US Physical Therapy Annual Report 2000

Plain-text annual report

On the ball US P H Y S I C A L T H E R A P Y U S P T 2 0 0 0 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 0 B E S T SMALL COMPANIES o n t h e ball is our cult ure of ta king a sph ere a n d la u nc hing it t o Dear Fellow Shareholders- Our unique partnership model, combined with the business acumen of our corporate team, has delivered a stellar performance for 2000. New records were set in patient visits, sales, net income and operating margins. Our longstanding shareholders have been rewarded for their patience with excellent returns as the stock market began to recognize our consistent earnings growth. The Company effected a 2-for-1 stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend in January 2001. We took this action following a significant increase in share price to increase the number of shares in the public float available for trading, to enhance liquidity and broaden ownership. All share and per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the split. Record Net Income Validates Model. Net income was a record $3,735,000 for the year, which was an increase of 56% over the previous year. Diluted earnings per share increased 53% to $0.52. Net revenues for 2000 rose 23.1% to $63,222,000 from $51,368,000 for ROY SPR ADLI N P R E S I D E N T & C E O 1999, due primarily to a 23.2% increase in patient visits in 2000 to 697,000. Same store sales increased 17.2% and same store visits increased 16.7%. I was especially pleased with the strong increase in visits and sales considering the detrimental impact of the December snowstorms in areas where we have clinics. We've estimated that 4,500 visits, or approximately $400,000 in revenues were lost as a result of the inclement weather. Declining Expenses Per Visit Reflect A Focus On The Details. Clinic direct expenses per visit for the year declined to $62.61 from $63.91 in 1999. The decline in expenses per visit was due to the greater availability of therapists, the spreading of fixed expenses over a greater number of patient visits and careful control of costs while maintaining the quality level of patient care. These factors should continue to benefit the Company in 2001, resulting in a further reduction in expenses per visit. For the year 2000, the contribution margin of the clinics was the best in our history at 28.5%, up from 26.8% last year. Corporate office costs as a percent of net revenues declined to 12.0% from 12.6% in the previous year. $90.73 $90.67 $89.46 $85.85 $86.93 $66.15 $65.49 $67.19 $66.44 $64.87 n e t r e v e n u e p e r v i s i t c l i n i c o p e r a t i n g c o s t p e r v i s i t ‘96 ‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 NET REVENUES & CLINIC OPERATING COST PER VISIT t o a pl a ne of differenc e. We do it every day in different ways. 1 3 9 C L I N I C S I N 3 0 S T A T E S A S O F D E C E M B E R 3 1 , 2 0 0 0 ’90 1 ’91 3 ’92 9 ’93 24 ’94 53 ’95 57 ’96 69 ’97 80 ’98 99 ’99 113 ’00 139 CLINIC OPEN CLINICS OPEN CLINICS OPEN CLINICS OPEN CLINICS OPEN CLINICS OPEN CLINICS OPEN CLINICS OPEN CLINICS OPEN CLINICS OPEN CLINICS OPEN Share Repurchase Effected. Recognizing the depressed value of the Company's stock in the first half of the year, the Company repurchased 1,130,000 shares in August 2000, or about 17.2% of the outstanding common stock, at a price of $5.50 per share. The Company utilized cash on hand and borrowed another $2,115,000 to complete the stock repurchase. In November 2000, the Company repaid $1,215,000 of the $2,115,000 borrowed to repurchase the stock, and the remainder was repaid in March 2001. Debt To Equity Improved. In November 2000, $850,000 of subordinated convertible debt was converted by note holders into 145,000 shares of common stock, resulting in a balance of $7,200,000 in subordinated convertible debt on the books as of December 31, 2000. In January 2001, another $4,200,000 of subordinated convertible debt was converted into 798,000 shares of common stock, leaving $3,000,000 still unconverted. The conversion of this debt will not only enhance the Company's debt-to-equity ratio, but will also improve the Company's pre- tax cash flow by approximately $400,000 per year. Strong Openings Portend A Bright Future. Our 28 facility openings last year were divided equally between new partnerships and satellites of existing facilities. Only construction delays resulting from winter storms kept us from eclipsing 1994's record of 29 clinic openings. My goal this year will be to continue accelerating openings with at least 30 new clinics, including satellites of existing partnerships. The satellite clinics generally ramp up faster following opening as we already know the market and have a proven partner. Our "pool" of potential new partners continues to increase as a result of our targeted recruitment, word of mouth and continuing therapist availability. Based upon the actual visits to date in the first quarter and projected visits for the remainder of the year, net earnings in the area of $5.7 million for 2001 seems achievable, which represents a 52.6% gain over 2000. k e e p t h eball moving to pa ss th e competition. Maintaining Appropriate Reimbursement For Services. We have been seeing some positive trends in reimbursement for services in our clinics. Although there continue to be pressures to contain healthcare costs, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 resulted in an increase in our Medicare reimbursement as we transitioned from cost based reimbursement methodology to a fee schedule. Additionally, managed care payors such as HMOs are under pressure to pay providers at a more appropriate level, and we are beginning to realize increases in reimbursement by some managed care payors. This has resulted in a higher net patient revenue per visit of $87.01 in 2000, up from $86.65 in 1999. We continue to maintain a critical eye in accepting only those managed care plans that return a reasonable margin. Through the evaluation of potential contracts, we are diligent in avoiding plans that have insufficient reimbursement for the services we provide. We target more lucrative "fee for service" FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS FOR YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 STATEMENT OF OPERAT IONS DATA (in thous ands, excep t per s hare da ta) Net revenues (1) $63,222 $51,368 $44,837 $38,807 $32,207 Income before income taxes Net income (2) Earnings per common share: Basic (3) Diluted (3) BA LANCE S HEE T DATA $6,138 $3,735 $0.61 $0.52 $3,962 $2,704 $2,481 $1,758 $2,394 $1,596 $2,426 $1,641 $0.35 $0.34 $0.22 $0.21 $0.34 $0.33 $0.23 $0.22 Total assets (1) $22,970 $23,346 $24,362 $22,548 $19,483 Long-term debt, less current portion $7,226 $8,087 $8,126 $8,239 $8,276 Working capital (1) $10,420 $12,493 $12,832 $11,204 $9,214 FINA NCIAL RATI OS Current ratio (1) Long-term debt to total capitalization 4.14 0.46 6.79 0.43 5.45 0.41 5.07 0.45 4.56 0.52 1. Certain amounts for 1999 and 1998 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation used for 2000. The reclassifications had no effect on net income. 2. Prior to 1998, net operating loss carryforwards were utilized to offset any federal income tax liability. 3. All per share information has been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend, payable on January 5, 2001 to holders of record as of December 27, 2000. plans, workers compensation, medicare and PPO patients, while minimizing the low reimbursed HMO and capitated contracts. Partnering With Therapists Is The Difference. Our company has a unique partnership model. The entrepreneurial environment of shared ownership melds the therapists’ existing referral relationships and willingness to market, with our business systems expertise and extensive experience in operating clinics. Our partners are rewarded for their commitment to the partnership with both career stability and personal financial growth. It's having people at the front line pushing the ball forward with us that makes us a different company. Knowing Each Market And Its Customers Drives Our Bottom Line Growth. Developing successful clinics results from precise forecasting that defines the unique situation of every market. It begins with our partner selection process and continues with "due diligence" that evaluates the market. Multiple visits to the community assure an understanding of the market dynamics, including politics, demographics, competition and physician support of our candidate. Our start-up team then tailors each clinic with a "right-sized business plan" that addresses real estate, equipment and staffing. This in-depth process closely matches expectations with actual performance, giving us the confidence to continue to accelerate openings. Our Home-Office People Are A Great Resource. Our partners depend upon our over 65 home-office team members to respond, often on a moment's notice, to the day's challenge or opportunity. We are continually reviewing our corporate infrastructure to ensure the adequate support of existing clinics and the smooth integration of new clinics. In 2000, the Company completed a major upgrade of the payroll and human resources systems to better serve our clinics. The home-office is instrumental in providing guidance in the areas of marketing and sales, accounting, operations, billing and collection, regulatory issues and human resources. b Increased profitability results from focused efforts in several areas. Our business office liaisons assist our partners in monitoring their billings, collections, regulatory compliance and other business issues that therapists may not have the expertise to handle independently. Similarly, our marketing group is mentoring the partners to be "the sales face of their business," thus resulting in greater market share. Another area of focus is our expanded team of Operations Vice Presidents who assist our partners in guiding clinic growth, staffing efficiencies, expansion and day-to-day challenges that were not covered in P.T. school. Each day, our partners mature as business people, using our diverse areas of expertise to improve the operation of their business. * P r i o r c a r r y f o r w a r d s t o o f f s e t f e d e r a l i n c o m e t a x e x p e n s e . t o 1 9 9 8 , t h e C o m p a n y h a d a v a i l a b l e u n u s e d n e t o p e r a t i n g l o s s s t o c k N O T E : 5 , 2 0 0 1 t o h o l d e r s s p l i t e f f e c t e d o f i n r e c o r d a s o f D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 0 0 . t h e f o r m o f a 1 0 0 % s t o c k d i v i d e n d , p a y a b l e o n J a n u a r y P e r s h a r e i n f o r m a t i o n h a s b e e n a d j u s t e d t o r e f l e c t t h e t w o - f o r - o n e f o c u s o n t h e g o a l t h e a n d p u s h ball $.52 $.33 * $.34 $.22 * $.21 ‘96 ‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 DI LUTED EARN I NGS PER COM MON SHARE onward. 5 3 1 , 5 7 3 7 9 3 , 6 4 4 8 7 1 , 1 0 5 2 4 1 , 6 6 5 6 7 2 , 7 9 6 7 0 2 , 2 3 $ 7 0 8 , 8 3 $ 7 3 8 , 4 4 $ 8 6 3 , 1 5 $ 2 2 2 , 3 6 $ ‘96 ‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 ‘96 ‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 PATI E NT VI S I TS N ET R EVE N U E S (in thous ands) g u i d e t h e ball 139 113 99 80 69 ‘96 ‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 N U M B E R O F C L I N I C S i n i t s t r a c k Training Lays The Foundation For Good Managers. We have embarked on human resources training for partners and staff with regard to hiring techniques, motivation and team leadership. We are also increasing the number of participants in our "Master's Institute" marketing and sales training course for our partners. Here, we have seen immediate returns in accelerated growth of patient visits. Decisions Are Fast And Focused. We are opportunistic in how we make decisions and redirect our resources quickly in assessing and implementing opportunities. It requires building on our expertise and addressing the needs of each market. For example, if there is a demand by local industry for treatment of repetitive strain injury, we will recruit a certified hand therapist. When the market demands a late night schedule for those patients that can only come after work or on Saturdays, we will respond. Our competitors may not. Both The Rehab Industry & The Market Recognize Our Value. We continue to achieve the goals I set since joining the company in 1994: increasing shareholder value while maintaining quality patient care. We are now being recognized on both these fronts. Additionally, we've developed a solid reputation for our professional ethics and quality clinical operations. This has resulted in a growing number of qualified clinicians now desiring to partner with us. Similarly, in the financial community, many respected entities have begun to notice our success, 8 5 7 , 1 $ 1 8 4 , 2 $ 4 0 7 , 2 $ 2 6 9 , 3 $ 8 3 1 , 6 $ ‘96 ‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 I N C O M E B E F O R E I N C O M E TA X E S (i n t housa nds) 8 3 2 , 4 $ 2 0 1 , 5 $ 5 0 5 , 5 $ 9 7 7 , 6 $ 9 4 2 , 9 $ ‘96 ‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 E B IT DA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) (in thous ands) t o a v o i d d i s t r a c t i o n s . including Forbes Magazine who in October 2000 recognized us as one of the "200 Best Small Companies." In closing, I would like to extend my gratitude to our long- standing director, Richard C.W. Mauran. Rick resigned from the Board of Directors in February 2001. Understandably, he decided to reallocate time to his many global interests. On behalf of his fellow board members, I thank Rick for his insight, advice and commitment. Everyday is a new game. Everyday we wake up and the ball gets tossed in the air again. We are committed to being respectful of the opportunity and the trust you have placed before our team. Thank you. Roy W. Spradlin President & Chief Executive Officer D I R E CTO R S J. Livingston Kosberg CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD Mark J. Brookner VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD Roy W. Spradlin PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Daniel C. Arnold PRIVATE INVESTOR Bruce D. Broussard CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER - US ONCOLOGY James B. Hoover FOUNDING MANAGING PARTNER - DAUPHIN CAPITAL PARTNERS Marlin W. Johnston HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES CONSULTANT - TONN & ASSOCIATES Albert L. Rosen FORMER GENERAL MANAGER, SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS PRIVATE INVESTOR RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA be on the ball. MANAG E M E NT J. Livingston Kosberg CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD Mark J. Brookner VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD Roy W. Spradlin PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Michael L. Lang SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT J. Michael Mullin CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Stephen Rosenbloom SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT SHAREHOLDERS’ I N FORMATION Information Request Investors, analysts and others seeking financial information should contact: J. Michael Mullin, Chief Financial Officer 713.297.7000 Form 10-Q Copies of the Company’s Form 10-Q and quarterly press release are available by writing the Company Attention: Dorothy Flato, Corporate Secretary or via the Company’s website at www.usphysicaltherapy.com Corporate Headquarters U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. 3040 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 222 Houston, Texas 77056 713.297.7000 Corporate Counsel Mayor, Day, Caldwell & Keeton, L.L.P. 700 Louisiana, Suite 1900 Houston, Texas 77002-2778 Independent Accountants KPMG LLP 700 Louisiana Houston, Texas 77002 Shareholder Services Shareholders desiring to change the name, address or ownership of stock, to report lost certificates or to consolidate accounts, should contact U.S. Physical Therapy’s transfer agent: Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company 2 Broadway New York, New York 10004 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 (Mark One) ≤ ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FORM 10-K/A For the ﬁscal year ended December 31, 2000 n TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission ﬁle number 1-11151 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. (Name of registrant as speciﬁed in its charter) Nevada (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 3040 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 222, Houston, Texas (Address of principal executive ofﬁces) 76-0364866 (I.R.S. Employer Identiﬁcation No.) 77056 (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713) 297-7000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: Not Applicable Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $.01 par value (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) ﬁled all reports required to be ﬁled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to ﬁle such reports), and (2) has been subject to such ﬁling requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ≤ No n Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent ﬁlers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in deﬁnitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. n As of March 26, 2001, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-afﬁliates of the registrant was: $57,122,000 As of March 26, 2001, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, par value $.01 per share, was: 6,622,016 Documents Incorporated by Reference Portions of Deﬁnitive Proxy Statement for the 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders PART III Document Part of Form 10-K Forward Looking Statements We make statements in this report that are considered to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those we project. When used in this report, the words ‘‘anticipates,’’ ‘‘believes,’’ ‘‘estimates,’’ ‘‘intends,’’ ‘‘expects,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘should’’ and ‘‘goal’’ and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are based on the Company’s current views and assump- tions and involve risks and uncertainties that include, among other things: ) general economic, business, and regulatory conditions discussed under the headings ‘‘Sources of Revenue/ Reimbursement’’ and ‘‘Factors Affecting Future Results’’ below; ) competition discussed under the heading ‘‘Competition’’ below; ) federal and state regulations discussed under the heading ‘‘Regulation and Healthcare Reform’’ below; ) availability, terms, and use of capital discussed under the heading ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ below; and ) weather. Some or all of these factors are beyond the Company’s control. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Please see the other sections of this report and our other periodic reports ﬁled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘SEC’’) for more information on these factors. These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as the result of actual results, changes in assumptions, new information, future events, or otherwise. Item 1. Business. General PART I U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) operates outpatient physical and occupational therapy clinics which provide post-operative care and treatment for a variety of orthopedic-related disorders and sports-related injuries. At December 31, 2000, the Company operated 139 outpatient physical and occupational therapy clinics in 30 states. The average age of the 139 clinics in operation at December 31, 2000 was 3.78 years. Since the inception of the Company, 146 clinics have been developed and six clinics have been acquired by the Company. To date, the Company has closed eight facilities due to adverse clinic performance, consolidated the operations of three of its clinics with other existing clinics to more efﬁciently serve various geographic markets and sold certain ﬁxed assets at two of the Company’s clinics, which facilities it then closed. The Company opened 28 new clinics in 2000. Management’s goal for 2001 is to open between 30 and 35 clinics. The clinics provide post-operative care and treatment for a variety of orthopedic-related disorders and sports- related injuries, treatment for neurologically-related injuries, rehabilitation of injured workers and preventative care. Each clinic’s staff typically includes one or more licensed physical and/or occupational therapists and ofﬁce personnel, and may also include physical and/or occupational therapy assistants, aides, exercise physiologists and athletic trainers. The clinics perform a tailored and comprehensive evaluation of each patient which is followed by a treatment plan speciﬁc to the injury. The treatment plan may include the use of modalities and procedures such as ultrasound, electrical stimulation, hot packs, iontophoresis, therapeutic exercise, manual therapy techniques, education on management of daily life skills and home exercise programs. The clinics’ business primarily originates from physician referrals. The principal sources of payment for the clinics’ services are commercial health insurance, workers’ compensation insurance, managed care programs, Medicare and proceeds from personal injury cases. The Company’s strategy is to develop and acquire outpatient clinics on a national basis. 1 The Company’s development strategy is to attract physical and occupational therapists who have established relationships with physicians by offering them the opportunity to acquire a partnership interest in a new clinic to be developed by the Company. In addition, the therapist partner receives a competitive salary and bonus based on his or her clinic’s net revenue and proﬁtability. The Company is presently engaged in discussions with several prospective therapist partners. In addition to the Company’s partnership program, it also manages physical therapy facilities for third parties, including physicians, with seven such third-party facilities under the Company’s management as of December 31, 2000. In March 2000, the Company decided to discontinue its surgery center initiative which originally began in 1999. Costs incurred related to the surgery center initiative, including severance beneﬁts for terminated employees, totaled $369,000 and $384,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. On January 5, 2001, the Company effected a two-for-one common stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend to stockholders of record as of December 27, 2000. All share and per share amounts contained herein have been adjusted to reﬂect the effect of the stock split. The Company was formed in June 1990 and operated as a subchapter S Corporation until August 1991 when it reorganized into a limited partnership form of organization. In May 1992, in connection with the Company’s initial public offering, the Company was reorganized into its present form, a Nevada corporation with operating subsidiaries organized in the form of limited partnerships. In such reorganization, the prior owners of the limited partnership interests and the corporate general partner corporations exchanged their interests for the Company’s common stock. In June 1993, the Company completed the issuance and sale at par in a private placement of $3,050,000 of 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes due June 30, 2003 (the ‘‘Initial Series Notes’’). In May 1994, the Company completed the issuance and sale at par in a private placement of $2,000,000 of 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes, Series B due June 30, 2004 (the ‘‘Series B Notes’’) and $3,000,000 of 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes, Series C due June 30, 2004 (the ‘‘Series C Notes,’’ and collectively, the Initial Series Notes, the Series B Notes and the Series C Notes are hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Convertible Subordinated Notes’’). The Convertible Subordinated Notes are convertible at the option of the holders thereof into the number of whole shares of Company common stock determined by dividing the principal amount of the notes so converted by $5.00 (in the case of the Initial Series Notes and the Series C Notes) or $6.00 (in the case of the Series B Notes), subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. During 2000, $850,000 of the Convertible Subordinated Notes were converted by the note holders into 144,998 shares of common stock, resulting in a balance of $7,200,000 in Convertible Subordinated Notes at December 31, 2000. In January 2001, an additional $650,000 was converted by a note holder into 130,000 shares of common stock and the Company exercised its right under the Initial Series Notes and the Series B Notes to require conversion of the remaining $3,550,000 into 668,332 shares of common stock. The Series C Notes do not contain a mandatory conversion feature and currently remain outstanding. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Form 10-K to the Company include the Company and all its subsidiaries. The Company’s principal executive ofﬁces are located at 3040 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 222, Houston, Texas 77056, and its telephone number is (713) 297-7000. The Company’s Clinics In general, the managing physical and/or occupational therapist of each clinic owns a partnership interest in the clinic he or she operates. For the majority of the clinics, this is accomplished by structuring the clinic as a separate limited partnership (the ‘‘Clinic Partnerships’’). As of December 31, 2000, the Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, owned a 1% general partnership interest, with the exception of one clinic in which the Company owned a 6% general partnership interest, and limited partnership interests ranging from 49% to 99% in the clinics it operates (with respect to 90% of the Company’s clinics, the Company owned a limited partnership interest of 64% as of December 31, 2000). For the majority of the clinics, the managing therapist of each such clinic, along with other therapists at the clinic in several of the partnerships, own the remaining limited partnership interests in the clinic. In 2 some instances, the Company develops satellite clinic facilities which are extensions of existing clinics, and thus, Clinic Partnerships may consist of one or more clinic locations. In the majority of the partnership agreements, the therapist partner begins with a 20% proﬁt interest in his or her Clinic Partnership which increases by 3% at the end of each year until his or her interest reaches 35%. The therapist partners have no interest in net losses of Clinic Partnerships, except to the extent of their capital accounts. The Company presently anticipates that future clinics developed by the Company will be structured in a comparable manner. In addition, typically each therapist partner enters into an employment agreement with the Company providing for a covenant not to compete during his or her employment with the Company plus one to two years thereafter. The terms of the employment agreements range from two to ﬁve years. Pursuant to each employment agreement, the therapist partner receives a base salary and a bonus based on the net revenues or operating proﬁt generated by his or her Clinic Partnership. Each employment agreement provides that the therapist partner can be required to sell his or her partnership interest in the Clinic Partnership for the amount of his or her capital account upon termination of employment with the Clinic Partnership before the expiration of the initial term of employment. The employment agreements contain no provisions requiring the purchase by the Company of the therapist partner’s interest in the Clinic Partnership in the event of death or disability, or after the initial term of employment. The Company’s business plan is to have each clinic maintain an independent local identity, while at the same time enjoying the beneﬁts of national purchasing, third-party payor contracts and centralized management controls. Pursuant to a management agreement, U.S. PT Management, Ltd. (‘‘USPTM’’), a Texas limited partnership owned indirectly by the Company, provides a variety of services to each clinic, including supervision of site selection, construction, clinic design and equipment selection, establishment of accounting systems and procedures and training of ofﬁce support personnel, management oversight of operations, ongoing accounting services and marketing support. The Company’s typical clinic occupies approximately 1,500 to 4,000 square feet of space under a lease in an ofﬁce building or shopping center. The Company seeks to obtain leases for its clinics at ground level (although it may not always be successful in obtaining such leases) in order to make access to its clinics as easy as possible for patients. The Company also attempts to make the decor in its clinics less institutional and more aesthetically pleasing than hospital clinics. The typical staff needed to operate a clinic in its initial stages is a licensed physical and/or occupational therapist and an ofﬁce manager. Stafﬁng may also include physical and/or occupational therapy assistants, aides, exercise physiologists and athletic trainers. As patient visits grow, the stafﬁng may be increased to include two or more additional licensed physical and/or occupational therapists and one or two additional ofﬁce personnel. All therapy services provided are performed under the direct supervision of a licensed physical and/or occupational therapist. The Company currently provides its services at its clinics only on an outpatient basis. Patients requiring these types of services are usually treated for approximately one hour per day, two to ﬁve times a week. This form of treatment typically lasts two to six weeks. The Company’s charge for the treatment is generally on a per procedure basis. In addition to the services mentioned, the clinics will, when appropriate, develop individual maintenance exercise programs to be continued after treatment. Advice on postural improvements and changes in work habits or lifestyle is provided to promote self-management of the patient’s condition. The Company continues to assess the potential for developing new services and expanding the method of providing its current services, with an emphasis on health insurance and workers’ compensation insurance cost containment. Industry Background Physical and occupational therapy is the process of aiding in the rehabilitation of individuals disabled by injury or disease or recovering from surgery. Management believes that the following factors are inﬂuencing the growth of outpatient physical and occupational therapy services: Economic Beneﬁts of Physical and Occupational Therapy Services. Purchasers and providers of healthcare services, such as insurance companies, health maintenance organizations, businesses and industries, are seeking ways to save on traditional healthcare services. Management believes physical and occupational therapy services are cost-effective by 3 helping to prevent short-term disabilities from becoming chronic conditions, and by speeding the recovery from surgery and musculoskeletal injuries. Earlier Hospital Discharge. Changes in health insurance reimbursement, both public and private, have en- couraged the early discharge of patients in order to contain and reduce costs. Management believes early hospital discharge practices foster greater numbers of individuals requiring outpatient physical and occupational therapy services. Aging Population. The elderly population, which has experienced rapid growth over the past several decades, has a greater incidence of major disability. This growth has fueled the demand for rehabilitation services. Marketing On a local basis, the Company focuses its marketing efforts on physicians, mainly orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, physiatrists, occupational medicine and general practitioners, which generally account for the majority of physical and occupational therapy referrals. In marketing to the physician community, the clinics emphasize their commitment to quality patient care and communication with physicians regarding patient progress. On a national level, the Company employs marketing personnel to assist the clinic directors in establishing referral relationships with health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, industry and case managers and insurance companies for clinic therapy services, as well as to develop and implement marketing plans for marketing to the physician community. Sources of Revenue/Reimbursement Payor sources for clinic services are primarily commercial health insurance, managed care programs, workers’ compensation insurance, Medicare and proceeds from personal injury cases. Commercial health insurance and managed care programs generally provide outpatient services coverage to patients utilizing the clinics, and the patient is normally required to pay an annual deductible and a co-insurance payment. Workers’ compensation is a statutorily deﬁned employee beneﬁt which varies on a state-by-state basis. Workers’ compensation laws generally require employers to pay for employees’ costs of medical rehabilitation, lost wages, legal fees and other costs associated with work-related injuries and disabilities and, in certain jurisdictions, mandatory vocational rehabilitation. These statutes generally require that these beneﬁts be offered to employees without any deductibles, co-payments or cost sharing. Companies may provide such coverage to their employees through either the purchase of insurance from private insurance companies, participation in state-run funds or through self-insurance. Treatments for patients who are parties to personal injury cases are generally paid for from the proceeds of settlements with insurance companies or from favorable judgements. If an unfavorable judgement is received, collection efforts are generally not pursued against the patient and the patient’s account is written off against established reserves. Bad debt reserves relating to personal injury accounts receivable are regularly reviewed and adjusted as appropriate. The Company’s business depends to a signiﬁcant extent on its relationships with physicians, commercial health insurers, workers’ compensation insurers, and other referral sources, such as health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations. If clinics are located in certain geographical areas, it is important for them to be approved as providers by certain key health maintenance organizations and preferred provider plans. If these clinics do not obtain such approval, or if they cannot maintain such approval, the Company could be adversely affected. As of December 31, 2000, 112 of the Company’s clinics have been certiﬁed as rehabilitation agencies by Medicare and 14 additional clinics have individual therapists certiﬁed by Medicare to provide services as physical therapists in private practice. Management anticipates that, in the future, newly developed clinics will generally elect to become certiﬁed as Medicare providers. No assurance can be given that the newly developed clinics will be successful in becoming certiﬁed as Medicare providers. Prior to 1999, Medicare reimbursement for outpatient physical and occupational therapy services furnished by a Medicare-certiﬁed rehabilitation agency was based on a cost reimbursement methodology. The Company was reimbursed at a tentative rate with ﬁnal settlement determined after submission of an annual cost report by the Company and audits thereof by the Medicare ﬁscal intermediary. Effective in 1999, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (‘‘BBA’’) provides that reimbursement for outpatient therapy services provided to Medicare beneﬁciaries is pursuant 4 to a fee schedule published by the Department of Health and Human Services (‘‘HHS’’), and the total amount paid by Medicare in any one year for outpatient physical (including speech-language pathology) or occupational therapy to any one patient is limited to $1,500, except for services provided in hospitals. On November 29, 1999, President Clinton signed into law the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Balanced Budget Reﬁnement Act of 1999 (‘‘BBRA’’) which, among other provisions, placed a two-year moratorium on the $1,500 reimbursement limit for therapy services provided in 2000 and 2001. On December 21, 2000, the President signed into law the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Beneﬁts Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 (‘‘BIPA’’) which, among other provisions, extended the moratorium for one year through December 31, 2002. Medicare regulations require that a physician certify the need for physical and/or occupational therapy services for each patient and that these services be provided in accordance with an established plan of treatment which is periodically revised. State Medicaid programs generally do not provide coverage for outpatient physical or occupa- tional therapy, and, therefore, Medicaid is not, nor is it expected to be, a material payor for the Company. Regulation and Healthcare Reform The healthcare industry is subject to numerous federal, state and local regulations. Certain states into which the Company may expand have laws that require facilities that employ health professionals and provide health-related services to be licensed and, in some cases, to obtain a certiﬁcate of need. Pursuant to certiﬁcate of need laws, the affected entity is required to demonstrate to a state regulatory authority the need for and ﬁnancial feasibility of certain expenditures related to such activities as the construction of new facilities or the commencement of new healthcare services. Based on its operating experience to date, the Company believes that its business, as presently conducted, does not require certiﬁcates of need or other facility approvals or licenses. There can be no assurance, however, that existing laws or regulations will not be interpreted or modiﬁed to require the Company to obtain such approvals or licenses and, if so, that such approvals or licenses could be obtained. Failure to obtain any required certiﬁcates, approvals or licenses could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, ﬁnancial condition and results of operations. As of December 31, 2000, 112 of the Company’s clinics have been certiﬁed as rehabilitation agencies by Medicare and 14 additional clinics have individual therapists certiﬁed by Medicare to provide services as physical therapists in private practice. In order to receive Medicare reimbursement, a rehabilitation agency or the individual therapist must meet the applicable conditions of participation set forth by HHS relating to the type of facility, its equipment, record keeping, personnel and standards of medical care, as well as compliance with all state and local laws. Clinics are subject to periodic inspections or surveys to determine compliance. Various Federal and state laws regulate the relationships between providers of healthcare services and physicians. These laws include Section 1128B(b) of the Social Security Act (the ‘‘Fraud and Abuse Law’’), under which civil and criminal penalties can be imposed upon persons who pay or receive remuneration in return for referrals of patients who are eligible for reimbursement under the Medicare or Medicaid programs. The Company does not believe its business arrangements are out of compliance with these provisions. The provisions are broadly written and the full extent of their application is not currently known. In 1991, the Ofﬁce of the Inspector General (‘‘OIG’’) of the United States Department of Health and Human Services issued regulations describing compensation arrangements which are not viewed as illegal remuneration under the Fraud and Abuse Law (the ‘‘1991 Safe Harbor Rules’’). The 1991 Safe Harbor Rules created certain standards (‘‘Safe Harbors’’) which, if fully complied with, assure participants that a particular business arrangement is not: (a) a criminal offense under the Fraud and Abuse Law, (b) the basis for an exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs or (c) the basis for imposition of civil sanctions. Failure to fall within a Safe Harbor does not constitute a violation of the Fraud and Abuse Law; however, the OIG has indicated that failure to fall within a Safe Harbor may subject an arrangement to increased scrutiny. The Fraud and Abuse Law limits the relationships which the Company may have with referral sources. The Company’s business of managing physician-owned physical therapy facilities is subject to Fraud and Abuse Law issues. According to the OIG’s advisory opinion No. 98-4, these business arrangements fall outside the scope of the Safe Harbors. Currently, federal courts provide little guidance as to the application of the Fraud and Abuse Law to such arrangements. Management considers these issues in planning its clinics, marketing and other activities, and believes its operations are in compliance with applicable law, but no assurance can be given regarding compliance in 5 any particular factual situation. In the event that management contracts of the type to which the Company is a party are held to violate the Fraud and Abuse Law, such holding could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, ﬁnancial condition and results of operations. In February 2000, the OIG issued a special fraud alert regarding the rental of space in physician ofﬁces by persons or entities to which the physicians refer. The OIG is concerned that in such arrangements, the rental payments may be disguised kickbacks to the physician-landlords to induce referrals. The Fraud and Abuse Law prohibits knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying anything of value to induce referrals of items or services payable by a federal healthcare program. Currently, eight clinics rent space from referring physicians. The Company has taken the steps that it believes are necessary to assure that all leases comply with the space rental Safe Harbor to the Fraud and Abuse Law. When the lease meets all of the criteria of a Safe Harbor, the arrangement is immune from prosecution under the Fraud and Abuse Law. The Company believes its operations are in compliance with the current requirements of applicable federal and state law, but no assurances can be given that a federal or state agency charged with enforcement of the Fraud and Abuse Law and similar laws might not assert an adverse position or new interpretation of existing laws that could have a material adverse effect on its business. The federal law known as the ‘‘Stark II’’ provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (the ‘‘Stark Law’’) amended the federal Medicare statute to prohibit referrals by a physician for ‘‘designated health services,’’ including physical therapy and occupational therapy, to an entity in which the physician (or family member) has an investment interest or other ﬁnancial relationship, subject to certain exceptions. This prohibition took effect on January 1, 1995. This law also prohibits billing for services rendered pursuant to a prohibited referral. Penalties for violation include denial of payment for the services, signiﬁcant civil monetary penalties, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Several states have enacted laws similar to the Stark Law, but these state laws cover all (not just Medicare and Medicaid) patients; and many healthcare reform proposals in the last few years would have expanded the Stark Law to cover all patients as well. The Stark Law covers a management contract with a physician group and any ﬁnancial relationship between the Company and referring physicians, including any ﬁnancial transaction resulting from a clinic acquisition. As with the Fraud and Abuse Law, management considers the Stark Law in planning its clinics, marketing and other activities, and believes that its operations are in compliance with applicable law. However, as noted above, no assurance can be given regarding compliance in any particular factual situation. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act In an effort to combat healthcare fraud, Congress included several anti-fraud measures in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (‘‘HIPAA’’). HIPAA amends existing criminal legislation and criminal penalties for Medicare fraud and enacts new federal healthcare anti-fraud legislation. HIPAA creates a source of funding for fraud control divided between HHS and the Department of Justice and is used to coordinate federal, state and local healthcare law enforcement programs, conduct investigations, provide guidance to the healthcare industry on fraudulent healthcare practices, and establish a national data bank to receive and report ﬁnal adverse actions. The Company cannot predict what effect, if any, these expanded enforcement authorities will have on the healthcare industry generally or on the Company’s business. Additionally, HIPAA mandates the adoption of certain standards regarding the exchange of electronic healthcare information in an effort to ensure the privacy and security of patient information. HIPAA’s security and privacy ﬁnal regulations were released by HHS on December 28, 2000; however, these regulations are currently under review and will not be ﬁnalized until April 14, 2001. Once the regulations are ﬁnalized, the Company will have two years to comply. Sanctions for failing to comply with HIPAA include criminal penalties and civil sanctions. The Company is evaluating the impact of HIPAA. At this time, the Company anticipates that it will be able to fully comply with the HIPAA requirements that have been adopted. Since the HIPAA regulations have not yet been ﬁnalized, the Company cannot at this time estimate the cost of such compliance. Based on its current knowledge, the Company believes that the cost of its compliance will not have a material adverse effect on its business, ﬁnancial condition or results of operations. 6 Political, economic and regulatory inﬂuences are subjecting the healthcare industry in the United States to fundamental change. The Company anticipates that Congress, state legislatures and the private sector will continue to review and assess alternative healthcare delivery and payment systems. Potential approaches that have been considered include mandated basic healthcare beneﬁts, controls on healthcare spending through limitations on the growth of private health insurance premiums and Medicare and Medicaid spending, the creation of large insurance purchasing groups, price controls and other fundamental changes to the healthcare delivery system. Managed care entities, which represent an ever-growing percentage of healthcare payors, are demanding lower costs from healthcare providers, and in many cases, requiring or encouraging providers to accept capitated payments that may not be adequate to allow providers to cover their full costs or may reduce their proﬁtability. Legislative debate is expected to continue in the future and market forces are expected to demand reduced costs. The Company cannot predict what impact the adoption of any federal or state healthcare reform measures or future private sector reform may have on its business. Competition The healthcare industry, generally, and the physical and occupational therapy businesses, in particular, are highly competitive and subject to continual changes in the manner in which services are delivered and in which providers are selected. The competitive factors in the physical and occupational therapy businesses include, without limitation, quality of care, cost, treatment outcomes, convenience of location, and relationships with and ability to meet the needs of referral and payor sources. The Company’s clinics compete directly or indirectly with the physical and occupational therapy departments of acute care hospitals, physician-owned therapy clinics, private therapy clinics and chiropractors. The Company believes that its main sources of competition are acute care hospital outpatient therapy clinics and private therapy clinic organizations that provide therapy services. The Company will face further competition as consolidation of the therapy industry continues through the acquisition of physician-owned and other privately- owned therapy practices. Management believes that providing the key therapists with an opportunity to participate in clinic ownership is a competitive advantage because it helps to ensure commitment by local management to the success of the clinic and minimizes turnover of managing therapists. The Company also believes its competitive position is enhanced by its strategy of locating its clinics, when possible, on the ground ﬂoor in ofﬁce buildings and shopping centers with nearby parking, thereby making the clinics more easily accessible to patients. The Company attempts to make the decor in its clinics less institutional and more aesthetically pleasing than hospital clinics. Management also believes it can generally provide its services at a lesser cost than comparable services of hospitals due to hospitals’ higher overhead. Employees At December 31, 2000, the Company employed 1,056 total employees, of which 610 were full-time employees. At that date, none of the Company’s employees were subject to collective bargaining agreements or were members of unions. Management considers the relations between the Company and its employees to be good. In the states in which the Company’s current clinics are located, persons performing physical and occupational therapy services are required to be licensed by the state. All persons currently employed by the Company and its clinics who are required to be licensed are licensed, and the Company intends that all future employees who are required to be licensed will be licensed. Management is not aware of any federal licensing requirements applicable to its employees. Insurance The Company maintains professional liability coverage on professionals employed in each of its clinics, in addition to general liability insurance and coverage for the customary risks inherent in the operation of healthcare facilities and businesses in general. Management believes its insurance policies in force to be adequate in amount and coverage for its current operations. 7 Item 2. Properties. The Company presently leases, under noncancellable operating leases with terms ranging from one to ﬁve years, all of the properties used for its clinics with the exception of two clinics located in Brownwood, Texas and Mineral Wells, Texas, for which the Company owns the buildings. The Company also owns a building in Clovis, New Mexico, which it intends to sell or lease, related to a clinic closed in 2000. The Company intends, where feasible, to lease the premises in which new clinics will be located. The Company’s typical clinic occupies approximately 1,500 to 4,000 square feet of space. The Company also leases, under a noncancellable operating lease expiring in July 2003, its executive ofﬁces located in Houston, Texas. The executive ofﬁces currently occupy approximately 18,726 square feet of space (including allocations for common areas). Item 3. Legal Proceedings. The Company is subject to litigation and other proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While the ultimate outcome of lawsuits or other proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not believe the impact of such lawsuits or other proceedings, if any, would be material to the Company’s business, ﬁnancial condition or results of operations. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders of the Company, through solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of 2000. Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters. Price Quotations PART II The Company’s common stock trades on the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’) National Market under the symbol ‘‘USPH.’’ The range of Nasdaq reported trading prices for each quarterly period, as set forth below, reﬂect the two-for-one stock split effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend, payable on January 5, 2001, to holders of record as of December 27, 2000. The reported quotations reﬂect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark- down or commission and may not represent actual transactions. Quarter First *********************************** Second ********************************* Third ********************************** Fourth ********************************* 2000 1999 High Low High Low $4.984 5.375 7.875 12.688 $4.125 4.375 5.188 6.875 $4.750 4.688 4.719 4.813 $3.750 3.750 3.875 3.625 Record Holders As of March 12, 2001, there were 43 holders of record of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Dividends Since inception, the Company has not declared or paid cash dividends or made distributions on its equity securities (other than as described in the next paragraph), and the Company does not anticipate that it will pay cash dividends or make distributions in the foreseeable future. On January 5, 2001, the Company effected a two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend to stockholders of record as of December 27, 2000. 8 Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities There were no sales of unregistered securities during the quarter ended December 31, 2000. Item 6. Selected Financial Data. Net revenues(1) **************************** Income before income taxes ****************** Net income(2)***************************** Earnings per common share: Basic(3) ******************************** Diluted(3) ****************************** Total assets(1) ***************************** Long-term debt, less current portion *********** Working capital(1) ************************* Current ratio(1)**************************** Long-term debt to total capitalization ********** 2000 $63,222 $ 6,138 $ 3,735 0.61 $ $ 0.52 $22,970 $ 7,226 $10,420 4.14 0.46 Year Ended December 31, 1997 1998 1999 (in thousands, except per share data) $44,837 $ 2,704 $ 1,596 $51,368 $ 3,962 $ 2,394 $38,807 $ 2,481 $ 2,426 0.35 $ $ 0.34 $23,346 $ 8,087 $12,493 6.79 0.43 0.22 $ $ 0.21 $24,362 $ 8,126 $12,832 5.45 0.41 0.34 $ $ 0.33 $22,548 $ 8,239 $11,204 5.07 0.45 1996 $32,207 $ 1,758 $ 1,641 0.23 $ $ 0.22 $19,483 $ 8,276 $ 9,214 4.56 0.52 (1) Certain amounts for 1999 and 1998 have been reclassiﬁed to conform to the presentation used for 2000. The reclassiﬁcations had no effect on net income. (2) Prior to 1998, net operating loss carryforwards were utilized to offset any federal income tax liability. (3) All per share information has been adjusted to reﬂect the two-for-one stock split effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend, payable on January 5, 2001 to holders of record as of December 27, 2000. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Overview The Company operates outpatient physical and/or occupational therapy clinics which provide post-operative care and treatment for a variety of orthopedic-related disorders and sports-related injuries. At December 31, 2000, the Company operated 139 outpatient physical and/or occupational therapy clinics in 30 states. The average age of the 139 clinics in operation at December 31, 2000 was 3.78 years. Since the inception of the Company, 146 clinics have been developed and six clinics have been acquired by the Company. To date, the Company has closed eight facilities due to adverse clinic performance, consolidated the operations of three of its clinics with other existing clinics to more efﬁciently serve various geographic markets and closed two of the Company’s clinics after selling certain ﬁxed assets at such facilities. The closure of one of the Company’s clinics, due to adverse clinic performance, occurred during 1998. See ‘‘Loss on Closure of Facility’’ for additional information. During 1999, three clinics were closed with no loss being recognized related to these closures. These three clinics combined accounted for net patient revenues and clinic operating costs for the year ended December 31, 1999 of $263,000 and $333,000, respectively, and for the year ended December 31, 1998 of $815,000 and $728,000, respectively. Two clinics were closed in 2000 with no loss being recognized. These two clinics combined accounted for net patient revenues and clinic operating costs for the year ended December 31, 2000 of $97,000 and 221,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 1999 of $222,000 and $328,000, respectively, and for the year ended December 31, 1998 of $211,000 and $228,000, respectively. In addition to the Company’s partnership program, it also manages physical therapy facilities for third parties, including physicians, with seven such third-party facilities under management as of December 31, 2000. 9 Fiscal Year 2000 Compared to Fiscal Year 1999 Net Patient Revenues Net patient revenues increased to $60,667,000 for 2000 from $49,056,000 for 1999, an increase of $11,611,000, or 24%, on a 23% increase in patient visits to 697,000. Net patient revenues from the 28 clinics opened during 2000 (the ‘‘2000 New Clinics’’) accounted for 27% of the increase, or $3,144,000. The remaining increase of $8,467,000 in net patient revenues is attributable to those 111 clinics opened before 2000 (the ‘‘Mature Clinics’’). Of the $8,467,000 increase in net patient revenues from the Mature Clinics, $8,215,000 was due to a 17% increase in the number of patient visits to 661,000, while $252,000 was due to an increase in the average net revenue per visit to $87.03. Net patient revenues are based on established billing rates less allowances and discounts for patients covered by worker’s compensation programs and other contractual programs. Payments received under these programs are based on predetermined rates and are generally less than the established billing rates of the clinics. Net patient revenues reﬂect reserves, which are evaluated quarterly by management, for contractual and other adjustments relating to patient discounts from certain payors. Prior to January 1, 1999, Medicare reimbursement for outpatient physical and occupational therapy services furnished by clinics was based on a cost reimbursement methodology. The Company was reimbursed at a tentative rate with ﬁnal settlement determined after submission of an annual cost report by the Company and audits thereof by the Medicare ﬁscal intermediary. Effective in 1999, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 provides that reimbursement for outpatient therapy services provided to Medicare beneﬁciaries is pursuant to a fee schedule published by the Department of Health and Human Services, and the total amount that may be paid by Medicare in any one year for outpatient physical (including speech-language pathology) or occupational therapy to any one patient is limited to $1,500, except for services provided in hospitals. On November 29, 1999, President Clinton signed into law the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Balanced Budget Reﬁnement Act of 1999 which, among other provisions, placed a two-year moratorium on the $1,500 reimbursement limit for therapy services provided in 2000 and 2001. On December 21, 2000, the President signed into law the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Beneﬁts Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 which, among other provisions, extended the moratorium for one year through December 31, 2002. Medicare regulations require that a physician certify the need for physical and/or occupational therapy services for each patient and that these services be provided in accordance with an established plan of treatment which is periodically revised. State Medicaid programs generally do not provide coverage for outpatient physical or occupa- tional therapy, and, therefore, Medicaid is not, nor is it expected to be, a material payor for the Company. Management Contract Revenues Management contract revenues increased to $2,369,000 for 2000 from $2,112,000 for 1999, an increase of $257,000, or 12%. Approximately $117,000 of the increase, or 46%, was due to a new management contract entered into in March 2000. The remaining 54% increase, or $140,000, was primarily due to a 9% increase in patient visits for management contracts entered into prior to 2000. Other Revenues Other revenues consisting of interest, sublease and real estate commission income decreased to $186,000 for 2000 from $200,000 for 1999, a decrease of $14,000, or 7%. The decrease was primarily due to a sublease agreement that was terminated in 1999, offset, in part, by an increase in real estate commission income. Clinic Operating Costs Clinic operating costs as a percent of net patient revenues and management contract revenues combined decreased to 72% for 2000 from 74% for 1999. Clinic Operating Costs — Salaries and Related Costs Salaries and related costs increased to $28,683,000 for 2000 from $23,995,000 for 1999, an increase of $4,688,000, or 20%. Approximately 37% of the increase, or $1,748,000, was due to the 2000 New Clinics. The 10 remaining 63% increase, or $2,940,000, was due principally to increased stafﬁng to meet the increase in patient visits for the Mature Clinics, coupled with an increase in bonuses earned by the clinic directors at the Mature Clinics. Such bonuses are based on the net revenues or operating proﬁt generated by the individual clinics. Salaries and related costs as a percent of net patient revenues and management contract revenues combined decreased to 46% for 2000 from 47% for 1999. Clinic Operating Costs — Rent, Clinic Supplies and Other Rent, clinic supplies and other increased to $14,952,000 for 2000 from $12,455,000 for 1999, an increase of $2,497,000, or 20%. Approximately 57% of the increase, or $1,415,000, was due to the 2000 New Clinics, while 43%, or $1,082,000, of the increase was due to the Mature Clinics. The increase in rent, clinic supplies and other for the Mature Clinics related to the fact that of the 17 clinics opened during 1999, 59% opened during the second half of the year. Accordingly, 2000 was the ﬁrst year in which they incurred a full year of expenses. Rent, clinic supplies and other as a percent of net patient revenues and management contract revenues combined remained unchanged at 24% for 2000 and 1999. Clinic Operating Costs — Provision for Doubtful Accounts The provision for doubtful accounts increased to $1,596,000 for 2000 from $1,165,000 for 1999, an increase of 37%, or $431,000. Approximately 16% of the increase, or $70,000, was due to the 2000 New Clinics. The remaining 84% increase, or $361,000, was due to the Mature Clinics. The provision for doubtful accounts as a percent of net patient revenues was 2.6% for 2000 compared to 2.4% for 1999. Corporate Ofﬁce Costs — General and Administrative General and administrative costs, consisting primarily of salaries and beneﬁts of corporate ofﬁce personnel, rent, insurance costs, depreciation and amortization, travel and legal and professional fees increased to $5,790,000 for 2000 from $4,803,000 for 1999, an increase of $987,000, or 21%. General and administrative costs increased primarily as a result of increased travel and salaries and beneﬁts related to additional personnel hired to support an increasing number of clinics. General and administrative costs as a percent of net patient revenues and management contract revenues combined remained unchanged at 9% for 2000 and 1999. Corporate Ofﬁce Costs — Recruitment and Development Recruitment and development costs primarily represent salaries and beneﬁts of recruitment and development personnel, rent, travel, marketing and recruiting fees attributed directly to the Company’s activities in the develop- ment and acquisition of new clinics. Recruitment and development personnel have no involvement with a facility following opening. All recruitment and development personnel are located at the Company’s corporate ofﬁce in Houston, Texas. Recruitment and development costs increased $133,000, or 8%, to $1,817,000 in 2000 from $1,684,000 in 1999. Recruitment and development costs for 2000 and 1999 included $369,000 and $384,000, respectively, related to the surgery center initiative discontinued in March 2000. The increase was primarily due to increased salaries and beneﬁts of development personnel and increased recruitment fees and marketing expenses associated with opening 28 new clinics in 2000 over 17 in 1999. Excluding expenses related to the surgery centers, recruitment and development costs as a percent of net patient revenues and management contract revenues combined decreased to 2% for 2000 from 3% for 1999. Interest Expense Interest expense increased $53,000, or 7%, to $780,000 for 2000 from $727,000 for 1999. This increase in interest was due to $2,115,000 borrowed by the Company to help ﬁnance the repurchase of 1,130,000 shares of its common stock. In November 2000, the Company repaid $1,215,000 of this loan, leaving a balance of $900,000 at December 31, 2000. The loan bears interest at a rate per annum of prime plus one-half percentage point and is repayable in quarterly installments of $250,000 beginning March 2001. See ‘‘Liquidity and Capital Resources.’’ 11 Minority Interests in Earnings of Subsidiary Limited Partnerships Minority interests in earnings of subsidiary limited partnerships increased $889,000, or 34%, to $3,466,000 for 2000 from $2,577,000 for 1999 due to the increase in aggregate proﬁtability of those clinics in which partners have achieved positive retained earnings and are accruing partnership income. Provision for Income Taxes The provision for income taxes increased to $2,403,000 for 2000 from $1,568,000 for 1999, an increase of $835,000, or 53%. During 2000 and 1999, the Company accrued income taxes at effective tax rates of 39% and 40%, respectively. The 2000 and 1999 rates exceeded the U.S. statutory tax rate of 34% due primarily to state income taxes. Fiscal Year 1999 Compared to Fiscal Year 1998 Net Patient Revenues Net patient revenues increased to $49,056,000 for 1999 from $43,179,000 for 1998, an increase of $5,877,000, or 14%, on a 13% increase in patient visits to 566,000. Net patient revenues from the 17 clinics opened in 1999 (the ‘‘1999 New Clinics’’) accounted for 25% of the increase, or $1,488,000. The remaining increase of $4,389,000 in net patient revenues comes from those 96 clinics opened before 1999. The $4,389,000 increase in net patient revenues from these 96 clinics was primarily due to a 9% increase in the number of patient visits to 547,000, coupled with an increase in the average net revenue per visit to $86.94. Management Contract Revenues Management contract revenues increased to $2,112,000 for 1999 from $1,320,000 for 1998, an increase of $792,000, or 60%. This increase was due to the fact that three of the six management contracts were entered into in the second half of 1998. Accordingly, 1999 was the ﬁrst full year revenues were recognized for all six third-party facilities under management at December 31, 1999. Other Revenues Other revenues, consisting of interest and sublease income, decreased $138,000, or 41%, to $200,000 for 1999 from $338,000 for 1998. This decrease was due primarily to a decrease in interest income as a result of a lower average amount of cash and cash equivalents available for investment during 1999 compared to 1998. Clinic Operating Costs Clinic operating costs as a percent of net patient revenues and management contract revenues combined decreased to 74% for 1999 from 76% for 1998. Clinic Operating Costs — Salaries and Related Costs Salaries and related costs increased to $23,995,000 for 1999 from $21,029,000 for 1998, an increase of $2,966,000, or 14%. Approximately 26% of the increase, or $781,000, was due to the 1999 New Clinics. The remaining 74% increase, or $2,185,000, was due principally to increased stafﬁng to meet the increase in patient visits for the clinics opened prior to 1999, coupled with an increase in bonuses earned by the clinic directors at the clinics opened prior to 1999. Such bonuses are based on the net revenues or operating proﬁt generated by the individual clinics. Salaries and related costs as a percent of net patient revenues and management contract revenues combined remained unchanged at 47% for 1999 and 1998. Clinic Operating Costs — Rent, Clinic Supplies and Other Rent, clinic supplies and other increased to $12,455,000 for 1999 from $11,502,000 for 1998, an increase of $953,000, or 8%. Approximately 71% of the increase, or $677,000, was due to the 1999 New Clinics, while 29%, or $276,000, of the increase was due to the clinics opened prior to 1999. The $276,000 increase from the clinics opened 12 prior to 1999 was due to the fact that of the 20 clinics opened during 1998, 65% opened during the second half of the year. Accordingly, 1999 was the ﬁrst year in which they incurred a full year of expenses. Rent, clinic supplies and other as a percent of net patient revenues and management contract revenues combined decreased to 24% for 1999 from 26% for 1998. Clinic Operating Costs — Provision for Doubtful Accounts The provision for doubtful accounts increased to $1,165,000 for 1999 from $1,143,000 for 1998, an increase of $22,000, or 2%. This increase was due to a $32,000 increase associated with the 1999 New Clinics, offset, in part, by a decrease of $10,000 for the clinics opened prior to 1999. The provision for doubtful accounts as a percent of net patient revenues decreased to 2.4% in 1999 from 2.6% in 1998. Corporate Ofﬁce Costs — General and Administrative General and administrative costs, consisting primarily of salaries and beneﬁts of corporate ofﬁce personnel, rent, insurance costs, depreciation and amortization, travel and legal and professional fees increased to $4,803,000 for 1999 from $4,240,000 for 1998, an increase of $563,000, or 13%. General and administrative costs increased primarily as a result of salaries and beneﬁts related to additional personnel hired to support an increasing number of clinics. In addition, in July 1998, the Company increased the square footage occupied at its corporate ofﬁce in Houston, Texas and extended the lease for a ﬁve-year period ending July 2003. In connection with these changes to the lease, rent expense increased substantially. General and administrative costs as a percent of net patient revenues and management contract revenues combined decreased to 9% for 1999 from 10% for 1998. Corporate Ofﬁce Costs — Recruitment and Development Recruitment and development costs primarily represent salaries and beneﬁts of recruitment and development personnel, rent, travel, marketing and recruiting fees attributed directly to the Company’s activities in the develop- ment and acquisition of new clinics and, until its discontinuance in March 2000, the development of its surgery center initiative. Recruitment and development personnel have no involvement with a facility following opening. All recruitment and development personnel are located at the Company’s corporate ofﬁce in Houston, Texas. Recruit- ment and development costs increased $288,000, or 21%, to $1,684,000 in 1999 from $1,396,000 in 1998. Recruitment and development expenses related to the surgery center initiative accounted for 133%, or $384,000, of the increase between 1999 and 1998. The majority of the $384,000 surgery center costs related to consulting fees, salaries of development personnel, legal fees and travel associated with potential acquisitions of surgery centers and identifying and investigating potential sites for the development of new surgery centers. Excluding the effects of the surgery center initiative, recruitment and development costs decreased $96,000 from 1998 to 1999. Recruitment and development costs as a percent of net patient revenues and management contract revenues combined remained unchanged at 3% for 1999 and 1998. Loss on Closure of Facility In August 1998, the Company closed a clinic located in Corpus Christi, Texas due to adverse clinic performance. During 1998, the Company recognized a $230,000 loss related to this closure. Of the $230,000 loss, $18,000 represented lease commitments, $99,000 was due to the write-off of goodwill, ﬁxed assets, leasehold improvements and a non-compete agreement and the remainder was costs incurred in connection with closing the facility. The Corpus Christi, Texas clinic accounted for net patient revenues and clinic operating costs for 1998 of $218,000 and $603,000, respectively. Minority Interests in Earnings of Subsidiary Limited Partnerships Minority interests in earnings of subsidiary limited partnerships increased $714,000, or 38%, to $2,577,000 in 1999 from $1,863,000 in 1998 due to the increase in aggregate proﬁtability of those clinics in which partners have achieved positive retained earnings and are accruing partnership income. 13 Provision for Income Taxes The provision for income taxes increased to $1,568,000 for 1999 from $1,108,000 for 1998, an increase of $460,000, or 42%. During 1999 and 1998, the Company accrued income taxes at effective tax rates of 40% and 41%, respectively. The 1999 and 1998 rates exceeded the U.S. statutory tax rate of 34% due primarily to state income taxes. Liquidity and Capital Resources At December 31, 2000, the Company had $2,071,000 in cash and cash equivalents available to fund the working capital needs of its operating subsidiaries, future clinic developments, acquisitions and investments. Included in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2000 was $710,000 in a money market fund invested in short-term debt instruments issued by an agency of the U.S. Government. The Company also had a revolving line of credit with a bank which provides for borrowings up to $500,000, as needed, at a rate of prime plus one-half percentage point. The decrease in cash of $1,959,000 from December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2000 is due primarily to the Company’s use of cash to repurchase 1,130,000 shares of its common stock in August 2000 for $6,275,000 (including expenses), fund capital expenditures primarily for physical therapy equipment and leasehold improvements of $2,827,000, distribute $3,072,000 to minority investors in subsidiary limited partnerships and pay on notes payable of $1,254,000, offset, in part, by cash provided by operating activities of $8,861,000, proceeds from a bank loan of $2,115,000 and proceeds of $394,000 from the exercise of stock options. The Company’s current ratio decreased to 4.14 to 1.00 at December 31, 2000 from 6.79 to 1.00 at Decem- ber 31, 1999. The decrease in the current ratio was due primarily to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents due to the repurchase of common stock. At December 31, 2000, the Company had a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.85 to 1.00 compared to 0.76 to 1.00 at December 31, 1999. The increase in the debt-to-equity ratio from December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2000 resulted from the decrease in equity due to the common stock repurchase in August 2000 of $6,275,000 (including expenses), offset, in part, by net income of $3,735,000, the conversion of $850,000 convertible subordinated debt into 144,998 shares of common stock and the proceeds and tax beneﬁt from the exercise of stock options of $394,000 and $255,000, respectively. In April 1999, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the use of available cash to purchase up to 692,000 shares of its common stock at a price not greater than $5.00 nor less than $4.25 per share. The Company conducted the repurchases through a procedure commonly referred to as a ‘‘Dutch Auction,’’ and completed the repurchase of 692,000 shares (9.6% of the then outstanding shares) in May 1999. The shares were repurchased at a price of $4.875 per share for a total aggregate cost of $3,414,000 (including expenses). In July 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase for cash of up to 1,000,000 shares of its issued and outstanding common stock for a price of $5.50 per share (the ‘‘Offer’’). Pursuant to the terms of the Offer, the Company could buy up to an additional 2% of its outstanding shares without amending or extending the Offer. The Company completed the repurchase of 1,130,000 shares in August 2000 for a total aggregate cost of $6,275,000 (including expenses). The Company utilized cash on hand and a convertible line of credit in the amount of $2,115,000 to fund the repurchase of the stock. In conjunction with the Offer, the Company entered into a Letter Loan Agreement with a bank wherein the bank agreed to lend the Company up to $2,500,000 on a convertible line of credit, convertible to a term loan on December 31, 2000, to purchase stock tendered pursuant to the Offer. The loan bears interest at a rate per annum of prime plus one-half percentage point and is repayable in quarterly installments of $250,000 beginning March 2001. Additionally, the bank agreed to loan up to $500,000 for working capital purposes pursuant to a revolving line of credit. The revolving line of credit has a per annum three-eighths of one percent commitment fee on the unused portion and bears interest on outstanding loans at a rate per annum of prime plus one-half percentage point. Any amounts borrowed and outstanding under the revolving line of credit must be repaid on July 1, 2001. Through December 31, 2000, the Company had borrowed $2,115,000 and $-0-under the $2,500,000 convertible line of credit and the $500,000 revolving line of credit, respectively. 14 In November 2000, the Company repaid $1,215,000 of the $2,115,000 borrowed under the convertible line of credit. Subsequent to December 31, 2000, the Company repaid the remaining balance of $900,000 on the convertible line of credit. Management believes that existing funds, supplemented by cash ﬂows from existing operations and the revolving line of credit will be sufﬁcient to meet its current operating needs and its development plans through at least 2002. Recently Promulgated Accounting Standards Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (‘‘SFAS 133’’), ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,’’ as amended by SFAS No. 138. SFAS 133 standardizes the accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts. Under the standard, entities are required to carry all derivative instruments in the statement of ﬁnancial position at fair value. Adoption of SFAS 133 did not have a material effect on the Company’s ﬁnancial condition or results of operations because the Company historically has not entered into derivative or other ﬁnancial instruments for trading or speculative purposes nor does it use or intend to use derivative ﬁnancial instruments or derivative commodity instruments. Factors Affecting Future Results Clinic Development As of December 31, 2000, the Company had 139 clinics in operation, 28 of which opened in 2000. Management’s goal for 2001 is to open between 30 and 35 additional clinics. The opening of these clinics is subject to, among other things, the Company’s ability to identify suitable geographic locations and physical therapy clinic partners. The Company’s operating results will be adversely impacted by initial operating losses from the new clinics. During the initial period of operation, operating margins for newly opened clinics tend to be lower than more seasoned clinics due to the start-up costs of newly opened clinics (including, without limitation, salaries and related costs of the physical therapist and other clinic personnel, rent and equipment and other supplies required to open the clinic) and the fact that patient revenues tend to be lower in the ﬁrst year of a new clinic’s operation and increase signiﬁcantly over the subsequent two to three years. Based on historical performance of the Company’s new clinics, the clinics opened in 2000 should favorably impact the Company’s results of operations for 2001 and beyond. Convertible Subordinated Debt In June 1993, the Company completed the issuance and sale at par in a private placement of $3,050,000 of 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes due June 30, 2003 (the ‘‘Initial Series Notes’’). In May 1994, the Company completed the issuance and sale at par in a private placement of $2,000,000 of 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes, Series B due June 30, 2004 (the ‘‘Series B Notes’’) and $3,000,000 of 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes, Series C due June 30, 2004 (the ‘‘Series C Notes’’ and collectively, the Initial Series Notes, the Series B Notes and the Series C Notes are hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Convertible Subordinated Notes’’). The Convertible Subordinated Notes are convertible at the option of the holders thereof into the number of whole shares of Company common stock determined by dividing the principal amount of the Notes so converted by $5.00 in the case of the Initial Series Notes and the Series C Notes or $6.00 in the case of the Series B Notes. Holders of Series B Notes were entitled to receive an interest enhancement payable in shares of Company common stock based upon the market value of the Company’s common stock at June 30, 1996. In July 1996, the Company issued 141,930 shares of its common stock in connection with the interest enhancement provision. During 2000, $100,000 of the Initial Series Notes and $750,000 of the Series B Notes were converted by the note holders into 20,000 and 124,998 shares of common stock, respectively. This resulted in a balance of $2,950,000, $1,250,000 and $3,000,000 for the Initial Series Notes, the Series B Notes and the Series C Notes, respectively, at December 31, 2000. In January 2001, an additional $650,000 of the Initial Series Notes was converted by a note holder into 130,000 shares of common stock. In addition, the Company exercised its right to require conversion of the remaining balance 15 of $2,300,000 of the Initial Series Notes and $1,250,000 of the Series B Notes into 460,000 and 208,332 shares of common stock, respectively. The debt conversions increase the Company’s shareholders’ equity by the carrying amount of the debt con- verted, thus improving the Company’s debt to equity ratio and will favorably impact results of operations and cash ﬂow due to the interest savings of approximately $400,000 per year, before income tax, on the debt. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk As of December 31, 2000, the Company had outstanding $2,950,000 aggregate principal amount of the Initial Series Notes, $1,250,000 aggregate principal amount of the Series B Notes and $3,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Series C Notes (collectively, the ‘‘Notes’’). On November 3, 2000, $750,000 of the Series B Notes was converted into 124,998 shares of common stock. The fair value of the $750,000 converted debt was approximately $1,184,000 based on the closing sales price of the Company’s common stock on November 2, 2000 of $9.469, as reported by the National Market of Nasdaq. On November 30, 2000, $100,000 of the Initial Series Notes was converted into 20,000 shares of common stock. The fair value of the $100,000 converted debt was approximately $196,000 based on the closing sales price of the Company’s common stock on November 29, 2000 of $9.813, as reported by the National Market of Nasdaq. On January 8, 2001, an additional $650,000 of the Initial Series Notes was converted into 130,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The fair value of the $650,000 converted debt was approximately $1,857,000 based on the closing sales price of the Company’s common stock on January 5, 2001 of $14.281, as reported by the National Market of Nasdaq. On January 12, 2001, the Company required conversion of the remaining $2,300,000 of the Initial Series Notes and $1,250,000 of the Series B Notes into 460,000 and 208,332 shares of common stock, respectively. The fair value of the $2,300,000 Initial Series Notes and the $1,250,000 Series B Notes was approxi- mately $6,404,000 and $2,900,000, respectively, based on the closing sales price of the Company’s common stock on January 11, 2001 of $13.922, as reported by the National Market of Nasdaq. As of January 12, 2001, the Company had outstanding $3,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Series C Notes. Based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on March 20, 2001 of $15.00, as reported by the National Market of Nasdaq, the fair value of the Series C Notes was $9,000,000. See ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Convertible Subordinated Debt.’’ Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. See ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.’’ 16 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Independent Auditors’ Reports ************************************************************** Audited Financial Statements: Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 *********************************** Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 ********** Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 ** Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 ********* Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements **************************************************** 18 20 22 23 24 26 17 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT Board of Directors and Shareholders U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. and subsidiaries (the ‘‘Company’’) as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash ﬂows for the years then ended. In connection with our audits of the consolidated ﬁnancial statements, we have also audited the related ﬁnancial statement schedule for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999. These consolidated ﬁnancial statements and the ﬁnancial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated ﬁnancial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the ﬁnancial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the ﬁnancial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and signiﬁcant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall ﬁnancial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated ﬁnancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the ﬁnancial position of U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of their operations and their cash ﬂows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related ﬁnancial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated ﬁnancial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. Houston, Texas March 8, 2001 KPMG LLP 18 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS Board of Directors and Shareholders U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash ﬂows of U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc., and subsidiaries (the ‘‘Company’’) for the year ended December 31, 1998. Our audit also included the ﬁnancial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 14(a)(2). These ﬁnancial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these ﬁnancial state- ments based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the ﬁnancial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the ﬁnancial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and signiﬁcant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall ﬁnancial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated ﬁnancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of operations and cash ﬂows of U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1998, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related ﬁnancial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic ﬁnancial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. Houston, Texas March 16, 1999 ERNST & YOUNG LLP 19 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands) ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents ************************************************* Patient accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,780 and $2,014, respectively *********************************************************** Accounts receivable — other *********************************************** Other current assets ****************************************************** Total current assets************************************************* Fixed assets: Furniture and equipment************************************************** Leasehold improvements ************************************************** Less accumulated depreciation and amortization******************************** Goodwill, net of amortization of $291 and $230, respectively *********************** Other assets, net of amortization of $483 and $464, respectively ******************** December 31, 2000 1999 $ 2,071 $ 4,030 10,701 452 519 13,743 12,141 6,313 18,454 11,463 6,991 897 1,339 9,605 384 630 14,649 10,625 5,306 15,931 9,446 6,485 948 1,264 $22,970 $23,346 See notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements. 20 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands, except share amounts) LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable — trade ************************************************* Accrued expenses ******************************************************** Estimated third-party payor (Medicare) settlements ***************************** Notes payable*********************************************************** Total current liabilities ********************************************** Notes payable — long-term portion ******************************************* Convertible subordinated notes payable **************************************** Minority interests in subsidiary limited partnerships******************************* Commitments and contingencies********************************************** Shareholders’ equity: Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 500,000 shares authorized, -0- shares outstanding ***** Common stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 5,698,916 and 6,581,018 shares issued at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively ************ Additional paid-in capital ************************************************* Accumulated earnings ****************************************************** Treasury stock at cost, 9,800 shares held at December 31, 2000 and 1999************* Total shareholders’ equity******************************************** December 31, 2000 1999 $ 434 1,622 355 912 3,323 26 7,200 2,858 — $ 349 1,329 439 39 2,156 37 8,050 2,383 — — — 57 3,504 6,049 (47) 9,563 66 8,387 2,314 (47) 10,720 $22,970 $23,346 See notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements. 21 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (in thousands, except per share data) Net patient revenues ********************************************* Management contract revenues ************************************* Other revenues ************************************************* Net revenues *************************************************** Clinic operating costs: Salaries and related costs**************************************** Rent, clinic supplies and other *********************************** Provision for doubtful accounts ********************************** Corporate ofﬁce costs: General and administrative ************************************** Recruitment and development *********************************** Loss on closure of facility ***************************************** Operating income before non-operating expenses ********************** Interest expense ************************************************* Minority interests in subsidiary limited partnerships ******************** Income before income taxes *************************************** Provision for income taxes **************************************** Net income **************************************************** Basic earnings per common share*********************************** Diluted earnings per common share********************************* Year Ended December 31, 1999 1998 2000 $60,667 2,369 186 63,222 28,683 14,952 1,596 45,231 5,790 1,817 7,607 — 10,384 780 3,466 6,138 2,403 $49,056 2,112 200 51,368 23,995 12,455 1,165 37,615 4,803 1,684 6,487 — 7,266 727 2,577 3,962 1,568 $43,179 1,320 338 44,837 21,029 11,502 1,143 33,674 4,240 1,396 5,636 230 5,297 730 1,863 2,704 1,108 $ 3,735 $ 2,394 $ 1,596 $ $ .61 .52 $ $ .35 .34 $ $ .22 .21 See notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements. 22 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (in thousands) Balance at January 1, 1998 *********************** Proceeds from exercise of stock options ************** Net income************************************ Balance at December 31, 1998 ******************** Proceeds from exercise of stock options ************** Repurchase of common stock ********************* Net income************************************ Balance at December 31, 1999 ******************** Proceeds from exercise of stock options ************** Tax beneﬁt from exercise of stock options ************ Repurchase of common stock ********************* 8% convertible subordinated notes converted to common stock ******************************* Net income************************************ Balance at December 31, 2000 ******************** Common Stock Amount Shares 7,231 2 — 7,233 40 (692) — 6,581 103 — (1,130) 145 — $ 72 — — 72 1 (7) — 66 1 — (11) 1 — Add’l Paid-In Capital $11,653 7 — Accumu- lated Earnings / (Deﬁcit) $(1,676) — 1,596 11,660 134 (3,407) — 8,387 393 255 (6,264) 733 — (80) — — 2,394 2,314 — — — — 3,735 Treasury Stock Shares Amount (10) — — (10) — — — (10) — — — — — $(47) — — (47) — — — (47) — — — — — Total Share- holders’ Equity $10,002 7 1,596 11,605 135 (3,414) 2,394 10,720 394 255 (6,275) 734 3,735 5,699 $ 57 $ 3,504 $ 6,049 (10) $(47) $ 9,563 See notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements. 23 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 1999 1998 2000 Operating activities Net income ***************************************************** Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization ************************************ Minority interests in earnings of subsidiary limited partnerships ********** Provision for bad debts ****************************************** Loss on sale of ﬁxed assets *************************************** Loss on disposal of certain assets in closure of facility ****************** Tax beneﬁt from exercise of stock options *************************** Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Increase in patient accounts receivable ****************************** Increase in accounts receivable-other******************************** Decrease (increase) in other assets********************************** Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses ************ Decrease in estimated third-party payor (Medicare) settlements*********** Net cash provided by operating activities ****************************** $ 3,735 $ 2,394 $ 1,596 2,331 3,466 1,596 35 — 255 (2,692) (68) (91) 378 (84) 8,861 2,090 2,577 1,165 9 — — (2,265) (114) (94) (207) (505) 5,050 2,071 1,863 1,143 — 144 — (1,941) (83) 61 326 (151) 5,029 See notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements. 24 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 1999 1998 2000 Investing activities Purchase of ﬁxed assets ******************************************** Purchase of intangibles ******************************************** Proceeds on sale of ﬁxed assets ************************************** Net cash used in investing activities ********************************** Financing activities Proceeds from notes payable **************************************** Payment of notes payable ****************************************** Repurchase of common stock *************************************** Proceeds from investment of minority investors in subsidiary limited partnerships *************************************************** Proceeds from exercise of stock options ******************************* Conversion of notes payable into common stock************************ Distributions to minority investors in subsidiary limited partnerships******** Net cash used in ﬁnancing activities********************************** Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ********************* Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of year ************************* Cash and cash equivalents — end of year****************************** $(2,827) (10) 35 $(2,097) (24) 25 $(2,357) (192) 26 (2,802) (2,096) (2,523) 2,115 (1,253) (6,275) 81 394 (8) (3,072) (8,018) (1,959) 4,030 — (32) (3,414) 29 135 — (1,970) (5,252) (2,298) 6,328 — (55) — 6 7 — (1,692) (1,734) 772 5,556 $ 2,071 $ 4,030 $ 6,328 Supplemental disclosures of cash ﬂow information Cash paid during the year for: Income taxes ************************************************** Interest ****************************************************** $ 2,639 $ 1,763 $ 709 $ 651 $ $ 816 657 See notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements. 25 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2000 1. Organization, Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the ‘‘Company’’) develops, owns and operates outpatient physical and occupational therapy clinics. As of December 31, 2000, the Company owned and operated 139 clinics in 30 states. The clinics provide post-operative care and treatment for a variety of orthopedic-related disorders and sports-related injuries, treatment for neurologically-related injuries, rehabilitation of injured workers and preventative care. The clinics’ business primarily originates from physician referrals. The principal sources of payment for the clinics’ services are commercial health insurance, workers’ compensation insurance, managed care programs, Medicare and proceeds from personal injury cases. In addition to the Company’s partnership program, it also manages physical therapy facilities for third parties, including physicians, with seven such third-party facilities under management as of December 31, 2000. The consolidated ﬁnancial statements include the accounts of U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All signiﬁcant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The Company, through its wholly- owned subsidiaries, currently owns a 1% general partnership interest, with the exception of one clinic in which the Company owns a 6% general partnership interest, and limited partnership interests ranging from 49% to 99% in the clinics it owns and operates (with respect to 90% of the Company’s clinics, the Company owned a limited partnership interest of 64%). For the majority of the clinics, the managing therapist of each such clinic, along with other therapists at the clinic in several of the partnerships, own the remaining limited partnership interests in the clinic. In some instances, the Company develops satellite clinic facilities which are extensions of existing clinics, and thus, clinic partnerships may consist of one or more clinic locations. In the majority of the partnership agreements the therapist partner begins with a 20% proﬁt interest in his or her clinic limited partnership which increases by 3% at the end of each year until his or her interest reaches 35%. The minority interest in the equity and earnings of the clinic limited partnerships is presented separately in the consolidated ﬁnancial statements. 2. Signiﬁcant Accounting Policies Common Stock On January 5, 2001, the Company effected a two-for-one common stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend to stockholders of record as of December 27, 2000. All share and per share information included in the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial statements and related notes has been adjusted to reﬂect the stock split. Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents. The Company, pursuant to its investment policy, invests its cash in deposits with major ﬁnancial institutions, in highly rated commercial paper and short-term treasury and United States government agency securities. Included in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2000 and 1999 was $710,000 and $1,245,000, respectively, in a money market fund invested in short-term debt instruments issued by an agency of the U.S. Government and $-0- and $993,000, respectively, of short-term commercial paper. Long-Lived Assets Fixed assets are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Estimated useful lives for furniture and equipment range from three to eight years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the assets or the related lease terms, whichever is shorter. Non-compete agreements are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their respective terms, ranging from two to seven years. Goodwill is being amortized on a straight-line basis over twenty years. 26 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) In August 1998, the Company closed a clinic located in Corpus Christi, Texas due to adverse clinic performance. During 1998, the Company recognized a $230,000 loss relating to this closure. Of the $230,000 loss, $18,000 represented lease commitments, $99,000 was due to the write-off of goodwill, ﬁxed assets, leasehold improvements and a non-compete agreement and the remainder was costs incurred in connection with closing the facility. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (‘‘SFAS’’) No. 121, ‘‘Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of.’’ This statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identiﬁable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash ﬂows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Net Patient Revenues Net patient revenues are reported at the estimated net realizable amounts from patients, third-party payors, and others for services rendered. The Company has agreements with third-party payors that provide for payments to the Company at amounts different from its established rates. Prior to January 1, 1999, Medicare reimbursement for outpatient physical and occupational therapy services furnished by clinics was based on a cost reimbursement methodology. The Company was reimbursed at a tentative rate with ﬁnal settlement determined after submission of an annual cost report by the Company and audits thereof by the Medicare ﬁscal intermediary. Effective in 1999, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (‘‘BBA’’) provides that reimbursement for outpatient therapy services provided to Medicare beneﬁciaries is pursuant to a fee schedule published by the Department of Health and Human Services (‘‘HHS’’), and the total amount that may be paid by Medicare in any one year for outpatient physical (including speech-language pathology) or occupational therapy to any one patient is limited to $1,500, except for services provided in hospitals. On November 29, 1999, President Clinton signed into law the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Balanced Budget Reﬁnement Act of 1999 (‘‘BBRA’’) which, among other provisions, placed a two-year moratorium on the $1,500 reimbursement limit for Medicare therapy services provided in 2000 and 2001. On December 21, 2000, the President signed into law the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Beneﬁts Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 (‘‘BIPA’’) which, among other provisions, extended the moratorium for one year through December 31, 2002. Laws and regulations governing the Medicare program are complex and subject to interpretation. The Company believes that it is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and is not aware of any pending or threatened investigations involving allegations of potential wrongdoing that would have a material effect on the Company’s ﬁnancial statements as of December 31, 2000. Compliance with such laws and regulations can be subject to future government review and interpretation, as well as signiﬁcant regulatory action including ﬁnes, penalties, and exclusion from the Medicare program. Income Taxes Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between ﬁnancial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. 27 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Comprehensive Earnings On January 1, 1998, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 130, ‘‘Reporting Comprehensive Income,’’ which requires reporting of comprehensive income (earnings) and its components, in the statement of operations and statement of stockholders’ equity, including net earnings as a component. Comprehensive earnings is the change in equity of a business from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Company does not have any components of other comprehensive income other than net earnings and activity from owner sources. Fair Values The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair values. The fair values of the long-term convertible subordinated notes are based on the Company’s stock price and the number of shares that would be acquired upon conversion. The long-term convertible subordinated notes are described fully in Note 4. Use of Estimates Management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated ﬁnancial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Reclassiﬁcations Certain amounts presented in the accompanying consolidated ﬁnancial statements for 1998 and 1999 have been reclassiﬁed to conform with the presentation used for 2000. Revenue Recognition In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (‘‘SAB 101’’), ‘‘Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.’’ SAB 101 summarizes certain of the staff’s views in applying accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to revenue recognition in ﬁnancial statements. The Company believes that its accounting practices are currently in compliance with SAB 101. Stock Options The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, ‘‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees’’ (APB 25) and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by FASB Statement No. 123, ‘‘Accounting and Disclosure of Stock-Based Compensation,’’ and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of that Statement. The fair value of these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. All of the Company’s stock option plans are administered by a committee comprised of selected members of the Board of Directors (the ‘‘Stock Option Committee’’). 3. Non-Cash Transaction In May 1994, the Company issued $2,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes, Series B (the ‘‘Series B Notes’’). The Series B Notes contained a Contingent Interest Enhancement provision which allowed the Series B Note Holders to receive an interest enhancement payable in shares of Company common stock based upon the market value of the Company’s shares for the month of June 1996. In 1996, a total of 141,930 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in connection with the Contingent Interest Enhancement provision. Deferred ﬁnancing costs, included in ‘‘Other Assets’’ on the balance sheet and being amortized over the life of the Series B Notes, totaling $765,000 were recorded in connection with the issuance of the 141,930 shares. 28 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) On November 3, 2000, $750,000 of the Series B Notes were converted by the note holders into 124,998 shares of Company common stock. In conjunction with this conversion, the unamortized portion of the deferred ﬁnancing costs related to the converted notes was taken to additional paid-in capital. Interest expense for 2000, 1999 and 1998 included $71,000, $75,000 and $75,000, respectively, of amortization relating to the deferred ﬁnancing costs. On November 30, 2000, $100,000 of the 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes due June 30, 2003 was converted by the note holder into 20,000 shares of common stock. 4. Notes Payable On June 2, 1993, the Company completed the issuance and sale of $3,050,000 aggregate principal amount of 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes due June 30, 2003 (the ‘‘Notes’’). The Notes, which are subordinated to any indebtedness for borrowed money, were issued at par in a private placement transaction to a total of six investors, including two directors who purchased a total of $175,000 of the Notes and a company controlled by one of the Company’s directors, Mr. Richard C.W. Mauran, who purchased $2,000,000 of the Notes. The Notes bear interest at 8% per annum, payable quarterly, and are convertible at the option of the note holders into common stock of the Company at any time during the life of the Notes. The conversion price is $5.00 per share (subject to adjustment as provided in the Notes). The Company can require the note holders to convert the Notes into shares of common stock at any time that the average trading price of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $10.00 per share (subject to adjustment as provided in the Notes) during the immediately preceding 90-day period. During 2000, $100,000 of the Notes were converted into 20,000 shares of common stock of the Company. On May 5, 1994, the Company completed the issuance and sale of the Series B Notes. The Series B Notes were issued at par in a private placement. The Series B Notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, into the number of whole shares of the Company’s common stock determined by dividing the principal amount so converted by $6.00, (the ‘‘Conversion Price’’), subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. The Company can require the note holders to convert the Notes into shares of common stock at any time that the average trading price of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $10.00 per share (subject to adjustment as provided in the Notes) during the immediately preceding 90-day period. The Series B Notes bear interest from the date of issuance at a rate of 8% per annum, payable quarterly. Holders of Series B Notes were entitled to receive an interest enhancement payable in shares of Company common stock based upon the market value of the Company’s common stock at June 30, 1996, which was two years from the date of issuance of the Series B Notes. In July 1996, the Company issued 141,930 shares of its common stock in connection with the interest enhancement provision. During 2000, $750,000 of the Series B Notes were converted into 124,998 shares of common stock of the Company. The Company also completed on May 5, 1994, the issuance and sale of $3,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes, Series C due June 30, 2004 (the ‘‘Series C Notes’’). The Series C Notes were issued at par in a private placement to a company controlled by one of the Company’s directors, Mr. Richard C.W. Mauran. The Series C Notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, into the number of whole shares of common stock determined by dividing the principal amount so converted by $5.00, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. The Series C Notes bear interest from the date of issuance at a rate of 8% per annum, payable quarterly. Both Series B Notes and Series C Notes are unsecured subordinated obligations of the Company and rank pari passu with the Company’s 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes due June 30, 2003. Each of the Notes are subordi- nated in right of payment to all other indebtedness for borrowed money incurred by the Company. Holders of the Notes have piggy-back registration rights as set forth in the Registration Agreement relating to the Notes. Holders of the Series B Notes and Series C Notes each have demand and piggy-back registration rights as set forth in the Registration Agreements related to the Notes. In July 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase for cash of up to 1,000,000 shares of its issued and outstanding common stock for a price of $5.50 per share (the ‘‘Offer’’). Pursuant to the terms of the 29 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Offer, the Company could buy up to an additional 2% of its outstanding shares without amending or extending the Offer. The Company completed the repurchase of 1,130,000 shares in August 2000 for a total aggregate cost of $6,275,000 (including expenses). The Company utilized cash on hand and a convertible line of credit in the amount of $2,115,000 to fund the repurchase of the stock. In conjunction with the Offer, the Company entered into an agreement with a bank wherein the bank agreed to lend the Company up to $2,500,000 on a convertible line of credit, convertible to a term loan on December 31, 2000, to purchase stock tendered pursuant to the Offer. The loan bears interest at a rate per annum of prime plus one-half percentage point and is repayable in quarterly installments of $250,000 beginning March 2001. As of December 31, 2000, the Company had borrowed $2,115,000 under the $2,500,000 convertible line of credit. In November 2000, the Company repaid $1,215,000 of the $2,115,000 borrowed under the convertible line of credit. The Company also had a revolving line of credit with a bank which provides for borrowings up to $500,000, as needed, at a rate of prime plus one-half percentage point. Notes payable as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 consist of the following: Promissory note at a ﬂoating interest rate of 1% above prime, payable in monthly installments through November 1, 2001. This note is secured by the facility, with a net book value of approximately $65,000, of one of the Company’s clinics ************************************* Promissory note with an 8% interest rate payable in equal monthly installments through March 19, 2007. This note is secured by the facility, with a net book value of approximately $44,000, of one of the Company’s clinics ****************************************** Unsecured promissory notes with a 7% interest rate payable in equal monthly installments through December 31, 2000***************** 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes due June 30, 2003 with interest payable quarterly ******************************************* 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes, Series B, due June 30, 2004 with interest payable quarterly ************************************* 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes, Series C, due June 30, 2004 with interest payable quarterly ************************************* Letter Loan Agreement with interest at a rate per annum of prime plus one-half percentage point and is repayable in quarterly installments of $250,000 beginning March 2001 ****************************** Less current portion ******************************************* 2000 1999 $ 9,000 $ 17,000 29,000 — 32,000 27,000 2,950,000 3,050,000 1,250,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 900,000 8,138,000 (912,000) — 8,126,000 (39,000) $7,226,000 $8,087,000 Scheduled maturities for the next ﬁve years and thereafter as of December 31, 2000 are as follows: 2001******************************************** 2002******************************************** 2003******************************************** 2004******************************************** 2005******************************************** Thereafter**************************************** $ 912,000 4,000 2,954,000 4,255,000 5,000 8,000 $8,138,000 30 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) 5. Related Party Transactions During 2000, 1999 and 1998, the Company recognized interest expense of $415,000, $414,000 and $414,000, respectively, relating to Convertible Subordinated Notes held by directors of the Company. See Note 4 for additional information on related party transactions. 6. Income Taxes Signiﬁcant components of deferred tax assets, included in other assets on the balance sheet at December 31, 2000 and 1999, were as follows: 2000 1999 Deferred tax assets: Vacation accrual ************************************* Allowance for bad debt******************************** Depreciation **************************************** Other********************************************** Net deferred tax assets ********************************** $ 81,000 624,000 386,000 — $ 99,000 452,000 244,000 2,000 $1,091,000 $797,000 The differences between the federal tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate for the years ended Decem- ber 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 were as follows: 2000 1999 1998 U.S. tax at statutory rate ***** State income taxes*********** Nondeductible expenses ****** Other — net *************** $2,087,000 280,000 36,000 — 34.00% $1,347,000 197,000 4.56 22,000 0.59 2,000 — 34.00% $ 919,000 156,000 32,000 1,000 4.98 0.55 0.05 34.00% 5.77 1.18 0.03 $2,403,000 39.15% $1,568,000 39.58% $1,108,000 40.98% Signiﬁcant components of the provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 were as follows: Current: 2000 1999 1998 Federal ************************************** State **************************************** Total current ********************************* $2,273,000 424,000 $1,378,000 299,000 $ 727,000 236,000 2,697,000 1,677,000 963,000 Deferred: Federal ************************************** State **************************************** Total deferred ********************************* Total income tax provision ************************ (294,000) — (294,000) (109,000) — (109,000) 145,000 — 145,000 $2,403,000 $1,568,000 $1,108,000 The Company is required to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based 31 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income in the periods which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes that a valuation allowance is not required, as it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufﬁcient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets. 7. Stock Option Plans 1992 Stock Option Plan, as Amended The Company has a 1992 Stock Option Plan, as amended (the ‘‘Option Plan’’) which permits the Company to grant to key employees and outside directors of the Company options to purchase up to 1,990,000 shares of common stock (subject to proportionate adjustments in the event of stock dividends, splits, and similar corporate transactions). Incentive stock options (those intended to satisfy the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code) granted under the Option Plan are granted at an exercise price of not less than the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the date of grant. The exercise prices of non-qualiﬁed options granted under the Option Plan are determined by the Stock Option Committee. The period within which each option will be exercisable is determined by the Stock Option Committee (in no event may the exercise period of an incentive stock option extend beyond 10 years from the date of grant). As of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, 190,000, 190,000 and 190,000 incentive stock options and 1,983,108, 1,750,100 and 1,664,100 non-qualiﬁed stock options have been granted, respectively. As of Decem- ber 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, 32,500, 32,500 and 32,500 incentive stock options and 232,850, 227,250 and 193,750 non-qualiﬁed stock options have been forfeited, respectively. Incentive stock options of 47,500, 7,500 and 7,500 and non-qualiﬁed stock options of 128,900, 66,000 and 26,000 have been exercised as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Outstanding incentive stock options vest one-fourth on each of the second, third, fourth and ﬁfth anniversaries of the date of grant. Of the 1,621,358 non-qualiﬁed stock options granted, but not yet exercised as of December 31, 2000, 524,008 options vested 100% on the date of grant, and 1,097,350 options vest one-fourth on each of the second, third, fourth and ﬁfth anniversaries of the date of grant. A summary of the Company’s Option Plan activity and related information for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 follows: Outstanding — beginning of year *** Granted************************ Exercised *********************** Forfeited *********************** Outstanding — end of year ******** Exercisable at end of year *********** Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year ********* $ 2000 1999 1998 Weighted- Average Exercise Price $4.71 4.96 4.06 5.56 $4.86 $4.68 Options 1,606,850 233,008 (102,900) (5,600) 1,731,358 1,085,207 Weighted- Average Exercise Price $4.72 4.21 3.39 5.62 $4.71 $4.46 Options 1,594,350 86,000 (40,000) (33,500) 1,606,850 897,875 Weighted- Average Exercise Price $4.46 5.30 4.45 4.72 $4.72 $4.42 Options 1,166,500 525,600 (1,750) (96,000) 1,594,350 772,563 2.11 $ 1.96 $ 2.21 Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 2000 ranged from $3.13 to $6.22. The weighted- average remaining contractual life of those options was 6.36 years. Executive Option Plan The Executive Option Plan (the ‘‘Executive Plan’’) was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on March 2, 1993 and was approved by the Company’s stockholders on May 24, 1993. The Executive Plan permits the Company to grant to any ofﬁcer of the Company or its afﬁliates, options to purchase up to 400,000 shares of common stock (subject to adjustments in the event of stock dividends, splits and similar corporate transactions). No 32 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) further grants of options will be made under the Executive Plan as a result of an amendment to the Option Plan during 1998. The exercise prices of the options granted under the Executive Plan are determined by the Stock Option Committee, and in the case of incentive and non-qualiﬁed options, may not be less than the greater of 175% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant of the option or the par value per share of the stock. The period within which each option will be exercisable is determined by the Stock Option Committee (in no event may the exercise period extend beyond 10 years from the date of grant). The outstanding options vest one-third on each of the third, fourth and ﬁfth anniversaries of the date of grant. As of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, 250,000, 250,000 and 250,000 incentive stock options and 180,000, 180,000 and 180,000 non-qualiﬁed stock options have been granted, respectively. As of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, 178,000, 178,000 and 140,000 incentive stock options and 82,000, 82,000 and 80,000 non- qualiﬁed stock options have been forfeited, respectively. No options have been exercised under the Executive Plan. A summary of the Company’s Executive Plan activity and related information for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 follows: 2000 1999 1998 Options Outstanding — beginning of year ******* 170,000 Granted**************************** — Exercised *************************** — Forfeited *************************** — Outstanding — end of year ************ 170,000 Exercisable at end of year ************** 170,000 Weighted- Average Exercise Price $6.73 — — — $6.73 $6.73 Weighted- Average Exercise Price $6.66 — — 6.35 $6.73 $6.73 Options 210,000 — — (40,000) 170,000 170,000 Weighted- Average Exercise Price $6.66 — — — $6.66 $6.58 Options 210,000 — — — 210,000 190,000 Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 2000 ranged from $6.34 to $7.44. The weighted- average remaining contractual life of those options was 2.82 years. 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan During 1999, the Company adopted the 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan (the ‘‘1999 Option Plan’’) which permits the Company to grant to certain non-ofﬁcer employees of the Company up to 200,000 non-statutory options to purchase shares of common stock (subject to proportionate adjustments in the event of stock dividends, splits, and similar corporate transactions). The exercise prices of options granted under the 1999 Option Plan are determined by the Stock Option Committee. The period within which each option will be exercisable is determined by the Stock Option Committee (in no event may the exercise period of an incentive stock option extend beyond 10 years from the date of grant). As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, 90,250 and 48,500 options, respectively, had been granted, 23,750 and 4,000 options, respectively, had been forfeited and no shares had been exercised under the 1999 Option Plan. The options vest one-fourth on each of the second, third, fourth and ﬁfth anniversaries of the date of grant. 33 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) A summary of the Company’s 1999 Option Plan activity and related information for the years ended Decem- ber 31, 2000 and 1999 follows: Outstanding — beginning of year ************************* Granted ********************************************* Forfeited********************************************* Outstanding — end of year ****************************** Exercisable at end of year ******************************* Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year ************************************* 2000 1999 Weighted- Average Exercise Price $4.22 5.51 4.27 $5.02 $ — Weighted- Average Exercise Price $ — 4.22 4.22 $4.22 $ — Options — 48,500 (4,000) 44,500 — $ 1.97 Options 44,500 41,750 (19,750) 66,500 — $ 2.84 Exercise prices for options outstanding at December 31, 2000 ranged from $4.22 to $6.22. The weighted- average remaining contractual life of those options was 9.06 years. Non-Plan, Non-Qualifying Option Agreements During 2000 and 1999, the Board of Directors of the Company granted non-plan, non-qualifying options covering 20,000 and 150,000 shares, respectively, of Company common stock (subject to proportionate adjustments in the event of stock dividends, splits and similar corporate transactions) to three individuals in connection with their offers of employment. During 2000 and 1999, 100,000 and 50,000 shares, respectively, were forfeited. The period within which each option will be exercisable is 10 years from the date of grant. The options vest one-fourth on each of the second, third, fourth and ﬁfth anniversaries of the date of grant. A summary of the Company’s non-plan, non-qualifying option activity and related information for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 follows: 2000 1999 Outstanding — beginning of year *********************** Granted ******************************************* Forfeited******************************************* Outstanding — end of year **************************** Exercisable at end of year ***************************** Weighted-average fair value of the 50,000 options granted during 1999 ************************************** Weighted-average fair value of the 100,000 options granted during 1999 ************************************** Weighted- Average Exercise Price $4.22 4.25 4.22 $4.25 $ — Options 100,000 20,000 (100,000) 20,000 — Weighted- Average Exercise Price $ — 4.27 4.38 $4.22 $ — Options — 150,000 (50,000) 100,000 — 2.04 1.97 $ $ Weighted-average fair value of the options granted during 2000 ************************************** $ 1.94 The weighted-average remaining contractual life for options outstanding at December 31, 2000 was 9.13 years. The following weighted-average assumptions for 2000, 1999 and 1998 were used in estimating the fair value of the options granted under the stock option plans and the non-plan, non-qualifying option agreements: risk-free interest rates ranging from 4.65% to 6.45%; dividend yield rate of 0%; volatility factors of the expected market price 34 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) of the Company’s common stock ranging from .245 to .287; and a weighted-average expected life of the option of eight years for those options which vest one-fourth on each of the second, third, fourth and ﬁfth anniversaries of the date of grant and weighted-average expected lives of ﬁve to eight years for the remaining options. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics signiﬁcantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options’ vesting period. The pro forma effect on net income for 2000, 1999 and 1998 is not representative of the pro forma effect on net income in future years because it does not take into consideration pro forma compensation expense related to grants made prior to 1995. The Company’s pro forma information follows (in thousands except for earnings per share information): Pro forma net income******************************* Pro forma earnings per share — basic******************* Pro forma earnings per share — diluted ***************** $3,393 $ 0.55 $ 0.47 $2,117 $ 0.31 $ 0.31 $1,347 $ 0.19 $ 0.18 2000 1999 1998 In total, the Company has 3,641,936 shares which are reserved for issuance under the 1992 Stock Option Plan, the Executive Option Plan, the 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan, a non-plan, non-qualifying option agreement, the 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes, the Series B Notes and the Series C Notes. 8. Preferred Stock The Board of Directors of the Company is empowered, without approval of the stockholders, to cause shares of preferred stock to be issued in one or more series and to establish the number of shares to be included in each such series and the rights, powers, preferences and limitations of each series. There are no provisions in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation specifying the vote required by the holders of preferred stock to take action. All such provisions would be set out in the designation of any series of preferred stock established by the Board of Directors. The bylaws of the Company specify that, when a quorum is present at any meeting, the vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote who are present, in person or by proxy, shall decide any question brought before the meeting, unless a different vote is required by law or the Company’s Articles of Incorporation. Because the Board of Directors has the power to establish the preferences and rights of each series, it may afford the holders of any series of preferred stock, preferences, powers, and rights, voting or otherwise, senior to the right of holders of common stock. The issuance of the preferred stock could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company. The Board of Directors has no present plans to issue any of the preferred stock. 9. Deﬁned Contribution Plan The Company has a 401(k) proﬁt sharing plan covering all employees with three months of service. The Company may make discretionary contributions of up to 50% of employee contributions. The Company recognized no contribution expense for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998. 35 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) 10. Commitments and Contingencies Operating Leases The Company has entered into operating leases for its executive ofﬁces and clinic facilities. In connection with these agreements, the Company incurred rent expense of $4,546,000, $3,815,000 and $3,125,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Several of the leases provide for an annual increase in the rental payment based upon the Consumer Price Index for each particular year. The majority of the leases provide for renewal periods ranging from one to ﬁve years. The agreements to extend the leases specify that rental rates would be adjusted to market rates as of each renewal date. The future minimum lease commitments for the next ﬁve years and in the aggregate as of December 31, 2000 are as follows: 2001******************************************* 2002******************************************* 2003******************************************* 2004******************************************* 2005******************************************* Thereafter*************************************** $ 4,173,000 3,335,000 2,449,000 1,611,000 742,000 57,000 $12,367,000 Employment Agreements At December 31, 2000, the Company had an outstanding employment agreement with one of its executive ofﬁcers for $250,000 annually, subject to adjustment to reﬂect positive performance, for a term extending through February 2002. In addition, the Company has outstanding employment agreements with the managing physical therapist partners of the Company’s physical therapy clinics and with certain other clinic employees which obligate subsidiaries of the Company to pay compensation of $5,699,000 in 2001 and $4,513,000 in the aggregate through 2004. In addition, each employment agreement with the managing physical therapists provides for monthly bonus payments calculated as a percentage of each clinic’s net revenues (not in excess of operating proﬁts) or operating proﬁts. The Company recognized salaries and bonus expense for the managing physical therapists of $9,576,000, $8,073,000 and $7,044,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Each employment agreement provides that the therapist partner can be required to sell his or her partnership interest in the clinic partnership for the amount of his or her capital account upon termination of employment with the clinic partnership before the expiration of the initial term of employment. The employment agreements contain no provisions requiring the purchase by the Company of the therapist partner’s interest in the clinic partnership in the event of death or disability, or after the initial term of employment. In addition, the employment agreements generally include non-competition and non-solicitation provisions which extend through the term of the agreement and for one to two years thereafter. 36 U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) 11. Earnings per Share The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 are as follows: Numerator: 2000 1999 1998 Net income ****************************************** Numerator for basic earnings per share ********************* Effect of dilutive securities: Interest on convertible subordinated notes payable ********** Numerator for diluted earnings per share-income available to common stockholders after assumed conversions *********** $3,735,000 $2,394,000 $1,596,000 $3,735,000 $2,394,000 $1,596,000 466,000 475,000 — $4,201,000 $2,869,000 $1,596,000 Denominator: Denominator for basic earnings per share — weighted-average shares ********************************************* Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options *************************************** Convertible subordinated notes payable ****************** Dilutive potential common shares ************************* Denominator for diluted earnings per share — adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversions *********** Basic earnings per share *********************************** Diluted earnings per share ********************************* 6,153,000 6,800,000 7,222,000 478,000 1,521,000 1,999,000 70,000 1,544,000 1,614,000 264,000 — 264,000 8,152,000 8,414,000 7,486,000 $ $ 0.61 0.52 $ $ 0.35 0.34 $ $ 0.22 0.21 During 2000, 1999 and 1998, the Company had outstanding The Notes, the Series B Notes and the Series C Notes (collectively the ‘‘Notes’’). In November 2000, $850,000 of the Notes were converted into common shares. The Notes were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for 1998 because the effect on the computation was anti-dilutive. 12. Subsequent Events In January 2001, the remaining $2,950,000 of the 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes due June 30, 2003 and the remaining $1,250,000 of the 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes, Series B, due June 30, 2004 was converted into 590,000 and 208,332 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively. In March 2001, the Company repaid the remaining principal balance of $900,000 on the convertible line of credit used to repurchase 1,130,000 of Company common stock in August 2000. 37 Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. The Board of Directors of the Company appointed KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditors effective September 27, 1999. KPMG LLP replaced Ernst & Young LLP, which had served as the Company’s independent auditors since 1992. Ernst & Young LLP was dismissed effective September 27, 1999. The reports issued by Ernst & Young LLP on the Company’s ﬁnancial statements for ﬁscal 1998 did not contain any adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, or any qualiﬁcation or modiﬁcation as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. The decision to change the Company’s independent auditors to KPMG LLP was recommended by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company and then ratiﬁed by the full Board of Directors. During the ﬁscal year ended December 31, 1998 and the subsequent interim period preceding the dismissal of Ernst & Young LLP, there were no disagreements with Ernst & Young LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, ﬁnancial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young LLP, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its reports. PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Ofﬁcers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. The information required by Items 401 and 405 of Regulation S-K is omitted from this Report as the Company intends to ﬁle its deﬁnitive annual meeting proxy materials within 120 days after its ﬁscal year-end and the information to be included therein in response to such Items is incorporated herein by reference. Item 11. Executive Compensation. The information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K is omitted from this Report as the Company intends to ﬁle its deﬁnitive annual meeting proxy materials within 120 days after its ﬁscal year-end and the information to be included therein in response to such Item is incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneﬁcial Owners and Management. The information required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K is omitted from this Report as the Company intends to ﬁle its deﬁnitive annual meeting proxy materials within 120 days after its ﬁscal year-end and the information to be included therein in response to such Item is incorporated herein by reference. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. The information required by Item 404 of Regulation S-K is omitted from this Report as the Company intends to ﬁle its deﬁnitive annual meeting proxy materials within 120 days after its ﬁscal year-end and the information to be included therein in response to such Item is incorporated herein by reference. PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K. (a)(1) The following consolidated ﬁnancial statements of U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. and subsidiaries are included in Item 8: Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 31, 2000 and 1999 Consolidated Statements of Operations — years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity — years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 38 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — December 31, 2000 (2) The following consolidated ﬁnancial statement schedule of U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. is included in Item 14(d): Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted. (3) List of Exhibits 3.1 3.2 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 Articles of Incorporation of the Company (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (33-47019) and incorporated herein by reference). Bylaws of the Company, as amended (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference). Convertible Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement dated June 2, 1993 (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated June 10, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated June 2, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment to Convertible Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement dated March 10, 1994 (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated March 25, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes, Series B (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 5, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference). Registration Agreement for Series B Notes (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 5, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of 8% Convertible Subordinated Notes, Series C (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 5, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference). Registration Agreement for Series C Notes (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 5, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference). 10.8 † 1992 Stock Option Plan, as amended (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (333-64159) and incorporated herein by reference). 10.9 † Executive Option Plan (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (33-63444) and incorporated herein by reference). 10.10† 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). 10.11† Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). 10.12† Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Roy W. Spradlin (ﬁled as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference). 10.13* The Southwest Bank of Texas N.A. Three Year $2.5 million Letter Loan Agreement, dated July 1, 2000. 10.14* The Southwest Bank of Texas N.A. Convertible Line of Credit Note, Exhibit A(i) to the Three Year $2.5 million Letter Loan Agreement dated July 1, 2000. 10.15* The Southwest Bank of Texas N.A. Revolving Line of Credit Note, Exhibit A(ii) to the Three Year $2.5 million Letter Loan Agreement dated July 1, 2000. 16 Change in registrant’s independent public accountants, which occurred on September 27, 1999 (ﬁled on Form 8-K on September 30, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). 39 21 * Subsidiaries of the Registrant. 23.1 * Consent of KPMG LLP (Registration Nos. 33-63446, 33-63444, 33-91004, 33-93040, 333-30071 and 333-64159). 23.2 * Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (Registration Nos. 33-63446, 33-63444, 33-91004, 33-93040, 333-30071 and 333-64159). (a) Reports on Form 8-K No Form 8-K was ﬁled during the quarter ended December 31, 2000. † Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. * Filed herewith. 40 Item 14. (d) SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES COL. A COL. B COL. C Additions COL. D COL. E Description YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000: Reserves and allowances deducted from asset accounts: Allowance for uncollectible accounts ** YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999: Reserves and allowances deducted from asset accounts: Allowance for uncollectible accounts ** YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998: Reserves and allowances deducted from asset accounts: Allowance for uncollectible accounts ** Balance at Beginning of Period Charged to Costs and Expenses Charged to Other Accounts- Describe Deductions- Describe Balance at End of Period $2,014,000 $1,596,000 $ 830,000(1) $2,780,000 $1,692,000 $1,165,000 $ 843,000(1) $2,014,000 $1,595,000 $1,143,000 $1,046,000(1) $1,692,000 (1) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. 41 In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. (Registrant) By: /s/ J. MICHAEL MULLIN J. Michael Mullin, Chief Financial Ofﬁcer (principal ﬁnancial and accounting ofﬁcer) Date: April 12, 2001 In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities as of the date indicated above. By: By: By: By: J. Livingston Kosberg, Chairman of the Board Mark J. Brookner, Vice Chairman of the Board Roy W. Spradlin, President, Chief Executive Ofﬁcer and Director (principal executive ofﬁcer) Bruce D. Broussard, Director By: By: By: By: Marlin W. Johnston, Director James B. Hoover, Director Daniel C. Arnold, Director Albert L. Rosen, Director 42

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above