UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
(Mark One)
[X]
[ ]
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to ____________
Commission File Number 1-6075
UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
UTAH
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
13-2626465
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
1400 DOUGLAS STREET, OMAHA, NEBRASKA
(Address of principal executive offices)
68179
(Zip Code)
(402) 544-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each Class
Common Stock (Par Value $2.50 per share)
Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.
Yes (cid:31) No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of
the Act.
(cid:31) Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
Yes (cid:31) No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website,
if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such files).
Yes (cid:31) No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this
chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and
“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer (cid:31) Non-accelerated filer (cid:31) Smaller reporting company (cid:31)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
(cid:31) Yes No
As of June 28, 2013, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates (using the
New York Stock Exchange closing price) was $71.3 billion.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock as of January 31, 2014 was 455,057,609.
Documents Incorporated by Reference – Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 15, 2014, are incorporated by reference into Part III of
this report. The registrant’s Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Regulation 14A.
UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CEO’s Letter ........................................................................................................... 3
Directors and Senior Management ......................................................................... 4
PART I
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Business ................................................................................................................. 5
Risk Factors ............................................................................................................ 10
Unresolved Staff Comments ................................................................................... 13
Properties ................................................................................................................ 14
Legal Proceedings .................................................................................................. 17
Mine Safety Disclosures ......................................................................................... 18
Executive Officers of the Registrant and Principal Executive
Officers of Subsidiaries ..................................................................................... 19
Item 5.
Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related
PART II
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Item 15.
Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities .................... 20
Selected Financial Data .......................................................................................... 22
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations ................................................................ 23
Critical Accounting Policies ..................................................................................... 41
Cautionary Information ............................................................................................ 46
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk .................................. 47
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ...................................................... 48
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm .................................... 49
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure ................................................................ 83
Controls and Procedures ........................................................................................ 83
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting ........................................................................................... 84
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm .................................... 85
Other Information .................................................................................................... 86
PART III
Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance ..................................... 86
Executive Compensation ........................................................................................ 86
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters ............................................... 87
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and
Director Independence ..................................................................................... 87
Principal Accountant Fees and Services ................................................................. 87
PART IV
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules ................................................................ 88
Signatures ............................................................................................................... 89
Certifications ........................................................................................................... 99
2
Fellow Shareholders:
February 7, 2014
2013 was another tremendous year for Union Pacific, with our overall financial performance exceeding all
previous milestones. The year was a testament to the strength and diversity of our franchise and the
dedication and commitment of our employees. We achieved record earnings of $9.42 per share, driven
by a best-ever operating ratio of 66.1 percent. As a result, our return on invested capital* of 14.7 percent
also hit an all-time high, while free cash flow* exceeded the $2 billion mark. Shareholders were rewarded
with increased financial returns, including a 19 percent increase in dividends declared per share
compared to 2012 and $2.2 billion in share repurchases, up 50 percent from 2012. UP’s stock price
reached new highs in 2013, increasing 34 percent, and outpaced the S&P 500 by 4 percentage points.
Despite the challenges from a significantly weaker coal market and the carry-over impact of the 2012
drought on our grain shipments, other markets within our diverse portfolio of business, including
automotive, base chemicals, shale-related moves, construction-related shipments, and domestic
intermodal traffic were positive. Operationally, we successfully managed the shifts in business mix,
improved network efficiency and fluidity, and operated a safe railroad.
Excellent service is the key to our future success. It provides the value that attracts and retains our
customers, supports our pricing initiatives, and improves resource utilization. It also demonstrates the
power of our value proposition to new customers that are looking for viable transportation alternatives.
But, above all, it is our unrelenting focus on safety that serves as the foundation for everything we do.
With our Total Safety Culture and The UP Way instilled throughout the Company, employee injuries hit a
near-record low in 2013. We’re proud of the significant improvement we’ve made, lowering our personal
injury rate more than 45 percent over the past decade. As proud as we are of these results, the most
important numbers are zero fatalities and zero injuries, which is our ultimate goal.
Our capital investments play a critical role in meeting the long-term demand for freight transportation in
the U.S. In 2013, we invested $3.6 billion across our network. Over half was spent on replacing and
hardening our infrastructure to further enhance safety and reliability. The balance was invested to
increase customer value, support business growth, and continue development of Positive Train Control
(PTC), a federally mandated program. Although we achieved best-ever financial returns to support these
investments, our returns must continue to improve to support higher asset replacement costs and our
safety, service, and growth initiatives.
In an evolving marketplace, our diverse franchise is unparalleled in the industry today. Supporting six
strong business groups, it remains an absolute core strength of Union Pacific. An increasing U.S.
population base will stimulate long-term growth for many of the goods we carry. To meet this growing
demand, we anticipate continued opportunities to convert freight from the highway, supported by our
integrated network, competitive service offerings, and environmental advantages. Global population
growth will also stimulate world food demand. Union Pacific plays a vital role in the supply chains for
domestic and export grain, supporting our country’s position as the top global corn producer.
With a resurging chemical industry fueled by low natural gas prices and continued strength in the
construction and housing markets, Union Pacific’s manifest network is well positioned to meet the
growing demand for various chemical and industrial products. In addition, UP is the only railroad that
serves all six major gateways to Mexico. We are in an excellent position to benefit from economic growth
in that country. Union Pacific currently touches more than two-thirds of the goods moving cross-border by
rail and is uniquely poised to accommodate forecasted growth in Mexico automotive production and
manufacturing activity.
We will build on these strengths and opportunities for profitable growth in the future, while continuing our
unrelenting focus on both safety and service for our customers. We strongly believe in the power and
potential of the Union Pacific franchise to drive even greater performance on all fronts and increase
shareholder returns in the years to come.
President & Chief Executive Officer
3
*See Item 7 of this report for reconciliations to U.S. GAAP.
DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Andrew H. Card, Jr.
Executive Director of the
Office of the Provost and
Vice President of Academic
Affairs,
Texas A&M University
Board Committees: Audit, Finance
Erroll B. Davis, Jr.
Superintendent
Atlanta Public Schools
Board Committees: Compensation
and Benefits (Chair), Corporate
Governance and Nominating
Thomas J. Donohue
President and
Chief Executive Officer
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Board Committees: Compensation
and Benefits, Corporate Governance
and Nominating
Archie W. Dunham
Retired Chairman
ConocoPhillips
Board Committees: Corporate
Governance and Nominating,
Finance
SENIOR MANAGEMENT
John J. Koraleski
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Union Pacific Corporation and
Chief Executive Officer
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Lance M. Fritz
President and
Chief Operating Officer
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Eric L. Butler
Executive Vice President-
Marketing and Sales
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Diane K. Duren
Executive Vice President and
Corporate Secretary
Union Pacific Corporation
Mary Sanders Jones
Vice President and Treasurer
Union Pacific Corporation
Thomas F. McLarty III
President
McLarty Associates
Board Committees: Compensation
and Benefits, Corporate Governance
and Nominating
Steven R. Rogel
Retired Chairman
Weyerhaeuser Company
Lead Independent Director
Board Committees: Compensation
and Benefits, Corporate Governance
and Nominating (Chair)
Jose H. Villarreal
Advisor
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer &
Feld, LLP
Board Committees: Audit,
Compensation and Benefits
James R. Young
Chairman
Union Pacific Corporation and
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Judith Richards Hope
Emerita Professor of Law and
Distinguished Visitor from Practice
Georgetown University Law Center
Board Committees: Corporate
Governance and Nominating,
Finance
John J. Koraleski
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Union Pacific Corporation and
Chief Executive Officer
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Charles C. Krulak
General, USMC, Ret.
President
Birmingham – Southern College
Board Committees: Audit, Finance
Michael R. McCarthy
Chairman
McCarthy Group, LLC
Board Committees: Audit,
Finance (Chair)
Michael W. McConnell
General Partner and
Former Managing Partner
Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.
Board Committees: Audit (Chair),
Finance
D. Lynn Kelley
Vice President–Supply and
Continuous Improvement
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cameron A. Scott
Executive Vice President –
Operations
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Robert M. Knight, Jr.
Executive Vice President–Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
Union Pacific Corporation
Joseph E. O’Connor, Jr.
Vice President–Labor Relations
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Patrick J. O’Malley
Vice President–Taxes and General
Tax Counsel
Union Pacific Corporation
Michael A. Rock
Vice President–External Relations
Union Pacific Corporation
Lynden L. Tennison
Senior Vice President and
Chief Information Officer
Union Pacific Corporation
Gayla L. Thal
Senior Vice President–Law
and General Counsel
Union Pacific Corporation
Jeffrey P. Totusek
Vice President and Controller
Union Pacific Corporation
Robert W. Turner
Senior Vice President–
Corporate Relations
Union Pacific Corporation
4
Item 1. Business
GENERAL
PART I
Union Pacific Railroad is the principal operating company of Union Pacific Corporation. One of America's
most recognized companies, Union Pacific Railroad links 23 states in the western two-thirds of the
country by rail, providing a critical link in the global supply chain. The Railroad’s diversified business mix
includes Agricultural Products, Automotive, Chemicals, Coal, Industrial Products and Intermodal. Union
Pacific serves many of the fastest-growing U.S. population centers, operates from all major West Coast
and Gulf Coast ports to eastern gateways, connects with Canada's rail systems and is the only railroad
serving all six major Mexico gateways. Union Pacific provides value to its roughly 10,000 customers by
delivering products in a safe, reliable, fuel-efficient and environmentally responsible manner.
Union Pacific Corporation was incorporated in Utah in 1969 and maintains its principal executive offices
at 1400 Douglas Street, Omaha, NE 68179. The telephone number at that address is (402) 544-5000.
The common stock of Union Pacific Corporation is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under
the symbol “UNP”.
For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to “UPC”,
“Corporation”, “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our” shall mean Union Pacific Corporation and its subsidiaries,
including Union Pacific Railroad Company, which we separately refer to as “UPRR” or the “Railroad”.
Available Information – Our Internet website is www.up.com. We make available free of charge on our
website (under the “Investors” caption link) our Annual Reports on Form 10-K; our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q; eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) documents; our current reports on Form 8-
K; our proxy statements; Forms 3, 4, and 5, filed on behalf of our directors and certain executive officers;
and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act). We provide these reports and statements as soon as reasonably
practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). We also make available on our website previously filed SEC reports and exhibits via
a link to EDGAR on the SEC’s Internet site at www.sec.gov. Additionally, our corporate governance
materials, including By-Laws, Board Committee charters, governance guidelines and policies, and codes
of conduct and ethics for directors, officers, and employees are available on our website. From time to
time, the corporate governance materials on our website may be updated as necessary to comply with
rules issued by the SEC and the NYSE or as desirable to promote the effective and efficient governance
of our company. Any security holder wishing to receive, without charge, a copy of any of our SEC filings
or corporate governance materials should send a written request to: Secretary, Union Pacific Corporation,
1400 Douglas Street, Omaha, NE 68179.
We have included the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) certifications
regarding our public disclosure required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibits
31(a) and (b) to this report.
References to our website address in this report, including references in Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7, are provided as a convenience and do
not constitute, and should not be deemed, an incorporation by reference of the information contained on,
or available through, the website. Therefore, such information should not be considered part of this report.
OPERATIONS
The Railroad, along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates, is our one reportable operating segment.
Although we provide revenue by commodity group, we analyze the net financial results of the Railroad as
one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network. Additional information regarding our
business and operations, including revenue and financial information and data and other information
regarding environmental matters, is presented in Risk Factors, Item 1A; Legal Proceedings, Item 3;
Selected Financial Data, Item 6; Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations, Item 7; and the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8 (which
include information regarding revenues, statements of income, and total assets).
5
2013 Freight Revenue
Operations – UPRR is a Class I railroad
operating in the U.S. We have 31,838 route
miles, linking Pacific Coast and Gulf Coast
ports with the Midwest and eastern U.S.
gateways and providing several corridors to
key Mexican gateways. We serve the western
two-thirds of
the country and maintain
coordinated schedules with other rail carriers
to move freight to and from the Atlantic Coast,
the Pacific Coast,
the
Southwest, Canada, and Mexico. Export and
import traffic moves through Gulf Coast and
Pacific Coast ports and across the Mexican
and Canadian borders. Our freight traffic
consists of bulk, manifest, and premium
business. Bulk traffic primarily consists of coal, grain, soda ash, rock and crude oil shipped in unit trains –
trains transporting a single commodity from one source to one destination. Manifest traffic includes
individual carload or less than train-load business involving commodities such as lumber, steel, paper,
food and chemicals. The transportation of finished vehicles, auto parts, intermodal containers and truck
trailers are included as part of our premium business. In 2013, we generated freight revenues totaling
$20.7 billion from the following six commodity groups:
the Southeast,
Agricultural – Transportation of grains, commodities produced from these grains, and food and beverage
products generated 16% of the Railroad’s 2013 freight revenue. The Company accesses most major
grain markets, linking the Midwest and western U.S. producing areas to export terminals in the Pacific
Northwest and Gulf Coast ports, as well as Mexico. We also serve significant domestic markets, including
grain processors, animal feeders and ethanol producers in the Midwest, West, South and Rocky
Mountain states. Unit trains, which transport a single commodity between producers and export terminals
or domestic markets, represent approximately 36% of our agricultural shipments.
Automotive – We are the largest automotive carrier west of the Mississippi River and operate or access
over 40 vehicle distribution centers. The Railroad’s extensive franchise serves vehicle assembly plants
and connects to West Coast ports and the Gulf of Mexico to accommodate both import and export
shipments. In addition to transporting finished vehicles, UP provides expedited handling of automotive
parts in both boxcars and intermodal containers destined for Mexico, the U.S. and Canada. The
automotive group generated 10% of Union Pacific’s freight revenue in 2013.
Chemicals – Transporting chemicals generated 17% of our freight revenue in 2013. The Railroad’s
unique franchise serves the chemical producing areas along the Gulf Coast, where roughly two-thirds of
the Company’s chemical business originates, terminates or travels. Our chemical franchise also accesses
chemical producers in the Rocky Mountains and on the West Coast. The Company’s chemical shipments
include four broad categories: Petrochemicals, Fertilizer, Soda Ash, and Other. Petrochemicals include
industrial chemicals, plastics and petroleum products, including crude oil and liquid petroleum gases.
Currently, these products move primarily to and from the Gulf Coast region. Fertilizer movements
originate in the Gulf Coast region, the western U.S. and Canada (through interline access) for delivery to
major agricultural users in the Midwest, western U.S., as well as abroad. Soda ash originates in
southwestern Wyoming and California, destined for chemical and glass producing markets in North
America and abroad. Other shipments include sodium products, phosphorus rock and sulfur.
Coal – Shipments of coal and petroleum coke accounted for 19% of our freight revenue in 2013. The
Railroad’s network supports the transportation of coal and petroleum coke to independent and regulated
power companies and industrial facilities throughout the U.S. Through interchange gateways and ports,
UP’s reach extends to eastern U.S. utilities, Mexico, Europe and Asia. Water terminals allow the Railroad
to move western U.S. coal east via the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers, as well as the Great Lakes. Export
coal moves through West Coast ports to Asia and through the Mississippi River and Houston to Europe.
Coal traffic originating in the Southern Powder River Basin (SPRB) area of Wyoming is the largest
segment of UP’s coal business.
Industrial Products – Our extensive network facilitates the movement of numerous commodities between
thousands of origin and destination points throughout North America. The Industrial Products group
consists of several categories, including construction products, minerals, consumer goods, metals,
6
lumber, paper, and other miscellaneous products. In 2013, this group generated 18% of Union Pacific’s
total freight revenue. Commercial, residential and governmental infrastructure investments drive
shipments of steel, aggregates (cement components), cement and wood products. Oil and gas drilling
generates demand for raw steel, finished pipe, frac sand, stone and drilling fluid commodities. Industrial
and light manufacturing plants receive steel, nonferrous materials, minerals and other raw materials.
Paper and packaging commodities, as well as appliances, move to major metropolitan areas for
consumers. Lumber shipments originate primarily in the Pacific Northwest and western Canada and move
throughout the U.S. for use in new home construction and repair and remodeling.
Intermodal – Our Intermodal business includes two segments: international and domestic. International
business consists of import and export container traffic that mainly passes through West Coast ports
served by UP’s extensive terminal network. Domestic business includes container and trailer traffic picked
up and delivered within North America for intermodal marketing companies (primarily shipper agents and
logistics companies), as well as truckload carriers. Less-than-truckload and package carriers with time-
sensitive business requirements are also an important part of domestic shipments. Together, international
and domestic business generated 20% of UP’s 2013 freight revenue.
Seasonality – Some of the commodities we carry have peak shipping seasons, reflecting either or both
the nature of the commodity, such as certain agricultural and food products that have specific growing
and harvesting seasons, and the demand cycle for the commodity, such as intermodal traffic, which
generally has a peak shipping season during the third quarter to meet holiday-related demand for
consumer goods during the fourth quarter. The peak shipping seasons for these commodities can vary
considerably from year to year depending upon various factors, including the strength of domestic and
international economies and currencies and the strength of harvests and market prices for agricultural
products. In response to an annual request delivered by the Surface Transportation Board (STB) of the
U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to all of the Class I railroads operating in the U.S., we issue a
publicly available letter during the third quarter detailing our plans for handling traffic during the third and
fourth quarters and providing other information requested by the STB.
Working Capital – At December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had a modest working capital surplus, which
provides enhanced liquidity. In addition, we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet
any foreseeable cash requirements, and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current
liabilities.
Competition – We are subject to competition from other railroads, motor carriers, ship and barge
operators, and pipelines. Our main railroad competitor is Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC. Its primary
subsidiary, BNSF Railway Company (BNSF), operates parallel routes in many of our main traffic
corridors. In addition, we operate in corridors served by other railroads and motor carriers. Motor carrier
competition exists for five of our six commodity groups (excluding most coal shipments). Because of the
proximity of our routes to major inland and Gulf Coast waterways, barges can be particularly competitive,
especially for grain and bulk commodities in certain areas where we operate. In addition to price
competition, we face competition with respect to transit times, quality and reliability of service from motor
carriers and other railroads. Motor carriers in particular can have an advantage over railroads with respect
to transit times and timeliness of service. However, railroads are much more fuel efficient than trucks,
which reduces the impact of transporting goods on the environment and public infrastructure, and
railroads operating in the U.S., including us, have been making efforts to convert certain traffic from motor
carriers to railroad service. Additionally, we must build or acquire and maintain our rail system; trucks and
barges are able to use public rights-of-way maintained by public entities. Any of the following could also
affect the competitiveness of our transportation services for some or all of our commodities: (i)
improvements or expenditures materially increasing the quality or reducing the costs of these alternative
modes of transportation, (ii) legislation that eliminates or significantly reduces the size or weight
limitations applied to motor carriers, or (iii) legislation or regulatory changes that impose operating
restrictions on railroads or that adversely affect the profitability of some or all railroad traffic. For more
information regarding risks we face from competition, see the Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report.
Key Suppliers – We depend on two key domestic suppliers of high horsepower locomotives. Due to the
capital intensive nature of the locomotive manufacturing business and sophistication of this equipment,
potential new suppliers face high barriers of entry into this industry. Therefore, if one of these domestic
suppliers discontinues manufacturing locomotives for any reason, including insolvency or bankruptcy, we
could experience a significant cost increase and risk reduced availability of the locomotives that are
necessary to our operations. Additionally, for a high percentage of our rail purchases, we utilize two steel
7
producers (one domestic and one international) that meet our specifications. Rail is critical for both
maintenance of our network and replacement and improvement or expansion of our network and facilities.
Rail manufacturing also has high barriers of entry, and, if one of those suppliers discontinues operations
for any reason, including insolvency or bankruptcy, we could experience cost increases and difficulty
obtaining rail.
Employees – Approximately 86% of our 46,445 full-time-equivalent employees are represented by 14
major rail unions. In 2012, we concluded the most recent round of negotiations, which began in 2010, with
the ratification of new agreements by several unions. All of the unions executed similar multi-year
agreements that provide for higher employee cost sharing of employee health and welfare benefits and
higher wages. The current agreements will remain in effect until renegotiated under provisions of the
Railway Labor Act. The next round of negotiations will begin in early 2015.
Railroad Security – Our security efforts rely upon a wide variety of measures including employee
training, cooperation with our customers, training of emergency responders, and partnerships with
numerous federal, state, and local government agencies. While federal law requires us to protect the
confidentiality of our security plans designed to safeguard against terrorism and other security incidents,
the following provides a general overview of our security initiatives.
UPRR Security Measures – We maintain a comprehensive security plan designed to both deter and to
respond to any potential or actual threats as they arise. The plan includes four levels of alert status, each
with its own set of countermeasures. We employ our own police force, consisting of more than 200
commissioned and highly-trained officers. Our employees also undergo recurrent security and
preparedness training, as well as federally-mandated hazardous materials and security training. We
regularly review the sufficiency of our employee training programs. We maintain the capability to move
critical operations to back-up facilities in different locations.
We have an emergency response management center, which operates 24 hours a day. The center
receives reports of emergencies, dangerous or potentially dangerous conditions, and other safety and
security issues from our employees, the public, and law enforcement and other government officials. In
cooperation with government officials, we monitor both threats and public events, and, as necessary, we
may alter rail traffic flow at times of concern to minimize risk to communities and our operations. We
comply with the hazardous materials routing rules and other requirements imposed by federal law. We
also design our operating plan to expedite the movement of hazardous material shipments to minimize
the time rail cars remain idle at yards and terminals located in or near major population centers.
Additionally, in compliance with Transportation Security Agency regulations, we deployed information
systems and instructed employees in tracking and documenting the handoff of Rail Security Sensitive
Material with customers and interchange partners.
We also have established a number of our own innovative safety and security-oriented initiatives ranging
from various investments in technology to The Officer on the Train program, which provides local law
enforcement officers with the opportunity to ride with train crews to enhance their understanding of
railroad operations and risks. Our staff of information security professionals continually assesses cyber
security risks and implements mitigation programs that evolve with the changing technology threat
environment. To date, we have not experienced any material disruption of our operations due to a cyber
threat or attack directed at us.
Cooperation with Federal, State, and Local Government Agencies – We work closely on physical and
cyber security initiatives with government agencies that include the DOT and the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) as well as local police departments, fire departments, and other first
responders. In conjunction with DOT, DHS, and other railroads, we sponsor Operation Respond, which
provides first responders with secure links to electronic railroad resources, including mapping systems,
shipment records, and other essential information required by emergency personnel to respond to
accidents and other situations. We also participate in the National Joint Terrorism Task Force, a multi-
agency effort established by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to
combat and prevent terrorism.
We work with the Coast Guard, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and the Military Transport
Management Command, which monitor shipments entering the UPRR rail network at U.S. border
crossings and ports. We were the first railroad in the U.S. to be named a partner in CBP’s Customs-
8
Trade Partnership Against Terrorism, a partnership designed to develop, enhance, and maintain effective
security processes throughout the global supply chain.
Cooperation with Customers and Trade Associations – Along with other railroads, we work with the
American Chemistry Council to train approximately 200,000 emergency responders annually. We work
with many of our chemical shippers to establish plant security plans, and we continue to take steps to
more closely monitor and track hazardous materials shipments. In cooperation with the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) and other interested groups, we are also working to develop additional
improvements to tank car design that will further limit the risk of releases of hazardous materials.
GOVERNMENTAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
Governmental Regulation – Our operations are subject to a variety of federal, state, and local
regulations, generally applicable to all businesses. (See also the discussion of certain regulatory
proceedings in Legal Proceedings, Item 3.)
The operations of the Railroad are also subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the STB. The STB has
jurisdiction over rates charged on certain regulated rail traffic; common carrier service of regulated traffic;
freight car compensation; transfer, extension, or abandonment of rail lines; and acquisition of control of
rail common carriers. In 2013, the STB continued its efforts to explore whether to expand rail regulation.
The STB has requested parties to submit studies that describe and quantify the potential impact of
expanded reciprocal switching or trackage rights arrangements on railroads. For the past several
legislative sessions, proposed bills have been introduced in Congress that aim to alter the regulatory
structure of the railroad industry. We will continue to monitor any legislative activity involving rail and
transportation regulation and respond accordingly.
The operations of the Railroad also are subject to the regulations of the FRA and other federal and state
agencies. On January 12, 2010, the FRA issued initial rules governing installation of Positive Train
Control (PTC) by the end of 2015. The final regulation is still forthcoming. Although still under
development, PTC is a collision avoidance technology intended to override engineer controlled
locomotives and stop a train before an accident. Following the issuance of the initial rules, the FRA
acknowledged that projected costs will exceed projected benefits by a ratio of at least 22 to one, and we
estimate that our costs will be higher than those assumed by the FRA. In August 2012, the FRA provided
Congress with a status report regarding implementation of PTC. This report indicated that the rail industry
will likely achieve only partial deployment of PTC by the current deadline due to significant technical and
other issues. Through 2013, we have invested over $1.2 billion in the development of PTC.
DOT, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration and DHS, along with other federal agencies, have jurisdiction over certain aspects of
safety, movement of hazardous materials and hazardous waste, emissions requirements, and equipment
standards. The Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, among other things, revised hours of service rules
for train and certain other railroad employees, mandated implementation of PTC, imposed passenger
service requirements, addressed safety at rail crossings, increased the number of safety related
employees of the FRA, and increased fines that may be levied against railroads for safety violations.
Additionally, various state and local agencies have jurisdiction over disposal of hazardous waste and
seek to regulate movement of hazardous materials in ways not preempted by federal law.
Environmental Regulation – We are subject to extensive federal and state environmental statutes and
regulations pertaining to public health and the environment. The statutes and regulations are
administered and monitored by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and by various state
environmental agencies. The primary laws affecting our operations are the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, regulating the management and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes; the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, regulating the cleanup of
contaminated properties; the Clean Air Act, regulating air emissions; and the Clean Water Act, regulating
waste water discharges.
Information concerning environmental claims and contingencies and estimated remediation costs is set
forth in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations –
Critical Accounting Policies – Environmental, Item 7 and Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
9
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The information set forth in this Item 1A should be read in conjunction with the rest of the information
included in this report, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations, Item 7, and Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8.
We Must Manage Fluctuating Demand for Our Services and Network Capacity – If there is significant
demand for our services that exceeds the designed capacity of our network, we may experience network
difficulties, including congestion and reduced velocity, that could compromise the level of service we
provide to our customers. This level of demand may also compound the impact of weather and weather-
related events on our operations and velocity. Although we continue to improve our transportation plan,
add capacity, improve operations at our yards and other facilities, and improve our ability to address
surges in demand for any reason with adequate resources, we cannot be sure that these measures will
fully or adequately address any service shortcomings resulting from demand exceeding our planned
capacity. We may experience other operational or service difficulties related to network capacity,
dramatic and unplanned increases or decreases of demand for rail service with respect to one or more of
our commodity groups or operating regions, or other events that could have a negative impact on our
operational efficiency, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations,
financial condition, and liquidity. In the event that we experience significant reductions of demand for rail
services with respect to one or more of our commodity groups, we may experience increased costs
associated with resizing our operations, including higher unit operating costs and costs for the storage of
locomotives, rail cars, and other equipment; work-force adjustments; and other related activities, which
could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
We Transport Hazardous Materials – We transport certain hazardous materials and other materials,
including crude oil and toxic inhalation hazard (TIH) materials, such as chlorine, that pose certain risks in
the event of a release or combustion. Additionally, U.S. laws impose common carrier obligations on
railroads that require us to transport certain hazardous materials regardless of risk or potential exposure
to loss. A rail accident or other incident or accident on our network, at our facilities, or at the facilities of
our customers involving the release or combustion of hazardous materials could involve significant costs
and claims for personal injury, property damage, and environmental penalties and remediation in excess
of our insurance coverage for these risks, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
We Are Subject to Significant Governmental Regulation – We are subject to governmental regulation by a
significant number of federal, state, and local authorities covering a variety of health, safety, labor,
environmental, economic (as discussed below), and other matters. Many laws and regulations require us
to obtain and maintain various licenses, permits, and other authorizations, and we cannot guarantee that
we will continue to be able to do so. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could have
a material adverse effect on us. Governments or regulators may change the legislative or regulatory
frameworks within which we operate without providing us any recourse to address any adverse effects on
our business, including, without limitation, regulatory determinations or rules regarding dispute resolution,
business relationships with other railroads, calculation of our cost of capital or other inputs relevant to
computing our revenue adequacy, the prices we charge, and costs and expenses. Significant legislative
activity in Congress or regulatory activity by the STB could expand regulation of railroad operations and
prices for rail services, which could reduce capital spending on our rail network, facilities and equipment
and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. As part
of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, rail carriers must currently implement PTC by the end of
2015, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to make other capital investments. Rail
carriers likely will not meet the current mandatory deadline for PTC implementation due to various factors.
Additionally, one or more consolidations of Class I railroads could also lead to increased regulation of the
rail industry.
We May Be Affected by General Economic Conditions – Prolonged severe adverse domestic and global
economic conditions or disruptions of financial and credit markets may affect the producers and
consumers of the commodities we carry and may have a material adverse effect on our access to liquidity
and our results of operations and financial condition.
We Face Competition from Other Railroads and Other Transportation Providers – We face competition
from other railroads, motor carriers, ships, barges, and pipelines. In addition to price competition, we face
competition with respect to transit times and quality and reliability of service. While we must build or
10
acquire and maintain our rail system, trucks, barges and maritime operators are able to use public rights-
of-way maintained by public entities. Any future improvements or expenditures materially increasing the
quality or reducing the cost of alternative modes of transportation, or legislation that eliminates or
significantly reduces the burden of the size or weight limitations currently applicable to motor carriers,
could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
Additionally, any future consolidation of the rail industry could materially affect the competitive
environment in which we operate.
Severe Weather Could Result in Significant Business Interruptions and Expenditures – As a railroad with
a vast network, we are exposed to severe weather conditions and other natural phenomena, including
earthquakes, hurricanes, fires, floods, mudslides or landslides, extreme temperatures, and significant
precipitation that may cause business interruptions, including line outages on our rail network, that can
adversely affect our entire rail network and result in increased costs, increased liabilities, and decreased
revenue, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and
liquidity.
We Rely on Technology and Technology Improvements in Our Business Operations – We rely on
information technology in all aspects of our business. If we do not have sufficient capital to acquire new
technology or if we are unable to develop or implement new technology such as PTC or the latest version
of our transportation control systems, we may suffer a competitive disadvantage within the rail industry
and with companies providing other modes of transportation service, which could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Additionally, if a cyber attack or other
event causes significant disruption or failure of one or more of our information technology systems,
including computer hardware, software, and communications equipment, we could suffer a significant
service interruption, safety failure, security breach, or other operational difficulties, which could have a
material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
We May Be Subject to Various Claims and Lawsuits That Could Result in Significant Expenditures – As a
railroad with operations in densely populated urban areas and other cities and a vast rail network, we are
exposed to the potential for various claims and litigation related to labor and employment, personal injury,
property damage, environmental liability, and other matters. Any material changes to litigation trends or a
catastrophic rail accident or series of accidents involving any or all of property damage, personal injury,
and environmental liability that exceed our insurance coverage for such risks could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
We Are Subject to Significant Environmental Laws and Regulations – Due to the nature of the railroad
business, our operations are subject to extensive federal, state, and local environmental laws and
regulations concerning, among other things, emissions to the air; discharges to waters; handling, storage,
transportation, and disposal of waste and other materials; and hazardous material or petroleum releases.
We generate and transport hazardous and non-hazardous waste in our operations, and we did so in our
former operations. Environmental liability can extend to previously owned or operated properties, leased
properties, and properties owned by third parties, as well as to properties we currently own.
Environmental liabilities have arisen and may also arise from claims asserted by adjacent landowners or
other third parties in toxic tort litigation. We have been and may be subject to allegations or findings that
we have violated, or are strictly liable under, these laws or regulations. We currently have certain
obligations at existing sites for investigation, remediation and monitoring, and we likely will have
obligations at other sites in the future. Liabilities for these obligations affect our estimate based on our
experience and, as necessary, the advice and assistance of our consultants. However, actual costs may
vary from our estimates due to any or all of several factors, including changes to environmental laws or
interpretations of such laws, technological changes affecting investigations and remediation, the
participation and financial viability of other parties responsible for any such liability and the corrective
action or change to correction actions required to remediate any existing or future sites. We could incur
significant costs as a result of any of the foregoing, and we may be required to incur significant expenses
to investigate and remediate known, unknown, or future environmental contamination, which could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
We May Be Affected by Climate Change and Market or Regulatory Responses to Climate Change –
Climate change, including the impact of global warming, could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Restrictions, caps, taxes, or other controls on
emissions of greenhouse gasses, including diesel exhaust, could significantly increase our operating
costs. Restrictions on emissions could also affect our customers that (a) use commodities that we carry
11
farmers and
including chemical producers,
to produce energy, (b) use significant amounts of energy in producing or delivering the commodities we
carry, or (c) manufacture or produce goods that consume significant amounts of energy or burn fossil
fuels,
food producers, and automakers and other
manufacturers. Significant cost increases, government regulation, or changes of consumer preferences
for goods or services relating to alternative sources of energy or emissions reductions could materially
affect the markets for the commodities we carry, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Government incentives encouraging the use of
alternative sources of energy could also affect certain of our customers and the markets for certain of the
commodities we carry in an unpredictable manner that could alter our traffic patterns, including, for
example, the impacts of ethanol incentives on farming and ethanol producers. Finally, we could face
increased costs related to defending and resolving legal claims and other litigation related to climate
change and the alleged impact of our operations on climate change. Any of these factors, individually or
in operation with one or more of the other factors, or other unforeseen impacts of climate change could
reduce the amount of traffic we handle and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations,
financial condition, and liquidity.
Strikes or Work Stoppages Could Adversely Affect Our Operations as the Majority of Our Employees
Belong to Labor Unions and Labor Agreements – The U.S. Class I railroads are party to collective
bargaining agreements with various labor unions. Disputes with regard to the terms of these agreements
or our potential inability to negotiate acceptable contracts with these unions could result in, among other
things, strikes, work stoppages, slowdowns, or lockouts, which could cause a significant disruption of our
operations and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and
liquidity. Additionally, future national labor agreements, or renegotiation of labor agreements or provisions
of labor agreements, could compromise our service reliability or significantly increase our costs for health
care, wages, and other benefits, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations,
financial condition, and liquidity.
The Availability of Qualified Personnel Could Adversely Affect Our Operations – Changes in
demographics, training requirements, and the availability of qualified personnel could negatively affect our
ability to meet demand for rail service. Unpredictable increases in demand for rail services and a lack of
network fluidity may exacerbate such risks, which could have a negative impact on our operational
efficiency and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition,
and liquidity.
Rising or Elevated Fuel Costs and Our Ability to Mitigate These Costs with Fuel Surcharges – Fuel costs
constitute a significant portion of our transportation expenses. Diesel fuel prices can be subject to
dramatic fluctuations, and significant price increases could have a material adverse effect on our
operating results. Although we currently are able to recover a significant amount of our fuel expenses
from our customers through revenue from fuel surcharges, we cannot be certain that we will always be
able to mitigate rising or elevated fuel costs through our fuel surcharges. Additionally future market
conditions or legislative or regulatory activities could adversely affect our ability to apply fuel surcharges
or adequately recover increased fuel costs through fuel surcharges. International, political, and economic
factors, events and conditions affect fuel prices and supplies. Weather can also affect fuel supplies and
limit domestic refining capacity. A severe shortage of, or disruption to, domestic fuel supplies could have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
We Utilize Capital Markets – Due to the significant capital expenditures required to operate and maintain
a safe and efficient railroad, we rely on the capital markets to provide some of our capital requirements.
We utilize long-term debt instruments, bank financing and commercial paper from time-to-time, and we
pledge certain of our receivables. Significant instability or disruptions of the capital markets, including the
credit markets, or deterioration of our financial condition due to internal or external factors could restrict or
prohibit our access to, and significantly increase the cost of, commercial paper and other financing
sources, including bank credit facilities and the issuance of long-term debt, including corporate bonds. A
significant deterioration of our financial condition could result in a reduction of our credit rating to below
investment grade, which could restrict, or at certain credit levels below investment grade may prohibit us,
from utilizing our current receivables securitization facility. This may also limit our access to external
sources of capital and significantly increase the costs of short and long-term debt financing.
A Significant Portion of Our Revenue Involves Transportation of Commodities to and from International
Markets – Although revenues from our operations are attributable to transportation services provided in
the United States, a significant portion of our revenues involves the transportation of commodities to and
12
from international markets, including Mexico and Southeast Asia, by various carriers and, at times,
various modes of transportation. Significant and sustained interruptions of trade with Mexico or countries
in Southeast Asia, including China, could adversely affect customers and other entities that, directly or
indirectly, purchase or rely on rail transportation services in the U.S. as part of their operations, and any
such interruptions could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition
and liquidity. Any one or more of the following could cause a significant and sustained interruption of
trade with Mexico or countries in Southeast Asia: a deterioration of security for international trade and
businesses; the adverse impact of new laws, rules and regulations or the interpretation of laws, rules and
regulations by government entities, courts or regulatory bodies, including taxing authorities, that affect our
customers doing business in foreign countries; any significant adverse economic developments, such as
extended periods of high inflation, material disruptions in the banking sector or in the capital markets of
these foreign countries, and significant changes in the valuation of the currencies of these foreign
countries that could materially affect the cost or value of imports or exports; shifts in patterns of
international trade that adversely affect import and export markets; and a material reduction in foreign
direct investment in these countries.
We Are Subject to Legislative, Regulatory, and Legal Developments Involving Taxes – Taxes are a
significant part of our expenses. We are subject to U.S. federal, state, and foreign income, payroll,
property, sales and use, fuel, and other types of taxes. Changes in tax rates, enactment of new tax laws,
revisions of tax regulations, and claims or litigation with taxing authorities could result in substantially
higher taxes and, therefore, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition, and liquidity.
We Are Dependent on Certain Key Suppliers of Locomotives and Rail – Due to the capital intensive
nature and sophistication of locomotive equipment, potential new suppliers face high barriers to entry.
Therefore, if one of the domestic suppliers of high horsepower locomotives discontinues manufacturing
locomotives for any reason, including bankruptcy or insolvency, we could experience significant cost
increases and reduced availability of the locomotives that are necessary for our operations. Additionally,
for a high percentage of our rail purchases, we utilize two steel producers (one domestic and one
international) that meet our specifications. Rail is critical to our operations for rail replacement programs,
maintenance, and for adding additional network capacity, new rail and storage yards, and expansions of
existing facilities. This industry similarly has high barriers to entry, and if one of these suppliers
discontinues operations for any reason, including bankruptcy or insolvency, we could experience both
significant cost increases for rail purchases and difficulty obtaining sufficient rail for maintenance and
other projects.
We May Be Affected by Acts of Terrorism, War, or Risk of War – Our rail lines, facilities, and equipment,
including rail cars carrying hazardous materials, could be direct targets or indirect casualties of terrorist
attacks. Terrorist attacks, or other similar events, any government response thereto, and war or risk of
war may adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. In addition, insurance
premiums for some or all of our current coverages could increase dramatically, or certain coverages may
not be available to us in the future.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
13
Item 2. Properties
We employ a variety of assets in the management and operation of our rail business. Our rail network
covers 23 states in the western two-thirds of the U.S.
TRACK
Our rail network includes 31,838 route miles. We own 26,009 miles and operate on the remainder
pursuant to trackage rights or leases. The following table describes track miles at December 31, 2013
and 2012.
Route
Other main line
Passing lines and turnouts
Switching and classification yard lines
Total miles
HEADQUARTERS BUILDING
2013
31,838
6,766
3,167
9,090
2012
31,868
6,715
3,124
9,046
50,861
50,753
We maintain our headquarters in Omaha, Nebraska. The facility has 1.2 million square feet of space for
approximately 4,000 employees and is subject to a financing arrangement.
HARRIMAN DISPATCHING CENTER
The Harriman Dispatching Center (HDC), located in Omaha, Nebraska, is our primary dispatching facility.
It is linked to regional dispatching and locomotive management facilities at various locations along our
14
network. HDC employees coordinate moves of locomotives and trains, manage traffic and train crews on
our network, and coordinate interchanges with other railroads. Approximately 850 employees currently
work on-site in the facility. In the event of a disruption of operations at HDC due to a cyber attack, flooding
or severe weather or other event, we maintain the capability to conduct critical operations at back-up
facilities in different locations.
RAIL FACILITIES
In addition to our track structure, we operate numerous facilities, including terminals for intermodal and
other freight; rail yards for train-building (classification yards), switching, storage-in-transit (the temporary
storage of customer goods in rail cars prior to shipment) and other activities; offices to administer and
manage our operations; dispatching centers to direct traffic on our rail network; crew quarters to house
train crews along our network; and shops and other facilities for fueling, maintenance, and repair of
locomotives and repair and maintenance of rail cars and other equipment. The following tables include
the major yards and terminals on our system:
Top 10 Classification Yards
North Platte, Nebraska
North Little Rock, Arkansas
Englewood (Houston), Texas
Fort Worth, Texas
Proviso (Chicago), Illinois
Livonia, Louisiana
Roseville, California
Pine Bluff, Arkansas
West Colton, California
Neff (Kansas City), Missouri
Top 10 Intermodal Terminals
Global IV (Joliet), Illinois
ICTF (Los Angeles), California
East Los Angeles, California
DIT (Dallas), Texas
Global I (Chicago), Illinois
Marion (Memphis), Tennessee
City of Industry, California
Global II (Chicago), Illinois
Lathrop, California
Mesquite, Texas
RAIL EQUIPMENT
Avg. Daily
Car Volume
2012
2,300
1,600
1,500
1,400
1,300
1,300
1,200
1,200
1,100
1,000
Annual Lifts
2012
347,000
448,000
427,000
310,000
306,000
271,000
226,000
253,000
228,000
236,000
2013
2,300
1,600
1,600
1,400
1,400
1,300
1,200
1,100
1,100
1,100
2013
484,000
469,000
429,000
310,000
263,000
261,000
256,000
256,000
248,000
238,000
Our equipment includes owned and leased locomotives and rail cars; heavy maintenance equipment and
machinery; other equipment and tools in our shops, offices, and facilities; and vehicles for maintenance,
transportation of crews, and other activities. As of December 31, 2013, we owned or leased the following
units of equipment:
Locomotives
Multiple purpose
Switching
Other
Total locomotives
Owned Leased Total
7,779
358
129
2,348
14
57
5,431
344
72
Average
Age (yrs.)
18.0
33.9
34.1
5,847
2,419
8,266
N/A
15
Freight cars
Covered hoppers
Open hoppers
Gondolas
Boxcars
Refrigerated cars
Flat cars
Other
Total freight cars
Highway revenue equipment
Containers
Chassis
Owned Leased Total
27,893
12,555
11,078
5,165
6,843
3,871
350
14,531
4,284
4,711
1,400
4,192
1,181
329
13,362
8,271
6,367
3,765
2,651
2,690
21
Average
Age (yrs.)
20.0
28.1
23.7
28.2
24.9
28.9
N/A
37,127
30,628
67,755
N/A
Owned Leased Total
50,826
36,925
29,240
24,840
21,586
12,085
Average
Age (yrs.)
7.0
8.6
Total highway revenue equipment
33,671
54,080
87,751
N/A
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Our rail network requires significant annual capital investments for replacement, improvement, and
expansion. These investments enhance safety, support the transportation needs of our customers, and
improve our operational efficiency. Additionally, we add new locomotives and freight cars to our fleet to
replace older, less efficient equipment, to support growth and customer demand, and to reduce our
impact on the environment through the acquisition of more fuel efficient and low-emission locomotives.
2013 Capital Expenditures – During 2013, we made cash and non-cash capital investments totaling
$3.6 billion. (See the cash capital expenditures table in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Financial Condition,
Item 7.)
2014 Capital Expenditures – In 2014, we expect to make capital investments of approximately $3.9
billion, which will include expenditures for PTC of approximately $450 million and may include non-cash
investments. We may revise our 2014 capital plan if business conditions warrant or if new laws or
regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments. (See discussion of our
2014 capital plan in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations – 2014 Outlook, Item 7.)
OTHER
Equipment Encumbrances – Equipment with a carrying value of approximately $2.9 billion at both
December 31, 2013, and 2012 served as collateral for capital leases and other types of equipment
obligations in accordance with the secured financing arrangements utilized to acquire or refinance such
railroad equipment.
As a result of the merger of Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (MPRR) with and into UPRR on January
1, 1997, and pursuant to the underlying indentures for the MPRR mortgage bonds, UPRR must maintain
the same value of assets after the merger in order to comply with the security requirements of the
mortgage bonds. As of the merger date, the value of the MPRR assets that secured the mortgage bonds
was approximately $6.0 billion. In accordance with the terms of the indentures, this collateral value must
be maintained during the entire term of the mortgage bonds irrespective of the outstanding balance of
such bonds.
Environmental Matters – Certain of our properties are subject to federal, state, and local laws and
regulations governing the protection of the environment. (See discussion of environmental issues in
Business – Governmental and Environmental Regulation, Item 1, and Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies – Environmental,
Item 7.)
16
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings, claims, and litigation that occur in connection
with our business. We routinely assess our liabilities and contingencies in connection with these matters
based upon the latest available information and, when necessary, we seek input from our third-party
advisors when making these assessments. Consistent with SEC rules and requirements, we describe
below material pending legal proceedings (other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our
business), material proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities, other
proceedings arising under federal, state, or local environmental laws and regulations (including
governmental proceedings involving potential fines, penalties, or other monetary sanctions in excess of
$100,000), and such other pending matters that we may determine to be appropriate.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
As previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2012, the Illinois Attorney General's Office
notified UPRR on January 14, 2013, that it will seek a penalty against the Railroad for environmental
conditions caused by its predecessor at a former locomotive fueling facility in South Pekin, Illinois. This
former CNW facility discontinued fueling operations in the early 1980s. Subsequent environmental
investigation revealed evidence of fuel releases to soil and groundwater. In January 2007, the State
rejected UPRR's proposed compliance commitment agreement and responded with a notice of intent to
pursue legal action. UPRR continued to perform remedial investigations under the supervision of the
Illinois EPA. In June 2012, the Illinois EPA approved UPRR's proposed remedial action plan for the
contamination. Although no further action is required for the contamination, the State is now seeking to
recover a penalty. The State offered to settle the matter prior to litigation for payment of a $240,000
penalty. UPRR rejected that offer, and the state sued UPRR on October 26, 2013 in the Circuit Court for
the Tenth Judicial Circuit, Tazewell County, Illinois. UPRR will vigorously defend against the allegations
in the complaint. Although the complaint does not state an amount for the proposed penalty, any penalty,
whether payable by settlement or following an unsuccessful defense of the claim, may exceed $100,000.
We received notices from the EPA and state environmental agencies alleging that we are or may be liable
under federal or state environmental laws for remediation costs at various sites throughout the U.S.,
including sites on the Superfund National Priorities List or state superfund lists. We cannot predict the
ultimate impact of these proceedings and suits because of the number of potentially responsible parties
involved, the degree of contamination by various wastes, the scarcity and quality of volumetric data
related to many of the sites, and the speculative nature of remediation costs.
Information concerning environmental claims and contingencies and estimated remediation costs is set
forth in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations –
Critical Accounting Policies – Environmental, Item 7.
OTHER MATTERS
Antitrust Litigation - As we reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2007, 20 rail shippers (many of whom are represented by the same law firms) filed virtually identical
antitrust lawsuits in various federal district courts against us and four other Class I railroads in the U.S.
Currently, UPRR and three other Class I railroads are the named defendants in the lawsuit. The original
plaintiff filed the first of these claims in the U.S. District Court in New Jersey on May 14, 2007. The
number of complaints reached a total of 30. These suits allege that the named railroads engaged in price-
fixing by establishing common fuel surcharges for certain rail traffic.
In addition to suits filed by direct purchasers of rail transportation, a few of the suits involved plaintiffs
alleging that they are or were indirect purchasers of rail transportation and sought to represent a
purported class of indirect purchasers of rail transportation that paid fuel surcharges. These complaints
added allegations under state antitrust and consumer protection laws. On November 6, 2007, the Judicial
Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered that all of the rail fuel surcharge cases be transferred to Judge
Paul Friedman of the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia for coordinated or consolidated pretrial
proceedings. Following numerous hearings and rulings, Judge Friedman dismissed the complaints of the
indirect purchasers, which the indirect purchasers appealed. On April 16, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia affirmed Judge Friedman’s ruling dismissing the indirect purchasers’ claims
based on various state laws.
17
With respect to the direct purchasers’ complaint, Judge Friedman conducted a two-day hearing on
October 6 and 7, 2010, on the class certification issue and the railroad defendants’ motion to exclude
evidence of interline communications. On April 7, 2011, Judge Friedman issued an order deferring any
decision on class certification until the Supreme Court issued its decision in the Wal-Mart employment
discrimination case.
On June 21, 2012, Judge Friedman issued his decision, which certified a class of plaintiffs with eight
named plaintiff representatives. The decision included in the class all shippers that paid a rate-based fuel
surcharge to any one of the defendant railroads for rate-unregulated rail transportation from July 1, 2003,
through December 31, 2008. This was a procedural ruling, which did not affirm any of the claims asserted
by the plaintiffs and does not affect the ability of the railroad defendants to disprove the allegations made
by the plaintiffs. On July 5, 2012, the defendant railroads filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia requesting that the court review the class certification ruling. On August 28, 2012,
a panel of the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia referred the petition to a merits panel of the court to
address the issues in the petition and to address whether the district court properly granted class
certification. The Circuit Court heard oral arguments on May 3, 2013. On August 9, 2013, the Circuit
Court vacated the class certification decision and remanded the case to the district court to reconsider the
class certification decision in light of a recent Supreme Court case and incomplete consideration of errors
in the expert report of the plaintiffs. On October 31, 2013, Judge Friedman approved a schedule agreed
to by all parties for consideration of the class certification issue on remand. The schedule, which includes
dates for briefs, expert reports and depositions, concludes in June 2014. The court has not set a date for
hearing arguments on the class certification issue or any other aspect of this litigation.
As we reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 10, 2011, the Railroad received a
complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on June 7, 2011, by Oxbow Carbon &
Minerals LLC and related entities (Oxbow). The complaint named the Railroad and one other U.S. Class I
Railroad as defendants and alleged that the named railroads engaged in price-fixing and monopolistic
practices in connection with fuel surcharge programs and pricing of shipments of certain commodities,
including coal and petroleum coke. The complaint sought injunctive relief and payment of damages of
over $30 million, and other unspecified damages, including treble damages. Some of the allegations in
the complaint were addressed in the existing fuel surcharge litigation referenced above. The complaint
also included additional unrelated allegations regarding alleged limitations on competition for shipments
of Oxbow’s commodities. Judge Friedman, who presides over the fuel surcharge matter described above,
also presides over this matter. On February 26, 2013, Judge Friedman granted the defendants’ motion to
dismiss Oxbow’s complaint for failure to state properly a claim under the antitrust laws. However, the
dismissal was without prejudice to refile the complaint. Judge Friedman approved a schedule that allowed
Oxbow to file a revised complaint, which Oxbow filed on May 1, 2013. The amended complaint alleges
that UPRR and one other Class I railroad violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act and that
UPRR also breached a tolling agreement between Oxbow and UPRR. Oxbow claims that it paid more
than $50 million in wrongfully imposed fuel surcharges. UPRR and the other railroad filed separate
motions to dismiss the Oxbow revised complaint on July 1, 2013.
We deny the allegations that our fuel surcharge programs violate the antitrust laws or any other laws. We
believe that these lawsuits are without merit, and we will vigorously defend our actions. Therefore, we
currently believe that these matters will not have a material adverse effect on any of our results of
operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
18
Executive Officers of the Registrant and Principal Executive Officers of Subsidiaries
The Board of Directors typically elects and designates our executive officers on an annual basis at the
board meeting held in conjunction with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and they hold office until
their successors are elected. Executive officers also may be elected and designated throughout the year,
as the Board of Directors considers appropriate. There are no family relationships among the officers, nor
any arrangement or understanding between any officer and any other person pursuant to which the
officer was selected. The following table sets forth certain information current as of February 7, 2014,
relating to the executive officers.
Name
John J. Koraleski
Robert M. Knight, Jr.
Diane K. Duren
Gayla L. Thal
Jeffrey P. Totusek
Lance M. Fritz
Eric L. Butler
Position
President and Chief Executive Officer of UPC
and Chief Executive Officer of the Railroad
Executive Vice President – Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of UPC and the Railroad
Executive Vice President and Corporate
Secretary of UPC and the Railroad
Senior Vice President – Law and General
Counsel of UPC and the Railroad
Vice President and Controller of UPC and Chief
Accounting Officer and Controller of the Railroad
President and Chief Operating Officer of the
Railroad
Executive Vice President – Marketing and Sales
of the Railroad
Business
Experience During
Age Past Five Years
63
[1]
56 Current Position
54
57
[2]
[3]
55 Current Position
51
53
[4]
[5]
[1] Mr. Koraleski was elected Chief Executive Officer and President of UPC and the Railroad effective March 2, 2012. In
connection with the election of Mr. Fritz to President of the Railroad on February 6, 2014, Mr. Koraleski no longer serves as
President of the Railroad. He previously was Executive Vice President - Marketing and Sales of the Railroad effective March
1, 1999.
[2] Ms. Duren was elected Executive Vice President of UPC and the Railroad effective October 1, 2012. She previously was Vice
President and General Manager - Chemicals effective August 1, 2006. In addition, Ms. Duren was elected Corporate
Secretary, effective March 1, 2013.
[3] Ms. Thal was elected to her current position effective March 15, 2012. She previously was Vice President - Law and Chief
Compliance Officer effective December 1, 2005.
[4] Mr. Fritz was elected to his current position effective February 6, 2014. He previously was Executive Vice President –
Operations of the Railroad, effective September 1, 2010, and Vice President – Operations of the Railroad, effective January
1, 2010. In addition, Mr. Fritz was Vice President – Labor Relations effective March 1, 2008.
[5] Mr. Butler was elected to his current position effective March 15, 2012. He previously was Vice President and General
Manager - Industrial Products effective April 14, 2005.
19
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “UNP”. The
following table presents the dividends declared and the high and low prices of our common stock for each
of the indicated quarters.
2013 - Dollars Per Share
Dividends
Common stock price:
High
Low
2012 - Dollars Per Share
Dividends
Common stock price:
High
Low
Q1
0.69
$
Q2
0.69
$
Q3
0.79
$
Q4
0.79
$
143.00
127.32
161.00
135.75
165.18
152.04
168.24
149.23
Q1
0.60
$
Q2
0.60
$
Q3
0.60
$
Q4
0.69
$
117.40
104.77
119.82
104.08
129.27
115.38
128.38
116.06
At January 31, 2014, there were 455,057,609 shares of common stock outstanding and 31,914 common
shareholders of record. On that date, the closing price of the common stock on the NYSE was $174.24.
We have paid dividends to our common shareholders during each of the past 114 years. We declared
dividends totaling $1,371 million in 2013 and $1,180 million in 2012. On August 1, 2013, we increased the
quarterly dividend to $0.79 per share, payable on October 1, 2013, to shareholders of record on August
30, 2013. On February 6, 2014, we increased the quarterly dividend to $0.91 per share, payable on April
1, 2014, to shareholders of record on February 28, 2014. We are subject to certain restrictions regarding
retained earnings with respect to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders. The amount of
retained earnings available for dividends increased to $16.3 billion at December 31, 2013, from $15.1
billion at December 31, 2012. (See discussion of this restriction in Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources, Item 7.) We
do not believe the restriction on retained earnings will affect our ability to pay dividends, and we currently
expect to pay dividends in 2014.
Comparison Over One- and Three-Year Periods – The following table presents the cumulative total
shareholder returns, assuming reinvestment of dividends, over one- and three-year periods for the
Corporation (UNP), a peer group index (comprised of CSX Corporation and Norfolk Southern
Corporation), the Dow Jones Transportation Index (DJ Trans), and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock
Index (S&P 500).
DJ Trans
S&P 500
32.4 %
56.8
41.4 %
52.0
Period
1 Year (2013)
3 Year (2011-2013)
UNP Peer Group
51.7 %
36.3 %
51.2
92.6
20
Five-Year Performance Comparison – The following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total
shareholder returns for the Corporation as compared to the peer group index (described above), the DJ
Trans, and the S&P 500. The graph assumes that $100 was invested in the common stock of Union
Pacific Corporation and each index on December 31, 2008 and that all dividends were reinvested. The
information below
future
performance.
is not necessarily
in nature and
indicative of
is historical
Purchases of Equity Securities – During 2013, we repurchased 14,996,957 shares of our common
stock at an average price of $152.14. The following table presents common stock repurchases during
each month for the fourth quarter of 2013:
Period
Oct. 1 through Oct. 31
Nov. 1 through Nov. 30
Dec. 1 through Dec. 31
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased [a]
1,405,535
1,027,840
2,500,944
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
153.18
158.66
163.14
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of a
Publicly Announced
Plan or Program [b]
1,405,535
1,025,000
2,498,520
Maximum Number of
Shares That May Yet Be
Purchased Under the Plan
or Program [b]
4,020,650
2,995,650
497,130
Total
4,934,319 $ 159.37
4,929,055
N/A
[a]
Total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 5,264 shares delivered or attested to UPC by
employees to pay stock option exercise prices, satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting
of retention units, and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares.
[b] On April 1, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by March
31, 2014. These repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions. Our management has sole
discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. On November 21, 2013, the Board of
Directors approved the early renewal of the share repurchase program, authorizing the repurchase of 60 million common
shares by December 31, 2017. The new authorization is effective January 1, 2014, and replaces the previous authorization,
which expired on December 31, 2013, three months earlier than its original expiration date.
21
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table presents as of, and for the years ended, December 31, our selected financial data for
each of the last five years. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7, and with the Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8. The information below is historical in nature and is not
necessarily indicative of future financial condition or results of operations.
Millions, Except per Share Amounts,
Carloads, Employee Statistics, and Ratios
For the Year Ended December 31
Operating revenues [a]
Operating income
Net income
Earnings per share - basic
Earnings per share - diluted
Dividends declared per share
Cash provided by operating activities
Cash used in investing activities
Cash used in financing activities
Cash used for common share repurchases
At December 31
Total assets
Long-term obligations [b]
Debt due after one year
Common shareholders' equity
Additional Data
Freight revenues [a]
Revenue carloads (units) (000)
Operating ratio (%) [c]
Average employees (000)
Financial Ratios (%)
Debt to capital [d]
Return on average common
shareholders' equity [e]
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
$ 21,963
$ 20,926
$ 19,557
$ 16,965
7,446
4,388
9.47
9.42
2.96
6,823
(3,405)
(3,049)
(2,218)
6,745
3,943
8.33
8.27
2.49
6,161
(3,633)
(2,682)
(1,474)
5,724
3,292
6.78
6.72
1.93
5,873
(3,119)
(2,623)
(1,418)
4,981
2,780
5.58
5.53
1.31
4,105
(2,488)
(2,381)
(1,249)
$ 49,731
$ 47,153
$ 45,096
$ 43,088
24,715
8,872
21,225
24,157
8,801
19,877
23,201
8,697
18,578
22,373
9,003
17,763
$ 20,684
$ 19,686
$ 18,508
$ 16,069
9,022
66.1
46.4
9,048
67.8
45.9
9,072
70.7
44.9
31.1
31.2
32.4
21.4
20.5
18.1
8,815
70.6
42.9
34.2
16.1
$ 14,143
3,379
1,890
3.76
3.74
1.08
3,204
(2,145)
(458)
-
$ 42,184
22,701
9,636
16,801
$ 13,373
7,786
76.1
43.5
37.0
11.8
[a]
[b]
Includes fuel surcharge revenue of $2.6 billion, $2.6 billion, $2.2 billion, $1.2 billion, and $0.6 billion for 2013, 2012, 2011,
2010, and 2009, respectively, which partially offsets increased operating expenses for fuel. (See further discussion in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Operating
Revenues, Item 7.)
Long-term obligations is determined as follows: total liabilities less current liabilities.
[c] Operating ratio is defined as operating expenses divided by operating revenues.
[d] Debt to capital is determined as follows: total debt divided by total debt plus common shareholders' equity.
[e] Return on average common shareholders' equity is determined as follows: Net income divided by average common
shareholders' equity.
22
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and
applicable notes to the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8, and other information in
this report, including Risk Factors set forth in Item 1A and Critical Accounting Policies and Cautionary
Information at the end of this Item 7.
The Railroad, along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates, is our one reportable business segment.
Although revenue is analyzed by commodity, we analyze the net financial results of the Railroad as one
segment due to the integrated nature of the rail network.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2013 Results
Safety – During 2013, we continued focusing on safety to reduce risk and eliminate incidents for our
employees, our customers and the public. Our sustained efforts to improve crossing warning
systems and, where possible, close at-grade crossings reduced grade crossing incidents per million
train miles by 7% during the year. We closed 212 grade crossings in 2013 to reduce our exposure to
incidents and continued using video cameras on our locomotives to analyze safety incidents.
Although reportable personal injury incidents per 200,000 employee hours increased 4% from last
year’s record low, it is our second lowest year and a 9% decline from 2011. Our reportable derailment
incidents per million train miles increased slightly, less than 1%, from 2012. These results
demonstrate our continued development and expansion of our safety programs and initiatives,
including Courage to Care, Total Safety Culture, and Standard Work.
Financial Performance – In 2013, we generated operating income of $7.4 billion, a 10% increase
over 2012. Core pricing gains of 3.6% along with our ongoing focus on safety, service, network
efficiency and productivity drove record financial results for the year. Our operating ratio for 2013 of
66.1% was an all-time best, improving from last year’s operating ratio of 67.8%. Net income of $4.4
billion surpassed our previous milestone set in 2012, translating into earnings of $9.42 per diluted
share for 2013.
Freight Revenues – Our freight revenues grew 5% year-over-year to $20.7 billion. Freight revenues
for five of the six commodity groups increased despite flat volume. Volume growth in shale-related
products (crude oil and frac sand), automotive and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal,
international intermodal and agricultural products. Core pricing gains, an automotive logistics
management arrangement and shifts in business mix all resulted in higher average revenue per car
(ARC), which drove the growth in freight revenue in 2013 compared to 2012. Our fuel surcharge was
essentially flat versus 2012, as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag
effect of our programs (surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months).
Network Operations – In 2013, despite challenging weather and significant shifts in our business
mix, our operations remained efficient and fluid. As reported to the Association of American Railroads
(AAR), average train speed declined 2% in 2013 compared to 2012, reflecting severe weather
conditions and shifts of traffic to sections of our network with higher utilization. Average terminal
dwell time increased 3% primarily due to continuing growth of manifest traffic, which requires more
time in terminals for switching cars and building trains.
Fuel Prices – In 2013, the average price per barrel of crude oil increased from 2012. However, the
average price per gallon of diesel fuel that we paid in 2013 decreased 2% from the average price in
2012, as lower crude oil to diesel conversion spreads in 2013 more than offset the higher price for
crude oil. The lower price decreased operating expenses by $75 million (excluding any impact from
year-over-year volume). A 1% decline in gross-ton miles also drove lower fuel expense. Our fuel
consumption rate, computed as gallons of fuel consumed divided by gross ton-miles, increased 2%
compared to 2012 partially offsetting the decreases. Declines in heavier, more fuel-efficient coal
shipments drove the gross-ton-mile and fuel consumption rate variances.
Free Cash Flow – Cash generated by operating activities totaled $6.8 billion, yielding record free
cash flow of $2.1 billion after reductions of $3.4 billion for cash used in investing activities and a 16%
23
increase in dividends paid. Free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities less
cash used in investing activities and dividends paid.
Free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted
in the U.S. (GAAP) by SEC Regulation G and Item 10 of SEC Regulation S-K and may not be defined
and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We believe free cash flow is important to
management and investors in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to
generate cash without additional external financings. Free cash flow should be considered in addition
to, rather than as a substitute for, cash provided by operating activities. The following table reconciles
cash provided by operating activities (GAAP measure) to free cash flow (non-GAAP measure):
Millions
Cash provided by operating activities
Cash used in investing activities
Dividends paid
Free cash flow
2014 Outlook
2013
2012
2011
$ 6,823 $ 6,161 $ 5,873
(3,119)
(837)
$ 2,085 $ 1,382 $ 1,917
(3,633)
(1,146)
(3,405)
(1,333)
Safety – Operating a safe railroad benefits our employees, our customers, our shareholders, and the
communities we serve. We will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety, utilizing technology,
risk assessment, quality control, training and employee engagement, and targeted capital
investments. We will continue using and expanding the deployment of Total Safety Culture and
Courage to Care throughout our operations, which allows us to identify and implement best practices
for employee and operational safety. Derailment prevention and the reduction of grade crossing
incidents are also critical aspects of our safety programs. We will continue our efforts to increase
detection of rail defects; improve or close crossings; and educate the public and law enforcement
agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs (including risk
assessment strategies), various industry programs and local community activities across our network.
Network Operations – We believe the Railroad is capable of handling growing volumes while
providing high levels of customer service. Our track structure is in excellent condition, and certain
sections of our network have surplus line and terminal capacity. We are in a solid resource position,
with sufficient supplies of locomotives, freight cars and crews to support growth.
Fuel Prices – Uncertainty about the economy makes projections of fuel prices difficult. We again
could see volatile fuel prices during the year, as they are sensitive to global and U.S. domestic
demand, refining capacity, geopolitical events, weather conditions and other factors. To reduce the
impact of fuel price on earnings, we will continue seeking cost recovery from our customers through
our fuel surcharge programs and expanding our fuel conservation efforts.
Capital Plan – In 2014, we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $3.9 billion,
including expenditures for Positive Train Control (PTC), which may be revised if business conditions
warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these
investments. (See further discussion in this Item 7 under Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital
Plan.)
Positive Train Control – In response to a legislative mandate to implement PTC by the end of 2015,
we have invested $1.2 billion in capital expenditures and plan to spend an additional $450 million
during 2014 on developing and deploying PTC. We currently estimate that PTC, in accordance with
implementing rules issued by the Federal Rail Administration (FRA), will cost us approximately $2
billion by the end of the project. This includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks,
upgrading locomotives to work with the new system, and adding digital data communication
equipment to integrate the various components of the system and achieve interoperability for the
industry. Although it is unlikely that the rail industry will meet the current mandatory 2015 deadline
(as the FRA indicated in its 2012 report to Congress), we are making a good faith effort to do so and
we are working closely with regulators as we implement this new technology.
24
Financial Expectations – We are cautious about the economic environment, but, assuming that
industrial production grows approximately 3% as projected, volume should exceed 2013 levels. Even
with no volume growth, we expect earnings to exceed 2013 earnings, generated by core pricing
gains, on-going network improvements and productivity initiatives. We expect that free cash flow for
2014 will be lower than 2013 as higher cash from operations will be more than offset by additional
cash of approximately $400 million that will be used to pay income taxes that were previously
deferred through bonus depreciation, increased capital spend and higher dividend payments.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operating Revenues
Millions
Freight revenues
Other revenues
Total
2013
$ 20,684
2012
$ 19,686
1,279
1,240
2011
$ 18,508
1,049
% Change
2013 v 2012
5%
3
% Change
2012 v 2011
6%
18
$ 21,963
$ 20,926
$ 19,557
5%
7%
We generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups.
Freight revenues vary with volume (carloads) and ARC. Changes in price, traffic mix and fuel surcharges
drive ARC. We provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding
specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations, which we record as reductions to
freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments. We recognize freight revenues as
shipments move from origin to destination. We allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based
on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them.
Other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries, revenues from our commuter rail
operations, and accessorial revenues, which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or
controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage. We recognize other
revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations.
Freight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012.
Revenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012. ARC increased 5%, driven by
core pricing gains, shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement. Volume
was essentially flat year over year as growth in automotives, frac sand, crude oil and domestic intermodal
offset declines in coal, international intermodal and grain shipments.
Freight revenues from four of our six commodity groups increased during 2012 compared to 2011.
Revenues from coal and agricultural products declined during the year. Our franchise diversity allowed
us to take advantage of growth from shale-related markets (crude oil, frac sand and pipe) and strong
automotive manufacturing, which offset volume declines from coal and agricultural products. ARC
increased 7%, driven by core pricing gains and higher fuel cost recoveries. Improved fuel recovery
provisions and higher fuel prices, including the lag effect of our programs (surcharges trail fluctuations in
fuel price by approximately two months), combined to increase revenues from fuel surcharges.
Our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $2.6 billion, $2.6 billion, and $2.2 billion in
2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Fuel surcharge in 2013 was essentially flat versus 2012 as lower
fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs (surcharges trail
fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months). Rising fuel prices and more shipments subject to
fuel surcharges drove the increase from 2011 to 2012.
In 2013, other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher
revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services.
In 2012, other revenues increased from 2011 due primarily to higher revenues at our subsidiaries that
broker intermodal and automotive services. Assessorial revenues also increased in 2012 due to
container revenue related to an increase in intermodal shipments.
25
The following tables summarize the year-over-year changes in freight revenues, revenue carloads, and
ARC by commodity type:
Freight Revenues
Millions
Agricultural
Automotive
Chemicals
Coal
Industrial Products
Intermodal
Total
Revenue Carloads
Thousands
Agricultural
Automotive
Chemicals
Coal
Industrial Products
Intermodal [a]
Total
Average Revenue per Car
Agricultural
Automotive
Chemicals
Coal
Industrial Products
Intermodal [a]
% Change
2013 v 2012
% Change
2012 v 2011
$
2013
3,276
2,077
3,501
3,978
3,822
4,030
$
2012
3,280
1,807
3,238
3,912
3,494
3,955
$
2011
3,324
1,510
2,815
4,084
3,166
3,609
$ 20,684
$
19,686
$
18,508
5 %
- %
15
8
2
9
2
(3) %
6
6
(9)
4
-
(1) %
20
15
(4)
10
10
6 %
(4) %
13
13
(14)
3
2
- %
% Change
2013 v 2012
% Change
2012 v 2011
2011
934
653
921
2,164
1,146
3,254
9,072 - %
$
2011
3,561
2,311
3,055
1,888
2,762
1,109
% Change
2013 v 2012
% Change
2012 v 2011
3 %
9
2
12
5
2
5 %
2 %
6
2
11
7
8
7 %
2013
874
781
1,103
1,703
1,236
3,325
9,022
2013
3,746
2,659
3,176
2,336
3,093
1,212
$
2012
900
738
1,042
1,871
1,185
3,312
9,048
2012
3,644
2,448
3,107
2,092
2,947
1,194
$
Average
$
2,293
$
2,176
$
2,040
[a] Each intermodal container or trailer equals one carload.
2013 Agricultural Carloads
Agricultural Products – Lower volume offset
price improvements as freight revenue declined
slightly versus 2012. In the fourth quarter grain
shipments increased 41% due to a robust fall
harvest. Despite the fourth quarter growth,
grain shipments still decreased 4% for the full
year when compared to 2012, reflecting the
impact of the severe drought in 2012 that
affected territory served by us during the first
three quarters of 2013. Export wheat shipped
to the Gulf and Pacific Northwest increased in
the second half of 2013, partially offsetting the
declines in grain.
Lower volume more than offset pricing gains
and increased fuel surcharges as agricultural freight revenue decreased in 2012 versus 2011. Weak
export demand for U.S. wheat drove a 19% decrease in wheat shipments year over year, as the foreign
wheat market improved significantly from the weather affected crop in 2011. In addition, corn shipments
declined 11% for the year, with more significant declines in the fourth quarter, reflecting the impact of the
severe drought across the U.S. Lower gasoline demand, reduced exports and higher corn prices
decreased ethanol shipments during the second half of the year. Growth in imported beer from Mexico
and a strong domestic harvest of fresh potatoes partially offset these declines.
26
the
to price
Automotive – Higher ARC due
increases and
logistics management
arrangement that covers fees and container
costs, coupled with increased shipments of
vehicles,
automotive parts and
improved
2013
compared to 2012. Higher production and sales
levels during 2013 drove the volume growth.
automotive
revenue
finished
in
2013 Automotive Carloads
fuel
higher
surcharges
In 2012, stronger shipments of finished vehicles
and automotive parts along with pricing gains
improved
and
automotive freight revenue from 2011 levels.
Higher production and sales levels drove the
volume growth. In addition, 2012 shipments
compared favorably to 2011 due to lower
shipments of international vehicles in 2011
following the disaster in Japan.
Chemicals – Volume gains and price
improvement increased freight revenue from
chemicals in 2013 versus 2012. Shipments of
crude oil from the Bakken, Permian, Niobrara
and Eagle Ford shale formations primarily to the
Gulf area drove the growth in shipments of
chemicals. In addition, shipments of industrial
chemicals increased as manufacturing, housing
and automotive markets improved.
2013 Chemicals Carloads
increased
freight revenue
Higher volume, price improvements and fuel
surcharges
from
chemicals in 2012. Shipments of crude oil
primarily from the Bakken, Permian and Eagle
the Gulf area
Ford Shale
increased over
the
improvement in chemicals shipments. In addition, plastics and industrial chemicals shipments increased
as low natural gas prices have made U.S. chemicals more cost competitive globally. Declines in potash
due to temporary shutdowns and reduced production at several mines partially offset the increases in
chemical shipments during the year.
to
fold, driving
formations
three
2013 Coal Carloads
Coal – ARC gains driven by price increases and
positive business mix partially offset by volume
declines increased freight revenue from coal
shipments in 2013 versus 2012. Southern
Powder River Basin (SPRB) shipments declined
10% from 2012 due to the loss of a customer
contract at the beginning of the year, relatively
mild summer weather, and tighter coal inventory
management by utilities.
from
Colorado and Utah mines decreased 13%
compared to 2012, driven by soft domestic
demand and mine production issues, partially
offset by second half growth in international
shipments. Severe flooding and washouts in
Colorado also reduced volumes from certain
producers in the third quarter.
Shipments
Lower volume, partially offset by pricing gains and fuel surcharge recoveries reduced freight revenue from
coal shipments in 2012 compared to 2011. Shipments of coal from the Southern Powder River Basin
(SPRB) mines decreased 15% from 2011. Above average coal stockpiles due to an unseasonably warm
winter and low natural gas prices, which caused some displacement of coal in electricity production, led to
27
the volume declines. In addition, the loss of two contracts to a competitor contributed to lower volumes
from the SPRB. Coal shipments from the Colorado and Utah mines increased 2% versus 2011. Increased
export shipments of Colorado and Utah coal in 2012 offset the domestic declines due to higher stockpiles
and low natural gas prices.
2013 Industrial Products Carloads
Industrial Products – Freight revenue from
industrial products increased in 2013 versus
2012 driven by volume growth and higher ARC
due to pricing gains and favorable business mix.
Shipments of non-metallic minerals (primarily
frac sand) grew as a result of drilling activity for
energy products. Additionally, growth in new
housing construction and home improvements
drove an
lumber shipments.
in
Declines
ferrous scrap and government
shipments partially offset these higher volumes.
increase
in
increased
fuel surcharges
improvement, higher volume and
Pricing
additional
freight
revenue from industrial products in 2012 versus
2011. Shipments of non-metallic minerals (primarily frac sand), grew in response to increased horizontal
drilling activity for energy products. More construction activity during a relatively mild winter led to higher
demand for shipments of lumber, cement and stone compared to 2011. The growth in housing starts
throughout 2012 also increased lumber shipments, up 12% from 2011. Steel shipments finished slightly
down from 2011 levels as lower demand for export scrap and mine production issues in the second half
of the year offset increases in the first half due to higher demand for steel coils and plate for pipe and
auto production.
2013 Intermodal Carloads
Intermodal – Pricing improvements and slight
volume growth drove increased freight revenue
from intermodal shipments in 2013 compared to
2012. Domestic traffic increased 3% due to
conversions from truck transportation to rail.
International traffic declined 2% versus 2012,
reflecting market share shifts within the ocean
carrier industry and an increase in transloading
in the second half of the year. Transloading
involves the transfer of goods from international
to domestic containers at distribution centers
near West coast ports, which reduces demand
for rail transportation to these centers.
Higher fuel surcharges, including improved fuel
recovery provisions, core pricing gains and volume growth increased freight revenue from intermodal
shipments in 2012. Volume levels from international traffic remained flat year-over-year as the loss of a
customer contract in the first half of the year offset modest West Coast import growth. Domestic traffic
increased 3% versus 2011 due to better market conditions and continued conversion of traffic from truck
to rail.
Mexico Business – Each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from Mexico.
Revenue from Mexico business increased 9% to $2.1 billion in 2013 versus 2012. Shipments were up
3% versus 2012, all commodity groups grew with the exception of agricultural products. The largest
growth came from automotive and industrial products shipments.
Revenue from Mexico business increased 8% to $1.9 billion in 2012 versus 2011. Volume levels for four
of the six commodity groups (industrial products and agricultural products declined), were up 5% in
aggregate versus 2011, with particularly strong growth in automotive and intermodal shipments.
28
Operating Expenses
Millions
Compensation and benefits
Fuel
Purchased services and materials
Depreciation
Equipment and other rents
Other
$
2013
4,807
3,534
2,315
1,777
1,235
849
$
2012
4,685
3,608
2,143
1,760
1,197
788
$
2011
4,681
3,581
2,005
1,617
1,167
782
Total
$ 14,517
$ 14,181
$ 13,833
% Change
2013 v 2012
% Change
2012 v 2011
3 %
(2)
8
1
3
8
2 %
- %
1
7
9
3
1
3 %
Operating expenses increased $336 million in
2013 versus 2012. Wage and benefit inflation,
new logistics management fees and container
costs for our automotive business, locomotive
overhauls, property taxes and repairs on jointly
owned property contributed to higher expenses
during the year. Lower fuel prices partially offset
the cost increases.
2013 Operating Expenses
Operating expenses increased $348 million in
2012 versus 2011. Depreciation, wage and
benefit inflation, higher fuel prices and volume-
related trucking services purchased by our
logistics subsidiaries, contributed
to higher
expenses during the year. Efficiency gains,
volume related fuel savings (2% fewer gallons of fuel consumed) and $38 million of weather related
expenses in 2011, which favorably affects the comparison, partially offset the cost increase.
Compensation and Benefits – Compensation and benefits include wages, payroll taxes, health and
welfare costs, pension costs, other postretirement benefits, and incentive costs. General wages and
benefits inflation, higher work force levels and increased pension and other postretirement benefits drove
the increases in 2013 versus 2012. The impact of ongoing productivity initiatives partially offset these
increases.
Expenses in 2012 were essentially flat versus 2011 as operational improvements and cost reductions
offset general wage and benefit inflation and higher pension and other postretirement benefits. In
addition, weather related costs increased these expenses in 2011.
Fuel – Fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy
equipment. Lower locomotive diesel fuel prices, which averaged $3.15 per gallon (including taxes and
transportation costs) in 2013, compared to $3.22 in 2012, decreased expenses by $75 million. Volume,
as measured by gross ton-miles, decreased 1% while the fuel consumption rate, computed as gallons of
fuel consumed divided by gross ton-miles, increased 2% compared to 2012. Declines in heavier, more
fuel-efficient coal shipments drove the variances in gross-ton-miles and the fuel consumption rate.
Higher locomotive diesel fuel prices, which averaged $3.22 per gallon (including taxes and transportation
costs) in 2012, compared to $3.12 in 2011, increased expenses by $105 million. Volume, as measured
by gross ton-miles, decreased 2% in 2012 versus 2011, driving expense down. The fuel consumption
rate was flat year-over-year.
Purchased Services and Materials – Expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of
services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers (including equipment
maintenance and contract expenses incurred by our subsidiaries for external transportation services);
materials used to maintain the Railroad’s lines, structures, and equipment; costs of operating facilities
jointly used by UPRR and other railroads; transportation and lodging for train crew employees; trucking
and contracting costs for intermodal containers; leased automobile maintenance expenses; and tools and
29
supplies. Expenses for purchased services increased 10% compared to 2012 due to logistics
management fees, an increase in locomotive overhauls and repairs on jointly owned property.
Expenses for contract services increased $103 million in 2012 versus 2011, primarily due to increased
demand for transportation services purchased by our logistics subsidiaries for their customers and
additional costs for repair and maintenance of locomotives and freight cars.
Depreciation – The majority of depreciation relates to road property, including rail, ties, ballast, and other
track material. Depreciation was up 1% compared to 2012. Recent depreciation studies allowed us to
use longer estimated service lives for certain equipment, which partially offset the impact of a higher
depreciable asset base resulting from larger capital spending in recent years.
A higher depreciable asset base, reflecting ongoing capital spending, increased depreciation expense in
2012 compared to 2011.
Equipment and Other Rents – Equipment and other rents expense primarily includes rental expense that
the Railroad pays for freight cars owned by other railroads or private companies; freight car, intermodal,
and locomotive leases; and office and other rent expenses. Additional container costs resulting from the
logistics management arrangement, and increased automotive shipments, partially offset by lower cycle
times drove a $51 million increase in our short-term freight car rental expense versus 2012. Conversely,
lower locomotive and freight car lease expenses partially offset the higher freight car rental expense.
Increased automotive and intermodal shipments, partially offset by improved car-cycle times, drove an
increase in our short-term freight car rental expense in 2012 compared to 2011. Conversely, lower
locomotive lease expense partially offset the higher freight car rental expense.
Other – Other expenses include state and local taxes, freight, equipment and property damage, utilities,
insurance, personal injury, environmental, employee travel, telephone and cellular, computer software,
bad debt, and other general expenses. Higher property taxes and costs associated with damaged freight
and property increased other costs in 2013 compared to 2012. Continued improvement in our safety
performance and lower estimated liability for personal injury, which reduced our personal injury expense
year-over-year, partially offset increases in other costs.
Other costs in 2012 were slightly higher than 2011 primarily due to higher property taxes. Despite
continual improvement in our safety experience and lower estimated annual costs, personal injury
expense increased in 2012 compared to 2011, as the liability reduction resulting from historical claim
experience was less than the reduction in 2011.
Non-Operating Items
Millions
Other income
Interest expense
Income taxes
$
2013
128
(526)
(2,660)
$
2012
108
(535)
(2,375)
$
2011
112
(572)
(1,972)
% Change
2013 v 2012
% Change
2012 v 2011
19 %
(2)
12 %
(4) %
(6)
20 %
Other Income – Other income increased in 2013 versus 2012 due to higher gains from real estate sales
and increased lease income, including the favorable impact from the $17 million settlement of a land
lease contract. These increases were partially offset by interest received from a tax refund in 2012.
Other income decreased in 2012 versus 2011 due to lower gains from real estate sales and higher
environmental costs associated with non-operating properties, partially offset by interest received from a
tax refund.
Interest Expense – Interest expense decreased in 2013 versus 2012 due to a lower effective interest rate
of 5.7% in 2013 versus 6.0% in 2012. The increase in the weighted-average debt level to $9.6 billion in
2013 from $9.1 billion in 2012 partially offset the impact of the lower effective interest rate.
Interest expense decreased in 2012 versus 2011 reflecting a lower effective interest rate in 2012 of 6.0%
versus 6.2% in 2011 as the debt level did not materially change from 2011 to 2012.
30
Income Taxes – Higher pre-tax income increased income taxes in 2013 compared to 2012. Our effective
tax rate for 2013 was relatively flat at 37.7% compared to 37.6% in 2012.
Income taxes were higher in 2012 compared to 2011, primarily driven by higher pre-tax income. Our
effective tax rate remained relatively flat at 37.6% in 2012 compared to 37.5% in 2011.
OTHER OPERATING/PERFORMANCE AND FINANCIAL STATISTICS
We report a number of key performance measures weekly to the Association of American Railroads
(AAR). We provide this data on our website at www.up.com/investors/reports/index.shtml.
Operating/Performance Statistics
Railroad performance measures are included in the table below:
Average train speed (miles per hour)
Average terminal dwell time (hours)
Gross ton-miles (billions)
Revenue ton-miles (billions)
Operating ratio
Employees (average)
Customer satisfaction index [a]
2013
26.0
27.1
949.1
514.3
66.1
46,445
93
2012
26.5
26.2
959.3
521.1
67.8
45,928
93
2011
25.6
26.2
978.2
544.4
70.7
44,861
92
% Change
2013 v 2012
% Change
2012 v 2011
(2)%
3 %
(1)%
(1)%
(1.7)pts
1 %
- pts
4 %
- %
(2)%
(4)%
(2.9)pts
2 %
1 pt
[a]
As of January 1, 2014, we significantly changed the methodology for compiling our customer satisfaction information and, as a
result, we will not include this index in future reports as no meaningful comparison is available.
Note: Average rail car inventory is no longer being reported as a key railroad performance measure because of recently identified
inaccuracies in the AAR’s calculation for the rail industry, which prevents comparisons to prior reporting periods. The impact of
changes in rail car inventory will be described, as necessary, in connection with our discussion of train speed and/or terminal dwell
metrics.
Average Train Speed – Average train speed is calculated by dividing train miles by hours operated on our
main lines between terminals. Average train speed, as reported to the Association of American Railroads
(AAR), decreased 2% in 2013 versus 2012. The decline was driven by severe weather conditions and
shifts of traffic to sections of our network with higher utilization.
Average train speed increased 4% in 2012 versus 2011. Efficient operations and relatively mild weather
conditions during the year compared favorably to 2011, during which severe winter weather, flooding, and
extreme heat and drought affected various parts of our network. We continued operating a fluid and
efficient network while handling essentially the same volume and adjusting operations to accommodate
increased capital project work on our network compared to 2011.
Average Terminal Dwell Time – Average terminal dwell time is the average time that a rail car spends at
our terminals. Lower average terminal dwell time improves asset utilization and service. Average terminal
dwell time increased 3% primarily due to continuing growth of manifest traffic which requires more time in
terminals for switching cars and building trains. Average terminal dwell time remained flat in 2012
compared to 2011, despite a shift in traffic mix to more manifest shipments, which require more switching
at terminals.
Gross and Revenue Ton-Miles – Gross ton-miles are calculated by multiplying the weight of loaded and
empty freight cars by the number of miles hauled. Revenue ton-miles are calculated by multiplying the
weight of freight by the number of tariff miles. Gross ton-miles and revenue ton-miles declined 1% in
2013 compared to 2012 and carloads remained relatively flat driven by declines in coal and agricultural
products offset by growth in chemical, autos and industrial products. Gross ton-miles declined 2% in 2012
compared to 2011, while revenue ton-miles decreased 4% and carloads remained relatively flat. Changes
in commodity mix drove the year-over-year variances between gross ton-miles, revenue ton-miles and
carloads.
31
Operating Ratio – Operating ratio is our operating expenses reflected as a percentage of operating
revenue. Our operating ratio improved 1.7 points to a new record low of 66.1% in 2013 versus 2012.
Core pricing and productivity gains more than offset the impact of inflation. Our operating ratio improved
2.9 points to a record low of 67.8% in 2012 versus 2011. Core pricing gains, improved fuel recovery
provisions, efficient operations and cost reductions more than offset the impact of inflationary pressures
Employees – Employee levels increased 1% in 2013 versus 2012. Shifts in our traffic mix, which requires
more resources, largely concentrated in the Southern region, work related to higher capital investment in
positive train control and more individuals in the training pipeline contributed to the higher employee
levels. Employee levels increased 2% in 2012 versus 2011. Work related to the increase in capital
investment, including positive train control, accounted for over half of the increase. Additionally, the shift
in our traffic mix required more resources in the Southern region to support the growth in shale-related
shipments.
Customer Satisfaction Index – Our customer satisfaction survey asks customers to rate how satisfied they
are with our performance over the last 12 months on a variety of attributes. A higher score indicates
higher customer satisfaction. As of January 1, 2014, we significantly changed the methodology for
compiling our customer satisfaction information and, as a result, we will not include this index in future
reports as no meaningful comparison is available.
Return on Average Common Shareholders’ Equity
Millions, Except Percentages
Net income
Average equity
Return on average common shareholders' equity
Return on Invested Capital as Adjusted (ROIC)
Millions, Except Percentages
Net income
Add: Interest expense
Add: Interest on present value of operating leases
Less: Taxes on interest
Net operating profit after taxes as adjusted (a)
Average equity
Add: Average debt
Add: Average present value of operating leases
$
$
$
$
$
2013
4,388
20,551
21.4%
2013
4,388
526
175
(264)
4,825
20,551
9,287
3,077
$
$
$
$
$
2012
3,943
19,228
20.5%
2012
3,943
535
190
(273)
4,395
19,228
8,952
3,160
$
$
$
$
$
2011
3,292
18,171
18.1%
2011
3,292
572
208
(293)
3,779
18,171
9,074
3,350
Average invested capital as adjusted (b)
$
32,915
$
31,340
$
30,595
Return on invested capital as adjusted (a/b)
14.7%
14.0%
12.4%
ROIC is considered a non-GAAP financial measure by SEC Regulation G and Item 10 of SEC Regulation
S-K, and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We believe this
measure is important in evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of our long-term capital investments.
In addition, we currently use ROIC as a performance criteria in determining certain elements of equity
compensation for our executives. ROIC should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute
for, other information provided in accordance with GAAP. The most comparable GAAP measure is Return
on Average Common Shareholders’ Equity. The tables above provide reconciliations from return on
average common shareholders’ equity to ROIC. Our 2013 ROIC improved 0.7 points compared to 2012,
primarily as a result of higher earnings.
32
Debt to Capital / Adjusted Debt to Capital
Millions, Except Percentages
Debt (a)
Equity
Capital (b)
Debt to capital (a/b)
Millions, Except Percentages
Debt
Net present value of operating leases
Unfunded pension and OPEB
Adjusted debt (a)
Equity
Adjusted capital (b)
Adjusted debt to capital (a/b)
$
$
$
$
$
2013
9,577
21,225
30,802
31.1%
2013
9,577
3,057
170
12,804
21,225
34,029
37.6%
$
$
$
$
$
2012
8,997
19,877
28,874
31.2%
2012
8,997
3,096
679
12,772
19,877
32,649
39.1%
Adjusted debt to capital is a non-GAAP financial measure under SEC Regulation G and Item 10 of SEC
Regulation S-K, and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We
believe this measure is important to management and investors in evaluating the total amount of leverage
in our capital structure, including off-balance sheet lease obligations, which we generally incur in
connection with financing the acquisition of locomotives and freight cars and certain facilities. Operating
leases were discounted using 5.7% and 6.0% at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The
discount rate reflects our effective interest rate. We monitor the ratio of adjusted debt to capital as we
manage our capital structure to balance cost-effective and efficient access to the capital markets with our
overall cost of capital. Adjusted debt to capital should be considered in addition to, rather than as a
substitute for, debt to capital. The tables above provide reconciliations from debt to capital to adjusted
debt to capital. Our December 31, 2013 debt to capital ratios decreased as a result of a $1.3 billion
increase in equity from December 31, 2012, driven by higher earnings.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of December 31, 2013, our principal sources of liquidity included cash, cash equivalents, our
receivables securitization facility, and our revolving credit facility, as well as the availability of commercial
paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets. We had $1.8 billion of committed credit
available under our credit facility, with no borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2013. We did not
make any borrowings under this facility during 2013. The value of the outstanding undivided interest held
by investors under the $600 million capacity receivables securitization facility was $0 as of December 31,
2013. Amounts outstanding under this facility are included in our Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position as debt due after one year. Our access to this receivables securitization facility may be reduced
or restricted if our bond ratings fall to certain levels below investment grade. If our bond rating were to
deteriorate, it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity. Access to commercial paper as well as other
capital market financings is dependent on market conditions. Deterioration of our operating results or
financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to access capital
markets as a source of liquidity. Access to liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our
financial stability. We expect that we will continue to have access to liquidity through any or all of the
following sources or activities: (i) increasing the size or utilization of our receivables securitization, (ii)
issuing commercial paper, (iii) entering into bank loans, outside of our revolving credit facility, or (iv)
issuing bonds or other debt securities to public or private investors based on our assessment of the
current condition of the credit markets. The Company’s $1.8 billion revolving credit facility is intended to
support the issuance of commercial paper by UPC and also serves as an emergency source of liquidity.
The Company currently does not intend to make any borrowings under this facility.
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had a modest working capital surplus. This reflects a strong cash
position that provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment. In addition, we believe
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements, and we have
sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities.
33
Cash Flows
Millions
Cash provided by operating activities
Cash used in investing activities
Cash used in financing activities
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
Operating Activities
2013
6,823
(3,405)
(3,049)
369
$
$
2012
6,161
(3,633)
(2,682)
$
2011
5,873
(3,119)
(2,623)
(154)
$
131
$
$
Higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012. In addition,
we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations, which reduced cash
provided by operating activities in 2012. Lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation (as discussed
below) partially offset some of the increases.
Higher net income in 2012 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2011, partially
offset by lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation and payments for past wages based on national
labor negotiations settled in 2012.
Federal tax law provided for 100% bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011, and
50% bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012 and 2013. As a result, the Company
deferred a substantial portion of its 2011, 2012 and 2013 income tax expense. This deferral decreased
2011, 2012 and 2013 income tax payments, thereby contributing to the positive operating cash flow. In
future years, however, income tax payments will increase as we pay these previously deferred income
taxes.
Investing Activities
Lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars drove the decrease in cash used in investing
activities compared to 2012.
Higher capital investments in 2012 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to
2011. Included in capital investments in 2012 was $75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives
under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012, which we exercised due to
favorable economic terms and market conditions.
The following tables detail cash capital investments and track statistics for the years ended December 31,
2013, 2012, and 2011:
Millions
Rail and other track material
Ties
Ballast
Other [a]
Total road infrastructure replacements
Line expansion and other capacity projects
Commercial facilities
Total capacity and commercial facilities
Locomotives and freight cars
Positive train control
Technology and other
Total cash capital investments
$
2013
743
438
226
326
1,733
455
146
601
580
419
163
$
2012
759
434
203
312
1,708
489
169
658
875
349
148
$
2011
697
403
220
382
1,702
311
111
422
675
229
148
$
3,496
$
3,738
$
3,176
[a] Other includes bridges and tunnels, signals, other road assets, and road work equipment.
34
Track miles of rail replaced
Track miles of rail capacity expansion
New ties installed (thousands)
Miles of track surfaced
2013
834
97
3,870
11,017
2012
964
139
4,436
11,049
2011
895
69
3,785
11,284
Capital Plan – In 2014, we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $3.9 billion, which
may be revised if business conditions or the regulatory environment affect our ability to generate sufficient
returns on these investments. While the number of our assets replaced will fluctuate as part of our
replacement strategy, for 2014 we expect to use over 60% of our capital investments to replace and
improve existing capital assets. Among our major investment categories are replacing and improving
track infrastructure and upgrading our locomotive, freight car and container fleets, including the
acquisition of 200 locomotives. Additionally, we will continue increasing our network and terminal
capacity, especially in the Southern region, and balancing terminal capacity with more mainline capacity.
Construction of a major rail facility at Santa Teresa, New Mexico, will be completed in 2014 and will
include a run-through and fueling facility as well as an intermodal ramp. We also plan to make significant
investments in technology improvements, including approximately $450 million for PTC.
We expect to fund our 2014 cash capital investments by using some or all of the following: cash
generated from operations, proceeds from the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating
properties, proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, and cash on hand. Our annual capital plan is a
critical component of our long-term strategic plan, which we expect will enhance the long-term value of
the Corporation for our shareholders by providing sufficient resources to (i) replace and improve our
existing track infrastructure to provide safe and fluid operations, (ii) increase network efficiency by adding
or improving facilities and track, and (iii) make investments that meet customer demand and take
advantage of opportunities for long-term growth.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities increased in 2013 versus 2012, driven by a $744 million increase for the
repurchase of shares under our common stock repurchase program and higher dividend payments in
2013 of $1.3 billion compared to $1.1 billion in 2012. We increased our debt levels in 2013, which
partially offset the increase in cash used in financing activities.
Cash used in financing activities increased in 2012 versus 2011. Dividend payments in 2012 increased by
$309 million, reflecting our higher dividend rate, and common stock repurchases increased by $56 million.
Our debt levels did not materially change from 2011 after a decline in debt levels from 2010. Therefore,
less cash was used in 2012 for debt activity than in 2011.
Dividends – On February 6, 2014, we increased the quarterly dividend to $0.91 per share, payable on
April 1, 2014, to shareholders of record on February 28, 2014. We expect to fund the increase in the
quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations and cash on hand at December 31, 2013.
Credit Facilities – On December 31, 2013, we had $1.8 billion of credit available under our revolving
credit facility (the facility), which is designated for general corporate purposes and supports the issuance
of commercial paper. We did not draw on the facility during 2013. Commitment fees and interest rates
payable under the facility are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated, investment-grade
borrowers. The facility allows for borrowings at floating rates based on London Interbank Offered Rates,
plus a spread, depending upon credit ratings for our senior unsecured debt. The facility matures in 2015
under a four year term and requires the Corporation to maintain a debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio as a
condition to making a borrowing. At December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012 (and at all times during
the year), we were in compliance with this covenant.
The definition of debt used for purposes of calculating the debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio includes,
among other things, certain credit arrangements, capital leases, guarantees and unfunded and vested
pension benefits under Title IV of ERISA. At December 31, 2013, the debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio
allowed us to carry up to $42.4 billion of debt (as defined in the facility), and we had $9.9 billion of debt
(as defined in the facility) outstanding at that date. Under our current capital plans, we expect to continue
to satisfy the debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio; however, many factors beyond our reasonable control
35
could affect our ability to comply with this provision in the future. The facility does not include any other
financial restrictions, credit rating triggers (other than rating-dependent pricing), or any other provision
that could require us to post collateral. The facility also includes a $75 million cross-default provision and
a change-of-control provision.
During 2013, we did not issue or repay any commercial paper, and at December 31, 2013, and 2012, we
had no commercial paper outstanding. Our revolving credit facility supports our outstanding commercial
paper balances, and, unless we change the terms of our commercial paper program, our aggregate
issuance of commercial paper will not exceed the amount of borrowings available under the facility.
As of December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, we have reclassified as long-term debt $0 and $100
million, respectively, of debt due within one year that we intend to refinance. This reclassification reflects
our ability and intent to refinance any short-term borrowings and certain current maturities of long-term
debt on a long-term basis.
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
For each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, our ratio of earnings to fixed charges
was 11.8, 10.4, and 8.4, respectively. The ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a
consolidated basis. Earnings represent income from continuing operations, less equity earnings net of
distributions, plus fixed charges and income taxes. Fixed charges represent interest charges,
amortization of debt discount, and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental
charges. (See Exhibit 12 to this report for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges.)
Common Shareholders’ Equity
Dividend Restrictions – Our revolving credit facility includes a debt-to-net worth covenant (discussed in
the Credit Facilities section above) that, under certain circumstances, restricts the payment of cash
dividends to our shareholders. The amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $16.3 billion
and $15.1 billion at December 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
Share Repurchase Program
Effective April 1, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 40 million shares of our
common stock by March 31, 2014, replacing our previous repurchase program. As of December 31,
2013, we repurchased a total of $9.3 billion of our common stock since the commencement of our
repurchase programs. The table below represents shares repurchased under this repurchase program.
First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
2012
3,917,369
3,770,528
3,098,812
2,033,750
2013
2,881,400
3,061,470
3,666,894
4,929,055
$
$
Average Price Paid
2012
110.64
110.02
122.13
121.81
2013
136.58
151.42
156.77
159.36
14,538,819
12,820,459
$
152.52
$
115.01
On November 21, 2013, our Board of Directors approved the early renewal of the share repurchase
program, authorizing the repurchase of up to 60 million shares of our common stock by December 31,
2017. The new authorization was effective January 1, 2014, and replaces the previous authorization,
which expired on December 31, 2013, three months earlier than its original expiration date.
Management's assessments of market conditions and other pertinent facts guide the timing and volume
of all repurchases. We expect to fund any share repurchases under this program through cash generated
from operations, the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties, debt issuances, and
cash on hand. Repurchased shares are recorded in treasury stock at cost, which includes any applicable
commissions and fees.
Shelf Registration Statement and Significant New Borrowings – We filed an automatic shelf
registration statement that became effective on February 8, 2013. The Board of Directors authorized the
36
issuance of up to $4 billion of debt securities, replacing the $1.4 billion of authority remaining under our
shelf registration filed in February 2010. SEC rules require UPC, a large accelerated filer, to file a new
shelf registration statement every three years. Under the current shelf registration, we may issue, from
time to time, any combination of debt securities, preferred stock, common stock, or warrants for debt
securities or preferred stock in one or more offerings. We have no immediate plans to issue equity
securities; however, we will continue to explore opportunities to replace existing debt or access capital
through issuances of debt securities under our shelf registration, and, therefore, we may issue additional
debt securities at any time.
During 2013, we issued the following unsecured, fixed-rate debt securities under our current shelf
registration:
Date
March 15, 2013
October 25, 2013
Description of Securities
$325 million of 2.75% Notes due April 15, 2023
$325 million of 4.25% Notes due April 15, 2043
$500 million of 4.75% Notes due December 15, 2043
We used the net proceeds from the offerings for general corporate purposes, including the repurchase of
common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program. These debt securities include change-of-
control provisions. At December 31, 2013, we had remaining authority to issue up to $2.85 billion of debt
securities under our shelf registration.
In May 2012, we borrowed $100 million under a 4-year-term bank loan (the loan). The loan has a floating
rate based on London Interbank Offered Rates, plus a spread, and is prepayable in whole or in part
without a premium prior to maturity. The agreement documenting the loan has provisions similar to our
revolving credit facility, including identical debt-to-net-worth covenant and change of control provisions
and similar customary default provisions. The agreement does not include any other financial restrictions,
credit rating triggers, or any other provision that would require us to post collateral.
Subsequent Event – In 2014, we issued the following unsecured, fixed-rate debt securities under our
current shelf registration:
Date
January 10, 2014
Description of Securities
$300 million of 2.25% Notes due February 15, 2019
$400 million of 3.75% Notes due March 15, 2024
$300 million of 4.85% Notes due June 15, 2044
Proceeds from this offering are for general corporate purposes, including the repurchase of common
stock pursuant to our share repurchase program. These debt securities include change-of-control
provisions. As of February 7, 2014, we had remaining authority from our Board of Directors to issue up to
$1.85 billion of debt securities under our shelf registration.
Debt Exchange – On August 21, 2013, we exchanged $1,170 million of various outstanding notes and
debentures due between 2016 and 2040 (Existing Notes) for $439 million of 3.646% notes (New 2024
Notes) due February 15, 2024 and $700 million of 4.821% notes (New 2044 Notes) due February 1,
2044, plus cash consideration of approximately $280 million in addition to $8 million for accrued and
unpaid interest on the Existing Notes. In accordance with ASC 470-50-40, Debt-Modifications and
Extinguishments-Derecognition, this transaction was accounted for as a debt exchange, as the
exchanged debt instruments are not considered to be substantially different. The cash consideration was
recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of debt, and the balance of the unamortized discount and
issue costs from the Existing Notes is being amortized as an adjustment of interest expense over the
terms of the New 2024 Notes and the New 2044 Notes. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of the
exchange. Costs related to the debt exchange that were payable to parties other than the debt holders
totaled approximately $9 million and were included in interest expense during the three months ended
September 30, 2013.
37
The following table lists the outstanding notes and debentures that were exchanged:
Millions
The 2024 Offers
7.000% Debentures due 2016
5.650% Notes due 2017
5.750% Notes due 2017
5.700% Notes due 2018
7.875% Notes due 2019
6.125% Notes due 2020
The 2044 Offers
7.125% Debentures due 2028
6.625% Debentures due 2029
6.250% Debentures due 2034
6.150% Debentures due 2037
5.780% Notes due 2040
Total
Principal amount
exchanged
$
8
38
70
103
20
238
73
177
19
138
286
$
1,170
Debt Redemptions – On May 14, 2013, we redeemed all $40 million of our outstanding 5.65% Port of
Corpus Christi Authority Revenue Refunding Bonds due December 1, 2022. The redemption resulted in
an early extinguishment charge of $1 million in the second quarter of 2013.
On November 30, 2012, we redeemed all $450 million of our outstanding 5.45% notes due January 31,
2013. The redemption resulted in an early extinguishment charge of $4 million in the fourth quarter of
2012.
On April 28, 2012, we redeemed all $100 million of our outstanding 5.70% Tooele County, Utah
Hazardous Waste Treatment Revenue Bonds due November 1, 2026. The redemption resulted in an
early extinguishment charge of $2 million in the second quarter of 2012.
On December 19, 2011, we redeemed the remaining $175 million of our 6.5% notes due April 15, 2012,
and all $300 million of our outstanding 6.125% notes due January 15, 2012. The redemptions resulted in
an early extinguishment charge of $5 million in the fourth quarter of 2011.
Receivables Securitization Facility – The Railroad maintains a $600 million, 364-day receivables
securitization facility under which it sells most of its eligible third-party receivables to Union Pacific
Receivables, Inc. (UPRI), a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary that may subsequently transfer,
without recourse an undivided interest in accounts receivable to investors. The investors have no
recourse to the Railroad’s other assets except for customary warranty and indemnity claims. Creditors of
the Railroad do not have recourse to the assets of UPRI.
The amount outstanding under the facility was $0 and $100 million at December 31, 2013, and December
31, 2012, respectively. The facility was supported by $1.1 billion of accounts receivable as collateral at
both December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, which, as a retained interest, is included in accounts
receivable, net in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
The outstanding amount the Railroad is allowed to maintain under the facility, with a maximum of $600
million, may fluctuate based on the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by business
volumes and credit risks, including receivables payment quality measures such as default and dilution
ratios. If default or dilution ratios increase one percent, the allowable outstanding amount under the
facility would not materially change.
The costs of the receivables securitization facility include interest, which will vary based on prevailing
commercial paper rates, program fees paid to banks, commercial paper issuing costs, and fees for
unused commitment availability. The costs of the receivables securitization facility are included in interest
expense and were $5 million, $3 million and $4 million for 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
38
In July 2013, the $600 million receivables securitization facility was renewed for an additional 364-day
period at comparable terms and conditions.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
As described in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and as referenced in the tables
below, we have contractual obligations and commercial commitments that may affect our financial
condition. Based on our assessment of the underlying provisions and circumstances of our contractual
obligations and commercial commitments, including material sources of off-balance sheet and structured
finance arrangements, other than the risks that we and other similarly situated companies face with
respect to the condition of the capital markets (as described in Item 1A of Part II of this report), there is
no known trend, demand, commitment, event, or uncertainty that is reasonably likely to occur that would
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. In
addition, our commercial obligations, financings, and commitments are customary transactions that are
similar to those of other comparable corporations, particularly within the transportation industry.
The following tables identify material obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2013:
Payments Due by December 31,
Contractual Obligations
Millions
Debt [a]
Operating leases [b]
Capital lease obligations [c]
Purchase obligations [d]
Other post retirement benefits [e]
Income tax contingencies [f]
Total
$ 14,504 $
4,066
2,200
4,122
436
59
2014
926 $
512
272
2,063
41
25
2015
654 $
477
260
495
42
-
2016
783 $
438
239
403
43
-
2017
816 $
400
247
324
44
-
2018
722 $ 10,603 $
332
225
221
45
-
After
2018 Other
-
-
-
32
-
34
1,907
957
584
221
-
Total contractual obligations
$ 25,387 $ 3,839 $ 1,928 $ 1,906 $ 1,831 $ 1,545 $ 14,272 $
66
[a] Excludes capital lease obligations of $1,702 million and unamortized discount of $(604) million. Includes an interest
component of $6,025 million.
Includes leases for locomotives, freight cars, other equipment, and real estate.
[b]
[c] Represents total obligations, including interest component of $498 million.
[e]
[d] Purchase obligations include locomotive maintenance contracts; purchase commitments for fuel purchases, locomotives,
ties, ballast, and rail; and agreements to purchase other goods and services. For amounts where we cannot reasonably
estimate the year of settlement, they are reflected in the Other column.
Includes estimated other post retirement, medical, and life insurance payments, payments made under the unfunded pension
plan for the next ten years.
Future cash flows for income tax contingencies reflect the recorded liabilities and assets for unrecognized tax benefits,
including interest and penalties, as of December 31, 2013. For amounts where the year of settlement is uncertain, they are
reflected in the Other column.
[f]
Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period
Other Commercial Commitments
Millions
Credit facilities [a]
Receivables securitization facility [b]
Guarantees [c]
Standby letters of credit [d]
Total
$ 1,800 $
600
299
26
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
- $ 1,800 $
600
214
22
-
12
4
- $
-
30
-
- $
-
10
-
- $
-
11
-
After
2018
-
-
22
-
Total commercial commitments
$ 2,725 $
836 $ 1,816 $
30 $
10 $
11 $
22
[a] None of the credit facility was used as of December 31, 2013.
[b] None of the receivables securitization facility was utilized at December 31, 2013. The full program matures in July 2014.
[c]
Includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building, equipment financings, and affiliated operations.
[d] None of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of December 31, 2013.
39
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Guarantees – At December 31, 2013, and 2012, we were contingently liable for $299 million and $307
million in guarantees. We have recorded a liability of $1 million and $2 million for the fair value of these
obligations as of December 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively. We entered into these contingent
guarantees in the normal course of business, and they include guaranteed obligations related to our
headquarters building, equipment financings, and affiliated operations. The final guarantee expires in
2022. We are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees.
We do not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
OTHER MATTERS
Labor Agreements – Approximately 86% of our 46,445 full-time-equivalent employees are represented
by 14 major rail unions. In 2012, we concluded the most recent round of negotiations, which began in
2010, with the ratification of new agreements by several unions. All of the unions executed similar multi-
year agreements that provide for higher employee cost sharing of employee health and welfare benefits
and higher wages. The current agreements will remain in effect until renegotiated under provisions of the
Railway Labor Act. The next round of negotiations will begin in early 2015.
Inflation – Long periods of inflation significantly increase asset replacement costs for capital-intensive
companies. As a result, assuming that we replace all operating assets at current price levels, depreciation
charges (on an inflation-adjusted basis) would be substantially greater than historically reported amounts.
Derivative Financial Instruments – We may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances to
assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices. We are not a party
to leveraged derivatives and, by policy, do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative
purposes. Derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level
of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged, both at inception and
throughout the hedged period. We formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging
instruments and hedged items at inception, as well as our risk-management objectives, strategies for
undertaking the various hedge transactions, and method of assessing hedge effectiveness. Changes in
the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are
charged to earnings. We may use swaps, collars, futures, and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of
adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices; however, the use of these derivative financial
instruments may limit future benefits from favorable price movements.
Market and Credit Risk – We address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting
instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item. We manage
credit risk related to derivative financial instruments, which is minimal, by requiring high credit standards
for counterparties and periodic settlements. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, we were not required to
provide collateral, nor had we received collateral, relating to our hedging activities.
Determination of Fair Value – We determine the fair values of our derivative financial instrument
positions based upon current fair values as quoted by recognized dealers or the present value of
expected future cash flows.
Sensitivity Analyses – The sensitivity analyses that follow illustrate the economic effect that hypothetical
changes in interest rates could have on our results of operations and financial condition. These
hypothetical changes do not consider other factors that could impact actual results.
At December 31, 2013, we had variable-rate debt representing approximately 2.2% of our total debt. If
variable interest rates average one percentage point higher in 2014 than our December 31, 2013 variable
rate, which was approximately 0.9%, our interest expense would increase by approximately $2 million.
This amount was determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rate on the balances
of our variable-rate debt at December 31, 2013.
Market risk for fixed-rate debt is estimated as the potential increase in fair value resulting from a
hypothetical one percentage point decrease in interest rates as of December 31, 2013, and amounts to
an increase of approximately $1 billion to the fair value of our debt at December 31, 2013. We estimated
the fair values of our fixed-rate debt by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on quoted
market prices and current borrowing rates.
40
Interest Rate Fair Value Hedges – We manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by
adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given
period. We generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted
amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings. We employ derivatives,
primarily swaps, as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix. In addition, we also obtain flexibility in
managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of
and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities.
Swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in
the debt’s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates. We account for swaps as fair value
hedges using the short-cut method as allowed by the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ASC; therefore, we do not record any ineffectiveness within our
Consolidated Financial Statements. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had no interest rate fair
value hedges outstanding.
Interest Rate Cash Flow Hedges – We report changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges in
accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged item affects earnings. At both December 31,
2013, and 2012, we had reductions of $1 million recorded as an accumulated other comprehensive loss
that is being amortized on a straight-line basis through September 30, 2014. As of December 31, 2013,
and 2012, we had no interest rate cash flow hedges outstanding.
Accounting Pronouncements – On February 5, 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (ASU
2013-02), which adds additional disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other
comprehensive income. We adopted this ASU during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Asserted and Unasserted Claims – Various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of
our subsidiaries. We cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our
consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity; however, to the extent possible, where
asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably
estimated, we have recorded a liability. We do not expect that any known lawsuits, claims, environmental
costs, commitments, contingent liabilities, or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and
insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters.
Indemnities – Our maximum potential exposure under indemnification arrangements, including certain
tax indemnifications, can range from a specified dollar amount to an unlimited amount, depending on the
nature of the transactions and the agreements. Due to uncertainty as to whether claims will be made or
how they will be resolved, we cannot reasonably determine the probability of an adverse claim or
reasonably estimate any adverse liability or the total maximum exposure under these indemnification
arrangements. We do not have any reason to believe that we will be required to make any material
payments under these indemnity provisions.
Climate Change – Although climate change could have an adverse impact on our operations and
financial performance in the future (see Risk Factors under Item 1A of this report), we are currently
unable to predict the manner or severity of such impact. However, we continue to take steps and explore
opportunities to reduce the impact of our operations on the environment, including investments in new
technologies, using training programs to reduce fuel consumption, and changing our operations to
increase fuel efficiency.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation
of these financial statements requires estimation and judgment that affect the reported amounts of
revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. The following critical accounting policies are a subset of our significant
accounting policies described in Note 2 to the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8.
These critical accounting policies affect significant areas of our financial statements and involve judgment
41
and estimates. If these estimates differ significantly from actual results, the impact on our Consolidated
Financial Statements may be material.
Personal Injury – The cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is
charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year. We use
an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability, including unasserted claims. The Federal
Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) governs compensation for work-related accidents. Under FELA, damages
are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements. We offer a
comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work.
Our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the
timing of future payments. Approximately 92% of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and
approximately 8% is related to unasserted claims at December 31, 2013. Because of the uncertainty
surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims, it is reasonably possible that future costs to
settle these claims may range from approximately $294 million to $322 million. We record an accrual at
the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other.
Estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation.
Our personal injury liability activity was as follows:
Millions
Beginning balance
Current year accruals
Changes in estimates for prior years
Payments
Ending balance at December 31
Current portion, ending balance at December 31
Our personal injury claims activity was as follows:
Open claims, beginning balance
New claims
Settled or dismissed claims
Open claims, ending balance at December 31
2013
334
87
(38)
(89)
294
82
$
$
$
2012
368
121
(58)
(97)
334
95
$
$
$
2011
426
118
(71)
(105)
368
103
$
$
$
2013
2,792
2,705
(2,892)
2012
2,869
2,719
(2,796)
2011
3,151
2,781
(3,063)
2,605
2,792
2,869
Asbestos – We are a defendant in a number of lawsuits in which current and former employees and
other parties allege exposure to asbestos. We assess our potential liability using a statistical analysis of
resolution costs for asbestos-related claims. This liability is updated annually and excludes future
defense and processing costs. The liability for resolving both asserted and unasserted claims was based
on the following assumptions:
The ratio of future claims by alleged disease would be consistent with historical averages
adjusted for inflation.
The number of claims filed against us will decline each year.
The average settlement values for asserted and unasserted claims will be equivalent to historical
averages.
The percentage of claims dismissed in the future will be equivalent to historical averages.
Our liability for asbestos-related claims is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty
surrounding the timing of future payments. Approximately 18% of the recorded liability related to asserted
claims and approximately 82% related to unasserted claims at December 31, 2013. Because of the
uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of asbestos-related claims, it is reasonably possible that
future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $131 million to $141 million. We record
an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any
other.
42
Our asbestos-related liability activity was as follows:
Millions
Beginning balance
Accruals/(Credits)
Payments
Ending balance at December 31
Current portion, ending balance at December 31
Our asbestos-related claims activity was as follows:
Open claims, beginning balance
New claims
Settled or dismissed claims
Open claims, ending balance at December 31
2013
139
2
(10)
131
9
$
$
$
2012
147
(2)
(6)
139
8
$
$
$
2011
162
(5)
(10)
147
8
$
$
$
2013
1,258
192
(310)
1,140
2012
1,291
233
(266)
1,258
2011
1,437
235
(381)
1,291
In conjunction with the liability update performed in 2013, we also reassessed estimated insurance
recoveries. We have recognized an asset for estimated insurance recoveries at December 31, 2013, and
2012. The amounts recorded for asbestos-related liabilities and related insurance recoveries were based
on currently known facts. However, future events, such as the number of new claims filed each year,
average settlement costs, and insurance coverage issues, could cause the actual costs and insurance
recoveries to be higher or lower than the projected amounts. Estimates also may vary in the future if
strategies, activities, and outcomes of asbestos litigation materially change; federal and state laws
governing asbestos litigation increase or decrease the probability or amount of compensation of
claimants; and there are material changes with respect to payments made to claimants by other
defendants.
Environmental Costs – We are subject to federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations.
We have identified 268 sites at which we are or may be liable for remediation costs associated with
alleged contamination or for violations of environmental requirements. This includes 33 sites that are the
subject of actions taken by the U.S. government, 17 of which are currently on the Superfund National
Priorities List. Certain federal legislation imposes joint and several liability for the remediation of identified
sites; consequently, our ultimate environmental liability may include costs relating to activities of other
parties, in addition to costs relating to our own activities at each site.
When we identify an environmental issue with respect to property owned, leased, or otherwise used in
our business, we perform, with assistance of our consultants, environmental assessments on the
property. We expense the cost of the assessments as incurred. We accrue the cost of remediation where
our obligation is probable and such costs can be reasonably estimated. We do not discount our
environmental liabilities when the timing of the anticipated cash payments is not fixed or readily
determinable. At December 31, 2013, and 2012, none of our environmental liability was discounted, while
less than 1% of our environmental liability was discounted at 2.0% at December 31, 2011.
Our environmental liability activity was as follows:
Millions
Beginning balance
Accruals
Payments
Ending balance at December 31
Current portion, ending balance at December 31
[a] Payments include $25 million to resolve the Omaha Lead Site liability.
2013
170
58
(57)
171
53
$
$
$
2012
172
48
(50)
170
50
$
$
$
2011 [a]
213
$
29
(70)
$
$
172
50
43
Our environmental site activity was as follows:
Open sites, beginning balance
New sites
Closed sites
Open sites, ending balance at December 31
2013
284
41
(57)
268
2012
285
56
(57)
284
2011
294
51
(60)
285
The environmental liability includes future costs for remediation and restoration of sites, as well as
ongoing monitoring costs, but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties. Cost estimates are
based on information available for each site, financial viability of other potentially responsible parties, and
existing technology, laws, and regulations. The ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine
because of the number of potentially responsible parties, site-specific cost sharing arrangements with
other potentially responsible parties, the degree of contamination by various wastes, the scarcity and
quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites, and the speculative nature of remediation costs.
Estimates of liability may vary over time due to changes in federal, state, and local laws governing
environmental remediation. Current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.
Property and Depreciation – Our railroad operations are highly capital intensive, and our large base of
homogeneous, network-type assets turns over on a continuous basis. Each year we develop a capital
program for the replacement of assets and for the acquisition or construction of assets that enable us to
enhance our operations or provide new service offerings to customers. Assets purchased or constructed
throughout the year are capitalized if they meet applicable minimum units of property criteria. Properties
and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated
service lives, which are measured in years, except for rail in high-density traffic corridors (i.e., all rail lines
except for those subject to abandonment, yard and switching tracks, and electronic yards) for which lives
are measured in millions of gross tons per mile of track. We use the group method of depreciation in
which all items with similar characteristics, use, and expected lives are grouped together in asset classes,
and are depreciated using composite depreciation rates. The group method of depreciation treats each
asset class as a pool of resources, not as singular items. We currently have more than 60 depreciable
asset classes, and we may increase or decrease the number of asset classes due to changes in
technology, asset strategies, or other factors.
We determine the estimated service lives of depreciable railroad property by means of depreciation
studies. We perform depreciation studies at least every three years for equipment and every six years for
track assets (i.e., rail and other track material, ties, and ballast) and other road property. Our depreciation
studies take into account the following factors:
Statistical analysis of historical patterns of use and retirements of each of our asset classes;
Evaluation of any expected changes in current operations and the outlook for continued use of
the assets;
Evaluation of technological advances and changes to maintenance practices; and
Expected salvage to be received upon retirement.
For rail in high-density traffic corridors, we measure estimated service lives in millions of gross tons per
mile of track. It has been our experience that the lives of rail in high-density traffic corridors are closely
correlated to usage (i.e., the amount of weight carried over the rail). The service lives also vary based on
rail weight, rail condition (e.g., new or secondhand), and rail type (e.g., straight or curve). Our
depreciation studies for rail in high density traffic corridors consider each of these factors in determining
the estimated service lives. For rail in high-density traffic corridors, we calculate depreciation rates
annually by dividing the number of gross ton-miles carried over the rail (i.e., the weight of loaded and
empty freight cars, locomotives and maintenance of way equipment transported over the rail) by the
estimated service lives of the rail measured in millions of gross tons per mile. Rail in high-density traffic
corridors accounts for approximately 70 percent of the historical cost of rail and other track material.
Based on the number of gross ton-miles carried over our rail in high density traffic corridors during 2013,
the estimated service lives of the majority of this rail ranged from approximately 15 years to approximately
30 years. For all other depreciable assets, we compute depreciation based on the estimated service lives
44
of our assets as determined from the analysis of our depreciation studies. Changes in the estimated
service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively.
Estimated service lives of depreciable railroad property may vary over time due to changes in physical
use, technology, asset strategies, and other factors that will have an impact on the retirement profiles of
our assets. We are not aware of any specific factors that are reasonably likely to significantly change the
estimated service lives of our assets. Actual use and retirement of our assets may vary from our current
estimates, which would impact the amount of depreciation expense recognized in future periods.
Changes in estimated useful lives of our assets due to the results of our depreciation studies could
significantly impact future periods’ depreciation expense and have a material impact on our Consolidated
Financial Statements. If the estimated useful lives of all depreciable assets were increased by one year,
annual depreciation expense would decrease by approximately $59 million. If the estimated useful lives
of all depreciable assets were decreased by one year, annual depreciation expense would increase by
approximately $63 million. Our recent depreciation studies have resulted in changes in depreciation rates
for some asset classes but did not significantly affect our annual depreciation expense.
Under group depreciation, the historical cost (net of salvage) of depreciable property that is retired or
replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is
recognized. The historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using (i) inflation indices published by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics and (ii) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our
depreciation studies. The indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of
the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes. Because of the number of estimates
inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate
each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired, we continually monitor the
estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class
to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate. In addition, we determine if the recorded amount of
accumulated depreciation is deficient (or in excess) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies.
Any deficiency (or excess) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining
service lives of the applicable classes of assets.
For retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business, a
gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions: (i) is
unusual, (ii) is material in amount, and (iii) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through
our depreciation studies. During the last three fiscal years, no gains or losses were recognized due to the
retirement of depreciable railroad properties. A gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell
land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations.
Income Taxes – We account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current
year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have
been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. These expected future tax consequences are
measured based on current tax law; the effects of future tax legislation are not anticipated. Future tax
legislation, such as a change in the corporate tax rate, could have a material impact on our financial
condition, results of operations, or liquidity. For example, a 1% increase in future income tax rates would
increase our deferred tax liability by approximately $370 million.
When appropriate, we record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets to reflect that these tax
assets may not be realized. In determining whether a valuation allowance is appropriate, we consider
whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized,
based on management’s judgments using available evidence for purposes of estimating whether future
taxable income will be sufficient to realize a deferred tax asset. In 2013 and 2012, there were no valuation
allowances.
We recognize tax benefits that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax
authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50
percent likely to be realized upon settlement. A liability for “unrecognized tax benefits” is recorded for any
tax benefits claimed in our tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits – We use an actuarial analysis to measure the liabilities
and expenses associated with providing pension and medical and life insurance benefits (OPEB) to
eligible employees. In order to use actuarial methods to value the liabilities and expenses, we must make
45
several assumptions. The critical assumptions used to measure pension obligations and expenses are
the discount rate and expected rate of return on pension assets. For OPEB, the critical assumptions are
the discount rate and health care cost trend rate.
We evaluate our critical assumptions at least annually, and selected assumptions are based on the
following factors:
Discount rate is based on a Mercer yield curve of high quality corporate bonds (rated AA by a
recognized rating agency) for which the timing and amount of cash flows matches our plans’
expected benefit payments.
Expected return on plan assets is based on our asset allocation mix and our historical return,
taking into consideration current and expected market conditions.
Health care cost trend rate is based on our historical rates of inflation and expected market
conditions.
The following tables present the key assumptions used to measure net periodic pension and OPEB
cost/(benefit) for 2013 and the estimated impact on 2013 net periodic pension and OPEB cost/(benefit)
relative to a change in those assumptions:
Assumptions
Discount rate
Expected return on plan assets
Compensation increase
Health care cost trend rate:
Pre-65 current
Pre-65 level in 2028
Sensitivities
Millions
0.25% decrease in discount rate
0.25% increase in compensation scale
0.25% decrease in expected return on plan assets
1% increase in health care cost trend rate
Pension
3.78%
7.50%
3.43%
N/A
N/A
OPEB
3.48%
N/A
N/A
6.64%
4.50%
Increase in Expense
OPEB
Pension
$
$
$
9
5
7
N/A
$
$
1
N/A
N/A
3
The following table presents the net periodic pension and OPEB cost/(benefit) for the years ended
December 31:
Millions
Net periodic pension cost
Net periodic OPEB cost/(benefit)
Est.
2014
65
15
$
2013
2012
2011
$ 110
$
14
$
89
13
78
(6)
Our net periodic pension cost is expected to decrease to approximately $65 million in 2014 from $110
million in 2013. The decrease is driven mainly by an increase in the discount rate to 4.72%, Our net
periodic OPEB expense is expected to increase to approximately $15 million in 2014 from $14 million in
2013. The increase in our net periodic OPEB cost is primarily driven by a decrease in the amortization of
prior service credits from accumulated other comprehensive income.
CAUTIONARY INFORMATION
Certain statements in this report, and statements in other reports or information filed or to be filed with the
SEC (as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made
by us), are, or will be, forward-looking statements as defined by the Securities Act of 1933 and the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements and information include, without
limitation, (A) statements in the CEO’s letter preceding Part I; statements regarding planned capital
expenditures under the caption “2014 Capital Expenditures” in Item 2 of Part I; statements regarding
dividends in Item 5; and statements and information set forth under the captions “2014 Outlook” and
“Liquidity and Capital Resources” in this Item 7, and (B) any other statements or information in this report
46
(including information incorporated herein by reference) regarding: expectations as to financial
performance, revenue growth and cost savings; the time by which goals, targets, or objectives will be
achieved; projections, predictions, expectations, estimates, or forecasts as to our business, financial and
operational results, future economic performance, and general economic conditions; expectations as to
operational or service performance or improvements; expectations as to the effectiveness of steps taken
or to be taken to improve operations and/or service, including capital expenditures for infrastructure
improvements and equipment acquisitions, any strategic business acquisitions, and modifications to our
transportation plans; expectations as to existing or proposed new products and services; expectations as
to the impact of any new regulatory activities or legislation on our operations or financial results;
estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration; estimates and expectations
regarding tax matters; expectations that claims, litigation, environmental costs, commitments, contingent
liabilities, labor negotiations or agreements, or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity and any other similar expressions
concerning matters that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements may be identified by their
use of forward-looking terminology, such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “should,” “would,” “will,”
“intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “projects” and similar words, phrases or expressions.
Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will
not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that, or by which, such performance or results will be
achieved. Forward-looking statements and information are subject to risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements and
information. Forward-looking statements and information reflect the good faith consideration by
management of currently available information, and may be based on underlying assumptions believed to
be reasonable under the circumstances. However, such information and assumptions (and, therefore,
such forward-looking statements and information) are or may be subject to variables or unknown or
unforeseeable events or circumstances over which management has little or no influence or control. The
Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report could affect our future results and could cause those results or other
outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements or
information. To the extent circumstances require or we deem it otherwise necessary, we will update or
amend these risk factors in a Form 10-Q, Form 8-K or subsequent Form 10-K. All forward-looking
statements are qualified by, and should be read in conjunction with, these Risk Factors.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made. We assume no obligation
to update forward-looking information to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in
other factors affecting forward-looking information. If we do update one or more forward-looking
statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect thereto or
with respect to other forward-looking statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Information concerning market risk sensitive instruments is set forth under Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Other Matters, Item 7.
****************************************
47
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm .............................................................. 49
Consolidated Statements of Income
For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 ........................................................ 50
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 ........................................................ 50
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
At December 31, 2013 and 2012 ................................................................................................. 51
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 ........................................................ 52
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Shareholders’ Equity
For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 ........................................................ 53
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements .............................................................................. 54
48
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Union Pacific Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Union Pacific
Corporation and Subsidiary Companies (the Corporation) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the
related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in common shareholders’
equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. Our audits
also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Table of Contents at Part IV, Item 15. These
financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Corporation’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,
based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 7,
2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
Omaha, Nebraska
February 7, 2014
49
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Millions, Except Per Share Amounts,
for the Years Ended December 31,
Operating revenues:
Freight revenues
Other revenues
Total operating revenues
Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits
Fuel
Purchased services and materials
Depreciation
Equipment and other rents
Other
Total operating expenses
Operating income
Other income (Note 6)
Interest expense
Income before income taxes
Income taxes (Note 7)
Net income
Share and Per Share (Note 8):
Earnings per share - basic
Earnings per share - diluted
Weighted average number of shares - basic
Weighted average number of shares - diluted
Dividends declared per share
2013
2012
2011
$
20,684 $ 19,686 $ 18,508
1,049
1,240
1,279
21,963
20,926
19,557
4,807
3,534
2,315
1,777
1,235
849
4,685
3,608
2,143
1,760
1,197
788
4,681
3,581
2,005
1,617
1,167
782
14,517
14,181
13,833
7,446
128
(526)
7,048
(2,660)
6,745
108
(535)
6,318
(2,375)
5,724
112
(572)
5,264
(1,972)
4,388 $
3,943 $
3,292
9.47 $
9.42 $
8.33 $
8.27 $
463.3
465.8
473.1
476.5
6.78
6.72
485.7
489.8
2.96 $
2.49 $
1.93
$
$
$
$
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Millions,
for the Years Ended December 31,
Net income
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Defined benefit plans
Foreign currency translation
Derivatives
Total other comprehensive income/(loss) [a]
2013
2012
2011
$
4,388 $
3,943 $
3,292
436
(1)
1
436
(145)
12
1
(132)
(301)
(20)
1
(320)
Comprehensive income
$
4,824 $
3,811 $
2,972
[a] Net of deferred taxes of ($264) million, $82 million, and $199 million during 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
50
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Millions, Except Share and Per Share Amounts
as of December 31,
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, net (Note 10)
Materials and supplies
Current deferred income taxes (Note 7)
Other current assets
Total current assets
Investments
Net properties (Note 11)
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Common Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and other current liabilities (Note 12)
Debt due within one year (Note 14)
Total current liabilities
Debt due after one year (Note 14)
Deferred income taxes (Note 7)
Other long-term liabilities
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 16 and 17)
Total liabilities
Common shareholders' equity:
Common shares, $2.50 par value, 800,000,000 authorized;
554,828,826 and 554,558,034 issued; 456,000,998 and 469,465,273
outstanding, respectively
Paid-in-surplus
Retained earnings
Treasury stock
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 9)
Total common shareholders' equity
2013
2012
$
1,432 $
1,414
653
268
223
3,990
1,321
43,749
671
1,063
1,331
660
263
297
3,614
1,259
41,997
283
$
49,731 $
47,153
$
3,086 $
705
3,791
8,872
14,163
1,680
2,923
196
3,119
8,801
13,108
2,248
28,506
27,276
1,387
4,210
25,288
(8,910)
(750)
21,225
1,386
4,113
22,271
(6,707)
(1,186)
19,877
Total liabilities and common shareholders' equity
$
49,731 $
47,153
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
51
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Millions, for the Years Ended December 31,
Operating Activities
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation
Deferred income taxes and unrecognized tax benefits
Other operating activities, net
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net
Materials and supplies
Other current assets
Accounts payable and other current liabilities
Cash provided by operating activities
Investing Activities
Capital investments
Proceeds from asset sales
Acquisition of equipment pending financing
Proceeds from sale of assets financed
Other investing activities, net
Cash used in investing activities
Financing Activities
Common share repurchases (Note 18)
Debt issued
Dividends paid
Debt repaid
Debt exchange
Other financing activities, net
Cash used in financing activities
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Cash dividends declared but not yet paid
Capital investments accrued but not yet paid
Capital lease financings
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
Income taxes, net of refunds
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
2013
2012
2011
$ 4,388
$ 3,943
$ 3,292
1,777
723
(226)
(83)
7
74
163
6,823
(3,496)
98
-
-
(7)
(3,405)
1,760
887
(160)
70
(46)
(108)
(185)
6,161
(3,738)
80
(274)
274
25
(3,633)
(2,218)
1,443
(1,333)
(640)
(289)
(12)
(3,049)
369
1,063
$ 1,432
(1,474)
695
(1,146)
(758)
-
1
(2,682)
(154)
1,217
$ 1,063
$
$
356
133
39
318
136
290
$
(528)
(1,656)
$
(561)
(1,552)
1,617
986
(298)
(217)
(80)
178
395
5,873
(3,176)
108
(85)
85
(51)
(3,119)
(1,418)
486
(837)
(690)
(272)
108
(2,623)
131
1,086
$ 1,217
$
$
284
147
154
(572)
(625)
52
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Millions
Balance at January 1, 2011
Net income
Other comp. loss
Conversion, stock option
exercises, forfeitures, and other
Share repurchases (Note 18)
Cash dividends declared
($1.93 per share)
Balance at December 31, 2011
Net income
Other comp. loss
Conversion, stock option
exercises, forfeitures, and other
Share repurchases (Note 18)
Cash dividends declared
($2.49 per share)
Balance at December 31, 2012
Net income
Other comp. income
Conversion, stock option
exercises, forfeitures, and other
Share repurchases (Note 18)
Cash dividends declared
($2.96 per share)
Common
Shares
553.9
Treasury
Shares
(62.3)
Retained
Paid-in-
Common
Shares
Earnings
Surplus
$ 1,385 $ 3,985 $ 17,154
3,292
-
-
-
-
-
Treasury
Stock
$ (4,027)
-
-
AOCI
[a]
$ (734)
-
(320)
Total
$ 17,763
3,292
(320)
0.4
2.7
1
46
-
152
-
-
(14.8)
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1,418)
(938)
-
-
-
-
199
(1,418)
(938)
554.3
(74.4)
0.3
2.1
-
-
(12.8)
-
554.6
(85.1)
$ 1,386 $ 4,031 $ 19,508
3,943
-
-
-
-
-
$ (5,293) $ (1,054)
-
(132)
-
-
$ 18,578
3,943
(132)
-
-
-
82
-
60
-
-
-
(1,474)
(1,180)
-
-
-
-
142
(1,474)
(1,180)
$ 1,386 $ 4,113 $ 22,271
4,388
-
-
-
-
-
$ (6,707) $ (1,186)
-
436
-
-
$ 19,877
4,388
436
0.2
0.8
1
97
-
15
-
-
(14.5)
-
-
-
-
-
-
(2,218)
(1,371)
-
-
-
-
113
(2,218)
(1,371)
Balance at December 31, 2013
554.8
(98.8) $ 1,387 $ 4,210 $ 25,288
$ (8,910)
$ (750)
$ 21,225
[a] AOCI = Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) (Note 9)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
53
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to the
“Corporation”, “Company”, “UPC”, “we”, “us”, and “our” mean Union Pacific Corporation and its
subsidiaries, including Union Pacific Railroad Company, which will be separately referred to herein as
“UPRR” or the “Railroad”.
1. Nature of Operations
Operations and Segmentation – We are a Class I railroad operating in the U.S. Our network includes
31,838 route miles, linking Pacific Coast and Gulf Coast ports with the Midwest and eastern U.S.
gateways and providing several corridors to key Mexican gateways. We own 26,009 miles and operate on
the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases. We serve the western two-thirds of the country and
maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the Atlantic
Coast, the Pacific Coast, the Southeast, the Southwest, Canada, and Mexico. Export and import traffic is
moved through Gulf Coast and Pacific Coast ports and across the Mexican and Canadian borders.
The Railroad, along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates, is our one reportable operating segment.
Although we provide and review revenue by commodity group, we analyze the net financial results of the
Railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network. The following table provides
freight revenue by commodity group:
Millions
Agricultural
Automotive
Chemicals
Coal
Industrial Products
Intermodal
Total freight revenues
Other revenues
Total operating revenues
2013
3,276 $
2,077
3,501
3,978
3,822
4,030
2012
3,280 $
1,807
3,238
3,912
3,494
3,955
20,684 $
19,686 $
1,279
1,240
2011
3,324
1,510
2,815
4,084
3,166
3,609
18,508
1,049
21,963 $
20,926 $
19,557
$
$
$
Although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the U.S., the ultimate points of
origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the U.S. Each of our
commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from Mexico. Included in the above table are
revenues from our Mexico business which amounted to $2.1 billion in 2013, $1.9 billion in 2012, and $1.8
billion in 2011.
Basis of Presentation – The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP) as codified in the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC).
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation – The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Union
Pacific Corporation and all of its subsidiaries. Investments in affiliated companies (20% to 50% owned)
are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. All intercompany transactions are eliminated.
We currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable
interest entity requirements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three
months or less.
Accounts Receivable – Accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful
accounts. The allowance is based upon historical losses, credit worthiness of customers, and current
economic conditions. Receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated
allowances are classified as other assets in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
54
Investments – Investments represent our investments in affiliated companies (20% to 50% owned) that
are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies (less than 20%
owned) accounted for under the cost method of accounting.
Materials and Supplies – Materials and supplies are carried at the lower of average cost or market.
Property and Depreciation – Properties and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated on a
straight-line basis over their estimated service lives, which are measured in years, except for rail in high-
density traffic corridors (i.e., all rail lines except for those subject to abandonment, yard and switching
tracks, and electronic yards), for which lives are measured in millions of gross tons per mile of track. We
use the group method of depreciation in which all items with similar characteristics, use, and expected
lives are grouped together in asset classes, and are depreciated using composite depreciation rates. The
group method of depreciation treats each asset class as a pool of resources, not as singular items. We
determine the estimated service lives of depreciable railroad assets by means of depreciation studies.
Under the group method of depreciation, no gain or loss is recognized when depreciable property is
retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets – We review long-lived assets, including identifiable intangibles, for
impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. If impairment indicators are present and the estimated future undiscounted cash flows
are less than the carrying value of the long-lived assets, the carrying value is reduced to the estimated
fair value as measured by the discounted cash flows.
Revenue Recognition – We recognize freight revenues as freight moves from origin to destination. The
allocation of revenue between reporting periods is based on the relative transit time in each reporting
period with expenses recognized as incurred. Other revenues, which include revenues earned by our
subsidiaries, revenues from our commuter rail operations, and accessorial revenue, are recognized as
service is performed or contractual obligations are met. Customer incentives, which are primarily provided
for shipping a specified cumulative volume or shipping to/from specific locations, are recorded as a
reduction to operating revenues based on actual or projected future customer shipments.
Translation of Foreign Currency – Our portion of the assets and liabilities related to foreign investments
are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenue and
expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Unrealized gains or
losses are reflected within common shareholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income or
loss.
Fair Value Measurements – We use a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation
techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The level in the fair value hierarchy within
which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels include:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
We have applied fair value measurements to our pension plan assets and short- and long-term debt.
Stock-Based Compensation – We have several stock-based compensation plans under which
employees and non-employee directors receive stock options, nonvested retention shares, and
nonvested stock units. We refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as “retention
awards”. We have elected to issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings,
while new shares are issued when retention shares are granted.
We measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and
directors, including stock options. Compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the
awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed ratably over the service period of the awards
(generally the vesting period). The fair value of retention awards is the closing stock price on the date of
grant, while the fair value of stock options is determined by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
55
Earnings Per Share – Basic earnings per share are calculated on the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share include shares issuable upon
exercise of outstanding stock options and stock-based awards where the conversion of such instruments
would be dilutive.
Income Taxes – We account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current
year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have
been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. These expected future tax consequences are
measured based on current tax law; the effects of future tax legislation are not anticipated. Future tax
legislation, such as a change in the corporate tax rate, could have a material impact on our financial
condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
When appropriate, we record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets to reflect that these tax
assets may not be realized. In determining whether a valuation allowance is appropriate, we consider
whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized,
based on management’s judgments using available evidence for purposes of estimating whether future
taxable income will be sufficient to realize a deferred tax asset.
We recognize tax benefits that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax
authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50
percent likely to be realized upon settlement. A liability for “unrecognized tax benefits” is recorded for any
tax benefits claimed in our tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits – We incur certain employment-related expenses associated with
pensions and postretirement health benefits. In order to measure the expense associated with these
benefits, we must make various assumptions including discount rates used to value certain liabilities,
expected return on plan assets used to fund these expenses, compensation increases, employee
turnover rates, anticipated mortality rates, and expected future health care costs. The assumptions used
by us are based on our historical experience as well as current facts and circumstances. We use an
actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability associated with these benefits.
Personal Injury – The cost of injuries to employees and others on our property is charged to expense
based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year. We use an actuarial analysis
to measure the expense and liability. Our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value. Legal
fees and incidental costs are expensed as incurred.
Asbestos – We estimate a liability for asserted and unasserted asbestos-related claims based on an
assessment of the number and value of those claims. We use a statistical analysis to assist us in properly
measuring our potential liability. Our liability for asbestos-related claims is not discounted to present value
due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments. Legal fees and incidental costs are
expensed as incurred.
Environmental – When environmental issues have been identified with respect to property currently or
formerly owned, leased, or otherwise used in the conduct of our business, we perform, with the
assistance of our consultants, environmental assessments on such property. We expense the cost of the
assessments as incurred. We accrue the cost of remediation where our obligation is probable and such
costs can be reasonably estimated. We do not discount our environmental liabilities when the timing of
the anticipated cash payments is not fixed or readily determinable. Legal fees and incidental costs are
expensed as incurred.
Use of Estimates – Our Consolidated Financial Statements include estimates and assumptions
regarding certain assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses and the disclosure of certain contingent
assets and liabilities. Actual future results may differ from such estimates.
3. Accounting Pronouncements
On February 5, 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts
Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (ASU 2013-02), which adds additional
disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. We
adopted this ASU during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
56
4. Stock Options and Other Stock Plans
There are 7,140 restricted shares outstanding under the 1992 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors of Union Pacific Corporation. We no longer grant awards of restricted shares under this plan.
In April 2000, the shareholders approved the Union Pacific Corporation 2000 Directors Plan (Directors
Plan) whereby 1,100,000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance to our non-employee
directors. Under the Directors Plan, each non-employee director, upon his or her initial election to the
Board of Directors, receives a grant of 2,000 retention shares or retention stock units. Prior to December
31, 2007, each non-employee director received annually an option to purchase at fair value a number of
shares of our common stock, not to exceed 10,000 shares during any calendar year, determined by
dividing 60,000 by 1/3 of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of such
Board of Directors meeting, with the resulting quotient rounded up or down to the nearest 50 shares. In
September 2007, the Board of Directors eliminated the annual payment of options for 2008 and all future
years. As of December 31, 2013, 18,000 restricted shares and 81,100 options were outstanding under
the Directors Plan.
The Union Pacific Corporation 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (2001 Plan) was approved by the shareholders
in April 2001. The 2001 Plan reserved 24,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance to eligible
employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries in the form of non-qualified options, incentive stock
options, retention shares, stock units, and incentive bonus awards. Non-employee directors were not
eligible for awards under the 2001 Plan. As of December 31, 2013, 6,804 options were outstanding under
the 2001 Plan. We no longer grant any stock options or other stock or unit awards under this plan.
The Union Pacific Corporation 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (2004 Plan) was approved by shareholders in
April 2004. The 2004 Plan reserved 42,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance, plus any
shares subject to awards made under previous plans that were outstanding on April 16, 2004, and
became available for regrant pursuant to the terms of the 2004 Plan. Under the 2004 Plan, non-qualified
options, stock appreciation rights, retention shares, stock units, and incentive bonus awards may be
granted to eligible employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Non-employee directors are not
eligible for awards under the 2004 Plan. As of December 31, 2013, 3,633,693 options and 2,799,030
retention shares and stock units were outstanding under the 2004 Plan. We no longer grant any stock
options or other stock or unit awards under this plan.
The Union Pacific Corporation 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (2013 Plan) was approved by shareholders in
May 2013. The 2013 Plan reserved 39,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance, plus any
shares subject to awards made under previous plans as of February 28, 2013, that are subsequently
cancelled, expired, forfeited or otherwise not issued under previous plans. Under the 2013 Plan, non-
qualified options, incentive stock options, retention shares, stock units, and incentive bonus awards may
be granted to eligible employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Non-employee directors are not
eligible for awards under the 2013 Plan. As of December 31, 2013, only 1,064 retention shares and stock
units were outstanding under the 2013 Plan.
Pursuant to the above plans 39,787,448; 32,168,520; and 32,374,343 shares of our common stock were
authorized and available for grant at December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation – We have several stock-based compensation plans under which
employees and non-employee directors receive stock options, nonvested retention shares, and
nonvested stock units. We refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as “retention
awards”. We have elected to issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings,
while new shares are issued when retention shares are granted. Information regarding stock-based
compensation appears in the table below:
Millions
Stock-based compensation, before tax:
Stock options
Retention awards
Total stock-based compensation, before tax
2013
2012
2011
$ 19
79
$ 98
$
$
18
75
93
$ 18
64
$ 82
Excess tax benefits from equity compensation plans
$ 76
$ 100
$ 83
57
Stock Options – We estimate the fair value of our stock option awards using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. The table below shows the annual weighted-average assumptions used for valuation
purposes:
Weighted-Average Assumptions
Risk-free interest rate
Dividend yield
Expected life (years)
Volatility
2013
0.8%
2.1%
5.0
36.2%
2012
0.8%
2.1%
5.3
36.8%
2011
2.3%
1.6%
5.3
35.9%
Weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted
$
34.98
$
31.29
$
28.45
The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant; the dividend
yield is calculated as the ratio of dividends paid per share of common stock to the stock price on the date
of grant; the expected life is based on historical and expected exercise behavior; and volatility is based on
the historical volatility of our stock price over the expected life of the option.
A summary of stock option activity during 2013 is presented below:
Outstanding at January 1, 2013
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
Vested or expected to vest
at December 31, 2013
Shares
(thous.)
4,289
572
(1,117)
(22)
3,722
3,722
Options exercisable at December 31, 2013
2,575
$
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
65.68
132.00
50.64
107.99
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
5.8 yrs.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(millions)
258
$
N/A
N/A
N/A
$
$
$
80.14
80.12
62.46
5.8 yrs.
5.8 yrs.
4.7 yrs.
$
$
$
327
325
272
Stock options are granted at the closing price on the date of grant, have ten-year contractual terms, and
vest no later than three years from the date of grant. None of the stock options outstanding at December
31, 2013 are subject to performance or market-based vesting conditions.
At December 31, 2013, there was $17 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to
nonvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1 year.
Additional information regarding stock option exercises appears in the table below:
Millions
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised
Cash received from option exercises
Treasury shares repurchased for employee payroll taxes
Tax benefit realized from option exercises
Aggregate grant-date fair value of stock options vested
$
2013
112
51
(21)
43
16
$
2012
244
84
(30)
93
16
$
2011
209
137
(53)
80
19
58
Retention Awards – The fair value of retention awards is based on the closing price of the stock on the
grant date. Dividends and dividend equivalents are paid to participants during the vesting periods.
Changes in our retention awards during 2013 were as follows:
Nonvested at January 1, 2013
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested at December 31, 2013
Shares
(thous.)
2,355
421
(858)
(62)
1,856
Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Fair Value
73.27
$
132.04
47.70
84.81
$
98.04
Retention awards are granted at no cost to the employee or non-employee director and vest over periods
lasting up to four years. At December 31, 2013, there was $71 million of total unrecognized compensation
expense related to nonvested retention awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-
average period of 1.5 years.
Performance Retention Awards – In February 2013, our Board of Directors approved performance
stock unit grants. Other than different performance targets, the basic terms of these performance stock
units are identical to those granted in February 2011 and February 2012, including using annual return on
invested capital (ROIC) as the performance measure. We define ROIC as net operating profit adjusted
for interest expense (including interest on the present value of operating leases) and taxes on interest
divided by average invested capital adjusted for the present value of operating leases.
Stock units awarded to selected employees under these grants are subject to continued employment for
37 months and the attainment of certain levels of ROIC. We expense the fair value of the units that are
probable of being earned based on our forecasted ROIC over the 3-year performance period. We
measure the fair value of these performance stock units based upon the closing price of the underlying
common stock as of the date of grant, reduced by the present value of estimated future dividends.
Dividend equivalents are paid to participants only after the units are earned.
The assumptions used to calculate the present value of estimated future dividends related to the
February 2013 grant were as follows:
Dividend per share per quarter
Risk-free interest rate at date of grant
Changes in our performance retention awards during 2013 were as follows:
$
2013
0.69
0.4%
Nonvested at January 1, 2013
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested at December 31, 2013
Shares
(thous.)
1,075
304
(401)
(34)
944
Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Fair Value
83.80
$
125.14
58.33
98.69
$ 107.40
At December 31, 2013, there was $39 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to
nonvested performance retention awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 1.1 years. This expense is subject to achievement of the ROIC levels established for the
performance stock unit grants.
59
5. Retirement Plans
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Pension Plans – We provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through
qualified and non-qualified (supplemental) pension plans. Qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are
based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment, with
specific reductions made for early retirements.
Other Postretirement Benefits (OPEB) – We provide medical and life insurance benefits for eligible
retirees. These benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are paid.
Funded Status
We are required by GAAP to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension
and OPEB plans as an asset or liability. The funded status represents the difference between the
projected benefit obligation (PBO) and the fair value of the plan assets. Our non-qualified (supplemental)
pension plan is unfunded by design. The PBO of the pension plans is the present value of benefits
earned to date by plan participants, including the effect of assumed future compensation increases. The
PBO of the OPEB plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation, as the present value of the OPEB
liabilities is not affected by compensation increases. Plan assets are measured at fair value. We use a
December 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans.
Changes in our PBO and plan assets were as follows for the years ended December 31:
Funded Status
Millions
Projected Benefit Obligation
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Actuarial loss/(gain)
Gross benefits paid
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
Plan Assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Actual return on plan assets
Voluntary funded pension plan contributions
Non-qualified plan benefit contributions
Gross benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Funded status at end of year
Pension
OPEB
2013
2012
2013
2012
$
$
$
$
$
3,591
72
134
(257)
(168)
3,372
2,875
506
200
16
(168)
3,429
57
$
$
$
$
$
3,165
54
141
391
(160)
3,591
2,505
315
200
15
(160)
2,875
(716)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
372
3
12
(34)
(23)
330
-
-
-
23
(23)
336
3
15
42
(24)
372
-
-
-
24
(24)
-
$ -
(330)
$
(372)
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 consist of:
Millions
Noncurrent assets
Current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities
Net amounts recognized at end of year
Pension
2013
364
(16)
(291)
$
2012
1
(16)
(701)
OPEB
$
2013
-
(25)
(305)
$
2012
-
(27)
(345)
57
$
(716)
$
(330)
$
(372)
$
$
60
Pre-tax amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) as of December 31,
2013 and 2012 consist of:
Millions
Prior service (cost)/credit
Net actuarial loss
Total
Pension
-
$
(1,018)
$ (1,018)
$
$
2013
OPEB
28
(125)
Total
$
28
(1,143)
$
Pension
-
(1,685)
2012
OPEB
45
(175)
$
$
Total
45
(1,860)
(97)
$ (1,115)
$ (1,685)
$ (130)
$ (1,815)
Pre-tax changes recognized in other comprehensive income/(loss) during 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as
follows:
Millions
Prior service cost/(credit)
Net actuarial loss/(gain)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost/(credit)
Actuarial loss
Pension
$
2013
-
(561)
$
2012
-
265
$
2011
-
515
$
2013
-
(34)
OPEB
2012
-
42
$
$
2011
10
14
Total
$ (667)
$
181
$
442
$
(33)
$
47
$
-
(106)
(1)
(83)
(2)
(71)
16
(15)
18
(13)
34
(11)
47
Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) expected to be amortized into net
periodic cost (benefit) during 2014:
Millions
Prior service benefit
Net actuarial loss
Total
Pension
-
$
69
$
69
OPEB
$ (11)
10
$
(1)
Total
$ (11)
79
$
68
Underfunded Accumulated Benefit Obligation – The accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) is the present
value of benefits earned to date, assuming no future compensation growth. The underfunded
accumulated benefit obligation represents the difference between the ABO and the fair value of plan
assets. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the non-qualified (supplemental) plan ABO was $302 million
and $331 million, respectively. The following table discloses only the PBO, ABO, and fair value of plan
assets for pension plans where the accumulated benefit obligation is in excess of the fair value of the plan
assets as of December 31:
Underfunded Accumulated Benefit Obligation
Millions
Projected benefit obligation
Accumulated benefit obligation
Fair value of plan assets
Underfunded accumulated benefit obligation
2013
308
302
-
(302)
$
$
$
2012
3,574
3,440
2,857
(583)
$
$
$
The ABO for all defined benefit pension plans was $3.2 billion and $3.4 billion at December 31, 2013 and
2012, respectively.
61
Assumptions – The weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at
December 31:
Percentages
Discount rate
Compensation increase
Health care cost trend rate (employees under 65)
Ultimate health care cost trend rate
Year ultimate trend rate reached
Expense
Pension
OPEB
2013
4.72%
4.00%
N/A
N/A
N/A
2012
3.78%
3.76%
N/A
N/A
N/A
2013
4.47%
N/A
6.49%
4.50%
2028
2012
3.48%
N/A
6.64%
4.50%
2028
Both pension and OPEB expense are determined based upon the annual service cost of benefits (the
actuarial cost of benefits earned during a period) and the interest cost on those liabilities, less the
expected return on plan assets. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is applied to a
calculated value of plan assets that recognizes changes in fair value over a five-year period. This practice
is intended to reduce year-to-year volatility in pension expense, but it can have the effect of delaying the
recognition of differences between actual returns on assets and expected returns based on long-term rate
of return assumptions. Differences in actual experience in relation to assumptions are not recognized in
net income immediately, but are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income and, if necessary,
amortized as pension or OPEB expense.
The components of our net periodic pension and OPEB cost/(benefit) were as follows for the years ended
December 31:
Millions
Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of:
Prior service cost/(credit)
Actuarial loss
Pension
2013
2012
2011
2013
OPEB
2012
$
$
72
134
(202)
$
54
141
(190)
40
145
(180)
$
$
3
12
-
$
3
15
-
-
106
1
83
2
71
(16)
15
(18)
13
Net periodic benefit cost/(benefit)
$
110
$
89
$
78
$
14
$
13
$
2011
2
15
-
(34)
11
(6)
Assumptions – The weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine expense were as follows
for the years ended December 31:
Percentages
Discount rate
Expected return on plan assets
Compensation increase
Health care cost trend rate (employees under 65)
Ultimate health care cost trend rate
Year ultimate trend reached
OPEB
Pension
2012
2012
2013
2011
2013
2011
3.78% 4.54% 5.35% 3.48% 4.36% 5.01%
N/A
7.50% 7.50% 7.50%
3.43% 3.69% 4.48%
N/A
6.64% 6.91% 7.07%
N/A
N/A
4.50% 4.50% 4.50%
N/A
N/A
2028
2028
2028
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
The discount rate was based on a yield curve of high quality corporate bonds with cash flows matching
our plans’ expected benefit payments. The expected return on plan assets is based on our asset
allocation mix and our historical return, taking into account current and expected market conditions. The
actual return on pension plan assets, net of fees, was approximately 17% in 2013, 13% in 2012, and 2%
in 2011.
Assumed health care cost trend rates have an effect on the expense and liabilities reported for health
care plans. The assumed health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market
conditions. The 2014 assumed health care cost trend rate for employees under 65 is 6.64%. It is
62
assumed the rate will decrease gradually to an ultimate rate of 4.5% in 2028 and will remain at that level.
A one-percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following
effects on OPEB:
Millions
Effect on total service and interest cost components
Effect on accumulated benefit obligation
Cash Contributions
One % pt.
Increase
1
$
15
One % pt.
Decrease
(1)
(13)
$
The following table details our cash contributions for the qualified pension plans and the benefit payments
for the non-qualified (supplemental) pension and OPEB plans:
Millions
2012
2013
Pension
$
Qualified
200
200
Non-qualified
15
16
OPEB
24
23
Our policy with respect to funding the qualified plans is to fund at least the minimum required by law and
not more than the maximum amount deductible for tax purposes. All contributions made to the qualified
pension plans in 2013 were voluntary and were made with cash generated from operations.
The non-qualified pension and OPEB plans are not funded and are not subject to any minimum regulatory
funding requirements. Benefit payments for each year represent supplemental pension payments and
claims paid for medical and life insurance. We anticipate our 2014 supplemental pension and OPEB
payments will be made from cash generated from operations.
Benefit Payments
The following table details expected benefit payments for the years 2014 through 2023:
Millions
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Years 2019 - 2023
Asset Allocation Strategy
Pension
$ 171
176
181
185
191
1,019
$
OPEB
25
25
25
25
25
114
Our pension plan asset allocation at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and target allocation for 2014, are
as follows:
Equity securities
Debt securities
Real estate
Commodities
Total
Target
Allocation
2014
60% to 70%
20% to 30%
2% to 8%
4% to 6%
Percentage of Plan Assets
December 31,
2012
65%
25
5
5
2013
70%
21
4
5
100%
100%
The investment strategy for pension plan assets is to maintain a broadly diversified portfolio designed to
achieve our target average long-term rate of return of 7.5%. While we believe we can achieve a long-term
average rate of return of 7.5%, we cannot be certain that the portfolio will perform to our expectations.
Assets are strategically allocated among equity, debt, and other investments in order to achieve a
63
diversification level that reduces fluctuations in investment returns. Asset allocation target ranges for
equity, debt, and other portfolios are evaluated at least every three years with the assistance of an
independent consulting firm. Actual asset allocations are monitored monthly, and rebalancing actions are
executed at least quarterly, if needed.
The pension plan investments are held in a Master Trust. The majority of pension plan assets are
invested in equity securities because equity portfolios have historically provided higher returns than debt
and other asset classes over extended time horizons and are expected to do so in the future.
Correspondingly, equity investments also entail greater risks than other investments. Equity risks are
balanced by investing a significant portion of the plans’ assets in high quality debt securities. The average
credit rating of the debt portfolio exceeded A+ as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. The debt portfolio is
also broadly diversified and invested primarily in U.S. Treasury, mortgage, and corporate securities. The
weighted-average maturity of the debt portfolio was 12 years at both December 31, 2013 and 2012.
The investment of pension plan assets in securities issued by UPC is explicitly prohibited by the plan for
both the equity and debt portfolios, other than through index fund holdings.
Fair Value Measurements
The pension plan assets are valued at fair value. The following is a description of the valuation
methodologies used for the investments measured at fair value, including the general classification of
such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Temporary Cash Investments – These investments consist of U.S. dollars and foreign currencies held
in master trust accounts at The Northern Trust Company. Foreign currencies held are reported in terms
of U.S. dollars based on currency exchange rates readily available in active markets. These temporary
cash investments are classified as Level 1 investments.
Registered Investment Companies – Registered Investment Companies are real estate investments,
non-U.S. stock investments, and bond investments registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The real estate investments and non-U.S. stock investments are traded actively on public
exchanges. The share prices for these investments are published at the close of each business day.
Holdings of real estate investments and non-U.S. stock investments are classified as Level 1
investments. The bond investments are not traded publicly, but the underlying assets (stocks and bonds)
held in these funds are traded on active markets and the prices for these assets are readily observable.
Holdings in bond investments are classified as Level 2 investments.
U.S. Government Securities – Federal Government Securities consist of bills, notes, bonds, and other
fixed income securities issued directly by the U.S. Treasury or by government-sponsored enterprises.
These assets are valued using a bid evaluation process with bid data provided by independent pricing
sources. Federal Government Securities are classified as Level 2 investments.
Corporate Bonds & Debentures – Bonds and debentures consist of fixed income securities issued by
U.S. and non-U.S. corporations as well as state and local governments. These assets are valued using a
bid evaluation process with bid data provided by independent pricing sources. Corporate, state, and
municipal bonds and debentures are classified as Level 2 investments.
Corporate Stock – This investment category consists of common and preferred stock issued by U.S. and
non-U.S. corporations. Most common shares are traded actively on exchanges and price quotes for
these shares are readily available. Common stock is classified as a Level 1 investment. Preferred shares
included in this category are valued using a bid evaluation process with bid data provided by independent
pricing sources. Preferred stock is classified as a Level 2 investment.
Venture Capital and Buyout Partnerships – This investment category is comprised of interests in
limited partnerships that invest primarily in privately-held companies. Due to the private nature of the
partnership investments, pricing inputs are not readily observable. Asset valuations are developed by the
general partners that manage the partnerships. These valuations are based on the application of public
market multiples to private company cash flows, market transactions that provide valuation information for
comparable companies, and other methods. Holdings of limited partnership interests are classified as
Level 3 investments.
64
Real Estate Partnerships – Most of the real estate investments are partnership interests similar to those
described in the Venture Capital and Buyout Partnerships category. This category also includes real
estate investments held in less commonly used structures such as private real estate investment trusts
and pooled separate accounts. Valuations for the holdings in this category are not based on readily
observable inputs and are primarily derived from property appraisals. Interests in private real estate
partnerships, investment trusts and pooled separate accounts are classified as Level 3 investments.
Common Trust and Other Funds – Common trust funds are comprised of shares or units in commingled
funds that are not publicly traded. The underlying assets in these funds (U.S. stock funds, non-U.S. stock
funds, commodity funds, and short term investment funds) are publicly traded on exchanges and price
quotes for the assets held by these funds are readily available. Holdings of common trust funds are
classified as Level 2 investments.
This category also includes investments in limited liability companies that invest in publicly-traded
convertible securities, commodities, and other assets. The limited liability company investments are funds
that invest in both long and short positions in convertible securities, stocks, commodities, and fixed
income securities. The underlying securities held by the funds are traded actively on exchanges and
price quotes for these investments are readily available. Interests in the limited liability companies are
classified as a Level 2 investments.
Other Investments – This category includes several miscellaneous assets such as commodity hedge
fund investments and derivative securities. These investments have valuations that are based on
observable inputs and are classified as Level 2 investments.
As of December 31, 2013, the pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as
follows:
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Inputs
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
-
-
-
-
-
213
139
-
-
352
$
Total
16
264
126
310
999
213
139
1,357
-
3,424
5
$
3,429
Millions
Plan assets:
Temporary cash investments
Registered investment companies
U.S. government securities
Corporate bonds & debentures
Corporate stock
Venture capital and buyout partnerships
Real estate partnerships
Common trust and other funds
Other investments
$
$
16
11
-
-
983
-
-
-
-
$
-
253
126
310
16
-
-
1,357
-
Total plan assets at fair value
$ 1,010
$
2,062
$
Other assets [a]
Total plan assets
[a] Other assets include accrued receivables and pending broker settlements.
65
As of December 31, 2012, the pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as
follows:
Millions
Plan assets:
Temporary cash investments
Registered investment companies
U.S. government securities
Corporate bonds & debentures
Corporate stock
Venture capital and buyout partnerships
Real estate partnerships
Common trust and other funds
Other investments
Total plan assets at fair value
Other assets [a]
Total plan assets
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Inputs
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
$
$
14
10
-
-
758
-
-
-
-
782
$
$
-
258
125
326
12
-
-
1,018
27
$
1,766
$
-
-
-
-
-
179
143
-
-
322
$
Total
14
268
125
326
770
179
143
1,018
27
2,870
5
$
2,875
[a] Other assets include accrued receivables and pending broker settlements.
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no significant transfers in or out of Levels
1, 2, or 3.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 investments) during 2013:
Millions
Beginning balance - January 1, 2013
Realized gain
Unrealized gain
Purchases
Sales
$
Venture Capital
and Buyout
Partnerships
179
7
24
43
(40)
$
Real Estate
Partnerships
143
8
3
23
(38)
$
Ending balance - December 31, 2013
$
213
$
139
$
Total
322
15
27
66
(78)
352
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 investments) during 2012:
Millions
Beginning balance - January 1, 2012
Realized gain/(loss)
Unrealized gain
Purchases
Sales
$
Venture Capital
and Buyout
Partnerships
184
11
1
18
(35)
$
Real Estate
Partnerships
126
3
-
23
(9)
$
Ending balance - December 31, 2012
$
179
$
143
$
Total
310
14
1
41
(44)
322
66
Other Retirement Programs
401(k)/Thrift Plan – We provide a defined contribution plan (401(k)/thrift plan) to eligible non-union and
union employees for whom we make matching contributions. We match 50 cents for each dollar
contributed by employees up to the first six percent of compensation contributed. Our plan contributions
were $18 million in 2013, $15 million in 2012 and $14 million in 2011.
Railroad Retirement System – All Railroad employees are covered by the Railroad Retirement System
(the System). Contributions made to the System are expensed as incurred and amounted to
approximately $670 million in 2013, $644 million in 2012, and $600 million in 2011.
Collective Bargaining Agreements – Under collective bargaining agreements, we participate in multi-
employer benefit plans that provide certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for
eligible union employees. Premiums paid under these plans are expensed as incurred and amounted to
$57 million in 2013, $62 million in 2012, and $66 million in 2011.
6. Other Income
Other income included the following for the years ended December 31:
Millions
Rental income
Net gain on non-operating asset dispositions
Interest income
Early extinguishment of debt
Non-operating environmental costs and other
Total
2013 [a]
$ 106
32
4
(1)
(13)
$ 128
$
2012
83
29
3
(6)
(1)
$
2011
80
43
3
(5)
(9)
$ 108
$ 112
[a] Rental income includes $17 million related to a land lease contract settlement.
7. Income Taxes
Components of income tax expense were as follows for the years ended December 31:
Millions
Current tax expense:
Federal
State
Total current tax expense
Deferred tax expense:
Federal
State
Total deferred tax expense
Unrecognized tax benefits:
Federal
State
Total unrecognized tax benefits expense/(benefits)
2013
2012
2011
$ 1,738
199
$ 1,335
153
$
1,937
1,488
659
119
778
(54)
(1)
(55)
760
120
880
5
2
7
862
124
986
894
70
964
11
11
22
Total income tax expense
$ 2,660
$ 2,375
$ 1,972
67
For the years ended December 31, reconciliations between statutory and effective tax rates are as
follows:
Tax Rate Percentages
Federal statutory tax rate
State statutory rates, net of federal benefits
Deferred tax adjustments
Tax credits
Other
Effective tax rate
2013
35.0 %
3.1
(0.1)
(0.2)
(0.1)
37.7 %
2012
35.0 %
3.1
(0.1)
(0.5)
0.1
37.6 %
2011
35.0 %
3.1
(0.5)
(0.5)
0.4
37.5 %
In February of 2011, Arizona enacted legislation that will decrease the state’s corporate tax rate. This
reduced our deferred tax expense by $14 million in the first quarter of 2011.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the expected future tax consequences of events that
are reported in different periods for financial reporting and income tax purposes. The majority of our
deferred tax assets relate to deductions that already have been claimed for financial reporting purposes
but not for tax purposes. The majority of our deferred tax liabilities relate to differences between the tax
bases and financial reporting amounts of our land and depreciable property, due to accelerated tax
depreciation (including bonus depreciation), revaluation of assets in purchase accounting transactions,
and differences in capitalization methods.
Deferred income tax (liabilities)/assets were comprised of the following at December 31:
Millions
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property
Other
Total deferred income tax liabilities
Deferred income tax assets:
Accrued wages
Accrued casualty costs
Accrued stock compensation
Debt and leases
Retiree benefits
Credits
Other
Total deferred income tax assets
Net deferred income tax liability
Current portion of deferred taxes
Non-current portion of deferred taxes
Net deferred income tax liability
2013
2012
$ (14,448)
(260)
$ (13,863)
(237)
(14,708)
(14,100)
71
223
66
41
100
182
130
813
69
238
58
185
365
200
140
$
1,255
$
$ (13,895)
$ (12,845)
$
268
(14,163)
$
263
(13,108)
$ (13,895)
$ (12,845)
When appropriate, we record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets to reflect that these tax
assets may not be realized. In determining whether a valuation allowance is appropriate, we consider
whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized
based on management’s judgments using available evidence for purposes of estimating whether future
taxable income will be sufficient to realize a deferred tax asset. In 2013 and 2012, there were no valuation
allowances.
Tax benefits are recognized only for tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained upon
examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that
is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits are tax
benefits claimed in our tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards.
68
A reconciliation of changes in unrecognized tax benefits liabilities/(assets) from the beginning to the end
of the reporting period is as follows:
Millions
Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1
Increases for positions taken in current year
Increases for positions taken in prior years
Decreases for positions taken in prior years
Payments to and settlements with taxing authorities
Increases/(decreases) for interest and penalties
Lapse of statutes of limitations
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31
2013
$ 115
24
15
(30)
(63)
-
(2)
$
59
2012
$ 107
29
4
(19)
-
(4)
(2)
$ 115
$
2011
86
9
81
(30)
(27)
(9)
(3)
$ 107
We recognize interest and penalties as part of income tax expense. Total accrued liabilities for interest
and penalties were $6 million at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. Total interest and penalties
recognized as part of income tax expense (benefit) were $7 million for 2013, $(4) million for 2012, and
$10 million for 2011.
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examinations have been completed and settled for all years prior to 2005,
and the statute of limitations bars any additional tax assessments. The IRS has completed their
examinations and issued notices of deficiency for tax years 2005 through 2010. We disagree with many
of their proposed adjustments, and we are at IRS Appeals for those years. Additionally, several state tax
authorities are examining our state income tax returns for years 2006 through 2010.
In the fourth quarter of 2013, we reached an agreement in principle with the IRS to resolve all of the
issues related to tax years 2005 through 2008, except for calculations of interest. We anticipate signing a
closing agreement with the IRS within the next 12 months. Once formalized, this agreement should have
an immaterial effect on our income tax expense. Based on this agreement in principle, we made a
payment of $80 million, consisting of $68 million of tax and $12 million of interest.
In 2012, UPC and the IRS signed a closing agreement resolving all tax matters for tax years 1999-2004.
The settlement had an immaterial effect on our income tax expense. In connection with the settlement,
we received refunds of $8 million in 2013.
We do not expect our unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly in the next 12 months. At
December 31, 2013, we had a net unrecognized tax benefit liability of $59 million. Of that amount, $25
million is classified as a current liability in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
The portion of our unrecognized tax benefits that relates to permanent changes in tax and interest would
reduce our effective tax rate, if recognized. The remaining unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax
positions for which only the timing of the benefit is uncertain. Recognition of the tax benefits with
uncertain timing would reduce our effective tax rate only through a reduction of accrued interest and
penalties. The unrecognized tax benefits that would reduce our effective tax rate are as follows:
Millions
Unrecognized tax benefits that would reduce the effective tax rate
Unrecognized tax benefits that would not reduce the effective tax rate
Total unrecognized tax benefits
2013
34
25
$
2012
41
74
59
$ 115
$
$
$
2011
80
27
$ 107
69
8. Earnings Per Share
The following table provides a reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per share for the years
ended December 31:
Millions, Except Per Share Amounts
Net income
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding:
Basic
Dilutive effect of stock options
Dilutive effect of retention shares and units
Diluted
Earnings per share – basic
Earnings per share – diluted
2013
2012
2011
$
4,388
$
3,943
$
3,292
463.3
1.2
1.3
465.8
9.47
9.42
$
$
473.1
1.8
1.6
476.5
$
$
8.33
8.27
$
$
485.7
2.6
1.5
489.8
6.78
6.72
Common stock options totaling 0.2 million, 0.5 million, and 0.6 million for 2013, 2012, and 2011,
respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise
prices of these options exceeded the average market price of our common stock for the respective
periods, and the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
9. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) were as follows (net of tax):
Millions
Balance at January 1, 2013
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before
reclassifications
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income/(loss) [a]
Net year-to-date other comprehensive
income/(loss), net of taxes of ($264) million
Balance at December 31, 2013
Balance at January 1, 2012
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before
reclassifications
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income/(loss) [a]
Net year-to-date other comprehensive
income/(loss), net of taxes of $82 million
$
$
$
Defined
benefit
plans
(1,149)
Foreign
currency
translation
(36)
$
Derivatives
(1)
$
$
Total
(1,186)
(1)
437
436
(713)
(1,004)
(6)
(139)
(145)
$
$
(1)
-
(1)
(37)
(48)
12
-
12
1
-
1
(1)
437
436
$
$
-
$
(750)
(2)
$
(1,054)
1
-
1
7
(139)
(132)
Balance at December 31, 2012
$
(1,149)
$
(36)
$
(1)
$
(1,186)
[a]
The accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) reclassification components are 1) prior service
cost/(benefit) and 2) net actuarial loss which are both included in the computation of net periodic pension
cost. See Note 5 Retirement Plans for additional details.
10. Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable includes freight and other receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful
accounts. The allowance is based upon historical losses, credit worthiness of customers, and current
economic conditions. At December 31, 2013, and 2012, our accounts receivable were reduced by $1
million and $4 million, respectively. Receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the
associated allowances are classified as other assets in our Consolidated Statements of Financial
70
Position. At December 31, 2013, and 2012, receivables classified as other assets were reduced by
allowances of $22 million and $33 million, respectively.
Receivables Securitization Facility – The Railroad maintains a $600 million, 364-day receivables
securitization facility under which it sells most of its eligible third-party receivables to Union Pacific
Receivables, Inc. (UPRI), a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary that may subsequently transfer,
without recourse an undivided interest in accounts receivable to investors. The investors have no
recourse to the Railroad’s other assets except for customary warranty and indemnity claims. Creditors of
the Railroad do not have recourse to the assets of UPRI.
The amount outstanding under the facility was $0 and $100 million at December 31, 2013, and December
31, 2012, respectively. The facility was supported by $1.1 billion of accounts receivable as collateral at
both December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, which, as a retained interest, is included in accounts
receivable, net in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
The outstanding amount the Railroad is allowed to maintain under the facility, with a maximum of $600
million, may fluctuate based on the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by business
volumes and credit risks, including receivables payment quality measures such as default and dilution
ratios. If default or dilution ratios increase one percent, the allowable outstanding amount under the
facility would not materially change.
The costs of the receivables securitization facility include interest, which will vary based on prevailing
commercial paper rates, program fees paid to banks, commercial paper issuing costs, and fees for
unused commitment availability. The costs of the receivables securitization facility are included in interest
expense and were $5 million, $3 million and $4 million for 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
In July 2013, the $600 million receivables securitization facility was renewed for an additional 364-day
period at comparable terms and conditions.
11. Properties
The following tables list the major categories of property and equipment, as well as the weighted-average
estimated useful life for each category (in years):
Millions, Except Estimated Useful Life
As of December 31, 2013
Accumulated
Cost Depreciation
Net Book
Value
Estimated
Useful Life
Land
Road:
Rail and other track material
Ties
Ballast
Other roadway [a]
Total road
Equipment:
Locomotives
Freight cars
Work equipment and other
Total equipment
Technology and other
Construction in progress
Total
$ 5,120
$ N/A
$
5,120
13,861
8,785
4,621
15,596
42,863
7,518
2,085
561
10,164
711
954
4,970
2,310
1,171
2,726
11,177
3,481
1,000
119
4,600
286
-
8,891
6,475
3,450
12,870
31,686
4,037
1,085
442
5,564
425
954
$ 59,812
$ 16,063
$ 43,749
N/A
35
33
34
48
N/A
20
25
18
N/A
10
N/A
N/A
[a] Other roadway includes grading, bridges and tunnels, signals, buildings, and other road assets.
71
Millions, Except Estimated Useful Life
As of December 31, 2012
Accumulated
Cost Depreciation
Net Book
Value
Estimated
Useful Life
Land
$
5,105
$ N/A
$
5,105
Road:
Rail and other track material
Ties
Ballast
Other roadway [a]
Total road
Equipment:
Locomotives
Freight cars
Work equipment and other
Total equipment
Technology and other
Construction in progress
Total
13,220
8,404
4,399
14,806
40,829
7,297
1,991
535
9,823
633
889
4,756
2,157
1,085
2,583
10,581
3,321
1,018
89
4,428
273
-
8,464
6,247
3,314
12,223
30,248
3,976
973
446
5,395
360
889
$ 57,279
$ 15,282
$
41,997
N/A
33
33
34
49
N/A
19
23
17
N/A
11
N/A
N/A
[a] Other roadway includes grading, bridges and tunnels, signals, buildings, and other road assets.
Property and Depreciation – Our railroad operations are highly capital intensive, and our large base of
homogeneous, network-type assets turns over on a continuous basis. Each year we develop a capital
program for the replacement of assets and for the acquisition or construction of assets that enable us to
enhance our operations or provide new service offerings to customers. Assets purchased or constructed
throughout the year are capitalized if they meet applicable minimum units of property criteria. Properties
and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated
service lives, which are measured in years, except for rail in high-density traffic corridors (i.e., all rail lines
except for those subject to abandonment, yard and switching tracks, and electronic yards) for which lives
are measured in millions of gross tons per mile of track. We use the group method of depreciation in
which all items with similar characteristics, use, and expected lives are grouped together in asset classes,
and are depreciated using composite depreciation rates. The group method of depreciation treats each
asset class as a pool of resources, not as singular items. We currently have more than 60 depreciable
asset classes, and we may increase or decrease the number of asset classes due to changes in
technology, asset strategies, or other factors.
We determine the estimated service lives of depreciable railroad assets by means of depreciation studies.
We perform depreciation studies at least every three years for equipment and every six years for track
assets (i.e., rail and other track material, ties, and ballast) and other road property. Our depreciation
studies take into account the following factors:
Statistical analysis of historical patterns of use and retirements of each of our asset classes;
Evaluation of any expected changes in current operations and the outlook for continued use of
the assets;
Evaluation of technological advances and changes to maintenance practices; and
Expected salvage to be received upon retirement.
For rail in high-density traffic corridors, we measure estimated service lives in millions of gross tons per
mile of track. It has been our experience that the lives of rail in high-density traffic corridors are closely
correlated to usage (i.e., the amount of weight carried over the rail). The service lives also vary based on
rail weight, rail condition (e.g., new or secondhand), and rail type (e.g., straight or curve). Our
depreciation studies for rail in high density traffic corridors consider each of these factors in determining
the estimated service lives. For rail in high-density traffic corridors, we calculate depreciation rates
annually by dividing the number of gross ton-miles carried over the rail (i.e., the weight of loaded and
empty freight cars, locomotives and maintenance of way equipment transported over the rail) by the
estimated service lives of the rail measured in millions of gross tons per mile. For all other depreciable
assets, we compute depreciation based on the estimated service lives of our assets as determined from
72
the analysis of our depreciation studies. Changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their
related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively.
Under group depreciation, the historical cost (net of salvage) of depreciable property that is retired or
replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is
recognized. The historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using (i) inflation indices published by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics and (ii) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our
depreciation studies. The indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of
the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes. Because of the number of estimates
inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate
each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired, we continually monitor the
estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class
to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate. In addition, we determine if the recorded amount of
accumulated depreciation is deficient (or in excess) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies.
Any deficiency (or excess) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining
service lives of the applicable classes of assets.
For retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business, a
gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions: (i) is
unusual, (ii) is material in amount, and (iii) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through
our depreciation studies. A gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of
assets that are not part of our railroad operations.
When we purchase an asset, we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended
use. However, many of our assets are self-constructed. A large portion of our capital expenditures is for
replacement of existing track assets and other road properties, which is typically performed by our
employees, and for track line expansion and other capacity projects. Costs that are directly attributable to
capital projects (including overhead costs) are capitalized. Direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-
constructed assets include material, labor, and work equipment. Indirect costs are capitalized if they
clearly relate to the construction of the asset.
General and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred. Normal repairs and maintenance are
also expensed as incurred, while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset, improve the safety
of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized. These costs are allocated using
appropriate statistical bases. Total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $2.3 billion for
2013, $2.1 billion for 2012, and $2.2 billion for 2011.
Assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease
payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease. Amortization expense is
computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the
period of the related lease.
12. Accounts Payable and Other Current Liabilities
Millions
Accounts payable
Income and other taxes payable
Accrued wages and vacation
Dividends payable
Accrued casualty costs
Interest payable
Equipment rents payable
Other
$
Dec. 31,
2013
803
491
385
356
207
169
96
579
$
Dec. 31,
2012
825
368
376
318
213
172
95
556
Total accounts payable and other current liabilities
$
3,086
$ 2,923
73
13. Financial Instruments
Strategy and Risk – We may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than
trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel
prices. We are not a party to leveraged derivatives and, by policy, do not use derivative financial
instruments for speculative purposes. Derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting
must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being
hedged, both at inception and throughout the hedged period. We formally document the nature and
relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception, as well as our risk-
management objectives, strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions, and method of
assessing hedge effectiveness. Changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that
do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings. We may use swaps, collars, futures, and/or
forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices; however, the
use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel
price movements.
Market and Credit Risk – We address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting
instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item. We manage
credit risk related to derivative financial instruments, which is minimal, by requiring high credit standards
for counterparties and periodic settlements. At December 31, 2013, and 2012, we were not required to
provide collateral, nor had we received collateral, relating to our hedging activities.
Interest Rate Fair Value Hedges – We manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by
adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given
period. We generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted
amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings. We employ derivatives,
primarily swaps, as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix. In addition, we also obtain flexibility in
managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of
and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities.
Swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in
the debt’s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates. We account for swaps as fair value
hedges using the short-cut method; therefore, we do not record any ineffectiveness within our
Consolidated Financial Statements. As of December 31, 2013, and 2012, we had no interest rate fair
value hedges outstanding.
Interest Rate Cash Flow Hedges – We report changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges in
accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged item affects earnings. At both December 31,
2013, and 2012, we had reductions of $1 million recorded as an accumulated other comprehensive loss
that is being amortized on a straight-line basis through September 30, 2014. As of December 31, 2013,
and 2012, we had no interest rate cash flow hedges outstanding.
Earnings Impact – Our use of derivative financial instruments had no impact on pre-tax income for the
years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments – The fair value of our short- and long-term debt was estimated
using a market value price model, which utilizes applicable U.S. Treasury rates along with current market
quotes on comparable debt securities. All of the inputs used to determine the fair market value of the
Corporation’s long-term debt are Level 2 inputs and obtained from an independent source. At December
31, 2013, the fair value of total debt was $10.2 billion, approximately $0.6 billion more than the carrying
value. At December 31, 2012, the fair value of total debt was $11.1 billion, approximately $2.1 billion
more than the carrying value. The fair value of the Corporation’s debt is a measure of its current value
under present market conditions. It does not impact the financial statements under current accounting
rules. At December 31, 2013, and 2012, approximately $163 million and $203 million, respectively, of
debt securities contained call provisions that allow us to retire the debt instruments prior to final maturity,
with the payment of fixed call premiums, or in certain cases, at par. The fair value of our cash equivalents
approximates their carrying value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
74
14. Debt
Total debt as of December 31, 2013, and 2012, net of interest rate swaps designated as fair value
hedges, is summarized below:
Millions
Notes and debentures, 2.8% to 7.9% due through 2054
Capitalized leases, 3.1% to 8.4% due through 2028
Floating rate term loans, due through 2016
Equipment obligations, 6.2% to 6.7% due through 2031
Mortgage bonds, 4.8% due through 2030
Medium-term notes, 9.2% to 10.0% due through 2020
Tax-exempt financings, 1.9% to 5.1% due through 2015
Receivables Securitization (Note 10)
Unamortized discount
Total debt
Less: current portion
Total long-term debt
$
$
2013
8,068
1,702
200
110
57
32
12
-
(604)
9,577
(705)
2012
6,950
1,848
200
119
57
32
56
100
(365)
8,997
(196)
$
8,872
$
8,801
Debt Maturities – The following table presents aggregate debt maturities as of December 31, 2013,
excluding market value adjustments:
Millions
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Thereafter
Total debt
$
705
448
582
649
562
6,631
$ 9,577
As of December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, we have reclassified as long-term debt $0 and $100
million, respectively, of debt due within one year that we intend to refinance. This reclassification reflects
our ability and intent to refinance any short-term borrowings and certain current maturities of long-term
debt on a long-term basis.
Equipment Encumbrances – Equipment with a carrying value of approximately $2.9 billion at both
December 31, 2013, and 2012 served as collateral for capital leases and other types of equipment
obligations in accordance with the secured financing arrangements utilized to acquire such railroad
equipment.
As a result of the merger of Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (MPRR) with and into UPRR on January
1, 1997, and pursuant to the underlying indentures for the MPRR mortgage bonds, UPRR must maintain
the same value of assets after the merger in order to comply with the security requirements of the
mortgage bonds. As of the merger date, the value of the MPRR assets that secured the mortgage bonds
was approximately $6.0 billion. In accordance with the terms of the indentures, this collateral value must
be maintained during the entire term of the mortgage bonds irrespective of the outstanding balance of
such bonds.
Credit Facilities – On December 31, 2013, we had $1.8 billion of credit available under our revolving
credit facility (the facility), which is designated for general corporate purposes and supports the issuance
of commercial paper. We did not draw on the facility during 2013. Commitment fees and interest rates
payable under the facility are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated, investment-grade
borrowers. The facility allows for borrowings at floating rates based on London Interbank Offered Rates,
plus a spread, depending upon credit ratings for our senior unsecured debt. The facility matures in 2015
under a four year term and requires the Corporation to maintain a debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio as a
condition to making a borrowing. At December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012 (and at all times during
the year), we were in compliance with this covenant.
75
The definition of debt used for purposes of calculating the debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio includes,
among other things, certain credit arrangements, capital leases, guarantees and unfunded and vested
pension benefits under Title IV of ERISA. At December 31, 2013, the debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio
allowed us to carry up to $42.4 billion of debt (as defined in the facility), and we had $9.9 billion of debt
(as defined in the facility) outstanding at that date. Under our current capital plans, we expect to continue
to satisfy the debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio; however, many factors beyond our reasonable control
could affect our ability to comply with this provision in the future. The facility does not include any other
financial restrictions, credit rating triggers (other than rating-dependent pricing), or any other provision
that could require us to post collateral. The facility also includes a $75 million cross-default provision and
a change-of-control provision.
During 2013, we did not issue or repay any commercial paper, and at December 31, 2013, and 2012, we
had no commercial paper outstanding. Our revolving credit facility supports our outstanding commercial
paper balances, and, unless we change the terms of our commercial paper program, our aggregate
issuance of commercial paper will not exceed the amount of borrowings available under the facility.
Dividend Restrictions – Our revolving credit facility includes a debt-to-net worth covenant (discussed in
the Credit Facilities section above) that, under certain circumstances, restricts the payment of cash
dividends to our shareholders. The amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $16.3 billion
and $15.1 billion at December 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
Shelf Registration Statement and Significant New Borrowings – We filed an automatic shelf
registration statement that became effective on February 8, 2013. The Board of Directors authorized the
issuance of up to $4 billion of debt securities, replacing the $1.4 billion of authority remaining under our
shelf registration filed in February 2010. SEC rules require UPC, a large accelerated filer, to file a new
shelf registration statement every three years. Under the current shelf registration, we may issue, from
time to time, any combination of debt securities, preferred stock, common stock, or warrants for debt
securities or preferred stock in one or more offerings. We have no immediate plans to issue equity
securities; however, we will continue to explore opportunities to replace existing debt or access capital
through issuances of debt securities under our shelf registration, and, therefore, we may issue additional
debt securities at any time.
During 2013, we issued the following unsecured, fixed-rate debt securities under our current shelf
registration:
Date
March 15, 2013
October 25, 2013
Description of Securities
$325 million of 2.75% Notes due April 15, 2023
$325 million of 4.25% Notes due April 15, 2043
$500 million of 4.75% Notes due December 15, 2043
We used the net proceeds from the offerings for general corporate purposes, including the repurchase of
common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program. These debt securities include change-of-
control provisions. At December 31, 2013, we had remaining authority to issue up to $2.85 billion of debt
securities under our shelf registration.
In May 2012, we borrowed $100 million under a 4-year-term bank loan (the loan). The loan has a floating
rate based on London Interbank Offered Rates, plus a spread, and is prepayable in whole or in part
without a premium prior to maturity. The agreement documenting the loan has provisions similar to our
revolving credit facility, including identical debt-to-net-worth covenant and change of control provisions
and similar customary default provisions. The agreement does not include any other financial restrictions,
credit rating triggers, or any other provision that would require us to post collateral.
76
Subsequent Event – In 2014, we issued the following unsecured, fixed-rate debt securities under our
current shelf registration:
Date
January 10, 2014
Description of Securities
$300 million of 2.25% Notes due February 15, 2019
$400 million of 3.75% Notes due March 15, 2024
$300 million of 4.85% Notes due June 15, 2044
Proceeds from this offering are for general corporate purposes, including the repurchase of common
stock pursuant to our share repurchase program. These debt securities include change-of-control
provisions. As of February 7, 2014, we had remaining authority from our Board of Directors to issue up to
$1.85 billion of debt securities under our shelf registration.
Debt Exchange – On August 21, 2013, we exchanged $1,170 million of various outstanding notes and
debentures due between 2016 and 2040 (Existing Notes) for $439 million of 3.646% notes (New 2024
Notes) due February 15, 2024 and $700 million of 4.821% notes (New 2044 Notes) due February 1,
2044, plus cash consideration of approximately $280 million in addition to $8 million for accrued and
unpaid interest on the Existing Notes. In accordance with ASC 470-50-40, Debt-Modifications and
Extinguishments-Derecognition, this transaction was accounted for as a debt exchange, as the
exchanged debt instruments are not considered to be substantially different. The cash consideration was
recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of debt, and the balance of the unamortized discount and
issue costs from the Existing Notes is being amortized as an adjustment of interest expense over the
terms of the New 2024 Notes and the New 2044 Notes. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of the
exchange. Costs related to the debt exchange that were payable to parties other than the debt holders
totaled approximately $9 million and were included in interest expense during the three months ended
September 30, 2013.
The following table lists the outstanding notes and debentures that were exchanged:
Millions
The 2024 Offers
7.000% Debentures due 2016
5.650% Notes due 2017
5.750% Notes due 2017
5.700% Notes due 2018
7.875% Notes due 2019
6.125% Notes due 2020
The 2044 Offers
7.125% Debentures due 2028
6.625% Debentures due 2029
6.250% Debentures due 2034
6.150% Debentures due 2037
5.780% Notes due 2040
Total
Principal amount
exchanged
$
8
38
70
103
20
238
73
177
19
138
286
$
1,170
Debt Redemptions – On May 14, 2013, we redeemed all $40 million of our outstanding 5.65% Port of
Corpus Christi Authority Revenue Refunding Bonds due December 1, 2022. The redemption resulted in
an early extinguishment charge of $1 million in the second quarter of 2013.
On November 30, 2012, we redeemed all $450 million of our outstanding 5.45% notes due January 31,
2013. The redemption resulted in an early extinguishment charge of $4 million in the fourth quarter of
2012.
On April 28, 2012, we redeemed all $100 million of our outstanding 5.70% Tooele County, Utah
Hazardous Waste Treatment Revenue Bonds due November 1, 2026. The redemption resulted in an
early extinguishment charge of $2 million in the second quarter of 2012.
77
On December 19, 2011, we redeemed the remaining $175 million of our 6.5% notes due April 15, 2012,
and all $300 million of our outstanding 6.125% notes due January 15, 2012. The redemptions resulted in
an early extinguishment charge of $5 million in the fourth quarter of 2011.
Receivables Securitization Facility – As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we recorded $0 and $100
million, respectively, as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility. (See further discussion
of our receivables securitization facility in Note 10).
15. Variable Interest Entities
We have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable
interest entities (VIEs). These VIEs were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions
(principally involving railroad equipment and facilities, including our headquarters building) and have no
other activities, assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions. Within these lease arrangements,
we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices. Depending on market conditions,
fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us; however,
these benefits are not expected to be significant.
We maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements,
which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry. As such, we have no control over
activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets. We do not hold the power to
direct the activities of the VIEs and, therefore, do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant
impact on the economic performance of the VIEs. Additionally, we do not have the obligation to absorb
losses of the VIEs or the right to receive benefits of the VIEs that could potentially be significant to the
VIEs.
We are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these VIEs because our
actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the VIE’s performance and our fixed-price
purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the VIEs. The future minimum
lease payments associated with the VIE leases totaled $3.3 billion as of December 31, 2013.
16. Leases
We lease certain locomotives, freight cars, and other property. The Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 included $2,486 million, net of $1,092 million of accumulated
depreciation, and $2,467 million, net of $966 million of accumulated depreciation, respectively, for
properties held under capital leases. A charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held
under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable
lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2013, were as follows:
Millions
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Later years
Total minimum lease payments
Amount representing interest
Present value of minimum lease payments
$
Operating
Leases
512
477
438
400
332
1,907
$
Capital
Leases
272
260
239
247
225
957
$ 4,066
$ 2,200
N/A
N/A
(498)
$ 1,702
Approximately 94% of capital lease payments relate to locomotives. Rent expense for operating leases
with terms exceeding one month was $618 million in 2013, $631 million in 2012, and $637 million in 2011.
When cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis, we recognize variable rental expense
on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant.
78
17. Commitments and Contingencies
Asserted and Unasserted Claims – Various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of
our subsidiaries. We cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our
consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity; however, to the extent possible, where
asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably
estimated, we have recorded a liability. We do not expect that any known lawsuits, claims, environmental
costs, commitments, contingent liabilities, or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and
insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters.
Personal Injury – The cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is
charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year. We use
an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability, including unasserted claims. The Federal
Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) governs compensation for work-related accidents. Under FELA, damages
are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements. We offer a
comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work.
Our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the
timing of future payments. Approximately 92% of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and
approximately 8% is related to unasserted claims at December 31, 2013. Because of the uncertainty
surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims, it is reasonably possible that future costs to
settle these claims may range from approximately $294 million to $322 million. We record an accrual at
the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other.
Estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation.
Our personal injury liability activity was as follows:
Millions
Beginning balance
Current year accruals
Changes in estimates for prior years
Payments
Ending balance at December 31
Current portion, ending balance at December 31
2013
334
87
(38)
(89)
294
82
$
$
$
2012
368
121
(58)
(97)
334
95
$
$
$
2011
426
118
(71)
(105)
368
103
$
$
$
Asbestos – We are a defendant in a number of lawsuits in which current and former employees and
other parties allege exposure to asbestos. We assess our potential liability using a statistical analysis of
resolution costs for asbestos-related claims. This liability is updated annually and excludes future
defense and processing costs. The liability for resolving both asserted and unasserted claims was based
on the following assumptions:
The ratio of future claims by alleged disease would be consistent with historical averages
adjusted for inflation.
The number of claims filed against us will decline each year.
The average settlement values for asserted and unasserted claims will be equivalent to historical
averages.
The percentage of claims dismissed in the future will be equivalent to historical averages.
Our liability for asbestos-related claims is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty
surrounding the timing of future payments. Approximately 18% of the recorded liability related to asserted
claims and approximately 82% related to unasserted claims at December 31, 2013. Because of the
uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of asbestos-related claims, it is reasonably possible that
future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $131 million to $141 million. We record
an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any
other.
79
Our asbestos-related liability activity was as follows:
Millions
Beginning balance
Accruals/(Credits)
Payments
Ending balance at December 31
Current portion, ending balance at December 31
2013
139
2
(10)
131
9
$
$
$
2012
147
(2)
(6)
139
8
$
$
$
2011
162
(5)
(10)
147
8
$
$
$
In conjunction with the liability update performed in 2013, we also reassessed estimated insurance
recoveries. We have recognized an asset for estimated insurance recoveries at December 31, 2013, and
2012. The amounts recorded for asbestos-related liabilities and related insurance recoveries were based
on currently known facts. However, future events, such as the number of new claims filed each year,
average settlement costs, and insurance coverage issues, could cause the actual costs and insurance
recoveries to be higher or lower than the projected amounts. Estimates also may vary in the future if
strategies, activities, and outcomes of asbestos litigation materially change; federal and state laws
governing asbestos litigation increase or decrease the probability or amount of compensation of
claimants; and there are material changes with respect to payments made to claimants by other
defendants.
Environmental Costs – We are subject to federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations.
We have identified 268 sites at which we are or may be liable for remediation costs associated with
alleged contamination or for violations of environmental requirements. This includes 33 sites that are the
subject of actions taken by the U.S. government, 17 of which are currently on the Superfund National
Priorities List. Certain federal legislation imposes joint and several liability for the remediation of identified
sites; consequently, our ultimate environmental liability may include costs relating to activities of other
parties, in addition to costs relating to our own activities at each site.
When we identify an environmental issue with respect to property owned, leased, or otherwise used in
our business, we perform, with assistance of our consultants, environmental assessments on the
property. We expense the cost of the assessments as incurred. We accrue the cost of remediation where
our obligation is probable and such costs can be reasonably estimated. We do not discount our
environmental liabilities when the timing of the anticipated cash payments is not fixed or readily
determinable. At December 31, 2013, and 2012, none of our environmental liability was discounted, while
less than 1% of our environmental liability was discounted at 2.0% at December 31, 2011.
Our environmental liability activity was as follows:
Millions
Beginning balance
Accruals
Payments
Ending balance at December 31
Current portion, ending balance at December 31
[a] Payments include $25 million to resolve the Omaha Lead Site liability.
2013
170
58
(57)
171
53
$
$
$
2012
172
48
(50)
170
50
$
$
$
2011 [a]
213
$
29
(70)
$
$
172
50
The environmental liability includes future costs for remediation and restoration of sites, as well as
ongoing monitoring costs, but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties. Cost estimates are
based on information available for each site, financial viability of other potentially responsible parties, and
existing technology, laws, and regulations. The ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine
because of the number of potentially responsible parties, site-specific cost sharing arrangements with
other potentially responsible parties, the degree of contamination by various wastes, the scarcity and
quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites, and the speculative nature of remediation costs.
Estimates of liability may vary over time due to changes in federal, state, and local laws governing
environmental remediation. Current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.
80
Insurance – The Company has a consolidated, wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary (the captive),
that provides insurance coverage for certain risks including FELA claims and property coverage which are
subject to reinsurance. The captive entered into annual reinsurance treaty agreements that insure
workers compensation, general liability, auto liability and FELA risk. The captive cedes a portion of its
FELA exposure through the treaty and assumes a proportionate share of the entire risk. The captive
receives direct premiums, which are netted against the Company’s premium costs in other expenses in
the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The treaty agreements provide for certain
protections against the risk of treaty participants’ non-performance, and we do not believe our exposure
to treaty participants’ non-performance is material at this time. In the event the Company leaves the
reinsurance program, the Company is not relieved of its primary obligation to the policyholders for activity
prior to the termination of the treaty agreements. We record both liabilities and reinsurance receivables
using an actuarial analysis based on historical experience in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position.
Guarantees – At December 31, 2013, and 2012, we were contingently liable for $299 million and $307
million in guarantees. We have recorded a liability of $1 million and $2 million for the fair value of these
obligations as of December 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively. We entered into these contingent
guarantees in the normal course of business, and they include guaranteed obligations related to our
headquarters building, equipment financings, and affiliated operations. The final guarantee expires in
2022. We are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees.
We do not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
Indemnities – Our maximum potential exposure under indemnification arrangements, including certain
tax indemnifications, can range from a specified dollar amount to an unlimited amount, depending on the
nature of the transactions and the agreements. Due to uncertainty as to whether claims will be made or
how they will be resolved, we cannot reasonably determine the probability of an adverse claim or
reasonably estimate any adverse liability or the total maximum exposure under these indemnification
arrangements. We do not have any reason to believe that we will be required to make any material
payments under these indemnity provisions.
Gain Contingency – UPRR and Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines (SFPP, a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan
Energy Partners, L.P.) currently are engaged in a proceeding to resolve the fair market rent payable to
UPRR under a 10-year agreement commencing on January 1, 2004, for pipeline easements on UPRR
rights-of-way (Union Pacific Railroad Company vs. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc., SFPP, L.P., Kinder
Morgan Operating L.P. “D” Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., et al., Superior Court of the State of California for
the County of Los Angeles, filed July 28, 2004). In February 2007, a trial began to resolve this issue, and,
on September 28, 2011, the judge issued a tentative Statement of Decision, which concluded that SFPP
owes back rent to UPRR for the years 2004 through 2011. On May 29, 2012, the court entered judgment,
awarding UPRR back rent and prejudgment interest. SFPP is appealing the final judgment. A favorable
final judgment may materially affect our results of operations in the period of any monetary recoveries;
however, due to the uncertainty regarding the amount and timing of any recovery, including the outcome
of SFPP’s appeal of this judgment or any subsequent proceeding, we consider this a gain contingency
and do not reflect any amounts in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31,
2013.
81
18. Share Repurchase Program
Effective April 1, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 40 million shares of our
common stock by March 31, 2014, replacing our previous repurchase program. As of December 31,
2013, we repurchased a total of $9.3 billion of our common stock since the commencement of our
repurchase programs. The table below represents shares repurchased under this repurchase program.
First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
2012
3,917,369
3,770,528
3,098,812
2,033,750
2013
2,881,400
3,061,470
3,666,894
4,929,055
$
$
Average Price Paid
2012
110.64
110.02
122.13
121.81
2013
136.58
151.42
156.77
159.36
14,538,819
12,820,459
$
152.52
$
115.01
On November 21, 2013, our Board of Directors approved the early renewal of the share repurchase
program, authorizing the repurchase of up to 60 million shares of common stock by December 31, 2017.
The new authorization was effective January 1, 2014, and replaces the previous authorization, which
expired on December 31, 2013, three months earlier than its original expiration date.
Management's assessments of market conditions and other pertinent facts guide the timing and volume
of all repurchases. We expect to fund any share repurchases under this program through cash generated
from operations, the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties, debt issuances, and
cash on hand. Repurchased shares are recorded in treasury stock at cost, which includes any applicable
commissions and fees.
19. Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
Millions, Except Per Share Amounts
2013
Operating revenues
Operating income
Net income
Net income per share:
Basic
Diluted
Millions, Except Per Share Amounts
2012
Operating revenues
Operating income
Net income
Net income per share:
Basic
Diluted
Mar. 31
Jun. 30
Sep. 30
Dec. 31
$ 5,290
1,633
957
$ 5,470
1,878
1,106
$
5,573
1,962
1,151
$ 5,630
1,973
1,174
2.05
2.03
2.38
2.37
2.49
2.48
2.56
2.55
Mar. 31
Jun. 30
Sep. 30
Dec. 31
$ 5,112
1,510
863
$ 5,221
1,724
1,002
$
5,343
1,786
1,042
$ 5,250
1,725
1,036
1.81
1.79
2.11
2.10
2.21
2.19
2.21
2.19
Per share net income for the four quarters combined may not equal the per share net income for the year
due to rounding.
82
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Corporation carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s management, including the Corporation’s Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and Executive Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures
pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls
and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Based
upon that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this
report, the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Additionally, the CEO and CFO determined that there were no changes to the Corporation’s internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the last
fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s
internal control over financial reporting.
83
MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies (the Corporation) is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). The Corporation’s internal control system was designed
to provide reasonable assurance to the Corporation’s management and Board of Directors regarding the
preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even
those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial
statement preparation and presentation.
The Corporation’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control –
Integrated Framework (1992). Based on our assessment, management believes that, as of December 31,
2013, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
The Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on the
effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on the next
page.
February 6, 2014
84
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Union Pacific Corporation:
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary
Companies (the Corporation) as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control
— Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Corporation's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Corporation's internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision
of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar
functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of
collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may
not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of
the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated
Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2013 of the Corporation and our report dated February 7, 2014
expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.
Omaha, Nebraska
February 7, 2014
85
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
(a) Directors of Registrant.
PART III
Information as to the names, ages, positions and offices with UPC, terms of office, periods of
service, business experience during the past five years and certain other directorships held by each
director or person nominated to become a director of UPC is set forth in the Election of Directors
segment of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information concerning our Audit Committee and the independence of its members, along with
information about the audit committee financial expert(s) serving on the Audit Committee, is set forth
in the Audit Committee segment of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Executive Officers of Registrant.
Information concerning the executive officers of UPC and its subsidiaries is presented in Part I of
this report under Executive Officers of the Registrant and Principal Executive Officers of
Subsidiaries.
(c) Section 16(a) Compliance.
Information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is set
forth in the Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance segment of the Proxy
Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
(d) Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers of Registrant.
The Board of Directors of UPC has adopted the UPC Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer
and Senior Financial Officers (the Code). A copy of the Code may be found on the Internet at our
website www.up.com/investors/governance. We intend to disclose any amendments to the Code or
any waiver from a provision of the Code on our website.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information concerning compensation received by our directors and our named executive officers is
presented in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Summary Compensation Table, Grants of Plan-
Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2013, Outstanding Equity Awards at 2013 Fiscal Year-End, Option
Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2013, Pension Benefits at 2013 Fiscal Year-End, Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation at 2013 Fiscal Year-End, Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in
Control and Director Compensation in Fiscal Year 2013 segments of the Proxy Statement and is
incorporated herein by reference. Additional information regarding compensation of directors, including
Board committee members, is set forth in the By-Laws of UPC and the Stock Unit Grant and Deferred
Compensation Plan for the Board of Directors, both of which are included as exhibits to this report.
Information regarding the Compensation and Benefits Committee is set forth in the Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation and Compensation Committee Report segments of the
Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
86
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
Information as to the number of shares of our equity securities beneficially owned by each of our directors
and nominees for director, our named executive officers, our directors and executive officers as a group,
and certain beneficial owners is set forth in the Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management segment of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
The following table summarizes the equity compensation plans under which UPC common stock may be
issued as of December 31, 2013:
Column (a)
Column (b)
Column (c)
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
5,102,375
[1]
5,102,375
$
$
62.46
[2]
39,787,448
62.46
39,787,448
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders
Total
[1]
Includes 1,380,778 retention units that do not have an exercise price. Does not include 1,444,456 retention shares that have
been issued and are outstanding.
[2] Does not include the retention units or retention shares described above in footnote 1.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
Information on related transactions is set forth in the Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation segments of the Proxy Statement and is
incorporated herein by reference. We do not have any relationship with any outside third party that would
enable such a party to negotiate terms of a material transaction that may not be available to, or available
from, other parties on an arm’s-length basis.
Information regarding the independence of our directors is set forth in the Director Independence
segment of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information concerning the fees billed by our independent registered public accounting firm and the
nature of services comprising the fees for each of the two most recent fiscal years in each of the following
categories: (i) audit fees, (ii) audit-related fees, (iii) tax fees, and (iv) all other fees, is set forth in the
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fees and Services segment of the Proxy Statement
and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information concerning our Audit Committee’s policies and procedures pertaining to pre-approval of audit
and non-audit services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm is set forth in the
Audit Committee segment of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
87
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedules, and Exhibits:
(1) Financial Statements
The financial statements filed as part of this filing are listed on the index to the Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8, on page 48.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or not required
or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Item 8, or notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits
Exhibits are listed in the exhibit index beginning on page 91. The exhibits include management
contracts, compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as exhibits to the Form
10-K by Item 601 (10) (iii) of Regulation S-K.
88
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on
this 7th day of February, 2014.
UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION
By /s/ John J. Koraleski
John J. Koraleski,
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Union Pacific Corporation
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below,
on this 7th day of February, 2014, by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities
indicated.
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND DIRECTOR:
/s/ John J. Koraleski
John J. Koraleski,
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Union Pacific Corporation
/s/ Robert M. Knight, Jr.
Robert M. Knight, Jr.,
Executive Vice President - Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
/s/ Jeffrey P. Totusek
Jeffrey P. Totusek,
Vice President and Controller
Michael R. McCarthy*
Michael W. McConnell*
Thomas F. McLarty III*
Steven R. Rogel*
Jose H. Villarreal*
James R. Young*
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER:
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER:
DIRECTORS:
Andrew H. Card, Jr.*
Erroll B. Davis, Jr.*
Thomas J. Donohue*
Archie W. Dunham*
Judith Richards Hope*
Charles C. Krulak*
* By /s/ James J. Theisen, Jr.
James J. Theisen, Jr., Attorney-in-fact
89
SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Millions, for the Years Ended December 31,
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Balance, beginning of period
Charges/(reduction) to expense
Net recoveries/(write-offs)
Balance, end of period
Allowance for doubtful accounts are presented in the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as follows:
Current
Long-term
Balance, end of period
Accrued casualty costs:
Balance, beginning of period
Charges to expense
Cash payments and other reductions
Balance, end of period
Accrued casualty costs are presented in the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as follows:
Current
Long-term
Balance, end of period
2013
2012
2011
$
37
(4)
(10)
$
50
(1)
(12)
23
$
37
$
$
$
$
1
22
23
734
188
(220)
$
$
$
4
33
37
778
190
(234)
56
-
(6)
50
9
41
50
905
110
(237)
702
$
734
$
778
207
495
702
$
$
213
521
734
$
$
249
529
778
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
90
UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION
Exhibit Index
Exhibit No.
Description
Filed with this Statement
10(a)
10(b)
10(c)
10(d)
10(e)
12
21
23
24
31(a)
31(b)
32
101
Form of Performance Stock Unit Agreement dated February 6, 2014.
Form of Stock Unit Agreement for Executives dated February 6, 2014.
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Executives dated February 6,
2014.
Union Pacific Corporation Key Employee Continuity Plan, as amended February
6, 2014.
Deferred Compensation Plan (409A Non-Grandfathered Component) of Union
Pacific Corporation, as amended December 16, 2013.
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
List of the Corporation’s significant subsidiaries and their respective states of
incorporation.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent.
Powers of attorney executed by the directors of UPC.
Certifications Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), of the Exchange Act, as Adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – John J. Koraleski.
Certifications Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), of the Exchange Act, as Adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Robert M. Knight,
Jr.
Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – John J. Koraleski and Robert
M. Knight, Jr.
eXtensible Business Reporting Language
(XBRL) documents submitted
electronically: 101.INS (XBRL Instance Document), 101.SCH (XBRL Taxonomy
(XBRL Calculation Linkbase
Extension Schema Document), 101.CAL
Document), 101.LAB (XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document), 101.DEF
(XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document) and 101.PRE
(XBRL
Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document). The following financial and related
information from Union Pacific Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2013 (filed with the SEC on February 7, 2014), is
formatted in XBRL and submitted electronically herewith: (i) Consolidated
Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011,
(ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended
December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, (iv) Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and
2011, (v) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Shareholders’ Equity
for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and (vi) the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.
91
Incorporated by Reference
3(a)
3(b)
4(a)
4(b)
4(c)
4(d)
4(e)
4(f)
4(g)
4(h)
10(f)
10(g)
10(h)
Restated Articles of Incorporation of UPC, as amended and restated through
June 27, 2011, are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the
Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2011.
By-Laws of UPC, as amended, effective May 14, 2009, are incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K
dated May 15, 2009.
Indenture, dated as of December 20, 1996, between UPC and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as successor to Citibank, N.A., as Trustee, is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to UPC’s Registration Statement on Form S-3
(No. 333-18345).
Indenture, dated as of April 1, 1999, between UPC and The Bank of New York,
as successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank, formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank,
as Trustee, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to UPC’s
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-75989).
Form of 2.250% Notes due 2019 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 10, 2014.
Form of 3.750% Note due 2024 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 10, 2014.
Form of 4.850% due 2044 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the
Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 10, 2014.
Form of 4.750% Note due 2043 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to the Corporation’s Current report on Form 8-K dated October 28, 2013.
Form of 2.750% Note due 2023 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 15, 2013.
Form of 4.250% Note due 2043 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2
to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 15, 2013.
Certain instruments evidencing long-term indebtedness of UPC are not filed as
exhibits because the total amount of securities authorized under any single such
instrument does not exceed 10% of the Corporation’s total consolidated assets.
UPC agrees to furnish the Commission with a copy of any such instrument upon
request by the Commission.
Supplemental Thrift Plan (409A Non-Grandfathered Component) of Union Pacific
Corporation, as amended March 1, 2013, is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10(c) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2013.
Supplemental Thrift Plan (409A Grandfathered Component) of Union Pacific
Corporation, as amended March 1, 2013, is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10(d) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2013.
Supplemental Pension Plan for Officers and Managers (409A Non-Grandfathered
Component) of Union Pacific Corporation and Affiliates, as amended February 1,
2013, and March 1, 2013, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(e) to
the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2013.
92
10(i)
10(j)
10(k)
10(l)
10(m)
10(n)
10(o)
10(p)
10(q)
10(r)
10(s)
Supplemental Pension Plan for Officers and Managers (409A Grandfathered
Component) of Union Pacific Corporation and Affiliates, as amended February 1,
2013, and March 1, 2013 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to
the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2013.
Union Pacific Corporation Executive Incentive Plan, effective May 5, 2005,
amended and restated effective January 1, 2009, is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
Deferred Compensation Plan (409A Grandfathered Component) of Union Pacific
Corporation, as amended March 1, 2013, is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10(b) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2013.
Union Pacific Corporation 2000 Directors Plan, effective as of April 21, 2000, as
amended November 16, 2006, January 30, 2007 and January 1, 2009 is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to the Corporation’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Union Pacific Corporation Stock Unit Grant and Deferred Compensation Plan for
the Board of Directors (409A Non-Grandfathered Component), effective as of
January 1, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(k) to the
Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.
Union Pacific Corporation Stock Unit Grant and Deferred Compensation Plan for
the Board of Directors (409A Grandfathered Component), as amended and
restated in its entirety, effective as of January 1, 2009 is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(l) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
Union Pacific Corporation 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 16, 2013, is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Corporation’s Form S-8
dated May 17, 2013.
UPC 2004 Stock Incentive Plan amended March 1, 2013,, is incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.
UPC 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended March 1, 2013, is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.
Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 12,
1996, among UPC, UP Holding Company, Inc., Union Pacific Merger Co. and
Southern Pacific Rail Corporation (SP) is incorporated herein by reference to
Annex J to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus included in Post-Effective
Amendment No. 2 to UPC’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 33-64707).
Agreement, dated September 25, 1995, among UPC, UPRR, Missouri Pacific
Railroad Company (MPRR), SP, Southern Pacific Transportation Company
(SPT), The Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company (D&RGW), St.
Louis Southwestern Railway Company (SLSRC) and SPCSL Corp. (SPCSL), on
the one hand, and Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BN) and The
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (Santa Fe), on the other
hand, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to UPC’s Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (No. 33-64707).
93
10(t)
10(u)
10(v)
10(w)
10(x)
10(y)
10(z)
10(aa)
10(bb)
10(cc)
Supplemental Agreement, dated November 18, 1995, between UPC, UPRR,
MPRR, SP, SPT, D&RGW, SLSRC and SPCSL, on the one hand, and BN and
Santa Fe, on the other hand, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12
to UPC’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 33-64707).
The Pension Plan for Non-Employee Directors of UPC, as amended January 25,
1996, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(w) to the Corporation’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.
Charitable Contribution Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Union Pacific
Corporation is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(z) to the
Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1995.
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Executives is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Form of Stock Unit Agreement for Executives is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(b) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2012.
Form of 2011 Long Term Plan Stock Unit Agreement is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2010.
Form of 2012 Long Term Plan Stock Unit Agreement is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2011.
Form of 2013 Long Term Plan Stock Unit Agreement is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2012.
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Directors is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004.
Executive Incentive Plan (2005) – Deferred Compensation Program, dated
December 21, 2005 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the
Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.
94
Exhibit 12
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Millions, Except for Ratios
Fixed charges:
Interest expense including
amortization of debt discount
Portion of rentals representing an interest factor
Total fixed charges
Earnings available for fixed charges:
Net income
Equity earnings net of distributions
Income taxes
Fixed charges
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
$
$
526
121
647
$
$
535
132
667
$
$
572
135
707
$
$
602
136
738
$
$
600
155
755
$ 4,388
$ 3,943
$ 3,292
$ 2,780
(57)
2,660
647
(55)
2,375
667
(38)
1,972
707
(44)
1,653
738
$ 1,890
(42)
1,084
755
Earnings available for fixed charges
$ 7,638
$ 6,930
$ 5,933
$ 5,127
$ 3,687
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
11.8
10.4
8.4
6.9
4.9
95
SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION
Name of Corporation
State of
Incorporation
Union Pacific Railroad Company ......................................................................
Southern Pacific Rail Corporation .....................................................................
Delaware
Utah
Exhibit 21
96
Exhibit 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 33-12513, Registration Statement No. 33-53968, Registration Statement No. 33-49785,
Registration Statement No. 33-49849, Registration Statement No. 333-10797, Registration Statement No.
333-13115, Registration Statement No. 333-88709, Registration Statement No. 333-61856, Registration
Statement No. 333-42768, Registration Statement No. 333-106707, Registration Statement No. 333-
106708, Registration Statement No. 333-105714, Registration Statement No. 333-105715, Registration
Statement No. 333-116003, Registration Statement No. 333-132324, Registration Statement No. 333-
155708, Registration Statement No. 333-170209, Registration Statement No. 333-170208, and
Registration No. 333-188761 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-164842 and Registration
No. 333-186548 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 7, 2014, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies (the
Corporation) and the effectiveness of the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting, appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies for the year
ended December 31, 2013.
Omaha, Nebraska
February 7, 2014
97
Exhibit 24
UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION
Powers of Attorney
Each of the undersigned directors of Union Pacific Corporation, a Utah corporation (the Company), do
hereby appoint each of John J. Koraleski, Diane K. Duren, and James J. Theisen, Jr. his or her true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, to sign on his or her behalf the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-
K, for the year ended December 31, 2013, and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of Attorney as of February 6, 2014.
/s/ Andrew H. Card, Jr.
Andrew H. Card, Jr.
/s/ Erroll B. Davis, Jr.
Erroll B. Davis, Jr.
/s/ Thomas J. Donohue
Thomas J. Donohue
/s/ Archie W. Dunham
Archie W. Dunham
/s/ Judith Richards Hope
Judith Richards Hope
/s/ Charles C. Krulak
Charles C. Krulak
/s/ Michael R. McCarthy
Michael R. McCarthy
/s/ Michael W. McConnell
Michael W. McConnell
/s/ Thomas F. McLarty III
Thomas F. McLarty III
/s/ Steven R. Rogel
Steven R. Rogel
/s/ Jose H. Villarreal
Jose H. Villarreal
/s/ James R. Young
James R. Young
98
Exhibit 31(a)
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, John J. Koraleski, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Union Pacific Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 7, 2014
/s/ John J. Koraleski
John J. Koraleski
President and
Chief Executive Officer
99
Exhibit 31(b)
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Robert M. Knight, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Union Pacific Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 7, 2014
/s/ Robert M. Knight, Jr.
Robert M. Knight, Jr.
Executive Vice President – Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
100
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32
In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Union Pacific Corporation (the Corporation) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Koraleski, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
By: /s/ John J. Koraleski
John J. Koraleski
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Union Pacific Corporation
February 7, 2014
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Corporation
and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Union Pacific Corporation (the Corporation) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Knight, Jr., Executive Vice President - Finance
and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
By: /s/ Robert M. Knight, Jr.
Robert M. Knight, Jr.
Executive Vice President - Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
Union Pacific Corporation
February 7, 2014
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Corporation
and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
101