Our Roots
In Our
Run Deep
Community
2 0 18 A NN UA L R EP OR T
2018 Financial Highlights
Summary Financial Results ($ in millions except for per share amounts)
Net Interest Income
Loan Loss Provision
Noninterest Income
Noninterest Expense
Income Tax Expense
Net Income
Diluted Earnings Per Share
%
29.8
%
13.4
29.8
13.4
%
%
2018
$ 114.2
6.6
11.9
69.3
10.9
$ 39.3
$ 1.60
23.9 %
Loans
Mix
Loans
1
3
.
7
Mix
%
1
3
.
7
%
%
6
.
5
2017
$ 68.5
5.1
7.6
42.8
13.0
$ 15.2
$ 0.80
2016
$ 41.0
2.1
6.5
26.4
6.5
$ 12.6
$ 1.13
23.9 %
Deposit
Mix
%
6
5
.
26.0
26.0
%
%
Deposit
Mix
43.1%
43.1%
44.5%
44.5%
Commercial
Commercial
Consumer
Consumer
Commercial
real estate
Commercial
real estate
Residential
real estate
Residential
real estate
Noninterest
demand accounts
Noninterest
demand accounts
Savings and
money market
Interest-bearing
demand accounts
Interest-bearing
demand accounts
Time deposits
Savings and
money market
Time deposits
Ending balances as of 12/31/2018
Ending balances as of 12/31/2018
Total Assets
Total Assets
Total Assets
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
Total Loans 1
Total Loans 1
Total Loans 1
Total Deposits 1
Total Deposits 1
Total Deposits 1
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
2016
2016
2016
$1,409
$1,409
$1,409
2016
$992
2016
$992
($ in millions)
2016
$992
2016
2016
2016
$1,120
$1,120
$1,120
2017
2017
2017
$2,946
$2,946
$2,946
2017
2017
2017
$2,233
$2,233
$2,233
2017
2017
2017
$2,279
$2,279
$2,279
2018
2018
2018
$3,209
$3,209
$3,209
2018
2018
2018
$2,556
$2,556
$2,556
2018
2018
2018
$2,622
$2,622
$2,622
Ending balances as of year end
Ending balances as of year end
Ending balances as of year end
Ending balances as of year end
Ending balances as of year end
Ending balances as of year end
Ending balances as of year end
Ending balances as of year end
Ending balances as of year end
¹Figures exclude loans and deposits held for sale as of the year ended December 31, 2017
While change is inevitable,
transformation is rare.
The banking industry in America is
management products and services.
ever-changing. While change is
The acquisition would also
inevitable, transformation is rare.
significantly increase our branch
2018 was a transformational year for
footprint in Houston.
Veritex Community Bank. We began
2018 having just completed two large
acquisitions, Sovereign Bank and
Liberty Bank. In May 2018, discussions
with Houston-based Green Bank began
about a possible combination.
We closed the Green Bank acquisition
This merger was a milestone for
Veritex as we continue to move
toward fulfilling our vision to build the
highest-quality, diversified $10+ billion
community bank in Texas. Acquiring
Green Bank was the continuation of
our long-term growth strategy. This
in January 2019. Green Bank had 22
acquisition more than doubled our
banking locations in Texas. With the
size – in employees, assets and
addition of Green Bank, Veritex
branch locations.
Community Bank became one of the
10 largest banks headquartered in
Texas with 47 locations (branches
and loan offices) and total assets
of approximately $7.6 billion.
It’s been a transformational year with
a transformational merger, one that
added over 370 employees, doubled
our branches and expanded our
capabilities. Yes, change is certain,
but there are some things that are
certain, regardless of change.
To ensure that the transition continues
Our bank is special because it is
smoothly, and to provide continuity in
consistent. Even in light of our growth,
leadership, Green Bank’s CFO, Terry
we constantly serve our communities,
Earley, stayed on with Veritex and
we constantly care for our colleagues,
and we constantly take care of the
needs of our clients. This consistency
comes from the dedication of our
management team, our board and
our employees. I am thankful to each
and every one of you. I am, as always,
honored and humbled to serve the
entirety of Veritex Community Bank.
Green Bank was Veritex Holding Inc.’s
seventh acquisition in eight years.
became our CFO in January 2019.
I am also pleased that Donald
Thank you for your continued
With over $4 billion in assets, Green
Perschbacher, Green Bank’s Chief
support and loyalty.
Bank was larger than Veritex. A deal
Credit Officer, has joined our executive
where the seller was bigger than the
team. Geoffrey Greenwade, the
buyer is rare. But with strong counsel
President of Green Bancorp, Inc., also
from my board and management
joined us as president of the Houston
team, we knew that with the addition
market. Six directors from Veritex and
of Green Bank, Veritex would gain
critical scale and expertise in
commercial- and middle-market
lending, as well as new treasury
three directors from Green Bank form
our current board.
C. Malcolm Holland
CEO & President
Veritex Holdings, Inc.
and Veritex Community Bank
This Annual Report includes “forward-looking statements.” See “Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors”
of this Annual Report for additional factors that could cause results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements.
Dallas, Texas
With big-city excitement and quiet suburban
living, Dallas is a mix of Texas pride and
international flair. A culturally diverse city,
Dallasites love the arts, fine dining, nightlife
and shopping.
Both Big City & Small Town
More than anything, Dallas loves the Cowboys, Rangers,
Stars and Mavericks. Residents may casually bump into
their friends at the local Tex-Mex restaurant while
children ride their bikes alongside their parents
as they take an evening jog on the Katy Trail.
A Robust Region
Metropolitan Dallas is home to young
professionals, while the surrounding
suburbs are largely filled with young
families who want both a close-knit
community and easy access to the city.
New residents are flooding into the
Dallas area, swelling the population
to over 5 million people. Quaint and
distinct neighborhoods like Bishop
Arts in Oak Cliff and the Uptown area
in Oak Lawn make up a patchwork of
distinct communities. Veritex Bank is
dedicated to being a part of the fabric
of these neighborhoods, and our
branches take on the character of the
communities we serve.
Lone Star Ideals
In areas such as the Park Cities,
Preston Hollow and Lakewood, home
values can soar into the multimillions.
Middle-class families also thrive
here with many families moving
to the suburbs to take advantage
of the excellent school systems.
Veritex Bank takes an active part
in the growth and health of Dallas
by supporting the schools, athletic
programs, nonprofit organizations
and charities that make its
neighborhoods vibrant.
Dallas Quick Stats:
Acquisitions that brought Veritex into Dallas:
• Professional Bank
• Bank of Las Colinas
• Sovereign Bank
• Fidelity Bank
• Independent Bank of TX
• Green Bank
Total number of Veritex locations in Dallas: 22 (including Honey Grove)
Total Veritex Employees in Dallas: 340+
Thriving Economy
Global powerhouses like ExxonMobil,
Toyota, State Farm and Verizon
proudly call Dallas home. However,
the entrepreneurial spirit is key to the
Dallas economy and small businesses
thrive here. Veritex serves this
business community with 22 locations
spread strategically along the city’s
business core.
Fort Worth, Texas
The cowboy life is alive and well in Fort Worth. The small-town
feel of Friday night football, backyard BBQs and a trip to the
rodeo are mainstays of Fort Worth life. From Sundance Square
and the Stockyards to the terminals at DFW Airport, Fort Worth
friendliness is always apparent with a “good morning” wave or
a “howdy” to strangers.
A Fast Growing American City
Up-and-coming young professionals are discovering that Fort Worth is as
vibrant a workplace as anywhere. One of the fastest-growing cities in America,
Fortune 500 companies dot the business landscape. New master-planned
developments throughout the city are drawing families looking for their dream
home and millennials looking to launch their careers.
History Runs Deep
“Old Money” is still ever-present in
Cowtown. The legacy families of
Fort Worth support the economic
development demands of their city.
Consequently, businesses, schools
and the arts thrive here. In the cultural
district you can find some of the
largest art collections in the country.
Throughout the city you’ll find energetic
professionals, young artists, business
tycoons and affluent retired folks
mixing and mingling.
A Welcoming Community
With 8 branches serving the city, Veritex Bank has deep
roots in Fort Worth. That is reflected in the families we help,
the businesses we serve and the causes we choose to
support. Our close ties to Fort Worth create an environment
that allows us to build long-term relationships and deliver
superior products and outstanding service to our customers.
Business the Cowboy Way
With unemployment well below the national average, the
city’s workforce is well-educated and ready to work. The
Fort Worth business environment is rich in oil and gas;
manufacturing; and aviation, aerospace and defense. With
a dynamic medical and biotech community, Fort Worth is
fostering medical innovations aimed at solving critical life
science challenges.
Fort Worth Quick Stats:
Acquisitions that brought Veritex into Fort Worth:
• Sovereign Bank
• Liberty Bank
• Green Bank
Total number of Veritex locations in Fort Worth 9
Total Veritex Employees in Fort Worth: 55+
Houston, Texas
Confident, independent, fiercely
competitive and boiling over in all
that is Texas, the 6.7 million people
who call Houston home define our
country’s fourth-largest city. From
entrepreneurs cutting their own path
to those who want to climb the
corporate ladder, Houston has it all!
Whether it’s Downtown, the Galleria
area, The Woodlands or down south in
Bay Area, Veritex celebrates Houston’s
distinct and unique neighborhoods.
Young, Diverse Population
The Bayou City is a truly global city. It boasts one of the
youngest, racially, ethnically and culturally diverse
populations in the country. Over 25% of the population is
younger than 20 years old, and the metro area is home to
the third-largest Hispanic population in the country.
Like Houston, Veritex Bank is an inclusive bank made up
of professionals from all backgrounds, faiths and cultures.
Veritex participates in numerous diversity recruitment
events throughout Houston, designed to promote our jobs
to all candidates.
We understand that a diverse employee population
promotes growth, success and knowledge among our
teammates and our customers.
Affordable Living
Tech-Savvy Texans
Houston’s low cost of living attracts new people from across the country and
The high-tech and biotech industries
around the world. Thousands move to Houston a month to become part of its
thrive in Houston. Texas Medical
powerhouse economy.
More than two dozen Fortune 500 corporations call Houston home and the area
is ranked as one of the top manufacturing metropolitan areas in America.
Center, the world’s largest medical
campus, is home to more than 50
health care, education and research
institutions, and Houston is the
legacy aerospace hub with NASA’s
Johnson Space Center.
Houston Quick Stats:
Acquisitions that brought Veritex into Houston:
• Sovereign Bank
• Green Bank
Total number of Veritex locations in Houston: 16
(including Louisville, KY and Austin, TX)
Total Veritex Employees in Houston: 250+
2018 Management Team
C. Malcolm Holland
Chairman of the Board,
CEO and President
LaVonda Renfro
Executive Vice President,
Chief Administrative Officer
William C. Murphy*
Vice Chairman of
the Board
Angela Harper
Executive Vice President,
Chief Risk Officer
Noreen Skelly
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
Jeff Kesler
Executive Vice President,
Chief Lending Officer
Clay Riebe
Executive Vice President,
Chief Credit Officer
Michael Bryan
Executive Vice President,
Chief Information Officer
2018 Board of Directors
C. Malcolm Holland
William C. Murphy*
Pat S. Bolin
Mark C. Griege
Ned N. Fleming III
Gordon Huddleston
John T. Sughrue
Blake Bozman
Gregory B. Morrison
April Box
*Retired midyear, 2018.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018
OR
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-36682
Veritex Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
8214 Westchester Drive, Suite 800
Dallas, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
27-0973566
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
75225
Zip Code
(972) 349 6200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Title of Each Class
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.01
Nasdaq Global Market
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
No
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large
accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
No
The aggregate market value of the shares of common stock held by non-affiliates based on the closing price of the common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market on June 30, 2018 was
approximately $733,310,000.
At February 26, 2019, the Company had outstanding 54,538,601 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
Documents Incorporated By Reference:
Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K to the extent stated herein. Such Definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the
registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC.
Annual Report on Form 10 K
December 31, 2018
Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Signatures
PART I
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
PART II
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
PART IV
Item 15.
2
17
34
35
35
35
35
38
40
75
76
76
77
79
80
80
80
80
80
80
S-1
1
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Our Company
PART I
Except where the context otherwise requires or where otherwise indicated, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-
K to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our company,” the “Company” or “Veritex” refer to Veritex Holdings, Inc. and our wholly-owned banking
subsidiary, Veritex Community Bank, and the terms “Bank” or “Veritex Bank” refer to Veritex Community Bank.
Veritex Holdings, Inc. is a Texas corporation and bank holding company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. Through our
wholly owned subsidiary, Veritex Community Bank, a Texas state chartered bank, we provide relationship-driven commercial
banking products and services tailored to meet the needs of small to medium-sized businesses and professionals. Beginning at our
inception in 2010, we initially targeted customers and focused our acquisitions primarily in the Dallas metropolitan area, which
we consider to be Dallas and the adjacent communities in North Dallas. Our current primary market now includes the broader
Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and the Houston metropolitan area. As we continue to grow, we may expand to other metropolitan
banking markets in Texas.
On January 1, 2019, we completed our acquisition of Green Bancorp, Inc. (“Green”), the parent holding company of
Green Bank, N.A. (“Green Bank”), a national banking association headquartered in Houston, Texas with 21 full-services branches
in the Houston, Dallas and other markets. Under the terms of the definitive agreement for the acquisition, each outstanding share
of Green common stock, Green restricted stock units subject to acceleration vesting upon change in control and Green options
exchanged subject to accelerated vesting upon change in control was converted into the right to receive 0.79 shares of our common
stock, with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares of our common stock. In connection with the definitive agreement, Green was
merged with and into Veritex, with Veritex continuing as the surviving corporation and immediately thereafter, Green Bank was
merged with and into Veritex Bank, with Veritex Bank continuing as the surviving bank. Additionally, certain executive officers
and a number of other key employees of Green have entered into employment agreements with us, which provide for certain
compensatory arrangements and severance entitlements upon an involuntary termination following the closing date of the
acquisition. Our primary reason for the transaction was to further solidify our market share in the Texas market.
After completing the Green acquisition, Veritex became one of the ten largest banks headquartered in Texas. Veritex Bank
now has 43 full-service branch locations in Texas, with a concentration in the Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston metroplexes.
Our business is conducted through one reportable segment, community banking, where we generate the majority of our
revenues from interest income on loans, customer service and loan fees, gains on sale of Small Business Administration (“SBA”)
guaranteed loans and mortgage loans and interest income from securities. We incur interest expense on deposits and other borrowed
funds and noninterest expense, such as salaries and employee benefits and occupancy expenses. We analyze our ability to maximize
income generated from interest-earning assets and expense of our liabilities through our net interest margin. Net interest margin
is a ratio calculated as net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. Net interest income is the difference between
interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such
as deposits and borrowings, which are used to fund those assets.
Our primary customers are small and medium-sized businesses, generally with annual revenues of under $30 million,
and professionals. We believe that these businesses and professionals highly value the local decision-making and relationship-
driven, quality service we provide and our deep, long-term understanding of Texas community banking. As a result of consolidation,
we believe that few locally-based banks are dedicated to providing this level of service to small and medium-sized businesses and
professionals. Our management team’s long-standing presence and experience in Texas gives us unique insight into local market
opportunities and the needs of our customers. This enables us to respond quickly to customers, provide high quality personal
service and develop comprehensive, long-term banking relationships by providing products and services tailored to meet the
individual needs of our customers. This focus and approach enhances our ability to continue to grow organically, successfully
recruit talented bankers and strategically source potential acquisitions in our target markets.
We completed an initial public offering of our common stock in October 2014 as an “emerging growth company” under
the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). As of June 30, 2018, the aggregate worldwide market value
of our common equity held by non-affiliates exceeded the market value required to maintain emerging growth company status.
As a result, beginning on January 1, 2019, we are no longer considered an emerging growth company. Our common stock is listed
on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “VBTX.”
2
Our History and Growth
We have experienced significant growth since commencing banking operations in 2010 through our strategy of pursuing
organic growth and strategic acquisitions. Since inception, we have completed seven whole-bank acquisitions that increased our
market presence within the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex, including an acquisition that resulted in us entering the Houston
metropolitan market in 2017. On August 1, 2017, we acquired Sovereign Bancshares, Inc. (“Sovereign”), a Texas corporation and
the parent company of Sovereign Bank. On December 1, 2017, we acquired Liberty Bancshares, Inc. (“Liberty”), a Texas
corporation and the parent company of Liberty Bank. Upon the completion of the Sovereign acquisition, in order to focus our
growth efforts in the Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston markets, we made the strategic decision to exit the Austin market. On January
1, 2018, we completed the sale of two Austin branches acquired as part of the Sovereign acquisition. These branches were classified
as held for sale on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017. The completion of this branch sale resulted in our
fully exiting the Austin market. As further discussed above, on January 1, 2019, we completed our acquisition of Green, a Texas
corporation and the parent holding company of Green Bank. For further information, see Note 28 - Subsequent Events in the
accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report. After completing the Green
acquisition, Veritex became one of the ten largest banks headquartered in Texas.
Our management team is led by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, C. Malcolm Holland, III, who has overseen
and managed our organic growth and acquisition activity since we commenced banking operations.
The following table summarizes our seven completed acquisitions since inception through December 31, 2018:
Date
Number of
Completed
Branches
Locations
Bank Acquired
Professional Bank, N.A. through Professional Capital, Inc.
September 2010
Fidelity Bank through Fidelity Resources Company
Bank of Las Colinas
Independent Bank of Texas through IBT Bancorp, Inc.
Sovereign Bank through Sovereign Bancshares, Inc.
Liberty Bank through Liberty Bancshares, Inc.
March 2011
October 2011
July 2015
August 2017
December 2017
Park Cities, Lakewood
and Garland
Preston Center,
SMU and Plano
Las Colinas
Irving and Frisco
Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston
and Austin(1)
Fort Worth
3
3
1
2
9
5
Green Bank through Green Bancorp, Inc.
(1) Upon the completion of the Sovereign acquisition, in order to focus our growth efforts in the Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston markets, we made the strategic
decision to exit the Austin market. On January 1, 2018, we completed the sale of two Austin branches acquired as part of the Sovereign acquisition. These branches
were classified as held for sale on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017. The completion of this branch sale resulted in our fully exiting the
Austin market.
Houston and Dallas
January 2019
21
Our Strategy
Our business strategy consists of the following components:
• Continued Organic Growth. Our organic growth strategy focuses on penetrating our markets through our community-
focused, relationship-driven approach to banking. We believe that our current market area provides abundant
opportunities to continue to grow our customer base, increase loans and deposits and expand our overall market share.
Our team of seasoned bankers is an important driver of our organic growth by virtue of its role in further developing
banking relationships with current and potential customers, many of which span more than 20 years. Our market
presidents and relationship managers are incentivized to increase the size of their loan and deposit portfolios and
generate fee income while maintaining strong credit quality. We expect to have continued success adding to our team
of experienced bankers in order to grow our market presence. Also, preserving sound credit underwriting standards as
we grow our loan portfolio will continue to be the foundation of our organic growth strategy.
• Pursue Strategic Acquisitions. We intend to continue to grow through acquisitions. We believe there are banking
organizations in our market area that face significant scale and operational challenges, regulatory pressure, management
succession issues and shareholder liquidity needs, which we believe will present attractive acquisition opportunities
for us in the future. We believe we have developed an experienced and disciplined acquisition and integration approach
capable of identifying candidates, conducting thorough due diligence, determining financial attractiveness and
3
integrating the acquired institution. Utilizing our management team’s experience of acquiring financial institutions,
we believe that we have built a corporate infrastructure capable of supporting additional acquisitions and continued
organic growth. We believe our acquisition experience and our reputation as a successful acquirer position us to capitalize
on potential additional opportunities in the future.
• Improve Operational Efficiency and Increase Profitability. We are committed to maintaining and enhancing
profitability. We employ a systematic and calculated approach to improving our operational efficiency, which in turn,
we believe, increases our profitability. We believe that our scalable infrastructure and efficient operating platform will
allow us to achieve continued growth without incurring significant incremental noninterest expenses and will enhance
our returns.
• Strengthen Our Community Ties. Our officers and employees are heavily involved in civic and community
organizations, and we sponsor numerous activities that benefit our community. Our business development strategy,
which focuses on building market share through personal relationships, as opposed to formal advertising, is consistent
with our customer-centric culture and is a cost-effective approach to developing new relationships and enhancing
existing ones.
Our Banking Services
We focus on delivering a wide variety of relationship-driven commercial banking products and services tailored to meet
the needs of small to medium-sized businesses and professionals. A general discussion of the range of commercial banking products
and other services we offer follows.
Lending Activities. As of December 31, 2018, loans totaled $2.6 billion, representing 79.6% of our total assets. Our loan
portfolio consists of commercial real estate and general commercial loans, residential real estate loans, construction and land loans,
farmland loans and consumer loans.
Our underwriting philosophy seeks to balance our desire to make sound, high quality loans while recognizing that lending
money involves a degree of business risk. Managing credit risk is a company-wide process. Our strategy for credit risk management
includes well-defined, centralized credit policies, uniform underwriting criteria by loan type and ongoing risk monitoring and
review processes for all types of credit exposures. Our processes emphasize early-stage review of loans, regular credit evaluations
and management reviews of loans, which supplement the ongoing and proactive credit monitoring and loan servicing provided
by our loan officers and lending support staff. Our Executive Loan Committee and Directors’ Loan Committee provide company-
wide credit oversight and periodically review all credit risk portfolios to ensure that the risk identification processes are functioning
properly and that our credit standards are followed. In addition, a third-party loan review is performed at least annually to identify
problem assets and confirm our internal risk rating of loans. We attempt to identify potential problem loans early in an effort to
aggressively seek resolution of these situations before the loans become a loss, record any necessary charge-offs promptly and
maintain adequate allowance levels for probable loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
Deposits. Deposits are our principal source of funds for our interest-earning assets. We believe that a critical component
of our success is the importance we place on our deposit services. Our services include typical deposit functions of commercial
banks, safe deposit facilities and commercial and personal banking services, in addition to our loan offerings. We offer a variety
of deposit products and services consistent with the goal of attracting a wide variety of customers, including high net worth
individuals and small to medium-sized businesses. We offer demand, savings, money market and time deposit accounts. We actively
pursue business checking accounts by offering competitive rates, telephone banking, online banking and other convenient services
to our customers. We also pursue commercial deposit and financial institution money market accounts that will benefit from the
utilization of our treasury management services.
Other Products and Services. We offer banking products and services that are attractively priced and we believe easily
understood by customers, with a focus on convenience and accessibility. We offer a full suite of online banking solutions including
access to account balances, online transfers, online bill payment and electronic delivery of customer statements, as well as ATMs,
and banking by telephone, mail and personal appointment. We also offer debit cards, night depository, direct deposit, cashier’s
checks and letters of credit.
We offer a full array of commercial treasury management services designed to be competitive with banks of all sizes.
Treasury management services include balance reporting (including current day and previous day activity), transfers between
accounts, wire transfer initiation, automated clearinghouse origination and stop payments. Cash management deposit products
consist of lockbox, remote deposit capture, positive pay, reverse positive pay, account reconciliation services, zero balance accounts
and sweep accounts, including loan sweep.
4
Investments
The primary objectives of our investment policy are to provide a source of liquidity, to provide an appropriate return on
funds invested, to manage interest rate risk, to meet pledging requirements and to meet regulatory capital requirements. As of
December 31, 2018, the book value of our investment portfolio totaled $262.7 million, with an average yield of 2.67% and an
estimated effective duration of approximately 3.19 years.
Our Market Area
We currently operate in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and the Houston metropolitan area. The economy in these areas
is fueled by the real estate, technology, financial services, insurance, transportation, manufacturing, health care and energy sectors.
These market areas are among the most vibrant in the United States with rapidly growing populations, a high level of job growth,
an affordable cost of living and a pro-growth business climate.
Competition
The Texas market for banking services is highly competitive. Texas’ largest banking organizations are headquartered
outside of Texas and are controlled by organizations outside the state. We compete with numerous commercial banks, savings
institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, and brokerage and
investment banking firms operating locally and nationally, and more recently with financial technology companies that rely on
technology to provide financial services. We believe that many small to medium-sized businesses and professionals are interested
in banking with a company headquartered in, and with decision-making authority based in, Texas. We also believe these customers
seek established Texas bankers who have the expertise to act as trusted advisors regarding their banking needs. We believe Veritex
can offer customers more responsive and personalized service. We also believe that, if we service these customers properly, we
will be able to establish long-term relationships and provide multiple products to our customers, thereby enhancing our profitability.
See “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Veritex’s Business - Veritex faces strong competition from financial services companies and
other companies that offer banking services, which could adversely affect its business, financial condition, and results of operations.”
in Item 1A of this report.
Employees
As of December 31, 2018, we had 327 full-time employees and three part-time employees. None of our employees are
represented by a union. In August 2018, the Bank was named one of the “Best Banks to Work For 2018” by the American Banker.
We strive to maintain a culture where people are rewarded for hard work and share in the benefits of the success of the Company.
Our Corporate Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 8214 Westchester Drive, Suite 800, Dallas, Texas 75225, and our telephone
number is (972) 349-6200. Our website is www.veritexbank.com. We make available at this address, free of charge, our annual
report on Form 10-K, our annual reports to shareholders, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and
amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
“Exchange Act”) as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. These
documents are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The information contained on or accessible from our website
does not constitute a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is not incorporated by reference herein.
Regulation and Supervision
The U.S. banking industry is highly regulated under federal and state law. These laws and regulations affect the operations
and performance of the Company and its subsidiaries and are intended primarily for the protection of the Deposit Insurance Fund
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), the bank’s depositors and the public, rather than our shareholders or
creditors.
Statutes, regulations and policies limit the activities in which the Company may engage and how it conducts certain
permitted activities. Further, the bank regulatory system imposes reporting and information collection obligations. The Company
incurs significant costs relating to compliance with these laws and regulations. Banking statutes, regulations and policies are
continually under review by federal and state legislatures and regulatory agencies, and a change in them, including changes in
how they are interpreted or implemented, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
5
The material statutory and regulatory requirements that are applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries are summarized
below. The description below is not intended to summarize all laws and regulations applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries,
and is based upon the statutes, regulations, policies, interpretive letters and other written guidance that are in effect as of the date
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Bank and Bank Holding Company Regulation
The Bank is a Texas-chartered banking association, the deposits of which are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund of
the FDIC up to applicable legal limits. The Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System; therefore, the Bank is subject to
ongoing and comprehensive supervision, regulation, examination and enforcement by the Texas Department of Banking (the
“TDB”) and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”).
A company that acquires ownership or control of 25% or more of any class of voting securities of a bank or bank holding
company, that controls the election of a majority of the board of directors of such an institution, or that exercises a controlling
influence over the affairs of such an institution is a bank holding company and must obtain the prior approval of and later register
with the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC Act”). A company that acquires
less than 25% but more than 5% of a class of voting securities may be required to enter into passivity commitments with the
Federal Reserve. Bank holding companies are subject to regulation, examination, supervision and enforcement by the Federal
Reserve under the BHC Act. The Federal Reserve’s jurisdiction also extends to any company that is directly or indirectly controlled
by a bank holding company.
As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to ongoing and comprehensive supervision, regulation, examination
and enforcement by the Federal Reserve. As a bank holding company of a Texas state chartered bank, the Company is also subject
to supervision, regulation, examination and enforcement by the TDB.
Broad Supervision, Examination and Enforcement Powers
A principal objective of the U.S. bank regulatory system is to protect depositors by ensuring the financial safety and
soundness of banking organizations. To that end, the banking regulators have broad regulatory, examination and enforcement
authority. The regulators regularly examine the operations of banking organizations. In addition, banking organizations are subject
to periodic reporting requirements. Insured depository institutions with total assets of $500 million or more must submit annual
audit reports prepared by independent auditors to federal and state regulators. In some instances, the audit report of the insured
depository institution’s bank holding company can be used to satisfy this requirement. Auditors must receive examination reports,
supervisory agreements and reports of enforcement actions.
The regulators have various remedies available if they determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality,
earnings prospects, management, liquidity or other aspects of a banking organization’s operations are unsatisfactory. The regulators
may also take action if they determine that the banking organization or its management is violating or has violated any law or
regulation. The regulators have the power to, among other things:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
require affirmative actions to correct any violation or practice;
issue administrative orders that can be judicially enforced;
direct increases in capital;
direct the sale of subsidiaries or other assets;
limit dividends and distributions;
restrict growth;
assess civil monetary penalties;
remove officers and directors; and
terminate deposit insurance
6
Engaging in unsafe or unsound practices or failing to comply with applicable laws, regulations and supervisory agreements
could subject us and our subsidiaries or their officers, directors and institution-affiliated parties to the remedies described above
and other sanctions. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Veritex’s Industry and Regulation”.
The Dodd-Frank Act and the Economic Growth, Regulatory Reform, and Consumer Protection Act (“EGRRCPA”)
On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed
into law. The Dodd-Frank Act imposed significant regulatory and compliance requirements, including the designation of certain
financial companies as systemically important financial companies, enhanced oversight of credit rating agencies, the imposition
of increased capital, leverage and liquidity requirements, and numerous other provisions designed to improve supervision and
oversight of, and strengthen safety and soundness within, the financial services sector.
Various provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act may affect our business and include, but may not be limited to the following:
• Source of strength. Under Federal Reserve policy, bank holding companies have historically been required to act as a
source of financial and managerial strength to each of their banking subsidiaries, and the Dodd-Frank Act codified this
policy as a statutory requirement. As a result of this requirement, in the future we could be required to provide financial
assistance to the Bank should it experience financial distress and in circumstances in which we might not otherwise
do so.
• Mortgage loan origination. The Dodd-Frank Act authorized the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”)
to establish certain minimum standards for the origination of residential mortgages, including a determination of the
borrower’s ability to repay a residential mortgage loan. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, financial institutions may not make
a residential mortgage loan unless it makes a “reasonable and good faith determination” that the consumer has a
“reasonable ability” to repay the loan. The Dodd-Frank Act allows borrowers to raise certain defenses to foreclosure
but provides a full or partial safe harbor from such defenses for loans that are “qualified mortgages.” The CFPB has
promulgated final rules to, among other things, specify the types of income and assets that may be considered in the
ability to repay determination, the permissible sources for verification and the required methods of calculating the
loan’s monthly payments. The rules extend the requirement that creditors verify and document a borrower’s income
and assets to include all information that creditors rely on in determining repayment ability. The rules also provide
further examples of third party documents that may be relied on for such verification, such as government records and
check cashing or funds transfer service receipts. The rules set conditions for “qualified mortgages,” including
underwriting standards (for example, a borrower’s debt to income ratio may not exceed 43%) and limits on the terms
of their loans. Points and fees are subject to a relatively stringent cap, and are defined to include a wide array of payments
that may be made in the course of closing a loan. Certain loans, including interest only loans and negative amortization
loans, cannot be qualified mortgages. EGRRCPA modifies certain of these requirements by, among other things, creating
a safe harbor from the ability-to-repay standards for certain mortgage loans made by a bank with less than $10 billion
in total consolidated assets.
• Risk retention. The Federal Reserve, together with the FDIC, the SEC, the Federal Housing Finance Agency and the
Department of Housing and Urban Development issued a final rule in 2014 to implement the risk retention requirement
mandated by Section 941 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The risk retention requirement generally requires a securitizer to
retain no less than 5% of the credit risk in assets it sells into a securitization and prohibits a securitizer from directly
or indirectly hedging or otherwise transferring the credit risk that the securitizer is required to retain, subject to limited
exemptions. One significant exemption is for securities entirely collateralized by “qualified residential
mortgages” (“QRMs”), which are loans deemed to have a lower risk of default. The rule defines QRMs to have the
same meaning as the term “qualified mortgage,” as defined by the CFPB. In addition, the rule provides for reduced
risk retention requirements for qualifying securitizations of commercial loans, commercial real estate loans and auto
loans.
• Imposition of restrictions on swaps activities. The Dodd-Frank Act imposes a new regulatory structure on the over-
the-counter derivatives market, including requirements for clearing, exchange trading, capital, margin, reporting and
record keeping. This framework covers any person required to register as a “major swap participant,” “swap dealer,”
“major security-based swap participant” or a “security-based swap dealer.” We are treated as an end user and are not
subject directly to many of these requirements, but the requirements may affect the nature of the business we conduct
with persons required to register.
7
• Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The Dodd-Frank Act created the CFPB, which is tasked with establishing and
implementing rules and regulations under certain federal consumer protection laws with respect to the conduct of
providers of certain consumer financial products and services. The CFPB has rulemaking authority over many of the
statutes governing products and services offered to bank and thrift consumers. For banking organizations with assets
of $10 billion or more, the CFPB has exclusive rule-making, examination, and primary enforcement authority under
federal consumer financial laws. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt consumer protection laws
and regulations that are stricter than those regulations promulgated by the CFPB. Compliance with any such new
regulations would increase our cost of operations. The change in leadership at the CFPB in 2017, the release of a new
strategic plan and the publication of formal requests for information on possible changes to its general supervisory
program and its enforcement program suggest that the CFPB may be taking a different approach to its implementation
of consumer financial protection laws than the agency did when it first began operations, but we are unable to predict
what effect, if any, these changes may have on the Bank.
• Deposit insurance. The Dodd-Frank Act made permanent the general $250,000 deposit insurance limit for insured
deposits. Amendments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDIA”) also revised the assessment base against
which an insured depository institution’s deposit insurance premiums paid to the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund will
be calculated. Under the amendments, the assessment base is no longer the institution’s deposit base, but rather its
average consolidated total assets less its average tangible equity. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act made changes to
the minimum designated reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund, increasing the minimum from 1.15% to 1.35%
of the estimated amount of total insured deposits, and eliminating the requirement that the FDIC pay dividends to
depository institutions when the reserve ratio exceeds certain thresholds. For a discussion of the assessments the Bank
pays to the FDIC, see “Deposit Insurance and Deposit Insurance Assessments” below.
• Transactions with affiliates and insiders. The Dodd-Frank Act generally enhanced the restrictions on transactions with
affiliates under Section 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, including an expansion of the definition of “covered
transactions” and clarification regarding the amount of time for which collateral requirements regarding covered credit
transactions must be satisfied. Insider transaction limitations were expanded through the strengthening of loan
restrictions to insiders and the expansion of the types of transactions subject to the various limits, including derivatives
transactions, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending or borrowing transactions.
• Corporate governance. The Dodd-Frank Act addresses many investor protections, corporate governance and executive
compensation matters that will affect most U.S. publicly traded companies, including the Company. The Dodd-Frank
Act: (i) grants shareholders of U.S. publicly traded companies an advisory vote on executive compensation, (ii) enhances
independence requirements for compensation committee members, (iii) requires companies listed on national securities
exchanges to adopt incentive-based compensation clawback policies for executive officers and (iv) provides the SEC
with authority to adopt proxy access rules that would allow shareholders of publicly traded companies to nominate
candidates for election as a director and have those nominees included in a company’s proxy materials. For so long as
we were an emerging growth company, we took advantage of the provisions of the JOBS Act, that allowed us to not
seek a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements. Since we are no longer
an emerging growth company, we will need to seek these non-binding advisory votes at our next annual meeting of
shareholders.
In May 2018, EGRRCPA was signed into law. While EGRRCPA preserves the fundamental elements of the post Dodd-
Frank regulatory framework, it includes modifications that are intended to result in meaningful regulatory relief both from certain
Dodd-Frank provisions and from certain regulatory capital rules for smaller and certain regional banking organizations. Among
other things, EGRRCPA exempts us from the Volcker Rule, allows us to avoid the risk-based capital rules if we maintain a specific
“community bank leverage ratio,” revises the capital treatment of certain commercial real estate loans, and amends certain Truth
in Lending Act requirements for residential mortgage loans.
The Volcker Rule
Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act, popularly known as the “Volcker Rule,” generally prohibits “banking entities” from
engaging in “proprietary trading” and making investments and conducting certain other activities with private equity funds and
hedge funds. These prohibitions apply to banking entities of any size, including us and the Bank. In 2013, the Federal Reserve,
together with the FDIC, the Office of the Comptroller of the Current (the “OCC”), the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, issued regulations to implement the Volcker Rule. EGRRCPA exempts banks with total consolidated assets of $10
billion or less from the Volcker Rule. This exemption took effect upon enactment. The statute did not formally exempt bank holding
companies under the $10 billion threshold from the Volcker Rule, but the federal banking agencies have pledged not to enforce it
8
against these companies. Although we do not believe we engaged in any activities covered by the Volcker Rule, the exemption
eliminates any need for a compliance program. We have reviewed the scope of the Volcker Rule and have determined that we do
not have any activities or investments that are subject to the requirements of the rule at this time.
Notice and Approval Requirements Related to Control
Federal and state banking laws impose notice, application, approval or non-objection and ongoing regulatory requirements
on any shareholder or other person that controls or seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of an FDIC-insured depository
institution. In addition to requirements that may apply under the BHC Act, described above under “Bank and Bank Holding
Company Regulation,” the Change in Bank Control Act and the Texas Banking Act require regulatory filings by a shareholder
or other person that seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of an FDIC-insured depository institution. The determination of
whether a person “controls” a depository institution or its holding company is based on all of the facts and circumstances surrounding
the investment. As a general matter, a person is deemed to control a depository institution or other company if the person owns
or controls 25% or more of any class of voting stock. Subject to rebuttal, a person is presumed to control a depository institution
or other company if the person owns or controls 10% or more of any class of voting stock and other regulatory criteria are met.
The holdings of certain affiliated persons, or persons acting in concert, are typically aggregated for the purpose of applying the
10% and 25% thresholds.
In addition, except under limited circumstances, bank holding companies are prohibited from acquiring, without prior
approval, control of any other bank or bank holding company or all or substantially all the assets thereof; or more than 5% of the
voting shares of a bank or bank holding company that is not already a subsidiary.
Permissible Activities and Investments
Banking laws generally restrict our ability to engage in, or acquire more than 5% of the voting shares of a company
engaged in, activities other than those determined by the Federal Reserve to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper
incident thereto. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999 (the “GLB Act”) expanded the scope of
permissible activities to include those that are financial in nature or incidental or complementary to a financial activity for a bank
holding company that elects to be a financial holding company, which requires the satisfaction of certain conditions. We have not
elected financial holding company status.
In addition, as a general matter, we must receive prior regulatory approval before establishing or acquiring a depository
institution or, in certain cases, a non-bank entity.
The Texas Constitution, as amended in 1986, provides that a Texas-chartered bank has the same rights and privileges that
are or may be granted to national banks domiciled in Texas. To the extent that the Texas laws and regulations may have allowed
state-chartered banks to engage in a broader range of activities than national banks, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) has operated to limit such activities. FDICIA provides that no state bank or subsidiary
thereof may engage as a principal in any activity in which national banks are not permitted to engage, unless the institution complies
with applicable capital requirements and the FDIC determines that the activity poses no significant risk to the Deposit Insurance
Fund of the FDIC. In general, statutory restrictions on the activities of banks are aimed at protecting the safety and soundness of
depository institutions.
Branching
Texas law provides that a Texas-chartered bank can establish a branch anywhere in Texas provided that the branch is
approved in advance by the TDB. The branch must also be approved by the Federal Reserve. The regulators consider a number
of factors, including financial history, capital adequacy, earnings prospects, character of management, needs of the community
and consistency with corporate powers. The Dodd-Frank Act permits insured state banks to engage in de novo interstate branching
if the laws of the state where the new branch is to be established would permit the establishment of the branch if it were chartered
by such state.
Regulatory Capital Requirements and Capital Adequacy
The bank regulators view capital levels as important indicators of an institution’s financial soundness. As a general matter,
FDIC-insured depository institutions and their holding companies are required to maintain minimum capital relative to the amount
and types of assets they hold. The final supervisory determination on an institution’s capital adequacy is based on the regulator’s
assessment of numerous factors. As a bank holding company and a state-chartered member bank, we and the Bank are subject to
several regulatory capital requirements.
9
Capital requirements have evolved over the last 30 years. The current requirement took effect on January 1, 2015, with
phase-in periods for certain requirements; as of January 9, 2019, all of the requirements were fully phased in. The requirements
are based on a set of international standards popularly known as Basel III. By virtue of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Company is
broadly subject to the same requirements that apply to the Bank.
Under the current capital rules, the Bank must maintain “tangible” capital equal to 1.5% of average total assets, common
equity Tier 1 equal to 4.5% of risk-weighted assets, Tier 1 capital equal to 6% of risk-weighted assets, total capital (a combination
of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital) equal to 8% of risk-weighted assets, and a leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to average total consolidated
assets equal to 4%. The regulations also modified the thresholds necessary for a savings association to be deemed well or adequately
capitalized; these adjustments are discussed below under “Prompt Corrective Action.”
Under the rules, the components of common equity Tier 1 capital include common stock instruments (including related
surplus), retained earnings, and certain minority interests in the equity accounts of fully consolidated subsidiaries (subject to certain
limitations). A bank must make certain deductions from and adjustments to the sum of these components to determine common
equity Tier 1 capital. The required deductions for banks include, among other items, goodwill (net of associated deferred tax
liabilities), certain other intangible assets (net of deferred tax liabilities), certain deferred tax assets, gains on sale in connection
with securitization exposures and investments in and extensions of credit to certain subsidiaries engaged in activities not permissible
for national banks. The adjustments require several complex calculations and include adjustments to the amounts of deferred tax
assets, mortgage servicing assets, and certain investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions that are includable
in common equity Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier 1 capital includes noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus,
and certain minority interests in the equity accounts of fully consolidated subsidiaries not included in common equity Tier 1 capital,
subject to certain limitations. Tier 2 capital includes subordinated debt with a minimum original maturity of five years, related
surplus, certain minority interests in in the equity accounts of fully consolidated subsidiaries not included in Tier 1 capital (subject
to certain limitations), and limited amounts of a bank’s allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”). Certain deductions and
adjustments are necessary for both additional Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital. Tangible capital has the same definition as Tier 1
capital. Under the final rules, banking organizations were provided a one-time option in their initial regulatory financial report
filed after January 1, 2015, to remove certain components of accumulated other comprehensive income from the computation of
common equity regulatory capital.
The risk weights used for the risk-based capital calculations are 0% for cash, U.S. government securities, and certain
other assets, 50% for qualifying residential mortgage exposures, 100% for corporate exposures and non-qualifying mortgage loans
and certain other assets, and 600% for certain equity exposures. Loans that are past due by 90 days or more and commercial real
estate (“CRE”) loans either with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of the supervisory ceilings or without a certain amount of contributed
capital from the borrower must be risk-weighted at 150%. EGRRCPA narrowed the class of CRE loans subject to the 150% risk
weight; CRE loans otherwise are risk weighted at 100%. Mortgage servicing assets and deferred tax assets that are not deducted
from common equity Tier 1 capital in accordance with the adjustment stated above are risk-weighted at 250%.
At December 31, 2018, the Bank was in compliance with the minimum common equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital, total
capital, tangible capital and leverage capital requirements. See Note 23 – Capital Requirements and Restrictions on Retained
Earnings in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for more details.
The Company is subject to similar minimum capital requirements as the Bank, except that the Company is not subject
to a tangible capital ratio requirement. As a bank holding company with less than $15 billion in total assets, we may include certain
existing trust preferred securities and cumulative perpetual preferred stock in regulatory capital while other instruments are
disallowed. As of December 31, 2018, the Company was in compliance with the minimum common equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1
capital, total capital and leverage capital requirements. For the Company to be “well capitalized,” the Bank must be well capitalized
and the Company must not be subject to any written agreement, order, capital directive or prompt corrective action directive issued
by the Federal Reserve to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure. As of December 31, 2018, the Company
met all the requirements to be deemed well-capitalized.
In addition, applicable rules subject a banking organization to certain limitations on capital distributions and discretionary
bonus payments to executive officers if the organization does not maintain a “capital conservation buffer” of common equity Tier
1 capital in an amount greater than 2.5% of its total risk-weighted assets. This requirement is still phasing in and took full effect
on January 1, 2019. In 2018 the buffer was 1.875%. The effect of the fully phased-in capital conservation buffer is to increase
the minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ratio to 7.0%, the minimum tier 1 risk-based capital ratio to 8.5% and the minimum
total risk-based capital ratio to 10.5%, for banking organizations seeking to avoid the limitations on capital distributions and
discretionary bonus payments to executive officers.
10
Banks (and bank holding companies) with less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets may be exempt from the risk-
based and leverage capital requirements as well as the capital conservation buffer if the federal banking agencies finalize a rule
on the community bank leverage ratio (“CBLR”) and if the banks meet the requirements of the rule. EGRRCPA required the
agencies to establish this ratio within a range of 8% to 10%. The agencies have proposed a rule with a 9% CBLR that would be
available to banking firms under the $10 billion threshold provided that certain assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet items were
below certain ceilings.
These capital requirements are minimum supervisory ratios generally applicable to banking organizations. The Federal
Reserve (and the other federal bank regulatory agencies) may set capital requirements for a particular banking organization that
are higher than the minimum ratios when circumstances warrant. Federal Reserve guidelines also provide that banking
organizations experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially
above the minimum supervisory levels, without significant reliance on intangible assets.
Prompt Corrective Action
In addition to the capital rules, the Bank is subject to the “prompt corrective action” (“PCA”) regime. This regime subjects
an insured depository institution to increasingly stringent restrictions and supervisory actions by its primary federal regulator, if
the institution becomes undercapitalized and its financial condition continues to deteriorate. Each U.S. insured depository
institution falls within one of five assigned capital categories: “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,”
“significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized.” An insured depository institution is deemed to be “well
capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5% or greater,
a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater and the institution is not subject to an
order, written agreement, capital directive or prompt corrective action directive to meet and maintain a specific level for any capital
measure. A well-capitalized institution is not subject to any restrictions on its activities and enjoys certain regulatory advantages
such as streamlined processing of many applications. A depository institution is deemed to be “adequately capitalized” if it has
a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of 6.0% or greater and a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater and does not meet the criteria for a “well capitalized” bank.
Adequately-capitalized status is necessary in order to undertake a variety of regulated activities. An institution that is adequately
capitalized but not well capitalized may be restricted in its ability to rely on brokered deposits, discussed further below under
“Brokered Deposits.” The pending CBLR proposal would treat a bank that met the CBLR requirements as well capitalized without
reference to any of the current PCA ratios.
A depository institution is “under capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0%, a common equity
Tier 1 capital ratio of less than 4.5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0% or a leverage ratio of less than 4.0%. A
depository institution is “significantly undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a common equity
Tier 1 capital ratio of less than 3.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0% or a leverage ratio of less than 3.0%. An
institution is critically undercapitalized if its ratio of tangible equity to total assets is equal to or less than 2.0%. Significantly
undercapitalized institutions are subject to a wider array of adverse agency actions than undercapitalized institutions. A critically
undercapitalized institution is likely to be place in receivership if it does not find a merger partner. Under certain circumstances,
an institution may be treated as if the institution were in the next lower capital category.
A banking institution that is undercapitalized is required to submit a capital restoration plan. The capital restoration plan
will not be accepted by the regulators unless each company having control of the undercapitalized institution provides a performance
guarantee of the subsidiary’s compliance with the capital restoration plan up to the lesser of 5% of the bank’s total assets or the
amount necessary to bring the bank into compliance with capital requirements as of the time it fell out of compliance.
Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject an institution to a variety of enforcement remedies by federal bank
regulatory agencies, including termination of deposit insurance upon notice and hearing, restrictions on certain business activities,
and appointment of the FDIC as conservator or receiver. As of December 31, 2018, the Bank met the requirements to be “well
capitalized” under the prompt corrective action regulations.
11
Regulatory Limits on Dividends and Distributions
As a bank holding company, we are subject to certain restrictions on paying dividends under applicable federal and Texas
laws and regulations. The Federal Reserve has issued a policy statement that provides that a bank holding company should not
pay dividends unless (i) its net income over the last four quarters (net of dividends paid) has been sufficient to fully fund the
dividends, (ii) the prospective rate of earnings retention appears to be consistent with the capital needs, asset quality and overall
financial condition of the bank holding company and its subsidiaries and (iii) the bank holding company will continue to meet
minimum required capital adequacy ratios. Accordingly, a bank holding company should not pay cash dividends that exceed its
net income or that can only be funded in ways that weaken the bank holding company’s financial health, such as by borrowing.
The Dodd-Frank Act imposes, and Basel III results in, additional restrictions on the ability of banking institutions to pay dividends.
Substantially all of our income, and a principal source of our liquidity, are dividends from the Bank. Bank dividend
activity is governed by federal and state laws, regulations and policies.
Capital adequacy requirements serve to limit the amount of dividends that may be paid by the Bank. Under Federal
Reserve guidelines, the Bank may pay dividends to us only from net income and retained earnings and may not impair its permanent
capital, subject to certain exceptions. Under the FDIA, an insured depository institution such as the Bank is prohibited from making
capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, if, after making such distribution, the institution would become
“undercapitalized.” The Federal Reserve may further restrict the payment of dividends by requiring the Bank to maintain a higher
level of capital than would otherwise be required to be adequately capitalized for regulatory purposes. Payment of dividends by
the Bank also may be restricted at any time at the discretion of the appropriate regulator if it deems the payment to constitute an
unsafe and unsound banking practice. As noted above, the capital conservation buffer created under the final capital rules, when
fully implemented, may also have the effect of limiting the payment of capital distributions from the Bank.
On January 28, 2019, Veritex Holdings, Inc. announced that its Board of Directors declared the initiation of a regular
quarterly cash dividend of $0.125 per share on our outstanding common stock. The dividend will be paid on or after February
21, 2019 to shareholders of record as of February 7, 2019. This is the first common stock dividend declared by the Board of
Directors of the Company and reflects the strength of the Company's performance over the last fiscal year and the higher level
of organic capital generation that resulted from the lower effective tax rates in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
Reserve Requirements
Pursuant to regulations of the Federal Reserve, all banking organizations are required to maintain average daily reserves
at mandated ratios against their transaction accounts. In addition, reserves must be maintained on certain non-personal time deposits.
These reserves must be maintained in the form of vault cash or in an account at a Federal Reserve Bank.
Limits on Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders
Insured depository institutions are subject to restrictions on their ability to conduct transactions with affiliates and other
related parties. Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act imposes quantitative limits, qualitative requirements, and collateral standards
on certain transactions by an insured depository institution with, or for the benefit of, its affiliates. Transactions covered by Section
23A include loans, extensions of credit, investment in securities issued by an affiliate, and acquisitions of assets from an affiliate.
Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act requires that most types of transactions by an insured depository institution with, or for
the benefit of, an affiliate be on terms substantially the same or at least as favorable to the insured depository institution as if the
transaction were conducted with an unaffiliated third party.
As noted above, the Dodd-Frank Act generally enhances the restrictions on transactions with affiliates under Section 23A
and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, including an expansion of the definition of “covered transactions” and a clarification regarding
the amount of time for which collateral requirements regarding covered credit transactions must be satisfied. The ability of the
Federal Reserve to grant exemptions from these restrictions is also narrowed by the Dodd-Frank Act, including by requiring
coordination with other bank regulators.
The Federal Reserve’s Regulation O regulations impose restrictions and procedural requirements in connection with the
extension of credit by an insured depository institution to directors, executive officers, principal shareholders and their related
interests. Section 18(z) of the FDIA limits purchases and sales of assets between an insured depository institution and its executive
officers, directors, and principal shareholders.
12
Brokered Deposits
The FDIA restricts the use of brokered deposits by certain depository institutions. A well capitalized insured depository
institution may solicit and accept, renew or roll over any brokered deposit without restriction. An adequately capitalized insured
depository institution may not accept, renew or roll over any brokered deposit unless it has applied for and been granted a waiver
of this prohibition by the FDIC. The FDIC may grant a waiver upon a finding that the acceptance of brokered deposits does not
constitute an unsafe or unsound practice with respect to such institution. The rates that an adequately capitalized institution with
a waiver may pay on brokered deposits may not exceed certain ceilings. An “undercapitalized insured depository institution” may
not accept, renew or roll over any brokered deposit. At December 31, 2018, the Company is considered a well capitalized insured
depository institution with total brokered deposits of $234.2 million.
Concentrated Commercial Real Estate Lending Guidance
The federal banking agencies, including the Federal Reserve, have promulgated guidance governing financial institutions
with concentrations in commercial real estate lending. The guidance provides that a bank has a concentration in commercial real
estate lending if (i) total reported loans for construction, land development and other land represent 100% or more of total risk-
based capital or (ii) total reported loans secured by multifamily and non-farm residential properties and loans for construction,
land development and other land represent 300% or more of total risk-based capital and the bank’s commercial real estate loan
portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months. Owner-occupied commercial real estate loans are excluded from
this second category. If a concentration is present, management must employ heightened risk management practices that address
the following key elements: board and management oversight and strategic planning, portfolio management, development of
underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing, and maintenance of increased
capital levels as needed to support the level of commercial real estate lending. At December 31, 2018, total reported loans for
construction, land development and other land represented over 100% of total capital, indicating a concentration in commercial
real estate lending. At December 31, 2018, our management believes that it is in compliance with the requirements and guidance
of federal banking agencies, including the Federal Reserve, for institutions with concentrations in commercial real estate lending.
Examination and Examination Fees
The Federal Reserve periodically examines and evaluates state member banks. Based on such an evaluation, the Bank,
among other things, may be required to revalue its assets and establish specific reserves to compensate for the difference between
the Bank’s assessment and that of the Federal Reserve. The TDB also conducts examinations of state banks but may accept the
results of a federal examination in lieu of conducting an independent examination. In addition, the Federal Reserve and TDB may
elect to conduct a joint examination. The TDB charges fees to recover the costs of examining Texas chartered banks, as well as
filing fees for certain applications and other filings. The Dodd-Frank Act provides various agencies with the authority to assess
additional supervision fees.
Deposit Insurance and Deposit Insurance Assessments
The Bank’s deposits are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund, or DIF, to the maximum extent permitted by the FDIC.
This amount is $250,000 per depositor per account. As insurer, the FDIC is authorized to conduct examinations of, and to require
reporting by, insured institutions. The agency also may prohibit any insured institution from engaging in any activity determined
by regulation or order to pose a serious threat to the FDIC. The FDIC has the authority to initiate enforcement actions against
savings associations, after giving the OCC an opportunity to take such action.
Insured depository institutions fund the DIF through quarterly assessments. The FDIC has adopted a risk-based premium
system to calculate the assessments. All institutions with deposits insured by the FDIC are required to pay assessments to fund
interest payments on bonds issued by the Financing Corporation, a mixed-ownership government corporation established to
recapitalize the predecessor to the DIF. These assessments will continue until the Financing Corporation bonds mature in 2019.
The FDIC has revised its methodology for determining assessments from time to time. The current methodology, which
has been in place since the third quarter of 2016, has a range of assessment rates from 3 basis points to 30 basis points on insured
deposits. All insured depository institutions with the exception of large and complex banking organizations are assigned to one
of three risk categories based on their composite CAMELS ratings. Each of the three risk categories has a range of rates, and the
rate for a particular institution is determined based on seven financial ratios and the weighted average of its component CAMELS
ratings. The FDIC may adjust assessment rates downward as the reserve ratio of the DIF exceeds 2.0% and higher thresholds. On
September 30, 2018, the DIF exceeded its reserve ratio and, as such, the assessment regulations provide that after the reserve ratio
reaches 1.38% (and provided that it remains at least 1.38%), the FDIC will automatically apply credits to small banks (total
consolidated assets of less than $10 billion) to reduce small banks’ regular deposit insurance assessments up to the full amounts
13
of their assessments or the full amount of their credits, whichever is less. Credits are awarded to any bank that was a small bank
at some point during the credit calculation period. If a bank acquires another bank that is owed credits through merger or
consolidation after the reserve ratio is exceeded, the acquiring bank is successor to any credits of the acquired small bank.
Future changes in insurance premiums could have an adverse effect on operating expenses and results of operations and
we cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.
The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any insured depository institution, including us, if it determines after
a hearing that the institution has engaged or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to
continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, order or any condition imposed by an agreement with the
FDIC. It also may suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing process for the permanent termination of insurance,
if the institution has no tangible capital. Management is not aware of any existing circumstances that would result in termination
of our deposit insurance.
Depositor Preference
The FDIA provides that, in the event of the “liquidation or other resolution” of an insured depository institution, the
claims of depositors of the institution (including the claims of the FDIC as subrogee of insured depositors) and certain claims for
administrative expenses of the FDIC as a receiver will have priority over other general unsecured claims against the institution.
If the Company invests in or acquires an insured depository institution that fails, insured and uninsured depositors, along with the
FDIC, will have priority in payment ahead of unsecured, non-deposit creditors, including the Company, with respect to any
extensions of credit they have made to such insured depository institution.
Anti-Money Laundering and OFAC
Insured depository institutions and several other classes of financial institutions are subject to regulations under the Bank
Secrecy Act and the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 designed to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The
principal requirements for an insured depository institution include (i) establishment of an anti-money laundering program that
includes training and audit components; (ii) establishment of a "know your customer" program involving due diligence to confirm
the identity of persons seeking to open accounts and to deny accounts to those persons unable to demonstrate their identities; (iii)
the filing of currency transaction reports for deposits and withdrawals of large amounts of cash; (iv) additional precautions for
accounts sought and managed for non-U.S. persons; and (v) verification and certification of money laundering risk with respect
to private banking and foreign correspondent banking relationships. For many of these tasks a bank must keep records to be made
available to its primary federal regulator. Anti- money laundering rules and policies are developed by a bureau within the U.S.
Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, but compliance by individual institutions is overseen by
its primary federal regulator which, in the Bank's case, is the OCC.
Bank regulators routinely examine institutions for compliance with these obligations, and they must consider an
institution’s compliance with such obligations in connection with the regulatory review of applications, including applications
for banking mergers and acquisitions. Compliance with these requirements has been a special focus of the Federal Reserve and
the other Federal banking agencies in recent years. Any non-compliance is likely to result in an enforcement action, often with
substantial monetary penalties and reputational damage. A savings association or bank that is required to strengthen its compliance
program often must put on hold any initiatives that require banking agency approval.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) is responsible for helping to ensure
that U.S. entities do not engage in transactions with certain prohibited parties, as defined by various Executive Orders and Acts
of Congress. OFAC publishes lists of persons, organizations and countries suspected of aiding, harboring or engaging in terrorist
acts, known as Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons. If the Company or the Bank finds a name on any transaction,
account or wire transfer that is on an OFAC list, the Company or the Bank must freeze or block such account or transaction, file
a suspicious activity report and notify the appropriate authorities.
Consumer Laws and Regulations
Banking organizations are subject to numerous Federal laws and regulations intended to protect consumers. These laws
include, among others:
•
Truth in Lending Act;
14
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Truth in Savings Act;
Electronic Funds Transfer Act;
Expedited Funds Availability Act;
Equal Credit Opportunity Act;
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act;
Fair Housing Act;
Fair Credit Reporting Act;
Fair Debt Collection Act;
The GLB Act;
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act;
Right to Financial Privacy Act;
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act;
Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and section 1031 of the Dodd-Frank Act protecting against
unfair, deceptive or abusive acts and practices; and
state usury laws.
Many states and local jurisdictions have consumer protection laws analogous to, and in addition to, those listed above.
These federal, state and local laws regulate the manner in which financial institutions deal with customers when taking deposits,
making loans, or conducting other types of transactions. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could give rise to
regulatory sanctions, customer rescission rights, action by state and local attorneys general and civil or criminal liability. The
creation of the CFPB by the Dodd-Frank Act has led to enhanced enforcement of consumer financial protection laws.
Privacy and Cybersecurity
Several Federal statutes and regulations require insured depository institutions to take several steps to protect nonpublic
consumer financial information. The Bank has prepared a privacy policy, which it must disclose to consumers annually. In some
cases, the Bank must obtain a consumer's consent before sharing information with an unaffiliated third party, and the Bank must
allow a consumer to opt out of the Bank's sharing of information with its affiliates for marketing and certain other purposes.
Additional conditions come into play in the Bank's information exchanges with credit reporting agencies. The Bank's privacy
practices and the effectiveness of its systems to protect consumer privacy are one of the subjects covered in the OCC's periodic
compliance examinations.
The Federal banking agencies pay close attention to the cybersecurity practices of savings associations, banks, and their
holding companies and affiliates. The interagency council of the agencies, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
(“FFIEC”), has issued several policy statements and other guidance for banks as new cybersecurity threats arise. FFIEC has recently
focused on such matters as compromised customer credentials and business continuity planning. Examinations by the banking
agencies now include review of an institution’s information technology and its ability to thwart cyber attacks.
The Community Reinvestment Act
The Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) and related regulations are intended to encourage insured depository
institutions to help meet the credit needs of low- to moderate-income communities and individuals within their institutions’
assessment areas. The CRA does not impose specific lending requirements, and it does not contemplate that an insured depository
institution would take any action inconsistent with safety and soundness.
15
The Federal banking agencies evaluate the performance of each of their regulated institutions periodically to determine
whether an institution’s performance is “Outstanding,” “Satisfactory,” “Needs to Improve” or “Substantial Noncompliance.” Each
evaluation is made public, together with the underlying report. Outstanding or Satisfactory ratings often are a condition to qualify
for certain regulatory benefits.
The CRA requires the federal bank regulators to take into account an insured depository institution’s record in meeting
the convenience and needs of the communities that the institution serves when considering an application by a bank to establish
or relocate a branch or to enter into certain mergers or acquisitions. The Federal Reserve is required to consider the CRA records
of a bank holding company’s subsidiary bank (or banks) when considering an application by the bank holding company to acquire
a banking organization or to merge with another bank holding company. When we or the Bank apply for regulatory approval to
engage in certain transactions, the regulators will consider the CRA performance of the target institutions and our depository
institution subsidiaries. An evaluation of “Needs to Improve” or “Substantial Noncompliance” may block or impede regulatory
approvals of our applications. The Bank received an overall CRA rating of “Satisfactory” as an intermediate small bank on its
most recent CRA examination as of January 23, 2017.
Changes in Laws, Regulations or Policies
Federal, state and local legislators and regulators regularly introduce measures or take actions that would modify the
regulatory requirements applicable to banks, their holding companies and other financial institutions. Changes in laws, regulations
or regulatory policies could adversely affect the operating environment for us in substantial and unpredictable ways, increase our
cost of doing business, impose new restrictions on the way in which the Company conducts its operations or add significant
operational constraints that might impair the Company’s profitability. Whether new legislation will be enacted and, if enacted, the
effect that it, or any implementing regulations, would have on the Company and its subsidiaries’ business, financial condition or
results of operations cannot be predicted. The majority of these changes will be implemented over time by various regulatory
agencies. The full effect that these changes will have on us and our subsidiaries remains uncertain at this time and may have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.
Effect on Economic Environment
The policies of regulatory authorities, including the monetary policy of the Federal Reserve, have a significant effect on
the operating results of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries. Among the means available to the Federal Reserve to affect
the money supply are open market operations in U.S. government securities, changes in the discount rate on borrowings and
changes in reserve requirements with respect to deposits. These means are used in varying combinations to influence overall
growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits, and their use may affect interest rates charged on loans or paid
for deposits. Federal Reserve monetary policies have materially affected the operating results of commercial banks in the past and
are expected to continue to do so in the future. The Company cannot predict the nature of future monetary policies and the effect
of such policies on its business and earnings.
16
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before you decide to invest in our common stock, you should
carefully consider the risks described below, together with all other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10 K,
including the disclosures in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.” We believe the risks described below are the risks that are material to us as of the date of this Annual Report on Form
10 K. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects
could be materially and adversely affected. In that case, you could experience a partial or complete loss of your investment.
Risks Related to Veritex’s Business
Veritex’s business concentration in Texas, and specifically the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and the Houston metropolitan
area, imposes risks and may magnify the consequences of any regional or local economic downturn affecting the Dallas-Fort
Worth metroplex and the Houston metropolitan area, including any downturn in the real estate sector.
Veritex primarily conducts operations in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and the Houston metropolitan area. As of
December 31, 2018, the substantial majority of the loans in Veritex’s loan portfolio were made to borrowers who live and/or
conduct business in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and the Houston metropolitan area, and the substantial majority of secured
loans were secured by collateral located in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and the Houston metropolitan area. Accordingly,
Veritex is significantly exposed to risks associated with a lack of geographic diversification. The economic conditions in the Dallas-
Fort Worth metroplex and the Houston metropolitan area are highly dependent on the real estate sector as well as the technology,
financial services, insurance, transportation, manufacturing and energy sectors. Any downturn or adverse development in these
sectors, particularly the real estate sector, or a decline in the value of single-family homes in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and
the Houston metropolitan area, could have a material adverse impact on Veritex’s business, financial condition, results of operations,
and future prospects. Any adverse economic developments, among other things, could negatively affect the volume of loan
originations, increase the level of nonperforming assets, increase the rate of foreclosure losses on loans and reduce the value of
loans in Veritex’s portfolio. Volatility in oil prices may have an impact on the economic conditions in the markets in which we
operate. Any regional or local economic downturn that affects (1) existing or prospective borrowers, (2) the Dallas-Fort Worth
metroplex or Houston metropolitan area or (3) property values in its market areas, may affect Veritex and its profitability more
significantly and more adversely than its competitors whose operations are less geographically focused.
Uncertain market conditions and economic trends could adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Veritex operates in an uncertain economic environment, including generally uncertain conditions nationally and locally
in its industry and market. Financial institutions continue to be affected by volatility in the real estate market in some parts of the
country and uncertain regulatory and interest rate conditions. Veritex retains direct exposure to the residential and commercial
real estate market in Texas, particularly in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and Houston metropolitan area, and is affected by
these events.
Veritex’s ability to assess the creditworthiness of customers and to estimate the losses inherent in its loan portfolio is
made more complex by uncertain market and economic conditions. While certain economic conditions in the U.S. have shown
signs of improvement in recent years, economic growth has been slow and uneven as consumers continue to recover from previously
high unemployment rates, lower housing values, concerns about the level of U.S. government debt and fiscal actions that may be
taken to address this, as well as economic and political conditions in the global markets. Unfavorable economic trends, sustained
high unemployment, and declines in real estate values can cause a reduction in the availability of commercial credit and can
negatively impact the credit performance of commercial and consumer loans, resulting in increased write-downs. These negative
trends can cause economic pressure on consumers and businesses and diminish confidence in the financial markets, which may
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to access capital. A worsening of these conditions,
such as a recession or economic slowdown, would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market conditions on us
and others in the financial services industry.
Veritex’s risk management practices, such as monitoring the concentration of its loans within specific industries and its
credit approval practices, may not adequately reduce credit risk, and its credit administration personnel, policies and procedures
may not adequately adapt to changes in economic or any other conditions affecting customers and the quality of the loan portfolio.
A national economic recession or deterioration of conditions in Veritex’s market could drive losses beyond that which is provided
for in its allowance for loan losses and result in one or more of the following consequences:
17
•
•
•
•
increases in loan delinquencies;
increases in nonperforming assets and foreclosures;
decreases in demand for Veritex’s products and services, which could adversely affect its liquidity position; and
decreases in the value of the collateral securing Veritex’s loans, especially real estate, which could reduce
customers’ borrowing power and repayment ability
Declines in real estate values, volume of home sales and financial stress on borrowers as a result of the uncertain economic
environment, including job losses, could have an adverse effect on Veritex’s borrowers and/or their customers, which could
adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Interest rate shifts could reduce net interest income and otherwise negatively impact Veritex’s financial condition and results
of operations.
The majority of Veritex’s banking assets are monetary in nature and subject to risk from changes in interest rates. Like
most financial institutions, Veritex’s earnings and cash flows depend to a great extent upon the level of net interest income, or the
difference between the interest income earned on loans, investments and other interest-earning assets, and the interest paid on
interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Changes in interest rates can increase or decrease net interest income
because different types of assets and liabilities may react differently, and at different times, to market interest rate changes. When
interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice more quickly or to a greater degree than interest-earning assets in a period, an increase
in interest rates could reduce net interest income. Similarly, when interest-earning assets mature or reprice more quickly or to a
greater degree than interest-bearing liabilities, falling interest rates could reduce net interest income. Veritex’s interest sensitivity
profile was asset sensitive as of December 31, 2018, meaning that it estimates net interest income would increase more from rising
interest rates than from falling interest rates.
An increase in interest rates may also, among other things, reduce the demand for loans and Veritex’s ability to originate
loans and decrease loan repayment rates. A decrease in the general level of interest rates may affect Veritex through, among other
things, increased prepayments on its loan portfolio and increased competition for deposits. Accordingly, changes in the level of
market interest rates affect Veritex’s net yield on interest-earning assets, loan origination volume, loan portfolio and overall results.
Although Veritex’s asset-liability management strategy is designed to control and mitigate exposure to the risks related to changes
in market interest rates, those rates are affected by many factors outside of Veritex’s control, including governmental monetary
policies, inflation, deflation, recession, changes in unemployment, the money supply, international disorder and instability in
domestic and foreign financial markets.
Additionally, interest rate increases often result in larger payment requirements for our borrowers, which increases the
potential for default and could result in a decrease in the demand for loans. At the same time, the marketability of the property
securing a loan may be adversely affected by any reduced demand resulting from higher interest rates. In a declining interest rate
environment, there may be an increase in prepayments on loans as borrowers refinance their loans at lower rates. In addition, in
a low interest rate environment, loan customers often pursue long-term fixed rate credits, which could adversely affect our earnings
and net interest margin if rates increase. Changes in interest rates also can affect the value of loans, securities and other assets. An
increase in interest rates that adversely affects the ability of borrowers to pay the principal or interest on loans may lead to an
increase in nonperforming assets and a reduction of income recognized, which could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations and cash flows. Further, when Veritex places a loan on nonaccrual status, Veritex reverses any accrued but unpaid
interest receivable, which decreases interest income. At the same time, Veritex continues to incur a cost to fund the loan, which
is reflected as interest expense on deposits and borrowings, without any interest income to offset the associated funding expense.
We would incur a higher cost of funds to retain these deposits in a rising interest rate environment. Our net interest income could
be adversely affected if the rates we pay on deposits and borrowings increase more rapidly than the rates we earn on loans and
other investments. Thus, an increase in the amount of nonperforming assets would have an adverse impact on Veritex’s net interest
income.
Significant increases of nonperforming assets from the current level, or greater than anticipated costs to resolve these credits,
will have an adverse effect on Veritex’s earnings.
Veritex’s nonperforming assets, which consist of non-accrual loans, assets acquired through foreclosure and troubled
debt restructurings (“TDRs”) adversely affect our net income in various ways. Veritex does not record interest income on nonaccrual
loans and assets acquired through foreclosure. Veritex must establish an allowance for loan losses which reserves for losses
inherent in the loan portfolio that are both probable and reasonably estimable. From time to time, Veritex also writes down the
value of properties in its portfolio of assets acquired through foreclosure to reflect changing market values. Additionally, there are
legal fees associated with the resolution of problem assets as well as carrying costs such as taxes, insurance and maintenance
related to assets acquired through foreclosure. The resolution of nonperforming assets requires the active involvement of
18
management, which can distract management from daily operations and other income producing activities. Finally, if Veritex’s
estimate of the allowance for loan losses is inadequate, Veritex will have to increase the allowance for loan losses accordingly,
which will have an adverse effect on Veritex’s earnings. Significant increases in the level of Veritex’s nonperforming assets from
the current level, or greater than anticipated costs to resolve these credits, will have an adverse effect on Veritex’s earnings.
The small to medium-sized businesses that Veritex lends to may have fewer resources to weather adverse business developments,
which may impair a borrower’s ability to repay a loan, and such impairment could adversely affect Veritex’s results of operations
and financial condition.
Veritex focuses its business development and marketing strategy primarily on small to medium-sized businesses. Small
to medium-sized businesses frequently have smaller market shares than their competition, may be more vulnerable to economic
downturns, often need substantial additional capital to expand or compete and may experience substantial volatility in operating
results, any of which characteristics may impair a borrower’s ability to repay a loan. In addition, the success of a small or medium-
sized business often depends on the management skills, talents and efforts of a small group of people, and the death, disability or
resignation of one or more of these people could have a material adverse impact on the business and its ability to repay its loans.
If general economic conditions negatively impact the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex, Houston metropolitan area or Texas generally,
and small to medium-sized businesses are adversely affected or Veritex’s borrowers are otherwise affected by adverse business
developments, Veritex’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Veritex’s allowance for loan losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb potential losses in its loan portfolio, which could
adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Veritex establishes an allowance for loan losses and maintains it at a level considered adequate by management to absorb
probable loan losses based on its analysis of the loan portfolio and market environment. The allowance for loan losses represents
Veritex’s estimate of probable losses in the portfolio at each balance sheet date and is based upon relevant information available
to Veritex. Veritex’s allowance for loan losses consists of a general component based upon probable but unidentified losses inherent
in the portfolio and a specific component based on individual loans that are considered impaired. The general component is based
on various factors including historical loss experience, historical loss experience for peer banks, growth trends, loan concentrations,
migration trends between internal loan risk ratings, current economic conditions and other qualitative factors. The specific
component of the allowance for loan losses is calculated based on a review of individual loans considered impaired. The analysis
of impaired losses may be based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the effective loan rate, an
observable market price or the fair value of the underlying collateral on collateral dependent loans. In determining the collectability
of certain loans, management also considers the fair value of any underlying collateral. The amount ultimately realized may differ
from the carrying value of these assets because of economic, operating or other conditions beyond Veritex’s control, and any such
differences may be material.
As of December 31, 2018, Veritex’s allowance for loan losses was 0.75% of its total loans. Loans acquired are initially
recorded at fair value, which includes an estimate of credit losses expected to be realized over the remaining lives of the loans,
and therefore no corresponding allowance for loan losses is recorded for these loans at acquisition. Additional loan losses may
occur in the future and may occur at a rate greater than Veritex has previously experienced. Veritex may be required to take
additional provisions for loan losses in the future to further supplement the allowance for loan losses, either due to management’s
decision to do so or requirements by its banking regulators. In addition, bank regulatory agencies will periodically review the
allowance for loan losses and the value attributed to non-accrual loans or to real estate acquired through foreclosure. Such regulatory
agencies may require Veritex to recognize future charge-offs. These adjustments could adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Veritex’s financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in accounting policies, standards
and interpretations.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and other bodies that establish accounting standards periodically
change the financial accounting and reporting standards governing the preparation of our financial statements. Additionally, those
bodies that establish and interpret the accounting standards (such as the FASB, SEC and banking regulators) may change prior
interpretations or positions on how these standards should be applied. Changes resulting from these new standards may result in
materially different financial results and may require that we change how we process, analyze and report financial information
and that we change financial reporting controls.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic
326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This update amends guidance on reporting credit losses for assets
19
held at amortized cost basis and available for sale debt securities. The Company anticipates a significant change in the processes
and procedures to calculate the loan losses, including changes in assumptions and estimates to consider expected credit losses
over the life of the loan versus the current accounting practice that utilizes the incurred loss model. The change in methodology
may result in material changes in the Company’s accounting for credit losses on financial instruments and create more volatility
in the Company’s level of allowance for loan losses. If the Company is required to materially increase its level of allowance for
loan losses for any reason, such increase could adversely affect its business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Veritex may be unable to implement aspects of its growth strategy, which may affect its ability to maintain historical earnings
trends.
Veritex’s business has grown rapidly, with a strategy focused on organic growth, supplemented by acquisitions. Financial
institutions that grow rapidly can experience significant difficulties as a result of rapid growth. Veritex may be unable to execute
on aspects of its growth strategy to sustain its historical rate of growth or may be unable to grow at all. More specifically, Veritex
may be unable to generate sufficient new loans and deposits within acceptable risk and expense tolerances, obtain the personnel
or funding necessary for additional growth or find suitable acquisition candidates. Various factors, such as economic conditions
and competition, may impede or prohibit the growth of Veritex’s operations, the opening of new branches and the consummation
of acquisitions. Further, Veritex may be unable to attract and retain experienced bankers, which could adversely affect its growth.
The success of Veritex’s strategy also depends on its ability to effectively manage growth, which is dependent upon a number of
factors, including the ability to adapt existing credit, operational, technology and governance infrastructure to accommodate
expanded operations. If Veritex fails to build infrastructure sufficient to support rapid growth or fails to implement one or more
aspects of its strategy, Veritex may be unable to maintain historical earnings trends, which could have an adverse effect on Veritex’s
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Veritex’s strategy of pursuing acquisitions exposes it to financial, execution and operational risks that could have a material
adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
Veritex intends to continue pursuing a strategy that includes acquisitions. An acquisition strategy involves significant
risks, including the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
finding suitable candidates for acquisition;
attracting funding to support additional growth within acceptable risk tolerances;
maintaining asset quality;
retaining customers and key personnel, including bankers;
obtaining necessary regulatory approvals, which Veritex may have difficulty obtaining or be unable to obtain;
conducting adequate due diligence and managing known and unknown risks and uncertainties;
integrating acquired businesses; and
maintaining adequate regulatory capital.
The market for acquisition targets is highly competitive, which may adversely affect Veritex’s ability to find acquisition
candidates that fit its strategy and standards. Veritex faces significant competition in pursuing acquisition targets from other banks
and financial institutions, many of which possess greater financial, human, technical and other resources than Veritex. Veritex’s
ability to compete in acquiring target institutions will depend on the financial resources available to fund acquisitions, including
the amount of cash and cash equivalents and the liquidity and market price of Veritex common stock. In addition, increased
competition may also drive up the acquisition consideration that Veritex will be required to pay in order to successfully capitalize
on attractive acquisition opportunities. To the extent that Veritex is unable to find suitable acquisition targets, an important
component of its growth strategy may not be realized.
Acquisitions of financial institutions also involve operational risks and uncertainties, such as unknown or contingent
liabilities with no available manner of recourse, exposure to unexpected problems such as asset quality, the retention of key
employees and customers and other issues that could negatively affect Veritex’s business. Veritex may not be able to complete
future acquisitions or, if completed, may not be able to successfully integrate the operations, technology platforms, management,
products and services of the entities acquired or realize a reduction of redundancies. The integration process may also require
significant time and attention from Veritex’s management that would otherwise be directed toward servicing existing business and
developing new business. Failure to successfully integrate the entities Veritex acquires into its existing operations in a timely or
effective manner may increase its operating costs significantly and adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition and
results of operations. Further, acquisitions typically involve the payment of a premium over book and market values and, therefore,
some dilution of Veritex’s tangible book value and net income per common share may occur in connection with any future
acquisition. In addition, the carrying amount of any goodwill that is currently maintained or that may be acquired may be subject
to impairment in future periods.
20
Combining Veritex and Green may be more difficult, costly or time consuming than expected and the anticipated benefits and
cost savings of the acquisition may not be realized.
The success of our recent acquisition of Green will depend on, among other things, our ability to combine the businesses
of Veritex and Green. It is possible that process of integrating Green’s business into Veritex’s could result in the loss of key
employees, disruption to ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect
our ability to maintain relationships with clients, customers, depositors and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits and
cost savings of the acquisition. The loss of key employees could have an adverse effect on our financial results and the value of
our common stock. If we experience difficulties with the integration process, the anticipated benefits of the acquisition may not
be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. In addition, the actual cost savings of the acquisition could
be less than anticipated.
Veritex expects to incur substantial expenses related to the Green acquisition.
We expect to incur substantial expenses in connection with combining the business, operations, networks, systems,
technologies, policies and procedures of Veritex and Green. Although we have assumed that a certain level of transaction and
combination expenses would be incurred, there are a number of factors and assumptions beyond our control that could affect the
total amount or the timing of our combination expenses. Many of the expenses that will be incurred, by their nature, are difficult
to estimate accurately at the present time.Due to these factors, the expenses associated with the acquisition could exceed the savings
that we expect to achieve from the elimination of duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale and cost savings
related to the combination of the businesses following the consummation of the acquisition. As a result of these expenses, Veritex
expects to take charges against their earnings before and after the completion of the acquisition.
Veritex’s ability to retain bankers and recruit additional successful bankers is critical to the success of its business strategy,
and any failure to do so could adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
Veritex’s ability to retain and grow loans, deposits and fee income depends upon the business generation capabilities,
reputation and relationship management skills of its bankers. If Veritex were to lose the services of any of its bankers, including
successful bankers employed by banks that Veritex may acquire, to a new or existing competitor or otherwise, Veritex may not be
able to retain valuable relationships and some of its customers could choose to use the services of a competitor instead.
Veritex’s growth strategy also relies on its ability to attract and retain additional profitable bankers. Veritex may face
difficulties in recruiting and retaining bankers of the desired caliber, including as a result of competition from other financial
institutions. In particular, many of Veritex’s competitors are significantly larger with greater financial resources, and may be able
to offer more attractive compensation packages and broader career opportunities. Additionally, Veritex may incur significant
expenses and expend significant time and resources on training, integration and business development before it is able to determine
whether a new banker will be profitable or effective. If Veritex is unable to attract and retain successful bankers, or if its bankers
fail to meet expectations in terms of customer relationships and profitability, Veritex may be unable to execute its business strategy
and its business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects may be adversely affected.
Loss of any of Veritex’s executive officers or other key employees could impair relationships with its customers and adversely
affect its business.
Veritex’s success depends on the continued service and skills of its executive management team. Veritex’s goals, strategies
and marketing efforts are closely tied to the banking philosophy and strengths of its executive management team. Veritex’s success
is also dependent in part on the continued service of its market presidents and relationship managers. The loss of any of these key
personnel could adversely affect Veritex’s business because of their skills, years of industry experience, relationships with customers
and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. Veritex cannot guarantee that these executive officers or
key employees will continue to be employed with them in the future.
The relatively unseasoned nature of a significant portion of Veritex’s loan portfolio may expose it to increased credit risks.
The business of lending is inherently risky, including risks that the principal of or interest on any loan will not be repaid
timely or at all or that the value of any collateral supporting the loan will be insufficient to cover Veritex’s outstanding exposure.
Veritex’s loan portfolio has grown to $2.5 billion as of December 31, 2018, from $100.9 million as of December 31, 2010. This
growth is related to both organic growth and loans acquired in connection with business acquisitions. The organic portion of this
increase is due to increased loan production in the Texas markets in which we operate. It is difficult to assess the future performance
of acquired or recently originated loans because Veritex’s relatively limited experience with such loans does not provide it with a
significant payment history from which to judge future collectability. These loans may experience higher delinquency or charge-
21
off levels than Veritex’s historical loan portfolio experience, which could adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition
and results of operations.
A large portion of Veritex’s loan portfolio consists of commercial loans secured by receivables, promissory notes, inventory,
equipment or other commercial collateral, the deterioration in value of which could increase the potential for future losses.
As of December 31, 2018, $760.8 million, or 29.8%, of Veritex’s total loans, consisted of commercial loans to businesses.
In general, these loans are collateralized by general business assets including, among other things, accounts receivable, promissory
notes, inventory and equipment, and most are backed by a personal guaranty of the borrower or principal. These commercial loans
are typically larger in amount than loans to individuals and, therefore, have the potential for larger losses on a single loan basis.
Additionally, the repayment of commercial loans is subject to the ongoing business operations of the borrower. The collateral
securing such loans generally includes moveable property such as equipment and inventory, which may decline in value more
rapidly than Veritex anticipates, thereby exposing it to increased credit risk. A significant portion of Veritex’s commercial loans
are secured by promissory notes that evidence loans made by Veritex to borrowers that in turn make loans to others that are secured
by real estate. Accordingly, negative changes in the economy affecting real estate values and liquidity could impair the value of
the collateral securing these loans. Significant adverse changes in the economy or local market conditions in which Veritex’s
commercial lending customers operate could cause rapid declines in loan collectability and the values associated with general
business assets resulting in inadequate collateral coverage that may expose Veritex to credit losses and could adversely affect its
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Veritex’s commercial real estate and construction and land loan portfolios expose it to credit risks that could be greater than
the risks related to other types of loans.
As of December 31, 2018, $1.1 billion, or 43.2% of total loans, consisted of commercial real estate loans (including
owner occupied commercial real estate loans) and $324.9 million, or 12.7% of total loans, consisted of construction and land
loans. These loans typically involve repayment dependent upon income generated, or expected to be generated, by the property
securing the loan in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt service. The availability of such income for repayment
may be adversely affected by changes in the economy or local market conditions. These loans expose a lender to greater credit
risk than loans secured by other types of collateral because the collateral securing these loans is typically more difficult to liquidate
due to the fluctuation of real estate values. Additionally, non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans generally involve
relatively large balances to single borrowers or related groups of borrowers. Unexpected deterioration in the credit quality of
Veritex’s non-owner occupied commercial real estate loan portfolio could require it to increase the allowance for loan losses,
which would reduce profitability and could have a material adverse effect on Veritex’s business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Construction and land loans also involve risks attributable to the fact that loan funds are secured by a project under
construction, and the project is of uncertain value prior to its completion. It can be difficult to accurately evaluate the total funds
required to complete a project, and construction lending often involves the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment
dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project rather than the ability of a borrower or guarantor to repay the loan. If
Veritex is forced to foreclose on a project prior to completion, it may be unable to recover the entire unpaid portion of the loan.
In addition, Veritex may be required to fund additional amounts to complete a project and may have to hold the property for an
indeterminate period of time, any of which could adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because a significant portion of its loan portfolio consists of real estate loans, negative changes in the economy affecting real
estate values and liquidity could impair the value of collateral securing Veritex’s real estate loans and result in loan and other
losses.
As of December 31, 2018, $1.8 billion, or 70.0% of total loans, consisted of loans with real estate as a primary or secondary
component of collateral. As a result, adverse developments affecting real estate values in the Texas markets in which we operate
could increase the credit risk associated with Veritex’s real estate loan portfolio. Real estate values in many Texas markets have
experienced periods of fluctuation over the last five years, and the market value of real estate can fluctuate significantly in a short
period of time. Adverse changes affecting real estate values and the liquidity of real estate in one or more of Veritex’s markets
could increase the credit risk associated with Veritex’s loan portfolio, and could result in losses that adversely affect credit quality,
financial condition and results of operations. Negative changes in the economy affecting real estate values and liquidity in Veritex’s
market areas could significantly impair the value of property pledged as collateral on loans and affect its ability to sell the collateral
upon foreclosure without a loss or additional losses. Collateral may need to be sold for less than the outstanding balance of the
loan, which could result in losses on such loans. Such declines and losses could have a material adverse impact on Veritex’s
business, results of operations and growth prospects. If real estate values decline, it is also more likely that Veritex would be
22
required to increase the allowance for loan losses, which could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Veritex may be subject to environmental liabilities in connection with the foreclosure on real estate assets securing its loan
portfolio.
Hazardous or toxic substances or other environmental hazards may be located on the properties that secure Veritex’s
loans. If Veritex acquires such properties as a result of foreclosure or otherwise, it could become subject to various environmental
liabilities. For example, Veritex could be held liable for the cost of cleaning up or otherwise addressing contamination at or from
these properties. Veritex could also be held liable to a governmental entity or third party for property damage, personal injury or
other claims relating to any environmental contamination at or from these properties. In addition, Veritex may own and operate
certain properties that may be subject to similar environmental liability risks during any given fiscal year. At December 31, 2018,
Veritex did not own any foreclosed or real estate assets. Although Veritex has policies and procedures that are designed to mitigate
certain environmental risks, it may not detect all environmental hazards associated with these properties. If Veritex were to become
subject to significant environmental liabilities, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Veritex has a concentration of loans outstanding to a limited number of borrowers, which may increase its risk of loss.
Veritex has extended significant amounts of credit to a limited number of borrowers, and as of December 31, 2018, the
aggregate amount of loans to its 10 and 25 largest borrowers (including related entities) amounted to $363.1 million, or 14.2% of
total loans, and $650.7 million, or 25.5% of total loans, respectively. As of such date, none of these loans were nonperforming
loans. Concentration of a significant amount of credit extended to a limited number of borrowers increases the risk in Veritex’s
loan portfolio. If one or more of these borrowers is unable to make payments of interest and principal in respect of such loans, the
potential loss to Veritex is more likely to have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
A lack of liquidity could impair Veritex’s ability to fund operations and adversely affect its operations and jeopardize its business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Liquidity is essential to Veritex’s business. Veritex relies on its ability to generate deposits and effectively manage the
repayment and maturity schedules of loans and investment securities, respectively, to ensure that it has adequate liquidity to fund
operations. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of Veritex’s investment securities, the sale of loans
and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on its liquidity.
Veritex’s most important source of funds is core deposits. Core deposit balances can decrease when customers perceive
alternative investments as providing a better risk/return tradeoff. If customers move money out of bank deposits and into other
investments, such as money market funds, Veritex would lose a relatively low-cost source of funds, increasing funding costs and
reducing net interest income and net income.
Other primary sources of funds consist of cash flows from operations, maturities and sales of investment securities, and
proceeds from the issuance and sale of Veritex equity and debt securities to investors. Additional liquidity is provided by the ability
to borrow from Veritex’s brokered deposit network, which includes the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas (the “FHLB”) and the
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (the “FRB”). Veritex also may borrow funds from third-party lenders, such as other financial
institutions. Access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize its activities, or on acceptable terms, could be
impaired by factors that affect Veritex directly or the financial services industry or economy in general, such as disruptions in the
financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry. Veritex’s access to
funding sources could also be affected by a decrease in the level of business activity as a result of a downturn in the Dallas-Fort
Worth metroplex or by one or more adverse regulatory actions against Veritex.
Any decline in available funding could adversely impact Veritex’s ability to originate loans, invest in securities, meet its
expenses or fulfill obligations such as repaying borrowings or meeting deposit withdrawal demands, any of which could have a
material adverse impact on liquidity and could, in turn, adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition and results of
operations.
23
Veritex has a limited operating history and, accordingly, investors will have little basis on which to evaluate its ability to achieve
its business objectives.
Veritex was formed as a bank holding company in 2009 and commenced banking operations in 2010. Accordingly, Veritex
has a limited operating history upon which to evaluate its business and future prospects. As a result, it is difficult, if not impossible,
to predict future operating results and to assess the likelihood of the success of Veritex’s business. As a relatively young financial
institution, Veritex Bank is also subject to risks and levels of risk that are often greater than those encountered by financial
institutions with longer established operations and relationships. New financial institutions often require significant capital from
sources other than operations. Since Veritex is a relatively new financial institution, its management team and employees will
shoulder the burdens of the business operations and a workload associated with business growth and capitalization that is
disproportionately greater than a more mature, established financial institution.
Veritex may need to raise additional capital in the future, and if it fails to maintain sufficient capital, whether due to losses,
an inability to raise additional capital or otherwise, Veritex’s financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, as well as
the ability to maintain regulatory compliance, could be adversely affected.
Veritex faces significant capital and other regulatory requirements as a financial institution. Veritex may need to raise
additional capital in the future to provide sufficient capital resources and liquidity to meet its commitments and business needs,
which could include the possibility of financing acquisitions. In addition, Veritex, on a consolidated basis, and Veritex Bank, on
a standalone basis, must meet certain regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity. Importantly, regulatory
capital requirements could increase from current levels, which could require Veritex to raise additional capital or reduce its
operations. Veritex’s ability to raise additional capital depends on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a
number of other factors, including investor perceptions regarding the banking industry, market conditions and governmental
activities, and on Veritex’s financial condition and performance. Accordingly, Veritex may be unable to raise additional capital if
needed or on acceptable terms. If Veritex fails to maintain capital to meet regulatory requirements, its liquidity, business, financial
condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Veritex could recognize losses on investment securities held in its securities portfolio, particularly if interest rates increase or
economic and market conditions deteriorate.
While Veritex attempts to invest a significant percentage of its assets in loans (its loan to deposit ratio was 97.4% as of
December 31, 2018), it also invests a percentage of its total assets in investment securities (8.2% as of December 31, 2018) with
the primary objectives of providing a source of liquidity, providing an appropriate return on funds invested, managing interest rate
risk, meeting pledging requirements and meeting regulatory capital requirements. As of December 31, 2018, the fair value of
Veritex’s securities portfolio was $262.7 million, which included a net unrealized loss of $3.7 million. Factors beyond Veritex’s
control can significantly influence the fair value of securities in its portfolio and can cause potential adverse changes to the fair
value of these securities. For example, fixed-rate securities are generally subject to decreases in market value when interest rates
rise. Additional factors include, but are not limited to, rating agency downgrades of the securities, defaults by the issuer or individual
borrowers with respect to the underlying securities, and continued instability in the credit markets. Any of the foregoing factors
could cause other-than-temporary impairment in future periods and result in realized losses. The process for determining whether
impairment is other-than-temporary usually requires difficult, subjective judgments about the future financial performance of the
issuer and any collateral underlying the security in order to assess the probability of receiving all contractual principal and interest
payments on the security. Because of changing economic and market conditions affecting interest rates, the financial condition of
issuers of the securities and the performance of the underlying collateral, Veritex may recognize realized and/or unrealized losses
in future periods, which could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
24
Veritex faces strong competition from financial services companies and other companies that offer banking services, which
could adversely affect its business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Veritex conducts its operations exclusively in Texas and particularly in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and Houston
metropolitan area. Many of Veritex’s competitors offer the same, or a wider variety of, banking services within the same market
area. These competitors include banks with nationwide operations, regional banks and other community banks. Veritex also faces
competition from many other types of financial institutions, including savings banks, credit unions, finance companies, mutual
funds, insurance companies, brokerage and investment banking firms, asset-based non-bank lenders and certain other non-financial
entities, such as retail stores which may maintain their own credit programs and certain governmental organizations which may
offer more favorable financing or deposit terms than Veritex can. In addition, a number of out-of-state financial intermediaries
have opened production offices, or otherwise solicit deposits, in its market area. Increased competition in Veritex’s market may
result in reduced loans and deposits, as well as reduced net interest margin, fee income and profitability. Ultimately, Veritex may
not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors. If it is unable to attract and retain banking customers,
Veritex may be unable to continue to grow loan and deposit portfolios, and its business, financial condition and results of operations
could be adversely affected.
Veritex’s ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including, among other things:
•
•
•
•
•
•
its ability to develop, maintain and build long term customer relationships based on top quality service, high ethical
standards and safe, sound assets;
the scope, relevance and pricing of products and services offered to meet customer needs and demands;
the rate at which Veritex introduces new products and services relative to its competitors;
customer satisfaction with Veritex’s level of service;
the ability to expand Veritex’s market position; and
industry and general economic trends.
Failure to perform in any of these areas could significantly weaken Veritex’s competitive position, which could adversely
affect its growth and profitability, which, in turn, could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.
Negative public opinion regarding Veritex or Veritex’s failure to maintain its reputation in the community could adversely
affect its business and prevent Veritex from continuing to grow its business.
As a community bank, Veritex’s reputation within the community it serves is critical to its success. Veritex strives to
enhance its reputation by recruiting, hiring and retaining employees who share its core values of being an integral part of the
communities Veritex serves and delivering superior service to its customers. If Veritex’s reputation is negatively affected by the
actions of its employees or otherwise, Veritex may be less successful in attracting new customers, and its business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. Further, negative public opinion can
expose Veritex to litigation and regulatory action as it seeks to implement its growth strategy.
We may not be able to report our financial results accurately and timely as a publicly listed company if we fail to maintain an
effective system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
As a publicly traded company, we are required to file periodic reports containing our consolidated financial statements
with the SEC within a specified time following the completion of quarterly and annual periods. Maintaining effective disclosure
controls and procedures is necessary to identify information we must disclose in our periodic reports and maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting is necessary to produce reliable financial statements and to prevent fraud. If we fail to
maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures or effective internal control over financial reporting, we may experience
difficulty in satisfying our SEC reporting obligations. Any failure by us to file our periodic reports with the SEC in a timely manner
could harm our reputation and cause investors and potential investors to lose confidence in us and reduce the market price of our
common stock, and could result in a suspension or delisting of our common stock.
25
We must also comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), which requires
that we perform an annual evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. During the course of our
evaluation and testing, we may identify deficiencies, including material weaknesses, which would have to be remediated to satisfy
SEC rules for attesting to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is defined by the
standards issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal
control over financial reporting that results in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. If a material weakness is determined to exist, we must disclose this
deficiency in periodic reports we file with the SEC. The existence of a material weakness would preclude management from
concluding that our internal control over financial reporting is effective and would also preclude our independent auditors from
attesting to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, disclosures of this type in our SEC reports
could cause investors to lose confidence in our financial reporting and may negatively affect the market price of our common
stock.
More generally, if we are unable to meet the demands that have been placed upon us as a public company, including the
requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results in future periods, or report
them within the timeframes required by law or stock exchange regulations. Failure to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could
also potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities. Under such circumstances,
we may be unable to implement the necessary internal controls in a timely manner, or at all, and future material weaknesses may
exist or may be discovered. If we fail to implement the necessary improvements, or if material weaknesses or other deficiencies
occur, our ability to accurately and timely report our financial position could be impaired, which could result in late filings of our
annual and quarterly reports with the SEC, restatements of our consolidated financial statements, a decline in our stock price,
suspension or delisting of our common stock, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or
financial condition. Even if we are able to report our financial statements accurately and in a timely manner, any failure in our
efforts to implement the improvements or disclosure of material weaknesses in our future filings with the SEC could cause our
reputation to be harmed and our stock price to decline significantly.
Veritex is subject to certain operational risks, including, but not limited to, customer or employee fraud and data processing
system failures and errors.
Employee errors and employee or customer misconduct could subject Veritex to financial losses or regulatory sanctions
and seriously harm its reputation. Misconduct by Veritex’s employees could include hiding unauthorized activities, improper or
unauthorized activities on behalf of customers or improper use of confidential information. It is not always possible to prevent
employee errors or misconduct, and the precautions Veritex takes to prevent and detect these activities may not be effective in all
cases. Employee errors could also subject Veritex to financial claims for negligence.
Veritex maintains a system of internal controls to mitigate against operational risks, including data processing system
failures and errors and customer or employee fraud, as well as insurance coverage designed to protect it from material losses
associated with these risks, including losses resulting from any associated business interruption. If these internal controls fail to
prevent or detect an occurrence, or if any resulting loss is not insured or exceeds applicable insurance limits, it could adversely
affect Veritex’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, Veritex relies heavily upon information supplied by third parties, including the information contained in
credit applications, property appraisals, title information, equipment pricing and valuation and employment and income
documentation, in deciding which loans to originate, as well as the terms of those loans. If any of the information upon which
Veritex relies is misrepresented, either fraudulently or inadvertently, and the misrepresentation is not detected prior to loan funding,
the value of the loan may be significantly lower than expected, or Veritex may fund a loan that it would not have funded or on
terms it would not have extended. Whether a misrepresentation is made by the applicant or another third party, Veritex will generally
bear the risk of loss associated with the misrepresentation. A loan subject to a material misrepresentation is typically unsellable
or subject to repurchase if it is sold prior to detection of the misrepresentation. The sources of the misrepresentations are often
difficult to locate, and recovery of any of the resulting monetary losses Veritex may suffer could be difficult.
26
Veritex has a continuing need for technological change and may not have the resources to effectively implement new technology,
or may experience operational challenges when implementing new technology.
The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-
driven products and services. In addition to better serving customers, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and
enables financial institutions to reduce costs. Veritex’s future success will depend, at least in part, upon its ability to address the
needs of customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience as
well as to create additional efficiencies in operations as it continues to grow and expand the products and services offered. Veritex
may experience operational challenges as it implements these new technology enhancements or products, which could result in
an inability to fully realize the anticipated benefits from such new technology or significant costs to remedy any such challenges
in a timely manner.
Many of Veritex’s larger competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. As a
result, they may be able to offer additional or superior products compared to those that Veritex will be able to provide, which
would put it at a competitive disadvantage. Accordingly, Veritex may lose customers seeking new technology-driven products and
services to the extent it is unable to provide such products and services.
Veritex’s operations could be interrupted if third-party service providers experience difficulty, terminate their services or fail
to comply with banking regulations.
Veritex depends on a number of relationships with third-party service providers. Specifically, Veritex receives certain
services from third parties including, but not limited to, core systems processing, essential web hosting and other Internet systems,
online banking services, deposit processing and other processing services. Veritex’s operations could be interrupted if any of these
third-party service providers experience difficulties, or terminate their services, and Veritex is unable to replace them with other
service providers, particularly on a timely basis. If an interruption were to continue for a significant period of time, Veritex’s
business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected, perhaps materially. Even if Veritex is able to
replace third-party service providers, it may be at a higher cost to it, which could adversely affect its business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Unauthorized access, cyber-crime and other threats to data security may require significant resources, harm Veritex’s
reputation, and otherwise cause harm to Veritex’s business.
We necessarily collect, use and hold personal and financial information concerning individuals and businesses with which
we have a banking relationship. This information includes non-public, personally identifiable information that is protected under
applicable federal and state laws and regulations. Additionally, certain of these data processing functions are outsourced to third-
party providers. Our facilities and systems, and those of our third-party service providers, may be vulnerable to threats to data
security, security breaches, acts of vandalism and other physical security threats, computer viruses or compromises, ransomware
attacks, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors or other similar events. Any security breach involving the
misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of our confidential business, employee or customer information, whether
originating with us, our vendors or retail businesses, could severely damage our reputation, expose us to the risks of civil litigation
and liability, require the payment of regulatory fines or penalties or undertaking of costly remediation efforts with respect to third
parties affected by a security breach, disrupt our operations, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations. In addition, any damage, failure or security breach that causes breakdowns or disruptions in our general
ledger, deposit, loan or other systems could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to additional
regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
27
It is difficult or impossible to defend against every risk being posed by changing technologies, as well as criminal intent
on committing cyber-crime, and controls employed by our information technology department and our other employees and
vendors could prove inadequate. Increasing sophistication of cyber-criminals and terrorists make keeping up with new threats
difficult and could result in a breach. Cyber-security risks appear to be growing and, as a result, the cyber-resilience of banking
organizations is of increased importance to federal and state banking agencies and other regulators. New or revised laws and
regulations may significantly impact our current and planned privacy, data protection and information security-related practices,
the collection, use, sharing, retention and safeguarding of consumer and employee information, and current or planned business
activities. Compliance with current or future privacy, data protection and information security laws to which we are subject could
result in higher compliance and technology costs and could restrict our ability to provide certain products and services, which
could materially and adversely affect our profitability. In the last few years, there have been an increasing number of cyber incidents,
including several well-publicized cyber-attacks that targeted other U.S. companies, including financial services companies much
larger than us. These cyber incidents have been initiated from a variety of sources, including terrorist organizations and hostile
foreign governments. As technology advances, the ability to initiate transactions and access data has also become more widely
distributed among mobile devices, personal computers, automated teller machines, remote deposit capture sites and similar access
points, some of which are not controlled or secured by us. It is possible that we could have exposure to liability and suffer losses
as a result of a security breach or cyber-attack that occurred through no fault of Veritex. Further, the probability of a successful
cyber-attack against us or one of our third-party service providers cannot be predicted. As cyber threats continue to evolve and
increase, we may be required to spend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective and
preventative measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. Our systems and those of our third-
party vendors may also become vulnerable to damage or disruption due to circumstances beyond our or their control, such as from
catastrophic events, power anomalies or outages, natural disasters, network failures, and viruses and malware.
Consumers may decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions.
Technology and other changes are allowing consumers to complete financial transactions through alternative methods
that historically have involved banks. For example, consumers can now maintain funds that would have historically been held as
bank deposits in brokerage accounts, mutual funds or general-purpose reloadable prepaid cards. Consumers can also complete
transactions such as paying bills and transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks
as intermediaries, which may increase as consumers become more comfortable with these new technologies and offerings, could
result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The
loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost of deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
If the goodwill that Veritex has recorded or may record in connection with a business acquisition becomes impaired, it could
require charges to earnings, which would adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.
Goodwill represents the amount by which the cost of an acquisition exceeded the fair value of net assets acquired in
connection with the purchase of another financial institution. Veritex reviews goodwill for impairment at least annually, or more
frequently if a triggering event occurs which indicates that the carrying value of the asset might be impaired. Veritex may first
assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair
value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amounts, including goodwill. The Company has an unconditional option to bypass
the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the goodwill
impairment test, and the Company may resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. If the Company
determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the entity shall
perform the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. Under the first step, the estimation of fair value of the reporting
unit is compared to its carrying value including goodwill. If step one indicates a potential impairment, the second step is performed
to measure the amount of impairment, if any. If the carrying amount of the reporting goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of
that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. Any such adjustments are reflected in the results
of operations in the periods in which they become known. As of December 31, 2018, goodwill totaled $161.4 million. Although
Veritex has not recorded any impairment charges since the goodwill was initially recorded, future evaluations of existing goodwill
or goodwill acquired in the future may result in findings of impairment and related write-downs, which could adversely affect
Veritex’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
28
Risks Related to Veritex’s Industry and Regulation
The ongoing changes in regulation could adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law. This statute and the implementing regulations have imposed
significant regulatory and compliance changes on many industries, including Veritex’s. The enactment of EGRRCPA in 2018 and
other rulemaking by the agencies may impose other costs or provide regulatory relief. This evolving regulatory framework may
impact the profitability of Veritex’s business activities, require changes to certain of its business practices, require the development
of new compliance infrastructure, impose upon Veritex more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage requirements or otherwise
adversely affect its business. These changes may also require Veritex to invest significant management attention and resources to
evaluate and make any changes necessary to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements. Failure to comply with the
new requirements or with any future changes in laws or regulations could adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Veritex operates in a highly regulated environment and the laws and regulations that govern its operations, corporate
governance, executive compensation and accounting principles, or changes in them, or failure to comply with them, could
adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Veritex is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and legal requirements that govern almost all aspects of its
operations. These laws and regulations are not intended to protect Veritex shareholders. Rather, these laws and regulations are
intended to protect customers, depositors, the DIF, and the overall financial stability of the United States. These laws and regulations,
among other matters, prescribe minimum capital requirements, impose limitations on the business activities in which Veritex can
engage, limit the dividends or distributions that the Bank can pay to Veritex, restrict the ability of institutions to guarantee Veritex’s
debt, and impose certain specific accounting requirements on Veritex that may be more restrictive and may result in greater or
earlier charges to earnings or reductions in its capital than generally accepted accounting principles would require. Compliance
with laws and regulations can be difficult and costly, and changes to laws and regulations often impose additional compliance
costs. Veritex’s failure to comply with these laws and regulations, even if the failure follows good faith effort or reflects a difference
in interpretation, could subject it to restrictions on its business activities, fines and other penalties, any of which could adversely
affect its results of operations, capital base and the price of its securities. Further, any new laws, rules and regulations could make
compliance more difficult or expensive or otherwise adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition and results of
operations.
State and federal banking agencies periodically conduct examinations of Veritex’s business, including its compliance with laws
and regulations, and failure to comply with any supervisory actions to which Veritex is or may become subject as a result of
such examinations could adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Texas and federal banking agencies, including the TDB and the Federal Reserve, periodically conduct examinations of
Veritex’s business, including its compliance with laws and regulations. If, as a result of an examination, a Texas or federal banking
agency were to determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity
or other aspects of any of Veritex’s operations had become unsatisfactory, or that Veritex, the Bank or their respective management
were in violation of any law or regulation, it may take a number of different remedial actions as it deems appropriate. These actions
include the power to prohibit “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative actions to correct any conditions resulting from
any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in Veritex’s capital
levels, to restrict its growth, to assess civil monetary penalties against Veritex, the Bank or their respective officers or directors,
to remove officers and directors and to terminate the Bank’s deposit insurance upon notice and hearing. If Veritex becomes subject
to such regulatory actions, its business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation could be adversely affected.
Many of Veritex’s new activities and expansion plans require regulatory approvals, and failure to obtain them may restrict
future growth.
Veritex intends to complement and expand its business by pursuing strategic acquisitions of financial institutions and
other complementary businesses. Generally, Veritex must receive state and federal regulatory approval before it can acquire a
depository institution insured by the FDIC or related business. In determining whether to approve a proposed acquisition, federal
banking regulators will consider, among other factors, the effect of the acquisition on competition, Veritex’s financial condition,
its future prospects and the impact of the proposal on U.S. financial stability. The regulators also review current and projected
capital ratios and levels, the competence, experience and integrity of management and its record of compliance with laws and
regulations, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served (including the acquiring institution’s record of compliance
under the CRA) and the effectiveness of the acquiring institution in combating money laundering activities. Such regulatory
approvals may not be granted on terms that are acceptable to it, or at all. Veritex may also be required to sell branches as a condition
29
to receiving regulatory approval, which condition may not be acceptable to it or, if acceptable to it, may reduce the benefit of any
acquisition.
In addition to the acquisition of existing financial institutions, as opportunities arise, Veritex plans to continue de novo
branching as a part of its organic growth strategy. De novo branching and any acquisitions carry with them numerous risks, including
the inability to obtain all required regulatory approvals. The failure to obtain these regulatory approvals for potential future strategic
acquisitions and de novo branches could impact Veritex’s business plans and restrict its growth.
Financial institutions, such as the Bank, face a risk of noncompliance and enforcement action with the Bank Secrecy Act and
other anti-money laundering statutes and regulations.
The Bank Secrecy Act, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept
and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, or the USA PATRIOT Act, and other laws and regulations require financial institutions, among
other duties, to institute and maintain an effective anti-money laundering program and file suspicious activity and currency
transaction reports as appropriate. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, established by the U.S. Department of the Treasury,
or the Treasury Department, to administer the Bank Secrecy Act, is authorized to impose significant civil money penalties for
violations of those requirements, and has recently engaged in coordinated enforcement efforts with the individual federal banking
regulators, as well as the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, and Internal Revenue Service. There is
also increased scrutiny of compliance with the sanctions programs and rules administered and enforced by the Treasury
Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control.
In order to comply with regulations, guidelines and examination procedures in this area, Veritex has dedicated significant
resources to its Bank Secrecy Act anti-money laundering programs. If its policies, procedures and systems are deemed deficient,
Veritex could be subject to liability, including fines and regulatory actions such as restrictions on its ability to pay dividends and
the necessity to obtain regulatory approvals to proceed with certain aspects of its business plans, such as acquisitions and de novo
branching.
Veritex is subject to the CRA and fair lending laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to material penalties.
The CRA, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act and other fair lending laws and regulations impose
nondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. The CFPB, the Justice Department and other federal agencies
are responsible for enforcing these laws and regulations. A successful challenge to an institution’s performance under the CRA or
fair lending laws and regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including the required payment of damages and civil
money penalties, injunctive relief, imposition of restrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity, and restrictions on expansion
activity. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s performance under fair lending laws in private class
action litigation.
The FDIC’s restoration plan and the related increased assessment rate could adversely affect Veritex’s earnings and results of
operations.
As a result of economic conditions and the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC revised its deposit insurance
assessment methodology, which has had the effect of raising deposit premiums for many insured depository institutions. If these
increases are insufficient for the DIF to meet its funding requirements, special assessments or increases in deposit insurance
premiums may be required. Veritex is generally unable to control the amount of premiums that it is required to pay for FDIC
insurance. If there are additional financial institution failures that affect the DIF, Veritex may be required to pay FDIC premiums
higher than current levels. Veritex’s FDIC insurance related costs were $1.2 million for each of the years ended December 31,
2018 and 2017, compared to $661 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2016. Any future additional assessments, increases
or required prepayments in FDIC insurance premiums could adversely affect Veritex’s earnings and results of operations.
Veritex is subject to increased capital requirements, which may adversely impact return on equity or prevent Veritex from paying
dividends or repurchasing shares.
The Dodd-Frank Act requires the federal banking agencies to establish stricter risk-based and leverage capital requirements
to apply to banks and bank and savings and loan holding companies. In 2013, the federal banking agencies adopted revised risk-
based and leverage capital requirements as well as a revised method for calculating risk-weighted assets. The capital rules apply
to all bank holding companies with $1 billion or more in consolidated assets and all banks regardless of size.
The revised capital rules subjected Veritex to higher required capital levels on January 1, 2015, with a phase-in period
for certain provisions over four years that began in 2016. As of January 1, 2019, the capital requirements were fully phased in.
30
The application of more stringent capital requirements on Veritex could, among other things, result in lower returns on equity,
require the raising of additional capital, and result in regulatory actions such as the inability to pay dividends or repurchase shares
if Veritex were to be unable to comply with such requirements.
EGRRCPA provides for a new community bank leverage ratio of between 8% and 10% for banking organizations with
no more than $10 billion in total consolidated assets in place of the current risk-based and leverage capital requirements,
including the capital conservation buffer. The federal banking agencies are still developing a regulation for this leverage ratio
and we cannot currently predict the possible impact of those regulations on our business at this time.
The Federal Reserve may require Veritex to commit capital resources to support the Bank.
A bank holding company is required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks and
to commit resources to support its subsidiary banks. The Federal Reserve may require a bank holding company to make capital
injections into a troubled subsidiary bank at times when the bank holding company may not be inclined to do so and may charge
the bank holding company with engaging in unsafe and unsound practices for failing to commit resources to such a subsidiary
bank. Accordingly, Veritex could be required to provide financial assistance to the Bank if it experiences financial distress.
Such a capital injection may be required at a time when Veritex’s resources are limited and it may be required to borrow
the funds to make the required capital injection. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, the bankruptcy trustee will
assume any commitment by the holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank.
Moreover, bankruptcy law provides that claims based on any such commitment will be entitled to a priority of payment over the
claims of the holding company’s general unsecured creditors, including the holders of any note obligations.
Veritex could be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions.
Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. Veritex
has exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial
services industry, including commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks and other institutional clients. Many of these
transactions expose Veritex to credit risk in the event of a default by a counterparty or client. In addition, Veritex’s credit risk may
be exacerbated when its collateral cannot be foreclosed upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of
the credit or derivative exposure due. Any such losses could adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve could adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition and
results of operations.
In addition to being affected by general economic conditions, Veritex’s earnings and growth are affected by the policies
of the Federal Reserve. An important function of the Federal Reserve is to regulate the U.S. money supply and credit conditions.
Among the instruments used by the Federal Reserve to implement these objectives are open market operations in U.S. government
securities, adjustments of both the discount rate and the federal funds rate and changes in reserve requirements against bank
deposits. These instruments are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic growth and the distribution of credit,
bank loans, investments and deposits. Their use also affects interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits.
The monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve have had a significant effect on the operating results of
commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. Although Veritex cannot determine the effects
of such policies on it at this time, such policies could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Veritex’s Common Stock
The market price of Veritex’s common stock may fluctuate significantly.
The market price of Veritex’s common stock could fluctuate significantly due to a number of factors, including, but not
limited to:
•
•
•
•
Veritex’s quarterly or annual earnings, or those of other companies in its industry;
actual or anticipated fluctuations in Veritex’s operating results;
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;
the public reaction to Veritex’s press releases, its other public announcements and its filings with the SEC;
31
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
announcements by Veritex or its competitors of significant acquisitions, dispositions, innovations or new
programs and services;
changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts that cover Veritex’s common stock
or the failure of securities analysts to cover Veritex’s common stock;
changes in earnings estimates by securities analysts or Veritex’s ability to meet those estimates;
the operating and stock price performance of other comparable companies;
general economic conditions and overall market fluctuations;
the trading volume of Veritex’s common stock;
changes in business, legal or regulatory conditions, or other developments affecting participants in Veritex’s
industry, and publicity regarding its business or any of its significant customers or competitors;
changes in governmental monetary policies, including the policies of the Federal Reserve;
future sales of Veritex’s common stock by Veritex or its directors, executive officers or significant shareholders;
and
changes in economic conditions in and political conditions affecting Veritex’s target markets.
In particular, the realization of any of the risks described in this “Item 1A. Risk Factors” could have a material adverse
effect on the market price of Veritex’s common stock and cause the value of your investment to decline. In addition, the stock
market in general has experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular
companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of Veritex’s common stock over the short,
medium or long-term, regardless of Veritex’s actual performance. If the market price of Veritex’s common stock reaches an elevated
level, it may materially and rapidly decline. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities,
shareholders have often instituted securities class action litigation. If Veritex were to be involved in a class action lawsuit, it could
divert the attention of senior management and could adversely affect Veritex’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
If securities or industry analysts change their recommendations regarding Veritex’s common stock or if Veritex’s operating
results do not meet their expectations, Veritex’s stock price could decline.
The trading market for Veritex’s common stock could be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities
analysts may publish about Veritex or its business. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of Veritex or fail to publish
reports on it regularly, Veritex could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause its stock price or trading
volume to decline. Moreover, if one or more of the analysts who cover Veritex downgrade its stock or if Veritex’s operating results
do not meet their expectations, either absolutely or relative to Veritex’s competitors, Veritex’s stock price could decline significantly.
Future sales or the possibility of future sales of a substantial amount of Veritex common stock may depress the price of shares
of Veritex’s common stock.
Future sales or the availability for sale of substantial amounts of Veritex’s common stock in the public market, or the
perception that these sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of Veritex’s common stock and could
impair its ability to raise capital through future sales of equity securities.
Veritex may issue shares of its common stock or other securities from time to time as consideration for future acquisitions
and investments and pursuant to compensation and incentive plans. If any such acquisition or investment is significant, the number
of shares of Veritex’s common stock, or the number or aggregate principal amount, as the case may be, of other securities that
Veritex may issue may in turn be substantial. Veritex may also grant registration rights covering those shares of its common stock
or other securities in connection with any such acquisitions and investments.
Veritex cannot predict the size of future issuances of its common stock or the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales
of its common stock will have on the market price of its common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of Veritex’s common stock
(including shares of its common stock issued in connection with an acquisition or under a compensation or incentive plan), or the
perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for its common stock and could impair
Veritex’s ability to raise capital through future sales of its securities.
The holders of Veritex’s debt obligations will have priority over Veritex’s common stock with respect to payment in the event
of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Veritex and with respect to the payment of interest and preferred dividends.
As of December 31, 2018, Veritex had approximately $5.0 million outstanding in aggregate principal amount of
subordinated promissory notes held by investors, and, in the aggregate, $11.7 million of junior subordinated debentures issued to
two statutory trusts that in turn issued $11.4 million in the aggregate of trust preferred securities. In the future, Veritex may incur
additional indebtedness. Upon Veritex’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of its common stock will not be entitled
32
to receive any payment or other distribution of assets until after all of Veritex’s obligations to its debt holders have been satisfied
and holders of trust preferred securities have received any payment or distribution due to them. In addition, Veritex is required to
pay interest on its outstanding indebtedness before it pays any dividends on its common stock. Since any decision to issue debt
securities or incur other borrowings in the future will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond Veritex’s control, the
amount, timing, nature or success of Veritex’s future capital raising efforts is uncertain. Thus, holders of Veritex’s common stock
bear the risk that Veritex’s future issuances of debt securities or its incurrence of other borrowings will negatively affect the market
price of its common stock.
Veritex depends on the Bank for cash flow, and the Bank’s ability to make cash distributions is restricted, which could impact
Veritex’s ability to satisfy its obligations.
Veritex’s primary asset is the Bank. As such, Veritex depends upon the Bank for cash distributions through dividends on
the Bank’s stock to pay Veritex’s operating expenses and satisfy its obligations, including debt obligations. There are numerous
laws and banking regulations that limit the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to Veritex. If the Bank is unable to pay dividends to
Veritex, Veritex will not be able to satisfy its obligations. Federal and state statutes and regulations restrict the Bank’s ability to
make cash distributions to Veritex. These statutes and regulations require, among other things, that the Bank maintain certain
levels of capital in order to pay a dividend. Further, federal and state banking authorities have the ability to restrict the Bank’s
payment of dividends through supervisory action.
Veritex’s dividend policy may change without notice, its future ability to pay dividends is subject to restrictions, and Veritex
may not pay dividends in the future.
In January 2019, we initiated a quarterly cash dividend on our common stock. Holders of our common stock are entitled
to receive only such cash dividends as our board of directors may declare out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends.
The timing, declaration, amount and payment of future cash dividends, if any, will be within the discretion of our board of directors
and will depend upon then-existing conditions, including our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements,
investment opportunities, growth opportunities, any legal, regulatory, contractual or other limitations on our ability to pay dividends
and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant. As a bank holding company, Veritex’s ability to pay dividends is also
affected by the policies and enforcement powers of the Federal Reserve and any future payment of dividends will depend on the
Bank’s ability to make distributions and payments to Veritex as its principal source of funds to pay such dividends. Veritex Bank
is also subject to various legal, regulatory and other restrictions on its ability to make distributions and payments to Veritex. In
addition, in the future, Veritex may enter into borrowing or other contractual arrangements that restrict its ability to pay dividends.
As a consequence of these various limitations and restrictions, Veritex may not be able to make, or may have to reduce or eliminate,
the payment of dividends on its common stock. Any change in the level of Veritex’s dividends or the suspension of the payment
thereof could have a material adverse effect on the market price of Veritex’s common stock. See also “Item 1. Business-Regulation
and Supervision-Regulatory Limits on Dividends and Distributions.”
The requirements of being a public company, including compliance with the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and
the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, may strain Veritex’s resources, increase its costs and distract management.
Veritex completed its initial public offering in October 2014. As a public company, Veritex incurs significant legal,
accounting and other expenses that it did not incur as a private company. Veritex also incur costs associated with its public company
reporting requirements and with corporate governance requirements, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, stock
exchange rules and the rules implemented by the SEC. These rules and regulations have increased Veritex’s legal and financial
compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. These rules and regulations also make it more difficult
and more expensive for Veritex to obtain director and officer liability insurance. As a result, it may be more difficult for Veritex
to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on its board of directors or as executive officers.
As of January 1, 2019, Veritex is no longer an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, and the reduced
disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies no longer apply to Veritex.
As of January 1, 2019, we no longer qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. Consequently,
we are now or will soon be subject to certain disclosure requirements that apply to other public companies but did not previously
apply to us due to our previous status as an emerging growth company. These requirements include:
•
requirement to provide an auditor’s attestation report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our
system of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
33
•
•
•
compliance with any new requirements proposed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board requiring
mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report in which the auditor would be required to
provide additional information about the audit and the financial statements of the issuer;
full disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation; and
compliance with the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and
shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.
Compliance with these additional requirements may increase our compliance and financial reporting expenses and may
divert management’s attention from other aspects of our business. Failure to comply with these requirements could subject us to
enforcement actions by the SEC, which could divert management’s attention, damage our reputation and adversely affect our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
Shareholders may be deemed to be acting in concert or otherwise in control of Veritex, which could impose notice, approval
and ongoing regulatory requirements upon them and result in adverse regulatory consequences for such holders.
Veritex is a bank holding company regulated by the Federal Reserve. Banking laws impose notice, approval and ongoing
regulatory requirements on any shareholder or other party that seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of an FDIC-insured
depository institution or a company that controls an FDIC-insured depository institution, such as a bank holding company. These
laws include the BHC Act and the Change in Bank Control Act. The determination as to whether an investor “controls” a depository
institution or holding company is based on all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the investment.
As a general matter, a party is deemed to control a depository institution or other company if the party (1) owns or controls
25.0% or more of any class of voting stock of the bank or other company, (2) controls the election of a majority of the directors
of the bank or other company, or (3) has the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of the bank
or other company. In addition, subject to rebuttal, a party may be presumed to control a depository institution or other company
if the investor owns or controls 10.0% or more of any class of voting stock. Ownership by affiliated parties, or parties acting in
concert, is typically aggregated for these purposes. “Acting in concert” generally means knowing participation in a joint activity
or parallel action towards the common goal of acquiring control of a bank or a parent company, whether or not pursuant to an
express agreement. The manner in which this definition is applied in individual circumstances can vary and cannot always be
predicted with certainty.
Any shareholder that is deemed to “control” Veritex for regulatory purposes would become subject to notice, approval
and ongoing regulatory requirements and may be subject to adverse regulatory consequences. Potential investors are advised to
consult with their legal counsel regarding the applicable regulations and requirements.
An investment in Veritex’s common stock is not an insured deposit and is not guaranteed by the FDIC, so you could lose some
or all of your investment.
An investment in Veritex’s common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss or guaranteed
by the FDIC, any other deposit insurance fund or by any other public or private entity. An investment in Veritex’s common stock
is inherently risky for the reasons described herein. As a result, if you acquire Veritex’s common stock, you could lose some or
all of your investment.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
34
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
At December 31, 2018, our executive offices were located at 8214 Westchester Drive, Suite 800, Dallas, Texas 75225.
In addition to our executive offices, at December 31, 2018, we had 20 full-service branches and one mortgage office located in
the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and one full-service branch in the Houston metropolitan area. We own the building in which our
executive offices are located and lease the majority of the space in which our other administrative offices are located. As of
December 31, 2018, we owned eleven of our branch locations and leased the mortgage office and remaining ten branch locations.
The remaining terms of our leases on our full-services branches range from one to five years and give us the option to renew for
subsequent terms of equal duration or otherwise extend the lease term subject to price adjustment based on market conditions at
the time of renewal. The net book value of our investment in premises, equipment and leaseholds, excluding computer equipment,
was approximately $77.0 million at December 31, 2018. We believe that our current facilities are adequate to meet the present
and immediately foreseeable needs of the Bank and the Company.
For more information about our bank premises and equipment and operating leases, please see Note 6 and Note 15 of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 15 of this report.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are from time to time subject to claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. These claims and
litigation may include, among other things, allegations of violation of banking and other applicable regulations, competition laws,
labor laws and consumer protection laws, as well as claims or litigation relating to intellectual property, securities, breach of
contract and tort. We intend to defend ourselves vigorously against any pending or future claims and litigation.
At this time, in the opinion of management, the likelihood is remote that the impact of such proceedings, either individually
or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash
flows. However, one or more unfavorable outcomes in any claim or litigation against us could have a material adverse effect for
the period in which they are resolved. In addition, regardless of their merits or their ultimate outcomes, such matters are costly,
divert management’s attention and may materially adversely affect our reputation, even if resolved in our favor.
ITEM 4. MINE AND SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information for Common Stock
Shares of our common stock are traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “VBTX”. Our shares have been
traded on the Nasdaq Global Market since October 9, 2014. Prior to that date, there was no public trading market for our common
stock.
Holders of Record
As of February 26, 2019, there were 465 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividend Policy
To date, we have not paid cash dividends on our common stock. In January 2019, our board of directors declared the
initiation of a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.125 per share on our outstanding common stock. The dividend was paid on
February 21, 2019 to shareholders of record as of February 7, 2019.
The timing, declaration, amount and payment of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of our board of directors
and will depend on many factors, including our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, investment
opportunities, growth opportunities, any legal, regulatory, contractual or other limitations on our ability to pay dividends and other
factors our board of directors may deem relevant. In addition, there are regulatory restrictions on our ability and the ability of the
35
Bank to pay dividends. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors-Veritex’s dividend policy may change without notice, its future ability to pay
dividends is subject to restrictions, and Veritex may not pay dividends in the future” and “Item 1. Business-Regulation and
Supervision-Regulatory Limits on Dividends and Distributions.”
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
See “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters”.
Stock Performance Graph
The following table and graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock to the cumulative
total return of our peer group and the Nasdaq Bank Index for the period beginning on October 9, 2014, the first day of trading of
our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market through December 31, 2018. The following information reflects index values as
of close of trading, assumes $100 invested on October 9, 2014 in our common stock, the peer group and the Nasdaq Bank Index,
and assumes the reinvestment of dividends, if any. The historical stock price performance for our common stock shown below is
not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.
Veritex Holdings, Inc.
Peer Group(1)
October 9,
2014
December 31,
2014
December 31,
2015
December 31,
2016
December 31,
2017
December 31,
2018
$
100.00
$
101.58
$
116.20
$
191.47
$
197.79
$
100.00
98.75
93.62
145.10
159.48
153.26
127.11
Nasdaq Bank Index
134.64
(1) Our peer group includes Bancfirst Corporation, Cadence Bancorp LLC, Chemical Financial Corporation, CVB Financial Corp., Eagle Bancorp, Inc., First
Financial Bankshares, Inc., Allegiance Bancshares, Inc., Origin Bancorp, Inc., Hilltop Holdings, Inc., Independent Bank Group, Inc., LegacyTexas Financial
Group, Inc., Servisfirst Bancshares, Inc., Simmons First Nation Corporation, Southside Bancshares, Inc. and Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc.
117.34
164.00
100.00
110.05
158.44
Comparison of Cumulative Total Return
e
u
l
a
V
x
e
d
n
I
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
10/9/2014
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
12/31/2016
12/31/2017
12/31/2018
Period Ending
Peer Group
NASDAQ Bank
VBTX
Stock Repurchases
No purchases of our common stock were made by or on behalf of us or any “affiliated purchaser” as defined in Rule
10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act during the year ended December 31, 2018. In January 2019, our board of directors authorized
a stock buyback program pursuant to which we may, from time to time, purchase up to $50.0 million of our outstanding common
stock (the “Stock Buyback Program”). The shares may be repurchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions
from time to time, depending upon market conditions and other factors, and in accordance with applicable regulations of the SEC.
36
The Stock Buyback Program expires on December 31, 2019 and does not obligate the Company to purchase any shares. The Stock
Buyback Program may be terminated or amended by the board of directors at any time prior to its expiration.
37
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Selected Period-end Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities
Total loans(1)
Allowance for loan losses
Goodwill
Intangibles
Noninterest-bearing deposits
Interest-bearing deposits
Total deposits
Advances from FHLB
Other borrowings
Total stockholders’ equity
Selected Income Statement Data:
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Income before income tax
Income tax expense
Net income
Preferred dividends
Net income available to common stockholders
Share Data:
Basic earnings per common share
Diluted earnings per common share
Book value per common share
Tangible book value per common share(2)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets(3)
Return on average equity(3)
Net interest margin(4)
Efficiency ratio(5)
Loans to deposits ratio
Summary Credit Quality Ratios:
Nonperforming assets to total assets
Nonperforming loans to total loans
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
Capital Ratios:
Total stockholders’ equity to total assets
Tangible common equity to tangible assets(6)
Tier 1 capital to average assets(3)
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
$
3,208,550
$
2,945,583
$
1,408,507
$
1,039,551
$
802,231
84,449
262,695
149,044
228,117
2,555,509
2,233,518
19,255
161,447
15,896
626,283
1,996,145
2,622,428
28,019
16,691
530,638
12,808
159,452
20,441
612,830
1,665,800
2,278,630
71,164
31,689
488,929
234,791
102,559
991,897
8,524
26,865
2,181
327,614
792,016
1,119,630
38,306
8,035
239,088
71,551
75,813
820,567
6,772
26,865
2,410
301,367
567,043
868,410
28,444
8,027
132,046
$
114,189
$
68,508
$
40,955
$
31,459
$
6,603
107,586
11,910
69,259
50,237
10,896
39,341
—
39,341
1.63
1.60
21.88
14.57
24,169
24,590
$
$
$
$
5,114
63,394
7,576
42,789
28,181
13,029
15,152
42
15,110
0.82
0.80
20.28
12.75
18,404
18,810
$
$
2,050
38,905
6,503
26,390
19,018
6,467
12,551
—
12,551
1.16
1.13
15.73
13.82
10,849
11,058
$
$
868
30,591
3,704
21,388
12,907
4,117
8,790
98
8,692
0.86
0.84
12.33
9.59
10,061
10,332
$
$
93,251
45,127
603,310
5,981
19,148
1,261
251,124
387,619
638,743
40,000
8,019
113,312
25,340
1,423
23,917
2,496
18,503
7,910
2,705
5,205
80
5,125
0.73
0.72
11.12
8.96
6,992
7,152
1.26%
0.76%
1.06%
0.98%
0.75%
7.73
4.09
54.92
97.45
0.77%
0.97
77.81
0.75
0.01
4.54
3.77
56.24
98.02
0.03%
0.02
2,651.76
0.57
0.06
8.80
3.72
55.61
88.59
0.17%
0.18
479.95
0.86
0.03
6.94
3.80
60.83
94.50
0.05%
0.08
6.28
3.78
66.47
94.45
0.07%
0.07
1,003.26
1,371.79
0.83
0.01
0.99
0.08
16.54%
16.60%
16.97%
12.70%
14.12%
11.12
12.92
12.48
12.03
13.16
15.23
16.82
20.72
20.42
22.02
10.17
10.75
12.85
12.48
14.25
10.86
12.66
15.45
n/a
17.21
11.66
12.04
12.18
11.80
12.98
38
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Total loans does not include loans held for sale and deferred fees. Loans held for sale were $1.3 million as of December 31, 2018, $0.8
million as of December 31, 2017, $5.2 million as of December 31, 2016, $2.8 million as of December 31, 2015 and $8.9 million as
of December 31, 2014. Deferred fees were $15 thousand as of December 31, 2018, $28 thousand of December 31, 2017, $55 thousand
as of December 31, 2016, $62 thousand as of December 31, 2015 and $51 thousand as of December 31, 2014.
We calculate tangible book value per common share as total stockholders’ equity less goodwill and intangible assets, net of accumulated
amortization, divided by the number of common shares outstanding at the end of the relevant period. Tangible book value per common
share is a non-GAAP financial measure and the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is
book value per common share. See our reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP
financial measures in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Non-GAAP
Financial Measures.”
Except as otherwise indicated in this footnote, we calculate our average assets and average equity for a period by dividing the sum of
our total assets or total stockholders’ equity, as the case may be, as of the close of business on each day in the relevant period, by the
number of days in the period. We have calculated our return on average assets and return on average equity for a period by dividing
net income for that period by our average assets and average equity, as the case may be, for that period.
Net interest margin represents net interest income, annualized, divided by average interest-earning assets.
Efficiency ratio represents noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income.
We calculate tangible common equity as total stockholders’ equity less goodwill and intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization,
and we calculate tangible assets as total assets less goodwill and intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization. We calculate
tangible common equity to tangible assets as tangible common equity divided by tangible assets. Tangible common equity to tangible
assets is a non-GAAP financial measure and the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is
total stockholders’ equity to total assets. See our reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable
GAAP financial measures in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Non-
GAAP Financial Measures.”
39
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction
with “Item 6. Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included Item 8 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that are subject to certain
risks and uncertainties and are based on certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable but may prove to be inaccurate. Certain
risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those set forth in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected results discussed in the forward-looking statements
appearing in this discussion and analysis. We assume no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a bank holding company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. Through our wholly owned subsidiary, Veritex
Community Bank, a Texas state chartered bank, we provide relationship-driven commercial banking products and services tailored
to meet the needs of small to medium-sized businesses and professionals. Beginning at our inception in 2010, we initially targeted
customers and focused our acquisitions primarily in the Dallas metropolitan area, which we consider to be Dallas and the adjacent
communities in North Dallas.Our current primary market now includes the broader Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and the Houston
metropolitan area. As we continue to grow, we may expand to other metropolitan markets in Texas.
Our business is conducted through one reportable segment, community banking, where we generate the majority of our
revenues from interest income on loans and securities, customer service and loan fees and gains on sale of Small Business
Administration (“SBA”) guaranteed loans and mortgage loans. We incur interest expense on deposits and other borrowed funds
and noninterest expense, such as salaries and employee benefits and occupancy expenses. We analyze our ability to maximize
income generated from interest-earning assets and expense of our liabilities through our net interest margin. Net interest margin
is a ratio calculated as net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. Net interest income is the difference between
interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such
as deposits and borrowings, which are used to fund those assets.
Changes in the market interest rates and interest rates we earn on interest-earning assets or pay on interest-bearing
liabilities, as well as the volume and types of interest-earning assets, interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing liabilities and
stockholders’ equity, are usually the largest drivers of periodic changes in net interest spread, net interest margin and net interest
income. Fluctuations in market interest rates are driven by many factors, including governmental monetary policies, inflation,
deflation, macroeconomic developments, changes in unemployment, the money supply, political and international conditions and
conditions in domestic and foreign financial markets. Periodic changes in the volume and types of loans in our loan portfolio are
affected by, among other factors, economic and competitive conditions in Texas and specifically in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex
and Houston metropolitan area, as well as developments affecting the real estate, technology, financial services, insurance,
transportation, manufacturing and energy sectors within our target market and throughout the State of Texas.
2018 Highlights
Green Bancorp, Inc.
On July 23, 2018, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Green, the parent holding company for Green
Bank, in an all-stock merger valued at approximately $1 billion. The agreement provided for the merger of Green and Green Bank
with and into Veritex and Veritex Community Bank, respectively. At the effective time of the merger, each share of Green common
stock was converted into the right to receive 0.79 shares of Veritex common stock, with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares of
Veritex common stock. The acquisition closed on January 1, 2019.
40
Anticipated Trends
This discussion of trends expected to impact our business in 2019 is based on information presently available and reflects
certain assumptions, including assuming a continuation of the current economic and low rate environment. Differences in actual
economic conditions compared with our assumptions could have a material impact on our results. See “Special Cautionary Notice
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional
factors that could cause results to differ materially from those contemplated by the following forward-looking statements. We
anticipate the following trends or events related to our business in fiscal year 2019:
•
Successful completion of our recent acquisition of Green and expected meaningful costs savings and consolidation of
our back office functions
• Continued emphasis on credit quality and relationship banking.
• Continued leverage of our strong capital through accretive organic growth and merger and acquisition opportunities.
• Net charge-offs to remain low, with continued solid performance of the overall loan portfolio.
Results of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017
General
Net income available to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $39.3 million, an increase of
$24.2 million, or 160.4%, from net income available to common stockholders of $15.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2017.
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $1.63, an increase of $0.81 from $0.82 for
the year ended December 31, 2017. Diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $1.60, an increase of
$0.80 from $0.80 for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Net Interest Income
Our operating results depend primarily on our net interest income, calculated as the difference between interest income
on interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and
borrowings. Fluctuations in market interest rates impact the yield and rates paid on interest sensitive assets and liabilities. Changes
in the amount and type of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities also impact net interest income. The variance
driven by the changes in the amount and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is referred to as a “volume
change.” Changes in yields earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and other borrowed funds
are referred to as “rate changes.”
To evaluate net interest income, we measure and monitor (1) yields on our loans and other interest-earning assets, (2) the
costs of our deposits and other funding sources, (3) our net interest spread and (4) our net interest margin. Net interest spread is
the difference between rates earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is
a ratio calculated as net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. Because noninterest-bearing sources of funds,
such as noninterest-bearing deposits and stockholders’ equity, also fund interest-earning assets, net interest margin includes the
benefit of these noninterest-bearing sources.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, net interest income totaled $114.2 million compared to net interest income of
$68.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $45.7 million, or 66.7%. This increase was primarily due to
a $64.7 million, or 81.3%, increase in interest income resulting from growth in the Company’s average interest-earning assets
which was partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $19.0 million, or 172.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Interest income was $144.2 million, compared to $79.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The primary drivers of increased interest income was the growth on interest earned on average loans, accretion recognized on
acquired loans, increased volumes in all loan categories and benefits of increases in the prime rate for new and renewed loans.
Interest earned on average loans outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to average loans outstanding for
the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $60.7 million, or 82.2%. The growth in average loans was the result of new loan
originations and growth of existing customer loan balances. Average loan balances grew from $1.4 billion for the year ended
December 31, 2017 to $2.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase of $941.7 million, or 65.3%.
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $30.0 million, compared to $11.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2017, an increase of $19.0 million, or 172.0%. The year-over-year increase was due to the growth of average interest-
bearing liabilities of $773.2 million, or 63.6%, primarily due to the increase in interest bearing liabilities assumed from Sovereign
41
and Liberty, as Veritex realized a full year of interest expense on both Sovereign and Liberty interest-bearing liabilities in the year
ending December 31, 2018, organic growth in average interest-bearing deposits and a change in deposit mix.
Net interest margin and net interest spread were 4.09% and 3.66%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2018
compared to 3.77% and 3.48%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase in net interest margin by 32
basis points and increase in net interest spread by 18 basis points was due to an increase in the average yield earned on interest-
bearing assets by 78 basis points, which was offset by an increase in the average yield paid on interest-bearing liabilities by 60
basis points. The average interest earned on interest-bearing assets increased to 5.17% during the year ended December 31, 2018
from 4.39% for the year ended December 31, 2017. The average interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased to 1.51%
during the year ended December 31, 2018 from 0.91% for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, an analysis of net interest income by each major category of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the average amounts outstanding and the interest earned or paid on such
amounts. The table also sets forth the average rate earned on interest-earning assets, the average rate paid on interest-bearing
liabilities, and the net interest margin on average total interest-earning assets for the same periods. Interest earned on loans that
are classified as non-accrual is not recognized in income; however, the balances are reflected in average outstanding balances for
the period. For the year ended December 31, 2018, interest income not recognized on non-accrual loans, excluding purchased
credit impaired (“PCI”) loans, was $724 thousand. For the year ended December 31, 2017, interest income not recognized on non-
accrual loans was minimal. Any non-accrual loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.
42
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Total loans(1)(2)
Securities available for sale
Interest-earning deposits in financial institutions
Investment in subsidiary
Total interest-earning assets
Allowance for loan losses
Noninterest-earning assets(2)
Total assets
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits(2)
Certificates and other time deposits
Advances from FHLB
Other borrowings
Total interest-bearing liabilities
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing deposits(2)
Other liabilities(2)
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Net interest spread
Net interest income
Net interest margin
For the Year Ended December 31,
2018
Interest
Earned/
Interest
Paid
Average
Outstanding
Balance
Average
Yield/
Rate
Average
Outstanding
Balance
2017
Interest
Earned/
Interest
Paid
Average
Yield/
Rate
$ 2,382,946
$ 134,460
5.64% $ 1,441,295
$ 73,795
247,163
160,402
340
6,605
3,149
20
2.67%
1.96%
5.88%
170,253
202,314
202
3,462
2,287
8
2,790,851
144,234
5.17%
1,814,064
79,552
(15,324)
356,901
$ 3,132,428
(9,567)
176,471
$ 1,980,968
$ 1,277,186
17,599
1.38% $
871,212
8,981
608,041
87,366
16,748
9,714
1,701
1,031
1.60%
1.95%
6.16%
279,821
51,196
13,878
897
531
635
1,989,341
30,045
1.51%
1,216,107
11,044
621,613
12,456
2,623,410
509,018
$ 3,132,428
425,124
6,802
1,648,033
332,935
$ 1,980,968
$ 114,189
3.66%
4.09%
$ 68,508
5.12%
2.03%
1.13%
3.96%
4.39%
1.03%
0.32%
1.04%
4.58%
0.91%
3.48%
3.77%
(1)
Includes average outstanding balances of loans held for sale of $1,198 and $2,493 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(2)
Includes average outstanding balances of branch assets and liabilities held for sale in total loans, noninterest-bearing assets, interest-bearing deposits,
noninterest-bearing deposits and other liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2017.
43
The following table presents the changes in interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated for each major
component of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and distinguishes between the changes attributable to changes
in volume and changes attributable to changes in interest rates. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and
volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated to rate.
Interest-earning assets:
Total loans
Securities available for sale
Interest-earning deposits in financial institutions
Investment in subsidiary
Total increase in interest income
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits
Certificates and other time deposits
Advances from FHLB
Other borrowings
Total increase in interest expense
Increase (decrease) in net interest income
Provision for Loan Losses
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Compared to 2017
Increase (Decrease) Due To
Volume
Rate
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
$
53,109
$
7,556
$
2,053
(821)
8
54,349
5,602
5,252
705
177
11,736
1,090
1,683
4
10,333
3,016
3,565
465
219
7,265
$
42,613
$
3,068
$
60,665
3,143
862
12
64,682
8,618
8,817
1,170
396
19,001
45,681
Our provision for loan losses is a charge to income in order to bring our allowance for loan losses to a level deemed
appropriate by management. For a description of the factors taken into account by management in determining the allowance for
loan losses see “—Financial Condition—Allowance for Loan Losses.” The provision for loan losses was $6.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2018, compared to $5.1 million for the same period in 2017, an increase of $1.5 million, or 29.1%. The
increase in provision expense was attributable to continued execution and success of our organic growth strategy and an increase
in specific reserves on certain non-performing loans, including $1.3 million in specific reserves recorded on PCI loans that were
placed on non-accrual status after the Company obtained information that precluded it from reasonably estimating the timing and
amount of future cash flows. In addition, net charge-offs decreased $674 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared
to the same period in 2017.
Noninterest Income
Our primary sources of recurring noninterest income are service charges and fees on deposit accounts, loan fees, (loss)
gain on the sale of investment securities, gains on the sale of loans and other assets owned and rental income. Noninterest income
does not include loan origination fees to the extent they exceed the direct loan origination costs, which are generally recognized
over the life of the related loan as an adjustment to yield using the interest method.
44
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of noninterest income:
For the Year Ended
December 31,
2018
2017
(Dollars in thousands)
Increase
(Decrease)
Noninterest income:
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts
$
3,420
$
2,502
$
Loan fees
(Loss) gain on sales of investment securities
Gain on sales of loans and other assets owned
Rental income
Other
Total noninterest income
1,332
(64)
3,056
1,654
2,512
657
222
3,141
139
915
$
11,910
$
7,576
$
918
675
(286)
(85)
1,515
1,597
4,334
Noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2018 increased $4.3 million, or 57.2%, to $11.9 million compared
to noninterest income of $7.6 million for the same period in 2017. The primary components of the increase were as follows:
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts. We earn service charges and fees from our customers for deposit-related
activities. The income from these deposit activities constitutes a significant and predictable component of our noninterest income.
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts were $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase of $918
thousand, or 36.7%, over the same period in 2017. This increase was primarily attributable to acquisitions and organic growth in
the number of deposit accounts.
Loan fees. Loan fees were $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $657 thousand for the same
period in 2017. The increase of $675 thousand was primarily attributable to acquisitions and organic loan growth.
Rental income. Rental income increased $1.5 million from $139 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2017. This
increase resulted from the purchase of our corporate headquarter building during the fourth quarter of 2017 and the corresponding
rental income from leasing space to tenants.
Other. Other noninterest income was $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase of $1.6 million, or
174.5%, compared to the same period in 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $428 thousand increase in dividend income
as a result of bi-annual Federal Reserve Bank stock dividends attributable to additional purchases of Federal Reserve Bank stock
and a $355 thousand gain on sale of assets resulting from the completion of the sale of certain assets and liabilities associated with
two branch locations in the Austin market during the year ended December 31, 2018.
45
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense is composed of all employee expenses and costs associated with operating our facilities, acquiring
and retaining customer relationships and providing bank services. The major component of noninterest expense is salaries and
employee benefits. Noninterest expense also includes operational expenses, such as occupancy expenses, depreciation and
amortization of office equipment, professional fees and regulatory fees, including Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”)
assessments, data processing expenses, and advertising and promotion expenses.
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits
Non-staff expenses:
Occupancy and equipment
Professional and regulatory fees
Data processing and software expense
FDIC assessment fees
Marketing
Amortization of intangibles
Telephone and communications
Merger and acquisition expense
Other
Total noninterest expense
For the Year Ended
December 31,
2018
2017
(Dollars in thousands)
Increase
(Decrease)
$
31,138
$
20,828
$
10,310
10,679
6,132
3,020
1,150
1,783
3,467
1,299
5,220
5,371
5,618
2,981
2,217
1,177
1,293
964
720
2,691
4,300
5,061
3,151
803
(27)
490
2,503
579
2,529
1,071
$
69,259
$
42,789
$
26,470
Noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 increased $26.5 million, or 61.9%, to $69.3 million compared
to noninterest expense of $42.8 million for the same period in 2017. The most significant components of the increase were as
follows:
Salaries and employee benefits. Salaries and employee benefits include payroll expenses, the cost of incentive
compensation, benefit plans, health insurance and payroll taxes. The level of employee expense is impacted by the amount of
direct loan origination costs which are required to be deferred in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
310-20. Salaries and employee benefits were $31.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase of $10.3 million,
or 49.5%, compared to the same period in 2017. The increase was primarily attributable to increased employee compensation of
$9.6 million resulting from a higher headcount over the full year related to the Sovereign and Liberty acquisitions, a $2.6 million
increase in incentive costs primarily related to increased stock compensation and a $641 thousand increase in lender incentives
and employee bonuses. Employee benefits and payroll taxes also increased $1.4 million, compared to the same period in 2017
due to higher employee headcount. These increases in salaries and employee benefits were partially offset by direct loan origination
costs which increased $4.0 million as a result of the growth in loans during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the
same period in 2017.
Occupancy and equipment. Occupancy and equipment expense includes lease expense, building depreciation and related
facilities costs as well as furniture, fixture and equipment depreciation, small equipment purchases and maintenance expense. Our
expense associated with occupancy and equipment was $10.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $5.6
million for the same period in 2017. The increase of $5.1 million, or 90.1%, was primarily due to the $1.5 million consent fee
paid in connection with the execution of an assignment agreement in the first quarter of 2018 to assign one of our branch leases
that we ceased using during 2017. The increase was also related to higher depreciation expense and property taxes of $907 thousand
and $837 thousand, respectively, recognized due to the purchase of our corporate headquarters in December 2017. We also
recognized increased rent expense of $534 thousand and increased depreciation on equipment of $476 thousand as a result of an
increase in leased branches and owned equipment from the acquisitions of Sovereign and Liberty.
46
Professional and regulatory fees. This category includes legal, investment bank, director, stock transfer agent fees and
other public company services, information technology support, audit services and regulatory assessment expense. Professional
and regulatory fees were $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase of $3.1 million, or 75.1%, compared to
the same period in 2017. This increase was primarily the result of increased information technology professional support services
and loan-related legal fees.
Amortization of intangibles. Amortization of intangibles was $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, an
increase of $2.5 million or 259.6%, compared to $964 thousand for the same period in 2017. This increase was due to a $1.5
million increase in amortization expense of the lease commission intangibles related to the purchase of our corporate headquarters
building in December of 2017 as the Company recognized a full year of amortization expense. It was also related to increased
amortization expense of core deposit intangible (“CDI”) as the Company recognized a full year of amortization expense on core
deposits acquired in the acquisitions of Sovereign and Liberty in 2017.
Merger and acquisition expense. Merger and acquisition expense includes legal, professional, audit, regulatory and other
expenses incurred in connections with a merger or acquisition. Merger and acquisition expense was $5.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2018, an increase of $2.5 million, or 94.0%, compared to the same period in 2017. This increase was primarily
the result of increased legal and professional fees related to our acquisition of Green which closed on January 1, 2019. The
Company incurred $2.3 million in professional services fees, $1.6 million in legal expenses, $468 thousand in data processing
expenses, $398 thousand in severance costs and $383 thousand in IT support related to mergers and acquisitions during the year
ended December 31, 2018.
Other. This category includes operating and administrative expenses including loan operations and collections, supplies
and printing, online and card interchange expense, ATM/debit card processing, postage and delivery, bank-owned life insurance
(“BOLI”) mortality expense, insurance and security expenses. Other noninterest expense increased $1.1 million, or 24.9%, to $5.4
million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $4.3 million for the same period in 2017 primarily related to higher
insurance expense of $408 thousand, security expense of $291 thousand, ATM and interchange expenses of $225 thousand, and
supplies and printing expense of $219, each resulting from our continued organic growth and growth through acquisitions.
Income tax expense. The amount of income tax expense is a function of our pre-tax income, tax-exempt income and other
nondeductible expenses. Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect current statutory income tax rates in effect for the period in
which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. Valuation allowances are established when
necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. As of December 31, 2018, the Company did not
believe a valuation allowance was necessary.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, income tax expense totaled $10.9 million, a decrease of $2.1 million, or 16.4%,
compared to $13.0 million for the same period in 2017. Our effective tax rate decreased from 46.2% for the year ended December
31, 2017 to 21.7% for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax
Act”) on December 22, 2017 which lowered our federal statutory income tax rate to 21%, effective on January 1, 2018, and resulted
in significant modifications to existing tax law. The higher effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2017 reflects an
income tax charge of $3.1 million related to the re-measurement of our deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at the new
effective tax rate resulting from the enactment of the Tax Act. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 118, a
company may adjust its initial assumptions and judgments, not to exceed one year from enactment, upon obtaining, preparing or
analyzing additional information about facts and circumstances that existed as of the enactment date that, if known, would have
affected the income tax effects initially reported as provisional amounts. We recognized a discrete tax expense of $34 thousand
during the year ended December 31, 2018 resulting from the finalization of those calculations. For further information, see Note
12 – Income Taxes in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
Results of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016
General
Net income available to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $15.1 million, an increase of
$2.5 million, or 20.4%, from net income available to common stockholders of $12.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2016. Net income available to common stockholders for 2017 was negatively impacted by a $3.1 million re-measurement of our
deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities due to our new effective tax rate under the Tax Act.
47
Basic earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $0.82, a decrease of $0.34 from $1.16 for the year
ended December 31, 2016. Diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $0.80, a decrease of $0.33 from
$1.13 for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Net Interest Income
For the year ended December 31, 2017, net interest income totaled $68.5 million compared with net interest income of
$41.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, an increase of $27.5 million, or 67.3%. This increase was primarily due to
a $32.9 million, or 70.7%, increase in interest income resulting from growth in the Company’s average interest-earning assets
which was partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $5.4 million, or 95.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Interest income was $79.5 million and $46.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The primary
driver of increased interest income was the growth on interest earned on average loans. Interest earned on average loans outstanding
for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to average loans outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased
$29.1 million, or 65.2%. The growth in average loans was the result of the Sovereign and Liberty acquisitions, which closed in
August and December of 2017, respectively, new loan originations, and growth of existing customer loan balances. Average loan
balances grew from $924.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $1.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017,
an increase of $516.8 million, or 55.9%.
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $11.0 million, compared to $5.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2016, an increase of $5.4 million, or 95.8%. The year-over-year increase was due to growth of average interest
bearing-liabilities of $475.4 million, or 64.2%, primarily due to the increase in interest-bearing liabilities assumed from Sovereign
and Liberty and organic growth in average interest bearing deposits, advances from FHLB, and other borrowings.
Net interest margin and net interest spread were 3.77% and 3.48%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2017
compared to 3.72% and 3.47%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in net interest margin by 5 basis
points and increase in net interest spread by 1 basis point was due to an increase in the average yield earned on interest-bearing
assets by 16 basis points, which was offset by an increase in the average yield paid on interest-bearing liabilities by 15 basis points.
The average interest earned on interest-bearing assets increased to 4.39% during the year ended December 31, 2017 from 4.23%
for the year ended December 31, 2016. The average interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased to 0.91% during the year
ended December 31, 2017 from 0.76% for the year ended December 31, 2016.
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, an analysis of net interest income by each major category of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the average amounts outstanding and the interest earned or paid on such
amounts. The table also sets forth the average rate earned on interest-earning assets, the average rate paid on interest-bearing
liabilities, and the net interest margin on average total interest-earning assets for the same periods. Interest earned on loans that
are classified as non-accrual is not recognized in income; however, the balances are reflected in average outstanding balances for
the period. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, interest income not recognized on non-accrual loans was minimal.
Any non-accrual loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.
48
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Total loans(1)(2)
Securities available for sale
Interest-earning deposits in financial institutions
Investment in subsidiary
Total interest-earning assets
Allowance for loan losses
Noninterest-earning assets(2)
Total assets
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing and savings deposits(2)
Certificates and other time deposits(2)
Advances from FHLB
Other borrowings
Total interest-bearing liabilities
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing deposits(2)
Other liabilities
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
For the Year Ended December 31,
2017
Interest
Earned/
Interest
Paid
Average
Outstanding
Balance
2016
Interest
Earned/
Interest
Paid
Average
Yield/
Rate
Average
Yield/
Rate
Average
Outstanding
Balance
(Dollars in thousands)
$1,441,295
$ 73,795
5.12% $ 924,465
$ 44,681
4.83%
170,253
202,314
202
3,462
2,287
8
1,814,064
79,552
2.03
1.13
3.96
4.39
84,558
93,199
93
1,409
503
2
1,102,315
46,595
1.67
0.54
2.15
4.23
(9,567)
176,471
$1,980,968
(7,743)
94,199
$1,188,771
$ 871,212
$
8,981
1.03% $ 506,464
$
3,577
0.71%
279,821
51,196
13,878
897
531
635
1,216,107
11,044
0.32
1.04
4.58
0.91
182,514
1,411
43,649
8,077
260
392
740,704
5,640
0.77
0.60
4.85
0.76
425,124
6,802
431,926
332,935
302,548
2,937
305,485
142,583
$1,188,772
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$1,980,968
Net interest rate spread
Net interest income
Net interest margin
$ 68,508
3.48%
3.77%
$ 40,955
3.47%
3.72%
(1)
(2)
Includes average outstanding balances of loans held for sale of $2,493, and $5,078 and deferred loan fees of $19 and $54 for
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Includes average outstanding balances of branch assets and liabilities held for sale in total loans, noninterest-bearing assets,
interest bearing deposits, noninterest-bearing deposits and other liabilities.
49
The following table presents the changes in interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated for each major
component of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and distinguishes between the changes attributable to changes
in volume and changes attributable to changes in interest rates. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and
volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated to rate.
Interest-earning assets:
Total loans
Securities available for sale
Interest-earning deposits in other banks
Investment in subsidiary
Total increase (decrease) in interest income
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits
Certificates and other time deposits
Subordinated debentures and subordinated notes
Other borrowings
Total increase (decrease) in interest expense
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2017 vs. 2016
Increase
(Decrease)
Due to Change in
Volume
Rate
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
$
26,462
$
2,652
$
29,114
1,740
1,233
4
29,439
3,757
311
78
266
4,412
313
551
2
3,518
1,647
(825)
193
(23)
992
2,053
1,784
6
32,957
5,404
(514)
271
243
5,404
27,553
Increase (decrease) in net interest income
$
25,027
$
2,526
$
Provision for Loan Losses
Our provision for loan losses is a charge to income in order to bring our allowance for loan losses to a level deemed
appropriate by management. For a description of the factors taken into account by management in determining the allowance for
loan losses see “—Financial Condition—Allowance for Loan Losses.” The provision for loan losses was $5.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2017, compared to $2.1 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $3.0 million, or 149.5%. The
increase in provision expense was primarily due to the general provision required for purchased Sovereign loans that were refinanced
and re-underwritten at maturity as well as an increase in organic loan growth. Once an acquired loan undergoes new underwriting
and meets the criteria for a new loan, any remaining fair value adjustments are taken into interest income and the loan becomes
fully subject to our allowance for loan loss methodology. In addition, net charge-offs increased $532 thousand for the year ended
December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
Noninterest Income
Our primary sources of recurring noninterest income are service charges and fees on deposit accounts, loan fees, gain on
the sale of investment securities, gain on the sale of loans and other assets owned and rental income. Noninterest income does not
include loan origination fees to the extent they exceed the direct loan origination costs, which are generally recognized over the
life of the related loan as an adjustment to yield using the interest method.
50
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of noninterest income:
For the
Year Ended
December 31,
2017
2016
(Dollars in thousands)
Increase
(Decrease)
Noninterest income:
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts
$
2,502
$
1,846
$
Loan fees
Gain on sales of investment securities
Gain on sales of loans and other assets owned
Rental income
Other
Total noninterest income
657
222
3,141
139
915
320
15
3,288
—
1,034
$
7,576
$
6,503
$
656
337
207
(147)
139
(119)
1,073
Noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $1.1 million, or 16.5%, to $7.6 million compared
to noninterest income of $6.5 million for the same period in 2016. The primary components of the increase were as follows:
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts. We earn service charges and fees from our customers for deposit-related
activities. The income from these deposit activities constitutes a significant and predictable component of our noninterest income.
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts were $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $656
thousand, or 35.5%, over the same period in 2016. This increase was primarily attributable to organic growth in the number of
deposit accounts and accounts assumed from the Sovereign and Liberty acquisitions.
Loan fees. Loan fees increased $337 thousand, or 105.3%, to $657 thousand in the year ended December 31, 2017 as
compared to the same period in 2016. This increase was primarily attributable to organic growth in loans and as the result of the
acquisitions of Sovereign and Liberty.
Gain on sales of investment securities. Gain on sales of investment securities were $222 thousand for the year ended
December 31, 2017 compared to $15 thousand for the same period in 2016. The increase of $207 thousand primarily resulted from
the sale of $190 thousand Sovereign investment securities during the third quarter of 2017 that did not fit our investment strategy.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense is composed of all employee expenses and costs associated with operating our facilities, acquiring
and retaining customer relationships and providing bank services. The major component of noninterest expense is salaries and
employee benefits. Noninterest expense also includes operational expenses such as occupancy expenses, depreciation and
amortization of office equipment, professional fees and regulatory fees, including FDIC assessments, data processing expenses,
and advertising and promotion expenses.
51
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits
Non-staff expenses:
Occupancy and equipment
Professional and regulatory fees
Data processing and software expense
FDIC assessment fees
Marketing
Amortization of intangibles
Telephone and communications
Merger and acquisition expense
Other
Total noninterest expense
For the Year Ended
December 31,
2017
2016
(Dollars in thousands)
Increase
(Decrease)
$
20,828
$
14,332
$
6,496
5,618
2,981
2,217
1,177
1,293
964
720
2,691
4,300
3,667
2,804
1,158
661
983
380
402
—
2,003
$
42,789
$
26,390
$
1,951
177
1,059
516
310
584
318
2,691
2,297
16,399
Noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $16.4 million, or 62.1%, to $42.8 million, compared
to noninterest expense of $26.4 million for the same period in 2016. The most significant components of the increase were as
follows:
Salaries and employee benefits. Salaries and employee benefits include payroll expenses, the cost of incentive
compensation, benefit plans, health insurance and payroll taxes. The level of employee expense is impacted by the amount of
direct loan origination costs which are required to be deferred in accordance with ASC 310-20 (formerly FAS91). Salaries and
employee benefits were $20.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $6.5 million, or 45.3%, compared to
the same period in 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to increased employee compensation of $5.9 million resulting
from higher a headcount, including the addition of full-time equivalent employees related to the Sovereign and Liberty acquisitions,
and merit increases given to employees during the year ended December 31, 2017. Incentive costs also increased $1.9 million,
which primarily included lender incentive increases of $573 thousand as a result of organic loan growth during the period and
employee stock compensation increases of $711 thousand. Employee benefits and payroll taxes also increased $391 thousand and
$522 thousand, respectively, compared to the same period in 2016. These increases in salaries and employee benefits were partially
offset by direct loan origination costs previously mentioned in this paragraph, which increased $2.2 million as a result of the
growth in loans during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
Occupancy and equipment. Occupancy and equipment expense includes lease expense, building depreciation and related
facilities costs as well as furniture, fixture and equipment depreciation, small equipment purchases and maintenance expense. Our
expense associated with occupancy and equipment was $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $3.7
million for the same period in 2016. The increase of $1.9 million, or 53.2%, was primarily due to the leasing of additional office
space beginning June 1, 2016 at our corporate headquarters, additional lease expense associated with the opening of our Turtle
Creek branch beginning in January 2017, the addition of eight owned buildings and eight property leases from our acquisitions
of Sovereign and Liberty in 2017, and one month of depreciation associated with the purchase of our corporate headquarter building
in December 2017.
Data and processing expense. Data and processing expense includes software expense and data processing expense. Our
expense associated with data and processing was $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $1.2 million
for the same period in 2016. The increase of $1.0 million, or 91.5%, was primarily due to the data conversion processes during
the acquisitions of Sovereign and Liberty during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Merger and acquisition expense. Merger and acquisition expense includes legal, professional, audit, regulatory and other
expenses incurred in connection with a merger or acquisition. Merger and acquisition expense was $2.7 million for the year ended
52
December 31, 2017, an increase of $2.7 million, or 100.0%, compared to the same period in 2016. This increase was the result of
legal and other professional services associated with the Sovereign and Liberty acquisitions.
Other. This category includes operating and administrative expenses, including loan operations and collections, supplies
and printing, online and card interchange expense, ATM/debit card processing, postage and delivery, BOLI mortality expense,
insurance and security expenses. Other noninterest expense increased $2.3 million, or 114.7%, to$4.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2017, compared to $2.0 million for the same period in 2016, primarily related to an increase in loan and collection
expense of $652 thousand resulting from an increase in loan originations and renewals during 2017. Additionally, insurance
expenses increased $293 thousand, ATM and interchange expenses increased $247 thousand, dues and memberships increased
$225 thousand, supplies and printing expenses increased $123 thousand, automobile and travel expense increased $116 thousand,
and postage and delivery expense increased $65 thousand, primarily as result of the Sovereign and Liberty acquisitions.
Income tax expense
The amount of income tax expense is a function of our pre-tax income, tax-exempt income and other nondeductible
expenses. Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect current statutory income tax rates in effect for the period in which the deferred
tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. As of December 31, 2017, the Company did not believe a valuation
allowance was necessary.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, income tax expense totaled $13.0 million, an increase of $6.6 million, or 101.5%,
compared to $6.5 million for the same period in 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to the $9.2 million increase in net
operating income from $19.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $28.2 million for the same period in 2017 as well
as a $3.1 million income tax expense adjustment to the Company's deferred tax asset related to the enactment of the Tax Act in
December 2017. Based on the information available and current interpretation of the rules, the Company made reasonable estimates
of the impact of the reduction in the corporate tax rate and re-measured certain deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rate
at which they were expected to reverse in the future.
Financial Condition
Our total assets were $3.2 billion and $2.9 billion as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Assets increased
$263.0 million, or 8.9%, from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018. Our asset growth was due to the successful execution
of our strategy to establish deep relationships in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and the Houston metropolitan area. We believe
these relationships will bring in new customer accounts and grow balances from existing loan and deposit customers.
Loan Portfolio
Our primary source of income is interest on loans to individuals, professionals, small to medium-sized businesses and
commercial companies located in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and Houston metropolitan area. Our loan portfolio consists
primarily of commercial loans and real estate loans secured by commercial real estate properties located in our primary market
areas. Our loan portfolio represents the highest yielding component of our interest-earning asset base.
As of December 31, 2018, total loans were $2.6 billion, an increase of $322.0 million, or 14.4%, compared to $2.2 billion
as of December 31, 2017. This increase was primarily due to organic growth in new originations from the addition of experienced
commercial bankers and our continued penetration in our primary market areas. In addition, loans classified as held for sale, were
$1.3 million and $841 thousand as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Total loans as a percentage of deposits were 97.4% and 94.5% as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017,
respectively. Total loans as a percentage of assets were 79.6% and 78.9% as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017,
respectively.
53
The following table summarizes our loan portfolio by type of loan as of the dates indicated:
As of December 31,
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
$ 760,772
29.8% $
684,551
30.6% $ 291,416
29.4% $ 246,124
30.0% $ 207,101
34.3%
Commercial
Real estate:
Construction and land
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
324,863
10,528
297,917
51,285
Commercial real estate
1,103,032
Consumer
7,112
12.7
0.4
11.7
2.0
43.2
0.3
277,825
9,385
251,665
91,152
909,292
9,648
12.4
0.4
11.3
4.1
40.7
0.4
162,614
8,262
140,137
14,683
370,696
4,089
16.4
0.8
14.1
1.5
37.4
0.4
126,422
11,696
137,704
8,695
284,622
5,304
15.4
1.4
16.8
1.1
34.7
0.6
69,966
10,528
105,788
9,964
195,839
4,124
11.6
1.7
17.5
1.7
32.5
0.7
Total loans held for investment $ 2,555,509
100% $ 2,233,518
100% $ 991,897
100% $ 820,567
100% $ 603,310
100%
Total loans held for sale
$
1,258
$
841
$
5,208
$
2,831
$
8,858
Commercial. Our commercial loans are underwritten after evaluating and understanding the borrower’s ability to operate
profitably and effectively. These loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flows of the borrower, and secondarily, on
the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. Most commercial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other
business assets, such as accounts receivable or inventory, and generally include personal guarantees.
Commercial loans increased $76.2 million, or 11.1%, to $760.8 million as of December 31, 2018 from $684.6 million
as of December 31, 2017. The increase was due to growth in origination volumes in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex.
Construction and land. Our construction and land development loans consist of loans to fund construction, land acquisition
and land development construction. The properties securing the portfolio are primarily located throughout north Texas and are
generally diverse in terms of type.
Construction and land loans increased $47.0 million, or 16.9%, to $324.9 million as of December 31, 2018 from $277.8
million as of December 31, 2017. This increase was due to a robust business environment in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and
the Houston metropolitan area.
1-4 family residential. Our 1-4 family residential loans consist of loans secured by single family homes, which are both
owner-occupied and investor owned. Our 1-4 family residential loans have a relatively small balance spread between many
individual borrowers.
1-4 family residential loans increased $61.4 million, or 25.9%, to $297.9 million as of December 31, 2018 from $236.5
million as of December 31, 2017. This increase is a result of strong housing demand in our primary market areas.
Commercial Real Estate. Our commercial real estate loans are underwritten primarily based on projected cash flows
and, secondarily, as loans secured by real estate. These loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate
markets or in the general economy. The properties securing the portfolio are located throughout north Texas and are generally
diverse in terms of type. This diversity helps reduce the exposure to adverse economic events that affect any single industry.
Commercial real estate loans increased $193.7 million, or 21.3%, to $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2018 from $909.3
million as of December 31, 2017. The increase is due to continued demand within our primary market areas.
Other loan categories. Other categories of loans in our loan portfolio include farmland and agricultural loans made to
farmers and ranchers relating to their operations, multi-family residential loans and consumer loans. None of these categories of
loans represents a significant portion of our total loan portfolio.
54
The contractual maturity ranges of loans in our loan portfolio and the amount of such loans with fixed and floating interest
rates in each maturity range as of date indicated are summarized in the following tables:
As of December 31, 2018
One Year
One Through
After
or Less
Five Years
Five Years
Total
Commercial
Real estate:
Construction and land
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
Commercial real estate
Consumer
Total loans
Amounts with fixed rates
Amounts with floating rates
Commercial
Real estate:
Construction and land
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
Commercial real estate
Consumer
Total loans
Amounts with fixed rates
Amounts with floating rates
Nonperforming Assets
$
276,149
$
(Dollars in thousands)
400,883
$
83,740
$
760,772
118,233
1,479
18,175
14,885
147,084
1,653
577,658
177,795
399,863
$
$
$
194,467
8,964
66,408
34,281
630,995
4,807
$
$
$
1,340,805
600,180
740,625
$
$
$
12,163
85
213,334
2,119
324,953
652
637,046
209,820
427,226
$
$
$
324,863
10,528
297,917
51,285
1,103,032
7,112
2,555,509
987,795
1,567,714
As of December 31, 2017
One Year
One Through
After
or Less
Five Years
Five Years
Total
$
309,400
$
(Dollars in thousands)
296,078
$
79,073
156,681
1,596
23,327
59,289
146,159
2,430
698,882
196,492
502,390
$
$
$
105,943
7,695
65,562
27,155
560,715
6,403
$
$
$
1,069,551
478,764
590,787
$
$
$
15,201
94
162,776
4,708
202,418
815
465,085
126,149
338,936
$
684,551
277,825
9,385
251,665
91,152
909,292
9,648
$
$
$
2,233,518
801,405
1,432,113
Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such
payments were due. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet
payment obligations as they become due, as well as when required by regulatory provisions. Loans may be placed on non-accrual
status regardless of whether such loans are considered past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest
is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received in excess of principal due.
Loans are returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future
payments are reasonably assured.
We have several procedures in place to assist us in maintaining the overall quality of our loan portfolio. We have established
underwriting guidelines to be followed by our bankers, and we also monitor our delinquency levels for any negative or adverse
trends. Nevertheless, our loan portfolio could become subject to increasing pressures from deteriorating borrower credit due to
general economic conditions.
55
We believe our conservative lending approach and focused management of nonperforming assets, which consist of non-
accrual loans, accruing loans 90 or more days past due excluding PCI loans and other real estate owned, has resulted in sound
asset quality and timely resolution of problem assets. We had $24.7 million in nonperforming assets as of December 31, 2018
compared to $932 thousand in nonperforming assets as of December 31, 2017. We had $24.7 million in nonperforming loans as
of December 31, 2018 compared to $483 thousand as of December 31, 2017. The increase of $23.8 million in nonperforming
assets compared to December 31, 2017 was primarily due to the placement of $17.2 million of PCI loans on non-accrual status
as a result of information the Company obtained, that precluded the Company from reasonably estimating the timing and amount
of future cash flows relating to these loans. Excluding these purchased credit impaired loans compared to December 31, 2017, the
increase of $7.0 million in nonperforming assets was a result of an increase in nonperforming loans of $7.1 million, partially offset
by a decrease in other real estate owned of $449 thousand.
The following table presents information regarding nonperforming loans at the dates indicated:
As of December 31,
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Non-accrual loans(1)
Accruing loans 90 or more days past due
Total nonperforming loans
Other real estate owned:
Commercial real estate, construction, land and land
development
Residential real estate
Total other assets owned
Total nonperforming assets
Restructured loans—non-accrual
Restructured loans—accruing
Ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets
$ 24,745
$
—
24,745
—
—
—
$
$
$
$ 24,745
$
$
227
944
0.97%
0.77%
(Dollars in thousands)
$
941
$
465
18
483
449
—
449
932
15
603
835
1,776
493
169
662
2,438
170
652
$
$
$
$
$
$
591
84
675
493
—
493
1,168
288
1,439
0.02%
0.03%
0.18%
0.17%
0.08%
0.11%
$
$
$
$
436
—
436
55
50
105
541
597
1,080
0.07%
0.07%
(1) At December 31, 2018, non-accrual loans included PCI loans of $16,902 for which discount accretion has been suspended because the extent and timing of
cash flows from these PCI loans can no longer be reasonable estimated. There were no PCI loans classified as non-accrual at December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015 or
2014.
The following table presents non-accrual loans by category at the dates indicated:
Real estate:
Construction and land
1 - 4 family residential
Nonfarm residential
Commercial
Consumer
Total
As of December 31,
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
(Dollars in thousands)
$
2,399
$
— $
— $
— $
—
2,575
19,769
2
—
61
398
6
—
—
930
11
187
—
383
21
$
24,745
$
465
$
941
$
591
$
—
—
375
34
27
436
56
Potential Problem Loans
From a credit risk standpoint, we classify loans in one of four categories: pass, special mention, substandard or doubtful.
Loans classified as loss are charged-off. Loans not rated special mention, substandard, doubtful, or loss are classified as pass loans.
The classifications of loans reflect a judgment about the risks of default and loss associated with the loan. We review the ratings
on credits monthly. Ratings are adjusted to reflect the degree of risk and loss that is felt to be inherent in each credit as of each
monthly reporting period. All classified credits are evaluated for impairments. If impairment is determined to exist, a specific
reserve is established. Our methodology is structured so that specific allocations are increased in accordance with deterioration
in credit quality (and a corresponding increase in risk and loss) or decreased in accordance with improvement in credit quality
(and a corresponding decrease in risk and loss).
Credits rated special mention show clear signs of financial weaknesses or deterioration in credit worthiness, however,
such concerns are not so pronounced that we generally expect to experience significant loss within the short-term. Such credits
typically maintain the ability to perform within standard credit terms and credit exposure is not as prominent as credits with a
lower rating.
Credits rated substandard are those in which the normal repayment of principal and interest may be, or has been, jeopardized
by reason of adverse trends or developments of a financial, managerial, economic or political nature, or important weaknesses
which exist in collateral. A protracted workout on these credits is a distinct possibility. Prompt corrective action is therefore required
to strengthen our position, and/or to reduce exposure and to assure that adequate remedial measures are taken by the borrower.
Credit exposure becomes more likely in such credits and a serious evaluation of the secondary support to the credit is performed.
Credits rated doubtful are those in which full collection of principal appears highly questionable, and in which some
degree of loss is anticipated, even though the ultimate amount of loss may not yet be certain and/or other factors exist which could
affect collection of debt. Based upon available information, positive action by the Company is required to avert or minimize loss.
Credits rated doubtful are generally also placed on non-accrual.
Credits classified as PCI are those that, at acquisition date, had the characteristics of substandard loans and it was
probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required principal and interest payments would not be collected. The Company
evaluates these loans on a projected cash flow basis with this evaluation performed quarterly.
The following table summarizes our internal loan ratings, including PCI loans, as of the dates indicated.
Real estate:
Construction and land
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial
Consumer
Total
As of December 31, 2018
Special
Pass
Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
PCI
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
$ 320,987
$
1,860
$
2,016
$
— $
— $ 324,863
10,528
296,870
51,285
1,065,982
720,583
6,950
—
236
—
7,056
8,900
—
—
726
—
12,986
7,552
162
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
85
—
17,008
23,737
—
10,528
297,917
51,285
1,103,032
760,772
7,112
$ 2,473,185
$
18,052
$
23,442
$
— $
40,830
$ 2,555,509
57
As of December 31, 2017
Special
Pass
Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
PCI
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate:
Construction and land
$ 277,186
$
639
$
— $
— $
— $ 277,825
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial
Consumer
Total
Allowance for Loan Losses
9,336
235,781
106,275
882,523
634,796
9,540
—
462
—
8,771
18,337
—
—
200
—
681
1,155
108
—
—
—
—
116
—
49
99
—
17,317
30,147
—
9,385
236,542
106,275
909,292
684,551
9,648
$ 2,155,437
$
28,209
$
2,144
$
116
$
47,612
$ 2,233,518
We maintain an allowance for loan losses that represents management’s best estimate of the loan losses and risks inherent
in the loan portfolio. In determining the allowance for loan losses, we estimate losses on specific loans, or groups of loans, where
the probable loss can be identified and reasonably determined. The balance of the allowance for loan losses is based on internally
assigned risk classifications of loans, historical loan loss rates, changes in the nature of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality,
industry concentrations, delinquency trends, current economic factors and the estimated impact of current economic conditions
on certain historical loan loss rates. For additional discussion of our methodology, please refer to “—Critical Accounting Policies
—Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses.”
In connection with our review of the loan portfolio, we consider risk elements attributable to particular loan types or
categories in assessing the quality of individual loans. Some of the risk elements we consider include:
•
•
•
•
for commercial and industrial loans, the operating results of the commercial, industrial or professional enterprise,
the borrower’s business, professional and financial ability and expertise, the specific risks and volatility of income
and operating results typical for businesses in that category and the value, nature and marketability of collateral;
for commercial mortgage loans and multifamily residential loans, the debt service coverage ratio (income from the
property in excess of operating expenses compared to loan payment requirements), operating results of the owner
in the case of owner occupied properties, the loan to value ratio, the age and condition of the collateral and the
volatility of income, property value and future operating results typical of properties of that type;
for 1-4 family residential mortgage loans, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan, including a consideration of the
debt to income ratio and employment and income stability, the loan to value ratio, and the age, condition and
marketability of the collateral; and
for construction, land development and other land loans, the perceived feasibility of the project, including the ability
to sell developed lots or improvements constructed for resale or the ability to lease property constructed for lease,
the quality and nature of contracts for presale or prelease, if any, experience and ability of the developer and loan to
value ratio.
As of December 31, 2018, the allowance for loan losses totaled $19.3 million, or 0.75%, of total loans. As of December 31,
2017, the allowance for loan losses totaled $12.8 million, or 0.57%, of total loans. The increase in the percentage of allowance of
loan losses to total loans compared to December 31, 2017 was driven by our continued organic loan growth.
58
The following table presents, as of and for the periods indicated, an analysis of the allowance for loan losses and other
related data:
Average loans outstanding(1)
Gross loans outstanding at end of period(1)
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
$ 2,382,946
2017
$ 1,441,295
2016
$ 919,387
2015
$ 694,305
2014
$ 546,041
$ 2,555,509
$ 2,233,518
$ 991,897
$ 820,567
$ 603,310
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
$
12,808
$
Provision for loan losses
6,603
$
8,524
5,114
6,772
2,050
$
5,981
$
868
5,018
1,423
Charge-offs:
Real estate:
Construction, land and farmland
Residential
Nonfarm non-residential
Commercial
Consumer
Total charge-offs
Recoveries:
Real estate:
Construction, land and farmland
Residential
Nonfarm non-residential
Commercial
Consumer
Total recoveries
Net charge-offs
Allowance for loan losses at end of period
$
Ratio of allowance to end of period loans
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans
(1)
Excluding loans held for sale and deferred loan fees.
—
—
—
(175)
(22)
(197)
—
—
—
41
—
—
(11)
—
(828)
—
(839)
—
—
—
9
—
—
—
—
(314)
(19)
(333)
—
—
—
32
3
(48)
—
—
(87)
(5)
(140)
—
—
5
57
1
(28)
(30)
—
(448)
(4)
(510)
—
—
2
46
2
41
(156)
19,255
0.75%
0.01%
$
9
(830)
12,808
0.57%
0.06%
$
35
(298)
8,524
0.86%
0.03%
$
63
(77)
6,772
0.83%
0.01%
$
50
(460)
5,981
0.99%
0.08%
We believe the successful execution of our growth strategy through key acquisitions and organic growth is demonstrated
by the upward trend in loan balances from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2018. Loan balances increased from $603.3 million
as of December 31, 2014, to $2.6 billion as of December 31, 2018. Our allowance for loan losses has increased alongside the
growth in our loan portfolio during the same period despite having no reserves on acquired loans. Further, net charge-offs have
been immaterial, representing less than 0.10% of average loan balances from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2018.
Although we believe that we have established our allowance for loan losses in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and that the allowance for loan losses was adequate to provide for known and
inherent losses in the portfolio at all times shown above, future provisions will be subject to ongoing evaluations of the risks in
our loan portfolio. If we experience economic declines or if asset quality deteriorates, material additional provisions could be
required.
59
The following table shows the allocation of the allowance for loan losses among our loan categories and certain other
information as of the dates indicated. The allocation of the allowance for loan losses as shown in the table should neither be
interpreted as an indication of future charge-offs, nor as an indication that charge-offs in future periods will necessarily occur in
these amounts or in the indicated proportions. The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any loan category.
As of December 31,
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Amount
to Total
Amount
to Total
Amount
to Total
Amount
to Total
Amount
to Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate:
Construction and land
$
2,186
11.4% $
1,269
9.9% $
1,346
15.8% $
1,007
14.9% $
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
Commercial Real Estate
58
1,613
362
0.3
8.4
1.9
46
1,192
281
0.4
9.3
2.2
69
999
117
0.8
12
1.4
6,463
33.6
4,410
34.4
3,003
35.2
97
1,058
66
2,189
1.4
16.0
1.0
32.3
675
94
1,077
89
1,890
11.3%
0.016
18.0
1.5
31.6
Total real estate
Commercial
Consumer
Total allowance for loan
losses
Securities
$ 10,682
55.6% $
7,198
56.2% $
5,534
64.9% $
4,417
65.2% $
3,825
64.0%
8,554
19
44.3
0.1
5,588
22
43.6
0.2
2,955
35
34.7
0.4
2,324
31
34.3
0.5
2,092
64
34.9
1.1
$ 19,255
100% $ 12,808
100% $
8,524
100% $
6,772
100% $
5,981
100%
We use our securities portfolio to provide a source of liquidity, provide an appropriate return on funds invested, manage
interest rate risk, meet collateral requirements and meet regulatory capital requirements. As of December 31, 2018, the carrying
amount of investment securities totaled $262.7 million, an increase of $34.6 million, or 15.2%, compared to $228.1 million as of
December 31, 2017. The increases in our investment securities in 2018 were funded primarily from increases in deposits. Securities
represented 8.2% and 7.7% of total assets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Our investment portfolio consists entirely of securities classified as available for sale. As a result, the carrying values of
our investment securities are adjusted for unrealized gain or loss, and any gain or loss is reported on an after-tax basis as a component
of other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The following table summarizes the amortized cost and estimated fair
value of our investment securities as of the dates shown:
U.S. government agencies
Corporate bonds
Municipal securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Asset-backed securities
Total
As of December 31, 2018
Gross
Gross
Amortized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Cost
Gains
Losses
Fair Value
$
9,096
$
(Dollars in thousands)
— $
26,518
40,275
97,117
92,906
492
84
10
101
197
—
$
118
134
338
2,167
1,344
—
8,978
26,468
39,947
95,051
91,759
492
$
266,404
$
392
$
4,101
$
262,695
60
U.S. government agencies
Corporate bonds
Municipal securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Asset-backed securities
Total
As of December 31, 2017
Gross
Gross
Amortized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Cost
Gains
Losses
Fair Value
$
10,829
$
9
$
(Dollars in thousands)
17,500
55,499
91,734
53,559
616
330
189
58
9
7
$
18
—
211
1,068
925
—
$
229,737
$
602
$
2,222
$
10,820
17,830
55,477
90,724
52,643
623
228,117
All of our mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are issued and/or guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored entities. We do not hold any Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac preferred stock,
corporate equity, collateralized debt obligations, collateralized loan obligations, structured investment vehicles, private label
collateralized mortgage obligations, subprime, Alt-A or second lien elements in our investment portfolio. As of December 31,
2018, our investment portfolio did not contain any securities that are directly backed by subprime or Alt-A mortgages.
Certain investment securities have a fair value less than their historical cost. Management evaluates securities for other-
than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic of market conditions warrant such
an evaluation. Management (i) does not have the intent to sell more than an insignificant amount of investment securities prior to
recovery and/or maturity, (ii) believes it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell these securities prior to
recovery and/or maturity and (iii) believes that the length of time and extent that fair value has been less than cost is not indicative
of recoverability. For those securities in an unrealized loss position, the unrealized losses are largely due to interest rate changes.
Management believes any unrealized loss in the Company’s securities at December 31, 2018 is temporary and no credit impairment
has been realized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company sold certain securities in January 2019 due
to a one-time rebalancing activity and recorded an insignificant loss.
The following table sets forth the fair value, maturities and approximated weighted average yield based on estimated
annual income divided by the average amortized cost of our securities portfolio as of the dates indicated. The contractual maturity
of a mortgage-backed security is the date at which the last underlying mortgage matures.
As of December 31, 2018
After One Year
After Five Years
Within
One Year
but Within
Five Years
but Within
Ten Years
After Ten Years
Total
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Total
Yield
U.S. government agencies
$
Corporate bonds
Municipal securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Asset-backed securities
—
—
2,965
319
69
—
—% $
8,708
2.44% $
270
2.06% $
(Dollars in thousands)
—
2.24
—
2.63
—
23,552
2,593
37,540
75,616
492
4.93
1.92
2.23
2.68
2.89
2,916
16,284
54,042
16,074
—
6.00
2.26
2.76
3.32
—
—
—
18,105
3,150
—
—
—% $
8,978
2.43%
—
3.04
3.16
—
—
26,468
39,947
95,051
91,759
492
5.05
2.59
2.56
2.79
2.89
Total
$
3,353
2.15% $ 148,501
2.11% $ 89,586
2.68% $ 21,255
3.06% $ 262,695
2.38%
61
As of December 31, 2017
After One Year
After Five Years
Within
One Year
but Within
Five Years
but Within
Ten Years
After Ten Years
Total
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Total
Yield
(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. government agencies
$
—
—% $ 10,509
2.46% $
311
2.05% $
Corporate bonds
Municipal securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Asset-backed securities
—
2.27
—
2.25
—
2,330
—
208
—
7,830
11,652
52,461
39,408
623
5.62
1.98
1.90
2.05
2.16
10,000
24,163
34,595
13,027
—
5.15
2.32
2.51
2.34
—
—
—
17,332
3,668
—
—
—% $ 10,820
2.45%
— $ 17,830
2.72
3.07
$ 55,477
$ 90,724
— $ 52,643
— $
623
5.36
2.37
2.18
2.12
2.16
Total
$
2,538
2.27% $ 122,483
1.88% $ 82,096
2.12% $ 21,000
2.78% $ 228,117
2.05%
The contractual maturity of mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations and asset-backed securities
is not a reliable indicator of their expected life because borrowers have the right to prepay their obligations at any time. Mortgage-
backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations and asset-backed securities are typically issued with stated principal amounts
and are backed by pools of mortgage loans and other loans with varying maturities. The term of the underlying mortgages and
loans may vary significantly due to the ability of a borrower to prepay amounts outstanding. Monthly pay downs on mortgage-
backed securities tend to cause the average life of the securities to be much different than the stated contractual maturity. During
a period of increasing interest rates, fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities do not tend to experience heavy prepayments of principal,
and consequently, the average life of this security will be lengthened. If interest rates begin to fall, prepayments may increase,
thereby shortening the estimated life of these securities. The weighted average life of our investment portfolio was 4.33 years with
an estimated effective duration of 3.19 years as of December 31, 2018. The average yield of the securities portfolio was 2.67%
during 2018 compared to 2.03% during 2017.
As of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we did not own securities of any one issuer other than U.S. government
agency securities, for which aggregate adjusted cost exceeded 10.0% of the consolidated stockholders’ equity as of such respective
dates.
Deposits
We offer a variety of deposit accounts having a wide range of interest rates and terms, including demand, savings, money
market and time accounts. We rely primarily on competitive pricing policies, convenient locations and personalized service to
attract and retain these deposits.
Total deposits as of December 31, 2018 were $2.6 billion, an increase of $343.8 million, or 15.1%, compared to $2.3
billion as of December 31, 2017, due primarily to increases of $172.9 million, $13.5 million and $217.7 million in money market
accounts, noninterest-bearing deposit accounts and certificates of deposit, respectively. Our deposit growth was primarily due to
our continued penetration in our primary market areas, the increase in commercial lending relationships for which we also seek
deposit balances and increases in our financial institution money market accounts.
Noninterest-bearing deposits as of December 31, 2018 were $626.3 million, compared to $612.8 million as of
December 31, 2017, an increase of $13.5 million, or 2.2%.
Money market accounts as of December 31, 2018 were $1.1 billion, compared to $960.1 million as of December 31,
2017, an increase of $172.9 million, or 18.0%.
Average deposits for the year ended December 31, 2018 were $1.9 billion, an increase of $602.5 million, or 46.5% over
the year average of $1.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017. The average rate paid on total interest-bearing deposits
increased this period from 1.03% for the year ended December 31, 2017 to 1.38% for the year ended December 31, 2018. The
increase in the average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits was due to the overall market condition, the introduction of our
correspondent banking division, an increase in the prime rate during 2018, and an increase in time deposits, which typically pay
a higher rate.
62
The following table presents the daily average balances and weighted average rates paid on deposits for the periods
indicated:
For Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
Average
Balance
Average
Rate
Average
Balance
Average
Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-bearing demand accounts
$ 152,092
0.21% $
98,177
0.20%
Savings accounts
Money market accounts
Certificates and other time deposits > $100,000
Certificates and other time deposits < $100,000
Total interest-bearing deposits
Noninterest-bearing demand accounts
Total deposits
37,282
1,087,812
313,076
294,965
1,885,227
621,613
0.13
1.58
2.83
0.30
1.45
87,565
690,225
230,143
44,923
1,151,033
425,124
0.10
0.98
1.08
0.79
0.86
$2,506,840
1.09% $1,576,157
0.63%
Our ratio of average noninterest-bearing deposits to average total deposits was 32.7% and 27.0% for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
Factors affecting the cost of funding of our interest-bearing assets include the volume of noninterest- and interest-bearing
deposits, changes in market interest rates (including increases in fed fund rates) and economic conditions in our target markets
and their impact on interest paid on our deposits, change in deposit mix, as well as the ongoing execution of our balance sheet
management strategy. Our cost of funds was 1.09% in 2018, 0.63% in 2017 and 0.50% in 2016. Average rates on interest-bearing
deposits were 1.45% in 2018, 0.86% in 2017 and 0.72% in 2016.
Borrowings
We utilize short-term and long-term borrowings to supplement deposits to fund our lending and investment activities,
each of which is discussed below.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances. The FHLB allows us to borrow on a blanket floating lien status collateralized by
certain securities and loans. As of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, total borrowing capacity of $1.0 billion, $721.6 million
and $369.4 million, respectively, was available under this arrangement and $28.0 million, $71.2 million and $38.3 million,
respectively, was outstanding, with an average interest rate of 1.95% as of December 31, 2018, 1.04% as of December 31, 2017
and 0.60% as of December 31, 2016. Our current FHLB advances mature within three years. We utilize these borrowings to meet
liquidity needs and to fund certain fixed rate loans in our portfolio.
63
The following table presents our FHLB borrowings at the dates indicated. Other than FHLB borrowings, we had no other
short-term borrowings at the dates indicated.
December 31, 2018
Amount outstanding at period end
Weighted average interest rate at period end
Maximum month-end balance during the period
Average balance outstanding during the period
Weighted average interest rate during the period
December 31, 2017
Amount outstanding at period end
Weighted average interest rate at period end
Maximum month-end balance during the period
Average balance outstanding during the period
Weighted average interest rate during the period
FHLB Advances
(Dollars in thousands)
$
$
$
$
28,019
2.36%
148,140
87,366
1.95%
71,164
1.36%
71,164
51,196
1.04%
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. The FRB has an available borrower in custody arrangement, which allows us to borrow
on a collateralized basis. Certain commercial and consumer loans are pledged under this arrangement. We maintain this borrowing
arrangement to meet liquidity needs pursuant to our contingency funding plan. As of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, $405.0
million, $338.6 million and $197.3 million, respectively, were available under this arrangement. As of December 31, 2018,
approximately $524.0 million in commercial loans were pledged as collateral. As of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, no
borrowings were outstanding under this arrangement.
Junior subordinated debentures. In a previous acquisition, the Company assumed $3.1 million in fixed/floating rate
junior subordinated debentures underlying common securities and preferred capital securities (the “Parkway Trust Securities”),
issued by Parkway National Capital Trust I (“Parkway Trust”), a statutory business trust and acquired wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Company. The Company became a guarantor and, as such, unconditionally guaranteed payment of accrued and unpaid
distributions required to be paid on the Parkway Trust Securities subject to certain exceptions, the redemption price when a capital
security is called for redemption and amounts due if the Parkway Trust is liquidated or terminated.
The Company owns all of the outstanding common securities of the Parkway Trust. The Parkway Trust used the proceeds
from the issuance of its Parkway Trust Securities to buy the debentures originally issued by Fidelity Resource Company. These
debentures are the Parkway Trust’s only assets and the interest payments from the debentures finance the distributions paid on the
Parkway Trust Securities.
The Parkway Trust Securities pay cumulative cash distributions quarterly at a rate per annum equal to the 3-month LIBOR
plus 1.85%. So long as no event of default leading to an acceleration event has occurred, the Company has the right at any time
and from time to time during the term of the debenture to defer payments of interest by extending the interest distribution period
for up to twenty consecutive quarterly periods. The effective rate as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 was 4.64% and 3.44%,
respectively. The Parkway Trust Securities are subject to mandatory redemption in whole or in part, upon repayment of the
debentures at the stated maturity in 2036 or their earlier redemption, in each case at a redemption price equal to the aggregate
liquidation preference of the Parkway Trust Securities plus any accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon to the date of
redemption. Prior redemption is permitted under certain circumstances.
In connection with the acquisition of Sovereign on August 1, 2017, the Company assumed $8.6 million in floating rate
junior subordinated debentures underlying common securities and preferred capital securities (the “SovDallas Trust Securities”),
issued by SovDallas Capital Trust I (“SovDallas Trust”), a statutory business trust and acquired wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company. The Company became a guarantor and, as such, unconditionally guaranteed payment of accrued and unpaid distributions
required to be paid on the SovDallas Trust Securities subject to certain exceptions, the redemption price when a capital security
is called for redemption and amounts due if the SovDallas Trust is liquidated or terminated. The Company also owns all of the
outstanding common securities of the SovDallas Trust.
64
The SovDallas Trust invested the total proceeds from the sale of the SovDallas Trust Securities and the investment in
common shares in floating rate junior subordinated debentures originally issued by Sovereign. Interest on the SovDallas Trust
Securities is payable quarterly at a rate equal to 3-month LIBOR plus 4.0%. Principal payments are due at maturity in July 2038.
The effective rate as of December 31, 2018 was 6.40%. The SovDallas Trust Securities are guaranteed by the Company and are
subject to redemption. The Company may redeem the debt securities, in whole or in part, at any time at an amount equal to the
principal amount of the debt securities being redeemed plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
The Parkway Trust Securities and SovDallas Trust Securities qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to regulatory limitations,
under guidelines established by the Federal Reserve.
Subordinated notes. During 2013, the Company issued subordinated promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount
of $5.0 million (“Notes”) in a private offering. The Notes were issued to certain entities controlled by an affiliate of the Company
and the proceeds were used to support the growth of the Company. The Notes are unsecured, with interest payable quarterly at a
fixed rate of 6.0% per annum, and unpaid principal and interest on the notes is due at the stated maturity on December 31, 2023.
The Notes qualify as Tier 2 Capital, subject to regulatory limitations, under guidelines established by the Federal Reserve. In
addition, we may redeem the Notes in whole or in part on any interest payment date that occurs on or after December 23, 2018,
subject to approval of the Federal Reserve in compliance with applicable statutes and regulations.
Under the terms of the Notes, if we have not paid interest on the Notes within 30 days of any interest payment date, or
if our classified assets to total tangible capital ratio exceeds 40.0%, then the noteholder that holds the greatest aggregate principal
amount of the Notes may appoint one representative to attend meetings of our board of directors as an observer. The board
observation rights terminate when such overdue interest is paid or our classified assets to total tangible capital ratio no longer
exceeds 40.0%. In addition, the terms of the Notes provide that the noteholders will have the same rights to inspect our books and
records provided to holders our common stock under Texas law.
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, we also issued warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock,
at an exercise price of $11.00 per share, exercisable at any time, in whole or in part, on or prior to December 31, 2023.
Junior subordinated debentures
Subordinated notes (1)
Total
As of December 31,
2018
2017
2016
$
$
11,702
4,989
16,691
$
$
11,702
4,987
16,689
$
$
3,093
4,934
8,027
(1) Excludes discount of $11, $13, and $15 and issuance costs of $30, $36, and $43 as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
Branch assets and liabilities held for sale
On October 23, 2017, we entered into a Purchase and Assumption Agreement to sell certain assets and liabilities associated
with two branch locations in the Austin metropolitan market. On January 1, 2018, we completed the sale of these assets and
liabilities to Horizon Bank, SSB. We determined that this transaction met the criteria for held for sale as of December 31, 2017,
with branch assets held for sale primarily comprised of $26.3 million in loans held for sale and branch liabilities primarily comprised
of $64.3 million in deposits held for sale. The completion of this sale resulted in our exiting the Austin market.
In the fourth quarter of 2017, we ceased using one of our Dallas, Texas branch buildings. The associated building and
improvements were included in branch assets held for sale as of December 31, 2017. On August 6, 2018, we completed the sale
of the branch location to Texas Trust Credit Union, resulting in a $1,747 cash settlement during the year ended December 31,
2018, which included the recognition of a loss of $6 on the sale reported in other non-interest expenses. For further information,
see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 25 – Branch Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale in the
accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report.
65
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Liquidity management involves our ability to raise funds to support asset growth and acquisitions or reduce assets to
meet deposit withdrawals and other payment obligations, to maintain reserve requirements and otherwise to operate on an ongoing
basis and manage unexpected events. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, our liquidity needs were primarily
met by core deposits, wholesale borrowings, proceeds from the sale of common stock in an underwritten public offering during
2017, security and loan maturities and prepaying balances in our investment and loan portfolios. Other sources of funds included
brokered deposits, purchased funds from correspondent banks and overnight advances from the FHLB and the FRB. We maintained
two lines of credit with commercial banks that provide for extensions of credit with an availability to borrow up to an aggregate
amount of $75 million as of December 31, 2018, $55 million as of December 31, 2017 and $14.6 million as of December 31,
2016. There were no advances under these lines of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
The following table illustrates, during the periods presented, the mix of our funding sources and the average assets in
which those funds are invested as a percentage of our average total assets for the period indicated. Average assets totaled $3.1
billion for the year ended December 31, 2018, $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017 and $1.2 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2016.
Sources of Funds:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing
Interest-bearing
Certificates and other time deposits
Advances from FHLB
Other borrowings
Other liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
Total
Uses of Funds:
Loans
Securities available for sale
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks
Other noninterest-earning assets
Total
Average noninterest-bearing deposits to average deposits
Average loans to average deposits
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2018
2017
2016
19.8%
21.5%
25.5%
40.8
19.4
2.8
0.5
0.4
16.3
100%
44.0
14.1
2.6
0.7
0.3
16.8
100%
42.6
15.4
3.7
0.7
0.2
12.0
100%
75.6%
72.3%
77.2%
7.9
—
16.5
100%
32.7%
124.7%
8.6
10.2
8.9
100%
27.0%
90.8%
7.1
7.8
7.9
100%
30.5%
92.5%
Our primary source of funds is deposits, and our primary use of funds is loans. We do not expect a change in the primary
source or use of our funds in the foreseeable future. Our average loans net of allowance for loan loss increased 65.4% for the year
ended December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 and 56.2% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to
the same period in 2016. We invest excess deposits in interest-bearing deposits at other banks, the Federal Reserve or liquid
investments securities until these monies are needed to fund loan growth.
As of December 31, 2018, we had $962.4 million in outstanding commitments to extend credit and $5.4 million in
commitments associated with outstanding standby and commercial letters of credit. As of December 31, 2017, we had outstanding
$606.5 million in commitments to extend credit and $9.3 million in commitments associated with outstanding standby and
commercial letters of credit. Since commitments associated with letters of credit and commitments to extend credit may expire
unused, the total outstanding may not necessarily reflect the actual future cash funding requirements.
66
As of December 31, 2018, we had cash and cash equivalents of $84.4 million, compared to $149.0 million at December 31,
2017.
Analysis of Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2018
2017
$
$
$
50,388
(400,010)
285,027
(64,595) $
26,662
(124,855)
12,446
(85,747)
For the year ended December 31, 2018, net cash provided by operating activities increased by $23.7 million from $26.7
million from $50.4 million. The increase in cash from operating activities was primarily related to a $24.2 million increase in net
income.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2018, net cash used in investing activities increased by $275.2 million compared to the
same period in 2017. The increase in cash used in investing activities was primarily attributable to a $119.0 million decrease in
securities available for sale resulting from our sale of securities acquired from Sovereign that did not fit our investment strategy
during the year ended December 31, 2017. No corresponding portfolio realignment occurred in 2018. In addition, the increase
was due to an increase of $115.3 million in net loans originated and a decrease of $42.1 million in proceeds from maturities, calls,
and paydowns on investment securities during the year ended December 31, 2018.
Cash Flows Provided in Financing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2018, net cash provided by financing activities increased by $272.6 million compared
to the same period in 2017. The increase in cash provided by financing activities was primarily attributable to a $326.0 million
increase in funding from deposits.
For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we had no exposure to future cash requirements associated with known
uncertainties or capital expenditures of a material nature.
Capital Resources
Total stockholders’ equity was $530.6 million as of December 31, 2018, compared to $488.9 million as of December 31,
2017, an increase of $41.7 million, or 8.5%. The increase from December 31, 2017 was primarily the result of $39.3 million in
net income.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, we did not declare or pay cash dividends. For the year ended December 31, 2017,
we paid cash dividends on preferred stock of $227 thousand which included $185 thousand of accrued dividends in connection
with our acquisition of Sovereign. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we did not declare or pay cash dividends as we redeemed
all 8,000 shares of SBLF Series C preferred stock on December 22, 2015. See Note 22 - Preferred Stock to our consolidated
financial statements included in Item 8 of this report. We did not purchase any of our common stock during the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
Capital management consists of providing equity to support our current and future operations. The Bank regulators view
capital levels as important indicators of an institution’s financial soundness. As a general matter, FDIC-insured depository
institutions and their holding companies are required to maintain minimum capital relative to the amount and types of assets they
hold. We are subject to regulatory capital requirements at the bank holding company and bank levels. See “Item 1. Business—
Regulation and Supervision—Prompt Corrective Action” for additional discussion regarding the regulatory capital requirements
applicable to us and the Bank. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, we and the Bank were in compliance with all applicable
67
regulatory capital requirements, and the Bank was classified as “well capitalized” for purposes of the prompt corrective action
regulations. As we employ our capital and continue to grow our operations, our regulatory capital levels may decrease depending
on our level of earnings. However, we expect to monitor and control our growth in order to remain in compliance with all regulatory
capital standards applicable to us.
The following table presents the actual capital amounts and regulatory capital ratios for us and the Bank as of the dates
indicated.
As of December 31,
As of December 31,
2018
2017
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
(Dollars in thousands)
$
$
394,419
370,175
358,473
370,175
353,640
334,385
334,385
334,385
12.98% $
12.18
11.80
12.04
11.64% $
11.01
11.01
10.87
342,521
324,726
313,024
324,726
296,207
283,399
283,399
283,399
13.16%
12.48
12.03
12.92
11.37%
10.88
10.88
11.28
Veritex Holdings, Inc.
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Veritex Community Bank
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Contractual Obligations
The following tables summarize our contractual obligations and other commitments to make future payments as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, which consist of our future cash payments associated with our contractual obligations pursuant to
our FHLB advances, non-cancelable future operating leases and qualified affordable housing investment. Future payments for
FHLB advances will include interest in addition to the principal amount of the advances in the table below that will be paid over
future periods. Payments related to leases are based on actual payments specified in underlying contracts. Advances from the
FHLB totaled approximately $28.0 million and $71.2 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of December 31,
2018, the advances are collateralized by a blanket floating lien on certain securities and loans, had a weighted average rate of
2.36% and mature on various dates during 2018 and 2022.
In 2017, we began investing in two qualified housing projects. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the balance of the
investment for qualified affordable housing projects was $3.7 million and $2.0 million, respectively. This balance is reflected in
non-marketable equity securities on our consolidated balance sheets. The total unfunded commitment related to the investment in
a qualified housing project totaled $2.5 million and $1.8 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. We expect to fulfill
these commitments during the year ending December 31, 2034.
68
As of December 31, 2018
More than
3 years or
1 year
or less
1 year but less
more but less
than 3 years
than 5 years
5 years
or more
Total
Non-cancelable future operating leases
$
1,913
$
(Dollars in thousands)
$
2,100
$
2,990
Time deposits
Advances from FHLB
Junior subordinated debentures
Subordinated debt
Qualified affordable housing agreement
576,466
25,000
—
—
1,303
100,463
—
—
—
954
6,055
3,019
—
—
43
1,794
$
8,797
—
—
11,702
4,989
145
682,984
28,019
11,702
4,989
2,445
Total
$
604,682
$
104,407
$
11,217
$
18,630
$
738,936
As of December 31, 2017
More than
3 years or
1 year
or less
1 year but less
more but less
than 3 years
than 5 years
5 years
or more
Total
Non-cancelable future operating leases
$
2,349
$
(Dollars in thousands)
$
1,580
$
3,918
Time deposits
Advances from FHLB
Junior subordinated debentures
Subordinated debt
Other borrowings
Qualified affordable housing agreement
413,269
68,000
—
—
15,000
794
48,296
3,748
—
—
—
—
897
—
—
—
—
22
2,134
$
9,981
—
3,164
11,702
4,987
—
52
465,313
71,164
11,702
4,987
15,000
1,765
Total
$
499,412
$
53,111
$
5,350
$
22,039
$
579,912
Off-Balance Sheet Items
In the normal course of business, we enter into various transactions which, in accordance with GAAP, are not included
in our consolidated balance sheets. However, the Company has only limited off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are
reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on the Company’s financial condition, revenues, expenses, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. The Company enters into these transactions to meet the financing
needs of our customers. These transactions include commitments to extend credit and standby and commercial letters of credit,
which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the
consolidated balance sheets.
Our commitments associated with outstanding standby and commercial letters of credit and commitments to extend credit
expiring by the period as of the date indicated are summarized below. Since commitments associated with letters of credit and
commitments to extend credit may expire unused, the amounts shown do not necessarily reflect the actual future cash funding
requirements.
69
As of December 31, 2018
More than
3 years or
1 year
or less
1 year but less
more but less
than 3 years
than 5 years
5 years
or more
Total
Standby and commercial letters of credit
Commitments to extend credit
Total
$
$
3,336
333,794
337,130
$
$
(Dollars in thousands)
— $
$
1,850
405,650
147,492
407,500
$
147,492
$
245
75,500
75,745
$
$
5,431
962,436
967,867
Standby and commercial letters of credit are written conditional commitments that the Company issues to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement
with the third party, the Company would be required to fund the commitment. The maximum potential amount of future payments
the Company could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount of the commitment. If the commitment is funded,
the customer is obligated to reimburse the Company for the amount paid under this standby letter of credit.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being fully drawn, the total commitment amounts
disclosed above do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Management evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness
on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if considered necessary by us, upon extension of credit, is based on
management’s credit evaluation of the borrower.
Impact of Inflation
Our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have
been prepared in accordance with GAAP. These require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of
historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative value of money over time due to inflation or recession.
Unlike many industrial companies, substantially all of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest
rates have a more significant impact on our performance than the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates may not
necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services. However, other operating
expenses do reflect general levels of inflation.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Our accounting and reporting policies conform to GAAP and the prevailing practices in the financial services industry.
However, we also evaluate our performance by reference to certain additional financial measures discussed in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K that we identify as being “non-GAAP financial measures.” In accordance with SEC rules, we classify a financial
measure as being a non-GAAP financial measure if that financial measure excludes or includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments
that have the effect of excluding or including amounts, that are included or excluded, as the case may be, in the most directly
comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP as in effect from time to time in the United States in our
statements of income, balance sheets or statements of cash flows. Non-GAAP financial measures do not include operating and
other statistical measures or ratios or statistical measures calculated using exclusively either financial measures calculated in
accordance with GAAP, operating measures or other measures that are not non-GAAP financial measures or both.
The non-GAAP financial measures that we discuss in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for the most directly comparable or other financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.
Moreover, the manner in which we calculate the non-GAAP financial measures that we discuss in this Annual Report on Form
10-K may differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names. You should understand how such other
banking organizations calculate their financial measures similar or with names similar to the non-GAAP financial measures we
have discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K when comparing such non-GAAP financial measures.
70
Tangible Book Value Per Common Share. Tangible book value is a non-GAAP measure generally used by financial
analysts and investment bankers to evaluate financial institutions. We calculate: (a) tangible common equity as total stockholders’
equity less goodwill and intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization; and (b) tangible book value per common share as
tangible common equity (as described in clause (a)) divided by number of common shares outstanding at the end of the relevant
period. The most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is our book value per common share.
We believe that this measure is important to many investors who are interested in changes from period to period in book
value per common share exclusive of changes in intangible assets. Goodwill and other intangible assets have the effect of increasing
total book value while not increasing our tangible book value.
The following table reconciles, as of the dates set forth below, total stockholders’ equity to tangible common equity and
presents our tangible book value per common share compared with our book value per common share:
Tangible Common Equity
Total stockholders' equity
Adjustments:
Goodwill
Intangible assets(1)
Tangible common equity
Common shares outstanding
Book value per common share
Tangible book value per common share
For the Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
$
$
$
$
530,638
$
488,929
$
239,088
$
132,046
$
113,312
(161,447)
(15,896)
(159,452)
(22,165)
(26,865)
(2,181)
(26,865)
(2,410)
353,295
$
307,312
$
210,042
$
102,771
$
24,254
24,110
15,195
10,712
21.88
14.57
$
$
20.28
12.75
$
$
15.73
13.82
$
$
12.33
9.59
$
$
(19,148)
(1,261)
92,903
9,471
11.96
9.81
(1) Intangible assets includes branch intangible assets held for sale of $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets. Tangible common equity to tangible assets is a non-GAAP measure
generally used by financial analysts and investment bankers to evaluate financial institutions. We calculate: (a) tangible common
equity as total stockholders’ equity, less goodwill and intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization; (b) tangible assets as
total assets less goodwill and intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization; and (c) tangible common equity to tangible assets
as tangible common equity (as described in clause (a)) divided by tangible assets (as described in clause (b)). The most directly
comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is total stockholders’ equity to total assets.
We believe that this measure is important to many investors who are interested in the relative changes from period to
period in common equity and total assets, in each case, exclusive of changes in intangible assets. Goodwill and other intangible
assets have the effect of increasing both total stockholders’ equity and assets while not increasing our tangible common equity or
tangible assets.
The following table reconciles, as of the dates set forth below, total stockholders’ equity to tangible common equity and
total assets to tangible assets and presents our tangible common equity to tangible assets:
71
Tangible Common Equity
Total stockholders' equity
Adjustments:
Goodwill
Intangible assets(1)
Tangible common equity
Tangible Assets
Total assets
Adjustments:
Goodwill
Intangible assets(1)
Tangible assets
For the Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
(Dollars in thousands)
$
$
$
530,538
$
488,929
$
239,088
$
132,046
$
113,312
(161,447)
(15,896)
353,195
3,208,550
(161,447)
(15,896)
$
$
(159,452)
(22,165)
307,312
2,945,583
(159,452)
(22,165)
$
$
(26,865)
(2,181)
210,042
1,408,507
(26,865)
(2,181)
$
$
(26,865)
(2,410)
102,771
1,039,551
(26,865)
(2,410)
$
$
(19,148)
(1,261)
92,903
802,231
(19,148)
(1,261)
$
3,031,207
$
2,763,966
$
1,379,461
$
1,010,276
$
781,822
Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets
11.65%
11.12%
15.23%
10.17%
11.88%
(1) Intangible assets includes branch intangible assets held for sale of $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and with general practices within the
financial services industry. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under current circumstances. These assumptions form the basis for our
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily available from independent, objective sources.
We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. Use of alternative assumptions may have resulted in significantly different estimates.
Actual results may differ from these estimates.
We have identified the following accounting policies and estimates that, due to the difficult, subjective or complex
judgments and assumptions inherent in those policies and estimates and the potential sensitivity of our financial statements to
those judgments and assumptions, are critical to an understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. We believe
that the judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our financial statements are appropriate.
Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
Management considers the policies related to the allowance for loan losses as the most critical to the financial statement
presentation. The total allowance for loan losses includes activity related to allowances calculated in accordance with ASC 310,
Receivables, and ASC 450, Contingencies. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged
to current earnings. The amount maintained in the allowance reflects management’s estimate of incurred losses in the loan portfolio
at the report date. The allowance for loan losses is comprised of specific reserves assigned to certain impaired loans and general
reserves. Factors contributing to the determination of specific reserves include the creditworthiness of the borrower, and more
specifically, changes in the expected future receipt of principal and interest payments and/or in the value of pledged collateral. A
reserve is recorded when the carrying amount of the loan exceeds the discounted estimated cash flows using the loan’s initial
effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral for certain collateral dependent loans. For purposes of establishing the
general reserve, we stratify the loan portfolio into homogeneous groups of loans that possess similar loss potential characteristics
and apply a loss ratio to these groups of loans to estimate the credit losses in the loan portfolio. We use both historical loss ratios
and qualitative loss factors assigned to major loan collateral types to establish general component loss allocations. Refer to “Loans
and Allowance for Loan Losses” in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report
for further discussion of the factors considered by management in establishing the allowance for loan loss.
Business Combinations
We apply the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. Under the acquisition method, the acquiring
entity in a business combination recognizes 100% of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair values.
We use valuation techniques appropriate for the asset or liability being measured in determining these fair values. Any excess of
the purchase price over amounts allocated to assets acquired, including identifiable intangible assets and liabilities assumed, is
72
recorded as goodwill. Where amounts allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed is greater than the purchase price, a
bargain purchase gain is recognized. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.
Investment Securities
Securities are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost when we have the positive intent and ability to
hold them until maturity. Securities to be held for indefinite periods of time are classified as available for sale and carried at fair
value, with the unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income, net of tax. We determine the appropriate
classification of securities at the time of purchase.
Interest income includes amortization of purchase premiums and discounts. Realized gains and losses are derived from
the amortized cost of the security sold. Credit related declines in the fair value of held to maturity and available for sale securities
below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses, with the remaining unrealized
loss recognized as a component of other comprehensive income. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, we
consider, among other things, (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial
condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and our ability to retain the investment in the issuer for a period
of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale consist of certain mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market and are
carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value on an individual loan basis. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through
a valuation allowance by charges to income. We obtain purchase commitments from secondary market investors prior to closing
the loans and do not retain the servicing obligations related to any such loans upon their sale. Gains and losses on sales of loans
held for sale are based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related loan sold.
Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking
statements are based on various facts and derived utilizing numerous important assumptions and are subject to known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different
from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements include the information concerning our future financial performance, business and growth strategy, projected plans
and objectives, as well as projections of macroeconomic and industry trends, which are inherently unreliable due to the multiple
factors that impact economic trends, and any such variations may be material. Statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise
include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “projects,” “estimates,” “plans” and similar expressions or future
or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” “may” and “could” are generally forward-looking in nature and not historical
facts, although not all forward-looking statements include the foregoing. You should understand that the following important
factors could affect our future results and cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking
statements:
• risks related to the concentration of our business in Texas, and specifically within the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and
the Houston metropolitan area, including risks associated with any downturn in the real estate sector and risks associated
with a decline in the values of single family homes in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and the Houston metropolitan
area;
• uncertain market conditions and economic trends nationally, regionally and particularly in the Dallas-Fort Worth
metroplex and Texas;
• changes in market interest rates that affect the pricing of our loans and deposits and our net interest income;
• risks related to our strategic focus on lending to small to medium-sized businesses;
• the sufficiency of the assumptions and estimates we make in establishing reserves for potential loan losses;
• our ability to implement our growth strategy, including identifying and consummating suitable acquisitions;
• risks related to the integration of Green and any other acquired businesses, including exposure to potential asset quality
and credit quality risks and unknown or contingent liabilities, the time and costs associated with integrating systems,
technology platforms, procedures and personnel, the need for additional capital to finance such transactions, and possible
failures in realizing the anticipated benefits from acquisitions;
• our ability to recruit and retain successful bankers that meet our expectations in terms of customer relationships and
profitability;
73
• our ability to retain executive officers and key employees and their customer and community relationships;
• risks associated with our limited operating history and the relatively unseasoned nature of a significant portion of our
loan portfolio;
• risks associated with our commercial real estate and construction loan portfolios, including the risks inherent in the
valuation of the collateral securing such loans;
• risks associated with our commercial loan portfolio, including the risk of deterioration in value of the general business
assets that generally secure such loans;
• potential changes in the prices, values and sales volumes of commercial and residential real estate securing our real
estate loans;
• risks related to the significant amount of credit that we have extended to a limited number of borrowers and in a limited
geographic area;
• our ability to maintain adequate liquidity and to raise necessary capital to fund our acquisition strategy and operations
or to meet increased minimum regulatory capital levels;
• potential fluctuations in the market value and liquidity of our investment securities;
• the effects of competition from a wide variety of local, regional, national and other providers of financial, investment
and insurance services;
• our ability to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial
reporting;
• the fact that we are no longer an “emerging growth company” and as a result we have increased disclosure obligations;
• risks associated with fraudulent and negligent acts by our customers, employees or vendors;
• our ability to keep pace with technological change or difficulties when implementing new technologies;
• risks associated with difficulties and/or terminations with third-party service providers and the services they
provide;
• risks associated with unauthorized access, cyber-crime and other threats to data security;
• potential impairment on the goodwill we have recorded or may record in connection with business acquisitions;
• our ability to comply with various governmental and regulatory requirements applicable to financial institutions;
• the impact of recent and future legislative and regulatory changes, including changes in banking, securities and tax
laws and regulations and their application by our regulators, such as the Dodd-Frank Act;
• governmental monetary and fiscal policies, including the policies of the Federal Reserve;
• our ability to comply with supervisory actions by federal and state banking agencies;
• changes in the scope and cost of FDIC, insurance and other coverage; and
• systemic risks associated with the soundness of other financial institutions
74
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk
As a financial institution, our primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility. Our asset, liability and funds
management policy provides management with the guidelines for effective funds management, and we have established a
measurement system for monitoring our net interest rate sensitivity position. We manage our sensitivity position within our
established guidelines.
Fluctuations in interest rates will ultimately impact both the level of income and expense recorded on most of our assets
and liabilities, and the market value of all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, other than those which have a
short term to maturity. Interest rate risk is the potential of economic losses due to future interest rate changes. These economic
losses can be reflected as a loss of future net interest income and/or a loss of current fair market values. The objective is to measure
the effect on net interest income and to adjust the balance sheet to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time maximizing
income.
We manage our exposure to interest rates by structuring our balance sheet in the ordinary course of business. We do not
enter into instruments such as leveraged derivatives, interest rate swaps, financial options, financial future contracts or forward
delivery contracts for the purpose of reducing interest rate risk. Based upon the nature of our operations, we are not subject to
foreign exchange or commodity price risk. We do not own any trading assets.
Our exposure to interest rate risk is managed by the Asset-Liability Committee of the Bank in accordance with policies
approved by its board of directors. The committee formulates strategies based on appropriate levels of interest rate risk. In
determining the appropriate level of interest rate risk, the committee considers the impact on earnings and capital of the current
outlook on interest rates, potential changes in interest rates, regional economies, liquidity, business strategies and other factors.
The committee meets regularly to review, among other things, the sensitivity of assets and liabilities to interest rate changes, the
book and market values of assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses, purchase and sale activities, commitments to originate
loans and the maturities of investments and borrowings. Additionally, the committee reviews liquidity, cash flow flexibility,
maturities of deposits and consumer and commercial deposit activity. Management employs methodologies to manage interest
rate risk, which include an analysis of relationships between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and an interest
rate shock simulation model.
We use an interest rate risk simulation model and shock analysis to test the interest rate sensitivity of net interest income
and the balance sheet, respectively. Contractual maturities and repricing opportunities of loans are incorporated in the model as
are prepayment assumptions, maturity data and call options within the investment portfolio.
We utilize static balance sheet rate shocks to estimate the potential impact on net interest income of changes in interest
rates under various rate scenarios. This analysis estimates a percentage of change in the metric from the stable rate base scenario
versus alternative scenarios of rising and falling market interest rates by instantaneously shocking a static balance sheet. Internal
policy regarding internal rate risk simulations currently specifies that for instantaneous parallel shifts of the yield curve, estimated
net income at risk for the subsequent one-year period should not decline by more than 6.0% for a 100 basis point shift, 12.0% for
a 200 basis point shift, and 18.0% for a 300 basis point shift.
75
The following table summarizes the simulated change in net interest income and fair value of equity over a 12-month
horizon as of the dates indicated:
Change in Interest
Rates (Basis Points)
+300
+200
+100
Base
-100
As of December 31, 2018
As of December 31, 2017
Percent Change
Percent Change
Percent Change
Percent Change
in Net Interest
in Fair Value
in Net Interest
in Fair Value
Income
of Equity
Income
of Equity
8.30 %
5.76
3.00
0.05
(4.60)%
(1.56)
0.13
—
9.45 %
3.61 %
7.07
4.13
—
4.82
4.10
—
(4.08)%
(3.99)%
(3.77)%
(5.69)%
The results are primarily due to behavior of demand, money market and savings deposits during such rate fluctuations.
We have found that, historically, interest rates on these deposits change more slowly than changes in the discount and federal funds
rates. This assumption is incorporated into the simulation model and is generally not fully reflected in a gap analysis. The
assumptions incorporated into the model are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure future net
interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will
differ from the model’s simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in
market conditions and the application and timing of various strategies.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements, the reports thereon, the notes thereto and supplementary data commence on page F-1 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. See Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNT AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
76
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the supervision and participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15
(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based upon that evaluation, we have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us
in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed
by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(f) under the
Exchange Act) during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.
As of December 31, 2018, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based
on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework
(2013),” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission. Based on the assessment,
management determined that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.
Grant Thornton LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements of the
Company included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. The report, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, is included in this Item under
the heading “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
77
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Veritex Holdings, Inc.
Opinion on internal control over financial reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Veritex Holdings, Inc. (a Texas corporation) (and subsidiary)
(collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, the
Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based
on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, and our report
dated February 27, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Dallas, Texas
February 27, 2019
78
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
79
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
The information called for by this item is set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 2019 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders (the “2019 Proxy Statement”), to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The information called for by this item is set forth in our 2019 Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The information called for by this item is set forth in our 2019 Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
The information called for by this item is set forth in our 2019 Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
The information called for by this item is set forth in our 2019 Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1.
Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017
and 2016
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
2.
Financial Statement Schedules: All supplemental schedules to the consolidated financial statements have been
omitted as inapplicable or because the required information is included in our consolidated financial statements
or the notes thereto included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
3.
Exhibits.
80
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Veritex Holdings, Inc.
Opinion on the financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Veritex Holdings, Inc. (a Texas corporation) and subsidiary
(collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive
income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and
the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in
the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (“COSO”), and our report dated February 27, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion.
Basis for opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error
or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.
Dallas, Texas
February 27, 2019
F-1
VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2018 and 2017
(Dollars in thousands, except par value information)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities
Loans held for sale
Loans held for investment
Allowance for loan losses
Total loans held for investment, net
Accrued interest receivable
Bank-owned life insurance
Bank premises, furniture and equipment, net
Non-marketable equity securities
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary
Other real estate owned
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $7,528 and $3,468, respectively
Goodwill
Other assets
Branch assets held for sale
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing deposits
Interest-bearing transaction and savings deposits
Certificates and other time deposits
Total deposits
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
Subordinated debentures and subordinated notes
Other borrowings
Branch liabilities held for sale
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017, no shares issued and outstanding
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017; 24,253,894 and 24,109,515 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017, (excluding 10,000 shares held in treasury)
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Unallocated Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares; 9,771 shares at December 31, 2017
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Treasury stock, 10,000 shares at cost
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
December 31,
December 31,
2018
2017
$
84,449
$
262,695
149,044
228,117
1,258
2,555,494
(19,255)
2,536,239
8,828
22,064
78,409
22,822
352
—
15,896
161,447
14,091
—
841
2,233,490
(12,808)
2,220,682
7,676
21,476
75,251
13,732
352
449
20,441
159,452
14,518
33,552
$
$
3,208,550
$
2,945,583
626,283
$
1,313,161
682,984
2,622,428
5,413
5,361
28,019
16,691
—
—
612,830
1,200,487
465,313
2,278,630
5,098
5,446
71,164
16,689
15,000
64,627
2,677,912
2,456,654
—
—
243
449,427
83,968
—
(2,930)
(70)
241
445,517
44,627
(106)
(1,280)
(70)
530,638
488,929
$
3,208,550
$
2,945,583
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-2
VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Income
Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
Interest income:
Loans, including fees
Securities
Deposits in financial institutions and fed funds sold
Other investments
Total interest income
Interest expense:
Transaction and savings deposits
Certificates and other time deposits
Subordinated debentures and subordinated notes
Other borrowed funds
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Noninterest income:
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts
Loan fees
(Loss) gain on sales of investment securities
Gain on sales of loans and other assets owned
Rental income
Other
Total noninterest income
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits
Occupancy and equipment
Professional fees
Data processing and software expense
FDIC assessment fees
Marketing
Amortization of intangibles
Telephone and communications
Merger and acquisition expense
Other
Total noninterest expense
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Preferred stock dividends
Net income available to common stockholders
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
134,460
6,605
3,149
20
144,234
17,599
9,714
1,701
1,031
30,045
114,189
6,603
107,586
3,420
1,332
(64)
3,056
1,654
2,512
11,910
31,138
10,679
6,132
3,020
1,150
1,783
3,467
1,299
5,220
5,371
69,259
50,237
10,896
39,341
$
— $
$
$
$
39,341
1.63
1.60
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-3
73,795
3,462
2,287
8
79,552
8,981
897
531
635
11,044
68,508
5,114
63,394
2,502
657
222
3,141
139
915
7,576
20,828
5,618
2,981
2,217
1,177
1,293
964
720
2,691
4,300
42,789
28,181
13,029
15,152
42
15,110
0.82
0.80
$
$
$
$
$
$
44,681
1,409
503
2
46,595
3,577
1,411
—
652
5,640
40,955
2,050
38,905
1,846
320
15
3,288
—
1,034
6,503
14,332
3,667
2,804
1,158
661
983
380
402
—
2,003
26,390
19,018
6,467
12,551
—
12,551
1.16
1.13
VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
(Dollars in thousands)
Net income
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities available for sale arising during
the period, net
Reclassification adjustment for net (loss) gain included in net income
Other comprehensive (losses) income before tax
Income tax (benefit) expense
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
Comprehensive income
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
$
39,341
$
15,152
$
12,551
(2,153)
(64)
(2,089)
(439)
(1,650)
37,691
$
493
222
271
76
195
$
15,347
$
(1,661)
15
(1,676)
(570)
(1,106)
11,445
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-4
Y
R
A
I
D
I
S
B
U
S
D
N
A
.
C
N
I
,
S
G
N
I
D
L
O
H
X
E
T
I
R
E
V
y
t
i
u
q
E
’
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
S
n
i
s
e
g
n
a
h
C
f
o
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
S
d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
C
6
1
0
2
d
n
a
7
1
0
2
,
8
1
0
2
,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
d
e
d
n
E
s
r
a
e
Y
)
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
t
n
i
s
r
a
l
l
o
D
(
l
a
t
o
T
y
r
u
s
a
e
r
T
k
c
o
t
S
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
e
y
o
l
p
m
E
k
c
o
t
S
p
i
h
s
r
e
n
w
O
s
e
r
a
h
S
n
a
l
P
d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A
r
e
h
t
O
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C
)
s
s
o
L
(
e
m
o
c
n
I
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
E
l
a
n
o
i
t
i
d
d
A
n
I
-
d
i
a
P
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
k
c
o
t
S
n
o
m
m
o
C
t
n
u
o
m
A
s
e
r
a
h
S
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
P
k
c
o
t
S
)
5
7
1
(
8
1
5
,
4
9
3
8
9
2
6
1
9
0
1
1
5
5
,
2
1
)
6
0
1
,
1
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0
0
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
)
6
0
1
,
1
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
5
5
,
2
1
)
5
7
1
(
3
7
4
,
4
9
3
8
9
2
6
1
9
—
—
—
5
4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6
0
1
,
8
3
0
5
7
,
4
4
4
,
4
6
4
0
,
2
3
1
$
)
0
7
(
)
9
0
3
(
$
)
2
4
1
(
$
9
3
7
,
6
1
$
1
2
7
,
5
1
1
$
7
0
1
$
2
7
4
,
2
1
7
,
0
1
8
8
0
,
9
3
2
$
)
0
7
(
$
)
9
0
2
(
$
)
8
4
2
,
1
(
$
0
9
2
,
9
2
$
3
7
1
,
1
1
2
$
2
5
1
$
8
2
3
,
5
9
1
,
5
1
)
2
1
3
(
9
6
1
7
4
9
,
5
3
1
3
0
0
,
0
4
1
8
6
,
6
5
0
0
0
,
9
4
)
0
0
0
,
9
4
(
9
0
1
9
3
9
,
1
2
5
1
,
5
1
)
2
4
(
—
5
9
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3
0
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
)
7
2
2
(
5
9
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
)
2
4
(
7
2
2
—
2
5
1
,
5
1
)
2
1
3
(
9
6
1
6
9
8
,
5
3
1
9
8
9
,
9
3
7
5
6
,
6
5
0
0
5
,
4
2
)
0
0
5
,
4
2
(
9
3
9
,
1
6
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
5
4
1
4
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2
0
6
,
3
4
9
4
9
,
7
1
2
4
6
,
7
1
1
,
5
4
4
9
,
9
4
4
,
1
0
5
0
,
5
8
2
,
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9
2
9
,
8
8
4
$
)
0
7
(
$
)
6
0
1
(
$
)
0
8
2
,
1
(
$
7
2
6
,
4
4
$
7
1
5
,
5
4
4
$
1
4
2
$
5
1
5
,
9
0
1
,
4
2
)
3
9
5
(
4
5
4
9
0
1
8
4
0
,
4
1
4
3
,
9
3
)
0
5
6
,
1
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
8
3
6
,
0
3
5
$
)
0
7
(
$
—
—
—
6
0
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
)
0
5
6
,
1
(
—
—
—
—
—
1
4
3
,
9
3
)
5
9
5
(
4
5
4
8
4
0
,
4
3
—
—
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5
6
7
,
5
0
1
4
1
6
,
8
3
$
)
0
3
9
,
2
(
$
8
6
9
,
3
8
$
7
2
4
,
9
4
4
$
3
4
2
$
4
9
8
,
3
5
2
,
4
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0
0
5
,
4
2
)
0
0
5
,
4
2
(
$
$
$
$
s
g
n
i
d
l
o
h
h
t
i
w
x
a
t
r
e
v
o
c
o
t
d
l
e
h
h
t
i
w
s
e
r
a
h
s
4
8
3
,
0
1
f
o
t
e
n
,
d
e
t
s
e
v
s
t
i
n
u
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
R
9
8
4
$
f
o
t
s
o
c
g
n
i
r
e
f
f
o
t
e
n
,
k
n
a
b
f
o
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
r
o
f
d
e
u
s
s
i
k
c
o
t
S
6
1
0
2
,
1
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
t
a
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
k
c
o
t
s
m
o
r
f
t
i
f
e
n
e
b
x
a
t
s
s
e
c
x
E
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
k
c
o
t
S
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
A
s
e
r
a
h
S
P
O
S
E
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
s
s
o
l
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
6
1
0
2
,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
t
a
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
s
g
n
i
d
l
o
h
h
t
i
w
x
a
t
r
e
v
o
c
o
t
d
l
e
h
h
t
i
w
s
e
r
a
h
s
1
0
6
,
1
1
f
o
t
e
n
,
d
e
t
s
e
v
s
t
i
n
u
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
R
s
e
x
a
t
r
e
v
o
c
o
t
d
l
e
h
h
t
i
w
s
e
r
a
h
s
5
9
0
,
1
f
o
t
e
n
,
s
n
o
i
t
p
o
k
c
o
t
s
e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e
f
o
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E
f
o
t
e
n
,
r
e
g
r
e
m
.
c
n
I
,
s
e
r
a
h
s
c
n
a
B
n
g
i
e
r
e
v
o
S
o
t
n
o
i
t
c
e
n
n
o
c
n
i
s
e
r
a
h
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
f
o
8
3
4
$
f
o
s
t
s
o
c
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I
g
n
i
r
e
f
f
o
4
3
3
$
f
o
s
t
s
o
c
g
n
i
r
e
f
f
o
f
o
t
e
n
,
r
e
g
r
e
m
y
t
r
e
b
i
L
o
t
n
o
i
t
c
e
n
n
o
c
n
i
s
e
r
a
h
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
f
o
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I
n
g
i
e
r
e
v
o
S
f
o
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
e
h
t
h
t
i
w
n
o
i
t
c
e
n
n
o
c
n
i
D
s
e
i
r
e
s
,
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
p
f
o
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I
8
8
2
$
f
o
s
t
s
o
c
g
n
i
r
e
f
f
o
f
o
t
e
n
,
g
n
i
r
e
f
f
o
c
i
l
b
u
p
n
i
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
f
o
e
l
a
S
F-5
r
e
v
o
c
o
t
d
l
e
h
h
t
i
w
s
e
r
a
h
s
f
o
1
9
3
,
4
d
n
a
1
9
6
,
1
f
o
t
e
n
,
s
n
o
i
t
p
o
k
c
o
t
s
e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e
f
o
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E
y
l
e
v
i
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
,
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
e
s
s
e
l
h
s
a
c
d
n
a
s
e
x
a
t
s
g
n
i
d
l
o
h
h
t
i
w
x
a
t
r
e
v
o
c
o
t
d
l
e
h
h
t
i
w
s
e
r
a
h
s
2
8
0
,
0
2
f
o
t
e
n
,
d
e
t
s
e
v
s
t
i
n
u
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
R
1
0
-
8
1
0
2
U
S
A
-
s
t
c
e
f
f
e
x
a
t
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
d
n
i
a
t
r
e
c
f
o
n
o
i
t
a
c
i
f
i
s
s
a
l
c
e
R
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
7
1
0
2
,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
t
a
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
k
c
o
t
S
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
s
e
r
a
h
s
P
O
S
E
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
s
s
o
l
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
8
1
0
2
,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
t
a
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
D
s
e
i
r
e
s
,
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
p
f
o
n
o
i
t
p
m
e
d
e
R
.
c
n
I
,
s
e
r
a
h
s
c
n
a
B
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
d
D
s
e
i
r
e
s
,
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
P
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
k
c
o
t
S
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
A
s
e
r
a
h
S
P
O
S
E
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
S
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
C
o
t
s
e
t
o
N
g
n
i
y
n
a
p
m
o
c
c
a
e
e
S
VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Provision for loan losses
Accretion of loan purchase discount
Stock-based compensation expense
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation
Deferred tax expense (benefit)
Net amortization of premiums on investment securities
Change in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance
Net loss (gain) on sales of investment securities
Gain on sales of loans held for sale
Gain on sales of SBA loans
Net gain on sales of other real estate owned
Amortization of subordinated note discount and debt issuance costs
Originations of loans held for sale
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale
Write down on real estate owned
Gain on sale of branches
Increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses, accrued interest payable and other liabilities
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net proceeds from sale of branch assets and liabilities held for sale
Cash paid in excess of cash received for the acquisition of Sovereign Bancshares, Inc.
Cash received in excess of cash paid for the acquisition of Liberty Bancshares, Inc.
Purchases of securities available for sale
Sales of securities available for sale
Proceeds from maturities, calls and pay downs of investment securities
Purchases (sales) of non-marketable equity securities, net
Net loans originated
Proceeds from sale of SBA loans
Net additions to bank premises and equipment
Net intangible assets and lease obligations related to the purchase of our corporate building
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned and repossessed assets
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net change in deposits
Net (decrease) increase in advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
Net proceeds from sale of common stock in public offering
Net change in other borrowings
Redemption of preferred stock
Dividends paid on preferred stock
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options
Payments to tax authorities for stock-based compensation
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation
Proceeds from payments on ESOP Loan
Offering costs paid in connection with acquisitions
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
$
39,341
$
15,152
$
12,551
7,077
6,603
(8,135)
4,048
(248)
2,707
1,931
(588)
64
(708)
(2,348)
—
2
(35,936)
36,227
156
(349)
(425)
969
50,388
(31,810)
—
—
(811,055)
40,822
731,572
(9,090)
(344,737)
29,010
(5,013)
—
291
2,836
5,114
(3,783)
1,939
(268)
5,143
1,771
(589)
(222)
(942)
(1,940)
(259)
45
(48,567)
53,876
37
—
(1,204)
(1,477)
26,662
—
(11,440)
32,375
(839,963)
159,869
773,702
2,481
(229,402)
30,355
(40,571)
(4,181)
1,920
1,704
2,050
(425)
983
(162)
(1,366)
1,025
(618)
(15)
(1,598)
(1,690)
—
8
(70,773)
69,801
114
—
(1,728)
999
10,860
—
—
—
(357,187)
8,378
319,377
(3,199)
(190,184)
20,574
(1,075)
—
—
(400,010)
(124,855)
(203,316)
344,101
(43,145)
—
(15,000)
—
—
454
(593)
—
109
(899)
285,027
(64,595)
149,044
18,065
(47,142)
56,681
10,375
(24,500)
(227)
175
(318)
—
109
(772)
12,446
(85,747)
234,791
$
84,449
$
149,044
$
251,220
9,862
94,518
—
—
—
—
(175)
162
109
—
355,696
163,240
71,551
234,791
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-6
VERITEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations and Principles of Consolidated Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements include Veritex Holdings, Inc. (“Veritex” or the “Company”), whose business at
December 31, 2018 primarily consisted of the operations of its wholly owned subsidiary, Veritex Community Bank (the “Bank”).
The accounting principles followed by the Company and the methods of applying them are in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and prevailing practices of the banking industry. Intercompany transactions
and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
Veritex is a Texas state banking organization with corporate offices in Dallas, Texas, and as of December 31, 2018 operated
twenty branches and one mortgage office located in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and one branch in the Houston metropolitan
area. The Bank provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers, which include commercial and
retail lending, and the acceptance of checking and savings deposits. The Texas Department of Banking and the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System are the primary regulators of the Company and the Bank, and they perform periodic examinations
to ensure regulatory compliance.
Accounting Standards Codification
The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the officially
recognized source of authoritative GAAP applicable to all public and non-public non-governmental entities. Rules and interpretive
releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of
authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other accounting literature is considered non-authoritative. Citing particular content
in the ASC involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph structure.
Segment Reporting
The Company has one reportable segment. All of the Company’s activities are interrelated, and each activity is dependent
and assessed based on how each activity of the Company supports the others. For example, lending is dependent upon the ability
of the Company to fund itself with deposits and borrowings while managing interest rate and credit risk. Accordingly, all significant
operating decisions are based upon analysis of the Bank as one segment or unit. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker,
the Chief Executive Officer, uses the consolidated results to make operating and strategic decisions.
Reclassifications
Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to current presentation including
reclassifying $2,691 from professional fees to merger and acquisition expense on the consolidated statements of income for the
year ended December 31, 2017.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The allowance for loan losses, the
fair values of financial instruments, realization of deferred tax assets, and the status of contingencies are particularly subject to
change.
F-7
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For the purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks and
federal funds sold.
The Bank maintains deposits with other financial institutions in amounts that exceed federal deposit insurance coverage.
Furthermore, federal funds sold are essentially uncollateralized loans to other financial institutions. Management regularly evaluates
the credit risk associated with the counterparties to these transactions and believes that the Company is not exposed to any significant
credit risks on cash and cash equivalents.
Restrictions on Cash
The Bank is required to maintain regulatory reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank. The reserve balances required
as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 were approximately $64.8 million and $64.3 million, respectively.
Investment Securities
Securities that the Company has both the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity
and are carried at amortized cost. Securities that the Company intends to hold for an indefinite period of time, but not necessarily
to maturity, are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on securities classified as
available for sale have been accounted for as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes. Management determines
the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase.
Interest income includes amortization of purchase premiums and discounts. Realized gains and losses are derived from
the amortized cost of the security sold. Credit related declines in the fair value of securities available for sale below their cost that
are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses, with the remaining unrealized loss recognized
as a component of other comprehensive income. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers,
among other things, (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition
and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (iii) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a
period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and
2016 there were no other-than-temporary impairment losses reflected in earnings as realized losses.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale consist of certain mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market and are
carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value on an individual loan basis. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through
a valuation allowance by charges to income. The Company obtains commitments to purchase the loans from secondary market
investors prior to closing of the loans. Loans held for sale are sold with servicing released. Gains and losses on sales of loans held
for sale are based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related loan sold.
Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
Loans, excluding certain purchased loans that have shown evidence of deterioration since origination as of the date of
the acquisition, that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or repayment are
stated at the amount of unpaid principal, reduced by unearned income and an allowance for loan losses. Interest on loans is
recognized using the effective-interest method on the daily balances of the principal amounts outstanding. Fees associated with
the origination of loans and certain direct loan origination costs are netted and the net amount is deferred and recognized over the
life of the loan as an adjustment of yield.
The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when there is a clear indication that the borrower’s cash flow may not
be sufficient to meet payments as they become due, which is generally no later than when a loan is 90 days past due. When a loan
is placed on non-accrual status, all previously accrued and unpaid interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized
on a cash basis as long as the remaining book balance of the asset is deemed to be collectible. If collectability is questionable,
then cash payments are applied to principal. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts
contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement.
F-8
The allowance for loan losses is an estimated amount management believes is adequate to absorb inherent losses on
existing loans that may be uncollectible based upon review and evaluation of the loan portfolio. Management’s periodic evaluation
of the allowance is based on general economic conditions, the financial condition of borrowers, the value and liquidity of collateral,
delinquency, prior loan loss experience, and the results of periodic reviews of the portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is
comprised of two components: the general reserve and specific reserves. The general reserve is determined in accordance with
current authoritative accounting guidance. The Company’s calculation of the general reserve considers historical loss rates for the
last three years adjusted for qualitative factors based on general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal
and external to the Company. Such qualitative factors include current local economic conditions and trends including
unemployment, changes in lending staff, policies and procedures, changes in credit concentrations, changes in the trends and
severity of problem loans and changes in trends in volume and terms of loans. These qualitative factors serve to compensate for
additional areas of uncertainty inherent in the portfolio that are not reflected in the Company’s historic loss factors. For purposes
of determining the general reserve, the loan portfolio, less cash secured loans, government guaranteed loans and impaired loans,
is multiplied by the Company’s adjusted historical loss rate. Specific reserves are determined in accordance with current
authoritative accounting guidance based on probable losses on specific classified loans.
The allowance for loan losses is increased by charges to income and decreased by charge-offs (net of recoveries).
Due to the growth of the Bank over the past several years, a portion of its lending relationships and the loans in its portfolio
are of relatively recent origin. The new loan portfolios have limited delinquency and credit loss history and have not yet exhibited
an observable loss trend. The credit quality of loans in these loan portfolios is impacted by delinquency status and debt service
coverage generated by the borrowers’ business and fluctuations in the value of real estate collateral. Management considers
delinquency status to be the most meaningful indicator of the credit quality of one-to-four single family residential, home equity
loans and lines of credit and other consumer loans. In general, loans do not begin to show signs of credit deterioration or default
until they have been outstanding for some period of time, a process the Company refers to as “seasoning.” As a result, a portfolio
of older loans will usually behave more predictably than a portfolio of newer loans. Because the majority of the portfolio is
relatively new, the current level of delinquencies and defaults may not be representative of the level that will prevail when the
portfolio becomes more seasoned, which may be higher than current levels.
Delinquency statistics are updated at least monthly. Internal risk ratings are considered the most meaningful indicator of
credit quality for new commercial, construction and commercial real estate loans. Internal risk ratings are a key factor in identifying
loans that are individually evaluated for impairment and impact management’s estimates of loss factors used in determining the
amount of the allowance for loan losses. Internal risk ratings are updated on a continuous basis.
Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable
to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal
and interest payments. If a loan is impaired, a specific valuation allowance is recorded, if necessary. Interest payments on impaired
loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is reasonably assured, in which case interest
is recognized on a cash basis. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.
Company policy requires measurement of the allowance for an impaired collateral dependent loan based on the fair value
of the collateral. Other loan impairments are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows or the loan’s
observable market price. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, all significant impaired loans have been determined to be collateral
dependent and the allowance for loan loss has been measured utilizing the estimated fair value of the collateral.
From time to time, the Company may modify its loan agreement with a borrower. A modified loan is considered a troubled
debt restructuring when two conditions are met: (i) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and (ii) concessions are made
by the Company that would not otherwise be considered for a borrower with similar credit risk characteristics. Modifications to
loan terms may include a lower interest rate, a reduction of principal, or a longer term to maturity. All troubled debt restructurings
are considered impaired loans. The Company reviews each troubled debt restructured loan and determines on a case by case basis
whether a specific valuation allowance is required. A specific valuation allowance is based on either the present value of estimated
future cash flows or the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral.
The Company has certain lending policies and procedures in place that are designed to maximize loan income with an
acceptable level of risk. Management reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis and makes changes
as appropriate. Management receives frequent reports related to loan originations, quality, concentrations, delinquencies, and non-
performing and potential problem loans. Diversification in the loan portfolio is a means of managing risk associated with fluctuations
in economic conditions, both by type of loan and geography.
F-9
Commercial loans are underwritten after evaluating and understanding the borrower’s ability to operate profitably and
effectively. Underwriting standards are designed to determine whether the borrower possesses sound business ethics and practices
and to evaluate current and projected cash flows to determine the ability of the borrower to repay its obligations as agreed.
Commercial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and, secondarily, on the underlying
collateral provided by the borrower. Most commercial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets, such
as accounts receivable or inventory, and include personal guarantees.
Real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial loans. These loans are
underwritten primarily based on projected cash flows and, secondarily, as loans secured by real estate. The repayment of real estate
loans is generally largely dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loans or the business conducted on
the property securing the loan. Real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the
general economy. The properties securing the Company’s real estate portfolio are generally diverse in terms of type and geographic
location, throughout the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and Houston metropolitan area. This diversity helps reduce the exposure to
adverse economic events that may affect any single market or industry.
The Company utilizes methodical credit standards and analyses to supplement its policies and procedures in underwriting
consumer loans. The Company’s loan policy addresses types of consumer loans that may be originated and the collateral, if secured,
which must be perfected. The relatively smaller individual dollar amounts of consumer loans that are spread over numerous
individual borrowers also minimizes the Company’s risk.
Certain Acquired Loans
As part of business acquisitions, the Company evaluated each of the acquired loans under ASC 310-30 to determine
whether (i) there was evidence of credit deterioration since origination, and (ii) it was probable that the Company would not collect
all contractually required payments receivable. The Company determined the best indicator of such evidence was an individual
loan’s payment status and/or whether a loan was determined to be classified based on a review of each individual loan. Therefore,
generally each individual loan that should have been or was on non-accrual at the acquisition date and each individual loan that
was deemed impaired was included subject to ASC 310-30 accounting. Each of these loans was recorded at the discounted expected
cash flows of the individual loan.
Loans that were evaluated under ASC 310-30, and for which the timing and amount of cash flows can be reasonably
estimated, were accounted for in accordance with ASC 310-30-35. The Company applies the interest method for these loans under
this subtopic and excludes the loans from non-accrual. If, at acquisition, the Company identified loans for which it could not
reasonably estimate cash flows or, if subsequent to acquisition, such cash flows could not be estimated, such loans would be
included in non-accrual and accounted for under the cost recovery method. These acquired loans are accounted for individually
and recorded at the allocated fair value, such that there is no carryover of the seller’s allowance for loan losses. The Company
estimates the amount and timing of expected cash flows for each purchased loan, and the expected cash flows in excess of the
allocated fair value are recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan (accretable yield). The excess of the loan’s
contractual principal and interest over expected cash flows is not recorded (non-accretable difference). Over the life of the loan,
expected cash flows continue to be estimated. If the present value of expected cash flows is less than the carrying amount, a loss
is recorded through the allowance for loan losses. If the present value of expected cash flows is greater than the carrying amount,
any related allowance for loan loss is reversed, with the remaining yield being recognized prospectively through interest income.
Accretion of purchase discounts on purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans is based on estimated future cash flows, regardless
of contractual maturities, that include undiscounted expected principal and interest payments and use credit risk, interest rate risk
and prepayment risk models to incorporate management’s best estimate of current key assumptions such as default rates, loss
severity and payment speeds. Accretion of purchase discounts on acquired non-impaired loans is recognized on a level-yield basis
based on contractual maturity of individual loans per ASC 310-20.
Loans to which ASC 310-30 accounting is applied are deemed PCI loans. Revolving loans, including lines of credit, are
excluded from PCI loan accounting.
For acquired loans not deemed to be PCI loans at acquisition, the differences between the initial fair value and the unpaid
principal balance are recognized as interest income on a level-yield basis over the lives of the related loans. Subsequent to the
acquisition date, methods utilized to estimate the required allowance for loan losses for these loans is similar to originated loans;
however, a provision for loan losses will be recorded only to the extent the required allowance exceeds any remaining purchase
discounts.
F-10
Transfers of Financial Assets
Transfers of financial assets (generally consisting of sales of loans held for sale and loan participations with unaffiliated
banks) are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been relinquished. Control over transferred assets is deemed to
be surrendered when the assets have been isolated from the Company, the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that
constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and the Company does not maintain
effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.
Bank Premises and Equipment
Buildings and improvements, furniture and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation computed using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:
Buildings and improvements
Site improvements
Tenant improvements
Leasehold improvements
Furniture and equipment
10 - 40 years
15 years
Lease term
Lease term
3 - 10 years
Major replacements and betterments are capitalized while maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred.
Gains or losses on dispositions are reflected in the consolidated statements of income as incurred.
Non-Marketable Equity Securities
The Bank is a member of its regional Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) and of the Federal Home Loan Bank system
(“FHLB”). FHLB members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and
may invest in additional amounts. Both FRB and FHLB stock are carried at cost, restricted for sale, and periodically evaluated
for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income. Other non-marketable
equity securities are carried at their cost, which approximates fair value.
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned represents properties acquired through or in lieu of loan foreclosure and is initially recorded at
fair value less estimated costs to sell. At foreclosure, if the fair value, less estimated costs to sell, of the real estate acquired is less
than the Bank’s recorded investment in the related loan, a write-down is recognized through a charge to the allowance for loan
losses. If fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Operating costs after
acquisition are expensed.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain employees. These bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”)
policies are recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at their cash surrender values. Income from these policies
and changes in the cash surrender values are recorded in noninterest income in the accompanying consolidated statements of
income.
F-11
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill resulting from a business combination represents the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred
over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill is not amortized but is
reviewed for potential impairment annually on December 31 of each fiscal year or when a triggering event occurs. The Company
may first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50%) that the
fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company has an unconditional option to
bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the
goodwill impairment test, and the Company may resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. If the
Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the
Company proceeds to perform the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. Under the first step, the estimation of fair
value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value, including goodwill. If step one indicates a potential impairment, the
second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment, if any. If the carrying amount of the reporting goodwill exceeds
the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. Any such adjustments
are reflected in the results of operations in the periods in which they become known.
Intangible assets consist of core deposit intangibles, intangible assets related to operating leases with favorable market
terms acquired in business combinations, and in-place lease intangibles associated with the purchase of our corporate office.
Intangible assets are initially recognized based on a valuation performed as of the acquisition date and are amortized on a straight-
line basis over their estimated useful lives of the respective intangible assets as follows:
Core deposit intangible
Operating lease intangible
In-place lease intangible
7 - 10 years
Lease term
Lease term
All indefinite lived intangible assets are tested annually for potential impairment or when triggering events occur.
Intangible assets with definite lives are tested for impairment when a triggering event occurs. No impairment charges related to
goodwill and intangible assets were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
Servicing Assets
The Company accounts for its servicing assets at amortized cost in accordance with ASC 860, Servicing Assets and
Liabilities. The codification requires that servicing rights acquired through the origination of loans, which are sold with servicing
rights retained, are recognized as separate assets. Servicing assets are recorded as the difference between the contractual servicing
fees and adequate compensation for performing the servicing, and are periodically reviewed and adjusted for any impairment. The
amount of impairment recognized, if any, is the amount by which the servicing assets exceed their fair value. Fair value of the
servicing assets is estimated using discounted cash flows based on current market interest rates. Servicing rights are amortized
over their estimated lives.
Branch Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale
The Company reports long-lived assets, including other assets and liabilities, as part of a disposal group, as held for sale
when management has approved or received approval to sell the assets and liabilities, the Company is committed to a formal plan,
the assets and liabilities are available for immediate sale, the assets and liabilities are being actively marketed, the sale is anticipated
to occur during the next 12 months and certain other specific criteria are met. Assets and liabilities held for sale are recorded at
the lower of their carrying amount or estimated fair value less costs to sell. If the carrying amount of the assets and liabilities
exceeds its estimated fair value, a loss is recognized. Depreciation and amortization expense is not recorded on the assets held for
sale after they are classified as held for sale.
Marketing Expense
The Company expenses all marketing costs as they are incurred. Marketing expenses were $1,783, $1,293 and $983 in
2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
F-12
Income Taxes
The Company files a consolidated income tax return with its subsidiaries. Federal income tax expense or benefit is
allocated on a separate return basis.
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred
tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of
a sufficient level of future taxable income and recoverable taxes paid in prior years.
The Company may recognize the tax benefit of an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax
position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. For tax positions
meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements would be the benefit that has a
greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. For the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, management has determined there are no material uncertain tax positions.
When necessary, the Company would include interest assessed by taxing authorities in “Interest expense” and penalties
related to income taxes in “Other expense” on its consolidated statements of income. The Company did not record any interest or
penalties related to income tax for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. With few exceptions, such as state
examinations, the Company is generally no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations by tax authorities for the years
before 2015.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions. Fair value
estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments and other
factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could
significantly affect the estimates. The fair value estimates of existing on and off-balance sheet financial instruments do not include
the value of anticipated future business or the value of assets and liabilities not considered financial instruments.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
The Company records revenue from contracts with customers in accordance with ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from
Contracts with Customers” (“Topic 606”). Under Topic 606, the Company must identify the contract with a customer, identify the
performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations
in the contract, and recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation. Significant revenue has not
been recognized in the current reporting period that results from performance obligations satisfied in previous periods.
The Company’s primary sources of revenue are derived from interest and dividends earned on loans, investment securities
and other financial instruments that are not within the scope of Topic 606. The Company has evaluated the nature of its contracts
with customers and determined that further disaggregation of revenue from contracts with customers into more granular categories
beyond what is presented in the consolidated statements of income was not necessary. The Company generally fully satisfies its
performance obligations on its contracts with customers as services are rendered and the transaction prices are typically fixed;
charged either on a periodic basis or based on activity. Because performance obligations are satisfied as services are rendered and
the transaction prices are fixed, the Company has made no significant judgments in applying the revenue guidance prescribed in
ASC 606 that affect the determination of the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with customers.
Stock Based Compensation
Compensation cost is recognized for stock options and other equity awards (performance and non-performance based)
issued to employees and directors, based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized
to estimate the fair value of stock options. The market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant is used to estimate
fair value for other equity awards. A Monte Carlo simulation is used to estimate the fair value of performance-based restricted
stock units that include a vesting condition and a performance condition based on the Company’s total shareholder return relative
to a peer group comprised of commercial banks in similar markets, which determines the number of shares of Company common
stock subject to the restricted stock unit.
F-13
Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards
with graded vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
Treasury Stock
Treasury stock is stated at cost, which is determined by the first-in, first-out method.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in stockholders’ equity during a period, except those resulting from
transactions with stockholders. In addition to net income, comprehensive income includes the net effect of changes in the fair
value of securities available for sale, net of tax. Comprehensive income is reported in the accompanying consolidated statements
of comprehensive income.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted the Veritex Community Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(“ESOP”), which covers substantially all employees (subject to certain exclusions). The ESOP was amended effective December
31, 2018 to cease new contributions or allocations to the ESOP effective January 1, 2019. All ESOP assets are held in trust and
managed by C. Malcolm Holland, III, in his capacity as the trustee of the ESOP. Shares of the Company’s common stock purchased
by the ESOP were initially held in a suspense account until released for allocation to participants. Prior to January 1, 2019, the
Company made contributions to each eligible participant’s account each year, generally based on the participant’s 401(k)
contribution made during that year. Shares were then released from the suspense accounts and allocated to each participant’s
account based on the amount of the contribution and the fair value of the shares. Compensation expense for these amounts were
measured based upon the expected amount of the Company’s discretionary contribution determined on an annual basis and accrued
ratably over the year. Shares were committed to be released to settle the liability upon formal declaration of the contribution at
the end of the year. The number of shares released to settle the liability was based upon fair value of the shares and became
outstanding shares for earnings per share computations. The cost of shares issued to the ESOP, but not yet committed to be released,
was shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. To the extent that the fair value of the ESOP shares differed from the cost of
such shares, the difference was charged or credited to stockholders’ equity as additional paid in capital.
Business Combinations
The Company applies the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. Under the acquisition method,
the acquiring entity in a business combination recognizes 100% of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their acquisition
date fair values. Management utilizes valuation techniques appropriate for the asset or liability being measured in determining
these fair values. Any excess of the purchase price over amounts allocated to assets acquired, including identifiable intangible
assets, and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. Where amounts allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed is greater
than the purchase price, a bargain purchase gain is recognized. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.
F-14
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share (“EPS”) are based upon the weighted-average number of shares outstanding. The table below sets
forth the reconciliation between weighted average shares used for calculating basic and diluted EPS for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
Earnings (numerator)
Net income
Less: preferred stock dividends
Net income allocated to common stockholders
Shares (denominator)
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic EPS (thousands)
Dilutive effect of employee stock-based awards
Adjusted weighted average shares outstanding
Earnings per share:
Basic
Diluted
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
$
$
$
$
39,341
—
39,341
$
$
15,152
$
12,551
42
—
15,110
$
12,551
24,169
421
24,590
18,404
406
18,810
1.63
1.60
$
$
0.82
0.80
$
$
10,849
209
11,058
1.16
1.13
For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, there were no anti-dilutive shares excluded from the diluted
EPS weighted average shares.
2. Supplemental Statement of Cash Flows
Other supplemental cash flow information is presented below:
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for interest
Cash paid for income taxes
Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Flow Information:
Net issuance of common stock for vesting of restricted stock units
Net foreclosure of other real estate owned and repossessed assets
Transfers to assets held for sale
Transfers to liabilities held for sale
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
$
$
29,178
$
10,680
$
6,525
9,761
595
$
312
$
8
—
—
1,037
33,552
64,627
5,607
8,250
175
283
—
—
F-15
Noncash assets acquired(1)
Investment securities
Loans
Accrued interest receivable
Bank premises, furniture and equipment
Non-marketable equity securities
Other real estate owned
Intangible assets
Goodwill
Other assets
Total assets
Noncash liabilities assumed(1)
Deposits
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(2)
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
Advances from FHLB
Other borrowings
Total liabilities
Non-cash equity assumed
Preferred stock - series D
Total equity
5,117,642 shares of common stock exchanged in connection with the Sovereign acquisition
$
$
$
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
$
— $
220,444
$
(4,050)
1,060,436
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,162
—
—
(956)
1,995
1,806
4,293
24,424
8,847
448
16,722
134,797
484,097
(43) $ 1,954,508
303
$ 1,205,217
$
$
7,571
948
84,625
8,609
$ 1,306,970
$
—
(260)
—
—
43
—
—
24,500
24,500
136,385
40,337
—
— $
—
1,449,944 shares of common stock exchanged in connection with the Liberty acquisition
(1) Represents adjustments to estimates recorded for acquisitions of Sovereign Bancshares, Inc. (“Sovereign”) and Liberty Bancshares, Inc. (“Liberty”). Refer to
Note 24, Business Combinations for further discussion.
(2) Accounts payable and accrued expenses includes accrued preferred stock dividends of $185 for the year ended December 31, 2017.
$
$
3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(“ASU 2014-09”), which requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers
in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The
ASU replaces most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. The new standard was effective for the Company on January
1, 2018. Adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures because the Company’s primary sources of revenues are derived from interest income on financial assets that are not
within the scope of ASU 2014-09. The Company’s revenue recognition pattern for revenue streams within the scope of ASU
2014-09, including but not limited to service charges on deposit accounts, did not change significantly from current practice. The
standard permits the use of either the full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method. The Company elected to use
the modified retrospective transition method which requires application of ASU 2014-09 to uncompleted contracts at the date of
adoption. However, periods prior to the date of adoption will not be retrospectively revised as the impact of the ASU on uncompleted
contracts at the date of adoption was not material.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement
of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”), which amends certain aspects of recognition, measurement,
presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01, among other things, (i) requires equity investments, with
certain exceptions, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, (ii) simplifies the impairment
assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify
impairment, (iii) eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used
to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet,
(iv) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure
F-16
purposes, (v) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair
value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability
at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments, (vi) requires separate presentation of financial assets
and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to
the financial statements and (vii) clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset
related to available for sale securities in combination with the Company’s other deferred tax assets. The adoption of ASU 2016-01
on January 1, 2018 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In accordance with (iv)
above, the Company measured the fair value of its loan portfolio prospectively using an exit price notion. See Note 16, Fair Value
Disclosures, for further information regarding the valuation of these loans.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, (“ASU
2017-04”) eliminates the second step in the goodwill impairment test described above. In addition, the amendment eliminates the
requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that
qualitative test, to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test. For public companies, ASU 2017-04 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests
performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this pronouncement
on the consolidated financial statements, which is not expected to be significant.
ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
(“ASU 2016-13”) amends guidance on reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized cost basis and available for sale debt
securities. For assets held at amortized cost basis, Topic 326 eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold in current GAAP
and, instead, requires an entity to reflect its current estimate of all expected credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is a
valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial assets to present the net amount expected to be
collected. For available for sale debt securities, credit losses should be measured in a manner similar to current GAAP, however
Topic 326 will require that credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down. ASU 2016-13 affects entities
holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. The amendments
affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off-balance sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables,
and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. For public business
entities, ASU 2016-13 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim
periods therein, with early adoption permitted on January 1, 2019. The Company expects ASU 2016-13 to have a significant impact
on the Company’s accounting policies, internal controls over financial reporting and footnote disclosures. The Company has
assessed its data and system needs and has begun designing its financial models to estimate expected credit losses in accordance
with the standard. Further development, testing and evaluation of those models is required to determine the impact that adoption
of this standard will have on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”) is intended to improve the reporting of leasing transactions by
increasing transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance
sheet by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under current U.S. GAAP and disclosing key information about
leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU 2018-11, “Targeted Improvements.” The new standard was
adopted by the Company on January 1, 2019. ASU 2016-02 provides for a modified retrospective transition approach requiring
lessees to recognize and measure leases on the balance sheet at the beginning of either the earliest period presented or as of the
beginning of the period of adoption. The Company has elected to apply ASU 2016-02 as of the beginning of the period of adoption
(January 1, 2019) and will not restate comparative periods. The Company expects that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will result
in the recognition of right-of use-assets and corresponding lease liabilities totaling $7,500 to $9,500 as of the date of adoption.
The initial balance sheet gross up upon adoption is primarily related to operating leases of certain real estate properties. The
Company has no material leasing arrangements for which it is the lessor of property or equipment. The Company has made an
accounting policy election not to apply the recognition requirements in the new standard to short-term leases. The Company has
elected to apply the package of practical expedients as both the lessor and lessee allowed by the new standard under which the
Company need not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, the Company need not reassess the
lease classification for any expired or existing lease, and the Company need not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases.
The Company has also elected to use the practical expedient to make an accounting policy election for leases of certain underlying
assets to include both lease and nonlease components as a single component and account for that single component as a lease.
Adoption of ASU 2016-02 is not expected to materially change the Company’s recognition of lease expense in future periods.
F-17
4. Investment Securities
Debt and equity securities have been classified in the consolidated balance sheets according to management’s intent. The
amortized cost, related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, and fair value of
securities are as follows:
Available for Sale
U.S. government agencies
Corporate bonds
Municipal securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Asset-backed securities
Available for Sale
U.S. government agencies
Corporate bonds
Municipal securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Asset-backed securities
December 31, 2018
Gross
Gross
Amortized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Cost
Gains
Losses
Fair Value
$
9,096
$
— $
26,518
40,275
97,117
92,906
492
266,404
$
$
84
10
101
197
—
392
$
118
134
338
2,167
1,344
—
4,101
$
$
8,978
26,468
39,947
95,051
91,759
492
262,695
December 31, 2017
Gross
Gross
Amortized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Cost
Gains
Losses
Fair Value
$
10,829
$
9
$
17,500
55,499
91,734
53,559
616
330
189
58
9
7
$
18
—
211
1,068
925
—
10,820
17,830
55,477
90,724
52,643
623
$
229,737
$
602
$
2,222
$
228,117
The following tables disclose the Company’s investment securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position
for less than 12 months and those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 or more months:
December 31, 2018
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or More
Totals
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Available for Sale
U.S. government agencies
$
5,671
$
68
$
3,306
$
Corporate bonds
Municipal securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
6,689
16,043
24,277
18,765
134
92
279
71
—
10,428
59,637
42,536
50
—
246
1,888
1,273
$
8,977
$
6,689
26,471
83,914
61,301
118
134
338
2,167
1,344
$ 71,445
$
644
$ 115,907
$
3,457
$ 187,352
$
4,101
F-18
Available for Sale
U.S. government agencies
Municipal securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
December 31, 2017
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or More
Totals
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
$
3,470
$
14,593
52,075
31,581
$ 101,719
$
4
79
513
395
991
$
629
$
14
$
4,099
$
7,092
29,485
20,305
132
555
530
21,685
81,560
51,886
18
211
1,068
925
$ 57,511
$
1,231
$ 159,230
$
2,222
The number of investment positions in an unrealized loss position totaled 142 and 118 at December 31, 2018 and
December 31, 2017, respectively. The Company does not believe these unrealized losses are “other than temporary.” In estimating
other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers, among other things, the length of time and the extent to which
the fair value has been less than cost and the Company’s financial condition and near-term prospects. Additionally, (i) management
does not have the intent to sell more than an insignificant amount of investment securities prior to recovery and/or maturity, (ii) it
is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell these securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and (iii) the length
of time and extent that fair value has been less than cost is not indicative of recoverability. The unrealized losses noted are interest
rate related due to the level of interest rates at December 31, 2018 compared to the time of purchase. The Company has reviewed
the ratings of the issuers and has not identified any issues related to the ultimate repayment of principal as a result of credit concerns
regarding these securities. The Company sold certain securities in January 2019 due to a one-time rebalancing activity and recorded
an insignificant loss.
The amortized costs and estimated fair values of securities available for sale, by contractual maturity, as of the dates
indicated, are shown in the tables below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have
the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Mortgage-backed securities, collateralized
mortgage obligations, and asset-backed securities typically are issued with stated principal amounts, and the securities are backed
by pools of mortgage loans and other loans that have varying maturities. The term of mortgage-backed, collateralized mortgage
obligations and asset-backed securities thus approximates the term of the underlying mortgages and loans and can vary significantly
due to prepayments. Therefore, these securities are not included in the maturity categories below.
December 31, 2018
Available For Sale
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
$
2,963
$
34,933
19,682
18,311
75,889
97,117
92,906
492
2,966
34,854
19,468
18,105
75,393
95,051
91,759
492
$
266,404
$
262,695
Due in one year or less
Due from one year to five years
Due from five years to ten years
Due after ten years
Mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Asset-backed securities
F-19
Due in one year or less
Due from one year to five years
Due from five years to ten years
Due after ten years
Mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Asset-backed securities
December 31, 2017
Available For Sale
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
$
2,328
$
29,654
34,480
17,366
83,828
91,734
53,559
616
2,330
29,991
34,474
17,332
84,127
90,724
52,643
623
$
229,737
$
228,117
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale and gross realized gains and losses for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
Proceeds from sales
Gross realized gains
Gross realized losses
December 31,
2018
$
40,822
$
2017
159,869
$
335
399
398
176
2016
8,378
43
40
As further explained in Note 11, Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, there was a blanket floating lien on all
securities to secure FHLB advances as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
5. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
Loans in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are summarized as follows:
Real estate:
Construction and land
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
Commercial real estate
Commercial
Consumer
Deferred loan fees
Allowance for loan losses
December 31,
2018
2017
$
324,863
$
277,825
10,528
297,917
51,285
1,103,032
760,772
7,112
2,555,509
(15)
(19,255)
2,536,239
$
9,385
236,542
106,275
909,292
684,551
9,648
2,233,518
(28)
(12,808)
2,220,682
$
Included in the net loan portfolio as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is an accretable discount related to purchased
performing and PCI loans acquired in connection with a business combination in the approximate amounts of $22,309 and $12,135,
respectively. The discount is being accreted into income on a level-yield basis over the life of the loans. In addition, included in
F-20
the net loan portfolio as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is a discount on retained loans from sale of originated Small Business
Administration (“SBA”) loans of $2,398 and $1,189, respectively.
The majority of the loan portfolio consists of loans to businesses and individuals in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and
the Houston metropolitan area. This geographic concentration subjects the loan portfolio to the general economic conditions within
these areas. The risks created by this concentration have been considered by management in the determination of the adequacy of
the allowance for loan losses. Management believes the allowance for loan losses was adequate to cover estimated losses on loans
as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Non-Accrual and Past Due Loans
Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such
payments were due. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet
payment obligations as they become due, as well as when required by regulatory provisions. Loans may be placed on non-accrual
status regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued
interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received in excess of principal
due. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and
future payments are reasonably assured.
Non-accrual loans, aggregated by class of loans, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, were as follows:
Real estate:
Construction and land
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
Commercial real estate
Commercial
Consumer
December 31,
2018
2017
$
2,399
$
—
—
—
2,575
19,769
2
$
24,745
$
—
—
—
—
61
398
6
465
At December 31, 2018, non-accrual loans included PCI loans of $16,902 for which discount accretion has been suspended
because the extent and timing of future cash flows from these PCI loans can no longer be reasonably estimated. There were no
PCI loans classified as non-accrual at December 31, 2017.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, interest income not recognized on non-accrual loans, excluding PCI loans,
was $724. During the year ended December 31, 2017, interest income not recognized on non-accrual loans was minimal.
An age analysis of past due loans, aggregated by class of loans, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:
F-21
30 to 59
Days
60 to 89
Days
90 Days
or Greater
Total
Past Due
Total Current
PCI
Total
Loans
Total 90 Days
Past Due
and Still
Accruing(1)
December 31, 2018
Real estate:
Construction and land
$
305
$ — $
— $
305
$
324,558
$ — $ 324,863
$
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
—
131
—
Commercial real estate
3,465
Commercial
Consumer
816
10
—
266
—
—
828
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
397
—
3,465
1,644
10
10,528
297,435
51,285
1,082,559
735,391
7,102
—
85
—
17,008
23,737
—
10,528
297,917
51,285
1,103,032
760,772
7,112
$ 4,727
$ 1,094
$
— $
5,821
$ 2,508,858
$ 40,830
$2,555,509
$
(1) Loans 90 days past due and still accruing excludes $527of PCI loans as of December 31, 2018.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
30 to 59
Days
60 to 89
Days
90 Days
or Greater
Total
Past Due
Total
Current (1)
PCI
Total
Loans
Total 90 Days
Past Due
and Still
Accruing (2)
December 31, 2017
Real estate:
Construction and land
$
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
Commercial real estate
Commercial
Consumer
320
104
1,274
—
1,830
1,849
39
$
— $
— $
—
139
—
—
389
51
—
—
—
—
389
18
320
104
1,413
—
1,830
2,627
108
$ 277,505
$ — $ 277,825
$
9,232
235,030
106,275
890,145
651,777
9,540
49
99
—
17,317
30,147
—
9,385
236,542
106,275
909,292
684,551
9,648
407
(1) To conform to the current period presentation, $15,123 of loans were reclassified from 1-4 family residential to multi-family residential within the total
current column. Additionally, PCI loan balances were reclassified from the total current column to the PCI column.
(2) Loans 90 days past due and still accruing excludes $3,300 of PCI loans as of December 31, 2017.
$2,179,504
$2,233,518
$ 6,402
$ 5,416
$ 47,612
579
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
18
18
No loans were 90 days past due and still accruing as of December 31, 2018. Loans 90 days past due and still accruing
interest were $18 as of December 31, 2017. These loans are considered well-secured and in the process of collection as of the
reporting date with plans in place for the borrowers to bring the loans fully current. The Company believes that it will collect all
principal and interest due on each of the loans 90 days past due and still accruing.
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans are those loans where it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance
with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal and interest payments. All troubled debt
restructurings (“TDRs”) are considered impaired loans. Impaired loans are measured based on either the present value of expected
future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral
if the loan is collateral dependent. Substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans are measured at the fair value of the collateral.
Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.
F-22
Impaired loans, including TDRs, at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are summarized in the following tables.
December 31, 2018(1)
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
with No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
with
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
YTD
Real estate:
Construction and land
$
2,016
$
2,016
$
— $
2,016
$
— $
2,262
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
Commercial real estate
Commercial
Consumer
Total
(1) Loans reported exclude PCI loans.
—
542
—
2,939
3,228
66
—
542
—
2,939
644
66
—
—
—
—
2,584
—
—
542
—
2,939
3,228
66
—
—
—
—
368
—
—
565
—
3,032
3,351
79
$
8,791
$
6,207
$
2,584
$
8,791
$
368
$
9,289
December 31, 2017(1)
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
with No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
with
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
YTD
Real estate:
Construction and land
$
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
Commercial real estate
Commercial
Consumer
Total
(1) Loans reported exclude PCI loans.
—
161
—
434
398
75
—
161
—
434
282
75
—
—
—
—
116
—
—
161
—
434
398
75
$
1,068
$
952
$
116
$
1,068
$
—
—
—
—
12
—
12
—
—
163
—
445
499
87
$
1,194
Interest payments on impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is
reasonably assured, in which case interest is recognized on a cash basis.
Troubled Debt Restructuring
Modifications of terms for the Company’s loans and their inclusion as TDRs are based on individual facts and
circumstances. Loan modifications that are included as TDRs may involve a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan, an
extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, or deferral
of principal payments, regardless of the period of the modification. The recorded investment in TDRs was $1,171 and $618 as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
F-23
There were three new TDRs during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2016, and no new TDRs during the year
ended December 31, 2017. The terms of certain loans modified as TDRs during the year ended December 31, 2018 and December
31, 2016 are summarized in the following tables:
During the year ended December 31, 2018
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Commercial
Total
Commercial
Consumer
Total
Number
of Loans
Pre-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
628
$
$
628
3
3
Adjusted
Interest
Rate
Extended
Maturity
Extended
Maturity
and
Restructured
Payments
$
$
— $
— $
612
612
$
$
Extended
Maturity,
Restructured
Payments and
Adjusted
Interest Rate
—
— $
— $
—
During the year ended December 31, 2016
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Number
of Loans
Pre-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
175
$
81
256
$
$
$
2
1
3
Adjusted
Interest
Rate
Extended
Maturity
Extended
Maturity
and
Restructured
Payments
— $
—
— $
— $
—
— $
169
81
250
$
Extended
Maturity,
Restructured
Payments and
Adjusted
Interest Rate
—
$
—
—
All TDRs are measured individually for impairment. Of the three new TDR loans during the year ended December 31,
2018, one was past due and two were performing as agreed to in the modified terms. A specific allowance for loan loss of $56
was recorded for one of three TDR loans as of December 31, 2018. Two of the three TDR loans were on non-accrual status as of
December 31, 2018.
Interest income recorded during 2018, 2017 and 2016 on TDR loans and interest income that would have been recorded
had the terms of the loan not been modified was minimal.
There were no loans modified as a TDR loan for which there was a payment default during the year ended December 31,
2018 or December 31, 2017. A default for purposes of this disclosure is a TDR loan as to which the borrower is 90 days past due
or results in the foreclosure and repossession of the applicable collateral.
The Company has not committed to lend additional amounts to customers with outstanding loans that were classified as
TDRs as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Credit Quality Indicators
From a credit risk standpoint, the Company classifies its loans in one of the following categories: (i) pass, (ii) special
mention, (iii) substandard or (iv) doubtful. Loans classified as loss are charged off. Loans not rated special mention, substandard,
doubtful or loss are classified as pass loans.
The classification of each loan reflects a judgment about the risks of default and loss associated with the loan. The
Company reviews the ratings on criticized credits monthly. Ratings are adjusted to reflect the degree of risk and loss that is felt
to be inherent in each credit as of each monthly reporting period. All classified credits are evaluated for impairment. If impairment
is determined to exist, a specific reserve is established. The Company’s methodology is structured so that specific reserves are
increased in accordance with deterioration in credit quality (and a corresponding increase in risk and loss) or decreased in accordance
with improvement in credit quality (and a corresponding decrease in risk and loss).
Credits rated special mention show clear signs of financial weaknesses or deterioration in creditworthiness; however,
such concerns are generally not so pronounced that the Company expects to experience significant loss in the short term. Such
F-24
credits typically maintain the ability to perform within standard credit terms and credit exposure is not as prominent as credits
with a lower rating.
Credits rated substandard are those in which the normal repayment of principal and interest may be, or has been, jeopardized
by reason of adverse trends or developments of a financial, managerial, economic or political nature, or important weaknesses
existing in the applicable collateral. A protracted workout on these credits is a distinct possibility. Prompt corrective action is
therefore required to strengthen the Company’s position and/or to reduce exposure and to assure that adequate remedial measures
are taken by the borrower. Credit exposure becomes more likely in such credits and a serious evaluation of the secondary support
to the credit is performed.
Credits rated doubtful are those in which full collection of principal appears highly questionable, and in which some
degree of loss is anticipated, even though the ultimate amount of loss may not yet be certain and/or other factors exist that could
affect collection of debt. Based upon available information, positive action by the Company is required to avert or minimize loss.
Credits rated doubtful are generally also placed on non-accrual.
Credits classified as PCI are those that, at the applicable acquisition date, had the characteristics of substandard loans
and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required principal and interest payments would not be collected. The
Company evaluates these loans quarterly on a projected cash flow basis.
The following tables summarize the Company’s internal ratings of its loans, including PCI loans, as of December 31,
2018 and 2017:
Real estate:
Pass
Special
Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
PCI
Total
December 31, 2018
Construction and land
$
320,987
$
1,860
$
2,016
$
— $
— $
324,863
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
Commercial real estate
Commercial
Consumer
Total
Real estate:
10,528
296,870
51,285
1,065,982
720,583
6,950
—
236
—
7,056
8,900
—
—
726
—
12,986
7,552
162
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
85
—
17,008
23,737
—
10,528
297,917
51,285
1,103,032
760,772
7,112
$ 2,473,185
$
18,052
$
23,442
$
— $
40,830
$ 2,555,509
Pass(1)
Special
Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
PCI
Total
December 31, 2017
Construction and land
$
277,186
$
639
$
— $
— $
— $
277,825
Farmland
1 - 4 family residential
Multi-family residential
Commercial real estate
Commercial
Consumer
Total
9,336
235,781
106,275
882,523
634,796
9,540
—
462
—
8,771
18,337
—
—
200
—
681
1,155
108
—
—
—
—
116
—
49
99
—
17,317
30,147
—
9,385
236,542
106,275
909,292
684,551
9,648
$ 2,155,437
$
28,209
$
2,144
$
116
$
47,612
$ 2,233,518
(1) To conform to the current period presentation, $15,123 was reclassified from 1-4 family residential to multi-family residential within the pass column. There
were no reclassifications between internal rating categories.
An analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
F-25
Balance at beginning of year
Provision charged to earnings
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Net charge-offs
Balance at end of year
For the
For the
For the
Year Ended
Year Ended
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
12,808
$
December 31, 2017
8,524
$
December 31, 2016
6,772
$
6,603
(197)
41
(156)
19,255
$
5,114
(839)
9
(830)
12,808
$
$
2,050
(333)
35
(298)
8,524
The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 0.75%, 0.57% and 0.86% as of December 31, 2018,
2017 and 2016, respectively.
The following tables summarize the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the periods indicated.
There were no allowance for loan losses related to PCI loans at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
December 31, 2018
Balance at beginning of year
Provision (recapture) charged to earnings
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Net charge-offs (recoveries)
Balance at end of year
Period-end amount allocated to:
Specific reserves
PCI reserves
General reserves
Total
$
$
$
$
Construction,
Land and
Farmland
1,315
929
—
—
—
Real Estate
Residential
1,473
$
502
—
—
—
Commercial
Real Estate
4,410
$
2,053
—
—
—
2,244
$
1,975
$
6,463
$
Commercial
5,588
$
Consumer
22
$
Total
12,808
$
3,100
(175)
41
(134)
8,554
$
19
(22)
—
(22)
19
$
6,603
(197)
41
(156)
19,255
— $
— $
— $
368
$
— $
368
—
2,244
—
1,975
—
6,463
1,302
6,884
2,244
$
1,975
$
6,463
$
8,554
$
—
19
19
1,302
17,585
$
19,255
F-26
Balance at beginning of year
Construction,
Land and
Farmland
$
1,415
Real Estate
Residential
1,116
$
Provision (recapture) charged to earnings
(100)
December 31, 2017
Commercial
Real Estate
3,003
$
1,407
—
—
—
$
4,410
$
Commercial
2,955
$
Consumer
35
$
(13)
—
Total
$
8,524
5,114
(839)
9
(830)
12,808
—
—
22
$
3,452
(828)
9
(819)
5,588
—
—
—
1,315
$
368
(11)
—
(11)
1,473
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Net charge-offs (recoveries)
Balance at end of year
Period-end amount allocated to:
Specific reserves:
General reserves
Total
$
$
$
— $
— $
— $
1,315
1,473
4,410
1,315
$
1,473
$
4,410
$
12
5,576
5,588
December 31, 2016
Construction,
Land and
Farmland
1,104
311
—
—
—
Real Estate
Residential
1,124
$
(8)
—
—
—
814
—
—
—
913
(314)
32
(282)
2,955
1,415
$
1,116
$
3,003
$
— $
— $
— $
1,415
1,116
3,003
1,415
$
1,116
$
3,003
$
246
2,709
2,955
$
$
$
— $
12
22
22
12,796
$
12,808
20
(19)
3
(16)
35
4
31
35
$
$
$
2,050
(333)
35
(298)
8,524
250
8,274
8,524
$
$
$
Commercial
Real Estate
2,189
$
Commercial
2,324
$
Consumer
31
$
Total
$
6,772
Balance at beginning of year
Provision (recapture) charged to earnings
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Net charge-offs (recoveries)
Balance at end of year
Period-end amount allocated to:
Specific reserves:
General reserves
Total
$
$
$
$
The Company’s recorded investment in loans as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the balance in the
allowance for loan losses on the basis of the Company’s impairment methodology is as follows:
December 31, 2018
Loans individually evaluated for impairment $
2,016
Construction,
Land and
Farmland
Real Estate
Residential
542
$
Commercial
Real Estate
2,939
$
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
333,375
348,575
1,083,085
PCI loans
Total
Commercial
3,228
$
Consumer
66
$
Total
$
8,791
733,807
23,737
7,046
2,505,888
—
40,830
—
85
17,008
$ 335,391
$ 349,202
$1,103,032
$ 760,772
$
7,112
$2,555,509
F-27
Loans individually evaluated for impairment $
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
287,161
342,557
PCI loans
Total
December 31, 2017
Real Estate
Construction,
Land and
Farmland
Residential
161
— $
49
99
Commercial
Real Estate
434
$
891,541
17,317
Commercial
398
$
Consumer
75
$
Total
$
1,068
654,006
30,147
9,573
2,184,838
—
47,612
$ 287,210
$ 342,817
$ 909,292
$ 684,551
$
9,648
$2,233,518
Loans acquired with evidence of credit quality deterioration at acquisition, for which it was probable that the Company
would not be able to collect all contractual amounts due, were accounted for as PCI loans. The carrying amount of PCI loans
included in the consolidated balance sheets and the related outstanding balances at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are set forth in
the table below. The outstanding balance represents the total amount owed, including accrued but unpaid interest, and any amounts
previously charged off.
Carrying amount
Outstanding balance
December 31, 2018
December 31, 2017
$
39,528
$
49,902
47,612
63,940
Changes in the accretable yield for PCI loans for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are included
in table below. There was no accretable yield balance for PCI loans for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Balance at beginning of period
Purchase accounting adjustments
Reclassifications from nonaccretable
Accretion
Balance at year-end
Servicing Assets
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
$
$
2,723
$
1,459
19,162
(4,597)
18,747
$
—
3,927
—
(1,204)
2,723
The Company was servicing loans of approximately $71,159 and $74,737 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
A summary of the changes in the related servicing assets are as follows:
Balance at beginning of year
Servicing assets acquired through acquisition
Increase from loan sales
Amortization charged as a reduction to income
Transfer of servicing assets to held for sale
Balance at year-end
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
$
1,215
$
—
470
(381)
—
$
1,304
$
601
313
522
(193)
(28)
1,215
The estimated fair value of the servicing assets approximated the carrying amount at December 31, 2018. Fair value is
estimated by discounting estimated future cash flows from the servicing assets using discount rates that approximate current market
rates over the expected lives of the loans being serviced. A valuation allowance is recorded when the fair value is below the carrying
amount of the asset. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were no valuation allowances recorded.
F-28
The Company may also receive a portion of subsequent interest collections on loans sold that exceed the contractual
servicing fees. In that case, the Company records an interest-only strip based on its relative fair market value and the other
components of the loans. There was no interest-only strip receivable recorded at December 31, 2018 and 2017.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Bank sold $26,662, $27,747 and $18,704,
respectively, of SBA loans resulting in a gain of $2,348, $1,940 and $1,690, respectively. The gain on sale of SBA loans is recorded
in gain on sales of loans in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
6. Bank Premises and Equipment
Bank premises and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are summarized as follows:
Building and improvements
Site improvements
Tenant improvements
Leasehold improvements
Land
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
Construction in Progress
Less accumulated depreciation
December 31,
2018
2017
$
37,526
$
35,239
672
744
4,456
33,393
9,426
2,182
88,399
9,990
$
78,409
$
140
744
5,132
33,002
7,588
456
82,301
7,050
75,251
The Company recorded depreciation expense of approximately $3,017, $1,566 and $1,111 for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
7. Non-marketable Equity Securities
Investments in non-marketable equity securities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are summarized as
follows:
FRB of Dallas stock
FHLB of Dallas stock
Other non-marketable equity securities
December 31,
2018
2017
$
$
12,324
$
2,957
7,541
3,482
6,431
3,819
22,822
$
13,732
F-29
8. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are summarized as follows:
Core deposit intangibles
Servicing asset
Intangible lease assets
Core deposit intangibles
Servicing asset
Other intangible assets
December 31, 2018
Weighted
Gross
Net
Amortization
Intangible
Accumulated
Intangible
Period
7.7 years
6.8 years
2.7 years
Asset
$
16,051
Amortization
4,376
$
Asset
$
11,675
2,091
5,282
787
2,365
1,304
2,917
$
23,424
$
7,528
$
15,896
December 31, 2017
Weighted
Gross
Net
Amortization
Intangible
Accumulated
Intangible
Period
8.7 years
6.8 years
3.3 years
Asset
$
17,007
Amortization
2,694
$
Asset
$
14,313
1,621
5,281
406
368
1,215
4,913
$
23,909
$
3,468
$
20,441
For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, amortization expense related to intangible assets
of approximately $4,060, $1,270 and $595, respectively, is included within amortization of intangibles, occupancy and equipment
and other income within the consolidated statements of income. The estimated aggregate future amortization expense for intangible
assets remaining as of December 31, 2018 was as follows:
Year
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter
9. Goodwill
$
Amount
2,961
2,744
2,169
1,959
1,789
4,274
$
15,896
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are summarized as
follows:
Balance as of December 31, 2017
Sovereign acquisition
Liberty acquisition
Balance as of December 31, 2018
F-30
December 31,
2018
159,452
2,210
(215)
161,447
$
$
2017
26,865
109,091
23,496
159,452
$
$
10. Deposits
Deposits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are summarized as follows:
Noninterest-bearing demand accounts
Interest-bearing demand accounts
Savings accounts
Limited access money market accounts
Certificates of deposit, greater than $100
Certificates of deposit, less than $100
Total
December 31,
2018
626,283
$
2017
612,830
$
146,969
33,147
1,133,045
392,935
290,049
187,516
52,822
960,149
419,888
45,425
$
2,622,428
$
2,278,630
As of December 31, 2018, the scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit were as follows:
Year
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total
Amount
$
576,466
71,686
28,777
3,526
2,529
$
682,984
The aggregate amount of demand deposit overdrafts that have been reclassified as loans were $153 and $203 as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Brokered deposits at December 31, 2018 and 2017 totaled approximately $234,190
and $88,195, respectively.
11. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”)
Advances from the FHLB totaled $28,019 and $71,164 at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of December 31,
2018, the advances were collateralized by a blanket floating lien on certain securities and loans, had a weighted average rate of
2.36% and mature on various dates in 2019 and 2022. The Company had the availability to borrow additional funds of approximately
$1,022,090 as of December 31, 2018.
Contractual maturities of FHLB advances at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
2019
2022
Total
12. Other Credit Extensions
$
$
25,000
3,019
28,019
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company maintained two credit facilities with commercial banks that provide
federal funds credit extensions with an availability to borrow up to an aggregate amount of approximately $75,000 and $55,000,
respectively. There were no borrowings under these credit facilities as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company maintained a secured line of credit with the FRB with an availability
to borrow approximately $404,981 and $338,592, respectively. Approximately $524,016 and $423,062 of commercial loans were
pledged as collateral at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. There were no borrowings under this line of credit as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017.
F-31
13. Borrowed Funds
Borrowed funds in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
Junior subordinated debentures
Subordinated notes (1)
Federal funds purchased
(1) Subordinated notes are net of discount of $11 and $13 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Junior Subordinated Debentures
December 31,
2018
2017
$
$
11,702
4,989
—
11,702
4,987
15,000
In connection with a previous acquisition, the Company assumed $3,093 in fixed to floating rate junior subordinated
debentures underlying common securities and preferred capital securities (the “Parkway Trust Securities”), issued by Parkway
National Capital Trust I (“Parkway Trust”), a statutory business trust and acquired wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The
Company became a guarantor and, as such, unconditionally guaranteed payment of accrued and unpaid distributions required to
be paid on the Parkway Trust Securities subject to certain exceptions, the redemption price when a capital security is called for
redemption and amounts due if Parkway Trust is liquidated or terminated.
The Company owns all of the outstanding common securities of the Parkway Trust. The Parkway Trust used the proceeds
from the issuance of the Parkway Trust Securities to buy the debentures originally issued by Fidelity Resource Company. These
debentures are the Parkway Trust’s only assets and the interest payments from the debentures finance the distributions paid on the
Parkway Trust Securities.
The Parkway Trust Securities pay cumulative cash distributions quarterly at a rate per annum equal to the 3-month LIBOR
plus 1.85%. So long as no event of default leading to an acceleration event has occurred, the Company has the right at any time
and from time to time during the term of the debentures to defer payments of interest by extending the interest distribution period
for up to twenty consecutive quarterly periods. The effective rate as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 was 4.64% and 3.44%,
respectively. The Parkway Trust Securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the
debentures at the stated maturity in the year 2036 or their earlier redemption, in each case at a redemption price equal to the
aggregate liquidation preference of the Parkway Trust Securities plus any accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon to the
date of redemption. Prior redemption is permitted under certain circumstances.
In connection with the acquisition of Sovereign on August 1, 2017, the Company assumed $8,609 in floating rate junior
subordinated debentures underlying common securities and preferred capital securities (the “SovDallas Trust Securities”), issued
by SovDallas Capital Trust I (“SovDallas Trust”), a statutory business trust and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The
Company became a guarantor and, as such, unconditionally guaranteed payment of accrued and unpaid distributions required to
be paid on the SovDallas Trust Securities subject to certain exceptions, the redemption price when a capital security is called for
redemption and amounts due if SovDallas Trust is liquidated or terminated. The Company also owns all of the outstanding common
securities of the SovDallas Trust.
The SovDallas Trust invested the total proceeds from the sale of the SovDallas Trust Securities and the investment in
common shares in floating rate junior subordinated debentures originally issued by Sovereign. Interest on the SovDallas Trust
Securities is payable quarterly at a rate equal to 3-month LIBOR plus 4.0%. Principal payments are due at maturity in July 2038.
The effective rate as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 was 6.40% and 5.34%. The SovDallas Trust Securities are guaranteed by
the Company and are subject to redemption. The Company may redeem the debt securities, in whole or in part, at any time at an
amount equal to the principal amount of the debt securities being redeemed plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
The Parkway Trust Securities and SovDallas Trust Securities qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to regulatory limitations,
under guidelines established by the Federal Reserve.
F-32
Subordinated Notes
During 2013 the Company issued, in the aggregate principal amount of $5,000, subordinated promissory notes (the
“Notes”) in a private offering. The Notes were issued to certain entities controlled by an affiliate of the Company. The Notes are
unsecured, with interest payable quarterly at a fixed rate of 6.0% per annum, and unpaid principal and interest due at the stated
maturity on December 31, 2023. The Notes qualify as Tier 2 Capital, subject to regulatory limitations, under guidelines established
by the Federal Reserve. In addition, the Notes may be redeemed, in whole or in part, on any interest payment date that occurs on
or after December 23, 2018, subject to approval of the Federal Reserve.
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company issued warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock
of the Company at an exercise price of $11.00 per share, exercisable at any time, in whole or in part, prior to December 31, 2023.
The fair value of the warrants was calculated at $0.80 and is recorded as additional paid-in capital, and the related debt discount
is being accreted into interest expense.
Federal Funds Purchased
Federal funds purchased are unsecured overnight borrowings from other financial institutions. At December 31, 2018,
the Company had no federal funds purchased. At December 31, 2017, the Company had $15,000 in federal funds purchased
carried at a rate of 2.00%, which matured and was paid off on January 1, 2018.
14. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is summarized as follows:
Income tax expense (benefit):
Current
Deferred
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
$
$
8,189
2,707
10,896
$
$
7,886
5,143
13,029
$
$
7,833
(1,366)
6,467
The table below reconciles income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 computed by
applying the applicable U.S. federal statutory income tax rate, reconciled to the tax expense computed at the effective income tax
rate:
Federal incomes tax expense rate at 21% for December 31, 2018 and 35%
for December 31, 2017 and 2016
$
Bank-owned life insurance
Non-deductible dues and memberships
Non-deductible meals and entertainment
Non-deductible transaction costs
Tax exempt interest income
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation
Deferred tax asset re-measurement due to the Tax Act
Other
Total income tax expense
Effective tax rate
$
F-33
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
10,550
(124)
104
108
727
(169)
(248)
34
(86)
10,896
$
$
9,863
(206)
132
80
202
(178)
(268)
3,051
353
$
13,029
$
21.7%
46.2%
6,656
(216)
59
49
—
—
—
—
(81)
6,467
34.0%
Income tax expense for 2017 was impacted by the adjustment of our deferred tax assets and liabilities related to the
reduction in the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to 21% under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. As a result of the new law, and as
detailed in the table above, we recognized a provisional net tax expense totaling $3,051 in 2017 and an additional net tax expense
resulting from a finalization of those calculations totaling $34 in 2018.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the recorded amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes, and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s
deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
Deferred tax assets:
Organizational costs
Allowance for loan losses
Capital loss carryforward
FHLB Borrowing
Deferred rent expenses
Restricted stock
Stock options
Accrued bonuses
Loan discounts
Deferred compensation
Other real estate owned
Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale
Other
Total deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Core deposit intangibles
Partnership investments
Bank premises and equipment
Prepaid expenses
Other
Total deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax asset
December 31,
2018
2017
$
52
$
3,985
57
21
511
264
652
372
64
2,592
57
28
302
201
334
22
2,176
4,805
193
—
779
130
115
219
340
137
9,192
9,216
2,187
487
1,959
342
67
5,042
$
4,150
$
3,034
497
912
—
163
4,606
4,610
Included within other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 is a current tax
receivable of $4,982 and a deferred tax asset of $4,150. Included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December
31, 2017 is a current tax receivable of $7,085, a net deferred tax asset of $4,937 in other assets and a deferred tax liability of $327
in branch liabilities held for sale.
15. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The Company may from time to time be involved in legal actions arising from normal business activities. Management
believes that these actions in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a defendant are without merit or that the ultimate
liability, if any, resulting from them will not materially affect the financial position or results of operations of the Company.
F-34
Lessee: Operating Leases
The Company leases several of its banking facilities and equipment under operating leases expiring in various years
through 2026 and sublets one operating lease that expires in 2025. Certain of the operating leases have rent escalation clauses
based on pre-determined annual rate increases and provide for renewal options at their fair value at the time of renewal.
As of December 31, 2018, future minimum rental payments, exclusive of taxes and other charges, under non-cancelable
operating leases for each of the next five years were:
Year Ending December 31,
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter
Total
Future
Minimum
Rentals
Payments
$
$
1,913
1,696
1,294
1,138
962
1,794
8,797
Rental expense was approximately $2,832, $2,298 and $1,432 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016,
respectively. Sublease rental income was approximately $192, $139 and $58 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and
2016, respectively.
As part of the Sovereign acquisition and the Company’s evaluation of acquired facilities owned or leased for ongoing
economic benefit, a decision was made to discontinue using two acquired leases during the fourth quarter of 2017 that expire
between 2026 and 2029. In accordance with accounting for exit and disposal activities, the Company recognized a liability in 2017
for lease exit costs incurred when it no longer derived economic benefits from the related leases. In January 2018, the Company
entered into an assignment agreement to assign one of the two branch leases the Company had ceased using in 2017 to a third
party. As a result of the lease assignment, the Company reversed $669 of the cease-use liability during the year ended December
31, 2018.
A cease-use liability of $652 and $1,407 is included in accrued interest payable and other liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. An analysis of the cease-use liability for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:
Beginning Balance
Additions
Payments
Reversal upon lease assignment
Ending Balance
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
1,407
$
—
(86)
(669)
652
$
—
1,524
(117)
—
1,407
$
$
F-35
Lessor: Operating Leases
The Company has multiple operating leases with various tenants for partial use of our owned corporate building space,
which was purchased by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2017. The rest of the building is used by the Company
for corporate offices. These operating leases expire in various years through 2023.
As of December 31, 2018, future minimum payments receivable under non-cancelable operating leases for each of the
next five years were:
Year Ending December 31,
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total
$
Future
Minimum
Rental
Payments
2,097
1,908
1,113
646
163
$
5,927
Rental income was approximately $1,654 and $139 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. No
rental income was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2016.
The below table summarizes the costs, accumulated amortization/depreciation and net carrying amount of the corporate
building asset and liability components as they are presented on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 and
2017.
2018
Accumulated
Amortization/
Depreciation
Cost
Net Carrying
Amount
Cost
2017
Accumulated
Amortization/
Depreciation
Net Carrying
Amount
Bank premises, furniture and equipment:
Building and improvements
$
19,903
$
(535) $
19,368
$
19,872
$
(33) $
884
16,781
37,568
(308)
—
(843)
576
16,781
36,725
884
16,781
37,537
(32)
—
(65)
19,839
852
16,781
37,472
4,765
(2,113)
2,652
4,765
(241)
4,524
Site and tenant improvements
Land
Intangible assets:
Intangible lease assets
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities:
Intangible lease obligations
584
(168)
416
584
(19)
565
Total
$
41,749
$
(2,788) $
38,961
$
41,718
$
(287) $
41,431
Qualified Affordable Housing Investment
Starting in 2017, the Company began investing in certain qualified housing projects. At December 31, 2018 and 2017,
the balance of the investment for qualified affordable housing projects was $3,663 and $1,982, respectively. This balance is reflected
in non-marketable equity securities on the consolidated balance sheets. The total unfunded commitment related to the investment
in a qualified housing project totaled $2,510 and $1,765 at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, which is reflected in accrued
interest payable and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company expects to fulfill this commitment during
the year ending 2034.
F-36
As of December 31, 2018, the expected future minimum commitment payments under the Company’s qualified affordable
housing investment for each of the following five years were:
Year Ending December 31,
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter
Total
16. Fair Value Disclosures
Future
Minimum
Payments
$
1,303
825
129
22
21
145
2,445
$
The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that
the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of
a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market
used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a
transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that
are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants
are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to
transact.
The authoritative guidance requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the
income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market
transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert
future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on
the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement costs). Valuation techniques
should be consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that
reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability
developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, the authoritative guidance establishes a
fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1 Inputs. Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting
entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs. Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices
for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the asset or liability (for example, interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default
rates) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 2 investments consist primarily of obligations of U.S. government agencies, corporate bonds, municipal securities,
mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations and asset-backed securities.
Level 3 Inputs. Significant unobservable inputs that reflect an entity’s own assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.
In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available,
fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation
F-37
adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. While management believes the Company’s
valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or
assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the
reporting date.
A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general
classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis include the following:
Investment Securities Available for Sale: Securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing
Level 2 inputs. For those securities classified as Level 2, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent
pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows,
the U. S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data for similar securities, market consensus prepayments speeds,
credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things.
The following table summarizes assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 and 2017,
segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:
As of December 31, 2018
Investment securities available for sale
As of December 31, 2017
Investment securities available for sale
Fair Value
Measurements Using
Level 1
Inputs
Level 2
Inputs
Level 3
Inputs
Total
Fair Value
$
$
— $
262,695
$
— $
262,695
— $
228,117
$
— $
228,117
There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
There were no transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured
at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is
evidence of impairment).
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include impaired loans and other real estate owned. Impaired loans
and other real estate owned that are collateral dependent are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral adjusted
by additional Level 3 inputs, such as estimated costs to sell. Impaired loans and other real estate owned secured by real estate,
receivables or inventory had discounts determined by management on an individual loan basis. Impaired loans and other real estate
owned that are not collateral dependent are measured for impairment by a discounted cash flow analysis using a net present value
calculation that utilizes data from the loan file. As such, the fair value of impaired loans and other real estate owned are considered
a Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Appraisals for impaired loans and other real estate owned are performed by certified general appraisers whose
qualifications and licenses have been reviewed and verified by the Company. Once reviewed, a member of the credit department
reviews the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal as well as the overall resulting fair value in comparisons to
independent data sources such as recent market data or industry wide-statistics. On a periodic basis, the Company compares the
actual selling price of collateral that has been sold to the most recent appraised value to determine what additional adjustments,
if any, should be made to the appraisal value to arrive at fair value.
The Company records other real estate owned at fair value less estimated costs to sell at the date of foreclosure. After
foreclosure, other real estate owned is carried at the lower of the initial carrying amount (fair value less estimated costs to sell or
lease) and the value determined by subsequent appraisals or internal valuations of the other real estate owned.
F-38
The following table summarizes assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 and
2017, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:
As of December 31, 2018
Assets:
Impaired loans
As of December 31, 2017
Assets:
Impaired loans
Other real estate owned
Fair Value
Measurements Using
Level 1
Inputs
Level 2
Inputs
Level 3
Inputs
Total
Fair Value
$
$
$
— $
— $
2,584
$
2,584
— $
— $
— $
— $
116
449
$
$
116
449
At December 31, 2018, impaired loans had a carrying value of $2,584, with $368 specific allowance for loan loss allocated.
At December 31, 2017, impaired loans had a carrying value of $116, with $12 specific allowance for loan loss allocated.
There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company is required under current authoritative guidance to disclose the estimated fair value of its financial instrument
assets and liabilities, including those subject to the requirements discussed above. For the Company, as for most financial
institutions, substantially all of its assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments, as defined in such guidance. Many
of the Company’s financial instruments, however, lack an available trading market as characterized by a willing buyer and willing
seller engaging in an exchange transaction.
The estimated fair value amounts of financial instruments have been determined by the Company using available market
information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret data to develop an
estimate of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company
could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or valuation methodologies may have a
material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. In addition, reasonable comparability between financial institutions may not
be likely due to the wide range of permitted valuation techniques and numerous estimates that must be made given the absence
of active secondary markets for many of the financial instruments. This lack of uniform valuation methodologies also introduces
a greater degree of subjectivity to these estimated fair values.
The methods and assumptions used by the Company in estimating fair values of financial instruments as disclosed herein
in accordance with ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, other than for those measured at fair value on a recurring and
nonrecurring basis discussed above, are as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates their fair value.
Loans and loans held for sale: The fair value of loans, excluding previously presented impaired loans measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis, is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis. The discount rates used to determine fair value
use interest rate spreads that reflect factors such as liquidity, credit, and prepayment risk of the loans. Loans are considered a Level
3 financial asset. Loans held for sale approximate their carrying value and are considered Level 2 financial assets.
Accrued interest: The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate their fair values due to short-term maturity.
Bank-owned life insurance: The carrying amounts of bank-owned life insurance policies approximate their fair value.
Servicing Assets: The estimated fair value of the servicing assets approximated the carrying amount at December 31,
2018 and December 31, 2017. Fair value is estimated by discounting estimated future cash flows from the servicing assets using
discount rates that approximate current market rates over the expected lives of the loans being serviced. A valuation allowance is
F-39
recorded when the fair value is below the carrying amount of the asset. At December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, no valuation
allowance was recorded.
Non-marketable equity securities: The fair value of restricted securities, such as stock in the FHLB of Dallas, FRB of
Dallas and other non-marketable equity securities is their cost basis due to restrictions placed on the securities’ transferability. As
a result, the fair value of these non-marketable equity securities was not practicable to determine.
Branch assets held for sale: This includes loans, accrued interest, bank premises, furniture and equipment, intangible
assets and the cash balances related to branches that were held for sale. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accrued
interest and intangible assets approximates their fair value. The fair value of the bank premises, furniture and equipment is
determined based on third party appraisals of similar properties. The fair value of the loans held for sale are estimated using a
discounted cash flow analysis that applies interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar
credit quality.
Deposits: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at
the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate certificates of deposit (“CDs”) approximate
their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate CDs are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that
applies interest rates currently being offered on CDs to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank: The fair value of advances maturing within 90 days approximates carrying
value. Fair value of other advances is based on the Company’s current borrowing rate for similar arrangements.
Junior subordinated debentures, subordinated notes and other borrowings: The fair values are based upon prevailing
rates on similar debt in the marketplace.
Branch liabilities held for sale: This includes deposits and accrued interest related to branches that were held for sale.
The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates its fair value. The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition,
equal to the amounts payable on demand at the reporting date (that is their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-
rate CDs approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate CDs are estimated using a discounted cash
flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on CDs to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities
on time deposits.
Off-balance sheet instruments: Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are generally priced at market
at the time of funding and were not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
F-40
The estimated fair values and carrying values of all financial instruments under current authoritative guidance as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
December 31, 2018
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Loans held for sale
Loans
Accrued interest receivable
Bank-owned life insurance
Servicing asset
Non-marketable equity securities
Financial liabilities:
Deposits
Advances from FHLB
Accrued interest payable
Subordinated debentures and subordinated notes
December 31, 2017
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Loans held for sale
Loans
Accrued interest receivable
Bank-owned life insurance
Servicing asset
Non-marketable equity securities
Financial instruments assets held for sale
Financial liabilities:
Deposits
Advances from FHLB
Accrued interest payable
Subordinated debentures and subordinated notes
Financial instruments liabilities held for sale
17. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
Carrying
Amount
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Fair Value
$
84,449
$
— $
84,449
$
1,258
2,555,494
8,828
22,064
834
22,822
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,258
—
8,828
22,064
834
22,822
$
2,622,428
$
— $
2,506,379
$
28,019
1,135
16,691
—
—
—
28,063
1,135
16,691
$
149,044
$
— $
149,044
$
841
2,220,682
7,676
21,476
1,243
13,732
31,828
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
841
—
7,676
21,476
1,243
13,732
5,515
$
2,278,630
$
— $
2,164,498
$
71,164
445
16,689
64,300
—
—
—
—
70,110
445
16,689
64,300
—
—
2,553,376
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,234,094
—
—
—
—
26,313
—
—
—
—
—
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the
financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.
Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated
balance sheets.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to a financial instrument for
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The
Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet
instruments.
F-41
The following table sets forth the approximate amounts of these financial instruments as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Commitments to extend credit
Standby and commercial letters of credit
December 31,
2018
962,436
5,431
967,867
$
$
2017
606,451
9,299
615,750
$
$
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements. Management evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis
and substantially all of the Company’s commitments to extend credit are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit
standards at the time of future loan funding. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon extension of credit, is
based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer
to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment
of a fee. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to
customers. The Company’s policy for obtaining collateral and the nature of such collateral is essentially the same as that involved
in making commitments to extend credit.
Although the maximum exposure to loss is the amount of such commitments, management currently anticipates no
material losses from such activities.
18. Employee Benefits
Defined Contribution Plan
The Company maintains a retirement savings 401(k) profit sharing plan (the “Plan”) in which substantially all employees
may participate. The Plan allows employees to make discretionary “before tax” contributions through salary reductions under
section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company may make a discretionary match of employees’ contributions based
on a percentage of salary deferrals and certain discretionary profit sharing contributions. No matching contributions to the Plan
were made for the years ending December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the Plan was amended in December 2018 to start contributing
matching contributions by the Company effective January 1, 2019.
ESOP
Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted the ESOP, which covers substantially all employees (subject to certain
exclusions). The ESOP was amended effective December 31, 2018 to cease new contributions or allocations to the ESOP effective
January 1, 2019. All ESOP assets are held in trust and managed by C. Malcolm Holland, III, in his capacity as the trustee of the
ESOP. Shares of the Company’s common stock purchased by the ESOP were initially held in a suspense account until released
for allocation to participants. Prior to January 1, 2019, the Company made contributions to each eligible participant’s account each
year, generally based on the participant’s 401(k) contribution made during the year. Shares were then released from the suspense
account and allocated to each participant’s account, based on the amount of the contribution and the fair value of the shares.
Compensation expense for these amounts was measured based upon the expected amount of the Company’s discretionary
contribution determined on an annual basis and accrued ratably over the year. Shares were committed to be released to settle the
liability upon formal declaration of the contribution at the end of the year. The number of shares released to settle the liability was
based upon fair value of the shares and became outstanding shares for earnings per share computations. The cost of shares issued
to the ESOP, but not yet committed to be released, was shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. To the extent that the fair
value of the ESOP shares differed from the cost of such shares, the difference is charged or credited to stockholders’ equity as
additional paid in capital.
F-42
On January 3, 2014, the ESOP borrowed $500 from the Company and purchased 46,082 shares of the common stock of
the Company. This note was fully repaid in December 2018, and all shares have been allocated to participant accounts. The ESOP
debt was secured by shares of the Company. The loan was repaid from contributions made by the Company to the ESOP. As the
debt was repaid, shares were released from collateral and allocated to participants’ accounts. For the year ended December 31,
2018 and 2017, the Company received a $109 debt payment from the ESOP and released 9,771 and 9,012 shares from collateral
(and, as noted above, such shares were also released from the suspense account). The released shares were allocated to participants’
accounts.
The Company issued 9,147 shares to the ESOP in June of 2015 to settle in full the 401(k) matching liability that was
accrued prior to the origination of the $500 loan to the ESOP in January 2014.
Compensation expense attributed to the ESOP contributions recorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of
income for years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $863, $240 and $204, respectively.
The following is a summary of the ESOP shares as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
Allocated shares
Unearned shares
Total ESOP shares
Fair value of unearned shares
19. Stock and Incentive Plans
2010 Stock Option and Equity Incentive Plan
December 31,
2018
2017
63,040
—
63,040
$
— $
53,269
9,771
63,040
256
In 2010, the Company adopted the 2010 Stock Option and Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Incentive Plan”), which the
Company’s shareholders approved in 2011. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to
grants or options under the 2010 Incentive Plan is 1,000,000. The 2010 Incentive Plan is administered by the Board of Directors
of the Company (the “Board”) and provides for both the direct award of stock and the grant of stock options to eligible directors,
officers, employees and outside consultants of the Company or its affiliates as defined in the 2010 Incentive Plan. The Company
may grant either incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options as directed in the 2010 Incentive Plan.
The Board authorized grants of equity awards under the 2010 Incentive Plan consisting of 100,000 shares of direct stock
awards (restricted shares) and 900,000 shares of stock options, of which 500,000 shares are or were performance-based stock
options. Options were generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock as of the date of
the grant. In general, the terms of awards varied depending on whether a participant was a shareholder owning more than 10%
of the total combined voting power of all classes of Company stock (a “controlling participant”). Options granted to non-controlling
participants generally vested after 5 years of continuous service, with 10-year contractual terms, and forfeiture of unexercised
options upon termination of employment with the Company. Other grant terms varied for controlling participants. Restricted share
awards generally vested after 4 years of continuous service. The terms of the 2010 Incentive Plan provide that all unearned non-
performance options and restricted shares become immediately exercisable and fully vested upon a change in control.
During the years ending December 31, 2018 , 2017 and 2016, the Company did not award any restricted stock units, non-
performance based stock options or performance-based stock options or other awards under the 2010 Incentive Plan.
Stock based compensation expense is measured based upon the fair market value of the award at the grant date and is
recognized ratably over the period during which the shares are earned (the requisite service period). For the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, approximately $27, $63 and $125 of stock compensation expense related to the 2010 Incentive
Plan, respectively, was recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
F-43
A summary of the status of options granted under the 2010 Incentive Plan at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 and
changes during the years then ended is presented below:
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2016
Forfeited
Exercised
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
Exercised
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
Options exercisable at December 31, 2018
2010 Incentive Plan
Nonperformance-based stock options
Shares
Underlying
Options
325,500
(3,000)
(17,500)
305,000
(30,000)
275,000
272,000
$
$
$
$
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
10.15
10.00
10.00
10.16
10.61
10.12
10.09
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
4.56 years
3.59 years
2.39 years
2.36 years
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$
$
$
308
323
3,098
3,070
As of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, there was approximately $2, $8, and $21, respectively, of unrecognized
compensation expense related to non-performance-based stock options. The unrecognized compensation expense as of
December 31, 2018 is minimal and will be recognized during 2019.
A summary of the status of the restricted stock units under the 2010 Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2018, 2017, and
2016 and changes during the years is presented below:
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
Vested into shares
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
Forfeited
Vested into shares
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
Forfeited
Vested into shares
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
2010 Incentive Plan
Nonperformance-
based restricted stock units
Shares
Underlying
Options
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$
$
$
39,750
(12,000)
27,750
(2,500)
(1,000)
24,250
(500)
(23,750)
— $
11.34
10.00
11.92
10.85
10.85
13.19
10.85
12.14
—
As of December 31, 2018, there was no remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted
stock units. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there was $15 and $90, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation expense
related to non-vested restricted stock units.
F-44
A summary of the fair value of the Company’s stock options exercised and restricted stock units vested under the 2010
Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is presented below:
Nonperformance-based stock options exercised
Nonperformance-based restricted stock units vested
803
713
488
26
—
194
Fair Value of Options Exercised or Restricted Stock Units Vested as of
December 31,
2018
2017
2016
2014 Omnibus Plan
In September 2014, the Company adopted an omnibus incentive plan (the “2014 Omnibus Plan”). The purpose of the
2014 Omnibus Plan is to attract and retain outstanding individuals to serve as officers, employees, directors, consultants and other
service providers, in order to increase shareholder value and advance the Company’s growth and success. The 2014 Omnibus Plan
is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board and allows the Committee to grant incentive awards in the form of
stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance units, restricted stock, restricted stock units, cash-based
awards, and other types of awards permitted under the plan. The maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock
that may be issued pursuant to grants or options under the 2014 Omnibus Plan is 1,000,000. The Board has approved a proposal,
to be presented to the shareholders of the Company at the Company’s 2019 annual meeting, to authorize an increase in the aggregate
number of shares that are available for grant under the 2014 Omnibus Plan to a number of shares to be determined by the Company's
officers and specified in the proposal to shareholders.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company awarded 60,650 non-performance restricted stock units, 40,269
performance-based restricted stock units and 137,576 non-performance-based stock options under the 2014 Omnibus Plan. During
the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company awarded 121,125 non-performance based restricted stock units, 26,398
performance based restricted stock units, and 212,983 non-performance-based stock options under the 2014 Omnibus Plan. During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company awarded 25,060 non-performance based restricted stock units, 34,190
performance based restricted stock units and 76,286 non-performance-based stock options under the 2014 Omnibus Plan.
The non-performance based options and non-performance based restricted stock units generally vest equally over three
or five years from the date of grant. The performance-based restricted stock units include a market condition based on the Company’s
total shareholder return relative to a market index that determines the number of restricted stock units that may vest equally over
a three year period from the grant date. The market condition is determined at the end of the calendar year in which the performance-
based restricted stock units are granted. The non-performance restricted stock units fully vest over the requisite service period
generally ranging from one to five years.
Stock-based compensation expense is measured based upon the fair market value of the award at the grant date and is
recognized ratably over the period during which the shares are earned (the requisite service period). Compensation expense for
option and restricted stock unit awards granted under the 2014 Omnibus Plan for the year ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and
2016 was $4,021, $1,876 and $857, respectively.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the
following assumptions used for the grants:
Dividend yield
Expected life
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
For the Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
—%
—%
—%
5.0 to 7.5 years
6.13 to 7.5 years
5.0 to 6.5 years
27.87% to 37.55%
30.56% to 33.19%
33.37% to 37.55%
1.06% to 2.94%
1.96% to 2.32%
1.06% to 2.01%
The expected life is based on the expected amount of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The
dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history. The expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the
Company as well as the volatility of certain comparable public company peers. The risk-free interest rates are based upon yields
of U.S. Treasury issues with a term equal to the expected life of the option being valued.
F-45
A summary of the status of the Company’s options under the 2014 Omnibus Plan as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and
2016 changes during the year then ended, is as follows:
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
Granted
2014 Omnibus Plan
Nonperformance-based stock options
Shares
Underlying
Options
52,080
76,286
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$ 14.35
15.98
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
9.12 years
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
128,366
$ 15.32
8.69 years
Granted
Forfeited
Exercised
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
Granted
Forfeited
Exercised
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
Options exercisable at end of period
212,983
26.97
(9,082) $ 19.45
(1,544)
15.00
330,723
$ 22.71
8.86 years
137,576
(4,083)
(14,696)
449,520
28.04
27.59
15.29
$
$ 24.47
8.24 years $
129,115
$ 20.04
7.36 years $
89
(1,409)
173
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period
$
9.78
As of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 there was $2,103, $1,958 and $425 of total unrecognized compensation expense
related to stock options awarded under the 2014 Omnibus Plan, respectively.
A summary of the status of the Company’s non-performance based restricted stock units under the 2014 Omnibus Plan
as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and changes during the year then ended is as follows:
2014 Omnibus Plan
Nonperformance-based restricted stock units
Shares
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
70,919
25,060
(28,023)
67,956
121,125
(34,342)
(4,017)
150,722
60,650
(73,988)
(3,929)
133,455
$
$
$
$
13.29
15.83
14.35
13.79
27.19
19.74
21.36
13.29
29.27
24.44
26.29
19.67
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
Granted
Vested into shares
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
Granted
Vested into shares
Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
Granted
Vested into shares
Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
F-46
A Monte Carlo simulation is used to estimate the fair value of performance-based restricted stock units that include a
vesting condition and a performance condition based on the Company’s total shareholder return relative to a peer group comprised
of commercial banks in similar markets, which determines the number of shares of Company common stock subject to the restricted
stock unit. A summary of the status of the Company’s performance based restricted stock units under the 2014 Omnibus Plan as
of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and changes during the years then ended is as follows:
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
Granted
Vested into shares
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
Granted
Vested into shares
Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
Granted
Vested into shares
Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
2014 Omnibus Plan
Performance-based restricted stock units
Shares
25,474
$
34,190
(8,467)
51,197
26,398
(19,861)
(4,140)
53,594
40,269
(28,109)
(1,766)
63,988
$
$
$
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
8.72
9.52
14.17
13.30
24.43
15.34
17.91
17.68
27.59
18.69
27.59
21.28
As of December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 there was $3,430, $3,592 and $1,089 of total unrecognized compensation
expense related to restricted stock units awarded under the 2014 Omnibus Plan, respectively.
A summary of the fair value of the Company’s stock options exercised and restricted stock units vested under the 2014
Omnibus Plan as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is presented below:
Nonperformance-based stock options exercised
Nonperformance-based restricted stock units vested
Performance-based restricted stock units vested
20. Significant Concentrations of Credit Risk
Fair Value of Options Exercised or Restricted Stock Units Vested as of
December 31,
2018
2017
2016
383
2,128
745
41
568
530
—
505
137
Most of the Company’s business activity is with customers located within the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and Houston
metropolitan area. Such customers are normally also depositors of the Company.
The distribution of commitments to extend credit approximates the distribution of loans outstanding. Commercial and
standby letters of credit were granted primarily to commercial borrowers.
The contractual amounts of credit related financial instruments such as commitments to extend credit, credit card
arrangements, and letters of credit represent the amounts of potential accounting loss should the contract be fully drawn upon, the
customer default, and the value of any existing collateral become worthless.
F-47
21. Related Party Transactions
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has and expects to continue to have transactions, including borrowings,
with its employees, officers, directors and their affiliates. These loans are on substantially the same terms, including interest rates
and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other unaffiliated persons and do not involve more
than normal risk of collectability. The aggregate amounts of such loans were approximately $70,220 and $44,134 as of December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2018, new advances of approximately $45,801 were made to
related parties with approximately $19,715 principal payments received. During the year ended December 31, 2017, new advances
of approximately $34,903 were made to related parties with approximately $18,065 principal payments received. There were
$15,730 and $7,191 in unfunded commitments to related parties as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. At December 31,
2018, there were no loans to employees, officers, directors or their affiliates that were considered non-performing or potentially
problem loans.
Deposits received from related parties as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 totaled approximately $30,977 and $16,023,
respectively.
As disclosed in Note 13, Borrowed Funds, the Company issued $5,000 in subordinated notes to certain entities controlled
by an affiliate of the Company.
22. Preferred Stock
In connection with the acquisition of Sovereign on August 1, 2017, the Company assumed 24,500 shares of Sovereign’s
Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, no par value (the “Sovereign SBLF Preferred Stock”), issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of the acquisition. At the time of the consummation of the acquisition, each
share of Sovereign SBLF Preferred Stock was converted into one share of Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual, Series D Preferred
Stock of the Company (“Veritex Series D Preferred Stock”).
On August 8, 2017, the Company redeemed all 24,500 shares of the Veritex Series D Preferred Stock at its liquidation
value of $1,000 per share plus accrued dividends for a total redemption amount of $24,727. The Company assumed $185 of accrued
dividends in connection with the acquisition of Sovereign on August 1, 2017 out of the $227 in dividends paid in the year ended
December 31, 2017. The redemption was approved by the Company’s primary federal regulator and was funded with the Company’s
surplus capital. The redemption terminated the Company’s participation in the Small Business Lend Fund (“SBLF”) program.
23. Capital Requirements and Restrictions on Retained Earnings
Under applicable U.S. banking laws, there are legal restrictions limiting the amount of dividends the Company can declare.
Approval of the regulatory authorities is required if the effect of the dividends declared would cause regulatory capital of the
Company to fall below specified minimum levels.
The Company on a consolidated basis and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered
by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements triggers certain mandatory and may lead to additional
discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital
guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated
under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments
by the regulators about components of capital, risk weightings of assets, and other factors.
In July 2013, the Federal Reserve published final rules for the adoption of the Basel III regulatory capital framework (the
“Basel III Capital Rules”). The Basel III Capital Rules, among other things, (i) introduce a new capital measure called “Common
Equity Tier 1” (“CET1”), (ii) specify that Tier 1 capital consist of Common Equity Tier 1 and “Additional Tier 1 Capital” instruments
meeting specified requirements, (iii) define Common Equity Tier 1 narrowly by requiring that most deductions/adjustments to
regulatory capital measures be made to Common Equity Tier 1 and not to the other categories of capital and (iv) expand the scope
of the deductions/adjustments as compared to existing regulations. The Basel III Capital Rules became effective for the Company
on January 1, 2015, with certain transition provisions to be fully phased in by January 1, 2019.
The Basel III Capital Rules also call for a capital conservation buffer that is added to each of the required capital ratios.
The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress and effectively increases the minimum
required risk-weighted capital ratios. Failure to satisfy the buffer requirement will result in limits on capital distributions and
F-48
discretionary bonus payments. In 2018, the buffer requirement was 1.875%, and the fully phased-in requirement of 2.5% will be
effective January 1, 2019.
The Basel III Capital Rules establish quantitative measures to ensure capital adequacy. The Bank must maintain minimum
ratios (set forth in the table below) of total Tier 1, and CET1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as
defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2018 and
December 31, 2017 that the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject.
Starting in January 2016, implementation of the capital conservation buffer became effective for the Company beginning
at the 0.625% level and increasing 0.625% each year thereafter, until it reached 2.50% on January 1, 2019. The capital conservation
buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress and effectively increases the minimum required risk-weighted
capital ratios.
As of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company’s and the Bank’s capital ratios exceeded those levels
necessary to be categorized as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized
as “well capitalized”, the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum total risk based, CET1, Tier 1 risk based and Tier 1
leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since December 31, 2018 that management believes have
changed the Company’s category.
F-49
A comparison of the Company’s and Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios to required capital amounts and ratios is
presented in the following table:
Actual
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
$ 394,419
12.98%
$ 243,093
353,640
11.64
243,052
8.0%
8.0
n/a
$ 303,814
n/a
10.0%
370,175
334,385
12.18
11.01
182,352
182,226
358,473
334,385
11.80
11.01
370,175
334,385
12.04
10.87
136,706
136,670
122,982
123,049
6.0
6.0
4.5
4.5
4.0
4.0
n/a
242,968
n/a
197,412
n/a
153,811
n/a
8.0
n/a
6.5
n/a
5.0
$ 342,521
13.16%
$ 208,219
296,207
11.37
208,413
8.0%
8.0
n/a
$ 260,516
n/a
10.0%
324,726
283,399
12.48
10.88
156,118
156,286
313,024
283,399
12.03
10.88
324,726
283,399
12.92
11.28
117,091
117,215
100,534
100,496
6.0
6.0
4.5
4.5
4.0
4.0
n/a
208,382
n/a
169,310
n/a
125,620
n/a
8.0
n/a
6.5
n/a
5.0
As of December 31, 2018
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Company
Bank
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted
assets)
Company
Bank
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-
weighted assets)
Company
Bank
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Company
Bank
As of December 31, 2017
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Company
Bank
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted
assets)
Company
Bank
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-
weighted assets)
Company
Bank
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Company
Bank
24. Business Combinations
All acquisitions were accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of
the acquired entities were recorded at their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market willing participants
at the measurement date. The Company determines the estimated fair values after review and consideration of relevant information,
including discounted cash flows, quoted market prices, third party valuations, and estimates made by management. The excess of
the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets for tax-free acquisitions is recorded as goodwill, none of which
is deductible for tax purposes. Acquisition-related costs are recognized separately from the acquisition and are expensed as incurred.
The results of operations for each acquisition have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial results beginning on
the respective acquisition date.
F-50
Sovereign Bancshares, Inc.
On August 1, 2017, the Company acquired Sovereign, a Texas corporation and the parent company of Sovereign Bank.
The Company issued 5,117,642 shares of its common stock and paid $56,215 in cash to Sovereign in consideration for the
acquisition. Additionally, under the terms of the merger agreement, each share of Sovereign SBLF Preferred Stock issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time was converted into one share of Veritex Series D Preferred Stock. See Note
22, Preferred Stock for additional information.
The business combination was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Under this method of accounting,
assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their estimated fair values. The excess cost over fair value of net assets
acquired is recorded as goodwill. As the consideration paid for Sovereign exceeded the fair value of the net assets acquired,
goodwill of $111,301 was recorded related to the acquisition. This goodwill resulted from the combination of expected operational
synergies and increased market share in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and Houston metropolitan area. Goodwill is not tax
deductible.
Fair Value
The following table presents the amounts recorded on the consolidated balance sheets on the acquisition date of August
1, 2017, showing the estimated fair value as reported at December 31, 2017, the measurement period adjustments and the fair
value determined to be final as of March 31, 2018.
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities
Loans
Accrued interest receivable
Bank premises, furniture and equipment
Non-marketable equity securities
Other real estate owned
Intangible assets
Goodwill
Other assets
Total Assets
Liabilities
Deposits
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
Junior subordinated debentures
Estimate at
December 31,
2017
Adjustments
Final Fair Value
$
44,775
$
— $
166,307
752,450
3,102
17,805
6,751
282
8,454
109,091
13,148
—
(4,622)
—
474
—
—
749
2,210
1,189
$
$
1,122,165
$
— $
809,366
$
6,284
806
80,000
8,609
— $
—
—
—
—
44,775
166,307
747,828
3,102
18,279
6,751
282
9,203
111,301
14,337
1,122,165
809,366
6,284
806
80,000
8,609
Total liabilities
$
905,065
$
— $
905,065
Preferred stock - series D
Total stockholders’ equity
Consideration
Market value of common stock issued
Cash paid
Total fair value of consideration
24,500
24,500
—
—
24,500
24,500
$
$
136,385
56,215
192,600
$
$
— $
—
— $
136,385
56,215
192,600
F-51
Acquisition-related Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company incurred no pre-tax merger and acquisition expenses related to the
Sovereign acquisition. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred $1,731 of pre-tax merger and acquisition
expenses related to the Sovereign acquisition. Merger and acquisition expenses are included in merger and acquisition expenses
in the consolidated statements of income.
Acquired Loans and Purchased Credit Impaired Loans
Acquired loans were recorded at fair value based on a discounted cash flow valuation methodology that considers, among
other things, projected default rates, loss given defaults and recovery rates. No allowance for credit losses was carried over from
Sovereign.
The Company has identified certain acquired loans as PCI. PCI loan identification considers payment history and past
due status, debt service coverage, loan grading, collateral values and other factors that may indicate deterioration of credit quality
since origination.
The following table discloses the fair value and contractual value of loans acquired from Sovereign on August 1, 2017:
Real Estate
Commercial
Consumer
Total fair value
Contractual principal balance
PCI Loans
Other Acquired
Loans
Total Acquired
Loans
$
$
$
17,708
$
518,261
$
29,877
—
47,585
67,985
$
$
180,730
1,252
700,243
707,071
$
$
535,969
210,607
1,252
747,828
775,056
The following table presents additional information about PCI loans acquired from Sovereign on August 1, 2017:
Contractually required principal and interest
Non-accretable difference
Cash flows expected to be collected
Accretable difference
Fair value of PCI loans
Intangible Assets
PCI Loans
85,125
33,064
52,061
4,476
47,585
$
$
The following table discloses the fair value of intangible assets acquired from Sovereign on August 1, 2017:
Core deposit intangibles(1)
Servicing asset(2)
Intangible lease assets(3)
Gross Intangible
Asset
$
$
8,452
317
434
9,203
(1) The Company estimated a useful life of 7.7 years for core deposit intangibles.
(2) The Company estimated a weighted-average useful life of 6.1 years for servicing asset which will be amortized on a straight line basis.
(3) The Company estimated a weighted-average useful life of 5.0 years for intangible lease assets which will be amortized on a straight line basis.
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
The Company assumed from Sovereign $80,000 in advances from the FHLB as of August 1, 2017 that matured in full
from August 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017.
F-52
Redemption of Veritex Series D Preferred Stock
On August 8, 2017, the Company redeemed all 24,500 shares of the Veritex Series D Preferred Stock at its liquidation
value of $1,000 per share plus accrued dividends for a total redemption amount of $24,727. The Company assumed $185 of accrued
dividends in connection with the acquisition of Sovereign on August 1, 2017 out of the $227 in dividends paid in the year ended
December 31, 2017. The redemption was approved by the Company’s primary federal regulator and was funded with the Company’s
surplus capital. The redemption terminated the Company’s participation in the SBLF program.
Liberty Bancshares, Inc.
On December 1, 2017, the Company acquired Liberty, a Texas corporation and the parent company of Liberty Bank. The
Company issued 1,449,944 shares of its common stock and paid $25,009 in cash to Liberty in consideration for the acquisition.
The business combination was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. As the consideration paid for
Liberty exceeded the fair value of the net assets acquired, goodwill of $23,281 was recorded related to the acquisition. This goodwill
resulted from the combination of expected operational synergies and increased market share in Tarrant County. Goodwill is not
tax deductible.
Fair Value
The following table presents the amounts recorded on the consolidated balance sheets on the acquisition date of December
1, 2017, showing the estimated fair value as reported at December 31, 2017, the measurement period adjustments and the fair
value determined to be final as of June 30, 2018.
Estimate at December
31, 2017
Adjustments
Final Fair Value
$
57,384
$
— $
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities
Loans
Accrued interest receivable
Bank premises, furniture and equipment
Non-marketable equity securities
Other real estate owned
Intangible assets
Goodwill
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Deposits
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
Subordinated notes(1)
Total liabilities
Consideration
Market value of common stock issued
54,137
312,608
1,191
6,145
2,096
166
7,519
23,496
2,509
467,251
$
395,851
$
1,287
142
4,625
401,905
$
40,337
25,009
65,346
$
$
$
—
572
—
688
—
—
(1,705)
(215)
617
(43) $
(303) $
260
—
—
(43) $
— $
— $
— $
$
$
$
$
57,384
54,137
313,180
1,191
6,833
2,096
166
5,814
23,281
3,126
467,208
395,548
1,547
142
4,625
401,862
40,337
25,009
65,346
Cash paid
Total fair value of consideration
(1) The subordinated note was paid off in full on December 1, 2017, subsequent to closing.
$
$
F-53
Acquisition-related Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company incurred $335 of pre-tax merger and acquisition expenses related
to the Liberty acquisition. The Company incurred $960 of acquisition expenses related to the Liberty acquisition in 2017. Merger
and acquisition expenses are included in merger and acquisition expenses in the consolidated statements of income.
Acquired Loans and Purchased Credit Impaired Loans
Acquired loans were recorded at fair value based on a discounted cash flow valuation methodology that considers, among
other things, projected default rates, loss given defaults and recovery rates. No allowance for credit losses was carried over from
Liberty.
The Company has identified certain acquired loans as PCI. PCI loan identification considers payment history and past
due status, debt service coverage, loan grading, collateral values and other factors that may indicate deterioration of credit quality
since origination. Accretion of purchase discounts on PCI loans is based on estimated future cash flows, regardless of contractual
maturities, that include undiscounted expected principal and interest payments and use credit risk, interest rate and prepayment
risk models to incorporate management’s best estimate of current key assumptions such as default rates, loss severity and payment
speeds. Accretion of purchase discounts on acquired non-impaired loans will be recognized on a level-yield basis based on
contractual maturity of individual loans per ASC 310-20.
The following table discloses the fair value and contractual value of loans acquired from Liberty on December 1,
2017:
Real Estate
Commercial
Consumer
Total fair value
Contractual principal balance
PCI Loans
Other Acquired
Loans
Total Acquired
Loans
$
$
868
307
—
1,175
1,748
$
$
257,578
$
49,695
4,732
312,005
316,119
$
258,446
50,002
4,732
313,180
317,867
The following table presents additional information about PCI loans acquired from Liberty on December 1, 2017:
Contractually required principal and interest
Non-accretable difference
Cash flows expected to be collected
Accretable difference
Fair value of PCI loans
Intangible Assets
PCI Loans
2,316
711
1,605
430
1,175
$
$
$
The acquisition also resulted in a core deposit intangible of $5,814, which will be amortized on a straight line basis over
the estimated life of 10.0 years.
F-54
Pro Forma Information (unaudited)
The following table presents unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information for the years ended December 31,
2017 and 2016 as if the Sovereign and Liberty acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2016. The pro forma information includes
adjustments for interest income on loans acquired, depreciation expense on property acquired, amortization of intangibles arising
from the transaction, merger and acquisition costs incurred by the Company in 2017 to be reflected as incurred in 2016, merger
and acquisition costs incurred by Sovereign and Liberty prior to the acquisition close date and the related income tax effects. The
pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the transactions
been completed on the assumed date.
Net interest income
Net income available to common stockholders
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
$
$
102,440
$
22,270
$
0.98
0.96
98,701
26,984
1.55
1.53
The following net interest income and net income available to common stockholders for the Sovereign and Liberty
transactions are included in the Company’s operating results for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Net interest income
Net income available to common stockholders
25. Branch Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale
Year Ended December 31, 2017
$
14,825
4,615
On October 23, 2017, the Company entered into a Purchase and Assumption Agreement to sell certain assets and liabilities
associated with two branch locations in the Austin metropolitan market. On January 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of
these assets and liabilities to Horizon Bank, SSB (“Horizon”), resulting in a $33,557 cash settlement payment to Horizon during
the three months ended March 31, 2018, which included the repayment of a $1,000 deposit liability recorded within other liabilities
as of December 31, 2017, and the recognition of a $355 gain on the sale reported in other non-interest income for the year ended
December 31, 2018. The completion of this sale resulted in the Company exiting the Austin metropolitan market.
In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company ceased using one of its Dallas, Texas branch buildings. The associated building
and improvements were included in branch assets held for sale as of December 31, 2017. On August 6, 2018, the Company
completed the sale of the branch location to Texas Trust Credit Union, resulting in a $1,747 cash settlement during the three months
ended September 30, 2018, which included the recognition of a loss of $6 on the sale reported in other non-interest expenses.
F-55
The following table presents the assets and liabilities held for sale as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Loans
Accrued interest receivable
Bank premises, furniture and equipment
Intangible assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Deposits
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Deferred tax liability
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
Total liabilities
26. Parent Company Only Financial Statements
December 31,
2018
2017
— $
—
—
—
—
— $
334
26,313
63
5,118
1,724
33,552
— $
64,282
—
—
—
— $
2
327
16
64,627
$
$
$
$
The following balance sheets, statements of income and statements of cash flows for Veritex Holdings, Inc. should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.
Balance Sheet
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment in subsidiaries
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Other liabilities
Other borrowings
Total liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock
Common stock
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Unallocated employee stock ownership plan shares
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Treasury stock
Total stockholders’ equity
December 31,
2018
2017
$
$
$
40,474
$
506,902
940
46,724
459,654
2,267
548,316
$
508,645
987
$
16,691
17,678
3,027
16,689
19,716
—
243
449,427
83,968
—
(2,930)
(70)
530,638
—
241
445,517
44,627
(106)
(1,280)
(70)
488,929
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
548,316
$
508,645
F-56
Statements of Income
Interest income:
Other
Interest expense:
Interest on borrowings
Net interest expense
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits
Merger and acquisition expense
Other
Total noninterest expense
Loss before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed income of
subsidiaries
Income tax benefit
Loss before equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
Equity in undistributed income of bank
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
$
20
$
8
$
2
974
(954)
853
4,415
—
5,268
(6,222)
(713)
(5,509)
44,850
598
(590)
712
2,256
—
2,968
(3,558)
(730)
(2,828)
17,980
388
(386)
161
828
1
990
(1,376)
(480)
(896)
13,447
12,551
Net income
$
39,341
$
15,152
$
F-57
Statements of Cash Flows
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Amortization of debt costs
Equity in undistributed net income of Bank
Decrease (increase) in other assets
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net cash paid in Sovereign acquisition
Net cash paid in Liberty acquisition
Capital investment in subsidiary
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from sale of common stock in public offering
Redemption of preferred stock
Net change in other borrowings
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options
Proceeds from payments on ESOP loan
Offering costs paid in connection with acquisition
Dividends paid on preferred stock
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
$
39,341
$
15,152
$
12,551
2
(44,850)
2,226
(2,635)
(5,916)
—
—
—
—
2
—
—
454
109
(899)
—
(334)
(6,250)
46,724
45
(17,980)
3,523
1,353
2,093
(55,949)
(24,812)
—
(80,761)
56,681
(24,500)
(4,625)
175
109
(772)
(42)
27,026
(51,642)
98,366
$
40,474
$
46,724
$
8
(13,447)
(155)
270
(773)
—
—
(10,000)
(10,000)
94,518
—
—
—
109
—
—
94,627
83,854
14,512
98,366
F-58
27. Summary of Quarterly Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The following quarterly information is unaudited. However, in the opinion of management, the information reflects all
adjustments, which are necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations, for the periods presented.
2018
Fourth
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Second
Quarter
First
Quarter
$
37,774
$
37,818
$
34,555
$
9,487
28,287
1,364
4,027
17,538
3,587
8,642
29,176
3,057
2,510
18,246
1,448
6,931
27,624
1,504
2,592
16,169
2,350
9,825
$
8,935
$
10,193
$
34,087
4,985
29,102
678
2,781
17,306
3,511
10,388
$
0.41
0.40
$
0.37
0.36
$
0.42
0.42
0.43
0.42
2017
Second
Quarter
First
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter (1)
29,897
$
Third
Quarter (1)
22,279
$
4,147
25,750
2,529
2,298
15,035
7,227
3,257
—
3,150
19,129
752
1,977
12,522
2,650
5,182
42
$
14,307
$
1,931
12,376
943
1,766
7,782
1,802
3,615
—
3,257
$
5,140
$
3,615
$
13,069
1,816
11,253
890
1,535
7,450
1,350
3,098
—
3,098
$
0.14
0.14
$
0.26
0.25
$
0.24
0.23
0.20
0.20
$
$
Interest Income
Interest Expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Provision for income taxes
Net income available to common stockholders
Earnings per share:
Basic
Diluted
$
$
Interest Income
Interest Expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Provision for income taxes
Net income
Less income available to common stockholders
Net income available to common stockholders
Earnings per share:
Basic
Diluted
(1) These results include the addition of Sovereign upon acquisition during the third quarter.
F-59
28. Subsequent Events
Green Bancorp, Inc. Merger
On January 1, 2019 (“close date”), the Company completed its acquisition of Green Bancorp, Inc. (“Green”), the parent
holding company of Green Bank, N.A, a nationally chartered commercial bank headquartered in Houston, Texas with 21 full-
service branches in the Houston, Dallas and other markets. Under the terms of the definitive agreement for the acquisition, each
outstanding share of Green’s common stock and Green’s outstanding restricted stock units that accelerated vested at maximum
levels at the close date was converted into the right to receive 0.79 shares of the Company’s common stock, with cash paid in lieu
of fractional shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, Green’s options that accelerated vested at maximum levels on
the close date were exchanged for an option to purchase Veritex common stock at the same 0.79 conversion rate. This resulted in
approximately 29,533 shares of the Company’s common stock being issued in respect of outstanding shares of Green common
stock, approximately 523 shares of the Company’s common stock being issued for Green’s restricted stock units, approximately
1,085 of options to purchase Green common stock exchanged for options to purchase the Company’s common stock, a cash
payment of approximately $116 in respect of Green’s outstanding stock appreciation right awards and a cash payment of
approximately $10 in lieu of fractional shares. Additionally, certain executive officers of Green have entered into employment
agreements with Veritex, which provide for certain compensatory arrangements and severance entitlements upon an involuntary
termination following the closing date.
The Company’s primary reason for the transaction was to further solidify its market share in the Texas market. During
2018, the Company incurred approximately $4,865 of merger and acquisition expenses related to the transaction. Merger and
acquisition expenses are included in merger and acquisition expenses in the consolidated statements of income. The majority of
the merger and acquisition expenses for this transaction are expected to be recorded after the financial statements for the periods
covered by this report. Additional disclosures required by ASC 805 have been omitted from this report because the information
required for the disclosures, including the purchase price accounting fair value adjustments, are not available due to the close
proximity of the closing of the transaction with the date the accompanying consolidated financial statements were issued.
In addition, the consummation of the Green acquisition constituted a change in control of the Company under certain of
its compensation and incentive plans. All unvested stock options, restricted stock units and other equity awards under the Company’s
2010 Incentive Plan and the 2014 Omnibus Plan fully vested on January 1, 2019 and each participant under the Company’s ESOP
became fully vested in his or her account.
Declaration of Dividend
On January 28, 2019, the Company's Board of Directors declared the initiation of a regular quarterly cash dividend of
$0.125 per share of its outstanding common stock. The dividend was paid on February 21, 2019 to shareholders of record as of
February 7, 2019. The timing, declaration, amount and payment of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the Company’s
board of directors and will depend on various factors that the Company’s board of directors may deem relevant.
Stock Buyback Program
On January 28, 2019, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a stock buyback program (the "Stock Buyback
Program") pursuant to which the Company may, from time to time, purchase up to $50,000 of its outstanding common stock. The
shares may be repurchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time, depending upon market
conditions and other factors, and in accordance with applicable regulations of the SEC. The Stock Buyback Program expires on
December 31, 2019 and does not obligate the Company to purchase any shares. The Stock Buyback Program may be terminated
or amended by the Company’s Board of Directors at any time prior to its expiration.
F-60
Exhibit Index
Each exhibit marked with an asterisk (*) is filed or furnished with this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Each exhibit marked
with a “†” denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Exhibit
Number
Description
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated July 23, 2018, by and among Veritex Holdings, Inc., MustMS, Inc. and Green Bancorp, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 24, 2018)
3.1 Restated Certificate of Formation (with Amendments) of Veritex Holdings, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-198484) filed September 22, 2014)
3.2 Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of Veritex Holdings, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-198484) filed September 22, 2014)
4.1 Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-198484) filed September 29, 2014)
4.2 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on
Form S-1(Registration No. 333-198484) filed August 29, 2014)
4.3 Form of Senior Debt Indenture by and between Veritex Holdings, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, in its capacity as indenture trustee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-207934) filed
November 10, 2015)
4.4 Form of Subordinated Debt Indenture by and between Veritex Holdings, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, in its capacity as indenture
trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-207934)
filed November 10, 2015)
10.1† Change in Control Agreement dated June 18, 2012 by and among Veritex Community Bank, Veritex Holdings, Inc. and Noreen E. Skelly
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-198484) filed
August 29, 2014)
10.2† Veritex Holdings, Inc. First Amended 2010 Stock Option and Equity Incentive Plan (including form of stock option agreement and stock
award agreement) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-198484) filed August 29, 2014)
10.3† 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-198484) filed September 22, 2014)
10.4† Veritex Community Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan Adoption Agreement dated December 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-198484) filed August 29, 2014)
10.5 Form of 2013 Subordinated Promissory Note dated December 23, 2014 issued by Veritex Holdings, Inc. (including associated terms and
conditions) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-198484) filed August 29, 2014)
10.6† Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-198484) filed September 29, 2014)
10.7 Registration Rights Agreement dated September 11, 2014 among Veritex Holdings, Inc., SunTx Veritex Holdings, L.P. and WCM Parkway,
Ltd. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1(Registration No. 333-198484)
filed September 22, 2014)
10.8
Form of Voting Agreement dated December 14, 2016, by and among Veritex Holdings, Inc. and certain shareholders of Sovereign Bancshares,
Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 14, 2016)
10.9 Form of Director Support Agreement dated December 14, 2016, by and among Veritex Holdings, Inc. and non-employee directors of
Sovereign Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December
14, 2016)
10.10
10.11
10.12
Separation Agreement and Release dated July 23, 2018 among Veritex Community Bank, Veritex Holdings, Inc. and Manuel J. Mehos
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2019)
Executive Employment Agreement dated July 23, 2018 among Veritex Community Bank, Veritex Holdings, Inc. and Terry S. Earley
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2019)
Executive Employment Agreement dated July 23, 2018 among Veritex Community Bank, Veritex Holdings, Inc. and Geoffrey D. Greenwade
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2019)
21.1* Subsidiaries of Veritex Holdings, Inc.
23.1* Consent of Grant Thornton LLP
31.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2* Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2* Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101* The following materials from Veritex Holdings Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (Extensible
Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows,
and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-61
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
Date: February 27, 2019
Veritex Holdings, Inc.
By:
Name:
Title:
/s/ C. Malcolm Holland, III
C. Malcolm Holland, III
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons, on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name
/s/ C. Malcolm Holland, III
C. Malcolm Holland, III
Title
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date
February 27, 2019
/s/ Terry S. Earley
Terry S. Earley
/s/ Pat S. Bolin
Pat S. Bolin
/s/ William D. Ellis
William D. Ellis
/s/ Ned N. Fleming, III
Ned N. Fleming, III
/s/ Mark C. Griege
Mark C. Griege
/s/ Steven D. Lerner
Steven D. Lerner
/s/ Manuel J. Mehos
Manuel J. Mehos
/s/ Gregory B. Morrison
Gregory B. Morrison
/s/ John T. Sughrue
John T. Sughrue
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
February 27, 2019
February 27, 2019
February 27, 2019
February 27, 2019
February 27, 2019
February 27, 2019
February 27, 2019
February 27, 2019
February 27, 2019
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
S-1
Veritex Locations
HOUSTON LOAN OFFICE
777 Post Oak Blvd, Ste 700
Houston, TX 77056
SAN FELIPE BRANCH*
7500 San Felipe, Ste 125
Houston, TX 77063
PARK BRANCH
5049 W Park Blvd
Plano, TX 75093
ALEXIS BRANCH
14885 Preston Rd
Dallas, TX 75254
TURTLE CREEK BRANCH
3131 Turtle Creek Blvd, Ste 100
Dallas, TX 75219
UPTOWN BRANCH*
2408 Cedar Springs Rd
Dallas, TX 75201
MEMORIAL BRANCH*
5900 Memorial Dr, Ste 100
Houston, TX 77007
FRANKFORD BRANCH
17950 Preston Rd, Ste 100
Dallas, TX 75252
PRESTON CENTER BRANCH*
4029 Northwest Parkway
Dallas, TX 75225
KATY FREEWAY BRANCH*
9545 Katy Fwy, Ste 100
Houston, TX 77024
GARLAND BRANCH
622 Clara Barton Boulevard
Garland, TX 75042
WEST 7TH BRANCH
2800 W 7th St
Fort Worth, TX 76107
ADDISON BRANCH*
16771 Dallas Pkwy
Addison, TX 75001
THE WOODLANDS BRANCH*
1455 Research Forest Dr
Shenandoah, TX 77380
ROYAL BRANCH
10703 Preston Rd
Dallas, TX 75230
MERRICK BRANCH
2424 Merrick St
Fort Worth, TX 76107
RICHARDSON BRANCH*
1301 E Campbell Rd
Richardson, TX 75081
KINGWOOD BRANCH*
1102 Kingwood Dr
Kingwood, TX 77339
WESTCHESTER BRANCH
8214 Westchester Dr, Ste 100
Dallas, TX 75225
MATLOCK BRANCH
3800 Matlock Rd
Arlington, TX 76015
PLANO BRANCH*
5224 W. Plano Parkway
Plano, TX 75093
FRIENDSWOOD BRANCH*
102 West Parkwood
Friendswood, TX 77546
SMU BRANCH
6116 N Central Expy, Ste 100
Dallas, TX 75206
SOUTHLAKE BRANCH
2438 E Southlake Blvd
Southlake, TX 76092
MESQUITE BRANCH*
1438 Oates Dr
Mesquite, TX 75150
BAY AREA BRANCH*
2424 Bay Area Blvd
Houston, TX 77058
LAKEWOOD BRANCH
2101 Abrams Rd
Dallas, TX 75214
AIRPORT FREEWAY BRANCH
860 Airport Fwy, Ste 100
Hurst, TX 76054
HONEY GROVE BRANCH*
201 W Main St
Honey Grove, TX 75446
MEMORIAL MOTOR BANK*
8611 Memorial Drive
Houston, TX 77024
OAK LAWN BRANCH
2706 Oak Lawn Ave
Dallas, TX 75219
BELT LINE BRANCH
4300 N Belt Line Rd
Irving, TX 75038
DAVIS BRANCH
6330 Davis Blvd
North Richland Hills, TX 76180
FRITO LAY HQ BRANCH*
7701 Legacy Dr
Plano, TX 75024
TANGLEWOOD BRANCH*
5018 San Felipe, Suite D
Houston, TX 77056
HIGHWAY 26 BRANCH
7001 Boulevard 26, Ste 100
North Richland Hills, TX 76180
FORT WORTH LOAN OFFICE*
801 Cherry Street, Box 39
Fort Worth, TX 76102
CLEVELAND BRANCH*
908 E Houston St
Cleveland, TX 77327
MORTGAGE OFFICE
7001 Preston Rd, Ste 100
Dallas, TX 75205
HULEN BRANCH
3880 Hulen St, Ste 100
Fort Worth, TX 76107
GREENBRIAR BRANCH*
4000 Greenbriar
Houston, TX 77098
HARTLAND PLAZA BRANCH*
1717 West 6th Street, Suite 110
Austin, TX 78703
FRISCO BRANCH
1518 Legacy Dr, Ste 100
Frisco, TX 75034
HOUSTON SAN FELIPE
BRANCH
5111 San Felipe
Houston, TX 77056
HOUSTONIAN BRANCH*
109 North Post Oak Ln, Ste 100
Houston, TX 77024
YUM! BRANDS HQ BRANCH*
1900 Colonel Sanders Ln
Louisville, KY 40213
*Former Green Bank Locations
Shareholder Information
Corporate Address
8214 Westchester Dr, Ste 800 | Dallas, TX 75225
Annual Meeting
For information on the Veritex Holdings, Inc. 2019 Annual Shareholder
Meeting, please visit the Investor Relations section of our
website, veritexbank.com, under the About Us tab.
Transfer Agent For Common Stock
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust
17 Battery Pl, 8th Floor | New York, NY 10004
Independent Accountants
Grant Thornton LLP
1717 Main St, Ste 1800 | Dallas, TX 75201
Stock Listing
NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol VBTX
Investor Relations
Veritex Holdings, Inc.
8214 Westchester Dr, Ste 800 | Dallas, TX 75225
Attn. Susan Caudle | Tel: 972.349.6132
47 Locations | www.veritexbank.com
Member FDIC
This Annual Report includes industry and trade association data, forecasts and information that Veritex has prepared
based, in part, upon data, forecasts and information obtained from independent trade associations, industry publications
and surveys, government agencies and other information publicly available to Veritex, which information may be specific
to particular markets or geographic locations. Some data is also based on Veritex’s good faith estimates, which are derived
from management’s knowledge of the industry and independent sources. Industry publications, surveys and forecasts
generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Although
Veritex believes these sources are reliable, Veritex has not independently verified the information contained therein. While
Veritex is not aware of any misstatements regarding the industry data presented in this presentation, Veritex’s estimates
involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors. Similarly, Veritex believes that its
internal research is reliable, even though such research has not been verified by independent sources.
©2019 Veritex Community Bank