2005 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Highlights Operations (in thousands) Total Revenues Net Income Cash Flows from Operating Activities Funds from Operations (FFO)(1) Per Share Diluted Earnings Per Share Diluted Funds from Operations Per Share Dividends Declared Per Share Weighted Average Listed Shares Outstanding (Diluted) Stock Data Price Range (January 2, 2005 through December 31, 2005) Number of Shareholders Funds from Operations (in thousands)(1) Net income Gain on sale of real estate Funds from Operations of equity investees in excess of equity income Depreciation, amortization, deferred taxes, stock compensation and other non-cash charges Funds from Operations applicable to minority investees in excess of minority income Straight-line rent adjustments Impairment loss on real estate Funds from Operations Year Ended December 31, 2005 $ $ $ $ $ 174,117 48,604 52,707 98,571 1.25 2.53 1.79 39,020,801 23.85-35.94 27,599 48,604 (12,474) 10,358 27,094 (602) 3,821 21,770 98,571 (1) W. P. Carey’s 2005 Annual Report contains references to W. P. Carey’s definition of funds from operations (FFO), which is a non-GAAP financial measure. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) defines funds from operations as net income computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of property, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. W. P. Carey calculates its FFO in accordance with this definition and then makes adjust- ments to add back certain non-cash charges to earnings, such as the amortization of intangibles, stock compensation and impairment charges on real estate, resulting in its FFO. W. P. Carey considers its definition of FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance because, by excluding these non-cash charges, it can be a helpful tool to assist in the comparison of the operating performance of W. P. Carey’s real estate between periods, or as compared to different companies. W. P. Carey’s definition of FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of its operating performance or to net cash provided by operating activities as a measure of its liquidity. FFO and adjusted FFO disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to W. P. Carey’s FFO calculation. FRONT COVER: Illustration represents countries where the W. P. Carey Group owns and manages properties. Countries include: United States, Canada, Mexico, Ireland, United Kingdom, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Sweden, Poland, Finland and Thailand. W. P. Carey & Co. LLC Dear Fellow Shareholders We are pleased to report that W. P. Carey had another successful year in three primary areas: Assets Under Management 2005 was a year of growth in assets under management as we continued to be successful in finding appropriate investment opportunities in the United States, Europe and Asia. Despite a highly competitive environment, we were able to structure and close 28 sale-leaseback investments totaling $865 million. The acquisitions consisted of corporate facilities in 23 different industries and five countries. Just over half of the dollar amount invested was in properties outside the United States, reflecting the attractive risk-return opportunities that exist around the globe. All of our investments in 2005 were made on behalf of our Corporate Property Associates (CPA®) series of managed funds. The total value of assets under management in these publicly held, non-traded net lease real estate investment trusts (REITs) at the end of 2005 was approximately $6.5 billion. Since 2000, our growth in assets under management has more than tripled, reflecting an annual compound growth rate of 29%. Total Assets Under Management in CPA® Series of Funds $ in millions 6,467 5,508 4,432 3,408 2,340 1,779 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Portfolio Management We have been very active in managing the W. P. Carey Group’s portfolio – which includes both the CPA® series of funds as well as our directly-owned assets – through selective asset sales, lease restructurings, refinancings and expansions, and have harvested the fruit of this activity. Today, occupancy of the W. P. Carey Group’s 93 million square foot portfolio is close to 99%. This is rather extraordinary for our industry and reflects the continued focus we place on maximizing returns for our investors once the investments have been made. Performance of CPA® Funds There are currently four active CPA® funds that W. P. Carey manages – CPA®:12, CPA®:14, CPA®:15 and CPA®:16 – Global. Eleven of the 15 CPA® programs have gone full cycle to liquidity since the series began in 1979. Our consistent focus on creating value has produced attractive results for our CPA® investors. We believe that if we do our job well for our investors in our managed funds, then we will benefit alongside them as their investment manager. The following summarizes last year’s investment performance for our CPA® funds, excluding CPA®:16 – Global, which is currently in its offering and investment stage: Distributions We have managed to create attractive income streams for the CPA® series of funds during a relatively low interest rate market, as shown in the chart below. Part of the difference in distribution rates is based upon a successively lower yield environment as the programs were offered and invested. CPA® Distributions $10.00/share 8.27% 7.70% 6.46% CPA®: 12 CPA®: 14 CPA®: 15 Net Asset Value In addition, Net Asset Value (“NAV”) of each of the funds in 2005 had increases ranging from 2.5% to 7.3% as compared to 2004 NAVs. The following chart shows the initial share price of each of the funds as well as the current NAV as of December 31, 2005. CPA® Net Asset Values Original purchase price $10.00/share $13.30 7.26% $12.40 $12.40 2.48% $12.10 $10.00 4 0 0 2 5 0 0 2 CPA®: 12 4 0 0 2 5 0 0 2 CPA®: 14 $10.50 5 0 0 2 5.0% $10.00 CPA®: 15 1 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Since the introduction of the first CPA® fund in 1979, the W. P. Carey Group has paid to investors over $2 billion in quarterly cash distributions. $2,000,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $500,000,000 $250,000,000 $100,000,000 1979 1987 1991 1996 2001 April 2006 2006 Outlook As a company, we remain fortunate that our core business – to create and manage investments through net lease income funds – benefits from both continued demand from investors who seek stable, income-oriented securities and from corporations seeking innovative real estate financing solutions. We see these as long-term trends that should serve the company well. We face a number of challenges for 2006 and beyond. Chief among these is the possibility of a significant increase in interest rates. We have tried to insulate our portfolios from this impact by utilizing low amounts of floating rate debt. In addition, in our investments, we attempt to build an inflation adjustment into the lease structure. With the approach of using fixed-rate financing and attempting to inflation-index our lease revenues, combined with active management of our portfolios, we hope to be positioned relatively well despite a potential change in market interest rates. Furthermore, we operate in an increasingly competitive global investment environment. Indeed, low interest rates and low inflation have attracted a flood of capital 2 into our investment niche. Simply put, there is enormous liquidity worldwide seeking yield-based investments. We are mindful of this dynamic and are highly conscious of the need to remain disciplined in pursuing investment opportunities and to invest prudently in the context of changing markets. Because of our track record and our brand name, we continue to be able to originate investments around the globe. We consider the “W. P. Carey” brand as an investment manager, our 33-year track record of attractive returns, our directors and our employees as our most prized assets. Upon payment of the quarterly cash distributions on April 13, 2006, W. P. Carey & Co. LLC and its CPA® funds paid more than $2 billion through 700 distributions to investors since the inception of the first CPA® in 1979. This is a remarkable record of achievement for our company, and we are proud that we have been able to deliver these results to our investors over time. Our enterprise began somewhat modestly in 1973, but has grown to include more than 120,000 investors whom we serve today. For 2006, our aim is to continue to grow our assets under management through prudent investments and to build on our solid record of accomplishment for our CPA® fund investors. In addition, we will seek new areas for investment in which we can leverage our brand name and the relationships that we have created over the years. In closing, we want to thank the tens of thousands of investors, thousands of financial advisors, hundreds of companies and clients, and our over 125 employees for their continued trust and support. Sincerely, Wm. Polk Carey Chairman of the Board Gordon F. DuGan President and Chief Executive Officer From left: Wm. Polk Carey, Chairman of the Board, and Gordon F. DuGan, President and Chief Executive Officer Financial Statements Contents 4 Selected Financial Data 5 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 29 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 31 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 33 Consolidated Balance Sheets 34 Consolidated Statements of Income 35 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income 36 Consolidated Statements of Members’ Equity 38 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Revised) 40 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 71 Report on Form 10-K 72 Corporate Information W. P. Carey & Co. LLC 3 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t W. P. Carey & Co. LLC Selected Financial Data (In thousands except per share data) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Operating Data (1) Revenues Income from continuing operations (2) Basic earnings from $ 174,117 $ 222,202 $ 154,045 $ 146,990 $ 114,994 42,861 68,139 58,209 41,970 26,522 continuing operations per share 1.14 1.82 1.59 1.18 Diluted earnings from continuing operations per share Net income Basic earnings per share Diluted earnings per share Cash dividends paid Cash provided by operating activities Cash dividends declared per share Payment of mortgage principal (3) 1.10 48,604 1.29 1.25 67,004 52,707 1.79 9,229 1.75 65,841 1.76 1.69 65,073 98,849 1.76 9,428 1.52 62,878 1.72 1.64 62,978 67,295 1.73 8,548 1.16 46,588 1.31 1.28 60,708 75,896 1.72 8,428 .77 .76 35,761 1.04 1.02 58,048 58,877 1.70 8,230 Balance Sheet Data Real estate, net (4) Net investment in direct financing leases Total assets Long-term obligations (5) $ 462,343 $ 485,505 $ 421,543 $ 440,193 $ 435,629 131,975 190,644 983,262 1,013,539 246,163 278,821 182,452 906,505 158,605 189,339 893,524 226,102 258,041 915,883 287,903 (1) Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to discontinued operations. (2) Includes gain on sale of real estate in 2002 and 2001. (3) Represents scheduled mortgage principal paid. (4) Includes real estate accounted for under the operating method, operating real estate and real estate under construction, net of accumulated depreciation. (5) Represents mortgage and note obligations and deferred acquisition revenue installments that are due after more than one year. 4 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands, except per share and share amounts) The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of W. P. Carey & Co. LLC contain forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial state- ments and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2005. As used in this Annual Report, the terms “the Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” include W. P. Carey & Co. LLC, its consolidated subsidiaries and predecessors, unless otherwise indicated. Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “seeks,” “plans” or similar expres- sions. Do not unduly rely on forward-looking statements. They give our expectations about the future and are not guarantees, and speak only as of the date they are made. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievement to be mate- rially different from the results of operations or plan expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. While we cannot predict all of the risks and uncertainties, they include, but are not limited to, those described in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, such information should not be regarded as representations that the results or conditions described in such statements or that our objectives and plans will be achieved. Executive Overview Business Overview We are a publicly traded limited liability company. Our stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. We operate in two operating segments, management services operations and real estate operations. Within our management services operations, we are currently the advisor to the following affiliated publicly-owned, non- traded, real estate investment trusts: Corporate Property Associates 12 Incorporated (“CPA®:12”), Corporate Property Associates 14 Incorporated (“CPA®:14”), Corporate Property Associates 15 Incorporated (“CPA®:15”) and Corporate Property Associates 16 — Global Incorporated (“CPA®:16 — Global”) and served in this capac- ity for Carey Institutional Properties Incorporated (“CIP®”) until its merger with CPA®:15 in September 2004 (collectively, the “CPA® REITs”). CPA®:16 — Global was formed in 2003. Current Developments and Trends Current trends include: We continue to see intense competition in both the domestic and international markets for triple-net leased properties as capital continues to flow into real estate, in general, and triple-net leased real estate, in particular. We believe that the low long-term treasury rate by historical standards has created greater investor demand for yield-based investments, such as triple-net leased real estate, thus creating increased capital flows and a more competitive investment environment. We believe that several factors may provide us with continued investment opportunities both domestically and internationally including increased merger and acquisition activity, which may provide additional sale- 5 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t leaseback opportunities as a source of funding, a continued desire of corporations to divest themselves of real estate holdings and increasing opportunities for sale-leaseback transactions in the international market, which continues to make up a large portion of our investment opportunities. For the year ended December 31, 2005, international investments comprised 54% of the total investments we completed on behalf of the CPA® REITs . We currently expect international commercial real estate to com- prise a significant portion of the investments we make on behalf of the CPA® REITs although the percentage of international investments in any given period may vary substantially. Financing terms for international transac- tions are generally more favorable as they provide for lower interest rates and greater flexibility to finance the underlying property. These benefits may be partially offset by shorter financing maturities. Increases in long term interest rates would likely cause the value of our owned and managed assets to decrease, which would create lower revenues from managed assets and lower investment performance for our managed funds. Increases in interest rates may also have an impact on the credit quality of certain tenants. To the extent that the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) increases, additional rental income streams may be gener- ated for leases with CPI adjustment triggers. In addition, we constantly evaluate our debt exposure and to the extent that opportunities exist to refinance and lock in lower interest rates over a longer term, we may be able to reduce our exposure to short term interest rate fluctuation. Companies in automotive related industries (manufacturing, parts, services, etc.) are currently experiencing a difficult environment, which has resulted in several companies filing for bankruptcy protection. We currently have several auto industry related tenants in the portfolios we manage. Some of these tenants in the CPA® REITs that we manage have filed voluntary petitions of bankruptcy in recent months. If conditions in this industry worsen, additional tenants may file for bankruptcy protection and may disaffirm their leases as part of their bankruptcy reorganization plans. The net result of these trends may have an adverse impact on our man- agement income from affiliates. For the year ended December 31, 2005, distributions paid of $67,004 were greater than cash flows generated from operations and equity investments of $58,871. Existing cash and cash equivalent reserves were used to fund the difference. During the year we used a portion of our cash reserves to fund a portion of our 2004 tax lia- bility. Additionally, for 2005 we elected to receive all performance revenue as well as the asset management revenue of CPA®:12 and CPA®:16 — Global in restricted shares rather than cash. During 2005, we received $31,858 from the CPA® REITs in restricted shares due to our election. For 2006, we have elected to continue to receive all performance revenue from the CPA® REITs as well as the base asset management revenue payable by CPA®:16 — Global in restricted shares rather than cash. However, for 2006 we have elected to receive the base asset management revenue from CPA®:12 in cash. While we expect that the election to receive restricted shares will continue to have a negative impact on cash flows during 2006, as the election as to which revenue to collect in cash or stock is annual, we expect that cash flows will benefit by approximately $3,800 as a result of receiving CPA®:12’s base asset management revenue in cash instead of restricted shares. See Financial Condition section below for further discussion of our uses of cash in 2005. How We Earn Revenue Revenues from the management services operations are earned by providing services to the CPA® REITs in connection with structuring and negotiating investments and related debt placement (structuring revenue) and providing on-going management of the portfolio (asset-based management and performance revenue). The revenues of this business segment are subject to fluctuation because the volume and timing of transactions that are originated on behalf of the CPA® REITs are subject to various uncertainties including competition for triple-net lease transactions, the requirement that each investment meet suitability standards and due diligence 6 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC requirements, including approval of each investment by the investment committee, and the ability to raise capital on behalf of the CPA® REITs. Revenues from our real estate operations are earned primarily from leasing real estate. We invest in and own commercial properties that are then leased to companies domestically and internationally, primarily on a triple- net lease basis. Revenue from this business segment is subject to fluctuation because of lease expirations, lease terminations, the timing of new lease transactions, tenant defaults and sales of property. How Management Evaluates Results of Operations Management evaluates our results of operations with a primary focus on increasing and enhancing the value, quality and amount of the assets under management by our management services operations and seeking to increase value in our real estate operations through focusing efforts on underperforming assets through re-leas- ing efforts, including negotiation of lease renewals, or selectively selling such assets. The ability to increase assets under management by structuring investments on behalf of the CPA® REITs is affected, among other things, by the CPA® REITs’ ability to raise capital and our ability to identify appropriate investments. Management’s evaluation of operating results includes our ability to generate necessary cash flow in order to fund distributions to our shareholders. As a result, management’s assessment of operating results gives less emphasis to the effect of unrealized gains and losses, which may cause fluctuations in net income for compara- ble periods but has no impact on cash flow, and to other non-cash charges such as depreciation and impairment charges. In evaluating cash flow from operations, management includes equity distributions that are included in investing activities to the extent that the distributions in excess of equity income are the result of non-cash charges such as depreciation and amortization. Management does not consider unrealized gains and losses from short-term foreign currency fluctuations when evaluating our ability to fund distributions. Management’s evalu- ation of our potential for generating cash flow includes an assessment of the long-term sustainability of both our real estate portfolio and the assets we manage on behalf of the CPA® REITs. Results of Operations We evaluate our results from operations by major business segment as follows: MANAGEMENT SERVICES OPERATIONS — This business segment includes management services performed for the CPA® REITs pursuant to advisory agreements. This business line also includes interest on deferred revenue and earnings from unconsolidated investments in the CPA® REITs accounted for under the equity method which were received in lieu of cash for certain payments due under the advisory agreements. In connection with maintaining our status as a publicly traded partnership, this business segment is carried out largely by corporate subsidiaries which are subject to federal, state, local and foreign taxes as applicable. Our financial statements are prepared on a consolidated basis including these taxable operations and include a provision for current and deferred taxes on these operations. REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS — This business segment includes the operations of properties under oper- ating lease, properties under direct financing leases, real estate under construction and development, assets held for sale and equity investments in ventures accounted for under the equity method which are engaged in these activities. Because of our legal structure, these operations are not generally subject to federal income taxes; however, they may be subject to certain state, local and foreign taxes. 7 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t A summary of comparative results of these business segments is as follows: Management Services Operations 2005 Revenues For the years ended December 31, 2004 CHANGE 2004 2003 CHANGE Asset management revenue $(62,294 $(061,194 $(01,100 $(061,194 $(56,402 $(04,792 Structuring revenue 28,197 33,675 (5,478) 33,675 31,658 2,017 Structuring revenue from CIP® merger Incentive and subordinated disposition revenue from CIP® merger Revenues of other business operations Operating Expenses — — 11,493 (11,493) 11,493 — 11,493 42,095 (42,095) 42,095 — 42,095 372 (1,303) 1,675 (1,303) 1,298 (2,601) 90,863 147,154 (56,291) 147,154 89,358 57,796 General and administrative (49,420) (45,495) (3,925) (45,495) (39,872) (5,623) Depreciation and amortization Other Income and Expenses (5,602) (9,366) 3,764 (9,366) (7,123) (2,243) (55,022) (54,861) (161) (54,861) (46,995) (7,866) Other interest income 2,935 2,857 78 2,857 2,323 534 Income from equity investments Minority interest in income Gain on foreign currency transactions and other gains, net Interest expense Income from continuing operations before income taxes 2,092 235 2,000 — 7,262 1,643 (1,010) — (35) 449 1,245 2,000 35 1,643 (1,010) 859 (202) — (35) — — 3,455 3,807 3,455 2,980 784 (808) — (35) 475 43,103 95,748 (52,645) 95,748 45,343 50,405 Provision for income taxes (18,662) (49,546) 30,884 (49,546) (17,715) (31,831) Income from continuing operations $(24,441 $(046,202 $0(21,761) $(046,202 $(27,628 $(18,574 8 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC Asset Management Revenue We earn asset management revenue (asset-based management and performance revenue) from the CPA® REITs based on assets under management. As funds available to the CPA® REITs are invested, the asset base for which we earn revenue increases. The asset management revenue that we earn may increase or decrease depending upon (i) increases in the CPA® REIT asset bases as a result of new investments; (ii) decreases in the CPA® REIT asset base resulting from sales of investments; or (iii) increases or decreases in the asset valuations of CPA® REIT funds. 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, asset management revenue increased $1,100 primarily due to an increase of $7,475 in revenue arising from an increase in assets under management, as described above, including the investment by CPA®:16 — Global of proceeds from its public offering. This increase was partially offset by a decrease of $948 in asset management revenues as a result of the sale by CIP® of $142,161 of its properties to us prior to its merger in September 2004 with CPA®:15 as well as a reduction in marketing and personnel reimbursements. We are reimbursed for marketing costs incurred on behalf of the CPA® REITs when they are actively engaged in fund raising. During 2004, we incurred and were subsequently reimbursed approximately $5,430 in marketing costs as it relates to the CPA®:16 – Global offering. This offer- ing was terminated in March 2005, and as a result we incurred and were therefore reimbursed less in 2005 versus 2004. During 2005, we structured approximately $865,000 in investments on behalf of the CPA® REITs, of which 68% were structured on behalf of CPA®:16 — Global compared to $890,000 in investments during the prior year, of which 45% were CPA®:16 — Global investments. A portion of the CPA® REIT asset management revenue is based on each CPA® REIT meeting specific per- formance criteria and is earned only if the criteria are achieved. The performance criterion for CPA®:16 — Global has not yet been satisfied as of December 31, 2005, resulting in $3,698 in performance revenue being deferred by us for the year ended December 31, 2005. Since the inception of CPA®:16 — Global, we have deferred $4,518 of performance revenue. We will only be able to recognize this revenue if the performance cri- terion is met. The performance criterion for CPA®:16 — Global is a cumulative non-compounded distribution return to shareholders of 6%. As of December 31, 2005, CPA®:16 — Global’s current distribution rate was 6.25% and its cumulative distribution return was 5.42%. Based on management’s current assessment, CPA®:16 — Global is expected to meet the cumulative performance criterion during the first half of 2007, at which time we would record the cumulative unrecognized revenue. There is no assurance that the performance criterion will be achieved as projected as it is dependent on, among other factors, the investment of CPA®:16 — Global’s existing capital and any additional capital raised in a future offering of its shares, and in the performance of properties that CPA®:16 — Global invests in generating income in excess of the performance criterion, as well as on the distribution rates that may be set by CPA®:16 — Global’s board of directors. If the performance crite- rion is achieved, incentive compensation related to achievement of the performance criterion, in the amount of $3,335 as of December 31, 2005, would become payable by us to certain employees. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, asset management revenue increased $4,792 primarily due to an approximate 41% increase in the asset base of the CPA® REITs since December 31, 2003 (including, through September 1, 2004, the asset base of the interests in properties we acquired from CIP®). Structuring Revenue Structuring revenue includes current and deferred acquisition revenue from structuring investments and financ- ing on behalf of the CPA® REITs. Investment activity is subject to fluctuations. As described above in the Current Developments and Trends section, we continue to face intense competition for investments in com- mercial properties both domestically and internationally. 9 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, structuring revenue decreased $16,971 primarily due to structuring revenue of $11,493 earned in 2004 in connection with the CIP® and CPA®:15 merger and, to a lesser extent, a reduction in investment volume. The decrease was also partially attributable to charging a reduced fee on an investment completed on behalf of CPA®:16 — Global during 2005 and lower structuring revenue recognized because CPA®:16 — Global has not yet met its performance criterion. We structured approximately $865,000 of investments for the year ended December 31, 2005 as com- pared with approximately $890,000 in the comparable prior year. Approximately 68% of investments structured during the year ended December 31, 2005 related to CPA®:16 — Global as compared with approximately 45% in the comparable prior year. The increase in the percentage of investments structured on behalf of CPA®:16 — Global resulted in a larger deferral of revenue until CPA®:16 — Global’s performance criterion is achieved. As discussed above, a portion of the CPA® REIT structuring revenue is based on each CPA® REIT meeting specific performance criteria and is earned only if the criteria are achieved. The performance criterion for CPA®:16 — Global has not yet been satisfied as of December 31, 2005, resulting in $10,174 in structuring rev- enue being deferred by us for the year ended December 31, 2005. Since the inception of CPA®:16 — Global, we have deferred $17,708 of structuring revenue and interest thereon of $859. We will only be able to recognize this revenue if the performance criterion is met. The current status and anticipated future achievement of the per- formance criterion is discussed further above. Given that CPA®:16 — Global represents a significant portion of our total 2005 investment volume relative to the other CPA® REITs, and that this is likely to continue to be the case for 2006, structuring revenue is likely to continue to decrease during 2006 unless a liquidity event takes place for CPA®:12. No decisions have been made as to when or in what form such an event might take place. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, structuring revenue increased $13,510 principally due to revenue of $11,493 that we earned in connection with the CIP® and CPA®:15 merger. We structured investments totaling approximately $890,000 in 2004 as compared with approximately $725,000 in 2003. Although the amount of investments structured increased in 2004 as compared to 2003, the positive impact of this increase on structuring revenue was principally offset by an increase in the deferral of such revenue from structuring investments on behalf of CPA®:16 — Global, as CPA®:16 — Global did not achieve its performance criterion as of December 31, 2004. Incentive and Subordinated Disposition Revenue from CIP® Merger In connection with the CIP® merger in September 2004, we earned incentive revenue of $23,681 and subordi- nated disposition revenue of $18,414 from CIP®, in addition to the structuring revenue described above. Incentive and disposition revenue is generally earned in connection with events which provide liquidity or alternatives to the CPA® REIT shareholders. These events do not occur every year and no such event occurred in 2005 or 2003. Revenues of Other Business Operations Revenues from other business operations represent income from a build-to-suit development management agree- ment with the Los Angeles Unified School District (the “District”). We entered into this agreement through a wholly owned subsidiary during 2002 for the development and construction of a new high school. Income on the project has been recognized using a blended profit margin under the percentage of completion method. 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, we recognized net revenues of $372 and $(1,303), respectively. The loss in 2004 was primarily due to a change in our estimate of profit on the development project resulting from disputes with the contractor. During 2005, we reached a settlement with the District and certain other parties connected with the build-to-suit development management agreement. 10 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we recognized a loss of $1,303 and income of $1,298, respectively, from our build-to-suit development management agreement with the District. The decrease in income is attributable to a change in our estimate of profit on the development project result- ing from disputes with the contractor. General and Administrative 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, general and administrative expenses increased $3,925 primarily due to increases in professional fees of $4,114, business development related expenses of $2,862 and other office expenses of $2,205. These increases were partially offset by a reduction in personnel related costs of approximately $5,430. The increase in professional fees is primarily related to ongoing securities law compliance, including increased costs of compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, an increase in costs associated with the ongoing SEC investigation and legal expenses associated with the District settlement referred to above and other legal matters. The increase in business development related expenses is a combination of increased advertising and costs associated with potential investment opportunities which were ultimately not pursued. Also included in business development related expenses is the write-off of approximately $811 of costs due to the withdrawal of Corporate Property Associates International Incorporated’s registration statement related to its proposed public offering of common stock. The increase in office expenses is mainly attributable to the consolidation, since January 1, 2005, of the results of operations of a limited partnership which was previously established to admin- ister an office sharing agreement. As a result, our rental and other office sharing expenses have increased compared with the prior year, although this increase is partially offset by a corresponding decrease in minority interest expense. We are reimbursed for marketing costs incurred on behalf of the CPA® REITs when they are actively engaged in fund raising. During 2004, we incurred and were subsequently reimbursed approximately $5,430 in marketing costs as it relates to the CPA®:16 – Global offering. This offering was terminated in March 2005, and as a result we incurred less in 2005 versus 2004. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, general and administrative expense increased by $5,623, primarily due to an increase in personnel costs of $3,754 and increases in fees for account- ing, auditing and consulting services related to ongoing securities law compliance, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as an increase in legal fees related to the ongoing SEC investigation. A portion of personnel costs is directly related to CPA® REIT fundraising and transaction activities. The increase in person- nel costs was attributable to higher transaction volume of $165,000 during the comparable years and a $2,385 increase in personnel costs related to non-cash charges for compensation from share incentive plan awards to our officers and employees. Of the $2,385 increase, $2,155 reflects an increase in awards that fluctuate with changes in fair value because such awards are accounted for using variable plan accounting. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in capital raising activities. For the comparable years, there was a decrease in fundraising volume of approximately $41,000. Depreciation and Amortization 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $3,764. The decrease is primarily due to $2,798 of accelerated amortization and $1,445 of scheduled amortization in 2004 on certain intangible assets related to a management contract with CIP®, which was terminated as a result of CIP®’s merger with CPA®:15 and resulted in no corresponding amortization expense in 2005. These decreases were partially offset by additional depreciation expense in 2005 as a result of an increase in our fixed asset base. 11 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, depreciation and amortization expense increased by $2,243 primarily due to accelerated amortization of certain intangible assets of $2,798 related to the management contract with CIP®, which was terminated as a result of CIP®’s merger with CPA®:15. This increase was partially offset by a reduction in amortization expense on certain intangibles assets that became fully amortized during 2003. Income from Equity Investments 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, income from equity investments increased $449, primarily due to an increase in our ownership of shares in the CPA® REITs as a result of receiv- ing restricted shares in consideration for base asset management and performance revenue from certain of the CPA® REITs. Based on current distribution rates, our annual dividends from the CPA® REITs for 2006 are pro- jected to be $4,773. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, income from equity investments increased $784, primarily due to an increase in our ownership of shares in the CPA® REITs as a result of receiv- ing restricted shares in consideration for performance revenue. Gain on Foreign Currency Transactions and Other Gains, net We recognized a non-cash gain of $2,000 during 2005 as a result of entering into a settlement agreement with the District and certain other parties in connection with the build-to-suit development management agreement described above. The income represents the deferral of a portion of the gain on sale of land to the District in 2002. Provision for Income Taxes 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the provision for income taxes decreased $30,884 due to decreased pre-tax earnings in 2005 as discussed above and a decrease in the effective tax rate. Approximately 86% of our management revenue in 2005 was earned by a taxable, wholly owned subsidiary. The effective tax rate for 2005 was 43% as compared to 52% in 2004. The decrease is primarily due to a significant portion of our 2004 revenue being earned in states with higher tax rates. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the provision for income taxes increased $31,831 due to increased pre-tax earnings in 2004 as discussed above. Approximately 95% of our management revenue in 2004, which increased $60,397 as compared to 2003, was earned by a taxable, wholly owned subsidiary. The effective income tax rate for 2004 was 52% as compared to 42% in 2003. Income from Continuing Operations 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, income from continuing operations decreased $21,761 primarily due to the revenue we earned in 2004 related to the CIP® and CPA®:15 merger. The net of tax impact of revenue earned from this merger approximated $27,000. A reduction in structuring revenue as a result of lower investment volume in 2005 as compared to 2004 and an increase in the percentage of investments structured for CPA®:16 — Global also contributed to the decrease in income from continuing operations in 2005, as did the increase in general and administrative expenses described above. These decreases were partially offset by the increased income from other business operations and decreased depreciation and amortization expense as described above. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, income from continuing operations increased $18,574 primarily due to revenue earned in connection with the CIP® and CPA®:15 merger and increased management revenue earned in connection with 2004 fundraising and investment activity on behalf 12 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC of the CPA® REITs. These increases were primarily offset by an increase in the provision for income taxes. These variances are all described above. Real Estate Operations 2005 For the years ended December 31, 2004 CHANGE 2004 2003 CHANGE Revenues Lease revenues $(69,535 $(62,397 $(7,138 $(62,397 $(57,676 $(04,721 Other operating income 6,592 5,623 969 5,623 5,211 412 Revenues of other business operations Operating Expenses 7,127 83,254 7,028 75,048 99 8,206 7,028 75,048 1,800 64,687 5,228 10,361 General and administrative (5,764) (5,490) (274) (5,490) (3,823) (1,667) Depreciation and amortization Property expenses Impairment charges and (15,150) (7,396) (11,662) (3,488) (11,662) (5,577) (1,819) (5,577) (9,075) (5,745) (2,587) 168 loan losses (15,154) (12,899) (2,255) (12,899) (1,480) (11,419) Operating expenses of other business operations (6,327) (6,261) (66) (6,261) (1,209) (5,052) (49,791) (41,889) (7,902) (41,889) (21,332) (20,557) Other Income and Expenses Other interest income 576 Income from equity investments 3,090 Minority interest in income (499) (Loss) gain on foreign currency transactions and other 270 3,665 (489) 306 (575) (10) 270 3,665 258 3,149 (489) (168) gains, net Interest expense Income from continuing (695) (16,787) (14,315) 1,222 (1,917) 1,222 48 (14,453) (2,334) (14,453) (14,660) (9,785) (4,530) (9,785) (11,373) 12 516 (321) 1,174 207 1,588 operations before income taxes 19,148 Provision for income taxes (728) 23,374 (1,437) (4,226) 23,374 31,982 (8,608) 709 (1,437) (1,401) (36) Income from continuing operations 18,420 21,937 (3,517) 21,937 30,581 (8,644) Income (loss) from discontinued operations 5,743 (2,298) 8,041 (2,298) 4,669 (6,967) Net income $(24,163 $(19,639 $(4,524 $(19,639 $(35,250 $(15,611) 13 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Our real estate operations consist of the investment in and the leasing of commercial real estate. Management’s evaluation of the sources of lease revenues for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, are as follows: Rental income Interest income from direct financing leases Years ended December 31, 2005 2004 2003 $ 52,386 17,149 $ 69,535 $ 44,817 17,580 $ 62,397 $ 40,558 17,118 $ 57,676 For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, we earned net lease revenues (i.e., rental income and interest income from direct financing leases) from our direct ownership of real estate from the following lease obligations: Bouygues Telecom, S.A. (a) (d) Detroit Diesel Corporation Dr Pepper Bottling Company of Texas Orbital Sciences Corporation (c) Titan Corporation (b) America West Holdings Corp. AutoZone, Inc. Quebecor Printing, Inc. (c) (f) Gibson Greetings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of American Greetings, Inc. (g) Sybron Dental Specialties Inc. Unisource Worldwide, Inc. BE Aerospace, Inc. Eagle Hardware & Garden, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Lowe’s Companies Inc. (c) Lucent Technologies, Inc. (b) Sprint Spectrum, L.P. CSS Industries, Inc. (e) AT&T Corporation Enviro Works, Inc. (b) Swat-Fame, Inc. (c) United States Postal Service BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Omnicom Group Inc. (b) Brodart, Co. (e) Anthony’s Manufacturing Company, Inc. United Space Alliance, LLC Lockheed Martin Corporation Other (a) (b) (d) 14 Years ended December 31, 2005 $ 4,674 2004 $ 4,436 2003 $ 3,915 4,396 4,382 3,023 2,898 2,838 2,326 1,941 1,884 1,770 1,609 1,582 1,549 1,518 1,425 1,380 1,259 1,254 1,239 1,233 1,224 1,140 1,110 1,061 1,055 1,039 4,158 4,334 2,747 965 2,838 2,362 1,523 2,069 1,770 1,705 1,585 1,306 524 1,425 1,637 1,259 433 1,086 1,233 1,224 378 1,273 1,019 1,051 1,094 4,158 4,290 2,655 — 2,738 2,393 1,523 2,085 1,613 1,710 1,620 1,338 — 1,425 1,647 1,259 — 885 1,233 1,224 — 1,235 1,019 951 1,195 18,726 $ 69,535 16,963 $ 62,397 15,565 $ 57,676 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC (a) Revenue amounts are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. (b) Includes the CIP® real estate interests acquired in September 2004. (c) Increase is due to rent increase in 2005. (d) Lease revenues applicable to minority interest in the consolidated amounts above total $1,677, $1,597 and $1,316 as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. (e) Decrease due to a reduction in the estimated residual value of property under direct finance lease. (f) In December 2005, Quebecor exercised its option to purchase one of the properties it leases from us. This property has been reclassified to an asset held for sale and its operations have been reclassified to discontinued operations. (g) In December 2005, Gibson purchased one of the two properties it leases from us and negotiated a lease termination agreement with us for the remaining property. The operations of the property sold in 2005 have been reclassified to discontinued operations. We recognize income from equity investments of which lease revenues are a significant component. Our ownership interests range from 22.5% to 50%. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, our share of net lease revenues in the following lease obligations is as follows: Carrefour France, SA (a) Federal Express Corporation CheckFree Holdings Corporation Inc. Information Resources, Inc. Sicor, Inc. (b) Hologic, Inc. Childtime Childcare, Inc. Titan Corporation (c) Years ended December 31, 2005 $ 3,496 2004 $ 3,417 2,697 2,247 1,699 1,671 1,136 472 — 2,668 2,180 1,644 557 1,136 472 354 2003 $ 253 2,639 2,128 1,644 — 1,136 470 517 $ 13,418 $ 12,428 $ 8,787 (a) Revenue amounts are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. (b) Includes the CIP® real estate interests acquired in September 2004. (c) We acquired the remaining interest in this property with the September 2004 acquisition of CIP® real estate interests. Lease Revenues 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, lease revenues (rental income and interest income from direct financing leases) increased $7,138 primarily due to $7,126 in revenue from proper- ties acquired from CIP® in September 2004, $1,509 in rent increases from existing tenants and $654 of rent increases from new tenants at existing properties. These increases were partially offset by a reduction in rent of $1,417 primarily due to lease expirations at certain properties and a reduction of $734 in interest income from direct financing leases for financial reporting purposes as a result of reducing estimated residual values on sev- eral leases. Our net leases generally have rent increases based on formulas indexed to increases in the CPI or other indices for the jurisdiction in which the property is located, sales overrides or other periodic increases, which are designed to increase lease revenues in the future. In December 2005, we negotiated a lease termination agreement with Gibson, the lessee at our Amberly Village, Ohio property, for lease termination proceeds of $3,000 (see Other Operating Income below). Lease revenue at this property was $1,884 for 2005. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, lease revenue increased by $4,721. The increase was primarily attributable to revenue earned from the properties acquired from CIP® in September 2004 of $3,559 and additional revenue from rent increases and new tenants at existing properties. 15 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Other Operating Income Other operating income generally consists of lease termination payments and other non-rent related revenues from real estate operations including, but not limited to, settlements of claims against former lessees. We receive settlements in the ordinary course of business; however, the timing and amount of such settlements can- not always be estimated. 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, other operating income increased $969. The increase is primarily due to $3,000 of lease termination proceeds received from the termination of an existing lease at our property in Amberly Village, Ohio leased to Gibson as well as an increase of $570 in reim- bursable tenant costs. Actual recoveries of reimbursable tenant costs are recorded as both revenue and expense and therefore have no impact on net income. These increases were partially offset by a reduction of $2,620 in settlement proceeds received from outstanding bankruptcy claims. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, other operating income increased $412 primarily due to increased bankruptcy claim distributions and other settlement income received from for- mer lessees in 2004. Revenues of Other Business Operations Revenues of other business operations consist of revenues from Livho, Inc. (“Livho”) a Holiday Inn hotel fran- chise which we operate at our property in Livonia, Michigan. 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, revenues of other business operations remained relatively unchanged. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, revenues of other business operations increased by $5,228. The increase is due to the consolidation of Livho’s operations in connection with the adoption of FIN 46(R) on January 1, 2004. Under FIN46(R), Livho is considered to be a variable interest entity, of which we are the primary beneficiary and are therefore required to consolidate the revenues and expenses of its operations. Prior to adopting FIN46(R), we recognized rental revenue from our lease with Livho. General and Administrative 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, general and administrative expenses increased $274 primarily due to an increase in investor related services, including printing and proxy solicita- tion costs. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, general and administrative expenses increased $1,667 primarily due to an increase in fees for auditing and consulting services related to ongoing securities law compliance, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and internal audit fees, as well as an increase in legal fees associated with our real estate operations. Depreciation and Amortization 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, depreciation and amortization expense increased by $3,488. The increase is primarily due to $4,292 of depreciation and amortization expense on the properties acquired from CIP® in September 2004. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, depreciation and amortization expense increased $2,587. The increase is primarily due to depreciation and amortization expense recognized on the properties acquired from CIP® of $1,766 which was partially offset by a decrease in amortization in con- nection with certain intangibles that became fully amortized in 2003. 16 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC Property Expenses 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, property expenses increased $1,819 primarily due to increases in property related expenses such as legal and professional fees at specific properties and increases in reimbursable tenant costs. Actual recoveries of reimbursable tenant costs are recorded as both revenue and expense and therefore have no impact on net income. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, property expenses decreased $168 pri- marily due to decreases in legal and professional fees as well as a reduction in the previously estimated bad debt reserve related to certain tenants. These decreases were partially offset by increases in real estate taxes at spe- cific properties and increased property carrying costs on the properties acquired from CIP® in September 2004. Impairment Charges and Loan Losses For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, we recorded impairment charges and loan losses related to our continuing real estate operations totaling $15,154, $12,899 and $1,480, respectively. During these years, impairment charges were recorded due to several factors including our decision to sell property at less than its carrying value, our determination that the property has experienced an other than temporary decline in value and, for direct financing leases, our assessment that the unguaranteed residual value of the underlying property had declined. The table below summarizes the impairment charges recorded in 2005, 2004 and 2003 for both assets held for use and assets held for sale: PROPERTY CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES REASON 2005 2004 2003 IMPAIRMENT IMPAIRMENT IMPAIRMENT Amberly Village, Ohio $ 9,450 West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 2,684 Memphis, Tennessee Winona, Minnesota Livonia, Michigan Various properties $ 2,337 1,250 7,500 1,812 1,130 1,890 $ 1,480 Impairment charges from continuing operations Toledo, Ohio $ 15,154 $ 12,899 $ 1,480 $ 4,700 Berea, Kentucky $ 5,241 1,099 Frankenmuth, Michigan 1,000 Lancaster, Pennsylvania $ 1,430 Various properties 1,375 2,400 1,530 Impairment charges from discontinued operations $ 6,616 $ 9,199 $ 2,960 Property to be sold for less than carrying value — subsequently reclassified as an asset held for use Decline in unguaranteed residual value of property Decline in unguaranteed residual value of property Loan loss related to sale of property Decline in asset value Decline in unguaranteed residual value of properties or decline in asset value Property sold for less than carrying value Property sold for less than carrying value Property sold for less than carrying value Property sold for less than carrying value Property sold / to be sold for less than carrying value or property value has declined 17 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Operating Expenses of Other Business Operations Operating expenses of other business operations consist of operating expenses incurred in operating our Holiday Inn hotel franchise at our property in Livonia, Michigan. 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, operating expenses of other business operations remained relatively unchanged. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, operating expenses of other business operations increased by $5,052. The increase is due to the consolidation, since January 1, 2004, of Livho’s oper- ations pursuant to the adoption of FIN 46(R) as described above. Income from Equity Investments 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, income from equity investments decreased $575, primarily due to the full year effect of an acquisition in September 2004 of a 50% interest in a general partnership and the remaining 81.46% interest in a limited partnership. In 2005, we recorded an increase of $244 in the loss related to the 50% interest in the general partnership. In addition, income from equity investments also decreased $303 as a result of the acquisition of the remaining interests in a limited part- nership which, subsequent to the acquisition, is accounted for as a consolidated subsidiary. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, income from equity investments increased $516, primarily due to income of $755 representing the full year impact from the acquisition of a 22.5% interest in eight Carrefour France, SA properties in France in November 2003, partially offset by a decrease in equity income in connection with acquiring a 50% interest in a general partnership and the remaining 81.46% interest in a limited partnership. We recorded a loss of $136 related to the 50% interest in the general partnership in 2004. Interest Expense 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, interest expense increased $2,334, primarily due to an increase of $2,134 related to higher average outstanding borrowings and higher variable interest rates related to our credit facility, $1,165 related to debt balances outstanding on the properties acquired from CIP® in September 2004 and $526 related to new mortgage debt at existing properties. These increases were partially offset by lower interest payments resulting from paying off mortgage balances and scheduled principal payments. The average outstanding balance and annual variable interest rate on our credit facility increased by approximately $31,000 and 1.8%, respectively, for the comparable years. 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, interest expense decreased by $207. The decrease was partially due to a reduction in interest expense of $1,371 as a result of paying off mortgage balances and scheduled principal payments. The decrease was partially offset by increases in interest expense of $615 related to the assumption of mortgages from our acquisition of 17 properties from CIP® in September 2004 and $458 related to additional borrowings and higher interest rates related to our credit facility. The average outstanding balance and annual variable interest rate on our credit facility increased by approximately $15,000 and 0.2%, respectively, for the comparable years. Income from Continuing Operations 2005 VS. 2004 — For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, income from continuing operations decreased $3,517, primarily due to an increase in impairment charges of $2,255. The remainder of the decrease is due to additional operating expenses and interest charges from the CIP® properties acquired in 2004 which were partially offset by income generated by the CIP® properties. These variances are all described above. 18 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC 2004 VS. 2003 — For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, income from continuing operations decreased $8,644, primarily due to an increase in impairment charges of $11,419 and increases in general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization, all of which are described above. These increases were substantially offset by an increase in lease revenues of $4,721, which is described above and an increase in gain on foreign currency transactions of $1,174. Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations 2005 — For the year ended December 31, 2005, we earned income from discontinued operations of $5,743 primarily from gains on sales of several properties totaling $10,474 and income of $1,885 from the operations of discontinued operations partially offset by impairment charges totaling $6,616 on several of these properties. 2004 — For the year ended December 31, 2004, we incurred a loss from discontinued operations of $2,298 primarily due to impairment charges totaling $9,199 partially offset by income from operations of discontinued operations. 2003 — For the year ended December 31, 2003, we earned income from discontinued operations of $4,669 primarily from income of $6,391 from the operations of discontinued operations and gains on the sale of real estate of $1,238 partially offset by impairment charges totaling $2,960 on several of these properties. Impairment charges for 2005, 2004 and 2003 are described in Impairment Charges and Loan Losses above. The effect of suspending depreciation expense as a result of the classification of certain properties as held for sale was $235, $381 and $259 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. FINANCIAL CONDITION Uses of Cash During the Year There has been no material change in our financial condition since December 31, 2004. Cash and cash equiva- lents totaled $13,014 as of December 31, 2005, a decrease of $3,701 from the December 31, 2004 balance. We believe that we will generate sufficient cash from operations and, if necessary, from the proceeds of limited recourse mortgage loans, unused capacity on our credit facility, unsecured indebtedness and the issuance of additional equity securities to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity needs. We assess our ability to access capital on an ongoing basis. Our use of cash during the year is described below. Operating Activities In evaluating cash flow from operations, management includes cash flow from distributions received on equity investments, which are included in investing activities to the extent that the distributions in excess of equity income are the result of non-cash charges such as depreciation and amortization. Distributions paid to share- holders of $67,004 were substantially funded by cash flows from operating activities and distributions received from equity investments of $58,871. Existing cash and cash equivalent reserves were used to fund the differ- ence. For 2006, we have elected to continue to receive all performance revenue from the CPA® REITs as well as the asset management revenue payable by CPA®:16 — Global in restricted shares rather than cash. However, for 2006 we have elected to receive the base asset management revenue from CPA®:12 in cash. While we expect that the election to receive restricted shares will continue to have a negative impact on cash flows dur- ing 2006, as the election as to which revenue to collect in cash or stock is annual, we expect that cash flows will benefit by approximately $3,800 as a result of receiving CPA®:12’s base asset management revenue in cash instead of restricted shares. During 2005, we received revenue of $22,847 in connection with structuring investments and revenue of $20,523 from providing asset-based management services on behalf of the CPA® REITs, exclusive of that 19 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t portion of such revenue being satisfied by the CPA® REITs through the issuance of their restricted common stock rather than paying cash. In January 2005, we received $11,817 from the annual installment of deferred acquisition revenue. The next installment of deferred acquisition revenue was received in January 2006 and amounted to $15,474, including interest. The installments are subject to certain subordination provisions. CPA®:16 — Global has not yet met the subordination provisions and management currently anticipates that no deferred amounts will be paid until the first half of 2007. Our real estate operations provided cash flows (contractual lease revenues, net of property-level debt service) of approximately $51,674. Annual cash flow from operations is currently projected to fund distributions; how- ever, operating cash flow fluctuates on a quarterly basis due to factors that include the timing of the receipt of transaction-related revenue, the timing of certain compensation costs that are paid and receipt of the annual installment of deferred acquisition revenue and interest thereon in the first quarter. Cash flows from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2005, were affected by several factors including the following: • During 2004, cash flows from operating activities benefited as a result of revenue earned in connection with the CIP® and CPA®:15 merger. The net of tax impact of this revenue approximated $27,000 in 2004. • We used approximately $5,200 to fund a portion of our 2004 tax liability. • In 2005, we elected to receive all performance revenue of the CPA® REITs as well as the base asset manage- ment revenue of CPA®:12 and the asset management revenue payable by CPA®:16 — Global in restricted shares rather than cash. This election, combined with an increase in performance revenue over the prior year, resulted in $10,859 less in cash being received from the CPA® REITs in 2005 as compared with 2004. Investing Activities Our investing activities are generally comprised of real estate transactions (purchases and sales) and capitalized property related costs. Substantially all of our property-related activity for 2005 was comprised of selling several properties. We did not make any significant investments in 2005. Net proceeds from the sales of several properties and invest- ments totaled $45,542 in 2005. In line with our strategy of selling certain of our smaller properties as well as properties that do not generate significant cash flow or require more intensive asset management services, two of the properties disposed of in 2005 were vacant. During 2005, we also paid our annual installment of deferred acquisition revenue of $524 to our former management company relating to 1998 and 1999 property acquisi- tions. The remaining obligation as of December 31, 2005 is $1,185. We currently anticipate using cash from operations to fund the remaining obligation. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we received distributions of $5,019 from the CPA® REITs, with $2,927 included in cash flows from investing activities, representing an amount in excess of the income recog- nized on the CPA® REIT investments for financial reporting purposes. Financing Activities During 2005, we paid distributions to shareholders of $67,004, an increase over the prior year. In addition to paying distributions, our financing activities included making scheduled and prepaying mortgage principal pay- ments totaling $14,122 and paying down the outstanding balance on our credit facility by $87,000. We used a portion of the proceeds of $61,764 from refinancing of several limited recourse mortgages, $45,542 from the sales of properties and investments and cash generated from operations in the normal course of business to fund the repayment on our credit facility. Gross borrowings under the credit facility were $60,000, which were used for several purposes in the normal course of business, and repayments were $147,000. We also raised $4,400 from the issuance of shares primarily through our Distribution Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan. 20 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC In the case of limited recourse mortgage financing that does not fully amortize over its term or is currently due, we are responsible for the balloon payment only to the extent of our interest in the encumbered property because the holder generally has recourse only to the collateral. When balloon payments come due, we may seek to refinance the loans, restructure the debt with the existing lenders or evaluate our ability to satisfy the obligation from our existing resources including our revolving line of credit. To the extent the remaining initial lease term on any property remains in place for a number of years beyond the balloon payment date, we believe that the ability to refinance balloon payment obligations is enhanced. We also evaluate our outstanding loans for opportunities to refinance debt at lower interest rates that may occur as a result of decreasing interest rates or improvements in the credit rating of tenants. We believe we have sufficient resources to pay off the loans if they are not refinanced. In addition, approximately 78% of our outstanding mortgage debt has fixed rates of interest so that debt service obligations will not significantly increase if market interest rates increase. Cash Resources As of December 31, 2005, we had $13,014 in cash and cash equivalents, which can be used for working capital needs and other commitments and may be used for future real estate investments. We also have a credit facility with unused capacity of up to $210,000 available as of December 31, 2005, which is also available to meet working capital needs and other commitments. In addition, debt may be incurred on unleveraged properties with a carrying value of $240,401 as of December 31, 2005 and any proceeds may be used to finance future real estate investments. During 2005, we took advantage of low long-term interest rates by refinancing or placing new fixed rate financing on several properties totaling approximately $66,400 at a weighted average interest rate of 5.10% for an average term of 9 years. Net proceeds from these financings were primarily used to pay down short-term variable rate debt outstanding on our credit facility. We continue to evaluate other fixed-rate financing options, such as obtaining limited recourse financing on our unleveraged properties. Any financing obtained may be used for working capital objectives and may be used to pay down existing debt balances. The credit facility has financial covenants requiring us, among other things, to maintain a minimum equity value and to meet or exceed certain operating and coverage ratios. We are in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2005. Advances are prepayable at any time. Amounts drawn on the credit facility, which expires in May 2007, bear interest at a rate of either (i) the one, two, three or six-month LIBOR, plus a spread which ranges from 0.6% to 1.45% depending on leverage or corporate credit rating or (ii) the greater of the bank’s Prime Rate and the Federal Funds Effective Rate, plus .50%, plus a spread of up to .125% depending on our leverage ratio. DECEMBER 31, 2005 DECEMBER 31, 2004 MAXIMUM OUTSTANDING MAXIMUM OUTSTANDING AVAILABLE BALANCE AVAILABLE BALANCE Credit Facility (1) $225,000 $15,000 $225,000 $102,000 (1) We have a credit facility for a $175,000 line of credit, which matures in May 2007. This facility provides us the right, on up to two occasions through May 27, 2006, to increase the amount available under the line of credit by not less than $20,000 and not more than $50,000 up to a maximum of $225,000. We own approximately 780,000 shares of Meristar Hospitality Corp. In February 2006, Blackstone Group announced a deal to buy Meristar for $10.45 per share. Based on the proposed purchase price, we will receive approximately $8,150 and expect to record a gain of approximately $4,800 once this deal is completed, exclud- ing impairment charges totaling $11,345 previously recognized against this investment. 21 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Cash Requirements During the next twelve months, cash requirements will include paying distributions to shareholders, scheduled mortgage principal payments, including mortgage balloon payments totaling $14,632 with $10,299 due in June 2006 and $4,333 due in July 2006, making distributions to minority partners as well as other normal recurring operating expenses. We may also seek to use our cash to invest in new properties, to repurchase shares under our share repurchase program and maintain cash balances sufficient to meet working capital needs. We may issue additional shares in connection with investments in real estate when it is consistent with the objectives of the seller. We have budgeted capital expenditures of up to approximately $1,550 at various properties during 2006. The capital expenditures will primarily be for tenant and property improvements in order to enhance a prop- erty’s cash flow or marketability for re-leasing or sale. We expect to meet our capital requirements to fund future investments, any capital expenditures on existing properties and scheduled debt maturities on limited recourse mortgages through use of our cash reserves or unused amounts on our credit facility. Aggregate Contractual Agreements The table below summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005 and the effect that such obli- gations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods. Total Mortgage notes payable — Principal $231,113 Mortgage notes payable — Interest (1) Credit facility — Principal Credit facility — Interest (1) Deferred acquisition revenue due to affiliates — Principal Deferred acquisition revenue due to affiliates — Interest Operating leases (2) 73,397 15,000 1,057 1,185 119 29,680 Less than 1 Year $15,394 14,227 — 746 524 71 2,008 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than 5 years $44,942 $56,367 $114,410 24,383 15,000 311 656 48 5,265 16,129 18,658 — — 5 — — — — — 5,575 16,832 $351,551 $32,970 $90,605 $78,076 $149,900 (1) Interest on variable rate debt obligations was calculated using the variable interest rate as of December 31, 2005. (2) Operating lease obligations consist primarily of the total minimum rents payable on the lease for our principal offices. We are reimbursed by affiliates for their share of the minimum rents under an office cost-sharing agreement. Such amounts are allocated among the entities, based on gross revenues and are adjusted quarterly. Amounts related to our foreign operations are based on the exchange rate of the Euro as of December 31, 2005. The Company has employment contracts with several senior executives. These contracts provide for sever- ance payments in the event of termination under certain conditions. As of December 31, 2005, we have no material capital lease obligations for which we are the lessee, either individually or in the aggregate. We and Carey Financial Corporation (“Carey Financial”), our wholly-owned broker-dealer subsidiary, are cur- rently subject to an SEC investigation into payments made to third-party broker-dealers in connection with the distribution of REITs managed by us and other matters. Although no regulatory action has been initiated against us or Carey Financial in connection with the matters being investigated, we expect that the Commission may 22 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC pursue an action in the future. The potential timing of any such action and the nature of the relief or remedies the Commission may seek cannot be predicted at this time. If such an action is brought, it could materially affect our cash requirements. See the Commitments and Contingencies footnote in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. In connection with the purchase of many of our properties, we required the sellers to perform environmental reviews. We believe, based on the results of such reviews, that our properties were in substantial compliance with Federal and state environmental statutes at the time the properties were acquired. However, portions of certain properties have been subject to some degree of contamination, principally in connection with leakage from underground storage tanks, surface spills or historical on-site activities. In most instances where contami- nation has been identified, tenants are actively engaged in the remediation process and addressing identified conditions. Tenants are generally subject to environmental statutes and regulations regarding the discharge of hazardous materials and any related remediation obligations. In addition, our leases generally require tenants to indemnify us from all liabilities and losses related to the leased properties with provisions of such indemnifica- tion specifically addressing environmental matters. The leases generally include provisions that allow for periodic environmental assessments, paid for by the tenant, and allow us to extend leases until such time as a tenant has satisfied its environmental obligations. Certain of our leases allow us to require financial assurances from tenants such as performance bonds or letters of credit if the costs of remediating environmental conditions are, in our estimation, in excess of specified amounts. Accordingly, we believe that the ultimate resolution of environmental matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations. Critical Accounting Estimates Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. Many of these accounting policies require certain judgment and the use of certain estimates and assumptions when applying these policies in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate these estimates and judgments based on historical experience as well as other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates are subject to change in the future if underlying assumptions or factors change. Certain accounting policies, while significant, may not require the use of esti- mates. Those accounting policies that require significant estimation and/or judgment are listed below. Classification of Real Estate Assets We classify our directly owned leased assets for financial reporting purposes or when significant lease items are amended as either real estate leased under the operating method or net investment in direct financing leases at the inception of a lease. This classification is based on several criteria, including, but not limited to, estimates of the remaining economic life of the leased assets and the calculation of the present value of future minimum rents. In determining the classification of a lease, we use estimates of remaining economic life provided by third party appraisals of the leased assets. The calculation of the present value of future minimum rents includes determining a lease’s implicit interest rate, which requires an estimate of the residual value of leased assets as of the end of the non-cancelable lease term. Different estimates of residual value result in different implicit inter- est rates and could possibly affect the financial reporting classification of leased assets. The contractual terms of our leases are not necessarily different for operating and direct financing leases; however the classification is based on accounting pronouncements which are intended to indicate whether the risks and rewards of owner- ship are retained by the lessor or substantially transferred to the lessee. Management believes that it retains certain risks of ownership regardless of accounting classification. Assets classified as net investment in direct 23 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t financing leases are not depreciated and, therefore, the classification of assets may have a significant impact on net income even though it has no effect on cash flows. Identification of Tangible and Intangible Assets in Connection with Real Estate Acquisitions In connection with the acquisition of properties, purchase costs are allocated to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their estimated fair values. The value of tangible assets, consisting of land, buildings and tenant improvements, is determined as if vacant. Intangible assets including the above-market value of leases, the value of in-place leases and the value of tenant relationships are recorded at their relative fair values. Below-market value of leases are also recorded at their relative fair values and are recorded as liabili- ties in the accompanying financial statements. The value attributed to tangible assets is determined in part using a discount cash flow model which is intended to approximate what a third party would pay to purchase the property as vacant and rent at current “market” rates. In applying the model, we assume that the disinterested party would sell the property at the end of a market lease term. Assumptions used in the model are property-specific as it is available; however, when certain necessary information is not available, we will use available regional and property-type information. Assumptions and estimates include a discount rate or internal rate of return, marketing period necessary to put a lease in place, carrying costs during the marketing period, leasing commissions and tenant improvements allowances, market rents and growth factors of such rents, market lease term and a cap rate to be applied to an estimate of market rent at the end of the market lease term. Above-market and below-market lease intangibles are based on the difference between the market rent and the contractual rents and are discounted to a present value using an interest rate reflecting our current assess- ment of the risk associated with the lease acquired. We acquire properties subject to net leases and consider the credit of the lessee in negotiating the initial rent. The total amount of other intangibles is allocated to in-place lease values and tenant relationship intangible values based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with each tenant. Characteristics we consider in allocating these values include the expectation of lease renewals, nature and extent of the existing relationship with the tenant, prospects for developing new business with the tenant and the tenant’s credit quality, among other factors. Intangibles for above-market and below- market leases, in-place lease intangibles and tenant relationships are amortized over their estimated useful lives. In the event that a lease is terminated, the unamortized portion of each intangible, including market rate adjustments, in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, are charged to expense. Factors considered include the estimated carrying costs of the property during a hypothetical expected lease- up period, current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. Estimated carrying costs include real estate taxes, insurance, other property operating costs, expectation of funding tenant improvements and esti- mates of lost rentals at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, based on assessments of specific market conditions. Estimated costs to execute leases include commissions and legal costs to the extent that such costs are not already incurred with a new lease that has been negotiated in connection with the pur- chase of the property. Basis of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the Company, our wholly owned and majority owned controlled subsidiaries and two variable interest entities (“VIE”) in which we are the primary beneficiary. All material inter-entity transactions have been eliminated. 24 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC For acquisitions of an interest in an entity or newly formed joint venture or limited liability company, we evaluate the entity to determine if the entity is deemed a VIE, and if we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary, in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46(R)”). Entities that meet one or more of the criteria listed below are considered VIEs. • Our equity investment is not sufficient to allow the entity to finance its activities without additional third party financing; • We do not have the direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entity’s business; • We are not obligated to absorb the expected losses of the entity; • We do not have the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and • Our voting rights are not proportionate to our economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activi- ties either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We consolidate the entities that are VIEs when we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE. For entities where we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and our ownership is 50% or less and we have the ability to exercise significant influence as well as jointly-controlled tenancy-in-common inter- ests we use the equity accounting method, i.e. at cost, increased or decreased by our share of earnings or losses, less distributions. When events occur, we will reconsider our determination of whether an entity is a VIE and who the primary beneficiary is to determine if there is a change in the original determinations. Beginning in 2004, we accounted for our interest in CPA®:16 — Global under the equity method. For 2003, the financial statements of CPA®:16 — Global, which was formed in June 2003, were included in our con- solidated financial statements, as we owned all of CPA®:16 — Global’s outstanding common stock. The consolidated financial statements also include the accounts of Corporate Property Associates International Incorporated (“CPAI”), which was formed in July 2003. We own all of CPAI’s outstanding common stock. During 2005, CPAI withdrew its registration statement with the SEC for a public offering of its common stock and as a result, wrote off approximately $811 in organization costs. We have interests in five joint ventures that are consolidated and have minority interests that have finite lives and were considered mandatorily redeemable non-controlling interests prior to the issuance of FSP 150-3. As a result of the deferral provisions of FSP 150-3, these minority interests have not been reflected as liabilities. Impairments Impairment charges may be recognized on long-lived assets, including but not limited to, real estate, direct financing leases, assets held for sale, goodwill and equity investments. Estimates and judgments are used when evaluating whether these assets are impaired. When events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carry- ing amount of an asset may not be recoverable, we perform projections of undiscounted cash flows, and if such cash flows are insufficient, the assets are adjusted (i.e., written down) to their estimated fair value. An analysis of whether a real estate asset has been impaired requires us to make our best estimate of market rents, residual values and holding periods. In our evaluations, we generally obtain market information from outside sources; however, such information requires us to determine whether the information received is appropriate to the cir- cumstances. As our investment objective is to hold properties on a long-term basis, holding periods used in the analyses generally range from five to ten years. Depending on the assumptions made and estimates used, the future cash flow projected in the evaluation of long-lived assets can vary within a range of outcomes. We will consider the likelihood of possible outcomes in determining the best possible estimate of future cash flows. Because in most cases, each of our properties is leased to one tenant, we are more likely to incur significant writedowns when circumstances change because of the possibility that a property will be vacated in its entirety and, therefore, it is different from the risks related to leasing and managing multi-tenant properties. Events or 25 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t changes in circumstances can result in further non-cash writedowns and impact the gain or loss ultimately real- ized upon sale of the assets. We perform a review of our estimate of residual value of our direct financing leases at least annually to deter- mine whether there has been an other than temporary decline in the current estimate of residual value of the underlying real estate assets (i.e., the estimate of what we could realize upon sale of the property at the end of the lease term). If the review indicates a decline in residual value, that is other than temporary, a loss is recog- nized and the accounting for the direct financing lease will be revised to reflect the decrease in the expected yield using the changed estimate, that is, a portion of the future cash flow from the lessee will be recognized as a return of principal rather than as revenue. While an evaluation of potential impairment of real estate accounted for under the operating method is determined by a change in circumstances, the evaluation of a direct financing lease can be affected by changes in long-term market conditions even though the obligations of the lessee are being met. Changes in circumstances include, but are not limited to, vacancy of a property not subject to a lease and termination of a lease. We may also assess properties for impairment because a lessee is experiencing financial difficulty and because management expects that there is a reasonable probability that the lease will be terminated in a bankruptcy proceeding or a property remains vacant for a period that exceeds the period anticipated in a prior impairment evaluation. We evaluate goodwill for possible impairment at least annually using a two-step process. To identify any impairment, we first compare the estimated fair value of the reporting unit (management services segment) with our carrying amount, including goodwill. We calculate the estimated fair value of the management serv- ices segment by applying a multiple, based on comparable companies, to earnings. If the fair value of the management services segment exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is considered not impaired and no further analysis is required. If the carrying amount of the management services unit exceeds its estimated fair value, then the second step is performed to measure the amount of the impairment charge. For the second step, we would determine the impairment charge by comparing the implied fair value of the goodwill with its carrying amount and record an impairment charge equal to the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value. The implied fair value of the goodwill is determined by allocating the estimated fair value of the management services segment to its assets and liabilities. The excess of the estimated fair value of the man- agement services segment over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of the goodwill. We have performed our annual test for impairment of our management services segment, the reportable unit of measurement, and concluded that the goodwill is not impaired. Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method and are recorded initially at cost, as equity investments and subsequently adjusted for our proportionate share of earnings and cash contributions and distributions. On a periodic basis, we assess whether there are any indicators that the value of equity investments may be impaired and whether or not that impairment is other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the charge shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the fair value of the investment. When we identify assets as held for sale, we discontinue depreciating the assets and estimate the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. If in our opinion, the net sales price of the assets, which have been identified for sale, is less than the net book value of the assets, an impairment charge is recognized and a valuation allowance is established. To the extent that a purchase and sale agreement has been entered into, the allowance is based on the negotiated sales price. To the extent that we have adopted a plan to sell an asset but have not entered into a sales agreement, we will make judgments of the net sales price based on current market informa- tion. Accordingly, the initial assessment may be greater or less than the purchase price subsequently committed to and may result in a further adjustment to the fair value of the property. If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, we decide not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, 26 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC the property is reclassified as held and used. A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depre- ciation expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used or (b) the fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell. Provision for Uncollected Amounts from Lessees On an ongoing basis, we assess our ability to collect rent and other tenant-based receivables and determine an appropriate allowance for uncollected amounts. Because our real estate operations segment has a limited num- ber of lessees (fewer than 30 lessees represented more than 70% of annual rental income during 2005), we believe that it is necessary to evaluate the collectibility of these receivables based on the facts and circum- stances of each situation rather than solely using statistical methods. We generally recognize a provision for uncollected rents and other tenant receivables and measure our allowance against actual arrearages. For amounts in arrears, we make subjective judgments based on our knowledge of a lessee’s circumstances and may reserve for the entire receivable amount from a lessee because there has been significant or continuing deterio- ration in the lessee’s ability to meet its lease obligations. Determination of Certain Asset Based Management and Performance Revenue We earn asset-based management and performance revenue for providing property management, leasing, advisory and other services to the CPA® REIT’s. For certain CPA® REIT’s, this revenue is based on third party annual valuations of the underlying real estate assets of the CPA® REIT. The valuation uses estimates, includ- ing but not limited to, market rents, residual values and increases in the CPI and discount rates. Differences in the assumptions applied would affect the amount of revenue that we recognize. Additionally, a deferred com- pensation plan for certain officers is valued based on the results of the annual valuations. The effect of any changes in the annual valuations will affect both revenue and compensation expense and therefore the deter- mination of net income. Income Taxes Significant judgment is required in developing our provision for income taxes, including (i) the determination of partnership-level state and local taxes and foreign taxes, and (ii) for our taxable subsidiaries, estimating deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance that might be required against the deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is required if it is more likely than not that a portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We have not recorded a valuation allowance based on our current belief that operat- ing income of the taxable subsidiaries will be sufficient to realize the benefit of these assets over time. For interim periods, income tax expense for taxable subsidiaries is determined, in part, by applying an effective tax rate, which takes into account statutory federal, state and local tax rates. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) is an amendment of SFAS 123(R) and requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. The cost is required to be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. SFAS 123(R) also contains additional minimum disclosure requirements that include, but are not limited to, the valuation method and assumptions used, amounts of compensation capitalized and modifications made. The effective date of SFAS 123(R) was subsequently amended by the SEC to be as of the beginning of the first reporting period of fiscal years beginning on or after 27 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t December 15, 2005, and allows several different methods of transition. We adopted SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective application method. Based on total non-vested awards as of December 31, 2005, we expect to record compensation expense of approximately $1,200 during 2006. In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47 “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” (“FIN 47”). FIN 47 requires an entity to recognize a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 clarifies that the term “Condi- tional Asset Retirement Obligation” refers to a legal obligation (pursuant to existing laws or by contract) to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 was effective no later than fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. We adopted FIN 47 as required effective December 31, 2005 and the initial application of this Interpretation did not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations. In June 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF 04-05, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights” (“EITF 04-05”). The scope of EITF 04-05 is limited to limited partnerships or similar entities that are not variable interest entities under FIN 46(R). The Task Force reached a consensus that the general partners in a limited partnership (or similar entity) are presumed to control the entity regard- less of the level of their ownership and, accordingly, may be required to consolidate the entity. This presumption may be overcome if the agreements provide the limited partners with either (a) the substantive ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partners without cause or (b) substantive participating rights. If it is deemed that the limited partners’ rights overcome the presumption of control by a general partner of the limited partnership, the general partner shall account for its investment in the limited partnership using the equity method of accounting. EITF 04-05 was effective immediately for all arrangements created or modified after June 29, 2005. For all other arrangements, application of EITF 04-05 is required effective for the first reporting period in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005 (i.e., effective January 1, 2006 for us) using either a cumulative-effect-type adjustment or using a retrospective application. We do not believe that the adoption of EITF 04-05 will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. In October 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 13-1 “Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred during a Construction Period” (“FSP FAS 13-1”). FSP FAS 13-1 addresses the accounting for rental costs associated with operating leases that are incurred during the construction period. FSP FAS 13-1 makes no distinction between the right to use a leased asset during the construction period and the right to use that asset after the construction period. Therefore, rental costs associated with ground or building operating leases that are incurred during a construction period shall be recognized as rental expense, allocated over the lease term in accordance with SFAS No. 13 and Technical Bulletin 85-3. FSP FAS 13-1 is effective for the first reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005. We adopted FSP FAS 13-1 as required on January 1, 2006 and the initial application of this Staff Position did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. 28 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk (In thousands) Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices. In pursuing our business plan, the primary risks to which we are exposed are interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk. Interest Rate Risk The value of our real estate is subject to fluctuations based on changes in interest rates, local and regional eco- nomic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of lessees, all which may affect our ability to refinance property-level mortgage debt when balloon payments are scheduled. At December 31, 2005, $181,116 of our long-term debt bears interest at fixed rates, and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in the market interest rates. The following table presents prin- cipal cash flows based upon expected maturity dates of the debt obligations and the related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates for the fixed rate debt. Interest on fixed rate debt as of December 31, 2005 ranged from 4.87% to 10.125%. The interest rates on variable rate debt as of December 31, 2005 ranged from 4.49% to 6.44%. Advances from the line of credit, which expires in 2007, bear interest at an annual rate of either (i) the one, two, three or six-month LIBOR, plus a spread which ranges from 0.6% to 1.45% depending on leverage or cor- porate credit rating or (ii) the greater of the bank’s Prime Rate and the Federal Funds Effective Rate, plus .50%, plus a spread of up to .125% depending on our leverage ratio. 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Thereafter Total Fair Value Fixed rate debt $12,999 $24,744 $9,625 $36,627 $13,448 $83,673 $181,116 $180,190 Weighted average interest rate Variable rate debt 7.21% 7.84% 7.32% 7.30% 7.61% 5.65% $02,395 $17,648 $7,925 $03,101 $03,191 $30,737 $064,997 $064,997 Annual interest expense would increase or decrease on variable rate debt by approximately $650 for each 1% increase or decrease in interest rates. A change in interest rates of 1% would impact the fair value of our fixed rate debt at December 31, 2005 by approximately $3,296. Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk We have foreign operations in France and as such are subject to risk from the effects of exchange rate move- ments of the Euro, which may affect future costs and cash flows. We are a net receiver of the Euro (we receive more cash than we pay out) and therefore our foreign operations benefit from a weaker U.S. dollar and are adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to the Euro. For the year ended December 31, 2005, we rec- ognized $19 in foreign currency transaction losses in connection with the transfer of cash from foreign operating subsidiaries to the parent company. The cash received was subsequently converted into dollars. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2005, we recognized net unrealized foreign currency losses of $830. The cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment reflects a loss of $835. To date, we have not entered 29 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t into any foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Scheduled future minimum rents, exclusive of renewals, under non-cancelable operating leases and sched- uled principal payments for mortgage notes payable for our foreign operations during each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Thereafter Total Minimum rents (1) $5,863 $5,820 $5,362 $4,772 $3,115 $06,718 $31,650 Mortgage notes payable (1) 2,395 2,648 2,925 3,101 3,191 30,738 44,998 (1) Based on the December 31, 2005 exchange rate for the Euro. 30 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of W. P. Carey & Co. LLC: We have completed integrated audits of W. P. Carey & Co. LLC’s 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and an audit of its 2003 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below. Consolidated financial statements In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of W. P. Carey & Co. LLC and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Internal control over financial reporting Also, in our opinion, management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that the Company maintained effective internal control over finan- cial reporting as of December 31, 2005 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effec- tiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our 31 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial report- ing was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reason- able detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial state- ments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstate- ments. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. March 8, 2006 32 Consolidated Balance Sheets (In thousands except share amounts) Assets Real estate, net Net investment in direct financing leases Equity investments Operating real estate, net Assets held for sale Cash and cash equivalents Due from affiliates Goodwill Intangible assets, net Other assets, net Total assets Liabilities, Minority Interest and Members’ Equity Liabilities: Mortgage notes payable Mortgage notes payable on assets held for sale Credit facility Accrued interest Dividends payable Due to affiliates Accounts payable and accrued expenses Prepaid rental income and security deposits Accrued income taxes Deferred income taxes, net Other liabilities Total liabilities Minority interest Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) Members’ Equity: Listed shares, no par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 37,706,247 and 37,523,462 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004 Dividends in excess of accumulated earnings Unearned compensation Accumulated other comprehensive income Total members’ equity W. P. Carey & Co. LLC December 31, 2005 2004 $(454,478 131,975 134,567 7,865 18,815 13,014 82,933 63,607 40,700 35,308 $(983,262 $(226,701 4,412 15,000 2,036 16,963 2,994 23,002 4,391 634 39,908 36,064 372,105 3,689 $0,476,365 190,644 110,379 9,140 12,802 16,715 63,471 63,607 50,501 19,915 $1,013,539 $0,190,698 — 102,000 1,389 16,626 2,033 19,838 4,881 3,909 38,359 11,748 391,481 1,407 740,593 (131,178) (5,119) 3,172 607,468 734,658 (112,441) (5,366) 3,800 620,651 Total liabilities, minority interest and members’ equity $(983,262 $1,013,539 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 33 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Consolidated Statements of Income (In thousands, except per share and share amounts) Revenues: Asset management revenue Structuring revenue Rental income Interest income from direct financing leases Incentive and subordinated disposition revenue from CIP® merger Other operating income Revenues of other business operations Operating Expenses: General and administrative Depreciation Amortization Property expenses Impairment charges and loan losses Operating expenses of other business operations Other Income and Expenses: Other interest income Income from equity investments Minority interest in income Gain on foreign currency transactions and other gains, net Interest expense Income from continuing operations before income taxes Provision for income taxes Income from continuing operations Discontinued Operations: Income from operations of discontinued properties Gains on sale of real estate, net Impairment charges on properties held for sale Income (loss) from discontinued operations Net income Basic Earnings per Share: Income from continuing operations Income (loss) from discontinued operations Net income Diluted Earnings per Share: Income from continuing operations Income (loss) from discontinued operations Net income Dividends Declared per Share Weighted Average Shares Outstanding: Basic Diluted The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 34 For the years ended December 31, 2005 2004 2003 $ 62,294 28,197 52,386 17,149 — 6,592 7,499 174,117 $ 61,194 45,168 44,817 17,580 42,095 5,623 5,725 222,202 $ 56,402 31,658 40,558 17,118 — 5,211 3,098 154,045 (55,184) (11,939) (8,813) (7,396) (15,154) (6,327) (104,813) 3,511 5,182 (264) 1,305 (16,787) (7,053) 62,251 (19,390) 42,861 (50,985) (10,954) (10,074) (5,577) (12,899) (6,261) (96,750) 3,127 5,308 (1,499) 1,222 (14,488) (6,330) 119,122 (50,983) 68,139 (43,695) (8,939) (7,259) (5,745) (1,480) (1,209) (68,327) 2,581 4,008 (370) 48 (14,660) (8,393) 77,325 (19,116) 58,209 1,885 10,474 (6,616) 5,743 $ 48,604 6,812 89 (9,199) (2,298) $ 65,841 6,391 1,238 (2,960) 4,669 $ 62,878 $ 1.14 .15 $ 1.29 $ 1.82 (.06) $ 1.76 $ 1.59 .13 $ 1.72 $ 1.10 .15 $ 1.25 $ 1.79 $ 1.75 (.06) $ 1.69 $ 1.76 $ 1.52 .12 $ 1.64 $ 1.73 37,688,835 39,020,801 37,417,918 38,961,748 36,566,338 38,434,169 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (in thousands) Net income Other comprehensive income: Change in unrealized appreciation on marketable securities, net of taxes of $327 in 2005, $1,098 in 2004 and $843 in 2003 Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes of $611 in 2005, $122 in 2004 and $(655) in 2003 For the years ended December 31, 2005 2004 2003 $48,604 $65,841 $62,878 722 1,467 (1,350) (628) (163) 1,304 2,567 1,994 4,561 Comprehensive income $47,976 $67,145 $67,439 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 35 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Consolidated Statements of Members’ Equity For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands) Shares Paid-in Capital Dividends in Excess of Accumulated Earnings Unearned Compensation Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income(Loss) Total Balance at January 1, 2003 35,944,110 $ 690,594 $ (111,970) $ (5,671) $ (2,065) $ 570,888 Cash proceeds on issuance of shares, net Shares issued in connection with services rendered and properties acquired Shares issued in connection with prior acquisition 412,012 7,789 5,846 160 400,000 8,909 Shares and options issued under share incentive plans 47,550 Forfeitures (9,726) 1,212 (132) 2,700 (63,478) (2,827) 99 3,536 (54,765) (1,508) 62,878 Dividends declared Tax benefit — share incentive plans Amortization of unearned compensation Repurchase and retirement of shares Net income Change in other comprehensive income Balance at December 31, 2003 36,745,027 709,724 (112,570) (4,863) Cash proceeds on issuance of shares, net Shares issued in connection with services rendered Shares issued in connection with prior acquisition 274,262 6,649 8,938 271 500,000 13,734 Shares and options issued under share incentive plans 118,683 Forfeitures (32,869) Dividends declared Tax benefit — share incentive plans Amortization of unearned compensation 36 3,538 (138) 3,423 (65,712) (4,409) 138 3,768 7,789 160 8,909 (1,615) (33) (63,478) 2,700 3,536 (1,508) 62,878 4,561 2,496 4,561 594,787 6,649 271 13,734 (871) — (65,712) 3,423 3,768 (continued) Consolidated Statements of Members’ Equity (Continued) For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands) Shares Paid-in Capital Dividends in Excess of Accumulated Earnings Unearned Compensation Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income(Loss) Repurchase and retirement of shares Net income Change in other comprehensive income (90,579) (2,543) 65,841 Balance at December 31, 2004 37,523,462 734,658 (112,441) (5,366) Cash proceeds on issuance of shares, net Shares issued in connection with services rendered 182,273 4,400 7,288 217 Shares and options issued under share incentive plans 101,300 Forfeitures (14,301) 3,422 (502) 604 (67,341) (3,422) 459 3,210 Dividends declared Tax benefit — share incentive plans Amortization of unearned compensation Repurchase and retirement of shares Net income Change in other comprehensive income (93,775) (2,206) 48,604 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC Total (2,543) 65,841 1,304 3,800 1,304 620,651 4,400 217 — (43) (67,341) 604 3,210 (2,206) 48,604 (628) (628) Balance at December 31, 2005 37,706,247 $ 740,593 $ (131,178) $ (5,119) $ 3,172 $ 607,468 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 37 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Revised) (In thousands) Cash flows from operating activities: Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets and deferred financing costs Distribution received in excess of accumulated earnings and equity income in excess of distributions Gain on sales of real estate and securities, net Recognition of deferred gain on completion of development project Minority interest in income Straight-line rent adjustments Management income received in shares of affiliates Unrealized loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions and warrants Impairment charges and loan losses Deferred income taxes Realized loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions Costs paid by issuance of shares (Decrease) increase in accrued taxes payable Tax charge — share incentive plans Amortization of unearned compensation Deferred acquisition revenue received Increase in structuring revenue receivable Net changes in other operating assets and liabilities Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Distributions received from equity investments in excess of equity income Capital distributions from equity investment Purchases of real estate and equity investments Capital expenditures Purchase of investment Payment of deferred acquisition revenue to affiliate Release of funds from escrow in connection with the sale of a property Proceeds from sales of property and investments Cash acquired on acquisition of subsidiary Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities Cash flows from financing activities: Dividends paid Contributions from minority interests Distributions to minority interests Scheduled payments of mortgage principal Proceeds from mortgages and credit facility Prepayments of mortgage principal and credit facility Payment of financing costs Proceeds from issuance of shares Retirement of shares Net cash used in financing activities Effect of exchange rate changes on cash Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 38 For the years ended December 31, 2005 2004 2003 $ 48,604 $ 65,841 $ 62,878 21,623 22,298 19,340 479 (10,570) (2,000) 264 3,776 (31,858) 779 21,770 1,549 19 201 (3,274) 604 3,936 8,961 (5,304) (6,852) 52,707 6,164 — — (2,975) (465) (524) — 45,542 — 47,742 (67,004) 1,539 (355) (9,229) 121,764 (151,893) (797) 4,400 (2,206) (103,781) (369) (3,701) 16,715 $ 13,014 (793) (90) — 1,499 1,732 (20,999) (790) 22,098 8,827 (430) 168 2,099 3,423 3,768 5,978 (14,860) (920) 98,849 6,933 — (115,522) (1,596) — (524) 7,185 6,548 — (96,976) (65,073) — (1,101) (9,428) 170,000 (106,962) (1,238) 6,649 (2,543) (9,696) 179 (7,644) 24,359 $ 16,715 (23) (660) — 370 74 (18,599) (130) 4,440 9,769 (556) 215 (3,475) 2,700 3,536 1,495 (13,424) (655) 67,295 3,503 6,582 (8,184) (2,843) — (524) — 24,395 1,300 24,229 (62,978) — — (8,548) 82,683 (107,854) (391) 7,789 — (89,299) 830 3,055 21,304 $ 24,359 (continued) W. P. Carey & Co. LLC Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Revised) (Continued) (In thousands except share and per share amounts) Non-cash investing and financing activities: A. In connection with the acquisition of Carey Management LLC (“Carey Management”) in June 2000, the Company had an obligation to issue up to an additional 2,000,000 shares over four years if specified per- formance criteria were achieved. As of December 31, 2004, 1,900,000 shares had been issued and our obligation has been satisfied. Based on the performance criteria 500,000 shares were issued for the years ended December 31, 2003 valued at $13,734. The amounts attributable to the 1,900,000 shares are included in goodwill. Accounts payable to affiliates as of December 31, 2003 includes $13,734 for shares that were issued in 2004. B. The Company issued restricted shares valued at $217 in 2005, $271 in 2004 and $160 in 2003, to certain directors in consideration of service rendered. Restricted shares and stock options valued at $3,422, $3,538 and $3,697 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, issued to officers and employees and was recorded as unearned compensation of which $459, $138 and $99, respectively, was forfeited in 2005, 2004 and 2003. Included in compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $3,210, $3,768 and $3,536, respectively, relating to equity awards from the Company’s share incentive plans. C. During 2004, the Company acquired interests in 17 properties from Carey Institutional Properties Incorporated with a fair value of $142,161, for approximately $115,158 in cash and the assumption of approximately $27,003 in limited recourse mortgage notes payable. The fair value of the assumed mortgages was $27,756. D. As partial consideration for the sale of a property in 2003, the Company received notes receivable with a fair value of $2,250. During 2004, $7,185 was released from an escrow account from the sale of a property in 2003. E. In April 2003, the Company’s ownership interest in W. P. Carey International LLC (“WPCI”), increased from 10% to 100% at which time WPCI transferred 54,765 shares back to the Company and WPCI redeemed the interests of William P. Carey, Chairman and then Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, who had owned a 90% interest in WPCI. As a result of increasing its interest in WPCI to 100%, the Company acquired assets and liabilities of WPCI as follows: (see Note 3) Intangible assets (management contracts) Equity investments Due to affiliates (including $1,898 due to William P. Carey) Other assets and liabilities, net Net cash acquired Supplemental Cash Flows Information: Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized Income taxes paid Interest capitalized The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. $ 679 324 (2,559) 256 $ 1,300 Years ended December 31, 2005 2004 2003 $ 15,579 $ 20,989 $ — $ 13,901 $ 36,944 $ — $ 14,395 $ 9,074 $ 22 39 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (In thousands except share and per share amounts) 1 Business and Organization W. P. Carey & Co. LLC (the “Company”) is a real estate and advisory company that invests in commercial properties leased to companies domestically and internationally, and earns revenue as the advisor to affiliated real estate investment trusts (“CPA® REITs”) that each make similar investments. Under the advisory agree- ments with the CPA® REITs, the Company performs services related to the day-to-day management of the CPA® REITs and transaction-related services. As of December 31, 2005, the Company owns and manages 172 commercial properties net leased to 110 tenants and totaling more than 17 million square feet. In addition, the Company currently manages 835 properties on behalf of the CPA® REITs: Corporate Property Associates 12 Incorporated (“CPA®:12”), Corporate Property Associates 14 Incorporated (“CPA®:14”), Corporate Property Associates 15 Incorporated (“CPA®:15”), Corporate Property Associates 16 — Global Incorporated (“CPA®:16 — Global”) and served in this capacity for Carey Institutional Properties Incorporated (“CIP®”) until its merger with CPA®:15 during 2004. The Company’s Primary Business Segments MANAGEMENT SERVICES — The Company provides services to the CPA® REITs in connection with structuring and negotiating investment and debt placement transactions (structuring revenue) and provides on- going management of the portfolio (asset-based management and performance revenue). Asset-based management and performance revenue for the CPA® REITs are determined based on real estate related assets under management. As funds available to the CPA® REITs are invested, the asset base for which the Company earns revenue increases. The Company may elect to receive revenue in cash or restricted shares of the CPA® REITs. The Company may also earn incentive and disposition revenue in connection with providing liquidity alternatives to CPA® REIT shareholders. REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS — The Company invests in commercial properties that are then leased to companies domestically and internationally. Organization The Company commenced operations on January 1, 1998 by combining the limited partnership interests in nine CPA® Partnerships, at which time the Company listed on the New York Stock Exchange. On June 28, 2000, the Company acquired the net lease real estate management operations of Carey Management from William P. Carey (“Carey”), Chairman and then Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, subsequent to receiving shareholder approval. The assets acquired included the advisory agreements with four affiliated CPA® REITs, the Company’s management agreement, the stock of an affiliated broker-dealer, investments in the com- mon stock of the CPA® REITs, and certain office furniture, fixtures, equipment and employees required to carry on the business operations of Carey Management. The purchase price consisted of the initial issuance of 8,000,000 shares with an additional 2,000,000 shares issuable over four years if specified performance criteria were achieved through a period ended December 31, 2004 (of which 1,900,000 shares were issued representing an aggregate value of $41,229). The initial 8,000,000 shares issued were restricted from resale for a period of up to three years and the additional shares are subject to Section 144 regulations. The acquisition of the interests 40 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC in Carey Management was accounted for as a purchase and was recorded at the fair value of the initial 8,000,000 shares issued. The total initial purchase price was approximately $131,300 including the issuance of 8,000,000 shares, transaction costs of $2,605, the acquisition of Carey Management’s minority interests in the CPA® partnerships and the value of restricted shares and options issued in respect of the interests of certain offi- cers in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan of Carey Management. The purchase price was allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired based upon their fair market values. Intangible assets acquired, including the advisory agreements with the CPA® REITs, the Company’s manage- ment agreement and the trade name (reclassified to goodwill on January 1, 2002), were determined pursuant to a third party valuation. The value of the advisory agreements and the management agreement were based on a discounted cash flow analysis of projected revenue. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the identified tangible and intangible assets has been recorded as goodwill. The value of additional shares issued under the acquisition agreement is recognized as additional purchase price and recorded as goodwill. Issuances based on performance criteria are valued based on the market price of the shares on the date when the perform- ance criteria are achieved. 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the Company, its wholly owned and majority owned controlled subsidiaries and two variable interest entities (“VIE”) in which it is the primary beneficiary. All material inter- entity transactions have been eliminated. For acquisitions of an interest in an entity or newly formed joint venture or limited liability company, the Company evaluates the entity to determine if the entity is deemed a VIE, and if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46(R)”). Entities that meet one or more of the criteria listed below are considered VIEs. • The Company’s equity investment is not sufficient to allow the entity to finance its activities without additional third party financing; • The Company does not have the direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entity’s business; • The Company is not obligated to absorb the expected losses of the entity; • The Company does not have the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and • The Company’s voting rights are not proportionate to its economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. The Company consolidates the entities that are VIEs when the Company is deemed to be the primary bene- ficiary of the VIE. For entities where the Company is not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and the Company’s ownership is 50% or less and it has the ability to exercise significant influence as well as jointly- controlled tenancy-in-common interests, the Company uses the equity accounting method, i.e. at cost, increased or decreased by the Company’s share of earnings or losses, less distributions. When events occur, the Company will reconsider its determination of whether an entity is a VIE and who the primary beneficiary is to determine if there is a change in the original determinations. Beginning in 2004, the Company accounted for its interest in CPA®:16 — Global under the equity method. For 2003, the financial statements of CPA®:16 — Global, which was formed in June 2003, were included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, as the Company owned all of CPA®:16 — Global’s outstanding 41 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t common stock. The consolidated financial statements also include the accounts of Corporate Property Associates International Incorporated (“CPAI”), which was formed in July 2003. The Company owns all of CPAI’s outstanding common stock. During 2005, CPAI withdrew its registration statement with the SEC for a public offering of its common stock and as a result, wrote off approximately $811 in organization costs. The Company has interests in five joint ventures that are consolidated and have minority interests that have finite lives and were considered mandatorily redeemable non-controlling interests prior to the issuance of FSP 150-3. As a result of the deferral provisions of FSP 150-3, these minority interests have not been reflected as liabilities. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Reclassification and Revisions Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year financial statement presenta- tion. The consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report have been adjusted to reflect the disposition (or planned disposition) of certain properties as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The Company has revised its 2004 and 2003 consolidated statements of cash flows to present the operating portion of the cash flows attributable to our discontinued operations on a combined basis. Purchase Price Allocation In connection with the Company’s acquisition of properties, purchase costs are allocated to the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their estimated fair values. The value of the tangible assets, consisting of land, buildings and tenant improvements, are determined as if vacant. Intangible assets including the above-market value of leases, the value of in-place leases and the value of tenant relationships are recorded at their relative fair values. Below-market value of leases are also recorded at their relative fair values and are recorded as liabilities in the accompanying financial statements. Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for owned properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate reflecting the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the leases negotiated and in-place at the time of acquisition of the properties and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the property or equiv- alent property, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above-market lease value is amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable term of each lease. The capitalized below-market lease value is amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial term and any fixed rate renewal periods in the respective leases. The total amount of other intangibles are allocated to in-place lease values and tenant relationship intangi- ble values based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with each tenant. Characteristics that are considered in allocating these values include the nature and extent of the existing relationship with the tenant, prospects for developing new busi- ness with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and the expectation of lease renewals among other factors. Third party appraisals or management’s estimates are used to determine these values. Intangibles for above- market and below-market leases, in-place lease intangibles and tenant relationships are amortized over their 42 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC estimated useful lives. In the event that a lease is terminated the unamortized portion of each intangible, including market rate adjustments, in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, is charged to expense. Factors considered in the analysis include the estimated carrying costs of the property during a hypothetical expected lease-up period, current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. The Company also con- siders information obtained about a property in connection with its pre-acquisition due diligence. Estimated carrying costs include real estate taxes, insurance, other property operating costs and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, based on management’s assessment of specific market conditions. Estimated costs to execute leases including commissions and legal costs to the extent that such costs are not already incurred with a new lease that has been negotiated in connection with the purchase of the property are also considered. The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial term of each lease. The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the initial and expected renewal terms of the leases but no amortization periods for intangibles will exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. Operating Real Estate Land and buildings and personal property are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Renewals and improvements are capitalized, while replacements, maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend the lives of the respective assets are expensed as incurred. Real Estate Under Construction and Redevelopment For properties under construction, operating expenses including interest charges and other property expenses, including real estate taxes, are capitalized rather than expensed and incidental revenue is recorded as a reduction of capitalized project (i.e., construction) costs. Interest is capitalized by applying the interest rate applicable to outstanding borrowings to the average amount of accumulated expenditures for properties under construction during the period. Cash Equivalents The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments that are both readily convertible to cash and have a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Items classified as cash equivalents include money market funds. Substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2005 and 2004 were held in the custody of three financial institutions and which balances, at times, exceed federally insurable limits. The Company mitigates this risk by depositing funds with major finan- cial institutions. Due to Affiliates Included in due to affiliates are deferred acquisition revenue and amounts related to issuable shares for meeting the performance criteria in connection with the acquisition of Carey Management. Deferred acquisition rev- enue is payable for services provided by Carey Management prior to the termination of the management contract, relating to the identification, evaluation, negotiation, financing and purchase of properties. This rev- enue is payable in eight equal annual installments each January following the first anniversary of the date a property was purchased. Other Assets and Liabilities Included in other assets are accrued rents and interest receivable, deferred rent receivable, notes receivable, deferred charges, escrow balances held by lenders, restricted cash balances and marketable securities. Included 43 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t in other liabilities are accrued interest, accounts payable and accrued expenses, security deposits and other amounts held on behalf of tenants, deferred rent, deferred revenue (see Note 3), including unamortized below- market rent intangibles, and minority interests that are subject to redemption. Deferred charges include costs incurred in connection with debt financing and refinancing and are amortized and included in interest expense over the terms of the related debt obligations using the effective interest method. Deferred rent receivable is primarily the aggregate difference for operating method leases between scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and rent recognized on a straight-line basis. Minority interests subject to redemption are recorded at fair value based on a cash flow model with changes in fair value reflected in the determination of net income. Marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale securities and reported at fair value with the Company’s interest in unrealized gains and losses on these securities reported as a component of other comprehensive income until realized. Real Estate Leased to Others Certain of the Company’s real estate is leased to others on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is generally responsible for all operating expenses relating to the property, including property taxes, insurance, mainte- nance, repairs, renewals and improvements. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs including routine betterments are charged to operations as incurred. Significant renovations that increase the useful life of the properties are capitalized. For the year ended December 31, 2005, lessees were responsible for the direct pay- ment of real estate taxes of approximately $7,046. The Company diversifies its real estate investments among various corporate tenants engaged in different industries, by property type and geographically. No lessee currently represents 10% or more of total leasing rev- enues. Substantially all of the Company’s leases provide for either scheduled rent increases, periodic rent increases based on formulas indexed to increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) or sales overrides. Rents from sales overrides (percentage rents) are recognized as reported by the lessees, that is, after the level of sales requiring a rental payment to the Company is reached. The leases are accounted for under either the direct financing or operating methods. Such methods are described below: Direct financing method — Leases accounted for under the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (see Note 5). Unearned income is deferred and amortized to income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on the Company’s net investment in the lease. Operating method — Real estate is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation; minimum rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related leases and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred (see Note 4). On an ongoing basis, the Company assesses its ability to collect rent and other tenant-based receivables and determines an appropriate allowance for uncollected amounts. Because the real estate operations has a limited number of lessees, the Company believes that it is necessary to evaluate the collectibility of these receivables based on the facts and circumstances of each situation rather than solely use statistical methods. The Company generally recognizes a provision for uncollected rents and other tenant receivables and measures its allowance against actual arrearages. For amounts in arrears, the Company makes subjective judgments based on its knowl- edge of a lessee’s circumstances and may reserve for the entire receivable amount from a lessee because there has been significant or continuing deterioration in the lessee’s ability to meet its lease obligations. 44 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC Revenue Recognition The Company earns structuring and asset-based revenue. Structuring and financing revenue are earned for investment banking services provided in connection with the analysis, negotiation and structuring of transac- tions, including acquisitions and dispositions and the placement of mortgage financing obtained by publicly registered real estate investment trusts formed by the Company (the “CPA® REITs”). Asset-based revenue con- sists of property management, leasing and advisory revenue and reimbursement of certain expenses in accordance with the separate management agreements with each CPA® REIT for administrative services pro- vided for operation of such CPA® REIT. Receipt of the incentive revenue portion of the management revenue, however, is subordinated to the achievement of specified cumulative return requirements by the shareholders of the CPA® REITs. The incentive portion of management revenue (“performance revenue”) may be collected in cash or shares of the CPA® REIT at the option of the Company. During 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company elected to receive its earned performance revenue in CPA® REIT shares. Performance revenue of CIP® in the amount of $1,494 was received in cash in 2004. All revenue is recognized as earned. Structuring revenue is earned upon the consummation of a transaction and asset management revenue is earned when services are performed. Revenue subject to subordination is rec- ognized only when the contingencies affecting the payment of such revenue are resolved, that is, when the performance criteria of the CPA® REIT is achieved and contractual limitations are not exceeded. As of December 31, 2005, $800 of structuring revenue from prior year transactions is recorded as deferred revenue in other liabilities, as a limitation which provides that certain structuring revenue cannot exceed 4.5% of the aggregate cost of properties of a CPA® REIT was exceeded. In addition, CPA®:16 — Global did not meet the performance criterion, as defined in the advisory agreements, and therefore, for the year ended December 31, 2005, performance revenue of $3,698 and deferred acquisition revenue of $10,174 have been deferred until the performance criterion is met. The Company also receives reimbursement of certain marketing costs in connection with the sponsorship of a CPA® REIT that is conducting a “best efforts” public offering. Reimbursement income is recorded as the expenses are incurred, subject to limitations on a CPA® REIT’s ability to incur offering costs. Depreciation Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the properties (gen- erally forty years) and for furniture, fixtures and equipment (generally up to seven years). Impairments When events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, the Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets and certain intangible assets based on projections of undiscounted cash flows, without interest charges, over the life of such assets. In the event that such cash flows are insufficient, the assets are adjusted to their estimated fair value. The Company performs a review of its esti- mate of residual value of its direct financing leases at least annually to determine whether there has been an other than temporary decline in the Company’s current estimate of residual value of the underlying real estate assets (i.e., the estimate of what the Company could realize upon sale of the property at the end of the lease term). If the review indicates a decline in residual value that is other than temporary, a loss is recognized and the accounting for the direct financing lease will be revised to reflect the decrease in the expected yield using the changed estimate, that is, a portion of the future cash flow from the lessee will be recognized as a return of principal rather than as revenue. The Company tests goodwill for impairment at least annually using a two-step process. To identify any impairment, the Company first compares the estimated fair value of the reporting unit (management services 45 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t segment) with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company calculates the estimated fair value of the management services segment by applying a multiple, based on comparable companies, to earnings. If the fair value of the management services segment exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is considered not impaired. If the carrying amount of the management services unit exceeds its estimated fair value, then the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. For the second step, the Company would compare the implied fair value of the goodwill with its carrying amount and record an impairment charge for the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value. The implied fair value of the goodwill is determined by allocating the estimated fair value of the management services seg- ment to its assets and liabilities. The excess of the estimated fair value of the management services segment over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of the goodwill. In accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles,” the Company performed its annual tests for impairment of its management services seg- ment, the reportable unit of measurement, and concluded that the goodwill is not impaired. Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method and are recorded initially at cost, and subsequently adjusted for our proportionate share of earnings and cash contributions and distributions. On a periodic basis, we assess whether there are any indicators that the value of equity invest- ments may be impaired and whether or not that impairment is other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the charge shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the fair value of the investment. When the Company identifies assets as held for sale, it discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. If in the Company’s opinion, the net sales price of the assets, which have been identified for sale, is less than the net book value of the assets, an impairment charge is recog- nized and a valuation allowance is established. To the extent that a purchase and sale agreement has been entered into, the allowance is based on the negotiated sales price. To the extent that the Company has adopted a plan to sell an asset but has not entered into a sales agreement, it will make judgments of the net sales price based on current market information. Accordingly, the initial assessment may be greater or less than the pur- chase price subsequently committed to and may result in a further adjustment to the fair value of the property. If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the property is reclassified as held and used. A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used or (b) the fair value at the date of the subsequent deci- sion not to sell. Stock Based Compensation The Company accounts for stock based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related inter- pretations (“APB No. 25”). Under APB No. 25, compensation cost for fixed plans is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company’s shares at the date of grant over the exercise price of the option granted. The Company has granted restricted shares and stock options to substantially all employees. Shares were awarded in the name of the employee, who has all the rights of a shareholder, subject to certain restrictions of transferability and a risk of forfeiture. The forfeiture provisions on the awards expire annually, over their respec- tive vesting periods. Shares and stock options subject to forfeiture provisions have been recorded as unearned 46 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC compensation and are presented as a separate component of members’ equity. Compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock, if any, is recognized over the applicable vesting periods. Grants of restricted stock and options of a subsidiary were awarded to certain of its officers. The awards are subject to redemption in 2012 and, therefore are being accounted for as a variable plan. The awards were ini- tially recorded in unearned compensation and changes in fair value subsequent to the grant date are included in the determination of net income. The unearned compensation is being amortized over the vesting periods. All transactions with non-employees in which the Company issues stock as consideration for services received are accounted for based on the fair value of the stock issued or services received, whichever is more reliably determinable. The Company’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan provides that each participating officer’s cash compensation in excess of designated amounts is deferred and he or she is awarded an interest that is intended to correspond to the per share value of a CPA® REIT designated at the time of such award. The value of the award is adjusted at least annually to reflect changes based on the underlying appraised value of a share of com- mon stock of the CPA® REIT. The deferred compensation plan is a variable plan and changes in the fair value of the interests are included in the determination of net income. Foreign Currency Translation The Company owns interests in several real estate investments in France. The functional currency for these investments is the Euro. The translation from the Euro to U. S. Dollars is performed for assets and liabilities using current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using a weighted average exchange rate during the period. The gains and losses resulting from such translation are reported as a component of other comprehensive income as part of members’ equity. The cumulative transla- tion adjustment as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 was a loss of $835 and a gain of $515, respectively. Foreign currency transactions may produce receivables or payables that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid. A change in the exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated increases or decreases the expected amount of func- tional currency cash flows upon settlement of that transaction. That increase or decrease in the expected functional currency cash flows is a foreign currency transaction gain or loss that generally will be included in determining net income for the period in which the exchange rate changes. Likewise, a transaction gain or loss (measured from the transaction date or the most recent intervening balance sheet date) whichever is later, real- ized upon settlement of a foreign currency transaction generally will be included in net income for the period in which the transaction is settled. Foreign currency transactions that are (i) designated as, and are effective as, economic hedges of a net investment and (ii) inter-company foreign currency transactions that are of a long- term nature (that is, settlement is not planned or anticipated in the foreseeable future), when the entities to the transactions are consolidated or accounted for by the equity method in the Company’s financial statements will not be included in determining net income but will be accounted for in the same manner as foreign cur- rency translation adjustments and reported as a component of other comprehensive income as part of shareholder’s equity. The contributions to the equity investments were funded in part through subordinated debt. Foreign currency intercompany transactions that are scheduled for settlement, consisting primarily of accrued interest and the translation to the reporting currency of intercompany subordinated debt with scheduled principal payments, are included in the determination of net income, and, for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company recognized an unrealized loss of $830 and unrealized gain of $790, respectively, from such transactions. In 2005 and 2004, the Company recognized a realized loss of $19 and realized gain of $430, respectively, on foreign currency transactions in connection with the transfer of cash from foreign operating subsidiaries to the parent company. 47 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Income Taxes The Company has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. The Company’s real estate operations are conducted through partnership or limited liability companies electing to be treated as partnerships for Federal income tax purposes. As partnerships, the Company and its partnership subsidiaries are generally not directly subject to tax and the taxable income or loss of these operations are included in the income tax returns of the members; accordingly, no provision for income tax expense or benefit is reflected in the accompanying financial statements. These operations are subject to certain state, local and foreign taxes. The Company conducts its management services operations though a wholly owned taxable corporation. These operations are subject to federal, state, local and foreign taxes as applicable. The Company’s financial statements are prepared on a consolidated basis including this taxable subsidiary and include a provision for current and deferred taxes on these operations. Deferred income taxes are provided for the corporate subsidiaries based on earnings reported. The provision for income taxes differs from the amounts currently payable because of temporary differences in the recognition of certain income and expense items for financial reporting and tax reporting purposes. Income taxes are com- puted under the asset and liability method. The asset and liability method requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between tax bases and financial bases of assets and liabilities (see Note 16). Assets Held for Sale Assets held for sale are accounted for at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to dispose. Assets are classified as held for sale when the Company has committed to a plan to actively market a property for sale and expects that a sale will be completed within one year. The results of operations and the related gain or loss on sale of properties classified as held for sale are included in discontinued operations (see Note 7). If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the property is reclassified as held and used. A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used or (b) the fair value at the date of the subsequent deci- sion not to sell. The Company recognizes gains and losses on the sale of properties when among other criteria, the parties are bound by the terms of the contract, all consideration has been exchanged and all conditions precedent to clos- ing have been performed. At the time the sale is consummated, a gain or loss is recognized as the difference between the sale price less any closing costs and the carrying value of the property. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) is an amendment of SFAS 123(R) and requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. The cost is required to be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. SFAS 123(R) also contains additional minimum disclosure requirements that include, but are not limited to, the valuation method and assumptions used, amounts of com- pensation capitalized and modifications made. The effective date of SFAS 123(R) was subsequently amended by the SEC to be as of the beginning of the first reporting period of fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2005, and allows several different methods of transition. The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective application method. Based on total non-vested awards as of December 31, 2005, the Company expects to record compensation expense of approximately $1,200 during 2006. 48 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47 “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” (“FIN 47”). FIN 47 requires an entity to recognize a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 clarifies that the term “Conditional Asset Retirement Obligation” refers to a legal obligation (pursuant to existing laws or by con- tract) to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 was effective no later than fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The Company adopted FIN 47 as required effective December 31, 2005 and the initial application of this Interpretation did not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations. In June 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF 04-05, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights” (“EITF 04-05”). The scope of EITF 04-05 is limited to limited partnerships or similar entities that are not variable interest entities under FIN 46(R). The Task Force reached a consensus that the general partners in a limited partnership (or similar entity) are presumed to control the entity regard- less of the level of their ownership and, accordingly, may be required to consolidate the entity. This presumption may be overcome if the agreements provide the limited partners with either (a) the substantive ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partners without cause or (b) substantive participating rights. If it is deemed that the limited partners’ rights overcome the presumption of control by a general partner of the limited partnership, the general partner shall account for its investment in the limited partnership using the equity method of accounting. EITF 04-05 was effective immediately for all arrangements created or modified after June 29, 2005. For all other arrangements, application of EITF 04-05 is required effective for the first reporting period in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005 (i.e., effective January 1, 2006 for the Company) using either a cumulative-effect-type adjustment or using a retrospective application. The Company does not believe that the adoption of EITF 04-05 will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. In October 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 13-1 “Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred during a Construction Period” (“FSP FAS 13-1”). FSP FAS 13-1 addresses the accounting for rental costs associated with operating leases that are incurred during the construction period. FSP FAS 13-1 makes no distinction between the right to use a leased asset during the construction period and the right to use that asset after the construction period. Therefore, rental costs associated with ground or building operating leases that are incurred during a construction period shall be recognized as rental expense, allocated over the lease term in accordance with SFAS No. 13 and Technical Bulletin 85-3. FSP FAS 13-1 is effective for the first reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company adopted FSP FAS 13-1 as required on January 1, 2006 and the initial application of this Staff Position did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. 3 Transactions with Related Parties The Company earns revenue as the advisor (“advisor”) to CPA®:12, CPA®:14, CPA®:15, CPA®:16 — Global and through September 1, 2004, CIP®. Under the advisory agreements with the CPA® REITs, the Company performs various services, including but not limited to the day-to-day management of the CPA® REITs and transaction-related services. The Company earns asset management revenue totaling 1% per annum of average 49 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t invested assets, as calculated pursuant to the advisory agreements for each CPA® REIT, of which 1/2 of 1% (“performance revenue”) is contingent upon specific performance criteria for each REIT, and is reimbursed for certain costs, primarily the cost of personnel. Effective in 2005, the advisory agreement was amended to allow the Company to elect to receive restricted stock for any revenue due from each CPA® REIT. As of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, asset-based revenue and reimbursements earned were $62,294, $61,194 and $56,402, respectively. As of December 31, 2005, CPA®:16 — Global did not meet the performance criterion (a non- compounded cumulative distribution return of 6%), as defined in the advisory agreements, and since its inception, the Company has deferred cumulative performance revenue of $4,518 that will be recognized if the performance criterion is met. In connection with structuring and negotiating investments and related mortgage financing for the CPA® REITs, the advisory agreements provide for structuring revenue based on the cost of investments. Under each of the advisory agreements, we may charge acquisition revenue of up to an average of 4.5% of the total cost of all investments made by each CPA® REIT. A portion of this revenue (generally 2.5%) is paid when the transaction is completed while the remainder (generally 2%) is payable in equal annual installments ranging from three to eight years, subject to the relevant CPA® REIT meeting its performance criterion. Unpaid installments bear interest at annual rates ranging from 5% to 7%. The Company may in certain circumstances be entitled to loan refinancing revenue of up to 1% of the principal amount refinanced in connection with structuring and negoti- ating investments. This loan refinancing revenue, together with the acquisition revenue, is referred to as structuring revenue. In addition, the Company may also earn revenue related to the disposition of properties, subject to subordi- nation provisions and will only recognized such revenue as the subordination provisions are achieved. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company earned structuring revenue of $28,197, $33,675 and $31,658, respectively. CPA®:16—Global has not met its performance criterion and since its inception, cumulative deferred acquisition revenue of $17,708 and interest thereon of $859, were deferred, and will be rec- ognized if CPA®:16—Global meets the performance criterion. Included in due from affiliate and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, is $23,085 and $0, respectively, of deferred revenue related to providing services to CPA®:16—Global (as described above). Collection of these amounts is subject to CPA®:16—Global meet- ing its performance criterion. In July 2004, the boards of directors of CIP® and CPA®:15 each approved a definitive agreement under which CPA®:15 would acquire CIP®’s business in a stock-for-stock merger (the “Merger”). The Merger was approved by the shareholders of CIP® and CPA®:15 in August 2004, and completed on September 1, 2004. In connection with providing a liquidity event for CIP® shareholders, CIP® paid the Company incentive revenue of $23,681 and disposition revenue of $22,679. Disposition revenues relating to the interests in the properties acquired by the Company of $4,265 were not earned and have been applied, for financial reporting purposes, as a reduction in the cost basis of such interests. The Company also recognized structuring revenue of $11,493 in connection with CPA®:15’s acquisition of properties in connection with the Merger. Prior to the Merger, the Company acquired interests in 17 properties from CIP® with a fair value of $142,161 for $115,158 in cash and the assumption of $27,003 in limited recourse mortgage notes payable (the “CIP® Acquisition”). The amounts are inclusive of the Company’s pro rata share of equity interests acquired in the transaction. The fair value of the assumed mortgages was $27,756. The purchase price of the properties was based on a third party valuation of each of CIP®’s properties. The properties are primarily single tenant net- leased properties, with remaining lease terms ranging from 19 months to over ten years. Seven of the properties are encumbered with limited recourse mortgage financing with fixed rates of interest ranging from 7.5% to 10% and maturity dates ranging from December 2007 to June 2012. 50 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC The Company owns interests in entities, which range from 22.50% to 50%, a jointly-controlled 36% tenancy- in-common interest in two properties subject to a net lease with the remaining interests held by affiliates and owns common stock in each of the CPA® REITs. The Company has a significant influence in these invest- ments, which are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The Company is the general partner in a limited partnership that leases the Company’s home office spaces and participates in an agreement with certain affiliates, including the CPA® REITs for the purpose of leasing office space used for the administration of the Company and other affiliated real estate entities and sharing the associated costs. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company’s share of rental, occupancy and lease- hold improvement costs is based on gross revenues. Expenses incurred were $826, $531 and $529 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Company’s share of minimum lease payments on the office lease as of December 31, 2005 is $6,685 through 2016. Prior to the termination of the management agreement, Carey Management performed certain services for the Company and earned structuring revenue in connection with the purchase and disposition of properties. The Company is obligated to pay deferred acquisition revenue in equal annual installments over a period of no less than eight years. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, unpaid deferred acquisition revenue was $1,185 and $1,709, respectively, and bore interest at an annual rate of 6%. Installments of $524 were paid in 2005, 2004 and 2003. A person who serves as a director and an officer of the Company is the sole shareholder of Livho, Inc. (“Livho”), a lessee of the Company. Effective December 31, 2003, the Company consolidated the accounts of Livho in its consolidated financial statements in accordance with FIN 46(R) as it was a VIE where the Company was the primary beneficiary. A director of the Company has an ownership interest in companies that own the minority interest in the Company’s French majority-owned subsidiaries. The director’s ownership interest is subject to the same terms as all other ownership interests in the subsidiary companies. Prior to April 1, 2003, the Company owned a 10% interest in W.P. Carey International LLC (“WPCI”), a company that structures net lease transactions on behalf of the CPA® REITs outside of the United States of America. The remaining 90% interest in WPCI was owned by Carey. The Company’s Board of Directors approved a transaction, which resulted in the Company’s acquisition of 100% of the ownership of WPCI through the redemption of Carey’s interest on April 1, 2003. WPCI distributed 492,881 shares of the Company and $1,898 of cash to Carey, equivalent to his contributions to WPCI. The Company accounted for the acquisi- tion as a purchase and reflected the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair value. Prior to the redemption, the Company accounted for its investment in WPCI under the equity method of accounting. 51 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t 4 Real Estate Real estate, which consists of land and buildings leased to others, at cost, and accounted for under the operat- ing method is summarized as follows: Cost Less: Accumulated depreciation Years ended December 31, 2005 2004 $515,275 (60,797) $454,478 $530,279 (53,914) $476,365 Operating real estate, which consists of the Company’s hotel operations, at cost, is summarized as follows: Cost Less: Accumulated depreciation Years ended December 31, 2005 $15,108 (7,243) $07,865 2004 $16,123 (6,983) $09,140 The scheduled future minimum rents, exclusive of renewals and expenses paid by tenants and future CPI- based increases, under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows: Years ended December 31, 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Thereafter through 2020 $46,719 41,454 37,384 34,433 24,461 81,155 Percentage rent increases were $369, $17 and $67 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. 5 Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases Net investment in direct financing leases is summarized as follows: Minimum lease payments receivable Unguaranteed residual value Less: Unearned income 52 December 31, 2005 2004 $083,047 $(158,864 123,812 206,859 (74,884) $131,975 162,724 321,588 (130,944) $(190,644 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC Scheduled future minimum rents, exclusive of renewals and expenses paid by tenants and future CPI-based increases, under non-cancelable direct financing leases are as follows: Years ended December 31, 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Thereafter through 2022 $ 13,910 12,114 10,166 9,403 7,378 30,076 Percentage rent increases were approximately $110 in 2005. There were no percentage rent increases in 2004 and 2003. 6 Equity Investments The Company owns equity interests as a limited partner in two limited partnerships, four limited liability com- panies and a jointly-controlled 36% tenancy-in-common interest in two properties subject to a master lease with the remaining interests owned by affiliates and all of which net lease real estate on a single-tenant basis. In connection with the CIP® Acquisition, the Company increased its 18.54% interest in a limited partner- ship, which leases property to Titan Corporation, to 100%. The Company accounted for its 18.54% interest as an equity investment, and as a result of acquiring the controlling ownership interest as of September 1, 2004, the Company consolidates this interest as of such date. The Company also acquired CIP®’s 50% non-controlling interest in a limited partnership, which leases property to Sicor, Inc., and is accounting for this interest under the equity method of accounting. The Company also owns common stock in four CPA® REITs with which it has advisory agreements. The interests in the CPA® REITs are accounted for under the equity method due to the Company’s ability to exer- cise significant influence as the advisor to the CPA® REITs. The CPA® REITs are publicly registered and their audited consolidated financial statements are filed with the SEC in Annual Reports on Form 10-K. In connec- tion with earning performance revenue, the Company has elected to receive restricted shares of common stock in the CPA® REITs rather than cash in consideration for such revenue. In connection with the Merger, the Company elected to receive 1,098,367 shares of common stock in CPA®:15, in exchange for its CIP® shares, a portion of which are still restricted. As of December 31, 2005, the Company’s ownership in the CPA® REITs is as follows: CPA®:12 CPA®:14 CPA®:15 CPA®:16 — Global Shares 2,424,430 3,214,930 3,248,468 351,453 % of outstanding Shares 7.43% 4.57% 2.55% .61% 53 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Combined financial information of the affiliated equity investees is summarized as follows: Assets (primarily real estate) Liabilities (primarily mortgage notes payable) Owner’s equity Company’s share of equity investees’ net assets December 31, 2005 2004 $(5,593,102 $(5,189,736 (2,992,146) (2,372,468) $(2,600,956 $(0,134,567 $(2,817,268 $(0,110,379 Years Ended December 31, 2005 2004 2003 Revenue (primarily rental income and interest income from direct financing leases) $ 463,620 $ 342,419 $ 246,936 Expenses (primarily depreciation and property expenses) (194,057) (140,969) (110,106) Other interest income Minority interest in income Income from equity investments Interest expense (Loss) gain on sales Income from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations (Loss) gain on sale of real estate Net income Company’s share of net income from equity investments 7 Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations 13,575 (19,215) 48,857 7,928 (12,986) 38,438 6,176 (5,720) 30,650 (170,498) (125,948) (90,760) (32) 142,250 (5,399) (1,652) $ 135,199 $ 5,182 7,446 116,328 9,316 86,492 (5,376) (20,571) 18 $ 110,970 $ 5,308 — $ 65,921 $ 4,008 Property sales and impairment charges in 2005, 2004 and 2003 that are included in discontinued operations are as follows: Assets Held for Sale In December 2005, the Company entered into a contract to sell its property in Bay Minette, Alabama to a third party for $550 and recognized an impairment charge of $75 to reduce the property’s carrying value to its estimated net sales proceeds. In February 2006, the third party exercised its option to terminate this contract. The Company is continuing to market this property for sale. In December 2005, the Company received notification from the lessee of a property in Olive Branch, Mississippi of its election to exercise its existing option to purchase the property in accordance with the terms of the lease agreement. In connection with this transaction, during the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $650 as the estimated sales proceeds as estimated by the Company were lower than the property’s carrying value. 54 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC In March 2005, the Company entered into a contract to sell its property in Travelers Rest, South Carolina to a third party for $2,550. The Company currently expects to complete this transaction in the first half of 2006 and expects to record a gain on this sale of approximately $1,000. Impairment charges totaling $2,507 were previously recorded in prior years to write down the property value to the estimated net sales proceeds. Assets held for sale also include a property located in Cincinnati, Ohio that is subject to a contract for sale for approximately $10,100. Impairment charges totaling $2,700 were previously recorded in prior years to write down the property’s value to its estimated fair value. Discontinued Operations As a result of a lessee exercising its existing option to purchase the Company’s Berea, Kentucky property, in December 2005, the Company sold this property for $8,961, net of closing costs and recognized a gain of $20. During 2005 and 2004, the Company recognized impairment charges of $5,241 and $1,099, respectively, on this property (see Note 12). In May 2005, the Company sold its properties in Dubuque, Iowa, Portsmouth, New Hampshire and Penfield, New York to a third party for $28,850, net of closing costs and recognized a gain on the sale of $9,152. During 2005, the Company sold several other domestic properties to third parties for combined sales pro- ceeds of $7,593, net of closing costs and recognized a combined net gain of $1,302. Impairment charges totaling $2,031 were previously recorded on these properties to reduce their property values to the estimated net sales proceeds. During 2004, the Company sold several domestic properties to third parties for combined sales proceeds of $6,650 and recognized a net gain of $89. The Company previously recognized impairment charges on certain of these properties of $5,250 and $690 in 2004 and 2003, respectively (see Note 12). During 2003, the Company sold its properties in Broomall, Pennsylvania; Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio; Canton, Michigan; Alpena, Michigan; Apache Junction, Arizona and Schiller Park, Illinois for net sales proceeds of $12,986 and recognized a combined net gain on sales of $807. In July 2003, the Company sold a property in Lancaster, Pennsylvania for $5,000 and recognized a loss on sale of $29. The Company previously recognized an impairment charge of $1,430 on this property. In February 2003, the Company sold its property in Winona, Minnesota for $8,550, consisting of cash of $6,300 and notes receivable with a fair value of $2,250, and recognized a gain on this sale of $46. The Company also received a note receivable of approximately $1,700 for unpaid rents. During 2004, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $1,250 related to the notes receivable (see Note 12). Other Information Included in the Company’s operating assets and liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 are assets of $953 and liabilities of $290 related to the Company’s properties held for sale. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” the results of operations, impairments and gain or loss on sales of real estate for properties held for sale are reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations for all periods presented and are summarized as follows: 55 Years Ended December 31, 2005 2004 2003 $ 1,548 $ 2,903 $ 4,874 2,009 36 — 3,593 (13) (331) (1,046) (6,616) — — 3,784 2,948 — 9,635 — (579) (1,881) (9,199) (35) — (8,006) (11,694) 10,474 (318) 10,156 $ 5,743 89 (328) (239) $ (2,298) $ 4,669 4,202 1,504 1,694 12,274 (1,135) (2,752) (2,960) (1,489) (35) (8,371) 1,238 (472) 766 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Revenues Rental income Interest income from direct financing leases Other operating income Revenues of other business operations Operating Expenses General and administrative Depreciation and amortization Property expenses Impairment charges and loan losses Operating expenses of other business operations Provision for income taxes — state and local Other Income and Expenses Gains on sale of real estate, net Interest expense Income (loss) from discontinued operations 56 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC 8 Goodwill and Intangibles In connection with its acquisition of properties, the Company has recorded net lease intangibles of $20,312. These intangibles are being amortized over periods ranging from 19 months to 27 1/2 years. Amortization of below-market and above-market rent intangibles are recorded as an adjustment to revenue. Goodwill and intangibles are summarized as follows: Amortized intangibles: Management contracts Less: accumulated amortization Lease intangibles In-place lease Tenant relationship Above-market rent Less: accumulated amortization Unamortized goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles: Trade name Goodwill Below-market rent Less: accumulated amortization December 31, 2005 2004 $046,348 $046,348 (25,206) 21,142 13,630 4,863 3,828 (6,738) 15,583 3,975 63,607 $104,307 $ (2,009) 197 (20,622) 25,726 13,630 4,863 3,828 (1,521) 20,800 3,975 63,607 $114,108 $ (2,009) 45 $ (1,812) $ (1,964) Amortization of intangibles was $9,649, $10,304 and $7,277 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The remaining unamortized management contract for CIP® was accelerated to expense as a result of its merger with CPA®:15. Intangible assets totaling $13,467 became fully amortized during 2004 and as a result were written off. Scheduled net amortization of intangibles for each of the next five years is as follows: $9,406 in 2006, $7,295 in 2007, $4,211 in 2008, $4,184 in 2009 and $3,542 in 2010. 9 Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company estimates that the fair value of mortgage notes payable and other notes payable was $245,187 and $294,121 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The fair value of fixed rate debt instruments was evaluated using a discounted cash flow model with rates that take into account the credit of the tenants and interest rate risk. The carrying value of the combined debt was $246,113 and $292,698 at December 31, 2005 57 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t and 2004, respectively. The fair value of the note payable from the line of credit approximates the carrying value as it is a variable rate obligation with an interest rate indexed to market rates. Marketable securities had a carrying value of $3,716 and $3,655 as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respec- tively, and a fair value of $7,723 and $6,940 as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company’s other assets and liabilities, including minority interests, had fair values that approximated their carrying values at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. 10 Mortgage Notes Payable and Notes Payable Mortgage notes payable, substantially all of which are limited recourse obligations, are collateralized by the assignment of various leases and by real property with a carrying value of $361,497 at December 31, 2005. The interest rates on the variable rate debt as of December 31, 2005 ranged from 4.49% to 6.44% and mature from 2008 to 2016. The interest rates on the fixed rate debt as of December 31, 2005 ranged from 4.87% to 10.125% and mature from 2006 to 2015. Scheduled principal payments for the mortgage notes and notes payable during each of the next five years following December 31, 2005 and thereafter are as follows: Years Ending December 31, Total Debt Fixed Rate Debt Variable Rate Debt 2006 2007 (a) 2008 2009 2010 Thereafter through 2016 Total (a) Includes maturity of credit facility in May 2007. $015,394 $012,999 42,392 17,550 39,728 16,639 114,410 $246,113 24,744 9,625 36,627 13,448 83,673 $181,116 $02,395 17,648 7,925 3,101 3,191 30,737 $64,997 The Company has a credit facility for a $175,000 line of credit with JP Morgan Chase Bank and eight other banks. The line of credit, which matures in May 2007, provides the Company the right, on up to two occasions through May 27, 2006, to increase the amount available under the line of credit by not less than $20,000 and not more than $50,000 up to a maximum of $225,000. Advances from the line of credit bear interest at an annual rate indexed to either (i) the one, two, three or six-month London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, as defined, plus a spread which ranges from 0.6% to 1.45% depending on leverage or corporate credit rating or (ii) the greater of the bank’s Prime Rate and the Federal Funds Effective Rate. Advances are prepayable at any time. The revolving credit agreement has financial covenants that require, among other things, the Company to (i) maintain minimum equity value of not less than $550,000 plus 85% of fair market value, as defined, of amounts received by the Company as proceeds from the issuance of equity interests and (ii) meet or exceed certain operating and coverage ratios. The Company is in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2005. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had $15,000 drawn from the credit facility. At December 31, 2005, the average interest rate on advances on the line of credit was 4.975%. At December 31, 2004, the average interest rate on advances on the line of credit was 3.5375%. In addition, the 58 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC Company pays a fee (a) ranging between 0.15% and 0.20% per annum of the unused portion of the credit facil- ity, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio, if no minimum credit rating for the Company is in effect or (b) ranging between 0.15% and 0.25% of the total commitment amount, depending on the Company’s credit rating. 11 Commitments and Contingencies As of December 31, 2005, the Company was not involved in any material litigation. In March 2004, following a broker-dealer examination of Carey Financial, LLC (“Carey Financial”), the Company’s wholly-owned broker-dealer subsidiary, by the staff of the SEC, Carey Financial received a letter from the staff of the SEC alleging certain infractions by Carey Financial of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the rules and regulations thereunder and those of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”). The staff alleged that in connection with a public offering of shares of CPA®:15, Carey Financial and its retail distributors sold certain securities without an effective registration statement. Specifically, the staff alleged that the delivery of investor funds into escrow after completion of the first phase of the offering (the “Phase I Offering”), completed in the fourth quarter of 2002 but before a registration statement with respect to the sec- ond phase of the offering (the “Phase II Offering”) became effective in the first quarter of 2003, constituted sales of securities in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. In addition, in the March 2004 letter the staff raised issues about whether actions taken in connection with the Phase II offering were adequately dis- closed to investors in the Phase I Offering. In the event the Commission pursues these allegations, or if affected CPA®:15 investors bring a similar private action, CPA®:15 might be required to offer the affected investors the opportunity to receive a return of their investment. It cannot be determined at this time if, as a consequence of investor funds being returned by CPA®:15, Carey Financial would be required to return to CPA®:15 the com- missions paid by CPA®:15 on purchases actually rescinded. Further, as part of any action against the Company, the SEC could seek disgorgement of any such commissions or different or additional penalties or relief, includ- ing without limitation, injunctive relief and/or civil monetary penalties, irrespective of the outcome of any rescission offer. The Company cannot predict the potential effect such a rescission offer or SEC action may ultimately have on the operations of Carey Financial or the Company. There can be no assurance that the effect, if any, would not be material. The staff also alleged in the March 2004 letter that the prospectus delivered with respect to the Phase I Offering contained material misrepresentations and omissions in violation of Section 17 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder in that the prospectus failed to disclose that (i) the proceeds of the Phase I Offering would be used to advance commissions and expenses payable with respect to the Phase II Offering, and (ii) the payment of dividends to Phase II share- holders whose funds had been held in escrow pending effectiveness of the registration statement resulted in significantly higher annualized rates of return than were being earned by Phase I shareholders. Carey Financial has reimbursed CPA®:15 for the interest cost of advancing the commissions that were later recovered by CPA®:15 from the Phase II Offering proceeds. In June 2004, the Division of Enforcement of the SEC (“Enforcement Staff”) commenced an investigation into compliance with the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with the public offerings of shares of CPA®:15 during 2002 and 2003. In December 2004, the scope of the Enforcement Staff’s inquiries broadened to include broker-dealer compensation arrangements in connection with CPA®:15 and other REITs managed by the Company, as well as the disclosure of such arrangements. At that time the 59 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Company and Carey Financial received a subpoena from the Enforcement Staff seeking documents relating to payments by the Company, Carey Financial, and REITs managed by the Company to (or requests for payment received from) any broker-dealer, excluding selling commissions and selected dealer fees. The Company and Carey Financial subsequently received additional subpoenas and requests for information from the Enforcement Staff seeking, among other things, information relating to any revenue sharing agreements or payments (defined to include any payment to a broker-dealer, excluding selling commissions and selected dealer fees) made by the Company, Carey Financial or any Company-managed REIT in connection with the distribution of Company-managed REITs or the retention or maintenance of REIT assets. Other information sought by the SEC includes information concerning the accounting treatment and disclosure of any such payments, commu- nications with third parties (including other REIT issuers) concerning revenue sharing, and documents concerning the calculation of underwriting compensation in connection with the REIT offerings under applica- ble NASD rules. In response to the Enforcement Staff’s subpoenas and requests, the Company and Carey Financial have pro- duced documents relating to payments made to certain broker-dealers both during and after the offering process, for certain of the REITs managed by the Company (including CPA®:10, CIP®, CPA®:12, CPA®:14 and CPA®:15), in addition to selling commissions and selected dealer fees. Among the payments reflected on documents produced to the Staff were certain payments, aggregating in excess of $9,600, made to a broker-dealer which distributed shares of the REITs. The expenses associated with these payments, which were made during the period from early 2000 through the end of 2003, were borne by and accounted for on the books and records of the REITs. Of these payments, CPA®:10 paid in excess of $40; CIP® paid in excess of $875; CPA®:12 paid in excess of $2,455; CPA®:14 paid in excess of $4,990; and CPA®:15 paid in excess of $1,240. In addition, other smaller payments by the REITs to the same and other broker-dealers have been identified aggregating less than $1,000. The Company and Carey Financial are cooperating fully with this investigation and have provided informa- tion to the Enforcement Staff in response to the subpoenas and requests. Although no formal regulatory action has been initiated against the Company or Carey Financial in connection with the matters being investigated, the Company expects that the SEC may pursue such an action against either or both of them. The nature of the relief or remedies the SEC may seek cannot be predicted at this time. If such an action is brought, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company and the magnitude of that effect would not necessarily be lim- ited to the payments described above but could include other payments and civil monetary penalties. Several state securities regulators have sought information from Carey Financial relating to the matters described above. While one or more states may commence proceedings against Carey Financial in connection with these inquiries, the Company does not currently expect that these inquires will have a material effect on it incremental to that caused by any SEC action. The Company has provided indemnification in connection with divestitures. These indemnities address a variety of matters including environmental liabilities. The Company’s maximum obligations under such indem- nification cannot be reasonably estimated. The Company is not aware of any claims or other information that would give rise to material payments under such indemnifications. 60 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC 12 Impairment Charges and Loan Losses The Company recorded impairment charges of $21,770, $22,098 and $4,440 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, of which $6,616, $9,199 and $2,960 are included in discontinued operations for each respective year. Impairment Charges on Direct Finance Leases In connection with the Company’s annual review of the estimated residual values on its properties classified as net investments in direct financing leases, the Company determined that an other than temporary decline in estimated residual value had occurred at several properties due to market conditions, and the accounting for the direct financing leases was revised using the changed estimates. The resulting changes in estimates resulted in the recognition of impairment charges totaling $2,774, $5,248 and $1,208 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Impairment Charges on Operating Assets In March 2005, the Company received notification from Gibson Greetings, Inc., the lessee of its Amberly Village, Ohio and Berea, Kentucky properties, that the lessee was exercising its existing option to purchase both properties, at fair value, to be completed pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement. In connection with this transaction, the Company recognized impairment charges of $9,450 on the Ohio property and $5,241 on the Kentucky property as the estimated fair value of the properties was lower than their carrying value. The Company also recognized an impairment charge of $1,099 in 2004 related to the Kentucky property. In December 2005, the Company negotiated a lease termination agreement with the lessee on the Ohio property for a termination fee of $3,000 and reclassified the property as an asset held for use. Also in December 2005, the Company completed the sale of the Kentucky property (the sale of this property is discussed in Note 7). The impairment charges of $5,241 and $1,099 in 2005 and 2004, respectively, related to the Kentucky property are accounted for in discontinued operations and are included in impairment charges on assets held for sale below. In connection with entering into a commitment to sell a property in Livonia, Michigan for $8,500 during the first quarter of 2005, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $800 as the property’s estimated fair value was lower than its carrying value. The $8,500 proposed transaction was terminated and in June 2005 the Company entered into a letter of intent to sell this property for $8,000. The Company recognized an additional impairment charge of $330 in the second quarter of 2005 as the proposed net sale proceeds of this transaction were below the property’s carrying value. During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company reclassified this prop- erty to an asset held for use as the $8,000 transaction has focused on partnering with the proposed buyer to upgrade the facility rather than sell it. The Company had previously recorded an impairment charge of $7,500 during 2004 as the result of an impairment valuation, which revealed that the property had undergone an other than temporary decline in value. During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company recognized impairment charges on other properties totaling $1,800, $1,250 and $272, respectively. The impairment charge in 2005 was prima- rily due a decline in property values whereas the impairment charges in 2004 and 2003 were primarily due to a loan loss and the Company’s assessment of the recoverability of debentures received in connection with a bank- ruptcy settlement with a former lessee, respectively. 61 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Impairment Charges on Assets Held for Sale During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company recognized impairment charges on properties classified as held for sale or sold totaling $6,616, $9,199 and $2,960, respectively. These impairment charges, which are included in discontinued operations, were primarily the result of reducing these properties carrying values to their estimated fair values. These properties are discussed further in Note 7. 13 Sales of Real Estate The results of operations and the related gain or loss on properties that were held for sale or sold in 2005, 2004 or 2003, are included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income (see Note 7). 2003 In December 2003, the Company sold a property in Oxnard, California for $7,500, and recognized a gain of $414. The Company placed proceeds of the sale in an escrow account with the intention of entering into a Section 1031 non-cash exchange which, under the Internal Revenue Code, would allow the Company to acquire like-kind property, and defer a taxable gain until the new property is sold, upon satisfaction of certain conditions. During 2004, $7,185 was released from the escrow account, when an exchange was not completed. 14 Members’ Equity and Stock Based Compensation Dividends Payable The Company declared a quarterly dividend of $.45 per share on December 15, 2005 payable on January 15, 2006 to shareholders of record as of December 31, 2005. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, accumulated other comprehensive income reflected in the members’ equity, net of tax is comprised of the following: Unrealized gains on marketable securities Foreign currency translation adjustment Accumulated other comprehensive income Stock Based Compensation December 31, 2005 $ 4,007 (835) $ 3,172 2004 $ 3,285 515 $ 3,800 In January 1998, the predecessor of Carey Management (see Note 1) was granted warrants to purchase 2,284,800 shares exercisable at $21 per share and 725,930 shares exercisable at $23 per share as compensation for investment banking services in connection with structuring the consolidation of the CPA® Partnerships. The warrants are exercisable until January 2009. The Company maintains stock option incentive plans pursuant to which share options may be issued. The 1997 Share Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), as amended, authorizes the issuance of up to 6,200,000 62 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC shares. The Company’s Non-Employee Directors’ Plan (the “Directors’ Plan”) authorizes the issuance of up to 300,000 shares. Both plans were approved by a vote of the shareholders. The Incentive Plan provides for the grant of (i) share options which may or may not qualify as incentive stock options, (ii) performance shares, (iii) dividend equivalent rights and (iv) restricted shares. Share options have been granted as follows: 365,277 in 2005 at exercise prices ranging from $24 to $35.35, 513,171 in 2004 at exercise prices ranging from $22.59 to $35.16, and 122,000 in 2003 at exercise prices ranging from $25.01 to $31.79 per share. The options granted under the Incentive Plan have a 10-year term and vest over periods ranging from three to ten years from the date of grant. The vesting of grants is accelerated upon a change in control of the Company and under certain other conditions. The Directors’ Plan provides for similar terms as the Incentive Plan. Options granted under the Directors’ Plan have a 10-year term and vest over three years from the date of grant. No share options were granted in 2005. During 2004, 12,000 share options were granted at exercise prices ranging from $24.50 to $30.25 per share. No share options were granted in 2003. Share option and warrant activity is as follows: Years Ended December 31, 2005 2004 2003 Weighted Average Weighted Average Weighted Average Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price 5,165,617 $22.05 4,812,902 $20.95 4,979,862 $20.26 365,277 (86,558) (174,572) 31.79 18.26 25.24 525,171 (146,121) (26,335) 29.68 21.09 24.18 122,000 (251,113) (37,847) 26.24 14.29 19.14 21.20 Outstanding at beginning of year Granted Exercised Forfeited Outstanding at end of year 5,269,764 22.68 5,165,617 22.05 4,812,902 Options exercisable at end of year 4,394,887 $21.15 4,287,999 $20.97 4,108,073 $20.95 Stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2005 are as follows: Range of Exercise Prices $ 7.69 $ 16.25 to $35.35 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable Options Weighted Average Weighted Options Outstanding at Remaining Average Exercisable at Weighted Average December 31, 2005 Contractual Life Exercise Price December 31, 2005 Exercise Price 19,988 5,249,776 5,269,764 4.50 4.62 4.62 $07.69 $22.73 $22.68 19,988 4,374,899 4,394,887 $07.69 $21.22 $21.15 At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the range of exercise prices and weighted-average remaining contractual life of outstanding share options and warrants was $7.69 to $35.16 and 5.41 years, and $7.69 to $31.79 and 6.03 years, respectively. On June 30, 2003, WPCI granted an incentive award to certain officers of WPCI consisting of 1,500,000 restricted shares, representing an approximate 13% interest in WPCI, and 1,500,000 options for WPCI com- mon stock with a combined fair value of $2,485 at that date. Both the options and restricted stock were issued in 2003 and are vesting ratably over five years. The options are exercisable at $1 per share for a period of ten 63 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t years from the initial vesting date. The vested restricted stock and stock received upon the exercise of options of WPCI by minority interest holders may be redeemed commencing in 2012 or thereafter solely in exchange for shares of the Company. Any redemption will be subject to a third party valuation of WPCI. The fair value of the awards has been recorded as minority interest and included in other liabilities in the accompanying con- solidated financial statements. The awards were also initially recorded in unearned compensation as a component of shareholders’ equity. The awards are being accounted for as a variable plan in accordance with APB No. 25 because the number of Company shares to be issued upon a redemption will not be known until a redemption occurs. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the minority interest subsequent to the grant date are included in the determination of net income based on the vesting period and valued quarterly. As a result of an increase in fair value, $769 was incurred as compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2005. The combined estimated fair value of the options and restricted stock as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 is $5,910 and $5,691, respectively. The unearned compensation is being amortized over the vesting periods and $451 and $1,094 and has been amortized into compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The per share fair value of the 1,500,000 share options granted by WPCI during 2003 was estimated to be $1.593 using a Black-Scholes option pricing formula. The more significant assumptions underlying the determi- nation of the average fair value included a risk-free interest rate of 4.42% and an expected life of 11 years. The Company has elected to adopt the disclosure only provisions of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148. If stock-based compensation cost had been recognized based upon fair value at the date of grant for options and restricted stock awarded under the Company’s share incentive plans and amortized to expense over their respec- tive vesting periods in accordance with the provisions of FAS No. 123, pro forma net income would have been as follows: Years Ended December 31, 2005 2004 2003 Net income as reported $ 48,604 $ 65,841 $ 62,878 Add: Stock based compensation included in net income, as reported, net of related tax effects 2,727 2,264 2,282 Less: Stock based compensation determined under fair value based methods for all awards, net of related tax effects (3,166) (2,853) (3,144) Pro forma net income $ 48,165 $ 65,252 $ 62,016 Earnings per common share as reported: Basic Diluted Pro forma earnings per common share: Basic Diluted $ 1.29 $ 1.25 $ 1.28 $ 1.23 $ 1.76 $ 1.69 $ 1.74 $ 1.67 $ 1.72 $ 1.64 $ 1.70 $ 1.61 The diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 have been restated to conform to the current year presentation. This change resulted in an increase in the diluted shares of 57,023 and had no impact on the Company’s diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2003 this resulted in an increase in the diluted shares of 425,407 and a decrease in the diluted earnings per share of $.01. 64 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC The per share weighted average fair value of share options and warrants granted during 2005 under the Company’s Incentive Plan were estimated to range from $1.64 to $2.12 using a Black-Scholes option pricing formula based on the date of grant. The more significant assumptions underlying the determination of the weighted average fair values included risk-free interest rates ranging from 3.94% to 4.56%, volatility factor of 20%, dividend yields ranging from 7.7% to 7.8% and an expected life of 10 years. The per share weighted average fair value of share options and warrants granted during 2004 under the Company’s Incentive Plan were estimated to range from $1.96 to $2.47 using a Black-Scholes option pricing formula based on the date of grant. The more significant assumptions underlying the determination of the weighted average fair values included risk-free interest rates ranging from 3.63% to 3.92%, volatility factors ranging from 20.66% to 21.56%, dividend yields ranging from 7.79% to 8.19% and expected lives ranging from 7 to 7.13 years. The per share weighted average fair value of share options and warrants granted during 2003 under the Company’s Incentive Plan were estimated to range from $1.51 to $2.28 using a Black-Scholes option pricing formula based on the date of grant. The more significant assumptions underlying the determination of the weighted average fair values included risk-free interest rates ranging from 2.60% to 3.69%, volatility factors ranging from 21.35% to 21.89%, dividend yields ranging from 8.26% to 8.51% and expected lives ranging from 4.56 to 7.5 years. Earnings Per Share The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”). Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstand- ing for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue shares were exercised or converted into common stock, where such exercise or conversion would result in a lower EPS amount. Basic and diluted earnings per share were calculated as follows: Years Ended December 31, 2005 2004 2003 Net income $ 48,604 $ 65,841 $ 62,878 Weighted average shares — basic 37,688,835 37,417,918 36,566,338 Effect of dilutive securities — stock options and warrants 1,331,966 1,543,830 1,867,831 Weighted average shares — diluted 39,020,801 38,961,748 38,434,169 65 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t 15 Employee Incentive and Benefit Plans Compensation During 2003, the Company adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan under which a portion of any participating officer’s cash compensation in excess of designated amounts will be deferred and the officer will be awarded a Partnership Equity Plan Unit (“PEP Unit”). The value of each PEP Unit is intended to correspond to the value of a share of the CPA® REIT designated at the time of such award. Redemption will occur at the earlier of a liquidity event of the underlying CPA® REIT or twelve years from the date of award. The award is fully vested upon grant, and the Company may terminate the plan at any time. The value of each PEP Unit will be adjusted to reflect the underlying appraised value of the CPA® REIT. Additionally, each PEP Unit will be entitled to a distribution equal to the distribution rate of the CPA® REIT. All issuances of PEP Units, changes in the fair value of PEP Units and distributions paid are included in compensation expense of the Company. Compensation expense under this plan for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $2,412, $2,826 and $2,028, respectively. The Company sponsors a qualified profit-sharing plan and trust covering substantially all of its full-time employees who have attained age twenty-one, worked a minimum of 1,000 hours and completed one year of service. The Company is under no obligation to contribute to the plan and the amount of any contribution is determined by and at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors can authorize contribu- tions to a maximum of 15% of an eligible participant’s compensation, limited to $31 annually per participant. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, amounts expensed by the Company for contributions to the trust were $2,108, $1,988 and $1,926, respectively. 66 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC 16 Income Taxes The components of the Company’s provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 are as follows: Federal: Current Deferred State, local and foreign: Current Deferred 2005 2004 2003 $ 11,761 $ 26,330 1,222 12,983 6,080 327 6,407 6,118 32,448 15,826 2,709 18,535 $ 5,694 5,749 11,443 3,944 3,729 7,673 Total provision $ 19,390 $ 50,983 $ 19,116 Deferred income taxes as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 consist of the following: 2005 2004 Deferred tax assets: Unearned and deferred compensation $ 4,479 $ 3,436 Other liabilities Deferred tax liabilities: Receivables from affiliates Investments Other Net deferred tax liability 649 5,128 24,658 20,378 — 45,036 $ 39,908 850 4,286 22,939 18,974 732 42,645 $ 38,359 The difference between the tax provision and the tax benefit recorded at the statutory rate at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 is as follows: Pre-tax income from taxable subsidiaries Federal provision at statutory tax rate (35%) State and local taxes, net of federal benefit Amortization of intangible assets Other Tax provision — taxable subsidiaries Other state, local and foreign taxes Total tax provision 2005 2004 2003 $ 38,680 13,538 3,566 1,245 313 18,662 728 $ 98,707 34,547 11,695 2,210 1,225 49,677 1,306 $ 41,820 14,219 3,950 1,625 (2,225) 17,569 1,547 $ 19,390 $ 50,983 $ 19,116 67 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t 17 Segment Reporting The Company evaluates its results from operations by major business segment as follows: MANAGEMENT SERVICES OPERATIONS. This business segment includes management operations services performed for the CPA® REITs pursuant to the advisory agreements. This business line also includes interest on deferred revenue and earnings from unconsolidated investments in the CPA® REITs accounted for under the equity method which were received in-lieu of cash for certain revenue. This business segment is car- ried out largely by corporate subsidiaries which are subject to federal, state, local and foreign taxes as applicable. The Company’s financial statements are prepared on a consolidated basis including these taxable operations and include a provision for current and deferred taxes on these operations. REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS. This business segment includes the operations of properties under operating lease, properties under direct financing leases, real estate under construction and development, assets held for sale and equity investments in ventures accounted for under the equity method which are engaged in these activities. Because of the Company’s and its subsidiaries legal structure, these operations are not generally sub- ject to federal income taxes however, they may be subject to certain state, local and foreign taxes. A summary of comparative results of these business segments is as follows: Management Services Revenues Operating expenses Interest expense Other, net (1) Provision for income taxes Years Ended December 31, 2005 2004 2003 $ 90,863 $ 147,154 $ 89,358 (55,022) (54,861) (46,995) — 7,262 (35) 3,490 — 2,980 (18,662) (49,546) (17,715) Income from continuing operations $ 24,441 $ 46,202 $ 27,628 Real Estate Revenues Operating expenses Interest expense Other, net (1) Provision for income taxes $ 83,254 $ 75,048 $ 64,687 (49,791) (16,787) 2,472 (728) (41,889) (14,453) 4,668 (1,437) (21,332) (14,660) 3,287 (1,401) Income from continuing operations $ 18,420 $ 21,937 $ 30,581 Total Company Revenues Operating expenses Interest expense Other, net (1) $(174,117 $ 222,202 $ 154,045 (104,813) (16,787) 9,734 (96,750) (14,488) 8,158 (68,327) (14,660) 6,267 Provision for income taxes (19,390) (50,983) (19,116) Income from continuing operations $ 42,861 $ 68,139 $ 58,209 68 W. P. Carey & Co. LLC EQUITY INVESTMENTS TOTAL ASSETS TOTAL LONG-LIVED ASSETS As of December 31, As of December 31, As of December 31, 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 Management Services $ 90,411 $ 61,481 $ 288,926 $ 237,889 $ 109,204 $ 83,018 Real Estate Total Company 44,156 48,898 694,336 775,650 656,406 750,035 $ 134,567 $ 110,379 $ 983,262 $ 1,013,539 $ 765,610 $ 833,053 (1) Includes interest income, minority interest, income from equity investments and gains and losses on sales and foreign currency transactions. For 2005, geographic information for the real estate operations segment is as follows: Revenues Operating expenses Interest expense Other, net (2) Provision for income taxes Domestic International (1) Total Real Estate $ 75,198 $ 8,056 $ 83,254 (46,496) (13,567) 1,846 (520) (3,295) (3,220) 626 (208) (49,791) (16,787) 2,472 (728) Income from continuing operations $ 16,461 $ 1,959 $ 18,420 Total assets Total long-lived assets 638,130 601,193 56,206 55,213 694,336 656,406 For 2004, geographic information for the real estate operations segment is as follows: Revenues Operating expenses Interest expense Other, net (2) Provision for income taxes Domestic International (1) Total Real Estate $ 67,367 $ 7,681 $ 75,048 (38,905) (10,886) 2,324 (806) (2,984) (3,567) 2,344 (631) (41,889) (14,453) 4,668 (1,437) Income from continuing operations $ 19,094 $ 2,843 $ 21,937 Total assets Total long-lived assets 705,844 685,332 69,806 64,703 775,650 750,035 For 2003, geographic information for the real estate operations segment is as follows: Revenues Operating expenses Interest expense Other, net (2) Provision for income taxes Domestic International (1) Total Real Estate $ 58,285 $ 6,402 $ 64,687 (18,739) (11,247) 2,618 (893) (2,593) (3,413) 669 (508) (21,332) (14,660) 3,287 (1,401) Income from continuing operations $ 30,024 $ 557 $ 30,581 Total assets Total long-lived assets 636,350 584,554 69,481 61,360 705,831 645,914 (1) The company’s international operations consist of investments in France. (2) Includes interest income, minority interest, income from equity investments and gains and losses on sales and foreign currency transactions. 69 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t 18 Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) Revenues (1) Expenses (1) Net income Earnings per share - Basic Diluted Dividends declared per share Revenues (1) Expenses(1) Net income Earnings per share - Basic Diluted Dividends declared per share Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 June 30, 2005 September 30, 2005 December 31, 2005 $ 45,853 (30,613) 5,855 $ 44,419 $ 41,962 $ 41,883 (24,803) 16,933 (20,734) 14,328 (28,663) 11,488 .16 .15 .444 .45 .43 .446 .38 .37 .448 .30 .30 .450 Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 June 30, 2004 September 30, 2004 December 31, 2004 $ 35,652 $ 51,822 $ 97,827 $ 36,901 (20,607) (21,867) (30,620) (23,656) 11,092 15,480 35,154 4,115 .30 .29 .436 .41 .40 .438 .94 .90 .440 .11 .10 .442 (1) Certain amounts from previous quarters have been reclassified to discontinued operations (see Note 7). 70 Report on Form 10-K W. P. Carey & Co. LLC The Company will supply to any shareholder, upon written request and without charge, a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the SEC. The 10-K may also be obtained through the SEC’s EDGAR database at www.sec.gov. 71 2 0 0 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t Corporation Information Board of Directors Dr. Lawrence R. Klein Member George E. Stoddard Member Dr. Karsten von Köller Member Senior Officers Wm. Polk Carey Chairman of the Board and Board Member Gordon F. DuGan President, Chief Executive Officer and Board Member John D. Miller Chief Investment Officer Mark J. DeCesaris Managing Director, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer Claude Fernandez Managing Director and Chief Accounting Officer Peter E. Kaplan, Jr. Director – Investments Gino M. Sabatini Director – Investments Yvonne Cheng First Vice President – Asset Management L. Janusz Hooker First Vice President – Investments Robert C. Kehoe First Vice President – Finance Jeffrey S. Lefleur First Vice President – Investments Mykolas Rambus First Vice President and Chief Information Officer Joseph W. Sanchez First Vice President – Accounting Gagan S. Singh First Vice President – Finance David G. Termine First Vice President – Accounting Benjamin P. Harris Managing Director – Investments Sheena R. Laughlin Director of Human Resources Jan F. Kärst Managing Director – Investments Corporate Information Edward V. LaPuma Managing Director – Investments Auditors PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP John J. Park Managing Director – Strategic Planning Anne Coolidge Taylor Managing Director – Investments Thomas E. Zacharias Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer Douglas E. Barzelay General Counsel Susan C. Hyde Executive Director and Director of Investor Relations Michael D. Roberts Executive Director and Controller Donna M. Neiley Senior Vice President – Asset Management Richard J. Paley Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel Thomas J. Ridings, Jr. Senior Vice President – Accounting Alistair D. Calvert Director – Investments (UK) Jason E. Fox Director – Investments Executive Offices W. P. Carey & Co. LLC 50 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 212-492-1100 1-800-WP CAREY Transfer Agent Mellon Investor Services LLC 480 Washington Boulevard Jersey City, NJ 07310 1-888-200-8690 Annual Meeting June 7, 2006 at 2:00 p.m. The New York Hilton Hotel 1335 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York Form 10-K A Copy of The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission may be obtained without charge at www.sec.gov or by writing the Executive Offices at the address above. Website www.wpcarey.com E-mail IR@wpcarey.com Wm. Polk Carey Chairman of the Board Gordon F. DuGan Chief Executive Officer and President Francis J. Carey Chairman of the Executive Committee, Chief Ethics Officer Nathaniel S. Coolidge Chairman of the Audit Committee; Former Head of Bond and Corporate Finance Department, John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company Eberhard Faber, IV Chairman of the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee; Former Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Dr. Lawrence R. Klein Chairman of the Economic Policy Committee; Nobel Laureate in Economics, Benjamin Franklin Professor Economics (Emeritus), University of Pennsylvania George E. Stoddard Former Chairman of the Investment Committee and Former Head of the Direct Placement Department, The Equitable Life Assurance Society of The United States Charles C. Townsend, Jr. Lead Director of the Board and Chairman of the Compensation Committee; Former Head of Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley & Co. Ralph F. Verni Chairman of the Investment Committee, Former President and Chief Executive Officer, State Street Research and Management Dr. Karsten von Köller Former Chairman and Member of the Board of Managing Directors, Eurohypo AG Reginald Winssinger Chairman of Horizon New America National Portfolio Inc. Investment Committee of Carey Asset Management Corp. Ralph F. Verni Chairman Nathaniel S. Coolidge Member 72 E-Delivery To receive future investor- related correspondence electronically go to www.wpcarey.com/edelivery Trading Information Shares of W. P. Carey & Co. LLC trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “WPC.” Distribution Information The following table sets forth, for the period indicated, the per share distributions paid to shareholders of record since inception: March 31, 1998 June 30, 1998 September 30, 1998 December 31, 1998 March 31, 1999 June 30, 1999 September 30, 1999 December 31, 1999 March 31, 2000 June 30, 2000 September 30, 2000 December 31, 2000 March 31, 2001 June 30, 2001 September 30, 2001 December 31, 2001 March 31, 2002 June 30, 2002 September 30, 2002 December 31, 2002 March 31, 2003 June 30, 2003 September 30, 2003 December 31, 2003 March 31, 2004 June 30, 2004 September 30, 2004 December 31, 2004 March 31, 2005 June 30, 2005 September 30, 2005 December 31, 2005 March 31, 2006 0.4125 0.4125 0.4125 0.4125 0.4175 0.4175 0.4175 0.4175 0.4225 0.4225 0.4225 0.4225 0.4225 0.4250 0.4260 0.4270 0.4280 0.4290 0.4300 0.4310 0.4320 0.4330 0.4340 0.4350 0.4360 0.4380 0.4400 0.4420 0.4440 0.4460 0.4480 0.4500 0.4520 W. P. CAREY & CO. LLC 50 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10020 212-492-1100 • www.wpcarey.com • IR@wpcarey.com NYSE: WPC