Quarterlytics / Energy / Oil & Gas Equipment & Services / Vita Life Sciences Limited

Vita Life Sciences Limited

vls · LSE Energy
Claim this profile
Ticker vls
Exchange LSE
Sector Energy
Industry Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2016 Annual Report · Vita Life Sciences Limited
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Velocys plc
115e Olympic Avenue
Milton Park
Abingdon
Oxfordshire
OX14 4SA

Company Number: 05712187
www.velocys.com

Annual report and accounts 2016
Developing a platform for growth

3    Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys
Velocys is the Company at the forefront of smaller scale gas-to-liquids 
(GTL). It has a leadership position in connecting stranded and low value 
feedstocks, such as natural gas, landfill gas or biomass, with markets 
for premium products, such as renewable diesel, jet fuel and waxes. 
With its partners, Velocys is focused on delivering the most economically-
compelling conversion solution; a fully integrated offer that can be 
deployed repeatedly to achieve scale. 

Developing a platform for growth
2016 has been an immensely important year for us. 
Our significantly increased involvement and operational 
control in the ENVIA Oklahoma plant has been critical to 
achieving first product there. We continue to transform 
the Company from being purely a technology provider to 
one with solid in-house experience in project governance, 
and GTL plant engineering and operations capabilities.

Highlights

ENVIA – involvement
January 2016 onwards

Greater equity stake and management 
control in the project for Velocys after a 
US$2.6m equity contribution and US$9.3m 
secured loan facility were made available 
to ENVIA. Key leadership role for Velocys in 
the commissioning, start-up and operation 
of the plant.

ENVIA – milestones
September 2016

Plant construction complete.

February 2017 (post-period end)

Production of first Fischer-Tropsch product.

Read more on page

8

Read more on page

8

Strategy
December 2016

Fundraise
May 2017 (post period end)

Review of Company strategy completed 
and communicated. First strategic 
alliances formed with Morimatsu and 
TRI (post period end).

Fundraise of over £10m (before expenses) 
to progress the implementation of the 
new strategy.

Read more on pages

32

Read more on pages

16

17

Around the business

˜	 Appointed David Pummell as CEO.

˜	 Revenue of £1.4m (FY 2015: £2.0 m).

˜	 Projects being developed by third parties 

˜	 Cash* at year end of £18.7m 

continue to reach milestones:

(FY 2015: £37.7 m).

−  Preliminary engineering studies 

˜	 H2 2016 cash outflow of £5.4m 

completed, including a GTL project in 
Central Asia.

−  Air permit granted on a third party project 

versus  H1 (£13.6m). 

*  Defined as cash, cash equivalents and short-

term investments (see note 23).

in the US.

Production of first Fischer-
Tropsch product at ENVIA, 
which is the first commercial 
smaller scale GTL plant in the 
world, represented a significant 
milestone for Velocys. We have 
begun leveraging this success, 
implementing our new strategy, 
and focusing on specific markets 
and developing the partnerships 
to unlock them.”

David Pummell
CEO

Read more on pages

12

13

Front cover and above: ENVIA Energy’s GTL plant in Oklahoma City. ENVIA Energy is a joint 
venture, of which Velocys is a member, formed in March 2014 to produce renewable fuels 
and chemicals from landfill gas and natural gas. 

Read more on page

8

Contents

0 

Indicates references to other pages 
in this annual report.

   Indicates references to further 
   online content.

Chairman’s statement 
ENVIA Energy project overview 

Strategic report
2  Our business at a glance
2  Our strategy
4  Our focus markets
6 
8 
12  CEO’s report 
14  Our technology
16  Financial review
17  Corporate social responsibility
17  Key performance indicators (KPIs)
18  Risks and mitigation

Governance
22  Corporate governance report
24  Our Board of directors
28  Directors’ report
30  Directors’ remuneration report
34  Statement of directors’ responsibilities
35 

Independent auditors’ report

39 

40 

Financial statements
37  Consolidated income statement 
38 

 Consolidated statement  
of comprehensive income
 Consolidated statement of financial 
position
 Velocys plc statement of financial 
position
 Consolidated statement of changes  
in equity
 Velocys plc statement of changes 
in equity
 Consolidated statement of cash flows
43 
 Velocys plc statement of cash flows
44 
45 
 Notes to the financial statements
IBC   Directors, secretary and advisors to 

42 

41 

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    1

the Company

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t

G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

i

F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

 
 
 
 
 
 
Our business at a glance 
Velocys has a strong, multi-disciplinary staff operating 
from its commercial centre in Houston, Texas and technical 
facilities near Oxford, UK and Columbus, Ohio. We have 
an experienced Fischer-Tropsch team, and our core 
competences extend beyond technology development 
to process engineering and the commissioning and  
start-up of commercial gas-to-liquids (GTL) projects. 

Business influences
Throughout the strategic report we highlight content relating 
 to four areas that will be critical to our future success.

Technical expertise
We are recognised as 
leaders in smaller scale 
GTL technology (plants with 
capacities of 500 to 10,000 
barrels per day). We have 
expertise throughout the 
design, commissioning and 
operation of plants.

Commercial growth
First product has been 
produced at the commercial 
reference plant for Velocys’ 
technology – a physical 
site where stakeholders 
can see our technology in 
situ. ENVIA Energy’s plant 
will be a springboard for 
commercial growth. 

Development of an 
integrated offer
In partnership, we are 
adopting a proactive 
approach, aiming to develop 
a fully integrated and 
cost-effective plant offer, 
reducing delivery risk and 
accelerating growth.

Focus markets
In the medium term we are 
focused on a small number of 
markets that we see as being 
high growth and material: 
renewable fuels in the US 
(and targeted Asian markets) 
and stranded gas-to-wax in 
North America. 

Our strategy

Background 
The thorough review of Velocys’ strategy 
undertaken in 2016 focused on the best 
way to leverage the core assets and 
capabilities of the Company in the most 
attractive markets, where there should 
be a clear advantage over its competition 
through differentiation. 

Strengths
˜		ENVIA Energy’s Oklahoma City plant – 

Market dynamics and challenges
˜	 Oil price slowly recovering from 

first smaller scale GTL plant in the world.
˜		Differentiated technology – recognised 

cycle low.

˜	 Fully exploiting our first mover 

as market leader.

advantage.

˜	 Prospective revenues from 

˜	 Securing funding for Velocys plc and for 

licensing model.

˜		World class technology, engineering 
capability and operations team.

˜		Experienced leadership team.

first of a kind plants.

˜	 Relentlessly driving down overall plant 

costs to access wider markets.

Four strategic aims

Business model –  
Increase control but remain 'capital light'
˜		Consolidate our market leading 

Strategic alliances –  
World class partnerships
˜	  Work with partners with 

position.

˜		Develop and deliver projects  

with partners. 

complementary resources 
and capabilities.

˜		Drive access and growth in material, 

˜		Grow revenues from reactor, catalyst, 

high-return markets.

operations and licence.

˜		Create scale and repeatability  

˜		Selectively inject early capital.

at pace.

Velocys has identified a number of 
strategic aims; fundamentals on which 
the Company will focus during the early 
years of the roll out of its strategy.”

David Pummell 
CEO

Read the CEO’s 
report on pages

12 

13

Velocys is well positioned, 
and our newly focused 
business model will drive 
commercialisation in the 
renewable fuels market, 
enabling our technology 
to be incorporated in 
multiple plants with 
standardised design.”

David Pummell 
CEO

The offer –  
One-stop shop
˜		Develop fully integrated, financed, 

cost-effective and operations-ready 
plant solution. 

Leverage differentiated capabilities – 
Build from core technology base
˜	  Build and enhance technology, 

engineering and operations capabilities. 
 Work seamlessly with partners. 
 Drive lowest cost. 

˜ 
˜ 

Focus markets
As part of the strategy review the Company 
identified the following attractive markets 
on which it will continue to focus:
1.  Renewable diesel and jet fuels, from 

woody biomass, in US markets. This is 
the market of Velocys’ immediate focus.

2.  Premium wax products, from both 
stranded gas and landfill gas in 
North America.

3.  Renewable fuels, from woody biomass, 

in targeted Asian markets.

Velocys’ medium-term goals are to:
˜	 Build a leading market supply position 

in the above markets.

˜	 Leverage the stranded GTL offer 

developed in North America to access 
Asian opportunities using stranded gas 
as feedstock.

˜	 Develop an integrated GTL solution 
to reduce the flaring of associated 
gas offshore.

Read about our 
markets on pages

54 

Delivery through partnership 
We aim to drive the roll out of Velocys’ 
technology by creating, with partners, an 
integrated plant offer in each of the focus 
markets, which includes fully integrated, 
designed, constructed and commissioned 
plants, fully financed, with feedstock and 
offtake agreements in place. We intend 
for this offer to be deployed across 
multiple plants. 

The first phase of strategy implementation 
is to secure the robust technology 
partnership platform needed to develop 
the integrated offer for the renewable 
fuels market in the US. In early 2017 we 
announced the following new relationships:
˜	 Morimatsu, for modularisation and 

fabrication.

˜	 TRI, for gasification technology.

Read more in our CEO’s 
report on pages

12 

13

The next phase is to put in place 
a consortium of partners with the aim 
of delivering the wider commercial 
renewable fuels offer. Our commercial 
team is now engaging with a range of 
targeted potential partners from woody 
biomass suppliers, commodity traders 
and airlines, to providers of equity and debt 
financing. Our intent is that these partners 
will be strategically-aligned and have 
complementary resources, capabilities 
and influence in our target market to 
support the roll out of a number of plants 
and open up broader financing options. 
We have set ourselves the challenging goal 
of building this consortium and securing 
the first final investment decision for a 
renewable fuels plant.

The Company intends to assemble 
a consortium of partners to deliver the 
integrated offer for the stranded gas-to-
wax market over a longer timescale. 

As well as developing its own integrated 
offers for its focus markets, Velocys 
will continue licensing its technology 
to third party developers in these, and 
other, markets.

Revenue streams 
Velocys’ business model is based on 
making a relatively low investment in 
early stage project engineering and 
site development to accelerate the 
project development phase. This “capital 
light” approach to commercialisation 
demonstrates our commitment to our 
technology and chosen routes to market. 
Velocys’ revenue will predominantly flow 
from the licensing of its technology, sales 
of its reactors and catalyst, and revenues 
from operations management support, 
plant commissioning and start-up services.  

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t

G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

i

F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

2    Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    3

 
 
Our focus markets 
The strategy review identified a number of attractive markets 
on which Velocys will focus its integrated offers, with the 
objective of creating sustainable growth. The renewable fuels 
market is Velocys’ immediate focus. This and the stranded 
gas market offer significant volume and potential growth. 
Offshore flared gas is a longer-term, substantial proposition. 

Supply of renewable diesel and jet fuels and 
premium wax products.

Monetisation of stranded gas, to produce wax 
in North America.

An integrated GTL solution to reduce the flaring 
of associated gas offshore.

Renewable fuels credits defined
˜	RFS – US federal Renewable 

Fuel Standard.

˜	RIN – US federal Renewable 

Identification Numbers credits.
˜	LCFS – Californian Low Carbon 

Fuel Standard.

Indicative renewable fuels credit values 
are based on prices in February 2017.

Market of primary focus – renewable fuels
The mandates of the US RFS and the 
Californian LCFS create an increasing 
demand for cellulosic biofuels. In California 
alone, a renewable diesel supply capacity 
shortfall of 50,000 to 80,000 barrels per 
day (bpd) is expected by 2023. For the US to 
meet COP21 commitments of using a 3% 
blend of renewable jet fuel in the overall fuel 
pool, over 40,000 bpd of new capacity would 
be needed by 2020. These are markets that 
Velocys can address with its smaller scale 
gas-to-liquids (GTL) technology. Using 
certain feedstocks, fuels produced using 
Fischer-Tropsch (FT) technology qualify for 
the highest level of RIN credits, with a price 
of around $194/barrel. 

In California, Velocys’ renewable diesel 
would qualify for the LCFS credit with an 
additional value of $33/barrel (based on 
a 60% greenhouse gas reduction relative 
to conventional fuels). In these markets, 
compared to other biomass-based fuel 
production technologies, Velocys’ FT 
technology is cost competitive, is less reliant 
on incentives, has lower ongoing feedstock 
costs and has access to an abundance of 
potential feedstock. 

This technology route is one of a very 
small number of ways to produce 
high quality renewable fuels that can 
be blended at high percentages with 
petroleum-based products and that are 
compatible with existing infrastructure 
and engines. This enables airlines and 
truck fleet operators, for example, to meet 
low carbon targets and corporate social 
responsibility obligations. 

The Company is also pursuing opportunities 
for renewable fuels, from woody biomass, 
in targeted Asian markets.

Stranded gas 
Smaller scale GTL can be an economic 
route to the monetisation of stranded 
gas resources that are hard to exploit 
by other means, even at times of low oil 
prices. Velocys’ FT technology produces 
high value waxes at volumes that match 
market requirements. Speciality waxes 
command high prices even when the oil 
price is low. The economics for gas-to-
wax plants are competitive with other 
gas monetisation options. 

In this market Velocys is initially targeting 
Western Canada, where gas prices in certain 
fields are significantly lower than US market 
prices and there is no other viable route to 
market. This situation is expected to persist 
over the long term. This route to market 
could be adopted by Asian companies that 
own fields in the region and replicated in 
the other geographic markets where they 
own stranded gas reserves. There is further 
upside arising from an increased oil price, 
when plants producing fuels (rather than 
waxes) will become increasingly attractive.

Landfill gas
Approximately 250 million tonnes per year 
of municipal solid waste is sent to landfill 
in the US. The US Environmental Protection 
Agency estimates that 17% of total 
methane gas released from human activity 
in the US is from municipal solid waste 
landfills. As indicated at ENVIA’s Oklahoma 
City plant, Velocys’ FT technology is well 
placed to convert landfill gas to renewable 
fuels and waxes, the markets for which 
are discussed above. ENVIA continues to 
evaluate future projects using learnings 
from the first plant.

Longer-term market – offshore flared gas 
With an identified partner, Velocys is 
targeting the development of a unique 
technical solution to unlock oil production 
offshore, where no other economical means 
of disposing of associated gas exists. 
This is a very large market – over two billion 
standard cubic feet of associated gas is 
flared offshore every day. Flaring regulations 
are tightening, and oil production from some 
fields could be restricted, or prevented 
altogether. A technology solution is needed 
that makes use of the gas and enables 
future offshore oil exploration.

Velocys plans initially to enter the extended 
well test market in North America, where a 
technology solution would provide a means 
to avoid high costs associated with multiple 
appraisal wells. Longer term, Velocys, with 
its partners, aims to access the flared gas 
market via on-board floating production, 
storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels for 
deployment in Asia and Latin America, 
where a large proportion of offshore 
associated gas is flared. 

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t

G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

i

F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Markets of strategic focus

Key

Commercial 
reference plant

Velocys site

Focus 
markets

USA
˜	 Renewable fuels and speciality 
products from landfill gas.

˜	 Renewable jet fuel from biomass.
˜	 Renewable diesel from biomass, 

particularly in California.

˜	 Longer-term, prevention of gas 

flaring offshore.

Western Canada
˜	 Monetisation of stranded gas. 
˜	 Supply of premium waxes.

Asian market development
˜	 Renewable fuels in targeted 

Asian markets.

˜	 Longer-term, prevention of gas 

flaring offshore.

Note: Velocys will continue to license its technology to third party projects being developed in these and other regions.

Large addressable markets
Substantial potential volume and growth.

Landfill gas-to-wax, US

Renewable jet, US

Total addressable market

Renewable diesel, US

Stranded gas-to-wax, Canada

Indicative number of plants

Five year addressable market.

Ten year addressable market.

4    Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    5

 
 
Pierre Jungels, CBE
Chairman

Velocys has a new focus, 
a differentiated technology, 
£10m of additional funding 
and a strategy for growth with 
which it is making good early 
progress. Despite a challenging 
funding environment and 
a persistently low oil price 
Velocys is developing a 
platform for delivery that 
should stand the Company 
in good stead as we 
move forward.”

Chairman’s statement

6    Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t

G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

i

F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Introduction to our corporate governance

Our governance principles

Velocys has the ambition to grow 
significantly, and to develop into an 
established multinational business. 
The Company is in the process of 
implementing the required business level 
governance that is both scalable and has 
the flexibility to meet the requirements 
of delivering the new strategy. This 
governance covers the processes required 
to manage a number of parallel routes 
to market, with defined critical activities 
and key milestones that will drive risk 
management and decision making at 
both the executive and Board levels.

The composition of the Board has reflected 
the development of the Company, with 
a shift in emphasis from technological 
understanding to expertise in business, 
legal and finance. 

The switch in late 2015 to having most 
Board members sitting on only one or 
two committees demonstrated the new 
focus that the Board has developed in its 
corporate governance. 

The governance report gives:
˜	 A clear and honest view of progress 

throughout the year.

˜	 The outcome of our Board evaluation.
˜	 Disclosure of Board discussions and 

the resulting actions.

˜	 Our approach to ensuring long-term 

viability of the business.

˜	 Our approach to risk and mitigation.

Read the Corporate 
governance report on pages

22 

27

Taking a lead
Adopting the corporate governance 
practices that the Company will need in 
the future.

Managing risk
Assessing the risks facing the business and 
overseeing management’s strategies for 
mitigating these risks.

Engaging with shareholders
Ensuring shareholders are kept informed of 
the Company’s direction and achievements 
through regular contact.

Supporting management
Constructively challenging the team on its 
plans and delivery.

Introduction
After 15 years of effort, it has been 
immensely gratifying during 2016 to watch 
ENVIA’s plant rise from an empty plot 
outside Oklahoma City. This tangible result 
is, however, just the end of the beginning; 
the challenge for the next few years is 
to transform the Company from having 
started up one gas-to-liquids (GTL) plant 
incorporating its technology into a highly 
profitable business.

The Company has made significant 
progress during the year in charting 
a course to commercial success, 
and in this, David Pummell has been 
instrumental. The delivery of this strategy 
will dominate the efforts of Velocys 
over the coming years. 

Management and Board
David Pummell was appointed as CEO of 
Velocys in January 2016. He joined the 
Company with considerable experience 
to help us identify the right strategy and 
implement sustainable growth – skills 
that fit the Company’s current stage 
of commercialisation and the future 
direction of Velocys. His experience, ideas 
and approach are complementary to the 
Company’s senior management team 
– which remains a highly effective and 
able unit.

David is now focusing on how the 
Company needs to be reorganised and 
resourced to deliver our new strategy. 
I thank the management team and all 
the Company’s employees, for their 
efforts and achievements this year.

Jan Verloop retired as a Non-Executive 
Director in September 2016. The GTL 
expertise that Jan brought to the Board 
was pivotal in guiding the Company’s 
technology development from an innovative 
idea to a fully validated system. I thank him 
warmly for his ten years of valued service.

Mark Chatterji stepped down from his 
position as Non-Executive Director in April 
2017. The Board is grateful to Mark for his 
advice and support since his appointment 
in September 2015.

We look forward to welcoming Andrew 
Morris to the Board following the 
completion of the proposed fundraising 
(separately announced on 15 May 2017).

Strategy and markets
The review of Velocys’ strategy was 
a  thorough process involving considerable 
internal resource, independent advice 
and guidance, and a number of months 
of concerted effort. Many market 
opportunities were evaluated across 
various dimensions to assess their 
attractiveness and deliverability. 
As a result the Board has confidence that 
this is the right strategy to accelerate the 
Company’s entry into attractive and high 

growth markets, and to be the foundation 
for delivering revenue growth and achieving 
a sustainable cash generative business.

The funding environment in the oil 
and gas industry remains challenging. 
The Company’s strategy ensures it 
is best prepared to withstand the 
ongoing uncertainty in the sector. 
During the strategy’s implementation, 
partnerships and methods will be 
carefully chosen to reduce delivery risk 
and to make the integrated solution 
attractive to financing. 

Velocys’ fundraise in May 2017 of over 
£10m (subject to the passing of certain 
resolutions at a general meeting to be 
held in June 2017) together with cash 
brought forward (£18.7m at 2016 year 
end) and the measures taken to preserve 
cash will provide the Company with a 
financial platform for the important initial 
implementation phase of its strategy. The 
Board recognises that further funding will 
be needed in due course. Note 2 discusses 
uncertainties surrounding the extent and 
composition of future funding. 

Velocys is focusing on defined, high value 
markets with substantial short-term 
potential for volume growth; the market of 
most immediate focus is renewable fuels. 
There is increasing pressure from legislation 
and public opinion to curb greenhouse 
gas emissions and reduce pollution. 
This has led to long-standing incentives 
for renewable fuel production in certain 
regions, notably in the US. Congress and the 
new US administration are continuing to 
enforce laws and policies focused on energy 

Outlook
Velocys has a new focus, a differentiated 
technology, £10m of additional funding 
and a strategy for growth with which it 
is making good early progress. Despite 
a challenging funding environment and 
a persistently low oil price Velocys is 
developing a platform for delivery that 
should stand the Company in good stead 
as we move forward. The successful 
demonstration of the Company’s FT 
technology at ENVIA Oklahoma, the first 
smaller scale GTL plant in the world, 
will have significant, positive impact 
on this sector, not just this Company.  

Pierre Jungels, CBE
Chairman
15 May 2017

security and independence, including the 
renewable fuel standard, and jobs in rural 
regions. Successful delivery of the Velocys 
strategy would result in the construction of 
multiple, repeatable renewable fuels plants 
to meet this fundamental need. 

Currently, Group I base oil facilities are 
the largest source of supply for the global 
wax industry. Wax pricing has remained 
high, decoupled from the oil price, and 
is forecast to strengthen because these 
facilities, particularly in North America 
and Europe, are being shut down and 
replaced with newer facilities that do not 
co-produce wax. Plant economics remain 
favourable for smaller scale gas-to-wax 
projects that access low price feedstocks, 
including from certain stranded gas fields 
in North America. 

Our assessment of the focus markets 
is that they should provide attractive 
returns to both Velocys and its partners. 
We estimate that these combined markets 
have an addressable market size of 25-30 
plants in the next five years and that they 
have significant upside growth potential. 
Velocys’ business model is well positioned 
to exploit these opportunities and our goal 
is to build an integrated offer and secure 
the first final investment decision for 
a renewable fuels plant.

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    7

 
 
ENVIA Energy project overview
ENVIA Energy is a joint venture, of which Velocys is a member, formed to produce renewable 
fuels and chemicals from landfill gas and natural gas using GTL. ENVIA’s first plant, 
in Oklahoma City, will act as the commercial reference plant for Velocys’ technology.

Aerial view of ENVIA’s plant. 

Milestones achieved 
The historic moment for Velocys’ technology 
came in early February 2017, with the 
start-up of the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) 
process units and the first FT product was 
successfully produced; a truly momentous 
milestone for the Company. The performance 
data (for example, for syngas purity, 
methane selectivity, liquid production, 
carbon monoxide conversion and activity 
index) that are available from the ENVIA 
plant meet the performance expectations 
set using models based on laboratory and 
pilot studies. Targets for the conversion of 
syngas to FT products and the yield of liquid 
products were achieved within 12 hours 
of the first start-up of the FT modules (the 
equivalent of one shift of plant operators).

This achievement came at the end of a 
sustained period of activity at the Oklahoma 
City site, as well as at suppliers’ sites, 
during 2015 and 2016. Manufacture and 
certification of the Velocys FT reactors 
destined for use at ENVIA were completed 
by the Company’s supply chain partners in 
September 2015. From the spring of 2016 
the modular process units, the building 
blocks of the GTL plant, started to be 
delivered and set in place on site after being 
trucked from their fabrication facility near 
Houston, Texas. All other major packaged 
equipment skids, including the steam 
methane reformer, were delivered over the 
same time-frame. The number of personnel 
on site in Oklahoma peaked at over 150.

The lifeblood of the GTL process, the FT 
catalyst, made by a specialist manufacturer 
under contract to Velocys, was delivered 
to Oklahoma in September 2016. Velocys 
personnel were responsible for loading 
8    Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016

it into the reactors, which was duly 
accomplished with support from the 
Company’s internationally-recognised 
partner, Mourik.

In September, with the construction of the 
plant complete, the pre-commissioning 
and commissioning process could begin. 
All the lines and vessels were hydro-tested 
and a rigorous plant-wide inspection 
process was completed. In line with best 
practice, the process systems were started 
up in sequence when upstream units were 
confirmed to be working robustly and 
safely. In such a way ENVIA best assured 
a successful, safe and stable start-up.

Next steps 
At the time of writing, the operations team 
has completed debugging several (non-
Fischer-Tropsch) units of the plant and will 
implement the pre-planned programme of 
ramping up production to target operational 
capacity over the coming months. Such 
activities are routine at this stage of starting 
up a plant of this complexity. First finished 
products (waxes, diesel and naphtha) are 
likely to be produced in a matter of weeks. 
In parallel, we are starting to welcome key 
stakeholders to visit the plant and witness 
first-hand Velocys’ technology in situ. 

A large proportion of the products made 
at the plant is manufactured using landfill 
gas – a renewable resource. Under the 
Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) ENVIA 
has an approved pathway to generate RIN 
qualifying fuels. ENVIA expects to receive 
confirmation that the plant is operating as 
intended in the pathway, thus confirming the 
greenhouse gas reduction and the category 
of RIN credits generated. 

Increased operational control for Velocys
In January 2016, as part of a stakeholder 
capital contribution, Velocys made available 
to ENVIA additional funding of US$11.9m 
(made up of an equity contribution and 
a loan commitment). As a result of this 
funding arrangement, Velocys increased 
its ownership share and was awarded 
additional voting rights, taking its share of 
voting rights to 28%. We also sought and 
gained greater operational management 
involvement in the project (see note 20). 

Read more on page

17

Since that time Velocys has been 
supporting the Engineering, Procurement 
and Construction (EPC) contractor by, 
for example, providing an operability review, 
operating procedures and commissioning 
management. Additionally, under a 
secondment agreement with ENVIA, 
a Velocys operations team, which has 
worked under the ENVIA Plant Manager 
since July 2016, has brought essential 
support to the ENVIA team during 
commissioning, start-up and early stage 
operations. As planned, the majority of the 
Velocys team was demobilised in Q1 2017 as 
the permanent ENVIA operations team was 
phased in and fully trained. A small number 
of key Velocys staff are being seconded to 
ENVIA over a longer transition period and 
the wider Velocys team remains available to 
support ENVIA operations, as needed.

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t

G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

i

F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

The ENVIA plant and the East Oak landfill site in the foreground with downtown Oklahoma City just visible on the skyline (left). The plant is co-fed by landfill gas 
produced at the adjacent landfill site and pipeline natural gas. 

Fischer-Tropsch reactor manufacture at Velocys’ 
supply chain partner in 2015. 

Inside the control room.

Roger Harris in the tank farm.

From landfill gas to product offtake (foreground).

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    9

 
 
 
ENVIA Energy project overview (continued)

World-class operational expertise 
Members of the team talk about their previous experience and the Company’s 
involvement at the ENVIA plant.

Q

A

A

Q

A

Q

A

What previous experience did you 
bring to the ENVIA project?

“I have more than 10 years’ 
experience of the commercialisation 
of new chemical and large-scale 
GTL processes in countries such 
as South Africa and Qatar.”

Roger Harris
Senior Manager, Operations 
& Technology Commercialisation

“I have more than a decade of FT 
technology experience. I was the FT 
lead licensor for a commercial start-
up of a GTL plant in the Nigerian Delta 
with a capacity of over 30,000 barrels 
per day.”

Johan Malan
Commissioning Manager

What skills does the on-site Velocys 
team bring to the project?

“We’ve brought in a wide range of 
Velocys personnel. Our catalyst 
loading team successfully loaded 
the commercial FT reactors on 
site. We’ve also taken a team 
of experienced people from our 
R&D teams and our pilot plant 
and seconded them to the ENVIA 
operations team. These people 
come with a wealth of experience in 
the development of our technology 
and most of them were involved in 
Velocys’ demonstration-scale plants 
such as at one of Petrobras’ sites 
in Brazil. We’ve also pulled together 
a highly experienced and motivated 
commissioning and start-up team.”

Roger Harris

What is involved during the 
commissioning of a plant such  
as this?

“Commissioning is all about the 
details and executing activities in 
a carefully pre-planned sequence 
to ensure safe and optimal 
progress. Every line needs to be 
flushed and blown down, every 
instrument loop checked and every 
unit prepared according to the 
vendor’s specifications to ensure 
a successful start-up. The steps 
that have to be undertaken are very 
similar for any GTL plant, whether 
large or small- scale.”

Johan Malan

Q

A

Q

A

A

Q

A

How did the joint venture prepare for 
the start-up of the plant?

“The team made extensive and 
detailed preparations for start-up; 
operating manuals and procedures 
have been fully completed and 
robust commissioning and  
start-up plans put in place.” 

Johan Malan

Why is the project in Oklahoma City 
so significant?

“First product at ENVIA represented 
a huge milestone for Velocys as 
well as a significant step for ENVIA 
and the wider industry. It will be 
a springboard for the successful 
implementation of Velocys’ new 
strategy, in particular demonstrating 
to potential partners the credibility 
of our technology, people and 
selected routes to markets.”

David Pummell 
CEO

“Successful operation will provide 
commercial-scale performance 
data for stakeholders to analyse 
and a physical, tangible site where 
they can see our technology in situ. 
It’s an impressive site and plant 
performance data that have been 
collected are aligned with our pilot 
plant data and process models.” 

Paul Schubert
COO

Will the Oklahoma City project lead to 
future projects with ENVIA?

“The Oklahoma City plant is a 
commercial demonstration of our 
technology and will confirm that 
landfill gas can be converted to 
high value products. There are 
significant opportunities at landfills 
across the US to leverage the 
Oklahoma experience with our 
partners. ENVIA has been evaluating 
how to best use the learnings 
from Oklahoma and put the right 
plans in place for future projects.” 

David Pummell

A wealth of experience on site from Velocys’ R&D 
and pilot plant teams and from personnel with 
experience at large-scale commercial GTL plants.

www.velocys.com/media_videopage15_ENVIA_OKC.php

View a video about Velocys’ involvement in ENVIA’s plant and the 
significance of the project to the Company.

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    11

Some of the Fischer-Tropsch modules including those incorporating the Velocys Fischer-Tropsch reactors (right).

Paul Schubert (COO) and David Pummell (CEO) take a tour of the site with Johan Malan (Commissioning Manager).

10    Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t

G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

i

F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

 
 
David Pummell
Chief Executive Officer

Developing a platform for growth

˜	 First product achieved at ENVIA 

(February 2017).

˜	 Commercial scale validation of 

our technology.

˜	 World-class operational 
expertise demonstrated.
˜	 Definition of new Company 

strategy and good early progress 
with its implementation.

˜	 Fundraise in Q2 2017 provides 

funding for immediate 
strategy initiatives.

CEO’s report

Introduction
Looking back on my first year as CEO of 
Velocys I see that my initial optimism about 
the Company was well-founded. Velocys 
has a proven and uniquely competitive 
technology, employs a dedicated and 
knowledgeable workforce, and, with first 
Fischer-Tropsch product achieved at 
ENVIA Oklahoma City, we have a market 
leading position. 

2016 has been a year of establishing 
a platform for Velocys’ future growth. 
I have been enormously impressed with 
the advances made month-by-month by 
the high-performing on-site team at the 
ENVIA plant, and first product has now 
been achieved. Building on that position, 
our strategy has defined Velocys’ future 
direction and the recent fundraise maintains 
our financial position so that we can start to 
implement the entry into our focus markets, 
with an initial focus on renewable fuels 
in the US.

Commercial strategy
My approach to management is 
continuously to drive simplicity, focus, 
delivery and robustness in everything we 
do. We took this approach to the strategy 
review carried out in 2016, and will continue 
to follow this path through every aspect of 
its roll out. The new strategy builds on the 
Company’s successes to date, but adopts 
a business model in which we aim to 
considerably extend our influence over the 
integrated offer, project delivery and partner 
selection in specific high value markets that 
will enable us to grow the business in those 
areas identified in the strategy review.

12    Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016

A core theme of the new business model is to 
develop, jointly with partners, an integrated 
offer to customers in each market. Together, 
we are assembling all the necessary 
components for projects, including the 
integration of other licensors’ technologies, 
to develop cost effective and operationally-
ready plants, which are fully financed with 
feedstock and offtake agreements, and 
which could be deployed across multiple 
plants. This approach aims to create 
repeatable and scalable standard offers 
in each of our focus markets and starting 
with the renewable fuels market, to drive 
us towards establishing material market 
positions.

We will continue to refine our strategy as 
progress is made on the renewable fuels 
integrated offer. The Board is examining 
options to provide funding beyond the 
immediate strategy initiatives. 

Velocys is committed to its technology 
and invests prudently in preliminary 
stage project engineering and project 
management to accelerate the route to 
market. This committed approach by 
Velocys is intended to be highly attractive 
to potential future strategic partners who 
would invest significant capital in these 
plants in due course. These early project 
investments would be converted into minor 
equity positions, as Velocys does not plan to 
take substantial equity stakes in projects 
incorporating its technology.

Focus markets 
We have identified attractive markets on 
which Velocys will now focus to create 
sustainable high-growth businesses in 
the medium term. More details are given 
on page 4. We are developing alliances 
with companies that have the resources, 
scale and capabilities to support Velocys in 
accessing these markets and driving growth. 

Strategy milestones reached
In Q1 2017 we announced the signing of 
commercial agreements with two strategic 
partners. TRI and Morimatsu are our 
partners for gasification technology and 
modularisation and fabrication engineering 
respectively. Both companies are innovative 
leaders in their fields and have committed 
significant resources to joint work 
programmes that are already underway. 

Relentlessly driving to the most cost effective 
integrated plant offer is a cornerstone of our 
strategy. Key enablers are the modularisation 
of plants, routes to high quality and low 
cost fabrication, sourcing of equipment 
from the most competitive suppliers and 
the continuous improvement of plant 
integration engineering. This approach drives 
down capex and opex and also reduces 
the plant build schedule and risk of delays. 
With Morimatsu's, we are scoping out a 
programme of work to maximise these 
benefits across all gas-to-liquids (GTL) 
and biomass-to-liquids (BTL) plants. This 
ongoing collaboration builds on Morimatsu’s 
successful delivery of targeted cost and 
footprint reductions in their design of the 
Fischer-Tropsch (FT) section of the plant. 

With TRI we have begun the development 
of a joint engineering design for a BTL plant 
incorporating Velocys’ FT technology with 
TRI’s proven gasification technology to 
produce renewable diesel and jet fuel from 
woody biomass. TRI has agreed to support 
Velocys and its partners to further optimise 
overall plant costs and the financing of 
BTL plants through, for example, accessing 
governmental loan guarantee schemes 
and grants that would play a key role in  
de-risking the financing of the first BTL plant. 

The commercial team is maintaining its 
efforts to build the consortium of partners 
that, we believe, will underpin a financial 
investment decision (FID) for a renewable 
fuels plant next year. There is a long way to 
go but I’m encouraged by the very positive 
engagement of potential partners who 
express the belief that we represent a 
credible route to building many plants 
in our chosen markets. 

ENVIA Energy
The plant in Oklahoma City is the first 
commercial smaller scale GTL plant in the 
world. There was intense activity on site 
throughout 2016; the milestones achieved 
during the year are outlined on page 8. 
The first product milestone is as much a 
landmark event for the industry as it is for 
Velocys and ENVIA. At the time of writing, 
the operations team has completed 
debugging several (non-Fischer-Tropsch) 
units of the plant and will implement the 
pre-planned programme of ramping up 
production to target operational capacity 
over the coming months. Such activities are 
routine at this stage of starting up a plant 
of this complexity. First finished products 
(waxes, diesel and naphtha) are likely to be 
produced in a matter of weeks. In parallel, 
we are starting to welcome key stakeholders 
to visit the plant and witness first-hand 
Velocys’ technology in situ. 

We are delighted that the commissioning 
team delivered a safe and successful  
start-up of the FT modules and upstream 
units during a challenging period of 
exceptionally cold weather. There is a 
highly competent and experienced team 
on site that gets on with whatever needs 
to be done, solving the challenges that 
typically arise during the commissioning 
of a plant in the most professional way. 
My thanks go to the entire team, whose 
continued efforts have been instrumental 
in achieving this milestone.

In January 2016, Velocys made available 
to ENVIA additional funding of US$11.9m 
(made up of an equity contribution and 
loan commitment). Additional equity 
ownership and voting rights were granted to 
the Company and Velocys secured greater 
operational management involvement in the 
project. Through that increased involvement 
we have built on our market-leading 
technology base, enhancing our capabilities 
and strengthening our position as a Company 
with real-world operational capability. 

Construction, commissioning and start-
up of ENVIA’s plant have naturally brought 
many learning points that Velocys will use 
in future projects. These include plant-wide 
integration design improvements that will 
increase the efficiency and economics of 
future GTL plants.

The culmination of 15 years of incredible 
endeavour by Velocys has been realised 
at ENVIA Oklahoma City, the first smaller 
scale GTL plant in the world, where we have 
proven our technology and demonstrated 
our operational capabilities. We believe 
this will provide a firm foundation for 
growing the business at pace in our 
chosen strategic markets. We have a 
differentiated technology and we are 
now creating routes to market that 
will enable us to build material market 
positions. This is attracting considerable 
interest from world class potential 
partners and we are actively engaged 
in commercial discussions.”

Other projects
As previously reported, in the first half of 
2016 Velocys investigated the potential 
acquisition of certain GTL assets of a  
US-based company that was in bankruptcy 
proceedings. However, it emerged that the 
deal available to Velocys was not in the 
Company’s best interests and so it was 
not pursued to completion. 

Velocys is keeping its options open regarding 
its Ashtabula site. The Company currently 
sees Western Canada as a promising 
location for a first gas-to-wax plant, 
where there is an abundance of stranded 
gas. Much of the work undertaken for the 
Ashtabula project (partners, engineering 
and knowledge of wax market dynamics) 
is entirely transferable to a wax plant of 
the same size at a different location.

Velocys will continue to license its technology 
to third party projects. A number of projects 
in Velocys’ sales pipeline have continued to 
progress during 2016, albeit slower than 
we would have liked. Operation of ENVIA’s 
plant is expected to accelerate some of 
these opportunities and stimulate the 
development of other third-party projects 
as well as those in our strategic markets. 

The opportunity with a major fuels player 
in the US remains active; the air permit 
was issued for the plant in the summer 
of 2016. Red Rock Biofuels is still pursuing 
funding for its biomass-to-liquids plant 
of over 1,100 barrels per day (bpd) using 
forestry waste as feedstock in Oregon, USA. 
The funding process is taking longer than 
expected but Red Rock remains focused on 
achieving final investment decision this year. 

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t

G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

i

F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Two engineering studies were completed by 
Velocys and its project partners in 2016: 
˜	A project being developed on behalf of 
a national gas company in Central Asia 
that is seeking to develop its stranded 
gas reserves. Velocys’ project partner is 
waiting for confirmation on the feedback 
from the project sponsor. 

˜	The development of a waste-to-liquids 
project in the UK to produce jet fuel. 
Velocys is reviewing options with 
potential partners. 

Pilot plant and technology
One of our most significant assets, 
the Velocys pilot plant, was put into 
standby mode in Q2 2016 following the 
completion of a comprehensive testing 
programme. Later this year we plan to 
relocate the skid-mounted FT section 
of the pilot plant from Ohio to TRI’s facility 
in Durham, North Carolina, where it will 
form part of an integrated gasification/FT 
technology demonstration. This will provide 
additional assurances to prospective project 
investors and lenders for BTL plants, and 
is a requirement for the US Department 
of Agriculture loan guarantee qualification. 

Also in 2016, a third-party independent 
engineering firm validated Velocys’ design 
for larger 700 bpd FT reactors, use of which 
will substantially reduce the costs of larger 
plants. This positions Velocys well to respond 
cost-effectively to the needs of customers 
developing projects with plant capacities 
towards the upper end of its target range.

Outlook
In 2016 we developed a strategy for our 
sustainable future growth and we have 
made a fair start to 2017. Visitors to the 
Oklahoma City site, many of them potential 
partners, are struck by the physical reality 
of this achievement and are leaving with 
a real sense of the calibre of the team on 
the ground, and the significant potential of 
Velocys’ technology and strategic business 
model. We have two priorities for 2017: firstly 
the implementation of the strategy, with 
focus on setting up the strategic consortium 
for the renewable fuels market that will 
aim to deliver multiple FIDs, operating 
plants and associated revenues in the 
coming years; and secondly, supporting the 
ENVIA team to achieve stable, full-capacity 
production with US federal renewable fuel 
credit qualification.

David Pummell
Chief Executive Officer
15 May 2017

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    13

 
 
Our technology
Velocys’ technology is specifically designed for smaller scale 
gas-to-liquids (GTL) and biomass-to-liquids (BTL), combining 
super-active catalysts with intensified reactor systems. 
The technology is protected by several hundred patents 
in over 30 countries. Standardised modular plants can 
be deployed readily in a wide range of locations.

Cost-competitive, proven technology
Velocys is recognised as the technology 
market leader. Our Fischer-Tropsch (FT) 
technology has been tested for 1.3 million 
hours in the laboratory and for over 
26,000 hours at pilot/demonstration scale. 
It is operationally ready and has now 
been deployed commercially at ENVIA’s 
Oklahoma City plant. 

Particularly in today’s oil price environment, 
asset owners and project developers 
need to select a technology that allows 
them to achieve the best possible 
economic returns from their plant. Our FT 
reactor and catalyst system delivers 
high conversion efficiencies and yields 
of valuable, premium grade products. 
This increases the revenues that can be 
derived from a plant with a given input, 
enabling plant operators to penetrate 
markets (e.g.  for high-value waxes) that 
would otherwise be inaccessible, and 
insulating projects from oil price volatility. 

Use of Velocys’ high stability catalyst 
results in an increased plant up-time. 
Velocys’ customers can expect to use each 
batch of catalyst for at least two years, and 
potentially much longer, before change-out. 

Velocys technology is robust, and 
optimised not only for peak performance 
but also to meet the challenges of everyday 
variations in, for example, feedstock 
composition. All the protocols required 
to operate a commercial plant have 
been demonstrated. 

We maintain a targeted investment 
programme in engineering and technology 
know-how, to further optimise the 
technology and integrated plant design, 
and to improve the financial performance 
of GTL and BTL plants.

Capabilities in partnership
Working with strong partners that 
have complementary capabilities is 
contributing significantly to our aim 
of offering the most cost effective FT 
and fully integrated plant solution 
in our target markets. This extended 
capability through partnership will enable 
continued optimisation, standardisation 
and modularisation of plant engineering 
that will be the foundation for delivering 
multiple, repeatable plants.

Velocys FT reactor cores.

One of Velocys' completed four-core FT reactors.

Revenue streams from technology sales
Revenues for Velocys will predominately flow from licensing its technology, initial sales of its reactors and 
catalyst, and ongoing sales of its catalyst (approximately every two years) throughout the lifetime of a plant. 

Key: 

Catalyst revenue

Reactor sales

Licensing fees

Project development cost/
investment

Returns from project

Cumulative (licensing, 
catalyst and reactor sales)

Cumulative 
(all revenue streams)

e
l
i
f
o
r
p
e
u
n
e
v
e
r
e
v
i
t
a
c
i
d
n
I

t
c
e
j
o
r
p
e
l
g
n
i
s
a
m
o
r
f

0

14    Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016

Years

-2
-1
Engineering 
phase

1

0
Construction 
phase

3
2
Operating 
phase

4

5

6

7

8

Revenues as 
per years 7 and 
8 for remaining 
lifetime of plant 
(20 years)

Beyond final investment decision (FID)

Processes
The GTL and BTL processes 
have three main steps: 
production of syngas, the 
Fischer-Tropsch (FT) process 
and subsequent upgrading 
to produce finished products: 
high quality diesel, jet fuel and 
speciality products as well 
as naphtha.

Products
Fuels 
With the demand for diesel 
and jet fuel increasing, BTL 
can provide the renewable 
fuels that the US commodity 
market demands, and for 
which attractive incentivisation 
schemes have been created 
through both federal and 
state credits. FT fuels are 
fully compatible with existing 
infrastructure and engines, 
which is not the case for 
other methods of natural gas 
monetisation (LNG and CNG) 
or other methods of producing 
fuels from biomass (such as 
ethanol or fatty acid esters). 

FT products are highly 
paraffinic and do not contain 
aromatics or sulphur. FT 
fuels burn cleaner than 
petroleum-derived fuels, 
resulting in lower emissions 
of NOx, SOx and particulates. 
Use of high-purity FT diesel 
also reduces engine noise 
and reduces wear and tear 
on vital engine components. 
FT fuels are often blended to 
instil their high performance 
(high Cetane) characteristics 
into lower quality petroleum-
derived fuels.

Waxes
The purity and consistency of 
FT waxes is highly desirable 
in downstream processes, 
such as the production of 
cosmetics, pharmaceuticals 
and adhesives.

There is a rising global demand 
for waxes, though the wax 
market, both in the US and 
worldwide, continues to 
undergo structural changes, 
which have decreased supply 
and decoupled wax pricing 
from the oil price, making 
a smaller scale GTL plant 
targeting the production of 
waxes an attractive proposition. 
Velocys is best placed to take 
advantage of this opportunity. 
Our technology is best-in-class 
in terms of yield of long chain 
hydrocarbons, which form the 
basis of high value, premium 
wax products.

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t

G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

i

F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Gas-to-liquids

Biomass-to-liquids

Natural 
gas

or

Landfill 
gas

or

Biomass

Reformer

or

Gasifier

Syngas generation
The production of synthesis 
gas (syngas), an optimised 
mixture of carbon monoxide 
and hydrogen, by reforming 
natural gas or landfill gas, or 
by gasification of biomass.

Syngas

The Velocys
Fischer-Tropsch
 process

Raw FT 
product

Upgrading

The Fischer-Tropsch 
process
The FT process converts 
the syngas into paraffinic 
hydrocarbons. Velocys’ 
technology addresses this 
stage of the process.

Upgrading
Upgrading to produce 
finished products such as 
high-value, premium quality 
waxes, diesel and jet fuel, 
as well as naphtha.

Waxes

Diesel

Jet fuel

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    15

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Susan Robertson
Chief Financial Officer

The fundraise in Q2 2017 
together with cash brought 
forward (£18.7m at 2016 year 
end) provide the Company with 
a financial platform for the 
important initial implementation 
phase of its drive towards 
commercialisation.”

Financial review

Environment
Velocys is careful to monitor the 
environmental impact of its operations. 
Air travel and buildings operation have been 
identified as two of the major factors in the 
Company’s CO2 emissions. 

In 2016 air travel on the Company’s behalf 
contributed 467t of CO2 (2015: 497t). This 
equates to 5.2t per employee (2015: 4.6t). 
The proportion of air travel that was between 
the Company’s offices in Oxfordshire, Ohio 
and Texas was 54% (2015: 51%); 8% of the 
emissions arose from travel to the site of 
ENVIA’s plant in Oklahoma.

Emissions attributable to operation of its 
three sites included 769t from consumption 
of electricity (2015: 1,042t). The reduction 
was due to the Company signing up to plans 
from providers with an energy mix that 
favoured renewables and relied less on coal 
as a source of power. Emissions attributable 
to the consumption of gas were 436t (2015: 
1,137t). This reduction was mainly due 
to having put the Velocys pilot plant into 
standby mode in Q2 of 2016.

Key performance 
indicators (KPIs)

Aside from the financial results outlined 
on pages 16-17 KPIs for the business are 
changing as a result of the strategy review. 
Most will be focused towards the delivery 
of the strategy although there will also 
be some underlying indicators such as 
technology robustness, supply chain and 
the Company’s expertise and resources. 
The performance of the Company is 
expanded upon in the CEO’s report on 
pages 12-13.

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t

G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

i

F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

in H1 and H2 respectively. This imbalance 
was a result of the measures taken to 
preserve cash as well as the exceptional 
net expense of £2.4m it incurred in H1 
in its pursuit of acquiring certain US 
GTL assets in administration (see note 
4). This reduced underlying cost base 
has been carried forward into 2017 and 
the Company intends to continue taking 
measures to minimise its underlying cost 
base whilst continuing to spend prudently 
on strategy implementation. 

The very large swing in the sterling to US 
dollar exchange rate in the wake of the 
UK’s vote to leave the European Union 
gave rise to a £3.2m gain, recorded in 
Finance income in the Income statement. 
This reflected revaluation of the Company’s 
dollar cash assets, and maturity of its 
forward foreign exchange contracts (see 
note 27). A further gain of £7.3m due to the 
translation of non-cash, US denominated 
assets was recorded through reserves. 

ENVIA funding
In January 2016 Velocys made available 
$11.9m to ENVIA, which was made up of 
a $2.6m equity contribution and a $9.3m 
loan commitment. $0.4m of the loan had 
been drawn down by ENVIA by the end of 
2016 and it is anticipated that the entirety 
of the remaining loan amount will be drawn 
down in H1 2017. The loan has a 10% 
coupon. In May 2017 Velocys extended 
its loan agreement with ENVIA to $12.7m 
(see below). 

Fundraise
In May 2017 Velocys secured additional 
funding of over £10m (before expenses 
and subject to the passing of certain 
resolutions at a general meeting to be 
held shortly). This included convertible 
loan notes as well as a placing of new 
ordinary shares.

Proceeds from the fundraise will be used to 
fund working capital during the first phase 
of strategy implementation, particularly 
in the renewable fuels focus area, as well 
as the following activities to support the 
development of the integrated plant offer 
in that focus market:
˜	 Initial engineering for US biomass-to-

liquid (BTL) plants.

˜	 Integrated technology demonstration 

for BTL.

˜	 Project development activities (site 

selection, permitting).

˜	 Consultants and financing (US 
sponsored programmes etc.).

The proceeds of the fundraise will also 
be used to maintain sufficient financial 
resources to support ENVIA’s early 
operations over the coming few months.

Future funding 
The financial statements have been 
prepared on the going concern basis, 
which assumes that the Company will 
have sufficient funds available to enable 
it to continue to trade for the foreseeable 
future. Management’s financial forecasts 
of the Company’s likely cash requirements 
include the following assumptions: (i) 
the Oklahoma City project reaching full 
operational capacity in 2017 (ii) the costs 
of ongoing development projects and the 
Company’s ability to reduce certain overhead 
costs (iii) the Company raising additional 
funding during 2018. These assumptions are 
discussed further in note 2. 

Susan Robertson
Chief Financial Officer
15 May 2017

Corporate social 
responsibility

Employees
Velocys is committed to being a good 
employer and endeavours to train staff 
well, to pay them fairly and to maintain a 
safe environment in which they can work. 
Velocys is committed to equal opportunity 
for all its employees. Of the 76 people 
working for Velocys at 31 December 
2016, 33% were women (2015: 31%). 
The proportion has increased from a quarter 
to a third in the last two years. In 2016 two of 
the eight members of the Board were women 
(2015: two of nine members). The percentage 
of female employees broken down by areas 
of the business was as follows.

2016 2015

Scientific & engineering

26% 25%

Sales, finance, HR & admin

56% 55%

Senior managers

29% 33%

Velocys keeps detailed environmental, 
health, and safety records and takes the 
safety and well-being of its employees very 
seriously. As an example, the Columbus, 
Ohio site successfully renewed its US 
Department of Labor Occupational Safety 
and Health Administration certification as 
meeting the requirements of its Consultation 
Safety and Health Recognition Program for 
an additional three years. This programme 
is a forward-looking, active-prevention 
safety programme requiring participation 
from highest management through all tiers 
of employees working at a site. During 2016 
there were no Lost-Time Accidents (LTA) 
across the Company’s sites, which took 
the total number of operating labour hours 
without such an accident to over 2.8m.

Revenues
Revenue in 2016 was £1.4m (2015: £2.0m), 
which was entirely made up of service 
income from a number of engineering 
design studies and operational support 
services, including the secondment of 
employees to ENVIA’s plant. This was 
in line with budget expectations. Gross 
margin was £0.4m (2015: £0.7m).

There was one key contract, with ENVIA. 
Revenue for reactor sales to ENVIA was 
recognised in 2015, while revenue from the 
lease of catalyst to ENVIA will start to be 
recognised in the financial results for H1 
2017. Velocys expects to receive additional 
revenue from ENVIA from the change-out of 
its catalyst approximately every two years.

Expenses and income
Total administrative expenses decreased 
to £17.4m before exceptional items and 
£20.2m after exceptional items (2015: 
£25.5m before/£26.7m after exceptional 
items). The reduction reflected placing 
the Velocys pilot plant into standby mode, 
scaling back external project development 
spending and rigorous cost reduction 
across the Company, while it aimed to 
secure additional project revenues. In 
selecting measures to adopt, a primary 
concern of the Company has been to 
ensure that they will not impact Velocys’ 
ability to deliver its commitments at 
ENVIA nor its core capabilities.

Other income of £0.3m before exceptional 
items (£2.8m after exceptional items – see 
below), was from a legal settlement (2015: 
£2.0m/£3.8m before/after exceptional 
items) (see note 9).

The exceptional items in 2016 included 
costs incurred during the pursuit of 
an opportunity to acquire certain gas-
to-liquids (GTL) assets of a US-based 
company in administration, and the release 
of deferred revenue on the cancellation 
of the Ventech contract. The exceptional 
items in 2015 included the full impairment 
of the discounted value of expected future 
income upon obtaining a final investment 
decision for the Ashtabula project 
and release of deferred consideration. 
See note 4. 

Assets and cash
Net assets of the Company were £63.7m, 
down from £68.5m in 2015; the main 
change was due to the cash outflow 
offset by the impact of the stronger US 
dollar exchange rate on the Company’s US 
denominated assets. Having experienced 
a reduced spend in H2, Velocys retained a 
cash balance (cash and cash equivalents) 
at year end totalling £18.7m (2015: £37.7m), 
which has been subsequently increased 
with the addition of over £10m from the 
fundraise in May 2017 (see below).

Cash outflow in 2016 (excluding share 
issues) was £19.0m (2015: £22.0m). 
Cash outflow was £13.6m and £5.4m 

16    Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    17

 
 
 
Risks and mitigation
The principal risks and uncertainties that are considered to have a potentially 
material impact on the Company’s long-term performance and achievement 
of its strategy are set out in the following table. 

Business influences

2

Risk description and impact

Operating risks

Performance of Velocys’ technology

Velocys’ core technology may not produce the quantity 
and/or quality of product expected.

Supporting technologies at a gas-to-liquids (GTL) plant 
may not operate according to specification, preventing 
the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) section of a plant from 
functioning optimally.

Inexpert operation of the plant may produce poorer 
than predicted performance.

Performance of integrated technology offer for 
biomass-to-liquids (BTL) plants
Technology, such as syngas production or upgrading, 
supplied by other licensors, may not function as hoped.

Incorrect operation of other licensors’ technologies could 
cause the plant to fail, or to operate sub-optimally.

Business 
influences

Risk management strategy

The Company rigorously tests its technology in the lab and 
pilot plant, modelling client-specific and upset conditions. 
A robust quality assurance programme is followed for the 
supply of commercial catalyst and reactors.

The performance of the ENVIA plant observed to date 
indicates that the core technology is operating well and 
that it meets performance expectations according to 
models based on lab and pilot studies. Current activities at 
ENVIA involve debugging and debottlenecking, as is routine 
at this stage of start-up. Performance at ENVIA will be a 
good indicator of performance at other plants. 

Velocys works closely with plant operators on plant 
integration issues, including the protection of Velocys’ 
FT technology from potential malfunctions in upstream 
units. ENVIA has operated the other sections of the plant 
in a mode that would have identified major problems 
with the supporting systems if they were present. 
No major problems were discovered. Risks remaining 
include, for example, vibration in pumps at high capacity, 
and insufficient heat within a specific vessel or pipe. 
Resolutions to these types of issues are straightforward 
(such as adding an auxiliary heater) and do not require 
modifications to the basic technology or discovery of 
new methodologies. A similar process is anticipated at 
other plants.

The Velocys team, which has been pivotal in the 
commissioning and start-up of the ENVIA plant, includes 
employees that have been at all of Velocys’ field trials, 
and personnel that participated in the commissioning 
and start-up of large scale GTL plants in South Africa, 
Qatar and Nigeria. This expertise has been transferred to 
the plant operators through Velocys’ involvement in writing 
operating manuals and providing training. A small number 
of key Velocys personnel will remain seconded to ENVIA for 
much of 2017 and Velocys’ personnel will be available to 
ENVIA for consultation over a longer time frame. A similar 
arrangement will be offered to operators of future plants. 

When selecting partners Velocys will continue to work with 
technology companies that have proven track records of 
commercial operation.

Velocys and its new partner TRI are collaborating on a joint 
technology demonstration to reduce the technology integration 
and plant financing risks associated with the development of 
a BTL plant.

Risk description and impact

Operating risks (continued)

Health, safety and/or environment issues at a plant
An accident or other incident might occur at a plant 
incorporating Velocys’ technology, resulting in injury to 
personnel or their exposure to hazardous conditions.

An environmental incident might occur at a plant; 
emissions could exceed the permitted level. 

Loss of intellectual property (IP) protection
Velocys’ IP could be copied or infringed.

Velocys’ IP could be threatened by an attack on its 
IT systems.

Supply chain 
The supply chain may not be able to deliver reactors and 
catalyst on a timescale to meet customers’ expectations.

Employee retention and recruitment

Velocys may not be able to scale the organisation to 
deliver the integrated offer.

Velocys may lose key personnel that are needed to 
support, for example, the start-up of commercial 
plants or supply chain delivery.

1. Technical expertise

2. Commercial growth

3. Development of an integrated offer

4.  Focus markets

Business 
influences

Risk management strategy

The Company has an excellent in-house safety record. 
All employees are properly trained according to OSHA 
requirements for handling hazardous substances. Automatic 
trips and alarms are incorporated in plant designs to minimise 
the risk of such conditions arising. Having produced many of 
the training materials and operating manuals for the ENVIA 
plant, and gained operational experience on site, Velocys will 
aim to ensure that best operating practice is always adopted 
by plant owners. However, this is not within Velocys’ control, 
and so Velocys’ contracts state that it shall not be liable to 
licensees for environmental, toxic waste, hazardous waste 
or pollution liability.

The ENVIA plant has been designed to account for expected 
upset conditions and operate well within the emissions 
restrictions. Plant personnel are trained in proper operating 
procedures and to identify issues that could lead to an 
environmental situation developing and to act accordingly. This 
would be replicated at other plants. Other measures as above.

Velocys actively manages its intellectual property, with 
several hundred patents currently held in around 30 
countries. The Company has demonstrated its ability and 
ongoing determination to defend this portfolio through the 
courts, resulting in favourable settlements. 

The Company has an email management system that 
stops malicious email from being delivered, and training 
programmes are in place to enable employees to identify 
threats from such emails. A security solution is in place to 
automatically detect and neutralise malware. To secure 
data at rest, Velocys uses encrypted drives in all mobile 
devices that leave its premises. The Company uses security 
appliances to protect the network from intrusion and 
hard security measures to prevent unauthorised physical 
access to servers.

Velocys has longstanding relationships with its vendors 
for reactors, reactor components, and catalyst. The 
manufacturing methodologies are part of Velocys’ IP. 
If one of the suppliers was unable to execute the process, 
or deliver certain orders in a timely way, supply could be 
transferred to another vendor.

Velocys provides competitive compensation to attract and 
retain staff.

The Company chose to locate its engineering and 
commercial teams in Houston, and so is well placed to 
access a large pool of oil and gas industry expertise. 

Velocys does all it can to retain its talented staff in 
all aspects of FT and GTL technology and operations. 
Plant operating manuals and training documentation, 
plant design and reactor and catalyst builds are all well 
documented, which would allow knowledge retention 
should employees leave the Company. Any modifications 
to manufacturing protocols are added to the archive.

18    Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    19

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsRisks and mitigation (continued)

Business influences

2

Risk description and impact

Strategic risks

Commercial offering
Velocys may not be able to create or scale its 
integrated offer due, for example, to the inability 
to secure the key commercial partnerships or to 
successfully manage multiple partnerships in parallel.

The reference plant does not continue to operate
As Velocys is a minority partner in ENVIA the Company 
is reliant on the other partners and their continued 
involvement in the continued operation of the plant. 
If they should choose to discontinue the operation 
of the ENVIA plant this would limit the amount of 
operating data that is available to Velocys. 

Market risks

Low oil prices
Oil prices could track the US Energy Information 
Administration’s (EIA’s) reference case of an oil price 
(of West Texas Intermediate, WTI of $57 in 2018).

Business 
influences

Risk management strategy

Velocys is actively investing to maintain its competitive 
advantage, and to be seen as the natural choice for 
companies seeking partners in its field. The Company is 
in discussion with a range of potential partners, each of 
whom appears to have a clear motivation for involvement 
in the integrated offer/market segment. Velocys is 
recruiting into its commercial team new members of 
staff with relevant skills and experience to enhance its 
ability to connect and negotiate with these partners at 
the highest level.

The current economic projections show positive cash flow 
for the plant, justifying its continued operation. Velocys, as 
a shareholder and the provider of loan note funding, has 
the ability to influence such a decision. The on-site team 
has been building a comprehensive data set on operational 
performance from the start-up of each process unit, 
including the performance of the FT process.

Velocys’ strategy review in 2016 identified high growth 
potential in target markets at current oil prices. These 
involve exploiting low cost feedstocks, producing premium 
products (including waxes, the price of which is decoupled 
from the oil price), and addressing local regulations, e.g., 
related to gas flaring.

Oil prices could track the EIA low oil price case 
(WTI $23 in 2018).

At oil prices in the US$20-30 range, the range of economic 
projects is smaller, but the same factors apply. 

Future of renewable fuels credits
Renewable fuels credits (the Renewable Fuel Standard, 
RFS) could be withdrawn at a federal level in the US.

Renewable fuels credits could be withdrawn 
in California. 

The RFS is important to many States with large agricultural 
economies, to energy security, and to jobs. Velocys engages 
actively with law makers in Washington and works with 
industry bodies to ensure its voice is heard. The other 
market on which Velocys is focussing in the near term,  
gas-to-wax plants in Canada, indicates attractive 
economics and is not reliant on renewable fuels credits. 

Withdrawal of the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) is 
unlikely; California is proposing to expand this programme. 
Carbon pricing is stable in California and the State 
is considering extension of the mandate for carbon 
reductions. Velocys engages actively with California 
regulators, through industry groups, to ensure its 
voice is heard.

Risk description and impact

Market risks (continued)

Competing technology

Existing technologies that are economically-competitive 
with Velocys technology in specific niche applications 
could be fully commercialised. Competing technologies 
are indeed approaching commercialisation. However, the 
Company believes that the market is large enough so 
that there is room for multiple suppliers.

New technologies could be developed that compete 
with Velocys’ technology. The time required to take 
newly-developed technology at the lab scale and move 
it through pilot, demonstration scale, and then first 
commercial reference plant is generally in excess of 
10 years.

Brexit
There is uncertainty around the impact of the UK leaving 
the European Union.

1. Technical expertise

2. Commercial growth

3. Development of an integrated offer

4.  Focus markets

Business 
influences

Risk management strategy

Velocys continues to invest in R&D, to improve catalyst 
productivity and the efficiency of the reactor system. In 
2016 it invested over £10 million in its R&D programmes 
(including associated staff costs).

Velocys continues to invest significant effort into 
comprehensive plant integration optimisation, with the aim 
of significant reductions in cost on a per barrel basis. Such 
advances take time to develop and provide Velocys with a 
significant competitive advantage beyond its core Fischer-
Tropsch technology capability. 

Optimisation of the current generation of plant technology 
is being carried out by Velocys and the Company continues 
to invest in new technology and technology evaluation. 
For example, the Company is working with a technology 
licensor to jointly develop an integrated GTL solution 
suitable to reduce the flaring of associated gas offshore.

Velocys does not expect to have significant exposure 
to the European market in the short and medium terms. 
The main impact is likely to be felt through fluctuations 
in exchange rates.

Financial risks 
The potentially material financial risks associated with a multinational business, including foreign exchange are presented below.  
All other financial risks assessed by the Company are included in note 28.

Financing
The Company’s cash usage is significant versus 
prospective future cashflows (particularly in the short 
term) and Velocys is reliant on the support of a small 
group of major shareholders. The timing of cashflows is 
difficult to predict given the Company’s nascent strategy. 

Project finance may not be secured for plants using 
Velocys’ technology.

Exchange rates
As the Company operates in multiple currencies, it may 
be impacted by fluctuations in exchange rates.

The Board recognises that further funding will be needed. 
Note 2 discusses uncertainties surrounding the extent 
and composition of future funding. The Company believes 
that equity remains the preferred structure to support 
the business as a going concern in the near term, but will 
keep this under review. The recently announced fundraise 
included the issue of loan notes that are convertible into 
equity. As such, in management’s view, they have the 
key characteristics of equity. Velocys continues to take 
measures to preserve cash in order to protect against 
unforeseen events. 

The Company is actively engaging with banks and financial 
advisers with high levels of expertise in project financing 
to support the financing plans for the types of projects it 
is developing. 

Based on cashflow forecasts the required currency 
mix is identified and foreign exchange contracts taken 
out accordingly. A number of brokers are used to give 
a balanced market view. Financial risks are expanded 
upon in note 28.

20    Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    21

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsPierre Jungels, CBE
Chairman

Velocys has the long-term 
ambition to grow significantly, 
and to develop into an 
established multinational 
business. We need to have the 
right governance and reward 
culture that supports and 
nurtures that development, 
and a capability that enables 
us to stay one step ahead of 
the growth curve.”

Corporate
governance
report

Velocys Board

Chairman: Pierre Jungels

Audit & Risk Committee

Remuneration Committee

Nominations Committee

Chair: Mark Chatterji*

Chair: Sandy Shaw

Chair: Pierre Jungels

Under its revised terms of reference, 
the Audit & Risk Committee meets 
at least four times a year. Among its 
duties it reviews the Company’s audit 
planning, risk management systems 
and processes and effectiveness of 
internal controls, accounting policies 
and financial reporting, provides 
a forum through which the external 
auditors report, and reviews and 
monitors their independence and 
the provision of additional services. 
At least once a year it meets with the 
external auditors without Executive 
Directors present.

Read more on risk 
management on page 27

*Resigned 25 April 2017.

This committee reviews, inter-
alia, the performance of Executive 
Directors and sets the scale and 
structure of their remuneration 
and the basis of their service 
agreements, having due regard 
to the interests of shareholders. 
The committee also determines 
the allocation of share options to 
Executive Directors. No director has 
a service agreement exceeding one 
year. Under its terms of reference, no 
director is permitted to participate 
in decisions concerning his or her 
own remuneration.

Read the Directors’ 
remuneration report on pages

30

33

The committee meets at least twice a 
year, and among its duties it reviews 
the composition of the Board and 
its succession planning, the Board 
evaluation process and the findings 
from recent evaluations, director 
performance and recommendations 
for re-elections at the AGM, 
and considerations of director 
independence under the Code.

Introduction
Companies whose securities are traded 
on the AIM market of The London Stock 
Exchange are not required to comply with 
the principles and provisions of the UK 
Corporate Governance Code 2016 (“Code”). 
However, the Board has determined that 
Velocys should maintain high standards 
of corporate governance and, whilst not 
complying fully with the Code including the 
full disclosure requirements, has taken 
steps to adopt the underlying principles of 
the Code in so far as the Board considers 
these to be appropriate given the size of 
the Company and the nature of its current 
operations. The information required under 
Disclosure Guidance and Transparency 
Rule 7.2.6 is included in this report.

Board of directors
Independence
Pierre Jungels has served more than three 
consecutive three year terms of office. 
However, the Board considers that he 
makes a significant contribution to the 
Company and that he has retained his 
independence of character and judgement 
notwithstanding his long-term relationship 
with the Company.

The Board regards each of the other 
Non-Executive Directors as being fully 
independent. In accordance with Code 
Provision B.7.1, resolutions will be proposed 
at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting 
for the re-appointment of all directors.

Avoidance of conflicts of interest
The Company has a procedure for the 
disclosure, review, authorisation and 
management of directors’ conflicts of 
interest and potential conflicts of interest 
in accordance with the provisions of the 
Company’s Act 2006. In deciding whether 
to authorise a conflict or potential conflict, 
the directors must have regard to their 
general duties under the Companies Act 
2006. The authorisation of any conflict 
matter, and the terms of authorisation are 
subject to determination by the Board and 
regularly reviewed.

The Board and its committees
The Board is responsible to shareholders 
for setting the Company’s strategy and 
overseeing its execution, and for the overall 
management, control and performance of 
the Velocys business. It delegates certain 
responsibilities to designated committees, 
as set out above. The committees’ terms of 
reference are reviewed annually against 
regulatory requirements and current best 
practice. Information on the work of the 
three Board committees is set out above.

The Corporate governance 
report continues on page

26

Division of responsibility
The roles of the Chairman and the Chief 
Executive are separated, with clear 
written guidance to support the division 
of responsibilities. The Chairman is 
principally responsible for leadership 
and effectiveness of the Board, setting 
the Board agenda, ensuring adequacy 
of information flow to the Board and 
adequacy of consideration of strategic 
issues, and promoting a culture of 
openness of debate at Board level 
and between directors and the senior 
management team. The Chief Executive is 
primarily responsible for the management 
of the business and implementation of 
the Company’s strategy and policies; 
maintaining a close working relationship 
with the Chairman; and leading the senior 
management team.

Since January 2015, Julian West has acted 
as Senior Independent Director, providing 
a strong and skilled sounding board for the 
Chairman and serving as an intermediary 
for the other directors as necessary. In 
addition, he is available to shareholders to 
air concerns that have not been addressed 
through other formal channels.

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t

G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

i

F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

22    Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    23
Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    23

 
 
Our Board of directors
The Board includes individuals with a deep knowledge of oil 
and gas markets and industry contacts at the highest level.

Chairman & Executive Board

N

Name Dr Pierre Jungels, CBE
Role Chairman
Skills and experience
Pierre is an oil industry veteran, with over 
30 years’ experience – 12 of which were spent 
at main board level, including appointments 
as Chairman of Rockhopper Exploration plc, 
Chief Executive of Enterprise Oil plc, Executive 
Director of PetroFina, and Managing Director 
of British Gas. He also currently holds a non-
executive directorship at Baker Hughes Inc. 
Pierre is a certified engineer and has a PhD in 
geophysics and hydraulics from the California 
Institute of Technology. He was twice President 
of  the Institute of Petroleum. 

Name David Pummell 
Role Chief Executive Officer
Skills and experience
With over 30 years of energy and oil industry 
experience, David joined Velocys from ACAL 
Energy Ltd, a private equity backed fuel cell 
technology company, where he was CEO. 
Prior to this, David was CEO of MAPS Technology 
Ltd, where he successfully commercialised 
the technology leading to its subsequent 
acquisition by GE, before becoming CEO of 
Ceres Power Group plc, a developer of fuel cell 
micro combined heat and power (CHP) products. 
He began his career at BP as a chemical engineer 
before going on to hold a number of executive 
positions across the downstream business, 
including petrochemical manufacturing, 
supply chain, new business start-ups and 
a number of senior business and functional 
management roles during his 22-year tenure.

Name Susan Robertson
Role Chief Financial Officer
Skills and experience
Susan came to Velocys from the BOC Group 
where she had held various senior-level financial 
management and business development 
positions since 1990. Susan helped to set up and 
then, from 2003 to 2006, served as Vice President 
and CFO of Japan Air Gases (JAG), a joint venture 
between BOC Group and Air Liquide. Prior to 
taking up her position with JAG, she held finance 
positions with BOC in Japan, the UK and globally, 
as well as strategic and business development 
roles in the UK. Susan has an honours degree 
in economics from Cambridge University and is 
a chartered accountant (FCA) having originally 
trained with Arthur Andersen in London. 

Name Dr Paul F. Schubert 
Role Chief Operating Officer
Skills and experience
Paul has 35 years of experience in the 
petrochemical and natural gas industry. He has 
held various technical and general management 
roles with SGS Group, Syntroleum, Catalytica, 
Phillips Petroleum, and Engelhard. In these 
positions he was responsible for day-to-
day operations, process development and 
commercialisation, plant design, and asset 
integrity management.

Paul is the inventor or co-inventor of 16 US 
patents and is the author of over 40 publications. 
He holds a PhD in Inorganic Chemistry from the 
University of Illinois, and a BS in Chemistry from 
the University of Arkansas. 

Non-Executive Board

Committee key

R

N

Audit and Risk Committee

Remuneration Committee

Nominations Committee

Chairman of Committee

Sector experience

˜	Oil, gas and petrochemicals
˜	Banking and finance
˜	Energy
˜	Engineering
˜	Chemicals

A

R

N

R

N

A

R

N

Name Julian West
Role Senior Independent Director
Skills and experience
Julian brings over forty years’ experience of 
energy policy, in both the private and public 
sectors, and has broad expertise in international 
politics, privatisation, energy economics, and 
regulation of energy companies. Until 2008, 
he was a Senior Director at Cambridge Energy 
Research Associates (CERA), leading the firm's 
oil teams. Before joining CERA in 1996, Julian 
was an executive and main Board Director at 
Enterprise Oil plc, where he was responsible 
for the company's planning and business 
development. Previously, at the UK Department 
of Energy (1974-83), he focused on oil and 
energy policy and financial control and, under 
different administrations, served as Principal 
Private Secretary to a Minister of State and 
three Secretaries of State. 

Name Sandy Shaw
Role Non-Executive Director
Skills and experience
Sandy has nearly 40 years of experience in 
the oil and gas industry. From 2008 until its 
take-over in 2013 Sandy was an Executive 
Director Corporate & Commercial, and Company 
Secretary of Valiant Petroleum PLC, a company 
of which she was a founder and initially 
a Non-Executive Director. She has held senior 
executive positions as group legal counsel and/
or commercial director for numerous companies 
including Consort Resources, LASMO PLC 
(where she was also inter alia President of 
LASMO USA), Esso Petroleum, Marathon Oil 
and Mobil. Sandy has extensive oil and gas M&A 
experience, has overseen numerous material 
private equity subscriptions and led a £200m 
trade sale through to final negotiations. She has 
worked as  a consultant to several oil and gas 
companies, as well as two UK law firms.

Name Ross Allonby
Role Non-Executive Director
Skills and experience
Ross brings considerable experience in the 
banking and finance sector to Velocys. He is 
a Founder, Managing Partner and CEO/CIO of 
First River Capital Partners LLP, an integrated 
advisory, origination, structuring and investment 
management business providing companies in 
emerging markets with debt financing solutions. 

He was formerly Head of Emerging Markets 
(EM) Credit Trading at Bank of America Merrill 
Lynch, responsible for EM direct lending, loans, 
structured credit trading, EM special situations, 
EM distressed/high yield and EM flow trading. 
Prior to joining Merrill Lynch, he was a Director 
in the Capital Markets Group of Standard 
Bank, London, and had previously been a VP 
at Goldman Sachs. 

24    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    25

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsCorporate governance (continued)

The Corporate governance 
report continues from page

23

The Board and its committees (continued)
Meetings
The Board meets formally at least six 
times a year to set the overall direction 
and strategy of the Company, to review 
operating and financial performance and to 
consider and advise on senior management 
appointments. The Board also monitors 
and approves financial policy and budgets, 
including capital expenditure. 

Directors receive briefing papers in 
advance of meetings – a consolidated 
CEO’s report encompassing all areas 
of the business, including health and 
safety information, status updates 
on project development and special 
projects, competitor activity and key 
issues facing the Company; and a CFO’s 
report, which sets out performance 
against budget during the period since 
the previous  meeting. Open dialogue is 
encouraged and all directors have the 
opportunity to challenge and seek further 
information or clarification as appropriate. 
All key operational decisions are subject 
to Board approval. 

In addition to the scheduled Board 
meetings detailed above, a further three 
meetings in 2016, which were held at 
short notice to consider specific matters, 
were attended by all directors, apart from 
Ross Allonby who was unable to attend 
one meeting.

Reports by committee
The minutes of the Audit & Risk, 
Remuneration and Nomination Committees 
are circulated to the Board. The committee 
chairs also report to the Board on the 
outcome of committee meetings at the 
subsequent Board meeting.

Performance evaluation
This year’s evaluation of the Board, its 
committees and individual directors 
has been carried out by the Company 
Secretary, taking the form of individual 
interviews with each director, and 
comprehensive questionnaires, which 
provided all directors with an opportunity 
to comment on Board and committee 
procedures. A performance evaluation of 
the Chairman has been carried out, led by 
the Senior Independent Director, and taking 
into account the views of all directors. 
As in the previous year, the results of the 
evaluation are being considered by the 
Board and each committee in open session 
and, where appropriate, actions arising 
from such reviews will be implemented 
and monitored.

Attendance at scheduled Board and committee meetings

Board

Audit & Risk 
Committee

Remuneration 
Committee

Nominations 
Committee

Number of meetings 
held in 2016

Attendance* by:

Pierre Jungels

Ross Allonby

Mark Chatterji

David Pummell

Susan Robertson

Paul Schubert

Sandy Shaw

Julian West

Jan Verloop

7

100%

86%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

5

–

100%

100%

–

–

–

–

100%

–

4

–

75%

–

–

–

–

100%

100%

–

4

100%

75%

100%

–

–

–

100%

100%

100%

*  The attendance percentage relates only to applicable meetings. Jan Verloop resigned from the Board in 

September 2016.

Re-election
The Company’s Articles of Association 
provide that directors are subject to 
election by shareholders at the first 
opportunity after their appointment, 
and that one third of directors are subject 
to retirement by rotation at each Annual 
General Meeting. At the 2017 meeting, 
all directors will once again stand for 
re-election, continuing the practice 
introduced in 2016.

Company Secretary
The Company Secretary, through the 
Chairman, is responsible for advising 
the Board on governance matters, 
and for ensuring that Board procedures 
are followed and that applicable 
rules and regulations are complied 
with. All directors have access to the 
advice and services of the Company 
Secretary. An agreed procedure exists 
for directors in the furtherance of their 
duties to take independent professional 
advice. During 2016, no director sought 
independent legal advice pursuant to 
the policy.

Relations with shareholders
The Board considers effective 
communication with shareholders to be 
very important, and encourages regular 
dialogue with investors. Directors regularly 
attend meetings with shareholders and 
analysts throughout the year, and the 
Board responds promptly to questions 
received. Shareholders will be given 
at least 21 days’ notice of the Annual 
General Meeting, at which they will have 
the opportunity to discuss the Company’s 
developments and performance.

The Company’s website www.velocys.com 
contains full details of the Company’s 
business activities, as well as press 
releases and other details. It links to the 
London Stock Exchange website for share 
price details, share trading activities and 
graphs, as well as Regulatory News Service 
(RNS) announcements.

Maintenance of a system of internal 
controls
The directors have overall responsibility 
for ensuring that the Company maintains 
a system of internal control to provide 
them with reasonable assurance that the 
assets of the Company are safeguarded 
and that shareholders’ investments are 
protected. The system includes internal 
controls appropriate for a Company of 
the size of Velocys, and covers financial, 
operational, compliance (including health 
and safety) and risk management. Such 
systems are designed to manage, rather 
than eliminate, the risk of failure to 
achieve business objectives; any system 
can provide only reasonable, and not 
absolute, assurance against material 
misstatement or loss. The process in 
place for reviewing Velocys’ systems of 
internal control includes procedures 
designed to identify and evaluate failings 
and weaknesses, and, in the case of any 
categorised as significant, procedures exist 
to ensure that necessary action is taken to 
remedy the failings.

The Board has considered its policies with 
regard to internal controls as set out in 
the Code and undertakes assessments 
of the major areas of the business and 
methods used to monitor and control them. 

In addition to financial risk, the review 
covers operational, commercial, regulatory 
and health and safety risks. The risk review 
is an ongoing process with reviews being 
undertaken on a regular basis.

The key procedures designed to provide 
an effective system of internal controls 
that are operating up to the date of  
sign-off of this report are set out below.

Control environment
There is an organisational structure with 
clearly defined lines of responsibility and 
delegation of accountability and authority.

Risk management
The Company employs directors and senior 
personnel with the appropriate knowledge 
and experience for a business engaged 
in activities in its field of operations, and 
undertakes regular risk assessments 
and reviews of its activities. During 2016 
the committee had two members, 
Mark Chatterji and Ross Allonby, who have 
recent and relevant financial experience. 
The committee keeps under annual 
review whether an internal audit function 
should be established. Although this is not 
considered necessary at the present time 
given the size of the Company, this decision 
will be reviewed as the operations of the 
Company develop.

In its approach to risk management the 
committee considers the complexity of 
the transaction of building GTL plants, 
which involves a large number of possible 
stakeholders – asset holder, project 
developer, EPC, financing party(ies), 
technology licensors and offtake partners. 
The risks associated with each of these 
parties, and the relationship that Velocys 
has with each one, are analysed to identify 
areas of potential risk. Additionally the 
committee considers risks that are beyond 
the Company’s control, but against which 
it can take mitigating action. These include 
market risk and risk from competitors.

The Audit & Risk Committee reviews all of 
the Company’s principal risk management 
policies and the ongoing development of a 
Company risk register.

Details of risks to the business that the 
Board considers to be potentially material 
are set out in the Strategic report on pages 
18 to 21 and note 28. The risks posed by 
the UK Brexit vote and the US presidential 
election have been considered in the 
risk assessment process and, where 
appropriate, their impacts reflected in 
other relevant risks, rather than being 
presented as a standalone risk. 

The risks presented are the principal risks 
that the Company believes it currently 
faces. However, additional risks, of 
which the Company is aware, or risks 
the Company currently considers to be 
less significant, could have a material 
adverse impact. The risks included are 
not presented in order of priority.

Financial information
The Company prepares detailed budget 
and working capital projections, 
which are approved annually by the Board 
and are maintained and updated regularly 
throughout the year. Detailed management 
accounts and working capital cash flows are 
prepared on a monthly basis and compared 
to budgets and projections to identify any 
significant variances.

The Audit & Risk Committee has considered 
the integrity of the Company’s 2016 
financial statements and reviewed the 
appropriateness of its critical accounting 
policies and the judgements made in 
applying them. The year-end financial 
statements were reviewed and discussed 
with PwC. In addition, the interim financial 
statements were reviewed by the 
committee. The committee considered, 
among others, the following specific 
matters:
˜	 Carrying value of Goodwill and other 
Intangible assets; and investment 
in subsidiaries.
˜	 Going concern.
˜	 Accounting for ENVIA as an associate.

Audit review
The Audit & Risk Committee has discussed 
PwC’s audit process, and the findings from 
the audit of the 2015 financial year were 
reviewed, along with feedback from the CFO 
on the effectiveness of the external audit 
process. The committee reviewed the quality 
and cost effectiveness of the external audit, 
and the independence and objectivity of 
the auditors. It obtained confirmation from 
PwC that their independence and ethics 
policies complied with FRC requirements, 
and that they remain independent and 
maintain internal safeguards to ensure 
their objectivity. No contractual obligations 
exist that restrict the Company’s choice 
of external auditor and the committee 
is satisfied that the external auditor 
remains independent. 

The committee has established policies 
determining the non-audit services that 
the external auditors can provide and 
the procedures required for approval of 
any such engagement. Further details of 
fees paid to PwC for both audit and non-
audit work can be found in note 11 to the 
financial statements.

Management of liquid resources
The Board is risk averse when investing the 
Company’s surplus cash. The Company’s 
treasury management policy is reviewed 
periodically, and sets out strict procedures 
and limits on how surplus funds 
are invested.

Review of corporate governance 
disclosures
The Board has voluntarily complied with 
those key principles of the Code in so far as 
they are considered appropriate given the 
size of the Company and the nature of its 
operations. These have not been formally 
reviewed by the Company’s auditors. 
The auditors’ responsibility extends only to 
reading this report as a part of the Annual 
report and accounts and considering 
whether it is materially consistent with 
the audited financial statements.

26    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    27

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsDirectors’ report
The directors present their report and the audited consolidated 
financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2016

Company
Velocys plc is the parent of the Company. It is a public limited company incorporated and registered in England and Wales. The registered 
office address is given on the information page inside the back cover of this document.

Directors’ qualifying third-party indemnity provision
The Company maintains directors’ qualifying third-party indemnity insurance to provide cover for legal action against its directors. 
This has been in place throughout the year and remains in place at the date of this report.

Future developments
The Board aims to pursue its corporate strategies as detailed in the Strategic report on pages 1 to 21.

Dividends
The Directors do not recommend any dividend for the year ended 31 December 2016 (2015: nil).

Research and development
The Company’s R&D activity will extend to joint development programmes with technology partners (such as TRI). Details of R&D expense 
and capitalised R&D are in notes 10 and 17.

Donations
The Company made no political donations during 2016.

Post-balance sheet events
Additional funding by the Company to ENVIA Energy, which was announced in February 2016, is described in the Strategic report on page 17, 
and in note 20 along with other post-balance sheet events.

Directors
The directors of Velocys plc as at 31 December 2016, who served throughout the year and up to the date of approval of the financial 
statements, unless otherwise stated, were as follows.
˜˜ Pierre Jungels (Non-Executive Chairman)
˜˜ David Pummell (Chief Executive Officer) – appointed 6 January 2017
˜˜ Susan Robertson (Chief Financial Officer)
˜˜ Paul Schubert (Chief Operating Officer)
˜˜

Julian West (Senior Independent Director)
Jan Verloop (Non-Executive Director) – resigned 21 September 2016

˜˜

˜˜ Sandy Shaw (Non-Executive Director)
˜˜ Mark Chatterji (Non-Executive Director) – resigned 25 April 2017
˜˜ Ross Allonby (Non-Executive Director)

Whilst the Company’s Articles of Association require that all directors are subject to election by shareholders at the first opportunity after 
their appointment, and to re-election thereafter at intervals of not more than three years, the directors have decided that, in line with best 
corporate governance practice, at the 2017 Annual General Meeting all of the directors will again retire and offer themselves for re-election, 
as they did in 2016.

Directors’ interests
The directors who held office at 31 December 2016 had the following interests in the shares of parent company undertakings (as recorded 
in the Register of Directors’ Interests and including those of the spouse or civil partner and children under 18).

Financial instruments
The Company’s financial instruments are detailed in note 28. Financial risks, and exposure and risk management policies and objectives 
are detailed in the Strategic report on page 21, and in note 28.

Substantial shareholdings
The Company was notified of the following holdings of 3% or more of the issued share capital of Velocys plc as at 1 May 2017.

Ervington Investments Limited 
Lansdowne Partners 
Invesco Asset Management 
Henderson Global Investors 
Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management 

Number of  
shares held 

42,442,443 
26,631,808 
23,600,000 
17,593,137 
5,472,676 

Percentage
of issued
share capital

29.48%
18.50%
16.39%
12.22%
3.80%

Greenhouse gas emissions
Details of the Company’s greenhouse gas emissions are included in the Strategic report on page 17.

Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at Milton Park Innovation Centre, 99 Park Drive, Milton Park, 
Oxfordshire OX14 4RY on Thursday 22 June 2017.

Auditors and disclosure of information to auditors
Each of the persons who is a director at the date of approval of this report confirms that:
˜˜ So far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditors are unaware.
˜˜

The Director has taken all the steps that he / she ought to have taken as a director in order to make himself / herself aware of any  
relevant audit information and to establish that the Company’s auditors are aware of that information.

This confirmation is given and should be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of s418 of the Companies Act 2006.

Corporate governance
The Company’s statement on corporate governance is available on pages 22 to 27.

Approved by the Board and signed on its behalf by:

Susan Robertson 
Pierre Jungels 
Julian West 
Sandy Shaw 
David Pummell 
Paul Schubert 
Mark Chatterji 
Ross Allonby 

Directors’ share options and service contracts are detailed in the Directors’ remuneration report.

Velocys plc Ordinary shares

31 December  
2016 

31 December
2015

304,874 
223,031 
75,000 
17,758 
– 
– 
– 
– 

304,874
223,031
75,000
17,758
–
–
–
–

David Pummell
Chief Executive Officer
15 May 2017

28    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    29

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Directors’ remuneration report

Introduction
The Remuneration Committee is resolute in maintaining high standards of corporate governance and has taken steps to comply with 
the principles of best practice in so far as it can be applied practically given the size of the Company. The Company is listed on AIM and is 
therefore not required to comply with the following regulations: disclosure requirements of the Directors’ Remuneration Report Regulations 
2013; the UKLA Listing Rules; the disclosure provisions under schedule 8 to SI 2008/410 of the large and medium-sized companies and 
groups (accounts and reports) regulations 2008. Consequently, certain disclosures contained in these regulations are not included below.

Unaudited information
Remuneration Committee
The following served as members of the Committee throughout the year ended 31 December 2016.
˜˜ Sandy Shaw (Chair)
˜˜ Julian West
˜˜ Ross Allonby

The Committee’s constitution and operation is compliant with the provisions of the Code on Corporate Governance. In determining 
remuneration policy for Executive Directors, the Committee takes into consideration both the Code and the guidelines published  
by The Investment Association (formerly the Association of British Insurers).

Remuneration policy for Executive Directors
The remuneration policy has been designed to ensure that Executive Directors receive incentives and rewards appropriate to their 
performance, responsibility and experience. In making its assessment, the Remuneration Committee seeks to align the policy with  
the interests of the shareholders.

Key features of the policy are:
˜˜ Setting salaries to be competitive relative to the experience of the individual and the nature, complexity and responsibilities of their 

work in order to attract and retain management of the required quality.

˜˜ Linking individual remuneration packages to the Company’s performance through bonus schemes and long-term share-based plans.
˜˜ Providing employment and post-retirement benefits in accordance with standard policies of the Company.

The following chart illustrates the proportion of fixed and variable elements in the remuneration package, assuming target and stretch 
performance is achieved. 

Maximum 

Target 

Minimum 

Base 

Bonus 

LTIP 

0 

50 

100 

150 

200 

250 

300 

350 

400 

450 

As % of base salary

30    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Remuneration of Executive Directors
Executive Directors’ remuneration is considered annually. In addition, the Remuneration Committee undertakes periodically  
a comprehensive review using external advisors. At the start of 2016, the arrival of the new CEO necessitated a review of the overall 
remuneration package for the Executive Directors. Current remuneration is based on the following principles. 

Base salary
The base salary is reviewed annually at the beginning of each year. The review process undertaken by the Remuneration Committee 
considers the ongoing development of the Company, the contribution of the individual, the need to retain and motivate employees,  
and benchmark remuneration information from comparable organisations.

Annual performance incentive
All Executive Directors are eligible, at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee, for an annual bonus. The target bonus award for each 
individual is based on a percentage of base salary, which, for the year commencing 1 January 2016, was 75%. The maximum award for 
stretch target performance is twice the target amount. The Remuneration Committee sets performance targets for bonus awards at the 
beginning of each year. Awards are determined by both the performance of the individual and the Company as a whole at the end of each 
year. The performance targets for the Company comprise measures of financial, technical and business development goals. For 2016, 
the Remuneration Committee decided that no bonus would be awarded.

Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
The committee believes that the LTIP scheme should provide to Executive Directors appropriate incentivisation, focus and reward for 
achievement, that is aligned with shareholder interests, and that includes relevant, demanding performance targets. The last LTIP scheme 
that the Company put in place was in 2014 and, due to the change in CEO and the intention to review the Company strategy, the committee 
decided not to make an award under this scheme during 2016. Instead, the committee intends to introduce a new equity-based incentive 
scheme in 2017. It may, in the allocation of such awards, take into consideration the fact that no 2016 awards were made.

Pensions and other benefits
The Company contributes to individuals’ defined contribution pension plans in line with the Company-wide schemes in place.  
For UK-based employees, the Company contributions are 7% of base salary. For US-based employees, the contributions are 3% 
of  pensionable pay (which includes bonus) up to the maximum allowable under US pensions law.

Other benefits provided are life insurance, private medical insurance and relocation allowances where applicable, in line with the 
Company’s standard policies. 

Directors’ service contracts
Each of the Executive Directors has a service contract with a notice period of six months. 

Remuneration policy for Non-Executive Directors
The remuneration of Non-Executive Directors is determined by the executive members of the Board in consultation with the Chairman, 
based on a benchmark review of current practices in similar companies. The Non-Executive Directors are paid a fixed fee and do not  
receive any pension payments, bonus or other benefits. 

Non-Executive Directors are appointed for an initial three-year term and are typically expected to serve for two three-year terms. 
Either the Non-Executive Director or the Company can terminate the contract with three months’ written notice; the Chairman’s notice 
period is also three months. The Company may invite a Non-Executive Director to serve for further periods after the expiry of two three-
year terms subject to a particularly rigorous review of performance, and taking into account the need for progressive refreshing of the 
Board. Under the Company’s Articles of Association, all directors are required to stand for re-election by shareholders on appointment 
and thereafter at least once every three years. However, in line with best practice, the Company decided in 2016 to put all Non-Executive 
Directors up for re-election at its Annual General Meeting (AGM) and intends to do the same at the 2017 AGM.

Proposed ratification of breach of Article 92 
During the three financial years ended 31 December 2016, fees were paid to the Chairman and other Non-Executive Directors in excess 
of the aggregate limit of £250,000 specified in Article 92 of the Articles adopted on 22 June 2011. This amount was set at the formation 
of the Company in 2006 and although the Articles allow this amount to be amended by ordinary resolution, and despite the growth of the 
Company since this point, no subsequent amendment has been made. The aggregate amount of these fees, as set out in the Company’s 
Annual report and accounts for the years ended 31 December 2016 and 2015 is as follows.

Aggregate fees paid to Chairman and Non-Executive Directors  

2016 
£ 

2015
£

268,500 

271,853

At the Board meeting in September 2016, in light of the breach of Article 92, the Non-Executive Directors voluntarily agreed that they 
would each accept a cut in fees to reduce the annual cost of fees to within the limit of £250,000. In addition, a resolution will be proposed 
at the 2017 AGM to approve and ratify any payments to the Chairman and other Non-Executive Directors out of the funds of the Company 
by way of fees for their services in excess of the amount specified in Article 92 of the Articles as though the directors had been authorised 
pursuant to Article 92 of the Articles to make payments of such amounts. 

Further information is set out in the Notice of Annual General Meeting, which is being published together with this Annual report 
and accounts.

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    31

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Directors’ remuneration report (continued)

Audited information
Directors’ remuneration
Aggregate emoluments for current and former directors in 2016 totalled £1,085,137 (2015: £1,645,154), and Company pension contributions 
were £41,760 (2015: £31,734). 

The directors who held office at 31 December 2016 received the following remuneration in relation to the year ended 31 December 2016. 

Name of director 

Executive
David Pummell 
Susan Robertson 
Paul Schubert 
Non-Executive 
Pierre Jungels 
Julian West 
Mark Chatterji 
Ross Allonby 
Sandy Shaw 

Salary and 
fees1 
£ 

Other 
benefits2 
£ 

2016 
Total 
£ 

2016 
Pension 
£ 

2015 
 Total 
£ 

2015
Pension 
£

261,263 
218,000 
238,778 

78,000 
43,875 
43,875 
43,875 
43,875 

27,332 
770 
28,237 

– 
– 
23,076 
– 
– 

288,595 
218,770 
267,015 

78,000 
43,875 
66,951 
43,875 
43,875 

18,550 
15,260 
7,950 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
377,878 
330,757 

80,000 
45,000 
12,188 
3,750 
45,000 

–
15,071
5,201

–
–
–
–
–

Aggregate emoluments and pension contributions 

971,541 

79,415 

1,050,956 

41,760 

894,573 

20,272

1 

 All salaries and fees are denominated in pounds sterling except for that of Paul Schubert, who is based in the US and paid in dollars. His remuneration has been 
converted from dollars to pounds at the exchange rate on the date of recognition of the cost. The average rate used for translation of his 2016 salary was £1= $1.36 
compared to £1= $1.53 in 2015. 

2   Other benefits include medical cover for Executive Directors and, in the case David Pummell, a joining allowance in lieu of car allowance. In the case of Paul Schubert, 
benefits include costs related to his relocation to Houston. In the case of Mark Chatterji, who is located in the US, other benefits include the cost of his travel from the 
US to the UK for Board meetings along with associated expenses that are paid by the Company. 

Directors’ share options
Aggregate emoluments disclosed above include amounts paid through the employee benefit trust (EBT) in relation to share options 
exercised. In 2016 no payments were made to serving directors (2015: none) and a payment of £13,300 was made in respect of an 
exercise by the former CEO under his 2015 settlement agreement.

Details of all directors’ shareholdings are disclosed on page 28 in the Directors’ report.

Details of options held by the directors at 31 December 2016 are as follows.

Name of director 

Susan Robertson 
EMI 
Bonus 2008 
Bonus 2010 
ELTIP 2009 
ELTIP 2011 
ELTIP 2012 
ELTIP 2012 
ELTIP 2013 
ELTIP 2013 
ELTIP 2014 
ELTIP 2014 
ELTIP 2015 
ELTIP 2015 
ELTIP 2015 
ELTIP 2015 

At 31 
December  
2015 

62,893 
42,105 
37,655 
105,000 
390,625 
365,000 
273,803 
502,930 
125,732 
440,316 
110,079 
56,742 
189,139 
47,425 
158,083 

Total 

2,907,527 

Granted 

Exercised 

Lapsed 

At 31 
December 
2016 

Exercise 
price (£) 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

62,893 
42,105 
37,655 
105,000 
390,625 
365,000 
273,803 
502,930 
125,732 
440,316 
110,079 
56,742 
189,139 
47,425 
158,083 

2,907,527 

1.59 
0.01 
0.01 
0.01 
0.01 
0.49 
0.49 
1.59 
1.59 
1.64 
1.64 
Nil 
Nil 
Nil 
Nil 

Earliest 
date of 
exercise 

29/10/10 
31/03/09 
20/03/11 
31/01/12 
20/09/11 
01/01/15 
01/01/12 
01/01/16 
12/04/13 
01/01/17 
01/04/14 
01/01/17 
01/01/17 
01/01/18 
01/01/18 

  Exercisable
at 31
December
2016

Date of 
expiry 

01/04/18 
31/03/19 
20/03/21 
21/11/19 
20/09/21 
01/02/22 
01/02/22 
12/04/23 
12/04/23 
01/04/24 
01/04/24 
26/02/25 
26/02/25 
26/02/25 
26/02/25 

62,893
42,105
37,655
105,000
390,625
365,000
273,803
502,930
125,732
–
110,079
–
–
–
–

2,015,822

Name of director 

Paul Schubert
EMI 
ELTIP 2012 
ELTIP 2013 
ELTIP 2013 
ELTIP 2014 
ELTIP 2014 
ELTIP 2015 
ELTIP 2015 
ELTIP 2015 
ELTIP 2015 

At 31 
December  
2015 

207,894 
119,000 
502,930 
41,911 
336,711 
56,119 
43,344 
144,482 
36,227 
120,758 

Total 

1,609,376 

Granted 

Exercised 

At 31 
  December 
2016 

Lapsed 

Exercise 
price (£) 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

207,894 
119,000 
502,930 
41,911 
336,711 
56,119 
43,344 
144,482 
36,227 
120,758 

1,609,376 

0.92 
0.49 
1.59 
1.59 
1.64 
1.64 
Nil 
Nil 
Nil 
Nil 

Earliest 
date of 
exercise 

04/10/14 
01/01/15 
01/01/16 
01/01/15 
01/01/17 
01/01/15 
01/01/17 
01/01/17 
01/01/18 
01/01/18 

  Exercisable
at 31
December
2016

Date of 
expiry 

04/10/21 
01/02/22 
12/04/23 
12/04/23 
01/04/24 
01/04/24 
26/02/25 
26/02/25 
26/02/25 
26/02/25 

207,894
119,000
502,930
41,911
–
56,119
–
–
–
–

927,854

No options were exercised by acting directors during 2016. The total charge for share-based payments during the year in respect of 
directors was £357,000.

Shareholding requirements
The Company has not previously had in place guidelines covering shareholdings of Executive Directors. It is intended that the new  
equity-based incentive scheme, to be introduced in 2017, will include such guidelines designed to ensure that Executive Directors 
retain an interest in the Company. 

Former directors
Jan Verloop, who was a member of the Board at 1 January 2016 and resigned during the year, received the following remuneration.

Name of director 

Jan Verloop 

Salary  
and fees 
£ 

34,181 

Other 
benefits 
£ 

2016 
Total 
£ 

2016 
pension 
£ 

2015 
 Total 
£ 

2015
pension 
£

– 

34,181 

– 

44,666 

–

Share price
The market price of the parent company’s shares as at 31 December 2016 was 37p (2015: 42p) and the range during the year was 25p to 
44p (2015: 34p to 169p). Details of options and the cost of share-based payments are given in note 15.

32    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    33

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statement of directors’ responsibilities 
in respect of the financial statements

Independent auditors’ report
to the members of Velocys plc

The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law  
and regulation.

Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have prepared 
the financial statements for the parent company (Velocys plc) and the Company (Velocys plc and its subsidiaries) in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union. Under company law the directors must not approve 
the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the parent 
company, and of the profit or loss of the Company for that period. In preparing the financial statements, the directors are required to:
˜˜ Select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently.
˜˜ State whether applicable IFRSs as adopted by the European Union have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and 

explained in the financial statements.

˜˜ Make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent.
˜˜ Prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue 

in business.

The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions 
and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and of Velocys plc and enable them to ensure 
that the financial statements and the Directors’ remuneration report comply with the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the Company 
financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.

The directors are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and of Velocys plc and hence for taking reasonable steps for 
the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the 
preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

The directors consider that the Annual report and accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the 
information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, business model and strategy.

Each of the directors, whose names and functions are listed in the Directors’ report confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:
˜˜

The financial statements of the Company and of Velocys plc, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the 
European Union, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit of the Company.
The Strategic report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company and 
parent company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces. 

˜˜

On behalf of the Board

David Pummell
Chief Executive Officer
15 May 2017

Report on the financial statements
Our opinion
In our opinion:
˜˜ Velocys plc’s consolidated financial statements (“Velocys”) and parent company financial statements (the “financial statements”) give 
a true and fair view of the state of Velocys’ and of the parent company’s affairs as at 31 December 2016 and of Velocys’ loss and Velocys’ 
and the parent company’s cash flows for the year then ended;

˜˜ Velocys’ financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”) 

as adopted by the European Union;
the parent company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union 
and as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006; and
the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

˜˜

˜˜

Emphasis of matter – Velocys and parent company - going concern
In forming our opinion on Velocys’ financial statements and the parent company financial statements, which is not modified, we have 
considered the adequacy of the disclosure made in note 2 to the financial statements concerning Velocys’ and the parent company’s 
ability to continue as a going concern. As outlined in note 2 to the financial statements, the directors' forecasts are dependent on key 
assumptions in relation to the ENVIA Oklahoma project startup reaching full operational capacity within 2017, the costs of ongoing 
development projects, coupled with Velocys reducing certain existing overhead costs, and Velocys raising additional funding by the 
second quarter of 2018. These conditions, along with the other matters explained in note 2 to the financial statements, indicate the 
existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about Velocys’ and the parent company’s ability to continue as 
a going concern. Velocys’ financial statements and the parent company financial statements do not include the adjustments that 
would result if Velocys and parent company were unable to continue as a going concern.

What we have audited
The financial statements, included within the Annual report and accounts (the “Annual Report”), comprise:
˜˜

the Consolidated statement of financial position and Velocys plc statement of financial position as at 31 December 2016;
the Consolidated income statement and Consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year then ended;
the Consolidated statement of cash flows and Velocys plc statement of cash flows for the year then ended;
the Consolidated statement of changes in equity and Velocys plc statement of changes in equity for the year then ended; and
the notes to the financial statements, which include a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

˜˜

˜˜

˜˜

˜˜

Certain required disclosures have been presented elsewhere in the Annual Report, rather than in the notes to the financial statements. 
These are cross-referenced from the financial statements and are identified as audited.

The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the financial statements is IFRSs as adopted by the 
European Union and, as regards the parent company financial statements, as applied in accordance with the provisions of the 
Companies Act 2006, and applicable law.

In applying the financial reporting framework, the directors have made a number of subjective judgements, for example in respect 
of significant accounting estimates. In making such estimates, they have made assumptions and considered future events.

Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
˜˜

the information given in the Strategic report and the Directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial statements are 
prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and
the Strategic report and the Directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

˜˜

In addition, in light of the knowledge and understanding of Velocys, the parent company and their environment obtained in the course 
of the audit, we are required to report if we have identified any material misstatements in the Strategic report and the Directors’ report. 
We have nothing to report in this respect.

Opinion on additional disclosures
Directors’ remuneration report
The parent company voluntarily prepares a Directors’ remuneration report in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 
2006. The directors have requested that we audit the part of the Directors’ remuneration report specified by the Companies Act 2006 to 
be audited as if the parent company were a quoted company.

In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies 
Act 2006.

Other matters on which we are required to report by exception
Adequacy of accounting records and information and explanations received
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
˜˜ we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or
˜˜

adequate accounting records have not been kept by the parent company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received 
from branches not visited by us; or
the parent company financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns.

˜˜

34    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys  Annual report and accounts 2016    35

We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsIndependent auditors’ report (continued)
to the members of Velocys plc

Consolidated income statement
for the year ended 31 December 2016

2016 
£’000 

2016 
£’000 

2016 
£’000 

2015 
£’000 

2015 
 £’000 

2015
£’000

Before  Exceptional 
items 
(note 4) 

exceptional 
items 

Before  Exceptional 
items 
(note 4) 

exceptional 
items 

2,002 
(1,275) 

727 
(25,483) 
2,009 

– 
– 

– 
(1,204) 
1,763 

Total 

1,445 
(1,060) 

385 
(20,238) 
2,768 

Total

2,002
(1,275)

727
(26,687)
3,772

– 
– 

– 
(2,809) 
2,496 

(313) 

(17,085) 

(22,747) 

559 

(22,188)

– 

(313) 
– 
– 

– 

(313) 
– 

(306) 

(17,391) 
3,344 
(26) 

– 

(22,747) 
1,155 
(53) 

3,318 

1,102 

(14,073) 
1,404 

(21,645) 
1,035 

– 

559 
– 
– 

– 

559 
– 

–

(22,188)
1,155
(53)

1,102

(21,086)
1,035

1,445 
(1,060) 

385 
(17,429) 
272 

(16,722) 

(306) 

(17,078) 
3,344 
(26) 

3,318 

(13,760) 
1,404 

(12,356) 

(313) 

(12,669) 

(20,610) 

559 

(20,051)

Note 

6 

9 

10 

20 

7 
8 

13 

Revenue 
Cost of sales 

Gross profit 
Administrative expenses 
Other income 

Operating (loss) income 
Share of loss of investments accounted for 

using the equity method 

(Loss) income before finance income 
Finance income 
Finance costs 

Finance income, net 

(Loss) income before income tax 
Income tax credit 

(Loss) income for the financial year attributable  

to the owners of Velocys plc 

Loss per share attributable  

to the owners of Velocys plc 

Basic and diluted loss per share (pence) 

16 

(8.62) 

(8.84) 

(14.52) 

(14.13)

The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.

Directors’ remuneration
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion, certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified 
by law are not made. We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility. 

Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit
Our responsibilities and those of the directors
As explained more fully in the Statement of directors' responsibilities set out on page 34, the directors are responsible for the preparation 
of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view.

Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International 
Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) (“ISAs (UK & Ireland)”). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board’s 
Ethical Standards for Auditors.

This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the parent company’s members as a body in accordance with 
Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume 
responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where 
expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.

What an audit of financial statements involves
We conducted our audit in accordance with ISAs (UK & Ireland). An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures 
in the financial statements sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, 
whether caused by fraud or error. This includes an assessment of: 
˜˜ whether the accounting policies are appropriate to Velocys’ and the parent company’s circumstances and have been consistently applied 

and adequately disclosed; 
the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors; and
the overall presentation of the financial statements. 

˜˜

˜˜

We primarily focus our work in these areas by assessing the directors’ judgements against available evidence, forming our own 
judgements, and evaluating the disclosures in the financial statements.

We test and examine information, using sampling and other auditing techniques, to the extent we consider necessary to provide 
a reasonable basis for us to draw conclusions. We obtain audit evidence through testing the effectiveness of controls, substantive 
procedures or a combination of both. 

In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information in the Annual Report to identify material inconsistencies with the 
audited financial statements and to identify any information that is apparently materially incorrect based on, or materially inconsistent 
with, the knowledge acquired by us in the course of performing the audit. If we become aware of any apparent material misstatements or 
inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report. With respect to the Strategic report and Directors’ report, we consider whether 
those reports include the disclosures required by applicable legal requirements.

Sam Taylor (Senior Statutory Auditor)
for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors
Reading
15 May 2017

36    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    37

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
for the year ended 31 December 2016

Consolidated statement of financial position
as at 31 December 2016

(Loss) income for the year 

Other comprehensive income 

Items that may be reclassified subsequently 

to profit or loss if certain conditions are met 

Foreign currency translation differences 

Total comprehensive (expense) income for the year 

2016 
£’000 

2016 
£’000 

2016 
£’000 

2015 
£’000 

2015 
£’000 

2015
£’000

Before  Exceptional 

exceptional 
items 

items      
(note 4) 

Before  Exceptional 
items 
(note 4) 

exceptional 
items 

Total 

Total

(12,356) 

(313) 

(12,669) 

(20,610) 

559 

(20,051)

7,347 

(5,009) 

– 

7,347 

1,869 

(313) 

(5,322) 

(18,741) 

– 

559 

1,869

(18,182)

The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.

Assets 
Non-current assets 
Intangible assets 
Property, plant and equipment 
Trade and other receivables 
Available-for-sale investment  
Investment in associate 

Current assets 
Inventories 
Trade and other receivables 
Current income tax asset 
Derivative financial instruments 
Short term investments – funds held on deposit 
Cash and cash equivalents 

Total assets 

Liabilities 
Current liabilities 
Trade and other payables 
Borrowings 

Non-current liabilities 
Trade and other payables 
Borrowings 

Total liabilities 

Net assets 

Capital and reserves attributable to owners of Velocys plc 
Called up share capital 
Share premium account 
Merger reserve 
Share-based payments reserve 
Foreign exchange reserve 
Accumulated losses 

Total equity 

Note 

17 
18 
21 
20 
20 

22 
21 

27 
23 
23 

24 
26 

25 
26 

29 
29 

2016 
£’000 

34,035 
5,637 
325 
– 
5,865 

45,862 

1,461 
811 
854 
537 
– 
18,744 

22,407 

68,269 

(2,272) 
(323) 

(2,595) 

(1,343) 
(593) 

(1,936) 

(4,531) 

63,738 

1,438 
149,275 
369 
15,843 
7,065 
(110,252) 

63,738 

2015
£’000

28,378
5,507
–
3,375
–

37,260

1,393
911
780
156
3,000
34,736

40,976

78,236

(7,380)
(288)

(7,668)

(1,327)
(759)

(2,086)

(9,754)

68,482

1,419
149,197
369
15,362
(282)
(97,583)

68,482

The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements. 

The financial statements on pages 37 to 74 were approved by the Board of directors and authorised for issue on 15 May 2017.  
They were signed on its behalf by: 

Susan Robertson 
Chief Financial Officer

Company number 05712187

38    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    39

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Velocys plc statement of financial position 
as at 31 December 2016

Consolidated statement of changes in equity
for the year ended 31 December 2016

Assets 
Non-current assets 
Investments in subsidiaries 

Current assets 
Trade and other receivables 
Current income tax asset 

Total assets 

Current liabilities 
Trade and other payables 

Total liabilities 

Net assets 

Capital and reserves attributable to owners of Velocys plc 
Called up share capital 
Share premium account 
Share-based payment reserve 
Accumulated losses 

Total equity 

Note  

19 

21 

24 

29 
29 

2016 
£’000 

66,831 

31 
650 

67,512 

(72) 

(72) 

67,440 

1,438 
149,275 
15,843 
(99,116) 

67,440 

2015
£’000

126,289

32
600

126,921

(140)

(140)

126,781

1,419
149,197
15,362
(39,197)

126,781

The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.

The Company has elected to take the exemption under Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 not to present the parent company Income 
statement and Statement of comprehensive income. The comprehensive loss for the parent company for the year was £59,919,000  
(2015: loss £5,433,000), which included a £65,716,000 impairment of investment in subsidiary in 2016 (2015: £nil) see note 19.

The financial statements on pages 37 to 74 were approved by the Board of directors and authorised for issue on 15 May 2017.  
They were signed on its behalf by:

Called up 
share 
capital 
£’000 

Share 
premium 
account 
£’000 

  Share-based 
payment 
reserve 
£’000 

Merger 
reserve 
£’000 

Foreign

exchange  Accumulated 
losses 
 £’000 

reserve 
£’000 

Total
equity
£’000

Balance at 1 January 2015 

1,419 

149,225 

369 

13,220 

(2,151) 

(77,532) 

84,550

Comprehensive income 
Loss for the year 
Other comprehensive income 
Foreign currency translation differences 

Total comprehensive expense 

Transactions with owners 
Share-based payments – value of employee services 
Employee benefit trust reimbursement 

Total transactions with owners 

– 

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 
(28) 

(28) 

– 

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

2,142 
– 

2,142 

– 

(20,051) 

(20,051)

1,869 

1,869 

– 

1,869

(20,051) 

(18,182)

– 
– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

2,142
(28)

2,114

Balance at 1 January 2016 

1,419 

149,197 

369 

15,362 

(282) 

(97,583) 

68,482

Comprehensive income 
Loss for the year 
Other comprehensive income 
Foreign currency translation differences 

Total comprehensive expense 

Transactions with owners 
Share-based payments – value of employee services 
Proceeds from share issues 
Employee option tax liability settled by the Company 

Total transactions with owners 

– 

– 

– 

– 
19 
– 

19 

– 

– 

– 

– 
78 
–  

78 

– 

– 

– 

– 
– 
– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

793 
– 
(312) 

481 

– 

(12,669) 

(12,669)

7,347 

7,347 

– 

(12,669) 

7,347

(5,322)

– 
– 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 

– 

793
97
(312)

578

Balance at 31 December 2016 

1,438 

149,275 

369 

15,843 

7,065 

(110,252) 

63,738

The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.

Susan Robertson 
Chief Financial Officer

Company number 05712187 

40    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    41

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Velocys plc statement of changes in equity 
for the year ended at 31 December 2016

Consolidated statement of cash flows 
for the year ended 31 December 2016

Balance at 1 January 2015 

Comprehensive income 
Loss for the year 

Total comprehensive expense 

Transactions with owners 
Share-based payments – value of employee services 
Employee benefit trust reimbursement 

Total transactions with owners 

Balance at 1 January 2016 

Comprehensive income 
Loss for the year 

Total comprehensive income 

Transactions with owners 
Share-based payments – value of employee services 
Proceeds from share issues 
Employee option tax liability settled by the Company  

Total transactions with owners 

Balance at 31 December 2016 

Share  Share-based 

Called up 
  share capital 
£’000 

premium 
account  
£’000 

payment  Accumulated 
losses 
£’000 

reserve 
£’000 

Total
 equity
£’000

1,419 

149,225 

13,220 

(33,764) 

130,100

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 

– 

– 
(28) 

(28) 

– 

– 

2,142 
– 

2,142 

(5,433) 

(5,433) 

– 
– 

– 

(5,433)

(5,433)

2,142
(28)

2,114

1,419 

149,197 

15,362 

(39,197) 

126,781

– 

– 

– 
19 
– 

19 

– 

– 

– 
78 
– 

78 

– 

– 

793 
– 
(312) 

481 

(59,919) 

(59,919) 

(59,919)

(59,919)

– 
– 
– 

– 

793
97
(312)

578

1,438 

149,275 

15,843 

(99,116) 

67,440

The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.

Note 

Cash flows from operating activities 
Operating loss before taxation 
Depreciation and amortisation 
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment 
Loss on disposal of intangible assets 
Impairment of intangible assets 
Write-down of deferred consideration and deferred tax liability 
Share-based payments 
Loss on derivative financial instruments 
Employee option tax liability settled by the Company 
Changes in working capital (excluding the effects of exchange differences on consolidation)   
– Trade and other receivables 
– Trade and other payables 
– Inventory 

Cash consumed by operations 
Tax credits received 

Net cash used in operating activities 

Cash flows from investing activities 
Purchase of property, plant and equipment 
Purchase of intangible assets 
Equity investment in ENVIA 
Loan to ENVIA  
Interest received 
Decrease in funds placed on deposit  

Net cash generated from investing activities 

Cash flows from financing activities 
(Employee benefit trust reimbursement) net proceeds of issuance of ordinary shares 
Proceeds from share issues 
Interest paid 
Decrease in borrowings 

Net cash used in financing activities 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 
Exchange gains on cash and cash equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 

The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.

23 

26 

23 

23 

2016 
£’000 

(17,085) 
1,323 
1 
233 
– 
– 
793 
– 
(312) 

234 
(6,004) 
138 

(20,679) 
1,330 

(19,349) 

(291) 
(356) 
(1,903) 
(295) 
136 
3,000 

291 

– 
6 
(26) 
(314) 

(334) 

(19,392) 
34,736 
3,400 

18,744 

2015
£’000

(22,188)
1,277
5
383
1,473
(2,032)
2,142
279
–

(301)
(975)
(1,066)

(21,003)
2,031

(18,972)

(2,262)
(395)
(1,535)
–
401
25,083

21,292

(28)
–
(33)
(271)

(332)

1,988
31,693
1,055

34,736

42    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    43

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Velocys plc statement of cash flows 
for the year ended 31 December 2016

Notes to the financial statements

Cash flows from operating activities 
Operating loss before taxation 
Impairment of subsidiaries 
Employee option tax liability settled by the Company 
Changes in working capital (excluding the effects of exchange differences on consolidation) 
– Trade and other receivables 
– Intercompany balances 
– Trade and other payables 

Cash consumed by operations 
Tax credit received 

Net cash generated from operating activities 

Cash flow from investing activities 
Interest received 

Net cash generated from investing activities 

Cash flows from financing activities 
(Employee benefit trust reimbursement) net proceeds of issuance of ordinary shares 
Proceeds from share issues 

Net cash used in financing activities 

Net movement in cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 

The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.

2016 
£’000 

(72,485) 
65,716 
(312) 

(68) 
6,066 
1 

(1,082) 
1,070 

(12) 

6 

6 

– 
6 

6 

– 
– 

– 

2015
£’000

(8,956)
–
–

55
7,310
46

(1,545)
1,573

28

–

–

(28)
–

(28)

–
–

–

1.  General information
Velocys plc is a company incorporated in England and Wales and domiciled in England. It operates through a number of subsidiaries  
in the UK and the US, and collectively they are referred to in the financial statements as the “Company” or “Velocys”, with Velocys plc  
as “Velocys plc” or the “parent company”. The nature of the Company’s operations and its principal activities are set out in the Strategic 
report on pages 1 to 21 and the Directors’ report on pages 28 and 29.

The parent company is a public limited company listed on AIM.

2.  Accounting policies
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated and parent company financial statements are 
summarised below. The policies have been consistently applied to each year presented unless otherwise stated.

Basis of preparation
The consolidated and parent company financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting 
Standards as adopted by the European Union (IFRSs as adopted by the EU), IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRS IC) Interpretations and 
the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS. The statements have been prepared under the historical cost 
convention as modified by the revaluation of certain financial assets and liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value.

The preparation of financial statements to conform to IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates and the exercise 
of management’s estimate in the application of the Company’s accounting policies. Areas involving a higher degree of judgement or 
complexity, and areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements are referenced in note 3.

Going concern
The financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which assumes that the Company will have sufficient funds 
available to enable it to continue to trade for the foreseeable future. The nature of the Company’s nascent strategy means that the timing of 
milestones and funds generated from developments are difficult to predict at this stage. Management has prepared financial forecasts to 
estimate the likely cash requirements of the Company over the next 12 months. 

The forecasts include certain assumptions with regard to the following:
(a)  successful completion of the ENVIA Oklahoma project start up reaching full operational capacity within 2017 leading to sustainable 

stable operations and the subsequent operating cash flows arising from its interest in and commitments to this project. 
(b)  the costs of ongoing development projects coupled with the Company's ability to reduce certain existing overhead costs.
(c)  the Company raising additional funding during 2018, without which the Company will have a funding shortfall by the second quarter 

of 2018. The directors continue to review possible sources of additional funding which may include Company level equity, project level 
funding and third party licence sales, although at the time of the approval of the financial statements there are no agreements in place 
beyond the £10 million fund raise announced in May 2017.

Based on these assumptions, the forecasts show that there is sufficient funding in the Company to continue their activities for the 
foreseeable future being not less than 12 months from the date of approval of these financial statements and the directors have 
therefore prepared the financial statements on a going concern basis.

However, there are uncertainties in these assumptions, including the costs and timing of completion of the ENVIA start up, the amount of 
costs of ongoing development projects, the ability to reduce certain overheads, the ability to raise additional funding, and adverse variations 
in these assumptions would mean that the Company may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of 
business. These conditions indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the Company’s ability to 
continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include the adjustments that may be required if the Company was unable to 
continue as a going concern.

Accounting developments
No new standards, amendments or interpretations, effective for the first time for the financial year beginning on or after 1 January 2016 
have had a material impact on the Company or Velocys plc.

The following new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations are mandatory for the first time for the financial year 
beginning 1 January 2017. The Company has not chosen to early adopt these standards, but they are considered relevant for future 
accounting periods.
˜˜ Amendment to IAS 7, ‘Statement of cash flows’ on disclosure initiative. These amendments to IAS 7 introduce an additional disclosure that 
will enable users of financial statements to evaluate changes in liabilities arising from financing activities. The amendment is part of the 
IASB’s Disclosure Initiative, which continues to explore how financial statement disclosure can be improved. 

˜˜

The following new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations are mandatory for the first time for the financial year 
beginning 1 January 2018. The Company has not chosen to early adopt these standards, but they are considered relevant for future 
accounting periods.
˜˜

IFRS 9, ‘Financial instruments’. The Company is continuing to assess the impact of IFRS 9; it is not anticipated that adoption of the standard 
will have a significant impact on the financial statements. 
IFRS 15, ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. This converged standard will improve the financial reporting of revenue and improve 
comparability of the top line in financial statements globally. Companies using IFRS will be required to apply the revenue standard for 
reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. The Company continues to review the requirements of IFRS 15 Revenue from 
contracts with customers. It has identified the revenue streams expected to be impacted and the performance obligations due under 
their respective contracts. It does not believe that allocating the contract prices across these performance obligations will have a material 
impact to the Income statement. In respect of 2016 revenue, which was all from engineering services, it would not result in any adjustment. 
The Company has not chosen to early adopt the standard.

44    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    45

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

2.  Accounting policies (continued) 
Accounting developments (continued)
The following new standard is mandatory for the first time for the financial year beginning 1 January 2019. This standard is subject to 
endorsement by the European Union.
˜˜

IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. This standard will replace IAS 17 ‘Leases’ and sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation  
and disclosure of leases. Lessees will be required to recognise a lease liability reflecting future lease payments and a right-of-use asset  
for lease contracts. The IASB has included an optional exemption that can be applied by lessees for certain short-term leases and leases 
of low-value assets. A key change arising from IFRS 16 is that most operating leases will be accounted for on the balance sheet for lessees. 
As outlined in note 30, at 31 December 2016 the Company has £1,829,000 of operating lease commitments and these are likely to be 
recognised on the balance sheet as at transition. The standard replaces IAS 17 ‘Leases’, and related interpretations.

Financial risk management policies
Financial risk management policies are set out in the Strategic report on page 21, and in note 28.

Capital management policies
Capital management policies are set out in note 28.

Significant accounting policies
Foreign currency translation
Functional and presentation currency 
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Company’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic 
environment in which the entity operates (the functional currency). The consolidated financial statements are presented in sterling (£), 
which is Velocys plc’s functional and the Company’s presentation currency.

Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. 
Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of 
monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the Income statement. Foreign exchange gains and losses 
that relate to borrowings and cash and cash equivalents are presented in the Income statement within Finance income or Finance costs. 

The net investment that the Company has in its subsidiary undertakings is its interest in the net assets of that subsidiary. The inclusion of 
long-term loans and receivables ("Loans to subsidiaries") as part of the net investment in the subsidiary undertaking is determined where 
settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future. All loans to subsidiaries by the parent company meet these criteria. 

On this basis the loans to subsidiaries, being monetary items that are receivable from a foreign subsidiary undertaking, are regarded  
as an extension of the Company's net investment in that foreign subsidiary undertaking. Exchange differences, arising on a monetary item that 
forms part of the Company's net investment in a foreign operation that is a subsidiary or associate, are recorded as follows.
˜˜

In the consolidated financial statements that include the foreign operation and the reporting entity, exchange differences are recognised 
initially in a separate component of Other comprehensive income and, on disposal of the net investment, in profit or loss.
In the parent company financial statements, exchange differences are recognised in the Income statement.

˜˜

Entities within Velocys 
The results and financial position of all Velocys entities that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency  
(none of which is of a hyper-inflationary economy) are translated into the presentation currency as follows:
1.  assets and liabilities for each balance sheet presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of that balance sheet;
2. 
3.  all resulting exchange differences are recognised as a movement within other comprehensive income.

income and expenses for each income statement are translated at average exchange rates; and

3.  Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial information in conformity with IFRS requires the use of estimates and judgements that affect the reported 
amounts of assets and liabilities at the reporting date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. 
Although these estimates and judgements are based on management’s best knowledge of the amount, event or action, actual results 
ultimately may differ. Estimates and judgements that have a significant risk of causing material adjustment to the carrying amounts of 
assets and liabilities within the next financial period are discussed in the relevant note and listed below.

Item of critical estimate and/or judgement 
Note

Exceptional items – recognition of previously deferred income 
Intangible assets – impairment assessment 
Investment in subsidiaries – impairment assessment 
Recognition of investment in associate 

4
17
19
20

4.  Exceptional items
Items that are significant by virtue of their size or nature, which are considered non-recurring and which are excluded from the underlying 
profit measures used by the Board to monitor and measure the underlying performance of the Company are classified as exceptional 
operating items. They include, for instance, costs directly attributable to the integration of an acquired business, significant site 
consolidation costs and other significant restructuring costs. Exceptional operating items are included within the appropriate  
Consolidated income statement category but are highlighted separately in the notes to the financial statements. 

The following exceptional items have been included in the Consolidated income statement.

Costs of unsuccessful acquisition 
Recognition of previously deferred income  
Impairment of intangible assets 
Deferred tax liability write down 
Deferred consideration release 

Total 

2016 
£’000 

(2,809) 
2,496 
– 
– 
– 

(313) 

2015
£’000

–
–
(1,473)
269
1,763

559

In 2016, the Company sought to acquire certain assets of a US-based GTL company that had gone into administration but did not 
complete the acquisition. The Company received a partial reimbursement by the acquirer of the plant. This transaction was judged to be 
exceptional by its nature as a potential business combination. Costs of the unsuccessful acquisition in the table above represent amounts 
spent net of the related reimbursement.

The Company recognised £2,496,000 of previously deferred income in respect of the cancellation of a contract with Ventech for reactors. 
The deferred income arose on receipt of upfront payments. The full amount was recognised as Other income. It has been included  
in exceptional items as it was a significant, one-off change to a material contract.

The impairment of intangible assets in 2015 related to customer contracts, and was the discounted value of future income, which the 
Company had expected to receive in 2015 upon obtaining a final investment decision (FID) by outside investors in the Ashtabula project.  
As FID was not reached in 2015, this balance and the related deferred tax liability were written down to £nil. 

On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign operations are taken to  
shareholders’ equity.

The deferred consideration arrangement required the Company to issue shares in Velocys plc to the former owners of Velocys Project 
Solutions, also contingent upon the achievement of FID at Ashtabula. It was written down to £nil in 2015 and no shares were issued. 

Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity 
and translated at the closing rate.

Other significant accounting policies are incorporated in the note to which they apply.

Critical estimates and judgements
The recognition as income in 2016 of non-refundable amounts from Ventech previously recorded in deferred income is based on an 
assessment of the contractual position, taking into account both the terms of the original contract and subsequent amendments. 
The Company believes that all obligations under this contract have been fulfilled and therefore that it is probable that the economic 
benefits associated with the transaction have flowed to the Company and that recognition of the related income is appropriate. 
This is a binary judgement, and, therefore, the Company has recognised revenue at the point at which the probability criterion was met.

46    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    47

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

5.  Segmental information
The Company’s chief operating decision-making unit is the Senior Management Team (SMT). The SMT reviews the Company’s internal 
reporting in order to assess performance and allocate resources, and has determined the operating segments based on these reports.

The SMT considers that the business comprises a single activity, which is the design, development, marketing and sale of technology 
for the production of synthetic fuels (and speciality products). The newly announced strategy extends this activity to facilitating project 
development by putting together partnerships with technology licensors, engineers, feedstock suppliers, off-takers and financing entities. 
However, this is still considered to be part of the same synthetic fuels activity. The SMT reviews the Company’s profit or loss and its cash 
flows, assets and liabilities on a Company-wide basis. In carrying out these reviews, the SMT considers all material items of income and 
expenditure that are directly attributable to individual commercial projects and development programmes. The internal management 
reports do not allocate assets and liabilities or shared overheads to individual products or projects.

The business has one segment on the basis that the key end use market is that of synthetic fuels production. At this stage, the synthetic 
fuels segment represents 100% of the business and therefore represents the only material segment. Based on management’s judgement, 
all products and services offered within the operating segment have similar economic characteristics. 

Internal and external reporting is on a consolidated basis, with purchases and sales between subsidiaries eliminated on consolidation. 
Therefore, the segmental and financial information is the same as that set out in the Consolidated income statement, Consolidated 
statement of comprehensive income, the Consolidated statement of financial position, the Consolidated statement of cash flows and  
the Consolidated statement of changes in equity.

The SMT assesses the performance of the operating segment based on a measure of operating loss.

The Company’s operating segment operates in three main geographical areas. Revenue is allocated based on the country in which the 
customer is located.

Europe 
Americas 
Asia Pacific 

Total revenue  

2016 
£’000 

273 
1,163 
9 

1,445 

Revenues during the year originated in the United Kingdom and United States.

The total amount of revenue recognised from customers where revenue comprises 10% or more of Company revenue is as follows:

Customer 1 
Customer 2* 
Customer 3 
Customers less than 10% 

Total revenue  

*  Relates to different customers in 2016 and 2015.

Non-current assets held in the United States are as follows:

Intangible assets 
Property, plant and equipment 
Trade and other receivable 
Available-for-sale investment  
Investment in associate 

Total 

2016 
£’000 

619 
444 
163 
219 

1,445 

2016 
£’000 

33,590 
5,355 
325 
– 
5,865 

45,135 

All other non-current assets were held in the United Kingdom and amounted to £727,000 (2015: £854,000).

2015
£’000

400
1,589
13

2,002

2015
£’000

1,480
400
–
122

2,002

2015
£’000

27,956
5,075
–
3,375
–

36,406

6.  Revenue 
Revenue is measured as the fair value of consideration received or receivable for goods and services provided in the normal course of 
business, net of trade discounts, value added tax and other sales-related taxes after eliminating sales within the Company. Revenue is 
recognised only when the amount of revenue can be reliably measured and it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the 
Company. When uncertainty subsequently arises, any resulting provision is recognised as an expense and not a reduction in revenue.

Revenue related to Fischer-Tropsch (FT) reactors, catalyst and licence
The purchase of an FT reactor is part of an integrated package consisting of the three revenue streams for the Company; the sale of the 
FT reactor, the use of the FT catalyst for a certain term and revenue from the licence fee that grants rights to use the related intellectual 
property (IP) for the length of the licence term. The IP is not transferred at the end of the licence term. 

In order to recognise revenue, each component of the FT process is identified, which includes the sale of the reactor, an initial licence fee, 
the sale of catalyst and ongoing engineering services. Values are based on the terms of the sales contract. Once the fair value  
of the components has been determined, revenue is recognised in line with the underlying nature of the contract.

FT reactor revenue and costs are recognised when substantially all risk and reward associated with the reactor has passed to the 
customer. Under the Company’s standard terms this is on delivery of the reactor, where “delivery” means available for shipping to the 
customer’s site, although this term may vary as contracts are negotiated.

Catalyst sales income will be recognised monthly over the term of the arrangement.

Licence fee revenue will be recognised on commencement of the contract provided that the fair value of the licence fee can be 
determined. However, if no reliable fair value can be determined, any revenue associated with the licence fee will be deferred and 
recognised in line with the reactor sales. Where a proportion of the licence fee is at risk until the successful completion of a performance 
test, this proportion is not recognised as revenue until the test is passed; any payments received are held in deferred income until that 
time.

Where the underlying costs associated with any component cannot be estimated, any profit element identified is deferred until such time 
as the costs can be reliably estimated.

Revenue related to engineering services
Revenue from engineering services is earned on a time and materials basis, and is recognised as the work is performed. 

As engineering services were the source of all 2016 revenue, no critical estimates were required.

The majority of the Company’s revenue is derived from a small number of significant commercial customers and development partners,  
who are not related parties. 

FT reactor, catalyst and licence 
Engineering services 

Total  

7.  Finance income

Interest income on bank deposits 
Net fair value gains on forward foreign exchange contracts 
Foreign exchange gains 

Total Finance income 

2016 
£’000 

– 
1,445 

1,445 

2016 
£’000 

129 
668 
2,547 

3,344 

Interest income is accrued on a time basis by reference to the principal outstanding and the applicable interest rate.

8.  Finance costs

Unwinding of discount on deferred licence payments payable 
Interest on finance leases 
Interest on borrowings 

Total Finance costs 

2016 
£’000 

–  
5 
21 

26 

2015
£’000

1,820
182

2,002

2015
£’000

329
381
445

1,155

2015
£’000

20
9
24

53

48    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    49

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

9.  Other income
Other income consists of items such as sales of fixed assets, contractual and legal settlements and any other operating income 
recognised outside of commercial activities. Other income derived from sales of fixed assets and non-commercial activities is recognised 
on an accruals basis. Legal settlements are recognised as income when a final judgement is received. 

12.  Employee benefit expense
Short term employee benefits
Accruals are included to reflect the cost of short term compensation to employees for absences such as paid leave.

Before exceptional items: 
Contractual and legal settlements 
Sale of fixed assets 

Total other income before exceptional items 

Exceptional items (see note 4): 
Recognition of deferred income 
Deferred consideration release 

Total other income exceptional items 

Total other income 

2016 
£’000 

252 
20 

272 

2,496 
– 

2,496 

2,768 

2015
£’000

1,996
13

2,009

–
1,763

1,763

3,772

In 2016 Other income included receipts from settlements with Toyo and MODEC, which offset costs previously recorded in Administrative 
expenses, and the recognition of deferred income in respect of cancellation of the Ventech contract (see note 4).

In 2015 Other income included receipt of settlements arising from two legal disputes, with CompactGTL and Johnson Matthey, 
which offset previously recorded Administrative expenses and the release of deferred consideration that would have been due 
to the former owners of Velocys Project Solutions if FID been achieved at Ashtabula in 2015 (see note 4). 

10. Expenses by nature

Employee benefit expense (see note 12) 
Sub-contractor and consultant costs 
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment: owned (note 18) 
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment: leased (note 18) 
Amortisation of intangible assets (note 17) 
Operating lease expense – plant and machinery 
Operating lease expense – other 
Patent and other IP costs 
Materials expense 
Services 
Inventories write-down 
Other expenses 

Total cost of sales and administrative expenses before exceptional items 

2016 
£’000 

10,212 
1,837 
1,077 
55 
191 
72 
517 
313 
642 
677 
148 
2,748 

18,489 

Included in administrative expenses were research and development costs of £10,075,000 (2015: £13,199,000).

11.  Auditor’s remuneration

Fees payable to Company’s auditor and its associates for the audit of parent company  

and consolidated financial statements 

Fees payable to Company’s auditor and its associates for other services: 
– The audit of Company’s subsidiaries  
– Taxation compliance service 

Total 

2016 
£’000 

78 

39 
25 

142 

2015
£’000

13,480
2,385
975
50
252
31
475
579
3,924
738
218
3,651

26,758

2015
£’000

62

31
13

106

Pensions
The Company operates various defined contribution pension schemes for its employees. The Company has no legal or constructive 
obligations to pay further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employees the benefit derived from the 
current and prior periods.

The amount charged to the Income statement in respect of pension costs and other post-retirement benefits is the contributions payable  
in the year. Differences between contributions payable and contributions actually paid are shown as accruals in the balance sheet.  
The Company has no further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid.

The average monthly number of Company employees (including Executive Directors) was as follows.

Research, design and development 
Administration 

Total average headcount 

Their aggregate remuneration comprised the following items.

Wages and salaries 
Social security costs 
Other pension costs 
Severance expense 
Share-based payments granted to directors and employees (note 15) 

Total remuneration 

The parent company has no employees and no remuneration.

2016  
number 

65 
25 

90 

2016 
£’000 

8,312 
673 
314 
120 
793 

10,212 

2015
number

79
29

108

2015
£’000

9,822
679
326
511
2,142

13,480

Details of directors’ remuneration are given in the audited information in the Directors’ remuneration report on pages 30 to 33, which forms 
part of these financial statements.

Included in wages and salaries were costs for research and development employees of £5,256,000 (2015: £6,011,000).

13. Income tax
Current tax, including UK corporation tax and foreign tax, is provided for at the amount expected to be paid (or recovered) based on the tax 
rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.

Company 

Current tax: 
R&D tax credit relating to prior years 
R&D tax credit relating to current year 

Current tax total 

Deferred tax: 
Write off of intangible assets 

Income tax total 

2016 
£’000 

(550) 
(854) 

(1,404) 

– 

(1,404) 

2015
£’000

(255)
(780)

(1,035)

269

(766)

Due to the availability of losses incurred in the year, there is no charge to corporation tax. The Company recognised £1,404,000 for R&D tax 
credits (2015: £1,035,000). The credit relating to the current year is on an accruals basis, which is an estimate of the amount to be claimed 
from HMRC based on the activity level and significant R&D costs of the current year compared to previous years. The credit relating to 
prior years is the difference between the brought forward accrual and the settlement from HMRC.

The accrual for the current year, which is the majority of the credit, is based on an assessment of the Company’s projects, to determine 
which ones qualify under the HMRC’s rules, and to estimate the level of allowable cost within each, based on the nature of costs.

50    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    51

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

13. Income tax (continued)
The actual tax credit for the current and previous year is higher (2015: higher) than the theoretical amount that would arise using the 
weighted average tax rate applicable to the results of the consolidated entities, for the reasons set out in the following reconciliation.

Company 

Loss before income tax 

Tax calculated at domestic tax rates applicable to losses in the respective countries 

Tax effects of: 
− Expenses not deductible for tax purposes 
− Unutilised tax losses 
− R&D tax credit 

Current tax total 

2016 
£’000 

(14,073) 

(4,147) 

51 
4,096 
(1,404) 

(1,404) 

2015
£’000

(21,086)

(5,594)

468
5,126
(1,035)

(1,035)

The weighted average applicable tax rate was 29.5% (2015: 26.5%).

The standard rate of corporation tax in the United Kingdom changed from 21% to 20% with effect from 1 April 2015. Accordingly, 
profits in the United Kingdom for 2016 were taxed at 20%. Legislation to reduce the main rate of corporation tax to 19% from 1 April 2017 
was enacted on 18 November 2015. Legislation to further reduce the rate to 17% from 1 April 2020 was enacted on 15 September 2016. 
Unrecognised UK deferred tax balances have been measured at 17% (recognised: £nil).

US corporate income tax is based on a graduated scale ranging from 15% to 35% tax rate depending on the level of taxable income.  
Most US companies with taxable income under $10,000,000 have an effective rate of 34%. Unrecognised US deferred tax balances have 
been measured at 34% (recognised: £nil).

14. Deferred tax
Deferred tax is recognised, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax basis of assets and liabilities  
and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax is not accounted for if it arises from initial recognition 
of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction affected neither accounting 
nor taxable profit or loss. Tax amounts are determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the 
balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realised or the deferred income tax liability  
is settled.

Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the 
temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries
except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the parent company and it is probable that the 
temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

The movement in deferred tax in the year was as follows.

Company 

Recognised 
Deferred tax liability 
Write off of intangible assets 

Deferred tax carried forward 

Company 

Unrecognised 
Deferred tax assets 
− Trading losses 
− Equity settled options 

Total 

2016 
£’000 

– 
– 

– 

2016 
£’000 

(27,366) 
(195) 

(27,561) 

2015
£’000

269
(269)

–

2015
£’000

(22,918)
(605)

(23,523)

15.  Share-based payments
Velocys plc issues share options to employees of its subsidiaries that are accounted for as equity settled. There are a number of schemes 
covering employees, executives and external consultants; most are based on a service period but some include performance conditions, 
both market based and non-market based.

Options are measured at fair value (excluding the effect of non market-based vesting conditions) at the date of grant. For executive 
options with market performance conditions attached the Monte Carlo pricing model is used, all other options apply the Black-Scholes 
model.

The basic assumptions that feed into both models are volatility of the share price, annual risk free rate and dividend yield. Volatility 
is estimated using the average daily share price from the previous five years, the risk free rate is based on the Bank of England’s yield 
curve tables, and it is assumed no dividend will be paid over the life of the option. Additionally, for the Monte Carlo model, expected life is 
assumed to be the earliest point at which the shares may vest. This has been adjusted, using management’s best estimate, for the effects 
of non-transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioural considerations. 

At the end of each reporting period, the Company revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to vest, based on  
non-market vesting conditions and service calculations. It recognises the impact of the revision to original estimates in the Income 
statement, recorded in Administrative expenses, with a corresponding adjustment to equity.

When options are exercised the Company issues new shares; proceeds received, net of attributable transaction costs, are credited to 
share capital and premium.

For the parent company, grants of options are treated as a capital contribution to the subsidiary of which the option holder is an employee. 
The share based payment expense is recognised as an additional investment in the subsidiary with a corresponding credit to equity.

The number of options outstanding at 31 December 2016 and the expense recognised in the profit or loss for these schemes, along with 
bonus shares and other schemes, are as follows. 

Scheme 

Employees UK/US 
ELTIP (Executives) 
Velocys, Inc. 
Bonus shares 
Other 

Total 

Options 
outstanding 

3,228,556 
8,166,548 
83,248 
79,760 
253,879 

11,811,991 

2016 

Income 
statement 
£’000 

275 
496 
– 
– 
22 

793 

Options 
 outstanding 

4,188,283 
10,912,628 
95,978 
421,760 
253,879 

15,872,528 

2015

Income
statement
 £’000

281
1,843
–
–
18

2,142

Employees UK/US
This scheme covers all employees of the Company, and was previously referred to as the EMI scheme; however, the Company ceased  
to qualify for EMI status due to the value of its gross assets. 

Options are granted to employees when they join the Company, they vest three, four or five years from the date of joining, subject to the 
employee completing a corresponding service period, and expire after ten years. The exercise price is the mid-market value of Velocys plc’s 
ordinary shares on the day prior to grant. Options are fair valued at grant date using the Black-Scholes model, and expensed over  
the vesting period.

During 2015 options were granted to certain employees that will vest in January 2017 subject to meeting certain non-market performance 
conditions; other conditions are per the main employee scheme. The fair value assessment of these options included a review of the likely 
fulfilment of the performance conditions.

Movements in the number of options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise prices are as follows.

Weighted  
average 
 exercise price 

109.60p 
28.86p 
131.47p 
81.29p 

121.26p 

2016 

Number of 
 options 

4,188,283 
104,615 
(1,062,332)  
(2,000) 

3,228,566 

Weighted
average 
 exercise price  

119.33p 
107.09p 
161.30p 
59.16p 

109.60p 

2015

Number of
options

4,179,111
1,159,173
(1,138,335)
(11,666)

4,188,283

At 31 December 2016 the Company had a net unrecognised deferred tax asset of £27,366,000 (2015: £22,918,000) arising from trading 
losses since incorporation. No recognition (2015: £nil) of the net deferred tax asset has been made at 31 December 2016 on the grounds  
of uncertainty over its recoverability in light of the Company’s nascent revenue streams and commitment to continued investment in 
research and development and therefore there is no impact on the current or prior year income statement.

Of this unrecognised deferred tax asset, £11,775,000 (2015: £16,580,000 reported, £11,733,000 restated) is anticipated to remain 
available indefinitely to offset against future taxable trading profits of the entities in which the losses arose. The remainder has expiry 
dates between 2023 and 2036 (2015: 2023 and 2035).

At 1 January 
Granted 
Forfeited 
Exercised 

At 31 December 

The amount of the above net unrecognised deferred tax asset attributable to the parent company was £8,381,000 (2015: £8,278,000),  
all of which is anticipated to remain available indefinitely (2015: all).

Of the 3,228,566 options outstanding at 31 December 2016, 1,875,442 were exercisable (2015: 1,371,533). The weighted average exercise 
price of the exercisable shares was 57.88p (2015: 71.38p).

52    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    53

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

15.  Share-based payments (continued)
Options outstanding at the end of the year have the following expiry dates and exercise prices.

Movements in the number of options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise prices are as follows. 

Year of expiry 

Range of  
exercise price 

Number of 
 options 

2017 
2018 
2020 
2021 
2022 
2023 
2024 
2025 
2026 

Total 

124.00p 
159.00p 
57.50 – 70.72p 
51.00 – 74.79p 
48.00 – 117.06p 
129.88 – 213.79p 
146.00 – 303.54p 
62.50 – 182.90p 
29.75 – 40.65p 

16,129 
62,893 
42,616 
1,024,140 
425,000 
494,000 
293,334 
775,839 
94,615 

29.75– 303.54p  

3,228,566 

2016 

Weighted 
average 
 exercise price 

124.00p 
159.00p 
68.83p 
68.09p 
93.08p 
200.73p 
227.39p 
126.83p 
31.91p 

121.26p 

2015

Weighted
average
exercise price

124.00p
159.00p
58.55p
59.72p
79.19p
168.18p
196.17p
106.88p
–

109.60p

Number of 
options 

16,129 
62,893 
51,748 
1,316,140 
468,200 
514,000 
603,334 
1,155,839 
– 

4,188,283 

The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year was13.65p (2015: 29.32p) per option. The significant inputs into the 
model were as follows.

Weighted average share price at grant date 
Weighted average exercise price 
Expected volatility 
Weighted average annual risk free rate 
Dividend yield 
Weighted average expected life 

2016 

28.86 
28.86 
54% 
0.4% 
0% 
4.0 years 

2015

107.09
107.09
44%
0.8%
0%
2.9 years

Total expense recognised in the income statement for share options granted to directors and employees was £275,000 (2015: £281,000).

Executive options
Executive options (also referred to as “ELTIP” in the Directors’ remuneration report, and “ELTIP” and “NELTIP” in the 2015 Annual report and 
accounts) are awarded to Executive Directors and senior managers of the Company.

The fair value of options is recognised from the start of the relevant service period to the end of the vesting period.

Executive options granted up to and including 2014, are exercisable at a price of 1p or at a price equal to the mid-market value of the 
parent company’s ordinary shares on the day prior to the grant. Options vest immediately or after a period of one, two or three years 
from grant, they expire after ten years and are forfeited if the employee leaves the Company before the options vest.

Options, including Restricted Stock Units (RSUs), awarded after 2014 were divided into those with a service period and those with market 
performance conditions. Except for the former CEO, service period options represented 23% of the award; they vest two years after 
the conclusion of the period over which performance is measured; the market performance conditions on which the rest of the award 
was based pertain to the compound annual growth rate of the Company’s market capitalisation excluding fund raising subsequent to 
1 January 2015; market performance options are measurable after three years from the start of the service period, with possible  
re-measurements one, and two years later; options are subject to the discretion of the Board if the employee leaves the Company 
before the options vest.

For the former CEO, a five-year award was made in 2015, for which service period options represented 30% of the RSUs. Market 
performance options were measurable after five years from the start of the service period, with a possible re-measurement one year later. 
Under the terms of the 2015 Settlement Agreement between the Company and the former CEO, 2,216,666 RSUs from this award were 
deemed to have vested; the remainder was forfeited. In 2016 it was agreed that only 1,330,000 of these RSUs would be transferred to the 
former CEO, and in respect of the balance, the Company would settle the expected associated tax liability.

No options have been granted in 2016 (2015: 8,364,386 options). However, the Remuneration Committee intends to introduce a new  
equity-based incentive scheme for executives in 2017, and, in the allocation of such awards, may take into consideration the fact that  
no 2016 awards were made. 

At 1 January 
Granted 
Forfeited 
Exercised 
At 31 December 

Weighted  
average 
exercise price 

64.23p 
– 
Nil 
0.15p 
84.92p 

2016 

Number of 
 options  

10,912,627 
– 
(1,176,079) 
(1,570,000) 
8,166,548 

Weighted
average 
exercise price 

110.71p 
98.10p 
Nil 
– 
69.70p 

2015

Number of
 options

9,526,635
8,364,386
(6,978,394)
–
10,912,627

Of the 8,166,548 options outstanding at 31 December 2016, 6,022,848 were exercisable (2015: 7,051,571). The weighted average exercise 
price of the exercisable shares was 115.14p (2015: 42.90p).

Share options and RSUs outstanding at the end of the year have the following expiry dates (RSU latest exercise dates) and exercise prices.

Year of expiry 

2016 
2017 
2018 
2019 
2020 
2021 
2022 
2023 
2024 

Total 

Range of  
exercise price 

Nil 
Nil 
Nil 
Nil – 1.00p 
Nil 
1.00p – 58.00p 
49.00p 
159.00p 
153.00p – 163.50p 

Nil – 163.50p 

Number of 
 options 

– 
135,558 
213,883 
524,680 
352,852 
1,175,000 
2,498,503 
1,841,837 
1,424,235 

8,166,548 

2016 

Weighted 
average 
exercise price 

Nil 
Nil 
Nil 
0.20p 
Nil 
39.05p 
49.00p 
159.00p 
163.04p 

84.92p 

2015

Weighted
average
exercise price

Nil
Nil
0.29p
0.35p
Nil
39.05p
49.00p
159.00p
162.72p

64.23p

Number of 
options 

2,216,667 
135,834 
343,639 
697,779 
532,134 
1,175,000 
2,498,503 
1,841,837 
1,471,235 

10,912,628 

No options have been granted in respect of 2016; the weighted average fair value of the market performance options and the service 
period options granted in 2015 was 108.13p per option. The significant inputs into the model were as follows.

Weighted average share price at grant date 
Weighted average exercise price 
Weighted average expected volatility 
Weighted average annual risk free rate 
Dividend yield 
Weighted average expected life 

2016 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

2015

155.00p
Nil
51%
0.79%
0%
2.68 years

Total expense recognised in the income statement for executive options granted to directors and employees was £496,000 in 2016 (2015: 
£1,843,000). No further expense was accrued within the share-based payments charge (2015: £nil).

At the time of exercising share options, executives of the Company may apply to an employee benefit trust managed by Oxford Catalysts 
Trustees Limited for a distribution in respect of the exercise value of their options. The trustees then request a contribution from the 
Company in respect of the grant made. The total value of funds distributed to executives by Oxford Catalysts Trustees Limited during the 
year in respect of executive options was £13,300 (2015: £nil).

54    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    55

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

15.  Share-based payments (continued)
Velocys, Inc. scheme 
The Velocys, Inc. Stock Compensation Plan (“Pre-Acquisition Scheme”) was acquired as part of the acquisition of Velocys, Inc. by Velocys 
plc, formerly Oxford Catalysts Group PLC, on 20 November 2008. The scheme was started in 2001 and covers all US-based employees. 
Prior to the acquisition, Velocys, Inc.’s Board of directors granted non-qualified share options to employees with expiry 10 years from grant 
date. The options’ exercise price was equal to the stock’s fair market value at the date of grant. Options are forfeited if an employee leaves 
the Company. Generally, options vest as follows.

After one year of service from vest start date: 
Each month subsequent to one year of service:  1/48th of grant

25% of grant

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the acquisition of Velocys, Inc., each vested and unvested Pre-Acquisition Scheme option existing 
on the acquisition date was converted into 0.3659 of a Velocys plc, formerly Oxford Catalyst Group PLC, option (the ratio of the value of 
one share of Velocys, Inc. stock to one share of Velocys plc, formerly Oxford Catalyst Group PLC stock) with a corresponding increase to the 
exercise price. Share options are exercisable in US dollars.

During 2011, the Company reviewed employee incentives and concluded that the Pre-Acquisition Scheme options did not provide the 
intended incentive or retention value for its employees due to significant shifts in the market price since the original grants. Consequently, 
holders of these options were offered the opportunity to forfeit their options and have new options issued. All such new issues vest in 
three years and expire ten years from date of grant.

Details of the share options outstanding under the Velocys, Inc. scheme are as follows.

At 1 January 
Forfeited 
Exercised 

At 31 December 

Weighted  
average  
exercise price 

$1.08 
$0.93 
$0.00 

$1.10 

2016 

Number of 
 options 

95,978 
(12,730) 
– 

83,248 

Weighted
average 
exercise price 

$1.00 
$0.82 
$0.77 

$1.08 

2015

Number of
 options

130,062
(21,503)
(12,581)

95,978

Of the options outstanding presented above, 83,248 (2015: 95,978) were exercisable as of 31 December 2016. The weighted average share 
price of the exercisable shares was $1.10 (2015: $1.08).

Share options outstanding at the end of the year have the following expiry dates and exercise prices.

Year of expiry 

2017 
2021 

Total 

Range of  
exercise price 
per share 

$2.21 – $2.54 
$0.93 

$0.77 – $2.54 

Number of 
options 

9,218 
74,030 

83,248 

2016 

Weighted 
average 
 exercise price 

$2.45 
$0.93 

$1.10 

2015

Weighted
average
 exercise price

$2.45
$0.93

$1.08

Number of 
options 

9,218 
86,760 

95,978 

Total expense recognised in the income statement for share options granted under the Velocys, Inc. plan was £nil (2015: £nil).

Bonus shares
The Company previously maintained two bonus share schemes for certain executives: one in respect of employees of Velocys Technologies 
Limited and one in respect of employees of Velocys, Inc. Under both schemes, the value of the bonus was based upon the executive’s salary 
as well as the Company and the executive achieving certain targets throughout the year. No awards were, or will be, made under these 
schemes during, or in respect of, 2016.

The Velocys Technologies Limited bonus share scheme awarded nominal value share options (1p) that were issued subsequent to the end 
of previous financial years. The awards vested on the date of grant and expire 10 years thereafter. Details of the bonus shares outstanding 
under the Velocys Technologies Limited bonus share scheme are as follows.

At 1 January 

Exercised 

At 31 December 

Exercise 
 price 

1.00p 

1.00p 

1.00p 

2016 

Number of 
 options 

421,760 

(342,000) 

79,760 

Exercise 
 price 

1.00p 

– 

1.00p 

Velocys Technologies Limited bonus share options outstanding at the end of the year have the following expiry dates.

Year of expiry 

2019 
2020 
2021 

Total 

 Exercise 
price 

1.00p 
1.00p 
1.00p 

1.00p 

2016 

Number of 
options 

42,105 
– 
37,655 

79,760 

2015

Number of
 options

421,760

–

421,760

2015

Number of
options

42,105
342,000
37,655

421,760

The Velocys, Inc. bonus share scheme consists of deferred shares awarded subsequent to year end at a nominal price of 1p. 20% of the 
award is due to be granted on each anniversary of the date of award. Shares remaining to be granted in future years totalled 16,418. 

No bonus share grants were made for either scheme in 2016 (2015: nil). All expense has been recognised prior to 2015. 

Other share options
The Board has approved the granting of share options to a small number of consultants (non-employees) who provide a strategic service  
to the business.

Options are granted either in respect of a completed service period, in which case they vest immediately, or in respect of a future service 
period, in which case they vest over periods of up to three years. They expire after 10 years. Exercise prices range from £nil to the mid-
market value of Velocys plc’s ordinary shares on the day prior to grant. Options are fair valued at grant date using the Black-Scholes model 
(which is not the fair value of goods and services received). For a completed service period, fair value is expensed over the service period 
plus the vesting period, for a future service period, fair value is expensed over the vesting period.

Movements in the number of consultants’ share options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise prices are as follows.

At 1 January 
Granted 
Forfeited 
Exercised 

At 31 December 

Weighted 
average  
exercise price 

87.39p 
– 
– 
– 

87.39p 

2016 

Number of 
options 

253,879 
– 
– 
– 

253,879 

Weighted
average 
exercise price 

51.15p 
108.03p 
– 
– 

87.39p 

2015

Number of
 options

92,129
161,750
–
–

253,879

Of the 253,879 options outstanding at 31 December 2016, 163,879 were exercisable (2015: 103,879). The weighted average exercise price  
of the exercisable shares was 77.58p (2015: 51.88p). 

56    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    57

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

15.  Share-based payments (continued)
Share options outstanding at the end of the year have the following expiry dates and exercise prices.

Year of expiry 

2021 
2022 
2023 
2024 
2025 

Total 

Range of  
exercise price 

1.00p  
1.00p 
1.00 – 53.10p 
145.25p 
105.25 – 143.5p 

1.00 – 145.25p 

Number of 
 options 

6,500 
10,204 
54,050 
21,375 
161,750 

253,879 

2016 

Weighted 
average 
exercise price 

1.00p 
1.00p 
29.44p 
145.25p 
108.03p 

87.39p 

2015

Weighted
average
exercise price

1.00p
1.00p
29.44p
145.25p
108.03p

84.67p

Number of 
options 

6,500 
10,204 
54,050 
21,375 
161,750 

253,879 

No options were granted during 2016. In 2016 an award was made to Jan Verloop, who resigned from the Board of Velocys plc  
in September 2016, in respect of consultancy services thereafter performed in 2016; these options will be granted in 2017. The number  
of options is determined by the average share price in the quarter prior to the service period, and the options will vest immediately.

The weighted average fair value of options granted in 2015 using the Black-Scholes valuation model was 22.51p per option. The significant 
inputs into the model were as follows.

Weighted average share price at grant date 
Weighted average exercise price 
Weighted average expected volatility 
Weighted average annual risk free rate 
Dividend yield 
Weighted average expected life 

2016 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

2015

108.03p
108.03p
43%
0.8%
0%
1.66 years

The share-based payment expense for the year includes a cost of £22,000 (2015: £18,000) relating to options granted to consultants.

Share-based payments charge
The total charge for share-based payments during the year was £793,000 (2015: £2,142,000) of which £357,000 (2015: £1,544,000) relates 
to options granted to directors and the remainder to other employees.

16. Loss per share
The basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss attributable to owners of the parent company by the weighted average number 
of ordinary shares in issue during the year.

Loss attributable to owners of Velocys plc (£’000s) 
Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue 

Basic and diluted loss per share (pence) 

2016 

(12,669) 
143,282,963 

(8.84) 

2015

(20,051)
141,915,307

(14.13)

Diluted loss per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of shares in issue to assume conversion of all potential 
dilutive shares. Share options have not been included in the number of shares used for the purpose of calculating diluted loss per share 
since these would be anti-dilutive for the period presented. At the end of 2016 there were no other potentially dilutive instruments 
(see note 33). Details of share options are given in note 15.

17.  Intangible assets 
Significant accounting policies
Cost or valuation and amortisation
Goodwill
Of the total Goodwill of £8,113,000, £5,445,000 (2015: £4,519,000) originates from the acquisition of Velocys, Inc. in 2008 and £2,668,000 
(2015: £2,214,000) from the acquisition of VPS in 2014. Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value  
of the Company’s share of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. 
Goodwill is not amortised.

In-process technology 
In-process technology consists of purchased intangibles and capitalised development costs and is carried at cost less accumulated 
amortisation and impairment losses.

Purchased intangibles arose from the acquisition of Velocys, Inc. and Velocys Project Solutions, LLC (VPS).

In respect of intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination, the Company recognises these as distinct from goodwill 
provided they are separable or arise from contractual or other legal rights, and their fair value can be measured reliably. 

Intangible assets are initially recognised at fair value, which is regarded as their cost. They are subsequently held at cost less 
accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. Amortisation is charged when assets are brought into use. The Company uses the 
units-of-production method of amortisation with the measured unit being reactors produced. The number of units used in the model 
is approximately 1,400 (2015: 1,400) four-core reactors based on projections of future sales. Amortisation began in 2015 based on the 
manufacture of the first commercial reactors. It is charged to Administrative expenses in the Income statement.

Research costs are recognised as an expense in the Income statement as they are incurred. 

Development costs, where the related expenditure is separately identifiable and measurable, and management are satisfied as to the 
ultimate technical and commercial viability of the project and that the asset will generate future economic benefit based on all relevant 
available information, are recognised as an intangible asset. Costs arising from funded projects are also recognised to the extent that 
they meet the relevant criteria, net of any amounts reimbursed by research partners. Capitalised development costs are carried at cost 
less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. They are amortised, from the point the asset is available for use in the manner 
intended by management, on the units of production basis, over the period of the assets’ expected benefit. Development costs not 
meeting the criteria for capitalisation are expensed as incurred.

Patents, licences and trademarks
Patents and trademarks are recorded at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. Amortisation is charged 
on a straight line basis over a period of 20 years, which is their estimated useful economic life. Residual values and useful lives 
are reviewed annually and adjusted if appropriate. The Company decided to abandon certain non-core patents in 2016 and 2015. 
This resulted in a loss on disposal of patents of £213,000 (2015: £375,000).

Licences are recorded at the present value of minimum licence payments. Amortisation is charged when related revenue starts to be 
earned and will be charged on a straight line basis over the life of the licences. Residual values and useful lives are reviewed annually  
and adjusted if appropriate.

Customer contracts
Customer contracts are carried at cost less impairment losses. The customer contract value that was written off in 2015 related  
to an expected project development fee negotiated in the acquisition of VPS in 2014. Its value was contingent on achieving a final 
investment decision on the Ashtabula project in 2015, which did not happen.

Software
Purchased software is recorded at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. Amortisation is charged on a straight-line 
basis over its estimated useful life of three years. 

Impairment 
Goodwill is tested annually for impairment, and also whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate the carrying value may  
not be recoverable. Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units for the purpose of impairment testing; however, since 2015 just a single 
cash-generating unit, synthetic fuels, has been recognised. This reflected the fact that, although the Company has several technology 
streams, it measures progress and performance using one business segment (see note 5). 

The Company has no indefinite-life intangible assets other than goodwill. For intangible assets that are not yet available for use, 
impairment testing is performed annually. The carrying amounts of the Company’s available-for-use intangible assets (excluding 
goodwill) are reviewed at each balance sheet date or when events or changes in circumstance indicate their carrying value may not be 
recoverable to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If such an indication exists, the asset’s recoverable amount 
is estimated.

58    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    59

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

17.  Intangible assets (continued)
To the extent the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, the difference is recorded as an expense in the Income statement. 
The recoverable amount used is the higher of the value in use and fair value less costs of disposal. For the purpose of impairment testing, 
assets are generally assessed individually or at a CGU level, which represents the lowest level for which there are separately identifiable 
cash inflows that are largely independent of cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets. The determination of CGUs is consistent 
with that detailed for goodwill.

An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. An impairment loss in respect of intangible assets (excluding goodwill) is 
reversed if the subsequent increase in recoverable amount can be related objectively to an event occurring after the loss was recognised, 
or if there has been a change in the estimate used to determine the recoverable amount. A loss is reversed only to the extent that the 
asset’s carrying amount does not exceed that which would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment 
loss had been recognised.

An impairment has not been recorded for 2016. The impairment of a customer contract in 2015 related to the failure of the Ashtabula 
project to achieve final investment decision within a specified timeframe after the acquisition of VPS. The remainder of Intangibles, 
(Patents, licence and trademarks, and Software) are internally generated. 

Critical estimates and judgements
In assessing whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired, an entity shall consider, as a minimum, a number of indicators 
of potential impairment. The Company identified that, at the annual impairment assessment date (being the balance sheet date), the 
carrying amount of the net assets of the Company of £63.9m was greater than its market capitalisation of £53.4m. 

The CGU’s recoverable amount has historically been determined by its value in use, assessed by the estimated future cash flows 
discounted to their present value using an appropriate pre-tax discount rate model. Due to the recent launch of the Company’s new 
strategy, which involves a much more pro-active approach to market development and a focus on a few key markets, an assessment of 
future cash flows based on reaching final investment decision on new GTL or BTL plants involved a particularly high level of judgement. 
Consequently, a fair value less costs of disposal basis was adopted for the 31 December 2016 assessment. 

The value for market capitalisation has been obtained by calculating the total value of the parent company’s equity based on the  
AIM-listed shares of the parent company, adjusted for a control premium. This premium is an amount that a buyer is willing to pay  
over the current market price of a publicly traded company in order to acquire a controlling share in that company. The control premium 
estimate applied is a key assumption. Management have estimated a premium of 25%. A reduction in this assumption to 18% would  
result in a material impairment of goodwill. In concluding on the impairment assessment, management have also considered information 
from after the reporting period. This does not indicate that an impairment at the end of the reporting period was required. A review of  
the market capitalisation after the reporting date was considered to be important in assessing the relative importance of the share 
price at 31 December 2016. The market cap has increased in 2017, particularly in light of several Company announcements with respect 
to achieving first product at the ENVIA GTL plant and the signing of a number of strategic partnership agreements. The current market 
capitalisation of the Company is significantly in excess of the carrying amount of the net assets of the Company. 

2015 

Cost 
At 1 January 2015 
Additions 
Disposals 
Foreign exchange movement 

At 31 December 2015 

Accumulated amortisation 
At 1 January 2015 
Charge for the year 
Disposals 
Impairment 
Foreign exchange movement 

At 31 December 2015 

Net book amount 
At 31 December 2015 

Goodwill 
£’000 

In-process 
technology 
£’000 

Patents,
licence and 
trademarks 
£’000 

Customer
contracts 
£’000 

Software 
£’000 

Total
£’000

5,958 
– 
– 
775 

6,733 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

20,610 
– 
– 
919 

21,529 

1,328 
28 
– 
– 
– 

1,356 

1,995 
393 
(523) 
62 

1,927 

528 
152 
(148) 
– 
15 

547 

1,473 
– 
– 
– 

1,473 

– 
– 
– 
1,473 
– 

1,473 

6,733 

20,173 

1,380 

– 

328 
2 
(208) 
6 

128 

161 
72 
(200) 
– 
3 

36 

92 

30,364
395
(731)
1,762

31,790

2,017
252
(348)
1,473
18

3,412

28,378

18. Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost, net of depreciation and any provision for impairment. Cost includes the original 
purchase price of the asset and the costs attributable to bringing the asset to working condition for its intended use. Depreciation is 
provided on all property, plant and equipment at rates calculated to write off the cost, less estimated residual value, of each asset on 
a straight-line basis over its expected useful life, which for plant and machinery is three to ten years. No depreciation is provided on 
land or assets under construction. 

Residual values and useful lives are reviewed annually. Values are estimated using benchmark prices at the balance sheet date; useful 
lives are estimated based on management expectations of future project requirements and operational assessment of the state of 
assets.

Assets are reviewed for impairment annually and also whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying value may not 
be recoverable. To the extent the carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount, the difference is recorded as an expense in the Income 
statement. The recoverable amount used for impairment testing is the higher of the value in use and fair value less costs of disposal. 
For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are generally tested individually or at a CGU level which represents the lowest level for 
which there are separately identifiable cash inflows which are largely independent of cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets.

Based on this assessment the recoverable amount was in excess of the carrying amount of intangible assets, and therefore an 
impairment was not recorded (2015: £nil).

Expenditure funded by research partners is only capitalised where there are no significant rights acquired by the third party over the 
asset and the asset has a clear enduring use beyond the specific funding project, these are regularly reviewed.

2016 

Cost 
At 1 January 2016 
Additions 
Disposals 
Foreign exchange movement 

At 31 December 2016 

Accumulated amortisation 
At 1 January 2016 
Charge for the year 
Disposals 
Impairment 
Foreign exchange movement 

At 31 December 2016 

Net book amount 
At 31 December 2016 

Goodwill 
£’000 

In-process 
technology 
£’000 

Patents,
licence and 
trademarks 
£’000 

Customer
contracts 
£’000 

Software 
£’000 

6,733 
– 
– 
1,380 

8,113 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

21,529 
– 
– 
4,413 

25,942 

1,356 
– 
– 
– 
272 

1,628 

1,927 
356 
(301) 
266 

2,248 

547 
145 
(88) 
– 
74 

678 

1,473 
– 
– 
– 

1,473 

1,473 
– 
– 
– 
– 

1,473 

128 
1 
(40) 
12 

101 

36 
46 
(20) 
– 
1 

63 

Total
£’000

31,790
357
(341)
6,071

37,877

3,412
191
(108)
–
347

3,842

8,113 

24,314 

1,570 

– 

38 

34,035

2016 

Cost  
At 1 January 2016 
Additions 
Disposals 
Transfers to plant and machinery 
Foreign exchange 

At 31 December 2016 

Accumulated depreciation 
At 1 January 2016 
Charge for the year 
Disposals 
Foreign exchange 

At 31 December 2016 

Net book amount 
At 31 December 2016 

Assets under  
construction 
£’000 

63 
246 
– 
(222) 
17 

104 

– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

Land 
£’000 

1,104 
– 
– 
– 
226 

1,330 

– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

Plant and
machinery 
£’000 

10,118 
45 
(95) 
222 
1,910 

12,200 

5,778 
1,132 
(94) 
1,181 

7,997 

104 

1,330 

4,203 

Total
£’000

11,285
291
(95)
–
2,153

13,634

5,778
1,132
(94)
1,181

7,997

5,637

60    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    61

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

18. Property, plant and equipment (continued)

2015 

Cost  
At 1 January 2015 
Additions 
Disposals 
Transfers to plant and machinery 
Foreign exchange 

At 31 December 2015 

Accumulated depreciation 
At 1 January 2015 
Charge for the year 
Disposals 
Foreign exchange 

At 31 December 2015 

Net book amount 
At 31 December 2015 

Assets under  
construction 
£’000 

778 
224 
– 
(954) 
15 

63 

– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

63 

Land 
£’000 

1,053 
– 
– 
– 
51 

1,104 

– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

Plant and
machinery 
£’000 

7,827 
2,038 
(1,082) 
954 
381 

10,118 

5,593 
1,025 
(1,077) 
237 

5,778 

1,104 

4,340 

Total
£’000

9,658
2,262
(1,082)
–
447

11,285

5,593
1,025
(1,077)
237

5,778

5,507

As at 31 December 2016, the Company had entered into contractual commitments for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment 
amounting to £12,000 (2015: £23,000).

19.  Investments in subsidiaries
On acquisition, subsidiaries are accounted for in the consolidated accounts using the purchase method. The cost is measured as the  
fair value of the assets acquired, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange, irrespective of 
minority interest. For acquisitions completed prior to 1 January 2010, costs directly attributable to the acquisition are included in this 
calculation, for subsequent acquisitions they are expensed. The excess of cost over fair value is recorded as goodwill. If cost is less than  
fair value, the difference is recognised in the Income statement. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is 
transferred to the Company.

Investments in subsidiaries are held by the parent company at historical cost less impairment. The net investment that the parent  
company has in its subsidiary undertakings is its interest in the net assets of that subsidiary. The inclusion of long-term loans and 
receivables (Loans to subsidiaries) as part of the net investment in the subsidiary undertaking (Investment in subsidiaries) is determined 
by the fact that settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future. All loans to subsidiaries by the parent company 
meet this criterion. 

The carrying amounts of the parent company’s Investments in subsidiaries are reviewed at each balance sheet date, or when events or 
changes in circumstance indicate their carrying value may not be recoverable, to determine whether there is any indication of impairment.  
If such an indication exists, the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated. To the extent the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable 
amount, the difference is recorded as an expense in the Income statement. The recoverable amount used for impairment testing is the 
higher of the value in use and fair value less costs of disposal. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are generally assessed 
individually or at a CGU level, which represents the lowest level for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows that are largely 
independent of cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets. 

As set out in note 17, an impairment assessment was carried out on the Company’s intangible assets and no impairment was indicated.  
The parent company used the same basis for calculating the recoverable amount to determine the total value of the three subsidiaries  
held by the parent company, based on the judgement that there is limited value attributable to the parent company, as a non-trading 
holding company. The parent company has both equity and debt investments in the three subsidiaries, which are compared to the 
recoverable amount. On this basis, the impairment assessment indicated that the carrying value of the investments in subsidiaries was 
higher than the recoverable amount, determined by fair value less costs of disposal. As a result, an impairment of £65,716,000 (2015: £nil) 
was recognised. This impairment eliminated on consolidation.

An impairment loss in respect of Investments in subsidiaries is reversed if the subsequent increase in recoverable amount can be related 
objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised or if there has been a change in the estimate used to determine 
the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed that which 
would have been determined if no impairment loss had been recognised.

Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains and losses on transactions are eliminated in the consolidated accounts. 
Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with Company policies.

Critical estimates and judgements
In assessing whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired, an entity shall consider, as a minimum, a number of indicators 
of potential impairment. The parent company identified that at the annual impairment assessment date, being the balance sheet date, 
the carrying amount of the net assets of the parent company of £67.4m was more than its market capitalisation of £53.5m. The critical 
estimates and judgements applied in calculating the recoverable amount are set out in note 17.

Loan to 
subsidiaries 
£’000 

Capital 
contributions to 
subsidiaries 
£’000 

89,369 
(2,792) 
– 
(46,973) 
8,166 

47,770 

36,920 
– 
884 
(18,743) 
– 

19,061 

2016 

Total 
investment in 
subsidiaries 
£’000 

126,289 
(2,792) 
884 
(65,716) 
8,166 

66,831 

Loan to 
subsidiaries 
£’000 

Capital 
contributions to 
subsidiaries 
£’000 

93,820 
(3,655) 
– 
– 
(796) 

89,369 

34,932 
– 
1,988 
– 
– 

36,920 

Velocys plc 

Investments in subsidiaries
At 1 January 
Movement in loans 
Capital contributions 
Impairment of subsidiaries 
Foreign exchange 

At 31 December 

The parent company has direct investments in the following subsidiary undertakings.

Subsidiary undertakings 

Velocys Technologies Limited* 

Country of 
incorporation or principal 
business address 

England and Wales 

Principal activity 

Design and development  
of catalysts, and exploitation of  
platform catalyst technologies 

Velocys (USA Holdings) LLC**  

Ohio, USA 

Holding company for US subsidiaries 

Oxford Catalysts Trustees Limited* 

England and Wales 

Holds assets and makes distributions  
in respect of employee remuneration 

The following companies are subsidiaries of the Company whose immediate parent is not Velocys plc.

Subsidiary undertakings 

Velocys, Inc.** 

Velocys Project Solutions, LLC*** 

Ashtabula Energy, LLC*** 

Country of 
incorporation or principal 
business address 

Delaware, USA 

Delaware, USA 

Delaware, USA 

Principal activity 

Design, development and exploitation  
of its microchannel technologies 

Project development of  
smaller scale GTL plants 

Project development of smaller scale  
GTL plant in Ashtabula, Ohio 

YellowRock GTL Services, LLC** 

Delaware, USA 

Secondment of employees to plants 

VMH Assets LLC** 

JAB Land-Ashtabula** 

Ohio, USA 

Ohio USA 

Holds manufacturing assets in Ohio 

Holds land for smaller scale GTL plant  
in Ashtabula Ohio 

Westlake GTL, LLC** 

Delaware, USA 

Project development of smaller 
 scale GTL plant 

2015

Total
investment in
subsidiaries
£’000

128,752
(3,655)
1,988
–
(796)

126,289

% Holding
(all ordinary
 share capital)

100

100

100

% Holding
(all ordinary
 share capital)

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

The following are dormant subsidiaries.

Dormant subsidiaries 

Oxford Catalysts UK Limited* 

Bradford GTL LLC*** 

Susquehanna GTL LLC*** 

Incorporated 

England and Wales 

Delaware, USA 

Delaware, USA 

Immediate parent 

% Holding

Velocys plc 

Velocys Project Solutions, LLC 

Velocys Project Solutions, LLC 

100

100

100

Located at 115e Olympic Avenue, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4SA, UK.

* 
**  Located at 7950 Corporate Boulevard, Plain City, OH 43064, USA.
***  Located at 2603 Augusta Drive, Suite 1175, Houston, TX 77057, USA.

62    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    63

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

20. Investments
Investments consist solely of Velocys’ holding in ENVIA Energy, LLC (ENVIA) located at 1021 Main Street, Suite 1000 Houston, TX 77002. 
ENVIA is a US company and is the holding company for the project located in Oklahoma (the ENVIA project). The Company first invested  
in ENVIA in 2014 as entry into a joint venture to develop GTL plants in the US using a combination of renewable biogas (including landfill 
gas) and natural gas. The first of these plants, ENVIA Oklahoma City produced its first product in 2017. A description of the ENVIA project  
is available in the Strategic report on pages 8-11. 

Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other 
categories of financial instruments – see note 28 for a description of these classes and the accounting policy for available-for-sale  
financial assets. At 31 December 2015, the investment was recorded at cost, which was also considered to be fair value.

At the end of January 2016, Velocys entered into a financing arrangement with ENVIA under which it contributed additional equity finance  
of $2,587,000 and committed to provide loan finance of up to $9,310,000. This senior loan note bears interest at 10%, and is repayable on  
31 December 2019 with an option to extend to 31 December 2020. As at 31 December 2016, one draw down on this facility had been 
made by ENVIA in the amount of $400,000 (see note 21). As a result of the new funding arrangement, Velocys increased its ownership 
share and was awarded additional voting rights, taking its share of voting rights to 28%. 

Associates are all entities over which the Company has significant influence but not control, generally accompanying a shareholding of 
between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. From this point the investment has been recognised as an Investment in associate, accounted 
for under the equity method. This judgement was based on the level of influence Velocys holds in ENVIA, including voting rights exceeding 
20% and a seat on ENVIA’s board. Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting from the date on 
which it becomes an associate. Under the equity method, a cost approach is followed whereby the cost of all purchases are accumulated 
(including transaction costs) to determine the amount of the investment. The notional purchase price allocation (including goodwill 
arising on the purchase of the additional stake) is calculated using fair value information at the date when the additional interest 
is acquired. Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the cost of the investment over the Company’s share of the net fair value of the 
investee’s identifiable assets and liabilities and included in the carrying amount of the investment. The allocation was fair valued, which 
gave rise to goodwill of £320,000; this has been included in Investment in the Investment in associate table below. Velocys’ share of losses 
since the end of January 2016, arising from administration costs incurred by ENVIA ahead of the start-up of its first GTL plant, has been 
reflected in the Income statement. The carrying amount of the investment is adjusted to recognise the investor’s share of the change in 
net assets of the investee after the date of acquisition.

The Company’s share of post-acquisition profit or loss is recognised in the Income statement. There are no post-acquisition movements 
in Other comprehensive income in the Company’s investments in associates. Distributions received from an associate reduce the carrying 
amount of the investment.

The Company determines at each reporting date whether there is any objective evidence that the investment in the associate is impaired.  
If this is the case, the Company calculates the amount of impairment as the difference between the recoverable amount of the associate 
and its carrying value and recognises the amount adjacent to share of profit/(loss) of associates in the income statement. See note 17  
for impairment of non-financial assets. 

Gains and losses resulting from upstream and downstream transactions between the Company and its associate are recognised in the 
financial statements only to the extent of unrelated investors’ interests in the associates. Unrealised losses are eliminated unless the 
transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of associates have been changed where 
necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Company. There have been no dilution gains and losses arising in 
investments in associates.

Critical estimates and judgements
On acquisition of significant influence, the Company has recognised 9.7% of the net fair value of ENVIA’s identifiable assets and 
liabilities in its investment in ENVIA and, for the period from such acquisition to 31 December 2016, recognised 9.8% as its share of 
post-acquisition losses in ENVIA. These percentages differ to both the Company’s proportion of ownership units held in ENVIA and its 
proportion of voting units, which are outlined above. They are considered more appropriate measures of the Company’s economic interest 
in ENVIA at both acquisition and for the period ending 31 December 2016, where the distribution of both ENVIA’s identifiable assets and 
liabilities and its net losses is defined by the LLC agreement agreed with each of the other parties that hold ownership units in ENVIA. 
The investment is denominated in US dollars; in 2015 it was considered to be an available-for-sale asset.

Company 

Available-for-sale investment  
At 1 January 
Investment 
Foreign exchange 
Movement to associate 

At 31 December 

Company 

Investment in associate  
At 1 January 
Movement from available-for-sale 
Investment 
Share of loss 
Foreign exchange 

At 31 December 

2016 
£’000 

3,375 
– 
– 
(3,375) 

– 

2016 
£’000 

– 
3,375 
1,938 
(306) 
858 

5,865 

2015
£’000

1,711
1,535
129
–

3,375

2015
£’000

–
–
–
–
–

–

Summarised financial information for ENVIA
Set out below is the unaudited summarised financial information for ENVIA. The information below reflects the amounts presented in 
the financial statements of ENVIA adjusted for differences in accounting policies between the Company and ENVIA. ENVIA financial 
statements are not prepared under IFRS but management does not consider US GAAP to be materially different from IFRS for this 
purpose.

ENVIA Energy, LLC 

Summarised balance sheet 
Current assets 
Non-current assets 
Current liabilities 
Non-current liabilities 

Summarised statement of comprehensive income 
Revenue 
Loss from continuing operations 
Other comprehensive income 

Total comprehensive income 

The Company’s interest in associate was calculated as follows.

Fair value as at recognition of investment as associate 
Investment (9.7%) 
Loss for the period 
Investment (9.8%) 
Goodwill 
Foreign exchange 

Carrying value 

2016
(unaudited)
£’000

5,066
63,303
(5,716)
(381)

–
(3,155)
–

(3,155)

2016
£’000

51,643
4,993
(3,155)
(306)
320
858

5,865

64    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    65

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

21.  Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables
Trade receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, 
less provision for impairment. A provision is established when there is objective evidence that the Company will not be able to collect 
all amounts due according to the original terms. Significant financial difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter 
bankruptcy or financial reorganisation, and default or delinquency in payments (more than 30 days overdue) are considered indicators 
that the trade receivable is impaired. 

The amount of the provision is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, 
discounted at the original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through an allowance account, and the 
amount of the loss is recognised in Cost of sales in the Income statement. When a receivable is uncollectible, it is written off against the 
allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against Cost of sales.

Company 

Non-current 
Loan receivable 

Total 

2016 
£’000 

325 

325 

2015
£’000

–

–

Velocys has committed to provide up to US$9,310,000 to ENVIA through a senior loan note due on 31 December 2019 and bearing a 10% 
interest rate, with an optional extension to 31 December 2020 with prior notice. As at 31 December 2016, one draw down on this facility 
had been made by ENVIA in the amount of £325,000 ($400,000). See note 20.

Company 

Current 
Trade receivables 
Prepayments and accrued income 
Other receivables 

Total 

Parent company 

Current 
Prepayments and accrued income 
Other receivables 

Total 

2016 
£’000 

397 
371 
43 

811 

2016 
£’000 

31 
– 

31 

2015
£’000

4
324
583

911

2015
£’000

15
17

32

The fair value of trade and other receivables is not materially different to the book value above (2015: not materially different). The trade 
receivables hold a low credit risk. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of each class of 
receivable plus cash balances held. The Company does not hold any collateral as security (2015: £nil).

As at 31 December 2016 Company trade receivables of £249,000 (2015: £4,000) were past due but not impaired. The aging analysis for the 
2016 amounts past the due date, which were received in full in 2017, is as follows.

Company 

Up to three months 

Total 

2016 
£’000 

249 

249 

2015
£’000

4

4

The Company’s trade receivables outstanding at year end represent approximately 102 days’ sales (2015: 1 day). These are existing 
customers with no history of default. The parent company had no trade receivables at 31 December 2016 (2015: £nil).

The Company believes that the full amount of trade receivables recognised is recoverable. At 31 December 2016, the parent company had 
no overdue trade receivables (2015: £nil). The other classes within trade and other receivables do not contain impaired assets (2015: £nil).

Trade and other receivables are denominated in the following currencies:

Company 

UK sterling 
US dollars 

Total 

2016 
£’000 

224 
587 

811 

2015
£’000

233
678

911

22. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realisable value less provision for impairment. Cost is determined on a first-in, first-out 
basis and includes transport and handling costs. In the case of manufactured products, cost includes all direct expenditure including 
production overheads. Where necessary, provision is made for obsolete, slow-moving and defective inventories. Items purchased for use 
in externally funded research and development projects are expensed to that contract immediately. Items held for the Company’s own 
development are also expensed when acquired. Items purchased for ongoing commercial sale are held in inventory and expensed when 
used or sold. 

Company 

Raw materials and consumables 
Finished goods 

Total 

2016 
£’000 

95 
1,366 

1,461 

2015
£’000

77
1,316

1,393

In 2016, the Company wrote off £104,000 of the value of an inventoried reactor as a reflection of the fact that its selling price is below cost. 
The book value of the inventoried reactor is £311,000.

23. Short term investments, cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks and other short-term highly liquid investments with 
original maturities of three months or less. Bank accounts held which have an original maturity of more than three months, or which are 
subject to significant restrictions over access are shown as short term investments or other financial assets with appropriate disclosure 
of the related terms. See note 28.

Company 

Short term bank deposits 
Cash at bank and in hand 

Total cash and cash equivalents 

2016 
£’000 

– 
18,744 

18,744 

Both short term investments, and cash and cash equivalents, are denominated in UK sterling and in US dollars, as follows:

UK sterling denominated

Company 

Short term bank deposits 
Cash at bank and in hand 

Total UK sterling denominated 

US dollar denominated

Company 

Short term bank deposits 
Cash at bank and in hand 

Total US dollar denominated 

The parent company has no cash or cash equivalents (2015: £nil).

2016 
£’000 

– 
7,114 

7,114 

2016 
£’000 

– 
11,630 

11,630 

2015
£’000

3,000
34,736

37,736

2015
£’000

3,000
23,570

26,570

2015
£’000

–
11,166

11,166

66    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    67

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

24. Trade and other payables: current
Provisions for claims are recognised when the Company has a present constructive or legal obligation as a result of past events, and it is 
probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and the amount can be reliably estimated. See note 28.

Company 

Trade payables 
Other taxation and social security 
Accruals 
Deferred income 
Deferred consideration 

Total 

2016 
£’000 

722 
51 
991 
508 
– 

2,272 

2015
£’000

1,372
14
3,265
2,638
91

7,380

The parent company has trade and other payables of £72,000 (2015: £140,000), all of which are accruals.

Due to their short maturity, the fair value of trade and other payables are not considered to be materially different to their carrying values, 
based on discounted cash flows.

All trade payables are due in 60 days or less (2015: 60 days or less). 

Deferred consideration relates to the acquisition of VPS in 2014, under which a number of ‘holdback’ shares were designated to cover 
post-acquisition adjustments; these shares were issued during 2016.

25. Trade and other payables: non-current

Company 

Accruals 
Deferred income 

Total 

2016 
£’000 

110 
1,233 

1,343 

2015
£’000

65
1,262

1,327

The fair values of trade and other payables are not considered to be materially different to their carrying values.

Deferred income for 2016 includes funds received for catalyst to be earned over a two-year period commencing at the start-up of the  
ENVIA reactors. 

26. Borrowings
Maturity of borrowings for the Company is as follows.

Company 

Within one year 
Within two to five years 

Total 

2016 
£’000 

323 
593 

916 

2015
£’000

288
759

1,047

The majority of Borrowings relates to a loan entered into on 1 December 2009 by Velocys plc’s wholly owned subsidiary, Velocys, Inc. with 
the State of Ohio (the State) allowing Velocys, Inc. to borrow up to $2.25m to fund qualified capital projects for research and development 
projects. All such projects were required to be completed by 31 August 2012 and have 25% of costs funded by Velocys Inc. The interest rate 
for the loan is 2.00% per annum with a service fee of 0.25% on the principal balance. The Company’s fixed rate borrowings are carried at 
amortised cost. They are therefore not subject to interest rate risk as defined in IFRS 7, since neither the carrying amount nor the future 
cash flows will fluctuate because of a change in market interest rates. The loan is repaid to the State using a blended payment schedule 
as follows.
˜˜ For the first five years of the loan, the principal is paid in consecutive monthly instalments based upon an original amortisation over  

20 years with any interest accrued during that particular month.

˜˜ For the remaining term of the loan, the principal is paid in consecutive monthly instalments based upon the remaining term of the loan  

(five years) with any interest accrued during that particular month.

The loan is secured by all plant and machinery acquired using the loan proceeds as well as a guarantee of payment provided by the parent 
company. The gross book value of the capital projects secured is £2,672,000 (2015: £2,217,000). The loan was fully drawn down in 2012. 
After repayments of principal, the amount outstanding on the loan as at 31 December 2016 is £880,000 (2015: £964,000). 

All remaining Borrowings of £36,000 (2015: £83,000) arise from finance lease obligations. The fair values of Borrowings are not considered 
to be materially different to their carrying values based on discounted cash flows.

27.  Derivative financial instruments
The Company is funded in sterling but buys US dollars to fund its operations in the United States, which exposes it to foreign exchange 
risk. This is mitigated through the use of forward contracts at fixed rates of exchange with fixed maturity dates. Derivative financial 
instruments are initially recognised at fair value on the date the derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at 
fair value at each balance sheet date using values determined indirectly from quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability. 
This is a level 2 fair value measurement. Gains and losses against the US dollar exchange rate as at 31 December 2016 are recognised 
in Finance income in the Income statement. At 31 December 2016 the notional principal amounts of the outstanding forward foreign 
exchange contracts were £2,714,000 (2015: £3,217,000), and the revalued amounts were £3,251,000 (2015: £3,373,000). The unrealised 
foreign exchange gain on these contracts as at 31 December 2016 was £537,000 (2015: £156,000). All the outstanding contracts will 
mature during 2017. 

28. Financial instruments
Financial assets
The Company classifies its financial assets in the following categories: at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables 
and available-for sale. The classification depends on the nature of the asset and the purpose for which the assets were acquired. 
Financial assets are classified upon initial recognition. 

Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. 

The Company’s principal financial asset is Cash and cash equivalents. In 2015 it also held short-term investments, which are cash 
deposits on fixed terms of interest for more than three months (see note 23). 

Loans and receivables also includes Trade receivables and Other receivables (see note 21), which are classified as current assets, and 
the loan to ENVIA (see notes 19 and 20), which is classified as non-current as its maturity is more than 12 months from the balance 
sheet date. Loans and receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective 
interest method, less provision for impairment.

Assets at fair value through profit and loss
Financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognised at fair value, and transaction costs are expensed  
in the Consolidated income statement. 

For Velocys, this category includes only derivative financial instruments (see note 27). The Company enters into forward contracts  
to mitigate the risk of needing to fund its US operations in dollars. An asset is recognised when there is a foreign exchange gain upon  
re-measurement of the contract. The Company hasn’t taken a forward position further than 12 months from the reporting date. 
Therefore all assets have been recognised as current. The gain or loss on re-measurement to fair value is recognised immediately 
in the Income statement, in Net finance income.

Available for sale
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other 
categories. They are included in non-current assets unless the investment matures or management intends to dispose of the assets 
within 12 months after the balance sheet date. Available for sale financial assets are subsequently carried at fair value; movements 
are recorded in the Statement of comprehensive income.

In 2015 the Company’s investment in ENVIA was recognised as an Available for sale financial asset. At the end of January 2016 
the investment and voting interest were increased and was subsequently recognised as an Investment in associate (see note 20). 
Investments are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial assets not carried at fair value through profit 
or loss.

Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. In 2015 and 2016 the 
Company had only one category of liability.

Financial liabilities at amortised cost
Financial liabilities at amortised cost includes Trade payables, all of which are current liabilities (see note 25), Borrowings and Finance 
leases (see note 26). Trade payables are stated at fair value and subsequently held at amortised cost using the effective interest 
method. Under Borrowings, interest bearing loans and overdrafts are initially recorded at the fair value of proceeds received net of direct 
issue costs, and thereafter at amortised cost. Finance charges, including premiums payable on settlement or redemption and direct 
issue costs, are recognised in the income statement using the effective interest method and are added to the carrying amount of the 
instrument to the extent that they are not settled in the period in which they arise.

All of the above financial assets and liabilities are level 2 fair value measurements.

68    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    69

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

28. Financial instruments (continued)
Financial risks
The activities of Velocys expose it to a number of financial risks, which are dealt with specifically below.

Interest rates
Variations in interest rates affect only Velocys’ cash holdings, as its borrowing is payable at a fixed rate. As far as the cash flow forecast 
allows for certainty, funds are placed on fixed rate deposits. The effect of interest rates on exchange rates is not anticipated.

Financing
The Company’s cash usage is significant versus prospective future cashflows (particularly in the short term) and Velocys is reliant on 
the support of a small group of major shareholders. The timing of cashflows is difficult to predict given the Company’s nascent strategy. 
The Board recognises that further funding will be needed. Note 2 discusses uncertainties surrounding the extent and composition of 
future funding. The Company believes that equity remains the preferred structure to support the business as a going concern in the near 
term, but will keep this under review. The recently announced fundraise included the issue of loan notes that are convertible into equity. 
As such, in management’s view, they have the key characteristics of equity. Velocys continues to take measures to preserve cash in order 
to protect against unforeseen events.

Equity forms the basis of the Company’s capital. Its objectives when managing this capital are: 
˜˜

To secure its ability to continue as a going concern. 
To keep its cost of capital low through an optimised capital structure.
To preserve sufficient funds to protect it against unforeseen events and risks.
To be in a position to take advantage of opportunities that can deliver a return to shareholders.

˜˜

˜˜

˜˜

The Company’s revenue stream relies on projects incorporating its technology securing project finance. The Company’s strategy is to take  
a pro-active role in this process. It is actively engaging with banks and financial advisors with high levels of expertise in project financing  
to support the financing plans for the types of projects it is developing. 

Exchange rates
A significant proportion of commercial activity and R&D costs are US-dollar denominated. Where possible, revenue is receipted in  
US dollars to act as a natural hedge against this exposure. Additionally, a proportion of liquid assets is held in US dollars, and future 
exchange rate uncertainty is managed through the use of forward contracts at fixed rates of exchange. 

The use of financial derivatives is governed by Company policies, which are approved by the Board of directors, and which provide a set  
of written principles for the management of these risks. At present Velocys makes use of financial derivatives only in the management  
of the foreign exchange exposure arising from funding its US operations.

The consolidated financial statements contain significant US-dollar denominated intangible assets relating to the acquisition of Velocys, 
Inc., which give rise to movements in reserves when exchange rates fluctuate. These movements are not hedged as they do not impact the 
cash position.

Financial assets are as follows.

Company 

Assets as per balance sheet 
Derivative financial instruments 
Trade and other receivables excluding non-financial assets 
Short term investments – funds held on deposit 
Cash and cash equivalents 

Total 

Company 

Assets as per balance sheet 
Available-for-sale financial assets 
Derivative financial instruments 
Trade and other receivables excluding non-financial assets 
Short term investments – funds held on deposit 
Cash and cash equivalents 

Total 

The credit risk of short term investments and cash and cash equivalents is summarised in the following table.

The table below illustrates the Company’s sensitivity to changes in the US dollar exchange rate at the balance sheet date. The analysis 
covers only financial assets and liabilities.

Short-term bank deposits, cash at bank and in hand 

GBP:USD exchange rate +/- 10% 

Income  
statement 
£’000 

1,421 

2016 

Equity 
£’000 

1,421 

Income
statement 
£’000  

1,157 

2015

Equity
£’000

1,157

Aa2  
Aa3  
A1 
A2   
A3   

Total 

2016 

% 

3 
47 
47 
– 
3 

£’000 

663 
8,817 
8,747 
– 
517 

18,744 

Liquidity
The Company maintains sufficient cash balances to meet anticipated requirements. Cash flow forecasts are regularly reviewed, 
cash balances are held immediately available as necessary, and surplus funds are placed on time deposits of varying duration. 

Credit
The Company’s credit risk is primarily attributable to its trade receivables, which are concentrated in a small number of high value 
customer accounts. This risk is managed by carrying out relevant financial checks on customers, and where necessary, requiring letters 
of credit or advance payments.

The credit risk of liquid funds is limited through a Company treasury policy, maintained to ensure that liquid assets are only placed with 
highly-rated institutions, and that the spread of such assets restricts exposure to any one counterparty. Risk is assessed using an external 
credit rating agency’s long-term ratings.

  31 December 2016

Loans and  
receivables 
£’000 

Assets at fair
value through 
profit and loss 
£’000 

Available
for sale 
£’000 

– 
765 
– 
18,744 

19,509 

537 
– 
– 
– 

537 

– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

Total
£’000

537
765
–
18,744

20,046

  31 December 2015

Loans and  
receivables 
£’000 

Assets at fair
value through 
profit and loss 
£’000 

– 
– 
587 
3,000 
34,736 

38,323 

– 
156 
– 
– 
– 

156 

Available
for sale 
£’000 

3,375 
– 
– 
– 
– 

3,375 

£’000  

3,447 
5,698 
15,044 
12,034 
1,513 

37,736 

Total
£’000

3,375
156
587
3,000
34,736

41,854

2015

%

9
15
40
32
4

70    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    71

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

28. Financial instruments (continued)
Financial liabilities are as follows.

Company 

Liabilities as per balance sheet 
Borrowings 
Trade and other payables excluding non-financial liabilities 
Finance lease liabilities 

Total 

Company 

Liabilities as per balance sheet
Borrowings 
Trade and other payables excluding non-financial liabilities 
Finance lease liabilities 

Total 

The aging of financial liabilities is as follows.

Company 

Within one year 
Within two to five years 

Total 

Financial assets of the parent company are as follows. The parent company has no financial liabilities.

Parent company 

Assets as per balance sheet
Trade and other receivables excluding non-financial assets 

Parent company 

Assets as per balance sheet 
Trade and other receivables excluding non-financial assets 

Parent company loans and receivables are all intercompany loans.

31 December 2016

Financial liabilities 
at amortised cost
£’000

880
722
36

1,638

31 December 2015

Financial liabilities 
at amortised cost
£’000

964
1,372
83

2,419

2015
£’000

1,660
759

2,419

31 December 2016

Loans and receivables
£’000

47,770

31 December 2015

Loans and receivables
£’000

89,369

2016 
£’000 

1,045 
593 

1,638 

29. Called up share capital and reserves
Called up share capital

Company and parent company 

At 1 January 2015 
Employee share options scheme: Shares issued 

including 1p exercise price options 

At 31 December 2015 
Employee share options scheme: Shares issued  

including 1p exercise price options 

Holdback shares  

At 31 December 2016 

* 

All shares have been issued, authorised and fully paid.  

Number of  
shares*  
(thousands) 

141,896 

27 

141,923 

1,912 
41 

143,876 

Ordinary 
shares 
£’000 

1,419 

– 

1,419 

19 
– 

1,438 

Share
premium
£’000

149,225

(28)

149,197

(13)
91

149,275

A total of 11,811,991 (2015: 15,613,701) options to subscribe for ordinary shares of Velocys plc have been granted and are outstanding  
at 31 December 2016 under the employee options schemes operated within the Company and contracts for options granted to a limited 
number of consultants. Details are given in note 15.

On 25 June 2014 the Company acquired Velocys Project Solutions, LLC. A number of holdback shares was designated to cover 
adjustments in the period after acquisition. The remaining balance of 41,644 shares was issued during 2016. 

Reserves
Foreign exchange reserve relates to the exchange differences arising from the retranslation of the results and opening net assets of 
foreign subsidiaries. Changes in the reserve are included in other comprehensive income. The Company’s foreign exchange reserve 
was a credit balance of £7,051,000 (2015: a debit balance of £282,000). 

The share based payment reserve records the IFRS 2 charge for equity settled share based payment awards. At 31 December 2016 the 
Company’s and parent company’s share-based payment reserves were both £15,843,000 (2015: £15,362,000). 

30. Commitments
Leases in which a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating 
leases. Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) are charged to the income statement 
on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.

The Company leases certain property, plant and equipment. Leases under which the Company incurs substantially all the risks and 
rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalised on commencement of the lease at the lower of 
the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease payments.

Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance charges so as to achieve a constant rate on the finance balance 
outstanding. The corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges, are included in other long-term payables. The interest element 
of the finance cost is also charged to the income statement in Finance costs over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic 
rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. The property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases 
is depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the asset and the lease term.

Operating lease commitments
The Company leases various offices under non-cancellable operating lease agreements. The lease terms are between two and five years 
and the majority of lease agreements are renewable at the end of the lease period at market rate.

Company 

Future aggregate minimum lease payments under non-cancellable property leases: 
– Within one year 
– Between one and five years 
– After more than five years 

Total 

2016 
£’000 

489 
1,312 
194 

1,995 

2015
£’000

408
1,217
415

2,040

72    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016    73

Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the financial statements (continued)

Company 

Future commitments under non-cancellable operating plant and equipment leases: 
– Within one year 
– Between one and five years 

Total 

Capital commitments are disclosed in note 18.

2016 
£’000 

2 
7 

9 

2015
£’000

2
3

5

The Company is committed to make available additional loan funding to ENVIA of £7.2m ($9.3m), which is repayable by 31 December 2020.

The parent company does not have any commitments (2015: £nil).

31.  Pension arrangements
The Company operates a number of defined contribution schemes for which the pension cost charge for the year amounted to £314,000 
(2015: £326,000).

32. Related party transactions
The parent company has the following amounts due from its subsidiaries:

Balances with subsidiary companies 

Velocys Technologies Limited 
Velocys (USA Holdings) LLC  
Velocys, Inc. 

Total due from subsidiaries 

2016 
£’000 

21,170 
5,205 
21,395 

47,770 

2015
£’000

58,637
6,191
24,541

89,369

All amounts are unsecured and have no fixed date of repayment. All intercompany loans are charged at 5%.

For 2016 the Company provided engineering services totalling £619,000 to ENVIA, an associate in which the Company has ownership and 
voting rights as detailed in note 20. At 31 December 2016 the Company had a receivable due from ENVIA of £145,000. During 2016 Velocys 
committed to provide up to $9,310,000 to ENVIA through a senior loan note, which bears interest of 10%, and is due for repayment on 31 
December 2019 with an optional extension to 31 December 2020. As at 31 December 2016, one draw down on this facility had been made 
by ENVIA in the amount of £325,000 ($400,000 - see note 20). In 2015 ENVIA was not a related party. 

The Company provided engineering services of £110,000 to Norma Investments Limited, which is the parent company of Ervington 
Investments, the largest shareholder in Velocys plc with a holding of 29.5% at 31 December 2016.

Oxford Catalysts Trustees Limited
At the time of exercising their share options, executives of the Company may apply to the employee benefit trust managed by Oxford 
Catalysts Trustees Limited for a distribution in respect of the exercise value of their options. The trustees then request a contribution 
from the Company in respect of the grant made. The total value of funds contributed by the Company to Oxford Catalysts Trustees Limited 
during the year was £13,300 (2015: £nil). 

33. Post-financial position events
The following events occurred after 31 December 2016.

On 17 January 2017 the Company announced that it had signed a memorandum of understanding with Morimatsu, the Company’s 
preferred supplier of module fabrication and engineering. Velocys proceeded, on 3 March, to confirm that it had reached a definitive 
agreement with Morimatsu.

On 26 January 2017 a strategic alliance was announced with TRI, the Company’s preferred supplier of gasification systems for its 
biomass-to-liquids (BTL) plants.

On 6 February 2017 it was announced that first product had been made at ENVIA Energy’s GTL plant in Oklahoma City.

Velocys announced on 26 April 2017 that Mark Chatterji had stepped down from his position as Non-Executive Director.

The Company announced on 15 May 2017 that it had secured £10m of additional funding.

In May 2017 Velocys agreed to provide further loan finance to ENVIA of $3.4 million; this did not affect the Company’s share of ownership 
or voting rights.

74    Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016

Design & production
www.carrkamasa.co.uk

Directors, secretary and advisors to the Company

Registered office
115e Olympic Avenue
Milton Park
Abingdon
Oxfordshire
OX14 4SA

Velocys plc registration no. 
05712187

Directors
Pierre Jungels (Non-Executive Chairman)
David Pummell (Chief Executive Officer)
Susan Robertson (Chief Financial Officer)
Paul Schubert (Chief Operating Officer)
Julian West (Senior Independent Director)
Ross Allonby (Non-Executive Director)
Sandy Shaw (Non-Executive Director)

Company secretary 
Jeremy Gorman

Nominated advisors and joint brokers 
Numis Securities Limited
The London Stock Exchange Building
10 Paternoster Square
St Pauls
London 
EC4M 7LT 

Joint brokers 
Canaccord Genuity Limited
88 Wood Street
London
EC2V 7QR

Registrars 
Capita Registrars Ltd
The Registry
34 Beckenham Road
Beckenham
Kent
BR3 4TU

Bankers 
Barclays Bank Plc
Wytham Court
11 West Way
Oxford 
OX2 0JB

Public relations 
Camarco
107 Cheapside
London 
EC2V 6DN

Independent auditors 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
3 Forbury Place
23 Forbury Road
Reading
Berkshire 
RG1 3JH