ME&A) Expenses Marketing, engineering, and administrative (ME&A) expenses of $67.4 million were down $0.5 million, or 0.7%, compared to the prior fiscal year. As a percentage of sales, ME&A expenses increased to 25.5% of sales versus 23.8% of sales in fiscal 2013. In the fiscal 2014 fourth quarter, the Company incurred expenses related to the investigation, severance costs and additional audit fees totaling $0.6 million associated with the previously announced discovery of accounting irregularities at its Belgian operation. The investigation was completed in the fourth fiscal quarter and did not identify any additional matters requiring adjustment to the Company’s financial statements beyond the immaterial amounts recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2014. In addition, the Company recorded a $0.6 million net unfavorable adjustment related to the cash surrender value of various employee split-dollar life insurance policies in the fourth fiscal quarter, largely due to the rollout of a policy to the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer as a result of his retirement. The Company also recorded a $0.3 million charge in the fiscal 2014 fourth quarter related to sales and use tax following the completion of a nexus study at its North American distribution operations. Adjusting for these one-time items, ME&A expenses were down year-over-year due to a continued focus on controlled spending at the Company’s North American and European operations and lower stock-based compensation expense (a decrease of $1.5 million), partially offset by increased spending in the Company’s growing Asia operations and on corporate engineering and development projects. Restructuring of Operations During fiscal 2014, the Company recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $1.0 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, representing the incremental cost above the minimum legal indemnity for a targeted workforce reduction at its Belgian operation, following finalization of negotiations with the local labor unions. The minimum legal indemnity of $0.5 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, upon announcement of the intended restructuring action. During fiscal 2014, the Company made cash payments of $0.9 million, resulting in an accrual balance at June 30, 2014 of $0.8 million. Impairment Charge In connection with preparing its financial statements for fiscal 2013, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1.4 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, which represented the remaining intangibles and fixed assets of its Italian distribution entity for which the Company committed to a plan to exit the distribution agreement and entered negotiations to sell the inventory back to the parent supplier. This decision triggered an impairment review of the long lived assets at this entity, resulting in the impairment charge of $1.4 million representing a complete impairment of the remaining intangibles ($1.3 million) and fixed assets ($0.1 million) for this entity. Interest Expense Interest expense of $0.9 million for the fiscal 2014 was down 35% versus fiscal 2013. Total interest on the Company’s $40 million revolving credit facility (“revolver”) decreased 43% to $0.3 million in fiscal 2014. The decrease can be attributed to an overall decrease in the average borrowings year-over-year. The average borrowing on the revolver, computed monthly, decreased to $13.2 million in fiscal 2014, compared to $19.8 million in the prior fiscal year. The interest rate on the revolver was a range of 1.70% to 1.84% in the prior fiscal year compared to a range of 1.80% to 1.85% in the current year. The interest expense on the Company’s $25 million Senior Note decreased $0.2 million, or 26%, at a fixed rate of 6.05%, to $0.6 million, due to a lower remaining principal balance. Other, Net For the fiscal 2014 full year, Other, net declined by $0.5 million due primarily to unfavorable exchange movements related to the euro, Japanese yen and Indian rupee. Income Taxes The effective tax rate for the twelve months of fiscal 2014 was 52.2%, which is in line with the prior year rate of 54.0%. The full year effective rates are impacted by the non-deductibility of operating losses in a certain foreign jurisdiction that is subject to a full valuation allowance. Adjusting both fiscal years for the non-deductible losses, the fiscal 2014 full year rate would have been 32.7% compared to 38.4% for the same period in fiscal 2013. The fiscal 2014 rate was favorably impacted by a change in the jurisdictional mix of earnings, along with favorable provision to return adjustments recorded in the fiscal 2014 third and fourth quarters. 22 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTThe Company maintains valuation allowances when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances from period to period are included in the tax provision in the period of change. In determining whether a valuation allowance is required, the Company takes into account such factors as prior earnings history, expected future earnings, carry-back and carry-forward periods, and tax strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of realization of a deferred tax asset. During fiscal 2014, the Company continued to incur operating losses in certain foreign jurisdictions where the loss carryforward period is unlimited. The Company has evaluated the likelihood that the net deferred tax assets related to these jurisdictions will be realized and concluded that based primarily upon continuing losses in these jurisdictions and failure to achieve targeted levels of improvement, a full valuation allowance continues to be necessary. Therefore, the Company recorded an additional valuation allowance of $1.9 million. Management believes that it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income and foreign source income to realize the remaining deferred tax assets. Order Rates As of June 30, 2014, the Company’s backlog of orders scheduled for shipment during the next six months (six-month backlog) was $66.1 million, or approximately 1% lower than the six-month backlog of $66.8 million as of June 30, 2013. In the fourth fiscal quarter, the backlog increased approximately 15% versus the end of the third fiscal quarter, as the Company continued to experience increased order activity for its pressure pumping transmission business. Liquidity and Capital Resources Fiscal Years 2015, 2014 and 2013 The net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2015 totaled $17.1 million, a decrease of $8.7 million, or approximately 33.7%, versus fiscal 2014. The reduction compared to fiscal 2014 relates to an increase in accounts receivable, a reduction in accrued retirement benefits and an increase in a life insurance receivable. These unfavorable movements were partially offset by a significant reduction in inventory. Adjusted for an $8.1 million impact of foreign currency translation, net inventory decreased by $9.3 million compared to the prior fiscal year end. The majority of this decrease was seen at the Company’s North American operations in response to the decline in demand through the second half of the fiscal year. Net inventory as a percentage of the six-month backlog increased from 148% as of June 30, 2014 to 232% as of June 30, 2015. The increase in trade receivables compared to the prior year end relates to timing of shipments within the fourth quarter, along with a slight easing of payment patterns due to economic pressures in the oil and gas market. The decrease in trade accounts payable is in line with the reduced purchase activity through the fourth quarter. The net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2014 totaled $25.7 million, an increase of $1.3 million, or approximately 5%, versus fiscal 2013. The increase was driven by a decrease in working capital, primarily inventories and accounts receivable, partially offset by lower net earnings. Adjusted for the impact of foreign currency translation, net inventory decreased by $7.1 million. From the end of the fiscal third quarter, inventory decreased $7.6 million. The majority of the net decrease in inventory came at the Company’s North American and European manufacturing operations. This decrease was driven by strong shipments to the Company’s global commercial marine transmission and Asian oil and gas markets. Net inventory as a percentage of the six-month backlog decreased from 154% as of June 30, 2013 to 148% as of June 30, 2014. The decrease in trade accounts receivable was a result of lower sales in the second half of fiscal 2014 compared to the same period in fiscal 2013, $134.3 million versus $144.2 million, respectively. The increase in trade accounts payable was due to the timing of payments, as both inventory and volume were down in the quarter compared to the prior fiscal year. The net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2013 totaled $24.5 million, an increase of $10.0 million, or approximately 70%, versus fiscal 2012. The increase was driven by a decrease in working capital, primarily accounts receivable, partially offset by lower net earnings. Adjusted for the impact of foreign currency translation, net inventory decreased by $0.2 million. From the end of the fiscal third quarter, inventory decreased approximately $10 million. The majority of the net decrease in inventory came at the Company’s North American manufacturing and Asian distribution operations. This decrease was driven by strong shipments to the Company’s global commercial marine transmission and Asian oil and gas markets. Net inventory as a percentage of the six-month backlog increased from 105% as of June 30, 2012 to 154% as of June 30, 2013. The decrease in trade accounts receivable was a result of lower sales in the second half of fiscal 2013 compared to the same period in fiscal 2012, $144.2 million versus $191.6 million, respectively. The decrease in trade accounts payable was due to a reduction in purchasing activity related to a significant decrease in inventory in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 ($10.2 million). The net cash used for investing activities in fiscal 2015 of $6.8 million consisted primarily of capital expenditures for machinery and equipment and facility upgrades at our U.S., Belgian and Singapore facilities. In fiscal 2015, the Company spent $9.0 million for capital expenditures, up from $7.2 million in fiscal 2014. The Company also received a net reimbursement of premiums paid on executive split dollar life insurance policies during the year ($1.9 million) due to resignations and retirements. The net cash used for investing activities in fiscal 2014 of $7.1 million consisted primarily of capital expenditures for machinery and equipment at our U.S. and Belgian manufacturing operations. In fiscal 2014, the Company spent $7.2 million for capital expenditures, up from $6.6 million in fiscal 2013 and down from $13.7 million in fiscal 2012. 23 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDThe net cash used for investing activities in fiscal 2013 of $6.5 million consisted primarily of capital expenditures for machinery and equipment at our U.S., Indian and Belgian manufacturing operations. In fiscal 2013, the Company spent $6.6 million for capital expenditures, down from $13.7 million and $12.0 million in fiscal years 2012 and 2011, respectively. In fiscal 2015, the net cash used by financing activities of $9.2 million consisted primarily of dividends paid to shareholders of the Company of $4.1 million and net payments of debt of $4.6 million. During fiscal 2015, the Company did not purchase any shares as part of its Board- authorized stock repurchase program. The Company has 315,000 shares remaining under its authorized stock repurchase plan. In fiscal 2014, the net cash used by financing activities of $14.9 million consisted primarily of dividends paid to shareholders of the Company of $4.1 million and net payments of debt of $8.8 million. During fiscal 2014, the Company did not purchase any shares as part of its Board- authorized stock repurchase program. The Company has 315,000 shares remaining under its authorized stock repurchase plan. In fiscal 2013, the net cash used by financing activities of $12.4 million consisted primarily of the acquisition of treasury stock of $3.1 million, under a Board-authorized stock repurchase program, dividends paid to shareholders of the Company of $4.1 million and payments of long-term debt of $4.9 million. During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company purchased 185,000 shares under this authorization, at an average price of $16.59 per share for a total cost of $3.1 million. The Company had 315,000 shares remaining under its authorized stock repurchase plan as of June 30, 2013. Future Liquidity and Capital Resources On June 30, 2014, the Company entered into a revolving loan agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the Company may, from time to time, enter into revolving credit loans in amounts not to exceed, in the aggregate, Wells Fargo’s revolving credit commitment of $60,000,000. The revolving credit commitment may be increased under the agreement by an additional $10,000,000 in the event that the conditions for “Incremental Loans” (as defined in the agreement) are satisfied. In general, outstanding revolving credit loans will bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.00%. The rate was 1.20% at June 30, 2015. In addition to principal and interest payments, the Borrowers will be responsible for paying monthly commitment fees equal to 0.15% of the unused revolving credit commitment. The Company has the option of making additional prepayments subject to certain limitations. The Credit Agreement is scheduled to expire on May 31, 2018. The outstanding balance of $10,208,000 at June 30, 2015 is classified as long-term debt. This agreement contains certain covenants, including restrictions on investments, acquisitions and indebtedness. Financial covenants include a minimum consolidated adjusted net worth, a minimum EBITDA for the most recent four fiscal quarters of $11,000,000 at June 30, 2015, and a maximum total funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.0 at June 30, 2015. On August 3, 2015, the Credit Agreement was amended to revise the definition of EBITDA for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on and including June 30, 2015 to and including March 25, 2016 to add $3,300,000, reflective of the restructuring charge taken by the Company in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015. As of June 30, 2015, the Company was in compliance with these financial covenants with a four quarter EBITDA total of $29,755,000 and a funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 0.46. The minimum adjusted net worth covenant fluctuates based upon actual earnings and the Company’s compliance with that covenant is based on the Company’s shareholders’ equity as adjusted by certain pension accounting items. As of June 30, 2015, the minimum adjusted equity requirement was $124,741,000 compared to an actual of $173,528,000 after all required adjustments. On June 30, 2014, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement (the “Prudential Agreement”). Among other things, the Prudential Agreement: (a) amends and restates the “Note Agreement” between the Company and Purchasers dated as of April 10, 2006, as it has been amended from time to time (the “2006 Note Agreement”); and (b) sets forth the terms of the potential sale and purchase of up to $50,000,000 in “Shelf Notes” as defined in the Prudential Agreement (the “Shelf Notes”) by the Company to Prudential. The notes sold by the Company to the Existing Holders under the 2006 Agreement (the “2006 Notes”) are deemed outstanding under, and are governed by, the terms of the Prudential Agreement. The 2006 Notes bear interest on the outstanding principal balance at a fixed rate of 6.05% per annum and mature on April 10, 2016. The 2006 Notes mature and become due and payable in full on April 10, 2016 (the “Payment Date”). Prior to the Payment Date, the Company is obligated to make quarterly payments of interest during the term of the 2006 Notes, plus prepayments of principal of $3,571,429 on April 10 of each year from 2010 to 2015, inclusive. The outstanding balance was $3,571,429 and $7,142,857 at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. Of the outstanding balance, $3,571,429 was classified as a current maturity of long-term debt at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. The remaining $3,571,429 was classified as long- term debt in fiscal 2014. In addition to the interest payments and any mandatory principal payments required under the terms of the Shelf Note, the Company will pay an issuance fee of 0.10% of the aggregate principal balance of each of the Shelf Notes sold to, and purchased by, Prudential. The Company may prepay the Shelf Notes or the 2006 Notes, subject to certain limitations. At no time during the term of the Prudential Agreement may the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 2006 Notes and the Shelf Notes exceed $35,000,000. The Prudential Agreement includes financial covenants regarding minimum net worth, minimum EBITDA for the most recent four (4) fiscal quarters of $11,000,000 and a maximum total funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.0. On August 3, 2015, the Prudential Agreement was amended to revise the definition of EBITDA for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on and including June 30, 2015 to and including March 25, 2016 to add $3,300,000, reflective of the restructuring charge taken by the Company in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015. As of June 30, 2015, the Company was in compliance with these financial covenants. In addition, the Company will be required to make an offer to purchase the 2006 Notes and Shelf Notes upon a Change of Control, and any such offer must include the payment of a Yield-Maintenance 24 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTAmount. The Prudential Agreement also includes certain covenants that limit, among other things, certain indebtedness, acquisitions and investments. The Prudential Agreement also has a most favored lender provision whereby the Prudential Agreement shall be automatically modified to include any additional covenant or event of default that is included in any agreement evidencing, securing, guarantying or otherwise related to other indebtedness in excess of $1,000,000. Four quarter EBITDA, total funded debt, and adjusted net worth are non-GAAP measures, and are included herein for the purpose of disclosing the status of the Company’s compliance with the four quarter EBITDA, total funded debt to four quarter EBITDA ratio, and adjusted net worth covenants described above. In accordance with the Company’s revolving loan agreements and the Prudential Agreement: ¨ “Four quarter EBITDA” is defined as “the sum of (i) Net Income plus, to the extent deducted in the calculation of Net Income, (ii) interest expense, (iii) depreciation and amortization expense, (iv) income tax expense, and (v) $3,300,000 adjustment;” and ¨ “Total funded debt” is defined as “(i) all Indebtedness for borrowed money (including without limitation, Indebtedness evidenced by promissory notes, bonds, debentures and similar interest-bearing instruments), plus (ii) all purchase money Indebtedness, plus (iii) the principal portion of capital lease obligations, plus (iv) the maximum amount which is available to be drawn under letters of credit then outstanding, all as determined for the Company and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of the date of determination, without duplication, and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis.” ¨ “Total funded debt to four quarter EBITDA” is defined as the ratio of total funded debt to four quarter EBITDA calculated in accordance with the above definitions. ¨ “Adjusted net worth” means the Company’s reported shareholder equity, excluding adjustments that result from (i) changes to the assumptions used by the Company in determining its pension liabilities or (ii) changes in the market value of plan assets up to an aggregate amount of adjustments equal to $34,000,000 (“Permitted Benefit Plan Adjustments”) for purposes of computing net worth at any time. The Company’s total funded debt as of June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 was equal to the total debt reported on the Company’s June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 Consolidated Balance Sheet, and therefore no reconciliation is included herein. The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the Company’s reported Net Earnings to the calculation of four quarter EBITDA for the four quarters ended June 30, 2015: Four Quarter EBITDA Reconciliation Net Earnings Attributable to Twin Disc Depreciation & Amortization Restructuring adjustment Interest Expense Income Taxes Four Quarter EBITDA Total Funded Debt to Four Quarter EBITDA Total Funded Debt Divided by: Four Quarter EBITDA Total Funded Debt to Four Quarter EBITDA $ 11,173,000 10,161,000 3,300,000 606,000 4,515,000 $ 29,755,000 $ 13,802,000 29,755,000 0.46 The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the Company’s reported shareholders’ equity to the calculation of adjusted net worth for the quarter ended June 30, 2015: Total Twin Disc Shareholders’ Equity Permitted Benefit Plan Adjustments Adjusted Net Worth $139,528,000 34,000,000 $173,528,000 As of June 30, 2015, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants described above. As of June 30, 2015, the Company’s backlog of orders scheduled for shipment during the next six months (six-month backlog) was $34.4 million, or approximately 48% lower than the six-month backlog of $66.1 million as of June 30, 2014. The recent decrease in order backlog has been driven primarily by the slowdown in the global oil and gas market. The Company does not expect to violate any of its financial covenants in fiscal 2016. Based on its annual financial plan, the Company believes it is well positioned to generate sufficient EBITDA levels throughout fiscal 2016 in order to maintain compliance with the above covenants. However, as with all forward-looking information, there can be no assurance that the Company will achieve the planned results in future periods due to the uncertainties in certain of its markets. Please see the factors discussed under Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Form 10-K for further discussion of this topic. 25 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDThe Company’s balance sheet remains very strong, there are no off-balance-sheet arrangements other than the operating leases listed below, and we continue to have sufficient liquidity for near-term needs. The Company had $49.8 million of available borrowings on our $60 million revolving loan agreement as of June 30, 2015. The Company expects to continue to generate enough cash from operations to meet our operating and investing needs. As of June 30, 2015, the Company also had cash of $22.9 million, primarily at its overseas operations. These funds, with some restrictions and tax implications, are available for repatriation as deemed necessary by the Company. In fiscal 2016, the Company expects to contribute $2.2 million to its defined benefit pension plans, the minimum contributions required. However, if the Company elects to make voluntary contributions in fiscal 2016, it intends to do so using cash from operations and, if necessary, from available borrowings under existing credit facilities. Net working capital decreased $10.3 million, or approximately 8%, in fiscal 2015, and the current ratio decreased from 3.2 at June 30, 2014 to 3.0 at June 30, 2015. The decrease in net working capital was primarily driven by a decrease in inventories in fiscal 2015, partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable and a decrease in accounts payable. The decrease in accounts payable is a function of reduced purchasing activity driven by reduced demand, while the increase to accounts receivable was the result of timing of shipments and a slowdown in payment patterns from certain customers impacted by delays in oil and gas related projects. The Company expects capital expenditures to be approximately $11 million in fiscal 2016. These anticipated expenditures reflect the Company’s plans to continue investing in modern equipment and facilities, its global sourcing program and new products as well as expanding capacity at facilities around the world. Management believes that available cash, the credit facility, cash generated from future operations, existing lines of credit and potential access to debt markets will be adequate to fund the Company’s capital requirements for the foreseeable future. Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations The Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements, other than operating leases, as of June 30, 2015 and 2014. The Company has obligations under non-cancelable operating lease contracts and loan and senior note agreements for certain future payments. A summary of those commitments follows (in thousands): Contractual Obligations Revolving loan borrowing Long-term debt, including current maturities Operating leases Total Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years After 5 Years $10,208 $ 3,594 $ 8,082 $ – $3,571 $2,955 $10,208 $ – $ 4,478 $ – $ – $638 $ – $23 $11 The table above does not include accrued interest of approximately $104,000 related to the revolving loan borrowing. The table above also does not include tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits totaling $810,000, excluding related interest and penalties, as the timing of their resolution cannot be estimated. See Note N of the Notes to the consolidated financial statements for disclosures surrounding uncertain income tax positions. The Company maintains defined benefit pension plans for some of its operations in the United States and Europe. The Company has established the Pension Committee of the Board of Directors to oversee the operations and administration of the defined benefit plans. The Company estimates that fiscal 2016 contributions to all defined benefit plans will total $2,240,000. Other Matters Critical Accounting Policies The preparation of this Annual Report requires management’s judgment to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates. The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note A to the consolidated financial statements. Not all of these significant accounting policies require management to make difficult, subjective, or complex judgments or estimates. However, the policies management considers most critical to understanding and evaluating our reported financial results are the following: Accounts Receivable The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and adjusts credit limits based on payment history and the customer’s credit-worthiness as determined by review of current credit information. We continuously monitor collections and payments from our customers and maintain a provision for estimated credit losses based upon our historical experience and any specific customer-collection issues. In addition, senior management reviews the accounts receivable aging on a monthly basis to determine if any receivable balances may be 26 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTuncollectible. Although our accounts receivable are dispersed among a large customer base, a significant change in the liquidity or financial position of any one of our largest customers could have a material adverse impact on the collectibility of our accounts receivable and future operating results. Inventory Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost has been determined by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for the majority of the inventories located in the United States, and by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method for all other inventories. Management specifically identifies obsolete products and analyzes historical usage, forecasted production based on future orders, demand forecasts, and economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. The adjustments to the reserve are estimates that could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from the actual requirements if future economic conditions, customer demand or competitive conditions differ from expectations. Goodwill In conformity with U.S. GAAP, goodwill is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an impairment might exist. The Company performs impairment reviews for its four reporting units using a fair-value method based on management’s judgments and assumptions or third party valuations. The Company is subject to financial statement risk to the extent the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. Based upon the goodwill impairment review completed at the end of fiscal 2015, it was determined that the fair value for each of the reporting units exceeded the carrying value and therefore goodwill was not impaired. In determining the fair value of our reporting units, management is required to make estimates of future operating results, including growth rates, and a weighted-average cost of capital that reflects current market conditions, among others. Our development of future operating results incorporates management’s best estimates of current and future economic and market conditions which are derived from a review of past results, current results and approved business plans. Many of the factors used in assessing fair value are outside the control of management, and these assumptions and estimates can change in future periods. While the Company believes its judgments and assumptions were reasonable, different assumptions, economic factors and/or market indicators could materially change the estimated fair values of the Company’s reporting units and, therefore, impairment charges could be required in the future. The following are key assumptions to our discounted cash flow model: Business Projections – We make assumptions about the level of sales for each fiscal year including expected growth, if any. This assumption drives our planning for volumes, mix, and pricing. We also make assumptions about our cost levels (e.g., capacity utilization, cost performance, etc.). These assumptions are key inputs for developing our cash flow projections. These projections are derived using our internal business plans that are reviewed annually during the annual budget process. Discount Rates – When measuring a possible impairment, future cash flows are discounted at a rate that is consistent with a weighted average cost of capital for a potential market participant. The weighted average cost of capital is an estimate of the overall after-tax rate of return required by equity and debt holders of a business enterprise. There are a number of assumptions that management makes when calculating the appropriate discount rate, including the targeted leverage ratio. Long Lived Assets The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. For property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets, excluding indefinite-lived intangible assets, the Company performs undiscounted operating cash flow analyses to determine if an impairment exists. If an impairment is determined to exist, any related impairment loss is calculated based on fair value. Fair value is primarily determined using discounted cash flow analyses; however, other methods may be used to substantiate the discounted cash flow analyses, including third party valuations when necessary. Warranty The Company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of its suppliers. However, its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, the extent of the market affected by the failure and the expense involved in satisfactorily addressing the situation. The warranty reserve is established based on our best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. When evaluating the adequacy of the reserve for warranty costs, management takes into consideration the term of the warranty coverage, historical claim rates and costs of repair, knowledge of the type and volume of new products and economic trends. While we believe the warranty reserve is adequate and that the judgment applied is appropriate, such amounts estimated to be due and payable in the future could differ materially from what actually transpires. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans The Company provides a wide range of benefits to employees and retired employees, including pensions and postretirement health care coverage. Plan assets and obligations are recorded annually based on the Company’s measurement date utilizing various actuarial assumptions 27 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDsuch as discount rates, expected return on plan assets, compensation increases, retirement and mortality tables, and health care cost trend rates as of that date. The approach used to determine the annual assumptions are as follows: ¨ Discount Rate – based on the Towers Watson BOND:Link model at June 30, 2015 as applied to the expected payouts from the pension plans. This yield curve is made up of Corporate Bonds rated AA or better. ¨ Expected Return on Plan Assets – based on the expected long-term average rate of return on assets in the pension funds, which is reflective of the current and projected asset mix of the funds and considers historical returns earned on the funds. ¨ Compensation Increase – reflect the long-term actual experience, the near-term outlook and assumed inflation. ¨ Retirement and Mortality Rates – based upon the IRS Generational Mortality Table for Annuitants and Non-Annuitants for fiscal 2013, 2014 and 2015. ¨ Health Care Cost Trend Rates – developed based upon historical cost data, near-term outlook and an assessment of likely long-term trends. Measurements of net periodic benefit cost are based on the assumptions used for the previous year-end measurements of assets and obligations. The Company reviews its actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and makes modifications to the assumptions when appropriate. As required by U.S. GAAP, the effects of the modifications are recorded currently or amortized over future periods. Based on information provided by its independent actuaries and other relevant sources, the Company believes that the assumptions used are reasonable; however, changes in these assumptions could impact the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Income Taxes Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The Company maintains valuation allowances when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In determining whether a valuation allowance is required, the Company takes into account such factors as prior earnings history, expected future earnings, carry-back and carry-forward periods, and tax strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of realization of a deferred tax asset. During fiscal 2015, the Company reported operating income in certain foreign jurisdictions where the loss carryforward period is unlimited. The Company has evaluated the likelihood of whether the net deferred tax assets related to these jurisdictions would be realized and concluded that based primarily upon the uncertainty to achieve levels of sustained improvement and uncertain exchange rates in these jurisdictions, (a) it is more likely than not that $3.6 million of deferred tax assets would not be realized; and that (b) a full valuation allowance on the balance of deferred tax assets relating to these jurisdictions continues to be necessary. The Company recorded a net decrease in this valuation allowance of $2.0 million in fiscal 2015 due to lower cumulative operating losses in these jurisdictions. Management believes that it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income and foreign source income to realize the remaining deferred tax assets. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance intended to amend current presentation guidance by requiring that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The amendments in this guidance are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 (the Company’s fiscal 2017). The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures. In August 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern. The amendments in this guidance are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2016 (the Company’s fiscal 2017), and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial disclosures. In June 2014, the FASB issued stock compensation guidance requiring that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The amendments in this guidance are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 (the Company’s fiscal 2017). The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures. In May 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance on revenue from contracts with customers. This revenue recognition guidance supersedes existing U.S.GAAP guidance, including most industry-specific guidance. The core principle is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance identifies steps to apply in achieving this principle. This updated guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017 (the Company’s fiscal 2019). The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures. 28 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTIn April 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance on the reporting for discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. The new guidance also requires expanded financial disclosures about discontinued operations. The amendments in this updated guidance are effective for the first quarter of the Company’s fiscal 2016. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures. In July 2013, the FASB issued guidance stating that, except in certain defined circumstances, an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2013 (the Company’s fiscal 2015). The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures. In March 2013, the FASB issued guidance on the parent company’s accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment upon derecognition of certain subsidiaries or groups of assets within a foreign entity or of an investment in a foreign entity. This guidance clarifies the circumstances under which the related cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2013 (the Company’s fiscal 2015). The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. Item 7(a). Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk The Company is exposed to market risks from changes in interest rates, commodities and foreign currency exchange rates. To reduce such risks, the Company selectively uses financial instruments and other proactive management techniques. All hedging transactions are authorized and executed pursuant to clearly defined policies and procedures, which prohibit the use of financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Discussion of the Company’s accounting policies and further disclosure relating to financial instruments is included in Note A to the consolidated financial statements. Interest rate risk - The Company’s earnings exposure related to adverse movements of interest rates is primarily derived from outstanding floating rate debt instruments that are indexed to the LIBOR interest rate. The Company currently has a $60 million revolving loan agreement, which is due to expire on May 31, 2018. In accordance with the loan agreement as amended, the Company borrows at LIBOR plus an additional “Add-On” of 1.0%. Due to the relative stability of interest rates, the Company did not utilize any financial instruments at June 30, 2015 to manage interest rate risk exposure. A 10 percent increase or decrease in the applicable interest rate would result in a change in pretax interest expense of approximately $12,000. Commodity price risk - The Company is exposed to fluctuation in market prices for such commodities as steel and aluminum. The Company does not utilize commodity price hedges to manage commodity price risk exposure. Direct material cost as a percent of total cost of goods sold was 53.8% for fiscal 2015. Currency risk - The Company has exposure to foreign currency exchange fluctuations. Approximately 22 percent of the Company’s revenues in the year ended June 30, 2015 were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Of that total, approximately 61 percent was denominated in euros with the balance comprised of Japanese yen, Indian rupee, Swiss franc and the Australian and Singapore dollars. The Company does not hedge the translation exposure represented by the net assets of its foreign subsidiaries. Foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded as a component of shareholders’ equity. Forward foreign exchange contracts are used to hedge the currency fluctuations on significant transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Derivative financial instruments - The Company has written policies and procedures that place all financial instruments under the direction of the Company corporate treasury department and restrict derivative transactions to those intended for hedging purposes. The use of financial instruments for trading purposes is prohibited. The Company uses financial instruments to manage the market risk from changes in foreign exchange rates. Periodically, the Company enters into forward exchange contracts to reduce the earnings and cash flow impact of non-functional currency denominated receivables and payables. These contracts are highly effective in hedging the cash flows attributable to changes in currency exchange rates. Gains and losses resulting from these contracts offset the foreign exchange gains or losses on the underlying assets and liabilities being hedged. The maturities of the forward exchange contracts generally coincide with the settlement dates of the related transactions. Gains and losses on these contracts are recorded in Other Income (Expense), net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income as the changes in the fair value of the contracts are recognized and generally offset the gains and losses on the hedged items in the same period. The primary currency to which the Company was exposed in fiscal 2015 and 2014 was the euro. At June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had no outstanding forward exchange contracts. 29 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data See Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule. Sales and Earnings by Quarter - Unaudited (in thousands, except per share amounts) 2015 Net sales Gross profit Net earnings attributable to Twin Disc Basic earnings per share attributable to Twin Disc common shareholders Diluted earnings per share attributable to Twin Disc common shareholders Dividends per share 2014 Net sales Gross profit Net earnings (loss) attributable to Twin Disc Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Twin Disc common shareholders Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Twin Disc common shareholders Dividends per share 1st Qtr. $64,824 22,389 4,043 0.36 0.36 0.09 1st Qtr. $66,426 20,667 1,277 0.11 0.11 0.09 2nd Qtr. $72,691 22,103 3,747 0.33 0.33 0.09 2nd Qtr. $63,212 18,544 518 0.05 0.05 0.09 3rd Qtr. $60,941 19,006 2,946 0.26 0.26 0.09 3rd Qtr. $60,705 16,528 (475) 4th Qtr. $67,334 19,534 437 0.04 0.04 0.09 4th Qtr. $73,566 21,515 2,324 Year $265,790 83,032 11,173 0.99 0.99 0.36 Year $263,909 77,254 3,644 (0.04) 0.20 0.32 (0.04) 0.09 0.20 0.09 0.32 0.36 Item 9. Change in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. Item 9(a). Controls and Procedures Conclusion Regarding Disclosure Controls and Procedures As required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this report and under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. Based on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: 1. pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company, 2. provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company, and 30 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORT3. provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures included in such controls may deteriorate. The Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based upon the framework (2013 edition) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based upon such evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2015. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2015, as stated in their report which appears herein. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, there have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Item 9(b). Other Information Not applicable. PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant For information with respect to the executive officers of the Registrant, see “Executive Officers of the Registrant” at the end of Part I of this report. For information with respect to the Directors of the Registrant, see “Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held October 23, 2015, which is incorporated into this report by reference. For information with respect to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, see “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held October 23, 2015, which is incorporated into this report by reference. For information with respect to the Company’s Code of Ethics, see “Guidelines for Business Conduct and Ethics” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held October 23, 2015, which is incorporated into this report by reference. The Company’s Code of Ethics, entitled, “Guidelines for Business Conduct and Ethics,” is included on the Company’s website, www.twindisc.com. If the Company makes any substantive amendment to the Code of Ethics, or grants a waiver from a provision of the Code of Ethics for its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer or Controller (or any person performing similar functions), it intends to disclose the nature of such amendment on its website within four business days of the amendment or waiver in lieu of filing a Form 8-K with the SEC. For information with respect to procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Company’s Board of Directors, see “Director Committee Functions: Nominating and Governance Committee” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held October 23, 2015, which is incorporated into this report by reference. There were no changes to these procedures since the Company’s last disclosure relating to these procedures. For information with respect to the Audit Committee Financial Expert, see “Director Committee Functions: Audit Committee” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held October 23, 2015, which is incorporated into this report by reference. For information with respect to the Audit Committee Disclosure, see “Director Committee Functions: Audit Committee” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held October 23, 2015, which is incorporated into this report by reference. For information with respect to the Audit Committee Membership, see “Director Committee Functions: Committee Membership” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held October 23, 2015, which is incorporated into this report by reference. 31 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDItem 11. Executive Compensation The information set forth under the captions “Executive Compensation,” “Director Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” and “Compensation and Executive Development Committee Report,” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on October 23, 2015, is incorporated into this report by reference. Discussion in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Compensation and Executive Development Committee Report” is incorporated by reference but shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” as part of this report. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is set forth in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on October 23, 2015 under the captions “Principal Shareholders” and “Directors and Executive Officers” and incorporated into this report by reference. For information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans of the Company, see “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on October 23, 2015, which incorporated into this report by reference. There are no arrangements known to the Registrant, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Registrant. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, Director Independence For information with respect to transactions with related persons and policies for the review, approval or ratification of such transactions, see “Corporate Governance – Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held October 23, 2015, which is incorporated into this report by reference. For information with respect to director independence, see “Corporate Governance – Board Independence” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held October 23, 2015, which is incorporated into this report by reference. Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services The Company incorporates by reference the information contained in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held October 23, 2015 under the heading “Fees to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.” PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules (a)(1) Consolidated Financial Statements See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule,” the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and the Consolidated Financial Statements, all of which are incorporated by reference. (a)(2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule,” and the Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule, all of which are incorporated by reference. (a)(3) Exhibits. See Exhibit Index included as the last page of this form, which is incorporated by reference. 32 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTIndex To Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule Index To Consolidated Financial Statements Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Index To Financial Statement Schedule Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Page 34 35 36 37 38 39-61 61 Schedules, other than those listed, are omitted for the reason that they are inapplicable, are not required, or the information required is shown in the financial statements or the related notes. 33 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Twin Disc, Incorporated: In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Twin Disc, Incorporated and its subsidiaries at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9(a). Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Milwaukee, Wisconsin September 14, 2015 34 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTTwin Disc, Incorporated and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets June 30, 2015 and 2014 (In thousands, except share amounts) ASSETS Current assets: Cash Trade accounts receivable, net Inventories Deferred income taxes Other Total current assets Property, plant and equipment, net Goodwill, net Deferred income taxes Intangible assets, net Other assets LIABILITIES and EQUITY Current liabilities: 2015 2014 $ 22,936 $ 24,757 43,883 80,241 4,863 17,907 169,830 56,427 12,789 4,878 2,186 3,752 40,219 97,579 4,779 12,763 180,097 60,267 13,463 2,556 2,797 7,805 $249,862 $266,985 Short-term borrowings and current maturities of long-term debt $ 3,571 $ 3,604 Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Total current liabilities Long-term debt Accrued retirement benefits Deferred income taxes Other long-term liabilities Twin Disc shareholders’ equity: Preferred shares authorized: 200,000; issued: none; no par value Common shares authorized: 30,000,000; issued: 13,099,468; no par value Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive loss Less treasury stock, at cost (1,832,121 and 1,837,595 shares, respectively) Total Twin Disc shareholders’ equity Noncontrolling interest Total equity The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. 20,729 32,754 57,054 10,231 38,362 1,093 2,955 22,111 31,265 56,980 14,800 37,006 1,778 4,110 109,695 114,674 - 12,259 190,807 (35,481) 167,585 28,057 139,528 639 140,167 $249,862 - 11,973 183,695 (15,943) 179,725 28,141 151,584 727 152,311 $266,985 35 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDTwin Disc, Incorporated and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (In thousands, except share amounts) Net sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit Marketing, engineering and administrative expenses Restructuring of operations Impairment charge Earnings from operations Other income (expense): Interest income Interest expense Other, net Earnings before income taxes and noncontrolling interest Income taxes Net earnings Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest 2015 $265,790 182,758 83,032 64,264 3,282 - 15,486 124 (606) 896 414 15,900 4,515 11,385 (212) 2014 $263,909 186,655 77,254 67,406 961 - 8,887 121 (936) 24 (791) 8,096 4,226 3,870 (226) 2013 $285,282 205,257 80,025 67,899 708 1,405 10,013 102 (1,435) 557 (776) 9,237 4,986 4,251 (369) Net earnings attributable to Twin Disc $ 11,173 $ 3,644 $ 3,882 Earnings per share data: Basic earnings per share attributable to Twin Disc common shareholders Diluted earnings per share attributable to Twin Disc common shareholders $ 0.99 0.99 $ 0.32 0.32 $ 0.34 0.34 Weighted average shares outstanding data: Basic shares outstanding Dilutive stock awards Diluted shares outstanding Comprehensive (loss) income: Net earnings Foreign currency translation adjustment Benefit plan adjustments, net of income taxes of $(2,974), $3,806 and $4,163, respectively Comprehensive (loss) income Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest 11,273 4 11,277 11,258 6 11,264 11,304 73 11,377 $ 11,385 (14,119) $ 3,870 3,760 $ 4,251 447 (5,499) (8,233) (132) 6,126 13,756 (156) 8,322 13,020 (240) Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Twin Disc $ (8,365) $ 13,600 $ 12,780 The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. 36 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTTwin Disc, Incorporated and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (In thousands) Cash flows from operating activities: Net earnings Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: 2015 2014 2013 $11,385 $ 3,870 $ 4,251 Depreciation and amortization Loss on sale of plant assets Impairment charge Stock compensation expense Restructuring of operations Provision for deferred income taxes Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Trade accounts receivable Inventories Other assets Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Accrued/prepaid retirement benefits Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from sale of plant assets Capital expenditures Other, net Net cash used by investing activities Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from senior notes Payments of senior notes Borrowings under revolving loan agreement Repayments under revolving loan agreement Proceeds from exercise of stock options Acquisition of treasury stock Dividends paid to shareholders Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest Excess tax benefits from stock compensation Payments of withholding taxes on stock compensation Net cash used by financing activities Effect of exchange rate changes on cash Net change in cash Cash: Beginning of year End of year Supplemental cash flow information: Cash paid during the year for: Interest Income taxes The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. 10,161 215 – 696 3,282 (442) (7,248) 8,860 (4,090) 914 380 (7,053) 17,060 279 (9,049) 1,934 (6,836) – (3,600) 83,681 (84,674) 15 – (4,061) (220) (26) (313) (9,198) (2,847) (1,821) 24,757 $22,936 10,657 26 – 1,184 961 634 7,076 6,972 2,198 1,364 (8,531) (662) 25,749 103 (7,245) 34 (7,108) – (3,651) 70,443 (75,544) – – (4,059) (487) 524 (2,169) (14,943) 335 4,033 10,838 287 1,405 2,681 708 687 17,636 176 (3,136) (2,457) (4,969) (3,631) 24,476 315 (6,582) (231) (6,498) 32 (96) 83,450 (88,382) 189 (3,069) (4,078) (204) 1,451 (1,700) (12,407) (548) 5,023 20,724 $24,757 15,701 $20,724 $ 569 5,061 $ 989 3,691 $ 1,536 2,545 37 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDTwin Disc, Incorporated and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (In thousands) Twin Disc, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity Common Stock Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Treasury Stock Non- Controlling Interest Total Equity Balance at June 30, 2012 $12,759 $184,306 $(34,797) $(26,781) $1,022 $136,509 Net earnings Translation adjustments Benefit plan adjustments, net of tax Cash dividends 3,882 (4,078) 576 8,322 Compensation expense and windfall tax benefits Shares (acquired) issued, net 2,894 (2,470) (2,109) 369 (129) (204) 4,251 447 8,322 (4,282) 2,894 (4,579) Balance at June 30, 2013 13,183 184,110 (25,899) (28,890) 1,058 143,562 Net earnings Translation adjustments Benefit plan adjustments, net of tax Cash dividends 3,644 (4,059) 3,830 6,126 Compensation expense and windfall tax benefits Shares (acquired) issued, net 1,708 (2,918) 749 Balance at June 30, 2014 11,973 183,695 (15,943) (28,141) Net earnings Translation adjustments Benefit plan adjustments, net of tax Cash dividends 11,173 (4,061) (14,039) (5,499) Compensation expense and windfall tax benefits Shares (acquired) issued, net 668 (382) 84 226 (70) (487) 727 212 (80) (220) 3,870 3,760 6,126 (4,546) 1,708 (2,169) 152,311 11,385 (14,119) (5,499) (4,281) 668 (298) Balance at June 30, 2015 $12,259 $190,807 $(35,481) $(28,057) $ 639 $140,167 The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. 38 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTTwin Disc, Incorporated and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements A. Significant Accounting Policies The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of these financial statements: Consolidation Principles –— The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Twin Disc, Incorporated and its wholly and partially owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries. Certain foreign subsidiaries are included based on fiscal years ending May 31, to facilitate prompt reporting of consolidated accounts. The Company also has a controlling interest in a Japanese joint venture, which is consolidated based upon a fiscal year ending March 31. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Translation of Foreign Currencies –— The financial statements of the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated using the current exchange rate for assets and liabilities and the weighted-average exchange rate for the year for revenues and expenses. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, which is included in equity. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are included in earnings. Included in other income (expense) are foreign currency transaction gains of $491,000, $293,000 and $642,000 in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Cash –— The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalent. Under the Company’s cash management system, cash balances at certain banks are funded when checks are presented for payment. To the extent that checks issued, but not yet presented for payment, exceed the balance on hand at the specific bank against which they were written, the amount of those un-presented checks is included in accounts payable. Receivables –— Trade accounts receivable are stated net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,183,000 and $3,637,000 at June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts provision for certain customers where a risk of default has been specifically identified as well as provisions determined on a general basis when it is believed that some default is probable and estimable. The assessment of likelihood of customer default is based on a variety of factors, including the length of time the receivables are past due, the historical collection experience and existing economic conditions. Various factors may adversely impact our customer’s ability to access sufficient liquidity and capital to fund their operations and render the Company’s estimation of customer defaults inherently uncertain. While the Company believes current allowances for doubtful accounts are adequate, it is possible that these factors may cause higher levels of customer defaults and bad debt expense in future periods. Fair Value of Financial Instruments –— The carrying amount reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable and short term borrowings approximate fair value because of the immediate short-term maturity of these financial instruments. If measured at fair value, cash would be classified as Level 1 and all other items listed above would be classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy, as described in Note M. The fair value of the Company’s 6.05% Senior Notes due April 10, 2016 was approximately $3,726,000 and $7,605,000 at June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The fair value of the Senior Notes is estimated by discounting the future cash flows at rates offered to the Company for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities. This rate was represented by the U.S. Treasury Three-Year Yield Curve Rate (1.01% and 0.88% for fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively), plus the current add-on related to the Company’s revolving loan agreement (1.00% for both fiscal 2015 and 2014) resulting in a total rate of 2.01% and 1.88% for fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. See Note G, “Debt” for the related book value of this debt instrument. The Company’s revolving loan agreement approximates fair value at June 30, 2015. If measured at fair value in the financial statements, long-term debt (including the current portion) would be classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy, as described in Note M. Derivative Financial Instruments –— The Company has written policies and procedures that place all financial instruments under the direction of the Company’s corporate treasury and restricts all derivative transactions to those intended for hedging purposes. The use of financial instruments for trading purposes is prohibited. The Company uses financial instruments to manage the market risk from changes in foreign exchange rates. Periodically, the Company enters into forward exchange contracts to reduce the earnings and cash flow impact of non-functional currency denominated receivables and payables. These contracts are highly effective in hedging the cash flows attributable to changes in currency exchange rates. Gains and losses resulting from these contracts offset the foreign exchange gains or losses on the underlying assets and liabilities being hedged. The maturities of the forward exchange contracts generally coincide with the settlement dates of the related transactions. Gains and losses on these contracts are recorded in other income (expense) as the changes in the fair value of the contracts are recognized and generally offset the gains and losses on the hedged items in the same period. The primary currency to which the Company was exposed in fiscal 2015 and 2014 was the euro. At June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had no outstanding forward exchange contracts. 39 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDInventories –— Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost has been determined by the last in, first out (LIFO) method for the majority of inventories located in the United States, and by the first in, first out (FIFO) method for all other inventories. Management specifically identifies obsolete products and analyzes historical usage, forecasted production based on future orders, demand forecasts, and economic trends, among others, when evaluating the adequacy of the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. Property, Plant and Equipment and Depreciation –— Assets are stated at cost. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are charged against earnings as incurred. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments are capitalized and depreciated. Depreciation is provided on the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The lives assigned to buildings and related improvements range from 10 to 40 years, and the lives assigned to machinery and equipment range from 5 to 15 years. Upon disposal of property, plant and equipment, the cost of the asset and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in earnings. Fully depreciated assets are not removed from the accounts until physically disposed. Impairment of Long-lived Assets –— The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. For property, plant and equipment and other long- lived assets, excluding indefinite-lived intangible assets, the Company performs undiscounted operating cash flow analyses to determine if an impairment exists. If an impairment is determined to exist, any related impairment loss is calculated based on fair value. Fair value is primarily determined using discounted cash flow analyses; however, other methods may be used to determine the fair value, including third party valuations when necessary. Revenue Recognition –— Revenue is recognized by the Company when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred and ownership has transferred to the customer; the price to the customer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized at the time product is shipped to the customer, except for certain domestic shipments to overseas customers where revenue is recognized upon receipt by the customer. A significant portion of our consolidated net sales is transacted through a third party distribution network. Sales to third party distributors are subject to the revenue recognition criteria described above. Goods sold to third party distributors are subject to an annual return policy, for which a provision is made at the time of shipment based upon historical experience. Goodwill and Other Intangibles –— Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, primarily trade names, are tested for impairment at least annually on the last day of the Company’s fiscal year and more frequently if an event occurs which indicates the asset may be impaired. If applicable, goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets not subject to amortization have been assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing based upon the relative fair value of the asset to each reporting unit. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include, among others: a significant decline in expected future cash flows; a sustained, significant decline in the Company’s stock price and market capitalization; a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate; unanticipated competition; the testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit; and slower growth rates. Any adverse change in these factors could have a significant impact on the recoverability of these assets and could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Impairment of goodwill is measured according to a two step approach. In the first step, the fair value of a reporting unit, as defined, is compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit, including goodwill. The fair value is primarily determined using discounted cash flow analyses; however, other methods may be used to determine the fair value, including third party valuations. For purposes of the June 30, 2015 impairment analysis, the Company has utilized discounted cash flow analyses. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. In the second step, the implied value of the goodwill is estimated as the fair value of the reporting unit less the fair value of all other tangible and identifiable intangible assets of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess, not to exceed the carrying amount of the goodwill. Based upon the goodwill impairment review completed in conjunction with the preparation of the annual financial statements at the end of fiscal 2015, which incorporates management’s best estimates of economic and market conditions over the projected period and a weighted- average cost of capital that reflects current market conditions, it was determined that the fair value of goodwill for each of the reporting units exceeded the carrying value and therefore goodwill was not impaired. The fair value of the Company’s other intangible assets with indefinite lives, primarily trade names, is estimated using the relief-from-royalty method, which requires assumptions related to projected revenues; assumed royalty rates that could be payable if the Company did not own the asset; and a discount rate. The Company completed the impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangibles as of June 30, 2015 and concluded there were no impairments. Changes in circumstances, existing at the measurement date or at other times in the future, or in the numerous estimates associated with management’s judgments, assumptions and estimates made in assessing the fair value of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles, 40 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTcould result in an impairment charge in the future. The Company will continue to monitor all significant estimates and impairment indicators, and will perform interim impairment reviews as necessary. Any cost incurred to extend or renew the term of an indefinite lived intangible asset are expensed as incurred. Deferred Taxes –— The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future income tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which temporary differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided for deferred tax assets where it is considered more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefit of such assets. Management Estimates –— The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates. Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs –— The Company records revenue from shipping and handling costs in net sales. The cost associated with shipping and handling of products is reflected in cost of goods sold. Out-of-Period Adjustments –— During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company recorded out-of-period adjustments related to the correction of errors identified late in the year-end closing process of fiscal 2013 that were deemed immaterial for adjustment to the fiscal 2013 financial statements. The impact of these corrections to the fiscal 2014 first quarter and full year results was to increase earnings before income taxes and noncontrolling interest by $437,000 and increase net earnings attributable to Twin Disc by $69,000 (after considering applicable tax effects). The nature of these errors is as follows: ¨ The Company had over accrued for certain payroll related items totaling $337,000 as of June 30, 2013, resulting in an increase to earnings from operations. ¨ The Company had overstated its warranty accrual by $217,000 as of June 30, 2013, resulting in an increase to earnings from operations. ¨ The Company determined that work-in-process inventory had been overstated by $117,000 as of June 30, 2013. As a result, additional cost of goods sold was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2014, resulting in a decrease to earnings from operations. ¨ The Company’s deferred tax liabilities were understated by $285,000 as of June 30, 2013, resulting in additional tax expense. The Company does not believe these errors were material to its financial statements for any prior period, nor that the correction of these errors was material to the year ended June 30 2014. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company recorded an out-of-period adjustment for the correction of an error related to tax expense. More specifically, the Company understated tax expense by $175,000 for the year ended June 30, 2014. The impact of the correction of this error was to decrease net earnings by $175,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. The Company does not believe this error is material to its financial statements for any prior period, nor that the correction of these errors was material to the year ended June 30, 2015, or any of the quarters therein. During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company recorded an out-of-period adjustment to correct an error related to an understatement of its accrued retirement benefits for certain of its international benefit plans that contain minimum guarantees of approximately $470,000. The impact of this correction was to increase comprehensive loss by $470,000. The Company does not believe this error is material to its financial statements for any prior period, nor that the correction of this error is material to the year ended June 30, 2015. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance intended to amend current presentation guidance by requiring that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The amendments in this guidance are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 (the Company’s fiscal 2017). The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures. In August 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern. The amendments in this guidance are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2016 (the Company’s fiscal 2017), and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial disclosures. 41 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDIn June 2014, the FASB issued stock compensation guidance requiring that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The amendments in this guidance are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 (the Company’s fiscal 2017). The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures. In May 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance on revenue from contracts with customers. This revenue recognition guidance supersedes existing U.S.GAAP guidance, including most industry-specific guidance. The core principle is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance identifies steps to apply in achieving this principle. This updated guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017 (the Company’s fiscal 2019). The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures. In April 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance on the reporting for discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. The new guidance also requires expanded financial disclosures about discontinued operations. The amendments in this updated guidance are effective for the first quarter of the Company’s fiscal 2016. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures. In July 2013, the FASB issued guidance stating that, except in certain defined circumstances, an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2013 (the Company’s fiscal 2015). The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures. In March 2013, the FASB issued guidance on the parent company’s accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment upon derecognition of certain subsidiaries or groups of assets within a foreign entity or of an investment in a foreign entity. This guidance clarifies the circumstances under which the related cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2013 (the Company’s fiscal 2015). The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. B. Inventories The major classes of inventories at June 30 were as follows (in thousands): Finished parts Work-in-process Raw materials 2015 $56,982 8,292 14,967 $80,241 2014 $66,418 12,419 18,742 $97,579 Inventories stated on a LIFO basis represent approximately 28% of total inventories at June 30, 2015 and 2014. The approximate current cost of the LIFO inventories exceeded the LIFO cost by $26,816,000 and $27,180,000 at June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company had reserves for inventory obsolescence of $8,167,000 and $7,591,000 at June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. C. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment at June 30 were as follows (in thousands): Land Buildings Machinery and equipment Less: accumulated depreciation 2015 $ 6,646 44,110 133,432 184,188 127,761 $ 56,427 2014 $ 5,310 44,540 141,665 191,515 131,248 $ 60,267 Depreciation expense for the years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $9,922,000, $10,180,000 and $10,120,000, respectively. 42 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTD. Goodwill and Other Intangibles The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, substantially all of which is allocated to the manufacturing segment, for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands): Balance at June 30, 2013 Translation adjustment Balance at June 30, 2014 Translation adjustment Balance at June 30, 2015 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Impairment Net Book Value $16,902 231 17,133 (674) $16,459 $(3,670) - ( 3,670) - $(3,670) $13,232 231 13,463 (674) $12,789 The Company conducted its annual assessment for goodwill impairment during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2015 and concluded these assets are not impaired. At June 30, the following acquired intangible assets have definite useful lives and are subject to amortization (in thousands): Licensing agreements Non-compete agreements Trade name Other Licensing agreements Non-compete agreements Trade name Other Gross Carrying Amount $ 3,015 2,128 1,653 6,476 $13,272 Gross Carrying Amount $ 3,015 2,128 2,009 6,482 $13,634 2015 Accumulated Amortization $ (2,505) (2,045) (194) (5,278) $(10,022) 2014 Accumulated Amortization $(2,445) (2,045) (100) (5,193) $(9,783) Accumulated Impairment $ – (83) – (1,194) $(1,277) Accumulated Impairment $ – (83) – (1,194) $(1,277) Net Book Value $ 510 – 1,459 4 $1,973 Net Book Value $ 570 – 1,909 95 $2,574 Other intangibles consist of certain amortizable acquisition costs, proprietary technology, computer software, certain customer relationships and debt issuance costs on the 6.05% notes. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company committed to a plan and entered negotiations to exit the distribution agreement and sell the inventory of its Italian distributor back to the parent supplier. This decision triggered an impairment review of the long lived assets at this entity, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,405,000, representing a complete impairment of the remaining intangibles ($1,277,000) and fixed assets ($128,000) for this entity. The impairment charge was determined by deriving the fair value of the asset group utilizing a discounted cash flow model. Significant inputs to this model include the discount rate, sales projections and profitability estimates. These inputs would be considered Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The weighted average remaining useful life of the intangible assets included in the table above is approximately 16 years. 43 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDIntangible amortization expense for the years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $239,000, $477,000 and $718,000, respectively. Estimated intangible amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years is as follows (in thousands): Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter $ 146 141 141 141 141 1,263 $1,973 The gross carrying amount of the Company’s intangible assets that have indefinite lives and are not subject to amortization as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 are $213,000 and $223,000, respectively. These assets are comprised of acquired trade names. E. Accrued Liabilities Accrued liabilities at June 30 were as follows (in thousands): Salaries and wages Retirement benefits Warranty Customer advances/deferred revenue Restructuring Distributor rebate Other F. Warranty 2015 $ 8,568 3,773 3,310 2,602 3,776 2,989 7,736 2014 $ 6,648 4,909 3,917 3,082 785 3,242 8,682 $32,754 $31,265 The Company warrants all assembled products, parts (except component products or parts on which written warranties are issued by the respective manufacturers thereof and are furnished to the original customer, as to which the Company makes no warranty and assumes no liability) and service against defective materials or workmanship. Such warranty generally extends from periods ranging from 12 months to 24 months. The Company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of its suppliers. However, its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, the number of units affected by the failure and the expense involved in satisfactorily addressing the situation. The warranty reserve is established based on our best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. When evaluating the adequacy of the reserve for warranty costs, management takes into consideration the term of the warranty coverage, historical claim rates and costs of repair, knowledge of the type and volume of new products and economic trends. While we believe the warranty reserve is adequate and that the judgment applied is appropriate, such amounts estimated to be due and payable in the future could differ materially from what actually transpires. The following is a listing of the activity in the warranty reserve during the years ended June 30 (in thousands): Reserve balance, July 1 Current period expense Payments or credits to customers Translation adjustment Reserve balance, June 30 2015 $5,968 1,989 (2,332) (380) $5,245 2014 $5,701 2,214 (2,055) 108 $5,968 The current portion of the warranty accrual ($3,310,000 and $3,917,000 for fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively) is reflected in accrued liabilities, while the long-term portion ($1,935,000 and $2,051,000 for fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively) is included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. 44 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTG. Debt Notes Payable: Notes payable consists of amounts borrowed under unsecured line of credit agreements. These lines of credit may be withdrawn at the option of the banks. The following is aggregate borrowing information at June 30 (in thousands): Available credit lines Unused credit lines Total notes payable Weighted-average interest rates on credit lines Long-term Debt: Long-term debt consisted of the following at June 30 (in thousands): Revolving loan agreement 10-year unsecured senior notes Capital lease obligations Other long-term debt Subtotal Less: current maturities Total long-term debt 2015 $1,689 1,689 $ – 5.8% 2015 $10,208 3,571 – 23 13,802 (3,571) $10,231 2014 $3,372 3,372 $ – 2.9% 2014 $11,200 7,143 29 32 18,404 (3,604) $14,800 On June 30, 2014, the Company entered into a revolving loan agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the Company may, from time to time, enter into revolving credit loans in amounts not to exceed, in the aggregate, Wells Fargo’s revolving credit commitment of $60,000,000. The revolving credit commitment may be increased under the agreement by an additional $10,000,000 in the event that the conditions for “Incremental Loans” (as defined in the agreement) are satisfied. In general, outstanding revolving credit loans will bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.00%. The rate was 1.20% and 1.16% at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. In addition to principal and interest payments, the Company will be responsible for paying monthly commitment fees equal to 0.15% of the unused revolving credit commitment. The Company has the option of making additional prepayments subject to certain limitations. The Credit Agreement is scheduled to expire on May 31, 2018. The outstanding balance of $10,208,000 and $11,200,000 at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively, is classified as long-term debt. This agreement contains certain covenants, including restrictions on investments, acquisitions and indebtedness. Financial covenants include a minimum consolidated adjusted net worth amount, a minimum EBITDA for the most recent four fiscal quarters of $11,000,000 at June 30, 2015, and a maximum total funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.0 at June 30, 2015. On August 3, 2015, the Credit Agreement was amended to revise the definition of EBITDA for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on and including June 30, 2015 to and including March 25, 2016 to add $3,300,000, reflective of the restructuring charge taken by the Company in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015. As of June 30, 2015, the Company was in compliance with these financial covenants. The minimum adjusted net worth covenant fluctuates based upon actual earnings and the Company’s compliance with that covenant is based on the Company’s shareholders’ equity as adjusted by certain pension accounting items. As of June 30, 2015, the minimum adjusted equity requirement was $124,741,000, and the Company was in compliance with this covenant. On June 30, 2014, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement (the “Prudential Agreement”). Among other things, the Prudential Agreement: (a) amends and restates the “Note Agreement” between the Company and Purchasers dated as of April 10, 2006, as it has been amended from time to time (the “2006 Agreement”); and (b) sets forth the terms of the potential sale and purchase of up to $50,000,000 in “Shelf Notes” as defined in the Prudential Agreement (the “Shelf Notes”) by the Company to Prudential. The notes sold by the Company to the Existing Holders under the 2006 Agreement (the “2006 Notes”) are deemed outstanding under, and are governed by, the terms of the Prudential Agreement. The 2006 Notes bear interest on the outstanding principal balance at a fixed rate of 6.05% per annum and mature on April 10, 2016. The 2006 Notes mature and become due and payable in full on April 10, 2016 (the “Payment Date”). Prior to the Payment Date, the Company was obligated to make quarterly payments of interest during the term of the 2006 Notes, plus prepayments of principal of $3,571,429 on April 10 of each year from 2010 to 2015, inclusive. The outstanding balance was $3,571,429 and $7,142,857 at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. Of the outstanding balance, $3,571,429 was classified as a current maturity of long-term debt at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. The remaining $3,571,429 on June 30, 2014 was classified as long-term debt. In addition to the interest 45 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDpayments and any mandatory principal payments required under the terms of the Shelf Note, the Company will pay an issuance fee of 0.10% of the aggregate principal balance of each of the Shelf Notes sold to, and purchased by, Prudential. The Company may prepay the Shelf Notes or the 2006 Notes, subject to certain limitations. At no time during the term of the Prudential Agreement may the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 2006 Notes and the Shelf Notes exceed $35,000,000. The Prudential Agreement includes financial covenants regarding minimum net worth, minimum EBITDA for the most recent four (4) fiscal quarters of $11,000,000 and a maximum total funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.0. On August 3, 2015, the Prudential Agreement was amended to revise the definition of EBITDA for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on and including June 30, 2015 to and including March 25, 2016 to add $3,300,000, reflective of the restructuring charge taken by the Company in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015. As of June 30, 2015, the Company was in compliance with these financial covenants. In addition, the Company will be required to make an offer to purchase the 2006 Notes and Shelf Notes upon a Change of Control, and any such offer must include the payment of a Yield-Maintenance Amount. The Prudential Agreement also includes certain covenants that limit, among other things, certain indebtedness, acquisitions and investments. The Prudential Agreement also has a most favored lender provision whereby the Prudential Agreement shall be automatically modified to include any additional covenant or event of default that is included in any agreement evidencing, securing, guarantying or otherwise related to other indebtedness in excess of $1,000,000. The aggregate scheduled maturities of outstanding long-term debt obligations in subsequent years are as follows (in thousands): Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter H. Lease Commitments Approximate future minimum rental commitments under noncancellable operating leases are as follows (in thousands): Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter $ 3,571 – 10,208 – – 23 $13,802 $2,955 2,568 1,910 406 232 11 $8,082 Total rent expense for operating leases approximated $3,550,000, $3,920,000 and $3,863,000 in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. I. Shareholders’ Equity The total number of shares of common stock outstanding at June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was 11,267,347, 11,261,873 and 11,212,952, respectively. At June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, treasury stock consisted of 1,832,121, 1,837,595 and 1,886,516 shares of common stock, respectively. The Company issued 49,314, 51,921 and 123,997 shares of treasury stock in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, to fulfill its obligations under the stock option plans and restricted stock grants. The Company also recorded forfeitures of 46,240 and 3,000 shares of previously issued restricted stock in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. The difference between the cost of treasury shares and the option price is recorded in common stock. On February 1, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of 500,000 shares of common stock at market values. In fiscal 2009, the Company purchased 250,000 shares of its outstanding common stock at an average price of $7.25 per share for a total cost of $1,812,500. In fiscal 2012, the Company purchased 125,000 shares of its outstanding common stock at an average price of $19.40 per share for a total cost of $2,425,000. On July 27, 2012, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of an additional 375,000 shares of common stock at market values. This authorization has no expiration. In fiscal 2013, the Company purchased 185,000 shares of its outstanding common stock at an average price of $16.59 per share for a total cost of $3,068,652. 46 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTCash dividends per share were $0.36, $0.36 and $0.36 in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Effective June 30, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors established a Shareholder Rights Plan and distributed to shareholders one preferred stock purchase right (a “Right’) for each outstanding share of common stock. This Shareholder Rights Plan was amended on May 1, 2012. Under certain circumstances, a Right can be exercised to purchase one four hundredth of a share of Series A Junior Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $125, subject to certain anti dilution adjustments. The Rights will become exercisable on the earlier of: (i) ten business days following a public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons (an “Acquiring Person”) has acquired, or obtained the right to acquire from shareholders, beneficial ownership of 20% or more of the outstanding Company’s common stock (or 30% or more in the case of any person or group which currently owns 20% or more of the shares or who shall become the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the shares as a result of any transfer by reason of the death of or by gift from any other person who is an affiliate or an associate of such existing holder or by succeeding such a person as trustee of a trust existing on the Record Date (“Existing Holder”)) or (ii) ten business days following the commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer that would result in a person or group beneficially owning 20% or more of such outstanding Common Stock (or 30% or more for an Existing Holder), as such periods may be extended pursuant to the Rights Agreement. In the event that any person or group becomes an Acquiring Person, each holder of a Right shall thereafter have the right to receive, upon exercise, in lieu of Preferred Stock, common stock of the Company having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the Right. However, Rights are not exercisable as described in this paragraph until such time as the Rights are no longer redeemable by the Company as set forth below. Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, if any person becomes an Acquiring Person all Rights that are, or (under certain circumstances specified in the Rights Agreement) were, beneficially owned by an Acquiring Person will become null and void. The Rights will expire at the close of business on June 30, 2018, unless earlier redeemed or exchanged by the Company. At any time before a person becomes an Acquiring Person, the Company may redeem the Rights in whole, but not in part, at a price of $.01 per Right, appropriately adjusted to reflect any stock split, stock dividend or similar transaction occurring after the date hereof. Immediately upon the action of the Board of Directors ordering redemption of the Rights, the Rights will terminate and the only right of the holders of Rights will be to receive the $.01 redemption price. The Company is authorized to issue 200,000 shares of preferred stock, none of which have been issued. The Company has designated 150,000 shares of the preferred stock for the purpose of the Shareholder Rights Plan. The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in equity as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows (in thousands): Translation adjustments Benefit plan adjustments, net of income taxes of $24,411 and $21,436, respectively Accumulated other comprehensive loss 2015 $ 6,740 (42,221) $(35,481) 2014 $ 20,779 (36,722) $(15,943) A reconciliation for the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, by component for the years ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2015 is as follows: Balance at June 30, 2013 Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income Net current period other comprehensive income Balance at June 30, 2014 Balance at June 30, 2014 Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income Net current period other comprehensive income Balance at June 30, 2015 Translation Adjustment $ 16,949 3,830 – 3,830 Benefit Plan Adjustment $(42,848) 3,950 2,176 6,126 $ 20,779 $(36,722) Translation Adjustment $ 20,779 (14,039) – (14,039) $ 6,740 Benefit Plan Adjustment $(36,722) (7,518) 2,019 (5,499) $(42,221) 47 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDA reconciliation for the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax for the year ended June 30, 2014 is as follows: Amortization of benefit plan items Actuarial losses Transition asset and prior service benefit Total before tax benefit Tax benefit Total reclassification net of tax Amount Reclassified $(3,496) (31) (3,527) 1,351 $(2,176) A reconciliation for the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax for the year ended June 30, 2015 is as follows: Amortization of benefit plan items Actuarial losses Transition asset and prior service benefit Total before tax benefit Tax benefit Total reclassification net of tax Amount Reclassified $(3,074) (36) (3,110) 1,091 $(2,019) J. Business Segments and Foreign Operations The Company and its subsidiaries are engaged in the manufacture and sale of marine and heavy duty off-highway power transmission equipment. Principal products include marine transmissions, surface drives, propellers and boat management systems, as well as power-shift transmissions, hydraulic torque converters, power take-offs, industrial clutches and controls systems. The Company sells to both domestic and foreign customers in a variety of market areas, principally pleasure craft, commercial and military marine markets, as well as in the energy and natural resources, government and industrial markets. Net sales by product group is summarized as follows (in thousands): Industrial Land based transmissions Marine and propulsion systems Other Total 2015 $ 42,078 76,450 141,137 6,125 $265,790 2014 $ 41,188 67,055 149,432 6,234 $263,909 2013 $ 48,110 68,535 162,823 5,814 $285,282 Industrial products include clutches, power take-offs and pump drives sold to the agriculture, recycling, construction and oil and gas markets. The land based transmission products include applications for oilfield and natural gas, military and airport rescue and fire fighting. The marine and propulsion systems include marine transmission, controls, surface drives, propellers and boat management systems for the global commercial, pleasure craft and patrol boat markets. Other products includes non-Twin Disc manufactured product sold through our Company- owned distribution entities. The Company has two reportable segments: manufacturing and distribution. These segments are managed separately because each provides different services and requires different technology and marketing strategies. The accounting practices of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Transfers among segments are at established inter-company selling prices. Management evaluates the performance of its segments based on net earnings. 48 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTInformation about the Company’s segments is summarized as follows (in thousands): Manufacturing Distribution Total 2015 Net sales Intra-segment sales Inter-segment sales Interest income Interest expense Income taxes Depreciation and amortization Net earnings attributable to Twin Disc Assets Expenditures for segment assets 2014 Net sales Intra-segment sales Inter-segment sales Interest income Interest expense Income taxes Depreciation and amortization Net earnings attributable to Twin Disc Assets Expenditures for segment assets 2013 Net sales Intra-segment sales Inter-segment sales Interest income Interest expense Income taxes Depreciation and amortization Net earnings attributable to Twin Disc Assets Expenditures for segment assets $240,085 19,901 44,864 171 946 7,312 8,106 14,409 254,749 7,335 $227,590 18,416 53,960 311 2,565 6,233 8,566 7,029 254,652 6,429 $245,592 16,140 55,746 479 3,248 5,112 8,817 10,141 258,617 5,705 $100,708 6,961 3,277 33 – 1,459 482 5,013 53,759 1,271 $121,389 9,926 2,768 22 45 1,432 549 6,285 57,233 315 $130,360 15,127 3,657 19 62 1,630 497 5,840 56,965 349 $340,793 26,862 48,141 204 946 8,771 8,588 19,422 308,508 8,606 $348,979 28,342 56,728 333 2,610 7,665 9,115 13,314 311,885 6,744 $375,952 31,267 59,403 498 3,310 6,742 9,314 15,981 315,582 6,054 49 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDThe following is a reconciliation of reportable segment net sales, net earnings and assets to the Company’s consolidated totals (in thousands): 2015 2014 2013 Net sales: Total net sales from reportable segments Elimination of inter-company sales Total consolidated net sales Net earnings attributable to Twin Disc: Total net earnings from reportable segments Other corporate expenses Total consolidated net earnings attributable to Twin Disc Assets Total assets for reportable segments Corporate assets and eliminations Total consolidated assets Other significant items (in thousands): 2015 Interest income Interest expense Income taxes Depreciation and amortization Expenditures for segment assets 2014 Interest income Interest expense Income taxes Depreciation and amortization Expenditures for segment assets 2013 Interest income Interest expense Income taxes Depreciation and amortization Expenditures for segment assets $375,952 (90,670) $285,282 $ 15,981 (12,099) $ 3,882 $340,793 (75,003) $265,790 $ 19,422 (8,249) $ 11,173 $308,508 (58,646) $249,862 $348,979 (85,070) $263,909 $ 13,314 (9,670) $ 3,644 $311,885 (44,900) $266,985 Segment Totals Adjustments Consolidated Totals $ 204 946 8,771 8,588 8,606 $ 333 2,610 7,665 9,115 6,744 $ 498 3,310 6,742 9,314 6,054 $ (80) (340) (4,256) 1,573 443 $ (212) (1,674) (3,439) 1,542 501 $ (396) (1,875) (1,756) 1,524 528 $ 124 606 4,515 10,161 9,049 $ 121 936 4,226 10,657 7,245 $ 102 1,435 4,986 10,838 6,582 All adjustments represent inter-company eliminations and corporate amounts. 50 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTGeographic information about the Company is summarized as follows (in thousands): Net sales United States China Italy Singapore Canada Other countries Total Net sales by geographic region are based on product shipment destination. Long-lived assets United States Switzerland Belgium Italy Other countries Total 2015 2014 2013 $131,198 $108,380 $127,844 19,712 14,457 13,856 13,661 72,906 33,830 17,396 12,703 9,277 82,323 29,119 19,140 14,214 10,846 84,119 $265,790 $263,909 $285,282 2015 2014 $40,822 7,686 6,709 2,376 2,586 $60,179 $46,821 8,196 7,450 3,531 2,074 $68,072 One customer, Sewart Supply, Inc. (a distributor of Twin Disc), accounted for approximately 11%, 11% and 11% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. K. Stock-Based Compensation During fiscal 2011, the Company adopted the Twin Disc, Incorporated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Directors’ Plan”), a plan to grant non-employee directors equity based awards up to 250,000 shares of common stock, and the Twin Disc, Incorporated 2010 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), a plan under which officers and key employees may be granted equity based awards up to 650,000 shares of common stock. The Directors’ Plan may grant options to purchase shares of common stock, at the discretion of the board, to non-employee directors who are elected or reelected to the board, or who continue to serve on the board. Such options carry an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the date of grant, vest immediately, and expire ten years after the date of grant. Options granted under the Incentive Plan are determined to be non-qualified or incentive stock options as of the date of grant, and may carry a vesting schedule. For options under the Incentive Plan that are intended to qualify as incentive stock options, if the optionee owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of the Company’s stock, the price will not be less than 110% of the grant date fair market value and the options expire five years after the date of grant. There were no incentive options granted to a greater than 10% shareholder during the years presented. There were no options outstanding under the Directors’ Plan and the Incentive Plan as of June 30, 2015 and 2014. The Company has 19,200 non-qualified stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2015 under the Twin Disc, Incorporated Plan for Non-Employee Directors and Twin Disc, Incorporated 2004 Stock Incentive Plans. The 2004 plans were terminated during 2011, except options then outstanding will remain so until exercised or until they expire. Shares available for future options as of June 30 were as follows: 2010 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan 2010 Stock Incentive Plan for Non-employee Directors 2015 447,730 171,986 2014 466,589 193,858 51 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDStock option transactions under the plans during 2015 were as follows: 2015 Weighted Average Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value Non-qualified stock options: Options outstanding at beginning of year 21,600 $14.88 Granted Canceled/expired Exercised Options outstanding at June 30 Options price range ($10.01 - $27.55) Number of shares Weighted average price Weighted average remaining life – – 6.23 $15.96 – – (2,400) 19,200 19,200 $15.96 3.31 years 3.31 $81,492 The Company accounts for stock based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718-10, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” In addition, the Company computes its windfall tax pool using the shortcut method. ASC Topic 718-10 requires the Company to expense the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments using the fair-value-based method. All options were 100% vested at the adoption of this statement. During fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013 the Company granted no non-qualified stock options and all non-qualified stock options from prior periods have fully vested. As a result, no compensation cost has been recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was approximately $55,000, $0 and $539,000, respectively. In fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company granted a target number of 15,861, 43,154 and 28,255 performance stock unit awards, respectively, to various employees of the Company, including executive officers. The performance stock unit awards granted in fiscal 2015 will vest if the Company achieves a specified target objective relating to consolidated economic profit (as defined in the Performance Stock Unit Award Grant Agreement) in the cumulative three fiscal year period ending June 30, 2017. The performance stock unit awards granted in fiscal 2015 are subject to adjustment if the Company’s economic profit for the period falls below or exceeds the specified target objective, and the maximum number of performance stock units that can be awarded if the target objective is exceeded is 13,621. Based upon actual results to date and the low probability of achieving the threshold performance levels, the Company is not accruing the performance stock unit awards granted in fiscal 2015. The performance stock unit awards granted in fiscal 2014 will vest if the Company achieves a specified target objective relating to consolidated economic profit (as defined in the Performance Stock Unit Award Grant Agreement) in the cumulative three fiscal year period ending June 30, 2016. The performance stock unit awards granted in fiscal 2014 are subject to adjustment if the Company’s economic profit for the period falls below or exceeds the specified target objective, and the maximum number of performance stock units that can be awarded if the target objective is exceeded is 22,205. Based upon actual results to date and the low probability of achieving the threshold performance levels, the Company is not accruing the performance stock unit awards granted in fiscal 2014. The performance stock unit awards granted in fiscal 2013 are subject to adjustment if the Company’s economic profit for the period falls below or exceeds the specified target objective, and the maximum number of performance stock units that can be awarded if the target objective is exceeded is 22,487. Based upon actual results to date and the low probability of achieving the threshold performance levels, the Company is not accruing the performance stock unit awards granted in fiscal 2013 and has reversed previously recognized expenses related to these awards during the second quarter of fiscal 2013. There were 29,855, 41,160 and 42,962 unvested performance stock unit awards outstanding at June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of the unvested awards at June 30, 2015 was $27.24. The performance stock unit awards are remeasured at fair-value based upon the Company’s stock price at the end of each reporting period. The fair-value of the stock unit awards are expensed over the performance period for the shares that are expected to ultimately vest. The compensation expense (income) for the year ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 related to the performance stock unit award grants, approximated $0, $0 and $1,238,000, respectively. At June 30, 2015, the Company had $537,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested shares that would vest if the specified target objective was achieved for the fiscal 2015 and 2014 awards. The total fair value of performance stock unit awards vested in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $0, $0 and $2,787,000, respectively. The performance stock unit awards are cash based, and are thus recorded as a liability on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2015, there were no awards included in “Liabilities” due to actual results to date and the low probability of achieving any of the threshold performance levels. 52 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTIn fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company granted a target number of 16,261, 17,312 and 28,535 performance stock awards, respectively, to various employees of the Company, including executive officers. The performance stock awards granted in fiscal 2015 will vest if the Company achieves a specified target objective relating to consolidated economic profit (as defined in the Performance Stock Award Grant Agreement) in the cumulative three fiscal year period ending June 30, 2017. The performance stock awards granted in fiscal 2015 are subject to adjustment if the Company’s economic profit for the period falls below or exceeds the specified target objective, and the maximum number of performance shares that can be awarded if the target objective is exceeded is 14,101. Based upon actual results to date and the low probability of achieving the threshold performance levels, the Company is not accruing the performance stock awards granted in fiscal 2015. The performance stock awards granted in fiscal 2014 will vest if the Company achieves a specified target objective relating to consolidated economic profit (as defined in the Performance Stock Award Grant Agreement) in the cumulative three fiscal year period ending June 30, 2016. The performance stock awards granted in fiscal 2014 are subject to adjustment if the Company’s economic profit for the period falls below or exceeds the specified target objective, and the maximum number of performance shares that can be awarded if the target objective is exceeded is 17,038. Based upon actual results to date and the low probability of achieving the threshold performance levels, the Company is not accruing the performance stock awards granted in fiscal 2014. The performance stock awards granted in fiscal 2013 are subject to adjustment if the Company’s economic profit for the period falls below or exceeds the specified target objective, and the maximum number of performance shares that can be awarded if the target objective is exceeded is 30,635. Based upon actual results to date and the low probability of achieving the threshold performance levels, the Company is not accruing the performance stock awards granted in fiscal 2013 and has reversed previously recognized expenses related to these awards during the second quarter of fiscal 2013. There were 25,949, 44,712 and 42,141 unvested performance stock awards outstanding at June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The fair value of the stock awards (on the date of grant) is expensed over the performance period for the shares that are expected to ultimately vest. The compensation expense for the year ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, related to performance stock awards, approximated $0, $0 and $209,000, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of the unvested awards at June 30, 2015 was $27.36. At June 30, 2015, the Company had $710,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested shares that would vest if the specified target objective was achieved for the fiscal 2015 and 2014 awards. The total fair value of performance stock awards vested in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $0, $0 and $2,055,000, respectively. In addition to the performance shares mentioned above, the Company has unvested restricted stock outstanding that will vest if certain service conditions are fulfilled. The fair value of the restricted stock grants is recorded as compensation over the vesting period, which is generally 1 to 3 years. During fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company granted 59,494, 51,004 and 83,729 service based restricted shares, respectively, to employees and non-employee directors in each year. A total of 46,240, 3,000 and 30,532 shares of restricted stock were forfeited during fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. There were 94,183, 116,297 and 186,469 unvested shares outstanding at June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Compensation expense of $696,000, $1,184,000 and $1,234,000 was recognized during the year ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, related to these service-based awards. The total fair value of restricted stock grants vested in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $993,000, $3,053,000 and $2,177,000, respectively. As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $923,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock which will be recognized over the next three years. L. Engineering and Development Costs Engineering and development costs include research and development expenses for new products, development and major improvements to existing products, and other costs for ongoing efforts to refine existing products. Research and development costs charged to operations totaled $2,288,000, $3,028,000 and $3,058,000 in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Total engineering and development costs were $11,091,000, $10,900,000 and $10,242,000 in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. M. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans The Company has non-contributory, qualified defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all domestic employees hired prior to October 1, 2003, and certain foreign employees. Domestic plan benefits are based on years of service, and, for salaried employees, on average compensation for benefits earned prior to January 1, 1997, and on a cash balance plan for benefits earned after January 1, 1997. The Company’s funding policy for the plans covering domestic employees is to contribute an actuarially determined amount which falls between the minimum and maximum amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes. On June 3, 2009, the Company announced it would freeze future accruals under the domestic defined benefit pension plans effective August 1, 2009. In addition, the Company has unfunded, non-qualified retirement plans for certain management employees and Directors. In the case of management employees, benefits are based either on final average compensation or on an annual credit to a bookkeeping account, intended to restore the benefits that would have been earned under the qualified plans, but for the earnings limitations under the Internal Revenue Code. In the case of Directors, benefits are based on years of service on the Board. All benefits vest upon retirement from the Company. In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides other postretirement benefits, including healthcare and life insurance benefits for certain domestic retirees. All employees retiring after December 31, 1992, and electing to continue healthcare coverage through the Company’s group plan, are required to pay 100% of the premium cost. 53 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDThe measurement date for the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans in fiscal 2015 and 2014 was June 30. Obligations and Funded Status The following table sets forth the Company’s defined benefit pension plans’ and other postretirement benefit plans’ funded status and the amounts recognized in the Company’s balance sheets and statement of operations and comprehensive income as of June 30 (in thousands): Change in benefit obligation: Benefit obligation, beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Actuarial loss (gain) Contributions by plan participants Settlements Benefits paid Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits 2015 2014 2015 2014 $123,832 $125,846 $ 16,584 $ 17,739 465 4,862 8,384 154 – (9,964) 536 5,425 1,221 174 (121) (9,249) 30 579 882 547 – 37 659 (60) 581 – (2,250) (2,372) Benefit obligation, end of year $127,733 $123,832 $ 16,372 $ 16,584 Change in plan assets: Fair value of assets, beginning of year Actual return on plan assets Employer contribution Contributions by plan participants Benefits paid $102,495 5,828 6,168 154 (9,964) $ 94,723 14,031 2,816 174 (9,249) $ – $ – – 1,703 547 (2,250) – 1,791 581 (2,372) Fair value of assets, end of year $104,681 $102,495 $ – $ – Funded status $ (23,052) $ (21,337) $(16,372) $(16,584) Amounts recognized in the balance sheet consist of: Other assets - noncurrent Accrued liabilities - current Accrued retirement benefits - noncurrent $ 638 (764) (22,926) $ 680 (1,189) (20,828) $ – (2,040) (14,332) $ – (2,418) (14,166) Net amount recognized $(23,052) $ (21,337) $(16,372) $(16,584) Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of (net of tax): Net transition obligation Actuarial net loss Net amount recognized $ 296 38,613 $ 38,909 $ 340 33,220 $ 33,560 $ – 3,312 $ 3,312 $ – 3,163 $ 3,163 The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost during the next fiscal year for the qualified domestic defined benefit and other postretirement benefit plans are as follows (in thousands): Net transition obligation Actuarial net loss Net amount to be recognized Pension Benefits $ 35 3,646 $3,681 Other Postretirement Benefits $ – 728 $728 The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was approximately $127,733,000 and $123,832,000 at June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. 54 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTInformation for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets (in thousands): Projected and accumulated benefit obligation Fair value of plan assets Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (in thousands): Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Settlement loss Amortization of transition obligation Amortization of actuarial net loss Net periodic benefit cost Service cost Interest cost Amortization of actuarial net loss Net periodic benefit cost June 30 2015 $126,242 102,552 2014 $122,045 100,028 Pension Benefits 2015 $ 465 4,862 (7,272) - 36 2,436 $ 527 2014 $ 536 5,425 (6,591) - 32 2,894 $2,296 Other Postretirement Benefits 2015 $ 30 579 638 $1,247 2014 $ 37 659 602 $1,298 2013 $ 367 5,399 (6,382) 5 35 3,357 $2,781 2013 $ 34 766 792 $1,592 Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income for Fiscal 2015 (Pre-tax, in thousands): Net loss Amortization of transition asset Amortization of net (loss) gain Total recognized in other comprehensive income Net periodic benefit cost Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income Other Postretirement Benefits $ 882 – (638) 244 1,247 $ 1,491 Pension $ 9,406 (36) (2,436) 6,934 527 $ 7,461 55 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDAdditional Information Assumptions (as of June 30, 2015 and 2014) Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at June 30 Discount rate Expected return on plan assets Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended June 30 Discount rate Expected return on plan assets Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits 2015 4.05% 7.11% 2014 4.06% 7.39% 2015 3.93% 2014 3.76% Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits 2015 4.06% 7.39% 2014 4.35% 7.41% 2013 4.20% 7.50% 2015 3.76% 2014 3.99% 2013 4.20% The assumed weighted-average healthcare cost trend rate was 7.8% in 2015, grading down to 5% in 2022. A 1% increase in the assumed health care cost trend would increase the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by approximately $336,000 and the service and interest cost by approximately $13,000. A 1% decrease in the assumed health care cost trend would decrease the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by approximately $322,000 and the service and interest cost by approximately $12,000. Plan Assets The Company’s Pension Committee (“Committee”) oversees investment matters related to the Company’s funded benefit plans. The Committee works with external actuaries and investment consultants on an ongoing basis to establish and monitor investment strategies and target asset allocations. The overall objective of the Committee’s investment strategy is to earn a rate of return over time to satisfy the benefit obligations of the pension plans and to maintain sufficient liquidity to pay benefits and address other cash requirements of the pension plans. The Committee has established an Investment Policy Statement which provides written documentation of the Company’s expectations regarding its investment programs for the pension plans, establishes objectives and guidelines for the investment of the plan assets consistent with the Company’s financial and benefit-related goals, and outlines criteria and procedures for the ongoing evaluation of the investment program. The Company employs a total return on investment approach whereby a mix of investments among several asset classes are used to maximize long-term return of plan assets while avoiding excessive risk. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews, and annual liability measurements. The Company’s pension plan weighted-average asset allocations at June 30, 2015 and 2014 by asset category are as follows: Asset Category Equity securities Debt securities Real estate Target Allocation 65% 25% 10% 100% June 30 2015 62% 25% 13% 100% 2014 65% 23% 12% 100% Due to market conditions and other factors, actual asset allocation may vary from the target allocation outlined above. The U.S. pension plans held 98,211 shares of Company stock with a fair market value of $1,830,653 (1.8 percent of total plan assets) at June 30, 2015 and 98,211 shares with a fair market value of $3,245,874 (3.2 percent of total plan assets) at June 30, 2014. The plans have a long-term return assumption of 7.25%. This rate was derived based upon historical experience and forward-looking return expectations for major asset class categories. 56 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTFair value is defined as the price that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The inputs used to measure fair value are classified into the following hierarchy: Level I Level II Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments, or Unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, or Other inputs that are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data Level III Use of one or more significant unobservable inputs The following table presents plan assets using the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2015 (in thousands): Cash and cash equivalents Equity securities: U.S. (a) International (b) Fixed income (c) Annuity contracts (d) Real estate (e) Other (f) Total Total $ 1,034 28,035 14,819 22,615 9,508 12,770 15,900 Level I $ 1,034 28,035 10,649 8,993 – – – $104,681 $48,711 The following table presents plan assets using the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2014 (in thousands): Cash and cash equivalents Equity securities: U.S. (a) International (b) Fixed income (c) Annuity contracts (d) Real estate (e) Other (f) Total Total $ 965 30,727 16,676 21,892 6,340 11,206 14,689 Level I $ 965 30,727 10,785 7,603 – – – $102,495 $50,080 Level II $ – – 4,170 13,622 – 12,770 – $30,562 Level II $ – – 5,891 14,289 – 11,206 – $31,386 Level III $ – – – – 9,508 – 15,900 $25,408 Level III $ – – – – 6,340 – 14,689 $21,029 (a) U.S. equity securities include companies that are well diversified by industry sector and equity style (i.e., growth and value strategies). Investments are primarily in large capitalization stocks and, to a lesser extent, mid- and small-cap stocks. These securities are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded. (b) International equities are invested in companies that are traded on exchanges outside the U.S. and are well diversified by industry sector, country, capitalization and equity style (i.e., growth and value strategies). Certain assets are invested in international commingled equity funds. The vast majority of the investments are made in companies in developed markets with a smaller percentage in emerging markets. Securities traded on exchanges are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded. International commingled funds are valued at the net asset value (“NAV”) as determined by the custodian of the fund. The NAV is based on the fair value of the underlying assets owned by the fund, minus its liabilities, divided by the number of units outstanding. (c) Fixed income consists of corporate bonds with investment grade BBB or better from diversified industries, as well as government debt securities. Corporate and government debt investments are valued utilizing a market approach that includes various valuation techniques and sources such as value generation models, broker quotes in active and inactive markets, benchmark yields and securities, reported trades, issuer spreads, and/or other applicable reference data. (d) Annuity contracts represent contractual agreements in which payments are made to an insurance company, which agrees to pay out an income or lump sum amount at a later date. Annuity contracts are valued at the net present value of future cash flows. 57 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED(e) Real estate investments invested in common collective trusts and other mutual funds holding real estate investments. They are valued at the net asset value (“NAV”) as determined by the custodian of the fund. The NAV is based on the fair value of the underlying assets owned by the fund, minus its liabilities, divided by the number of units outstanding. Level 2 investments represent funds where regular opportunities exist for the Company to sell the holdings, whereas Level 3 investments represent funds where less frequent opportunities exist during the year for the Company to sell its holding in the funds. (f) Other consists of hedged equity mutual funds. These investments are valued at the net asset value (“NAV”) as determined by the custodian of the fund. The NAV is based on the fair value of the underlying assets owned by the fund, minus its liabilities, divided by the number of units outstanding. The following tables present a reconciliation of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level III) as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands): Balance – June 30, 2014 Actual return on plan assets: Relating to assets still held at reporting date Relating to assets sold during the period Purchases, sales and settlements, net Transfers in and/or out of Level III Balance – June 30, 2015 Balance – June 30, 2013 Actual return on plan assets: Relating to assets still held at reporting date Relating to assets sold during the period Purchases, sales and settlements, net Transfers in and/or out of Level III Balance – June 30, 2014 Cash Flows Contributions Annuity Contracts $6,340 2,978 – 190 – $9,508 Annuity Contracts $5,819 433 – 88 – $6,340 Other $14,689 1,211 – – – $15,900 Real Estate $ 3,012 – 257 (3,269) – $ – Other $13,153 1,536 – – – $14,689 The Company expects to contribute $2,240,000 to its defined benefit pension plans in fiscal 2016. Estimated Future Benefit Payments The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (in thousands): 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Years 2021- 2025 Pension Benefits $10,446 9,927 10,913 9,756 9,231 40,355 Other Postretirement Benefits Gross Benefits $2,379 2,349 1,844 1,734 1,584 6,157 Part D Reimbursement Net Benefit Payments $ – – – – – – $2,379 2,349 1,844 1,734 1,584 6,157 The Company sponsors defined contribution plans covering substantially all domestic employees and certain foreign employees. These plans provide for employer contributions based primarily on employee participation. The total expense under the plans was $2,526,000, $2,218,000 and $2,074,000 in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. 58 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTN. Income Taxes United States and foreign earnings before income taxes and minority interest were as follows (in thousands): United States Foreign 2015 $ 5,614 10,286 $15,900 2014 $1,107 6,989 $8,096 2013 $3,935 5,302 $9,237 The provision (benefit) for income taxes is comprised of the following (in thousands): 2015 2014 2013 Currently payable: Federal State Foreign Deferred: Federal State Foreign $1,607 518 2,832 4,957 408 5 (855) (442) $ 651 104 2,837 3,592 1,309 (95) (580) 634 $4,515 $4,226 $1,745 (234) 2,788 4,299 1,122 439 (874) 687 $4,986 The components of the net deferred tax asset as of June 30 are summarized in the table below (in thousands). Deferred tax assets: Retirement plans and employee benefits Foreign tax credit carryforwards Federal tax credits State net operating loss and other state credit carryforwards Inventory Reserves Foreign NOL carryforwards Accruals Other assets Deferred tax liabilities: Property, plant and equipment Intangibles Other liabilities Valuation Allowance Total net deferred tax assets 2015 2014 $15,157 $13,692 – – 369 1,789 2,587 3,539 584 568 24,593 7,221 4,778 451 12,450 (3,577) $ 8,566 706 160 348 1,672 2,578 6,090 681 (54) 25,873 8,650 5,528 711 14,889 (5,593) $ 5,391 Note: $82,000 and $166,000 of this net deferred tax position is included in Accrued Liabilities at June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company maintains valuation allowances when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances from period to period are included in the tax provision in the period of change. In determining whether a valuation allowance is required, the Company takes into account such factors as prior earnings history, expected future earnings, carry-back and carry-forward periods, and tax strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of realization of a deferred tax asset. During fiscal 59 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED2015, the Company reported operating income in certain foreign jurisdictions where the loss carryforward period is unlimited. The Company has evaluated the likelihood of whether the net deferred tax assets related to these jurisdictions would be realized and concluded that based primarily upon the uncertainty to achieve levels of sustained improvement and uncertain exchange rates in these jurisdictions, (a) it is more likely than not that $3,577,000 of deferred tax assets would not be realized; and that (b) a full valuation allowance on the balance of deferred tax assets relating to these jurisdictions continues to be necessary. The company recorded a net decrease in valuation allowance of $2,016,000 in fiscal 2015 due to lower cumulative operating losses in these jurisdictions. Management believes that it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income and foreign source income to realize the remaining deferred tax assets. Following is a reconciliation of the applicable U.S. federal income taxes to the actual income taxes reflected in the statements of operations (in thousands): U.S. federal income tax at 35% Increases (reductions) in tax resulting from: Foreign tax items State taxes Valuation allowance Change in prior year estimate Research and development tax credits Section 199 deduction Unrecognized tax benefits Other, net 2015 $5,491 362 32 (1,121) 157 (337) (96) 5 22 $ 4,515 2014 $2,754 (291) 228 1,551 139 (267) (109) 183 38 $4,226 2013 $3,104 88 296 1,216 309 (526) (84) 539 44 $4,986 The Company has not provided additional U.S. income taxes on cumulative earnings of consolidated foreign subsidiaries that are considered to be reinvested indefinitely. The Company reaffirms its position that these earnings remain permanently invested, and has no plans to repatriate funds to the U.S. for the foreseeable future. These earnings relate to ongoing operations and were approximately $3,045,000 at June 30, 2015. Such earnings could become taxable upon the sale or liquidation of these foreign subsidiaries or upon dividend repatriation. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of unrecognized withholding taxes and deferred tax liability on such earnings. The Company’s intent is for such earnings to be reinvested by the subsidiaries or to be repatriated only when it would be tax effective through the utilization of foreign tax credits. Annually, we file income tax returns in various taxing jurisdictions inside and outside the United States. In general, the tax years that remain subject to examination are 2011 through 2015 for our major operations in Italy, Belgium and Japan. The tax years open to examination in the U.S. are for years subsequent to fiscal 2012. The Company has approximately $810,000 of unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2015, which, if recognized would impact the effective tax rate. During the fiscal year the amount of unrecognized tax benefits decreased primarily due to settlements with various taxing authorities. During the next twelve months, the Company does not anticipate any significant changes in unrecognized tax benefits. The Company’s policy is to accrue interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Below is a reconciliation of beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands): Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year Additions based on tax positions related to the prior year Additions based on tax positions related to the current year Reductions based on tax positions related to the prior year Subtractions due to statutes closing Settlements with Taxing Authorities Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 $1,603 $1,556 – 184 (3) (60) (914) $ 810 7 173 – (1) (132) $1,603 Substantially all of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 3015, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. As of June 30, 2015 and 2014, the amounts accrued for interest and penalties totaled $62,000 and $309,000, respectively, and are not included in the reconciliation above. 60 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTO. Contingencies The Company is involved in litigation of which the ultimate outcome and liability to the Company, if any, are not presently determinable. Management believes that final disposition of such litigation will not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows, either individually or in the aggregate. P. Restructuring of Operations During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company committed to a restructuring plan to reduce costs and improve efficiencies at its North American manufacturing operations. This restructuring resulted in a reduction of 79 people through a combination of early retirement and reduction in force. The restructuring was meant to be a proactive measure to offset the impact low oil and gas prices had on the demand from its customers. The Company recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $3,282,000 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, upon announcement of the intended restructuring action. During fiscal 2015, the Company made no cash payments, resulting in an accrual balance of $3,282,000 at June 30, 2015. During fiscal 2014, the Company recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $961,000 representing the incremental cost above the minimum legal indemnity for a targeted workforce reduction at its Belgian operation, following finalization of negotiations with the local labor unions. The minimum legal indemnity of $548,000 was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, upon announcement of the intended restructuring action. During fiscal 2014, the Company made cash payments of $857,000, resulting in an accrual balance at June 30, 2014 of $785,000. The Company made additional payments of $156,000 during fiscal 2015, resulting in a June 30, 2015 balance of $494,000 after a foreign exchange impact of $135,000. This remaining obligation relates to increased pension benefits agreed to as part of the restructuring and is expected to be paid out over the next several years. Twin Disc, Incorporated and Subsidiaries Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands) Description 2015: Allowance for losses on accounts receivable Deferred tax valuation allowance 2014: Allowance for losses on accounts receivable Deferred tax valuation allowance 2013: Allowance for losses on accounts receivable Deferred tax valuation allowance Additions Balance at Beginning of Period Charged to Costs and Expenses Net Acquired Deductions1 Balance at End of Period $3,637 $5,593 $2,884 $3,724 $2,194 $3,811 $ 304 $ 805 $1,169 $2,140 $1,385 $1,112 $ – $ – $ – $ – $ – $ – $1,758 $2,821 $ 416 $ 271 $ 695 $1,1992 $2,183 $3,577 $3,637 $5,593 $2,884 $3,724 1 Activity primarily represents amounts written-off during the year, along with other adjustments (primarily foreign currency translation adjustments). 2 Represents adjustments resulting from foreign tax audits. 61 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDSignatures Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. September 14, 2015 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED By: /s/ JOHN H. BATTEN John H. Batten President and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. September 14, 2015 September 14, 2015 September 14, 2015 September 14, 2015 September 14, 2015 By: /s/ DAVID B. RAYBURN David B. Rayburn Chairman of the Board By: /s/ JOHN H. BATTEN John H. Batten President and Chief Executive Officer By: /s/ JEFFREY S. KNUTSON Jeffrey S. Knutson Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary By: /s/ DEBBIE A. LANGE Debbie A. Lange Corporate Controller (Chief Accounting Officer) Michael Doar, Director Janet P. Giesselman, Director Michael C. Smiley, Director Harold M. Stratton II, Director David R. Zimmer, Director By: /s/ JEFFREY S. KNUTSON Jeffrey S. Knutson Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (Attorney in Fact) 62 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTIncluded Herewith Included Herewith Exhibit Index Twin Disc, Incorporated 10-K for Year Ended June 30, 2015 Exhibit Description 3a) 3b) 4a) 4b) Restated Articles of Incorporation of Twin Disc, Incorporated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8 K dated December 6, 2007). File No. 001-07635. Restated Bylaws of Twin Disc, Incorporated, as amended through January 19, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8 K dated December 17, 2013). File No. 001-07635. Description of Shareholder Rights Plan and Form of Rights Agreement dated as of December 20, 2007 by and between the Company and Mellon Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent, with Form of Rights Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Item 3.03 and Exhibit 4 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 20, 2007). File No. 001-07635. First Amendment to Rights Agreement, effective as of May 1, 2012, between Twin Disc, Incorporated and Computershare Shareowner Services, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 1, 2012). File No. 001-07635. Exhibit 10 Material Contracts a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) j) k) Director Tenure and Retirement Policy (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10a of the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed September 19, 2011 for the year ended June 30, 2011). File No. 001-07635. The 2004 Stock Incentive Plan as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit B of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on October 20, 2006). File No. 001-07635. The 2004 Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007). File No. 001-07635. The Amended and Restated Twin Disc, Incorporated 2010 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 5, 2015). File No. 001-07635. The 2010 Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (Incorporated by reference to Appendix B of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on October 15, 2010). File No. 001-07635. Form of Performance Stock Award Grant Agreement for award of performance shares on July 25, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 31, 2013). File No. 001-07635. Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement for award of performance stock units on July 25, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 31, 2013). File No. 001-07635. Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement for restricted stock grants on July 25, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 31, 2013). File No. 001-07635. Form of Performance Stock Award Grant Agreement for award of performance shares on July 30, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 5, 2014). File No. 001-07635. Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement for award of performance stock units on July 30, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 5, 2014). File No. 001-07635. Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement for restricted stock grants on July 30, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 5, 2014). File No. 001-07635. 63 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDExhibit Index Twin Disc, Incorporated 10-K for Year Ended June 30, 2015 Exhibit 10 Material Contracts l) m) n) o) p) q) r) s) t) Form of Performance Stock Award Grant Agreement for award of performance shares on July 31, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 5, 2015). File No. 001-07635. Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement for restricted stock grants on July 31, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 5, 2015). File No. 001-07635. Twin Disc, Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, amended and restated as of July 29, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 4, 2010). File No. 001-07635. Forms of Change in Control Severance Agreements (Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.4, 10.5 and 10.6 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 5, 2014). File No. 001-07635. Form of Indemnity Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 2, 2005). File No. 001-07635. Credit Agreement Between Twin Disc, Incorporated, Twin Disc International, S.A., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated June 30, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 3, 2014). File No. 001-07635. Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement Between Twin Disc, Incorporated, Prudential Investment Management, Inc., The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Pruco Life Insurance Company, Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, Security Benefit Life Insurance Company, Inc., Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation, and Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, dated June 30, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 3, 2014). File No. 001-07635. August 3, 2015 Amendment to Credit Agreement Between Twin Disc, Incorporated, Twin Disc International, S.A., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated June 30, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 5, 2015). File No. 001-07635. August 3, 2015 Amendment to Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement Between Twin Disc, Incorporated, Prudential Investment Management, Inc., The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Pruco Life Insurance Company, Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, Security Benefit Life Insurance Company, Inc., Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation, and Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 5, 2015). File No. 001-07635. Exhibit Description 21 23 24 31a 31b 32a 32b Subsidiaries of the Registrant Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Power of Attorney Certification Certification Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Included Herewith Included Herewith X X X X X X X 64 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTExhibit 21 Subsidiaries Of The Registrant Twin Disc, Incorporated, the registrant (a Wisconsin Corporation) owns directly or indirectly 100% of the following subsidiaries: 1. Twin Disc International, S.P.R.L. (a Belgian corporation) 2. Twin Disc Srl (an Italian corporation) 3. Rolla Sp Propellers SA (a Swiss corporation) 4. Twin Disc (Pacific) Pty. Ltd. (an Australian corporation) 5. Twin Disc (Far East) Ltd. (a Delaware corporation operating in Singapore and Hong Kong) 6. Twin Disc (Far East) Pte. Ltd. (a Singapore corporation) 7. Mill Log Equipment Co., Inc. (an Oregon corporation) 8. Mill-Log Marine, Inc. (an Oregon Corporation) 9. Mill-Log Wilson Equipment Ltd. (a Canadian corporation) 10. Twin Disc Southeast, Inc. (a Florida corporation) 11. Twin Disc Japan (a Japanese corporation) 12. Twin Disc Power Transmission Private, Ltd. (an Indian limited liability corporation) 13. Twin Disc Power Transmission (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (a Chinese corporation) Twin Disc, Incorporated also owns 66% of Twin Disc Nico Co. LTD. (a Japanese corporation). The registrant has neither a parent nor any other subsidiaries. All of the above subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements. Exhibit 23 Consent Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S 8 (Nos. 333-99229, 333-119770, 333-169965, 333-169963 and 333-169962) of Twin Disc, Incorporated of our report dated September 14, 2015 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10 K. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Milwaukee, Wisconsin September 14, 2015 65 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATEDExhibit 24 Power Of Attorney The undersigned directors of Twin Disc, Incorporated hereby severally constitute John H. Batten and Jeffrey S. Knutson, and each of them singly, true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them, singly, to sign for us and in our names as directors the Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and generally do all such things in our names and behalf as directors to enable Twin Disc, Incorporated to comply with the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures so they may be signed by our attorneys, or either of them, as set forth below. /s/ MICHAEL DOAR Michael Doar, Director /s/ JANET P. GIESSELMAN Janet P. Giesselman, Director /s/ DAVID B. RAYBURN David B. Rayburn, Director /s/ MICHAEL C. SMILEY Michael C. Smiley, Director /s/ HAROLD M. STRATTON II Harold M. Stratton II, Director /s/ DAVID R. ZIMMER David R. Zimmer, Director July 31, 2015 66 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORTExhibit 31A Certifications I, John H. Batten, certify that: I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Twin Disc, Incorporated; 1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 3. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 14, 2015 By: /s/ JOHN H. BATTEN John H. Batten President and Chief Executive Officer 67 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED Exhibit 31B Certifications I, Jeffrey S. Knutson, certify that: I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Twin Disc, Incorporated; 1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 3. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 14, 2015 /s/ JEFFREY S. KNUTSON Jeffrey S. Knutson Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary 68 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORT Exhibit 32A Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Twin Disc, Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John H. Batten, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: September 14, 2015 By: /s/ JOHN H. BATTEN John H. Batten President and Chief Executive Officer Exhibit 32B Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Twin Disc, Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey S. Knutson, Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: September 14, 2015 /s/ JEFFREY S. KNUTSON Jeffrey S. Knutson Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary 69 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 5-Year Financial Summary (In thousands, except where noted) STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) Net sales $265,790 $263,909 $285,282 $355,870 $310,393 Cost and expenses, including marketing, engineering and administrative 250,304 255,022 275,269 310,999 275,677 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 Earnings from operations Other income (expense) Earnings before income taxes and noncontrolling interest Income taxes Noncontrolling interest Net earnings attributable to Twin Disc BALANCE SHEET Assets Cash Trade receivables, net Inventories Other current assets Total current assets Goodwill and other assets Property, plant and equipment, net Total assets Liabilities and Equity Current liabilities Long-term debt Deferred liabilities Total equity Noncontrolling interest Total liabilities and equity Comparative Financial Information Per share statistics: Basic earnings Diluted earnings Dividends Total equity Return on equity Return on assets Return on sales Average basic shares outstanding Average diluted shares outstanding Number of shareholder accounts Number of employees Additions to property, plant and equipment Depreciation Net working capital 70 15,486 414 15,900 4,515 (212) 11,173 22,936 43,883 80,241 22,770 8,887 (791) 8,096 4,226 (226) 3,644 10,013 44,871 (776) 9,237 4,986 (369) 3,882 (115) 44,756 17,815 (198) 26,743 24,757 40,219 97,579 17,542 20,724 46,331 15,701 63,438 102,774 103,178 18,643 14,844 34,716 (2,687) 32,029 13,897 (135) 17,997 20,167 61,007 99,139 14,855 169,830 180,097 188,472 197,161 195,168 23,605 56,427 26,621 60,267 34,671 62,315 40,315 66,356 48,161 65,791 249,862 266,985 285,458 303,832 309,120 57,054 10,231 42,410 56,980 14,800 42,894 63,503 23,472 54,921 66,625 28,401 72,297 84,660 25,784 62,030 139,528 151,584 142,504 135,487 135,677 639 727 1,058 1,022 969 249,862 266,985 285,458 303,832 309,120 0.99 0.99 0.36 0.32 0.32 0.36 0.34 0.34 0.36 2.34 2.31 0.34 1.59 1.57 0.30 12.38 13.46 12.61 11.88 11.99 8.0% 4.5% 4.2% 2.4% 1.4% 1.4% 2.7% 1.4% 1.4% 19.7% 8.6% 7.5% 13.3% 5.8% 5.8% 11,273,697 11,258,342 11,304,280 11,409,467 11,319,081 11,277,364 11,264,421 11,377,091 11,555,561 11,462,562 530 921 9,049 9,922 580 970 7,245 10,180 617 990 6,582 10,120 651 1,029 13,733 9,947 699 941 12,028 9,110 112,776 123,117 124,969 130,536 111,208 TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED 2015 ANNUAL REPORT MICHAEL E. BATTEN Fiscal 2015 saw the passing of our beloved Chairman, Michael E. Batten. Mike began his career at Twin Disc in 1970 as a Financial Analyst, advancing through a number of positions to eventually become Chief Executive Officer, a position he held for more than 30 years. Mike retired from the Company in 2013, and became non-executive Chairman of the Board. During his 43 years of service, Mike managed the company through various business cycles. From global recessions through times of prosperity, Mike worked tirelessly to ensure that Twin Disc was always well positioned in its markets for the economic situation at hand, in order to ensure the success of the company. Mike’s leadership and guidance inspired all who knew him. An astute global businessman, his honesty, integrity and kindness were respected worldwide. Mike always found time to listen — whether to our customers, our employees or those in our community. He was knowledgeable and respectful of all cultures and was truly a global citizen. TWIN DISC OFFICERS TWIN DISC BOARD OF DIRECTORS John H. Batten President and Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey S. Knutson Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary Malcolm F. Moore Executive Vice President – Operations Dean J. Bratel Vice President – Global Sales and Marketing Michael B. Gee Vice President – Corporate Engineering Denise L. Wilcox Vice President – Human Resources Debbie A. Lange Corporate Controller Michael C. Smiley Chief Financial Officer Zebra Technologies Corporation (A global provider of asset management solutions) Lincolnshire, Illinois Harold M. Stratton II Chairman of the Board and retired Chief Executive Officer Strattec Security Corporation (A manufacturer of security and access control products for the global automotive industry) Milwaukee, Wisconsin David R. Zimmer Retired Managing Partner Stonebridge Equity, LLC (A merger, acquisition and finance value consulting firm) Troy, Michigan David B. Rayburn Chairman Retired President and Chief Executive Officer Modine Manufacturing Company (A manufacturer of heat exchange equipment) Racine, Wisconsin John H. Batten President and Chief Executive Officer Twin Disc, Inc. Racine, Wisconsin Michael Doar Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Hurco Companies, Inc. (A global manufacturer of machine tools) Indianapolis, Indiana Janet P. Giesselman Retired President and General Manager Dow Oil & Gas Company (A business unit of The Dow Chemical Company) 1 3 2 8 R a c i n e S t r e e t R a c i n e , W i s c o n s i n 5 3 4 0 3 U S A w w w . t w i n d i s c . c o m
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above