Quarterlytics / Technology / Hardware, Equipment & Parts / Universal Electronics Inc.

Universal Electronics Inc.

ueic · NASDAQ Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker ueic
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Technology
Industry Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Employees 3838
← All annual reports
FY2005 Annual Report · Universal Electronics Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
digital
video
projector

surround
sound
speakers

video on
demand

stereo
system

interactive
television

bluetooth
enabled
vehicle

digital
audio
server

DVD

digital
cable

z-wave

universal electronics

universal electronics

05

05

annual
report

annual
report

dlp tv

camera
phone

hi fi
stereo
system

digital
video
camera

HDTV

cell
phone

MP3
player

satellite

stereo
receiver

laptop
pc

PDA

home
theater
in a box

home
systems

as the

technology

universe

expands

audio
receiver

digital
jukebox

sub
woofer

ceiling
fan

media
center
pc

DVR

VCR

plasma
tv

heating
cooling

amplifier

climate
control
system

digital
set top
box

lcd tv

wireless
hub

stereo
receiver

CD
player

digital
video
recorder

infrared

desktop
pc

subscription
broadcast

remote
control
blinds

lights

smart
phone

dimmer

fan

security
system

alarm

wi fi

subscription
broadcast

wall
bracket

satellite

HDTV

interactive
television

DVD
player

VCR

home
theater

digital
cable

audio
receiver

cassette
player

sub
woofer

amplifier

MP3
player

CD
player

surround
sound
speakers

universal 
electronics 
simplifies
As  technology 

in  the  home  becomes  more  and  more  

complex — with  the  growing  reliance  on  digital  media 

in  everyday  life — UEI  technology  is  simplifying  people’s  ability  

to access and control it.             No one’s in a better position to do so. UEI 

has the industry’s leading patent portfolio; the world’s largest infrared (IR) 

code library; and intelligent software that allows users to customize, sched-

ule,  and  synchronize  media  content  to  specific  entertainment  devices.  We’ve  

lighting

also developed partnerships with the world’s leading subscription broadcasting 

and consumer electronics giants — names like Comcast®, DirecTV ®, Pioneer®, and 

Panasonic®. For the past 20 years, Universal Electronics has built the capa-

bilities — and  the  infrastructure — to  connect  people  with  the  devices 

and entertainment they use everyday, to make them more acces-

sible  and  enjoyable.  After  all,  the  more  seamless  and 

comprehensive the connection, the better  

the experience.



remote
control
blinds

digital
media
player

smart
phone

camera
phone

PDA

laptop
computer

digital
video
recorder

wi-fi

digital
camera

bluetooth
enabled
vehicle

Universal

Electronics

connects

desktop
PC

security
system

alarm

heating/air
conditioning

ceiling
fan

 
Powered by UEI’s 
world-class library 
of IR codes and key 
technologies inside, 
our control solutions 
for the subscription 
broadcast industry 
deliver the best 
feature sets and 
highest product 
quality. Ultimately, 
enhancing the end 
user experience  
while reducing  
service costs.

TV

UEI connects:	

			Greg			

satellite

UEI is a leading supplier of control technology to the world’s largest cable and satellite service provid-

ers —including Comcast®, Cox Communications®, DirecTV®, SKY®, and TimeWarner®. Our comprehensive 

solutions range from key patented technologies that provide the upgradeability to accommodate new  

services and features, to award-winning industrial designs. UEI’s expertise allows every user to feel right  

at home with his or her remote control. That way, subscribers like Greg Stevens can enjoy the best high 

definition digital entertainment has to offer—everything from news and sports, to movies and music, 

not to mention services like Pay-Per-View and Video-On-Demand—without ever leaving his chair. After 

all, when he gets home from a hard day’s work, the last thing he needs is to fumble to get the game on.





The MediaRemote™ 
with SimpleCenter 
is an affordable 
multimedia remote 
control that enables 
anyone with a large 
collection of music, 
pictures, and video 
on their PC to expe-
rience and enjoy all 
this digital media in 
a home theater-like 
setting.

satellite

TV

DVR

DVD

Mp
MP
Player
player

UEI connects:	

			Vivian			

Vivian Simmons, marketing director for a packaged goods company, is a professional who’s always on 

the go. The few evenings a week she’s not traveling, she wants to enjoy home entertainment — without 

distractions or technology glitches. And thanks to UEI, that’s just what she’s able to do. Since Vivian’s 

satellite TV provider, DirecTV®, uses UEI technology, she has an easy way to set her DVR to record all 

her favorite shows while she’s on the road. And with UEI’s SimpleCenter™ software, she can also enjoy 

all her personal digital media — including music and photos — anywhere in her home — even in a home 

theater-like setting on her PC with UEI’s MediaRemote. That way, when she gets home from a long  

business trip, all she has to worry about is which show to watch first.

digital
camera

PDA

laptop
computer

smart
phone





UEI’s retail brand,  
One for All®, is the 
leading brand of  
remote control  
devices worldwide— 
recognized by the 
trade and consumers 
as the best in quality 
and design. They  
are sold at leading 
retailers around the 
globe, including 
Best Buy®, WalMart®, 
Dixons®, Carrefour®, 
Tweeter® and  
Costco®.

video
game

dvd

TV

vcr

UEI connects:	

			Andrew			

cable

UEI technology is making home entertainment safer for kids — and more acceptable to parents. Like  

most six-year olds these days, Andrew Nichols has his favorite movies on both DVD and VHS, enjoys  

video  games,  and  is  only  allowed  to  watch  certain  “Mom-approved”  channels  on  TV.  The  family’s  

One For All® universal remote control has replaced all the other control devices the dog chewed up or 

Andrew dropped in the toilet. Thanks to UEI’s patented macro technology, Mom can start up a movie 

for Andrew with a single key press on the remote, while she’s in the kitchen. And she can program in 

Andrew’s favorite “kid-friendly” channels, allowing him to safely switch from one cartoon channel to 

another — and stay amused long enough for her to get dinner on the table.

desktop
PC





Powered by UEI’s 
world-class connec-
tivity software and 
equipped with built-in 
Wi-Fi, NevoSL delivers 
the most advanced 
and unmatched user 
experience for total 
control of audio/visual 
(A/V) entertainment 
and digital media  
content throughout 
the networked home.

video
game

digital
camera

DVD

satellite

HDTV

wall
bracket

surround
sound
speakers

sub
woofer

audio
receiver

CD
changer

UEI connects:	

			Carl			

UEI  technology  is  enabling  in  every  sense  of  the  word.  Take  Carl  Phillips,  for  example,  a  software  

PDA

engineer  by  day  and  a  digital  entertainment  junkie  the  rest  of  the  time.  Carl  has  all  the  very  latest  

innovations — from  a  wall  mounted  HDTV,  to  his  Bluetooth®-enabled  car,  to  NevoSL®,  UEI’s  award- 

winning,  ultimate  controller  for  the  broadband  home.  NevoSL  allows  Carl  to  access  and  stream  the 

digital pictures and music stored on his PC — or anywhere on his home network — to the high-definition 

plasma TV screen and Dolby® surround sound speakers in his living room. That way, he can enjoy his 

favorite playlist just the way he likes to — from the comfort of his black leather chair.

desktop
PC

home
network

cell
phone

bluetooth
enabled
vehicle





SimpleCenter™, 

the center of  
your digital life. 
SimpleCenter is a 
full-featured PC 
application for 
the management, 
control and mobil-
ity of all your digital 
media — music, 
pictures, and 
movies.

TV

speakers

DVD

MP
player

audio
receiver

UEI connects:	

			Kim			

Whether  it’s  downloading  new  music,  chatting  with  her  friends,  channel  surfing  (or  doing  all  three  

simultaneously),  Kim  Carter  likes  to  be  connected  at  all  times—to  her  friends,  to  her  family,  to  her  

entertainment  content,  and,  most  of  all,  to  her  entertainment  devices.  These  include  her  TV,  DVD 

player, MP3 player, cell phone (which is also a camera), and her laptop computer. Now, thanks to UEI’s 

new SimpleCenter software, she can organize, enjoy, and share all her digital media at home or on the 

go. With SimpleCenter, Kim can wirelessly transfer digital music, pictures, and movies between her cell 

phone and her laptop. She can even use her cell phone to stream digital media anywhere in her house. 

Now that’s what you call connected. And it’s simple, with SimpleCenter.

camera
phone

laptop
computer

0



UEI’s Helix marks 
another giant leap 
in providing total 
home control. Not 
only does it seam-
lessly control a vast 
array of A/V devices, 
but now, enabled 
with an emerging RF 
technology for the 
home called Z-Wave, 
also allows users to 
expand their range 
of control to include 
lighting, air condition-
ing, security and other 
home systems.

UEI connects:	

			Arthur			

UEI’s world-class connectivity software is second to none, guaranteeing compatibility with all kinds of 

home entertainment devices — old and new — and now expanding into complete home control systems.  

Equipped with advanced radio frequency (RF) technology such as Z-Wave®, UEI further extends its control  

solutions to be compatible with virtually every device in Arthur Monroe’s house. Though he’s far from  

being a “techie”, Arthur does appreciate technology that helps to simplify his life, instead of complicat-

ing it. That’s why he likes UEI’s Helix™ remote so much. It allows him to control all the various devices in 

his home, so he can cue the latest movie from his DVD Changer, turn on his LCD TV and surround sound  

stereo receiver, and dim the lights for a perfect Home Cinema experience.

cell
phone

laptop
computer

lcd
tv

digital
cable

DVD
changer

VCR

stereo
receiver

CD
changer

lights

thermostat

fan

home
systems

security
system

0.00.20.40.60.81.0





A/V:  TVs,  DVD  players,  DVRs,  cable  boxes,  audio 
receivers —  you  name  it.  UEI  supplies  Fortune  500 
companies in the consumer electronics, subscription 
broadcasting,  retail,  and  computing  industries  with 
control solutions for today’s vast array of home enter-
tainment devices.

DIGITAL MEDIA: As the proliferation of digital media 
grows exponentially in today’s homes and offices, UEI 
is way ahead of the curve. We’re not only focused on 
the control of digital entertainment, but also on ways 
to help consumers interact with and enjoy their con-
stantly growing digital media collections.

HOME SYSTEMS: Garage doors, ceiling fans, thermo-
stats,  curtains,  security  systems,  lighting;  more  and 
more devices in the home are becoming automated. 
Whether you’re dimming the lights or turning up the 
A/C, universal control has gone beyond the tradition-
al home entertainment system. And UEI is constantly  
integrating its home control solutions for the devices 
that people use every day.

At  Universal  Electronics,  our  commitment  to  connecting  people  with 

technology  drives  our  constant  quest  for  innovation.  As  new  devices  

and  content  continue  to  proliferate  throughout  the  home,  adding  

complexity,  confusion,  and  clutter,  UEI’s  industry-leading  technologies  

will be there to deliver new and better control solutions that are simple 

to use, intuitive, and accessible. No company is better positioned to 

deliver control technology that can truly be called universal.





$ 200

150

100

50

0

revenues
(in millions)

$181

$158

$120

$104

$0.81*

$0.69

$0.65

$0.42 $0.45

$ 1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

 0.0

200

150

101

100

80

156

137

50

0

02

03

04

05

diluted earnings per share

02

03

04

05

patents issued and pending

02

03

04

05

Our markets have strong growth opportunities. The living room 

being  distributed  in  17  countries  worldwide  and  recently  won 

of  today  is  quickly  becoming  the  center  of  the  home  entertain-

the  Residential  Systems  magazine  coveted  RESI  award  for 

ment  network  of  the  future.  Consumer  trends  within  the  home 

“Best Product of the Year” at The CEDIA Expo 2005, the world’s  

show enormous growth potential for our technology:

#1 residential electronics systems industry show. T3, the pre-emi-

• 

 The CE accessories market in the US currently exceeds $2 bil-

nent British gadget and electronics magazine has said, “NevoSL 

lion in annual sales and is expected to grow at an estimated  

may  be  the  best  thing  for  the  home  since  television,”  and  the 

10  percent  annual  rate1.  From  this,  we  estimate  the  current 

product  has  received  extensive  media  coverage  in  publications 

global  CE  accessories  market  to  range  between  $4  and  

ranging from BusinessWeek to PC Magazine to The Robb Report 

$5 billion. 

Home Entertainment.

• 

 Regarding  digital  media  control,  there  are  approximately  

We continue to expand our partnerships with leading companies 

58 million networked homes worldwide, which is expected to 

worldwide.  In  June  2005,  Panasonic  and  UEI  signed  a  two-year 

rise to over 160 million by 2010 2.

agreement  in  which  UEI  will  provide  its  world-class  infrared  (IR) 

• 

 Digital  video  recording  (DVR)  will  reach  130  million  users 

database  and  leading  intellectual  property  portfolio  for  the  re-

worldwide by 2010, up from 17 million users today3.

mote control devices Panasonic manufactures for its CE products. 

• 

 Flat panel TVs are expected to grow more than 38 percent per 

In July, Pioneer Corporation and UEI entered into an agreement 

year over the next 4 years — from 28.1 million units in 2005 to 

to  extend  the  current  license  of  proprietary  connectivity  soft-

over 100 million units in 2009 4. 

ware for use in several of Pioneer’s Pure Vision™ plasma television 

To  our  Shareholders:  This  year  we  are  celebrating  our  20th  anni-

music  services — are  all  driving  demand  for  UEI  technology  

versary  and  another  rewarding  year  for  Universal  Electronics  as  we  

and products.

UEI has pioneered innovative and easy-to-use solutions that are 

meeting the needs driven by these trends. In fact, over the past 

three years we have developed an industry leading patent portfo-

continued our evolution into the wireless control technology leader.

A  year  of  strong  performance.  Net  sales  for  the  year-ended  

lio, technology platform and array of wireless control solutions. As 

December 31, 2005 were $181.3 million, compared to $158.4 mil-

a result, UEI has attracted subscription broadcasting leaders in-

products.  Pioneer  utilizes  UEI’s  extensive  database  of  IR  codes 

to provide consumers with the ability to control traditional home 

devices. In October, Denon selected UEI’s technology for use in 

advanced  remote  controls  for  certain  of  its  high-end  amplifiers 

and tuners to be distributed in the U.S., Europe and Asia. 

lion for the same period last year — a 15 percent increase. 

cluding Comcast®, SKY®, and DirecTV® who have new digital video 

Announced  in  early  2006,  UEI  is  also  powering  Mitsubishi  tele-

In 2005, we continued to serve our core markets well and expe-

rienced increased demand from our subscription broadcasting 

and  consumer  electronics  (CE)  customers.  We  also  witnessed 

Pro forma net income for the full year 2005 was $11.3 million, or 

increased  adoption  of  digital  technology  and  continue  to  see 

$0.81 per diluted share, compared to $9.1 million, or $0.65 per di-

strong  demand  for  our  products  in  the  advanced  set-top  box 

luted share, for the same period last year — a 24 percent growth. 

recorder set-top box deployments, as well as CE giants such as 

visions  with  a  custom  line  of  universal  remote  control  devices,  

Pioneer®,  Panasonic®  and  Denon®  who  have  new  digital  devices 

including  those  that  will  be  bundled  with  the  company’s  high  

like plasma televisions and home theater systems. 

definition Diamond Series televisions.

rollouts. As consumer technology shifts from analog to digital, 

Our strategy of strengthening and diversifying our business has 

In  addition,  with  the  launch  of  NevoSL™  in  July  2005,  we  have 

Delivering advanced consumer solutions for the digital life. The 

new  devices  and  capabilities — including  digital  video  record-

led  to  this  strong  performance.  Looking  forward,  there  are  vast 

opened a whole new segment to UEI’s home networking device 

digital entertainment landscape is in the midst of radical transfor-

ers,  home  networking,  high-definition  televisions  and  digital 

opportunities still in front of us. 

control and digital media control business. This product is already  

mation as technologies are changing and people’s concepts 

*   The 2005 earnings per diluted share in the chart above depict both Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) earnings per diluted share of $0.69 and pro forma earnings per  
diluted share of $0.81. Pro forma earnings per diluted share exclude a $1.6 million write down of a balance due from a former European distributor. Pro forma is included here as management  
believes it provides a more accurate measure of year-over-year financial performance.

1 The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA), 2006
2  The Diffusion Group, “Global Home Network Deployment & Networked Devices” (2004)

3   Strategy Analytics, “Digital Video Recorders: Demand Surges As Mass Market Era Dawns” (2005)
4   Display Search, “Flat Panel Display Market Outlook: From Cyclicality to Maturity” (2006)







of how they interact and use their digital devices are evolving —  

automotive  electronics  manufacturers  such  as  Delphi  to  deliver 

driving  the  need  for  easier  management  of  digital  content  and 

digital entertainment products to connect consumers with their 

control to enhance the user experience.

home-based  digital  media  while  in  the  car.  SimpleWare  Auto 

New home and personal entertainment devices and digital media 

are proliferating in the market, quickly making controlling devices 

and  interacting  with  content  a  major  challenge  for  consumers 

is  available  on  proven  automotive-grade  silicon  platforms  from  

Freescale and Texas Instruments, ensuring fast time-to-market for 

integration on the next generation of in-car entertainment systems.

who want to embrace the new digital life.

Looking  ahead.  As  new  devices  and  technologies  continue  to 

We are excited to be working with leading CE, broadcast, mobile 

and technology companies as we shape the next evolution of the 

digital life with innovative wireless technologies that expand the 

user  experience.  UEI  has  developed  solutions  that  enable  con-

sumers’  seamless  connectivity  and  control  of  their  media  from  

traditional  audio/visual  devices  in  their  living  rooms  to  digital  

media  content  on  personal  computers  in  their  home  offices  to 

transform  the  home  entertainment  environment,  we  remain  at 

the  forefront  of  this  transformation — with  control  technology 

that continues to make this media more accessible. And, as tech-

nology  in  the  CE,  cable  and  satellite,  and  computing  industries  

continues  to  proliferate  and  converge,  and  users  look  for  new 

ways to simplify and enjoy their lives through the use of technol-

ogy, UEI will be the company that helps make this a reality.

mobile media solutions on their handhelds and in their cars.

In closing, I want to thank our board of directors, executive man-

Take SimpleCenter™, for example, our digital media management 

and control software that powers certain advanced media prod-

ucts  for  leading  CE  manufacturers,  enabling  these  devices  to 

agement  team,  dedicated  employees,  worldwide  partners  and 

shareholders for your continued support. Without you, all that we 

have achieved would not have been possible.

manage  and  stream  digital  content  anywhere  in  the  home.  

Sincerely,

Paul Arling, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

SimpleCenter will be bundled with next generation mobile hand-

sets enabling consumers to wirelessly transfer digital music, pic-

tures, and video between their phone and PC as well as use their 

mobile phones to stream digital media throughout their homes.

In Home Control, UEI’s Helix™ universal remote control brings re-

ality to the next generation of convenient home control systems 

by  seamlessly  controlling  not  only  a  vast  array  of  audio/visual  

devices, but also certain types of home environment devices that 

allow consumers to dim the lights, close the curtains and start the 

movie — all with the touch of a button. 

UEI’s  SimpleWare™  Auto  embedded  digital  media  software  is 

powering  solutions  that  enable  automotive  tier-1  suppliers  and 

The  technology  in  our 
homes  speaks  thousands  of 
different  languages.  And  UEI  has 
the ability to decipher them, thanks to 
a database of more than ,000 infrared 
codes that’s growing all the time — to keep 
pace  with  the  new  devices  that  are  intro-
duced into homes around the world every 
day. The result: Anything in an individu-
al’s technology universe that requires 
a  remote  can  be  connected  by  
a  single  control  inter face  
powered by UEI.





 
Business

Risk	Factors

Business

Business of Universal Electronics Inc.

Selected	Consolidated	Financial	Data

Universal	Electronics	Inc.	was	incorporated	under	the	laws	of	Delaware	in	1986	and	began	operations	in	1987.	The	principal	executive	offices	

	Management’s	Discussion	and	Analysis	of		

Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations

	Quantitative	and	Qualitative	Disclosures		

about	Market	Risk

are	located	at	6101	Gateway	Drive,	Cypress,	California	90630.	As	used	herein,	the	terms	“we”,	“us”	and	“our”	refer	to	Universal	Electronics	Inc.	

and	its	subsidiaries	unless	the	context	indicates	to	the	contrary.

Our	operations	are	comprised	of	two	reportable	segments,	Core	Business	and	SimpleDevices.	Our	Core	Business	reportable	segment	

accounted	for	approximately	99%	of	our	net	sales	for	the	twelve	months	ended	December	31,	2005.	We	acquired	our	second	reportable	seg-

Financial	Statements	and	Supplemental	Data

ment,	SimpleDevices,	on	October	1,	2004.

21	

27	

33	

34	

45	

46	

53	

77	

48	 Consolidated	Balance	Sheets

49	 Consolidated	Income	Statements

50	 	Consolidated	Statements	of		
Stockholders’	Equity	

52	 Consolidated	Statements	of	Cash	Flows

Notes	to	Consolidated	Financial	Statements

	Reconciliation	of	Fourth	Quarter	and		

YTD	2005	Pro	Forma,	GAAP	Results

Disaggregated	financial	results	and	assets	by	reportable	segment	can	be	found	in	Note	18	to	the	Consolidated	Financial	Statements.

Additional	information	regarding	UEI	can	be	obtained	at	www.uei.com.	

Core Business Segment

Overview:		In	our	Core	Business	segment	we	have	developed	a	broad	line	of	easy-to-use,	pre-programmed	universal	wireless	control	prod-

ucts	and	audio-video	accessories	that	are	marketed	to	enhance	home	entertainment	systems.

Principal Markets:		The	primary	market	segments	in	our	Core	Business	include	retail,	private	label,	OEMs,	custom	installers,	cable	and	satellite	ser-

vice	providers	and	companies	in	the	computing	industry.	We	believe	that	our	universal	remote	control	database	is	capable	of	controlling	virtually	all	

infrared	remote	(“IR”)	controlled	TVs,	VCRs,	DVD	players,	cable	converters,	CD	players,	audio	components	and	satellite	receivers,	as	well	as	most	other	

IR	controlled	devices	and	home	automation	control	modules	worldwide.

Products and Services: 	We	introduced	our	first	product,	the	One For All®,	in	1987.	Since	then	our	product	lines	have	grown.	Our	family	of	

products	includes	universal	standard	and	touch	screen	remote	controls,	wireless	keyboards,	game	controllers,	antennas,	and	various	audio/

video	accessories,	as	well	as	custom	and	customizable	microcontrollers	that	include	our	library	of	IR	codes,	proprietary	software,	and	digital	

media	control	software.	We	also	earn	revenue	by	licensing	our	library	of	IR	codes	and	proprietary	software.	These	products	cover	a	broad	

spectrum	of	suggested	prices	and	performance	capabilities.

We	provide	subscription	broadcasters,	namely	cable	operators	and	satellite	service	providers	both	domestically	and	internationally	with	

our	wireless	control	devices	and	integrated	circuits,	on	which	our	software	is	embedded,	to	support	the	demand	associated	with	the	deploy-

ment	of	digital	set-top	boxes	that	contain	the	latest	technology	and	features.	We	also	sell	our	universal	wireless	control	devices	and	inte-

grated	circuits,	on	which	our	software	is	embedded,	to	OEMs	that	manufacture	cable	converters	and	satellite	receivers	for	resale	with	their	

products.

We	continue	to	pursue	further	penetration	of	the	more	traditional	consumer	electronics/OEM	markets.	Customers	in	these	markets	gen-

erally	package	our	wireless	control	devices	for	resale	with	their	audio	and	video	home	entertainment	products	(e.g.	TVs,	DVD	and	CD	players,	

VCRs,	personal	digital	media	recorders,	etc.).	We	also	sell	customized	chips,	which	include	our	software	and/or	customized	software	pack-

ages,	to	these	customers.	Growth	in	this	line	of	business	has	been	driven	by	the	proliferation	and	increasing	complexity	of	home	entertain-

2005 Financial Review

78	

Controls	and	Procedures

Forward-Looking Statements: This Annual Report, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, contains statements that may 
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. If the risks 
or uncertainties ever materialize or the assumptions prove incorrect, our results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions. 
All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including but not limited to any projections of revenue, margins, 
expenses, tax provisions, earnings, cash flows, benefit obligations, share repurchases or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future 
operations; any statements concerning expected development or relating to products or services; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements 
regarding pending claims or disputes; any statements of expectation or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Risks, uncertainties and assumptions 
include macroeconomic and geopolitical trends and events; the execution and performance of contracts by customers, suppliers and partners; the challenge of managing asset levels, 
including inventory; the difficulty of aligning expense levels with revenue changes; the outcome of pending legislation and accounting pronouncements; and other risks that are described 
herein, including but not limited to the items discussed in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report, and that are otherwise described from time to time in our Securities and Exchange Com-
mission reports filed after the date of filing this report. We assume no obligation and do not intend to update these forward-looking statements.

20

universal	electronics	2005	annual	report

21

	
	
	
	
By providing our wireless control technology in many forms, including finished products and microcontrollers on which our software is embedded, 

we can meet the needs of our customers, enabling those who manufacture or subcontract their manufacturing requirements to use existing sources 

certain of our proprietary technology to third parties and our One For All® brand name to a third party who in turn sells the products directly to certain 
domestic retailers.

of supply and more easily incorporate our technology.

Beginning in 1986 and continuing today, we have compiled an extensive library that covers nearly 246,000 individual device functions and over 

2,700 individual consumer electronic equipment brand names. Our library is regularly updated with new IR codes used in newly introduced audio and 
video devices. All such IR codes are captured from the original manufacturer’s remote control devices or written specifications to ensure the accuracy 

and integrity of the database.

Outside the United States, we sell our wireless control devices and certain accessories under the One For All® and certain other brand names under 
private labels to retailers, and to other customers, through our international subsidiaries. Third party distributors are utilized in countries where we do 

not have subsidiaries. We also sell our products and/or license our proprietary technology to OEMs, cable operators and satellite service providers 

internationally.

We have seven international subsidiaries; Universal Electronics B.V., established in The Netherlands, One For All GmbH and Ultra Control Con-

Our proprietary software and know-how permit IR codes to be compressed before being loaded into our products. This provides significant cost 

sumer Electronics GmbH, both established in Germany, One for All Iberia S.L., established in Spain, One For All (UK) Ltd., established in the United 

and space efficiencies that enable us to include more codes and features in the memory space of the wireless control device than are included in the 

Kingdom, One For All Argentina S.R.L., established in Argentina, and One For All France S.A.S., established in France.

similarly priced products of our competitors. 

For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, our sales to Comcast Communications, Inc., represented 12.2% and 11.0% of our net sales,  

With today’s rapidly changing technology, upgradeability ensures on-going compatibility with current and future devices. We have developed a 

respectively. No other single customer accounted for 10% or more of our net sales in 2005 and 2004. However, DirecTV and its subcontractors together 

patented technology that provides the capability to easily upgrade the memory of our wireless control devices by adding IR codes from our library 

accounted for 16.6% and 10.4% of our net sales for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

that were not originally included. These upgrade features provide customers with the ability to upgrade our wireless devices remotely using a personal 

computer or telephone, and directly at the factory or service locations. These upgrade options utilize one-way or two-way communication to upgrade 

the wireless device’s codes or data depending on the requirements.

We provide domestic and international consumer support to our various universal remote control marketers, including manufacturers, cable and 

satellite providers, retail distributors, and audio and video original equipment manufacturers through our automated “InterVoice” system. Live agent 

help is also available through certain programs. We continue to review our programs to determine their value in enhancing and improving the sales of 

Each of our wireless control devices is designed to simplify the use of audio, video and other devices. To appeal to the mass market, the number 

our products. As a result of this continued review, some or all of these programs may be modified or discontinued in the future and new programs may 

of buttons is minimized to include only the most popular functions. Our remotes are also designed for ease of set-up. For most of our products, the 

be added.

consumer simply inputs a four-digit code for each video or audio device to be controlled. Another patented ease of use feature we offer in several of 

our products is our user programmable macro key. This feature allows the user to program a sequence of commands onto a single key, to be played 

back each time that key is subsequently pressed.

During 2005, we continued our product innovation by launching several new products based on our two technology platforms developed in 2002: 
Nevo®, an embedded solution that transforms any electronic display (such as a PDA) into a sophisticated and easy-to-use wireless home control and 
automation device; and Kameleon®, a display technology that provides ease of use by illuminating only the keys needed to control each entertainment 
device. We also expanded our line of audio and video accessories including digital antennas, signal boosters, television brackets, and audio and video 

cleaning products.

Wireless networking is one of today’s fastest growing trends. Combining our connectivity software and patent portfolio with Universal Plug-n-Play 
(“UPnP”) standards and the 802.11 wireless networking protocols, we developed our NevoSL® product line. NevoSL®, which began shipping during the 
second quarter of 2005, is a stand alone universal wireless controller that uses Wi-Fi to control the play back or viewing of MP3s, photos, and videos 

stored on a PC, through a media player attached to a home entertainment center. By utilizing the touch screen user interface, customers can select 
play lists, slide shows, or videos to be played via the media player from anywhere within the network’s range. In addition, NevoSL® utilizes infrared 
technology to control virtually all infrared controlled consumer electronic devices, and can also be utilized to control wireless household appliances. 
NevoSL® supports the attainment of our strategic imperative to build our presence as a wireless control technology leader, enabling consumers to 
wirelessly connect, control, and interact within the ever-increasingly complex home.

Methods of Distribution and Customers:  Over the past 18 years, we have developed a broad portfolio of patented technologies and the industry’s 

leading database of home connectivity software that we license to our customers, including many leading Fortune 500 companies. We have also de-
veloped a broad family of products including universal standard and touch screen remote controls, wireless keyboards, game controllers, antennas, 

and various audio/video accessories, as well as custom and customizable microcontrollers that include our library of IR codes, proprietary software, 

and digital media control software.

In the United States, we sell our products and/or license our proprietary technology to cable operators, satellite service providers, private label 

customers, consumer electronics accessory manufacturers and companies in the computing industry for resale under their respective brand names.  

In addition, we sell our wireless control products and license our proprietary technologies to OEMs for use in their products. We have also licensed 

SimpleDevices Segment Description
Overview:  On October 1, 2004, we acquired SimpleDevices Inc. (“SimpleDevices”) for approximately $12.8 million in cash including direct acquisition 

costs, plus a performance-based payment of our unregistered common stock to be paid in the future, if certain financial objectives are achieved.

SimpleDevices, based in San Mateo, California, develops software and firmware solutions that can enable devices such as TVs, set-top boxes, 

stereos, automotive audio systems, cell phones and other consumer electronic products to wirelessly connect and interact with home networks and 

interactive services to deliver digital entertainment and information.

Principal Markets:  SimpleDevices’ primary market segments are OEMs operating in the consumer electronics, automobile, cellular phone, and sub-

scription broadcasting industries.

Products  and  Services:    To  date,  revenues  earned  by  our  SimpleDevices  segment  have  consisted  primarily  of  engineering  services  related  to  the  

development of hardware utilized by our customers to run the SimpleDevices’ software products and customizing our software to customers’ specific 

needs. We anticipate that sales generated as a result of software customization and engineering services will begin to decline as a percentage of total 

sales as software licensing fees and the associated maintenance fees begin to increase as these new products ship. We also anticipate that gross profit 

and gross profit as a percentage of net sales will increase as this shift occurs. Key software products that we have developed include the following:

•  The SimpleWare UPnP Device Enabler –  provides core UPnP implementation support, allowing OEMs to develop devices that interoperate with 
other devices on a network.

• 

SimpleWare Media Server Software Development Kit –  provides a Java content server solution that enables UPnP-compatible devices to communicate 

with the server to navigate the content directory and stream or download content. The SimpleWare Media Server can run on a variety of platforms, includ-

ing network gateways, set top boxes and PCs to serve content to home media devices. In addition, the SimpleWare Media Server Software supports con-

tent enhancement applications designed for SimpleWare-powered devices, including content synchronization, scheduling and music metadata access.

• 

The SimpleWare Connected Media Player Software Development Kit –  Software that enables devices to connect to a home media server and playback 

stored audio and video content. The SimpleWare Connected Media Player SDK supports the emerging UPnP AV standard for connecting with media 

servers in the home. Supporting this standard means that the OEM device can interoperate with media servers running on PCs, routers, gateways and 

dedicated home media servers. Implementation of the software development kit also offers enhanced applications to improve the user experience.

22
22

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

23
23

• 

SimpleCenter Software Application –  provides a PC application for the management, control, and distribution of digital media – music, pictures, and 

movies. This includes a media manager plus a unified platform for connecting and synchronizing media to both home and mobile devices.

•  Automobile Digital Media Player Software Development Kit  –  A complete electrical and firmware design for a wireless Wi-Fi 802.11 digital media 
player for the automobile. When implemented the software enables the Automobile Digital Media Player to awake nightly (or at a scheduled time), 

discover online UPnP media servers, and download new content from the media server onto the onboard hard disc drive (“HDD”). Alternatively, users 

can remove the detachable HDD and connect it to a PC via USB cable. The SimpleWare device software then synchronizes new content between the 

PC and the HDD. Users can also record content from an attached DVD player. One-touch navigation allows users to jump quickly to an artist, album, 

or genre.

Methods of Distribution and Customers:  We sell our services and license our software to OEMs operating in the consumer electronics, automobile, 

cellular phone, and subscription broadcasting industries for use in their products. Services are performed at SimpleDevices, in San Mateo, California. 

Licenses are delivered upon the transfer of a product master or on a per unit basis when the software is loaded onto the OEM’s device.

Raw Materials and Dependence on Suppliers  
We utilize third-party manufacturers and suppliers primarily in Asia and the United States to produce our wireless control products. The number of 

third party manufacturers or suppliers that provided us in excess of 10% of our manufacturing services and/or components was one, two, and three 

for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In 2005, Computime provided 33.9% of our manufacturing services and components. In 2004, Computime and 

Samsung collectively provided 38.7% of our manufacturing services and components. In 2003, Computime, Jetta and Samsung collectively provided 

45% of our manufacturing services and components.

As in the past, we continue to evaluate alternative and additional third-party manufacturers and sources of supply. During 2005, we continued to 

diversify our suppliers and maintain duplicate tooling for certain of our products. This has allowed us to stabilize our source for products and negotiate 

more favorable terms with our suppliers. In addition, where we can, we use standard parts and components, which are available from multiple sources. 

To continue to reduce our dependence on suppliers, we continue to seek additional sources of integrated circuit chips to help reduce the potential for 

manufacturing and shipping delays. In addition, we have included flash microcontroller technology in some of our products. Flash microcontrollers can 

have shorter lead times than standard microcontrollers and may be reprogrammed if necessary, thus potentially reducing excess or obsolete inventory 

exposure.

Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights  
We own a number of United States and foreign patents related to our products and technology, and have filed domestic and foreign applications for 

other patents that are pending. We had a total of 156 issued and pending patents at the end of 2005, an increase from 137 at the end of 2004. The 

remaining life of our patents range from approximately one to eighteen years. We have also obtained copyright registration and claim copyright pro-

tection for certain of our proprietary software and libraries of IR codes. Additionally, the names of most of our products are registered or are being 

registered as trademarks in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and in most of the other countries in which such products are sold. These 

registrations are valid for a variety of terms ranging up to 20 years and may be renewed as long as the trademarks continue to be used and are deemed 

by management to be important to our operations. While we follow the practice of obtaining patent, copyright and trademark registrations on new 

developments whenever advisable, in certain cases, we have elected common law trade secret protection in lieu of obtaining such protection.

Seasonality  
Historically, our business has been influenced by the retail sales cycle, with increased sales in the last half of the year and the largest proportion of 

sales occurring in the last quarter. This pattern is expected to continue and the impact will fluctuate as the sales mix varies between the consumer 

and business categories.

See the “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 22” for further details regarding our quarterly results.

Competition
Our principal competitors in the international retail and private label markets for our wireless controls include Philips, Thomson, and Sony as well as 

various manufacturers of wireless controls in Asia. Our primary competitors in the OEM market are the original equipment manufacturers themselves 

and wireless control manufacturers in Asia. The SimpleDevices’ SimpleWare product lines compete in part with those of Mediabolic, Digital 5, and 

Bridgeco. SimpleDevices’ SimpleCenter products compete with Microsoft, Real Networks, Apple and Musicmatch among others. In the subscrip-
tion broadcasting business line, we compete with various distributors in the United States and several of the larger set-top manufacturers, including  
Motorola and Scientific-Atlanta. The NevoSL® product, which was released in the second quarter of 2005, competes in the custom electronics in-
stallation market against Crestron, AMX, RTI, Universal Remote Control, Philips, Logitec, and many others. We compete in our markets on the basis 

of product quality, product features, price, intellectual property, and customer and consumer support. We believe that we will need to continue to 

introduce new and innovative products to remain competitive and to recruit and retain competent personnel to successfully accomplish our future 

objectives. Certain of our competitors have significantly larger financial, technical, marketing and manufacturing resources than we do, and there can 

be no assurance that we will remain competitive in the future.

Engineering, Research and Development
During 2005, our engineering efforts focused on modifying existing products and technologies to improve features, to lower costs, and to develop 

measures to protect our proprietary technology and general know-how. In addition, we continue to regularly update our library of IR codes to include 

IR codes for new features and devices introduced worldwide. We also continue to explore ways to improve our software to pre-program more codes 

into our memory chips and to simplify the upgrading of our wireless control products.

Also during 2005, our product development efforts focused on new and innovative wireless control and interface solutions resulting in the launch 
of new retail SKUs based on the Kameleon® interface technology. We also broadened our product portfolio with solutions that address emerging 
technology sectors like home media distribution and home automation. These advanced technology development efforts focused on both indus-

try-based standards as well as specific universal extensions that maximize the end user experience utilizing a set of heterogeneous protocols and 

technologies that exist in the modern home today. This environment is driving the need for simplification of these new protocols and devices, since 
they were originally engineered and targeted towards the enterprise customer. We created the Nevo® product offerings to simplify and manage the 
end user’s experience interacting with devices in the home — devices that may be used for a decade or more, including traditional IR based devices, 

and the more complex TCP/IP consumer electronic devices utilizing both open and proprietary protocols.

We also developed technologies aimed at unifying traditional technologies that are encountered within a home, and emerging technologies. 

This allows consumers to deploy our solutions ranging from a simple IR based audio-visual stack to a modern digital media management experience 

allowing access to digital content such as music, pictures and videos.

SimpleDevices’ development was focused on the discovery of new, technologically advanced knowledge and more complete solutions to cus-

tomer needs, the conceptual formulation and design of possible alternatives, as well as the testing of process and product cost improvements. If 

successful, these efforts will enable SimpleDevices to provide customers with reductions in design cycle times, lower costs, and improvements in in-

tegrated circuit design, product quality and overall functional performance. Additionally, these efforts will enable SimpleDevices to further penetrate 

existing markets, pursue new markets effectively and expand the business.

Our  personnel  are  involved  with  various  industry  organizations  and  bodies,  which  are  in  the  process  of  setting  standards  for  infrared,  radio 

frequency, power line, telephone and cable communications and networking in the home. There can be no assurance that any of our research and 
development projects will be successfully completed.

24
24

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

25
25

Our expenditures on engineering, research and development by reportable segments were:

i n   m i l l i o n s 	

Research and development 

Engineering 

2005 

2004 

2003* 

Core	

SDI	

Core	

SDI	

Core	

SDI

$  6.2 

$  0.4 

$  5.7 

$  0.2 

$  4.7 

$  —

3.4 

1.7 

2.9 

0.4 

1.7 

—

Available Information
Our Internet address is www.uei.com. We make available free of charge through the website our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports 

on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably practical after we electronically file such 

reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These reports can be found on our website under the caption “SEC Filings” on the Investor 

page. Investors can also obtain copies of our SEC filings from the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

Total engineering, research and development 

$  9.6 

$  2.1 

$  8.6 

$  0.6 

$  6.4 

$  —

*SimpleDevices was acquired on October 1, 2004, and therefore any engineering, research and development performed during 2003 are not reflected in the table above.

Risk Factors 

Environmental Matters
Many of our products are subject to various federal, state, local and international laws governing chemical substances in products, including laws regulat-

ing the manufacture and distribution of chemical substances and laws restricting the presence of certain substances in electronics products. We could 

incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party damage or personal injury claims, if we were to violate or 

become liable under environmental laws or if our products become non-compliant with environmental laws. We also face increasing complexity in our 

product design and procurement operations as we adjust to new and future requirements relating to the materials composition of our products, including 

the restrictions on lead, cadmium and certain other substances that will apply to specified electronics products put on the market in the European Union 

as of July 1, 2006 (Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive) and the restrictions to be imposed by similar legislation currently proposed in China.

Forward Looking Statements:  We caution that the following important factors, among others (including but not limited to factors discussed below in 

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” as well as those factors discussed elsewhere in this An-

nual Report, or in our other reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission), could affect our actual results and could 

contribute to or cause our actual consolidated results to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. The fac-

tors included here are not exhaustive. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we 

undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made 

or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such 

factors, nor can we assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual 

results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Therefore, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon 

We also could face significant costs and liabilities in connection with product take-back legislation. The European Union (the “EU”) has enacted 

as a prediction of actual future results.

the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive, which makes producers of electrical goods, including computers and printers, financially 

responsible for specified collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of past and future covered products. The deadline for the individual member 

states of the EU to enact the directive in their respective countries was August 13, 2004 (such legislation, together with the directive, the “WEEE Legis-

lation”), although extensions were granted in some countries. Producers participating in the market became financially responsible for implementing 

their responsibilities under the WEEE Legislation beginning in August 2005. Implementation in certain EU member states may be delayed into 2006. 

Similar legislation has been or may be enacted in other jurisdictions, including in the United States, Canada, Mexico, China, and Japan.

While we believe that the forward looking statements made in this report are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual outcome of such 

statements is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including the failure of our markets to continue growing and expanding in the manner 

we anticipated; the failure of our customers to grow and expand as we anticipated; the effects of natural or other events beyond our control, includ-

ing the effect a war or terrorist activities may have on us or the economy; the economic environment’s effect on us and our customers; the growth of, 

acceptance of and the demand for our products and technologies in various markets and geographical regions, including cable, satellite, consumer 

electronics, retail, digital media/technology, CEDIA, interactive TV, automotive, and cellular industries not materializing or growing as we believed; 

We continue to work closely with our contract manufacturing base to move these manufacturers toward becoming Sony Green Partners and we 

our inability to add profitable complementary products which are accepted by the marketplace; our inability to continue to maintain our operating 

already work with several certified Green Partners. Our goal is to provide a choice of three options to our customers: Sony Green compliant, Restriction 

costs at acceptable levels through our cost containment efforts; our inability to realize tax benefits from various tax projects initiated from time to 

of Hazardous Substances Directive compliant, and Non-Green. All Green production processes will be segregated physically from standard produc-

time; our inability to maintain the strength of our balance sheet; our inability to continue selling our products or licensing our technologies at higher 

tion processes to eliminate the possibility of contamination.

We believe we have materially complied with all currently existing international and domestic federal, state and local statutes and regulations 

regarding environmental standards and occupational safety and health matters to which we are subject. During the years ended December 31, 2005, 

2004 and 2003, the amounts incurred in complying with federal, state and local statutes and regulations pertaining to environmental standards and  

or profitable margins; our inability to obtain orders or maintain our order volume with new and existing customers; the possible dilutive effect our 

stock option program may have on our earnings per share and stock price; our inability to continue to obtain adequate quantities of component parts 

or secure adequate factory production capacity on a timely basis; and other factors listed from time to time in our press releases and filings with the 

Securities and Exchange Commission.

occupational  safety  and  health  laws  and  regulations  did  not  materially  affect  our  earnings  or  financial  condition.  However,  future  events,  such  as 

Dependence upon Key Suppliers:  Most of the components used in our products are available from multiple sources. However, we have elected to 

changes in existing laws and regulations or enforcement policies, may give rise to additional compliance costs that could have a material adverse ef-

purchase integrated circuits, used principally in our wireless control products, from two main sources, Freescale and Samsung.

fect upon our capital expenditures, earnings or financial condition.

Employees
At December 31, 2005, we employed 329 employees, of whom 109 work in engineering and research and development, 57 in sales and marketing,  

In addition, during 2005, one source, Computime, provided over ten percent (10%) of our component and finished product inventory purchases. 

Purchases from this significant supplier amounted to $35.5 million, or 33.9%, of total inventory purchases during 2005. Purchases with the same signifi-

cant supplier amounted to $25.5 million, or 28.2%, of total inventory purchases in 2004.

66 in consumer service and support, 35 in operations and warehousing and 62 are executive and administrative staff. None of our employees are 

We have identified alternative sources of supply for these integrated circuits, components, and finished goods, but there can be no assurance 

subject to a collective bargaining agreement or represented by a union. We consider our employee relations to be good.

International Operations
Financial information relating to our international operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 is included in the “Notes to  

that we will be able to continue to obtain these inventory purchases on a timely basis. We generally maintain inventories of our integrated chips, which 

could be used in part to mitigate, but not eliminate, delays resulting from supply interruptions. An extended interruption, shortage or termination in 

the supply of any of the components used in our products, or a reduction in their quality or reliability, or a significant increase in prices of components, 

would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows.

Consolidated Financial Statements-Note 18.”

26
26

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

27
27

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dependence  on  Foreign  Manufacturing:  Third-party  manufacturers  located  in  foreign  countries  manufacture  a  majority  of  our  products.  Our  

that we will be able to obtain or maintain the rights to use proprietary technologies developed by others which are incorporated in our products. Any 

arrangements with our foreign manufacturers are subject to the risks of doing business abroad, such as import duties, trade restrictions, work stop-

failure to anticipate or respond adequately to technological developments and customer requirements, or any significant delays in product develop-

pages, political instability, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, and other factors, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, 

ment or introduction, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

results of operations and cash flows. We believe that the loss of any one or more of our manufacturers would not have a long-term material adverse 

effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows, because numerous other manufacturers are available to fulfill our requirements; however, 

the loss of any of our major manufacturers could adversely affect our business until alternative manufacturing arrangements are secured.

Potential Fluctuations in Quarterly Results:  Historically, our business has been influenced by the retail sales cycle, with increased sales in the last half 

of the year and the largest proportion of sales occurring in the last quarter. Factors such as quarterly variations in financial results could have a material 

adverse affect on the volatility and market price of our common stock.

In addition, the introduction of new products may require significant expenditures for research and development, tooling, manufacturing pro-

cesses, inventory and marketing. In order to achieve high volume production of any new product, we may have to make substantial investments in 

inventory and expand our production capabilities.

Dependence  on  Major  Customers:    The  economic  strength  and  weakness  of  our  worldwide  customers  affect  our  performance.  We  sell  our  wire-

less control products, audio/video accessory products, and proprietary technologies to private label customers, original equipment manufacturers, 

and companies involved in the subscription broadcasting industry. We also supply our products to our wholly owned, non-U.S. subsidiaries and to 

We may from time to time increase our operating expenses to fund greater levels of research and development, sales and marketing activities,  

independent foreign distributors, who in turn distribute our products worldwide, with Europe, Asia, South Africa, Australia, and Argentina currently 

development of new distribution channels, improvements in our operational and financial systems and development of our customer support ca-

representing our principal foreign markets.

pabilities, and to support our efforts to comply with various government regulations. To the extent such expenses precede or are not subsequently 

followed by increased revenues, our business, operating results, financial condition and cash flows will be adversely affected.

During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, we had sales to one customer, Comcast, that amounted to more than 10% of our net sales for 

the respective periods. In addition, for the same periods, we had sales to DirecTV and its sub-contractors, that when combined, exceeded 10% of net 

In addition, we may experience significant fluctuations in future quarterly operating results that may be caused by many other factors, including 

sales. The future loss of these customers or any key customer, either in the United States or abroad, due to their financial weakness, bankruptcy, or our 

demand for our products, introduction or enhancement of products by us and our competitors, the loss or acquisition of any significant customers, 

inability to maintain order volume with these customers, may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

market acceptance of new products, price reductions by us or our competitors, mix of distribution channels through which our products are sold, level 

of product returns, mix of customers and products sold, component pricing, mix of international and domestic revenues, foreign currency exchange 

rate fluctuations and general economic conditions. In addition, as a strategic response to changes in the competitive environment, we may from time 

to time make certain pricing or marketing decisions or acquisitions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or 

financial condition. As a result, we believe period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not 

be relied upon as an indication of future performance.

SimpleDevices Inc.:  On October 1, 2004, we acquired SimpleDevices Inc. for approximately $12.8 million in cash including direct acquisition costs, plus 

a performance-based payment of our unregistered common stock to be paid in the future, if certain financial objectives are achieved. SimpleDevices, 

based in San Mateo, California, develops software and firmware solutions that can enable devices such as TVs, set-top boxes, stereos, automotive au-

dio systems and other consumer electronic products to wirelessly connect and interact with home networks and interactive services to deliver digital 

entertainment and information. The success of SimpleDevices will depend upon a variety of factors including, (i) our ability to bring SimpleDevices’ 

products to market in a timely and cost effective manner; (ii) the market accepting SimpleDevices’ products and technology to the extent anticipated 

Due to all of the foregoing factors, it is likely that in some future quarters our operating results will be below the expectations of public market  

by us; (iii) our ability to integrate SimpleDevices’ products and business into our own product offerings and business in a cost effective manner; and 

analysts and investors. If this happens the price of our common stock will likely be materially adversely affected.

(iv) our ability to control the overall costs associated with SimpleDevices in the manner we anticipate. The failure of any of these items could have a 

Dependence on Consumer Preference:  We are susceptible to fluctuations in our business based upon consumer demand for our products. In addi-

material effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

tion, we cannot guarantee that increases in demand for our products associated with increases in the deployment of new technology will continue. We 

We may enter into contracts to perform customization of our software on behalf of a customer, where the agreement’s terms allow an initial trial 

believe that our success depends on our ability to anticipate, gauge and respond to fluctuations in consumer preferences. However, it is impossible 

period, after which the customer has the option to purchase a license for the finished product at a contracted rate (also known as a “try and buy” 

to predict with complete accuracy the occurrence and effect of fluctuations in consumer demand over a products life cycle. Moreover, we caution that 

agreement). There can be no assurance that these products will achieve customer acceptance. In addition, management may enter into contracts to 

any growth in revenues that we achieve may be transitory and should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance.

provide a software product to a reseller for a nominal licensing fee, while making an optional premium upgrade available to the end user for an ad-

Demand for Consumer Service and Support:  We have continually provided domestic and international consumer service and support to our custom-

ers to add overall value and to help differentiate us from our competitors. We continually review our service and support group and are marketing our 

expertise in this area to other potential customers. There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract new customers in the future.

In addition, Our Kameleon® and Nevo® line of products have more features and are more complex than our older products and therefore may 
require more end-user technical support. For our Nevo® product line, we currently rely, and intend to continue to rely, on the distributor or dealers to 
provide first line technical support to the end-users. However, we provide the second level of technical support for bug fixes and other issues at no 
additional charge. Therefore, as the mix of our products includes Nevo® and other more complex product lines, support costs could increase, which 
would have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Dependence Upon Timely Product Introduction:  Our ability to remain competitive in the wireless control and audio/video accessory products market 

will depend considerably upon our ability to successfully identify new product opportunities, as well as developing and introducing these products 

and enhancements on a timely and cost effective basis. There can be no assurance that we will be successful at developing and marketing new prod-

ucts or enhancing our existing products, or that these new or enhanced products will achieve consumer acceptance and, if achieved, will sustain that  

acceptance. In addition, there can be no assurance that products developed by others will not render our products non-competitive or obsolete or 

ditional charge. It is impossible to predict with complete accuracy the occurrence and effect of fluctuations in consumer demand for these premium 

upgrades over a products life cycle.

Internal Investments:  During 2004 we hired a small number of personnel to develop and market additional products that are part of the Nevo® plat-
form as well as products that are based on the Zigbee, Zensys and other radio frequency technology. Even after these hires, we continue to use outside  

resources to assist us in the development of these products. While we believe that such outside services should continue to be available to us, in the 

event that such outside services cease being available, the development of these products could be substantially delayed.

Competition: The wireless control industry is characterized by intense competition based primarily on product availability, price, speed of delivery, 

ability to tailor specific solutions to customer needs, quality, and depth of product lines. Our competition is fragmented across our products, and, 

accordingly, we do not compete with any one company across all product lines. We compete with a variety of entities, some of which have greater 

financial and other resources. Our ability to remain competitive in this industry depends in part on our ability to successfully identify new product op-

portunities, develop and introduce new products and enhancements on a timely and cost effective basis, as well as our ability to successfully identify 

and enter into strategic alliances with entities doing business within the industries we serve. There can be no assurance that our product offerings will 

be, and/or remain, competitive or that strategic alliances, if any, will achieve the type, extent, and amount of success or business that we expect them 

28
28

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

29
29

to achieve – in that sales of our products and technology may not occur or grow in the manner expected by us, and thus we may not recoup costs 

General Economic Conditions:  General economic conditions, both domestic and international, have an impact on our business and financial results. 

incurred in the research and development of these products as quickly as we expect or at all.

Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights:  The procedures by which we identify, document and file for patent, trademark, and copyright protection are 

based solely on engineering and management judgment, with no assurance that a specific filing will be issued, or if issued, will deliver any lasting value 

The global economy remains uncertain. As a result, individuals and companies may delay or reduce expenditures. Weak global economic conditions 

and/or softness in the consumer, subscription broadcasting, and/or OEM channels could result in lower demand for our products, resulting in lower 

sales, earnings and cash flows.

to us. Because of the rapid innovation of products and technologies that is characteristic of our industry, there is no assurance that rights granted 

Environmental Matters:  Every year we learn of changes in the laws and regulations regarding our environment. With the recent passage of the Eu-

under any patent will provide competitive advantages to us or will be adequate to safeguard and maintain our proprietary rights. Moreover, the laws 

ropean Union’s Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive, and the restrictions to be imposed by similar legislation currently proposed in China, 

of certain countries in which our products are or may be manufactured or sold may not offer protection on such products and associated intellectual 

and the European Union’s Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive, we could face significant costs and liabilities in complying with these 

property to the same extent that the U.S. legal system may offer.

and new laws and regulations or enforcement policies that could have a material adverse effect upon our capital expenditures, earnings or financial 

In our opinion, our intellectual property holdings as well as our engineering, production, and marketing skills and the experience of our person-

condition.

nel are of equal importance to our market position. We further believe that none of our businesses are materially dependent upon any single patent, 

Terrorism and Acts of War:  Terrorism and acts of war (wherever occurring throughout the world) may cause damage or disruption to us, our employ-

copyright, trademark, or trade secret.

Some of our products include or use technology and/or components of third parties. While it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew  

ees, facilities, partners, suppliers, distributors, resellers or customers, which could significantly impact our revenues, expenses and financial condition. 

We are predominately uninsured for losses and interruptions caused by terrorist acts and acts of war.

licenses relating to various aspects of such products, we believe that, based upon past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could 

Leased Property:  We lease all of the properties used in our business. We can give no assurance that we will enter into new or renewal leases, or that, 

be obtained on commercially reasonable terms; however, there is no guarantee that such licenses could be obtained on such terms or at all. Because 

if entered into, the new lease terms will be similar to the existing terms or that the terms of any such new or renewal leases will not have a significant 

of technological changes in the wireless and home control industry, current extensive patent coverage, and the rapid rate of issuance of new patents, 

and material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

it is possible certain components of our products and business methods may unknowingly infringe upon the patents of others.

Technology Changes in Wireless Control:  We currently derive substantial revenue from the sale of wireless remote controls based on infrared (“IR”) 

Potential for Litigation:  As is typical in our industry and for the nature and kind of business in which we are engaged, from time to time various claims, 

technology.  Other  control  technologies  exist  or  could  be  developed  that  could  compete  with  IR.  In  addition,  we  develop  and  maintain  our  own 

charges and litigation are asserted or commenced by third parties against us or by us against third parties, arising from or related to product liability, 

database of IR and RF codes. There are several competing IR and RF libraries offered by companies that we compete with in the marketplace. The 

infringement of patent or other intellectual property rights, breach of warranty, contractual relations or employee relations. The amounts claimed may 

advantage that we may have compared to our competitors is difficult to measure. If other wireless control technology gains acceptance and starts to 

be substantial, but they may not bear any reasonable relationship to the merits of the claims or the extent of any real risk of court awards assessed 

be integrated into home electronics devices currently controlled through our IR remote controllers, demand for our products may decrease, resulting 

against us or in our favor.

in decreased revenue, earnings and cash flow.

Risks of Conducting Business Internationally:  The risks of doing business internationally could adversely affect our sales, operations, earnings and 

Failure to Recruit, Hire, and Retain Key Personnel Would Harm Our Ability to Grow and Meet Key Objectives:  Our ability to achieve growth in the 

cash flows due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to:

• 

 changes in a country’s or region’s economic or political conditions, including inflation, recession, interest rate fluctuations and actual or antici-
pated military conflicts;

• 

 currency fluctuations affecting sales, particularly in the Euro and British Pound, which contribute to variations in sales of products and services in 

impacted jurisdictions and also affect our reported results expressed in U.S. dollars;

• 

 currency fluctuations affecting costs, particularly the Euro, British Pound and the Chinese Yuan, which contribute to variances in costs in impacted 

jurisdictions and also affect our reported results expressed in U.S. dollars;

longer accounts receivable cycles and financial instability among customers;

trade regulations and procedures and actions affecting production, pricing and marketing of products;

local labor conditions, customs, and regulations; 

changes in the regulatory or legal environment; 

• 

• 

• 

• 

•  differing technology standards or customer requirements; 

• 

 import, export or other business licensing requirements or requirements relating to making foreign direct investments, which could affect our 

ability to obtain favorable terms for components or lead to penalties or restrictions;

•  difficulties associated with repatriating cash generated or held abroad in a tax-efficient manner and changes in tax laws;

• 

• 

fluctuations in freight costs and disruptions at important geographic points of exit and entry; and

natural and medical disasters. 

future will depend, in part, on our success at recruiting, hiring, and retaining highly skilled engineering, managerial, sales, and marketing personnel. 

In addition, our corporate office, including our advance technology engineering group, is based in Southern California. The high cost of living in 

Southern California makes it difficult to attract talent from outside the region and may also put pressure on overall employment related expense. The 

inability to recruit, hire, and retain qualified personnel in a timely manner, or the loss of any key personnel, could make it difficult to meet key objec-

tives, such as timely and effective product introductions.

Credit Facility:  Our current credit facility is set to expire in September 2006 and we are in discussions with our bank to extend this facility. Presently, 

we have no borrowings under this facility; however, we cannot make any assurances that we will not need to borrow amounts under this facility or that 

this facility will be extended and thus available to us in the event we need to borrow. If this or any credit facility is not available to us at a time when we 

need to borrow, we would have to use our cash reserves which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings, cash flow and financial position.

Change in Competition and Pricing:  We rely on third-party manufacturers to build our universal wireless control products, based on our extensive IR 

code library and patented technology. Price is always an issue in winning and retaining business. If customers become increasingly price sensitive, 

new competition could arise from manufacturers who decide to go into direct competition with us or from current competitors who perform their own 

manufacturing. If such a trend develops, we could experience downward pressure on our pricing or lose sales, which could have a material adverse 

effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Transportation Costs; Impact of Oil Prices:  We ship products from our foreign manufacturers via ocean and air transport. It is sometimes difficult to 

forecast swings in demand and, as a result, products may be shipped via air which is more costly than ocean shipments. Often, we cannot recover the 

increased cost of airfreight from our customers. The inability to predict swings in demand can increase the cost of freight which could have a material 

adverse effect on our product margins.

30
30

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

31
31

In addition, we have an exposure to oil prices in two forms. The first is in the prices of the oil-based materials that we use in our products, which are 

primarily the plastics and other components that we include in our finished products. The second is in the cost of delivery and freight, which would be 

passed on by the carriers that we use in the form of higher rates. We record freight-in as a cost of sales, and freight-out in operating expenses. Rising 

oil prices may have an adverse effect on cost of sales and operating expenses.

Our Proprietary Technologies May Include Design or Performance Defects and May Not Achieve Their Intended Results:  We produce highly complex 

products that incorporate leading-edge technology, including hardware, firmware, and software. Firmware and software may contain bugs that can 

unexpectedly interfere with operations. There can be no assurance that our testing programs will detect all defects in individual products or defects 

that could affect numerous shipments. The presence of defects may harm customer satisfaction, reduce sales opportunities, or increase returns. An 

inability to cure or repair a product defect could result in the failure of a product line, temporary or permanent withdrawal from a product or market, 

damage to our reputation, increased inventory costs, or product reengineering expenses, any of which could have a material impact on our revenues, 

margins and net income.

Acquisitions:  We may, from time to time, pursue the acquisition of businesses, products or technologies that complement or expand our existing op-

erations, including those that could be material in size and scope. Acquisitions involve many risks, including the diversion of management’s attention 

away from day-to-day operations. There is also the risk that we will not be able to successfully assimilate the operations, personnel, customer base, 

products or technologies of an acquired business. Such acquisitions could also have adverse short-term effects on our operating results, and could 

result in dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt, and the loss of key employees. In addition, business acquisitions must be ac-

counted for as purchases and, because most technology-related acquisitions involve the purchase of significant intangible assets, these acquisitions 

typically result in substantial amortization charges and charges for acquired research and development projects, which could have a material adverse 

effect on our results of operations. There can be no assurance that any such acquisitions will occur or, if such acquisitions do occur, that the acquired 

businesses, customer bases, products or technologies will generate sufficient revenue to offset the associated costs or effects.

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction with “Management’s 

Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” in order to under-

stand further the factors that may affect the comparability of the financial data presented below.

in thousands, except per share data 

2005 

2004 

2003 

2002 

2001

Year	Ended	December	31,	

Net sales 

Operating income 

Net income 

Earnings per share:

Basic 

Diluted 

Shares used in calculating earnings per share: 

Basic 

Diluted 

Gross margin 

Operating margin 

Selling, general, administrative, research and 

development expenses as a % of net sales 

Net income as a % of net sales 

Return on average assets 

Working capital 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

181,349 

$  158,380 

11,677 

9,701 

0.72 

0.69 

13,462 

13,992 

37.0% 

6.4% 

30.6% 

5.4% 

6.8% 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

13,540 

9,114 

0.67 

0.65 

13,567 

14,100 

38.9% 

8.6% 

30.3% 

5.8% 

6.8% 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

120,468 

8,573 

6,267 

0.46 

0.45 

13,703 

14,007 

38.4% 

7.1% 

31.3% 

5.2% 

5.5% 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

103,891 

$  119,030

6,981 

$  16,009

5,939 

$  11,286

0.43 

0.42 

$ 

$ 

0.82

0.78

13,790 

14,163 

40.1% 

6.7% 

33.4% 

5.7% 

6.1% 

13,844

14,523

41.2%

13.4%

27.8%

9.5%

12.0%

$ 

77,201 

$ 

75,081 

$ 

82,191 

$ 

71,457 

$  67,422

Ratio of current assets to current liabilities 

2.8 

3.1 

3.7 

5.3 

5.5

Total assets 

Cash and cash equivalents 

Short-term investments 

Long-term debt 

Stockholders’ equity 

Book value per share (a) 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

146,319 

$  140,400 

43,641 

$ 

42,472 

$ 

$ 

126,167 

58,481 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

103,292 

$  103,881 

7.63 

$ 

7.66 

$ 

$ 

95,171 

6.89 

24.6% 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

100,016 

$  94,705

18,064 

$  14,170

22,500 

$  20,100

41 

$ 

104

83,237 

$  79,702

6.17 

$ 

5.78

16.8% 

15.8%

Ratio of liabilities to liabilities and stockholders’ equity 

29.4% 

26.0% 

(a)Book value per share is defined as stockholders’ equity divided by common shares issued, less treasury stock.

32
32

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

33
33

A factor that affected the comparability of information between 2002 and 2001 was our implementation of Statement of Financial Accounting Stan-

dards (“SFAS”) No. 142 on January 1, 2002, which requires that goodwill no longer be amortized. In addition, the comparability of 2005 and 2004 with 

prior years is affected by the acquisition of SimpleDevices Inc. in the fourth quarter of 2004 (See Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements).

		
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

We have developed a broad line of pre-programmed universal wireless control products and audio-video accessories that are marketed to enhance 

home  entertainment  systems.  Our  channels  of  distribution  include  international  retail,  U.S.  retail,  private  label,  OEMs,  cable  and  satellite  service 

providers, CEDIA, and companies in the computing industry. We believe that our universal remote control database contains device codes that are 
capable of controlling virtually all infrared remote (“IR”) controlled TVs, VCRs, DVD players, cable converters, CD players, audio components and satel-

lite receivers, as well as most other infrared remote controlled devices worldwide.

Beginning in 1986 and continuing today, we have compiled an extensive library that cover nearly 246,000 individual device functions and over 

2,700 individual consumer electronic equipment brand names. Our library is regularly updated with new IR codes used in newly introduced video and 

data and other known factors. The provision recorded for estimated sales returns and allowances is deducted from gross sales to arrive at net sales in 

the period the related revenue is recorded. Sales allowances reduce gross accounts receivable to arrive at accounts receivable, net in the same period 

the related receivable is recorded. We have no obligations after delivery of our products other than the associated warranties.

When a sales arrangement contains multiple elements, such as software products, licenses and/or services, we allocate revenue to each element 

based on its relative fair value. The fair values for the multiple elements are determined based on vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), or the 

price charged when the element is sold separately. The residual method is utilized when VSOE exists for all the undelivered elements, but not for the 

delivered element. This is performed by allocating revenue to the undelivered elements (that have VSOE) and the residual revenue to the delivered 

elements. When the fair value for an undelivered element cannot be determined, we defer revenue for the delivered elements until the undelivered 

elements are delivered. We limit the amount of revenue recognition for delivered elements to the amount that is not contingent on the future delivery 

audio devices. All such IR codes are captured from the original manufacturer’s remote control devices or manufacturer’s specifications to ensure the 

of products or services or subject to customer-specified return or refund privileges.

accuracy and integrity of the database. We have also developed patented technologies that provide the capability to easily upgrade the memory of 

the wireless control device by adding IR codes from the library that were not originally included.

Beginning in 2002, we began selling our Nevo® 1.0 software embedded on our chip. Nevo 2.0® was launched in July of 2004. Both these products 
were featured on a series of Hewlett Packard Personal Digital Assistants (PDA), which reached their end of life during the third quarter of 2005. Building 
on this platform, we used some components of the Nevo 2.0® technology in a new product named “NevoSL”® which we began to ship in the second 
quarter of the 2005. NevoSL® is a universal controller that delivers complete audio, visual and Wi-Fi digital media control for the networked home.

From October 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, we acquired over 99% of the outstanding shares of SimpleDevices, Inc. (“SimpleDevices”) 

for approximately $12.8 million in cash, including direct acquisition costs, plus a performance-based payment of our unregistered common stock to 

be paid in the first quarter of 2007 if certain financial objectives are achieved. The performance-based payment has not been reflected as part of the 

purchase price as of December 31, 2005, since we believe that it is not probable that the performance metrics will be met.

The value we received from this acquisition relates primarily to SimpleDevices’ unique capabilities, as well as its complete and in-process tech-

nology. SimpleDevices has developed connected-device technology solutions that link the home computer and the Internet to existing consumer 

electronic devices in the home and car. The company provides UPnP-compatible software to transform common home devices into “connected” 

devices — that is, devices that can find, control and share entertainment media across a home network. UPnP is an architecture for pervasive peer-to-

peer network connectivity of intelligent appliances, wireless devices, and PCs of all form factors. It is designed to bring standards-based connectivity 

to ad-hoc or unmanaged networks whether in the home, in a small business, public spaces, or attached to the Internet. UPnP is a distributed, open 

networking architecture that leverages TCP/IP and the Web technologies to enable seamless proximity networking in addition to control and data 

transfer among networked devices in the home, office, and public spaces.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to 

make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of 

the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our es-

timates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts, warranties, inventory valu-

ation, business combination purchase price allocations, our review for impairment of long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill, and income 

taxes. Actual results may differ from the estimates, and these estimates may be adjusted as more information becomes available and any adjustment 

could be significant.

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consoli-

dated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition:  We recognize revenue on the sale of products when delivery has occurred, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, 

the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. We record a provision for estimated sales returns and allowances on 

product sales in the same period as the related revenues are recorded. These estimates are based on historical sales returns, analysis of credit memo 

We account for revenue under software  licensing arrangements involving  significant production, modification  or customization  of software in 

accordance with SOP 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts.” We recognize revenue and 

profit as work progresses on long-term, fixed price contracts using the percentage-of-completion method. When applying the percentage-of-com-

pletion method, we rely on estimates of total expected contract revenue and labor hours. We follow this method because reasonably dependable 

estimates of the revenue and labor applicable to various stages of a contract can be made. Recognized revenue and profit are subject to revisions as 

the contract progresses to completion. Revisions to revenue and profit estimates are charged to income in the period in which the facts that give rise 

to the revision become known, and losses are accrued when identified.

Accounts Receivable: We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make their 

required payments. Specifically, we analyze historical bad debts, customer credit profiles, current economic trends and changes in customer payment 

behavior when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, result-

ing in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances might be required.

Inventories: Our inventories consist of wireless control devices, including universal remote controls, wireless keyboards, antennas, and related com-

ponent parts (including integrated circuits) and are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. We 

carry inventory in amounts necessary to satisfy our customers’ inventory requirements on a timely basis. New product innovations and technological 

advances may shorten a given product’s life cycle. We continually monitor our inventory status to control inventory levels and dispose of any excess or 

obsolete inventories on hand. We write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence and unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between 

the inventory’s cost and its estimated market value based upon our best estimates about future demand and market conditions. If actual market condi-

tions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

Business Combinations: We are required to allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets and the liabilities 

assumed, as well as in-process research and development (“IPR&D”), based on their estimated fair values. The total purchase price of SimpleDevices, 

which was approximately $12.8 million, including direct acquisition costs, has been allocated to the net assets acquired based on estimated fair val-

ues. Such valuations require management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. The significant 

purchased intangible assets recorded by us include customer contracts, developed and core technology and trade names.

Critical estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include but are not limited to:

• 

• 

future free cash flow from customer contracts, customer lists, distribution agreements, acquired developed technologies and patents;

expected costs to develop IPR&D into commercially viable products and cash flows from the products once they are completed;

•  brand awareness and market position, as well as assumptions about the period of time the brand will continue to be used in our product portfolio; and

•  discount rates utilized in discounted cash flow models. 

Our estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as 

a result, actual results may differ from estimates.

34
34

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

35
35

Valuation  of  Long-Lived Assets and Intangible  Assets:  We assess long-lived and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in 

The provision for tax liabilities involves evaluations and judgments of uncertainties in the interpretation of complex tax regulations by various taxing 

circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered important which could trigger an impairment review if 

authorities. In situations involving tax related uncertainties, we provide for deferred tax liabilities when we believe such liabilities are probable. Actual 

significant include the following:

results could differ from our estimates.

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results;

changes in the manner of use of the assets; 

changes in the strategy of our overall business; 

negative industry or economic trends; 

a decline in our stock price for a sustained period; and 

a variance between our market capitalization relative to net book value.

When we determine that the carrying value of a long-lived asset or an intangible asset may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one 

or more of the above indicators of impairment we perform an impairment review. If the carrying value of the asset is larger than the undiscounted cash 

flows, the asset is impaired. We measure an impairment based on the projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by 

our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. In assessing the recoverability, we must make assumptions 

regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets. If these estimates or their related assump-

tions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges.

Goodwill:  We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill as of December 31 of each year and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances 

change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include, but 

are not limited to: (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (2) unanticipated competition, or (3) an adverse action or as-

sessment by a regulator.

When performing the impairment review, we determine the carrying amount of each reporting unit by assigning assets and liabilities, including 

the existing goodwill, to those reporting units. A reporting unit is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred 

to as a component). A component of an operating segment is deemed a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete 

financial information is available, and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component.

To evaluate whether goodwill is impaired, we compare the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit’s 

carrying amount, including goodwill. We determine the fair value of each reporting unit using the present value of expected future cash flows for that 

reporting unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the amount of the impairment loss must be measured.

The impairment loss would be calculated by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill to its carrying amount. In calculating the 

implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the other assets and liabilities of that unit based 

on their fair values. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amount assigned to its other assets and liabilities is the implied fair value 

of goodwill. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.

Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our results of operations expressed as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated.

Net sales 

Cost of sales 

Gross profit 

Research and development expenses 

Selling, general and administrative expenses 

Operating income 

Interest income 

Other income (expense), net 

Income before income taxes 

Provision for income taxes 

Net income 

Year	Ended	December	31,	

2005 

2004 

2003

100.0% 

100.0% 

100.0%

63.0 

37.0 

3.6 

27.0 

6.4 

0.5 

1.2 

8.1 

2.7 

5.4% 

61.1 

38.9 

3.7 

26.6 

8.6 

0.5 

(0.4) 

8.7 

2.9 

5.8% 

61.6

38.4

3.9

27.4

7.1

0.5

0.3

7.9

2.7

5.2%

Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2004
Consolidated:  Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 were $181.3 million, an increase of 15% compared to $158.4 million for the same period 

last year. Net income for 2005 was $9.7 million or $0.72 per share (basic) and $0.69 per share (diluted) compared to $9.1 million or $0.67 per share (basic) 

and $0.65 per share (diluted) for 2004.

Net sales: 

  Business 

  Consumer 

Total net sales 

2005 

2004

$	(millions)	

%	of	total	

$	(millions)	

%	of	total

$  126.2 

55.1 

$  181.3 

69.6% 

30.4% 

$ 

97.6   

60.8   

61.6%

38.4%

100.0% 

$  158.4   

100.0%

Income Taxes:  As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we estimate our income taxes in each of the taxing jurisdic-

Net sales in our Business lines (subscription broadcasting, OEM, and computing companies) were approximately 70% of net sales for 2005 com-

tions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax expense together with assessing any temporary differences resulting 

pared to 62% for 2004. Net sales in our business lines for 2005 increased by 29% to $126.2 million from $97.6 million in 2004. This increase in sales resulted 

from the different treatment of certain items, such as the timing for recognizing expenses, for tax and financial reporting purposes. These differences 

primarily from an increase in the volume of remote control sales, which was partially offset by lower prices. The increase in remote control sales volume 

may result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheet.

We are required to assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets, which include net operating loss carryforwards and temporary differences 

that are expected to be deductible in future years, will be recoverable from future taxable income or other tax planning strategies. If recovery is not 

likely, we must provide a valuation allowance based on our estimates of future taxable income in the various taxing jurisdictions and the amount of 

deferred taxes that are ultimately realizable.

was attributable to the continued deployment of advanced function set-top boxes by the service operators and market share gains with a few key sub-

scription broadcasting customers. These advanced functions include digital video recording (“DVR”), video-on-demand (“VOD”), and high definition 

television (“HDTV”). Royalty revenue (revenue earned through licensing of intellectual property) recognized in 2005 attributable to agreements signed 

in the fourth quarter of 2004 of $1.5 million and the acquisition of SimpleDevices also contributed to the increase in net sales. The acquisition of Sim-

pleDevices added net sales of $0.7 million and 1% to the Business category net sales growth. We expect that the deployment of the advanced function 

set-top boxes by the service operators will continue into the foreseeable future as penetration for each of the functions cited continues to increase. As 

a result, we expect Business category revenue to range between $150 – $160 million in 2006.

36
36

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

37
37

		
	
	
	
 
 
 
  
 
		
	
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales in our Consumer lines (One For All® international retail, private label, custom installers, and direct import) were approximately 30% of 
net sales for 2005 compared to 38% for 2004. Net sales in our consumer lines for 2005 decreased by 9% to $55.1 million, from $60.8 million in 2004. The 

SimpleDevices:  SimpleDevices recorded net sales of $1.5 million and a pretax loss of $4.0 million in 2005. Sales consisted primarily of engineering 

services related to the development of hardware utilized by SimpleDevices’ customers to run the SimplePlatforms software. In addition, SimpleDev-

decrease in sales resulted primarily from a decrease in European retail sales, which were down 11% to $43.0 million in 2005 from $47.6 million in 2004. 

ices also generated revenue by customizing its software products to customer’s specific needs. Sales attributable to SimpleDevices are included in 

This decrease was primarily attributable to lower volumes in the U.K. market and the weakening of both the Euro and the British Pound compared 

our Business category when we discuss consolidated results. The results of SimpleDevices have been included since the date of acquisition and are 

to the U.S. Dollar. The impact of the weakening currencies resulted in a decrease in net sales of approximately $0.6 million. Excluding the negative 

described below.

foreign exchange impact, European retail sales decreased $4.0 million compared to 2004. Private label sales decreased by 41% to $4.0 million in 2005 
from $6.8 million in 2004. This was due to a decline in the volume of Kameleon® sales. Kameleon® sales declined during 2005 compared to 2004 as a 
result of fewer new product introductions. United States direct import licensing and product revenues for 2005 decreased by 21% to $2.5 million from 
$3.2 million in 2004 due to a decline in the volume of Kameleon® sales. Partially offsetting these decreases was our entry into the CEDIA market, in 
the second quarter of 2005. This added net sales of $2.5 million and 5% to the Consumer category net sales growth as compared to 2004. We expect 

Consumer category revenue to range between $55 — $65 million in 2006.

Gross profit for 2005 was $67.1 million compared to $61.6 million for 2004. Gross profit as a percent of sales for 2005 was 37.0% compared to 38.9% for 

2004. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was primarily attributable to subscription broadcast sales, which generally have a lower 

gross profit rate as compared to our other sales, representing a larger percentage of our total business. The impact of this change in mix was a 1.8%  

reduction in the gross profit rate. Gross profit was also negatively impacted by an additional $1.9 million of freight expense recorded in 2005 as com-

pared to 2004. A portion of this increase in freight relates to sales volume; however, the majority of the increase is due to a change in rate. In 2005, there 

was an increase in the percentage of units that were shipped by air versus ocean as well as a mix shift towards subscription broadcast sales. Freight 

contributed to a 0.8% reduction in the gross profit rate. Duties increased $0.6 million, as a larger percentage of units were imported. The increase in 

duty expense contributed to a 0.3% reduction in the gross profit rate. Gross profit was also negatively impacted by the weakening of both the Euro 

and British Pound compared to the U.S. Dollar, which resulted in a decrease in gross profit of approximately $0.6 million and a reduction of 0.2% in the 

gross profit rate. All other product costs, which include warranty expense, quality assurance expense, and component costs, increased $0.7 million 

and reduced the gross profit rate by 0.4%. Partially offsetting these decreases in the gross profit rate was a reduction in inventory scrap expense of 

$1.1 million. This reduction added 0.9% to the gross profit rate. In addition, royalty expense declined $0.7 million due to the decline in the volume of 
Kameleon® sales, which added 0.7% to the gross profit rate.

Research and development expenses increased 12% from $5.9 million in 2004 to $6.6 million in 2005. The increase is related to our continued expansion 
of the Nevo® platform and development efforts taking place at SimpleDevices. Partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in the development 
of audio-video accessories for sale in our retail channel. We expect research and development expense to remain near current levels for the full year 2006.

•  Gross profit was $0.1 million, or 6.4% of sales. 

•  Research and development expenses were $0.4 million, which consisted primarily of internal and external development efforts related to Sim-
pleDevices’ core software product.

• 

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $3.7 million, which consisted primarily of engineering payroll and benefits costs as well as out-

side product development costs.

We anticipate that sales generated as a result of software customization and engineering services will begin to decline as a percent of total sales 

as software licensing fees and the associated maintenance fees begin to increase. We also anticipate that gross profit and gross profit as a percent of 

net sales will increase as this shift occurs.

Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003
Consolidated:  Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 were $158.4 million, an increase of 31% compared to $120.5 million for the year ended 

December 31, 2003. Net income for 2004 was $9.1 million or $0.67 per share (basic) and $0.65 per share (diluted) compared to $6.3 million or $0.46 per 

share (basic) and $0.45 per share (diluted) for 2003.

Net sales: 

  Business 

  Consumer 

Total net sales 

2004 

2003

$	(millions)	

%	of	total	

$	(millions)	

%	of	total

$ 

97.6 

60.8 

61.6% 

38.4% 

$ 

69.7 

  57.8%

50.8 

  42.2%

$  158.4 

  100.0% 

$  120.5 

 100.0%

Net  sales  in  our  business  lines  (subscription  broadcasting,  OEM,  and  computing  companies)  were  approximately  62%  of  net  sales  for  2004  com-

pared to 58% for 2003. Net sales in our business lines for 2004 increased by 40% to $97.6 million from $69.7 million in 2003. Net sales to subscription 

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 16% from $42.2 million in 2004 to $48.9 million in 2005. Approximately $2.8 million of this 

broadcasting service providers and OEMs for 2004 increased by 40% to $96.6 million from $68.9 million in 2003. The increase in sales resulted from 

increase was attributable to the acquisition of SimpleDevices, $2.0 million to payroll and benefits, $1.9 million to bad debt expense, which included a 

an increase in the volume of remote control sales, which was partially offset by lower prices. The increase in volume was attributable to the continued 

$1.6 million reserve for a receivable due from a former European distributor, $1.2 million to delivery and freight costs caused by the increase in volume, 

deployment of advanced function set-top boxes by the service operators. These advanced functions include personal video recording (“PVR”), video-

$0.7 million to increased tax and audit fees, $0.6 million to sales commissions, $0.5 million to travel, $0.3 million to trade shows, $0.3 million to tem-

on-demand (“VOD”), and high definition (“HD”) television.

porary clerical and warehouse staff, and $0.6 million to all other selling, general, and administrative costs. These items were partially offset by lower 

employee bonus expense, which decreased by $2.8 million, temporary professional staff, which decreased by $0.9 million, outside legal fees, which 

decreased by $0.4 million, and employment and recruiting costs, which decreased $0.3 million. We expect that selling, general, and administrative 

expenses will range from $55 to $59 million for the full year 2006.

In 2005, we recorded $0.8 million of interest income compared to $0.7 million for 2004. This increase is due to higher money market rates. Net 

interest income will be approximately $1.0 million in 2006.

In 2005, other income, net was $2.2 million as compared to $0.5 million of other expense, net for 2004. Approximately $2.1 million of other income 

in 2005 resulted from foreign currency transaction gains reflecting the strengthening of the US Dollar. The results for 2004 included foreign currency ex-

change losses of $0.2 million. An additional $0.4 million of other expense in 2004 was the result of our write-down of an investment in a private company.

We recorded income tax expense of $5.0 million in 2005 compared to $4.6 million in 2004. Our effective tax rate was 33.9% in 2005, and 33.6% in 2004. 

We estimate that our effective tax rate will range between 34.0% and 36.0% for the full year 2006 (see Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements).

Net sales in our consumer lines (One For All® international retail, private label, and direct import) accounted for approximately 38% of net sales for 
2004 compared to 42% for 2003. Our net sales for 2004 from our consumer lines were $60.8 million, an increase of 20% from net sales of $50.8 million 
in 2003. Of this increase, the One For All® international retail sales for 2004 increased by 39% to $50.8 million from $36.6 million in 2003. About $4.5 
million of this increase was related to favorable foreign exchange rate movements, as both the Euro and British Pound strengthened compared to the 
U.S. Dollar. The remaining improvement in international retail sales was due to an increase in sales of our Sky-branded digital accessories, One For All®  
remote controls, and audio-video accessories. Private label sales for 2004 decreased by 27% to $6.8 million from $9.3 million in 2003 due to a decline 
in the volume of Kameleon® sales. United States direct import licensing and product revenues for 2004 decreased by 33% to $3.2 million from $4.8 
million in 2003 due to a decline in the volume of Kameleon® sales.

38
38

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

39
39

  
 
		
	
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit for 2004 was $61.6 million compared to $46.3 million for 2003. Gross profit as a percent of sales for 2004 was 38.9% compared to 38.4% 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

for 2003. The increase was primarily attributable to the strengthening of the Euro and British Pound compared to the U.S. Dollar, which resulted in an 

increase of approximately $4.1 million profit and added 1.5% to the gross profit rate. This increase was partially offset by increased inventory write-

downs of $0.9 million which contributed to a 0.5% reduction in the gross profit rate. In addition, the increase in gross profit rate was partially offset by 

OEM sales, which generally have a lower gross profit rate, being a larger percentage of our total business.

Research and development expenses increased 25% from $4.7 million in 2003 to $5.9 million in 2004. The increase was related to our continued 
expansion of the Nevo® platform, and the development of audio-video accessories for sale in our retail channel. In addition, IPR&D of $0.2 million 
related to the SimpleDevices acquisition was expensed in the fourth quarter of 2004.

i n   t h o u s a n d s 	

Year	Ended	
December	31,	2005	

Increase	
(decrease)	

Year	Ended		
December	31,	2004	

Increase		
(decrease)	

Year	Ended
December	31,	2003

Cash provided by operating activities 

$ 

14,129 

$ 

10,138 

$ 

3,991 

$ (15,254) 

$  19,245

Cash (used) provided by investing activities 

Cash (used) provided by financing activities 

Effect of exchange rate changes 

(4,037) 

(3,246) 

(5,677) 

12,521 

1,564 

(16,558) 

  (35,740) 

  19,182

(4,810) 

(7,148) 

(7,045) 

1,368 

1,716 

2,338

(348)

December	31,	2005	

Increase
(decrease)	

December	31,	2004

$ 

43,641 

$ 

1,169 

$  42,472

77,201 

2,120 

75,081

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 28% from $33.0 million in 2003 to $42.2 million in 2004. Approximately $2.3 million of 

this increase was attributable to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance efforts, $1.7 million to appreciation of the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar, $1.5 million to 

Cash and cash equivalents 

increased performance- based employee bonuses, $0.9 million to the acquisition of SimpleDevices, $0.8 million to freight costs, and $0.7 million to 

Working capital 

non-Sarbanes-Oxley related professional services costs.

In 2004, we recorded $0.7 million of interest income compared to $0.6 million for 2003. This increase was due to higher money market rates in 

Europe, an investment in a certificate of deposit, and a higher average cash balance.

In 2004, other expense, net was $0.5 million as compared to $0.3 million of other income, net for 2003. Approximately $0.4 million of expense was 

the result of our write-down of an investment in a private company, and $0.2 million of expense resulted from foreign currency exchange losses. The 

results for 2003 included a foreign currency exchange gain of $0.3 million.

We recorded income tax expense of $4.6 million in 2004 compared to $3.2 million in 2003. Our estimated effective tax rate was 33.6% in 2004, 

and 34.0% in 2003.

Cash Provided by Operating Activities: Our principal sources of funds are from operations. Cash provided by operating activities for 2005 was $14.1 

million, compared to $4.0 million and $19.2 million during 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in cash flow from operations in 2005 compared to 

2004 is primarily due to lower income tax payments in 2005, increased cash collections resulting from higher net sales offset partially by an increase in 

our days sales outstanding (“DSO”) and accounts payable & accrued expenses increasing by a greater amount in 2005 versus 2004.

There were certain operating factors that affected our liquidity during 2005, which we expect will continue to affect our liquidity in the future. One 

factor was the extension of payment terms with two of our major customers from 30 to 60 days and 90 to 120 days, respectively. These payment term 

extensions resulted in an increase in our DSO from 67.5 days at December 31, 2004 to 76.4 days at December 31, 2005. In addition, our liquidity was 

also affected by a planned increase in our inventory balance. We increased our inventory balances as a result of our strategy to lower the amount of 

SimpleDevices, Inc. Transaction:  We accounted for the acquisition of SimpleDevices by the purchase method of accounting. As a result, we allocated 

products that are air shipped. During 2005, there was increased demand for advanced function set-top boxes that include features such as DVRs, PVRs 

the purchase price of the acquisition based on the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Significant portions of the Simple-

and HDTV. This shift drove a corresponding increase in demand from our subscription broadcast customers for our remote controls that interact with 

Devices purchase price were identified as intangible assets. We employed valuation techniques which reflected guidance from the American Institute 

these advanced set top boxes. Through the first two quarters of 2005, we did not have enough inventory on hand to meet this demand. As a result, we 

of Certified Public Accountants’ Practice Aid Series entitled “Assets Acquired in a Business Combination to Be Used in Research and Development 

were forced to air ship a significant amount of orders to maintain our customer service level. In order to alleviate the higher costs related to air ship-

Activities:  A  Focus  on  Software,  Electronic  Devices,  and  Pharmaceutical  Industries”  on  approaches  and  procedures  to  be  followed  in  developing   

ments, we increased our inventory levels. We believe that the cost savings from shipping via ocean freight versus air will be greater than the additional 

allocations to acquired IPR&D.

The final purchase price allocation included our identification of $240 thousand of IPR&D. This allocation represented the estimated fair value, 

based upon risk-adjusted cash flows, of SimpleDevices’ IPR&D projects. At the date of acquisition, the development of these projects had not yet 

reached technological feasibility and the IPR&D had no alternative future uses. Accordingly, we expensed these costs as research and development 

in the quarter ended December 31, 2004. The remaining SimpleDevices purchase premium was allocated to identifiable intangibles, which are being 

amortized over various periods ranging from 5 to 10 years, as well as goodwill.

SimpleDevices recorded net sales of $0.8 million and a pretax loss of $0.5 million during the period between October 1, 2004 (acquisition date) 

and December 31, 2004. Sales consisted primarily of engineering services related to the development of hardware utilized by SimpleDevices’ cus-

tomers to run the SimplePlatforms software. In addition, SimpleDevices also generated revenue customizing their software products to customer’s 

specific  needs.  Sales  attributable  to  SimpleDevices  are  included  in  our  Business  category  when  we  discuss  consolidated  results.  The  results  of  

SimpleDevices have been included since the date of acquisition and are described below.

•  Gross profit was $0.3 million, or 39.5% of sales. 

carrying cost of the increase in inventory. Our net inventory turns were 4.6 turns at December 31, 2005, down from 5.3 turns at December 31, 2004.

Cash (Used) Provided by Investing and Financing Activities: Cash used for investing activities during 2005 was $4.0 million as compared to $16.6 million 

and cash provided of $19.2 million during 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 was 

primarily caused by the purchase of SimpleDevices in 2004 for $12.8 million.

Capital expenditures in 2005, 2004, and 2003 were $3.1 million, $2.7 million, and $2.5 million, respectively. Capital expenditures relate primarily to 

acquiring product tooling each year. We are currently evaluating our existing and future information system requirements, and may make a significant 

investment to upgrade our systems in 2006.

On September 15, 2003, we entered into a three-year $15.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with Comerica 

Bank (“Comerica”). This Credit Facility expires in September 2006, and we are currently involved in negotiations to extend this facility. Under the 

Credit Facility with Comerica, the interest payable is variable and is based on the bank’s cost of funds or the LIBOR rate plus a fixed margin of 1.25%. 
The interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2005 using the LIBOR Rate option plus a fixed margin of 1.25% was 5.64%. We pay a commitment fee 

ranging from zero to a maximum of 1/4 of 1% per year on the unused portion of the credit line depending on the amount of cash investment retained 

•  Research and development expenses were $0.2 million, which represents the expensing of in-process technology as a result of the acquisition.

with Comerica during each quarter. Under the terms of this Credit Facility, dividend payments are allowed for up to 100% of the prior fiscal year net 

• 

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $0.6 million, which consisted primarily of engineering payroll and benefits costs.

income to be paid within 90 days of the prior year-end. We are subject to certain financial covenants related to our net worth, quick ratio, and net 

income. Amounts available for borrowing under this Credit Facility are reduced by outstanding import letters of credit. As of December 31, 2005, we 

had no amounts outstanding under this credit facility and no outstanding import letters of credit. Furthermore, as of December 31, 2005, we are in 

40
40

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

41
41

	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
compliance with all financial covenants required by the Credit Facility.

Cash used for financing activities during 2005 was $3.2 million as compared to $4.8 million and cash provided of $2.3 million during 2004 and 

2003, respectively. Proceeds from stock option exercises were $2.9 million during 2005, compared to proceeds of $1.9 million and $3.3 million dur-

ing 2004 and 2003, respectively. We purchased 356,285 shares of our common stock at a cost of $6.1 million during 2005, compared to 494,998 and 

liabilities. The Jobs Act was enacted on October 22, 2004. FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period 

of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 

109. The undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. Consequently, we do not expect this standard 

to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

84,437 shares at a cost of $6.7 and $1.0 million during 2004 and 2003, respectively. We hold these shares as treasury stock, and they are available for 

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs — An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (“SFAS 151”). SFAS 151 amends 

reissue. Presently, except for using a small number of these treasury shares to compensate our outside board members, we have no plans to distribute 

the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling 

these shares, although we may change these plans if necessary to fulfill our on-going business objectives. We have authority under the Credit Facility 

costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions, this new standard requires that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, 

to acquire up to 1.5 million shares of our common stock in market purchases. Between the date the Credit Facility was executed and December 31, 

double freight, and re-handling costs be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal” as stated 

2005, we purchased 897,019 shares of our common stock leaving 602,981 remaining shares authorized for purchase. During 2006 we may continue to 

in ARB No. 43. Additionally, SFAS 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overhead to the cost of conversion be based on the normal capac-

purchase shares of our common stock if we believe conditions are favorable.

Historically, our working capital needs have typically been greatest during the third and fourth quarters when accounts receivable and inventories 

increase in connection with the fourth quarter holiday selling season. At December 31, 2005, we had $77.2 million of working capital as compared to 

ity of the production facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and we are required to adopt this standard in the first 

quarter of 2006, beginning on January 1, 2006. We do not expect this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and 

financial condition.

$75.1 at December 31, 2004. The increase in working capital during these periods is principally due to higher accounts receivable and inventory bal-

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets — An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for 

ances at December 31, 2005 compared to December 31, 2004.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2005 and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquid-

ity and cash flow in future periods.

c o n t r a c t u a l   o b i l g a t i o n s  i n   t h o u s a n d s 	

Total	

Less	than	1	year	

	1	-	3	Years	

4	-	5	years	

After	5	years

Payments	Due	by	Period

Operating lease obligations 

Purchase obligations 

Total 

$  5,118 

$  1,455 

$  2,324 

$ 

912 

$ 

427

1,503 

480 

1,023 

— 

—

$  6,621 

$  1,935 

$  3,347 

$ 

912 

$ 

427

At December 31, 2005, we did not have any bank guarantees that provide for the bank to make payment on our behalf in the event of our non-payment 

for transactions with suppliers in the ordinary course of business.

Nonmonetary Transactions” (“SFAS 153”). SFAS 153 eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar pro-

ductive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions,” and replaces it with an exception for exchanges 

that do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153 specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the 

entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS 153 is effective for the fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005 and we 

are required to adopt the standard in the first quarter of 2006, beginning on January 1, 2006. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption 

of SFAS 153 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition but do not expect it will have a material impact.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R, “Share Based Payments.” SFAS 123R requires companies to expense the value of stock options and 

similar awards. This statement is a revision of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting 

for Stock Issued to Employees,” and its related implementation guidance. SFAS 123R requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services 

received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be rec-

ognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award — the requisite service period (usually the 

vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. In March 2005, the 

It is our policy to carefully monitor the state of our business, cash requirements, and capital structure. We believe that funds generated from our 

SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) regarding the SEC’s interpretation of SFAS 123R and the valuation of share-based payments 

operations and available from our credit facility will be sufficient to fund current business operations as well as anticipated growth at least through the 

for public companies. SFAS 123R, and its related implementation guidance, will significantly change existing accounting practice and will have a material 

end of 2006; however, there can be no assurance that such funds will be adequate for that purpose.

effect on our reported earnings. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123 will no longer be an alternative to financial statement 

New Accounting Pronouncements
FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 109-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified 

Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,” (“FSP 109-1”), gives guidance under SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for In-

come Taxes,” with respect to the provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Jobs Act”) that provides a tax deduction on qualified 

production activities. The Jobs Act includes a tax deduction of up to 9 percent (when fully phased-in) of the lesser of (a) “qualified production activi-

ties income,” as defined in the Jobs Act, or (b) taxable income (after the deduction for the utilization of any net operating loss carryforwards). This 

tax deduction is limited to 50 percent of W-2 wages paid by the taxpayer. FSP 109-1 states that an enterprise should account for the deduction as a 

special deduction in accordance with Statement 109. In addition, FSP 109-1 requires that the special deduction be considered by an enterprise in (a) 

recognition.

We are required to adopt SFAS 123R in the first quarter of fiscal 2006, beginning January 1, 2006. Under SFAS 123R, we must determine the appro-

priate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation cost and the transition method to be 

used at the date of adoption. The transition methods include modified-prospective and modified-retrospective adoption options. Under the modified- 

retrospective option, prior periods may be restated either as of the beginning of the year of adoption or for all periods presented. The modified- 

prospective method requires that compensation expense be recorded for all unvested stock options and restricted stock at the beginning of the first 

quarter of adoption of SFAS 123R, while the modified-retrospective method would record compensation expense for all unvested stock options and 

restricted stock beginning with the first period of adoption.

measuring deferred taxes when graduated tax rates are a significant factor and (b) assessing whether a valuation allowance is necessary as required 

We plan to apply the modified prospective transition method, which requires that compensation expense be recorded for all unvested stock op-

by paragraph 232 of Statement 109. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of FSP 109-1 will have on our consolidated results of 

tions and restricted stock beginning the first quarter of 2006. We have chosen the Black-Scholes valuation model to value stock-based compensation 

operations and financial condition but do not expect it will have a material impact.

FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American 

Jobs Creation Act of 2004” (“FSP 109-2”), provides guidance under SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” with respect to recording the 

potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Jobs Act”) on income tax expense and deferred tax 

utilizing an expected volatility estimated using the historical method. Unamortized compensation expense related to outstanding unvested options, 

as determined in accordance with FAS 123R, that we expect to record during 2006 is approximately $2.7 million before income taxes. This estimate 

excludes the effect of additional expense related to new awards that may be granted during 2006.

42
42

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

43
43

 
 
 
 
 
 
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” (“SFAS 154”) which replaces Accounting Principles 

consumer interaction with products and services within the home easier and more enjoyable. We intend to invest in new products and technology to 

Board Opinions No. 20 “Accounting Changes” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements—An Amendment of 

meet our customer needs now and into the future.

APB Opinion No. 28.” SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes 

retrospective application, or the latest practicable date, as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and the reporting of a 

correction of an error. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005 

and we are required to adopt the standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. We do not expect this standard to have a material impact on our consoli-

dated results of operations and financial condition.

In June 2005, the FASB issued FSP FAS 143-1, “Accounting for Electronic Equipment Waste Obligations” (“FSP 143-1”), which provides guidance 

on the accounting for certain obligations associated with the Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (the “Directive”), which was 

adopted by the European Union (“EU”). Under the Directive, the financing of historical waste held by private households is to be borne collectively by 

producers that are selling in the market during each measurement period (to be defined by each EU-member country). The volume of equipment that 

qualifies as historical waste that those producers have sold in the market prior to the measurement period is not considered. Producers will be required 

to contribute proportionately based on their participation in the market (for example, in proportion to their respective shares of the market by type 

of equipment). However, the exact method to be used to compute the respective proportions to be contributed by producers will be determined by 

each EU-member country. For commercial users, the waste management obligation for historical equipment (products put on the market on or prior 

to August 13, 2005) remains with these entities until the equipment is replaced. FSP 143-1 is required to be applied to the later of the first reporting 

period ending after June 8, 2005 or the date of the Directive’s adoption into law by the applicable EU member countries in which we have significant 

operations. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of FSP 143-1 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial 

condition. Such effects will depend on the respective laws adopted by the EU member countries.

Outlook
Our focus is to build technology and products that make the consumers’ interaction with devices and content within the home easier and more en-

joyable. The pace of change in the home is increasing. The growth of new devices, such as DVD players, PVR/DVR technologies and home theater 

solutions, to name only a few, has transformed control of the home entertainment center into a complex challenge for the consumer. The more recent 

introduction and projected growth of digital media technologies in consumers’ lives will further increase this complexity. We have set out to create the 

interface for the connected home, building a bridge between the home devices of today and the networked home of the future. We intend to invest in 

new products and technology, particularly in the connected home space, which will expand our business beyond the control of devices to the control 

of and access to content, such as digital media, to enrich the entertainment experience.

We will continue enhancing our leadership position in our core business by developing custom products for our subscription broadcasting, OEM, 

retail, and computing customers, growing our capture expertise in infrared technology and radio frequency standards, adding to our portfolio of 

patented or patent pending technologies and developing new platform products. We are also developing new ways to enhance remote controls and 

other accessory products.

During 2006, we will continue to develop new products featuring our Kameleon® interface technology, a display technology that provides ease of 
use by illuminating only the keys needed to control each entertainment device. We are continuing development of our Nevo® technology, an embed-
ded solution that transforms an electronic display into a sophisticated and easy-to-use wireless home control and automation device. We are continu-
ing to seek ways to integrate these platform technologies into other forms and devices. Nevo 2.0® was launched in July of 2004 as a feature on a series 
of HP’s handheld devices, which reached its end of life during the third quarter of 2005. Building on this platform, we used some components of the 
Nevo 2.0® technology in a new product named “NevoSL”® which we began to ship in the second quarter of 2005. This product is designed for use in 
the home. In addition, we are working on product line extensions to our One For All® audio/video accessories which include digital antennas, signal 
boosters, television brackets and A/V cleaning products.

We are also seeking ways to increase our customer base worldwide, particularly in the areas of subscription broadcasting, OEM, and One For 
All® international retail. We will continue to work on strengthening existing relationships by working with customers to understand how to make the 

Through SimpleDevices, we continued developing software and firmware solutions that can enable devices such as TVs, set-top boxes, stereos, 

automotive audio systems and other consumer electronic products to wirelessly connect and interact with home networks and interactive services to 

deliver digital entertainment and information. This “smart device” category is emerging and in 2006 we look to build relationships with our customers 

in this category.

In 2006, we will continue to evaluate acceptable acquisition targets and strategic partnership opportunities in our core business lines as well as in 

the networked home marketplace. We caution, however, that no assurance can be made that any suitable acquisition target or partnership opportu-

nity will be identified and, if identified, that a transaction can be consummated. Moreover, if consummated, no assurance can be made that any such 

acquisition or partnership will profitably add to our operations.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 

We are exposed to various market risks, including interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. We have established policies, proce-

dures and internal processes governing our management of these risks and the use of financial instruments to mitigate our risk exposure.

The interest payable under our revolving Credit Facility with our bank is variable and based on either (i) the bank’s cost of funds or (ii) the LIBOR 

rate plus a fixed margin of 1.25%; the rate is affected by changes in market interest rates. At December 31, 2005, we had no borrowings on our credit 

facility. The interest rate in effect on the credit facility as of December 31, 2005 using the LIBOR Rate option plus a fixed margin of 1.25% was 5.64%. 

This credit facility will expire in September 2006 and we are currently negotiating to extend this credit facility.

At December 31, 2005 we had wholly owned subsidiaries in The Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Argentina and Spain. Sales from 

these operations are typically denominated in local currencies including Euros, British Pounds and Argentine Pesos, thereby creating exposure to 

changes in exchange rates. Changes in local currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. Dollar, and in some cases, to each other, may positively or 

negatively affect our sales, gross margins and net income. From time to time, we enter into foreign currency exchange agreements to manage our 

exposure arising from fluctuating exchange rates that affect cash flows and our reported income. Contract terms for the foreign currency exchange 

agreements normally last less than nine months. We do not enter into any derivative transactions for speculative purposes.

The value of our net balance sheet positions held in foreign currency can also be impacted by fluctuating exchange rates, as can the value of the 

income generated by our European subsidiaries. It is difficult to estimate the impact of fluctuations on reported income, as it depends on the open-

ing and closing rates, the average net balance sheet positions held in a foreign currency and the amount of income generated in local currency. We 

routinely forecast what these balance sheet positions and income generated in local currency may be, and we take steps to minimize exposure as we 

deem appropriate.

The  sensitivity  of  earnings  and  cash  flows  to  the  variability  in  exchange  rates  is  assessed  by  applying  an  approximate  range  of  potential  rate 

fluctuations to our assets, obligations and projected results of operations denominated in foreign currency. Based on our overall foreign currency 

rate exposure at December 31, 2005, we believe that movements in foreign currency rates could have a material affect on our financial position. We 

estimate that if the exchange rates for the Euro and the British Pound relative to the U.S. Dollar fluctuate 10% from December 31, 2005, first quarter 

net income and cash flows would fluctuate by approximately $0.3 million and $4.2 million, respectively.

44
44

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

45
45

Financial Statements and Supplemental Data

Report Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Universal Electronics, Inc.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Universal Electronics Inc.: 

In our opinion, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Universal Electronics, Inc. as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated 

cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2004, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Universal 

statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s 

Electronics Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period 

management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards 

require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. 

An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes as-

sessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presenta-

tion. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position 

of Universal Electronics, Inc. as of December 31, 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash flows for the year then 

ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Schedule II is presented 

for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing pro-

cedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial 

statements taken as a whole.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness 

of  Universal  Electronics,  Inc.’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  December  31,  2005,  based  on  criteria  established  in  Internal  Control 

— Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 10, 2006, 

expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

the financial statement schedule for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2004 presents fairly, in all material respects, the informa-

tion set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement 

schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial 

statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Ac-

counting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether 

the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclo-

sures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall 

financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Orange County, CA

March 16, 2005

Grant Thornton LLP 

Irvine, California

March 10, 2006

46
46

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

47
47

Consolidated Balance Sheets  

i n   t h o u s a n d s ,   e x c e p t   s h a r e - r e l a t e d   d a t a  

Assets

Current assets:

  Cash and cash equivalents 

  Accounts receivable, net 

Inventories, net 

  Prepaid expenses and other current assets 

Income tax receivable 

  Deferred income taxes 

  Total current assets 

Equipment, furniture and fixtures, net 

Goodwill 

Intangible assets, net 

Other assets 

Deferred income taxes 

  Total assets 

Liabilities And Stockholders’ Equity

Current liabilities:

  Accounts payable 

  Accrued income taxes 

  Accrued compensation 

  Other accrued expenses 

  Total current liabilities 

Long term liabilities:

  Deferred income taxes 

  Deferred Revenue 

  Total liabilities 

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:

December 31,

2 0 0 5  

2 0 0 4  

i n   t h o u s a n d s ,   e x c e p t   p e r   s h a r e   a m o u n t s  

Consolidated Income Statements  

$ 

43,641 

$ 

42,472

41,861 

26,708 

3,841 

903 

2,971 

119,925 

4,352 

10,431 

6,007 

403 

5,201 

38,758

23,862

2,027

1,158

3,216

111,493

3,732

10,655

6,550

2,935

5,035

Net sales 

Cost of sales 

Gross profit  

Research and development expenses 

Selling, general and administrative expenses 

Operating income 

Interest income 

Other income (expense), net 

Income before provision for income taxes 

Provision for income taxes 

Net income  

Earnings per share:

Basic 

  Diluted  

$  146,319 

$  140,400

Shares used in computing earnings per share:

Basic 

  Diluted  

$ 

22,731 

$ 

17,559

7,551 

2,766 

9,676 

42,724 

74 

229 

4,267

5,914

8,672

36,412

107

—

43,027 

36,519

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Year Ended December 31,

2 0 0 5  

2 0 0 4  

2 0 0 3  

$  181,349 

$  158,380 

$  120,468

114,222 

67,127 

6,580 

48,870 

11,677 

845 

2,152 

14,674 

4,973 

9,701 

0.72 

0.69 

13,462 

13,992 

$ 

$ 

$ 

96,800 

61,580 

5,865 

42,175 

13,540 

723 

(540) 

13,723 

4,609 

9,114 

0.67 

0.65 

13,567 

14,100 

$ 

$ 

$ 

74,168

46,300

4,700

33,026

8,574

583

338

9,495

3,228

6,267

0.46

0.45

13,703

14,007

$ 

$ 

$ 

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding 

— 

—

  Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 16,963,748 and 
  16,642,743 shares issued at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively 

Paid-in capital 

  Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income 

  Retained earnings 

  Deferred stock-based compensation 

Less cost of common stock in treasury, 3,420,876 and 3,084,591  

shares at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively 

  Total stockholders’ equity 

  Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

169 

83,220 

(5,265) 

54,994 

(163) 

132,955 

(29,663) 

103,292 

167

78,872

3,571

45,293

(169)

127,734

(23,853)

103,881

$  146,319 

$  140,400

48
48

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

49
49

   
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Balance at December 31, 2002 

Comprehensive income:

Net income	

Currency translation adjustment 

Total comprehensive income 

Shares issued for retirement plan 

Purchase of treasury shares 

Stock options exercised 

Shares issued to Directors 

Stock-based compensation 

Tax benefit from exercise of non-qualified stock options 

Balance at December 31, 2003 

Comprehensive income:

Net income 

Currency translation adjustment 

Total comprehensive income 

Shares issued for retirement plan 

Purchase of treasury shares 

Stock options exercised 

Restricted stock grants 

Shares issued to Directors 

Stock-based compensation 

Tax benefit from exercise of non-qualified stock options 

Balance at December 31, 2004 

Comprehensive income:

Net income 

Currency translation adjustment 

Total comprehensive income 

Shares issued for retirement plan 

Purchase of treasury shares 

Stock options exercised 

Restricted stock grants 

Shares issued to Directors 

Stock-based compensation 

Tax benefit from exercise of non-qualified stock options 

Balance at December 31, 2005 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Common Stock Issued 

Shares 

16,001 

Amount 

$ 

160 

Common Stock in Treasury 

Shares 

Amount 

Paid-in 
Capital 

Accumulated Other 
Comprehensive 
Income (Loss) 

Retained 
Earnings 

Deferred
Stock-Based 
Compensation 

Totals 

Comprehensive
Income

(2,521) 

$  (16,270) 

$  71,322 

$ 

(1,740) 

$ 

29,912 

$ 

(147) 

$ 

83,237

33 

371 

1 

3 

6,267 

2,038 

(85) 

(963) 

7 

360 

3,339 

341 

443 

105 

361

(963)

3,342

105

341

443

16,405 

164 

(2,599) 

(17,233) 

75,805 

298 

36,179 

(42) 

95,171

29 

209 

1 

2 

9,114 

3,273 

(495) 

(6,696) 

9 

76 

430 

1,883 

349 

(76) 

481 

431

(6,696)

1,885

—

—

222

481

(349) 

222 

16,643 

167 

(3,085) 

(23,853) 

78,872 

3,571 

45,293 

(169) 

103,881

31 

290 

2 

9,701 

(8,836) 

(356) 

(6,110) 

20 

300 

533 

2,862 

326 

(300) 

74 

853 

533 

(6,110)

2,864

—

—

406 

853 

(326) 

332 

16,964 

$ 

169 

(3,421) 

$  (29,663) 

$  83,220 

$  (5,265) 

$ 

54,994 

$ 

(163) 

$  103,292 

  6,267

  2,038

  8,305

  9,114

  3,273

12,387

  9,701

(8,836)

865

50
50

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

51
51

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Cash provided by operating activities: 
  Net income 

  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 

  Depreciation and amortization 

  Provision for doubtful accounts 

  Provision for inventory write-downs 

  Deferred income taxes 

  Tax benefit from exercise of stock options 

  Shares issued for employee benefit plan 

  Employee and director stock-based compensation 

  Loss on disposal of fixed assets 

  Write-off of in-process R & D 

  Write down of investment in private company 

  Other 

  Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of acquisition in 2004): 

  Accounts receivable 

Inventory 

  Prepaid expenses and other assets 

  Accounts payable and accrued expenses 

  Accrued income and other taxes 

  Net cash provided by operating activities 

Cash (used for) provided by investing activities: 

  Acquisition of equipment, furniture and fixtures 

Payments for business acquired, net of cash acquired 

  Acquisition of intangible assets 

Purchases of short-term investments 

Sale of short-term investments 

  Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities 

Cash (used for) provided by financing activities: 

Proceeds from stock options exercised 

Treasury stock purchased 

Payments on note payable 

  Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 

Year Ended December 31,

2 0 0 5  

2 0 0 4  

2 0 0 3  

$ 

9,701 

$ 

9,114 

$ 

6,267

3,702 

2,121 

2,735 

(130) 

853 

533 

406 

— 

— 

3 

— 

(6,966) 

(7,128) 

(1,207) 

5,416 

4,090 

14,129 

(3,137) 

— 

(900) 

— 

— 

3,093 

161 

3,788 

349 

481 

431 

222 

192 

240 

357 

— 

(6,386) 

(7,311) 

(2,490) 

2,329 

(579) 

3,991 

(2,657) 

(12,754) 

(1,147) 

— 

— 

(4,037) 

(16,558) 

2,864 

(6,110) 

— 

(3,246) 

(5,677) 

1,169 

42,472 

1,885 

(6,695) 

— 

(4,810) 

1,368 
(16,009) 

58,481 

3,358

392

2,890

(849)

443

360

446

—

—

—

(3)

(1,145)

(6,230)

(657)

11,006

2,967

19,245

(2,470)

—

(848)
(22,000)

44,500

19,182

3,343

(963)

(42)

2,338

(348)

40,417

18,064

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 — Description of Business 
Universal Electronics Inc., based in Southern California, has developed a broad line of easy-to-use, pre-programmed universal wireless control prod-

ucts and audio-video accessories that are marketed to enhance home entertainment systems as well as software designed to enable consumers to 

wirelessly connect, control and interact with an increasingly complex home environment. Our primary markets include retail, private label, original 

equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), custom installers, cable and satellite service providers, and companies in the personal computing industry. Over 

the past 18 years, we have developed a broad portfolio of patented technologies and a database of home connectivity software that we license to our 

customers, including many leading Fortune 500 companies. In addition, we sell our universal wireless control products and other audio/visual acces-

sories through our European headquarters in The Netherlands, and to distributors and retailers in Europe, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, the 
Middle East, Mexico, and selected countries in Asia and Latin America under the One For All® brand name.

As used herein, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Universal Electronics Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates to the contrary.

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 
Principles of Consolidation:  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All the 

intercompany accounts and significant transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. Between October 1 and December 

31, 2004, we acquired the outstanding shares of SimpleDevices Inc. The results of SimpleDevices’ operations have been included in the consolidated 

financial statements since the date of acquisition (See Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements).

Estimates and Assumptions:  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States 

of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets 

and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results 

may differ from these estimates and judgments. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue 

recognition, allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts, warranties, inventory valuation, business combinations, purchase price allocations, 

review for impairment of long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill, contingencies, and income taxes. These estimates may be adjusted as ad-

ditional information becomes available and any adjustment could be significant.

Revenue Recognition:  We recognize revenue on the sale of products when delivery has occurred, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, 

the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. We record a provision for estimated sales returns and allowances on 

product sales in the same period as the related revenues are recorded. These estimates are based on historical sales returns, analysis of credit memo 

data and other known factors. The provision recorded for estimated sales returns and allowances is deducted from gross sales to arrive at net sales in 

the period the related revenue is recorded. Sales allowances reduce gross accounts receivable to arrive at accounts receivable, net in the same period 

the related receivable is recorded. We have no obligations after the delivery of our products other than the associated warranties (See Note 20 to the 

consolidated financial statements).

We  generate  service  revenue  as  a  result  of  providing  consumer  support  programs  to  some  of  our  customers  through  our  call  centers.  These 

service revenues are recognized when performed, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collect-

$ 

43,641 

$ 

42,472 

$ 

58,481

ibility is reasonably assured.

Supplemental Cash Flow Information — Income taxes paid were $0.3 million, $4.5 million, and $1.1 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

We also license our intellectual property (including our patented technologies) trade secrets, trademarks, and database of infrared codes. We 

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities: 
In  2004  we  purchased  over  99%  of  the  outstanding  shares  of  SimpleDevices,  Inc.  for  $12.8  million,  net  of  cash  acquired  (See  Note  21  to  the  consolidated  financial  
statements). In conjunction with the acquisition, assets acquired and liabilities assumed were as follows:

Fair value of assets acquired 
Cash paid for capital stock, net 

Liabilities assumed 

$ 

13,613

12,761

$ 

852

record license revenue when our customers ship products incorporating our intellectual property, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the 

sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.

When a sales arrangement contains multiple elements, such as software products, licenses and/or services, we allocate revenue to each element 

based on its relative fair value. The fair values for the multiple elements are determined based on vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), or the 

price charged when the element is sold separately. The residual method is utilized when VSOE exists for all the undelivered elements, but not for the 

52
52

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

53
53

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
delivered element. This is performed by allocating revenue to the undelivered elements (that have VSOE) and the residual revenue to the delivered 

Inventories:  Inventories consisting of wireless control devices, including universal remote controls, wireless keyboards, antennas, and related com-

elements. When the fair value for an undelivered element cannot be determined, we defer revenue for the delivered elements until the undelivered 

ponent parts, and are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. We carry inventory in amounts 

elements are delivered. We limit the amount of revenue recognition for delivered elements to the amount that is not contingent on the future delivery 

necessary to satisfy our customers’ inventory requirements on a timely basis.

of products or services or subject to customer-specified return or refund privileges.

New product innovations and technological advances may shorten a given product’s life cycle. We continually monitor the inventory status to con-

We account for revenue under software licensing arrangements involving significant production, modification or customization of software in ac-

trol inventory levels and dispose of any excess or obsolete inventories on hand. We write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarket-

cordance with SOP 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts”. We recognize revenue and profit 

able inventory equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated market value based upon our best estimates about future 

as work progresses on long-term, fixed price contracts using the percentage-of-completion method. When applying the percentage-of-completion 

demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs 

method, we rely on estimates of total expected contract revenue and labor hours. We follow this method because reasonably dependable estimates 

may be required. Inventory write-downs totaled approximately $2.7 million, $3.8 million and $2.9 million in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.

of the revenue and labor applicable to various stages of a contract can be made. Recognized revenue and profit are subject to revisions as the contract 

progresses to completion. Revisions to revenue and profit estimates are charged to income in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision 

become known and losses are accrued when identified.

Foreign Currency Translation and Foreign Currency Transactions:  The functional currency for our foreign operations is their local currency. The transla-

tion of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates and for 

revenue and expense accounts using the average exchange rate during the period. The gains and losses resulting from the translation are included 

in the foreign currency translation adjustment account, a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in stockholders’ equity, and 

are excluded from net income. The portions of inter-company accounts receivable and accounts payable that are not intended for settlement are 

translated at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date.

Equipment, Furniture and Fixtures:  Equipment, furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is calculated 

using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and 

accumulated depreciation are removed from the appropriate accounts and any gain or loss is included in current income.

Estimated useful lives consisted of the following: 

Tooling and Equipment 

Furniture and Fixtures 

Leasehold Improvements 

2 — 7 Years

5 — 7 Years

Lesser of lease term or useful life

We recorded a foreign currency translation loss of $8.8 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 and a foreign currency translation 

Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets:  Intangible assets consist principally of distribution rights, patents, trademarks, trade names, and developed 

gain of $3.3 million and $2.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The foreign currency translation loss of 

and core technologies. Capitalized amounts related to patents represent external legal costs for the application and maintenance of patents. Intan-

$8.8 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 is due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus the Euro. The U.S. dollar/Euro spot 

gible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit, ranging from two to ten years.

rate was 1.18 and 1.35 at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The foreign currency translation gain of $3.3 million for the twelve 

months ended December 31, 2004 is due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar versus the Euro. The U.S. dollar/Euro spot rate was 1.35 and 1.26 at De-

cember 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The foreign currency translation gain of $2.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 

2003 is due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar versus the Euro. The U.S. dollar/Euro spot rate was 1.26 and 1.05 at December 31, 2003 and December 

31, 2002, respectively.

Transaction gains and losses generated by the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on recorded assets and liabilities denominated in a 

currency different from the functional currency of the applicable entity are recorded in other income (expense), net (See Note 15 to the consolidated 

financial statements).

Cash and Cash Equivalents:  Cash and cash equivalents include cash accounts and all investments purchased with initial maturities of three months 

or less. We maintain cash and cash equivalents with various financial institutions. These financial institutions are located in many different geographic 

regions. We mitigate our exposure to credit risk by placing our cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions.

Investments:  Included in other assets, as of December 31, 2004, is a cost investment in a private company with a carrying value of $3 thousand. We 

accounted for this investment, which did not have a readily determinable fair value, using the cost method. Our investment was less than 20%, we 

were unable to exercise significant influence over the investee, and we were not a primary beneficiary. Under the cost method, investments are car-

ried at cost and adjusted only for other-than-temporary declines in fair value and distributions of earnings or additional investments. We performed 
an impairment review during the year ended December 31, 2004 and determined that there was an other-than-temporary decline in the value of our 

investment. Accordingly, in 2004 the value of the investment was written down by $357 thousand to $3 thousand its estimated net realizable value, 

and the loss was recorded in other income (expense), net. In 2005, we received additional information regarding our investment indicating it was es-

sentially worthless. Accordingly, in 2005, the remaining $3 thousand investment balance was written off and the loss was recorded in other income 

(expense), net.

We assess the impairment of long-lived assets and intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value 

may not be recoverable. Factors considered important which could trigger an impairment review include the following: (1) significant underperfor-

mance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (2) significant changes in the manner of our use of the assets or strategy 

for the overall business and (3) significant negative industry or economic trends.

When we determine that the carrying value may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, 

we conduct an impairment review. The asset is impaired if its carrying value exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the 

use and eventual disposition of the asset. In assessing recoverability, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors.

The impairment loss is the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. We calculate fair value by taking the sum of the 

discounted projected cash flows over the assets remaining useful life, using a discount rate commensurate with the risks inherent in our current busi-

ness model. When calculating fair value, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows, discount rates and other factors.

Goodwill:  We record the excess purchase price of net tangible and intangible assets acquired over their estimated fair value as goodwill. We have 

adopted the provisions of SFAS 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets. Under the SFAS 142, we are required to test goodwill for impairment at least 

annually. We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill as of December 31 of each year and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances 

change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include, but 

are not limited to: (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (2) unanticipated competition, or (3) an adverse action or 

assessment by a regulator. In performing the impairment review, we determine the carrying amount of each reporting unit by assigning assets and 

liabilities, including the existing goodwill, to those reporting units (See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). A reporting unit is defined 

as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred to as a component). A component of an operating segment is deemed a 

reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews 

the operating results of that component. Our domestic and international components are “reporting units” within the operating segment “Core Busi-

ness”. SimpleDevices is the other operating segment and is a “reporting unit” as well.

54
54

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

55
55

To evaluate whether goodwill is impaired, we compare the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit’s 

We held foreign currency exchange contracts which resulted in a net pre-tax loss of approximately $409 thousand for the year ended December 

carrying amount, including goodwill. We determine the fair value of each reporting unit using the present value of their expected future cash flows. If 

31, 2005, and a net pre-tax gain of approximately $5 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2004. We did not enter into any foreign currency 

the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the amount of the impairment loss must be measured. The impairment loss would 

exchange contracts during the year ended December 31, 2003. We had two foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding at December 31, 2005, 

be calculated by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill to its carrying amount. In calculating the implied fair value of the reporting 

one forward contract with a notional value of $11.0 million, and one option structure known as a participating forward with a notional value of $25.0 

unit’s goodwill, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the other assets and liabilities of that unit based on their fair values. The excess 

million. We had no foreign currency exchange contracts or other derivatives outstanding at December 31, 2004.

of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amount assigned to its other assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment loss 

would be recognized when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.

Forward Contract:  We held a USD/Euro forward contract with a notional value of $11.0 million and a forward rate of $1.1744/Euro as of December 31, 

2005, due for settlement on January 20, 2006. We held the Euro position on this contract. The value of this contract was $93 thousand at December 

We conducted annual impairment reviews as of December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003. Based on the analysis performed we determined that each 

31, 2005. This contract is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets.

reporting unit’s fair value exceeded its carrying amount, and therefore concluded that there was no indication of an impairment loss.

Participating Forward:  We entered into a USD/Euro participating forward with a 50% participation rate and a notional value of $25.0 million in April 

Income Taxes:  Income tax expense includes U.S. and international income taxes. We account for income taxes using the liability method. We record 

2005. The strike price of the participating forward is $1.2675. The contract expired on December 30, 2005, due for settlement on January 3, 2006. The 

deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities on our balance sheet for expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in 

gain recorded related to this contract was $1.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2005. The value of this contract was approximately $1.1 

different periods for financial statement purposes versus tax return purposes. We record a valuation allowance to reduce net deferred tax assets if we 

million at December 31, 2005 and is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets.

determine that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Stock-Based  Compensation:  We account for  stock-based employee compensation by applying the intrinsic-value method  in  accordance with the 

Capitalized Software Costs:  We account for software development costs in accordance with SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Soft-

provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Under the intrinsic-value method, 

ware to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Costs incurred internally while creating a computer software product are expensed when incurred 

compensation cost is the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the 

as research and development until technological feasibility has been established. The Company has determined that technological feasibility for its 

stock. We grant stock options with an exercise price equal to the market value of the common stock on the date of grant, and therefore no compensa-

products is established when a working model is complete. Once technological feasibility is established, software costs are capitalized until the prod-

tion expense has been recognized related to options.

uct is available for general release to customers and is then amortized using the greater of (i) the ratio that current gross revenues for a product bear 

to the total current and anticipated future gross revenues or (ii) the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product. 

Software development costs consist primarily of salaries, employee benefits, supplies and materials. The straight-line amortization periods for capital-

ized software costs range from 2 to 5 years.

We have adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as amended by SFAS No. 148,  

“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure.” Under SFAS 123, compensation expense is computed based on the fair 

value of the stock options granted and is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the 

award (usually the vesting period). The fair value of the options granted is determined at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation 

Capitalized software costs are stated at cost net of accumulated amortization. Unamortized capitalized software costs were $0.3 million and $0.6 

model. If we had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value of the awards at the grant date, net income would have been the pro 

million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. We capitalized $0, $0.3 million, and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, 

forma amounts shown below.

respectively. Amortization expense related to capitalized software costs was $0.3 million, $0.2 million, and $0.1 million for the years ended December 

31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively (See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements).

i n   t h o u s a n d s ,   e x c e p t   p e r   s h a r e   a m o u n t s  

Research  and  Development:    We  account  for  research  and  development  costs  in  accordance  with  SFAS  No.  2,  Accounting  for  Research  and  Devel-

opment  Costs.  As  such,  research  and  development  costs  are  expensed  as  incurred  and  consist  primarily  of  salaries,  employee  benefits,  supplies  

Net income:

  As reported 

and materials.

Advertising:  Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense was $1.5 million, $1.2 million and $1.1 million, for the years ended De-

cember 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs:  In September 2000, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF 00-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling 

Fees and Costs. EITF 00-10 requires shipping and handling fees billed to customers to be classified as revenue and shipping and handling costs to be 

either classified as cost of sales or disclosed in the notes to the financial statements if classified elsewhere in the income statement. We include ship-

ping and handling fees billed to customers in net sales. Shipping and handling costs associated with in-bound freight are recorded in cost of goods 

sold. Other shipping and handling costs are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and totaled $6.3 million, $5.0 million and $3.9 

million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Derivatives:  Our foreign currency exposures are primarily concentrated in the Euro and British Pound. Depending on the predictability of future 

receivables, payables and cash flows in each operating currency, we periodically enter into foreign currency exchange contracts with terms normally 

lasting less than nine months to protect against the adverse effects that exchange-rate fluctuations may have on our foreign currency-denominated 

receivables,  payables  and  cash  flows.  We  do  not  enter  into  financial  instruments  for  speculation  or  trading  purposes.  These  derivatives  have  not 

qualified for hedge accounting. The gains and losses on both the derivatives and the foreign currency-denominated balances are recorded as foreign 

exchange transaction gains or losses and are classified in other income (expense), net.

  Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included  

in reported net income, net of related tax effects 

  Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined  
    under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects 

  Pro forma 

Basic earnings per share:

  As reported 

  Pro forma 

Diluted earnings per share:

  As reported 

  Pro forma 

Year Ended December 31,

2005 

2004 

2003

$ 

9,701 

$ 

9,114 

$  6,267

268 

147 

294

(2,792) 

(2,374) 

  (3,104)

$ 

7,177 

$ 

6,887 

$  3,457

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

0.72 

0.53 

0.69 

0.51 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

0.67 

0.51 

0.65 

0.49 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

0.46

0.25

0.45

0.25

56
56

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

57
57

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The fair value of options at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes model. The following assumptions were used for the grants in 

of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 

2005,  2004, and 2003, respectively: risk-free interest rate of approximately 3.73%, 3.01%, and 3.00%; expected volatility of approximately 58.35%, 

109. The undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. Consequently, we do not expect this standard 

65.51%, and 62.95%; expected life of five years for 2005, 2004 and 2003; and that our common stock will pay no dividends. The per share weighted 

to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

average grant date fair values of the options granted in 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $9.28, $7.94 and $5.87, respectively.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs — An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (“SFAS 151”). SFAS 151 amends 

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R, “Share Based Payments.” SFAS 123R requires companies to expense the value of stock options 

the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling 

and  similar  awards.  This  statement  is  a  revision  of  SFAS  123,  “Accounting  for  Stock-Based  Compensation”  and  supersedes  APB  Opinion  No.  25, 

costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions, this new standard requires that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, 

“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and its related implementation guidance. SFAS 123R requires a public entity to measure the cost of 

double freight, and re-handling costs be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal” as stated 

employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). 

in ARB No. 43. Additionally, SFAS 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overhead to the cost of conversion be based on the normal capac-

That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award — the requisite ser-

ity of the production facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and we are required to adopt this standard in the first 

vice period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite 

quarter of 2006, beginning on January 1, 2006. We do not expect this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and 

service. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) regarding the SEC’s interpretation of SFAS 123R and the valuation 

financial condition.

of share-based payments for public companies. SFAS 123R, and its related implementation guidance, will significantly change existing accounting 

practice and will have a material effect on our reported earnings. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123 will no longer be an 

alternative to financial statement recognition.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets — An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for 

Nonmonetary Transactions” (“SFAS 153”). SFAS 153 eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar pro-

ductive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions,” and replaces it with an exception for exchanges 

We are required to adopt SFAS 123R in the first quarter of fiscal 2006, beginning January 1, 2006. Under SFAS 123R, we must determine the ap-

that do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153 specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the 

propriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation cost and the transition method 

entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS 153 is effective for the fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005 and we 

to be used at the date of adoption. The transition methods include modified-prospective and modified-retrospective adoption options. Under the 

are required to adopt the standard in the first quarter of 2006, beginning on January 1, 2006. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption 

modified-retrospective option, prior periods may be restated either as of the beginning of the year of adoption or for all periods presented. The modi-

of SFAS 153 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition but do not expect it will have a material impact.

fied-prospective method requires that compensation expense be recorded for all unvested stock options and restricted stock at the beginning of the 

first quarter of adoption of SFAS 123R, while the modified-retrospective method would record compensation expense for all unvested stock options 

and restricted stock beginning with the first period of adoption.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” (“SFAS 154”) which replaces Accounting Principles 

Board Opinions No. 20 “Accounting Changes” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements—An Amendment of 

APB Opinion No. 28.” SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes 

We plan to apply the modified prospective transition method, which requires that compensation expense be recorded for all unvested stock op-

retrospective application, or the latest practicable date, as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and the reporting of a 

tions and restricted stock beginning the first quarter of 2006. We have chosen the Black-Scholes valuation model to value stock-based compensation 

correction of an error. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005 

utilizing an expected volatility estimated using the historical method. Unamortized compensation expense related to outstanding unvested options, 

and we are required to adopt the standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. We do not expect this standard to have a material impact on our consoli-

as determined in accordance with SFAS 123R, that we expect to record during 2006 is approximately $2.7 million before income taxes. This estimate 

dated results of operations and financial condition.

excludes the effect of additional expense related to new awards that may be granted during 2006.

In June 2005, the FASB issued FSP FAS 143-1, “Accounting for Electronic Equipment Waste Obligations” (“FSP 143-1”), which provides guidance 

Reclassifications:  Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the presentation utilized in the current year ended December 31, 2005.

on the accounting for certain obligations associated with the Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (the “Directive”), which was 

New Accounting Pronouncements:  FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 109-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to 

the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,” (“FSP 109-1”), gives guidance under SFAS 

No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” with respect to the provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Jobs Act”) that provides 

a tax deduction on qualified production activities. The Jobs Act includes a tax deduction of up to 9 percent (when fully phased-in) of the lesser of (a) 

“qualified production activities income,” as defined in the Jobs Act, or (b) taxable income (after the deduction for the utilization of any net operating 

loss carryforwards). This tax deduction is limited to 50 percent of W-2 wages paid by the taxpayer. FSP 109-1 states that an enterprise should account 

for the deduction as a special deduction in accordance with Statement 109. In addition, FSP 109-1 requires that the special deduction be considered 

by an enterprise in (a) measuring deferred taxes when graduated tax rates are a significant factor and (b) assessing whether a valuation allowance is 

necessary as required by paragraph 232 of Statement 109. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of FSP 109-1 will have on our con-

solidated results of operations and financial condition but do not expect it will have a material impact.

FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American 

Jobs  Creation  Act  of  2004”  (“FSP  109-2”),  provides  guidance  under  SFAS  No.  109,  “Accounting  for  Income  Taxes,”  with  respect  to  recording  the 

potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Jobs Act”) on income tax expense and deferred tax 

liabilities. The Jobs Act was enacted on October 22, 2004. FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period 

adopted by the European Union (“EU”). Under the Directive, the financing of historical waste held by private households is to be borne collectively by 

producers that are selling in the market during each measurement period (to be defined by each EU-member country). The volume of equipment that 

qualifies as historical waste that those producers have sold in the market prior to the measurement period is not considered. Producers will be required 

to contribute proportionately based on their participation in the market (for example, in proportion to their respective shares of the market by type 

of equipment). However, the exact method to be used to compute the respective proportions to be contributed by producers will be determined by 

each EU-member country. For commercial users, the waste management obligation for historical equipment (products put on the market on or prior 

to August 13, 2005) remains with these entities until the equipment is replaced. FSP 143-1 is required to be applied to the later of the first reporting 

period ending after June 8, 2005 or the date of the Directive’s adoption into law by the applicable EU member countries in which we have significant 

operations. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of FSP 143-1 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial 

condition. Such effects will depend on the respective laws adopted by the EU member countries.

58
58

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

59
59

Note 3 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets 
We are composed of two operating segments (See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements). Under the requirements of SFAS 142, “Goodwill 

Besides goodwill, our intangible assets consist principally of distribution rights, patents, and trademarks, purchased technologies and capitalized 

software costs. Capitalized amounts related to patents represent external legal costs for the application and maintenance of patents. Intangible as-

and Intangible Assets”, the unit of accounting for goodwill is at a level of reporting referred to as a “reporting unit.” SFAS 142 defines a reporting unit 

sets are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit, ranging from two to ten years.

as either (1) an operating segment — as defined in SFAS 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” or (2) one level 

below an operating segment — referred to as a component. Our domestic and international components are “reporting units” within the operating 
segment “Core Business”. SimpleDevices is the other operating segment and is a “reporting unit” as well.

Goodwill for the domestic operations was generated from the acquisition of a remote control company in 1998. Goodwill for international opera-

tions resulted from the acquisition of remote control distributors in the UK in 1998, Spain in 1999 and France in 2000. We acquired SimpleDevices in 

2004, and of the total purchase price, approximately $7.1 million was allocated to goodwill.

Goodwill information for each reporting unit is listed below: 

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Core Business Segment

  Domestic 

International* 

SimpleDevices 

Total Goodwill 

December 31, 2005 

December 31, 2004

$ 

1,191 

$ 

1,191

2,117 

3,308 

7,123 

2,318

3,509

7,146

$  10,431 

$  10,655

*The difference in international goodwill reported at December 31, 2005, as compared to the goodwill reported at December 31, 2004, was the result of fluctuations in the foreign currency 
exchange rates used to translate the balance into U.S. dollars.

Information regarding our intangible assets is listed below: 

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Carrying amount: 

  Distribution rights (10 years) 

  Patents (10 years) 

  Trademark and trade names (10 years) 

  Developed and core technology (5 years) 

  Capitalized software (2 years) 

  Other (5-7 years) 

Total carrying amount 

Accumulated amortization:

  Distribution rights 

  Patents 

  Trademark and trade names 

  Developed and core technology 

  Capitalized software 

  Other 

Total accumulated amortization 

Net carrying amount:

  Distribution rights 

  Patents 

  Trademark and trade names 

  Developed and core technology 

  Capitalized software 

  Other 

Total net carrying amount 

December 31, 2005 

December 31, 2004

$ 

340 

$ 

405

4,726 

885 

2,410 

898 

372 

3,945

979

2,410

849

470

$ 

9,631 

$  9,058

$ 

45 

$ 

54

1,816 

1,463

118 

993 

559 

93 

75

429

297

190

$ 

3,624 

$  2,508

$ 

295 

$ 

351

2,910 

767 

1,417 

339 

279 

2,482

904

1,981

552

280

$ 

6,007 

$  6,550

60
60

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

61
61

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization expense for 2005, 2004 and 2003 amounted to approximately $1.1 million, $0.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Estimated amortiza-

The following changes occurred in the allowance for doubtful accounts during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

tion expense related to our existing intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years ended December 31 is as follows (in thousands):

2006 

2007 

2008 

2009 

2010 

Thereafter 

Note 4 — Accounts Receivable 
Accounts receivable consist of the following at December 31, 2005 and 2004: 

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Trade receivable, gross 

Sales tax receivable 

Other 

Allowance for doubtful accounts 

Allowance for sales returns 

Accounts receivable, net 

$  1,627

1,171

1,086

1,019

684

420

$  6,007

2005 

2004

$  45,732 

$  41,546

— 

— 

(2,296) 

(1,575) 

147

19

(1,130)

(1,824)

$  41,861 

$  38,758

Sales Returns:  We record a provision for estimated sales returns and allowances on product sales in the same period as the related revenues are 

recorded. These estimates are based on historical sales returns, analysis of credit memo data and other known factors. The provision recorded for 

ances reduce gross accounts receivable to arrive at accounts receivable, net in the same period the related receivable is recorded. Our contractual 

sales return periods range up to six months. We have no other obligations after delivery of our products other than the associated warranties.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:  Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Our allowance for doubt-

ful accounts is our best estimate of losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make their required payments. We maintain an allowance for 

doubtful accounts based on a variety of factors, including historical experience, length of time receivables are past due, current economic trends and 

changes in customer payment behavior. Also, we record specific provisions for individual accounts when we become aware of a customer’s inability to 

meet its financial obligations to us, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings or deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position. If cir-

cumstances related to a customer change, our estimates of the recoverability of the receivables would be further adjusted, either upward or downward.

estimated sales returns and allowances is deducted from gross sales to arrive at net sales in the period the related revenue is recorded. Sales allow-

Leasehold improvements 

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Year Ended December 31, 2005 

Year Ended December 31, 2004 

Year Ended December 31, 2003 

Note 5 — Inventories 
Inventory, net consisted of the following at December 31, 2005 and 2004: 

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Components 

Finished goods 

Reserve for inventory obsolescence 

Inventory, net 

Note 6 — Equipment, Furniture and Fixtures 
Equipment, furniture and fixtures consisted of the following at December 31, 2005 and 2004:

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Tooling 

Equipment 

Furniture and fixtures 

Balance at  
Beginning of 
Period 

$ 

$ 

$ 

1,130 

2,565 

2,605 

Additions  
Charged to 
Costs and 
Expenses 

Write-offs 

Balance at 
End of 
Period 

$ 

$ 

$ 

2,121 

$ 

(955) 

$  2,296

161 

392 

$ (1,596) 

$  1,130

$ 

(432) 

$  2,565

2005 

2004

$  5,508 

$  8,222

  23,474 

  19,446

  (2,274) 

  (3,806)

$  26,708 

$  23,862

2005 

2004

$  5,618 

$  5,757

5,498 

1,321 

1,104 

5,429

1,280

1,050

  13,541 

  13,516

  (9,189) 

  (9,784)

$  4,352 

$  3,732

Accumulated depreciation 

Equipment, furniture and fixtures, net 

Depreciation expense was $2.3 million, $2.2 million and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Note 7 — Revolving Credit Line 
On September 15, 2003, we entered into a three-year $15.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with Comerica Bank (“Co-

merica”). This Credit Facility expires in September 2006. We are currently involved in negotiations to extend the unsecured revolving credit agreement.

Under the Credit Facility, the interest rate is variable and is based on the bank’s cost of funds or the LIBOR rate plus a fixed margin of 1.25%. The 

interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, using the LIBOR Rate option plus a fixed margin of 1.25%, was 5.64% and 3.67%, respectively. 

We pay a commitment fee ranging from zero to a maximum rate of 1/4 of 1% per year on the unused portion of the credit line depending on the amount 

of our cash investment retained with Comerica during each quarter. Under the terms of this Credit Facility, dividend payments are allowed for up to 

100% of the prior fiscal year’s net income, to be paid within 90 days of year end. We are subject to certain financial covenants related to our net worth, 

quick ratio, and net income. Amounts available for borrowing under this Credit Facility are reduced by the outstanding balance of import letters of 

credit. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, there were no amounts outstanding under this credit facility and no outstanding import letters of credit. 

Furthermore, as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, we were in compliance with all financial covenants required by the Credit Facility.

62
62

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

63
63

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We have authority under this credit facility to acquire up to 1.5 million shares of our common stock in market purchases. Between the date the 

On July 1, 2005, as compensation for the outside directors for the one year period commencing July 1, 2005, we granted each director 5,000 shares 

Credit Facility was executed and December 31, 2005, we have purchased 897,019 shares of our common stock leaving 602,981 remaining shares autho-

of our common stock with an aggregate fair market value of approximately $325,800. These shares have been recorded in a separate component of 

rized to be repurchased under the Credit Facility.

Note 8 — Other Accrued Expenses 
The components of other accrued expenses are listed below (in thousands): 

Accrued sales discounts/rebates 

Accrued sales and VAT taxes 

Accrued freight 

Deferred revenue 

Accrued advertising and marketing 

Accrued warranties 

Other 

Other Accrued Expenses 

  December 31,

2005 

2004

$ 

3,406 

$  2,892

1,325 

1,041 

762 

566 

414 

1,300

832

295

836

183

2,162 

2,334

$ 

9,676 

$  8,672

Note 9 — Financial Instruments 
Our financial instruments consist primarily of investments in cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. 

The carrying value of these instruments approximate fair value because of their short maturities.

Note 10 — Stockholders’ Equity 
Fair Price Provisions and Other Anti-Takeover Measures:  Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, contains certain provisions restrict-

ing business combinations with interested stockholders under certain circumstances and imposing higher voting requirements for the approval of 

certain transactions unless the transaction has been approved by two-thirds of the disinterested directors or the fair price provisions have been met. 

Any of these provisions could delay or prevent a change in control.

Treasury Stock:  During 2005, 2004 and 2003, we repurchased 356,285, 494,998 and 84,437 shares of common stock, respectively on the open market 

at a cost of $6.1 million, $6.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively. These shares are recorded as shares held in treasury at cost. The shares will gener-

ally be held by us for future use as management and the Board of Directors deem appropriate. In addition, some of these shares will be used by us to 

compensate the outside directors of the Company. During 2005, 2004 and 2003 shares totaling 20,000, 9,077 and 7,080, respectively, were issued to 

the outside directors.

stockholders’ equity and are being amortized over their 1-year vesting period. Each calendar quarter, 1/4 of the total stock award will vest and the 

shares will be distributed provided the director has served the entire calendar quarter term. Amortization expense amounted to $162,900 in 2005.

Note 11 — Stock Options 
1993 Stock Incentive Plan:  On January 19, 1993, the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (“1993 Plan”) was approved. Under the 1993 Plan, 400,000 shares of 

common stock are reserved for the granting of incentive and other stock options to officers, key employees and non-affiliated directors. The 1993 Plan 

provided for the granting of incentive and other stock options through January 18, 2003. All options outstanding at the time of termination of the 1993 

Plan shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with their terms. The option price for incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options 

will not be less than the fair market value at the date of grant. The Compensation Committee determined when each option was to expire, but no 

option shall be exercisable more than ten years after the date the option is granted. The 1993 Plan also provides for the award of stock appreciation 

rights subject to terms and conditions specified by the Compensation Committee. No stock appreciation rights have been awarded under this 1993 

Plan. There are no remaining options available for grant under the 1993 Plan.

1995 Stock Incentive Plan:  On May 19, 1995, the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (“1995 Plan”) was approved. Under the 1995 Plan, 800,000 shares of com-

mon stock were available for distribution to our key officers, employees and non-affiliated directors. The 1995 Plan provided for the issuance of stock 

options, stock appreciation rights, performance stock units, or any combination thereof through May 18, 2005, unless otherwise terminated by reso-

lution of our Board of Directors. The option prices for the stock options were equal to the fair market value at the date of grant. The Compensation 

Committee shall determine when each option is to expire, but no option shall be exercisable more than ten years after the date the option is granted. 

No stock appreciation rights or performance stock units have been awarded under this 1995 Plan. There are no remaining options available for grant 

under the 1995 Plan.

1996 Stock Incentive Plan:  On December 1, 1996, the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (“1996 Plan”) was approved. Under the 1996 Plan, 800,000 shares of 

common stock are available for distribution to our key officers and employees. The 1996 Plan provides for the issuance of stock options, stock appre-

ciation rights, performance stock units, or any combination thereof through November 30, 2007, unless otherwise terminated by the resolution of our 

Board of Directors. The option price for the stock options will be equal to the fair market value at the date of grant. The Compensation Committee 

shall determine when each option is to expire, but no option shall be exercisable more than ten years after the date the option is granted. No stock 

appreciation rights or performance stock units have been awarded under this 1996 Plan. There are no remaining options available for grant under the 

1996 Plan.

1998 Stock Incentive Plan:  On May 27, 1998, the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (“1998 Plan”) was approved. Under the 1998 Plan, 630,000 shares of com-

mon stock are available for distribution to our key officers and employees. The 1998 Plan provides for the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation 

rights, performance stock units, or any combination thereof through May 26, 2008, unless otherwise terminated by resolution of our Board of Directors. 

The option price for the stock options will not be less than the fair market value at the date of grant. The Compensation Committee shall determine 

when each option is to expire, but no option shall be exercisable more than ten years after the date the option is granted. No stock appreciation rights 

Stock Awards:  On July 11, 2001, as compensation for the outside directors for the three year period commencing July 1, 2001, we granted each direc-

or performance stock units have been awarded under this 1998 Plan. There are 2,500 remaining options available for grant under the 1998 Plan.

tor shares of our common stock with a fair market value equivalent to approximately $278,833. These shares were recorded in a separate component 

of stockholders’ equity and were amortized over their three-year vesting period. Each calendar quarter, 1/12 of the total stock award vested and the 

shares were distributed provided the director served the entire calendar quarter term. Amortization expense amounted to $42,012 and $105,032 in 

2004 and 2003, respectively. The stock awards to the directors were fully vested as of June 30, 2004.

1999 Stock Incentive Plan:  On January 27, 1999, the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (“1999 Plan”) was approved. Under the 1999 Plan, 630,000 shares of com-

mon stock are available for distribution to our key officers and employees. The 1999 Plan provides for the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation 
rights, performance stock units, or any combination thereof through January 26, 2009, unless otherwise terminated by resolution of our Board of Direc-

tors. The option price for the stock options will not be less than the fair market value at the date of grant. The Compensation Committee shall deter-

On July 1, 2004, as compensation for the outside directors for the one year period commencing July 1, 2004, we granted each director 5,000 shares 

mine when each option is to expire, but no option shall be exercisable more than ten years after the date the option is granted. No stock appreciation 

of our common stock with an aggregate fair market value of approximately $348,523. On July 30, 2004, we filed an S-8 Registration Statement covering 

rights or performance stock units have been awarded under this 1999 Plan. There are 1,500 remaining options available for grant under the 1999 Plan.

all of the shares issued under this plan. These shares were recorded in a separate component of stockholders’ equity and were amortized over their 

1-year vesting period. Each calendar quarter, 1/4 of the total stock award vested and the shares were distributed. Amortization expense amounted to 

$168,700 and $179,823 in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The stock awards to the directors were fully vested as of June 30, 2005.

1999A Stock Incentive Plan:  On October 7, 1999, the 1999A Nonqualified Stock Plan (“1999A Plan”) was approved and on February 1, 2000, the 1999A 

Plan was amended. Under the 1999A Plan, 1,000,000 shares of common stock are available for distribution to our key officers and employees. The 

64
64

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

65
65

  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1999A Plan provides for the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance stock units, or any combination thereof through October 

Significant option groups outstanding at December 31, 2005 and the related weighted average exercise price and life information are listed below:

6, 2009, unless otherwise terminated by resolution of our Board of Directors. The option price for the stock options will not be less than the fair market 

value at the date of grant. The Compensation Committee shall determine when each option is to expire, but no option shall be exercisable more than 

ten years after the date the option is granted. No stock appreciation rights or performance stock units have been awarded under this 1999A Plan. 

There are 10,125 remaining options available for grant under the 1999A Plan.

2002 Stock Incentive Plan:  On February 5, 2002, the 2002 Nonqualified Stock Plan (“2002 Plan”) was approved. Under the 2002 Plan, 1,000,000 shares 

of common stock are available for distribution to our key officers and employees. The 2002 Plan provides for the issuance of stock options, stock ap-

preciation rights, performance stock units, or any combination thereof through February 4, 2012, unless otherwise terminated by resolution of our 

Board of Directors. The option price for the stock options will not be less than the fair market value at the date of grant. The Compensation Committee 

shall determine when each option is to expire, but no option shall be exercisable more than ten years after the date the option is granted. No stock 

appreciation rights or performance stock units have been awarded under this 2002 Plan. There are 37,872 remaining options available for grant under 

the 2002 Plan.

2003 Stock Incentive Plan:  On June 18, 2003, the 2003 Nonqualified Stock Plan (“2003 Plan”) was approved. Under the 2003 Plan, 1,000,000 shares 

of common stock are available for distribution to our key officers and employees. The 2003 Plan provides for the issuance of stock options, stock ap-

preciation rights, performance stock units, or any combination thereof through June 17, 2013, unless otherwise terminated by resolution of our Board 

of Directors. The option price for the stock options will not be less than the fair market value at the date of grant. The Compensation Committee 

shall determine when each option is to expire, but no option shall be exercisable more than ten years after the date the option is granted. No stock 

appreciation rights or performance stock units have been awarded under this 2003 Plan. There are 91,500 remaining options available for grant under 

the 2003 Plan.

Vesting periods for the above referenced stock incentive plans range from three to four years.

The following table summarizes the changes in the number of shares of common stock under option:

Options Outstanding 

Options Exercisable

Range of  
Exercise Prices 

$  3.19  to $ 4.97 

  5.81  to   7.50 

  8.45  to   9.83 

  10.92  to  13.39 

  14.85  to  22.06 

$  3.19  to $ 22.06 

Number  
Outstanding  
At 12/31/05  
(000) 

175 

144 

476 

766 

1,590 

3,151 

Weighted-Average 
Remaining Years of  
Contractual Life 

Weighted-Average 
Exercise  
Price 

2.58 

2.99 

6.87 

6.23 

6.99 

6.36 

$ 

4.82 

7.20 

8.66 

11.88 

17.65 

Number 
Exercisable 
At 12/31/05 
(000) 

175 

144 

343 

454 

827 

Weighted-Average 
Exercise 
Price

$ 

4.82

7.20

8.65

11.41

18.26

$  13.70 

1,943 

$  12.94

Note 12 — Significant Customers and Suppliers 
Significant  Customers:    We  had  sales  to  one  significant  customer  of  $22.2  million,  $17.5  million,  and  $18.1  million  representing  12.2%,  11.0%,  and 

15.0% of our total net sales for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Trade receivables with this customer amounted to  

$2.1 million and $2.4 million or 5.1% and 5.9% of our total accounts receivable at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In addition, we had sales 

to a customer and its sub-contractors that, when combined, totaled $30.0 million, $16.4 million, and $4.6 million, accounting for 16.6%, 10.4%, and 

3.8% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Trade receivables with this customer and its sub-contractors 

amounted to $3.3 million and $2.4 million, or 7.8% and 5.7%, of our total accounts receivable at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The future 

loss of these customers or any key customer, either in the United States or abroad, due to the financial weakness or bankruptcy of any such customer 

or our inability to obtain orders or maintain our order volume with our major customers, may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results 

2005 

2004 

2003

of operations and cash flows.

Outstanding at beginning of year 

3,039 

$ 

12.79 

2,662 

$ 

12.32 

2,976 

$  12.00

Shares 
(000) 

Weighted-Average 
Exercise Price 

Shares 
(000) 

Weighted-Average 
Exercise Price 

Shares 
(000) 

Weighted-Average 
Exercise Price

631 

(290) 

(229) 

17.40 

9.89 

15.33 

702 

(209) 

(116) 

13.94 

9.10 

15.95 

119 

(370) 

(63) 

10.60

8.96

13.92

Significant Suppliers:  We purchase components and finished product from multiple sources. During 2005, one source provided over ten percent (10%) 

of our inventory purchases. Purchases from this significant supplier amounted to $35.5 million, or 33.9%, of total inventory purchases during 2005. 

Purchases with the same significant supplier amounted to $25.5 million, or 28.2%, of total inventory purchases in 2004. During 2004 there was one ad-

ditional significant supplier with purchases that amounted to $9.5 million, or 10.5%, of total inventory purchases.

Accounts  payable  with  the  aforementioned  significant  supplier  amounted  to  $6.5  million,  representing  28.5%  of  the  total  accounts  payable  at  

December 31, 2005. Accounts payable for the same supplier amounted to $5.9 million, representing 33.8% of the total accounts payable at December 

3,151 

$ 

13.70 

3,039 

$ 

12.79 

2,662 

$  12.32

31, 2004. The additional significant supplier had accounts payable of $2.0 million or 11.6% of the total accounts payable at December 31, 2004.

1,943 

$ 

12.94 

1,828 

$ 

12.58 

1,668 

$  11.79

Granted  

Exercised 

Expired and/or forfeited 

Outstanding at end of year 

Options exercisable at 

year-end  

During 2005, common stock options were modified for two employees, one modification was part of a severance agreement and the other modifi-

cation resulted from an employee’s death. The total number of options modified was 20,500, which resulted in new measurement dates. The difference 

between the exercise price and the fair value of the common stock on the new measurement dates for the options totaled $73,863. As a result, $73,863 

was charged to non-cash stock-based compensation.

During 2003, common stock options were modified for two employees as part of their severance agreements. The total number of options modi-

fied was 92,647, which resulted in new measurement dates. The difference between the exercise price and the fair value of the common stock on the 

new measurement dates for the options totaled $341,282. As a result, $341,282 was charged to non-cash stock-based compensation.

66
66

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

67
67

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Note 13 — Leases 
We lease office and warehouse space and certain office equipment under operating leases that expire at various dates through December 31, 2012. Rent-

al expense for our operating leases was $1.7 million, $1.8 million, and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The following table summarizes future minimum non-cancelable operating lease payments with initial terms greater than one year at December 31, 2005:

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Year ending December 31: 

2006 

2007 

2008 

2009 

2010 

Thereafter 

Total lease commitments 

Amount

$  1,455

  1,377

947

483

428

428

$  5,118

Note 14 — Employee Benefit Plans 
We maintain a retirement and profit sharing plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code for all of our domestic employees that meet certain 

qualifications. Participants in the plan may elect to contribute from 1% to 15% of their annual salary to the plan. We match 50% of the participants’ 

contributions in the form of newly issued shares of our common stock. We may also make other discretionary contributions to the plan. The expense 

recorded for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 amounted to $0.6 million, $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

Note 15 — Other Income (Expense), net 
“Other income (expense), net” in the Consolidated Income Statements consisted of the following:

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Year Ended December 31,

2 0 0 5  

2 0 0 4  

2 0 0 3

Net gain (loss) on foreign currency exchange transactions 

$  2,107 

$ 

(152) 

$ 

344

Write-down of investment 

Other income (loss) 

Other income (expense), net 

Note 16 — Income Taxes 
In 2005, 2004, and 2003, pre-tax income was attributed to the following jurisdictions:

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Domestic operations 

Foreign operations 

  Total 

(3) 

48 

(357) 

(31) 

—

(6)

$  2,152 

$ 

(540) 

$ 

338

Year Ended December 31, 

2 0 0 5  

2 0 0 4  

2 0 0 3

$  6,206 

$ 

4,488 

$  6,002

8,468 

9,235 

  3,493

$  14,674 

$  13,723 

$  9,495

The provision for income taxes charged to operations was as follows: 

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Current tax expense/(benefit):

  U.S. federal 

  State and local 

  Foreign 

  Total current 

Deferred tax expense/(benefit): 

  U.S. federal 

  State and local 

  Foreign 

  Total deferred 

  Total provision 

Net deferred tax assets were comprised of the following at December 31: 

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Deferred tax assets:

Inventory reserves 

  Allowance for doubtful accounts 

  Capitalized research costs 

  Capitalized inventory costs 

  Net operating losses 

  Amortization of intangibles 

  Accrued liabilities 

Income tax credits 

  Depreciation 

  Other 

 Total deferred tax assets 

Deferred tax liability:

  Depreciation 

Intangibles assets 

  Other 

 Total deferred tax liabilities 

Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance 

Less: Valuation allowance 

Net deferred tax assets 

Year Ended December 31,

2005 

2004 

2003

$  1,382 

$  2,572 

$  2,438

280 

3,311 

4,973 

460 

(363) 

(97) 

— 

216 

1,515 

4,303 

564 

(200) 

(58) 

306 

157

1,482

4,077

(715)

(46)

(88)

(849)

$  4,973 

$  4,609 

$  3,228

2005 

2004

$ 

514 

$  1,003

59 

885 

727 

4,798 

645 

837 

748 

338 

285 

68

1,287

574

5,051

686

511

265

24

184

$  9,836 

$  9,653

— 

(8)

(925) 

  (1,068)

(193) 

—

  (1,118) 

  (1,076)

8,718 

(620) 

8,577

(536)

$  8,098 

$  8,041

68
68

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

69
69

The deferred tax valuation allowance increased $0.1 million, $0.4 million, and $0.03 million during 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the applicable U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to 

During 2005, the Internal Revenue Service began an audit of the December 31, 2002 and 2003 tax years. We are also currently under appeals with 

pre-tax income from operations as a result of the following:

i n   t h o u s a n d s  

Tax provision at statutory U.S. rate 

Increase (decrease) in tax provision resulting from:

  State and local taxes, net 

  Foreign tax rate differential 

  Nondeductible items 

In-process R&D 

  Federal valuation allowance 

Federal research and development credits 

Other 

Tax provision 

Year Ended December 31,

2005 

2004 

2003

$  4,989 

$  4,666 

$  3,228

(83) 

335 

50 

— 

1 

(601) 

282 

236 

184 

34 

82 

122 

(521) 

(194) 

80

172

29

—

—

(282)

1

$  4,973 

$  4,609 

$  3,228

the California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000. In addition, the passing of the statute of limitations for 

the state tax years 1997 and 1998 eliminated the need for certain previously recorded tax reserves. Accordingly, we reversed the related previously 

accrued taxes, reducing the tax provision for 2005 by approximately $0.1 million.

Note 17 – Earnings Per Share 
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of our common 

shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common 

shares and dilutive potential common shares, which includes the dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock grants. Dilutive potential common 

shares for all the periods presented are computed utilizing the treasury stock method. In the computation of diluted earnings per common share for 

the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, approximately 999,506, 988,250 and 1,031,125 stock options, respectively, with exercise prices 

greater than the average market price of the underlying common stock, were excluded because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

Earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were calculated as follows (in thousands, except per-share amounts):

During 2004, pursuant to our purchase of SimpleDevices, pretax book income reflects the write-off of IPR&D expenditures and amortization of certain 

Basic

Net Income 

acquired intangibles. The tax effects of intangibles, other than goodwill, are included in deferred tax liabilities. In connection with the acquisition, we 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding 

established a $1.1 million deferred tax liability, and a $5.6 million deferred tax asset. The net result was an increase to Goodwill of $4.5 million.

At December 31, 2005, we had federal and state Research and Experimentation (“R&E”) income tax credit carryforwards of approximately $0.1 mil-

lion and $0.6 million, respectively. The federal R&E income tax credits expire in 2025. The state R&E income tax credits do not have an expiration date.

At December 31, 2005, we had federal, state and foreign net operating losses of approximately $9.9 million, $9.5 million and $2.6 million, respec-

tively. All of the federal and state net operating loss carryforwards were acquired as part of the acquisition of SimpleDevices. The federal and state 

net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2020 and 2011, respectively. Approximately $1.1 million of the foreign net operating losses begin to 

expire in 2007, approximately $.2 million expire in 2020 and the remaining $1.3 million of foreign net operating losses have an unlimited carryforward. 

Basic earnings per share 

Diluted

Net Income 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding for basic 

Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding on a diluted basis 

At December 31, 2005, a valuation allowance of approximately $0.5 million has been provided on certain foreign net operating losses.

Diluted earnings per share 

December 31, 2005 

December 31, 2004  December 31, 2003

Year Ended

$  9,701 

$  9,114 

$  6,267

  13,462 

  13,567 

  13,703

$ 

0.72 

$ 

0.67 

$ 

0.46

$  9,701 

$  9,114 

$  6,267

  13,462 

  13,567 

  13,703

530 

533 

304

  13,992 

  14,100 

  14,007

$ 

0.69 

$ 

0.65 

$ 

0.45

Internal Revenue Code Section 382 places certain limitations on the annual amount of net operating loss carryforwards that can be utilized if certain 

changes to a company’s ownership occur. Our acquisition of SimpleDevices was a change in ownership pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue 

Code, and the federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of SimpleDevices (approximately $10.0 million and $9.5 million, respectively) are lim-

ited but considered realizable in future periods. The annual limitation is as follows: Approximately $1.3 million for 2006 through 2008 and approximately 

$0.6 million thereafter.

As of December 31, 2005, we believed it was more likely than not that certain deferred tax assets related to the impairment of the investment in a 

private company (a capital asset) would not be realized due to uncertainties as to the timing and amounts of future capital gains. Accordingly, a valua-

tion allowance of approximately $0.1 million was recorded as of December 31, 2005 (See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements).

During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 we recognized a credit to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to income taxes 

payable of $0.9 million, $0.5 million, and $0.4 million, respectively, related to the tax benefit from the exercises of non-qualified stock options under our 

stock option plans.

The undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. Accordingly, no provision for US federal and 

state income taxes or foreign withholding taxes has been provided on such undistributed earnings. Determination of the potential amount of unrec-

ognized deferred US income tax liability and foreign withholding taxes is not practicable because of the complexities associated with its hypothetical 

calculation; however, unrecognized foreign tax credits would be available to reduce some portion of the U.S. liability.

Note 18 — Business Segments and Foreign Operations 
Industry Segments:  We have two reportable segments, Core Business and SimpleDevices. In our Core Business segment we have developed a broad 

line of easy-to-use, pre-programmed universal wireless control products and audio-video accessories that are marketed to enhance home entertain-

ment systems. The various channels of distribution utilized by our Core Business segment include international retail, private label, OEMs, cable and 

satellite service providers and companies in the computing industry. SimpleDevices, based in San Mateo, California, develops software and firmware 

solutions that can enable devices such as TVs, set-top boxes, stereos, automotive audio systems, cell phones and other consumer electronic products 

to wirelessly connect and interact with home networks and interactive services to deliver digital entertainment and information.

Factors Used to Identify Reportable Segments:  SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, defines an operating 

segment, in part, as a component of an enterprise whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker to make deci-

sions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance. Operating segments may be aggregated only to the limited extent 

permitted by the standard.

During the fourth quarter of 2004 we purchased SimpleDevices, Inc. for approximately $12.8 million in cash, including direct acquisition costs, and 

a potential performance-based payment of our unregistered common stock, if certain future financial objectives are achieved.

70
70

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

71
71

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As a result of the performance based incentive and other factors, management began to review SimpleDevices’ discrete operating results on a 

Geographic Information  Our sales to external customers and long-lived tangible assets by geographic area are presented below (in thousands):

regular basis. This review and factors including product differences, current management structure, distribution methods, and economic character-

istics, supported our conclusion as of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 that SimpleDevices is a reportable segment in accordance with 

SFAS 131. In the future, as the integration of SimpleDevices’ operations continues and the performance based incentive expires, we may or may not 

determine that SimpleDevices continues to be a reportable segment in accordance with SFAS 131.

Measurement of Profit or Loss of Segment Assets:  The disaggregated financial results of our reportable segments have been prepared using a man-

agement approach, which is consistent with the basis and manner in which we internally disaggregate financial information for the purposes of making 

internal operating and resource allocation decisions. The accounting policies of our reportable segments are the same as those described in the sum-

mary of significant accounting policies except that the segment information does not include a full allocation of corporate overhead costs between 

the SimpleDevices and Core Business segments.

Segment Income (Loss) and Assets:

Year Ended December 31, 2005 

Net sales 

Depreciation and amortization 

Research and development 

Interest income 

Income before income taxes 

Assets 

Year Ended Decem ber 31, 2004 

Net sales 

Depreciation and amortization 

Research and development 

Interest income 

Income before income taxes 

Assets 

Core Business 

SimpleDevices 

Total

$  179,816 

$  1,533 

$  181,349

3,204 

6,158 

845 

498 

422 

— 

3,702

6,580

845

18,628 

  (3,954) 

14,674

$  144,566 

$  1,753 

$  146,319

Core Business 

SimpleDevices (1) 

Total

$  157,549 

$ 

831 

$  158,380

2,969 

5,625 

723 

124 

240 

— 

3,093

5,865

723

14,273 

(550) 

13,723

$  134,589 

$  5,811 

$  140,400

(1): The financial results of SimpleDevices for the year ended December 31, 2004 contain only the results of operations since the date of acquisition. The segmented results of operations 
for the year ended December 31, 2003 are not presented here as the results of the Core Business segment for 2003 correspond to the consolidated income reported in the consolidated 
financialstatements included in this report.

Year Ended December 31, 

Net sales

  United States 

International:

  United Kingdom 

  Asia 

Spain 

  Germany 

France 

Switzerland 

South Africa 

  All other 

Total international 

Total net sales 

December 31, 

Long-Lived Assets

  United States 

  All other countries 

2005 

2004 

2003

$ 

95,252 

$ 

75,121 

$ 

65,891

22,977 

18,773 

6,484 

7,357 

5,852 

4,689 

3,685 

16,280 

86,097 

26,395 

18,105

9,068 

10,535 

8,620 

7,021 

3,194 

1,793 

16,633 

83,259 

5,249

5,237

6,679

4,911

755

798

12,843

54,577

$  181,349 

$  158,380 

$  120,468

2005 

2004 

2003

$ 

3,137 

$ 

2,956 

$ 

3,002

1,618 

3,711 

1,917

$ 

4,755 

$ 

6,667 

$ 

4,919

Specific identification was the basis used for attributing revenues from external customers to individual countries.

Note 19 – Related Party Transactions 
In August 2001, we entered into a 30-month consulting agreement with one of our former directors, under which the former director received $600,000 for 

services rendered. Amounts paid under this agreement were $200,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. The agreement expired in February 2004.

In April 1999, we provided a non-recourse interest bearing secured loan to our chief executive officer. The loan in the amount of $200,000 bears 

interest at the rate of 5.28% per annum, with interest payable annually to us on each December 15th. The loan is collateralized by the primary resi-

dence purchased and the principal is payable on the earlier of (i) December 15, 2007, (ii) within twelve months following a demand from us but only in 

the event the executive officer ceases being our employee or in the event of a default under the loan; or (iii) on the closing of a sale or transfer of the 

property. This related party note receivable is included in other assets on our balance sheet at December 31, 2005 and 2004.

72
72

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

73
73

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Note 20 — Contingencies 
Product Warranties:  We warrant our products against defects in materials and workmanship arising during normal use. We service warranty claims 

There are no other material pending legal proceedings, other than litigation that is incidental to the ordinary course of our business, to which 

we or any of our subsidiaries is a party or of which our respective property is the subject. We do not believe that any of the claims made against us in 

directly through our customer service department or contracted third-party warranty repair facilities. Our warranty period ranges up to three years. 

any of the pending matters have merit and, except for the employment matter of which we intend to seek settlement, we intend to vigorously defend 

We provide for estimated product warranty expenses, which are included in cost of goods sold, as we sell the related products. Because warranty 

ourselves against them. As of December 31, 2004, because incurring a loss relating to the employment matter was both probable and estimable, a loss 

expense is a forecast based on the best available information, mostly historical claims experience, actual claim costs may differ from the amounts 
provided. The change in the liability for product warranties is presented below (in thousands):

Description 

Year ended December 31, 2005 

Year ended December 31, 2004 

Year ended December 31, 2003 

Balance at 
Beginning of 
Period 

$  183 

$ 

$ 

95 

95 

Accruals for 
Warranties 
Issued During 
the Period 

$ 

$ 

$ 

443 

285 

181 

Settlements  
(in Cash or in 
Kind) During 
the Period 

$ 

$ 

$ 

(212) 

(197) 

(181) 

Balance at 
End of 
Period

$ 

$ 

$ 

414

183

95

Litigation:  In 2002, one of our subsidiaries (One For All S.A.S.) brought an action against a former distributor of the subsidiary’s products seeking a 

contingency of $191,000 was recorded and still remains on the books at December 31, 2005.

We maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance which insures our individual directors and officers against certain claims such as those al-

leged in the above lawsuits, as well as attorney’s fees and related expenses incurred in connection with the defense of such claims.

Note 21 – SimpleDevices, Inc. 
From October 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, we acquired over 99% of the outstanding shares of SimpleDevices, Inc. for approximately $12.8 

million in cash, including direct acquisition costs of $0.3 million. We intend to purchase the remaining shares when the sellers are located. The trans-

action also includes a potential performance-based payment of unregistered common stock, if certain future financial objectives are realized, which 

has not been reflected as part of the purchase price as of December 31, 2005 since it is not probable such objectives will be achieved. The results of 

SimpleDevices’ operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.

recovery of accounts receivable. The distributor filed a counterclaim against our subsidiary seeking payment for amounts allegedly owed for adminis-

Pro forma results (unaudited):  The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of our operations and Sim-

trative and other services rendered by the distributor for our subsidiary. In January 2005, the parties agreed to include claims between the distributor 

pleDevices as if the acquisition had occurred at January 1, 2004. An adjustment of $84 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2004 has been made 

and two of our other subsidiaries, namely, Universal Electronics BV (“UEBV”) and One For All Iberia SL, such that the proceeding covers all claims 

to the combined results of operations, reflecting primarily the amortization of purchased intangible assets, net of tax. The pro-forma net income does 

and counterclaims between the various parties and further agreed that before any judgments are to be paid, all matters of conflict between the vari-

not reflect the write-off of $240,000 of acquired in-process research and development of SimpleDevices.

ous parties would be concluded. These additional claims involve nonpayment for products and damages resulting from the wrongful termination of 

agency agreements. On March 15, 2005, the court in one of the litigation matters brought by the distributor against one of the subsidiaries, rendered 

judgment against the subsidiary and awarded damages and costs to the distributor in the amount of approximately $102,000. The subsidiary has ap-

pealed this decision and asked the court to stay the execution of the judgment as it is part of the overall litigation matters between the various parties. 

Pro forma results for the year ended December 31, 2004 are listed below (in thousands):

Revenue: 

Net income: 

In February 2006, the court denied our subsidiary’s request and it has filed an appeal seeking to stay this judgment. The amount of this judgment was 

Basic and diluted net income per share:

charged to operations during the second quarter of 2005 and is recorded as a liability as of December 31, 2005. With respect to the remaining matters 

before the court, the parties met with the court appointed expert in February 2006, and we expect the expert to finalize and file his pre-trial report to 

the court, the filing of which is expected to occur during the quarter ending June 30, 2006. We will continue to seek a settlement of all of these mat-

ters, but if settlement is not possible, each of the subsidiaries will continue to disagree with the allegations of the former distributor and will vigorously 

defend itself against the counterclaims.

  Basic 

  Diluted 

The unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the consolidated results of operations that would have 

been achieved had the acquisition actually been completed as of the dates presented, and should not be taken as a projection of the future consoli-

In 2003, an ex-employee of one of our subsidiaries brought an action against our subsidiary seeking damages in the amount of approximately 

dated results of our operations.

$191,000 for wrongful termination. The subsidiary disagreed with these allegations and vigorously defended itself against this claim. In January 2005, 

judgment was rendered for the ex-employee awarding him approximately $26,000 in damages. In March 2005, our subsidiary paid this judgment. In 

February 2005, the ex-employee filed a notice of appeal, which has been scheduled for hearing in late 2006. It is our intention to seek a settlement of 

this matter with the ex-employee. If a settlement is not possible, our subsidiary will again vigorously defend itself.

On January 7, 2004, James D. Lyon, Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Computrex, Inc. (“Trustee”) filed an action against us alleging that we 

received preferential treatment in connection with certain payments amounting to $528,000 made on our behalf by Computrex to our freight carriers. 

In addition to seeking a return of the alleged preferential payments, the Trustee has asked for costs, and pre- and post-judgment interest. We have not 
yet answered this complaint and will not need to do so as this action is currently in abeyance while the Trustee appeals an adverse ruling against it in 

another matter having facts similar to those in the Trustee’s action against us. In April 2005, an appellate court affirmed the ruling against the Trustee 

in this other matter. If and when we answer, we intend to deny all of the material allegations made against us and defend this matter vigorously and we 

will continue to pursue the proof of claim we filed in May 2002 in the amount of $106,000 with the Bankruptcy Court against the bankruptcy estate of 

Computrex seeking a return of freight charges paid to Computrex for which it failed to remit to our freight carriers.

Potential Performance-Based Payment of Unregistered Common Stock:  On October 1, 2004, in conjunction with the purchase of SimpleDevices, we 

executed a Stock Option Exchange Agreement (“agreement”) with the holders of non-vested options to purchase the common stock of SimpleDev-

ices. The terms of this agreement included the cancellation of these non-vested options. In consideration for this cancellation we extended the right 

to receive 65,842 shares of Universal Electronic Inc. unregistered stock contingent on meeting certain performance based criteria, including specified 

operating income levels through the years ending December 31, 2005 and 2006. As of December 31, 2005 the probability that these performance tar-

gets will be met is remote. As such, the performance-based payment has not been reflected as part of the purchase price as of December 31, 2005.

74
74

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

75
75

$ 159,760

$ 

7,474

$ 

$ 

0.55

0.53

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reconciliation of Fourth Quarter and YTD 2005 Pro Forma, GAAP Results

The following table reconciles UEI’s pro forma financial results for the fourth quarter and YTD 2005, which excludes the write down of a certain receiv-

able as well as the related tax effect, to its actual financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

i n   t h o u s a n d s ,   e x c e p t   p e r   s h a r e   a m o u n t s   ( u n a u d i t e d )  

2005 

2004 

2005 

2004

Net income, as reported according to GAAP   

$  3,523 

$  3,720 

$  9,701 

$  9,114

Three Months Ended December 31,  

Three Months Ended December 31,

Plus: 
  Balance write down 
Less:  

Tax effect of excluding the write down       

Pro forma net income 

GAAP earnings per share 
  Diluted 

Pro forma earnings per share: 
  Diluted 

Shares used in computing earnings per share:  
  Diluted 

0 

201 

0 

0 

1,592  

0 

0

0

$  3,724 

$  3,720 

$  11,293 

$  9,114

$ 

0.25 

$ 

0.26 

$ 

0.69 

$ 

0.65

$ 

0.27 

$ 

0.26 

$ 

0.81 

$ 

0.65

  13,984 

  14,206 

  13,992 

  14,100

Note 22 – Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) 
Summarized quarterly financial data for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 is presented below:

i n   t h o u s a n d s ,   e x c e p t   p e r   s h a r e   a m o u n t s  

 March 31, 

June 30, (2) 

September 30, 

December 31, (3)

2005 

Net sales 

Gross profit  

Operating income 

Net income 

Earnings per share (1):

  Basic 

  Diluted 

Shares used in computing earnings per share:

  Basic 

  Diluted 

Net sales 

Gross profit  

Operating income  

Net income 

Earnings per share (1):

  Basic 

  Diluted 

Shares used in computing earnings per share:

  Basic 

  Diluted 

$ 

41,502 

$  44,322 

$  46,206 

$  49,319

15,716 

15,718 

16,994 

18,699

1,684 

1,856 

974 

1,545 

3,671 

2,777 

5,348

3,523

$ 

$ 

0.14 

0.13 

$ 

$ 

0.11 

0.11 

$ 

$ 

0.21 

0.20 

$ 

$ 

0.26

0.25

13,518 

14,082 

13,467 

13,983 

13,391 

13,918 

13,472

13,984

2004

 March 31, 

June 30, (2) 

  September 30, 

 December 31, (3)

$ 

32,611 

$  34,011 

$  40,047 

$  51,711

12,664 

12,879 

15,793 

20,244

2,080 

1,778 

2,417 

1,688 

3,296 

1,928 

5,747

3,720

$ 

$ 

0.13 

0.13 

$ 

$ 

0.13 

0.12 

$ 

$ 

0.14 

0.14 

$ 

$ 

0.27

0.26

13,715 

14,052 

13,483 

13,889 

13,496 

14,029 

13,580

14,206

(1) The earnings per common share calculations for each of the quarters were based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period, and the sum of the 
quarters may not be equal to the full year earnings per common share amounts.

(2) The comparability of the financial data for the second quarter of 2005 is affected by a one-time $1.6 million write down of a balance due from a former European distributor.

(3) The comparability of the financial data for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 is affected by the October 1, 2004 acquisition of SimpleDevices, Inc. and the inclusion of their  
financial results.

76
76

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

77
77

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Controls And Procedures 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Disclosure Controls and Procedures:  Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(d) defines “disclosure controls and procedures” to mean controls and procedures of 

a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Ex-

change Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. The definition 
further states that disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information re-

quired to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s 

management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely 

decisions regarding required disclosure.

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive and principal 

financial officers, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this 

report. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures 

were effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in 

reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities 

and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:  Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate in-

ternal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our man-

agement, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, we evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting 

based on the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our 

evaluation under this framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2005.

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Universal Electronics, Inc.

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Universal Electronics, Inc. Management’s Report on Internal Control Over 
Financial Reporting, that Universal Electronics, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on 

criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issues by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission 

(COSO). Universal Electronics, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assess-

ment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an 

opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards 

require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was main-

tained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s 

assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consid-

ered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial 

reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s 

internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, 

accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are re-

corded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and 

expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide 

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 has been audited by Grant 

reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could 

Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its attestation report which is included herein.

have a material effect on the financial statements.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:  There have been no changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any 

internal controls subsequent to the date the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial officer) completed their evaluation.

evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that 

the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Universal Electronics, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of De-

cember 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Com-

mittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, Universal Electronics, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, 

effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework 

issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated bal-

ance sheet of Universal Electronics, Inc. as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash 

flows for the year then ended, and our report dated March 10, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Grant Thornton LLP 

Irvine, California

March 10, 2006

78
78

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

79
79

Corporate Information

DIRECTORS

OFFICERS

OFFICERS (COnTInuED)

CORpORaTE OFFICE

FORm 10-K 

Paul D. Arling
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
Universal Electronics Inc.

Cypress, California

Satjiv S. Chahil2, 3
Chairman
QuickOffice

Los Altos, California

Bruce A. Henderson1, 2
Chairman and 
Chief Executive Officer
Imation Corporation

Oakdale, Minnesota

William C. Mulligan1, 3
Managing Director
Primus Venture Partners, Inc.

Cleveland, Ohio

J.C. Sparkman1, 2, 3
Retired Executive
Vice President and 
Chief Operating Officer
TCI

Denver, Colorado

1  Member, Audit Committee
2 

 Member, Compensation  

Committee

3 

 Member, Corporate  

Governance & Nominating  

Committee

Universal Electronics Inc.  

is an equal opportunity employer

Paul D. Arling
Chairman and  
Chief Executive Officer

Robert P. Lilleness
President and  
Chief Operating Officer

Patrick H. Hayes
Vice President of Core  
Technology Development

Universal Electronics Inc.
6101 Gateway Drive
Cypress, California  90630

Em Klaver
Vice President of Business  
Development, Europe

Locations:
6101 Gateway Drive
Cypress, California  90630

Richard A. Firehammer, Jr.
Senior Vice President,  
General Counsel, and 
Secretary

Paul J.M. Bennett
Senior Vice President and 
Managing Director, Europe

Pam Price
Senior Vice President of Sales

Patrick Lems
Vice President of Corporate 
Development, Europe

Jacques Mathijsen
Vice President of Product, 
Planning and Strategy, Europe

Brian Minor
Vice President of OEM &  
CEDIA Sales, North America

Lou Hughes
President and General  
Manager, SimpleDevices, Inc.

Olav Pouw 
Vice President of OEM/Cable/
Satellite Sales, Europe

Dann Vidana
Vice President of Operations

Graham Williams
Vice President of 
Core Engineering

Ramzi S. Ammari
Vice President of  
Product Development

Tony J. Boer
Vice President of Retail Sales, 
Europe

Bryan Hackworth
Chief Accounting Officer and 
Corporate Controller  

1864 Enterprise Parkway West
Twinsburg, Ohio  44087

The Netherlands
Universal Electronics BV
Institutenweg 21 7521 PH 
Enschede, Netherlands

InvESTOR InFORmaTIOn

Annual Meeting
4:00 p.m. PT - June 13, 2006

Universal Electronics Inc.
6101 Gateway Drive
Cypress, California  90630

Independent Registered 
Public Accounting Firm
Grant Thornton LLP
Irvine, California

Registrar & Transfer Agent
Computershare Investor  
Services, LLC
2 North LaSalle Street 

Chicago, Illinois  60602

Phone (312) 588-4991

Any stockholder who desires 
a copy of the Company’s 
2005 Annual Report on Form 
10-K filed with the Securities 
and Exchange Commission 
may obtain a copy (excluding 
exhibits) without charge by 
addressing a request to:

Investor Relations
Universal Electronics Inc.
6101 Gateway Drive
Cypress, California  90630

A charge equal to the repro-
duction cost will be made if 
the exhibits are requested.
Universal’s Internet address 
is www.uei.com. Universal 
makes available through its 
Internet Web site its annual 
report on Form 10-K. Investors 
can also obtain copies of our 
SEC filings from the SEC Web 
site at www.sec.gov

a
i
n
r
o
f
i
l
a
c

,
a
c
i
n
o
m

a
t
n
a
s

:

n
a
m
e
d

n
a
v
.
c

:

y
b

d
e
c
u
d
o
r
p

d
n
a

d
e
n
g
i
s
e
d

80
80

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report
universal electronics 2005 annual report

81
81

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
universal electronics 6101 gateway drive
cypress, ca 90630

www.uei.com

82

universal electronics 2005 annual report

universal electronics 2005 annual report

pB