United Natural Foods Annual Report 2015

← All annual reports

FY2015 Annual Report · United Natural Foods

Loading PDF…

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(cid:2)

(cid:3)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015

or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from

Commission File Number: 0-21531

UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

05-0376157
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, RI 02908
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(401) 528-8634

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities

Act. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the

Act. Yes (cid:3) No (cid:2)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every

Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3)

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and

will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K (cid:3)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a

smaller reporting company. See the definitions of ‘‘large accelerated filer,’’ ‘‘accelerated filer’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer (cid:2)
Non-accelerated Filer (cid:3) (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Accelerated Filer (cid:3)
Smaller Reporting Company (cid:3)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes (cid:3) No (cid:2)

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $3,869,497,158 based upon the

closing price of the registrant’s common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market(cid:4) on January 30, 2015. The number of shares of
the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of September 11, 2015 was 50,100,946.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on December 16, 2015 are
incorporated herein by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC.

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section

Part I

Item 1.

Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Executive Officers of the Registrant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 2.

Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part II

Item 5.

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of

Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial

Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 11.

Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related

Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . .

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

PART I.

Unless otherwise specified, references to ‘‘United Natural Foods,’’ ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ ‘‘our’’ or ‘‘the
Company’’ in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (‘‘Annual Report’’ or ‘‘Report’’) mean United Natural
Foods, Inc. and all entities included in our consolidated financial statements. See the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in ‘‘Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data’’ of this Report for information regarding our financial performance.

Overview

We believe we are a leading distributor based on sales of natural, organic and specialty foods and

non-food products in the United States and Canada, and that our thirty-one distribution centers,
representing approximately 7.7 million square feet of warehouse space, provide us with the largest
capacity of any North American-based distributor in the natural, organic and specialty products
industry. We offer more than 85,000 high-quality natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food
products, consisting of national, regional and private label brands grouped into six product categories:
grocery and general merchandise, produce, perishables and frozen foods, nutritional supplements and
sports nutrition, bulk and foodservice products and personal care items. We serve more than 40,000
customer locations primarily located across the United States and Canada which can be classified as
follows:

(cid:129) independently owned natural products retailers, which include buying clubs;

(cid:129) supernatural chains, which consist solely of Whole Foods Market, Inc. (‘‘Whole Foods Market’’);

(cid:129) conventional supermarkets, which include mass market chains; and

(cid:129) other, which includes foodservice and international customers outside of Canada.

We were the first organic food distribution network in the United States designated as a ‘‘Certified

Organic Distributor’’ by Quality Assurance International, Inc. (‘‘QAI’’), an organic certifying agency
accredited by the United States Department of Agriculture (‘‘USDA’’). This process involved a
comprehensive review by QAI of our operating and purchasing systems and procedures. This
certification covers all of our broadline distribution centers in the United States, except our primarily
specialty products distribution center in Leicester, Massachusetts and facilities acquired in the
acquisition of Tony’s Fine Foods (‘‘Tony’s’’). Although not designated as a ‘‘Certified Organic
Distributor’’ by QAI, the four Tony’s California locations are certified as Organic by the State of
California Departments of Public Health Food and Drug Branch. In addition, three of our Canadian
distribution centers are certified organic by either QAI, EcoCert Canada or ProCert Canada, while the
remaining Canadian distribution center sells only Kosher foods and is therefore not certified organic.

Since the formation of our predecessor in 1976, we have grown our business both organically and

through acquisitions which have expanded our distribution network, product selection and customer
base. Since fiscal 2005, our net sales have increased at a compounded annual growth rate of 14.8%. In
recent years, our sales to existing and new customers have increased through the continued growth of
the natural and organic products industry in general; our efforts to increase the number of conventional
supermarket customers to whom we distribute products; increased market share through our
high-quality service and broader product selection, including specialty products, the acquisition of, or
merger with, natural, organic, and specialty product distributors; the expansion of our existing
distribution centers; the construction of new distribution centers; the introduction of new products and
the development of our own line of natural and organic branded products. Through these efforts, we
believe that we have broadened our geographic penetration, expanded our customer base, enhanced
and diversified our product selection and increased our market share.

We have been the primary distributor to Whole Foods Market for more than seventeen years.

Under the terms of our agreement with Whole Foods Market, we serve as the primary distributor to
Whole Foods Market in all of its regions in the United States. Our agreement with Whole Foods
Market expires on September 25, 2020.

In July 2014, we completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding capital stock of Tony’s, through

our wholly-owned subsidiary UNFI West, Inc. (‘‘UNFI West’’), for consideration of approximately
$202.7 million. With the completion of the transaction, Tony’s is now a wholly-owned subsidiary and
continues to operate as Tony’s Fine Foods. Founded in 1934 by the Ingoglia family, Tony’s is
headquartered in West Sacramento, California and is a leading distributor of perishable food products,
including a wide array of specialty protein, cheese, deli, food service and bakery goods to retail and
specialty grocers, food service customers and other distribution companies principally located
throughout the Western United States, as well as Alaska and Hawaii. We believe that the acquisition of
Tony’s accomplished certain of our strategic objectives as Tony’s has provided us with a platform for
expanding both our high-growth perishable product offerings and our distribution footprint in the
Western Region of the United States.

During fiscal 2015, we began shipping customers both center of the store products and fresh,
perishable products. Our customers utilized both UNFI’s broadline and Tony’s offerings, including
grocery, refrigerated, protein, specialty cheese and prepared foods. Our customers’ broad utilization
supports our belief that there is significant value in UNFI’s position as a leading provider of logistics,
distribution and category management for both center store and perimeter products. Additionally, we
believe that gourmet and ethnic products and fresh foods represent significant incremental growth
opportunities for UNFI.

Our ability to distribute specialty food items (including ethnic, kosher and gourmet products) has
accelerated our expansion into a number of high-growth business markets and allowed us to establish
immediate market share in the fast-growing specialty foods market. We have now integrated specialty
food products and natural and organic specialty non-food items into all of our broadline distribution
centers across the United States and Canada. Due to our expansion into specialty foods, over the past
several fiscal years we have been awarded new business with a number of conventional supermarkets
that previously had not done business with us because we did not distribute specialty products. We
believe that the distribution of these products enhances our conventional supermarket business channel
and that our complementary product lines continue to present opportunities for cross-selling.

In June 2011, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with L&R Distributors, Inc. (‘‘L&R
Distributors’’) pursuant to which we agreed to sell our conventional non-foods and general merchandise
lines of business, including certain inventory related to these product lines. This divestiture was
completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, and has allowed us to concentrate on our core business of
the distribution of natural, organic, and specialty foods and non-food products.

We are a Delaware corporation based in Providence, Rhode Island, and we conduct business
through our various wholly owned subsidiaries. We operated thirty-one distribution centers at our 2015
fiscal year end, and we believe that our approximately 7.7 million square feet of distribution space
provide us with the largest capacity of any distributor that solely distributes natural, organic and
specialty products in the United States or Canada.

We operate thirteen natural products retail stores within the United States, located primarily in

Florida (with two locations in Maryland and one in Massachusetts), through our subsidiary doing
business as Earth Origins Market (‘‘Earth Origins’’). We believe that our retail business serves as a
natural complement to our distribution business because it enables us to develop new marketing
programs and improve customer service. In addition, our subsidiary doing business as Woodstock Farms
Manufacturing specializes in the international importation, roasting, packaging and distribution of nuts,

dried fruit, seeds, trail mixes, granola, natural and organic snack items and confections for our
customers and in branded products of our own.

Our Industry

The natural products industry encompasses a wide range of products including organic and
non-organic foods, nutritional, herbal and sports supplements, toiletries and personal care items,
naturally-based cosmetics, natural/homeopathic medicines, pet products and cleaning agents. According
to The Natural Foods Merchandiser, a leading natural products industry trade publication, sales for all
types of natural products were $120.4 billion in calendar 2014, a growth of $11.6 billion or
approximately 10.7% from calendar 2013. According to the National Association for the Specialty Food
Trade, a leading specialty food industry trade publication, sales in calendar 2014 were $109.0 billion,
representing growth of 19% from calendar 2012. We believe the growth of the natural products
industry is a result of the increasing demand by consumers for a healthy lifestyle, food safety and
environmental sustainability.

Our Operating Structure

Our operations are comprised of three principal operating divisions. These operating divisions are:

(cid:129) our wholesale division, which includes our broadline natural, organic and specialty distribution

business in the United States, our wholly-owned subsidiary, UNFI Canada, Inc. (‘‘UNFI
Canada’’), which is our natural, organic and specialty distribution business in Canada, Tony’s,
which is a leading distributor of a wide array of specialty protein, cheese, deli, food service and
bakery goods, principally throughout the Western United States, Albert’s Organics, Inc.
(‘‘Albert’s’’), which is a leading distributor within the United States of organically grown produce
and non-produce perishable items, and Select Nutrition, which distributes vitamins, minerals and
supplements;

(cid:129) our retail division, consisting of Earth Origins, which operates our thirteen natural products

retail stores within the United States; and

(cid:129) our manufacturing and branded products divisions, consisting of Woodstock Farms

Manufacturing, which specializes in the international importation, roasting, packaging and
distribution of nuts, dried fruit, seeds, trail mixes, granola, natural and organic snack items and
confections, and our Blue Marble Brands product lines.

Wholesale Division

Our broadline distribution business is organized into three regions—our Eastern Region, Western

Region and our Canadian Region. We distribute natural, organic and specialty products in all of our
product categories to customers in the Eastern and Midwestern portions of the United States through
our Eastern Region and to customers in the Western and Central portions of the United States through
our Western Region. Our Canadian Region distributes natural, organic and specialty products in all of
our product categories to all of our customers in Canada. As of our 2015 fiscal year end, our Eastern
Region operated eleven distribution centers, which provided approximately 3.9 million square feet of
warehouse space, our Western Region operated six distribution centers, which provided approximately
2.6 million square feet of warehouse space and our Canadian Region operated four distribution centers,
which provided approximately 0.3 million square feet of warehouse space.

Through Tony’s, we distribute perishable food products, including a wide array of specialty protein,
cheese, deli, food service and bakery goods. Tony’s operates out of four distribution centers strategically
located on the West coast in California and Washington, providing approximately 0.5 million square

feet of warehouse space. The four California locations are certified as Organic by the State of
California Departments of Public Health Food and Drug Branch.

Through Albert’s, we distribute organically grown produce and non-produce perishables, such as

organic milk, dressings, eggs, juices, poultry and various other refrigerated specialty items. Albert’s
operates out of four distribution centers strategically located throughout the United States, providing
approximately 0.3 million square feet of warehouse space, and is designated as a ‘‘Certified Organic
Distributor’’ by QAI.

Through Select Nutrition, we distribute more than 15,000 health and beauty aids, vitamins,

minerals and supplements from distribution centers in Pennsylvania and California.

Certain of our distribution centers are shared by multiple operations within our wholesale division.

Retail Division

We operate thirteen natural products retail stores as Earth Origins within the United States, ten of

which are located in Florida, two in Maryland and one in Massachusetts. We believe that our retail
business serves as a natural complement to our distribution business because it enables us to see
market trends, develop new marketing programs and receive direct customer feedback.

We believe our natural products retail stores have a number of advantages over their competitors,

including our financial strength and marketing expertise, the purchasing power resulting from group
purchasing by stores within Earth Origins and the breadth of our product selection.

We believe that we benefit from certain advantages in acting as a distributor to our natural

products retail stores, including our ability to:

(cid:129) control the purchases made by these stores;

(cid:129) expand the number of high-growth, high-margin product categories, such as produce and

prepared foods, within these stores; and

(cid:129) stay abreast of the trends in the retail marketplace, which enables us to better anticipate and

serve the needs of our wholesale customers.

Additionally, as the primary natural products distributor to our retail locations, we realize

significant economies of scale and operating and buying efficiencies. As an operator of natural products
retail stores, we also have the ability to test market select products prior to offering them nationally.
We can then evaluate consumer reaction to the product without incurring significant inventory risk. We
also are able to test new marketing and promotional programs within our stores prior to offering them
to our wholesale customer base.

Manufacturing & Branded Products Divisions

Our subsidiary, Woodstock Farms Manufacturing, specializes in the international importation,
roasting, packaging and distribution of nuts, dried fruit, seeds, trail mixes, granola, natural and organic
snack items and confections. We sell these items in bulk and through private label packaging
arrangements with large health food, supermarket and convenience store chains and independent
owners. We operate an organic (USDA and QAI) and kosher (Circle K) certified packaging, roasting,
and processing facility in New Jersey that is SQF (Safety Quality Food) level 2 certified.

Our Blue Marble Brands portfolio is a collection of 15 organic, natural and specialty food brands

representing more than 650 unique products. We have a dedicated team of marketing, supply chain and
sales professionals that have a passion to energize our retail partners and provide consumers with
affordable Non-GMO foods. Our unique Blue Marble Brands products are sold through our wholesale
division, third-party distributors and directly to retailers. Our Field Day(cid:4) brand is primarily sold to

customers in our independent natural products retailer channel (‘‘independent retailers’’), and is meant
to serve as a private label brand for independent retailers to allow them to compete with conventional
supermarkets and supernatural chains which often have their own private label store brands.

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe we distinguish ourselves from our competitors through the following strengths:

We are a market leader with a nationwide presence in the United States and Canada.

We believe that we are the largest distributor of natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food
products by sales in the United States and Canada, and one of the few distributors capable of meeting
the natural, organic and specialty product needs of regional and local independent retailer customers,
conventional supermarket chains, and the supernatural chain. The opening of a new larger Albert’s
facility in New Jersey in May 2013 and a new facility in Hudson Valley, New York in September 2014
has provided additional space to serve the growing New York City metropolitan market. We believe the
consolidation into a new, larger, facility in Aurora, Colorado in May 2013 and the opening of our
Racine and Prescott, Wisconsin facilities in June 2014 and April 2015, respectively, will allow us to
serve these growing markets with greater operational efficiencies. We believe that our network of
thirty-one distribution centers (including four in Canada) creates significant advantages over smaller
national and regional distributors. Our nationwide presence across the United States and Canada
allows us to in many instances have locations closer to our customers than our competitors, offer
marketing and customer service programs across regions, offer a broader product selection and provide
operational excellence with high service levels and same day or next day on-time deliveries.

We are an efficient distributor.

We believe that our scale affords us significant benefits within a highly fragmented industry
including volume purchasing opportunities and warehouse and distribution efficiencies. Our continued
growth has allowed us to expand our existing facilities and open new facilities as we seek to achieve
maximum operating efficiencies, including reduced fuel and other transportation costs, and has created
sufficient capacity for future growth. Some of the efficiency improvements we have instituted include
the centralization of general and administrative functions, the consolidation of systems applications
among physical locations and regions and the optimization of customer distribution routes, all of which
reduced expenses. We have made significant investments in our people, facilities, equipment and
technology to broaden our footprint and enhance the efficiency of our operations. Key examples in the
last several years include the following:

(cid:129) In connection with the acquisition of certain Canadian food distribution assets of the SunOpta

Distribution Group business of SunOpta, Inc. in June 2010, we acquired five distribution centers
which provided a nationwide presence in Canada with approximately 286,000 square feet of
distribution space and the ability to serve all major markets in Canada.

(cid:129) In September 2010 we commenced operations at a new facility in Lancaster, Texas serving

customers throughout the Southwestern United States, including Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico,
Arkansas and Louisiana.

(cid:129) During July 2011 we completed the integration of specialty food products into our nationwide

platform.

(cid:129) In May 2013 our Albert’s division commenced operations at a new facility in Logan Township,
New Jersey with 55,000 square feet of distribution space to more efficiently serve our growing
customer base on the East Coast, including the New York City metropolitan market.

(cid:129) In June 2013 we commenced operations at a new 540,000 square foot distribution center in

Aurora, Colorado and consolidated all existing Aurora operations including an Albert’s location
and off-site storage into one building.

(cid:129) In June 2014 we commenced operations at a new 450,000 square foot distribution center in

Racine, Wisconsin.

(cid:129) In connection with the acquisition of Tony’s in July 2014, we acquired four distribution centers in

California and Washington with approximately 500,000 square feet of distribution space.

(cid:129) In September 2014 we commenced operations at a new 510,000 square foot distribution center

in Hudson Valley, New York which allows us to service the growing New York City metropolitan
market and to transfer certain routes from our York, Pennsylvania, Chesterfield, New Hampshire
and Dayville, Connecticut distribution centers.

(cid:129) In April 2015 we commenced operations at a new 300,000 square foot distribution center in

Prescott, Wisconsin which services the Twin Cities market.

We have extensive and long-standing customer relationships and provide superior service.

Throughout the 39 years of our, and our predecessors’ operations, we have developed

long-standing customer relationships, which we believe are among the strongest in our industry. In
particular, we have been the primary supplier of natural and organic products to the largest
supernatural chain in the United States, Whole Foods Market, for more than 17 years. We believe a
key driver of our strong customer loyalty is our superior service levels, which include accurate
fulfillment of orders, timely product delivery, competitive prices and a high level of product marketing
support. Our average broadline distribution in-stock service level for fiscal 2015, measured as the
percentage of items ordered by customers that are delivered by the requested delivery date (excluding
manufacturer out-of-stocks and discontinued items), was approximately 97%. We believe that our high
distribution service levels are attributable to our experienced inventory planning and replenishment
department and sophisticated warehousing, inventory control and distribution systems. Furthermore, we
offer next-day delivery service to a majority of our active customers and offer multiple deliveries each
week to our largest customers, which we believe differentiates us from many of our competitors.

We have an experienced, motivated management team.

Our management team has extensive experience in the retail and distribution business, including
the natural, organic and specialty product industries. On average, each of our ten executive officers has
over twenty-four years of experience in the retail, natural products or food distribution industry.
Furthermore, a significant portion of our management-level employees’ compensation is equity based or
performance based, and, therefore management is incentivized to seek to, generate strong operating
results in the future.

Our Growth Strategy

We seek to maintain and enhance our position within the natural and organic industry in the
United States and Canada and to increase our market share in the specialty products industry. Since
our formation, we have grown our business organically and through the acquisition of a number of
distributors and suppliers, which has expanded our distribution network, product selection and
customer base. For example, we acquired our Albert’s, UNFI Canada, Earth Origins, Woodstock Farms
Manufacturing, Tony’s and specialty businesses.

Beginning in fiscal 2009, our strategic plan has focused on increasing market share, particularly in

our conventional supermarket channel. This channel typically generates lower gross margins than our
independent retailer channel, but also typically has lower operating expenses. With our acquisition of

Tony’s we have moved more heavily into the growing market of perishable food products. Our strategic
plan also includes the roll-out of new technology including a national warehouse management and
procurement system and transportation management system upgrade. These steps and others are
intended to promote operational efficiencies and further reduce our operating expenses to offset the
lower gross margins we expect with increased sales to the conventional supermarket and supernatural
channels and from sales of our fresh perishable products, which can sell for a lower gross margin than
our other natural, organic and specialty products.

To implement our growth strategy, we intend to continue increasing our market share of the
growing natural and organic products industry by expanding our customer base, increasing our share of
existing customers’ business and continuing to expand and further penetrate new distribution territories.
We plan to expand our presence within the specialty industry by offering new and existing customers a
single wholesale distributor capable of meeting their specialty and natural and organic product needs
on a national or regional basis. Key elements of our strategy include:

Expanding Our Customer Base

As of August 1, 2015, we served more than 40,000 customer locations primarily in the United
States and Canada. We plan to expand our coverage of the natural and organic and specialty products
industry by cultivating new customer relationships within the industry and by further developing our
existing channels of distribution, such as independent natural products retailers, conventional
supermarkets, mass market outlets, institutional foodservice providers, buying clubs, restaurants and
gourmet stores. With the coordinated distribution of our specialty products with our natural and
organic products, including our increased array of specialty protein, cheese, deli, food service and
bakery offerings as a result of our acquisition of Tony’s, we believe that we have the opportunity to
continue gaining market share in the conventional supermarket channel as the result of our ability to
offer an integrated and efficient distribution solution for our customers. We have gained new business
from a number of conventional supermarket customers, including Giant-Landover, Giant Eagle,
Shop-Rite, and Kings, partially as a result of our complementary product selection.

Increasing Our Market Share of Existing Customers’ Business

We believe that we are the primary distributor of natural and organic products to the majority of

our natural products customer base, including to Whole Foods Market, our largest customer. We intend
to maintain our position as the primary supplier for a majority of our customers, and to add to the
number of customers for which we serve as primary supplier by offering the broadest product selection
in our industry at competitive prices. With the expansion of fresh, perishable and specialty product
offerings, including proteins, cheeses and deli items as a result of the Tony’s acquisition, we believe that
we have the ability to further meet our existing customers’ needs for specialty foods and non-food
products, representing an opportunity to continue to grow within the conventional supermarket,
supernatural and independent channels.

Continuing to Improve the Efficiency of Our Nationwide Distribution Network

We have invested more than $415 million in our distribution network and infrastructure over the

past five fiscal years. In fiscal 2013 we began operations at our new Albert’s distribution facility in
Logan, New Jersey, and we commenced operations at a new 540,000 square foot distribution center in
Aurora, Colorado consolidating all existing Aurora operations, including an Albert’s location and
off-site storage, into one building. In fiscal 2014 we commenced operations at our new distribution
center in Racine, Wisconsin. Our multi-year expansion plan continues to progress as we commenced
operations at our new distribution center in Hudson Valley, New York in the first quarter of fiscal
2015, our new Prescott, Wisconsin facility in the third quarter of fiscal 2015, and we are currently

constructing an additional facility in Gilroy, California, from which we expect to begin operations in the
third quarter of fiscal 2016.

Further, we will strive to continue to maintain our focus on realizing efficiencies and economies of

scale in purchasing, warehousing, transportation and general and administrative functions, which,
combined with transportation expense savings and incremental fixed cost leverage, should lead to
continued improvements in our operating margin.

Expanding into Other Distribution Channels and Geographic Markets

We believe that we will be successful in continuing to expand into the foodservice channel as well

as continuing to develop our presence outside of the United States and Canada through our
relationships with brokers primarily in Asia and the Caribbean. We will continue to seek to develop
regional relationships and alliances with companies such as Aramark Corporation, the Compass Group
North America, and Sodexho Inc. in the foodservice channel and seek other alliances outside the
United States and Canada.

Continuing to Selectively Pursue Opportunistic Acquisitions

Throughout our history, we have successfully identified, consummated and integrated multiple

acquisitions. Since fiscal 2000, we have successfully completed fifteen acquisitions of distributors,
manufacturers and suppliers, the most recent being the acquisition of Tony’s in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2014. We intend to continue to selectively pursue opportunistic acquisitions to expand the breadth
of our distribution network, increase our efficiency, procure beneficial customer relationships or add
additional products and capabilities.

Continuing to Provide the Leading Distribution Solution

We believe that we provide a leading distribution solution to the natural, organic and specialty

products industry through our national presence, regional preferences, focus on customer service and
breadth of product offerings. Our service levels, which we believe to be the highest in our industry, are
attributable to our experienced inventory planning and replenishment department and our sophisticated
warehousing, inventory control and distribution systems. See ‘‘—Our Focus on Technology’’ below for
more information regarding our use of technology in our warehousing, inventory control and
distribution systems.

We also offer our customers a selection of inventory management, merchandising, marketing,

promotional and event management services designed to increase sales and enhance customer
satisfaction. These marketing services, which primarily are utilized by customers in our independently
owned natural products retailers channel and many of which are co-sponsored with suppliers, include
monthly and thematic circular programs, in-store signage and assistance in product display.

Our Customers

We maintain long-standing customer relationships with independently-owned natural products
retailers, supernatural chains and supermarket chains. In addition, we emphasize our relationships with
new customers, such as conventional supermarkets, mass market outlets and gourmet stores, which are
continually increasing their natural product offerings. The following were included among our wholesale
customers for fiscal 2015:

(cid:129) Whole Foods Market, the largest supernatural chain in the United States and Canada; and

(cid:129) conventional supermarket chains, including Kroger, Vitamin Cottage, Wegmans, Sprouts Farmers

Market, Giant-Carlisle, Stop & Shop, Giant-Landover, Giant Eagle, Hannaford, Food Lion,
Bashas’, Shop-Rite, Publix and Fred Meyer.

Whole Foods Market is our only customer that represented more than 10% of total net sales in

fiscal 2015, and accounted for approximately 35% of our net sales.

The following table lists the percentage of sales by customer type for the fiscal years ended

August 1, 2015, August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013:

Customer Type

Percentage of Net
Sales

2015

2014

2013

Independently owned natural products retailers . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Supernatural chains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Conventional supermarkets and mass market chains . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

32% 33% 34%
35% 36% 36%
26% 26% 25%
7% 5% 5%

We distribute natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food products to customers located in

the United States and Canada, as well as to customers located in other foreign countries. Our total
international sales, including those by UNFI Canada, represented approximately four percent of our
business in fiscal 2015, compared to five percent in 2014 and 2013. We believe that our sales outside
the United States, as a percentage of our total sales, will expand as we seek to continue to grow our
Canadian operations.

Our Marketing Services

We offer a variety of marketing services designed to increase sales for our customers and suppliers,

including consumer and trade marketing programs, as well as programs to support suppliers in
understanding our markets. Trade and consumer marketing programs are supplier-sponsored programs
which cater to a broad range of retail formats. These programs are designed to educate consumers,
profile suppliers and increase sales for retailers, many of which do not have the resources necessary to
conduct such marketing programs independently.

Our consumer marketing programs include:

(cid:129) multiple monthly, region-specific, consumer circular programs, which feature the logo and

address of the participating retailer imprinted on a circular that advertises products sold by the
retailer to its customers. The monthly circular programs are structured to pass through the
benefit of our negotiated discounts and advertising allowances to the retailer, and also provide
retailers with posters and shelf tags to coincide with each month’s promotions. We also offer a
web-based tool which retailers can use to produce highly customized circulars and other
marketing materials for their stores.

(cid:129) quarterly coupon programs featuring supplier sponsored coupons, for display and distribution by

participating retailers.

(cid:129) themed ‘‘Celebration’’ sales and educational brochures to drive sales and educate consumers.

Brochures are imprinted with participating retailers’ store logo and information.

(cid:129) a truck advertising program that allows our suppliers to purchase advertising space on the sides
of our hundreds of trailers traveling throughout the United States and Canada, increasing brand
exposure to consumers.

Our trade marketing programs include:

(cid:129) wholesale tri-annual catalogs, which serve as a primary reference guide and ordering tool for

retailers.

(cid:129) a website for retailers with category management tools, retail staff development resources and

other resources designed to help our customers succeed.

(cid:129) a web advertising program that allows our suppliers to purchase advertising space on the

customer section of our web site, increasing brand exposure to retailers.

(cid:129) a variety of programs with advertising focus on foodservice options designed to support accounts

in that category.

(cid:129) a variety of programs designed to feature suppliers and generate volume sales.

(cid:129) monthly specials catalogs that highlight promotions and new product introductions.

(cid:129) specialized catalogs for holiday promotions and to serve other customer needs.

Our supplier marketing programs include:
(cid:129) ClearVue(cid:4), an information sharing program designed to improve the transparency of information
and drive efficiency within the supply chain. With the availability of in-depth data and tailored
reporting tools, participants are able to reduce inventory balances with the elimination of
forward buys, while improving service levels.

(cid:129) Supply Chain by ClearVue(cid:4), an information sharing program designed to provide heightened

transparency to suppliers through demand planning, forecasting and procurement insights. This
program offers weekly and monthly reporting enabling suppliers to identify areas of sales growth
while pinpointing specific focuses in which the supplier can become more profitable.

(cid:129) SIS, an information-sharing program that helps our suppliers better understand our customers’
businesses, in order to generate mutually beneficial incremental sales in an efficient manner.

(cid:129) Growth incentive programs, supplier-focused high-level sales and marketing support for selected

brands, which foster our partnership by building incremental, mutually profitable sales for
suppliers and us.

We keep current with the latest trends in the industry. Periodically, we conduct focus group
sessions with certain key retailers and suppliers to ascertain their needs and allow us to better service
them. We also:

(cid:129) produce a quarterly report of trends in the natural and organic industry;

(cid:129) provide product data information such as best seller lists, store usage reports and easy-to-use

product catalogs;

(cid:129) provide assistance with store layout designs; new store design and equipment procurement;

(cid:129) provide planogramming, shelf and category management support;

(cid:129) offer in-store signage and promotional materials, including shopping bags and end-cap displays;

(cid:129) provide assistance with planning and setting up product displays;

(cid:129) provide shelf tags for products; and

(cid:129) provide a website on which retailers can access various individual retailer-specific reports and

product information.

Our Products

Our extensive selection of high-quality natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food products

enables us to provide a primary source of supply to a diverse base of customers whose product needs
vary significantly. We offer more than 85,000 high-quality natural, organic and specialty foods and
non-food products, consisting of national brand, regional brand, private label and master distribution
products, in six product categories: grocery and general merchandise, produce, perishables and frozen
foods, nutritional supplements and sports nutrition, bulk and food service products and personal care
items. Our branded product lines address certain needs of our customers, including providing a
lower-cost label known as Field Day.

We continuously evaluate potential new products based on both existing and anticipated trends in

consumer preferences and buying patterns. Our Retail Category Management and Supplier
Relationship Management teams regularly attend regional and national natural, organic, specialty,
ethnic and gourmet product shows to review the latest products that are likely to be of interest to
retailers and consumers. We also utilize syndicated data as a compass to ensure that we are carrying
the right mix of products in each of our distribution centers. We make the majority of our new product
decisions at the regional level and look to carry those items through national distribution as we begin
to spot an emerging trend or brand. We believe that our category review practices at the local
distribution center level allow our supplier relationship managers to react quickly to changing consumer
preferences and to evaluate new products and new product categories regionally. Additionally, as many
of the new products that we offer are marketed on a regional basis or in our own natural products
retail stores prior to being offered nationally, this enables us to evaluate consumer reaction to the
products without incurring significant inventory risk. Furthermore, by exchanging regional product sales
information between our regions, we are able to make more informed and timely new product
decisions in each region.

We maintain a comprehensive quality assurance program. All of the products we sell that are
represented as ‘‘organic’’ are required to be certified as such by an independent third-party agency. We
maintain current certification affidavits on most organic commodities and produce in order to verify the
authenticity of the product. Most potential suppliers of organic products are required to provide such
third-party certifications to us before they are approved as suppliers.

Our Suppliers

We purchase our products from more than 9,000 suppliers. The majority of our suppliers are based
in the United States and Canada, but we also source products from suppliers throughout Europe, Asia,
Central America, South America, Africa and Australia. We believe suppliers of natural and organic
products seek to distribute their products through us because we provide access to a large and growing
customer base across the United States and Canada, distribute the majority of the suppliers’ products
and offer a wide variety of marketing programs to our customers to help sell the suppliers’ products.
Substantially all product categories that we distribute are available from a number of suppliers and,
therefore, we are not dependent on any single source of supply for any product category. In addition,
although we have exclusive distribution arrangements and vendor support programs with several
suppliers, none of our suppliers account for more than 10% of our total purchases in fiscal 2015. Our
largest supplier, Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (‘‘Hain’’), accounted for approximately 5% of our total
purchases in fiscal 2015. However, the product categories we purchase from Hain can be purchased
from a number of other suppliers.

We have positioned ourselves as one of the largest purchasers of organically grown bulk products
in the natural and organic products industry by centralizing our purchase of nuts, seeds, grains, flours
and dried foods. As a result, we are able to negotiate purchases from suppliers on the basis of volume
and other considerations that may include discounted pricing or prompt payment discounts.
Furthermore, some of our purchase arrangements include the right of return to the supplier with
respect to products that we do not sell in a certain period of time. As described under ‘‘Our Products’’
above, each region is responsible for placing its own orders and can select the products that it believes
will most appeal to its customers, although each region is able to participate in our company-wide
purchasing programs. Our outstanding commitments for the purchase of inventory were approximately
$17.5 million as of August 1, 2015.

Our Distribution System

We have carefully chosen the sites for our distribution centers to provide direct access to our
regional markets. This proximity allows us to reduce our transportation costs relative to those of our

competitors that seek to service these customers from locations that are often several hundred miles
away. We believe that we incur lower inbound freight expense than our regional competitors, because
our scale allows us to buy full and partial truckloads of products. Products are delivered to our
distribution centers primarily by our fleet of leased trucks, contract carriers and the suppliers
themselves. When financially advantageous, we backhaul between vendors or satellite, staging facilities
and our distribution centers using our own trucks. Additionally, we generally can redistribute overstocks
and inventory imbalances between distribution centers if needed, which helps to reduce out of stocks
and to sell perishable products prior to their expiration date.

We lease our trucks from national leasing companies such as Ryder Truck Leasing and Penske
Truck Leasing, which in some cases maintain facilities on our premises for the maintenance and service
of these vehicles. Other trucks are leased from regional firms that offer competitive services.

We ship certain orders for supplements or for items that are destined for areas outside of regular

delivery routes through United Parcel Service and other independent carriers. Deliveries to areas
outside the continental United States and Canada are typically shipped by ocean-going containers on a
weekly basis.

Our Focus on Technology

We have made significant investments in distribution, financial, information and warehouse

management systems. We continually evaluate and upgrade our management information systems at our
regional operations in an effort to make the systems more efficient, cost-effective and responsive to
customer needs. These systems include functionality in radio frequency inventory control, pick-to-voice
systems, pick-to-light systems, computer-assisted order processing and slot locator/retrieval assignment
systems. At our receiving docks, warehouse associates attach computer-generated, preprinted locator
tags to inbound products. These tags contain the expiration date, locations, quantity, lot number and
other information about the products in bar code format. Customer returns are processed by scanning
the UPC bar codes. We also employ a management information system that enables us to lower our
inbound transportation costs by making optimum use of our own fleet of trucks or by consolidating
deliveries into full truckloads. Orders from multiple suppliers and multiple distribution centers are
consolidated into single truckloads for efficient use of available vehicle capacity and return-haul trips.
In addition, we utilize route efficiency software that assists us in developing the most efficient routes
for our outbound trucks. We are in the process of rolling out a national warehouse management and
procurement system to convert our existing facilities into a single warehouse management and supply
chain platform (‘‘WMS’’). We have completed WMS system conversions at our Lancaster, Texas,
Ridgefield, Washington, Auburn, Washington, Prescott, Wisconsin, Racine, Wisconsin, Hudson Valley,
New York and Auburn, California facilities, and we expect to complete the roll-out to all existing
facilities by the end of fiscal 2018.

Intellectual Property

We do not own or have the right to use any patent, trademark, trade name, license, franchise, or

concession which upon loss would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or
financial condition.

Competition

Our largest competition comes from direct distribution, whereby a customer reaches a product
volume level that justifies distribution directly from the manufacturer in order to obtain a lower price.
Our major wholesale distribution competitor in both the United States and Canada is KeHE
Distributors, LLC (‘‘Kehe’’). In addition to its natural and organic products, Kehe distributes specialty
food products and markets its own private label program. Kehe’s subsidiary, Tree of Life, has also

earned QAI certification. We also compete in the United States and Canada with numerous smaller
regional and local distributors of natural, organic, ethnic, kosher, gourmet and other specialty foods
that focus on niche or regional markets, and with national, regional and local distributors of
conventional groceries and companies that distribute to their own retail facilities.

We believe that distributors in the natural and specialty products industries primarily compete on
distribution service levels, product quality, depth of inventory selection, price and quality of customer
service. We believe that we currently compete effectively with respect to each of these factors.

Our natural products retail stores compete against other natural products outlets, conventional
supermarkets and specialty stores. We believe that retailers of natural products compete principally on
product quality and selection, price, customer service, knowledge of personnel and convenience of
location. We believe that we currently compete effectively with respect to each of these factors.

Government Regulation

Our operations and many of the products that we distribute in the United States are subject to
regulation by state and local health departments, the USDA and the United States Food and Drug
Administration (the ‘‘FDA’’), which generally impose standards for product quality and sanitation and
are responsible for the administration of bioterrorism legislation. In the United States, our facilities
generally are inspected at least once annually by state or federal authorities. For certain product lines,
we are also subject to the Federal Meat Inspection Act, the Poultry Products Inspection Act, the
Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, the Packers and Stockyard Act and regulations promulgated
by the USDA to interpret and implement these statutory provisions. The USDA imposes standards for
product safety, quality and sanitation through the federal meat and poultry inspection program.

In late 2010, the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (‘‘FSMA’’) was enacted. The FSMA
represents a significant expansion of food safety requirements and FDA food safety authorities and,
among other things, requires that the FDA impose comprehensive, prevention-based controls across the
food supply chain, further regulates food products imported into the United States, and provides the
FDA with mandatory recall authority. The FSMA requires the FDA to undertake numerous
rulemakings and to issue numerous guidance documents, as well as reports, plans, standards, notices,
and other tasks. As a result, implementation of the legislation is ongoing and likely to take several
years.

The Surface Transportation Board and the Federal Highway Administration regulate our trucking

operations. In addition, interstate motor carrier operations are subject to safety requirements
prescribed by the United States Department of Transportation and other relevant federal and state
agencies. Such matters as weight and dimension of equipment are also subject to federal and state
regulations.

Many of our facilities in the U.S. and in Canada are subject to various environmental protection

statutes and regulations, including those relating to the use of water resources and the discharge of
wastewater. Further, many of our distribution facilities have ammonia-based refrigeration systems and
tanks for the storage of diesel fuel, hydrogen fuel and other petroleum products which are subject to
laws regulating such systems and storage tanks. Moreover, in some of our facilities we, or third parties
with whom we contract, perform vehicle maintenance. Our policy is to comply with all applicable
environmental and safety legal requirements. We are subject to other federal, state, provincial and local
provisions relating to the protection of the environment or the discharge of materials; however, these
provisions do not materially impact the use or operation of our facilities.

The failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements could result in, among other things,

administrative, civil, or criminal penalties or fines, mandatory or voluntary product recalls, warning or
untitled letters, cease and desist orders against operations that are not in compliance, closure of

facilities or operations, the loss, revocation, or modification of any existing licenses, permits,
registrations, or approvals, or the failure to obtain additional licenses, permits, registrations, or
approvals in new jurisdictions where we intend to do business, any of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. These laws and regulations
may change in the future and we may incur material costs in our efforts to comply with current or
future laws and regulations or in any required product recalls.

We believe that we are in material compliance with all federal, provincial, state and local laws

applicable to our operations.

Employees

As of August 1, 2015, we had approximately 8,700 full and part-time employees, 428 of whom
(approximately 4.9%) are covered by collective bargaining agreements at our Edison, New Jersey,
Leicester, Massachusetts, Iowa City, Iowa, Dayville, Connecticut and Auburn, Washington facilities. The
Edison, New Jersey, Leicester, Massachusetts, Iowa City, Iowa, Auburn, Washington and Dayville,
Connecticut agreements expire in June 2017, March 2017, June 2017, February 2017 and July 2019,
respectively. We continue to believe that our relations with our employees are good.

Seasonality

Generally, we do not experience any material seasonality. However, our sales and operating results
may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to factors such as changes in our operating expenses,
management’s ability to execute our operating and growth strategies, personnel changes, demand for
our products, supply shortages and general economic conditions.

Available Information

Our internet address is http://www.unfi.com. The contents of our website are not part of this

Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our internet address is included in this document as an inactive
textual reference only. We make our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’)
available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such reports
with, or furnish such reports to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We have adopted a code of conduct and ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief

Financial Officer and employees within our finance operations, and sales departments. Our code of
conduct and ethics is publicly available on our website at www.unfi.com and is available free of charge
by writing to United Natural Foods, Inc., 313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, Rhode Island 02908, Attn:
Investor Relations. We intend to make any legally required disclosures regarding amendments to, or
waivers of, the provisions of the code of conduct and ethics on our website at www.unfi.com. Please
note that our website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Our executive officers are elected on an annual basis and serve at the discretion of our Board of

Directors. Our executive officers and their ages as of September 30, 2015 are listed below:

Name

Steven L. Spinner . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mark E. Shamber . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Age

55
46

Joseph J. Traficanti . . . . . . . . . . . .

Position

President and Chief Executive Officer
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance
Officer and Corporate Secretary

Sean F. Griffin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Eric A. Dorne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thomas A. Dziki

56 Chief Operating Officer
54
54

Craig H. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Donald P. McIntyre . . . . . . . . . . . .

Christopher P. Testa . . . . . . . . . . .

Michael P. Zechmeister . . . . . . . . .

Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer
Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resource and
Sustainability Officer
Senior Vice President, National Sales and Service and
President of the Eastern Region
Senior Vice President, National Supply Chain and Strategy
and President of the Western Region
President, Woodstock Farms Manufacturing and Blue
Marble Brands
Senior Vice President

Steven L. Spinner has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our
Board of Directors since September 2008. Mr. Spinner served as the Interim President of our Eastern
Region, after David Matthews became President of UNFI International in September 2010 and prior to
the hiring of Craig H. Smith in December 2010. Prior to joining us in September 2008, Mr. Spinner
served as a director and as Chief Executive Officer of Performance Food Group Company (‘‘PFG’’)
from October 2006 to May 2008, when PFG was acquired by affiliates of The Blackstone Group and
Wellspring Capital Management. Mr. Spinner previously had served as PFG’s President and Chief
Operating Officer beginning in May 2005. Mr. Spinner served as PFG’s Senior Vice President and
Chief Executive Officer—Broadline Division from February 2002 to May 2005 and as PFG’s Broadline
Division President from August 2001 to February 2002.

Mark E. Shamber has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since

October 2006. Mr. Shamber previously served as our Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from January 2006 until October 2006, as Vice President
and Corporate Controller from August 2005 to October 2006 and as our Corporate Controller from
June 2003 until August 2005. From February 1995 until June 2003, Mr. Shamber served in various
positions of increasing responsibility up to and including senior manager within the assurance and
advisory business systems practice at the international accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP.

Joseph J. Traficanti has served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance
Officer and Corporate Secretary since April 2009. Prior to joining us, Mr. Traficanti served as Senior
Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary of PFG from
November 2004 until April 2009.

Sean F. Griffin has served as our Chief Operating Officer since September 2014. Mr. Griffin
previously served as our Senior Vice President, Group President from June 2012 to September 2014
and as our Senior Vice President, National Distribution from January 2010 to June 2012. Prior to
joining us, Mr. Griffin was East Region Broadline President of PFG. Previously he served as President
of PFG—Springfield, MA from 2003 until 2008. He began his career with Sysco Corporation in 1986

and has held various leadership positions in the foodservice distribution industry with U.S. Foodservice,
Alliant Foodservice and Sysco Corporation.

Eric A. Dorne has served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer since September
2011. Prior to joining us, Mr. Dorne was Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for The
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., the parent company of the A&P, Pathmark, SuperFresh,
Food Emporium and Waldbaum’s supermarket chains located in the Eastern United States from
January 2011 to August 2011, and Vice President and Chief Information Officer from August 2005 to
January 2011. In his more than thirty years at The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Mr. Dorne
held various executive positions including Vice President of Enterprise IT Application Management and
Development, Vice President of Store Operations Systems and Director of Retail Support Services.

Thomas A. Dziki has served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resource and

Sustainability Officer since August 2010. Prior to August 2010, Mr. Dziki served as our Senior Vice
President of Sustainable Development since January 2010, as our Vice President of Sustainable
Development since June 2009, and as National Vice President of Real Estate and Construction since
August 2006. Prior to that time, Mr. Dziki had served as President of Woodstock Farms Manufacturing
and Select Nutrition from December 2004 until August 2006, Corporate Vice President of Special
Projects from December 2003 to November 2004 and as our Manager of Special Projects from May
2002 to December 2003. Prior to joining us, Mr. Dziki served as a private consultant to our company,
our subsidiaries, Woodstock Farms Manufacturing, Earth Origins, Albert’s, and our predecessor
company, Cornucopia Natural Foods, Inc., from 1995 to May 2002.

Craig H. Smith has served as our Senior Vice President, National Sales and Service since

September 2013 and was reappointed as President of the Eastern Region in August 2014, a position he
previously held from December 2010 to August 2013. Prior to joining us, Mr. Smith was Atlantic
Region President of U.S. Foodservice, a leading broadline foodservice distributor of national, private
label, and signature brand items in the United States from May 2008 to December 2010. In his
seventeen years at U.S. Foodservice, Mr. Smith held various executive positions including Senior Vice
President Street Sales, North Region Zone President, Detroit Market President and Boston Market
President. Prior to U.S. Foodservice, Mr. Smith held several positions at food service industry
manufacturer and distributor Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. from 1982 until 1993.

Donald P. McIntyre has served as our Senior Vice President, National Supply Chain and Strategy
since September 2013 and was reappointed as our President of the Western Region in August 2014, a
position previously held from July 2012 to August 2013. Prior to joining us, Mr. McIntyre served as
President and CEO of Claridge Foods from March 2006 to January 2012. Mr. McIntyre also held
several senior positions within subsidiaries of Sara Lee Corporation, including President and CEO of
Sara Lee Coffee & Tea from April 2004 to March 2006, and CFO of Sara Lee Coffee & Tea from
August 2002 to March 2004.

Christopher P. Testa has served as our President, Woodstock Farms Manufacturing since September

2012 and President, Blue Marble Brands since August 2009. Prior to joining us, Mr. Testa served as
Vice President of Marketing for Cadbury Schweppes Americas Beverages from August 2002 to May
2005 and as CEO of Wild Waters, Inc. from May 2005 to August 2009.

Michael P. Zechmeister has served as our Senior Vice President since September 2015. Prior to

joining us, Mr. Zechmeister served in a variety of senior finance roles with General Mills, Inc.,
including most recently as Vice President, Finance Yoplait USA from 2012 to September 2015. In
addition, Mr. Zechmeister was Vice President and Treasurer from 2010 to 2012, Vice President,
Finance US Retail Sales from 2007 to 2010 and Vice President, Finance, Pillsbury Division from 2005
to 2007.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business, financial condition and results of operations are subject to various risks and

uncertainties, including those described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This
section discusses factors that, individually or in the aggregate, we think could cause our actual results to
differ materially from expected and historical results. Our business, financial condition or results of
operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks.

We note these factors for investors as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently,
you should not consider the following to be a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties
applicable to our business. See ‘‘Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations—Forward-Looking Statements.’’

We depend heavily on our principal customers and our success is heavily dependent on our principal
customers’ ability to grow their business.

Whole Foods Market accounted for approximately 35% of our net sales in fiscal 2015. We serve as

the primary distributor of natural, organic and specialty non-perishable products to Whole Foods
Market in all of its regions in the United States under the terms of our distribution agreement which
expires on September 25, 2020. Through our Tony’s subsidiary, we also sell certain specialty protein,
cheese, and deli items to certain Whole Foods Market stores in California and other states in the
Western United States. Whole Foods Market was Tony’s largest customer in fiscal 2015. Our ability to
maintain a close mutually beneficial relationship with Whole Foods Market is an important element to
our continued growth.

The loss or cancellation of business from Whole Foods Market, including from increased
distribution to their own facilities or closures of stores, could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, if Whole Foods Market is not able to
grow its business, including as a result of a reduction in the level of discretionary spending by its
customers or competition from other retailers, our business, financial condition or results of operations
may be materially and adversely affected.

In addition to our dependence on Whole Foods Market, we are also dependent upon sales to our
conventional supermarket customers. Net sales to these customers accounted for approximately 26% of
our total net sales in fiscal 2015, and the recent notification to us by the Albertsons/Safeway group of
stores that they intended to change the source of purchases of natural and organic products from us to
another distributor demonstrated both the importance of this customer group to our results and
operations as well as to the public perception of our business in the investor and analyst community. To
the extent that customers in this group make decisions to utilize alternative sources of products,
whether other distributors or self distribution, our results of operations and stock price may be
materially or adversely affected.

Our operations are sensitive to economic downturns.

The grocery industry is sensitive to national and regional economic conditions and the demand for
the products that we distribute, particularly our specialty products, may be adversely affected from time
to time by economic downturns that impact consumer spending, including discretionary spending.
Future economic conditions such as employment levels, business conditions, housing starts, interest
rates, inflation rates, energy and fuel costs, fund costs and tax rates could reduce consumer spending or
change consumer purchasing habits. Among these changes could be a reduction in the number of
natural and organic products that consumers purchase where there are non-organic, which we refer to
as conventional, alternatives, given that many natural and organic products, and particularly natural and
organic foods, often have higher retail prices than do their conventional counterparts.

Our business is a low margin business and our profit margins may decrease due to consolidation in the
grocery industry and our increased focus on sales to the conventional supermarket channel.

The grocery distribution industry generally is characterized by relatively high volume of sales with
relatively low profit margins. The continuing consolidation of retailers in the natural products industry
and the growth of supernatural chains may reduce our profit margins in the future as more customers
qualify for greater volume discounts, and we experience pricing pressures from suppliers and retailers.
Over the last three fiscal years, when excluding the impact that acquisitions may have had, we have
increased our sales to our supernatural chain and conventional supermarket customers in relation to
our total net sales. Sales to customers within our supernatural chain and conventional supermarket
channels generate a lower gross margin than do sales to our independent customers. Many of these
customers, including our largest customer, have agreements with us that include volume discounts. As
the amounts these customers purchase from us increase, the price that they pay for the products they
purchase is reduced, putting downward pressure on our gross margins on these sales. To compensate
for these lower gross margins, we must reduce the expenses we incur to service these customers. If we
are unable to reduce our expenses as a percentage of net sales, including our expenses related to
servicing this lower gross margin business, our business, financial condition or results of operations
could be adversely impacted.

Our business may be sensitive to inflationary and deflationary pressures.

Many of our sales are at prices that are based on our product cost plus a percentage markup. As a
result, volatile food costs have a direct impact upon our profitability. Prolonged periods of product cost
inflation and periods of rapidly increasing inflation may have a negative impact on our profit margins
and results of operations to the extent that we are unable to pass on all or a portion of such product
cost increases to our customers. In addition, product cost inflation may negatively impact the consumer
discretionary spending trends of our customers’ customers, which could adversely affect our sales.
Conversely, because many of our sales are at prices that are based upon product cost plus a percentage
markup, our profit levels may be negatively impacted during periods of product cost deflation even
though our gross profit as a percentage of net sales may remain relatively constant. To compensate for
lower gross margins, we, in turn, must reduce expenses that we incur to service our customers. If we
are unable to reduce our expenses as a percentage of net sales, our business, financial condition or
results of operations could be adversely impacted.

Our customers generally are not obligated to continue purchasing products from us and larger
customers that do have multiyear contracts with us may terminate these contracts early in certain
situations or choose not to renew or extend the contract at its expiration.

Many of our customers buy from us under purchase orders, and we generally do not have

agreements with or commitments from these customers for the purchase of products. We cannot assure
you that these customers will maintain or increase their sales volumes or orders for the products
supplied by us or that we will be able to maintain or add to our existing customer base. Decreases in
our volumes or orders for products supplied by us for these customers with whom we do not have a
long-term contract may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations.

We may have contracts with certain of our customers (as is the case with many of our conventional

supermarket customers) that obligate the customer to buy products from us for a particular period of
time. Even in this case, the contracts may not require the customer to purchase a minimum amount of
products from us or the contracts may afford the customer better pricing in the event that the volume
of the customer’s purchases exceeds certain levels. If these customers were to terminate these contracts
prior to their scheduled termination, or if we or the customer elected not to renew or extend the term
of the contract at its expiration, it may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial

condition or results of operations, including additional operational expenses to transition out of the
business or to adjust our staffing levels to account for the reduction in net sales.

We have significant competition from a variety of sources.

We operate in competitive markets and our future success will be largely dependent on our ability

to provide quality products and services at competitive prices. Bidding for contracts or arrangements
with customers, particularly within the supernatural chain and conventional supermarket channels, is
highly competitive and distributors may market their services to a particular customer over a long
period of time before they are invited to bid. Our competition comes from a variety of sources,
including other distributors of natural products as well as specialty grocery and mass market grocery
distributors and retail customers that have their own distribution channels. Mass market grocery
distributors in recent years have increased their emphasis on natural and organic products and are now
competing more directly with us and many conventional supermarket chains have increased
self-distribution of particular items or have increased their purchases of particular items directly from
suppliers. New competitors are also entering our markets as barriers to entry for new competitors are
relatively low. Some of the mass market grocery distributors with whom we compete may have been in
business longer than we have, may have substantially greater financial and other resources than we
have and may be better established in their markets. We cannot assure you that our current or
potential competitors will not provide products or services comparable or superior to those provided by
us or adapt more quickly than we do to evolving industry trends or changing market requirements. It is
also possible that alliances among competitors may develop and rapidly acquire significant market share
or that certain of our customers will increase distribution to their own retail facilities. Increased
competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins, lost business and loss of market
share, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete effectively against current and future

competitors.

Our investment in information technology may not result in the anticipated benefits.

Much of our sales growth is occurring in our lower gross margin supernatural and conventional
supermarket channels. In our attempt to reduce operating expenses and increase operating efficiencies,
we have aggressively invested in the development and implementation of new information technology.
Based on our currently anticipated timeline, we expect to complete the roll-out of our warehouse
management system and transportation management system by the end of fiscal 2018. While we
currently believe this revised timeline will be met, we may not be able to implement these technological
changes in the time frame that we have planned and delays in implementation could negatively impact
our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, the costs to make these changes
may exceed our estimates and will exceed the benefits during the early stages of implementation. Even
if we are able to implement the changes in accordance with our revised plans, and within our current
cost estimates, we may not be able to achieve the expected efficiencies and cost savings from this
investment, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations. Moreover, as we implement information technology enhancements, disruptions in our
business may be created (including disruption with our customers) which may have an adverse effect on
our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Failure by us to develop and operate a reliable technology platform could negatively impact our
business.

Our ability to decrease costs and increase profits, as well as our ability to serve customers most
effectively, depends on the reliability of our technology platform. We use software and other technology

systems, among other things, to generate and select orders, to load and route trucks and to monitor
and manage our business on a day-to-day basis. Any disruption to these computer systems could
adversely impact our customer service, decrease the volume of our business and result in increased
costs negatively affecting our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We have experienced losses due to the uncollectability of accounts receivable in the past and could
experience increases in such losses in the future if our customers are unable to timely pay their debts to
us.

Certain of our customers have from time to time experienced bankruptcy, insolvency and/or an

inability to pay their debts to us as they come due. If our customers suffer significant financial
difficulty, they may be unable to pay their debts to us timely or at all, which could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations. It is possible that customers may reject their contractual
obligations to us under bankruptcy laws or otherwise. Significant customer bankruptcies could further
adversely affect our revenues and increase our operating expenses by requiring larger provisions for bad
debt. In addition, even when our contracts with these customers are not rejected, if customers are
unable to meet their obligations on a timely basis, it could adversely affect our ability to collect
receivables. Further, we may have to negotiate significant discounts and/or extended financing terms
with these customers in such a situation, each of which could have material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. During periods of economic weakness,
small to medium-sized businesses, like many of our independently owned natural products retailer
customers, may be impacted more severely and more quickly than larger businesses. Similarly, these
smaller businesses may be more likely to be more severely impacted by events outside of their control,
like significant weather events. Consequently, the ability of such businesses to repay their obligations to
us may deteriorate, and in some cases this deterioration may occur quickly, which could adversely
impact our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our acquisition strategy may adversely affect our business.

A portion of our past growth has been achieved through acquisitions of, or mergers with, other
distributors of natural, organic and specialty products. We also continually evaluate opportunities to
acquire other companies. We believe that there are risks related to acquiring companies, including an
inability to successfully identify suitable acquisition candidates or consummate such potential
acquisitions. To the extent that our future growth includes acquisitions, we cannot assure you that we
will not overpay for acquisitions, lose key employees of acquired companies, or fail to achieve potential
synergies or expansion into new markets as a result of our acquisitions. Therefore, future acquisitions,
if any, may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, particularly in periods
immediately following the consummation of those transactions while the operations of the acquired
business are being integrated with our operations. Achieving the benefits of acquisitions depends on
timely, efficient and successful execution of a number of post-acquisition events, including, among other
things:

(cid:129) maintaining the customer and supplier base;

(cid:129) optimizing delivery routes;

(cid:129) coordinating administrative, distribution and finance functions; and

(cid:129) integrating management information systems and personnel.

The integration process could divert the attention of management and any difficulties or problems

encountered in the transition process could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations. In particular, the integration process may temporarily redirect
resources previously focused on reducing product cost and operating expenses, resulting in lower gross

profits in relation to sales. In addition, the process of combining companies could cause the
interruption of, or a loss of momentum and operating profits in, the activities of the respective
businesses, which could have an adverse effect on their combined operations.

In connection with acquisitions of businesses in the future, if any, we may decide to consolidate

the operations of any acquired businesses with our existing operations or make other changes with
respect to the acquired businesses, which could result in special charges or other expenses. Our results
of operations also may be adversely affected by expenses we incur in making acquisitions, by
amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets with definite lives and by additional depreciation
attributable to acquired assets. Any of the businesses we acquire may also have liabilities or adverse
operating issues, including some that we fail to discover before the acquisition, and our indemnity for
such liabilities may also be limited. Additionally, our ability to make any future acquisitions may
depend upon obtaining additional financing. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on
acceptable terms or at all. To the extent that we seek to acquire other businesses in exchange for our
common stock, fluctuations in our stock price could have a material adverse effect on our ability to
complete acquisitions.

Our business strategy of increasing our sales of fresh, perishable items, that we accelerated with our
acquisition of Tony’s, may not produce the results that we expect.

A key element of our current growth strategy is to increase the amount of fresh, perishable
products that we distribute. We believe that the ability to distribute these products that are typically
found in the perimeter of our customers’ stores, in addition to the products we have historically
distributed, will differentiate us from our competitors and increase demand for our products. We
accelerated this strategy with our acquisition of Tony’s. If we are unable to grow this portion of our
business and manage that growth effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations
may be materially and adversely affected.

We may have difficulty managing our growth.

The growth in the size of our business and operations has placed, and is expected to continue to

place, a significant strain on our management. Our future growth may be limited by our inability to
make acquisitions, successfully integrate acquired entities or significant new customers, implement
information systems initiatives, acquire or timely construct new distribution centers or expand our
existing distribution centers, or adequately manage our personnel. Our future growth is limited in part
by the size and location of our distribution centers. As we near maximum utilization of a given facility
or maximize our processing capacity, operations may be constrained and inefficiencies have been and
may be created, which could adversely affect our results of operations unless the facility is expanded,
volume is shifted to another facility or additional processing capacity is added. Conversely, as we add
additional facilities or expand existing operations or facilities, excess capacity may be created. Any
excess capacity may also create inefficiencies and adversely affect our results of operations, including as
a result of incurring additional operating costs for these facilities before demand for products to be
supplied from these facilities rises to a sufficient level. We cannot assure you that we will be able to
successfully expand our existing distribution centers or open new distribution centers in new or existing
markets as needed to accommodate or facilitate growth. Even if we are able to expand our distribution
network, our ability to compete effectively and to manage future growth, if any, will depend on our
ability to continue to implement and improve operational, financial and management information
systems, including our warehouse management systems, on a timely basis and to expand, train, motivate
and manage our work force. We cannot assure you that our existing personnel, systems, procedures and
controls will be adequate to support the future growth of our operations. Our inability to manage our
growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations.

Increased fuel costs may adversely affect our results of operations.

Increased fuel costs may have a negative impact on our results of operations. The high cost of
diesel fuel can increase the price we pay for products as well as the costs we incur to deliver products
to our customers. These factors, in turn, may negatively impact our net sales, margins, operating
expenses and operating results. To manage this risk, we have in the past periodically entered, and may
in the future periodically enter, into heating oil derivative contracts to hedge a portion of our projected
diesel fuel requirements. Heating crude oil prices have a highly correlated relationship to fuel prices,
making these derivatives effective in offsetting changes in the cost of diesel fuel. We are not party to
any commodity swap agreements and, as a result, our exposure to volatility in the price of diesel fuel
has increased relative to our exposure to volatility in prior periods in which we had outstanding heating
oil derivative contracts. We do not enter into fuel hedge contracts for speculative purposes. We have in
the past, and may in the future, periodically enter into forward purchase commitments for a portion of
our projected monthly diesel fuel requirements at fixed prices. As of August 1, 2015, we had forward
diesel fuel commitments totaling approximately $11.3 million and $10.4 million through December 2015
and December 2016, respectively. Our commitments were entered into at prevailing rates throughout
the fiscal year. If fuel prices decrease significantly, these forward purchases may prove ineffective and
result in us paying higher than the then market costs for a portion of our diesel fuel. We also maintain
a fuel surcharge program which allows us to pass some of our higher fuel costs through to our
customers. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to be able to pass a comparable proportion or
any of our higher fuel costs to our customers in the future, which may adversely affect our business,
financial condition or results of operations.

Disruption of our distribution network could adversely affect our business.

Damage or disruption to our distribution capabilities due to weather, natural disaster, fire,

terrorism, pandemic, strikes, the financial and/or operational instability of key suppliers, or other
reasons could impair our ability to distribute our products. To the extent that we are unable, or it is not
financially feasible, to mitigate the likelihood or potential impact of such events, or to manage
effectively such events if they occur, there could be an adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations.

The cost of the capital available to us and any limitations on our ability to access additional capital
may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

In May 2014, we entered into a First Amendment Agreement (the ‘‘Amendment’’) to our amended
and restated revolving credit facility, which increased the maximum borrowings under the amended and
restated revolving credit facility to $600.0 million and extended the maturity date to May 21, 2019. Up
to $550.0 million is available to our U.S. subsidiaries and up to $50.0 million is available to UNFI
Canada. After giving effect to the Amendment, the amended and restated revolving credit facility
provides a one-time option to increase the borrowing base by up to an additional $150.0 million (but in
not less than $10.0 million increments) subject to certain customary conditions and the lenders
committing to provide the increase in funding, and also permits the Company to enter into a real-estate
backed term loan facility which shall not exceed $200.0 million. The borrowings of the US portion of
the amended and restated credit facility, prior to and after giving effect to the Amendment, accrue
interest, at our option, at either (i) a base rate (generally defined as the highest of (x) the Bank of
America Business Capital prime rate, (y) the average overnight federal funds effective rate plus
one-half percent (0.50%) per annum and (z) one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (‘‘LIBOR’’)
plus one percent (1%) per annum) plus an initial margin of 0.50%, or (ii) the LIBOR for one, two,
three or six months or, if approved by all affected lenders, nine months plus an initial margin of 1.50%.
The borrowings on the Canadian portion of the credit facility for Canadian swing-line loans, Canadian
overadvance loans or Canadian protective advances accrue interest, at the Company’s option, at either

(i) a prime rate (generally defined as the highest of (x) 0.50% over 30-day Reuters Canadian Deposit
Offering Rate for bankers’ acceptances, (y) the prime rate of Bank of America, N.A.’s Canada branch,
and (z) a bankers’ acceptance equivalent rate for a one month interest period plus 1.00%) plus an
initial margin of 0.50%, or (ii) a bankers’ acceptance equivalent rate of the rate of interest per annum
equal to the annual rates applicable to Canadian Dollar bankers’ acceptances on the ‘‘CDOR Page’’ of
Reuter Monitor Money Rates Service, plus five basis points (the ‘‘CDOR rate’’), and an initial margin
of 1.50%. All other borrowings on the Canadian portion of the amended and restated credit facility,
prior to and after giving effect to the Amendment, must exclusively accrue interest under the CDOR
rate plus the applicable margin. The amended and restated revolving credit facility includes an annual
commitment fee in the amount of 0.30% if the average daily balance of amounts actually used (other
than swing-line loans) is less than 40% of the aggregate commitments, or 0.25% if such average daily
balance is 40% or more of the aggregate commitments.

As of August 1, 2015, our borrowing base, based on accounts receivable and inventory levels and
described more completely below under ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Revenues,’’ was $581.4 million, with remaining
availability of $180.6 million.

In August 2014, we and our Albert’s subsidiary entered into a $150.0 million Term Loan

Agreement (the ‘‘Term Loan Agreement’’), with the financial institutions that are parties thereto and
Bank of America, N.A., as the administrative agent. The Term Loan Agreement requires us to make
quarterly principal payments of $2.5 million commencing on November 1, 2014, with the remaining
principal balance to be paid at maturity. The Term Loan Agreement terminates on the earlier of
(a) August 14, 2022 and (b) the date that is ninety days prior to the termination date of our amended
and restated revolving credit facility. The term loan facility is secured by certain parcels of our and
certain of our subsidiaries’ real property. Additionally, the Term Loan Agreement is guaranteed by
most of our subsidiaries. The borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement accrue interest, at our
option, at either (i) a base rate (generally defined as the highest of (x) the Bank of America’s prime
rate, (y) the average overnight federal funds effective rate plus one-half percent (0.50%) per annum
and (z) one-month LIBOR plus one percent (1%) per annum) plus a margin of 1.50%, or (ii) the
LIBOR for one, two, three or six months or, if approved by all affected lenders, nine months plus a
margin of 2.50%.

In an effort to maximize our profit margins, we rely on strategic investment buying initiatives, such
as discounted bulk purchases, which require spending significant amounts of working capital up front to
purchase products that we will sell over a multi-month time period. In the event that our cost of capital
increases, such as during a period in which we are not in compliance with the fixed charge coverage
ratio covenants under our amended and restated revolving credit facility, or our ability to borrow funds
or raise equity capital is limited, we could suffer reduced profit margins and be unable to grow our
business organically or through acquisitions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition or results of operations.

Our debt agreements contain restrictive covenants that may limit our operating flexibility.

Our debt agreements underlying our amended and restated revolving credit facility and Term Loan

Agreement contain financial covenants and other restrictions that limit our operating flexibility, limit
our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business and make us more vulnerable to
economic downturns and competitive pressures. Our indebtedness could have significant negative
consequences, including:

(cid:129) increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

(cid:129) limiting our ability to obtain additional financing;

(cid:129) limiting our ability to pursue certain acquisitions;

(cid:129) limiting our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business and the industry in

which we compete; and

(cid:129) placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors with less leverage or better

access to capital resources.

In addition, our amended and restated revolving credit facility and the Term Loan Agreement each

require that we comply with various financial tests and impose certain restrictions on us, including
among other things, restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, create liens on assets,
make loans or investments or pay dividends. Failure to comply with these covenants could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our operating results are subject to significant fluctuations.

Our operating results may vary significantly from period to period due to:

(cid:129) demand for our products, including as a result of seasonal fluctuations;

(cid:129) changes in our operating expenses, including fuel and insurance expenses;

(cid:129) management’s ability to execute our business and growth strategies;

(cid:129) changes in customer preferences, including levels of enthusiasm for health, fitness and

environmental issues;

(cid:129) public perception of the benefits of natural and organic products when compared to similar

conventional products;

(cid:129) fluctuation of natural product prices due to competitive pressures;

(cid:129) the addition or loss of significant customers;

(cid:129) personnel changes;

(cid:129) general economic conditions, including inflation;

(cid:129) supply shortages, including a lack of an adequate supply of high-quality livestock or agricultural

products due to poor growing conditions, water shortages, natural disasters or otherwise;

(cid:129) volatility in prices of high-quality livestock or agricultural products resulting from poor growing

conditions, water shortages, natural disasters or otherwise; and

(cid:129) future acquisitions, particularly in periods immediately following the consummation of such

acquisition transactions while the operations of the acquired businesses are being integrated into
our operations.

Due to the foregoing factors, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results

may not necessarily be meaningful and that such comparisons cannot be relied upon as indicators of
future performance.

Conditions beyond our control can interrupt our supplies and increase our product costs.

We offer more than 85,000 high-quality natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food

products, which we purchase from more than 9,000 suppliers. The majority of our suppliers are based
in the United States and Canada, but we also source products from suppliers throughout Europe, Asia,
Central America, South America, Africa and Australia. For the most part, we do not have long-term
contracts with our suppliers committing them to provide products to us. Although our purchasing
volume can provide benefits when dealing with suppliers, suppliers may not provide the products

needed by us in the quantities and at the prices requested. We are also subject to delays caused by
interruption in production and increases in product costs based on conditions outside of our control.
These conditions include work slowdowns, work interruptions, strikes or other job actions by employees
of suppliers, short-term weather conditions or more prolonged climate change, crop conditions, product
recalls, water shortages, transportation interruptions, unavailability of fuel or increases in fuel costs,
competitive demands, raw material shortages and natural disasters or other catastrophic events
(including, but not limited to food-borne illnesses). We have continued to experience higher levels of
manufacturer out-of-stocks causing us to incur higher operating expenses as we moved products around
our distribution facilities as we sought to keep our service level high, and we cannot be sure when this
trend will end or whether it will recur during future years. As the consumer demand for natural and
organic products has increased, certain retailers and other producers have entered the market and
attempted to buy certain raw materials directly, limiting their availability to be used in certain vendor
products. Further, increased frequency or duration of extreme weather conditions could also impair
production capabilities, disrupt our supply chain or impact demand for our products, including the
specialty protein and cheese products sold by Tony’s. For example, weather patterns in recent years
have resulted in lower than normal levels of precipitation in key agricultural states such as California,
impacting the price of water and corresponding prices of food products grown in states facing drought
conditions. The impact of sustained droughts are uncertain and could result in volatile input costs.
Input costs could increase at any point in time for a large portion of the products that we sell for a
prolonged period. Our inability to obtain adequate products as a result of any of the foregoing factors
or otherwise could mean that we could not fulfill our obligations to customers, and customers may turn
to other distributors. In that case, our financial condition, results of operations and business could be
adversely affected.

We are subject to significant governmental regulation.

Our business is highly regulated at the federal, state and local levels and our products and

distribution operations require various licenses, permits and approvals. In particular:

(cid:129) the products that we distribute in the United States are subject to inspection by the FDA;

(cid:129) our warehouse and distribution centers are subject to inspection by the USDA and state health

authorities; and

(cid:129) the United States Department of Transportation and the United States Federal Highway

Administration regulate our United States trucking operations.

Our Canadian operations are similarly subject to extensive regulation, including the English and

French dual labeling requirements applicable to products that we distribute in Canada. The loss or
revocation of any existing licenses, permits or approvals or the failure to obtain any additional licenses,
permits or approvals in new jurisdictions where we intend to do business could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, as a distributor and
manufacturer of natural, organic, and specialty foods, we are subject to increasing governmental
scrutiny of and public awareness regarding food safety and the sale, packaging and marketing of natural
and organic products. Compliance with these laws may impose a significant burden on our operations.
If we were to manufacture or distribute foods that are or are perceived to be contaminated, any
resulting product recalls could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations. Additionally, concern over climate change, including the impact of global warming, has led
to significant United States and international legislative and regulatory efforts to limit greenhouse gas
emissions. Increased regulation regarding greenhouse gas emissions, especially diesel engine emissions,
could impose substantial costs on us. These costs include an increase in the cost of the fuel and other
energy we purchase and capital costs associated with updating or replacing our vehicles prematurely.
Until the timing, scope and extent of such regulation becomes known, we cannot predict its effect on

our results of operations. It is reasonably possible, however, that it could impose material costs on us
which we may be unable to pass on to our customers.

If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations or encounter disagreements with respect

to our contracts subject to governmental regulations, including those referred to above, we may be
subject to investigations, criminal sanctions or civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, prohibitions
on exporting, seizures or debarments from contracting with the government. The cost of compliance or
the consequences of non-compliance, including debarments, could have a material adverse effect on our
business and results of operations. In addition, governmental units may make changes in the regulatory
frameworks within which we operate that may require either the corporation as a whole or individual
businesses to incur substantial increases in costs in order to comply with such laws and regulations.

Product liability claims could have an adverse effect on our business.

We face an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims if the products we manufacture or
sell cause injury or illness. In addition, meat, seafood and poultry products that we distribute could be
subject to recall because they are, or are alleged to be, contaminated, spoiled or inappropriately
labeled. Our meat and poultry products may be subject to contamination by disease-producing
organisms, or pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella and generic E.coli. These
pathogens are generally found in the environment, and as a result, there is a risk that they, as a result
of food processing, could be present in our meat and poultry products. These pathogens can also be
introduced as a result of improper handling at the consumer level. These risks may be controlled,
although not eliminated, by adherence to good manufacturing practices and finished product testing.
We have little, if any, control over proper handling before we receive the product or once the product
has been shipped to our customers. We may be subject to liability, which could be substantial, because
of actual or alleged contamination in products manufactured or sold by us, including products sold by
companies before we acquired them. We have, and the companies we have acquired have had, liability
insurance with respect to product liability claims. This insurance may not continue to be available at a
reasonable cost or at all, and may not be adequate to cover product liability claims against us or
against companies we have acquired. We generally seek contractual indemnification from
manufacturers, but any such indemnification is limited, as a practical matter, to the creditworthiness of
the indemnifying party. If we or any of our acquired companies do not have adequate insurance or
contractual indemnification available, product liability claims and costs associated with product recalls,
including a loss of business, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operations.

A cybersecurity incident and other technology disruptions could negatively impact our business and our
relationships with customers.

We use computers in substantially all aspects of our business operations. We also use mobile
devices, social networking and other online activities to connect with our employees, suppliers, business
partners and our customers. Such uses give rise to cybersecurity risks, including security breach,
espionage, system disruption, theft and inadvertent release of information. Our business involves the
storage and transmission of numerous classes of sensitive and/or confidential information and
intellectual property, including customers’ and suppliers’ personal information, private information
about employees, and financial and strategic information about the Company and its business partners.
Further, as we pursue our strategy to grow through acquisitions and to pursue new initiatives that
improve our operations and cost structure, we are also expanding and improving our information
technologies, resulting in a larger technological presence and corresponding exposure to cybersecurity
risk. If we fail to assess and identify cybersecurity risks associated with acquisitions and new initiatives,
we may become increasingly vulnerable to such risks. Additionally, while we have implemented
measures to prevent security breaches and cyber incidents, our preventative measures and incident

response efforts may not be entirely effective. The theft, destruction, loss, misappropriation, or release
of sensitive and/or confidential information or intellectual property, or interference with our
information technology systems or the technology systems of third parties on which we rely, could result
in business disruption, negative publicity, brand damage, violation of privacy laws, loss of customers,
potential liability and competitive disadvantage.

We are dependent on a number of key executives.

Management of our business is substantially dependent upon the services of certain key

management employees. Loss of the services of any officers or any other key management employee
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Union-organizing activities could cause labor relations difficulties.

As of August 1, 2015 we had approximately 8,700 full and part-time employees, 428 of whom
(approximately 4.9%) are covered by collective bargaining agreements at our Edison, New Jersey,
Auburn, Washington, Leicester, Massachusetts, Iowa City, Iowa, and Dayville, Connecticut facilities.
The Edison, New Jersey, Leicester, Massachusetts, Iowa City, Iowa, Auburn, Washington, and Dayville,
Connecticut agreements expire in June 2017, March 2017, June 2017, February 2017, and July 2019,
respectively. We have in the past been the focus of union-organizing efforts, and we believe it is likely
that we will be the focus of similar efforts in the future.

As we increase our employee base and broaden our distribution operations to new geographic
markets, our increased visibility could result in increased or expanded union-organizing efforts. In the
event we are unable to negotiate contract renewals with our union associates, we could be subject to
work stoppages. In that event, it would be necessary for us to hire replacement workers to continue to
meet our obligations to our customers. The costs to hire replacement workers and employ effective
security measures could negatively impact the profitability of the facility, and depending on the length
of time that we are required to employ replacement workers and security measures these costs could be
significant and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations.

In November 2014, the National Labor Relations Board certified the election results of our drivers

in Moreno Valley, California to be represented by the Teamsters Local 63. Management has appealed
those results to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on the grounds that the election was not held within
an appropriate unit of bargaining. During the pendency of the appeal, we could be subject to work
stoppages which could cause us difficulties in meeting all our obligations to our customers, as well as
result in our need to hire temporary drivers and enhance our security measures, all of which could
negatively impact the profitability of the Moreno Valley facility and any of our other facilities that are
impacted by these events.

We may fail to establish sufficient insurance reserves and adequately estimate for future workers’
compensation and automobile liabilities.

We are primarily self-insured for workers’ compensation and automobile liability insurance. We
believe that our workers’ compensation and automobile insurance coverage is customary for businesses
of our size and type. However, there are types of losses we may incur that cannot be insured against or
that we believe are not commercially reasonable to insure. These losses, should they occur, could have
a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition,
the cost of workers’ compensation insurance and automobile insurance fluctuates based upon our
historical trends, market conditions and availability.

Any projection of losses concerning workers’ compensation and automobile insurance is subject to

a considerable degree of variability. Among the causes of this variability are unpredictable external

factors affecting litigation trends, benefit level changes and claim settlement patterns. If actual losses
incurred are greater than those anticipated, our reserves may be insufficient and additional costs could
be recorded in our consolidated financial statements. If we suffer a substantial loss that is not covered
by our self-insurance reserves, the loss and attendant expenses could harm our business and operating
results. We have purchased stop loss coverage from third parties, which limits our exposure above the
amounts we have self-insured.

Adverse judgments or settlements resulting from legal proceedings in which we may be involved in the
normal course of our business could reduce our profits or limit our ability to operate our business.

In the normal course of our business, we are involved in various legal proceedings. The outcome

of these proceedings cannot be predicted. If any of these proceedings were to be determined adversely
to us or a settlement involving a payment of a material sum of money were to occur, it could materially
and adversely affect our profits or ability to operate our business. Additionally, we could become the
subject of future claims by third parties, including our employees, our investors, or regulators. Any
significant adverse judgments or settlements would reduce our profits and could limit our ability to
operate our business. Further, we may incur costs related to claims for which we have appropriate
third-party indemnity, but such third parties fail to fulfill their contractual obligations.

The market price for our common stock may be volatile.

At times, there has been significant volatility in the market price of our common stock. In

addition, the market price of our common stock could fluctuate substantially in the future in response
to a number of factors, including the following:

(cid:129) our quarterly operating results or the operating results of other distributors of organic or natural

food and non-food products and of supernatural chains and conventional supermarkets and
other of our customers;

(cid:129) the addition or loss of significant customers;

(cid:129) changes in general conditions in the economy, the financial markets or the organic or natural

food and non-food product distribution industries;

(cid:129) changes in financial estimates or recommendations by stock market analysts regarding us or our

competitors;

(cid:129) announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions;

(cid:129) increases in labor, energy, fuel costs or the costs of food products;

(cid:129) natural disasters, severe weather conditions or other developments affecting us or our

competitors;

(cid:129) publication of research reports about us, the benefits of organic and natural products, or the

organic or natural food and non-food product distribution industries generally;

(cid:129) changes in market valuations of similar companies;

(cid:129) additions or departures of key management personnel;

(cid:129) actions by institutional stockholders; and

(cid:129) speculation in the press or investment community.

In addition, in recent years the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume

fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market prices of securities issued by many

companies for reasons unrelated to their operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may
materially adversely affect our stock price, regardless of our operating results.

A failure of our internal control over financial reporting could materially impact our business or stock
price.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting and in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 we identified a material weakness in our
internal control over financial reporting. Although we have remediated this material weakness and
management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of August 1,
2015, an internal control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the
design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all internal
control systems, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Any
failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting could limit our ability
to report our financial results accurately and timely or to detect and prevent fraud, and could expose us
to litigation or adversely affect the market price of our common stock. See Part II, ‘‘Item 9A. Controls
and Procedures—Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting,’’ of this report
for additional information regarding our internal control over financial report.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

We maintained thirty-one distribution centers at August 1, 2015 which were utilized by our
wholesale division. These facilities, including offsite storage space, consisted of an aggregate of
approximately 7.7 million square feet of storage space, which we believe represents the largest capacity
of any distributor within the United States in the natural, organic and specialty products industry. In
the first and third quarter of fiscal 2015, respectively, we began operations at our new distribution
centers in Hudson Valley, New York and Prescott, Wisconsin. We are also constructing a new
distribution center in Gilroy, California.

Set forth below for each of our distribution centers is its location and the expiration of leases as of

August 1, 2015 for those distribution centers that we do not own.

Location

Atlanta, Georgia* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Auburn, California* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Auburn, Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Aurora, Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Burnaby, British Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Charlotte, North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chesterfield, New Hampshire* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Concord, Ontario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dayville, Connecticut* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Greenwood, Indiana* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hudson Valley, New York* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Iowa City, Iowa* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lancaster, Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leicester, Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Logan Township, New Jersey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Moreno Valley, California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mounds View, Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prescott, Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Racine, Wisconsin* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Richmond, British Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ridgefield, Washington* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ridgefield, Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rocklin, California* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sarasota, Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
St. Laurent, Quebec . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Truckee, California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vernon, California* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
West Sacramento, California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
York, Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Yuba City, California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Lease Expiration

Owned
Owned
August 2019
October 2033
October 2018
September 2019
Owned
December 2021
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
July 2025
April 2016
May 2028
July 2023
November 2015
January 2020
Owned
Owned
August 2022
Owned
September 2017
Owned
July 2017
July 2017
August 2020
Owned
Owned
May 2020
September 2021

The properties noted above are mortgaged under and encumbered by our Term Loan
Agreement entered into on August 14, 2014.

We lease facilities to operate thirteen natural products retail stores through our Earth Origins
division in Florida, Maryland and Massachusetts, each with various lease expiration dates. We also lease
a processing and manufacturing facility in Edison, New Jersey with a lease expiration date of March 31,
2018.

We lease office space in Santa Cruz, California, Chesterfield, New Hampshire, Uniondale, New

York, Richmond, Virginia, and Providence, Rhode Island, the site of our corporate headquarters. Our
leases have been entered into upon terms that we believe to be reasonable and customary.

We lease warehouse facilities in Minneapolis, Minnesota that we acquired in connection with our
acquisition of Roots & Fruits Produce Cooperative in 2005 and West Sacramento, California that we
acquired in connection with our acquisition of Tony’s. Both of these facilities are currently being
subleased under an agreement that expires concurrently with our lease termination in November 2016

and April 2018, respectively. We also lease offsite storage space near certain of our distribution
facilities.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we are involved in routine litigation that arises in the ordinary course of our

business. There are no pending material legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which our
property is subject.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER

MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market(cid:4) under the symbol ‘‘UNFI.’’

Our common stock began trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market(cid:4) on November 1, 1996.

The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods indicated, the high and low sale prices per

share of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market(cid:4):

Fiscal 2015

High

Low

First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$69.51
80.77
83.91
69.26

$58.48
67.71
66.34
45.26

Fiscal 2014

$75.85
76.85
79.64
69.85

$58.29
66.74
64.12
58.04

On August 1, 2015, we had 88 stockholders of record. The number of record holders may not be
representative of the number of beneficial holders of our common stock because depositories, brokers
or other nominees hold many shares.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We anticipate that all of

our earnings in the foreseeable future will be retained to finance the continued growth and
development of our business, and we have no current intention to pay cash dividends. Our future
dividend policy will depend on our earnings, capital requirements and financial condition, requirements
of the financing agreements to which we are then a party and other factors considered relevant by our
Board of Directors. Additionally, the terms of our existing revolving credit facility restrict us from
making any cash dividends unless certain conditions and financial tests are met.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 the UNFI Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the ‘‘ESOP’’)
acquired shares of the Company’s common stock on the open market in connection with the ESOP’s
final allocation and release of shares under the ESOP. The following table provides information relating
to the ESOP’s purchase of those shares:

Period

(a) Total Number
of Shares
Purchased(1)

(b) Average Price
Paid per Share

(d) Maximum Number
(or Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs(2)

May 3, 2015—June 6, 2015 . . .
June 7, 2015—July 4, 2015 . . .
July 5, 2015—August 1, 2015 .

—
455
8,938

—
$62.86
$55.76

—
—
—

N/A
N/A
N/A

(1) All purchases were made through open market transactions.

(2) The ESOP made its final allocation and release of shares of the Company’s common stock prior to

the end of fiscal 2015 and no future purchases of the Company’s common stock under the ESOP
are expected.

Except as described in the table above, no shares of the Company’s common stock were

repurchased in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015.

Comparative Stock Performance

The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock for the
last five fiscal years with the cumulative total return on (i) an index of Food Service Distributors and
Grocery Wholesalers and (ii) The NASDAQ Composite Index. The comparison assumes the investment
of $100 on July 31, 2010 in our common stock and in each of the indices and, in each case, assumes
reinvestment of all dividends. The stock price performance shown below is not necessarily indicative of
future performance.

The index of Food Distributors and Wholesalers includes SuperValu, Inc. and SYSCO

Corporation.

This performance graph shall not be deemed ‘‘soliciting material’’ or be deemed to be ‘‘filed’’ for

purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section
and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘Securities Act’’), or the Exchange Act.

COMPARISION OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among United Natural Foods, Inc., the NASDAQ Composite Index,
and Index of Food Distributors and Wholesalers

$250

$200

$150

$100

$50

$0
07/31/10

07/30/11

07/28/12

08/03/13

08/02/14

08/01/15

United Natural Foods, Inc

NASDAQ Composite

Index of Food Distributors and Wholesalers

13OCT201520020679

$100 invested on 7/31/10 in UNFI common stock or 7/31/10 in relevant index, including reinvestment
of dividends. Index calculated on a month-end basis.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected consolidated financial data presented below are derived from our consolidated
financial statements, which have been audited by KPMG LLP, our independent registered public
accounting firm. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any
future period. The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with
and is qualified by reference to ‘‘Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations’’ and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Consolidated Statement of Income Data:(1)

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

August 3,
2013

July 28,
2012

July 30,
2011

Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$8,184,978
6,924,463

(53 weeks)
(In thousands, except per share data)
$6,064,355
5,039,279

$5,236,021
4,320,018

$6,794,447
5,666,802

$4,530,015
3,705,205

1,260,515
1,017,755

1,127,645
916,857

1,025,076
837,953

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring and asset impairment

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

803

Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . .

1,018,558

Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other expense (income):
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total other expense, net . . . . . . . . . . .

241,957

14,498
(356)
(1,954)

12,188

—

916,857

210,788

7,753
(508)
(3,865)

3,380

1,629

839,582

185,494

5,897
(632)
6,113

11,378

174,116
66,262

916,003
755,744

5,101

760,845

155,158

4,734
(715)
356

4,375

150,783
59,441

91,342

1.87

824,810
688,859

6,270

695,129

129,681

5,000
(1,226)
(528)

3,246

126,435
49,762

76,673

1.62

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . .
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . .

229,769
91,035

207,408
81,926

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 138,734

$ 125,482

$ 107,854

Per share data—Basic:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted average basic shares of

2.77

2.53

2.19

common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,021

49,602

49,217

48,766

47,459

Per share data—Diluted:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted average diluted shares of

2.76

2.52

2.18

1.86

1.60

common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,267

49,888

49,509

49,100

47,815

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total long-term debt and capital

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

August 3,
2013

July 28,
2012

July 30,
2011

$1,022,882
2,550,190

$ 854,451
2,288,891

(In thousands)
$ 716,951
1,729,908

$ 612,700
1,493,946

$ 381,071
1,400,988

leases, excluding current portion . . .
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . .

174,780
$1,385,533

32,510
$1,243,364

33,091
$1,099,146

635
$ 978,716

986
$ 869,667

(1) Includes the effect of acquisitions from the date of acquisition.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial

statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. In
some cases you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as ‘‘anticipate,’’ ‘‘believe,’’
‘‘could,’’ ‘‘estimate,’’ ‘‘expect,’’ ‘‘intend,’’ ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘seek,’’ ‘‘should,’’ ‘‘will,’’ and ‘‘would,’’ or
similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss
future expectations, contain projections of future results of operations or of financial positions or state
other ‘‘forward-looking’’ information.

Forward-looking statements involve inherent uncertainty and may ultimately prove to be incorrect

or false. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Except as
otherwise may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking
statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or actual operating
results. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to:

(cid:129) our dependence on principal customers;

(cid:129) our sensitivity to general economic conditions, including the current economic environment;

(cid:129) changes in disposable income levels and consumer spending trends;

(cid:129) our ability to reduce our expenses in amounts sufficient to offset our increased focus on sales to

conventional supermarkets and the shift in our product mix as a result of our acquisition of
Tony’s and the resulting lower gross margins on these sales;

(cid:129) our reliance on the continued growth in sales of natural and organic foods and non-food

products in comparison to conventional products;

(cid:129) our ability to timely and successfully deploy our new warehouse management system throughout

our distribution centers and our transportation management system across our Company;

(cid:129) the addition or loss of significant customers;

(cid:129) volatility in fuel costs;

(cid:129) our ability to successfully consummate our expense reduction efforts in connection with the

previously announced termination of a contractual customer relationship within the expected
timeframe and cost estimates currently contemplated;

(cid:129) our sensitivity to inflationary and deflationary pressures;

(cid:129) the relatively low margins and economic sensitivity of our business;

(cid:129) the potential for disruptions in our supply chain by circumstances beyond our control;

(cid:129) the risk of interruption of supplies due to lack of long-term contracts, severe weather, work

stoppages or otherwise;

(cid:129) consumer demand for natural and organic products outpacing suppliers’ ability to produce these

products;

(cid:129) union-organizing activities that could cause labor relations difficulties and increased costs;

(cid:129) the ability to identify and successfully complete acquisitions of other natural, organic and

specialty food and non-food products distributors;

(cid:129) management’s allocation of capital and the timing of capital expenditures; and

(cid:129) our ability to successfully deploy our operational initiatives to achieve synergies from the

acquisition of Tony’s

This list of risks and uncertainties, however, is only a summary of some of the most important
factors and is not intended to be exhaustive. You should carefully review the risks described under
‘‘Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors,’’ as well as any other cautionary language in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, as the occurrence of any of these events could have an adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.

Overview

We believe we are a leading national distributor based on sales of natural, organic and specialty

foods and non-food products in the United States and Canada and that our thirty-one distribution
centers, representing approximately 7.7 million square feet of warehouse space, provide us with the
largest capacity of any North American-based distributor in the natural, organic and specialty products
industry. We offer more than 85,000 high-quality natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food
products, consisting of national brands, regional brands, private label and master distribution products,
in six product categories: grocery and general merchandise, produce, perishables and frozen foods,
nutritional supplements and sports nutrition, bulk and food service products and personal care items.
We serve more than 40,000 customer locations primarily located across the United States and Canada,
the majority of which can be classified into one of the following categories: independently owned
natural products retailers, which include buying clubs; supernatural chains, which consist solely of
Whole Foods Market; conventional supermarkets, which include mass market chains; and other which
includes foodservice and international customers outside of Canada.

Our operations are comprised of three principal operating divisions. These operating divisions are:

(cid:129) our wholesale division, which includes our broadline natural, organic and specialty distribution

business in the United States, UNFI Canada, which is our natural, organic and specialty
distribution business in Canada, Tony’s which is a leading distributor of a wide variety of
specialty protein, cheese, deli, food service and bakery goods, principally throughout the Western
United States, Albert’s, which is a leading distributor of organically grown produce and
non-produce perishable items within the United States, and Select Nutrition, which distributes
vitamins, minerals and supplements;

(cid:129) our retail division, consisting of Earth Origins, which operates our thirteen natural products

retail stores within the United States; and

(cid:129) our manufacturing division, consisting of Woodstock Farms Manufacturing, which specializes in

the international importation, roasting, packaging and distribution of nuts, dried fruit, seeds, trail
mixes, granola, natural and organic snack items, and confections, and our Blue Marble Brands
product lines.

In recent years, our sales to existing and new customers have increased through the continued

growth of the natural and organic products industry in general, increased market share as a result of
our high quality service and a broader product selection, including specialty products, and the
acquisition of, or merger with, natural and specialty products distributors, the expansion of our existing
distribution centers; the construction of new distribution centers; the introduction of new products and
the development of our own line of natural and organic branded products. Through these efforts, we

believe that we have been able to broaden our geographic penetration, expand our customer base,
enhance and diversify our product selections and increase our market share.

We have been the primary distributor to Whole Foods Market for more than seventeen years. We

have and continue to serve as the primary distributor to Whole Foods Market in all of its regions in
the United States pursuant to a distribution agreement that expires on September 25, 2020. Whole
Foods Market accounted for approximately 35% and 36% of our net sales for the years ended
August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, respectively.

In July 2014, we completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding capital stock of Tony’s, through

our wholly-owned subsidiary, UNFI West for consideration of approximately $202.7 million. With the
completion of the transaction, Tony’s is now a wholly-owned subsidiary and continues to operate as
Tony’s Fine Foods. Founded in 1934 by the Ingoglia family, Tony’s is headquartered in West
Sacramento, California and is a leading distributor of perishable food products, including a wide array
of specialty protein, cheese, deli, food service and bakery goods to retail and specialty grocers, food
service customers and other distribution companies principally located throughout the Western United
States, as well as Alaska and Hawaii. We believe that the acquisition of Tony’s accomplished certain of
our strategic objectives as Tony’s provides us with a platform for expanding both our high-growth
perishable product offerings and our distribution footprint in the Western Region of the United States.

The ability to distribute specialty food items (including ethnic, kosher and gourmet) has

accelerated our expansion into a number of high-growth business markets and allowed us to establish
immediate market share in the fast-growing specialty foods market. We have now integrated specialty
food products and natural and organic specialty non-food products into most of our broadline
distribution centers across the United States and Canada. Due to our expansion into specialty foods,
over the past several years we have been awarded new business with a number of conventional
supermarkets that we previously had not done business with because we did not distribute specialty
products. We believe that distribution of these products enhances our conventional supermarket
business channel and that our complementary product lines continue to present opportunities for cross-
selling.

In June 2011, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with L&R Distributors pursuant to

which we agreed to sell our conventional non-foods and general merchandise lines of business,
including certain inventory related to these product lines. This divestiture was completed in the first
quarter of fiscal 2012, and has allowed us to concentrate on our core business of the distribution of
natural, organic, and specialty foods and non-food products.

To maintain our market leadership and improve our operating efficiencies, we seek to continually:

(cid:129) expand our marketing and customer service programs across regions;

(cid:129) expand our national purchasing opportunities;

(cid:129) offer a broader product selection than our competitors;

(cid:129) offer operational excellence with high service levels and a higher percentage of on-time

deliveries than our competitors;

(cid:129) centralize general and administrative functions to reduce expenses;

(cid:129) consolidate systems applications among physical locations and regions;

(cid:129) increase our investment in people, facilities, equipment and technology;

(cid:129) integrate administrative and accounting functions; and

(cid:129) reduce the geographic overlap between regions.

Our continued growth has allowed us to expand our existing facilities and open new facilities in an

effort to achieve increasing operating efficiencies. We have made significant capital expenditures and
incurred considerable expenses in connection with the opening and expansion of our facilities. At
August 1, 2015, our distribution capacity totaled approximately 7.7 million square feet. In September
2010, we began shipping products from our distribution center in Lancaster, Texas, which serves
customers throughout the Southwestern United States, including Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico,
Arkansas and Louisiana. In May 2013, we began operations at our new 540,000 square foot distribution
center in Aurora, Colorado, replacing our existing two broadline distribution centers, an Albert’s
distribution center and an off-site storage location and also began operations at our new Albert’s
distribution center in Logan, New Jersey. We have progressed in our multi-year expansion plan, which
included new distribution centers in Racine, Wisconsin, Hudson Valley, New York, and Prescott,
Wisconsin, from which we began operations in June 2014, September 2014 and April 2015, respectively,
and we are currently constructing a new distribution center in Gilroy, California, from which we expect
to begin operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2016.

Our net sales consist primarily of sales of natural, organic and specialty products to retailers,
adjusted for customer volume discounts, returns and allowances. Net sales also consist of amounts
charged by us to customers for shipping and handling and fuel surcharges. The principal components of
our cost of sales include the amounts paid to manufacturers and growers for product sold, plus the cost
of transportation necessary to bring the product to our distribution centers, offset by consideration
received from suppliers in connection with the purchase or promotion of the suppliers’ products. Cost
of sales also includes amounts incurred by us at our manufacturing subsidiary, Woodstock Farms
Manufacturing, for inbound transportation costs and for depreciation for manufacturing equipment.
Our gross margin may not be comparable to other similar companies within our industry that may
include all costs related to their distribution network in their costs of sales rather than as operating
expenses. We include purchasing, receiving, selecting and outbound transportation expenses within our
operating expenses rather than in our cost of sales. Total operating expenses include salaries and wages,
employee benefits (including payments under our Employee Stock Ownership Plan), warehousing and
delivery, selling, occupancy, insurance, administrative, share-based compensation, depreciation and
amortization expense. Other expenses (income) include interest on our outstanding indebtedness,
including the financing obligation related to our Aurora, Colorado distribution center, interest income
and miscellaneous income and expenses. Fiscal 2015 other income includes a gain of $4.2 million
associated with a transfer of land at the Company’s Prescott, Wisconsin facility. Fiscal 2014 other
income includes a gain of $4.8 million associated with a non-cash transfer pursuant to which we
acquired the land on which we constructed our Racine, Wisconsin facility. Fiscal year 2013 other
expense also includes a pre-tax charge of $4.9 million in the first quarter related to an agreement to
settle a multi-state unclaimed property audit.

Results of Operations

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, certain income and expense items

expressed as a percentage of net sales:

Fiscal year ended

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

August 3,
2013

Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100.0% 100.0%
84.6% 83.4%

100.0%
83.1%

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15.4% 16.6%

Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring and asset impairment expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12.4% 13.5%
—%

—%

Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12.4% 13.5%

Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.0%

3.1%

Other expense (income):

Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total other expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0.2%
—%
—%

0.1%*

2.8%*
1.1%

1.7%

0.1%
—%
(0.1)%

—%

3.1%
1.2%

1.8%*

16.9%

13.8%
—%

13.8%

3.1%

0.1%
—%
0.1%

0.2%

2.9%
1.1%

1.8%

Total reflects rounding

Fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 compared to fiscal year ended August 2, 2014

Net Sales

Our net sales for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 increased approximately 20.5%, or

$1.39 billion, to a record $8.18 billion from $6.79 billion for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014. Net
sales for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 were negatively impacted by $9.3 million as a result of
additional amounts owed to a customer from an incorrect calculation of contractual obligations to that
customer from fiscal 2009 through fiscal 2014. The year-over-year increase in net sales was primarily
due to growth in our wholesale segment of $1.39 billion. We experienced organic growth (sales growth
excluding the impact of acquisitions) of 7.9% over the prior fiscal year due to the continued growth of
the natural and organic products industry in general, increased market share as a result of our focus on
service and value added services, and a broader selection of products, including specialty foods. Net
sales for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 was favorably impacted by the acquisition of Tony’s which
contributed approximately $882.8 million of net sales as compared to $45.3 million for the fiscal year
ended August 2, 2014, as Tony’s was acquired during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. Our net sales for
the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 were also favorably impacted by moderate price inflation of
approximately 2% during the year.

Our net sales by customer type for the fiscal years ended August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014 were

as follows (in millions):

Customer Type

2015
Net Sales

% of Total
Net Sales

2014
Net Sales

% of Total
Net Sales

Independently owned natural products

retailers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Supernatural chains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Conventional supermarkets . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,650
2,822
2,132
581

32% $2,223
2,422
35%*
1,755
26%
394
7%

33%
36%
26%
5%*

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$8,185

100% $6,794

100%

Total reflects rounding

Net sales to our independent retailer channel increased by approximately $427 million, or 19.2%

during the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 compared to the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014, and
accounted for 32% and 33% of our total net sales for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively. While
net sales in this channel have increased, they have grown at a slower rate than net sales in our
supernatural and conventional supermarket channels, and therefore represent a lower percentage of
our total net sales compared to the prior year.

Whole Foods Market is our only supernatural chain customer, and net sales to Whole Foods
Market for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 increased by approximately $400 million or 16.5% over
the prior year and accounted for approximately 35% and 36% of our total net sales for the fiscal years
ended August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, respectively. The increase in sales to Whole Foods Market is
primarily due to increases in same-store sales as well as net store openings and net sales to Whole
Foods Market by our Tony’s business.

Net sales to conventional supermarkets for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 increased by
approximately $377 million, or 21.5% from fiscal 2014 and represented approximately 26% of total net
sales in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014. The increase in net sales to conventional supermarkets is due to
continued success in our strategy of seeking to be the sole supplier of natural, organic and specialty
products to our conventional supermarket customers, as well as net sales by our Tony’s business.

Other net sales, which include sales to foodservice and sales from the United States to other
countries, as well as sales through our retail division, manufacturing division, and our branded product
lines, increased by approximately $187 million or 47.5% during the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015
over the prior fiscal year and accounted for approximately 7% of total net sales in fiscal 2015 as
compared to 5% in fiscal 2014. The increase in other net sales is attributable to net sales from our
Tony’s business and expanded sales to our existing foodservice partners.

As we continue to aggressively pursue new customers and expand relationships with existing
customers, we expect net sales for fiscal 2016 to grow over fiscal 2015, although we expect that our net
sales growth in fiscal 2016 will be lower than in fiscal 2015 as we experience the reduction in net sales
that will result from the loss of business from a significant conventional supermarket customer that
notified us in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 that it was terminating its relationship with us in
September 2015. We believe that the integration of our specialty business into our national platform
has allowed us to attract customers that we would not have been able to attract without that business
and will continue to allow us to pursue a broader array of customers as many customers seek a single
source for their natural, organic and specialty products. We also expect that our ability to add products
that Tony’s has historically sold to our selection of products in our other markets will contribute to an
increase in net sales. We believe that our projected net sales growth will come from both sales to new
customers (including as a result of acquisitions) and an increase in the number of products that we sell

to existing customers. We expect that most of this net sales growth will occur in our lower gross margin
supernatural and conventional supermarket channels. Although sales to these customers typically
generate lower gross margins than sales to customers within our independent retailer channel, they also
typically carry a lower average cost to serve than sales to our independent customers. We also believe
that food price inflation similar to the levels experienced in fiscal 2015 will contribute to our projected
net sales growth in fiscal 2016.

Cost of Sales and Gross Profit

Our gross profit increased approximately 11.8%, or $132.9 million, to $1.26 billion for the fiscal
year ended August 1, 2015, from $1.13 billion for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014. Our gross profit
as a percentage of net sales was 15.4% for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 and 16.6% for the
fiscal year ended August 2, 2014. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales in fiscal 2015
is primarily due to the dilution from Tony’s net sales, the adverse impact from the reduction in net
sales attributable to the incorrect calculation of customer contractual obligations disclosed above, the
impact of unfavorable foreign exchange on our Canadian business, a decline in fuel surcharges and a
shift in the mix of sales.

Our gross profits are generally higher on net sales to independently owned retailers and lower on

net sales in the conventional supermarket and the supernatural channels. For the fiscal year ended
August 1, 2015 approximately $777 million of our total net sales growth of $1.39 billion was from
increased net sales in the conventional supermarket and supernatural channels. Approximately 61% of
our total net sales for each of the fiscal years 2015 and 2014 were to the conventional supermarket and
supernatural channels.

We anticipate net sales growth in the conventional supermarket and supernatural channels will
continue to outpace growth in the independent and other channels. We expect that our distribution
relationship with Whole Foods Market as well as our opportunities in the conventional supermarket
channel will continue to generate lower gross profit percentages than our historical rates. We will seek
to fully offset these reductions in gross profit percentages by reducing our operating expenses as a
percent of net sales primarily through improved efficiencies in our supply chain and improvements to
our information technology infrastructure, including our ongoing warehouse management system
platform.

Operating Expenses

Our total operating expenses increased approximately 11.1%, or $101.7 million, to $1.02 billion for
the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015, from $916.9 million for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014. As a
percentage of net sales, total operating expenses decreased to approximately 12.4% for the fiscal year
ended August 1, 2015, from approximately 13.5% for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014.The increase
in total operating expenses for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 was primarily due to an increase in
net sales and the additional costs to service higher sales volume. Total operating expenses for the fiscal
year ended August 1, 2015 included startup costs of approximately $3.0 million related to the our
Hudson Valley, New York, Auburn, California and Prescott, Wisconsin facilities, $0.6 million associated
with the write-off of an intangible asset related to the Company’s Canadian division, which was
acquired in June 2010, a $0.2 million restructuring charge related to the closure of the Company’s Aux
Mille facility located in Quebec, Canada, and approximately $0.3 million in costs related to the
Company’s acquisition of Tony’s, offset in part by a $0.8 million energy grant received related to our
Hudson Valley, New York facility. Operating expenses for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 included
approximately $2.2 million related to the start up of the Company’s Racine, Wisconsin and Hudson
Valley, New York facilities, in addition to approximately $1.5 million of Tony’s acquisition costs.

Total operating expenses for fiscal 2015 include share-based compensation expense of

$14.0 million, compared to $14.6 million in fiscal 2014. Share-based compensation expense for the fiscal
year ended August 2, 2014 includes approximately $1.1 million in expense related to performance
share-based awards granted to our Chief Executive Officer related to certain financial goals for the
year August 2, 2014. No such expense was recorded for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 as the
applicable goals were not attained. Share-based compensation expense also includes an overall benefit
of $1.0 million and $0.1 million for the years ended August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, respectively,
related to performance-based equity compensation arrangements with a 2-year performance-based
vesting component established for members of our executive leadership team. The $1.0 million net
benefit recorded for fiscal 2015 was a result of established metrics not being met for the 2-year
performance period ended August 1, 2015 as compared to a $0.1 million benefit recorded in fiscal 2014
as result of established metrics not being met for the 2-year performance period ended August 2, 2014.
See Note 3 ‘‘Equity Plans’’ to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in ‘‘Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data’’ of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In connection with the termination of our relationship with a significant conventional supermarket

customer in the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we expect to incur approximately $4.0 to $5.0 million in
restructuring expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 principally related to severance costs.

Operating Income

Operating income increased approximately 14.8%, or $31.2 million, to $242.0 million for the fiscal

year ended August 1, 2015, from $210.8 million for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014. As a
percentage of net sales, operating income was 3.0% and 3.1% for the fiscal years ended August 1, 2015
and August 2, 2014, respectively.

Other Expense (Income)

Other expense, net increased $8.8 million to $12.2 million for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015,

from $3.4 million for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014. Interest expense for the fiscal year ended
August 1, 2015 increased to $14.5 million from $7.8 million in the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014.
This increase is primarily due to an increase in borrowings over the prior year and higher average
interest rates as well as $0.9 million of interest expense recorded related to the capital lease for our
Providence, Rhode Island headquarters as the lease agreement was amended during fiscal 2015.
Interest income for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 decreased to $0.4 million from $0.5 million in
the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014. Other income for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 includes a
gain of $4.2 million associated with a transfer of land at the Company’s Prescott, Wisconsin facility.
Other income for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 includes a pre-tax gain of $4.8 million associated
with a non-cash transfer pursuant to which we acquired the land on which we constructed our Racine,
Wisconsin facility.

Provision for Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate was 39.6% and 39.5% for the fiscal years ended August 1, 2015 and

August 2, 2014, respectively. The increase in the effective income tax rate is primarily due to the
reduced tax benefit of our foreign operations partially offset by the benefit for a federal solar tax credit
claimed by the Company in fiscal 2015.

Net Income

Reflecting the factors described in more detail above, net income increased $13.3 million to
$138.7 million, or $2.76 per diluted share, for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015, compared to
$125.5 million, or $2.52 per diluted share for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014.

Fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 compared to fiscal year ended August 3, 2013

Net Sales

Our net sales for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 increased approximately 12.0%, or

$730 million, to $6.79 billion from $6.06 billion for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013. This increase
was primarily due to growth in our wholesale segment of $711.9 million. We experienced organic
growth of 10.2% over the prior fiscal year due to the continued growth of the natural and organic
products industry in general, increased market share as a result of our focus on service and value
added services, and a broader selection of products, including specialty foods. Net sales for the fiscal
year ended August 3, 2013 were benefited by approximately $118.7 million due to an additional week
during the fiscal year compared to fiscal 2014. Net sales for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 were
favorably impacted by the acquisition of Trudeau Foods and Tony’s which contributed approximately
$62.9 million and $45.3 million of net sales, respectively. Our net sales for the fiscal year ended
August 2, 2014 were also favorably impacted by moderate price inflation of approximately 2% during
the year.

Our net sales by customer type for the fiscal years ended August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013 were

as follows (in millions):

Customer Type

2014
Net Sales

% of Total
Net Sales

2013
Net Sales

% of Total
Net Sales

Independently owned natural products

$2,223
2,422
1,755
394

33% $2,040
2,207
36%
1,501
26%
316
5%*

34%
36%
25%
5%

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$6,794

100% $6,064

100%

Total reflects rounding

Net sales to our independent retailer channel increased by approximately $183 million, or 9.0%
during the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 compared to the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013. While
net sales in this channel increased, they grew at a slower rate than net sales in our supernatural and
conventional supermarket channels, and therefore represented a lower percentage of our total net sales
compared to the prior year.

Whole Foods Market is our only supernatural chain customer, and net sales to Whole Foods
Market for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 increased by approximately $215 million or 9.7% over
the prior year and accounted for approximately 36% of our total net sales for each of the fiscal years
ended August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013. The increase in sales to Whole Foods Market was primarily
due to increases in same-store sales as well as sales by our Tony’s subsidiary to Whole Foods Market,
Tony’s largest customer in fiscal 2014.

Net sales to conventional supermarkets for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 increased by
approximately $254 million, or 16.9% from fiscal 2013 and represented approximately 26% of total net
sales in fiscal 2014 compared to 25% in fiscal 2013. The increase in net sales to conventional
supermarkets was due to increased demand for our products, conventional supermarkets expanding the
breadth of products carried in their stores, and additional sales as a result of our acquisition of Trudeau
Foods and Tony’s during fiscal 2014.

Other net sales, which include sales to foodservice and sales from the United States to countries
other than Canada, as well as sales through our retail division, manufacturing division, and our branded
product lines, increased by approximately $78 million or 24.7% during the fiscal year ended August 2,

2014 over the prior fiscal year and accounted for approximately 5% of total net sales in fiscal 2014 and
fiscal 2013. The increase in other net sales was primarily driven by an increase in broadline distribution
sales to foodservice customers.

Cost of Sales and Gross Profit

Our gross profit increased approximately 10.0%, or $102.6 million, to $1.13 billion for the fiscal
year ended August 2, 2014, from $1.03 billion for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013. Our gross profit
as a percentage of net sales was 16.6% for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 and 16.9% for the
fiscal year ended August 3, 2013. The decrease in gross profit was attributed to a combination of severe
weather in the second quarter, the foreign exchange impact of weakness in the Canadian dollar on our
Canadian business and the continued shift in sales growth towards supernatural, national supermarket
and multi-unit independent customers. These challenges were partially offset by improved execution by
the supply chain group, specifically with respect to procurement and inbound logistics.

Our gross profits are generally higher on net sales to independently owned retailers and lower on

net sales in the conventional supermarket and the supernatural channels. For the year fiscal ended
August 2, 2014 approximately $469 million of our total net sales growth of $730 million was from
increased net sales in the conventional supermarket and supernatural channels. Approximately 61% of
our total net sales for each of the fiscal years 2014 and 2013 were to the conventional supermarket and
supernatural channels.

Operating Expenses

Our total operating expenses increased approximately 9.2%, or $77.3 million, to $916.9 million for
the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014, from $839.6 million for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013. The
increase in total operating expenses for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 was primarily due to an
increase in net sales year over year as well as the inclusion of operating expenses attributable to fiscal
2014 acquisitions. Total operating expenses for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 included
approximately $1.4 million and $0.8 million related to the start up of the Company’s Racine, Wisconsin
and Hudson Valley, New York facilities, respectively, in addition to approximately $1.5 million of Tony’s
acquisition costs. Operating expenses for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013 included $6.3 million in
labor action related costs at our Auburn, Washington facility and approximately $1.6 million related to
the termination of a licensing agreement and write-off of the associated intangible asset.

Total operating expenses for fiscal 2014 included share-based compensation expense of

$14.6 million, compared to $15.1 million in fiscal 2013. Share-based compensation expense for the fiscal
years ended August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013 included approximately $1.1 million and $1.5 million,
respectively, in expense related to performance share-based awards granted to our Chief Executive
Officer related to certain financial goals for those years ended August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013.
Share-based compensation expense also included an overall benefit of $0.1 million for the year ended
August 2, 2014 and expense of $1.7 million for the year ended August 3, 2013, related to performance-
based equity compensation arrangements with a 2-year performance-based vesting component that was
established for members of our executive leadership team. The $0.1 million net benefit recorded for
fiscal 2014 was a result of established metrics not being met for the 2-year performance period ended
August 2, 2014, offset by expense recorded for the 2-year performance year ended August 1, 2015. See
Note 3 ‘‘Equity Plans’’ to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in ‘‘Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data’’ of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As a percentage of net sales, total operating expenses decreased to approximately 13.5% for the
fiscal year ended August 2, 2014, from approximately 13.8% for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013.
The decrease in total operating expenses as a percentage of net sales was primarily attributable to the
growth in the supernatural and conventional supermarket channels which in general have lower

operating expenses and higher fixed cost coverage due to higher sales, as well as expense control
programs across all of our divisions. Our operating expenses as a percentage of net sales for fiscal 2013
were negatively impacted by $6.3 million in labor action related costs at our Auburn, Washington
facility and approximately $1.6 million related to the termination of a licensing agreement and write-off
of the associated intangible asset. We were able to manage our fuel costs despite rising prices by
locking in the price of a portion of our expected fuel usage, updating and revising existing routes to
reduce miles traveled and optimize use of trailer space, reducing idle times and other similar measures.

Operating Income

Operating income increased approximately 13.6%, or $25.3 million, to $210.8 million for the fiscal

year ended August 2, 2014, from $185.5 million for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013. As a
percentage of net sales, operating income was 3.1% for each of the fiscal years ended August 2, 2014
and August 3, 2013.

Other Expense (Income)

Other expense (income) decreased $8.0 million to $3.4 million for the fiscal year ended August 2,

2014, from $11.4 million for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013. Interest expense for the fiscal year
ended August 2, 2014 increased to $7.8 million from $5.9 million in the fiscal year ended August 3,
2013. This increase was primarily related to a full year of interest expense recorded for our Aurora,
Colorado facility, which we accounted for under the financing method due to our meeting the criteria
for continuing involvement in this sale-leaseback transaction, which increased $1.8 million to
$2.5 million for fiscal 2014 from $0.7 million in fiscal 2013. Interest income for the fiscal year ended
August 2, 2014 decreased to $0.5 million from $0.6 million in the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013.
Other income for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 included a pre-tax gain of $4.8 million
associated with a non-cash transfer pursuant to which we acquired the land on which we constructed
our Racine, Wisconsin facility. Other expense for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013 includes a
pre-tax charge of $4.9 million related to an agreement to settle a multi-state unclaimed property audit.

Provision for Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate was 39.5% and 38.1% for the fiscal years ended August 2, 2014 and

August 3, 2013, respectively. The increase in the effective income tax rate was the result of a net
benefit for the reversal of uncertain tax positions in the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013, and tax
credits associated with a renewable energy project in Moreno Valley, California. This increase was
partially offset by tax benefits associated with anticipated amended state tax return filings to claim prior
year state net operating losses. Our effective income tax rate in both fiscal years was also affected by
increased state taxes resulting from the states in which we operate.

Net Income

Reflecting the factors described in more detail above, net income increased $17.6 million to
$125.5 million, or $2.52 per diluted share, for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014, compared to
$107.9 million, or $2.18 per diluted share for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We finance our day to day operations and growth primarily with cash flows from operations,
borrowings under our amended and restated revolving credit facility, operating leases, a finance lease,
trade payables and bank indebtedness. In addition, from time to time, we may issue equity and debt
securities to finance our operations and acquisitions. We believe that our cash on hand and available
credit through our amended and restated revolving credit facility as discussed below is sufficient for our

operations and planned capital expenditures over the next twelve months. We expect to generate an
average of $75.0 million to $125 million in cash flow from operations per year for the 2016 and 2017
fiscal years. We intend to continue to utilize this cash generated from operations to fund acquisitions,
fund investment in working capital and capital expenditure needs and reduce our debt levels. We
intend to manage capital expenditures to approximately 0.6% to 0.7% of net sales for fiscal 2016,
excluding the impact of any potential sale-leaseback transactions, reflecting a decrease over levels
experienced in fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015. We expect to finance requirements with cash generated from
operations and borrowings under our amended and restated revolving credit facility. Our planned
capital projects in fiscal 2016 will be focused on the completion of our Gilroy, California distribution
facility and continuing the implementation of our information technology projects across the Company
that we believe will provide us with increased efficiency and the capacity to continue to support the
growth of our customer base. Future investments and acquisitions may be financed through equity,
long-term debt or borrowings under our amended and restated revolving credit facility.

In May 2014, we entered into the Amendment to our amended and restated revolving credit

facility, which increased the maximum borrowings under the amended and restated revolving credit
facility to $600 million and extended the maturity date to May 21, 2019. Up to $550.0 million is
available to our U.S. subsidiaries and up to $50.0 million is available to UNFI Canada. After giving
effect to the Amendment, the amended and restated revolving credit facility provides a one-time option
to increase the borrowing base by up to an additional $150 million (but in not less than $10.0 million
increments) subject to certain customary conditions and the lenders committing to provide the increase
in funding, and also permits us to enter into a real-estate backed term loan facility which shall not
exceed $200.0 million. The borrowings of the U.S. portion of the amended and restated credit facility,
prior to and after giving effect to the Amendment, accrue interest, at our option, at either (i) a base
rate (generally defined as the highest of (x) the Bank of America Business Capital prime rate, (y) the
average overnight federal funds effective rate plus one-half percent (0.50%) per annum and
(z) one-month LIBOR plus one percent (1%) per annum) plus an initial margin of 0.50%, or (ii) the
LIBOR for one, two, three or six months or, if approved by all affected lenders, nine months plus an
initial margin of 1.50%. The borrowings on the Canadian portion of the credit facility for Canadian
swing-line loans, Canadian overadvance loans or Canadian protective advances accrue interest, at our
option, at either (i) a prime rate (generally defined as the highest of (x) 0.50% over 30-day Reuters
Canadian Deposit Offering Rate for bankers’ acceptances, (y) the prime rate of Bank of America,
N.A.’s Canada branch, and (z) a bankers’ acceptance equivalent rate for a one month interest period
plus 1.00%) plus an initial margin of 0.50%, or (ii) a bankers’ acceptance equivalent rate of the rate of
interest per annum equal to the annual rates applicable to Canadian Dollar bankers’ acceptances on
the ‘‘CDOR Page’’ of Reuter Monitor Money Rates Service, plus the CDOR rate, and an initial margin
of 1.50%. All other borrowings on the Canadian portion of the amended and restated credit facility,
prior to and after giving effect to the Amendment, must exclusively accrue interest under the CDOR
rate plus the applicable margin. An annual commitment fee in the amount of 0.30% if the average
daily balance of amounts actually used (other than swing-line loans) is less than 40% of the aggregate
commitments, or 0.25% if such average daily balance is 40% or more of the aggregate commitments.

As of August 1, 2015, our borrowing base, based on eligible accounts receivable and inventory

levels, was $581.4 million. As of August 1, 2015, we had $363.0 million outstanding under our credit
facility, $35.2 million in letter of credit commitments and $2.6 million in reserves which generally
reduces our available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility on a dollar for dollar basis.
Our resulting remaining availability was $180.6 million as of August 1, 2015. The revolving credit
facility, as amended and restated, subjects us to a springing minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (as
defined in the underlying credit agreement) of 1.0 to 1.0 calculated at the end of each of our fiscal
quarters on a rolling four quarter basis when aggregate availability (as defined in the underlying credit
agreement) is less than the greater of (i) $35.0 million and (ii) 10% of the aggregate borrowing base.

We were not subject to fixed charge coverage ratio covenants as of the fiscal year ended August 1,
2015.

On August 14, 2014, we entered into a real-estate backed Term Loan Agreement by and among us,

our wholly-owned subsidiary Albert’s, the financial institutions that are parties thereto as lenders
(collectively, the ‘‘Lenders’’), Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent for the Lenders and the
other parties thereto. The total initial borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement were $150.0 million.
We have been required to make $2.5 million principal payments quarterly since November 1, 2014. The
Term Loan Agreement will terminate on the earlier of (a) August 14, 2022 and (b) the date that is
ninety days prior to the termination date of our amended and restated revolving credit facility. Under
the Term Loan Agreement, we at our option may request the establishment of one or more new term
loan commitments in increments of at least $10.0 million, but not to exceed $50.0 million in total,
subject to the approval of the Lenders electing to participate in such incremental loans and the
satisfaction of the conditions required by the Term Loan Agreement. We will be required to make
quarterly principal payments on these incremental borrowings in accordance with the terms of the Term
Loan Agreement. Proceeds from this Term Loan Agreement were used to pay down borrowings on our
amended and restated revolving credit facility.

The Term Loan Agreement includes financial covenants that require (i) the ratio of the Company’s

consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement) minus the unfinanced portion of
Capital Expenditures (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement) to the Company’s consolidated Fixed
Charges (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement) to be at least 1.20 to 1.00 as of the end of any
period of four fiscal quarters, (ii) the ratio of the Company’s Consolidated Funded Debt (as defined in
the Term Loan Agreement) to the Company’s EBITDA for the four fiscal quarters most recently ended
to be not more than 3.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter and (iii) the ratio, expressed as a
percentage, of the Company’s outstanding principal balance under the Loans (as defined in the Term
Loan Agreement), divided by the Mortgaged Property Value (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement)
to be not more than 75% at any time.

On January 23, 2015 we entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement with an
effective date of August 3, 2015, which expires in August 2022 concurrent with the scheduled maturity
of our Term Loan Agreement. This interest rate swap agreement has an initial notional amount of
$140.0 million and provides for us to pay interest for a seven-year period at a fixed rate of 1.795%
while receiving interest for the same period at the one-month LIBOR on the same notional principal
amount. The interest rate swap agreement has an amortizing notional amount which adjusts down on
the dates payments are due on the underlying term loan. The interest rate swap has been entered into
as a hedge against LIBOR movements on $140.0 million of the current variable rate indebtedness
under the Term Loan Agreement at one-month LIBOR plus 1.00% and a margin of 1.50%, thereby
fixing our effective rate on the notional amount at 4.295%. The swap agreement qualifies as an
‘‘effective’’ hedge under Accounting Standards Codification (‘‘ASC’’) 815 Derivatives and Hedging.

Our capital expenditures for the 2015 fiscal year were $129.1 million, compared to $147.3 million
for fiscal 2014, primarily driven by the construction of our new Racine, Wisconsin and Hudson Valley,
New York distribution centers. We believe that our capital requirements for fiscal 2016 will be between
$49 million and $59 million. This does not include any potential proceeds related to a planned sale
leaseback transaction at our Prescott, Wisconsin facility. We expect to finance these requirements with
cash generated from operations, proceeds from a planned sale leaseback and borrowings under our
amended and restated revolving credit facility. Our planned capital projects will provide technology that
we believe will provide us with increased efficiency and the capacity to continue to support the growth
of our customer base. We believe that our capital requirements after fiscal 2016 will be marginally
lower than our anticipated fiscal 2016 requirements, as a percentage of net sales, although we plan to
continue to invest in technology and expand our facilities. Future investments and acquisitions will be

financed through our revolving credit facility, or with the issuance of equity or long-term debt,
negotiated at the time of the potential acquisition.

Net cash provided by operations was $48.9 million for the year ended August 1, 2015, a decrease
of $13.6 million from the $62.4 million provided by operations for the year ended August 2, 2014. The
primary reasons for the net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2015 were net income for the
year of $138.7 million, and depreciation and amortization of $63.8 million offset by an increase in
inventories of $153.7 million in part as a result stocking inventory at new facilities. Net cash provided
by operations of $62.4 million for the year ended August 2, 2014 was impacted by an increase in
inventories of $97.8 million in part as a result of stocking inventory in our Racine, Wisconsin facility as
we began to commence operations, and an increase in accounts receivable of $71.2 million due to our
sales growth during the year, offset by net income of $125.5 million. Days in inventory was 50 days at
August 1, 2015, compared to 51 days at August 2, 2014. Days sales outstanding decreased from 23 at
August 2, 2014 to 22 days at August 1, 2015. Working capital increased by $168.4 million, or 19.7%, to
$1.02 billion at August 1, 2015, compared to working capital of $854.5 million at August 2, 2014,
primarily as a result of the increase in our inventory and accounts receivable balances.

Net cash used in investing activities decreased $210.7 million to $142.1 million for the fiscal year

ended August 1, 2015, compared to $352.8 million for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014. The
decrease from the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 was primarily due to the fact that we did not
complete any acquisitions during fiscal 2015. Net cash used in investing activities of $352.8 million for
the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 was primarily due the acquisitions of Trudeau Foods during the
first quarter of fiscal 2014 and Tony’s in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 as well as an increase in
capital spending associated with our Racine, Wisconsin and Hudson Valley, New York distribution
centers.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $94.4 million for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015.

We present proceeds and borrowings related to the Company’s amended and restated revolving credit
facility on a gross basis. The net cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to gross
borrowings under our amended and restated revolving credit facility and term loan of $728.3 million
and $150.0 million, respectively, partially offset by repayments of our revolving credit line and
long-term debt of $779.5 million and $11.2 million, respectively. Net cash provided by financing
activities was $295.4 million for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 and was primarily due to the
borrowings used to fund capital expenditures and the acquisition of Tony’s in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2014.

We may from time to time enter into commodity swap agreements to reduce price risk associated

with our anticipated purchases of diesel fuel. These commodity swap agreements hedge a portion of
our expected fuel usage for the periods set forth in the agreements. We monitor the commodity
(NYMEX #2 Heating oil) used in our swap agreements to determine that the correlation between the
commodity and diesel fuel is deemed to be ‘‘highly effective.’’ During the fiscal years ended August 1,
2015 and August 2, 2014, we had no outstanding commodity swap agreements.

In addition to the previously discussed interest rate and commodity swap agreements, from
time-to-time we enter into fixed price fuel supply agreements. As of August 1, 2015, we had entered
into agreements which require us to purchase a total of approximately 7.4 million gallons ranging from
$3.20 to $3.92 per gallon through December 2015 and approximately 3.6 million gallons ranging from
$2.59 to $3.18 through December 2016. As of August 2, 2014, we had entered into agreements which
required us to purchase a total of approximately 8.9 million gallons of diesel fuel at prices ranging from
$3.17 to $4.00 per gallon through December 2014. These fixed price fuel agreements qualify for the
‘‘normal purchase’’ exception under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging as physical deliveries will occur
rather than net settlements, therefore the fuel purchases under these contracts are expensed as
incurred and included within operating expenses.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and

judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Securities and Exchange Commission has defined
critical accounting policies as those that are both most important to the portrayal of our financial
condition and results and require our most difficult, complex or subjective judgments or estimates.
Based on this definition, we believe our critical accounting policies are: (i) determining our allowance
for doubtful accounts, (ii) determining our reserves for the self-insured portions of our workers’
compensation and automobile liabilities, (iii) valuing assets and liabilities acquired in business
combinations; and (iv) valuing goodwill and intangible assets. For all financial statement periods
presented, there have been no material modifications to the application of these critical accounting
policies.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

We analyze customer creditworthiness, accounts receivable balances, payment history, payment

terms and historical bad debt levels when evaluating the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful
accounts. In instances where a reserve has been recorded for a particular customer, future sales to the
customer are conducted using either cash-on-delivery terms, or the account is closely monitored so that
as agreed upon payments are received, orders are released; a failure to pay results in held or cancelled
orders. Our accounts receivable balance was $474.5 million and $441.5 million, net of the allowance for
doubtful accounts of $7.5 million and $7.6 million, as of August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014,
respectively. Our notes receivable balances were $7.4 million and $5.9 million, net of the allowance for
doubtful accounts of $1.0 million and $0.7 million, as of August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014,
respectively.

Insurance reserves

We are primarily self-insured for workers’ compensation and general and automobile liability

insurance. It is our policy to record the self-insured portions of our workers’ compensation and
automobile liabilities based upon actuarial methods of estimating the future cost of claims and related
expenses that have been reported but not settled, and that have been incurred but not yet reported.
Any projection of losses concerning workers’ compensation and automobile liability is subject to a
considerable degree of variability. Among the causes of this variability are unpredictable external
factors affecting litigation trends, benefit level changes and claim settlement patterns. If actual claims
incurred are greater than those anticipated, our reserves may be insufficient and additional costs could
be recorded in our consolidated financial statements. Accruals for workers’ compensation and
automobile liabilities totaled $18.7 million and $18.9 million as of August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014,
respectively.

Business Combinations

We account for acquired businesses using the purchase method of accounting which requires that

the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at the date of the acquisition at their respective
estimated fair values. The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value assigned to each
class of assets acquired, as well as the estimated life of each asset, can materially impact the net
income of the periods subsequent to the acquisition through depreciation and amortization, and in
certain instances through impairment charges, if the asset becomes impaired in the future. In
determining the estimated fair value for intangible assets, we typically utilize the income approach,
which discounts the projected future net cash flow using an appropriate discount rate that reflects the
risks associated with such projected future cash flow.

Determining the useful life of an intangible asset also requires judgment, as different types of
intangible assets will have different useful lives and certain assets may even be considered to have
indefinite useful lives. Intangible assets determined to have an indefinite useful life are reassessed
periodically based on the expected use of the asset by us, legal or contractual provisions that may affect
the useful life or renewal or extension of the asset’s contractual life without substantial cost, and the
effects of demand, competition and other economic factors.

Valuation of goodwill and intangible assets

We are required to test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and between annual tests if

events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a
reporting unit below its carrying amount. We have elected to perform our annual tests for indications
of goodwill impairment as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. We test for goodwill
impairment at the reporting unit level, which is at or one level below the operating segment level.
Beginning in fiscal 2012, the first step in our annual assessment of each of our reporting units is a
qualitative assessment as allowed under Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) No. 2011-08,
Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment (‘‘ASU 2011-08’’), unless
we believe it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than the carrying value. In
order to qualify for an exclusion from the quantitative two-step goodwill test, the thresholds used by
the Company for this determination are that a reporting unit must (1) have passed its previous two-step
test with a margin of calculated fair value versus carrying value of at least 20%, (2) have had a
two-step test within the past five years, (3) have had no significant changes to its working capital
structure, (4) have current year income which is at least 85% of prior year amounts, and (5) present no
other factors to be considered as outlined in ASU 2011-08. For reporting units which do not meet this
exclusion, the quantitative goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. The first step, used to
identify potential impairment, involves comparing each reporting unit’s estimated fair value to its
carrying value, including goodwill. Each reporting unit regularly prepares discrete operating forecasts
and uses these forecasts as the basis for the assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis. If
the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not to be
impaired and no further testing is required. If the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, there is
an indication of potential impairment and the second step is performed to measure the amount of
impairment. If required, the second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each
reporting unit for which the first step indicated potential impairment. The implied fair value of
goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the amount of goodwill calculated in a business
combination, by measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in
the first step, over the aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable
intangibles as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair
value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no
impairment. If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value
of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess.

As of August 1, 2015, our annual assessment of each of our reporting units indicated that no
impairment of goodwill existed. Approximately 93.4% of our goodwill is within our wholesale reporting
unit. Total goodwill as of August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014 was $266.6 million and $274.5 million,
respectively.

Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment at least annually as of the first day

of the fourth fiscal quarter and if events occur or circumstances change that would indicate that the
value of the asset may be impaired. In accordance with ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles—Goodwill and
Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (‘‘ASU No. 2012-02’’), we
analyzed several qualitative factors to determine whether it was more likely than not that an indefinite-
lived intangible asset was impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the

quantitative impairment test. Impairment would be measured as the difference between the fair value
of the asset and its carrying value. As of August 1, 2015, our annual assessment of each of our
intangible assets with indefinite lives indicated that no impairment existed, Total indefinite lived
intangible assets as of August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014 were $53.7 million and $53.6 million,
respectively.

Intangible assets with finite lives are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Cash flows expected to be
generated by the related assets are estimated over the asset’s useful life based on updated projections.
If the evaluation indicates that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, the potential
impairment is measured based on a projected discounted cash flow model. During the fiscal year ended
August 1, 2015, an impairment charge of $0.6 million was recognized in connection with the closure of
a Canadian facility. During the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013, an impairment charge of $1.6 million
was recognized in connection with the termination of a long-term licensing agreement and the write-off
of the associated intangible asset. Total finite-lived intangible assets as of August 1, 2015 and August 2,
2014 were $72.2 million and $81.4 million, respectively.

The assessment of the recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets will be impacted if estimated

future cash flows are not achieved.

Commitments and Contingencies

The following schedule summarizes our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of

August 1, 2015:

Payments Due by Period

Total

Less than
One Year

1–3
Years

3–5
Years

Thereafter

(in thousands)

Inventory purchase commitments . . . . . . . . . . .
Diesel fuel purchase commitments . . . . . . . . . .
Notes payable(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company owned life insurance premiums . . . . .
Long-term non-capitalized leases . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 17,495
21,671
362,993
186,393
10,384
11,700
227,212

$ 17,495
17,332
—
11,613
1,360
2,925
51,341

4,339

—
— 362,993
115,143
2,016
2,925
53,023

23,914
2,315
5,850
84,944

—
—
35,723
4,693
—
37,904

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$837,848

$102,066

$121,362

$536,100

$78,320

(1) The notes payable obligations shown reflect the expiration of the credit facility, not necessarily the
underlying individual borrowings. Notes payable does not included outstanding letters of credit of
approximately $35.2 million at August 1, 2015 nor approximately $26.1 million in interest payments
(including unused lines fees) projected to be due in future years (less than 1 year—$6.8 million;
1-3 years—$13.7 million; and 3-5 years—$5.6 million) based on the variable rates in effect at
August 1, 2015. Variable rates, as well as outstanding principal balances, could change in future
periods. See ‘‘Liquidity and Capital Resources’’ above and Note 6 ‘‘Notes Payable’’ to our
Consolidated Financial Statements included in ‘‘Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data’’ of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our credit facility.

(2) Long-term debt does not include interest payments projected to be due in future years related to
our capital lease obligations and real-estate backed Term Loan Agreement, which amount to
approximately $32.4 million and $18.9 million, respectively, (less than 1 year—$9.9 million;
1-3 years—$18.0 million; 3-5 years—$12.3 million; thereafter—$11.1 million). See Note 7
‘‘Long-Term Debt’’ to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in ‘‘Item 8. Financial

Statements and Supplementary Data’’ of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our
long-term debt.

Included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at August 1, 2015 are uncertain tax

positions including potential interest and penalties of $0.5 million that have been taken or are expected
to be taken in various income tax returns. The Company does not know the ultimate resolution of
these uncertain tax positions and as such, does not know the ultimate timing of payments related to
this liability. Accordingly, these amounts are not included in the table above.

Seasonality

Generally, we do not experience any material seasonality. However, our sales and operating results
may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to factors such as changes in our operating expenses,
management’s ability to execute our operating and growth strategies, personnel changes, demand for
natural products, supply shortages and general economic conditions.

Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards

In August 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘‘FASB’’) issued ASU No. 2015-14,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers, (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date deferring the adoption
of previously issued guidance published in May 2014, ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers, (Topic 606). The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity will recognize revenue
to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The
new pronouncement is effective for public companies with annual periods, and interim periods within
those periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, which for the Company will be the first quarter of
the fiscal year ending August 3, 2019. We are in the process of evaluating the impact that this new
guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30)

(‘‘ASU 2015-03’’), which simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs. ASU 2015-03 requires that
debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct
deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with the presentation of debt
discounts. ASU 2015-03 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, which for the Company will be the
first quarter of the fiscal year ending July 29, 2017, with early adoption permitted and retrospective
application required. If the Company had adopted this standard in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, the
result would have been the reclassification of $4.2 million and $3.1 million as of August 1, 2015 and
August 2, 2014, respectively, from deferred financing costs to long-term debt on the Company’s
Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s
Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The new guidance requires management to evaluate whether
there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related
footnote disclosures as appropriate. The new pronouncement is effective for public companies with
annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, which for the Company
will be first quarter of fiscal 2017. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a significant
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 2015)

amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2014, which would be the Company’s first quarter of the fiscal year ended July 30, 2016,
and should be applied on prospective basis. We do not expect the adoption of these provisions to have
a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We are exposed to interest rate fluctuations on our borrowings. As more fully described in Note 8

‘‘Fair Value Measurements’’ to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in ‘‘Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data’’ of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have used interest rate
swap agreements to modify variable rate obligations to fixed rate obligations.

At August 1, 2015, we had long-term floating rate debt under our amended and restated revolving

credit facility of $363.0 million and our real-estate backed Term Loan $140.0 million, and long-term
fixed rate debt of $46.4 million, representing 91.6% and 8.4%, respectively, of our long-term
borrowings. At August 2, 2014, we had long-term floating rate debt under our amended and restated
revolving credit facility of $415.7 million and long-term fixed rate debt of $33.5 million, representing
92.5% and 7.5%, respectively, of our long-term borrowings. Holding other debt levels constant, a 25
basis point decrease in interest rates would change the unrealized fair market value of the fixed rate
debt by approximately $0.7 million and $0.6 million for the fiscal years ended August 1, 2015 and
August 2, 2014, respectively.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements listed below are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

United Natural Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Balance Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page

55
57
58
59
60
61
62

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
United Natural Foods, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of United Natural Foods, Inc. and

subsidiaries (‘‘UNFI’’) as of August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, and the related consolidated
statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended August 1, 2015. We also have audited UNFI’s internal control over
financial reporting as of August 1, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). UNFI’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting

Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement
and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding
of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and
testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable

assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or

detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject
to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of United Natural Foods, Inc. and subsidiaries as of August 1,
2015 and August 2, 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended August 1, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Also in our opinion, United Natural Foods, Inc. maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 1, 2015, based on criteria established in
Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Providence, Rhode Island
September 30, 2015

25JUL201303573253

UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share data)

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $7,489 and $7,589, respectively . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $25,717 and $19,002,

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

17,380
474,494
982,559
32,333
46,976

16,116
441,528
834,722
32,518
45,064

1,553,742
572,452
266,640

1,369,948
483,960
274,548

respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

125,830
31,526

134,989
25,446

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,550,190

$2,288,891

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 390,134
129,113
11,613

$ 377,548
136,959
990

Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt, excluding current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

530,860
362,993
65,644
30,380
174,780

515,497
415,660
50,995
30,865
32,510

Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,164,657

1,045,527

Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 5,000 shares; none issued or

outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 100,000 shares; 50,096 issued and
outstanding shares at August 1, 2015; 49,771 issued and outstanding shares
at August 2, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unallocated shares of Employee Stock Ownership Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

501
420,584
—
(19,443)
983,891

498
402,875
(14)
(5,152)
845,157

Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,385,533

1,243,364

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,550,190

$2,288,891

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)

Fiscal year ended

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

August 3,
2013

Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$8,184,978
6,924,463

$6,794,447
5,666,802

$6,064,355
5,039,279

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,260,515

1,127,645

1,025,076

Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring and asset impairment expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,017,755
803

Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,018,558

916,857
—

916,857

837,953
1,629

839,582

Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

241,957

210,788

185,494

Other expense (income):

Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total other expense, net

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

14,498
(356)
(1,954)

12,188

7,753
(508)
(3,865)

3,380

5,897
(632)
6,113

11,378

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

229,769
91,035

207,408
81,926

174,116
66,262

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 138,734

$ 125,482

$ 107,854

Basic per share data:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted average basic shares of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted per share data:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.77

2.53

2.19

50,021

49,602

49,217

2.76

2.52

2.18

Weighted average diluted shares of common stock . . . . . . . . . . .

50,267

49,888

49,509

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:

Foreign currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in fair value of swap agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal year ended

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

August 3,
2013

$138,734

$125,482

$107,854

$ (13,852) $ (4,060) $ (2,988)
—

(439)

—

Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (14,291) $ (4,060) $ (2,988)

Total comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$124,443

$121,422

$104,866

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

S
E
I
R
A
I
D
I
S
B
U
S
D
N
A

C
N
I

S
D
O
O
F

L
A
R
U
T
A
N
D
E
T
I
N
U

Y
T
I
U
Q
E

’

S
R
E
D
L
O
H
K
C
O
T
S

F
O
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C

d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A

’
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
S

y
t
i
u
q
E

d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R

s
g
n
i
n
r
a
E

e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C

e
m
o
c
n
I

)
s
s
o
L
(

f
o

s
e
r
a
h
S

P
O
S
E

n
i

d
i
a
P

l
a
t
i
p
a
C

l
a
t
o
T

r
e
h
t
O

d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U

l
a
n
o
i
t
i
d
d
A

k
c
o
t
S

y
r
u
s
a
e
r
T

k
c
o
t
S

n
o
m
m
o
C

t
n
u
o
m
A

s
e
r
a
h
S

t
n
u
o
m
A

s
e
r
a
h
S

6
1
7
,
8
7
9

1
2
8
,
1
1
6
$

6
9
8
,
1

)
9
8
(
$

8
9
5
,
4
6
3
$

—

0
9
4
$

1
1
0
,
9
4

0
5

)
2
4
5
,
1
(

2
5
9
,
1

4
0
1
,
5
1

)
8
8
9
,
2
(

4
5
8
,
7
0
1

)
8
8
9
,
2
(

0
5

)
5
4
5
,
1
(

2
5
9
,
1

4
0
1
,
5
1

9
1
3

6
4
1
,
9
9
0
,
1
$

5
7
6
,
9
1
7
$

)
2
9
0
,
1
(

)
9
3
(
$

9
0
1
,
0
8
3
$

—
$

—

3
9
4
$

0
3
3
,
9
4

5
2

4
0
1
,
7

)
2
4
5
,
1
(

1
0
6
,
2

8
0
6
,
4
1

)
0
6
0
,
4
(

2
8
4
,
5
2
1

)
0
6
0
,
4
(

5
2

3
0
1
,
7

)
6
4
5
,
1
(

1
0
6
,
2

8
0
6
,
4
1

2
1
1

9
2
3

4
6
3
,
3
4
2
,
1
$

7
5
1
,
5
4
8
$

)
2
5
1
,
5
(

)
4
1
(
$

5
7
8
,
2
0
4
$

—
$

—

8
9
4
$

1
7
7
,
9
4

4
1

5
8
9

6
4
7
,
2

1
8
9
,
3
1

)
9
3
4
(

)
2
5
8
,
3
1
(

4
3
7
,
8
3
1

)
9
3
4
(

)
2
5
8
,
3
1
(

4
1

2
8
9

6
4
7
,
2

1
8
9
,
3
1

5
2
3

3
3
5
,
5
8
3
,
1
$

1
9
8
,
3
8
9
$

)
3
4
4
,
9
1
(
$

—

4
8
5
,
0
2
4
$

—

1
0
5
$

6
9
0
,
0
5

t
e
n

2
1
0
2

,
8
2

y
l
u
J

t
a

s
e
c
n
a
l
a
B

P
O
S
E

o
t

s
e
r
a
h
s

f
o

n
o
i
t
a
c
o

l
l

,
s
g
n
i
t
s
e
v

k
c
o
t
s

d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r

d
n
a

s
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
e

n
o
i
t
p
o

k
c
o
t
S

)
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
t

n
I
(

s
n
a
l
p

k
c
o
t
s

h
t
i

d
e
t
a
i
c
o
s
s
a

t
i
f
e
n
e
b

x
a
T

n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c

d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
a
h
S

n
o
i
t
a
l
s
n
a
r
t

y
c
n
e
r
r
u
c

n
g
i
e
r
o
F

e
m
o
c
n

t
e
N

3
1
0
2

,
3

t
s
u
g
u
A

t
a

s
e
c
n
a
l
a
B

P
O
S
E

o
t

s
e
r
a
h
s

f
o

n
o
i
t
a
c
o

l
l

n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a

r
o
f

k
c
o
t
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

f
o

e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I

t
e
n

,
s
g
n
i
t
s
e
v

k
c
o
t
s

d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r

d
n
a

s
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
e

n
o
i
t
p
o

k
c
o
t
S

t
e
n

s
n
a
l
p

k
c
o
t
s

h
t
i

d
e
t
a
i
c
o
s
s
a

t
i
f
e
n
e
b

x
a
T

n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c

d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
a
h
S

n
o
i
t
a
l
s
n
a
r
t

y
c
n
e
r
r
u
c

n
g
i
e
r
o
F

e
m
o
c
n

t
e
N

4
1
0
2

,
2

t
s
u
g
u
A

t
a

s
e
c
n
a
l
a
B

P
O
S
E

o
t

s
e
r
a
h
s

f
o

n
o
i
t
a
c
o

l
l

,
s
g
n
i
t
s
e
v

k
c
o
t
s

d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r

d
n
a

s
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
e

n
o
i
t
p
o

k
c
o
t
S

n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c

d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
a
h
S

s
n
a
l
p

k
c
o
t
s

h
t
i

d
e
t
a
i
c
o
s
s
a

t
i
f
e
n
e
b

x
a
T

x
a
t

f
o

t
e
n

,
s
t
n
e
m
e
e
r
g
a

p
a
w
s

f
o

e
u
l
a
v

r
i
a
F

n
o
i
t
a
l
s
n
a
r
t

y
c
n
e
r
r
u
c

n
g
i
e
r
o
F

e
m
o
c
n

t
e
N

5
1
0
2

,
1

t
s
u
g
u
A

t
a

s
e
c
n
a
l
a
B

.
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s

l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f

d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c

o
t

s
e
t
o
n

g
n
i
y
n
a
p
m
o
c
c
a

e
e
S

UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Fiscal year ended

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

August 3,
2013

$ 138,734

$ 125,482

$ 107,854

(In thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating

activities:

Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements . . . . . . . . . . .
(Gain) loss on disposals of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring and asset impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain associated with acquisition of land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of indefinite lived intangibles
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquired companies:

Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of acquired businesses, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment of company owned life insurance premiums . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from disposals of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63,800
15,339
13,981
(2,746)
(499)
803
(2,824)
—
5,059
389

(42,257)
(153,701)
4,541
16,001
(7,756)

48,864

(129,134)
(8,036)
(3,000)
(2,925)
1,026

48,758
881
14,608
(2,601)
647
—
(4,840)
—
3,152
2,012

(71,247)
(97,819)
2,024
28,734
12,627

62,418

(147,303)
(211,574)
—
—
6,084

Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(142,069)

(352,793)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Proceeds from borrowings under revolving credit line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayments of borrowings under revolving credit line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from borrowings of long-term debt
Repayments of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in bank overdraft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment of employee restricted stock tax withholdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements . . . . . . . . . . .
Capitalized debt issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . .
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

728,316
(779,461)
150,000
(11,197)
5,003
3,415
(2,430)
2,746
(1,965)
94,427
42

1,264

16,116

853,884
(568,338)
—
(1,226)
11,501
2,215
(3,757)
2,601
(1,523)
295,357

5,005

11,111

42,398
6,780
15,104
(1,952)
(513)
—
—
1,629
4,227
651

(34,739)
(123,904)
(17,702)
32,418
12,080

44,331

(66,554)
(8,135)
—
—
2,368

(72,321)

610,046
(594,107)
—
(353)
6,347
1,942
(3,484)
1,952
—
22,343

636

(5,011)

16,122

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 17,380

$ 16,116

$ 11,111

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

Non-cash financing activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 14,088

Non-cash investing activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 14,088

Cash paid for interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 14,632

— $ 32,826

7,104

$ 32,826

6,599

5,246

Cash paid for federal and state income taxes, net of refunds . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 72,357

$ 77,091

$ 64,367

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) Nature of Business

United Natural Foods, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the ‘‘Company’’) is a leading distributor and
retailer of natural, organic and specialty products. The Company sells its products primarily throughout
the United States and Canada.

(b) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated
in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s
presentation.

The fiscal year of the Company ends on the Saturday closest to July 31. Fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013

ended on August 1, 2015, August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013, respectively. Fiscal 2015 and 2014
contained 52 weeks and fiscal 2013 contained 53 weeks. Each of the Company’s interim quarters
consisted of 13 weeks except for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013 which contained 14 weeks.

Net sales consists primarily of sales of natural, organic and specialty products to retailers, adjusted
for customer volume discounts, returns and allowances. Net sales also includes amounts charged by the
Company to customers for shipping and handling, and fuel surcharges. The principal components of
cost of sales include the amount paid to manufacturers and growers for product sold, plus the cost of
transportation necessary to bring the product to the Company’s distribution centers, offset by
consideration received from suppliers in connection with the purchase of the suppliers’ products. Cost
of sales also includes amounts incurred by the Company’s manufacturing subsidiary, Woodstock Farms
Manufacturing, for inbound transportation costs and depreciation for manufacturing equipment, offset
by consideration received from suppliers in connection with the purchase or promotion of the suppliers’
products. Operating expenses include salaries and wages, employee benefits (including payments under
the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan), warehousing and delivery, selling, occupancy,
insurance, administrative, share-based compensation and amortization expense. Operating expenses also
include depreciation expense related to the wholesale and retail divisions. Other expense (income)
includes interest on outstanding indebtedness, interest income and miscellaneous income and expenses.
Certain items in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the fiscal years ended August 2, 2014
and August 3, 2013 have been reclassed to conform to a change in the current year presentation of
operating activities. Additionally, certain items in the consolidated balance sheet as of August 2, 2014
have been reclassed to conform with current year presentation. These revisions were not material to
the Company’s consolidated financial statements as a whole.

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or

less.

(d) Inventories and Cost of Sales

Inventories consist primarily of finished goods and are stated at the lower of cost or market, with
cost being determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Allowances received from suppliers
are recorded as reductions in cost of sales upon the sale of the related products.

(e) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.

Equipment under capital leases is stated at the lower of the present value of minimum lease payments
at the inception of the lease or the fair value of the asset. Property and equipment includes the
Company’s non-cash capital expenditures made by the landlord for the Aurora, Colorado distribution
center and related accumulated depreciation. Refer to Note 7, Long-Term Debt, for additional
information regarding this transaction. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment is
computed on a straight-line basis, over the estimated useful lives of the assets or, when applicable, the
life of the lease, whichever is shorter.

Applicable interest charges incurred during the construction of new facilities may be capitalized as

one of the elements of cost and amortized over the assets’ estimated useful lives. The Company
capitalized $0.5 million during the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 related to the construction of new
distribution centers in Prescott, Wisconsin and Gilroy, California. The Company capitalized $0.9 million
of interest during the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 related to the construction of new distribution
centers in Racine, Wisconsin and Hudson Valley, New York. There was no interest capitalized during
the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013.

Property and equipment consisted of the following at August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014:

Original
Estimated
Useful Lives
(Years)

2015

2014

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Warehouse equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Office equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Computer software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Motor vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization . .

Net property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(In thousands, except years)
$ 43,033
302,066
133,120
155,477
57,519
130,652
4,357
63,557

$ 31,324
215,172
130,739
128,121
71,524
97,196
4,520
79,002

20-40
5-20
3-30
3-10
3-7
3-7

889,781
317,329

757,598
273,638

$572,452

$483,960

Depreciation expense amounted to $55.0 million, $42.9 million and $37.6 million for the fiscal

years ended August 1, 2015, August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013, respectively.

(f)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under the asset and

liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

(g) Long-Lived Assets

Management reviews long-lived assets, including definite-lived intangible assets, for indicators of

impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets

may not be recoverable. Cash flows expected to be generated by the related assets are estimated over
the assets’ useful lives based on updated projections. If the evaluation indicates that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable, the potential impairment is measured based on a fair value
discounted cash flow model.

(h) Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business
combination. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. Intangible
assets with definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the following lives:

Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-competition agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trademarks and tradenames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7-20 years
1-10 years
4-10 years

Goodwill is assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the
business combination. The Company is required to test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and
between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce
the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The Company has elected to perform its
annual tests for indications of goodwill impairment as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each
fiscal year.

The Company’s reporting units are at or one level below the operating segment level.

Approximately 93.4% of the Company’s goodwill is within its wholesale reporting unit. In accordance
with Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) No. 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):
Testing Goodwill for Impairment (‘‘ASU 2011-08’’), the Company is allowed to perform a qualitative
assessment for goodwill impairment unless it believes it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s
fair value is less than the carrying value. The thresholds used by the Company for this determination in
fiscal 2015 were for any reporting units that (1) have passed their previous two-step test with a margin
of calculated fair value versus carrying value of at least 20%, (2) have had a two-step test within the
past five years, (3) have had no significant changes to their working capital structure, (4) have current
year income which is at least 85% of prior year amounts, and (5) present no other factors to be
considered as outlined in ASU 2011-08. Based on the qualitative assessment performed for fiscal 2015,
only one of the Company’s four reporting units met these thresholds. As this reporting unit had passed
its previous two-step test within the past 5 years, the reporting unit’s net income has not decreased
more than 15% and its working capital requirements have not increased significantly, no quantitative
testing was performed on this reporting unit as part of the annual test in fiscal 2015.

For the three reporting units that did not meet the thresholds above for fiscal 2015, the Company

performed a two-step goodwill impairment analysis. The first step to identify potential impairment
involves comparing each reporting unit’s estimated fair value to its carrying value, including goodwill.
Each reporting unit regularly prepares discrete operating forecasts and uses these forecasts as the basis
for the assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis which is the basis for the fair value
analysis. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered
not to be impaired and no further testing is required. This was the case for all three reporting units
which required a quantitative test for the annual assessment in fiscal 2015. Had the carrying value
exceeded estimated fair value for any of these three units, there would have been an indication of
potential impairment and the second step would have been performed to measure the amount of
impairment. If required, the second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each
reporting unit for which the first step indicated potential impairment. The implied fair value of
goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the amount of goodwill calculated in a business
combination, by measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in
the first step, over the aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable

intangible assets. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill assigned to
the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit
exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess.

Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment at least annually as of the first day

of the fourth fiscal quarter and if events occur or circumstances change that would indicate that the
value of the asset may be impaired. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value of
the asset and its carrying value.

In accordance with ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing

Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment, the Company is allowed to perform a qualitative
assessment for intangible asset impairment unless it believes it is more likely than not that an intangible
asset’s fair value is less than the carrying value. The thresholds used by the Company for this
determination in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 were for any intangible assets (or groups of assets)
that (1) have passed their previous two-step test with a margin of calculated fair value versus carrying
value of at least 20%, (2) have performed a previous two-step test within the past five years, and
(3) have current year income which is at least 85% of prior year amounts. The Company’s only
indefinite lived intangible assets are the branded product line asset group. During fiscal 2015, the
Company’s annual qualitative assessment of its indefinite lived intangible assets indicated that no
impairment existed.

During fiscal 2015, the Company ceased operations at its Canadian facility located in Scotstown,

Quebec which was acquired in 2010. In connection with this closure, the Company recognized an
impairment of $0.6 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2015 representing the remaining
unamortized value of an intangible asset. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company entered into
an agreement to terminate its licensing agreement with the former owners of an acquired business. In
connection with this termination agreement, during the three months ended October 27, 2012, the
Company recognized an impairment of $1.6 million representing the remaining unamortized balance of
the intangible asset.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and the amount allocated by reportable segment

for the years presented are as follows (in thousands):

Goodwill as of August 3, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill adjustment for prior year business

Wholesale

Other

Total

$184,143

$17,731

$201,874

combinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

73,966

Contingent consideration for prior year business

combinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in foreign exchange rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62
(1,354)

—

—
—

73,966

62
(1,354)

Goodwill as of August 2, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill adjustment from prior year business

combinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in foreign exchange rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$256,817

$17,731

$274,548

(3,487)
(4,421)

—
—

(3,487)
(4,421)

Goodwill as of August 1, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$248,909

$17,731

$266,640

The following table presents the detail of the Company’s other intangible assets (in thousands):

August 1, 2015

August 2, 2014

Gross Carrying Accumulated
Amortization

Amount

Net

Gross Carrying Accumulated
Amortization

Amount

Net

Amortizing intangible assets:
Customer relationships . . . . . . .
Non-compete agreements . . . . . .
Trademarks and tradenames . . . .

Total amortizing intangible assets
Indefinite lived intangible assets:
Trademarks and tradenames . . . .

$ 96,192
1,700
—

$25,364
353
—

$ 70,828
1,347
—

$ 98,928
800
678

$18,901
13
88

$ 80,027
787
590

97,892

25,717

72,175

100,406

19,002

81,404

53,655

—

53,655

53,585

—

53,585

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$151,547

$25,717

$125,830

$153,991

$19,002

$134,989

Amortization expense was $7.8 million, $5.1 million and $4.1 million for the fiscal years ended
August 1, 2015, August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013, respectively. The estimated future amortization
expense for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter on definite lived intangible assets existing
as of August 1, 2015 is shown below:

Fiscal Year:

2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 and thereafter

(In thousands)

$ 6,547
6,238
5,866
5,881
5,420
42,223

$72,175

(i) Revenue Recognition and Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company records revenue upon delivery of products. Revenues are recorded net of applicable
sales discounts and estimated sales returns. Sales incentives provided to customers are accounted for as
reductions in revenue as the related revenue is recorded. The Company’s sales are primarily to
customers located throughout the United States and Canada.

Whole Foods Market, Inc. was the Company’s largest customer in each fiscal year presented.
Whole Foods Market, Inc. accounted for approximately 35% of the Company’s net sales for the fiscal
year ended August 1, 2015 and 36% for each of the fiscal years ended August 2, 2014 and August 3,
2013. There were no other customers that individually generated 10% or more of the Company’s net
sales.

The Company analyzes customer creditworthiness, accounts receivable balances, payment history,

payment terms and historical bad debt levels when evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for
doubtful accounts. In instances where a reserve has been recorded for a particular customer, future
sales to the customer are conducted using either cash-on-delivery terms, or the account is closely
monitored so that as agreed upon payments are received, orders are released; a failure to pay results in
held or cancelled orders.

(j) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents,

accounts receivable, accounts payable and certain accrued expenses approximate fair value due to the
short-term nature of these instruments.

The following estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available

market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Refer to Note 8, Fair Value
Measurements, for additional information regarding the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of notes
payable and long-term debt are based on the instruments’ interest rate, terms, maturity date and
collateral, if any, in comparison to the Company’s incremental borrowing rate for similar financial
instruments. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the
estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the
amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange.

Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities:
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt, including current portion . . . . . . .

(k) Use of Estimates

August 1, 2015

August 2, 2014

Carrying Value

Fair Value

Carrying Value

Fair Value

(In thousands)

$ 17,380
474,494
7,361

$ 16,116
441,528
5,936

390,134
362,993
186,393

390,134
362,993
192,679

377,548
415,660
33,500

377,548
415,660
36,386

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted

in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
amounts reported therein. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results
reported in future periods may be based on amounts that differ from those estimates.

(l) Notes Receivable, Trade

The Company issues trade notes receivable to certain customers under two basic circumstances;

inventory purchases for initial store openings and overdue accounts receivable. Notes issued in
connection with store openings are generally receivable over a period not to exceed thirty-six months.
Notes issued in connection with overdue accounts receivable may extend for periods greater than one
year. All notes are issued at a market interest rate and contain certain guarantees and collateral
assignments in favor of the Company.

(m) Share-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for its share-based compensation in accordance with Financial Accounting

Standards Board (‘‘FASB’’) Accounting Standards Codification (‘‘ASC’’) 718, Stock Compensation
(‘‘ASC 718’’). ASC 718 requires the recognition of the fair value of share-based compensation in net
income. The Company has four share-based employee compensation plans, which are described more
fully in Note 3. Share-based compensation consists of stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted
stock units, performance shares and performance units. Stock options are granted to employees and
directors at exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the Company’s stock at the dates of grant.
Generally, stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units granted to employees vest
ratably over 4 years from the grant date and grants to members of the Company’s Board of Directors
vest ratably over 6 months with one half vesting immediately. The Company’s President and Chief

Executive Officer has been granted performance shares and performance units which have vested, when
and if earned, in accordance with the terms of the related Performance Share and Performance Unit
agreements. During fiscal 2015, fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013, the Company granted performance-based
stock units to its executive officers that will vest if the Company achieves certain performance metrics
as of and for the years ended July 30, 2016, August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, respectively. The
Company recognizes share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service period of the individual grants, which generally equals the vesting period.

ASC 718 also requires that compensation expense be recognized for only the portion of share-
based awards that are expected to vest. Therefore, we apply estimated forfeiture rates that are derived
from historical employee and director termination activity to reduce the amount of compensation
expense recognized. If the actual forfeitures differ from the estimate, additional adjustments to
compensation expense may be required in future periods.

The Company receives an income tax deduction for restricted stock awards and restricted stock
units when they vest and for non-qualified stock options exercised by employees equal to the excess of
the fair market value of its common stock on the vesting or exercise date over the exercised price.
Excess tax benefits (tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of compensation cost
recognized) are presented as a cash inflow provided by financing activities in the accompanying
consolidated statement of cash flows.

(n) Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adding the
dilutive potential common shares to the weighted average number of common shares that were
outstanding during the period. For purposes of the diluted earnings per share calculation, outstanding
stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and performance-based awards, if
applicable, are considered common stock equivalents, using the treasury stock method. A reconciliation
of the weighted average number of shares outstanding used in the computation of the basic and diluted
earnings per share for all periods presented follows:

Basic weighted average shares outstanding . . . . . . . . .
Net effect of dilutive common stock equivalents based
upon the treasury stock method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal year ended

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

August 3,
2013

50,021

(In thousands)
49,602

49,217

246

286

292

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding . . . . . . . .

50,267

49,888

49,509

Potential anti-dilutive share-based payment awards

excluded from the computation above . . . . . . . . . . .

121

(o) Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is reported in accordance with ASU No. 2013-02, and includes net
income and the change in other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) is
comprised of the net change in fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, as
well as foreign currency translation related to the translation of UNFI Canada, Inc. (‘‘UNFI Canada’’)
from the functional currency of Canadian dollars to U.S. dollar reporting currency. For all periods
presented, the Company displays comprehensive income (loss) and its components in the consolidated
statements of comprehensive income.

(p) Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company is exposed to market risks arising from changes in interest rates, fuel costs, and with

the operation of UNFI Canada, foreign currency exchange rates. The Company uses derivatives
principally in the management of interest rate and fuel price exposure. From time to time the Company
may use contracts to hedge transactions in foreign currency. The Company does not utilize derivatives
that contain leverage features. For derivative transactions accounted for as hedges, on the date the
Company enters into the derivative transaction, the exposure is identified. The Company formally
documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its
risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. In this documentation,
the Company specifically identifies the asset, liability, firm commitment, forecasted transaction, or net
investment that has been designated as the hedged item and states how the hedging instrument is
expected to reduce the risks related to the hedged item. The Company measures effectiveness of its
hedging relationships both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis as needed.

(q) Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs

The Company includes shipping and handling fees billed to customers in net sales. Shipping and

handling costs associated with inbound freight are generally recorded in cost of sales, whereas shipping
and handling costs for selecting, quality assurance, and outbound transportation are recorded in
operating expenses. Outbound shipping and handling costs totaled $452.9 million, $397.7 million and
$358.8 million for the fiscal years ended August 1, 2015, August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013,
respectively.

(r) Reserves for Self-Insurance

The Company is primarily self-insured for workers’ compensation, and general and automobile

liability insurance. It is the Company’s policy to record the self-insured portion of workers’
compensation and automobile liabilities based upon actuarial methods to estimate the future cost of
claims and related expenses that have been reported but not settled, and that have been incurred but
not yet reported. Any projection of losses concerning workers’ compensation and automobile liability is
subject to a considerable degree of variability. Among the causes of this variability are unpredictable
external factors affecting litigation trends, benefit level changes and claim settlement patterns.

(s) Operating Lease Expenses

The Company records lease expense via the straight-line method. For leases with step rent
provisions whereby the rental payments increase over the life of the lease, and for leases where the
Company receives rent-free periods, the Company recognizes expense based on a straight-line basis
based on the total minimum lease payments to be made over the expected lease term.

(t) Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers,
(Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (‘‘ASU 2015-14’’) deferring the adoption of previously issued
guidance published in May 2014, ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers,
(Topic 606). The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity will recognize revenue to depict
the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to
which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new
pronouncement is effective for public companies with annual periods, and interim periods within those
periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, which for the Company will be the first quarter of the
fiscal year ended August 3, 2019. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that this new
guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU No. 2015-03, Interest—
Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) (‘‘ASU 2015-03’’), which simplifies the presentation of debt

issuance costs. ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be
presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability,
consistent with the presentation of debt discounts. ASU 2015-03 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
which for the Company will be the first quarter of the fiscal year ending July 29, 2017, with early
adoption permitted and retrospective application required. If the Company had adopted this standard
in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, the result would have been the reclassification of $4.2 million and
$3.1 million as of August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, respectively, from deferred financing costs to
long-term debt on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s
Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The new guidance requires management to evaluate whether
there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related
footnote disclosures as appropriate. The new pronouncement is effective for public companies with
annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, which for the Company
will be the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to
have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 2015)

and Property Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of
Disposals of Components of an entity. The new guidance raises the threshold for disposals that would
qualify as discontinued operations and also requires additional disclosures regarding discontinued
operations, as well as material disposals that do not meet the definition of discontinued operations. The
amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2014, which would be the Company’s first quarter of the fiscal year ended July 30, 2016,
and should be applied on prospective basis. The Company does not expect the adoption of these
provisions to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

(u) Correction of Prior Period Errors

During the three months ended January 31, 2015, the Company recorded a cumulative adjustment

to net sales for $7.7 million related to amounts owed to a customer resulting from an incorrect
calculation of contractual obligations to that customer from fiscal year 2009 through fiscal year 2014.
The aggregate amount of the reduction in net sales related to this incorrect calculation in fiscal 2015
was $9.3 million, including a $1.6 million reduction in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. The Company
reviewed the impact of these corrections in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 99 ‘‘Materiality,’’ and determined that these corrections were not material to
prior or current periods.

2. ACQUISITIONS

Wholesale Segment

Broadline Distribution Acquisitions. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company
finalized its purchase accounting related to the Company’s acquisition of all of the outstanding capital
stock of Tony’s Fine Foods (‘‘Tony’s’’) in the fourth quarter of 2014. Of the total purchase price of
approximately $202.7 million (the ‘‘Purchase Price’’), approximately $196.5 million was paid in cash.
The remaining portion of the Purchase Price was paid with approximately 112,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid for the acquisition and the amounts of

assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date:

(in thousands)
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tradename and other intangible assets .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total purchase price . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Preliminary as of
August 2, 2014

Adjustments in
Current Fiscal
Year

Final
Opening
Balance Sheet

$ 40,307
31,807
42,793
5,815
55,500
26,000
64,644

$266,866
60,698

$206,168

270
—
(810)
—
(700)
900
(3,157)

$(3,497)
—

$(3,497)

$ 40,577
31,807
41,983
5,815
54,800
26,900
61,487

$263,369
60,698

$202,671

The fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired was determined primarily by using
an income approach. Identifiable intangible assets include customer relationships with an estimated fair
value of $54.8 million, the Tony’s tradename with an estimated fair value of approximately
$25.2 million, and non-competition agreements with an estimated fair value of $1.7 million. The
customer relationship intangible asset is currently being amortized on a straight-line basis over an
estimated useful life of approximately 20 years, the non-competition agreements that the Company
received from the owners of Tony’s are being amortized over the 5 year terms of the agreements, and
the Tony’s tradename is estimated to have an indefinite useful life. Significant assumptions utilized in
the income approach were based on certain information and projections, which are not observable in
the market and are thus considered Level 3 measurements as defined by authoritative guidance. The
goodwill of $61.5 million represents the future economic benefits expected to arise that could not be
individually identified and separately recognized, including expansion of the Company’s sales in natural
protein and specialty cheeses.

Acquisition costs related to the Tony’s acquisition were approximately $0.3 million and $1.5 million

for the fiscal years ended August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, respectively, and have been expensed as
incurred and are included within ‘‘Operating Expenses’’ in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The
results of Tony’s operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date
of acquisition. Net sales from the acquired business totaled approximately $882.8 million for the fiscal
year ended August 1, 2015 and $45.3 million for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company, within its wholesale segment, completed a
business combination related to the acquisition of all of the equity interests of Trudeau Foods, LLC
from Trudeau Holdings, LLC, a portfolio company of Arbor Investments II, LP. The total cash
consideration related to this acquisition was approximately $23.0 million. The fair value of the
identifiable intangible assets acquired was determined by using an income approach. The identifiable
intangible assets recorded based on the valuation consist of customer lists of $9.5 million, which are
being amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of approximately ten years.
Significant assumptions utilized in the income approach were based on company-specific information
and projections, which are not observable in the market and are considered Level 3 measurements as
defined by authoritative guidance. The results of the acquired operations have been included in the
Company’s results since September 26, 2013.

3. EQUITY PLANS

The Company recognized total share-based compensation expense of $14.0 million for the fiscal

year ended August 1, 2015, compared to $14.6 million and $15.1 million for the fiscal years ended
August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013, respectively. Share-based compensation expense related to
performance-based share awards, including compensation expense recognized on 2-year long-term
incentive awards granted, for the fiscal years ended August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013, was
$1.0 million and $3.3 million, respectively. The Company recognized a benefit of $1.0 million related to
performance-based share awards for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015 due to the reversal of share-
based compensation expense recorded in fiscal 2014 caused by performance measures not being
attained as of the end of fiscal 2015 and the resulting forfeiture of these awards.

As of August 1, 2015, there was $27.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
outstanding share-based compensation arrangements (including stock options, restricted stock, restricted
stock units and performance-based restricted stock units). This cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.5 years.

For stock options, the fair value of each grant was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-

Scholes option pricing model. Black-Scholes utilizes assumptions related to volatility, the risk-free
interest rate, the dividend yield and expected life. Expected volatilities utilized in the model are based
on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The model incorporates exercise and
post-vesting forfeiture assumptions based on an analysis of historical data. The expected term is derived
from historical information and other factors. The fair value of restricted stock awards, restricted stock
units, and performance share units are determined based on the number of shares or units, as
applicable, granted and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock as of the grant date.

The following summary presents the weighted average assumptions used for stock options granted

in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013:

Fiscal year ended

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

August 3,
2013

Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected term (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

26.2% 28.5% 29.8%
—%
—%
0.3%
1.2%
3.0
3.0

—%
1.4%
4.0

The Company has four equity incentive plans that provide for the issuance of stock options: the

1996 Stock Option Plan (the ‘‘1996 Plan’’), the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the ‘‘2002 Plan’’), the 2004
Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the ‘‘2004 Plan’’), and the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the ‘‘2012
Plan’’) (collectively, the ‘‘Plans’’). The Plans provide, or prior to their expiration provided, for grants of
stock options to employees, officers, directors and others. Since fiscal 2010, the Company has not
granted stock options intended to qualify as incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422
of the Internal Revenue Code. Vesting requirements for awards under the Plans are at the discretion of
the Company’s Board of Directors, or Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Typically,
options granted to employees vest ratably over 4 years. The Company did not grant options to directors
in fiscal 2013, fiscal 2014 or fiscal 2015. The maximum term of all incentive and non-statutory stock
options granted under the Plans is 10 years. There were 9,050,000 shares authorized for grant under
the 1996 Plan, 2002 Plan and 2012 Plan. There were 1,054,267 remaining shares authorized for grant
under the 2004 Plan as of December 16, 2010, the effective date when the 2004 Plan was amended to
allow for the award of stock options. Prior to the expiration of the applicable plan, these shares may be
used to issue stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance based awards. As of

August 1, 2015, 761,493 shares were available for grant under the 2012 Plan. The authorization for new
grants under the 1996 Plan, 2002 Plan and 2004 Plan has expired.

The following summary presents the weighted-average remaining contractual term of options

outstanding at August 1, 2015 by range of exercise prices:

Exercise Price Range

$12.00 - $26.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$26.01 - $40.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$40.01 - $54.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$54.01 - $68.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of
Options
Outstanding

83,730
136,352
5,530
218,904

444,516

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
of Options
Outstanding

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

$24.25
$34.95
$44.95
$63.19

$46.97

3.5
4.6
6.3
8.1

6.1

Number of
Options
Exercisable

83,730
118,645
5,180
45,450

253,005

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
of Options
Exercisable

$24.25
$34.53
$44.47
$61.12

$36.11

The following summary presents information regarding outstanding stock options as of August 1,

2015 and changes during the fiscal year then ended with regard to options under the Plans:

Outstanding at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of
Options

459,074
76,940
(91,498)

Outstanding at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

444,516

Exercisable at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

253,005

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$42.10
$64.55
$37.32

$46.97

$36.11

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

6.1 years

$3,232,768

4.6 years

$3,096,247

The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the fiscal years ended
August 1, 2015, August 2, 2014, and August 3, 2013 was $14.82, $16.48 and $12.21, respectively. The
aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the fiscal years ended August 1, 2015, August 2,
2014, and August 3, 2013, was $3.1 million, $2.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively.

The 2004 Plan was amended during fiscal 2009 to provide for the issuance of up to 2,500,000
equity-based compensation awards, and during fiscal 2011 was further amended to provide for the
issuance of stock options in addition to restricted shares and units, performance shares and units, bonus
shares and stock appreciation rights. Vesting requirements for the awards under the Plans are at the
discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, or the Compensation Committee thereof, and are
typically four equal annual installments for employees and two equal installments for non-employee
directors with the first installment on the date of grant and the second installment on the six month
anniversary of the grant date.

The following summary presents information regarding restricted stock awards, restricted stock
units, performance shares and performance units under the Plans as of August 1, 2015 and changes
during the fiscal year then ended:

Weighted
Average

Number of Grant-Date
Fair Value

Outstanding at August 2, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

640,737
371,569
(259,671)
(131,403)

Outstanding at August 1, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

621,232

$55.77
$64.71
$51.04
$62.82

$61.60

The total intrinsic value of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units vested was

$17.3 million, $16.9 million and $16.7 million during the fiscal years ended August 1, 2015, August 2,
2014 and August 3, 2013, respectively. The total intrinsic value of performance share awards and
performance units vested was $1.3 million and $1.6 million during the fiscal years ended August 2, 2014
and August 3, 2013, respectively. No performance share awards or performance units vested during the
fiscal year ended August 1, 2015.

During the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015, 23,238 performance units were granted, (subject to

the issuance of an additional 23,238 shares if the Company’s performance exceeded specified targeted
levels) to the Company’s President and CEO, the vesting of which was contingent on the attainment of
specific levels of earnings before interest and taxes and return on invested capital. The per share
grant-date fair value of these awards was $64.55. Effective August 1, 2015, all of these performance
units were forfeited as the underlying performance criteria that were required to be achieved in order
for the units to vest were not achieved.

During the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014, 22,229 performance shares were granted (subject to
the issuance of an additional 22,229 shares if the Company’s performance exceeded specified targeted
levels), and no performance units were granted to the Company’s President and CEO, the vesting of
which was contingent on the attainment of specific levels of earnings before interest and taxes and
return on invested capital. The per share grant-date fair value of these awards was $67.48. Effective
August 2, 2014, a total of 19,396 performance shares for fiscal 2014 vested with a corresponding
intrinsic value and fair value of $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The remainder of the
performance shares were forfeited.

During the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013, 25,000 performance shares and 5,123 performance

units were granted (in each case subject to the issuance of an additional 25,000 shares and 5,123 units
if the Company’s performance exceeded specified targeted levels) to the Company’s President and
CEO, the vesting of which was contingent on the attainment of specific levels of earnings before
interest and taxes and return on invested capital. The per share grant-date fair value of these grants
was $52.00. Effective August 3, 2013, an additional 695 units were granted and a total of 30,818
performance shares vested with a corresponding intrinsic value and fair value of $1.6 million and
$1.9 million, respectively.

During the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012, the Company created a performance-based equity
compensation arrangement with a 2-year performance-based vesting component that was established for
members of the Company’s executive leadership team. Under this arrangement, the executives were
awarded performance-based stock units with a grant-date fair value equal to approximately 30% of the
sum of 125% of their annual base salary and 50% of their cash-based performance award earned in the
prior fiscal year. Similar to the performance awards granted to the Company’s President and CEO, if

the Company’s performance exceeded specified targeted levels, the grants could be increased up to an
additional 100%. For the 2-year performance periods ended August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, it was
determined that targeted levels of performance were not met and therefore, the Company did not issue
shares to the executive leadership team in settlement of the performance units and all the units were
forfeited. Effective August 3, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 23,882 shares to the executive
leadership team upon the vesting of an equal number of performance share units based on the final
results of the 2-year performance period ended August 2, 2013.

4. ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE

The allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable consists of the following:

Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions charged to costs and expenses . . . . . . . . . . .
Deductions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Charged to Other Accounts(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal year ended

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

August 3,
2013

$ 8,294
5,059
(4,590)
(270)

(In thousands)
$10,026
3,152
(5,743)
859

$ 6,956
4,227
(1,157)
—

Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 8,493

$ 8,294

$10,026

(1) Relates to acquisitions.

5. RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES

Canadian facility closure

During fiscal 2015, the Company ceased operations at its Canadian facility located in Scotstown,

Impairment of an intangible asset

During fiscal 2007, the Company made several asset acquisitions under its Blue Marble Brands
division, one of which included a licensing agreement under which the Company was permitted to sell
products under the seller’s existing trademark in exchange for royalty payments. The fair value of the
intangible asset at the time of acquisition was $2.1 million, and was being amortized over a life of
27 years, the maximum life of the licensing agreement including renewal periods. In October 2012, the
Company entered into an agreement to terminate its licensing agreement with the former owners. In
connection with this termination agreement, during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 the Company
recognized an impairment of $1.6 million representing the remaining unamortized balance of the
intangible asset.

6. NOTES PAYABLE

In May 2014, the Company entered into a First Amendment Agreement (the ‘‘Amendment’’) to its

amended and restated revolving credit facility, which increased the maximum borrowings under the
amended and restated revolving credit facility to $600 million and extended the maturity date to
May 21, 2019. Up to $550.0 million is available to the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries and up to
$50.0 million is available to UNFI Canada. After giving effect to the Amendment, the amended and

restated revolving credit facility provides a one-time option to increase the borrowing base by up to an
additional $150 million (but in not less than $10.0 million increments) subject to certain customary
conditions and the lenders committing to provide the increase in funding, and also permits the
Company to enter into a real-estate backed term loan facility which shall not exceed $200.0 million.

The borrowings of the US portion of the amended and restated credit facility, prior to and after

giving effect to the Amendment, accrue interest, at the Company’s option, at either (i) a base rate
(generally defined as the highest of (x) the Bank of America Business Capital prime rate, (y) the
average overnight federal funds effective rate plus one-half percent (0.50%) per annum and
(z) one-month London Interbank Offering Rate (‘‘LIBOR’’) plus one percent (1%) per annum) plus an
initial margin of 0.50%, or (ii) the LIBOR for one, two, three or six months or, if approved by all
affected lenders, nine months plus an initial margin of 1.50%. The borrowings on the Canadian portion
of the credit facility for Canadian swing-line loans, Canadian overadvance loans or Canadian protective
advances accrue interest, at the Company’s option, at either (i) a prime rate (generally defined as the
highest of (x) 0.50% over 30-day Reuters Canadian Deposit Offering Rate for bankers’ acceptances,
(y) the prime rate of Bank of America, N.A.’s Canada branch, and (z) a bankers’ acceptance equivalent
rate for a one month interest period plus 1.00%) plus an initial margin of 0.50%, or (ii) a bankers’
acceptance equivalent rate of the rate of interest per annum equal to the annual rates applicable to
Canadian Dollar bankers’ acceptances on the ‘‘CDOR Page’’ of Reuter Monitor Money Rates Service,
plus five basis points (the ‘‘CDOR rate’’), and an initial margin of 1.50%. All other borrowings on the
Canadian portion of the amended and restated credit facility, prior to and after giving effect to the
Amendment, must exclusively accrue interest under the CDOR rate plus the applicable margin. An
annual commitment fee in the amount of 0.30% if the average daily balance of amounts actually used
(other than swing-line loans) is less than 40% of the aggregate commitments, or 0.25% if such average
daily balance is 40% or more of the aggregate commitments.

As of August 1, 2015, the Company’s borrowing base, based on eligible accounts receivable and
inventory levels, was $581.4 million. As of August 1, 2015, the Company had $363.0 million outstanding
under the Company’s credit facility, $35.2 million in letter of credit commitments and $2.6 million in
reserves which generally reduces the Company’s available borrowing capacity under its revolving credit
facility on a dollar for dollar basis. The Company’s resulting remaining availability was $180.6 million as
of August 1, 2015.

The amended and restated revolving credit facility subjects the Company to a springing minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the underlying credit agreement) of 1.0 to 1.0 calculated at
the end of each of its fiscal quarters on a rolling four quarter basis when aggregate availability (as
defined in the underlying credit agreement) is less than the greater of (i) $35.0 million (or $50.0 million
after giving effect to the Amendment) and (ii) 10% of the aggregate borrowing base. Because of the
amount of aggregate availability under the amended and restated revolving credit facility, the Company
was not subject to the fixed charge coverage ratio covenants under the amended and restated revolving
credit facility during the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015.

The credit facility also allows for the lenders thereunder to syndicate the credit facility to other

banks and lending institutions. The Company has pledged the majority of its and its subsidiaries’
accounts receivable and inventory for its obligations under the amended and restated credit facility.

7. LONG-TERM DEBT

On August 14, 2014, the Company entered into a real-estate backed Term Loan Agreement (the

‘‘Term Loan Agreement’’) by and among the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiary Albert’s
Organics, Inc. (together with the Company, the ‘‘Borrowers’’), the financial institutions that are parties
thereto as lenders (collectively, the ‘‘Lenders’’), Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent for the
Lenders (the ‘‘Administrative Agent’’) and the other parties thereto. The total initial borrowings under
the Term Loan Agreement were $150.0 million. Borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement are
guaranteed by most of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Borrowers have been required to
make $2.5 million principal payments quarterly since November 1, 2014. The Term Loan Agreement
will terminate on the earlier of (a) August 14, 2022 and (b) the date that is ninety days prior to the
termination date of the Company’s amended and restated revolving credit agreement, as amended.
Under the Term Loan Agreement, the Borrowers at their option may request the establishment of one
or more new term loan commitments in increments of at least $10.0 million, but not to exceed
$50.0 million in total, subject to the approval of the Lenders electing to participate in such incremental
loans and the satisfaction of the conditions required by the Term Loan Agreement. The Borrowers will
be required to make quarterly principal payments on these incremental borrowings in accordance with
the terms of the Term Loan Agreement.

Borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement bear interest at rates that, at the Company’s option,
can be either: (1) a base rate generally defined as the sum of (i) the highest of (x) the Administrative
Agent’s prime rate, (y) the average overnight federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% and (z) one-month
LIBOR plus one percent (1%) per annum and (ii) a margin of 1.50%; or, (2) a LIBOR rate generally
defined as the sum of (i) LIBOR (as published by Reuters or other commercially available sources) for
one, two, three or six months or, if approved by all affected lenders, nine months (all as selected by the
Company), and (ii) a margin of 2.50%. Interest accrued on borrowings under the Term Loan
Agreement is payable in arrears. Interest accrued on any LIBOR loan is payable on the last day of the
interest period applicable to the loan and, with respect to any LIBOR loan of more than three
(3) months, on the last day of every three (3) months of such interest period. Interest accrued on base
rate loans is payable on the first day of every month. The Company is also required to pay certain
customary fees to the Administrative Agent. The Borrowers’ obligations under the Term Loan
Agreement are secured by certain parcels of the Borrowers’ real property.

The Term Loan Agreement includes financial covenants that require (i) the ratio of the Company’s

During the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015, the Company entered into an amendment to an
existing lease agreement for the office space utilized as the Company’s corporate headquarters in
Providence, Rhode Island. The amendment provides for additional office space to be utilized by the
Company and extends the lease term for an additional 10 years. The lease qualifies for capital lease
treatment pursuant to ASC 840, Leases, and the estimated fair value of the building is recorded on the
balance sheet with the capital lease obligation included in long-term debt. A portion of each lease
payment reduces the amount of the lease obligation, and a portion is recorded as interest expense at an
effective rate of approximately 12.38%.

During the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012, the Company entered into a lease agreement for a new
distribution facility in Aurora, Colorado. As of the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013, actual construction
costs exceeded the construction allowance as defined by the lease agreement, and therefore, the
Company determined it met the criteria for continuing involvement pursuant to ASC 840, Leases, and
applied the financing method to account for this transaction. Under the financing method, the book
value of the distribution facility and related accumulated depreciation remains on the balance sheet.
The construction allowance is recorded as a financing obligation in long-term debt. A portion of each
lease payment will reduce the amount of the financing obligation, and a portion will be recorded as
interest expense at an effective rate of approximately 7.32%.

As of August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, the Company’s long-term debt consisted of the

following:

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

(In thousands)

$ 32,510

$33,439

13,883
140,000

—
—

Financing obligation, due monthly, and maturing in October 2028 at an effective

interest rate of 7.32% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital lease, Providence, Rhode Island corporate headquarters, due monthly, and
maturing in April 2025 at an effective interest rate of 12.38% . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real-estate backed Term Loan Agreement, due quarterly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Term loan for employee stock ownership plan, secured by common stock of the

Company, due monthly and maturing in May 2015, at an interest rate of 1.33%

—

Less: current installments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$186,393
11,613

$33,500
990

Long-term debt, excluding current installments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$174,780

$32,510

Aggregate maturities of long-term debt for the next five years and thereafter are as follows at

August 1, 2015:

Year

(In thousands)

$ 11,613
11,835
12,079
112,386
2,757
35,723

$186,393

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company utilizes ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (‘‘ASC 820’’), for financial

assets and liabilities and for non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value on at least an annual basis. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received from
selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities
required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most
advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants
would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of
nonperformance. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use

of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820
establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

(cid:129) Level 1 Inputs—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

(cid:129) Level 2 Inputs—Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are either directly or
indirectly observable through correlation with market data. These include quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or
liabilities in markets that are not active; and inputs to valuation models or other pricing
methodologies that do not require significant judgment because the inputs used in the model,
such as interest rates and volatility, can be corroborated by readily observable market data.

(cid:129) Level 3 Inputs—One or more significant inputs that are unobservable and supported by little or
no market activity, and that reflect the use of significant management judgment. Level 3 assets
and liabilities include those whose fair value measurements are determined using pricing models,
discounted cash flow methodologies or similar valuation techniques, and significant management
judgment or estimation.

Interest Rate Swap Agreement

On January 23, 2015, the Company entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement
with an effective date of August 3, 2015. The agreement provides for the Company to pay interest for a
seven-year period at a fixed rate of 1.795% on an initial amortizing principal amount of $140.0 million
while receiving interest for the same period at the one-month LIBOR on the same notional amount.
The interest rate swap has been entered into as a hedge against LIBOR movements on the current
variable rate related to the Company’s real-estate backed Term Loan Agreement entered into on
August 14, 2014, explained in more detail in Note 7 ‘‘Long-Term Debt,’’ to protect against rising
interest rates. We expect that the interest rate swap will effectively fix the Company’s interest rate
payments on the $140.0 million of debt under the Company’s Term Loan Agreement. The swap
agreement qualifies as an ‘‘effective’’ hedge under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (‘‘ASC 815’’).

Interest rate swap agreements are entered into for periods consistent with related underlying
exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures. The Company’s interest rate
swap agreement is designated as a cash flow hedge at August 1, 2015 and is reflected at its fair value of
$0.7 million in the consolidated balance sheet.

The Company uses the ‘‘Hypothetical Derivative Method’’ described in ASC 815 for quarterly
prospective and retrospective assessments of hedge effectiveness, as well as for measurements of hedge
ineffectiveness. Under this method, the Company assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship
by comparing the changes in cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in cash
flows of the designated hedged transactions. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of the
derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently
reclassified to earnings in interest income when the hedged transactions affect earnings. Ineffectiveness
resulting from the hedge is recorded as a gain or loss in the consolidated statement of income as part
of other income. The Company did not have any hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings during
the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015. The Company also monitors the risk of counterparty default on
an ongoing basis and noted that the counterparties are reputable financial institutions.

Fuel Supply Agreements

From time to time the Company is a party to fixed price fuel supply agreements. During the fiscal

years ended August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, the Company entered into several agreements which
required it to purchase a portion of its diesel fuel each month at fixed prices through December 2016
and December 2014, respectively. These fixed price fuel agreements qualify for the ‘‘normal purchase’’

exception under ASC 815; therefore, the fuel purchases under these contracts are expensed as incurred
and included within operating expenses.

Financial Instruments

There were no financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis as of August 2, 2014.
The following table provides the fair value hierarchy for financial assets and liabilities measured on a
recurring basis as of August 1, 2015:

(In thousands)
Liabilities:
Interest Rate Swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fair Value at August 1,
2015

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

— $(726)

—

The fair value of the Company’s other financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents,

accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable and certain accrued expenses are derived using
Level 2 inputs and approximate carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
The fair value of notes payable approximate carrying amounts as they are variable rate instruments.

The following estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available

market information and appropriate valuation methodologies taking into account the instruments’
interest rate, terms, maturity date and collateral, if any, in comparison to the Company’s incremental
borrowing rate for similar financial instruments and are therefore deemed Level 2 inputs. However,
considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value.
Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the
Company could realize in a current market exchange.

(In thousands)
Liabilities

Long term debt, including current

August 1, 2015

August 2, 2014

Carrying
Value

Fair Value

Carrying
Value

Fair Value

portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$186,393

$192,679

$33,500

$36,386

9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company leases various facilities and equipment under operating lease agreements with
varying terms. Most of the leases contain renewal options and purchase options at several specific dates
throughout the terms of the leases.

Rent and other lease expense for the fiscal years ended August 1, 2015, August 2, 2014 and
August 3, 2013 totaled approximately $74.8 million, $65.1 million and $59.5 million, respectively.

Future minimum annual fixed payments required under non-cancelable operating leases having an

original term of more than one year as of August 1, 2015 are as follows:

Fiscal Year

(In thousands)

$ 51,341
45,731
39,213
31,786
21,237
37,904

$227,212

As of August 1, 2015, outstanding commitments for the purchase of inventory were approximately

$17.5 million. The Company had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $35.2 million at
August 1, 2015.

As of August 1, 2015, outstanding commitments for the purchase of diesel fuel were approximately

$21.7 million.

The Company may from time to time be involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the

ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, amounts accrued, as well as the total
amount of reasonably possible losses with respect to such matters, individually and in the aggregate, are
not deemed to be material to the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Legal expenses incurred in connection with claims and legal actions are expensed as incurred.

10. RETIREMENT PLANS

Retirement Plan

The Company has a defined contribution retirement plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code, the United Natural Foods, Inc. Retirement Plan (the ‘‘Retirement Plan’’). In order to
become a participant in the Retirement Plan, employees must meet certain eligibility requirements as
described in the Retirement Plan document. In addition to amounts contributed to the Retirement Plan
by employees, the Company makes contributions to the Retirement Plan on behalf of the employees.
The Company also has the Millbrook Distribution Services Union Retirement Plan, which was assumed
as part of an acquisition during fiscal 2008. The Company’s contributions to these plans were
approximately $6.4 million, $5.8 million, and $5.2 million for the fiscal years ended August 1, 2015,
August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013, respectively.

Deferred Compensation and Supplemental Retirement Plans

The Company’s non-employee directors and certain of its employees are eligible to participate in

the United Natural Foods Deferred Compensation Plan and the United Natural Foods Deferred Stock
Plan (collectively the ‘‘Deferral Plans’’). The Deferral Plans are nonqualified deferred compensation
plans which are administered by the Company’s Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
The Deferral Plans were established to provide participants with the opportunity to defer the receipt of
all or a portion of their compensation to a non-qualified retirement plan in amounts greater than the
amount permitted to be deferred under the Company’s 401(k) Plan. The Company believes that this is
an appropriate benefit because (i) it operates to place employees and non-employee directors in the
same position as other employees who are not affected by Internal Revenue Code limits placed on
plans such as the Company’s 401(k) Plan; (ii) does not substantially increase the Company’s financial
obligations to its employees and directors (there are no employer matching contributions, only a
crediting of deemed earnings); and (iii) provides additional incentives to the Company’s employees and

directors, since amounts set aside by the employees and directors are subject to the claims of the
Company’s creditors until paid. Under the Deferral Plans, only the payment of the compensation
earned by the participant is deferred and there is no deferral of the expense in the Company’s financial
statements related to the participants’ earnings; the Company records the related compensation expense
in the year in which the compensation is earned by the participants.

Under the Deferred Stock Plan, which was frozen to new deferrals effective January 1, 2007, each

eligible participant could elect to defer between 0% and 100% of restricted stock awards granted
during the election calendar year. Effective January 1, 2007, each participant may elect to defer up to
100% of their restricted share unit awards, performance shares and performance units under the
Deferred Compensation Plan. Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, each participant may also elect
to defer a minimum of $1,000 and a maximum of 90% of base salary and 100% of director fees,
employee bonuses and commissions, as applicable, earned by the participants for the calendar year.
Participants’ cash-derived deferrals accrue earnings and appreciation based on the performance of
mutual funds selected by the participant. The value of equity-based awards deferred under the
Deferred Compensation and Deferred Stock Plans are based upon the performance of the Company’s
common stock.

The Millbrook Deferred Compensation Plan and the Millbrook Supplemental Retirement Plan
were assumed by the Company as part of an acquisition during fiscal 2008. Deferred compensation
relates to a compensation arrangement implemented in 1984 by a predecessor of the acquired company
in the form of a non-qualified defined benefit plan and a supplemental retirement plan which
permitted former officers and certain management employees, at the time, to defer portions of their
compensation to earn specified maximum benefits upon retirement. The future obligations, which are
fixed in accordance with the plans, have been recorded at a discount rate of 5.7%. These plans do not
allow new participants, and there are no active employees subject to these plans.

In an effort to provide for the benefits associated with these plans, the acquired company’s

predecessor purchased whole-life insurance contracts on the plan participants. The cash surrender value
of these policies included in Other Assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet was $11.5 million and
$10.9 million at August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, respectively. At August 1, 2015, total future
obligations including interest, assuming commencement of payments at an individual’s retirement age,
as defined under the deferred compensation arrangement, were as follows:

Fiscal Year

(In thousands)

$ 1,360
1,248
1,067
1,063
953
4,693

$10,384

11. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

The Company adopted the UNFI Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the ‘‘ESOP’’) for the purpose

of acquiring outstanding shares of the Company for the benefit of eligible employees. The ESOP was
effective as of November 1, 1988 and has received notice of qualification by the Internal Revenue
Service.

In connection with the adoption of the ESOP, a Trust was established to hold the shares acquired.

On November 1, 1988, the Trust purchased 40% of the then outstanding common stock of the
Company at a price of $4.1 million. The trustees funded this purchase by issuing promissory notes to
the initial stockholders, with the Trust shares pledged as collateral. These notes bear interest at 1.33%
as of August 2, 2014, and were payable through May 2015. As the debt was repaid, the shares were
released from collateral and allocated to active employees, based on the proportion of principal and
interest paid in the year.

All shares held by the ESOP were purchased prior to December 31, 1992, except that 9,393 shares
were purchased during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 to fund the final allocation of shares under the
ESOP. As a result, prior to the final release of the shares in the ESOP, the Company considered
unreleased shares of the ESOP to be outstanding for purposes of calculating both basic and diluted
earnings per share, whether or not the shares had been committed to be released. Prior to the
repayments, the debt of the ESOP was recorded as debt and the shares pledged as collateral are
reported as unearned ESOP shares in the consolidated balance sheets. During the fiscal years ended
August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, contributions totaling approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, were made to the Trust. Of these contributions, less than $0.1 million in each fiscal year
represented interest.

The ESOP shares were classified as follows:

Total ESOP shares—beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shares distributed to employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total ESOP shares—end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Allocated shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unreleased shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total ESOP shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

(In thousands)

1,595
(538)

1,057

1,057
—

1,057

1,833
(238)

1,595

1,580
15

1,595

During the fiscal years ended August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, 24,512 and 41,089 shares were

released for allocation based on note payments, respectively. All shares have been released as of
August 1, 2015. The fair value of unreleased shares was approximately $0.9 million at August 2, 2014.

12. INCOME TAXES

For the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015, income before income taxes consists of $227.4 million

from U.S. operations and $2.4 million from foreign operations. For the fiscal year ended August 2,
2014, income before income taxes consists of $201.1 million from U.S. operations and $6.3 million from
foreign operations. For the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013, income before income taxes consists of
$166.7 million from U.S. operations and $7.4 million from foreign operations.

Total federal and state income tax (benefit) expense consists of the following:

Fiscal year ended August 1, 2015
U.S. Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State & Local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal year ended August 2, 2014
U.S. Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State & Local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal year ended August 3, 2013
U.S. Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State & Local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Current

Deferred

Total

(In thousands)

$60,848
14,119
729

$13,209
2,098
32

$74,057
$16,217
761
$

$75,696

$15,339

$91,035

$66,953
12,660
1,432

$ (894) $66,059
14,112
1,755

1,452
323

$81,045

881

$81,926

$44,095
13,366
2,021

$ 7,029
(364)
115

$51,124
13,002
2,136

$59,482

$ 6,780

$66,262

Total income tax expense (benefit) was different than the amounts computed using the United

States statutory income tax rate of 35% applied to income before income taxes as a result of the
following:

Computed ‘‘expected’’ tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local income tax, net of Federal income tax

benefit

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-deductible expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . .
General business credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal year ended

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

August 3,
2013

$80,419

(In thousands)
$72,593

$60,940

10,547
1,551
165
(365)
(1,282)

9,135
1,333
160
(114)
(1,181)

7,501
1,516
134
(1,374)
(2,455)

Total income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$91,035

$81,926

$66,262

Total income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended August 1, 2015, August 2, 2014 and

August 3, 2013 was allocated as follows:

Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholders’ equity, difference between compensation
expense for tax purposes and amounts recognized
for financial statement purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

August 1,
2015

August 2,
2014

August 3,
2013

$91,035

(In thousands)
$81,926

$66,262

(2,746)
(293)

(2,601)
—

(1,952)
—

$87,996

$79,325

$64,310

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the net deferred

tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014 are presented below:

Deferred tax assets:
Inventories, principally due to additional costs inventoried for

tax purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation and benefits related . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable, principally due to allowances for

uncollectible accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total gross deferred tax assets
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2015

2014

(In thousands)

$ 9,034
23,651

$ 7,532
24,129

3,279
9,077
1,177
313

46,531
—

3,000
10,438
1,295
21

46,415
—

Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 46,531

$ 46,415

Deferred tax liabilities:
Plant and equipment, principally due to differences in

depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 47,872
31,955
15

$ 36,494
28,124
274

Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

79,842

64,892

Net deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(33,311) $(18,477)

Current deferred income tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-current deferred income tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 32,333
(65,644)

$ 32,518
(50,995)

$(33,311) $(18,477)

In assessing the need to establish a valuation reserve for the recoverability of deferred tax assets,
the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
assets will not be realized. The Company considers relevant evidence, both positive and negative, to
determine the need for a valuation allowance. Information evaluated includes the Company’s financial
position and results of operations for the current and preceding years, the availability of deferred tax
liabilities and tax carrybacks, as well as an evaluation of currently available information about future
years. As of August 1, 2015, the Company has sufficient taxable income in the federal carryback period
and anticipates sufficient future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are
deductible. The Company also has the availability of future reversals of taxable temporary differences
that are expected to generate taxable income in the future. Therefore, the ultimate realization of
deferred tax assets for federal and state tax purposes appears more likely than not at August 1, 2015
and correspondingly no valuation allowance has been established.

At August 1, 2015, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$3.3 million for federal income tax purposes. The federal carryforwards are subject to an annual
limitation of approximately $0.3 million under Internal Revenue Code Section 382. The carryforwards
expire at various times between fiscal years 2017 and 2027.

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction

and in various state jurisdictions. UNFI Canada files income tax returns in Canada and certain of its
provinces. U.S. federal income tax examination years prior to 2012 have either statutorily or
administratively been closed with the Internal Revenue Service, and with limited exception, the fiscal

tax years that remain subject to examination by state jurisdictions range from the Company’s fiscal 2011
to fiscal 2014.

The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component

of income tax expense. For the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015, the Company recognized net tax
benefits of approximately $0.5 million in its consolidated statement of income. For the fiscal year ended
August 2, 2014, the Company recognized net tax benefits of $0.3 million in its consolidated statement
of income related to tax examinations closed during the fiscal year. For the fiscal year ended August 3,
2013, the Company recognized net tax benefits of $4.4 million in its consolidated statement of income
related to tax examinations closed during the fiscal year.

The undistributed earnings of the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries approximated $16.1 million at

August 1, 2015. We consider the undistributed earnings to be indefinitely reinvested; therefore, we have
not provided a deferred tax liability for any residual U.S. tax that may be due upon repatriation of
these earnings. Because of the effect of U.S. foreign tax credits, it is not practicable to estimate the
amount of tax that might be payable on these earnings in the event they no longer are indefinitely
reinvested.

13. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company has several operating divisions aggregated under the wholesale segment, which is the

Company’s only reportable segment. These operating divisions have similar products and services,
customer channels, distribution methods and historical margins. The wholesale segment is engaged in
the national distribution of natural, organic and specialty foods, produce and related products in the
United States and Canada.

The Company has additional operating divisions that do not meet the quantitative thresholds for
reportable segments and are therefore aggregated under the caption of ‘‘Other’’. ‘‘Other’’ includes a
retail division, which engages in the sale of natural foods and related products to the general public
through retail storefronts on the east coast of the United States, a manufacturing division, which
engages in importing, roasting and packaging of nuts, seeds, dried fruit and snack items, and the
Company’s branded product lines. ‘‘Other’’ also includes certain corporate operating expenses that are
not allocated to operating divisions, which consist of depreciation, salaries, retainers, and other related
expenses of officers, directors, corporate finance (including professional services), information
technology, governance, legal, human resources and internal audit that are necessary to operate the
Company’s headquarters located in Providence, Rhode Island. As the Company continues to expand its
business and serve its customers through a new national platform, these corporate expense amounts
have increased, which is the primary driver behind the increasing operating losses within the ‘‘Other’’
category below. Non-operating expenses that are not allocated to the operating divisions are under the
caption of ‘‘Unallocated Expenses’’. The Company does not record its revenues for financial reporting
purposes by product group, and it is therefore impracticable for the Company to report them
accordingly.

Following is business segment information for the periods indicated:

Wholesale

Other

Eliminations

Unallocated
Expenses

Consolidated

(In thousands)

Fiscal year ended August 1, 2015
Net sales
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiscal year ended August 2, 2014
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net sales
Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiscal year ended August 3, 2013
Net sales
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$8,099,818
259,214

$225,520
(16,295)

$(140,360)
(962)

64,452
125,217
248,909
2,378,686

(652)
3,917
17,731
189,149

(17,645)

$6,709,119
236,062

$206,618
(24,542)

$(121,290)
(732)

46,516
145,875
256,817
2,146,114

2,242
1,428
17,731
156,053

(13,276)

$5,997,235
225,895

$186,505
(38,836)

$(119,385)
(1,565)

40,148
64,969
184,143
1,596,131

2,250
1,585
17,731
145,770

(11,993)

$14,498
(356)
(1,954)

$ 7,753
(508)
(3,865)

$ 5,897
(632)
6,113

$8,184,978
241,957
14,498
(356)
(1,954)
229,769
63,800
129,134
266,640
2,550,190

$6,794,447
210,788
7,753
(508)
(3,865)
207,408
48,758
147,303
274,548
2,288,891

$6,064,355
185,494
5,897
(632)
6,113
174,116
42,398
66,554
201,874
1,729,908

14. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

The following table sets forth certain key interim financial information for the fiscal years ended

August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014:

2015
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income taxes . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Per common share income
Basic: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average basic

First
Quarter

Second
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter

Full Year

(In thousands except per share data)

$1,992,476
318,996
54,615
33,042

$2,016,546
299,199
46,023
27,844

$2,114,643
325,914
69,571
41,750

$2,061,313
316,406
59,560
36,098

$8,184,978
1,260,515
229,769
138,734

$
$

0.66
0.66

$
$

0.56
0.55

$
$

0.83
0.83

$
$

0.72
0.72

$
$

2.77
2.76

Shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49,889

50,025

50,079

50,091

50,021

Weighted average diluted

Shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,113

50,277

50,348

50,330

50,267

Market Price

High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$
$

69.51
58.48

$
$

80.77
67.71

$
$

83.91
66.34

$
$

69.26
45.26

$
$

83.91
45.26

2014
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income taxes . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Per common share income
Basic: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average basic

First
Quarter

Second
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter

Full Year

(In thousands except per share data)

$1,602,011
271,176
46,273
27,764

$1,646,041
268,167
46,586
27,951

$1,781,729
298,129
60,653
36,392

$1,764,666
290,173
53,896
33,375

$6,794,447
1,127,645
207,408
125,482

$
$

0.56
0.56

$
$

0.56
0.56

$
$

0.73
0.73

$
$

0.67
0.67

$
$

2.53*
2.52

Shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49,439

49,615

49,635

49,675

49,602

Weighted average diluted

Shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49,735

49,873

49,931

49,972

49,888

Market Price

High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$
$

75.85
58.29

$
$

76.85
66.74

$
$

79.64
64.12

$
$

69.85
58.04

$
$

79.64
58.04

Total reflects rounding

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

In the first half of fiscal year 2015, management identified immaterial errors related to the
understatement of contractual obligations due to a customer that occurred during fiscal years 2009
through 2014. The immaterial errors were a result of a lack of effective controls over the completeness
and accuracy of the recognition and measurement of amounts due to a customer, including the
underlying data and assumptions used in the calculation of amounts owed. The internal controls in
place during this time were not responsive to changes in circumstances.

While the control deficiency did not result in a material misstatement to the Company’s

consolidated financial statements for any periods through and including the fiscal year ended August 2,
2014, or unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the first and second quarters of
fiscal year 2015, it did represent a material weakness as of August 2, 2014, since there existed a
reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial
statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The correction of these immaterial
errors were recognized as out-of-period adjustments to the interim financial information as of and for
the period ended January 31, 2015.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act
as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the ‘‘Evaluation Date’’).
Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Remediation

The Company believes it has fully remediated the underlying causes of the material weakness in its

internal control over financial reporting noted above. Following the identification of the foregoing
material weakness in the first half of fiscal 2015, management implemented a remediation plan.
Management believes that the implementation of this plan and the performance of the components of
the plan remediated the material weakness described above.

The following steps of the remediation plan were completed as of August 1, 2015:

(cid:129) implementation of management’s review and analysis of the calculation including the cross-

functional confirmation of the accuracy and completeness of the underlying data and
assumptions; and

(cid:129) implementation of the review and analysis on a quarterly basis.

Because the Company was able to demonstrate that the new controls implemented as part of the

remediation plan were operating effectively, management concluded that the material weakness
described above does not exist as of August 1, 2015. The Company and its Board of Directors are
committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment, and believe that the remediation
efforts performed represent significant improvements in our control environment.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over

financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f)
promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our
principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management

and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

(cid:129) Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the

transactions and dispositions of our assets;

(cid:129) Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that
receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our
management and directors; and

(cid:129) Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized

acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the
risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the

effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of August 1, 2015. In making this
assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 framework).
Based on its assessment, our management concluded that, as of August 1, 2015, our internal control
over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria at the reasonable assurance level.

Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of August 1, 2015 has been
audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its attestation
report which is included in ‘‘Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data’’ of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange
Act Rule 13a-15(f)or 15d-15(f)) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended August 1, 2015 that materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

As discussed above, subsequent to the issuance of our consolidated financial statements as of and
for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014, immaterial errors related to prior periods were identified that
indicated certain deficiencies existed in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. The
Company concluded that these deficiencies when aggregated could have resulted in a material
misstatement of the consolidated financial statements that would not have been prevented or detected
on a timely basis, and as such, these control deficiencies resulted in a material weakness in our internal
control over financial reporting as of August 2, 2014. This material weakness did not result in any
material misstatement of the Company’s financial statements and disclosures for the fiscal years ended
July 28, 2012, August 3, 2013 and August 2, 2014. As discussed above, the Company completed actions
to remediate the material weakness related to our internal controls over the calculations of the
contractual obligations owing to a customer pursuant to the Company’s distribution agreement with the
customer, including implementing new controls around the preparation and review of the calculation of
amounts due to the customer. As a result of the completion of this remediation plan, and as more fully
described above, the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting has been fully

addressed and our management has concluded that as of August 1, 2015, the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting was effective based on the criteria used by management to evaluate the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III.

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item will be contained, in part, in our Definitive Proxy Statement
on Schedule 14A for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on December 16, 2015 (the ‘‘2015
Proxy Statement’’) under the captions ‘‘Directors and Nominees for Director,’’ ‘‘Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,’’ and ‘‘Committees of the Board of Directors—Audit
Committee’’ and is incorporated herein by this reference. Pursuant to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K,
our executive officers are reported under the caption ‘‘Executive Officers of the Registrant’’ in Part I,
Item I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We have adopted a code of conduct and ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief

Financial Officer, and employees within our finance, operations, and sales departments. Our code of
conduct and ethics is publicly available on our website at www.unfi.com and is available free of charge
by writing to United Natural Foods, Inc., 313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, Rhode Island 02908, Attn:
Investor Relations. We intend to make any legally required disclosures regarding amendments to, or
waivers of, the provisions of the code of conduct and ethics on our website at www.unfi.com. Please
note that our website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item will be contained in the 2015 Proxy Statement under the

captions ‘‘Non-employee Director Compensation,’’ ‘‘Executive Compensation’’, ‘‘Compensation
Discussion and Analysis’’, ‘‘Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation’’ and ‘‘Report
of the Compensation Committee’’ and is incorporated herein by this reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item will be contained, in part, in the 2015 Proxy Statement

under the caption ‘‘Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management’’, and is
incorporated herein by this reference.

The following table provides certain information with respect to equity awards under our equity

compensation plans as of August 1, 2015.

Plan Category

Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in the second column)

Plans approved by stockholders . . .
Plans not approved by stockholders

1,065,748(1)
80,978(3)

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,146,726

$46.97(1)
—(3)

$46.97

761,493(2)
—

761,493

(1) Includes 218,781 restricted stock units under the 2012 Plan, 38,101 performance-based restricted

stock units under the 2012 Plan and 134,959 stock options under the 2012 Plan, 364,350 restricted
stock units under the 2004 Plan, 95,775 stock options under the 2004 Plan, 207,782 stock options
under the 2002 Plan and 6,000 stock options under the 1996 Plan. Restricted stock units and
performance stock units do not have an exercise price because their value is dependent upon
continued employment over a period of time or the achievement of certain performance goals, and
are to be settled for shares of common stock. Accordingly, they have been disregarded for
purposes of computing the weighted-average exercise price.

(2) All shares were available for issuance under the 2012 Plan. The 2012 Plan authorizes grants in the
form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance
shares, performance units or a combination thereof but includes limits on the number of awards
that may be issued in the form of restricted shares or units. The number of shares remaining
available for future issuances assumes that, with respect to outstanding performance-based
restricted stock units, the vesting criteria will be achieved at the target level.

(3) Consists of phantom stock units outstanding under the United Natural Foods Inc. Deferred

Compensation Plan. Phantom stock units do not have an exercise price because the units may be
settled only for shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis at a future date as outlined in the
plan.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR

INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item will be contained in the 2015 Proxy Statement under the

caption ‘‘Certain Relationships and Related Transactions’’ and ‘‘Director Independence’’ and is
incorporated herein by this reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item will be contained in the 2015 Proxy Statement under the

caption ‘‘Fees Paid to KPMG LLP’’ and is incorporated herein by this reference.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Documents filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PART IV.

Financial Statements. The Financial Statements listed in the Index to Financial Statements in
Item 8 hereof are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Financial Statement Schedules. All schedules have been omitted because they are either not
required or the information required is included in our consolidated financial statements or
the notes thereto included in Item 8 hereof.

3. Exhibits. The Exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such Exhibits are

filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the

registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.

SIGNATURES

UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC.

/s/ MARK E. SHAMBER

Mark E. Shamber
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Dated: September 30, 2015

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed

below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.

Name

Title

Date

/s/ STEVEN L. SPINNER

Steven L. Spinner

/s/ MICHAEL S. FUNK

Michael S. Funk

/s/ MARK E. SHAMBER

Mark E. Shamber

/s/ ANN TORRE BATES

Ann Torre Bates

/s/ DENISE M. CLARK

Denise M. Clark

/s/ GAIL A. GRAHAM

Gail A. Graham

/s/ JAMES P. HEFFERNAN

James P. Heffernan

/s/ PETER ROY

Peter Roy

/s/ RICHARD J. SCHNIEDERS

Richard J. Schnieders

President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director (Principal Executive Officer)

September 30, 2015

Chair of the Board

September 30, 2015

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)

September 30, 2015

Director

Exhibit No.

2.1

2.2

3.1

3.2

4.1

10.1**

10.2**

10.3

10.4

10.5

10.6

EXHIBIT INDEX

Description

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated May 10, 2010, by and among UNFI Canada, Inc., a
subsidiary of the Registrant, with SunOpta Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Drive
Organics Corp. (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed on May 11, 2010 (File No. 1-15723)). (Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of
Regulation S-K, the schedules and exhibits have been omitted from this filing.)

Amendment No 1., dated June 4, 2010, to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated May 10,
2010, by and among UNFI Canada, Inc., a subsidiary of the Registrant, with SunOpta Inc.
and its wholly owned subsidiary, Drive Organics Corp. (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 1-15723)).

Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (restated for SEC filing
purposes only) (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1, 2015 (File No. 1-15723)).

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (restated for SEC filing purposes only)
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended January 1, 2015 (File No. 1-15723)).

Specimen Certificate for shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, of the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended August 1, 2009 (File No. 1-15723)).

Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan, effective March 1, 2004
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended July 31, 2004 (File No. 1-15723)).

Amendments No. 1 through 8 to Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended August 3, 2013 (File No. 1-15723)).

Employee Stock Ownership Trust Loan Agreement among Norman Cloutier, Steven
Townsend, Daniel Atwood, Theodore Cloutier and the Employee Stock Ownership Plan
and Trust, dated November 1, 1988 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-11349)).

Stock Pledge Agreement between the Employee Stock Ownership Trust and Steven
Townsend, Trustee for Norman Cloutier, Steven Townsend, Daniel Atwood and Theodore
Cloutier, dated November 1, 1988 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-11349)).

Trust Agreement among Norman Cloutier, Steven Townsend, Daniel Atwood, Theodore
Cloutier and Steven Townsend as Trustee, dated November 1, 1988 (incorporated by
reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-11349)).

Guaranty Agreement between the Registrant and Steven Townsend as Trustee for Norman
Cloutier, Steven Townsend, Daniel Atwood and Theodore Cloutier, dated November 1,
1988 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-11349)).

10.7**

Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the year ended July 31, 2000 (File
No. 1-15723)).

Exhibit No.

10.8**

10.9**

10.10**

10.11**

10.12**

10.13**

10.14**

10.15**

10.16**

10.17**

10.18**

10.19**

10.20**

10.21**

Description

Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by
reference to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the year ended July 31, 2000
(File No. 1-15723)).

Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by
reference to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the year ended July 31, 2000
(File No. 1-15723)).

2002 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2003 (File No. 1-15723)).

United Natural Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on
December 21, 2010 (File No. 1-15723)).

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on
Form S-8 POS (File No. 333-123462)).

Form of Restricted Unit Award Agreement, pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2004
Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010 (File No. 1-15723)).

Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement, pursuant to the Amended and
Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010 (File No. 1-15723)).

Form of Performance Share Agreement, pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2004
Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed on March 18, 2011 (File No. 1-15723)).

Form of Performance Share Award Agreement, pursuant to the Amended and Restated
2004 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended July 30, 2011 (File No. 1-15723)).

Form of Performance Unit Award Agreement, pursuant to the Amended and Restated
2004 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended July 30, 2011(File No. 1-15723)).

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, pursuant to the Amended and Restated
2004 Equity Incentive Plan (Employee) (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 28, 2012 (File No. 1-15723)).

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, pursuant to the Amended and Restated
2004 Equity Incentive Plan (Director) (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 28, 2012 (File No. 1-15723)).

Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement, pursuant to the 2002 Stock
Incentive Plan (Employee) (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended July 28, 2012 (File No. 1-15723)).

Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement, pursuant to the Amended and
Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (Director) (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 28, 2012 (File
No. 1-15723)).

Exhibit No.

10.22**

10.23**

10.24**

10.25**

10.26**

10.27**

10.28**

10.29**

10.30**

10.31**

Description

Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement, pursuant to the Amended and
Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (Employee) (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 28, 2012 (File
No. 1-15723)).

United Natural Foods, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 18, 2012 (File No. 1-15723))
(the ‘‘2012 Equity Plan’’).

Form of Terms and Conditions of Grant of Non-Statutory Stock Options to Employee,
pursuant to the 2012 Equity Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 26, 2013 (File No. 1-15723)).

Form of Terms and Conditions of Grant of Non-Statutory Stock Options to Director,
pursuant to the 2012 Equity Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 26, 2013 (File No. 1-15723)).

Form of Terms and Conditions of Grant of Restricted Share Units to Employee, pursuant
to the 2012 Equity Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 26, 2013) (File No. 1-15723).

Form of Terms and Conditions of Grant of Restricted Share Units to Director, pursuant to
the 2012 Equity Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 26, 2013) (File No. 1-15723).

Form of Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement, pursuant to
the 2012 Equity Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 26, 2013) (File No. 1-15723).

Form of Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Share Award Agreement, pursuant to the
2012 Equity Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 26, 2013) (File No. 1-15723).

Fiscal 2014 Senior Management Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 3, 2013 (File
No. 1-15723)).

Fiscal 2015 Senior Management Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 2, 2014 (File
No. 1-15723)).

10.32* ** Fiscal 2016 Senior Management Cash Incentive Plan.

10.33**

10.34**

10.35**

United Natural Foods, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 30, 2011 (File
No. 1-15723)).

United Natural Foods, Inc. Deferred Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 30, 2011(File
No. 1-15723)).

Offer Letter between Steven L. Spinner, President and CEO, and the Registrant, dated
August 27, 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 1, 2008 (File No. 1-15723)).

Exhibit No.

10.36**

10.37**

10.38

10.39

10.40

10.41**

10.42**

10.43**

10.44

10.45+

10.46+

10.47+

Description

Amendment to Offer Letter between Steven L. Spinner, President and CEO, and the
Registrant, dated August 27, 2008 to include application of Incentive Compensation
Recoupment Policy of UNFI (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009 (File No. 1-15723)).

Severance Agreement between Steven L. Spinner, President and CEO, and the Registrant,
effective as of September 16, 2008 (included within Exhibit 10.36, which is incorporated by
reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
November 1, 2008 (File No. 1-15723)).

Form Indemnification Agreement for Directors and Officers (incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2009 (File
No. 1-15723)).

Form of Modification of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 3, 2013 (File
No. 1-15723)).

Revised Form Indemnification Agreement for Directors and Officers (incorporated by
reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 3,
2013 (File No. 1-15723)).

Form of Change in Control Agreement between the Registrant and each of Mark Shamber
and Joseph J. Traficanti (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010 (File No. 1-15723)).

Form of Change in Control Agreement between the Registrant and each of Eric Dorne,
Thomas Dziki, Sean Griffin, Craig Smith, Christopher Testa and Donald McIntyre
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended July 31, 2010 (File No. 1-15723)).

Severance Agreement between the Registrant and each of Eric Dorne, Michael Funk,
Thomas Dziki, Sean Griffin, Craig Smith, Christopher Testa, Donald McIntyre, Mark
Shamber and Joseph J. Traficanti (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 7, 2008 (File No. 1-15723)).

Real Estate Term Notes between the Registrant and City National Bank, dated April 28,
2000 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended July 31, 2000 (File No. 1-15723)).

Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and Whole Foods Market
Distribution, Inc., effective September 26, 2006 (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 28, 2006 (File
No. 1-15723)).

Amendment to Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and Whole Foods Market
Distribution, Inc., effective June 2, 2010 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010 (File No. 1-15723)).

Amendment to Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and Whole Foods
Distribution effective October 11, 2010 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 30, 2010 (File
No. 1-15723)).

Exhibit No.

10.48

10.49+

10.50

10.51+

Description

Third Amendment to the Agreement for Distribution of Products between Whole Foods
Market Distribution, Inc. and the Registrant, effective February 20, 2014 (incorporated by
reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 3,
2014 (File No. 1-15723)).

Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated May 24, 2012, by and
among United Natural Foods, Inc., United Natural Foods West, Inc., United Natural
Trading Co. and UNFI Canada, Inc. as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, Bank of
America, N.A. as Administrative Agent for the Lenders, Bank of America, N.A. (acting
through its Canada branch), as Canadian Agent for the Lenders and the other parties
thereto (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
on May 31, 2012 (File No. 1-15723)).

First Amendment Agreement dated May 21, 2014, by and among United Natural
Foods, Inc., United Natural Foods West, Inc. and UNFI Canada, Inc., as Borrowers, the
Lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent for the Lenders,
Bank of America, N.A. (acting through its Canada branch), as Canadian Agent for the
Lenders and the other parties thereto (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 28, 2014 (File No. 1-15723)).

Term Loan Agreement dated August 14, 2014, by and among United Natural Foods, Inc.
and Albert’s Organics, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, Bank of America,
N.A., as Administrative Agent for the Lenders, and the other parties thereto (incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 20, 2014
(File No. 1-15723)).

10.52**

Form of Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement, pursuant to
the 2012 Equity Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended August 2, 2014 (File No. 1-15723)).

10.53* ** Form of Two-Year Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement,

pursuant to the 2012 Equity Plan.

10.54* ** Form of One-Year Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement,

pursuant to the 2012 Equity Plan.

10.55

10.56

10.57

10.58

10.59

Lease between ALCO Cityside Federal LLC, and the Registrant, dated October 14, 2008
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended May 1, 2010 (File No. 1-15723)).

Amendment to Lease between ALCO Cityside Federal LLC, and the Registrant, dated
May 12, 2009 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1, 2010 (File No. 1-15723)).

Second Amendment to Lease between ALCO Cityside Federal LLC and the Registrant,
dated May 10, 2011 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2015 (File No. 1-15723)).

Third Amendment to Lease between ALCO Cityside Federal LLC and the Registrant,
dated August 7, 2013 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2015 (File No. 1-15723)).

Fourth Amendment to Lease between ALCO Cityside Federal LLC and the Registrant,
dated October 20, 2014 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2015 (File No. 1-15723)).

100

Exhibit No.

Description

21*

23.1*

31.1*

31.2*

32.1*

32.2*

101*

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The following materials from the United Natural Foods, Inc.’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2015, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible
Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated
Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income,
(iv) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Filed herewith.

** Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

+ Confidential treatment has been requested and granted with respect to certain portions of this

exhibit pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted
portions have been filed separately with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

101

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

NAME

Albert’s Organics, Inc.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Blue Marble Brands, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fromages de France, Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural Retail Group, Inc. (d/b/a Earth Origins Market) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Select Nutrition, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Springfield Development Corp LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tony’s Fine Foods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tutto Pronte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
UNFI Canada, Inc.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
United Natural Foods West, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
United Natural Trading, LLC (d/b/a Woodstock Farms Manufacturing) . .

Exhibit 21

JURISDICTION OF
INCORPORATION/FORMATION

California
Delaware
California
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
California
California
Canada
California
Delaware

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
United Natural Foods, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-197511) on

Form S-3 of United Natural Foods, Inc. and (No. 333-161845, 333-161884, 333-19947, 333-19949,
333-71673, 333-56652, 333-106217, 333-123462, and 333-185637) on Form S-8 of United Natural
Foods, Inc. of our report dated September 30, 2015, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
United Natural Foods, Inc. as of August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, and the related consolidated
statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended August 1, 2015, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of August 1, 2015, which report appears in the August 1, 2015 annual report on Form 10-K
of United Natural Foods, Inc.

Providence, Rhode Island
September 30, 2015

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven L. Spinner, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United Natural Foods, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact

or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining

disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;

presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial

reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent

evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the
audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal

control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ STEVEN L. SPINNER

Steven L. Spinner
Chief Executive Officer

September 30, 2015

Note: A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be

retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark E. Shamber, certify that: