Verizon
Annual Report 2002

Plain-text annual report

Dorothy Wireless Data Consultant Mariano International Operations Progress: 2002 Annual Report Scott Database Manager Rudy Call Center Manager Johnna PBX Technician Yvette Residential Sales Domestic Telecom Largest provider of local, long distance, data and broadband services to customers in two-thirds of the top 100 markets in the U.S. — More than 30 million residential customers — 10.4 million long distance customers, third in the U.S. — 1.8 million DSL lines Domestic Wireless Premier wireless provider in U.S., with a network serving 49 of the top 50 markets — 32.5 million customers, up 10.5 percent in 2002 — Revenues of $19.3 billion, up nearly 11 percent — High-speed data network in all major markets Information Services Leading print and on-line directory publisher — 2,100 directories in U.S. and 13 countries — 156 million circulation worldwide — 57 million monthly searches on SuperPages.com International Strategic investments in wireless and wireline businesses in the Americas, Europe and the Pacific Rim — 3.2 million proportionate access lines — 8.7 million proportionate wireless subscribers — $861 million in income from unconsolidated businesses Financial Highlights 2002 REVENUES (billions) Domestic Telecom $ 41 61% Domestic Wireless $ 19 28% Information Services $ 4 6% International $ 3 5% Total $67 Billion EARNINGS PER SHARE* *before special items DIVIDENDS PER SHARE CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATIONS (billions) 2002 $3.05 2001 $3.00 2000 $2.91 2002 $1.54 2001 $1.54 2000 $1.54 2002 $22.1 2001 $19.8 2000 $15.8 The 2002 Annual Report is printed on non-glossy, recycled paper and is an example of Verizon’s commitment to sound environmental practices. Other initiatives include aggressive energy conservation, recycling of equipment and phone directories, and the innovative use of new technologies such as fuel cells for power generation. Our leadership on environmental issues earned Verizon the EPA’s Energy Star Corporate Partner of the Year Award for 2002. How do you make progress? Win a Nobel Prize? Earn a gold medal? Change the world? At Verizon, we believe progress is the sum of the little things we do every day to make life better for our customers and communities. Like listening to customers. Providing great service. Making communications simpler. Giving something back. Because we do what we do, a busy mother can order phone service over the Internet, even at 1 a.m. A Verizon employee volunteering his time and money to charity knows they’ll go twice as far because we match them dollar for dollar, hour for hour. And whether it’s by cell phone, computer or telephone, our customers know Verizon networks are the world’s most reliable way to make a connection. We may not be changing the world overnight. But by focusing on what we do best — and doing it better tomorrow than we did yesterday — we make progress every day. Strongest nationwide wireless network — Wall Street Journal Best long distance, heavy users — J.D. Power Number one on-line directory — Nielsen/NetRatings Top telecom for on-line service — Fortune Most respected communications brand in our service area —Corporate Brand Tracker 1 Fellow Shareowners: Ivan G. Seidenberg — THERE’S AN OLD ADAGE THAT STRONG COMPANIES GET STRONGER IN DIFFICULT TIMES. BY THAT MEASURE, VERIZON HAD A GOOD YEAR IN ONE OF THE MOST CHALLENGING PERIODS IN MEMORY FOR THE COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY. We began the year with a focus on execution, fiscal discipline and service and ended by meeting or exceeding our financial and operational targets. We began with a belief in the value of our core businesses and new technologies and ended with a solid track record of innovation, investment and growth. We began with a determination to leverage our unified brand and ended the year with Verizon firmly established as the leading brand for communications in our markets. And we began the year as we have every other year in our existence, with a rock-solid value system and ethical management team that sustained us through an extraordinarily difficult year for corporate America. In short, 2002 was a year of progress in our journey toward industry leadership — a journey that finds us stronger today, across virtually every dimension of our company, than we were one year ago. 2002 Financial Performance: Focused on Fundamentals In a contracting industry, Verizon’s earnings before special and non-recurring items grew 1.7 percent in 2002. We managed to hold revenues flat at $67 billion, offsetting the impact of the slow economy, increased competition and outdated regulation with continued double-digit revenue growth from Verizon Wireless and strong performance in long distance and broadband. Uncertain times require management to focus intensely on the factors we can control, which we did with good results in 2002. We improved our balance sheet by shaving more than $10 billion off our debt load, a reduction of almost 16 percent. In response to declining volumes in telecom, we reduced the size of our workforce. These and other cost-saving moves, along with contin- uing productivity improvements, resulted in significant gains in operating income and free cash flow. With a leaner cost structure and industry-leading results in the fourth quarter, we enter 2003 with a strong foundation and great momentum. We are obviously not satisfied with the flat revenue growth we experienced last year. But by focusing on the fundamentals, we essentially held our own in a year when most of the companies in our industry were shrinking. The same can be said for our stock performance (depicted on the chart on page 3). When you include dividends, Verizon’s total return to shareowners for 2002 was down more than 15 percent, reflecting the market’s general uncertainty about the impact of competition, technological change, regulation and the continuing recession on the communications industry. More broadly, however, Verizon outperformed the S&P Telecom Services Index, as well as the S&P 500 Index, indicating our relative strength in a difficult market. This is mixed news, at best, and demonstrates the need for us to show that we can translate our belief in the growth potential of communications into shareowner value. What is clear is the oper- ational strength of our core businesses and the power of our inte- grated business model. While we remain cautious about the eco- nomic environment for 2003, we believe the market will reward these strengths over the long term. 2002 Operating Results: Growth through Innovation Our operational performance in 2002 demonstrates our continued focus on growth, innovation and service. Despite increased com- petition, we added customers and grew share in several markets. Verizon Wireless ended the year with 32.5 million customers — by far the largest customer base in the country. Not only is this a more than 10 percent increase over 2001, it also represents prof- itable growth, with margins and revenue per subscriber going up. With 10.4 million long distance subscribers, we are now the third largest consumer long distance company in the marketplace and — sometime in the first half of 2003 — expect to be able to pro- vide all our customers with a full package of local and long distance services. We continued the aggressive transformation of our telecom business to a more data-centric, high-speed platform. We now have 1.8 million digital subscriber lines and enjoyed 9.2 percent growth in data transport revenues. We are becoming a premier e-business provider with our SuperPages.com on-line directory product and a full-service electronic portal in Verizon.com. And we focused our international investments on those businesses — mainly in the Americas and Canada — that have synergy with our domestic wireless, wireline and directory businesses. Going forward, our international portfolio will be a smaller, stronger set of companies, characterized by the same operational excellence that distinguishes our core businesses. We also showed we could do what infrastructure businesses like ours do: invest in and operate great networks and grow through innovation. We invested $12 billion in capital, much of it to upgrade our wireless and wireline networks with higher-speed capabilities. We were the first to offer a complete bundle of services for the consumer market, gaining more than half a million customers for our VeriationsSM packages that combine local, long distance, 2 2002 RELATIVE STOCK PERFORMANCE Verizon S&P500 Index S&P Telecom Svcs Index $47.46 $38.75 10% 0% -10% -20% -30% -40% -50% -60% 1/01/02 3/31/02 6/30/02 9/30/02 12/31/02 broadband and wireless services. With Enterprise Advance, we are bringing to market an integrated, managed suite of services for large business customers. Verizon Wireless continued its record of innovation by introducing new wireless data and downloadable applications. And Verizon Information Services is transforming its traditional directory business into one of the leading electronic commerce providers in the world. Through it all, we continue to focus on the essence of our business: delivering great service to customers. According to inter- nal and external metrics — from customer surveys to J. D. Power ratings — the quality of service went up in 2002, as it has every year since Verizon was formed. Our efforts in 2002 strengthened our competitive position, improved our cost structure, and made our already advanced net- works even more robust. We have the scale, scope and financial strength required to compete in this industry. And we are proving, year after year, that we have the right strategy for delivering the benefits of our assets to the marketplace. Commitment to Leadership Of course, as we saw in 2002, even sound business models can be undermined fatally if they are not based on a foundation of strong values and ethical management. Our Board of Directors, led by Chairman Chuck Lee, deserves special recognition for its steadfast ethical guidance and insistence on sound governance practices. So too does the Verizon leader- ship team for ensuring our adherence to a rigorous code of con- duct for all employees. (See “Straight Talk” on page 8 for a further discussion of these topics.) The Verizon leadership team is arguably the most experienced, diverse and proven in all of tele- com. They managed to do the right things the right way in 2002. Our employees deserve special mention, as well, for their dedication to our customers, their focus on results in a tumultuous year, and their can-do spirit in an age when too many people find it easier to make excuses than to make progress. The months ahead will put that resourcefulness to the test. Verizon has achieved a position of leadership in communications. We have assembled the assets and established a record of per- formance that others in our business have yet to match. Now we must do what leaders do — raise the bar for ourselves and the industry. Technology businesses create the future through innovation. For us — and, more important, for the American economy — that means broadband and wireless. We must continue to break down the regulatory barriers to investment in new technologies that will unleash a new era of productivity and growth across the entire technology sector. In the meantime, we are pushing forward with the next generation of services to ensure that Verizon’s customers — whether they come to us through wireless, telecom or SuperPages — will be the first to receive the benefits of a truly integrated broadband experience. The quest for leadership is a long-term game. Our challenge is to fight our way through all the doubts about the future of communications, continue to turn in superior operating perform- ance, and deliver the sustainable value creation that characterizes the truly great corporations. Fortunately, we love what we do. We believe in our business model, our technology and our people. We know that we have a great and vital role to play in revitalizing the communications indus- try and, with it, the technology engine of the economy. And we’re prepared to step up to the plate and do what we do best — invest, innovate and deliver great service — to reignite the market’s excite- ment about the possibilities of communications to change people’s lives for the better. Verizon’s journey to being one of America’s flagship companies will never be over. But as we showed in 2002 — and as we will demonstrate again in the years to come — we’re making progress every day. IVAN G. SEIDENBERG Chief Executive Officer A Note of Thanks Verizon gratefully acknowledges the service of four directors who are leaving our board this year. John Snow has joined the Bush Administration as U.S. Treasury Secretary. Edward Budd, Robert Daniell and Helene Kaplan will retire upon reaching the board’s mandatory retirement age. Their leadership, integrity and acumen have helped build not only Verizon’s assets but also our character. We also extend a special thank-you to Fred Salerno, who retired in 2002 as vice chairman and chief financial officer. His strategic vision and moral fiber are part of our foundation and constitute a lasting legacy to Verizon’s shareowners and employees. 3 — In the communications business, the foundation for innovation is a great network— or, in Verizon’s case, networks. We invested $12 billion in wireless and telecom networks in 2002: adding 400,000 miles of fiber-optic cable, extending DSL to 60 percent of our lines, and enhancing our wireless network with higher-speed data capabilities. The bigger challenge is putting the power of all this technology to work for customers—helping them make progress with products that save them time, money and aggravation. At Verizon, our goal is to be the market leader in delivering innovative, integrated communications solutions to customers at home, at work and on the go. 4 Innovation: Great companies transform themselves from within — building on their core strengths to create new products, services and markets. VERIZON CAN TURN YOUR HOME INTO A HIGH-SPEED DATA HUB, YOUR OFFICE INTO AN ENGINE OF PRODUCTIVITY, AND YOUR CELL PHONE, LAPTOP OR PDA INTO A PORTAL TO THE INTERNET. EVEN BETTER, WE CAN PUT IT ALL TOGETHER — ONE BUNDLE, ONE BILL, ONE TRUSTED SOURCE FOR ALL YOUR COMMUNICATIONS NEEDS. At home At work Anywhere you go — Verizon DSL provides high-speed — With Enterprise Advance, large — With America’s ChoiceSM, Verizon Internet access over a dedicated line that lets you click and connect in an instant. And with Home Networking, all your computers and laptops can share the same great connection. — Customers logged on to our e-commerce portal, Verizon.com, more than 60 million times in 2002 to pay bills, order service, change their address — any time, day or night, at the touch of a button. — Put it all together with VeriationsSM — our convenient bundles of local calling plans, long distance, wireless, advanced calling features and DSL, all available on one bill. business customers get managed, end-to-end communications services that take advantage of Verizon’s national scale, high-speed data networks, and unrivalled network operating experience. — No directory in the world links more buyers and sellers than Verizon SuperPages. Our on-line version, SuperPages.com, has more than 100,000 advertisers, lists more than 15 million businesses, and has more unique visitors than Yahoo yellow pages. — After a successful trial in Boston, Verizon will bring the benefits of fast, economical data communications to small businesses in other cities by using wireless fidelity, or “Wi-Fi,” technology to establish high-speed data networks in offices and stores. Wireless’s simple, nationwide price plan, you can call from anywhere on our network without roaming or long distance charges. More important, you know your call will be carried on a network whose quality is checked by real-life Test Men and Women, who cover 100,000 miles every month to make sure your call goes through. — Express Network, our high-speed wireless data network, makes the Internet accessible wherever you are, over your laptop or personal digital assistant. — Only Verizon Wireless lets you Get It NowSM — download applications to your wireless phone that let you read a restaurant review, get directions, see if your plane is on time, even play golf with Tiger Woods. 5 — The more people connected to a network, the more valuable it is to those who use it. That’s the idea that underlies our business. It’s also the philosophy behind our commitment to our communities. Our aim is to mobilize and empower the millions of individuals and organizations—employees, retirees, customers and non- profits—that comprise the Verizon community, putting the tools for progress into the hands of people who can make a difference on the local level. We promote employee volunteerism through matching gift programs that recognize contributions of money and time. And we are helping build a strong and lasting infrastructure for progress by making sure people have the fundamental skills—like literacy and access to technology—to succeed in the digital era. Commitment: Verizon defines “commitment” the same way we have for a hundred years: developing our people, giving back to our communities, staying true to our values. 6 Diversity Community involvement Literacy For Verizon, diversity is a business imperative. Our employees’ diverse experiences, cultures and perspectives help us serve our multicultural markets more effectively. — Fortune magazine recognized Verizon’s commitment to an inclusive workplace by naming us one of the “50 Best Companies for Minorities” in 2002. Verizon Wireless was also cited as one of the top 100 companies in America by Working Mother magazine. — We promote economic empowerment by buying more than $1.8 billion in goods and services from businesses owned by minorities, women, people with disabilities and Vietnam veterans. We also use minority-owned investment firms to help manage our pension funds. — From multilingual call centers to the nation’s only Spanish-language on-line directory — SuperPages.com en Español — we are making Verizon easier to do business with for the more than 40 million Hispanics in the United States and Puerto Rico. Our approach to philanthropy is unique not so much for what we do, but for how we do it: We’re on-line, bilingual, community-based and largely volunteer. — The Verizon Foundation invested $75 million in communities nationwide in 2002, making it one of the top ten corporate foundations in the U.S. — Verizon Wireless puts the power of wireless to work to help victims of domestic violence through its HopelineSM program. In the past two years, Hopeline has donated more than 7,200 wireless phones, airtime, and more than $1 million to support domestic violence shelters and prevention programs. — Through a unique approach that puts the power to serve communities in the hands of employees, Verizon Volunteers matches employee gifts of money and time to qualified nonprofit organizations, anywhere in the U.S. Employees and retirees responded in 2002 by donating more than $15 million and logging more than half a million hours of community service. Verizon is dedicated to being America’s Literacy Champion through our signature program, Verizon Reads. We encourage collaboration among literacy organizations to improve the lives of the millions of Americans with low literacy skills. — Our annual book drive, Season’s Readings, brightened the lives of thousands of people over the holidays. Verizon employees donated nearly 120,000 books and pledged to spend some 50,000 hours reading to kids. — Whether it’s the strength of New York Giant Tiki Barber, the soul of singer Al Jarreau, or the stamina of blind mountain climber Erik Weihenmayer, Verizon’s celebrity Literacy Champions use their gifts to raise awareness and inspire hope about literacy issues. — SuperPages.com uses the Internet to bring the power of reading and technology to families and educators. Enlighten Me is an on-line resource with book reviews, tutorials, games and a search engine that puts a world of resources at your fingertips. 7 Straight Talk: From Ivan Seidenberg WHAT ASSURANCES CAN YOU GIVE INVESTORS THAT THE ETHICAL PROBLEMS THAT HAVE PLAGUED SOME OTHER COMPANIES WILL NOT AFFECT VERIZON? Verizon’s core values of integrity and respect are a fundamental part of our culture. We have one of the most rigorous codes of conduct in corporate America, which applies to all employees worldwide. We also publish standards of conduct for our suppli- ers. We train and certify all our employees on their understanding of compliance and ethics issues. And we operate several confidential ethics hotlines that employees can use, 24x7, to report any questionable conduct. (For a look at Verizon’s code of conduct, see “About Verizon” on our website, www.verizon.com.) WHAT ARE THE CHECKS AND BALANCES IN YOUR FINANCIAL REPORTING PROCESS? Investors can be confident that Verizon follows all generally accepted accounting principles, and that our financial results accurately and fairly present the financial condition of the company. Our CFO, Doreen Toben, and I personally certify our results after a thorough review process that involves all our business units and thousands of people, across, up and down our organization. From an auditing standpoint, we are scrutinized in a number of ways, by at least three sets of eyes. Our independent auditors, Ernst & Young, examine our financial results. Our internal auditing team audits our management controls and processes. And both sets of auditors report on their activities to the Audit and Finance Committee of the board. By the way, in selecting Ernst & Young, we deliberately chose an auditing firm that had not worked for either of our predecessor companies, ensuring ourselves an objective look at our company when it was formed. ARE YOU DOING ANYTHING DIFFERENTLY THAN YOU HAVE IN THE PAST AS A RESULT OF NEW OR PROPOSED CHANGES IN REQUIRE- MENTS PERTAINING TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE? We conducted a formal review of our board governance guide- lines and practices and are satisfied that they are fundamentally sound. We determined that our board structure and practices were already in line with most of the new requirements. We made some changes to our corporate governance guidelines, including even more rigorous independence standards for directors. We have also made some changes in our financial reporting to pro- 8 vide better and more understandable financial information to shareowners. For example, we decided to expense employee stock options granted after January 1, 2003 and to communicate the impact we expect reduced pension income will have on our 2003 results – steps designed to make our results more transparent to investors. (A copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines can be found on our investor website.) SHOULD VERIZON’S LARGE DEFINED-BENEFIT PENSION PLAN BE A CONCERN FOR INVESTORS, GIVEN THE SIGNIFICANT FUNDING THAT SOME OTHER COMPANIES HAVE HAD TO PROVIDE FOR THEIR PLANS? Actually, we have several different pension plans, a majority of which are adequately funded. Based on the funded status of the plans at the end of 2002, there will be no significant cash contributions required through 2003. Our pension funds consist of a well-diversified, balanced portfolio of assets that has performed reasonably well in spite of the downturn in the market. We expect our pension assets will continue to be sufficient to cover our obligations to retirees. HOW SHOULD INVESTORS THINK ABOUT YOUR INVESTMENT WRITE-DOWNS IN 2002? We certainly have made some investments that didn’t work out. Some turned out not to be a strategic fit, some suffered from a bad economic or political climate, and some, frankly, were based on growth assumptions that didn’t materialize. If you look at our record over time, you’d find that we’ve gained more than we’ve lost from strategic investments, but clearly we’re not immune from the problems that have beset telecom investments over the last few years. The difference is, we didn’t build Verizon on a foundation of false assumptions. The biggest investments we’ve made have been the mergers that formed a company with the best collection of assets in the communications business. Our bet-your-company moves have worked, and we’re confident they will produce true long-term shareowner value. IS VERIZON’S DIVIDEND STABLE – AND, IF SO, WILL IT GO UP ANY TIME SOON? Our dividend is very stable. Our strong operating businesses generate sufficient cash not only to fund our dividends, but also a significant capital investment program. Looking ahead, our first priority for free cash flow is to continue to pay down debt, as we did in 2002. If the economy improves and we continue to generate strong cash flow growth, we will have the flexibility to consider raising the dividend in the future. AS OF YEAR-END 2002, MANY COMPANIES HAD TAKEN CAUTIOUS, WAIT-AND-SEE OUTLOOKS. HOW DOES VERIZON APPROACH THE FUTURE? WHERE DO YOU SEE THE COMPANY IN FIVE YEARS? We approach the future with confidence. We know that there are challenges ahead, but we are transforming our business to meet the changing marketplace. Our immediate goal is to widen the gap between Verizon and other companies in the telecommu- nications business. Our longer-term goal is more ambitious. It has always been our core corporate goal to create the most respected brand in communications. Our aspiration over the next five years is to create the most respected brand. Period. Financial Contents Selected Financial Data Management’s Discussion and Analysis Report of Management Report of Independent Auditors Consolidated Statements of Income Consolidated Balance Sheets Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareowners’ Investment Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Board of Directors Officers and Leadership Investor Information 10 11 35 35 36 37 38 39 40 68 68 Inside Back Cover 9 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA Results of Operations Operating revenues Operating income Income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change Per common share – basic Per common share – diluted Net income Net income available to common shareowners Per common share – basic Per common share – diluted Cash dividends declared per common share Financial Position Total assets Long-term debt Employee benefit obligations Minority interest, including a portion subject to redemption requirements Shareowners’ investment VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 2002 2001 (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 1998 1999 2000 $ 67,625 14,997 $ 67,190 11,532 $ 64,707 16,758 $ 58,194 15,953 $ 57,075 11,756 4,584 1.67 1.67 4,079 4,079 1.49 1.49 1.54 590 .22 .22 389 389 .14 .14 1.54 10,810 3.98 3.95 11,797 11,787 4.34 4.31 1.54 8,296 3.03 2.98 8,260 8,260 3.02 2.97 1.54 $ 167,468 44,791 15,390 $ 170,795 45,657 11,898 $ 164,735 42,491 12,543 $ 112,830 32,419 13,744 $ 24,141 32,616 22,149 32,539 21,830 34,578 1,900 26,376 5,326 1.94 1.92 4,980 4,948 1.81 1.79 1.54 98,164 33,064 14,788 2,490 21,435 • Significant events affecting our historical earnings trends in 2000 through 2002 are described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition. • 1999 data includes a net gain on the sale of assets, merger-related costs and other special and non-recurring items. • 1998 data includes retirement incentive costs, merger-related costs and other special and non-recurring items. 10 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION OVERVIEW CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Verizon Communications Inc. is one of the world’s leading providers of communications services. Verizon companies are the largest providers of wireline and wireless communications in the United States, with 135.8 million access line equivalents and 32.5 million wireless customers. Verizon is also the largest directory publisher in the world. With more than $67 billion in annual revenues and 229,500 employees, Verizon’s global presence extends to 32 countries in the Americas, Europe, Asia and the Pacific. We have four reportable segments, which we operate and manage as strategic business units: Domestic Telecom, Domestic Wireless, International and Information Services. Domestic Telecom includes local, long distance and other telecommunication services. Domestic Wireless products and services include wireless voice and data serv- ices, paging services and equipment sales. International operations include wireline and wireless communications operations and invest- ments in the Americas, Europe, Asia and the Pacific. Information Services consists of our domestic and international publishing businesses, and electronic SuperPages.com® directories, as well as includes website creation and other electronic commerce services. including print SuperPages® In this section, we discuss our overall results of operations and high- light special and non-recurring items. In the following section, we review the performance of our four reportable segments. We exclude the effects of the special and non-recurring items from the segments’ results of operations since management does not consider them in assessing segment performance, due primarily to their non-recurring and/or non-operational nature. We believe that this presentation will assist readers in better understanding our results of operations and trends from period to period. This section on consolidated results of operations carries forward the segment results, which exclude the special and non-recurring items, and highlights and describes those items separately to ensure consistency of presentation in this section and the “Segment Results of Operations” section. The special and non-recurring items include operating results through the sale date of 1.27 million non-strategic access lines sold in 2002, 1.6 million non-strategic access lines sold during 2000 and the con- solidated results of Genuity Inc. through June 30, 2000, which are not included in segment results of operations to enhance comparability. In addition, consolidated operating results include several other events and transactions that are highlighted because of their non-recurring and/or non-operational nature. See “Special and Non-Recurring Items” for additional discussion of these items. The significant items impacting Verizon’s consolidated revenues, consolidated operating expenses and consolidated net income are summarized below and described in additional detail in the “Segment Results of Operations,” “Special and Non-Recurring Items” and “Other Consolidated Results” sections. Consolidated Revenues Years Ended December 31, 2002 2001 % Change Domestic Telecom Domestic Wireless International Information Services Corporate & Other Special and Non-Recurring Items Consolidated Revenues nm – Not meaningful $ $ 40,712 19,260 2,962 4,287 (219) 623 67,625 $ $ 42,081 17,393 2,337 4,313 69 997 67,190 (3.3)% 10.7 26.7 (0.6) nm (37.5) 0.6 2001 42,081 17,393 2,337 4,313 69 997 67,190 $ $ (dollars in millions) % Change 2000 $ $ 42,322 14,236 1,976 4,144 (276) 2,305 64,707 (0.6)% 22.2 18.3 4.1 nm (56.7) 3.8 2002 Compared to 2001 Domestic Telecom’s 2002 revenues were lower than 2001 by $1,369 million. Local service revenues declined $1,167 million, or 5.4% in 2002 largely due to lower demand and usage of our basic local wire- line services and mandated intrastate price reductions. Our network access revenues increased $327 million, or 2.5% in 2002 mainly as a result of higher customer demand for data transport services (prima- rily special access services and digital subscriber lines, or DSL). Long distance service revenues increased $100 million, or 3.3% in 2002 primarily as a result of revenue growth from our interLATA long dis- tance services offered throughout the region, partially offset by the effects of competition and toll calling discount packages and product bundling offers of our intraLATA toll services. In 2002, revenues from other services declined $629 million, or 13.7% substantially due to lower customer premises equipment and supply sales to some major customers, lower volumes at some of our non-regulated businesses due to the slowing economy and a decline in public telephone rev- enues as more customers substituted wireless communications for pay telephone services. Domestic Wireless’s revenues were higher by $1,867 million in 2002, largely due to customer additions and higher revenue per customer per month. Our Domestic Wireless segment ended 2002 with 32.5 million customers, an increase of 10.5% over year-end 2001 and average revenue per customer per month grew by 1.1% to $48.35 in 2002. 11 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED Revenues earned by International grew by $625 million in 2002 pri- marily due to the consolidation of Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc. (TELPRI) partially offset by the deconsolidation of CTI Holdings, S.A. (CTI) in 2002. Adjusting 2001 for the consolidation of TELPRI and the deconsolidation of CTI to be comparable with 2002, revenues generated by our international businesses declined by $210 million, or 6.6% in 2002 due primarily to the weak economies and increased competition in our Latin America markets as well as reduced software sales. Lower special and non-recurring items in 2002 of $374 million are the result of the sales of wireline access lines in the third quarter of 2002, compared to a full year of results of operations for those lines in 2001. 2001 Compared to 2000 Domestic Telecom ended 2001 with a decline in revenues of $241 million compared to 2000. In 2001, local service revenues declined $138 million, or 0.6% due to the effects of lower demand and usage of our basic local wireline services and mandated intrastate price reductions. Our network access revenues grew $270 million, or 2.1% in 2001 due mainly to higher customer demand, primarily for special access services (including DSL). Long distance service revenues declined $41 million, or 1.3% in 2001 primarily due to competition and the effects of toll calling discount packages and product bundling offers of our intraLATA toll services, largely offset by revenue growth from our interLATA long distance services. Revenues from other services declined $332 million, or 6.7% in 2001 principally as a result of lower sales of customer premises equipment, a decline in public telephone revenues as more customers substituted wireless communications for pay telephone services, and lower billing and collection revenues reflecting the take-back of these services by interexchange carriers. Revenues earned by Domestic Wireless in 2001 grew by $3,157 mil- lion. By including the revenues of the properties of the Verizon Wireless joint venture and excluding the impact of wireless overlap properties in 2000 on a basis comparable with 2001, revenues were $2,030 million, or 13.2%, higher than 2000. On this comparable basis, revenue growth was largely attributable to customer additions and slightly higher revenue per customer per month. Our domestic wireless customer base grew to 29.4 million customers in 2001, com- pared to 26.8 million customers in 2000, an increase of nearly 10%. Revenues earned by International grew by $361 million in 2001, pri- marily due to an increase in wireless revenues resulting from an increase in wireless subscribers of consolidated subsidiaries. Revenues from our Information Services segment increased $169 million in 2001. This increase was due primarily to growth in directory advertising revenues and extension revenues, continued growth of our Internet directory service, SuperPages.com®, and increased rev- enue from a 2001 acquisition. Special and non-recurring items include the revenues associated with significant operations sold, primarily the wireline access lines in 2002 and 2000 as well as revenues of Genuity reported prior to the decon- solidation of Genuity on June 30, 2000, and represented a reduction of consolidated revenues in 2001 of $1,308 million. Consolidated Operating Expenses Consolidated operating expenses include operations and support expense, depreciation and amortization and sales of assets, net. Years Ended December 31, 2002 2001 % Change Domestic Telecom Domestic Wireless International Information Services Corporate & Other Special and Non-Recurring Items Consolidated Operating Expenses nm – Not meaningful $ $ 31,730 15,620 2,355 2,173 (707) 1,457 52,628 $ $ 32,847 15,088 2,044 2,040 (651) 4,290 55,658 (3.4)% 3.5 15.2 6.5 8.6 (66.0) (5.4) 2001 32,847 15,088 2,044 2,040 (651) 4,290 55,658 $ $ (dollars in millions) % Change 2000 $ $ 32,750 12,457 1,714 2,100 (584) (488) 47,949 0.3% 21.1 19.3 (2.9) 11.5 nm 16.1 2002 Compared to 2001 Domestic Telecom’s operations and support expenses decreased in 2002 by $1,302 million, or 5.5% principally due to reduced spending for materials and contracted services, driven by lower capital expen- ditures, strong cost control management, business integration activities and achievement of merger synergies. Lower overtime for installation and maintenance activity principally as a result of reduced volumes at our dispatch and call centers and lower employee costs associated with declining workforce levels also con- tributed to the decline in operating costs. In addition, lower cost of sales at our customer premises equipment and supply business driven by declining business volumes contributed to the 2002 cost reductions. These cost reductions were partially offset by higher costs associated with our growth businesses such as data and long distance services, salary and wage increases, higher employee medical costs and higher uncollectible accounts receivable for com- petitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) and other wholesale customers. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense included the effect of growth in depreciable telephone plant and increased software amortization costs. These factors were offset, in part, by the effect of lower rates of depreciation. Operations and support expenses at Domestic Wireless increased in 2002 by $948 million, or 8.3% due primarily to increased advertising and selling expenses related to an increase in gross retail customer additions in 2002 compared to 2001, as well as increased salary and wage expense in customer care and sales channels. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased in 2002 by $416 million, or 11.2% as a result of a reduction of amortization expense from the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 12 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” effective January 1, 2002, which requires that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets no longer be amortized. This decrease was partially offset by increased depreciation expense related to the increase in depreciable assets related to an increased asset base. International’s operations and support expenses increased by $201 million, or 12.4% in 2002 primarily due to the consolidation of TELPRI partially offset by the deconsolidation of CTI in 2002. Adjusting 2001 to be comparable with 2002, operations and support expense decreased $190 million, or 9.4% in 2002 reflecting lower variable costs associated with reduced sales volumes in Latin America and credits related to the settlement of a contract dispute in 2002. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $110 million, or 26.1% in 2002 primarily due to the consolidation of TELPRI partially offset by the deconsolidation of CTI in 2002. Adjusting 2001 to be comparable with 2002, depreciation and amortization expense decreased $3 million, or 0.6% in 2002. Consolidated operating expenses in 2002 were favorably impacted by special and non-recurring items including the pretax gains on sales, net of $2,747 million, primarily from the non-strategic access line sales, compared to exit costs of $350 million in 2001, lower tran- sition costs of $529 million compared to 2001 and lower operating expenses of $172 million related to the sales of wireline access lines in the third quarter of 2002. This benefit is partially offset by higher severance, pension and benefit charges of $355 million and other special and non-recurring items of $610 million in 2002. Other spe- cial and non-recurring items are primarily comprised of asset impairment charges. 2001 Compared to 2000 Domestic Telecom’s operations and support expenses declined in 2001 by $601 million, or 2.5% as a result of strong cost containment measures, merger-related savings and other cost reductions. Operating expenses included increased costs associated with our growth businesses such as long distance and data services. Also included in 2001 operating expenses is a pretax charge of $285 mil- lion ($172 million after-tax, or $.06 per diluted share) related to losses, and service disruption and restoration costs, net of insurance recov- ery, associated with the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (also see “Segment Results of Operations-Domestic Telecom”). Verizon’s insurance policies are limited to losses of $1 billion for each occur- rence and include a deductible of $1 million. The cost and insurance recovery were recorded in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 01-10, “Accounting for the Impact of the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.” Depreciation and amortiza- tion expense increased by $698 million, or 8.2%, in 2001 principally due to growth in depreciable telephone plant and increased software amortization costs. These factors were partially offset by the effect of lower rates of depreciation. Domestic Wireless’s operations and support expenses increased by $1,816 million, or 19.0% in 2001. By including the expenses of the properties of the Verizon Wireless joint venture in 2000 on a basis comparable with 2001, operations and support expenses were $1,186 million, or 11.6% higher than 2000. Higher costs were attrib- utable to the growth in the subscriber base as well as the continuing migration of analog customers to digital. Depreciation and amortiza- tion expense increased by $815 million, or 28.2% in 2001. Adjusting for the joint venture in a manner similar to operations and support expenses above, depreciation and amortization was $336 million, or 10.0% higher than 2000. Capital expenditures for our cellular network increased in 2001 to support increased demand in all markets. Operations and support expenses of International increased by $263 million, or 19.4% in 2001. The higher costs in 2001 were primarily generated by the Global Solutions Inc. start-up and its continued expansion throughout 2001. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $67 million, or 18.9% in 2001 due to the capital expen- ditures necessary to support the growth in cellular customers. The special and non-recurring items include operating expenses associated with operations sold, primarily the wireline access lines in 2002 and 2000 as well as Genuity’s operating expenses reported prior to the deconsolidation of Genuity on June 30, 2000 and other special and non-recurring items, and represented a reduction of con- solidated operating expenses in 2001 of $1,411 million. Consolidated operating expenses in 2001 also included several other special and non-recurring items. Transition costs related to the Bell Atlantic Corporation-GTE Corporation merger and the formation of the Verizon Wireless joint venture were $1,039 million ($578 million after taxes and minority interest, or $.21 per diluted share) in 2001, compared to $694 million ($316 million after taxes and minority inter- est, or $.12 per diluted share) in 2000. In addition, we recognized net losses in operations related to sales of assets, impairments of assets held for sale and other charges of $350 million ($226 million after-tax, or $.08 per diluted share) in 2001, compared to net gains related to sales of assets and impairments of assets held for sale of $3,793 mil- lion ($1,987 million after-tax, or $.73 per diluted share). Also in 2001, we recorded a special charge of $1,596 million ($984 million after-tax, or $.36 per diluted share) primarily associated with employee sever- ance costs and related pension enhancements. In 2000, we recorded pension settlement gains of $911 million ($564 million after-tax, or $.21 per diluted share). Those gains relate to settlements of pension obligations for some former GTE employees. Also in 2001, we recorded a charge of $672 million ($663 million after-tax, or $.24 per diluted share) primarily relating to our cellular subsidiary in Argentina, given the status of the Argentinean economy, the devaluation of the Argentinean peso as well as future economic prospects, including a worsening of the recession. Other charges and special and non- recurring items in 2001 and 2000 include asset impairments and investment write-offs. 13 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED Consolidated Net Income Years Ended December 31, 2002 2001 % Change Domestic Telecom Domestic Wireless International Information Services Corporate & Other Special and Non-Recurring Items Consolidated Net Income nm – Not meaningful $ $ 4,387 966 1,047 1,281 682 (4,284) 4,079 $ $ 4,551 537 958 1,352 792 (7,801) 389 (3.6)% 79.9 9.3 (5.3) (13.9) nm nm 2001 4,551 537 958 1,352 792 (7,801) 389 $ $ (dollars in millions) % Change 2000 $ $ 4,839 444 733 1,238 708 3,835 11,797 (6.0)% 20.9 30.7 9.2 11.9 nm (96.7) 2002 Compared to 2001 The significant items affecting net income in 2002 compared to 2001 include the impact, after taxes and minority interest, of changes in revenues and operating expenses previously described and special and non-recurring items recorded in non-operating expense and income accounts. These special and non-recurring items recorded in 2002 include after-tax losses on unconsolidated investments of $5,139 million ($1.87 per diluted share), primarily related to our investments in Genuity, Compañia Anónima Nacional Teléfonos de Venezuela (CANTV) and TELUS Corporation. We determined that market value declines in these investments were considered other than temporary. These losses were partially offset by tax benefits of $2,104 million ($.77 per diluted share) pertaining to current and prior year investment impairments and an after-tax gain on the sale of an international investment of $229 million ($.08 per diluted share). In addition, 2002 includes an after-tax charge of $496 million ($.18 per diluted share) associated with the cumulative effect of adopting SFAS No. 142. Similar items in results of operations for 2001 include the recogni- tion of pretax losses totaling $5,937 million ($4,858 million after-tax, or $1.78 per diluted share) primarily relating to our investments in Genuity, Cable & Wireless plc (C&W), NTL Incorporated (NTL) and Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc. (MFN). We determined that market value declines in these investments were considered other than temporary. Substantially all of this total charge was recorded in Income (Loss) from Unconsolidated Businesses. Results of opera- tions in 2001 also include an after-tax charge of $182 million ($.07 per diluted share) associated with the cumulative effect of adopting new accounting for derivative financial instruments and a charge of $182 million ($179 million after taxes and minority interest, or $.07 per diluted share) related to the mark-to-market of derivative finan- cial instruments. International’s income from unconsolidated businesses decreased by $58 million, or 6.3% in 2002. Adjusting 2001 for the consolidation of TELPRI and the deconsolidation of CTI, income from unconsolidated businesses increased $107 million, or 14.2% in 2002. This increase primarily reflects the 2002 cessation of recording CTI’s operating losses and gains on sales of equity investments. Partially offsetting these increases was the impact of fluctuations of the Venezuelan bolivar on the results of CANTV in 2002. 2001 Compared to 2000 Included in results of operations for 2001 is the recognition of pretax losses totaling $5,937 million ($4,858 million after-tax, or $1.78 per diluted share) primarily relating to our investments in Genuity, C&W, 14 NTL and MFN. We determined that market value declines in these investments were considered other than temporary. Substantially all of this total charge was recorded (Loss) from Unconsolidated Businesses. In 2000, we recorded a non-cash pretax gain of $3,088 million ($1,941 million after-tax, or $.71 per diluted share) in Income (Loss) From Unconsolidated Businesses in connec- tion with the restructuring of Cable & Wireless Communications plc (CWC). In connection with this restructuring, we received shares of C&W and NTL. Income in International’s income from unconsolidated businesses increased by $247 million, or 36.8% in 2001. This increase was primarily due to improved operational growth at Vodafone Omnitel N.V. (Omnitel) and CANTV. In 2000, we recorded a gain on a mark-to-market adjustment of $664 million ($431 million after-tax, or $.16 per diluted share) related to our notes which were exchangeable into shares of C&W and NTL. During the second half of 2000, we completed the sale of several overlapping wireless properties resulting in a total pretax gain of $1,724 million ($1,039 million after-tax, or $.38 per diluted share). Since the sales were required by a consent decree and occurred after the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger, the gains on sales were recorded net of taxes as Extraordinary Items. Results of operations in 2001 also include an after-tax charge of $182 million ($.07 per diluted share) associated with the cumulative effect of adopting new accounting for derivative financial instruments and a charge of $182 million ($179 million after taxes and minority interest, or $.07 per diluted share) related to the mark-to-market of derivative financial instruments. We adopted the provisions of new accounting rules on revenue recognition in 2000. Our 2000 results include the ini- tial impact of adoption recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change of $40 million after-tax ($.01 per diluted share). Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Income, net of expenses related to Verizon’s pension and other postretirement plans, before special and non-recurring items, con- tributed $971 million ($.35 per diluted share) to Verizon’s net income in 2002. Similar amounts were recorded in 2001 and 2000. However, as of December 31, 2002, Verizon changed key employee benefit plan assumptions in response to current conditions in the securities markets and medical and prescription drug costs trends. The expected rate of return on pension plan assets has been changed from 9.25% in 2002 to 8.50% in 2003 and the expected rate of return on other postretirement benefit plan assets has been changed from 9.10% in 2002 to 8.50% in 2003. The discount rate assumption has been low- MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED ered from 7.25% in 2002 to 6.75% in 2003 and the medical cost trend rate assumption has been increased from 10.00% in 2002 to 11.00% in 2003. The overall impact of these assumption changes, combined with the impact of lower than expected actual asset returns over the past three years, is expected to be a reduction of pension income, net of other postretirement benefit expense, of $.30 to $.32 per diluted share in 2003. In addition, we anticipate reporting a declining level of earnings from pensions and other postretirement benefits for the following two to three years. SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS We measure and evaluate our reportable segments based on seg- ment income. This segment income excludes unallocated corporate expenses and other adjustments arising during each period. The other adjustments include transactions that the chief operating deci- sion makers exclude in assessing business unit performance due primarily to their non-operational and/or non-recurring nature. Although such transactions are excluded from business segment results, they are included in reported consolidated earnings. We pre- viously highlighted the more significant of these transactions in the “Consolidated Results of Operations” section. Gains and losses that are not individually significant are included in all segment results, since these items are included in the chief operating decision makers’ assessment of unit performance. These are mostly contained in International and Information Services since they actively manage investment portfolios. Effective January 1, 2003, our Global Solutions subsidiary was transferred from our International segment to, and consolidated with, our Domestic Telecom segment. The transfer of Global Solutions’ revenues and costs of operations will not be significant to the results of operations of Domestic Telecom or International. See the “International” section for additional information about Global Solutions’ impact on the International segment’s year-over- year comparisons. Further information about our segments can be found in Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements. Domestic Telecom Domestic Telecom provides local telephone services, including voice and data transport, enhanced and custom calling features, network access, directory assistance, private lines and public telephones in 29 states and the District of Columbia. As discussed earlier under “Consolidated Results of Operations,” we recently sold wireline prop- erties representing approximately 1.27 million access lines or 2% of the total Domestic Telecom switched access lines in service. We also sold approximately 1.6 million access lines in 2000. For compa- rability purposes, the results of operations discussed in this section exclude the properties that have been sold. This segment also pro- vides long distance services, customer premises equipment distribution, data solutions and systems integration, billing and col- lections, Internet access services and inventory management services. Highlights Domestic Telecom’s revenue growth rates in both years were pres- sured by several factors including the weakened U.S. economy and rate reductions mandated by regulators. The effects of the depressed economy, particularly in 2002, slowed demand for basic wireline and other services. In addition, Domestic Telecom continues to be affected by competition and technology substitution, as more customers choose wireless and Internet services in place of some basic wireline services. Despite these challenges, our data transport and long distance busi- nesses continued to show solid demand and revenue growth. Data transport revenues, which include our high-bandwidth, packet- switched and special access services, as well as DSL services, grew in both 2002 and 2001 due to strong customer demand for high- capacity, high-speed digital services. Long distance revenues gained in both years due primarily to new subscriber growth result- ing from the introduction of long distance services in a number of states throughout our region. Verizon is now the nation’s third largest provider of consumer long distance service, with more than half of its 10.4 million long distance customers in the former Bell Atlantic territory. Domestic Telecom’s operations and support expenses declined in 2002 and 2001 as a result of strong cost containment measures, merger-related savings and other cost reductions. Operating expenses in both years included increased entry costs associated with our growth businesses such as long distance and data services. These entry costs include customer acquisition expenses associated with the launch of long distance in many states and costs related to mar- keting, distribution and service installation of our DSL service. Costs in 2001 also included expenses related to the events of September 11, 2001 (see “Consolidated Results of Operations”). Depreciation and amortization expense increased as a result of growth in depre- ciable telephone plant and increased software amortization costs, partially offset by lower rates of depreciation for some telephone plant assets. Additional financial information about Domestic Telecom’s results of operations for 2002, 2001 and 2000 follows: Operating Revenues Years Ended December 31, Local services Network access services Long distance services Other services 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 $ 20,271 $ 21,438 $ 21,576 12,698 12,968 3,111 3,070 4,937 4,605 $ 40,712 $ 42,081 $ 42,322 13,295 3,170 3,976 Local Services Local service revenues are earned by our telephone operations from the provision of local exchange, local private line, wire maintenance, voice messaging and value-added services. Value-added services are a family of services that expand the utilization of the network, including products such as Caller ID, Call Waiting and Return Call. The provision of local exchange services not only includes retail rev- enue but also includes local wholesale revenues from unbundled network elements (UNEs), interconnection revenues from CLECs, wireless interconnection revenues and some data transport revenues. Local service revenues declined $1,167 million, or 5.4% in 2002 and $138 million, or 0.6% in 2001, largely due to lower demand and usage of our basic local wireline services and mandated intrastate price reductions. Our switched access lines in service declined 3.7% 15 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED from December 31, 2001 to December 31, 2002 and declined 2.3% from December 31, 2000 to December 31, 2001, primarily reflecting the impact of the economic slowdown and competition for some local services. Technology substitution has also affected local service revenue growth in both years, as indicated by lower demand for res- idential access lines of 2.8% from 2001 to 2002 and 1.4% from 2000 to 2001. A primary contributor to the decline in residential access lines is a decrease in additional lines, with second lines in service of 5.3 million, 5.9 million and 6.2 million at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. At the same time, basic business access lines have declined 5.2% from 2001 to 2002 and 3.9% from 2000 to 2001, primarily reflecting the continued weakness in the economy and a shift to high-speed, high-volume special access lines. These factors were partially offset in both years by higher payments received from CLECs for interconnection of their networks with our network and by increased sales of packaged wireline services as a result of expanded new products and pricing plans. Sales of pack- ages of wireline services increased by approximately 22% in 2002 over 2001 and 48% in 2001 over 2000. Today, more than 20% of our consumer customer base subscribes to a package, compared to 16% in 2001. Nearly 570,000 customers subscribe to the Verizon “Veriations” package plans that were introduced in the second half of 2002. These plans bundle local services, long distance, wireless and Internet access in a discounted bundle available on one bill. Our ONE-BILL service, which provides Verizon local, long distance and wireless charges on a single monthly bill, is now available in 20 of the 29 states where Verizon provides wireline services. Network Access Services Network access services revenues are earned from end-user sub- scribers and long distance and other competing carriers who use our local exchange facilities to provide usage services to their customers. Switched access revenues are derived from fixed and usage-based charges paid by carriers for access to our local network. Special access revenues originate from carriers and end-users that buy ded- icated local exchange capacity to support their private networks. End-user access revenues are earned from our customers and from resellers who purchase dial-tone services. Our network access services revenues increased $327 million, or 2.5% in 2002 and $270 million, or 2.1% in 2001. This growth was mainly attributable to higher customer demand for data transport services (primarily special access services and DSL) that grew 9.2% in 2002 and 19.3% in 2001, compared to prior years. Special access revenue growth reflects strong demand in the business market for high-capacity, high-speed digital services. Voice-grade equivalents (switched access lines and data circuits) grew 4.5% in 2002 and 13.7% in 2001 compared to the prior year, as more customers chose digital services. We added approximately 600,000 new DSL lines in 2002, for a total of 1.79 million lines in service at December 31, 2002, a more than 50% year-over-year increase. Currently, 62% of our total access lines qualify for DSL service and 57% of households are cov- ered by DSL service. At the same time, customer service levels continue to show improvement through a reduction in the DSL order provisioning interval from more than fifteen days in 2001 to five days by the end of 2002, and we have nearly reached a 100% self installa- tion rate by our customers. At December 31, 2001, DSL lines in service were 1.19 million, compared to 540,000 DSL lines in service 16 at December 31, 2000. In addition to volume-related growth, network access revenues in the fourth quarter of 2002 also included the favor- able effect of a state regulatory decision in Michigan. These factors in 2002 and 2001 were partially offset by price reduc- tions associated with federal and state price cap filings and other regulatory decisions and declining switched minutes of use (MOUs). Switched MOUs declined by 8.4% in 2002 and 1.0% in 2001. State rate reductions on access services were approximately $72 million in 2002, $165 million in 2001 and $285 million in 2000. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates the rates that we charge long distance carriers and end-user subscribers for interstate access services. We are required to file new access rates with the FCC each year. In July 2000, we implemented the Coalition for Affordable Local and Long Distance Services (CALLS) plan. Interstate price reductions on access services were approximately $48 million in 2002, $300 million in 2001 and $520 million in 2000. Revenue growth in both years was also negatively affected by the slowing economy, as reflected by declines in minutes of use from carriers and CLECs of 8.4% in 2002 and 1.0% in 2001, compared to prior years. See “Other Factors That May Affect Future Results” for additional information on FCC rulemakings concerning federal access rates, universal service and unbundling of network elements. WorldCom Inc., including its affiliates, purchases dedicated local exchange capacity from us to support its private networks and we also charge WorldCom for access to our local network. In addition, we sell local wholesale interconnection services and provide billing and collection services to WorldCom. We purchase long distance and related services from WorldCom. On July 21, 2002, WorldCom filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. During 2002, we recorded rev- enues earned from the provision of primarily network access services to WorldCom of approximately $2.1 billion. If WorldCom terminates contracts with us for the provision of services, our operating rev- enues would be lower in future periods. Lower revenues as a result of canceling contracts for the provision of services could be partially off- set, in some cases, by the migration of customers on the terminated facilities to Verizon or other carriers who purchase capacity and/or interconnection services from Verizon. At December 31, 2002, accounts receivable from WorldCom, net of a provision for uncol- lectibles, was approximately $300 million. We continue to closely monitor our collections on WorldCom account balances. WorldCom is current with respect to its post-bankruptcy obligations. We believe we are adequately reserved for the potential risk of non-payment of pre-bankruptcy receivables from WorldCom. Long Distance Services Long distance service revenues include both intraLATA toll services and interLATA long distance voice and data services. Long distance service revenues increased $100 million, or 3.3% in 2002 primarily as a result of revenue growth from our interLATA long distance services offered throughout the region. We now offer long distance service in 47 states and to more than 90% of our local tele- phone customers across the country. In 2002, we began offering long distance services in Rhode Island, Vermont, Maine, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Delaware and Virginia. At December 31, 2002, we had a total of 10.4 million long distance customers nationwide, representing an increase of nearly 3.0 million long distance customers year-over- MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED year, or nearly 40% customer growth and 21% interLATA long dis- tance service revenue growth from last year. In March 2003, the FCC must act on our application to offer long distance in Maryland, West Virginia and the District of Columbia. After the FCC approves the application for the three remaining regions, we will have the ability to offer long distance services nationwide. Long distance service revenue growth in 2002 was partially offset by the effects of competition and toll calling discount packages and product bundling offers of our intraLATA toll services. However, we are experiencing net win-backs of customers for intraLATA toll serv- ices in the states where interLATA long distance service has been introduced. Technology substitution and lower access line growth due to the slowing economy also affected long distance service rev- enue growth. Long distance service revenues declined $41 million, or 1.3% in 2001 primarily due to competition and the effects of toll calling discount packages and product bundling offers of our intraLATA toll services. These reductions were largely offset by revenue growth from our interLATA long distance services, including significant customer win- backs resulting from the introduction of interLATA long distance services in New York in 2000 and in Massachusetts, Connecticut and Pennsylvania in 2001. At December 31, 2001, we had 7.4 million long distance customers nationwide, compared to 4.7 million long dis- tance customers at December 31, 2000. See also “Other Factors That May Affect Future Results” for a dis- cussion of the interLATA long distance market in our region. Other Services Our other services include such services as billing and collections for long distance carriers, public (coin) telephone and customer premises equipment and supply sales. Other services revenues also include services provided by our non-regulated subsidiaries such as inventory management and purchasing, and data solutions and systems integration businesses. In 2002, revenues from other services declined $629 million, or 13.7%. This decline was substantially due to lower customer premises equipment and supply sales to some major customers, lower volumes at some of our non-regulated businesses due to the slowing economy and a decline in public telephone revenues as more customers substituted wireless communications for pay tele- phone services. In 2001, revenues from other services declined $332 million, or 6.7% principally as a result of lower sales of customer premises equipment, a decline in public telephone revenues due to wireless substitution, and lower billing and collection revenues reflecting the take-back of these services by interexchange carriers. Lower data solutions and systems integration revenues due to the slowing economy and the effect of closing our CLEC operation further contributed to the rev- enue decline in 2001. These revenue reductions were partially offset by higher revenues from other non-regulated services. Operating Expenses Years Ended December 31, Operations and support Depreciation and amortization 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 $ 22,297 $ 23,599 $ 24,200 8,550 $ 31,730 $ 32,847 $ 32,750 9,433 9,248 Operations and Support Operations and support expenses, which consist of employee costs and other operating expenses, decreased by $1,302 million, or 5.5% in 2002 principally due to lower costs at our domestic telephone operations, business integration activities and achievement of merger synergies. In 2002, these reductions were mainly attributable to reduced spending for materials and contracted services, driven by lower capital expenditures and strong cost control management. Lower overtime for installation and maintenance activity principally as a result of reduced volumes at our dispatch and call centers and lower employee costs associated with declining workforce levels also contributed to the decline in operating costs. At December 31, 2002, we reduced our full-time headcount by approximately 18,000 employees, or 10.1%, from the prior year. At year-end 2002, we had reduced the installation and repair overtime hours per employee per week by 23.8% from a year ago. Lower cost of sales at our customer premises equipment and supply business driven by declining busi- ness volumes also contributed to the cost reductions in 2002. Favorable adjustments in 2002 included updates to ongoing expense estimates as a result of specific regulatory decisions by the FCC and state regulatory commissions in New York and other states. These cost reductions were partially offset by higher costs associated with our growth businesses such as data and long distance services. Increased costs associated with salary and wage increases for employees, increased health care costs and higher uncollectible accounts receivable for CLECs and other wholesale customers fur- ther offset cost reductions in 2002. Operations and support expenses decreased by $601 million, or 2.5% in 2001 due mainly to lower overtime for repair and mainte- nance activity at our domestic telephone operations principally as a result of reduced volumes at our dispatch and call centers and lower employee costs associated with declining workforce levels. At December 31, 2001, we reduced our full-time headcount by approximately 16,900 employees, or 8.6% from the prior year. Operating costs in 2001 had also decreased due to business inte- gration activities and merger-related synergies. Other effective cost containment measures, including lower spending by non-strategic businesses and closing our CLEC operation, also contributed to cost reductions in 2001. Cost reductions in 2001 were partially offset by additional charges related to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 (see “Consolidated Results of Operations” section) and by higher costs associated with our growth businesses such as long distance and data services. Increased costs associated with uncollectible accounts receivable and higher employee benefit costs further offset cost reductions in 2001. The increase in employee benefit costs in 2001 was largely due to increased health care costs driven by infla- tion, higher savings plan costs and changes in some plan provisions. These factors were partially offset by favorable pension plan income, including gain amortization. Depreciation and Amortization The increase in depreciation and amortization expense in both 2002 and 2001 included the effect of growth in depreciable telephone plant and increased software amortization costs. These factors were offset, in part, by the effect of lower rates of depreciation. 17 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED Segment Income Years Ended December 31, 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 Segment Income $ 4,387 $ 4,551 $ 4,839 Segment income decreased by $164 million, or 3.6% from 2001 and decreased by $288 million, or 6.0% from 2000 primarily as a result of the after-tax impact of operating revenues and operating expenses, described above. Special and non-recurring items of $197 million, $1,187 million, and $(1,218) million, after-tax, affected the Domestic Telecom segment in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Special and non-recurring items in all three years include the results of operations of the access lines sold. Special and non-recurring items in 2002 pri- marily related to gains on sales of assets, net, offset by employee severance and termination benefit costs and merger-related costs. Special and non-recurring items in 2001 primarily related to merger- related costs and severance and retirement enhancement costs, and special and non-recurring items in 2000 pertained to gains on sales of assets, net, pension settlement gains and merger-related costs. Domestic Wireless Our Domestic Wireless segment provides wireless voice and data services, paging services and equipment sales. This segment prima- rily represents the operations of the Verizon Wireless joint venture. Verizon Wireless was formed in April 2000 through the combination of our wireless properties with the U.S. properties and paging assets of Vodafone Group plc (Vodafone), including the consolidation of PrimeCo Personal Communications, L.P. (PrimeCo). Verizon owns a 55% interest in the joint venture and Vodafone owns the remaining 45%. The 2002 and 2001 financial results included in the table below reflect the combined results of Verizon Wireless. The period prior to the formation of Verizon Wireless is reported on a historical basis, and therefore, does not reflect the contribution of the Vodafone properties and the consolidation of PrimeCo. In addition, the financial results of several overlap properties, that were subsequently sold, were included in Domestic Wireless’s results through June 30, 2000. Operating Revenues Years Ended December 31, 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 Wireless sales and services $ 19,260 $ 17,393 $ 14,236 Domestic Wireless’s revenues grew by $1,867 million, or 10.7% in 2002. This revenue growth was largely attributable to customer addi- tions and higher revenue per customer per month. Our Domestic Wireless segment ended 2002 with 32.5 million customers, an increase of 10.5% over year-end 2001, which included 485,000 sub- scribers added as a result of acquisitions during 2002, primarily from the acquisition of Price Communications Corp.’s (Price) wireless operations in Alabama, Florida, Georgia and South Carolina. Total churn decreased to 2.3% in 2002, compared to 2.5% in 2001. Average revenue per customer per month grew by 1.1% to $48.35 in 2002, compared to 2001, primarily due to increased access revenue per subscriber. Retail customers, who generally produce higher serv- ice revenue than wholesale customers, comprised approximately 97% of the subscriber base at the end of 2002, compared to 93% at the end of 2001. 18 Approximately 28.6 million, or almost 88%, of Verizon Wireless cus- tomers now subscribe to CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access) digital services, and generate more than 97% of our busy-hour usage, compared to 93% at year-end 2001. Domestic Wireless’s revenues grew by $3,157 million, or 22.2% in 2001. By including the revenues of the properties of the wireless joint venture and excluding the impact of wireless overlap properties on a basis comparable with 2001, revenues were $2,030 million, or 13.2% higher than 2000. On this comparable basis, revenue growth was largely attributable to customer additions and slightly higher revenue per customer per month. At year-end 2001, customers totaled approximately 29.4 million, an increase of 9.8% over year-end 2000. Operating Expenses Years Ended December 31, Operations and support Depreciation and amortization 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 $ 12,327 $ 11,379 $ 9,563 2,894 $ 15,620 $ 15,088 $ 12,457 3,293 3,709 Operations and Support Operations and support expenses, which represent employee costs and other operating expenses, increased by $948 million, or 8.3% in 2002 and $1,816 million, or 19.0% in 2001. Higher costs were attrib- utable to increased advertising and selling expenses related to an increase in gross retail customer additions in 2002 compared to 2001, as well as increased salary and wage expense in customer care and sales channels. The increased costs in 2001 were attributable to the growth in the subscriber base described above, as well as the migration of analog customers to digital. Depreciation and Amortization Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $416 million, or 11.2% in 2002 and increased by $815 million, or 28.2% in 2001. The decrease in 2002 was primarily attributable to a reduction of amorti- zation expense from the adoption of SFAS No. 142, effective January 1, 2002, which requires that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets no longer be amortized. This decrease was partially offset by increased depreciation expense related to the increase in depreciable assets related to an increased asset base. The 2001 increase was mainly attributable to increased capital expenditures to support the increasing demand for wireless services. Segment Income Years Ended December 31, 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 Segment Income $ 966 $ 537 $ 444 Segment income increased by $429 million, or 79.9% in 2002 and by $93 million, or 20.9% in 2001, primarily as a result of the after-tax impact of operating revenues and operating expenses described above as well as minority interest and interest expense. Special and non-recurring items of $57 million, $107 million and $(410) million, after-tax, affected the Domestic Wireless segment in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Special and non-recurring items in 2002 pertained to merger-related costs and employee severance costs. Special and non-recurring items in 2001 primarily related to merger-related costs and special and non-recurring items in 2000 pertained to gains on sales, net and merger-related costs. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED Increases in minority interest in 2002 and 2001 were principally due to the increased income of the wireless joint venture and the significant minority interest attributable to Vodafone beginning in April 2000. International Our International segment includes international wireline and wireless telecommunication operations and investments in the Americas, Europe, Asia and the Pacific. Our consolidated international invest- ments as of December 31, 2002 included Grupo Iusacell S.A. de C.V. (Iusacell) in Mexico, CODETEL C. por A. (Codetel) in the Dominican Republic, TELPRI in Puerto Rico, Micronesian Telecommunications Corporation in the Northern Mariana Islands and Global Solutions. Those investments in which we have less than a controlling interest are accounted for by either the cost or equity method. On January 25, 2002, we exercised our option to purchase an addi- tional 12% of TELPRI common stock from the government of Puerto Rico. We now hold 52% of TELPRI stock, up from 40% held at December 31, 2001. As a result of gaining control over TELPRI, we changed the accounting for this investment from the equity method to full consolidation, effective January 1, 2002. Accordingly, TELPRI’s net results are reported as a component of Income (Loss) from Unconsolidated Businesses for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, while 2002 results of operations are included in consolidated revenues and expenses in the tables below. On March 28, 2002, we transferred 5.5 million of our shares in CTI to an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of Verizon and subsequently transferred ownership of that subsidiary to a newly created trust for CTI employees. This decreased our ownership percentage in CTI from 65% to 48%. We also reduced our representation on CTI’s Board of Directors from five of nine members to four of nine (subse- quently reduced to one of five members). As a result of these actions that surrender control of CTI, we changed our method of accounting for this investment from consolidation to the equity method. On June 3, 2002, as a result of an option exercised by Telfone (BVI) Limited (Telfone), a CTI shareholder, Verizon acquired approximately 5.3 mil- lion additional CTI shares. Also on June 3, 2002, we transferred ownership of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Verizon that held 5.4 mil- lion CTI shares to a second independent trust leaving us with an approximately 48% non-controlling interest in CTI. In addition, during the first quarter of 2002, we wrote our remaining investment in CTI, including those shares we were contractually committed to purchase under the Telfone option, down to zero (see “Special and Non- Recurring Items”). Since we have no other future commitments or plans to fund CTI’s operations and we have written our investment down to zero, in accordance with the accounting rules for equity method investments, we are no longer recording operating income or losses related to CTI’s operations. CTI’s results of operations are reported in revenues and expenses for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, while 2002 revenues and expenses are not included in the tables below. Operating Revenues Years Ended December 31, 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 Operating Revenues $ 2,962 $ 2,337 $ 1,976 Revenues generated by our international businesses grew by $625 million, or 26.7% in 2002 and by $361 million, or 18.3% in 2001. The 2002 growth is primarily due to the consolidation of TELPRI partially offset by the deconsolidation of CTI in 2002. The 2001 growth was primarily due to an increase in wireless subscribers of consolidated subsidiaries and revenues generated by the Global Solutions net- work, which began its commercial operations in the first quarter of 2001. Adjusting 2001 and 2000 to be comparable with 2002, rev- enues generated by our international businesses declined by $210 million, or 6.6% in 2002 and increased $283 million, or 9.8% in 2001. The 2002 decrease in adjusted revenues is due to the weak economies and increased competition in our Latin America markets as well as reduced software sales. These decreases were offset in part by higher revenues generated by the Global Solutions network. Operating Expenses Years Ended December 31, Operations and support Depreciation and amortization 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 $ 1,823 $ 1,622 $ 1,359 355 $ 2,355 $ 2,044 $ 1,714 532 422 Operations and Support Operations and support expenses, which include employee costs and other operating expenses, increased by $201 million, or 12.4% in 2002 and by $263 million, or 19.4% in 2001. The 2002 increase is pri- marily due to the consolidation of TELPRI partially offset by the deconsolidation of CTI in 2002. The higher costs in 2001 were prima- rily generated by the Global Solutions start-up and its continued expansion throughout 2001 as well as higher costs from CTI’s Buenos Aires wireless operations. Adjusting 2001 and 2000 to be comparable with 2002, operations and support expense decreased $190 million, or 9.4% in 2002 and increased $255 million, or 14.5% in 2001. The decrease in expense in 2002 reflects lower variable costs associated with reduced sales volumes in Latin America and credits related to a one-time contractual settlement of $66 million in 2002, offset in part by higher variable costs associated with the increased revenues and costs of Global Solutions’ operations. The increase in expenses in 2001 is primarily due to the start-up of Global Solutions’ operations and expansion throughout 2001. Depreciation and Amortization Depreciation and amortization expense increased $110 million, or 26.1% in 2002 and by $67 million, or 18.9% in 2001. The 2002 growth is primarily due to the consolidation of TELPRI partially offset by the deconsolidation of CTI in 2002. The 2001 increase was attrib- utable to the capital expenditures necessary to support the growth in wireless subscribers. Adjusting 2001 and 2000 to be comparable with 2002, depreciation and amortization expense decreased $3 million, or 0.6% in 2002 and $2 million, or 0.4% in 2001. The 2002 decrease is driven by the January 1, 2002 cessation of the amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives as required by SFAS No. 142, offset by ongoing network capital expenditures nec- essary to service the increased subscriber base. Segment Income Years Ended December 31, 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 Segment Income $ 1,047 $ 958 $ 733 19 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED Segment income increased by $89 million, or 9.3% in 2002 and by $225 million, or 30.7% in 2001. The 2002 increase in segment income was primarily the result of the after-tax impact of operating revenues and operating expenses described above, offset by a decrease in income from unconsolidated businesses and the impact on Iusacell of fluctuations of the Mexican peso. directory is distributed. This segment has operations principally in North America, Europe and Latin America. Operating Revenues Years Ended December 31, 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 Operating Revenues $ 4,287 $ 4,313 $ 4,144 Income from unconsolidated businesses decreased by $58 million, or 6.3% in 2002 and increased $247 million, or 36.8% in 2001. Adjusting 2001 and 2000 for the consolidation of TELPRI and the deconsolidation of CTI, income from unconsolidated businesses increased $107 million, or 14.2% in 2002 and $249 million, or 49.3% in 2001. The 2002 increase reflects the 2002 cessation of recording CTI’s operating losses, gains on sales of equity investments, includ- ing a portion of our interest in Taiwan Cellular Corporation (TCC), and the discontinuation of amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives of our equity investments, as required by SFAS No. 142. Partially offsetting these increases was the impact of Venezuelan bolivar fluctuations on the results of CANTV in 2002 and ceasing recording TCC equity income after selling a portion of our interest and beginning to account for our remaining interest using the cost method. The increase in 2001 was primarily due to improved operational growth at Omnitel and CANTV. The 2002 impact of the Mexican peso fluctuations was a loss of $136 million, before minority interest benefit of $83 million. An after-tax gain of $32 million on the sale of a portion of our interest in TCC was recorded in 2002 as well as a small gain on the sale of STET Hellas Telecommunications SA. 2002 also benefited from the 12% increase in our ownership of TELPRI. The 2001 increase in segment income was primarily the result of the after-tax impact of operating revenues and operating expenses described above, increases in income from unconsolidated businesses and the impact on Iusacell of fluctuations of the Mexican peso. The 2001 impact of the Mexican peso fluctuations was income of $62 million, before minority interest expense of $38 million. After-tax gains of $64 million and $30 million on sales of our shares in QuébecTel to TELUS were recorded in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Special and non-recurring items of $2,383 million, $2,953 million and $(1,814) million, after-tax, affected the International segment in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Special and non-recurring items in 2002 included losses on CANTV, TELUS, CTI and other investments and the cumulative effect of adopting SFAS No. 142, partially offset by the gain on a sale of an interest in Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Limited (TCNZ). Special and non-recurring items in 2001 primarily related to losses on securities and a loss on CTI, and special and non-recurring items in 2000 pertained to the CWC restructuring gain, partially offset by merger-related costs. Information Services Our Information Services segment consists of our domestic and international publishing businesses, including print SuperPages® and electronic SuperPages.com® directories, as well as includes website creation and other electronic commerce services. Our direc- tory business uses the publication date method for recognizing revenues. Under that method, costs and advertising revenues asso- ciated with the publication of a directory are recognized when the 20 Operating revenues from our Information Services segment are essentially flat, decreasing $26 million, or 0.6% in 2002. The 2002 revenue decrease was due primarily to the impacts of lower affiliate and extension revenues and the elimination of directory revenues related to wireline property sales. The decrease was partially offset by sales performance growth and increased revenue from the August 2001 acquisition of TELUS’ advertising services business in Canada. Verizon’s domestic Internet directory service, SuperPages.com®, revenue grew 63.7% over 2001 as Information Services continues to be the dominant leader in online directory services. Operating revenues from our Information Services segment increased $169 million, or 4.1% in 2001. The 2001 revenue increase was due primarily to growth in directory advertising revenues and extension of publications, continued growth of SuperPages.com®, and increased revenue from the TELUS acquisition in August 2001, partially offset by reductions in affiliate revenues. Operating Expenses Years Ended December 31, Operations and support Depreciation and amortization 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 $ 2,099 $ 1,961 $ 2,026 74 $ 2,173 $ 2,040 $ 2,100 74 79 In 2002, total operating expenses increased $133 million, or 6.5% primarily due to increased selling costs, a small asset sale gain recorded in 2001 and higher uncollectible accounts receivable. In 2001, total operating expenses decreased $60 million, or 2.9% pri- marily due to the execution of cost reduction initiatives, merger synergies and a small asset sale gain recorded in 2001. Segment Income Years Ended December 31, 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 Segment Income $ 1,281 $ 1,352 $ 1,238 Segment income decreased by $71 million, or 5.3% from 2001 and increased $114 million, or 9.2% from 2000 as a result of the after-tax impact of operating revenues and operating expenses described above. Special and non-recurring items of $92 million, $81 million and $140 million, after-tax, affected the Information Services seg- ment in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Special and non-recurring items in 2002 included merger-related costs, costs associated with Domestic Telecom access line sales and severance costs. Special and non-recurring items in 2001 and 2000 pertained to merger-related costs. SPECIAL AND NON-RECURRING ITEMS Special and non-recurring items generally represent revenues and gains as well as expenses and losses that are non-operational and/or non-recurring in nature. Several of these special and non-recurring items include impairment losses. These impairment losses were determined in accordance with our policy of comparing the fair value MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED of the asset with its carrying value. The fair value is determined by quoted market prices or by estimates of future cash flows. These special and non-recurring items are not considered in assess- ing operational performance, either at the segment level or for the consolidated company. However, they are included in our reported results. This section provides a detailed description of these special and non-recurring items. Sales of Assets, Net During 2002, we recognized net gains in operations related to sales of assets and other charges. During 2001, we recognized net losses in operations related to sales of assets, impairments of assets held for sale and other charges. During 2000, we recognized net gains related to sales of assets and impairments of assets held for sale. These net gains and losses are summarized as follows: Years Ended December 31, Wireline property sales Wireless overlap property sales Other, net 2002 Pretax After-tax 2001 Pretax After-tax (dollars in millions) 2000 Pretax After-tax $ 2,527 $ 1,550 $ – $ – $ 3,051 $ 1,856 – 220 1,156 (1,025) $ 2,747 $ 1,666 $ (350) $ (226) $ 3,793 $ 1,987 1,922 (1,180) (60) (166) (92) (258) – 116 As required, gains on sales of wireless overlap properties that occurred prior to the closing of the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger are included in operating income and in the table above. Gains on sales of significant wireless overlap properties that occurred after the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger are classified as extraordinary items. See “Extraordinary Items” below for gains on sales of significant wireless overlap properties subsequent to the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger. Wireline Property Sales In October 2001, we agreed to sell all 675,000 of our switched access lines in Alabama and Missouri to CenturyTel Inc. (CenturyTel) and 600,000 of our switched access lines in Kentucky to ALLTEL Corporation (ALLTEL). During the third quarter of 2002, we completed the sales of these access lines for $4,059 million in cash proceeds ($191 million of which was received in 2001). We recorded a pretax gain of $2,527 million ($1,550 million after-tax, or $.56 per diluted share). For the years 2002, 2001 and 2000, the operating revenues of the access lines sold were $623 million, $997 million and $1,021 mil- lion, respectively. For the years 2002, 2001 and 2000, operating expenses of the access lines sold were $241 million, $413 million and $539 million, respectively. During 1998, GTE committed to sell approximately 1.6 million non- strategic domestic access lines. During 2000, access line sales generated combined cash proceeds of approximately $4,903 million and $125 million in convertible preferred stock. The pretax gain on the sales was $3,051 million ($1,856 million after-tax, or $.68 per diluted share). The operating revenues and expenses of the access lines sold in 2000 were $766 million and $253 million, respectively. Wireless Overlap Property Sales A U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) consent decree issued on December 6, 1999 required GTE Wireless, Bell Atlantic Mobile, Vodafone and PrimeCo to resolve a number of wireless market over- laps in order to complete the wireless joint venture and the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger. As a result, during April and June 2000 we completed transactions with ALLTEL that provided for the exchange of former Bell Atlantic Mobile and GTE Wireless markets for several of ALLTEL’s wireless markets. These exchanges were accounted for as purchase business combinations and resulted in combined pre- tax gains of $1,922 million ($1,156 million after-tax, or $.42 per diluted share). During 2001, we recorded a pretax gain of $80 million ($48 million after-tax, or $.02 per diluted share) on the sale of the Cincinnati wireless market and a pretax loss of $172 million ($108 million after- tax, or $.04 per diluted share) related to the sale of the Chicago wireless market. Other Transactions During 2002, we recorded a net pretax gain of $220 million ($116 mil- lion after-tax, or $.04 per diluted share), primarily resulting from a pretax gain on the sale of TSI Telecommunication Services Inc. (TSI) of $466 million ($275 million after-tax, or $.10 per diluted share), par- tially offset by an impairment charge in connection with our exit from the video business and other charges of $246 million ($159 million after-tax, or $.06 per diluted share). During 2001, we recorded charges totaling $258 million ($166 million after-tax, or $.06 per diluted share) related to exiting several busi- nesses, including our video business and some leasing activities. During 2000, we recorded charges related to the write-down of some impaired assets and other charges of $1,180 million ($1,025 million after-tax, or $.37 per diluted share), as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2000 Airfone and Video impairment CLEC impairment Real estate consolidation and other merger-related charges Deferred taxes on contribution to the wireless joint venture Other, net (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) Per diluted share Pretax After-tax $ 566 $ 334 362 $ 218 220 – 60 142 249 54 $ 1,180 $ 1,025 $ .13 .08 .05 .09 .02 .37 In connection with our decisions to exit the video business and Airfone (a company involved in air-to-ground communications), in the second quarter of 2000 we recorded an impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of these investments to their estimated net realiz- able value. The CLEC impairment primarily relates to the revaluation of assets and the accrual of costs pertaining to some long-term contracts due to strategic changes in our approach to offering bundled services both in and out of franchise areas. The revised approach to providing such services resulted, in part, from post-merger integration activities and acquisitions. The real estate consolidation and other merger-related charges include the revaluation of assets and the accrual of costs to exit leased facilities that are in excess of our needs as the result of post- merger integration activities. 21 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED The deferred tax charge is non-cash and was recorded as the result of the contribution in July 2000 of the GTE Wireless assets to Verizon Wireless based on the differences between the book and tax bases of assets contributed. Severance/Retirement Enhancement Costs and Settlement Gains/(Losses) Total pension and benefit costs recorded in 2002 related to sever- ances were $2,010 million ($1,264 million after taxes and minority interest, or $.46 per diluted share). In the fourth quarter of 2002, we recorded a pretax charge of $981 million ($604 million after taxes and minority interest, or $.22 per diluted share) primarily associated with pension and benefit costs related to severances. This charge included losses of $910 million ($558 million after-tax, or $.20 per diluted share) recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits” and SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions.” These losses include curtailment losses of $755 million ($464 million after-tax, or $.17 per diluted share) for significant reduc- tion of the expected years of future service resulting from early retirements once the threshold for significance was reached, pension settlement losses of $102 million ($62 million after-tax, or $.02 per diluted share) related to lump sum settlements of some existing pen- sion obligations, and pension and postretirement benefit enhancements of $53 million ($32 million after-tax, or $.01 per diluted share). The fourth quarter charge also included severance costs of $71 million ($46 million after taxes and minority interest, or $.02 per diluted share). We also recorded a pretax charge in 2002 of $295 mil- lion ($185 million after-tax, or $.07 per diluted share) related to settlement losses incurred in connection with previously announced employee separations. SFAS No. 88 requires that settlement losses be recorded once prescribed payment thresholds have been reached. Also during 2002, we recorded a charge of $734 million ($475 million after taxes and minority interest, or $.17 per diluted share) primarily associated with employee severance costs and sev- erance-related activities in connection with the voluntary and involuntary separation of approximately 8,000 employees. During 2001, we recorded a special charge of $1,613 million ($1,001 million after-tax, or $.37 per diluted share) primarily asso- ciated with employee severance costs and related pension enhancements. The charge included severance and related bene- fits of $765 million ($477 million after-tax, or $.18 per diluted share) for the voluntary and involuntary separation of approximately 10,000 employees. We also included a charge of $848 million ($524 million after-tax, or $.19 per diluted share) primarily associ- ated with related pension enhancements. In 2000, we recorded pension settlement gains of $911 million pretax ($564 million after-tax, or $.21 per diluted share) in accordance with SFAS No. 88. They relate to some settlements of pension obligations for former GTE employees through direct payment, the purchase of annuities or otherwise. 22 Investment-Related Charges We continually evaluate our investments in securities for impairment due to declines in market value considered to be other than tempo- rary. That evaluation includes, in addition to persistent, declining stock prices, general economic and company-specific evaluations. In the event of a determination that a decline in market value is other than temporary, a charge to earnings is recorded for the loss and a new cost basis in the investment is established. In 2002, we recorded total net investment-related pretax losses of $6,203 million ($5,652 million after-tax, or $2.06 per diluted share) in Income (Loss) from Unconsolidated Businesses and Operations and Support Expense. These losses are comprised of the following: • A loss of $2,898 million ($2,735 million after-tax, or $1.00 per diluted share) related to our investment in Genuity. This loss includes a write-down of our investments and loans of $2,624 million ($2,560 million after-tax, or $.93 per diluted share). We also recorded a pre- tax charge of $274 million ($175 million after-tax, or $.07 per diluted share) related to the remaining financial exposure to our assets, including receivables, as a result of Genuity’s bankruptcy (see “Other Factors That May Affect Future Results – Genuity” for additional information). • During 2002, we also recorded a pretax loss of $1,400 million ($1,400 million after-tax, or $.51 per diluted share) due to the other than temporary decline in the market value of our investment in CANTV. As a result of the political and economic instability in Venezuela, including the devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar, and the related impact on CANTV’s future economic prospects, we no longer expected that the future undiscounted cash flows applicable to CANTV would be sufficient to recover our invest- ment. Accordingly, we wrote our investment down to market value as of March 31, 2002. • In 2002, we also recorded an other than temporary loss related to several investments, including a loss of $580 million ($430 million after-tax, or $.16 per diluted share) to the market value of our invest- ment in TELUS, a net loss of $347 million ($230 million after-tax, or $.08 per diluted share) related to the market value of our investment in C&W and losses totaling $232 million ($231 million after-tax, or $.08 per diluted share) relating to several other investments. • In 2002, we also recorded a pretax loss of $516 million ($436 mil- lion after-tax, or $.16 per diluted share) to the market value of MFN primarily due to the other than temporary decline in the market value of our investment in MFN. During 2001, we wrote down our investment in MFN due to the declining market value of its stock. We wrote off our remaining investment and other financial state- ment exposure related to MFN in 2002 primarily as a result of its deteriorating financial condition and related defaults. • In addition, in 2002 we recorded a pretax loss of $230 million ($190 million after-tax, or $.07 per diluted share) to fair value due to the other than temporary decline in the fair value of our remain- ing investment in CTI. In 2001, we recorded an estimated loss of $637 million ($637 million after-tax, or $.23 per diluted share) to reflect the impact of the deteriorating Argentinean economy and devaluation of the Argentinean peso on CTI’s financial position. As a result of these charges, our financial exposure related to our equity investment in CTI has been eliminated. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED As a result of capital gains and other income on access line sales and investment sales in 2002, as well as assessments and transactions related to several of the impaired investments during the third and fourth quarters of 2002, we recorded tax benefits of $2,104 million ($.77 per diluted share) in 2002 pertaining to current and prior year investment impairments. The investment impairments primarily relat- ed to debt and equity investments in MFN and in Genuity. Prior to the second quarter of 2001, we considered the declines in the market values of our investments in securities to be temporary, due principally to the overall weakness in the securities markets as well as telecommunications sector share prices. However, included in our results for 2001 is the recognition of pretax losses recorded in June 2001 and December 2001 totaling $4,686 million ($3,607 million after-tax, or $1.32 per diluted share) primarily relating to our invest- ments in C&W, NTL and MFN. We determined, through the evaluation described above, that market value declines in these investments were considered other than temporary. During 2001, we also recorded a pretax charge of $1,251 million ($1,251 million after-tax, or $.46 per diluted share) related to our cost investment in Genuity. The charge was necessary because we deter- mined that the decline in the estimated fair value of Genuity was other than temporary. Our investment in Genuity was not considered a marketable security given its unique characteristics and the associ- ated contingent conversion right (see “Other Factors That May Affect Future Results – Genuity” for additional information). However, we estimated fair value based on the number of shares of Genuity we would own, assuming the exercise of the contingent conversion right, and the market value of Genuity common stock. In May 2000, C&W, NTL and CWC completed a restructuring of CWC. Under the terms of the restructuring, CWC’s consumer cable telephone, television and Internet operations were separated from its corporate, business, Internet protocol and wholesale operations. After the separation, the consumer operations were acquired by NTL and the other operations were acquired by C&W. In connection with the restructuring, we, as a shareholder in CWC, received shares in the two acquiring companies, representing approximately 9.1% of the NTL shares outstanding at the time and approximately 4.6% of the C&W shares outstanding at the time. Our exchange of CWC shares for C&W and NTL shares resulted in the recognition of a non-cash pretax gain of $3,088 million ($1,941 million after-tax, or $.71 per diluted share) in Income (Loss) From Unconsolidated Businesses and a corresponding increase in the cost basis of the shares received. Mark-to-Market Adjustment – Financial Instruments During 2001, we began recording mark-to-market adjustments in earnings relating to some of our financial instruments in accordance with newly effective accounting rules on derivative financial instru- ments. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, we recorded net pretax losses on mark-to-market adjustments of $14 million ($15 million after-tax, or $.01 per diluted share) and $182 mil- lion ($179 million after taxes and minority interest, or $.07 per diluted share), respectively. The losses on mark-to-market adjustments in 2001 were primarily due to the change in the fair value of the MFN debt conversion option. In 2000, we recorded a gain on a mark-to-market adjustment of $664 million ($431 million after-tax, or $.16 per diluted share) related to our then $3,180 million of 4.25% senior exchangeable notes (the 4.25% Notes) which, when issued, were exchangeable into ordinary shares of CWC stock. In connection with a restructuring of CWC in 2000 and the bankruptcy of NTL in 2002, the 4.25% Notes are now exchange- able into shares of C&W and a combination of shares and warrants in the reorganized NTL entities. These mark-to-market adjustments are non-cash, non-operational transactions that result in either an increase or decrease in the carrying value of the debt obligation and a charge or credit to income. The mark-to-market adjustments are required because the 4.25% Notes are indexed to the fair market value of the exchange property into which they are exchangeable. If the fair market value of the exchange property exceeds the exchange price established at the offering date, a mark-to-market adjustment is recorded, recognizing an increase in the carrying value of the debt obligation and a charge to income. If the fair market value of the exchange property subsequently declines, the debt obligation is reduced (but not to less than the amortized carrying value of the notes). The 4.25% Notes became exchangeable in July 2002. For information on our election to redeem the 4.25% Notes, see “Market Risk – Exchangeable Notes.” Genuity Loss In 2000 Prior to the merger of Bell Atlantic and GTE, we owned and consoli- dated Genuity (a tier-one interLATA Internet backbone and related data business). In June 2000, as a condition of the merger, 90.5% of the voting equity of Genuity was issued in an initial public offering. As a result of the initial public offering and our loss of control, we decon- solidated Genuity. Our remaining ownership interest in Genuity contained a contingent conversion feature that gave us the option (if prescribed conditions were met), among other things, to regain con- trol of Genuity. Our ability to legally exercise this conversion feature was dependent on obtaining approvals to provide long distance serv- ice in the former Bell Atlantic region and satisfaction of other regulatory and legal requirements. As a result of the circumstances described above, we began accounting for our investment in Genuity using the cost method after June 30, 2000. Our accounting policy concerning the method of accounting applied to investments (consolidation, equity or cost) involves an evaluation of all significant terms of the investments that explicitly grant or suggest evidence of control or influence over the operations of the entity in which we have invested. Where control is determined, we consolidate the investment. If we determine that we have significant influence over the operating and financial policies of an entity in which we have invested, we apply the equity method. We apply the cost method in situations where we determine that we do not have significant influence, such as our investment in Genuity. As a result, Genuity’s revenues and expenses, as well as changes in bal- ance sheet accounts and cash flows subsequent to June 30, 2000 are no longer included in our consolidated financial results. For com- parability, we have included Genuity’s results prior to June 30, 2000 in special and non-recurring items. The after-tax losses of Genuity were $281 million (or $.10 per diluted share) in 2000. 23 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED For information on our July 2002 decision not to regain control of Genuity and our ongoing commercial relationship with Genuity, see “Other Factors That May Affect Future Results – Genuity.” In addition, for information on charges related to Genuity, see “Investment- Related Charges” in this section. Completion of Merger In June 2000, Bell Atlantic and GTE completed a merger under a definitive merger agreement dated as of July 27, 1998 and began doing business as Verizon. The following table summarizes the pretax charges incurred for the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger. Years Ended December 31, Direct Incremental Costs Compensation arrangements Professional services Shareowner-related Registration, regulatory and other Total Direct Incremental Costs Employee Severance Costs Transition Costs Systems modifications Branding Relocation, training and other Total Transition Costs Total Merger-Related Costs 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 $ $ – $ – – – – – $ – – – – – – 210 161 35 66 472 584 283 99 401 10 240 112 217 355 526 510 694 1,039 510 $ 1,039 $ 1,750 Merger-Related Costs Direct Incremental Costs Direct incremental costs related to the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger of $472 million ($378 million after-tax, or $.14 per diluted share) include compensation, professional services and other costs. Compensation includes retention payments to employees that were contingent on the close of the merger and payments to employees to satisfy con- tractual obligations triggered by the changes in control. Professional services include investment banking, legal, accounting, consulting and other advisory fees incurred to obtain federal and state regulatory approvals and take other actions necessary to complete the merger. Other includes costs incurred to obtain shareholder approval of the merger, register securities and communicate with shareholders, employees and regulatory authorities regarding merger issues. Employee Severance Costs Employee severance costs related to the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger of $584 million ($371 million after-tax, or $.14 per diluted share) as recorded under SFAS No. 112, “Employers’ Accounting for Postemployment Benefits,” represent the benefit costs for the sepa- ration of approximately 5,500 management employees who were entitled to benefits under pre-existing separation plans, as well as an accrual for ongoing SFAS No. 112 obligations for GTE employees. Of these employees, approximately 5,200 were located in the United States and approximately 300 were located at various international locations. The separations occurred as a result of consolidations and process enhancements within our operating segments. As of December 31, 2002, the severances in connection with the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger are complete. 24 Transition Costs In addition to the direct incremental merger-related and severance costs discussed above, we announced at the time of the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger that we expected to incur a total of approxi- mately $2 billion of transition costs related to the merger and the formation of the wireless joint venture. These costs were incurred to integrate systems, consolidate real estate and relocate employees. They also included approximately $500 million for advertising and other costs to establish the Verizon brand. Transition activities are complete at December 31, 2002 and totaled $2,243 million. For 2002, 2001 and 2000, transition costs were $510 million ($288 million after taxes and minority interest, or $.10 per diluted share), $1,039 million ($578 million after taxes and minority interest, or $.21 per diluted share) and $694 million ($316 million after taxes and minority interest, or $.12 per diluted share), respectively. Other Charges and Special Items During 2002, we recorded pretax charges of $593 million ($445 mil- lion after-tax, or $.16 per diluted share) primarily related to a pretax impairment charge in connection with our financial statement expo- sure to WorldCom due to its July 2002 bankruptcy of $300 million ($183 million after-tax, or $.07 per diluted share), a pretax impairment charge of $117 million ($136 million after-tax, or $.05 per diluted share) pertaining to our leasing operations for airplanes leased to air- lines currently experiencing financial difficulties and other pretax charges of $176 million ($126 million after-tax, or $.04 per diluted share). In addition, we recorded a pretax charge of $175 million ($114 million after-tax, or $.04 per diluted share) related to a settlement of a litigation matter that arose from our decision to terminate an agree- ment with NorthPoint Communications Group, Inc. (NorthPoint) to combine the two companies’ DSL businesses. In 2002, we sold nearly all of our investment in TCNZ for net cash proceeds of $769 million, which resulted in a pretax gain of $383 mil- lion ($229 million after-tax, or $.08 per diluted share). Other charges and special items recorded during 2001 include asset impairments related to property sales and facility consolidation of $151 million ($95 million after-tax, or $.03 per diluted share). In 2001, we also recorded a loss of $35 million ($26 million after-tax, or $.01 per diluted share) related to international losses. Other charges and special items recorded during 2000 included the write-off of our investment in NorthPoint of $155 million ($153 million after-tax, or $.06 per diluted share) as a result of the deterioration in NorthPoint’s business, operations and financial condition. We also recorded a pretax charge of $50 million ($50 million after-tax, or $.02 per diluted share) associated with our share of costs incurred at two of our international equity investees to complete employee separa- tion programs. Other charges and special items in 2000 also included the cost of disposing or abandoning redundant assets and discontinued system development projects in connection with the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger of $287 million ($175 million after-tax, or $.06 per diluted share), regulatory settlements of $98 million ($61 million after-tax, or $.02 per diluted share) and other asset write-downs of $416 million ($290 million after-tax, or $.11 per diluted share). MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED Extraordinary Items In 2002, we recognized a net pretax extraordinary charge of $19 mil- lion ($9 million after-tax, or less than $.01 per diluted share) related to the extinguishments of $2,306 million of debt prior to the stated maturity dates. During 2001, we retired $726 million of debt prior to the stated matu- rity date, resulting in a pretax extraordinary charge of $29 million ($19 million after-tax, or $.01 per diluted share). In June 2000, we entered into a series of definitive sale agreements to resolve service area conflicts prohibited by FCC regulations as a result of the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger (see “Sales of Assets, Net – Wireless Overlap Property Sales”). These agreements, which were pursuant to the consent decree issued for the merger, enabled both the formation of Verizon Wireless and the closing of the merger. Since the sales were required by the consent decree and occurred after the merger, the gains on sales were recorded net of taxes as Extraordinary Items in the consolidated statements of income. During the second half of 2000, we completed the sale of the to CFW (former PrimeCo) wireless market Richmond Communications Company in exchange for two wireless rural service areas in Virginia and cash. The sale resulted in a pretax gain of $184 million ($112 million after-tax, or $.04 per diluted share). In addition, we completed the sales of the consolidated markets in Washington and Texas and unconsolidated interests in Texas (former GTE) to SBC Communications. The sales resulted in a pretax gain of $886 million ($532 million after-tax, or $.19 per diluted share). Also, we completed the sale of the San Diego (former GTE) market to AT&T Wireless. The sale resulted in a pretax gain of $304 million ($182 million after-tax, or $.07 per diluted share). In 2000, we also completed the sale of the Houston (former PrimeCo) wireless overlap market to AT&T Wireless, resulting in a pretax gain of $350 million ($213 million after-tax, or $.08 per diluted share). During 2000, we retired $190 million of debt prior to the stated matu- rity date, resulting in a pretax extraordinary charge of $19 million ($12 million after-tax, or less than $.01 per diluted share). Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections,” and will no longer report extinguishments of debt as extraordinary items. Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change Impact of SFAS No. 142 We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 142 no longer permits the amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Instead, these assets must be reviewed annually (or more frequently under various conditions) for impairment in accordance with this statement. Results for the year ended December 31, 2002 include the initial impact of adoption recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change of $496 million after-tax ($.18 per diluted share). In accordance with the new rules, starting January 1, 2002, we are no longer amortizing goodwill, acquired workforce intangible assets and wireless licenses which we determined have an indefinite life. On a comparable basis, had we not amortized these intangible assets during the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, net income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change would have been $973 million ($.36 per diluted share) and $11,113 million ($4.06 per diluted share), respectively, or increased by $383 million ($.14 per diluted share) and $303 million ($.11 per diluted share) in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Impact of SFAS No. 133 We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities” on January 1, 2001. The impact on Verizon pertains to the recognition of changes in the fair value of derivative instruments. Results for the year ended December 31, 2001 include the initial impact of adoption recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change of $182 million after-tax ($.07 per diluted share) in the first quarter of 2001. This cumulative effect charge primarily relates to the change in the fair value of the MFN debt conversion option prior to January 1, 2001. Impact of SAB No. 101 We adopted the provisions of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,” in the fourth quarter of 2000, retroactive to January 1, 2000, as required by the SEC. The impact of SAB No. 101 on our results pertains to the deferral of some non- recurring fees, such as service activation and installation fees, and associated incremental direct costs, and the recognition of those revenues and costs over the expected term of the customer rela- tionship. Our 2000 results include the initial impact of adoption recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change of $40 mil- lion after-tax ($.01 per diluted share). OTHER CONSOLIDATED RESULTS The following discussion of nonoperating items is based on the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements. Other Income and (Expense), Net Years Ended December 31, Interest income Foreign exchange gains (losses), net Other, net Total 2002 187 $ (93) 46 140 $ $ $ (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 383 $ 32 34 449 $ 281 (11) 41 311 The changes in other income and expense were primarily due to the changes in interest income and foreign exchange gains and losses. We recorded additional interest income in 2001 primarily as a result of interest on several notes receivable and the settlement of tax-related matters. Foreign exchange gains and losses were affected primarily by Iusacell, which uses the Mexican peso as its functional currency. We expect that our earnings will continue to be affected by foreign currency gains or losses associated with the U.S. dollar denominated debt issued by Iusacell. Interest Expense Years Ended December 31, 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 Total interest expense Capitalized interest costs Total interest costs on debt balances Average debt outstanding Effective interest rate 368 185 $ 3,237 $ 3,369 $ 3,490 230 $ 3,422 $ 3,737 $ 3,720 $ 59,967 $ 62,622 $ 51,987 7.2% 6.0% 5.7% 25 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED The decrease in interest costs in 2002, compared to 2001, was prin- cipally attributable to lower average interest rates and lower debt levels. The decrease in the average debt levels for 2002 was primarily due to lower commercial paper borrowings. Cash from operations, asset sales and other favorable cash flows (see “Consolidated Financial Condition”) reduced the need for financing in 2002. In addi- tion, lower capital expenditures in 2002 contributed to lower capitalized interest costs. The effect of lower average interest rates on 2001 interest costs was more than offset by the increase in average debt levels from 2000. The increase in debt levels was mainly the result of funding for capi- tal expenditures primarily at our Domestic Telecom and Domestic Wireless segments and the debt assumed by Verizon Wireless in con- nection with the formation of Verizon Wireless. Years Ended December 31, 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 Minority interest $ 1,270 $ 622 $ 216 The increase in minority interest expense in 2002 and 2001 was pri- marily due to higher earnings at Domestic Wireless, which has a significant minority interest attributable to Vodafone (see “Segment Results of Operations – Domestic Wireless”). The decrease in minor- ity interest expense from losses at Iusacell in 2002 is more than offset by the consolidation of TELPRI and the deconsolidation of CTI (see “Segment Results of Operations – International”). Years Ended December 31, 2002 2001 2000 Effective income tax rates 26.1% 78.7% 39.3% The effective income tax rate is the provision for income taxes as a percentage of income before the provision for income taxes. Our effective income tax rate for 2002 was favorably impacted by tax benefits recorded in 2002 relating to the other than temporary decline in fair value of several of our investments recorded during 2002 and 2001 that were not available at the time the investments were written down, as the decline in fair value was not recognizable at the time of the impairment (see “Special and Non-Recurring Items – Investment- Related Charges”), partially offset by other investment charges in 2002 associated with other than temporary declines in fair value for which an associated tax benefit was not available. The effective rate for 2002 was also favorably impacted by a tax law change relating to employee stock ownership plan dividend deductions, increased state tax benefits and capital loss utilization. The effective income tax rate for 2001 is not consistent with 2000 pri- marily because tax benefits were not available on many of the losses resulting from the other than temporary decline in market value of several of our investments during 2001. A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effec- tive rate for each period is included in Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements. 26 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION Years Ended December 31, Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) Operating activities Investing activities Financing activities Increase (Decrease) In Cash and 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 $ 22,100 $ 19,773 $ 15,827 (16,055) (21,626) (1,048) 2,075 (6,828) (14,813) Cash Equivalents $ 459 $ 222 $ (1,276) We use the net cash generated from our operations to fund capital expenditures for network expansion and modernization, repay exter- nal financing, pay dividends, and invest in new businesses. Additional external financing is utilized when necessary. While our current liabil- ities typically exceed current assets, our sources of funds, primarily from operations and, to the extent necessary, from readily available external financing arrangements, are sufficient to meet ongoing oper- ating and investing requirements. We expect that capital spending requirements will continue to be financed primarily through internally generated funds. Additional debt or equity financing may be needed to fund additional development activities or to maintain our capital structure to ensure our financial flexibility. Cash Flows Provided By Operating Activities Our primary source of funds continues to be cash generated from operations. In 2002, the increase in cash from operations compared to 2001 primarily reflects improved results of operations before gains or losses on asset sales. In 2001, the increase in cash from operations compared to 2000 pri- marily reflects improved results of operations before gains and losses on asset sales, net and the mark-to-market adjustments of financial instruments, which are adjusted in cash from operating activities, partially offset by an increase in working capital requirements. Decreased cash flow from operations during 2000 resulted primarily from the payment of income taxes on the disposition of businesses and assets. See “Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities” for addi- tional information on sales of businesses and assets. Cash Flows Used In Investing Activities Capital expenditures continue to be our primary use of capital resources and facilitate the introduction of new products and services, enhance responsiveness to competitive challenges and increase the operating efficiency and productivity of our networks. Excluding cap- italized non-network software, we invested $6,977 million in our Domestic Telecom business in 2002, compared to $11,480 million and $12,119 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. We also invested $4,354 million in our Domestic Wireless business in 2002, compared to $5,006 million and $4,322 million, respectively, in 2001 and 2000. The decrease in capital spending in 2002, particularly by Domestic Telecom, is primarily due to the effective management of our capital expenditure budget to current network demand. The increase in cap- ital spending in 2001 is primarily due to the inclusion of both Vodafone and PrimeCo properties in Verizon Wireless in April 2000, as well as increased capital spending in existing Bell Atlantic and GTE wireless properties. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED Capital spending, including capitalized non-network software, is expected to be approximately $12.5 billion to $13.5 billion in 2003. We invested $1,093 million in acquisitions and investments in busi- nesses during 2002, including $556 million to acquire some of the cellular properties of Dobson Communications Corporation and $242 million for other wireless properties. We also received a $1,740 million refund from the FCC in connection with our wireless auction payment (see “Other Factors That May Affect Future Results – Recent Developments – FCC Auction” for additional information). In 2001, we invested $3,142 million in acquisitions and investments in businesses, including $1,691 million related to wireless licenses purchased in connection with an FCC auction (see “Other Factors That May Affect Future Results – Recent Developments – FCC Auction” for additional information), $410 million for additional wireless spectrum purchased from another telecommunications carrier and $194 million in wireless properties. In addition, we invested $497 million in 2001 to acquire the directory business of TELUS. In 2000, we invested $2,247 million in acquisitions and investments including approximately $715 million in the equity of MFN and $1,028 million in wireless properties. In 2002, we received cash proceeds of $4,638 million, including $3,868 million from the sale of non-strategic access lines and $770 million in connection with the sale of TSI. In 2001, we received cash proceeds of $200 million and $215 million in connection with sales of our Cincinnati and Chicago wireless overlap properties, respectively. In 2000, we received cash proceeds on sales of businesses and assets of $6,794 million, including gross cash proceeds of $4,903 million from the sale of non-strategic access lines and $1,464 million from overlap wireless properties, as well as $144 million from the sale of our CyberTrust business. Our short-term investments include principally cash equivalents held in trust accounts for payment of employee benefits. In 2002, 2001 and 2000, we invested $2,099 million, $2,002 million and $1,204 mil- lion, respectively, in short-term investments, primarily to pre-fund active employees’ health and welfare benefits. Proceeds from the sales of all short-term investments, principally for the payment of these benefits, were $1,931 million, $1,595 million and $983 million in the years 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Other, net investing activities include capitalized non-network soft- ware of $1,161 million in 2002, compared with $1,250 million and $1,044 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Other, net investing activities for 2002 also includes total cash proceeds of $1,453 million in connection with share sales of various investments, including net cash proceeds of $769 million in connection with a sale of our invest- ment in TCNZ and $281 million related to the sale of our investment in C&W, and purchases of investments of $425 million. Other, net investing activities for 2001 include loans to Genuity of $1,150 million (see “Other Factors That May Affect Future Results – Genuity”). In addition, in 2001 we received a deposit of $191 million related to a sale of telephone lines, $167 million in connection with CANTV’s share repurchase program and proceeds of $515 million related to prior year wireless asset sales. During 2000, we invested $975 million in subordinated convertible notes of MFN, in connection with our overall investment in MFN, as well as $45 million in OnePoint Communications Corp. notes, included in Other, net investing activities. The MFN notes were originally issued to be convertible at our option, upon receipt of necessary gov- ernment approvals, into MFN common stock at a conversion price of $17 per share (after two-for-one stock split) or an additional 9.6% of the equity of MFN (based on shares outstanding at that time). This investment completed a portion of our previously announced agree- ment, as amended, with MFN, which included the acquisition of approximately $350 million of long-term capacity on MFN’s fiber optic networks, from 1999 through 2002. Of the $350 million, $105 million was paid in October 2000 and $95 million was paid in 2001, and these amounts are included in net cash provided by operating activities. In 2001 we renegotiated several significant terms of our MFN investment and commitments, in connection with a new financ- ing arrangement. Pursuant to that financing arrangement, we purchased $50 million of senior secured convertible notes that are convertible into MFN common stock at a conversion price of $.53 per share. This new financing arrangement also repriced $500 million of the subordinated convertible notes purchased in 2000 to a conver- sion price of $3 per share (from $17 per share). However, we wrote off our remaining investment and other financial statement exposure related to MFN in 2002 primarily as a result of its deteriorating finan- cial condition and related defaults. Under the terms of an investment agreement relating to our wireless joint venture, Vodafone may require us or Verizon Wireless to pur- chase up to an aggregate of $20 billion worth of its interest in Verizon Wireless between 2003 and 2007 at its then fair market value. The purchase of up to $10 billion, in cash or stock at our option, may be required in the summer of 2003 or 2004, and the remainder, which may not exceed $10 billion at any one time, in the summers of 2005 through 2007. Vodafone has the option to require us or Verizon Wireless to satisfy up to $7.5 billion of the remainder with cash or contributed debt. Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities Cash of $11,602 million was used to reduce our total debt during 2002. We repaid $4,083 million of Verizon Global Funding Corp., $2,454 million of Domestic Telecom and $1,022 million of Domestic Wireless long-term debt (including $585 million of net debt assumed in connection with the Price transaction), and reduced our short-term borrowings by $11,024 million primarily with cash and the issuance of Domestic Telecom and Verizon Global Funding long-term debt. Domestic Telecom and Verizon Global Funding issued $3,779 million and $3,816 million of long-term debt, respectively. The net cash proceeds from increases in our total debt during 2001 of $6,064 million was primarily due to the issuance of $7,002 million of long-term debt by Verizon Global Funding, partially offset by repayments of $980 million of maturities of corporate long-term debt. In addition, Verizon Wireless issued $4,555 million of long-term debt and repaid $4,690 million of revolving loans, while Domestic Telecom incurred $2,303 million of long-term debt, repaid $573 million of net short-term debt and retired $1,430 million of long-term debt. In 2000, the net cash proceeds from increases in our total debt of $5,058 million was primarily due to the issuance of $5,500 million of long-term notes issued by Verizon Global Funding. The increase in total debt was also attributable to the issuance of $893 million of notes under a medium-term note program, $657 million of financing transactions of cellular assets, $398 million of long-term bank debt at 27 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED Verizon Wireless and an increase in other short-term borrowings, par- tially offset by repayments of long-term debt. The pre-funding of employee benefit trusts also contributed to the increase in debt lev- els in 2001 and 2000. Additionally, the purchases of shares to fund employee stock option exercises contributed to the increase in debt levels in 2000. Our ratio of debt to debt and shareowners’ equity was 62.4% at December 31, 2002, compared to 66.4% at December 31, 2001. As of December 31, 2002, we had $596 million in bank borrowings outstanding. In addition, we had approximately $7.9 billion of unused bank lines of credit and our telephone and financing subsidiaries had shelf registrations for the issuance of up to $5.1 billion of unsecured debt securities. The debt securities of our telephone and financing subsidiaries continue to be accorded high ratings by primary rating agencies. However, in March 2002, Standard & Poor’s (S&P) revised our credit rating outlook from stable to negative, citing concern about the overall debt level of Verizon. In May 2002, Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) placed our debt under review for possible down- grade. In December 2002, Moody’s downgraded our senior unsecured debt rating from A1 to A2, and changed our credit rating outlook from negative to stable. The short term rating of Prime-1 was maintained. We have adopted a debt portfolio strategy that includes a reduction in total debt as well as a reduction in the short-term debt component. In February 2003, S&P upgraded our credit rating out- look from negative to stable, citing debt reduction efforts over the past year. As in prior years, dividend payments were a significant use of capital resources. We determine the appropriateness of the level of our divi- dend payments on a periodic basis by considering such factors as long-term growth opportunities, internal cash requirements, and the expectations of our shareowners. In 2002 and 2001, we declared quarterly cash dividends of $.385 per share. In the first, third and fourth quarters of 2000, we announced a quarterly cash dividend of $.385 per share. In the second quarter of 2000, we announced two separate pro rata dividends to ensure that the respective shareown- ers of Bell Atlantic and GTE received dividends at an appropriate rate. In 2001 and 2000, common stock repurchases were primarily the result of the two-year share buyback program approved by the Board of Directors in March 2000 and repurchase of GTE common stock. In January 2002, the Board of Directors approved an extension of the existing buy-back program to February 2004. In 2001 and 2000, 0.4 million and 35.1 million Verizon common shares were repurchased, respectively. In August 1999, GTE announced the initiation of a share repurchase program to offset shares issued under its employee-ben- efit and dividend-reinvestment programs. Under the program, we repurchased approximately 17.7 million shares of GTE common stock in 1999, and completed the program with the purchase of an additional 8.4 million shares valued at approximately $600 million through February 2000. Increase (Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents Our cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2002 totaled $1,438 million, a $459 million increase over cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2001 of $979 million. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was driven by favorable results of operations, proceeds 28 from non-strategic access line sales and other sales, partially offset by capital expenditures and a significant reduction in borrowings in 2002. The December 31, 2001 balance of cash and cash equivalents increased by $222 million compared to December 31, 2000. Additional Minimum Pension Liability and Contributions In 2002, we recorded an additional minimum pension liability of $1,342 million for the amount of excess unfunded accumulated ben- efit liability over our accrued liability, as required by SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions.” We periodically evaluate each pension plan to determine whether any additional minimum liability is required. As a result of lower interest rates and lower than expected 2002 investment returns, an additional minimum pension liability was required for a small number of plans. The increase in the liability is recorded as a charge to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of a tax benefit, in shareowners’ investment in the consolidated balance sheets. The majority of Verizon’s pension plans are adequately funded. Based on the funded status of the plans at December 31, 2002, there will be no significant pension trust contributions required through 2003; however, we anticipate making required pension trust contributions of approximately $125 million in 2004. Leasing Arrangements We are the lessor in leveraged and direct financing lease agreements under which commercial aircraft and power generating facilities, which comprise the majority of the portfolio, along with industrial equipment, real estate property, telecommunications and other equipment are leased for remaining terms of less than 1 year to 45 years as of December 31, 2002. Minimum lease payments receiv- able represent unpaid rentals, less principal and interest on third-party nonrecourse debt relating to leveraged lease transac- tions. Since we have no general liability for this debt, which holds a senior security interest in the leased equipment and rentals, the related principal and interest have been offset against the minimum lease payments receivable in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. All recourse debt is reflected in our consoli- dated balance sheets. Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments The following table provides a summary of our contractual obliga- tions and commercial commitments at December 31, 2002. Additional detail about these items is included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. (dollars in millions) Contractual Obligations Long-term debt Capital lease obligations Operating leases Other long-term obligations Total contractual cash obligations Payments Due By Period 4-5 years 1-3 years Less than 1 year Total After 5 years $ 51,737 $ 7,133 $ 10,520 $ 7,737 $ 26,347 241 4,305 1,173 54 825 725 93 1,382 34 1,051 60 1,047 447 1 – $ 57,456 $ 8,737 $ 12,442 $ 8,823 $ 27,454 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED MARKET RISK We are exposed to various types of market risk in the normal course of our business, including the impact of interest rate changes, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, changes in equity investment prices and changes in corporate tax rates. We employ risk manage- ment strategies using a variety of derivatives, including interest rate swap agreements, interest rate caps and floors, foreign currency for- wards and options, equity options and basis swap agreements. We do not hold derivatives for trading purposes. It is our general policy to enter into interest rate, foreign currency and other derivative transactions only to the extent necessary to achieve our desired objectives in limiting our exposures to the vari- ous market risks. Our objectives include maintaining a mix of fixed and variable rate debt to lower borrowing costs within reasonable risk parameters and to protect against earnings and cash flow volatility resulting from changes in market conditions. We do not hedge our market risk exposure in a manner that would completely eliminate the effect of changes in interest rates, equity prices and foreign exchange rates on our earnings. We do not expect that our net income, liquidity and cash flows will be materially affected by these risk management strategies. Exchangeable Notes In 1998, we issued exchangeable notes as described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements and discussed earlier under “Mark-to-Market Adjustment – Financial Instruments.” These finan- cial instruments expose us to market risk, including: • Equity price risk, because the notes are exchangeable into shares that are traded on the open market and routinely fluctuate in value. • Foreign exchange rate risk, because the notes are exchangeable into shares that are denominated in a foreign currency. • Interest rate risk, because the notes carry fixed interest rates. Periodically, equity price or foreign exchange rate movements may require us to mark-to-market the exchangeable note liability to reflect the increase or decrease in the current share price compared to the established exchange price, resulting in a charge or credit to income. The following sensitivity analysis measures the effect on earnings and financial condition due to changes in the exchange property for the exchangeable notes. • At December 31, 2002, each $1,000 principal amount of 5.75% notes (each, a 5.75% Note) was exchangeable into 178.0369 ordi- nary shares of TCNZ (5.75% Note Exchange Property), and the market value of the 5.75% Note Exchange Property was substan- tially below the debt liability associated with each 5.75% Note. Each $20 increase in the value of the 5.75% Note Exchange Property above the value of the associated debt liability would in the aggregate reduce our pretax earnings by $49 million. • At December 31, 2002, each $1,000 principal amount of 4.25% notes (each, a 4.25% Note) was exchangeable into 40.3702 ordi- nary shares of C&W and 7.6949 shares of NTL (collectively, 4.25% Note Exchange Property), and the market value of the 4.25% Note Exchange Property was substantially below the debt liability associated with each 4.25% Note. As a result of NTL’s emergence from bankruptcy, the 4.25% Note Exchange Property now consists of C&W shares and a combination of shares and warrants in the reorganized NTL entities. Each $20 increase in the value of the 4.25% Note Exchange Property above the value of the associated debt liability would in the aggregate reduce our pretax earnings by $53 million. • A subsequent decrease in the value of the 5.75% Note Exchange Property or the 4.25% Note Exchange Property would corre- spondingly increase earnings, but not to exceed the amount of any previous reduction in earnings. • Our cash flows would not be affected by mark-to-market activity relating to the exchangeable notes. If we decide to deliver the exchange property, which we may have to purchase for cash, in exchange for the notes, the exchangeable note liability (including any mark-to-market adjustments) will be eliminated and the investment will be reduced by the fair market value of the exchange property delivered. Upon settlement, any excess of the lia- bility over the book value of the exchange property delivered will be recorded as a gain. We also have the option to settle these liabilities with cash upon exchange. On February 4, 2003, Verizon Global Funding, the issuer of the 4.25% Notes, exercised its right under the indenture to redeem all of the out- standing 4.25% Notes on March 15, 2003. The cash redemption price for the 4.25% Notes is $1,048.29 for each $1,000 principal amount of the notes. A holder of 4.25% Notes that exercises an exchange right will receive a cash settlement of $1,000 for each $1,000 principal amount of the notes. As of December 31, 2002, the principal amount of 4.25% Notes outstanding, before unamortized discount, was $2,839 million. Interest Rate Risk The table that follows summarizes the fair values of our long-term debt, interest rate derivatives and exchangeable notes as of December 31, 2002 and 2001. The table also provides a sensitivity analysis of the estimated fair values of these financial instruments assuming 100-basis-point upward and downward parallel shifts in the yield curve. Our sensitivity analysis did not include the fair values of our commercial paper and bank loans because they are not signif- icantly affected by changes in market interest rates. At December 31, 2002 Fair Value Fair Value assuming +100 basis point shift (dollars in millions) Fair Value assuming -100 basis point shift Long-term debt and interest rate derivatives Exchangeable notes Total At December 31, 2001 Long-term debt and interest rate derivatives Exchangeable notes Total $ $ $ $ 49,446 5,239 54,685 45,736 5,678 51,414 $ $ $ $ 46,913 5,162 52,075 43,667 5,538 49,205 $ $ $ $ 52,222 5,317 57,539 47,973 5,786 53,759 29 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED Equity Risk The fair values of some of our investments, primarily in common stock, expose us to equity price risk. These investments are subject to changes in the market prices of the securities. As noted earlier, the fair values of our exchangeable notes are also affected by changes in equity price movements. The table that follows summarizes the fair values of our investments and exchangeable notes and provides a sensitivity analysis of the estimated fair values of these financial instruments assuming a 10% increase or decrease in equity prices. The table that follows summarizes the fair values of our foreign cur- rency derivatives, cost investments, and the exchangeable notes as of December 31, 2002 and 2001. The table also provides a sensitivity analysis of the estimated fair values of these financial instruments assuming a 10% decrease and increase in the value of the U.S. dol- lar against the various currencies to which we are exposed. Our sensitivity analysis does not include potential changes in the value of our international investments accounted for under the equity method. As of December 31, 2002, the carrying value of our equity method international investments totaled approximately $3.4 billion. At December 31, 2002 Fair Value Fair Value (dollars in millions) Fair Value assuming 10% assuming 10% increase in equity price decrease in equity price At December 31, 2002 Fair Value Fair Value (dollars in millions) Fair Value assuming 10% assuming 10% increase in US$ decrease in US$ Equity price sensitive cost investments, at fair value and derivatives Exchangeable notes Total At December 31, 2001 Equity price sensitive cost investments, at fair value and derivatives Exchangeable notes Total $ $ $ $ 363 (5,239) (4,876) 2,189 (5,678) (3,489) $ $ $ $ 352 (5,239) (4,887) 2,008 (5,677) (3,669) $ $ $ $ 375 (5,239) (4,864) 2,369 (5,680) (3,311) Foreign exchange sensitive cost investments and foreign currency derivatives Exchangeable notes Total At December 31, 2001 Foreign exchange sensitive cost investments and foreign currency derivatives Exchangeable notes Total $ $ $ $ 98 (5,239) (5,141) 1,433 (5,678) (4,245) $ $ $ $ 73 (5,239) (5,166) 1,581 (5,680) (4,099) $ $ $ $ 126 (5,239) (5,113) 1,316 (5,677) (4,361) Foreign Currency Translation The functional currency for nearly all of our foreign operations is the local currency. The translation of income statement and balance sheet amounts of these entities into U.S. dollars are recorded as cumulative in translation adjustments, which are Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss in our consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2002, our primary translation exposure was to the Venezuelan bolivar, Mexican peso, Dominican Republic peso, Canadian dollar and the Euro. We have not hedged our accounting translation exposure to foreign currency fluctuations relative to the carrying value of these investments. included In 2002, 2001 and 2000, our earnings were affected by foreign cur- rency gains or losses associated with the unhedged portion of U. S. dollar denominated debt at Iusacell. Equity income from our international investments is affected by exchange rate fluctuations when an equity investee has assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than the investee’s func- tional currency. Several of our equity investees have assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than the investee’s func- tional currency, such as our investments in Venezuela, Canada and Slovakia. Foreign Exchange Risk The fair values of our foreign currency derivatives and investments accounted for under the cost method are subject to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. We use forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset foreign exchange gains and losses on British pound and Japanese yen denominated debt obligations. 30 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS Significant Accounting Policies A summary of the significant accounting policies used in preparing our financial statements are as follows: • Special and non-recurring items generally represent revenues and gains as well as expenses and losses that are non-operational and/or non-recurring in nature. Several of these special and non- recurring items include impairment losses. These impairment losses were determined in accordance with our policy of comparing the fair value of the asset with its carrying value. The fair value is determined by quoted market prices or by estimates of future cash flows. There is inherent subjectivity involved in estimating future cash flows, which impacts the amount of any impairment. • We continually evaluate our investments in securities for impair- ment due to declines in market value considered to be other than temporary. That evaluation includes, in addition to persistent, declining stock prices, general economic and company-specific evaluations. In the event of a determination that a decline in mar- ket value is other than temporary, a charge to earnings is recorded for the loss and a new cost basis in the investment is established. Given our significant investments in securities, other than tempo- rary declines in market values can have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition. • We maintain defined benefit pension plans for most of our employees. In the aggregate, the fair value of plan assets of those plans exceeds benefit obligations, which contributes to pension plan income. Significant pension plan assumptions, including the MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED discount rate used, the long-term rate of return on plan assets and rate of future increases in compensation are periodically updated and impact the amount of pension plan income, assets and obli- gations (see “Consolidated Results of Operations – Consolidated Net Income – Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits”). year will be recognized for new awards granted, modified, or settled. However, in subsequent years, the vesting of awards issued on or after January 1, 2003 may cause an increase in employee compen- sation expense. We estimate the impact in 2003 will be approximately $.01 to $.02 per diluted share. • Our accounting policy concerning the method of accounting applied to investments (consolidation, equity or cost) involves an evaluation of all significant terms of the investments that explicitly grant or suggest evidence of control or influence over the opera- tions of the entity in which we have invested. Where control is determined, we consolidate the investment. If we determine that we have significant influence over the operating and financial poli- cies of an entity in which we have invested, we apply the equity method. We apply the cost method in situations where we deter- mine that we do not have significant influence. • Our current and deferred income taxes, and associated valuation allowances, are impacted by events and transactions arising in the normal course of business as well as in connection with special and non-recurring items. Assessment of the appropriate amount and classification of income taxes is dependent on several factors, including estimates of the timing and realization of deferred income tax assets and the timing of income tax payments. Actual collections and payments may differ from these estimates as a result of changes in tax laws as well as unanticipated future trans- actions impacting related income tax balances. • Intangible assets are a significant component of our consolidated assets. Wireless licenses of $40,088 million represent the largest component of our intangible assets. Our wireless licenses are indefinite-lived intangible assets, and as required by SFAS No. 142, are no longer amortized but are periodically evaluated for impairment. Any impairment loss would be determined by com- paring the fair value of the wireless licenses with their carrying value. The fair value is determined by estimating future cash flows. There is inherent subjectivity involved in estimating future cash flows, which impacts the amount of any impairment. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Accounting for Stock Options In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure.” This statement amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. This statement permits two additional transition methods (modified prospective and retroactive restatement) for enti- ties that adopt the preferable method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. Effective January 1, 2003 we adopted the fair value recognition pro- visions of SFAS No. 123, using the prospective method, for all new awards granted to employees after January 1, 2003. Under the prospective method, employee compensation expense in the first Exit or Disposal Activities In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in Restructuring).” EITF Issue No. 94-3 required accrual of liabilities related to exit and disposal activities at a plan (commitment) date. SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. The provisions of this statement are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. Asset Retirement Obligations On January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” This statement provides the account- ing for the cost of legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 143 requires that companies recognize the fair value of a liability for asset retirement obligations in the period in which the obligations are incurred and capitalize that amount as part of the book value of the long-lived asset. We have determined that Verizon does not have a material legal obligation to remove long- lived assets as described by this statement. However, we have included estimated removal costs in our group depreciation models. These costs have increased depreciation expense and accumulated depreciation for future removal costs for existing assets. These removal costs are recorded as a reduction to accumulated deprecia- tion when the assets are retired and removal costs are incurred. For some assets, such as telephone poles, the removal costs exceed salvage value. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 143, we are required to exclude costs of removal from our depreciation rates for assets for which the removal costs exceed salvage. Accordingly, in connection with the initial adoption of this standard on January 1, 2003, we have reversed accrued costs of removal in excess of salvage from our accumulated depreciation accounts for these assets. The adjustment was recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change, result- ing in the recognition of a gain of approximately $3.4 billion ($2.0 billion after-tax). Effective January 1, 2003, we began expensing costs of removal in excess of salvage for these assets as incurred. The impact of this change in accounting will result in a decrease in depreciation expense and an increase in operational and support expenses. We estimate the net favorable impact in 2003, excluding the cumulative effect adjustment, will be approximately $50 million to $70 million ($30 million to $42 million after-tax). 31 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED OTHER FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS Genuity Prior to the merger of Bell Atlantic and GTE, we owned and consoli- dated Genuity (a tier-one interLATA Internet backbone and related data business). In June 2000, as a condition of the merger, 90.5% of the voting equity of Genuity was issued in an initial public offering. As a result of the initial public offering and our loss of control, we decon- solidated Genuity. Our remaining ownership interest in Genuity contained a contingent conversion feature that gave us the option (if prescribed conditions were met), among other things, to regain con- trol of Genuity. Our ability to legally exercise this conversion feature was dependent on obtaining approvals to provide long distance serv- ice in the former Bell Atlantic region and satisfaction of other regulatory and legal requirements. On July 24, 2002, we converted all but one of our shares of Class B common stock of Genuity into shares of Class A common stock of Genuity. As a result, we have relinquished the right to convert our cur- rent ownership into a controlling interest as described above. On December 18, 2002, we sold all of our Class A common stock of Genuity. We now own a voting and economic interest in Genuity of less than one-hundredth of 1%. Our commercial relationship with Level 3 Communications, Inc. (Level 3), the purchaser of substantially all of Genuity’s domestic assets and the assignee of Genuity’s principal contract with us, con- tinues including a multi-year purchase commitment expiring on December 31, 2005 for services such as dedicated Internet access, managed web hosting, Internet security and some transport services. Under this purchase commitment, Verizon has agreed to pay Level 3 a minimum of approximately $250 million after February 4, 2003. Pursuant to an agreement reached with most bank lenders to Genuity, we agreed to subordinate our $1,150 million loan to Genuity to the loans made by the banks to Genuity. In addition, we pur- chased participation in the amount of $182 million in the loans made by the banks to Genuity. Depending on the amounts available to pay creditors of Genuity, Verizon may or may not recover all of this par- ticipation. Consequently, we recorded a charge of $182 million in connection with losses recorded in 2002 related to our investment in Genuity (see “Special and Non-Recurring Items – Investment- Related Charges”). Recent Developments Verizon Wireless FCC Auction On January 29, 2001, the bidding phase of the FCC reauction of 1.9 GHz C and F block broadband Personal Communications Services (PCS) spectrum licenses, which began December 12, 2000, officially ended. Verizon Wireless was the winning bidder for 113 licenses. The total price of these licenses was $8,781 million, $1,822 million of which had been paid. There were no legal challenges to our qualifi- cations to acquire these licenses. We were awarded 33 of the 113 licenses in August 2001 and paid approximately $82 million for them. However, the remaining licenses for which we were the high bidder have been the subject of litigation by the original licensees, whose licenses had been cancelled by the FCC. In March 2002, the FCC 32 ordered a refund of 85% of the payments. In December 2002, pur- suant to an FCC order, we dismissed our applications for these licenses, received our remaining payment and were relieved of all of our remaining obligations with respect to the FCC reauction. On January 27, 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the FCC’s can- cellation of the licenses violated federal bankruptcy law. Timing of Initial Public Offering Since August 2000, when the Verizon Wireless Inc. registration state- ment was initially filed with the SEC, we periodically reiterated that the initial public offering would occur when market conditions are favorable. On January 29, 2003, Verizon Wireless withdrew the regis- tration statement because it currently does not have significant funding requirements that need to be addressed. Northcoast Spectrum Purchase In December 2002, Verizon Wireless announced that it signed an agreement with Northcoast Communications LLC to purchase 50 PCS licenses and related network assets for approximately $750 mil- lion. The licenses cover large portions of the U.S. including such markets as New York, NY, Boston, MA, Minneapolis, MN, Columbus, OH, Providence, RI, Rochester, NY and Hartford, CT. The transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2003. New York Recovery Funding In August 2002, President Bush signed the Supplemental Appropriations bill passed earlier this year by the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. The Supplemental Appropriations bill includes $5.5 billion in New York recovery funding. Of that amount, approximately $750 million has been allocated to cover the uninsured losses of businesses (including the restoration of utility infrastructure) as a result of the September 11th terrorist attacks. These funds will be distributed through the lower Manhattan Development Corporation following an application process. Regulatory and Competitive Trends Competition and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 We face increasing competition in all areas of our business. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996 Act), regulatory and judicial actions and the development of new technologies, products and services have created opportunities for alternative telecommunica- tion service providers, many of which are subject to fewer regulatory constraints. Current and potential competitors in telecommunications services include long distance companies, other local telephone companies, cable companies, wireless service providers, foreign telecommunications providers, electric utilities, Internet service providers and other companies that offer network services. Many of these companies have a strong market presence, brand recognition and existing customer relationships, all of which contribute to inten- sifying competition and may affect our future revenue growth. We are unable to predict definitively the impact that the ongoing changes in the telecommunications industry will ultimately have on our business, results of operations or financial condition. The finan- cial impact will depend on several factors, including the timing, extent and success of competition in our markets, the timing and outcome of various regulatory proceedings and any appeals, and the timing, extent and success of our pursuit of new opportunities resulting from the 1996 Act and technological advances. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED In-Region Long Distance We offer long distance service throughout most of the country, except in Maryland, West Virginia and the District of Columbia where we have not yet received authority to offer long distance service under the 1996 Act, and in Alaska. Under the 1996 Act, our ability to offer in-region long distance services in the regions where the former Bell Atlantic telephone subsidiaries operate as local exchange carri- ers is largely dependent on satisfying specified requirements. The requirements include a 14-point “competitive checklist” of steps which we must take to help competitors offer local services through resale, through purchase of unbundled network elements, or by inter- connecting their own networks to ours. We must also demonstrate to the FCC that our entry into the in-region long distance market would be in the public interest. We now have authority to offer in-region long distance service in 11 states in the former Bell Atlantic territory, accounting for approxi- mately 90% of the lines served by the former Bell Atlantic. These states are New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Maine, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Delaware and Virginia. The Pennsylvania and New Jersey orders are currently on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals. The U.S. Court of Appeals has remanded the Massachusetts order to the FCC for fur- ther explanation on one issue, but left our long distance authority in effect. In December 2002, we filed an application with the FCC for permission to enter the in-region long distance market in Maryland, West Virginia and the District of Columbia. The FCC must act on this application by March 19, 2003. FCC Regulation and Interstate Rates Our telephone operations are subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC with respect to interstate services and related matters. In 2002, the FCC continued to implement reforms to the interstate access charge system and to implement the “universal service” and other require- ments of the 1996 Act. Access Charges and Universal Service On May 31, 2000, the FCC adopted the CALLS plan as a compre- hensive five-year plan for regulation of interstate access charges. The CALLS plan has three main components. First, it establishes a portable interstate access universal service support of $650 million for the industry. This explicit support replaces implicit support embedded in interstate access charges. Second, the plan simplifies the patchwork of common line charges into one subscriber line charge (SLC) and provides for de-averaging of the SLC by zones and class of customers in a manner that will not undermine comparable and affordable universal service. Third, the plan sets into place a mechanism to transition to a set target of $0.0055 per minute for switched access services. Once that target rate is reached, local exchange carriers are no longer required to make further annual price cap reductions to their switched access prices. The annual reduc- tions leading to the target rate, as well as annual reductions for the subset of special access services that remain subject to price cap regulation was set at 6.5% per year. On September 10, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled on an appeal of the FCC order adopting the plan. The court upheld the FCC on several challenges to the order, but remanded two aspects of the decision back to the FCC on the grounds that they lacked sufficient justification. The court remanded back to the FCC for further consideration its decision setting the annual reduction factor at 6.5% minus an inflation factor and the size of the new universal service fund at $650 million. The entire plan (including these elements) will continue in effect pending the FCC’s further considera- tion of its justification of these components. As a result of tariff adjustments which became effective in July 2002, approximately 98% of our access lines reached the $0.0055 benchmark. The FCC has adopted rules for special access services that provide for pricing flexibility and ultimately the removal of services from price regulation when prescribed competitive thresholds are met. In order to use these rules, carriers must forego the ability to take advantage of provisions in the current rules that provide relief in the event earn- ings fall below prescribed thresholds. We have been authorized to remove special access and dedicated transport services from price caps in 36 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in the former Bell Atlantic territory and in 17 additional MSAs in the former GTE territory. In addition, the FCC has found that in 20 MSAs we have met the stricter standards to remove special access connections to end-user customers from price caps. Approximately 55% of special access revenues are now removed from price regulation. We also have an application pending that, if granted, would remove an additional three MSAs, and special access connections to end-user customers in two additional MSAs, from price cap regulation. In November 1999, the FCC adopted a new mechanism for providing universal service support to high cost areas served by large local telephone companies. This funding mechanism provides additional support for local telephone services in several states served by our telephone operations. This system has been supplemented by the new FCC access charge plan described above. On July 31, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed and remanded to the FCC for further proceedings. The court concluded that the FCC had failed to adequately explain some aspects of its decision and had failed to address any need for a state universal service mecha- nism. The current universal service mechanism remains in place pending the outcome of any FCC review as a result of these appeals. Unbundling of Network Elements In November 1999, the FCC announced its decision setting forth new unbundling requirements, eliminating elements that it had previously required to be unbundled, limiting the obligation to provide others and adding new elements. In addition to the unbundling requirements released in November 1999, the FCC released an order in a separate proceeding in December 1999, requiring incumbent local exchange companies also to unbundle and provide to competitors the higher frequency portion of their local loop. This provides competitors with the ability to provi- sion data services on top of incumbent carriers’ voice services. In July 2000, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit found that some aspects of the FCC’s requirements for pricing UNEs were inconsistent with the 1996 Act. In particular, it found that the FCC was wrong to require incumbent carriers to base these prices not on their real costs but on the imaginary costs of the most efficient equip- ment and the most efficient network configuration. This portion of the court’s decision was stayed pending review by the U.S. Supreme 33 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION CONTINUED Court. On May 13, 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed that deci- sion and upheld the FCC’s pricing rules. On May 24, 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit released an order that overturned the most recent FCC decision establishing which network elements were required to be unbun- dled. In particular, the court found that the FCC did not adequately consider the limitations of the “necessary and impair” standards of the 1996 Act when it chose national rules for unbundling and that it failed to consider the relevance of competition from other types of service providers, including cable and satellite. The court also vacated a separate order that had authorized an unbundling requirement for “line sharing” where a competing carrier purchases only a portion of the copper connection to the end-user in order to provide high- speed broadband services using DSL technology. Several parties, including the FCC, petitioned the court for rehearing of the court order. The court rejected the petitions that asked it to change its decision on September 4, 2002. The court did, however, stay its order vacating the FCC’s rules until February 20, 2003, to provide the FCC time to complete an ongoing rulemaking to determine what elements should be unbundled. Several carriers have sought U.S. Supreme Court review of the underlying court decision. That request remains pending. On October 25, 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit released an order upholding the FCC’s decisions that established interim limits on the availability of combinations of unbundled net- work elements known as enhanced extended links or “EELs.” EELs consist of unbundled loops and transport elements. The FCC deci- sions limited access to EELs to carriers that would use them to provide a significant amount of local traffic, and not just use them as substitutes for special access services. Prior to the issuance of these orders from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, the FCC had already begun a review of the scope of its unbundling requirement through a rulemaking referred to as the triennial review of UNEs. This rulemaking reopens the question of what network elements must be made available on an unbundled basis under the 1996 Act and will revisit the unbundling decisions made in the order overturned by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. In this rulemaking, the FCC also will address other pend- ing issues relating to unbundled elements, including the question of whether competing carriers may substitute combinations of unbun- dled loops and transport for already competitive special access services. On February 20, 2003, the FCC announced a decision in its triennial review, but the order has not yet been released. Compensation for Internet Traffic On April 27, 2001, the FCC released an order addressing intercarrier compensation for dial-up connections for Internet-bound traffic. The FCC found that Internet-bound traffic is interstate and subject to the FCC’s jurisdiction. Moreover, the FCC again found that Internet- bound traffic is not subject to reciprocal compensation under Section 251(b)(5) of the 1996 Act. Instead, the FCC established federal rates per minute for this traffic that decline from $0.0015 to $0.0007 over a three-year period. The FCC order also sets caps on the total minutes of this traffic that may be subject to any intercarrier compensation and requires that incumbent local exchange carriers must offer to pay reciprocal compensation for local traffic at the same rate as they are 34 required to pay on Internet-bound traffic. On May 3, 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected part of the FCC’s ration- ale for its April 27, 2001 order, but declined to vacate the order while it is on remand. Several parties requested rehearing, asking the court to vacate the underlying order. Those requests were denied in a series of orders released on September 24, 2002 and September 25, 2002. One car- rier has sought U.S. Supreme Court review of that denial. In the meantime, pending further action by the FCC, the FCC’s underlying order remains in effect. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD- LOOKING STATEMENTS In this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition, and elsewhere in this Annual Report, we have made forward-looking statements. These state- ments are based on our estimates and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations. Forward-looking statements also include those preceded or followed by the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “hopes” or similar expressions. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements con- tained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The following important factors, along with those discussed else- where in this Annual Report, could affect future results and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements: • the duration and extent of the current economic downturn; • materially adverse changes in economic or labor conditions in the markets served by us or by companies in which we have substan- tial investments; • material changes in available technology; • technology substitution; • an adverse change in the ratings afforded our debt securities by nationally accredited ratings organizations; • the final results of federal and state regulatory proceedings con- cerning our provision of retail and wholesale services and judicial review of those results; • the effects of competition in our markets; • our ability to satisfy regulatory merger conditions; • the ability of Verizon Wireless to continue to obtain sufficient spec- trum resources; • our ability to recover insurance proceeds relating to equipment losses and other adverse financial impacts resulting from the ter- rorist attacks on September 11, 2001; and • changes in our accounting assumptions that regulatory agencies, including the SEC, may require or that result from changes in the accounting rules or their application, which could result in an impact on earnings. REPORT OF MANAGEMENT REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We, the management of Verizon Communications Inc., are responsi- ble for the consolidated financial statements and the information and representations contained in this report. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted account- ing principles and include amounts based on management’s best estimates and judgments. Financial information elsewhere in this report is consistent with that in the financial statements. Management has established and maintained a system of internal control which is designed to provide reasonable assurance that errors or irregularities that could be material to the financial state- ments are prevented or would be detected within a timely period. The system of internal control includes widely communicated statements of policies and business practices, which are designed to require all employees to maintain high ethical standards in the conduct of our business. The internal controls are augmented by organizational arrangements that provide for appropriate delegation of authority and division of responsibility and by a program of internal audits. The 2002, 2001 and 2000 financial statements have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors. Their audits were con- ducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and included an evaluation of our internal control structure and selective tests of transactions. The Report of Independent Auditors follows this report. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of outside directors, meets periodically with the independent auditors, management and internal auditors to review accounting, auditing, internal controls, litigation and financial reporting matters. Both the internal auditors and the independent auditors have free access to the Audit Committee without management present. Ivan G. Seidenberg President and Chief Executive Officer Doreen A. Toben Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer John F. Killian Senior Vice President and Controller To the Board of Directors and Shareowners of Verizon Communications Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Verizon Communications Inc. and subsidiaries (Verizon) as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated state- ments of income, cash flows and changes in shareowners’ investment for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of Verizon’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards gen- erally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Verizon at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, Verizon changed its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” effective January 1, 2002, and as discussed in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, Verizon changed its method of accounting for derivative instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities” effective January 1, 2001. Ernst & Young LLP New York, New York January 29, 2003 35 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME Years Ended December 31, Operating Revenues Operating Expenses Operations and support expense (exclusive of items shown below) Depreciation and amortization Sales of assets, net Total Operating Expenses Operating Income Income (loss) from unconsolidated businesses Other income and (expense), net Interest expense Minority interest Mark-to-market adjustment – financial instruments Income before provision for income taxes, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change Provision for income taxes Income Before Extraordinary Items and Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change Extraordinary items, net of tax Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax Net Income Redemption of subsidiary preferred stock Net Income Available to Common Shareowners Basic Earnings Per Common Share: Income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change Extraordinary items, net of tax Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax Net Income Weighted-average shares outstanding (in millions) Diluted Earnings Per Common Share: Income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change Extraordinary items, net of tax Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax Net Income Weighted-average shares outstanding (in millions) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 2002 $ 67,625 (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 2000 2001 $ 67,190 $ 64,707 41,952 13,423 (2,747) 52,628 14,997 (4,414) 140 (3,237) (1,270) (14) 6,202 1,618 4,584 (9) (496) 4,079 – 4,079 1.67 – (.18) 1.49 2,729 1.67 – (.18) 1.49 2,745 $ $ $ $ $ 41,651 13,657 350 55,658 11,532 (5,042) 449 (3,369) (622) (182) 2,766 2,176 590 (19) (182) 389 – 389 .22 (.01) (.07) .14 2,710 .22 (.01) (.07) .14 2,730 $ $ $ $ $ 39,481 12,261 (3,793) 47,949 16,758 3,792 311 (3,490) (216) 664 17,819 7,009 10,810 1,027 (40) 11,797 (10) 11,787 3.98 .37 (.01) 4.34 2,713 3.95 .37 (.01) 4.31 2,737 $ $ $ $ $ 36 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS At December 31, Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $2,782 and $2,153 Inventories Net assets held for sale Prepaid expenses and other Total current assets Plant, property and equipment Less accumulated depreciation Investments in unconsolidated businesses Intangible assets, net Other assets Total assets Liabilities and Shareowners’ Investment Current liabilities Debt maturing within one year Accounts payable and accrued liabilities Other Total current liabilities Long-term debt Employee benefit obligations Deferred income taxes Other liabilities Minority interest Shareowners’ investment Series preferred stock ($.10 par value; none issued) Common stock ($.10 par value; 2,751,650,484 shares issued in both periods) Contributed capital Reinvested earnings Accumulated other comprehensive loss Less common stock in treasury, at cost Less deferred compensation-employee stock ownership plans and other Total shareowners’ investment Total liabilities and shareowners’ investment See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 2001 2002 $ 1,438 2,042 12,598 1,502 – 3,341 20,921 178,028 103,532 74,496 4,988 46,739 20,324 $ 167,468 $ 9,288 12,745 5,014 27,047 44,791 15,390 19,468 4,015 24,141 – 275 24,685 10,536 (2,110) 33,386 218 552 32,616 $ 167,468 $ 979 1,991 14,254 1,968 1,199 2,796 23,187 169,586 95,167 74,419 10,202 44,262 18,725 $ 170,795 $ 18,669 13,947 5,404 38,020 45,657 11,898 16,543 3,989 22,149 – 275 24,676 10,704 (1,187) 34,468 1,182 747 32,539 $ 170,795 37 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Years Ended December 31, 2002 2001 (dollars in millions) 2000 Cash Flows from Operating Activities Income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change Adjustments to reconcile income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization Sales of assets, net Mark-to-market adjustment – financial instruments Employee retirement benefits Deferred income taxes Provision for uncollectible accounts (Income) loss from unconsolidated businesses Changes in current assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisition/disposition of businesses: Accounts receivable Inventories Other assets Accounts payable and accrued liabilities Other, net Net cash provided by operating activities Cash Flows from Investing Activities Capital expenditures Acquisitions, net of cash acquired, and investments Proceeds from disposition of businesses Proceeds from spectrum payment refund Purchases of short-term investments Proceeds from sale of short-term investments Other, net Net cash used in investing activities Cash Flows from Financing Activities Proceeds from long-term borrowings Repayments of long-term borrowings and capital lease obligations Increase (decrease) in short-term obligations, excluding current maturities Dividends paid Proceeds from sale of common stock Purchase of common stock for treasury Other, net Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, end of year See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. $ 4,584 $ 590 $ 10,810 13,423 (2,747) 14 (501) 1,722 2,905 4,414 (989) 469 24 (1,304) 86 22,100 (11,984) (1,093) 4,638 1,740 (2,099) 1,931 39 (6,828) 7,882 (8,460) (11,024) (4,200) 915 – 74 (14,813) 13,657 350 182 (1,327) 1,065 1,952 5,042 (2,379) (47) (396) 420 664 19,773 (17,371) (3,142) 415 – (2,002) 1,595 (1,121) (21,626) 14,199 (7,589) (546) (4,168) 501 (18) (304) 2,075 459 979 1,438 $ 222 757 979 $ $ 12,261 (3,793) (664) (3,340) 3,434 1,409 (3,792) (2,440) (530) (264) 1,973 763 15,827 (17,633) (2,247) 6,794 – (1,204) 983 (2,748) (16,055) 8,781 (7,238) 3,515 (4,421) 576 (2,294) 33 (1,048) (1,276) 2,033 757 38 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREOWNERS’ INVESTMENT VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Shares 2,751,650 – – 2,751,650 35,173 – (26,531) (18) 8,624 Years Ended December 31, Common Stock Balance at beginning of year Shares issued-employee plans Shares retired Balance at end of year Contributed Capital Balance at beginning of year Shares issued-employee plans Shares retired Issuance of stock by subsidiaries Tax benefit from exercise of stock options Gain on formation of wireless joint venture Other Balance at end of year Reinvested Earnings Balance at beginning of year Net income Dividends declared ($1.54, $1.54, and $1.54 per share) Shares issued-employee plans Other Balance at end of year Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Balance at beginning of year Foreign currency translation adjustment Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities Unrealized derivative gains (losses) on cash flow hedges Minimum pension liability adjustment Other comprehensive income (loss) Balance at end of year Treasury Stock Balance at beginning of year Shares purchased Shares distributed Employee plans Shareowner plans Balance at end of year Deferred Compensation–ESOPs and Other Balance at beginning of year Amortization Other Balance at end of year Total Shareowners’ Investment Comprehensive Income Net income Other comprehensive income (loss) per above Total Comprehensive Income See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 2002 Amount (dollars in millions, except per share amounts, and shares in thousands) 2000 Amount 2001 Amount Shares Shares $ $ 275 – – 275 2,751,650 – – 2,751,650 $ 275 – – 275 2,756,485 5,533 (10,368) 2,751,650 276 – (1) 275 24,676 – – – 46 – (37) 24,685 10,704 4,079 (4,208) (48) 9 10,536 (1,187) 220 (304) 12 (851) (923) (2,110) 1,182 – (963) (1) 218 747 (150) (45) 552 $ 32,616 $ $ 4,079 (923) 3,156 24,555 – – – 101 – 20 24,676 14,667 389 (4,176) (188) 12 10,704 (2,176) (40) 1,061 (45) 13 989 (1,187) 1,861 18 (694) (3) 1,182 882 (155) 20 747 $ 32,539 $ $ 389 989 1,378 49,215 395 (14,376) (61) 35,173 23,569 35,110 (9,444) (20) 49,215 20,134 473 (577) 171 66 4,271 17 24,555 7,428 11,797 (4,416) (160) 18 14,667 75 (262) (1,965) – (24) (2,251) (2,176) 640 1,717 (495) (1) 1,861 897 (155) 140 882 $ 34,578 $ 11,797 (2,251) 9,546 $ 39 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1 DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Description of Business Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon) is one of the world’s leading providers of communications services. Our company is the largest provider of wireline and wireless communications in the United States. Our global presence extends to 32 countries in the Americas, Europe, Asia and the Pacific. We have four reportable segments, which we operate and manage as strategic business units: Domestic Telecom, Domestic Wireless, International and Information Services. For further information concerning our busi- ness segments, see Note 20. Consolidation The method of accounting applied to investments, whether consoli- dated, equity or cost, involves an evaluation of all significant terms of the investments that explicitly grant or suggest evidence of control or influence over the operations of the investee. The consolidated finan- cial statements include our controlled subsidiaries. Investments in businesses which we do not control, but have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies, are accounted for using the equity method. Investments in which we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for under the cost method. Equity and cost method investments are included in Investments in Unconsolidated Businesses in our consolidated balance sheets. Certain of our cost method investments are classified as available- for-sale securities and adjusted to fair value pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Use of Estimates We prepare our financial statements using generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Examples of significant estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts, the recoverability of intangibles and other long-lived assets, valuation allowances on tax assets and pension and postre- tirement benefit assumptions. Revenue Recognition We recognize wireline and wireless service revenues based upon usage of our network and facilities and contract fees. We recognize product and other service revenues when the products are deliv- ered and accepted by the customers and when services are provided in accordance with contract terms. The sale of wireless handsets and service revenues are separate earnings processes and revenues associated with each are recorded separately. We recognize directory revenues, and associated costs, when the directories are published. 40 VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES We adopted the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” effective January 1, 2000, as required by the SEC. The impact to Verizon pertains to the deferral of some non-recurring fees, such as service activation and installation fees, and associated incremental direct costs, and the recognition of those revenues and costs over the expected term of the customer relationship. The total cumulative effect of adopting SAB No. 101 was a non-cash, after-tax charge of $40 million. Maintenance and Repairs We charge the cost of maintenance and repairs, including the cost of replacing minor items not constituting substantial betterments, to Operations and Support Expense as these costs are incurred. Earnings Per Common Share Basic earnings per common share are based on the weighted-aver- age number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of shares issuable under our stock-based compensation plans and an exchangeable equity interest (see Note 6), which represent the only potentially dilutive common shares. Cash and Cash Equivalents We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of 90 days or less when purchased to be cash equivalents, except cash equiva- lents held as short-term investments. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market value. Short-Term Investments Our short-term investments consist primarily of cash equivalents held in trust to pay for certain employee benefits. Short-term investments are stated at cost, which approximates market value. Marketable Securities We continually evaluate our investments in marketable securities for impairment due to declines in market value considered to be other than temporary. That evaluation includes, in addition to persistent, declining stock prices, general economic and company-specific eval- uations. In the event of a determination that a decline in market value is other than temporary, a charge to earnings is recorded for the loss, and a new cost basis in the investment is established. These invest- ments are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in Investments in Unconsolidated Businesses or Other Assets. Inventories We include in inventory new and reusable supplies and network equipment of our telephone operations, which are stated principally at average original cost, except that specific costs are used in the case of large individual items. Inventories of our other subsidiaries are stated at the lower of cost (determined principally on either an aver- age cost or first-in, first-out basis) or market. Plant and Depreciation We record plant, property and equipment at cost. Our telephone operations’ depreciation expense is principally based on the com- posite group remaining life method and straight-line composite rates. This method provides for the recognition of the cost of the remaining net investment in telephone plant, less anticipated net salvage value, over the remaining asset lives. This method requires the periodic revi- sion of depreciation rates. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED The asset lives used by our telephone operations are presented in the following table: Average Lives (in years) Buildings Central office equipment Outside communications plant Furniture, vehicles and other 30-35 5-10 14-50 3-15 When we replace or retire depreciable plant used in our wireline net- work, we deduct the carrying amount of such plant from the respective accounts and charge it to accumulated depreciation. See “Recent Accounting Pronouncements – Asset Retirement Obligations” for additional information. Plant, property and equipment of our other subsidiaries is generally depreciated on a straight-line basis over the following estimated use- ful lives: buildings, 20 to 40 years; wireless plant equipment, 3 to 15 years; and other equipment, 1 to 20 years. When the depreciable assets of our other subsidiaries are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated deprecia- tion are deducted from the plant accounts, and any gains or losses on disposition are recognized in income. We capitalize interest associated with the acquisition or construction of plant assets. Capitalized interest is reported as a cost of plant and a reduction in interest cost. Computer Software Costs We capitalize the cost of internal-use software which has a useful life in excess of one year in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) No. 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.” Subsequent additions, modifications or upgrades to internal-use software are capitalized only to the extent that they allow the software to perform a task it pre- viously did not perform. Software maintenance and training costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Also, we capitalize interest associated with the development of internal-use software. Capitalized computer software costs are amortized using the straight-line method over a period of 3 to 7 years. Goodwill and Other Intangibles Goodwill is the excess of the acquisition cost of businesses over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and, as required, we no longer amortize goodwill (including goodwill recorded on our equity method investments), acquired workforce intangible assets and wireless licenses, which we have determined have an indefinite life. These assets are reviewed annually (or more frequently under various conditions) for impairment using a fair value approach. Intangible assets that do not have indefinite lives are amortized over their useful lives and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” For additional information on the impact of adopting SFAS No. 142, see Note 2. Prior to January 1, 2002, we generally amortized goodwill, wireless licenses and other identifiable intangibles on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life, not exceeding 40 years. We assessed the impairment of other identifiable intangibles and goodwill related to our consolidated subsidiaries under SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of,” whenever events or changes in circumstances indi- cated that the carrying value may not have been recoverable. A determination of impairment (if any) was made based on estimates of future cash flows. In instances where goodwill was recorded for assets that were subject to an impairment loss, the carrying amount of the goodwill was eliminated before any reduction was made to the carrying amounts of impaired long-lived assets and identifiable intan- gibles. On a quarterly basis, we assessed the impairment of enterprise level goodwill under Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 17, “Intangible Assets.” A determination of impairment (if any) was made based primarily on estimates of market value. Sale of Stock By Subsidiary We recognize in consolidation changes in our ownership percentage in a subsidiary caused by issuances of the subsidiary’s stock as adjustments to Contributed Capital. Income Taxes Verizon and its domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. For periods prior to the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger (see Note 7), GTE filed a separate consolidated federal income tax return. Our telephone operations use the deferral method of accounting for investment tax credits earned prior to the repeal of investment tax credits by the Tax Reform Act of 1986. We also defer certain transi- tional credits earned after the repeal. We amortize these credits over the estimated service lives of the related assets as a reduction to the Provision for Income Taxes. Stock-Based Compensation We have historically accounted for stock-based employee compen- sation plans under APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations, and followed the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock- Based Compensation.” Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, prospectively (as permitted under SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure”) to all new awards granted, modified or settled after January 1, 2003. See Note 17 for additional information. Foreign Currency Translation The functional currency for nearly all of our foreign operations is the local currency. For these foreign entities, we translate income state- ment amounts at average exchange rates for the period, and we translate assets and liabilities at end-of-period exchange rates. We in Accumulated Other record these translation adjustments Comprehensive Loss, a separate component of Shareowners’ Investment, in our consolidated balance sheets. We report exchange gains and losses on intercompany foreign currency transactions of a long-term nature in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. Other exchange gains and losses are reported in income. 41 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED When a foreign entity operates in a highly inflationary economy, we use the U.S. dollar as the functional currency rather than the local currency. We translate nonmonetary assets and liabilities and related expenses into U.S. dollars at historical exchange rates. We trans- late all other income statement amounts using average exchange rates for the period. Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at end-of-period exchange rates, and any gains or losses are reported in income. Employee Benefit Plans Pension and postretirement health care and life insurance benefits earned during the year as well as interest on projected benefit obli- gations are accrued currently. Prior service costs and credits resulting from changes in plan benefits are amortized over the average remain- ing service period of the employees expected to receive benefits. Derivative Instruments We have entered into derivative transactions to manage our expo- sure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices. We employ risk management strategies using a variety of derivatives including foreign currency forwards and options, equity options, interest rate swap agreements, interest rate caps and floors, and basis swap agreements. We do not hold deriv- atives for trading purposes. Effective January 1, 2001, we adopted SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 133 requires that all derivatives, including derivatives embedded in other financial instruments, be measured at fair value and recognized as either assets or liabilities on our balance sheet. Changes in the fair values of derivative instru- ments not qualifying as hedges under SFAS No. 133 or any ineffective portion of hedges are recognized in earnings in the cur- rent period. Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments used effectively as fair value hedges are recognized in earnings, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged item. Changes in the fair value of the effective portions of cash flow hedges are reported in other comprehensive income (loss), and recognized in earnings when the hedged item is recognized in earnings. included investments were Prior to January 1, 2001, foreign currency derivatives and basis swap agreements were accounted for under the fair value method which required us to record these derivatives at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets, with any changes in value recorded in income or Shareowners’ Investment. Gains, losses and related discounts or premiums related to foreign currency derivatives that hedged our investments in consolidated foreign subsidiaries or foreign equity method in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and reflected in income upon sale or substan- tial liquidation of the investment. Gains or losses from foreign currency derivatives that hedged our short-term transactions and cost method investments were included in Other Income and (Expense), Net, and discounts or premiums on these contracts were included in income over the lives of the contracts. Gains or losses from identifiable foreign currency commitments were deferred and recognized in income when the future transaction occurred or at the time the transaction was no longer likely to occur. Interest rate swap agreements and interest rate caps and floors that qualified as hedges were accounted for under the accrual method. Under the accrual 42 method, no amounts were recognized in our consolidated balance sheets related to the principal balances. The interest differential that was paid or received and the premiums related to caps and floors were recognized as adjustments to Interest Expense over the life of the agreements. Gains or losses on terminated agreements were recorded as an adjustment to the basis of the underlying liability and amortized over the original life of the agreement. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Exit or Disposal Activities In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in Restructuring).” EITF Issue No. 94-3 required accrual of liabilities related to exit and disposal activities at a plan (commitment) date. SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. The provisions of this statement are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. Asset Retirement Obligations On January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” This statement provides the account- ing for the cost of legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 143 requires that companies recognize the fair value of a liability for asset retirement obligations in the period in which the obligations are incurred and capitalize that amount as part of the book value of the long-lived asset. We have determined that Verizon does not have a material legal obligation to remove long- lived assets as described by this statement. However, we have included estimated removal costs in our group depreciation models. These costs have increased depreciation expense and accumulated depreciation for future removal costs for existing assets. These removal costs are recorded as a reduction to accumulated deprecia- tion when the assets are retired and removal costs are incurred. For some assets, such as telephone poles, the removal costs exceed salvage value. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 143, we are required to exclude costs of removal from our depreciation rates for assets for which the removal costs exceed salvage. Accordingly, in connection with the initial adoption of this standard on January 1, 2003, we have reversed accrued costs of removal in excess of salvage from our accumulated depreciation accounts for these assets. The adjustment was recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change, result- ing in the recognition of an estimated gain of approximately $3.4 billion ($2.0 billion after-tax). Effective January 1, 2003, we began expensing costs of removal in excess of salvage for these assets as incurred. The impact of this change in accounting will result in a decrease in depreciation expense and an increase in operational and support expenses. We estimate the net favorable impact in 2003, excluding the cumulative effect adjustment, will be approximately $50 million to $70 million ($30 million to $42 million after-tax). NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED NOTE 2 ACCOUNTING CHANGE – GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS The initial impact of adopting SFAS No. 142 on our consolidated financial statements was recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change as of January 1, 2002, resulting in a charge of $496 million, net of tax. This charge is comprised of $204 million ($203 million after-tax) for goodwill and $294 million ($293 million after-tax) for wireless licenses and goodwill of equity method invest- ments and for other intangible assets. Domestic Wireless Licenses In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS No. 142, we have reassessed the useful lives of previously recognized intangible assets. A significant portion of our intangible assets are Domestic Wireless licenses, including licenses associated with equity method investments, that provide our wireless operations with the exclusive right to utilize designated radio frequency spectrum to provide cellu- lar communication services. While licenses are issued for only a fixed time, generally ten years, such licenses are subject to renewal by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Renewals of licenses have occurred routinely and at nominal cost. Moreover, we have determined that there are currently no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors that limit the useful life of our wireless licenses. As a result, the wireless licenses will be treated as an indefinite-lived intangible asset under the provisions of SFAS No. 142 and will not be amortized but rather will be tested for impairment. We will reevaluate the useful life determination for wireless licenses each reporting period to determine whether events and circum- stances continue to support an indefinite useful life. Previous wireless business combinations have been for the purpose of acquiring existing licenses and related infrastructure to enable us to build out our existing nationwide wireless network. The primary asset acquired in such combinations has been wireless licenses. In the allocation of the purchase price of these previous acquisitions, amounts classified as goodwill have related predominately to the expected synergies of placing the acquired licenses in our national footprint. Further, in purchase accounting, the values assigned to both wireless licenses and goodwill were principally determined based on an allocation of the excess of the purchase price over the other acquired net assets. We believe that the nature of our wireless licenses and related goodwill are fundamentally indistinguishable. In light of these considerations, on January 1, 2002, amounts previ- ously classified as goodwill, approximately $7.9 billion as of December 31, 2001, were reclassified into wireless licenses. Also, assembled workforce, previously included in other intangible assets, will no longer be recognized separately from wireless licenses. Amounts for 2001 and 2000 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted on January 1, 2002. In conjunction with this reclassification, and in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” we have recognized in the first quarter of 2002 a deferred tax liability of approximately $1.6 billion related to the difference in the tax basis compared to the book basis of the wireless licenses. This reclassification, including the related impact on deferred taxes, had no impact on our results of operations. When testing the carrying value of the wireless licenses for impair- ment, we will determine the fair value of the aggregated wireless licenses by subtracting from wireless operations’ estimated discounted cash flows the fair value of all of the other net tangible and intangible assets of our wireless operations. If the fair value of the aggregated wireless licenses as determined above is less than the aggregated carrying amount of the licenses, an impairment will be recognized. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, a test for impairment of wireless licenses was performed with no impairment recognized. Future tests for impairment will be performed at least annually and more often if events or circumstances warrant. Impact of SFAS No. 142 The following tables present the impact of SFAS No. 142 on reported income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change, reported net income and earnings per share had the standard been in effect for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000: Years Ended December 31, Reported income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change Goodwill amortization Wireless licenses amortization Adjusted income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 $ $ 4,584 – – 590 49 334 $ 10,810 40 263 $ 4,584 $ 973 $ 11,113 Years Ended December 31, 2002 2001 2000 Basic earnings per common share $ Goodwill amortization Wireless licenses amortization Adjusted earnings $ 1.67 – – $ .22 .02 .12 3.98 .01 .10 per common share – basic $ 1.67 $ .36 $ 4.09 Years Ended December 31, 2002 2001 2000 Diluted earnings per common share $ Goodwill amortization Wireless licenses amortization Adjusted earnings $ 1.67 – – $ .22 .02 .12 3.95 .01 .10 per common share – diluted $ 1.67 $ .36 $ 4.06 Years Ended December 31, Reported net income Goodwill amortization Wireless licenses amortization Adjusted net income Years Ended December 31, Basic earnings per common share Goodwill amortization Wireless licenses amortization Adjusted earnings $ $ $ 2002 4,079 – – 4,079 2002 1.49 – – $ $ $ (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 389 49 334 772 $ 11,787 40 263 $ 12,090 2001 2000 $ .14 .02 .12 4.34 .01 .10 per common share – basic $ 1.49 $ .28 $ 4.45 Years Ended December 31, 2002 2001 2000 Diluted earnings per common share $ Goodwill amortization Wireless licenses amortization Adjusted earnings $ 1.49 – – $ .14 .02 .12 4.31 .01 .10 per common share – diluted $ 1.49 $ .28 $ 4.42 43 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED The preceding tables exclude $115 million ($.04 per share), and $76 million ($.03 per share) for the years ended 2001 and 2000, respectively, related to amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives of equity method investments. Goodwill Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2002 are as follows: Balance as of December 31, 2001 Goodwill reclassifications Goodwill acquired during the period CTI goodwill in impairment charge Goodwill impairment losses under SFAS No. 142 Balance as of December 31, 2002 (dollars in millions) Domestic Telecom Domestic Wireless International Information Services Corporate & Other $ $ 401 – 3 – (90) 314 $ $ – – – – – – $ $ 627 338 51 (220) – 796 $ $ 558 23 – – (2) 579 $ 112 – – – (112) – $ Total $ 1,698 361 54 (220) (204) $ 1,689 Other Intangible Assets The major components and average useful lives of our other acquired intangible assets follows: Amortized intangible assets: Customer lists (4 to 7 years) Non-network software (3 to 7 years) Other (2 to 30 years) Total Unamortized intangible assets: Wireless licenses As of December 31, 2002 Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount (dollars in millions) As of December 31, 2001 Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount $ $ 3,440 4,700 81 8,221 $ 40,088 $ $ 1,846 1,399 14 3,259 $ $ 3,349 3,187 74 6,610 $ 38,055 $ $ 1,279 793 29 2,101 Intangible asset amortization expense was $1,164 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. It is estimated to be $1,189 million in 2003, $1,143 million in 2004, $1,027 million in 2005, $602 million in 2006 and $265 million in 2007, primarily related to customer lists and non-net- work software. NOTE 3 SALES OF ASSETS, NET During 2002, we recognized net gains in operations related to sales of assets and other charges. During 2001, we recognized net losses in operations related to sales of assets, impairments of assets held for sale and other charges. During 2000, we recognized net gains related to sales of assets and impairments of assets held for sale. These net gains and losses are summarized as follows: Years Ended December 31, Wireline property (dollars in millions) 2002 Pretax After-tax 2001 Pretax After-tax 2000 Pretax After-tax sales $ 2,527 $ 1,550 $ – $ – $ 3,051 $ 1,856 Wireless overlap property sales Other, net – 220 1,156 (1,025) $ 2,747 $ 1,666 $ (350) $ (226) $ 3,793 $ 1,987 1,922 (1,180) (60) (166) (92) (258) – 116 As required, gains on sales of wireless overlap properties that occurred prior to the closing of the Bell Atlantic Corporation (Bell Atlantic)-GTE Corporation (GTE) merger are included in operating income and in the table above. Gains on sales of significant wireless 44 overlap properties that occurred after the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger are classified as extraordinary items. See Note 5 for gains on sales of significant wireless overlap properties subsequent to the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger. Wireline Property Sales In October 2001, we agreed to sell all 675,000 of our switched access lines in Alabama and Missouri to CenturyTel Inc. (CenturyTel) and 600,000 of our switched access lines in Kentucky to ALLTEL Corporation (ALLTEL). During the third quarter of 2002, we completed the sales of these access lines for $4,059 million in cash proceeds ($191 million of which was received in 2001). We recorded a pretax gain of $2,527 million ($1,550 million after-tax). For the years 2002, 2001 and 2000, the operating revenues of the access lines sold were $623 million, $997 million and $1,021 million, respectively. For the years 2002, 2001 and 2000, operating expenses of the access lines sold were $241 million, $413 million and $539 million, respectively. During 1998, GTE committed to sell approximately 1.6 million non- strategic domestic access lines. During 2000, access line sales generated combined cash proceeds of approximately $4,903 million and $125 million in convertible preferred stock. The pretax gain on the sales was $3,051 million ($1,856 million after-tax). The operating revenues and expenses of the access lines sold in 2000 were $766 million and $253 million, respectively. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED Wireless Overlap Property Sales A U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) consent decree issued on December 6, 1999 required GTE Wireless, Bell Atlantic Mobile, (Vodafone) and PrimeCo Personal Vodafone Group plc Communications L.P. (PrimeCo) to resolve a number of wireless mar- ket overlaps in order to complete the wireless joint venture and the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger. As a result, during April and June 2000 we completed transactions with ALLTEL that provided for the exchange of former Bell Atlantic Mobile and GTE Wireless markets for several of ALLTEL’s wireless markets. These exchanges were accounted for as purchase business combinations and resulted in combined pretax gains of $1,922 million ($1,156 million after-tax). During 2001, we recorded a pretax gain of $80 million ($48 million after-tax) on the sale of the Cincinnati wireless market and a pretax loss of $172 million ($108 million after-tax) related to the sale of the Chicago wireless market. Other Transactions In December 2001, we agreed to sell TSI Telecommunications Services Inc. (TSI). During 2002, we recorded a net pretax gain of $220 million ($116 million after-tax), primarily resulting from a pretax gain on the sale of TSI of $466 million ($275 million after-tax), par- tially offset by an impairment charge in connection with our exit from the video business and other charges of $246 million ($159 million after-tax). During 2001, we recorded charges totaling $258 million ($166 million after-tax) related to exiting several businesses, including our video business and some leasing activities. During 2000, we recorded charges related to the write-down of some impaired assets and other charges of $1,180 million ($1,025 million after-tax), as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2000 Pretax (dollars in millions) After-tax Airfone and Video impairment CLEC impairment Real estate consolidation and other merger-related charges Deferred taxes on contribution to the wireless joint venture Other, net $ 566 334 220 – 60 $ 1,180 $ 362 218 142 249 54 $ 1,025 In connection with our decisions to exit the video business and Airfone (a company involved in air-to-ground communications), in the second quarter of 2000 we recorded an impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of these investments to their estimated net realizable value. The competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC) impairment primarily relates to the revaluation of assets and the accrual of costs pertain- ing to some long-term contracts due to strategic changes in our approach to offering bundled services both in and out of franchise areas. The revised approach to providing such services resulted, in part, from post-merger integration activities and acquisitions. The real estate consolidation and other merger-related charges include the revaluation of assets and the accrual of costs to exit leased facilities that are in excess of our needs as the result of post- merger integration activities. The deferred tax charge is non-cash and was recorded as the result of the contribution in July 2000 of the GTE Wireless assets to Verizon Wireless based on the differences between the book and tax bases of assets contributed. Net Assets Held For Sale At December 31, 2001, the net assets of the switched access lines sold to CenturyTel and ALLTEL and the net assets of TSI were classi- fied as Net Assets Held for Sale in the consolidated balance sheets. NOTE 4 OTHER STRATEGIC ACTIONS Total pension and benefit costs recorded in 2002 related to sever- ances were $2,010 million ($1,264 million after taxes and minority interest). In the fourth quarter of 2002, we recorded a pretax charge of $981 million ($604 million after taxes and minority interest) primarily associated with pension and benefit costs related to severances. This charge included losses of $910 million ($558 million after-tax) recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits” and SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions.” These losses include curtailment losses of $755 million ($464 million after- tax) for significant reduction of the expected years of future service resulting from early retirements once the threshold for significance was reached, pension settlement losses of $102 million ($62 million after-tax) related to lump sum settlements of some existing pension obligations, and pension and postretirement benefit enhancements of $53 million ($32 million after-tax). The fourth quarter charge also included severance costs of $71 million ($46 million after taxes and minority interest). We also recorded a pretax charge in 2002 of $295 million ($185 million after-tax) related to settlement losses incurred in connection with previously announced employee separations. SFAS No. 88 requires that settlement losses be recorded once prescribed payment thresholds have been reached. Also during 2002, we recorded a special charge of $734 million ($475 million after taxes and minority interest) primarily associated with employee severance costs and severance-related activities in connection with the volun- tary and involuntary separation of approximately 8,000 employees. As of December 31, 2002, a total of over 20,000 employees have been separated under the 2001 and 2002 severance activity. We expect to complete the severance activities within a year of when the respective charges are recorded. During 2001, we recorded a special charge of $1,613 million ($1,001 million after-tax) primarily associated with employee severance costs and related pension enhancements. The charge included severance and related benefits of $765 million ($477 million after-tax) for the vol- untary and involuntary separation of approximately 10,000 employees. We also included a charge of $848 million ($524 million after-tax) primarily associated with related pension enhancements. In 2000, we recorded pension settlement gains of $911 million pretax ($564 million after-tax) in accordance with SFAS No. 88. They relate to some settlements of pension obligations for former GTE employees through direct payment, the purchase of annuities or otherwise. 45 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED During 2002, we recorded pretax charges of $593 million ($445 mil- lion after-tax) primarily related to a pretax impairment charge in connection with our financial statement exposure to WorldCom Inc. due to its July 2002 bankruptcy of $300 million ($183 million after- tax), a pretax impairment charge of $117 million ($136 million after-tax) pertaining to our leasing operations for airplanes leased to airlines currently experiencing financial difficulties and other pretax charges of $176 million ($126 million after-tax). In addition, we recorded a pretax charge of $175 million ($114 million after-tax) related to a settlement of a litigation matter that arose from our decision to terminate an agreement with NorthPoint Communications Group, Inc. (NorthPoint) to combine the two companies’ digital subscriber line (DSL) businesses (see Note 24). Other charges and special items recorded during 2001 include asset impairments related to property sales and facility consolidation of $151 million ($95 million after-tax). In 2001, we also recorded a loss of $35 million ($26 million after-tax) related to international losses. Other charges and special items recorded during 2000 included the write-off of our investment in NorthPoint of $155 million ($153 million after-tax) as a result of the deterioration in NorthPoint’s business, operations and financial condition. We also recorded a pretax charge of $50 million ($50 million after-tax) associated with our share of costs incurred at two of our international equity investees to com- plete employee separation programs. Other charges and special items in 2000 also included the cost of disposing or abandoning redundant assets and discontinued system development projects in connection with the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger of $287 million ($175 million after-tax), regulatory settlements of $98 million ($61 million after-tax) and other asset write-downs of $416 million ($290 million after-tax). NOTE 5 EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS In 2002, we recognized a net pretax extraordinary charge of $19 mil- lion ($9 million after-tax) related to the extinguishments of $2,306 million of debt prior to the stated maturity dates. During 2001, we retired $726 million of debt prior to the stated matu- rity date, resulting in a pretax extraordinary charge of $29 million ($19 million after-tax). In June 2000, we entered into a series of definitive sale agreements to resolve service area conflicts prohibited by FCC regulations as a result of the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger (see Note 3). These agree- ments, which were pursuant to the consent decree issued for the merger, enabled both the formation of Verizon Wireless and the clos- ing of the merger. Since the sales were required pursuant to the consent decree and occurred after the merger, the gains on sales were recorded net of taxes as Extraordinary Items in the consolidated statements of income. During the second half of 2000, we completed the sale of the Richmond (former PrimeCo) wireless market to CFW Communications Company in exchange for two wireless rural service areas in Virginia and cash. The sale resulted in a pretax gain of $184 million ($112 million after-tax). In addition, we completed the sales of the 46 consolidated markets in Washington and Texas and unconsolidated interests in Texas (former GTE) to SBC Communications. The sales resulted in a pretax gain of $886 million ($532 million after-tax). Also, we completed the sale of the San Diego (former GTE) market to AT&T Wireless. The sale resulted in a pretax gain of $304 million ($182 mil- lion after-tax). In 2000, we also completed the sale of the Houston (former PrimeCo) wireless overlap market to AT&T Wireless, resulting in a pretax gain of $350 million ($213 million after-tax). During 2000, we retired $190 million of debt prior to the stated matu- rity date, resulting in a pretax extraordinary charge of $19 million ($12 million after-tax). Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections,” and will no longer report extinguishments of debt as extraordinary items. NOTE 6 WIRELESS JOINT VENTURE On April 3, 2000, Verizon and Vodafone consummated the previously announced agreement to combine U.S. wireless and paging opera- tions. Vodafone contributed its U.S. wireless operations, including its interest in PrimeCo, to an existing Bell Atlantic partnership in exchange for a 65.1% economic interest in the partnership. Bell Atlantic retained a 34.9% economic interest and control pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement. We accounted for this transaction as a pur- chase business combination. The total consideration for the U.S. wireless operations of Vodafone was approximately $34 billion, result- ing in increases in intangible assets of approximately $31 billion, minority interest of approximately $21 billion and debt of approximately $4 billion included in the consolidated balance sheets. Since the acquisition was effected through the issuance of partnership interests, the $4,271 million after-tax gain on the transaction was reported as an adjustment to contributed capital in accordance with our accounting policy for recording gains on the issuance of subsidiary stock. The appraisal and the allocation of the purchase price to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets were completed in the fourth quarter of 2000. A substantial portion of the excess purchase prices over the tan- gible assets acquired were identified with wireless licenses, which as of January 1, 2002, are no longer being amortized since they are indefi- nite-lived assets under the provisions of SFAS No. 142 (see Note 2). In July 2000, following the closing of the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger, interests in GTE’s U.S. wireless operations were contributed to Verizon Wireless in exchange for an increase in our economic owner- ship interest to 55%. This transaction was accounted for as a transfer of assets between entities under common control and, accordingly, was recorded at the net book value of the assets contributed. In addition, under the terms of an investment agreement, Vodafone may require us or Verizon Wireless to purchase up to an aggregate of $20 billion worth of its interest in Verizon Wireless between 2003 and 2007 at its then fair market value. The purchase of up to $10 billion, in cash or stock at our option, may be required in the summer of 2003 or 2004, and the remainder, which may not exceed $10 billion at any one time, in the summers of 2005 through 2007. Vodafone has the option to require us or Verizon Wireless to satisfy up to $7.5 billion of the remainder with cash or contributed debt. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED In December 2001, Verizon Wireless and Price Communications Corp. (Price) announced that an agreement had been reached com- bining Price’s wireless business with a portion of Verizon Wireless in a transaction valued at approximately $1.7 billion, including $550 mil- lion of net debt. The transaction closed on August 15, 2002 and the assumed debt was redeemed on August 16, 2002. The resulting lim- ited partnership is controlled and managed by Verizon Wireless. In exchange for its contributed assets, Price received a limited partner- ship interest in the new partnership which is exchangeable into common stock of Verizon Wireless if an initial public offering of that stock occurs, or into the common stock of Verizon on the fourth anniversary of the asset contribution date if the initial public offering of Verizon Wireless common stock does not occur prior to then. The price of the Verizon common stock used in determining the number of Verizon common shares received in an exchange is also subject to a maximum and minimum amount. NOTE 7 COMPLETION OF MERGER On June 30, 2000, Bell Atlantic and GTE completed a merger under a definitive merger agreement dated as of July 27, 1998. Upon closing of the merger, the combined company began doing business as Verizon. GTE shareowners received 1.22 shares of Bell Atlantic com- mon stock for each share of GTE common stock that they owned. The merger qualified as a tax-free reorganization and has been accounted for as a pooling-of-interests business combination. Under this method of accounting, Bell Atlantic and GTE are treated as if they had always been combined for accounting and financial reporting purposes. As a result, we have restated our consolidated financial statements for all dates and periods prior to the merger to reflect the combined results of Bell Atlantic and GTE as of the beginning of the earliest period presented. In addition to combining the separate historical results of Bell Atlantic and GTE, the restated combined financial statements include the adjustments necessary to conform accounting methods and presentation, to the extent that they were different, and to elim- inate significant intercompany transactions. The separate Bell Atlantic and GTE results of operations for periods prior to the merger were as follows: Operating Revenues Bell Atlantic GTE Conforming adjustments, reclassifications and eliminations Accounting change Combined Net Income Bell Atlantic GTE Conforming adjustments, reclassifications and eliminations Accounting change Combined (dollars in millions) Three Months Ended March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) $ 8,534 6,100 (85) (17) $ 14,532 $ 731 807 19 (42) $ 1,515 The following table summarizes the pretax charges incurred for the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger. Years Ended December 31, Direct Incremental Costs Compensation arrangements Professional services Shareowner-related Registration, regulatory and other Total Direct Incremental Costs Employee Severance Costs Transition Costs Systems modifications Branding Relocation, training and other Total Transition Costs Total Merger-Related Costs 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 $ $ – $ – – – – – $ – – – – – – 210 161 35 66 472 584 283 99 401 10 240 112 217 355 526 510 694 1,039 510 $ 1,039 $ 1,750 Merger-Related Costs Direct Incremental Costs Direct incremental costs related to the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger of $472 million ($378 million after-tax) include compensation, profes- sional services and other costs. Compensation includes retention payments to employees that were contingent on the close of the merger and payments to employees to satisfy contractual obliga- tions triggered by the change in control. Professional services include investment banking, legal, accounting, consulting and other advisory fees incurred to obtain federal and state regulatory approvals and take other actions necessary to complete the merger. Other includes costs incurred to obtain shareholder approval of the merger, register securities and communicate with shareholders, employees and regulatory authorities regarding merger issues. All of the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger direct incremental costs had been paid as of December 31, 2001. Employee Severance Costs Employee severance costs related to the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger of $584 million ($371 million after-tax), as recorded under SFAS No. 112, “Employers’ Accounting for Postemployment Benefits,” repre- sent the benefit costs for the separation of approximately 5,500 management employees who were entitled to benefits under pre- existing separation plans, as well as an accrual for ongoing SFAS No. 112 obligations for GTE employees (see Note 18). Of these employees, approximately 5,200 were located in the United States and approximately 300 were located at various international loca- tions. The separations occurred as a result of consolidations and process enhancements within our operating segments. Accrued postemployment benefit liabilities for those employees are included in our consolidated balance sheets as components of Other Current Liabilities and Employee Benefit Obligations. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the remaining merger-related severance liability was $76 million and $343 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2002, the severances in connection with the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger are complete. Transition Costs In addition to the direct incremental merger-related and severance costs discussed above, we announced at the time of the Bell 47 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED Atlantic-GTE merger that we expected to incur a total of approxi- mately $2 billion of transition costs related to the merger and the formation of the wireless joint venture. These costs were incurred to integrate systems, consolidate real estate, and relocate employees. They also included approximately $500 million for advertising and other costs to establish the Verizon brand. Transition activities are complete at December 31, 2002 and totaled $2,243 million. Transition costs were $510 million ($288 million after taxes and minority interest) in 2002, $1,039 million ($578 million after taxes and minority interest) in 2001 and $694 million ($316 million after taxes and minority interest) in 2000. NOTE 8 MARKETABLE SECURITIES We have investments in marketable securities which are considered “available-for-sale” under SFAS No. 115. These investments have been included in our consolidated balance sheets in Investments in Unconsolidated Businesses and Other Assets. Under SFAS No. 115, available-for-sale securities are required to be carried at their fair value, with unrealized gains and losses (net of income taxes) that are considered temporary in nature recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. The fair values of our investments in marketable securities are determined based on mar- ket quotations. We continually evaluate our investments in marketable securities for impairment due to declines in market value considered to be other than temporary. That evaluation includes, in addition to persistent, declining stock prices, general economic and company-specific evaluations. In the event of a determination that a decline in market value is other than temporary, a charge to earnings is recorded in Income (Loss) From Unconsolidated Businesses in the consolidated statements of income for all or a portion of the unreal- ized loss, and a new cost basis in the investment is established. The following table shows certain summarized information related to our investments in marketable securities: (dollars in millions) At December 31, 2002 Investments in unconsolidated businesses Other assets At December 31, 2001 Investments in unconsolidated businesses Other assets Cost $ $ 115 196 311 $ 1,337 243 $ 1,580 Gross Gross Unrealized Unrealized Losses Gains Fair Value $ $ $ $ 5 46 51 578 26 604 $ $ $ $ (20) – (20) $ $ 100 242 342 (80) – (80) $ 1,835 269 $ 2,104 primarily bonds and mutual funds. At December 31, 2001, the unreal- ized gains on marketable securities related primarily to our investment in TCNZ. (See Note 10 for more information on these and other of our investments in unconsolidated businesses.) During 2002, we recognized a pretax net loss of $347 million ($230 million after-tax) primarily relating to our investment in C&W and $232 million ($231 million after-tax) relating to several other invest- ments in marketable securities. We determined that market value declines in these investments during 2002 were considered other than temporary. In 2002, we sold nearly all of our investment in TCNZ for net cash proceeds of $769 million, which resulted in a pretax gain of $383 mil- lion ($229 million after-tax). During 2002, we also recorded a pretax loss of $516 million ($436 million after-tax) to market value due primarily to the other than tem- porary decline in the market value of our investment in MFN. We wrote off our remaining investment and other financial statement exposure related to MFN primarily as a result of its deteriorating financial condition and related defaults. During 2001, we recognized a pretax loss of $4,686 million ($3,607 million after-tax) primarily relating to our investments in C&W, NTL Incorporated (NTL) and MFN. We determined that market value declines in these investments during 2001 were considered other than temporary. (See Note 10.) During 2000, we recognized a pretax gain of $3,088 million ($1,941 million after-tax) related to the restructuring of our equity investment in Cable & Wireless Communications plc (CWC). In exchange for our equity investment in CWC, we received shares of C&W and NTL. In 2000, half of our shares in MFN were restricted and carried at cost. In 2001, those shares became unrestricted and all of our MFN shares were recorded at fair value. (See Note 10.) Certain other investments in securities that we hold are not adjusted to market values because those values are not readily determinable and/or the securities are not marketable. We have, however, adjusted the carrying values of these securities in situations where we believe declines in value below cost were other than temporary. During 2002 and 2001, we recognized pretax losses of $2,898 million ($2,735 mil- lion after-tax) and $1,251 million ($1,251 million after-tax), respectively, primarily in Income (Loss) From Unconsolidated Businesses in the consolidated statements of income relating to our investment in Genuity. The 2002 loss includes a write-down of our investments and loans of $2,624 million ($2,560 million after-tax). We also recorded a pretax charge of $274 million ($175 million after-tax) related to the remaining financial exposure to our assets, including receivables, as a result of Genuity’s bankruptcy (see Note 10). The carrying values for investments not adjusted to market value were $103 million at December 31, 2002 and $1,558 million at December 31, 2001. At December 31, 2002, the decrease in marketable securities from December 31, 2001 is primarily due to the other than temporary declines in the market value of Cable & Wireless plc (C&W) and its subsequent sale, the sale of nearly all of our interest in Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Limited (TCNZ) and the other than tem- porary declines in the market value of Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc. (MFN). Our remaining investments in marketable securities are As a result of capital gains and other income on access line sales and investment sales in 2002, as well as assessments and transactions related to several of the impaired investments during the third and fourth quarters of 2002, we recorded tax benefits of $2,104 million in 2002 pertaining to current and prior year investment impairments. The investment impairments primarily related to debt and equity investments in MFN and in Genuity. 48 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED NOTE 9 PLANT, PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT The following table displays the details of plant, property and equip- ment, which is stated at cost: At December 31, Land Buildings and equipment Network equipment Furniture, office and data processing equipment Work in progress Leasehold improvements Other Accumulated depreciation Total NOTE 10 (dollars in millions) 2001 2002 $ 915 14,572 137,353 18,586 1,476 1,573 3,553 178,028 (103,532) $ 74,496 $ 850 13,285 132,035 15,568 1,970 1,516 4,362 169,586 (95,167) $ 74,419 INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED BUSINESSES Our investments in unconsolidated businesses are comprised of the following: (dollars in millions) 2001 Ownership Investment Ownership Investment 2002 During 2002, we recorded a pretax loss of $1,400 million ($1,400 mil- lion after-tax) due to the other than temporary decline in the market value of our investment in CANTV. As a result of the political and eco- nomic instability in Venezuela, including the devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar, and the related impact on CANTV’s future eco- nomic prospects, we no future undiscounted cash flows applicable to CANTV were sufficient to recover our investment. Accordingly, we wrote our investment down to market value as of March 31, 2002. The goodwill included in our investment in CANTV was zero at December 31, 2002. longer expected that the Omnitel Vodafone Omnitel N.V. (Omnitel) operates a cellular mobile tele- phone network in Italy. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, our investment in Omnitel included goodwill of $830 million and $703 million, respectively. TELUS TELUS Corporation (TELUS) is a full-service telecommunications provider operating in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Alberta and Québec. TELUS also provides wireless, data and Internet protocol services in central and eastern Canada. At December 31, 2001, our investment in TELUS included goodwill of $55 million. In 2002, we recorded a pretax loss of $580 million ($430 million after- tax) to the market value of our investment in TELUS. We determined that market value decline in this investment was considered other than temporary. At December 31, 2002, goodwill included in our investment in TELUS was zero. 28.5% $ 23.1 21.3 52.0 Various 475 2,226 463 – 1,622 4,786 28.5% $ 1,869 1,574 23.1 1,363 23.7 446 40.0 1,560 Various 6,812 TELPRI Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc. (TELPRI) provides local, wireless, long-distance, paging, and Internet-access services in Puerto Rico. At December 31, 2001, our investment in TELPRI included goodwill of $206 million. – – 0.2 – Various – – 8 – 194 202 $ 4,988 8.2 4.6 21.5 6.6 Various 1,264 634 840 230 422 3,390 $10,202 Dividends received from investees amounted to $182 million in 2002, $244 million in 2001 and $215 million in 2000. Equity Investees CANTV Compañia Anónima Nacional Teléfonos de Venezuela (CANTV) is the primary provider of local telephone service and national and interna- tional long-distance service in Venezuela. CANTV also provides wireless, Internet-access and directory advertising services. At December 31, 2001, our investment in CANTV included goodwill of $673 million. In October 2001, shareholders of CANTV approved an extraordinary dividend of approximately $550 million, paid in two installments in December 2001 and March 2002, and a share repurchase program of up to 15% of CANTV's shares. During December 2001, we received approximately $167 million from the repurchase program and $85 million in dividends. In 2002, we received $67 million in dividends. On January 25, 2002, Verizon exercised its option to purchase an additional 12% of TELPRI common stock, from PRTA Holdings Corporation, an entity of the government of Puerto Rico. Verizon obtained the option as part of the March 1999 TELPRI privatization. We now hold 52% of TELPRI stock, up from 40%. As a result, Verizon changed the accounting for its investment in TELPRI from the equity method to full consolidation, effective January 1, 2002. Other Equity Investees Verizon has limited partnership investments in variable interest enti- ties that invest in affordable housing projects, for which Verizon provides funding as a limited partner and receives tax deductions and tax credits based on its partnership interests. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, Verizon had equity investments in these partnerships of $954 million and $825 million, respectively. Verizon currently adjusts the carrying value of these investments for any losses incurred by the limited partnerships through earnings. We also have international wireless investments in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. These investments are in joint ventures to build and operate cellular networks in these countries. We also have an investment in a company in the Philippines which provides telecommunications services in some regions of that country. The remaining investments include wireless partnerships in the U.S., real estate partnerships, publishing joint ventures, and several other domestic and international joint ventures. 49 At December 31, Equity Investees CANTV Omnitel TELUS TELPRI Other Total equity investees Cost Investees Genuity C&W TCNZ MFN Other Total cost investees Total NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED Cost Investees Some of our cost investments are carried at their current market value, principally our investment in TCNZ. Other cost investments are carried at their original cost, except in cases where we have deter- mined that a decline in the estimated market value of an investment is other than temporary as described in Note 8. Genuity Prior to the merger of Bell Atlantic and GTE, we owned and consoli- dated Genuity (a tier-one interLATA Internet backbone and related data business). In June 2000, as a condition of the merger, 90.5% of the voting equity of Genuity was issued in an initial public offering. As a result of the initial public offering and our loss of control, we decon- solidated Genuity. Genuity’s revenues for the first six months of 2000, the period prior to deconsolidation, were $529 million and its net loss was $281 million. Our remaining ownership interest in Genuity con- tained a contingent conversion feature that gave us the option (if prescribed conditions were met), among other things, to regain con- trol of Genuity. Our ability to legally exercise this conversion feature was dependent on obtaining approvals to provide long distance serv- ice in the former Bell Atlantic region and satisfaction of other regulatory and legal requirements. On July 24, 2002, we converted all but one of our shares of Class B common stock of Genuity into shares of Class A common stock of Genuity. As a result, we have relinquished the right to convert our current ownership into a controlling interest as described above. On December 18, 2002, we sold all of our Class A common stock of Genuity. We now own a voting and economic interest in Genuity of less than one-hundredth of 1%. See Note 24 for additional informa- tion on our ongoing business relationship and future commitments to Genuity. During 2002, we determined that recoverability of our investment in Genuity was not reasonably assured due to Genuity’s continuing operating losses and a significant decrease in the market price of the Class A common stock of Genuity. As a result, we recorded a pretax charge of $2,624 million ($2,560 million after-tax) to reduce the carrying value of our interest in Genuity to its estimated fair value (see Note 8). During 2001, we recorded a pretax charge of $1,251 million ($1,251 million after-tax) related to our cost investment in Genuity. The charge was necessary because we determined that the decline in the esti- mated fair value of Genuity was other than temporary. Our investment in Genuity was not considered a marketable security given its unique characteristics and the associated contingent conversion right. However, we estimated fair value based on the number of shares of Genuity we would own, assuming the exercise of the contingent con- version right, and the market value of Genuity common stock. C&W/NTL Prior to 2000, we transferred our interests in cable television and telecommunications operations in the United Kingdom to CWC in exchange for an 18.5% ownership interest in CWC, an international telecommunications service provider. In May 2000, C&W, NTL and CWC completed a restructuring of CWC. Under the terms of the restructuring, CWC’s consumer cable telephone, television and Internet operations were separated from its corporate, business, Internet protocol and wholesale operations. Once separated, the consumer operations were acquired by NTL and the other operations 50 were acquired by C&W. In connection with the restructuring, we, as a shareholder in CWC, received shares in the two acquiring companies, representing approximately 9.1% of the NTL shares outstanding at the time and approximately 4.6% of the C&W shares outstanding at the time. Based on this level of ownership, our investments in NTL and C&W have been accounted for under the cost method. See Note 8 for information regarding a gain on the restructuring of CWC and declines in market value of our C&W and NTL investments consid- ered other than temporary. During 2002, we sold all of our investment in C&W (see Note 8 for additional information) and NTL. TCNZ TCNZ is the principal provider of telecommunications services in New Zealand. During 2002, we sold nearly all of our investment in TCNZ (see Note 8 for additional information). Agreement with MFN On March 6, 2000, we invested approximately $1.7 billion in MFN, a domestic and international provider of dedicated fiber optic networks in major metropolitan markets. This investment included $715 million to acquire what was at that time approximately 9.5% of the equity of MFN through the purchase of newly issued shares at $14 per share (after two-for-one stock split). We also purchased approximately $975 million in subordinated debt securities convertible at our option, upon receipt of necessary government approvals, into MFN common stock at a conversion price of $17 per share (after two-for-one stock split) or an additional 9.6% of the equity of MFN (based on shares outstanding at that time). This investment completed a portion of our previously announced agreement, as amended, with MFN, which included the acquisition of approximately $350 million of long-term capacity on MFN’s fiber optic networks, beginning in 1999 through 2002. Of the $350 million, $105 million was paid in October 2000 and $95 million was paid in 2001. In 2001, we renegotiated several signif- icant terms of our MFN investment and commitments, in connection with a new financing arrangement. Pursuant to that financing arrangement, we purchased $50 million of senior secured convertible notes that are convertible into MFN common stock at a conversion price of $.53 per share. This new financing arrangement also repriced $500 million of the subordinated convertible notes purchased in 2000 at a conversion price of $3 per share (from $17 per share). Furthermore, the remaining obligations under the long-term capacity agreement of $115 million were to be satisfied through purchases in the amount of $90 million in 2002, $10 million in 2003 and 2004, and $5 million in 2005. During 2002, we wrote off our remaining investment and other finan- cial statement exposure related to MFN primarily as a result of its deteriorating financial condition and related defaults. See Note 8 for information regarding declines in market value of our MFN invest- ment considered other than temporary. In April 2002, we delivered a notice of termination to MFN with respect to the long-term capacity agreement. In addition, subsequent to MFN’s filing for bankruptcy, in September 2002, we sold all of our subordinated convertible notes and equity interest in MFN. In November 2002, we received funds from MFN in partial satisfaction of the $50 million senior secured convertible notes and released our related security interest. The prin- cipal amount of the senior secured convertible notes remaining outstanding is approximately $11 million. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED Other Cost Investees Other cost investments include a variety of domestic and interna- tional investments primarily involved in providing telecommunication services. NOTE 11 MINORITY INTEREST Minority interests in equity of subsidiaries were as follows: At December 31, Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries*: Wireless joint venture (see Note 6) Cellular partnerships and other Iusacell (39.4% and 39.4%) TELPRI (52% and 40%) CTI Holdings, S.A. (47.8% and 65.3%) Preferred securities issued by subsidiaries (dollars in millions) 2001 2002 $ 22,018 1,544 84 276 – 219 $ 24,141 $ 21,243 329 234 – 124 219 $ 22,149 *Indicated ownership percentages are Verizon’s consolidated interests. Cellular Partnerships and Other The increase in cellular partnerships in 2002 is primarily related to the Price transaction (see Note 6). Iusacell Iusacell is a wireless telecommunications company in Mexico. Since we appoint a majority of the members of its Board of Directors, we consolidate Iusacell. In November 2001, Iusacell completed a $100 million rights offering to holders of outstanding stock. We purchased a prorata interest for $37 million, Vodafone purchased a prorata interest for $35 million and the public purchased $19 million. Verizon purchased the additional shares the public elected not to purchase for $9 million. As a result of this transaction, our ownership percentage in Iusacell increased to 39.4% in 2001. TELPRI TELPRI provides local, wireless, long-distance, paging and Internet- access services in Puerto Rico. During 2002, we exercised our option to purchase additional equity in TELPRI, which increased our owner- ship percentage to 52%. As a result, Verizon changed the accounting for its investment in Puerto Rico from the equity method to full con- solidation, effective January 1, 2002. See Note 10 for additional information on the ownership change. CTI In 2001, we recorded a pretax charge of $637 million ($637 million after-tax) related to our investment in CTI Holdings, S.A. (CTI), our cellular subsidiary in Argentina. Given the status of the Argentinean economy, the devaluation of the Argentinean peso as well as future economic prospects, including a worsening of the recession, we recorded this estimated loss based on CTI’s financial position and revised expected results of operations. This loss was an estimation since the Argentinean economy deteriorated very rapidly at year-end and was continuing to reflect instability. We noted this estimated loss might not be sufficient when our assessment of the economic impact on CTI, as well as the structure and nature of our continuing involve- ment in CTI, was completed. During the 2002, we recorded a pretax loss of $230 million ($190 mil- lion after-tax) to fair value due to the other than temporary decline in the fair value of our remaining investment in CTI. As a result of the 2002 charge and the charge recorded in 2001, our financial exposure related to our equity investment in CTI has been eliminated. On March 28, 2002, Verizon transferred 5.5 million of its shares in CTI to an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of Verizon and subsequently transferred ownership of that subsidiary to a newly created trust for CTI employees. This decreased Verizon’s ownership percentage in CTI from 65% to 48%. We also reduced our representation on CTI’s Board of Directors from five of nine members to four of nine (subse- quently reduced to one of five members). As a result of these actions that surrender control of CTI, we changed our method of accounting for this investment from consolidation to the equity method. On June 3, 2002, as a result of an option exercised by Telfone (BVI) Limited (Telfone), a CTI shareholder, Verizon acquired approximately 5.3 mil- lion additional CTI shares. Also on June 3, 2002, we transferred ownership of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Verizon that held 5.4 mil- lion CTI shares to a second independent trust leaving us with an approximately 48% non-controlling interest in CTI. Since we have no remaining investment in CTI or other future commitments or plans to fund CTI’s operations, in accordance with the accounting rules for equity method investments, we are no longer recording operating income or losses related to CTI’s operations. 51 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED NOTE 12 LEASING ARRANGEMENTS As Lessor We are the lessor in leveraged and direct financing lease agreements under which commercial aircraft and power generating facilities, which comprise the majority of the portfolio, along with industrial equipment, real estate property, telecommunications and other equipment are leased for remaining terms of less than 1 year to 45 years as of December 31, 2002. Minimum lease payments receiv- able represent unpaid rentals, less principal and interest on third-party nonrecourse debt relating to leveraged lease transac- tions. Since we have no general liability for this debt, which holds a senior security interest in the leased equipment and rentals, the related principal and interest have been offset against the minimum lease payments receivable in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. All recourse debt is reflected in our consoli- dated balance sheets. See Note 4 for a discussion of an aircraft lease impairment charge. Finance lease receivables, which are included in Prepaid Expenses and Other and Other Assets in our consolidated balance sheets are com- prised of the following: At December 31, Minimum lease payments receivable Estimated residual value Unearned income Allowance for doubtful accounts Finance lease receivables, net Current Noncurrent Leveraged Leases $ 3,881 2,556 (2,426) $ 4,011 Direct Finance Leases $ $ 260 35 (41) 254 2002 Total $ 4,141 2,591 (2,467) 4,265 (214) $ 4,051 $ 49 $ 4,002 Leveraged Leases $ 3,645 2,499 (2,355) $ 3,789 Direct Finance Leases $ $ 321 42 (47) 316 (dollars in millions) 2001 Total $ 3,966 2,541 (2,402) 4,105 (53) $ 4,052 $ 71 $ 3,981 Accumulated deferred taxes arising from leveraged leases, which are included in Deferred Income Taxes, amounted to $3,282 million at December 31, 2002 and $3,079 million at December 31, 2001. As Lessor The following table is a summary of the components of income from leveraged leases: Years Ended December 31, Pretax lease income Income tax expense/(benefit) Investment tax credits 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 $ 110 $ 17 3 64 $ (32) 3 135 46 3 The future minimum lease payments to be received from noncance- lable leases, net of nonrecourse loan payments related to leveraged and direct financing leases in excess of debt service requirements, for the periods shown at December 31, 2002, are as follows: Years 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Thereafter Total Capital Leases (dollars in millions) Operating Leases $ 185 142 161 108 120 3,425 $ 4,141 $ $ 35 30 25 22 16 49 177 52 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED As Lessee We lease certain facilities and equipment for use in our operations under both capital and operating leases. Total rent expense under operating leases amounted to $1,304 million in 2002, $1,282 million in 2001 and $1,052 million in 2000. Capital lease amounts included in plant, property and equipment are as follows: At December 31, Capital leases Accumulated amortization Total 2002 544 (368) 176 $ $ (dollars in millions) 2001 $ $ 482 (263) 219 The aggregate minimum rental commitments under noncancelable leases for the periods shown at December 31, 2002, are as follows: Years Capital Leases (dollars in millions) Operating Leases 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Thereafter Total minimum rental commitments Less interest and executory costs Present value of minimum lease payments Less current installments Long-term obligation at December 31, 2002 $ $ 75 89 31 24 19 93 331 (90) 241 (54) 187 $ 825 739 643 698 353 1,047 $ 4,305 As of December 31, 2002, the total minimum sublease rentals to be received in the future under noncancelable operating and capital sub- leases were $38 million and $4 million, respectively. NOTE 13 DEBT Debt Maturing Within One Year Debt maturing within one year is as follows: At December 31, Notes payable Commercial paper Bank loans Short-term notes Long-term debt maturing within one year Total debt maturing within one year Weighted-average interest rates for (dollars in millions) 2001 2002 $ 2,057 40 4 7,187 $ 9,288 $ 12,781 39 12 5,837 $ 18,669 notes payable outstanding at year-end 1.4% 2.1% Capital expenditures (primarily construction of telephone plant) are partially financed, pending long-term financing, through bank loans and the issuance of commercial paper payable within 12 months. At December 31, 2002, we had approximately $7.9 billion of unused bank lines of credit. Certain of these lines of credit contain require- ments for the payment of commitment fees. Assets of Iusacell, totaling approximately $1,073 million at December 31, 2002, are subject to lien under credit facilities with certain bank lenders, equipment suppliers and other financial institutions. 53 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED Long-Term Debt Outstanding long-term debt obligations are as follows: At December 31, Notes payable Interest Rates % Maturities 2002 (dollars in millions) 2001 1.5 – 14.98 2003 – 2032 $ 17,789 $ 18,377 Telephone subsidiaries – debentures and first/refunding mortgage bonds 2.00 – 7.00 7.15 – 7.75 7.85 – 9.67 2003 – 2042 2006 – 2033 2010 – 2031 Other subsidiaries – debentures and other 6.36 – 14.50 2003 – 2028 13,492 3,315 2,288 4,895 11,408 3,590 2,383 5,062 Zero-coupon convertible notes, net of unamortized discount of $2,293 and $2,386 3.0% yield 2021 3,149 3,056 Employee stock ownership plan loans: GTE guaranteed obligations NYNEX debentures 9.73 9.55 2005 2010 Capital lease obligations (average rate 8.2% and 9.4%) and other lease-related debt (average rate 4.8% and 4.8%) Exchangeable notes, net of unamortized discount of $90 and $146 4.25 – 5.75 2003 – 2005 Property sale holdbacks held in escrow, vendor financing and other 1.75 – 6.00 2003 – 2005 Unamortized discount, net of premium Total long-term debt, including current maturities Less: debt maturing within one year Total long-term debt 222 203 1,269 5,204 241 311 230 1,392 5,744 39 (89) 51,978 (7,187) $ 44,791 (98) 51,494 (5,837) $ 45,657 Telephone Subsidiaries’ Debt The telephone subsidiaries’ debentures outstanding at December 31, 2002 include $273 million that are callable. The call prices range from 100% to 103.6% of face value, depending upon the remaining term to maturity of the issue. Our refunding mortgage bond issuance of $100 million is also callable as of December 31, 2002. Of this total callable amount of $373 million, we expect to call $273 million in the first half of 2003. In addition, our refunding mortgage bond issuance and first mortgage bonds of $393 million are secured by certain tele- phone operations assets. Zero-Coupon Convertible Notes In May 2001, Verizon Global Funding Corp. (Verizon Global Funding) issued approximately $5.4 billion in principal amount at maturity of zero-coupon convertible notes due 2021, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $3 billion. The notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at an initial price of $69.50 per share if the closing price of Verizon common stock on the New York Stock Exchange exceeds specified levels or in other specified circumstances. The conversion price increases by at least 3% a year. The initial conver- sion price represents a 25% premium over the May 8, 2001 closing price of $55.60 per share. There are no scheduled cash interest pay- ments associated with the notes. The zero-coupon convertible notes are callable by Verizon Global Funding on or after May 15, 2006. In addition, the notes are redeemable at the option of the holders on May 15th in each of the years 2004, 2006, 2011 and 2016. Exchangeable Notes In 1998, Verizon Global Funding issued $2,455 million of 5.75% sen- ior exchangeable notes due on April 1, 2003 (the 5.75% Notes). The 5.75% Notes are exchangeable into 437.1 million ordinary shares of TCNZ stock at the option of the holder, beginning on September 1, 1999. The exchange price was established at a 20% premium to the TCNZ share price at the pricing date of the offering. Upon exchange by investors, we retain the option to settle in cash or by delivery of TCNZ shares. During the period from April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002, the 5.75% Notes were callable at our option at 102.3% of the princi- pal amount and, thereafter and prior to maturity at 101.15%. As of December 31, 2002, $8,000 in principal amount of the 5.75% Notes has been delivered for exchange. Also in 1998, Verizon Global Funding issued $3,180 million of 4.25% senior exchangeable notes due on September 15, 2005 (the 4.25% Notes). When issued, the 4.25% Notes were exchangeable into 277.6 million ordinary shares of CWC stock at the option of the holder beginning on July 1, 2002. The exchange price was established at a 28% premium to the CWC share price at the pricing date of the offering. The 4.25% Notes were issued at a discount, and as of December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the 4.25% Notes had a carrying value of $2,749 million and $3,289 million, respectively. In connection with a restructuring of CWC in 2000 described in Notes 8 and 10 and the bankruptcy of NTL in 2002, the 4.25% Notes are now exchangeable into 106 million shares of C&W and a combina- 54 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED tion of shares and warrants in the reorganized NTL entities. The 4.25% Notes are redeemable at our option, beginning September 15, 2002, at escalating prices from 104.2% to 108.0% of the princi- pal amount. If the 4.25% Notes are not called or exchanged prior to maturity, they will be redeemable at 108.0% of the principal amount at that time. During 2002, we recorded the extinguishment of $573 million of the 4.25% Notes. The 5.75% Notes and the 4.25% Notes are indexed to the fair mar- ket value of the exchange property into which they are exchangeable. If the fair market value of the exchange property exceeds the exchange price established at the offering date, a mark- to-market adjustment is recorded, recognizing an increase in the carrying value of the debt obligation and a charge to income. If the fair market value of the exchange property subsequently declines, the debt obligation is reduced (but not to less than the amortized carrying value of the notes). At December 31, 2002 and 2001, the exchange prices of each of the 5.75% Notes and the 4.25% Notes exceeded the fair market value of the exchange property. Consequently, the notes were recorded at their amortized carrying value with no mark-to-market adjustments. The decrease in the debt obligation in 2000 of $664 million was recorded as an increase to income in 2000 ($431 million after-tax). On February 4, 2003, Verizon Global Funding, the issuer of the 4.25% Notes, exercised its right under the indenture to redeem all of the out- standing 4.25% Notes on March 15, 2003. The cash redemption price for the 4.25% Notes is $1,048.29 for each $1,000 principal amount of the notes. A holder of 4.25% Notes that exercises an exchange right will receive a cash settlement of $1,000 for each $1,000 principal amount of the notes. As of December 31, 2002, the principal amount of 4.25% Notes outstanding, before unamortized discount, was $2,839 million. Support Agreements All of Verizon Global Funding’s debt has the benefit of Support Agreements between us and Verizon Global Funding, which guaran- tee payment of interest, premium (if any) and principal outstanding should Verizon Global Funding fail to pay. The holders of Verizon Global Funding debt do not have recourse to the stock or assets of most of our telephone operations; however, they do have recourse to dividends paid to us by any of our consolidated subsidiaries as well as assets not covered by the exclusion. Verizon Global Funding’s long-term debt, including current portion, aggregated $19,360 million at December 31, 2002. The carrying value of the available assets reflected in our consolidated financial statements was approximately $60 billion at December 31, 2002. Maturities of Long-Term Debt Maturities of long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2002 are $7.2 billion in 2003, $5.4 billion in 2004, $5.2 billion in 2005, $4.4 billion in 2006, $3.4 billion in 2007 and $26.4 billion thereafter. These amounts include the redeemable debt at the earliest redemption dates. NOTE 14 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Derivatives – Effective January 1, 2001 We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 133 effective January 1, 2001. The initial impact of adoption of SFAS No. 133 on our consoli- dated financial statements was recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change resulting in a charge of $182 million to current earnings and income of $110 million to other comprehensive income (loss). The recognition of assets and liabilities was immaterial to our financial position. The ongoing effect of SFAS No. 133 on our consol- idated financial statements will be determined each quarter by several factors, including the specific hedging instruments in place and their relationships to hedged items, as well as market conditions at the end of each period. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, we recorded charges to current earnings of $14 million and $182 million, respectively, and gains of $12 million and losses of $43 million to other comprehensive income (loss), respectively. Interest Rate Risk Management We have entered into domestic interest rate swaps, to achieve a tar- geted mix of fixed and variable rate debt, where we principally receive fixed rates and pay variable rates based on LIBOR. These swaps hedge against changes in the fair value of our debt portfolio. We record the interest rate swaps at fair value in our balance sheet as assets and liabilities and adjust debt for the change in its fair value due to changes in interest rates. The ineffective portions of these hedges at January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2001 and 2002 were immaterial to our operating results. Foreign Exchange Risk Management Our foreign exchange risk management includes the use of foreign currency forward contracts and cross currency interest rate swaps with foreign currency forwards. These contracts are typically used to hedge short-term foreign currency transactions and commitments, or to offset foreign exchange gains or losses on the foreign currency obligations and are designated as cash flow hedges. The contracts have maturities ranging from approximately two months to four years. We record these contracts at fair value as assets or liabilities and the related gains or losses are deferred in shareowners’ investment as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). We have recorded gains of $12 million and losses of $43 million in other comprehensive income (loss) at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Other Derivatives Conversion Option In 2001 and 2000, we invested a total of $1,025 million in MFN’s con- vertible debt securities (see Note 10). The conversion options on the MFN debt securities have, as their underlying risk, changes in the MFN stock price. This risk is not clearly and closely related to the change in interest rate risk underlying the debt securities. Under SFAS No. 133 we are required to separate the conversion options, considered embedded derivatives, from the debt securities in order to account for changes in the fair value of the conversion options separately from changes in the fair value of the debt securities. The debt securities will retain their classification as available-for-sale with any temporary changes to fair value being recorded to other compre- hensive income (loss). The fair value of the conversion options are recognized as assets in our balance sheet and we record the mark- 55 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED to-market adjustment in current earnings. The fair value of the debt securities and the conversion options were recorded in Investments in Unconsolidated Businesses in the consolidated balance sheets. A net charge of $186 million related to the conversion options was included as part of the cumulative effect of the accounting change recorded on January 1, 2001. A net charge of $163 million was recorded as a mark-to-market adjustment for the year ended December 31, 2001. As of December 31, 2001, the value of the con- version options in our consolidated balance sheet was approximately $48 million. During 2002, we wrote off the value of the conversion options due to the other than temporary decline in market value of our investment in MFN and recorded the charge of $48 million in Income (Loss) from Unconsolidated Businesses (see Note 10). Warrants On October 10, 2000, we received warrants giving us the right to obtain 3.1 million shares of Interland, Inc. common stock for an exer- cise price of $18 per share in association with an agreement to purchase an ownership interest in a business. SFAS No. 133 requires that these warrants be recorded at fair value in the balance sheet with mark-to-market adjustments recorded in current earnings. A gain of $3 million was recorded as the cumulative effect of an accounting change on January 1, 2001. Mark-to-market adjustments were imma- terial in 2002 and 2001. Call Options We previously entered into several long-term call options on our com- mon stock to hedge our exposure to compensation expense related to stock-based compensation. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 133, we recognized gains and losses in current earnings based on changes in the intrinsic values of the options caused by changes in the underlying stock price. SFAS No. 133 requires that we record the fair value of the options as assets and recognize the mark-to-market adjustments as gains or losses in current earnings. As such, we included income of $3 million as part of the cumulative effect of an accounting change on January 1, 2001. We recorded charges of $15 million and $13 million as mark-to-market adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Japanese Leveraged Leases We previously entered into several long-term foreign currency for- ward contracts to offset foreign exchange gains or losses associated with Japanese yen denominated capitalized lease payments. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, these contracts were designated as effective cash flow hedges; however, late in 2000, we sold a location which held some of the capital leased assets. The assets and corre- sponding capital lease obligations were transferred to the purchaser as part of the sale and, as a result, the forward contracts associated with the sold assets no longer qualified for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. The nonqualifying contracts were recorded at fair value with mark-to-market adjustments recognized in current earn- ings in 2001. These contracts were settled in 2002. We recorded a charge of $4 million as part of the cumulative effect of an accounting change on January 1, 2001. Mark-to-market adjustments were imma- terial in 2002 and 2001. Derivatives – Prior to January 1, 2001 Prior to January 1, 2001, we applied several accounting principles pertaining to our investments in derivatives, which have been super- 56 seded by SFAS No. 133. The table that follows provides additional information about our risk management in accordance with those principles. The notional amounts shown were used to calculate inter- est payments, foreign currencies and stock to be exchanged. These amounts were not actually paid or received, nor were they a measure of our potential gains or losses from market risks. They did not repre- sent our exposure in the event of nonperformance by a counterparty or our future cash requirements. Our financial instruments were grouped based on the nature of the hedging activity. At December 31, 2000 Interest Rate Swap Agreements Pay fixed Pay variable Foreign Currency Contracts Notional Amount Maturities (dollars in millions) Weighted-Average Rate Pay Receive $ 270 $ 901 2001 – 2005 2001 – 2007 Various 7.0% 6.3% Various $ 613 2001 – 2005 Interest Rate Cap/Floor Agreements $ 147 2001 – 2002 Basis Swap Agreements $ 1,001 2003 – 2004 Call Options on Common Stock $ 80 2001 – 2006 Interest Rate Risk Management Interest rate swap agreements, which sometimes incorporated options and interest rate caps and floors, were all used to adjust the interest rate profile of our debt portfolio and allowed us to achieve a targeted mix of fixed and variable rate debt. We entered into domes- tic interest rate swaps, where we principally paid floating rates and received fixed rates, as indicated in the previous table, primarily based on six-month LIBOR. At December 31, 2000, the six-month LIBOR was 6.2%. Foreign Exchange Risk Management Our foreign exchange risk management included the use of foreign currency forward contracts, options and foreign currency swaps. Forward contracts and options called for the sale or purchase, or the option to sell or purchase, certain foreign currencies on a specified future date. These contracts were typically used to hedge short-term foreign currency transactions and commitments, or to offset foreign exchange gains or losses on the foreign currency obligations. The contracts outstanding at December 31, 2000 had maturities ranging from approximately one month to four years. Our net equity position in unconsolidated foreign businesses as reported in our consolidated balance sheets totaled $5,386 million at December 31, 2000. Our most significant investments at December 31, 2000 had operations in Italy, Venezuela and Canada. Our equity income is subject to exchange rate fluctuations when our equity investees have balances denominated in currencies other than the investees’ functional currency. We recognized losses of $2 million in 2000 related to such fluctuations in Income (Loss) from Unconsolidated Businesses. In 2000, our consolidated subsidiaries recognized a net loss of $23 million related to balances denominated in currencies other than their functional currencies. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED We continually monitor the relationship between gains and losses recognized on all of our foreign currency contracts and on the under- lying transactions being hedged to mitigate market risk. NOTE 15 SHAREOWNERS’ INVESTMENT Our certificate of incorporation provides authority for the issuance of up to 250 million shares of Series Preferred Stock, $.10 par value, in one or more series, with such designations, preferences, rights, qual- ifications, limitations and restrictions as the Board of Directors may determine. We are authorized to issue up to 4.25 billion shares of common stock. Common Stock Buyback Program On March 1, 2000, our Board of Directors authorized a new two-year share buyback program through which we may repurchase up to 80 million shares of common stock in the open market. The Board of Directors also rescinded a previous authorization to repurchase up to $1.4 billion in Verizon shares. On January 24, 2002, our Board of Directors approved the extension of the stock repurchase program to the earlier of the date on which the aggregate number of shares pur- chased under the program after March 1, 2000 reaches 80 million shares, or the close of business on February 29, 2004. All other terms of the prior resolutions dated March 1, 2000 remain in full force and effect. Through December 31, 2002, we repurchased 36 million Verizon common shares, principally under this program. Concentrations of Credit Risk Financial instruments that subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of temporary cash investments, short-term and long-term investments, trade receivables, certain notes receivable including lease receivables, preferred stock, and derivative contracts. Our policy is to place our temporary cash investments with major financial institutions. Counterparties to our derivative contracts are also major financial institutions and organized exchanges. The finan- cial institutions have all been accorded high ratings by primary rating agencies. We limit the dollar amount of contracts entered into with any one financial institution and monitor our counterparties’ credit ratings. We generally do not give or receive collateral on swap agree- ments due to our credit rating and those of our counterparties. While we may be exposed to credit losses due to the nonperformance of our counterparties, we consider the risk remote and do not expect the settlement of these transactions to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Fair Values of Financial Instruments The tables that follow provide additional information about our mate- rial financial instruments: Financial Instrument Valuation Method Cash and cash equivalents and Carrying amounts short-term investments Short- and long-term debt (excluding capital leases and exchangeable notes) Market quotes for similar terms and maturities or future cash flows discounted at current rates Exchangeable notes Market quotes Cost investments in unconsolidated businesses and notes receivable Future cash flows discounted at current rates, market quotes for similar instruments or other valuation models At December 31, Short- and long-term debt Exchangeable notes Cost investments in unconsolidated businesses Notes receivable, net 2002 Fair Value (dollars in millions) 2001 Fair Value Carrying Amount Carrying Amount $ 48,634 5,204 $ 51,685 5,239 $ 58,303 5,744 $ 58,613 5,678 202 175 202 175 3,390 1,299 3,390 1,299 The decrease in our cost investments in unconsolidated businesses resulted primarily from declines in the market values of our invest- ments in Genuity, C&W, MFN and the sale of nearly all of our interest in C&W and TCNZ, as previously discussed. The decrease in notes receivable, net resulted primarily from the loss recorded on our investment in Genuity’s notes. 57 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED NOTE 16 EARNINGS PER SHARE The following table is a reconciliation of the numerators and denomi- nators used in computing earnings per share: Certain outstanding options to purchase shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the period, including approx- imately 228 million shares during 2002, 116 million shares during 2001 and 85 million shares during 2000. Years Ended December 31, (dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts) 2002 2000 2001 The diluted earnings per share calculation considers the assumed conversion of an exchangeable equity interest (see Note 6). Net Income Used For Basic Earnings Per Common Share Income before extraordinary items and NOTE 17 cumulative effect of accounting change $ 4,584 $ 590 $ 10,810 STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS Redemption of subsidiary preferred stock Income available to common shareowners before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change Extraordinary items, net of tax Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax Net income available to common shareowners Net Income Used For Diluted Earnings Per Common Share Income before extraordinary items and – – (10) 4,584 (9) 590 (19) 10,800 1,027 (496) (182) (40) $ 4,079 $ 389 $ 11,787 We have stock-based compensation plans, which permit the issuance of stock-based instruments, including fixed stock options, performance-based shares, restricted stock and phantom shares. We recognize no compensation expense for our fixed stock option plans. Compensation expense charged to income for our performance- based share plans was $34 million in 2002, $66 million in 2001 and $101 million in 2000. If we had elected to recognize compensation expense based on the fair value at the date of grant for the fixed and performance-based plan awards consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, net income and earnings per share would have been changed to the pro forma amounts below: cumulative effect of accounting change $ 4,584 $ 590 $ 10,810 – 7 – – (10) – Years Ended December 31, Net income (loss) available to common shareowners Diluted earnings (loss) per share (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 2000 2002 2001 As reported Pro forma $ 4,079 3,612 $ 389 $ 11,787 11,445 (109) As reported Pro forma $ 1.49 1.32 $ .14 $ (.04) 4.31 4.19 We determined the pro forma amounts using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following weighted-average assumptions: Dividend yield Expected volatility Risk-free interest rate Expected lives (in years) 2002 2001 2000 3.2% 2.7% 3.3% 28.5 4.6 6 29.1 4.8 6 27.5 6.2 6 The weighted-average value of options granted during 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $12.11, $15.24 and $13.09, respectively. Redemption of subsidiary preferred stock After-tax minority interest expense related to exchangeable equity interest Income available to common shareowners before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change – after assumed conversion of dilutive securities Extraordinary items, net of tax Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax Net income available to common shareowners after assumed conversion of dilutive securities Basic Earnings Per Common Share Weighted-average shares outstanding – basic Income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change Extraordinary items, net of tax Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax Net income Diluted Earnings Per Common Share Weighted-average shares outstanding Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options Exchangeable equity interest Weighted-average shares – diluted Income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change Extraordinary items, net of tax Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax Net income 58 4,591 (9) 590 (19) 10,800 1,027 (496) (182) (40) $ 4,086 $ 389 $ 11,787 2,729 2,710 2,713 1.67 – (.18) 1.49 $ $ .22 (.01) (.07) .14 $ $ 3.98 .37 (.01) 4.34 2,729 2,710 2,713 6 10 2,745 20 – 2,730 1.67 – (.18) 1.49 $ $ .22 (.01) (.07) .14 $ $ 24 – 2,737 3.95 .37 (.01) 4.31 $ $ $ $ NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED Our stock incentive plans are described below: Fixed Stock Option Plans We have fixed stock option plans for substantially all employees. Options to purchase common stock were granted at a price equal to the market price of the stock at the date of grant. The options gener- ally vest over three years and have a maximum term of ten years. This table summarizes our fixed stock option plans: Stock Options (in thousands) Weighted-Average Exercise Price Outstanding, January 1, 2000 Granted Exercised Canceled/forfeited Outstanding, December 31, 2000 Granted Exercised Canceled/forfeited Outstanding, December 31, 2001 Granted Exercised Canceled/forfeited Outstanding, December 31, 2002 Options exercisable, December 31, 2000 2001 2002 156,164 98,022 (14,663) (6,955) 232,568 34,217 (15,358) (6,219) 245,208 31,206 (7,417) (7,560) 261,437 111,021 131,924 162,620 $ 42.76 48.93 35.57 51.39 45.58 55.93 35.64 47.82 47.60 48.57 28.15 43.62 48.32 40.97 45.29 48.37 The following table summarizes information about fixed stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2002: $ Range of Exercise Prices 20.00 – 29.99 30.00 – 39.99 40.00 – 49.99 50.00 – 59.99 60.00 – 69.99 Total Shares (in thousands) Weighted-Average Remaining Life Stock Options Outstanding Weighted-Average Exercise Price Stock Options Exercisable Weighted-Average Shares Exercise Price (in thousands) 8,534 29,069 109,507 112,359 1,968 261,437 1.71 years 3.79 7.46 7.03 6.77 6.68 $ 26.09 34.84 45.34 56.15 62.15 48.32 8,502 28,823 36,513 86,854 1,928 162,620 $ 26.08 34.82 45.29 56.02 62.49 48.37 Performance-Based Shares Performance-based share programs provided for the granting of awards to certain key employees of the former Bell Atlantic, which are now fully vested. Certain key employees of the former GTE par- ticipated in the Equity Participation Program (EPP). Under EPP, a portion of their cash bonuses were deferred and held in restricted stock units for a minimum of three years. Effective January 1, 2002, all distributions from the EPP will be paid in cash. In 2000, certain key Verizon employees were granted restricted stock units that vest over a three to five year period. The number of shares accrued for the performance-based share pro- grams was 2,861,000, 4,507,000, and 4,387,000 at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Accounting Change – Stock Options In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure.” This state- ment amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a vol- untary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require promi- nent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. This statement permits two additional transition methods (modified prospective and retroactive restatement) for entities that adopt the preferable method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. Effective January 1, 2003 we adopted the fair value recognition pro- visions of SFAS No. 123, using the prospective method, for all new awards granted to employees after January 1, 2003. Under the prospective method, employee compensation expense in the first year will be recognized for new awards granted, modified, or settled. However, in subsequent years, the vesting of awards issued on or after January 1, 2003 may cause an increase in employee compen- sation expense. We estimate the impact in 2003 will be approximately $.01 to $.02 per diluted share. Beginning in 2003, stock option grants to some levels of manage- ment will be reduced, and accompanied by performance-based share awards. 59 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED NOTE 18 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS We maintain noncontributory defined benefit pension plans for sub- stantially all employees. The postretirement health care and life insurance plans for our retirees and their dependents are both con- tributory and noncontributory and include a limit on the company’s share of cost for certain recent and future retirees. We also sponsor defined contribution savings plans to provide opportunities for eligi- ble employees to save for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Pension and other postretirement benefits for the majority of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Modifications in benefits have been bargained from time to time, and we may also periodically amend the benefits in the management plans. At December 31, 2002, shares of our common stock accounted for less than 1% of the assets held in the pension and postretirement benefit trusts. The following tables summarize benefit costs, as well as the benefit obligations, plan assets, funded status and rate assumptions associated with pension and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans. Benefit Cost Years Ended December 31, 2002 2001 Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Amortization of transition asset Amortization of prior service cost Actuarial loss (gain), net Net periodic benefit (income) cost Termination benefits Settlement loss (gain) Curtailment (gain) loss and other, net Subtotal Total (income) cost $ 718 2,488 (4,883) (109) (4) (707) (2,497) 286 237 314 837 $ (1,660) $ 665 2,490 (4,811) (112) (44) (878) (2,690) 813 35 (6) 842 $ (1,848) Pension 2000 $ 612 2,562 (4,686) (127) (66) (623) (2,328) – (911) (250) (1,161) $ (3,489) 2002 $ 126 1,066 (476) 2 (89) 70 699 21 – 441 462 $ 1,161 (dollars in millions) Health Care and Life 2000 2001 $ $ 128 965 (461) – (26) (78) 528 – – – – 528 $ $ 121 909 (441) – (28) (124) 437 – – (43) (43) 394 Assumptions The actuarial assumptions used are based on market interest rates, past experience, and management’s best estimate of future economic con- ditions. Changes in these assumptions may impact future benefit costs and obligations. As of December 31, 2002, Verizon changed key employee benefit plan assumptions in response to current conditions in the securities markets and medical and prescription drug costs trends. The expected rate of return on pension plan assets has been changed from 9.25% in 2002 to 8.50% in 2003 and the expected rate of return on other postretirement benefit plan assets has been changed from 9.10% in 2002 to 8.50% in 2003. The discount rate assumption has been lowered from 7.25% in 2002 to 6.75% in 2003 and the medical cost trend rate assumption has been increased from 10.00% in 2002 to 11.00% in 2003. The weighted-average assumptions used in determining expense and benefit obligations are as follows: Discount rate at end of year Long-term rate of return on plan assets for the year Rate of future increases in compensation at end of year Medical cost trend rate at end of year Ultimate (year 2007) 2002 2001 6.75% 9.25 5.00 7.25% 9.25 5.00 Pension 2000 7.75% 9.25 5.00 2002 6.75% 9.10 4.00 11.00 5.00 Health Care and Life 2000 2001 7.25% 9.10 4.00 10.00 5.00 7.75% 9.10 4.00 5.00 5.00 The medical cost trend rate significantly affects the reported postretirement benefit costs and obligations. A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects: One-Percentage-Point Effect on 2002 total service and interest cost Effect on postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2002 Increase $ 103 1,275 (dollars in millions) Decrease $ (85) (1,060) 60 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED At December 31, Benefit Obligation Beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Plan amendments Actuarial loss, net Benefits paid Termination benefits Acquisitions and divestitures, net Settlements and curtailments Other End of year Fair Value of Plan Assets Beginning of year Actual return on plan assets Company contributions Benefits paid Settlements Acquisitions and divestitures, net End of year Funded Status End of year Unrecognized Actuarial (gain) loss, net Prior service (benefit) cost Transition asset Net amount recognized Amounts recognized on the balance sheet Prepaid pension cost (in Other Assets) Employee benefit obligation Other assets Minority interest Accumulated other comprehensive loss Net amount recognized Changes in benefit obligations were caused by factors including changes in actuarial assumptions (see “Assumptions”), acquisitions, and special termination benefits. In 2002 and 2001, Verizon reduced its workforce using its employee severance plans (see Note 4). Additionally, in 2002, 2001 and 2000, several of the pension plans’ lump sum pension distributions surpassed the settlement threshold equal to the sum of service cost and interest cost requiring settle- ment recognition for all cash settlements for each of those years. In 2002, we recorded an additional minimum pension liability of $1,342 million for the amount of excess unfunded accumulated ben- efit liability over our accrued liability, as required by SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions.” We periodically evaluate each pension plan to determine whether any additional minimum liability is required. As a result of lower interest rates and lower than expected 2002 investment returns, an additional minimum pension liability was required for a small number of plans. The increase in the liability is recorded as a charge to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of a tax benefit, in shareowners’ investment in the consolidated balance sheets. The majority of Verizon’s pension plans are adequately funded. Based on the funded status of the plans at December 31, 2002, there will be no significant pension trust contributions required through 2003; however, we anticipate making required pension trust contributions of approximately $125 million in 2004. 2002 $ 36,391 718 2,488 114 2,560 (3,356) 286 885 (2,256) 78 37,908 48,558 (4,678) 157 (3,356) (2,536) 531 38,676 768 8,295 752 (44) 9,771 $ $ 12,794 (4,540) 72 71 1,374 9,771 $ Pension 2001 $ 33,136 665 2,490 721 1,888 (3,851) 813 70 15 444 36,391 55,225 (3,063) 81 (3,851) – 166 48,558 12,167 (4,547) 817 (160) 8,277 9,738 (1,601) 108 – 32 8,277 $ $ $ (dollars in millions) Health Care and Life 2001 2002 $ 14,310 126 1,066 – 2,253 (1,183) 21 404 434 – 17,431 4,720 (464) 165 (429) – – 3,992 (13,439) 4,412 (892) 23 (9,896) – (9,896) – – – (9,896) $ $ $ $ 12,397 128 965 (601) 2,394 (988) – 15 – – 14,310 5,236 (252) 253 (517) – – 4,720 (9,590) 1,121 (980) – (9,449) – (9,449) – – – (9,449) $ $ $ Savings Plan and Employee Stock Ownership Plans We maintain four leveraged employee stock ownership plans (ESOP); two were established by Bell Atlantic and one each by GTE and NYNEX. Under these plans, we match a certain percentage of eligible employee contributions to the savings plans with shares of our com- mon stock from these ESOPs. At the date of the respective mergers, NYNEX and GTE common stock outstanding was converted to Bell Atlantic shares using an exchange ratio of 0.768 and 1.22 per share of Bell Atlantic common stock to one share of NYNEX and GTE com- mon stock, respectively. Common stock is allocated from all leveraged ESOP trusts based on the proportion of principal and inter- est paid on ESOP debt in a year to the remaining principal and interest due over the term of the debt. At December 31, 2002, the number of unallocated and allocated shares of common stock was 17 million and 64 million, respectively. All leveraged ESOP shares are included in earnings per share computations. 61 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED We recognize leveraged ESOP cost based on the modified shares allocated method for the Bell Atlantic and GTE leveraged ESOP trusts which purchased securities before December 15, 1989 and the shares allocated method for the NYNEX leveraged ESOP trust which purchased securities after December 15, 1989. ESOP cost and trust activity consist of the following: Years Ended December 31, 2002 Compensation Interest incurred Dividends Net leveraged ESOP cost Additional (reduced) ESOP cost Total ESOP cost Dividends received for debt service Total company contributions to leveraged ESOP trusts $ $ $ $ 143 30 (29) 144 120 264 80 280 $ $ $ $ (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 121 61 (36) 146 90 236 87 259 $ $ $ $ 161 69 (43) 187 (19) 168 87 151 In addition to the ESOPs described above, we maintain savings plans for non-management employees and employees of certain subsidiaries. Compensation expense associated with these savings plans was $212 million in 2002, $252 million in 2001 and $219 mil- lion in 2000. Severance Benefits The following table provides an analysis of our ongoing severance lia- bility recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 112: Beginning of Year Charged to Expense Payments (dollars in millions) End of Year Other The following table shows the principal reasons for the difference between the effective income tax rate and the statutory federal income tax rate: Years Ended December 31, 2002 2001 2000 Statutory federal income tax rate State and local income tax, net of federal tax benefits Tax benefits (recognized)/not recognized on investment losses Income (loss) from unconsolidated businesses Other, net Effective income tax rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 7.9 (17.3) (3.2) 3.7 26.1% 11.5 40.2 (11.1) 3.1 78.7% 4.3 .3 (1.2) .9 39.3% The decrease in our effective income tax rate in 2002 was primarily because tax benefits were recognized in 2002 relating to losses resulting from the other than temporary decline in market value of our investments in 2002 and prior years (see Notes 8 and 10). Deferred taxes arise because of differences in the book and tax bases of certain assets and liabilities. Significant components of deferred tax liabilities (assets) are shown in the following table: At December 31, Depreciation Employee benefits Leasing activity Net unrealized losses on marketable securities Wireless joint venture Uncollectible accounts receivable Wireless licenses (see Note 2) Other – net (dollars in millions) 2001 2002 $ 7,314 (427) 3,109 (388) 7,638 (704) 1,613 (425) 17,730 661 $ 18,391 $ 6,171 (533) 3,060 (1,124) 7,287 (255) – (204) 14,402 1,574 $ 15,976 Year 2000 2001 2002 $ 266 319 1,100 $ 122 819 707 $ (11) $ (38) (691) (58) – 21 $ 319 1,100 1,137 Valuation allowance Net deferred tax liability At December 31, 2002, undistributed earnings of our foreign sub- sidiaries amounted to approximately $4.5 billion. Deferred income taxes are not provided on these earnings as it is intended that the earnings are indefinitely invested outside of the U.S. It is not practical to estimate the amount of taxes that might be payable upon the remittance of such earnings. The valuation allowance primarily represents the tax benefits of cer- tain state net operating loss carry forwards and other deferred tax assets which may expire without being utilized. During 2002, the valuation allowance decreased $913 million. This decrease primari- ly relates to the tax benefits recognized on the sale of investments during 2002. The remaining severance liability includes future contractual pay- ments to employees separated as of December 31, 2002. NOTE 19 INCOME TAXES The components of income tax expense from continuing operations are as follows: Years Ended December 31, 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 Current Federal Foreign State and local Deferred Federal Foreign State and local Investment tax credits Other credits Total income tax expense 62 $ (638) 38 496 (104) 1,476 5 256 1,737 (15) – $ 1,618 $ 759 94 258 1,111 898 (16) 232 1,114 (49) – $ 2,176 $ 3,165 105 657 3,927 2,969 (60) 553 3,462 (28) (352) $ 7,009 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED NOTE 20 SEGMENT INFORMATION We have four reportable segments, which we operate and manage as strategic business units and organize by products and services. We measure and evaluate our reportable segments based on segment income. This segment income excludes unallocated corporate expenses and other adjustments arising during each period. The other adjustments include transactions that the chief operating deci- sion makers exclude in assessing business unit performance due primarily to their non-operational and/or non-recurring nature. Although such transactions are excluded from the business segment results, they are included in reported consolidated earnings. Gains and losses that are not individually significant are included in all seg- ment results, since these items are included in the chief operating decision makers’ assessment of unit performance. These are mostly contained in International and Information Services since they actively manage investment portfolios. Our segments and their principal activities consist of the following: Domestic Telecom Domestic wireline communications services, principally representing our telephone operations that provide local telephone services in 29 states and the District of Columbia. These services include voice and data trans- port, enhanced and custom calling features, network access, directory assistance, private lines and public telephones. This segment also pro- vides long distance services, customer premises equipment distribution, data solutions and systems integration, billing and collections, Internet access services and inventory management services. Domestic Wireless Domestic wireless products and services include wireless voice and data services, paging services and equipment sales. International International wireline and wireless communications operations and invest- ments in the Americas, Europe, Asia and the Pacific. Information Services Domestic and international publishing businesses, including print SuperPages® and electronic SuperPages.com® directories, as well as website creation and other electronic commerce services. This segment has operations principally in North America, Europe and Latin America. Reportable Segments The following table provides operating financial information for our four reportable segments: 2002 External revenues Intersegment revenues Total operating revenues Depreciation & amortization Income from unconsolidated businesses Interest income Interest expense Income tax expense Segment income Assets Investments in unconsolidated businesses Capital expenditures 2001 External revenues Intersegment revenues Total operating revenues Depreciation & amortization Income from unconsolidated businesses Interest income Interest expense Income tax expense Segment income Assets Investments in unconsolidated businesses Capital expenditures 2000 External revenues Intersegment revenues Total operating revenues Depreciation & amortization Income from unconsolidated businesses Interest income Interest expense Income tax (expense) benefit Segment income Assets Investments in unconsolidated businesses Capital expenditures Domestic Telecom $ 40,133 579 40,712 9,433 – 50 (1,714) (2,944) 4,387 81,017 70 6,977 $ 41,603 478 42,081 9,248 4 133 (1,787) (3,037) 4,551 82,635 69 11,480 $ 41,576 746 42,322 8,550 35 116 (1,767) (3,124) 4,839 78,112 24 12,119 Domestic Wireless $ 19,211 49 19,260 3,293 14 24 (626) (740) 966 63,470 289 4,354 $ 17,352 41 17,393 3,709 5 12 (577) (413) 537 60,262 285 5,006 $ 14,194 42 14,236 2,894 55 66 (617) (345) 444 56,029 133 4,322 International Information Services (dollars in millions) Total Segments $ $ $ 2,859 103 2,962 532 861 81 (375) (66) 1,047 11,302 3,605 532 2,281 56 2,337 422 919 93 (439) (31) 958 14,324 7,317 704 1,976 – 1,976 355 672 28 (398) 53 733 14,466 8,919 586 $ $ $ 4,287 – 4,287 74 1 11 (35) (794) 1,281 4,319 9 69 4,267 46 4,313 79 – 22 (39) (892) 1,352 4,160 10 93 4,031 113 4,144 74 5 13 (25) (788) 1,238 3,148 28 48 $ 66,490 731 67,221 13,332 876 166 (2,750) (4,544) 7,681 160,108 3,973 11,932 $ 65,503 621 66,124 13,458 928 260 (2,842) (4,373) 7,398 161,381 7,681 17,283 $ 61,777 901 62,678 11,873 767 223 (2,807) (4,204) 7,254 151,755 9,104 17,075 63 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED Corporate, eliminations and other includes unallocated corporate expenses, intersegment eliminations recorded in consolidation, the results of other businesses such as lease financing, and asset impair- ments and expenses that are not allocated in assessing segment performance due to their non-recurring nature. We generally account for intersegment sales of products and services and asset transfers at current market prices. We are not dependent on any single customer. Geographic Areas Our foreign investments are located principally in Europe, the Americas and Asia. Domestic and foreign operating revenues are based on the location of customers. Long-lived assets consist of plant, property and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation) and investments in unconsolidated businesses. The table below presents financial information by major geographic area: Years Ended December 31, 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 Domestic Operating revenues Long-lived assets Foreign Operating revenues Long-lived assets Consolidated Operating revenues Long-lived assets $ 64,356 72,726 $ 64,649 74,462 $ 62,066 71,180 3,269 6,758 2,541 10,159 2,641 11,439 67,625 79,484 67,190 84,621 64,707 82,619 Reconciliation To Consolidated Financial Information A reconciliation of the results for the operating segments to the appli- cable line items in the consolidated financial statements is as follows: Operating Revenues Total reportable segments Genuity and GTE Government Systems (see Note 10) Domestic Telecom access line sales (see Note 3) Merger-related regulatory settlements (see Note 4) Corporate, eliminations and other Consolidated operating revenues – 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 $ 67,221 $ 66,124 $ 62,678 – 623 – (219) – 529 997 1,787 – 69 (69) (218) reported $ 67,625 $ 67,190 $ 64,707 Net Income Segment income - reportable segments Merger-related costs (see Note 7) Transition costs (see Note 7) Sales of assets and investments, $ 7,681 – (288) $ 7,398 – (578) $ 7,254 (749) (316) net (see Notes 3 and 8) 1,895 (226) 1,987 Investment-related gains / (charges) (see Notes 8 and 10) Settlement gains (see Note 4) Mark-to-market adjustment – financial instruments (see Notes 13 and 14) Genuity loss (see Note 10) NorthPoint investment write-off (see Note 4) NorthPoint settlement (see Note 4) Severance, pension and benefit charges (see Note 4) International restructuring (see Note 4) Other special items (see Note 4) Extraordinary items (see Note 5) Cumulative effect of accounting change (see Notes 1, 2, and 14) Tax benefits (see Note 8) Corporate and other Consolidated net income – reported $ (5,652) – (5,495) – 1,941 564 (15) – – (114) (1,264) – (445) (9) (496) 2,104 682 4,079 (179) – – – (1,001) (26) (95) (19) 431 (281) (153) – – (50) (526) 1,027 (182) – 792 389 (40) – 708 $ 11,797 $ Assets Total reportable segments Reconciling items Consolidated assets $ 160,108 7,360 $ 167,468 $ 161,381 9,414 $ 170,795 $ 151,755 12,980 $ 164,735 64 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED NOTE 21 COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Comprehensive income consists of net income and other gains and losses affecting shareowners’ investment that, under generally accepted accounting principles, are excluded from net income. Changes in the components of other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax expense (benefit), are as follows: Years Ended December 31, Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments, net of taxes of $28, $-- and $1 Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Securities Unrealized gains (losses), net of taxes of $(129), $(403) and $(1,077) $ Less: reclassification adjustments for gains (losses) realized in net income, net of taxes of $51, $(1,059) and $51 Add: reclassification of earnings due to accounting change for derivatives Net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities Unrealized Derivative Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges Cumulative effect of accounting change Unrealized gains (losses) Less: reclassification adjustments for gains (losses) realized in net income Net unrealized derivative gains (losses) on cash flow hedges Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment, net of taxes of $(491), $7 and $(13) Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) $ 2002 220 (464) (160) – (304) – 70 58 12 (851) (923) 2001 (dollars in millions) 2000 $ (40) $ (262) (2,402) (3,351) 112 1,061 (2) (68) (25) (45) 13 989 $ (1,877) 88 – (1,965) – – – – (24) (2,251) $ The reclassification adjustments for net losses realized in net income on marketable securities in 2002 and 2001 primarily relate to the other than temporary decline in market value of certain of our investments in marketable securities. The net realized losses for 2002 are partially off- set by realized gains on the sales of TCNZ and C&W. The net unrealized losses on marketable securities in 2000 primarily relate to our investments in C&W, NTL and MFN (see Note 8). The unrealized derivative gains and losses for 2002 and 2001 result from our hedges of for- eign exchange risk (see Note 14). The increase in the minimum pension liability in 2002 was required by accounting rules for certain pension plans based on their funded status (see Note 18). The components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss are as follows: At December 31, Foreign currency translation adjustments Unrealized gains on marketable securities Unrealized derivative losses on cash flow hedges Minimum pension liability adjustment Accumulated other comprehensive loss 2002 (1,228) 23 (33) (872) (2,110) $ $ (dollars in millions) 2001 $ $ (1,448) 327 (45) (21) (1,187) 65 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED NOTE 22 ACCOUNTING FOR THE IMPACT OF THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 TERRORIST ATTACKS The primary financial statement impact of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks pertains to Verizon’s plant, equipment and adminis- trative office space located either in, or adjacent to the World Trade Center complex, and the associated service restoration efforts. During the year ended December 31, 2001, we recorded an estimate of equipment losses and costs incurred associated with service dis- ruption and restoration of $685 million. In addition, we accrued an insurance recovery of $400 million, resulting in a net impact of $285 million ($172 million after-tax) recorded in Operations and Support Expense in the consolidated statements of income, and also reported by our Domestic Telecom segment. The costs and estimated insur- ance recovery were recorded in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-10, “Accounting for the Impact of the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.” In 2002, we recorded an additional insurance recovery of $200 million, primarily offsetting fixed asset losses and expenses incurred in 2002 such that net income in 2002 was not impacted by the losses and expenses incurred. As of December 31, 2002, we received insurance proceeds of $401 million. NOTE 23 ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION The tables that follow provide additional financial information related to our consolidated financial statements: $ 2002 11,927 3,422 (185) 1,565 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 $ 11,155 3,737 (368) 1,454 $ 10,276 3,720 (230) 1,399 (dollars in millions) 2001 2002 $ 4,917 2,796 960 2,171 669 1,232 $ 12,745 $ 1,565 1,072 2,377 $ 5,014 $ 5,171 3,224 1,086 1,985 626 1,855 $ 13,947 $ 1,640 1,061 2,703 $ 5,404 Income Statement Information Years Ended December 31, Depreciation expense Interest expense incurred Capitalized interest Advertising expense Balance Sheet Information At December 31, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities Accounts payable Accrued expenses Accrued vacation pay Accrued salaries and wages Interest payable Accrued taxes Other Current Liabilities Advance billings and customer deposits Dividends payable Other 66 Cash Flow Information Years Ended December 31, Cash Paid Income taxes, net of amounts refunded Interest, net of amounts capitalized Supplemental investing and financing transactions: Assets acquired in business combinations Liabilities assumed in business combinations Debt assumed in business combinations 2002 (dollars in millions) 2000 2001 $ 539 $ 2,935 945 $ 3,201 3,414 3,289 2,702 3,075 6,944 1,200 37 3,667 589 215 4,387 NOTE 24 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Several state and federal regulatory proceedings may require our telephone operations to pay penalties or to refund to customers a portion of the revenues collected in the current and prior periods. There are also various legal actions pending to which we are a party and claims which, if asserted, may lead to other legal actions. We have established reserves for specific liabilities in connection with regulatory and legal actions, including environmental matters, that we currently deem to be probable and estimable. We do not expect that the ultimate resolution of pending regulatory and legal matters in future periods will have a material effect on our financial condition, but it could have a material effect on our results of operations. On January 29, 2001, the bidding phase of the FCC reauction of 1.9 GHz C and F block broadband Personal Communications Services spectrum licenses, which began December 12, 2000, officially ended. Verizon Wireless was the winning bidder for 113 licenses. The total price of these licenses was $8,781 million, $1,822 million of which had been paid. There were no legal challenges to our qualifications to acquire these licenses. We were awarded 33 of the 113 licenses in August 2001 and paid approximately $82 million for them. However, the remaining licenses for which we were the high bidder have been the subject of litigation by the original licensees, whose licenses had been cancelled by the FCC. In March 2002, the FCC ordered a refund of 85% of the payments. In December 2002, pursuant to an FCC order, we dismissed our applications for these licenses, received our remaining payment and were relieved of all of our remaining obliga- tions with respect to the FCC reauction. On January 27, 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the FCC’s cancellation of the licenses violated federal bankruptcy law. In 2001, we agreed to provide up to $2.0 billion in financing to Genuity with maturity in 2005 and have loaned $1,150 million of that commitment to date, which was included in our analysis of financial statement exposure to Genuity (see Note 10). As a result of our deci- sion to convert all but one of our shares of Class B common stock of Genuity into shares of Class A common stock of Genuity and relin- quish our right to convert to a controlling interest in Genuity, we are no longer obligated to fund the remaining commitment under the $2.0 billion agreement. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED Our commercial relationship with Level 3 Communications, Inc. (Level 3), the purchaser of substantially all of Genuity’s domestic assets and the assignee of Genuity’s principal contract with us, con- tinues including a multi-year purchase commitment expiring on December 31, 2005 for services such as dedicated Internet access, managed web hosting, Internet security and some transport services. Under this purchase commitment, Verizon has agreed to pay Level 3 a minimum of approximately $250 million after February 4, 2003. Pursuant to an agreement reached with most bank lenders to Genuity, we agreed to subordinate our $1,150 million loan to Genuity to the loans made by the banks to Genuity. In addition, we purchased participation in the amount of $182 million in the loans made by the banks to Genuity. Depending on the amounts available to pay credi- tors of Genuity, Verizon may or may not recover all of this participation. Consequently, we recorded a charge of $182 million in connection with losses recorded in 2002 related to our investment in Genuity (see Note 8). NOTE 25 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) We also have several commitments primarily to purchase network equipment and software from a variety of suppliers, totaling $798 mil- lion. Of this total amount, $642 million, $140 million, $15 million and $1 million are expected to be purchased in 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. As discussed in Note 4, during the second quarter of 2002, we recorded a pretax charge of $175 million ($114 million after-tax) for a proposed settlement of the NorthPoint litigation. The lawsuit arose from Verizon’s decision to terminate an agreement with NorthPoint to combine the two companies’ DSL businesses. Verizon terminated the merger agreement due to the deterioration in NorthPoint’s business, operations and financial condition. The proposed settlement has been approved by the bankruptcy court and paid by Verizon and the NorthPoint litigation has been dismissed with prejudice. Appeals of the bankruptcy court’s order were dismissed in early 2003. (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) Quarter Ended 2002 March 31(a) June 30(b) September 30(c) December 31(d) 2001 March 31 June 30(e) September 30 December 31(f) Operating Revenues Operating Income $ 16,375 16,835 17,201 17,214 $ 16,266 16,909 17,004 17,011 $ 3,511 2,683 6,017 2,786 $ 3,607 3,801 3,677 447 Income (Loss) Before Extraordinary Item and Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change Per Share- Diluted Per Share- Basic Amount $ 4 (2,118) 4,408 2,290 $ 1,754 (1,021) 1,883 (2,026) $ $ – (.78) 1.61 .84 .65 (.38) .69 (.75) $ $ – (.78) 1.60 .83 .65 (.38) .69 (.75) Net Income (Loss) $ (501) (2,115) 4,405 2,290 $ 1,572 (1,021) 1,875 (2,037) (a) Results of operations for the first quarter of 2002 include a $2,026 million after-tax loss on investments. (b) Results of operations for the second quarter of 2002 include a $3,305 million after-tax loss on investments and a $475 million after-tax charge for severance and related pension set- tlement benefits. (c) Results of operations for the third quarter of 2002 include a $1,550 million after-tax gain on the sale of non-strategic domestic access lines and tax benefits of $983 million related to current and prior year investment losses. (d) Results of operations for the fourth quarter of 2002 include tax benefits of $1,121 million related to current and prior year investment losses, partially offset by an after-tax sever- ance, pension and benefits charge of $604 million. (e) Results of operations for the second quarter of 2001 include a $2,926 million after-tax loss on investments. (f) Results of operations for the fourth quarter of 2001 include a $1,932 million after-tax loss on investments, a $1,001 million after-tax charge for severance benefits, and a $663 million after-tax charge related to international operations, including CTI. Income (loss) before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of accounting change per common share is computed independently for each quarter and the sum of the quarters may not equal the annual amount. 67 BOARD OF DIRECTORS CORPORATE OFFICERS EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP Ivan G. Seidenberg President and Chief Executive Officer Lawrence T. Babbio, Jr. Vice Chairman and President Dennis F. Strigl Executive Vice President and President and Chief Executive Officer - Verizon Wireless Joint Venture Doreen A. Toben Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer William P. Barr Executive Vice President and General Counsel Mary Beth Bardin Executive Vice President - Public Affairs and Communications David H. Benson Executive Vice President - Strategy, Development and Planning John W. Diercksen Senior Vice President - Investor Relations Marianne Drost Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary William F. Heitmann Senior Vice President and Treasurer John F. Killian Senior Vice President and Controller Joleen D. Moden Vice President - Internal Auditing Ezra D. Singer Executive Vice President - Human Resources Thomas A. Bartlett President - Telecom Support Jeannie H. Diefenderfer President - Network Process Assurance - Retail Suzanne A. DuBose President - Verizon Foundation Oscar C. Gomez Vice President - Diversity and Business Compliance Bruce S. Gordon President - Retail Markets Katherine J. Harless President - Information Services Shaygan Kheradpir Chief Information Officer Paul A. Lacouture President - Network Services Richard J. Lynch Chief Technical Officer Verizon Wireless Joint Venture Lowell C. McAdam Chief Operating Officer Verizon Wireless Joint Venture Eduardo R. Menasce President - Enterprise Solutions Eileen Odum President - National Operations Daniel C. Petri President - International Virginia P. Ruesterholz President - Wholesale Markets Thomas J. Tauke Senior Vice President - Public Policy and External Affairs Charles R. Lee Chairman Verizon Communications Inc. James R. Barker Chairman Interlake Steamship Co. and Vice Chairman Mormac Marine Group, Inc. and Moran Towing Corporation Edward H. Budd Retired Chairman Travelers Corporation Richard L. Carrion Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Popular, Inc. and Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Robert F. Daniell Retired Chairman United Technologies Corporation Helene L. Kaplan Of Counsel, law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Sandra O. Moose Senior Vice President and Director of The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. Joseph Neubauer Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ARAMARK Corporation Thomas H. O’Brien Retired Chairman The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Russell E. Palmer Chairman and Chief Executive Officer The Palmer Group Hugh B. Price President and Chief Executive Officer National Urban League Ivan G. Seidenberg President and Chief Executive Officer Verizon Communications Inc. Walter V. Shipley Retired Chairman The Chase Manhattan Corporation John R. Stafford Retired Chairman Wyeth Robert D. Storey Partner, law firm of Thompson Hine LLP 68 INVESTOR INFORMATION Registered Shareowner Services Questions or requests for assistance regarding changes to or transfers of your registered stock ownership should be directed to our transfer agent, EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. at: Investor Services Shareowner Newsline — For recorded earnings highlights, divi- dend announcements and other pertinent information, you may call our newsline at: 800 235-5595 Verizon Communications Shareowner Services c/o EquiServe P.O. Box 43005 Providence, RI 02940–3005 Phone 800 631-2355 Website: www.equiserve.com Email: verizon@equiserve.com Persons outside the U.S. may call: 816 843-4284 Persons using a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call: 800 524-9955 On-line Account Access — Registered shareowners can view account information on-line at: www.verizon.equiserve.com You will need your account number, a password and taxpayer iden- tification number to enroll. For more information, contact Equiserve. Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials — Registered shareown- ers can receive their Annual Report, Proxy Statement and Proxy Card and vote on-line, instead of receiving printed materi- als by mail. Enroll at www.econsent.com/vz Direct Dividend Deposit Service — Verizon offers an electronic funds transfer service to registered shareowners wishing to deposit dividends directly into checking or savings accounts on dividend payment dates. For more information, contact EquiServe. Direct Invest Stock Purchase and Ownership Plan - Verizon offers a direct stock purchase and share ownership plan. The plan allows current and new investors to purchase common stock and to reinvest the dividends toward the purchase of additional shares. To receive a Plan Prospectus and enrollment form, contact EquiServe or visit their website. Corporate Governance Verizon’s Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website — www.verizon.com/investor If you would prefer to receive a printed copy in the mail, please contact the Assistant Corporate Secretary: Verizon Communications Inc. Assistant Corporate Secretary 1095 Avenue of the Americas 38th Floor New York, New York 10036 Equal Opportunity Policy The company maintains a long-standing commitment to equal opportunity and valuing the diversity of its employees, suppliers, and customers. Verizon is fully committed to a workplace free from discrimination and harassment for all persons, without regard to race, color, religion, age, gender, national origin, sexual orientation, marital status, citizenship status, veteran status, disability or other protected classifications. Investor Website — Get company information and news on our website – www.verizon.com/investor VZ Mail — Get the latest investor information delivered directly to your desktop. Subscribe to VZ mail at our investor information website Stock Market Information Shareowners of record at December 31, 2002: 1,121,000 Verizon is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (ticker symbol: VZ) Also listed on the Philadelphia, Boston, Chicago, Pacific, London, Swiss, Amsterdam and Frankfurt exchanges. Common Stock Price and Dividend Information 2002 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter 2001 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter $ $ Market Price High 51.09 46.01 40.20 43.20 57.13 56.99 57.40 55.99 $ $ Low 43.02 36.50 26.01 27.50 43.80 47.00 48.32 46.90 Cash Dividend Declared 0.385 0.385 0.385 0.385 0.385 0.385 0.385 0.385 $ $ Form 10–K To receive a copy of the 2002 Verizon Annual Report on Form 10–K, which is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, contact Investor Relations: Verizon Communications Inc. Investor Relations 1095 Avenue of the Americas 36th Floor New York, New York 10036 Phone 212 395-1525 Fax 212 921-2917 Verizon Communications Inc. 1095 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 212 395-2121 www.verizon.com Printed on recycled paper 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above