URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
2017 ANNUAL REPORT
To Our Shareholders,
Investors will remember 2017 as the year brick-and-mortar retailers experienced an existential crisis.
Amazon and other e-commerce providers are disrupting the industry, creating chaos throughout much of
the sector and pressuring retailers and landlords to evolve. The market is separating the winners from the
losers. Urban Edge is a winner because our high quality real estate consistently attracts the best tenants,
our growth is primarily derived from investing in our existing assets and our strong balance sheet provides
ample capital for funding redevelopment and acquisitions.
First, our concentration in metro New York, the nation’s most densely-populated market, is a powerful
draw for retailers. Our top tenants include many of today’s most successful retailers including Home
Depot, Walmart, Costco, TJX, ShopRite and Whole Foods (now owned by Amazon). Our shopping
centers generate strong sales with grocers producing nearly $800 per square foot - the highest reported
number in the sector. The desirability of our centers is evidenced by our 98% same property occupancy
rate.
Second, improving our existing shopping centers is our most significant growth opportunity. We are
executing a $300 million program to renovate and remerchandise our properties and adding retailers like
ShopRite, Sprouts, Marshalls, Homesense, Burlington, Ulta, Five Below, Starbucks and Chick-fil-A. We
expect to earn an attractive 8%+ unlevered return while increasing traffic, sales and rents.
Many of our properties are ripe for redevelopment due to their irreplaceable locations, age, physical
condition, anchor lease maturities, below-market rents and retail demand. A prime example is Bruckner
Commons where ShopRite is opening its first store in the Bronx and where Burlington is adding a new
two-story location. Bruckner is being transformed from an unattractive, dated center into an appealing
shopping destination with an exciting mix of food, apparel and services that will cater to the 700,000
people living within three miles.
Lastly, our balance sheet is one of the strongest in the shopping center sector. During 2017, we raised
approximately $500 million in equity at $26 per share and closed $1.0 billion of non-recourse mortgages
at a blended 4% interest rate with a weighted average term-to-maturity of ten years. As of December 31,
2017, our net debt to total market capitalization ratio was only 22% and our net debt to adjusted EBITDA
was 4.6x. We have approximately $500 million of cash, $1.4 billion of unencumbered properties, no
corporate debt, no crossed mortgages and no debt maturing until 2021. We are well positioned to fund our
redevelopment and acquisition initiatives.
We are pleased with our report card since we spun from Vornado three years ago.
Stock performance incl. dividends
Urban Edge
Bloomberg Shopping Center Index
Outperformance
FFO as Adjusted per share
FFO as Adjusted growth
Same property cash NOI growth
Same property occupancy rate
2015
2016
2017
2%
-3%
500bp
$1.21
n/a
4.1%
97.2%
21%
-4%
2,500bp
$1.27
5.0%
4.1%
98.0%
-4%
-11%
700bp
$1.34
5.5%
4.7%
98.3%
Return
since spin
19%
-12%
3,100bp
Two areas of focus in 2018 are retailer bankruptcies and Puerto Rico.
Retailer bankruptcies will continue to impact the sector. Our top tenants, however, are generally winners
in the evolving retail environment. We view bankruptcies as an opportunity to upgrade our properties as
highlighted by Toys R Us. We have nine spaces leased to Toys representing $6 million in revenue or $.05
per share. We look forward to replacing Toys with more popular and successful tenants, many of which
are already pursuing these spaces.
Our two assets in Puerto Rico are performing well since re-opening just eight weeks after Hurricane
Maria. Even in a deeply-troubled economy, our properties are 93% leased and generating double-digit
sales increases over last year. Maintaining occupancy and improving merchandising are important
objectives for 2018. Non-recourse mortgages limit our economic exposure.
Our success is tied to the leaders who execute our strategy. We are fortunate to have an experienced team
led by Bob Minutoli, Mark Langer, Michael Zucker, Herb Eilberg, Bernie Schachter, Rob Milton and
Jennifer Holmes. I am proud of the culture that we have developed where communication, transparency
and integrity are valued throughout our organization.
I wish to extend my thanks to our Trustees who bring broad and deep experience and constantly challenge
the status quo.
We appreciate your support and look forward to many successful years ahead.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey S. Olson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2018
NON- GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
The Company uses certain non-GAAP performance measures, in addition to the primary GAAP presentations, as we
believe these measures improve the understanding of the Company's operational results. We continually evaluate the usefulness,
relevance, limitations, and calculation of our reported non-GAAP performance measures to determine how best to provide relevant
information to the investing public, and thus such reported measures are subject to change. The Company's non-GAAP performance
measures have limitations as they do not include all items of income and expense that affect operations, and accordingly, should
always be considered as supplemental financial results. FFO, FFO as Adjusted, cash NOI and same-property cash NOI are non-
GAAP measures commonly used by the Company and investing public to understand and evaluate our operating results and
performance. The Company believes net income is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to FFO, FFO as Adjusted,
cash NOI and same-property cash NOI. Reconciliations of these measures to net income have been provided in the tables below.
Reconciliation of Net Income to FFO and FFO as Adjusted
The following table reflects the reconciliation of net income to FFO and FFO as Adjusted for the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. Net income is considered the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
Net (loss) income
$
72,938
$
0.62
$
96,630
$
0.91
$
41,348
$
0.39
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
Year Ended
December 31, 2015
(in thousands)
(per share) (2)
(in thousands)
(per share) (2)
(in thousands)
(per share) (2)
Less (net income) attributable to
noncontrolling interests in:
Operating partnership
Consolidated subsidiaries
Net (loss) income attributable to common
shareholders
Adjustments:
Rental property depreciation and
amortization
Gain on sale of real estate
Real estate impairment loss
Limited partnership interests in operating
partnership
FFO applicable to diluted common
shareholders(1)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Casualty loss
Construction settlement due to tenant
Transaction costs
One-time equity awards related to the
spin-off
Environmental remediation costs
Debt restructuring expenses
Severance costs
Gain on sale of land
Benefit related to income taxes
Tenant bankruptcy settlement income
Real estate tax settlement income related
to prior periods
Income tax benefit from hurricane losses
Income from acquired leasehold interest
FFO as Adjusted applicable to diluted
common shareholders(1)
Weighted average diluted common shares -
FFO(1)
(5,824)
(44)
67,070
81,401
—
3,467
5,824
157,762
35,336
6,092
902
278
—
—
—
—
(202)
—
(655)
—
(1,767)
(39,215)
(0.05)
—
0.57
0.68
—
0.03
0.05
1.33
0.30
0.05
0.01
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(0.01)
—
(0.01)
(0.33)
(5,812)
(3)
90,815
55,484
(15,618)
—
5,812
136,493
—
—
—
1,405
—
—
—
—
—
(625)
(2,378)
—
—
—
(0.05)
—
0.86
0.53
(0.15)
—
0.05
1.29
—
—
—
0.01
—
—
—
—
—
(0.01)
(0.02)
—
—
—
(2,547)
(16)
38,785
56,619
—
—
2,547
97,951
—
—
—
24,011
7,143
1,379
1,034
693
—
—
(3,738)
(532)
—
—
(0.02)
—
0.37
0.54
—
—
0.02
0.93
—
—
—
0.23
0.07
0.01
0.01
—
—
—
(0.04)
—
—
—
$
158,531
$
1.34
$
134,895
$
1.27
$
127,941
$
1.21
118,392
106,099
105,375
_________________
(1) OP and LTIP Units are excluded from the calculation of earnings per diluted share for the quarter because their inclusion is anti-dilutive and are included for
the year because their inclusion is dilutive. FFO per share includes units as these units are dilutive.
(2) Individual items may not add up due to total rounding.
Reconciliation of Net Income to Cash NOI and Same-Property Cash NOI
The following table reflects the reconciliation of cash NOI, same-property cash NOI (with and without redevelopment)
to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
(Amounts in thousands)
Net (loss) income
Add: income tax (benefit) expense
Interest income
Gain on sale of real estate
Interest and debt expense
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Management and development fee income from non-owned properties
Other income
Depreciation and amortization
Casualty and impairment loss
General and administrative expense
Transaction costs
Less: non-cash revenue and expenses
Cash NOI
Adjustments
Non-same property cash NOI
Hurricane relates operating loss
Construction settlement due to tenant
Tenant bankruptcy settlement income
Same-property cash NOI
Adjustments:
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2017
2016
$
72,938
(278)
(2,248)
(202)
56,218
35,336
(1,535)
(235)
82,281
7,382
30,413
278
(47,161)
233,187
(46,766)
1,267
902
(975)
187,615
$
96,630
804
(679)
(15,618)
51,881
—
(1,759)
(121)
56,145
—
27,438
1,405
(6,465)
209,661
(28,164)
—
—
(2,378)
179,119
Cash NOI related to properties being redeveloped
Same-property cash NOI including properties in redevelopment
25,304
22,846
$
212,919
$
201,965
__________________
(1) Cash NOI is calculated as total property revenues less property operating expenses, excluding the net effects of non-cash rental income and non-cash ground
rent expense.
(2) Other adjustments include revenue and expense items attributable to non-same properties and corporate activities.
(3) Tenant bankruptcy settlement income includes lease termination income.
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
The following table reflects the reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter and
year ended December 31, 2017. Net income (loss) is considered the most directly comparable GAAP measure, for the year ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016.
(Amounts in thousands)
Net (loss) income
Depreciation and amortization
Interest and debt expense
Income tax (benefit) expense
EBITDA
Adjustments for Adjusted EBITDA:
Casualty loss
Construction settlement due to tenant
Real estate impairment loss
Transaction costs
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Tenant bankruptcy settlement income
Gain on sale of real estate
Income from acquired leasehold interest
Adjusted EBITDA
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2017
2016
$
72,938
$
82,281
56,218
(278)
211,159
6,092
902
3,467
278
35,336
(655)
(202)
(39,215)
217,162
$
96,630
46,145
51,881
804
205,460
—
—
—
1,405
—
(2,378)
(15,618)
—
188,869
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the annual period ended December 31, 2017
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________to__________
Commission File Number: 001-36523 (Urban Edge Properties)
Commission File Number: 333-212951-01 (Urban Edge Properties LP)
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland (Urban Edge Properties)
Delaware (Urban Edge Properties LP)
47-6311266
36-4791544
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
888 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
10019
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number including area code:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Urban Edge Properties
Title of Each Class
Common Shares, $.01 par value per share
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
New York Stock Exchange
Urban Edge Properties LP
Title of Each Class
None
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
N/A
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Urban Edge Properties: None
Urban Edge Properties LP: None
_______________________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Urban Edge Properties
YES
NO
Urban Edge Properties LP YES
NO
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Urban Edge Properties
YES
NO
Urban Edge Properties LP YES
NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Urban Edge Properties
YES
NO
Urban Edge Properties LP YES
NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data
File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Urban Edge Properties
YES
NO
Urban Edge Properties LP YES
NO
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Urban Edge Properties
Urban Edge Properties LP
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company,
or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging
growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Urban Edge Properties:
Large Accelerated Filer
Accelerated Filer
Non-Accelerated Filer
Smaller Reporting Company
Emerging Growth Company
Urban Edge Properties LP:
Large Accelerated Filer
Accelerated Filer
Non-Accelerated Filer
Smaller Reporting Company
Emerging Growth Company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with
any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Urban Edge Properties
Urban Edge Properties LP
Urban Edge Properties
YES
NO
Urban Edge Properties LP YES
NO
As of June 30, 2017, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the
Common Shares held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant was approximately $2.5 billion based upon the last reported sale price of $23.73 per
share on the New York Stock Exchange on such date.
As of January 31, 2018, Urban Edge Properties had 113,824,653 common shares outstanding. There is no public trading market for the common
units of Urban Edge Properties LP. As a result, the aggregate market value of the common units held by non-affiliates of Urban Edge Properties
LP cannot be determined.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III incorporates by reference information from certain portions of the Urban Edge Properties’ definite proxy statement for the 2018 annual
meeting of shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 of Urban Edge Properties and Urban
Edge Properties LP. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to “UE” and “Urban Edge” mean Urban
Edge Properties, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”), and references to “UELP” and the “Operating Partnership”
mean Urban Edge Properties LP, a Delaware limited partnership. References to the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” mean
collectively UE, UELP and those entities/subsidiaries consolidated by UE.
UELP is the entity through which we conduct substantially all of our business and own, either directly or through subsidiaries,
substantially all of our assets. UE is the sole general partner and also a limited partner of UELP. As the sole general partner of
UELP, UE has exclusive control of UELP’s day-to-day management.
As of December 31, 2017, UE owned an approximate 89.9% ownership interest in UELP. The remaining approximate 10.1%
interest is owned by limited partners. The other limited partners of UELP are Vornado Realty L.P., members of management, our
Board of Trustees, and contributors of property interests acquired. Under the limited partnership agreement of UELP, unitholders
may present their common units of UELP for redemption at any time (subject to restrictions agreed upon at the time of issuance
of the units that may restrict such right for a period of time). Upon presentation of a common unit for redemption, UELP must
redeem the unit for cash equal to the then value of a share of UE’s common shares, as defined by the limited partnership agreement.
In lieu of cash redemption by UELP, however, UE may elect to acquire any common units so tendered by issuing common shares
of UE in exchange for the common units. If UE so elects, its common shares will be exchanged for common units on a one-for-
one basis. This one-for-one exchange ratio is subject to specified adjustments to prevent dilution. UE generally expects that it will
elect to issue its common shares in connection with each such presentation for redemption rather than having UELP pay cash.
With each such exchange or redemption, UE’s percentage ownership in UELP will increase. In addition, whenever UE issues
common shares other than to acquire common units of UELP, UE must contribute any net proceeds it receives to UELP and UELP
must issue to UE an equivalent number of common units of UELP. This structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership
REIT, or UPREIT.
The Company believes that combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of UE and UELP into this single report provides the
following benefits:
•
•
•
enhances investors’ understanding of UE and UELP by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same
manner as management views and operates the business;
eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation because a substantial portion
of the disclosure applies to both UE and UELP; and
creates time and cost efficiencies throughout the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.
The Company believes it is important to understand the few differences between UE and UELP in the context of how UE and
UELP operate as a consolidated company. The financial results of UELP are consolidated into the financial statements of UE. UE
does not have any other significant assets, liabilities or operations, other than its investment in UELP, nor does it have employees
of its own. UELP, not UE, generally executes all significant business relationships other than transactions involving the securities
of UE. UELP holds substantially all of the assets of UE. UELP conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a
partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for the net proceeds from equity offerings by UE, which are contributed to the
capital of UELP in exchange for units of limited partnership in UELP, as applicable, UELP generates all remaining capital required
by the Company’s business. These sources may include working capital, net cash provided by operating activities, borrowings
under the revolving credit agreement, the issuance of secured and unsecured debt and equity securities and proceeds received from
the disposition of certain properties.
Shareholders’ equity, partners’ capital and noncontrolling interests are the main areas of difference between the consolidated
financial statements of UE and UELP. The limited partners of UELP are accounted for as partners’ capital in UELP’s financial
statements and as noncontrolling interests in UE’s financial statements. The noncontrolling interests in UELP’s financial statements
include the interests of unaffiliated partners in consolidated entities. The noncontrolling interests in UE’s financial statements
include the same noncontrolling interests at UELP’s level and limited partners of UELP. The differences between shareholders’
equity and partners’ capital result from differences in the equity issued at UE and UELP levels.
To help investors better understand the key differences between UE and UELP, certain information for UE and UELP in this report
has been separated, as set forth below: Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements which includes specific disclosures for UE and UELP,
and Note 15, Equity and Noncontrolling Interests, Note 17, Earnings Per Share and Unit and Note 18 thereto, Quarterly Financial
Data.
This report also includes separate Part II, Item 9A. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Exhibits 31 and 32 certifications
for each of UE and UELP in order to establish that the requisite certifications have been made and that UE and UELP are compliant
with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES AND URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 1.
Business
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
PART I
PART II
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.
Item 9.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.
Other Information
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Item 15.
Item 16.
PART III
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Form 10-K Summary
Signatures
1
4
17
18
22
22
23
26
29
46
47
83
83
88
88
88
88
89
89
89
89
92
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
The Company
Urban Edge Properties (“UE”, “Urban Edge” or the “Company”) (NYSE: UE) is a Maryland real estate investment trust that
manages, develops, redevelops, and acquires retail real estate, primarily in the New York metropolitan area. Urban Edge Properties
LP (“UELP” or the “Operating Partnership”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed to serve as UE’s majority-owned partnership
subsidiary and to own, through affiliates, all of our real estate and other assets. UE and UELP were created in 2014 to own the
majority of Vornado Realty Trust’s (“Vornado”) (NYSE: VNO) former shopping center business (the “UE Business”), and separated
from Vornado in January 2015. Our portfolio currently comprises 85 shopping centers, four malls and a warehouse park totaling
approximately 16.7 million square feet with a consolidated occupancy rate of 96.3%.
Unless the context otherwise requires, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to UE after giving effect to the transfer of the UE Business from
Vornado, and for periods prior to such transfer, refer to the UE Business while owned by Vornado.
The Company reviews operating and financial information for each property on an individual basis. Segment information is
prepared on the same basis, and therefore, each property represents an individual operating segment. We aggregate all of our
properties into one reportable segment due to their similarities with regard to the economics of the properties, tenants and operational
processes.
The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
“Code”), commencing with the filing of its 2015 tax return for its tax year ended December 31, 2015. Under those sections, a
REIT which distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income as a dividend to its shareholders each year and which meets certain
other conditions will not be taxed on that portion of its taxable income which is distributed to its shareholders. If we fail to qualify
as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any alternative
minimum tax, which, for corporations, was repealed under the TCJA (defined below) for tax years beginning after December 31,
2017) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years. Our two Puerto Rico malls are subject to a
29% non-resident withholding tax which is included in income tax expense in the consolidated and combined statements of income.
Company Strategies
Our goal is to be a leading owner of retail real estate in and on the edges of major urban markets, principally in the New York
metropolitan area. We believe urban markets offer attractive investment opportunities resulting from a unique interplay of
demographic, supply/demand and redevelopment/development trends. To achieve this goal, our primary strategies include:
Maximizing the value of existing properties through proactive management. We intend to maximize the value of each of our assets
through comprehensive, proactive management encompassing: continuous asset evaluation for highest-and-best-use; efficient and
cost-conscious day-to-day operations that minimize retailer operating expense and enhance property quality; and targeted leasing
to the most desirable tenants. Leasing is a critical value-creation function that includes:
• Monitoring retailer sales, merchandising, store operations, timeliness of payments, overall financial condition and
related factors;
• Being constantly aware of each asset’s competitive position and making physical improvements or adjusting
merchandising if circumstances warrant;
• Continuously canvassing trade areas to identify unique operators that can distinguish a property and enhance its
offerings;
• Maintaining regular contact with the brokerage community to stay abreast of new merchants, potential relocations,
new supply and overall trade area dynamics;
• Conducting regular portfolio reviews with key merchants;
• Building and nurturing broad and deep relationships with retailer decision-makers;
•
Focusing on spaces with below-market leases that might be recaptured;
• Understanding the impact of options, exclusives, co-tenancy and other restrictive lease provisions; and
• Optimizing required capital investment in every transaction.
1
Actively investing. We intend to redevelop existing properties and to acquire properties in target markets. Each investment must
meet our criteria for risk-adjusted return and for overall quality compared to our existing portfolio.
Investment considerations include:
• Geography: We focus primarily on the New York metropolitan area and secondarily on the Washington, DC to Boston
corridor.
• Product: We generally seek retail properties that offer local communities necessity and convenience-oriented retailers.
We also seek large shopping centers, preferably with a supermarket, where demographics and supply constraints provide
attractive financial dynamics.
•
Tenancy: We consider tenant mix, sales performance and related occupancy cost, lease term, lease provisions, omni-
channel capabilities, susceptibility to e-commerce disruption and other factors. Our tenant base comprises a diverse group
of merchants including department stores, supermarkets, discounters, entertainment offerings, health clubs, DIY stores,
in-line specialty shops, restaurants and other food and beverage vendors and service providers. We believe that this
diversification provides stability to our cash flows as no specific retail category constitutes more than 20% of our portfolio’s
annual base rental revenue and no one retailer contributed more than 6% of our annual base rental revenue in 2017.
• Rent: We consider existing rents relative to market rents and target submarkets that have potential for market rent growth
as evidenced by strong retailer performance.
• Competition and Barriers-to-Entry: We seek assets in underserved, high barrier-to-entry markets in densely populated,
affluent trade areas. We believe that properties located in such markets present more attractive risk-return profile relative
to other markets. We intend to invest in our existing core markets, and, over time, may expand into new markets that
have similar characteristics.
• Access and Visibility: We seek assets with convenient access and good visibility.
• Physical Condition: We consider aesthetics, functionality, building and site conditions and environmental matters in
evaluating asset quality.
Constantly evaluating our portfolio and, where appropriate, engaging in selective dispositions. We intend to regularly evaluate
each property and, where appropriate, dispose of those properties that do not meet our investment criteria. We intend to reinvest
the proceeds from any dispositions into redevelopment, development and acquisitions, or we may use such funds to reduce
outstanding debt.
Maintaining capital discipline. We intend to keep our balance sheet flexible and capable of supporting growth. We expect to
generate increasing levels of cash flow from internally generated funds and to have substantial borrowing capacity under our
existing revolving credit agreement and from potential secured debt financing on our existing assets.
Significant Tenants
None of our tenants accounted for more than 10% of total revenues in any of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
The Home Depot is our largest tenant and accounted for approximately $22.3 million, or 5.5% of our total revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2017.
Employees
Our headquarters are located at 888 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10019. As of December 31, 2017, we had 120 employees.
Available Information
Copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10 K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10 Q, Current Reports on Form 8 K, and amendments
to those reports, as well as Reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 regarding officers, trustees or 10% beneficial owners of us, filed or furnished
pursuant to Section 13(a), 15(d) or 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are available free of charge through our website
(www.uedge.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Also available on our website are copies of our Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee
Charter, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate
Governance Guidelines. In the event of any changes to these charters or the code or guidelines, changed copies will also be made
available on our website. Copies of these documents are also available directly from us free of charge. Our website also includes
other financial information, including certain non-GAAP financial measures, none of which is a part of this Annual Report on
2
Form 10-K. Copies of our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are also available free of charge from us, upon
request.
Supplement to Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
This summary supplements and updates the discussion contained under the caption “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences” in the prospectus dated August 5, 2016, contained in our Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC
on August 5, 2016, should be read in conjunction therewith and is subject to the qualifications set forth therein. This summary is
for general information purposes only and is not tax advice. This discussion does not address all aspects of taxation that may be
relevant to particular holders of our securities in light of their personal investment or tax circumstances.
Recent Legislation
The recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”), generally applicable for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017,
made significant changes to the Code, including a number of provisions of the Code that affect the taxation of businesses and their
owners, including REITs and their stockholders, and, in certain cases, that modify the tax rules discussed in the accompanying
prospectus.
Among other changes, the TCJA made the following changes:
•
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, (i) the U.S. federal income tax rates on
ordinary income of individuals, trusts and estates have been generally reduced and (ii) non-corporate taxpayers are
permitted to take a deduction for certain pass-through business income, including dividends received from REITs that
are not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income, subject to certain limitations.
• The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for corporations has been reduced from 35% to 21%, and corporate alternative
minimum tax has been eliminated for corporations, which would generally reduce the amount of U.S. federal income tax
payable by our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”) and by us to the extent we were subject to corporate U.S. federal
income tax (for example, if we distributed less than 100% of our taxable income or recognized built-in gains in assets
acquired from C corporations). In addition, the maximum withholding rate on distributions by us to non-U.S. stockholders
that are treated as attributable to gain from the sale or exchange of a U.S. real property interest is reduced from 35% to
21%.
• Certain new limitations on the deductibility of interest expense now apply, which limitations may affect the deductibility
of interest paid or accrued by us or our TRSs.
• Certain new limitations on net operating losses now apply, which limitations may affect net operating losses generated
by us or our TRSs.
• A U.S. tax-exempt stockholder that is subject to tax on its unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”) will be required
to separately compute its taxable income and loss for each unrelated trade or business activity for purposes of determining
its UBTI.
• New accounting rules generally require us to recognize income items for federal income tax purposes no later than when
we take the item into account for financial statement purposes, which may accelerate our recognition of certain income
items.
This summary does not purport to be a detailed discussion of the changes to U.S. federal income tax laws as a result of the enactment
of the TCJA. Technical corrections or other amendments to the TCJA or administrative guidance interpreting the TCJA may be
forthcoming at any time. We cannot predict the long-term effect of the TCJA or any future law changes on REITs or their
stockholders. Investors are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect of the TCJA based on their particular
circumstances.
3
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following risks and other material in this information statement in evaluating the Company and
our common shares. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and
financial condition. These risks have been separated into three groups: (1) Risks Related to Our Business and Operations and to
Our Status as a REIT, (2) Risks Related to Our Common Shares and (3) Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS AND TO OUR STATUS AS A REIT
Factors that may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition are summarized below.
The risks and uncertainties described herein may not be the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently
known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial, may also adversely affect our business. See “Forward-Looking
Statements” contained herein.
There are inherent risks associated with real estate investments and the real estate industry, particularly retail real estate, each
of which could have an adverse impact on our financial performance and the value of our properties.
Real estate investments are subject to various risks, many of which are beyond our control. Our operating and financial performance
and the value of our properties can be affected by many of these risks, including, but not limited to, the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the convenience and quality of competing retail properties and other retailing platforms such as e-commerce;
local real estate conditions, such as an oversupply of retail space or a reduction in demand for retail space, resulting in
vacancies or compromising our ability to rent space on favorable terms;
adverse changes in the financial condition of tenants at our properties, including financial difficulties, lease defaults or
bankruptcies;
national, regional and local economies, which may be negatively impacted by inflation, deflation, government deficits,
high unemployment rates, severe weather or other natural disasters, decreased consumer confidence, industry slowdowns,
reduced corporate profits, lack of liquidity and other adverse business conditions;
civil unrest, acts of war, terrorist attacks and natural or man-made disasters, including seismic activity and floods, which
may result in uninsured and underinsured losses;
changes in the enforcement of laws, regulations and governmental policies, including, without limitation, health, safety,
environmental, zoning and tax laws, government fiscal policies and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”);
the illiquid nature of real estate investments, which may limit our ability to sell properties at the terms desired or at terms
favorable to us;
competition for investment opportunities from other real estate investors with significant capital, including other REITs,
real estate operating companies and institutional investment funds; and
fluctuations in interest rates and the availability and cost of financing, which could adversely affect our ability and the
ability of potential buyers and tenants of our properties, to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all.
During a period of economic slowdown or recession, or the public perception that such a period may occur, declining demand for
real estate could result in a general decline in rents or an increased incidence of defaults among our existing tenants, and,
consequently, our properties may fail to generate revenues sufficient to meet operating, debt service and other expenses. As a
result, we may have to borrow funds to cover fixed costs, and our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could
be adversely affected. As such, the market price of our common shares, and our ability to service debt obligations and pay dividends
and other distributions to security holders could be adversely affected.
E-commerce may have an adverse impact on our tenants and our business.
E-commerce continues to gain in popularity and growth in internet sales is likely to continue in the future. E-commerce could
result in a downturn in the business of some of our current tenants and could affect the way other current and future tenants lease
space. For example, the migration towards e-commerce has led many omnichannel retailers to prune the number and size of their
traditional “brick and mortar” locations to increasingly rely on e-commerce and alternative distribution channels. Many tenants
also permit merchandise purchased on their websites to be picked up at, or returned to, their physical store locations, which may
have the effect of decreasing the reported amount of their in-store sales and the amount of rent we are able to collect from them
(particularly with respect to those tenants who pay rent based on a percentage of their in-store sales). We cannot predict with
certainty how growth in e-commerce will impact the demand for space at our properties or how much revenue will be generated
at traditional store locations in the future. If the shift towards e-commerce causes declines in the “brick and mortar” sales generated
4
by our tenants and/or causes our tenants to reduce the size or number of their retail locations in the future, our cash flow, financial
condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Retail real estate is a competitive business.
Competition in the retail real estate industry is intense. We compete with a large number of public and private retail real estate
companies, including property owners and developers. We compete with these companies to attract customers to our properties,
as well as to attract anchor, non-anchor and other tenants. We also compete with these companies for development, redevelopment
and acquisition opportunities. Other owners and developers may attempt to take existing tenants from our shopping centers by
offering lower rents or other incentives to compel them to relocate. This competition could have a material adverse effect on our
ability to lease space and on the amount of rent and expense reimbursements that we receive.
We depend on leasing space to tenants on economically favorable terms and on collecting rent from tenants who ultimately
may not be able to pay.
Our financial results depend significantly on leasing space in our properties to tenants on economically favorable terms. A majority
of our income depends on the ability of our tenants to pay the full amount of rent and other charges due under their leases on a
timely basis. Some of our leases provide for the payment, in addition to base rent, of additional rent above the base amount
according to a specified percentage of the gross sales generated by the tenants and generally provide for reimbursement of real
estate taxes and expenses of operating the property. Economic and/or competitive conditions may impact the success of our tenants’
retail operations and therefore the amount of rent and expense reimbursements we receive from our tenants. While demand for
our retail spaces has been strong, there can be no assurance in our ability to maintain our occupancy levels on favorable terms.
Any reduction in our tenants’ abilities to pay base rent, percentage rent or other charges on a timely basis will decrease our income,
funds available to pay indebtedness and funds available for distribution to shareholders. If a tenant does not pay its rent, we might
not be able to enforce our rights as landlord without delays and might incur substantial legal and other costs. During periods of
economic adversity, there may be an increase in the number of tenants that cannot pay their rent and an increase in vacancy rates,
which could materially and adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be unable to renew leases or relet space as leases expire.
When our tenants decide not to renew their leases upon their expiration, we may not be able to relet the space. Properties that
accounted for approximately 5.1% of our annualized base rent for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 were vacant as of
December 31, 2017, excluding leases signed but not commenced. In addition, leases accounting for approximately 16% of our
annualized base rent for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 are scheduled to expire within the next three years. Even if
tenants do renew or we can relet the space, the terms of the renewal or reletting, taking into account among other things, the cost
of improvements to the property and leasing commissions, may be less favorable than the terms in the expired leases. In addition,
changes in space utilization by our tenants may impact our ability to renew or relet space without the need to incur substantial
costs in renovating or redesigning the internal configuration of the relevant property. If we are unable to promptly renew the leases
or relet the space at similar rates or if we incur substantial costs in renewing or reletting the space, our cash flow and ability to
service debt obligations and pay dividends and other distributions to security holders could be adversely affected.
Bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants may decrease our revenues, net income and available cash.
From time to time, some of our tenants have declared bankruptcy and other tenants may declare bankruptcy or become insolvent
in the future. For example, in September 2017, Toys “R” Us, Inc. (“Toys “R” Us”), filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of
the United States Bankruptcy Code. As of December 31, 2017, we had leases with Toys “R” Us at nine locations with annualized
base rent of $5.0 million. Additionally, Sears Holding Corporation and Staples, Inc. represent 2.0% and 1.5%, respectively, of our
annualized base rent and each continued to close stores in 2017. Tenants who file bankruptcy have the legal right to reject any or
all of their leases and close related stores. In the event that a tenant with a significant number of leases in our properties files
bankruptcy and rejects its leases, we could experience a significant reduction in our revenues and we may not be able to collect
all pre-petition amounts owed by that party, which may adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.
The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant at one of our properties could also negatively impact our ability to lease other
existing or future vacancies in the property. In addition, our leases generally do not contain restrictions designed to ensure the
ongoing creditworthiness of our tenants. The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant could result in a lower level of net income,
which may adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations and decrease funds available to pay our
indebtedness or make distributions to shareholders. See Part I, Item 2. “Properties” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
5
A significant number of our properties are located in the New York metropolitan area and are affected by the economic cycles
there.
Because a significant number of our properties are located in the New York metropolitan area, we are particularly susceptible to
adverse economic and other developments in that area. Notably, as of December 31, 2017, two of our New York metropolitan area
properties in the aggregate generated in excess of 15% of our annualized base rent (The Outlets at Bergen Town Center and Tonnelle
Commons in New Jersey). Collectively, our New York metropolitan area properties in the aggregate generated in excess of 70%
of our annualized base rent as of December 31, 2017. Real estate markets are subject to economic downturns and we cannot predict
the economic conditions in the New York metropolitan area in either the short-term or long-term. Poor economic or market
conditions in the New York metropolitan area, may adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks related to Puerto Rico.
Our two malls in Puerto Rico make up approximately 10% of our Net Operating Income. Puerto Rico faces significant fiscal and
economic challenges, including its government filing for bankruptcy protection in 2017. In addition, Hurricanes Irma and Maria
placed significant, lasting stress on the island’s already strained economy and infrastructure. These factors have led to an ongoing
emigration trend of Puerto Rico residents to the United States and elsewhere. The combination of these circumstances could result
in less disposable income for the purchase of goods sold in our centers and the inability of merchants to pay rent and other charges.
Any of these events could negatively impact our ability to lease space on terms and conditions we seek and could have a material
adverse effect on our business and results of operations. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has individual, non-resource
mortgages on each of its Puerto Rico properties as follows: a $116.2 million mortgage, comprised of a senior and junior loan,
maturing in July 2021 secured by Montehiedra Town Center and a $130.0 million mortgage maturing in August 2024 secured by
the Las Catalinas Mall.
Natural disasters could have a concentrated impact on us.
We own properties near the Atlantic Coast and in Puerto Rico which are subject to natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods and
storm surges. We also have four properties in California that could be impacted by earthquakes. As a result, we could become
subject to business interruption, significant losses and repair costs, such as those we experienced from Hurricane Maria, which
damaged and caused the temporary closure of our two properties in Puerto Rico. The Company maintains comprehensive, all-risk
property and rental value insurance coverage on our properties, however losses resulting from a natural disaster may be subject
to a deductible or not fully covered and such losses could adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.
Some of our properties depend on anchor or major tenants and decisions made by these tenants, or adverse developments in
the businesses of these tenants, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Some of our properties have anchor or major tenants that generally occupy larger spaces, sometimes pay a significant portion of
a property’s total rent and often contribute to the success of other tenants by drawing customers to a property. If an anchor or major
tenant closes, such closure could adversely affect the property even if the tenant continues to pay rent due to the loss of the anchor
or major tenant’s drawing power. Additionally, closure of an anchor or major tenant could result in lease terminations by, or
reductions in rent from, other tenants if the other tenants’ leases have co-tenancy clauses that permit cancellation or rent reduction
if an anchor tenant closes. Retailer consolidation, store rationalization, competition from internet sales and general economic
conditions may decrease the number of potential tenants available to fill available anchor tenant spaces. As a result, in the event
one or more anchor tenants were to leave one or more of our centers, we cannot be sure that we would be able to lease the vacant
space on equivalent terms or at all. In addition, we may not be able to recover costs owed to us by the closed tenant. In certain
cases, some anchor and non-anchor tenants may be able to terminate their leases if they do not achieve defined sales levels.
Development, redevelopment, and acquisition activities have inherent risks, which could adversely impact our cash flow,
financial condition and results of operations.
We may develop, redevelop or acquire properties when we believe that a development, redevelopment or acquisition project is
consistent with our business strategy. As of December 31, 2017, we had 14 properties in our redevelopment project pipeline and
15 active redevelopment projects. We have invested a total of approximately $90.6 million in our active projects, which are at
various stages of completion, and based on our current plans and estimates, we anticipate it will cost an additional $104.9 million
to complete our active projects. Our 14 total pipeline projects are estimated to cost $108 - 123 million. We anticipate engaging in
additional redevelopment and development activities in the future. In addition to the risks associated with real estate investments
in general as described elsewhere, the risks associated with future development, and redevelopment activities include:
•
•
•
expenditure of capital and time on projects that may never be completed;
failure or inability to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all;
inability to secure necessary zoning or regulatory approvals;
6
•
•
•
•
•
•
higher than estimated construction or operating costs, including labor and material costs;
inability to complete construction on schedule due to a number of factors, including inclement weather, labor disruptions,
construction delays, delays or failure to receive zoning or other regulatory approvals, acts of terror or other acts of violence,
or natural disasters (such as fires, seismic activity or floods);
significant time lag between commencement and stabilization resulting in delayed returns and greater risks due to
fluctuations in the general economy, shifts in demographics and competition;
decrease in customer traffic during the redevelopment period causing a decrease in tenant sales;
inability to secure key anchor or other tenants at anticipated pace of lease-up or at all; and
occupancy and rental rates at a newly completed project that may not meet expectations.
If any of the above events were to occur, the development, redevelopment or acquisition of the properties may hinder our growth
and may have an adverse effect on our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. If we choose to pursue acquisitions
in new markets or acquire assets that contain non-retail uses where we do not have the same level of market knowledge, it may
result in weaker than anticipated performance. In addition, new development and significant redevelopment or acquisition activities,
regardless of whether they are ultimately successful, typically require substantial time and attention from management.
We may be unable to complete acquisitions and even if acquisitions are completed, our operating results at acquired properties
may not meet our financial expectations.
We continue to evaluate the market of available properties and expect to continue to acquire properties when we believe strategic
opportunities exist. Our ability to acquire properties on favorable terms and successfully operate or develop them is subject to the
following risks:
• we may be unable to acquire a desired property because of competition from other real estate investors with substantial
capital, including other REITs, real estate operating companies and institutional investment funds;
•
even if we are able to acquire a desired property, competition from other potential acquirers may significantly increase
the purchase price;
• we may incur significant costs and divert management attention in connection with the evaluation and negotiation of
potential acquisitions, including ones that are subsequently not completed;
• we may be unable to finance acquisitions on favorable terms and in the time period we desire, or at all;
• we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly the acquisition of portfolios of
properties, into our existing operations;
• we may acquire properties that are not initially accretive to our results upon acquisition, and we may not successfully
manage and lease those properties to meet our expectations; and
• we may acquire properties subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse to former owners,
with respect to unknown liabilities for clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination, claims by tenants or other
persons to former owners of the properties and claims for indemnification by general partners, trustees, officers and others
indemnified by the former owners of the properties.
If we are unable to acquire properties on favorable terms, obtain financing in a timely manner and on favorable terms, or operate
acquired properties to meet our financial expectations, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
It may be difficult to dispose of real estate quickly, which may limit our flexibility.
Real estate investments are relatively difficult to dispose of quickly. Consequently, we may have limited ability to promptly change
our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. Moreover, our ability to dispose of, or finance real estate
assets may be materially and adversely affected during periods of uncertainty or unfavorable conditions in the credit markets as
we or potential buyers of our assets may experience difficulty in obtaining financing. To dispose of low basis deferral or tax-
protected properties efficiently we from time to time use like-kind exchanges, which are intended to qualify for non-recognition
of taxable gain, but can be difficult to consummate and result in the property for which the disposed assets are exchanged inheriting
their low tax bases and other tax attributes (including tax protection covenants). These challenges related to dispositions may limit
our flexibility.
7
Many real estate costs are fixed, even if income from our properties decreases.
Our financial results depend primarily on leasing space in our properties to tenants on terms favorable to us. Costs associated with
real estate investment, such as real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, generally are not reduced even when a property
is not fully occupied, rental rates decrease, or other circumstances cause a reduction in income from the property. As a result, cash
flow from the operations of our properties may be reduced if a tenant does not pay its rent or we are unable to rent our properties
on favorable terms.
A number of properties in our portfolio are subject to ground or building leases; if we are found to be in breach of a ground
or building lease or are unable to renew a ground or building lease, we could be materially and adversely affected.
A number of the properties in our portfolio are either completely or partially on land that is owned by third parties and leased to
us pursuant to ground or building leases. Accordingly, we only own a long-term leasehold or similar interest in those properties.
If we are found to be in breach of a ground or building lease and that breach cannot be cured, we could lose our interest in the
improvements and the right to operate the property. In addition, unless we can purchase a fee interest in the underlying land or
building or extend the terms of these leases before or at their expiration, as to which no assurance can be given, we will lose our
interest in the improvements and the right to operate these properties. However, in certain cases, our ability to exercise such options
is subject to the condition that we are not in default under the terms of the ground or building lease at the time that we exercise
such options, and we can provide no assurances that we will be able to exercise our options at such time. If we were to lose the
right to operate a property due to a breach or non-renewal of the ground or building lease, we would be unable to derive income
from such property, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Loss of our key personnel could adversely affect the value of our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are dependent on the efforts of our key executive personnel. Although we believe qualified replacements could be found for
these key executives in the event of a departure, the loss of one or more of their services could materially and adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures.
Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures and the existence of a disaster recovery plan for our
information technology infrastructure, our systems are vulnerable to damages from any number of sources, including computer
viruses, unauthorized access, energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication failures. In addition, in
August 2017 we implemented a new information technology platform, including a new enterprise resources planning (“ERP”)
system. We have placed reliance on third party managed services to perform a number of these functions. We may experience
system difficulties and implementation issues as we transition to our new platform and integrate the services provided by third
parties. If we experience a system failure or accident that causes interruptions in our operations or if we are unable to effectively
implement the ERP system, we could experience material and adverse disruptions to our business. We may also incur additional
costs to remedy damages caused by such disruptions.
The occurrence of cyber incidents or a deficiency in our cybersecurity could cause a disruption to our operations, a compromise
or corruption of our confidential information and/or damage to our business relationships.
A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of our information
resources. More specifically, a cyber incident is an intentional attack or an unintentional event that can include gaining unauthorized
access to systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data, or steal confidential information. As our reliance on information technology
has increased, so have the risks posed to our systems, both internal and those we have outsourced. The primary risks that could
directly result from the occurrence of a cyber incident are operational interruption, damage to our relationship with our tenants
and third-party vendors and private data exposure. We have implemented processes, procedures and controls to help mitigate these
risks, however these efforts may not successfully prevent a cyber incident. We maintain coverage for cybersecurity insurance in
the event a cyber incident occurs. A cyber incident or other significant disruption involving our information technology could
significantly disrupt the proper functioning of our systems and, as a result, disrupt our operations, which could have a material
adverse effect on our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.
We may incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws and environmental contamination may impair our ability
to lease and/or sell real estate.
Our operations and properties are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the protection of the
environment including air and water quality, hazardous or toxic substances and health and safety. Under some environmental laws,
a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances
released at a property. The owner or operator may also be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property
damage or personal injuries and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by those parties because of the contamination. These
8
laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of the release of the substances or caused such
release. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination may impair our ability to sell or lease real estate
or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. Other laws and regulations govern indoor and outdoor air quality including those
that can require the abatement or removal of asbestos-containing materials in the event of damage, demolition, renovation or
remodeling and also govern emissions of and exposure to asbestos fibers in the air. The maintenance and removal of lead paint
and certain electrical equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are also regulated by federal and state laws. We are
also subject to risks associated with human exposure to chemical or biological contaminants such as molds, pollens, viruses and
bacteria which, above certain levels, can be alleged to be connected to allergic or other health effects and symptoms in susceptible
individuals. We could incur fines for environmental compliance and be held liable for the costs of remedial action with respect to
the foregoing regulated substances or related claims arising out of environmental contamination or human exposure at or from
our properties.
Most of our properties have been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment at various times. To date, these
environmental assessments have not revealed any environmental condition material and adverse to our business. However,
identification of new compliance concerns or undiscovered areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of
contamination, human exposure to contamination or changes in cleanup or compliance requirements could result in significant
costs to us.
Generally, our tenants must comply with environmental laws and meet remediation requirements. Our leases typically impose
obligations on our tenants to indemnify us from any compliance costs we may incur as a result of the environmental conditions
on the property caused by the tenant. If a lease does not require compliance or if a tenant fails to or cannot comply, we could be
forced to pay these costs. If not addressed, environmental conditions could impair our ability to sell or re-lease the affected
properties in the future or result in lower sales prices or rent payments, which could adversely impact our cash flow, financial
condition and results of operations.
Some of our potential losses may not be covered by insurance.
The Company maintains (i) general liability insurance with limits of $200 million for properties in the U.S. and Puerto Rico and
(ii) all-risk property insurance with limits of $500 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for properties in the U.S. and $139
million for properties in Puerto Rico, subject to the terms, conditions, exclusions, deductibles and sub-limits when applicable for
certain perils such as floods and earthquakes and (iii) numerous other insurance policies including trustees’ and officers’ insurance,
workers’ compensation and automobile-related liabilities insurance. The Company’s insurance includes coverage for certified acts
of terrorism acts but excludes coverage for nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological terrorism events as defined by the Terrorism
Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, which expires in December 2020. In addition, the Company maintains coverage for
certain cybersecurity losses with limits of $5 million per occurrence and in the aggregate providing first and third party coverage
including network interruption, event management, cyber extortion and claims for media content, security and privacy liability.
Insurance premiums are typically charged directly to each of the retail properties and warehouses but not all of the cost of such
premiums are recovered. The Company is responsible for deductibles, losses in excess of insurance coverage, and the portion of
premiums not covered from retail properties, which could be material.
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism. However, we
cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future and expect premiums across
most property coverage lines to increase in light of recent events. The incurrence of uninsured losses, costs or uncovered premiums
could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Certain of our loans and other agreements contain customary covenants requiring the maintenance of insurance coverage. Although
we believe that we currently have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain
an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. If lenders or other counterparties insist on greater coverage
than we are able to obtain, such requirement could materially and adversely affect our ability to finance our properties and expand
our portfolio.
Future terrorist acts and shooting incidents could harm the demand for, and the value of, our properties.
Over the past several years, a number of highly publicized terrorist acts and shootings have occurred at domestic and international
retail properties. In the event concerns regarding safety were to alter shopping habits or deter customers from visiting shopping
centers, our tenants would be adversely affected as would the general demand for retail space. Additionally, if such incidents were
to continue, insurance for such acts may become limited or subject to substantial cost increases. Such an incident at one of our
properties, particularly one in which we generate a significant amount of revenue, could materially and adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
9
Our assets may be subject to impairment charges.
Our long-lived assets, including real estate held for investment, are carried at net book value unless circumstances indicate that
the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Our properties are reviewed for impairment if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable. When assets are identified as held for
sale, we estimate the sales prices net of selling costs of such assets. If, in our opinion, the net sales prices of the assets which have
been identified for sale are expected to be less than the net book value of the assets, an impairment charge is recorded and we
write down the asset to fair value. An impairment charge may also be recorded for any asset if it is probable, in our estimation,
that the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property are less than the
carrying value of the property. Recording an impairment charge results in an immediate reduction in our income in the period in
which the charge is taken, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Compliance or failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, safety regulations or other requirements could result
in substantial costs.
The ADA generally requires that public buildings including our properties meet certain federal requirements related to access and
use by disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or the award of damages
to private litigants and/or legal fees to their counsel. We could be required under the ADA to make substantial alterations to, and
capital expenditures at, one or more of our properties, including the removal of access barriers, which could materially and adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements such as state and local fire and life safety
regulations. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could incur fines or private damage awards. We do not know whether
existing requirements will change or whether compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated
expenditures. If we incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA and any other legislation, our cash flow, financial condition
and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Changes in accounting principles, or interpretations thereof, could have a significant impact on our financial position and
results of operations.
We prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“GAAP”). These principles are subject to interpretation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
and various bodies formed to interpret and create appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles can have a
significant effect on our reported results and may even retroactively affect previously reported transactions. Additionally, the
adoption of new or revised accounting principles may require that we make significant changes to our systems, processes and
controls.
For example, in February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires all
operating leases with lease terms longer than twelve months be recorded as lease assets and lease liabilities on our consolidated
balance sheets. Implementing this ASU, as well as other new accounting guidance may require us to make significant upgrades
to and investments in our lease administration systems and other accounting systems, and could result in significant adverse
changes to our financial statements. For additional information regarding this and other updated standards, see the section titled
“Recently Issued Accounting Literature” in Note 3 to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements in Part II, Item
8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We face possible adverse changes in tax laws, which may result in an increase in our tax liability and adverse consequences
to our shareholders.
Changes in U.S. federal, state and local tax laws or regulations, with or without retroactive application, could have a negative
effect on us. New legislation, Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and
negatively affect our ability to qualify to be taxed as a REIT and/or the U.S. federal income tax consequences to our investors and
to the Company of such qualification. Even changes that do not impose greater taxes on us could potentially result in adverse
consequences to our shareholders. For example, the decrease in corporate tax rates under the recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act (the “TCJA”) could decrease the attractiveness of the REIT structure relative to companies that are not organized as REITs.
In any event, the rules of Section 355 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, which apply to determine
the taxability of the separation and the combination, have been the subject of change and may continue to be the subject of change,
possibly with retroactive application, which could have a negative effect on us and our shareholders. If such changes occur, we
may be required to pay additional taxes on our assets or income. These increased tax costs could materially and adversely affect
our business, results of operations and financial condition, and the amount of cash available for payment of dividends.
10
Prospective investors are urged to consult with their tax advisors regarding the effects of recently enacted tax legislation and
other legislative, regulatory and administrative developments.
The TCJA makes major changes to the Code, including a number of provisions of the Code that affect the taxation of REITs and
their stockholders. Among the changes made by the TCJA are permanently reducing the generally applicable corporate tax rate,
generally reducing the tax rate applicable to individuals and other non-corporate taxpayers for tax years beginning after December
31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, eliminating or modifying certain previously allowed deductions (including substantially
limiting interest deductibility and, for individuals, the deduction for non-business state and local taxes), and, for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, providing for preferential rates of taxation through a deduction
of up to 20% (subject to certain limitations) on most ordinary REIT dividends and certain trade or business income of non-corporate
taxpayers. The TCJA also imposes new limitations on the deduction of net operating losses, which may result in us having to make
additional taxable distributions to our stockholders in order to comply with REIT distribution requirements or avoid taxes on
retained income and gains. The effect of the significant changes made by the TCJA is highly uncertain, and administrative guidance
will be required in order to fully evaluate the effect of many provisions. The effect of any technical corrections with respect to the
TCJA could have an adverse effect on us or our stockholders. Investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the implications
of the TCJA on their investment in us.
Our existing tax protection agreements, and any tax protection agreements that we enter into in the future, could limit our
flexibility with respect to selling or otherwise disposing of properties contributed to UELP.
In connection with certain contributions of properties to UELP, we and UELP have entered into tax protection agreements with
the contributors of such properties that generally provide that if we dispose of any interest in the contributed properties in a taxable
transaction within a certain time period, subject to certain exceptions, we may be required to indemnify the contributors for their
tax liabilities attributable to the built-in gain that existed with respect to such property interests, and certain tax liabilities incurred
as a result of such tax protection payments. Therefore, although it may be in our stockholders’ best interests that we sell a contributed
property, it may be economically prohibitive for us to do so because of these obligations. In the future, we and UELP may enter
into additional tax protection agreements which could further limit our flexibility to sell or otherwise dispose of our properties.
Our capital recycling strategy entails various risks.
We intend to selectively explore opportunities to dispose of non-core properties and reinvest the sale proceeds in other parts of
our business, including in the acquisition of higher quality properties in our target markets and the development and redevelopment
of our properties, or to use the proceeds to pay down debt. While we hope to minimize the dilutive effect of these dispositions
through acquisitions, earnings from acquired properties may be less than the earnings from the disposed assets. Also, in the event
we are unable to sell these assets for amounts equal to or in excess of their current carrying values, we would be required to
recognize impairment charges. Any such impairment charges or earnings dilution could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the disposition of our assets may generate gains for tax purposes if not
deferred through a Section 1031 exchange, creating the obligation to make additional distributions to our shareholders.
We face significant competition for acquisitions of real properties, which may reduce the number of acquisition opportunities
available to us and increase the costs of these acquisitions.
The current market for acquisitions of properties in our core markets continues to be competitive. This competition may increase
the demand for the types of properties in which we typically invest and, therefore, increase the prices paid for such acquisition
properties. We also face significant competition for attractive acquisition opportunities from an indeterminate number of investors,
including publicly-traded and privately-held REITs, private equity investors and institutional investment funds, some of which
have greater financial resources, greater ability to borrow funds and the willingness to accept more risk than we can prudently
manage, including risks with respect to the geographic proximity of investments and the payment of higher acquisition prices.
This competition will increase if investments in real estate become more attractive relative to other forms of investment. Competition
for investments may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us and may have the effect of increasing
prices paid for such acquisition properties and, as a result, adversely affecting our ability to grow through acquisitions.
Covenants in our existing financing agreements may restrict our operating, financing, redevelopment, development, acquisition
and other activities.
The mortgages on our properties contain customary covenants such as those that limit our ability, without the prior consent of the
lender, to further mortgage the applicable property or to reduce insurance coverage. Our existing revolving credit facility contains,
and any debt that we may obtain in the future may contain, customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability
to incur indebtedness, including covenants (i) that limit our ability to incur debt based upon (1) our ratio of total debt to total assets,
(2) our ratio of secured debt to total assets, (3) our ratio of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)
to interest expense and (4) our ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges, and (ii) that require us to maintain a certain level of unencumbered
11
assets to unsecured debt. Our ability to borrow is subject to compliance with these and other covenants. Failure to comply with
our covenants could cause a default under the applicable debt instrument and we may then be required to repay such debt with
capital from other sources or to give possession of a secured property to the lender. Under those circumstances, other sources of
capital may not be available to us, or may be available only on unattractive terms.
We face risks related to our outstanding debt. The amount of debt and its cost may increase and refinancing or additional
financing may not be available at all or on acceptable terms.
If we are unable to obtain debt financing or refinance existing indebtedness upon maturity, our financial condition and results of
operations would likely be adversely affected. During the twelve months ending December 31, 2018, approximately $11.5 million
of our outstanding indebtedness will mature, which pertains to the mortgage loan secured by our property in Englewood, NJ.
During 2017, our property in Englewood, NJ was transferred to a receiver. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the property was
sold at a foreclosure sale. Upon issuance of the court’s order approving the sale and discharging the receiver, all assets and liabilities
related to the property will be removed. We have no other debt scheduled to mature until 2021. In addition, the cost of our existing
debt may increase, especially in the case of a rising interest rate environment, and we may not be able to refinance our existing
debt in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms. If the cost or amount of our indebtedness increases or we cannot refinance our
debt in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms, we are at risk of default on our obligations.
One of our current tax protection agreements requires, and any tax protection agreements we enter into in the future may require,
UELP to maintain for specified periods of time secured debt on certain of our assets and/or allocate partnership debt to such limited
partners to enable them to continue to defer recognition of their taxable gain with respect to the contributed properties. If the failure
of UELP to maintain such levels of debt causes any such contributor to recognize gain, we may be required to deliver to such
contributor a cash payment intended to approximate the contributor’s tax liability resulting from such failure and certain tax
liabilities incurred as a result of such tax protection payment. This tax protection agreement may restrict UELP’s ability to repay
or refinance debt or require UELP to maintain more or different debt than UELP would otherwise require for our business.
Rising interest rates could adversely affect our cash flows.
Of our $1.6 billion of debt outstanding as of December 31, 2017, $169.5 million bears interest at variable rates. We have a $600
million revolving credit facility, on which no balance is outstanding at December 31, 2017, that bears interest at London Interbank
Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin of 1.10% to 1.55% and an annual facility fee of 15 to 35 basis points, dependent
on our current leverage ratio. We may continue borrow additional funds at variable interest rates in the future. Increases in interest
rates would increase the interest expense on our variable rate debt and reduce our cash flow, which could adversely affect our
ability to service our debt and meet our other obligations and also could reduce the amount we are able to distribute to our
shareholders.
Defaults on secured indebtedness may result in foreclosure.
In the event that we default on mortgages in the future, either as a result of ceasing to make debt service payments or failing to
meet applicable covenants, the lenders may accelerate the related debt obligations and foreclose and/or take control of the properties
that secure their loans. As of December 31, 2017, we had $1.6 billion of secured debt outstanding and 32 of our properties were
encumbered by secured debt. Further, for tax purposes, the foreclosure of a mortgage may result in the recognition of taxable
income related to the extinguished debt without us having received any accompanying cash proceeds. As a result, since we are
structured as a REIT, we may be required to identify and utilize sources for distributions to our shareholders related to such taxable
income in order to avoid incurring corporate tax or to meet the REIT distribution requirements imposed by the Code.
We may not be able to obtain capital to make investments.
We depend primarily on external financing to fund the growth of our business because one of the requirements of the Code for a
REIT is that it distributes at least 90% of its taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to its shareholders. There is a separate
requirement to distribute net capital gains or pay a corporate level tax in lieu thereof. Our access to debt or equity financing depends
on the willingness of third parties to lend to or to make equity investments and on conditions in the capital markets generally.
There can be no assurance that new financing or other capital will be available or available on acceptable terms. The failure to
obtain financing or other capital could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
For information about our available sources of funds, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources” and the notes to the audited consolidated and combined financial
statements included in Part II, Item 8. in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
12
We may fail to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT and may be required to pay income taxes at corporate rates.
Although we believe that we will remain organized and will continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax
purposes, we may fail to remain so qualified. Qualifications are governed by highly technical and complex provisions of the Code
for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and that depend on various facts and circumstances that
are not entirely within our control. In addition, legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may
significantly change the relevant tax laws and/or the federal income tax consequences of qualifying as a REIT. If, with respect to
any taxable year, we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT and do not qualify under statutory relief provisions, we could not
deduct distributions to shareholders in computing our taxable income and would have to pay federal income tax on our taxable
income at regular corporate rates. The federal income tax payable would include any applicable alternative minimum tax (which,
for corporations, was repealed for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 under the TCJA). If we had to pay federal income
tax, the amount of money available to distribute to shareholders and pay our indebtedness would be reduced for the year or years
involved, and we would no longer be required to make distributions to shareholders. In addition, we would also be disqualified
as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost unless we were entitled to relief under
the relevant statutory provisions.
We are also required to pay certain corporate-level taxes on our assets located in Puerto Rico and such taxes may increase if
recently proposed taxes are implemented.
REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to execute our business plan.
To qualify to be taxed as a REIT, and assuming that certain other requirements are also satisfied, we generally must distribute at
least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital
gains, to our shareholders each year so that U.S. federal corporate income tax does not apply to earnings that we distribute. To the
extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement and qualify for taxation as a REIT, but distribute less than 100% of our REIT
taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and including any net capital gains, we will be subject
to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed net taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible
excise tax if the actual amount that we distribute to our shareholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified
under U.S. federal income tax laws. We intend to distribute 100% of our REIT taxable income to our shareholders.
From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our cash flow as a result of differences in timing between the
recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash or the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the effect of
limitations on interest and net operating loss deductibility under the TCJA, the creation of reserves, or required debt or amortization
payments. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we could be required to borrow funds on unfavorable terms,
sell assets at disadvantageous prices, distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions, capital expenditures
or repayment of debt, or make taxable distributions of our shares or debt securities to make distributions sufficient to enable us
to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and avoid corporate income tax and the 4%
excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity. Further, amounts distributed will
not be available to fund investment activities. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to grow, which
could adversely affect the value of our shares. Any restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness or make certain
distributions could preclude us from meeting the 90% distribution requirement. Decreases in funds from operations due to
unfinanced expenditures for acquisitions of properties or increases in the number of shares outstanding without commensurate
increases in funds from operations would adversely affect our ability to maintain distributions to our shareholders. Consequently,
there can be no assurance that we will be able to make distributions at the anticipated distribution rate or any other rate.
If a transaction intended to qualify as a Section 1031 Exchange is later determined to be taxable, we may face adverse
consequences, and if the laws applicable to such transactions are amended or repealed, we may not be able to dispose of
properties on a tax deferred basis.
From time to time we may dispose of properties in transactions that are intended to qualify as “like kind exchanges” under Section
1031 of the Code (“Section 1031 Exchanges”). It is possible that the qualification of a transaction as a Section 1031 Exchange
could be successfully challenged and determined to be currently taxable. In such case, our taxable income and earnings and profits
would increase. In some circumstances, we may be required to pay additional dividends or, in lieu of that, corporate income tax,
possibly including interest and penalties. As a result, we may be required to borrow funds in order to pay additional dividends or
taxes, and the payment of such taxes could cause us to have less cash available to distribute to our shareholders. In addition, if a
Section 1031 Exchange were later to be determined to be taxable, we may be required to amend our tax returns for the applicable
year in question, including any information reports we sent our shareholders. Moreover, it is possible that legislation could be
enacted that could modify or repeal the laws with respect to Section 1031 Exchanges, which could make it more difficult or not
possible for us to dispose of properties on a tax deferred basis.
13
We are subject to litigation that may negatively impact our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.
We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits and regulatory proceedings relating to our business. Due to the inherent uncertainties
of litigation and regulatory proceedings, we may not be able to accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such litigation or
proceedings. A significant unfavorable outcome could negatively impact our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.
If the distribution by each of Vornado and VRLP together with certain related transactions does not qualify as a transaction
that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Vornado and Vornado shareholders could be subject to significant
tax liabilities.
Vornado received a private letter ruling from the IRS to the effect that the distribution of UE common shares by each of Vornado
and its operating partnership, Vornado Realty L.P. (“VRLP”), together with certain related transactions, will, with respect to UE,
VRLP, Vornado and the shareholders of Vornado, qualify as transactions that are generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax
purposes under Sections 351 and 355 of the Code. Vornado obtained an opinion from of Roberts & Holland LLP, special tax
counsel to Vornado, satisfactory to the Vornado Board of Trustees, to the effect that the distribution of UE common shares by each
of Vornado and VRLP, together with certain related transactions, with respect to UE, VRLP, Vornado and the shareholders of
Vornado, qualifies as transactions that are generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 351, 355, and
731 of the Code, including with respect to certain matters relating to these transactions that are not covered by the private letter
ruling from the IRS. The private letter ruling is, and the opinion of Roberts & Holland LLP is based on, among other things, certain
facts and assumptions, as well as certain representations, statements and undertakings of Vornado and UE (including those relating
to the past and future conduct of Vornado and UE). If any of these representations, statements or undertakings are, or become,
inaccurate or incomplete, or if Vornado or UE breach any of their respective covenants in the separation documents, the private
letter ruling from the IRS and the opinion of Roberts & Holland LLP may be invalid and the conclusions reached therein could
be jeopardized. In such case, the IRS could assert that the distribution of UE common shares by each of Vornado and VRLP,
together with certain related transactions, should be treated as a taxable transaction. The opinion of Roberts & Holland LLP is not
binding on the IRS or any courts.
If the distribution, together with certain related transactions, fails to qualify for tax-free treatment, in general, Vornado would
recognize taxable gain as if it had sold the UE common shares in a taxable sale for its fair market value and Vornado shareholders
who received UE common shares in the distribution could be subject to tax as if they had received a taxable distribution equal to
the fair market value of such shares.
The terms of our agreements with Vornado relating to the separation and distribution may result in indemnification or tax
liabilities which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. Because these and other terms of our agreements
with Vornado were not negotiated at arm’s length, we may have been able to achieve more favorable terms from unaffiliated
third parties.
In connection with the separation and distribution, we entered into certain agreements with Vornado, including a separation
agreement between UE and Vornado (the “Separation Agreement”) and a tax matters agreement between UE and Vornado (the
“Tax Matters Agreement”). These agreements govern certain aspects of our relationship with Vornado. For example, the Tax
Matters Agreement governs Vornado’s and UE’s respective rights, responsibilities and obligations with respect to taxes and
liabilities, including taxes arising in the ordinary course of business, taxes, if any, incurred as a result of any failure of the spin
and certain related transactions to qualify as tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, tax attributes, tax returns, tax elections,
tax contests and certain other tax matters. Pursuant to the agreement, UE may be required to indemnify Vornado against additional
taxes resulting from any violation of a covenant or any inaccuracy or falsity of a representation made by UE under the agreement.
The Separation Agreement also contains indemnification provisions which may make us financially responsible for substantially
all liabilities that may exist relating to our business activities, whether incurred prior to or after the separation and distribution, as
well as those obligations of Vornado that we assumed pursuant to the Separation Agreement. These indemnity obligations could
be substantial.
The terms of our Agreements, including those relating to tax and indemnification, were determined while we were still a wholly-
owned subsidiary of Vornado. They were determined by persons who were, at the time, employees, officers or trustees of Vornado
or its subsidiaries and, accordingly, had a conflict of interest. For example, during the period in which the terms of those agreements
were prepared, we did not have a board of trustees that was independent of Vornado. As a result, the terms of those agreements
may not reflect terms that would have resulted from arm’s-length negotiations between unaffiliated third parties. Arm’s-length
negotiations between Vornado and an unaffiliated third party in another form of transaction, such as a buyer in a sale of a business
transaction, may have resulted in more favorable terms to the unaffiliated third party. See “Certain Relationships and Related
Person Transactions.”
14
In connection with our separation from Vornado, Vornado will indemnify us for certain pre-distribution liabilities and liabilities
related to Vornado assets. However, there can be no assurance that these indemnities will be sufficient to protect us against
the full amount of such liabilities, or that Vornado’s ability to satisfy its indemnification obligation will not be impaired in the
future.
Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Vornado has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities. However, third parties could
seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that Vornado agreed to retain and to indemnify us from and there can be no
assurance that Vornado will be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. Moreover, even if we ultimately succeed in
recovering from Vornado any amounts for which we are held liable, such indemnification may be insufficient to fully offset the
financial impact of such liabilities and we may be temporarily required to bear these losses while seeking recovery from Vornado.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON SHARES
The market prices and trading volume of our equity securities may be volatile.
The market prices of our equity securities depend on various factors which may be unrelated to our operating performance or
prospects. We cannot assure you that the market prices of our equity securities, including our common shares, will not fluctuate
or decline significantly in the future.
A number of factors could negatively affect, or result in fluctuations in, the prices or trading volume of equity securities, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
actual or anticipated changes in our operating results and changes in expectations of future financial performance;
our operating performance and the performance of other similar companies;
changes in the real estate industry, and in the retail industry, including growth in e-commerce, catalog companies and
direct consumer sales;
our strategic decisions, such as acquisitions, dispositions, spin-offs, joint ventures, strategic investments or changes in
business strategy;
equity issuances or buybacks by us or the perception that such issuances or buybacks may occur or adverse reaction
market reaction to any indebtedness we incur;
increases in market interest rates or decreases in our distributions to shareholders;
changes in real estate valuations or market valuations of similar companies;
additions or departures of key management personnel;
publication of research reports about us or our industry by securities analysts, or negative speculation in the press or
investment community;
the passage of legislation or other regulatory developments that adversely affect us, our tax status, or our industry;
changes in accounting principles;
our failure to satisfy the listing requirements of the NYSE;
our failure to comply with the requirements of the Sarbanes Oxley Act;
our failure to qualify as a REIT; and
general market conditions, including factors unrelated to our performance.
In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the price
of their common stock. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources,
which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.
We cannot guarantee the timing, amount, or payment of dividends on our common shares.
Although we expect to pay regular cash dividends, the timing, declaration, amount and payment of dividends to shareholders falls
within the discretion of the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees’ decisions regarding the payment of dividends depends on
factors such as our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, debt service obligations, limitations under our financing
arrangements, industry practice, legal requirements, regulatory constraints, and other considerations that it deems relevant. Our
ability to pay dividends depends on our ongoing ability to generate cash from operations and access to the capital markets. We
cannot guarantee that we will pay dividends in the future.
15
Your percentage of ownership in the Company may be diluted in the future.
In the future, your ownership in us may be diluted because of equity issuances for acquisitions, capital market transactions or
otherwise. For example, in August 2016, we entered into distribution agreements with various financial institutions as part of our
implementation of a continuous equity offering program (the "ATM Program") under which we may sell up to $250 million in
common shares, par value of $0.01 per share, from time to time in “at-the-market” offerings or certain other transactions, and in
2017 we issued 13.95 million common shares in two separate offerings. In addition, we have and anticipate that we will continue
to grant compensatory equity awards to our trustees, officers, employees, advisers and consultants who will provide services to
us. The issuance of additional common shares, including sales under the ATM Program and awards to our executives, would dilute
the interests of our current shareholders, and could depress the market price of our common shares, impair our ability to raise
capital through the sale of additional equity securities, or impact our ability to pay dividends. We cannot predict the effect that
future sales of our common shares or other equity-related securities including the issuance of Operating Partnership units would
have on the market price of our common shares.
In addition, the Company’s Declaration of Trust authorizes us to issue, without the approval of our shareholders, one or more
classes or series of preferred shares having such designation, voting powers, preferences, rights and other terms, including
preferences over our common shares respecting dividends and other distributions, as the Board of Trustees generally may determine.
The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred shares could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of our common
shares. For example, we could grant the holders of preferred shares the right to elect some number of our trustees in all events or
on the occurrence of specified events, or the right to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the repurchase or redemption rights or
liquidation preferences we could assign to holders of preferred shares could affect the residual value of the common shares.
Increases in market interest rates may result in a decrease in the value of our publicly-traded equity securities.
One of the factors that may influence the prices of our publicly-traded equity securities is the interest rate on our debt and the
dividend yield on our common and preferred shares relative to market interest rates. If market interest rates, which are currently
at low levels relative to historical rates, rise, our borrowing costs could rise and result in less funds being available for distribution.
Therefore, we may not be able to, or we may choose not to, provide a higher distribution rate on our common stock. In addition,
fluctuations in interest rates could adversely affect the market value of our properties. These factors could result in a decline in
the market prices of our publicly-traded equity securities.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE
The Company’s Declaration of Trust sets limits on the ownership of our shares.
Generally, for us to maintain a qualification as a REIT under the Code, not more than fifty percent (50%) in value of the outstanding
shares of beneficial interest of the Company may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during
the last half of the Company’s taxable year. The Code defines “individuals” for purposes of the requirement described in the
preceding sentence to include some types of entities. Under the Company’s Declaration of Trust, no person or entity (or group
thereof) may own more than 9.8% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding shares of any
class or series, with some exceptions for persons or entities approved by the Board of Trustees. A transfer of shares of beneficial
interest of the Company to a person who, as a result of the transfer, violates the ownership limit will be void under certain
circumstances, and, in any event, would deny that person any of the economic benefits of owning shares in excess of the ownership
limit. These restrictions on transferability and ownership may delay, deter or prevent a change in control of the Company or other
transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of the shareholders.
The Company’s Declaration of Trust limits the removal of members of the Board of Trustees.
The Company’s Declaration of Trust provides that, subject to the rights of holders of one or more classes or series of preferred
shares to elect or remove one or more trustees, a trustee may be removed only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of two-
thirds of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of trustees. This provision, when coupled with the exclusive power of the
Board of Trustees to fill vacancies on the Board of Trustees, precludes shareholders from removing incumbent trustees except for
cause and upon a substantial affirmative vote and filling the vacancies created by the removal with their own nominees. These
limitations may delay, deter or prevent a change in control of the Company or other transactions that might involve a premium
price or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders.
Maryland law contains provisions that may reduce the likelihood of certain takeover transactions.
Certain provisions of Maryland law, may have the effect of inhibiting a third-party from making a proposal to acquire us or of
impeding a change in control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our shares, including:
16
•
•
“Business combination” provisions that, subject to certain exceptions, prohibit certain business combinations between
us and an “interested shareholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting
power of our shares or an affiliate thereof or an affiliate or associate of ours who was the beneficial owner, directly or
indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding voting shares at any time within the two-year
period immediately prior to the date in question) for five years after the most recent date on which the shareholder becomes
an interested shareholder, and thereafter impose fair price or super majority shareholder voting requirements on these
combinations; and
“Control share” provisions that provide that holders of “control shares” of the Company (defined as shares that, when
aggregated with other shares controlled by the shareholder, entitle the shareholder to exercise voting power in the election
of trustees within one of three increasing ranges) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect
acquisition of ownership or control of the voting power of issued and outstanding “control shares,” subject to certain
exceptions) have no voting rights with respect to their control shares, except to the extent approved by our shareholders
by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested
shares.
As permitted by Maryland law, the Company’s Bylaws provide that we will not be subject to the control share provisions of
Maryland law. However, we cannot assure you that the Board of Trustees will not revise the Company’s Bylaws in order to be
subject to such control share provisions in the future.
Certain provisions of Maryland law permit the board of trustees of a Maryland real estate investment trust with at least three
independent trustees and a class of shares registered under the Exchange Act, without shareholder approval and regardless of what
is currently provided in its declaration of trust or bylaws, to implement certain corporate governance provisions, some of which
(for example, implementing a classified board) are not currently applicable to us. These provisions may have the effect of limiting
or precluding a third party from making an unsolicited acquisition proposal for the Company or of delaying, deferring or preventing
a change in control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of shares of our shares with the opportunity to
realize a premium over the then current market price.
We may issue additional shares in a manner that could adversely affect the likelihood of certain takeover transactions.
The Company’s Declaration of Trust and Bylaws authorize the Board of Trustees in its sole discretion and without shareholder
approval, to:
•
•
•
•
cause the Company to issue additional authorized, but unissued, common or preferred shares;
classify or reclassify, in one or more classes or series, any unissued common or preferred shares;
set the preferences, rights and other terms of any classified or reclassified shares that the Company issues; and
increase the number of shares of beneficial interest that the Company may issue.
The Board of Trustees can establish a class or series of common or preferred shares whose terms could delay, deter or prevent a
change in control of the Company or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of
the Company’s shareholders. The Company’s Declaration of Trust and Bylaws contain other provisions that may delay, deter or
prevent a change in control of the Company or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best
interest of our shareholders and the Company.
We may change our policies without obtaining the approval of our shareholders.
Our operating and financial policies, including our policies with respect to acquisitions of real estate or other companies, growth,
operations, indebtedness, capitalization and dividends, are exclusively determined by the Board of Trustees. Accordingly, our
shareholders do not control these policies.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
There are no unresolved comments from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
17
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2017, our portfolio is comprised of 85 shopping centers, four malls and a warehouse park totaling approximately
16.7 million square feet. We own 66 shopping centers 100% in fee simple and own a 95% interest in Walnut Creek (Mt. Diablo).
We lease 18 properties under ground and/or building leases as indicated in the table below. Where a property is subject to a ground
and/or building lease to a third party, we have included the year of contractual maturity of the lease next to the name of the property.
As of December 31, 2017, we had $1.6 billion of outstanding mortgage indebtedness which is secured by our properties. The
following pages provide details of our properties as of December 31, 2017.
Property
SHOPPING CENTERS AND MALLS:
California:
Signal Hill
Vallejo (leased through 2043)(6)
Walnut Creek (Olympic)(5)
Walnut Creek (Mt. Diablo)(3)
Connecticut:
Newington
Maryland:
Baltimore (Towson)(5)
Glen Burnie
Rockville
Wheaton (leased through 2060)(6)
Massachusetts:
Cambridge (leased through 2033)(6)
Chicopee
Milford (leased through 2019)(6)
Springfield
Missouri:
Manchester(5)
New Hampshire:
Salem (leased through 2102)(6)
New Jersey:
Bergen Town Center - East, Paramus
Bergen Town Center - West, Paramus
Brick
Carlstadt (leased through 2050)(6)
Cherry Hill (Cherry Hill Commons)
Cherry Hill (Plaza at Cherry Hill)(5)
East Brunswick
Total Square
Feet (1)
Percent
Leased(1)
Weighted
Average
Annual Rent
per sq ft (2)
Major Tenants
45,000
45,000
31,000
7,000
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
$26.49
19.26
70.00
Best Buy
Best Buy
Anthropologie
118.45
Z Gallerie
189,000
100.0%
9.87
Walmart, Staples
155,000
100.0%
23.96
121,000
100.0%
94,000
66,000
98.1%
100.0%
10.16
26.02
16.70
Staples, HomeGoods, Golf Galaxy, Tuesday Morning,
Ulta, Kirkland's, Five Below, Sprouts (under
construction)
Gavigan's Home Furnishings, Pep Boys
Regal Cinemas
Best Buy
48,000
224,000
83,000
182,000
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
23.44
PetSmart, Modell’s Sporting Goods
5.50
9.01
5.59
Walmart
Kohl’s
Walmart
131,000
88.8%
11.52
Academy Sports, Bob's Discount Furniture, Pan-Asia
Market
37,000
100.0%
12.58
Babies "R" Us
212,000
955,000
97.0%
99.0%
278,000
78,000
261,000
413,000
100.0%
100.0%
98.5%
74.0%
427,000
100.0%
19.41
32.09
18.78
23.66
9.57
13.07
15.03
20.40
34.71
12.11
20.83
Lowe's, REI, Kirkland's, Best Buy (under construction)
Target, Century 21, Whole Foods Market, Marshalls,
Nordstrom Rack, Saks Off 5th, HomeGoods, H&M,
Bloomingdale's Outlet, Nike Factory Store, Old Navy,
Neiman Marcus Last Call Studio
Kohl's, ShopRite, Marshalls, Kirkland's
Stop & Shop
Walmart, Toys “R” Us, Maxx Fitness
LA Fitness, Aldi, Raymour & Flanigan, Restoration
Hardware, Total Wine, Guitar Center, Sam Ash Music
Lowe’s, Kohl’s, Dick’s Sporting Goods, P.C. Richard
& Son, T.J. Maxx, LA Fitness
The Home Depot, Dick's Sporting Goods, Saks Off
Fifth, Marshalls, Burlington
REI
Lowe’s
New York Sports Club
18
East Hanover (200 - 240 Route 10 West)
343,000
99.2%
East Hanover (280 Route 10 West)
East Rutherford
Englewood(5)
28,000
100.0%
197,000
41,000
96.2%
64.1%
Garfield
Hackensack
Hazlet
Jersey City (Hudson Mall)(5)
Jersey City (Hudson Commons)
Kearny
Lawnside
Lodi (Route 17 North)
Lodi (Washington Street)
Manalapan
Marlton
Middletown
Millburn(5)
Montclair
Morris Plains(5)
North Bergen (Kennedy Blvd)
North Bergen (Tonnelle Ave)
North Plainfield
Paramus (leased through 2033)(6)
Rockaway
South Plainfield (leased through 2039)(6)
Totowa
Turnersville
Union (2445 Springfield Ave)
Union (Route 22 and Morris Ave)
Watchung
Westfield (One Lincoln Plaza)(5)
Woodbridge (Woodbridge Commons)
Woodbridge (Plaza at Woodbridge)(5)
New York:
Bronx (1750-1780 Gun Hill Road)
Bronx (Bruckner Boulevard)(5)
Bronx (Shops at Bruckner)(5)
Buffalo (Amherst)
Commack (leased through 2021)(6)
Dewitt (leased through 2041)(6)
Freeport (240 West Sunrise Highway) (leased
through 2040)(6)
Freeport (160 East Sunrise Highway)
Huntington
Inwood
Mt. Kisco
New Hyde Park (leased through 2029)(6)
Oceanside
Queens
Rochester
Rochester (Henrietta) (leased through 2056)(6)
Staten Island
West Babylon
Yonkers Gateway Center(5)
273,000
275,000
100.0%
98.5%
95,000
100.0%
383,000
236,000
104,000
145,000
171,000
85,000
97.3%
100.0%
98.2%
100.0%
100.0%
87.6%
208,000
100.0%
213,000
231,000
104,000
100.0%
99.1%
98.6%
18,000
100.0%
177,000
62,000
65.3%
95.3%
410,000
100.0%
241,000
95.7%
63,000
100.0%
181,000
56,000
95.0%
96.3%
271,000
100.0%
98,000
232,000
276,000
170,000
100.0%
100.0%
99.4%
98.3%
22,000
100.0%
226,000
411,000
76.7%
80.6%
77,000
100.0%
374,000
90.6%
114,000
311,000
47,000
46,000
44,000
173,000
205,000
100,000
189,000
101,000
16,000
46,000
205,000
165,000
165,000
66,000
437,000
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.6%
100.0%
100.0%
74.2%
100.0%
100.0%
93.2%
97.6%
87.6%
14.28
23.24
3.70
14.05
12.37
19.53
14.66
12.87
20.77
17.78
14.20
13.17
25.36
26.20
24.00
12.72
20.59
10.71
47.18
15.27
21.54
17.26
9.62
17.85
18.22
16.84
33.33
13.18
17.06
35.26
23.19
34.06
9.77
20.69
22.51
22.31
21.95
15.66
19.59
16.32
20.21
28.00
39.31
3.08
4.55
24.22
17.61
16.11
Walmart, Burlington, Marshalls, PetSmart, Ulta
The Home Depot, Staples, Petco, 99 Ranch
Stop & Shop(4)
Marshalls, Big Lots, Toys "R" Us, Staples, Old Navy
Lowe’s, P.C. Richard & Son
LA Fitness, Marshalls
The Home Depot, PetSmart
National Wholesale Liquidators
Blink Fitness, Aldi
Best Buy, Bed Bath & Beyond, Babies “R” Us, Modell’s
Sporting Goods, PetSmart
Kohl’s, ShopRite, PetSmart
Kohl’s, Stop & Shop
Trader Joe's, CVS, PetSmart
Whole Foods Market
Kohl’s
Food Bazaar
Walmart, BJ’s Wholesale Club, PetSmart, Staples
Costco, The Tile Shop, La-Z-Boy, Petco
24 Hour Fitness
ShopRite, T.J. Maxx
Staples, Party City
The Home Depot, Bed Bath & Beyond, buybuy Baby,
Marshalls, Staples
Haynes Furniture Outlet (DBA The Dump)
The Home Depot
Lowe’s, Toys “R” Us, Office Depot
BJ’s Wholesale Club
Five Guys, PNC Bank, Cake Boss
Walmart
Best Buy, Raymour & Flanigan, Toys “R” Us, Lincoln
Tech, Harbor Freight, Retro Fitness
Planet Fitness, Aldi
Kmart, Toys “R” Us, Burlington (under construction),
ShopRite (under construction)
Marshalls, Old Navy
BJ’s Wholesale Club, T.J. Maxx, HomeGoods, Toys “R”
Us, LA Fitness
PetSmart, Ace Hardware
Best Buy
Bob’s Discount Furniture
The Home Depot, Staples
Kmart, Marshalls, Old Navy, Petco
Stop & Shop
Target, Stop & Shop
Stop & Shop
Party City
Walmart
Kohl’s
Western Beef, Planet Fitness, Mavis Discount Tire
Best Market, Rite Aid
Burlington, Best Buy, DSW, PetSmart, Alamo
Drafthouse Cinema
19
Pennsylvania:
Allentown
Bensalem
Bethlehem
Broomall
Glenolden
Lancaster
Springfield (leased through 2025)(6)
Wilkes-Barre (461 - 499 Mundy Street)
Wyomissing (leased through 2065)(6)
York
South Carolina:
Charleston (leased through 2063)(6)
Virginia:
Norfolk (leased through 2069)(6)
Tyson’s Corner (leased through 2035)(6)
Puerto Rico:
Las Catalinas
Montehiedra(5)
372,000
100.0%
185,000
153,000
169,000
102,000
228,000
41,000
205,000
100.0%
95.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
97.2%
76,000
93.4%
111,000
100.0%
12.30
12.90
8.17
10.25
12.52
4.79
22.99
12.38
16.99
9.21
Burlington, Giant Food, Dick's Sporting Goods, T.J.
Maxx, Petco, Big Lots
Kohl's, Ross Dress for Less, Staples, Petco
Giant Food, Petco
Giant Food, Planet Fitness, A.C. Moore, PetSmart
Walmart
Lowe's, Community Aid, Mattress Firm
PetSmart
Bob's Discount Furniture, Babies "R" Us, Ross Dress
for Less, Marshalls, Petco
LA Fitness, PetSmart
Ashley Furniture, Tractor Supply Company, Aldi,
Crunch Fitness
45,000
100.0%
14.69
Best Buy
114,000
38,000
100.0%
100.0%
356,000
539,000
91.8%
93.5%
7.08
43.04
33.67
18.03
BJ’s Wholesale Club
Best Buy
Kmart, Forever 21
Kmart, The Home Depot, Marshalls, Caribbean
Cinemas, Tiendas Capri
Total Shopping Centers and Malls
15,743,000
96.0%
$17.38
WAREHOUSES:
East Hanover - Five Buildings(5)
942,000
100.0%
5.15
J & J Tri-State Delivery, Foremost Groups Inc., PCS
Wireless, Fidelity Paper & Supply Inc., Meyer
Distributing Inc., Consolidated Simon Distributors
Inc., Givaudan Flavors Corp., Reliable Tire (under
construction)
Total Urban Edge Properties
16,685,000
96.3%
$16.67
(1) Percent leased is expressed as the percentage of gross leasable area subject to a lease.
(2) Weighted average annual base rent per square foot is the current base rent on an annualized basis. It includes executed leases for which rent has not commenced
and excludes tenant expense reimbursements, free rent periods, concessions and storage rent. Excluding ground leases where the Company is the lessor, the
weighted average annual rent per square foot for our retail portfolio is $19.84 per square foot.
(3) Our ownership of Walnut Creek (Mt. Diablo) is 95% at December 31, 2017.
(4) The tenant has ceased operations at this location but continues to pay rent.
(5) Property is excluded from the same-property pool for the purposes of calculating same-property cash NOI for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017.
(6) The Company is a lessee under a ground or building lease. The total square feet disclosed for the building will revert to the lessor upon lease expiration.
As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately 1,200 leases. Tenant leases for under 10,000 square feet generally have lease
terms of five years or less. Tenant leases for 10,000 square feet or more generally have lease terms of 10 to 25 years, and are
considered anchor leases with one or more renewal options available upon expiration of the initial lease term. The majority of our
leases provide for reimbursements of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance charges (including roof and
structure in shopping centers, unless it is the tenant’s direct responsibility), and percentage rents based on tenant sales volume.
Percentage rents accounted for less than 1% of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017.
20
Occupancy
The following table sets forth the consolidated retail portfolio occupancy rate (excluding warehouses), square footage and weighted
average annual base rent per square foot of properties in our retail portfolio as of December 31 for the last five years:
Total square feet
Occupancy rate
Average annual base rent per sf
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
15,743,000
13,831,000
13,901,000
13,880,000
13,922,000
96.0%
$17.38
97.2%
$17.07
96.2%
$16.64
95.8%
$16.57
95.6%
$16.38
December 31,
The following table sets forth the occupancy rate, square footage and weighted average annual base rent per square foot of our
warehouses as of December 31 for the last five years:
2017
942,000
100.0%
$5.15
2016
942,000
91.7%
$4.77
December 31,
2015
942,000
79.1%
$4.80
2014
942,000
60.8%
$4.41
2013
942,000
45.6%
$4.35
Total square feet
Occupancy rate
Average annual base rent per sf
Major Tenants
The following table sets forth information for the 10 largest tenants by total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017:
Tenant
The Home Depot, Inc.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
The TJX Companies, Inc.(1)
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Ahold Delhaize(2)
Best Buy Co., Inc.
Kohl's Corporation
Sears Holdings Corporation(3)
BJ's Wholesale Club
PetSmart, Inc.
Number of
Stores
7
9
17
6
9
9
8
4
4
12
Square Feet
920,000
1,439,000
607,000
976,000
656,000
401,000
716,000
547,000
454,000
287,000
% of Total
Square Feet
5.7%
8.9%
3.8%
6.0%
4.1%
2.5%
4.4%
3.4%
2.8%
1.8%
2017 Revenues
22,326,945
$
18,964,600
14,649,806
13,759,344
11,904,801
10,701,198
10,206,380
8,320,089
8,232,480
8,126,969
% of Total
Revenues
5.5%
4.7%
3.6%
3.4%
2.9%
2.6%
2.5%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
(1) Includes Marshalls (11), T.J. Maxx (4) and HomeGoods (2).
(2) Includes Stop & Shop (6) and Giant Food (3).
(3) Includes Kmart (4).
21
Lease Expirations
The following table sets forth the anticipated expirations of tenant leases in our consolidated portfolio for each year from 2018
through 2028 and thereafter, assuming no exercise of renewal options or early termination rights:
Year
Month-To-Month
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
Thereafter
Sub-total/Average
Vacant
Total
Number of
Expiring Leases
Square Feet of
Expiring Leases
Percentage of
Retail Properties
Square Feet
Weighted Average Annual
Base Rent of Expiring Leases
Total
Per Square Foot
27
83
133
100
94
98
72
62
42
56
54
33
59
913
71
984
69,000
601,000
1,416,000
1,394,000
1,080,000
1,442,000
1,644,000
1,491,000
598,000
655,000
819,000
487,000
3,423,000
15,119,000
624,000
15,743,000
0.4%
3.8%
9.0%
8.8%
6.9%
9.2%
10.4%
9.5%
3.8%
4.2%
5.2%
3.1%
21.7%
96.0%
4.0%
100.0%
$
2,398,440
10,487,450
29,042,160
26,081,740
23,932,800
20,966,680
29,345,400
20,829,270
10,405,200
8,829,400
16,543,800
12,106,820
50,283,870
$
$
261,407,510
N/A
261,407,510
$34.76
17.45 (1)
20.51 (1)
18.71
22.16
14.54
17.85
13.97
17.40
13.48
20.20
24.86
14.69
$17.29
N/A
N/A
(1) We expect to achieve moderate increases in average rents as we renew or re-lease these spaces.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are party to various legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal
counsel, the outcome of such matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
22
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
PART II
Urban Edge Properties
Market Information and Dividends
Our common shares are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “UE”. Our common shares began “regular way” trading on January 15,
2015. As of February 13, 2018, there were approximately 1,377 holders of record of our common shares. The following table sets
forth the high and low sales prices and the cash dividends declared on our common shares by quarter for 2017 and 2016:
2017
2016
High Price Low Price
Declared Per Share High Price Low Price
Cash Dividends
Cash Dividends
Declared Per Share
Quarter Ended
Fourth quarter
$
26.19
$
23.18
$
Third quarter
Second quarter
First quarter
25.92
27.70
28.90
23.46
23.13
24.50
0.22
0.22
0.22
0.22
$
28.36
$
24.10
$
30.29
29.87
26.18
26.69
24.36
21.77
0.22
0.20
0.20
0.20
The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, commencing
with the filing of its 2015 tax return for its tax year ended December 31, 2015. Under those sections, a REIT which distributes at
least 90% of its REIT taxable income as a dividend to its shareholders each year and which meets certain other conditions will
not be taxed on that portion of its taxable income which is distributed to its shareholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any
taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any alternative minimum tax, which,
for corporations, was repealed for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 under the TCJA) and may not be able to qualify
as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years.
Future distributions will be declared and paid at the discretion of the Board of Trustees and will depend upon cash generated by
operating activities, our financial condition, capital requirements, annual dividend requirements under the REIT provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and such other factors as our Board of Trustees deems relevant.
Our total annual dividends per common share for 2017 was $0.88 per share. The annual dividend amount may differ from dividends
as calculated for federal income tax purposes. Distributions to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for
federal income tax purposes generally will be taxable to a shareholder as ordinary dividend income. However, the TCJA provides
a deduction of up to 20% of a non-corporate taxpayer’s ordinary REIT dividends with such deduction scheduled to expire for
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits will be
treated as a nontaxable reduction of the shareholder’s basis in such shareholder’s shares, to the extent thereof, and thereafter as
taxable capital gains. Distributions that are treated as a reduction of the shareholder’s basis in its shares will have the effect of
increasing the amount of gain, or reducing the amount of loss, recognized upon the sale of the shareholder’s shares. No assurances
can be given regarding what portion, if any, of distributions in 2017 or subsequent years will constitute a return of capital for
federal income tax purposes. During a year in which a REIT earns a net long-term capital gain, the REIT can elect under Section
857(b)(3) of the Code to designate a portion of dividends paid to shareholders as capital gain dividends. If this election is made,
the capital gain dividends are generally taxable to the shareholder as long-term capital gains.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company elected, for tax purposes, to treat the wholly-owned limited partnership that holds its
Allentown property as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). A TRS is a corporation, other than a REIT, in which we directly or
indirectly hold stock, which has made a joint election with us to be treated as a TRS under Section 856(l) of the Code. A TRS is
required to pay regular U.S. federal income tax, and state and local income tax where applicable, as a non-REIT “C” corporation.
As a result, all future taxable income recognized by the TRS, including capital gains on the sale of the property held in the TRS,
will be subject to a corporate level tax.
The Allentown legal entity restructuring resulted in a capital gain recognized for tax purposes in 2017. Consequently, the Company
has determined that $0.37 of the $0.88 dividends distributed to shareholders in 2017 represented long-term capital gains. The
Company’s 2018 consolidated financial statements will reflect the TRS’ federal and state corporate income taxes associated with
the operating activities at its Allentown property until the expected sale date in the first quarter.
23
We have determined the dividends paid on our common shares during 2017 and 2016 qualify for the following tax treatment:
Total Distribution per Share
Ordinary Dividends
Long Term Capital Gains
Return of Capital
$
2017
2016
$
0.88
0.82
$
0.51
0.82
0.37
$
—
—
—
Total Shareholder Return Performance
The following performance graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return of our common shares with the Russell 2000
Index, the S&P 500 Index, SNL U.S. REIT Equity Index and the SNL REIT Retail Shopping Center Index as provided by SNL
Financial LC, from January 15, 2015 to December 31, 2017, assuming an investment of $100 and the reinvestment of all dividends
into additional common shares during the holding period. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future
results.
The performance graph shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this
annual report into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
except to the extent we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such
acts.
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN(1)
(1) $100 invested on January 15, 2015 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Stock/Index
UE
S&P 500
Russell 2000
SNL U.S. REIT Equity
Cumulative(1)
Total Return %
18.7
42.8
38.7
14.5
Total Return $ as of
1/15/2015
12/31/2015
12/31/2016
12/31/2017
100
100
100
100
101.4
104.7
99.7
97.1
122.6
117.2
120.9
105.7
SNL U.S. REIT Retail Shopping Center
(8.9)
(1) Cumulative total return is for the period from the separation date on January 15, 2015 to December 31, 2017.
98.9
100
102.4
118.7
142.8
138.7
114.5
91.1
24
Operating Partnership
Market Information and Distributions
There is no established public market for our general and common limited partnership interests in the operating partnership (“OP
Units”). As of February 13, 2018, there were 12,812,954 OP Units outstanding, held by approximately 31 holders of record. The
following table sets forth the cash distributions declared on our OP Units by quarter for 2017 and 2016:
Quarter Ended
Fourth quarter
Third quarter
Second quarter
First quarter
2017
Cash Distributions
Declared Per Unit
2016
Cash Distributions
Declared Per Unit
$
$
0.22
0.22
0.22
0.22
0.22
0.20
0.20
0.20
Under the limited partnership agreement of UELP, unitholders may present their common units of UELP for redemption at any
time (subject to restrictions agreed upon at the time of issuance of the units that may restrict such right for a period of time). Upon
presentation of a common unit for redemption, UELP must redeem the unit for cash equal to the then value of a share of UE’s
common shares, as defined by the limited partnership agreement. In lieu of cash redemption by UELP, however, UE may elect to
acquire any common units so tendered by issuing common shares of UE in exchange for the common units. If UE so elects, its
common shares will be exchanged for common units on a one-for-one basis. No units were redeemed during the year ended
December 31, 2017.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Shares
Under the terms of UELP’s limited partnership agreement, the common limited partnership units in our limited partnership may
be redeemed, subject to certain conditions, for cash or an equivalent number of our common shares, at our option. During the three
months ended December 31, 2017, there were no redemptions of operating partnership units.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
During 2017, 5,427 restricted common shares were forfeited by former employees. We did not repurchase any of our equity
securities during the three months ended December 31, 2017.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Information regarding equity compensation plans is presented in Part III, Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and
incorporated herein by reference.
25
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table includes selected consolidated and combined financial data set forth for the Company and the Operating
Partnership as of and for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2017. The consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 reflects the consolidation of properties that are wholly-owned and properties in which
we own less than 100% interest, but in which we have a controlling interest. The consolidated statement of income for the year
ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 includes the consolidated accounts of the Company. The consolidated and
combined statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2015 includes the consolidated accounts of the Company and the
combined accounts of the UE Business. Accordingly, the results presented for the year ended December 31, 2015 reflect the
aggregate operations, changes in cash flows and equity on a carved-out and combined basis for the period from January 1, 2015
through the date of separation and on a consolidated basis subsequent to the date of separation. The financial data for the periods
prior to the separation date are prepared on a carved-out and combined basis from the consolidated financial statements of Vornado
as the UE Business was under common control of Vornado prior to January 15, 2015. This selected financial data should be read
in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, and our audited
consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes included in Part II, Items 7 and 8, respectively, of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
Urban Edge Properties
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating Data:
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
Property rentals
$
265,984
$
236,798
$
231,867
$
232,592
$
228,282
Tenant expense reimbursements
Income from Stop & Shop settlement
Management and development fees
Income from acquired leasehold interest
Other income
Total revenue
Total expenses
Operating income
Net income
Net income attributable to operating partnership
Net income attributable to consolidated subsidiaries
Net income attributable to common shareholders(1)
$
99,098
—
1,535
39,215
1,210
407,042
245,278
161,764
72,938
(5,824)
(44)
67,070
$
84,921
84,617
81,887
—
1,759
—
2,498
325,976
192,958
133,018
96,630
(5,812)
(3)
90,815
$
—
2,261
—
4,200
322,945
224,869
98,076
41,348
(2,547)
(16)
38,785
—
535
—
662
315,676
193,236
122,440
65,794
—
(22)
65,772
$
$
73,170
59,599
606
—
1,338
362,995
195,782
167,213
109,335
—
(21)
109,314
Earnings per common share - Basic(2):
Earnings per common share - Diluted(2):
Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic(2)
Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted(2)
Dividends declared per common share
(1) Net income earned prior to January 15, 2015 is attributable to Vornado as it was the sole shareholder prior to January 15, 2015. Refer to Note
118,390
107,132
99,794
99,278
99,248
99,248
99,248
99,248
99,252
99,364
0.88
0.91
0.61
0.66
1.10
1.10
0.66
0.39
0.39
0.82
0.80
0.91
0.62
—
—
1 to the consolidated and combined financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2) The common shares outstanding at the date of separation are reflected as outstanding for all periods prior to the separation. Refer to Note 2
to the consolidated and combined financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
26
(Amounts in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data as of period end:
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
Total assets
Mortgages payable, net
Total liabilities
Noncontrolling interests in operating partnership
Total equity
Other Data:
Cash flow Statement Data:
Provided by operating activities
Used in investing activities
Provided by (used in) financing activities
Urban Edge Properties LP
(Amounts in thousands, except per unit amounts)
Operating Data:
2017
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2016
2014
2013
$ 2,084,727
2,820,808
1,564,542
1,830,267
100,218
990,541
$ 1,597,423
1,904,138
1,197,513
1,408,021
35,451
496,117
$ 1,575,530
1,918,931
1,233,983
1,447,477
33,177
471,454
$ 1,555,301
1,731,176
1,278,182
1,472,313
—
258,863
$ 1,562,416
1,749,965
1,200,762
1,408,381
—
341,584
157,898
(295,732)
498,489
137,249
(59,230)
(115,858)
138,078
(66,415)
93,795
105,688
(45,586)
(63,807)
240,527
(24,926)
(212,636)
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
Property rentals
$
265,984
$
236,798
$
231,867
$
232,592
$
228,282
Tenant expense reimbursements
Income from Stop & Shop settlement
Management and development fees
Income from acquired leasehold interest
Other income
Total revenue
Total expenses
Operating income
Net income
Net income attributable to consolidated subsidiaries
Net income attributable to unitholders(1)
$
99,098
—
1,535
39,215
1,210
407,042
245,278
161,764
84,921
—
1,759
2,498
325,976
192,958
133,018
72,938
(44)
72,894
$
96,630
(3)
96,627
$
84,617
—
2,261
4,200
322,945
224,869
98,076
41,348
(16)
41,332
81,887
—
535
662
315,676
193,236
122,440
65,794
(22)
65,772
$
$
73,170
59,599
606
1,338
362,995
195,782
167,213
109,335
(21)
109,314
Earnings per unit - Basic(2):
Earnings per unit - Diluted(2):
Weighted average units outstanding - Basic(2)
Weighted average units outstanding - Diluted(2)
Distributions declared per unit
0.88
(1) Net income earned prior to January 15, 2015 is attributable to Vornado as it was the sole unitholder prior to January 15, 2015. Refer to Note
106,099
105,374
105,455
105,276
104,965
104,965
118,390
104,965
104,965
117,779
0.61
1.04
0.91
0.39
0.82
0.80
0.63
0.39
1.04
0.91
0.62
0.63
—
—
1 to the consolidated and combined financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2) The units outstanding at the date of separation are reflected as outstanding for all periods prior to the separation. Refer to Note 2 to the
consolidated and combined financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
27
(Amounts in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data as of period end:
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
Total assets
Mortgages payable, net
Total liabilities
Total equity
Other Data:
Cash flow Statement Data:
Provided by operating activities
Used in investing activities
Provided by (used in) financing activities
2017
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2016
2013
$ 2,084,727
2,820,808
1,564,542
1,830,267
990,541
$ 1,597,423
1,904,138
1,197,513
1,408,021
496,117
$ 1,575,530
1,918,931
1,233,983
1,447,477
471,454
$ 1,555,301
1,731,176
1,278,182
1,472,313
258,863
$ 1,562,416
1,749,965
1,200,762
1,408,381
341,584
157,898
(295,732)
498,489
137,249
(59,230)
(115,858)
138,078
(66,415)
93,795
105,688
(45,586)
(63,807)
240,527
(24,926)
(212,636)
28
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Certain statements contained herein constitute forward-looking statements as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are
not guarantees of future performance. They represent our intentions, plans, expectations and beliefs and are subject to numerous
assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Our future results, financial condition and business may differ materially from those expressed
in these forward-looking statements. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “believes,” “expects,”
“anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “would,” “may” or other similar expressions in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Many of the factors that will determine the outcome of these and our other forward-looking statements are beyond our ability to
control or predict; these factors include, among others, the estimated remediation and repair costs related to Hurricane Maria and
the timing of re-opening and resumption of full operations at the affected properties. For further discussion of factors that could
materially affect the outcome of our forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A, of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable
to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred
to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and notes thereto
included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Executive Overview
Urban Edge Properties (“UE”, “Urban Edge”, or the “Company”) (NYSE: UE) is a Maryland real estate investment trust that
manages, develops, redevelops, and acquires retail real estate, primarily in the New York metropolitan area. Urban Edge Properties
LP (“UELP” or the “Operating Partnership”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed to serve as UE’s majority-owned partnership
subsidiary and to own, through affiliates, all of our real estate properties and other assets. Unless the context otherwise requires,
references to “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Urban Edge Properties and UELP and their consolidated entities/subsidiaries.
The Operating Partnership’s capital includes general and common limited partnership interests in the operating partnership (“OP
Units”). As of December 31, 2017, Urban Edge owned approximately 89.9% of the outstanding common OP Units with the
remaining limited OP Units held by Vornado Realty L.P., members of management, our Board of Trustees and contributors of
property interests acquired. Urban Edge serves as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. The third party unitholders
have limited rights over the Operating Partnership such that they do not have characteristics of a controlling financial interest. As
such, the Operating Partnership is considered a variable interest entity (“VIE”), and the Company is the primary beneficiary that
consolidates it. The Company’s only investment is the Operating Partnership. The VIE’s assets can be used for purposes other
than the settlement of the VIE’s obligations and the Company’s partnership interest is considered a majority voting interest.
As of December 31, 2017, our portfolio comprised 85 shopping centers, four malls and a warehouse park totaling approximately
16.7 million square feet.
Operating Strategy. Our operating strategy is to maximize the value of our existing assets through proactive management
encompassing: continuous asset evaluation for highest-and-best-use; efficient and cost-conscious operations that minimize retailer
operating expense and enhance property quality; and targeted leasing to the most desirable tenants. During 2017 we:
•
•
•
•
•
increased same-property cash Net Operating Income (“NOI”)(1) by 4.7% over the year ended December 31, 2016;
increased same-property retail portfolio occupancy(2) to 98.3% from 98.2% as of December 31, 2016;
saw consolidated retail portfolio occupancy(3) decline to 96.0% from 97.2% as of December 31, 2016 owing to our
acquisition of shopping centers with lower occupancies than ours;
signed 37 new leases totaling 346,877 square feet, including 19 new leases on a same-space(4) basis totaling 108,604
square feet at an average rental rate of $21.52 per square foot on a GAAP basis and $19.93 per square foot on a cash
basis, and generating average rent spreads of 13.8% on a GAAP basis and 3.2% on a cash basis; and
renewed or extended 70 leases totaling 1,041,389 square feet, including 70 leases on a same-space basis totaling 1,041,389
square feet at an average rental rate of $15.93 per square foot on a GAAP basis and $15.63 per square foot on a cash
basis and, generating average rent spreads of 9.3% on a GAAP basis and 5.8% on a cash basis.
29
Investment Strategy. Our investment strategy is to selectively deploy capital through redevelopment and development of our
existing assets and through acquisitions in our target markets that are expected to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns. At the
same time, we plan to sell assets that no longer meet our investment criteria. During 2017, we:
•
•
•
•
•
increased the number of active development and redevelopment projects; active projects have a total expected investment
of $195.5 million of which $104.9 million remains to be funded;
completed projects at East Hanover, East Hanover warehouses, Garfield, Hackensack, Rockaway, Turnersville, Walnut
Creek (Mt. Diablo), and Freeport;
identified approximately $115.5 million of additional development and redevelopment projects expected to be completed
over the next several years;
acquired nine retail assets, predominantly in the New York metropolitan area, totaling $464 million, including transaction
costs, with gross leasable area of 2.0 million sf; and
completed the sale of a 32,000 sf, vacant building in Eatontown, NJ for $4.8 million, and completed the sale of excess
land in Kearny, NJ for $0.3 million, both net of selling costs.
Capital Strategy. Our capital strategy is to keep our balance sheet strong, flexible and capable of supporting growth by using cash
flow from operations, refinancing debt when opportunities are favorable, and reinvesting funds from selective asset sales. During
2017, we:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
refinanced our $544 million cross-collateralized mortgage with 18 individual, non-recourse mortgage financings totaling
$710 million;
refinanced our $74 million, 4.59% mortgage loan secured by our Tonnelle Commons property in North Bergen, NJ,
increasing the principal balance to $100 million with a 10-year fixed rate mortgage, at 4.18%;
amended and extended our $500 million unsecured revolving credit agreement. The amendment increased its size to $600
million and extended the maturity date to March 7, 2021 with two six-month extension options;
issued 1.8 million OP units in connection with the acquisition of a ground lease under Yonkers Gateway Center at $27.09
per unit. Additionally, we issued 2.6 million OP units and 1.9 million OP units in connection with the portfolio acquisition
of seven retail assets (the "Portfolio”) at a value of $27.02 per unit;
issued 7.7 million common shares of beneficial interest in an underwritten public offering in May 2017. This offering
generated cash proceeds of $193.5 million, net of $1.3 million of issuance costs;
issued 6.25 million common shares of beneficial interest in August 2017 to a large institutional investor at a net price of
$24.80 per share. There was no underwriter or placement agent and net cash proceeds to the Company were $155 million;
and
ended the year with cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, of $501 million and debt, net of cash, to total
market capitalization of 22.4%.
2018 Outlook. We seek growth in earnings, funds from operations, and cash flows primarily by:
•
•
•
•
leasing vacant spaces, extending expiring leases at higher rents, processing the exercise of tenant options and, when
possible, replacing underperforming tenants with tenants that can pay higher rents;
expediting the delivery of space to and the collection of rents from tenants with executed leases that have not yet
commenced;
creating additional value from our existing assets by redevelopment of existing space, development of new space and
pad sites, and by anchor repositioning; and
disposing of non-core assets and, when possible, reinvesting the proceeds in existing properties and in acquiring additional
properties meeting our investment criteria.
(1)Refer to page 38 for a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measure.
(2)Information provided on a same-property basis includes the results of properties that were owned and operated for the entirety of the reporting periods being
compared and excludes properties that were under development, redevelopment, acquired, sold, or in the foreclosure process during the periods being compared and
totals 74 properties for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
(3)Our retail portfolio includes shopping centers and malls and excludes warehouses.
(4)The “same-space” designation is used to compare leasing terms (cash leasing spreads) from the prior tenant to the new/current tenant. In some cases, leases are
excluded from "same-space" because the gross leasable area of the prior lease is combined/divided to form a larger/smaller, non-comparable space.
30
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
referred to as “GAAP”, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that in certain circumstances affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and revenue and expenses. These estimates are
prepared using management’s best judgment, after considering past and current events and economic conditions. In addition,
certain information relied upon by management in preparing such estimates includes internally generated financial and operating
information, external market information, when available, and when necessary, information obtained from consultations with third
party experts. Actual results could differ from these estimates. A discussion of possible risks which may affect these estimates is
included in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management considers an accounting estimate to be
critical if changes in the estimate could have a material impact on our consolidated and combined results of operations or financial
condition.
Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 3 to the consolidated and combined financial statements
included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K; however, the most critical accounting policies, which involve the
use of estimates and assumptions as to future uncertainties and, therefore, may result in actual amounts that differ from estimates,
are as follows:
Real Estate — The nature of our business as an owner, redeveloper and operator of retail shopping centers means that we invest
significant amounts of capital into our properties. Depreciation, amortization and maintenance costs relating to our properties
constitute substantial costs for us as well as the industry as a whole. Real estate is capitalized and depreciated on a straight-line
basis in accordance with GAAP and consistent with industry standards based on our best estimates of the assets’ physical and
economic useful lives which range from 3 to 40 years. We periodically review the estimated lives of our assets and implement
changes, as necessary, to these estimates. These assessments have a direct impact on our net income. Real estate is carried at cost,
net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations
as they are incurred. Significant renovations that improve or extend the useful lives of assets are capitalized.
Real estate undergoing redevelopment activities is also carried at cost but no depreciation is recognized. All property operating
expenses directly associated with and attributable to the redevelopment, including interest, are capitalized to the extent the
capitalized costs of the property do not exceed the estimated fair value of the property when completed. If the cost of the redeveloped
property, including the net book value of the existing property, exceeds the estimated fair value of redeveloped property, the excess
is charged to impairment expense. The capitalization period begins when redevelopment activities are underway and ends when
the project is substantially complete. Generally, a redevelopment is considered substantially completed and ready for its intended
use upon completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from completion of major construction activity. We make
judgments as to the time period over which to capitalize such costs and these assumptions have a direct impact on net income
because capitalized costs are not subtracted in calculating net income.
Upon the acquisition of real estate, we assess the fair value of acquired assets (including land, buildings and improvements,
identified intangibles, such as acquired above and below-market leases, acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships) and
acquired liabilities. We assess fair value based on estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization
rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including historical
operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions. Based on these estimates, we allocate the purchase price to the
applicable assets and liabilities based on their relative fair values at date of acquisition.
In allocating the purchase price to identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, the value of above-market
and below-market leases is estimated based on the present value of the difference between the contractual amounts, including
fixed rate below-market renewal options, to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and our estimate of the market lease rates and
other lease provisions for comparable leases measured over a period equal to the estimated remaining term of the lease. Tenant
related intangibles and improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the related lease term, including any bargain
renewal options. We amortize identified intangibles that have finite lives over the period they are expected to contribute directly
or indirectly to the future cash flows of the property or business acquired. We consider qualitative and quantitative factors in
evaluating the likelihood of a tenant exercising a below market renewal option and include such renewal options in the calculation
of in-place leases. If the value of below-market lease intangibles includes renewal option periods, we include such renewal periods
in the amortization period utilized. If a lease terminates prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease
are written off.
Our properties are individually reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. An impairment exists when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the aggregate projected future
cash flows over the anticipated holding period on an undiscounted basis. An impairment loss is measured based on the excess of
31
the property’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value. Impairment analyses are based on our current plans, intended holding
periods and available market information at the time the analyses are prepared. If our estimates of the projected future cash flows,
anticipated holding periods, or market conditions change, our evaluation of impairment losses may be different and such differences
could be material to our consolidated and combined financial statements. Plans to hold properties over longer periods decrease
the likelihood of recording impairment losses. The carrying value of a property may also be individually reassessed in the event
a casualty occurs at that property. Casualty events may include property damage from a natural disaster or fire. When such an
event occurs, management estimates the net book value of assets damaged over the property’s total gross leasable area and adjusts
the property’s carrying value to reflect the damages. Estimates are subjective and may change if additional damage is later assessed.
Real Estate Held For Sale — When a real estate asset is identified by management as held for sale, we cease depreciation of the
asset and estimate its fair value, net of estimated costs to sell. If the estimated fair value, net of estimated costs to sell, of an asset
is less than its net carrying value, an adjustment is recorded to reflect the estimated fair value. Properties classified as real estate
held for sale generally represent properties that are under contract for sale and are expected to close within a year.
In evaluating whether a property meets the held for sale criteria, we make a determination as to the point in time that it is probable
that a sale will be consummated. Given the nature of all real estate sales contracts, it is not unusual for such contracts to allow
potential buyers a period of time to evaluate the property prior to formal acceptance of the contract. In addition, certain other
matters critical to the final sale, such as financing arrangements, often remain pending even upon contract acceptance. As a result,
properties under contract may not close within the expected time period or may not close.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts — We make estimates of the collectibility of our current accounts receivable and straight-line
rents receivable which require significant judgment by management. The collectibility of receivables is affected by numerous
factors including current economic conditions, bankruptcies, and the ability of the tenant to perform under the terms of their lease
agreement. While we make estimates of potentially uncollectible amounts and provide an allowance for them through bad debt
expense, actual collectibility could differ from those estimates which could affect our net income.
With respect to the allowance for current uncollectible tenant receivables, we assess the collectibility of outstanding receivables
by evaluating such factors as nature and age of the receivable, credit history and current financial condition of the specific tenant
including our assessment of the tenant’s ability to meet its contractual lease obligations, and the status of any pending disputes or
lease negotiations with the tenant.
The straight-line receivable arises from earnings recognized in excess of amounts currently due under the lease agreements. Due
to the nature of the straight-line receivable, the collection period of these amounts typically extends beyond one year. The extended
collection period for straight-line rents along with our evaluation of tenant credit risk may result in the deferral of a portion of
straight-line rental income until the collection of such income is reasonably assured. These estimates have a direct impact on our
earnings.
Revenue Recognition — We have the following revenue sources and revenue recognition policies:
• Base Rent - income arising from minimum lease payments from tenant leases. These rents are recognized over the non-
cancelable term of the related leases on a straight-line basis which includes the effects of rent steps and rent abatements
under the leases. We commence revenue recognition when the tenant takes possession of the leased space and the leased
space is substantially ready for its intended use. In addition, in circumstances where we provide a lease incentive to
tenants, we recognize the incentive as a reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
We have a limited number of operating leases that contain contingent rental provisions under which fixed rent shall abate,
contingent upon timing and completion of property redevelopment. The Company’s policy is to defer recognition of
contingent rent abatements until the specified target (i.e. completion of redevelopment) that triggers the contingent rent
abatement is achieved.
•
Percentage Rent - income arising from retail tenant leases that is contingent upon tenant sales exceeding defined thresholds.
These rents are recognized only after the contingency has been removed (i.e., when tenant sales thresholds have been
achieved).
• Tenant Expense Reimbursements - revenue arising from tenant leases which provide for the recovery of all or a portion
of the operating expenses, real estate taxes and capital improvements of the respective property. This revenue is accrued
in the same periods as the expenses are incurred.
• Management, Leasing and Other Fees - income arising from contractual agreements with third parties. This revenue is
recognized as the related services are performed under the respective agreements.
32
Share-Based Compensation — We grant stock options, LTIP units, OP units, restricted share awards and performance-based units
to our officers, trustees and employees. Fair value is determined, depending on the type of award, using either the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model or the Monte Carlo method, both of which are intended to estimate the fair value of the awards at the grant
date. In using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, expected volatilities and dividend yields are primarily based on available
implied data and peer group companies’ historical data. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant. Share-based compensation expense is included in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated
and combined statements of income.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 3 to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
for information regarding recent accounting pronouncements that may affect us. Additionally, see Note 8 to the audited consolidated
and combined financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding recent
amendments to the Internal Revenue Code.
Results of Operations
We derive substantially all of our revenue from rents received from tenants under existing leases on each of our properties. This
revenue includes fixed base rents, recoveries of expenses that we have incurred and that we pass through to the individual tenants
and percentage rents that are based on specified percentages of tenants’ revenue, in each case as provided in the respective leases.
Our primary cash expenses consist of our property operating and capital expenses, general and administrative expenses, and interest
and debt expense. Property operating expenses include: real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, management expenses, insurance,
and utilities; general and administrative expenses include payroll, professional fees, information technology, office expenses, and
other administrative expenses; and interest and debt expense is primarily interest on our mortgage debt and amortization of deferred
financing costs on our revolving credit agreement. In addition, we incur substantial non-cash charges for depreciation and
amortization on our properties. We also capitalize certain expenses, such as taxes, interest, and salaries related to properties under
development or redevelopment until the property is ready for its intended use.
Our consolidated and combined results of operations often are not comparable from period to period due to the impact of property
acquisitions, dispositions, developments and redevelopments. The results of operations of any acquired properties are included in
our financial statements as of the date of acquisition.
The following provides an overview of our key non-GAAP measures based on our consolidated results of operations (refer to cash
NOI, same-property cash NOI and Funds From Operations applicable to diluted common shareholders (“FFO”) described later
in this section):
(Amounts in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
Net income
FFO applicable to diluted common shareholders(1)
Cash NOI(2)
Same-property cash NOI(2)
(1) Refer to page 39 for a reconciliation to the nearest generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) measure.
(2) Refer to page 38 for a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measure.
157,762
187,615
233,187
72,938
$
$
96,630
136,493
209,661
179,119
33
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2016
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $72.9 million, compared to net income of $96.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2016. The following table summarizes certain line items from our consolidated statements of income that we believe
are important in understanding our operations and/or those items which significantly changed in the year ended December 31,
2017 as compared to the same period of 2016:
(Amounts in thousands)
Total revenue
Property operating expenses
General and administrative expenses
Depreciation and amortization
Real estate taxes
Casualty and impairment loss
Provision for doubtful accounts
Gain on sale of real estate
Interest and debt expense
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Income tax benefit (expense)
For the year ended December 31,
2017
2016
$ Change
$
407,042
$
325,976
$
50,894
30,413
82,281
59,737
7,382
3,445
202
56,218
35,336
278
45,280
27,438
56,145
51,429
—
1,214
15,618
51,881
—
(804)
81,066
5,614
2,975
26,136
8,308
7,382
2,231
(15,416)
4,337
35,336
1,082
Total revenue increased by $81.1 million to $407.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 from $326.0 million in the year
ended December 31, 2016. The increase is primarily attributable to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
$39.2 million in income from acquired leasehold interest due to the write-off of the unamortized intangible liability related
to the below-market ground lease acquired in connection with the acquisition of the ground lease at Shops at Bruckner;
$32.6 million increase as a result of acquisitions net of dispositions;
$6.3 million increase in tenant expense reimbursements due to an increase in recoverable expenses and revenue from
recoverable capital projects; and
$4.5 million increase in property rentals due to rent commencements, contractual rent increases and an increase in
percentage rental income, net of tenant vacancies primarily at properties undergoing development, partially offset by
$1.3 million decrease in other income due to a decrease in tenant bankruptcy settlement income received during 2017;
and
$0.2 million decrease in management and development fee income.
Property operating expenses increased by $5.6 million to $50.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 from $45.3 million
in the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in common area maintenance expenses
as a result of acquisitions that closed in 2017.
General and administrative expenses increased by $3.0 million to $30.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 from $27.4
million in the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase is primarily attributable to:
•
•
$2.4 million net increase in employment costs including $1.7 million increase in share based compensation expense and
$0.5 million severance expense; and
$0.6 million net increase in legal, other professional fees and costs related to information technology.
Depreciation and amortization increased by $26.1 million to $82.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 from $56.1 million
in the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase is primarily attributable to:
•
•
•
$23.1 million increase as a result of acquisitions net of dispositions that closed in 2017 and 2016; and
$3.4 million increase from development projects and tenant improvements placed into service in 2017 and 2016, partially
offset by
$0.4 million decrease in tenant intangibles due to write-offs from tenants vacating in 2016.
Real estate taxes increased by $8.3 million to $59.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 from $51.4 million in the year
ended December 31, 2016. The increase is primarily attributable to:
•
•
$5.0 million increase as a result of acquisitions net of dispositions that closed in 2017 and 2016; and
$3.3 million increase due to higher assessed values and tax refunds received in 2016.
34
Casualty and impairment losses of $7.4 million were recognized in the year ended December 31, 2017 as a result of the following
events:
•
•
$3.5 million real estate impairment loss on our property in Eatontown, NJ, prior to sale on June 30, 2017; and
$3.9 million casualty loss incurred as a result of Hurricane Maria, consisting of a $2.2 million write-off of the estimated
net book value of the fixed assets damaged by the hurricane, and $1.7 million of hurricane related expenses.
Provision for doubtful accounts increased by $2.2 million to $3.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 from $1.2 million
in the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily due to $1.3 million provision for doubtful accounts recorded for tenants impacted
by Hurricane Maria.
We recognized a gain on the sale of real estate in 2017 of $0.2 million as a result of the sale of excess land at our property in
Kearny, NJ on September 8, 2017. We recognized a gain on the sale of real estate of $15.6 million as a result of the sale of our
property in Waterbury, CT on June 9, 2016.
Interest and debt expense increased by $4.3 million to $56.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 from $51.9 million in
the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase is primarily attributable to:
•
•
•
•
•
$4.5 million increase in interest from loans issued and assumed on acquisitions closed since December 2016;
$3.6 million increase in interest due to 18 new individual, non-recourse mortgage financings totaling $710 million closed
during the fourth quarter of 2017; and
$0.5 million increase in interest due to the mortgage loan refinancing secured by our Tonnelle Commons property in
North Bergen, NJ, partially offset by
$4.1 million net decrease in interest due to principal paydowns and refinancing of the $544 million cross-collateralized
mortgage loan; and
$0.2 million increase of interest capitalized related to additional development projects.
Loss on extinguishment of debt of $35.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 was recognized as a result of the following
events:
•
•
$34.1 million charge related to the early debt extinguishment in connection with the refinancing of our $544 million
cross-collateralized mortgage consisting of a $31.1 million defeasance expense and $3.0 million write-off of unamortized
deferred financing fees; and
$1.3 million charge from the refinancing our mortgage loan secured by our Tonnelle Commons property in North Bergen,
NJ, consisting of a $1.1 million prepayment penalty and $0.2 million of unamortized deferred financing fees on the
original loan.
Income tax expense decreased by $1.1 million resulting in an income tax benefit of $0.3 million in the year ended December 31,
2017 from $0.8 million of expense in the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily due to the impact of the losses from Hurricane
Maria in 2017.
35
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2016 to 2015
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $96.6 million, compared to net income of $41.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2015. The following table summarizes certain line items from our consolidated and combined statements of income
that we believe are important in understanding our operations and/or those items which significantly changed in the year ended
December 31, 2016 as compared to the same period of 2015:
(Amounts in thousands)
Total revenue
Real estate tax expenses
Property operating expenses
General and administrative expenses
Transaction costs
Gain on sale of real estate
Interest and debt expense
Income tax expense
For the year ended December 31,
2016
2015
$ Change
$
325,976
$
322,945
$
51,429
45,280
27,438
1,405
15,618
51,881
804
49,311
50,595
32,044
24,011
—
55,584
1,294
3,031
2,118
(5,315)
(4,606)
(22,606)
15,618
(3,703)
(490)
Total revenue of $326.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $3.0 million from $322.9 million in the year ended
December 31, 2015. The increase is primarily attributable to:
•
•
•
•
•
$4.4 million net increase in property rentals due to rent commencements from higher occupancy, contractual rent increases
and increase in specialty leasing income, offset by tenant vacancies at development projects;
$0.5 million net increase associated with properties acquired and sold in 2016 and 2015;
$0.3 million increase in tenant expense reimbursements due to recoveries derived from the growth in capital improvements
partially offset by a decrease in recoverable expenses;
partially offset by $1.7 million lower tenant bankruptcy settlement income; and
$0.5 million decrease in management and development fee income due to properties under management sold during 2015.
Real estate tax expenses increased by $2.1 million to $51.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 from $49.3 million in
the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase is primarily attributable to:
•
•
•
$2.3 million increase due to higher assessed values and tax refunds received in 2015;
$0.5 million increase due to the acquisition of Cross Bay Commons in December 2015; and
partially offset by $0.7 million of additional real estate taxes capitalized related to space taken out of service for
development and redevelopment projects.
Property operating expenses decreased by $5.3 million to $45.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 from $50.6 million
in the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease is primarily attributable to:
•
•
•
$3.2 million lower common area maintenance expenses;
$1.4 million of environmental remediation costs accrued in 2015; and
$0.7 million decrease in non-recoverable operating expenses including property level litigation costs.
General and administrative expenses decreased by $4.6 million to $27.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 from $32.0
million in the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease is primarily attributable to:
•
•
$7.1 million of share-based compensation expense incurred in 2015 in connection with the one-time issuance of LTIP
units to certain executives in connection with our separation transaction; and
partially offset by $2.5 million of share-based compensation expense incurred in 2016 due to equity awards granted and
the vesting of existing equity awards.
Transaction costs decreased $22.6 million to $1.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 from $24.0 million in the year
ended December 31, 2015. The decrease is primarily due to costs incurred in connection with the separation transaction in 2015.
Gain on sale of real estate assets of $15.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 was recognized as a result of the sale of
our property in Waterbury, CT on June 9, 2016. The sale completed the reverse Section 1031 tax deferred exchange transaction
with the acquisition of Cross Bay Commons.
Interest and debt expense decreased $3.7 million to $51.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 from $55.6 million in the
year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease is primarily attributable to:
•
$1.9 million of additional interest capitalized related to increased levels of development and redevelopment;
36
•
•
$1.1 million of costs expensed in connection with the refinancing of the loan secured by Montehiedra in January 2015;
and
$0.7 million due to a lower mortgage payable balance as a result of scheduled principal payments and debt prepayment
in connection with the sale of our property in Waterbury, CT during the second quarter of 2016.
Income tax expense decreased $0.5 million resulting in income tax expense of $0.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2016
from $1.3 million of expense in the year ended December 31, 2015 as a result of a $0.6 million reduction to the accrued income
tax liability recorded during 2016, partially offset by the current period income tax expense accrual.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Throughout this section, we have provided certain information on a “same-property” cash basis which includes the results of
operations that were owned and operated for the entirety of the reporting periods being compared, totaling 74 properties for the
twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Information provided on a same-property basis excludes properties that were
under development, redevelopment or that involve anchor repositioning where a substantial portion of the gross leasable area is
taken out of service and also excludes properties acquired, sold, under contract to be sold, or that are in the foreclosure process
during the periods being compared. While there is judgment surrounding changes in designations, a property is removed from the
same-property pool when a property is considered to be a redevelopment property because it is undergoing significant renovation
or retenanting pursuant to a formal plan and is expected to have a significant impact on property operating income based on the
retenanting that is occurring. A development or redevelopment property is moved back to the same-property pool once a substantial
portion of the NOI growth expected from the development or redevelopment is reflected in both the current and comparable prior
year period, generally one year after at least 80% of the expected cash NOI from the project is realized. Acquisitions are moved
into the same-property pool once we have owned the property for the entirety of the comparable periods and the property is not
under significant development or redevelopment.
We calculate same-property cash NOI using net income as defined by GAAP reflecting only those income and expense items that
are incurred at the property level, adjusted for the following items: lease termination fees, bankruptcy settlement income, non-
cash rental income and ground rent expense and income or expenses that we do not believe are representative of ongoing operating
results, if any.
The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to cash NOI is net income. Cash NOI excludes certain components from
net income in order to provide results that are more closely related to a property’s results of operations. We calculate cash NOI
by adjusting GAAP operating income to add back depreciation and amortization expense, general and administrative expenses,
casualty and real estate impairment losses and non-cash ground rent expense, and deduct non-cash rental income resulting from
the straight-lining of rents and amortization of acquired below market leases net of above market leases.
We use cash NOI internally to make investment and capital allocation decisions and to compare the unlevered performance of our
properties to our peers. Further, we believe cash NOI is useful to investors as a performance measure because, when compared
across periods, cash NOI reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs and
acquisition and disposition activity on an unleveraged basis, providing perspective not immediately apparent from operating
income or net income. As such, cash NOI assists in eliminating disparities in net income due to the development, redevelopment,
acquisition or disposition of properties during the periods presented, and thus provides a consistent performance measure for the
comparison of the operating performance of the Company’s properties. Cash NOI and same-property cash NOI should not be
considered substitutes for operating income or net income and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by
others.
Same-property cash NOI increased by $8.5 million, or 4.7%, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the
twelve months ended December 31, 2016.
37
The following table reconciles net income to cash NOI and same-property cash NOI for the years ended December 31, 2017 and
2016.
(Amounts in thousands)
Net income
Add: income tax (benefit) expense
Interest income
Gain on sale of real estate
Interest and debt expense
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Management and development fee income from non-owned properties
Other income
Depreciation and amortization
Casualty and impairment loss(6)
General and administrative expense
Transaction costs
Less: non-cash revenue and expenses
Cash NOI(1)
Adjustments:
Non-same property cash NOI(1)(2)
Hurricane related operating loss(4)
Construction settlement due to tenant
Tenant bankruptcy settlement income(3)
Same-property cash NOI
Adjustments:
Cash NOI related to properties being redeveloped(5)
Same-property cash NOI including properties in redevelopment
For the year ended December 31,
2017
2016
$
$
$
$
72,938
(278)
(2,248)
(202)
56,218
35,336
(1,535)
(235)
82,281
7,382
30,413
278
(47,161)
233,187
(46,766)
1,267
902
(975)
187,615
$
25,304
212,919
$
96,630
804
(679)
(15,618)
51,881
—
(1,759)
(121)
56,145
—
27,438
1,405
(6,465)
209,661
(28,164)
—
—
(2,378)
179,119
22,846
201,965
(1) Cash NOI is calculated as total property revenues less property operating expenses, excluding the net effects of non-cash rental income and
non-cash ground rent expense.
(2) Non-same property cash NOI for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes cash NOI related to properties being redeveloped and properties
acquired, disposed, or in foreclosure. Includes $0.9 million of hurricane operating losses at Montehiedra that are subject to reimbursement
from the insurance company.
(3) Tenant bankruptcy settlement income includes lease termination income.
(4) Amounts reflect rental and tenant reimbursement losses as well as provisions against outstanding amounts due from tenants at Las Catalinas
that are subject to reimbursement from the insurance company.
(5) Excludes $0.9 million of rental and tenant reimbursement losses as well as provisions against outstanding amounts due from tenants at
Montehiedra that are subject to reimbursement from the insurance company for the year ended December 31, 2017.
(6) Casualty and impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 include $1.7 million hurricane related expenses, $2.2 million write-off
of net book value of assets damaged and $3.5 million real estate impairment loss incurred in connection with the sale of the Company's
Eatontown property.
38
Funds From Operations
FFO applicable to diluted common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $157.8 million compared to $136.5
million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
We calculate FFO in accordance with the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts’ (‘‘NAREIT’’) definition. NAREIT
defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciated real estate
assets, real estate impairment losses, rental property depreciation and amortization expense. We believe FFO is a meaningful non-
GAAP financial measure useful in comparing our levered operating performance from period to period both internally and among
our peers because this non-GAAP measure excludes net gains on sales of depreciable real estate, real estate impairment losses,
rental property depreciation and amortization expense which implicitly assumes that the value of real estate diminishes predictably
over time rather than fluctuating based on market conditions. FFO does not represent cash flows from operating activities in
accordance with GAAP, should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance, and is not
indicative of cash flow as a measure of liquidity or our ability to make cash distributions. FFO may not be comparable to similarly
titled measures employed by others.
(Amounts in thousands)
Net income
Less (net income) attributable to noncontrolling interests in:
Operating partnership
Consolidated subsidiaries
Net income attributable to common shareholders
Adjustments:
Rental property depreciation and amortization
Real estate impairment loss
Gain on sale of real estate
Limited partnership interests in operating partnership(1)
For the year ended December 31,
2017
2016
$
72,938
$
96,630
(5,824)
(44)
67,070
81,401
3,467
—
5,824
(5,812)
(3)
90,815
55,484
—
(15,618)
5,812
FFO applicable to diluted common shareholders
(1) Represents earnings allocated to LTIP and OP unit holders for unissued common shares which have been excluded for purposes of calculating
earnings per diluted share for the periods presented. FFO applicable to diluted common shareholders calculations includes earnings allocated
to LTIP and OP unit holders. For the year ended December 31, 2017 calculation, the weighted average share total includes the redeemable
shares outstanding as their inclusion is dilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the respective weighted average share totals are
excluded because their inclusion is anti-dilutive.
157,762
136,493
$
$
39
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Due to the nature of our business, we typically generate significant amounts of cash from operations; however, the cash generated
from operations is primarily paid to our shareholders and unitholders of the Operating Partnership in the form of distributions.
Our status as a REIT requires that we distribute 90% of our REIT taxable income each year. Our Board of Trustees declared a
quarterly dividend of $0.22 per common share and OP Unit for each of the four quarters in 2017, or an annual rate of $0.88. We
expect to pay regular cash dividends, however, the timing, declaration, amount and payment of distributions to shareholders and
unitholders of the Operating Partnership falls within the discretion of our Board of Trustees. Our Board of Trustees’ decisions
regarding the payment of dividends depends on many factors, such as maintaining our REIT tax status, our financial condition,
earnings, capital requirements, debt service obligations, limitations under our financing arrangements, industry practice, legal
requirements, regulatory constraints, and other factors.
Property rental income is our primary source of cash flow and is dependent on a number of factors including our occupancy level
and rental rates, as well as our tenants’ ability to pay rent. Our properties provide us with a relatively consistent stream of cash
flow that enables us to pay operating expenses, debt service and recurring capital expenditures. Other sources of liquidity to fund
cash requirements include proceeds from financings, equity offerings and asset sales.
Our short-term liquidity requirements consist of normal recurring operating expenses, lease obligations, regular debt service
requirements, recurring expenditures (general & administrative expenses), expenditures related to leasing activity and distributions
to shareholders and unitholders of the Operating Partnership. Our long-term capital requirements consist primarily of maturities
under our long-term debt agreements, development and redevelopment costs and potential acquisitions.
At December 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, of $501 million and no amounts drawn on
our revolving credit agreement. In addition, the Company has the following sources of capital available:
(Amounts in thousands)
ATM equity program(1)
Original offering amount
Available capacity
Revolving credit agreement(2)
Total commitment amount
Year Ended December 31,
2017
$
$
$
250,000
241,300
600,000
Available capacity
Maturity(3)
(1) Refer to Note 15 to the consolidated and combined financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2) Refer to Note 7 to the consolidated and combined financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(3) On March 7, 2017, we amended and extended our revolving credit agreement. The amendment increased the credit facility size by $100
March 7, 2021
600,000
$
million to $600 million and extended the maturity date to March 7, 2021 with two six-month extension options.
On May 10, 2017, the Company issued 7.7 million common shares of beneficial interest in an underwritten public offering pursuant
to the Company’s effective shelf registration statement previously filed on Form S-3 (File No. 333-212951) with the SEC on
August 5, 2016. This offering generated cash proceeds of $193.5 million, net of $1.3 million of issuance costs.
On August 4, 2017, the Company issued 6.25 million common shares of beneficial interest to a large institutional investor at a net
price of $24.80 per share, pursuant to the Company’s effective shelf registration statement previously filed on Form S-3 (File No.
333-212951) with the SEC on August 5, 2016. The issuance was a direct sale with no underwriter or placement agent such that
net cash proceeds to the Company were $155 million.
On January 4, 2017, we issued 1.8 million OP units in connection with the acquisition of Yonkers Gateway Center at a value of
$27.09 per unit. On May 24 and 25, 2017 we issued 2.6 million OP units and 1.9 million OP units, respectively, in connection
with the Portfolio acquisition at a value of $27.02 per unit.
We have one mortgage loan, secured by our property in Englewood, NJ, scheduled to mature in 2018. As of December 31, 2017,
the outstanding principal balance of this mortgage loan totaled $11.5 million. During 2017, our property in Englewood, NJ was
transferred to a receiver. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the property was sold at a foreclosure sale. Upon issuance of the
court’s order approving the sale and discharging the receiver, all assets and liabilities related to the property will be removed. We
40
have no other debt scheduled to mature until 2021. We currently believe that cash flows from operations over the next 12 months,
together with cash on hand, our ATM equity program, our revolving credit agreement and our general ability to access the capital
markets will be sufficient to finance our operations and fund our debt service requirements and capital expenditures.
Summary of Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents including restricted cash was $500.8 million at December 31, 2017, compared to $140.2 million as of
December 31, 2016, an increase of $360.6 million.
Our cash flow activities are summarized as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)
2017
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
$
157,898
(295,732)
498,489
$
137,249
(59,230)
(115,858)
138,078
(66,415)
93,795
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities primarily consists of cash inflows from tenant rent and tenant expense reimbursements
and cash outflows for property operating expenses, general and administrative expenses and interest and debt expense.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash provided by operating activities of $157.9 million was comprised of $161.3
million of cash from operating income and a net decrease of $3.4 million in cash due to timing of cash receipts and payments
related to changes in operating assets and liabilities.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, net cash provided by operating activities of $137.2 million was comprised of $140.1
million of cash from operating income and $2.9 million net decrease in cash due to timing of cash receipts and payments related
to changes in operating assets and liabilities.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities is impacted by the timing and extent of our real estate development, capital improvements,
and acquisition and disposition activities during the period.
Net cash used in investing activities of $295.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, increased by $236.5 million from
$59.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The activity was comprised of (i) $211.4 million net cash used in acquiring
nine real estate assets during the year, with total gross leasable area of 2.0 million sf, and (ii) $89.3 million net cash used in real
estate development and capital improvements at existing properties, partially offset by (iii) $5.0 million of proceeds from the sale
of our property in Eatontown, NJ and the sale of excess land in Kearny, NJ.
Net cash used in investing activities of $59.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 was comprised of (i) $69.9 million
of real estate additions and (ii) $9.3 million from the acquisition of real estate, partially offset by (iii) $19.9 million of proceeds
from the sale of operating properties.
Financing Activities
Net cash flow provided by financing activities is impacted by the timing and extent of issuances of debt and equity securities,
distributions paid to common shareholders and unitholders of the Operating Partnership as well as principal and other payments
associated with our outstanding indebtedness.
Net cash provided by financing activities of $498.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased by $614.3 million
from net cash used in financing activities of $115.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The activity was comprised
of (i) $935.7 million of proceeds from borrowings attributable to the issuance of 18 non-recourse secured mortgages, refinancing
of our Tonnelle Commons mortgage loan and mortgages assumed and issued to fund acquisitions, (ii) $348.4 million of proceeds
from the issuance of common shares attributable to an underwritten public offering, and a direct sale of common shares with a
large institutional investor, partially offset by (iii) $536.5 million used to purchase marketable securities in connection with debt
defeasance, (iv) $129.6 million for debt repayments, (v) $104.9 million of distributions paid to common shareholders and
unitholders of the Operating Partnership, (vi) $13.2 million of debt issuance costs, (vii) $1.1 million payment on extinguishment
of debt attributable to the refinancing of our Tonnelle Commons mortgage loan, and (viii) $0.3 million of taxes withheld on vested
restricted units.
41
Net cash used in financing activities of $115.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, was comprised of (i) $86.3 million
of distributions paid to common shareholders and unitholders of the Operating Partnership and (ii) $38.5 million for debt
repayments, partially offset by (iii) $8.9 million of proceeds from the issuance of common shares including shares issued under
our ATM equity program.
Financing Activities and Contractual Obligations
Below is a summary of our outstanding debt and weighted average interest rate as of December 31, 2017.
(Amounts in thousands)
Mortgages payable:
Fixed rate debt
Variable rate debt(1)
Principal balance at
December 31, 2017
Weighted Average
Interest Rate at
December 31, 2017
$
1,408,817
169,500
1,578,317
(13,775)
4.14%
3.10%
4.03%
Total mortgages payable
Unamortized debt issuance costs
Total mortgages payable, net of unamortized debt issuance costs $
1,564,542
(1) As of December 31, 2017, $80.5 million of our variable rate debt bears interest at one month LIBOR plus 190 bps and $89 million of our
variable rate debt bears interest at one month LIBOR plus 160 bps.
The net carrying amount of real estate collateralizing the above indebtedness amounted to approximately $1.3 billion as of
December 31, 2017. Our mortgage loans contain covenants that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness on these properties
and in certain circumstances, require lender approval of tenant leases and/or yield maintenance upon repayment prior to maturity.
As of December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all debt covenants.
On January 15, 2015, we entered into a $500 million Revolving Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”) with certain financial
institutions. On March 7, 2017, we amended and extended the Agreement. The amendment increased the credit facility size by
$100 million to $600 million and extended the maturity date to March 7, 2021 with two six-month extension options. Borrowings
under the Agreement are subject to interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 1.10% to 1.55% and an annual facility fee of
15 to 35 basis points. Both the spread over LIBOR and the facility fee are based on our current leverage ratio and are subject to
increase if our leverage ratio increases above predefined thresholds. The Agreement contains customary financial covenants,
including a maximum leverage ratio of 60% and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.5x. No amounts have been drawn
to date under the Agreement.
On March 29, 2017, we refinanced the $74 million, 4.59% mortgage loan secured by our Tonnelle Commons property in North
Bergen, NJ, increasing the principal balance to $100 million with a 10-year fixed rate mortgage, at 4.18%. As a result, we recognized
a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.3 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 comprised of a $1.1 million
prepayment penalty and write-off of $0.2 million of unamortized deferred financing fees on the original loan.
In connection with retail assets acquired during the year ended December 31, 2017, we assumed $69.4 million of existing mortgages,
secured by the acquired properties, including $12.6 million with the acquisition of Shops at Bruckner on January 17, 2017, $23.8
million with the acquisition of Hudson Mall on February 2, 2017, and $33 million with the acquisition of Yonkers Gateway Center
on May 24, 2017. In addition, we obtained $126 million of non-recourse, secured mortgage debt on May 24 and 25, 2017, in
connection with the acquisition of a portfolio of seven retail assets comprising 1.5 million sf of gross leasable area.
During the fourth quarter of 2017, we completed 18 individual, non-recourse mortgage financings totaling $710 million. The new
mortgages have a weighted average interest rate of 4.0% with a weighted average term to maturity of 10 years. The proceeds
received were used to legally defease and prepay the Company’s $544 million mortgage, cross-collateralized by 39 assets and
scheduled to mature in 2020. The cross-collateralized mortgage loan had a weighted average interest rate of 4.2%. As a result of
the refinancing, the Company generated $120 million of additional cash proceeds net of refinancing costs, and recognized a $34.1
million loss on extinguishment of debt in the year ended December 31, 2017.
During 2017, our property in Englewood, NJ was transferred to a receiver. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the property was
sold at a foreclosure sale. Upon issuance of the court’s order approving the sale and discharging the receiver, all assets and liabilities
related to the property will be removed.
42
We have contractual obligations related to our mortgage loans described further in Note 7 to the consolidated and combined
financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, we have contractual obligations
for certain properties that are subject to long-term ground and building leases where a third party owns and has leased the underlying
land to us. Below is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017:
(Amounts in thousands)
Contractual cash obligations
Long-term debt obligations(1)
Operating lease obligations
Commitments Due by Period
Total
Less than 1
year
1 to 3 years
3 to 5 years
More than 5
years
$
$
2,063,703
66,789
2,130,492
$
$
80,585
9,091
89,676
$
$
138,245
15,558
153,803
$
$
341,967
11,521
353,488
$
$
1,502,906
30,619
1,533,525
(1) Includes interest and principal payments. Interest on variable rate debt is computed using rates in effect as of December 31, 2017.
Additional contractual obligations that have been excluded from this table are as follows:
• Obligations related to construction and development contracts, since amounts are not fixed or determinable. Such contracts
will generally be due over the next two years;
• Obligations related to maintenance contracts, since these contracts typically can be canceled upon 30 to 60 days’ notice
without penalty;
• Obligations related to employment contracts with certain executive officers, since all agreements are subject to cancellation
by either the Company or the executive without cause upon notice; and
• Recorded debt premiums or discounts that are not obligations.
Capital Expenditures
The following summarizes capital expenditures presented on a cash basis for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
(Amounts in thousands)
Capital expenditures:
Development and redevelopment costs
Capital improvements
Tenant improvements and allowances
Total capital expenditures
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
$
$
60,477
$
13,181
7,568
81,226
$
51,585
15,180
3,136
69,901
As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $195.5 million of active redevelopment, development and anchor repositioning
projects at various stages of completion and $53.6 million of completed projects, an increase of $57.4 million from $191.7 million
of active and completed projects as of December 31, 2016. We have advanced these projects $56.5 million since December 31,
2016 and anticipate that these projects will require an additional $111.4 million over the next two years to complete. We expect
to fund these projects using cash on hand, proceeds from dispositions, borrowings under our revolving credit agreement and/or
using secured debt, or issuing equity.
Commitments and Contingencies
Loan Commitments
In January 2015, we completed a modification of the $120.0 million, 6.04% mortgage loan secured by Montehiedra. As part of
the planned redevelopment of the property, we committed to fund $20.0 million for leasing and other capital expenditures which
has been fully funded as of December 31, 2017.
Insurance
The Company maintains (i) general liability insurance with limits of $200 million for properties in the U.S. and Puerto Rico and
(ii) all-risk property insurance with limits of $500 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for properties in the U.S. and $139
million for properties in Puerto Rico, subject to the terms, conditions, exclusions, deductibles and sub-limits when applicable for
certain perils such as floods and earthquakes and (iii) numerous other insurance policies including trustees’ and officers’ insurance,
workers’ compensation and automobile-related liabilities insurance. The Company’s insurance includes coverage for certified acts
of terrorism acts but excludes coverage for nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological terrorism events as defined by the Terrorism
43
Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, which expires in December 2020. In addition, the Company maintains coverage for
certain cybersecurity losses with limits of $5 million per occurrence and in the aggregate providing first and third party coverage
including network interruption, event management, cyber extortion and claims for media content, security and privacy liability.
Insurance premiums are typically charged directly to each of the retail properties and warehouses but not all of the cost of such
premiums are recovered. The Company is responsible for deductibles, losses in excess of insurance coverage, and the portion of
premiums not covered from retail properties, which could be material.
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism. However, we
cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future and expect premiums across
most property coverage lines to increase in light of recent events. The incurrence of uninsured losses, costs or uncovered premiums
could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Hurricane-Related Charges
On September 20, 2017, Hurricane Maria made landfall, damaging our two properties in Puerto Rico. All anchor tenants were
open for business within weeks after the hurricane other than Marshalls at Montehiedra, which is being reconstructed. At year-
end, approximately 86% of all stores previously occupied prior to the hurricane (as measured by GLA) are open.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company has incurred approximately $5.1 million of costs remediating property damages caused
by the hurricane, $3.4 million capitalized within Construction in progress on the consolidated balance sheet and $1.7 million of
costs expensed within Casualty and impairment loss on the consolidated statement of income. The Company expects insurance
proceeds to cover substantially all of these losses subject to applicable deductibles of approximately $2.3 million.
The Company recognized $2.2 million of business interruption losses, net of $1.8 million in cash advances received from its
insurance carrier. Losses of $0.9 million pertained to rent abatements when the malls were closed or inoperable as a result of the
hurricane, recorded as a reduction of property rentals and tenant expense reimbursements, and $1.3 million was recorded as a
provision for doubtful accounts for unpaid rents. The Company expects to recover a significant portion of these losses from
insurance in 2018.
In the third quarter of 2017, the Company also recognized a $2.2 million charge reflecting the net book value of assets damaged
as a result of the hurricane included within Casualty and impairment loss on the consolidated statement of income.
The Company has comprehensive, all-risk property insurance coverage on its properties in Puerto Rico, including for business
interruption, with a $139 million limit of liability, subject to certain conditions, exclusions, deductibles and sub-limits.
To the extent insurance proceeds ultimately exceed the difference between replacement cost and net book value of the damaged
assets, the hurricane related expenses incurred, and/or business interruption losses recognized, the excess will be reflected as
income in the period those amounts are received or when receipt is deemed probable.
No determination has been made as to the total amount or timing of insurance payments that may be received as a result of the
hurricane.
Environmental Matters
Each of our properties has been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment at various times. Based on these
assessments and the projected remediation costs, we have accrued costs of $1.2 million and $1.3 million on our consolidated
balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, for potential remediation costs for environmental
contamination at two properties. While this accrual reflects our best estimates of the potential costs of remediation at these properties,
$0.1 million has currently been expended during the year ended December 31, 2017 and there can be no assurance that the actual
costs will not exceed this amount. With respect to our other properties, the environmental assessments did not reveal any material
environmental contamination. However, there can be no assurance that the identification of new areas of contamination, changes
in the extent or known scope of contamination, the discovery of additional sites, or changes in cleanup requirements would not
result in significant costs to us.
Bankruptcies
Although our base rent is supported by long-term leases, leases may be rejected in a bankruptcy proceeding and the impacted
stores may close prior to lease expiration. In the event that a tenant with a significant number of leases in our shopping centers
files for bankruptcy and rejects its leases with us, we could experience a reduction in our revenues. We monitor the operating
performance and rent collections of all tenants in our shopping centers, especially those tenants in arrears or operating retail formats
that are experiencing significant changes in competition, business practice, or store closings in other locations, such as Toys “R”
Us, Sears Holding Corporation (“Sears”) and Staples, Inc. (“Staples”). Sears and Staples represent 2.0% and 1.5%, respectively,
of our annualized base rent and each continued to close stores in 2017. During September 2017, Toys “R” Us filed a voluntary
petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had leases with Toys
44
“R” Us at nine locations with annualized base rent of $5.0 million. We are unable to estimate the outcome of the bankruptcy
proceedings at this time. We are not aware of any additional bankruptcies or announced store closings by any tenants in our
shopping centers that would individually cause a material reduction in our revenues.
Inflation and Economic Condition Considerations
Most of our leases contain provisions designed to partially mitigate the impact of inflation. Although inflation has been low in
recent periods and has had a minimal impact on the performance of our shopping centers, there are more recent data suggesting
that inflation may be a greater concern in the future given economic conditions and governmental fiscal policy. Most of our leases
require tenants to pay their share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance,
thereby reducing our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation, although some larger tenants
have capped the amount of these operating expenses they are responsible for under the lease. A small number of our leases also
include percentage rent clauses enabling us to receive additional rent based on tenant sales above a predetermined level, which
sales generally increase as prices rise and are typically related to increases in the Consumer Price Index or similar inflation indices.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303 of Regulation S-K as of December 31, 2017 or
December 31, 2016.
45
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
We have exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, which are sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control. The following
table discusses our exposure to hypothetical changes in market rates of interest on interest expense for our variable rate debt and
fixed-rate debt. Interest rate risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our debt.
This analysis does not take into account all of the factors that may affect our debt, such as the effect that a changing interest rate
environment could have on the overall level of economic activity or the action that our management might take to reduce our
exposure to the change. This analysis assumes no change in our financial structure. Our exposure to a change in interest rates is
summarized in the table below. As of December 31, 2017, all of our variable rate debt outstanding had rates indexed to LIBOR.
(Amounts in thousands)
Variable Rate
Fixed Rate
December 31,
Balance
$
$
169,500
1,408,817
1,578,317 (1)
2017
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
3.10%
4.14%
2016
Effect of 1%
Change in
Base Rates
December 31,
Balance
$
$
1,695
— (2)
1,695
$
$
38,756
1,166,804
1,205,560 (1)
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
2.36%
4.26%
(1) Excludes unamortized debt issuance costs of $13.8 million and $8.0 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
(2) If the weighted average interest rate of our fixed rate debt increased by 1% (i.e. due to refinancing at higher rates), interest expense would
have increased by approximately $14.1 million based on outstanding balances as of December 31, 2017.
We may utilize various financial instruments to mitigate the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our cash flows and earnings,
including hedging strategies, depending on our analysis of the interest rate environment and the costs and risks of such strategies.
As of December 31, 2017, we did not have any hedging instruments in place.
Fair Value of Debt
The estimated fair value of our consolidated debt is calculated based on current market prices and discounted cash flows at the
current rate at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings for the remaining term of such debt. As
of December 31, 2017, the estimated fair value of our consolidated debt was $1.6 billion.
46
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Urban Edge Properties
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Urban Edge Properties LP
Urban Edge Properties Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
Urban Edge Properties Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2017,
2016 and 2015
Urban Edge Properties Consolidated and Combined Statement of Changes in Equity for the years ended December
31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Urban Edge Properties Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31,
2017, 2016 and 2015
Urban Edge Properties LP Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
Urban Edge Properties LP Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income for the years ended December 31,
2017, 2016 and 2015
Urban Edge Properties LP Consolidated and Combined Statement of Changes in Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Urban Edge Properties LP Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31,
2017, 2016 and 2015
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements
Page
48
49
50
51
52
53
55
56
57
58
60
47
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Shareholders and Board of Trustees
Urban Edge Properties
New York, New York
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Urban Edge Properties (the "Company") as of December 31,
2017 and 2016, the related consolidated and combined statements of income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 and the related notes and schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively
referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the criteria established in Internal Control
- Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report
dated February 14, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm
registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error
or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
February 14, 2018
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2014.
48
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Partners of
Urban Edge Properties LP
New York, New York
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Urban Edge Properties LP (the "Operating Partnership") as of
December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated and combined statements of income, changes in equity, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 and the related notes and schedules listed in the Index at Item 15
(collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Operating Partnership's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated February 14, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Operating Partnership 's internal
control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Operating Partnership 's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public
accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error
or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
February 14, 2018
We have served as the Operating Partnership's auditor since 2016.
49
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
ASSETS
Real estate, at cost:
Land
Buildings and improvements
Construction in progress
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
Total
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
Real estate, net
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Tenant and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,937 and $2,332,
respectively
Receivable arising from the straight-lining of rents, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$494 and $261, respectively
Identified intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $33,827 and $22,361, respectively
Deferred leasing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $14,796 and $13,909, respectively
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $1,740 and $726, respectively
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Mortgages payable, net
Identified intangible liabilities, net of accumulated amortization of $65,832 and $72,528,
respectively
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ equity:
Common shares: $0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized and 113,827,529 and
99,754,900 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated deficit
Noncontrolling interests:
Operating partnership
Consolidated subsidiaries
Total equity
Total liabilities and equity
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
December 31,
December 31,
2017
2016
$
521,669
2,010,527
133,761
5,897
2,671,854
(587,127)
2,084,727
490,279
10,562
20,078
$
384,217
1,650,054
99,236
4,993
2,138,500
(541,077)
1,597,423
131,654
8,532
9,340
85,843
87,695
87,249
30,875
20,268
3,243
18,559
$ 2,820,808
19,241
1,936
17,442
$ 1,904,138
$ 1,564,542
180,959
$ 1,197,513
146,991
69,595
15,171
1,830,267
48,842
14,675
1,408,021
1,138
997
946,402
(57,621)
488,375
(29,066)
100,218
35,451
404
990,541
$ 2,820,808
360
496,117
$ 1,904,138
50
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
REVENUE
Property rentals
Tenant expense reimbursements
Management and development fees
Income from acquired leasehold interest
Other income
Total revenue
EXPENSES
Depreciation and amortization
Real estate taxes
Property operating
General and administrative
Casualty and impairment loss
Ground rent
Transaction costs
Provision for doubtful accounts
Total expenses
Operating income
Gain on sale of real estate
Interest income
Interest and debt expense
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Income before income taxes
Income tax benefit (expense)
Net income
Less (net income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
in:
Operating partnership
Consolidated subsidiaries
Net income attributable to common shareholders
Earnings per common share - Basic:
Earnings per common share - Diluted:
Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic
Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
265,984
99,098
1,535
39,215
1,210
407,042
82,281
59,737
50,894
30,413
7,382
10,848
278
3,445
245,278
161,764
202
2,248
(56,218)
(35,336)
72,660
278
72,938
(5,824)
(44)
67,070
0.62
0.61
107,132
118,390
$
236,798
84,921
1,759
—
2,498
325,976
56,145
51,429
45,280
27,438
—
10,047
1,405
1,214
192,958
133,018
15,618
679
(51,881)
—
97,434
(804)
96,630
(5,812)
(3)
90,815
0.91
0.91
99,364
99,794
$
$
$
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
231,867
84,617
2,261
—
4,200
322,945
57,253
49,311
50,595
32,044
—
10,129
24,011
1,526
224,869
98,076
—
150
(55,584)
—
42,642
(1,294)
41,348
(2,547)
(16)
38,785
0.39
0.39
99,252
99,278
51
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Common Shares
Noncontrolling Interests
(“NCI”)
Shares
Amount
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Vornado
Equity
Accumulated
Earnings
(Deficit)
Operating
Partnership
Consolidated
Subsidiaries
Total
Equity
— $
— $
— $258,522
$
— $
— $
341
$ 258,863
Balance, January 1, 2015
Net income (loss)
attributable to common
shareholders(1)
Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests
Limited partnership units
issued to Vornado at
separation
Contributions from
Vornado
Issuance of shares in
connection with separation
Common shares issued
Dividends on common
shares ($0.80 per share)
Share-based compensation
expense
Distributions to operating
partnership ($0.80 per
unit)
Balance, December 31,
2015
Net income attributable to
common shareholders
Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests
Common shares issued
Share-based awards
retained for taxes
Dividends on common
shares ($0.82 per share)
Share-based compensation
expense
Distributions to operating
partnership ($0.82 per
unit)
Balance, December 31,
2016
Net income attributable to
common shareholders
Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests
Limited partnership units
issued
Common shares issued
Share-based awards
withheld for taxes
Dividends on common
shares ($0.88 per share)
Share-based compensation
expense
Distributions to operating
partnership ($0.88 per
unit)
Balance, December 31,
2017
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(2,022)
40,807
—
—
—
— (27,649)
— 245,067
—
—
—
—
(258)
(79,167)
—
2,547
27,649
—
—
—
—
—
16
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
357
—
3
—
—
—
—
—
38,785
2,563
—
245,067
—
—
(79,167)
10,261
(4,918)
471,454
90,815
5,815
8,949
(38)
(81,240)
5,433
(5,071)
176
7,899
—
(4,918)
(38,442)
33,177
90,815
—
(348)
—
(81,240)
149
—
—
5,812
—
—
—
1,533
(5,071)
(29,066)
35,451
360
496,117
67,070
—
—
—
(319)
—
(95,381)
75
—
5,824
65,884
—
—
—
2,530
(9,471)
—
44
—
—
—
—
—
—
67,070
5,868
171,084
348,404
(287)
(95,381)
7,137
(9,471)
99,247,806
993
472,925
(473,918)
43,146
—
—
—
99,290,952
—
—
465,534
(1,586)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
993
—
—
4
—
—
—
—
258
—
2,186
—
475,369
—
—
9,293
(38)
—
3,751
—
99,754,900
997
488,375
—
—
—
14,083,137
(10,508)
—
—
—
—
141
—
—
—
105,200
348,582
(287)
—
4,532
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
113,827,529
$ 1,138
$ 946,402
$
— $
(57,621) $
100,218
$
404
$ 990,541
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
52
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
72,938
$
96,630
$
41,348
Depreciation and amortization
Income from acquired leasehold interest
Casualty and impairment loss
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Amortization of deferred financing costs
Amortization of above and below market leases, net
Straight-lining of rent
Share-based compensation expense
Gain on sale of real estate
Non-cash separation costs paid by Vornado
Provision for doubtful accounts
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Tenant and other receivables
Deferred leasing costs
Prepaid and other assets
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Other liabilities
Net cash provided by operating activities
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Real estate development and capital improvements
Acquisition of real estate
Proceeds from sale of real estate
Net cash used in investing activities
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Debt repayments
Contributions from Vornado
Dividends paid to shareholders
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in operating partnership
Debt issuance costs
Taxes withheld for vested restricted shares
Payment on extinguishment of debt
Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net
Purchase of marketable securities in connection with debt defeasance
Proceeds from borrowings
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year
$
82,511
(39,215)
5,637
35,336
2,876
(9,502)
352
7,137
(202)
—
3,445
(13,749)
(4,110)
(4,432)
18,594
282
157,898
(89,344)
(211,393)
5,005
(295,732)
(129,640)
—
(95,381)
(9,471)
(13,193)
(287)
(1,138)
348,404
(536,505)
935,700
498,489
360,655
140,186
500,841
$
57,178
—
—
—
2,830
(7,776)
227
5,433
(15,618)
—
1,214
(78)
(3,815)
141
(237)
1,120
137,249
(69,901)
(9,267)
19,938
(59,230)
(38,458)
—
(81,240)
(5,071)
—
(38)
—
8,949
—
—
(115,858)
(37,839)
178,025
140,186
$
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
58,299
—
—
—
2,738
(7,907)
333
10,261
—
17,403
1,526
(4)
(2,940)
(671)
11,300
6,392
138,078
(36,290)
(30,125)
—
(66,415)
(44,654)
227,732
(79,167)
(4,918)
(5,198)
—
—
—
—
—
93,795
165,458
12,567
178,025
53
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash payment for interest, includes amounts capitalized of $3,926, $3,763 and
$1,856, respectively
Cash payments for income taxes
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of real estate through issuance of OP units
Acquisition of real estate through assumption of debt
Accrued capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued expenses
Write-off of fully depreciated assets
Marketable securities transferred in connection with debt defeasance
Defeasance of mortgages payable
RECONCILIATION OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND
RESTRICTED CASH
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Restricted cash at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
Restricted cash at end of year
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
55,140
$
51,137
$
52,814
1,237
1,277
1,907
171,084
69,659
14,651
3,286
536,590
(505,473)
—
—
12,492
4,585
—
—
$
$
$
$
131,654
8,532
140,186
490,279
10,562
500,841
$
$
$
$
168,983
9,042
178,025
131,654
8,532
140,186
$
$
$
$
—
—
8,699
10,588
—
—
2,600
9,967
12,567
168,983
9,042
178,025
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
54
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except unit and per unit amounts)
ASSETS
Real estate, at cost:
Land
Buildings and improvements
Construction in progress
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
Total
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
Real estate, net
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Tenant and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,937 and $2,332,
respectively
Receivable arising from the straight-lining of rents, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$494 and $261, respectively
Identified intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $33,827 and $22,361, respectively
Deferred leasing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $14,796 and $13,909, respectively
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $1,740 and $726, respectively
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Mortgages payable, net
Identified intangible liabilities, net of accumulated amortization of $65,832 and $72,528,
respectively
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Partners’ capital:
General partner:113,827,529 and 99,754,900 units outstanding, respectively
Limited partners:12,812,954 and 6,378,704 units outstanding, respectively
Accumulated deficit
Total partners’ capital
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries
Total equity
Total liabilities and equity
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
December 31,
December 31,
2017
2016
$
521,669
2,010,527
133,761
5,897
2,671,854
(587,127)
2,084,727
490,279
10,562
20,078
$
384,217
1,650,054
99,236
4,993
2,138,500
(541,077)
1,597,423
131,654
8,532
9,340
85,843
87,695
87,249
30,875
20,268
3,243
18,559
$ 2,820,808
19,241
1,936
17,442
$ 1,904,138
$ 1,564,542
180,959
$ 1,197,513
146,991
69,595
15,171
1,830,267
48,842
14,675
1,408,021
947,540
105,495
(62,898)
990,137
489,372
37,081
(30,696)
495,757
404
990,541
$ 2,820,808
360
496,117
$ 1,904,138
55
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except unit and per unit amounts)
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
REVENUE
Property rentals
Tenant expense reimbursements
Management and development fees
Income from acquired leasehold interest
Other income
Total revenue
EXPENSES
Depreciation and amortization
Real estate taxes
Property operating
General and administrative
Casualty and impairment loss
Ground rent
Transaction costs
Provision for doubtful accounts
Total expenses
Operating income
Gain on sale of real estate
Interest income
Interest and debt expense
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Income before income taxes
Income tax benefit (expense)
Net income
Less: (net income) loss attributable to NCI in consolidated
subsidiaries
Net income attributable to unitholders
Earnings per unit - Basic:
Earnings per unit - Diluted:
Weighted average units outstanding - Basic
Weighted average units outstanding - Diluted
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
265,984
99,098
1,535
39,215
1,210
407,042
82,281
59,737
50,894
30,413
7,382
10,848
278
3,445
245,278
161,764
202
2,248
(56,218)
(35,336)
72,660
278
72,938
(44)
72,894
0.62
0.61
117,779
118,390
$
$
$
$
236,798
84,921
1,759
—
2,498
325,976
56,145
51,429
45,280
27,438
—
10,047
1,405
1,214
192,958
133,018
15,618
679
(51,881)
—
97,434
(804)
96,630
(3)
96,627
0.91
0.91
105,455
106,099
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
231,867
84,617
2,261
—
4,200
322,945
57,253
49,311
50,595
32,044
—
10,129
24,011
1,526
224,869
98,076
—
150
(55,584)
—
42,642
(1,294)
41,348
(16)
41,332
0.39
0.39
105,276
105,374
56
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except unit and per unit amounts)
General
Partner
Limited
Partners(1)
Vornado
Equity
Accumulated
Earnings
(Deficit)
NCI in
Consolidated
Subsidiaries
Total
Equity
$
— $
— $
258,522
$
— $
341
$
258,863
Balance, January 1, 2015
Net income (loss) attributable to unitholders(2)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests
Contributions from Vornado
(2,022)
43,354
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
245,067
Issuance of units in connection with separation
473,918
27,649
(501,567)
Common units issued as a result of common
shares issued by Urban Edge
Distributions to partners ($0.80 per unit)
Share-based compensation expense
Balance, December 31, 2015
Net income attributable to unitholders
Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests
Common units issued as a result of common
shares issued by Urban Edge
Distributions to partners ($0.82 per unit)
Share-based compensation expense
Share-based awards retained for taxes
Balance, December 31, 2016
Net income attributable to unitholders
Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests
Common units issued as a result of common
shares issued by Urban Edge
258
—
2,186
476,362
—
—
9,297
—
3,751
(38)
489,372
—
—
348,723
—
—
7,899
35,548
—
—
—
—
1,533
—
37,081
—
—
—
Limited partnership units issued
105,200
65,884
Distributions to partners ($0.88 per unit)
Share-based compensation expense
Share-based awards withheld for taxes
—
4,532
(287)
—
2,530
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(258)
(84,085)
176
(40,813)
96,627
—
(348)
(86,311)
149
—
(30,696)
72,894
—
(319)
—
(104,852)
75
—
—
16
—
—
—
—
—
357
—
3
—
—
—
—
360
—
44
—
—
—
—
—
41,332
16
245,067
—
—
(84,085)
10,261
471,454
96,627
3
8,949
(86,311)
5,433
(38)
496,117
72,894
44
348,404
171,084
(104,852)
7,137
(287)
Balance, December 31, 2017
990,541
(1) Limited partners have a 10.1% common limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2017 in the form of units of interest in
(62,898) $
$ 947,540
105,495
— $
404
$
$
$
the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”) and Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) units.
(2)
Net loss earned from January 1, 2015 through January 15, 2015 is attributable to Vornado as it was the sole unitholder prior to January 15, 2015. Refer to
Note 1 - Organization.
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
57
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
72,938
$
96,630
$
41,348
Depreciation and amortization
Income from acquired leasehold interest
Casualty and impairment loss
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Amortization of deferred financing costs
Amortization of above and below market leases, net
Straight-lining of rent
Share-based compensation expense
Gain on sale of real estate
Non-cash separation costs paid by Vornado
Provision for doubtful accounts
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Tenant and other receivables
Deferred leasing costs
Prepaid and other assets
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Other liabilities
Net cash provided by operating activities
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Real estate development and capital improvements
Acquisition of real estate
Proceeds from sale of real estate
Net cash used in investing activities
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Debt repayments
Contributions from Vornado
Distributions to partners
Debt issuance costs
Taxes withheld for vested restricted units
Payment on extinguishment of debt
Proceeds from issuance of units, net
Purchase of marketable securities in connection with debt defeasance
Proceeds from borrowings
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year
$
82,511
(39,215)
5,637
35,336
2,876
(9,502)
352
7,137
(202)
—
3,445
(13,749)
(4,110)
(4,432)
18,594
282
157,898
(89,344)
(211,393)
5,005
(295,732)
(129,640)
—
(104,852)
(13,193)
(287)
(1,138)
348,404
(536,505)
935,700
498,489
360,655
140,186
500,841
$
57,178
—
—
—
2,830
(7,776)
227
5,433
(15,618)
—
1,214
(78)
(3,815)
141
(237)
1,120
137,249
(69,901)
(9,267)
19,938
(59,230)
(38,458)
—
(86,311)
—
(38)
—
8,949
—
—
(115,858)
(37,839)
178,025
140,186
$
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
58,299
—
—
—
2,738
(7,907)
333
10,261
—
17,403
1,526
(4)
(2,940)
(671)
11,300
6,392
138,078
(36,290)
(30,125)
—
(66,415)
(44,654)
227,732
(84,085)
(5,198)
—
—
—
—
—
93,795
165,458
12,567
178,025
58
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash payment for interest, includes amounts capitalized of $3,926, $3,763 and
$1,856, respectively
Cash payments for income taxes
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of real estate through issuance of OP units
Acquisition of real estate through assumption of debt
Accrued capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued expenses
Write-off of fully depreciated assets
Marketable securities transferred in connection with debt defeasance
Defeasance of mortgages payable
RECONCILIATION OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND
RESTRICTED CASH
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Restricted cash at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
Restricted cash at end of year
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
55,140
$
51,137
$
52,814
1,237
1,277
1,907
171,084
69,659
14,651
3,286
536,590
(505,473)
—
—
12,492
4,585
—
—
$
$
$
$
131,654
8,532
140,186
490,279
10,562
500,841
$
$
$
$
168,983
9,042
178,025
131,654
8,532
140,186
$
$
$
$
—
—
8,699
10,588
—
—
2,600
9,967
12,567
168,983
9,042
178,025
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
59
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES AND URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
ORGANIZATION
Urban Edge Properties (“UE”, “Urban Edge”, or the “Company”) (NYSE: UE) is a Maryland real estate investment trust focused
on managing, developing, redeveloping, and acquiring retail real estate in urban communities, primarily in the New York
metropolitan area. Urban Edge Properties LP (“UELP” or the “Operating Partnership”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed
to serve as UE’s majority-owned partnership subsidiary and to own, through affiliates, all of our real estate properties and other
assets. UE and UELP were created in 2014 to own the majority of Vornado Realty Trust’s (“Vornado”) (NYSE: VNO) former
shopping center business (the “UE Business”), and separated from Vornado in January 2015. Unless the context otherwise requires,
“we”, “us” and “our” refer to UE after giving effect to the transfer of the UE Business from Vornado, and for periods prior to such
transfer, refer to the UE Business while owned by Vornado.
The Operating Partnership’s capital includes general and common limited partnership interests in the operating partnership (“OP
Units”). As of December 31, 2017, Urban Edge owned approximately 89.9% of the outstanding common OP Units with the
remaining limited OP Units held by Vornado Realty L.P., members of management, our Board of Trustees and contributors of
property interests acquired. Urban Edge serves as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. The third party unitholders
have limited rights over the Operating Partnership such that they do not have characteristics of a controlling financial interest. As
such, the Operating Partnership is considered a variable interest entity (“VIE”), and the Company is the primary beneficiary which
consolidates it. The Company’s only investment is the Operating Partnership. The VIE’s assets can be used for purposes other
than the settlement of the VIE’s obligations and the Company’s partnership interest is considered a majority voting interest.
As of December 31, 2017, our portfolio comprised 85 shopping centers, four malls and a warehouse park totaling approximately
16.7 million square feet.
2.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The accompanying consolidated and combined financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for annual financial information and with the instructions of Form
10-K. The consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 reflect the consolidation of the
Company, the Operating Partnership, wholly-owned subsidiaries and those entities in which we have a controlling financial interest.
The consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 include the consolidated accounts of the
Company and the Operating Partnership. The results presented for the year ended December 31, 2015 reflect the operations and
changes in cash flows on a carved-out and combined basis for the period from January 1, 2015 through the date of separation and
on a consolidated basis subsequent to the date of separation. The financial statements reflect the common shares as of the date of
the separation as outstanding for all periods prior to the separation. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation and combination.
Our primary business is the ownership, management, redevelopment, development and operation of retail shopping centers and
malls. We do not distinguish our primary business or group our operations on a geographical basis for purposes of measuring
performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker reviews operating and financial information for each property on
an individual basis, and therefore, each property represents an individual operating segment. None of our tenants accounted for
more than 10% of our revenue or property operating income. We aggregate all of our properties into one reportable segment due
to their similarities with regard to the nature and economics of the properties, tenants and operations, as well as long-term average
financial performance.
3.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Real Estate — Real estate is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Expenditures for ordinary
maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as they are incurred. Significant renovations that improve or extend the useful
lives of assets are capitalized. As real estate is undergoing redevelopment activities, all property operating expenses directly
associated with and attributable to the redevelopment, including interest, are capitalized to the extent the capitalized costs of the
60
property do not exceed the estimated fair value of the property when completed. If the cost of the redeveloped property, including
the net book value of the existing property, exceeds the estimated fair value of redeveloped property, the excess is charged to
impairment expense. The capitalization period begins when redevelopment activities are underway and ends when the project is
substantially complete. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives which range from 3 to 40
years.
Upon the acquisition of real estate, we assess the fair value of acquired assets (including land, buildings and improvements,
identified intangibles, such as acquired above and below-market leases, acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships) and
acquired liabilities and we allocate the purchase price based on these assessments on a relative fair value basis. We assess fair
value based on estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market
information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including historical operating results, known trends,
and market/economic conditions. We record acquired intangible assets (including acquired above-market leases, acquired in-place
leases and tenant relationships) and acquired intangible liabilities (including below-market leases) at their estimated fair value.
We amortize identified intangibles that have finite lives over the period they are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to
the future cash flows of the property or business acquired.
Our properties are individually reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. An impairment exists when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the aggregate projected future
cash flows over the anticipated holding period on an undiscounted basis. An impairment loss is measured based on the excess of
the property’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value. Impairment analyses are based on our current plans, intended holding
periods and available market information at the time the analyses are prepared. If our estimates of the projected future cash flows,
anticipated holding periods, or market conditions change, our evaluation of impairment losses may be different and such differences
could be material to our consolidated and combined financial statements. Plans to hold properties over longer periods decrease
the likelihood of recording impairment losses.
Real Estate Held For Sale — When a real estate asset is identified by management as held for sale, we cease depreciation of the
asset and estimate its fair value, net of estimated costs to sell. If the estimated fair value, net of estimated costs to sell, of an asset
is less than its net carrying value, an adjustment is recorded to reflect the estimated fair value. Properties classified as real estate
held for sale generally represent properties that are under contract for sale and are expected to close within a year.
Cash and Cash Equivalents — Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three
months or less and are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to their short-term maturities. The majority of our cash
and cash equivalents consists of (i) deposits at major commercial banks, which may at times exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation limit, (ii) United States Treasury Bills, and (iii) Certificate of Deposits placed through an Account Registry Service
(“CDARS”). To date we have not experienced any losses on our invested cash.
Restricted Cash — Restricted cash consists of security deposits and cash escrowed under loan agreements for debt service, real
estate taxes, property insurance, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and capital expenditures.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts — Accounts receivable includes unpaid amounts billed to tenants
and accrued revenues for future billings to tenants for property expenses. We periodically evaluate the collectibility of amounts
due from tenants and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of tenants to
make required payments under the lease agreements. We also maintain an allowance for receivables arising from the straight-
lining of rents. These receivables arise from earnings recognized in excess of amounts currently due under the lease agreements.
Management exercises judgment in establishing these allowances and considers payment history and current credit status in
developing these estimates. Accounts receivable are written-off when they are deemed to be uncollectible and we are no longer
actively pursuing collection.
Deferred Leasing Costs — Deferred leasing costs include direct salaries, third-party fees and other costs incurred by us to originate
a lease. Such costs are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related leases.
Deferred Financing Costs — Deferred financing costs include fees associated with our revolving credit agreement. Such fees are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related revolving credit agreement as a component of interest expense,
which approximates the effective interest rate method, in accordance with the terms of the agreement. No amounts have been
drawn to date under the revolving credit agreement.
61
Revenue Recognition — We have the following revenue sources and revenue recognition policies:
• Base Rent - income arising from minimum lease payments from tenant leases. These rents are recognized over the non-
cancelable term of the related leases on a straight-line basis which includes the effects of rent steps and rent abatements
under the leases. We commence revenue recognition when the tenant takes possession of the leased space and the leased
space is substantially ready for its intended use. In addition, in circumstances where we provide a lease incentive to
tenants, we recognize the incentive as a reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
•
Percentage Rent - income arising from retail tenant leases that is contingent upon tenant sales exceeding defined thresholds.
These rents are recognized only after the contingency has been removed (i.e., when tenant sales thresholds have been
achieved).
• Tenant Expense Reimbursements - revenue arising from tenant leases which provide for the recovery of all or a portion
of the operating expenses, real estate taxes and capital improvements of the respective property. This revenue is accrued
in the same periods as the expenses are incurred.
• Management, Leasing and Other Fees - income arising from contractual agreements with third parties. This revenue is
recognized as the related services are performed under the respective agreements.
Noncontrolling Interests — Noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries represent the portion of equity that we do not
own in those entities that we consolidate. We identify our noncontrolling interests separately within the equity section on the
consolidated balance sheets. Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership include OP units and limited partnership interests
in the Operating Partnership in the form of long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) unit awards.
Variable Interest Entities - Certain entities that do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without
additional subordinated financial support from other parties or in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a
controlling financial interest qualify as VIEs. VIEs are required to be consolidated by their primary beneficiary. The primary
beneficiary of a VIE has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact economic performance of the VIE
and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The consolidated
and combined financial statements reflect the consolidation of VIEs in which the Company is the primary beneficiary.
Earnings Per Share and Unit — Basic earnings per common share and unit is computed by dividing net income attributable to
common shareholders and unitholders by the weighted average common shares and units outstanding during the period. Unvested
share-based payment awards that entitle holders to receive non-forfeitable dividends, such as our restricted stock awards, are
classified as “participating securities.” Because the awards are considered participating securities, the Company and the Operating
Partnership are required to apply the two-class method of computing basic and diluted earnings that would otherwise have been
available to common shareholders and unitholders. Under the two-class method, earnings for the period are allocated between
common shareholders and unitholders and other shareholders and unitholders, based on their respective rights to receive dividends.
During periods of net loss, losses are allocated only to the extent the participating securities are required to absorb their share of
such losses. Diluted earnings per common share and unit reflects the potential dilution of the assumed exercises of shares including
stock options and unvested restricted shares to the extent they are dilutive.
Share-Based Compensation — We grant stock options, LTIP units, OP units, restricted share awards and performance-based units
to our officers, trustees and employees. The term of each award is determined by the compensation committee of our Board of
Trustees (the “Compensation Committee”), but in no event can such term be longer than ten years from the date of grant. The
vesting schedule of each award is determined by the Compensation Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, at the date of
grant of the award. Dividends are paid on certain shares of unvested restricted stock, which makes the restricted stock a participating
security.
Fair value is determined, depending on the type of award, using either the Black-Scholes option-pricing model or the Monte Carlo
method, both of which are intended to estimate the fair value of the awards at the grant date. In using the Black-Scholes option-
pricing model, expected volatilities and dividend yields are primarily based on available implied data and peer group companies’
historical data. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
Compensation expense for restricted share awards is based on the fair value of our common shares at the date of the grant and is
recognized ratably over the vesting period. For grants with a graded vesting schedule or a cliff vesting schedule, we have elected
to recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis. Also included in Share-based compensation expense is the unrecognized
compensation expense of awards issued under Vornado’s outperformance plan (“OPP”) prior to the separation for the Company’s
employees who were previously Vornado employees. The OPP unrecognized compensation expense is recognized on a straight-
62
line basis over the remaining life of the OPP awards issued. Share-based compensation expense is included in general and
administrative expenses on the consolidated and combined statements of income.
When the Company issues common shares as compensation, it receives a like number of common units from the Operating
Partnership. Accordingly, the Company’s ownership in the Operating Partnership will increase based on the number of common
shares awarded under our 2015 Omnibus Share Plan. As a result of the issuance of common units to the Company for share-based
compensation, the Operating Partnership accounts for share-based compensation in the same manner as the Company.
Income Taxes — Our two Puerto Rico malls are subject to income taxes which are based on estimated taxable income and are
included in income tax expense in the consolidated and combined statements of income. Income taxes are accounted for under
the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which these temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of dividends to shareholders, differs from
net income reported for financial reporting purposes primarily because of differences in depreciable lives and cost bases of the
malls, as well as other timing differences.
Concentration of Credit Risk — A concentration of credit risk arises in our business when a national or regionally-based tenant
occupies a substantial amount of space in multiple properties owned by us. In that event, if the tenant suffers a significant downturn
in its business, it may become unable to make its contractual rent payments to us, exposing us to potential losses in rental revenue,
expense recoveries, and percentage rent. Further, the impact may be magnified if the tenant is renting space in multiple locations.
Generally, we do not obtain security from our national or regionally-based tenants in support of their lease obligations to us. We
regularly monitor our tenant base to assess potential concentrations of credit risk. None of our tenants accounted for more than
10% of total revenues in the year ended December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, The Home Depot was our largest tenant
with 7 stores which comprised an aggregate of 920,000 square-feet and accounted for approximately $22.3 million, or 5.5% of
our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Recently Issued Accounting Literature
In May 2017, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2017-09”) Scope of Modification Accounting, which clarifies when to account
for a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award as a modification. Under the new guidance, modification
accounting will not apply if the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification of the awards are the same immediately before
and after the modification. ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption
permitted. We adopted the standard on January 1, 2018, which resulted in no impact. If we encounter a change to the terms or
conditions of any of our share-based payment awards we will evaluate the need to apply modification accounting based on the
new guidance. The general treatment for modifications of share-based payment awards is to record the incremental value arising
from the change as additional compensation cost.
In February 2017, the FASB issued an updated (“ASU 2017-05”) Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of
Nonfinancial Assets, to clarify the scope and accounting for derecognition of nonfinancial assets. ASU 2017-05 eliminated the
guidance specific to real estate sales and partial sales. ASU 2017-05 defines “in-substance nonfinancial assets” and includes
guidance on partial sales of nonfinancial assets. ASU 2017-05 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We adopted the standard on January 1, 2018, which resulted
in no impact.
In January 2017, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2017-01”) Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which changes the definition
of a business to exclude acquisitions where substantially all of the fair value of the assets acquired are concentrated in a single
identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. While there are various differences between accounting for an asset
acquisition and a business combination, the largest impact is that transaction costs are capitalized for asset acquisitions rather than
expensed when they are considered business combinations. ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December
15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt ASU 2017-01 effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of this
standard has resulted in asset acquisition classification for the real estate acquisitions closed in the year ended December 31, 2017,
and accordingly, acquisition costs for these acquisitions have been capitalized (refer to Note 4 Acquisitions and Dispositions).
In February 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-02”) Leases, which revises the accounting related to lease accounting.
Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases with terms
greater than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense
recognition in the income statement. The provisions of ASU 2016-02 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2018 and should be applied through a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the
beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted. We expect to adopt
63
the standard beginning January 1, 2019. This standard will impact our consolidated financial statements by the recording of right-
of-use assets and lease liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets for operating and finance leases where we are the lessee. We
are currently in the process of evaluating the inputs required to calculate the amount that will be recorded on our consolidated
balance sheets for these leases. In addition, leases where we are the lessor that meet the criteria of a finance lease will be amortized
using the effective interest method with corresponding charges to interest expense and amortization expense. Leases where we
are the lessor that meet the criteria of an operating lease will continue to be amortized on a straight-line basis. Further, internal
leasing department costs previously capitalized will be expensed within general and administrative expenses. Historical
capitalization of internal leasing costs was $0.7 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December
31, 2016. ASU 2016-02 originally stated that companies would be required to bifurcate certain lease revenues between lease and
non-lease components, however, the FASB issued an exposure draft in January 2018 (2018 Exposure Draft) which, if adopted as
written, would allow lessors a practical expedient by class of underlying assets to account for lease and non-lease components as
a single lease component if certain criteria are met. ASU 2016-02 originally required a modified retrospective method of adoption,
however, the 2018 Exposure Draft indicates that companies may be permitted to recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the
opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact of this guidance
until it becomes effective.
In May 2014, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2014-09”) Revenue from Contracts with Customers to ASC Topic 606, which
supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. ASU 2014-09 requires additional
disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including
significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the FASB issued the following updates to ASC Topic 606 to clarify and/or amend the guidance
in ASU 2014-09: (i) ASU 2016-08 Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), which clarifies
the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations, (ii) ASU 2016-10 Identifying Performance Obligations and
Licensing, which clarifies guidance related to identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation guidance and
(iii) ASU 2016-12 Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, which amends certain aspects of ASU 2014-09. In
August 2015, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2015-09”) Revenue from Contracts with Customers to ASC Topic 606, which
defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for all entities by one year. ASU 2015-09 is effective beginning after December 15, 2017,
including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2018 using the
modified retrospective approach which requires applying the new standard to all existing contracts not yet completed as of the
effective date. We have completed our evaluation of the standard’s impact on the Company’s revenue streams, specifically
management and development fee income. We expect the new standard to primarily impact qualitative disclosures rather than
materially affecting our revenue recognition accounting policies and will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Any other recently issued accounting standards or pronouncements not disclosed above have been excluded as they are not relevant
to the Company or the Operating Partnership, or they are not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
64
4.
ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
During the year ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we closed on the following acquisitions:
Date Purchased
Property Name
City
State
Square Feet
Purchase Price(1)
(in thousands)
January 4, 2017
Yonkers Gateway Center
January 17, 2017
Shops at Bruckner
February 2, 2017
Hudson Mall
Yonkers Gateway Center
The Plaza at Cherry Hill
Manchester Plaza
May 24, 2017
May 24, 2017
May 24, 2017
May 24, 2017
May 24, 2017
May 25, 2017
Millburn Gateway Center
Millburn
21 E Broad St / One Lincoln Plaza Westfield
The Plaza at Woodbridge
Woodbridge
NJ
NJ
NJ
Yonkers
Bronx
Jersey City
Yonkers
Cherry Hill
NY
NY
NJ
NY
NJ
Manchester
MO
December 22, 2016
North Bergen - outparcel
North Bergen NJ
— (2) $
114,000
383,000
437,000 (2)
413,000
131,000
102,000
22,000
411,000
2017 Total $
0.3 (3) $
2016 Total $
51,902
32,269
44,273
101,825
53,535
20,162
45,583
10,158
103,962
463,669
2,667
2,667
Includes $11.3 million of transaction costs incurred since January 1, 2017.
(1)
(2) On January 4, 2017, we acquired fee and leasehold interests, including the lessor position under an operating lease for the whole property.
On May 24, 2017, we purchased the remaining fee and leasehold interests not previously acquired, including the lessee position under the
operating lease for the whole property.
In acres.
(3)
On January 4, 2017, we acquired fee and leasehold interests in Yonkers Gateway Center for $51.9 million. Consideration for this
purchase consisted of the issuance of $48.8 million in OP units and $2.9 million of cash. The total number of OP units issued was
1.8 million at a value of $27.09 per unit. Transaction costs associated with this acquisition were $0.2 million.
On January 17, 2017, we acquired the leasehold interest in the Shops at Bruckner for $32.3 million, consisting of the assumption
of the existing debt of $12.6 million and $19.4 million of cash. The property is a 114,000 sf retail center in the Bronx, NY directly
across from our 376,000 sf Bruckner Commons shopping center. We own the land under the Shops at Bruckner and had been
leasing it to the seller under a ground lease that ran through September 2044. Concurrent with the acquisition, we wrote-off the
unamortized intangible liability balance related to the below-market ground lease as well as the existing straight-line receivable
balance. As a result, we recognized $39.2 million of income from acquired leasehold interest in the year ended December 31,
2017. Transaction costs associated with this acquisition were $0.3 million.
On February 2, 2017, we acquired Hudson Mall, a 383,000 sf retail center in Jersey City, NJ adjacent to our existing Hudson
Commons shopping center. Consideration for this purchase consisted of the assumption of the existing debt of $23.8 million and
$19.9 million of cash. Transaction costs associated with this acquisition were $0.6 million.
On May 24 and 25, 2017, we acquired the Portfolio comprising 1.5 million sf of gross leasable area, predominantly in the New
York City metropolitan area, for $325 million excluding transaction costs. The Portfolio was privately owned for more than three
decades and was 83% leased as of the date of acquisition. Consideration for this purchase consisted of the issuance of $122 million
in OP units, the assumption of $33 million of existing mortgage debt, the issuance of $126 million of non-recourse, secured
mortgage debt and $44 million of cash. The total number of OP units issued was 4.5 million at a value of $27.02 per unit. Transaction
costs associated with this acquisition were $10.2 million.
All acquisitions closed during the year ended December 31, 2017 were accounted for as asset acquisitions in accordance with
ASU 2017-01, adopted January 1, 2017. Accordingly, transaction costs incurred since January 1, 2017 related to these transactions
were capitalized as part of the asset’s purchase price. The purchase prices for all acquisitions were allocated to the acquired assets
and liabilities based on their relative fair values at date of acquisition.
65
$
$
$
The aggregate purchase price of the above property acquisitions have been allocated as follows:
Property Name
(in thousands)
Land
Buildings and
improvements
Identified
intangible
assets(1)
Identified
intangible
liabilities(1)
Debt
premium
Total
purchase
price
Yonkers Gateway Center
$
40,699
$
— $
25,858
$
Shops at Bruckner
Hudson Mall
Yonkers Gateway Center
The Plaza at Cherry Hill
Manchester Plaza
Millburn Gateway Center
21 E Broad St / One Lincoln
Plaza
The Plaza at Woodbridge
—
15,824
22,642
14,602
4,409
15,783
5,728
21,547
2017 Total $ 141,234
32,979
37,593
110,635
33,666
13,756
25,387
4,305
75,017
12,029
9,930
38,162
7,800
3,256
5,360
679
11,596
333,338
$
114,670
$
(14,655) $
(12,709)
(17,344)
(68,694)
(2,533)
(1,259)
(947)
(554)
— $
(30)
(1,730)
(920)
—
—
—
—
51,902
32,269
44,273
101,825
53,535
20,162
45,583
10,158
(4,198)
(122,893) $
—
(2,680) $
103,962
463,669
North Bergen - outparcel
2016 Total
$
$
2,667
2,667
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
2,667
2,667
(1) As of December 31, 2017, the remaining weighted average amortization periods of the identified intangible assets and identified intangible
liabilities acquired in 2017 were 17.9 years and 16.6 years, respectively.
Dispositions
On June 30, 2017, we completed the sale of our property previously classified as held for sale in Eatontown, NJ, for $4.8 million,
net of selling costs. Prior to the sale, the book value of this property exceeded its estimated fair value less costs to sell, and as
such, an impairment charge of $3.5 million was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2017. Our determination of fair value
was based on the executed contract of sale with the third-party buyer.
On September 8, 2017, we completed the sale of excess land in Kearny, NJ for $0.3 million, resulting in a gain of $0.2 million.
On June 9, 2016, we completed the sale of a shopping center located in Waterbury, CT for $21.6 million, resulting in a gain of
$15.6 million.
Real Estate Held for Sale
At December 31, 2017, we had one property classified as held for sale in Allentown, PA based on the executed contract of sale
with a third-party buyer and our intent to dispose of the property. The carrying amount of our property in Allentown, PA is $3.3
million, net of accumulated depreciation of $14.3 million, which is included in prepaid expenses and other assets in our consolidated
balance sheets as of December 31, 2017. We expect to complete the sale of Allentown during 2018.
5.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In connection with the separation, the Company and Vornado entered into a transition services agreement under which Vornado
provided transition services to the Company including human resources, information technology, risk management, tax services
and office space and support. The fees charged to us by Vornado for those transition services approximated the actual cost incurred
by Vornado in providing such services. On June 28, 2016, the Company executed an amendment to the transition services agreement,
extending Vornado’s provision of information technology, risk management services and the portion of the human resources service
related to health and benefits through July 31, 2018, unless terminated earlier. Fees for these services remain the same except that
they may be adjusted for inflation. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no amounts due to Vornado
related to such services.
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 there were $1.6 million, $1.7 million, and $2.4 million respectively,
of costs paid to Vornado included in general and administrative expenses, which consisted of $1.0 million, $0.9 million, and $0.4
66
million of rent expense for two of our office locations and $0.6 million, $0.8 million, and, $2.0 million of transition services fees,
respectively.
Management and Development Fees
In connection with the separation, the Company and Vornado entered into property management agreements under which the
Company provides management, development, leasing and other services to certain properties owned by Vornado and its affiliates,
including Interstate Properties (“Interstate”) and Alexander’s, Inc. (NYSE:ALX). Interstate is a general partnership that owns
retail properties in which Steven Roth, Chairman of Vornado’s Board and Chief Executive Officer of Vornado, and a member of
our Board of Trustees, is the managing general partner. Interstate and its partners beneficially owned an aggregate of approximately
7.2% of the common shares of beneficial interest of Vornado as of December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, Vornado owned
32.4% of Alexander’s, Inc. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 we recognized management and
development fee income of $1.5 million, $1.8 million, and $2.3 million respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31,
2016, there were $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of fees due from Vornado included in tenant and other receivables
in our consolidated balance sheets.
6.
IDENTIFIED INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The following table summarizes our identified intangible assets and liabilities:
(Amounts in thousands)
In-place leases
Accumulated amortization
Below-market ground leases(1)
Accumulated amortization
Above-market leases
Accumulated amortization
Other intangible assets
Accumulated amortization
Identified intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
Below-market leases
Accumulated amortization
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
$
88,355
(21,557)
23,730
(10,819)
7,356
(1,228)
1,635
(223)
87,249
246,791
(65,832)
180,959
$
$
29,065
(12,244)
23,730
(9,847)
441
(270)
—
—
30,875
219,519
(72,528)
146,991
Identified intangible liabilities, net of accumulated amortization
(1) Intangible assets related to below-market leases where the Company is a lessee under a ground lease.
$
Amortization of acquired below-market leases, net of acquired above-market leases resulted in additional rental income of $9.5
million, $7.8 million, and $7.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Amortization of acquired in-place leases and customer relationships resulted in additional depreciation and amortization expense
of $9.3 million, $2.0 million, and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Certain shopping centers are subject to ground leases or ground and building leases. Amortization of these acquired below-market
leases resulted in additional rent expense of $1.0 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The following table sets forth the estimated annual amortization expense related to intangible assets and liabilities for the five
succeeding years commencing January 1, 2018:
(Amounts in thousands)
Below-Market
Above-Market
In-Place Leases
Below-Market Ground
Year
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Operating Lease Income Operating Lease Expense
Expense
Leases Expense
$
12,074
$
1,574
$
11,317
$
11,620
11,453
11,251
10,802
1,294
1,016
803
426
8,620
7,349
6,033
4,240
972
972
972
622
590
67
7.
MORTGAGES PAYABLE
The following is a summary of mortgages payable as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Maturity
Interest Rate at
December 31, 2017
December 31,
2017
December 31,
2016
(Amounts in thousands)
First mortgages secured by:
Variable rate
Plaza at Cherry Hill(8)
Westfield - One Lincoln Plaza(8)
Plaza at Woodbridge(8)
Hudson Commons(10)
Watchung(10)
Bronx (1750-1780 Gun Hill Road)(10)
Cross-collateralized loan (variable)(1)
Total variable rate debt
Fixed rate
Englewood(3)
Montehiedra Town Center, Senior Loan(2)
Montehiedra Town Center, Junior Loan(2)
Bergen Town Center
Shops at Bruckner(6)
Hudson Mall(7)
Yonkers Gateway Center(9)
Las Catalinas
Brick
North Plainfield
Middletown
Rockaway
East Hanover (200 - 240 Route 10 West)
North Bergen (Tonnelle Ave)(5)
Manchester Plaza
Millburn
Totowa
Woodbridge Commons
East Brunswick
East Rutherford
Hackensack
East Hanover Warehouses
Marlton
Union (2445 Springfield Ave)
Freeport (437 East Sunrise Highway)
Garfield
Mt Kisco -Target(4)
Cross-collateralized loan (fixed)(1)
Total fixed rate debt
5/24/2022
5/24/2022
5/25/2022
11/15/2024
11/15/2024
12/1/2024
—
10/1/2018
7/6/2021
7/6/2021
4/8/2023
5/1/2023
12/1/2023
4/6/2024
8/6/2024
12/10/2024
12/10/2025
12/1/2026
12/1/2026
12/10/2026
4/1/2027
6/1/2027
6/1/2027
12/1/2027
12/1/2027
12/6/2027
1/6/2028
3/1/2028
12/1/2028
12/1/2028
12/10/2028
12/10/2029
12/1/2030
11/15/2034
—
2.96%
2.96%
2.96%
3.26%
3.26%
3.26%
—%
6.22%
5.33%
3.00%
3.56%
3.90%
5.07%
4.16%
4.43%
3.87%
3.99%
3.78%
3.78%
4.03%
4.18%
4.32%
3.97%
4.33%
4.36%
4.38%
4.49%
4.36%
4.09%
3.86%
4.01%
4.07%
4.14%
6.40%
—%
$
$
28,930
4,730
55,340
29,000
27,000
24,500
—
169,500
11,537
86,236
30,000
300,000
12,162
25,004
33,227
130,000
50,000
25,100
31,400
27,800
63,000
100,000
12,500
24,000
50,800
22,100
63,000
23,000
66,400
40,700
37,400
45,600
43,100
40,300
14,451
—
1,408,817
1,578,317
(13,775)
1,564,542
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
38,756
38,756
11,537
87,308
30,000
300,000
—
—
—
130,000
—
—
—
—
—
73,951
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
14,883
519,125
1,166,804
1,205,560
(8,047)
1,197,513
Total mortgages payable, net of unamortized debt issuance costs $
Total mortgages payable
Unamortized debt issuance costs
(1) The cross-collateralized mortgage loan was defeased and prepaid on November 15, 2017.
(2) As part of the planned redevelopment of Montehiedra Town Center, we committed to fund $20.0 million for leasing and capital expenditures
which has been fully funded as of December 31, 2017.
68
(3) During 2017, our property in Englewood, NJ was transferred to a receiver. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the property was sold at a
foreclosure sale. Upon issuance of the court’s order approving the sale and discharging the receiver, all assets and liabilities related to the
property will be removed. The consolidated balance sheet included total assets and liabilities of $12.4 million and $14.8 million, respectively
as of December 31, 2017.
(4) The mortgage payable balance on the loan secured by Mount Kisco (Target) includes $1.0 million and $1.1 million of unamortized debt
discount as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The effective interest rate including amortization of the debt
discount is 7.37% as of December 31, 2017.
(5) On March 29, 2017, we refinanced the $74 million, 4.59% mortgage loan secured by our Tonnelle Commons property in North Bergen,
NJ, increasing the principal balance to $100 million with a 10-year fixed rate mortgage, at 4.18%. As a result, we recognized a loss on
extinguishment of debt of $1.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 comprised of a $1.1 million prepayment penalty and
write-off of $0.2 million of unamortized deferred financing fees on the original loan.
(6) On January 17, 2017, we assumed the existing mortgage secured by the Shops at Bruckner in connection with our acquisition of the property’s
leasehold interest.
(7) On February 2, 2017, we assumed the existing mortgage secured by Hudson Mall in connection with our acquisition of the property. The
mortgage payable balance on the loan secured by Hudson Mall includes $1.5 million of unamortized debt premium as of December 31,
2017. The effective interest rate including amortization of the debt premium is 3.51% as of December 31, 2017.
(8) Bears interest at one month LIBOR plus 160 bps.
(9) Reflects the $33 million existing mortgage assumed in connection with the acquisition of Yonkers Gateway Center on May 24, 2017. The
mortgage payable balance on the loan secured by Yonkers Gateway Center includes $0.8 million of unamortized debt premium as of
December 31, 2017. The effective interest rate including amortization of the debt premium is 2.28% as of December 31, 2017.
(10) Bears interest at one month LIBOR plus 190 bps.
The net carrying amount of real estate collateralizing the above indebtedness amounted to approximately $1.3 billion as of
December 31, 2017. Our mortgage loans contain covenants that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness on these properties
and in certain circumstances require lender approval of tenant leases and/or yield maintenance upon repayment prior to maturity.
As of December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all debt covenants.
As of December 31, 2017, the principal repayments for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)
Year Ending December 31,
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
$
14,787
4,244
7,571
124,590
100,899
1,326,226
On January 15, 2015, we entered into a $500 million Revolving Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”) with certain financial
institutions. On March 7, 2017, we amended and extended the Agreement. The amendment increased the credit facility size by
$100 million to $600 million and extended the maturity date to March 7, 2021 with two six-month extension options. Borrowings
under the Agreement are subject to interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 1.10% to 1.55% and an annual facility fee of
15 to 35 basis points which is expensed within interest and debt expense as incurred. Both the spread over LIBOR and the facility
fee are based on our current leverage ratio and are subject to increase if our leverage ratio increases above predefined thresholds.
The Agreement contains customary financial covenants including a maximum leverage ratio of 60% and a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio of 1.5x. No amounts have been drawn to date under the Agreement. Financing fees associated with the Agreement
of $3.2 million and $1.9 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, are included in deferred financing
fees in the consolidated balance sheets.
During the fourth quarter of 2017, we completed 18 individual, non-recourse mortgage financings totaling $710 million. The new
mortgages have a weighted average interest rate of 4.0% with a weighted average term to maturity of 10 years. The proceeds
received were used to legally defease and prepay the Company’s $544 million mortgage, cross-collateralized by 39 assets and
scheduled to mature in 2020. The cross-collateralized mortgage loan had a weighted average interest rate of 4.2%. The cash outlay
required for the defeasance of approximately $536.5 million was based on the purchase price of U.S. government securities that
will generate sufficient cash flows to fund the remaining payment obligations under the loan from the effective date of the defeasance
through the maturity date in 2020. In connection with the defeasance, the mortgage and other liens on the property were extinguished,
and all existing collateral was released. As a result of the refinancing, the Company generated $120 million of additional cash
proceeds net of refinancing costs, and recognized a $34.1 million loss on extinguishment of debt in the year ended December 31,
2017. Financing fees associated with the new loans of $9.3 million are included in deferred financing fees in the consolidated
69
balance sheet as of December 31, 2017. The remaining weighted average amortization period of these deferred financing fees is
9.4 years as of December 31, 2017.
8.
INCOME TAXES
The Company has elected to qualify as a REIT under sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
commencing with the filing of our tax return for the 2015 fiscal year for the tax year ended December 31, 2015. Under those
sections, a REIT that distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income as a dividend to its shareholders each year and which
meets certain other conditions will not be taxed on that portion of its taxable income which is distributed to its shareholders. As
a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income taxes, provided that we distribute 100% of taxable income. It is our
intention to adhere to the organizational and operational requirements to maintain our REIT status. If we fail to qualify as a REIT
for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any alternative minimum tax,
which, for corporations, was repealed for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 by the TCJA) and may not be able to
qualify as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act") was signed into law. The Act amends the Internal Revenue Code
to reduce tax rates and modify policies, credits, and deductions for individuals and businesses. Effective January 1, 2018, for
businesses, the Act reduces the corporate tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% rate. Since UE has elected to qualify as
a REIT under sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code with intent to distribute 100% of its taxable income and did not have
any activities in a Taxable REIT Subsidiary (“TRS”) prior to January 1, 2018, there is no impact to the Company’s financial
statements.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company elected, for tax purposes, to treat the wholly-owned limited partnership that holds its
Allentown property as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). A TRS is a corporation, other than a REIT, in which we directly or
indirectly hold stock, which has made a joint election with us to be treated as a TRS under Section 856(l) of the Code. A TRS is
required to pay regular U.S. federal income tax, and state and local income tax where applicable, as a non-REIT “C” corporation.
As a result, all future taxable income recognized by the TRS, including capital gains on the sale of the property held in the TRS,
will be subject to a corporate level tax.
The Allentown legal entity restructuring resulted in a capital gain recognized for tax purposes in 2017. Consequently, the Company
has determined that $0.37 of the $0.88 dividends distributed to shareholders in 2017 represented long-term capital gains. The
Company’s 2018 consolidated financial statements will reflect the TRS’ federal and state corporate income taxes associated with
the operating activities at its Allentown property until the expected sale date in the first quarter.
The following summarizes the tax status of dividends paid for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Dividend paid per share
$
0.88
$
0.82
$
Ordinary income
Return of capital
Capital gains
58%
—%
42%
100%
—%
—%
0.80
100%
—%
—%
The REIT and the other minority members are partners in the Operating Partnership. As such, the partners are required to report
their share of taxable income on their tax returns. We are also subject to certain other taxes, including state and local taxes and
franchise taxes which are included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated and combined statements of income.
Our two Puerto Rico malls are subject to a 29% non-resident withholding tax which is included in income tax benefit (expense)
in the consolidated and combined statements of income. The Puerto Rico tax benefit recorded was $0.3 million for the years ended
December 31, 2017. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, $0.8 million and $1.3 million of Puerto Rico tax expense
was recognized, respectively. Both properties are held in a special partnership for Puerto Rico tax reporting (the general partner
being a qualified REIT subsidiary or “QRS”).
70
Income tax (benefit) expense consists of the following:
(Amounts in thousands)
Income tax expense:
Current(1)
Deferred
Total income tax (benefit) expense
2017
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
$
$
$
696
(974)
(278) $
609
195
804
$
$
1,417
(123)
1,294
(1) Current income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 is net of a $0.6 million reduction to the accrued income tax liability recorded
in the second quarter of 2016.
A net deferred tax liability of $2.8 million is included in our consolidated balance sheet within Other liabilities as of December 31,
2017, comprised of temporary differences related to our two Puerto Rico properties, a deferred tax liability of $4.2 million offset
by a deferred tax asset of $1.4 million. The deferred tax liability of $4.2 million is comprised of $2.2 million of tax depreciation
in excess of GAAP depreciation, $1.7 million straight-line rents and $0.3 million of amortization of acquired leases not recorded
for tax purposes. The deferred tax asset of $1.4 million is comprised of $0.5 million of insurance receivables recorded for tax
purposes, $0.2 million of amortization of deferred financing fees not recorded for tax purposes and $0.7 million excess of bad
debt expense for tax purposes.
The temporary differences resulting from activity during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 is recorded within
Income tax expense on the consolidated and combined statements of income.
Below is a table summarizing the net deferred income tax liability balance as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
(Amounts in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2016
Change in deferred tax assets:
Depreciation
Amortization of deferred financing costs
Provision for doubtful accounts
Change in deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation
Straight-line rent
Amortization of acquired leases
Balance at December 31, 2016
Change in deferred tax assets:
Depreciation
Amortization of deferred financing costs
Provision for doubtful accounts
Insurance claims receivable
Change in deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation
Straight-line rent
Amortization of acquired leases
Balance at December 31, 2017
$
(3,607)
(94)
(46)
(14)
(88)
39
8
(3,802)
(312)
(46)
514
501
102
207
8
(2,828)
$
The Operating Partnership is organized as limited partnership and is generally not subject to federal income tax. Accordingly, no
provision for federal income taxes has been reflected in the accompanying consolidated and combined financial statements. The
Operating Partnership, however, is subject to the non-resident withholding tax at our two Puerto Rico malls.
71
9.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. The
objective of fair value is to determine the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels: Level 1 - quoted prices (unadjusted)
in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities; Level 2 - observable prices based on inputs
not quoted in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and Level 3 - unobservable inputs used when little or no market
data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In
determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as consider counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value.
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring or Non-Recurring Basis
There were no financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2017
and December 31, 2016.
Financial Assets and Liabilities not Measured at Fair Value
Financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets include cash and cash equivalents
and mortgages payable. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. The fair value of mortgages
payable is calculated by discounting the future contractual cash flows of these instruments using current risk-adjusted rates available
to borrowers with similar credit ratings, which are provided by a third-party specialist. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents
is classified as Level 1 and the fair value of mortgages payable is classified as Level 2. The table below summarizes the carrying
amounts and fair value of these financial instruments as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
(Amounts in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Liabilities:
Mortgages payable(1)
As of December 31, 2017
As of December 31, 2016
Carrying Amount
Fair Value
Carrying Amount
Fair Value
$
$
490,279
1,578,317
$
$
490,279
1,579,839
$
$
131,654
1,205,560
$
$
131,654
1,216,989
(1) Carrying amounts exclude unamortized debt issuance costs of $13.8 million and $8.0 million as of December 31, 2017 and December
31, 2016, respectively.
The following market spreads were used by the Company to estimate the fair value of mortgages payable:
Mortgages payable
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
Low
1.7%
High
2.1%
Low
2.0%
High
2.3%
72
10.
LEASES
As Lessor
We lease space to tenants under operating leases which expire from 2018 to 2072. The leases provide for the payment of fixed
base rents payable monthly in advance as well as reimbursements of real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. Retail
leases may also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rents based on a percentage of their sales.
Future base rental revenue under these non-cancelable operating leases excluding extension options is as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)
Year Ending December 31,
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
$
262,499
245,240
216,284
195,905
173,528
1,015,389
These future minimum amounts do not include additional rents based on a percentage of tenants’ sales or reimbursements. For
the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, these additional rents were $1.2 million, $0.8 million, and $1.2 million,
respectively.
As Lessee
We are a tenant under long-term ground leases or ground and building leases for certain of our properties. Lease expirations
range from 2018 to 2102. Future lease payments under these agreements, excluding extension options, are as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)
Year Ending December 31,
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
$
9,091
8,901
6,657
6,092
5,429
30,619
11.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
There are various legal actions against us in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel,
the outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Loan Commitments: In January 2015, we completed the modification of the $120.0 million, 6.04% mortgage loan secured by
Montehiedra Town Center. As part of the planned redevelopment of the property, we committed to fund $20.0 million for leasing
and building capital expenditures which has been fully funded as of December 31, 2017.
Redevelopment: As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $195.5 million of active development, redevelopment and
anchor repositioning projects underway of which $104.9 million remains to be funded. Based on current plans and estimates we
anticipate the remaining amounts will be expended over the next two years.
Insurance
The Company maintains (i) general liability insurance with limits of $200 million for properties in the U.S. and Puerto Rico and
(ii) all-risk property insurance with limits of $500 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for properties in the U.S. and $139
million for properties in Puerto Rico, subject to the terms, conditions, exclusions, deductibles and sub-limits when applicable for
certain perils such as floods and earthquakes and (iii) numerous other insurance policies including trustees’ and officers’ insurance,
workers’ compensation and automobile-related liabilities insurance. The Company’s insurance includes coverage for certified acts
of terrorism acts but excludes coverage for nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological terrorism events as defined by the Terrorism
73
Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, which expires in December 2020. In addition, the Company maintains coverage for
certain cybersecurity losses with limits of $5 million per occurrence and in the aggregate providing first and third party coverage
including network interruption, event management, cyber extortion and claims for media content, security and privacy liability.
Insurance premiums are typically charged directly to each of the retail properties and warehouses but not all of the cost of such
premiums are recovered. The Company is responsible for deductibles, losses in excess of insurance coverage, and the portion of
premiums not covered from retail properties, which could be material.
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism. However, we
cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future and expect premiums across
most property coverage lines to increase in light of recent events. The incurrence of uninsured losses, costs or uncovered premiums
could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Certain of our loans and other agreements contain customary covenants requiring the maintenance of insurance coverage. Although
we believe that we currently have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain
an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. If lenders or other counterparties insist on greater coverage
than we are able to obtain, such requirement could materially and adversely affect our ability to finance our properties and expand
our portfolio.
Hurricane-Related Charges
On September 20, 2017, Hurricane Maria made landfall, damaging our two properties in Puerto Rico. All anchor tenants were
open for business within weeks after the hurricane other than Marshalls at Montehiedra, which is being reconstructed. At year-
end, approximately 86% of all stores previously occupied prior to the hurricane (as measured by GLA) are open.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company has incurred approximately $5.1 million of costs remediating property damages caused
by the hurricane, $3.4 million capitalized within Construction in progress on the consolidated balance sheet and $1.7 million of
costs expensed within Casualty and impairment loss on the consolidated statement of income. The Company expects insurance
proceeds to cover substantially all of these losses subject to applicable deductibles of approximately $2.3 million.
The Company recognized $2.2 million of business interruption losses, net of $1.8 million in cash advances received from its
insurance carrier. Losses of $0.9 million pertained to rent abatements when the malls were closed or inoperable as a result of the
hurricane, recorded as a reduction of property rentals and tenant expense reimbursements, and $1.3 million was recorded as a
provision for doubtful accounts for unpaid rents. The Company expects to recover a significant portion of these losses from
insurance in 2018.
In the third quarter of 2017, the Company also recognized a $2.2 million charge reflecting the net book value of assets damaged
as a result of the hurricane included within Casualty and impairment loss on the consolidated statement of income.
The Company has comprehensive, all-risk property insurance coverage on its properties in Puerto Rico, including for business
interruption, with a $139 million limit of liability, subject to certain conditions, exclusions, deductibles and sub-limits.
To the extent insurance proceeds ultimately exceed the difference between replacement cost and net book value of the damaged
assets, the hurricane related expenses incurred, and/or business interruption losses recognized, the excess will be reflected as
income in the period those amounts are received or when receipt is deemed probable.
No determination has been made as to the total amount or timing of insurance payments that may be received as a result of the
hurricane.
Environmental Matters
Each of our properties has been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment at various times. Based on these
assessments and the projected remediation costs, we have accrued costs of $1.2 million and $1.3 million on our consolidated
balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, for potential remediation costs for environmental
contamination at two properties. While this accrual reflects our best estimates of the potential costs of remediation at these properties,
$0.1 million has currently been expended during the year ended December 31, 2017 and there can be no assurance that the actual
costs will not exceed this amount. With respect to our other properties, the environmental assessments did not reveal any material
environmental contamination. However, there can be no assurance that the identification of new areas of contamination, changes
in the extent or known scope of contamination, the discovery of additional sites, or changes in cleanup requirements would not
result in significant costs to us.
74
12.
PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS
The following is a summary of the composition of the prepaid expenses and other assets in the consolidated balance sheets:
(Amounts in thousands)
Real estate held for sale
Other assets
Deposits for acquisitions
Prepaid expenses:
Real estate taxes
Insurance
Rent, licenses/fees
Total Prepaid expenses and other assets
13.
OTHER LIABILITIES
Balance at
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
$
$
3,285
$
3,771
406
7,094
2,793
1,210
18,559
$
—
2,161
6,600
5,198
2,545
938
17,442
The following is a summary of the composition of other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets:
(Amounts in thousands)
Deferred ground rent expense
Deferred tax liability, net
Deferred tenant revenue
Environmental remediation costs
Other liabilities
Total Other liabilities
Balance at
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
$
$
6,499
$
2,828
4,183
1,232
429
15,171
$
6,284
3,802
3,280
1,309
—
14,675
14.
INTEREST AND DEBT EXPENSE
The following table sets forth the details of interest and debt expense:
(Amounts in thousands)
Interest expense
Amortization of deferred financing costs
Total Interest and debt expense
2017
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
$
$
53,342
2,876
56,218
$
$
49,051
2,830
51,881
$
$
52,846
2,738
55,584
75
15.
EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
At-The-Market Program
In 2016, the Company established an at-the-market (“ATM”) equity program, pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell
from time to time its common shares, par value $0.01 per share, with an aggregate gross sales price of up to $250.0 million through
a consortium of broker dealers acting as sales agents. As of December 31, 2017, $241.3 million of common shares remained
available for issuance under this ATM equity program and there were no common shares issued under the ATM equity program
during the year ended December 31, 2017. From September 2016 to December 31, 2016, the Company issued 307,342 common
shares at a weighted average price of $28.45 under its ATM equity program, generating cash proceeds of $8.7 million. We paid
$0.1 million of commissions to distribution agents and $0.4 million in additional offering expenses related to the issuance of these
common shares. Actual future sales will depend on a variety of factors including, but not limited to, market conditions, the trading
price of our common shares and our capital needs. We have no obligation to sell the remaining shares available under the active
ATM equity program.
Underwritten Public Offering
On May 10, 2017, the Company issued 7.7 million common shares of beneficial interest in an underwritten public offering pursuant
to the Company’s effective shelf registration statement previously filed on Form S-3 (File No. 333-212951) with the SEC on
August 5, 2016. This offering generated cash proceeds of $193.5 million, net of $1.3 million of issuance costs.
Stock Purchase Agreement
On August 4, 2017, the Company issued 6.25 million common shares of beneficial interest to a large institutional investor at a net
price of $24.80 per share, pursuant to the Company’s effective shelf registration statement previously filed on Form S-3 (File No.
333-212951) with the SEC on August 5, 2016. The issuance was a direct sale with no underwriter or placement agent such that
net cash proceeds to the Company were $155 million.
Units of the Operating Partnership
An equivalent number of common units were issued by the Operating Partnership to the Company in connection with the Company’s
issuance of common shares of beneficial interest, as discussed above.
The Operating Partnership’s capital includes general and common limited partnership interests in the operating partnership (“OP
Units”). As of December 31, 2017, Urban Edge owned approximately 89.9% of the outstanding common OP Units with the
remaining limited OP Units held by Vornado Realty L.P., members of management, our Board of Trustees and contributors of
property interests acquired. Urban Edge serves as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. The third party unitholders
have limited rights over the Operating Partnership such that they do not have characteristics of a controlling financial interest. As
such, the Operating Partnership is considered a variable interest entity (“VIE”), and the Company is the primary beneficiary which
consolidates it. The Company’s only investment is the Operating Partnership. The VIE’s assets can be used for purposes other
than the settlement of the VIE’s obligations and the Company’s partnership interest is considered a majority voting interest.
The Operating Partnership issued 1.8 million OP units in connection with the acquisition of Yonkers Gateway Center on January 4,
2017, at a value of $27.09 per unit. On May 24 and 25, 2017, the Operating Partnership issued 2.6 million OP units and 1.9 million
OP units, respectively, in connection with the Portfolio acquisition at a value of $27.02 per unit (refer to Note 4 Acquisitions and
Dispositions).
Dividends and Distributions
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company declared common stock dividends and OP unit distributions
of $0.88 and $0.82 per share/unit, respectively. We have a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the “DRIP”), whereby shareholders may
use their dividends to purchase shares. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, 12,788, 12,564 and 11,407
shares were issued under the DRIP, respectively.
Noncontrolling Interests in Operating Partnership
Noncontrolling interests in the operating partnership reflected on the consolidated balance sheets of the Company are comprised
of OP units and limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership in the form of LTIP unit awards. In connection with the
separation, the Company issued 5.7 million OP units, representing a 5.4% interest in the Operating Partnership to VRLP in exchange
for interests in VRLP properties contributed by VRLP. LTIP unit awards were granted to certain executives pursuant to our 2015
Omnibus Share Plan (the “Omnibus Share Plan”). OP units were issued to contributors in exchange for their property interests in
connection with the Company’s acquisition of Yonkers Gateway Center and the Portfolio acquisition. The total of the OP units
and LTIP units represent a 9.3% weighted-average interest in the Operating Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Holders of outstanding vested LTIP units may, from and after two years from the date of issuance, redeem their LTIP units for
76
cash, or for the Company’s common shares on a one-for-one basis, solely at our election. Holders of outstanding OP units may,
at a determinable date, redeem their units for cash or the Company’s common shares on a one-for-one basis, solely at our election.
Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Subsidiaries
The noncontrolling interest relates to the 5% interest held by others in our property in Walnut Creek, CA (Mount Diablo). The net
income attributable to noncontrolling interest is presented separately in our consolidated and combined statements of income.
16.
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Omnibus Share Plan
On January 7, 2015 our board and initial shareholder approved the Urban Edge Properties Omnibus Share Plan, under which
awards may be granted up to a maximum of 15,000,000 of our common shares or share equivalents. Pursuant to the Omnibus
Share Plan, stock options, LTIP units, operating partnership units and restricted shares were granted.
Outperformance Plans
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Company approved the Company’s 2015 Outperformance Plan
(“2015 OPP”) on November 3, 2015 and the Company’s 2017 Outperformance Plan (“2017 OPP”) on February 24, 2017. Both
Outperformance Plans are multi-year, performance-based equity compensation plans under which participants, including our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, have the opportunity to earn awards in the form of LTIP units if, and only if, we outperform
a predetermined total shareholder return (“TSR”) and/or outperform the market with respect to a relative TSR in any year during
the requisite performance periods as described below. The aggregate notional amounts of the 2015 OPP grant and the 2017 OPP
grant are $10.2 million and $12.0 million, respectively.
Awards under the 2015 OPP and the 2017 OPP may be earned if we (i) achieve a TSR level greater than 7% per annum, or 21%
over the three-year performance measurement period, and/or (ii) achieve a TSR equal to or above, that of the 50th percentile of a
retail REIT peer group (“Peer Group”) comprised of our peer companies, over a three-year performance measurement period.
Distributions on awards accrue during the measurement period, except that 10% of such distributions are paid in cash. If the
designated performance objectives are achieved, LTIP units are also subject to time-based vesting requirements. Awards earned
under the 2015 OPP and the 2017 OPP vest 50% in year three, 25% in year four and 25% in year five.
The fair values of the 2015 OPP and the 2017 OPP on the dates of grant were $3.9 million and $4.1 million, respectively. A Monte
Carlo simulation was used to estimate the fair values based on the probability of satisfying the market conditions and the projected
share prices at the time of payments, discounted to the valuation dates over the three-year performance periods. For the 2015 OPP,
assumptions include historical volatility (25.0%), risk-free interest rates (1.2%), and historical daily return as compared to our
Peer Group (which ranged from 19.0% to 27.0%). For the 2017 OPP, assumptions include historical volatility (19.7%), risk-free
interest rates (1.5%), and historical daily return as compared to our Peer Group. For both plans, such amounts are being amortized
into expense over a five-year period from the dates of grant, using graded vesting attribution models. In the years ending
December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 we recognized $2.0 million, $1.1 million and $0.2 million of compensation expense related
to the 2015 and 2017 OPPs’ LTIP Units, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, there was $4.6 million of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to the 2015 and 2017 OPPs’ LTIP Units, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of
3.7 years.
77
Shares Under Option
All stock options granted have ten-year contractual lives, containing vesting terms of three to five years. As of December 31, 2017,
the weighted average contractual term of shares under option outstanding at the end of the period is 7.3 years. The following table
presents stock option activity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015:
Outstanding at January 1, 2015
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
Exercisable at December 31, 2017
Shares
Under
Options
Weighted Average
Exercise Price per
Share
Weighted Average
Remaining Expected
Term
(In years)
— $
2,302,762
—
(13,623)
2,289,139
196,713
(8,501)
(5,067)
2,472,284
137,259
—
(5,879)
2,603,664
143,060
$
$
—
23.89
—
24.46
23.89
23.52
24.46
24.46
23.86
28.36
—
23.17
24.09
23.67
—
6.15
—
—
6.15
6.00
—
—
5.33
6.01
—
—
4.40
—
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the fair value of the options granted was estimated on the
grant date using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions:
February 17,
2015
March 12,
2015
April 20,
2015
August 17,
2015
February 8,
2016
February 24,
2017
Risk-free interest rate
Expected option life
Expected volatility
1.76%
6.00
24.00%
1.91%
6.50
25.00%
1.60%
6.25
26.00%
1.95%
6.25
27.00%
1.31%
6.25
23.94%
1.93%
6.25
25.06%
The options were granted with an exercise price equivalent to the average of the high and low share price on the grant date.
78
Restricted Shares
The following table presents information regarding restricted share activity during the twelve months ended December 31,
2017, 2016, and 2015:
Shares
Weighted Average Grant
Date Fair Value per Share
Unvested at January 1, 2015
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Unvested at December 31, 2015
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Unvested at December 31, 2016
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Unvested at December 31, 2017
— $
35,460
(1,022)
(3,721)
30,717
117,399
(15,977)
(2,744)
129,395
104,698
(53,236)
(5,427)
175,430
$
—
22.84
24.46
24.18
22.62
24.55
23.17
23.55
24.29
27.69
25.13
24.64
26.05
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we granted 104,698, 117,399, and 35,460 restricted shares, respectively,
that are subject to forfeiture and vest over periods ranging from one to four years. The total grant date value of the 53,236, 15,977,
and 1,022 restricted shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $1.3 million, $0.4 million and
$25 thousand, respectively.
In connection with the separation transaction, there were 433,040 LTIP units issued to executives during the year ended
December 31, 2015 of which 343,232 were immediately vested. During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were 31,734
additional LTIP units issued to executives. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, 16,789, and 39,439 units vested,
respectively. The remaining 65,314 units vest over a weighted average period of 2.4 years.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
Share-based compensation expense, which is included in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated and combined
statements of income, is summarized as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)
Share-based compensation expense components:
Restricted share expense
Stock option expense
LTIP expense(2)
Outperformance Plan (“OPP”) expense(1)
Total Share-based compensation expense
2017
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
$
$
1,961
$
1,314
$
2,569
557
2,050
2,437
473
1,209
7,137
$
5,433
$
282
1,901
7,748
330
10,261
(1) OPP Expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 includes $30 thousand, $0.1 million, and $0.2 million, respectively, of
unrecognized compensation expense of awards issued under Vornado’s OPP for UE employees who were previously Vornado employees. The
remaining OPP unrecognized compensation expense was transferred from Vornado to UE as of the separation date and is amortized on a
straight-line basis over the remaining life of the OPP awards issued.
(2) LTIP expense excludes the expense associated with LTIP units under the 2015 OPP and the 2017 OPP.
As of December 31, 2017, we had a total of $12.0 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested and restricted
share-based payment arrangements including unvested stock options, LTIP units, and restricted share awards which were granted
under our Omnibus Share Plan as well as OPP awards issued by Vornado. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 2.6 years.
79
17.
EARNINGS PER SHARE AND UNIT
Urban Edge Earnings per Share
We have calculated earnings per share (“EPS”) under the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation
methodology whereby EPS for each class of Urban Edge common shares and participating securities is calculated according to
dividends declared and participating rights in undistributed earnings. Restricted shares issued pursuant to our share-based
compensation program are considered participating securities, and as such have non-forfeitable rights to receive dividends.
The computation of diluted EPS reflects potential dilution of securities by adding potential common shares, including stock options
and unvested restricted shares, to the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. For the year ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, there were options outstanding for 2,603,664, 2,472,284, and 2,289,139 shares, respectively,
that potentially could be exercised for common shares. During 2017 and 2016, respectively, 167,933 and 256,917 options with
exercise prices ranging from $22.83 to $28.36, were included in the diluted EPS calculation as their option prices were lower than
the average market prices of our common shares. In addition, as of December 31, 2017 there were 175,430 unvested restricted
shares outstanding that potentially could become unrestricted common shares. The computation of diluted EPS for the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 included the 167,100, 114,354, and 25,829 weighted average unvested restricted shares
outstanding, respectively, as their effect is dilutive.
The effect of the redemption of OP and vested LTIP units is not reflected in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share, as they are redeemable for common shares on a one-for-one basis. The income allocable to such units is allocated on this
same basis and reflected as noncontrolling interests in the accompanying consolidated and combined financial statements. As
such, the assumed redemption of these units would have no net impact on the determination of diluted earnings per share since
they would be anti-dilutive.
As described in Note 2, the common shares outstanding at the date of the separation are reflected as outstanding for all periods
prior to the separation. The following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted earnings per share:
The following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted earnings per share:
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Net income attributable to common shareholders
Less: Earnings allocated to unvested participating securities
Net income available for common shareholders - basic
Impact of assumed conversions:
OP and LTIP units
Net income available for common shareholders - dilutive
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options using the treasury stock method
Restricted share awards
Assumed conversion of OP and LTIP units
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
Earnings per share available to common shareholders:
Earnings per common share - Basic
Earnings per common share - Diluted
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2017
2015
67,070
(155)
66,915
$
$
90,815
(114)
90,701
$
$
5,782
53
72,697
$
90,754
$
38,785
(23)
38,762
—
38,762
107,132
99,364
99,252
168
167
10,923
118,390
257
114
59
—
26
—
99,794
99,278
0.62
0.61
$
$
0.91
0.91
$
$
0.39
0.39
$
$
$
$
$
80
Operating Partnership Earnings per Unit
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per unit:
(Amounts in thousands, except per unit amounts)
Numerator:
Net income attributable to unitholders
Less: net income attributable to participating securities
Net income available for unitholders
Denominator:
Weighted average units outstanding - basic
Effect of dilutive securities issued by Urban Edge
Unvested LTIP units
Weighted average units outstanding - diluted
Earnings per unit available to unitholders:
Earnings per unit - Basic
Earnings per unit - Diluted
18.
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited)
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
72,894
(155)
72,739
$
$
96,627
(211)
96,416
$
$
41,332
(22)
41,310
117,779
335
276
118,390
105,455
371
273
106,099
105,276
26
72
105,374
0.62
0.61
$
$
0.91
0.91
$
$
0.39
0.39
$
$
$
$
The following tables summarize the quarterly results of operations of Urban Edge Properties and Urban Edge Properties LP for
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
(Amounts in thousands, except per share/unit amounts)
Total revenue
Operating income
Net (loss) income
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests in
operating partnership
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in
consolidated subsidiaries
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders
Net (loss) income attributable to unitholders
Earnings (loss) per common share - Basic
Earnings (loss) per common share - Diluted
Earnings (loss) per common unit - Basic
Earnings (loss) per common unit - Diluted
Three Months Ended,
December 31,
2017
September 30,
2017
June 30,
2017
$
97,376
$
94,101
$
89,501
$
30,742
(15,873)
33,190
19,156
28,515
14,920
March 31,
2017
126,064
69,317
54,735
1,607
(1,967)
(1,326)
(4,138)
(11)
(14,277)
(15,884)
(0.13)
(0.13)
(0.13)
(0.13)
(11)
17,178
19,145
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
(11)
13,583
14,909
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
(11)
50,586
54,724
0.51
0.50
0.51
0.50
81
(Amounts in thousands, except per share/unit amounts)
Total revenue
Operating income
Net income
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in
operating partnership
Net (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
in consolidated subsidiaries
Net income attributable to common shareholders
Net income attributable to unitholders
Earnings per common share - Basic
Earnings per common share - Diluted
Earnings per common unit - Basic
Earnings per common unit - Diluted
19.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Three Months Ended,
December 31,
2016
September 30,
2016
June 30,
2016
March 31,
2016
$
83,478
$
79,973
$
79,457
$
33,428
20,266
33,414
20,505
32,790
36,071
83,068
33,386
19,788
(1,218)
(1,239)
(2,201)
(1,154)
(4)
19,044
20,262
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.19
(1)
19,265
20,504
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.19
(2)
33,868
36,069
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
4
18,638
19,792
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.19
Pursuant to the Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC, we have evaluated subsequent events and transactions that occurred
after our December 31, 2017 consolidated balance sheet date for potential recognition or disclosure in our consolidated and
combined financial statements.
During 2017, our property in Englewood, NJ was transferred to a receiver. On January 31, 2018, the property was sold at a
foreclosure sale. Upon issuance of the court’s order approving the sale and discharging the receiver, all assets and liabilities related
to the property will be removed.
82
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURES
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Controls and Procedures (Urban Edge Properties)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Because of inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness
of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under
the Exchange Act is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of Urban Edge Properties and subsidiaries (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company, defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal
executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s board of trustees,
management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting, which requires
the use of certain estimates and judgments, and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
•
•
•
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the Company;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being
made only in accordance with authorizations of management and trustees of the Company; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of
the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and
procedures or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and fraud. In designing and evaluating our control
system, management recognized that any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact
that there are resource constraints, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls
can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, that may affect our operation have been or
will be detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of
some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management’s override of the control. The design of any system of
controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that
any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions that cannot be anticipated at the present time, or the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due
to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.
83
The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Internal Control-
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework)
(the COSO criteria). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2017, the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting was effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 has been audited by Deloitte
& Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm as stated in their attestation report which is included herein.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that
occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Controls and Procedures (Urban Edge Properties LP)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Operating Partnership’s management maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15
(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our general partner, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Because of inherent limitations, disclosure controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives
of disclosure controls and procedures are met.
The Operating Partnership’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our
general partner, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our general partner concluded that, as of the end of the
period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information
required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is processed, recorded, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Operating Partnership’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting for the Operating Partnership, defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Operating Partnership’s principal executive and
principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the board of trustees, management and other
personnel of the Operating Partnership’s general partner, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting, which requires the use of certain estimates and judgments, and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
•
•
•
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the Company;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being
made only in accordance with authorizations of management and trustees of the Operating Partnership’s general partner;
and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of
the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
The Operating Partnership’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our general partner,
does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and
fraud. In designing and evaluating our control system, management recognized that any control system, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Further,
the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and management necessarily was required
84
to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, that may affect our operation have been or will be detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that
judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally,
controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management’s
override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood
of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions that cannot be anticipated at the present
time, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-
effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.
The Operating Partnership’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, the Operating Partnership’s management used the criteria set forth
by the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2017, the
Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting was effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
The effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 has been audited
by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm as stated in their attestation report which is included
herein.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that
occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
85
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Shareholders and Board of Trustees
Urban Edge Properties
New York, New York
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Urban Edge Properties (the "Company") as of December 31, 2017,
based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated
Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, of the Company and our report
dated February 14, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S.
federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
February 14, 2018
86
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Partners of
Urban Edge Properties LP
New York, New York
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Urban Edge Properties LP (the "Operating Partnership") as of
December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Operating Partnership maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 of the Operating Partnership and
our report dated February 14, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Operating Partnership's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for
its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership's
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership
in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
February 14, 2018
87
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by Item 10 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to Urban Edge Properties’ 2018
Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 11 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to Urban Edge Properties’ 2018
Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2017, relating to our equity compensation plans pursuant to
which our common shares or other equity securities may be granted from time to time.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights (1)
Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights (2)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column a)(3)
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
including the employee share
purchase plan
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
Total
(1) Includes an aggregate of (i) 2,603,664 common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and (ii) 1,097,734 common shares issuable
in exchange for common units which may, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, be issuable pursuant to outstanding LTIP Units in our
Operating Partnership (“LTIP Units”). The LTIP Units outstanding as of December 31, 2017 include 632,960 LTIP Units issued pursuant to
our 2015 OPP and 2017 OPP, which remain subject to performance-based vesting criteria.
3,701,398
3,701,398
6,506,015
6,506,015
21.79
21.79
N/A
N/A
N/A
$
$
(2) The LTIP Units do not have an exercise price. Accordingly, these awards are not included in the weighted-average exercise price calculation.
(3) Includes (i) 4,850,519 common shares remaining available for issuance under the Urban Edge Properties 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”) and (ii) 1,655,496 common share remaining available under the Urban Edge Properties 2015 Employee Share Purchase Plan (“ESPP”).
The number of common shares remaining available for issuance under the Plan is based on awards being granted as "Full Value Awards," as
defined in the Plan, including awards such as restricted stock, LTIP units or performance units that do not require the payment of an exercise
price. If we were to grant awards other than “Full Value Awards," as defined in the Plan, including stock options or stock appreciation rights,
the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the Plan would be 9,701,038. Pursuant to the terms of the ESPP, on
each January 1 prior to the tenth anniversary of the ESPP’s effective date, an additional number of common shares will be added to the
maximum number of shares authorized for issuance under the ESPP equal to the lesser of (a) 0.1% of the total number of common shares
outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year and (b) 150,000 common shares; provided that the Compensation Committee of
our Board of Trustees may act prior to January 1 of any calendar year to provide that there will be no increase in the share reserve for that
calendar year, or that the increase in the share reserve for that calendar year shall be less than the increase that would otherwise occur.
Additional information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by Item 12 will be
included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to Urban Edge Properties’ 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is
incorporated herein by reference.
88
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by Item 13 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to Urban Edge Properties’ 2018
Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by Item 14 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to Urban Edge Properties’ 2018
Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
PART IV
(a)(1) Financial Statements
Our consolidated and combined financial statements and notes thereto, together with the Reports of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm are included as a separate section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K commencing on page 47.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Our financial statement schedules are included in a separate section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K commencing on page
94.
(3) Exhibits
A list of exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is set forth on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits and
is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) See Exhibit Index
(c) Schedules other than those listed above are omitted because they are not applicable or the information required is included in
the consolidated and combined financial statements or the notes thereto.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not applicable.
89
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
2.1
3.1
3.2
10.1
10.2
10.3*
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11*
10.12*
10.13*
10.14*
10.15*
10.16*
10.17*
10.18*
Exhibit Description
Separation and Distribution Agreement by and among Vornado Realty Trust, Vornado Realty L.P., Urban Edge
Properties and Urban Edge Properties LP, dated as of January 14, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1
to Form 8-K filed January 21, 2015)
Declaration of Trust of Urban Edge Properties, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to Form 8-K filed January 21, 2015)
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Urban Edge Properties (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K
filed January 21, 2015)
Amendment to Transition Services Agreement by and between Vornado Realty Trust and Urban Edge Properties,
dated as of June 28, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on August 5, 2016)
Transition Services Agreement by and between Vornado Realty Trust and Urban Edge Properties, dated as of
January 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed January 21, 2015)
Employee Matters Agreement by and between Vornado Realty Trust, Vornado Realty L.P., Urban Edge Properties
and Urban Edge Properties LP, dated as of January 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Form
8-K filed January 21, 2015)
Tax Matters Agreement by and between Vornado Realty Trust and Urban Edge Properties, dated as of January 15,
2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed January 21, 2015)
Limited Partnership Agreement of Urban Edge Properties LP, dated as of January 14, 2015 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed January 21, 2015)
First Amendment dated as of March 7, 2017, to Revolving Credit Agreement among Urban Edge Properties LP,
as Borrower, to the Banker party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on May 3, 2017)
Revolving Credit Agreement among Urban Edge Properties LP, as Borrower, the Banks party thereto, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, dated as of January 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.10 to Form 8-K filed January 21, 2015)
Tax Protection Agreement dated as of May 24, 2017, by and among Urban Edge Properties LP; Urban Edge
Properties; and Acklinis Yonkers Realty, L.L.C., Acklinis Realty Holding, LLC, Acklinis Original Building, L.L.C.,
A & R Woodbridge Shopping Center, L.L.C., A & R Millburn Associates, L.P., Ackrik Associates, L.P., A & R
Manchester, LLC, A & R Westfield Lincoln Plaza, LLC and A & R Westfield Broad Street, LLC. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on August 2, 2017)
Contribution Agreement dated as of April 7, 2017, by and among Urban Edge Properties LP; Urban Edge Properties;
and Acklinis Yonkers Realty, L.L.C., Acklinis Realty Holding, LLC, Acklinis Original Building, L.L.C., A & R
Woodbridge Shopping Center, L.L.C., A & R Millburn Associates, L.P., Ackrik Associates, L.P., A & R Manchester,
LLC, A & R Westfield Lincoln Plaza, LLC and A & R Westfield Broad Street, LLC. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q filed on August 2, 2017)
Loan Agreement between VNO Bergen Mall Owner LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated
March 25, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Amendment No. 2 to Form 10 filed November 13,
2014)
Underwriting Agreement, dated May 4, 2017, by and among Urban Edge Properties, Urban Edge Properties LP
and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Form 8-K filed May 4, 2017)
Urban Edge Properties 2015 Employee Share Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form
S-8 filed February 17, 2015)
Urban Edge Properties 2015 Omnibus Share Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K filed
January 21, 2015)
Form of Performance LTIP Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on
February 28, 2017)
Amendment, dated as of January 14, 2015, to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Vornado
Realty Trust and Jeffrey Olson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Form 8-K filed January 21, 2015)
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Vornado Realty Trust and Jeffrey Olson (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 3 to Form 10 filed December 11, 2014)
Employment Offer Letter between Urban Edge Properties and Robert Minutoli (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on October 18, 2017)
Employment Agreement between Urban Edge Properties and Mark Langer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2015)
90
10.19*
10.20*
21.1†
23.1†
23.2†
24.1†
31.1†
31.2†
31.3†
31.4†
32.1†
32.2†
101.INS
101.SCH
101.CAL
101.LAB
101.PRE
101.DEF
Employment Offer Letter between Urban Edge Properties and Herb Eilberg (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on May 4, 2016)
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Urban Edge Properties and each of its trustees and executive officers
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Form 10-K/A filed on March 23, 2015)
List of Subsidiaries
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Urban Edge Properties
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Urban Edge Properties LP
Power of Attorney (included on signature page)
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer for Urban Edge Properties pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer for Urban Edge Properties pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer for Urban Edge Properties LP pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer for Urban Edge Properties LP pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Urban Edge Properties pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Urban Edge Properties LP pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
XBRL Instance Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
XBRL Extension Calculation Linkbase
XBRL Extension Labels Linkbase
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
* Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.
† Filed electronically herewith
91
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed
on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
(Registrant)
Date: February 14, 2018
By:
/s/ Mark Langer
Mark Langer, Chief Financial Officer
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
By: Urban Edge Properties, General Partner
Date: February 14, 2018
By:
/s/ Mark Langer
Mark Langer, Chief Financial Officer
92
KNOWN BY ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the individuals whose signatures appear below hereby constitute
and appoint Jeffrey S. Olson and Mark Langer, and each of them severally, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and
agents with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead in any and all
capacities to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, full power and authority to do or perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection
therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or of his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do to cause to be done by virtue
hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature
Title
Date
By:
/s/ Jeffrey S. Olson
Chairman of the Board of Trustees
February 14, 2018
Jeffrey S. Olson
By:
/s/ Mark Langer
Mark Langer
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 14, 2018
By:
/s/ Jennifer Holmes
Chief Accounting Officer
February 14, 2018
Jennifer Holmes
(Principal Accounting Officer)
By:
/s/ Michael A. Gould
Trustee
Michael A. Gould
By:
/s/ Steven H. Grapstein
Trustee
Steven H. Grapstein
By:
/s/ Steven J. Guttman
Trustee
Steven J. Guttman
By:
/s/ Amy B. Lane
Trustee
Amy B. Lane
By:
/s/ Kevin P. O’Shea
Trustee
Kevin P. O’Shea
By:
/s/ Steven Roth
Trustee
Steven Roth
February 14, 2018
February 14, 2018
February 14, 2018
February 14, 2018
February 14, 2018
February 14, 2018
93
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES AND URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
SCHEDULE II- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands)
Column A
Description
Year Ended December 31, 2017:
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Year Ended December 31, 2016:
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Year Ended December 31, 2015:
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Column B
Balance
at Beginning
of Year
Column C
Additions
(Reversals)
Expensed
Column D
Column E
Uncollectible
Accounts
Written-Off
Balance
at End
of Year
$
2,593
$
3,445
$
(607) $
5,431
1,926
2,432
1,214
1,526
(547)
(2,032)
2,593
1,926
94
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES AND URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(in thousands)
Initial cost to company
Gross amount at which
carried at close of period
Description
Encumbrances
Land
Building and
improvements
Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to
acquisition
Land
Building and
improvements
Total(2)
Accumulated
depreciation
and
amortization(1)
Date of
construction
Date
acquired
SHOPPING CENTERS AND MALLS:
Allentown, PA
$
— $
187
$
15,580
$(15,767)
$
— $
— $
— $
—
1957
1957
Baltimore (Towson),
MD
Bensalem, PA
Bergen Town Center
- East,
Paramus, NJ
Bergen Town Center
- West,
Paramus, NJ
Bethlehem, PA
Brick, NJ
Bronx
(Bruckner
Boulevard), NY
Bronx
(Shops at Bruckner),
NY
Bronx
(1750-1780 Gun Hill
Road), NY
Broomall, PA
Buffalo (Amherst),
NY
Cambridge (leased
through 2033)(3), MA
Carlstadt (leased
through 2050)(3), NJ
Charleston (leased
through 2063)(3), SC
Cherry Hill (Cherry
Hill Commons), NJ
Cherry Hill (Plaza at
Cherry Hill), NJ
Chicopee, MA
Commack (leased
through 2021)(3), NY
Dewitt (leased
through 2041)(3), NY
East Hanover
(200 - 240 Route 10
West), NJ
East Hanover
(280 Route 10 West),
NJ
East Rutherford, NJ
Englewood, NJ
Freeport
(240 West Sunrise
Highway) (leased
through 2040)(3), NY
24,500
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
581
3,227
16,616
581
19,843
20,424
(6,269)
2,727
6,698
2,042
2,727
8,740
11,467
(4,290)
6,305
— 38,249
6,305
38,249
44,554
(7,456)
300,000
15,812
82,240
342,842
33,563
407,331
440,894
(109,505)
—
50,000
827
1,391
5,200
11,179
1,603
9,268
839
1,391
6,791
20,447
7,630
21,838
(5,793)
(14,550)
1968
1972/
1999
1957/
2009
1957/
2009
1966
1968
1968
1972
2003
2003/
2015
1966
1968
—
66,100
259,503
(29,809)
48,889
246,904
295,793
(18,281)
N/A
2007
12,162
—
32,979
—
—
32,979
32,979
(1,077)
N/A
2017
6,427
850
5,743
—
—
—
11,885
22,087
2,171
1,399
6,428
850
33,972
3,570
40,400
4,420
(8,325)
(2,842)
2009
1966
2005
1966
4,056
14,068
5,107
18,760
23,867
(8,777)
1968
1968
—
16,458
147
137
3,634
—
—
—
—
147
147
(146)
N/A
16,595
16,595
(4,201)
N/A
2007
3,634
3,634
(1,022)
N/A
5,864
2,694
5,408
4,864
9,102
13,966
(4,694)
1964
28,930
14,602
33,666
(465)
14,602
33,201
47,803
(1,409)
895
—
—
559
—
43
—
184
7,116
6,363
—
4,515
895
—
—
559
—
227
895
227
N/A
1969
—
(215)
N/A
2006
7,116
10,879
7,116
11,438
(1,981)
(6,117)
N/A
1964
1957/
1972
East Brunswick, NJ
63,000
2,417
17,169
7,475
2,417
24,644
27,061
(17,559)
Rockaway, NJ
27,800
63,000
2,232
18,241
19,027
2,671
36,829
39,500
(16,928)
1962
—
23,000
11,537
—
—
2,300
—
7,075
274
36,727
17,245
(8,390)
1,495
—
—
7,075
37,001
9,660
7,075
37,001
11,155
(2,251)
(7,392)
(1,410)
N/A
2007
N/A
—
—
—
260
—
260
260
(217)
N/A
2005
95
2006
1964
2017
1969
2006
1964
1957/
1972
1962/
1998
2007
2007
Initial cost to company
Gross amount at which
carried at close of period
Description
Encumbrances
Land
Building and
improvements
Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to
acquisition
Land
Building and
improvements
Total(2)
Accumulated
depreciation
and
amortization(1)
Date of
construction
Date
acquired
Freeport
(437 East Sunrise
Highway), NY
Garfield, NJ
Glen Burnie, MD
Glenolden, PA
Hackensack, NJ
Hazlet, NJ
Huntington, NY
Inwood, NY
Jersey City (Hudson
Commons), NJ
Jersey City (Hudson
Mall), NJ
Kearny, NJ
Lancaster, PA
Las Catalinas, Puerto
Rico
Lawnside, NJ
Lodi (Route 17
North), NJ
Lodi (Washington
Street), NJ
Manalapan, NJ
Manchester, MO
Marlton, NJ
Middletown, NJ
Milford (leased
through 2019)(3), MA
Millburn, NJ
Montclair, NJ
Montehiedra, Puerto
Rico
Morris Plains, NJ
Mount Kisco, NY
New Hyde Park
(leased through
2029)(3), NY
Newington, CT
Norfolk
(leased through
2069)(3), VA
North Bergen
(Kennedy
Boulevard), NJ
North Bergen
(Tonnelle Avenue),
NJ
43,100
40,300
—
—
66,400
—
—
—
1,231
45
462
850
692
7,400
21,200
12,419
4,747
8,068
2,571
1,820
4,311
41,981
2,481
728
10,219
5,607
9,413
(2,145)
33,667
19,097
4,072
2,856
1,231
45
462
850
542
7,400
21,200
12,419
9,058
50,050
5,052
2,548
15,976
7,268
37,739
21,953
10,289
50,095
5,514
3,398
16,518
14,668
58,939
34,372
(6,222)
(12,189)
(3,462)
(2,256)
(9,939)
(1,917)
(9,196)
(6,974)
1981
2009
1958
1975
1963
N/A
N/A
N/A
1981
1998
1958
1975
1963
2007
2007
2004
29,000
652
7,495
950
652
8,445
9,097
(3,376)
1965
1965
25,004
15,824
—
—
309
3,140
37,593
3,376
63
184
7,997
2,129
15,824
296
3,140
37,777
11,386
2,192
53,601
11,682
5,332
(1,878)
(4,254)
(779)
N/A
1938
1966
130,000
15,280
64,370
14,414
15,280
78,784
94,064
(36,399)
1996
4,956
5,807
(3,789)
1969
9,483
9,721
(4,308)
1999
—
—
—
—
12,500
37,400
31,400
1,226
238
7,606
725
4,409
1,611
283
3,164
1,417
9,446
36
13,125
7,189
13,756
3,464
5,248
2,678
6,857
704
13,557
3,127
851
238
7,606
1,046
4,409
1,454
283
15,804
13,725
14,460
17,178
8,375
23,410
14,771
18,869
18,632
8,658
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
24,000
15,783
—
66
25,837
419
(928)
434
15,783
24,909
40,692
66
853
919
116,236
—
9,182
1,104
14,451
22,700
66,751
24,170
6,411
26,700
2,189
1,960
—
2,421
4
—
1,200
2,049
100,104
(39,203)
9,267
1,104
23,297
—
2,421
90,837
8,601
28,063
4
3,249
9,705
51,360
4
5,670
(4,839)
(9,430)
(322)
(10,408)
(6,414)
—
(840)
(724)
(7,165)
(6,960)
N/A
1971
N/A
1973
1963
N/A
N/A
1972
1996/
2015
1961
N/A
(4)
(1,224)
1970
1965
2017
1959
1966
2002
1969/
2015
1975
2004
1971
2017
1973
1963
1976
2017
1972
1997
1985
2007
1976
1965
—
3,927
15
—
3,942
3,942
(3,486)
N/A
2005
2,308
636
175
2,308
810
3,118
(534)
1993
1959
—
—
—
—
100,000
24,493
— 66,789
34,473
North Plainfield, NJ
25,100
Oceanside, NY
Paramus
(leased through
2033)(3), NJ
Queens, NY
—
—
—
6,577
2,710
13,983
2,306
588
—
6,577
2,710
—
— 12,569
—
14,537
12,304
1,589
14,537
56,809
14,571
2,306
12,569
13,892
91,282
21,148
5,016
12,569
28,429
(14,577)
(3,527)
(610)
(3,696)
(790)
2009
1955
N/A
1957/
2009
N/A
2006
1989
2007
2003
2015
96
Initial cost to company
Gross amount at which
carried at close of period
Description
Encumbrances
Land
Building and
improvements
Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to
acquisition
Land
Building and
improvements
Total(2)
Accumulated
depreciation
and
amortization(1)
Date of
construction
Date
acquired
Rochester
(Henrietta)
(leased through
2056)(3), NY
Rochester, NY
Rockville, MD
Salem (leased
through 2102)(3), NH
Signal Hill, CA
South Plainfield
(leased through
2039)(3), NJ
Springfield, MA
Springfield (leased
through 2025)(3), PA
Staten Island, NY
Totowa, NJ
Turnersville, NJ
Tyson’s Corner
(leased through
2035)(3), VA
Union
(2445 Springfield
Avenue), NJ
Union
(Route 22 and
Morris Avenue), NJ
Vallejo (leased
through 2043)(3), CA
Walnut Creek
(1149 South Main
Street), CA
Walnut Creek
(Mt. Diablo), CA
Watchung, NJ
West Babylon, NY
Westfield, NJ
Wheaton (leased
through 2060)(3), MD
Wilkes-Barre
(461 - 499 Mundy
Street), PA
Woodbridge
(Woodbridge
Commons), NJ
Woodbridge (Plaza
at Woodbridge), NJ
Wyomissing
(leased
through 2065)(3), PA
Yonkers, NY
York, PA
WAREHOUSES:
East Hanover - Five
Buildings, NJ
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1971
1966
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1993
N/A
1957/
1999
1974
1971
1966
2005
2006
2006
2007
2005
1966
2004
1957
1974
—
2,172
3,470
6,083
9,652
2,647
1,259
—
—
20,599
2,575
—
2,940
—
1
—
2,172
3,470
6,083
9,652
3,906
—
3,906
2,172
(3,544)
—
23,175
26,645
(7,296)
—
2,941
6,083
12,593
—
(827)
—
—
10,044
2,286
—
80
—
—
12,330
12,330
80
80
2,797
11,446
2,471
494
21,262
4,216
2,797
11,446
50,800
—
—
120
900
—
11,994
1,342
5,541
3,048
92
900
—
2,965
25,478
17,563
4,389
5,762
36,924
17,655
5,289
(3,347)
(80)
(1,226)
(8,543)
(14,197)
(2,274)
—
—
—
—
N/A
2006
45,600
19,700
45,090
19,700
45,090
64,790
(11,930)
N/A
2007
—
—
—
—
—
—
27,000
—
4,730
—
—
3,025
7,470
3,758
3,025
11,228
14,253
(6,337)
1962
1962
—
2,945
221
—
3,166
3,166
(968)
N/A
2006
2,699
19,930
(1,043)
2,699
18,887
21,586
(887)
N/A
2006
5,909
4,178
6,720
5,728
—
5,463
13,786
4,305
1,539
2,945
2,105
(97)
5,908
4,441
6,720
5,728
1,540
8,145
15,891
4,208
7,448
12,586
22,611
9,936
(207)
(5,308)
(3,537)
(109)
N/A
1994
N/A
N/A
2007
1959
2007
2017
—
5,367
—
—
5,367
5,367
(1,509)
N/A
2006
6,053
26,646
1,614
6,053
28,260
34,313
(7,283)
N/A
2007
22,100
1,509
2,675
2,908
1,539
5,553
7,092
(2,919)
1959
1959
55,340
21,547
75,017
(829)
21,547
74,188
95,735
(2,327)
N/A
2017
—
—
2,646
33,227
63,341
110,635
—
409
2,568
1,869
6,175
2,097
—
4,515
4,515
(3,612)
64,643
115,508
180,151
—
409
4,665
5,074
(6,154)
N/A
N/A
1970
2005
2017
1970
40,700
576
7,752
30,033
691
37,670
38,361
(17,243)
1972
1972
97
Initial cost to company
Gross amount at which
carried at close of period
Description
Encumbrances
Land
Building and
improvements
Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to
acquisition
Land
Building and
improvements
Total(2)
Accumulated
depreciation
and
amortization(1)
Date of
construction
Date
acquired
TOTAL UE
PROPERTIES
Leasehold
Improvements,
Equipment and Other
1,578,317
511,336
1,418,037
736,580
521,669
2,144,288
2,665,957
(586,062)
—
—
—
5,897
—
5,897
5,897
(1,065)
TOTAL
$ 1,578,317
$511,336
$ 1,418,037
$ 742,477
$521,669
$ 2,150,185
$2,671,854
$ (587,127)
(1) Depreciation of the buildings and improvements are calculated over lives ranging from the life of the lease to forty years.
(2) Adjusted tax basis for federal income tax purposes was $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2017.
(3) The Company is a lessee under a ground or building lease. The building will revert to the lessor upon lease expiration.
98
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES AND URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(Amounts in thousands)
The following is a reconciliation of real estate assets and accumulated depreciation:
Real Estate
Balance at beginning of period
Additions during the period:
Land
Buildings & improvements
Construction in progress
Less: Impairments and assets sold or written-off
Balance at end of period
Accumulated Depreciation
Balance at beginning of period
Additions charged to operating expenses
Less: Accumulated depreciation on assets written-off
Balance at end of period
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
2,138,500
$
2,084,642
$
2,022,804
142,305
389,338
34,525
2,704,668
(32,814)
2,671,854
541,077
65,140
606,217
(19,090)
587,127
$
$
$
2,667
18,316
47,234
2,152,859
(14,359)
2,138,500
509,112
42,989
552,101
(11,024)
541,077
$
$
$
10,984
8,840
52,602
2,095,230
(10,588)
2,084,642
467,503
52,197
519,700
(10,588)
509,112
$
$
$
99
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
as of February 14, 2018
EXHIBIT 21.1
Urban Edge Properties, a Maryland real estate investment trust, has only two subsidiaries: Urban Edge Properties LP, a Delaware
limited partnership, and Urban Edge Properties Auto LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation. Below is a list of the direct
and indirect subsidiaries of Urban Edge Properties, and the corresponding states of incorporation or organization:
Name of Subsidiary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Amherst II UE LLC
Bethlehem UE LLC
Bricktown UE LLC
Bricktown UE Member LLC
Cherry Hill UE LLC
Cherry Hill UE Member LLC
Dover UE LLC
Dover UE Member LLC
East Brunswick UE II LLC
East Brunswick UE Owner LLC
Freeport UE LLC
Freeport UE Member LLC
Glen Burnie UE LLC
Hackensack UE LLC
Hackensack UE Member LLC
Hanover UE LLC
Hanover UE Member LLC
Jersey City UE LLC
Jersey City UE Member LLC
Kearny Holding UE LLC
Kearny Leasing UE LLC
Lawnside II UE LLC
Lawnside UE LLC
Lawnside UE Member LLC
Lodi II UE LLC
Lodi II UE Member LLC
Lodi III UE LLC
Lodi UE LLC
Lodi UE Member LLC
Manalapan UE LLC
Manalapan UE Member LLC
Marlton UE LLC
Marlton UE Member LLC
Middletown UE LLC
Middletown UE Member LLC
Montclair UE LLC
Montclair UE Member LLC
State of
Organization
New York
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
New York
Delaware
Maryland
New Jersey
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
New Jersey
New Jersey
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
Morris Plains Holding UE LLC
Morris Plains Holding UE Member LLC
Morris Plains Leasing UE LLC
Morris Plains Leasing UE Member LLC
New Hyde Park UE LLC
New Woodbridge II UE Member LLC
Newington UE LLC
Newington UE Member LLC
North Bergen UE LLC
North Bergen UE Member LLC
North Plainfield UE LLC
North Plainfield UE Member LLC
Paramus UE LLC
Patson UE Holdings LLC
Patson Urban Edge GP LLC
Patson Urban Edge LLC
Springfield Member UE LLC
Springfield UE LLC
Totowa UE LLC
Totowa UE Member LLC
Towson II UE LLC
Towson UE LLC
Towson UE Member LLC
Turnersville UE LLC
UE 1105 State Highway 36 LLC
UE 195 North Bedford Road LLC
UE 197 Spring Valley LLC
UE 2100 Route 38 LLC
UE 2445 Springfield Avenue LLC
UE 3098 Long Beach Road LLC
UE 447 South Broadway LLC
UE 675 Paterson Avenue LLC
UE 675 Route 1 LLC
UE 7000 Hadley Road LLC
UE 713-715 Sunrise LLC
UE 839 New York Avenue LLC
UE 938 Spring Valley LLC
UE AP 195 N. Bedford Road LLC
UE AR Building LLC
UE Bensalem Holding Company LLC
UE Bergen East LLC
UE Bergen Mall 2017 License LLC
UE Bergen Mall License II LLC
UE Bergen Mall LLC
UE Bergen Mall Owner LLC
UE Bethlehem Holding LP
UE Bethlehem Properties Holding Company LLC
UE Bethlehem Property LP
UE Brick LLC
UE Bridgeland Warehouses LLC
New Jersey
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
New York
Delaware
Connecticut
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Massachusetts
New Jersey
Delaware
Delaware
Maryland
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
Pennsylvania
Delaware
Pennsylvania
New Jersey
New Jersey
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
UE Bruckner Plaza LLC
UE Bruckner Shops LLC
UE Burnside Plaza LLC
UE Caguas/Catalinas Holding LLC
UE Caguas/Catalinas Holding LP
UE Caguas/Catalinas Management LLC
UE Camden Holding LLC
UE Catalinas GP Inc.
UE Chicopee Holding LLC
UE Cross Bay LLC
UE Eatontown Seamans Plaza LLC
UE Forest Plaza LLC
UE Forest Plaza Member LLC
UE Gun Hill Road LLC
UE Hanover Public Warehousing LLC
UE Harrison Holding Company LLC
UE Henrietta Holding LLC
UE Holding LP
UE Hudson Mall Holding LLC
UE Hudson Mall Intermediate Holding LLC
UE Hudson Mall LLC
UE Lancaster Leasing Company LLC
UE Lodi Delaware LLC
UE Lodi Delaware Member LLC
UE Management LLC
UE Manchester LLC
UE Marple Holding Company LLC
UE Massachusetts Holding LLC
UE Maywood License LLC
UE Millburn LLC
UE Montehiedra Acquisition LLC
UE Montehiedra Acquisition LP
UE Montehiedra Holding II LP
UE Montehiedra Holding LLC
UE Montehiedra Holding LP
UE Montehiedra Inc.
UE Montehiedra Lender LLC
UE Montehiedra Management LLC
UE Montehiedra OP LLC
UE Montehiedra Out Parcel LLC
UE Mundy Street LP
UE New Bridgeland Warehouses LLC
UE New Hanover LLC
UE New Hanover LLC
UE New Hanover Member LLC
UE New Hanover Public Warehousing LLC
UE New Woodbridge II LLC
UE Norfolk Property LLC
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
Massachusetts
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
New York
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
UE One Lincoln Plaza LLC
UE PA 1 LP
UE PA 10 LP
UE PA 11 LP
UE PA 12 LP
UE PA 13 LP
UE PA 14 LP
UE PA 15 LP
UE PA 16 LP
UE PA 17 LP
UE PA 18 LP
UE PA 19 LP
UE PA 2 LP
UE PA 20 LP
UE PA 21 LP
UE PA 22 LP
UE PA 23 LP
UE PA 24 LP
UE PA 25 LP
UE PA 26 LP
UE PA 27 LP
UE PA 28 LP
UE PA 29 LP
UE PA 3 LP
UE PA 30 LP
UE PA 31 LP
UE PA 32 LP
UE PA 33 LP
UE PA 34 LP
UE PA 35 LP
UE PA 36 LP
UE PA 37 LP
UE PA 38 LP
UE PA 39 LP
UE PA 4 LP
UE PA 40 LP
UE PA 5 LP
UE PA 6 LP
UE PA 7 LP
UE PA 8 LP
UE PA 9 LP
UE PA GP LLC
UE Paramus License LLC
UE Paterson Plank Road LLC
UE Patson LLC
UE Patson Mt. Diablo A LP
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
UE Patson Walnut Creek LP
UE Pennsylvania Holding LLC
UE Philadelphia Holding Company LLC
UE Property Management LLC
UE Retail Management LLC
UE Retail Manager LLC
UE Rochester Holding LLC
UE Rochester Holding Member LLC
UE Rockaway LLC
UE Rockville Acquisition LLC
UE Rockville LLC
UE Second Rochester Holding LLC
UE Second Rochester Holding Member LLC
UE Shoppes on Dean LLC
UE Tonnelle 8701 LLC
UE Tonnelle Commons LLC
UE Tonnelle Storage LLC
UE TRU Alewife Brook Pkwy LLC
UE TRU Baltimore Park LP
UE TRU CA LLC
UE TRU Callahan Drive LP
UE TRU Cherry Avenue LP
UE TRU Erie Blvd LLC
UE TRU Georgia Avenue LLC
UE TRU Jericho Turnpike LLC
UE TRU Leesburg Pike LLC
UE TRU PA LLC
UE TRU Sam Rittenburg Blvd LLC
UE TRU West Sunrise Hwy LLC
UE West Babylon LLC
UE Woodbridge King George LLC
UE Wyomissing Properties LP
UE Yonkers II LLC
UE Yonkers LLC
UE York Holding Company LLC
Union UE LLC
Union UE Member LLC
Urban Edge Bensalem LP
Urban Edge Bethlehem LP
Urban Edge Bethlehem Owner LLC
Urban Edge Caguas GP Inc.
Urban Edge Caguas LP
Urban Edge Catalinas LP
Urban Edge DP LLC
Urban Edge EF Borrower LLC
Urban Edge Harrison LP
Delaware
Pennsylvania
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
New York
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
Delaware
New York
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Pennsylvania
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
Urban Edge Lancaster LP
Urban Edge Marple LP
Urban Edge Mass LLC
Urban Edge Massachusetts Holdings LLC
Urban Edge Montehiedra Mezz Loan LLC
Urban Edge Montehiedra OP LP
Urban Edge Pennsylvania LP
Urban Edge Philadelphia LP
Urban Edge Properties
Urban Edge Properties LP
Urban Edge Properties Auto LLC
Urban Edge York LP
Watchung UE LLC
Watchung UE Member LLC
Waterbury UE LLC
Waterbury UE Member LLC
Wayne UE LLC
Woodbridge UE LLC
Woodbridge UE Member LLC
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Massachusetts
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Maryland
Delaware
Delaware
Pennsylvania
New Jersey
Delaware
Connecticut
Delaware
New Jersey
New Jersey
Delaware
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-212951 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement
No. 333-202125 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 14, 2018, relating to the consolidated and combined financial statements
of Urban Edge Properties, and the effectiveness of Urban Edge Properties’ internal control over financial reporting, appearing in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Urban Edge Properties and Urban Edge Properties LP for the year ended December 31, 2017.
EXHIBIT 23.1
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
February 14, 2018
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-212951 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February
14, 2018, relating to the consolidated and combined financial statements of Urban Edge Properties LP, and the effectiveness of
Urban Edge Properties LP’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Urban
Edge Properties and Urban Edge Properties LP for the year ended December 31, 2017.
EXHIBIT 23.2
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
February 14, 2018
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
EXHIBIT 31.1
I, Jeffrey S. Olson, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Urban Edge Properties;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of trustees (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
February 14, 2018
/s/ Jeffrey S. Olson
Jeffrey S. Olson
Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive
Officer
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
EXHIBIT 31.2
I, Mark Langer, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Urban Edge Properties;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of trustees (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
February 14, 2018
/s/ Mark Langer
Mark Langer
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
EXHIBIT 31.3
I, Jeffrey S. Olson, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Urban Edge Properties LP;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of trustees (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
February 14, 2018
/s/ Jeffrey S. Olson
Jeffrey S. Olson
Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive
Officer of Urban Edge Properties, general partner of
registrant
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
EXHIBIT 31.4
I, Mark Langer, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Urban Edge Properties LP;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of trustees (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
February 14, 2018
/s/ Mark Langer
Mark Langer
Chief Financial Officer of Urban Edge Properties, general partner of
registrant
CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
EXHIBIT 32.1
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code), the undersigned officer of Urban Edge Properties, hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) of Urban Edge Properties fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Urban Edge Properties.
February 14, 2018
/s/ Jeffrey S. Olson
Name: Jeffrey S. Olson
Title: Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive
Officer
February 14, 2018
/s/ Mark Langer
Name: Mark Langer
Title: Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing).
CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 32.2
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Urban Edge Properties, hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) of Urban Edge Properties LP fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Urban Edge Properties LP.
February 14, 2018
February 14, 2018
/s/ Jeffrey S. Olson
Jeffrey S. Olson
Name
:
Title: Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive
Officer of Urban Edge Properties, general partner of
registrant
/s/ Mark Langer
Mark Langer
Name
:
Title: Chief Financial Officer of Urban Edge Properties,
general partner of registrant
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
TRUSTEES
JEFFREY S. OLSON
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Urban Edge Properties
STEVEN ROTH
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Vornado Realty Trust
MICHAEL A. GOULD
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Bloomingdale’s
STEVEN H. GRAPSTEIN
Chief Executive Officer, Como Holdings USA, Inc.
Director, David Yurman
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
STEVEN GUTTMAN
Founder and Principal, Storage Deluxe
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Federal Realty
AMY B. LANE
Director, The TJX Companies Inc.
GNC Holdings, Inc. and NextEra Energy
KEVIN P. O’SHEA
Chief Financial Officer, AvalonBay Communities
JEFFREY S. OLSON
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
JENNIFER HOLMES
Chief Accounting Officer
ROBERT MINUTOLI
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
ROBERT C. MILTON III
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
MARK J. LANGER
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
BERNARD I. SCHACHTER
Executive Vice President – Asset Management
HERBERT EILBERG
Chief Investment Officer
COMPANY DATA
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
American Stock Transfer & Trust Co.
New York, New York
ANNUAL MEETING
The annual meeting of shareholders of Urban Edge
Properties, will be held May 9, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. at
Goodwin Procter LLP, The New York Times
Building, 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018
MICHAEL ZUCKER
Executive Vice President – Leasing
REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Shareholders may obtain a copy of the Company’s
annual report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission free of charge (except
for exhibits), by writing to the Secretary, Urban
Edge Properties, 888 Seventh Avenue, New York,
New York 10019; or, visit the Company’s website
at www.uedge.com and refer to the Company’s
SEC Filings.
888 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
212.956.2555
www.uedge.com