Velocys plc
115e Olympic Avenue
Milton Park
Abingdon
Oxfordshire
OX14 4SA
Company Number: 05712187
www.velocys.com
Annual report and accounts 2016
Developing a platform for growth
3 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys
Velocys is the Company at the forefront of smaller scale gas-to-liquids
(GTL). It has a leadership position in connecting stranded and low value
feedstocks, such as natural gas, landfill gas or biomass, with markets
for premium products, such as renewable diesel, jet fuel and waxes.
With its partners, Velocys is focused on delivering the most economically-
compelling conversion solution; a fully integrated offer that can be
deployed repeatedly to achieve scale.
Developing a platform for growth
2016 has been an immensely important year for us.
Our significantly increased involvement and operational
control in the ENVIA Oklahoma plant has been critical to
achieving first product there. We continue to transform
the Company from being purely a technology provider to
one with solid in-house experience in project governance,
and GTL plant engineering and operations capabilities.
Highlights
ENVIA – involvement
January 2016 onwards
Greater equity stake and management
control in the project for Velocys after a
US$2.6m equity contribution and US$9.3m
secured loan facility were made available
to ENVIA. Key leadership role for Velocys in
the commissioning, start-up and operation
of the plant.
ENVIA – milestones
September 2016
Plant construction complete.
February 2017 (post-period end)
Production of first Fischer-Tropsch product.
Read more on page
8
Read more on page
8
Strategy
December 2016
Fundraise
May 2017 (post period end)
Review of Company strategy completed
and communicated. First strategic
alliances formed with Morimatsu and
TRI (post period end).
Fundraise of over £10m (before expenses)
to progress the implementation of the
new strategy.
Read more on pages
32
Read more on pages
16
17
Around the business
Appointed David Pummell as CEO.
Revenue of £1.4m (FY 2015: £2.0 m).
Projects being developed by third parties
Cash* at year end of £18.7m
continue to reach milestones:
(FY 2015: £37.7 m).
− Preliminary engineering studies
H2 2016 cash outflow of £5.4m
completed, including a GTL project in
Central Asia.
− Air permit granted on a third party project
versus H1 (£13.6m).
* Defined as cash, cash equivalents and short-
term investments (see note 23).
in the US.
Production of first Fischer-
Tropsch product at ENVIA,
which is the first commercial
smaller scale GTL plant in the
world, represented a significant
milestone for Velocys. We have
begun leveraging this success,
implementing our new strategy,
and focusing on specific markets
and developing the partnerships
to unlock them.”
David Pummell
CEO
Read more on pages
12
13
Front cover and above: ENVIA Energy’s GTL plant in Oklahoma City. ENVIA Energy is a joint
venture, of which Velocys is a member, formed in March 2014 to produce renewable fuels
and chemicals from landfill gas and natural gas.
Read more on page
8
Contents
0
Indicates references to other pages
in this annual report.
Indicates references to further
online content.
Chairman’s statement
ENVIA Energy project overview
Strategic report
2 Our business at a glance
2 Our strategy
4 Our focus markets
6
8
12 CEO’s report
14 Our technology
16 Financial review
17 Corporate social responsibility
17 Key performance indicators (KPIs)
18 Risks and mitigation
Governance
22 Corporate governance report
24 Our Board of directors
28 Directors’ report
30 Directors’ remuneration report
34 Statement of directors’ responsibilities
35
Independent auditors’ report
39
40
Financial statements
37 Consolidated income statement
38
Consolidated statement
of comprehensive income
Consolidated statement of financial
position
Velocys plc statement of financial
position
Consolidated statement of changes
in equity
Velocys plc statement of changes
in equity
Consolidated statement of cash flows
43
Velocys plc statement of cash flows
44
45
Notes to the financial statements
IBC Directors, secretary and advisors to
42
41
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 1
the Company
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
Our business at a glance
Velocys has a strong, multi-disciplinary staff operating
from its commercial centre in Houston, Texas and technical
facilities near Oxford, UK and Columbus, Ohio. We have
an experienced Fischer-Tropsch team, and our core
competences extend beyond technology development
to process engineering and the commissioning and
start-up of commercial gas-to-liquids (GTL) projects.
Business influences
Throughout the strategic report we highlight content relating
to four areas that will be critical to our future success.
Technical expertise
We are recognised as
leaders in smaller scale
GTL technology (plants with
capacities of 500 to 10,000
barrels per day). We have
expertise throughout the
design, commissioning and
operation of plants.
Commercial growth
First product has been
produced at the commercial
reference plant for Velocys’
technology – a physical
site where stakeholders
can see our technology in
situ. ENVIA Energy’s plant
will be a springboard for
commercial growth.
Development of an
integrated offer
In partnership, we are
adopting a proactive
approach, aiming to develop
a fully integrated and
cost-effective plant offer,
reducing delivery risk and
accelerating growth.
Focus markets
In the medium term we are
focused on a small number of
markets that we see as being
high growth and material:
renewable fuels in the US
(and targeted Asian markets)
and stranded gas-to-wax in
North America.
Our strategy
Background
The thorough review of Velocys’ strategy
undertaken in 2016 focused on the best
way to leverage the core assets and
capabilities of the Company in the most
attractive markets, where there should
be a clear advantage over its competition
through differentiation.
Strengths
ENVIA Energy’s Oklahoma City plant –
Market dynamics and challenges
Oil price slowly recovering from
first smaller scale GTL plant in the world.
Differentiated technology – recognised
cycle low.
Fully exploiting our first mover
as market leader.
advantage.
Prospective revenues from
Securing funding for Velocys plc and for
licensing model.
World class technology, engineering
capability and operations team.
Experienced leadership team.
first of a kind plants.
Relentlessly driving down overall plant
costs to access wider markets.
Four strategic aims
Business model –
Increase control but remain 'capital light'
Consolidate our market leading
Strategic alliances –
World class partnerships
Work with partners with
position.
Develop and deliver projects
with partners.
complementary resources
and capabilities.
Drive access and growth in material,
Grow revenues from reactor, catalyst,
high-return markets.
operations and licence.
Create scale and repeatability
Selectively inject early capital.
at pace.
Velocys has identified a number of
strategic aims; fundamentals on which
the Company will focus during the early
years of the roll out of its strategy.”
David Pummell
CEO
Read the CEO’s
report on pages
12
13
Velocys is well positioned,
and our newly focused
business model will drive
commercialisation in the
renewable fuels market,
enabling our technology
to be incorporated in
multiple plants with
standardised design.”
David Pummell
CEO
The offer –
One-stop shop
Develop fully integrated, financed,
cost-effective and operations-ready
plant solution.
Leverage differentiated capabilities –
Build from core technology base
Build and enhance technology,
engineering and operations capabilities.
Work seamlessly with partners.
Drive lowest cost.
Focus markets
As part of the strategy review the Company
identified the following attractive markets
on which it will continue to focus:
1. Renewable diesel and jet fuels, from
woody biomass, in US markets. This is
the market of Velocys’ immediate focus.
2. Premium wax products, from both
stranded gas and landfill gas in
North America.
3. Renewable fuels, from woody biomass,
in targeted Asian markets.
Velocys’ medium-term goals are to:
Build a leading market supply position
in the above markets.
Leverage the stranded GTL offer
developed in North America to access
Asian opportunities using stranded gas
as feedstock.
Develop an integrated GTL solution
to reduce the flaring of associated
gas offshore.
Read about our
markets on pages
54
Delivery through partnership
We aim to drive the roll out of Velocys’
technology by creating, with partners, an
integrated plant offer in each of the focus
markets, which includes fully integrated,
designed, constructed and commissioned
plants, fully financed, with feedstock and
offtake agreements in place. We intend
for this offer to be deployed across
multiple plants.
The first phase of strategy implementation
is to secure the robust technology
partnership platform needed to develop
the integrated offer for the renewable
fuels market in the US. In early 2017 we
announced the following new relationships:
Morimatsu, for modularisation and
fabrication.
TRI, for gasification technology.
Read more in our CEO’s
report on pages
12
13
The next phase is to put in place
a consortium of partners with the aim
of delivering the wider commercial
renewable fuels offer. Our commercial
team is now engaging with a range of
targeted potential partners from woody
biomass suppliers, commodity traders
and airlines, to providers of equity and debt
financing. Our intent is that these partners
will be strategically-aligned and have
complementary resources, capabilities
and influence in our target market to
support the roll out of a number of plants
and open up broader financing options.
We have set ourselves the challenging goal
of building this consortium and securing
the first final investment decision for a
renewable fuels plant.
The Company intends to assemble
a consortium of partners to deliver the
integrated offer for the stranded gas-to-
wax market over a longer timescale.
As well as developing its own integrated
offers for its focus markets, Velocys
will continue licensing its technology
to third party developers in these, and
other, markets.
Revenue streams
Velocys’ business model is based on
making a relatively low investment in
early stage project engineering and
site development to accelerate the
project development phase. This “capital
light” approach to commercialisation
demonstrates our commitment to our
technology and chosen routes to market.
Velocys’ revenue will predominantly flow
from the licensing of its technology, sales
of its reactors and catalyst, and revenues
from operations management support,
plant commissioning and start-up services.
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
2 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 3
Our focus markets
The strategy review identified a number of attractive markets
on which Velocys will focus its integrated offers, with the
objective of creating sustainable growth. The renewable fuels
market is Velocys’ immediate focus. This and the stranded
gas market offer significant volume and potential growth.
Offshore flared gas is a longer-term, substantial proposition.
Supply of renewable diesel and jet fuels and
premium wax products.
Monetisation of stranded gas, to produce wax
in North America.
An integrated GTL solution to reduce the flaring
of associated gas offshore.
Renewable fuels credits defined
RFS – US federal Renewable
Fuel Standard.
RIN – US federal Renewable
Identification Numbers credits.
LCFS – Californian Low Carbon
Fuel Standard.
Indicative renewable fuels credit values
are based on prices in February 2017.
Market of primary focus – renewable fuels
The mandates of the US RFS and the
Californian LCFS create an increasing
demand for cellulosic biofuels. In California
alone, a renewable diesel supply capacity
shortfall of 50,000 to 80,000 barrels per
day (bpd) is expected by 2023. For the US to
meet COP21 commitments of using a 3%
blend of renewable jet fuel in the overall fuel
pool, over 40,000 bpd of new capacity would
be needed by 2020. These are markets that
Velocys can address with its smaller scale
gas-to-liquids (GTL) technology. Using
certain feedstocks, fuels produced using
Fischer-Tropsch (FT) technology qualify for
the highest level of RIN credits, with a price
of around $194/barrel.
In California, Velocys’ renewable diesel
would qualify for the LCFS credit with an
additional value of $33/barrel (based on
a 60% greenhouse gas reduction relative
to conventional fuels). In these markets,
compared to other biomass-based fuel
production technologies, Velocys’ FT
technology is cost competitive, is less reliant
on incentives, has lower ongoing feedstock
costs and has access to an abundance of
potential feedstock.
This technology route is one of a very
small number of ways to produce
high quality renewable fuels that can
be blended at high percentages with
petroleum-based products and that are
compatible with existing infrastructure
and engines. This enables airlines and
truck fleet operators, for example, to meet
low carbon targets and corporate social
responsibility obligations.
The Company is also pursuing opportunities
for renewable fuels, from woody biomass,
in targeted Asian markets.
Stranded gas
Smaller scale GTL can be an economic
route to the monetisation of stranded
gas resources that are hard to exploit
by other means, even at times of low oil
prices. Velocys’ FT technology produces
high value waxes at volumes that match
market requirements. Speciality waxes
command high prices even when the oil
price is low. The economics for gas-to-
wax plants are competitive with other
gas monetisation options.
In this market Velocys is initially targeting
Western Canada, where gas prices in certain
fields are significantly lower than US market
prices and there is no other viable route to
market. This situation is expected to persist
over the long term. This route to market
could be adopted by Asian companies that
own fields in the region and replicated in
the other geographic markets where they
own stranded gas reserves. There is further
upside arising from an increased oil price,
when plants producing fuels (rather than
waxes) will become increasingly attractive.
Landfill gas
Approximately 250 million tonnes per year
of municipal solid waste is sent to landfill
in the US. The US Environmental Protection
Agency estimates that 17% of total
methane gas released from human activity
in the US is from municipal solid waste
landfills. As indicated at ENVIA’s Oklahoma
City plant, Velocys’ FT technology is well
placed to convert landfill gas to renewable
fuels and waxes, the markets for which
are discussed above. ENVIA continues to
evaluate future projects using learnings
from the first plant.
Longer-term market – offshore flared gas
With an identified partner, Velocys is
targeting the development of a unique
technical solution to unlock oil production
offshore, where no other economical means
of disposing of associated gas exists.
This is a very large market – over two billion
standard cubic feet of associated gas is
flared offshore every day. Flaring regulations
are tightening, and oil production from some
fields could be restricted, or prevented
altogether. A technology solution is needed
that makes use of the gas and enables
future offshore oil exploration.
Velocys plans initially to enter the extended
well test market in North America, where a
technology solution would provide a means
to avoid high costs associated with multiple
appraisal wells. Longer term, Velocys, with
its partners, aims to access the flared gas
market via on-board floating production,
storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels for
deployment in Asia and Latin America,
where a large proportion of offshore
associated gas is flared.
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
Markets of strategic focus
Key
Commercial
reference plant
Velocys site
Focus
markets
USA
Renewable fuels and speciality
products from landfill gas.
Renewable jet fuel from biomass.
Renewable diesel from biomass,
particularly in California.
Longer-term, prevention of gas
flaring offshore.
Western Canada
Monetisation of stranded gas.
Supply of premium waxes.
Asian market development
Renewable fuels in targeted
Asian markets.
Longer-term, prevention of gas
flaring offshore.
Note: Velocys will continue to license its technology to third party projects being developed in these and other regions.
Large addressable markets
Substantial potential volume and growth.
Landfill gas-to-wax, US
Renewable jet, US
Total addressable market
Renewable diesel, US
Stranded gas-to-wax, Canada
Indicative number of plants
Five year addressable market.
Ten year addressable market.
4 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 5
Pierre Jungels, CBE
Chairman
Velocys has a new focus,
a differentiated technology,
£10m of additional funding
and a strategy for growth with
which it is making good early
progress. Despite a challenging
funding environment and
a persistently low oil price
Velocys is developing a
platform for delivery that
should stand the Company
in good stead as we
move forward.”
Chairman’s statement
6 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
Introduction to our corporate governance
Our governance principles
Velocys has the ambition to grow
significantly, and to develop into an
established multinational business.
The Company is in the process of
implementing the required business level
governance that is both scalable and has
the flexibility to meet the requirements
of delivering the new strategy. This
governance covers the processes required
to manage a number of parallel routes
to market, with defined critical activities
and key milestones that will drive risk
management and decision making at
both the executive and Board levels.
The composition of the Board has reflected
the development of the Company, with
a shift in emphasis from technological
understanding to expertise in business,
legal and finance.
The switch in late 2015 to having most
Board members sitting on only one or
two committees demonstrated the new
focus that the Board has developed in its
corporate governance.
The governance report gives:
A clear and honest view of progress
throughout the year.
The outcome of our Board evaluation.
Disclosure of Board discussions and
the resulting actions.
Our approach to ensuring long-term
viability of the business.
Our approach to risk and mitigation.
Read the Corporate
governance report on pages
22
27
Taking a lead
Adopting the corporate governance
practices that the Company will need in
the future.
Managing risk
Assessing the risks facing the business and
overseeing management’s strategies for
mitigating these risks.
Engaging with shareholders
Ensuring shareholders are kept informed of
the Company’s direction and achievements
through regular contact.
Supporting management
Constructively challenging the team on its
plans and delivery.
Introduction
After 15 years of effort, it has been
immensely gratifying during 2016 to watch
ENVIA’s plant rise from an empty plot
outside Oklahoma City. This tangible result
is, however, just the end of the beginning;
the challenge for the next few years is
to transform the Company from having
started up one gas-to-liquids (GTL) plant
incorporating its technology into a highly
profitable business.
The Company has made significant
progress during the year in charting
a course to commercial success,
and in this, David Pummell has been
instrumental. The delivery of this strategy
will dominate the efforts of Velocys
over the coming years.
Management and Board
David Pummell was appointed as CEO of
Velocys in January 2016. He joined the
Company with considerable experience
to help us identify the right strategy and
implement sustainable growth – skills
that fit the Company’s current stage
of commercialisation and the future
direction of Velocys. His experience, ideas
and approach are complementary to the
Company’s senior management team
– which remains a highly effective and
able unit.
David is now focusing on how the
Company needs to be reorganised and
resourced to deliver our new strategy.
I thank the management team and all
the Company’s employees, for their
efforts and achievements this year.
Jan Verloop retired as a Non-Executive
Director in September 2016. The GTL
expertise that Jan brought to the Board
was pivotal in guiding the Company’s
technology development from an innovative
idea to a fully validated system. I thank him
warmly for his ten years of valued service.
Mark Chatterji stepped down from his
position as Non-Executive Director in April
2017. The Board is grateful to Mark for his
advice and support since his appointment
in September 2015.
We look forward to welcoming Andrew
Morris to the Board following the
completion of the proposed fundraising
(separately announced on 15 May 2017).
Strategy and markets
The review of Velocys’ strategy was
a thorough process involving considerable
internal resource, independent advice
and guidance, and a number of months
of concerted effort. Many market
opportunities were evaluated across
various dimensions to assess their
attractiveness and deliverability.
As a result the Board has confidence that
this is the right strategy to accelerate the
Company’s entry into attractive and high
growth markets, and to be the foundation
for delivering revenue growth and achieving
a sustainable cash generative business.
The funding environment in the oil
and gas industry remains challenging.
The Company’s strategy ensures it
is best prepared to withstand the
ongoing uncertainty in the sector.
During the strategy’s implementation,
partnerships and methods will be
carefully chosen to reduce delivery risk
and to make the integrated solution
attractive to financing.
Velocys’ fundraise in May 2017 of over
£10m (subject to the passing of certain
resolutions at a general meeting to be
held in June 2017) together with cash
brought forward (£18.7m at 2016 year
end) and the measures taken to preserve
cash will provide the Company with a
financial platform for the important initial
implementation phase of its strategy. The
Board recognises that further funding will
be needed in due course. Note 2 discusses
uncertainties surrounding the extent and
composition of future funding.
Velocys is focusing on defined, high value
markets with substantial short-term
potential for volume growth; the market of
most immediate focus is renewable fuels.
There is increasing pressure from legislation
and public opinion to curb greenhouse
gas emissions and reduce pollution.
This has led to long-standing incentives
for renewable fuel production in certain
regions, notably in the US. Congress and the
new US administration are continuing to
enforce laws and policies focused on energy
Outlook
Velocys has a new focus, a differentiated
technology, £10m of additional funding
and a strategy for growth with which it
is making good early progress. Despite
a challenging funding environment and
a persistently low oil price Velocys is
developing a platform for delivery that
should stand the Company in good stead
as we move forward. The successful
demonstration of the Company’s FT
technology at ENVIA Oklahoma, the first
smaller scale GTL plant in the world,
will have significant, positive impact
on this sector, not just this Company.
Pierre Jungels, CBE
Chairman
15 May 2017
security and independence, including the
renewable fuel standard, and jobs in rural
regions. Successful delivery of the Velocys
strategy would result in the construction of
multiple, repeatable renewable fuels plants
to meet this fundamental need.
Currently, Group I base oil facilities are
the largest source of supply for the global
wax industry. Wax pricing has remained
high, decoupled from the oil price, and
is forecast to strengthen because these
facilities, particularly in North America
and Europe, are being shut down and
replaced with newer facilities that do not
co-produce wax. Plant economics remain
favourable for smaller scale gas-to-wax
projects that access low price feedstocks,
including from certain stranded gas fields
in North America.
Our assessment of the focus markets
is that they should provide attractive
returns to both Velocys and its partners.
We estimate that these combined markets
have an addressable market size of 25-30
plants in the next five years and that they
have significant upside growth potential.
Velocys’ business model is well positioned
to exploit these opportunities and our goal
is to build an integrated offer and secure
the first final investment decision for
a renewable fuels plant.
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 7
ENVIA Energy project overview
ENVIA Energy is a joint venture, of which Velocys is a member, formed to produce renewable
fuels and chemicals from landfill gas and natural gas using GTL. ENVIA’s first plant,
in Oklahoma City, will act as the commercial reference plant for Velocys’ technology.
Aerial view of ENVIA’s plant.
Milestones achieved
The historic moment for Velocys’ technology
came in early February 2017, with the
start-up of the Fischer-Tropsch (FT)
process units and the first FT product was
successfully produced; a truly momentous
milestone for the Company. The performance
data (for example, for syngas purity,
methane selectivity, liquid production,
carbon monoxide conversion and activity
index) that are available from the ENVIA
plant meet the performance expectations
set using models based on laboratory and
pilot studies. Targets for the conversion of
syngas to FT products and the yield of liquid
products were achieved within 12 hours
of the first start-up of the FT modules (the
equivalent of one shift of plant operators).
This achievement came at the end of a
sustained period of activity at the Oklahoma
City site, as well as at suppliers’ sites,
during 2015 and 2016. Manufacture and
certification of the Velocys FT reactors
destined for use at ENVIA were completed
by the Company’s supply chain partners in
September 2015. From the spring of 2016
the modular process units, the building
blocks of the GTL plant, started to be
delivered and set in place on site after being
trucked from their fabrication facility near
Houston, Texas. All other major packaged
equipment skids, including the steam
methane reformer, were delivered over the
same time-frame. The number of personnel
on site in Oklahoma peaked at over 150.
The lifeblood of the GTL process, the FT
catalyst, made by a specialist manufacturer
under contract to Velocys, was delivered
to Oklahoma in September 2016. Velocys
personnel were responsible for loading
8 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
it into the reactors, which was duly
accomplished with support from the
Company’s internationally-recognised
partner, Mourik.
In September, with the construction of the
plant complete, the pre-commissioning
and commissioning process could begin.
All the lines and vessels were hydro-tested
and a rigorous plant-wide inspection
process was completed. In line with best
practice, the process systems were started
up in sequence when upstream units were
confirmed to be working robustly and
safely. In such a way ENVIA best assured
a successful, safe and stable start-up.
Next steps
At the time of writing, the operations team
has completed debugging several (non-
Fischer-Tropsch) units of the plant and will
implement the pre-planned programme of
ramping up production to target operational
capacity over the coming months. Such
activities are routine at this stage of starting
up a plant of this complexity. First finished
products (waxes, diesel and naphtha) are
likely to be produced in a matter of weeks.
In parallel, we are starting to welcome key
stakeholders to visit the plant and witness
first-hand Velocys’ technology in situ.
A large proportion of the products made
at the plant is manufactured using landfill
gas – a renewable resource. Under the
Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) ENVIA
has an approved pathway to generate RIN
qualifying fuels. ENVIA expects to receive
confirmation that the plant is operating as
intended in the pathway, thus confirming the
greenhouse gas reduction and the category
of RIN credits generated.
Increased operational control for Velocys
In January 2016, as part of a stakeholder
capital contribution, Velocys made available
to ENVIA additional funding of US$11.9m
(made up of an equity contribution and
a loan commitment). As a result of this
funding arrangement, Velocys increased
its ownership share and was awarded
additional voting rights, taking its share of
voting rights to 28%. We also sought and
gained greater operational management
involvement in the project (see note 20).
Read more on page
17
Since that time Velocys has been
supporting the Engineering, Procurement
and Construction (EPC) contractor by,
for example, providing an operability review,
operating procedures and commissioning
management. Additionally, under a
secondment agreement with ENVIA,
a Velocys operations team, which has
worked under the ENVIA Plant Manager
since July 2016, has brought essential
support to the ENVIA team during
commissioning, start-up and early stage
operations. As planned, the majority of the
Velocys team was demobilised in Q1 2017 as
the permanent ENVIA operations team was
phased in and fully trained. A small number
of key Velocys staff are being seconded to
ENVIA over a longer transition period and
the wider Velocys team remains available to
support ENVIA operations, as needed.
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
The ENVIA plant and the East Oak landfill site in the foreground with downtown Oklahoma City just visible on the skyline (left). The plant is co-fed by landfill gas
produced at the adjacent landfill site and pipeline natural gas.
Fischer-Tropsch reactor manufacture at Velocys’
supply chain partner in 2015.
Inside the control room.
Roger Harris in the tank farm.
From landfill gas to product offtake (foreground).
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 9
ENVIA Energy project overview (continued)
World-class operational expertise
Members of the team talk about their previous experience and the Company’s
involvement at the ENVIA plant.
Q
A
A
Q
A
Q
A
What previous experience did you
bring to the ENVIA project?
“I have more than 10 years’
experience of the commercialisation
of new chemical and large-scale
GTL processes in countries such
as South Africa and Qatar.”
Roger Harris
Senior Manager, Operations
& Technology Commercialisation
“I have more than a decade of FT
technology experience. I was the FT
lead licensor for a commercial start-
up of a GTL plant in the Nigerian Delta
with a capacity of over 30,000 barrels
per day.”
Johan Malan
Commissioning Manager
What skills does the on-site Velocys
team bring to the project?
“We’ve brought in a wide range of
Velocys personnel. Our catalyst
loading team successfully loaded
the commercial FT reactors on
site. We’ve also taken a team
of experienced people from our
R&D teams and our pilot plant
and seconded them to the ENVIA
operations team. These people
come with a wealth of experience in
the development of our technology
and most of them were involved in
Velocys’ demonstration-scale plants
such as at one of Petrobras’ sites
in Brazil. We’ve also pulled together
a highly experienced and motivated
commissioning and start-up team.”
Roger Harris
What is involved during the
commissioning of a plant such
as this?
“Commissioning is all about the
details and executing activities in
a carefully pre-planned sequence
to ensure safe and optimal
progress. Every line needs to be
flushed and blown down, every
instrument loop checked and every
unit prepared according to the
vendor’s specifications to ensure
a successful start-up. The steps
that have to be undertaken are very
similar for any GTL plant, whether
large or small- scale.”
Johan Malan
Q
A
Q
A
A
Q
A
How did the joint venture prepare for
the start-up of the plant?
“The team made extensive and
detailed preparations for start-up;
operating manuals and procedures
have been fully completed and
robust commissioning and
start-up plans put in place.”
Johan Malan
Why is the project in Oklahoma City
so significant?
“First product at ENVIA represented
a huge milestone for Velocys as
well as a significant step for ENVIA
and the wider industry. It will be
a springboard for the successful
implementation of Velocys’ new
strategy, in particular demonstrating
to potential partners the credibility
of our technology, people and
selected routes to markets.”
David Pummell
CEO
“Successful operation will provide
commercial-scale performance
data for stakeholders to analyse
and a physical, tangible site where
they can see our technology in situ.
It’s an impressive site and plant
performance data that have been
collected are aligned with our pilot
plant data and process models.”
Paul Schubert
COO
Will the Oklahoma City project lead to
future projects with ENVIA?
“The Oklahoma City plant is a
commercial demonstration of our
technology and will confirm that
landfill gas can be converted to
high value products. There are
significant opportunities at landfills
across the US to leverage the
Oklahoma experience with our
partners. ENVIA has been evaluating
how to best use the learnings
from Oklahoma and put the right
plans in place for future projects.”
David Pummell
A wealth of experience on site from Velocys’ R&D
and pilot plant teams and from personnel with
experience at large-scale commercial GTL plants.
www.velocys.com/media_videopage15_ENVIA_OKC.php
View a video about Velocys’ involvement in ENVIA’s plant and the
significance of the project to the Company.
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 11
Some of the Fischer-Tropsch modules including those incorporating the Velocys Fischer-Tropsch reactors (right).
Paul Schubert (COO) and David Pummell (CEO) take a tour of the site with Johan Malan (Commissioning Manager).
10 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
David Pummell
Chief Executive Officer
Developing a platform for growth
First product achieved at ENVIA
(February 2017).
Commercial scale validation of
our technology.
World-class operational
expertise demonstrated.
Definition of new Company
strategy and good early progress
with its implementation.
Fundraise in Q2 2017 provides
funding for immediate
strategy initiatives.
CEO’s report
Introduction
Looking back on my first year as CEO of
Velocys I see that my initial optimism about
the Company was well-founded. Velocys
has a proven and uniquely competitive
technology, employs a dedicated and
knowledgeable workforce, and, with first
Fischer-Tropsch product achieved at
ENVIA Oklahoma City, we have a market
leading position.
2016 has been a year of establishing
a platform for Velocys’ future growth.
I have been enormously impressed with
the advances made month-by-month by
the high-performing on-site team at the
ENVIA plant, and first product has now
been achieved. Building on that position,
our strategy has defined Velocys’ future
direction and the recent fundraise maintains
our financial position so that we can start to
implement the entry into our focus markets,
with an initial focus on renewable fuels
in the US.
Commercial strategy
My approach to management is
continuously to drive simplicity, focus,
delivery and robustness in everything we
do. We took this approach to the strategy
review carried out in 2016, and will continue
to follow this path through every aspect of
its roll out. The new strategy builds on the
Company’s successes to date, but adopts
a business model in which we aim to
considerably extend our influence over the
integrated offer, project delivery and partner
selection in specific high value markets that
will enable us to grow the business in those
areas identified in the strategy review.
12 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
A core theme of the new business model is to
develop, jointly with partners, an integrated
offer to customers in each market. Together,
we are assembling all the necessary
components for projects, including the
integration of other licensors’ technologies,
to develop cost effective and operationally-
ready plants, which are fully financed with
feedstock and offtake agreements, and
which could be deployed across multiple
plants. This approach aims to create
repeatable and scalable standard offers
in each of our focus markets and starting
with the renewable fuels market, to drive
us towards establishing material market
positions.
We will continue to refine our strategy as
progress is made on the renewable fuels
integrated offer. The Board is examining
options to provide funding beyond the
immediate strategy initiatives.
Velocys is committed to its technology
and invests prudently in preliminary
stage project engineering and project
management to accelerate the route to
market. This committed approach by
Velocys is intended to be highly attractive
to potential future strategic partners who
would invest significant capital in these
plants in due course. These early project
investments would be converted into minor
equity positions, as Velocys does not plan to
take substantial equity stakes in projects
incorporating its technology.
Focus markets
We have identified attractive markets on
which Velocys will now focus to create
sustainable high-growth businesses in
the medium term. More details are given
on page 4. We are developing alliances
with companies that have the resources,
scale and capabilities to support Velocys in
accessing these markets and driving growth.
Strategy milestones reached
In Q1 2017 we announced the signing of
commercial agreements with two strategic
partners. TRI and Morimatsu are our
partners for gasification technology and
modularisation and fabrication engineering
respectively. Both companies are innovative
leaders in their fields and have committed
significant resources to joint work
programmes that are already underway.
Relentlessly driving to the most cost effective
integrated plant offer is a cornerstone of our
strategy. Key enablers are the modularisation
of plants, routes to high quality and low
cost fabrication, sourcing of equipment
from the most competitive suppliers and
the continuous improvement of plant
integration engineering. This approach drives
down capex and opex and also reduces
the plant build schedule and risk of delays.
With Morimatsu's, we are scoping out a
programme of work to maximise these
benefits across all gas-to-liquids (GTL)
and biomass-to-liquids (BTL) plants. This
ongoing collaboration builds on Morimatsu’s
successful delivery of targeted cost and
footprint reductions in their design of the
Fischer-Tropsch (FT) section of the plant.
With TRI we have begun the development
of a joint engineering design for a BTL plant
incorporating Velocys’ FT technology with
TRI’s proven gasification technology to
produce renewable diesel and jet fuel from
woody biomass. TRI has agreed to support
Velocys and its partners to further optimise
overall plant costs and the financing of
BTL plants through, for example, accessing
governmental loan guarantee schemes
and grants that would play a key role in
de-risking the financing of the first BTL plant.
The commercial team is maintaining its
efforts to build the consortium of partners
that, we believe, will underpin a financial
investment decision (FID) for a renewable
fuels plant next year. There is a long way to
go but I’m encouraged by the very positive
engagement of potential partners who
express the belief that we represent a
credible route to building many plants
in our chosen markets.
ENVIA Energy
The plant in Oklahoma City is the first
commercial smaller scale GTL plant in the
world. There was intense activity on site
throughout 2016; the milestones achieved
during the year are outlined on page 8.
The first product milestone is as much a
landmark event for the industry as it is for
Velocys and ENVIA. At the time of writing,
the operations team has completed
debugging several (non-Fischer-Tropsch)
units of the plant and will implement the
pre-planned programme of ramping up
production to target operational capacity
over the coming months. Such activities are
routine at this stage of starting up a plant
of this complexity. First finished products
(waxes, diesel and naphtha) are likely to be
produced in a matter of weeks. In parallel,
we are starting to welcome key stakeholders
to visit the plant and witness first-hand
Velocys’ technology in situ.
We are delighted that the commissioning
team delivered a safe and successful
start-up of the FT modules and upstream
units during a challenging period of
exceptionally cold weather. There is a
highly competent and experienced team
on site that gets on with whatever needs
to be done, solving the challenges that
typically arise during the commissioning
of a plant in the most professional way.
My thanks go to the entire team, whose
continued efforts have been instrumental
in achieving this milestone.
In January 2016, Velocys made available
to ENVIA additional funding of US$11.9m
(made up of an equity contribution and
loan commitment). Additional equity
ownership and voting rights were granted to
the Company and Velocys secured greater
operational management involvement in the
project. Through that increased involvement
we have built on our market-leading
technology base, enhancing our capabilities
and strengthening our position as a Company
with real-world operational capability.
Construction, commissioning and start-
up of ENVIA’s plant have naturally brought
many learning points that Velocys will use
in future projects. These include plant-wide
integration design improvements that will
increase the efficiency and economics of
future GTL plants.
The culmination of 15 years of incredible
endeavour by Velocys has been realised
at ENVIA Oklahoma City, the first smaller
scale GTL plant in the world, where we have
proven our technology and demonstrated
our operational capabilities. We believe
this will provide a firm foundation for
growing the business at pace in our
chosen strategic markets. We have a
differentiated technology and we are
now creating routes to market that
will enable us to build material market
positions. This is attracting considerable
interest from world class potential
partners and we are actively engaged
in commercial discussions.”
Other projects
As previously reported, in the first half of
2016 Velocys investigated the potential
acquisition of certain GTL assets of a
US-based company that was in bankruptcy
proceedings. However, it emerged that the
deal available to Velocys was not in the
Company’s best interests and so it was
not pursued to completion.
Velocys is keeping its options open regarding
its Ashtabula site. The Company currently
sees Western Canada as a promising
location for a first gas-to-wax plant,
where there is an abundance of stranded
gas. Much of the work undertaken for the
Ashtabula project (partners, engineering
and knowledge of wax market dynamics)
is entirely transferable to a wax plant of
the same size at a different location.
Velocys will continue to license its technology
to third party projects. A number of projects
in Velocys’ sales pipeline have continued to
progress during 2016, albeit slower than
we would have liked. Operation of ENVIA’s
plant is expected to accelerate some of
these opportunities and stimulate the
development of other third-party projects
as well as those in our strategic markets.
The opportunity with a major fuels player
in the US remains active; the air permit
was issued for the plant in the summer
of 2016. Red Rock Biofuels is still pursuing
funding for its biomass-to-liquids plant
of over 1,100 barrels per day (bpd) using
forestry waste as feedstock in Oregon, USA.
The funding process is taking longer than
expected but Red Rock remains focused on
achieving final investment decision this year.
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
Two engineering studies were completed by
Velocys and its project partners in 2016:
A project being developed on behalf of
a national gas company in Central Asia
that is seeking to develop its stranded
gas reserves. Velocys’ project partner is
waiting for confirmation on the feedback
from the project sponsor.
The development of a waste-to-liquids
project in the UK to produce jet fuel.
Velocys is reviewing options with
potential partners.
Pilot plant and technology
One of our most significant assets,
the Velocys pilot plant, was put into
standby mode in Q2 2016 following the
completion of a comprehensive testing
programme. Later this year we plan to
relocate the skid-mounted FT section
of the pilot plant from Ohio to TRI’s facility
in Durham, North Carolina, where it will
form part of an integrated gasification/FT
technology demonstration. This will provide
additional assurances to prospective project
investors and lenders for BTL plants, and
is a requirement for the US Department
of Agriculture loan guarantee qualification.
Also in 2016, a third-party independent
engineering firm validated Velocys’ design
for larger 700 bpd FT reactors, use of which
will substantially reduce the costs of larger
plants. This positions Velocys well to respond
cost-effectively to the needs of customers
developing projects with plant capacities
towards the upper end of its target range.
Outlook
In 2016 we developed a strategy for our
sustainable future growth and we have
made a fair start to 2017. Visitors to the
Oklahoma City site, many of them potential
partners, are struck by the physical reality
of this achievement and are leaving with
a real sense of the calibre of the team on
the ground, and the significant potential of
Velocys’ technology and strategic business
model. We have two priorities for 2017: firstly
the implementation of the strategy, with
focus on setting up the strategic consortium
for the renewable fuels market that will
aim to deliver multiple FIDs, operating
plants and associated revenues in the
coming years; and secondly, supporting the
ENVIA team to achieve stable, full-capacity
production with US federal renewable fuel
credit qualification.
David Pummell
Chief Executive Officer
15 May 2017
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 13
Our technology
Velocys’ technology is specifically designed for smaller scale
gas-to-liquids (GTL) and biomass-to-liquids (BTL), combining
super-active catalysts with intensified reactor systems.
The technology is protected by several hundred patents
in over 30 countries. Standardised modular plants can
be deployed readily in a wide range of locations.
Cost-competitive, proven technology
Velocys is recognised as the technology
market leader. Our Fischer-Tropsch (FT)
technology has been tested for 1.3 million
hours in the laboratory and for over
26,000 hours at pilot/demonstration scale.
It is operationally ready and has now
been deployed commercially at ENVIA’s
Oklahoma City plant.
Particularly in today’s oil price environment,
asset owners and project developers
need to select a technology that allows
them to achieve the best possible
economic returns from their plant. Our FT
reactor and catalyst system delivers
high conversion efficiencies and yields
of valuable, premium grade products.
This increases the revenues that can be
derived from a plant with a given input,
enabling plant operators to penetrate
markets (e.g. for high-value waxes) that
would otherwise be inaccessible, and
insulating projects from oil price volatility.
Use of Velocys’ high stability catalyst
results in an increased plant up-time.
Velocys’ customers can expect to use each
batch of catalyst for at least two years, and
potentially much longer, before change-out.
Velocys technology is robust, and
optimised not only for peak performance
but also to meet the challenges of everyday
variations in, for example, feedstock
composition. All the protocols required
to operate a commercial plant have
been demonstrated.
We maintain a targeted investment
programme in engineering and technology
know-how, to further optimise the
technology and integrated plant design,
and to improve the financial performance
of GTL and BTL plants.
Capabilities in partnership
Working with strong partners that
have complementary capabilities is
contributing significantly to our aim
of offering the most cost effective FT
and fully integrated plant solution
in our target markets. This extended
capability through partnership will enable
continued optimisation, standardisation
and modularisation of plant engineering
that will be the foundation for delivering
multiple, repeatable plants.
Velocys FT reactor cores.
One of Velocys' completed four-core FT reactors.
Revenue streams from technology sales
Revenues for Velocys will predominately flow from licensing its technology, initial sales of its reactors and
catalyst, and ongoing sales of its catalyst (approximately every two years) throughout the lifetime of a plant.
Key:
Catalyst revenue
Reactor sales
Licensing fees
Project development cost/
investment
Returns from project
Cumulative (licensing,
catalyst and reactor sales)
Cumulative
(all revenue streams)
e
l
i
f
o
r
p
e
u
n
e
v
e
r
e
v
i
t
a
c
i
d
n
I
t
c
e
j
o
r
p
e
l
g
n
i
s
a
m
o
r
f
0
14 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Years
-2
-1
Engineering
phase
1
0
Construction
phase
3
2
Operating
phase
4
5
6
7
8
Revenues as
per years 7 and
8 for remaining
lifetime of plant
(20 years)
Beyond final investment decision (FID)
Processes
The GTL and BTL processes
have three main steps:
production of syngas, the
Fischer-Tropsch (FT) process
and subsequent upgrading
to produce finished products:
high quality diesel, jet fuel and
speciality products as well
as naphtha.
Products
Fuels
With the demand for diesel
and jet fuel increasing, BTL
can provide the renewable
fuels that the US commodity
market demands, and for
which attractive incentivisation
schemes have been created
through both federal and
state credits. FT fuels are
fully compatible with existing
infrastructure and engines,
which is not the case for
other methods of natural gas
monetisation (LNG and CNG)
or other methods of producing
fuels from biomass (such as
ethanol or fatty acid esters).
FT products are highly
paraffinic and do not contain
aromatics or sulphur. FT
fuels burn cleaner than
petroleum-derived fuels,
resulting in lower emissions
of NOx, SOx and particulates.
Use of high-purity FT diesel
also reduces engine noise
and reduces wear and tear
on vital engine components.
FT fuels are often blended to
instil their high performance
(high Cetane) characteristics
into lower quality petroleum-
derived fuels.
Waxes
The purity and consistency of
FT waxes is highly desirable
in downstream processes,
such as the production of
cosmetics, pharmaceuticals
and adhesives.
There is a rising global demand
for waxes, though the wax
market, both in the US and
worldwide, continues to
undergo structural changes,
which have decreased supply
and decoupled wax pricing
from the oil price, making
a smaller scale GTL plant
targeting the production of
waxes an attractive proposition.
Velocys is best placed to take
advantage of this opportunity.
Our technology is best-in-class
in terms of yield of long chain
hydrocarbons, which form the
basis of high value, premium
wax products.
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
Gas-to-liquids
Biomass-to-liquids
Natural
gas
or
Landfill
gas
or
Biomass
Reformer
or
Gasifier
Syngas generation
The production of synthesis
gas (syngas), an optimised
mixture of carbon monoxide
and hydrogen, by reforming
natural gas or landfill gas, or
by gasification of biomass.
Syngas
The Velocys
Fischer-Tropsch
process
Raw FT
product
Upgrading
The Fischer-Tropsch
process
The FT process converts
the syngas into paraffinic
hydrocarbons. Velocys’
technology addresses this
stage of the process.
Upgrading
Upgrading to produce
finished products such as
high-value, premium quality
waxes, diesel and jet fuel,
as well as naphtha.
Waxes
Diesel
Jet fuel
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 15
Susan Robertson
Chief Financial Officer
The fundraise in Q2 2017
together with cash brought
forward (£18.7m at 2016 year
end) provide the Company with
a financial platform for the
important initial implementation
phase of its drive towards
commercialisation.”
Financial review
Environment
Velocys is careful to monitor the
environmental impact of its operations.
Air travel and buildings operation have been
identified as two of the major factors in the
Company’s CO2 emissions.
In 2016 air travel on the Company’s behalf
contributed 467t of CO2 (2015: 497t). This
equates to 5.2t per employee (2015: 4.6t).
The proportion of air travel that was between
the Company’s offices in Oxfordshire, Ohio
and Texas was 54% (2015: 51%); 8% of the
emissions arose from travel to the site of
ENVIA’s plant in Oklahoma.
Emissions attributable to operation of its
three sites included 769t from consumption
of electricity (2015: 1,042t). The reduction
was due to the Company signing up to plans
from providers with an energy mix that
favoured renewables and relied less on coal
as a source of power. Emissions attributable
to the consumption of gas were 436t (2015:
1,137t). This reduction was mainly due
to having put the Velocys pilot plant into
standby mode in Q2 of 2016.
Key performance
indicators (KPIs)
Aside from the financial results outlined
on pages 16-17 KPIs for the business are
changing as a result of the strategy review.
Most will be focused towards the delivery
of the strategy although there will also
be some underlying indicators such as
technology robustness, supply chain and
the Company’s expertise and resources.
The performance of the Company is
expanded upon in the CEO’s report on
pages 12-13.
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
in H1 and H2 respectively. This imbalance
was a result of the measures taken to
preserve cash as well as the exceptional
net expense of £2.4m it incurred in H1
in its pursuit of acquiring certain US
GTL assets in administration (see note
4). This reduced underlying cost base
has been carried forward into 2017 and
the Company intends to continue taking
measures to minimise its underlying cost
base whilst continuing to spend prudently
on strategy implementation.
The very large swing in the sterling to US
dollar exchange rate in the wake of the
UK’s vote to leave the European Union
gave rise to a £3.2m gain, recorded in
Finance income in the Income statement.
This reflected revaluation of the Company’s
dollar cash assets, and maturity of its
forward foreign exchange contracts (see
note 27). A further gain of £7.3m due to the
translation of non-cash, US denominated
assets was recorded through reserves.
ENVIA funding
In January 2016 Velocys made available
$11.9m to ENVIA, which was made up of
a $2.6m equity contribution and a $9.3m
loan commitment. $0.4m of the loan had
been drawn down by ENVIA by the end of
2016 and it is anticipated that the entirety
of the remaining loan amount will be drawn
down in H1 2017. The loan has a 10%
coupon. In May 2017 Velocys extended
its loan agreement with ENVIA to $12.7m
(see below).
Fundraise
In May 2017 Velocys secured additional
funding of over £10m (before expenses
and subject to the passing of certain
resolutions at a general meeting to be
held shortly). This included convertible
loan notes as well as a placing of new
ordinary shares.
Proceeds from the fundraise will be used to
fund working capital during the first phase
of strategy implementation, particularly
in the renewable fuels focus area, as well
as the following activities to support the
development of the integrated plant offer
in that focus market:
Initial engineering for US biomass-to-
liquid (BTL) plants.
Integrated technology demonstration
for BTL.
Project development activities (site
selection, permitting).
Consultants and financing (US
sponsored programmes etc.).
The proceeds of the fundraise will also
be used to maintain sufficient financial
resources to support ENVIA’s early
operations over the coming few months.
Future funding
The financial statements have been
prepared on the going concern basis,
which assumes that the Company will
have sufficient funds available to enable
it to continue to trade for the foreseeable
future. Management’s financial forecasts
of the Company’s likely cash requirements
include the following assumptions: (i)
the Oklahoma City project reaching full
operational capacity in 2017 (ii) the costs
of ongoing development projects and the
Company’s ability to reduce certain overhead
costs (iii) the Company raising additional
funding during 2018. These assumptions are
discussed further in note 2.
Susan Robertson
Chief Financial Officer
15 May 2017
Corporate social
responsibility
Employees
Velocys is committed to being a good
employer and endeavours to train staff
well, to pay them fairly and to maintain a
safe environment in which they can work.
Velocys is committed to equal opportunity
for all its employees. Of the 76 people
working for Velocys at 31 December
2016, 33% were women (2015: 31%).
The proportion has increased from a quarter
to a third in the last two years. In 2016 two of
the eight members of the Board were women
(2015: two of nine members). The percentage
of female employees broken down by areas
of the business was as follows.
2016 2015
Scientific & engineering
26% 25%
Sales, finance, HR & admin
56% 55%
Senior managers
29% 33%
Velocys keeps detailed environmental,
health, and safety records and takes the
safety and well-being of its employees very
seriously. As an example, the Columbus,
Ohio site successfully renewed its US
Department of Labor Occupational Safety
and Health Administration certification as
meeting the requirements of its Consultation
Safety and Health Recognition Program for
an additional three years. This programme
is a forward-looking, active-prevention
safety programme requiring participation
from highest management through all tiers
of employees working at a site. During 2016
there were no Lost-Time Accidents (LTA)
across the Company’s sites, which took
the total number of operating labour hours
without such an accident to over 2.8m.
Revenues
Revenue in 2016 was £1.4m (2015: £2.0m),
which was entirely made up of service
income from a number of engineering
design studies and operational support
services, including the secondment of
employees to ENVIA’s plant. This was
in line with budget expectations. Gross
margin was £0.4m (2015: £0.7m).
There was one key contract, with ENVIA.
Revenue for reactor sales to ENVIA was
recognised in 2015, while revenue from the
lease of catalyst to ENVIA will start to be
recognised in the financial results for H1
2017. Velocys expects to receive additional
revenue from ENVIA from the change-out of
its catalyst approximately every two years.
Expenses and income
Total administrative expenses decreased
to £17.4m before exceptional items and
£20.2m after exceptional items (2015:
£25.5m before/£26.7m after exceptional
items). The reduction reflected placing
the Velocys pilot plant into standby mode,
scaling back external project development
spending and rigorous cost reduction
across the Company, while it aimed to
secure additional project revenues. In
selecting measures to adopt, a primary
concern of the Company has been to
ensure that they will not impact Velocys’
ability to deliver its commitments at
ENVIA nor its core capabilities.
Other income of £0.3m before exceptional
items (£2.8m after exceptional items – see
below), was from a legal settlement (2015:
£2.0m/£3.8m before/after exceptional
items) (see note 9).
The exceptional items in 2016 included
costs incurred during the pursuit of
an opportunity to acquire certain gas-
to-liquids (GTL) assets of a US-based
company in administration, and the release
of deferred revenue on the cancellation
of the Ventech contract. The exceptional
items in 2015 included the full impairment
of the discounted value of expected future
income upon obtaining a final investment
decision for the Ashtabula project
and release of deferred consideration.
See note 4.
Assets and cash
Net assets of the Company were £63.7m,
down from £68.5m in 2015; the main
change was due to the cash outflow
offset by the impact of the stronger US
dollar exchange rate on the Company’s US
denominated assets. Having experienced
a reduced spend in H2, Velocys retained a
cash balance (cash and cash equivalents)
at year end totalling £18.7m (2015: £37.7m),
which has been subsequently increased
with the addition of over £10m from the
fundraise in May 2017 (see below).
Cash outflow in 2016 (excluding share
issues) was £19.0m (2015: £22.0m).
Cash outflow was £13.6m and £5.4m
16 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 17
Risks and mitigation
The principal risks and uncertainties that are considered to have a potentially
material impact on the Company’s long-term performance and achievement
of its strategy are set out in the following table.
Business influences
2
Risk description and impact
Operating risks
Performance of Velocys’ technology
Velocys’ core technology may not produce the quantity
and/or quality of product expected.
Supporting technologies at a gas-to-liquids (GTL) plant
may not operate according to specification, preventing
the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) section of a plant from
functioning optimally.
Inexpert operation of the plant may produce poorer
than predicted performance.
Performance of integrated technology offer for
biomass-to-liquids (BTL) plants
Technology, such as syngas production or upgrading,
supplied by other licensors, may not function as hoped.
Incorrect operation of other licensors’ technologies could
cause the plant to fail, or to operate sub-optimally.
Business
influences
Risk management strategy
The Company rigorously tests its technology in the lab and
pilot plant, modelling client-specific and upset conditions.
A robust quality assurance programme is followed for the
supply of commercial catalyst and reactors.
The performance of the ENVIA plant observed to date
indicates that the core technology is operating well and
that it meets performance expectations according to
models based on lab and pilot studies. Current activities at
ENVIA involve debugging and debottlenecking, as is routine
at this stage of start-up. Performance at ENVIA will be a
good indicator of performance at other plants.
Velocys works closely with plant operators on plant
integration issues, including the protection of Velocys’
FT technology from potential malfunctions in upstream
units. ENVIA has operated the other sections of the plant
in a mode that would have identified major problems
with the supporting systems if they were present.
No major problems were discovered. Risks remaining
include, for example, vibration in pumps at high capacity,
and insufficient heat within a specific vessel or pipe.
Resolutions to these types of issues are straightforward
(such as adding an auxiliary heater) and do not require
modifications to the basic technology or discovery of
new methodologies. A similar process is anticipated at
other plants.
The Velocys team, which has been pivotal in the
commissioning and start-up of the ENVIA plant, includes
employees that have been at all of Velocys’ field trials,
and personnel that participated in the commissioning
and start-up of large scale GTL plants in South Africa,
Qatar and Nigeria. This expertise has been transferred to
the plant operators through Velocys’ involvement in writing
operating manuals and providing training. A small number
of key Velocys personnel will remain seconded to ENVIA for
much of 2017 and Velocys’ personnel will be available to
ENVIA for consultation over a longer time frame. A similar
arrangement will be offered to operators of future plants.
When selecting partners Velocys will continue to work with
technology companies that have proven track records of
commercial operation.
Velocys and its new partner TRI are collaborating on a joint
technology demonstration to reduce the technology integration
and plant financing risks associated with the development of
a BTL plant.
Risk description and impact
Operating risks (continued)
Health, safety and/or environment issues at a plant
An accident or other incident might occur at a plant
incorporating Velocys’ technology, resulting in injury to
personnel or their exposure to hazardous conditions.
An environmental incident might occur at a plant;
emissions could exceed the permitted level.
Loss of intellectual property (IP) protection
Velocys’ IP could be copied or infringed.
Velocys’ IP could be threatened by an attack on its
IT systems.
Supply chain
The supply chain may not be able to deliver reactors and
catalyst on a timescale to meet customers’ expectations.
Employee retention and recruitment
Velocys may not be able to scale the organisation to
deliver the integrated offer.
Velocys may lose key personnel that are needed to
support, for example, the start-up of commercial
plants or supply chain delivery.
1. Technical expertise
2. Commercial growth
3. Development of an integrated offer
4. Focus markets
Business
influences
Risk management strategy
The Company has an excellent in-house safety record.
All employees are properly trained according to OSHA
requirements for handling hazardous substances. Automatic
trips and alarms are incorporated in plant designs to minimise
the risk of such conditions arising. Having produced many of
the training materials and operating manuals for the ENVIA
plant, and gained operational experience on site, Velocys will
aim to ensure that best operating practice is always adopted
by plant owners. However, this is not within Velocys’ control,
and so Velocys’ contracts state that it shall not be liable to
licensees for environmental, toxic waste, hazardous waste
or pollution liability.
The ENVIA plant has been designed to account for expected
upset conditions and operate well within the emissions
restrictions. Plant personnel are trained in proper operating
procedures and to identify issues that could lead to an
environmental situation developing and to act accordingly. This
would be replicated at other plants. Other measures as above.
Velocys actively manages its intellectual property, with
several hundred patents currently held in around 30
countries. The Company has demonstrated its ability and
ongoing determination to defend this portfolio through the
courts, resulting in favourable settlements.
The Company has an email management system that
stops malicious email from being delivered, and training
programmes are in place to enable employees to identify
threats from such emails. A security solution is in place to
automatically detect and neutralise malware. To secure
data at rest, Velocys uses encrypted drives in all mobile
devices that leave its premises. The Company uses security
appliances to protect the network from intrusion and
hard security measures to prevent unauthorised physical
access to servers.
Velocys has longstanding relationships with its vendors
for reactors, reactor components, and catalyst. The
manufacturing methodologies are part of Velocys’ IP.
If one of the suppliers was unable to execute the process,
or deliver certain orders in a timely way, supply could be
transferred to another vendor.
Velocys provides competitive compensation to attract and
retain staff.
The Company chose to locate its engineering and
commercial teams in Houston, and so is well placed to
access a large pool of oil and gas industry expertise.
Velocys does all it can to retain its talented staff in
all aspects of FT and GTL technology and operations.
Plant operating manuals and training documentation,
plant design and reactor and catalyst builds are all well
documented, which would allow knowledge retention
should employees leave the Company. Any modifications
to manufacturing protocols are added to the archive.
18 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 19
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsRisks and mitigation (continued)
Business influences
2
Risk description and impact
Strategic risks
Commercial offering
Velocys may not be able to create or scale its
integrated offer due, for example, to the inability
to secure the key commercial partnerships or to
successfully manage multiple partnerships in parallel.
The reference plant does not continue to operate
As Velocys is a minority partner in ENVIA the Company
is reliant on the other partners and their continued
involvement in the continued operation of the plant.
If they should choose to discontinue the operation
of the ENVIA plant this would limit the amount of
operating data that is available to Velocys.
Market risks
Low oil prices
Oil prices could track the US Energy Information
Administration’s (EIA’s) reference case of an oil price
(of West Texas Intermediate, WTI of $57 in 2018).
Business
influences
Risk management strategy
Velocys is actively investing to maintain its competitive
advantage, and to be seen as the natural choice for
companies seeking partners in its field. The Company is
in discussion with a range of potential partners, each of
whom appears to have a clear motivation for involvement
in the integrated offer/market segment. Velocys is
recruiting into its commercial team new members of
staff with relevant skills and experience to enhance its
ability to connect and negotiate with these partners at
the highest level.
The current economic projections show positive cash flow
for the plant, justifying its continued operation. Velocys, as
a shareholder and the provider of loan note funding, has
the ability to influence such a decision. The on-site team
has been building a comprehensive data set on operational
performance from the start-up of each process unit,
including the performance of the FT process.
Velocys’ strategy review in 2016 identified high growth
potential in target markets at current oil prices. These
involve exploiting low cost feedstocks, producing premium
products (including waxes, the price of which is decoupled
from the oil price), and addressing local regulations, e.g.,
related to gas flaring.
Oil prices could track the EIA low oil price case
(WTI $23 in 2018).
At oil prices in the US$20-30 range, the range of economic
projects is smaller, but the same factors apply.
Future of renewable fuels credits
Renewable fuels credits (the Renewable Fuel Standard,
RFS) could be withdrawn at a federal level in the US.
Renewable fuels credits could be withdrawn
in California.
The RFS is important to many States with large agricultural
economies, to energy security, and to jobs. Velocys engages
actively with law makers in Washington and works with
industry bodies to ensure its voice is heard. The other
market on which Velocys is focussing in the near term,
gas-to-wax plants in Canada, indicates attractive
economics and is not reliant on renewable fuels credits.
Withdrawal of the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) is
unlikely; California is proposing to expand this programme.
Carbon pricing is stable in California and the State
is considering extension of the mandate for carbon
reductions. Velocys engages actively with California
regulators, through industry groups, to ensure its
voice is heard.
Risk description and impact
Market risks (continued)
Competing technology
Existing technologies that are economically-competitive
with Velocys technology in specific niche applications
could be fully commercialised. Competing technologies
are indeed approaching commercialisation. However, the
Company believes that the market is large enough so
that there is room for multiple suppliers.
New technologies could be developed that compete
with Velocys’ technology. The time required to take
newly-developed technology at the lab scale and move
it through pilot, demonstration scale, and then first
commercial reference plant is generally in excess of
10 years.
Brexit
There is uncertainty around the impact of the UK leaving
the European Union.
1. Technical expertise
2. Commercial growth
3. Development of an integrated offer
4. Focus markets
Business
influences
Risk management strategy
Velocys continues to invest in R&D, to improve catalyst
productivity and the efficiency of the reactor system. In
2016 it invested over £10 million in its R&D programmes
(including associated staff costs).
Velocys continues to invest significant effort into
comprehensive plant integration optimisation, with the aim
of significant reductions in cost on a per barrel basis. Such
advances take time to develop and provide Velocys with a
significant competitive advantage beyond its core Fischer-
Tropsch technology capability.
Optimisation of the current generation of plant technology
is being carried out by Velocys and the Company continues
to invest in new technology and technology evaluation.
For example, the Company is working with a technology
licensor to jointly develop an integrated GTL solution
suitable to reduce the flaring of associated gas offshore.
Velocys does not expect to have significant exposure
to the European market in the short and medium terms.
The main impact is likely to be felt through fluctuations
in exchange rates.
Financial risks
The potentially material financial risks associated with a multinational business, including foreign exchange are presented below.
All other financial risks assessed by the Company are included in note 28.
Financing
The Company’s cash usage is significant versus
prospective future cashflows (particularly in the short
term) and Velocys is reliant on the support of a small
group of major shareholders. The timing of cashflows is
difficult to predict given the Company’s nascent strategy.
Project finance may not be secured for plants using
Velocys’ technology.
Exchange rates
As the Company operates in multiple currencies, it may
be impacted by fluctuations in exchange rates.
The Board recognises that further funding will be needed.
Note 2 discusses uncertainties surrounding the extent
and composition of future funding. The Company believes
that equity remains the preferred structure to support
the business as a going concern in the near term, but will
keep this under review. The recently announced fundraise
included the issue of loan notes that are convertible into
equity. As such, in management’s view, they have the
key characteristics of equity. Velocys continues to take
measures to preserve cash in order to protect against
unforeseen events.
The Company is actively engaging with banks and financial
advisers with high levels of expertise in project financing
to support the financing plans for the types of projects it
is developing.
Based on cashflow forecasts the required currency
mix is identified and foreign exchange contracts taken
out accordingly. A number of brokers are used to give
a balanced market view. Financial risks are expanded
upon in note 28.
20 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 21
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsPierre Jungels, CBE
Chairman
Velocys has the long-term
ambition to grow significantly,
and to develop into an
established multinational
business. We need to have the
right governance and reward
culture that supports and
nurtures that development,
and a capability that enables
us to stay one step ahead of
the growth curve.”
Corporate
governance
report
Velocys Board
Chairman: Pierre Jungels
Audit & Risk Committee
Remuneration Committee
Nominations Committee
Chair: Mark Chatterji*
Chair: Sandy Shaw
Chair: Pierre Jungels
Under its revised terms of reference,
the Audit & Risk Committee meets
at least four times a year. Among its
duties it reviews the Company’s audit
planning, risk management systems
and processes and effectiveness of
internal controls, accounting policies
and financial reporting, provides
a forum through which the external
auditors report, and reviews and
monitors their independence and
the provision of additional services.
At least once a year it meets with the
external auditors without Executive
Directors present.
Read more on risk
management on page 27
*Resigned 25 April 2017.
This committee reviews, inter-
alia, the performance of Executive
Directors and sets the scale and
structure of their remuneration
and the basis of their service
agreements, having due regard
to the interests of shareholders.
The committee also determines
the allocation of share options to
Executive Directors. No director has
a service agreement exceeding one
year. Under its terms of reference, no
director is permitted to participate
in decisions concerning his or her
own remuneration.
Read the Directors’
remuneration report on pages
30
33
The committee meets at least twice a
year, and among its duties it reviews
the composition of the Board and
its succession planning, the Board
evaluation process and the findings
from recent evaluations, director
performance and recommendations
for re-elections at the AGM,
and considerations of director
independence under the Code.
Introduction
Companies whose securities are traded
on the AIM market of The London Stock
Exchange are not required to comply with
the principles and provisions of the UK
Corporate Governance Code 2016 (“Code”).
However, the Board has determined that
Velocys should maintain high standards
of corporate governance and, whilst not
complying fully with the Code including the
full disclosure requirements, has taken
steps to adopt the underlying principles of
the Code in so far as the Board considers
these to be appropriate given the size of
the Company and the nature of its current
operations. The information required under
Disclosure Guidance and Transparency
Rule 7.2.6 is included in this report.
Board of directors
Independence
Pierre Jungels has served more than three
consecutive three year terms of office.
However, the Board considers that he
makes a significant contribution to the
Company and that he has retained his
independence of character and judgement
notwithstanding his long-term relationship
with the Company.
The Board regards each of the other
Non-Executive Directors as being fully
independent. In accordance with Code
Provision B.7.1, resolutions will be proposed
at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting
for the re-appointment of all directors.
Avoidance of conflicts of interest
The Company has a procedure for the
disclosure, review, authorisation and
management of directors’ conflicts of
interest and potential conflicts of interest
in accordance with the provisions of the
Company’s Act 2006. In deciding whether
to authorise a conflict or potential conflict,
the directors must have regard to their
general duties under the Companies Act
2006. The authorisation of any conflict
matter, and the terms of authorisation are
subject to determination by the Board and
regularly reviewed.
The Board and its committees
The Board is responsible to shareholders
for setting the Company’s strategy and
overseeing its execution, and for the overall
management, control and performance of
the Velocys business. It delegates certain
responsibilities to designated committees,
as set out above. The committees’ terms of
reference are reviewed annually against
regulatory requirements and current best
practice. Information on the work of the
three Board committees is set out above.
The Corporate governance
report continues on page
26
Division of responsibility
The roles of the Chairman and the Chief
Executive are separated, with clear
written guidance to support the division
of responsibilities. The Chairman is
principally responsible for leadership
and effectiveness of the Board, setting
the Board agenda, ensuring adequacy
of information flow to the Board and
adequacy of consideration of strategic
issues, and promoting a culture of
openness of debate at Board level
and between directors and the senior
management team. The Chief Executive is
primarily responsible for the management
of the business and implementation of
the Company’s strategy and policies;
maintaining a close working relationship
with the Chairman; and leading the senior
management team.
Since January 2015, Julian West has acted
as Senior Independent Director, providing
a strong and skilled sounding board for the
Chairman and serving as an intermediary
for the other directors as necessary. In
addition, he is available to shareholders to
air concerns that have not been addressed
through other formal channels.
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
r
e
p
o
r
t
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
22 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 23
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 23
Our Board of directors
The Board includes individuals with a deep knowledge of oil
and gas markets and industry contacts at the highest level.
Chairman & Executive Board
N
Name Dr Pierre Jungels, CBE
Role Chairman
Skills and experience
Pierre is an oil industry veteran, with over
30 years’ experience – 12 of which were spent
at main board level, including appointments
as Chairman of Rockhopper Exploration plc,
Chief Executive of Enterprise Oil plc, Executive
Director of PetroFina, and Managing Director
of British Gas. He also currently holds a non-
executive directorship at Baker Hughes Inc.
Pierre is a certified engineer and has a PhD in
geophysics and hydraulics from the California
Institute of Technology. He was twice President
of the Institute of Petroleum.
Name David Pummell
Role Chief Executive Officer
Skills and experience
With over 30 years of energy and oil industry
experience, David joined Velocys from ACAL
Energy Ltd, a private equity backed fuel cell
technology company, where he was CEO.
Prior to this, David was CEO of MAPS Technology
Ltd, where he successfully commercialised
the technology leading to its subsequent
acquisition by GE, before becoming CEO of
Ceres Power Group plc, a developer of fuel cell
micro combined heat and power (CHP) products.
He began his career at BP as a chemical engineer
before going on to hold a number of executive
positions across the downstream business,
including petrochemical manufacturing,
supply chain, new business start-ups and
a number of senior business and functional
management roles during his 22-year tenure.
Name Susan Robertson
Role Chief Financial Officer
Skills and experience
Susan came to Velocys from the BOC Group
where she had held various senior-level financial
management and business development
positions since 1990. Susan helped to set up and
then, from 2003 to 2006, served as Vice President
and CFO of Japan Air Gases (JAG), a joint venture
between BOC Group and Air Liquide. Prior to
taking up her position with JAG, she held finance
positions with BOC in Japan, the UK and globally,
as well as strategic and business development
roles in the UK. Susan has an honours degree
in economics from Cambridge University and is
a chartered accountant (FCA) having originally
trained with Arthur Andersen in London.
Name Dr Paul F. Schubert
Role Chief Operating Officer
Skills and experience
Paul has 35 years of experience in the
petrochemical and natural gas industry. He has
held various technical and general management
roles with SGS Group, Syntroleum, Catalytica,
Phillips Petroleum, and Engelhard. In these
positions he was responsible for day-to-
day operations, process development and
commercialisation, plant design, and asset
integrity management.
Paul is the inventor or co-inventor of 16 US
patents and is the author of over 40 publications.
He holds a PhD in Inorganic Chemistry from the
University of Illinois, and a BS in Chemistry from
the University of Arkansas.
Non-Executive Board
Committee key
R
N
Audit and Risk Committee
Remuneration Committee
Nominations Committee
Chairman of Committee
Sector experience
Oil, gas and petrochemicals
Banking and finance
Energy
Engineering
Chemicals
A
R
N
R
N
A
R
N
Name Julian West
Role Senior Independent Director
Skills and experience
Julian brings over forty years’ experience of
energy policy, in both the private and public
sectors, and has broad expertise in international
politics, privatisation, energy economics, and
regulation of energy companies. Until 2008,
he was a Senior Director at Cambridge Energy
Research Associates (CERA), leading the firm's
oil teams. Before joining CERA in 1996, Julian
was an executive and main Board Director at
Enterprise Oil plc, where he was responsible
for the company's planning and business
development. Previously, at the UK Department
of Energy (1974-83), he focused on oil and
energy policy and financial control and, under
different administrations, served as Principal
Private Secretary to a Minister of State and
three Secretaries of State.
Name Sandy Shaw
Role Non-Executive Director
Skills and experience
Sandy has nearly 40 years of experience in
the oil and gas industry. From 2008 until its
take-over in 2013 Sandy was an Executive
Director Corporate & Commercial, and Company
Secretary of Valiant Petroleum PLC, a company
of which she was a founder and initially
a Non-Executive Director. She has held senior
executive positions as group legal counsel and/
or commercial director for numerous companies
including Consort Resources, LASMO PLC
(where she was also inter alia President of
LASMO USA), Esso Petroleum, Marathon Oil
and Mobil. Sandy has extensive oil and gas M&A
experience, has overseen numerous material
private equity subscriptions and led a £200m
trade sale through to final negotiations. She has
worked as a consultant to several oil and gas
companies, as well as two UK law firms.
Name Ross Allonby
Role Non-Executive Director
Skills and experience
Ross brings considerable experience in the
banking and finance sector to Velocys. He is
a Founder, Managing Partner and CEO/CIO of
First River Capital Partners LLP, an integrated
advisory, origination, structuring and investment
management business providing companies in
emerging markets with debt financing solutions.
He was formerly Head of Emerging Markets
(EM) Credit Trading at Bank of America Merrill
Lynch, responsible for EM direct lending, loans,
structured credit trading, EM special situations,
EM distressed/high yield and EM flow trading.
Prior to joining Merrill Lynch, he was a Director
in the Capital Markets Group of Standard
Bank, London, and had previously been a VP
at Goldman Sachs.
24 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 25
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsCorporate governance (continued)
The Corporate governance
report continues from page
23
The Board and its committees (continued)
Meetings
The Board meets formally at least six
times a year to set the overall direction
and strategy of the Company, to review
operating and financial performance and to
consider and advise on senior management
appointments. The Board also monitors
and approves financial policy and budgets,
including capital expenditure.
Directors receive briefing papers in
advance of meetings – a consolidated
CEO’s report encompassing all areas
of the business, including health and
safety information, status updates
on project development and special
projects, competitor activity and key
issues facing the Company; and a CFO’s
report, which sets out performance
against budget during the period since
the previous meeting. Open dialogue is
encouraged and all directors have the
opportunity to challenge and seek further
information or clarification as appropriate.
All key operational decisions are subject
to Board approval.
In addition to the scheduled Board
meetings detailed above, a further three
meetings in 2016, which were held at
short notice to consider specific matters,
were attended by all directors, apart from
Ross Allonby who was unable to attend
one meeting.
Reports by committee
The minutes of the Audit & Risk,
Remuneration and Nomination Committees
are circulated to the Board. The committee
chairs also report to the Board on the
outcome of committee meetings at the
subsequent Board meeting.
Performance evaluation
This year’s evaluation of the Board, its
committees and individual directors
has been carried out by the Company
Secretary, taking the form of individual
interviews with each director, and
comprehensive questionnaires, which
provided all directors with an opportunity
to comment on Board and committee
procedures. A performance evaluation of
the Chairman has been carried out, led by
the Senior Independent Director, and taking
into account the views of all directors.
As in the previous year, the results of the
evaluation are being considered by the
Board and each committee in open session
and, where appropriate, actions arising
from such reviews will be implemented
and monitored.
Attendance at scheduled Board and committee meetings
Board
Audit & Risk
Committee
Remuneration
Committee
Nominations
Committee
Number of meetings
held in 2016
Attendance* by:
Pierre Jungels
Ross Allonby
Mark Chatterji
David Pummell
Susan Robertson
Paul Schubert
Sandy Shaw
Julian West
Jan Verloop
7
100%
86%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
5
–
100%
100%
–
–
–
–
100%
–
4
–
75%
–
–
–
–
100%
100%
–
4
100%
75%
100%
–
–
–
100%
100%
100%
* The attendance percentage relates only to applicable meetings. Jan Verloop resigned from the Board in
September 2016.
Re-election
The Company’s Articles of Association
provide that directors are subject to
election by shareholders at the first
opportunity after their appointment,
and that one third of directors are subject
to retirement by rotation at each Annual
General Meeting. At the 2017 meeting,
all directors will once again stand for
re-election, continuing the practice
introduced in 2016.
Company Secretary
The Company Secretary, through the
Chairman, is responsible for advising
the Board on governance matters,
and for ensuring that Board procedures
are followed and that applicable
rules and regulations are complied
with. All directors have access to the
advice and services of the Company
Secretary. An agreed procedure exists
for directors in the furtherance of their
duties to take independent professional
advice. During 2016, no director sought
independent legal advice pursuant to
the policy.
Relations with shareholders
The Board considers effective
communication with shareholders to be
very important, and encourages regular
dialogue with investors. Directors regularly
attend meetings with shareholders and
analysts throughout the year, and the
Board responds promptly to questions
received. Shareholders will be given
at least 21 days’ notice of the Annual
General Meeting, at which they will have
the opportunity to discuss the Company’s
developments and performance.
The Company’s website www.velocys.com
contains full details of the Company’s
business activities, as well as press
releases and other details. It links to the
London Stock Exchange website for share
price details, share trading activities and
graphs, as well as Regulatory News Service
(RNS) announcements.
Maintenance of a system of internal
controls
The directors have overall responsibility
for ensuring that the Company maintains
a system of internal control to provide
them with reasonable assurance that the
assets of the Company are safeguarded
and that shareholders’ investments are
protected. The system includes internal
controls appropriate for a Company of
the size of Velocys, and covers financial,
operational, compliance (including health
and safety) and risk management. Such
systems are designed to manage, rather
than eliminate, the risk of failure to
achieve business objectives; any system
can provide only reasonable, and not
absolute, assurance against material
misstatement or loss. The process in
place for reviewing Velocys’ systems of
internal control includes procedures
designed to identify and evaluate failings
and weaknesses, and, in the case of any
categorised as significant, procedures exist
to ensure that necessary action is taken to
remedy the failings.
The Board has considered its policies with
regard to internal controls as set out in
the Code and undertakes assessments
of the major areas of the business and
methods used to monitor and control them.
In addition to financial risk, the review
covers operational, commercial, regulatory
and health and safety risks. The risk review
is an ongoing process with reviews being
undertaken on a regular basis.
The key procedures designed to provide
an effective system of internal controls
that are operating up to the date of
sign-off of this report are set out below.
Control environment
There is an organisational structure with
clearly defined lines of responsibility and
delegation of accountability and authority.
Risk management
The Company employs directors and senior
personnel with the appropriate knowledge
and experience for a business engaged
in activities in its field of operations, and
undertakes regular risk assessments
and reviews of its activities. During 2016
the committee had two members,
Mark Chatterji and Ross Allonby, who have
recent and relevant financial experience.
The committee keeps under annual
review whether an internal audit function
should be established. Although this is not
considered necessary at the present time
given the size of the Company, this decision
will be reviewed as the operations of the
Company develop.
In its approach to risk management the
committee considers the complexity of
the transaction of building GTL plants,
which involves a large number of possible
stakeholders – asset holder, project
developer, EPC, financing party(ies),
technology licensors and offtake partners.
The risks associated with each of these
parties, and the relationship that Velocys
has with each one, are analysed to identify
areas of potential risk. Additionally the
committee considers risks that are beyond
the Company’s control, but against which
it can take mitigating action. These include
market risk and risk from competitors.
The Audit & Risk Committee reviews all of
the Company’s principal risk management
policies and the ongoing development of a
Company risk register.
Details of risks to the business that the
Board considers to be potentially material
are set out in the Strategic report on pages
18 to 21 and note 28. The risks posed by
the UK Brexit vote and the US presidential
election have been considered in the
risk assessment process and, where
appropriate, their impacts reflected in
other relevant risks, rather than being
presented as a standalone risk.
The risks presented are the principal risks
that the Company believes it currently
faces. However, additional risks, of
which the Company is aware, or risks
the Company currently considers to be
less significant, could have a material
adverse impact. The risks included are
not presented in order of priority.
Financial information
The Company prepares detailed budget
and working capital projections,
which are approved annually by the Board
and are maintained and updated regularly
throughout the year. Detailed management
accounts and working capital cash flows are
prepared on a monthly basis and compared
to budgets and projections to identify any
significant variances.
The Audit & Risk Committee has considered
the integrity of the Company’s 2016
financial statements and reviewed the
appropriateness of its critical accounting
policies and the judgements made in
applying them. The year-end financial
statements were reviewed and discussed
with PwC. In addition, the interim financial
statements were reviewed by the
committee. The committee considered,
among others, the following specific
matters:
Carrying value of Goodwill and other
Intangible assets; and investment
in subsidiaries.
Going concern.
Accounting for ENVIA as an associate.
Audit review
The Audit & Risk Committee has discussed
PwC’s audit process, and the findings from
the audit of the 2015 financial year were
reviewed, along with feedback from the CFO
on the effectiveness of the external audit
process. The committee reviewed the quality
and cost effectiveness of the external audit,
and the independence and objectivity of
the auditors. It obtained confirmation from
PwC that their independence and ethics
policies complied with FRC requirements,
and that they remain independent and
maintain internal safeguards to ensure
their objectivity. No contractual obligations
exist that restrict the Company’s choice
of external auditor and the committee
is satisfied that the external auditor
remains independent.
The committee has established policies
determining the non-audit services that
the external auditors can provide and
the procedures required for approval of
any such engagement. Further details of
fees paid to PwC for both audit and non-
audit work can be found in note 11 to the
financial statements.
Management of liquid resources
The Board is risk averse when investing the
Company’s surplus cash. The Company’s
treasury management policy is reviewed
periodically, and sets out strict procedures
and limits on how surplus funds
are invested.
Review of corporate governance
disclosures
The Board has voluntarily complied with
those key principles of the Code in so far as
they are considered appropriate given the
size of the Company and the nature of its
operations. These have not been formally
reviewed by the Company’s auditors.
The auditors’ responsibility extends only to
reading this report as a part of the Annual
report and accounts and considering
whether it is materially consistent with
the audited financial statements.
26 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 27
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsDirectors’ report
The directors present their report and the audited consolidated
financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2016
Company
Velocys plc is the parent of the Company. It is a public limited company incorporated and registered in England and Wales. The registered
office address is given on the information page inside the back cover of this document.
Directors’ qualifying third-party indemnity provision
The Company maintains directors’ qualifying third-party indemnity insurance to provide cover for legal action against its directors.
This has been in place throughout the year and remains in place at the date of this report.
Future developments
The Board aims to pursue its corporate strategies as detailed in the Strategic report on pages 1 to 21.
Dividends
The Directors do not recommend any dividend for the year ended 31 December 2016 (2015: nil).
Research and development
The Company’s R&D activity will extend to joint development programmes with technology partners (such as TRI). Details of R&D expense
and capitalised R&D are in notes 10 and 17.
Donations
The Company made no political donations during 2016.
Post-balance sheet events
Additional funding by the Company to ENVIA Energy, which was announced in February 2016, is described in the Strategic report on page 17,
and in note 20 along with other post-balance sheet events.
Directors
The directors of Velocys plc as at 31 December 2016, who served throughout the year and up to the date of approval of the financial
statements, unless otherwise stated, were as follows.
Pierre Jungels (Non-Executive Chairman)
David Pummell (Chief Executive Officer) – appointed 6 January 2017
Susan Robertson (Chief Financial Officer)
Paul Schubert (Chief Operating Officer)
Julian West (Senior Independent Director)
Jan Verloop (Non-Executive Director) – resigned 21 September 2016
Sandy Shaw (Non-Executive Director)
Mark Chatterji (Non-Executive Director) – resigned 25 April 2017
Ross Allonby (Non-Executive Director)
Whilst the Company’s Articles of Association require that all directors are subject to election by shareholders at the first opportunity after
their appointment, and to re-election thereafter at intervals of not more than three years, the directors have decided that, in line with best
corporate governance practice, at the 2017 Annual General Meeting all of the directors will again retire and offer themselves for re-election,
as they did in 2016.
Directors’ interests
The directors who held office at 31 December 2016 had the following interests in the shares of parent company undertakings (as recorded
in the Register of Directors’ Interests and including those of the spouse or civil partner and children under 18).
Financial instruments
The Company’s financial instruments are detailed in note 28. Financial risks, and exposure and risk management policies and objectives
are detailed in the Strategic report on page 21, and in note 28.
Substantial shareholdings
The Company was notified of the following holdings of 3% or more of the issued share capital of Velocys plc as at 1 May 2017.
Ervington Investments Limited
Lansdowne Partners
Invesco Asset Management
Henderson Global Investors
Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management
Number of
shares held
42,442,443
26,631,808
23,600,000
17,593,137
5,472,676
Percentage
of issued
share capital
29.48%
18.50%
16.39%
12.22%
3.80%
Greenhouse gas emissions
Details of the Company’s greenhouse gas emissions are included in the Strategic report on page 17.
Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at Milton Park Innovation Centre, 99 Park Drive, Milton Park,
Oxfordshire OX14 4RY on Thursday 22 June 2017.
Auditors and disclosure of information to auditors
Each of the persons who is a director at the date of approval of this report confirms that:
So far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditors are unaware.
The Director has taken all the steps that he / she ought to have taken as a director in order to make himself / herself aware of any
relevant audit information and to establish that the Company’s auditors are aware of that information.
This confirmation is given and should be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of s418 of the Companies Act 2006.
Corporate governance
The Company’s statement on corporate governance is available on pages 22 to 27.
Approved by the Board and signed on its behalf by:
Susan Robertson
Pierre Jungels
Julian West
Sandy Shaw
David Pummell
Paul Schubert
Mark Chatterji
Ross Allonby
Directors’ share options and service contracts are detailed in the Directors’ remuneration report.
Velocys plc Ordinary shares
31 December
2016
31 December
2015
304,874
223,031
75,000
17,758
–
–
–
–
304,874
223,031
75,000
17,758
–
–
–
–
David Pummell
Chief Executive Officer
15 May 2017
28 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 29
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Directors’ remuneration report
Introduction
The Remuneration Committee is resolute in maintaining high standards of corporate governance and has taken steps to comply with
the principles of best practice in so far as it can be applied practically given the size of the Company. The Company is listed on AIM and is
therefore not required to comply with the following regulations: disclosure requirements of the Directors’ Remuneration Report Regulations
2013; the UKLA Listing Rules; the disclosure provisions under schedule 8 to SI 2008/410 of the large and medium-sized companies and
groups (accounts and reports) regulations 2008. Consequently, certain disclosures contained in these regulations are not included below.
Unaudited information
Remuneration Committee
The following served as members of the Committee throughout the year ended 31 December 2016.
Sandy Shaw (Chair)
Julian West
Ross Allonby
The Committee’s constitution and operation is compliant with the provisions of the Code on Corporate Governance. In determining
remuneration policy for Executive Directors, the Committee takes into consideration both the Code and the guidelines published
by The Investment Association (formerly the Association of British Insurers).
Remuneration policy for Executive Directors
The remuneration policy has been designed to ensure that Executive Directors receive incentives and rewards appropriate to their
performance, responsibility and experience. In making its assessment, the Remuneration Committee seeks to align the policy with
the interests of the shareholders.
Key features of the policy are:
Setting salaries to be competitive relative to the experience of the individual and the nature, complexity and responsibilities of their
work in order to attract and retain management of the required quality.
Linking individual remuneration packages to the Company’s performance through bonus schemes and long-term share-based plans.
Providing employment and post-retirement benefits in accordance with standard policies of the Company.
The following chart illustrates the proportion of fixed and variable elements in the remuneration package, assuming target and stretch
performance is achieved.
Maximum
Target
Minimum
Base
Bonus
LTIP
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
As % of base salary
30 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Remuneration of Executive Directors
Executive Directors’ remuneration is considered annually. In addition, the Remuneration Committee undertakes periodically
a comprehensive review using external advisors. At the start of 2016, the arrival of the new CEO necessitated a review of the overall
remuneration package for the Executive Directors. Current remuneration is based on the following principles.
Base salary
The base salary is reviewed annually at the beginning of each year. The review process undertaken by the Remuneration Committee
considers the ongoing development of the Company, the contribution of the individual, the need to retain and motivate employees,
and benchmark remuneration information from comparable organisations.
Annual performance incentive
All Executive Directors are eligible, at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee, for an annual bonus. The target bonus award for each
individual is based on a percentage of base salary, which, for the year commencing 1 January 2016, was 75%. The maximum award for
stretch target performance is twice the target amount. The Remuneration Committee sets performance targets for bonus awards at the
beginning of each year. Awards are determined by both the performance of the individual and the Company as a whole at the end of each
year. The performance targets for the Company comprise measures of financial, technical and business development goals. For 2016,
the Remuneration Committee decided that no bonus would be awarded.
Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
The committee believes that the LTIP scheme should provide to Executive Directors appropriate incentivisation, focus and reward for
achievement, that is aligned with shareholder interests, and that includes relevant, demanding performance targets. The last LTIP scheme
that the Company put in place was in 2014 and, due to the change in CEO and the intention to review the Company strategy, the committee
decided not to make an award under this scheme during 2016. Instead, the committee intends to introduce a new equity-based incentive
scheme in 2017. It may, in the allocation of such awards, take into consideration the fact that no 2016 awards were made.
Pensions and other benefits
The Company contributes to individuals’ defined contribution pension plans in line with the Company-wide schemes in place.
For UK-based employees, the Company contributions are 7% of base salary. For US-based employees, the contributions are 3%
of pensionable pay (which includes bonus) up to the maximum allowable under US pensions law.
Other benefits provided are life insurance, private medical insurance and relocation allowances where applicable, in line with the
Company’s standard policies.
Directors’ service contracts
Each of the Executive Directors has a service contract with a notice period of six months.
Remuneration policy for Non-Executive Directors
The remuneration of Non-Executive Directors is determined by the executive members of the Board in consultation with the Chairman,
based on a benchmark review of current practices in similar companies. The Non-Executive Directors are paid a fixed fee and do not
receive any pension payments, bonus or other benefits.
Non-Executive Directors are appointed for an initial three-year term and are typically expected to serve for two three-year terms.
Either the Non-Executive Director or the Company can terminate the contract with three months’ written notice; the Chairman’s notice
period is also three months. The Company may invite a Non-Executive Director to serve for further periods after the expiry of two three-
year terms subject to a particularly rigorous review of performance, and taking into account the need for progressive refreshing of the
Board. Under the Company’s Articles of Association, all directors are required to stand for re-election by shareholders on appointment
and thereafter at least once every three years. However, in line with best practice, the Company decided in 2016 to put all Non-Executive
Directors up for re-election at its Annual General Meeting (AGM) and intends to do the same at the 2017 AGM.
Proposed ratification of breach of Article 92
During the three financial years ended 31 December 2016, fees were paid to the Chairman and other Non-Executive Directors in excess
of the aggregate limit of £250,000 specified in Article 92 of the Articles adopted on 22 June 2011. This amount was set at the formation
of the Company in 2006 and although the Articles allow this amount to be amended by ordinary resolution, and despite the growth of the
Company since this point, no subsequent amendment has been made. The aggregate amount of these fees, as set out in the Company’s
Annual report and accounts for the years ended 31 December 2016 and 2015 is as follows.
Aggregate fees paid to Chairman and Non-Executive Directors
2016
£
2015
£
268,500
271,853
At the Board meeting in September 2016, in light of the breach of Article 92, the Non-Executive Directors voluntarily agreed that they
would each accept a cut in fees to reduce the annual cost of fees to within the limit of £250,000. In addition, a resolution will be proposed
at the 2017 AGM to approve and ratify any payments to the Chairman and other Non-Executive Directors out of the funds of the Company
by way of fees for their services in excess of the amount specified in Article 92 of the Articles as though the directors had been authorised
pursuant to Article 92 of the Articles to make payments of such amounts.
Further information is set out in the Notice of Annual General Meeting, which is being published together with this Annual report
and accounts.
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 31
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Directors’ remuneration report (continued)
Audited information
Directors’ remuneration
Aggregate emoluments for current and former directors in 2016 totalled £1,085,137 (2015: £1,645,154), and Company pension contributions
were £41,760 (2015: £31,734).
The directors who held office at 31 December 2016 received the following remuneration in relation to the year ended 31 December 2016.
Name of director
Executive
David Pummell
Susan Robertson
Paul Schubert
Non-Executive
Pierre Jungels
Julian West
Mark Chatterji
Ross Allonby
Sandy Shaw
Salary and
fees1
£
Other
benefits2
£
2016
Total
£
2016
Pension
£
2015
Total
£
2015
Pension
£
261,263
218,000
238,778
78,000
43,875
43,875
43,875
43,875
27,332
770
28,237
–
–
23,076
–
–
288,595
218,770
267,015
78,000
43,875
66,951
43,875
43,875
18,550
15,260
7,950
–
–
–
–
–
–
377,878
330,757
80,000
45,000
12,188
3,750
45,000
–
15,071
5,201
–
–
–
–
–
Aggregate emoluments and pension contributions
971,541
79,415
1,050,956
41,760
894,573
20,272
1
All salaries and fees are denominated in pounds sterling except for that of Paul Schubert, who is based in the US and paid in dollars. His remuneration has been
converted from dollars to pounds at the exchange rate on the date of recognition of the cost. The average rate used for translation of his 2016 salary was £1= $1.36
compared to £1= $1.53 in 2015.
2 Other benefits include medical cover for Executive Directors and, in the case David Pummell, a joining allowance in lieu of car allowance. In the case of Paul Schubert,
benefits include costs related to his relocation to Houston. In the case of Mark Chatterji, who is located in the US, other benefits include the cost of his travel from the
US to the UK for Board meetings along with associated expenses that are paid by the Company.
Directors’ share options
Aggregate emoluments disclosed above include amounts paid through the employee benefit trust (EBT) in relation to share options
exercised. In 2016 no payments were made to serving directors (2015: none) and a payment of £13,300 was made in respect of an
exercise by the former CEO under his 2015 settlement agreement.
Details of all directors’ shareholdings are disclosed on page 28 in the Directors’ report.
Details of options held by the directors at 31 December 2016 are as follows.
Name of director
Susan Robertson
EMI
Bonus 2008
Bonus 2010
ELTIP 2009
ELTIP 2011
ELTIP 2012
ELTIP 2012
ELTIP 2013
ELTIP 2013
ELTIP 2014
ELTIP 2014
ELTIP 2015
ELTIP 2015
ELTIP 2015
ELTIP 2015
At 31
December
2015
62,893
42,105
37,655
105,000
390,625
365,000
273,803
502,930
125,732
440,316
110,079
56,742
189,139
47,425
158,083
Total
2,907,527
Granted
Exercised
Lapsed
At 31
December
2016
Exercise
price (£)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
62,893
42,105
37,655
105,000
390,625
365,000
273,803
502,930
125,732
440,316
110,079
56,742
189,139
47,425
158,083
2,907,527
1.59
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.49
0.49
1.59
1.59
1.64
1.64
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Earliest
date of
exercise
29/10/10
31/03/09
20/03/11
31/01/12
20/09/11
01/01/15
01/01/12
01/01/16
12/04/13
01/01/17
01/04/14
01/01/17
01/01/17
01/01/18
01/01/18
Exercisable
at 31
December
2016
Date of
expiry
01/04/18
31/03/19
20/03/21
21/11/19
20/09/21
01/02/22
01/02/22
12/04/23
12/04/23
01/04/24
01/04/24
26/02/25
26/02/25
26/02/25
26/02/25
62,893
42,105
37,655
105,000
390,625
365,000
273,803
502,930
125,732
–
110,079
–
–
–
–
2,015,822
Name of director
Paul Schubert
EMI
ELTIP 2012
ELTIP 2013
ELTIP 2013
ELTIP 2014
ELTIP 2014
ELTIP 2015
ELTIP 2015
ELTIP 2015
ELTIP 2015
At 31
December
2015
207,894
119,000
502,930
41,911
336,711
56,119
43,344
144,482
36,227
120,758
Total
1,609,376
Granted
Exercised
At 31
December
2016
Lapsed
Exercise
price (£)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
207,894
119,000
502,930
41,911
336,711
56,119
43,344
144,482
36,227
120,758
1,609,376
0.92
0.49
1.59
1.59
1.64
1.64
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Earliest
date of
exercise
04/10/14
01/01/15
01/01/16
01/01/15
01/01/17
01/01/15
01/01/17
01/01/17
01/01/18
01/01/18
Exercisable
at 31
December
2016
Date of
expiry
04/10/21
01/02/22
12/04/23
12/04/23
01/04/24
01/04/24
26/02/25
26/02/25
26/02/25
26/02/25
207,894
119,000
502,930
41,911
–
56,119
–
–
–
–
927,854
No options were exercised by acting directors during 2016. The total charge for share-based payments during the year in respect of
directors was £357,000.
Shareholding requirements
The Company has not previously had in place guidelines covering shareholdings of Executive Directors. It is intended that the new
equity-based incentive scheme, to be introduced in 2017, will include such guidelines designed to ensure that Executive Directors
retain an interest in the Company.
Former directors
Jan Verloop, who was a member of the Board at 1 January 2016 and resigned during the year, received the following remuneration.
Name of director
Jan Verloop
Salary
and fees
£
34,181
Other
benefits
£
2016
Total
£
2016
pension
£
2015
Total
£
2015
pension
£
–
34,181
–
44,666
–
Share price
The market price of the parent company’s shares as at 31 December 2016 was 37p (2015: 42p) and the range during the year was 25p to
44p (2015: 34p to 169p). Details of options and the cost of share-based payments are given in note 15.
32 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 33
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Statement of directors’ responsibilities
in respect of the financial statements
Independent auditors’ report
to the members of Velocys plc
The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law
and regulation.
Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have prepared
the financial statements for the parent company (Velocys plc) and the Company (Velocys plc and its subsidiaries) in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union. Under company law the directors must not approve
the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the parent
company, and of the profit or loss of the Company for that period. In preparing the financial statements, the directors are required to:
Select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently.
State whether applicable IFRSs as adopted by the European Union have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and
explained in the financial statements.
Make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent.
Prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue
in business.
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions
and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and of Velocys plc and enable them to ensure
that the financial statements and the Directors’ remuneration report comply with the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the Company
financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.
The directors are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and of Velocys plc and hence for taking reasonable steps for
the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the
preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
The directors consider that the Annual report and accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the
information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, business model and strategy.
Each of the directors, whose names and functions are listed in the Directors’ report confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:
The financial statements of the Company and of Velocys plc, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the
European Union, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit of the Company.
The Strategic report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company and
parent company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces.
On behalf of the Board
David Pummell
Chief Executive Officer
15 May 2017
Report on the financial statements
Our opinion
In our opinion:
Velocys plc’s consolidated financial statements (“Velocys”) and parent company financial statements (the “financial statements”) give
a true and fair view of the state of Velocys’ and of the parent company’s affairs as at 31 December 2016 and of Velocys’ loss and Velocys’
and the parent company’s cash flows for the year then ended;
Velocys’ financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”)
as adopted by the European Union;
the parent company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union
and as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006; and
the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
Emphasis of matter – Velocys and parent company - going concern
In forming our opinion on Velocys’ financial statements and the parent company financial statements, which is not modified, we have
considered the adequacy of the disclosure made in note 2 to the financial statements concerning Velocys’ and the parent company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. As outlined in note 2 to the financial statements, the directors' forecasts are dependent on key
assumptions in relation to the ENVIA Oklahoma project startup reaching full operational capacity within 2017, the costs of ongoing
development projects, coupled with Velocys reducing certain existing overhead costs, and Velocys raising additional funding by the
second quarter of 2018. These conditions, along with the other matters explained in note 2 to the financial statements, indicate the
existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about Velocys’ and the parent company’s ability to continue as
a going concern. Velocys’ financial statements and the parent company financial statements do not include the adjustments that
would result if Velocys and parent company were unable to continue as a going concern.
What we have audited
The financial statements, included within the Annual report and accounts (the “Annual Report”), comprise:
the Consolidated statement of financial position and Velocys plc statement of financial position as at 31 December 2016;
the Consolidated income statement and Consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year then ended;
the Consolidated statement of cash flows and Velocys plc statement of cash flows for the year then ended;
the Consolidated statement of changes in equity and Velocys plc statement of changes in equity for the year then ended; and
the notes to the financial statements, which include a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Certain required disclosures have been presented elsewhere in the Annual Report, rather than in the notes to the financial statements.
These are cross-referenced from the financial statements and are identified as audited.
The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the financial statements is IFRSs as adopted by the
European Union and, as regards the parent company financial statements, as applied in accordance with the provisions of the
Companies Act 2006, and applicable law.
In applying the financial reporting framework, the directors have made a number of subjective judgements, for example in respect
of significant accounting estimates. In making such estimates, they have made assumptions and considered future events.
Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
the information given in the Strategic report and the Directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial statements are
prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and
the Strategic report and the Directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
In addition, in light of the knowledge and understanding of Velocys, the parent company and their environment obtained in the course
of the audit, we are required to report if we have identified any material misstatements in the Strategic report and the Directors’ report.
We have nothing to report in this respect.
Opinion on additional disclosures
Directors’ remuneration report
The parent company voluntarily prepares a Directors’ remuneration report in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act
2006. The directors have requested that we audit the part of the Directors’ remuneration report specified by the Companies Act 2006 to
be audited as if the parent company were a quoted company.
In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies
Act 2006.
Other matters on which we are required to report by exception
Adequacy of accounting records and information and explanations received
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or
adequate accounting records have not been kept by the parent company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received
from branches not visited by us; or
the parent company financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns.
34 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 35
We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsIndependent auditors’ report (continued)
to the members of Velocys plc
Consolidated income statement
for the year ended 31 December 2016
2016
£’000
2016
£’000
2016
£’000
2015
£’000
2015
£’000
2015
£’000
Before Exceptional
items
(note 4)
exceptional
items
Before Exceptional
items
(note 4)
exceptional
items
2,002
(1,275)
727
(25,483)
2,009
–
–
–
(1,204)
1,763
Total
1,445
(1,060)
385
(20,238)
2,768
Total
2,002
(1,275)
727
(26,687)
3,772
–
–
–
(2,809)
2,496
(313)
(17,085)
(22,747)
559
(22,188)
–
(313)
–
–
–
(313)
–
(306)
(17,391)
3,344
(26)
–
(22,747)
1,155
(53)
3,318
1,102
(14,073)
1,404
(21,645)
1,035
–
559
–
–
–
559
–
–
(22,188)
1,155
(53)
1,102
(21,086)
1,035
1,445
(1,060)
385
(17,429)
272
(16,722)
(306)
(17,078)
3,344
(26)
3,318
(13,760)
1,404
(12,356)
(313)
(12,669)
(20,610)
559
(20,051)
Note
6
9
10
20
7
8
13
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Administrative expenses
Other income
Operating (loss) income
Share of loss of investments accounted for
using the equity method
(Loss) income before finance income
Finance income
Finance costs
Finance income, net
(Loss) income before income tax
Income tax credit
(Loss) income for the financial year attributable
to the owners of Velocys plc
Loss per share attributable
to the owners of Velocys plc
Basic and diluted loss per share (pence)
16
(8.62)
(8.84)
(14.52)
(14.13)
The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.
Directors’ remuneration
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion, certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified
by law are not made. We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.
Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit
Our responsibilities and those of the directors
As explained more fully in the Statement of directors' responsibilities set out on page 34, the directors are responsible for the preparation
of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view.
Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International
Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) (“ISAs (UK & Ireland)”). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board’s
Ethical Standards for Auditors.
This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the parent company’s members as a body in accordance with
Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume
responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where
expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.
What an audit of financial statements involves
We conducted our audit in accordance with ISAs (UK & Ireland). An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement,
whether caused by fraud or error. This includes an assessment of:
whether the accounting policies are appropriate to Velocys’ and the parent company’s circumstances and have been consistently applied
and adequately disclosed;
the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors; and
the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We primarily focus our work in these areas by assessing the directors’ judgements against available evidence, forming our own
judgements, and evaluating the disclosures in the financial statements.
We test and examine information, using sampling and other auditing techniques, to the extent we consider necessary to provide
a reasonable basis for us to draw conclusions. We obtain audit evidence through testing the effectiveness of controls, substantive
procedures or a combination of both.
In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information in the Annual Report to identify material inconsistencies with the
audited financial statements and to identify any information that is apparently materially incorrect based on, or materially inconsistent
with, the knowledge acquired by us in the course of performing the audit. If we become aware of any apparent material misstatements or
inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report. With respect to the Strategic report and Directors’ report, we consider whether
those reports include the disclosures required by applicable legal requirements.
Sam Taylor (Senior Statutory Auditor)
for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors
Reading
15 May 2017
36 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 37
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
for the year ended 31 December 2016
Consolidated statement of financial position
as at 31 December 2016
(Loss) income for the year
Other comprehensive income
Items that may be reclassified subsequently
to profit or loss if certain conditions are met
Foreign currency translation differences
Total comprehensive (expense) income for the year
2016
£’000
2016
£’000
2016
£’000
2015
£’000
2015
£’000
2015
£’000
Before Exceptional
exceptional
items
items
(note 4)
Before Exceptional
items
(note 4)
exceptional
items
Total
Total
(12,356)
(313)
(12,669)
(20,610)
559
(20,051)
7,347
(5,009)
–
7,347
1,869
(313)
(5,322)
(18,741)
–
559
1,869
(18,182)
The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.
Assets
Non-current assets
Intangible assets
Property, plant and equipment
Trade and other receivables
Available-for-sale investment
Investment in associate
Current assets
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Current income tax asset
Derivative financial instruments
Short term investments – funds held on deposit
Cash and cash equivalents
Total assets
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Borrowings
Non-current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Borrowings
Total liabilities
Net assets
Capital and reserves attributable to owners of Velocys plc
Called up share capital
Share premium account
Merger reserve
Share-based payments reserve
Foreign exchange reserve
Accumulated losses
Total equity
Note
17
18
21
20
20
22
21
27
23
23
24
26
25
26
29
29
2016
£’000
34,035
5,637
325
–
5,865
45,862
1,461
811
854
537
–
18,744
22,407
68,269
(2,272)
(323)
(2,595)
(1,343)
(593)
(1,936)
(4,531)
63,738
1,438
149,275
369
15,843
7,065
(110,252)
63,738
2015
£’000
28,378
5,507
–
3,375
–
37,260
1,393
911
780
156
3,000
34,736
40,976
78,236
(7,380)
(288)
(7,668)
(1,327)
(759)
(2,086)
(9,754)
68,482
1,419
149,197
369
15,362
(282)
(97,583)
68,482
The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.
The financial statements on pages 37 to 74 were approved by the Board of directors and authorised for issue on 15 May 2017.
They were signed on its behalf by:
Susan Robertson
Chief Financial Officer
Company number 05712187
38 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 39
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Velocys plc statement of financial position
as at 31 December 2016
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
for the year ended 31 December 2016
Assets
Non-current assets
Investments in subsidiaries
Current assets
Trade and other receivables
Current income tax asset
Total assets
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Total liabilities
Net assets
Capital and reserves attributable to owners of Velocys plc
Called up share capital
Share premium account
Share-based payment reserve
Accumulated losses
Total equity
Note
19
21
24
29
29
2016
£’000
66,831
31
650
67,512
(72)
(72)
67,440
1,438
149,275
15,843
(99,116)
67,440
2015
£’000
126,289
32
600
126,921
(140)
(140)
126,781
1,419
149,197
15,362
(39,197)
126,781
The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.
The Company has elected to take the exemption under Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 not to present the parent company Income
statement and Statement of comprehensive income. The comprehensive loss for the parent company for the year was £59,919,000
(2015: loss £5,433,000), which included a £65,716,000 impairment of investment in subsidiary in 2016 (2015: £nil) see note 19.
The financial statements on pages 37 to 74 were approved by the Board of directors and authorised for issue on 15 May 2017.
They were signed on its behalf by:
Called up
share
capital
£’000
Share
premium
account
£’000
Share-based
payment
reserve
£’000
Merger
reserve
£’000
Foreign
exchange Accumulated
losses
£’000
reserve
£’000
Total
equity
£’000
Balance at 1 January 2015
1,419
149,225
369
13,220
(2,151)
(77,532)
84,550
Comprehensive income
Loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Foreign currency translation differences
Total comprehensive expense
Transactions with owners
Share-based payments – value of employee services
Employee benefit trust reimbursement
Total transactions with owners
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(28)
(28)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
2,142
–
2,142
–
(20,051)
(20,051)
1,869
1,869
–
1,869
(20,051)
(18,182)
–
–
–
–
–
–
2,142
(28)
2,114
Balance at 1 January 2016
1,419
149,197
369
15,362
(282)
(97,583)
68,482
Comprehensive income
Loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Foreign currency translation differences
Total comprehensive expense
Transactions with owners
Share-based payments – value of employee services
Proceeds from share issues
Employee option tax liability settled by the Company
Total transactions with owners
–
–
–
–
19
–
19
–
–
–
–
78
–
78
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
793
–
(312)
481
–
(12,669)
(12,669)
7,347
7,347
–
(12,669)
7,347
(5,322)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
793
97
(312)
578
Balance at 31 December 2016
1,438
149,275
369
15,843
7,065
(110,252)
63,738
The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.
Susan Robertson
Chief Financial Officer
Company number 05712187
40 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 41
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Velocys plc statement of changes in equity
for the year ended at 31 December 2016
Consolidated statement of cash flows
for the year ended 31 December 2016
Balance at 1 January 2015
Comprehensive income
Loss for the year
Total comprehensive expense
Transactions with owners
Share-based payments – value of employee services
Employee benefit trust reimbursement
Total transactions with owners
Balance at 1 January 2016
Comprehensive income
Loss for the year
Total comprehensive income
Transactions with owners
Share-based payments – value of employee services
Proceeds from share issues
Employee option tax liability settled by the Company
Total transactions with owners
Balance at 31 December 2016
Share Share-based
Called up
share capital
£’000
premium
account
£’000
payment Accumulated
losses
£’000
reserve
£’000
Total
equity
£’000
1,419
149,225
13,220
(33,764)
130,100
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(28)
(28)
–
–
2,142
–
2,142
(5,433)
(5,433)
–
–
–
(5,433)
(5,433)
2,142
(28)
2,114
1,419
149,197
15,362
(39,197)
126,781
–
–
–
19
–
19
–
–
–
78
–
78
–
–
793
–
(312)
481
(59,919)
(59,919)
(59,919)
(59,919)
–
–
–
–
793
97
(312)
578
1,438
149,275
15,843
(99,116)
67,440
The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.
Note
Cash flows from operating activities
Operating loss before taxation
Depreciation and amortisation
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
Loss on disposal of intangible assets
Impairment of intangible assets
Write-down of deferred consideration and deferred tax liability
Share-based payments
Loss on derivative financial instruments
Employee option tax liability settled by the Company
Changes in working capital (excluding the effects of exchange differences on consolidation)
– Trade and other receivables
– Trade and other payables
– Inventory
Cash consumed by operations
Tax credits received
Net cash used in operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Purchase of intangible assets
Equity investment in ENVIA
Loan to ENVIA
Interest received
Decrease in funds placed on deposit
Net cash generated from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
(Employee benefit trust reimbursement) net proceeds of issuance of ordinary shares
Proceeds from share issues
Interest paid
Decrease in borrowings
Net cash used in financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Exchange gains on cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.
23
26
23
23
2016
£’000
(17,085)
1,323
1
233
–
–
793
–
(312)
234
(6,004)
138
(20,679)
1,330
(19,349)
(291)
(356)
(1,903)
(295)
136
3,000
291
–
6
(26)
(314)
(334)
(19,392)
34,736
3,400
18,744
2015
£’000
(22,188)
1,277
5
383
1,473
(2,032)
2,142
279
–
(301)
(975)
(1,066)
(21,003)
2,031
(18,972)
(2,262)
(395)
(1,535)
–
401
25,083
21,292
(28)
–
(33)
(271)
(332)
1,988
31,693
1,055
34,736
42 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 43
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Velocys plc statement of cash flows
for the year ended 31 December 2016
Notes to the financial statements
Cash flows from operating activities
Operating loss before taxation
Impairment of subsidiaries
Employee option tax liability settled by the Company
Changes in working capital (excluding the effects of exchange differences on consolidation)
– Trade and other receivables
– Intercompany balances
– Trade and other payables
Cash consumed by operations
Tax credit received
Net cash generated from operating activities
Cash flow from investing activities
Interest received
Net cash generated from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
(Employee benefit trust reimbursement) net proceeds of issuance of ordinary shares
Proceeds from share issues
Net cash used in financing activities
Net movement in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
The notes on pages 45 to 74 are part of these consolidated financial statements.
2016
£’000
(72,485)
65,716
(312)
(68)
6,066
1
(1,082)
1,070
(12)
6
6
–
6
6
–
–
–
2015
£’000
(8,956)
–
–
55
7,310
46
(1,545)
1,573
28
–
–
(28)
–
(28)
–
–
–
1. General information
Velocys plc is a company incorporated in England and Wales and domiciled in England. It operates through a number of subsidiaries
in the UK and the US, and collectively they are referred to in the financial statements as the “Company” or “Velocys”, with Velocys plc
as “Velocys plc” or the “parent company”. The nature of the Company’s operations and its principal activities are set out in the Strategic
report on pages 1 to 21 and the Directors’ report on pages 28 and 29.
The parent company is a public limited company listed on AIM.
2. Accounting policies
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated and parent company financial statements are
summarised below. The policies have been consistently applied to each year presented unless otherwise stated.
Basis of preparation
The consolidated and parent company financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards as adopted by the European Union (IFRSs as adopted by the EU), IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRS IC) Interpretations and
the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS. The statements have been prepared under the historical cost
convention as modified by the revaluation of certain financial assets and liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value.
The preparation of financial statements to conform to IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates and the exercise
of management’s estimate in the application of the Company’s accounting policies. Areas involving a higher degree of judgement or
complexity, and areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements are referenced in note 3.
Going concern
The financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which assumes that the Company will have sufficient funds
available to enable it to continue to trade for the foreseeable future. The nature of the Company’s nascent strategy means that the timing of
milestones and funds generated from developments are difficult to predict at this stage. Management has prepared financial forecasts to
estimate the likely cash requirements of the Company over the next 12 months.
The forecasts include certain assumptions with regard to the following:
(a) successful completion of the ENVIA Oklahoma project start up reaching full operational capacity within 2017 leading to sustainable
stable operations and the subsequent operating cash flows arising from its interest in and commitments to this project.
(b) the costs of ongoing development projects coupled with the Company's ability to reduce certain existing overhead costs.
(c) the Company raising additional funding during 2018, without which the Company will have a funding shortfall by the second quarter
of 2018. The directors continue to review possible sources of additional funding which may include Company level equity, project level
funding and third party licence sales, although at the time of the approval of the financial statements there are no agreements in place
beyond the £10 million fund raise announced in May 2017.
Based on these assumptions, the forecasts show that there is sufficient funding in the Company to continue their activities for the
foreseeable future being not less than 12 months from the date of approval of these financial statements and the directors have
therefore prepared the financial statements on a going concern basis.
However, there are uncertainties in these assumptions, including the costs and timing of completion of the ENVIA start up, the amount of
costs of ongoing development projects, the ability to reduce certain overheads, the ability to raise additional funding, and adverse variations
in these assumptions would mean that the Company may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of
business. These conditions indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include the adjustments that may be required if the Company was unable to
continue as a going concern.
Accounting developments
No new standards, amendments or interpretations, effective for the first time for the financial year beginning on or after 1 January 2016
have had a material impact on the Company or Velocys plc.
The following new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations are mandatory for the first time for the financial year
beginning 1 January 2017. The Company has not chosen to early adopt these standards, but they are considered relevant for future
accounting periods.
Amendment to IAS 7, ‘Statement of cash flows’ on disclosure initiative. These amendments to IAS 7 introduce an additional disclosure that
will enable users of financial statements to evaluate changes in liabilities arising from financing activities. The amendment is part of the
IASB’s Disclosure Initiative, which continues to explore how financial statement disclosure can be improved.
The following new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations are mandatory for the first time for the financial year
beginning 1 January 2018. The Company has not chosen to early adopt these standards, but they are considered relevant for future
accounting periods.
IFRS 9, ‘Financial instruments’. The Company is continuing to assess the impact of IFRS 9; it is not anticipated that adoption of the standard
will have a significant impact on the financial statements.
IFRS 15, ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. This converged standard will improve the financial reporting of revenue and improve
comparability of the top line in financial statements globally. Companies using IFRS will be required to apply the revenue standard for
reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. The Company continues to review the requirements of IFRS 15 Revenue from
contracts with customers. It has identified the revenue streams expected to be impacted and the performance obligations due under
their respective contracts. It does not believe that allocating the contract prices across these performance obligations will have a material
impact to the Income statement. In respect of 2016 revenue, which was all from engineering services, it would not result in any adjustment.
The Company has not chosen to early adopt the standard.
44 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 45
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
2. Accounting policies (continued)
Accounting developments (continued)
The following new standard is mandatory for the first time for the financial year beginning 1 January 2019. This standard is subject to
endorsement by the European Union.
IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. This standard will replace IAS 17 ‘Leases’ and sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation
and disclosure of leases. Lessees will be required to recognise a lease liability reflecting future lease payments and a right-of-use asset
for lease contracts. The IASB has included an optional exemption that can be applied by lessees for certain short-term leases and leases
of low-value assets. A key change arising from IFRS 16 is that most operating leases will be accounted for on the balance sheet for lessees.
As outlined in note 30, at 31 December 2016 the Company has £1,829,000 of operating lease commitments and these are likely to be
recognised on the balance sheet as at transition. The standard replaces IAS 17 ‘Leases’, and related interpretations.
Financial risk management policies
Financial risk management policies are set out in the Strategic report on page 21, and in note 28.
Capital management policies
Capital management policies are set out in note 28.
Significant accounting policies
Foreign currency translation
Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Company’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic
environment in which the entity operates (the functional currency). The consolidated financial statements are presented in sterling (£),
which is Velocys plc’s functional and the Company’s presentation currency.
Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions.
Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of
monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the Income statement. Foreign exchange gains and losses
that relate to borrowings and cash and cash equivalents are presented in the Income statement within Finance income or Finance costs.
The net investment that the Company has in its subsidiary undertakings is its interest in the net assets of that subsidiary. The inclusion of
long-term loans and receivables ("Loans to subsidiaries") as part of the net investment in the subsidiary undertaking is determined where
settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future. All loans to subsidiaries by the parent company meet these criteria.
On this basis the loans to subsidiaries, being monetary items that are receivable from a foreign subsidiary undertaking, are regarded
as an extension of the Company's net investment in that foreign subsidiary undertaking. Exchange differences, arising on a monetary item that
forms part of the Company's net investment in a foreign operation that is a subsidiary or associate, are recorded as follows.
In the consolidated financial statements that include the foreign operation and the reporting entity, exchange differences are recognised
initially in a separate component of Other comprehensive income and, on disposal of the net investment, in profit or loss.
In the parent company financial statements, exchange differences are recognised in the Income statement.
Entities within Velocys
The results and financial position of all Velocys entities that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency
(none of which is of a hyper-inflationary economy) are translated into the presentation currency as follows:
1. assets and liabilities for each balance sheet presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of that balance sheet;
2.
3. all resulting exchange differences are recognised as a movement within other comprehensive income.
income and expenses for each income statement are translated at average exchange rates; and
3. Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial information in conformity with IFRS requires the use of estimates and judgements that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities at the reporting date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Although these estimates and judgements are based on management’s best knowledge of the amount, event or action, actual results
ultimately may differ. Estimates and judgements that have a significant risk of causing material adjustment to the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities within the next financial period are discussed in the relevant note and listed below.
Item of critical estimate and/or judgement
Note
Exceptional items – recognition of previously deferred income
Intangible assets – impairment assessment
Investment in subsidiaries – impairment assessment
Recognition of investment in associate
4
17
19
20
4. Exceptional items
Items that are significant by virtue of their size or nature, which are considered non-recurring and which are excluded from the underlying
profit measures used by the Board to monitor and measure the underlying performance of the Company are classified as exceptional
operating items. They include, for instance, costs directly attributable to the integration of an acquired business, significant site
consolidation costs and other significant restructuring costs. Exceptional operating items are included within the appropriate
Consolidated income statement category but are highlighted separately in the notes to the financial statements.
The following exceptional items have been included in the Consolidated income statement.
Costs of unsuccessful acquisition
Recognition of previously deferred income
Impairment of intangible assets
Deferred tax liability write down
Deferred consideration release
Total
2016
£’000
(2,809)
2,496
–
–
–
(313)
2015
£’000
–
–
(1,473)
269
1,763
559
In 2016, the Company sought to acquire certain assets of a US-based GTL company that had gone into administration but did not
complete the acquisition. The Company received a partial reimbursement by the acquirer of the plant. This transaction was judged to be
exceptional by its nature as a potential business combination. Costs of the unsuccessful acquisition in the table above represent amounts
spent net of the related reimbursement.
The Company recognised £2,496,000 of previously deferred income in respect of the cancellation of a contract with Ventech for reactors.
The deferred income arose on receipt of upfront payments. The full amount was recognised as Other income. It has been included
in exceptional items as it was a significant, one-off change to a material contract.
The impairment of intangible assets in 2015 related to customer contracts, and was the discounted value of future income, which the
Company had expected to receive in 2015 upon obtaining a final investment decision (FID) by outside investors in the Ashtabula project.
As FID was not reached in 2015, this balance and the related deferred tax liability were written down to £nil.
On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign operations are taken to
shareholders’ equity.
The deferred consideration arrangement required the Company to issue shares in Velocys plc to the former owners of Velocys Project
Solutions, also contingent upon the achievement of FID at Ashtabula. It was written down to £nil in 2015 and no shares were issued.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity
and translated at the closing rate.
Other significant accounting policies are incorporated in the note to which they apply.
Critical estimates and judgements
The recognition as income in 2016 of non-refundable amounts from Ventech previously recorded in deferred income is based on an
assessment of the contractual position, taking into account both the terms of the original contract and subsequent amendments.
The Company believes that all obligations under this contract have been fulfilled and therefore that it is probable that the economic
benefits associated with the transaction have flowed to the Company and that recognition of the related income is appropriate.
This is a binary judgement, and, therefore, the Company has recognised revenue at the point at which the probability criterion was met.
46 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 47
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
5. Segmental information
The Company’s chief operating decision-making unit is the Senior Management Team (SMT). The SMT reviews the Company’s internal
reporting in order to assess performance and allocate resources, and has determined the operating segments based on these reports.
The SMT considers that the business comprises a single activity, which is the design, development, marketing and sale of technology
for the production of synthetic fuels (and speciality products). The newly announced strategy extends this activity to facilitating project
development by putting together partnerships with technology licensors, engineers, feedstock suppliers, off-takers and financing entities.
However, this is still considered to be part of the same synthetic fuels activity. The SMT reviews the Company’s profit or loss and its cash
flows, assets and liabilities on a Company-wide basis. In carrying out these reviews, the SMT considers all material items of income and
expenditure that are directly attributable to individual commercial projects and development programmes. The internal management
reports do not allocate assets and liabilities or shared overheads to individual products or projects.
The business has one segment on the basis that the key end use market is that of synthetic fuels production. At this stage, the synthetic
fuels segment represents 100% of the business and therefore represents the only material segment. Based on management’s judgement,
all products and services offered within the operating segment have similar economic characteristics.
Internal and external reporting is on a consolidated basis, with purchases and sales between subsidiaries eliminated on consolidation.
Therefore, the segmental and financial information is the same as that set out in the Consolidated income statement, Consolidated
statement of comprehensive income, the Consolidated statement of financial position, the Consolidated statement of cash flows and
the Consolidated statement of changes in equity.
The SMT assesses the performance of the operating segment based on a measure of operating loss.
The Company’s operating segment operates in three main geographical areas. Revenue is allocated based on the country in which the
customer is located.
Europe
Americas
Asia Pacific
Total revenue
2016
£’000
273
1,163
9
1,445
Revenues during the year originated in the United Kingdom and United States.
The total amount of revenue recognised from customers where revenue comprises 10% or more of Company revenue is as follows:
Customer 1
Customer 2*
Customer 3
Customers less than 10%
Total revenue
* Relates to different customers in 2016 and 2015.
Non-current assets held in the United States are as follows:
Intangible assets
Property, plant and equipment
Trade and other receivable
Available-for-sale investment
Investment in associate
Total
2016
£’000
619
444
163
219
1,445
2016
£’000
33,590
5,355
325
–
5,865
45,135
All other non-current assets were held in the United Kingdom and amounted to £727,000 (2015: £854,000).
2015
£’000
400
1,589
13
2,002
2015
£’000
1,480
400
–
122
2,002
2015
£’000
27,956
5,075
–
3,375
–
36,406
6. Revenue
Revenue is measured as the fair value of consideration received or receivable for goods and services provided in the normal course of
business, net of trade discounts, value added tax and other sales-related taxes after eliminating sales within the Company. Revenue is
recognised only when the amount of revenue can be reliably measured and it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the
Company. When uncertainty subsequently arises, any resulting provision is recognised as an expense and not a reduction in revenue.
Revenue related to Fischer-Tropsch (FT) reactors, catalyst and licence
The purchase of an FT reactor is part of an integrated package consisting of the three revenue streams for the Company; the sale of the
FT reactor, the use of the FT catalyst for a certain term and revenue from the licence fee that grants rights to use the related intellectual
property (IP) for the length of the licence term. The IP is not transferred at the end of the licence term.
In order to recognise revenue, each component of the FT process is identified, which includes the sale of the reactor, an initial licence fee,
the sale of catalyst and ongoing engineering services. Values are based on the terms of the sales contract. Once the fair value
of the components has been determined, revenue is recognised in line with the underlying nature of the contract.
FT reactor revenue and costs are recognised when substantially all risk and reward associated with the reactor has passed to the
customer. Under the Company’s standard terms this is on delivery of the reactor, where “delivery” means available for shipping to the
customer’s site, although this term may vary as contracts are negotiated.
Catalyst sales income will be recognised monthly over the term of the arrangement.
Licence fee revenue will be recognised on commencement of the contract provided that the fair value of the licence fee can be
determined. However, if no reliable fair value can be determined, any revenue associated with the licence fee will be deferred and
recognised in line with the reactor sales. Where a proportion of the licence fee is at risk until the successful completion of a performance
test, this proportion is not recognised as revenue until the test is passed; any payments received are held in deferred income until that
time.
Where the underlying costs associated with any component cannot be estimated, any profit element identified is deferred until such time
as the costs can be reliably estimated.
Revenue related to engineering services
Revenue from engineering services is earned on a time and materials basis, and is recognised as the work is performed.
As engineering services were the source of all 2016 revenue, no critical estimates were required.
The majority of the Company’s revenue is derived from a small number of significant commercial customers and development partners,
who are not related parties.
FT reactor, catalyst and licence
Engineering services
Total
7. Finance income
Interest income on bank deposits
Net fair value gains on forward foreign exchange contracts
Foreign exchange gains
Total Finance income
2016
£’000
–
1,445
1,445
2016
£’000
129
668
2,547
3,344
Interest income is accrued on a time basis by reference to the principal outstanding and the applicable interest rate.
8. Finance costs
Unwinding of discount on deferred licence payments payable
Interest on finance leases
Interest on borrowings
Total Finance costs
2016
£’000
–
5
21
26
2015
£’000
1,820
182
2,002
2015
£’000
329
381
445
1,155
2015
£’000
20
9
24
53
48 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 49
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
9. Other income
Other income consists of items such as sales of fixed assets, contractual and legal settlements and any other operating income
recognised outside of commercial activities. Other income derived from sales of fixed assets and non-commercial activities is recognised
on an accruals basis. Legal settlements are recognised as income when a final judgement is received.
12. Employee benefit expense
Short term employee benefits
Accruals are included to reflect the cost of short term compensation to employees for absences such as paid leave.
Before exceptional items:
Contractual and legal settlements
Sale of fixed assets
Total other income before exceptional items
Exceptional items (see note 4):
Recognition of deferred income
Deferred consideration release
Total other income exceptional items
Total other income
2016
£’000
252
20
272
2,496
–
2,496
2,768
2015
£’000
1,996
13
2,009
–
1,763
1,763
3,772
In 2016 Other income included receipts from settlements with Toyo and MODEC, which offset costs previously recorded in Administrative
expenses, and the recognition of deferred income in respect of cancellation of the Ventech contract (see note 4).
In 2015 Other income included receipt of settlements arising from two legal disputes, with CompactGTL and Johnson Matthey,
which offset previously recorded Administrative expenses and the release of deferred consideration that would have been due
to the former owners of Velocys Project Solutions if FID been achieved at Ashtabula in 2015 (see note 4).
10. Expenses by nature
Employee benefit expense (see note 12)
Sub-contractor and consultant costs
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment: owned (note 18)
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment: leased (note 18)
Amortisation of intangible assets (note 17)
Operating lease expense – plant and machinery
Operating lease expense – other
Patent and other IP costs
Materials expense
Services
Inventories write-down
Other expenses
Total cost of sales and administrative expenses before exceptional items
2016
£’000
10,212
1,837
1,077
55
191
72
517
313
642
677
148
2,748
18,489
Included in administrative expenses were research and development costs of £10,075,000 (2015: £13,199,000).
11. Auditor’s remuneration
Fees payable to Company’s auditor and its associates for the audit of parent company
and consolidated financial statements
Fees payable to Company’s auditor and its associates for other services:
– The audit of Company’s subsidiaries
– Taxation compliance service
Total
2016
£’000
78
39
25
142
2015
£’000
13,480
2,385
975
50
252
31
475
579
3,924
738
218
3,651
26,758
2015
£’000
62
31
13
106
Pensions
The Company operates various defined contribution pension schemes for its employees. The Company has no legal or constructive
obligations to pay further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employees the benefit derived from the
current and prior periods.
The amount charged to the Income statement in respect of pension costs and other post-retirement benefits is the contributions payable
in the year. Differences between contributions payable and contributions actually paid are shown as accruals in the balance sheet.
The Company has no further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid.
The average monthly number of Company employees (including Executive Directors) was as follows.
Research, design and development
Administration
Total average headcount
Their aggregate remuneration comprised the following items.
Wages and salaries
Social security costs
Other pension costs
Severance expense
Share-based payments granted to directors and employees (note 15)
Total remuneration
The parent company has no employees and no remuneration.
2016
number
65
25
90
2016
£’000
8,312
673
314
120
793
10,212
2015
number
79
29
108
2015
£’000
9,822
679
326
511
2,142
13,480
Details of directors’ remuneration are given in the audited information in the Directors’ remuneration report on pages 30 to 33, which forms
part of these financial statements.
Included in wages and salaries were costs for research and development employees of £5,256,000 (2015: £6,011,000).
13. Income tax
Current tax, including UK corporation tax and foreign tax, is provided for at the amount expected to be paid (or recovered) based on the tax
rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
Company
Current tax:
R&D tax credit relating to prior years
R&D tax credit relating to current year
Current tax total
Deferred tax:
Write off of intangible assets
Income tax total
2016
£’000
(550)
(854)
(1,404)
–
(1,404)
2015
£’000
(255)
(780)
(1,035)
269
(766)
Due to the availability of losses incurred in the year, there is no charge to corporation tax. The Company recognised £1,404,000 for R&D tax
credits (2015: £1,035,000). The credit relating to the current year is on an accruals basis, which is an estimate of the amount to be claimed
from HMRC based on the activity level and significant R&D costs of the current year compared to previous years. The credit relating to
prior years is the difference between the brought forward accrual and the settlement from HMRC.
The accrual for the current year, which is the majority of the credit, is based on an assessment of the Company’s projects, to determine
which ones qualify under the HMRC’s rules, and to estimate the level of allowable cost within each, based on the nature of costs.
50 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 51
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
13. Income tax (continued)
The actual tax credit for the current and previous year is higher (2015: higher) than the theoretical amount that would arise using the
weighted average tax rate applicable to the results of the consolidated entities, for the reasons set out in the following reconciliation.
Company
Loss before income tax
Tax calculated at domestic tax rates applicable to losses in the respective countries
Tax effects of:
− Expenses not deductible for tax purposes
− Unutilised tax losses
− R&D tax credit
Current tax total
2016
£’000
(14,073)
(4,147)
51
4,096
(1,404)
(1,404)
2015
£’000
(21,086)
(5,594)
468
5,126
(1,035)
(1,035)
The weighted average applicable tax rate was 29.5% (2015: 26.5%).
The standard rate of corporation tax in the United Kingdom changed from 21% to 20% with effect from 1 April 2015. Accordingly,
profits in the United Kingdom for 2016 were taxed at 20%. Legislation to reduce the main rate of corporation tax to 19% from 1 April 2017
was enacted on 18 November 2015. Legislation to further reduce the rate to 17% from 1 April 2020 was enacted on 15 September 2016.
Unrecognised UK deferred tax balances have been measured at 17% (recognised: £nil).
US corporate income tax is based on a graduated scale ranging from 15% to 35% tax rate depending on the level of taxable income.
Most US companies with taxable income under $10,000,000 have an effective rate of 34%. Unrecognised US deferred tax balances have
been measured at 34% (recognised: £nil).
14. Deferred tax
Deferred tax is recognised, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax basis of assets and liabilities
and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax is not accounted for if it arises from initial recognition
of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction affected neither accounting
nor taxable profit or loss. Tax amounts are determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the
balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realised or the deferred income tax liability
is settled.
Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the
temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries
except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the parent company and it is probable that the
temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
The movement in deferred tax in the year was as follows.
Company
Recognised
Deferred tax liability
Write off of intangible assets
Deferred tax carried forward
Company
Unrecognised
Deferred tax assets
− Trading losses
− Equity settled options
Total
2016
£’000
–
–
–
2016
£’000
(27,366)
(195)
(27,561)
2015
£’000
269
(269)
–
2015
£’000
(22,918)
(605)
(23,523)
15. Share-based payments
Velocys plc issues share options to employees of its subsidiaries that are accounted for as equity settled. There are a number of schemes
covering employees, executives and external consultants; most are based on a service period but some include performance conditions,
both market based and non-market based.
Options are measured at fair value (excluding the effect of non market-based vesting conditions) at the date of grant. For executive
options with market performance conditions attached the Monte Carlo pricing model is used, all other options apply the Black-Scholes
model.
The basic assumptions that feed into both models are volatility of the share price, annual risk free rate and dividend yield. Volatility
is estimated using the average daily share price from the previous five years, the risk free rate is based on the Bank of England’s yield
curve tables, and it is assumed no dividend will be paid over the life of the option. Additionally, for the Monte Carlo model, expected life is
assumed to be the earliest point at which the shares may vest. This has been adjusted, using management’s best estimate, for the effects
of non-transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioural considerations.
At the end of each reporting period, the Company revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to vest, based on
non-market vesting conditions and service calculations. It recognises the impact of the revision to original estimates in the Income
statement, recorded in Administrative expenses, with a corresponding adjustment to equity.
When options are exercised the Company issues new shares; proceeds received, net of attributable transaction costs, are credited to
share capital and premium.
For the parent company, grants of options are treated as a capital contribution to the subsidiary of which the option holder is an employee.
The share based payment expense is recognised as an additional investment in the subsidiary with a corresponding credit to equity.
The number of options outstanding at 31 December 2016 and the expense recognised in the profit or loss for these schemes, along with
bonus shares and other schemes, are as follows.
Scheme
Employees UK/US
ELTIP (Executives)
Velocys, Inc.
Bonus shares
Other
Total
Options
outstanding
3,228,556
8,166,548
83,248
79,760
253,879
11,811,991
2016
Income
statement
£’000
275
496
–
–
22
793
Options
outstanding
4,188,283
10,912,628
95,978
421,760
253,879
15,872,528
2015
Income
statement
£’000
281
1,843
–
–
18
2,142
Employees UK/US
This scheme covers all employees of the Company, and was previously referred to as the EMI scheme; however, the Company ceased
to qualify for EMI status due to the value of its gross assets.
Options are granted to employees when they join the Company, they vest three, four or five years from the date of joining, subject to the
employee completing a corresponding service period, and expire after ten years. The exercise price is the mid-market value of Velocys plc’s
ordinary shares on the day prior to grant. Options are fair valued at grant date using the Black-Scholes model, and expensed over
the vesting period.
During 2015 options were granted to certain employees that will vest in January 2017 subject to meeting certain non-market performance
conditions; other conditions are per the main employee scheme. The fair value assessment of these options included a review of the likely
fulfilment of the performance conditions.
Movements in the number of options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise prices are as follows.
Weighted
average
exercise price
109.60p
28.86p
131.47p
81.29p
121.26p
2016
Number of
options
4,188,283
104,615
(1,062,332)
(2,000)
3,228,566
Weighted
average
exercise price
119.33p
107.09p
161.30p
59.16p
109.60p
2015
Number of
options
4,179,111
1,159,173
(1,138,335)
(11,666)
4,188,283
At 31 December 2016 the Company had a net unrecognised deferred tax asset of £27,366,000 (2015: £22,918,000) arising from trading
losses since incorporation. No recognition (2015: £nil) of the net deferred tax asset has been made at 31 December 2016 on the grounds
of uncertainty over its recoverability in light of the Company’s nascent revenue streams and commitment to continued investment in
research and development and therefore there is no impact on the current or prior year income statement.
Of this unrecognised deferred tax asset, £11,775,000 (2015: £16,580,000 reported, £11,733,000 restated) is anticipated to remain
available indefinitely to offset against future taxable trading profits of the entities in which the losses arose. The remainder has expiry
dates between 2023 and 2036 (2015: 2023 and 2035).
At 1 January
Granted
Forfeited
Exercised
At 31 December
The amount of the above net unrecognised deferred tax asset attributable to the parent company was £8,381,000 (2015: £8,278,000),
all of which is anticipated to remain available indefinitely (2015: all).
Of the 3,228,566 options outstanding at 31 December 2016, 1,875,442 were exercisable (2015: 1,371,533). The weighted average exercise
price of the exercisable shares was 57.88p (2015: 71.38p).
52 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 53
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
15. Share-based payments (continued)
Options outstanding at the end of the year have the following expiry dates and exercise prices.
Movements in the number of options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise prices are as follows.
Year of expiry
Range of
exercise price
Number of
options
2017
2018
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Total
124.00p
159.00p
57.50 – 70.72p
51.00 – 74.79p
48.00 – 117.06p
129.88 – 213.79p
146.00 – 303.54p
62.50 – 182.90p
29.75 – 40.65p
16,129
62,893
42,616
1,024,140
425,000
494,000
293,334
775,839
94,615
29.75– 303.54p
3,228,566
2016
Weighted
average
exercise price
124.00p
159.00p
68.83p
68.09p
93.08p
200.73p
227.39p
126.83p
31.91p
121.26p
2015
Weighted
average
exercise price
124.00p
159.00p
58.55p
59.72p
79.19p
168.18p
196.17p
106.88p
–
109.60p
Number of
options
16,129
62,893
51,748
1,316,140
468,200
514,000
603,334
1,155,839
–
4,188,283
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year was13.65p (2015: 29.32p) per option. The significant inputs into the
model were as follows.
Weighted average share price at grant date
Weighted average exercise price
Expected volatility
Weighted average annual risk free rate
Dividend yield
Weighted average expected life
2016
28.86
28.86
54%
0.4%
0%
4.0 years
2015
107.09
107.09
44%
0.8%
0%
2.9 years
Total expense recognised in the income statement for share options granted to directors and employees was £275,000 (2015: £281,000).
Executive options
Executive options (also referred to as “ELTIP” in the Directors’ remuneration report, and “ELTIP” and “NELTIP” in the 2015 Annual report and
accounts) are awarded to Executive Directors and senior managers of the Company.
The fair value of options is recognised from the start of the relevant service period to the end of the vesting period.
Executive options granted up to and including 2014, are exercisable at a price of 1p or at a price equal to the mid-market value of the
parent company’s ordinary shares on the day prior to the grant. Options vest immediately or after a period of one, two or three years
from grant, they expire after ten years and are forfeited if the employee leaves the Company before the options vest.
Options, including Restricted Stock Units (RSUs), awarded after 2014 were divided into those with a service period and those with market
performance conditions. Except for the former CEO, service period options represented 23% of the award; they vest two years after
the conclusion of the period over which performance is measured; the market performance conditions on which the rest of the award
was based pertain to the compound annual growth rate of the Company’s market capitalisation excluding fund raising subsequent to
1 January 2015; market performance options are measurable after three years from the start of the service period, with possible
re-measurements one, and two years later; options are subject to the discretion of the Board if the employee leaves the Company
before the options vest.
For the former CEO, a five-year award was made in 2015, for which service period options represented 30% of the RSUs. Market
performance options were measurable after five years from the start of the service period, with a possible re-measurement one year later.
Under the terms of the 2015 Settlement Agreement between the Company and the former CEO, 2,216,666 RSUs from this award were
deemed to have vested; the remainder was forfeited. In 2016 it was agreed that only 1,330,000 of these RSUs would be transferred to the
former CEO, and in respect of the balance, the Company would settle the expected associated tax liability.
No options have been granted in 2016 (2015: 8,364,386 options). However, the Remuneration Committee intends to introduce a new
equity-based incentive scheme for executives in 2017, and, in the allocation of such awards, may take into consideration the fact that
no 2016 awards were made.
At 1 January
Granted
Forfeited
Exercised
At 31 December
Weighted
average
exercise price
64.23p
–
Nil
0.15p
84.92p
2016
Number of
options
10,912,627
–
(1,176,079)
(1,570,000)
8,166,548
Weighted
average
exercise price
110.71p
98.10p
Nil
–
69.70p
2015
Number of
options
9,526,635
8,364,386
(6,978,394)
–
10,912,627
Of the 8,166,548 options outstanding at 31 December 2016, 6,022,848 were exercisable (2015: 7,051,571). The weighted average exercise
price of the exercisable shares was 115.14p (2015: 42.90p).
Share options and RSUs outstanding at the end of the year have the following expiry dates (RSU latest exercise dates) and exercise prices.
Year of expiry
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Total
Range of
exercise price
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil – 1.00p
Nil
1.00p – 58.00p
49.00p
159.00p
153.00p – 163.50p
Nil – 163.50p
Number of
options
–
135,558
213,883
524,680
352,852
1,175,000
2,498,503
1,841,837
1,424,235
8,166,548
2016
Weighted
average
exercise price
Nil
Nil
Nil
0.20p
Nil
39.05p
49.00p
159.00p
163.04p
84.92p
2015
Weighted
average
exercise price
Nil
Nil
0.29p
0.35p
Nil
39.05p
49.00p
159.00p
162.72p
64.23p
Number of
options
2,216,667
135,834
343,639
697,779
532,134
1,175,000
2,498,503
1,841,837
1,471,235
10,912,628
No options have been granted in respect of 2016; the weighted average fair value of the market performance options and the service
period options granted in 2015 was 108.13p per option. The significant inputs into the model were as follows.
Weighted average share price at grant date
Weighted average exercise price
Weighted average expected volatility
Weighted average annual risk free rate
Dividend yield
Weighted average expected life
2016
–
–
–
–
–
–
2015
155.00p
Nil
51%
0.79%
0%
2.68 years
Total expense recognised in the income statement for executive options granted to directors and employees was £496,000 in 2016 (2015:
£1,843,000). No further expense was accrued within the share-based payments charge (2015: £nil).
At the time of exercising share options, executives of the Company may apply to an employee benefit trust managed by Oxford Catalysts
Trustees Limited for a distribution in respect of the exercise value of their options. The trustees then request a contribution from the
Company in respect of the grant made. The total value of funds distributed to executives by Oxford Catalysts Trustees Limited during the
year in respect of executive options was £13,300 (2015: £nil).
54 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 55
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
15. Share-based payments (continued)
Velocys, Inc. scheme
The Velocys, Inc. Stock Compensation Plan (“Pre-Acquisition Scheme”) was acquired as part of the acquisition of Velocys, Inc. by Velocys
plc, formerly Oxford Catalysts Group PLC, on 20 November 2008. The scheme was started in 2001 and covers all US-based employees.
Prior to the acquisition, Velocys, Inc.’s Board of directors granted non-qualified share options to employees with expiry 10 years from grant
date. The options’ exercise price was equal to the stock’s fair market value at the date of grant. Options are forfeited if an employee leaves
the Company. Generally, options vest as follows.
After one year of service from vest start date:
Each month subsequent to one year of service: 1/48th of grant
25% of grant
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the acquisition of Velocys, Inc., each vested and unvested Pre-Acquisition Scheme option existing
on the acquisition date was converted into 0.3659 of a Velocys plc, formerly Oxford Catalyst Group PLC, option (the ratio of the value of
one share of Velocys, Inc. stock to one share of Velocys plc, formerly Oxford Catalyst Group PLC stock) with a corresponding increase to the
exercise price. Share options are exercisable in US dollars.
During 2011, the Company reviewed employee incentives and concluded that the Pre-Acquisition Scheme options did not provide the
intended incentive or retention value for its employees due to significant shifts in the market price since the original grants. Consequently,
holders of these options were offered the opportunity to forfeit their options and have new options issued. All such new issues vest in
three years and expire ten years from date of grant.
Details of the share options outstanding under the Velocys, Inc. scheme are as follows.
At 1 January
Forfeited
Exercised
At 31 December
Weighted
average
exercise price
$1.08
$0.93
$0.00
$1.10
2016
Number of
options
95,978
(12,730)
–
83,248
Weighted
average
exercise price
$1.00
$0.82
$0.77
$1.08
2015
Number of
options
130,062
(21,503)
(12,581)
95,978
Of the options outstanding presented above, 83,248 (2015: 95,978) were exercisable as of 31 December 2016. The weighted average share
price of the exercisable shares was $1.10 (2015: $1.08).
Share options outstanding at the end of the year have the following expiry dates and exercise prices.
Year of expiry
2017
2021
Total
Range of
exercise price
per share
$2.21 – $2.54
$0.93
$0.77 – $2.54
Number of
options
9,218
74,030
83,248
2016
Weighted
average
exercise price
$2.45
$0.93
$1.10
2015
Weighted
average
exercise price
$2.45
$0.93
$1.08
Number of
options
9,218
86,760
95,978
Total expense recognised in the income statement for share options granted under the Velocys, Inc. plan was £nil (2015: £nil).
Bonus shares
The Company previously maintained two bonus share schemes for certain executives: one in respect of employees of Velocys Technologies
Limited and one in respect of employees of Velocys, Inc. Under both schemes, the value of the bonus was based upon the executive’s salary
as well as the Company and the executive achieving certain targets throughout the year. No awards were, or will be, made under these
schemes during, or in respect of, 2016.
The Velocys Technologies Limited bonus share scheme awarded nominal value share options (1p) that were issued subsequent to the end
of previous financial years. The awards vested on the date of grant and expire 10 years thereafter. Details of the bonus shares outstanding
under the Velocys Technologies Limited bonus share scheme are as follows.
At 1 January
Exercised
At 31 December
Exercise
price
1.00p
1.00p
1.00p
2016
Number of
options
421,760
(342,000)
79,760
Exercise
price
1.00p
–
1.00p
Velocys Technologies Limited bonus share options outstanding at the end of the year have the following expiry dates.
Year of expiry
2019
2020
2021
Total
Exercise
price
1.00p
1.00p
1.00p
1.00p
2016
Number of
options
42,105
–
37,655
79,760
2015
Number of
options
421,760
–
421,760
2015
Number of
options
42,105
342,000
37,655
421,760
The Velocys, Inc. bonus share scheme consists of deferred shares awarded subsequent to year end at a nominal price of 1p. 20% of the
award is due to be granted on each anniversary of the date of award. Shares remaining to be granted in future years totalled 16,418.
No bonus share grants were made for either scheme in 2016 (2015: nil). All expense has been recognised prior to 2015.
Other share options
The Board has approved the granting of share options to a small number of consultants (non-employees) who provide a strategic service
to the business.
Options are granted either in respect of a completed service period, in which case they vest immediately, or in respect of a future service
period, in which case they vest over periods of up to three years. They expire after 10 years. Exercise prices range from £nil to the mid-
market value of Velocys plc’s ordinary shares on the day prior to grant. Options are fair valued at grant date using the Black-Scholes model
(which is not the fair value of goods and services received). For a completed service period, fair value is expensed over the service period
plus the vesting period, for a future service period, fair value is expensed over the vesting period.
Movements in the number of consultants’ share options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise prices are as follows.
At 1 January
Granted
Forfeited
Exercised
At 31 December
Weighted
average
exercise price
87.39p
–
–
–
87.39p
2016
Number of
options
253,879
–
–
–
253,879
Weighted
average
exercise price
51.15p
108.03p
–
–
87.39p
2015
Number of
options
92,129
161,750
–
–
253,879
Of the 253,879 options outstanding at 31 December 2016, 163,879 were exercisable (2015: 103,879). The weighted average exercise price
of the exercisable shares was 77.58p (2015: 51.88p).
56 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 57
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
15. Share-based payments (continued)
Share options outstanding at the end of the year have the following expiry dates and exercise prices.
Year of expiry
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Total
Range of
exercise price
1.00p
1.00p
1.00 – 53.10p
145.25p
105.25 – 143.5p
1.00 – 145.25p
Number of
options
6,500
10,204
54,050
21,375
161,750
253,879
2016
Weighted
average
exercise price
1.00p
1.00p
29.44p
145.25p
108.03p
87.39p
2015
Weighted
average
exercise price
1.00p
1.00p
29.44p
145.25p
108.03p
84.67p
Number of
options
6,500
10,204
54,050
21,375
161,750
253,879
No options were granted during 2016. In 2016 an award was made to Jan Verloop, who resigned from the Board of Velocys plc
in September 2016, in respect of consultancy services thereafter performed in 2016; these options will be granted in 2017. The number
of options is determined by the average share price in the quarter prior to the service period, and the options will vest immediately.
The weighted average fair value of options granted in 2015 using the Black-Scholes valuation model was 22.51p per option. The significant
inputs into the model were as follows.
Weighted average share price at grant date
Weighted average exercise price
Weighted average expected volatility
Weighted average annual risk free rate
Dividend yield
Weighted average expected life
2016
–
–
–
–
–
–
2015
108.03p
108.03p
43%
0.8%
0%
1.66 years
The share-based payment expense for the year includes a cost of £22,000 (2015: £18,000) relating to options granted to consultants.
Share-based payments charge
The total charge for share-based payments during the year was £793,000 (2015: £2,142,000) of which £357,000 (2015: £1,544,000) relates
to options granted to directors and the remainder to other employees.
16. Loss per share
The basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss attributable to owners of the parent company by the weighted average number
of ordinary shares in issue during the year.
Loss attributable to owners of Velocys plc (£’000s)
Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue
Basic and diluted loss per share (pence)
2016
(12,669)
143,282,963
(8.84)
2015
(20,051)
141,915,307
(14.13)
Diluted loss per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of shares in issue to assume conversion of all potential
dilutive shares. Share options have not been included in the number of shares used for the purpose of calculating diluted loss per share
since these would be anti-dilutive for the period presented. At the end of 2016 there were no other potentially dilutive instruments
(see note 33). Details of share options are given in note 15.
17. Intangible assets
Significant accounting policies
Cost or valuation and amortisation
Goodwill
Of the total Goodwill of £8,113,000, £5,445,000 (2015: £4,519,000) originates from the acquisition of Velocys, Inc. in 2008 and £2,668,000
(2015: £2,214,000) from the acquisition of VPS in 2014. Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value
of the Company’s share of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.
Goodwill is not amortised.
In-process technology
In-process technology consists of purchased intangibles and capitalised development costs and is carried at cost less accumulated
amortisation and impairment losses.
Purchased intangibles arose from the acquisition of Velocys, Inc. and Velocys Project Solutions, LLC (VPS).
In respect of intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination, the Company recognises these as distinct from goodwill
provided they are separable or arise from contractual or other legal rights, and their fair value can be measured reliably.
Intangible assets are initially recognised at fair value, which is regarded as their cost. They are subsequently held at cost less
accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. Amortisation is charged when assets are brought into use. The Company uses the
units-of-production method of amortisation with the measured unit being reactors produced. The number of units used in the model
is approximately 1,400 (2015: 1,400) four-core reactors based on projections of future sales. Amortisation began in 2015 based on the
manufacture of the first commercial reactors. It is charged to Administrative expenses in the Income statement.
Research costs are recognised as an expense in the Income statement as they are incurred.
Development costs, where the related expenditure is separately identifiable and measurable, and management are satisfied as to the
ultimate technical and commercial viability of the project and that the asset will generate future economic benefit based on all relevant
available information, are recognised as an intangible asset. Costs arising from funded projects are also recognised to the extent that
they meet the relevant criteria, net of any amounts reimbursed by research partners. Capitalised development costs are carried at cost
less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. They are amortised, from the point the asset is available for use in the manner
intended by management, on the units of production basis, over the period of the assets’ expected benefit. Development costs not
meeting the criteria for capitalisation are expensed as incurred.
Patents, licences and trademarks
Patents and trademarks are recorded at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. Amortisation is charged
on a straight line basis over a period of 20 years, which is their estimated useful economic life. Residual values and useful lives
are reviewed annually and adjusted if appropriate. The Company decided to abandon certain non-core patents in 2016 and 2015.
This resulted in a loss on disposal of patents of £213,000 (2015: £375,000).
Licences are recorded at the present value of minimum licence payments. Amortisation is charged when related revenue starts to be
earned and will be charged on a straight line basis over the life of the licences. Residual values and useful lives are reviewed annually
and adjusted if appropriate.
Customer contracts
Customer contracts are carried at cost less impairment losses. The customer contract value that was written off in 2015 related
to an expected project development fee negotiated in the acquisition of VPS in 2014. Its value was contingent on achieving a final
investment decision on the Ashtabula project in 2015, which did not happen.
Software
Purchased software is recorded at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. Amortisation is charged on a straight-line
basis over its estimated useful life of three years.
Impairment
Goodwill is tested annually for impairment, and also whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate the carrying value may
not be recoverable. Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units for the purpose of impairment testing; however, since 2015 just a single
cash-generating unit, synthetic fuels, has been recognised. This reflected the fact that, although the Company has several technology
streams, it measures progress and performance using one business segment (see note 5).
The Company has no indefinite-life intangible assets other than goodwill. For intangible assets that are not yet available for use,
impairment testing is performed annually. The carrying amounts of the Company’s available-for-use intangible assets (excluding
goodwill) are reviewed at each balance sheet date or when events or changes in circumstance indicate their carrying value may not be
recoverable to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If such an indication exists, the asset’s recoverable amount
is estimated.
58 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 59
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
17. Intangible assets (continued)
To the extent the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, the difference is recorded as an expense in the Income statement.
The recoverable amount used is the higher of the value in use and fair value less costs of disposal. For the purpose of impairment testing,
assets are generally assessed individually or at a CGU level, which represents the lowest level for which there are separately identifiable
cash inflows that are largely independent of cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets. The determination of CGUs is consistent
with that detailed for goodwill.
An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. An impairment loss in respect of intangible assets (excluding goodwill) is
reversed if the subsequent increase in recoverable amount can be related objectively to an event occurring after the loss was recognised,
or if there has been a change in the estimate used to determine the recoverable amount. A loss is reversed only to the extent that the
asset’s carrying amount does not exceed that which would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment
loss had been recognised.
An impairment has not been recorded for 2016. The impairment of a customer contract in 2015 related to the failure of the Ashtabula
project to achieve final investment decision within a specified timeframe after the acquisition of VPS. The remainder of Intangibles,
(Patents, licence and trademarks, and Software) are internally generated.
Critical estimates and judgements
In assessing whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired, an entity shall consider, as a minimum, a number of indicators
of potential impairment. The Company identified that, at the annual impairment assessment date (being the balance sheet date), the
carrying amount of the net assets of the Company of £63.9m was greater than its market capitalisation of £53.4m.
The CGU’s recoverable amount has historically been determined by its value in use, assessed by the estimated future cash flows
discounted to their present value using an appropriate pre-tax discount rate model. Due to the recent launch of the Company’s new
strategy, which involves a much more pro-active approach to market development and a focus on a few key markets, an assessment of
future cash flows based on reaching final investment decision on new GTL or BTL plants involved a particularly high level of judgement.
Consequently, a fair value less costs of disposal basis was adopted for the 31 December 2016 assessment.
The value for market capitalisation has been obtained by calculating the total value of the parent company’s equity based on the
AIM-listed shares of the parent company, adjusted for a control premium. This premium is an amount that a buyer is willing to pay
over the current market price of a publicly traded company in order to acquire a controlling share in that company. The control premium
estimate applied is a key assumption. Management have estimated a premium of 25%. A reduction in this assumption to 18% would
result in a material impairment of goodwill. In concluding on the impairment assessment, management have also considered information
from after the reporting period. This does not indicate that an impairment at the end of the reporting period was required. A review of
the market capitalisation after the reporting date was considered to be important in assessing the relative importance of the share
price at 31 December 2016. The market cap has increased in 2017, particularly in light of several Company announcements with respect
to achieving first product at the ENVIA GTL plant and the signing of a number of strategic partnership agreements. The current market
capitalisation of the Company is significantly in excess of the carrying amount of the net assets of the Company.
2015
Cost
At 1 January 2015
Additions
Disposals
Foreign exchange movement
At 31 December 2015
Accumulated amortisation
At 1 January 2015
Charge for the year
Disposals
Impairment
Foreign exchange movement
At 31 December 2015
Net book amount
At 31 December 2015
Goodwill
£’000
In-process
technology
£’000
Patents,
licence and
trademarks
£’000
Customer
contracts
£’000
Software
£’000
Total
£’000
5,958
–
–
775
6,733
–
–
–
–
–
–
20,610
–
–
919
21,529
1,328
28
–
–
–
1,356
1,995
393
(523)
62
1,927
528
152
(148)
–
15
547
1,473
–
–
–
1,473
–
–
–
1,473
–
1,473
6,733
20,173
1,380
–
328
2
(208)
6
128
161
72
(200)
–
3
36
92
30,364
395
(731)
1,762
31,790
2,017
252
(348)
1,473
18
3,412
28,378
18. Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost, net of depreciation and any provision for impairment. Cost includes the original
purchase price of the asset and the costs attributable to bringing the asset to working condition for its intended use. Depreciation is
provided on all property, plant and equipment at rates calculated to write off the cost, less estimated residual value, of each asset on
a straight-line basis over its expected useful life, which for plant and machinery is three to ten years. No depreciation is provided on
land or assets under construction.
Residual values and useful lives are reviewed annually. Values are estimated using benchmark prices at the balance sheet date; useful
lives are estimated based on management expectations of future project requirements and operational assessment of the state of
assets.
Assets are reviewed for impairment annually and also whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying value may not
be recoverable. To the extent the carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount, the difference is recorded as an expense in the Income
statement. The recoverable amount used for impairment testing is the higher of the value in use and fair value less costs of disposal.
For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are generally tested individually or at a CGU level which represents the lowest level for
which there are separately identifiable cash inflows which are largely independent of cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets.
Based on this assessment the recoverable amount was in excess of the carrying amount of intangible assets, and therefore an
impairment was not recorded (2015: £nil).
Expenditure funded by research partners is only capitalised where there are no significant rights acquired by the third party over the
asset and the asset has a clear enduring use beyond the specific funding project, these are regularly reviewed.
2016
Cost
At 1 January 2016
Additions
Disposals
Foreign exchange movement
At 31 December 2016
Accumulated amortisation
At 1 January 2016
Charge for the year
Disposals
Impairment
Foreign exchange movement
At 31 December 2016
Net book amount
At 31 December 2016
Goodwill
£’000
In-process
technology
£’000
Patents,
licence and
trademarks
£’000
Customer
contracts
£’000
Software
£’000
6,733
–
–
1,380
8,113
–
–
–
–
–
–
21,529
–
–
4,413
25,942
1,356
–
–
–
272
1,628
1,927
356
(301)
266
2,248
547
145
(88)
–
74
678
1,473
–
–
–
1,473
1,473
–
–
–
–
1,473
128
1
(40)
12
101
36
46
(20)
–
1
63
Total
£’000
31,790
357
(341)
6,071
37,877
3,412
191
(108)
–
347
3,842
8,113
24,314
1,570
–
38
34,035
2016
Cost
At 1 January 2016
Additions
Disposals
Transfers to plant and machinery
Foreign exchange
At 31 December 2016
Accumulated depreciation
At 1 January 2016
Charge for the year
Disposals
Foreign exchange
At 31 December 2016
Net book amount
At 31 December 2016
Assets under
construction
£’000
63
246
–
(222)
17
104
–
–
–
–
–
Land
£’000
1,104
–
–
–
226
1,330
–
–
–
–
–
Plant and
machinery
£’000
10,118
45
(95)
222
1,910
12,200
5,778
1,132
(94)
1,181
7,997
104
1,330
4,203
Total
£’000
11,285
291
(95)
–
2,153
13,634
5,778
1,132
(94)
1,181
7,997
5,637
60 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 61
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
18. Property, plant and equipment (continued)
2015
Cost
At 1 January 2015
Additions
Disposals
Transfers to plant and machinery
Foreign exchange
At 31 December 2015
Accumulated depreciation
At 1 January 2015
Charge for the year
Disposals
Foreign exchange
At 31 December 2015
Net book amount
At 31 December 2015
Assets under
construction
£’000
778
224
–
(954)
15
63
–
–
–
–
–
63
Land
£’000
1,053
–
–
–
51
1,104
–
–
–
–
–
Plant and
machinery
£’000
7,827
2,038
(1,082)
954
381
10,118
5,593
1,025
(1,077)
237
5,778
1,104
4,340
Total
£’000
9,658
2,262
(1,082)
–
447
11,285
5,593
1,025
(1,077)
237
5,778
5,507
As at 31 December 2016, the Company had entered into contractual commitments for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment
amounting to £12,000 (2015: £23,000).
19. Investments in subsidiaries
On acquisition, subsidiaries are accounted for in the consolidated accounts using the purchase method. The cost is measured as the
fair value of the assets acquired, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange, irrespective of
minority interest. For acquisitions completed prior to 1 January 2010, costs directly attributable to the acquisition are included in this
calculation, for subsequent acquisitions they are expensed. The excess of cost over fair value is recorded as goodwill. If cost is less than
fair value, the difference is recognised in the Income statement. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is
transferred to the Company.
Investments in subsidiaries are held by the parent company at historical cost less impairment. The net investment that the parent
company has in its subsidiary undertakings is its interest in the net assets of that subsidiary. The inclusion of long-term loans and
receivables (Loans to subsidiaries) as part of the net investment in the subsidiary undertaking (Investment in subsidiaries) is determined
by the fact that settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future. All loans to subsidiaries by the parent company
meet this criterion.
The carrying amounts of the parent company’s Investments in subsidiaries are reviewed at each balance sheet date, or when events or
changes in circumstance indicate their carrying value may not be recoverable, to determine whether there is any indication of impairment.
If such an indication exists, the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated. To the extent the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable
amount, the difference is recorded as an expense in the Income statement. The recoverable amount used for impairment testing is the
higher of the value in use and fair value less costs of disposal. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are generally assessed
individually or at a CGU level, which represents the lowest level for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows that are largely
independent of cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets.
As set out in note 17, an impairment assessment was carried out on the Company’s intangible assets and no impairment was indicated.
The parent company used the same basis for calculating the recoverable amount to determine the total value of the three subsidiaries
held by the parent company, based on the judgement that there is limited value attributable to the parent company, as a non-trading
holding company. The parent company has both equity and debt investments in the three subsidiaries, which are compared to the
recoverable amount. On this basis, the impairment assessment indicated that the carrying value of the investments in subsidiaries was
higher than the recoverable amount, determined by fair value less costs of disposal. As a result, an impairment of £65,716,000 (2015: £nil)
was recognised. This impairment eliminated on consolidation.
An impairment loss in respect of Investments in subsidiaries is reversed if the subsequent increase in recoverable amount can be related
objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised or if there has been a change in the estimate used to determine
the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed that which
would have been determined if no impairment loss had been recognised.
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains and losses on transactions are eliminated in the consolidated accounts.
Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with Company policies.
Critical estimates and judgements
In assessing whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired, an entity shall consider, as a minimum, a number of indicators
of potential impairment. The parent company identified that at the annual impairment assessment date, being the balance sheet date,
the carrying amount of the net assets of the parent company of £67.4m was more than its market capitalisation of £53.5m. The critical
estimates and judgements applied in calculating the recoverable amount are set out in note 17.
Loan to
subsidiaries
£’000
Capital
contributions to
subsidiaries
£’000
89,369
(2,792)
–
(46,973)
8,166
47,770
36,920
–
884
(18,743)
–
19,061
2016
Total
investment in
subsidiaries
£’000
126,289
(2,792)
884
(65,716)
8,166
66,831
Loan to
subsidiaries
£’000
Capital
contributions to
subsidiaries
£’000
93,820
(3,655)
–
–
(796)
89,369
34,932
–
1,988
–
–
36,920
Velocys plc
Investments in subsidiaries
At 1 January
Movement in loans
Capital contributions
Impairment of subsidiaries
Foreign exchange
At 31 December
The parent company has direct investments in the following subsidiary undertakings.
Subsidiary undertakings
Velocys Technologies Limited*
Country of
incorporation or principal
business address
England and Wales
Principal activity
Design and development
of catalysts, and exploitation of
platform catalyst technologies
Velocys (USA Holdings) LLC**
Ohio, USA
Holding company for US subsidiaries
Oxford Catalysts Trustees Limited*
England and Wales
Holds assets and makes distributions
in respect of employee remuneration
The following companies are subsidiaries of the Company whose immediate parent is not Velocys plc.
Subsidiary undertakings
Velocys, Inc.**
Velocys Project Solutions, LLC***
Ashtabula Energy, LLC***
Country of
incorporation or principal
business address
Delaware, USA
Delaware, USA
Delaware, USA
Principal activity
Design, development and exploitation
of its microchannel technologies
Project development of
smaller scale GTL plants
Project development of smaller scale
GTL plant in Ashtabula, Ohio
YellowRock GTL Services, LLC**
Delaware, USA
Secondment of employees to plants
VMH Assets LLC**
JAB Land-Ashtabula**
Ohio, USA
Ohio USA
Holds manufacturing assets in Ohio
Holds land for smaller scale GTL plant
in Ashtabula Ohio
Westlake GTL, LLC**
Delaware, USA
Project development of smaller
scale GTL plant
2015
Total
investment in
subsidiaries
£’000
128,752
(3,655)
1,988
–
(796)
126,289
% Holding
(all ordinary
share capital)
100
100
100
% Holding
(all ordinary
share capital)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
The following are dormant subsidiaries.
Dormant subsidiaries
Oxford Catalysts UK Limited*
Bradford GTL LLC***
Susquehanna GTL LLC***
Incorporated
England and Wales
Delaware, USA
Delaware, USA
Immediate parent
% Holding
Velocys plc
Velocys Project Solutions, LLC
Velocys Project Solutions, LLC
100
100
100
Located at 115e Olympic Avenue, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4SA, UK.
*
** Located at 7950 Corporate Boulevard, Plain City, OH 43064, USA.
*** Located at 2603 Augusta Drive, Suite 1175, Houston, TX 77057, USA.
62 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 63
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
20. Investments
Investments consist solely of Velocys’ holding in ENVIA Energy, LLC (ENVIA) located at 1021 Main Street, Suite 1000 Houston, TX 77002.
ENVIA is a US company and is the holding company for the project located in Oklahoma (the ENVIA project). The Company first invested
in ENVIA in 2014 as entry into a joint venture to develop GTL plants in the US using a combination of renewable biogas (including landfill
gas) and natural gas. The first of these plants, ENVIA Oklahoma City produced its first product in 2017. A description of the ENVIA project
is available in the Strategic report on pages 8-11.
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other
categories of financial instruments – see note 28 for a description of these classes and the accounting policy for available-for-sale
financial assets. At 31 December 2015, the investment was recorded at cost, which was also considered to be fair value.
At the end of January 2016, Velocys entered into a financing arrangement with ENVIA under which it contributed additional equity finance
of $2,587,000 and committed to provide loan finance of up to $9,310,000. This senior loan note bears interest at 10%, and is repayable on
31 December 2019 with an option to extend to 31 December 2020. As at 31 December 2016, one draw down on this facility had been
made by ENVIA in the amount of $400,000 (see note 21). As a result of the new funding arrangement, Velocys increased its ownership
share and was awarded additional voting rights, taking its share of voting rights to 28%.
Associates are all entities over which the Company has significant influence but not control, generally accompanying a shareholding of
between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. From this point the investment has been recognised as an Investment in associate, accounted
for under the equity method. This judgement was based on the level of influence Velocys holds in ENVIA, including voting rights exceeding
20% and a seat on ENVIA’s board. Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting from the date on
which it becomes an associate. Under the equity method, a cost approach is followed whereby the cost of all purchases are accumulated
(including transaction costs) to determine the amount of the investment. The notional purchase price allocation (including goodwill
arising on the purchase of the additional stake) is calculated using fair value information at the date when the additional interest
is acquired. Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the cost of the investment over the Company’s share of the net fair value of the
investee’s identifiable assets and liabilities and included in the carrying amount of the investment. The allocation was fair valued, which
gave rise to goodwill of £320,000; this has been included in Investment in the Investment in associate table below. Velocys’ share of losses
since the end of January 2016, arising from administration costs incurred by ENVIA ahead of the start-up of its first GTL plant, has been
reflected in the Income statement. The carrying amount of the investment is adjusted to recognise the investor’s share of the change in
net assets of the investee after the date of acquisition.
The Company’s share of post-acquisition profit or loss is recognised in the Income statement. There are no post-acquisition movements
in Other comprehensive income in the Company’s investments in associates. Distributions received from an associate reduce the carrying
amount of the investment.
The Company determines at each reporting date whether there is any objective evidence that the investment in the associate is impaired.
If this is the case, the Company calculates the amount of impairment as the difference between the recoverable amount of the associate
and its carrying value and recognises the amount adjacent to share of profit/(loss) of associates in the income statement. See note 17
for impairment of non-financial assets.
Gains and losses resulting from upstream and downstream transactions between the Company and its associate are recognised in the
financial statements only to the extent of unrelated investors’ interests in the associates. Unrealised losses are eliminated unless the
transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of associates have been changed where
necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Company. There have been no dilution gains and losses arising in
investments in associates.
Critical estimates and judgements
On acquisition of significant influence, the Company has recognised 9.7% of the net fair value of ENVIA’s identifiable assets and
liabilities in its investment in ENVIA and, for the period from such acquisition to 31 December 2016, recognised 9.8% as its share of
post-acquisition losses in ENVIA. These percentages differ to both the Company’s proportion of ownership units held in ENVIA and its
proportion of voting units, which are outlined above. They are considered more appropriate measures of the Company’s economic interest
in ENVIA at both acquisition and for the period ending 31 December 2016, where the distribution of both ENVIA’s identifiable assets and
liabilities and its net losses is defined by the LLC agreement agreed with each of the other parties that hold ownership units in ENVIA.
The investment is denominated in US dollars; in 2015 it was considered to be an available-for-sale asset.
Company
Available-for-sale investment
At 1 January
Investment
Foreign exchange
Movement to associate
At 31 December
Company
Investment in associate
At 1 January
Movement from available-for-sale
Investment
Share of loss
Foreign exchange
At 31 December
2016
£’000
3,375
–
–
(3,375)
–
2016
£’000
–
3,375
1,938
(306)
858
5,865
2015
£’000
1,711
1,535
129
–
3,375
2015
£’000
–
–
–
–
–
–
Summarised financial information for ENVIA
Set out below is the unaudited summarised financial information for ENVIA. The information below reflects the amounts presented in
the financial statements of ENVIA adjusted for differences in accounting policies between the Company and ENVIA. ENVIA financial
statements are not prepared under IFRS but management does not consider US GAAP to be materially different from IFRS for this
purpose.
ENVIA Energy, LLC
Summarised balance sheet
Current assets
Non-current assets
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Summarised statement of comprehensive income
Revenue
Loss from continuing operations
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income
The Company’s interest in associate was calculated as follows.
Fair value as at recognition of investment as associate
Investment (9.7%)
Loss for the period
Investment (9.8%)
Goodwill
Foreign exchange
Carrying value
2016
(unaudited)
£’000
5,066
63,303
(5,716)
(381)
–
(3,155)
–
(3,155)
2016
£’000
51,643
4,993
(3,155)
(306)
320
858
5,865
64 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 65
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
21. Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables
Trade receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method,
less provision for impairment. A provision is established when there is objective evidence that the Company will not be able to collect
all amounts due according to the original terms. Significant financial difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter
bankruptcy or financial reorganisation, and default or delinquency in payments (more than 30 days overdue) are considered indicators
that the trade receivable is impaired.
The amount of the provision is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows,
discounted at the original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through an allowance account, and the
amount of the loss is recognised in Cost of sales in the Income statement. When a receivable is uncollectible, it is written off against the
allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against Cost of sales.
Company
Non-current
Loan receivable
Total
2016
£’000
325
325
2015
£’000
–
–
Velocys has committed to provide up to US$9,310,000 to ENVIA through a senior loan note due on 31 December 2019 and bearing a 10%
interest rate, with an optional extension to 31 December 2020 with prior notice. As at 31 December 2016, one draw down on this facility
had been made by ENVIA in the amount of £325,000 ($400,000). See note 20.
Company
Current
Trade receivables
Prepayments and accrued income
Other receivables
Total
Parent company
Current
Prepayments and accrued income
Other receivables
Total
2016
£’000
397
371
43
811
2016
£’000
31
–
31
2015
£’000
4
324
583
911
2015
£’000
15
17
32
The fair value of trade and other receivables is not materially different to the book value above (2015: not materially different). The trade
receivables hold a low credit risk. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of each class of
receivable plus cash balances held. The Company does not hold any collateral as security (2015: £nil).
As at 31 December 2016 Company trade receivables of £249,000 (2015: £4,000) were past due but not impaired. The aging analysis for the
2016 amounts past the due date, which were received in full in 2017, is as follows.
Company
Up to three months
Total
2016
£’000
249
249
2015
£’000
4
4
The Company’s trade receivables outstanding at year end represent approximately 102 days’ sales (2015: 1 day). These are existing
customers with no history of default. The parent company had no trade receivables at 31 December 2016 (2015: £nil).
The Company believes that the full amount of trade receivables recognised is recoverable. At 31 December 2016, the parent company had
no overdue trade receivables (2015: £nil). The other classes within trade and other receivables do not contain impaired assets (2015: £nil).
Trade and other receivables are denominated in the following currencies:
Company
UK sterling
US dollars
Total
2016
£’000
224
587
811
2015
£’000
233
678
911
22. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realisable value less provision for impairment. Cost is determined on a first-in, first-out
basis and includes transport and handling costs. In the case of manufactured products, cost includes all direct expenditure including
production overheads. Where necessary, provision is made for obsolete, slow-moving and defective inventories. Items purchased for use
in externally funded research and development projects are expensed to that contract immediately. Items held for the Company’s own
development are also expensed when acquired. Items purchased for ongoing commercial sale are held in inventory and expensed when
used or sold.
Company
Raw materials and consumables
Finished goods
Total
2016
£’000
95
1,366
1,461
2015
£’000
77
1,316
1,393
In 2016, the Company wrote off £104,000 of the value of an inventoried reactor as a reflection of the fact that its selling price is below cost.
The book value of the inventoried reactor is £311,000.
23. Short term investments, cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks and other short-term highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less. Bank accounts held which have an original maturity of more than three months, or which are
subject to significant restrictions over access are shown as short term investments or other financial assets with appropriate disclosure
of the related terms. See note 28.
Company
Short term bank deposits
Cash at bank and in hand
Total cash and cash equivalents
2016
£’000
–
18,744
18,744
Both short term investments, and cash and cash equivalents, are denominated in UK sterling and in US dollars, as follows:
UK sterling denominated
Company
Short term bank deposits
Cash at bank and in hand
Total UK sterling denominated
US dollar denominated
Company
Short term bank deposits
Cash at bank and in hand
Total US dollar denominated
The parent company has no cash or cash equivalents (2015: £nil).
2016
£’000
–
7,114
7,114
2016
£’000
–
11,630
11,630
2015
£’000
3,000
34,736
37,736
2015
£’000
3,000
23,570
26,570
2015
£’000
–
11,166
11,166
66 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 67
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
24. Trade and other payables: current
Provisions for claims are recognised when the Company has a present constructive or legal obligation as a result of past events, and it is
probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and the amount can be reliably estimated. See note 28.
Company
Trade payables
Other taxation and social security
Accruals
Deferred income
Deferred consideration
Total
2016
£’000
722
51
991
508
–
2,272
2015
£’000
1,372
14
3,265
2,638
91
7,380
The parent company has trade and other payables of £72,000 (2015: £140,000), all of which are accruals.
Due to their short maturity, the fair value of trade and other payables are not considered to be materially different to their carrying values,
based on discounted cash flows.
All trade payables are due in 60 days or less (2015: 60 days or less).
Deferred consideration relates to the acquisition of VPS in 2014, under which a number of ‘holdback’ shares were designated to cover
post-acquisition adjustments; these shares were issued during 2016.
25. Trade and other payables: non-current
Company
Accruals
Deferred income
Total
2016
£’000
110
1,233
1,343
2015
£’000
65
1,262
1,327
The fair values of trade and other payables are not considered to be materially different to their carrying values.
Deferred income for 2016 includes funds received for catalyst to be earned over a two-year period commencing at the start-up of the
ENVIA reactors.
26. Borrowings
Maturity of borrowings for the Company is as follows.
Company
Within one year
Within two to five years
Total
2016
£’000
323
593
916
2015
£’000
288
759
1,047
The majority of Borrowings relates to a loan entered into on 1 December 2009 by Velocys plc’s wholly owned subsidiary, Velocys, Inc. with
the State of Ohio (the State) allowing Velocys, Inc. to borrow up to $2.25m to fund qualified capital projects for research and development
projects. All such projects were required to be completed by 31 August 2012 and have 25% of costs funded by Velocys Inc. The interest rate
for the loan is 2.00% per annum with a service fee of 0.25% on the principal balance. The Company’s fixed rate borrowings are carried at
amortised cost. They are therefore not subject to interest rate risk as defined in IFRS 7, since neither the carrying amount nor the future
cash flows will fluctuate because of a change in market interest rates. The loan is repaid to the State using a blended payment schedule
as follows.
For the first five years of the loan, the principal is paid in consecutive monthly instalments based upon an original amortisation over
20 years with any interest accrued during that particular month.
For the remaining term of the loan, the principal is paid in consecutive monthly instalments based upon the remaining term of the loan
(five years) with any interest accrued during that particular month.
The loan is secured by all plant and machinery acquired using the loan proceeds as well as a guarantee of payment provided by the parent
company. The gross book value of the capital projects secured is £2,672,000 (2015: £2,217,000). The loan was fully drawn down in 2012.
After repayments of principal, the amount outstanding on the loan as at 31 December 2016 is £880,000 (2015: £964,000).
All remaining Borrowings of £36,000 (2015: £83,000) arise from finance lease obligations. The fair values of Borrowings are not considered
to be materially different to their carrying values based on discounted cash flows.
27. Derivative financial instruments
The Company is funded in sterling but buys US dollars to fund its operations in the United States, which exposes it to foreign exchange
risk. This is mitigated through the use of forward contracts at fixed rates of exchange with fixed maturity dates. Derivative financial
instruments are initially recognised at fair value on the date the derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at
fair value at each balance sheet date using values determined indirectly from quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.
This is a level 2 fair value measurement. Gains and losses against the US dollar exchange rate as at 31 December 2016 are recognised
in Finance income in the Income statement. At 31 December 2016 the notional principal amounts of the outstanding forward foreign
exchange contracts were £2,714,000 (2015: £3,217,000), and the revalued amounts were £3,251,000 (2015: £3,373,000). The unrealised
foreign exchange gain on these contracts as at 31 December 2016 was £537,000 (2015: £156,000). All the outstanding contracts will
mature during 2017.
28. Financial instruments
Financial assets
The Company classifies its financial assets in the following categories: at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables
and available-for sale. The classification depends on the nature of the asset and the purpose for which the assets were acquired.
Financial assets are classified upon initial recognition.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market.
The Company’s principal financial asset is Cash and cash equivalents. In 2015 it also held short-term investments, which are cash
deposits on fixed terms of interest for more than three months (see note 23).
Loans and receivables also includes Trade receivables and Other receivables (see note 21), which are classified as current assets, and
the loan to ENVIA (see notes 19 and 20), which is classified as non-current as its maturity is more than 12 months from the balance
sheet date. Loans and receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective
interest method, less provision for impairment.
Assets at fair value through profit and loss
Financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognised at fair value, and transaction costs are expensed
in the Consolidated income statement.
For Velocys, this category includes only derivative financial instruments (see note 27). The Company enters into forward contracts
to mitigate the risk of needing to fund its US operations in dollars. An asset is recognised when there is a foreign exchange gain upon
re-measurement of the contract. The Company hasn’t taken a forward position further than 12 months from the reporting date.
Therefore all assets have been recognised as current. The gain or loss on re-measurement to fair value is recognised immediately
in the Income statement, in Net finance income.
Available for sale
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other
categories. They are included in non-current assets unless the investment matures or management intends to dispose of the assets
within 12 months after the balance sheet date. Available for sale financial assets are subsequently carried at fair value; movements
are recorded in the Statement of comprehensive income.
In 2015 the Company’s investment in ENVIA was recognised as an Available for sale financial asset. At the end of January 2016
the investment and voting interest were increased and was subsequently recognised as an Investment in associate (see note 20).
Investments are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial assets not carried at fair value through profit
or loss.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. In 2015 and 2016 the
Company had only one category of liability.
Financial liabilities at amortised cost
Financial liabilities at amortised cost includes Trade payables, all of which are current liabilities (see note 25), Borrowings and Finance
leases (see note 26). Trade payables are stated at fair value and subsequently held at amortised cost using the effective interest
method. Under Borrowings, interest bearing loans and overdrafts are initially recorded at the fair value of proceeds received net of direct
issue costs, and thereafter at amortised cost. Finance charges, including premiums payable on settlement or redemption and direct
issue costs, are recognised in the income statement using the effective interest method and are added to the carrying amount of the
instrument to the extent that they are not settled in the period in which they arise.
All of the above financial assets and liabilities are level 2 fair value measurements.
68 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 69
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
28. Financial instruments (continued)
Financial risks
The activities of Velocys expose it to a number of financial risks, which are dealt with specifically below.
Interest rates
Variations in interest rates affect only Velocys’ cash holdings, as its borrowing is payable at a fixed rate. As far as the cash flow forecast
allows for certainty, funds are placed on fixed rate deposits. The effect of interest rates on exchange rates is not anticipated.
Financing
The Company’s cash usage is significant versus prospective future cashflows (particularly in the short term) and Velocys is reliant on
the support of a small group of major shareholders. The timing of cashflows is difficult to predict given the Company’s nascent strategy.
The Board recognises that further funding will be needed. Note 2 discusses uncertainties surrounding the extent and composition of
future funding. The Company believes that equity remains the preferred structure to support the business as a going concern in the near
term, but will keep this under review. The recently announced fundraise included the issue of loan notes that are convertible into equity.
As such, in management’s view, they have the key characteristics of equity. Velocys continues to take measures to preserve cash in order
to protect against unforeseen events.
Equity forms the basis of the Company’s capital. Its objectives when managing this capital are:
To secure its ability to continue as a going concern.
To keep its cost of capital low through an optimised capital structure.
To preserve sufficient funds to protect it against unforeseen events and risks.
To be in a position to take advantage of opportunities that can deliver a return to shareholders.
The Company’s revenue stream relies on projects incorporating its technology securing project finance. The Company’s strategy is to take
a pro-active role in this process. It is actively engaging with banks and financial advisors with high levels of expertise in project financing
to support the financing plans for the types of projects it is developing.
Exchange rates
A significant proportion of commercial activity and R&D costs are US-dollar denominated. Where possible, revenue is receipted in
US dollars to act as a natural hedge against this exposure. Additionally, a proportion of liquid assets is held in US dollars, and future
exchange rate uncertainty is managed through the use of forward contracts at fixed rates of exchange.
The use of financial derivatives is governed by Company policies, which are approved by the Board of directors, and which provide a set
of written principles for the management of these risks. At present Velocys makes use of financial derivatives only in the management
of the foreign exchange exposure arising from funding its US operations.
The consolidated financial statements contain significant US-dollar denominated intangible assets relating to the acquisition of Velocys,
Inc., which give rise to movements in reserves when exchange rates fluctuate. These movements are not hedged as they do not impact the
cash position.
Financial assets are as follows.
Company
Assets as per balance sheet
Derivative financial instruments
Trade and other receivables excluding non-financial assets
Short term investments – funds held on deposit
Cash and cash equivalents
Total
Company
Assets as per balance sheet
Available-for-sale financial assets
Derivative financial instruments
Trade and other receivables excluding non-financial assets
Short term investments – funds held on deposit
Cash and cash equivalents
Total
The credit risk of short term investments and cash and cash equivalents is summarised in the following table.
The table below illustrates the Company’s sensitivity to changes in the US dollar exchange rate at the balance sheet date. The analysis
covers only financial assets and liabilities.
Short-term bank deposits, cash at bank and in hand
GBP:USD exchange rate +/- 10%
Income
statement
£’000
1,421
2016
Equity
£’000
1,421
Income
statement
£’000
1,157
2015
Equity
£’000
1,157
Aa2
Aa3
A1
A2
A3
Total
2016
%
3
47
47
–
3
£’000
663
8,817
8,747
–
517
18,744
Liquidity
The Company maintains sufficient cash balances to meet anticipated requirements. Cash flow forecasts are regularly reviewed,
cash balances are held immediately available as necessary, and surplus funds are placed on time deposits of varying duration.
Credit
The Company’s credit risk is primarily attributable to its trade receivables, which are concentrated in a small number of high value
customer accounts. This risk is managed by carrying out relevant financial checks on customers, and where necessary, requiring letters
of credit or advance payments.
The credit risk of liquid funds is limited through a Company treasury policy, maintained to ensure that liquid assets are only placed with
highly-rated institutions, and that the spread of such assets restricts exposure to any one counterparty. Risk is assessed using an external
credit rating agency’s long-term ratings.
31 December 2016
Loans and
receivables
£’000
Assets at fair
value through
profit and loss
£’000
Available
for sale
£’000
–
765
–
18,744
19,509
537
–
–
–
537
–
–
–
–
–
Total
£’000
537
765
–
18,744
20,046
31 December 2015
Loans and
receivables
£’000
Assets at fair
value through
profit and loss
£’000
–
–
587
3,000
34,736
38,323
–
156
–
–
–
156
Available
for sale
£’000
3,375
–
–
–
–
3,375
£’000
3,447
5,698
15,044
12,034
1,513
37,736
Total
£’000
3,375
156
587
3,000
34,736
41,854
2015
%
9
15
40
32
4
70 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 71
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
28. Financial instruments (continued)
Financial liabilities are as follows.
Company
Liabilities as per balance sheet
Borrowings
Trade and other payables excluding non-financial liabilities
Finance lease liabilities
Total
Company
Liabilities as per balance sheet
Borrowings
Trade and other payables excluding non-financial liabilities
Finance lease liabilities
Total
The aging of financial liabilities is as follows.
Company
Within one year
Within two to five years
Total
Financial assets of the parent company are as follows. The parent company has no financial liabilities.
Parent company
Assets as per balance sheet
Trade and other receivables excluding non-financial assets
Parent company
Assets as per balance sheet
Trade and other receivables excluding non-financial assets
Parent company loans and receivables are all intercompany loans.
31 December 2016
Financial liabilities
at amortised cost
£’000
880
722
36
1,638
31 December 2015
Financial liabilities
at amortised cost
£’000
964
1,372
83
2,419
2015
£’000
1,660
759
2,419
31 December 2016
Loans and receivables
£’000
47,770
31 December 2015
Loans and receivables
£’000
89,369
2016
£’000
1,045
593
1,638
29. Called up share capital and reserves
Called up share capital
Company and parent company
At 1 January 2015
Employee share options scheme: Shares issued
including 1p exercise price options
At 31 December 2015
Employee share options scheme: Shares issued
including 1p exercise price options
Holdback shares
At 31 December 2016
*
All shares have been issued, authorised and fully paid.
Number of
shares*
(thousands)
141,896
27
141,923
1,912
41
143,876
Ordinary
shares
£’000
1,419
–
1,419
19
–
1,438
Share
premium
£’000
149,225
(28)
149,197
(13)
91
149,275
A total of 11,811,991 (2015: 15,613,701) options to subscribe for ordinary shares of Velocys plc have been granted and are outstanding
at 31 December 2016 under the employee options schemes operated within the Company and contracts for options granted to a limited
number of consultants. Details are given in note 15.
On 25 June 2014 the Company acquired Velocys Project Solutions, LLC. A number of holdback shares was designated to cover
adjustments in the period after acquisition. The remaining balance of 41,644 shares was issued during 2016.
Reserves
Foreign exchange reserve relates to the exchange differences arising from the retranslation of the results and opening net assets of
foreign subsidiaries. Changes in the reserve are included in other comprehensive income. The Company’s foreign exchange reserve
was a credit balance of £7,051,000 (2015: a debit balance of £282,000).
The share based payment reserve records the IFRS 2 charge for equity settled share based payment awards. At 31 December 2016 the
Company’s and parent company’s share-based payment reserves were both £15,843,000 (2015: £15,362,000).
30. Commitments
Leases in which a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating
leases. Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) are charged to the income statement
on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
The Company leases certain property, plant and equipment. Leases under which the Company incurs substantially all the risks and
rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalised on commencement of the lease at the lower of
the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease payments.
Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance charges so as to achieve a constant rate on the finance balance
outstanding. The corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges, are included in other long-term payables. The interest element
of the finance cost is also charged to the income statement in Finance costs over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic
rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. The property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases
is depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the asset and the lease term.
Operating lease commitments
The Company leases various offices under non-cancellable operating lease agreements. The lease terms are between two and five years
and the majority of lease agreements are renewable at the end of the lease period at market rate.
Company
Future aggregate minimum lease payments under non-cancellable property leases:
– Within one year
– Between one and five years
– After more than five years
Total
2016
£’000
489
1,312
194
1,995
2015
£’000
408
1,217
415
2,040
72 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016 73
Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
Company
Future commitments under non-cancellable operating plant and equipment leases:
– Within one year
– Between one and five years
Total
Capital commitments are disclosed in note 18.
2016
£’000
2
7
9
2015
£’000
2
3
5
The Company is committed to make available additional loan funding to ENVIA of £7.2m ($9.3m), which is repayable by 31 December 2020.
The parent company does not have any commitments (2015: £nil).
31. Pension arrangements
The Company operates a number of defined contribution schemes for which the pension cost charge for the year amounted to £314,000
(2015: £326,000).
32. Related party transactions
The parent company has the following amounts due from its subsidiaries:
Balances with subsidiary companies
Velocys Technologies Limited
Velocys (USA Holdings) LLC
Velocys, Inc.
Total due from subsidiaries
2016
£’000
21,170
5,205
21,395
47,770
2015
£’000
58,637
6,191
24,541
89,369
All amounts are unsecured and have no fixed date of repayment. All intercompany loans are charged at 5%.
For 2016 the Company provided engineering services totalling £619,000 to ENVIA, an associate in which the Company has ownership and
voting rights as detailed in note 20. At 31 December 2016 the Company had a receivable due from ENVIA of £145,000. During 2016 Velocys
committed to provide up to $9,310,000 to ENVIA through a senior loan note, which bears interest of 10%, and is due for repayment on 31
December 2019 with an optional extension to 31 December 2020. As at 31 December 2016, one draw down on this facility had been made
by ENVIA in the amount of £325,000 ($400,000 - see note 20). In 2015 ENVIA was not a related party.
The Company provided engineering services of £110,000 to Norma Investments Limited, which is the parent company of Ervington
Investments, the largest shareholder in Velocys plc with a holding of 29.5% at 31 December 2016.
Oxford Catalysts Trustees Limited
At the time of exercising their share options, executives of the Company may apply to the employee benefit trust managed by Oxford
Catalysts Trustees Limited for a distribution in respect of the exercise value of their options. The trustees then request a contribution
from the Company in respect of the grant made. The total value of funds contributed by the Company to Oxford Catalysts Trustees Limited
during the year was £13,300 (2015: £nil).
33. Post-financial position events
The following events occurred after 31 December 2016.
On 17 January 2017 the Company announced that it had signed a memorandum of understanding with Morimatsu, the Company’s
preferred supplier of module fabrication and engineering. Velocys proceeded, on 3 March, to confirm that it had reached a definitive
agreement with Morimatsu.
On 26 January 2017 a strategic alliance was announced with TRI, the Company’s preferred supplier of gasification systems for its
biomass-to-liquids (BTL) plants.
On 6 February 2017 it was announced that first product had been made at ENVIA Energy’s GTL plant in Oklahoma City.
Velocys announced on 26 April 2017 that Mark Chatterji had stepped down from his position as Non-Executive Director.
The Company announced on 15 May 2017 that it had secured £10m of additional funding.
In May 2017 Velocys agreed to provide further loan finance to ENVIA of $3.4 million; this did not affect the Company’s share of ownership
or voting rights.
74 Velocys Annual report and accounts 2016
Design & production
www.carrkamasa.co.uk
Directors, secretary and advisors to the Company
Registered office
115e Olympic Avenue
Milton Park
Abingdon
Oxfordshire
OX14 4SA
Velocys plc registration no.
05712187
Directors
Pierre Jungels (Non-Executive Chairman)
David Pummell (Chief Executive Officer)
Susan Robertson (Chief Financial Officer)
Paul Schubert (Chief Operating Officer)
Julian West (Senior Independent Director)
Ross Allonby (Non-Executive Director)
Sandy Shaw (Non-Executive Director)
Company secretary
Jeremy Gorman
Nominated advisors and joint brokers
Numis Securities Limited
The London Stock Exchange Building
10 Paternoster Square
St Pauls
London
EC4M 7LT
Joint brokers
Canaccord Genuity Limited
88 Wood Street
London
EC2V 7QR
Registrars
Capita Registrars Ltd
The Registry
34 Beckenham Road
Beckenham
Kent
BR3 4TU
Bankers
Barclays Bank Plc
Wytham Court
11 West Way
Oxford
OX2 0JB
Public relations
Camarco
107 Cheapside
London
EC2V 6DN
Independent auditors
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
3 Forbury Place
23 Forbury Road
Reading
Berkshire
RG1 3JH