Quarterlytics / Communication Services / Telecommunications Services / Verizon

Verizon

vz · NYSE Communication Services
Claim this profile
Ticker vz
Exchange NYSE
Sector Communication Services
Industry Telecommunications Services
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2007 Annual Report · Verizon
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Verizon Communications

2007 Annual Report

Financial Highlights 

(as of December 31, 2007)

Consolidated 
Revenues
(billions)

Operating Cash Flow 
from Continuing 
Operations
(billions)

Declared Dividends 
per Share

Reported Diluted
Earnings per Share

$93.5

$88.2

$69.5

$23.0

$20.4

$26.3

$1.62

$1.62

$1.67

$2.65

$2.12

$1.90

Adjusted Diluted
Earnings per Share
(non-GAAP)

$2.56

$2.54

$2.39

05

06

07

05

06

07

05

06

07

05

06

07

05

06

07

Corporate Highlights 

> 5.8% consolidated revenue growth
> 17.9% operating income growth
> 14.2% increase in operating cash flow from continuing operations
> 6.2% increase in annual dividend
> $2.8 billion in share repurchases

Note: Prior-period amounts have been reclassified to reflect comparable results.

See www.verizon.com/investor for reconciliations to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for the non-GAAP financial measures included in this annual report. Verizon’s 2006 reported results 
include revenues and expenses from the former MCI, Inc., subsequent to the close of the merger in January 2006. Information provided in this annual report on a pro forma (non-GAAP) basis presents the 
combined operating results of Verizon and the former MCI on a comparable basis. Discontinued operations include Verizon’s former directory publishing unit, which was spun-off to shareowners in the 
fourth quarter 2006, and the operations of Verizon Dominicana C. por A. (Verizon Dominicana) and Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico Inc. (TELPRI) following second quarter 2006 agreements to sell the 
businesses. The Verizon Dominicana sale closed in the fourth quarter 2006. The TELPRI sale closed in the first quarter of 2007. Corporate Highlights shown above are presented on a pro forma and  
adjusted basis. Intra- and inter-segment transactions have not been eliminated from the business group revenue totals cited in this document.

In keeping with Verizon’s commitment to protecting the environment, this annual report is printed on recycled paper.

Chairman’s Letter to Shareowners

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  2 0 0 7   a n n ua l   r e p o r t

Ivan Seidenberg  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Verizon has spent the better part of the last decade 
transforming  our  company  to  grow  and  compete 
in the digital era. Our goal is simple: to be the best 
company  in  the  communications  sector,  period. 
To that end, we have gained scale in the broadband, global IP and 

mobile technologies required for us to become a leading network 

company.  We  have  also  come  together  around  a  single  brand, 

common values and a results-driven culture. While there is always 

more  to  do,  we  have  come  through  an  important  phase  in  our 

strategic  transformation. We  now  have  a  superior  set  of  assets  in 

place,  based  on  quality  networks  and  direct  relationships  with 

millions  of  customers,  and  we  have  developed  a  capable  and 

experienced management team. This business model is delivering 

improved operational performance and creating higher returns for 

shareowners.  And  with 

this  solid 

foundation,  Verizon 

is  

well-positioned  to  meet  future  market  demands  for  mobility, 

bandwidth and global connectivity. 

1

In  changing  the  profile  of  our  company,  we  have  drawn  on  the  talents  of  our 

employees, the commitment of our leadership team, and the foresight and resolve of our 

Board of Directors. Now our focus is on using these great assets to deliver the best results 

of  any  company  in  our  industry.  Under  our  chief  operating  officer,  Denny  Strigl,  our 

leadership team is focused on the fundamentals of running a great business: growing 

revenue  and  taking  market  share,  improving  efficiency  and  productivity,  delivering 

excellent service and strengthening our culture. 

Our 2007 results show that this focus on performance and execution is paying off, 

most notably in our revenue profile. Revenues were $93.5 billion in 2007. On a pro forma 

basis – that is, as if Verizon and MCI had merged on January 1, 2006 – this represents an 

increase of 5.8 percent, compared to the 3.3 percent of pro forma growth we saw in 2006. 

This  accelerated  growth  reflects  our  continued  investment  in  the  expanding  wireless, 

Wireless
Revenue
(billions)

$43.9

$38.0

$32.3

global business and broadband markets. 

05

06

07

We believe that having the best networks is key to being the best communications 

company, so we continue to differentiate our businesses through network quality. Our 

reliable wireless network has long been a source of industry-leading customer loyalty, 

and  we  have  extended  this  competitive  edge  into  the  wireless  data  arena  with  our 

nationwide third-generation data network. We are gaining scale and momentum with 

FiOS,  our  high-speed  fiber  network,  which  passed  more  than  9.3  million  homes  at  the 

end of 2007. Verizon also is a leader in providing the global IP network over which the 

digital cargo of the 21st century runs. Our network currently offers secure global access 

to  large  business  and  government  customers  around  the  world,  and  we  are  steadily 

expanding  its  speed  and  reach  in  growing  markets  throughout  Europe  and  the  Asia-

Wireless
Customers
(millions)

65.7

59.1

51.3

Pacific region. Each of our network businesses received top awards for quality in 2007 

05

06

07

2007 Total Return

Verizon

S&P 500

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

-5%

-10%

22.2%

5.5%

12/29/2006

03/29/07

06/29/07

09/29/07

12/29/2007

2

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  2 0 0 7   a n n ua l   r e p o r t

from  sources  as  varied  as  J.D.  Power  and  Associates,  PC  World  and  Wireless  Week.  Our 

reputation for quality is critical in attracting a large and growing base of customers who 

buy  the  Verizon  brand:  we  ended  the  year  with  65.7  million  wireless  subscribers,  8.2 

million broadband customers, close to 1 million FiOS TV subscribers, and large business 

sales to 97 percent of the Fortune 500. 

We achieved this growth by expanding into new markets, innovating, and delivering 

more  value  to  our  customers.  Wireless  revenues  were  $43.9  billion,  up  more  than  15 

percent  in  2007,  driven  by  the  tremendous  65  percent  growth  in  data  revenues  from 

Wireless
Data Revenue
(billions)

$7.4

such services as text and picture messaging, video, music, and broadband access. Data 

$4.5

accounted for about one-fifth of service revenues in 2007, and we believe this is just the 

beginning  of  the  growth  curve  for  wireless  multimedia  services.  Within  Wireline,  we 

$2.2

experienced growth in the consumer space in 2007 as a result of broadband and video 

revenues,  which  few  would  have  predicted  a  few  years  ago.  Clearly,  the  driver  here  is 

05

06

07

the  success  we  are  having  with  FiOS  –  our  super-high-speed  network  that  takes  fiber 

all  the  way  to  customers’  homes  –  which  PC  World  listed  as  #4  on  its  list  of  the  100 

best products of 2007. Customers are responding enthusiastically to the superior speed, 

quality  and  product  line-up  that  FiOS  delivers,  and  we  are  continuing  to  roll  out  new 

services that take advantage of its capabilities. Our global business operations, bolstered 

by our acquisition of MCI in 2006, have delivered five straight quarters of year-over-year 

pro forma revenue growth, driven by 26 percent growth in strategic services – private IP, 

managed services, security, and hosting – that constitute an increasingly large share of 

our base in this market. We are continuing to strengthen our vertical capabilities in this 

market,  as  we  did  earlier  this  year  with  our  acquisition  of  the  managed  security  firm, 

Cybertrust, and we are expanding our ability to serve global customers.

To accelerate our productivity and help us put all our capabilities to work for the cus-

tomer, we implemented a new corporate structure last year to coordinate functions such 

as  marketing,  IT,  network  planning  and  purchasing  across  Verizon.  Working  together, 

these  organizations  are  identifying  opportunities  for  productivity  improvement  and 

implementing the corporate-wide structural solutions that truly take advantage of our 

scale and scope. One example of this disciplined approach to improving business effec-

tiveness is the performance of Verizon Services Operations, launched in the fall of 2005 

and  recently  named  the  best  new  shared  services  organization  of  2007.  This  unit  has 

helped reduce operating costs for such shared services as finance, real estate, and supply 

chain  operations,  which  has  contributed  to  Verizon’s  expanding  operating  income  

Wireless Retail
ARPU

$51.57

$50.11 $50.44

05

06

07

3

margins.  Going  forward,  these  support  organizations  will  be  focused  on  creating  the 

end-to-end efficiencies that will expand margins. More importantly, they are also help-

ing  us  to  think  through  the  customer’s  total  relationship  with  Verizon  and  create  the 

FiOS Internet
Customers
(thousands)

1,541

687

170

05

06

07

integrated experiences that build loyalty and long-term value. 

Our focus on operational excellence is helping us drive the benefits of our growth to 

the  bottom  line.  Reported  earnings  for  the  year  were  $5.5  billion,  or  $1.90  per  share. 

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations were $6.9 billion, or $2.36 per share, up 15.1 

percent  on  a  pro  forma  basis  for  the  year.  Adjusted  operating  income  grew  almost  18 

percent, with margins improving every quarter. Operating cash flows from continuing 

operations grew 14.2 percent, to $26.3 billion, which we have used to strengthen our bal-

ance  sheet,  reinvest  $17.5  billion  in  our  business,  raise  our  quarterly  dividend  by  6.2 

percent and buy back $2.8 billion of stock. (See charts on pages 4-7 for an illustration of 

the Verizon value creation model.) 

Investors  noted  our  solid  execution,  confidence  in  the  future  and  commitment  to 

growing shareowner value. Total return for 2007 was just over 22 percent, compared to 

5.5 percent for the S&P 500. Although we have seen some of those gains erode in early 

2008 as the overall market has dropped on investors’ concerns over a slowing economy 

The Verizon Value Creation Model

2007 Revenue Mix

Wireless 47%

1.

Global Business 23%

Consumer Retail 
(Legacy Verizon) 16%

Telecom Wholesale 9%

Other 5%

We changed our profile by investing in growth.
With  all  of  the  changes  taking  place  in  the  telecom  industry,  we 
developed a strategy to simplify our operations and focus our invest-
ments in growth products. We streamlined our portfolio by divesting 
our directory business and selling some access lines and international 
equity holdings. The capital from these transactions helped to further 
change our corporate profile, through the acquisition of MCI and 
investments in our broadband wireless and fiber networks. 

Collectively, these moves have diversified our revenue base, provided 
new growth opportunities and created shareowner value. Today a 
larger percentage of our revenue stream comes from our growth 
businesses. By focusing on the power of our advanced wireless, fiber 
and global IP networks – along with offering a superior set of prod-
ucts, services and distribution capabilities – we have created a strong 
platform for continued growth. 

4

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  2 0 0 7   a n n ua l   r e p o r t

and the crisis in the subprime mortgage market, we are confident that our strong balance 

sheet, good cash flows and diversified business model will sustain us through whatever 

economic uncertainty we may experience in the coming months. In fact, as a sign of that 

FiOS TV
Customers
(thousands)

943

confidence, the Verizon Board of Directors recently authorized the repurchase of up to 

100 million shares over the next three years. 

Our belief is that good execution and sound financials give you the ability to control 

your  own  destiny,  even  in  uncertain  economic  times.  More  broadly,  we  think  our 

207

3

05

06

07

fundamental strength will serve us well as we prepare for the next phase of growth in 

communications. 

As we look ahead, we are getting a better picture of the opportunities being created 

by  the  accelerating  shift  to  ultra-high-speed  broadband,  wireless  multimedia  and 

anytime-anywhere  applications  and  services.  We  expect  that  a  new  wave  of  wireless 

devices  will  expand  the  market  beyond  phones  and  computers  by  embedding 

communications capabilities into appliances, cars, cameras, credit cards and more. The 

enormous growth of sites like YouTube, Facebook and other social media will continue to 

feed the demand for bandwidth that supports these highly visual and interactive forms 

of  communicating.  All  of  the  defining  experiences  of  the  digital  lifestyle  –  social 

Consolidated Revenues
(billions)

$88.2

$93.5

$69.5

2.

2005

2006

2007

As a result of our investments, we accelerated our revenue growth.
We  believe  that  the  best  way  for  us  to  create  value  for  our 
shareowners  is  to  grow  the  business.  By  strengthening  our  busi-
ness  mix  around  growth  products  and  services,  we  created  a 
stronger revenue stream. Sales of our new growth products have 
also  led  to  increased  revenue  per  customer,  which  has  helped  

offset the losses we experienced in some of our legacy products.  
In 2006, consolidated revenues increased by $18.7 billion to a total of 
$88.2 billion, largely a result of our acquisition of MCI. In 2007, con-
solidated revenues totaled $93.5 billion, an increase of $5.3 billion 
compared to 2006.

5

networking,  media  sharing,  e-commerce,  and  mobile  media  –  depend  on  advanced 

networks and practical applications that deliver their power to customers.

We continue to roll out the industry-leading wireless, wireline and IP technologies 

that give us a global platform for providing this next generation of services. Our fiber-

Verizon Business
Strategic Services
Revenue
(billions)

$5.2

$4.1

optic network has the capacity to deliver the full-fledged multimedia experiences and 

$3.3

radical  interactivity  that  will  create  new  opportunities  in  education,  entertainment, 

medicine,  commerce  and  the  arts.  We  are  already  planning  for  the  fourth  generation 

of wireless network technology, which we will begin testing in 2008. We are upgrading 

our backbone networks to increase the performance and reliability of the vast amount 

05

06

07

of Internet traffic that we carry. Verizon is the founding American investor in an inter-

national consortium that is building a cable across the Pacific Ocean to accommodate 

the  huge  growth  in  voice,  Internet  and  video  traffic  from  Asia  to  the  United  States.  

To make sure our customers have the broadest array of wireless options and to encour-

age  innovation  on  the  part  of  entrepreneurs  and  application  developers,  we  have 

announced an Open Development Initiative that will enable customers to “bring their 

own” devices and applications to run on our networks. 

The Verizon Value Creation Model (continued)

Operating Cash Flow from Continuing Operations
(billions)

$26.3

$20.4

$23.0

3.

2005

2006

2007

Operational improvements have created stronger cash flow.
In  addition  to  creating  top-line  growth,  our  business  model  also 
focuses on creating value for shareowners by generating strong cash 
flow and margins. Our goal is to take advantage of our scale, stream-
line our processes, eliminate duplication and drive savings to the 
bottom-line. 

We continue to increase operational efficiency within each of our 
business  groups  to  improve  productivity  and  margins  across  the 
entire business. The results are evident in our strong operating cash 
flow from continuing operations, which last year grew by 14.2 percent 
compared to 2006. 

6

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  2 0 0 7   a n n ua l   r e p o r t

But for all the technological wizardry of our industry, the real key to being the best 

company  in  communications  is  delivering  the  benefits  of  all  this  technology  to  the 

millions of customers who rely on us for service. 

Think  about  the  range  of  digital  devices,  experiences,  networks  and  services  you 

juggle  over  the  course  of  an  average  day.  Multiply  that  by  those  of  your  family,  your 

friends,  your  co-workers  and  your  on-line  communities  and  you  have  a  digital 

environment whose complexity is increasing exponentially. Giving customers the tools 

Total Debt
(billions)

$38.3

$36.4

$31.2

to  manage  their  digital  lives  –  anytime,  anywhere,  on  any  device  –  will  be  one  of  the 

great business opportunities of the next decade. Few companies are better positioned to 

05

06

07

help customers do that than Verizon. That’s why, going forward, we are focused on using 

our unique combination of assets – networks, software and relationships with millions 

of customers – to deliver the differentiated Verizon experience that will build competitive 

advantage and customer loyalty in the future. 

No one in our industry has cracked the code on customer service for the digital age. 

Verizon can be the company that does that, and we are attacking this mission with the 

same kind of consistency, clarity and accountability that we have exhibited in achieving 

our other performance objectives.

2007 Use of Cash
(billions)

Shareowner
Returns

Investment

Dividends: $4.8

Share Repurchase: $2.8

Capital Expenditures: $17.5

Debt Reduction: $5.2

2007

4.

We used our improved cash flow to provide strong returns to our investors, 
while continuing to invest in future growth.
Our  strong  cash  position  and  balance  sheet  give  us  the  financial 
flexibility  to  continue  investing  for  growth  and  at  the  same  time 
return capital to our shareowners. The confidence that our business 
model can generate top-line and bottom-line performance allowed 
us  to  increase  our  dividend  payment  and  repurchase  $2.8  billion 

of Verizon  stock  last  year.  By  creating  sustainable  growth  in  our 
broadband, wireless and enterprise markets, we are able to reward 
our shareowners today while we continue to invest in the future 
growth of the business.

7

We  are  fortunate  to  have  nearly  235,000  dedicated  employees  who  come  to  work 

every day committed to serving our customers and delivering the products and services 

that will make their lives more manageable, convenient and productive. Our legacy of 

service is built on a strong foundation of rock-solid values and ethical management. Our 

employees’  record  of  excellence  in  such  areas  as  diversity,  energy  conservation  and 

environmental preservation continues to win recognition and enhance our reputation. 

Their actions reflect our deep roots in the communities we serve and our commitment to 

using our size, talent and technology to improve society.

In 2007 we said goodbye to two retiring board members, James Barker and Walter 

Shipley, and Robert Storey will retire in May 2008. Together, they have devoted 78 years 

of service to our shareowners. Every shareowner owes them a debt of thanks for their 

extraordinary  commitment  to  our  company.  We  will  continue  to  reap  the  rewards  of 

their work in the years to come, and you can be assured that our current Board of Directors 

is equally committed to being responsive and accountable to our shareowners.

The hard work of transformation is never finished, nor is the desire to be the best in 

the business ever totally fulfilled. We will always have much more to do. But our 2007 

results  show  what  hands-on  leadership  can  accomplish  when  united  around  a  big, 

ambitious  goal.  There’s  no  room  at  Verizon  for  remote-control  management.  To  us, 

leadership is a personal commitment that requires each of us to be a vital, visible force 

in the lives of our organizations. That passion for performance has made Verizon one of 

a handful of companies that have shown we have what it takes to navigate the changes 

in our industry and come out a winner. I’m excited at the opportunity we have to practice 

that  leadership  every  day,  and  I’m  confident  that  the  Verizon  team  will  continue  to 

produce results for shareowners and customers in the years ahead.

Ivan G. Seidenberg 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

8

 
 
v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  2 0 0 7   a n n ua l   r e p o r t

“To move an industry forward, technology has to 
address the things that people care about, deliver real 
benefits and solve real problems. This is great news  
for those of us in the information and communications 
business, which is so much a part of the daily lives  
of our customers and the communities we operate in. 

If we can use our technology to make their lives  
better, the potential – for us and for our society –  
is unlimited.”

Dennis F. Strigl
President and Chief Operating Officer
Verizon Communications
From a speech given at Fairleigh Dickinson University on Sept. 27, 2007

9

Wireless Broadband for Mobile Connectivity

U.S. Households 
with Mobile Phones
(millions)

Actual

Forecast

U.S. Households 
with Laptops
(millions)

Actual

Forecast

80

60

40

20

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07
Y EA R

08

09

10

11

12

01

02

03

04

05

08

09

10

11

12

07
06
YEAR

 Source: Forrester Research, Inc., Benchmark 2007: 
 The Five-Year Forecast for Devices and Access, Sept. 2007

Source: Forrester Research, Inc., Benchmark 2007: 
The Five-Year Forecast for Devices and Access, Sept. 2007

120

100

80

60

40

10

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  2 0 0 7   a n n ua l   r e p o r t

One of the biggest trends in the communications marketplace is the 
consumer’s increasing appetite for wireless broadband applications 
such  as  downloading  music,  watching  TV,  sharing  photos  and 
connecting to the Internet. Recent advances in mobile technology 
have  transformed  the  wireless  experience  by  moving  traditional 
high-bandwidth Internet applications off the PC and onto handheld 
devices. As a result, consumers are now able to use their wireless 
phones,  laptops,  PDAs  and  smartphones  to  download  videos, 
purchase songs, navigate city streets, watch the news, manage their 
finances and send email from just about anywhere they may be.

Verizon is leading the way in meeting these evolving needs of 
mobile customers. Our nationwide wireless broadband network is 
available to more than 240 million people across the United States, 
enabling a suite of services that deliver entertainment, information 
and productivity benefits to customers.

With Verizon’s V CAST services, for example, customers can listen 
to their favorite music by choosing from more than 2.6 million songs 
available for downloading from Verizon’s online music store. 

We also offer V CAST Mobile TV, which provides customers TV 
broadcasts  of  their  favorite  full-length  comedy,  sports  and  news 
programming  right  to  their  phone.  In  addition,  our VZ  Navigator 
service is a real-time GPS navigation system, featuring up-to-date 
maps and spoken turn-by-turn directions.

For  business  customers,  Verizon’s  BroadbandAccess  service 
provides high-speed wireless access to email, corporate intranets and 
the Internet from notebook computers. We also offer a wide variety 
of  smartphones  that  provide  wireless  access  to  email  and  other 
information stored on home or office computers.

Through our Open Development Initiative, announced late last 
year, we will provide customers the option to use, on the Verizon 
Wireless network, wireless devices and applications not offered by 
the company but available from developers. These devices will be 
certified  that  they  meet  our  technical  standards.  By  opening  our 
wireless network to an even wider array of innovators, we will set 
the stage for the next level of wireless growth. This new option for 
customers will be available by the end of this year. 

11

High Bandwidth for Today’s Digital Lifestyle

U.S. Households 
with Broadband
(millions)

Actual

Forecast

U.S. Households 
with HDTV
(millions)

Actual

Forecast

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07
YE AR

08

09

10

11

12

01

02

03

04

05

08

09

10

11

12

07
06
YEAR

Source: Forrester Research, Inc., Benchmark 2007: 
The Five-Year Forecast for Devices and Access, Sept. 2007

Source: Forrester Research, Inc., Benchmark 2007: 
The Five-Year Forecast for Devices and Access, Sept. 2007

100

80

60

40

20

0

12

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  2 0 0 7   a n n ua l   r e p o r t

Early online applications like email were primarily text-based and 
rode over existing telephone and cable networks. But now a new 
generation  of  broadband,  fueled  by  the  demand  for  interactive 
multimedia and high-definition content, is gaining popularity in the 
marketplace. 

The  number  of  homes  with  high-definition TVs  continues  to 
grow, as does the prevalence of computers in the household. At the 
same time, the content and applications that run on these devices 
require an increasing amount of bandwidth coming into the home. 
Copper wires and coaxial cables simply aren’t the best solution for 
delivering the advanced communications services of the 21st century. 
Only fiber-optic cables have the necessary bandwidth to keep pace 
with consumer demand in the years ahead.

With  Verizon’s  all-fiber  network,  our  customers’  homes  and 
offices are wired for the future. We’re the only major communications 
company  that’s  installing  fiber  directly  to  homes  and  businesses 
on a mass scale across the country. Our fiber-optic network offers 
nearly unlimited bandwidth for voice, Internet and high-definition 
TV services, and is designed to handle new applications as they’re 
developed.

Thanks to the massive bandwidth of fiber, Verizon’s FiOS Internet is 
the fastest service available, with speeds as high as 50 Mbps (megabits 
per  second).  No  other  provider  comes  close.  As  our  customers  

continue to need more “downstream” bandwidth to download music, 
movies  and  other  high-capacity  applications,  we  can  easily  add 
additional bandwidth to meet their needs. In addition, customers 
are demanding faster “upstream” speeds for sending photos, videos 
and other large files to their family and friends. Again, Verizon’s fiber 
network is unmatched. In 2007, Verizon introduced a symmetrical 
FiOS Internet service with upload and download speeds of up to 20 
Mbps, which is ideal for uploading large files to businesses from work-
at-home employees. We are the only company to offer symmetric 
Internet service at these speeds on a mass scale. 

Verizon’s  FiOS TV  service  is  also  provided  over  our  advanced 
fiber-optic network. Because of our direct fiber connection, FiOS TV 
delivers amazingly sharp pictures and sound. And with the virtually 
unlimited bandwidth potential of fiber, Verizon will be able to provide 
more high-definition channels and programs than any other video 
provider. So as the number of HD channels continues to grow, our 
advanced network will be able to meet our customers’ increasing 
appetite for more bandwidth.

Verizon is delivering the broadband future right to our customers’ 
front doors. By connecting our fiber network directly to homes and 
businesses, we are uniquely positioned to enable the bandwidth-
intensive applications and services that will continue to transform the 
world we live in. 

13

 
Global Connectivity for International Growth 

Global Security Services
Spending Forecast
($ in billions)

Global Telecom Spending 
on Business Data Forecast
($ in billions)

$37.9

$32.7

$185.2

$172.4

$158.6

$146.1

$134.4

$123.4

$28.0

$23.8

$20.2

$17.0

06

07

08

09

10

11

06

07

YE AR

09

10

11

08
YEAR

Source: IDC, Worldwide and U.S. Security Services 
2006-2011 Forecast and Analysis, Dec. 2007

Source: IDC Estimates, 2008

14

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  2 0 0 7   a n n ua l   r e p o r t

In  the  pursuit  of  growth,  companies  are  moving  into  new,  high-
potential global markets to offer their products and services. These 
companies also want to maximize their effectiveness and productivity. 
As a result, corporations are faced with the challenge of connecting 
their workforce, their systems and their communications networks in 
countries around the world.

A global company’s network shouldn’t care if employees and 
customers are wired or wireless, if they’re in Paris or Singapore, or if 
they’re working on a laptop or a PDA. They need to be able to gain 
access  whenever  they  want,  wherever  they  are  and  on  whatever 
device they choose. 

Verizon is a leading provider of advanced communications and 
information technology solutions to large business and government 
customers worldwide. Combining our vast global network reach with 
advanced communications, security and other professional service 
capabilities, Verizon  delivers  innovative  and  seamless  products  to 
customers around the globe. We use our world-class network as the 
foundation for offering secure services and end-to-end solutions that 
enable our customers to better serve their customers.

In 2007, Verizon Business moved to further increase its strategic 
services leadership. With the acquisition of Cybertrust, Verizon Business 

became  the  leading  provider  of  managed  information  security 
services  to  business  and  government  customers  worldwide.  By 
combining Cybertrust’s global presence and customer base, focused 
security  expertise  and  professional  services  with Verizon  Business’ 
comprehensive  security  portfolio,  global  IP  network  and  financial 
strength, the acquisition created a powerful and unique player in the 
global security marketplace.

Verizon Business is also a founding partner and landing party 
in a consortium building the Trans Pacific Express (TPE) – the first 
next-generation undersea optical cable system directly linking the 
U.S. mainland and China. The TPE system will use the latest optical 
technology  to  provide  greater  capacity  and  higher  speeds  to  
meet  the  dramatic  increase  in  demand  for  IP  and  video  services. 
The TPE cable system will complement Verizon’s existing submarine 
cables in the Asia-Pacific region, providing further diversity from other 
undersea routes.

Whether it’s providing significant network capability, personal 
service or an extensive set of products and services, Verizon is the 
premier  provider  of  advanced  communications  and  IT  solutions 
worldwide. 

15

Corporate Responsibility: Doing the Work 

At Verizon, we believe that corporate responsibility is more than how 
we conduct our business. It’s the sum of our identity: the quality of our 
people, the value of our brand, our standing in the community and 
our performance in the marketplace. We’re committed to acting with 
integrity, adhering to the highest ethical standards and improving 
the lives of the people we serve. 

But bold statements don’t make a company great – performance 
does. That’s why Verizon was named one of the “100 Best Corporate 
Citizens” by CRO Magazine in 2008. For more information on Verizon’s 
commitment to corporate responsibility, please visit www.verizon.
com/responsibility. 

Education and Literacy
Improving  basic  literacy  skills  in  the  United  States  is  among  the 
Verizon Foundation’s major priorities because of its enormous impact 
on education, health and economic development. Here in the United 
States, more than 30 million American adults have basic or below 
average literacy skills.

Thinkfinity.org is designed to improve education and literacy 
achievement.  This  comprehensive  free  website  delivers  online 
resources to advance student achievement. Thinkfinity delivers top-
quality  K-12  lesson  plans,  student  materials,  interactive  tools  and 
connections to educational web sites. It gives teachers, instructors 
and parents the tools they need to increase student performance. 
More information is available at www.thinkfinity.org. 

Verizon Volunteers
We know that the most effective resources we have for carrying out 
our commitment to communities are our employee volunteers. In 
2007, Verizon employees and retirees donated more than 485,000 
hours of service and, with the Verizon Foundation, contributed $25 
million in combined matching gift funds, making Verizon Volunteers 
one of the largest corporate volunteer incentive programs in the 
United States.

Domestic Violence Prevention
Domestic violence is the greatest cause of injury to women between 
the ages of 15 and 44 in the United States – more than muggings, 
car accidents and rapes combined. Last year the Verizon Foundation 
supported  domestic  violence  prevention  organizations  with  $5.4 
million in grants. In addition, Verizon Wireless’ HopeLine® program, 
which puts wireless technology to work to help victims of domestic 
violence,  collected  more  than  1  million  no-longer-used  phones, 
awarded more than $1.7 million in cash grants to domestic violence 
agencies,  and  distributed  more  than  20,000  phones  –  with  the 
equivalent of 60 million minutes of service – to be used by victims of 
domestic violence.

For more information on the Verizon Foundation’s philanthropic 

efforts, please visit www.verizon.com/foundation. 

16

Selected Financial Data

2007

2006

(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
2003

2004

2005

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  a n d   s u b s i d i a r i e s

Results of Operations
Operating revenues
Operating income
Income before discontinued operations, extraordinary item  
  and cumulative effect of accounting change

  Per common share – basic
  Per common share – diluted

Net income available to common shareowners
     Per common share – basic

  Per common share – diluted

Cash dividends declared per common share

Financial Position
Total assets
Debt maturing within one year
Long-term debt
Employee benefit obligations
Minority interest
Shareowners’ investment

$ 93,469
15,578

$ 88,182
13,373

$ 69,518
12,581

$ 65,751
10,870

$ 61,754
5,312

5,510
1.90
1.90
5,521
1.91
1.90
1.67

5,480
1.88
1.88
6,197
2.13
2.12
1.62

6,027
2.18
2.16
7,397
2.67
2.65
1.62

5,899
2.13
2.11
7,831
2.83
2.79
1.54

2,168
.79
.79
3,077
1.12
1.12
1.54

$ 186,959
2,954
28,203
29,960
32,288
50,581

$ 188,804
7,715
28,646
30,779
28,337
48,535

$ 168,130
6,688
31,569
17,693
26,433
39,680

$ 165,958
3,476
34,970
16,796
24,709
37,560

$ 165,968
5,883
38,609
15,726
24,023
33,466

•	 Significant	events	affecting	our	historical	earnings	trends	in	2005	through	2007	are	described	in	Management’s	Discussion	and	Analysis	of	Results	of	Operations	and	Financial	Condition.
•	 2004	data	includes	sales	of	business,	severance,	pension	and	benefit	charges	and	other	items.
•	 2003	data	includes	severance,	pension	and	benefit	charges	and	other	items.

Stock Performance Graph

Comparison of Five-Year Total Return Among Verizon, S&P 500 Telecom Services Index and S&P 500 Stock Index

Verizon

S&P 500 Telecom Services

S&P 500

s
r
a
l
l

o
D

$200

$180

$160

$140

$120

$100

$80

$60

$40

$20

$0

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

$60.0

  Data Points in Dollars

Verizon
S&P Telecom Services
S&P 500

2002

100.0
100.0
100.0

2003

94.5
107.2
128.7

At December 31,

2004

113.6
128.5
142.7

2005

88.5
121.6
149.6

2006

119.1
166.2
173.3

2007

145.4
185.9
182.8

The graph compares the cumulative total returns of Verizon, the S&P 500 Telecommunications Services Index, and the S&P 500 Stock Index over a five-year period, adjusted for the spin-off of 
our domestic print and Internet yellow pages directories business. It assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2002, with dividends reinvested.

17

 
 
 
 
 
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  a n d   s u b s i d i a r i e s

Overview

Verizon  Communications  Inc.  (Verizon  or  the  Company)  is  one  of  the 
world’s leading providers of communications services. Verizon’s wireline 
business provides communications services, including voice, broadband 
data and video services, network access, nationwide long-distance and 
other communications products and services, and also owns and oper-
ates one of the most expansive end-to-end global Internet Protocol (IP) 
networks.  Verizon’s  domestic  wireless  business,  operating  as  Verizon 
Wireless, provides wireless voice and data products and services across 
the United States using one of the most extensive and reliable wireless 
networks. Stressing diversity and commitment to the communities in 
which we operate, we have a highly diverse workforce of approximately 
235,000 employees.

The sections that follow provide information about the important aspects 
of our operations and investments, both at the consolidated and seg-
ment levels, and include discussions of our results of operations, financial 
position and sources and uses of cash. In addition, we have highlighted 
key trends and uncertainties to the extent practicable. The content and 
organization of the financial and non-financial data presented in these 
sections  are  consistent  with  information  used  by  our  chief  operating 
decision makers for, among other purposes, evaluating performance and 
allocating resources. We also monitor several key economic indicators as 
well as the state of the economy in general, primarily in the United States 
where the majority of our operations are located, in evaluating our oper-
ating results and analyzing and understanding business trends. While 
most key economic indicators, including gross domestic product, impact 
our operations to some degree, we have noted higher correlations to 
housing starts, non-farm employment, personal consumption expendi-
tures and capital spending, as well as more general economic indicators 
such as inflation and unemployment rates.

Our results of operations, financial position and sources and uses of cash 
in the current and future periods reflect Verizon management’s focus on 
the following strategic imperatives:

•	 Revenue  Growth  –  Our  emphasis  is  on  revenue  growth,  devoting 
more resources to higher growth markets such as wireless, including 
wireless  data,  wireline  broadband  connections,  including  Verizon’s 
high-capacity fiber optics to the premises network operated under the 
FiOS service mark, digital subscriber lines (DSL) and other data services, 
as well as expanded strategic services to business markets, rather than 
to  the  traditional  wireline  voice  market.  During  2007,  we  reported 
consolidated  revenue  growth  of  6%  compared  to  2006,  primarily 
driven by 15.3% higher revenue at Domestic Wireless, where we added 
approximately 6.9 million retail net wireless customers, partially offset 
by a decline in reseller customers, resulting in approximately 6.7 mil-
lion total wireless net customer additions. At Wireline, revenue growth 
in  the  residential  market,  driven  by  broadband  and  video  services, 
coupled  with  growth  in  the  business  market  derived  from  strategic 
services, partially offset declines in the traditional voice mass market.
•	 Market  Share  Gains  –  We  are  focused  on  gaining  market  share.  In 
our  wireline  business,  our  goal  is  to  become  the  leading  broadband 
provider  in  every  market  in  which  we  operate.  We  added  1,253,000 
wireline  broadband  connections  during  2007  and  we  achieved  our 
goal  of  being  among  the  top  10  video  providers  in  the  U.S.  during 
2007  through  the  continued  deployment  of  FiOS.  At  Wireline,  as  of 
December  31,  2007,  we  passed  9.3  million  premises  with  our  high-
capacity  fiber  network,  and  we  have  obtained  over  1,000  video 
franchises covering 12.5 million households with TV service available 
for  sale  to  5.9  million  premises.  We  had  943,000  FiOS  TV  customers, 
adding  approximately  736,000  net  new  FiOS  TV  customers  in  2007 

18

and exceeded 1.8 million total video customers, including our satellite 
offering	from	DIRECTV.	Also	during	2007,	revenues	from	our	enterprise	
customers  grew  2.7%  compared  with  last  year,  primarily  driven  by  a 
25.7% increase in revenues from sales of strategic services (Private IP, IP, 
Virtual Private Network or VPN, Web Hosting and Voice over IP or VoIP). 
At Domestic Wireless, we continue to add retail customers, grow rev-
enue and gain market share while maintaining a low churn (customer 
turnover) rate.

•	 Profitability Improvement – Our goal is to increase operating income 
and margins. In 2007, operating income rose 16.5% compared to 2006, 
while income before provision for income taxes, discontinued opera-
tions, extraordinary item and cumulative effect of accounting change 
rose 16.4% over the same period. Our operating income margin rose 
to  16.7%  in  2007,  compared  with  15.2%  in  2006.  Supporting  these 
improvements, our capital spending continues to be directed toward 
growth  markets,  positioning  the  Company  for  sustainable,  long-term 
profitability.  High-speed  wireless  data  (Evolution-Data  Optimized  or 
EV-DO)  services,  deployment  of  fiber  optics  to  the  premises,  as  well 
as  expanded  services  to  enterprise  customers  are  examples  of  these 
growth markets. During 2007, capital expenditures were $17,538 mil-
lion  compared  with  capital  expenditures  of  $17,101  million  in  2006, 
excluding  discontinued  operations. We  expect  2008  capital  expendi-
tures to be lower than 2007 capital expenditures. In addition to capital 
expenditures, Domestic Wireless expects, from time-to-time, to acquire 
additional  wireless  spectrum  through  participation  in  the  Federal 
Communications Commission’s (FCC) wireless spectrum auctions and 
in  the  secondary  market,  as  spectrum  capacity  is  needed  to  support 
expanding data applications and a growing customer base. Domestic 
Wireless  also  expects,  from  time-to-time,  to  acquire  operating  mar-
kets  and  spectrum  in  geographic  areas  where  it  does  not  currently 
operate.

•	 Operational Efficiency – While focusing resources on revenue growth 
and market share gains, we are continually challenging our manage-
ment  team  to  lower  expenses,  particularly  through  technology-
assisted  productivity  improvements,  including  self-service  initiatives. 
The effect of these and other efforts, such as real estate consolidations, 
call  center  routing  improvements,  the  formation  of  a  centralized 
shared services organization, and centralizing information technology 
and marketing efforts, has led to changes to the Company’s cost struc-
ture as well as maintaining and improving operating income margins. 
With our deployment of the FiOS network, we expect to realize savings 
in annual, ongoing operating expenses as a result of efficiencies gained 
from  fiber  network  facilities.  As  the  deployment  of  the  FiOS  network 
gains scale and installation and automation improvements occur, costs 
per home connected are expected to decline. Since the merger with 
MCI, we have gained operational benefits from sales force and product 
and systems integration initiatives. Workforce levels in 2007 decreased 
to 235,000 compared to 238,000 in 2006, primarily from a decrease at 
Wireline due to continued productivity improvements and merger syn-
ergy savings, partially offset by an increase in headcount at Wireless.
•	 Customer  Experience  –  Our  goal  is  to  provide  the  best  customer 
experience  possible  and  to  be  the  leading  company  in  customer 
service in every market we serve. We view superior product offerings 
and customer service experiences as a competitive differentiator and 
a catalyst to growing revenues and gaining market share. During 2007, 
our  Company  received  citations  for  superior  products  and  customer 
service,  and  we  continued  these  initiatives  to  enhance  the  value  of 
our products and services. We are developing and marketing innova-
tive product bundles to include local wireline, long-distance, wireless 
and broadband services for consumer and general business retail cus-
tomers. These efforts will help counter the effects of competition and 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

COnsOlidated  results Of OperatiOns

In this section, we discuss our overall results of operations and highlight 
items that are not included in our business segment results. As a result 
of the spin-off of our domestic print and Internet yellow pages directo-
ries business, which was included in the Information Services segment, 
and	the	sale	of	our	interests	in	Telecomunicaciones	de	Puerto	Rico,	Inc.	
(TELPRI)	 and	Verizon	 Dominicana,	 each	 of	 which	 was	 included	 in	 the	
International  segment,  the  operations  of  our  former  domestic  print 
and  Internet  yellow  pages  directories  business,  Verizon  Dominicana 
and	TELPRI	are	reported	as	discontinued	operations	and	assets	held	for	
sale. Accordingly, we currently have two reportable segments, which we 
operate and manage as strategic business units and organize by products 
and services. Our segments are Wireline and Domestic Wireless. Included 
in our Wireline results of operations are the results of the former MCI busi-
ness subsequent to the close of the merger on January 6, 2006.

This	section	and	the	following	“Segment	Results	of	Operations”	section	
also highlight and describe those items of a non-recurring nature sepa-
rately to ensure consistency of presentation. In the following section, we 
review the performance of our two reportable segments. We exclude the 
effects of certain items that management does not consider in assessing 
segment performance, due primarily to their non-recurring and/or non-
operational nature as discussed below and in the “Other Consolidated 
Results”	 and	“Other	 Items”	 sections.	We	 believe	 that	 this	 presentation	
will assist readers in better understanding our results of operations and 
trends from period to period.

technology  substitution  that  have  resulted  in  access  line  losses,  and 
will enable us to grow revenues. Also at Wireline, we continued to roll 
out  next-generation  global  IP  networks  to  meet  the  ongoing  global 
enterprise market shift to IP-based products and services. Deployment 
of  new  strategic  service  offerings  --  including  expansion  of  our VoIP 
and  international  Ethernet  capabilities,  the  introduction  of  cutting 
edge  video  and  web-based  conferencing  capabilities,  and  enhance-
ments to our virtual private network portfolio -- will allow us to con-
tinue to gain share in the enterprise market. In addition, during 2007 
we acquired a security-services firm that enhanced our managed infor-
mation  security  services  offerings  to  large-business  and  government 
customers  worldwide.  At  Domestic Wireless,  we  continue  to  execute 
on the fundamentals of our network superiority and value proposition 
to  deliver  growth  for  our  business  and  provide  new  and  innovative 
products and services, such as Broadband Access, our EV-DO service. 
We also continue to expand our wireless data, messaging and multi-
media offerings for both consumer and business customers and take 
advantage of the growing demand for wireless data services.

•	 Performance-Based  Culture  –  We  embrace  a  culture  of  corporate-
wide accountability, based on individual and team objectives that are 
performance-based and tied to these imperatives. Key objectives of our 
compensation  programs  are  pay-for-performance  and  the  alignment 
of executives’ and shareowners’ long-term interests. We also employ a 
highly diverse workforce, since respect for diversity is an integral part of 
Verizon’s culture and a critical element of our competitive success. 

We create value for our shareowners by investing the cash flows gen-
erated by the business in opportunities and transactions that support 
these strategic imperatives, thereby increasing customer satisfaction and 
usage of our products and services. In addition, we use our cash flows 
to  repurchase  shares  and  maintain  and  grow  our  dividend  payout  to 
shareowners. Verizon’s total debt decreased by $5,204 million to $31,157 
million	 as	 of	 December	 31,	 2007	 from	 December	 31,	 2006.	 Reflecting	
continued strong cash flows and confidence in Verizon’s business model, 
Verizon’s Board of Directors increased the Company’s quarterly dividend 
6.2%  during  the  third  quarter  of  2007. Verizon’s  ratio  of  debt  to  debt 
combined with shareowners’ equity was 38.1% as of December 31, 2007 
compared with 42.8% as of December 31, 2006. During 2007, we repur-
chased $2,843  million of our common  stock  as  part  of  our  previously 
announced share buyback program. We plan to continue our share buy-
back program in 2008. Verizon’s cash and cash equivalents at December 
31, 2007 of $1,153 million decreased by $2,066 million from $3,219 mil-
lion at December 31, 2006.

As	discussed	in	the	“Recent	Developments”	section	beginning	on	page	33,	
in January 2007, Verizon announced a definitive agreement with FairPoint 
Communications, Inc. (FairPoint) that will result in Verizon establishing a 
separate entity for its local exchange access lines and related business 
assets  in  Maine,  New  Hampshire  and Vermont,  spinning  off  that  new 
entity  to Verizon’s  shareowners,  and  immediately  merging  it  with  and 
into FairPoint. Based upon the number of shares (as adjusted) and closing 
price of FairPoint common stock on the date immediately prior to the 
announcement of the merger, the estimated total value to be received by 
Verizon and its shareowners in exchange for these operations was approx-
imately $2,715 million. The actual total value to be received by Verizon and 
its shareowners will be determined based on the number of shares (as 
adjusted) and price of FairPoint common stock on the date of the closing 
of the merger, and is expected to be less than $2,715 million.

19

Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

  Consolidated Revenues

Years Ended December 31,

2007

2006

% Change

Wireline
  Verizon Telecom
  Verizon Business

Intrasegment eliminations

Domestic Wireless
Corporate & Other
Revenues	of	Hawaii	operations	sold
Consolidated	Revenues

$ 31,926
21,236
(2,846)
50,316
43,882
(729)
–
$ 93,469

$

$

32,938
20,678
(2,888)
50,728
38,043
(589)
–
88,182

(0.8)
15.3
23.8
–
6.0

2006

32,938
20,678
(2,888)
50,728
38,043
(589)
–
88,182

$

$

(dollars in millions)
% Change

2005

$

$

31,694
7,771
(1,849)
37,616
32,301
(579)
180
69,518

34.9
17.8
1.7
(100.0)
26.8

2007 Compared to 2006
Consolidated revenues in 2007 increased by $5,287 million, or 6.0% com-
pared to 2006. This increase was primarily the result of continued strong 
growth at Domestic Wireless.

2006 Compared to 2005
Consolidated revenues in 2006 were higher by $18,664 million, or 26.8% 
compared to 2005 revenues. This increase was primarily the result of sig-
nificantly higher revenues at Wireline and Domestic Wireless.

Wireline’s revenues in 2007 decreased $412 million, or 0.8% compared 
to 2006, primarily driven by lower demand and usage of our basic local 
exchange  and  accompanying  services,  partially  offset  by  continued 
growth from broadband and strategic services. During 2007, we added 
1,253,000 new broadband connections, an increase of 17.9%, including 
854,000 for FiOS, for a total of 8,235,000 lines at December 31, 2007. In 
addition,  we  added  736,000  FiOS TV  customers  in  2007,  for  a  total  of 
943,000	at	December	31,	2007.	Revenues	at	Verizon	Business	increased	
during 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due to higher demand for stra-
tegic products. These increases were offset by a decline in voice revenues 
at Verizon Telecom due to a 3.6 million decline in subscribers resulting 
from  competition  and  technology  substitution,  such  as  wireless  and 
VoIP, including those subscribers who have migrated to our other service 
offerings. 

Domestic Wireless’s revenues in 2007 increased by $5,839 million, or 15.3% 
compared to 2006 due to increases in service revenues, which include 
data revenues, and equipment and other revenue. Equipment and other 
revenue increased principally as a result of increases in the number of 
existing customers upgrading their wireless devices. Total data revenues 
increased by $2,911 million, or 65.0% in 2007 compared to 2006. There 
were approximately 65.7 million total Domestic Wireless customers as 
of December 31, 2007, an increase of 11.3% from December 31, 2006. 
Domestic Wireless’s retail customer base as of December 31, 2007 was 
approximately 63.7 million, a 12.2% increase from 2006, and represented 
approximately 97% of its total customer base. Average total service rev-
enue	per	customer	(ARPU)	increased	by	2.3%	to	$50.96	in	2007	compared	
to 2006, primarily attributable to increases in data revenue per customer 
driven	by	increased	use	of	our	messaging	and	other	data	services.	Retail	
ARPU	increased	by	2.2%	to	$51.57	in	2007	compared	to	2006.	

Wireline’s revenues in 2006 increased by $13,112 million, or 34.9% com-
pared to 2005 primarily due to the acquisition of MCI and, to a lesser 
extent, growth from broadband and long distance services. We added 1.8 
million new broadband connections, for a total of 7.0 million lines in ser-
vice at December 31, 2006, an increase of 35.7% compared to 5.1 million 
lines in service at December 31, 2005. The number of retail service plans 
continued to stimulate growth in long distance services, as the number 
of packages reached 7.9 million at December 31, 2006, representing a 
44.1% increase from December 31, 2005. These increases were partially 
offset by declines in wholesale revenues at Verizon Telecom due to sub-
scriber losses resulting from technology substitution, including wireless 
and VoIP. Wholesale revenues at Verizon Telecom declined by $748 mil-
lion, or 8.2% in 2006 compared to similar periods in 2005 primarily due to 
the exclusion of affiliated access revenues billed to the former MCI mass 
market	entities	in	2006.	Revenues	at	Verizon	Business	increased	primarily	
due to the acquisition of MCI. 

Domestic Wireless’s revenues increased by $5,742 million, or 17.8% com-
pared to 2005 due to increases in service revenues (which include data 
revenues) and equipment and other revenue. Data revenues increased 
by $2,232 million or 99.5% compared to 2005. Domestic Wireless ended 
2006  with  59.1  million  customers,  an  increase  of  15.0%  over  2005. 
Domestic Wireless’s retail customer base as of December 31, 2006 was 
approximately 56.8 million, a 15.9% increase over December 31, 2005, 
and	represented	approximately	96.2%	of	our	total	customer	base.	ARPU	
increased by 0.6% to $49.80 in 2006 compared to 2005, primarily attribut-
able to increases in data revenue per customer driven by increased use 
of	our	messaging	and	other	data	services.	Retail	ARPU	increased	by	0.7%	
to $50.44 for 2006 compared to 2005. 

The $180 million decrease in revenues from Hawaii operations from 2006 
to 2005 resulted from the sale of our wireline and directory businesses in 
Hawaii during 2005. Verizon Hawaii Inc., which operated approximately 
700,000 switched access lines, as well as the services and assets of Verizon 
Long Distance, Verizon Online, Verizon Information Services and Verizon 
Select Services Inc. in Hawaii, were sold to an affiliate of The Carlyle Group 
for  $1,326  million  in  cash  proceeds.  In  connection  with  this  sale,  we 
recorded a net pretax gain of $530 million ($336 million after-tax, or $.12 
per diluted share) during the second quarter of 2005.

20

 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

Consolidated Operating Expenses

Years Ended December 31,

2007

2006

% Change

2006

(dollars in millions)
% Change

2005

Cost of services and sales
Selling, general and administrative 
expense
Depreciation and amortization expense
Sales of businesses, net
Consolidated Operating Expenses

$ 37,547

$

35,309

25,967
14,377
–
$ 77,891

24,955
14,545
–
74,809

$

6.3

4.1
(1.2)
–
4.1

$

35,309

$

24,409

44.7

24,955
14,545
–
74,809

$

19,443
13,615
(530)
56,937

$

28.3
6.8
(100.0)
31.4

2007 Compared to 2006
Cost of Services and Sales
Cost of services and sales includes the following costs directly attribut-
able to a service or product: salaries and wages, benefits, materials and 
supplies, contracted services, network access and transport costs, cus-
tomer provisioning costs, computer systems support, costs to support 
our outsourcing contracts and technical facilities and contributions to 
the universal service fund. Aggregate customer care costs, which include 
billing and service provisioning, are allocated between cost of services 
and sales and selling, general and administrative expense.

Consolidated cost of services and sales in 2007 increased $2,238 million, 
or 6.3% compared to 2006, primarily as a result of higher wireless network 
costs and wireless equipment costs, as well as higher costs associated 
with Wireline’s growth businesses. The increase was partially offset by the 
impact of productivity improvement initiatives and decreases in net pen-
sion and other postretirement benefit costs.

The higher wireless network costs were caused by increased network 
usage  relating  to  both  voice  and  data  services  in  2007  compared  to 
2006, partially offset by decreased local interconnection, long distance 
and roaming rates. Cost of wireless equipment sales increased in 2007 
compared to 2006, primarily as a result of an increase in wireless devices 
sold due to an increase in equipment upgrades. 

Consolidated operating expenses in 2007 and 2006 primarily include $32 
million and $25 million, respectively, of costs associated with the integra-
tion of MCI into our wireline business. 

Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense includes salaries and wages 
and benefits not directly attributable to a service or product, bad debt 
charges,  taxes  other  than  income,  advertising  and  sales  commission 
costs, customer billing, call center and information technology costs, pro-
fessional service fees and rent for administrative space.

Consolidated  selling,  general  and  administrative  expense  in  2007 
increased $1,012 million, or 4.1% compared to 2006. The increase was 
primarily attributable to higher salary and benefits expenses. Also contrib-
uting to the increase was higher sales commission expense at Domestic 
Wireless and higher advertising costs at Wireline. Partially offsetting the 
increases were lower bad debt expenses and cost reduction initiatives.

Consolidated operating expenses in 2007 included $772 million for sever-
ance and related expenses as a result of workforce reductions that began 
in the fourth quarter of 2007 and are expected to occur throughout 2008 
as  well  as  adjustments  to  our  actuarial  assumptions  for  severance  to 
align with future expectations, $146 million for merger integration costs, 
primarily  comprised  of Wireline  systems  integration  activities  related 
to businesses acquired and $84 million related to the spin-off of local 

exchange  and  related  business  assets  in  Maine,  New  Hampshire  and 
Vermont. In addition, during 2007 we contributed $100 million of the 
proceeds	from	the	sale	of	TELPRI	to	the	Verizon	Foundation.	

Consolidated operating expenses in 2006 included $56 million related 
to  pension  settlement  losses  incurred  in  connection  with  our  benefit 
plans and a net pretax charge of $369 million for employee severance 
and severance-related activities in connection with the involuntary sepa-
ration of approximately 4,100 employees who were separated in 2006. 
Consolidated operating expenses in 2006 also included $207 million of 
merger integration costs, primarily for advertising and other costs related 
to re-branding initiatives and systems integration activities, and a net 
pretax charge of $184 million for Verizon Center relocation costs. 

Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $168 million, or 1.2% 
in  2007  compared  to  2006. The  decrease  was  primarily  due  to  lower 
rates of depreciation as a result of changes in the estimated useful lives 
of certain asset classes at Wireline and fully amortized customer lists at 
Domestic Wireless, partially offset by growth in depreciable telephone 
plant as a result of increased capital expenditures.

2006 Compared to 2005
Cost of Services and Sales
Cost of services and sales increased by $10,900 million, or 44.7% in 2006 
compared to 2005. This increase was principally driven by higher costs 
attributable to the inclusion of the former MCI operations in the Wireline 
segment subsequent to the completion of the merger, and to a lesser 
extent higher wireless network costs, increases in wireless equipment 
costs and increases in pension and other postretirement benefit costs, 
partially offset by the net impact of productivity improvement initiatives.

The higher wireless network costs were caused by increased network 
usage relating to both voice and data services in 2006 compared to 2005, 
partially offset by decreased roaming, local interconnection and long dis-
tance rates. Cost of wireless equipment sales increased in 2006 compared 
to 2005 primarily as a result of an increase in wireless devices sold due to 
an increase in gross activations and equipment upgrades as well as an 
increase in cost per unit.

Costs in these periods were also impacted by increased pension and other 
postretirement benefit costs. The overall impact of the 2006 assumptions, 
combined with the impact of lower than expected actual asset returns 
over the past several years, resulted in pension and other postretirement 
benefit expense of approximately $1,377 million in 2006 compared to net 
pension and postretirement benefit expense of $1,231 million in 2005. 
Consolidated operating expenses in 2006 included $25 million of merger 
integration costs related to the acquisition of MCI. 

21

Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense increased by $5,512 million, 
or 28.3% in 2006 compared to 2005. This increase was driven by the inclu-
sion of the former MCI operations in the Wireline segment subsequent 
to the completion of the merger, increases in the Domestic Wireless seg-
ment primarily related to increased salary and benefits expenses, and 
non-operational charges. 

Consolidated operating expenses in 2006 included $56 million related 
to  pension  settlement  losses  incurred  in  connection  with  our  benefit 
plans, a net pretax charge of $369 million for employee severance and 
severance-related activities in connection with the involuntary separation 
of  approximately  4,100  employees  who  were  separated  in  2006. 
Consolidated  operating  expenses  in  2006  also  included  $207  million 
of  merger  integration  costs  primarily  for  advertising  and  other  costs 
related to re-branding initiatives and systems integration activities, and 
a net pretax charge of $184 million for Verizon Center relocation costs. 
Consolidated operating expenses in 2005 included a pretax impairment 
charge of $125 million pertaining to our leasing operations for airplanes 
leased to airlines experiencing financial difficulties, a net pretax charge 
of $98 million related to the restructuring of the Verizon management 
retirement benefit plans and a pretax charge of $59 million associated 
with  employee  severance  costs  and  severance-related  activities  in 
connection with the voluntary separation program for surplus union-
represented employees. 

Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation  and  amortization  expense  increased  by  $930  million,  or 
6.8% in 2006 compared to 2005. This increase was primarily due to higher 
depreciable and amortizable asset bases as a result of the MCI merger 
and, to a lesser extent, increased capital expenditures.

  Other Consolidated Results

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Businesses

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Vodafone Omnitel
CANTV
Other

$

$

597
–
(12)
585

$

$

703
182
(112)
773

$

$

741
53
(108)
686

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated businesses decreased by $188 mil-
lion, or 24.3% in 2007 compared to 2006. The decrease is primarily driven 
by  the  nationalization  of  Compañía  Anónima  Nacional  Teléfonos  de 
Venezuela (CANTV) during 2007, as well as the effect of lower tax benefits 
at Vodafone Omnitel N.V. (Vodafone Omnitel).

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated businesses increased by $87 mil-
lion, or 12.7% in 2006 compared to 2005. The increase is primarily due 
to additional pension liabilities that CANTV recognized in 2005, as well 
as the effect of favorable operating results and lower taxes in 2006. In 
addition, the increase reflects our proportionate share, or $85 million, of 
a tax benefit at Vodafone Omnitel in the third quarter of 2006, partially 
offset by a similar benefit recorded in the third quarter of 2005 of $76 
million. This was offset by lower tax benefits and lower operating results 
at Vodafone Omnitel.

Other Income and (Expense), Net

Years Ended December 31,

Interest income
Foreign exchange gains (losses), net
Other, net
Total

2007

168
14
29
211

$

$

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

$

$

201
(3)
197
395

$

$

 103
11
197
311

Other  Income  and  (Expense),  Net  in  2007  decreased  $184  million,  or 
46.6% compared to 2006. The decline was primarily attributable to a gain 
on the sale of a Wireline investment in the prior year, as well as decreased 
interest income as a result of lower average cash balances.

Other Income and (Expense), Net in 2006 increased $84 million, or 27% 
compared to 2005. The increase was primarily due to increased interest 
income as a result of higher average cash balances coupled with higher 
interest  rates  in  2006  compared  to  2005,  partially  offset  by  foreign 
exchange losses. Other, net in 2005 included a pretax gain on the sale of 
a small international business and investment gains and expenses related 
to the early retirement of debt. 

Interest Expense

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Total interest costs on debt balances
Less: capitalized interest costs
Interest expense

$ 2,258
(429)
$ 1,829

$

$

2,811
(462)
2,349

$

$

2,481
(352)
2,129

Weighted average debt outstanding
Effective interest rate

$ 32,964
6.85%

$ 41,500
6.78%

$ 39,152
6.30%

Total interest costs decreased $553 million in 2007 compared to 2006, pri-
marily due to a decrease in average debt levels, partially offset by slightly 
higher interest rates. Debt levels decreased primarily as a result of the 
approximately $7.1 billion reduction from the spin-off of our domestic 
print and Internet yellow pages directories business in November 2006, 
as well as from debt redemptions and retirements funded by proceeds 
from the spin-off and the divestiture of our Caribbean and Latin American 
investments during 2006 and the first quarter of 2007.

In 2006, interest costs increased $330 million compared to 2005 primarily 
due to an increase in average debt level of $2,348 million and increased 
interest  rates  compared  to  2005.  Higher  capital  expenditures  in  2006 
contributed to higher capitalized interest costs. 

Minority Interest

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Minority interest

$ 5,053

$

 4,038

$

3,001

The increase in minority interest in 2007 compared to 2006, and in 2006 
compared to 2005, was due to the higher earnings at Domestic Wireless, 
which has a significant minority interest attributable to Vodafone Group 
Plc (Vodafone).

Provision for Income Taxes

Years Ended December 31,

2007 

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Provision for income taxes
Effective income tax rate

$ 3,982
42.0%

$

 2,674
 32.8%

$

2,421
28.7%

22

 
  
 
 
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

The effective income tax rate is calculated by dividing the provision for 
income taxes by income from continuing operations before the provi-
sion for income taxes. The effective income tax rate in 2007 compared 
to 2006 was higher primarily due to recording $610 million of foreign 
and  domestic  taxes  and  expenses  specifically  relating  to  our  share  of 
Vodafone Omnitel distributable earnings. Verizon received a net distri-
bution from Vodafone Omnitel in December 2007 of approximately $2.1 
billion and anticipates that it may receive an additional distribution from 
Vodafone  Omnitel  within  the  next  twelve  months. The  2007  rate  was 
also increased due to higher state taxes in 2007 as compared to 2006, 
as well as greater benefits from foreign operations in 2006 compared to 
2007. These increases were partially offset by lower expenses recorded for 
unrecognized tax benefits in 2007 as compared to 2006.

Our effective income tax rate  in  2006 was  higher  than  2005 primarily 
as a result of favorable tax settlements and the recognition of capital 
loss carry forwards in 2005. These increases were partially offset by tax 
benefits from foreign operations and lower state taxes in 2006 compared 
to 2005.

A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective 
income tax rate for each period is included in Note 16 to the consoli-
dated financial statements. 

Discontinued Operations 
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 
No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we 
have	classified	TELPRI,	Verizon	Dominicana	and	our	former	domestic	print	
and Internet yellow pages directories publishing operations as discon-
tinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods 
presented through the date of the spin-off or divestiture. 

On March 30, 2007, after receiving Federal Communications Commission 
approval,	 we	 completed	 the	 sale	 of	 our	 52%	 interest	 in	 TELPRI	 and	
received gross proceeds of approximately $980 million. The sale resulted 
in a pretax gain of $120 million ($70 million after-tax, or $.02 per diluted 
share). Additionally, $100 million of the proceeds were contributed to the 
Verizon Foundation. 

The sale of Verizon Dominicana closed in December 2006, and primarily 
due to taxes on previously unremitted earnings, a pretax gain of $30 mil-
lion resulted in an after-tax loss of $541 million (or $.18 per diluted share). 

We completed the spin-off of our domestic print and Internet yellow 
pages directories business to our shareowners on November 17, 2006, 
which  resulted  in  an  $8,695  million  increase  to  contributed  capital  in 
shareowner’s  investment.  In  addition,  we  recorded  pretax  charges  of 
$117 million ($101 million after-tax, or $.03 per diluted share) for costs 
related to this spin-off. These costs primarily consisted of debt retirement 
costs, costs associated with accumulated vested benefits of employees, 
investment banking fees and other transaction costs related to the spin-
off, which are included in discontinued operations. 

Extraordinary Item
In	 January	 2007,	 the	 Bolivarian	 Republic	 of	 Venezuela	 (the	 Republic)	
declared its intent to nationalize certain companies, including CANTV. On 
February 12, 2007, we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding 
(MOU)	 with	 the	 Republic,	 which	 provided	 that	 the	 Republic	 offer	 to	
purchase  all  of  the  equity  securities  of  CANTV,  including  our  28.5% 
interest, through public tender offers in Venezuela and the United States. 
Under  the  terms  of  the  MOU,  the  prices  in  the  tender  offers  would 
be  adjusted  downward  to  reflect  any  dividends  declared  and  paid 
subsequent to February 12, 2007. During the second quarter of 2007, 
the tender offers were completed and Verizon received an aggregate 
amount of approximately $572 million, which included $476 million from 
the tender offers as well as $96 million of dividends declared and paid 
subsequent to the MOU. Based upon our investment balance in CANTV, 
we recorded an extraordinary loss of $131 million, including taxes of $38 
million, or $.05 per diluted share.

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
Effective	 January	 1,	 2006,	 we	 adopted	 SFAS	 No.	 123(R),	 Share-Based 
Payments,  utilizing  the  modified  prospective  method.  The  impact  to 
Verizon primarily resulted from Domestic Wireless, for which we recorded 
a  $42  million  ($.01  per  diluted  share)  cumulative  effect  of  accounting 
change, net of taxes and after minority interest, to recognize the effect of 
initially measuring the outstanding liability for awards granted to Domestic 
Wireless employees at fair value utilizing a Black-Scholes model.

segment results Of OperatiOns

We have two reportable segments, which we operate and manage as 
strategic  business  units  and  organize  by  products  and  services.  Our 
segments are Wireline and Domestic Wireless. You can find additional 
information about our segments in Note 17 to the consolidated financial 
statements.

We measure and evaluate our reportable segments based on segment 
income.  Corporate,  eliminations  and  other  includes  unallocated  cor-
porate expenses, intersegment eliminations recorded in consolidation, 
the results of other businesses such as our wholly-owned insurance and 
leasing subsidiaries, the results of investments in unconsolidated busi-
nesses, primarily Vodafone Omnitel, and other adjustments that are not 
allocated  in  assessing  segment  performance. These  adjustments  also 
include transactions that the chief operating decision makers exclude in 
assessing business unit performance due primarily to their non-recurring 
and/or non-operational nature. Although such transactions are excluded 
from the business segment results, they are included in reported consoli-
dated earnings. Gains and losses that are not individually significant are 
included in all segment results, since these items are included in the chief 
operating decision makers’ assessment of unit performance.

Wireline

Income  from  discontinued  operations,  net  of  tax,  decreased  by  $617 
million, or 81.3% in 2007 compared to 2006. The decrease was primarily 
driven by the assets disposed of in 2006, partially offset by the after-tax 
gain	recorded	in	2007	on	the	sale	of	TELPRI.	Income	from	discontinued	
operations,  net  of  tax,  decreased  by  $611  million,  or  44.6%  in  2006 
compared to 2005. This decrease was primarily due to the after-tax loss 
recorded in 2006 on the sale of Verizon Dominicana, partially offset by the 
cessation of depreciation on fixed assets held for sale. 

The Wireline segment consists of the operations of Verizon Telecom, a 
provider of communication services, including voice, broadband video 
and data, network access, long distance, and other services to residential 
and small business customers and carriers, and Verizon Business, which 
provides next-generation IP network services to medium and large busi-
nesses and government customers globally. Operating results shown for 
2006 exclude the results of the former MCI prior to the date of the merger 
(January 6, 2006).

23

Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

Operating Revenues

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Verizon Telecom
  Mass Markets
  Wholesale
  Other
Verizon Business
  Enterprise Business
  Wholesale
   International and Other
Intrasegment Eliminations
Total	Wireline	Operating	Revenues

$ 21,978
8,086
1,862

$ 22,234
8,336
2,368

$ 20,044
9,084
2,566

14,677
3,345
3,214
(2,846)
$ 50,316

14,296
3,281
3,101
 (2,888)
$ 50,728

6,385
1,386
–
(1,849)
$ 37,616

Verizon Telecom 
Mass Markets
Verizon Telecom’s Mass Markets revenue includes local exchange (basic 
service and end-user access), value-added services, long distance, broad-
band services for residential and certain small business accounts and FiOS 
TV services. Also included are revenues generated from former MCI con-
sumer and small business products and services. Long distance includes 
both regional toll services and long distance services. Broadband services 
include DSL and FiOS data.

Our Mass Markets revenue decreased by $256 million, or 1.2% in 2007, 
and increased by $2,190 million, or 10.9% in 2006. The decrease in 2007 
was  primarily  driven  by  lower  demand  and  usage  of  our  basic  local 
exchange  and  accompanying  services,  attributable  to  consumer  sub-
scriber losses. These losses are driven by competition and technology 
substitution, including wireless and VoIP. These decreases were partially 
offset by growth from broadband services and FiOS TV services and the 
inclusion of the results of operations of the former MCI business subse-
quent to the close of the merger on January 6, 2006, which helped drive 
the increase in 2006 over 2005.

Declines in switched access lines in service of 8.1% in 2007 and 7.6% in 
2006 were mainly driven by the effects of competition and technology 
substitution.	Residential	retail	access	lines	declined	9.5%	in	2007	and	8.8%	
in 2006, as customers substituted wireless, VoIP, broadband and cable ser-
vices for traditional voice landline services. At the same time, business retail 
access lines declined 4.0% in 2007 and 3.2% in 2006, primarily reflecting 
competition and a shift to high-speed access lines. The resulting total 
retail access line loss was 7.6% and 6.9% in 2007 and 2006, respectively. 
Access line losses include the loss of lines served by the former MCI.

We  added  1,253,000  new  broadband  connections,  including  854,000 
for FiOS data in 2007. We ended 2007 with 8,235,000 broadband lines 
in service, including 1,541,000 for FiOS data, representing an increase of 
17.9% compared to 6,982,000 lines in service at December 31, 2006. In 
addition, we added approximately 736,000 FiOS TV customers in 2007 
and ended the year with a total of 943,000, an increase of approximately 
355% compared to 207,000 FiOS TV customers at December 31, 2006. As 
of December 31, 2007, for FiOS data and FiOS TV, we achieved penetra-
tion rates of 20.6% and 16.0%, respectively, across the markets where we 
have been selling these services.

Wholesale
Wholesale  revenues  are  earned  from  long  distance  and  other  com-
peting carriers who use our local exchange facilities to provide services 
to their customers. Switched access revenues are generated from fixed 
and usage-based charges paid by carriers for access to our local network. 
Special access revenues are generated from carriers that buy dedicated 
local  exchange  capacity  to  support  their  private  networks. Wholesale 
services also include local wholesale revenues from unbundled network 
elements (UNEs) and interconnection revenues from competitive local 
exchange carriers (CLECs) and wireless carriers. 

Wholesale revenues decreased by $250 million, or 3.0% in 2007 and by 
$748 million, or 8.2% in 2006, due to declines in switched access rev-
enues and local wholesale revenues (UNEs) and, in 2006, the reduction 
in access revenues billed to the former MCI mass market entities. These 
declines were partially offset by increases in special access revenues. 

Switched minutes of use (MOUs) declined in 2007 and 2006, reflecting 
the impact of access line loss and wireless substitution. Wholesale lines 
decreased by 15.9% in 2007 due to the ongoing impact of a 2005 deci-
sion by a major competitor to deemphasize their local market initiatives. 
Special  access  revenue  growth  reflects  continuing  demand  for  high-
capacity, high-speed digital services, partially offset by lower demand for 
older, low-speed data products and services. As of December 31, 2007, 
customer demand for high-capacity and digital data services increased 
8.2% compared to 2006.

The FCC regulates the rates that we charge customers for interstate access 
services.	See	“Other	Factors	That	May	Affect	Future	Results	–	Regulatory	
and	Competitive	Trends	–	FCC	Regulation”	for	additional	information	on	
FCC rulemaking concerning federal access rates, universal service and 
certain broadband services.

Other	Revenues
Other  revenues  include  such  services  as  operator  services  (including 
deaf  relay  services),  public  (coin)  telephone,  card  services  and  supply 
sales,  as  well  as  dial  around  services  including  10-10-987,  10-10-220, 
1-800-COLLECT and Prepaid Cards.

Verizon  Telecom’s  revenues  from  other  services  decreased  by  $506 
million, or 21.4% in 2007, and by $198 million, or 7.7% in 2006. These rev-
enue decreases were mainly due to the discontinuation of non-strategic 
product lines and reduced business volumes, partially offset by the inclu-
sion of revenues from the former MCI in 2006.

Verizon Business
Enterprise Business
Our  Enterprise  Business  channel  distributes  voice,  data  and  Internet 
communications services to medium and large business customers, multi-
national corporations, and state and federal government customers. In 
addition to communication services, this channel provides value-added 
services that make communications more secure, reliable and efficient. 
Enterprise Business provides managed network services for customers 
that outsource all or portions of their communications and information 
processing operations and data services such as Private IP, Private Line, 
Frame	Relay	and	ATM	services,	both	domestically	and	internationally.	

Enterprise  Business  2007  revenues  of  $14,677  million  increased  by 
$381 million, or 2.7%, as compared to 2006, primarily reflecting growth 
in demand for our strategic products, specifically IP services and man-
aged services, as well as the inclusion of the results of operations of the 

24

 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

former MCI business subsequent to the close of the merger on January 
6, 2006. The IP suite of products is Enterprise Business’ fastest growing 
set of product offerings and includes Private IP, IP VPN, Web Hosting and 
VoIP. Our Enterprise Business channel services many customer accounts 
that are moving from core data products to IP based products. This shift 
in technology is occurring across our customer base. Enterprise Business 
2006  revenues  of  $14,296  million  increased  $7,911  million,  or  123.9% 
compared to 2005 primarily due to the acquisition of MCI. 

Wholesale
Our  Wholesale  revenues  relate  to  domestic  wholesale  services  and 
include all interexchange wholesale traffic sold in the United States, as 
well as internationally destined traffic that originates in the United States. 
The Wholesale line of business is comprised of numerous large and small 
customers that predominately resell voice services to their own customer 
base. A portion of this revenue is generated by a few large telecommuni-
cation carriers, many of whom compete directly with Verizon.

Verizon Business 2007 Wholesale revenues of $3,345 million increased 
by $64 million, or 2.0% as compared to 2006, primarily due to increased 
MOUs in traditional voice products, partially offset by continued rate com-
pression due to competition in the marketplace. During 2006, Verizon 
Business Wholesale revenues of $3,281 million, increased $1,895 million, 
or 136.7%, compared to 2005, primarily due to the MCI acquisition. 

International and Other
Our  International  operations  serve  retail  and  wholesale  customers, 
including enterprise businesses, government entities and telecommu-
nication carriers outside of the United States, primarily in Europe, the 
Middle East and Africa, the Asia Pacific region, Latin America and Canada. 
These operations provide telecommunications services, which include 
voice, data services, Internet and managed network services. 

International and other revenues of $3,214 million during 2007 increased 
by	$113	million,	or	3.6%	as	compared	to	2006.	Revenue	growth	in	our	stra-
tegic products, specifically IP services, was partially offset by competitive 
rate compression and lower volumes with respect to our voice products. 
Our revenues from International and Other in the year ended December 
31,  2006  were  $3,101  million. This  market  represented  a  new  revenue 
stream to Verizon resulting from the MCI acquisition on January 6, 2006.

Operating Expenses

Years Ended December 31,

Cost of services and sales
Selling, general and administrative expense
Depreciation and amortization expense

2007

$ 25,220
11,236
9,184
$ 45,640

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

$ 24,767
11,820
9,590
$ 46,177

$ 15,813
8,210
8,801
$ 32,824

Cost of Services and Sales
Cost of services and sales includes the following costs directly attribut-
able to a service or product: salaries and wages, benefits, materials and 
supplies, contracted services, network access and transport costs, cus-
tomer provisioning costs, computer systems support, costs to support 
our outsourcing contracts and technical facilities, contributions to the 
universal service fund, customer provisioning costs and cost of products 
sold. Aggregate customer care costs, which include billing and service 
provisioning, are allocated between cost of services and sales and selling, 
general and administrative expense.

Cost of services and sales increased by $453 million, or 1.8%, during 2007 
compared to 2006. This increase was primarily due to higher costs asso-
ciated with our growth businesses, annual wage increases and higher 
customer  premise  equipment  costs,  partially  offset  by  productivity 
improvement initiatives and lower switched access lines in service, as 
well as lower wholesale voice connections. 

Cost of services and sales increased by $8,954 million, or 56.6%, in 2006 
compared to 2005. These increases were primarily due to the MCI merger 
in 2006 partially offset by the net impact of other cost changes. Higher 
costs associated with our growth businesses and annual wage increases 
were  partially  offset  by  productivity  improvement  initiatives,  which 
reduced cost of services and sales expenses in 2006. Expenses were also 
impacted  by  increased  net  pension  and  other  postretirement  benefit 
costs. The overall impact of the 2006 assumption changes, combined with 
the impact of lower than expected actual asset returns over the past sev-
eral years, resulted in pension and other postretirement benefit expense 
of $1,408 million in 2006 compared to net pension and postretirement 
benefit expense of $1,248 million in 2005. Expenses decreased in 2006 
due to the discontinuation of non-strategic businesses, including the ter-
mination of a large commercial inventory management contract in 2005.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling,  general  and  administrative  expense  includes  salaries,  wages 
and benefits not directly attributable to a service or product, bad debt 
charges,  taxes  other  than  income,  advertising  and  sales  commission 
costs, customer billing, call center and information technology costs, pro-
fessional service fees and rent for administrative space.

Selling, general and administrative expenses in 2007 decreased by $584 
million or 4.9%, in 2007 compared to 2006. The decrease was primarily 
due to cost reduction initiatives, as well as the impact of gains from real 
estate sales and lower bad debt costs, partially offset by higher adver-
tising costs and the inclusion of the results of operations of the former 
MCI business subsequent to the close of the merger on January 6, 2006.

Selling, general and administrative expenses in 2006 increased by $3,610 
million, or 44.0% compared to 2005. These increases were primarily due 
to the inclusion of expenses from the former MCI in 2006, partially offset 
by  synergy  savings  resulting  from  our  merger  integration  efforts,  the 
impact of gains from real estate sales and lower bad debt costs. 

Depreciation and Amortization Expense
The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense of $406 million, 
or 4.2%, in 2007 compared to 2006 was mainly driven by lower rates of 
depreciation as a result of changes in the estimated useful lives of certain 
asset classes, partially offset by growth in depreciable telephone plant 
from increased capital spending. The increase in depreciation and amor-
tization expense of $789 million, or 9.0% in 2006 compared to 2005 was 
mainly driven by the acquisition of MCI’s depreciable property and equip-
ment and finite-lived intangible assets, including its customer lists and 
capitalized non-network software, and by growth in depreciable tele-
phone plant and non-network software assets. 

Segment Income

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Segment Income

$ 1,506

$

1,625

$

1,906

25

  
  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

Segment income decreased by $119 million, or 7.3% in 2007 and by $281 
million, or 14.7% in 2006, due to the after-tax impact of operating rev-
enues and operating expenses described above, along with the impact 
of favorable income tax adjustments in 2005.

Non-recurring or non-operational items not included in Verizon Wireline’s 
segment income totaled $714 million, $407 million and ($168) million 
in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Non-recurring or non-operational 
items in 2007 included costs associated with severance and other related 
charges, costs incurred related to network, non-network software, and 
other activities in connection with the spin-off of local exchange assets 
in	 Maine,	 New	 Hampshire	 and	 Vermont	 (see	“Recent	 Developments”	
section), as well as costs associated with merger integration initiatives, 
principally related to the acquisition of MCI and other items. Non-recurring 
or non-operational items in 2006 included costs associated with sever-
ance activity, pension settlement losses, Verizon Center relocation-related 
costs and merger integration costs. Merger integration costs primarily 
included costs related to advertising and re-branding initiatives, facility 
exit costs, severance costs, labor and contractor costs related to informa-
tion technology integration initiatives and employee retention expenses. 
Non-recurring or non-operational items in 2005 related to the gain on 
the sale of our Hawaii wireline operations, the net gain on the sale of a 
New York City office building, changes to management retirement ben-
efit plans, severance costs and Verizon Center relocation-related costs.

Domestic Wireless

Our Domestic Wireless segment provides wireless voice and data services, 
other value-added services and equipment sales across the United States. 
This segment primarily represents the operations of the Verizon Wireless 
joint venture with Vodafone. Verizon owns a 55% interest in the joint ven-
ture and Vodafone owns the remaining 45%. All financial results included 
in the tables below reflect the consolidated results of Verizon Wireless.

Operating Revenues

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Service revenues
Equipment and other
Total Domestic  
	 Wireless	Operating	Revenue

$  38,016 
 5,866 

$  32,796 
 5,247 

$  28,131 
 4,170 

$ 43,882 

$ 38,043 

$  32,301 

Domestic Wireless’s  total  operating  revenues  of  $43,882  million  were 
$5,839 million, or 15.3% higher in 2007 compared to 2006. Service rev-
enues of $38,016 million were $5,220 million, or 15.9% higher than 2006. 
The service revenue increase was primarily due to an 11.3% increase in 
customers as of December 31, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006, and 
increased average revenue per customer. Equipment and other revenue 
increased $619 million, or 11.8% in 2007 compared to 2006, principally as 
a result of increases in the number of customers upgrading their wireless 
devices. Other revenue also increased due to increases in cost recovery 
surcharges and regulatory fees.

Total customers as of December 31, 2007 were 65.7 million, of which 97% 
were retail customers, compared to 59.1 million, of which 96% were retail 
customers	at	December	31,	2006.	Retail	(non-wholesale)	customers	are	
customers who are directly served and managed by Verizon Wireless and 
who buy its branded services. Our Domestic Wireless customer base as 
of December 31, 2007 was 93% retail postpaid compared to 92.6% retail 
postpaid at December 31, 2006. Total average monthly churn was 1.21% 
in 2007 compared to 1.17% in 2006. 

Our  Domestic  Wireless  segment  ended  2007  with  63.7  million  retail 
customers, an increase of 6.9 million net new retail customers or 12.2%, 
compared to December 31, 2006. Average monthly retail postpaid churn, 
the rate at which retail postpaid customers disconnect service, was 0.91% 
in 2007, unchanged compared to 2006.

Average retail service revenue per customer per month increased 2.2% to 
$51.57 in 2007 compared to 2006. Average retail data service revenue per 
customer per month increased 43.9% in 2007 compared to 2006 driven 
by increased use of our messaging service, VZAccess, and other data ser-
vices.	Retail	data	revenues	were	$7,309	million	and	accounted	for	19.7%	
of retail service revenue in 2007, compared to $4,445 million and 14.0% 
of retail service revenue in 2006. 

Domestic Wireless’s total operating revenues of $38,043 million in 2006 
increased $5,742 million, or 17.8% compared to 2005. Service revenues of 
$32,796 million were $4,665 million, or 16.6% higher than 2005. The ser-
vice revenue increase was primarily due to a 15.0% increase in customers 
as of December 31, 2006 compared to December 31, 2005, and increased 
average revenue per customer. Equipment and other revenue increased 
$1,077 million, or 25.8% in 2006 compared to 2005 principally as a result 
of increases in the number and price of wireless devices sold. Other rev-
enue  also  increased  due  to  increases  in  regulatory  fees,  primarily  the 
universal service fund and cost recovery surcharges.

Average retail service revenue per customer per month increased 0.7% to 
$50.44 in 2006 compared to 2005. Average retail data service revenue per 
customer per month increased 71.3% in 2006, compared to 2005, driven 
by  increased  use  of  our  messaging,  VZAccess  and  other  data  services. 
However, Domestic Wireless experienced an increase in the proportion 
of customers on its Family Share price plans, which put downward pres-
sure	on	average	service	revenue	per	customer	during	2006.	Retail	data	
revenues were $4,445 million and accounted for 14.0% of retail service 
revenue in 2006, compared to $2,232 million and 8.2% of retail service 
revenue in 2005.

Operating Expenses

Years Ended December 31,

Cost of services and sales
Selling, general and administrative expense
Depreciation and amortization expense

2007

$ 13,456
13,477
5,154
$ 32,087

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

$ 11,491
12,039
4,913
$ 28,443

$

9,393
10,768
4,760
$ 24,921

Cost of Services and Sales
Cost of services and sales, which are costs to operate the wireless net-
work as well as the cost of roaming, long distance and equipment sales, 
increased by $1,965 million, or 17.1% in 2007 compared to 2006. Cost of 
services increased due to higher wireless network costs in 2007 caused 
by increased network usage, partially offset by lower rates for long dis-
tance, roaming and local interconnection. Cost of equipment sales grew 
by 20.2% in 2007 compared to 2006. The increase was primarily attrib-
uted to an increase in equipment upgrades, together with an increase 
in cost per unit as a result of increased sales of higher cost advanced 
wireless devices.

Cost of services and sales increased by $2,098 million, or 22.3% in 2006 
compared to 2005. This increase was primarily due to higher wireless net-
work costs in 2006 caused by increased network usage relating to both 
voice and data services and an increase in cost of equipment sales driven 
by  an  increase  in  wireless  devices  sold,  resulting  from  an  increase  in 
equipment upgrades, together with an increase in cost per unit in 2006.

26

  
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense increased by $1,438 million, 
or 11.9% in 2007 compared to 2006. This increase was primarily due to an 
increase in salary and benefits expense of $641 million, resulting from an 
increase in employees in the sales and customer care areas, and higher 
per  employee  salary  and  benefit  costs.  Sales  commissions  expense 
in  both  our  direct  and  indirect  channels  increased  by  $147  million  in 
2007 compared to 2006, primarily as a result of an increase in customer 
renewals and equipment upgrades. Advertising and promotion expense 
increased $144 million in 2007, compared to 2006. Also contributing to 
the increase were higher costs associated with regulatory fees, which 
increased by $127 million in 2007.

Selling, general and administrative expense increased by $1,271 million, 
or 11.8% in 2006 compared to 2005. This increase was primarily due to an 
increase in salary and benefits expense, as well as advertising and promo-
tion, and regulatory fee increases, compared to 2005. 

Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation  and  amortization  expense  increased  by  $241  million,  or 
4.9% in 2007 compared to 2006 and increased by $153 million, or 3.2% 
in  2006  compared  to  2005. These  increases  were  primarily  due  to  an 
increase in depreciable assets. Partially offsetting this increase in 2007 
was lower amortization expense resulting from customer lists becoming 
fully amortized during 2006.

Segment Income

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Segment Income

$ 3,794

$

2,976

$

2,219

Segment income increased by $818 million, or 27.5% in 2007 compared 
to 2006 and increased by $757 million, or 34.1% in 2006 compared to 
2005, primarily as a result of the after-tax impact of operating revenues 
and  operating  expenses  described  above,  partially  offset  by  higher 
minority interest expense. Segment income in 2006 excludes $42 million 
after-tax	due	to	the	adoption	of	SFAS	No.	123(R).	

Increases  in  minority  interest  expense  in  2007  and  2006  were  due  to 
the increased income of the wireless joint venture and the significant 
minority interest attributable to Vodafone.

Other items

Merger Integration Costs

In 2007 and 2006, we recorded pretax charges of $178 million ($112 mil-
lion after-tax, or $.04 per diluted share) and $232 million ($146 million 
after-tax, or $.05 per diluted share), respectively, primarily associated with 
the MCI acquisition in 2006 that were comprised of advertising and other 
costs related to re-branding initiatives, facility exit costs and systems inte-
gration activities. 

Tax Matters

In December 2007, Verizon received a net distribution from Vodafone 
Omnitel  of  approximately  $2.1  billion  and  we  anticipate  that  we  may 
receive an additional distribution from Vodafone Omnitel within the next 
twelve months. As a result, we recorded $610 million ($.21 per diluted 
share) of foreign and domestic taxes and expenses specifically relating to 
our share of Vodafone Omnitel’s distributable earnings. 

During 2005, we recorded tax benefits of $336 million ($.12 per diluted 
share) in connection with the utilization of prior year loss carry forwards. 
As a result of the capital gain realized in 2005 in connection with the 
sale of our Hawaii businesses, we recorded a tax benefit of $242 million 
related to the capital losses incurred in previous years. 

Also during 2005, we recorded a net tax provision of $206 million ($.07 
per diluted share) related to the repatriation of foreign earnings under 
the provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, for two of our 
foreign investments.

Facility and Employee-Related Items

During the fourth quarter of 2007, we recorded a charge of $772 million 
($477  million  after-tax,  or  $.16  per  diluted  share)  primarily  in  connec-
tion with workforce reductions of 9,000 employees and related charges, 
4,000 of whom were terminated in the fourth quarter of 2007 with the 
remaining reductions expected to occur throughout 2008. In addition, 
we adjusted our actuarial assumptions for severance to align with future 
expectations. 

During 2006, we recorded net pretax severance, pension and benefits 
charges of $425 million ($258 million after-tax, or $.09 per diluted share). 
These charges included net pretax pension settlement losses of $56 mil-
lion ($26 million after-tax, or $.01 per diluted share) related to employees 
that received lump-sum distributions primarily resulting from our separa-
tion plans. These charges were recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 88, 
Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit 
Pension Plans and for Termination (SFAS No. 88), which requires that set-
tlement losses be recorded once prescribed payment thresholds have 
been reached. Also included are pretax charges of $369 million ($228 
million after-tax, or $.08 per diluted share), for employee severance and 
severance-related costs in connection with the involuntary separation of 
approximately 4,100 employees. In addition, during 2005 we recorded 
a charge of $59 million ($36 million after-tax, or $.01 per diluted share) 
associated with employee severance costs and severance-related activi-
ties  in  connection  with  the  voluntary  separation  program  for  surplus 
union-represented employees. 

During 2006, we recorded pretax charges of $184 million ($118 million 
after-tax, or $.04 per diluted share) in connection with the relocation of 
employees	and	business	operations	to	Verizon	Center	in	Basking	Ridge,	
New Jersey. During 2005, we recorded a net pretax gain of $18 million 
($8 million after-tax) in connection with the relocation, including a pretax 
gain  of  $120  million  ($72  million  after-tax,  or  $.03  per  diluted  share) 
related to the sale of a New York City office building, partially offset by 
a pretax charge of $102 million ($64 million after-tax, or $.02 per diluted 
share),  primarily  associated  with  relocation,  employee  severance  and 
related activities. 

During 2005, we reported a net pretax charge of $98 million ($59 mil-
lion after-tax, or $.02 per diluted share) related to the restructuring of the 
Verizon management retirement benefit plans. This pretax charge was 
recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 88, and SFAS No. 106, Employers’ 
Accounting for the Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions (SFAS No. 
106)  and  includes  the  unamortized  cost  of  prior  pension  enhance-
ments  of  $430  million  offset  partially  by  a  pretax  curtailment  gain  of 
$332 million related to retiree medical benefits. In connection with this 
restructuring, management employees: no longer earn pension benefits 
or earn service towards the company retiree medical subsidy after June, 
2006; received an 18-month enhancement of the value of their pension 
and retiree medical subsidy; and receive a higher savings plan matching 
contribution. 

27

  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

Other

In 2006, we recorded pretax charges of $26 million ($16 million after-
tax, or $.01 per diluted share) resulting from the extinguishment of debt 
assumed in connection with the completion of the MCI merger. 

During 2005, we recorded pretax charges of $139 million ($133 million 
after-tax, or $.05 per diluted share) including a pretax impairment charge 
of  $125  million  ($125  million  after-tax,  or  $.04  per  diluted  share)  per-
taining to aircraft leased to airlines involved in bankruptcy proceedings 
and a pretax charge of $14 million ($8 million after-tax, or less than $.01 
per diluted share) in connection with the early extinguishment of debt.

COnsOlidated  finanCial COnditiOn 

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Cash Flows Provided By (Used In)
  Operating Activities:

  Continuing operations
  Discontinued operations
Investing Activities:
  Continuing operations
  Discontinued operations

  Financing activities:

  Continuing operations
  Discontinued operations

$ 26,309
(570)

$ 23,030
1,076

$ 20,444
1,581

(16,865)
757

(17,422)
1,806

(18,136)
(356)

(11,697)
–

(5,752)
(279)

(4,958)
(76)

Increase (Decrease) In Cash and Cash 
Equivalents

$ (2,066)

$

2,459

$

(1,501)

We  use  the  net  cash  generated  from  our  operations  to  fund  network 
expansion and modernization, repay external financing, pay dividends 
and invest in new businesses. Additional external financing is obtained 
when  necessary.  While  our  current  liabilities  typically  exceed  current 
assets, our sources of funds, primarily from operations and, to the extent 
necessary,  from  readily  available  external  financing  arrangements,  are 
sufficient  to  meet  ongoing  operating  and  investing  requirements. We 
expect that capital spending requirements will continue to be financed 
primarily through internally generated funds. Additional debt or equity 
financing may be needed to fund additional development activities or to 
maintain our capital structure to ensure our financial flexibility.

Cash Flows Provided By Operating Activities

Our primary source of funds continues to be cash generated from opera-
tions. In total, cash from operating activities in 2007 increased compared 
to the similar period of 2006. The increase was due to higher cash flow 
from continuing operations, partially offset by decreased cash flow from 
discontinued operations. The increase in cash flow from operating activi-
ties – continuing operations in 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily due 
to the distributions from Vodafone Omnitel and CANTV, increased oper-
ating cash flows from Domestic Wireless and lower interest payments on 
outstanding debt, partially offset by changes in working capital.

The decrease in cash flow from operating activities - discontinued opera-
tions  in  2007  compared  to  2006  was  primarily  due  to  income  taxes 
paid in 2007 related to the fourth quarter 2006 disposition of Verizon 
Dominicana, as well as the disposal of the discontinued operations in the 
fourth quarter of 2006.

In  2006,  the  increase  in  cash  from  operating  activities  compared  to 
2005 was primarily due to higher earnings at Domestic Wireless, which 
included higher minority interest earnings, and lower dividends paid to 
minority partners. Total minority interest earnings, net of dividends paid 
to minority interest partners, was $3.2 billion in 2006 compared to $1.7 
billion in 2005. In addition, higher operating cash flow in 2006 compared 
to 2005 was due to lower cash taxes paid in 2006, resulting from 2005 tax 
payments related to foreign operations and investments sold during the 
fourth quarter of 2004. Partially offsetting these increases were significant 
2005 repatriations of foreign earnings of unconsolidated businesses. 

Operating  cash  flows  from  discontinued  operations  decreased  $505 
million to $1,076 million in 2006 from $1,581 million in 2005 due to the 
completion of our domestic print and Internet yellow pages directories 
business  spin-off  on  November  17,  2006  and  the  close  of  the  sale  of 
Verizon Dominicana on December 1, 2006, partially offset by the oper-
ating activities of the remaining assets held for sale. 

  Cash Flows Used In Investing Activities

Capital expenditures continue to be our primary use of cash flows from 
operations, as they facilitate the introduction of new products and ser-
vices, enhance responsiveness to competitive challenges and increase 
the operating efficiency and productivity of our networks. Including capi-
talized software, we invested $10,956 million in our Wireline business in 
2007, compared to $10,259 million and $8,267 million in 2006 and 2005, 
respectively. We also invested $6,503 million in our Domestic Wireless 
business in 2007, compared to $6,618 million and $6,484 million in 2006 
and  2005,  respectively. The  increase  in  capital  spending  at Wireline  is 
mainly driven by increased spending in high growth areas such as fiber 
optic to the premises. Capital spending at Domestic Wireless represents 
our continuing effort to invest in this high growth business. 

In 2008, capital expenditures, including capitalized software, are expected 
to be lower than 2007 expenditures.

In 2007, we paid $417 million, net of cash received, to acquire a security-
services firm and $180 million to purchase several wireless properties 
and  licenses.  In  2006,  we  invested  $1,422  million  in  acquisitions  and 
investments in businesses, including $2,809 million to acquire thirteen 
20 MHz licenses in connection with the FCC Advanced Wireless Services 
auction and $57 million to acquire other wireless properties. This was 
offset by MCI’s cash balances of $2,361 million we acquired at the date 
of the merger. In 2005, we invested $4,684 million in acquisitions and 
investments in businesses, including $3,003 million to acquire NextWave 
Telecom  Inc.  (NextWave)  personal  communications  services  licenses, 
$641 million to acquire 63 broadband wireless licenses in connection with 
FCC auction 58, $419 million to purchase Qwest Wireless, LLC’s spectrum 
licenses and wireless network assets in several existing and new markets, 
$230 million to purchase spectrum from MetroPCS, Inc. and $297 million 
for other wireless properties and licenses. In 2005, we received cash pro-
ceeds of $1,326 million in connection with the sale of Verizon’s wireline 
operations in Hawaii. 

Our short-term investments principally include cash equivalents held in 
trust accounts for payment of employee benefits. In 2007, 2006 and 2005, 
we invested $1,693 million, $1,915 million and $1,955 million, respec-
tively, in short-term investments, primarily to pre-fund active employees’ 
health  and  welfare  benefits.  Proceeds  from  the  sales  of  all  short-term 
investments, principally for the payment of these benefits, were $1,862 
million, $2,205 million and $1,609 million in the years 2007, 2006 and 
2005, respectively.

28

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

Other, net investing activities during 2007 primarily include cash proceeds 
of approximately $800 million from property sales and sales of select non-
strategic assets, as well as $476 million from the disposition of our interest 
in CANTV. Other, net investing activities for 2006 primarily include cash 
proceeds of $283 million from property sales. Other, net investing activi-
ties for 2005 primarily include a net investment of $913 million for the 
purchase of 43.4 million shares of MCI common stock from eight entities 
affiliated with Carlos Slim Helú, offset by cash proceeds of $713 million 
from property sales, including a New York City office building, and $349 
million of repatriated proceeds from the sales of European investments 
in prior years. 

In 2007, investing activities of discontinued operations primarily included 
gross proceeds of approximately $980 million in connection with the 
sale	 of	TELPRI.	 In	 2006,	 investing	 activities	 of	 discontinued	 operations	
included  net  pretax  cash  proceeds  of  $2,042  million  in  connection 
with  the  sale  of  Verizon  Dominicana.  In  2005,  investing  activities  of 
discontinued operations primarily related to capital expenditures related 
to discontinued operations. 

Cash Flows Used In Financing Activities

In 2007, our total debt was reduced by $5.2 billion, due to the repay-
ment of approximately $1.7 billion of Wireline debt, including the early 
repayment of previously guaranteed $300 million 7% debentures issued 
by Verizon South Inc. and $480 million 7% debentures issued by Verizon 
New England Inc., as well as approximately $1.6 billion of other borrow-
ings.  Also,  we  redeemed  $1,580  million  principal  of  our  outstanding 
floating rate notes, which were called on January 8, 2007, and the $500 
million 7.90% debentures issued by GTE Corporation. Partially offsetting 
the reduction in total debt were cash proceeds of $3,402 million in con-
nection with fixed and floating rate debt issued during 2007. 

Our total debt was reduced by $1,896 million in 2006. We repaid $6,838 
million of Wireline debt, including premiums associated with the retire-
ment  of  $5,665  million  of  aggregate  principal  amount  of  long-term 
debt assumed in connection with the MCI merger. The Wireline repay-
ments also included the early retirement/prepayment of $697 million of 
long-term debt and $155 million of other long-term debt at maturity. 
We repaid approximately $2.5 billion of Domestic Wireless 5.375% fixed 
rate notes that matured on December 15, 2006. Also, we redeemed the 
$1,375 million accreted principal of our remaining zero-coupon convert-
ible notes and retired $482 million of other corporate long-term debt at 
maturity. These repayments were partially offset by our issuance of long-
term debt with a total aggregate principal amount of $4 billion, resulting 
in cash proceeds of $3,958 million, net of discounts, issuance costs and 
the receipt of cash proceeds related to hedges on the interest rate of an 
anticipated financing. In connection with the spin-off of our domestic 
print  and  Internet  yellow  pages  directories  business,  we  received  net 
cash proceeds of approximately $2 billion and retired debt in the aggre-
gate principal amount of approximately $7 billion.

Cash of $240 million was used to reduce our total debt in 2005. We repaid 
$1,533 million of Domestic Wireless, $1,183 million of Wireline and $1,109 
million of Verizon corporate long-term debt. The Wireline debt repayment 
included the early retirement of $350 million of long-term debt and $806 
million of other long-term debt at maturity. This decrease was largely 

offset by the issuance by Verizon corporate of long-term debt with a total 
principal amount of $1,500 million, resulting in total cash proceeds of 
$1,478 million, net of discounts and costs, and an increase in our short-
term borrowings of $2,098 million.

Our ratio of debt to debt combined with shareowners’ equity was 38.1% 
at December 31, 2007 compared to 42.8% at December 31, 2006.

As of December 31, 2007, we had no bank borrowings outstanding. We 
also had approximately $6.2 billion of unused bank lines of credit (including 
a $6 billion three-year committed facility that expires in September 2009 
and various other facilities totaling approximately $400 million) and we 
had shelf registrations for the issuance of up to $8 billion of unsecured 
debt securities. The debt securities of Verizon and our telephone subsid-
iaries continue to be accorded high ratings by primary rating agencies. 
In July 2007, S&P revised its outlook to stable from negative and affirmed 
its long term rating of A. Other long-term ratings of Verizon are: Moody’s 
A3 with stable outlook; and Fitch A+ with stable outlook. The short-term 
ratings of Verizon are: Moody’s P-2; S&P A-1; and Fitch F1.

We and our consolidated subsidiaries are in compliance with all of our 
debt covenants.

In February 2008, we issued $4,000 million of fixed rate notes with varying 
maturities that resulted in cash proceeds of $3,953 million, net of dis-
count and issuance costs.

As in prior years, dividend payments were a significant use of cash flows 
from operations. We continuously evaluate the level of our dividend pay-
ments by considering such factors as long-term growth opportunities, 
internal  cash  requirements  and  the  expectations  of  our  shareowners. 
During the first half of 2007, Verizon announced quarterly cash dividends 
of $.405 per share. During the third quarter of 2007, we increased our 
dividend payments 6.2% to $.43 per share from $.405 per share. In the 
third and fourth quarters of 2007, Verizon declared a quarterly cash divi-
dend of $.43 per share. In 2006 and 2005, Verizon declared quarterly cash 
dividends of $.405 per share. 

Common stock has been used from time to time to satisfy some of the 
funding requirements of employee and shareowner plans. On March 1, 
2007,  the  Board  of  Directors  determined  that  no  additional  common 
shares  could  be  purchased  under  previously  authorized  share  repur-
chase programs and gave authorization to repurchase up to 100 million 
common  shares  terminating  no  later  than  the  close  of  business  on 
February 28, 2010. During 2007, we repurchased $2,843 million of our 
common stock. We plan to continue our share buyback program in 2008. 
Additionally, we received $1,274 million of cash proceeds from the sale of 
common stock, primarily due to the exercise of stock options. On February 
7, 2008, the Board of Directors replaced this share buy back program with 
a new program for the repurchase of up to 100 million common shares 
terminating no later than the close of business on February 28, 2011. The 
Board also determined that no additional shares were to be purchased 
under the prior program.

Increase (Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents

Our cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2007 totaled $1,153 mil-
lion, a $2,066 million decrease compared to cash and cash equivalents at 
December 31, 2006. Our cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2006 
totaled $3,219 million, a $2,459 million increase compared to cash and 
cash equivalents at December 31, 2005 of $760 million.

29

Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

Employee Benefit Plan Funded Status and Contributions

Leasing Arrangements

We are the lessor in leveraged and direct financing lease agreements for 
commercial aircraft and power generating facilities, which comprise the 
majority of the portfolio along with telecommunications equipment, real 
estate property and other equipment. These leases have remaining terms 
up to 48 years as of December 31, 2007. Minimum lease payments receiv-
able represent unpaid rentals, less principal and interest on third-party 
nonrecourse debt relating to leveraged lease transactions. Since we have 
no general liability for this debt, which holds a senior security interest in 
the leased equipment and rentals, the related principal and interest have 
been offset against the minimum lease payments receivable in accor-
dance with generally accepted accounting principles. All recourse debt 
is	reflected	in	our	consolidated	balance	sheets.	See	“Other	Items”	for	a	
discussion of lease impairment charges.

We operate numerous qualified and nonqualified pension plans and other 
postretirement benefit plans. These plans primarily relate to our domestic 
business units. The majority of Verizon’s pension plans are adequately 
funded. We contributed $612 million, $451 million and $593 million in 
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, to our qualified pension plans. We also 
contributed $125 million, $117 million and $105 million to our nonquali-
fied pension plans in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Based  on  the  funded  status  of  the  plans  at  December  31,  2007,  
we  anticipate  qualified  pension  trust  contributions  of  $350  million  
in 2008. Our estimate of required qualified pension trust contributions  
for 2009 is approximately $300 million. Nonqualified pension contribu-
tions are estimated to be approximately $130 million for both 2008 and 
2009, respectively.

Contributions to our other postretirement benefit plans generally relate 
to payments for benefits on an as-incurred basis since the other postre-
tirement benefit plans do not have funding requirements similar to the 
pension plans. We contributed $1,048 million, $1,099 million and $1,040 
million to our other postretirement benefit plans in 2007, 2006 and 2005, 
respectively. Contributions to our other postretirement benefit plans are 
estimated to be approximately $1,580 million in 2008 and $1,770 million 
in 2009. 

Refer	to	Note	1	in	the	consolidated	financial	statements	for	a	discussion	of	
the adoption of SFAS No. 158, which was effective December 31, 2006.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table provides a summary of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments at December 31, 2007. Additional detail about 
these items is included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Contractual Obligations

Long-term debt (see Note 11)
Capital lease obligations (see Note 10)
Total long-term debt, including current maturities
Interest on long-term debt (see Note 11)
Operating leases (see Note 10)
Purchase obligations (see Note 20)
Income Tax Audit Settlements* 

(see Note 16)

Other long-term liabilities (see Note 15)
Total contractual obligations

Payments Due By Period

Total

Less than
1 year

1-3 years

3-5 years

$ 30,455
312
30,767
21,116
7,001
844

233
4,190
$ 64,151

$

$

2,518
46
2,564
1,897
1,489
613

233
2,020
8,816

$

5,781
93
5,874
3,350
2,292
188

–
2,170
$ 13,874

$

6,891
71
6,962
2,622
1,253
33

–
–
$ 10,870

 (dollars in millions)

More than
5 years

$ 15,265
102
15,367
13,247
1,967
10

–
–
$ 30,591

*  The $233 million of income tax audit settlements include gross unrecognized tax benefits of $148 million as determined under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation  

No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48) and related gross interest of $85 million. We are not able to make a reliable estimate of when the balance of $2,735 million  
of unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties will be settled with the respective taxing authorities until issues or examinations are further developed (see Note 16).

Guarantees

In connection with the execution of agreements for the sale of businesses 
and investments, Verizon ordinarily provides representations and warran-
ties to the purchasers pertaining to a variety of nonfinancial matters, such 
as ownership of the securities being sold, as well as financial losses. 

As of December 31, 2007, letters of credit totaling $225 million were exe-
cuted in the normal course of business, which support several financing 
arrangements and payment obligations to third parties. 

30

 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

market risk 

We  are  exposed  to  various  types  of  market  risk  in  the  normal  course 
of business, including the impact of interest rate changes, foreign cur-
rency  exchange  rate  fluctuations,  changes  in  equity  investment  and 
commodity prices and changes in corporate tax rates. We employ risk 
management strategies using a variety of derivatives, including interest 
rate swap agreements, interest rate locks, foreign currency forwards and 
commodity swaps. We do not hold derivatives for trading purposes.

It is our general policy to enter into interest rate, foreign currency and 
other derivative transactions only to the extent necessary to achieve our 
desired objectives in limiting our exposure to the various market risks. 
Our objectives include maintaining a mix of fixed and variable rate debt 
to lower borrowing costs within reasonable risk parameters and to pro-
tect  against  earnings  and  cash  flow  volatility  resulting  from  changes 
in market conditions. We do not hedge our market risk exposure in a 
manner that would completely eliminate the effect of changes in interest 
rates, commodity prices and foreign exchange rates on our earnings. We 
do not expect that our net income, liquidity and cash flows will be mate-
rially affected by these risk management strategies.

Interest Rate Risk

The table that follows summarizes the fair values of our long-term debt 
and interest rate derivatives as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. The table 
also provides a sensitivity analysis of the estimated fair values of these 
financial instruments assuming 100-basis-point upward and downward 
shifts in the yield curve. Our sensitivity analysis does not include the fair 
values of our commercial paper and bank loans, if any, because they are 
not significantly affected by changes in market interest rates.

At December 31, 2007

Fair Value

Fair Value
 assuming
+100 basis
 point shift

(dollars in millions)
Fair Value
 assuming
–100 basis
 point shift

Long-term debt and interest 
rate derivatives

At December 31, 2006

Long-term debt and interest 
rate derivatives

$

31,930

$

30,154

$

33,957

$

33,569

$

31,724

$

35,607

Foreign Currency Translation

The  functional  currency  for  our  foreign  operations  is  primarily  the 
local currency. The translation of income statement and balance sheet 
amounts of our foreign operations into U.S. dollars are recorded as cumu-
lative translation adjustments, which are included in Accumulated Other 
Comprehensive  Loss  in  our  consolidated  balance  sheets. The  transla-
tion gains and losses of foreign currency transactions and balances are 
recorded in the consolidated statements of income in Other Income and 
(Expense), Net and Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax. At 
December 31, 2007, our primary translation exposure was to the British 
Pound and the Euro. 

During 2007, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge 
a portion of our net investment in Vodafone Omnitel. Changes in fair value 
of these contracts due to Euro exchange rate fluctuations are recognized 
in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and partially offset the impact 
of foreign currency changes on the value of our net investment. As of 
December 31, 2007, Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss includes 
unrecognized losses of approximately $57 million ($37 million after-tax) 

related to these hedge contracts, which along with the unrealized for-
eign currency translation balance on the investment hedged, remain in 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss until the investment is sold. We 
have not hedged our accounting translation exposure to foreign currency 
fluctuations relative to the carrying value of our other investments. 

CritiCal aCCOunting estimates and 
reCent  aCCOunting prOnOunCements

Critical Accounting Estimates 

A summary of the critical accounting estimates used in preparing our 
financial statements are as follows:

•	 Verizon’s  plant,  property  and  equipment  balance  represents  a  sig-
nificant  component  of  our  consolidated  assets.  Depreciation  expense 
on  Verizon’s  local  telephone  operations  is  principally  based  on  the 
composite  group  remaining  life  method  and  straight-line  composite 
rates, which provides for the recognition of the cost of the remaining 
net investment in telephone plant, less anticipated net salvage value, 
over  the  remaining  asset  lives.  We  depreciate  other  plant,  property 
and  equipment  generally  on  a  straight-line  basis  over  the  estimated 
useful life of the assets. Changes in the remaining useful lives of assets 
as a result of technological change or other changes in circumstances, 
including  competitive  factors  in  the  markets  where  we  operate,  can 
have a significant impact on asset balances and depreciation expense.

•	 We maintain benefit plans for most of our employees, including pen-
sion  and  other  postretirement  benefit  plans.  In  the  aggregate,  the 
fair  value  of  pension  plan  assets  exceeds  benefit  obligations,  which 
contributes  to  pension  plan  income.  Other  postretirement  benefit 
plans  have  larger  benefit  obligations  than  plan  assets,  resulting  in 
expense. Significant benefit plan assumptions, including the discount 
rate used, the long-term rate of return on plan assets and health care 
trend  rates  are  periodically  updated  and  impact  the  amount  of  ben-
efit  plan  income,  expense,  assets  and  obligations  (see “Consolidated 
Results	 of	 Operations	 –	 Consolidated	 Operating	 Expenses	 –	 Pension	
and	Other	Postretirement	Benefits”).	A	sensitivity	analysis	of	the	impact	
of  changes  in  these  assumptions  on  the  benefit  obligations  and 
expense (income) recorded as of December 31, 2007 and for the year 
then ended pertaining to Verizon’s pension and postretirement benefit 
plans is provided in the table below. 

Percentage
point
change

Benefit obligation
increase 
(decrease) at
December 31, 2007

(dollars in millions)
Expense increase
(decrease) for the
 year ended
December 31, 2007

Pension plans 
  discount rate

Long-term rate of return
  on pension plan assets

Postretirement plans
  discount rate

Long-term rate of return
  on postretirement 
  plan assets

Health care trend rates

+ 0.50
- 0.50

+ 1.00
- 1.00

+ 0.50
- 0.50

+ 1.00
- 1.00

+ 1.00
- 1.00

$

(1,768)
1,886

$

–
–

(1,442)
1,579

–
–

3,038
(2,512)

(64)
109

(374)
374

(117)
118

(37)
37

489
(378)

31

 
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

•	 Our current and deferred income taxes, and associated valuation allow-
ances, are impacted by events and transactions arising in the normal 
course of business as well as in connection with the adoption of new 
accounting  standards,  acquisitions  of  businesses  and  non-recurring 
items.  Assessment  of  the  appropriate  amount  and  classification  of 
income  taxes  is  dependent  on  several  factors,  including  estimates 
of  the  timing  and  realization  of  deferred  income  tax  assets  and  the 
timing of income tax payments. Actual collections and payments may 
materially differ from these estimates as a result of changes in tax laws 
as well as unanticipated future transactions impacting related income 
tax  balances.  We  account  for  tax  benefits  taken  or  expected  to  be 
taken in our tax returns in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48, 
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48), which requires the 
use of a two-step approach for recognizing and measuring tax benefits 
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and disclosures regarding 
uncertainties in income tax positions. 

•	 Goodwill  and  other  intangible  assets  are  a  significant  component  of 
our consolidated assets. Wireline goodwill of $4,900 million represents 
the  largest  component  of  our  goodwill  and,  as  required  by  SFAS  No. 
142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142), is periodically 
evaluated  for  impairment.  The  evaluation  of  Wireline  goodwill  for 
impairment is primarily based on a discounted cash flow model that 
includes  estimates  of  future  cash  flows. There  is  inherent  subjectivity 
involved  in  estimating  future  cash  flows,  which  can  have  a  material 
impact on the amount of any potential impairment. Wireless licenses 
of $50,796 million represent the largest component of our intangible 
assets. Our wireless licenses are indefinite-lived intangible assets, and 
as  required  by  SFAS  No.  142,  are  not  amortized  but  are  periodically 
evaluated for impairment. Any impairment loss would be determined 
by comparing the aggregated fair value of the wireless licenses with 
the  aggregated  carrying  value. The  direct  value  approach  is  used  to 
determine fair value by estimating future cash flows. There is inherent 
subjectivity involved in estimating future cash flows, which can have a 
material impact on the amount of any impairment.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Business Combinations
In	December	2007,	the	FASB	issued	SFAS	No.	141(R),	Business Combinations 
(SFAS	 No.	 141(R)),	 to	 replace	 SFAS	 No.	 141,	 Business  Combinations. 
SFAS	No.	141(R)	requires	use	of	the	acquisition	method	of	accounting,	
defines the acquirer, establishes the acquisition date and broadens the 
scope to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains 
control over one or more other businesses. This statement is effective 
for business combinations or transactions entered into for fiscal years 
beginning  on  or  after  December  15,  2008. We  are  still  evaluating  the 
impact	of	SFAS	No.	141(R),	however,	the	adoption	of	this	statement	is	not	
expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results  
of operations.

Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests 
in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51, (SFAS 
No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards 
for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the retained interest 
and gain or loss when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. This statement is 
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning on or 
after December 15, 2008. Upon the initial adoption of this statement we 
will change the classification and presentation of Noncontrolling Interest 
in  our  financial  statements,  which  we  currently  refer  to  as  minority 
interest. We are still evaluating the impact SFAS No. 160 will have, but 
we do not expect a material impact on our financial position or results 
of operations.

Fair Value Measurements
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for 
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of SFAS 
115 (SFAS No. 159), which permits but does not require us to measure 
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Unrealized gains 
and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are 
reported in earnings. This statement is effective for financial statements 
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. As we will not 
elect to fair value any of our financial instruments under the provisions of 
SFAS No. 159, the adoption of this statement effective January 1, 2008 will 
not have an impact on our financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurement 
(SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework 
for measuring fair value in GAAP and establishes a hierarchy that catego-
rizes and prioritizes the sources to be used to estimate fair value. SFAS 
No.  157  also  expands  financial  statement  disclosures  about  fair  value 
measurements. On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 
(FSP) 157-2 which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year, 
for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that 
are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on 
a  recurring  basis  (at  least  annually).  SFAS  No.  157  and  FSP  157-2  are 
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after 
November 15, 2007. We will elect a partial deferral of SFAS No. 157 under 
the provisions of FSP 157-2 related to the measurement of fair value used 
when evaluating goodwill, other intangible assets, wireless licenses and 
other long-lived assets for impairment and valuing asset retirement obli-
gations and liabilities for exit or disposal activities. The impact of partially 
adopting SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008 will not be material to 
our financial statements.

Refer	to	Note	1	in	the	consolidated	financial	statements	for	a	discussion	
of the accounting pronouncements adopted during 2007.

32

Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

Other faCtOrs that may affeC t future results

Recent Developments 

Rural Cellular Corporation
In late July 2007, Verizon Wireless announced that it had entered into an 
agreement	to	acquire	Rural	Cellular	Corporation	(Rural	Cellular),	for	$45	
per share in cash (or approximately $757 million). As a result of the acqui-
sition,	Verizon	Wireless	will	assume	Rural	Cellular’s	outstanding	debt.	The	
total	value	of	the	transaction	is	approximately	$2.7	billion.	Rural	Cellular	
has more than 700,000 customers in markets adjacent to Verizon Wireless’s 
existing	customer	service	areas.	Rural	Cellular’s	networks	are	located	in	
the states of Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, New York, Massachusetts, 
Alabama, Mississippi, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, 
Kansas,	 Idaho,	 Washington,	 and	 Oregon.	 Rural	 Cellular’s	 shareholders	
approved the transaction on October 4, 2007. The acquisition, which is 
subject to regulatory approvals, is expected to close in the first half of 
2008.

In a related transaction, on December 3, 2007, Verizon Wireless signed a 
definitive exchange agreement with AT&T. Under the terms of the agree-
ment, Verizon Wireless will receive cellular operating markets in Madison 
and  Mason,  KY,  and  10MHz  PCS  licenses  in  Las Vegas,  NV;  Buffalo,  NY; 
Sunbury-Shamokin and Erie, PA; and Youngstown, OH. Verizon Wireless 
will also receive minority interests held by AT&T in three entities in which 
Verizon Wireless also holds an interest plus a cash payment. In exchange, 
Verizon Wireless  will  transfer  to  AT&T  six  cellular  operating  markets  in 
Burlington, Franklin and the northern portion of Addison, VT; Franklin, NY; 
and Okanogan and Ferry, WA; and a cellular license for the Kentucky-6 
market. The operating markets Verizon Wireless is exchanging are among 
those	it	is	to	acquire	from	Rural	Cellular.	The	exchange	with	AT&T	is	subject	
to regulatory approvals and is expected to close in the first half of 2008.

Telephone Access Lines Spin-off
On January 16, 2007, we announced a definitive agreement with FairPoint 
that will result in Verizon establishing a separate entity for its local exchange 
and  related  business  assets  in  Maine,  New  Hampshire  and  Vermont, 
spinning off that new entity into a newly formed company, known as 
Northern New England Spinco Inc. (Spinco), to Verizon’s shareowners, and 
immediately merging it with and into FairPoint. These local exchange and 
business assets are included in Verizon’s continuing operations. It is antici-
pated that as long as all conditions are satisfied and assuming completion 
of the related financing transactions, both the spin-off of Spinco to Verizon 
shareowners and the merger of Spinco with FairPoint will occur on March 
31, 2008. Verizon’s Board of Directors established a record date of March 
7, 2008, and a closing date of March 31, 2008, for the proposed spin-off of 
shares of Spinco to Verizon shareowners.

During 2007, we recorded pretax charges of $84 million ($80 million after-
tax, or $.03 per diluted share) for costs incurred related to certain network 
and work center re-arrangements, the isolation and extraction of related 
business information, and other activities to separate the wireline facili-
ties and operations in Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont from Verizon 
at the closing of the transaction, as well as professional advisory and legal 
fees in connection with this transaction. 

Upon the closing of the transaction, Verizon shareowners will own approx-
imately 60 percent of the new company, and FairPoint shareowners will 
own approximately 40 percent. Verizon Communications will not receive 
any shares in FairPoint as a result of the transaction. In connection with 
the merger, Verizon shareowners will receive one share of FairPoint stock 
for approximately every 53 shares of Verizon stock held as of the record 

date. The proposal relating to the merger was approved by the FairPoint 
shareowners in August 2007. Both the spin-off and merger are expected 
to qualify as tax-free transactions, except to the extent that cash is paid to 
Verizon shareowners in lieu of fractional shares.

Based upon the number of shares (as adjusted) and price of FairPoint 
common	 stock	 (NYSE:	 FRP)	 on	 the	 date	 of	 the	 announcement	 of	 the	
merger, the estimated total value to be received by Verizon and its shar-
eowners  in  exchange  for  these  operations  was  approximately  $2,715 
million. This  consisted  of  (a)  approximately  $1,015  million  of  FairPoint 
common stock that was to be received by Verizon shareowners in the 
merger, and (b) $1,700 million in value that was to be received by Verizon 
through a combination of cash distributions to Verizon and debt securi-
ties issued to Verizon prior to the spin-off. Verizon currently intends to 
exchange these newly issued debt securities for certain debt that was 
previously issued by Verizon, which would have the effect of reducing 
Verizon’s then-outstanding debt. The actual total value to be received 
by Verizon and its shareowners will be determined in part based on the 
number of shares (as adjusted) and price of FairPoint common stock on 
the date of the closing of the merger. This value is now expected to be 
less than $2,715 million because (a) FairPoint expects to issue approxi-
mately 54 million shares of common stock in the merger and the price 
of FairPoint common stock has declined since the announcement of the 
merger (the closing price of FairPoint common stock on the last business 
day prior to the announcement of the merger was $18.54 per share) and 
(b) in connection with the regulatory approval process, Verizon currently 
expects to make additional contributions of approximately $320 million 
to the entity that will merge with FairPoint.

Environmental Matters
During  2003,  under  a  government-approved  plan,  remediation  com-
menced at the site of a former Sylvania facility in Hicksville, New York 
that	processed	nuclear	fuel	rods	in	the	1950s	and	1960s.	Remediation	
beyond original expectations proved to be necessary and a reassessment 
of the anticipated remediation costs was conducted. A reassessment of 
costs related to remediation efforts at several other former facilities was 
also undertaken. In September 2005, the Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) 
accepted	 the	 Hicksville	 site	 into	 the	 Formerly	 Utilized	 Sites	 Remedial	
Action Program. This may result in the ACE performing some or all of the 
remediation effort for the Hicksville site with a corresponding decrease 
in costs to Verizon. To the extent that the ACE assumes responsibility for 
remedial work at the Hicksville site, an adjustment to a reserve previously 
established for the remediation may be made. Adjustments may also be 
made based upon actual conditions discovered during the remediation 
at any of the sites requiring remediation.

New York Recovery Funding 
In August 2002, President Bush signed the Supplemental Appropriations 
bill that included $5.5 billion in New York recovery funding. Of that amount, 
approximately $750 million was allocated to cover utility restoration and 
infrastructure rebuilding as a result of the September 11th terrorist attacks 
on lower Manhattan. These funds will be distributed through the Lower 
Manhattan Development Corporation following an application and audit 
process. As of September 2004, we had applied for reimbursement of 
approximately $266 million under Category One and in 2004 and 2005 
we applied for reimbursement of an additional $139 million of Category 
Two losses. Category One funding relates to Emergency and Temporary 
Service	Response	while	Category	Two	funding	is	for	permanent	restora-
tion and infrastructure improvement. According to the plan, permanent 
restoration is reimbursed up to 75% of the loss. On November 3, 2005, we 
received the results of preliminary audit findings disallowing all but $49.9 
million of our $266 million of Category One application. On December 8, 

33

Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

2005, we provided a detailed rebuttal to the preliminary audit findings. 
We received a copy of the final audit report for Verizon’s Category One 
applications largely confirming the preliminary audit findings and, on 
January 4, 2007, we filed an appeal. That appeal, as well as our Category 
Two applications, are pending.

Regulatory and Competitive Trends

Competition and Regulation 
Technological,  regulatory  and  market  changes  have  provided Verizon 
both new opportunities and challenges. These changes have allowed 
Verizon  to  offer  new  types  of  services  in  an  increasingly  competitive 
market.  At  the  same  time,  they  have  allowed  other  service  providers 
to broaden the scope of their own competitive offerings. Current and 
potential  competitors  for  network  services  include  other  telephone 
companies, cable companies, wireless service providers, foreign telecom-
munications providers, satellite providers, electric utilities, Internet service 
providers, providers of VoIP services, and other companies that offer net-
work services using a variety of technologies. Many of these companies 
have a strong market presence, brand recognition and existing customer 
relationships, all of which contribute to intensifying competition and may 
affect our future revenue growth. Many of our competitors also remain 
subject to fewer regulatory constraints than Verizon.

We  are  unable  to  predict  definitively  the  impact  that  the  ongoing 
changes in the telecommunications industry will ultimately have on our 
business, results of operations or financial condition. The financial impact 
will depend on several factors, including the timing, extent and success 
of competition in our markets, the timing and outcome of various regula-
tory proceedings and any appeals, and the timing, extent and success of 
our pursuit of new opportunities.

FCC Regulation
The  FCC  has  jurisdiction  over  our  interstate  telecommunications  ser-
vices  and  other  matters  for  which  the  FCC  has  jurisdiction  under  the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Communications Act). The 
Communications Act generally provides that we may not charge unjust 
or unreasonable rates, or engage in unreasonable discrimination when 
we are providing services as a common carrier, and regulates some of the 
rates, terms and conditions under which we provide certain services. The 
FCC also has adopted regulations governing various aspects of our busi-
ness including: (i) use and disclosure of customer proprietary network 
information; (ii) telemarketing; (iii) assignment of telephone numbers to 
customers; (iv) provision to law enforcement agencies of the capability to 
obtain call identifying information and call content information from calls 
pursuant to lawful process; (v) accessibility of services and equipment to 
individuals with disabilities if readily achievable; (vi) interconnection with 
the	networks	of	other	carriers;	(vii)	customers’	ability	to	keep	(or	“port”)	
their telephone numbers when switching to another carrier; and (viii) 
availability of back-up power. In addition, we pay various fees to support 
other FCC programs, such as the universal service program discussed 
below. Changes to these mandates, or the adoption of additional man-
dates, could require us to make changes to our operations or otherwise 
increase our costs of compliance.

Broadband
The FCC has adopted a series of orders that recognize the competitive 
nature of the broadband market and impose lesser regulatory require-
ments on broadband services and facilities than apply to narrowband 
or traditional telephone services. With respect to facilities, the FCC has 
determined that certain unbundling requirements that apply to narrow-
band facilities do not apply to broadband facilities such as fiber to the 
premise loops and packet switches. With respect to services, the FCC has 

34

concluded that broadband Internet access services offered by telephone 
companies and their affiliates qualify as largely deregulated information 
services. The same order also concluded that telephone companies may 
offer the underlying broadband transmission services that are used as an 
input to Internet access services through private carriage arrangements 
on negotiated commercial terms. The order was upheld on appeal. In 
addition,  a Verizon  petition  asking  the  FCC  to  forbear  from  applying 
common carrier regulation to certain broadband services sold primarily 
to  larger  business  customers  when  those  services  are  not  used  for 
Internet access was deemed granted by operation of law on March 19, 
2006 when the FCC did not deny the petition by the statutory deadline. 
The relief obtained through the forbearance petition has been upheld on 
appeal, but remains under challenge.

Video
The FCC has a body of rules that apply to cable operators under Title VI 
of the Communications Act of 1934, and these rules also generally apply 
to telephone companies that provide cable services over their networks. 
In addition, companies that provide cable service over a cable system 
generally must obtain a local cable franchise. On March 5, 2007, the FCC 
released an order setting forth parameters consistent with Section 621 
of the Communications Act of 1934 and other federal law, on the timing 
and scope of franchise negotiations by local franchising authorities. The 
FCC found that some prior practices in the local franchise approval pro-
cess constituted an unreasonable refusal to award a competitive local 
franchise under the requirements of federal law. This order is the subject 
of a pending appeal.

Interstate Access Charges and Intercarrier Compensation
The current framework for interstate access rates was established in the 
Coalition for Affordable Local and Long Distance Services (CALLS) plan 
which the FCC adopted on May 31, 2000. The CALLS plan has three main 
components.  First,  it  establishes  portable  interstate  access  universal 
service support of $650 million for the industry that replaces implicit sup-
port previously embedded in interstate access charges. Second, the plan 
simplifies the patchwork of common line charges into one subscriber line 
charge (SLC) and provides for de-averaging of the SLC by zones and class 
of customers. Third, the plan set into place a mechanism to transition to 
a set target of $.0055 per minute for switched access services. Once that 
target rate is reached, local exchange carriers are no longer required to 
make further annual price cap reductions to their switched access prices. 
As a result of tariff adjustments which became effective in July 2003, vir-
tually all of our switched access lines reached the $.0055 benchmark.

The FCC currently is conducting a broad rulemaking proceeding to con-
sider new rules governing intercarrier compensation including, but not 
limited to, access charges, compensation for Internet traffic and recip-
rocal compensation for local traffic. The FCC has sought comments about 
intercarrier compensation in general and requested input on a number 
of specific reform proposals. The FCC also has pending before it issues 
relating to intercarrier compensation for dial-up Internet-bound traffic. 
The  FCC  previously  found  that  this  traffic  is  not  subject  to  reciprocal 
compensation under Section 251(b)(5) of the Telecommunications Act of 
1996. Instead, the FCC established federal rates per minute for this traffic 
that declined from $.0015 to $.0007 over a three-year period, established 
caps on the total minutes of this traffic subject to compensation in a state 
and required incumbent local exchange carriers to offer to both bill and 
pay reciprocal compensation for local traffic at the same rate as they are 
required to pay on Internet-bound traffic. The U.S. Court of Appeals for 
the D.C. Circuit rejected part of the FCC’s rationale, but declined to vacate 
the order while it is on remand. As a result, pending further action by the 
FCC, the FCC’s underlying order remains in effect. The FCC subsequently 
denied a petition to discontinue the $.0007 rate cap on this traffic, but 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

removed the caps on the total minutes of Internet-bound traffic subject 
to compensation. That decision has been upheld on appeal. Disputes 
also remain pending in a number of forums relating to the appropriate 
compensation for Internet-bound traffic during previous periods under 
the terms of our interconnection agreements with other carriers.

The FCC also is conducting a rulemaking proceeding to address the regu-
lation of services that use Internet protocol. One of the issues raised in the 
rulemaking as well as in several petitions currently pending before the 
FCC addresses whether, and under what circumstances, access charges 
should apply to voice or other Internet protocol services. The FCC previ-
ously has held that one provider’s peer-to-peer Internet protocol service 
that does not use the public switched network is an interstate information 
service and is not subject to access charges, while a service that utilizes 
Internet protocol for only one intermediate part of a call’s transmission is 
a telecommunications service that is subject to access charges. Another 
petition asking the FCC to forbear from applying access charges to voice 
over  Internet  protocol  services  that  are  terminated  on  switched  local 
exchange networks was withdrawn by the carrier that filed that petition. 
The FCC also declared the services offered by one provider of a voice 
over Internet protocol service to be jurisdictionally interstate. The FCC 
also stated that its conclusion would apply to other services with similar 
characteristics. On March 21, 2007, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals 
affirmed the FCC’s Order.

The FCC also has adopted rules for special access services that provide for 
pricing flexibility and ultimately the removal of services from price regu-
lation when prescribed competitive thresholds are met. More than half of 
special access revenues are now removed from price regulation. The FCC 
currently has a rulemaking proceeding underway to update the public 
record concerning its pricing flexibility rules and to determine whether 
any changes to those rules are warranted.

Universal Service
The  FCC  also  has  a  body  of  rules  implementing  the  universal  service 
provisions  of  the  Telecommunications  Act  of  1996,  including  rules 
governing support to rural and non-rural high-cost areas, support for low 
income subscribers and support for schools, libraries and rural health care. 
The FCC’s current rules for support to high-cost areas served by larger 
“non-rural”	local	telephone	companies	were	previously	remanded	by	U.S.	
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, which had found that the FCC had 
not adequately justified these rules. The FCC has initiated a rulemaking 
proceeding in response to the court’s remand, but its rules remain in effect 
pending the results of the rulemaking. It is also considering modifications 
to the high-cost support system that could include a cap on the amount 
of support and other limits on what certain eligible carriers may receive. 
The FCC also has proceedings underway to evaluate possible changes 
to its current rules for assessing contributions to the universal service 
fund. As an interim step, in June 2006, the FCC ordered that providers of 
VoIP services are subject to federal universal service obligations. The FCC 
also increased the percentage of revenues subject to federal universal 
service obligations that wireless providers may use as a safe harbor. The 
substance of these orders was upheld on appeal in June 2007, but the 
Court did remand some more minor implementation issues back to the 
FCC. Any further change in the current assessment mechanism could 
result in a change in the contribution that local telephone companies, 
wireless carriers or others must make and that would have to be collected 
from customers.

Unbundling of Network Elements
Under Section 251 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, incumbent 
local  exchange  carriers  were  required  to  provide  competing  carriers 
with  access  to  components  of  their  network  on  an  unbundled  basis, 
known  as  UNEs,  where  certain  statutory  standards  are  satisfied. The 
Telecommunications Act of 1996 also adopted a cost-based pricing stan-
dard for these UNEs, which the FCC interpreted as allowing it to impose 
a	pricing	standard	known	as	“total	element	long	run	incremental	cost”	or	
“TELRIC.”	The	FCC’s	rules	defining	the	unbundled	network	elements	that	
must	be	made	available	at	TELRIC	prices	have	been	overturned	on	mul-
tiple occasions by the courts. In its most recent order issued in response 
to these court decisions, the FCC eliminated the requirement to unbundle 
mass market local switching on a nationwide basis, with the obligation 
to accept new orders ending as of the effective date of the order (March 
11, 2005). The FCC also established a one year transition for existing UNE 
switching  arrangements.  For  high-capacity  transmission  facilities,  the 
FCC established criteria for determining whether high-capacity loops, 
transport or dark fiber transport must be unbundled in individual wire 
centers, and stated that these standards were only expected to affect a 
small number of wire centers. The FCC also eliminated the obligation to 
provide dark fiber loops and found that there is no obligation to provide 
UNEs exclusively for wireless or long distance service. In any instance 
where a particular high-capacity facility no longer has to be made avail-
able as a UNE, the FCC established a similar one year transition for any 
existing high-capacity loop or transport UNEs, and an 18 month tran-
sition  for  any  existing  dark  fiber  UNEs. This  decision  has  been  upheld  
on appeal.

As  noted  above,  the  FCC  has  concluded  that  the  requirement  under 
Section 251 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to provide unbun-
dled	network	elements	at	TELRIC	prices	generally	does	not	apply	with	
respect to broadband facilities, such as fiber to the premises loops, the 
packet-switched capabilities of hybrid loops and packet switching. The 
FCC also has held that any separate unbundling obligations that may be 
imposed by Section 271 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 do not 
apply to these same facilities. The decision with respect to Section 271 
has been upheld on appeal and a petition for rehearing of that order 
was denied.

Wireless Services
The FCC regulates the licensing, construction, operation, acquisition and 
transfer of wireless communications systems, including the systems that 
Verizon Wireless operates, pursuant to the Communications Act, other 
legislation, and the FCC’s rules. The FCC and Congress continuously con-
sider changes to these laws and rules. Adoption of new  laws  or  rules 
may raise the cost of providing service or require modification of Verizon 
Wireless’ business plans or operations.

To  use  the  radio  frequency  spectrum,  wireless  communications  sys-
tems must be licensed by the FCC to operate the wireless network and 
mobile devices in assigned spectrum segments. Verizon Wireless holds 
FCC  licenses  to  operate  in  several  different  radio  services,  including 
the cellular radiotelephone service, personal communications service, 
advanced wireless service, and point-to-point radio service. The technical 
and service rules, the specific radio frequencies and amounts of spec-
trum we hold, and the sizes of the geographic areas we are authorized 
to operate in, vary for each of these services. However, all of the licenses 
Verizon Wireless holds allow it to use spectrum to provide a wide range 
of mobile and fixed communications services, including both voice and 
data services, and Verizon Wireless operates a seamless network that uti-
lizes those licenses to provide services to customers. Because the FCC 
issues licenses for only a fixed time, generally 10 years, Verizon Wireless 

35

Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

must periodically seek renewal of those licenses. Although the FCC has 
routinely renewed all of Verizon Wireless’ licenses that have come up for 
renewal to date, challenges could be brought against the licenses in the 
future. If a wireless license were revoked or not renewed upon expira-
tion, Verizon Wireless would not be permitted to provide services on the 
licensed spectrum in the area covered by that license.

The FCC has also imposed specific mandates on carriers that operate 
wireless communications systems, which increase Verizon Wireless’ costs. 
These  mandates  include  requirements  that Verizon Wireless:  (i)  meet 
specific  construction  and  geographic  coverage  requirements  during 
the  license  term;  (ii)  meet  technical  operating  standards  that,  among 
other things, limit the radio frequency radiation from mobile devices and 
antennas;	(iii)	deploy	“Enhanced	911”	wireless	services	that	provide	the	
wireless caller’s number, location and other information upon request by 
a state or local public safety agency that handles 911 calls; (iv) provide 
backup electric power at most cell sites in the event electric utility ser-
vice is disrupted; and (v) comply with regulations for the construction of 
transmitters and towers that, among other things, restrict siting of towers 
in environmentally sensitive locations and in places where the towers 
would	affect	a	site	listed	or	eligible	for	listing	on	the	National	Register	of	
Historic Places. Changes to these mandates could require Verizon Wireless 
to make changes to operations or increase its costs of compliance.

The Communications Act imposes restrictions on foreign ownership of 
U.S. wireless systems. The FCC has approved the interest that Vodafone 
Group Plc holds, through various of its subsidiaries, in Verizon Wireless. 
The FCC may need to approve any increase in Vodafone’s interest or the 
acquisition of an ownership interest by other foreign entities. In addition, 
as part of the FCC’s approval of Vodafone’s ownership interest, Verizon 
Wireless, Verizon  and Vodafone  entered  into  an  agreement  with  the 
U.S. Department of Defense, Department of Justice and Federal Bureau 
of  Investigation  which  imposes  national  security  and  law  enforce-
ment-related obligations on the ways in which Verizon Wireless stores 
information and otherwise conducts its business.

Verizon Wireless anticipates that it will need additional spectrum to meet 
future demand. It can meet spectrum needs by purchasing licenses or 
leasing spectrum from other licensees, or by acquiring new spectrum 
licenses from the FCC. Under the Communications Act, before Verizon 
Wireless can acquire a license from another licensee in order to expand 
its coverage or its spectrum capacity in a particular area, it must file an 
application with the FCC, and the FCC can grant the application only after 
a period for public notice and comment. This review process can delay 
acquisition of spectrum needed to expand services. The Communications 
Act also requires the FCC to award new licenses for most commercial wire-
less services through a competitive bidding process in which spectrum is 
awarded to bidders in an auction. Verizon Wireless participated in spec-
trum auctions to acquire licenses for personal communication service 
and most recently advanced wireless service. In addition, the FCC began 
conducting an auction of spectrum in the 700 MHz band on January 
24, 2008. This spectrum is currently used for UHF television operations 
but by law those operations must cease no later than February 17, 2009. 
Verizon Wireless filed an application on December 3, 2007, to qualify as 
a bidder in this auction, and on January 14, 2008, the FCC announced 
that Verizon Wireless and 213 other applicants had qualified as eligible 
to bid in the auction. The FCC determined that bidding in this auction 

will	be	“anonymous,”	which	means	that	prior	to	and	during	the	course	
of the auction(s), the FCC will not make public any information about 
a specific applicant’s upfront deposit or its bids. In addition, FCC rules 
restrict information that bidders may disclose about their participation in 
the auction. The FCC also adopted service rules that will impose costs on 
licensees that acquire the 700 MHz band spectrum, including minimum 
coverage mandates by specific dates during the license terms, and, for 
approximately	 one-third	 of	 the	 spectrum,	“open	 access”	requirements,	
which generally require licensees of that spectrum to allow customers 
to use devices and applications of their choice, subject to certain limits. 
The open access requirements are the subject of a pending appeal in 
which Verizon Wireless has intervened. The timing of future auctions, and 
the spectrum being sold, may not match Verizon Wireless’ needs, and the 
company may not be able to secure the spectrum in the amounts and/or 
in the markets it seeks through the current or any future auction.

The  FCC  is  also  conducting  several  proceedings  to  explore  making 
additional spectrum available for licensed and/or unlicensed use. These 
proceedings could increase radio interference to Verizon Wireless’ opera-
tions from other spectrum users and could impact the ways in which 
it uses spectrum, the capacity of that spectrum to carry traffic, and the 
value of that spectrum.

State Regulation and Local Approvals
Telephone Operations
State public utility commissions regulate our telephone operations with 
respect to certain telecommunications intrastate rates and services and 
other matters. Our competitive local exchange carrier and long distance 
operations are generally classified as nondominant and lightly regulated 
the  same  as  other  similarly  situated  carriers.  Our  incumbent  local 
exchange operations are generally classified as dominant. These latter 
operations predominantly are subject to alternative forms of regulation 
(AFORs)	in	the	various	states,	although	they	remain	subject	to	rate	of	
return regulation in a few states. Arizona, Illinois, Nevada, New Hampshire, 
Oregon and Washington are rate of return regulated with various levels 
of  pricing  flexibility  for  competitive  services.  California,  Connecticut, 
Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida, Indiana, Maryland, Michigan, 
Maine,  Massachusetts,  New  Jersey,  New  York,  North  Carolina,  Ohio, 
Pennsylvania,	Rhode	Island,	South	Carolina,	Texas,	Vermont,	Virginia,	West	
Virginia	 and	Wisconsin	 are	 under	 AFORs	 with	 various	 levels	 of	 pricing	
flexibility,	detariffing,	and	service	quality	standards.	None	of	the	AFORs	
include  earnings  regulation.  In  Idaho, Verizon  has  made  the  election 
under a recent statutory amendment into a deregulatory regime that 
phases out all price regulation.

Video
Companies that provide cable service over a cable system are typically 
subject to state and/or local cable television rules and regulations. As 
noted above, cable operators generally must obtain a local cable fran-
chise from each local unit of government prior to providing cable service 
in  that  local  area.  Some  states  have  recently  enacted  legislation  that 
enables cable operators to apply for, and obtain, a single cable franchise 
at the state, rather than local, level. To date, Verizon has applied for and 
received state-issued franchises in California, Indiana, Florida, New Jersey, 
Texas and the unincorporated areas of Delaware. Virginia law provides us 
the option of entering a given franchise area using state standards if local 
franchise negotiations are unsuccessful.

36

Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations continued

Wireless Services
The rapid growth of the wireless industry has led to an increase in efforts 
by some state legislatures and state public utility commissions to regu-
late the industry in ways that may impose additional costs on Verizon 
Wireless. The  Communications  Act  generally  preempts  regulation  by 
state and local governments of the entry of, or the rates charged by, wire-
less carriers. Although a state may petition the FCC to allow it to impose 
rate regulation, no state has done so. In addition, the Communications 
Act does not prohibit the states from regulating the other “terms and 
conditions”	of	 wireless	 service.	While	 numerous	 state	 commissions	 do	
not currently have jurisdiction over wireless services, state legislatures 
may decide to grant them such jurisdiction, and those commissions that 
already have authority to impose regulations on wireless carriers may 
adopt new rules.

State  efforts  to  regulate  wireless  services  have  included  proposals  to 
regulate customer billing, termination of service, trial periods for service, 
advertising, network outages, the use of handsets while driving, and the 
provision of emergency or alert services. Over the past several years, only 
a few states have imposed regulation in one or more of these areas, and 
in  2006  a  federal  appellate  court  struck  down  one  such  state  statute, 
but Verizon Wireless expects these efforts to continue. Some states also 
impose their own universal service support regimes on wireless and other 
telecommunications carriers, and other states are considering whether to 
create such regimes.

Verizon Wireless (as well as AT&T (formerly Cingular) and Sprint-Nextel) 
is	a	party	to	an	Assurance	of	Voluntary	Compliance	(“AVC”)	with	33	State	
Attorneys General. The AVC, which generally reflected Verizon Wireless’s 
practices at the time it was entered into in July 2004, obligates the com-
pany to disclose certain rates and terms during a sales transaction, to 
provide maps depicting coverage, and to comply with various require-
ments regarding advertising, billing, and other practices. 

At the state and local level, wireless facilities are subject to zoning and 
land use regulation. Under the Communications Act, neither state nor 
local governments may categorically prohibit the construction of wireless 
facilities in any community or take actions, such as indefinite moratoria, 
which have the effect of prohibiting service. Nonetheless, securing state 
and  local  government  approvals  for  new  tower  sites  has  been  and  is 
likely to continue to be a difficult, lengthy and expensive process. Finally, 
state and local governments continue to impose new or higher fees and 
taxes on wireless carriers.

CautiOnary statement COnCerning 
fOrward-lOOking  statements 

In	this	Annual	Report	on	Form	10-K	we	have	made	forward-looking	state-
ments. These statements are based on our estimates and assumptions 
and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements 
include  the  information  concerning  our  possible  or  assumed  future 
results of operations. Forward-looking statements also include those pre-
ceded	or	followed	by	the	words	“anticipates,”	“believes,”	“estimates,”	“hopes”	
or similar expressions. For those statements, we claim the protection of 
the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private 
Securities	Litigation	Reform	Act	of	1995.

The following important factors, along with those discussed elsewhere 
in	this	Annual	Report,	could	affect	future	results	and	could	cause	those	
results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking 
statements:

•	 materially adverse changes in economic and industry conditions and 
labor matters, including workforce levels and labor negotiations, and 
any resulting financial and/or operational impact, in the markets served 
by us or by companies in which we have substantial investments;

•	 material changes in available technology, including disruption of our 

suppliers’ provisioning of critical products or services;

•	 the  impact  on  our  operations  of  natural  or  man-made  disasters  and 

any resulting financial impact not covered by insurance;

•	 technology substitution;
•	 an  adverse  change  in  the  ratings  afforded  our  debt  securities  by 

nationally accredited ratings organizations;

•	 the final results of federal and state regulatory proceedings concerning 
our  provision  of  retail  and  wholesale  services  and  judicial  review  of 
those results;

•	 the effects of competition in our markets;
•	 the timing, scope and financial impact of our deployment of fiber-to-

the-premises broadband technology;

•	 the ability of Verizon Wireless to continue to obtain sufficient spectrum 

resources;

•	 changes  in  our  accounting  assumptions  that  regulatory  agencies, 
including  the  SEC,  may  require  or  that  result  from  changes  in  the 
accounting rules or their application, which could result in an impact 
on earnings;

•	 the ability to complete acquisitions and dispositions; and
•	 the extent and timing of our ability to obtain revenue enhancements 
and cost savings following our business combination with MCI, Inc.

37

Report of Management on Internal Control Over 
Financial Reporting

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting 
Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  a n d   s u b s i d i a r i e s

We, the management of Verizon Communications Inc., are responsible 
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial 
reporting of the company. Management has evaluated internal control 
over financial reporting of the company using the criteria for effective 
internal control established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework 
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway 
Commission.

Management has assessed the effectiveness of the company’s internal 
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. Based on this 
assessment, we believe that the internal control over financial reporting 
of the company is effective as of December 31, 2007. In connection with 
this assessment, there were no material weaknesses in the company’s 
internal control over financial reporting identified by management.

The company’s financial statements included in this annual report have 
been  audited  by  Ernst  &  Young  LLP,  independent  registered  public 
accounting  firm.  Ernst  & Young  LLP  has  also  provided  an  attestation 
report on the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Ivan G. Seidenberg
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Doreen A. Toben
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thomas A. Bartlett
Senior Vice President and Controller

To The Board of Directors and Shareowners of Verizon 
Communications Inc.:

We have audited Verizon Communications Inc. and subsidiaries’ (Verizon) 
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on 
criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by 
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission 
(the COSO criteria). Verizon’s management is responsible for maintaining 
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment 
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included 
in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control Over 
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the 
company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public 
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards 
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assur-
ance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting 
was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an 
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the 
risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design 
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed 
risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary 
in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable 
basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed 
to  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  the  reliability  of  financial 
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external pur-
poses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A 
company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those poli-
cies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, 
in  reasonable  detail,  accurately  and  fairly  reflect  the  transactions  and 
dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assur-
ance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of 
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting 
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being 
made only in accordance with authorizations of management and direc-
tors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding 
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or dis-
position of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the 
financial statements.

38

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting 
may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evalua-
tion of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls 
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the 
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In  our  opinion, Verizon  maintained,  in  all  material  respects,  effective 
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based 
on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public 
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated 
balance sheets of Verizon as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the 
related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and changes in 
shareowners’ investment for each of the three years in the period ended 
December 31, 2007 of Verizon and our report dated February 22, 2008 
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Ernst & Young LLP
New York, New York

February 22, 2008

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting  
Firm on Financial Statements 

To The Board of Directors and Shareowners of Verizon  
Communications Inc.:

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets  of 
Verizon Communications Inc. and subsidiaries (Verizon) as of December 
31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, 
cash flows and changes in shareowners’ investment for each of the three 
years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements 
are the responsibility of Verizon’s management. Our responsibility is to 
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public 
Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United  States).  Those  stan-
dards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable 
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material 
misstatement.  An  audit  includes  examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence 
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An 
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and signifi-
cant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall 
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a 
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, 
in  all  material  respects,  the  consolidated  financial  position  of Verizon 
at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of their 
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period 
ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted 
accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, Verizon changed its 
methods of accounting for uncertainty in income taxes and leveraged 
lease transactions effective January 1, 2007, stock-based compensation 
effective January 1, 2006 and pension and other post-retirement obliga-
tions effective December 31, 2006.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public 
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Verizon’s internal 
control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  December  31,  2007,  based  on  
criteria  established  in  Internal  Control-Integrated  Framework  issued  
by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway 
Commission  and  our  report  dated  February  22,  2008  expressed  an 
unqualified opinion thereon.

Ernst & Young LLP
New York, New York

February 22, 2008

39

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  a n d   s u b s i d i a r i e s

2007

(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
2005

2006

$ 93,469

$

88,182

$

69,518

37,547
25,967
14,377
–
77,891

15,578
585
211
(1,829)
(5,053)

9,492
(3,982)

5,510
142
(131)
–
5,521

1.90
.05
(.05)
–
1.91
2,898

1.90
.05
(.05)
–
1.90
2,902

$

$

$

$

$

35,309
24,955
14,545
–
74,809

13,373
773
395
(2,349)
(4,038)

8,154
(2,674)

5,480
759
–
(42)
6,197

1.88
.26
–
(.01)
2.13
2,912

1.88
.26
–
(.01)
2.12
2,938

$

$

$

$

$

24,409
19,443
13,615
(530)
56,937

12,581
686
311
(2,129)
(3,001)

8,448
(2,421)

6,027
1,370
–
–
7,397

2.18
.50
–
–
2.67
2,766

2.16
.49
–
–
2.65
2,817

$

$

$

$

$

Consolidated Statements of Income

Years Ended December 31,

Operating Revenues

Operating Expenses
  Cost of services and sales (exclusive of items shown below)
  Selling, general & administrative expense
  Depreciation and amortization expense
  Sales of businesses, net
Total Operating Expenses

Operating Income
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated businesses
Other income and (expense), net
Interest expense
Minority interest
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes, Discontinued Operations,
  Extraordinary Item and Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
Provision for income taxes
Income Before Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Item
  and Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
Extraordinary item, net of tax
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
Net Income 

Basic Earnings Per Common Share(1)
Income before discontinued operations, extraordinary item
  and cumulative effect of accounting change
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
Extraordinary item, net of tax
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
Net Income
Weighted-average shares outstanding (in millions)

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share(1)
Income before discontinued operations, extraordinary item
  and cumulative effect of accounting change
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
Extraordinary item, net of tax
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
Net Income
Weighted-average shares outstanding (in millions)

(1) Total per share amounts may not add due to rounding.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

40

Consolidated Balance Sheets 

At December 31,

Assets
Current assets
  Cash and cash equivalents
  Short-term investments
  Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,025 and $1,139

Inventories

  Assets held for sale
  Prepaid expenses and other
Total current assets

Plant, property and equipment
  Less accumulated depreciation

Investments in unconsolidated businesses
Wireless licenses
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net
Other assets
Total assets

Liabilities and Shareowners’ Investment
Current liabilities
  Debt maturing within one year
  Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  Liabilities related to assets held for sale
  Other
Total current liabilities

Long-term debt
Employee benefit obligations
Deferred income taxes
Other liabilities

Minority interest

Shareowners’ investment
  Series preferred stock ($.10 par value; none issued)
  Common stock ($.10 par value; 2,967,610,119 shares and 2,967,652,438 shares issued)
  Contributed capital
  Reinvested earnings
  Accumulated other comprehensive loss
  Common stock in treasury, at cost
  Deferred compensation-employee stock ownership plans and other
Total shareowners’ investment
Total liabilities and shareowners’ investment

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  a n d   s u b s i d i a r i e s

(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
2006
2007

$

1,153
2,244
11,736
1,729
–
1,836
18,698

213,994
128,700
85,294
3,372
50,796
5,245
4,988
18,566
$ 186,959

$

2,954
14,462
–
7,325
24,741

28,203
29,960
14,784
6,402

32,288

–
297
40,316
17,884
(4,506)
(3,489)
79
50,581
$ 186,959

$

$

$

$

3,219
2,434
10,891
1,514
2,592
1,888
22,538

204,109
121,753
82,356
4,868
50,959
5,655
5,140
17,288
188,804

7,715
14,320
2,154
8,091
32,280

28,646
30,779
16,270
3,957

28,337

–
297
40,124
17,324
(7,530)
(1,871)
191
48,535
188,804

41

 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 

Years Ended December 31,

Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net Income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities –
  continuing operations:

  Depreciation and amortization expense
  Sales of businesses, net
  Loss on sale of discontinued operations
  Employee retirement benefits
  Deferred income taxes
  Provision for uncollectible accounts
  Equity in earnings of unconsolidated businesses, net of dividends received
  Extraordinary item, net of tax
  Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
  Changes in current assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisition/disposition

  of businesses:

  Accounts receivable

Inventories
  Other assets
  Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  Other, net

Net cash provided by operating activities – continuing operations
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities – discontinued operations
Net cash provided by operating activities

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital expenditures (including capitalized software)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired, and investments
Proceeds from disposition of businesses 
Net change in short-term and other current investments
Other, net
Net cash used in investing activities – continuing operations
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities – discontinued operations
Net cash used in investing activities

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from long-term borrowings
Repayments of long-term borrowings and capital lease obligations
Increase (decrease) in short-term obligations, excluding current maturities
Dividends paid
Proceeds from sale of common stock
Purchase of common stock for treasury
Other, net
Net cash used in financing activities – continuing operations
Net cash used in financing activities – discontinued operations
Net cash used in financing activities

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  a n d   s u b s i d i a r i e s

2007

2006

(dollars in millions)
2005

$

5,521

$

6,197

$

7,397

14,377
–
–
1,720
408
1,047
1,986
131
–

(1,931)
(255)
(140)
(567)
4,012
26,309
(570)
25,739

(17,538)
(763)
–
169
1,267
(16,865)
757
(16,108)

3,402
(5,503)
(3,252)
(4,773)
1,274
(2,843)
(2)
(11,697)
–
(11,697)

14,545
–
541
1,923
(252)
1,034
(731)
–
42

(1,312)
8
52
(383)
1,366
23,030
1,076
24,106

(17,101)
(1,422)
–
290
811
(17,422)
1,806
(15,616)

3,983
(11,233)
7,944
(4,719)
174
(1,700)
(201)
(5,752)
(279)
(6,031)

(2,066)
3,219
1,153

$

2,459
760
3,219

$

$

13,615
(530)
–
1,695
(1,093)
1,076
1,649
–
–

(788)
(236)
(176)
(899)
(1,266)
20,444
1,581
22,025

(14,964)
(4,684)
1,326
(346)
532
(18,136)
(356)
(18,492)

1,487
(3,825)
2,098
(4,427)
37
(271)
(57)
(4,958)
(76)
(5,034)

(1,501)
2,261
760

42

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareowners’ Investment 

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  a n d   s u b s i d i a r i e s

Years Ended December 31,

Common Stock
Balance at beginning of year
Shares issued-MCI/Price acquisitions
Balance at end of year

Contributed Capital
Balance at beginning of year
Shares issued-employee and shareowner plans 
Shares issued-MCI/Price acquisitions
Domestic print and Internet yellow pages directories
  business spin-off
Other
Balance at end of year

Reinvested Earnings
Balance at beginning of year
Adoption of tax accounting standards (See Note 1)
Adjusted balance at beginning of year
Net income
Dividends declared ($1.67, $1.62 and $1.62 per share)
Other
Balance at end of year

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Balance at beginning of year
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Unrealized gains on net investment hedges
Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges
Defined benefit pension and postretirement plans
Minimum pension liability adjustment
Other
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Adoption of pension and postretirement benefit
  accounting standard (See Note 15)
Balance at end of year

Treasury Stock
Balance at beginning of year
Shares purchased
Shares distributed
  Employee plans
  Shareowner plans
Balance at end of year

Deferred Compensation–ESOPs and Other
Balance at beginning of year
Amortization
Other
Balance at end of year
Total Shareowners’ Investment

Comprehensive Income
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss) per above
Total Comprehensive Income 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Shares

2007
Amount

(dollars in millions, except per share amounts, and shares in thousands)
2005
Amount

2006
Amount

Shares

Shares

2,967,652
 (42)
2,967,610

$

297
–
297

2,774,865
192,787
2,967,652

$

277
20
297

2,774,865
–
2,774,865

$

277
–
277

40,124
58
–

–
134
40,316

17,324
(134)
17,190
5,521
(4,830)
3
17,884

(7,530)
838
–
(4)
1
1,948
–
241
3,024

–
(4,506)

(1,871)
(2,843)

1,224
1
(3,489)

191
(112)
–
79
$ 50,581

$

$

5,521
3,024
8,545

(11,456)
(50,066)

5,355
20
(56,147)

25,369
(1)
6,010

8,695
51
40,124

15,905
–
15,905
6,197
(4,781)
3
17,324

(1,783)
1,196
–
54
14
–
526
(128)
1,662

(7,409)
(7,530)

(353)
(1,700)

181
1 
(1,871)

265
(74)
–
191
48,535

6,197
1,662
7,859

$

$

$

(5,213)
(7,859)

1,594
22
(11,456)

25,404
(24)
–

–
(11)
25,369

12,984
–
12,984
7,397
(4,479)
3
15,905

(1,053)
(755)
2
(21)
10
–
51
(17)
(730)

–
(1,783)

(142)
(271)

59
1
(353)

90
174
1
265
39,680

7,397
(730)
6,667

43

$

$

$

(56,147)
(68,063)

33,411
13
(90,786)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

NOTE  1

DESCRIPTION  OF BUSINESS  AND SUMMARY  OF SIGNIFICANT 
ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business
Verizon  Communications  Inc.  (Verizon  or  the  Company)  is  one  of  the 
world’s  leading  providers  of  communications  services.  We  have  two 
reportable segments, Wireline and Domestic Wireless, which we operate 
and manage as strategic business units and organize by products and 
services.  For  further  information  concerning  our  business  segments, 
see Note 17. Our Wireline segment provides communications services, 
including voice, broadband video and data, network access, nationwide 
long-distance  and  other  communications  products  and  services,  and 
also owns and operates one of the most expansive end-to-end global 
Internet Protocol (IP) networks. We continue to deploy advanced broad-
band network technology, with our fiber-to-the-premises network (FiOS) 
creating a platform with sufficient bandwidth and capabilities to meet 
customers’  current  and  future  needs.  FiOS  allows  us  to  offer  our  cus-
tomers a wide array of broadband services, including advanced data and 
video offerings. Our IP network includes over 485,000 route miles of fiber 
optic cable and provides access to over 150 countries across six conti-
nents, enabling us to provide next-generation IP network products and 
Information Technology (IT) services to medium and large businesses 
and government customers worldwide.

Verizon’s Domestic Wireless segment, operating as Verizon Wireless, pro-
vides wireless voice and data products and other value-added services 
and equipment across the United States using one of the most extensive 
and reliable wireless networks. Verizon Wireless continues to expand our 
wireless data, messaging and multi-media offerings at broadband speeds 
for both consumer and business customers.

Consolidation
The  method  of  accounting  applied  to  investments,  whether  consoli-
dated, equity or cost, involves an evaluation of all significant terms of 
the investments that explicitly grant or suggest evidence of control or 
influence over the operations of the investee. The consolidated financial 
statements include our controlled subsidiaries. Investments in businesses 
which we do not control, but have the ability to exercise significant influ-
ence over operating and financial policies, are accounted for using the 
equity  method.  Investments  in  which  we  do  not  have  the  ability  to 
exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are 
accounted for under the cost method. Equity and cost method invest-
ments are included in Investments in Unconsolidated Businesses in our 
consolidated balance sheets. Certain of our cost method investments 
are  classified  as  available-for-sale  securities  and  adjusted  to  fair  value 
pursuant to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement 
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain 
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS No. 115).

All  significant  intercompany  accounts  and  transactions  have  been 
eliminated.

We have reclassified prior year amounts to conform to the current year 
presentation.

Discontinued Operations, Assets Held for Sale, and Sales of 
Businesses and Investments
We  classify  as  discontinued  operations  for  all  periods  presented  any 
component of our business that we hold for sale or disposal that has 
operations and cash flows that are clearly distinguishable operationally 
and for financial reporting purposes from the rest of Verizon. For those 
components, Verizon has no significant continuing involvement after dis-
posal and their operations and cash flows are eliminated from Verizon’s 

44

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  a n d   s u b s i d i a r i e s

ongoing  operations.  Sales  of  significant  components  of  our  business 
not classified as discontinued operations are reported as either Sales of 
Businesses, Net, Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Businesses or Other 
Income and (Expense), Net in our consolidated statements of income.

Use of Estimates
We  prepare  our  financial  statements  using  U.S.  generally  accepted 
accounting principles (GAAP), which require management to make esti-
mates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. 
Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Examples  of  significant  estimates  include  unrealized  tax  benefits,  the 
allowance for doubtful accounts, the recoverability of plant, property and 
equipment, the recoverability of intangible assets and other long-lived 
assets, valuation allowances on tax assets and pension and postretire-
ment benefit assumptions.

Revenue Recognition
Wireline
Our Wireline segment earns revenue based upon usage of our network 
and facilities and contract fees. In general, fixed monthly fees for voice, 
video, data and certain other services are billed one month in advance 
and recognized the following month when earned. Revenue from ser-
vices that are not fixed in amount and are based on usage are recognized 
when such services are provided.

We recognize equipment revenue for services, in which we bundle the 
equipment with maintenance and monitoring services, when the equip-
ment is installed in accordance with contractual specifications and ready 
for the customer’s use. The maintenance  and monitoring  services  are 
recognized  monthly  over  the  term  of  the  contract  as  we  provide  the 
services. Long-term contracts are accounted for using the percentage 
of completion method. We use the completed contract method if we 
cannot estimate the costs with a reasonable degree of reliability.

Customer  activation  fees,  along  with  the  related  costs  up  to  but  not 
exceeding the activation fees, are deferred and amortized over the cus-
tomer relationship period.

Domestic Wireless
Our Domestic Wireless segment earns revenue by providing access to 
and usage of our network, which includes roaming revenue. In general, 
access revenue is billed one month in advance and recognized when 
earned. Access revenue, usage revenue and roaming revenue are rec-
ognized when service is rendered. Equipment sales revenue associated 
with the sale of wireless handsets and accessories is recognized when the 
products are delivered to and accepted by the customer, as this is consid-
ered to be a separate earnings process from the sale of wireless services. 
Customer activation fees are considered additional consideration when 
handsets are sold to customers at a discount and are recorded as equip-
ment sales revenue at the time of customer acceptance.

Maintenance and Repairs
We charge the cost of maintenance and repairs, including the cost of 
replacing minor items not constituting substantial betterments, princi-
pally to Cost of Services and Sales as these costs are incurred.

Advertising Costs
Advertising costs for advertising products and services as well as other 
promotional  and  sponsorship  costs  are  charged  to  Selling,  General  & 
Administrative expense in the periods in which they are incurred.

Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share are based on the weighted-average 
number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per 
common share include the dilutive effect of shares issuable under our 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

stock-based compensation plans, an exchangeable equity interest and 
zero-coupon convertible notes (see Note 13). As of December 31, 2006, 
the  exchangeable  equity  interest  and  zero-coupon  convertible  notes 
were no longer outstanding.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of 90 days or 
less when purchased to be cash equivalents, except cash equivalents 
held  as  short-term  investments.  Cash  equivalents  are  stated  at  cost, 
which approximates market value.

Short-Term Investments
Our short-term investments consist primarily of cash equivalents held in 
trust to pay for certain employee benefits. Short-term investments are 
stated at cost, which approximates market value.

Marketable Securities
Marketable securities are included in the accompanying consolidated 
balance sheets in Investments in Unconsolidated Businesses or Other 
Assets. We continually evaluate our investments in marketable securi-
ties for impairment due to declines in market value considered to be 
other than temporary. That evaluation includes, in addition to persistent, 
declining stock prices, general economic and company-specific evalu-
ations. In the event of a determination that a decline in market value is 
other than temporary, a charge to earnings is recorded for the loss, and a 
new cost basis in the investment is established.

Inventories
Inventory consists primarily of wireless equipment held for sale, which is 
carried at the lower of cost (determined principally on either an average 
cost or first-in, first-out basis) or market. We also include in inventory new 
and reusable supplies and network equipment of our local telephone 
operations, which are stated principally at average original cost, except 
that specific costs are used in the case of large individual items.

Plant and Depreciation
We record plant, property and equipment at cost. Our local telephone 
operations’ depreciation expense is principally based on the composite 
group  remaining  life  method  and  straight-line  composite  rates. This 
method provides for the recognition of the cost of the remaining net 
investment in local telephone plant, less anticipated net salvage value, 
over the remaining asset lives. This method requires the periodic revision 
of depreciation rates.

Plant, property and equipment of other wireline and wireless operations 
are generally depreciated on a straight-line basis.

The asset lives used by our operations are presented in the following 
table:

Average Useful Lives (in years)

Buildings
Central office equipment
Other network equipment
Outside communications plant
  Copper cable
  Fiber cable (including undersea cable)
  Microwave towers
  Poles and conduit
Furniture, vehicles and other

8 – 45
3 – 11
3 – 15

13 – 18
11 – 25
30
30 – 50
 1 – 20

When we replace, retire or otherwise dispose of depreciable plant used 
in our local telephone network, we deduct the carrying amount of such 
plant from the respective accounts and charge it to accumulated depre-
ciation. When the depreciable assets of our other Wireline and Domestic 

Wireless operations are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost 
and accumulated depreciation are deducted from the plant accounts, 
and any gains or losses on disposition are recognized in income.

We  capitalize  network  software  purchased  or  developed  along  with 
related plant assets. We also capitalize interest associated with the acqui-
sition or construction of network-related assets. Capitalized interest is 
reported as part of the cost of the network-related assets and as a reduc-
tion in interest expense.

In connection with our ongoing review of the estimated remaining useful 
lives of plant, property and equipment and associated depreciation rates, 
we determined that, effective January 1, 2005, the remaining useful lives 
of copper cable and certain components of central office equipment at 
our Wireline segment would be shortened by 1 to 2 years. These changes 
in asset lives were based on Verizon’s plans, and progress to date on those 
plans, to deploy fiber optic cable to homes, replacing copper cable.

Effective  January  1,  2007,  the  remaining  useful  lives  of  certain  of  the 
circuit  equipment  was  lengthened  from  8  years  to  9  years  based  on 
subsequent modifications to our fiber optic cable deployment plan. The 
remaining useful lives of buildings was also increased from 42 years to 
45 years. The reduction in depreciation resulting from these adjustments 
in 2007 was partially offset by increased depreciation resulting from the 
shortening of the lives of various types of wireless plant, property and 
equipment. While the timing and extent of current deployment plans are 
subject to modification, we believe that current estimates of reductions 
in impacted asset lives is reasonable and subject to ongoing analysis as 
deployment of fiber optic lines continues.

Computer Software Costs
We capitalize the cost of internal-use network and non-network software 
which has a useful life in excess of one year in accordance with Statement 
of  Position  (SOP)  No.  98-1,  “Accounting  for  the  Costs  of  Computer 
Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.” Subsequent additions, 
modifications or upgrades to internal-use network and non-network soft-
ware are capitalized only to the extent that they allow the software to 
perform a task it previously did not perform. Software maintenance and 
training costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Also, 
we capitalize interest associated with the development of non-network 
internal-use  software.  Capitalized  non-network  internal-use  software 
costs are amortized using the straight-line method over a period of 2 to 7 
years and are included in Other Intangible Assets, Net in our consolidated 
balance  sheets.  For  a  discussion  of  our  impairment  policy  for  capital-
ized  software  costs  under  SFAS  No.  144,  Accounting for the Impairment 
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144), see “Goodwill and Other 
Intangible Assets” below. Also, see Note 9 for additional detail of internal-
use non-network software reflected in our consolidated balance sheets.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
Goodwill  is  the  excess  of  the  acquisition  cost  of  businesses  over  the 
fair  value  of  the  identifiable  net  assets  acquired.  Impairment  testing 
for goodwill is performed annually or more frequently if indications of 
impairment exist under the provisions of SFAS No.142, Goodwill and Other 
Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142). The impairment test for goodwill uses a 
two-step approach, which is performed at the reporting unit level. We 
have determined that in our case, the reporting units are our operating 
segments since that is the lowest level at which discrete, reliable finan-
cial and cash flow information is available. Step one compares the fair 
value of the reporting unit (calculated using a market approach and a 
discounted cash flow method) to its carrying value. If the carrying value 
exceeds the fair value, there is a potential impairment and step two must 
be performed. Step two compares the carrying value of the reporting 

45

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

unit’s goodwill to its implied fair value (i.e., fair value of reporting unit 
less the fair value of the unit’s assets and liabilities, including identifiable 
intangible assets). If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair 
value, the excess is required to be recorded as an impairment.

Intangible Assets Not Subject to Amortization
A  significant  portion  of  our  intangible  assets  are  Domestic  Wireless 
licenses that provide our wireless operations with the exclusive right to 
utilize  designated  radio  frequency  spectrum  to  provide  cellular  com-
munication  services.  While  licenses  are  issued  for  only  a  fixed  time, 
generally ten years, such licenses are subject to renewal by the Federal 
Communications Commission (FCC). Renewals of licenses have occurred 
routinely and at nominal cost. Moreover, we have determined that there 
are currently no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or 
other factors that limit the useful life of our wireless licenses. As a result, 
we treat the wireless licenses as an indefinite-lived intangible asset under 
the provisions of SFAS No. 142. We reevaluate the useful life determina-
tion for wireless licenses each reporting period to determine whether 
events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life.

We  test  our  Domestic  Wireless  licenses  for  impairment  annually  or 
more frequently if indications of impairment exist. We use a direct value 
approach in  performing our annual impairment  test. The  direct  value 
approach determines fair value using estimates of future cash flows asso-
ciated specifically with the licenses. If the fair value of the aggregated 
wireless  licenses  is  less  than  the  aggregated  carrying  amount  of  the 
licenses, an impairment is recognized.

Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization
Our  intangible  assets  that  do  not  have  indefinite  lives  (primarily  cus-
tomer lists and non-network internal-use software) are amortized over 
their useful lives and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS 
No. 144, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the 
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If any indications 
were present, we would test for recoverability by comparing the carrying 
amount of the asset to the net undiscounted cash flows expected to be 
generated from the asset. If those net undiscounted cash flows do not 
exceed the carrying amount (i.e., the asset is not recoverable), we would 
perform the next step which is to determine the fair value of the asset 
and record an impairment, if any. We reevaluate the useful life determi-
nations for these intangible assets each reporting period to determine 
whether events and circumstances warrant a revision in their remaining 
useful lives.

For  information  related  to  the  carrying  amount  of  goodwill,  other 
intangibles  and  wireless  licenses  by  segment  as  well  as  the  major 
components and average useful lives of our other acquired intangible 
assets, see Note 9.

Income Taxes
Verizon and its domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income 
tax return.

Deferred  income  taxes  are  provided  for  temporary  differences  in  the 
bases between financial statement and income tax assets and liabilities. 
Deferred income taxes are recalculated annually at rates then in effect. 
We record valuation allowances to reduce our deferred tax assets to the 
amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

Effective  January  1,  2007,  we  adopted  FASB  Interpretation  No.  48, 
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48), which requires the 
use of a two-step approach for recognizing and measuring tax benefits 
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and disclosures regarding 
uncertainties in income tax positions. The first step is recognition: we 
determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be 

46

sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals 
or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. In 
evaluating whether a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not rec-
ognition threshold, we presume that the position will be examined by 
the appropriate taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant 
information. The second step is measurement: a tax position that meets 
the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine 
the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax 
position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 
50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Differences 
between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in 
the financial statements will generally result in one or more of the fol-
lowing: an increase in a liability for income taxes payable, a reduction of 
an income tax refund receivable, a reduction in a deferred tax asset, or an 
increase in a deferred tax liability.

As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recorded adjustments 
to liabilities that resulted in a net $79 million increase in the liability for 
unrecognized  tax  benefits  with  an  offsetting  reduction  to  reinvested 
earnings as of January 1, 2007. The implementation of FIN 48 also resulted 
in  adjustments  to  prior  acquisitions  accounted  for  under  purchase 
accounting, resulting in a reduction in the liability for tax contingencies 
in the amount of $635 million and corresponding reductions to goodwill 
and wireless licenses of $100 million and $535 million, respectively. The 
implementation impact included a reduction in deferred income taxes of 
approximately $3 billion, offset with a similar increase in other liabilities 
as of January 1, 2007.

FASB Staff Position FAS 13-2, Accounting for a Change or Projected Change in 
the Timing of Cash Flows Relating to Income Taxes Generated by a Leveraged 
Lease Transaction (FSP 13-2), requires that changes in the projected timing 
of income tax cash flows generated by a leveraged lease transaction be 
recognized as a gain or loss in the year in which the change occurs. We 
adopted FSP 13-2 effective January 1, 2007. The cumulative effect of ini-
tially adopting FSP 13-2 was a reduction to reinvested earnings of $55 
million, after-tax.

Stock-Based Compensation
Effective  January  1,  2006,  we  adopted  SFAS  No.  123(R),  Share-Based 
Payment (SFAS No. 123(R)) utilizing the modified prospective method. 
SFAS No. 123(R) requires the measurement of stock-based compensa-
tion expense based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant. 
Under  the  modified  prospective  method,  the  provisions  of  SFAS  No. 
123(R) apply to all awards granted or modified after the date of adoption. 
The impact to Verizon resulted from the Domestic Wireless segment, for 
which we recorded a $42 million cumulative effect of accounting change 
as of January 1, 2006, net of taxes and after minority interest, to recog-
nize the effect of initially measuring the outstanding liability for Value 
Appreciation Rights (VARs) granted to Domestic Wireless employees at 
fair value utilizing a Black-Scholes model.

Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency for all of our foreign operations is generally the 
local currency. For these foreign entities, we translate income statement 
amounts at average exchange rates for the period, and we translate assets 
and liabilities at end-of-period exchange rates. We record these translation 
adjustments in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, a separate com-
ponent of Shareowners’ Investment, in our consolidated balance sheets. 
We report exchange gains and losses on intercompany foreign currency 
transactions of a long-term nature in Accumulated Other Comprehensive 
Loss. Other exchange gains and losses are reported in income.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

Employee Benefit Plans
Pension and postretirement health care and life insurance benefits earned 
during the year as well as interest on projected benefit obligations are 
accrued currently. Prior service costs and credits resulting from changes 
in plan benefits are amortized over the average remaining service period 
of the employees expected to receive benefits. Expected return on plan 
assets is determined by applying the return on assets assumption to the 
market-related value of assets.

As  of  July  1,  2006,  Verizon  management  employees  no  longer  earn 
pension benefits or earn service towards the company retiree medical 
subsidy (see Note 15).

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting 
for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment 
of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)  (SFAS  No.  158).  Effective 
December 31, 2006, SFAS No. 158 requires the recognition of a defined 
benefit postretirement plan’s funded status as either an asset or liability 
on the balance sheet. SFAS No. 158 also requires the immediate recog-
nition of the unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and prior service 
costs and credits that arise during the period as a component of other 
accumulated comprehensive income, net of applicable income taxes. 
Additionally, the fair value of plan assets must be determined as of the 
Company’s  year-end.  We  adopted  SFAS  No.  158  effective  December 
31, 2006, which resulted in a net decrease to shareowners’ investment 
of $7,409 million. This included a net increase in pension obligations of 
$2,007 million, an increase in Other Postretirement Benefits Obligations 
of $10,828 million and an increase in Other Employee Benefit Obligations 
of $31 million, offset by an increase in deferred taxes of $5,457 million.

Derivative Instruments
We have entered into derivative transactions to manage our exposure to 
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and com-
modity prices. We employ risk management strategies using a variety 
of  derivatives  including  foreign  currency  forwards  and  collars,  equity 
options, interest rate and commodity swap agreements and interest rate 
locks. We do not hold derivatives for trading purposes.

In accordance with SFAS No. 133,  Accounting for Derivative Instruments 
and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133) and related amendments and inter-
pretations, we measure all derivatives, including derivatives embedded 
in other financial instruments, at fair value and recognize them as either 
assets or liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair 
values of derivative instruments not qualifying as hedges or any ineffec-
tive portion of hedges are recognized in earnings in the current period. 
Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments used effectively as fair 
value hedges are recognized in earnings, along with changes in the fair 
value of the hedged item. Changes in the fair value of the effective por-
tions of cash flow hedges are reported in other comprehensive income 
(loss) and recognized in earnings when the hedged item is recognized 
in earnings.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations 
(Revised), (SFAS No. 141(R)), to replace SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. 
SFAS No. 141(R) requires the use of the acquisition method of accounting, 
defines the acquirer, establishes the acquisition date and broadens the 
scope to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains 
control over one or more other businesses. This statement is effective 
for business combinations or transactions entered into for fiscal years 
beginning  on  or  after  December  15,  2008. We  are  still  evaluating  the 
impact of SFAS No. 141(R), however, the adoption of this statement is not 
expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results  
of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests 
in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51, (SFAS 
No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards 
for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the retained interest 
and gain or loss when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. This statement is 
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning on or 
after December 15, 2008. Upon the initial adoption of this statement we 
will change the classification and presentation of Noncontrolling Interest 
in  our  financial  statements,  which  we  currently  refer  to  as  minority 
interest. We are still evaluating the impact SFAS No. 160 will have, but 
we do not expect a material impact on our financial position or results  
of operations.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for 
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of SFAS 
115 (SFAS No. 159), which permits but does not require us to measure 
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Unrealized gains 
and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are 
reported in earnings. This statement is effective for financial statements 
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. As we will not 
elect to fair value any of our financial instruments under the provisions of 
SFAS No.159, the adoption of this statement effective January 1, 2008 will 
not have any impact on our financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements 
(SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework 
for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and 
establishes a hierarchy that categorizes and prioritizes the sources to be 
used to estimate fair value. SFAS No. 157 also expands financial state-
ment disclosures about fair value measurements. On February 12, 2008, 
the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 157-2 which delays the effective 
date of SFAS No. 157 for one year, for all nonfinancial assets and non-
financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair 
value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). 
SFAS No. 157 and FSP 157-2 are effective for financial statements issued 
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We will elect a partial 
deferral of SFAS No. 157 under the provisions of FSP 157-2 related to the 
measurement of fair value used when evaluating goodwill, other intan-
gible assets, wireless licenses and other long-lived assets for impairment 
and valuing asset retirement obligations and liabilities for exit or disposal 
activities. The impact of partially adopting SFAS No. 157 effective January 
1, 2008 will not be material to our financial statements.

In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus 
on  EITF  No.  06-3,  How  Taxes  Collected  from  Customers  and  Remitted  to 
Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (EITF 
No. 06-3). EITF No. 06-3 permits that such taxes may be presented on 
either a gross basis or a net basis as long as that presentation is used 
consistently. The adoption of EITF No. 06-3 on January 1, 2007 did not 
impact our financial statements. We present the taxes within the scope 
of EITF No. 06-3 on a net basis.

47

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

NOTE  2

DISCONTINUED  OPERATIONS , ExTRAORDINARY ITEM  AND 
OThER  DISPOSITIONS

Discontinued Operations
Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc.
On  March  30,  2007,  we  completed  the  sale  of  our  52%  interest  in 
Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc. (TELPRI) and received gross pro-
ceeds of approximately $980 million. The sale resulted in a pretax gain of 
$120 million ($70 million after-tax). Verizon contributed $100 million ($65 
million after-tax) of the proceeds to the Verizon Foundation.

Verizon Dominicana C. por A.
On December 1, 2006, we closed the sale of Verizon Dominicana C. por 
A  (Verizon  Dominicana). The  transaction  resulted  in  net  pretax  cash 
proceeds of $2,042 million, net of a purchase price adjustment of $373 
million. The U.S. taxes that became payable and were recognized at the 
time the transaction closed exceeded the $30 million pretax gain on the 
sale resulting in an overall after-tax loss of $541 million.

Verizon Information Services
In October, 2006, we announced our intention to spin-off our domestic 
print and Internet yellow pages directories publishing operations, which 
have  been  organized  into  a  newly  formed  company  known  as  Idearc 
Inc. On October 18, 2006, the Verizon Board of Directors declared a divi-
dend consisting of 1 share of the newly formed company for each 20 
shares of Verizon owned. In making its determination to effect the spin-
off, Verizon’s Board of Directors considered, among other things, that the 
spin-off may allow each company to separately focus on its core busi-
ness, which may facilitate the potential expansion and growth of Verizon 
and the newly formed company, and allow each company to determine 
its own capital structure.

On November 17, 2006, we completed the spin-off of our domestic print 
and Internet yellow pages directories business. Cash was paid for frac-
tional  shares. The  distribution  of  common  stock  of  the  newly  formed 
company to our shareowners was considered a tax free transaction for 
us and for our shareowners, except for the cash payments for fractional 
shares which were generally taxable.

At the time of the spin-off, the exercise price and number of shares of 
Verizon common stock underlying options to purchase shares of Verizon 
common stock, restricted stock units (RSU’s) and performance stock units 
(PSU’s) were adjusted pursuant to the terms of the applicable Verizon 
equity incentive plans, taking into account the change in the value of 
Verizon common stock as a result of the spin-off.

In connection with the spin-off, Verizon received approximately $2 bil-
lion in cash from the proceeds of loans under a term loan facility of the 
newly formed company and transferred to the newly formed company 
debt  obligations  in  the  aggregate  principal  amount  of  approximately 
$7.1 billion thereby reducing Verizon’s outstanding debt at that time. We 
incurred pretax charges of approximately $117 million ($101 million after-
tax), including debt retirement costs, costs associated with accumulated 
vested benefits of employees of the newly formed company, investment 
banking fees and other transaction costs related to the spin-off, which 
are included in discontinued operations.

In  accordance  with  SFAS  No.  144  we  have  classified  TELPRI,  Verizon 
Dominicana  and  our  former  domestic  print  and  Internet  yellow  page 
directories publishing operations as discontinued operations in the con-
solidated financial statements for all periods presented through the date 
of the spin-off or divestiture.

48

The assets and liabilities of TELPRI are disclosed as current assets held for 
sale and current liabilities related to assets held for sale in the consoli-
dated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006. Additional details related 
to those assets and liabilities were as follows:

At December 31,

Current assets
Plant, property and equipment, net
Other non-current assets
  Total assets

Current liabilities
Long-term debt
Other non-current liabilities
  Total liabilities

(dollars in millions)
2006

 $

 $

 $

 $

303
1,436
853
2,592

181
575
1,398
2,154

Related to the assets and liabilities above was $241 million included as 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss in the consolidated balance 
sheet as of December 31, 2006.

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax, presented in the con-
solidated statements of income included the following:

Year Ended December 31,

Operating revenues

Income before provision for income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Income from discontinued operations,
  net of tax

2007

306

185
 (43)

142

$

$

$

$

$

$

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

5,077

2,041
(1,282)

$

$

5,595

2,159
(789) 

759

$

1,370

Extraordinary Item
Compañía Anónima Nacional Teléfonos de Venezuela (CANTV)
In  January  2007,  the  Bolivarian  Republic  of Venezuela  (the  Republic) 
declared its intent to nationalize certain companies, including CANTV. On 
February 12, 2007, we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding 
(MOU) with the Republic, which provided that the Republic offer to pur-
chase all of the equity securities of CANTV, including our 28.5% interest, 
through public tender offers in Venezuela and the United States. Under 
the terms of the MOU, the prices in the tender offers would be adjusted 
downward  to  reflect  any  dividends  declared  and  paid  subsequent  to 
February 12, 2007. During the second quarter of 2007, the tender offers 
were completed and Verizon received an aggregate amount of approxi-
mately $572 million, which included $476 million from the tender offers 
as well as $96 million of dividends declared and paid subsequent to the 
MOU. Based upon our investment balance in CANTV, we recorded an 
extraordinary loss of $131 million, including taxes of $38 million.

Other Dispositions
Telephone Access Lines Spin-off
On January 16, 2007, we announced a definitive agreement with FairPoint 
Communications, Inc. (FairPoint) that will result in Verizon establishing 
a  separate  entity  for  its  local  exchange  and  related  business  assets  in 
Maine, New hampshire and Vermont, spinning off that new entity into 
a newly formed company, known as Northern New England Spinco Inc. 
(Spinco), to Verizon’s shareowners, and immediately merging it with and 
into  FairPoint. These  local  exchange  and  business  assets  are  included 
in Verizon’s  continuing  operations.  It  is  anticipated  that  as  long  as  all 
conditions are satisfied and assuming completion of the related financing 
transactions, both the spin-off of Spinco to Verizon shareowners and the 
merger of Spinco with FairPoint will occur on March 31, 2008. Verizon’s 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

Board of Directors established a record date of March 7, 2008, and a closing 
date of March 31, 2008, for the proposed spin-off of shares of Spinco to 
Verizon shareowners.

NOTE  3

OThER  ITEMS

Other Tax Matters
During 2005, we recorded tax benefits of $336 million in connection with 
the utilization of prior year loss carry forwards. As a result of the capital 
gain  realized  in  2005  in  connection  with  the  sale  of  our hawaii  busi-
nesses, we recorded a tax benefit of $242 million related to the capital 
losses incurred in previous years.

Also during 2005, we recorded a net tax provision of $206 million related 
to  the  repatriation  of  foreign  earnings  under  the  provisions  of  the 
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, for two of our foreign investments.

Facility and Employee-Related Items
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we recorded a charge of $772 million 
($477 million after-tax) primarily in connection with workforce reductions 
of 9,000 employees and related charges, 4,000 of whom were terminated 
in the fourth quarter of 2007 with the remaining reductions expected to 
occur throughout 2008 (see Note 15). In addition, we adjusted our actu-
arial assumptions for severance to align with future expectations.

During 2006, we recorded net pretax severance, pension and benefits 
charges of $425 million ($258 million after-tax). These charges included 
net pretax pension settlement losses of $56 million ($26 million after-
tax) related to employees that received lump-sum distributions primarily 
resulting  from  our  separation  plans. These  charges  were  recorded  in 
accordance with SFAS No. 88, Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and 
Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination (SFAS No. 
88), which requires that settlement losses be recorded once prescribed 
payment thresholds have been reached. Also included are pretax charges 
of $369 million ($228 million after-tax) for employee severance and sev-
erance-related costs in connection with the involuntary separation of 
approximately 4,100 employees. In addition, during 2005 we recorded 
a charge of $59 million ($36 million after-tax) associated with employee 
severance costs and severance-related activities in connection with a vol-
untary separation program for surplus union-represented employees.

During 2006, we recorded pretax charges of $184 million ($118 million 
after-tax) in connection with the continued relocation of employees and 
business  operations  to Verizon  Center  located  in  Basking  Ridge,  New 
Jersey. During 2005, we recorded a net pretax gain of $18 million ($8 mil-
lion after-tax) in connection with this relocation, including a pretax gain 
of $120 million ($72 million after-tax) related to the sale of a New York City 
office building, partially offset by a pretax charge of $102 million ($64 mil-
lion after-tax) primarily associated with relocation, employee severance 
and related activities.

During  2007,  we  recorded  pretax  charges  of  $84  million  ($80  million 
after-tax) for costs incurred related to certain network and work center 
re-arrangements, the isolation and extraction of related business informa-
tion, and other activities to separate the wireline facilities and operations 
in Maine, New hampshire and Vermont from Verizon at the closing of the 
transaction, as well as professional advisory and legal fees in connection 
with this transaction.

Upon the closing of the transaction, Verizon shareowners will own approx-
imately 60 percent of the new company, and FairPoint shareowners will 
own approximately 40 percent. Verizon Communications will not receive 
any shares in FairPoint as a result of the transaction. In connection with 
the merger, Verizon shareowners will receive one share of FairPoint stock 
for approximately every 53 shares of Verizon stock held as of the record 
date. The proposal relating to the merger was approved by the FairPoint 
shareowners in August 2007. Both the spin-off and merger are expected 
to qualify as tax-free transactions, except to the extent that cash is paid to 
Verizon shareowners in lieu of fractional shares.

Based upon the number of shares (as adjusted) and price of FairPoint 
common  stock  (NYSE:  FRP)  on  the  date  of  the  announcement  of  the 
merger, the estimated total value to be received by Verizon and its shar-
eowners  in  exchange  for  these  operations  was  approximately  $2,715 
million. This  consisted  of  (a)  approximately  $1,015  million  of  FairPoint 
common stock that was to be received by Verizon shareowners in the 
merger, and (b) $1,700 million in value that was to be received by Verizon 
through a combination of cash distributions to Verizon and debt securi-
ties issued to Verizon prior to the spin-off. Verizon currently intends to 
exchange these newly issued debt securities for certain debt that was 
previously issued by Verizon, which would have the effect of reducing 
Verizon’s then-outstanding debt. The actual total value to be received 
by Verizon and its shareowners will be determined in part based on the 
number of shares (as adjusted) and price of FairPoint common stock on 
the date of the closing of the merger. This value is now expected to be 
less than $2,715 million because (a) FairPoint expects to issue approxi-
mately 54 million shares of common stock in the merger and the price 
of FairPoint common stock has declined since the announcement of the 
merger (the closing price of FairPoint common stock on the last business 
day prior to the announcement of the merger was $18.54 per share) and 
(b) in connection with the regulatory approval process, Verizon currently 
expects to make additional contributions of approximately $320 million 
to the entity that will merge with FairPoint.

Verizon Hawaii Inc.
During 2005, we sold our wireline and directory businesses in  hawaii, 
including Verizon  hawaii  Inc.  which  operated  approximately  700,000 
switched access lines, as well as the services and assets of Verizon Long 
Distance, Verizon Online, Verizon Information Services and Verizon Select 
Services Inc. in hawaii, to an affiliate of The Carlyle Group for $1,326 mil-
lion in cash proceeds. In connection with this sale, we recorded a net 
pretax gain of $530 million ($336 million after-tax).

49

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

During 2005, we reported a net pretax charge of $98 million ($59 million 
after-tax) related to the restructuring of the Verizon management retire-
ment benefit plans. This pretax charge was recorded in accordance with 
SFAS No. 88, and SFAS No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for the Postretirement 
Benefits Other Than Pensions (SFAS No. 106) and included the unamortized 
cost of prior pension enhancements of $430 million, offset partially by a 
pretax curtailment gain of $332 million related to retiree medical ben-
efits. In connection with this restructuring, management employees: no 
longer earn pension benefits or earn service towards the company retiree 
medical subsidy after June, 2006; received an 18-month enhancement 
of the value of their pension and retiree medical subsidy; and receive a 
higher savings plan matching contribution.

Other Items
In 2006, we recorded pretax charges of $26 million ($16 million after-tax) 
resulting from the extinguishment of debt assumed in connection with 
the completion of the MCI merger (see Note 8).

During 2005, we recorded pretax charges of $139 million ($133 million 
after-tax)  including  a  pretax  impairment  charge  of  $125  million  per-
taining to aircraft leased to airlines involved in bankruptcy proceedings 
and a pretax charge of $14 million ($8 million after-tax) in connection 
with the early extinguishment of debt.

NOTE  4

MARkETABLE  SECURITIES  AND OThER  INVESTMENTS

We  have  investments  in  marketable  securities  which  are  considered 
“available-for-sale”  under  SFAS  No.  115. These  investments  have  been 
included in our consolidated balance sheets in Short-Term Investments, 
Investments in Unconsolidated Businesses and Other Assets.

Under SFAS No. 115, available-for-sale securities are required to be carried 
at their fair value, with unrealized gains and losses (net of income taxes) 
that are considered temporary in nature recorded in Accumulated Other 
Comprehensive Loss. The fair values of our investments in marketable 
securities are determined based on market quotations. We continually 
evaluate our investments in marketable securities for impairment due to 
declines in market value considered to be other than temporary. That 
evaluation  includes,  in  addition  to  persistent,  declining  stock  prices, 
general economic and company-specific evaluations. In the event of a 
determination that a decline in market value is other than temporary, 
a charge to earnings is recorded in Other Income and (Expense), Net in 
the consolidated statements of income for all or a portion of the unreal-
ized loss, and a new cost basis in the investment is established. As of 
December 31, 2007, no impairments were determined to exist.

The following table shows certain summarized information related to our 
investments in marketable securities:

(dollars in millions)

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

Cost

Fair
Value

At December 31, 2007
Short-term investments
Investments in unconsolidated 

businesses (Note 6)

Other assets

At December 31, 2006
Short-term investments
Investments in unconsolidated 

businesses (Note 6)

Other assets

$

497

$

21

$

286
661
$ 1,444

$

616

259
594
1,469

$

$

$

$

42
31
94

28

38
31
 97

$

$

$

–

–
–
–

–

$

518

328
692
$ 1,538

$

644

(2)
–
(2)

$

295
625
1,564

Our short-term investments are primarily bonds and mutual funds.

Certain other investments in securities that we hold are not adjusted to 
market values because those values are not readily determinable and/
or the securities are not marketable. We do, however, adjust the carrying 
values of these securities in situations where we believe declines in value 
below cost were other than temporary. The carrying values for invest-
ments not adjusted to market value were $15 million at December 31, 
2007 and $12 million at December 31, 2006.

50

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

NOTE  5

PLANT, PROPERT Y  AND EqUIPMENT

The following table displays the details of plant, property and equipment, 
which is stated at cost:

At December 31,

Land
Buildings and equipment
Network equipment
Furniture, office and data processing equipment
Work in progress
Leasehold improvements
Other

Less accumulated depreciation
Total

NOTE  6

(dollars in millions)
2006

2007

$

839
19,734
173,654
11,912
1,988
3,612
2,255
213,994
128,700
$ 85,294

$

959
19,207
163,580
12,789
2,315
3,061
2,198
204,109
121,753
$ 82,356

INVESTMENTS  IN UNCONSOLIDATED  BUSINESSES

Our  investments  in  unconsolidated  businesses  are  comprised  of  the 
following:

At December 31,

Ownership

2007
Investment

(dollars in millions)
2006
Investment

Ownership

Equity Investees
Vodafone Omnitel
CANTV 
Other
Total equity investees

Cost Investees
Total investments

in unconsolidated

  businesses

–
Various

23.1% $ 2,313
–
744
3,057

23.1% $
28.5
Various

Various

315

Various

3,624
230
744
4,598

270

$ 3,372

$

4,868

Dividends  and  repatriations  of  foreign  earnings  received  from  these 
investees amounted to $2,571 million in 2007, $42 million in 2006 and 
$2,335 million in 2005.

Equity Investees
Vodafone Omnitel
Vodafone  Omnitel  is  the  second  largest  wireless  communications 
company  in  Italy.  At  December  31,  2007  and  2006,  our  investment  in 
Vodafone Omnitel included goodwill of $1,154 million and $1,044 million, 
respectively.

In December 2007, Verizon received a net distribution from Vodafone 
Omnitel  of  approximately  $2.1  billion  and  we  anticipate  that  we  may 
receive  an  additional  distribution  from Vodafone  Omnitel  within  the 
next  twelve  months.  As  a  result,  we  recorded  $610  million  of  foreign 
and  domestic  taxes  and  expenses  specifically  relating  to  our  share  of 
Vodafone Omnitel’s distributable earnings. During 2005, we repatriated 
approximately $2.2 billion of Vodafone Omnitel’s earnings through the 
repurchase  of  issued  and  outstanding  shares  of  its  equity. Vodafone 
Omnitel’s  owners,  Verizon  and  Vodafone  Group  Plc  ( Vodafone), 
participated  on  a  pro  rata  basis;  consequently,  Verizon’s  ownership 
interest after the share repurchase remained at 23.1%.

CANTV
Verizon sold its interest in CANTV in 2007 (see Note 2).

Other Equity Investees
Verizon  has  limited  partnership  investments  in  entities  that  invest  in 
affordable  housing  projects,  for  which  Verizon  provides  funding  as  a 
limited partner and receives tax deductions and tax credits based on its 
partnership interests. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, Verizon had equity 
investments in these partnerships of $637 million and $659 million, respec-
tively. Verizon currently adjusts the carrying value of these investments for 
any losses incurred by the limited partnerships through earnings.

The remaining investments include wireless partnerships in the U.S. and 
other smaller domestic and international investments.

Cost Investees
Some of our cost investments are carried at their current market value. 
Other cost investments are carried at their original cost, except in cases 
where we have determined that a decline in the estimated market value 
of an investment is other than temporary as described in Note 4. Our cost 
investments include a variety of domestic and international investments 
primarily involved in providing communication services.

NOTE  7

MINORIT Y  INTEREST

Minority interests in equity of subsidiaries were as follows:

At December 31,

Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries:
  Wireless joint venture 
  Cellular partnerships and other 

(dollars in millions)
2006

2007

$ 31,782
506
$ 32,288

$ 27,854
483
$ 28,337

Wireless Joint Venture
The wireless joint venture was formed in April 2000 in connection with 
the combination of the U.S. wireless operations and interests of Verizon 
and Vodafone. The wireless joint venture operates as Verizon Wireless. 
Verizon owns a controlling 55% interest in Verizon Wireless and Vodafone 
owns the remaining 45%.

Under the terms of an investment agreement, Vodafone had the right 
to require Verizon Wireless to purchase up to an aggregate of $20 billion 
worth of Vodafone’s interest in Verizon Wireless at designated times (put 
windows) at its then fair market value, not to exceed $10 billion in any 
one put window. The last of these put windows opened on June 10 and 
closed on August 9 in 2007. Vodafone did not exercise its right during this 
period and no longer has any right to require the purchase of any of its 
interest in Verizon Wireless.

Cellular Partnerships and Other
In August 2002, Verizon Wireless and Price Communications Corp. (Price) 
combined Price’s wireless business with a portion of Verizon Wireless. The 
resulting  limited  partnership, Verizon Wireless  of  the  East  LP  (VZ  East), 
is controlled and managed by Verizon Wireless. In exchange for its con-
tributed  assets,  Price  received  a  limited  partnership  interest  in VZ  East 
which was exchangeable into the common stock of Verizon Wireless if 
an initial public offering of that stock occurred, or into the common stock 
of Verizon on the fourth anniversary of the asset contribution date. On 
August  15,  2006, Verizon  delivered  29.5  million  shares  of  newly-issued 
Verizon common stock to Price valued at $1,007 million in exchange for 
Price’s limited partnership interest in VZ East. As a result of acquiring Price’s 
limited partnership interest, Verizon recorded goodwill of $345 million in 
the third quarter of 2006 attributable to its Domestic Wireless segment.

51

 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

The following table summarizes the allocation of the cost of the merger 
to the assets acquired, including cash of $2,361 million, and liabilities 
assumed as of the close of the merger.

(dollars in millions)

Assets acquired
  Current assets
  Property, plant & equipment

Intangible assets subject to amortization
  Customer relationships
  Rights of way and other

  Deferred income taxes and other assets
  Goodwill
Total assets acquired

Liabilities assumed
  Current liabilities
  Long-term debt
  Deferred income taxes and other non-current liabilities
Total liabilities assumed
Purchase price

$

6,001
6,453

1,162
176
1,995
5,085
$ 20,872

$

$

6,093
6,169
1,720
13,982
6,890

The  goodwill  resulting  from  the  merger  with  MCI  is  included  in  our 
Wireline segment, which includes the operations of the former MCI. The 
customer relationships are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 
3-8 years based on whether the relationship is with a consumer or a busi-
ness customer since this correlates to the pattern in which the economic 
benefits are expected to be realized.

We recorded certain severance and severance-related costs and contract 
termination costs in connection with the merger, pursuant to EITF Issue 
No. 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business 
Combination. The following table summarizes the activity related to these 
obligations during 2007:

At December 31,
2006

(dollars in millions)
At December 31,
2007

Payments

Severance costs and contract  

termination costs 

$  376

$  (340)

$

 36

The  remaining  contract  termination  costs  at  December  31,  2007  are 
expected to be paid over the remaining contract periods through 2008.

In  2007  and  2006,  we  recorded  pretax  charges  of  $178  million  ($112 
million after-tax) and $232 million ($146 million after-tax), respectively, 
primarily  associated  with  the  MCI  acquisition  that  were  comprised  of 
advertising and other costs related to re-branding initiatives, facility exit 
costs and systems integration activities.

NOTE  8

MERGER  AND ACqUISITIONS

Completion of Merger with MCI
On January 6, 2006, after receiving the required state, federal and inter-
national regulatory approvals, Verizon completed the acquisition of 100% 
of the outstanding common stock of MCI, Inc. (MCI) for a combination 
of Verizon common shares and cash. MCI was a global communications 
company that provided Internet, data and voice communication services 
to businesses and government entities throughout the world and con-
sumers in the United States.

The merger was accounted for using the purchase method in accordance 
with SFAS No. 141, and the aggregate transaction value was $6,890 mil-
lion, consisting of $5,829 million of cash and common stock issued at 
closing, $973 million of consideration for the shares acquired from entities 
controlled by Carlos Slim helú, net of the portion of the special dividend 
paid by MCI that was treated as a return of our investment, and closing 
and other direct merger-related costs. The number of shares issued was 
based on the “Average Parent Stock Price,” as defined in the merger agree-
ment. The consolidated financial statements include the results of MCI’s 
operations from the date of the close of the merger.

Allocation of the cost of the merger
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, the cost of the merger was allocated 
to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values 
as of the close of the merger, with the amounts exceeding the fair value 
being recorded as goodwill. The process to identify and record the fair 
value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed included an analysis of 
the acquired fixed assets, including real and personal property; various 
contracts, including leases, contractual commitments, and other busi-
ness contracts; customer relationships; investments; and contingencies.

The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were deter-
mined using one or more of three valuation approaches: market, income 
and cost. The selection of a particular method for a given asset depended 
on the reliability of available data and the nature of the asset, among 
other considerations. The market approach, which indicates value for a 
subject asset based on available market pricing for comparable assets, 
was  utilized  for  certain  acquired  real  property  and  investments. The 
income approach, which indicates value for a subject asset based on the 
present value of cash flow projected to be generated by the asset, was 
used for certain intangible assets such as customer relationships, as well 
as for favorable/unfavorable contracts. Projected cash flow is discounted 
at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the 
cash flow and the time value of money. Projected cash flows for each 
asset considered multiple factors, including current revenue from existing 
customers;  distinct  analysis  of  expected  price,  volume,  and  attrition 
trends; reasonable contract renewal assumptions from the perspective of 
a marketplace participant; expected profit margins giving consideration 
to marketplace synergies; and required returns to contributory assets. The 
cost approach, which estimates value by determining the current cost of 
replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility, was used 
for the majority of personal property. The cost to replace a given asset 
reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the property, 
less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation or obsolescence, 
with specific consideration given to economic obsolescence if indicated.

52

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

Rural Cellular Corporation
In late July 2007, Verizon Wireless announced that it had entered into an 
agreement to acquire Rural Cellular Corporation (Rural Cellular), for $45 
per share in cash (or approximately $757 million). As a result of the acqui-
sition, Verizon Wireless will assume Rural Cellular’s outstanding debt. The 
total value of the transaction is approximately $2.7 billion. Rural Cellular 
has more than 700,000 customers in markets adjacent to Verizon Wireless’s 
existing customer service areas. Rural Cellular’s networks are located in 
the states of Maine, Vermont, New hampshire, New York, Massachusetts, 
Alabama, Mississippi, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, 
kansas,  Idaho, Washington,  and  Oregon.  Rural  Cellular’s  shareholders 
approved  the  transaction  on  October  4,  2007. The  acquisition,  which 
is subject to regulatory approvals, is expected to close in the first half  
of 2008.

In a related transaction, on December 3, 2007, Verizon Wireless signed a 
definitive exchange agreement with AT&T. Under the terms of the agree-
ment, Verizon Wireless will receive cellular operating markets in Madison 
and  Mason,  kY,  and  10Mhz  PCS  licenses  in  Las Vegas,  NV;  Buffalo,  NY; 
Sunbury-Shamokin and Erie, PA; and Youngstown, Oh. Verizon Wireless 
will also receive minority interests held by AT&T in three entities in which 
Verizon Wireless also holds an interest plus a cash payment. In exchange, 
Verizon Wireless  will  transfer  to  AT&T  six  cellular  operating  markets  in 
Burlington, Franklin and the northern portion of Addison, VT; Franklin, NY; 
and Okanogan and Ferry, WA; and a cellular license for the kentucky-6 
market. The operating markets Verizon Wireless is exchanging are among 
those it is to acquire from Rural Cellular. The exchange with AT&T is subject 
to regulatory approvals and is expected to close in the first half of 2008.

Other Acquisitions
In July 2007, Verizon acquired a security-services firm for $435 million, 
resulting in goodwill of $343 million and other intangible assets of $81 
million. This acquisition was made to enhance our managed information 
security services to large business and government customers world-
wide. This acquisition was integrated into the Wireline segment.

On November 29, 2006, we were granted thirteen 20Mhz licenses we 
won in an FCC auction that concluded on September 18, 2006. We paid a 
total of $2,809 million for the licenses, which cover a population of nearly 
200 million.

Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations 
assume  that  the  MCI  merger  was  completed  as  of  January  1  for  the 
periods shown below:

Years Ended December 31,

(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
2005

2006

Operating revenues
Income before discontinued operations and cumulative
  effect of accounting change
Net income 

$ 88,409

$ 85,781

5,480
6,197

6,724
8,176

Basic earnings per common share:
Income before discontinued operations and cumulative
  effect of accounting change
Net income 

Diluted earnings per common share:
Income before discontinued operations and cumulative
  effect of accounting change
Net income 

1.88
2.13

1.88
2.12

2.30
2.79

2.28
2.76

The unaudited pro forma information presents the combined operating 
results of Verizon and the former MCI, with the results prior to the acqui-
sition date adjusted to include the pro forma impact of: the elimination 
of transactions between Verizon and the former MCI; the adjustment of 
amortization of intangible assets and depreciation of fixed assets based 
on  the  purchase price allocation; the elimination  of  merger  expenses 
incurred  by  the  former  MCI;  the  elimination  of  the  loss  on  the  early 
redemption of MCI’s debt; the adjustment of interest expense reflecting 
the redemption of all of MCI’s debt and the replacement of that debt 
with $4 billion of new debt issued in February 2006 at Verizon’s weighted 
average borrowing rate; and to reflect the impact of income taxes on the 
pro forma adjustments utilizing Verizon’s statutory tax rate of 40%. The 
unaudited pro forma results for 2005 include $82 million for discontinued 
operations that were sold by MCI during the first quarter of 2005. The 
unaudited pro forma results for 2005 include approximately $300 million 
of net tax benefits resulting from tax reserve adjustments recognized by 
the former MCI primarily during the third and fourth quarters of 2005, 
including audit settlements and other activity.

The unaudited pro forma consolidated basic and diluted earnings per 
share for 2006 and 2005 are based on the consolidated basic and diluted 
weighted average shares of Verizon and the former MCI. The historical 
basic  and  diluted  weighted  average  shares  of  the  former  MCI  were 
converted for the actual number of shares issued upon the closing of 
the merger.

The unaudited pro forma results are presented for illustrative purposes 
only  and  do  not  reflect  the  realization  of  potential  cost  savings,  or 
any related integration costs. Certain cost savings may result from the 
merger; however, there can be no assurance that these cost savings will 
be achieved. Cost savings, if achieved, could result from, among other 
things, the reduction of overhead expenses, including employee levels 
and the elimination of duplicate facilities and capital expenditures. These 
pro forma results do not purport to be indicative of the results that would 
have actually been obtained if the merger occurred as of the beginning 
of each of the periods presented, nor does the pro forma data intend to 
be a projection of results that may be obtained in the future.

53

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

NOTE  9

GOODWILL  AND OThER  INTANGIBLE  ASSETS

Goodwill
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:

(dollars in millions)

 Wireline

Domestic
Wireless

Total

Balance at December 31, 2005
  Acquisitions
  Reclassifications and adjustments
Balance at December 31, 2006
  Acquisitions
  Reclassifications and adjustments
Balance at December 31, 2007

$

315
5,085
(90)
5,310
343
(753)
$ 4,900

$

$

$

$

–
345
–
345
–
–
345

$

315
5,430
(90)
5,655
343
(753)
$ 5,245

$

Reclassifications  and  adjustments  to  goodwill  include  the  impact  of 
adopting FIN 48 (see Note 1) of $100 million as of January 1, 2007, as well 
as to reflect revised estimated tax bases of acquired assets and liabilities 
during 2007 and 2006.

Other Intangible Assets
The following table displays the details of other intangible assets:

Finite-lived intangible assets:
  Customer lists (3 to 10 years)
  Non-network internal-use software (2 to 7 years)
  Other (1 to 25 years)
Total
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
  Wireless licenses

At December 31, 2007
Accumulated
Amortization

Gross 
Amount

$

$

$

1,307
8,116
215
9,638

50,796

$

$

459
4,147
44
4,650

(dollars in millions)
At December 31, 2006
Accumulated
Amortization

Gross
Amount

$

$

$

1,278
7,777
204
9,259

50,959

$

$

270
3,826
23
4,119

Reclassifications and adjustments to wireless licenses include the impact 
of adopting FIN 48 (see Note 1) of $535 million as of January 1, 2007, 
partially offset by acquisitions during 2007.

Amortization expense was $1,341 million, $1,423 million, and $1,444 mil-
lion for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively 
and is estimated to be $1,324 million in 2008, $1,116 million in 2009, $884 
million in 2010, $696 million in 2011 and $472 million in 2012. Customer 
lists and relationships of $3,313 million at Domestic Wireless became fully 
amortized during 2006. 

54

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

NOTE  10

LEASING  ARRANGEMENTS 

As Lessor 
We are the lessor in leveraged and direct financing lease agreements for commercial aircraft and power generating facilities, which comprise the 
majority of the portfolio along with telecommunications equipment, real estate property, and other equipment. These leases have remaining terms 
up to 48 years as of December 31, 2007. Minimum lease payments receivable represent unpaid rentals, less principal and interest on third-party nonre-
course debt relating to leveraged lease transactions. Since we have no general liability for this debt, which holds a senior security interest in the leased 
equipment and rentals, the related principal and interest have been offset against the minimum lease payments receivable in accordance with GAAP. 
All recourse debt is reflected in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 3 for information on lease impairment charges.

Finance lease receivables, which are included in Prepaid Expenses and Other and Other Assets in our consolidated balance sheets are comprised of 
the following:

At December 31,

Minimum lease payments receivable
Estimated residual value
Unamortized initial direct costs
Unearned income

Allowance for doubtful accounts
Finance lease receivables, net
Current
Noncurrent

Leveraged 
Leases

$ 2,959
1,434
–
(1,483)
$ 2,910

Direct 
Finance 
Leases

$

$

131
16
1
(25)
123

2007

Total

$ 3,090
1,450
1
(1,508)
3,033
(168)
$ 2,865
$
36
$ 2,829

Leveraged 
Leases

$

$

3,311
1,637
–
 (1,895)
3,053

Direct 
Finance 
Leases

$

$

128
18
–
(22)
124

(dollars in millions)
2006

Total

3,439
1,655
–
(1,917)
3,177
(175)
3,002
40
2,962

$

$
$
$

Accumulated  deferred  taxes  arising  from  leveraged  leases,  which  are 
included  in  Deferred  Income  Taxes,  amounted  to  $2,307  million  at 
December 31, 2007 and $2,674 million at December 31, 2006. 

Amortization of capital leases is included in depreciation and amortiza-
tion  expense  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  income.  Capital  lease 
amounts included in plant, property and equipment are as follows:

The following table is a summary of the components of income from 
leveraged leases:

At December 31,

Years Ended December 31,

Pretax lease income
Income tax expense/(benefit)
Investment tax credits

$

2007

78
30
4

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

$

$

96
57
4

119
(25)
4

The future minimum lease payments to be received from noncancelable 
leases, net of nonrecourse loan payments related to leveraged and direct 
financing leases for the periods shown at December 31, 2007, are as fol-
lows: 

Years

2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Thereafter
Total

(dollars in millions)
Operating
Leases

Capital
Leases

$

$

127
215
136
110
110
2,392
3,090

$

$

29
23
16
10
9
16
103

Capital leases
Accumulated amortization
Total

(dollars in millions)
2006

2007

$

$

329
(153)
176

$

$

359
(160)
199

The  aggregate  minimum  rental  commitments  under  noncancelable 
leases for the periods shown at December 31, 2007, are as follows:

Years

2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Thereafter
Total minimum rental commitments
Less interest and executory costs
Present value of minimum lease payments
Less current installments
Long-term obligation at December 31, 2007

(dollars in millions)
Operating
Leases

Capital
Leases

$

$

1,489
1,276
1,016
756
497
1,967
7,001

$

$

75
63
59
55
38
132
422
(110)
312
(46)
266

As Lessee
We lease certain facilities and equipment for use in our operations under 
both capital and operating leases. Total rent expense from continuing 
operations under operating leases amounted to $1,712 million in 2007, 
$1,608 million in 2006 and $1,458 million in 2005.

As  of  December  31,  2007,  the  total  minimum  sublease  rentals  to  be 
received in the future under noncancelable operating and capital sub-
leases were $50 million and $22 million, respectively.

55

 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

NOTE  11

DEBT

Debt Maturing Within One Year
Debt maturing within one year is as follows:

At December 31,

Long-term debt maturing within one year
Commercial paper
Total debt maturing within one year

(dollars in millions)
2006

2007

$ 2,564
390
$ 2,954

$

$

4,139
3,576
7,715

The weighted average interest rate for our commercial paper at December 
31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was 4.6% and 5.3%, respectively.

Capital expenditures (primarily acquisition and construction of network 
assets) are partially financed, pending long-term financing, through bank 
loans and the issuance of commercial paper payable within 12 months.

At December 31, 2007, we had approximately $6.2 billion of unused bank 
lines of credit (including a $6 billion three-year committed facility that 
expires in September 2009 and various other facilities totaling approxi-
mately $400 million). Certain of these lines of credit contain requirements 
for the payment of commitment fees.

Long-Term Debt
Outstanding long-term debt obligations are as follows:

At December 31,

Notes payable

Telephone subsidiaries – debentures

Capital lease obligations (average rate 6.8% and 8.0%) 

Unamortized discount, net of premium
Total long-term debt, including current maturities
Less: debt maturing within one year
Total long-term debt

Notes Payable
In April 2007, Verizon issued $750 million of 5.50% notes due 2017, $750 
million of 6.25% notes due 2037, and $500 million of floating rate notes 
due 2009 resulting in cash proceeds of $1,977 million, net of discounts 
and issuance costs.

In March 2007, Verizon issued $1,000 million of 13-month floating rate 
exchangeable notes with an original maturity of 2008. These notes are 
exchangeable periodically at the option of the note holder into similar 
notes until 2017.

In  February  2007, Verizon  utilized  a  $425  million  floating  rate  vendor 
financing facility due 2013.

In  February  2008,  we  issued  $4,000  million  of  fixed  rate  notes,  with 
varying maturities, that resulted in cash proceeds of $3,953 million, net of 
discounts and issuance costs.

56

Other subsidiaries – debentures and other

6.46  – 8.75

2008 – 2028

2,450

Employee stock ownership plan loans – NYNEx debentures

9.55

2010

Interest Rates %

Maturities

2007

(dollars in millions)
2006

4.00 – 8.23

2008  – 2037

$ 14,923

$ 14,805

4.63 – 7.00
7.15  – 7.63
7.85 – 8.75

2008  – 2033
2012  – 2032
2010  – 2031

10,580
850
1,679

11,703
1,275
1,679

2,977

92

360

(106)
32,785
(4,139)
$ 28,646

70

312

(97)
30,767
(2,564)
$ 28,203

Previously, Verizon issued $1,750 million in principal amount at matu-
rity of floating rate notes due August 15, 2007. On January 8, 2007, we 
redeemed  the  remaining  $1,580  million  principal  of  the  outstanding 
floating rate notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal 
amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest 
through  the  date  of  redemption.  The  total  payment  on  the  date  of 
redemption was approximately $1,593 million. Approximately $1,600 mil-
lion of other borrowings were redeemed during 2007.

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

Zero-Coupon Convertible Notes
The  previously  issued  $5.4  billion  zero-coupon  convertible  notes  due 
2021, which resulted in gross proceeds of approximately $3 billion, were 
redeemable at the option of the holders on May 15th in each of the years 
2004, 2006, 2011 and 2016. On May 15, 2004, $3,292 million of principal 
amount of the notes ($1,984 million after unamortized discount) were 
redeemed.  On  May  15,  2006,  we  redeemed  the  remaining  $1,375 
million  accreted  principal  of  the  remaining  outstanding  zero-coupon 
convertible principal. The total payment on the date of redemption was  
$1,377 million.

Guarantees 
Verizon  Global  Funding  had  guaranteed  the  debt  obligations  of  GTE 
Corporation (but not the debt of its subsidiary or affiliate companies) that 
were issued and outstanding prior to July 1, 2003. Verizon assumed this 
guarantee in connection with the 2006 merger of Verizon Global Funding 
into Verizon. As of December 31, 2007, $2,450 million principal amount of 
these obligations remained outstanding. 

Verizon and NYNEx Corporation are the joint and several co-obligors of 
the 20-Year 9.55% Debentures due 2010 previously issued by NYNEx on 
March 26, 1990. As of December 31, 2007, $70 million principal amount 
of this obligation remained outstanding. NYNEx and GTE no longer issue 
public debt or file SEC reports. 

Debt Covenants
We and our consolidated subsidiaries are in compliance with all of our 
debt covenants.

Maturities of Long-Term Debt
Maturities  of  long-term  debt  outstanding  at  December  31,  2007  are  
as follows:

Years

2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Thereafter

(dollars in million)

$

 2,564
2,966
2,908
2,671
4,291
15,367

Telephone and Other Subsidiary Debt
During the fourth quarter of 2007, Verizon redeemed previously guar-
anteed $480 million 7.0% debentures, Series B, issued by Verizon New 
England Inc. due 2042 at par plus accrued and unpaid interest to the 
redemption dates. During the third quarter of 2007, $150 million Verizon 
Pennsylvania  Inc.  7.375%  notes  matured  and  were  repaid.  During  the 
second quarter of 2007, $125 million Verizon New England Inc. 7.65% 
notes and the $225 million Verizon South Inc. 6.125% notes matured and 
were repaid. During the first quarter of 2007, $150 million GTE Southwest 
Inc. 6.23% notes and the $275 million Verizon California Inc. 7.65% notes 
matured and were repaid. In addition, we redeemed $500 million of GTE 
Corporation 7.90% debentures due February 1, 2027 and $300 million 
Verizon South Inc. 7.0% debentures, Series F, due 2041 at par plus accrued 
and unpaid interest to the redemption dates. During the first quarter we 
recorded pretax charges of $28 million ($18 million after-tax) in connec-
tion with the early extinguishments of debt. 

During the second quarter of 2006, we redeemed/prepaid several debt 
issuances,  including: Verizon  North  Inc.  $200  million  7.625%  Series  C 
debentures due May 15, 2026; Verizon Northwest Inc. $175 million 7.875% 
Series B debentures due June 1, 2026; Verizon South Inc. $250 million 
7.5% Series D debentures due March 15, 2026; Verizon California Inc. $25 
million 9.41% Series W first mortgage bonds due 2014; Verizon California 
Inc. $30 million 9.44% Series x first mortgage bonds due 2015; Verizon 
Northwest Inc. $3 million 9.67% Series hh first mortgage bonds due 2010 
and Contel of the South Inc. $14 million 8.159% Series GG first mortgage 
bonds due 2018. The gain/(loss) from these retirements was immaterial.

During the third quarter of 2005, we redeemed Verizon New England Inc. 
$250 million 6.875% debentures due October 1, 2023 resulting in a pretax 
charge of $10 million ($6 million after-tax) in connection with the early 
extinguishment of the debt.

Redemption of Debt Assumed in Merger
On January 17, 2006, Verizon announced offers to purchase two series 
of MCI senior notes, MCI $1,983 million aggregate principal amount of 
6.688% Senior Notes Due 2009 and MCI $1,699 million aggregate prin-
cipal  amount  of  7.735%  Senior  Notes  Due  2014,  at  101%  of  their  par 
value. Due to the change in control of MCI that occurred in connection 
with the merger with Verizon on January 6, 2006, Verizon was required 
to make this offer to noteholders within 30 days of the closing of the 
merger. Noteholders tendered $165 million of the 6.688% Senior Notes. 
Separately,  Verizon  notified  noteholders  that  MCI  was  exercising  its 
right to redeem both series of Senior Notes prior to maturity under the 
optional redemption procedures provided in the indentures. The 6.688% 
Notes  were  redeemed  on  March  1,  2006,  and  the  7.735%  Notes  were 
redeemed on February 16, 2006.

In addition, on January 20, 2006, Verizon announced an offer to repur-
chase MCI $1,983 million aggregate principal amount of 5.908% Senior 
Notes Due 2007 at 101% of their par value. On February 21, 2006, $1,804 
million of these notes were redeemed by Verizon. Verizon satisfied and 
discharged the indenture governing this series of notes shortly after the 
close of the offer for those noteholders who did not accept this offer.

We recorded pretax charges of $26 million ($16 million after-tax) during 
the first quarter of 2006 resulting from the extinguishment of the debt 
assumed in connection with the completion of this merger. 

57

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that subject us to concentrations of credit risk con-
sist primarily of temporary cash investments, short-term and long-term 
investments, trade receivables, certain notes receivable, including lease 
receivables, and derivative contracts. Our policy is to deposit our tem-
porary cash investments with major financial institutions. Counterparties 
to our derivative contracts are also major financial institutions. The finan-
cial institutions have all been accorded high ratings by primary rating 
agencies. We limit the dollar amount of contracts entered into with any 
one financial institution and monitor our counterparties’ credit ratings. 
We generally do not give or receive collateral on swap agreements due 
to our credit rating and those of our counterparties. While we may be 
exposed to credit losses due to the nonperformance of our counterpar-
ties, we consider the risk remote and do not expect the settlement of 
these transactions to have a material effect on our results of operations 
or financial condition.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The tables that follow provide additional information about our signifi-
cant financial instruments:

Financial Instrument

Valuation Method

Cash and cash equivalents and 

Carrying amounts

short-term investments

Short- and long-term debt  
(excluding capital leases)

Market quotes for similar terms  

and maturities or future cash flows  
discounted at current rates

Cost investments in unconsolidated  

businesses, derivative assets  
and liabilities and notes receivable

Future cash flows discounted at  
current rates, market quotes  
for similar instruments or other  
valuation models

At December 31,

Short- and long-term debt
Cost investments in 

2007

(dollars in millions)
2006

Carrying
Amount

Fair Value

Carrying
Amount

Fair Value

$ 30,845

$ 32,380

$ 36,000

$ 37,165

unconsolidated businesses

315

315

270

270

Short- and long-term 
derivative assets 
Short- and long-term 
derivative liabilities 

61

57

61

57

31

10

31

10

NOTE  12

FINANCIAL  INSTRUMENTS

Derivatives
The ongoing effect of SFAS No. 133 and related amendments and inter-
pretations on our consolidated financial statements will be determined 
each  period  by  several  factors,  including  the  specific  hedging  instru-
ments in place and their relationships to hedged items, as well as market 
conditions at the end of each period. 

Interest Rate Risk Management
We have entered into domestic interest rate swaps to achieve a targeted 
mix of fixed and variable rate debt, where we principally receive fixed 
rates and pay variable rates based on LIBOR. These swaps hedge against 
changes in the fair value of our debt portfolio. We record the interest rate 
swaps at fair value in our balance sheet as assets and liabilities and adjust 
debt for the change in its fair value due to changes in interest rates.

We also enter into interest rate derivatives to limit our exposure to interest 
rate changes. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133, changes 
in fair value of these cash flow hedges due to interest rate fluctuations 
are  recognized  in  Accumulated  Other  Comprehensive  Loss.  Amounts 
recorded to Other Comprehensive Income related to these interest rate 
cash flow hedges for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 
were not material. 

Net Investment Hedges
During 2007, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge 
a portion of our net investment in Vodafone Omnitel. Changes in fair 
value of these contracts due to Euro exchange rate fluctuations are rec-
ognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and partially offset 
the impact of foreign currency changes on the value of our net invest-
ment. As of December 31, 2007, Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss 
includes unrecognized losses of approximately $57 million ($37 million 
after-tax) related to these hedge contracts, which along with the unre-
alized foreign currency translation balance on the investment hedged, 
remain in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss until the investment 
is sold.

During 2005, we entered into zero cost Euro collars to hedge a portion 
of our net investment in Vodafone Omnitel. During 2005, our positions 
in the zero cost euro collars were settled. As of December 31, 2007 and 
2006, Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss includes unrecognized 
gains of $2 million in each year related to these hedge contracts, which 
along  with  the  unrealized  foreign  currency  translation  balance  of  the 
investment hedged, remain in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss 
until the investment is sold.

Other Derivatives
On May 17, 2005, we purchased 43.4 million shares of MCI common stock 
under a stock purchase agreement that contained a provision for the 
payment of an additional cash amount determined immediately prior to 
April 9, 2006 based on the market price of Verizon’s common stock. Under 
SFAS No. 133, this additional cash payment was an embedded derivative 
which we carried at fair value and was subject to changes in the market 
price  of Verizon  stock.  Since  this  derivative  did  not  qualify  for  hedge 
accounting under SFAS No. 133, changes in its fair value were recorded in 
the consolidated statements of income in Other Income and (Expense), 
Net. As of December 31, 2006, this embedded derivative expired with 
no requirement for an additional cash payment to be made under the 
stock purchase agreement. During 2006 and 2005, we recorded pretax 
income of $4 million and $57 million, respectively, in connection with this 
embedded derivative. 

58

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

NOTE  13

NOTE  14

EARNINGS  PER  ShARE  AND ShAREOWNERS ’ INVESTMENT

STOCk-BASED  COMPENSATION

Earnings Per Share
The following table is a reconciliation of the numerators and denomina-
tors used in computing earnings per common share:

Years Ended December 31,

(dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts)
2005

2007

2006

Income Before Discontinued 

Operations, Extraordinary Item and 
Cumulative Effect of Accounting 
Change

After-tax minority interest expense related 

to exchangeable equity interest

After-tax interest expense related to zero-

coupon convertible notes
Income Before Discontinued  

Operations, Extraordinary Item and 
Cumulative Effect of Accounting 
Change – after assumed conversion  
of dilutive securities

Weighted-average shares  

outstanding – basic
Effect of dilutive securities:

  Stock options
  Exchangeable equity interest
  Zero-coupon convertible notes

Weighted-average shares  
outstanding – diluted

Earnings Per Common Share from 
Income Before Discontinued 
Operations, Extraordinary Item and 
Cumulative Effect of Accounting 
Change

Basic
Diluted

$ 5,510

$

5,480

$

6,027

–

–

20

11

32

28

$ 5,510

$

5,511

$

6,087

2,898

2,912

2,766

4
–
–

1
18
7

5
29
17

2,902

2,938

2,817

$
$

1.90
1.90

$
$

1.88
1.88

$
$

2.18
2.16

Certain outstanding options to purchase  shares  were  not  included  in 
the computation of diluted earnings per common share because they 
were not dilutive, including approximately 170 million weighted-average 
shares during 2007, 228 million weighted-average shares during 2006 
and 250 million shares during 2005. 

The zero-coupon convertible notes were retired on May 15, 2006 and 
the exchangeable equity interest was converted on August 15, 2006 by 
issuing 29.5 million Verizon shares (see Notes 7 and 11).

Shareowners’ Investment
Our certificate of incorporation provides authority for the issuance of up 
to 250 million shares of Series Preferred Stock, $.10 par value, in one or 
more series, with such designations, preferences, rights, qualifications, 
limitations and restrictions as the Board of Directors may determine. 

We are authorized to issue up to 4.25 billion shares of common stock.

On February 7, 2008, the Board of Directors replaced the prior share buy 
back program with a new program for the repurchase of up to 100 mil-
lion shares of Verizon common stock through the earlier of February 28, 
2011 or when the total number of shares repurchased under the new 
buy back program aggregates to 100 million. 

During 2007, 2006 and 2005, we repurchased approximately 68 million, 
50 million and 7.9 million common shares under programs previously 
authorized by the Board of Directors.

Refer to Note 1 for a discussion of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), which 
was effective January 1, 2006. 

Verizon Communications Long Term Incentive Plan
The Verizon Communications Long Term Incentive Plan (the Plan), per-
mits the granting of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, 
restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance 
share units and other awards. The maximum number of shares for awards 
is 207 million.

Restricted Stock Units
The Plan provides for grants of restricted stock units (RSUs) that generally 
vest at the end of the third year after the grant. The RSUs are classified 
as liability awards because the RSUs will be paid in cash upon vesting. 
The RSU award liability is measured at its fair value at the end of each 
reporting period and, therefore, will fluctuate based on the performance 
of Verizon’s stock. Dividend equivalent units are also paid to participants 
at the time the RSU award is paid.

The following table summarizes Verizon’s Restricted Stock Unit activity:

(shares in thousands)

Outstanding, January 1, 2005
Granted
Cancelled/Forfeited 
Outstanding, December 31, 2005
Granted
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding, December 31, 2006 
Granted
Payments
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding, December 31, 2007

 Restricted
Stock Units 

525
6,410
(66)
6,869
9,116
(392)
15,593
6,779
(602)
(197)
  21,573

 Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

$

36.75
36.06
36.07
36.12
31.88
35.01
 33.67
37.59
36.75
34.81
34.80

Performance Share Units
The Plan also provides for grants of performance share units (PSUs) that 
generally vest at the end of the third year after the grant. The human 
Resources Committee of the Board of Directors determines the number 
of PSUs a participant earns based on Verizon’s Total Shareholder Return 
(TSR), as defined in the Plan, for a three-year performance cycle relative 
to the total shareholder returns of: the companies in the industry peer 
group (60% weight); and the companies in the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 
500  index  (40%  weight).  All  payments  are  subject  to  approval  by  the 
human Resources Committee. The PSUs are classified as liability awards 
because the PSU awards are paid in cash upon vesting. The PSU award 
liability is measured at its fair value at the end of each reporting period 
and, therefore, will fluctuate based on the price of Verizon’s stock as well 
as Verizon’s TSR relative to the peer group’s TSR and the S&P 500 TSR. 
Dividend equivalent units are also paid to participants at the time that 
the PSU award is determined and paid, and in the same proportion as 
the PSU award.

59

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

The following table summarizes Verizon’s Performance Share Unit activity: 

The following table summarizes the Value Appreciation Rights activity:

(shares in thousands)

Outstanding, January 1, 2005
Granted
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding, December 31, 2005
Granted
Payments
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding, December 31, 2006 
Granted
Payments
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding, December 31, 2007

 Performance 
Share Units

10,079
9,300
(288)
19,091
14,166
(3,607)
(1,227)
28,423
  10,371
(5,759)
(900)
  32,135

 Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

$

37.50 
36.13
36.91
36.84
32.05
38.54
37.25
34.22
37.59
36.75
36.18
34.80

(shares in thousands)

Outstanding rights, January 1, 2005
Granted
Exercised
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding rights, December 31, 2005
Exercised
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding rights, December 31, 2006  
Exercised
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding rights, December 31, 2007  

 VARs

160,661
10
(47,964)
(3,784)
108,923
(7,448)
(7,008)
94,467
(30,848)
(3,207)
60,412

 Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date 
Fair Value

$

15.63
14.85
12.27
15.17
17.12
13.00
23.25
 16.99
15.07
24.55
17.58

As of December 31, 2007, all VARs were fully vested.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense
After-tax compensation expense for stock-based compensation related 
to  RSUs,  PSUs,  and VARs  described  above  included  in  net  income  as 
reported was $750 million, $535 million and $359 million for 2007, 2006 
and 2005, respectively. 

Stock Options
The Verizon Long Term Incentive Plan provides for grants of stock options 
to employees at an option price per share of 100% of the fair market 
value of Verizon Stock on the date of grant. Each grant has a 10 year life, 
vesting equally over a three year period, starting at the date of the grant. 
We have not granted new stock options since 2004. 

The following table summarizes Verizon’s stock option activity:

(shares in thousands)

Outstanding, January 1, 2005
Exercised
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding, December 31, 2005
Exercised
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding, December 31, 2006
Exercised
Cancelled/Forfeited
Options outstanding, December 31, 2007

Options exercisable, December 31,
  2005
  2006
  2007

 Stock 
Options

280,889
(1,133)
(19,996)
259,760
(3,371)
(27,025)
  229,364
  (33,079)
  (21,422)
  174,863

244,424
225,067
174,838

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$

46.18
28.73
49.62
46.01
32.12
43.72
46.48
38.50
48.26
47.78

46.64
46.69
47.78

As of December 31, 2007, unrecognized compensation expense related 
to the unvested portion of Verizon’s RSUs and PSUs was approximately 
$439 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average 
period of approximately two years.

Verizon Wireless’s Long-Term Incentive Plan
The 2000 Verizon Wireless Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Wireless Plan) 
provides compensation opportunities to eligible employees and other 
participating affiliates of Verizon Wireless (the Partnership). The Wireless 
Plan provides rewards that are tied to the long-term performance of the 
Partnership. Under the Wireless Plan, Value Appreciation Rights (VARs) 
were granted to eligible employees. The aggregate number of VARs that 
may be issued under the Wireless Plan is approximately 343 million. 

VARs  reflect  the  change  in  the  value  of  the  Partnership,  as  defined  in 
the Wireless Plan, similar to stock options. Once VARs become vested, 
employees can exercise their VARs and receive a payment that is equal to 
the difference between the VAR price on the date of grant and the VAR 
price on the date of exercise, less applicable taxes. VARs are fully exercis-
able three years from the date of grant with a maximum term of 10 years. 
All VARs are granted at a price equal to the estimated fair value of the 
Partnership, as defined in the Wireless Plan, at the date of the grant.

With the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Partnership began estimating 
the  fair  value  of VARs  granted  using  a  Black-Scholes  option  valuation 
model. The  following  table  summarizes  the  assumptions  used  in  the 
model during 2007:

Risk-free rate
Expected term (in years)
Expected volatility
Expected dividend yield

Ranges

3.2% – 5.1%
0.9 – 3.4
18.1% – 23.4%
n/a

The  risk-free  rate  is  based  on  the  U.S. Treasury  yield  curve  in  effect  at 
the  time  of  the  measurement  date.  The  expected  term  of  the  VARs 
granted was estimated using a combination of the simplified method 
as  prescribed  in  Staff  Accounting  Bulletin  (SAB)  No.  107, “Share  Based 
Payments,” (SAB No. 107) historical experience, and management judg-
ment.  Expected  volatility  was  based  on  a  blend  of  the  historical  and 
implied volatility of publicly traded peer companies for a period equal to 
the VARs expected life, ending on the measurement date, and calculated 
on a monthly basis. 

60

 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

The following table summarizes information about Verizon’s stock options 
outstanding as of December 31, 2007:

Range of 
Exercise Prices

 Shares
(in thousands)

$

20.00 – 29.99
30.00 – 39.99
40.00 – 49.99
50.00 – 59.99
60.00 – 69.99
Total

27
20,671
76,518
77,183
464
174,863

Weighted-
Average 
Remaining Life

Stock Options Outstanding
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price

4.7 years
5.5
2.9
2.1
1.8
2.9

$

27.68
36.45
44.06
54.43
60.74
47.78

The total intrinsic value was approximately $223 million for stock options 
outstanding as of December 31, 2007. The total intrinsic value for stock 
options exercised was $147 million, $10 million and $6 million, during 
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. 

The  amount  of  cash  received  from  the  exercise  of  stock  options  was 
approximately $1,274 million, $101 million and $34 million for 2007, 2006 
and 2005, respectively. The related tax benefits were not material.

The after-tax compensation expense for stock options was not material 
in  2007,  and  was  $28  million  and  $53  million  for  2006  and  2005, 
respectively. 

NOTE  15

EMPLOYEE  BENEFITS

We maintain non-contributory defined benefit pension plans for many 
of our employees. In addition, we maintain postretirement health care 
and  life  insurance  plans  for  our  retirees  and  their  dependents,  which 
are both contributory and non-contributory and include a limit on the 
Company’s share of cost for certain recent and future retirees. We also 
sponsor defined contribution savings plans to provide opportunities for 
eligible employees to save for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. We use 
a measurement date of December 31 for our pension and postretirement 
health care and life insurance plans.

Refer to Note 1 for a discussion of the adoption of SFAS No. 158, which 
was effective December 31, 2006. 

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Pension and other postretirement benefits for many of our employees 
are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Modifications in benefits 
have been bargained from time to time, and we may also periodically 
amend the benefits in the management plans.

As of June 30, 2006, Verizon management employees no longer earned 
pension benefits or earned service towards the company retiree medical 
subsidy. In addition, new management employees hired after December 
31, 2005 are not eligible for pension benefits and managers with less than 
13.5 years of service as of June 30, 2006 are not eligible for company-sub-
sidized retiree healthcare or retiree life insurance benefits. Beginning July 
1, 2006, management employees receive an increased company match 
on their savings plan contributions.

The following tables summarize benefit costs, as well as the benefit obli-
gations, plan assets, funded status and rate assumptions associated with 
pension and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans:

Obligations and Funded Status

At December 31,

Change in Benefit 

Obligations
Beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Plan amendments
Actuarial (gain) loss, net
Benefits paid
Termination benefits
Acquisitions and  
divestitures, net

Settlements
End of year

Change in Plan Assets
Beginning of year
Actual return on plan assets
Company contributions
Benefits paid
Settlements
Acquisitions and  
divestitures, net

End of year

Funded Status
  End of year

Amounts recognized on  

the balance sheet
  Noncurrent assets
  Current liabilities
  Noncurrent liabilities
  Total

Amounts recognized in 
Accumulated Other 
Comprehensive Loss 
(Pre-tax)
  Actuarial loss, net
  Prior service cost

Total

2007

Pension
2006

(dollars in millions)
Health Care and Life
2006

2007

$ 34,159
442
1,975
–
123
(4,204)
–

$ 35,540
581
1,995
–
(282)
(2,762)
47

$ 27,330
354
1,592
–
(409)
(1,561)
–

$ 26,783
356
1,499
50
152
(1,564)
14

–
–
$ 32,495

477
(1,437)
$ 34,159

–
–
$ 27,306

40
–
$ 27,330

$ 41,509
4,591
737
(4,204)
–

$ 39,227
5,536
568
(2,762)
(1,437)

$ 4,303
352
1,048
(1,561)
–

$ 

4,275
493
1,099
(1,564)
–

26
$ 42,659

377
$ 41,509

–
$ 4,142

–
4,303

$

$ 10,164

$

7,350

 $ (23,164)

$ (23,027)

$ 13,745
(130)
(3,451)
$ 10,164

$ 12,058
–
(4,708)
7,350

$

$

–
(360)
(22,804) 
$ (23,164)

$

–
–
(23,027)
$ (23,027)

$

$

13
932
945

$

$

1,428
975
2,403

$ 6,040
3,636
$ 9,676

$

6,799
4,029
$ 10,828

Changes in benefit obligations were caused by factors including changes 
in actuarial assumptions and settlements.

The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans 
was $31,343 million and $32,724 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, 
respectively.

Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in 
excess of plan assets follows:

At December 31,

Projected benefit obligation
Accumulated benefit obligation
Fair value of plan assets

(dollars in millions)
2006

2007

$ 11,001
10,606
8,868

$ 11,495
11,072
8,288

61

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

Net Periodic Cost
The following table displays the details of net periodic pension and other 
postretirement costs:

Years Ended December 31,

Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of prior service cost
Actuarial loss, net
Net periodic benefit (income) cost
Termination benefits
Settlement loss
Curtailment (gain) loss and other, net
Subtotal
Total (income) cost

2007

442
1,975
(3,175)
43
98
(617)
–
–
–
–
(617)

$

$

2006

581
1,995
(3,173)
44
182
(371)
47
56
–
103
(268)

$

$

In  2005,  as  a  result  of  changes  in  management  retiree  benefits,  we 
recorded pretax expense of $430 million for pension curtailments and 
pretax income of $332 million for retiree medical curtailments (see Note 
3 for additional information).

Termination benefits and settlement and curtailment losses of $94 mil-
lion pertaining to the sale of hawaii operations in 2005 were recorded in 
the consolidated statements of income in Sales of Businesses, Net.

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other 
comprehensive income in 2007 are as follows: 

At December 31,

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other 

comprehensive income (Pre-tax)

Actuarial (gain), net
Reversal of amortization items:

  Prior service cost
  Actuarial loss, net

Total recognized in other comprehensive income

The estimated net loss and prior service cost for the defined benefit pen-
sion plans that will be amortized from Accumulated Other Comprehensive 
Loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are $39 million 
and $54 million, respectively. The estimated net loss and prior service cost 
for the defined benefit postretirement plans that will be amortized from 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into net periodic benefit cost 
over the next fiscal year are $268 million and $397 million, respectively.

Pension
2005

$

$

675
1,959
(3,231)
42
124
(431)
11
80
436
527
96

2007

$

354
1,592
(317)
392
316
2,337
–
–
–
–
$ 2,337

2006

356
1,499
(328)
360
290
2,177
14
–
–
14
2,191

$

$

(dollars in millions) 
Health Care and Life
2005

$

$

358
1,467
(349)
290
258
2,024
1
–
(332)
(331)
1,693

2007

Pension
2006

(dollars in millions)
Health Care and Life
2006

2007

$ (1,317)

(43)
(98)
$ (1,458)

$

$

–

–
–
–

 $

(444)

(392)
(316)
 $ (1,152)

$

$

–

–
–
–

62

 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

Additional Information
As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 158 in 2006, we no longer record an 
additional minimum pension liability. In prior years, as a result of changes 
in interest rates and changes in investment returns, an adjustment to the 
additional minimum pension liability was required for a number of plans, 
as indicated below. The adjustment in the liability was recorded as a charge 
or (credit) to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax, in shar-
eowners’ investment in the consolidated balance sheets. The Additional 
Minimum Pension Liability at December 31, 2006, was reduced by $809 
million, ($526 million after-tax) based on the final measurement just prior 
to the adoption of SFAS No. 158. The remaining $396 million, ($262 million 
after-tax), was reversed as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 158.

Years Ended December 31,

2007

2006

(dollars in millions)
2005

Increase (decrease) in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income, net of tax

$

–

$

(526)

$

(51)

Assumptions
The weighted-average assumptions used in determining benefit obliga-
tions follow:

At December 31,

Discount rate
Rate of future increases in compensation

The weighted-average assumptions used in determining net periodic 
cost follow:

Years Ended December 31,

Discount rate
Expected return on plan assets
Rate of compensation increase

2007

6.00%
8.50
4.00

2006

5.75%
8.50
4.00

In order to project the long-term target investment return for the total 
portfolio, estimates are prepared for the total return of each major asset 
class  over  the  subsequent  10-year  period,  or  longer. Those  estimates 
are based on a combination of factors including the following: current 
market interest rates and valuation levels, consensus earnings expecta-
tions, historical long-term risk premiums and value-added. To determine 
the aggregate return for the pension trust, the projected return of each 
individual asset class is then weighted according to the allocation to that 
investment area in the trust’s long-term asset allocation policy.

The assumed health Care Cost Trend Rates follow:

At December 31,

health care cost trend rate assumed  

for next year

Rate to which cost trend rate  

gradually declines

Year the rate reaches level it is assumed  

Health Care and Life
2005

2006

2007

10.00%

10.00%

10.00%

5.00

5.00

5.00

to remain thereafter

2013

2011

2010

A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend 
rate would have the following effects:

One-Percentage-Point

Effect on 2007 service and interest cost
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation as of 

December 31, 2007

(dollars in millions)
Decrease

  Increase

$

295

$

(234)

3,038

(2,512)

2007

6.50%
4.00

Pension
2005

5.75%
8.50
5.00

Pension
2006

6.00%
4.00

2007

6.00%
8.25
4.00

Health Care and Life
2006

2007

6.50%
4.00

6.00%
4.00

Health Care and Life
2005

2006

5.75%
8.25
4.00

5.75%
7.75
4.00

63

 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

Plan Assets
Pension Plans
The weighted-average asset allocations for the pension plans by asset 
category follow:

At December 31,

Asset Category
Equity securities
Debt securities
Real estate
Other
Total

2007

2006

59%
18
6
17
100%

63%
16
4
17
100%

Equity securities include Verizon common stock of $127 million and $95 
million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Other assets include 
cash and cash equivalents (primarily held for the payment of benefits), 
private equity and investments in absolute return strategies.

Health Care and Life Plans
The weighted-average asset allocations for the other postretirement ben-
efit plans by asset category follow:

At December 31,

Asset Category
Equity securities
Debt securities
Other
Total

2007

2006

74%
21
5
 100%

72%
21
7
100%

There was no Verizon common stock held at the end of 2007 and 2006 in 
the health care and life plans.

Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The benefit payments to retirees, which reflect expected future service, 
are expected to be paid as follows:

$

Pension
Benefits

4,422
3,665
2,944
2,921
2,864
13,926

2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013 – 2017

(dollars in millions)

Health Care and Life
Prior to Medicare
Prescription
Drug Subsidy

Expected 
Medicare Prescription
Drug Subsidy

$

1,925
2,036
2,131
2,205
2,212
11,045

$

88
99
110
120
133
838

Savings Plan and Employee Stock Ownership Plans
We  maintain  four  leveraged  employee  stock  ownership  plans  (ESOP). 
Only one plan currently has unallocated shares. We match a certain per-
centage  of  eligible  employee  contributions  to  the  savings  plans  with 
shares of our common stock from this ESOP. At December 31, 2007, the 
number of unallocated and allocated shares of common stock in this 
ESOP  were  4  million  and  77  million,  respectively.  All  leveraged  ESOP 
shares are included in earnings per share computations.

Total savings plan costs were $712 million, $669 million, and $499 million 
in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. 

Severance Benefits
The  following  table  provides  an  analysis  of  our  severance  liability 
recorded  in  accordance  with  SFAS  No.  112,  Employers’  Accounting  for 
Postemployment Benefits (SFAS No. 112):

This portfolio strategy emphasizes a long-term equity orientation, signifi-
cant global diversification, the use of both public and private investments 
and professional financial and operational risk controls. Assets are allo-
cated according to a long-term policy neutral position and held within 
a relatively narrow and pre-determined range. Both active and passive 
management approaches are used depending on perceived market effi-
ciencies and various other factors.

Year

2005
2006
2007

Beginning 
of Year

Charged to
Expense

Payments

Other End of Year

(dollars in millions)

$

$

753
596
644

$

99
343
743

$

(251)
(383)
(363)

(5)
88
–

$

596
644
1,024

Cash Flows
In 2007, we contributed $612 million to our qualified pension plans, $125 
million to our nonqualified pension plans and $1,048 million to our other 
postretirement benefit plans. We estimate required qualified pension plan 
contributions for 2008 to be approximately $350 million. We also antici-
pate $130 million in contributions to our non-qualified pension plans 
and $1,580 million to our other postretirement benefit plans in 2008.

The  remaining  severance  liability  is  actuarially  determined. The  2007 
expense  includes  charges  for  the  involuntary  separation  of  approxi-
mately  9,000  employees,  including  approximately  4,000  during  the 
fourth quarter of 2007 and 5,000 expected during 2008. In addition, the 
expense includes costs associated with higher assumed attrition beyond 
2008. The 2006 expense includes charges for the involuntary separation 
of 4,100 employees (see Note 3).

64

 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

NOTE  16

INCOME  TAxES 

The  components  of  Income  Before  Provision  for  Income  Taxes, 
Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Item and Cumulative Effect of 
Accounting Change are as follows:

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Domestic 
Foreign

$ 8,508
984
$ 9,492

$

$

7,000
1,154
8,154

$

$

7,707
741
8,448

The components of the provision for income taxes from continuing oper-
ations are as follows:

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Valuation allowance
Deferred tax assets

Current
  Federal
  Foreign
  State and local

Deferred
  Federal
  Foreign
  State and local

Investment tax credits
Total income tax expense

$ 2,568
461
545
3,574

397
66
(48)
415
(7)
$ 3,982

$

$

2,364
141
421
2,926

(9)
(45)
(191)
(245)
(7)
2,674

$

$

2,772
81
661
3,514

(844)
(55)
(187)
(1,086)
(7)
2,421

The  following  table  shows  the  principal  reasons  for  the  difference 
between the effective income tax rate and the statutory federal income 
tax rate:

Years Ended December 31,

2007

2006

2005

Statutory federal income tax rate
Distributions from foreign investments
State and local income tax, net of federal  

tax benefits

Tax benefits from investment losses
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated 

businesses

Other, net
Effective income tax rate

35.0 %
5.9

35.0 %
–

35.0 %
2.0

3.4
(0.8)

(2.3)
0.8
42.0 %

1.8
(0.9)

(3.8)
0.7
32.8 %

3.6
(4.5)

(3.5)
(3.9)
28.7 %

The  effective  income  tax  rate  is  the  provision  for  income  taxes  as  a 
percentage  of  income  from  continuing  operations  before  the  provi-
sion for income taxes. The effective income tax rate in 2007 compared 
to 2006 was higher primarily due to recording $610 million of foreign 
and  domestic  taxes  and  expenses  specifically  relating  to  our  share  of 
Vodafone Omnitel’s distributable earnings. Verizon received a net distri-
bution from Vodafone Omnitel in December 2007 of approximately $2.1 
billion and anticipates that it may receive an additional distribution from 
Vodafone  Omnitel  within  the  next  twelve  months. The  2007  rate  was 
also increased due to higher state taxes in 2007 as compared to 2006, 
as well as greater benefits from foreign operations in 2006 compared to 
2007. These increases were partially offset by lower expenses recorded for 
unrecognized tax benefits in 2007 as compared to 2006.

Our effective income tax rate in 2006 was higher than 2005 primarily as a 
result of favorable tax settlements and the recognition of capital loss carry 
forwards in 2005. These increases were partially offset by tax benefits from 
foreign operations and lower state taxes in 2006 compared to 2005.

Deferred taxes arise because of differences in the book and tax bases of 
certain assets and liabilities. Significant components of deferred tax are 
shown in the following table:

At December 31,

Employee benefits
Tax loss carry forwards
Uncollectible accounts receivable
Other – assets

Former MCI intercompany accounts receivable  

basis difference

Depreciation
Leasing activity
Wireless joint venture including wireless licenses
Other – liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax liability

(dollars in millions)
2006

2007

$ 7,067
2,868
400
422
10,757
(2,671)
8,086

$

7,788
2,994
455
903
12,140
(2,600)
9,540

1,977
7,045
2,307
11,634
349
23,312
$ 15,226

2,003
7,617
2,674
12,177
2,493
26,964
$ 17,424

Employee benefits deferred tax assets include $4,929 million and $5,590 
million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, recognized in accor-
dance with SFAS No. 158 (see Notes 1 and 15). 

At December 31, 2007, undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries 
indefinitely  invested  outside  of  the  United  States  amounted  to 
approximately  $900  million. We  have  not  provided  deferred  taxes  on 
these  earnings  because  we  intend  that  they  will  remain  indefinitely 
invested outside of the United States. Determination of the amount of 
unrecognized deferred taxes related to these undistributed earnings is 
not practical.

At  December  31,  2007,  we  had  net  operating  loss  carry  forwards  for 
income tax purposes of approximately $3,600 million, expiring through 
2026 in various foreign, state and local jurisdictions. The amount of tax 
loss  carry  forwards  reflected  as  a  deferred  tax  asset  above  has  been 
reduced by approximately $1,017 million due to federal and state tax law 
limitations on utilization of net operating losses. 

During 2007, the valuation allowance increased $71 million. Under cur-
rent accounting guidelines, approximately $2.0 billion of the valuation 
allowance, if recognized, would be recorded as a reduction of goodwill. 

65

 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

FASB Interpretation No. 48
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted FIN 48, which prescribes the rec-
ognition,  measurement  and  disclosure  standards  for  uncertainties  in 
income tax positions. See Note 1 for a discussion of the impact to Verizon 
of adopting this new accounting pronouncement. 

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized 
tax benefits is as follows: 

Balance at January 1, 2007
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Additions for tax positions of prior years
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
Settlements
Lapses of statutes of limitations
Balance at December 31, 2007

(dollars in millions)

$

2,958
141
291
(420)
(11)
(76)
$ 2,883

Included in the total unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007 
is  $1,245  million  that,  if  recognized,  would  favorably  affect  the  effec-
tive income tax rate. The remaining unrecognized tax benefits relate to 
temporary items that would not affect the effective income tax rate and 
uncertain tax positions resulting from prior acquisitions which, pursuant 
to current purchase accounting tax rules, would adjust goodwill. 

We recognize any interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized 
tax benefits in income tax expense. During the year ended December 
31, 2007, we recognized approximately $154 million (after-tax) for the 
payment of interest and penalties. We had approximately $598 million 
(after-tax) and $444 million (after-tax) for the payment of interest and 
penalties accrued in the balance sheet at December 31, 2007 and January 
1, 2007, respectively. 

Verizon or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. fed-
eral  jurisdiction,  and  various  state,  local  and  foreign  jurisdictions. The 
Company is generally no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or 
non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2000. 
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is currently examining the Company’s 
U.S. income tax returns for years 2000 through 2003. As a large taxpayer, 
we are under continual audit by the IRS and other taxing authorities on 
numerous open tax positions. It is possible that the amount of the lia-
bility for unrecognized tax benefits could change by a significant amount 
during the next twelve month period. An estimate of the range of the 
possible change cannot be made until issues are further developed or 
examinations close.

NOTE  17

SEGMENT  INFORMATION 

Reportable Segments
On March 30, 2007, we completed the sale of our 52% interest in TELPRI. 
On  February  12,  2007  we  entered  into  an  MOU  to  sell  our  interest  in 
CANTV. On December 1, 2006, we closed the sale of Verizon Dominicana. 
Consequently, with these three transactions, we completed the disposi-
tion of our International segment. For further information concerning the 
disposition of the International segment, see Note 2.

On November 17, 2006, we completed the spin-off of our Information 
Services segment which included our domestic print and Internet yellow 
pages directories business. For further information concerning the dispo-
sition of the Information Services segment, see Note 2.

We now have two reportable segments, which we operate and manage 
as strategic business units and organize by products and services. We 
measure  and  evaluate  our  reportable  segments  based  on  segment 
income. Corporate, eliminations and other includes unallocated corpo-
rate expenses, intersegment eliminations recorded in consolidation, the 
results of other businesses such as our investments in unconsolidated 
businesses, lease financing, and other adjustments and gains and losses 
that are not allocated in assessing segment performance due to their 
non-recurring or unusual nature. These adjustments include transactions 
that the chief operating decision makers exclude in assessing business 
unit performance due primarily to their non-recurring and/or non-opera-
tional nature. Although such transactions are excluded from the business 
segment results, they are included in reported consolidated earnings. 
Gains and losses that are not individually significant are included in all 
segment results, since these items are included in the chief operating 
decision makers’ assessment of unit performance. 

Our segments and their principal activities consist of the following:

Segment

Wireline

Description

Wireline  communications  services  include  voice,  Internet 
access,  broadband  video  and  data,  next  generation  IP 
network  services,  network  access,  long  distance  and  other 
services.  We  provide  these  services  to  consumers,  carriers, 
businesses  and  government  customers  both  domestically 
and internationally in 150 countries.

Domestic Wireless Domestic  Wireless’s  products  and  services  include  wireless 
voice,  data  products,  and  other  value-added  services  and 
equipment sales across the United States.

66

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

The following table provides operating financial information for our two reportable segments:

2007

Wireline

Domestic Wireless

External revenues
Intersegment revenues
  Total operating revenues
Cost of services and sales
Selling, general & administrative expense
Depreciation & amortization expense
  Total operating expenses
Operating income
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated businesses 
Other income and (expense), net
Interest expense
Minority interest
Provision for income taxes
Segment income

Assets
Plant, property and equipment, net
Capital expenditures

2006

External revenues
Intersegment revenues
  Total operating revenues
Cost of services and sales
Selling, general & administrative expense
Depreciation & amortization expense
  Total operating expenses
Operating income
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated businesses 
Other income and (expense), net
Interest expense
Minority interest
Provision for income taxes
Segment income

Assets
Plant, property and equipment, net
Capital expenditures

2005

External revenues
Intersegment revenues
  Total operating revenues
Cost of services and sales
Selling, general & administrative expense
Depreciation & amortization expense
  Total operating expenses
Operating income
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated businesses 
Other income and (expense), net
Interest expense
Minority interest
Provision for income taxes
Segment income

Assets
Plant, property and equipment, net
Capital expenditures

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

49,059
1,257
50,316
25,220
11,236
9,184
45,640
4,676
–
206
(2,032)
–
(1,344)
1,506

92,264
58,702
10,956

49,555
 1,173
50,728
24,767
11,820
9,590
46,177
4,551
–
250
 (2,062)
–
(1,114)
1,625

92,274
57,031
10,259

36,628
988
37,616
15,813
8,210
8,801
32,824
4,792
–
79
(1,701)
–
(1,264)
1,906

75,188
49,618
8,267

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

43,777
105
43,882
13,456
13,477
5,154
32,087
11,795
32
(3)
(251)
(5,053)
(2,726)
3,794

83,755
25,971
6,503

37,930
113
38,043
11,491
12,039
4,913
28,443
9,600
19
4
(452)
(4,038)
(2,157)
2,976

81,989
24,659
6,618

32,219
82
32,301
9,393
10,768
4,760
24,921
7,380
27
6
(601)
(2,995)
(1,598)
2,219

76,729
22,790
6,484

(dollars in millions)
Total Segments

$

$

92,836
1,362
94,198
38,676
24,713
14,338
77,727
16,471
32
203
(2,283)
(5,053)
(4,070)
5,300

$ 176,019
84,673
17,459

$

$

$

$

$

$

87,485
1,286
88,771
36,258
23,859
14,503
74,620
14,151
19
254
(2,514)
(4,038)
(3,271)
4,601

174,263
81,690
16,877

68,847
1,070
69,917
25,206
18,978
13,561
57,745
12,172
27
85
(2,302)
(2,995)
(2,862)
4,125

151,917
72,408
14,751

67

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

Reconciliation To Consolidated Financial Information
A reconciliation of the results for the operating segments to the applicable line items in the consolidated financial statements is as follows:

Operating Revenues
Total reportable segments
Impact of hawaii (2005) and other operations sold (2006) 
Corporate, eliminations and other
Consolidated operating revenues – reported

Operating Expenses
Total reportable segments
Merger integration costs (see Note 8)
Access line spin-off related charges (see Note 2)
Taxes on foreign distributions (see Note 6)
Verizon Center relocation (see Note 3)
Severance, pension and benefit charges, net (see Note 3)
Impact of hawaii (2005) and other operations sold (2006) (see Note 2)
Sales of businesses net (see Note 2)
Lease impairment and other items (see Note 3)
Verizon Foundation contribution (see Note 2)
Corporate, eliminations and other
Consolidated operating expenses – reported 

Net Income
Segment income – reportable segments
Debt extinguishment costs (see Note 11)
Merger integration costs (see Note 8)
Sales of businesses and investments, net (see Note 2)
Extraordinary item (see Note 2)
Access line spin-off related charges (see Note 2)
Taxes on foreign distributions (see Note 6)
Cumulative effect of accounting change (see Note 1)
Verizon Center relocation, net (see Note 3)
Severance, pension and benefit charges (see Note 3)
Domestic print and Internet yellow pages directories business  

spin-off costs (see Note 2)

Lease impairment and other items (see Note 3)
Tax benefits (see Note 3)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax (see Note 2)
Corporate and other
Consolidated net income – reported

Assets
Total reportable segments
Reconciling items
Consolidated assets

Financial information for Wireline excludes the effects of hawaii access 
lines and directory operations sold in 2005, in addition to the sale of non-
strategic assets of the Wireline segment sold in the first quarter of 2007.

We generally account for intersegment sales of products and services 
and asset transfers at current market prices. We are not dependent on 
any single customer.

68

2007

94,198
–
(729)
93,469

77,727
178
84
15 
–
772
–
–
–
100
(985)
77,891

5,300
–
(112)
5
(131)
(80)
(610)
–
–
(477)

– 
–
–
72
1,554
5,521

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ 176,019
10,940
$ 186,959

Geographic Areas

2006

88,771
104
(693)
88,182

74,620
232
–
–
184
425
89
–
–
–
(741)
74,809

4,601
(16)
(146)
(541)
–
–
–
(42)
(118)
(258)

(101)
–
–
1,398
1,420
6,197

174,263
14,541
188,804

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

(dollars in millions)
2005

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

69,917
180
(579)
69,518

57,745
–
–
–
(18)
157
118
(530)
125
–
(660)
56,937

4,125
–
–
336
–
–
(206)
–
8
(95)

– 
(133)
336
1,370
1,656
7,397

151,917
16,213
168,130

Our  foreign  investments  are  located  principally  in  the  Americas  and 
Europe.  Domestic  and  foreign  operating  revenues  are  based  on  the 
location of customers. Long-lived assets consist of plant, property and 
equipment (net of accumulated depreciation) and investments in uncon-
solidated businesses. The table below presents financial information by 
major geographic area:

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Domestic
Operating revenues
Long-lived assets

International
Operating revenues
Long-lived assets

$ 89,504
85,081

$ 84,731
82,277

$ 69,327
74,813

3,965
3,585

3,451
4,947

191
2,776

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

NOTE  18

COMPREhENSIVE  INCOME

Comprehensive  income  consists  of  net  income  and  other  gains  and 
losses affecting shareowners’ investment that, under GAAP, are excluded 
from  net  income.  Significant  changes  in  the  components  of  other 
comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax expense (benefit), are 
described below.

Foreign Currency Translation

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Foreign Currency Translation 

Adjustments:

Vodafone Omnitel
CANTV
Verizon Dominicana
Other international operations

$

$

397
412
–
29
838

$

$

330
–
786
80
1,196

$

$

(590)
(47)
(114)
(4)
(755)

We sold our interest in CANTV during the second quarter of 2007. We 
sold  our  interest  in Verizon  Dominicana  during  the  fourth  quarter  of 
2006. See Note 2 for information on CANTV and Verizon Dominicana. The 
foreign currency translation adjustment in 2005 represents unrealized 
losses from the decline in the functional currencies of our investments in 
Vodafone Omnitel, Verizon Dominicana and CANTV. 

Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Securities
The changes in Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Securities were 
as follows:

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The  components  of  Accumulated  Other  Comprehensive  Loss  are  as 
follows:

At December 31,

Foreign currency translation adjustments
Net unrealized losses on hedging
Unrealized gains on marketable securities 
Defined benefit pension and postretirement plans
Other
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

(dollars in millions)
2006

2007

$ 1,167
(10)
60
(5,723)
–
$ (4,506)

$

$

329
(11)
64
(7,671)
(241)
(7,530)

The foreign currency translation adjustments at December 31, 2007 were 
primarily comprised of unrealized gains in the value of our investment in 
Vodafone Omnitel as a result of the appreciation of the Euro.

NOTE  19

ADDITIONAL  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION

The tables that follow provide additional financial information related to 
our consolidated financial statements:

Income Statement Information

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Depreciation expense
Interest cost incurred
Capitalized interest
Advertising expense

$ 13,036
2,258
(429)
2,463

$ 13,122
2,811
(462)
2,271

$ 12,171
2,481
(352)
1,844

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Balance Sheet Information

Unrealized Gains (Losses) on 

Marketable Securities

Unrealized gains, net of taxes of  

$13, $30 and $10

Less reclassification adjustments for 

gains realized in net income,  
net of taxes of $11, $13 and $14

Net unrealized gains (losses) on  

marketable securities

$

13

$

79

$

4

(17)

(25)

(25)

$

(4)

$

54

$

(21)

Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Plans
During  2007,  the  change  in  defined  benefit  pension  and  postretire-
ment plans of $1,948 million, net of taxes of $661 million, represents the 
change in the funded status of the plans in connection with the annual 
pension and postretirement valuation in accordance with SFAS No. 158. 
The funded status was impacted by changes in actuarial assumptions, 
asset performance and plan experience.

At December 31,

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses
Accrued vacation, salaries and wages
Interest payable
Accrued taxes

Other Current Liabilities
Advance billings and customer deposits
Dividends payable
Other

(dollars in millions)
2006

2007

$ 4,491
2,400
4,828
473
2,270
$ 14,462

$

4,392
2,982
3,575
614
2,757
$ 14,320

$ 2,476
1,266
3,583
$ 7,325

$

$

2,226
1,199
4,666
8,091

69

 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

Cash Flow Information 

Years Ended December 31,

2007

(dollars in millions)
2005

2006

Cash Paid
Income taxes, net of amounts refunded
Interest, net of amounts capitalized

$ 2,491
1,682

$

3,299
2,103

$

4,189
2,025

Supplemental Investing and Financing 

Transactions

Cash acquired in business combinations 
Assets acquired in business combinations
Liabilities assumed in business 

combinations

Debt assumed in business combinations
Shares issued to Price to acquire limited 
partnership interest in VZ East (Note 7)

17
589

154
–

2,361
18,511

7,813
6,169

–

1,007

– 
635

35
9

–

Other, net cash provided by operating activities – continuing operations 
primarily included the add back of the minority interest’s share of Verizon 
Wireless earnings, net of dividends paid to minority partners, of $3,953 
million in 2007, $3,232 million in 2006 and $1,720 million in 2005.

NOTE  20

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Several state and federal regulatory proceedings may require our tele-
phone operations to pay penalties or to refund to customers a portion 
of the revenues collected in the current and prior periods. There are also 
various legal actions pending to which we are a party and claims which, 
if asserted, may lead to other legal actions. We have established reserves 
for  specific  liabilities  in  connection  with  regulatory  and  legal  actions, 
including environmental matters, that we currently deem to be probable 
and estimable. We do not expect that the ultimate resolution of pending 
regulatory and legal matters in future periods, including the hicksville 
matter described below, will have a material effect on our financial con-
dition, but it could have a material effect on our results of operations for 
a given reporting period.

During  2003,  under  a  government-approved  plan,  remediation  com-
menced at the site of a former Sylvania facility in hicksville, New York 
that processed nuclear fuel rods in the 1950s and 1960s. Remediation 
beyond original expectations proved to be necessary and a reassessment 
of the anticipated remediation costs was conducted. A reassessment of 
costs related to remediation efforts at several other former facilities was 
also undertaken. In September 2005, the Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) 
accepted  the  hicksville  site  into  the  Formerly  Utilized  Sites  Remedial 
Action Program. This may result in the ACE performing some or all of the 
remediation effort for the hicksville site with a corresponding decrease 
in costs to Verizon. To the extent that the ACE assumes responsibility for 
remedial work at the hicksville site, an adjustment to a reserve previously 
established for the remediation may be necessary. Adjustments may also 
be necessary based upon actual conditions discovered during the reme-
diation at any of the sites requiring remediation.

70

In connection with the execution of agreements for the sales of businesses 
and investments, Verizon ordinarily provides representations and warran-
ties to the purchasers pertaining to a variety of nonfinancial matters, such 
as ownership of the securities being sold, as well as financial losses.

Subsequent to the sale of Verizon Information Services Canada in 2004, 
we continue to provide a guarantee to publish directories, which was 
issued when the directory business was purchased in 2001 and had a 
30-year term (before extensions). The preexisting guarantee continues, 
without modification, despite the subsequent sale of Verizon Information 
Services  Canada  and  the  spin-off  of  our  domestic  print  and  Internet 
yellow pages directories business. The possible financial impact of the 
guarantee, which is not expected to be adverse, cannot be reasonably 
estimated since a variety of the potential outcomes available under the 
guarantee result in costs and revenues or benefits that may offset each 
other. In addition, performance under the guarantee is not likely.

As of December 31, 2007, letters of credit totaling $225 million were exe-
cuted in the normal course of business, which support several financing 
arrangements and payment obligations to third parties.

We have several commitments primarily to purchase network services, 
equipment and software from a variety of suppliers totaling $844 million. 
Of this total amount, $613 million, $137 million, $51 million, $28 million, 
$5 million and $10 million are expected to be purchased in 2008, 2009, 
2010, 2011, 2012 and thereafter, respectively.

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements continued

NOTE  21

qUARTERLY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  (UNAUDITED)

(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

quarter Ended

2007
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31

2006
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31

Operating 
Revenues

Operating 
Income

$ 22,584
23,273
23,772
23,840

$ 21,231
21,886
22,459
22,606

$ 3,796
4,149
4,210
3,423

$

3,175
3,217
3,537
3,444

Income Before Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Item 
and Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
Per Share-
Basic

Per Share-
Diluted

Amount

$ 1,484
1,683
1,271
1,072

$

1,282
1,263
1,545
1,390

$

$

.51
.58
.44
.37

.44
.43
.53
.48

$

$

.51
.58
.44
.37

.44
.43
.53
.48

Net Income

$ 1,495
1,683
1,271
1,072

$

1,632
1,611
1,922
1,032

•	 Results	of	operations	for	the	first	quarter	of	2007	include	after-tax	charges	of	$9	million	for	merger	integration	costs,	$131	million	for	an	extraordinary	charge	related	to	the	nationalization	of	

CANTV, a $70 million after-tax gain on the sale of our interest in TELPRI and a $65 million after-tax contribution to the Verizon Foundation.

•	 Results	of	operations	for	the	second	quarter	of	2007	include	after-tax	charges	of	$17	million	for	merger	integration	costs.
•	 Results	of	operations	for	the	third	quarter	of	2007	include	after-tax	charges	of	$28	million	for	merger	integration	costs,	$44	million	related	to	access	line	spin-off	charges	and	$471	million	asso-

ciated with taxes on foreign distributions.

•	 Results	of	operations	for	the	fourth	quarter	of	2007	include	after-tax	charges	of	$58	million	for	merger	integration	costs,	$36	million	related	to	access	line	spin-off	charges,	$139	million	associ-

ated with taxes on foreign distributions, and $477 million for severance, pension and other charges.

•	 Results	of	operations	for	the	first	quarter	of	2006	include	after-tax	charges	of	$16	million	for	the	early	extinguishment	of	debt	related	to	the	MCI	merger,	$28	million	for	costs	associated	with	

the relocation to Verizon Center, $42 million for the impact of accounting for share based payments, and $35 million for merger integration costs.

•	 Results	of	operations	for	the	second	quarter	of	2006	include	after-tax	charges	of	$48	million	for	merger	integration	costs,	$29	million	for	costs	associated	with	the	relocation	to	Verizon	Center	

and $186 million for severance, pension and benefits charges.

•	 Results	of	operations	for	the	third	quarter	of	2006	include	after-tax	charges	of	$16	million	for	merger	integration	costs,	$31	million	for	costs	associated	with	the	relocation	to	Verizon	Center	

and $17 million for severance, pension and benefits charges.

•	 Results	of	operations	for	the	fourth	quarter	of	2006	include	after-tax	charges	of	$47	million	for	merger	integration	costs,	$30	million	for	costs	associated	with	the	relocation	to	Verizon	Center,	
$55 million for severance, pension and benefits charges, $541 million for the loss on sale of Verizon Dominicana included in discontinued operations, and $101 million for costs associated 
with the spin-off of our directories publishing business.
Income before discontinued operations per common share is computed independently for each quarter and the sum of the quarters may not equal the annual amount.

71

 
Board of Directors

Richard L. Carrión 
Chairman, President and 
Chief Executive Officer 
Popular, Inc. 
and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

M. Frances Keeth 
Retired Executive Vice President 
Royal Dutch Shell plc

Robert W. Lane 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
Deere & Company

Sandra O. Moose 
President 
Strategic Advisory Services LLC

Joseph Neubauer 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
ARAMARk holdings Corporation

Donald T. Nicolaisen 
Former Chief Accountant 
United States Securities and 
Exchange Commission

Thomas H. O’Brien 
Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 
and PNC Bank, N.A.

Clarence Otis, Jr. 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
Darden Restaurants, Inc.

Hugh B. Price 
Senior Fellow 
The Brookings Institution

Ivan G. Seidenberg 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
Verizon Communications Inc.

John W. Snow 
President 
JWS Associates, LLC

John R. Stafford 
Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
Wyeth

Robert D. Storey 
Retired Partner 
Thompson hine LLP

Retired in 2007:

James R. Barker 
Chairman 
The Interlake Steamship Co. and 
New England Fast Ferry Co. 
and Vice Chairman 
Mormac Marine Group, Inc. and 
Moran Towing Corporation

Walter V. Shipley 
Retired Chairman 
The Chase Manhattan Corporation

Corporate Officers and 
Executive Leadership

Ivan G. Seidenberg 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Dennis F. Strigl 
President and Chief Operating Officer

Doreen A. Toben 
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer

William P. Barr 
Executive Vice President and 
General Counsel

John W. Diercksen 
Executive Vice President – 
Strategy, Development and Planning

Shaygan Kheradpir 
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Information Officer

Richard J. Lynch 
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Technology Officer

Lowell C. McAdam 
Executive Vice President and 
President and Chief Executive Officer – 
Verizon Wireless

Marc C. Reed 
Executive Vice President – 
human Resources

John G. Stratton 
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Marketing Officer

Thomas J. Tauke 
Executive Vice President – 
Public Affairs, Policy and Communications

Thomas A. Bartlett 
Senior Vice President and Controller

Marianne Drost 
Senior Vice President, Deputy General 
Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Ronald H. Lataille 
Senior Vice President – Investor Relations

Kathleen H. Leidheiser 
Senior Vice President – Internal Auditing

Catherine T. Webster 
Senior Vice President and Treasurer

John F. Killian 
President – Verizon Business

Daniel S. Mead 
President – Verizon Services

Daniel C. Petri 
Group President – International

Virginia P. Ruesterholz 
President – Verizon Telecom

72

Investor Information

Registered Shareowner Services
Questions or requests for assistance regarding changes to or transfers 
of your registered stock ownership should be directed to our transfer 
agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. at:

Verizon Communications Shareowner Services 
c/o Computershare 
P.O. Box 43078 
Providence, RI 02940-3078 
Phone: 800 631-2355 
Website: www.computershare.com/verizon 
Email: verizon@computershare.com 

Persons outside the U.S. may call: 781 575-3994

Persons using a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call: 
800 524-9955

Online Account Access – Registered shareowners can view account 
information online at: www.computershare.com/verizon

You will need your account number, a password and taxpayer identifica-
tion number to enroll. For more information, contact Computershare.

Direct Dividend Deposit Service – Verizon offers an electronic funds 
transfer service to registered shareowners wishing to deposit dividends 
directly into savings or checking accounts on dividend payment dates. 
For more information, contact Computershare.

Direct Invest Stock Purchase and Ownership Plan – Verizon offers a 
direct stock purchase and share ownership plan. The plan allows cur-
rent and new investors to purchase common stock and to reinvest the 
dividends toward the purchase of additional shares. To receive a Plan 
Prospectus and enrollment form, contact Computershare or visit their 
website.

eTree® Program – Worldwide, Verizon is acting to conserve natural 
resources in a variety of ways. Now we are proud to offer shareowners 
an opportunity to be environmentally responsible. By receiving links 
to proxy, annual report and shareowner materials online, you can help 
Verizon reduce the amount of materials we print and mail. As a thank 
you for choosing electronic delivery, Verizon will plant a tree on your 
behalf. It’s fast and easy and you can change your electronic delivery 
options at any time. Sign up at www.eTree.com/verizon or call  
800 631-2355 or 781 575-3994.

Corporate Governance
Verizon’s Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our  
website – www.verizon.com/investor

If you would prefer to receive a printed copy in the mail, please contact 
the Assistant Corporate Secretary:

Verizon Communications Inc. 
Assistant Corporate Secretary 
140 West Street, 29th Floor 
New York, NY 10007 

v e r i zo n   co m m u n i c at i o n s   i n c .  2 0 0 7   a n n ua l   r e p o r t

Investor Services
Investor Website – Get company information and news on our  
website – www.verizon.com/investor

VZ Mail – Get the latest investor information delivered directly to your 
computer desktop. Subscribe to VzMail at our investor information 
website.

Stock Market Information
Shareowners of record at December 31, 2007: 836,237

Verizon is listed on the New York Stock Exchange  
(ticker symbol: VZ)

Also listed on the Philadelphia, Chicago, London, Swiss, Amsterdam and 
Frankfurt exchanges.

Common Stock Price and Dividend Information

2007
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

2006*
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

Market Price 
High  

Low

$ 38.77 $ 35.60
36.75
39.27
40.77

43.99  
44.75  
46.24  

Cash  
Dividend 
Declared 

$ 0.405
0.405
0.430
0.430

$

$

33.89
33.46
36.62
37.64

28.95
29.00
30.22
33.99

$

0.405
0.405
0.405
0.405

*2006 prices have been adjusted for the spin-off of our domestic print and 
Internet yellow pages directory business.

Form 10–K
To receive a copy of the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, contact Investor 
Relations:

Verizon Communications Inc. 
Investor Relations 
One Verizon Way 
Basking Ridge, NJ 07920 
Phone: 212 395-1525 

Certifications Regarding Public Disclosures & Listing Standards
The 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission includes the certifications required by Section 
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding the quality of Verizon’s 
public disclosure. In addition, the annual certification of the chief 
executive officer regarding compliance by Verizon with the corporate 
governance listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange was 
submitted without qualification following the 2007 annual meeting of 
shareholders.

Equal Opportunity Policy
Verizon maintains a long-standing commitment to equal opportunity 
and valuing the diversity of its employees, suppliers and customers. 
Verizon is fully committed to a workplace free from discrimination and 
harassment for all persons, without regard to race, color, religion, age, 
gender, national origin, sexual orientation, marital status, citizenship 
status, veteran status, disability or other protected classifications.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Verizon Communications Inc.
140 West Street
New York, New York 10007
212 395-1000

verizon.com

©2008. Verizon. All Rights Reserved.
002CS-60954

Printed on recycled paper

this document is printed on recycled paper which 
contains at least 10% post-consumer waste.