Waterstone Financial, Inc
Annual Report 2018

Plain-text annual report

April 11, 2019 Dear Fellow Shareholder, We invite you to attend the Waterstone Financial, Inc. Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held at WaterStone Bank SSB, 11200 W. Plank Ct., Wauwatosa, Wisconsin at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, on Tuesday, May 21, 2019. We are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders over the internet, as permitted by rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may read, print and download our 2018 Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K and our Proxy Statement at www.cstproxy.com/wsbonline/2019. On April 11, 2019, we mailed our shareholders a notice containing instructions on how to access these materials and how to vote their shares online. The notice provides instructions on how you can request a paper copy of these materials by mail, by telephone or by e-mail. If you requested your materials via e-mail, the e-mail contains voting instructions and links to the materials on the internet. You may vote your shares by internet, by telephone, by regular mail or in person at the Annual Meeting. Instructions regarding the various methods of voting are contained on the notice and on the Proxy Card. The proxy materials describe the formal business to be transacted at the Annual Meeting. Included in the materials is our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which contains detailed information concerning our activities and operating performance. On behalf of the board, we request that you vote your shares now, even if you currently plan to attend the Annual Meeting. This will not prevent you from voting in person, but will assure that your vote is counted. Sincerely, DOUGLAS S. GORDON Chief Executive Officer [This page has been intentionally left blank.] WATERSTONE FINANCIAL, INC. 11200 W. Plank Ct. Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226 (414) 761-1000 ______________________________ NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 21, 2019 _____________________________ To the Shareholders of Waterstone Financial, Inc.: The 2019 annual meeting of shareholders of Waterstone Financial, Inc. will be held on Tuesday, May 21, 2019, at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, at WaterStone Bank SSB, 11200 W. Plank Ct., Wauwatosa, Wisconsin for the following purposes: (1) Electing three directors to serve for a term expiring in 2022; (2) Approving an advisory, non-binding resolution to approve the executive compensation described in the Proxy Statement; (3) Ratifying the selection of RSM US LLP as Waterstone Financial, Inc.’s independent registered public accounting firm; and Transacting such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. The board of directors has fixed March 27, 2019 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting and any adjournment thereof. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on that date will be entitled to vote at the annual meeting and any adjournments thereof. We call your attention to the Proxy Statement accompanying this notice for a more complete statement regarding the matters to be acted upon at the annual meeting. Please read it carefully. By Order of the Board of Directors Wauwatosa, Wisconsin April 11, 2019 William F. Bruss Executive Vice President and Secretary [This page has been intentionally left blank.] PROXY STATEMENT WATERSTONE FINANCIAL, INC. 11200 W. Plank Ct. Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226 (414) 761-1000 ______________________ SOLICITATION AND VOTING This Proxy Statement and accompanying Proxy Card are furnished to the shareholders of Waterstone Financial, Inc. (“Waterstone Financial” or the “Company”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Waterstone Financial board of directors for use at the annual meeting of shareholders on Tuesday, May 21, 2019, and at any adjournment of the meeting. The 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K is enclosed with the Proxy Statement and contains business and financial information concerning us. Our proxy materials are being made available to shareholders on or about April 11, 2019. Record Date and Meeting Information. The board of directors has fixed March 27, 2019 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting and any adjournment thereof. Only holders of record of our common stock, the only class stock outstanding of Waterstone Financial outstanding, as of the close of business on the record date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote. As of the record date, there were 28,004,135 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The board of directors of Waterstone Financial knows of no matters to be acted upon at the annual meeting other than as set forth in the notice attached to this Proxy Statement. If any other matters properly come before the annual meeting, or any adjournment thereof, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote such proxies in accordance with their best judgment on such matters. Voting Your Shares. Any shareholder entitled to vote at the annual meeting may vote either in person, by a properly executed proxy or online as described in the notice to shareholders and the proxy card. Shares represented by properly executed proxies received by Waterstone Financial will be voted at the annual meeting, or any adjournment thereof, in accordance with the terms of such proxies, unless revoked. Where no instructions are indicated, validly executed proxies will be voted “FOR” the proposals set forth in this Proxy Statement for consideration at the Annual Meeting. A shareholder may revoke a proxy at any time prior to the time when it is voted by filing a written notice of revocation with our corporate secretary at the address set forth above, by delivering a properly executed proxy bearing a later date, using the internet or telephone voting options explained on the Proxy Card, or by voting in person at the annual meeting. Attendance at the annual meeting will not in itself constitute revocation of a proxy. If you are a shareholder whose shares are not registered in your name, you will need appropriate documentation from your record holder in order to vote in person at the annual meeting. Shares in Employee Plans. Any shareholder who owns shares through an allocation to that person’s account under the WaterStone Bank SSB 2015 Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”) or who has purchased shares in the Employer Stock Fund in the Waterstone Bank SSB 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) will receive separate Vote Authorization Forms to instruct the ESOP Trustee and 401(k) Plan Trustee how to vote those shares. The deadline for returning instructions is May 15, 2019. The Trustee of both the ESOP and 401(k) Plan, Principal Trust Company, will vote shares allocated to a plan participant’s account in accordance with the participant’s instructions. Upon the direction of the plan administrator, the Trustee will vote the unallocated ESOP shares and any allocated ESOP shares for which no voting instructions are received in the same proportion as allocated shares for which it has received voting instructions. In addition, the Trustee will vote unvoted shares allocated to participants’ accounts in the 401(k) Plan in accordance with directions received from the plan administrator. 1 Quorum and Required Vote. A majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the shares entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum of shareholders at the annual meeting. Shares for which authority is withheld to vote for director nominees and broker non-votes (i.e., proxies from brokers or nominees indicating that such persons have not received instructions from the beneficial owners or other persons entitled to vote shares as to a matter with respect to which the brokers or nominees do not have discretionary power to vote) will be considered present for purposes of establishing a quorum. The inspector of election appointed by the board of directors will count the votes and ballots at the annual meeting. As to the election of directors, shareholders may vote “FOR” or “WITHHELD” as to each or all of the nominees. A plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting by the holders of shares of common stock entitled to vote is required for the election of directors. In other words, the individuals who receive the largest number of votes are elected as directors up to the maximum number of directors in a class to be chosen at the annual meeting. With respect to the election of directors, any shares not voted, whether by withheld authority, broker non-vote or otherwise, will have no effect on the election of directors except to the extent that the failure to vote for an individual results in another individual receiving a comparatively larger number of votes. As to the advisory, non-binding resolution to approve our executive compensation as described in this Proxy Statement, a shareholder may: (i) vote “FOR” the resolution; (ii) vote “AGAINST” the resolution; or (iii) “ABSTAIN” from voting on the resolution. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, without regard to either broker non-votes, or shares as to which the “ABSTAIN” box has been selected on the proxy card, is required for the approval of this non-binding resolution. While this vote is required by law, it will neither be binding on Waterstone Financial, Inc. or the board of directors, nor will it create or imply any change in the fiduciary duties of, or impose any additional fiduciary duty on the members of the board of directors. As to the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm, shareholders may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST,” or may “ABSTAIN” from voting on the matter. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, without regard to either broker non-votes, or shares as to which the “ABSTAIN” box has been selected on the proxy card, is required to ratify RSM US LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019. Expenses and Solicitation. We will pay all expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies. Proxies will be solicited principally by mail, but may also be solicited by our directors, officers and other employees in person or by telephone, facsimile or other means of communication. Those directors, officers and employees will receive no compensation therefor in addition to their regular compensation, but may be reimbursed for their related out-of-pocket expenses. Brokers, dealers, banks, or their nominees, who hold common stock on behalf of another will be asked to send proxy materials and related documents to the beneficial owners of such stock, and we will reimburse those persons for their reasonable expenses. Householding. Some banks, brokers, broker-dealers and other similar organizations acting as nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” proxy materials. This means that only one copy of the notice of meeting and instructions on how to access the proxy materials and the 2018 Annual Report may have been sent to multiple stockholders in your household. If you would prefer to receive separate copies of these materials for other stockholders in your household, either now or in the future, please contact your bank, broker, broker-dealer or other similar organization serving as your nominee. Upon written notice to Mark R. Gerke, Chief Financial Officer, Waterstone Financial, Inc., 11200 W. Plank Ct., Wauwatosa, WI 53226, or via telephone at (414) 761-1000, we will promptly provide separate copies of the 2018 Annual Report and/or this Proxy Statement. Stockholders sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of this Proxy Statement and/or the 2018 Annual Report and who wish to receive a single copy of these materials in the future will need to contact their bank, broker, broker-dealer or other similar organization serving as their nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be mailed to all stockholders at the shared address in the future. Limitations on Voting. The Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that, subject to certain exceptions, record owners of the Company’s common stock that is beneficially owned by a person who beneficially owns in excess of 10% of the Company’s outstanding shares are not entitled to any vote any of the shares held in excess of the 10% limit. 2 BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK Persons and groups who beneficially own in excess of 5% of our shares of common stock are required to file certain reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding such ownership pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The following table sets forth, as of March 27, 2019, the shares of our common stock beneficially owned by each person known to us who was the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, as well as by our directors, executive officers and directors and executive officers as a group. Name of Beneficial Owner Owned (1) Stock Outstanding Total Shares Beneficially Percent of All Common 5% or Greater Shareholders Renaissance Technologies LLC Renaissance Technologies Holdings Corporation 800 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 Dimensional Fund Advisors LP Building One 6300 Bee Cave Road Austin, Texas 78746 BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Company dba Principal Trust Company as Trustee for the 2010 Amended and Restated Waterstone Bank SSB Employee Stock Ownership Plan and the Waterstone Bank 401(K) Plan 1013 Centre Road Suite 300 Wilmington, Delaware 19805-1265 Directors and Executive Officers Ellen S. Bartel ............................................ William F. Bruss ......................................... Thomas E. Dalum ....................................... Mark R. Gerke ............................................ Julie A. Glynn ............................................ Douglas S. Gordon...................................... Michael L. Hansen ...................................... Patrick S. Lawton ....................................... Kristine A. Rappé ....................................... Stephen J. Schmidt...................................... 2,270,245 (2) 8.0% 1,988,431 (3) 7.0% 1,613,268 (4) 2,496,826 (5) 78,000 108,778 175,127 67,175 4,000 564,421 316,413 280,990 91,318 120,078 5.7% 8.8% * * * * * 2.0% 1.1% * * * All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons) (6) ............................................. 3,386,971 12.1% Less than 1%. ______________________ * (1) Unless otherwise noted, the specified persons have sole voting and dispositive power as to the shares. Number of shares identified as indirect beneficial ownership with shared voting and dispositive power: Mr. Bruss – 54,902; Mr. Dalum – 61,596; Mr. Gerke – 22,109; Mr. Gordon – 59,261; Mr. Hansen – 186,541; Mr. Lawton – 10,532; group – 1,975,612. Includes the following shares underlying options which are exercisable within 60 days of March 27, 2019: Messrs. Bartel, Dalum, Hansen, Lawton, Rappe and Schmidt – 50,000 shares each; Mr. Bruss – 24,000; Mr. Gerke – 15,292; Ms. Glynn – 4,000; Mr. Gordon – 88,627; all directors and executive officers as a group – 431,919. (2) Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Renaissance Technologies LLC and Renaissance Technologies Holding Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2019. 3 (3) Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2019. (4) Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2019. (5) Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by the Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Company dba Principal Trust Company as Trustee for the 2010 Amended and Restated WaterStone Bank SSB Employee Stock Ownership Plan and the WaterStone Bank SSB 401(k) Plan with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2019. Such total includes shares purchased by plan participants in the Employer Stock Fund within the WaterStone Bank SSB 401(k) Plan, as well as allocated and unallocated shares held in trust within the WaterStone Bank SSB Employee Stock Ownership Plan. (6) The total for the group (but not any individual) includes 1,580,671 unallocated shares held in the employee stock ownership plan, as to which voting and dispositive power is shared. As administrator, WaterStone Bank SSB (“WaterStone Bank” or the “Bank”) (through its ESOP Committee) may direct the ESOP Trustee to vote shares which have not yet been allocated to participants, provided that such vote is required to be made in the same proportion as allocated voted shares unless it is determined that to do so would not be in the best interest of participants and beneficiaries of the ESOP. Employees may vote the shares allocated to their accounts; the administrator will vote unvoted shares in its discretion. Allocated shares are included only if allocated to listed executive officers, in which case they are included in those individuals’ (and the group’s) beneficial ownership. PROPOSAL 1 – THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS Waterstone Financial’s Board of Directors consists of seven members. Our bylaws provide that approximately one-third of the directors are to be elected annually. Directors of Waterstone Financial are generally elected to serve for a three-year period and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified. Directors Ellen S. Bartel, Thomas E. Dalum, and Kristine A Rappé. whose terms expire at the annual meeting, are being nominated for re-election as directors, each for a term expiring at the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders. Shares represented by proxies will be voted FOR the election of the nominees unless otherwise specified by the executing shareholder. If a nominee declines or is unable to act as a director, proxies may be voted with discretionary authority for a substitute nominee designated by the board. Except as indicated herein, there are no arrangements or understandings between any nominee and any other person pursuant to which such nominee was selected. The following details include for each of our nominees and directors: their age as of December 31, 2018; the year in which they first became a director of WaterStone Bank, the operating subsidiary of the Company; the year that their term expires; and their business experience for at least the past five years. [Note that the members of the Company’s Board of Directors are the same as the members Board of Directors of WaterStone Bank.] None of the directors listed below currently serves as a director, or served as a director during the past five years, of a publicly- held entity (other than Waterstone Financial). The following also includes the particular experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee that led the board of directors to conclude that such person should serve as a director of Waterstone Financial. The mailing address for each person listed is 11200 W. Plank Ct., Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226. The board of directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote FOR the election of the director nominees listed below. Name and Age Ellen S. Bartel, 64 (3)(4)(5) Director Since (1) 2013 Principal Occupation and Business Experience Nominees for Terms expiring in 2022 Ms. Bartel is the former President of Divine Savior Holy Angels (DSHA) High School (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) since 1998 where she achieved significant improvements in DSHA’s curriculum, facilities, financial infrastructure, image, and reputation. Ms. Bartel balanced DSHA’s budget for 18 consecutive years, oversaw endowment growth from under $1 million to over $14 million, and developed recruitment strategies resulting in an incoming class wait list for 19 consecutive years. Prior to her employment at DSHA, Ms. Bartel held several positions at Alverno College (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) (1986 to 1997), with the most recent being Vice President of Institutional Advancement from 1994 to 1997. Ms. Bartel’s experience overseeing a large educational institution provides the board of directors with significant perspective on financial management and human resources matters. Ms. Bartel has a B.A. and an M.S.A. from the University of Notre Dame. 4 Thomas E. Dalum, 78 (3)(5) Kristine A. Rappé, 62 (5)(6) Mr. Dalum is the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of UELC, an equipment leasing company and of DUECO, an equipment manufacturer and distributor. Mr. Dalum brings an entrepreneurial background, a long-standing record of community involvement and public service plus more than 30 years of experience as a member of the WaterStone Bank board of directors. Mr. Dalum has a B.A. from the University of Notre Dame and an M.B.A. from Northwestern University. Ms. Rappé is the former Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of WEC Energy Group (2004-2012). Her roles at WEC Energy Group also included Vice President and Corporate Secretary (2001 to 2004) and Vice President of Customer Services (1994 to 2001). In these roles, Ms. Rappé had responsibility for shared services including information technology, human resources, supply chain management, business continuity/corporate security, and the WEC Foundation. Ms. Rappé’s experience overseeing a large corporate entity provides the board of directors with significant perspective on financial management and human resources matters, and she has a long-standing history of community involvement and public service. Ms. Rappé has a B.A. from the University of Wisconsin – Oshkosh. 1979 2013 Continuing Directors - Terms expiring in 2020 Michael L. Hansen, 67 (4)(5)(6) Mr. Hansen is a business investor who currently holds significant ownership interests in Jacsten Holdings LLC and Mid-States Contracting, Inc. In addition to holding extensive entrepreneurial experience, Mr. Hansen is a C.P.A. with 13 years of audit and tax experience at an international public accounting firm. Mr. Hansen brings this experience to the board of directors and to the Audit Committee in particular. Mr. Hansen has a B.B.A. from the University of Notre Dame. 2003 Stephen J. Schmidt, 57 (3)(4)(6) Mr. Schmidt is the President of Schmidt and Bartelt Funeral and Cremation Services. Mr. Schmidt has entrepreneurial experience and extensive community relationships throughout the communities served by WaterStone Bank. Mr. Schmidt has an Associate’s Degree from the New England Institute and a B.A. from the University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point. 2002 Continuing Directors - Terms expiring in 2021 Douglas S. Gordon, 61 Mr. Gordon is the Chief Executive Officer and President of Waterstone Financial and WaterStone Bank since January 2007; President and Chief Operating Officer of WaterStone Bank from 2005 to 2007; real estate investor. Mr. Gordon brings extensive prior banking experience as an executive officer at M&I Bank and at Security Savings Bank. He has extensive firsthand knowledge and experience with our lending markets and our customers. Mr. Gordon has a B.A. from the University of Wisconsin – Parkside and an M.B.A. from Marquette University. 2005 Patrick S. Lawton, 62 (2)(3)(6) Mr. Lawton is the Managing Director of Fixed Income Capital Markets for Baird. Mr. Lawton is also a member of Baird’s board of directors. As a Baird Managing Director, Mr. Lawton brings his investment portfolio expertise to the board of directors. Mr. Lawton has a B.S.B.A. and an M.B.A. from Marquette University. 2000 _________ (1) Indicates the date when director was first elected to the board of WaterStone Bank. Messrs. Lawton, Hansen, Dalum, Schmidt and Gordon became directors of Waterstone Financial’s predecessor federal corporation in 2005. Ms. Bartel and Ms. Rappé became directors of Waterstone Financial in 2014. (2) Chairman of the Board and of WaterStone Bank, effective January 1, 2007. (3) Member of the Compensation Committee, of which Mr. Dalum is Chairman. (4) Member of the Nominating Committee, of which Mr. Schmidt and Ms. Bartel are Co-chairmen. (5) Member of the Audit Committee, of which Mr. Hansen is Chairman. (6) Member of the Executive Committee, of which Ms. Rappé is Chairman. 5 The following table details the composition of our board committees, each of which is composed entirely of independent directors. Director Ellen S. Bartel Thomas E Dalum Michael L. Hansen Patrick S. Lawton (Chair) Kristine A. Rappé, Stephen J. Schmidt Audit Committee X X Chair X Compensation Committee X Chair X X Executive Committee Nominating and Governance Committee Chair X X Chair X X Chair Information regarding named executive officers who are not directors of Waterstone Financial is set forth in the following table. Except as noted below, each of these individuals has held that position for at least the past five years. Name and Age William F. Bruss, 49 Mark R. Gerke, 44 Julie A. Glynn, 54 Offices and Positions with Waterstone Financial and WaterStone Bank Executive Vice President since January 2015, Chief Operating Officer (appointed June 2013), General Counsel and Secretary, Waterstone Financial and WaterStone Bank Chief Financial Officer since February 2016, Chief Accounting Officer (appointed 2014), Senior Vice President, Waterstone Financial and WaterStone Bank since 2014, Controller 2005 to February 2016 Senior Vice President and Director of Retail Banking of WaterStone Bank since March 2018, Senior Vice President - District Manager of Associated Bank since 2013 Board Meetings and Committees Executive Officer Since 2005 2016 2018 The board of directors of Waterstone Financial met 12 times during the year ended December 31, 2018 on behalf of Waterstone Financial and an additional 13 times in their capacity as directors of WaterStone Bank. The board of directors consists of a majority of “independent directors” within the meaning of the NASDAQ corporate governance listing standards. The board of directors determines the independence of each director in accordance with NASDAQ Stock Market rules, which include all elements of independence as set forth in the listing requirements for NASDAQ securities. The board of directors has determined that Directors Bartel, Dalum, Hansen, Lawton, Rappé and Schmidt are “independent” directors within the meaning of such standards. In evaluating the independence of our independent directors, we found no transactions between us and our independent directors that are not required to be reported in this Proxy Statement and that had an impact on our determination as to the independence of our directors. Therefore, all members of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees are “independent.” Additionally, the independent directors regularly meet without management or non-independent directors present. No member of the board of directors or any committee thereof attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of: (i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors (held during the period for which each director has been a director); and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the board of directors on which he or she served (during the periods that he or she served). The audit committee of Waterstone Financial (the “Audit Committee”) met eight times during the year ended December 31, 2018. The board of directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets not only the independence requirements applicable to the committee as prescribed by the NASDAQ corporate governance listing standards, but also by the Securities and Exchange Commission. On behalf of the Audit Committee, Mr. Hansen, its chair, also regularly consults with Waterstone Financial’s independent registered public accounting firm about Waterstone Financial’s periodic public financial disclosures. The board believes that all of the members of the 6 Audit Committee have sufficient experience, knowledge and other personal qualifications to be “financially literate” and to be active, effective and contributing members of the Audit Committee. Mr. Hansen has been designated an “audit committee financial expert” pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Securities and Exchange Commission regulations. See also “Report of the Audit Committee” for other information pertaining to the Audit Committee. The compensation committee of Waterstone Financial (the “Compensation Committee”) held nine meetings during the year ended December 31, 2018. Each member of the Compensation Committee is considered independent as defined in the NASDAQ corporate governance listing standards. The Compensation Committee has the responsibility for and authority to either establish or recommend to the board: compensation policies and plans; salaries, bonuses and benefits for all officers; salary and benefit levels for employees; determinations with respect to stock options and restricted stock awards; and other personnel policies and procedures. The Compensation Committee has the authority to delegate the development, implementation and execution of benefit plans to management. See also “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” for other information pertaining to the Compensation Committee. The nominating and corporate governance committee (“Nominating Committee”) of Waterstone Financial held one meeting during the year ended December 31, 2018. Each member of the Nominating Committee is considered “independent” as defined in the NASDAQ corporate governance listing standards. The functions of the Nominating Committee include the following: • • • • to lead the search for individuals qualified to become members of the board of directors and to select director nominees to be presented for shareholder approval; to review and monitor compliance with the requirements for board independence; to review the committee structure and make recommendations to the board of directors regarding committee membership; and to develop and recommend to the board of directors for its approval a set of corporate governance guidelines. The Nominating Committee identifies nominees by first evaluating the current members of the board of directors willing to continue in service. Current members of the board of directors with skills and experience that are relevant to our business and who are willing to continue in service are first considered for re-nomination, balancing the value of continuity of service by existing members of the board of directors with that of obtaining new perspectives. If any member of the board of directors does not wish to continue in service, or if the committee or the board decides not to re-nominate a member for re-election, or if the size of the board of directors is increased, the Nominating Committee would solicit suggestions for director candidates from all directors. Qualifications of director candidates are described in the Appendix to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, which can be found on our website, at www.wsbonline.com, on the “Investor Relations” link under the “About” tab, then “Corporate Overview” and “Governance Documents.”. Factors considered include strength of character, honesty and integrity, an inquiring and independent mind, judgment, skill, diversity, education, experience with businesses and other organizations, the interplay of the candidates’ experience with the experience of other board members and the extent to which the candidate would be a desirable addition to the board and its committees. Nominees must have a background which demonstrates an understanding of business and financial affairs and the complexities of a business organization. Although a career in business is not essential, the nominee should have a proven record of competence and accomplishments through leadership in industry, education, the professions or government. Areas of core competency that should be represented on the board as a whole include accounting and finance, business judgment, management, crisis response, industry knowledge, leadership and strategic vision. The Nominating Committee will also take into account whether a candidate satisfies the criteria for “independence” under the NASDAQ corporate governance listing standards and, if a nominee is sought for service on the Audit Committee, the financial and accounting expertise of a candidate, including whether an individual qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert.” 7 The Nominating Committee will consider proposed nominees whose names are submitted to it by shareholders, and it does not intend to evaluate proposed nominees differently depending upon who has made the proposal. Shareholders can submit the names of qualified candidates for director by writing to our Corporate Secretary at 11200 W. Plank Ct., Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226. The Corporate Secretary must receive a submission not earlier than the 90th day nor later than the 80th day prior to date of the annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that less than 90 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting is provided to shareholders, then, to be timely, notice by the stockholder must be so received not later than the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. The submission must include the following information: • • • • • • • • • a statement that the writer is a shareholder and is proposing a candidate for consideration by the Nominating Committee; the name and address of the shareholder as they appear on our books and number of shares of our common stock that are owned beneficially by such shareholder (if the shareholder is not a holder of record, appropriate evidence of the shareholder’s ownership will be required); the name, address and contact information for the candidate, and the number of shares of common stock that are owned by the candidate (if the candidate is not a holder of record, appropriate evidence of the shareholder’s ownership should be provided); a statement of the candidate’s business and educational experience; such other information regarding the candidate as would be required to be included in the Proxy Statement pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation 14A; a statement detailing any relationship between us and the candidate; a statement detailing any relationship between the candidate and any of our customers, suppliers or competitors; detailed information about any relationship or understanding between the proposing shareholder and the candidate; and a statement that the candidate is willing to be considered and willing to serve as a director if nominated and elected. A nomination submitted by a shareholder for presentation at an annual meeting of shareholders will also need to comply with any additional procedural and informational requirements we may adopt in the future, including those set forth in our Bylaws and in the “Shareholder Proposals and Notices” section of this Proxy Statement. Waterstone Financial has adopted charters for the audit, compensation and Nominating Committees. We will continue to respond to and comply with Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ Stock Market requirements relating to board committees. Copies of the charters for our audit, compensation and Nominating Committees (including director selection criteria) and other corporate governance documents can be found on our website, at www.wsbonline.com, on the “Corporate Overview” tab under the link “Investors.” If any of those documents are changed, or related documents adopted, those changes and new documents will be posted on our corporate website at that address. Other Board and Corporate Governance Matters Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight Role. The role of chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer of the Company are not currently held by the same person. The chairman of the board has never been an officer or employee of the Company or WaterStone Bank. The foregoing structure is not mandated by any provision of law or our Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, but the board of directors currently believes that this structure provides for an appropriate balance of authority between management and the board. The board of directors reserves the right to establish a different structure in the future. The board of directors of the Company, all of the members of which are also members of the board of directors of WaterStone Bank, is actively involved in the Company’s and Bank’s risk oversight activities, through the work of numerous committees of the Company and Bank, and the policy approval function of the board of directors of WaterStone Bank. 8 Communications between Shareholders and the Board. A shareholder who wants to communicate with the board of directors or with any individual director can write to our Corporate Secretary at 11200 W. Plank Ct., Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226, Attention: Board Administration. The letter should indicate that the author is a shareholder and if shares are not held of record, should include appropriate evidence of stock ownership. Depending on the subject matter, management will: • • • forward the communication to the director or directors to whom it is addressed; attempt to handle the inquiry directly, i.e. where it is a request for information about us or it is a stock- related matter; or not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in nature, relates to an improper or irrelevant topic, or is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or otherwise inappropriate. At each board meeting, management shall present a summary of all communications received since the last meeting that were not forwarded and make those communications available to the directors. Director Attendance at Annual Shareholders’ Meeting. Although we do not have a formal policy regarding director attendance at the annual meeting, we encourage all of our directors to attend. Last year, four of the seven directors serving at that time were present at the annual meeting. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Waterstone Financial has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that reflects current circumstances and Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ definitions for such codes. The code of business conduct and ethics covers us, WaterStone Bank and other subsidiaries. Among other things, the code of business conduct and ethics includes provisions regarding honest and ethical conduct, conflicts of interest, full and fair disclosure, compliance with law, and reporting of and sanctions for violations. The code applies to all directors, officers and employees of Waterstone Financial and subsidiaries. We have posted a copy of the code of business conduct and ethics on our website, at www.wsbonline.com, on the “Investor Relations” link under the “About” tab, then “Corporate Overview” and “Governance Documents.” As further matters are documented, or if those documents (including the code of business conduct and ethics) are changed, waivers from the code of business conduct and ethics are granted, or new procedures are adopted, those new documents, changes and/or waivers will be posted on the corporate website at that address. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Overview of Compensation Program Executive Summary. The Compensation Committee provides our Named Executive Officers with a total compensation package that is market competitive, promotes the achievement of our strategic objectives and is aligned with operating and other performance metrics to support long-term shareholder value. In addition, we have structured our executive compensation program to include elements that are intended to create appropriate balance between risk and reward. Compensation Philosophy. The primary objectives of our executive compensation programs are to attract and retain highly-qualified executives and to encourage extraordinary management efforts through well-designed incentive opportunities, with the goal of improving the performance of Waterstone Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries consistent with the interests of our shareholders. We base our compensation decisions on three basic principles: • • Meeting the Demands of the Market – We compensate our employees at competitive levels that position us as the employer of choice among our peers who provide similar financial services in the markets we serve. Aligning with Shareholders – We use equity compensation as a key component of our compensation mix to promote a culture of ownership among our key personnel and to align their individual financial interests with the long-term interests of our shareholders. 9 • Driving Performance – We base compensation in part on the attainment of company-wide, business unit and individual targets that result in the achievement of both short-term and long-term financial objectives, while ensuring sound risk management. Elements of our Executive Compensation and Benefits Program. To achieve our objectives, we have structured an executive compensation and program that provides our Named Executive Officers with the following: • • • • • • Competitive Base salary; Short-Term Cash-Based Incentives; Equity Incentive Awards; Broad-Based Welfare and Retirement Benefit Plans; Perquisites; and Executive Agreements. The programs are intended to reward the accomplishment of strategic plan goals and objectives as evaluated by members of the Compensation Committee. They are further intended to reward enhanced shareholder value as measured by the trading price of our common stock. The elements of a Named Executive Officer’s total compensation package will vary depending upon the executive’s job position and responsibilities. Compensation Polices and Highlights Our compensation programs include, among others, the following best practices: What We Do ü The Compensation Committee has engaged an independent compensation consultant. ü The Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent directors. ü New for 2019: We maintain stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers. ü New for 2019: We maintain stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors. ü New for 2019: We maintain a clawback policy. ü New for 2019: We restrict our directors and officers from (i) holding Company securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan or (ii) engaging in hedging transactions in the Company’s securities. ü We provide a say-on-pay advisory vote on an annual basis until the next required vote on the frequency of shareholder votes on executive compensation. What We Do Not Do ´ We do not encourage excessive risk-taking behavior through our compensation plans. ´ We do not reprice underwater stock options. ´ We do not grant options with an exercise price less than fair market value on date of grant. ´ We do not provide excessive perquisites tour NEOs. ´ We do not provide excise tax gross ups in our compensation plans or employment agreements. ´ We do not guarantee salary increases. ´ We do not provide for uncapped bonuses. ´ We do not provide for “single-trigger” benefits upon a change in control. Effect of 2018 Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation 2018 Say-on-Pay Results. At our 2018 Annual Meeting, we provided our shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on executive compensation (a “say-on-pay proposal”). At our 2018 annual meeting of shareholders, only 49.2% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal at that meeting were voted in favor of the proposal. Previously, we had received stronger levels of support for our executive compensation program from our shareholders (85.8% in 2017, 83.7% in 2016 and 88.6% in 2015). 10 Shareholder Outreach and Review of Named Executive Officer Compensation. In response to our shareholder vote in 2018, we performed a thorough review of our compensation programs and compensation policies and had conversations with a significant number of our largest investors. To ensure that we were responsive to our shareholder’s concerns, this review included the following elements: • • • • • We conducted a proactive shareholder outreach program to listen to our shareholder’s concerns and answer questions about our compensation programs, polices and related disclosures. The outreach objective was to reach the top 40% of our shareholder base. We reviewed the proxy advisor firms’ recommendations regarding executive compensation to evaluate where our compensation deviated from their expectations. We reviewed the compensation programs of our peer companies and evaluated their compensation practices to determine where we may benefit from adopting new plans, programs or policies. We examined our proxy disclosures to assess the effectiveness of communication related to our compensation practices. We retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) to assist in developing a size and industry appropriate peer group and comparing our compensation practices to those peer companies. Response to Shareholder Outreach. We are appreciative of the shareholders who were willing to share their perspectives throughout our outreach process. Our Compensation Committee takes shareholders’ input seriously and is committed to ongoing future shareholder outreach efforts. Based upon the feedback that we received from our shareholder outreach efforts, review of proxy advisory firm recommendations, review of peer practices and review of recommendations from Meridian, we have made the following enhancements to our compensation practices: What We Heard from Shareholders Changes We Made Absence of certain compensation risk mitigation policies • Adopted executive stock ownership guidelines • Adopted non-employee director stock ownership guidelines • Adopted Clawback Policy • Adopted an anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy Absence of performance-based compensation with a direct alignment with financial objectives • For 2019, adopted an Annual Incentive Plan for our named executive officers • The Annual Incentive Plan provides for the payment of an annual cash bonus upon the achievement of financial-based performance metrics Absence of a disclosed peer group • For 2019, we retained Meridian, who developed a size and industry appropriate peer group • For 2019, we evaluated our compensation practices compared to our peers when making key 2019 compensation decisions These new changes demonstrate our commitment to strong corporate governance and our responsiveness to our shareholders, and are in addition to the following compensation policies and practices we already had in place to service our shareholder’s long-term interests, which are described under “Compensation Policies and Highlights” above. We will hold annual say-on-pay votes until the next shareholders vote regarding the frequency of say-on-pay votes, which we expect to occur at the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders. The Compensation Committee will 11 continue to consider the outcome of our say-on-pay vote, regulatory changes and emerging best practices when making future compensation decisions for the Named Executive Officers. Adoption of 2019 Annual Incentive Plan. As noted above, in March 2019, we implemented a new Annual Incentive Plan which provides named executive officers of WaterStone Bank with annual cash incentive opportunities for 2019 performance. The ability to earn any award is contingent on the Company achieving consolidated financial- based metrics. These metrics will be measured against actual results or actual results compared to our annual budget. The objective of our Annual Incentive Plan is to motivate and reward executives for achieving or exceeding annual financial, strategic and operational goals that we believe will help us maintain long-term profitable growth, maintain asset quality and support value creation for shareholders. The Chief Executive of Waterstone Mortgage Corporation will not participate in the Annual Incentive Plan, but will instead, continue to participate in a cash-based annual incentive plan as set forth in his employment agreement. Incentive awards will be calculated based upon the Company’s performance in one of three weighted financial-based measures along with a potential discretionary portion contingent upon achievement of strategic or operational non-financial objectives. With respect to the financial-based measures, performance will be measured against the Board-approved 2019 budget or against actual results. To receive any award under the Annual Incentive Plan, the named executive officer must be actively employed on the day the award is made. Performance Payout In designing the Annual Incentive Program, the Compensation Committee emphasized the Company’s goals of maintaining profitability, maintaining a strong credit culture and enhancing our franchise value through core deposit growth. The Compensation Committee determined that to encourage these goals, the Annual Incentive Plan would include the following performance measures: Performance Measure Weight Evaluated Against Rationale Return on Average Assets 40% Budget Non-Performing Assets 30% Actual Core Deposit Growth 15% Actual Discretionary 15% Total Weighting 100% Focuses management on achieving budgeted net income. Focuses management on adhering to appropriate risk management practices. Focuses management on less costly deposits and growth of business and retail checking and savings accounts, which will help to improve net interest margin. Contingent on individual achievement of strategic or operational non-financial objectives. o Adoption of Clawback Policy. In March 2019, we implemented a Clawback Policy, which provides that in the event that the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to its material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements under U.S. securities laws, the Company shall, to the extent permitted by governing law, pursue reimbursement of any performance-based compensation paid to the named executive officer, to the extent such payments and grants were made during the three-year period preceding the date on which the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement based on the erroneous data, provided that the Compensation Committee or determine that the amount of any such performance-based compensation actually paid or awarded to the named executive officer would have been a lower amount had it been calculated based on such restated financial statements. 12 Determining Named Executive Officer Compensation Role of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing all compensation components for the Named Executive Officers annually, including base salary, annual incentive, long- term incentives/equity, benefits and other perquisites. The Compensation Committee examines the total compensation mix, pay-for-performance relationship, and how all these elements in the aggregate comprise each executive’s total compensation package to ensure that our compensation is competitive in the market place and that the mix of benefits accurately reflects our compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter that establishes its responsibilities. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors review the charter annually to ensure that the scope of the charter is consistent with the role of the Compensation Committee. A copy of the charter can be found on our website on the “Investor Relations” link under the “About” tab, then “Corporate Overview” and “Governance Documents.” Role of Management. The executive officers who serve as a resource to the Compensation Committee are the President and Chief Executive Officer, with respect to compensation for the other Named Executive Officers, and the Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel and the Assistant Vice President and Director of Human Resources, with respect to compensation of other officers and employees of WaterStone Bank. The executives provide the Compensation Committee with data, analyses, input and recommendation. The Compensation Committee considers our Chief Executive Officer’s evaluation of each Named Executive Officer’s performance and recommendation of appropriate compensation. However, our Chief Executive Officer does not participate in any decisions relating to his own compensation. Use of Consultants. The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage compensation consultants from time to time to assist it in the compensation governance process for determining the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. Although the Compensation Committee did not engage a compensation consultant for purposes of making decisions regarding named executive officer compensation in 2018, based upon the results of our shareholder outreach, for 2019, the Compensation Committee engaged Meridian to perform an analysis of compensation for our Directors, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President/Director of Retail Banking. In conducting this analysis, Meridian developed competitive data for base salaries, short-term incentive, long-term incentives and total compensation from proxies and SEC filings of select peer banks ranging in asset size from $1.1 billion to $3.7 billion. In addition to asset size, peer group selection was also focused on banks with significant mortgage banking operations and/or banks that were recent mutual-to-stock conversions. For 2019, the Compensation Committee approved the following peer group for purposes of evaluating the appropriateness of the compensation package for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President/Director of Retail Banking: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Bank Financial Corporation, Burr Ridge, IL Blue Hills Bancorp, Inc., Norwood, MA BSB Bancorp, Inc., Belmont, MA Carolina Financial Corporation, Charleston, SC Civista Bancshares, Inc., Sandusky, OH ESSA Bancorp, Inc., Stroudsburg, PA Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc., Archbold, OH First Defiance Financial Corp., Defiance, OH FS Bancorp, Inc., Mountlake Terrance, WA Green County Bancorp, Inc., Catskill, NY HarborOne Bancorp, Inc., Brocton, MA Hingham Institutions for Savings, Hingham, MA Independent Bank Corporation, Grand Rapids, MI Macatawa Bank Corporation, Holland, MI MutualFirst Financial, Inc., Muncie, IN MVB Financial Corp., Fairmont, WV Sterling Bancorp, Inc., Southfield, MI United Community Financial Corp., Youngstown, OH 13 Components of Executive Compensation and 2018 Decisions Overview. Our compensation program consists of five main components: base salary, annual incentives, long-term incentive/equity, board-based welfare and retirement benefit plans and perquisites. The following section summarizes the role of each component, how decisions are made and the resulting 2018 decision process as it relates to the named executive officers. Base Salary. In determining the base salary of executive officers for 2018, the Compensation Committee reviewed, among other things, third party surveys of peer institutions, the historical compensation of those officers under review and performance measures of Waterstone Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Base salaries for named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer are determined based upon recommendations made by the Chief Executive Officer. Name and Principal Position Douglas S. Gordon Chief Executive Officer of Waterstone Financial and WaterStone Bank William F. Bruss Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel of Waterstone Financial and WaterStone Bank Mark R. Gerke Chief Financial Officer of Waterstone Financial and WaterStone Bank Julie A. Glynn Senior Vice President and Director of Retail of WaterStone Bank (1) A.W. Pickel, III Former President of Waterstone Mortgage Corporation (2)(3) 2018 ($) 850,000 2017 ($) 850,000 Change ($) — Change (%) — 309,000 300,000 9,000 3% 200,000 170,000 30,000 17.7% 185,000 300,000 — — — — — — (1) Ms. Glynn was appointed Senior Vice President/Director of Retail Banking on March 26, 2018. (2) Mr. Pickel was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Waterstone Mortgage Corporation on September 25, 2018. (3) Mr. Pickel’s employment with the Company was terminated on March 25, 2019. Bonus – WaterStone Bank. Following shareholder approval of the Waterstone Financial, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan on March 3, 2015, the Compensation Committee of WaterStone Bank has typically not paid cash bonuses to Named Executive Officers who are also officers of WaterStone Bank, but instead awarded equity incentives, which have been deemed to better align the long-term interests of Named Executive Officers with those of shareholders. Additional details regarding equity incentives are provided below. Ms. Glynn, who was appointed Senior Vice President and Director of Retail on March 26, 2018, was awarded an annual cash bonus of $40,000. In future years, Ms. Glynn will be eligible to receive awards under the Annual Incentive Plan. No cash bonuses were awarded to WaterStone Bank Named Executive Officers during 2017. Bonus – Waterstone Mortgage Corporation. During 2018, A.W. Pickel, III, Chief Executive Officer of Waterstone Mortgage Corporation, was awarded an annual cash bonus of $75,000 in accordance with the terms of his employment agreement dated June 19, 2018. The Chief Executive Officer of Waterstone Mortgage Corporation has historically been eligible to earn an annual cash-based bonus based upon pre-tax income earned by Waterstone Mortgage Corporation. During 2018, neither Eric Egenhoefer, who resigned as Chief Executive Officer, effective September 15, 2018, nor A.W. Pickel, III, who was appointed Chief Executive Officer on September 25, 2018, participated in an annual incentive plan. Equity Incentives. The Compensation Committee believes that equity-based compensation can provide an important incentive to executive officers while also aligning their interests with those of shareholders, since the value of the compensation will depend upon stock price performance. The equity incentive elements of total compensation are intended to further the Compensation Committee’s objectives of executive retention through longer vesting schedules and enhanced shareholder value due to the value of grants being tied to the trading price of our common stock. All equity awards given to the Named Executive Officers of WaterStone Bank are at the discretion of the 14 Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee considers the position of the Named Executive Officer, the officer’s level of influence and the corresponding ability to contribute toward the success of Waterstone Financial, Inc., and individual and corporate performance as well as the level of equity awards granted to individuals with similar positions at similar companies. In March 2015, both restricted stock awards and option awards were granted to directors and WaterStone Bank executive officers, except for the Chief Financial Officer, under our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. In June 2016, both restricted stock awards and option awards were granted to the Chief Financial Officer. In April 2018, 20,000 incentive stock option awards were granted to the Senior Vice President/Director of Retail Banking. No new awards of restricted stock were granted to any of the named executives during 2018. The Compensation Committee believes that the grants made in 2015 and 2016 still serve the intended purpose of executive and shareholder alignment. See “Executive Compensation-Plan-Based Awards” for additional information about grants made to WaterStone Bank executive officers. The restricted stock awards granted to employees under this plan vest in five installments over four years with the first installment vesting two days after date of grant. The restricted stock awards granted to directors under this plan vest in eight installments over seven years with the first installment vesting two days after date of grant. In the event of an involuntary termination of employment following a change in control, the unvested equity incentive awards held by each recipient will vest automatically. Broad-Based Welfare and Retirement Benefit Plans. The purpose of welfare and retirement benefit plans are to ensure our compensation packages are competitive and to provide an opportunity for retirement savings. We maintain a number of broad-based welfare benefit plans that are available to our employees, including Named Executive Officers. We provide group medical, dental and vision insurance coverage plans to employees, with employees being responsible for a portion of the premiums. We also offer our employees, including named executive officers, participation in tax-qualified defined benefit contribution plans. WaterStone Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). The ESOP is a tax-qualified retirement plan that benefits all eligible WaterStone Bank employees proportionately. The ESOP is not separately considered in the review and evaluation of annual executive compensation. ESOP allocations are made annually as of December 31 to all eligible WaterStone Bank employees. An employee must complete a full year of service and be employed by us on December 31 in order to receive an annual allocation each year. A trustee holds the shares purchased by the ESOP in an unallocated suspense account. Shares are released from the suspense account on a pro-rata basis as the ESOP repays the loan. The trustee allocates the shares released among participants on the basis of the participant’s proportional share of compensation relative to all participants. In the event of plan termination, all allocated benefits become fully vested immediately, any outstanding loan will be repaid from shares in the unallocated suspense account and the amounts remaining in the suspense account will be allocated to participant accounts proportionally. Dividends paid with respect to shares of Waterstone Financial, Inc. stock in the unallocated suspense account may be used to repay any ESOP loan. To the extent the dividends exceeded the annual loan payment, the remaining dividend amount would cause additional shares to be allocated to participants or may be credited proportionately to participant accounts. WaterStone Bank 401(k) Plan. WaterStone Bank maintains the WaterStone Bank 401(k) Plan, a tax- qualified defined contribution retirement plan, for all WaterStone Bank, including Named Executive Officers, who have satisfied the 401(k) Plan’s eligibility requirements. All eligible employees can begin participation in the 401(k) Plan on the first day of the month that coincides with or follows the date the employee attains age 18. A participant may contribute up to 90% of his or her compensation to the 401(k) Plan on a pre-tax basis, subject to the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. A participant is 100% vested in his or her salary deferral contributions. In addition to salary deferral contributions, the 401(k) Plan provides that WaterStone Bank will make matching contributions on 20% of the first 5% of the participant’s salary that is contributed to the 401(k) Plan. Waterstone Mortgage 401(k) Plan. Waterstone Mortgage maintains the Waterstone Mortgage 401(k) Plan, a tax-qualified defined contribution retirement plan, for all Waterstone Mortgage employees, including Named Executive Officers, who have satisfied the 401(k) Plan’s eligibility requirements. All eligible employees can begin participation in the 401(k) Plan on the first day of the month that coincides with or follows the date the employee 15 attains age 21 and completes 60 days of service. A participant may contribute up to 100% of his or her eligible compensation to the 401(k) Plan on a pre-tax basis, subject to the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. A participant is 100% vested in his or her salary deferral contributions. In addition to salary deferral contributions, the 401(k) Plan provides that Waterstone Mortgage will make matching contributions on 50% of the first 6% of the participant’s salary that is contributed to the 401(k) Plan. Perquisites. Perquisites comprise a small portion of our total compensation package. The main perquisites we provide are use of a company-owned vehicle or an automobile allowance for selected officers. Although these perquisites may involve personal use, we believe that they are reasonable and consistent with the overall compensation program to assist with attracting and retaining executive officers. Stock Ownership Guidelines To align the interests of the Company’s named executive officers and non-employee directors with the interests of the Company’s shareholders, in March 2019, the Company implemented stock ownership guidelines, where named executive officers of WaterStone Bank are required to own shares of common stock equal to a specified multiple of their annual base salary and non-employee directors are required to own shares of common stock equal to a multiple of such director’s annual board cash retainer. The applicable levels are as follows: Chief Executive Officer 3x base salary Chief Financial Officer 2x base salary 1x base salary Other NEO’s 3x annual board cash retainer Directors NEO’s and non-employee directors have five years from the date that the individual first become subject to the guidelines to meet these ownership requirements. As of December 31, 2018, all directors would have been in compliance with the Company’s stock ownership guidelines. As of December 31, 2018, all NEO’s that have been employed with the Company for at least five years would have been in compliance with the Company’s stock ownership guidelines. Compensation Committee Report The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Proxy Statement. Compensation Committee: Thomas E. Dalum, Chairman Ellen S. Bartel Patrick S. Lawton Stephen J. Schmidt 16 PROPOSAL 2 – ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The compensation of our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company (“Named Executive Officers”) is described above in general and is shown in detail in the Executive Compensation and Compensation Discussion and Analysis sections. Shareholders are urged to read the Executive Compensation and Compensation Discussion and Analysis sections of this Proxy Statement, which discusses our compensation policies and procedures with respect to our Named Executive Officers. In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, shareholders will be asked at the Annual Meeting to provide their support with respect to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers by voting on the following advisory, non-binding resolution: RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the “named executive officers,” as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Item 402 Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 2018 compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby approved. We will hold annual say-on-pay votes until the next shareholders vote regarding the frequency of say-on-pay votes, which we expect to occur at the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders. This advisory vote, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” advisory vote, is non-binding on the board of directors. Although non-binding, the board of directors and the Compensation Committee value constructive dialogue on executive compensation and other important governance topics with our shareholders and encourage all shareholders to vote their shares on this matter. The board of directors and the Compensation Committee will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding our executive compensation. Unless otherwise instructed, validly executed proxies will be voted “FOR” this resolution. The board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the resolution set forth in Proposal 2. 17 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Summary Compensation Table. The following table shows the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, including Douglas S. Gordon, our principal executive officer, Mark R. Gerke, our chief financial officer, and the four other highest paid executive officers who received total compensation of more than $100,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”). The “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column has been omitted because no listed individual earned any compensation during the listed years of a type required to be disclosed in this column. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE Bonus ($) Stock Awards ($)(1) Option Awards ($)(1) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) Year 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016 Salary ($) 850,000 850,000 825,000 308,654 300,000 291,500 2018 2017 2016 197,308 170,000 165,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 299,600 — — 31,900 2018 132,192 40,000 — 72,800 All Other Compensation ($)(2) 137,899 86,712 67,320 Total ($) 987,899 936,712 892,320 74,343 65,929 78,169 382,997 365,929 369,669 56,949 52,410 48,589 254,257 222,410 545,089 4,162 252,154 — — — — — — — — — — Name and Principal Position Douglas S. Gordon Chief Executive Officer of Waterstone Financial and WaterStone Bank William F. Bruss Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel of Waterstone Financial and WaterStone Bank Mark R. Gerke Chief Financial Officer of Waterstone Financial and WaterStone Bank Julie Glynn Senior Vice President and Director of Retail of WaterStone Bank (3) A.W. Pickel, III President of Waterstone Mortgage Corporation (4) 2018 150,000 75,000 Eric J. Egenhoefer President of Waterstone Mortgage Corporation (5) 2018 2017 2016 243,750 318,270 309,000 11,447 — — — — — — — — — — — 5,712 230,712 — 568,577 853,963 310,659 6,000 6,000 565,856 892,847 1,168,963 ________________________________ (1) Reflects the aggregate grant-date fair value of the stock and option awards granted during the years shown as calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The assumptions used in the valuation of these awards are included in the “Stock Based Compensation” footnote to Waterstone Financial’s audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for such years, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (2) A detailed breakdown of “All Other Compensation” is provided in the table below. (3) Ms. Glynn initiated employment with the Company on March 26, 2018. (4) Mr. Pickel’s employment with the Company was terminated on March 25, 2019. (5) Mr. Egenhoefer resigned from the Company, effective September 15, 2018. 18 All Other Compensation Name and Principal Position Douglas S. Gordon William F. Bruss Mark R. Gerke Julie A. Glynn A.W. Pickel, III (1) Eric J. Egenhoefer (2)(3) 401(k) Match ($) Employee Stock Ownership Plan ($) Automobile Expense Allowance ($)(2) Restricted Stock Dividends ($) Other ($)(1) 663 840 1,896 1,281 5,712 6,044 54,872 54,872 39,369 — — — 6,864 9,571 8,164 2,881 — 4,615 75,500 9,060 7,520 — — — Total ($) 137,899 74,343 56,949 4,162 5,712 — — — — — 300,000 310,659 ________________________________ (1) Mr. Pickel’s employment with the Company was terminated on March 25, 2019. (2) Mr. Egenhoefer was eligible to receive to $300,000 as a severance payment per the employment agreement, effective July 24, 2018. (3) Mr. Egenhoefer resigned from the Company, effective July 27, 2018. Employment Agreements Employment Agreement with Douglas S. Gordon. Effective as of October 21, 2014, WaterStone Bank entered into an employment agreement with Douglas S. Gordon, President and Chief Executive Officer of WaterStone Bank. Commencing on each January 1st (the “Anniversary Date”) thereafter, the term of this Agreement shall renew on each January 1st anniversary date thereafter for an additional year such that the remaining term of this Agreement is always three years, unless written notice of non-renewal is provided to Mr. Gordon at least 30 days prior to such Anniversary Date, in which case the term of this Agreement shall become fixed and shall end two years following such Anniversary Date. Under the agreement, Mr. Gordon’s annual base salary for 2019 is $850,000. In addition, Mr. Gordon is entitled to participate in the employee benefit plans, arrangements and perquisites offered by WaterStone Bank and is entitled to participate in any incentive compensation or bonus plan or arrangement of WaterStone Bank or Waterstone Financial in which he is eligible to participate. The Bank will also pay or reimburse him for business expenses incurred, pay or reimburse him for annual country club dues and furnish him an automobile or reimburse him for the expense of leasing an automobile and for reasonable expenses associated with the use of such automobile. In the event of Mr. Gordon’s involuntary termination of employment for reasons other than cause, disability, death or retirement, or in the event Mr. Gordon resigns during the term of the agreement for “good reason” (as defined in the agreement), subject to his execution and non-revocation of a mutual release of claims, Mr. Gordon will receive a lump-sum severance payment equal to the sum of (i) his earned but unpaid salary as of the date of his termination of employment, (ii) the benefits he is entitled to as a former employee under the employee benefit plans maintained by WaterStone Bank or Waterstone Financial, (iii) the remaining base salary and bonuses Mr. Gordon would have earned if he had continued his employment for the remaining term of the Agreement and had earned a bonus and/or incentive award in each year in an amount equal to the average bonus and/or incentive award earned by him over the three calendar years preceding the year in which the termination occurs, (iv) the annual contributions or payments that would have been made on Mr. Gordon’s behalf to any employee benefit plans of WaterStone Bank or Waterstone Financial as if Mr. Gordon had continued his employment with WaterStone Bank for the remaining term of the Agreement, and (v) the annual payments that would have been made related to membership in a country club and the use of an automobile for the remaining term of the Agreement. In addition, all awards under the Waterstone Financial, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan that would have vested had Mr. Gordon continued his employment with WaterStone Bank for the remaining term of the Agreement will vest as of the date of termination, provided that if the terms of the Incentive Plan do not allow for such vesting, WaterStone Bank will make a lump sum payment to Mr. Gordon in an amount equal to the value to Mr. Gordon if such awards had become vested and, with respect to stock options, been exercised. Upon the occurrence of an event of termination described above, Mr. Gordon will be entitled to continued life insurance coverage and non-taxable medical and dental insurance coverage for the remaining term of the agreement. 19 Upon termination of Mr. Gordon’s employment by Waterstone Financial or WaterStone Bank for reasons other than cause following a change in control of Waterstone Financial or WaterStone Bank, or Mr. Gordon’s resignation due to good reason following a change in control, Mr. Gordon will receive a lump sum payment within 30 days after the date of termination substantially similar to the payment that he would receive on such a termination without regard to a change in control, except that such payments will be for a period of 36 months from date of termination. Mr. Gordon’s payment described in clause (iii) above will be based on the highest annual bonus and/or incentive award earned by him in any of the three calendar years preceding the year in which the termination occurs. Also, the annual contributions or payments that would have been made on Mr. Gordon’s behalf to any employee benefit plans of the Bank or the Company as if Executive had continued his employment with the Bank for a period of 36 months following the Date of Termination, based on contributions or payments made (on an annualized basis) at the Date of Termination and the annual payments that would have been made on Mr. Gordon’s behalf if he had continued his employment with the Bank for a period of 36 months following the Date of Termination. In addition, all awards granted under the Waterstone Financial, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan will vest as of the date of termination. Upon the occurrence of an event of termination described above, Mr. Gordon will be entitled to continued life insurance coverage and non-taxable medical and dental insurance coverage for a period of 36 months from the date of termination. In the event of Mr. Gordon’s disability and subsequent termination of employment, Mr. Gordon will receive the benefits provided under any disability program sponsored by Waterstone Financial or WaterStone Bank. To the extent such benefits are less than Mr. Gordon’s base salary at the date of termination, and less than 66 2/3% of Mr. Gordon’s base salary after the first year following termination, Mr. Gordon will be entitled to the difference between the disability benefits provided under any disability program sponsored by Waterstone Financial or WaterStone Bank and his base salary for a period of one year. After the first year following termination, Mr. Gordon will be entitled to the difference between the disability benefits provided under any disability program sponsored by Waterstone Financial or WaterStone Bank and 66 2/3% of Mr. Gordon’s base salary, through the earliest to occur of the date of Mr. Gordon’s death, recovery from disability or the date Mr. Gordon attains age 65. In the event of Mr. Gordon’s death during the term of the agreement, Mr. Gordon’s beneficiary, legal representatives or estate will be paid Mr. Gordon’s base salary for one year and WaterStone Bank will continue to provide Mr. Gordon’s family the same medical, dental, and other health benefits that were provided by WaterStone Bank to Mr. Gordon’s family immediately prior the Mr. Gordon’s death, on the same terms, including cost, for one year. In the event of termination due to Mr. Gordon’s retirement, no amount or benefit will be due Mr. Gordon under the Agreement. The employment agreement restricts Mr. Gordon from revealing confidential information of Waterstone Financial and WaterStone Bank. In addition, for one year following termination of employment (other than upon termination following a change in control), Mr. Gordon may not compete with Waterstone Financial and WaterStone Bank or solicit or hire WaterStone Bank’s employees. Employment Agreement with A.W. Pickel, III. Effective as of June 19, 2018, Waterstone Mortgage Corporation entered into an employment agreement with its President, A.W. Pickel, III. The agreement had an initial term commencing on December 31, 2021 and renewing on each December 31 thereafter, such that the remaining term of the agreement would always be two years unless written notice of non-renewal was provided to Mr. Pickel at least thirty (30) days prior to such Anniversary Date, in which case the term of the agreement would have become fixed and would have ended one year following such Anniversary Date. Under the agreement, Mr. Pickel was entitled to a base salary in 2019 of $350,000 and participation in company-wide employee benefits, including Waterstone Mortgage Corporation’s 401(k) Plan and other qualified and non-qualified plans that may be maintained by the company. Beginning on January 1, 2019, Mr. Pickel was also entitled to annual bonus compensation pursuant to the bonus formula set forth in the agreement. Under the agreement, Mr. Pickel had the right to terminate his employment for “good reason,” which includes any material breach of the agreement by Waterstone Mortgage Corporation, including the failure, without “good cause” (as defined in the agreement), to pay the amounts due under the agreement on a timely basis. In the event the 20 agreement was terminated for good reason or in the event Waterstone Mortgage Corporation terminated Mr. Pickel’s employment for any reason other than “good cause,” subject to his execution and non-revocation of a release of claims, Mr. Pickel would have been entitled to receive his base salary through the remaining term of the agreement. In the event of termination due to disability, Mr. Pickel would have received any unpaid base salary earned prior to the effective date of termination and reimbursement of expenses to which Mr. Pickel was entitled. In the event of Mr. Pickel’s death during the term of the agreement, the agreement would have terminated with no payment of severance compensation to Mr. Pickel’s estate. Similarly, in the event of his termination for good cause, Mr. Pickel would not have been entitled to any severance compensation. In the event of Mr. Pickel’s termination of employment, the agreement contains provisions which prevent him from soliciting business from customers of Waterstone Mortgage Corporation, withdrawing any customers’ business, hiring any employees, consultants or personnel of Waterstone Mortgage Corporation, disclosing confidential information or competing with Waterstone Mortgage Corporation for one year following termination of employment. Effective March 25, 2019, Mr. Pickel’s employment was terminated with good cause. As such, Mr. Pickel is not entitled to compensation under the terms of the employment agreement. Employment Agreement with Julie Glynn. Effective as of April 17, 2018, WaterStone Bank entered into an employment change in control agreement with Julie Glynn, Senior Vice President and Director of Retail Banking of WaterStone Bank The agreement has a 36 month term from the effective date. The term of this Agreement shall automatically renew for 90 days in the event of a change in control. Under the agreement, Ms. Glynn may terminate her employment for “good reason,” which includes any material breach of the agreement by WaterStone Bank, without “good cause” (as defined in the agreement). In the event that Ms. Glynn resigns for good reason or in the event WaterStone Bank terminates Ms. Glynn’s employment for any reason other than “good cause,” Ms. Glynn will be entitled to receive a cash lump sum equal to one times the highest base salary during the term of the agreement. In the event of Ms. Glynn’s death during the term of the agreement, Ms. Glynn’s beneficiary or estate will received a cash lump sum equal to one times the highest base salary during the term of the agreement. In the event of her termination for good cause, Ms. Glynn will not be entitled to any severance compensation under the agreement. In the event of Ms. Glynn’s termination of employment, the agreement contains provisions which prevent her from being a specified employee of a public company bank for six months after termination. Plan-Based Awards The following table sets forth for the year ended December 31, 2018 certain information as to grants of plan- based awards. For further discussion and details regarding the accounting treatment and underlying assumptions relative to stock-based compensation, see Note 10, “Stock-Based Compensation,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of Waterstone Financial, Inc.’s 2018 Form 10-K. GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 Name Grant Date Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards Maximum Target Threshold ($) ($) ($) All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock (#) All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($) Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) Julie A. Glynn 3/20/2018 — — — — 20,000 17.35 72,800 ______________________ 21 Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End. The following table sets forth information with respect to outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2018. Grants were made under our 2006 and 2015 Equity Incentive Plans. OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT DECEMBER 31, 2018 Option Awards Stock Awards Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable 66,471 18,000 3,292 6,000 4,000 — Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable 60,000 (4) 12,000 (4) — 4,000 (4) 6,000 (4) 20,000 (4) Option Exercise Price ($) 12.75 12.75 1.73 12.75 14.98 17.35 Option Expiration Date 3/4/2025 3/4/2025 1/4/2022 3/4/2025 6/21/2026 3/20/2028 Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) 50,000 (1) 6,000 (1) — — 8,000 (2) — Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3) 838,000 100,560 — — 134,080 — Name Douglas S. Gordon William F. Bruss Mark R. Gerke Julie A. Glynn ______________________ (1) Consists of restricted shares awarded on March 4, 2015 under the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. The restricted shares vest in five increments of 20% each beginning on the March 6, 2015 and subsequently on each anniversary of the initial award. (2) Consists of restricted shares awarded on June 21, 2016 under the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. The restricted shares vest in five increments of 20% each beginning on the June 22, 2016 and subsequently on each anniversary of the initial award. (3) Based on the $16.76 per share closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2018. (4) Options vest in five annual increments of 20% each beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date and subsequently on each anniversary of the date of the initial award. Option Exercises and Stock Vested. The following table sets forth information with respect to option exercises and stock that vested during the year ended December 31, 2018. OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 Option Awards Stock Awards Name Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) 7,843 — — 40,000 Douglas S. Gordon William F. Bruss Mark R. Gerke Eric J. Egenhoefer ________________________________ (1) Based on the $17.70 per share closing price of our common stock on March 6, 2018. (2) Based on the $17.90 per share closing price of our common stock on June 22, 2018. Value Realized on Exercise ($) 38,823 — — 170,042 Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting(#) 50,000 6,000 4,000 — Value Realized on Vesting ($) 885,000 (1) 106,200 (1) 71,600 (2) — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control The following table sets forth estimates of the amounts that would become payable to our Named Executive Officers, under employment agreements and/or equity award agreements in the event of their termination of employment on December 31, 2018, under designated circumstances. The table does not include vested or accrued benefits under any tax-qualified benefit plans that do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of Executive Officers or equity awards or other benefits in which the executive is vested without regard to the change in control. The estimates shown are highly dependent on a variety of factors, including but not limited to the date of termination, interest rates, federal, state, and local tax rates, and compensation history. Actual payments due could vary substantially from the estimates shown. We consider each termination scenario listed below to be exclusive of all other scenarios and do not expect that any of our Executive Officers would be eligible to collect the benefits shown under more than one termination scenario. If a Named Executive Officer is terminated for “cause” as defined in the applicable agreement or award, we have no contractual payment or other obligations under the agreement. 22 $ $ — — — — — $ 600,000 (1) — — — 600,000 $ $ 185,000 (3) $ — — 600,000 (3) — — — 600,000 — — — — — — $ $ $ POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL Mr. Gordon Mr. Bruss Mr. Gerke Ms. Glynn Mr. Pickel (8) Discharge Without Cause or Resignation With Good Reason — no Change in Control Severance payment Medical, dental and life insurance benefits Acceleration of vesting of stock options Acceleration of vesting of restricted stock Total Discharge Without Cause or Resignation With Good Reason — Change in Control Related Severance payment (lump sum) Medical, dental and life insurance benefits Acceleration of vesting of stock options Acceleration of vesting of $ 3,719,532 (1) 35,947 (2) $ 240,600 (4) 956,500 (5) $ 4,952,579 $ $ 5,945,698 (3) 53,921 (2) $ — — — — — — — $ $ $ — — — — — — — 240,600 (4) 48,120 (4) 26,720 (4) restricted stock Total 956,500 (5) $ 7,196,719 $ 114,780 (5) 162,900 151,040 (5) $ 177,760 — $ 185,000 Disability Severance/disability payment Acceleration of vesting of stock option Acceleration of vesting of restricted stock Total Death Salary continuation payment Medical, dental and life insurance benefits Acceleration of vesting of stock options Acceleration of vesting of $ 2,550,000 (6) $ — $ — $ — 240,600 (4) 48,120 (4) 26,720 (4) — 114,780 (5) 162,900 151,040 (5) $ 177,760 $ — — 956,500 (5) $ 5,359,667 $ 850,000 (7) 17,974 (7) $ $ — — $ — — $ 185,000 (7) $ — 240,600 (4) 48,120 (4) 26,720 (4) — — restricted stock Total 956,500 (5) $ 2,065,074 $ 114,780 (5) 162,900 151,040 (5) $ 177,760 — $ 185,000 $ — — _____________________________ (1) The cash severance payment under Mr. Gordon’s employment agreement equals (i) the remaining base salary and employee benefits to which he is entitled under his employment agreement over the remaining term of the agreement, assuming he had earned a bonus equal to the average bonus or incentive award earned over the three calendar years preceding the year of termination, as determined under the agreement; (ii) the annual contributions that would have been made on Mr. Gordon’s behalf under any employee benefit plans in which he participated; and (iii) the annual payments towards automobile lease and expenses that he would be entitled to for the remaining term of the agreement. The severance payment under Mr. Pickel’s employment agreement is equal to the remaining base salary to which he is entitled under his employment agreement over the remaining term of the agreement. (2) Mr. Gordon will be entitled to non-taxable medical and dental coverage and life insurance coverage for the remaining term of the agreement, in the event of a termination without cause or for good reason not related to a change in control. In the event of an involuntary termination without cause or for good reason following a change in control, Mr. Gordon will be entitled to the continuation of the same benefits for a period of 36 months from the date of termination. (3) For Mr. Gordon, the cash severance benefit payable on an involuntary termination of employment or termination for good reason in connection with a change in control is the same as the payment in such a termination that occurs without regard to a change in control, except that such payments would be calculated utilizing the highest bonus or incentive award earned over the three calendar years preceding the year of termination and would be based on a 36-month term. For Mr. Pickel, the severance payment under his employment agreement is equal to the remaining base salary to which he is entitled under his employment agreement over the remaining term of the agreement. For Ms. Glynn, the severance payment under her employment agreement is equal to one times the highest base salary paid to Ms. Glynn during the term of the agreement. (4) Value is based on the closing price of $16.76 on December 31, 2018 of Waterstone Financial, Inc. common stock less the exercise price of the stock option. As of December 31, 2018, the closing price exceeds the exercise price of Ms. Glynn’s options. (5) Based on the closing price of $16.76 on December 31, 2018 of Waterstone Financial, Inc. common stock. This includes the value of unvested restricted stock and any accrued dividends on those shares. 23 (6) (7) In the event of Mr. Gordon’s disability, to the extent that any disability benefits payable under a disability program sponsored by the Bank is less than his base salary during the first year after termination or less than 66-2/3% of his base salary after the first year of his termination, Mr. Gordon will receive a supplement to such disability benefit under the employment agreement to ensure that his aggregate disability benefit is equal to his base salary during the first year and equal to 66-2/3% of his base salary after the first year of his disability. (This benefit can be provided under a supplemental disability policy providing such benefit, in lieu of providing it under the employment agreement.) In the event of Mr. Gordon’s death, Mr. Gordon’s estate, legal representatives or named beneficiary or beneficiaries a base salary for the remaining year along with the same medical, dental, and other health benefits that that would have been made available to Mr. Gordon’s family. In the event of Ms. Glynn’s death, her beneficiary or estate, will receive a cash lump sum payment equal to one times Officer’s highest rate of Base Salary during the term of this Agreement. (8) Effective March 25, 2019, Mr. Pickel’s employment was terminated with good cause. As such, Mr. Pickel is not entitled to compensation under the terms of the employment agreement. CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information: For 2018: • The median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than our Chief Executive Officer), was $57,573; and • The annual total compensation of Mr. Gordon, our President and Chief Executive Officer was $987,899. Based on information, the ratio for 2018 of the annual total compensation of our President and Chief Executive Officer to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees is 17.2 to 1. We completed the following steps to identify the median employee: • As of December 31 2018, our employee population consisted of approximately 895 employees, including any full- time, part-time, temporary, or seasonal employees employed on that date. • To find the median of the annual total compensation of our employees (other than our CEO), we used wages from our payroll records as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2 for fiscal 2018. In making this determination, we annualized compensation for full-time and part-time permanent employees who were employed on December 31, 2018, but did not work for us the entire year. No full-time equivalent adjustments were made for part-time employees. • We identified our median employee using this compensation measure and methodology, which was consistently applied to all our employees included in the calculation. Director Compensation Set forth below is summary compensation for each of our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2018. Compensation includes an annual retainer as well as chairmanship and committee fees. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 Name Ellen S. Bartel Nominating Committee Co-chairman Thomas E. Dalum Compensation Committee Chairman Michael L. Hansen Audit Committee Chairman Patrick S. Lawton Chairman of the Board Kristine A. Rappé Executive Committee Chairman Stephen J. Schmidt Nominating Committee Co-chairman Fees earned or paid in cash ($) 18,000 Total ($) 18,000 18,000 24,000 30,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 24,000 30,000 18,000 18,000 In 2018, we paid each non-officer director annual meeting fees of $18,000. Additional annual fees paid to the Chairman of the Board totaled $12,000 and additional annual fees paid to the Chairman of the Audit Committee totaled $6,000. 24 As of December 31, 2018, Mr. Lawton had 20,000 unvested shares of restricted stock, Mr. Hansen had 16,000 unvested shares of restricted stock, and Bartel, Dalum, Rappe, and Schmidt had 14,000 unvested shares of restricted stock, respectively. Bartel, Dalum, Hansen, Lawton, Rappe, and Schmidt had 37,500 vested but unexercised stock options and 62,500 unvested stock options, respectively. SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Under the federal securities laws, Waterstone Financial directors, its officers and any person holding more than 10% of the common stock are required to report their initial ownership of the common stock and any change in that ownership to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Specific due dates for these reports have been established and we are required to disclose in this Proxy Statement any failure to file such reports by these dates during the last year. Based solely on our review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 during or for the year ended December 31, 2018, we believe that all required reports were filed by such persons on a timely basis during the last fiscal year. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION None of the members of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of Waterstone Financial, WaterStone Bank or any subsidiary, nor did any of them have any other reportable interlock. TRANSACTIONS WITH CERTAIN RELATED PERSONS WaterStone Bank has had, and expects to continue to have, regular business dealings with its officers and directors, as well as their associates and the firms which they serve. Our historical policy has been that transactions with our directors and executive officers be on terms that are no more beneficial to the director or executive officer than we would provide to unaffiliated third parties. Under our policies and procedures, all of our transactions with officers and directors require review, approval or ratification by the board of directors. Directors and executive officers, and their associates, regularly deposit funds with WaterStone Bank. The deposits are made on the same terms and conditions which are offered to other depositors. In the ordinary course of business, WaterStone Bank makes loans available to its directors, officers and employees. After six months of continuous employment, full-time employees of WaterStone Bank were entitled to receive a mortgage loan at a reduced interest rate, consistent with applicable laws and regulations. In December 2005, the board discontinued the employee loan program for employee loans originated after March 31, 2006. Employee loans at reduced interest rates originated on or before March 31, 2006 continue on their same terms. The table below lists the executive officers who participated in the employee mortgage loan program during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and certain information with respect to their loans. There were no directors or executive officers who had an employee mortgage loan program loan outstanding at December 31, 2018 or 2017. No directors or other executive officers of Waterstone Financial participated in the employee mortgage loan program during the year ended December 31, 2018. Largest Aggregate Balance 1/01/17 to 12/31/17 TRANSACTIONS WITH CERTAIN RELATED PERSONS Non- employee Interest Rate Principal Balance 12/31/17 Interest Rate Principal Paid 1/01/17 to 12/31/17 Interest Paid 1/01/17 to 12/31/17 Name Mark R. Gerke $ 198,901 1.19% 5.50% $ — $ 198,901 $ 2,169 Name Largest Aggregate Balance 1/01/16 to 12/31/16 Interest Rate Non- employee Interest Rate Principal Balance 12/31/16 Principal Paid 1/01/16 to 12/31/16 Interest Paid 1/01/16 to 12/31/16 Mark R. Gerke $ 210,967 1.72% 5.50% $ 198,901 $ 11,883 $ 3,533 At the time of termination of employment with WaterStone Bank, the interest rate would have been adjusted to the non-employee interest rate as set forth in the mortgage note. 25 These loans neither involve more than the normal risk of collection nor present other unfavorable features. Federal regulations permit executive officers and directors to participate in loan programs that are available to other employees, as long as the director or executive officer is not given preferential treatment compared to other participating employees. Loans made to directors or executive officers, including any modification of such loans, must be approved by a majority of disinterested members of the board of directors. The interest rate on loans to directors and officers is the same as that offered to other employees. Other than described above, and except for loans to directors made in the ordinary course of business that were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to WaterStone Bank and for which management believes neither involve more than the normal risk of collection nor present other unfavorable features, since January 1, 2018, the beginning of our last fiscal year, we and our subsidiaries have not had any transaction or series of transactions, or business relationships, nor are any such transactions or relationships proposed, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which our directors, executive officers or 5% or more shareholders have a direct or indirect material interest. REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE The Audit Committee of the Waterstone Financial board of directors was created in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(a) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee’s functions include meeting with our independent registered public accounting firm and making recommendations to the board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm; assessing the adequacy of internal controls, accounting methods and procedures; review of public disclosures required for compliance with securities laws; and consideration and review of various other matters relating to the our financial accounting and reporting. No member of the Audit Committee is employed by or has any other material relationship with us other than as a customer or shareholder. The members are “independent” as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ listing standards. The board of directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee which can be found on our website. In connection with its function to oversee and monitor our financial reporting process, the Audit Committee has done the following: • • • reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 with management; discussed with RSM US LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, those matters which are required to be discussed under Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard No. 1301; and received the written disclosures and the letter from RSM US LLP required by PCAOB and has discussed with RSM US LLP its independence. The Audit Committee: Michael L. Hansen, Chairman Ellen S. Bartel Thomas E. Dalum Kristine A. Rappé The information contained in the above report will not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC, nor will this information be incorporated into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates such report by reference. Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee recommended to the board that those audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. In addition, the Audit Committee also considered the fees paid to RSM US LLP for services provided by RSM US LLP during the year ended December 31, 2018. 26 PROPOSAL 3 – RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The firm of RSM US LLP has audited the books and records of Waterstone Financial as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 and has served as Waterstone Financial’s principal independent accountant since June 3, 2014. Representatives of RSM US LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if they so desire. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected RSM US LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 We are submitting the selection of independent registered public accountants for shareholder ratification at the annual meeting. Although not required by the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, the Company has determined to ask shareholders to ratify this selection as a matter of good corporate practice. If the appointment of RSM US LLP is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider the shareholders’ vote when determining whether to continue the firm’s engagement, but may ultimately determine to continue the engagement of the firm or another audit firm without re-submitting the matter to shareholders. Even if the appointment of RSM US LLP is ratified, the Audit Committee may in its sole discretion terminate the engagement of the firm and direct the appointment of another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such an appointment would be in the best interests of our Company and our shareholders. As reflected in the tables below, Waterstone Financial incurred fees in fiscal years 2018 and 2017 for professional services provided by RSM US LLP related to those periods. Year Ended December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 $ 295,125 $ 272,580 $ 21,000 $ - Audit fees (1)……………… Audit-related fees (2)……… _____________________ (1) Audit fees consist of professional services rendered for the audit of our financial statements and review of our Forms 10-Q. (2) Audit-related fees consist of professional services incurred related to a regulatory compliance audit. 27 Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The Audit Committee has delegated pre- approval authority to its Chairman when expedition of services is necessary. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the full Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. All audit services for the past two fiscal years were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOTICES Shareholder proposals must be received by the Secretary of Waterstone Financial, William F. Bruss, no later than December 4, 2019 in order to be considered for inclusion in next year’s annual meeting proxy materials pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 14a-8. Under Securities and Exchange Commission rules relating to the discretionary voting of proxies at shareholder meetings, if a proponent of a matter for shareholder consideration (other than a shareholder proposal) fails to notify Waterstone Financial at least 45 days prior to the month and day of mailing the prior year’s Proxy Statement, then management proxies are allowed to use their discretionary voting authority if a proposal is raised at the annual meeting, without any discussion of the matter in the Proxy Statement. Therefore, any such matters must be received by February 18, 2020 in the case of the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders. Waterstone Financial is not aware of any such proposals for the 2019 annual meeting. Our Bylaws provide an advance notice procedure for certain business, or nominations to the board of directors, to be brought before an annual meeting of shareholders. In order for a stockholder to properly bring business before an annual meeting, or to propose a nominee to the board of directors, our Secretary must receive written notice not earlier than the 90th day nor later than the 80th day prior to date of the annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that less than 90 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting is provided to shareholders, then, to be timely, notice by the stockholder must be so received not later than the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. The notice with respect to stockholder proposals that are not nominations for director must set forth as to each matter such stockholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting: (i) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting; (ii) the name and address of such stockholder as they appear on our books and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made; (iii) the class or series and number of shares of our capital stock which are owned beneficially or of record by such stockholder and such beneficial owner; (iv) a description of all arrangements or understandings between such stockholder and any other person or persons (including their names) in connection with the proposal of such business by such stockholder and any material interest of such stockholder in such business; and (v) a representation that such stockholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the annual meeting to bring such business before the meeting. The notice with respect to director nominations must include (i) as to each individual whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director, (A) all information relating to such person that would indicate such person’s qualification under Article 2, Section 12 of our Bylaws, including an affidavit that such person would not be disqualified under the provisions of Article 2, Section 12 of the Bylaws and (B) all other information relating to such individual that is required to be disclosed in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any successor rule or regulation; and (ii) as to the stockholder giving the notice, (A) the name and address of such stockholder as they appear on our books and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made; (B) the class or series and number of shares of our capital stock which are owned beneficially or of record by such stockholder and such beneficial owner; (C) a description of all arrangements or understandings between such 28 stockholder and each proposed nominee and any other person or persons (including their names) pursuant to which the nomination(s) are to be made by such stockholder; (D) a representation that such stockholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the persons named in its notice; and (E) any other information relating to such stockholder that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any successor rule or regulation. Such notice must be accompanied by a written consent of each proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. The date on which the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders is expected to be held is May 19, 2020. Assuming the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders is held on May 19, 2020, advance written notice for certain business, or nominations to the Board of Directors, to be brought before the next annual meeting must be given to us no earlier than February 19, 2020 and no later than April 29, 2020. If notice is received before February 19, 2020 or after April 29, 2020, it will be considered untimely, and we will not be required to present the matter at the shareholders meeting. By Order of the Board of Directors William F. Bruss Executive Vice President and Secretary Wauwatosa, Wisconsin April 11, 2019 We will provide a copy of the Waterstone Financial Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2018 (without exhibits) without charge to any record or beneficial owner of our common stock on the written request of that person directed to: Mark R. Gerke, Chief Financial Officer, Waterstone Financial, Inc., 11200 W. Plank Ct., Wauwatosa, WI 53226. The 10-K provides a list of exhibits, which will be provided for a reasonable fee to reflect duplication and mailing costs; exhibits are also available through the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. 29 [This page has been intentionally left blank.] SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549F O R M 1 0 - K[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018Commission file number: 001-36271WATERSTONE FINANCIAL, INC.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)Maryland 90-1026709(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 11200 W Plank Ct, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)(414) 761-1000Registrant's telephone number, including area code:Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC(Title of class) (Name of each exchange on which registered)Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:NONEIndicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the 1933 Act).Yes ☐ No ☒Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the 1934 Act.Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past90 days.Yes ☒ No ☐Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-Tduring the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files)Yes ☒ No ☐Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best ofregistrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growthcompany. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the ExchangeAct.Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☒ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller Reporting Company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revisedfinancial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act).Yes ☐ No ☒The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the price at which thecommon equity was last sold on June 30, 2018 as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market®, was approximately $499.9 million.As of February 28, 2019 28,088,739 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock were issued and outstanding.DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Part of Form 10-K Into WhichDocument Portions of Document are IncorporatedProxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Part IIIShareholders on May 21, 2019 WATERSTONE FINANCIAL, INC.FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONFOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE PART I 1.Business 3 - 271A.Risk Factors 28 - 351B.Unresolved Staff Comments 352.Properties 353.Legal Proceedings 364.Mine Safety Disclosures 36 PART II 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholders Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 376.Selected Financial Data 38 - 397.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 40 - 547A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 558.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 56 - 999.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 999A.Controls and Procedures 99 - 1009B.Other Information 101 PART III 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 10111.Executive Compensation 10112.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 10113.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 10214.Principal Accountant Fees and Services 102 PART IV 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 102 Signatures 10316.Form 10-K Summary 103 - 2 -PART 1Item 1. BusinessForward-Looking StatementsThis Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain or incorporate by reference various forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of wordssuch as “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “seek,” “expect” and similar expressions and verbs in the future tense. These forward-lookingstatements include, but are not limited to:• Statements of our goals, intentions and expectations;• Statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies;• Statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolio;• Estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.These forward-looking statements are based on current beliefs and expectations of our management and are inherently subject to significant business,economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject toassumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change.The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements.• general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market area, including employment prospects, that are different than expected;• competition among depository and other financial institutions;• inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins and yields, our mortgage banking revenues or reduce the fair value offinancial instruments or reduce the origination levels in our lending business, or increase the level of defaults, losses or prepayments on loans wehave made and make whether held in portfolio or sold in the secondary markets;• adverse changes in the securities or secondary mortgage markets;• changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements;• changes in monetary or fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board;• our ability to manage market risk, credit risk and operational risk in the current economic conditions;• our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities;• our ability to successfully integrate acquired entities;• decreased demand for our products and services;• changes in tax policies or assessment policies;• the inability of third-party provider to perform their obligations to us;• changes in consumer demand, spending, borrowing and savings habits;• changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, theSecurities and Exchange Commission or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;• our ability to retain key employees;• cyber attacks, computer viruses and other technological risks that may breach the security of our websites or other systems to obtain unauthorizedaccess to confidential information and destroy data or disable our systems;• technological changes that may be more difficult or expensive than expected;• the ability of third-party providers to perform their obligations to us;• the effects of federal government shutdown;• the ability of the U.S. Government to manage federal debt limits;• significant increases in our loan losses; and• changes in the financial condition, results of operations or future prospects of issuers of securities that we own.See also the factors regarding future operations discussed in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"and "Risk Factors" below.Waterstone Financial, Inc.Waterstone Financial, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“New Waterstone”), was organized in 2013. Upon completion of the mutual-to-stock conversion ofLamplighter Financial, MHC in 2014, New Waterstone became the holding company of WaterStone Bank SSB and succeeded to all of the business and operations ofWaterstone Financial, Inc., a Federal corporation (“Waterstone-Federal”) and each of Waterstone-Federal and Lamplighter Financial, MHC ceased to exist. In thisreport, we refer to WaterStone Bank SSB, our wholly owned subsidiary, both before and after the reorganization, as “WaterStone Bank” or the “Bank.”New Waterstone did not engage in any business prior to the completion of the mutual-to-stock conversion of Lamplighter Financial, MHC on January 22,2014. Consequently, this Annual Report on Form 10-K reflects the financial condition and operating results of Waterstone-Federal and its subsidiaries, including theBank, until January 22, 2014, and of New Waterstone, and its subsidiaries, including the Bank, thereafter. The words “Waterstone Financial,” “we” and “our” thus areintended to refer to Waterstone-Federal and its subsidiaries with respect to matters and time periods occurring on or before January 22, 2014, and to New Waterstoneand its subsidiaries with respect to matters and time periods occurring thereafter.- 3 -Waterstone Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including WaterStone Bank, are referred to herein as the “Company,” “Waterstone Financial,” or “we.”The Company maintains a website at www.wsbonline.com. We make available through that website, free of charge, copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, amendments to those reports and proxy materials as soon as is reasonably practical after theCompany electronically files those materials with, or furnishes them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may access those reports by following the linksunder “Investor Relations” at the Company’s website. Information on this website is not and should not be considered a part of this document.Waterstone Financial’s executive offices are located at 11200 West Plank Court, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226, and its telephone number at this address is(414) 761-1000.BUSINESS OF WATERSTONE BANKGeneralWaterStone Bank is a community bank that has served the banking needs of its customers since 1921. WaterStone Bank also has an active mortgage bankingsubsidiary, Waterstone Mortgage Corporation, which had 78 offices in 23 states as of December 31, 2018.WaterStone Bank conducts its community banking business from 11 banking offices located in Milwaukee, Washington and Waukesha counties, Wisconsin,as well as a loan production office in Minneapolis, Minnesota. WaterStone Bank’s principal lending activity is originating one- to four-family, multi-family residential,and commercial real estate loans for retention in its portfolio. At December 31, 2018, such loans comprised 35.5%, 43.3%, and 16.4%, respectively, of WaterStoneBank’s loan portfolio. WaterStone Bank also offers home equity loans and lines of credit, construction and land loans, commercial business loans, and consumerloans. WaterStone Bank funds its loan production primarily with retail deposits and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Our deposit offerings include certificates ofdeposit, money market savings accounts, transaction deposit accounts, non-interest bearing demand accounts and individual retirement accounts. Our investmentsecurities portfolio is comprised principally of mortgage-backed securities, government-sponsored enterprise bonds, municipal obligations, and other debt securities.WaterStone Bank is subject to comprehensive regulation and examination by the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions (the "WDFI") and theFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC").WaterStone Bank’s executive offices are located at 11200 West Plank Court, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226, and its telephone number is (414) 761-1000. Itswebsite address is www.wsbonline.com. Information on this website is not and should not be considered a part of this document.WaterStone Bank’s mortgage banking operations are conducted through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Waterstone Mortgage Corporation. WaterstoneMortgage Corporation originates single-family residential real estate loans for sale into the secondary market. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation utilizes lines ofcredit provided by WaterStone Bank as a primary source of funds, and also utilizes a line of credit with another financial institution as needed. On a consolidatedbasis, Waterstone Mortgage Corporation originated approximately $2.51 billion in mortgage loans held for sale during the year ended December 31, 2018, whichexcludes the loans originated from Waterstone Mortgage Corporation and purchased by WaterStone Bank.Subsidiary ActivitiesWaterstone Financial currently has one wholly-owned subsidiary, WaterStone Bank, which in turn has three wholly-owned subsidiaries. WauwatosaInvestments, Inc., which holds and manages our investment portfolio, is located and incorporated in Nevada. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation is a mortgagebanking business incorporated in Wisconsin. Main Street Real Estate Holdings, LLC is an inactive Wisconsin limited liability corporation and previously ownedWaterStone Bank office facilities and held WaterStone Bank office facility leases.Wauwatosa Investments, Inc. Established in 1998, Wauwatosa Investments, Inc. operates in Nevada as WaterStone Bank’s investment subsidiary. Thiswholly-owned subsidiary owns and manages the majority of the consolidated investment portfolio. It has its own board of directors currently comprised of itsPresident, the WaterStone Bank Chief Financial Officer, Treasury Officer and the Chairman of Waterstone Financial’s board of directors.Waterstone Mortgage Corporation. Acquired in February 2006, Waterstone Mortgage Corporation is a mortgage banking business with offices in 23states. It has its own board of directors currently comprised of its President, its Chief Financial Officer, the WaterStone Bank Chief Executive Officer, Chief FinancialOfficer and Executive Vice President and General Counsel.Main Street Real Estate Holdings, LLC. Established in 2002, Main Street Real Estate Holdings, LLC was established to acquire and hold WaterStone Bankoffice and retail facilities, both owned and leased. Main Street Real Estate Holdings, LLC currently conducts real estate broker activities limited to real estate owned.Market AreaWaterStone Bank. WaterStone Bank’s market area is broadly defined as the Milwaukee, Wisconsin metropolitan market, which is geographically located inthe southeast corner of the state. WaterStone Bank’s primary market area is Milwaukee and Waukesha counties and the five surrounding counties of Ozaukee,Washington, Jefferson, Walworth and Racine. We have six branch offices in Milwaukee County, four branch offices in Waukesha County and one branch office inWashington County. At June 30, 2018 (the latest date for which information was publicly available), 45.6% of deposits in the State of Wisconsin were located in theseven-county Milwaukee metropolitan market and 39.8% of deposits in the State of Wisconsin were located in the three counties in which the Bank has a branchoffice.- 4 -WaterStone Bank’s primary market area for deposits includes the communities in which we maintain our banking office locations. Our primary lending marketarea is broader than our primary deposit market area and includes all of the primary market area noted above but extends further west to the Madison, Wisconsinmarket and further north to the Appleton and Green Bay, Wisconsin markets. Additionally, in 2013 we opened a loan production office in Minneapolis, Minnesota,which has a primary lending market area of the Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota metropolitan market.Waterstone Mortgage Corporation. As of December 31, 2018, Waterstone Mortgage Corporation had 11 offices in each of Wisconsin and Florida, eightoffices in each of Pennsylvania and New Mexico, six offices in Minnesota, four offices in Ohio and Texas, three offices in Michigan, two offices in each of Arizona,California, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, New Hampshire, Oregon, and Virginia, and one office in each of Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Nebraska, North Carolina andOklahoma.CompetitionWaterStone Bank. WaterStone Bank faces competition within our market area both in making real estate loans and attracting deposits. The Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis metropolitan statistical area has a high concentration of financial institutions, including large commercial banks, community banks and creditunions. As of June 30, 2018, based on the FDIC annual Summary of Deposits Report, we had the ninth largest market share in our metropolitan statistical area out of 47financial institutions, representing 1.69% of all deposits.Our competition for loans and deposits comes principally from commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking firms and credit unions. We faceadditional competition for deposits from money market funds, brokerage firms, and mutual funds. Some of our competitors offer products and services that we do notoffer, such as trust services and private banking.Our primary focus is to build and develop profitable consumer and commercial customer relationships while maintaining our role as a community bank.Waterstone Mortgage Corporation. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation faces competition for originating loans both directly within the markets in which itoperates and from entities that provide services throughout the United States through internet services. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation’s competition comesprincipally from other mortgage banking firms, as well as from commercial banks, savings institutions and credit unions.Lending Activities The scope of the discussion included under “Lending Activities” is limited to lending operations related to loans originated for investment. A discussion ofthe lending activities related to loans originated for sale is included under “Mortgage Banking Activities.” Historically, our principal lending activity has been originating mortgage loans for the purchase or refinancing of residential and commercial real estate.Generally, we retain the loans that we originate, which we refer to as loans originated for investment. One- to four-family residential mortgage loans represented $490.0million, or 35.5%, of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2018. Multi-family residential mortgage loans represented $597.1 million, or 43.3%, of our total loanportfolio at December 31, 2018. Commercial real estate loans represented $225.5 million, or 16.4%, of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2018. We also offerconstruction and land loans, home equity lines of credit and commercial loans. At December 31, 2018, commercial business loans, home equity loans, and land andconstruction loans totaled $32.8 million, $20.0 million and $13.4 million, respectively.The largest exposure to one borrower or group of related borrowers was $41.0 million in the multi-family category. The borrower represented a total of 3.0%of the total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2018.Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio in dollar amounts and as a percentage of the total portfolioat the dates indicated. At December 31, 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent (Dollars in Thousands) Mortgage loans: Residential real estate: One- to four-family $489,979 35.53% $439,597 34.03% $392,817 33.35% $381,992 34.26% $411,979 37.62%Multi-family 597,087 43.29% 578,440 44.77% 558,592 47.42% 547,250 49.08% 522,281 47.70%Home equity 19,956 1.45% 21,124 1.64% 21,778 1.85% 24,326 2.18% 29,207 2.67%Construction and land 13,361 0.97% 19,859 1.54% 18,179 1.54% 19,148 1.72% 17,081 1.56%Commercial real estate 225,522 16.35% 195,842 15.16% 159,401 13.53% 118,820 10.66% 94,771 8.65%Commercial loans 32,810 2.38% 36,697 2.84% 26,798 2.28% 23,037 2.07% 19,471 1.78%Consumer 433 0.03% 255 0.02% 319 0.03% 361 0.03% 200 0.02% Total loans 1,379,148 100.00% 1,291,814 100.00% 1,177,884 100.00% 1,114,934 100.00% 1,094,990 100.00% Allowance for loanlosses (13,249) (14,077) (16,029) (16,185) (18,706) Loans, net $1,365,899 $1,277,737 $1,161,855 $1,098,749 $1,076,284 - 5 -Loan Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The following table summarizes the final maturities of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2018. Maturities are basedupon the final contractual payment dates and do not reflect the impact of prepayments and scheduled monthly payments that will occur. One- to four-family Multi-family Home Equity Construction and Land Due during the year ended Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted December 31, Amount AverageRate Amount AverageRate Amount AverageRate Amount AverageRate (Dollars in Thousands) 2019 $7,928 5.59% $22,079 4.46% $2,239 5.62% $1,589 5.07%2020 3,715 4.79% 48,593 4.17% 2,467 5.73% 128 4.75%2021 9,239 5.23% 47,828 4.27% 2,392 5.75% 1,597 4.90%2022 25,523 5.25% 89,274 4.45% 3,181 5.48% 59 6.00%2023 18,565 5.41% 97,385 4.64% 3,230 5.45% 1,463 4.76%2024 and thereafter 425,009 4.59% 291,928 4.39% 6,447 4.92% 8,525 4.52%Total $489,979 4.68% $597,087 4.42% $19,956 5.38% $13,361 4.67% Commercial Real Estate Commercial Consumer Total Due during the year ended Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted December 31, Amount AverageRate Amount AverageRate Amount AverageRate Amount AverageRate (Dollars in Thousands) 2019 $18,897 4.88% $10,145 5.60% $205 8.51% $63,082 4.98%2020 14,936 4.36% 6,285 5.07% 28 4.00% 76,152 4.37%2021 20,615 4.21% 2,413 4.36% 56 5.13% 84,140 4.42%2022 32,758 4.30% 4,883 4.37% 17 5.00% 155,695 4.57%2023 32,646 4.67% 2,416 5.07% 127 5.00% 155,832 4.76%2024 and thereafter 105,670 4.34% 6,668 6.69% - 0.00% 844,247 4.51%Total $225,522 4.42% $32,810 5.41% $433 6.61% $1,379,148 4.55%The following table sets forth the scheduled repayments of fixed and adjustable rate loans at December 31, 2018 that are contractually due after December31, 2019. Due After December 31, 2019 Fixed Adjustable Total (In Thousands) Mortgage loans Real estate loans: One- to four-family $18,335 $463,716 $482,051 Multi-family 233,389 341,619 575,008 Home equity 4,786 12,931 17,717 Construction and land 10,561 1,211 11,772 Commercial 117,363 89,262 206,625 Commercial 18,504 4,161 22,665 Consumer 228 - 228 Total loans $403,166 $912,900 $1,316,066 One- to Four-Family Residential Mortgage Loans. One- to four-family residential mortgage loans totaled $490.0 million, or 35.5% of total loans atDecember 31, 2018. One- to four-family residential mortgage loans originated for investment during the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $126.6 million, or 32.9%of all loans originated for investment. Our one- to four-family residential mortgage loans have fixed or adjustable rates. Our single family adjustable-rate mortgageloans generally provide for maximum annual rate adjustments of 200 basis points, with a lifetime maximum adjustment of 600 basis points. Our adjustable-ratemortgage loans typically amortize over terms of up to 30 years, and are indexed to the 12-month LIBOR rate. Single family adjustable rate mortgage loans areoriginated at both our community banking segment and our mortgage banking segment. We do not and have never offered residential mortgage loans specificallydesigned for borrowers with sub-prime credit scores, including Alt-A and negative amortization loans. Further, prior to 2007, we did not offer indexed, adjustable-rateloans other than home equity lines of credit, and we have never offered “teaser rate” first mortgage products.Adjustable rate mortgage loans can decrease the interest rate risk associated with changes in market interest rates by periodically repricing, but involveother risks because, as interest rates increase, the loan payments by the borrower increase, thus increasing the potential for default by the borrower. At the same time,the marketability of the underlying collateral may be adversely affected by higher interest rates. Upward adjustment of the contractual interest rate is also limited bythe maximum periodic and lifetime interest rate adjustments permitted by our loan documents and, therefore, the effectiveness of adjustable rate mortgage loans indecreasing the risk associated with changes in interest rates may be limited during periods of rapidly rising interest rates. Moreover, during periods of rapidlydeclining interest rates the interest income received from the adjustable rate loans can be significantly reduced, thereby adversely affecting interest income.- 6 -All residential mortgage loans that we originate include “due-on-sale” clauses, which give us the right to declare a loan immediately due and payable in theevent that, among other things, the borrower sells or otherwise transfers the real property subject to the mortgage and the loan is not repaid. We also requirehomeowner’s insurance and where circumstances warrant, flood insurance, on properties securing real estate loans. The average one- to four-family first mortgageloan balance was $219,000 on December 31, 2018, and the largest outstanding balance on that date was $5.2 million, which is a consolidation loan that is collateralizedby 80 single family properties. A total of 58.8% of our one- to four-family loans are collateralized by properties in the state of Wisconsin.Multi-family Real Estate Loans. Multi-family loans totaled $597.1 million, or 43.3% of total loans at December 31, 2018. Multi-family loans originated forinvestment during the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $123.1 million, or 32.0% of all loans originated for investment. These loans are generally secured byproperties located in our primary market area. Our multi-family real estate underwriting policies generally provide that such real estate loans may be made in amountsof up to 80% of the appraised value of the property provided the loan complies with our current loans-to-one borrower limit. Multi-family real estate loans are offeredwith interest rates that are fixed for periods of up to five years or are variable and either adjust based on a market index or at our discretion. Contractual maturities donot exceed 10 years while principal and interest payments are typically based on a 30-year amortization period. In reaching a decision whether to make a multi-familyreal estate loan, we consider gross revenues and the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s expertise and credit history, global cash flows, and theappraised value of the underlying property. We will also consider the terms and conditions of the leases and the credit quality of the tenants. We generally require thatthe properties securing these real estate loans have debt service coverage ratios (the ratio of earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortizationdivided by interest expense and current maturities of long term debt) of at least 1.15 times. Generally, multi-family loans made to corporations, partnerships and otherbusiness entities require personal guarantees from the principals and by the owners of 20% or more of the borrower.A multi-family borrower’s financial information is monitored on an ongoing basis by requiring periodic financial statement updates, payment history reviewsand periodic face-to-face meetings with the borrower. We generally require borrowers with aggregate outstanding balances exceeding $1.0 million to provide updatedfinancial statements and federal tax returns annually. These requirements also apply to all guarantors on these loans. We also require borrowers with rentalinvestment property to provide an annual report of income and expenses for the property, including a tenant list and copies of leases, as applicable. The averageoutstanding multi-family mortgage loan balance was $966,000 on December 31, 2018, with the largest outstanding balance at $13.4 million.Loans secured by multi-family real estate generally involve larger principal amounts than owner-occupied, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans.Because payments on loans secured by multi-family properties often depend on the successful operation or management of the properties, repayment of such loansmay be affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy.Home Equity Loans and Lines of Credit. We also offer home equity loans and home equity lines of credit, both of which are secured by owner-occupiedand non-owner occupied one- to four-family residences. At December 31, 2018, outstanding home equity loans and equity lines of credit totaled $20.0 million, or 1.5%of total loans outstanding. At December 31, 2018, the unadvanced portion of home equity lines of credit totaled $14.9 million. Home equity loans and lines originatedfor investment during the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $4.6 million, or 1.2% of all loans originated for investment. The underwriting standards utilized forhome equity loans and home equity lines of credit include a determination of the applicant’s credit history, an assessment of the applicant’s ability to meet existingobligations and payments on the proposed loan, and the value of the collateral securing the loan. Home equity loans are offered with adjustable rates of interest andwith terms up to 10 years. The loan-to-value ratio for our home equity loans and our lines of credit is generally limited to 90% when combined with the first securitylien, if applicable. Our home equity lines of credit have ten-year terms and adjustable rates of interest, subject to a contractual floor, which are indexed to the primerate, as reported in The Wall Street Journal. Interest rates on home equity lines of credit are generally limited to a maximum rate of 18%. The average outstandinghome equity loan balance was $44,000 at December 31, 2018, with the largest outstanding balance at that date of $532,000.Construction and Land Loans. We originate construction loans for the acquisition of land and the construction of single-family residences, multi-familyresidences, and commercial real estate buildings. At December 31, 2018, construction and land loans totaled $13.4 million, or 1.0% of total loans. Construction andland loans originated for investment during the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $66.3 million, or 17.2% of all loans originated for investment. Of the $66.3 millionoriginated in 2018, a total of $59.0 million had yet to be advanced. At December 31, 2018, the unadvanced portion of the construction loan portfolio totaled $79.8million.Our construction mortgage loans generally provide for the payment of interest only during the construction phase, which is typically up to nine months forsingle-family residences although our policy is to consider construction periods as long as 12 months or more for multi-family residences and commercial buildings. Atthe end of the construction phase, the construction loan converts to a longer-term mortgage loan. Construction loans can be made with a maximum loan-to-value ratioof 90%, provided that the borrower obtains private mortgage insurance if the owner-occupied residential loan balance exceeds 80% of the lesser of the appraised valueor acquisition cost of the secured property. The average outstanding construction loan balance totaled $1.3 million on December 31, 2018, with the largest outstandingbalance at $3.9 million. The average outstanding land loan balance was $144,000 on December 31, 2018, and the largest outstanding balance on that date was $684,000.Before making a commitment to fund a construction loan, we require an appraisal of the property by an independent licensed appraiser. We also review andinspect each property before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan. Loan proceeds are disbursed after inspection based on either thepercentage of completion method or the actual cost of the completed work.Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of credit risk than longer-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate.Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion of construction compared tothe estimated cost (including interest) of construction and other assumptions. If the estimate of construction cost is inaccurate, we may be required to advance fundsbeyond the amount originally committed in order to protect the value of the property. Additionally, if the estimate of value is inaccurate, we may be confronted with aproject, when completed, with a value that is insufficient to ensure full repayment of the loan.- 7 -Commercial Real Estate Loans. Commercial real estate loans totaled $225.5 million at December 31, 2018, or 16.4% of total loans, and are made up of loanssecured by office and retail buildings, industrial buildings, churches, restaurants, other retail properties and mixed use properties. Commercial real estate loansoriginated for investment during the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $58.2 million, or 15.1% of all loans originated for investment. These loans are generallysecured by property located in our primary market area. Our commercial real estate underwriting policies provide that such real estate loans may be made in amounts ofup to 80% of the appraised value of the property. Commercial real estate loans are offered with interest rates that are fixed up to five years or are variable and eitheradjust based on a market index or at our discretion. Contractual maturities do not exceed 10 years while principal and interest payments are typically based on a 25-30-year amortization period. In reaching a decision whether to make a commercial real estate loan, we consider gross revenues and the net operating income of theproperty, the borrower’s expertise and credit history, business and global cash flow, and the appraised value of the underlying property. In addition, we will alsoconsider the terms and conditions of the leases and the credit quality of the tenants, if applicable. We generally require that the properties securing these real estateloans have debt service coverage ratios (the ratio of earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization divided by interest expense and currentmaturities of long term debt) of at least 1.15 times. Environmental surveys are required for commercial real estate loans when environmental risks are identified.Generally, commercial real estate loans made to corporations, partnerships and other business entities require personal guarantees by the principals and by the ownersof 20% or more of the borrower.A commercial real estate borrower’s financial information is monitored on an ongoing basis by requiring periodic financial statement updates, paymenthistory reviews and periodic face-to-face meetings with the borrower. We generally require borrowers with aggregate outstanding balances exceeding $1.0 million toprovide annual updated financial statements and federal tax returns. These requirements also apply to all guarantors on these loans. We also require borrowers toprovide an annual report of income and expenses for the property, including a tenant list and copies of leases, as applicable. The average commercial real estate loanin our portfolio at December 31, 2018 was $842,000, and the largest outstanding balance at that date was $8.8 million.Commercial Loans. Commercial loans totaled $32.8 million at December 31, 2018, or 2.4% of total loans, and are made up of loans secured by accountsreceivable, inventory, equipment and real estate. Commercial loans originated for investment during the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $6.2 million, or 1.6% ofall loans originated.Our commercial loans are generally made to borrowers that are located in our primary market area. Working capital lines of credit are granted for the purposeof carrying inventory and accounts receivable or purchasing equipment. These lines require that certain collateral levels must be maintained and are monitored on amonthly or quarterly basis. Working capital lines of credit are short-term loans of 12 months or less with variable interest rates. At December 31, 2018, theunadvanced portion of working capital lines of credit totaled $16.8 million. Outstanding balances fluctuate up to the maximum commitment amount based onfluctuations in the balance of the underlying collateral. Personal property loans secured by equipment are considered commercial business loans and are generallymade for terms of up to 84 months and for up to 80% of the value of the underlying collateral. Interest rates on equipment loans may be either fixed or variable. Commercial business loans are generally variable rate loans with initial fixed rate periods of up to five years.A commercial business borrower’s financial information is monitored on an ongoing basis by requiring periodic financial statement updates, usuallyquarterly, payment history reviews and periodic face-to-face meetings with the borrower. The average outstanding commercial loan at December 31, 2018 was $220,000and the largest outstanding balance on that date was $6.5 million.The following table shows loan origination, principal repayment activity, transfers to real estate owned, charge-offs and sales during the years indicated. As of or for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (In Thousands) Total gross loans receivable and held for sale at beginning of year $1,441,710 $1,403,132 $1,281,450 Real estate loans originated for investment: Residential One- to four-family 126,601 117,747 78,045 Multi-family 123,107 108,380 118,072 Home equity 4,613 5,430 5,037 Construction and land 66,265 2,270 5,878 Commercial real estate 58,176 61,684 35,443 Total real estate loans originated for investment 378,762 295,511 242,475 Consumer loans originated for investment 142 80 - Commercial loans originated for investment 6,221 19,610 11,692 Total loans originated for investment 385,125 315,201 254,167 Principal repayments (297,162) (197,623) (185,020)Transfers to real estate owned (545) (2,171) (4,590)Loan principal charged-off (84) (1,477) (1,607)Net activity in loans held for investment 87,334 113,930 62,950 Loans originated for sale 2,509,827 2,458,370 2,378,926 Loans sold (2,518,107) (2,533,722) (2,320,194)Net activity in loans held for sale (8,280) (75,352) 58,732 Total gross loans receivable and held for sale at end of year $1,520,764 $1,441,710 $1,403,132 - 8 -Origination and Servicing of Loans. All loans originated for investment are underwritten pursuant to internally developed policies and procedures. Whilewe generally underwrite owner-occupied residential mortgage loans to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae standards, due to several unique characteristics, our loansoriginated prior to 2008 do not conform to the secondary market standards. The unique features of these loans include interest payments in advance of the month inwhich they are earned and discretionary rate adjustments that are not tied to an independent index.Exclusive of our mortgage banking operations, we retain in our portfolio all of the loans that we originate. At December 31, 2018, WaterStone Bank was notservicing any loan it originated and subsequently sold to unrelated third parties. Loan servicing includes collecting and remitting loan payments, accounting forprincipal and interest, contacting delinquent mortgagors, supervising foreclosures and property dispositions in the event of unremedied defaults, making certaininsurance and tax payments on behalf of the borrowers and generally administering the loans.Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. WaterStone Bank’s lending activities follow written, non-discriminatory, underwriting standards and loanorigination procedures established by WaterStone Bank’s board of directors. The loan approval process is intended to assess the borrower’s ability to repay the loan,the viability of the loan and the adequacy of the value of the property that will secure the loan, if applicable. To assess the borrower’s ability to repay, we review theemployment and credit history and information on the historical and projected income and expenses of borrowers.Loan officers, with concurrence from independent credit officers and underwriters, are authorized to approve and close any loan that qualifies underWaterStone Bank underwriting guidelines within the following lending limits:●A secured one- to four-family mortgage loan up to $500,000 for a borrower with total outstanding loans from us of less than $1.0 million that is independentlyunderwritten can be approved by select loan officers. ●A loan up to $500,000 for a borrower with total outstanding loans from us of less than $500,000 can be approved by select commercial loan officers. ●Any secured mortgage loan ranging from $500,001 to $3,000,000 or any new loan to a borrower with outstanding loans from us exceeding $1.0 million must beapproved by the Officer Loan Committee. ●Any non-real estate loan ranging from $500,001 to $3,000,000 or any new non-real estate loan to a borrower with outstanding loans exceeding $500,000 must beapproved by the Officer Loan Committee. ●Any new loan over $3.0 million must be approved by the Officer Loan Committee and the board of directors prior to closing. Any new loan to a borrower withoutstanding loans from us exceeding $10.0 million must be reviewed by the board of directors.Asset QualityWhen a loan becomes more than 30 days delinquent, WaterStone Bank sends a letter advising the borrower of the delinquency. The borrower is given aspecific date by which delinquent payments must be made or by which they must contact WaterStone Bank to make arrangements to bring the loan current over alonger period of time. If the borrower fails to bring the loan current within the specified time period or to make arrangements to cure the delinquency over a longerperiod of time, the matter is referred to legal counsel and foreclosure or other collection proceedings are considered.All loans are reviewed on a regular basis, and loans are placed on non-accrual status when they become 90 or more days delinquent. When loans are placedon non-accrual status, unpaid accrued interest is reversed, and further income is recognized only to the extent received when collection of the remaining principalbalance is reasonably assured.Non-Performing Assets. Non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans and other real estate owned. Loans are generally placed on non-accrual statuswhen contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments. Additionally, whenever management becomes aware of facts or circumstances thatmay adversely impact the collectability of principal or interest on loans, management may place such loans on non-accrual status immediately, rather than waiting untilthe loan becomes 90 days past due. At the time a loan is placed on non-accrual status, previously accrued and uncollected interest on such loans is reversed andadditional income is recorded only to the extent that payments are received and the collection of principal is reasonably assured. Generally, loans are restored toaccrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time, and the ultimatecollectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt.- 9 -The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our non-accrual loans and real estate owned at the dates indicated. At December 31, 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 (Dollars in Thousands) Non-accrual loans: Residential One- to four-family $4,902 $4,677 $7,623 $13,888 $23,918 Multi-family 1,309 1,007 1,427 2,553 12,001 Home equity 201 107 344 437 445 Construction and land - - - 239 401 Commercial real estate 125 251 422 460 947 Commercial 18 26 41 27 299 Consumer - - - - - Total non-accrual loans 6,555 6,068 9,857 17,604 38,011 Real estate owned One- to four-family 163 1,330 2,141 4,610 10,896 Multi-family - - - 209 2,210 Construction and land 3,327 4,582 5,082 5,262 5,400 Commercial real estate 300 300 300 300 300 Total real estate owned 3,790 6,212 7,523 10,381 18,806 Valuation allowance at end of period (1,638) (1,654) (1,405) (1,191) (100)Total real estate owned, net 2,152 4,558 6,118 9,190 18,706 Total non-performing assets $8,707 $10,626 $15,975 $26,794 $56,817 Total non-accrual loans to total loans, net 0.48% 0.47% 0.84% 1.58% 3.47%Total non-accrual loans to total assets 0.34% 0.34% 0.55% 1.00% 2.13%Total non-performing assets to total assets 0.45% 0.59% 0.89% 1.52% 3.18%All loans that meet or exceed 90 days with respect to past due principal and interest are recognized as non-accrual. Troubled debt restructurings which arestill on non-accrual status either due to being past due 90 days or greater, or which have not yet performed under the modified terms for a reasonable period of time,are included in the table above. In addition, loans which are past due less than 90 days are evaluated to determine the likelihood of collectability given other credit riskfactors such as early stage delinquency, the nature of the collateral or the results of a borrower fiscal review. When the collection of all contractual principal andinterest is determined to be unlikely, the loan is moved to non-accrual status and an updated appraisal of the underlying collateral is ordered. This process generallytakes place between contractual past due dates 60 and 90 days. Upon determining the updated estimated value of the collateral, a loan loss provision is recorded toestablish a specific reserve to the extent that the outstanding principal balance exceeds the updated estimated net realizable value of the collateral. When a loan isdetermined to be uncollectible, generally coinciding with the initiation of foreclosure action, the specific reserve is reviewed for adequacy, adjusted if necessary, andcharged-off.The following table sets forth activity in our non-accrual loans for the years indicated. At and for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 (Dollars in Thousands) Balance at beginning of year $6,068 $9,857 $17,604 $38,011 $50,961 Additions 3,147 3,149 3,114 10,165 21,585 Transfers to real estate owned (545) (2,171) (4,590) (15,580) (16,645)Charge-offs (6) (766) (667) (3,809) (7,099)Returned to accrual status (777) (2,716) (4,183) (5,824) (4,470)Principal paydowns and other (1,332) (1,285) (1,421) (5,359) (6,321)Balance at end of year $6,555 $6,068 $9,857 $17,604 $38,011 Total non-accrual loans increased by $487,000, or 8.0%, to $6.6 million as of December 31, 2018 compared to $6.1 million as of December 31, 2017. The ratio ofnon-accrual loans to total loans receivable was 0.48% at December 31, 2018 compared to 0.47% at December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2018,$545,000 was transferred to real estate owned, $6,000 in loan principal was charged off, $1.3 million in principal payments were received and $777,000 in loans werereturned to accrual status. Offsetting this activity, $3.1 million in loans were placed on non-accrual status during the year ended December 31, 2018.- 10 -Of the $6.6 million in total non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2018, $5.4 million in loans have been specifically reviewed to assess whether a specificvaluation allowance is necessary. A specific valuation allowance is established for an amount equal to the impairment when the carrying value of the loan exceeds thepresent value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate or the fair value of the underlying collateral with an adjustmentmade for costs to dispose of the asset. Based upon these specific reviews, a total of $1.5 million in partial charge-offs have been recorded with respect to these loansas of December 31, 2018. Partially charged-off loans measured for impairment based upon net realizable collateral value are maintained in a “non-performing” statusand are disclosed as impaired loans. In addition, specific reserves totaling $113,000 have been recorded as of December 31, 2018. The remaining $1.1 million of non-accrual loans were reviewed on an aggregate basis and $224,000 in general valuation allowance was deemed necessary related to those loans as of December 31, 2018. The $224,000 in general valuation allowance is based upon a migration analysis performed with respect to similar non-accrual loans in prior periods.The outstanding principal balance of our five largest non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2018 totaled $1.9 million, which represents 28.6% of total non-accrual loans as of that date. These five loans did not have any charge-offs or require any specific valuation allowances as of December 31, 2018.For the year ended December 31, 2018, gross interest income that would have been recorded had our non-accruing loans been current in accordance withtheir original terms was $497,000. We received $376,000 of interest payments on such loans during the year ended December 31, 2018. Interest payments received aretreated as interest income on a cash basis as long as the remaining book value of the loan (i.e., after charge-off of all identified losses) is deemed to be fully collectible.If the remaining book value is not deemed to be fully collectible, all payments received are applied to unpaid principal. Determination as to the ultimate collectability ofthe remaining book value is supported by an updated credit department evaluation of the borrower's financial condition and prospects for repayment, includingconsideration of the borrower's sustained historical repayment performance and other relevant factors.There were no accruing loans past due 90 days or more during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 or 2016.Troubled Debt Restructurings. The following table summarizes troubled debt restructurings by the Company’s internal risk rating. At December 31, 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 (Dollars in Thousands) Troubled debt restructurings Substandard $4,256 $5,035 $7,025 $14,436 $22,629 Watch 2,476 47 3,112 3,103 3,488 Total troubled debt restructurings $6,732 $5,082 $10,137 $17,539 $26,117 Troubled debt restructurings totaled $6.7 million at December 31, 2018, compared to $5.1 million at December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2018, $6.2 million oftroubled debt restructurings, or 91.9%, were performing in accordance with their restructured terms. All troubled debt restructurings are considered to be impaired andare risk rated as either substandard or watch and are included in the internal risk rating tables disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Specificreserves have been established to the extent that the collateral-based impairment analyses indicate that a collateral shortfall exists or to the extent that a discountedcash flow analysis results in an impairment.We do not participate in government-sponsored troubled debt restructuring programs. Our troubled debt restructurings are short-term modifications. Typical initial restructured terms include six to twelve months of principal forbearance, a reduction in interest rate or both. Restructured terms do not include areduction of the outstanding principal balance unless mandated by a bankruptcy court. Troubled debt restructuring terms may be renewed or further modified at theend of the initial term for an additional period if performance has been acceptable and the short-term borrower difficulty persists.Information with respect to the accrual status of our troubled debt restructurings is provided in the following table. At December 31, 2018 2017 Accruing Non-accruing Accruing Non-accruing (In Thousands) One- to four-family $2,740 $844 $2,740 $1,156 Multi-family - 372 - 815 Home equity - - 47 - Construction and land - - - - Commercial real estate 2,759 17 290 34 $5,499 $1,233 $3,077 $2,005 - 11 -The following table sets forth activity in our troubled debt restructurings for the years indicated. At or for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 Accruing Non-accruing Accruing Non-accruing (In Thousands) Balance at beginning of year $3,077 $2,005 $6,154 $3,983 Additions 2,476 - - - Change in accrual status - - - - Charge-offs - - - - Returned to contractual/market terms (46) - (3,063) (1,756)Transferred to real estate owned - - - - Principal paydowns and other (8) (772) (14) (222)Balance at end of period $5,499 $1,233 $3,077 $2,005 For the year ended December 31, 2018, gross interest income that would have been recorded had our troubled debt restructurings been current in accordancewith their contractual terms was $507,000. We received $491,000 of interest payments on such loans during the year ended December 31, 2018. Interest paymentsreceived on non-accrual troubled debt restructurings are treated as interest income on a cash basis as long as the remaining book value of the loan (i.e., after charge-off of all identified losses) is deemed to be fully collectible. If the remaining book value is not deemed to be fully collectible, all payments received are applied tounpaid principal. Determination as to the ultimate collectability of the remaining book value is supported by an updated credit department evaluation of the borrower'sfinancial condition and prospects for repayment, including consideration of the borrower's sustained historical repayment performance and other relevant factors.If a restructured loan is current in all respects and a minimum of six consecutive restructured payments have been received, it can be considered for return toaccrual status. After a restructured loan that is current in all respects reverts to contractual/market terms, if a credit department review indicates no evidence ofelevated market risk, the loan is removed from the troubled debt restructuring classification.Loan Delinquency. The following table summarizes loan delinquency in total dollars and as a percentage of the total loan portfolio: At December 31, 2018 2017 (Dollars in Thousands) Loans past due less than 90 days $1,925 $1,878 Loans past due 90 days or more 5,025 3,974 Total loans past due $6,950 $5,852 Total loans past due to total loans receivable 0.50% 0.45%Past due loans increased by $1.1 million, or 18.8%, to $7.0 million at December 31, 2018 from $5.9 million at December 31, 2017. Loans past due 90 days ormore increased by $1.1 million, or 26.4%, during the year ended December 31, 2018 and loans past due less than 90 days increased by $47,000, or 2.5%. The $1.1million increase in loans past due 90 days or more was primarily due to an increase in the one- to four-family real estate loans of $318,000 and an increase in the multifamily loans of $745,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018.Potential Problem Loans. We define potential problem loans as substandard loans which are still accruing interest. We do not necessarily expect to realizelosses on potential problem loans, but we recognize potential problem loans carry a higher probability of default and require additional attention by management. Theaggregate principal amounts of potential problem loans as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $4.5 million and $5.5 million, respectively. Management believes it hasestablished an adequate allowance for probable loan losses as appropriate under generally accepted accounting principles.Real Estate Owned. Total real estate owned decreased by $2.4 million, or 52.8%, to $2.2 million at December 31, 2018, compared to $4.6 million at December31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2018, $545,000 was transferred from loans to real estate owned upon completion of foreclosure. During the same period,sales of real estate owned totaled $2.6 million. Write-downs totaled $309,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018. New appraisals received on real estate owned and collateral dependent impaired loans are based upon an "as is value" assumption. During the period oftime in which we are awaiting receipt of an updated appraisal, loans evaluated for impairment based upon collateral value are measured by the following:● Applying an updated adjustment factor to an existing appraisal;● Confirming that the physical condition of the real estate has not significantly changed since the last valuation date;● Comparing the estimated current value of the collateral to that of updated sales values experienced on similar collateral;● Comparing the estimated current value of the collateral to that of updated values seen on current appraisals of similar collateral; and● Comparing the estimated current value to that of updated listed sales prices on our real estate owned and that of similar properties (not owned bythe Company).- 12 -We owned 12 properties at December 31, 2018, compared to 33 properties as of December 31, 2017 and 30 properties at December 31, 2016. Habitable realestate owned is managed with the intent of attracting a lessee to generate revenue. Foreclosed properties are transferred to real estate owned at estimated netrealizable value, with charge-offs, if any, charged to the allowance for loan losses upon transfer to real estate owned. The fair value is primarily based upon updatedappraisals in addition to an analysis of current real estate market conditions.Allowance for Loan LossesWe establish valuation allowances on loans that are deemed to be impaired. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, itis probable that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. A valuation allowance is established for anamount equal to the impairment when the carrying amount of the loan exceeds the present value of the expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s originaleffective interest rate or the fair value of the underlying collateral.We also establish valuation allowances based on an evaluation of the various risk components that are inherent in the loan portfolio. The risk componentsthat are evaluated include past loan loss experience; the level of non-performing and classified assets; current economic conditions; volume, growth, and compositionof the loan portfolio; adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay; the estimated value of any underlying collateral; regulatory guidance; andother relevant factors. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to earnings and recoveries of previously charged-off loans and reduced by charge-offs. Theappropriateness of the allowance for loan losses is reviewed and approved quarterly by the WaterStone Bank board of directors. The allowance reflects management’sbest estimate of the amount needed to provide for the probable loss on impaired loans and other inherent losses in the loan portfolio, and is based on a risk modeldeveloped and implemented by management and approved by the WaterStone Bank board of directors.Actual results could differ from this estimate, and future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on unforeseen changes in loan quality andeconomic conditions. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the WDFI, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically reviewWaterStone Bank’s allowance for loan losses. Such regulators have the authority to require WaterStone Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on theirjudgments of information available to them at the time of their review or examination.Any loan that is 90 or more days past due is placed on non-accrual and classified as a non-performing loan. A loan is classified as impaired when it isprobable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. Non-performing loans are then evaluated and accountedfor in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.- 13 -The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses for the years indicated. At or for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 (Dollars in Thousands) Balance at beginning of year $14,077 $16,029 $16,185 $18,706 $24,264 Provision (credit) for loan losses (1,060) (1,166) 380 1,965 1,150 Charge-offs: Mortgage loans One- to four-family 69 1,364 1,003 3,855 2,424 Multi-family 14 92 489 2,281 5,247 Home equity 1 - 112 72 191 Construction and land - 14 3 84 496 Commercial real estate - 7 - 45 199 Consumer - - - 3 5 Commercial - - - - 293 Total charge-offs 84 1,477 1,607 6,340 8,855 Recoveries: Mortgage loans One- to four-family 159 293 811 649 1,833 Multi-family 89 208 152 992 189 Home equity 26 26 36 110 14 Construction and land 40 162 72 58 75 Commercial real estate 2 1 - 40 27 Consumer - 1 - 5 6 Commercial - - - - 3 Total recoveries 316 691 1,071 1,854 2,147 Net (recoveries) charge-offs (232) 786 536 4,486 6,708 Allowance at end of year $13,249 $14,077 $16,029 $16,185 $18,706 Ratios: Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans at end of year 202.12% 231.99% 162.62% 91.94% 49.21%Allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding at end of year 0.96% 1.09% 1.36% 1.45% 1.71%Net (recoveries) charge-offs to average loans outstanding (0.02%) 0.06% 0.05% 0.37% 0.55%Current year provision (credit) for loan losses to net (recoveries)charge-offs 456.90% (148.35%) 70.90% 43.80% 17.14%Net (recoveries) charge-offs to beginning of the year allowance (1.65%) 4.90% 3.31% 23.98% 27.65%Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table sets forth the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan category, the total loan balances bycategory, and the percent of loans in each category to total loans at the dates indicated. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarilyindicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other categories. At December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Allowancefor LoanLosses % ofLoans inCategoryto TotalLoans % ofAllowanceinCategoryto TotalAllowance Allowancefor LoanLosses % ofLoans inCategoryto TotalLoans % ofAllowanceinCategoryto TotalAllowance Allowancefor LoanLosses % ofLoans inCategoryto TotalLoans % ofAllowanceinCategoryto TotalAllowance (Dollars in Thousands) Real Estate: Residential One- to four-family $5,742 35.53% 43.34% $5,794 34.03% 41.16% $7,164 33.35% 44.69%Multi-family 4,153 43.29% 31.35% 4,431 44.77% 31.48% 4,809 47.42% 30.00%Home equity 325 1.45% 2.45% 356 1.64% 2.53% 364 1.85% 2.27%Construction and land 400 0.97% 3.02% 949 1.54% 6.74% 1,016 1.54% 6.34%Commercial real estate 2,126 16.35% 16.05% 1,881 15.16% 13.36% 1,951 13.53% 12.17%Commercial 483 2.38% 3.65% 656 2.84% 4.66% 713 2.28% 4.45%Consumer 20 0.03% 0.15% 10 0.02% 0.07% 12 0.03% 0.07%Total allowance for loan losses $13,249 100.00% 100.00% $14,077 100.00% 100.00% $16,029 100.00% 100.00%- 14 - At December 31, 2015 2014 Allowance forLoan Losses % of Loans inCategory toTotal Loans % of Allowancein Category toTotal Allowance Allowance forLoan Losses % of Loans inCategory toTotal Loans % of Allowancein Category toTotal Allowance (Dollars In Thousands) Real Estate: Residential One- to four-family $7,763 34.26% 47.96% $9,877 37.62% 52.80%Multi-family 5,000 49.08% 30.89% 5,358 47.70% 28.64%Home equity 433 2.18% 2.68% 422 2.67% 2.26%Construction and land 904 1.72% 5.59% 687 1.56% 3.67%Commercial real estate 1,680 10.66% 10.38% 1,951 8.65% 10.43%Commercial 396 2.07% 2.45% 403 1.78% 2.15%Consumer 9 0.03% 0.06% 8 0.02% 0.04%Total allowance for loan losses $16,185 100.00% 100.00% $18,706 100.00% 100.00%All impaired loans meeting the criteria established by management are evaluated individually, based primarily on the value of the collateral securing each loanand the ability of the borrowers to repay according to the terms of the loans, or based upon an analysis of the present value of the expected future cash flows underthe original contract terms as compared to the modified terms in the case of certain troubled debt restructurings. Specific loss allowances are established as requiredby this analysis. At least once each quarter, management evaluates the appropriateness of the balance of the allowance for loan losses based on several factors someof which are not loan specific, but are reflective of the inherent losses in the loan portfolio. This process includes, but is not limited to, a periodic review of loancollectability in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of loan activity, conditions that may affect the ability of the borrower to repay, underlying value ofcollateral and economic conditions in our immediate market area. All loans for which a specific loss review is not required are segregated by loan type and a lossallowance is established by using loss experience data and management’s judgment concerning other matters it considers significant including trends in non-performing loan balances, impaired loan balances, classified asset balances and the current economic environment. The allowance is allocated to each category ofloans based on the results of the above analysis.Our underwriting policies and procedures emphasize that credit decisions must rely on both the credit quality of the borrower and the estimated value of theunderlying collateral. Credit quality is assured only when the estimated value of the collateral is objectively determined and is not subject to significant fluctuation.The allowance for loan losses has been determined in accordance with GAAP. We are responsible for the timely and periodic determination of the amount ofthe allowance required. Any future provisions for loan losses will continue to be based upon our assessment of the overall loan portfolio and the underlyingcollateral, trends in non-performing loans, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. To the best of management's knowledge, all probable losses havebeen provided for in the allowance for loan losses.The establishment of the amount of the loan loss allowance inherently involves judgments by management as to the appropriateness of the allowance, whichultimately may or may not be correct. Higher than anticipated rates of loan default would likely result in a need to increase provisions in future years.At December 31, 2018, the allowance for loan losses was $13.2 million, compared to $14.1 million at December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2018, theallowance for loan losses to total loans receivable was 0.96% and 202.12% of non-performing loans, compared to 1.09%, and 231.99%, respectively at December 31,2017. The decrease in the allowance for loan losses during the year ended December 31, 2018 reflects a continued stabilization in the quality of the loan portfolio andcontinued improvement in the overall risk profile of the loan portfolio.Net recoveries totaled $232,000, or 0.02% of average loans for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to net charge-offs $786,000, or 0.06% of averageloans for the year ended December 31, 2017. The $1.0 million decrease in net charge-offs was primarily the result of a decrease in charge-offs in the one- to four-familyloan category offset primarily by decreases in recoveries in the multi-family and construction and land loan categories. Net charge-offs related to loans secured byone- to four-family residential loans decreased $1.2 million, or 108.4%, to $90,000 in net recoveries for year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to net charge-offs of$1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Partially offsetting the decrease, net recoveries related to loans secured by multi-family residential loans decreased$41,000, or 35.3%, to net recoveries of $75,000 for year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to net recoveries of $116,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017. Netrecoveries related to loans secured by construction and land loans decreased $108,000, or 73.0%, to net recoveries of $40,000 for year ended December 31, 2018, ascompared to recoveries of $148,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017.Mortgage Banking ActivityIn addition to the lending activities previously discussed, we also originate single-family residential mortgage loans for sale in the secondary market throughWaterstone Mortgage Corporation. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation originated $2.60 billion in mortgage loans held for sale during the year ended December 31,2018, which was an increase of $52.2 million, or 2.0%, from the $2.55 billion originated during the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase in loan productionvolume was driven by a 4.1% increase in mortgage purchase products partially offset by a 14.0% decrease in refinance products. Total mortgage banking incomedecreased $6.7 million, or 5.5%, to $115.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $122.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. Thedecrease in total mortgage banking income is due in part to a decrease in margin of approximately 7.9% for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to December31, 2017. We sell loans on both a servicing-released and a servicing retained basis. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation has contracted with a third party to service theloans for which we retain servicing.- 15 -Our overall margin can be affected by the mix of both loan type (conventional loans versus governmental) and loan purpose (purchase versus refinance). Conventional loans include loans that conform to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac standards, whereas governmental loans are those loans guaranteed by the federalgovernment, such as a Federal Housing Authority or U.S. Department of Agriculture loan. Loans originated for the purchase of a residential property, which generallyyield a higher margin than loans originated for refinancing existing loans, comprised 90.6% of total originations during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to88.8% of total originations during the year ended December 31, 2017. The mix of loan type trended towards more conventional loans and less governmental loanscomprising 69.7% and 30.3% of all loan originations, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to 64.5% and 35.5% of all loan originations,respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2017.Investment ActivitiesWauwatosa Investments, Inc. is WaterStone Bank’s investment subsidiary headquartered in the State of Nevada. Wauwatosa Investments, Inc. manages theback office function for WaterStone Bank’s investment portfolio. Our Chief Financial Officer and Treasury Officer are responsible for executing purchases and sales inaccordance with our investment policy and monitoring the investment activities of Wauwatosa Investments, Inc. The investment policy is reviewed annually bymanagement and changes to the policy are recommended to and subject to the approval of our board of directors. Authority to make investments under the approvedinvestment policy guidelines is delegated by the board to designated employees. While general investment strategies are developed and authorized by management,the execution of specific actions rests with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasury Officer who may act jointly in performing security trades. The Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasury Officer are responsible for ensuring that the guidelines and requirements included in the investment policy are followed and that all securities areconsidered prudent for investment. The Chief Financial Officer and the Treasury Officer are authorized to execute investment transactions (purchases and sales)without the prior approval of the board provided they are within the scope of the established investment policy.Our investment policy requires that all securities transactions be conducted in a safe and sound manner. Investment decisions are based upon a thoroughanalysis of each security instrument to determine its quality, inherent risks, fit within our overall asset/liability management objectives, effect on our risk-based capitalmeasurement and prospects for yield and/or appreciation. Consistent with our overall business and asset/liability management strategy, which focuses on sustaining adequate levels of core earnings, our investmentportfolio is comprised primarily of securities that are classified as available for sale. During the year ended December 31, 2018, no investment securities were sold.During the year ended December 31, 2017, one municipal security with a total book value of $555,000 was sold at a loss of $107,000. During the year ended December31, 2016, no investment securities were sold.Available for Sale PortfolioMortgage-backed Securities and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations. We purchase mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligationsguaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae. We invest in mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations to achieve positiveinterest rate spreads with minimal administrative expense, and to lower our credit risk. We regularly monitor the credit quality of this portfolio.Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are created by the pooling of mortgages and the issuance of a security. These securitiestypically represent a participation interest in a pool of single-family or multi-family mortgages, although we focus our investments on mortgage related securitiesbacked by one- to four-family mortgages. The issuers of such securities pool and resell the participation interests in the form of securities to investors such asWaterStone Bank, and in the case of government agency sponsored issues, guarantee the payment of principal and interest to investors. Mortgage-backed securitiesand collateralized mortgage obligations generally yield less than the loans that underlie such securities because of the cost of payment guarantees, if any, and creditenhancements. These fixed-rate securities are usually more liquid than individual mortgage loans.At December 31, 2018, mortgage-backed securities totaled $41.6 million. The mortgage-backed securities portfolio had a weighted average yield of 2.58% anda weighted average remaining life of 4.2 years at December 31, 2018. The estimated fair value of our mortgage-backed securities portfolio at December 31, 2018 was$474,000 less than the amortized cost of $42.1 million. Mortgage-backed securities valued at $1.8 million were pledged as collateral for mortgage banking activities as ofDecember 31, 2018. Investments in mortgage-backed securities involve a risk that actual prepayments may differ from estimated prepayments over the life of thesecurity, which may require adjustments to the amortization of any premium or accretion of any discount relating to such instruments, thereby changing the net yieldon such securities. There is also reinvestment risk associated with the cash flows from such securities or if such securities are redeemed by the issuer. In addition, themarket value of such securities may be adversely affected in a rising interest rate environment, particularly since all of our mortgage-backed securities have a fixed rateof interest. The relatively short weighted average remaining life of our mortgage-backed security portfolio mitigates our potential risk of loss in a rising interest rateenvironment.At December 31, 2018, collateralized mortgage obligations totaled $75.0 million. At December 31, 2018, the collateralized mortgage obligations portfolioconsisted entirely of securities backed by government sponsored enterprises or U.S. Government agencies. The collateralized mortgage obligations portfolio had aweighted average yield of 2.65% and a weighted average remaining life of 3.2 years at December 31, 2018. The estimated fair value of our collateralized mortgageobligations portfolio at December 31, 2018 was $968,000 less than the amortized cost of $75.9 million. Investments in collateralized mortgage obligations involve a riskthat actual prepayments may differ from estimated prepayments over the life of the security, which may require adjustments to the amortization of any premium oraccretion of any discount relating to such instruments, thereby changing the net yield on such securities. There is also reinvestment risk associated with the cashflows from such securities or if such securities are redeemed by the issuer. In addition, the market value of such securities may be adversely affected in a rising interestrate environment, particularly since all of our collateralized mortgage obligations have a fixed rate of interest. The relatively short weighted average remaining life ofour collateralized mortgage obligation portfolio mitigates our potential risk of loss in a rising interest rate environment.Municipal Obligations. These securities consist of obligations issued by school districts, counties and municipalities or their agencies and include generalobligation bonds, industrial development revenue bonds and other revenue bonds. Our investment policy requires that such municipal obligations be rated A+ orbetter by a nationally recognized rating agency at the date of purchase. A security that is downgraded below investment grade will require additional analysis ofcreditworthiness and a determination will be made to hold or dispose of the investment. We regularly monitor the credit quality of this portfolio. At December 31,2018, our municipal obligations portfolio totaled $55.9 million, all of which was classified as available for sale. The weighted average yield on this portfolio was 2.37%at December 31, 2018, with a weighted average remaining life of 5.2 years. The estimated market value of our municipal obligations bond portfolio at December 31, 2018was $706,000 more than the amortized cost of $55.2 million.- 16 -As of December 31, 2018, the Company identified one municipal security that was deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. The security was issued bya tax incremental district in a municipality located in Wisconsin. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company received audited financial statements withrespect to the municipal issuer that called into question the ability of the underlying taxing district that issued the securities to operate as a going concern. During theyear ended December 31, 2012, the Company’s analysis of the security in this municipality resulted in $77,000 in credit losses that were charged to earnings withrespect to this municipal security. An additional $17,000 credit loss was charged to earnings during the year ended December 31, 2014 with respect to this security as asale occurred at a discounted price. As of December 31, 2018, the remaining impaired bond had an amortized cost of $116,000 and a total life-to-date impairment of$94,000. Other Debt Securities. As of December 31, 2018, we held other debt securities with a fair value of $13.2 million and amortized cost of $15.0 million. Other debtsecurities consist of corporate bonds. The weighted average yield on this portfolio was 3.56% at December 31, 2018, with a weighted average remaining life of 7.8years. We regularly monitor the credit quality of this portfolio. Investment Securities Portfolio.The following table sets forth the carrying values of our available for sale securities portfolio at the dates indicated. At December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Amortized Amortized Amortized Cost Fair Value Cost Fair Value Cost Fair Value (In Thousands) Securities available for sale: Mortgage-backed securities $42,105 $41,631 $57,351 $57,435 $72,858 $73,413 Collateralized mortgage obligations Government sponsored enterprise issued 75,923 74,955 61,313 60,500 62,297 62,002 Government sponsored enterprise bonds - - 2,500 2,497 2,500 2,503 Municipal obligations 55,242 55,948 62,516 63,769 70,311 70,696 Other debt securities 15,002 13,186 15,005 14,525 17,399 16,950 Certificates of deposit - - 980 981 1,225 1,231 Total securities available for sale $188,272 $185,720 $199,665 $199,707 $226,590 $226,795 The following table sets forth, by issuer, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of our investments in a single issuer, as of December 31, 2018, thatexceeded 10% of our stockholders’ equity as of that date. At December 31, 2018 Amortized Cost Fair Value (In Thousands) Fannie Mae $68,187 $67,196 Freddie Mac 41,821 41,527 - 17 -Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The composition and maturities of the securities portfolio at December 31, 2018 are summarized in the following table. Maturities are based on the final contractual payment dates and do not reflect the impact of prepayments or early redemptions that may occur. Municipal obligationyields have not been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis. Certain mortgage related securities have interest rates that are adjustable and will reprice annually within thevarious maturity ranges. These repricing schedules are not reflected in the table below. One Year or Less More than One Yearthrough Five Years More than Five Yearsthrough Ten Years More than Ten Years Total Securities Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Amortized Average Amortized Average Amortized Average Amortized Average Amortized Average Cost Yield Cost Yield Cost Yield Cost Yield Cost Yield (Dollars in Thousands) Securities available for sale: Mortgage-backedsecurities $373 4.77% $33,339 2.44% $2,463 2.56% $5,930 3.25% $42,105 2.58%Collateralized mortgageobligations Governmentsponsored enterpriseissued 152 2.90% 69,772 2.66% 5,999 2.53% - - 75,923 2.65%Municipal obligations 1,990 1.61% 20,891 1.96% 31,754 2.65% 607 4.35% 55,242 2.37%Other debt securities 5,002 2.70% - 0.00% - - 10,000 4.00% 15,002 3.56%Total securitiesavailable for sale $7,517 2.51% $124,002 2.48% $40,216 2.62% $16,537 3.74% $188,272 2.63%Sources of FundsGeneral. Deposits have traditionally been our primary source of funds for use in lending and investment activities. We also rely on advances from theFederal Home Loan Bank of Chicago and borrowings from other commercial banks in the form of repurchase agreements collateralized by investment securities. Inaddition to deposits and borrowings, we derive funds from scheduled loan payments, investment maturities, loan prepayments, retained earnings and income onearning assets. While scheduled loan payments and income on earning assets are relatively stable sources of funds, deposit inflows and outflows can vary widelyand are influenced by prevailing market interest rates, economic conditions and competition from other financial institutions.Deposits. A majority of our depositors are persons or businesses who work, reside, or are located in Milwaukee and Waukesha Counties and, to a lesserextent, other southeastern Wisconsin communities. We offer a selection of deposit instruments, including checking, savings, money market deposit accounts, andfixed-term certificates of deposit. Deposit account terms vary, with the principal differences being the minimum balance required, the amount of time the funds mustremain on deposit and the interest rate. As of December 31, 2018, certificates of deposit comprised 70.9% of total customer deposits, and had a weighted average costof 2.01% on that date. Our reliance on certificates of deposit has resulted in a higher cost of funds than would otherwise be the case if demand deposits, savings andmoney market accounts made up a larger part of our deposit base. Development of our branch network and expansion of our commercial products and services andaggressively seeking lower cost savings, checking and money market accounts are expected to result in decreased reliance on higher-cost certificates of deposit.Interest rates paid, maturity terms, service fees and withdrawal penalties are established on a periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based primarily oncurrent operating strategies and market rates, liquidity requirements, rates paid by competitors and growth goals. To attract and retain deposits, we rely uponpersonalized customer service, long-standing relationships and competitive interest rates. We also provide remote deposit capture, internet banking and mobilebanking.The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market and other prevailing interest rates andcompetition. The variety of deposit accounts that we offer allows us to be competitive in obtaining funds and responding to changes in consumer demand. Based onhistorical experience, management believes our deposits are relatively stable. The ability to attract and maintain money market accounts and certificates of deposit,and the rates paid on these deposits, has been and will continue to be significantly affected by market conditions. At December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017,$735.9 million and $689.0 million of our deposit accounts were certificates of deposit, of which $472.5 million and $587.3 million, respectively, had maturities of one yearor less.Deposits increased by $71.1 million, or 7.4%, from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018. The increase in deposits was the result of a $46.9 million, or 6.8%increase in time deposits and a $24.2 million, or 8.7%, increase in total transaction accounts. The Company had no deposits obtained directly from brokers as ofDecember 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.- 18 -The following table sets forth the distribution of total deposit accounts, by account type, at the dates indicated. At December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Average EndingWeighted Average EndingWeighted Average EndingWeighted Average Cost of Average Average Cost of Average Average Cost of Average Balance Funds Yield Balance Funds Yield Balance Funds Yield (Dollars in Thousands) Deposit type: Demanddeposits $96,648 0.00% 0.00% $89,785 0.00% 0.00% $76,016 0.00% 0.00%NOW accounts 37,388 0.09% 0.07% 36,716 0.08% 0.08% 34,659 0.05% 0.05%Savings 58,454 0.04% 0.04% 62,016 0.04% 0.04% 60,084 0.04% 0.04%Money market 95,306 0.60% 0.38% 92,519 0.40% 0.31% 92,418 0.39% 0.41%Totaltransactionaccounts 287,796 0.22% 0.16% 281,036 0.15% 0.12% 263,177 0.15% 0.16% Certificates ofdeposit 709,102 1.55% 2.01% 671,982 1.09% 1.31% 674,310 1.03% 1.03%Total deposits $996,898 1.17% 1.48% $953,018 0.81% 0.97% $937,487 0.79% 0.77% At December 31, 2018, the aggregate balance of certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more was approximately $289.5 million. The following table sets forth thematurity of those certificates at December 31, 2018. (In Thousands) Due in: Three months or less $23,194 Over three months through six months 61,701 Over six months through 12 months 103,851 Over 12 months 100,707 Total $289,453 Borrowings. Our borrowings at December 31, 2018 consisted of $430.0 million in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago and $5.0 millionoutstanding balance in short-term repurchase agreements used to finance loans held for sale. The following table sets forth information concerning balances andinterest rates on borrowings at the dates and for the periods indicated. At or For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Borrowings: (Dollars in Thousands) Balance outstanding at end of year $435,046 $386,285 $387,155 Weighted average interest rate at the end of year 2.01% 1.57% 2.27%Maximum amount of borrowings outstanding at any month end during the year $451,132 $498,103 $414,745 Average balance outstanding during the year $427,301 $403,163 $381,803 Weighted average interest rate during the year 1.85% 2.14% 3.39%PersonnelAs of December 31, 2018, we had 888 full-time equivalent employees. A total of 178 are WaterStone Bank employees and 710 are employees of WaterstoneMortgage Corporation. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management believes that we have good working relations with ouremployees.Supervision and Regulation- 19 -GeneralWaterStone Bank is a stock savings bank organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin. The lending, investment, and other business operations ofWaterStone Bank are governed by Wisconsin law and regulations, as well as applicable federal law and regulations, and WaterStone Bank is prohibited from engagingin any operations not authorized by such laws and regulations. WaterStone Bank is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the WDFI and bythe Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution may engageand is intended primarily for the protection of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s deposit insurance fund and depositors, and not for the protection ofsecurity holders. WaterStone Bank also is regulated to a lesser extent by the Federal Reserve Board, governing reserves to be maintained against deposits and othermatters. WaterStone Bank also is a member of and owns stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, which is one of the 11 regional banks in the Federal HomeLoan Bank System.Under this system of regulation, the regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory, enforcement, rulemaking andexamination activities and policies, including rules or policies that: establish minimum capital levels; restrict the timing and amount of dividend payments; govern theclassification of assets; determine the adequacy of loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes; and establish the timing and amounts of assessments and fees.Moreover, as part of their examination authority, the banking regulators assign numerical ratings to banks and savings institutions relating to capital, asset quality,management, liquidity, earnings and other factors. These ratings are inherently subjective and the receipt of a less than satisfactory rating in one or more categoriesmay result in enforcement action by the banking regulators against a financial institution. A less than satisfactory rating may also prevent a financial institution, suchas WaterStone Bank or its holding company, from obtaining necessary regulatory approvals to access the capital markets, pay dividends, acquire other financialinstitutions or establish new branches.In addition, we must comply with significant anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism laws and regulations, Community Reinvestment Act laws andregulations, and fair lending laws and regulations. Government agencies have the authority to impose monetary penalties and other sanctions on institutions that failto comply with these laws and regulations, which could significantly affect our business activities, including our ability to acquire other financial institutions orexpand our branch network.As a savings and loan holding company, Waterstone Financial is required to comply with the rules and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board. It isrequired to file certain reports with the Federal Reserve Board and is subject to examination by and the enforcement authority of the Federal Reserve Board. Waterstone Financial is also subject to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the federal securities laws.Any change in applicable laws or regulations, whether by the WDFI, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board or Congress,could have a material adverse impact on the operations and financial performance of Waterstone Financial, WaterStone Bank and Waterstone Mortgage Corporation.Set forth below is a brief description of material regulatory requirements that are or will be applicable to WaterStone Bank, Waterstone Mortgage Corporationand Waterstone Financial. The description is limited to certain material aspects of the statutes and regulations addressed, and is not intended to be a completedescription of such statutes and regulations and their effects on WaterStone Bank, Waterstone Mortgage Corporation and Waterstone Financial.Intrastate and Interstate Merger and Branching ActivitiesWisconsin Law and Regulation. Any Wisconsin savings bank meeting certain requirements may, upon approval of the WDFI, establish one or more branchoffices in the state of Wisconsin and the states of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, and Ohio. In addition, upon WDFI approval, aWisconsin savings bank may establish a branch office in any other state as the result of a merger or consolidation.Federal Law and Regulation. The Interstate Banking Act permits the federal banking agencies to, under certain circumstances, approve acquisitiontransactions between banks located in different states, regardless of whether an acquisition would be prohibited under state law. The Interstate Banking Act, asamended, authorizes de novo branching into another state at locations at which banks chartered by the host state could establish a branch.Loans and InvestmentsWisconsin Law and Regulations. Under Wisconsin law and regulation, WaterStone Bank is authorized to make, invest in, sell, purchase, participate orotherwise deal in mortgage loans or interests in mortgage loans without geographic restriction, including loans made on the security of residential and commercialproperty. Wisconsin savings banks also may lend funds on a secured or unsecured basis for business, commercial or agricultural purposes, provided the total of allsuch loans does not exceed 20% of the savings bank’s total assets, unless the WDFI authorizes a greater amount. Loans are subject to certain other limitations,including percentage restrictions based on total assets.Wisconsin savings banks may invest funds in certain types of debt and equity securities, including obligations of federal, state and local governments andagencies. Subject to prior approval of the WDFI, compliance with capital requirements and certain other restrictions, Wisconsin savings banks may invest inresidential housing development projects. Wisconsin savings banks may also invest in service corporations or subsidiaries with the prior approval of the WDFI,subject to certain restrictions. Similarly, the line of credit that WaterStone Bank provides to Waterstone Mortgage Corporation is subject to the approval of the WDFI.Wisconsin savings banks may make loans and extensions of credit, both direct and indirect, to one borrower in amounts up to 20% of the savings bank’scapital plus an additional 5% for loans fully secured by readily marketable collateral. In addition, and notwithstanding the 20% of capital and additional 5% of capitallimitations set forth above, Wisconsin savings banks may make loans to one borrower, or a related group of borrowers, for any purpose in an amount not to exceed$500,000, or to develop domestic residential housing units in an amount not to exceed the lesser of $30 million or 30% of the savings bank’s capital, subject to certainconditions. At December 31, 2018, WaterStone Bank did not have any loans which exceeded the “loans-to-one borrower” limitations.- 20 -In addition, under Wisconsin law, WaterStone Bank must qualify for and maintain a level of qualified thrift investments equal to 60% of its assets asprescribed in Section 7701(a)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. A Wisconsin savings bank that fails to meet this qualified thrift lender testbecomes subject to certain operating restrictions otherwise applicable only to commercial banks. At December 31, 2018, WaterStone Bank maintained 84.9% of itsassets in qualified thrift investments and therefore met the qualified thrift lender requirement.Federal Law and Regulation. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regulations also govern the equity investments of WaterStone Bank and,notwithstanding Wisconsin law and regulations, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regulations prohibit WaterStone Bank from making certain equity investmentsand generally limit WaterStone Bank’s equity investments to those that are permissible for national banks and their subsidiaries. Under Federal Deposit InsuranceCorporation regulations, WaterStone Bank must obtain prior Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation approval before directly, or indirectly through a majority-ownedsubsidiary, engaging “as principal” in any activity that is not permissible for a national bank unless certain exceptions apply. The activity regulations provide thatstate banks that meet applicable minimum capital requirements would be permitted to engage in certain activities that are not permissible for national banks, includingcertain real estate and securities activities conducted through subsidiaries. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation will not approve an activity that it determinespresents a significant risk to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance fund. The current activities of WaterStone Bank and its subsidiaries are permissibleunder applicable federal regulations.Loans to, and other transactions with, affiliates of WaterStone Bank, such as Waterstone Financial, are restricted by the Federal Reserve Act and regulationsissued by the Federal Reserve Board thereunder. See “—Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders” below.Lending StandardsWisconsin Law and Regulation. Wisconsin law and regulations issued by the WDFI impose on Wisconsin savings banks certain fairness in lendingrequirements and prohibit savings banks from discriminating against a loan applicant based upon the applicant’s physical condition, developmental disability, sex,marital status, race, color, creed, national origin, religion or ancestry.Federal Law and Regulation. The federal banking agencies have adopted uniform regulations prescribing standards for extensions of credit that are securedby liens on interests in real estate or made for the purpose of financing the construction of a building or other improvements to real estate. Under the joint regulationsadopted by the federal banking agencies, all insured depository institutions, such as WaterStone Bank, must adopt and maintain written policies that establishappropriate limits and standards for extensions of credit that are secured by liens or interests in real estate or are made for the purpose of financing permanentimprovements to real estate. These policies must establish loan portfolio diversification standards, prudent underwriting standards (including loan-to-value limits) thatare clear and measurable, loan administration procedures, and loan documentation, approval and reporting requirements. The real estate lending policies must reflectconsideration of the Interagency Guidelines for Real Estate Lending Policies that have been adopted by the federal bank regulators.The Interagency Guidelines, among other things, require a depository institution to establish internal loan-to-value limits for real estate loans that are not inexcess of the following supervisory limits: ●for loans secured by raw land, the supervisory loan-to-value limit is 65% of the value of the collateral; ●for land development loans (i.e., loans for the purpose of improving unimproved property prior to the erection of structures), the supervisory limit is75%; ●for loans for the construction of commercial, over four-family or other non-residential property, the supervisory limit is 80%; ●for loans for the construction of one- to four-family properties, the supervisory limit is 85%; and ●for loans secured by other improved property (e.g., farmland, completed commercial property and other income-producing property, including non-owner occupied, one- to four-family property), the limit is 85%.Although no supervisory loan-to-value limit has been established for permanent mortgages on owner-occupied, one- to four-family and home equity loans,the Interagency Guidelines state that for any such loan with a loan-to-value ratio that equals or exceeds 90% at origination, an institution should require appropriatecredit enhancement in the form of either mortgage insurance or readily marketable collateral.DepositsWisconsin Law and Regulation. Under Wisconsin law, WaterStone Bank is permitted to establish deposit accounts and accept deposits. WaterStone Bank’sboard of directors, or its designee, determines the rate and amount of interest to be paid on or credited to deposit accounts subject to Federal Deposit InsuranceCorporation limitations.Deposit InsuranceWisconsin Law and Regulation. Under Wisconsin law, WaterStone Bank is required to obtain and maintain insurance on its deposits from a depositinsurance corporation. The deposits of WaterStone Bank are insured up to the applicable limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.Federal Law and Regulation. WaterStone Bank is a member of the Deposit Insurance Fund, which is administered by the Federal Deposit InsuranceCorporation. The Bank’s deposit accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, generally up to a maximum of $250,000.- 21 -The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation imposes an assessment against all insured depository institutions. An institution's assessment rate dependsupon the perceived risk of the institution to the Deposit Insurance Fund, with less risky institutions paying lower rates. Currently, assessments for institutions of lessthan $10 billion of total assets are based on financial measures and supervisory ratings derived from statistical models estimating the probability of failure within threeyears. Assessment rates (inclusive of possible adjustments) currently range from 1.5 to 30 basis points of each institution's total assets less tangible capital. TheFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation may increase or decrease the range of assessments uniformly, except that no adjustment can deviate more than two basispoints from the base assessment rate without notice and comment rulemaking. The existing system represents a change, required by the Dodd-Frank Act, from theFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s prior practice of basing the assessment on an institution's aggregate deposits.The Dodd-Frank Act increased the minimum target Deposit Insurance Fund ratio from 1.15% of estimated insured deposits to 1.35% of estimated insureddeposits. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation was required to seek to achieve the 1.35% ratio by September 30, 2020. The Federal Deposit InsuranceCorporation indicated that the 1.35% ratio was exceeded in November 2018. Insured institutions of less than $10 billion of assets will receive credits for the portion oftheir assessments that contributed to the reserve ratio between 1.15% and 1.35%. The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the 1.5% maximum fund ratio, instead leaving it tothe discretion of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has exercised that discretion by establishing a long-rangefund ratio of 2%.The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has the authority to increase insurance assessments. A significant increase in insurance premiums would havean adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of WaterStone Bank. We cannot predict what deposit insurance assessment rates will be in thefuture.Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsoundpractices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FederalDeposit Insurance Corporation. We do not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.In addition to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments, the Financing Corporation (FICO) is authorized to impose and collect, with theapproval of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, assessments for anticipated payments, issuance costs and custodial fees on bonds issued by the FICO in the1980s to recapitalize the former Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. The bonds issued by the FICO are due to mature in 2017 through 2019. For thequarter ended December 31, 2018, the annualized FICO assessment was equal to 0.14 basis points of total assets less tangible capital.CapitalizationWisconsin Law and Regulation. Wisconsin savings banks are required to maintain a minimum capital to assets ratio of 6% and must maintain total capitalnecessary to ensure the continuation of insurance of deposit accounts by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. If the WDFI determines that the financialcondition, history, management or earning prospects of a savings bank are not adequate, the WDFI may require a higher minimum capital level for the savings bank. Ifa Wisconsin savings bank’s capital ratio falls below the required level, the WDFI may direct the savings bank to adhere to a specific written plan established by theWDFI to correct the savings bank’s capital deficiency, as well as a number of other restrictions on the savings bank’s operations, including a prohibition on thepayment of dividends. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, WaterStone Bank’s capital to assets ratio, as calculated under Wisconsin law, was 20.01% and 21.44%,respectively.Federal Law and Regulation. Federal regulations require Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured depository institutions to meet several minimumcapital standards: a common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 6.0%, a total capital to risk-basedassets of 8.0%, and a 4.0% Tier 1 capital to total assets leverage ratio.Common equity Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common stockholders’ equity and retained earnings. Tier 1 capital is generally defined as commonequity Tier 1 and additional Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier 1 capital includes certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interestsin equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. Total capital includes Tier 1 capital (common equity Tier 1 capital plus additional Tier 1 capital) and Tier 2 capital. Tier2 capital is comprised of capital instruments and related surplus, meeting specified requirements, and may include cumulative preferred stock and long-term perpetualpreferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, intermediate preferred stock and subordinated debt. Also included in Tier 2 capital is the allowance for loan andlease losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and, for institutions that have exercised an opt-out election regarding the treatment of AccumulatedOther Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”), up to 45% of net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values. Institutions that have not exercised the AOCI opt-out have AOCI incorporated into common equity Tier 1 capital (including unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale-securities). WaterStone Bank exercised its AOCI opt-out election. Calculation of all types of regulatory capital is subject to deductions and adjustmentsspecified in the regulations.In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating risk-based capital ratios, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets(e.g., recourse obligations, direct credit substitutes, residual interests) are multiplied by a risk weight factor assigned by the regulations based on the risks believedinherent in the type of asset. Higher levels of capital are required for asset categories believed to present greater risk. For example, a risk weight of 0% is assigned tocash and U.S. government securities, a risk weight of 50% is generally assigned to prudently underwritten first lien one to four- family residential real estate loans, arisk weight of 100% is assigned to commercial and consumer loans, a risk weight of 150% is assigned to certain past due loans and a risk weight of between 0% to600% is assigned to permissible equity interests, depending on certain specified factors.In addition to establishing the minimum regulatory capital requirements, the regulations limit capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus paymentsto management if the institution does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted asset above theamount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer requirement was phased in beginning January 1, 2016 untilfully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019.In assessing an institution’s capital adequacy, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation takes into consideration, not only these numeric factors, butqualitative factors as well, including the bank’s exposure to interest rate risk. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has the authority to establish higher capitalrequirements for individual institutions where deemed necessary due to a determination that an institution’s capital level is, or is likely to become, inadequate in lightof particular circumstances.- 22 -Legislation enacted in May 2018 requires the federal banking agencies, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, to establish a “community bankleverage ratio” of between 8% to 10% of average total consolidated assets for qualifying institutions with assets of less than $10 billion of assets. Institutions withcapital meeting the specified requirement and electing to follow the alternative framework would be deemed to comply with the applicable regulatory capitalrequirements, including the risk-based requirements. The federal regulators have issued a proposed rule that would set the ratio at 9%.Safety and Soundness StandardsEach federal banking agency, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, has adopted guidelines establishing general standards relating to internalcontrols, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings and compensation, fees andbenefits, and information security. In general, the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks andexposures specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe compensation as excessivewhen the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director, or principal shareholder.Prompt Corrective Regulatory ActionFederal bank regulatory authorities are required to take "prompt corrective action" with respect to institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements.For these purposes, the statute establishes five capital categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, andcritically undercapitalized. Under the regulations, a bank is deemed to be (i) "well capitalized" if it has total risk-based capital of 10.0% or more, has a Tier 1 risk-basedcapital ratio of 8.0% or more, has a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 5.0% or more and a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 6.5% or more, and is not subject to any writtencapital order or directive; (ii) "adequately capitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or more, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or more, a Tier 1leveraged capital ratio of 4.0% or more and a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 4.5% or more, and does not meet the definition of "well capitalized"; (iii) "undercapitalized"if it has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio that is less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio that is less than 4.0% ora common equity Tier 1 ratio of less than 4.5%; (iv) "significantly undercapitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 6.0% and a Tier 1 risk-basedcapital ratio that is less than 4.0% or a common equity Tier 1 ratio of less than 3.0%; and (v) "critically undercapitalized" if it has a ratio of tangible equity to totalassets that is equal to or less than 2.0%.Federal law and regulations also specify circumstances under which a federal banking agency may reclassify a well capitalized institution as adequatelycapitalized and may require an institution classified as less than well capitalized to comply with supervisory actions as if it were in the next lower category (except thatthe Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation may not reclassify a significantly undercapitalized institution as critically undercapitalized).The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation may order savings banks that have insufficient capital to take corrective actions. For example, a savings bankthat is categorized as “undercapitalized” is subject to growth limitations and is required to submit a capital restoration plan, and a holding company that controls sucha savings bank is required to guarantee that the savings bank complies with the restoration plan. A “significantly undercapitalized” savings bank may be subject toadditional restrictions. Savings banks deemed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to be “critically undercapitalized” would be subject to the appointment ofa receiver or conservator.At December 31, 2018, WaterStone Bank was considered well-capitalized with a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 26.05%, Tier 1 leverage ratio of 20.08%, a Tier 1risk-based ratio of 26.05% and a total risk based capital ratio of 26.95%.DividendsUnder Wisconsin law and applicable regulations, a Wisconsin savings bank that meets its regulatory capital requirements may declare dividends on capitalstock based upon net profits, provided that its paid-in surplus equals its capital stock. In addition, prior WDFI approval is required before dividends exceeding 50% ofnet profits for any calendar year may be declared and before a stock dividend may be declared out of retained earnings. Under WDFI regulations, a Wisconsin savingsbank which has converted from mutual to stock form also is prohibited from paying a dividend on its capital stock if the payment causes the regulatory capital of thesavings bank to fall below the amount required for its liquidation account.The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has the authority to prohibit WaterStone Bank from paying dividends if, in its opinion, the payment of dividendswould constitute an unsafe or unsound practice in light of the financial condition of WaterStone Bank. Institutions may not pay dividends if they would be“undercapitalized” following payment of the dividend within the meaning of the prompt corrective action regulations.Information with respect to regulation regarding dividends declared and paid by Waterstone Financial is disclosed under "Holding Company Dividends."Liquidity and ReservesWisconsin Law and Regulation. Under WDFI regulations, all Wisconsin savings banks are required to maintain a certain amount of their assets as liquidassets, consisting of cash and certain types of investments. The exact amount of assets a savings bank is required to maintain as liquid assets is set by the WDFI, butgenerally ranges from 4% to 15% of the savings bank’s average daily balance of net withdrawable accounts plus short-term borrowings (the “Required LiquidityRatio”). At December 31, 2018, WaterStone Bank’s Required Liquidity Ratio was 8.0%, and WaterStone Bank was in compliance with this requirement. In addition, 50%of the liquid assets maintained by a Wisconsin savings bank must consist of “primary liquid assets,” which are defined to include securities issued by the UnitedStates Government, United States Government agencies, or the state of Wisconsin or a subdivision thereof, and cash. At December 31, 2018, WaterStone Bank was incompliance with this requirement.- 23 -Federal Law and Regulation. Under federal law and regulations, WaterStone Bank is required to maintain sufficient liquidity to ensure safe and soundbanking practices. Regulation D, promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board, imposes reserve requirements on all depository institutions, including WaterStone Bank,which maintain transaction accounts or non-personal time deposits. Checking accounts, NOW accounts, Super NOW checking accounts, and certain other types ofaccounts that permit payments or transfers to third parties fall within the definition of transaction accounts and are subject to Regulation D reserve requirements, asare any non-personal time deposits (including certain money market deposit accounts) at a savings institution. For 2017, a depository institution was required tomaintain average daily reserves equal to 3% on the first $115.1 million of transaction accounts, plus 10% of that portion of total transaction accounts in excess of$115.1 million. The first $15.5 million of otherwise reservable balances (subject to adjustment by the Federal Reserve Board) was exempt from the reserve requirements.These percentages and threshold limits are subject to adjustment by the Federal Reserve Board and increased to a threshold of $122.3 million and an exemption of$16.0 million for 2018. Savings institutions have authority to borrow from the Federal Reserve’s “discount window,” but Federal Reserve policy generally requiressavings institutions to exhaust all other sources before borrowing from the Federal Reserve. As of December 31, 2018, WaterStone Bank met its Regulation D reserverequirements.Transactions with Affiliates and InsidersWisconsin Law and Regulation. Under Wisconsin law, a savings bank may not make a loan to a person owning 10% or more of its stock, an affiliated person(including a director, officer, the spouse of either and a member of the immediate family of such person who is living in the same residence), agent, or attorney of thesavings bank, either individually or as an agent or partner of another, except as under the rules of the WDFI and regulations of the Federal Deposit InsuranceCorporation. In addition, unless the prior approval of the WDFI is obtained, a savings bank may not purchase, lease or acquire a site for an office building or aninterest in real estate from an affiliated person, including a shareholder owning more than 10% of its capital stock, or from any firm, corporation, entity or family inwhich an affiliated person or 10% shareholder has a direct or indirect interest.Federal Law and Regulation. Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act govern transactions between an insured savings bank, such as WaterStoneBank, and any of its affiliates, including Waterstone Financial. The Federal Reserve Board has adopted Regulation W, which comprehensively implements andinterprets Sections 23A and 23B, in part by codifying prior Federal Reserve Board interpretations under Sections 23A and 23B.An affiliate of a savings bank is any company or entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the savings bank. A subsidiary of asavings bank that is not also a depository institution or a “financial subsidiary” under federal law is not treated as an affiliate of the savings bank for the purposes ofSections 23A and 23B; however, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has the discretion to treat subsidiaries of a savings bank as affiliates on a case-by-casebasis. Sections 23A and 23B limit the extent to which a savings bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to an amountequal to 10% of such savings bank’s capital stock and surplus, and limit all such transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such capital stock andsurplus. The term “covered transaction” includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of guarantees and other similar types of transactions. Further,most loans and other extensions of credit by a savings bank to any of its affiliates must be secured by collateral in amounts ranging from 100% to 130% of the loanamounts, depending on the type of collateral. In addition, any affiliate transaction by a savings bank must be on terms that are substantially the same, or at least asfavorable, to the savings bank as those that would be provided to a non-affiliate, and be consistent with safe and sound banking practices.A savings bank’s loans to its executive officers, directors, any owner of more than 10% of its stock (each, an insider) and any of certain entities affiliated withany such person (an insider’s related interest) are subject to the conditions and limitations imposed by Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and the FederalReserve Board’s Regulation O thereunder. Under these restrictions, the aggregate amount of the loans to any insider and the insider’s related interests may not exceedthe loans-to-one-borrower limit applicable to national banks, (which is generally 15% of capital and surplus). Aggregate loans by a savings bank to its insiders andinsiders’ related interests in the aggregate may not exceed the savings bank’s unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. With certain exceptions, loans to anexecutive officer, other than loans for the education of the officer’s children and certain loans secured by the officer’s primary residence, may not exceed the greater of$25,000 or 2.5% of the savings bank’s unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus, but in no event more than $100,000. Regulation O also requires that any proposedloan to an insider or a related interest of that insider be approved in advance by a majority of the board of directors of the savings bank, with any interested directornot participating in the voting, if such loan, when aggregated with any existing loans to that insider and the insider’s related interests, would exceed either $500,000 orthe greater of $25,000 or 5% of the savings bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus. Generally, such loans must be made on substantially the same terms as, and followcredit underwriting procedures that are no less stringent than, those that are prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and must notpresent more than a normal risk of collectability.An exception to the requirement is made for extensions of credit made pursuant to a benefit or compensation plan of a bank that is widely available toemployees of the savings bank and that does not give any preference to insiders of the bank over other employees of the bank. Consistent with these requirements,the Bank offered employees special terms for home mortgage loans on their principal residences. Effective April 1, 2006, this program was discontinued for new loanoriginations. Under the terms of the discontinued program, the employee interest rate is based on the Bank’s cost of funds on December 31st of the immediatelypreceding year and is adjusted annually. At December 31, 2018, the rate of interest on an employee rate mortgage loan was 1.06%, compared to the weighted averagerate of 4.51% on all single family mortgage loans. This rate increased to 1.62% effective March 1, 2019. Employee rate mortgage loans totaled $1.1 million, or 0.3%, ofour residential mortgage loan portfolio on December 31, 2018.Transactions between Bank Customers and AffiliatesWisconsin savings banks, such as WaterStone Bank, are subject to the prohibitions on certain tying arrangements. Subject to certain exceptions, a savingsbank is prohibited from extending credit to or offering any other service to a customer, or fixing or varying the consideration for such extension of credit or service, onthe condition that such customer obtain some additional service from the institution or certain of its affiliates or not obtain services of a competitor of the institution.Examinations and AssessmentsWaterStone Bank is required to file periodic reports with and is subject to periodic examinations by the WDFI and FDIC. Federal regulations require annualon-site examinations for all depository institutions except certain well-capitalized and highly rated institutions with assets of less than $3 billion which are examinedevery 18 months. WaterStone Bank is required to pay examination fees and annual assessments to fund its supervision.- 24 -Customer PrivacyUnder Wisconsin and federal law and regulations, savings banks, such as WaterStone Bank, are required to develop and maintain privacy policies relating toinformation on its customers, restrict access to and establish procedures to protect customer data. Applicable privacy regulations further restrict the sharing of non-public customer data with non-affiliated parties if the customer requests.Community Reinvestment ActUnder the Community Reinvestment Act, WaterStone Bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its safe and sound operation to helpmeet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The Community Reinvestment Act does not establish specificlending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes arebest suited to its particular community, consistent with the Community Reinvestment Act. The Community Reinvestment Act requires the Federal Deposit InsuranceCorporation, in connection with its examination of WaterStone Bank, to assess WaterStone Bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take thatrecord into account in the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s evaluation of certain applications by WaterStone Bank. For example, the regulations specify that abank’s Community Reinvestment Act performance will be considered in its expansion (e.g., branching or merger) proposals and may be the basis for approving,denying or conditioning the approval of an application. As of the date of its most recent regulatory examination, WaterStone Bank was rated “satisfactory” withrespect to its Community Reinvestment Act compliance.Federal Home Loan Bank SystemThe Federal Home Loan Bank System, consisting of 11 Federal Home Loan Banks, is under the jurisdiction of the Federal Housing Finance Board. Thedesignated duties of the Federal Housing Finance Board are to supervise the Federal Home Loan Banks; ensure that the Federal Home Loan Banks carry out theirhousing finance mission; ensure that the Federal Home Loan Banks remain adequately capitalized and able to raise funds in the capital markets; and ensure that theFederal Home Loan Banks operate in a safe and sound manner.WaterStone Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the Federal Home LoanBank of Chicago in specified amounts. WaterStone Bank is in compliance with this requirement with an investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago stock of$19.4 million at December 31, 2018.Among other benefits, the Federal Home Loan Banks provide a central credit facility primarily for member institutions. It is funded primarily from proceedsderived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the Federal Home Loan Bank System. It makes advances to members in accordance with policies and proceduresestablished by the Federal Housing Finance Board and the board of directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago. At December 31, 2018, WaterStone Bank had$430.0 million in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago.USA PATRIOT ActThe USA PATRIOT Act gives the federal government powers to address terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures, expandedsurveillance powers, increased information sharing and broadened anti-money laundering requirements. The USA PATRIOT Act also required the federal bankingagencies to take into consideration the effectiveness of controls designed to combat money laundering activities in determining whether to approve a merger or otheracquisition application of a member institution. Accordingly, if we engage in a merger or other acquisition, our controls designed to combat money laundering wouldbe considered as part of the application process. We have established policies, procedures and systems designed to comply with these regulations.Regulation of Waterstone Mortgage CorporationWaterstone Mortgage Corporation is subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations and may be subject to various judicial andadministrative decisions imposing various requirements and restrictions on its business. These laws, regulations and judicial and administrative decisions to whichWaterstone Mortgage Corporation is subject include those pertaining to: real estate settlement procedures; fair lending; fair credit reporting; truth in lending;compliance with net worth and financial statement delivery requirements; compliance with federal and state disclosure and licensing requirements; the establishmentof maximum interest rates, finance charges and other charges; secured transactions; collection, foreclosure, repossession and claims-handling procedures; other tradepractices and privacy regulations providing for the use and safeguarding of non-public personal financial information of borrowers; and guidance on non-traditionalmortgage loans issued by the federal financial regulatory agencies. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation may also be required to comply with any additionalrequirements that its customers may be subject to by their regulatory authorities.Holding Company RegulationWaterstone Financial is a unitary savings and loan holding company subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve Board. The FederalReserve Board has enforcement authority over Waterstone Financial and its non-savings institution subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits theFederal Reserve Board to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a risk to WaterStone Bank. In addition, any company that owns or controls, directly orindirectly, more than 25% of the voting securities of a state savings bank is subject to regulation as a savings bank holding company by the WDFI. WaterstoneFinancial is subject to regulation as a savings bank holding company under Wisconsin law. However, the WDFI has not issued specific regulations governing savingsbank holding companies.As a savings and loan holding company, Waterstone Financial’s activities are limited to those activities permissible by law for financial holding companies (ifWaterstone Financial makes an election to be treated as a financial holding company and meets the other requirements to be a financial holding company) or multiplesavings and loan holding companies. A financial holding company may engage in activities that are financial in nature, incidental to financial activities orcomplementary to a financial activity. Such activities include lending and other activities permitted for bank holding companies, insurance and underwriting equitysecurities. Multiple savings and loan holding companies are authorized to engage in activities specified by federal regulation.- 25 -Federal law prohibits a savings and loan holding company, directly or indirectly, or through one or more subsidiaries, from acquiring more than 5% of anothersavings institution or savings and loan holding company without prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Board, and from acquiring or retaining control of anydepository institution not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings institutions, theFederal Reserve Board must consider such things as the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the company and institution involved, the effectof the acquisition on and the risk to the federal deposit insurance fund, the convenience and needs of the community and competitive factors. A savings and loanholding company may not acquire a savings institution in another state and hold the target institution as a separate subsidiary unless it is a supervisory acquisitionunder Section 13(k) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act or the law of the state in which the target is located authorizes such acquisitions by out-of-state companies.Savings and loan holding companies historically have not been subject to consolidated regulatory capital requirements, although bank holding companieshave been. Legislation enacted in May 2018 required the Federal Reserve Board to raise the asset size threshold of its “small holding company” exception to theapplicability of consolidated holding company capital requirements from $1 billion. That change became effective in August 2018. Consequently, holding companieswith less than $3 billion of consolidated assets, such as Waterstone Financial, are generally not subject to the requirements unless otherwise advised by the FederalReserve Board. Waterstone Financial’s consolidated capital exceeded the minimum requirements as of December 31, 2018.The Dodd-Frank Act extended the "source of strength" doctrine to savings and loan holding companies. The Federal Reserve Board promulgatedregulations implementing the "source of strength" policy, which requires holding companies to act as a source of strength to their subsidiary depository institutionsby providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of financial stress.The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy statement regarding the payment of dividends and the repurchase of shares of common stock by bankholding companies and savings and loan holding companies. In general, the policy provides that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and only if theprospective rate of earnings retention by the holding company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition.Regulatory guidance provides for prior regulatory consultation with respect to capital distributions in certain circumstances such as where the company’s net incomefor the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid over that period, is insufficient to fully fund a proposed dividend or the company’s overall rate of earningsretention is inconsistent with the company’s capital needs and overall financial condition. The ability of a holding company to pay dividends may be restricted if asubsidiary bank becomes undercapitalized. The policy statement also states that a holding company should inform the Federal Reserve Board supervisory staff priorto redeeming or repurchasing common stock or perpetual preferred stock if the holding company is experiencing financial weaknesses or if the repurchase orredemption would result in a net reduction, as of the end of a quarter, in the amount of such equity instruments outstanding compared with the beginning of thequarter in which the redemption or repurchase occurred. These regulatory policies may affect the ability of Waterstone Financial to pay dividends, repurchase sharesof common stock or otherwise engage in capital distributions.Holding Company DividendsWaterstone Financial will not be permitted to pay dividends on its common stock if its stockholders’ equity would be reduced below the amount of theliquidation account established by Waterstone Financial in connection with the conversion. The source of dividends will depend on the net proceeds retained byWaterstone Financial and earnings thereon, and dividends from WaterStone Bank. In addition, Waterstone Financial will be subject to relevant state corporate lawlimitations and federal bank regulatory policy on the payment of dividends. Maryland law, which is the state of Waterstone Financial's incorporation, generally limitsdividends if the corporation would not be able to pay its debts in the usual course of business after giving effect to the dividend or if the corporation’s total assetswould be less than the corporation’s total liabilities plus the amount needed to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of stockholders whose preferentialrights on dissolution are superior to those receiving the distribution.The dividend rate and continued payment of dividends will depend on a number of factors, including our capital requirements, our financial condition andresults of operations, tax considerations, statutory and regulatory limitations, and general economic conditions.Federal Securities Laws RegulationSecurities Exchange Act. Waterstone Financial common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Waterstone Financial is subjectto the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Shares of common stock purchased by persons who are not affiliates of Waterstone Financial may be resold without registration. Shares purchased by anaffiliate of Waterstone Financial are subject to the resale restrictions of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933. If Waterstone Financial meets the current publicinformation requirements of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, each affiliate of Waterstone Financial that complies with the other conditions of Rule 144,including those that require the affiliate’s sale to be aggregated with those of other persons, would be able to sell in the public market, without registration, a numberof shares not to exceed, in any three-month period, the greater of 1% of the outstanding shares of Waterstone Financial, or the average weekly volume of trading inthe shares during the preceding four calendar weeks. In the future, Waterstone Financial may permit affiliates to have their shares registered for sale under theSecurities Act of 1933.Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is intended to improve corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties foraccounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosurespursuant to the securities laws. We have policies, procedures and systems designed to comply with these regulations, and we review and document such policies,procedures and systems to ensure continued compliance with these regulations.- 26 -Change in Control RegulationsUnder the Change in Bank Control Act, no person may acquire control of a savings and loan holding company such as Waterstone Financial unless theFederal Reserve Board has been given 60 days’ prior written notice and has not issued a notice disapproving the proposed acquisition, taking into considerationcertain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer and the competitive effects of the acquisition. Control, as defined under federal law,means ownership, control of or holding irrevocable proxies representing more than 25% of any class of voting stock, control in any manner of the election of amajority of the institution’s directors, or a determination by the regulator that the acquiror has the power, directly or indirectly, to exercise a controlling influence overthe management or policies of the institution. Acquisition of more than 10% of any class of a savings and loan holding company’s voting stock constitutes arebuttable determination of control under the regulations under certain circumstances including where, as is the case with Waterstone Financial, the issuer hasregistered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.In addition, federal regulations provide that no company may acquire control of a savings and loan holding company without the prior approval of theFederal Reserve Board. Any company that acquires such control becomes a “savings and loan holding company” subject to registration, examination and regulationby the Federal Reserve Board.Federal and State TaxationFederal TaxationGeneral. Waterstone Financial and subsidiaries are subject to federal income taxation in the same general manner as other corporations, with someexceptions discussed below. Waterstone Financial and subsidiaries constitute an affiliated group of corporations and, therefore, are eligible to report their income ona consolidated basis. The following discussion of federal taxation is intended only to summarize certain pertinent federal income tax matters and is not acomprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to Waterstone Financial or WaterStone Bank. The company is no longer subject to federal tax examinations foryears before 2014.Method of Accounting. For federal income tax purposes, Waterstone Financial currently reports its income and expenses on the accrual method ofaccounting and uses a tax year ending December 31 for filing its federal income tax returns.Bad Debt Reserves. Prior to the Small Business Protection Act of 1996 (the "1996 Act"), WaterStone Bank was permitted to establish a reserve for bad debtsand to make annual additions to the reserve. These additions could, within specified formula limits, be deducted in arriving at our taxable income. As a result of the1996 Act, WaterStone Bank was required to use the specific charge-off method in computing its bad debt deduction beginning with its 1996 federal tax return. Savingsinstitutions were required to recapture any excess reserves over those established as of December 31, 1987 (base year reserve). At December 31, 2018, WaterStoneBank had no reserves subject to recapture in excess of its base year.Waterstone Financial is required to use the specific charge-off method to account for tax bad debt deductions.Taxable Distributions and Recapture. Prior to 1996, bad debt reserves created prior to 1988 were subject to recapture into taxable income if WaterStone Bankfailed to meet certain thrift asset and definitional tests or made certain distributions. Tax law changes in 1996 eliminated thrift-related recapture rules. However, undercurrent law, pre-1988 tax bad debt reserves remain subject to recapture if WaterStone Bank makes certain non-dividend distributions, repurchases any of its commonstock, pays dividends in excess of earnings and profits, or fails to qualify as a “bank” for tax purposes. At December 31, 2018, our total federal pre-base year bad debtreserve was approximately $16.7 million.Corporate Dividends-Received Deduction. Waterstone Financial may exclude from its federal taxable income 100% of dividends received from WaterStoneBank as a wholly-owned subsidiary by filing consolidated tax returns. The corporate dividends-received deduction is 80% when the corporation receiving thedividend owns at least 20% of the stock of the distributing corporation. The dividends-received deduction is 70% when the corporation receiving the dividend ownsless than 20% of the distributing corporation.State TaxationThe Company is subject to primarily the Wisconsin corporate franchise (income) tax and taxation in a number of states due primarily to the operations of themortgage banking segment. Under current law, the state of Wisconsin imposes a corporate franchise tax of 7.9% on the combined taxable incomes of the members ofour consolidated income tax group.The Company is no longer subject to state income tax examinations by certain state tax authorities for years before 2014.As a Maryland business corporation, Waterstone Financial is required to file an annual report and pay franchise taxes to the state of Maryland.- 27 -Item 1A. Risk FactorsAn investment in our securities is subject to risks inherent in our business and the industry in which we operate. Before making an investment decision, youshould carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and all other information included in this report. The risks described below may adversely affectour business, financial condition and operating results. In addition to these risks and the other risks and uncertainties described in Item 1, “Business-Forward LookingStatements” and Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” there may be additional risks and uncertaintiesthat are not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or operatingresults. The value or market price of our securities could decline due to any of these identified or other risks. Past financial performance may not be a reliable indicatorof future performance, and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods.We operate in a highly regulated environment and we are subject to supervision, examination and enforcement action by various bank regulatory agencies.We are subject to extensive supervision, regulation, and examination by the WDFI, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Federal ReserveBoard. As a result, we are limited in the manner in which we conduct our business, undertake new investments and activities, and obtain financing. This system ofregulation is designed primarily for the protection of the Deposit Insurance Fund and our depositors, and not for the benefit of our stockholders. Under this systemof regulation, the regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory, enforcement, rulemaking and examination activities andpolicies, including rules or policies that: establish minimum capital levels; restrict the timing and amount of dividend payments; govern the classification of assets;determine the adequacy of loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes; and establish the timing and amounts of assessments and fees.Moreover, as part of their examination authority, the banking regulators assign numerical ratings to banks and savings institutions relating to capital, assetquality, management, liquidity, earnings and other factors. These ratings are inherently subjective and the receipt of a less than satisfactory rating in one or morecategories may result in enforcement action by the banking regulators against a financial institution. A less than satisfactory rating may also prevent a financialinstitution, such as WaterStone Bank or its holding company, from obtaining necessary regulatory approvals to access the capital markets, paying dividends,acquiring other financial institutions or establishing new branches.In addition, we must comply with significant anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism laws and regulations, Community Reinvestment Act laws andregulations, and fair lending laws and regulations. Government agencies have the authority to impose monetary penalties and other sanctions on institutions that failto comply with these laws and regulations, which could significantly affect our business activities, including our ability to acquire other financial institutions orexpand our branch network.Changing interest rates may have a negative effect on our results of operations.Our earnings and cash flows are dependent on our net interest income and income from our mortgage banking operations. Interest rates are highly sensitiveto many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular,the Federal Reserve Board. Changes in market interest rates could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.Decreases in interest rates often result in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities, as borrowers refinance their loans to reduceborrowings costs. Under these circumstances, we are subject to reinvestment risk to the extent we are unable to reinvest the cash received from such prepayments inloans or other investments that have interest rates that are comparable to the interest rates on existing loans and securities.Increases in interest rates can also have an adverse impact on our results of operations. A portion of our loans have adjustable interest rates. While thehigher payment amounts we would receive on these loans in a rising interest rate environment may increase our interest income, some borrowers may be unable toafford the higher payment amounts, which may result in a higher rate of loan delinquencies and defaults, as well as lower loan originations, as borrowers who mayqualify for a loan based on certain mortgage repayments, may not be able to afford repayments based on higher interest rates for the same loan amounts. Themarketability of the underlying collateral also may be adversely affected in a high interest rate environment.Although we have implemented asset and liability management strategies designed to reduce the effects of changes in interest rates on our results ofoperations, any substantial, unexpected, prolonged change in market interest rate could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results ofoperations. Also, our interest rate models and assumptions likely may not fully predict or capture the impact of actual interest rate changes on our balance sheet.See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Management of Market Risk.”We rely heavily on certificates of deposit, which has increased our cost of funds and could continue to do so in the future.Our reliance on certificates of deposit to fund our operations has resulted in a higher cost of funds than would otherwise be the case if we had a higherpercentage of demand deposits, savings deposits and money market accounts. In addition, if our certificates of deposit do not remain with us, we may be required toaccess other sources of funds, including loan sales, other types of deposits, including replacement certificates of deposit, securities sold under agreements torepurchase, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago and other borrowings. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rateson such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on our certificates of deposit.- 28 -We intend to increase our commercial business lending, and we intend to continue our commercial real estate and multi-family residential real estate lending,which may expose us to increased lending risks and have a negative effect on our results of operations.We continue to focus on originating commercial business, commercial real estate and multi-family residential real estate loans. These types of loans generallyhave a higher risk of loss compared to our one- to four-family residential real estate loans. Commercial business loans may expose us to greater credit risk than loanssecured by residential real estate because the collateral securing these loans may not be sold as easily as residential real estate. In addition, commercial business andcommercial real estate loans may also involve relatively large loan balances to individual borrowers or groups of borrowers. These loans also have greater credit riskthan residential real estate loans as repayment is generally dependent upon the successful operation of the borrower’s business. Also, the collateral underlyingcommercial business loans may fluctuate in value. Some of our commercial business loans are collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable or otherbusiness assets, and the liquidation of collateral in the event of default is often an insufficient source of repayment because accounts receivable may be uncollectibleand inventories may be obsolete or of limited use. Multi-family residential real estate and commercial real estate loans involve increased risk because repayment isdependent on income being generated in amounts sufficient to cover property maintenance and debt service. In addition, if loans that are collateralized by real estatebecome troubled and the value of the real estate has been significantly impaired, then we may not be able to recover the full contractual amount of principal andinterest that we anticipated at the time we originated the loan, which could cause us to increase our provision for loan losses and adversely affect our financialcondition and results of operations.Consumers may decide to use alternative options to complete financial transactions.Technology is allowing parties to complete financial transactions through alternative methods that historically have involved banks. Consumers can noweasily access historically banking needs through online banking accounts, brokerage accounts, mutual funds or general-purpose reloadable prepaid cards. Consumerscan also complete certain transactions without the assistance of banks.The removal of banking with financial transactions could result in the loss of customer loans, customer deposits, and the related fee income generated from thoseloans and deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost of deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on our financialcondition and results of operations.Secondary mortgage market conditions could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.Our mortgage banking operations provide a significant portion of our non-interest income. In addition to being affected by interest rates, the secondarymortgage markets are also subject to investor demand for residential mortgage loans and increased investor yield requirements for these loans. These conditions mayfluctuate or worsen in the future. In light of current conditions, there is greater risk in retaining mortgage loans pending their sale to investors. We believe our abilityto retain fixed-rate residential mortgage loans is limited. As a result, a prolonged period of secondary market illiquidity may reduce our loan production volumes andcould have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.Changes in the programs offered by secondary market purchasers or our ability to qualify for their programs may reduce our mortgage banking revenues, whichwould negatively impact our non-interest income.We generate mortgage revenues primarily from gains on the sale of single-family mortgage loans pursuant to programs currently offered by Fannie Mae,Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae and non-GSE investors. These entities account for a substantial portion of the secondary market in residential mortgage loans. Any futurechanges in these programs, our eligibility to participate in such programs, the criteria for loans to be accepted or laws that significantly affect the activity of suchentities could, in turn, materially adversely affect our results of operations. A protracted government shutdown may result in reduced loan originations and related gains on sale and could negatively affect our financial condition and resultsof operations.Our mortgage banking operations provide a significant portion of our non-interest income. During any protracted federal government shutdown, we may notbe able to close certain loans and we may not be able to recognize non-interest income on the sale of loans. Some of the loans we originate are sold directly togovernment agencies, and some of these sales may be unable to be consummated during the shutdown. In addition, we believe that some borrowers may determinenot to proceed with their home purchase and not close on their loans, which would result in a permanent loss of the related non-interest income. A federalgovernment shutdown could also result in reduced income for government employees or employees of companies that engage in business with the federalgovernment, which could result in greater loan delinquencies, increases in our nonperforming, criticized and classified assets and a decline in demand for our productsand services.If we are required to repurchase mortgage loans that we have previously sold, it would negatively affect our earnings.One of our primary business operations is our mortgage banking, which involves originating residential mortgage loans for sale in the secondary marketunder agreements that contain representations and warranties related to, among other things, the origination and characteristics of the mortgage loans. We may berequired to repurchase mortgage loans that we have sold in cases of borrower default or breaches of these representations and warranties. If we are required torepurchase mortgage loans or provide indemnification or other recourse, this could increase our costs and thereby affect our future earnings.- 29 -Recent regulations could restrict our ability to originate and sell loans.The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has issued a rule designed to clarify for lenders how they can avoid legal liability under the Dodd-Frank Act,which would hold lenders accountable for ensuring a borrower’s ability to repay a mortgage. Loans that meet this “qualified mortgage” definition will be presumed tohave complied with the new ability-to-repay standard. Under the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s rule, a “qualified mortgage” loan must not contain certainspecified features, including: ●excessive upfront points and fees (those exceeding 3% of the total loan amount, less “bona fide discount points” for prime loans); ●interest-only payments; ●negative-amortization; and ●terms longer than 30 yearsAlso, to qualify as a “qualified mortgage,” a borrower’s total monthly debt-to-income ratio may not exceed 43%. Lenders must also verify and document theincome and financial resources relied upon to qualify the borrower for the loan and underwrite the loan based on a fully amortizing payment schedule and maximuminterest rate during the first five years, taking into account all applicable taxes, insurance and assessments.In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act requires the regulatory agencies to issue regulations that require securitizers of loans to retain not less than 5% of the creditrisk for any asset that is not a “qualified residential mortgage.”Furthermore, the Dodd-Frank Act requires the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau to adopt rules and publish forms that combine certain disclosures thatconsumers receive in connection with applying for and closing on certain mortgage loans under the Truth in Lending Act and the Real Estate Settlement ProceduresAct. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has implemented a final rule to implement this requirement, and the final rule was effective in October 2015.We currently sell in the secondary market the significant majority of the one- to four-family residential real estate loans that we originate. These finalrules could have a significant effect on the secondary market for loans and the types of loans we originate, and restrict our ability to make loans, any of which couldlimit our growth or profitability.Changes in economic conditions could adversely affect our earnings, as our borrowers’ ability to repay loans and the value of the collateral securing our loansdecline. Economic conditions have an impact, to some extent, on our overall performance. Conditions such as an economic recession, rising unemployment,changes in interest rates, money supply and other factors beyond our control may adversely affect our asset quality, deposit levels and loan demand and, therefore,our earnings. Because a majority of our loans are secured by real estate, decreases in real estate values could adversely affect the value of property used as collateral.Adverse changes in the economy may also have a negative effect on the ability of our borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans, which could have anadverse impact on our earnings. Consequently, declines in the economy in our market area could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and resultsof operations.Legal and regulatory proceedings and related matters could adversely affect us or the financial services industry in general.We, and other participants in the financial services industry upon whom we rely to operate, have been and may in the future become involved in legal andregulatory proceedings. Most of the proceedings we consider to be in the normal course of our business or typical for the industry; however, it is inherently difficultto assess the outcome of these matters, and other participants in the financial services industry or we may not prevail in any proceeding or litigation. Any litigation or regulatory proceeding could entail substantial costs and divert management’s attention away from our operations, and any adversedetermination could have a materially adverse effect on our business, brand or image, or our financial condition and results of our operations.We are currently a defendant in two class action lawsuits alleging that Waterstone Mortgage Corporation violated certain provisions of the Fair LaborStandards Act. Although we intend to vigorously defend our interests in this matter and pursue all possible defenses against the claims, we may ultimately berequired to pay significant damages and attorney fees, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. See Item 3, “LegalProceedings,” for more information.If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our results of operations would be negatively affected.In determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses, we analyze our loss and delinquency experience by loan categories and we consider the effect ofexisting economic conditions. In addition, we make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthinessof our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. If the results of our analyses areincorrect, our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, which would require additions to our allowance and woulddecrease our net income. Our emphasis on loan growth and on increasing our portfolio of commercial real estate loans, as well as any future credit deterioration, couldrequire us to increase our allowance further in the future.- 30 -The Financial Accounting Standards Board has adopted a new accounting standard that will be effective for us for our first fiscal year after December 15,2019. This standard, referred to as Current Expected Credit Loss, or CECL, will require financial institutions to determine periodic estimates of lifetime expected creditlosses on loans, and recognize the expected credit losses as allowances for loan losses. This will change the current method of providing allowances for loan lossesthat are probable, which may require us to increase our allowance for loan losses, and to greatly increase the types of data we would need to collect and review todetermine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses. Any resulting increase in our allowance for loan losses or expenses incurred to determine theappropriate level of the allowance for loan losses may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.In addition, bank regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to increase our provision for loan losses or recognize furtherloan charge-offs. Any increase in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory authorities may have a material adverse effect onour results of operations and financial condition.Because most of our borrowers are located in the Milwaukee, Wisconsin metropolitan area, a prolonged downturn in the local economy, or a decline in local realestate values, could cause an increase in nonperforming loans or a decrease in loan demand, which would reduce our profits.Substantially all of our loans are secured by real estate located in our primary market area. Weakness in our local economy and our local real estate marketscould adversely affect the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans and the value of the collateral securing our loans, which could adversely affect our results ofoperations. Real estate values are affected by various factors, including supply and demand, changes in general or regional economic conditions, interest rates,governmental rules or policies and natural disasters. Weakness in economic conditions also could result in reduced loan demand and a decline in loan originations. Inparticular, a significant decline in real estate values would likely lead to a decrease in new loan originations and increased delinquencies and defaults by ourborrowers.Strong competition within our market areas may limit our growth and profitability.Competition in the banking and financial services industry is intense. In our market areas, we compete with commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgagebrokerage firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, money market funds, insurance companies, and brokerage firms operating locally and elsewhere. Some of our competitors have greater name recognition and market presence and offer certain services that we do not or cannot provide, all of which benefit them inattracting business. In addition, larger competitors may be able to price loans and deposits more aggressively than we do.We may not be able to attract and retain skilled people. Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and retain skilled people. Competition for the best people in most activities engaged in by us canbe intense, and we may not be able to hire sufficiently skilled people or to retain them. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of our key personnel could havea material adverse impact on our business because of their skills, knowledge of our markets, years of industry experience, and the difficulty of promptly findingqualified replacement personnel.Loss of key employees may disrupt relationships with certain customers.Our business is primarily relationship-driven in that many of our key employees have extensive customer relationships. Loss of a key employee with suchcustomer relationships may lead to the loss of business if the customers were to follow that employee to a competitor. While we believe our relationship with our keypersonnel is good, we cannot guarantee that all of our key personnel will remain with our organization. Loss of such key personnel, should they enter into anemployment relationship with one of our competitors, could result in the loss of some of our customers.Non-compliance with the USA PATRIOT Act, Bank Secrecy Act, or other laws and regulations could result in fines or sanctions.The USA PATRIOT and Bank Secrecy Acts require financial institutions to develop programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for moneylaundering and terrorist activities. If such activities are detected, financial institutions are obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the U.S. Treasury’s Officeof Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. These rules require financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of customersseeking to open new financial accounts. Failure to comply with these regulations could result in fines or sanctions. During the last year, several banking institutionshave received large fines for non-compliance with these laws and regulations. While we have developed policies and procedures designed to assist in compliancewith these laws and regulations, these policies and procedures may not be effective in preventing violations of these laws and regulations.Monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.In addition to being affected by general economic conditions, our earnings and growth are affected by the policies of the Federal Reserve Board. Animportant function of the Federal Reserve Board is to regulate the money supply and credit conditions. Among the instruments used by the Federal Reserve Board toimplement these objectives are open market purchases and sales of U.S. government securities, adjustments of the discount rate and changes in banks’ reserverequirements against bank deposits. These instruments are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic growth and the distribution of credit, bankrequirements against bank deposits. These instruments are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic growth and the distribution of credit, bankloans, investments and deposits. Their use also affects interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits.- 31 -We are subject to the Community Reinvestment Act and fair lending laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to material penalties.The Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act and other fair lending laws and regulations imposenondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. A successful regulatory challenge to an institution’s performance under the CRA or fair lending lawsand regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including the required payment of damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, imposition ofrestrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity and restrictions on expansion. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s performanceunder fair lending laws in private class action litigation. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results ofoperations.We may be adversely affected by recent changes in U.S. tax laws.Changes in tax laws contained in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was enacted in December 2017, include a number of provisions that will have an impact onthe banking industry, borrowers and the market for single-family residential real estate. Changes include (i) a lower limit on the deductibility of mortgage interest onsingle-family residential mortgage loans, (ii) the elimination of interest deductions for home equity loans, (iii) a limitation on the deductibility of business interestexpense and (iv) a limitation on the deductibility of property taxes and state and local income taxes. The recent changes in the tax laws may have an adverse effect onthe market for, and valuation of, residential properties, and on the demand for such loans in the future, and could make it harder for borrowers to make their loanpayments. If home ownership becomes less attractive, demand for mortgage loans could decrease. The value of the properties securing loans in our loan portfoliomay be adversely impacted as a result of the changing economics of home ownership, which could require an increase in our provision for loan losses, which wouldreduce our profitability and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The mortgage banking originations may beadversely impacted as a result of changing economics of home ownership, which could also reduce profitability of our business, financial condition and results ofoperations.Changes in our accounting policies or in accounting standards could materially affect how we report our financial condition and results of operations.Our accounting policies are essential to understanding our financial condition and results of operations. Some of these policies require the use of estimatesand assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. Some of our accounting policies are critical because they requiremanagement to make difficult, subjective, and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain, and because it is likely that materially different amountswould be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. If such estimates or assumptions underlying our financial statements are incorrect, wemay experience material losses.From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission change the financial accounting and reportingstandards or the interpretation of those standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. These changes are beyond our control, can be hard topredict and could materially affect how we report our financial condition and results of operations. We could also be required to apply a new or revised standardretroactively, which may result in our restating our prior period financial statements.We may be required to transition from the use of LIBOR in the future.On July 27, 2017, the Chief Executive of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to stoppersuading or compelling banks to submit rates for the calibration of LIBOR to the administrator of LIBOR after 2021. The announcement indicates that thecontinuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. It is impossible to predict whether and to what extent banks will continue toprovide LIBOR submissions to the administrator of LIBOR or whether any additional reforms to LIBOR may be enacted in the United Kingdom or elsewhere. At thistime, no consensus exists as to what rate or rates may become acceptable alternatives to LIBOR and it is impossible to predict the effect of any such alternatives onthe value of LIBOR-based securities and variable rate loans, subordinated debentures, or other securities or financial arrangements, given LIBOR's role in determiningmarket interest rates globally. Uncertainty as to the nature of alternative reference rates and as to potential changes or other reforms to LIBOR may adversely affectLIBOR rates and the value of LIBOR-based loans and securities in our portfolio, and may impact the availability and cost of hedging instruments and borrowings. Ouradjustable-rate [mortgage] loans are generally tied to the LIBOR. If LIBOR rates are no longer available, and we are required to implement substitute indices for thecalculation of interest rates under our loan agreements with our borrowers, we may incur expenses in effecting the transition, and may be subject to disputes orlitigation with customers over the appropriateness or comparability to LIBOR of the substitute indices, which could have an adverse effect on our results ofoperations.The need to account for certain assets at estimated fair value may adversely affect our results of operations.We report certain assets, such as loans held for sale, at estimated fair value. Generally, for assets that are reported at fair value, we use quoted market pricesor valuation models that utilize observable market inputs to estimate fair value. Because we carry these assets on our books at their estimated fair value, we may incurlosses even if the asset in question presents minimal credit risk.- 32 -Changes in the valuation of our securities portfolio could adversely affect our profits.Our securities portfolio may be impacted by fluctuations in market value, potentially reducing accumulated other comprehensive income and/or earnings. Fluctuations in market value may be caused by changes in market interest rates, lower market prices for securities and limited investor demand. Managementevaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a monthly basis, with more frequent evaluation for selected issues. In analyzing a debt issuer’s financialcondition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies haveoccurred, industry analysts’ reports and, to a lesser extent given the relatively insignificant levels of depreciation in our debt portfolio, spread differentials betweenthe effective rates on instruments in the portfolio compared to risk-free rates. In analyzing an equity issuer’s financial condition, management considers industryanalysts’ reports, financial performance and projected target prices of investment analysts within a one-year time frame. If this evaluation shows impairment to theactual or projected cash flows associated with one or more securities, a potential loss to earnings may occur. Changes in interest rates can also have an adverse effecton our financial condition, as our available-for-sale securities are reported at their estimated fair value, and therefore are impacted by fluctuations in interest rates. Weincrease or decrease our stockholders’ equity by the amount of change in the estimated fair value of the available-for-sale securities, net of taxes. The declines inmarket value could result in other-than-temporary impairments of these assets, which would lead to accounting charges that could have a material adverse effect onour net income and capital levels.Because the nature of the financial services business involves a high volume of transactions, we face significant operational risks.We operate in diverse markets and rely on the ability of our employees and systems to process a high number of transactions. Operational risk is the risk ofloss resulting from our operations, including but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside our company, the execution of unauthorizedtransactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements, andbusiness continuation and disaster recovery. Insurance coverage may not be available for such losses, or where available, such losses may exceed insurance limits.This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicableregulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential negative publicity. In the event of a breakdown inthe internal control system, improper operation of systems or improper employee actions, we could suffer financial loss, face regulatory action, and suffer damage toour reputation.Risks associated with system failures, interruptions, or breaches of cybersecurity could negatively affect our earnings.Information technology systems are critical to our business. We use various technology systems to manage our customer relationships, general ledger,securities investments, deposits and loans. We have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit the effect of system failures, interruptions, and securitybreaches, but such events may still occur or may not be adequately addressed if they do occur. Although we take numerous protective measures and otherwiseendeavor to protect and maintain the privacy and security of confidential data, these systems may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses, othermalicious code, cyber-attacks, cyber-theft and other events that could have a security impact. If one or more of such events were to occur, this potentially couldjeopardize confidential and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our systems or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our orour customers' operations.In addition, we outsource a majority of our data processing to certain third-party providers. If these third-party providers encounter difficulties, or if we havedifficulty communicating with them, our ability to adequately process and account for transactions could be affected, and our business operations could be adverselyaffected. Threats to information security also exist in the processing of customer information through various other vendors and their personnel.The occurrence of any system failures, interruption, or breach of security could damage our reputation and result in a loss of customers and business,subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to litigation and possible financial liability. We may be required to expend significant additional resources tomodify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures, and we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that are notfully covered by our insurance. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.- 33 -Our risk management framework may not be effective in mitigating risk and reducing the potential for significant losses.Our risk management framework is designed to minimize risk and loss to us. We seek to identify, measure, monitor, report and control our exposure to risk,including strategic, market, liquidity, compliance and operational risks. While we use a broad and diversified set of risk monitoring and mitigation techniques, thesetechniques are inherently limited because they cannot anticipate the existence or future development of currently unanticipated or unknown risks. Recent economicconditions and heightened legislative and regulatory scrutiny of the financial services industry, among other developments, have increased our level of risk.Accordingly, we could suffer losses as a result of our failure to properly anticipate and manage these risks.Our business may be adversely affected by an increasing prevalence of fraud and other financial crimes.Our loans to businesses and individuals and our deposit relationships and related transactions are subject to exposure to the risk of loss due to fraud andother financial crimes. We have experienced losses due to apparent fraud and other financial crimes. While we have policies and procedures designed to preventsuch losses, losses may still occur.Acquisitions may disrupt our business and dilute stockholder value.We regularly evaluate merger and acquisition opportunities with other financial institutions and financial services companies. As a result, negotiations maytake place and future mergers or acquisitions involving cash, debt, or equity securities may occur at any time. We would seek acquisition partners that offer us eithersignificant market presence or the potential to expand our market footprint and improve profitability through economies of scale or expanded services. Acquiring other banks, businesses, or branches may have an adverse effect on our financial results and may involve various other risks commonlyassociated with acquisitions, including, among other things: ●difficulty in estimating the value of the target company; ●payment of a premium over book and market values that may dilute our tangible book value and earnings per share in the short and long term; ●potential exposure to unknown or contingent tax or other liabilities of the target company; ●exposure to potential asset quality problems of the target company; ●potential volatility in reported income associated with goodwill impairment losses; ●difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and personnel of the target company; ●inability to realize the expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, and/or other projected benefits; ●potential disruption to our business; ●potential diversion of our management’s time and attention; ●the possible loss of key employees and customers of the target company; and ●potential changes in banking or tax laws or regulations that may affect the target company. Various factors may make takeover attempts more difficult to achieve.Our articles of incorporation and bylaws, federal regulations, Maryland law, shares of restricted stock and stock options that we have granted or may grantto employees and directors and stock ownership by our management and directors, and various other factors may make it more difficult for companies or persons toacquire control of Waterstone Financial without the consent of our board of directors. A shareholder may want a takeover attempt to succeed because, for example, apotential acquiror could offer a premium over the then prevailing price of our common stock. Legal and regulatory proceedings and related matters could adversely affect us or the financial services industry in general.We, and other participants in the financial services industry upon whom we rely to operate, have been and may in the future become involved in legal andregulatory proceedings. Most of the proceedings we consider to be in the normal course of our business or typical for the industry; however, it is inherently difficultto assess the outcome of these matters, and other participants in the financial services industry or we may not prevail in any proceeding or litigation. There could besubstantial cost and management diversion in such litigation and proceedings, and any adverse determination could have a materially adverse effect on our business,brand or image, or our financial condition and results of our operations.Our funding sources may prove insufficient to replace deposits at maturity and support our future growth.We must maintain sufficient funds to respond to the needs of depositors and borrowers. As a part of our liquidity management, we use a number of fundingsources in addition to core deposit growth and repayments and maturities of loans and investments. As we continue to grow, we are likely to become more dependenton these sources, which may include Federal Home Loan Bank advances, proceeds from the sale of loans, federal funds purchased and brokered certificates ofdeposit. Adverse operating results or changes in industry conditions could lead to difficulty or an inability to access these additional funding sources. Our financialflexibility will be severely constrained if we are unable to maintain our access to funding or if adequate financing is not available to accommodate future growth atacceptable interest rates. If we are required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to support future growth, our revenues may not increaseproportionately to cover our costs. In this case, our operating margins and profitability would be adversely affected.- 34 -We are subject to environmental liability risk associated with lending activities.A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate, and we could become subject to environmental liabilities with respect to one or more ofthese properties. During the ordinary course of business, we may foreclose on and take title to properties securing defaulted loans. In doing so, there is a risk thathazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous conditions or toxic substances are found on these properties, we may be liable forremediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage, civil fines and criminal penalties regardless of when the hazardous conditions or toxicsubstances first affected any particular property. Environmental laws may require us to incur substantial expenses to address unknown liabilities and may materiallyreduce the affected property’s value or limit our ability to use or sell the affected property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcementpolicies with respect to existing laws may increase our exposure to environmental liability. Although we have policies and procedures to perform an environmentalreview before initiating any foreclosure action on nonresidential real property, these reviews may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. Theremediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on us.Item 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsNoneItem 2. PropertiesWe operate from our corporate center, our 11 full-service banking offices, our drive-through office and 11 automated teller machines, located in Milwaukee,Washington and Waukesha Counties, Wisconsin. In addition, we operate a loan production office in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The net book value of our premises,land, equipment and leasehold improvements was $24.5 million at December 31, 2018. The following table sets forth information with respect to our corporate centerand our full-service banking offices as of December 31, 2018.Corporate Center11200 West Plank CourtWauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226Wauwatosa7500 West State StreetWauwatosa, Wisconsin 53213Brookfield (1)17495 W Capitol Dr.Brookfield, Wisconsin 53045 Franklin/Hales Corners6555 South 108th StreetFranklin, Wisconsin 53132Germantown/Menomonee FallsW188N9820 Appleton AvenueGermantown, Wisconsin 53022Oak Creek6560 South 27th StreetOak Creek, Wisconsin 53154 Oconomowoc/Lake Country (1)1233 Corporate Center DriveOconomowoc, Wisconsin 53066Pewaukee1230 George Towne DrivePewaukee, Wisconsin 53072Waukesha/Brookfield21505 East Moreland Blvd.Waukesha, Wisconsin 53186 West Allis10101 West Greenfield AvenueWest Allis, Wisconsin 53214Fox Point8607 North Port Washington RoadFox Point, Wisconsin 53217Greenfield5000 West Loomis RoadGreenfield, Wisconsin 53220 Commercial Real Estate Loan Production Office (1)333 Washington Avenue NorthSuite 304Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (1)Leased propertyIn addition to our banking offices, as of December 31, 2018, Waterstone Mortgage Corporation had 11 offices in each of Wisconsin and Florida, eight officesin each of Pennsylvania and New Mexico, six offices in Minnesota, four offices in Ohio and Texas, three offices in Michigan, two offices in each of Arizona, California,Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, New Hampshire, Oregon, and Virginia, and one office in each of Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Nebraska, North Carolina and Oklahoma.- 35 -Item 3. Legal ProceedingsWaterStone Bank and its wholly owned subsidiary, Waterstone Mortgage Corporation are involved in various legal actions arising in the normal course ofbusiness, including the proceedings specifically discussed below. While the ultimate outcome of pending proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, it is theopinion of management, after consultation with counsel representing us in such proceedings, that the resolution of these proceedings will not have a material adverseeffect on our consolidated financial position or results of operation.Herrington et al. v. Waterstone Mortgage CorporationWaterstone Mortgage Corporation is a defendant in a class action lawsuit that was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin andsubsequently compelled to arbitration before the American Arbitration Association. The plaintiff class alleged that Waterstone Mortgage Corporation violated certainprovisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and failed to pay loan officers consistent with their employment agreements. On July 5, 2017, the arbitrator issued aFinal Award finding Waterstone Mortgage Corporation liable for unpaid minimum wages, overtime, unreimbursed business expenses, and liquidated damages underthe FLSA. On December 8, 2017, the District Court confirmed the award in large part, and entered a judgment against Waterstone in the amount of $7,267,919 indamages to Claimants, $3,298,851 in attorney fees and costs, and a $20,000 incentive fee to Plaintiff Herrington, plus post-judgment interest. On February 12, 2018, theDistrict Court awarded post-arbitration fees and costs of approximately $98,000. The judgment was appealed by Waterstone to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals,where oral argument was held on May 29, 2018. On October 22, 2018, the Seventh Circuit issued a ruling vacating the District Court's order enforcing the arbitrationaward. If the District Court determines the agreement only allows for individual arbitration, the award would be vacated and the case sent to individual arbitration fora new proceeding. If the District Court determines the arbitration agreement nevertheless allows for collective arbitration, the District Court could confirm the prioraward.On December 28, 2018, Plaintiff filed her post-remand brief. In it, Plaintiff asks the Court to reaffirm the arbitration award entered by Arbitrator Pratt in full.Alternatively, she asked the Court to affirm her individual damage award and the awards of 123 other opt-ins whose arbitration agreements permit joinder or classactions. Lastly, Plaintiff asked the Court to have 154 opt-ins intervene and file an amended complaint for individual relief in court. Waterstone opposed the motion onJanuary 28, 2019, and asked the Court to vacate the prior Final Award in full because Herrington’s arbitration agreement only allows for individual arbitration. Plaintifffiled its reply on February 14, 2019.If the judgment is upheld in full, the Company has estimated that the award, which includes attorney's fees, costs, and interest, could be as high as $11 million.However, Waterstone has meaningful appellate rights and intends to vigorously defend its interests in this matter, including arguing for complete reversal on appeal.Although the Company believes there is a strong basis to vacate the award, there remains a reasonable possibility that the Court's judgment will be affirmed in wholeor in part, with the possible range of loss from $0 to $11 million. We do not believe that the loss is probable at this time, as that term is used in assessing losscontingencies. Accordingly, in accordance with the authoritative guidance in the evaluation of contingencies, the Company has not recorded an accrual related to thismatter.Werner et al. v. Waterstone Mortgage CorporationWaterstone Mortgage Corporation is a defendant in a putative collection action lawsuit that was filed on August 4, 2017 in the United States District Court for theWestern District of Wisconsin, Werner et al. v. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation. Plaintiffs allege that Waterstone Mortgage Corporation violated the Fair LaborStandards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay loan officers minimum and overtime wages. On October 26, 2017, Plaintiffs moved for conditional certification and to providenotice to the putative class. On February 9, 2018, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification and notice.On July 23, 2018, Waterstone filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the claims. It sought to (1) dismiss the time-barred claims of 4 opt-ins and (2) dismiss allother opt-ins due to the denial of conditional certification. In response, all but Werner and Wiesneski filed motions to withdraw their consents to join the case. TheCourt denied the summary judgment motion on the basis that it was moot due to the opt-in plaintiffs voluntarily dismissing their case.On October 17, 2018, Werner and Wiesneski asked the Court to send their claims to arbitration. On December 13, 2018, the Court denied the request, finding they hadwaived their right to arbitrate based on litigating the case in Court for over a year. Thus, the case remained in Court as a two-Plaintiff case.As of February 2019, the parties have reached a settlement in principle to resolve the claims. The amount of the settlement would not have a material impact to thefinancial statements. The parties are working on finalizing the terms of settlement.Item 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresNot applicable- 36 -Part IIItem 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity SecuritiesOur shares of common stock are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market® under the symbol WSBF. The approximate number of shareholders of recordof Waterstone common stock as of February 28, 2019 was 1,400. On that same date there were 28,088,739 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.Following are the Company's monthly common stock repurchases during the fourth quarter of 2018. Period TotalNumber ofSharesPurchased AveragePrice Paidper Share Total Number ofSharesPurchasedas Part ofPubliclyAnnouncedPlans MaximumNumber ofShares thatMayYet BePurchasedUnderthe Plan(a) October 1, 2018 - October 31, 2018 231,700 $16.84 231,700 157,600 November 1, 2018 - November 30, 2018 105,300 16.57 105,300 943,400 December 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 250,700 16.36 250,700 692,700 Total 587,700 $16.59 587,700 692,700 (a) On November 8, 2018, the Board of Directors terminated its existing repurchase plan and authorized the repurchase of 1,000,000 shares of common stock.PERFORMANCE GRAPHSet forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total shareholder return on Waterstone Financial common stock, based on the market price of thecommon stock and assuming reinvestment of cash dividends, with the cumulative total return of companies on the SNL Thrift NASDAQ Index and the Russell 2000.The graph assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2013, in Waterstone Financial, Inc. common stock and each of those indices.Waterstone Financial, Inc.Index12/31/1312/31/1412/31/1512/31/1612/31/1712/31/18Waterstone Financial, Inc.100.00131.76143.45190.42185.82193.27SNL Thrift NASDAQ index100.00110.75126.56160.91159.37139.09Russell 2000100.00104.89100.26121.63139.44124.09- 37 -Item 6. Selected Financial DataThe summary financial information presented below is derived in part from the Company’s audited financial statements, although the table itself is not audited. Thefollowing data should be read together with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis ofFinancial Condition and Results of Operations” later in this report. At or for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 (In Thousands, except per share amounts) Selected Financial Condition Data: Total assets $1,915,381 $1,806,401 $1,790,619 $1,762,729 $1,783,380 Cash and cash equivalents 86,101 48,607 47,217 100,471 172,820 Securities available for sale 185,720 199,707 226,795 269,658 273,443 Loans held for sale 141,616 149,896 225,248 166,516 125,073 Loans receivable 1,379,148 1,291,814 1,177,884 1,114,934 1,094,990 Allowance for loan losses 13,249 14,077 16,029 16,185 18,706 Loans receivable, net 1,365,899 1,277,737 1,161,855 1,098,749 1,076,284 Real estate owned, net 2,152 4,558 6,118 9,190 18,706 Deposits 1,038,495 967,380 949,411 893,361 863,960 Borrowings 435,046 386,285 387,155 441,203 434,000 Total shareholders' equity 399,679 412,104 410,690 391,930 450,237 Selected Operating Data: Interest income $73,700 $67,095 $63,736 $61,963 $63,634 Interest expense 19,523 16,362 20,292 23,119 22,327 Net interest income 54,177 50,733 43,444 38,844 41,307 Provision for loan losses (1,060) (1,166) 380 1,965 1,150 Net interest income after provision for loan losses 55,237 51,899 43,064 36,879 40,157 Noninterest income 118,199 124,413 126,365 104,474 84,568 Noninterest expense 133,156 131,879 127,435 115,534 104,818 Income before income taxes 40,280 44,433 41,994 25,819 19,907 Provision for income taxes 9,526 18,469 16,462 9,249 7,175 Net income $30,754 $25,964 $25,532 $16,570 $12,732 Per common share: Income per share - basic $1.12 $0.95 $0.94 $0.57 $0.38 Income per share - diluted $1.11 $0.93 $0.93 $0.56 $0.38 Book value $14.04 $13.97 $13.95 $13.33 $13.08 Dividends declared $0.98 $0.98 $0.33 $0.20 $0.20 - 38 - At or for the Year Ended December 31, 20182017201620152014Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data: Performance Ratios: Return on average assets1.64 %1.43 %1.45 %0.94%0.71%Return on average equity7.606.326.333.992.89Interest rate spread (1)2.752.692.271.912.03Net interest margin (2)3.093.002.642.362.44Noninterest expense to average assets7.127.297.246.585.82Efficiency ratio (3)77.2575.3075.0580.6183.27Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearingliabilities130.14131.86130.56131.54139.98Dividend payout ratio (4)87.50103.1627.6635.2052.48 Capital Ratios: Waterstone Financial, Inc.: Equity to total assets at end of period20.87 %22.81 %22.94 %22.23 %25.25 %Average equity to average assets21.6322.7022.9023.6224.51Total capital to risk-weighted assets28.2230.7532.2333.4141.25Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets27.3229.7431.0232.1639.99Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets27.3229.7431.0232.16N/ATier 1 capital to average assets21.0622.4323.2022.2024.80WaterStone Bank: Total capital to risk-weighted assets26.9528.9329.5030.9231.98Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets26.0527.9228.2929.6730.73Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets26.0527.9228.2929.67N/ATier I capital to average assets20.0821.1021.1720.4519.04 Asset Quality Ratios: Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans0.96 %1.09 %1.36 %1.45 %1.71 %Allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans202.12231.99162.6291.9449.21Net (recoveries) charge-offs to average outstanding loans duringthe period(0.02)0.060.050.370.55Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans0.480.470.841.583.47Non-performing assets as a percent of total assets0.450.590.891.523.18 Other Data: Number of full-service banking offices111111119Number of full-time equivalent employees888927895770731(1) Represents the difference between the weighted average yield on average interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.(2) Represents net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets.(3) Represents non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income.(4) Represents dividends paid per share divided by basic earnings per share.N/A - Not applicable- 39 -Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOverviewThe following discussion and analysis is presented to assist the reader in understanding and evaluating of the Company's financial condition and results ofoperations. It is intended to complement the consolidated financial statements, footnotes, and supplemental financial data appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K andshould be read in conjunction therewith. The detailed discussion in the sections below focuses on the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018,2017, and 2016 and the financial condition as of December 31, 2018 compared to the financial condition as of December 31, 2017.As described in the notes to consolidated financial statements, we have two reportable segments: community banking and mortgage banking. Thecommunity banking segment provides consumer and business banking products and services to customers. Consumer products include loan products, depositproducts, and personal investment services. Business banking products include loans for working capital, inventory and general corporate use, commercial real estateconstruction loans, and deposit accounts. The mortgage banking segment, which is conducted through Waterstone Mortgage Corporation, consists of originatingresidential mortgage loans primarily for sale in the secondary market.Our community banking segment generates the significant majority of our consolidated net interest income and requires the significant majority of ourprovision for loan losses. Our mortgage banking segment generates the significant majority of our noninterest income and a majority of our noninterest expenses. Wehave provided below a discussion of the material results of operations for each segment on a separate basis for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016,which focuses on noninterest income and noninterest expenses. We have also provided a discussion of the consolidated operations of Waterstone Financial, whichincludes the consolidated operations of WaterStone Bank and Waterstone Mortgage Corporation, for the same periods.Critical Accounting PoliciesCritical accounting policies are those that involve significant judgments and assumptions by management and that have, or could have, a material impact onour income or the carrying value of our assets.Allowance for Loan Losses. WaterStone Bank establishes valuation allowances on loans deemed to be impaired. A loan is considered impaired when, basedon current information and events, it is probable that WaterStone Bank will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loanagreement. A valuation allowance is established for an amount equal to the impairment when the carrying amount of the loan exceeds the present value of theexpected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate or the fair value of the underlying collateral (specific component). The Companyrecognizes the change in present value of expected future cash flows on impaired loans attributable to the passage of time as bad debt expense. On an ongoing basis,at least quarterly for financial reporting purposes, the fair value of collateral dependent impaired loans and real estate owned is determined or reaffirmed by thefollowing procedures: ●Obtaining updated real estate appraisals or performing updated discounted cash flow analysis; ●Confirming that the physical condition of the real estate has not significantly changed since the last valuation date; ●Comparing the estimated current book value to that of updated sales values experienced on similar real estate owned; ●Comparing the estimated current book value to that of updated values seen on more current appraisals of similar properties; and ●Comparing the estimated current book value to that of updated listed sales prices on our real estate owned and that of similar properties (not ownedby the Company).WaterStone Bank also establishes valuation allowances based on an evaluation of the various risk components that are inherent in the credit portfolio(general component). The risk components that are evaluated include past loan loss experience; the level of non-performing and classified assets; current economicconditions; volume, growth, and composition of the loan portfolio; adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay; the estimated value of anyunderlying collateral; regulatory guidance; and other relevant factors. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to earnings and recoveries of previouslycharged-off loans and reduced by charge-offs. Charge-offs approximate the amount by which the outstanding principal balance exceeds the estimated net realizablevalue of the underlying collateral. The appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses is reviewed and approved quarterly by the WaterStone Bank Board ofDirectors. The allowance reflects management’s best estimate of the amount needed to provide for the probable loss on impaired loans and other inherent losses in theloan portfolio, and is based on a risk model developed and implemented by management and approved by the WaterStone Bank Board of Directors.Actual results could differ from this estimate, and future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on unforeseen changes in loan quality andeconomic conditions. More specifically, if our future charge-off experience increases substantially from our past experience, or if the value of underlying loancollateral, in our case mostly real estate, declines in value by a substantial amount, or if unemployment in our primary market area increases significantly, our allowancefor loan losses may be inadequate and we will incur higher provisions for loan losses and lower net income in the future.In addition, state and federal regulators periodically review the WaterStone Bank allowance for loan losses. Such regulators have the authority to requireWaterStone Bank to recognize additions to the allowance at the time of their examination.Income Taxes. The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated federal, combined state income tax, and separate state income tax returns. The provisionfor income taxes is based upon income in the consolidated financial statements, rather than amounts reported on the income tax return. Deferred tax assets andliabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilitiesand their respective tax bases as well as for net operating loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected toapply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of achange in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date. - 40 -Under generally accepted accounting principles, a valuation allowance is required to be recognized if it is “more likely than not” that a deferred tax asset willnot be realized. The determination of the realizability of deferred tax assets is highly subjective and dependent upon judgment concerning management's evaluation ofboth positive and negative evidence, the forecasts of future income, applicable tax planning strategies, and assessments of current and future economic and businessconditions. Examples of positive evidence may include the existence of taxes paid in available carry-back years as well as the probability that taxable income will begenerated in future periods. Examples of negative evidence may include cumulative losses in a current year and prior two years and general business and economictrends.Positions taken in the Company’s tax returns are subject to challenge by the taxing authorities upon examination. The benefit of uncertain tax positions areinitially recognized in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such taxpositions are both initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlementwith the tax authority, assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Interest and penalties on income tax uncertainties are classified within income taxexpense in the income statement.Fair Value Measurements. The Company determines the fair value of its assets and liabilities in accordance with ASC 820. ASC 820 establishes a standardframework for measuring and disclosing fair value under generally accepted accounting principles. A number of valuation techniques are used to determine the fairvalue of assets and liabilities in the Company’s financial statements. The valuation techniques include quoted market prices for investment securities, appraisals ofreal estate from independent licensed appraisers and other valuation techniques. Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities where limited or no observablemarket data exists are based primarily upon estimates, and are often calculated based on the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics of the asset orliability and other factors. Therefore, the valuation results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of theasset or liability. Additionally, there are inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount ratesand estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future values. Significant changes in the aggregate fair value of assets andliabilities required to be measured at fair value or for impairment are recognized in the income statement under the framework established by generally acceptedaccounting principles.Recent Accounting Pronouncements. Refer to Note 1 of our consolidated financial statements for a description of recent accounting pronouncementsincluding the respective dates of adoption and effects on results of operations and financial condition.Comparison of Consolidated Waterstone Financial, Inc. Financial Condition at December 31, 2018 and at December 31, 2017Total Assets. Total assets increased by $109.0 million, or 6.0%, to $1.92 billion at December 31, 2018 from $1.81 billion at December 31, 2017. The increase intotal assets primarily reflects an increase in cash and cash equivalents and loans receivable, partially offset by a decrease in securities available for sale and loansheld for sale. Funding needed for loan originations was provided by deposit growth and additional long-term FHLB debt in 2018.Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents increased $37.5 million to $86.1 million at December 31, 2018 from $48.6 million at December 31,2017. The increase in cash and cash equivalents primarily reflects increases in deposits and long-term FHLB borrowings along with the decrease in securitiesavailable for sale and loans held for sale. Offsetting those increases to cash and cash equivalents, we used cash to fund loans held for investment, pay dividends, andrepurchase shares since December 31, 2017.Securities Available for Sale. Securities available for sale decreased by $14.0 million to $185.7 million at December 31, 2018 from $199.7 million at December31, 2017. The decrease was due to paydowns in mortgage related securities and maturities of debt securities exceeding security purchases during the year.Loans Held for Sale. Loans held for sale decreased $8.3 million, or 5.5%, to $141.6 million at December 31, 2018 from $149.9 million at December 31, 2017. Thedecrease was related to the timing of the fourth quarter fundings and sales to investors, as volumes at the mortgage banking segment remained relatively flat.Loans Receivable. Loans receivable held for investment increased $87.3 million, or 6.8%, to $1.38 billion at December 31, 2018. The increase in total loansreceivable was primarily attributable to increases in the one- to four-family, multi-family, and commercial real estate loan categories. Offsetting those increases, thehome equity, construction and land, commercial, and consumer categories decreased.Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses decreased $828,000 to $13.2 million at December 31, 2018 from $14.1 million at December 31, 2017. The decrease resulted from a negative provision for 2018 due to continued improvement of key loan quality metrics decreasing the allowance related to the loanscollectively and specifically reviewed. The overall decrease was primarily related to the multi-family, construction and land, and commercial categories offset slightlyby an increase to the commercial real estate category. See Note 3 for further discussion on the allowance for loan losses. Federal Home Loan Bank Stock. Total Federal Home Loan Bank stock increased $2.5 million to $19.4 million at December 31, 2018. During the year endedDecember 31, 2018, $11.7 million of stock was purchased when entering into new short-term and long-term FHLB borrowings. A total of $9.2 million of stock was soldas short-term and long-term FHLB borrowings matured and our ownership requirement decreased accordingly.Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance. Total cash surrender value of life insurance increased $1.6 million, to $67.6 million at December 31, 2018. Theincrease related to continued earnings and annual premiums paid offset by a death benefit claimed.Real Estate Owned. Total real estate owned decreased by $2.4 million, or 52.8%, to $2.2 million at December 31, 2018, compared to $4.6 million at December31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2018, $545,000 was transferred from loans to real estate owned upon completion of foreclosure. During the same period,sales of real estate owned totaled $2.6 million. Write-downs totaled $309,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018.- 41 -Deposits. Deposits increased by $71.1 million to $1.04 billion at December 31, 2018, from $967.4 million at December 31, 2017. The increase was driven by anincrease of $46.9 million in time deposits, $14.7 million in money market and savings deposits, and $9.5 million in demand deposits.Borrowings. Total borrowings increased $48.8 million to $435.0 million at December 31, 2018, from $386.3 million at December 31, 2017. The communitybanking segment borrowed a total of $60.0 million additional short and long term borrowings to fund loan growth. External short term borrowings at the mortgagebanking segment decreased a total of $6.2 million at December 31, 2018 from December 31, 2017 due to timing of funding loans held for sale.Shareholders’ Equity. Shareholders’ equity decreased by $12.4 million, or 3.0%, to $399.7 million at December 31, 2018 from $412.1 million at December 31,2017. Shareholders' equity decreased primarily due to the declaration of regular dividends and a special dividend, the repurchase of stock, and the decrease in the fairvalue of the securities portfolio. Partially offsetting the decreases were increases from net income, additional paid in capital as stock options were exercised, andunearned ESOP shares as they continue to vest.Comparison of Community Banking Segment Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017Net income from our community banking segment for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $24.9 million compared to $16.4 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2017. Net interest income increased $4.3 million to $54.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $50.6 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2017 due to an increase in average loan balances and a reduction in our overall cost of borrowing. The long-term borrowings that matured during 2017were replaced with a lower cost mix of funding, including long and short-term borrowings and deposits raised through our retail network. Offsetting those decreases,the cost of deposits increased as interest expense on certificates of deposit increased as maturities repriced in the past year.Provision for loan losses was a negative provision of $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to a negative provision of $1.3 million forthe year ended December 31, 2017.Noninterest income increased $357,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily due to increases in loan fees and a decrease in loss on sale of availablefor sale securities along with slight increases to cash surrender value of life insurance and other income. The loan fees increased primary due to increased prepaymentpenalties. The decrease in loss on sale of available for sale securities resulted from a sale of a municipal bond for a loss of $107,000 in 2017 with no sales in 2018. Cashsurrender value of life insurance increased as the earnings rate increased slightly. Other income increased primarily due to an increase in rental and wealthmanagement income. Compensation, payroll taxes, and other employee benefits expense increased $890,000 due primarily to an increase in health insurance, salaries expense, andvariable compensation offset by lower stock based compensation expenses. Occupancy, office furniture, and equipment increased due primarily to increased snowremoval, maintenance and repair expense, and computer supplies. Advertising expense increased in order to promote our deposit offers. Professional fees increaseddue to consulting expenses throughout the year. Real estate owned expense decreased as there was a decrease in writedowns, decrease in management expense, andan increase in gain on sale of real estate owned. Other noninterest expense decreased resulting from a decrease in loan origination and FDIC assessment expenses.Income tax expense decreased $5.0 million to $7.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily due to a lower federal income taxrate and the deferred tax revaluation in 2017. As a result of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was enacted into law on December 22, 2017, the Company revalued its netdeferred tax asset to reflect the reduction in its federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. This revaluation resulted in a one-time income tax expense ofapproximately $2.7 million during the fourth quarter of 2017.Comparison of Mortgage Banking Segment Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017Net income from our mortgage banking segment decreased $3.8 million to $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $9.6 million for theyear ended December 31, 2017. We originated $2.60 billion in mortgage loans held for sale during the year ended December 31, 2018, which was an increase of $52.2million, or 2.0%, from the $2.55 billion originated during the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase in loan production volume was driven by a 4.1% increase inmortgage purchase products offset by a 14.0% decrease in refinance products. Total mortgage banking income decreased $6.7 million, or 5.5%, to $115.4 million duringthe year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $122.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. Margins decreased approximately 7.9% for the year endedDecember 31, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017.Our overall margin can be affected by the mix of both loan type (conventional loans versus governmental) and loan purpose (purchase versus refinance). Conventional loans include loans that conform to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac standards, whereas governmental loans are those loans guaranteed by the federalgovernment, such as a Federal Housing Authority or U.S. Department of Agriculture loan. Loans originated for the purchase of a residential property, which generallyyield a higher margin than loans originated for refinancing existing loans, comprised 90.6% of total originations during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to88.8% of total originations during the year ended December 31, 2017. The mix of loan type trended slightly towards more conventional loans and less governmentalloans comprising 69.7% and 30.3% of all loan originations, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to 64.5% and 35.5% of all loanoriginations, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2017.During the year ended December 31, 2018, mortgage servicing rights related to $148.7 million in loans receivable with a book value of $1.0 million were sold ata gain of $417,000. During the year ended December 31, 2017, mortgage servicing rights related to $295.1 million in loans receivable with a book value of $2.3 millionwere sold at a gain of $178,000.- 42 -Total compensation, payroll taxes and other employee benefits decreased $95,000, or 0.1%, to $80.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to$80.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The decrease primarily related to less commission expense, branch manager pay, and bonus expense. Offsettingthose decreases, salary and health insurance increased with the additional branch network with the New Mexico branch acquisition. Occupancy, office furniture, andequipment expense increased as the number of branches increased with the addition of the New Mexico branches. Advertising expense increased as branches soughtto generate origination volumes. Professional fees decreased primarily as there was less legal expenses during the year. Other noninterest expense decreased primarilydue to lower branch overhead expense, provision for loan sale losses, and servicing fees.Waterstone Mortgage Corporation originates loans in various states. The states where we originate greater than 10% of total activity are Florida andWisconsin.Comparison of Consolidated Waterstone Financial, Inc. Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 Years Ended December 31, 2018 2017 (Dollars in Thousands, except pershare amounts) Net income $30,754 25,964 Earnings per share - basic 1.12 0.95 Earnings per share - diluted 1.11 0.93 Return on assets 1.64% 1.43%Return on equity 7.60% 6.32% - 43 -Average Balance Sheets, Interest and Yields/CostsThe following table set forth average balance sheets, annualized average yields and costs, and certain other information for the periods indicated. Non-accrualloans were included in the computation of the average balances of loans receivable and held for sale. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees,discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense. Yields on interest-earning assets are computed on a fully tax-equivalent yield,where applicable. Years Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Average Average Average Average Average Average Balance Interest Rate Balance Interest Rate Balance Interest Rate (Dollars in Thousands) Interest-earning assets: Loans receivable and held for sale(1) $1,463,730 66,966 4.58% $1,369,072 60,824 4.44% $1,291,955 57,185 4.43%Mortgage related securities (2) 110,136 2,648 2.40% 123,972 2,646 2.13% 153,980 3,048 1.98%Debt securities, federal funds soldandshort-term investments (2)(3) 178,594 4,399 2.46% 198,962 4,317 2.17% 198,475 4,317 2.18%Total interest-earning assets 1,752,460 74,013 4.22% 1,692,006 67,787 4.01% 1,644,410 64,550 3.93%Noninterest-earning assets 118,737 118,228 116,826 Total assets $1,871,197 $1,810,234 $1,761,236 Interest-bearing liabilities: Demand accounts $37,388 33 0.09% $36,716 28 0.08% $34,659 19 0.05%Money market and savingsaccounts 172,760 599 0.35% 171,307 401 0.23% 168,775 392 0.23%Certificates of deposit 709,102 10,995 1.55% 671,982 7,310 1.09% 674,310 6,953 1.03%Total interest-bearingdeposits 919,250 11,627 1.26% 880,005 7,739 0.88% 877,744 7,364 0.84%Borrowings 427,301 7,896 1.85% 403,163 8,623 2.14% 381,803 12,928 3.39%Total interest-bearingliabilities 1,346,551 19,523 1.45% 1,283,168 16,362 1.28% 1,259,547 20,292 1.61% Noninterest-bearing liabilities Non-interest bearing deposits 96,648 89,785 76,016 Other non-interest bearingliabilities 23,168 26,345 22,426 Total non-interest bearingliabilities 119,816 116,130 98,442 Total liabilities 1,466,367 1,399,298 1,357,989 Equity 404,830 410,936 403,247 Total liabilities and equity $1,871,197 $1,810,234 $1,761,236 Net interest income / Net interestrate spread (4) 54,490 2.77% 51,425 2.73% 44,258 2.32%Less: taxable equivalent adjustment 313 0.02% 692 0.04% 814 0.05%Net interest income / Net interestrate spread, as reported 54,177 2.75% 50,733 2.69% 43,444 2.27%Net interest-earning assets (5) $405,909 $408,838 $384,863 Net interest margin (6) 3.09% 3.00% 2.64%Tax equivalent effect 0.02% 0.04% 0.05%Net interest margin on a fully taxequivalent basis 3.11% 3.04% 2.69%Average interest-earning assets toaverage interest-bearing liabilities 130.14% 131.86% 130.56% (1) Includes net deferred loan fee amortization income of $622,000, $689,000 and $720,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.(2) Includes available for sale securities.(3)Interest income from tax exempt securities is computed on a taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 21% for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 35% forthe years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. The yields on debt securities, federal funds sold and short-term investments before tax-equivalent adjustmentswere 2.29%, 1.82%, and 1.76% for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.(4) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities and is presented on a fully tax equivalent basis.(5) Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.(6) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.- 44 -Rate/Volume AnalysisThe following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the periods indicated. The rate column shows theeffects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changesin volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to changes in both rateand volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume. Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31, 2018 versus 2017 2017 versus 2016 Increase (Decrease) due to Increase (Decrease) due to Volume Rate Net Volume Rate Net (In Thousands) Interest and dividend income: Loans receivable and held for sale(1) (2) $4,244 $1,898 $6,142 $3,513 $126 $3,639 Mortgage related securities(3) (313) 315 2 (622) 220 (402)Other interest-earning assets(3) (4) (465) 547 82 14 (14) - Total interest-earning assets 3,466 2,760 6,226 2,905 332 3,237 Interest expense: Demand accounts - 5 5 1 8 9 Money market and savings accounts 4 194 198 9 - 9 Certificates of deposit 376 3,309 3,685 (25) 382 357 Total interest-bearing deposits 380 3,508 3,888 (15) 390 375 Borrowings 575 (1,302) (727) 770 (5,075) (4,305) Total interest-bearing liabilities 955 2,206 3,161 755 (4,685) (3,930)Net change in net interest income $2,511 $554 $3,065 $2,150 $5,017 $7,167 (1)Includes net deferred loan fee amortization income of $622,000, $689,000 and $720,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.(2)Non-accrual loans have been included in average loans receivable balance.(3)Includes available for sale securities.(4)Interest income from tax exempt securities is computed on a taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 21% for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 35% forthe year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.Net Interest IncomeNet interest income increased $3.4 million, or 6.8%, to $54.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $50.7 million during the year ended December31, 2017.·Interest income on loans increased $6.1 million due to an increase in the average balance of loans of $94.7 million and a 14 basis point increase in averageyield on loans. The increase in the average balance was driven by a $104.7 million, or 8.5%, increase in the average balance of loans held in portfolio partiallyoffset by a decrease in the average balance of loans held for sale of $10.1 million. The increase in average yield primarily related to higher offering andrepricing rates due to the Federal Funds rate increases.·Interest income from mortgage related securities increased $2,000 year over year due to a 27 basis point increase in the average yield. The increase in averageyield was driven by an increase in the Federal Funds rate since March 2017. Offsetting the increase on yield, the average balance decreased $13.8 million assecurities have paid down and less purchases have occurred to replace those securities due to current market conditions.·Interest income from other interest earning assets (comprised of debt securities, federal funds sold and short-term investments) increased $461,000 due to a47 basis point increase in the average yield. The increase in average yield was driven by an increase in the Federal Funds rate since March 2017 along withthe increase in the dividend paid by the FHLB on its stock. The average balance decreased $20.4 million to $178.6 million. Municipal securities that maturedthroughout the past 12 months were not replaced due to market conditions. Those funds were primarily used to fund loan growth at the community bankingsegment.·Interest expense on time deposits increased $3.7 million primarily due to a 46 basis point increase in the average cost of time deposits, as maturing timedeposits have repriced, or have been replaced at a higher rate in the current competitive market. Along with the increase in rate, the average balance of timedeposits increased $37.1 million compared to the prior year.·Interest expense on money market and savings accounts increased $198,000 due primarily to a 12 basis point increase in rate in order to response to marketdemands. In addition, the average balance increased $1.5 million.·Interest expense on borrowings decreased $727,000 due to a decrease in the average cost of borrowings that resulted from the maturity and replacement ofhigher rate fixed-rate borrowings. The average cost of borrowings totaled 1.85% during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to 2.14% during theyear ended December 31, 2017. Partially offsetting the decrease in rate, average volume increased $24.1 million to fund loan growth at the community bankingsegment.- 45 -Provision for Loan LossesOur provision for loan losses amounted to a negative provision of $1.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to a negative provision of $1.2million during the year ended December 31, 2017. The negative provision in 2018 reflects recoveries received during the year and a continued improvement in theoverall risk profile of the loan portfolio.The provision is primarily a function of the Company's reserving methodology and assessments of certain quantitative and qualitative factors which are used todetermine an appropriate allowance for loan losses for the period. See further discussion regarding the allowance for loan losses in the "Asset Quality" section for ananalysis of charge-offs, nonperforming assets, specific reserves and additional provisions and the "Allowance for Loan Loss" section.Noninterest Income Years Ended December 31, 2018 2017 $ Change % Change (Dollars in Thousands) Service charges on loans and deposits $1,680 1,625 55 3.4%Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance 1,848 1,807 41 2.3%Mortgage banking income 113,151 120,044 (6,893) -5.7%Loss on sale of available for sale securities - (107) 107 N/MOther 1,520 1,044 476 45.6% Total noninterest income $118,199 124,413 (6,214) (5.0%)N/M - Not meaningful Total noninterest income decreased $6.2 million, or 5.0%, to $118.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $124.4 million during the year endedDecember 31, 2017. The decrease resulted primarily from a decrease in mortgage banking income.·The $6.9 million decrease in mortgage banking income was primarily the result of a decrease in gross margin on loans sold at the mortgage banking segmentof approximately 8%. Offsetting the decrease in margin, total loan origination volume on a consolidated basis increased $51.5 million, or 2.1%, to $2.51 billionduring the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $2.46 billion during the year ended December 31, 2017. See "Comparison of Mortgage BankingSegment Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017" above, for additional discussion of the decrease in mortgage banking income.·The increase in service charges on loans and deposits was related to an increase in loan prepayment fees in 2018.·The increase in cash surrender value of life insurance was primarily due to the purchase of a $2.5 million policy in June 2017 along with a higher earnings rate.·The $107,000 loss on sale of securities in 2017 was due to a sale of a municipal bond in June 2017. There were no sales of securities in 2018.·The $476,000 increase in other noninterest income was primarily due to an increase in gain on sale of mortgage servicing rights. A bulk sale of mortgageservicing rights resulted in a gain of $417,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to a gain of $178,000 on sales of mortgage servicing rightsduring the year ended December 31, 2017. In addition to the increase from the gain on sale of mortgage servicing rights, other noninterest income alsoincreased due to increases from servicing fee income on loans sold, rental income, and wealth management revenue.Noninterest Expenses Years Ended December 31, 2018 2017 $ Change % Change (Dollars in Thousands) Compensation, payroll taxes, and other employee benefits $97,784 97,084 700 0.7%Occupancy, office furniture and equipment 10,855 10,178 677 6.7%Advertising 4,123 3,333 790 23.7%Data processing 2,792 2,439 353 14.5%Communications 1,611 1,560 51 3.3%Professional fees 2,327 2,656 (329) (12.4%)Real estate owned 1 379 (378) (99.7%)Loan processing expense 3,372 3,062 310 10.1%Other 10,291 11,188 (897) (8.0%) Total noninterest expenses $133,156 131,879 1,277 1.0% - 46 -Total noninterest expenses increased $1.3 million, or 1.0%, to $133.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $131.9 million during the year endedDecember 31, 2017.·Compensation, payroll taxes and other employee benefit expense at our mortgage banking segment decreased $95,000, or 0.1%, to $80.0 million for the yearended December 31, 2018. The decrease primarily related to less commission expense, branch manager pay, and bonus expense. Offsetting those decreases,salary and health insurance increased with the additional branches added with the New Mexico branch acquisition in 2018. See additional discussionregarding New Mexico branches in Business Combination footnote.·Compensation, payroll taxes and other employee benefits expense at the community banking segment increased $890,000, or 5.1%, to $18.4 million during theyear ended December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily due to health insurance, salaries expense, and variable compensation offset by lower stock-basedcompensation expenses.·Occupancy, office furniture and equipment expense at the mortgage banking segment increased $497,000 to $7.5 million during the year ended December 31,2018 compared to the prior year resulting from additional rent and depreciation expense in the current year compared to the prior year due to the addition ofthe New Mexico branches during 2018. ·Occupancy, office furniture and equipment expense at the community banking segment increased $180,000 to $3.3 million during the year ended December 31,2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related to snow removal, maintenance and repair expense, and computer supplies.·Advertising expense increased as a result of increased advertising efforts to generate more volume at the mortgage banking segment branches and promotedeposit offers at the community banking segment.·Data processing expense increased $353,000 to $2.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018. This was primarily due to increases at the mortgagebanking segment with the addition of the New Mexico branches.·Professional fees expense decreased as a result of a decrease in consulting, accounting, and legal expense at the mortgage banking segment offset by anincrease in consulting at the community banking segment.·Net real estate owned expense decreased $378,000, to $1,000 of expense during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $379,000 of expense during theyear ended December 31, 2017. Property management expense, not including gains/losses on sales of real estate owned, decreased $138,000 to $266,000during 2018 compared to 2017 due to a reduction in the number of properties under management during the year. Real estate owned writedowns decreased$206,000 to $308,000 for 2018. Net gains on sales of real estate owned increased $35,000 to $574,000 during 2018.·Loan processing expense increased $310,000 to $3.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2018. This was driven by an increase in credit report fees atthe mortgage banking segment.·Other noninterest expense decreased $897,000 to $10.3 million primarily due to decreased expense at the mortgage banking segment. The mortgage bankingsegment expense decreased primarily from lower branch overhead and lower provision for losses on loans sold. The community banking segment expensedecreased primarily from lower loan origination and FDIC assessment expenses.Income TaxesIncome tax expense decreased $8.9 million to $9.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $18.5 million during the year ended December31, 2017. Income tax expense was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2018 at an effective rate of 23.6% compared to an effective rate of 41.6% during theyear ended December 31, 2017. The decrease in the effective rate primarily resulted from the federal tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% as a result of The Tax Cuts andJobs Act that was enacted into law on December 22, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized a benefit of approximately $197,000related to stock awards exercised compared to a benefit of $881,000 recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017.As a result of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the Company revalued its net deferred tax asset to reflect the reduction in its federal corporate income tax rate from35% to 21%. This revaluation resulted in a one-time income tax expense of approximately $2.7 million during the fourth quarter of 2017.Comparison of Community Banking Segment Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016Net income from our community banking segment for the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $16.4 million compared to net income of $14.0 million for theyear ended December 31, 2016. Net interest income increased $7.7 million to $50.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $42.9 million for the yearended December 31, 2016 due to an increase in average loan balances and a reduction in our overall cost of funding. The long-term borrowings that matured during2017 and 2016 were replaced with a lower cost mix of funding, including long and short-term borrowings and deposits raised through our retail network. Provision forloan losses decreased $1.5 million as asset quality metrics continued to improve. Noninterest income decreased $677,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 as loanprepayment fees decreased and there was a $107,000 loss on sale of securities partially offset by an increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance.Compensation, payroll taxes, and other employee benefits expense increased $303,000 to $17.5 million primarily due to increases in salary expense along withan increase in ESOP expense, offset by a decrease in health insurance cost. FDIC premiums and real estate owned expense decreased as asset quality improved and weexperienced a reduction of foreclosed properties. Occupancy, office furniture, and equipment decreased due primarily to lower depreciation expense. Those decreaseswere partially offset by an increase in other noninterest expense resulting from an increase in loan originations.- 47 -Income tax expense increased $5.2 million to $12.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to higher pretax income andthe deferred tax revaluation. As a result of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was enacted into law on December 22, 2017, the Company revalued its net deferred tax assetto reflect the reduction in its federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. This revaluation resulted in a one-time income tax expense of approximately $2.7million during the fourth quarter of 2017.Comparison of Mortgage Banking Segment Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016Net income from our mortgage banking segment for the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $9.6 million compared to net income of $12.3 million for the yearended December 31, 2016. We originated $2.46 billion in mortgage loans held for sale during the year ended December 31, 2017, which was an increase of $79.4 million,or 3.3%, from the $2.38 billion originated during the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in loan production volume was driven by a 12.2% increase inmortgage purchase products offset by a 31.6% decrease in refinance products. The loans sold volume also increased $213.5 million to $2.53 million during the yearended December 31, 2017. Total mortgage banking income decreased $1.0 million, or 0.8%, to $120.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to$121.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. Margins decreased approximately 3.3% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016.Our overall margin can be affected by the mix of both loan type (conventional loans versus governmental) and loan purpose (purchase versus refinance). Conventional loans include loans that conform to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac standards, whereas governmental loans are those loans guaranteed by the federalgovernment, such as a Federal Housing Authority or U.S. Department of Agriculture loan. Loans originated for the purchase of a residential property, which generallyyield a higher margin than loans originated for refinancing existing loans, comprised 88.8% of total originations during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to82.9% of total originations during the year ended December 31, 2016. The mix of loan type trended slightly towards more governmental loans and less conventionalloans comprising 35.5% and 64.5% of all loan originations, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared 34.9% and 65.1% of all loan originations,respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2016.During the year ended December 31, 2017, mortgage servicing rights related to $295.1 million in loans receivable with a book value of $2.3 million were sold ata gain of $178,000. During the year ended December 31, 2016, no mortgage servicing rights were sold.Total compensation, payroll taxes and other employee benefits increased $1.8 million, or 2.3%, to $80.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 comparedto $78.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in compensation within our mortgage banking segment correlated to the increase in loanproduction due to the commission-based compensation structure in place for our mortgage banking loan officers along with the additional branches brought onduring the year. Occupancy, office furniture, and equipment expense increased as we added branches during the year. Other noninterest expense increased $1.4 millionto $19.0 million as volume-based expenses increased and profitability at the branches decreased.Comparison of Consolidated Waterstone Financial, Inc. Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 Years Ended December 31, 2017 2016 (Dollars in Thousands, except pershare amounts) Net income $25,964 25,532 Earnings per share - basic 0.95 0.94 Earnings per share - diluted 0.93 0.93 Return on assets 1.43% 1.45%Return on equity 6.32% 6.33% - 48 -Net Interest IncomeNet interest income increased $7.3 million, or 16.8%, to $50.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $43.4 million during the year endedDecember 31, 2016.●Interest income on loans increased $3.6 million due to an increase in average balance of $77.1 million and a one basis point increase in average yield on loans. The increase in average loan balance was driven by a $98.7 million increase in the average balance of loans held in portfolio partially offset by a decrease in theaverage balance of loans held for sale of $21.6 million.●Interest income from mortgage related securities decreased $402,000 year over year due to a $30.0 million decrease in average balance as securities have paiddown and less purchases have occurred to replace those securities as those funds were used to support loan growth.●Interest income from other interest earning assets (comprised of debt securities, federal funds sold and short-term investments) increased due to a six basispoint increase in the average yield. The increase in average yield was driven by a 75 basis point increase in the Federal Funds rate since December 2016. Theaverage balance remained relatively flat at $199.0 million. Municipal securities that matured during the year and were not replaced due to market conditions. Those funds were primarily held in a cash account.●Interest expense on time deposits increased $357,000 primarily due to a six basis point increase in the average cost of funds, as maturing time deposits haverepriced, or have been replaced at a higher rate in the current competitive market. Partially offsetting the increase in rate, the average balance of time depositsdecreased $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.●Interest expense on money market and savings accounts increased $9,000 due to an increase in average balance. The increase in volume reflects the Company'sstrategy to remain competitive and grow this segment of retail funds●Interest expense on borrowings decreased $4.3 million due to a decrease in the average cost of borrowings that resulted from the maturity and replacement offixed rate borrowings. The average cost of borrowings totaled 2.14% during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to 3.39% during the year endedDecember 31, 2016.Provision for Loan LossesOur provision for loan losses decreased $1.5 million, to a negative provision of $1.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, from a provision of$380,000 during the year ended December 31, 2016. The negative provision recorded during the current year period reflects the continued improvement in loan qualitymetrics including: non-accrual loans, loans rated substandard or watch, and loans past due. The provision is primarily a function of the Company's reserving methodology and assessments of certain quantitative and qualitative factors which are usedto determine an appropriate allowance for loan losses for the period. See further discussion regarding the allowance for loan losses in the "Asset Quality" section foran analysis of charge-offs, nonperforming assets, specific reserves and additional provisions and the "Allowance for Loan Loss" section.Noninterest Income Years Ended December 31, 2017 2016 $ Change % Change (Dollars in Thousands) Service charges on loans and deposits $1,625 2,232 (607) (27.2)%Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance 1,807 1,767 40 2.3%Mortgage banking income 120,044 121,069 (1,025) (0.8)%Gain on sale of available for sale securities (107) - (107) N/MOther 1,044 1,297 (253) (19.5)% Total noninterest income $124,413 126,365 (1,952) (1.5)%N/M - Not meaningful - 49 -Total noninterest income decreased $2.0 million, or 1.5%, to $124.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $126.4 million during the yearended December 31, 2016. The decrease resulted primarily from a decrease in mortgage banking income and a decrease in service charges on loans and deposits.●The decrease in mortgage banking income was the result of a decrease in margin of approximately 3.3%. Partially offsetting the margin decrease, originationvolume increased $79.4 million, or 3.3%, to $2.46 billion during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to a $2.38 billion during the year ended December31, 2016. See "Comparison of Mortgage Banking Segment Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016" above, for additional discussion of thedecrease in mortgage banking income.●The decrease in service charges on loans and deposits was related to an decrease in loan prepayment penalties in 2017.●The increase in cash surrender value of life insurance was related to the additional earnings on the $10.0 million policy purchased in March 2016 and a $2.5million policy in June 2017.●The $107,000 loss on sale of securities was due to a sale of a municipal bond in June 2017. There were no sales of securities in 2016.●The $253,000 decrease in other noninterest income was primarily due to a decrease in servicing fee income on loans sold as a result of the bulk sale of mortgageservicing rights in early 2017. Offsetting the decrease in servicing fee income, there was a bulk sale of mortgage servicing rights resulting in a gain of $178,000during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to no gain on sales of mortgage servicing rights during the year ended December 31, 2016.Noninterest Expenses Years Ended December 31, 2017 2016 $ Change % Change (Dollars in Thousands) Compensation, payroll taxes, and other employee benefits $97,084 95,056 2,028 2.1%Occupancy, office furniture and equipment 10,178 9,347 831 8.9%Advertising 3,333 2,743 590 21.5%Data processing 2,439 2,520 (81) (3.2)%Communications 1,560 1,462 98 6.7%Professional fees 2,656 2,135 521 24.4%Real estate owned 379 399 (20) (5.0)%Loan processing expense 3,062 2,875 187 6.5%Other 11,188 10,898 290 2.7% Total noninterest expenses $131,879 127,435 4,444 3.5% Total noninterest expenses increased $4.4 million, or 3.5%, to $131.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $127.4 million during theyear ended December 31, 2016.●Compensation, payroll taxes and other employee benefit expense at the mortgage banking segment increased $1.8 million to $80.1 million. The increase incompensation within our mortgage banking segment correlated to the increase in loan production due to the commission-based compensation structure inplace for our mortgage banking loan officers along with the additional staffing associated with branches brought on during the year.●Compensation, payroll taxes and other employee benefits expense at the community banking segment increased $303,000 primarily due to ESOP expense alongwith an increase to salaries partially offset by a decrease in health insurance. ESOP expense increased due to the increased average stock price of the sharesthroughout 2017. Salaries also increased due to annual wage increases. Health insurance decreased as claims have been lower in 2017 compared to 2016.●Occupancy, office furniture and equipment expense at the mortgage banking segment increased $869,000 primarily due to additional rent expense in the currentyear compared to prior year due to the addition of branches. Offsetting the rent increase, there was less depreciation expense during the year ended December31, 2017 compared to the prior year.●Occupancy, office furniture and equipment expense at the community banking segment decreased $38,000 primarily due to less depreciation expense during theyear ended December 31, 2017 compared to the prior year.●Advertising expense increased as a result of increased advertising efforts to generate more volume at the mortgage banking segment branches.●Professional fees expense increased as a result of an increase in legal fees at the mortgage banking segment, primarily related to ongoing litigation. Audit andtax expense increased at the community banking segment.●Net real estate owned expense decreased $20,000, to $379,000 of expense during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $399,000 of expense during theyear ended December 31, 2016. Property management expense, aside from gains/losses on sales of real estate owned, decreased $192,000 to $404,000 during2017 compared to 2016 due to a reduction in the number of properties under management during the year. Real estate owned writedowns decreased $142,000 to$514,000 for 2017 compared to $656,000 for 2016. Offsetting those decreases to real estate owned expense, net gains on sales of real estate owned decreased$314,000 to $539,000 during 2017 compared to $853,000 during 2016.●Other noninterest expense increased at both the community banking and mortgage banking segments. The community banking increased primarily due tohigher loan originations. The mortgage banking segment increase was primarily due to a higher branch losses as profitability slowed.- 50 -Income TaxesIncome tax expense increased $2.0 million to $18.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $16.5 million during the year endedDecember 31, 2016. Income tax expense was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017 at an effective rate of 41.6% compared to an effective rate of 39.2%during the year ended December 31, 2016.As a result of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was enacted into law on December 22, 2017, the Company revalued its net deferred tax asset to reflect thereduction in its federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. This revaluation resulted in a one-time income tax expense of approximately $2.7 million during thefourth quarter of 2017.During the year ended December 31, 2016, all of the non-qualified options granted in 2007 that gave rise to the deferred tax asset were exercised and a taxdeduction was realized to the extent that the exercise price exceeded the option strike price. The amount of the deduction realized by the Company was significantlyless than the deferred tax asset. As a result, the remaining deferred tax asset was written off and the Company recognized $658,000 in additional income tax expenseduring the year ended December 31, 2016. The revaluation is subject to adjustment in future periods.Liquidity and Capital ResourcesWe maintain liquid assets at levels we consider adequate to meet our liquidity needs. The liquidity ratio is equal to average daily cash and cash equivalentsfor the period divided by average total assets. We adjust our liquidity levels to fund loan commitments, repay our borrowings, fund deposit outflows and pay realestate taxes on mortgage loans. We also adjust liquidity as appropriate to meet asset and liability management objectives. The operational adequacy of our liquidityposition at any point in time is dependent upon the judgment of the Chief Financial Officer as supported by the Asset/Liability Committee. Liquidity is monitored on adaily, weekly and monthly basis using a variety of measurement tools and indicators. Regulatory liquidity, as required by the WDFI, is based on current liquid assetsas a percentage of the prior month’s average deposits and short-term borrowings. Minimum primary liquidity is equal to 4.0% of deposits and short-term borrowingsand minimum total regulatory liquidity is equal to 8.0% of deposits and short-term borrowings. The Bank’s primary and total regulatory liquidity at December 31, 2018were 11.1% and 23.0%, respectively.Our primary sources of liquidity are deposits, amortization and repayment of loans, sales of loans held for sale, maturities of investment securities and othershort-term investments, and earnings and funds provided from operations. While scheduled principal repayments on loans are a relatively predictable source offunds, deposit flows and loan repayments are greatly influenced by market interest rates, economic conditions, and rates offered by our competitors. We set theinterest rates on our deposits to maintain a desired level of total deposits. In addition, we invest excess funds in short-term, interest-earning assets, which provideliquidity to meet lending requirements. Additional sources of liquidity used to manage long- and short-term cash flows include advances from the FHLB.A portion of our liquidity consists of cash and cash equivalents, which are a product of our operating, investing and financing activities. At December 31,2018 and 2017, $86.1 million and $48.6 million, respectively, of our assets were invested in cash and cash equivalents. Our primary sources of cash are principalrepayments on loans, proceeds from the calls and maturities of debt and mortgage related securities, increases in deposit accounts, Federal funds purchased andadvances from the FHLB.Our cash flows are derived from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities as reported in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flowsincluded in our Consolidated Financial Statements.During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, we originated $2.51 billion, $2.46 billion, and $2.38 billion in loans for sale and sold loans of $2.63billion, $2.66 billion, and $2.44 billion. During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 loan originations net of loan repayments resulted in a negative cashflows of $87.6 million, $116.9 million and $68.1 million. The growth in loans receivable reflects the Bank's focus on growing single family, multi-family residentialproperty, and commercial real estate loans. Cash received from the principal repayments of debt and mortgage related securities and maturity and calls of debtsecurities totaled $39.0 million, $48.7 million and $54.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We purchased $28.1 million, $23.0million and $14.5 million in debt securities and mortgage related securities classified as available for sale during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016,respectively. We sold a $448,000 available for sale debt security during the year ended December 31, 2017. There were no securities sold during the years endedDecember 31, 2018 and 2016. The net increases in deposits were $71.1 million, $18.0 million and $56.1 million for the years ending December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.We received a $474,000 death benefit on a bank owned life insurance policy in 2018. There was a net increase in borrowings of $48.8 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2018. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the net decreases in borrowings were $870,000 and $54.0 million. During the years endedDecember 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, we repurchased common stock of $19.2 million, $2.2 million, and $3.9 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31,2018, 2017, and 2016, we paid cash dividends on common stock of $27.1 million, $27.0 million, and $6.9 million, respectively.Deposits increased by $71.1 million from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018. The increase in deposits was the result of a $9.5 million increase in demanddeposits, $14.7 million increase in money market and savings, and $46.9 million increase in certificates of deposits. Deposit flows are generally affected by the level ofinterest rates, market conditions and products offered by local competitors and other factors.Liquidity management is both a daily and longer-term function of business management. If we require funds beyond our ability to generate them internally,borrowing agreements exist with the FHLB which provide an additional source of funds. At December 31, 2018, we had $430.0 million in long term advances from theFHLB with contractual maturity dates in 2027, and 2028. The 2027 advance maturities have single call options in May 2019, June 2019, August 2019, and December2019. The 2028 advance maturities have single call options in March 2020, March 2021, May 2020, and May 2021, along with two advances that have quarterly calloptions beginning in June 2020 and September 2020. As an additional source of funds, the mortgage banking segment has a repurchase agreement. At December 31,2018, we had $5.0 million outstanding under the repurchase agreement with a total outstanding commitment of $35.0 million. - 51 -At December 31, 2018, we had outstanding commitments to originate loans receivable of $33.8 million. In addition, at December 31, 2018, we had unfundedcommitments under construction loans of $79.8 million, unfunded commitments under business lines of credit of $16.8 million and unfunded commitments under homeequity lines of credit and standby letters of credit of $15.8 million. At December 31, 2018, certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in less than one year totaled$472.5 million. Based on prior experience, management believes that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with us, although there can be no assurance thatthis will be the case. In the event a significant portion of our deposits are not retained by us, we will have to utilize other funding sources, such as Federal Home LoanBank of Chicago advances, Federal Reserve Discount Window or brokered deposits to maintain our level of assets. However, such borrowings may not be availableon attractive terms, or at all, if and when needed. Alternatively, we would reduce our level of liquid assets, such as our cash and cash equivalents and securitiesavailable for sale in order to meet funding needs. In addition, the cost of such deposits may be significantly higher if market interest rates are higher or there is anincreased amount of competition for deposits in our market area at the time of renewal.Waterstone Financial, Inc. and WaterStone Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements, including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning assets and off-balance sheet items tobroad risk categories. At December 31, 2018, Waterstone Financial, Inc. and WaterStone Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements and is considered “wellcapitalized” under regulatory guidelines. See “Supervision and Regulation—Capital Requirements” and Note 9 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.CapitalShareholders’ equity decreased $12.4 million, or 3.0%, to $399.7 million at December 31, 2018 from $412.1 million at December 31, 2017. Shareholders' equitydecreased primarily due to the declaration of regular dividends and a special dividend, the repurchase of stock, and the decrease in the fair value of the securityportfolio. Partially offsetting the decreases were increases to net income, additional paid in capital as stock options were exercised, and unearned ESOP shares as theycontinue to vest.The Company's Board of Directors authorized the fifth stock repurchase program in the fourth quarter of 2018. The timing of the purchases will depend oncertain factors, including but not limited to, market conditions and prices, available funds and alternative uses of capital. The stock repurchase program may be carriedout through open-market purchases, block trades, negotiated private transactions and pursuant to a trading plan that will be adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Repurchased shares are held by the Company as authorized but unissued shares.The Company had repurchased 7,035,053 shares at an average price of $13.62 under previously approved stock repurchase plans as of December 31, 2018.The Company is authorized to purchase up to 692,700 additional shares under the current approved stock repurchase program as of December 31, 2018. The Companyalso repurchased shares for minimum tax withholding settlements on equity compensation. These purchases are not included in the 7,035,053 total above and do notcount against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the Board of Directors' authorization.Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingent Liabilities, and Off-balance Sheet ArrangementsWaterStone Bank has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments that may require future cash payments. The followingtables present information indicating various non-deposit contractual obligations and commitments of WaterStone Bank as of December 31, 2018 and the respectivematurity dates.Contractual Obligations More Than More Than One Year Three Years One Year or Through Through Five Over Five Total Less Three Years Years Years (In Thousands) Deposits without a stated maturity (3) $302,622 $302,622 $- $- $- Certificates of deposit (3) 735,873 472,540 260,097 3,236 - Repurchase agreements (3) 5,046 5,046 - - - Federal Home Loan Bank advances (1) 430,000 - - - 430,000 Operating leases (2) 10,405 3,454 4,224 1,813 914 Total Contractual Obligations $1,483,946 $783,662 $264,321 $5,049 $430,914 _______________(1) Secured under a blanket security agreement on qualifying assets, principally, mortgage loans. Excludes interest that will accrue on the advances.(2) Represents non-cancellable operating leases for offices and equipment.(3) Excludes interest.The following table details the amounts and expected maturities of significant off-balance sheet commitments as of December 31, 2018. Commitments to extend creditare agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract and generally have fixed expiration dates or othertermination clauses.- 52 -Other Commitments More than More than One Year Three through Years One Year Three Through Over Five Total or Less Years Five Years Years (In Thousands) Real estate loan commitments(1) $33,762 $33,762 $- $- $- Unused portion of home equity lines of credit(2) 14,903 14,903 - - - Unused portion of construction loans(3) 79,776 79,776 - - - Unused portion of business lines of credit 16,778 16,778 - - - Standby letters of credit 860 860 - - - _______________(1) Commitments for loans are extended to customers for up to 90 days after which they expire.(2) Unused portions of home equity loans are available to the borrower for up to 10 years.(3) Unused portions of construction loans are available to the borrower for up to one year.Contingent LiabilitiesHerrington et al. v. Waterstone Mortgage CorporationWaterstone Mortgage Corporation is a defendant in a class action lawsuit that was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin andsubsequently compelled to arbitration before the American Arbitration Association. The plaintiff class alleged that Waterstone Mortgage Corporation violated certainprovisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and failed to pay loan officers consistent with their employment agreements. On July 5, 2017, the arbitrator issued aFinal Award finding Waterstone Mortgage Corporation liable for unpaid minimum wages, overtime, unreimbursed business expenses, and liquidated damages underthe FLSA. On December 8, 2017, the District Court confirmed the award in large part, and entered a judgment against Waterstone in the amount of $7,267,919 indamages to Claimants, $3,298,851 in attorney fees and costs, and a $20,000 incentive fee to Plaintiff Herrington, plus post-judgment interest. On February 12, 2018, theDistrict Court awarded post-arbitration fees and costs of approximately $98,000. The judgment was appealed by Waterstone to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals,where oral argument was held on May 29, 2018. On October 22, 2018, the Seventh Circuit issued a ruling vacating the District Court's order enforcing the arbitrationaward. If the District Court determines the agreement only allows for individual arbitration, the award would be vacated and the case sent to individual arbitration fora new proceeding. If the District Court determines the arbitration agreement nevertheless allows for collective arbitration, the District Court could confirm the prioraward.On December 28, 2018, Plaintiff filed her post-remand brief. In it, Plaintiff asks the Court to reaffirm the arbitration award entered by Arbitrator Pratt in full.Alternatively, she asked the Court to affirm her individual damage award and the awards of 123 other opt-ins whose arbitration agreements permit joinder or classactions. Lastly, Plaintiff asked the Court to have 154 opt-ins intervene and file an amended complaint for individual relief in court. Waterstone opposed the motion onJanuary 28, 2019, and asked the Court to vacate the prior Final Award in full because Herrington’s arbitration agreement only allows for individual arbitration. Plaintifffiled its reply on February 14, 2019.If the judgment is upheld in full, the Company has estimated that the award, which includes attorney's fees, costs, and interest, could be as high as $11 million.However, Waterstone has meaningful appellate rights and intends to vigorously defend its interests in this matter, including arguing for complete reversal on appeal.Although the Company believes there is a strong basis to vacate the award, there remains a reasonable possibility that the Court's judgment will be affirmed in wholeor in part, with the possible range of loss from $0 to $11 million. We do not believe that the loss is probable at this time, as that term is used in assessing losscontingencies. Accordingly, in accordance with the authoritative guidance in the evaluation of contingencies, the Company has not recorded an accrual related to thismatter.Werner et al. v. Waterstone Mortgage CorporationWaterstone Mortgage Corporation is a defendant in a putative collection action lawsuit that was filed on August 4, 2017 in the United States District Court for theWestern District of Wisconsin, Werner et al. v. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation. Plaintiffs allege that Waterstone Mortgage Corporation violated the Fair LaborStandards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay loan officers minimum and overtime wages. On October 26, 2017, Plaintiffs moved for conditional certification and to providenotice to the putative class. On February 9, 2018, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification and notice.On July 23, 2018, Waterstone filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the claims. It sought to (1) dismiss the time-barred claims of 4 opt-ins and (2) dismiss allother opt-ins due to the denial of conditional certification. In response, all but Werner and Wiesneski filed motions to withdraw their consents to join the case. TheCourt denied the summary judgment motion on the basis that it was moot due to the opt-in plaintiffs voluntarily dismissing their case.On October 17, 2018, Werner and Wiesneski asked the Court to send their claims to arbitration. On December 13, 2018, the Court denied the request, finding they hadwaived their right to arbitrate based on litigating the case in Court for over a year. Thus, the case remained in Court as a two-Plaintiff case.- 53 -As of February 2019, the parties have reached a settlement in principle to resolve the claims. The amount of the settlement would not have a material impact to thefinancial statements. The parties are working on finalizing the terms of settlement.Impact of Inflation and Changing PricesThe financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States("GAAP"). GAAP generally requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without consideration for changes in therelative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of our operations. Unlike industrial companies,our assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature. As a result, changes in market interest rates have a greater impact on performance than do the effects ofinflation.Quarterly Financial InformationThe following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly data for the periods indicated: Quarter Ended March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 (In thousands, except per share data) 2018 (unaudited) Interest income $16,963 $18,363 $19,046 $19,328 Interest expense 3,822 4,643 5,196 5,862 Net interest income 13,141 13,720 13,850 13,466 Provision (credit) for loan losses (880) (220) 40 - Net interest income after provision for loan losses 14,021 13,940 13,810 13,466 Total noninterest income 25,183 33,318 34,062 25,636 Total noninterest expense 30,147 34,737 36,426 31,846 Income before income taxes 9,057 12,521 11,446 7,256 Income taxes 2,104 3,101 2,743 1,578 Net income $6,953 $9,420 $8,703 $5,678 Income per share – basic $0.25 $0.34 $0.32 $0.11 Income per share - diluted $0.25 $0.34 $0.31 $0.21 2017 (unaudited) Interest income $15,786 $16,540 $17,453 $17,316 Interest expense 3,891 4,059 4,420 3,992 Net interest income 11,895 12,481 13,033 13,324 Provision for loan losses (1,211) 25 20 - Net interest income after provision for loan losses 13,106 12,456 13,013 13,324 Total noninterest income 25,937 37,241 33,054 28,181 Total noninterest expense 29,058 36,187 34,316 32,318 Income before income taxes 9,985 13,510 11,751 9,187 Income taxes 3,413 4,622 4,362 6,072 Net income $6,572 $8,888 $7,389 $3,115 Income per share – basic $0.24 $0.32 $0.27 $0.11 Income per share - diluted $0.24 $0.32 $0.26 $0.11 - 54 -Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskManagement of Market RiskGeneral. The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Consequently, our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. Ourassets, consisting primarily of mortgage loans, have longer maturities than our liabilities, consisting primarily of deposits. As a result, a principal part of our businessstrategy is to manage interest rate risk and reduce the exposure of our net interest income to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, WaterStone Bank’s boardof directors has established an Asset/Liability Committee which is responsible for evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, for determiningthe level of risk that is appropriate given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this riskconsistent with the guidelines approved by the board of directors. Management monitors the level of interest rate risk on a regular basis and the Asset/LiabilityCommittee meets at least weekly to review our asset/liability policies and interest rate risk position, which are evaluated quarterly.We have sought to manage our interest rate risk in order to minimize the exposure of our earnings and capital to changes in interest rates. We haveimplemented the following strategies to manage our interest rate risk: (i) emphasizing variable rate loans including variable rate one- to four-family, and commercial realestate loans as well as three to five year commercial real estate balloon loans; (ii) reducing and shortening the expected average life of the investment portfolio; and(iii) whenever possible, lengthening the term structure of our deposit base and our borrowings from the FHLBC. These measures should reduce the volatility of ournet interest income in different interest rate environments.Income Simulation. Simulation analysis is an estimate of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time. At least quarterly we review thepotential effect changes in interest rates may have on the repayment or repricing of rate sensitive assets and funding requirements of rate sensitive liabilities. Ourmost recent simulation uses projected repricing of assets and liabilities at December 31, 2018 on the basis of contractual maturities, anticipated repayments andscheduled rate adjustments. Prepayment rate assumptions may have a significant impact on interest income simulation results. Because of the large percentage ofloans and mortgage-backed securities we hold, rising or falling interest rates may have a significant impact on the actual prepayment speeds of our mortgage relatedassets that may in turn affect our interest rate sensitivity position. When interest rates rise, prepayment speeds slow and the average expected lives of our assetswould tend to lengthen more than the expected average lives of our liabilities and therefore would most likely have a positive impact on net interest income andearnings.The following interest rate scenario displays the percentage change in net interest income over a one-year time horizon assuming increases of 100, 200 and300 basis points and a decrease of 100 basis points. The results incorporate actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for balance sheet accounts following aninstantaneous parallel change in market rates based upon a static (no growth balance sheet).Analysis of Net Interest Income Sensitivity Immediate Change in Rates +300 +200 +100 -100 (Dollar Amounts in Thousands) As of December 31, 2018 Dollar Change $1,739 1,355 674 (959) Percentage Change 3.37% 2.63 1.31 (1.86)At December 31, 2018, a 100 basis point instantaneous increase in interest rates had the effect of increasing forecast net interest income over the next 12months by 1.31% while a 100 basis point decrease in rates had the effect of decreasing net interest income by 1.86%.- 55 -Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and ShareholdersWaterstone Financial, Inc. Opinion on the Financial StatementsWe have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Waterstone Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31,2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years inthe period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financialstatements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cashflows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal controlover financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of SponsoringOrganizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013, and our report dated March 6, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'sinternal control over financial reporting.Basis for OpinionThese financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statementsbased on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance withU.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonableassurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assessthe risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such proceduresincluded examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accountingprinciples used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our auditsprovide a reasonable basis for our opinion. /s/ RSM US LLP We have served as the Company's auditor since 2014. Milwaukee, Wisconsin March 6, 2019 - 56 -Waterstone Financial, Inc. and SubsidiariesConsolidated Statements of Financial ConditionDecember 31, 2018 and 2017 December 31, 2018 2017 Assets (In Thousands, except share data) Cash $48,234 22,306 Federal funds sold 25,100 17,034 Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions and other short term investments 12,767 9,267 Cash and cash equivalents 86,101 48,607 Securities available for sale (at fair value) 185,720 199,707 Loans held for sale (at fair value) 141,616 149,896 Loans receivable 1,379,148 1,291,814 Less: Allowance for loan losses 13,249 14,077 Loans receivable, net 1,365,899 1,277,737 Office properties and equipment, net 24,524 22,941 Federal Home Loan Bank stock (at cost) 19,350 16,875 Cash surrender value of life insurance 67,550 65,996 Real estate owned, net 2,152 4,558 Prepaid expenses and other assets 22,469 20,084 Total assets $1,915,381 1,806,401 Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Liabilities: Demand deposits $139,111 129,597 Money market and savings deposits 163,511 148,804 Time deposits 735,873 688,979 Total deposits 1,038,495 967,380 Borrowings 435,046 386,285 Advance payments by borrowers for taxes 4,371 4,876 Other liabilities 37,790 35,756 Total liabilities 1,515,702 1,394,297 Shareholders’ equity: Preferred stock (par value $.01 per share) Authorized - 50,000,000 shares in 2018 and 2017, no shares issued - - Common stock (par value $.01 per share) Authorized - 100,000,000 shares in 2018 and 2017 Issued - 28,463,239 in 2018 and29,501,346 in 2017 Outstanding - 28,463,239 in 2018 and 29,501,346 in 2017 285 295 Additional paid-in capital 330,327 326,655 Retained earnings 187,153 183,358 Unearned ESOP shares (17,804) (18,991)Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes (2,361) (477)Cost of shares repurchased (7,171,537 in 2018 and 6,030,900 in 2017), at cost (97,921) (78,736)Total shareholders’ equity 399,679 412,104 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $1,915,381 1,806,401 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements- 57 -Waterstone Financial, Inc. and SubsidiariesConsolidated Statements of OperationsYears ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 Years ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (In Thousands, except per share amounts) Interest income: Loans $66,966 60,824 57,185 Mortgage-related securities 2,648 2,646 3,048 Debt securities, federal funds sold and short-term investments 4,086 3,625 3,503 Total interest income 73,700 67,095 63,736 Interest expense: Deposits 11,627 7,739 7,364 Borrowings 7,896 8,623 12,928 Total interest expense 19,523 16,362 20,292 Net interest income 54,177 50,733 43,444 Provision for loan losses (1,060) (1,166) 380 Net interest income after provision for loan losses 55,237 51,899 43,064 Noninterest income: Service charges on loans and deposits 1,680 1,625 2,232 Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance 1,848 1,807 1,767 Mortgage banking income 113,151 120,044 121,069 Loss on sale of available for sale securities - (107) - Other 1,520 1,044 1,297 Total noninterest income 118,199 124,413 126,365 Noninterest expenses: Compensation, payroll taxes, and other employee benefits 97,784 97,084 95,056 Occupancy, office furniture, and equipment 10,855 10,178 9,347 Advertising 4,123 3,333 2,743 Data processing 2,792 2,439 2,520 Communications 1,611 1,560 1,462 Professional fees 2,327 2,656 2,135 Real estate owned 1 379 399 Loan processing expense 3,372 3,062 2,875 Other 10,291 11,188 10,898 Total noninterest expenses 133,156 131,879 127,435 Income before income taxes 40,280 44,433 41,994 Income tax expense 9,526 18,469 16,462 Net income $30,754 25,964 25,532 Income per share: Basic $1.12 0.95 0.94 Diluted $1.11 0.93 0.93 Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic 27,363 27,467 27,037 Diluted 27,634 27,899 27,374 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements- 58 -Waterstone Financial, Inc. and SubsidiariesConsolidated Statements of Comprehensive IncomeYears ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 Years ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (In Thousands) Net income $30,754 25,964 25,532 Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: Net unrealized holding loss on available for sale securities arising during the period, net of tax benefit of$710, $106 and $622 respectively (1,889) (159) (960)Recognition of net deferred tax liability revaluation due to tax law change 5 (5) - Reclassification adjustment for net loss on available for sale securities realized during the period, net of taxbenefit of $-, ($42) and $-, respectively - 65 - Total other comprehensive loss (1,884) (99) (960)Comprehensive income $28,870 25,865 24,572 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements- 59 -Waterstone Financial, Inc. and SubsidiariesConsolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ EquityYears Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 Common Stock Shares Amount AdditionalPaid-InCapital RetainedEarnings UnearnedESOPShares AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome (Loss) Cost ofSharesRepurchased TotalShareholders'Equity (In Thousands) Balances at December 31, 2015 29,407 $294 317,022 168,089 (21,365) 582 (72,692) 391,930 Comprehensive income: Net income - $- - 25,532 - - - 25,532 Other comprehensive loss: - - - - - (960) - (960)Total comprehensive income 24,572 ESOP shares committed to be released to Planparticipants - - 446 - 1,187 - - 1,633 Cash dividends, $0.33 per share - - - (9,056) - - - (9,056)Stock compensation activity, net of tax 307 3 3,553 - - - - 3,556 Stock based compensation expense - - 1,913 - - - - 1,913 Purchase of common stock returned toauthorized but unissued (284) $(3) - - - - (3,855) (3,858) Balances at December 31, 2016 29,430 $294 322,934 184,565 (20,178) (378) (76,547) 410,690 Comprehensive income: Net income - $- - 25,964 - - - 25,964 Other comprehensive loss: - - - - - (99) - (99)Total comprehensive income 25,865 ESOP shares committed to be released toPlan participants - - 769 - 1,187 - - 1,956 Cash dividends, $0.98 per share - - - (27,171) - - - (27,171)Stock compensation activity 194 2 1,050 - - - - 1,052 Stock based compensation expense - - 1,902 - - - - 1,902 Purchase of common stock returned toauthorized but unissued (123) (1) - - - - (2,189) (2,190) Balances at December 31, 2017 29,501 $295 326,655 183,358 (18,991) (477) (78,736) 412,104 Comprehensive income: Net income - $- - 30,754 - - - 30,754 Other comprehensive loss: - - - - - (1,884) - (1,884)Total comprehensive income 28,870 Reclassification for net deferred tax liabilityrevaluation - - - (5) - - - (5)ESOP shares committed to be released toPlan participants - - 609 - 1,187 - - 1,796 Cash dividends, $0.98 per share - - - (26,954) - - - (26,954)Stock compensation activity 103 1 1,303 - - - - 1,304 Stock based compensation expense - - 1,760 - - - - 1,760 Purchase of common stock returned toauthorized but unissued (1,141) (11) - - - - (19,185) (19,196) Balances at December 31, 2018 28,463 $285 330,327 187,153 (17,804) (2,361) (97,921) 399,679 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements- 60 -Waterstone Financial, Inc. and SubsidiariesConsolidated Statements of Cash FlowsYears ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 Years ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (In Thousands) Operating activities: Net income $30,754 25,964 25,532 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Provision for loan losses (1,060) (1,166) 380 Provision for depreciation 2,296 2,050 2,615 Deferred income taxes 535 3,079 1,564 Stock based compensation 1,760 1,902 1,913 Net amortization of premium/discount on debt and mortgage related securities 444 682 991 Amortization of unearned ESOP shares 1,796 1,956 1,633 Amortization and valuation allowance on mortgage servicing rights 191 106 598 Gain on sale of loans held for sale (109,526) (121,951) (123,154)Loans originated for sale (2,509,827) (2,458,370) (2,378,926)Proceeds on sales of loans originated for sale 2,627,634 2,655,673 2,443,347 Increase in accrued interest receivable (413) (643) (173)Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance (1,848) (1,807) (1,767)Increase (decrease) in accrued interest on deposits and borrowings 509 (30) (726)Increase (decrease) in other liabilities 1,622 (3,079) 4,659 (Increase) decrease in prepaid income tax (1,178) (1,686) 557 Loss on sale of available for sale securities - 107 - Net gain on real estate owned (265) (24) (197)Gain on sale of mortgage servicing rights (417) (178) - Other (71) 4,512 (2,908)Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 42,936 107,097 (24,062) Investing activities: Net increase in loans receivable (87,648) (116,887) (68,076)Net change in FHLB Stock (2,475) (3,600) 6,225 Purchases of: Debt securities - (6,140) (5,285)Mortgage related securities (28,058) (16,827) (9,215)Premises and equipment, net (3,962) (1,577) (1,085)Bank owned life insurance (180) (2,680) (10,180)Mortgage banking branch (163) - - Proceeds from: Principal repayments on mortgage-related securities 28,572 32,968 39,935 Maturities of debt securities 10,435 15,686 14,855 Sales of debt securities - 448 - Death benefit from bank owned life insurance 474 - - Sales of real estate owned 3,134 3,733 7,796 Net cash used in investing activities (79,871) (94,876) (25,030) Financing activities: Net increase in deposits 71,115 17,969 56,050 Net change in short term borrowings (41,239) (26,870) 65,952 Repayment of long term debt (165,000) (149,000) (220,000)Proceeds from long term debt 255,000 175,000 100,000 Net (decrease) increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes (505) 160 1,055 Cash dividends in common stock (27,050) (26,952) (6,917)Proceeds from stock option exercises 1,304 1,052 3,556 Purchase of common stock returned to authorized but unissued (19,196) (2,190) (3,858)Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 74,429 (10,831) (4,162)Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 37,494 1,390 (53,254)Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 48,607 47,217 100,471 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $86,101 48,607 47,217 Supplemental information: Cash paid or credited during the period for: Income tax payments $10,168 17,081 14,352 Interest payments 19,014 16,392 21,018 Noncash investing activities: Loans receivable transferred to other real estate 545 2,171 4,590 Dividends declared but not paid in other liabilities 3,798 3,894 3,677 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. - 61 -Waterstone Financial, Inc. and SubsidiariesNotes to Consolidated Financial StatementsYears ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 20161)Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesThe following significant accounting and reporting policies of Waterstone Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), conform to U.S.generally accepted accounting principles, or (“GAAP”), and are used in preparing and presenting these consolidated financial statements.Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. These reclassifications did not result in any changes topreviously reported net income or shareholders' equity.a)Nature of Operations The Company is a one-bank holding company with two operating segments – community banking and mortgage banking. WaterStone Bank SSB (the "Bank"or "WaterStone Bank") is principally engaged in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and using such deposits to originate real estate,business and consumer loans. The Bank provides a full range of financial services to customers through branch locations in southeastern Wisconsin. In addition, the Bank has a loanproduction office in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Bank is subject to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodicexaminations by those regulatory authorities. The Bank owns a mortgage banking subsidiary that originates residential real estate loans held for sale at various branch offices across thecountry. Mortgage banking volume fluctuates widely given movements in interest rates. Mortgage banking income is reported as a single line item in thestatements of operations while mortgage banking expense is distributed among the various noninterest expense lines. Compensation, payroll taxes and otheremployee benefits expense varies directly with mortgage banking income. b)Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of Waterstone Financial, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, WaterStoneBank. The Bank has the following wholly owned subsidiaries: Wauwatosa Investments, Inc., Waterstone Mortgage Corporation, and Main Street Real EstateHoldings, LLC. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. c)Use of Estimates The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management of the Company to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating tothe reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and thereported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include: the allowance for loanlosses, income taxes, and fair value measurements. e)Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers federal funds sold and highly liquid debt instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cashequivalents.e)Securities Available for Sale Securities At the time of purchase, investment securities are classified as available for sale, as management has the intent and ability to hold such securities for anindefinite period of time, but not necessarily to maturity. Any decision to sell investment securities available for sale would be based on various factors,including, but not limited to asset/liability management strategies, changes in interest rates or prepayment risks, liquidity needs, or regulatory capitalconsiderations. Available for sale securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred tax, reported as a separatecomponent of equity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretionof discounts to maturity or, in the case of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, over the estimated life of the security. Suchamortization or accretion is included in interest income from securities. Realized gains or losses on securities sales (using specific identification method) areincluded in other income. Declines in value judged to be other than temporary are included in net impairment losses recognized in earnings in theconsolidated statements of operations.- 62 -Other Than Temporary ImpairmentOne of the significant estimates related to securities is the evaluation of investments for other than temporary impairment. The Companyassesses investment securities with unrealized loss positions for other than temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis. When the fair value of aninvestment is less than its amortized cost at the balance sheet date of the reporting period for which impairment is assessed, the impairment is designated aseither temporary or other than temporary. In evaluating other than temporary impairment, management considers the length of time and extent to which thefair value has been less than cost and the expected recovery period of the security, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and theintent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value in thenear term. Declines in the fair value of investment securities below amortized cost are deemed to be other than temporary when the Company cannot assertthat it will recover its amortized cost basis, including whether the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis ofthe security. If it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery or if the Company has the intent to sell, an otherthan temporary impairment write down is recognized in earnings equal to the difference between the security’s amortized cost and its fair value. If it is notmore likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery and if the Company does not intend to sell, the other thantemporary impairment write down is separated into an amount representing credit loss, which is recognized in earnings, and an amount related to otherfactors, which is recognized as a separate component of equity. Following the recognition of an other than temporary impairment representing credit loss, thebook value of an investment less the impairment loss realized becomes the new cost basis. The determination as to whether an other than temporaryimpairment exists and, if so, the amount considered other than temporarily impaired, or not impaired, is subjective and, therefore, the timing and amount ofother than temporary impairments constitute material estimates that are subject to significant change.Federal Home Loan Bank StockFederal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") stock is carried at cost, which is the amount that the stock is redeemable by tendering to the FHLB or the amount atwhich shares can be sold to other FHLB members. f)Loans Held for Sale The origination of residential real estate loans is an integral component of the business of the Company. The Company generally sells its originations oflong-term fixed interest rate mortgage loans in the secondary market, and on a selective basis, retains the rights to service the loans sold. Gains and losses onthe sales of these loans are determined using the specific identification method. Mortgage loans originated for sale are generally sold within 45 days afterclosing. The Company has elected to carry loans held for sale at fair value. Fair value is generally determined by estimating a gross premium or discount, which isderived from pricing currently observable in the market. The amount by which cost differs from market value is accounted for as a valuation adjustment tothe carrying value of the loans. Changes in value are included in mortgage banking income in the consolidated statements of operations. Costs to originate loans held for sale are expensed as incurred and are included on the appropriate noninterest expense lines of the statements ofoperations. Salaries, commissions and related payroll taxes are the primary costs to originate and comprised approximately 75.1% of total mortgage bankingnoninterest expense for 2018. The value of mortgage loans held for sale and other residential mortgage loan commitments to customers are hedged by utilizing both best efforts andmandatory forward commitments to sell loans to investors in the secondary market. Such forward commitments are generally entered into at the time whenapplications are taken to protect the value of the mortgage loans from increases in market interest rates during the period held. The Company recognizesrevenue associated with the expected future cash flows of servicing loans at the time a forward loan commitment is made, as required under Securities andExchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings.g)Loans Receivable and Related Interest Income Loans are classified as held for investment when management has both the intent and ability to hold the loan for the foreseeable future, or until maturity orpayoff. Loans are carried at the principal amount outstanding, net of any unearned income, charge-offs and unamortized deferred fees and costs. Loanorigination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and the net amount amortized as an adjustment of the related loanyield. Amortization is based on a level-yield method over the contractual life of the related loans or until the loan is paid in full. Loan interest income is recognized on the accrual basis. Accrual of interest is generally discontinued either when reasonable doubt exists as to the full,timely collection of interest or principal, or when a loan becomes contractually past due more than 90 days with respect to interest or principal. At that time,previously accrued and uncollected interest on such loans is reversed and additional income is recorded only to the extent that payments are received andthe collection of principal is reasonably assured. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed inaccordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time, and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longerin doubt.A loan is accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring if the Company, for economic reasons related to the borrower’s financial condition, grants aconcession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. A troubled debt restructuring typically involves a modification of terms such as a reductionof the stated interest rate, a deferral of principal payments or a combination of both for a temporary period of time. If the borrower was performing inaccordance with the original contractual terms at the time of the restructuring, the restructured loan is accounted for on an accruing basis as long as theborrower continues to comply with the modified terms. If the loan was not accounted for on an accrual basis at the time of restructuring, the restructuredloan remains in non-accrual status until the loan completes a minimum of six consecutive contractual payments.- 63 -h)Allowance for Loan Losses The allowance for loan losses is presented as a reserve against loans and represents the Bank’s assessment of probable loan losses inherent in the loanportfolio. The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged toincome. Estimated loan losses are charged against the allowance when the loan balance is confirmed to be uncollectible directly or indirectly by the borroweror upon initiation of a foreclosure action by the Bank. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance provides for probable losses that have been identified with specific customer relationships and for probable losses believed to be inherent inthe loan portfolio, but have not been specifically identified. The Bank utilizes its own loss history to estimate inherent losses on loans. Although the Bankallocates portions of the allowance to specific loans and loan types, the entire allowance is available for any loan losses that occur. The Bank evaluates the need for specific valuation allowances on loans that are considered impaired. A loan is considered impaired when, based on currentinformation and events, it is probable that the Bank will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.Within the loan portfolio, all non-accrual loans and loans modified under troubled debt restructurings have been determined by the Bank to meet thedefinition of an impaired loan. In addition, other loans may be considered impaired loans. A valuation allowance is established for an amount equal to theimpairment when the carrying amount of the loan exceeds the present value of the expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s original effectiveinterest rate or the fair value of the underlying collateral. The Bank also establishes valuation allowances based on an evaluation of the various risk components that are inherent in the loan portfolio. The riskcomponents that are evaluated include past loan loss experience; the level of non-performing and classified assets; current economic conditions; volume,growth, and composition of the loan portfolio; adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay; the estimated value of any underlyingcollateral; regulatory guidance; and other relevant factors. The appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses is approved quarterly by the Bank’s board of directors. The allowance reflects management’s bestestimate of the amount needed to provide for the probable loss on impaired loans, as well as other credit risks of the Bank, and is based on a risk modeldeveloped and implemented by management and approved by the Bank’s board of directors. Actual results could differ from this estimate, and future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on unforeseen changes in economic conditions.In addition, federal regulators periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses. Such regulators have the authority to require the Bank to recognizeadditions to the allowance at the time of their examination. i)Real Estate Owned Real estate owned consists of properties acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure. Real estate owned is transferred into the portfolio at estimated netrealizable value. To the extent that the net carrying value of the loan exceeds the estimated fair value of the property at the date of transfer, the excess ischarged to the allowance for loan losses within 90 days of being transferred. Subsequent write-downs to reflect current fair market value, as well as gainsand losses upon disposition and revenue and expenses incurred in maintaining such properties, are treated as period costs and included in real estate ownedin the consolidated statements of operations.j)Mortgage Servicing Rights The Company sells residential mortgage loans in the secondary market and, on a selective basis, retains the right to service the loans sold. Upon sale, amortgage servicing rights asset is capitalized, which represents the then current fair value of future net cash flows expected to be realized for performingservicing activities. Mortgage servicing rights, when purchased, are initially recorded at fair value. Mortgage servicing rights are amortized over the periodof estimated net servicing income, and assessed for impairment at each reporting date. Mortgage servicing rights are carried at the lower of the initialcapitalized amount, net of accumulated amortization, or estimated fair value, and are included in other assets, net in the consolidated balance sheets. To theextent that the Company sells mortgage servicing rights, a gain is recognized for the amount of which sale proceeds exceed the remaining unamortized cost ofthe servicing rights that were sold. Gains on sale of mortgage servicing rights are included in other noninterest income in the consolidated statements ofoperations.k)Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance The Company purchases bank owned life insurance on the lives of certain employees. The Company is the beneficiary of the life insurance policies. Thecash surrender value of life insurance is reported at the amount that would be received in cash if the polices were surrendered. Increases in the cash value ofthe policies and proceeds of death benefits received are recorded in noninterest income. The increase in cash surrender value of life insurance is not subjectto income taxes, as long as the Company has the intent and ability to hold the policies until the death benefits are received. l)Office Properties and Equipment Office properties and equipment, including leasehold improvements and software, are stated at cost, net of depreciation and amortization. Depreciation andamortization are computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over thelease term, if shorter than the estimated useful life. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, while additions or major improvements arecapitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Estimated useful lives of the assets are 10 to 30 years for office properties, three to 10 years forequipment, and three years for software. Rent expense related to long-term operating leases is recorded on the accrual basis. - 64 -m)Income Taxes The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated federal and combined state income tax returns. The provision for income taxes is based upon income inthe consolidated financial statements, rather than amounts reported on the income tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the futuretax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases,as well as net operating loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in theyears in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates isrecognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company evaluates the realizability of its deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis. Under generally accepted accounting principles, a valuation allowanceis required to be recognized if it is “more likely than not” that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The determination of the realizability of the deferred taxassets is highly subjective and dependent upon judgment concerning management's evaluation of both positive and negative evidence, the forecasts offuture income, applicable tax planning strategies, and assessments of current and future economic and business conditions.Positions taken in the Company’s tax returns may be subject to challenge by the taxing authorities upon examination. The benefit of uncertain tax positionsare initially recognized in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the taxauthorities. Such tax positions are both initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of beingrealized upon settlement with the tax authority, assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Interest and penalties on income taxuncertainties are classified within income tax expense in the income statement.n)Earnings Per Share Earnings per share (EPS) are computed using the two-class method. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income allocated to commonshareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period, excluding outstanding participatingsecurities. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding adjusted for thedilutive effect of all potential common shares. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue commonstock were exercised. Shares of the Employee Stock Ownership Plan committed to be released are considered outstanding for both common and dilutedEPS. Incentive stock compensation awards granted can result in dilution. o)Comprehensive Income Comprehensive income is the total of reported net income and changes in unrealized gains or losses, net of tax, on securities available for sale. p)Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) Compensation expense under the ESOP is equal to the fair value of common shares released or committed to be released to participants in the ESOP in eachrespective period. Common stock purchased by the ESOP and not committed to be released to participants is included in the consolidated statements offinancial condition at cost as a reduction of shareholders’ equity. q)Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 606 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." Authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 606,"Revenue from Contracts with Customers" amended prior guidance to require an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods orservices to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services and toprovide clarification on identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation guidance. The Company's revenue is comprised of interest andnon-interest revenue. The guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities. The Companycompleted its overall assessment of revenue streams and related contracts affected by the guidance, including asset management fees, deposit related fees,and other non-interest related fees. The Company adopted ASC 606 as of January 1, 2018 with no impact on total shareholders' equity or net income.Revenue Recognition·Debit and credit card interchange fee income - Card processing fees consist of interchange fees from consumer debit and credit card networksand other card related services. Interchange fees are based on purchase volumes and other factors and are recognized as transactions occur.·Service charges on deposit accounts - Revenue from service charges on deposit accounts is earned through deposit-related services; as well asoverdraft, non-sufficient funds, account management and other deposit-related fees. Revenue is recognized for these services either over time,corresponding with deposit accounts' monthly cycle, or at a point in time for transactional related services and fees.·Service charges on loan accounts - Revenue from loan accounts consists primarily of fees earned on prepayment penalties. Revenue isrecognized for these services at a point in time for transactional related services and fees.ASC Topic 825 "Financial Instruments." Authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 825, "Financial Instruments" amended prior guidance torequire equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair valuerecognized in net income. An entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, ifany, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer. Theguidance simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values, requires public entities to use the exit pricenotion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensiveincome the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from changes in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has selectedthe fair value option for financial instruments and requires separate presentation of financial assets and liabilities by measurement category and form offinancial asset. The Company adopted ASC 825 as of January 1, 2018 with no material impact on the Company's statements of operations or financialcondition.- 65 -ASC Topic 842 "Leases." Authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 842, "Leases" amended prior guidance to require lessees to recognize theassets and liabilities arising from all leases on the balance sheet. The authoritative guidance defines a lease as a contract, or part of a contract, that conveysthe right to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment (an identified asset) for a period of time in exchange for consideration. In addition, thequalifications for a sale and leaseback transaction have been amended. The new authoritative guidance also requires qualitative and quantitative disclosuresby lessees and lessors to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arisingfrom leases. In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using aprospective approach. The authoritative guidance will be effective for reporting periods after January 1, 2019. The Company adopted ASC 842 on January 1,2019. The cumulative effect did not have a material impact on the Company's statements of operations. The effect of this guidance increased the statementsof or financial condition by approximately $10.0 million. The Company's adoption of this guidance has not materially changed the method in which wepreviously recognized expense from leases.ASC Topic 718 "Compensation - Stock Compensation." Authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 718, "Compensation - Stock Compensation"amended prior guidance on several aspects, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liability, and classification onthe statement of cash flows. The authoritative guidance allows for all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to be recognized as income tax benefit orexpense in the income statement. The tax effects of exercised or vested awards should be treated as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur.An entity also should recognize excess tax benefits regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the current period. For earnings per share,anticipated excess tax benefits will not be included in assumed proceeds when applying the treasury method for computing dilutive shares. For the statementof cash flows, excess tax benefits should be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity, and cash paid by an employer whendirectly withholding shares for tax withholding purposes should be classified as a financing activity. The authoritative guidance also allows an entity to makean entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures when they occur. Inaddition, the threshold to qualify for equity classification permits withholding up to the maximum statutory tax rates in the applicable jurisdictions. TheCompany adopted this standard on January 1, 2017. See Note 13 for the impact on the Company's statement of operations.ASC Topic 326 "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses." Authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 326, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses"amended the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of abroader range of reasonable and supportable information for credit loss estimates. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevantinformation about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability ofthe reported amount. The authoritative guidance also requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to bepresented at the net amount expected to be collected (net of the allowance for credit losses). In addition, the credit losses relating to available-for-sale debtsecurities should be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than a write-down. The authoritative guidance will be effective for reportingperiods after January 1, 2020. The Company is evaluating the guidance and its impact on the Company's statements of operations and financial condition.Management has met with the necessary departments needed to implement the new accounting guidance. The Company had identified appropriate loanportfolio segments, determined modeling choices to use, and identified historical information needed. A model calculation is in process along with decidingon assumptions within the model. The Company is also working on updating its accounting policies and assessing the control framework needed around thenew standard.ASC Topic 310 "Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs." Authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 310 "Receivables -Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs" amends prior guidance by shortening the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premiumrequiring the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The Company adopted ASC 310 as of January 1, 2019 with no material impact on the Company'sstatements of operations or financial condition.ASC Topic 220 "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income." Authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 220 "Income Statement -Reporting Comprehensive Income" allows Companies to make a one-time reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retainedearnings for the effects of remeasuring deferred income taxes originally recorded in other comprehensive income as a result of the change in the federalincome tax rate by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 with no impact on total shareholders' equity or netincome.- 66 -2)Securities Securities Available for Sale The amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s investment in securities follow: December 31, 2018 Amortized cost Grossunrealizedgains Grossunrealizedlosses Fair value (In Thousands) Mortgage-backed securities $42,105 91 (565) 41,631 Collateralized mortgage obligations Government sponsored enterprise issued 75,923 243 (1,211) 74,955 Mortgage related securities 118,028 334 (1,776) 116,586 Municipal securities 55,242 825 (119) 55,948 Other debt securities 15,002 - (1,816) 13,186 Debt securities 70,244 825 (1,935) 69,134 $188,272 1,159 (3,711) 185,720 December 31, 2017 Amortized cost Grossunrealizedgains Grossunrealizedlosses Fair value (In Thousands) Mortgage-backed securities $57,351 324 (240) 57,435 Collateralized mortgage obligations Government sponsored enterprise issued 61,313 3 (816) 60,500 Mortgage related securities 118,664 327 (1,056) 117,935 Government sponsored enterprise bonds 2,500 - (3) 2,497 Municipal securities 62,516 1,334 (81) 63,769 Other debt securities 15,005 12 (492) 14,525 Debt securities 80,021 1,346 (576) 80,791 Certificates of deposit 980 1 - 981 $199,665 1,674 (1,632) 199,707 The Company’s mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by government sponsored enterprises are guaranteed by one of thefollowing government sponsored enterprises: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae. At December 31, 2018, $1.8 million of the Company's mortgage relatedsecurities were pledged as collateral to secure mortgage banking related activities.The amortized cost and fair value of securities at December 31, 2018, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractualmaturities because issuers or borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties. December 31, 2018 Amortized cost Fair value (In Thousands) Debt securities: Due within one year $6,992 6,963 Due after one year through five years 20,891 20,833 Due after five years through ten years 31,754 32,448 Due after ten years 10,607 8,890 Mortgage-related securities 118,028 116,586 $188,272 185,720 - 67 -Total proceeds and gross gains and losses from sales of investment securities available for sale for each of periods listed below. December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (In Thousands) Gross gains $- - - Gross losses - (107) - Losses on sale of investment securities, net $- (107) - Proceeds from sales of investment securities $- 448 - Gross unrealized losses on securities available for sale and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time thatindividual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, were as follows: December 31, 2018 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total Fairvalue Unrealizedloss Fairvalue Unrealizedloss Fairvalue Unrealizedloss (In Thousands) Mortgage-backed securities $3,036 (9) 33,029 (556) 36,065 (565)Collateralized mortgage obligations Government sponsored enterprise issued 3,079 (13) 47,279 (1,198) 50,358 (1,211)Municipal securities 7,595 (17) 11,272 (102) 18,867 (119)Other debt securities - - 13,186 (1,816) 13,186 (1,816) $13,710 (39) 104,766 (3,672) 118,476 (3,711) December 31, 2017 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total Fairvalue Unrealizedloss Fairvalue Unrealizedloss Fairvalue Unrealizedloss (In Thousands) Mortgage-backed securities $35,136 (143) 4,464 (97) 39,600 (240)Collateralized mortgage obligations Government sponsored enterprise issued 37,949 (348) 21,651 (468) 59,600 (816)Government sponsored enterprise bonds 2,497 (3) - - 2,497 (3)Municipal securities 17,096 (80) 100 (1) 17,196 (81)Other debt securities - - 9,508 (492) 9,508 (492)Certificates of deposit - - - - - - $92,678 (574) 35,723 (1,058) 128,401 (1,632) The Company reviews the investment securities portfolio on a quarterly basis to monitor its exposure to other-than-temporary impairment. In evaluatingwhether a security’s decline in market value is other-than-temporary, management considers the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been lessthan cost, financial condition of the issuer and the underlying obligors, quality of credit enhancements, volatility of the fair value of the security, the expectedrecovery period of the security and ratings agency evaluations. In addition, the Company may also evaluate payment structure, whether there are defaultedpayments or expected defaults, prepayment speeds and the value of any underlying collateral. As of December 31, 2018, the Company identified one municipal security that was deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. The security was issued by atax incremental district in a municipality located in Wisconsin. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company received audited financial statementswith respect to the municipal issuer that called into question the ability of the underlying taxing district that issued the securities to operate as a goingconcern. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company’s analysis of the security in this municipality resulted in $77,000 in credit losses that werecharged to earnings with respect to this municipal security. An additional $17,000 credit loss was charged to earnings during the year ended December 31, 2014with respect to this security as a sale occurred at a discounted price. As of December 31, 2018, the remaining impaired security had an amortized cost of$116,000 and a total life-to-date impairment of $94,000. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had two corporate debt securities, 32 municipal securities, 43 mortgage-backed securities, and 37 governmentsponsored enterprise issued securities which had been in an unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer. These securities were determined not to beother-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2018. The Company has determined that the decline in fair value of these securities is not attributable tocredit deterioration, and as the Company does not intend to sell nor is it more likely than not that it will be required to sell these securities before recovery ofthe amortized cost basis, these securities are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.- 68 -The unrealized losses for the other debt security with an unrealized loss greater than 12 months is due to the current slope of the yield curve. The securitycurrently earns a fixed interest rate but transitions in the future to a floating rate that is indexed to the 10 year Treasury interest rate. The Company does notintend to sell nor does it believe that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of their amortized cost basis.Deterioration of general economic market conditions could result in the recognition of future other-than-temporary impairment losses within the investmentportfolio and such amounts could be material to our consolidated financial statements.There were no sales of securities during the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2017, proceeds fromthe sale of securities totaled $448,000 and resulted in losses totaling $107,000. The $107,000 included in loss on sale of available for sale securities in theconsolidated statements of income during the year ended December 31, 2017 was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income.The following table presents the change in other-than-temporary credit related impairment charges on municipal securities for which a portion of the other-than-temporary impairments related to other factors was recognized in other comprehensive loss. (In Thousands) Credit-related impairments on securities as of December 31, 2016 $94 Credit related impairments related to a security for which other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized $- Decrease in credit related impairments related to securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized - Credit-related impairments on securities as of December 31, 2017 $94 Credit related impairments related to a security for which other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized $- Increase in credit related impairments related to securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized - Credit-related impairments on securities as of December 31, 2018 $94 3)Loans Receivable Loans receivable at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are summarized as follows: December 31, 2018 2017 Mortgage loans: (In Thousands) Residential real estate: One- to four-family $489,979 439,597 Multi family 597,087 578,440 Home equity 19,956 21,124 Construction and land 13,361 19,859 Commercial real estate 225,522 195,842 Consumer 433 255 Commercial loans 32,810 36,697 Total loans receivable $1,379,148 1,291,814 The Company provides several types of loans to its customers, including residential, construction, commercial and consumer loans. Significant loanconcentrations are considered to exist for a financial institution when there are amounts loaned to one borrower or to multiple borrowers engaged in similaractivities that would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. While credit risks tend to be geographically concentrated in theCompany’s Milwaukee metropolitan area and while 80.3% of the Company’s loan portfolio involves loans that are secured by residential real estate, there are noconcentrations with individual or groups of related borrowers. While the real estate collateralizing these loans is primarily residential in nature, it ranges fromowner-occupied single family homes to large apartment complexes. Qualifying loans receivable totaling $1.01 billion and $971.3 million are pledged as collateral against $430.0 million and $375.0 million in outstanding FederalHome Loan Bank of Chicago advances under a blanket security agreement at both December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.Certain of the Company's executive officers, directors, employees, and their related interests have loans with the Bank. As of December 31, 2018 and December31, 2017, loans aggregating approximately $5.3 million and $7.0 million, respectively, were outstanding to such parties. None of these loans were past due orconsidered impaired as of December 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017.- 69 -An analysis of past due loans receivable as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 follows: As of December 31, 2018 1-59 Days PastDue (1) 60-89 Days PastDue (2) Greater Than90Days Total Past Due Current (3) Total Loans Mortgage loans: (In Thousands) Residential real estate: One- to four-family $1,523 76 3,834 5,433 484,546 489,979 Multi family - - 937 937 596,150 597,087 Home equity 216 42 111 369 19,587 19,956 Construction and land - - - - 13,361 13,361 Commercial real estate 39 - 125 164 225,358 225,522 Consumer 29 - - 29 404 433 Commercial loans - - 18 18 32,792 32,810 Total $1,807 118 5,025 6,950 1,372,198 1,379,148 As of December 31, 2017 1-59 Days PastDue (1) 60-89 Days PastDue (2) Greater Than90Days Total Past Due Current (3) Total Loans Mortgage loans: (In Thousands) Residential real estate: One- to four-family $1,494 146 3,516 5,156 434,441 439,597 Multi family - 128 192 320 578,120 578,440 Home equity 68 - 56 124 21,000 21,124 Construction and land - - - - 19,859 19,859 Commercial real estate - - 184 184 195,658 195,842 Consumer - - - - 255 255 Commercial loans - 42 26 68 36,629 36,697 Total $1,562 316 3,974 5,852 1,285,962 1,291,814 (1)Includes $422,000 and $241,000 for December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, which are on non-accrual status.(2)Includes $118,000 and $15,000 for December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, which are on non-accrual status.(3)Includes $990,000 and $1.8 million for December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, which are on non-accrual status.As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were no loans that were 90 or more days past due and still accruing interest.- 70 -A summary of the activity for the years ended 2018, 2017 and 2016 in the allowance for loan losses follows: One- toFour-Family MultiFamily Home Equity Constructionand Land CommercialReal Estate Consumer Commercial Total (In Thousands) Year ended December 31, 2018 Balance at beginning of period $5,794 4,431 356 949 1,881 10 656 14,077 Provision (credit) for loanlosses (142) (353) (56) (589) 243 10 (173) (1,060)Charge-offs (69) (14) (1) - - - - (84)Recoveries 159 89 26 40 2 - - 316 Balance at end of period $5,742 4,153 325 400 2,126 20 483 13,249 Year ended December 31, 2017 Balance at beginning of period $7,164 4,809 364 1,016 1,951 12 713 16,029 Provision (credit) for loanlosses (299) (494) (34) (215) (64) (3) (57) (1,166)Charge-offs (1,364) (92) - (14) (7) - - (1,477)Recoveries 293 208 26 162 1 1 - 691 Balance at end of period $5,794 4,431 356 949 1,881 10 656 14,077 Year ended December 31, 2016 Balance at beginning of period $7,763 5,000 433 904 1,680 9 396 16,185 Provision for loan losses (407) 146 7 43 271 3 317 380 Charge-offs (1,003) (489) (112) (3) - - - (1,607)Recoveries 811 152 36 72 - - - 1,071 Balance at end of period $7,164 4,809 364 1,016 1,951 12 713 16,029 A summary of the allowance for loan loss for loans evaluated individually and collectively for impairment by collateral class as of the year ended December 31,2018 follows: One- toFour-Family MultiFamily Home Equity Constructionand Land CommercialReal Estate Consumer Commercial Total (In Thousands) Allowance related to loansindividually evaluated forimpairment $73 - 46 - 67 - - 186 Allowance related to loanscollectively evaluated forimpairment 5,669 4,153 279 400 2,059 20 483 13,063 Balance at end of period $5,742 4,153 325 400 2,126 20 483 13,249 Loans individually evaluated forimpairment $7,642 1,309 246 - 2,885 - 18 12,100 Loans collectively evaluated forimpairment 482,337 595,778 19,710 13,361 222,637 433 32,792 1,367,048 Total gross loans $489,979 597,087 19,956 13,361 225,522 433 32,810 1,379,148 - 71 -A summary of the allowance for loan loss for loans evaluated individually and collectively for impairment by collateral class as of the year ended December 31,2017 follows: One- toFour-Family MultiFamily Home Equity Constructionand Land CommercialReal Estate Consumer Commercial Total (In Thousands) Allowance related to loansindividually evaluated forimpairment $77 - 44 - 34 - - 155 Allowance related to loanscollectively evaluated forimpairment 5,717 4,431 312 949 1,847 10 656 13,922 Balance at end of period $5,794 4,431 356 949 1,881 10 656 14,077 Loans individually evaluated forimpairment $7,418 1,007 185 - 540 - 26 9,176 Loans collectively evaluated forimpairment 432,179 577,433 20,939 19,859 195,302 255 36,671 1,282,638 Total gross loans $439,597 578,440 21,124 19,859 195,842 255 36,697 1,291,814 The following table presents information relating to the Company’s internal risk ratings of its loans receivable as of December 31, 2018 and 2017: One- to Four-Family MultiFamily Home Equity Constructionand Land CommercialReal Estate Consumer Commercial Total At December 31, 2018(In Thousands) Substandard $7,799 1,309 246 - 678 - 889 10,921 Watch 4,662 491 468 - 4,343 - 906 10,870 Pass 477,518 595,287 19,242 13,361 220,501 433 31,015 1,357,357 $489,979 597,087 19,956 13,361 225,522 433 32,810 1,379,148 At December 31, 2017(In Thousands) Substandard $7,581 1,135 138 - 1,124 - 1,585 11,563 Watch 4,939 330 401 - 295 - 741 6,706 Pass 427,077 576,975 20,585 19,859 194,423 255 34,371 1,273,545 $439,597 578,440 21,124 19,859 195,842 255 36,697 1,291,814 Factors that are important to managing overall credit quality include sound loan underwriting and administration, systematic monitoring of existing loans andcommitments, effective loan review on an ongoing basis, early identification of potential problems, an allowance for loan losses, and sound non-accrual andcharge-off policies. Our underwriting policies require an officers' loan committee review and approval of all loans in excess of $500,000. A member of thecredit department, independent of the loan originator, performs a loan review for all loans. Our ability to manage credit risk depends in large part on our abilityto properly identify and manage problem loans. To do so, we maintain a loan review system under which our credit management personnel review non-owneroccupied one- to four-family, multi-family, construction and land, and commercial real estate that individually, or as part of an overall borrower relationshipexceed $1.0 million in potential exposure and review commercial loans that individually, or as part of an overall borrower relationship exceed $200,000 inpotential exposure. Loans meeting these criteria are reviewed on an annual basis, or more frequently, if the loan renewal is less than one year. With respectto this review process, management has determined that pass loans include loans that exhibit acceptable financial statements, cash flow and leverage. Watchloans have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s attention, and if left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of therepayment prospects for the credit. Substandard loans are considered inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor orthe collateral pledged. These loans generally have a well-defined weakness that may jeopardize liquidation of the debt and are characterized by the distinctpossibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Finally, a loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable that theBank will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Management has determined that all non-accrualloans and loans modified under troubled debt restructurings meet the definition of an impaired loan.The Company’s procedures dictate that an updated valuation must be obtained with respect to underlying collateral at the time a loan is deemedimpaired. Updated valuations may also be obtained upon transfer from loans receivable to real estate owned based upon the age of the prior appraisal,changes in market conditions or known changes to the physical condition of the property.- 72 -Estimated fair values are reduced to account for sales commissions, broker fees, unpaid property taxes and additional selling expenses to arrive at anestimated net realizable value. The adjustment factor is based upon the Company’s actual experience with respect to sales of real estate owned over the priortwo years. In situations in which we are placing reliance on an appraisal that is more than one year old, an additional adjustment factor is applied to accountfor downward market pressure since the date of appraisal. The additional adjustment factor is based upon relevant sales data available for our generaloperating market as well as company-specific historical net realizable values as compared to the most recent appraisal prior to disposition.With respect to over-four family income producing real estate, appraisals are reviewed and estimated collateral values are adjusted by updating significantappraisal assumptions to reflect current real estate market conditions. Significant assumptions reviewed and updated include the capitalization rate, rentalincome and operating expenses. These adjusted assumptions are based upon recent appraisals received on similar properties as well as on actual experiencerelated to real estate owned and currently under Company management.The following tables present data on impaired loans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. As of or for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 RecordedInvestment UnpaidPrincipal Reserve CumulativeCharge-Offs AverageRecordedInvestment Interest PaidYTD Total Impaired with Reserve One- to four-family $462 462 73 - 470 32 Multi family - - - - - - Home equity 107 107 46 - 110 7 Construction and land - - - - - - Commercial real estate 2,493 2,902 67 409 4,058 181 Consumer - - - - - - Commercial - - - - - - $3,062 3,471 186 409 4,638 220 Total Impaired with no Reserve One- to four-family $7,180 8,120 - 940 7,355 383 Multi family 1,309 2,142 - 833 1,351 96 Home equity 139 139 - - 144 5 Construction and land - - - - - - Commercial real estate 392 392 - - 431 15 Consumer - - - - - - Commercial 18 18 - - 25 - $9,038 10,811 - 1,773 9,306 499 Total Impaired One- to four-family $7,642 8,582 73 940 7,825 415 Multi family 1,309 2,142 - 833 1,351 96 Home equity 246 246 46 - 254 12 Construction and land - - - - - - Commercial real estate 2,885 3,294 67 409 4,489 196 Consumer - - - - - - Commercial 18 18 - - 25 - $12,100 14,282 186 2,182 13,944 719 - 73 - As of or for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 RecordedInvestment UnpaidPrincipal Reserve CumulativeCharge-Offs AverageRecordedInvestment Interest PaidYTD Total Impaired with Reserve One- to four-family $903 903 77 - 913 52 Multi family - - - - - - Home equity 79 79 44 - 83 6 Construction and land - - - - - - Commercial real estate 34 443 34 409 43 - Consumer - - - - - - Commercial - - - - - - $1,016 1,425 155 409 1,039 58 Total Impaired with no Reserve One- to four-family $6,515 7,604 - 1,089 6,796 359 Multi family 1,007 1,864 - 857 1,005 94 Home equity 106 106 - - 111 5 Construction and land - - - - - - Commercial real estate 506 506 - - 513 19 Consumer - - - - - - Commercial 26 26 - - 26 - $8,160 10,106 - 1,946 8,451 477 Total Impaired One- to four-family $7,418 8,507 77 1,089 7,709 411 Multi family 1,007 1,864 - 857 1,005 94 Home equity 185 185 44 - 194 11 Construction and land - - - - - - Commercial real estate 540 949 34 409 556 19 Consumer - - - - - - Commercial 26 26 - - 26 - $9,176 11,531 155 2,355 9,490 535 The difference between a loan’s recorded investment and the unpaid principal balance represents a partial charge-off resulting from a confirmed loss due to thevalue of the collateral securing the loan being below the loan balance and management’s assessment that the full collection of the loan balance is not likely.When a loan is considered impaired, interest payments received are treated as interest income on a cash basis as long as the remaining book value of the loan(i.e., after charge-off of all identified losses) is deemed to be fully collectible. If the remaining book value is not deemed to be fully collectible, all paymentsreceived are applied to unpaid principal. Determination as to the ultimate collectability of the remaining book value is supported by an updated creditdepartment evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition and prospects for repayment, including consideration of the borrower’s sustained historicalrepayment performance and other relevant factors.The determination as to whether an allowance is required with respect to impaired loans is based upon an analysis of the value of the underlying collateraland/or the borrower’s intent and ability to make all principal and interest payments in accordance with contractual terms. The evaluation process is subject tothe use of significant estimates and actual results could differ from estimates. This analysis is primarily based upon third party appraisals and/or a discountedcash flow analysis. In those cases in which no allowance has been provided for an impaired loan, the Company has determined that the estimated value of theunderlying collateral exceeds the remaining outstanding balance of the loan. Of the total $9.0 million of impaired loans as of December 31, 2018 for which noallowance has been provided, $1.8 million in charge-offs have been recorded to reduce the unpaid principal balance to an amount that is commensurate with theloan’s net realizable value, using the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. To the extent that further deterioration in property values continues, theCompany may have to reevaluate the sufficiency of the collateral servicing these impaired loans resulting in additional provisions to the allowance for loanslosses or charge-offs. - 74 -The following presents data on troubled debt restructurings: As of December 31, 2018 Accruing Non-accruing Total Amount Number Amount Number Amount Number (Dollars in Thousands) One- to four-family $2,740 2 $844 5 $3,584 7 Multi family - - 372 2 372 2 Commercial real estate 2,759 2 17 1 2,776 3 $5,499 4 $1,233 8 $6,732 12 As of December 31, 2017 Accruing Non-accruing Total Amount Number Amount Number Amount Number (Dollars in Thousands) One- to four-family $2,740 2 $1,156 7 $3,896 9 Multi family - - 815 3 815 3 Home equity 47 1 - - 47 1 Commercial real estate 290 1 34 1 324 2 $3,077 4 $2,005 11 $5,082 15 Troubled debt restructurings involve granting concessions to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty by modifying the terms of the loan in an effort toavoid foreclosure. Typical restructured terms include six to twelve months of principal forbearance, a reduction in interest rate or both. In no instances havethe restructured terms included a reduction of outstanding principal balance. At December 31, 2018, $6.7 million in loans had been modified in troubled debtrestructurings and $1.2 million of these loans were included in the non-accrual loan total. The remaining $5.5 million, while meeting the internal requirements formodification in a troubled debt restructuring, were current with respect to payments under their original loan terms at the time of the restructuring and thus,continued to be included with accruing loans. Provided these loans perform in accordance with the modified terms, they will continue to be accounted for onan accrual basis.All loans that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring are considered to be impaired. As such, an analysis has been performed with respect to all ofthese loans to determine the need for a valuation reserve. When a loan is expected to perform in accordance with the restructured terms and ultimately return toand perform under contract terms, a valuation allowance is established equal to the excess of the present value of the expected future cash flows under theoriginal contract terms as compared with the modified terms, including an estimated default rate. When there is doubt as to the borrower’s ability to performunder the restructured terms or ultimately return to and perform under market terms, a valuation allowance is established equal to the impairment when thecarrying amount exceeds fair value of the underlying collateral. As a result of the impairment analysis, a $67,000 valuation allowance has been established as ofDecember 31, 2018 with respect to the $6.7 million in troubled debt restructurings. As of December 31, 2017, $34,000 in valuation allowance had beenestablished with respect to the $5.1 million in troubled debt restructurings.If an updated credit department review indicates no other evidence of elevated credit risk and the borrower completes a minimum of six consecutive contractualpayments, the loan is returned to accrual status at that time. The following presents troubled debt restructurings by concession type at December 31, 2018 and 2017: As of December 31, 2018 Performing inaccordance withmodified terms In Default Total Amount Number Amount Number Amount Number (Dollars in Thousands) Interest reduction and principal forbearance $5,848 7 546 2 6,394 9 Interest reduction 338 3 - - 338 3 $6,186 10 546 2 6,732 12 As of December 31, 2017 Performing inaccordance withmodified terms In Default Total Amount Number Amount Number Amount Number (Dollars in Thousands) Interest reduction and principal forbearance $4,022 9 660 2 4,682 11 Principal forbearance 47 1 - - 47 1 Interest reduction 353 3 - - 353 3 $4,422 13 660 2 5,082 15 - 75 -The following presents data on troubled debt restructurings: For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Amount Number Amount Number (Dollars in Thousands) Loans modified as a troubled debt restructure Commercial real estate $2,476 1 - - $2,476 1 - - There were no troubled debt restructurings within the past twelve months for which there was a default during the year ended December 31, 2018.The following table presents data on non-accrual loans: As of December 31, 2018 2017 (Dollars in Thousands) Residential One- to four-family $4,902 4,677 Multi family 1,309 1,007 Home equity 201 107 Construction and land - - Commercial real estate 125 251 Commercial 18 26 Consumer - - Total non-accrual loans $6,555 6,068 Total non-accrual loans to total loans 0.48% 0.47%Total non-accrual loans to total assets 0.34% 0.34%4)Office Properties and Equipment Office properties and equipment are summarized as follows: December 31, 2018 2017 (In Thousands) Land $7,357 6,668 Office buildings and improvements 32,473 30,587 Furniture and equipment 13,518 13,585 53,348 50,840 Less accumulated depreciation (28,824) (27,899) $24,524 22,941 Depreciation of premises and equipment totaled $2.3 million, $2.1 million and $2.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. - 76 -The Company and certain subsidiaries are obligated under non-cancelable operating leases for other facilities and equipment. Rent and equipment leaseexpense totaled $5.2 million, $4.8 million and $4.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The appropriate minimum annualcommitments under all non-cancelable lease agreements as of December 31, 2018 are as follows: Operatingleases (In Thousands) Within one year $3,454 One to two years 2,598 Two to three years 1,626 Three to four years 1,021 Four through five years 792 After five years 914 Total $10,405 5)Real Estate Owned Real estate owned is summarized as follows: December 31, 2018 2017 (In Thousands) One- to four-family $163 1,330 Multi-family - - Construction and land 3,327 4,582 Commercial real estate 300 300 Total 3,790 6,212 Valuation allowance at end of period (1,638) (1,654)Total real estate owned, net $2,152 4,558 The following table presents the activity in real estate owned: Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 (In Thousands) Real estate owned at beginning of period $4,558 6,118 Transferred in from loans receivable 545 2,171 Sales (2,642) (3,213)Write downs (309) (514)Other activity - (4)Real estate owned at end of period $2,152 4,558 Residential one- to four-family mortgage loans that were in the process of foreclosure were $2.2 million and $2.3 million at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017,respectively.- 77 -6)Mortgage Servicing Rights The following table presents the activity related to the Company’s mortgage servicing rights: Year ended December 31, 2018 2017 (In Thousands) Mortgage servicing rights at beginning of the period $888 $2,260 Additions 427 998 Amortization (191) (106)Sales (1,015) (2,264)Mortgage servicing rights at end of the period 109 888 Valuation allowance at end of period - - Mortgage servicing rights at the end of the period, net $109 $888 During the year ended December 31, 2018, on a consolidated basis, $2.51 billion in residential loans were originated for sale, which excludes the loans originated fromWaterstone Mortgage Corporation and purchased by WaterStone Bank. During the same period, sales of loans held for sale totaled $2.52 billion, generating mortgagebanking income of $113.2 million. The unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for others was $14.1 million and $126.3 million at December 31, 2018 and December 31,2017 respectively. These loans are not reflected in the consolidated statements of financial condition.During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company sold mortgage servicing rights related to $148.7 million in loans receivable and with a book value of $1.0million for $1.4 million resulting in a gain on sale of $417,000. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company sold mortgage servicing rights related to $295.1million in loans receivable and with a book value of $2.3 million for $2.5 million resulting in a gain on sale of $178,000.The following table shows the estimated future amortization expense for mortgage servicing rights at December 31, 2018 for the periods indicated: (In Thousands) Estimate for the years ended December 31:2019 $25 2020 21 2021 18 2022 15 2023 12 Thereafter 18 Total $109 7)Deposits The aggregate amount of time deposit accounts with balances greater than $250,000 at December 31, 2018 and 2017 amounted to $60.1 million and $45.9 million,respectively. A summary of interest expense on deposits is as follows: Years ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (In Thousands) Interest-bearing demand deposits $33 28 19 Money market and savings deposits 599 401 392 Time deposits 10,995 7,310 6,953 $11,627 7,739 7,364 A summary of the contractual maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2018 is as follows: (In Thousands) Within one year $472,540 One to two years 238,524 Two to three years 21,573 Three to four years 2,245 Four through five years 991 $735,873 - 78 -8)Borrowings Borrowings consist of the following: December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Balance WeightedAverageRate Balance WeightedAverageRate (Dollars in Thousands) Short term: Repurchase agreements $5,046 5.39% 11,285 4.32% Federal Home Loan Bank, Chicago advances - - 35,000 1.28% Long term: Federal Home Loan Bank advances maturing: 2018 - - 65,000 2.97%2021 - - 100,000 0.78%2027 175,000 1.38% 175,000 1.38%2028 255,000 2.37% - - $435,046 2.01% 386,285 1.57%The short-term repurchase agreements represents the outstanding portion of a total $35.0 million commitment with one unrelated bank. The short-termrepurchase agreement is utilized by Waterstone Mortgage Corporation to finance loans originated for sale. This agreement is secured by the underlying loansbeing financed. Related interest rates are based upon the note rate associated with the loans being financed. The short-term repurchase agreement had a $5.0million balance on a total commitment of $35.0 million at December 31, 2018. The $175.0 million in advances due in 2027 consists of one $50.0 million advance with a fixed rate of 1.24% with a FHLB single call option in May 2019, one $50.0million advance with a fixed rate of 1.23% with a FHLB single call option in June 2019, one $25.0 million advance with a fixed rate of 1.23% with a FHLB singlecall option in August 2019, and one $50.0 million advance with a fixed rate of 1.73% with a FHLB single call option in December 2019.The $255.0 million in advances due in 2028 consists of one $25.0 million advance with a fixed rate of 2.16% with a FHLB single call option in March 2020, twoadvances totaling $55.0 million with a fixed rate of 2.27% and with a FHLB single call option in March 2021, one advance of $25.0 million with a fixed rate of2.40% and with a FHLB single call option in May 2020, two advances totaling $50.0 million with fixed rates of 2.34% and 2.48% and with a FHLB single calloption in May 2021, one advance of $50.0 million with a fixed rate of 2.34% and with a FHLB quarterly call option beginning in June 2020, and one advance of$50.0 million with a fixed rate of 2.57% and with a FHLB quarterly call option beginning in September 2020. The Company selects loans that meet underwriting criteria established by the Federal Home Loan Bank Chicago (FHLBC) as collateral for outstandingadvances. The Company’s borrowings at the FHLBC are limited to 80% of the carrying value of unencumbered one- to four-family mortgage loans, 64% of thecarrying value of home equity loans and 75% of the carrying value of over four-family loans. In addition, these advances are collateralized by FHLBC stock of$19.4 million at December 31, 2018 and $16.9 million at December 31, 2017. In the event of prepayment, the Company is obligated to pay all remaining contractualinterest on the advance.9)Regulatory Capital The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capitalrequirements, or overall financial performance deemed by the regulators to be inadequate, can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actionsby regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Under capital adequacy guidelinesand the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company's andBank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company's and Bank’s capital amounts andclassification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC issued final rules implementing the Basel III regulatory capital framework and related Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform andConsumer Protection Act changes. The rules revise minimum capital requirements and adjust prompt corrective action thresholds. The final rules revised theregulatory capital elements, added a new common equity Tier I capital ratio, increased the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio requirements and implemented a new capitalconservation buffer. The rules also permitted certain banking organizations to retain, through a one-time election, the existing treatment for accumulated othercomprehensive income. The Company and the Bank have made the election to retain the existing treatment for accumulated other comprehensive income. The finalrules took effect for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015, subject to a transition period for certain parts of the rules.In addition, as a result of the legislation, the federal banking agencies are required to develop a "Community Bank Leverage Ratio" (the ratio of a bank's tangibleequity capital to average total consolidated assets) for financial institutions with assets of less than $10 billion. A "qualifying community bank" that exceeds this ratiowill be deemed to be in compliance with all other capital and leverage requirements, including the capital requirements to be considered "well capitalized" underPrompt Corrective Action statutes. The federal banking agencies may consider a financial institution's risk profile when evaluating whether it qualifies as a communitybank for purposes of the capital ratio requirement. The federal banking agencies must set the minimum capital for the new Community Bank Leverage Ratio at not lessthan 8% and not more than 10%. A financial institution can elect to be subject to this new definition.- 79 -The table below includes the new regulatory capital ratio requirements that became effective on January 1, 2015. Beginning in 2016, an additional capital conservationbuffer was added to the minimum requirements for capital adequacy purposes, subject to a three year phase-in period. The capital conservation buffer will be fullyphased-in on January 1, 2019 at 2.5%. A banking organization with a conservation buffer of less than 2.5% (or the required phase-in amount in years prior to 2019) willbe subject to limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. At December 31, 2018,the ratios for the Company and the Bank are sufficient to meet the fully phased-in conservation buffer.The actual and required capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 are presented in the table below: December 31, 2018 Actual For CapitalAdequacy Purposes Minimum Capital Adequacywith Capital Buffer To Be Well-CapitalizedUnder Prompt CorrectiveAction Provisions Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio (Dollars In Thousands) Total capital (to risk-weightedassets) Consolidated WaterstoneFinancial , Inc. $414,566 28.22% 117,506 8.00% 145,046 9.880% N/A N/A WaterStone Bank 395,783 26.95% 117,490 8.00% 145,027 9.880% 146,863 10.00%Tier I capital (to risk-weightedassets) Consolidated WaterstoneFinancial , Inc. 401,317 27.32% 88,130 6.00% 115,670 7.880% N/A N/A WaterStone Bank 382,534 26.05% 88,118 6.00% 115,655 7.880% 117,490 8.00%Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (torisk-weighted assets) Consolidated WaterstoneFinancial , Inc. 401,317 27.32% 66,097 4.50% 93,638 6.380% N/A N/A WaterStone Bank 382,534 26.05% 66,088 4.50% 93,625 6.380% 95,461 6.50%Tier I capital (to average assets) Consolidated WaterstoneFinancial , Inc. 401,317 21.06% 76,214 4.00% N/A N/A N/A N/A WaterStone Bank 382,534 20.08% 76,214 4.00% N/A N/A 95,268 5.00%State of Wisconsin (to totalassets) WaterStone Bank 382,534 20.01% 114,712 6.00% N/A N/A N/A N/A December 31, 2017 (Dollars In Thousands) Total capital (to risk-weightedassets) Consolidated WaterstoneFinancial , Inc. $426,057 30.75% 110,829 8.00% 128,146 9.25% N/A N/A WaterStone Bank 400,792 28.93% 110,812 8.00% 128,127 9.25% 138,515 10.00%Tier I capital (to risk-weightedassets) Consolidated WaterstoneFinancial , Inc. 411,980 29.74% 83,122 6.00% 100,439 7.25% N/A N/A WaterStone Bank 386,715 27.92% 83,109 6.00% 100,424 7.25% 110,812 8.00%Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (torisk-weighted assets) Consolidated WaterstoneFinancial , Inc. 411,980 29.74% 62,341 4.50% 79,658 5.75% N/A N/A WaterStone Bank 386,715 27.92% 62,332 4.50% 79,646 5.75% 90,035 6.50%Tier I capital (to average assets) Consolidated WaterstoneFinancial , Inc. 411,980 22.43% 73,481 4.00% N/A N/A N/A N/A WaterStone Bank 386,715 21.10% 73,304 4.00% N/A N/A 91,630 5.00%State of Wisconsin (to totalassets) WaterStone Bank 386,715 21.44% 108,243 6.00% N/A N/A N/A N/A - 80 -10)Stock Based Compensation Stock-Based Compensation Plan In 2006, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. All stock awards granted under this plan vest over a period of five years andare required to be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock. The exercise price for all stock options granted is equal to the quoted NASDAQ marketclosing price on the date that the awards were granted and expire ten years after the grant date, if not exercised. All restricted stock grants are issued frompreviously unissued shares.In 2015, the Company's shareholders approved the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. A total of 2,530,000 stock options and 1,012,000 restricted shares were approvedfor award. A total of 1,317,000 stock options and 466,000 restricted stock are available to be issued as of December 31, 2018. The stock options granted toemployees under this plan typically vest over a period of five years. The stock option awards granted to directors under this plan vest over a period of eightyears. The exercise price for all stock options granted is equal to the quoted NASDAQ market close price on the date that the awards were granted and expireten years after the grant date, if not exercised. The restricted stock awards granted to employees under this plan vest in five installments over four years withone installment vesting immediately. The stock awards granted to directors under this plan vest in eight installments over seven years with one installmentvesting immediately. The fair value of the restricted stock awards were equal to the quoted NASDAQ market closing price on the vest date. Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Plan The fair value of stock options granted is estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes pricing model. The fair value of restricted shares is equal to thequoted NASDAQ market closing price on the date of grant. The fair value of stock grants is recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis overthe vesting period of the grants. Compensation expense is included in compensation, payroll taxes and other employee benefits in the consolidated statementsof income.Assumptions are used in estimating the fair value of stock options granted. The weighted average expected life of the stock options represent the period oftime that the options are expected to be outstanding and is based on the historical results from the previous awards. The risk-free interest rate is based on theU.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected volatility is based on the actual volatility of Waterstone Financial, Inc. stock for theweighted average life time period prior to issuance date. The following assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of options granted in the years endedDecember 31, 2018 and 2017. 2018 2017 Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Dividend Yield 2.70% 2.74% 2.48% 2.71%Risk-free interest rate 2.57% 2.96% 1.80% 1.93%Expected volatility 16.27% 30.88% 27.79% 32.54%Weighted average expected life 5.4 6.2 5.3 5.5 Weighted average per share value of options $1.97 4.26 4.01 4.63 The Company adjusts compensation expense at time of actual stock grant forfeiture. - 81 -A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is presented below.Stock Options Shares WeightedAverageExercise Price WeightedAverageYearsRemaining inContractualTerm AggregateIntrinsic Value(000's) Outstanding December 31, 2015 2,103,047 $12.90 6.15 2,533 Options exercisable at December 31, 2015 810,255 14.25 1.63 (123) Granted 55,000 15.54 151 Exercised (736,548) 15.04 2,388 Forfeited (59,000) 13.15 303 Outstanding December 31, 2016 1,362,499 11.83 7.74 8,785 Options exercisable at December 31, 2016 304,595 9.66 6.44 2,625 Granted 20,000 18.78 (35)Exercised (211,205) 6.48 2,233 Forfeited (12,195) 14.83 27 Outstanding December 31, 2017 1,159,099 12.89 7.24 4,870 Options exercisable at December 31, 2017 331,097 12.53 7.10 1,501 Granted 80,000 17.23 3 Exercised (106,030) 12.30 473 Forfeited (72,000) 13.97 224 Outstanding December 31, 2018 1,061,069 13.21 6.47 3,850 Options exercisable at December 31, 2018 421,068 12.78 6.23 1,688 The following table summarizes information about the Company's stock options outstanding at December 31, 2018. OptionsOutstanding WeightedAverageExercise Price RemainingLife(Years) OptionsExercisable WeightedAverageExercise Price RemainingLife(Years) Range of ExercisePrices $0.01 - $5.00 4,237 $1.73 3.01 4,237 $1.73 3.01 $5.01 - $10.00 - - - - - - $10.01 - $15.00 956,832 12.82 6.22 408,831 12.82 6.22 Over $15.01 100,000 17.54 9.05 8,000 18.23 8.23 1,061,069 $13.21 6.47 421,068 $12.78 6.23 - 82 -The following table summarizes information about the Company’s nonvested stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017: Stock Options Shares WeightedAverageGrant Date FairValue Nonvested at December 31, 2016 1,057,904 $3.16 Granted 20,000 4.26 Vested (237,707) 2.87 Forfeited (12,195) 3.55 Nonvested at December 31, 2017 828,002 3.27 Nonvested at December 31, 2017 828,002 3.27 Granted 80,000 3.66 Vested (200,001) 3.27 Forfeited (68,000) 3.46 Nonvested at December 31, 2018 640,001 3.30 The Company amortizes the expense related to stock options as compensation expense over the vesting period. During the year ended December 31, 2018,80,000 options were granted, 72,000 were forfeited, of which 4,000 were vested. During the year ended December 31, 2017, 20,000 options were granted, 12,195were forfeited, of which none were vested. During the year ended December 31, 2016, 55,000 options were granted and 59,000 were forfeited, of which nonewere vested. Expense for the stock options granted of $608,000, $638,000 and $641,000 was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and2016, respectively. At December 31, 2018, the Company had $1.7 million in estimated unrecognized compensation costs related to outstanding stock optionsthat is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 27 months.The following table summarizes information about the Company’s restricted stock shares activity for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017: Restricted Stock Shares WeightedAverageGrant Date FairValue Nonvested at December 31, 2016 378,762 $12.39 Granted - - Vested (119,562) 11.39 Forfeited - - Nonvested at December 31, 2017 259,200 12.85 Nonvested at December 31, 2017 259,200 12.85 Granted - - Vested (93,100) 12.84 Forfeited (3,500) 12.75 Nonvested at December 31, 2018 162,600 12.85 The Company amortizes the expense related to restricted stock awards as compensation expense over the vesting period. During the year ended December 31,2018, no shares of restricted stock were granted and 3,500 shares were forfeited. During the year ended December 31, 2017, no shares of restricted stock weregranted and no shares were forfeited. Expense for the restricted stock awards of $1.2 million, $1.3 million and $1.3 million was recorded for the years endedDecember 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2018, the Company had $1.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related torestricted stock shares that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 32 months.11)Employee Benefit Plans The Company has two 401(k) profit sharing plans and trusts covering substantially all employees. WaterStone Bank employees over 18 years of age areimmediately eligible to participate in the Bank’s plan. Waterstone Mortgage employees over 18 years of age are eligible to participate in its plan as of the first ofthe month following their date of employment. Participating employees may annually contribute pretax compensation in accordance with IRS limits. TheCompany made matching contributions of $971,000, $825,000 and $759,000 to the plans during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 respectively. - 83 -12)Employee Stock Ownership Plan All employees are eligible to participate in the WaterStone Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “Plan”) after they attain twenty one years of age andcomplete twelve consecutive months of service in which they work at least 1,000 hours of service. The Plan debt is secured by shares of the Company. TheCompany has committed to make annual contributions to the Plan necessary to repay the loan, including interest. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Plan borrowed an additional $23.8 million from the Company, refinanced the remaining 83,561 shares (related tothe 2005 Plan purchase), and purchased an additional 2,024,000 shares of common stock of the Company in the open market. While the shares are not releasedand allocated to Plan participants until the loan payment is made, the shares are deemed to be earned and are therefore, committed to be released throughoutthe service period. As such, one-twentieth of the total 2,107,561 shares are scheduled to be released annually as shares are earned over a period of twentyyears, beginning with the period ended December 31, 2014. As the debt is repaid, shares are released from collateral and allocated to active participantaccounts. The shares pledged as collateral are reported as “Unearned ESOP shares” in the consolidated statement of financial condition. As shares arecommitted to be released from collateral, the Company reports compensation expense equal to the average fair market price of the shares, and the sharesbecome outstanding for earnings per share computations. Compensation expense attributed to the ESOP was $1.8 million, $2.0 million and $1.6 million,respectively for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. The aggregate activity in the number of unearned ESOP shares, considering the allocation of those shares committed to be released as of December 31, 2018and 2017 is as follows: 2018 2017 Beginning ESOP shares 1,686,049 1,791,427 Shares committed to be released (105,378) (105,378)Unreleased shares 1,580,671 1,686,049 Fair value of unreleased shares (in millions) $26.5 28.7 - 84 -13)Income TaxesThe provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 consists of the following: Years ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (In Thousands) Current: Federal $7,087 13,028 12,255 State 1,904 2,362 2,643 8,991 15,390 14,898 Deferred: Federal 452 2,960 1,084 State 83 119 480 535 3,079 1,564 Total $9,526 18,469 16,462 The income tax provisions differ from that computed at the Federal statutory corporate tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 as follows: Years ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (Dollars In Thousands) Income before income taxes $40,280 44,433 41,994 Tax at Federal statutory rate (21% in 2018, 35% in 2017 and 2016) 8,459 15,552 14,698 Add (deduct) effect of: State income taxes net of Federal income tax benefit 1,570 1,613 2,030 Cash surrender value of life insurance (388) (632) (619)Non-deductible ESOP and stock option expense 188 380 268 Tax-exempt interest income (248) (449) (529)Non-deductible compensation 177 280 254 Stock option write off - - 773 Deferred tax asset revaluation - 2,644 - Stock compensation (160) (1,074) (517)Other (72) 155 104 Income tax provision 9,526 18,469 16,462 Effective tax rate 23.6% 41.6% 39.2%The significant components of the Company’s net deferred tax assets (liabilities) included in prepaid expenses and other assets are as follows at December 31,2018 and 2017: December 31, 2018 2017 Gross deferred tax assets: (In Thousands) Fixed assets $- 480 Restricted stock and stock options 526 466 Allowance for loan losses 3,239 3,451 Repurchase reserve for loans sold 139 159 Real estate owned 741 993 Nonaccrual interest 292 305 Capital loss carryforward 23 - Unrealized loss on impaired securities 23 23 Unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net 695 - Other 98 192 Total gross deferred tax assets 5,776 6,069 Gross deferred tax liabilities: Excess tax depreciation (28) - Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net - (11)Mortgage servicing rights (29) (119)FHLB stock (68) (232)Deferred loan fees (475) (703)Deferred liabilities (600) (1,065)Net deferred tax assets $5,176 5,004 - 85 -The Company had a Wisconsin net operating loss carry forward of $24,000 at December 31, 2018 which will begin to expire in 2028. The Company has no capitalloss carryforwards as of December 31, 2017. Under the Internal Revenue Code and Wisconsin Statutes, the Company was permitted to deduct, for tax years beginning before 1988, an annual addition to areserve for bad debts. This amount differs from the provision for loan losses recorded for financial accounting purposes. Under prior law, bad debt deductionsfor income tax purposes were included in taxable income of later years only if the bad debt reserves were used for purposes other than to absorb bad debtlosses. Because the Company did not intend to use the reserve for purposes other than to absorb losses, no deferred income taxes were provided. Retainedearnings at December 31, 2018 include approximately $16.7 million for which no deferred Federal or state income taxes were provided. Deferred income taxeshave been provided on certain additions to the tax reserve for bad debts. The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated federal and combined state tax returns. One subsidiary also files separate state income tax returns in certainstates. The Company is no longer subject to state income tax examinations by certain state tax authorities for years before 2014 or subject to federal taxexaminations for the years before 2015.As a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was enacted into law on December 22, 2017, the Company revalued its net deferred tax asset to reflect thereduction in its federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. This revaluation resulted in a one-time income tax expense of approximately $2.7 millionduring the fourth quarter of 2017.14) Offsetting of Assets and LiabilitiesThe Company enters into agreements under which it sells securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities. In addition, theCompany enters into agreements under which it sells loans held for sale subject to an obligation to repurchase the same loans. Under these arrangements,the Company may transfer legal control over the assets but still retain effective control through an agreement that both entitles and obligates the Company torepurchase the assets. As a result, these repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized financing arrangements (i.e., secured borrowings) and notas a sale and subsequent repurchase of assets. The obligation to repurchase the assets is reflected as a liability in the Company's consolidated statements ofcondition, while the securities and loans held for sale underlying the repurchase agreements remain in the respective investment securities and loans held forsale asset accounts. In other words, there is no offsetting or netting of the investment securities or loans held for sale assets with the repurchase agreementliabilities. The Company's repurchase agreements are subject to master netting agreements, which sets forth the rights and obligations for repurchase andoffset. Under the master netting agreement, the Company is entitled to set off the collateral placed with a single counterparty against obligations owed to thatcounterparty.The following table presents the liabilities subject to an enforceable master netting agreement as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. GrossRecognizedLiabilities Gross AmountsOffset Net AmountsPresented Gross AmountsNot Offset Net Amount (In thousands) December 31, 2018 Repurchase Agreements Short-term $5,046 - 5,046 5,046 - $5,046 - 5,046 5,046 - December 31, 2017 Repurchase Agreements Short-term $11,285 - 11,285 11,285 - $11,285 - 11,285 11,285 - - 86 -15)Commitments, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, and Contingent Liabilities The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements ofcredit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of those instrumentsreflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments. December 31, 2018 2017 (In Thousands) Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent potential credit risk: Commitments to extend credit under first mortgage loans(1) $33,762 31,543 Commitments to extend credit under home equity lines of credit 14,903 14,972 Unused portion of construction loans 79,776 17,097 Unused portion of business lines of credit 16,778 16,878 Standby letters of credit 860 259 (1) Excludes commitments to originate loans held for sale, which are discussed in the following footnote.Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitmentsgenerally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expirewithout being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements of the Company. The Company evaluates eachcustomer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, isbased on management’s credit evaluation of the counter-party. Collateral obtained generally consists of mortgages on the underlying real estate. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit riskinvolved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Company holds mortgages on theunderlying real estate as collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary. The Company has determined that there are no probable losses related to commitments to extend credit or the standby letters of credit as of December 31, 2018and 2017.In the normal course of business, the Company, or it's subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, any liabilityresulting from pending proceedings would not be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.Herrington et al. v. Waterstone Mortgage CorporationWaterstone Mortgage Corporation is a defendant in a class action lawsuit that was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District ofWisconsin and subsequently compelled to arbitration before the American Arbitration Association. The plaintiff class alleged that Waterstone MortgageCorporation violated certain provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and failed to pay loan officers consistent with their employment agreements.On July 5, 2017, the arbitrator issued a Final Award finding Waterstone Mortgage Corporation liable for unpaid minimum wages, overtime, unreimbursedbusiness expenses, and liquidated damages under the FLSA. On December 8, 2017, the District Court confirmed the award in large part, and entered a judgmentagainst Waterstone in the amount of $7,267,919 in damages to Claimants, $3,298,851 in attorney fees and costs, and a $20,000 incentive fee to PlaintiffHerrington, plus post-judgment interest. On February 12, 2018, the District Court awarded post-arbitration fees and costs of approximately $98,000. Thejudgment was appealed by Waterstone to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, where oral argument was held on May 29, 2018. On October 22, 2018, theSeventh Circuit issued a ruling vacating the District Court's order enforcing the arbitration award. If the District Court determines the agreement only allows forindividual arbitration, the award would be vacated and the case sent to individual arbitration for a new proceeding. If the District Court determines thearbitration agreement nevertheless allows for collective arbitration, the District Court could confirm the prior award.On December 28, 2018, Plaintiff filed her post-remand brief. In it, Plaintiff asks the Court to reaffirm the arbitration award entered by Arbitrator Pratt in full.Alternatively, she asked the Court to affirm her individual damage award and the awards of 123 other opt-ins whose arbitration agreements permit joinder orclass actions. Lastly, Plaintiff asked the Court to have 154 opt-ins intervene and file an amended complaint for individual relief in court. Waterstone opposedthe motion on January 28, 2019, and asked the Court to vacate the prior Final Award in full because Herrington’s arbitration agreement only allows forindividual arbitration. Plaintiff filed its reply on February 14, 2019.If the judgment is upheld in full, the Company has estimated that the award, which includes attorney's fees, costs, and interest, could be as high as $11 million.However, Waterstone has meaningful appellate rights and intends to vigorously defend its interests in this matter, including arguing for complete reversal onappeal. Although the Company believes there is a strong basis to vacate the award, there remains a reasonable possibility that the Court's judgment will beaffirmed in whole or in part, with the possible range of loss from $0 to $11 million. We do not believe that the loss is probable at this time, as that term is used inassessing loss contingencies. Accordingly, in accordance with the authoritative guidance in the evaluation of contingencies, the Company has not recorded anaccrual related to this matter.- 87 -Werner et al. v. Waterstone Mortgage CorporationWaterstone Mortgage Corporation is a defendant in a putative collection action lawsuit that was filed on August 4, 2017 in the United States District Court forthe Western District of Wisconsin, Werner et al. v. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation. Plaintiffs allege that Waterstone Mortgage Corporation violated the FairLabor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay loan officers minimum and overtime wages. On October 26, 2017, Plaintiffs moved for conditional certification andto provide notice to the putative class. On February 9, 2018, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification and notice.On July 23, 2018, Waterstone filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the claims. It sought to (1) dismiss the time-barred claims of 4 opt-ins and (2)dismiss all other opt-ins due to the denial of conditional certification. In response, all but Werner and Wiesneski filed motions to withdraw their consents to jointhe case. The Court denied the summary judgment motion on the basis that it was moot due to the opt-in plaintiffs voluntarily dismissing their case.On October 17, 2018, Werner and Wiesneski asked the Court to send their claims to arbitration. On December 13, 2018, the Court denied the request, findingthey had waived their right to arbitrate based on litigating the case in Court for over a year. Thus, the case remained in Court as a two-Plaintiff case.As of February 2019, the parties have reached a settlement in principle to resolve the claims. The amount of the settlement would not have a material impact tothe financial statements. The parties are working on finalizing the terms of settlement.16)Derivative Financial Instruments In connection with its mortgage banking activities, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments as part of its strategy to manage its exposure tochanges in interest rates. Mortgage banking derivatives include interest rate lock commitments provided to customers to fund mortgage loans to be sold in thesecondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of such loans. It is the Company’s practice to enter into forward commitments for the futuredelivery of residential mortgage loans when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of future changes ininterest rates on its commitments to fund the loans as well as on its portfolio of mortgage loans held-for-sale. The Company’s mortgage banking derivativeshave not been designated as being a hedge relationship. These instruments are used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and otheridentified risks but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements of ASC 815. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedgingrelationships are recorded directly in earnings. The Company does not use derivatives for speculative purposes.Forward commitments to sell mortgage loans represent commitments obtained by the Company from a secondary market agency to purchase mortgages fromthe Company at specified interest rates and within specified periods of time. Commitments to sell loans are made to mitigate interest rate risk on interest ratelock commitments to originate loans and loans held for sale. At December 31, 2018, the Company had forward commitments to sell mortgage loans with anaggregate notional amount of $276.3 million and interest rate lock commitments with an aggregate notional amount of approximately $164.9 million. The fairvalue of the forward commitments to sell mortgage loans at December 31, 2018 included a loss of $1.1 million that is reported as a component of other liabilitieson the Company's consolidated statement of financial condition. The fair value of the interest rate locks at December 31, 2018 included a gain of $2.0 millionthat is reported as a component of other assets on the Company's consolidated statements of financial condition.In determining the fair value of its derivative loan commitments, the Company considers the value that would be generated when the loan arising from exerciseof the loan commitment is sold in the secondary mortgage market. That value includes the price that the loan is expected to be sold for in the secondarymortgage market. The fair value of these commitments is recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition with the changes in fair value recordedas a component of mortgage banking income.Residential mortgage loans sold to others are predominantly conventional residential first lien mortgages. The Company's agreements to sell residentialmortgage loans in the normal course of business usually require certain representations and warranties on the underlying loans sold related to creditinformation, loan documentation and collateral, which if subsequently are untrue or breached, could require the Company to repurchase certain loans affected.The Company has only been required to make insignificant repurchases as a result of breaches of representations and warranties. The Company's agreementsto sell residential mortgage loans also contain limited recourse provisions. The recourse provisions are limited in that the recourse provision ends after certainpayment criteria have been met. With respect to these loans, repurchase could be required if defined delinquency issues arose during the limited recourseperiod. Given that the underlying loans delivered to buyers are predominantly conventional first lien mortgages and that historical experience shows negligiblelosses and insignificant repurchase activity, management believes that losses and repurchases under the limited recourse provisions will continue to beinsignificant.- 88 -17)Fair Values Measurements ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures aboutfair value measurements. This accounting standard applies to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existingaccounting pronouncements. The standard also emphasizes that fair value (i.e., the price that would be received in an orderly transaction that is not a forcedliquidation or distressed sale at the measurement date), among other things, is based on exit price versus entry price, should include assumptions about risksuch as nonperformance risk in liability fair values, and is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. When considering the assumptionsthat market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, this accounting standard establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between marketparticipant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of thehierarchy).The fair value hierarchy prioritizes inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels.Level 1 inputs - In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the abilityto access.Level 2 inputs - Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs use inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 inputs that are observable for the asset orliability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similarassets or liabilities in markets where there are few transactions and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interestrates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.Level 3 inputs - Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset orliability.In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair valuehierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in itsentirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considersfactors specific to the asset or liability.The following table presents information about our assets recorded in our consolidated statement of financial position at their fair value on a recurring basis asof December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such fair value. Fair Value Measurements Using December 31,2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 (In Thousands) Available for sale securities Mortgage-backed securities $41,631 - 41,631 - Collateralized mortgage obligations Government sponsored enterprise issued 74,955 - 74,955 - Municipal securities 55,948 - 55,948 - Other debt securities 13,186 - 13,186 - Loans held for sale 141,616 - 141,616 - Mortgage banking derivative assets 2,014 - - 2,014 Mortgage banking derivative liabilities 1,116 - - 1,116 Fair Value Measurements Using December 31,2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 (In Thousands) Available for sale securities Mortgage-backed securities $57,435 - 57,435 - Collateralized mortgage obligations Government sponsored enterprise issued 60,500 - 60,500 - Government sponsored enterprise bonds 2,497 - 2,497 - Municipal securities 63,769 - 63,769 - Other debt securities 14,525 - 14,525 - Certificates of deposit 981 - 981 - Loans held for sale 149,896 - 149,896 - Mortgage banking derivative assets 2,004 - - 2,004 Mortgage banking derivative liabilities - - - - - 89 -The following summarizes the valuation techniques for assets recorded in our consolidated statements of financial condition at their fair value on a recurringbasis:Available for sale securities – The Company's investment securities classified as available for sale include: mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgageobligations, government sponsored enterprise bonds, municipal securities and other debt securities. The fair value of mortgage-backed securities, collateralizedmortgage obligations and government sponsored enterprise bonds are determined by a third party valuation source using observable market data utilizing amatrix or multi-dimensional relational pricing model. Standard inputs to these models include observable market data such as benchmark yields, reported trades,broker quotes, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, prepayment models and bid/offer market data. For securities with an early redemption feature, an optionadjusted spread model is utilized to adjust the issuer spread. These model and matrix measurements are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fairvalue of municipal and other debt securities is determined by a third party valuation source using observable market data utilizing a multi-dimensional relationalpricing model. Standard inputs to this model include observable market data such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker quotes, rating updates andissuer spreads. These model measurements are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The change in fair value is recorded through an adjustment tothe statement of comprehensive income.Loans held for sale – The Company carries loans held for sale at fair value under the fair value option model. Fair value is generally determined by estimating agross premium or discount, which is derived from pricing currently observable in the secondary market, principally from observable prices for forward salecommitments. Loans held-for-sale are considered to be Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy of valuation techniques. The change in fair value is recorded throughan adjustment to the statement of income.Mortgage banking derivatives - Mortgage banking derivatives include interest rate lock commitments to originate residential loans held for sale to individualcustomers and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to various investors. The Company utilizes a valuation model to estimate the fair value ofits interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale, which includes applying a pull through rate based upon historicalexperience and the current interest rate environment and then multiplying by quoted investor prices. The Company also utilizes a valuation model to estimatethe fair value of its forward commitments to sell residential loans, which includes matching specific terms and maturities of the forward commitments againstapplicable investor pricing available. While there are Level 2 and 3 inputs used in the valuation models, the Company has determined that one or more of theinputs significant in the valuation of both of the mortgage banking derivatives fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The change in fair value is recordedthrough an adjustment to the statement of income.The table below presents reconciliation for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during 2018 and2017. Mortgagebankingderivatives, net Balance at December 31, 2016 $3,334 Transfer into level 3 - Mortgage derivative gain, net (1,330)Balance at December 31, 2017 2,004 Transfer into level 3 - Mortgage derivative loss, net (1,106)Balance at December 31, 2018 $898 - 90 -Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Non-recurring BasisThe following table presents information about our assets recorded in our consolidated statement of financial position at their fair value on a non-recurringbasis as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such fair value. Fair Value Measurements Using December 31,2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 (In Thousands) Impaired loans, net (1) $2,876 - - 2,876 Real estate owned 2,152 - - 2,152 Fair Value Measurements Using December 31,2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 (In Thousands) Impaired loans, net (1) $861 - - 861 Real estate owned 4,558 - - 4,558 _________(1) Represents collateral-dependent impaired loans, net, which are included in loans.Loans – We do not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. On a non-recurring basis, loans determined to be impaired are analyzed to determine whethera collateral shortfall exists, and if such a shortfall exists, are recorded on our consolidated statements of financial condition at net realizable value of theunderlying collateral. Fair value is determined based on third party appraisals. Appraised values are adjusted to consider disposition costs and also to takeinto consideration the age of the most recent appraisal. Given the significance of the adjustments made to appraised values necessary to estimate the fair valueof impaired loans, loans that have been deemed to be impaired are considered to be Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy of valuation techniques. At December 31,2018, loans determined to be impaired with an outstanding balance of $3.1 million were carried net of specific reserves of $186,000 for a fair value of$2,876,000. At December 31, 2017, loans determined to be impaired with an outstanding balance of $1.0 million were carried net of specific reserves of $155,000for a fair value of $861,000. Impaired loans collateralized by assets which are valued in excess of the net investment in the loan do not require any specificreserves.Real estate owned – On a non-recurring basis, real estate owned, is recorded in our consolidated statements of financial condition at the lower of cost or fairvalue. Fair value is determined based on third party appraisals and, if less than the carrying value of the foreclosed loan, the carrying value of the real estateowned is adjusted to the fair value. Appraised values are adjusted to consider disposition costs and also to take into consideration the age of the most recentappraisal. Given the significance of the adjustments made to appraised values necessary to estimate the fair value of the properties, real estate owned isconsidered to be Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy of valuation techniques. Changes in the fair value of real estate owned totaled $309,000 and $514,000 duringthe year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively and are recorded in real estate owned expense. At December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, realestate owned totaled $2.2 million and $4.6 million, respectively. Mortgage servicing rights - The Company utilizes an independent valuation from a third party which uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fairvalue of mortgage servicing rights. The model utilizes prepayment assumptions to project cash flows related to the mortgage servicing rights based upon thecurrent interest rate environment, which is then discounted to estimate an expected fair value of the mortgage servicing rights. The model considerscharacteristics specific to the underlying mortgage portfolio, such as: contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, latecharges and costs to service. Given the significance of the unobservable inputs utilized in the estimation process, mortgage servicing rights are classified asLevel 3 within the fair value hierarchy. The Company records the mortgage servicing rights at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. For the purpose ofmeasuring impairment, mortgage servicing rights are stratified based upon predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans. At December 31, 2018 andDecember 31, 2017, there was no impairment identified for mortgage servicing rights.A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant tothe valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. Fair value information about financial instruments follows, whether or not recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition, for which it ispracticable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or othervaluation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Inthat regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized inimmediate settlement of the instrument. Certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments are excluded from its disclosure requirements.Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.- 91 -The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments consist of the following at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017: December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Carryingamount Fair Value Carryingamount Fair Value Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 (In Thousands) Financial Assets Cash and cash equivalents $86,101 86,101 73,601 12,500 - 48,607 48,607 39,607 9,000 - Securities available-for-sale 185,720 185,720 - 185,720 - 199,707 199,707 - 199,707 - Loans held for sale 141,616 141,616 - 141,616 - 149,896 149,896 - 149,896 - Loans receivable 1,379,148 1,311,633 - - 1,311,633 1,291,814 1,291,142 - - 1,291,142 FHLB stock 19,350 19,350 - 19,350 - 16,875 16,875 - 16,875 - Accrued interest receivable 5,337 5,337 5,337 - - 4,924 4,924 4,924 - - Mortgage servicing rights 109 109 - - 109 888 1,125 - - 1,125 Mortgage banking derivativeassets 2,014 2,014 - - 2,014 2,004 2,004 - - 2,004 Financial Liabilities Deposits 1,038,495 1,038,544 302,622 735,922 - 967,380 967,558 278,401 689,157 - Advance payments byborrowers for taxes 4,371 4,371 4,371 - - 4,876 4,876 4,876 - - Borrowings 435,046 432,269 - 432,269 - 386,285 384,348 - 384,348 - Accrued interest payable 1,395 1,395 1,395 - - 886 886 886 - - Mortgage banking derivativeliabilities 1,116 1,116 - - 1,116 - - - - - The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in determining its fair value disclosures for financial instruments.Cash and Cash Equivalents The carrying amount reported in the consolidated statements of financial condition for cash and cash equivalents is a reasonable estimate of fair value for theseshort-term instruments.Securities The fair value of securities is determined by a third party valuation source using observable market data utilizing a matrix or multi-dimensional relational pricingmodel. Standard inputs to these models include observable market data such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker quotes, issuer spreads, benchmarksecurities and bid/offer market data. For securities with an early redemption feature, an option adjusted spread model is utilized to adjust the issuerspread. Prepayment models are used for mortgage related securities with prepayment features.Loans Held for Sale Fair value is estimated using the prices of the Company’s existing commitments to sell such loans and/or the quoted market price for commitments to sell similarloans. Loans Receivable The fair value estimation process for the loan portfolio uses an exit price concept and reflects discounts the Company believes are consistent with discounts inthe market place. Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as one- to four-family, multi-family, home equity, construction and land, commercial real estate, commercial, and other consumer. The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting thefuture cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for similar maturities. The fair valueanalysis also includes other assumptions to estimate fair value, intended to approximate those a market participant would use in an orderly transaction, withadjustments for discount rates, interest rates, liquidity, and credit spreads, as appropriate. FHLB Stock For FHLB stock, the carrying amount is the amount at which shares can be redeemed with the FHLB and is a reasonable estimate of fair value. - 92 -Deposits and Advance Payments by Borrowers for Taxes The fair values for interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing negotiable order of withdrawal accounts, savings accounts, and money market accounts are, bydefinition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit areestimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates of similar remaining maturities to a scheduleof aggregated expected monthly maturities of the outstanding certificates of deposit. The advance payments by borrowers for taxes are equal to their carryingamounts at the reporting date. Borrowings Fair values for borrowings are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current interest rates to estimated future cash flows of theborrowings.Accrued Interest Payable and Accrued Interest Receivable For accrued interest payable and accrued interest receivable, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of CreditCommitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are generally not marketable. Furthermore, interest rates on any amounts drawn under suchcommitments would be generally established at market rates at the time of the draw. Fair values for the Company's commitments to extend credit and standbyletters of credit are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements, thecounterparty's credit standing, and discounted cash flow analyses. The fair value of the Company's commitments to extend credit was not material at December31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Mortgage Banking Derivative Assets and LiabilitiesMortgage banking derivatives include interest rate lock commitments to originate residential loans held for sale to individual customers and forwardcommitments to sell residential mortgage loans to various investors. The Company relies on a valuation model to estimate the fair value of its interest rate lockcommitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale, which includes applying a pull through rate based upon historical experience and the currentinterest rate environment, and then multiplying by quoted investor prices. The Company also relies on a valuation model to estimate the fair value of its forwardcommitments to sell residential loans, which includes matching specific terms and maturities of the forward commitments against applicable investor pricingavailable. On the Company's Consolidated Statements of Condition, instruments that have a positive fair value are included in prepaid expenses and otherassets, and those instruments that have a negative fair value are included in other liabilities. 18)Earnings Per Share Earnings per share are computed using the two-class method. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income allocated to common shares by theweighted average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by theweighted average number of common shares outstanding adjusted for the dilutive effect of all potential common shares.Presented below are the calculations for basic and diluted earnings per share: For the year ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (In Thousands, except per share amounts) Net income $30,754 25,964 25,532 Net income available to unvested restricted stockholders - - 15 Net income available to common stockholders $30,754 25,964 25,517 Weighted average shares outstanding 27,363 27,467 27,037 Effect of dilutive potential common shares 271 432 337 Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 27,634 27,899 27,374 Basic income per share $1.12 0.95 0.94 Diluted income per share $1.11 0.93 0.93 - 93 -19)Condensed Parent Company Only Statements Statements of Financial Condition December 31, 2018 2017 (In Thousands) Assets Cash and cash equivalents $20,116 28,954 Investment in subsidiaries 380,897 386,838 Other assets 2,476 207 Total Assets $403,489 415,999 Liabilities and shareholders' equity Liabilities: Other liabilities $3,810 3,895 Shareholders' equity Preferred Stock (par value $.01 per share), Authorized - 50,000,000 shares in 2018 and 2017, no shares issued - - Common stock (par value $.01 per share), Authorized - 100,000,000 shares in 2018 and in 2017, Issued - 28,463,239 in 2018and 29,501,346 in 2017, Outstanding - 28,463,239 in 2018 and 29,501,346 in 2017 285 295 Additional paid-in-capital 330,327 326,655 Retained earnings 187,153 183,358 Unearned ESOP shares (17,804) (18,991)Cost of shares repurchased (7,171,537 in 2018 and 6,030,900 in 2017), at cost (97,921) (78,736)Accumulated other comprehensive loss (net of taxes) (2,361) (477)Total shareholders' equity 399,679 412,104 Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $403,489 415,999 - 94 -Statements of Operations For the year ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (In Thousands) Interest income $656 675 716 Equity in income of subsidiaries (distributed and undistributed) 30,722 25,937 26,309 Total income 31,378 26,612 27,025 Compensation - - - Professional fees 37 57 34 Other expense 577 575 553 Total expense 614 632 587 Income before income tax expense 30,764 25,980 26,438 Income tax expense 10 16 906 Net income $30,754 25,964 25,532 - 95 -Statements of Cash Flows For the year ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 (In Thousands) Cash flows from operating activities Net income $30,754 25,964 25,532 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: Amortization of unearned ESOP 1,796 1,956 1,633 Stock based compensation 1,760 1,902 1,913 Deferred income taxes - (58) 854 Equity in earnings of subsidiaries (30,722) (25,937) (26,309)Change in other assets and liabilities (4,019) 530 (2,031)Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (431) 4,357 1,592 Net cash used in investing activities - - - Dividends received from subsidiary 36,535 14,698 12,783 Cash dividends on common stock (27,050) (26,952) (6,917)Proceeds from stock option exercises 1,304 1,052 3,556 Purchase of common stock returned to authorized but unissued (19,196) (2,190) (3,858)Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (8,407) (13,392) 5,564 Net (decrease) increase in cash (8,838) (9,035) 7,156 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 28,954 37,989 30,833 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $20,116 28,954 37,989 - 96 -20)Segment Reporting Selected financial and descriptive information is required to be provided about reportable operating segments, considering a "management approach" concept asthe basis for identifying reportable segments. The management approach is based on the way that management organizes the segments within the enterprise formaking operating decisions, allocating resources, and assessing performance. Consequently, the segments are evident from the structure of the enterprise'sinternal organization, focusing on financial information that an enterprise's chief operating decision-makers use to make decisions about the enterprise's operatingmatters.The Company has determined that it has two reportable segments: community banking and mortgage banking. The Company's operating segments are presentedbased on its management structure and management accounting practices. The structure and practices are specific to the Company and therefore, the financialresults of the Company's business segments are not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial institutions.Community BankingThe Community Banking segment provides consumer and business banking products and services to customers primarily within Southeastern Wisconsin alongwith a loan production office in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Within this segment, the following products and services are provided: (1) lending solutions such asresidential mortgages, home equity loans and lines of credit, personal and installment loans, real estate financing, business loans, and business lines of credit; (2)deposit and transactional solutions such as checking, credit, debit and pre-paid cards, online banking and bill pay, and money transfer services; (3) investablefunds solutions such as savings, money market deposit accounts, IRA accounts, certificates of deposit, and (4) fixed and variable annuities, insurance as well astrust and investment management accounts.Consumer products include loan and deposit products: mortgage, home equity loans and lines, personal term loans, demand deposit accounts, interest bearingtransaction accounts and time deposits. Consumer products also include personal investment services. Business banking products include secured andunsecured lines and term loans for working capital, inventory and general corporate use, commercial real estate construction loans, demand deposit accounts,interest bearing transaction accounts and time deposits.Mortgage BankingThe Mortgage Banking segment provides residential mortgage loans for the primary purpose of sale in the secondary market. Mortgage banking products andservices are provided by offices in 23 states with the ability to lend in 47 states. As of or for the Year ended December 31, 2018 CommunityBanking MortgageBanking HoldingCompany andOther Consolidated (in thousands) Net interest income (loss) $54,946 (850) 81 54,177 Provision (credit) for loan losses (1,150) 90 - (1,060)Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses 56,096 (940) 81 55,237 Noninterest income 4,299 115,429 (1,529) 118,199 Noninterest expenses: Compensation, payroll taxes, and other employee benefits 18,385 79,982 (583) 97,784 Occupancy, office furniture, and equipment 3,307 7,548 - 10,855 Advertising 749 3,374 - 4,123 Data processing 1,671 1,105 16 2,792 Communications 425 1,186 - 1,611 Professional fees 967 1,343 17 2,327 Real estate owned 1 - - 1 Loan processing expense - 3,372 - 3,372 Other 2,715 8,522 (946) 10,291 Total noninterest expenses 28,220 106,432 (1,496) 133,156 Income before income taxes 32,175 8,057 48 40,280 Income taxes 7,273 2,243 10 9,526 Net income $24,902 5,814 38 30,754 Total Assets $1,913,647 166,926 (165,192) 1,915,381 - 97 - As of or for the Year ended December 31, 2017 CommunityBanking MortgageBanking HoldingCompany andOther Consolidated (in thousands) Net interest income $50,608 (49) 174 50,733 Provision (credit) for loan losses (1,300) 134 - (1,166)Net interest income after provision for loan losses 51,908 (183) 174 51,899 Noninterest income 3,942 122,091 (1,620) 124,413 Noninterest expenses: Compensation, payroll taxes, and other employee benefits 17,495 80,077 (488) 97,084 Occupancy, office furniture and equipment 3,127 7,051 - 10,178 Advertising 627 2,706 - 3,333 Data processing 1,619 805 15 2,439 Communications 408 1,152 - 1,560 Professional fees 782 1,837 37 2,656 Real estate owned 379 - - 379 Loan processing expense - 3,062 - 3,062 Other 2,828 9,400 (1,040) 11,188 Total noninterest expenses 27,265 106,090 (1,476) 131,879 Income before income taxes 28,585 15,818 30 44,433 Income taxes 12,228 6,225 16 18,469 Net income $16,357 9,593 14 25,964 Total Assets $1,834,191 173,237 (201,027) 1,806,401 As of or for the Year ended December 31, 2016 CommunityBanking MortgageBanking HoldingCompany andOther Consolidated (in thousands) Net interest income $42,940 216 288 43,444 Provision for loan losses 200 180 - 380 Net interest income after provision for loan losses 42,740 36 288 43,064 Noninterest income 4,619 122,842 (1,096) 126,365 Noninterest expenses: Compensation, payroll taxes, and other employee benefits 17,192 78,288 (424) 95,056 Occupancy, office furniture and equipment 3,165 6,182 - 9,347 Advertising 581 2,162 - 2,743 Data processing 1,630 872 18 2,520 Communications 406 1,056 - 1,462 Professional fees 756 1,432 (53) 2,135 Real estate owned 399 - - 399 Loan processing expense - 2,875 - 2,875 Other 2,221 9,152 (475) 10,898 Total noninterest expenses 26,350 102,019 (934) 127,435 Income before income taxes 21,009 20,859 126 41,994 Income taxes 7,006 8,550 906 16,462 Net income (loss) $14,003 12,309 (780) 25,532 Total Assets $1,794,697 252,864 (256,942) 1,790,619 - 98 -21) Business CombinationAcademy Mortgage Corporation BranchOn June 29, 2018, Waterstone Mortgage Corporation, a subsidiary of WaterStone Bank SSB, completed an acquisition of a branch of Academy Mortgage Corporation,a mortgage banking company in New Mexico. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation paid Academy approximately $600,000 in cash for the transaction.Waterstone Mortgage Corporation's acquisition of the branch was accounted for as a business combination. Under the transaction, fixed assets and a customer listwere acquired and the branch leases were assumed. Under this method of accounting, assets acquired are recorded at their estimated fair values. Total considerationpaid less the fair value of assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The Company recorded an insignificant amount of goodwill as a result of this acquisition. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureNoneItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresDisclosure Controls and Procedures: Waterstone Financial, Inc. management, with the participation of Waterstone Financial, Inc.'s Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of Waterstone Financial, Inc.'s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation,Waterstone Financial, Inc.'s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, Waterstone Financial, Inc.'sdisclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed byWaterstone Financial, Inc. in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: There have not been any changes in Waterstone Financial, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting (assuch term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the final fiscal quarter of the period to which this report relates that havematerially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Waterstone Financial, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting.- 99 -Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial ReportingManagement of Waterstone Financial Inc. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. TheCompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financialreporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).As of December 31, 2018, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on criteria for effective internalcontrol over financial reporting established in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the TreadwayCommission (COSO) in 2013. Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2018 is effective.RSM US LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K, has issued a report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. The report, which expresses anunqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, is included below under the heading“Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMTo the Board of Directors and ShareholdersWaterstone Financial, Inc. Opinion on the Internal Control Over Financial ReportingWe have audited Waterstone Financial Inc. and subsidiaries' (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteriaestablished in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. In our opinion,the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in InternalControl — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financialstatements of the Company and our report dated March 6, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion.Basis for OpinionThe Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required tobe independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and ExchangeCommission and the PCAOB.We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assuranceabout whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internalcontrol over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internalcontrol based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that ouraudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial ReportingA company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded asnecessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of thecompany are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regardingprevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation ofeffectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance withthe policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ RSM US LLP Milwaukee, Wisconsin March 6, 2019 - 100 -Item 9B. Other Information.NonePart IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceThe information in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, prepared for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which contains information concerningdirectors of the Company under the caption “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors” and compliance with Section 16 reporting requirements under the caption “Section16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” continued below and information concerning corporate governance under the caption “Other Board and CorporateGovernance Matters” and "Board Meetings and Committees" in Part I hereof is incorporated herein by reference.Executive Officers of the RegistrantThe table below sets forth certain information regarding the persons who have been determined, by our board of directors, to be executive officers of theCompany. The executive officers of the Company are elected annually and hold office until their respective successors have been elected or until death, resignation,retirement or removal by the Board of directors. Name and Age Offices and Positions with Waterstone Financial and Subsidiaries* ExecutiveOfficerSinceDouglas S. Gordon, 61 Chief Executive Officer and President of Waterstone Financial and of WaterStone Bank 2005William F. Bruss, 49 General Counsel, Executive Vice President and Secretary of Waterstone Financial and of WaterStone Bank 2005Mark R. Gerke, 44 Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Waterstone Financial and of WaterStone Bank 2016A.W. Pickel, III, 63 Chief Executive Officer and President of Waterstone Mortgage Corporation 2018Julie A Glynn, 55 Senior Vice President and Director of Retail Banking of WaterStone Bank 2018 *Excluding directorships and excluding positions with Bank subsidiary that do not constitute a substantial part of the officers’ duties.Item 11. Executive CompensationThe information in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, prepared for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which contains information concerningthis item under the captions “Executive Compensation,” “Director Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “CompensationDiscussion and Analysis,” and “Compensation Committee Report” is incorporated herein by reference.Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersThe information in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, prepared for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which contains information concerningthis item under the caption “Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock” is incorporated herein by reference.Compensation PlansSet forth below is information as of December 31, 2018 regarding equity compensation plans that have been approved by shareholders. The Company has noequity based benefit plans, other than its employee stock ownership plan, that were not approved by shareholders.Plan Number ofshares to beissued uponexercise ofoutstandingoptions andrights Weightedaverage optionexercise price Number ofsecuritiesremainingavailable forissuance underplan 2006 Equity Incentive Plan 1,366,301(1) $4.20 273,392 2015 Equity Incentive Plan 1,759,000(2) $13.27 1,783,000 __________(1)Consists of 1,000,140 shares reserved for grants of stock options and 366,161 shares reserved for grants of restricted stock. On December 31, 2018, 7,237options were outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $4.20 of which 7,237 were exercisable as of that date.(2)Consists of 1,213,000 shares reserved for grants of stock options and 546,000 shares reserved for grants of restricted stock. On December 31, 2018, 1,053,832options were outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $13.27 of which 413,831 were exercisable as of that date.- 101 -Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director IndependenceThe information in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, prepared for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which contains information concerningthis item under the captions “Transactions with Certain Related Parties” and “Board Meetings and Committees” is incorporated herein by reference.Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesThe information in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, prepared for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which contains information concerningthis item under the caption “Proposal 2 - Ratification of the Appointment of Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” is incorporated herein by reference.Part IVItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules(a)Documents filed as part of the Report:1. and 2. Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules.The following consolidated financial statements of Waterstone Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries are filed as part of this report under Item 8, “FinancialStatements and Supplementary Data”:Report of RSM US LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, on consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition – December 31, 2018 and 2017.Consolidated Statements of Operations – Years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity – Years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under therelated instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted.(b). Exhibits. See Exhibit Index following the signature page of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference. Each management contract orcompensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report is identified in the Exhibit Index by an asterisk following its exhibit number. - 102 -Item 16. Form 10-K SummaryNot applicable.SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf bythe undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. WATERSTONE FINANCIAL, INC.March 6, 2019 By:/s/ Douglas S. Gordon Douglas S. Gordon Chief Executive OfficerPOWER OF ATTORNEYEach person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes Douglas S. Gordon or Mark R. Gerke, or any of them, as attorneys-in-fact with full power ofsubstitution, to execute in the name and on behalf of such person, individually, and in each capacity stated below or otherwise, and to file, any and all amendments tothis report.Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and inthe capacities indicated.*Signature and Title/s/ Douglas S. Gordon /s/ Patrick S. LawtonDouglas S. Gordon, Patrick S. Lawton, Chairman and DirectorChief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Mark R. Gerke /s/ Ellen S. BartelMark R. Gerke Ellen S. Bartel, DirectorChief Financial Officer /s/ Thomas E. Dalum Thomas E Dalum, Director /s/ Michael L. Hansen Michael L. Hansen, Director /s/ Kristine A. Rappé Kristine A. Rappé, Director /s/ Stephen J. Schmidt Stephen J. Schmidt, Director*Each of the above signatures is affixed as of March 6, 2019.- 103 -WATERSTONE FINANCIAL, INC(“Waterstone Financial” or the “Company”)Commission File No. 000-51507EXHIBIT INDEXTO2018 REPORT ON FORM 10-KThe following exhibits are filed with, or incorporated by reference in, this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018: ExhibitDescriptionIncorporated HereinBy Reference ToFiledHerewith 3.1Articles of Incorporation of the Company (2) 3.2Bylaws of the Company (2) 10.1Wauwatosa Holdings, Inc 2006 Equity Incentive Plan †(1) 10.2Employment Agreement By and Between Waterstone Mortgage Corporation and Eric J. Egenhoefer †(2) 10.3Bonus Description for Eric J. Egenhoefer, President of Waterstone Mortgage Corporation †(2) 10.4Waterstone Financial, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan †(3) 10.5Employment Agreement By and Between WaterStone Bank SSB and Douglas S. Gordon †(4) 10.6Change in Control Agreement Between WaterStone Bank SSB and Julie Glynn † X 10.7Resignation and Release Agreement Between Waterstone Mortgage Corporation and Eric J. Egenhoefer†(5) 10.8Employment Agreement By and Between Waterstone Mortgage Corporation and A.W. Pickel III †(6) 11.1Statement re: Computation of Per Share EarningsSee Note 18 in Part II Item 8 21.1List of Subsidiaries X 23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm X 24.1Powers of AttorneySignature Page 31.1Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 Certification signed by the Chief Executive Officer of WaterstoneFinancial X 31.2Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 Certification signed by the Chief Financial Officer of Waterstone Financial X 32.1Certification pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Chief Executive Officer of Waterstone Financial X 32.2Certification pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Chief Financial Officer of Waterstone Financial X† Management compensation contract or agreement(1) Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders filed by Wauwatosa Holdings, Inc (thepredecessor corporation to Waterstone Financial, Inc., a federal corporation) (Commission file no. 000-51507), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissionon March 27, 2006.(2) Incorporated by reference to the registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-189160), initially filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissionon June 7, 2013.(3) Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the proxy statement for the Special Meeting of Shareholders filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onJanuary 23, 2015 (File No. 001-36271).(4) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on October 24, 2014 (File No. 001-36271).(5) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on July 27, 2018 (File No. 001-36271).(6) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on October 2, 2018 (File No. 001-36271).- 104 -[This page has been intentionally left blank.] [This page has been intentionally left blank.] 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above