Quarterlytics / Industrials / Industrial - Machinery / Watts Water

Watts Water

wts · NYSE Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker wts
Exchange NYSE
Sector Industrials
Industry Industrial - Machinery
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2008 Annual Report · Watts Water
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Annual Report 2008

Annual Report 0915 

© Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 2009 

www.wattswater.com 

65550

Innovative Water Solutions

2008Backflow Preventer

Custom Fabrication  
at Mueller Steam Specialty

Powers Shower System

Water Infrastructure Projects in China

Robotic Welding at Ames

Watts Pressure Reducing Valve

CNC Milling Center at Webster Valve 

Pipe Cutting at Blücher

Corporate  
Information

Executive Offices
815 Chestnut Street
North Andover, MA 01845-6098
Tel. (978)688-1811
Fax: (978)688-2976

Registrar and Transfer Agent
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
161 N. Concord Exchange
South St. Paul, MN 55075
(800)468-9716

Counsel
WilmerHale
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109

Auditors
KPMG LLP
99 High Street
Boston, MA 02110

Stock Listing
New York Stock Exchange
Ticker Symbol: WTS

Executive Officers

Directors

Robert L. Ayers
Director

Kennett F. Burnes
Director

Richard J. Cathcart
Director

Timothy P. Horne
Director

Ralph E. Jackson, Jr.
Director

Kenneth J. McAvoy
Director

John K. McGillicuddy
Director

Gordon W. Moran
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board 
and Director

Daniel J. Murphy, III
Director

Patrick S. O’Keefe
Chief Executive Officer,  
President and Director

Patrick S. O’Keefe
Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director

William C. McCartney 
Chief Financial Officer 
and Treasurer

David J. Coghlan
President of North America  
and Asia

J. Dennis Cawte
Group Managing Director,  
Europe

Ernest E. Elliot
Executive Vice President of Marketing

Michael P. Flanders
Executive Vice President of  
Manufacturing Operations,  
North America and Asia

Josh C. Fu
President, Asia

Kenneth R. Lepage
General Counsel and Secretary

Gregory J. Michaud
Executive Vice President  
of Human Resources

Taylor K. Robinson
Executive Vice President of  
Supply Chain Management

This Annual Report contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private 
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements that relate to prospective events or 
developments are forward-looking statements. Also, words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” 
“expect,” “will” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. We cannot assure in-
vestors that our assumptions and expectations will prove to have been correct. There are a number 
of important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated 
or implied by forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, those 
set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 
ended December 31, 2008 included in this Annual Report. We undertake no intention or obliga-
tion to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, 
future events or otherwise.

For addition information on Watts Water Technologies, Inc., visit our web site at www.wattswater.com

A Legacy of  O
ne hundred and thirty five years ago, the 
then-named  Watts  Regulator  Company 
developed  steam  pressure  relief  valves  for 
the emerging textile indus-
try in the Merrimack Valley 
area of New England. Today, 
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 
provides  a  broad  range  of  prod-
ucts  to  the  global  water  market.    
Throughout  our  company’s  history, 
we have developed innovative products 
to meet our customers’ needs. Our principal 
product lines consist of:

•  Water  quality  products,  including  back-
flow  preventers  and  check  valves  for  pre-
venting reverse flow within water lines and 
fire  protection  systems,  point-of-use  water 
filtration  and  reverse  osmosis  systems  for 
both  commercial  and  residential  applica-
tions, and instrumentation reagents for wa-
ter analysis.

•  Water  safety  and  flow  control  products, 
including water pressure regulators for both 
commercial and residential applications, wa-
ter supply products for commercial and resi-
dential  applications,  temperature  and  pres-
sure relief valves for water heaters, boilers and 
associated systems, and thermostatic mixing 
valves  for  tempering  water  in  commercial 
and residential applications.
• Drainage and conveyance products for in-
dustrial, commercial, infrastructure, marine 
and residential applications.
•  Water-based  HVAC  systems  and  com-
ponents, including systems for under-floor 
radiant heating and hydraulic pump groups 
for gas boiler manufacturers, and renewable 
energy  applications,  including  solar  and 
heat pump control packages.
•  Flexible  stainless  steel  connectors  and 
subassemblies  for  natural  and  liquid  pro-
pane  gas  in  commercial  food  service  and 
residential applications.

A Legacy of  InnovationRainwater Harvesting Systems

Fully Integrated Solar Control Package

Radiant Floor Warming

One  of  the  21st  century’s  greatest  chal-
lenges is the preservation of the earth’s nat-
ural    resources in the face of a skyrocketing 
world population and the depletion of water 
and conventional energy sources. Consistent 
with our history, Watts Water Technologies 
strives  to  provide  innovative  products  and 
systems that deliver clean and safe water in a 
controlled and resource-conscious manner.
Our  membership  in  the  United  States 
Green  Building  Council  demonstrates  our 
commitment to offering an extensive prod-
uct line for the sustainable building industry 
that reduces water and energy consumption 
and lowers operating costs. Our products are 
specified  and  installed  in  sustainable  build-
ing  projects  and  are  used  in  renewable  en-
ergy systems, such as solar and geothermal.     

Our  recently  introduced  rainwater  har-
vesting  systems  preserve  valuable  ground-
water supplies, reduce water treatment and 

transport expenses, and counter rising wa-
ter and wastewater costs. 

In Europe, we continue to develop our line 
of alternative energy solutions, including our 
extensive line of safety and control packages 
for solar thermal systems, solid fuel boilers 
(pellets, split logs, wood chips), and geother-
mal heat pumps that promote both energy 
efficiency and environmental protection.

While Europeans have used radiant heating 
for  decades,  Watts  Water Technologies  has 
pioneered  its  development  and  widespread 
use in North America as a more efficient and 
comfortable means of heating homes and in-
stitutional and commercial buildings.
Warming  floors  with  renewable  energy 
and radiant energy is an ideal way to heat a 
space.  Objects are warmed directly without 
overheating the air. Lower air temperatures 
mean less heat loss through windows and air 

SafetyConservationCommercial Reverse Osmosis System

Large Diameter Butterfly Valves

infiltration. Zone by zone control dramati-
cally lowers fuel consumption. In addition, 
our  water-based  radiant  systems  can  use 
solar,  biomass,  geothermal,  and  waste  heat 
recovery to heat rooms.     

The need for pure water, both for drinking 
and  for  industrial  and  manufacturing  uses,  
grows  every  year  while  the  sources  of  clean 
surface water are diminishing. Our commer-
cial grade, large volume reverse osmosis (RO) 
water  purification  systems  and  consumer-
oriented zero waste RO systems are helping 
to clean and conserve water every day. 

We  are  also  providing  environmentally 
friendly alternatives to help building own-
ers,  property  managers  and  facility  engi-

neers fight the battle against water scale and 
its destructive by-products. Our OneFlow® 
Anti-Scale Systems prevent scale formation 
by transforming dissolved hardness miner-
als into harmless, inactive microscopic par-
ticles. They also reduce energy consumption 
by  keeping  heat  transfer  surfaces  free  of 
energy-robbing scale formation and do not 
require chemicals or ongoing consumables 
(such  as  salt)  that  can  harm  wastewater 
treatment processes.

At Watts Water Technologies,  our  con-
tinual  focus  on  developing  products  to 
meet  our  customers’  needs  derives  from 
our  five  operational  pillars  –  comfort, 
safety,  quality,  conservation  and  control.     
These  pillars  drive  our  product  develop-
ment  and  acquisitions  and  direct  our 
search  for  innovative  products  to  satisfy 
customers’ needs in the various markets of 
the world we serve. 

ComfortQualityControlTotal Net Sales

1,459.4

1,382.3

1,230.8

s
n
o

i
l
l
i

M

$1500

$1200

$900

$600

$300

$0

Free Cash Flow

120.9

$125

$100

s
n
o

i
l
l
i

M

$75

70.2

54.5

$50

$25

For further discussion of “free cash flow,” a non-GAAP 
financial measure, and the comparable GAAP measure, 
see the section entitled “Management’s Discussion 
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of 
Operations” in our Form 10-K included in this Annual 
Report to Shareholders.

2006 

2007 

2008

2006 

2007 

2008

North America Net Sales

Europe Net Sales

China Net Sales

$900

871.0

866.2

821.3

$600

546.0

452.6

$60

58.7

47.2

$45

42.0

s
n
o

i
l
l
i

M

$700

$500

$300

$400

367.5

s
n
o

i
l
l
i

M

$200

$0

s
n
o

i
l
l
i

M

$30

$15

$0

2006 

2007 

2008

2006 

2007 

2008

2006 

2007 

2008

Financial Highlights 
 
 
 
 
2008
                was a year in which we were able to 
expand and strengthen our worldwide business de-
spite significant volatility in both our end markets 
and in the global financial markets.

The  United  States  residential 
construction  market  declined 
over 30% for the second year in a 
row, commercial construction in 
the  United  States  softened  and 
started  to  decline  toward  year 
end,  and  European  construc-
tion levels declined across most 
markets.

Patrick S. O’Keefe
Chief Executive Officer

Despite this difficult environ-
ment,  we  were  able  to  increase 
revenue due primarily to our ac-
quisition of Blücher Metals A/S 
in June 2008 and increased sales 
of products offered to the European alternative en-
ergy markets.

Consolidated revenues grew by $77.1 million, or 
5.6%, with the net increase attributable to the fol-
lowing factors:

(in millions)  % change
$ 
Organic 
$ 
Acquisitions 
$ 
Foreign Exchange 
Dispositions 
$ 
Total increase in net sales  $ 

(19.0) 
63.7 
35.6 
(3.2) 
77.1 

(1.4)%
4.6%
2.6%
(0.2)%
5.6%

We achieved record free cash flow of $120.9 million 
in 2008, an increase of $66.4 million over 2007 and 
representing 259.4% of 2008 net income. This increase 
is the result of improved processes and focused work-
ing  capital  management.  Although  early  in  their 
implementation,  we  are  seeing  immediate  benefits 
from  lean  manufacturing  techniques  and  sales  and 
operational planning systems. Cash generation will 
continue to be a focus area as we move into 2009.

2008 marked twenty-two years of continuous div-
idend payments to our shareholders, with a dividend 
of $0.11 per share in each quarter of 2008. We also 
purchased 1.6 million shares of our Class A Com-
mon Stock on the open market. The dividend and 
our share repurchase program returned $60.7 mil-
lion of cash to our shareholders in 2008.

Our net income declined $30.8 million, or 40.0%, 
to  $46.6  million  in  2008  primarily  attributable  to 
the losses we incurred in our China 
segment and a goodwill impairment 
of $17.3 million in our water qual-
ity  group.  Our  China  operations 
have experienced cost increases on 
several fronts due to the strength-
ening of the Chinese yuan, increas-
es in China value added taxes, wage 
inflation due to new labor laws and 
increased  costs  for  ocean  freight 
when the price of oil reached record 
levels in mid-year.

William C. McCartney
Chief Financial Officer

To Our Shareholders 
Blücher EuroPipe

Blücher Stainless Steel Drains

Blücher Floor Drain

European Pressure Reducing Valve

In  response  to  these  rising  costs,  we  have  intro-
duced lean manufacturing methodologies in all our 
China operations and we sold an underperforming 
manufacturing facility located in Tianjin, China. This 
facility,  which  manufactured  commodity  butterfly 
valves,  accounted  for  70.8%  of  our  China  segment 
losses through the sale date. We have also increased 
our  focus  in  the  fast-growing  water  infrastructure 
market in China. We are encouraged with the recent 
progress in our China operations as our 4th quarter 
results were profitable.

Consistent with our past practices, at December 
31, 2008 we continued to maintain our conservative 
capital  structure,  with  a  net  debt  to  capitalization 
ratio of 22.8%.

December 31, 
2008
(in millions)

Current portion of long-term debt  $ 
Plus: Long-term debt,  
                 net of current portion 
Less: Cash and cash equivalents 
Net debt 

$ 

4.5 

409.8 
(165.6)
248.7 

Net debt 
Plus: Total stockholders’ equity 
Capitalization 

$ 

248.7 
842.4 
$  1,091.1 

Net Debt to Capitalization Ratio 

22.8%

Our  next  scheduled  debt  repayment  is  in  May 
2010,  when  $50  million  is  scheduled  to  be  repaid.  
At  December  31,  2008,  we  had  $260.0  million  of 
unused  and  available  capital  from  an  existing  line 
of  credit.  We  believe  that  our  capital  structure,  in 
conjunction  with  our  cash  generating  capability,  is 
a critical component for success in the current eco-
nomic environment.     

On June 1, 2008, we acquired Blücher Metals for 
approximately $170 million, our largest acquisition 
to date. Blücher is a manufacturer of stainless steel 
drainage  products  based  in  Denmark.  Blücher’s 
2008  revenues  were  almost  $90  million.  Blücher 
provides us with a new product platform in Europe. 
We have a strong position in both 
the  plumbing  and  heating  mar-
kets  in  Europe,  and  the  addition  
of  Blücher  gives  us  a  leadership 
position in the stainless steel drain 
market.  Blücher  provides  us  with 
a strong brand, solid management 
team  and  many  growth  opportu-
nities.

We  are  pleased  that  David 
Coghlan  joined  us  this  year  as  
the  President  of  North  America 

David J. Coghlan
President of North America and Asia

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
European Backflow Preventers

Large Diameter Ball Valve

OneFlow® Anti-Scale Systems

Hot Water Recirculating System

Dead LevelTM Trench Drain

and Asia. David, most recently with 
Trane, Inc., has spent the majority 
of his career in multinational man-
ufacturing  companies.  Kenneth 
Lepage  was  promoted  to  Gen-
eral Counsel in August 2008. Ken 
joined  Watts  in  2003  as  Assistant 
General Counsel. We are confident 
David  and  Ken  will  continue  to 
make a meaningful contribution to 
Watts.

Kenneth R. Lepage
General Counsel and Secretary

Our  long  history  of  providing 
innovative  water  solutions  to  our 
customers continued in 2008 with 
the introduction of many promising new products.     
• In Europe, we launched a new range of backflow 

prevention devices and pressure reducing valves;

• In China, we introduced our first large diameter 

ball valve for the water infrastructure market;

•  In  North  America,  we  introduced  the  Dead 
LevelTM  trench  drain,  which  is  more  cost  efficient 
for installers; and

•  In  North  America,  we  also  premiered  the 
Watts OneFlow® anti-scale system, which prevents 
scale formation, thereby extending the life of pipes, 
plumbing fixtures and valves.

As  we  look  ahead,  we  see  many  growth  oppor-

tunities:

• We believe the demand for both energy and wa-
ter conservation products will continue to increase.     
We currently offer a broad product line to support 
the use of solar and geothermal power to heat water.     
We also have an extensive offering of products that 
conserve  water,  including  water  pressure  regulat-
ing valves that reduce water consumption by up to 
30%  while  supplying  a  constant  comfortable  pres-
sure, zero waste point-of-use reverse osmosis water 
filtration  systems  that  provide  better  than  bottle-
quality water while eliminating the water waste of 
a typical reverse osmosis system, and our hot water 
recirculating  system,  which  provides  instantaneous 
hot water at any tap or shower. 

•  We  expect  to  continue  to  enhance  our  cash 
flows by maintaining our focus on operational ex-
cellence. We are striving to increase our capabilities 
in  lean  manufacturing  techniques,  improve  logis-
tics management with widespread use of sales and 
operations planning, and increase our emphasis on 
capacity  utilization  through  manufacturing  foot-
print reductions. 

• We intend to maintain our disciplined acqui-
sition program to provide us access to new mar-

kets and technologies.

•  We  may  selectively 

trim our portfolio.

•  We  plan  to  lever-
age  our  worldwide  IT 
systems to reduce costs, 
improve working capital 
management  and  em-
power our employees.

2008

  was a year in which   
we were able to  
expand and strengthen 
our worldwide  

business  despite significant 

volatility in both our end markets and 

in the financial markets.

challenging  years  as  we 
navigate through a weak 
worldwide economy with 
soft  construction  mar-
kets and rapidly chang-
ing  foreign  exchange 
rates  and  commodity  
costs.  However,  we  be-
lieve that the combina-
tion of our capital structure, cash flow capability, 
our  leading  market  position  and  the  dedication 
of  our  6,300  associates  will  allow  us  to  steer  a 
steady course through these rough waters.

•  We  continue  to  work  to  provide  a  constant 
stream  of  innovative  new  products  that  solve  our 
customers’ water systems needs.

2009  will  present  us  with  one  of  our  more  

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Printed on Recycled Paper

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(cid:2) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  13  OR  15(d)  OF  THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE  ACT  OF  1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008

Or

(cid:3) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT  TO  SECTION 13  OR  15(d) OF  THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE  ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 001-11499

WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES,  INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)

815 Chestnut Street, North Andover, MA
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

04-2916536
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification  No.)

01845
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (978) 688-1811

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of  the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each  Exchange on Which Registered

Class  A  Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share

New York Stock Exchange

Indicate  by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned  issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities

Act.  Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate  by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports  pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange

Act.  Yes (cid:3) No (cid:2)

Indicate  by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all  reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for  such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been  subject to such filing requirements for the past 90  days. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3)

Indicate  by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers  pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will

not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive  proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:3)

Indicate  by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller

reporting company. See the definitions of  ‘‘large  accelerated  filer,’’  ‘‘accelerated filer’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer (cid:2)
Non-accelerated filer (cid:3)

Accelerated filer (cid:3)
Smaller reporting company  (cid:3)

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate  by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes (cid:3) No  (cid:2)

As of June 29, 2008, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s  common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was

approximately $708,165,326 based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

Indicate  the  number of shares outstanding of each of  the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class

Outstanding at February  20, 2009

Class A Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share
Class B Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share

29,407,648 shares
7,193,880 shares

Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 13, 2009, are incorporated

by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

DOCUMENTS INCOPORATED BY REFERENCE

Item 1. BUSINESS.

PART I

This  Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements which are not historical facts and are
considered forward-looking within the  meaning of the  Private  Securities  Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These forward-looking statements contain  projections of our future results of operations  or our  financial
position or state other forward-looking  information. In some cases you can  identify these forward-looking
statements by words such as ‘‘anticipate,’’  ‘‘believe,’’ ‘‘could,’’ ‘‘estimate,’’ ‘‘expect,’’ ‘‘intend,’’ ‘‘may,’’
‘‘should,’’ ‘‘will’’ and ‘‘would’’ or similar  words. You  should not rely on  forward-looking statements because
they involve known and unknown risks,  uncertainties  and other  factors, some of which are beyond our
control. These risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause  our actual results, performance or
achievements to differ materially from the anticipated  future results, performance or  achievements  expressed
or implied by the forward-looking statements. Some of the  factors  that  might cause  these differences are
described under Item 1A—‘‘Risk Factors.’’  You should  carefully review all  of these factors, and you should
be aware that there may be other factors  that could  cause these differences. These forward-looking
statements were based on information,  plans  and estimates at  the date of this report, and,  except as required
by law, we undertake no obligation to  update any forward-looking statements to  reflect changes in underlying
assumptions or factors, new information, future events or other changes.

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, references to ‘‘the Company,’’ ‘‘Watts,’’  ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or  ‘‘our’’

refer to Watts Water Technologies, Inc.  and its consolidated  subsidiaries.

Overview

Watts Regulator Co. was founded by  Joseph  E. Watts in  1874 in Lawrence, Massachusetts.  Watts
Regulator Co. started as a small machine  shop supplying parts to the New England  textile mills  of  the
19th century and grew into a global manufacturer of products and  systems focused on  the control,
conservation and quality of water and  the comfort and safety of the people using  it. Watts Water
Technologies, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware  in 1985  and  became the parent Company  of Watts
Regulator Co.

Our ‘‘Water by Watts’’ strategy is to be  the leading provider  of water quality, water conservation,

water safety and water flow control products for  the residential and  commercial  markets  in North
America and Europe and to expand our  presence  in Asia.  Our primary objective is  to  grow  earnings by
increasing sales within existing markets, expanding  into  new markets, leveraging  our distribution
channels and customer base, making  selected  acquisitions,  reducing manufacturing  costs and advocating
for the development and enforcement of industry  standards.

We  intend to continue to introduce products in existing  markets by  enhancing our preferred
brands, developing new complementary  products, promoting plumbing code development to drive  sales
of safety and water quality products  and  continually  improving merchandising in both the do-it-yourself
(DIY)  and wholesale distribution channels. We continually target selected new product  and geographic
markets based on growth potential, including our ability to leverage our existing  distribution channels.
Additionally, we continually leverage our  distribution channels through  the introduction  of  new
products, as  well as the integration of  products of our acquired companies.

We  intend to continue to generate growth by targeting selected acquisitions, both in our  core
markets as well as new complementary markets. We have  completed 32 acquisitions since divesting  our
industrial and oil and gas business in 1999, including one acquisition in each  of  2008 and 2007 and five
acquisitions in 2006. Our acquisition  strategy focuses on businesses  that manufacture preferred brand
name products that address our themes of water quality, water  safety, water conservation,  water flow
control and related complementary markets. We target businesses that  will provide us with  one or more
of the following: an entry into new markets, an increase in shelf space with existing  customers, strong
brand names, a new or improved technology or an  expansion of the breadth of  our Water by Watts
offerings.

2

We  are committed to reducing our manufacturing and operating  costs through a  combination  of
manufacturing in lower-cost countries,  using  Lean  Six Sigma to drive  continuous improvement across
all key processes, and consolidating our  diverse manufacturing operations in North America, Europe
and China. We have acquired a number of manufacturing  facilities in lower-cost regions such as China,
Bulgaria and Tunisia. In 2007, we announced a global  restructuring plan to reduce our manufacturing
footprint in order to reduce our costs  and to realize  additional  operating efficiencies.  In  February 2009,
we announced an additional plan to consolidate manufacturing in North America  and China. See
Recent Developments in Item 7, ‘‘Management’s Discussion and  Analysis of Financial Condition  and
Results of Operations’’ for more details.

Our products are sold to wholesale distributors  and  dealers,  major DIY chains and  original
equipment manufacturers (OEMs). Most  of our sales are for products that have been  approved under
regulatory standards incorporated into  state  and  municipal  plumbing, heating,  building and fire
protection codes in North America and Europe. We have consistently advocated the development and
enforcement of plumbing codes and are  committed to providing products  to  meet these standards,
particularly for safety and control valve  products.  These codes  serve as a competitive barrier to entry by
requiring that products sold in select  jurisdictions meet stringent  criteria.

Additionally, a majority of our manufacturing facilities are ISO 9000,  9001 or 9002 certified by the

International Organization for Standardization.

Our business is reported in three geographic segments: North America, Europe and China. The

contributions of each segment to net sales, operating  income and  the  presentation of certain other
financial information by segment are reported in Note  17 of the  Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements and in Management’s Discussion  and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included elsewhere in this  report.

Recent Acquisitions and Disposition

On May 30, 2008, we purchased all of the outstanding  share capital of Bl¨ucher Metal A/S
(Bl¨ucher) located in Vildbjerg, Denmark,  for  approximately $183.5 million,  which includes the
assumption of $13.4 million of debt,  net of cash acquired. Bl¨ucher is a leading provider of stainless
steel drainage systems in Europe to the residential, commercial  and industrial marketplaces  and is a
worldwide leader in providing stainless steel drainage products to the marine industry. Bl¨ucher’s main
products include push-fit stainless steel  pipes  and related fittings,  light-duty drains  for residential,
commercial and marine applications,  and drains for  heavy-duty industrial  applications including  brewery
and pharmaceutical applications.

During  the second quarter of 2008, we completed the acquisition of  the  remaining  40% ownership

of our Tianjin Tanggu Watts Valve Company Ltd.  joint venture in  China,  known as  TWT, for
$3.3 million in cash. TWT manufactured  products  to  support the U.S.  operations  as well as to sell  into
the local China market. In the third quarter  of  2008, we relocated the business supporting the U.S.
from TWT into an existing operation in China. We then entered into an agreement to sell TWT. Under
this  agreement, we determined that the  risks and rewards of  ownership of TWT were effectively
transferred to the buyer as of October 18, 2008.  We further determined that we were no longer the
primary beneficiary of the operating results  of TWT and therefore  had deconsolidated TWT as  of  the
agreement date. As the equity transfer from us to the  buyer has  not  yet  been approved by local
authorities, we deferred a $1.1 million  gain from the  sale. We expect to recognize the  gain during 2009,
upon final approval of the transfer by Chinese government authorities. The deferred gain has  been
recorded  as a current liability in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.

On November 9, 2007, we acquired the assets  and business of  Topway Global Inc. (Topway)

located in Brea, California for approximately $18.4  million. Topway manufactures a  wide variety  of
water softeners, point of entry filter units, and point of use  drinking water systems for residential,
commercial and industrial applications.

3

Products

We  believe that we have the broadest  range of products in terms of design distinction,  size and
configuration in a majority of our principal  product lines. In 2008 and 2007,  water quality  products
accounted for approximately 17% and 18%, respectively, of our total sales. Our principal  product lines
include:

(cid:129) water quality products, including backflow preventers and check valves  for  preventing reverse

flow within water lines and fire protection systems and point-of-use water  filtration and  reverse
osmosis systems for both commercial and  residential  applications;

(cid:129) a wide range of water pressure regulators for  both  commercial and residential  applications;

(cid:129) drainage products for industrial, commercial,  marine  and residential applications;

(cid:129) water supply products for commercial and residential applications;

(cid:129) temperature and pressure relief valves for water  heaters, boilers  and associated systems;

(cid:129) thermostatic mixing valves for tempering  water in  commercial and residential applications;

(cid:129) systems for under-floor radiant applications and hydraulic pump groups for  gas boiler

manufacturers and renewable energy applications, including solar and heat pump  control
packages;

(cid:129) flexible stainless steel connectors for  natural  and liquid  propane gas  in commercial food service

and residential applications; and

(cid:129) large  diameter butterfly valves for  use in  China’s  water infrastructure.

Customers and Markets

We  sell our products to plumbing, heating and mechanical wholesale distributors, major DIY

chains and OEMs.

Wholesalers. Approximately 65% of our sales in both 2008 and 2007 were to wholesale

distributors for both commercial and residential applications. We  rely on commissioned manufacturers’
representatives, some of which maintain a consigned inventory  of our  products, to market our product
lines. Additionally, various water quality  products are  sold  to  independent dealers  throughout North
America.

DIY. Approximately 13% and 15% of our  sales  in 2008 and 2007, respectively,  were to DIY
customers. Our DIY customers demand less  technical products, but are highly receptive to innovative
designs and new product ideas.

OEMs. Approximately 22% and 20% of our  sales  in 2008 and 2007, respectively,  were to
OEMs.  In North America, our typical OEM  customers are water heater manufacturers, equipment
manufacturers needing flow control devices  and water systems  manufacturers  needing backflow
preventers. Our sales to OEMs in Europe are primarily to boiler manufacturers, and radiant  systems
manufacturers. Our sales to OEMs in China are primarily to boiler and bath manufacturers including
manufacturers of faucet and shower products.

In both 2008 and 2007, no customer accounted for  more than 10% of our total net  sales. Our top

ten customers accounted for approximately  $293.9 million, or 20%,  of our  total net sales in 2008  and
$304.3 million, or 22%, of our total net  sales in 2007. Thousands of other customers constituted the
remaining 80% of our net sales in 2008  and  78% of our net sales in  2007.

4

Marketing and Sales

We  rely primarily on commissioned manufacturers’ representatives, some of which maintain a
consigned inventory of our products. These  representatives sell primarily  to  plumbing  and heating
wholesalers or service DIY store locations in  North  America. We also sell products  for the  residential
construction and home repair and remodeling industries through DIY plumbing retailers, national
catalog distribution companies, hardware stores, building  material outlets and retail  home center chains
and through plumbing and heating wholesalers.  In addition, we sell  products directly to certain  large
OEMs and private label accounts.

Manufacturing

We  have integrated and automated manufacturing  capabilities,  including a  bronze foundry,
machining, plastic extrusion and injection molding and assembly operations. Our  foundry operations
include metal pouring systems, automatic core making, yellow  brass forging  and brass  and bronze
die-castings. Our machining operations feature computer-controlled machine tools, high-speed  chucking
machines with robotics and automatic  screw machines  for machining  bronze, brass and steel
components. We have invested heavily  in recent years to expand  our manufacturing  capabilities  and to
ensure the availability of the most efficient and productive equipment. We  are committed to
maintaining our manufacturing equipment at  a level  consistent with  current technology  in order to
maintain high levels of quality and manufacturing efficiencies.

Capital expenditures and depreciation for each of  the last three  years  were  as follows:

Years Ended
December 31,

2008

2007

2006

Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$26.6
$31.8

(in millions)
$37.8
$28.9

$44.7
$26.7

The Company’s 2006 capital expenditures  included approximately $18.0  million related to the

purchase and subsequent sale-leaseback of a building in Italy.

Raw Materials

We  require substantial amounts of raw materials to produce our products,  including bronze, brass,

cast iron, steel and plastic, and substantially all of the raw materials we require are purchased from
outside sources. We had experienced increases in the  costs of certain  raw materials, particularly copper.
Bronze  and brass are copper-based alloys. Through July 3,  2008, copper prices rose significantly from
demands  in the worldwide marketplace.  The spot price  of copper, which  was  $4.08 at  July 3, 2008, had
increased approximately 186% from  December 2005. In response, we  implemented  price increases  for
some of our products that had become  more expensive to manufacture  due to the  increases in raw
material costs. During 2007 and 2006,  cost increases  in raw  materials were not completely  recovered by
increased selling prices or other product cost reductions. During the latter half of 2008, commodity
prices, including copper, decreased significantly as most  industrialized and emerging economies  began
experiencing economic recessions. The  spot  price of copper at December  31, 2008 was $1.32. We are
not able to predict whether commodity costs, including  copper, will  significantly  increase or decrease in
the future. If commodity costs increase  in the future and  we are not able  to  reduce or eliminate the
effect of the cost increases by reducing production costs  or implementing price increases, our  profit
margins could decrease. If commodity costs continue to decline,  we may experience pressures  from
customers to reduce our selling prices.  The timing of any price reductions  and decreases in commodity
costs may not align. Therefore, our near-term margins  in 2009  could decline.

5

Code Compliance

Products representing a majority of our sales are subject  to  regulatory standards and  code

enforcement which typically require that these products meet stringent performance criteria.  Standards
are established by such industry test and certification organizations as the American Society  of
Mechanical Engineers (A.S.M.E.), the Canadian Standards Association  (C.S.A.), the  American Society
of Sanitary Engineers (A.S.S.E.), the  University of Southern  California  Foundation for Cross-
Connection Control (USC FCC), the International  Association  of Plumbing and  Mechanical Officials
(I.A.P.M.O.), Factory Mutual (F.M.), the  National  Sanitation Foundation (N.S.F.) and Underwriters
Laboratory (U.L.). Many of these standards are incorporated into state  and municipal  plumbing  and
heating, building and fire protection codes.

National regulatory standards in Europe vary by  country. The major  standards and/or  guidelines
which  our products must meet are AFNOR (France), DVGW (Germany), UNI/ICIN (Italy), KIWA
(Netherlands), SVGW (Switzerland),  SITAC (Sweden) and WRAS (United Kingdom).  Further, there
are local regulatory standards requiring  compliance as  well.

Together with our commissioned manufacturers’ representatives, we have consistently  advocated for
the development and enforcement of plumbing  codes.  We  maintain stringent quality control and testing
procedures at each of our manufacturing  facilities in order to manufacture products in  compliance with
code requirements.

We  believe that product-testing capability and  investment in plant and equipment  is needed to

manufacture products in compliance  with code requirements. Additionally,  a majority of our
manufacturing facilities are ISO 9000,  9001 or 9002  certified  by the International  Organization  for
Standardization.

New Product Development and Engineering

We  maintain our own product development staff, design  teams, and testing  laboratories  in North

America, Europe and China that work to enhance our existing  products and develop new  products. We
maintain sophisticated product development and  testing laboratories. Research and  development costs
included in selling, general, and administrative  expense amounted to $17.5  million, $15.1 million  and
$12.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,  respectively.

California and Vermont recently enacted laws  that will  require  beginning on  January 1, 2010  that
all pipes, pipe and plumbing fittings  and  plumbing fixtures  sold in those states that convey or dispense
water for human consumption contain virtually no  lead content. Other states, including  Maryland, are
currently considering similar legislation and  we expect that similar laws  will  be  adopted in other states
in the future. We have invested considerable resources  over the past  several  years  to  develop  lead free
versions  of our plumbing products to comply with  these  new laws. We expect  that  our  lead  free product
offerings will be available for sale by  the fourth quarter of 2009,  which should allow our customers in
California and Vermont time to manage  their  inventories of  our products to prepare for the January 1,
2010 implementation date of the new lead  free standards.

Competition

The domestic and international markets for  water safety and  flow control devices are  intensely
competitive and require us to compete against some  companies possessing greater financial,  marketing
and other resources than ours. Due to the  breadth of our product offerings, the number and  identities
of our competitors vary by product line and market. We consider  brand preference, engineering
specifications, plumbing code requirements, price, technological expertise, delivery times and breadth of
product  offerings to be the primary competitive  factors. We believe  that new  product development  and
product  engineering are also important  to  success in  the water industry  and that our position in  the
industry is attributable in part to our  ability  to  develop new  and innovative  products quickly and  to
adapt and enhance existing products.  We  continue to develop new and innovative  products to enhance

6

market position and are continuing to implement manufacturing and design programs to reduce costs.
We  cannot be certain that our efforts  to  develop new  products  will be successful or that our customers
will accept our new products. Although we  own certain patents and trademarks that we  consider to be
of importance, we do not believe that  our  business and competitiveness as a  whole are  dependent on
any one of our patents or trademarks  or  on patent or  trademark  protection generally.

Backlog

Backlog was approximately $94.8 million at February 13, 2009  and was approximately
$116.8 million at February 15, 2008. We do not believe that our backlog at  any point in time is
indicative of future operating results.

Employees

As of December 31, 2008, our wholly-owned domestic and foreign operations employed
approximately 6,300 people. None of our  employees in North America or China  are covered  by
collective bargaining agreements. In some European  countries our employees are  subject to traditional
national collective bargaining agreements.  We believe that  our employee relations  are good.

Available Information

We  maintain a website with the address www.wattswater.com. The information contained on our

website is not included as a part of, or  incorporated by reference  into,  this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. Other than an investor’s  own internet  access charges,  we make available free of charge
through our website our Annual Report  on  Form 10-K, quarterly  reports on Form  10-Q  and current
reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these  reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we
have electronically filed such material  with, or furnished such material  to,  the Securities and  Exchange
Commission.

Certifications

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief  Financial Officer have  provided  the  certifications required

by rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of  1934,  copies  of which  are filed  as exhibits  to
this  Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, an  annual  chief executive officer certification was
submitted by our Chief Executive Officer to the  New  York  Stock Exchange  on May 19, 2008  in
accordance with the New York Stock  Exchange listing requirements.

7

Executive Officers and Directors

Set forth below are the names of our executive  officers and  directors, their  respective ages and
positions with our Company and a brief summary of their business experience for  at least the  past five
years:

Name

Age

Position

Patrick S. O’Keefe . . . . . . . . . .

56 Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

William C. McCartney . . . . . . .

54 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

J. Dennis Cawte . . . . . . . . . . .

58 Group Managing Director, Europe

David J. Coghlan . . . . . . . . . .

49

President of North America and Asia

Ernest E. Elliott . . . . . . . . . . .

57 Executive Vice President of Marketing

Michael  P. Flanders . . . . . . . . .

50 Executive Vice President of Manufacturing Operations, North

America and Asia

Josh C. Fu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

52

President, Asia

Kenneth  R. Lepage . . . . . . . . .

38 General Counsel and Secretary

Gregory J. Michaud . . . . . . . . .

47 Executive Vice President of Human Resources

Taylor K. Robinson . . . . . . . . .

45 Executive Vice President of Supply Chain Management

Douglas T. White . . . . . . . . . .

64 Group Vice President

Robert L. Ayers(1)(3) . . . . . . .

63 Director

Kennett F. Burnes(1)(3) . . . . . .

66 Director

Richard J. Carthcart(2) . . . . . .

64 Director

Timothy P. Horne . . . . . . . . . .

70 Director

Ralph E. Jackson Jr.(2)(3) . . . .

67 Director

Kenneth  J. McAvoy(1)(3) . . . .

68 Director

John K. McGillicuddy(1) . . . . .

65 Director

Gordon W. Moran(2)(3) . . . . .

70 Non-Executive Chairman of the Board and Director

Daniel J. Murphy, III(2)(3) . . .

67 Director

(1) Member of the Audit Committee

(2) Member of the Compensation Committee

(3) Member of the Nominating and  Corporate Governance Committee

Patrick S. O’Keefe joined our Company in 2002. Prior to joining our Company, he served as

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Industrial  Distribution Group, a supplier  of
maintenance, repair, operating and production products,  from  1999 to 2001.  He  was Chief  Executive
Officer of Zep Manufacturing, a unit  of National Service Industries and a  manufacturer of  specialty
chemicals throughout North America, Europe and Australia, from 1997 to 1999.  He  also held various
senior management positions with Crane  Co.  from 1994 to  1997.

William C. McCartney joined our Company in 1985 as Controller. He was appointed our Vice

President of Finance in 1994 and served as our Corporate Controller  from 1988 to 1999.  He was

8

appointed Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer in  2000. He served  as Secretary of the Company from
January 2000 to November 2005.

J. Dennis Cawte joined our Company in 2001 and was  appointed  Group Managing Director

Europe. Prior to joining our Company,  he was European President of PCC Valve and Controls,  a
division of Precision Castparts Corp.,  a manufacturer of components and castings to the  aeronautical
industry, from 1999 to 2001. He had  also  worked for approximately  20 years for  Keystone Valve
International, a manufacturer and distributor  of  industrial valves, where his  most recent position was
the Managing Director Northern Europe, Middle East, Africa and India.

David J.  Coghlan joined our Company in June 2008 as President of  North America and Asia. Prior

to joining our Company, Mr. Coghlan  served as Vice President, Global  Parts of Trane Inc., a global
manufacturer of commercial and residential  heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment, from
April 2004 through May 2008. He also  held  several management positions  within the Climate Control
Technologies segment of Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited, a manufacturer  of transport temperature
control units and refrigerated display merchandisers, from  1995 to December  2003. Before  joining
Ingersoll-Rand, Mr. Coghlan worked  for several years with the  management consulting firm of
McKinsey & Co. in both the United  Kingdom and United States.

Ernest E. Elliott joined our Company in 1986 and has served in  a variety  of sales and marketing

roles. He was appointed Vice President of  Sales  in 1991, served  as Executive Vice President of
Wholesale Sales and Marketing from  1996 to March 2003, Executive Vice President of  Wholesale
Marketing from March 2003 to February  2006 and as Executive Vice President of Marketing since
February 2006. Mr. Elliott temporarily  assumed responsibilities of our former  Chief Operating  Officer
and President of North American and Asian Operations in September  2007. Prior to joining  our
Company, he was Vice President of BTR Inc.’s Valve Group, a diversified manufacturer of industrial
and commercial valve products.

Michael  P. Flanders joined our Company in October 2007  as Executive Vice President of
Manufacturing Operations, North America and Asia. From August 2005  to  July 2007, he  served as
President and Chief Operating Officer of Aavid Thermalloy, LLC, an international manufacturing
company providing thermal management solutions to the  computer and electronics industries. From
July 2003 to April  2005, he was Vice  President and General Manager of Waukesha  Bearings
Corporation, a manufacturer of hydrodynamic and active  magnetic bearings  and a  subsidiary of  Dover
Corporation. From November 1998 to July 2003, he was  General Manager of the LCN Division  of
Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited, which manufactured  mechanical and  electronic  door  control
products.

Josh C. Fu joined our Company in January 2008  as President, Asia.  From  January 2007  to

December 2007, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Reradiant
International Co. Ltd., a consulting firm  focused on the energy  and industrial goods industries.  From
August 2004 to December 2006, he served as President of the  China  operations of Flowserve
Corporation, a global manufacturer of flow control equipment,  including valves, pumps,  and seals.
From July 2003 to August 2004, he was  Executive  Vice President, Product  Development and
Merchandise Sourcing for Intercon Merchandise Sourcing, an  importer of consumer goods from  China.
From 2000 to 2003, he held various senior  management positions  with the  China operations of BP
p.l.c., a worldwide petroleum and petrochemicals company.

Kenneth R. Lepage was appointed General Counsel and Secretary  of the Company in August 2008.

Mr. Lepage originally joined our Company in September 2003  as Assistant General Counsel and
Assistant Secretary. Prior to joining our Company, he was a junior  partner at the law firm of Hale and
Dorr LLP (now Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr  LLP).

Gregory J. Michaud joined our Company in April 2006 as Executive Vice  President  of Human

Resources. Prior to joining our Company, he  served  as Vice President, Human Resources of the

9

Compact Equipment division of Ingersoll-Rand  Company Limited, a diversified industrial  company,
from June 2003 through March 2006. He  served  as Vice President, Human  Resources  of  the
Productivity Solutions division of Ingersoll-Rand from January 2003 to June 2003 and as Director,
Human Resources & Corporate Organizational  Planning  of  Ingersoll-Rand from June 2000 to
December 2002.

Taylor K. Robinson joined our Company in September 2007  as Executive  Vice President  of Supply
Chain Management. From January 2007 to August  2007, he owned and operated a consulting company
named Global Supply Chain Solutions, which provided  advice to international clients to improve their
global  supply chain methods and operations. From February 2004 to April 2006,  he  was  Chief
Procurement Officer for H.J. Heinz Company,  an international manufacturer  and marketer of
processed foods. From January 1999  to  January 2004, he served in various positions for  Honeywell
International Inc., a diversified technology  and  manufacturing  company,  including  Global Supply Chain
Director, Aviation Aftermarket Services, Director of Global  Sourcing, Aerospace Electronic Systems
and Corporate Director of Global Commodity Management—Electronics.

Douglas T. White joined our Company in 2001 as Group Vice President. Prior to joining  our

Company he was employed by Honeywell International, Inc.,  a  diversified technology  and
manufacturing company, as Vice President  of  Marketing—Consumer Products Group from  1998 to
2001.

Robert L. Ayers has served as a director of our Company since October  2006.  He was Senior Vice
President of ITT Industries and President of ITT Industries’ Fluid Technology from  October 1999  until
September 2005. Mr. Ayers continued to be employed by ITT  Industries from September 2005 until his
retirement in September 2006, during which time he  focused on special projects for  the company.
Mr. Ayers joined ITT Industries in 1998  as President  of  ITT Industries’ Industrial  Pump Group. Before
joining ITT Industries, he was President  of Sulzer Industrial USA  and Chief Executive Officer of Sulzer
Bingham, a pump manufacturer. He is  a director  of  T-3  Energy  Services, Inc.

Kennett F. Burnes became a director of our Company in February 2009. Mr. Burnes is the retired

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of  Cabot Corporation, a global  specialty chemicals
company. He was Chairman from 2001 to March 2008, President  from  1995 to January  2008 and  Chief
Executive Officer from 2001 to January 2008.  Prior to joining Cabot Corporation in  1987, Mr. Burnes
was a partner at the Boston-based law  firm of Choate, Hall &  Stewart,  where he specialized in
corporate and business law for nearly  20 years. He is  a director of State Street Corporation, a member
of the Dana Farber Cancer Institute’s  Board of Trustees and  a  board member  of  the New  England
Conservatory. Mr. Burnes is also Chairman of the Board  of  Trustees  of the Schepens Eye  Research
Institute.

Richard J. Cathcart has served as a director of our Company since October 2007.  He was Vice

Chairman and a member of the Board of Directors of Pentair,  Inc. from  February  2005 until his
retirement in September 2007. Pentair is  a diversified  manufacturing  company consisting  of  two
operating segments: Water Technologies and Technical  Products.  He was appointed President and  Chief
Operating Officer of Pentair’s Water Technologies  Group in  January 2001 and served in  that  capacity
until his appointment as Vice Chairman  in February  2005. He began his career  at Pentair in March
1995 as Executive Vice President, Corporate  Development, where he  identified water as a strategic  area
of growth. In February 1996, he was named Executive  Vice President and  President of Pentair’s Water
Technologies Group. Prior to joining  Pentair, he held several management and business development
positions during his 20-year career with Honeywell International  Inc.  He is a  director of Fluidra S.A.

Timothy P. Horne has served as a director of our Company since 1962. He  became an  employee of

our  Company in 1959 and served as our  President from  1976  to  1978, from  1994 to 1997 and from 1999
to 2002. He served as our Chief Executive Officer from  1978 to 2002, and he served as  Chairman of
our  Board of Directors from 1986 to  2002. He retired as an  employee  of our Company on
December 31, 2002. Since his retirement, he  has continued to serve  our Company as a  consultant.

10

Ralph E. Jackson,  Jr. has served as a director of our Company since 2004. He worked for Cooper

Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of electrical products,  from 1985  until  his retirement  in December
2003. Prior to joining Cooper Industries, he worked for the Bussmann  and Air  Comfort divisions of
McGraw-Edison from 1976 until McGraw-Edison was  acquired  by Cooper Industries in 1985.  While
with Cooper Industries, he served as  Chief Operating  Officer from 2000 to  December 2003,  Executive
Vice President, Electrical Operations from 1992  to  2000, and President, Bussmann Division from  the
time McGraw-Edison was acquired by  Cooper Industries  to  1992. He served as a member of the  Board
of Directors of Cooper Industries from 2000 to December 2003.

Kenneth J. McAvoy has served as a director of our Company since 1994. He  was Controller  of our

Company from 1981 to 1985 and Chief Financial  Officer and  Treasurer from 1986  to  1999. He also
served as Vice President of Finance from 1984 to 1994; Executive  Vice President  of  European
Operations from 1994 to 1996; and Secretary from 1985  to  1999. He retired from our Company on
December 31, 1999.

John K. McGillicuddy has served as a director of our Company since 2003. He was employed by

KPMG LLP, a public accounting firm,  from 1965 until  his retirement  in 2000. He was  elected  into  the
Partnership at KPMG LLP in June 1975 where  he  served as Audit Partner, SEC  Reviewing  Partner,
Partner-in-Charge of Professional Practice, Partner-in-Charge of College Recruiting and
Partner-in-Charge of Staff Scheduling.  He  is a  director of Brooks  Automation, Inc. and Cabot
Corporation.

Gordon W. Moran has served as a director of our Company since 1990. He has been the Chairman

of Hollingsworth & Vose Company, a paper manufacturer, since  1997, and served as its President and
Chief Executive Officer from 1983 to 1998.

Daniel J. Murphy, III has served as a director of our Company since 1986. He has been the

Chairman of Northmark Bank, a commercial  bank he founded, since 1987. Prior to forming Northmark
Bank in 1987, he was a Managing Director  of  Knightsbridge Partners, a venture  capital firm, from
January to August 1987, and President  and a director of Arltru Bancorporation, a bank holding
company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary,  Arlington Trust  Company, from 1980  to  1986.

Product Liability, Environmental and Other Litigation Matters

We  are subject to a variety of potential liabilities  connected with our business operations, including

potential liabilities and expenses associated with possible product defects  or failures and compliance
with environmental laws. We maintain product liability and other insurance  coverage,  which we believe
to be generally in  accordance with industry practices. Nonetheless,  such insurance  coverage  may not be
adequate to protect us fully against substantial damage claims.

Contingencies

James Jones Litigation

On June 25, 1997, Nora Armenta (the Relator) filed  a civil action  in the California Superior Court
for Los Angeles County (the Armenta  case) against James  Jones Company  (James Jones), Mueller  Co.,
Tyco International (U.S.), and the Company.  We formerly owned James  Jones. The Relator filed under
the qui tam provision of the California  state False  Claims  Act, Cal. Govt. Code §  12650 et seq.
(California False Claims Act) and generally  alleged that James Jones and the  other defendants violated
this  statute by delivering some ‘‘defective’’ or ‘‘non-conforming’’ waterworks parts to municipal water
systems in the State of California. The  Relator filed a First Amended  Complaint in November  1998
and a Second Amended Complaint in  December 2000,  which brought the total number of plaintiffs to
161. The Complaint further alleges that  purchased  non-conforming James  Jones waterworks parts may
leach into public drinking water elevated amounts  of  lead that  may create a public health risk  because
they were made out of ‘81 bronze alloy (UNS No. C8440) and contain more  lead than the  specified
and advertised ‘85 bronze alloy (UNS No. C83600).  This  contention is based on  the average difference

11

of about 2% lead content between ‘81 bronze (6% to 8%  lead)  and  ‘85 bronze (4% to 6%  lead) and
the assumption that this would mean  increased consumable lead in public drinking water  that  could
cause  a public health concern. We believe the evidence  and discovery available to date indicates that
this  is not the case. In addition, ‘81 bronze is used extensively in  municipal and  home plumbing systems
and is approved by municipal, local and national  codes.  The Federal Environmental Protection Agency
also defines metal for pipe fittings with  no more than 8% lead as ‘‘lead free’’ under Section 1417  of the
Federal Safe Drinking Water Act.

In this case, the Relator seeks three times an unspecified amount of actual damages and alleges
that the municipalities have suffered  hundreds of millions of dollars  in damages.  She also  seeks civil
penalties of $10,000 for each false claim and alleges  that defendants  are  responsible for tens  of
thousands of false claims. Finally, the  Relator requests an  award of costs of  this action,  including
attorneys’ fees.

In December 1998, the Los Angeles Department of  Water and Power (LADWP)  intervened  in this
case and filed a complaint. We settled  with the  city of Los Angeles, by  far the most significant  city, for
$7.3 million plus attorneys’ fees. Co-defendants contributed $2.0  million toward this settlement.

In August 2003, an additional settlement payment  was  made for $13.0  million  ($11.0  million from

us and $2.0 million from James Jones),  which  settled the claims of  the three Phase I cities  (Santa
Monica, San Francisco and East Bay Municipal  Utility District) chosen by the Relator as having the
strongest claims to be tried first. In addition to this $13.0 million payment, we are obligated to pay the
Relator’s attorney’s fees.

On June 22, 2005, the Court dismissed the  claims of the Phase  II cities selected for  a second trial

phase (Contra Costa, Corona, Santa  Cruz and  Vallejo). The Court ruled that the Relator and  these
cities were required to show that the cities  had received out  of specification parts which  were related to
specific  invoices and that this showing had  not  been made. Although each  city’s claim is unique, this
ruling is significant for the claims of the  remaining cities, and the Relator appealed. On June  29, 2007,
the appellate court dismissed this appeal. However, this  judgment can be appealed again  at the
conclusion of the entire case. The trial  court has  scheduled a trial on October 6, 2009  for six Phase  III
cities. Litigation is  inherently uncertain, and  we are unable  to  predict  the outcome of this case.

On September 15, 2004, the Relator’s attorneys filed a lawsuit in the California Superior Court

for the City of Banning and 42 other cities and water  districts against James Jones, Watts and
Mueller Co. based on the same transactions alleged in the  Armenta case alleging common law fraud.
In October 2008, the Court dismissed  the claims  of  11 cities as time-barred. A first phase trial of
selected  cities is scheduled for April 13, 2010. Litigation is inherently uncertain,  and we are unable  to
predict the outcome of this case.

On February 14, 2001, after our insurers had denied coverage  for the  claims in the  Armenta case,

we filed a complaint for coverage against our insurers in the  California  Superior Court  (the coverage
case). James Jones filed a similar complaint, the  cases were  consolidated, and  the trial court  made
summary adjudication rulings that Zurich must pay all reasonable  defense costs incurred  by  us  and
James Jones in the Armenta case since  April 23,  1998 as well as such  defense  costs in  the future until
the end of the Armenta case. In August  2004, the California Court of Appeal affirmed these rulings,
and, on December 1, 2004, the California Supreme Court denied Zurich’s appeal  of this  decision. This
denial permanently established Zurich’s  obligation  to  pay Armenta  defense costs for both us and James
Jones, and Zurich is currently making payments of  incurred Armenta defense  costs. However, as noted
below, Zurich asserts that the defense  costs paid by it are subject to reimbursement.

On November 22, 2002, the trial court  entered a summary adjudication order that Zurich  must
indemnify and pay us and James Jones for  amounts paid to settle  with the  City of  Los  Angeles. On
August 6, 2004, the trial court made another summary adjudication ruling  that  Zurich must indemnify
and pay us and James Jones for the  $13.0 million paid to settle the  claims of the Phase I  cities

12

described above. Zurich will be able  to  appeal  these orders at the  end  of the coverage case.  Zurich has
now made all of the payments required by  these indemnity orders.

On February 8, 2006, Zurich filed a motion to set  aside as void the November 22, 2002  and

August 6, 2004 summary adjudication indemnity  payment orders. After  this  motion was denied, Zurich’s
appeal was also denied and the California Supreme Court denied Zurich’s petition  for review.  We are
currently unable to predict the finality  of these indemnity payment orders since  Zurich can also appeal
them at the end of the coverage case.

Zurich has asserted that all amounts  paid by it to us and  James Jones are subject to

reimbursement under Deductible Agreements  related to the insurance policies between Zurich and
Watts. We believe that the agreements  are  unenforceable, that the  Armenta case should be viewed as
one occurrence, and that the deductible  amount should be $0.5  million per occurrence  if  the
agreements are enforceable.

On January 31, 2006, the federal district court  in Chicago, Illinois determined that there are
disputes under all Deductible Agreements in  effect during the period  in which Zurich  issued primary
policies and that the arbitrator could  decide  which agreements would control reimbursement  claims. We
appealed this ruling. On October 20, 2006, the  United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
affirmed that an arbitration panel could decide which  deductible agreements  between  Zurich and us
would control Zurich’s reimbursement claim.

Based on management’s assessment,  we do not believe  that  the ultimate  outcome of the

James Jones Litigation will have a material adverse effect on our  liquidity, financial condition or results
of operations. While this assessment is based on  the facts currently known by us, litigation is  inherently
uncertain, the actual liability to us to resolve this litigation fully cannot be predicted  with any certainty
and there exists a reasonable possibility  that we may ultimately incur  losses in  the James  Jones
Litigation in excess of the amount accrued. We intend to continue  to  contest vigorously all aspects of
the James Jones Litigation.

Environmental Remediation

We  have been named as a potentially  responsible party with respect to a limited number of
identified contaminated sites. The levels of  contamination vary significantly from site  to  site as do  the
related levels of remediation efforts.  Environmental liabilities  are  recorded based  on the  most probable
cost, if known, or on the estimated minimum cost of  remediation. We  accrue  estimated  environmental
liabilities based on assumptions, which  are  subject to a number of  factors and uncertainties.
Circumstances which can affect the reliability and precision of these  estimates  include identification of
additional sites, environmental regulations, level  of  cleanup  required, technologies available, number
and financial condition of other contributors to remediation and the time  period over  which
remediation  may occur. We recognize changes  in estimates as new  remediation requirements are
defined or as new information becomes  available.

Based on the facts currently known to us,  we do not believe  that the ultimate outcome of these
matters will have a material adverse  effect on our  liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.
Some of our environmental matters are inherently  uncertain and there exists a  possibility that we  may
ultimately incur losses from these matters  in excess of the  amount  accrued. However, we cannot
currently estimate the amount of any  such additional losses.

Asbestos Litigation

We  are defending approximately 105 lawsuits  in different jurisdictions, with  the greatest  number

filed in Mississippi and California state courts,  alleging injury  or  death as  a result of  exposure to
asbestos. The complaints in these cases typically  name a large number of defendants and  do  not
identify any particular Watts products  as a source of  asbestos exposure. To date, we have obtained a
dismissal in every case before it has reached  trial because  discovery has  failed to yield evidence of

13

substantial exposure to any Watts products. Based on the  facts  currently  known to us,  we do not believe
that the ultimate outcome of these claims will have a  material adverse  effect on  our liquidity,  financial
condition or results of operations.

Other Litigation

Other lawsuits and proceedings or claims,  arising  from the ordinary course of operations, are also
pending or threatened against us. Based on the facts currently known to us, we do not believe that the
ultimate outcome of these other litigation matters  will  have a material  adverse effect  on our liquidity,
financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS.

Current  economic cycles, particularly reduced levels of residential and non-residential  starts and remodeling,
may continue to have an adverse effect on our  revenues and operating results.

We  have experienced and expect to continue to experience fluctuations  in revenues  and operating

results due to economic and business cycles. The  businesses of most  of  our  customers,  particularly
plumbing and heating wholesalers and home  improvement retailers, are cyclical. Therefore,  the level of
our  business activity has been cyclical, fluctuating  with economic cycles. The current economic
downturn may also affect the financial  stability  of  our  customers, which could impact their ability to pay
amounts owed vendors, including us. We also believe our level  of business activity is influenced by
residential and non-residential starts and renovation  and remodeling, which are, in turn, heavily
influenced by interest rates, consumer debt levels,  changes in disposable income,  employment growth
and consumer confidence. The current  conditions in  the housing and debt markets have caused  a
significant reduction in residential and  non-residential starts and renovation and remodeling. These
conditions have caused a decrease in  our revenue and profit. If  these conditions  continue or worsen in
the future, our revenues and profits could decrease and could result  in a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to make large acquisitions may  be  limited due to the current credit  market conditions.

As widely reported, the financial markets worldwide have been experiencing, among other things,

severely diminished liquidity and credit  availability. One of our  strategies is to increase our revenues
and profitability and expand our markets through acquisitions.  We may  require capital in  excess  of our
available cash and the unused portion of our  revolving credit facility to make large acquisitions, which
we would generally obtain from access to the credit markets.  However,  the current  economic
environment may adversely impact the  availability and cost of credit in the future. There can be no
assurance that if a large acquisition is identified  that we would  have access to sufficient capital to
complete such acquisition.

Sales of our products to customers serving  the commercial market  may  be impacted by the delay or
cancellation of projects due to the current  credit market conditions.

Our products are sold to commercial  builders and others  in the commercial construction market.
The current credit  market conditions may  prevent commercial builders or developers  from obtaining
the necessary capital to continue existing projects or to start new projects. This may result  in the delay
or cancellation of orders from our customers or potential customers  and may adversely affect our
revenues and our ability to manage inventory levels,  collect  customer receivables  and maintain
profitability.

14

Our ability to improve our profitability  through the introduction of new  technology in the manufacturing
process may be delayed due to the reallocation of capital.

With the current economic outlook worldwide, it  is necessary for  us to make decisions on  the best
immediate use of capital. In reaching those decisions, certain planned capital expenditures which  would
modernize or improve throughput at our  manufacturing  locations may be delayed until the current
credit market improves. The delay of  these  capital expenditures may  impact  our ability  to  realize
efficiencies through new technologies  and may result  in increased maintenance costs in the  business.

We face intense competition and, if we are not able  to respond to competition in  our  markets, our revenues
may decrease.

Competitive pressures in our markets could adversely  affect  our competitive position, leading to a

possible loss of market share or a decrease in prices, either of which could result in decreased  revenues
and profits. We encounter intense competition in  all areas of our business. Additionally, we  believe our
customers are attempting to reduce the  number of  vendors  from  which they purchase in order to
reduce the size and diversity of their  inventories and  their  transaction costs. To remain competitive, we
will need to invest continually in manufacturing, marketing, customer service  and support and  our
distribution networks. We may not have  sufficient resources to continue  to  make such investments and
we may be unable to maintain our competitive position. In addition,  we  anticipate  that  we may  have to
reduce the prices of some of our products to stay competitive, potentially resulting in a  reduction in the
profit margin for, and inventory valuation  of,  these products. Some of our competitors  are based in
foreign countries and have cost structures  and  prices in foreign  currencies. Accordingly, currency
fluctuations could cause our U.S. dollar-priced products  to be less competitive  than our competitors’
products which are priced in other currencies.

Reductions or interruptions in the supply of raw materials and  changes in the costs of raw materials could
reduce our profit margins and adversely affect our  ability to meet our customer delivery  commitments.

We  require substantial amounts of raw materials, including bronze, brass, cast iron, steel and
plastic and substantially all of the raw  materials we require are purchased from  outside sources. The
availability and costs of raw materials may  be  subject to curtailment  or  change due to, among other
things, new laws or regulations, suppliers’ allocations to other  purchasers,  interruptions in production
by suppliers and changes in exchange rates and worldwide price and demand levels. We typically do  not
enter into long-term supply agreements.  Our inability to obtain adequate  supplies of raw materials for
our  products at favorable costs, or at  all,  could have  a material adverse effect on our  business,  financial
condition or results of operations by decreasing our  profit margins and by  hindering  our  ability  to
deliver products to our customers on  a  timely basis. During  2006 and  continuing through approximately
July 3, 2008, commodity costs rose significantly from demands  in the worldwide  marketplace.  During
the latter half of 2008, commodity costs, including copper, decreased significantly as most industrialized
and emerging economies began experiencing recessions. If  we cannot  maintain  our selling prices  before
our  inventory costs reflect the recent rapid  decline in copper prices  our profitability could decline.
Should commodity costs increase substantially again  in the future, we may not be able  to  completely
recover such costs, as happened in 2006 and 2007, through selling price increases  to  our  customers or
other product cost reductions, which would  have a negative  effect on  our financial results. Additionally,
we continue to purchase increased levels  of  finished  product from international sources. If there  is an
interruption in delivering these finished products to our domestic  warehouses,  this  could  have a
negative effect on our financial results.

Implementation of our acquisition strategy  may not be successful, which could affect our ability  to increase
our revenues or our profitability.

One  of our strategies is to increase our  revenues and profitability  and  expand our markets through
acquisitions that will provide us with complementary water-related products and  increase market share
for our  existing product lines. We cannot be certain  that we will be able to identify, acquire or

15

profitably manage additional companies or successfully integrate such additional companies without
substantial costs, delays or other problems. Also,  companies acquired  recently and in the future may
not achieve revenues, profitability or  cash flows that justify our  investment in them. We expect to spend
significant time and effort in expanding  our  existing businesses  and identifying, completing  and
integrating acquisitions. We have faced  increasing competition for acquisition candidates which have
resulted in significant increases in the purchase prices of many acquisition candidates.  This competition,
and the resulting purchase price increases, may limit the  number of acquisition  opportunities available
to us, possibly leading to a decrease  in  the rate of growth  of our  revenues  and profitability.  In  addition,
acquisitions may involve a number of special risks, including,  but not limited to:

(cid:129) inadequate internal controls over financial  reporting and  our ability to bring such  controls into
compliance with the requirements of Section 404  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of 2002 in  a timely
manner;

(cid:129) adverse short-term effects on our reported operating results;

(cid:129) diversion of management’s attention;

(cid:129) investigations of, or challenges to, acquisitions by competition  authorities;

(cid:129) loss of key personnel at acquired companies;  and

(cid:129) unanticipated management or operational problems or  legal liabilities.

We are subject to risks related to product  defects, which could result in product recalls and could  subject us to
warranty claims in excess of our warranty  provisions or  which are greater than anticipated due to  the
unenforceability of liability limitations.

We  maintain strict quality controls and procedures, including the testing of raw  materials  and
safety testing of selected finished products.  However,  we cannot  be  certain that our  testing will reveal
latent defects in our products or the materials from which they are made, which may  not  become
apparent until after the products have  been  sold  into  the market. We  also cannot be certain that our
suppliers will always eliminate latent defects  in products  we purchase from  them. Accordingly,  there is
a risk that product defects will occur,  which could  require a  product recall.  Product recalls  can be
expensive to implement and, if a product recall occurs  during the product’s warranty period,  we may be
required to replace the defective product. In addition, a product  recall may  damage our relationship
with our customers and we may lose  market  share with our  customers. Our insurance policies may not
cover the costs of a product recall.

Our standard warranties contain limits on damages  and  exclusions of liability for  consequential

damages and for misuse, improper installation, alteration, accident or mishandling while in the
possession of someone other than us. We may incur additional operating  expenses if our warranty
provision  does not reflect the actual cost  of  resolving issues related to defects  in our products.  If these
additional expenses are significant, it could adversely affect  our business,  financial  condition  and results
of operations.

We face risks from product liability and  other  lawsuits,  which may adversely affect our  business.

We  have been and expect to continue to be subject to various product  liability claims  or other
lawsuits, including, among others, that our products include inadequate or  improper instructions  for use
or installation, or inadequate warnings concerning the  effects of the failure of our products.  In  the
event that we do not have adequate insurance or  contractual indemnification, damages from these
claims would have to be paid from our assets and could have a material adverse effect on  our results of
operations, liquidity and financial condition.  We,  like other  manufacturers  and distributors  of  products
designed to control and regulate fluids  and  gases, face an  inherent risk  of exposure  to  product liability
claims and other lawsuits in the event that the use  of our products results in personal  injury,  property
damage  or business interruption to our customers.  Although we  maintain strict quality controls and

16

procedures, including the testing of raw materials  and safety testing of selected  finished  products, we
cannot be certain that our products will be completely free  from defect. In addition, in certain  cases,
we rely on third-party manufacturers for our products or components of our products. Although  we
have product liability and general insurance coverage, we  cannot be certain that this insurance  coverage
will continue to be available to us at a  reasonable  cost, or, if available, will be adequate to cover  any
such liabilities. For more information, see  ‘‘Item  1. Business—Product Liability, Environmental and
Other Litigation Matters.’’

Economic and other risks associated with international sales and operations could  adversely  affect our
business and future operating results.

Since we sell and manufacture our products worldwide, our  business is  subject to risks associated

with doing business internationally. Our  business and future operating  results could be harmed  by  a
variety of factors, including:

(cid:129) trade protection measures and import or  export licensing  requirements, which could increase our

costs of doing business internationally;

(cid:129) potentially negative consequences from changes in tax laws, which  could  have an adverse impact

on our profits;

(cid:129) difficulty in staffing and managing widespread operations, which  could  reduce our productivity;

(cid:129) costs of compliance with differing labor regulations,  especially in  connection with  restructuring

our  overseas operations;

(cid:129) natural disasters and public health emergencies;

(cid:129) laws of some foreign countries, which may not protect our  intellectual property rights to the

same extent as the laws of the United States;  and

(cid:129) unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, which  may be costly and require  time to

implement.

Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates could materially affect our reported results.

We  are exposed to fluctuations in foreign  currencies,  as a portion of our sales and  certain  portions
of our costs, assets and liabilities are  denominated in currencies other than U.S.  dollars. Approximately
45.3% of our sales during the year ended  December 31,  2008 were from sales outside of the U.S.
compared to 41.7% for the year ended December 31, 2007.  For the years ended  December 31, 2008
and 2007, the appreciation of the euro against the U.S. dollar had a positive impact on  sales  of
approximately $31.3 million and $34.1  million,  respectively. There were also minor impacts on  sales in
other European currencies such as the  pound sterling and Danish krone against the U.S. dollar.
Additionally, our Canadian operations  require significant amounts of U.S. purchases for their
operations. Instead of buying or manufacturing domestically,  we  currently  have a favorable  cost
structure for certain goods we source from  our  wholly-owned subsidiaries in China and our outside
vendors. In 2005, China revalued its currency higher against  the  U.S.  dollar  and stated  it would  no
longer tie the yuan to a fixed rate against the U.S. currency. The yuan was valued at 6.8 and 7.3 at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. China  also stated it will peg the  yuan against  numerous
currencies, although it will keep the yuan in a  tight band rather than letting it  trade freely.  The spot
rate of the euro and Canadian dollar  decreased in value  and the yuan increased in value from
December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2008  by approximately 19%, 5% and 6% respectively, against  the
U.S. dollar. If our  share of revenue and purchases  in non-dollar  denominated  currencies continues to
increase in future  periods, exchange  rate fluctuations will likely have a greater impact on our results  of
operations and financial condition.

17

Our ability to achieve savings through our restructuring plans may be  impacted  by local regulations or factors
beyond the control of management.

We  implemented restructuring plans  in 2007 and in 2009. Management’s plans include  a number  of

steps that we believe are necessary to  reduce  operating costs  and increase efficiencies  throughout our
manufacturing footprint. Although we  have  considered the impact  of  local regulations, negotiations with
employee representatives, the timing  of  capital  expenditures necessary to prepare facilities and  the
related costs associated with these activities, factors beyond the control of  management may impact the
timing and therefore impact when the  savings will be achieved under the  plans. Further, if we  are not
successful in completing the restructuring projects in the  time frames contemplated or if additional
issues arise during the projects that add  costs or  disrupt  customer service, then our operating results
could be negatively affected.

If we cannot continue operating our manufacturing facilities  at current or higher utilization levels,  our  results
of operations could be adversely affected.

The equipment and management systems  necessary  for the operation of our manufacturing

facilities may break down, perform poorly or fail, resulting in fluctuations in our ability to manufacture
our  products and to achieve manufacturing efficiencies. We operate a  number of manufacturing
facilities, all of which are subject to this  risk, and such fluctuations at any of these facilities could cause
an increase in our production costs and  a corresponding decrease in our profitability.  We also have  a
vertically-integrated manufacturing process.  Each segment  is dependent upon  the prior process and any
breakdown in one segment will adversely  affect all later components. Fluctuations in our production
process may affect our ability to deliver products to our customers on a timely basis. Our inability to
meet our delivery obligations could result in a loss of our customers and  negatively affect our  business,
financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we have an ongoing manufacturing restructuring program to reduce  our manufacturing

costs. If our planned manufacturing plant consolidations in the United States,  Europe  and China are
not successful, our results of operations  and  financial condition could be materially adversely  affected.

If we continue to experience declines in  demand, we will further reduce our  production  levels, resulting  in
lower capacity utilization that could negatively impact our  results of  operations.

In response to the current recessionary pressures and reduced order volumes, we  have decreased

our  production levels to conserve cash. If  we continue to experience declines in  orders  from customers,
we will take further steps to reduce our  production levels to avoid  building inventory and  increasing
our  working capital levels. While this  step helps to preserve cash, a large  amount of our production
costs are fixed and therefore will negatively impact our ability to absorb  these costs, resulting in lower
gross  margins for the products manufactured. Although we are expecting a certain level of decreased
production volume in 2009, there can  be  no  assurances that additional steps will not be required  to
reduce these levels further thereby decreasing our results from operations.

If we experience delays in introducing new  products or if  our existing or  new products do not achieve or
maintain market acceptance and regulatory  approvals, our revenues  and our  profitability  may decrease.

Our failure to develop new and innovative products  or to custom design  existing products could

result in the loss of existing customers  to  competitors or  the inability to attract new business, either of
which  may adversely affect our revenues. Our industry is characterized by:

(cid:129) intense competition;

(cid:129) changes in specifications required  by our customers, plumbing codes and/or  regulatory agencies;

(cid:129) changes in requirements under new legislation;

18

(cid:129) technically complex products; and

(cid:129) constant improvement to existing products and introductions of new  products.

We  believe our future success will depend, in  part, on our ability to anticipate or  adapt to these

factors and to offer, on a timely basis,  products that meet customer demands and the requirements of
plumbing codes and/or regulatory agencies.  The  development of new  or enhanced products is  a
complex and uncertain process requiring the  anticipation  of  technological and market  trends. We may
experience design, manufacturing, marketing or other difficulties,  such as an inability  to  attract a
sufficient number of experienced engineers, that could delay or prevent  our development, introduction,
approval or marketing of new products or enhancements  and result in unexpected  expenses. Such
difficulties could cause us to lose business from our  customers and could adversely affect our
competitive position; in addition, added expenses could decrease the profitability associated  with those
products that do not gain market acceptance. Additionally, we  recently developed lead free  versions of
many  of our plumbing products to comply with new lead content  standards going  into  effect  in
California and Vermont. If our lead free products  fail to comply with these new  standards or if we
encounter difficulties in the manufacturing  processes for these products,  we could lose a substantial
amount of business from customers in California and Vermont and any  other  states that adopt similar
standards in the future.

Environmental compliance costs and liabilities could increase our expenses  or reduce our profitability.

Our operations and properties are subject to extensive and increasingly  stringent  laws  and

regulations relating to environmental protection, including laws and  regulations  governing air  emissions,
water discharges, waste management  and disposal and workplace safety. Such laws and regulations  can
impose substantial fines and sanctions for violations and  require the installation of costly pollution
control equipment or operational changes to limit pollution  emissions  and/or decrease the  likelihood of
accidental hazardous substance releases.  We could be required to halt  one  or more portions  of  our
operations until a violation is cured. We could  also be liable for the costs  of  property damage  or
personal injury to others. Although we  attempt to operate in compliance with these environmental laws,
we may not succeed in this effort at all  times. The costs  of curing violations  or resolving enforcement
actions that might be initiated by government authorities could  be  substantial.

Under certain environmental laws, the  current and past owners or operators of real property may

be liable for the costs of cleaning up  contamination, even if they did not know of or were not
responsible for such contamination. These laws also  impose liability on any person  who arranges for the
disposal or treatment of hazardous waste at any site. We have been named  as a potentially responsible
party or are otherwise conducting remedial activities  with respect  to  a  limited number  of  identified
contaminated sites, including sites we  currently own or  operate. There can be no assurances that our
ownership and operation of real property and our disposal  of  waste will  not  lead  to  other liabilities
under these laws.

We  have incurred,  and expect to continue to incur, costs relating to environmental matters.  In
addition, new laws and regulations, stricter enforcement  of  existing laws  and regulations, the discovery
of previously unknown contamination or  the imposition  of new clean-up requirements could require us
to incur additional costs or become the  basis  for new or  increased  liabilities that could be significant.
Environmental litigation, enforcement  and compliance are inherently uncertain and we may  experience
significant costs in connection with environmental matters. For more information, see ‘‘Item 1.
Business—Product Liability, Environmental  and  Other  Litigation Matters.’’

Third parties may infringe our intellectual  property  and  we may expend resources enforcing our rights or
suffer competitive injury.

We  rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, confidentiality
provisions and licensing arrangements to establish and protect our proprietary rights.  We may be
required to spend resources to monitor  and  police  our  intellectual property rights. If we fail  to

19

successfully enforce our intellectual property rights, our competitive position could suffer, which  could
harm our operating results. We have  been  limited  from selling  products from time-to-time  because of
existing patents.

The requirements of Financial Accounting  Standards Board  Statement No.  142, ‘‘Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets’’ (FAS 142) may result in  a write-off of all or a portion  of our  goodwill and non-amortizable
intangible assets, which would negatively  affect  our operating  results and  financial condition.

As of December 31, 2008, we recorded goodwill  and  non-amortizable  intangible assets of

$431.3 million and $62.0 million, respectively.  In lieu of amortization, we are required to perform an
annual impairment review of both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets. In 2008, in
performing our annual goodwill review,  we recognized a non-cash pre-tax charge of approximately
$22.0 million as an impairment of all  the goodwill value related to one reporting unit.  Although we did
not experience goodwill impairment  in  our remaining reporting units,  there can be no  assurances that
future goodwill impairment will not occur. We perform our annual test for indications of goodwill and
non-amortizable intangible assets impairment  in the fourth quarter of  our fiscal year or  sooner  if
indicators of impairment exist.

The loss or financial instability of a major  customer could  have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

In 2008, our top ten customers accounted  for approximately 20% of our  total net sales with  no one

customer accounting for more than approximately 5%  of our  total net sales. Our customers  generally
are not obligated to purchase any minimum volume of products from us and are able to terminate their
relationships with us at any time. In addition, increases in the prices of  our  products could result in a
reduction in orders for our customers. A significant  reduction in  orders  from, or change in terms of
contracts with, any significant customers could have a material adverse effect on our future  results of
operations. Furthermore, some of our major  customers are facing financial challenges  due  to  market
declines and heavy debt levels; should  these challenges  become acute, our results could be materially
adversely affected due to reduced orders and/or payment  delays or defaults.

Certain indebtedness may limit our ability to pay dividends, incur additional debt and make acquisitions  and
other investments.

Our revolving credit facility and other  senior indebtedness contain operational and financial

covenants that restrict our ability to make  distributions to stockholders, incur additional debt  and make
acquisitions and other investments unless  we satisfy certain financial tests and comply  with various
financial ratios. If we do not maintain compliance with these  covenants,  our creditors could declare  a
default under our revolving credit facility or senior  notes and  our indebtedness could be declared
immediately due and payable. Our ability to comply with the provisions of our indebtedness may  be
affected by changes in economic or business  conditions beyond our control. Further, given  the current
condition of the credit markets, should we  require additional debt financing  above our existing  credit
limit, we cannot be assured such financing would  be  available  to  us or available to us on reasonable
economic terms.

Investments in auction rate securities and  rights issued by  UBS  are subject to risks which may  cause losses
and affect the liquidity of these investments.

At December 31, 2008, we held $6.0  million in auction rate  securities (ARS)  at fair  value whose

underlying investments are AA rated  municipal bonds and student  loans and $2.3 million in  rights
issued by UBS, AG (UBS). All of our  ARS were sold by UBS. In the  fourth quarter of  2008, UBS
issued a settlement offer to the holder of certain ARS  including all  of  the securities held  by  us. Under
the terms of the settlement offer, UBS issued non-transferable  rights entitling  the holder to sell the
underlying ARS at par to UBS at any  time during  the period June 30, 2010 through July 2,  2012, after
which  time the rights expire. UBS could elect at any time from  the  settlement through the  expiration of
the settlement agreement to purchase the ARS, in which case UBS  would be required to pay par  value

20

for the ARS. The value of the ARS and the related rights from UBS are subject to the  credit risk of
the underlying agencies which originally issued  the bonds as  well as  the  credit risk of UBS. If UBS is
unable to perform under the terms of the rights  agreements,  we  could incur  losses to liquidate the
remaining securities or hold the securities to maturity.

One of our stockholders can exercise substantial influence over our Company.

As of February 1, 2009, Timothy P. Horne, a member  of our board of directors,  beneficially owned
approximately 19.8% of our outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock (assuming  conversion  of all
shares of Class B Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Horne  into  Class A Common Stock) and
approximately 99.0% of our outstanding shares of Class B  Common  Stock, which  represents
approximately 70.7% of the total outstanding voting  power. As long as Mr. Horne controls shares
representing at least a majority of the total voting  power of our outstanding stock, Mr. Horne will be
able to unilaterally determine the outcome of most stockholder  votes, and  other stockholders will  not
be able to affect the outcome of any such votes.

Conversion and sale of a significant number of shares of our  Class B Common Stock could adversely affect
the market price of our Class A Common Stock.

As of February 1, 2009, there were outstanding 29,251,739 shares of our Class A  Common Stock

and 7,293,880 shares of our Class B Common Stock. Shares of  our Class B  Common Stock  may be
converted into Class A Common Stock at any time on  a one for one basis. Under  the terms of  a
registration rights agreement with respect to outstanding shares  of our Class B Common Stock, the
holders  of our Class B Common Stock have rights with respect to the registration of the  underlying
Class A Common Stock. Under these registration  rights, the  holders of Class B Common Stock may
require, on up to two occasions, that  we register their shares for public resale. If we are eligible to use
Form S-3 or a similar short-form registration  statement,  the holders of Class B Common  Stock may
require that we register their shares for public resale up  to  two  times per year. If we elect to register
any shares of Class A Common Stock for any public offering, the holders of  Class B  Common Stock
are entitled to include shares of Class A Common Stock  into  which such shares of  Class B  Common
Stock may be converted in such registration.  However,  we  may  reduce the number of shares proposed
to be registered in view of market conditions. We will pay all expenses  in connection  with any
registration, other than underwriting discounts and commissions. If all of  the available registered shares
are sold  into the public market the trading price  of our Class A Common Stock could decline.

Our Class A Common Stock has insignificant voting power.

Our Class B Common Stock entitles its holders to ten  votes for  each share  and our Class A

Common Stock entitles its holders to  one vote per share. As of February 1, 2009, our Class B Common
Stock constituted 20.0% of our total  outstanding common stock and 71.4%  of  the total outstanding
voting power and thus is able to exercise a controlling influence over  our  business.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

21

Item 2. PROPERTIES.

As of December 31, 2008, we maintained approximately 74 facilities  worldwide, including our

corporate headquarters located in North Andover,  Massachusetts.  The  remaining  facilities  consist of
foundries, manufacturing facilities, warehouses, sales  offices and distribution  centers. The  principal
properties in each of our three geographic segments and their location, principal  use and ownership
status are set forth below:

North America:

Location

Principal Use

Owned/Leased

North Andover, MA . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate Headquarters
Export, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Franklin, NH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing/Distribution
Burlington, ON, Canada . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing/Distribution
Kansas City, KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Fort Myers, FL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
St. Pauls, NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Spindale, NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing/Distribution
Chesnee, SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Dunnellon, FL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse
San Antonio, TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse
Springfield, MO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing/Distribution
Langley, BC, Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Houston, TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Brea, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Phoenix, AZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse
Kansas City, KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distribution Center
Reno, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distribution Center
Vernon, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distribution Center
Calgary, AB, Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distribution Center

Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased

Europe:

Location

Principal Use

Owned/Leased

Eerbeek, Netherlands . . . . . . . . . . . . European Headquarters/

Owned

Manufacturing
Biassono, Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Brescia, Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Landau, Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Fresseneville, France . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Hautvillers, France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Plovdiv, Bulgaria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Ammanford, United Kingdom . . . . . . Manufacturing
Vildjberg, Denmark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Rosi`eres, France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Monastir, Tunisia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Gardolo, Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Sorgues, France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Grenoble, France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Vojens,  Denmark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse

Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased

22

China:

Location

Principal Use

Owned/Leased

Shanghai, China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asian Headquarters
Tianjin Tanggu District, THMT, China Manufacturing
Taizhou, Yuhuan, China . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Hunan, Changsha, China . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Ningbo, Beilun, China . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing
Ningbo, Beilun Port, China . . . . . . . . Distribution Center

Leased
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased

Certain of our facilities are subject to mortgages and collateral assignments under loan agreements

with long-term lenders. In general, we believe  that our properties, including machinery,  tools and
equipment, are in good condition, well  maintained  and  adequate and  suitable  for their intended uses.
Many of our manufacturing plants, especially in North America and  China, are  currently operating at
levels that our management considers  below normal capacity due to the  current worldwide recession.
As part of its continuous manufacturing  footprint review, in 2009,  management will execute a  plan to
further consolidate its North America  and  Chinese  operations. See Recent  Developments in Item 7,
‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial  Condition and Results  of  Operations,’’ for more
details.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We  are from time to time involved in various legal and administrative procedures. See  Item 1,
‘‘Business—Product Liability, Environmental  and  Other  Litigation Matters,’’ which  is incorporated
herein by reference.

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY  HOLDERS.

There were no matters submitted during  the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this

Annual Report to a vote of security holders through solicitation  of  proxies or  otherwise.

23

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON  EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER  MATTERS

AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY  SECURITIES.

The following table sets forth the high and  low sales prices of our Class A Common  Stock on  the

New York Stock Exchange during 2008  and  2007 and cash dividends paid per share.

First  Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

High

$30.75
31.00
33.00
29.90

2008

Low

$24.02
24.17
21.89
16.67

Dividend

High

$0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11

$46.71
41.34
39.96
33.09

2007

Low

$35.05
36.10
30.40
25.40

Dividend

$0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10

There is  no established public trading market for our Class  B Common Stock,  which is  held

exclusively by members of the Horne family.  The principal  holders of such stock  are subject to
restrictions on transfer with respect to  their  shares. Each share of our Class B  Common Stock (10 votes
per  share) is convertible into one share of  Class A Common  Stock (1 vote per share).

Aggregate common stock dividend payments for 2008 and  2007 were $16.2  million and

$15.6 million, respectively. While we presently intend  to  continue to pay cash dividends, the payment of
future cash dividends depends upon the Board of Directors’ assessment  of  our  earnings, financial
condition, capital requirements and other factors.

The number of record holders of our Class A Common  Stock  as of February 22,  2009 was 166.

The number of record holders of our  Class B Common Stock as  of  February 22, 2009 was 7.

We  satisfy the minimum withholding tax obligation due upon the  vesting  of  shares of restricted

stock and the conversion of restricted stock units  into shares of Class A Common Stock by
automatically withholding from the shares being issued  a number of shares with an  aggregate fair
market value on the date of such vesting  or  conversion  that would satisfy the  withholding amount due.

We  did  not withhold any Class A Common Stock for  withholding tax obligations  during  the quarter

ended December 31, 2008.

The following table includes information  with respect to repurchases  we made of our Class  A

Common Stock during the quarter ended  December  31, 2008.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period

(a) Total
Number of
Shares (or
Units)

(c) Total Number of
Shares  (or Units)

(d) Maximum Number  (or
Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares  (or

(b) Average

Price Paid per Publicly Announced
Purchased Share (or Unit) Plans or Programs(1)

Purchased  as Part  of Units) that May Yet  Be
Purchased  Under the
Plans or Programs(1)

September 29, 2008 - October 26, 2008 . —
October 27, 2008 - November 23, 2008 . . —
November  24, 2008 - December 31, 2008 . —

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —

—
—
—

—

—
—
—

—

553,615
553,615
553,615

553,615

(1) On November 9, 2007, we announced that our Board of Directors had  authorized a  stock

repurchase program. Under the program, we  may repurchase  up to an aggregate of  3.0 million
shares of our Class A Common Stock in open market purchases or in privately negotiated
transactions. On October 28, 2008, the Company announced that  it had temporarily suspended its
stock repurchase program. No shares were  repurchased during the quarter ended December 31,
2008. As of December 31, 2008, we had repurchased 2.45 million  shares of stock  for a  total  cost of
$68.1 million.

24

Performance Graph

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total shareholder  return  on our Class A

Common Stock for the last five years  with the cumulative  return of companies  on the  Standard &
Poor’s 500 Stock Index and the Russell 2000 Index. We chose the Russell  2000 Index because  it
represents companies with a market  capitalization  similar to that of Watts.  The graph assumes that the
value of the investment in our Class A Common Stock  and each  index was $100  at December 31, 2003
and that all dividends were reinvested.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Watts Water Technologies, Inc., The S&P 500  Index
and The Russell 2000 Index

$250

$200

$150

$100

$50

$0

12/03

12/04

12/05

12/06

12/07

12/08

Watts Water Technologies, Inc.

S&P 500

Russell 2000
24FEB200911584944

*

$100 invested on December 31, 2003 in stock  or index,  including reinvestment  of dividends. Fiscal
year ending December 31.

Cumulative Total Return

12/31/03

12/31/04

12/31/05

12/31/06

12/31/07

12/31/08

Watts Water Technologies, Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S&P 500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Russell 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100.00
100.00
100.00

146.82
110.88
118.33

139.36
116.33
123.72

191.03
134.70
146.44

140.11
142.10
144.15

119.52
89.53
95.44

The above Performance Graph and related information shall  not be  deemed  ‘‘soliciting material’’ or to

be ‘‘filed’’ with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be  incorporated by
reference into any future filing under the  Securities Act of 1933  or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as
amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it  by reference into such filing.

25

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The selected financial data set forth  below should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements, related Notes thereto and ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations’’  included herein.

FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY

(Amounts in millions, except per share  and cash dividend information)

Statement of operations data:
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income per share  from continuing

operations—diluted . . . . . . . . . .

1.28

Loss per share from discontinued

operations—diluted . . . . . . . . . .
Net income per share—diluted . . . .
Cash dividends declared per

(0.02)
1.26

Year Ended

Year Ended

12/31/08(1)(8) 12/31/07(2)(8)

Year  Ended
12/31/06(3)(8)

Year Ended

Year Ended

12/31/05(4)(5)(8) 12/31/04(6)(7)(8)

$1,459.4
47.3

$1,382.3
77.6

$1,230.8
77.1

$ 924.3
55.0

$824.6
48.7

(0.7)
46.6

(0.2)
77.4

1.99

(0.01)
1.99

(3.4)
73.7

2.29

(0.10)
2.19

(0.4)
54.6

1.67

(0.01)
1.66

(1.9)
46.8

1.49

(0.06)
1.43

common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

0.44

$

0.40

$

0.36

$

0.32

$ 0.28

Balance sheet data (at year end):
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt, net of current

$1,660.1

$1,729.3

$1,660.9

$1,101.0

$922.7

portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 409.8

$ 432.2

$ 441.7

$ 293.4

$180.6

(1) For the year ended December 31, 2008,  net income includes the following net  pre-tax costs:
goodwill impairment, severance costs,  asset write-downs and  other costs in North America of
$22.0 million, $2.6 million, $0.4 million and $1.5  million respectively; accelerated depreciation and
other costs in China of $1.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively and minority interest income of
$0.2 million; severance costs in Europe  of $0.2 million. The after-tax cost of  these items was
$21.2 million.

(2) For the year ended December 31, 2007,  net income includes the following net  pre-tax costs: change

in estimate of workers’ compensation costs  of  $2.9 million, severance and product line
discontinuance costs in North America of  $0.4 million  and $3.1  million,  respectively; accelerated
depreciation and asset write-downs, product line discontinuance costs and severance costs in China
of $2.9 million, $0.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and minority interest income of
$0.9 million. The after-tax cost of these items was $6.9 million.

(3) For the year ended December 31, 2006,  net income includes the following net  pre-tax gain: gain on
sales of buildings of $8.2 million, restructuring costs  consisting primarily of European severance of
$2.2 million and amortization of $0.4  million, other costs consisting  of  accelerated  depreciation and
severance in our Chinese joint venture of $4.7  million  and  minority interest income of $1.5 million.
The after-tax gain of these items was  $1.5 million.

(4) For the year ended December 31, 2005,  net income includes the following pre-tax  costs:

restructuring of $0.7 million and other costs consisting of accelerated depreciation and asset write-
downs of $1.8 million. The after-tax cost of these items was $1.6  million.

26

(5) For the year ended December 31, 2005,  net income includes a net after-tax charge of $0.9  million
for a selling, general and administrative  expense charge of  $1.5 million  related to a contingent
earn-out agreement.

(6) For the year ended December 31, 2004,  net income includes a net after-tax charge of $2.3  million
for certain accrued expense adjustments,  which are included in selling,  general and administrative
expense after-tax charges of $3.5 million related  to  a contingent earn-out agreement and
$0.7 million for various accrual adjustments and $0.5  million recorded  as an income tax benefit.

(7) For the year ended December 31, 2004,  net income includes the following pre-tax  costs:

restructuring of $0.1 million and other costs consisting of accelerated depreciation of $2.9 million.
The after-tax cost of these items was $1.8 million.

(8) In December 2004, we decided to divest  our  interest  in our  minority-owned subsidiary, Jameco

International, LLC (Jameco LLC). We recorded in  discontinued operation a net of tax impairment
charge  of $0.7 million for the year ended December 31,  2004. Also included in discontinued
operations is the net of tax operating results of Jameco LLC of $0.1  million of  loss and
$0.1 million of income for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In September
1996, we divested our Municipal Water  Group of businesses, which included Henry Pratt, James
Jones Company and Edward Barber  and Company Ltd.  Costs and  expenses  related to the
Municipal Water Group, for 2008, 2007,  2006, 2005 and 2004 relate  to  legal and settlement  costs
associated with the James Jones Litigation.  The  loss, net  of taxes, consists of $ 0.7  million,
$0.2 million, $3.4 million, $0.4 million and $1.1  million for the years ended  December 31, 2008,
2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

27

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Overview

We  are a leading supplier of products  for use in  the water quality, water safety, water  flow control

and water conservation markets in both  North America and Europe with  an expanding presence in
Asia. For over 130 years, we have designed and manufactured products  that  promote the comfort and
safety of people and the quality and conservation of water used in commercial  and residential
applications. We earn revenue and income  almost exclusively  from  the sale  of our  products. Our
principal product lines include:

(cid:129) water quality products, including backflow preventers and check valves  for  preventing reverse

flow within water lines and fire protection systems and point-of-use water  filtration and  reverse
osmosis systems for both commercial and  residential  applications;

(cid:129) a wide range of water pressure regulators for  both  commercial and residential  applications;

(cid:129) drainage products for industrial, commercial,  marine  and residential applications;

(cid:129) water supply products for commercial and residential applications;

(cid:129) temperature and pressure relief valves for water  heaters, boilers  and associated systems;

(cid:129) thermostatic mixing valves for tempering  water in  commercial and residential applications;

(cid:129) systems for under-floor radiant applications and hydraulic pump groups for  gas boiler

manufacturers and renewable energy applications, including solar and heat pump  control
packages;

(cid:129) flexible stainless steel connectors for  natural  and liquid  propane gas  in commercial food service

and residential applications; and

(cid:129) large  diameter butterfly valves for  use in  China’s  water infrastructure.

Our business is reported in three geographic segments,  North  America, Europe and  China. We
distribute our products through three primary distribution channels, wholesale, do-it-yourself (DIY) and
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). Interest  rates  have an indirect effect on the demand for our
products due to the effect such rates  have  on the  number of new residential and  commercial
construction starts and remodeling projects. All  three of these activities  have an impact on  our  sales
and earnings. An additional factor that  has had an effect on our sales is fluctuation  in foreign
currencies, as a portion of our sales and  certain portions  of  our costs, assets  and liabilities are
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.

We  believe that the factors relating to our future growth include our ability  to  continue to make
selective acquisitions, both in our core  markets as well as in new  complementary markets, regulatory
requirements relating to the quality and  conservation of water, increased demand for clean water with
continued enforcement of plumbing and building  codes  and  a  healthy economic environment.  We have
completed 32 acquisitions since divesting our industrial and oil and  gas business in  1999. Our
acquisition strategy focuses on businesses that  manufacture preferred  brand name products that address
our  themes of water quality, water conservation, water safety and water  flow control  and related
complementary markets. We target businesses  that will  provide us  with one  or more of the following:
an entry into new markets, an increase  in shelf space  with existing  customers, a  new or  improved
technology or an expansion of the breadth  of  our  water quality, water conservation, water safety  and
water flow control products for the residential and commercial  markets. In 2008 and 2007, sales from
acquisitions contributed approximately 4.6% and  3.9%, to our total sales growth over  the prior year.

Products representing a majority of our sales are subject  to  regulatory standards and  code

enforcement, which typically require  that  these products  meet stringent performance criteria.  Together
with our commissioned manufacturers’  representatives, we have consistently advocated for the

28

development and enforcement of such  plumbing codes. We are focused  on maintaining stringent  quality
control and testing procedures at each  of our manufacturing facilities  in order  to  manufacture products
in compliance with code requirements and take  advantage of the resulting  demand for  compliant
products. We believe that the product  development, product  testing capability and  investment in plant
and equipment needed to manufacture products in compliance with code requirements,  represent a
barrier to entry for competitors. We believe that, over the long term, there is  an increasing demand
among consumers for products to ensure  water quality,  which creates growth  opportunities for our
products.

Adverse economic developments in 2008 created a  challenging  environment for us. The credit
crisis and recessionary pressures negatively  impacted the  primary  markets we serve. We took steps
during the year to reduce costs and conserve cash. During the fourth quarter of 2008,  we reduced our
workforce by 10%  in the U.S. This step is  expected to save us  approximately  $10.0 million to
$11.0 million per year. In addition to  the reduction in force,  we took several  steps  to  help conserve
cash into 2009, including suspending  our stock repurchase program, first freezing U.S. wages and
salaries and later implementing salary  reductions, controlling  capital  spending levels  and continuing to
focus on working capital levels. We also announced a further operational  restructuring program  to
consolidate our manufacturing footprint in North  America and  China. We will continue  to  evaluate
acquisition candidates during 2009, but  we  expect funds  to  be  spent on acquisitions will be less than
that spent in 2008. We are enhancing  our focus on productivity  and continuous  improvement, and on
managing our working capital levels  as well as positioning many of our products to benefit when the
market returns. We believe that we are  well positioned to weather  the current  economic crisis due to
our  ability to continue to generate positive cash  flows  and control spending levels. We are not faced
with any major liquidity events until 2010,  at which time  $50.0 million of  our debt will  come  due.

We  require substantial amounts of raw materials to produce our products,  including bronze, brass,

cast iron, steel and plastic, and substantially all of the raw materials we require are purchased from
outside sources. We have experienced  volatility in  the costs of certain raw  materials,  particularly copper.
Bronze  and brass are copper-based alloys. During the fourth quarter of 2008, prices of copper  dropped
from highs experienced less than nine  months earlier.

A risk we face is our ability to deal effectively with changes in raw material costs. We  manage this

risk by monitoring related market prices, working  with our suppliers to achieve  the maximum level of
stability in their costs and related pricing, seeking  alternative  supply sources when  necessary,
implementing cost reduction programs and passing increases in costs  to  our  customers. Additionally
from time to time we may use commodity futures contracts on a limited basis  to  manage this  risk. We
are not able to predict whether or for  how long  this  volatility  will continue. If costs continue  to
decrease, we may experience pressure from customers to reduce  product pricing. We are unable to
predict the timing and impact that these  pricing decreases  could have  to  our  profit margins.

Another risk we face in all areas of our business is  competition. We  consider brand preference,
engineering specifications, code requirements, price,  technological expertise,  delivery times and  breadth
of product offerings to be the primary  competitive factors.  As mentioned previously, we  believe that the
product  development, product testing  capability and investment  in plant and equipment needed to
manufacture products in compliance  with code requirements, represent a barrier to entry  for
competitors. We are committed to maintaining our capital equipment  at  a  level consistent with current
technologies, and thus we spent approximately $26.6 million in 2008 and $37.8 million in 2007.

Recent  Developments

On February 10, 2009, a plan was approved  by the  Board of Directors to expand our program  to

consolidate our manufacturing footprint in North  America and  China. The plan  provides for  the
closure of three plants, with the relocation  of those  operations  to  existing facilities in either  North
America or China or to a new central  facility in the United  States.

29

The footprint consolidation pre-tax charge will be approximately $11.7  million,  including severance

charges of approximately $3.2 million, relocation costs of approximately $3.3 million and asset write-
downs of approximately $5.2 million. We also expect to record a net gain on property  sales  of
$2.4 million. One-time tax charges of approximately $7.0  million regarding the  payback of prior tax
holiday benefits are also expected to be incurred as  part  of the  building relocations.  Approximately 400
positions will be eliminated in connection with this consolidation.  The net after tax charge for  this
manufacturing consolidation program  is  expected to be approximately $14.9 million  ($4.4  million  non
cash), with costs being incurred through December 2009. We  expect to spend approximately
$4.8 million in capital expenditures to  consolidate operations. We expect this  entire project will be
self-funded through net proceeds from the  sale of buildings and  other assets being disposed of as part
of the plan.

On February 9, 2009, we declared a quarterly dividend of eleven  cents  ($0.11) per share  on each

outstanding share of Class A Common  Stock  and Class B Common Stock.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007

Net Sales. Our business is reported in three geographic segments:  North America, Europe and

China. Our net sales in each of these  segments for  the years  ended December  31, 2008 and 2007 were
as follows:

Year Ended
December 31, 2008

Year Ended
December 31, 2007

Net Sales

% Sales

Net Sales

% Sales

Change

(Dollars in millions)

North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 866.2
546.0
47.2

59.4% $ 871.0
37.4
452.6
3.2
58.7

63.0% $ (4.8)
93.4
32.7
(11.5)
4.3

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,459.4

100.0% $1,382.3

100.0% $ 77.1

The change in net sales is attributable  to  the following:

Change  to
Consolidated
Net  Sales

(0.4)%
6.8
(0.8)

5.6%

North

North

North

America Europe China

Total

America Europe China

Total America Europe China

Change As a % of
Consolidated Net Sales

Change As a % of
Segment Net  Sales

Organic growth . . . $(18.2) $11.3 $(12.1) $(19.0)
3.8
0.5
Foreign exchange . .
35.6
— 63.7
12.9
Acquisitions . . . . . .
—
Disposal . . . . . . . . .

— (3.2)

31.3
50.8

—
0.9
(3.2) —

(Dollars in millions)
(1.3)% 0.8% (0.9)% (1.4)% (2.1)% 2.5% (20.6)%

2.3
3.7
— (0.2)

0.3
2.6
— 4.6

—
1.5
(0.2) —

6.9
11.2

6.5
—
— (5.5)

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . $ (4.8) $93.4 $(11.5)$ 77.1

(0.4)% 6.8% (0.8)% 5.6% (0.6)% 20.6% (19.6)%

Organic net sales for 2008 decreased  in North America primarily due  to  decreased  sales in the

wholesale market, where sales were 2.5% lower  than in  2007.  Unit sale declines, due in  large part  to
the soft economy, were widespread across  a number  of  product lines, with our backflow product line
impacted the most. Organic sales in our  North American retail market for 2008 remained relatively flat
compared with 2007, decreasing 0.6%.  Unit sale reductions in  the retail  market  due  to  the soft
economy  were offset by selected price  increases and new  product rollouts. Given  the current recession
and more stringent bank lending standards, we believe that both the commercial  and residential
construction markets, which we sell into  through our wholesale and  DIY channels,  will continue to be
soft through 2009. As a result, we believe that our sales in North  America may decline in 2009. Growth

30

in North America due to acquisitions is  due  to  the inclusion  of sales  from Topway acquired in
November 2007.

Organic net sales for 2008 increased  in  Europe primarily  due to an 11.0% increase  in sales into
the European OEM market as compared to 2007.  OEM sales  were positively  impacted  in Germany
where  sales of our products into alternative energy and energy conservation  markets  were strong. Sales
into the wholesale market for 2008 decreased by 4.5% as compared to 2007  and were negatively
affected by declines in construction activity. Acquired sales  growth in Europe was due to the inclusion
of Bl¨ucher for seven months in 2008. We expect  sales  in Europe will increase on a constant currency
basis in 2009 as Bl¨ucher will be reported for a full year  and  we expect alternative energy  products sales
to grow, offset by unit declines in our core product lines. Core sales are expected to be impacted by the
widening recession in Europe.

Organic net sales for 2008 declined in China due to decreased  sales  in both the Chinese domestic

and export markets. China sales were  also negatively  affected  as compared to 2007  from the disposal  of
a commodity butterfly valve business during the fourth quarter of 2008.  This  decrease was partially
offset by an increase in sales of large diameter butterfly valves  to  our water infrastructure customers
during 2008.

The increases in net sales due to foreign exchange in  North America,  Europe and  China were
primarily due to the appreciation of the  Canadian dollar, euro  and yuan, respectively,  against the  U.S.
dollar. We cannot predict whether these  currencies will continue  to  appreciate against the U.S. dollar in
future periods or whether future foreign exchange rate  fluctuations will have a  positive or negative
impact on our net sales. Recent fluctuations in  foreign currency rates portend a reduction in those
currencies against the U.S. dollar.

Gross Profit. Gross profit and gross profit as a percent of  net sales (gross margin)  for 2008  and

2007 were as follows:

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended
December 31,

2008

2007

(dollars in millions)
$488.4
$461.6

Point
Change

33.5%

33.4% 0.1%

Gross margin improved by 10 basis points  to  33.5% in 2008 compared to 2007.  The improvement
was attributable primarily to margin improvements in North America and  Europe offset by declines in
China. North America’s margin improved 70 basis  points to 34.4%  primarily due to the  price increases
implemented to offset prior raw material  cost increases  and,  to  a  lesser extent, the mix of product sold.
Further, 2007 North American gross margins were negatively impacted by  approximately $6.5 million,
or approximately 100 basis points on  the prior  year  gross margin,  for charges associated with product
discontinuances and a change in estimate for workers’ compensation costs. Gross  margin in Europe
increased to 32.3% from 31.0% primarily due to our ability to leverage  additional volume  from
alternative energy product sales with better factory absorption  levels due  to the  rationalization efforts
made over the last two years in Italy. China gross  margin deteriorated when compared to 2007
primarily due to excess capacity due  to  sales  declines, value added tax increases, negative impact from
the increase in the value of the Chinese yuan against  the U.S. dollar and disruptions from  a plant move
and labor disputes.

During  2007, we initiated a global restructuring  program  that was approved by our Board of
Directors on October 30, 2007. The program includes  plans  to  shut down  five  manufacturing facilities,
right-size a sixth facility and incur costs  to  relocate  one  of our China facilities. In  addition,  we
performed an evaluation of certain product lines in  2007. After  completing this evaluation, we initiated
a plan to discontinue certain product  lines. In accordance  with the restructuring program  and product
line discontinuance commenced in 2007, we anticipated spending $12.9 million. To date, we have

31

incurred $8.9 million of costs associated  with the  plans and have successfully shut down  two
manufacturing facilities and right sized another facility. Management is reviewing the status of the
program and the timing of charges for the Europe segment. We anticipate the restructuring program
will not be completed until 2010, with the  expectation that  our Europe segment will incur most  of  its
costs during 2010. As such, previous estimates of savings from the  programs  will  likely be achieved in
2010 rather than in the second half of  2009.

The following table presents the total estimated pre-tax charges to be incurred for the global
restructuring program and product line discontinuances initiated in 2007 by our reportable  segments
and amounts charged to date:

Reportable Segment

North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

Spent
to Date

(in millions)
$5.8
0.2
2.9

$ 5.7
3.9
3.3

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$12.9

$8.9

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses,  or
SG&A expenses, for 2008 increased  $27.5  million, or  8.3%, compared to 2007. The increase in SG&A
expenses is attributable to the following:

Organic growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 3.2
7.7
17.8
(1.2)

$27.5

1.0%
2.3
5.4
(0.4)

8.3%

(in millions) % Change

The organic increase in SG&A expenses  was primarily due to increased  incentive compensation
costs and increased variable European  selling expenses due  to  increased sales  volumes partially offset
by decreased shipping costs and other variable North American  selling expenses due to decreased sales
volumes. The increase in SG&A expenses  from foreign exchange was primarily due to the  appreciation
of the euro, yuan and Canadian dollar  against the U.S. dollar. The increase in SG&A expenses from
acquisitions was due to the inclusion of  Bl¨ucher and Topway. Total SG&A expenses, as a  percentage of
sales, was 24.7% in 2008 compared to  24.1%  2007.

Restructuring and Other (Income) Charges.

In 2008, we recorded $5.6 million for severance, asset
write-downs and accelerated depreciation in North America, China and  Europe. In 2007,  we recorded
$3.2 million for asset write-downs, accelerated depreciation and severance in  North America  and China.

Goodwill Impairment Charge. The goodwill impairment charge in 2008 of approximately
$22.0 million related to one of our North  American reporting  units (Water  Quality). See Note 2 of
notes to consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report  on Form 10-K,  for additional
information regarding the impairment.

32

Operating Income. Operating income by geographic segment for  2008 and 2007 was as follows:

North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 67.8
65.7
(5.7)
(27.2)

$100.6

Years Ended

December 31,
2008

December 31,
2007

Change

% Change to
Consolidated
Operating
Income

(20.3)%
9.6
(10.8)
1.5

(Dollars in millions)
$ 93.3
53.6
7.9
(29.1)

$(25.5)
12.1
(13.6)
1.9

$125.7

$(25.1)

(20.0)%

The change in operating income is attributable to the following:

Change
As a % of Consolidated
Operating Income

Change
As a % of Segment
Operating  Income

North

North

North

America Europe China Corp. Total America Europe China Corp. Total America Europe China Corp.

$ (2.1)
—
(0.6)
—

$ 5.7
3.9
2.7
—

$(16.7) $1.9 $(11.2)
3.5
2.1
0.8

(0.4) —
— —
0.8 —

(1.6)% 4.5% (13.3)% 1.5% (8.9)% (2.3)% 10.6% (211.4)% 6.5%

—
(0.4)
—

3.1
2.1
—

(0.2)
—
0.6

—
—
—

2.9
1.7
0.6

—
(0.6)
—

7.3
5.0
—

(5.1) —
—
—

—
10.1

(Dollars in millions)

(22.8)

(0.2)

2.7 — (20.3)

(18.3)

(0.1)

2.1

— (16.3)

(24.4)

(0.4)

34.2

—

Organic growth . .
Foreign  exchange .
Acquisitions . . . .
Disposal
. . . . . .
Restructuring,

goodwill and
other . . . . . . .

Total . . . . . . . . .

$(25.5)

$12.1

$(13.6) $1.9 $(25.1)

(20.3)% 9.6% (10.8)% 1.5% (20.0)% (27.3)% 22.5% (172.2)% 6.5%

The decrease in consolidated organic operating  income was due primarily  to  underutilization of
capacity,  in both China and, to a lesser  extent, in North America caused by recessionary  unit volume
declines and one-off events in China  such as the  labor strike, a plant move and  natural disasters. Also,
SG&A expenses such as salaries, product liability and other  fixed  spending increased.  These items were
partially offset by higher sales and better  productivity in  Europe and reductions in certain SG&A
expenses such as shipping, pension costs  and  bad debts. Corporate costs decreased  as the result  of
lower benefit costs, including lower stock based compensation and reduced  costs from  our nonqualified
deferred compensation plan, and lower  costs  related to our  Sarbanes Oxley compliance  efforts and
reduced legal costs.

The Bl¨ucher acquisition accounts for the net increase in  operating  profits from acquisitions.

The net increase in operating income  from foreign exchange was  primarily due to the  appreciation

of the euro against the U.S. dollar. We  cannot predict whether  these currencies will continue to
appreciate against the U.S. dollar in  future periods or whether future  foreign  exchange rate fluctuations
will have a positive or negative impact on our operating  income.

Interest Income.

Interest income decreased $9.4 million, or 64.8%, in 2008 compared to 2007,

primarily due to cash used to fund the  Bl¨ucher acquisition and the stock buy-back program initiated in
November 2007, as well as, a lower interest rate environment in 2008  as compared  to  2007.

Interest Expense.

Interest expense decreased $0.7 million,  or 2.6% in  2008 compared  to  2007,

primarily due to lower outstanding balances on the  revolving credit facility partially offset  by  an
increase in the average variable rates charged on the revolving credit facility.

Other (Income) Expense. Other expense increased $6.8 million,  or 295.7%, in 2008 compared to
2007, primarily due to foreign currency transaction losses, losses on metal commodity transactions and
negative changes in asset valuation of  our nonqualified  deferred compensation plan. Foreign currency
transaction losses increased in China, Europe and Canada in  2008 as compared to 2007.

33

Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate for continuing operations increased  to 34.6% for  2008 from

31.8% for 2007. The main driver of the  increase was goodwill  impairment. A portion  of the goodwill
relates to stock acquisitions, which when  impaired is not tax deductible. Our European  effective rate
declined due to provision releases and favorable tax treatments  related to the Bl¨ucher acquisition
financing.

Income From Continuing Operations.

Income from continuing operations in 2008 decreased

$30.3 million, or 39.0%, to $47.3 million, or $1.28 per common  share, from  $77.6 million, or $1.99  per
common share, for 2007, in each case,  on  a diluted basis. Repurchased shares  had an  accretive impact
of $0.07 per common share in 2008. Income from continuing  operations included an  after-tax goodwill
impairment charge of $17.3 million, or  $0.47 per common  share  for  2008. Income from  continuing
operations for 2007 includes a tax refund of $1.9  million, or $0.05 per common share. Income from
continuing operations for 2008 and 2007  included costs, net  of tax,  from  our restructuring plan,
reduction-in-force and product line discontinuances of $3.9 million, or $0.10 per common share,  and
$5.1 million, or $0.13 per common share, respectively. The appreciation  of the euro, Chinese yuan and
Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar  resulted in  a positive impact  on  income  from continuing
operations of $0.07 per common share  for 2008  compared  to  the comparable period  last year. We
cannot predict whether the euro, Canadian dollar or  yuan will  appreciate or depreciate against the U.S.
dollar in future periods or whether future  foreign exchange  rate fluctuations will have a positive or
negative impact on our net income.

Loss  From Discontinued Operations. Loss from discontinued operations in 2008 and 2007 was

$0.7 million, or $0.02 per common share, and  $0.2 million, or $0.01 per common share, on  a diluted
basis for the comparable period. The losses for  2008 and 2007 were primarily attributable  to  increased
legal fees associated with the James Jones Litigation, as described in Part I, Item 1,  ‘‘Business-Product
Liability, Environmental and Other Litigation Matters.’’  The 2007  loss was partially offset by reserve
adjustments.

Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2006

Net Sales. Our net  sales in each of our three geographic segments for the years ended

December 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

Year Ended
December 31, 2007

Year Ended
December 31, 2006

Net Sales

% Sales

Net Sales

% Sales

Change

Change  to
Consolidated
Net Sales

(Dollars in millions)

North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 871.0
452.6
58.7

63.0% $ 821.3
367.5
32.7
42.0
4.3

66.7% $ 49.7
85.1
29.9
16.7
3.4

4.0%
6.9
1.4

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,382.3

100.0% $1,230.8

100.0% $151.5

12.3%

The increase in net sales is attributable to the following:

Change
As a % of Consolidated
Net Sales

Change
As a % of  Segment
Net Sales

North

North

North

America Europe China Total America Europe China Total America Europe China

(Dollars in millions)

Organic growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . $41.0
3.9
Foreign exchange . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.8
Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$13.7 $ 8.5 $ 63.2
40.4
2.4
47.9
5.8

34.1
37.3

3.3% 1.1% 0.7% 5.1% 5.0% 3.7% 20.3%
0.3
0.4

5.8
13.8

9.3
10.2

3.3
3.9

0.2
0.5

0.5
0.6

2.8
3.0

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $49.7

$85.1 $16.7 $151.5

4.0% 6.9% 1.4% 12.3% 6.1% 23.2% 39.9%

34

The organic growth in net sales in North America was primarily due to increased unit  selling
prices and increased unit sales of certain product lines into the wholesale market. Our sales into the
wholesale market in 2007, excluding the  sales from the  acquisition  of Calflex Manufacturing,  Inc.
(Calflex) and Topway, grew by 7.7% compared to 2006. This was primarily due to increased sales of our
backflow products. Our sales into the  North American DIY market in 2007  decreased  by  4.4%
compared to 2006 primarily due our  discontinuing  certain lower margin product  lines, partially offset by
price increases and new product rollouts.

The acquired growth in net sales in North America  was  due to the inclusion  of  net sales of Calflex,

acquired on June 2, 2006, and Topway,  acquired on November 9, 2007.

The organic sales growth in Europe was broad-based, especially in  Eastern  Europe  and in  the
OEM market, which was partially offset by a weak German market. Our  sales  into  the wholesale and
OEM markets in 2007, excluding the  sales from  the acquisitions of ATS Expansion Group  (ATS), Kim
Olofsson Safe Corporation (Kimsafe) and Black Teknigas, Limited (Teknigas), grew by 3.1%  and 4.4%,
respectively, compared to 2006.

The acquired growth in net sales in Europe was due to the  inclusion of  the  net sales of ATS,
acquired on May 19, 2006, Kimsafe, acquired  on June 7,  2006, and Teknigas, acquired on  August 14,
2006.

The organic sales growth in China was primarily due to increased export  sales to Europe,

increased sales into the domestic Chinese markets  and  the elimination  of the one-month reporting lag
in two of our Chinese entities.

The acquired growth in net sales in China was due to the inclusion of net  sales of  Changsha Valve

Works (Changsha), acquired on April  26,  2006.

The increases in net sales due to foreign exchange in  North America,  Europe and  China were
primarily due to the appreciation of the  Canadian dollar, euro  and yuan, respectively,  against the  U.S.
dollar.

Gross Profit. Gross profit and gross profit as a percent of  net sales (gross margin)  for 2007  and

2006 were as follows:

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended
December 31,

2007

2006

(dollars in millions)
$425.0
$461.6

Point
Change

33.4% 34.5% (1.1%)

Gross margin decreased in 2007 compared  to  2006 primarily due  to  increased material costs, the

write-off of inventory related to the discontinuance of  certain product  lines and an increase  in our
workers’ compensation reserve primarily due to a  change in estimate.  The North American margin  for
2007 was affected by a charge related to our discontinuance of certain product lines and  for cost
increases for copper-based alloys and stainless  steel products, which  exceeded realized sales price
increases for most of the year. The European margin  remained relatively flat primarily  due  to  higher
margins contributed by price increases that were offset by  increased  material  costs and a shift  in sales
to lower margin products primarily in the  OEM market. Our China  segment’s gross margin decreased
primarily due to higher material costs,  underutilized  capacity in certain  locations primarily due to the
relocation of our joint venture facility, a  charge related to our discontinuance of certain product lines,
value added tax increases and a shift in product mix.

35

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A expenses for 2007 increased $32.5 million, or

10.8%, compared to 2006. The increase in SG&A expenses is attributable to the following:

Organic growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(in millions) % Change

$13.1
7.9
11.5

$32.5

4.4%
2.6
3.8

10.8%

The organic increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due to increased  product liability costs,
increased stock-based compensation  costs  and increased variable selling  expenses due to increased sales
volumes partially offset by decreased incentive compensation costs. The increase in SG&A  expenses
from foreign exchange was primarily  due to the appreciation of the euro, Canadian dollar and the yuan
against the U.S. dollar. The increase  in  SG&A expenses  from acquisitions  was  due  to  the inclusion  of
Changsha, ATS, Calflex, Watts Valve  (Ningbo) Co, Ltd.  (Ningbo), Kimsafe, Teknigas and Topway. Total
SG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales, were 24.1% in  2007 compared  to 24.4% 2006.

Restructuring and Other (Income) Charges.

In 2007, we recorded $3.2 million for asset write-
downs, accelerated depreciation and  severance in North America and  China.  In  2006, we  recorded
income of $5.7 million primarily due  to a gain of approximately $8.2 million  related to the  sale of two
buildings in Italy partially offset by a charge of  $2.5 million primarily for severance costs related  to  our
European restructuring programs.

Operating Income. Operating income by geographic segment for 2007  and 2006 was as follows:

Years Ended

December 31,
2007

December 31,
2006

Change

% Change to
Consolidated
Operating
Income

North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 93.3
53.6
7.9
(29.1)

(Dollars in millions)
$ 98.5
50.0
7.2
(25.2)

$(5.2)
3.6
0.7
(3.9)

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$125.7

$130.5

$(4.8)

(4.0)%
2.8
0.5
(3.0)

(3.7)%

The change in operating income is attributable to the  following:

Change
As  a % of Consolidated
Operating Income

Change
As a  % of Segment
Operating Income

North

North

North

America Europe China Corp. Total America Europe China Corp. Total America Europe China

Corp.

(Dollars in millions)

Organic growth . . .
Foreign exchange . .
Acquisitions . . . . . .
.
Restructuring/other

$(1.3) $ 0.9
4.0
4.8
(6.1)

0.9
(1.3)
(3.5)

$(1.5) $(3.9) $(5.8)
0.4 — 5.3
0.8 — 4.3
1.0 — (8.6)

(1.0)% 0.7% (1.3)% (3.0)% (4.6)% (1.4)% 1.8% (20.8)% (15.5)%
0.7
(1.0)
(2.7)

4.1
—
—
3.3
— (6.5)

8.0
9.6
(12.2)

0.9
(1.3)
(3.5)

3.1
3.6
(4.6)

5.5
11.1
13.9

0.3
0.7
0.8

—
—
—

Total

. . . . . . . . . .

$(5.2) $ 3.6

$ 0.7 $(3.9) $(4.8)

(4.0)% 2.8% 0.5% (3.0)% (3.7)% (5.3)% 7.2% 9.7% (15.5)%

The decrease in organic operating income in  North  America was  primarily  due  to  increased
material costs partially offset by unit  price increases,  a net increase in  our  workers’ compensation
reserve  primarily due to a change in  estimate and increased product liability costs,  partially  offset by
decreased incentive compensation costs. In 2007,  we recorded a charge of $3.1  million  related to our
discontinuance of certain product lines  and $0.4 million for primarily  for  severance costs  related to our
global  restructuring program. 

36

The acquired decrease was primarily due to the amortization of certain costs  associated with the

acquisition of Topway.

Europe’s organic growth in operating  income was due  to  our  ability to leverage  SG&A expenses,
increased selling prices partially offset  by increased material costs  and a shift in  sales to lower margin
products primarily in the OEM market. In 2007,  we did  not  record  any costs associated  with
restructuring compared to a gain of $6.0  million  for the  same period  in 2006. We recorded a  gain of
$8.2 million for the building sales in  Italy partially offset by $2.2 million of primarily severance costs.

The acquired growth in Europe was due  to  the inclusion  of the operating  income  from ATS,

Kimsafe and Teknigas.

The decrease in organic operating income  in China was primarily attributable to decreased

production levels at our wholly owned manufacturing plants.  The acquired growth in  China was  due  to
the inclusion of the operating income of Changsha  and  Ningbo. In 2007,  we recorded  $3.3 million for
asset write-downs, accelerated depreciation  and severance related to our  global restructuring program
and $0.7 million related to our discontinuance  of certain product lines. The elimination  of  a one-month
reporting lag in two of our Chinese entities  did not have a material  impact on China’s operating
income.

The decrease in organic operating income  in Corporate was  primarily attributable to increased
stock-based compensation costs and legal costs, partially offset by  decreased  incentive compensation
costs.

The net increase in operating income  from foreign exchange was  primarily due to the  appreciation

of the euro, Canadian dollar and yuan  against  the U.S.  dollar.

Interest Income.

Interest income increased $9.5 million,  or 190.0%, in  2007  compared to 2006,
primarily due to the investment of the net proceeds  of  approximately  $219.0 million from the public
offering of 5.75 million shares of our Class  A Common Stock in November 2006.

Interest Expense.

Interest expense increased $4.8 million,  or 21.7%, in  2007 compared to 2006,

primarily due to our April 27, 2006 issuance  of  $225.0 million 5.85% senior notes  due  in 2016 and an
increase in the average variable rates charged on the revolving credit facility partially  offset by
decreased debt levels for acquisitions.

Effective July 1, 2005, we entered into an interest rate swap for  a notional amount of A25.0 million
outstanding on our revolving credit facility. We swapped an  adjustable  rate of three month EURIBOR
plus 0.6% for a fixed rate of 3.02%. We recorded  a reduction  to  interest  expense of approximately
$0.7 million to recognize the fair value of the swap for 2006. The swap was terminated  on October 3,
2006.

Other (Income) Expense. Other (income) expense increased $3.2 million, or  355.6% in  2007

compared to 2006, primarily due to currency movements and losses on forward currency contracts.
Foreign currency losses were recorded  in Europe, Canada and China in 2007, whereas foreign currency
gains were recorded in 2006.

Minority interest. Minority interest increased $1.0 million, or 55.6%,  for 2007 compared to 2006,

primarily due to the credit recorded  for  the 40% liability of our joint venture partner’s share in  the
recording of the $2.4 million TWT restructuring costs.

Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate for continuing operations  decreased  to 31.8% in 2007 from

33.6% in 2006. The decrease was primarily due to a  one-time benefit associated  with a refund of
withholding taxes in Italy and in 2006  the recording of  higher taxes on the sale of two buildings.  This
decrease was partially offset by the recording of  a $3.2 million valuation allowance on the  deferred tax
assets of our 60% owned Chinese joint venture.

Income From Continuing Operations.

Income from continuing operations in 2007 increased

$0.5 million, or 0.6%, to $77.6 million, or $1.99  per  common  share, from  $77.1 million, or $2.29 per

37

common share, for 2006, in each case,  on a  diluted basis.  Income from continuing operations for 2007
included a tax refund of $1.9 million,  or $0.05  per  common share. Income from continuing operations
for 2007 and 2006 included costs, net  of  tax,  from our restructuring plan and  product line
discontinuances of $5.1 million, or $0.13 per common share, and  included  income,  net of tax,  of
$1.5 million, or $0.04 per share, respectively. In 2006, the gains  on  the sales  of our  buildings in  Italy
resulted in an after-tax gain of $5.1 million, or $0.15  per  share. The appreciation  of the euro, Chinese
yuan and Canadian dollar against the  U.S. dollar resulted  in a positive impact on  income  from
continuing operations of $0.09 per common  share for 2007 compared  to  the comparable period last
year.

Additionally, in November 2006, the Company completed  a public offering of 5.75 million shares

of Class  A Common Stock and received net proceeds  of  approximately  $219.0 million. The interest
earned on the net proceeds provided  approximately  $7.1 million  in after-tax  income  in 2007. The
issuance of an additional 5.75 million  shares had a  dilutive impact on earnings  per  share of $0.11  per
share in 2007, after considering the interest income from  the net proceeds.

Loss  From Discontinued Operations. Loss from discontinued operations in 2007  and  2006 was

$0.2 million, or $0.01 per common share, and $3.4 million, or $0.10 per common share, on  a diluted
basis for the comparable period. The losses for 2007  and 2006 were primarily attributable  to  increased
deductible costs in 2006 and legal fees associated with  the James Jones Litigation, as described in
Part I, Item 1, ‘‘Business-Product Liability,  Environmental and Other Litigation Matters.’’ The 2007  loss
was partially offset by reserve adjustments.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We  believe that effectively managing  cash  is necessary given the  uncertainty in the current  credit
markets. To achieve our cash management goals  and manage any  potential downside liquidity  events,
we have taken steps to control spending,  increase productivity, reduce net  working capital  levels,
control capital expenditures and to spend  more  conservatively on acquisitions. With available cash of
$165.6 million at December 31, 2008,  available capacity on our line of credit as discussed below,
continued working capital management  focus, no large debt payments  due until 2010, and with
spending and cost-cutting programs in  place, we  believe that we are well positioned to transition
through what will be a challenging 2009. There are  two  recent negative  developments related to
inventory that could affect 2009 cash  flows. We  have recently experienced de-stocking  issues  within our
customer base, which delay our ability  to  sell inventory. Further, more of our customers  are adopting
just-in-time inventory techniques to minimize their inventory  investment, which puts pressure on our
plants to hold inventory to meet expected near-term customer  demand. Both these  developments could
affect our ability to reduce inventory levels during 2009 and, therefore could reduce our cash flows.
Also, we may have to consider external  sources  of financing for any  large future acquisitions.

In 2008, we generated $146.4 million of cash from operating activities as compared to $91.7 million

in 2007. With management’s enhanced focus in  2008 on  working capital management, net working
capital cash outflows have decreased  from $25.1  million  in 2007, to a net working  capital cash  inflow of
$43.4 million in 2008, a $68.5 million  positive  change. Better overall management of our inventory,
accounts receivable and accounts payable drove the improvement in working capital. This change was
offset to some extent by lower income from continuing operations.

We  used $172.2 million of net cash for investing activities in 2008.  We used approximately

$167.9 million of net cash to fund a current year acquisition and  spent  $9.3 million for  acquisition  costs
related to prior years acquisitions. We received proceeds of $33.3 million from  the sale  of  auction  rate
securities. We invested $26.6 million  in  capital equipment as  part  of  our ongoing commitment to
improve our manufacturing capabilities. We expect to invest  approximately  $27.0 in capital  equipment
in 2009.

As of December 31, 2008, we held $6.0 million in investments with an  auction  reset feature, or

auction rate securities. Since December  31, 2007, we have reduced  our exposure to auction rate

38

securities by $30.6  million. We recorded an impairment  of approximately  $2.4 million on  the remaining
securities in other expense in the Consolidated Statement  of Operations, as the decline in  fair value is
no longer considered to be temporary. At the time of purchase, all  the  auction  rate securities carried
an AAA credit rating. The auction rate securities we currently hold are all long-term debt obligations
secured by municipal bonds and student  loans, and carry an AA  or  better  credit rating.

Liquidity for these auction rate securities (ARS) is  typically  provided  by an auction  process,  which

allows holders to sell their notes, and resets  the applicable interest  rate  at pre-determined intervals,
usually every 7 to 35 days. Each of the auction rate  securities in  our investment portfolio as of
December 31, 2008 has experienced failed auctions. There is no assurance  that  future auctions for
these securities will succeed. During  the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company and  its broker  elected to
participate in a settlement offer by UBS  AG (UBS). Under  the terms  of  the settlement, the  Company
and its broker were issued rights by UBS.  Each right entitles  the holder to sell the underlying ARS at
par to UBS at any time during the period June 30, 2010,  through July 2,  2012. UBS could elect at  any
time from the settlement through the expiration of the settlement  agreement to purchase the ARS, in
which  case UBS would be required to pay par  value for  the ARS.  We have determined that the  rights
are a separate investment and have recorded the value of approximately $2.3 million in  other  income  in
our  Consolidated Statement of Operations. We have classified the investment in ARS  and the  UBS
rights as long-term investments as we  can not predict if UBS will  purchase  or sell  the ARS before the
earliest date at which we can require UBS to purchase the ARS  at par.

We  used $92.4 million of net cash from financing activities in 2008.  This was primarily due to
payments for our stock repurchase program, payments of debt  and dividend payments, partially offset
by increased borrowings under our line  of credit.

Our $350.0 million revolving credit facility with  a syndicate of banks is being used to support  our

acquisition program, working capital requirements and for  general  corporate purposes. Outstanding
indebtedness under the revolving credit  facility  bears interest at a rate determined by the type  of loan
plus an applicable margin determined by our  debt  rating, depending  on the  applicable base rate and
our  bond rating. For 2008, the average interest  rate  under the revolving credit facility for  euro-based
borrowings was approximately 5.2%.  There  were no U.S.  dollar borrowings  at December 31, 2008.  The
revolving credit facility includes operational and  financial covenants  customary for  facilities  of this  type,
including, among others, restrictions on  additional indebtedness, liens and investments and maintenance
of certain leverage ratios. As of December 31,  2008, we were in compliance  with all covenants related
to the revolving credit facility, had $260.0  million of unused and potentially  available credit under the
revolving credit facility and had $55.0  million of euro-based borrowings outstanding and $35.0 million
for stand-by letters of credit outstanding on our revolving  credit facility.

We  used $0.6 million of net cash from discontinued operations in  2008. We  paid approximately

$1.2 million for defense and other legal  costs  we incurred in  the James Jones Litigation. We  also
received $1.3 million for reimbursements  of defense costs.

Working capital (defined as current assets less current  liabilities) as  of December 31, 2008  was
$504.7 million compared to $667.0 million  as of December 31, 2007.  This decrease was primarily due to
decreases in cash and investment securities. Cash and cash equivalents decreased to $165.6 million as  of
December 31, 2008 compared to $290.3 million as of December 31,  2007 primarily due to funding of
acquisitions and for payments for our stock repurchase program. The ratio of current assets to current
liabilities was 2.7 to 1 as of December  31, 2008 compared to 3.3 to 1 as  of  December 31,  2007.

We  generated $91.7 million of cash from continuing operations in 2007.  We experienced  increases
in inventory in North America and China.  The  increases were primarily due to increased raw material
costs. There was also a decrease in accounts  payable, accrued  expenses and other liabilities, primarily in
Europe and North America. In Europe, accounts  payable declined  in 2007  due  to  a decline in
inventory. In North America, payments for  cash compensation increased in  2007. Also,  cash payments
to cover income tax obligations were greater during  2007. Accounts receivable decreased  in all three
segments.

39

We  used $87.4 million of net cash for  investing activities in 2007. We invested $37.8  million  in
capital equipment as part of our ongoing commitment to improve our manufacturing capabilities. We
invested $27.5 million in investment grade auction rate securities. We  used $18.1 million  to  fund  the
acquisitions of Topway. We paid $4.5 million for additional acquisition  costs related to prior years
acquisitions.

We  used $66.5 million of net cash from financing activities in 2007.  This was primarily due to
payments of debt, payments for our stock repurchase program and dividend  payments, partially offset
by increased borrowings under our line  of credit and tax  benefits from the exercise of stock awards.

We  generated $0.1 million of net cash from discontinued operations in 2007. We paid

approximately $0.5 million for defense  costs and  approximately  $0.5 million for  other  legal costs we
incurred in the James Jones Litigation.  We also  received $1.0 million for  indemnity payments.

We  generated $83.0 million of cash from continuing operations for 2006. We  experienced an
increase in inventory and accounts receivable in North  America, Europe and China.  The  increase in
accounts receivable of $17.0 million was  primarily due to increased  sales volume and selling  prices. The
increase in inventory of $37.3 million  was primarily due to increased cost of  raw materials and planned
increases in European safety stocks. The  increase in inventory and accounts  receivable was partially
offset by increased accounts payable,  accrued expenses and other liabilities of $29.5  million.

We  used $119.2 million of net cash for investing activities in 2006.  We used $91.1  million  to  fund

the acquisitions of Changsha, ATS, Calflex  and Ningbo, Kimsafe  and Teknigas, $1.9 million  in
additional costs related to 2005 acquisitions and $0.4 million to complete the planned increase of our
ownership in Stern. We invested $11.8 million in investment grade  auction rate securities  and
$44.7 million in capital equipment. Capital expenditures consisted  of  approximately $26.7 million  for
manufacturing machinery and equipment and approximately $18.0 million for the purchase of land and
a building and for infrastructure improvements for  a site in  Italy. We  subsequently entered  into  a
sale-leaseback transaction with respect  to the building. We received proceeds  of $31.9 million, which
primarily included $16.0 million related to the sale-leaseback  in Italy  and  $13.4  million  from the sales
of two facilities in northern Italy. We  also  received  proceeds from two buildings held for sale,  totaling
approximately $2.5 million during 2006.

We  generated $331.3 million of net cash from financing activities for  2006. On  November 21,  2006,
we completed a public offering of 5.75  million shares of newly issued  Class A Common Stock  at $40.00
per  share. Net proceeds were approximately $218.6 million after taking into account underwriting
discounts and expenses associated with  the transaction. Additionally, we generated cash through the
completion of our $225.0 million private placement  of 5.85% notes in April  2006, increased borrowings
under our line of credit for use in Europe and proceeds from  the exercise of stock options, partially
offset by payments of debt, dividend  payments and debt issue costs.

We  generated $0.9 million of net cash by  operations from discontinued  operations in  2006. We also

received approximately $2.8 million in  cash for  reimbursement of defense costs related to the  James
Jones Litigation. During 2006, we paid  approximately  $0.6 million for  defense  costs and approximately
$0.5 million for indemnity costs we incurred in the James  Jones  Litigation.

We  had free cash flow of $120.9 million (a non-GAAP financial  measure defined as net cash
provided by continuing operations minus capital expenditures  plus proceeds from sale of assets) during
the year ended December 31, 2008 versus  free cash flow of $54.5  million in  2007. This  increase in 2008
compared to 2007 was primarily due to growth in cash generated  by operations from more  focused
working capital management. Our net  debt to capitalization  ratio (a non-GAAP financial measure
defined as short and long-term interest-bearing  liabilities  less  cash and cash equivalents  as a percentage
of the sum of short and long term interest-bearing liabilities less cash and cash  equivalents plus total
stockholders’ equity) increased to 22.8% for  2008 from 13.5% for 2007. The increase  resulted from the
use of cash to purchase Bl¨ucher and for funds used in our stock repurchase program. 

40

We  had free cash flow of $54.5 million during the year ended December  31, 2007  versus free cash

flow of $70.2 million in 2006. This decrease in 2007 compared to 2006 was  primarily  due  to  the
proceeds from the sale of property, plant  and equipment  in 2006 partially offset by growth in cash
generated by operations.

We  believe free cash flow to be an appropriate  supplemental measure of our  operating

performance because it provides investors with a measure  of our ability to generate cash,  to  repay debt
and to fund acquisitions. We may not be comparable to other companies  that may  define free cash flow
differently. Free cash flow does not represent cash generated  from operating activities in  accordance
with GAAP. Therefore it should not  be  considered an alternative to net cash provided  by  operations  as
an indication of our performance. Free  cash flow  should also  not be considered an alternative to net
cash provided by operations as defined  by  GAAP.

A reconciliation of net cash provided  by continuing  operations to free cash  flow is provided  below:

Net cash provided by continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: additions to property, plant, and equipment
Plus: proceeds from the sale of property, plant,  and  equipment . . . . . . . . . . .

Years Ended December  31,

2008

2007

2006

(in millions)
$ 91.7
(37.8)
0.6

$146.4
(26.6)
1.1

$ 83.0
(44.7)
31.9

Free cash flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$120.9

$ 54.5

$ 70.2

Our net  debt to capitalization ratio is  also a non-GAAP financial measure used by management.

Management believes it to be an appropriate supplemental  measure because  it helps  investors
understand our ability to meet our financing needs and as  a basis to evaluate our financial structure.
Our computation may not be comparable  to  other  companies that may define net debt to capitalization
differently.

A reconciliation of long-term debt (including current portion) to net debt and  our net  debt  to

capitalization ratio is provided below:

December 31,

2008

2007

Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plus: long-term debt, net of current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

$

(in millions)
4.5
409.8
(165.6)

1.3
432.2
(290.3)

Net debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 248.7

$ 143.2

A reconciliation of capitalization is provided  below:

Net debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 248.7
842.4

$ 143.2
915.5

Capitalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,091.1

$1,058.7

Net debt to capitalization ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22.8%

13.5%

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)

41

Our contractual obligations as of December 31,  2008 are presented in  the following table:

Contractual Obligations

Payments Due by Period

Total

Less than
1 year

1–3 years

3–5 years

(in millions)

More  than
5 years

Long-term debt obligations, including current

maturities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital lease obligations(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earnout payments(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$414.3
26.0
14.6
23.8
129.6
0.4
29.7

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$638.4

$ 4.5
7.7
1.3
6.3
22.6
0.4
25.3

$68.1

$106.5
7.9
2.8
6.1
39.5
—
2.0

$164.8

$ 76.5
4.3
2.5
3.1
33.4
—
1.2

$121.0

$226.8
6.1
8.0
8.3
34.1
—
1.2

$284.5

(a) as recognized in the consolidated  balance sheet

(b) assumes the balance on the revolving credit facility remains at $55.0 million and the interest rate

remains at approximately 3.6% for the  presented periods

(c)

includes commodity, capital expenditure commitments and other benefits at  December 31, 2008

We  maintain letters of credit that guarantee our performance  or payment  to  third parties in

accordance with specified terms and  conditions. Amounts outstanding were  approximately  $39.3 million
as of  December 31, 2008 and $45.0 million  as of December 31, 2007. Our  letters of credit are  primarily
associated with insurance coverage and  to a lesser extent  foreign purchases and generally expire  within
one year of issuance. These instruments  may exist or expire without  being  drawn down,  therefore they
do not necessarily represent future cash flow obligations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Except for operating lease commitments, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements  that  have or
are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial  condition,  changes in financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or  capital
resources that is material to investors.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and  Key Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated  financial statements in accordance with U.S.  GAAP requires

management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported. A critical
accounting estimate is an assumption about highly  uncertain matters and could have a  material  effect
on the consolidated financial statements if  another,  also reasonable, amount were used, or,  a change in
the estimate is reasonably likely from  period to period. We  base  our assumptions on historical
experience and on other estimates that we believe are  reasonable under  the circumstances. Actual
results could differ significantly from these  estimates. There were  no changes in accounting policies or
significant changes in accounting estimates during 2008.

We  periodically discuss the development, selection and disclosure of the  estimates with our Audit
Committee. Management believes the following critical accounting  policies  reflect  its  more significant
estimates and assumptions.

Revenue recognition

We  recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met:  (1) we have  entered into a

binding  agreement, (2) the product has shipped and title  has passed, (3) the sales  price to the customer

42

is fixed or is determinable and (4) collectibility is reasonably  assured.  We recognize revenue based upon
a determination that all criteria for revenue recognition have  been met,  which, based on  the majority of
our  shipping terms, is considered to  have occurred  upon shipment of the finished product.  Some
shipping terms require the goods to be received  by  the customer before title passes.  In  those instances,
revenues are not recognized until the  customer has received the  goods. We  record estimated reductions
to revenue for customer returns and  allowances and for  customer programs. Provisions  for returns  and
allowances are made at the time of sale, derived from historical trends  and form  a portion of the
allowance for doubtful accounts. Customer  programs, which are  primarily  annual volume incentive
plans, allow customers to earn credit for attaining agreed  upon purchase targets  from us. We record
estimated reductions to revenue, made at  the time  of  sale, for customer programs based on estimated
purchase targets.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts is  established to represent our best estimate of the net

realizable value of the outstanding accounts receivable.  The  development of our allowance  for doubtful
accounts varies by region but in general  is based on a review of past due  amounts, historical write-off
experience, as well as aging trends affecting specific accounts  and general operational  factors affecting
all accounts. In North America, management  specifically  analyzes individual accounts receivable and
establishes specific reserves against financially troubled  customers. In addition, factors  are developed
utilizing historical trends in bad debts,  returns and allowances. The ratio of these factors to sales on a
rolling twelve-month basis is applied to total outstanding receivables  (net  of accounts specifically
identified) to establish a reserve. In Europe, management develops their bad debt allowance through an
aging analysis of all their accounts. In  China, management  specifically  analyzes individual accounts
receivable and establishes specific reserves as needed. In addition, for waterworks customers, whose
payment terms are generally extended,  we reserve the majority of accounts receivable  in excess of one
year from the invoice date.

We  uniformly consider current economic trends and changes in customer  payment  terms when

evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. We also aggressively  monitor the
creditworthiness of our largest customers, and  periodically review  customer credit  limits to reduce risk.
If circumstances relating to specific customers  change or unanticipated changes occur  in the general
business environment, our estimates of  the recoverability of receivables  could  be  further adjusted.

Inventory valuation

Inventories are stated at the lower of  cost or market with costs  determined primarily on a  first-in

first-out basis. We utilize both specific  product identification and historical product  demand as the  basis
for determining our excess or obsolete  inventory reserve.  We identify all inventories that exceed  a range
of one to four years in sales. This is determined by comparing the current  inventory balance against
unit sales for the trailing twelve months. New  products added to inventory  within the past  twelve
months are excluded from this analysis. A portion  of our products contain recoverable materials,
therefore the excess and obsolete reserve is established net of any  recoverable  amounts.  Changes in
market conditions, lower than expected  customer demand or changes in  technology or features could
result in additional obsolete inventory  that is not saleable  and could require additional inventory
reserve  provisions.

In certain countries, additional inventory reserves are maintained for  potential shrinkage

experienced in the manufacturing process. The  reserve is established based  on the prior year’s inventory
losses adjusted for any change in the gross  inventory balance.

Goodwill and other intangibles

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives  are tested annually for impairment in

accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards  Board Statement No.  142 ‘‘Goodwill

43

and Other Intangible Assets’’ (FAS 142). We use  our  judgment in  assessing  whether assets may  have
become  impaired between annual impairment tests. Due to the current  economic conditions as well as
other business factors, we concluded that the  goodwill  of  our  Water Quality  reporting unit was
impaired on October 26, 2008, the time of our  latest annual review. We recorded a  charge of
$22.0 million in the fourth quarter in  accordance with FAS  142. We perform our annual test  for
indicators of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets impairment in the  fourth quarter of  our
fiscal year or sooner if indicators of impairment exist.

Intangible assets such as purchased technology  are generally recorded in connection with a
business acquisition. Values assigned  to  intangible assets are determined by  an independent  valuation
firm based on our estimates and judgments regarding  expectations of the success and life cycle of
products and technology acquired.

We  use a discounted cash flow method  to  determine the  fair value of each reporting  unit. We have

eight reporting units, based on the guidance contained  in FAS 142 and related literature.  The
discounted cash flow model includes a  number of estimates  of future cash  flows. We  develop  our
assumptions based on our historical results including  sales growth, operating  profits, working capital
levels and tax rates. In our 2008 testing, we  also incorporated  assumptions regarding  the current
economic environment, including expectations regarding when  the recession  would end and at what
point we would see orders return to  historical levels.

We  believe that the discounted cash flow model is sensitive to the selected discount  rate. We  use

third-party experts to help develop appropriate discount rates  for each reporting unit.  We use standard
valuation practices to arrive at a weighted average cost of capital based on the market and guideline
public companies. The higher the discount  rate, the  lower the discounted cash  flows.  While  we believe
that our estimates of future cash flows  are  reasonable,  different assumptions  could  significantly  affect
our  valuations and result in impairments  in the future.

Other changes that may affect our valuations include, but are not limited to, product acceptances
and regulatory approval. If actual product acceptance differs significantly from  our estimates, we may
be required to record an impairment  charge to write down the assets to their realizable  value. A severe
decline  in market value could result in  an unexpected impairment  charge to goodwill, which could have
a material impact on the results of operations and financial position. Although we  have not experienced
goodwill impairment in our remaining  reporting units, there  can be no  assurances that future goodwill
impairment will not occur.

Product liability and workers’ compensation costs

Because of retention requirements associated with our  insurance policies, we are generally
self-insured for potential product liability  claims and for workers’ compensation costs associated with
workplace accidents. For product liability  cases in the U.S., management estimates expected settlement
costs by utilizing loss reports provided by our  third-party administrators as well as developing internal
historical trend factors based on our  specific claims experience. Management  utilizes the internal trend
factors that reflect final expected settlement costs. In  other  countries, we  maintain insurance coverage
with relatively high deductible payments, as product liability claims  tend to  be  smaller than those
experienced in the U.S. Changes in the  nature of claims or the actual settlement amounts could affect
the adequacy of this estimate and require changes to the provisions. Because the liability is  an estimate,
the ultimate liability may be more or  less than reported.

Workers’ compensation liabilities in the U.S. are recognized for claims incurred  (including claims

incurred but not reported) and for changes  in the status of individual  case reserves. At the time a
workers’ compensation claim is filed, a  liability is  estimated  to  settle the claim. The liability for
workers’ compensation claims is determined based on  management’s estimates of the nature  and
severity of the claims and based on analysis provided by third party administrators  and by various state
statutes and reserve requirements. We  have  developed our  own trend factors based on our specific
claims experience.  In other countries  where workers’ compensation costs  are applicable, we maintain

44

insurance coverage with limited deductible  payments. Because  the  liability  is an estimate, the ultimate
liability may be more or less than reported.

We  determine the trend factors for product  liability  and  workers’  compensation  liabilities  based on

consultation with outside actuaries.

We  maintain excess liability insurance  with outside insurance  carriers  to  minimize our risks related
to catastrophic claims in excess of all  self-insured positions. Any material  change in  the aforementioned
factors could have an adverse impact on our operating results.

Legal contingencies

We  are a defendant in numerous legal  matters including those involving environmental  law  and
product  liability as discussed further in Part  I,  Item  1, ‘‘Business—Product Liability, Environmental and
Other Litigation Matters.’’ As required  by Statement of Financial Accounting  Standards No. 5
‘‘Accounting for Contingencies’’ (FAS  5),  we  determine  whether  an estimated loss from a loss
contingency should be accrued by assessing whether  a loss  is deemed probable  and the  loss amount  can
be reasonably estimated, net of any applicable insurance  proceeds. Estimates  of  potential outcomes of
these contingencies are developed in  consultation  with outside counsel. While this assessment is based
upon all available information, litigation is inherently  uncertain  and the actual liability to fully resolve
this  litigation cannot be predicted with any assurance of accuracy. Final resolution of these matters
could possibly result in significant effects  on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Pension benefits

We  account for our pension plans in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards

No. 87 ‘‘Employers Accounting for Pensions’’  (FAS 87) and Statement of  Financial  Accounting
Standards No. 158, ‘‘Employers’ Accounting  for Defined Benefit  Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88,  106, and  132(R),’’ (FAS 158). In applying
FAS 87 and FAS 158, assumptions are  made regarding the valuation of benefit  obligations and  the
performance of plan assets. The primary assumptions  are as  follows:

(cid:129) Weighted average discount rate—this rate  is used to estimate the current value of future

benefits. This rate is adjusted based on movement  in long-term interest rates.

(cid:129) Expected long-term rate of return  on assets—this  rate is used to estimate  future growth  in
investments and investment earnings.  The expected return  is based  upon a  combination  of
historical market performance and anticipated future returns for  a portfolio reflecting the  mix of
equity, debt and other investments indicative  of our plan  assets.

(cid:129) Rates of increase in compensation  levels—this  rate is used to estimate  projected annual pay
increases, which are used to determine the wage base used to project employees’  pension
benefits at retirement.

We  determine these assumptions based on  consultation with  outside actuaries and investment

advisors. Any variance in these assumptions could have  a significant  impact on future  recognized
pension costs, assets and liabilities.

Income taxes

We  estimate and use our expected annual effective  income tax rates  to  accrue income taxes.

Effective tax rates  are determined based on budgeted earnings  before  taxes, including our best estimate
of permanent items that will affect the effective rate for the year. Management periodically  reviews
these rates with outside tax advisors and  changes are made if material  variances from expectations are
identified.

45

We  recognize deferred taxes for the  expected future consequences of  events that have been

reflected in the consolidated financial  statements  in accordance with the rules of Statement  of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109 ‘‘Accounting for Income Taxes’’ (FAS 109). Under FAS 109, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between  the book values and tax bases of
particular assets and liabilities, using  tax  rates in effect  for the  years  in which  the differences are
expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided  to  offset any net deferred tax  assets if, based
upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will
not be realized. We consider estimated future taxable income and ongoing prudent tax planning
strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance.

On January 1, 2007, we adopted the  provisions  of  Financial  Interpretation No. 48  ‘‘Accounting for

Uncertainty in Income Taxes’’ (FIN 48). The purpose of FIN 48 is to increase  the comparability in
financial reporting of income taxes. FIN  48 requires  that in order for  a tax benefit to be booked in the
income statement, the item in question must meet the  more-likely-than-not  (greater than  50%
likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the  taxing  authorities) threshold. The adoption of
FIN 48 did not have a material effect on  our financial statements. No  cumulative effect  was  booked
through beginning retained earnings.

During  2008, we reduced our unrecognized tax  benefits by approximately $2.2 million as  a result of

finalizing federal and state income tax  audits. We estimate that it  is reasonably possible that a portion
of the currently remaining unrecognized tax benefit  may be recognized by  the end of 2009 as a result of
the conclusion of the federal income  tax audit. The amount of  expense  accrued for penalties and
interest is $1.1 million worldwide.

As of December 31, 2008, we had gross  unrecognized tax benefits  of approximately  $2.3 million of

which,  approximately $1.9 million if recognized, would affect the effective  tax rate. The difference
between the amount of unrecognized  tax  benefits and the amount that would  impact  the effective tax
rate consists of the federal tax benefit  of state  income  tax items.

New Accounting Standards

In June 2008, the Financial Accounting  Standards Board (FASB)  issued FASB Staff Position  (FSP)

EITF Issue No. 03-6-1, ‘‘Determining Whether  Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities’’ (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 requires that unvested
share-based payment awards that contain rights  to  receive non-forfeitable dividends or dividend
equivalents to be included in the two-class  method of computing earnings per share as  described in
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 128, ‘‘Earnings per Share.’’ This  FSP is
effective for financial statements issued  for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those years. Accordingly,  we  will  adopt  FSP EITF  03-6-1 in  fiscal year  2009. The
adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 is not expected to have a material impact  on our consolidated financial
statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 162, ‘‘The  Hierarchy  of Generally Accepted Principles,’’
(FAS 162), which identifies the sources  of accounting  principles and the  framework for selecting the
principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are
presented in conformity with generally  accepted accounting principles (GAAP)  in the United States
(the GAAP hierarchy). FAS 162 is effective 60 days  following  the SEC’s  approval of the  Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments  to  AU Section 411, ‘‘The  Meaning of Present
Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.’’ The adoption of FAS 162 is  not
expected to have an impact on our consolidated  financial  statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No.  FAS 142-3, ‘‘Determination of the Useful  Life of
Intangible Assets.’’ This FSP amends  the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or
extension assumptions used to determine  the useful life  of a recognized intangible asset  under FAS
No. 142, ‘‘Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets’’ (FAS 142). The objective of this FSP is  to  improve
the consistency between the useful life  of a  recognized  intangible asset under FAS 142 and the period

46

of expected cash flows used to measure the  fair value of the  asset  under  FAS 141(R), and  other
principles of GAAP. This FSP applies to all intangible assets,  whether  acquired in a business
combination or otherwise, and shall be  effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods  within those fiscal years and  applied
prospectively to intangible assets acquired after  the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. The
adoption of this FSP will not have a  significant impact on  our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161, ‘‘Disclosures about  Derivative  Instruments  and
Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,’’ (FAS 161), which  expands  the current
disclosure requirements of FAS 133, ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Instruments  and Hedging Activities,’’
such that entities must now provide enhanced disclosures  on a quarterly basis  regarding how  and why
the entity uses derivatives; how derivatives and related hedged items are  accounted for  under FAS 133
and how  derivatives and related hedged items affect the entity’s financial position, performance and
cash flow. FAS 161 is effective prospectively for annual and  interim periods  beginning  on or  after
November 15, 2008. Accordingly, we  will  adopt FAS  161 in 2009.

In December 2007, the FASB issued  FAS No. 141 (R),’’ Business Combinations,’’ (FAS  141R),
which  requires most identifiable assets,  liabilities, non-controlling interests, and goodwill acquired in a
business combination to be recorded at ‘‘full fair  value.’’ Under FAS 141R, all business combinations
will be accounted for under the acquisition  method. Significant changes,  among others,  from current
guidance resulting from FAS 141R includes the requirement that contingent assets and  liabilities  and
contingent consideration shall be recorded  at estimated fair value as of  the  acquisition  date, with any
subsequent changes in fair value charged  or  credited to earnings.  Further, acquisition-related costs  will
be expensed rather than treated as part  of the  acquisition.  FAS 141R is  effective for periods beginning
on or after December 15, 2008. We expect  the adoption of  FAS 141R will increase costs charged  to
operations made after January 1, 2009.

In December 2007, the FASB issued  FAS No. 160, ‘‘Non-controlling  Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an amendment  of  ARB  NO. 151,’’ (FAS 160), which  requires non-controlling
interests (previously referred to as minority interest) to be treated as a separate component of equity,
not outside of equity as is current practice.  FAS  160 applies  to  non-controlling interests and
transactions with non-controlling interest  holders in consolidated financial statements.  FAS  160 is
effective for periods beginning on or  after December 15, 2008.  We do  not expect the adoption  of
FAS 160 will have a material impact  on  its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS  No. 159, ‘‘The Fair  Value Option for  Financial Assets and

Financial Liabilities—including an Amendment to FAS No.  115,’’ (FAS  159), which permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain  other  items at fair  value. FAS 159 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after  November 15, 2007  and interim periods
within those fiscal  years. Earlier application is  encouraged. We  have elected not to measure our eligible
financial instruments at fair value and  therefore  the adoption of FAS 159 did not have an  impact  on
our  consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange  Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 108, ‘‘Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying  Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements’’ (SAB 108), which  provides  interpretive guidance on how the
effects of the carryover or reversal of  prior year misstatements should be  considered in quantifying a
current year misstatement. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending  after November  15, 2006. The
impact of SAB 108 was not material  to  our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No.  158, ‘‘Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit

Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of  FASB Statements No.  87, 88, 106, and
132(R)’’ (FAS 158), which requires an  employer  to: (a)  recognize in its statement of financial position
an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a  liability  for a  plan’s underfunded status; (b) measure a
plan’s assets and its obligations that determine  its  funded status as of the end of  the employer’s  fiscal
year; and (c) recognize changes in the  funded status of a  defined  benefit  postretirement plan in the

47

year in which the changes occur. Those changes  are reported in other comprehensive income. The
requirement to recognize the funded status  of a benefit plan and the disclosure  requirements are
effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006 for companies with publicly
traded equity securities. The requirement to measure plan  assets and  benefit obligations  as of the date
of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement  of  financial position  is effective for fiscal years ending  after
December 15, 2008, although earlier  adoption is permitted. As a result of the  requirement to recognize
the funded status of our benefit plans  as of  December 31,  2006, we recorded an increase in our
pension liability of approximately $8.3  million,  a decrease of approximately $1.3  million  in other assets:
other, net and a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of approximately $5.8 million,
net of tax. We have early-adopted the measurement date provisions of FAS 158  effective  January 1,
2007. Our pension plans previously used a September 30 measurement date. All plans are now
measured as of December 31, consistent with our fiscal year end. The  non-cash effect  of  the adoption
of the measurement date provisions of  FAS 158 was not material and there was  no effect on our results
of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No.  157, ‘‘Fair  Value Measurements,’’  (FAS 157), which
defines fair value, establishes guidelines  for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair
value measurements. FAS 157 does not  require any  new  fair value measurements but rather eliminates
inconsistencies in guidance found in various  prior accounting pronouncements and was effective for
fiscal years beginning after November  15, 2007.  In February 2008,  the FASB issued  FASB FSP 157-2
which  delayed the effective date of FAS 157  for all  nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
except those that are recognized or disclosed at  fair value in  the financial statements on  a recurring
basis (at least annually), until fiscal years  beginning after November 15, 2008,  and interim  periods
within those fiscal  years. These nonfinancial items include  assets and liabilities  such as  reporting units
measured at fair value in a goodwill  impairment test and nonfinancial  assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in a business combination. Effective  January 1,  2008,  we  adopted FAS 157 for financial assets
and liabilities recognized at fair value  on a recurring basis. The partial  adoption  of FAS 157 for
financial assets and liabilities did not have  a material impact on  our consolidated  financial  position,
results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2006, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 48, ‘‘Accounting  for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes’’ (FIN 48), which clarifies  the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes  recognized in
the financial statements in accordance  with SFAS  No. 109, ‘‘Accounting  for  Income Taxes.’’ FIN 48
provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is  more likely
than not that the position will be sustained upon  examination,  based on the technical merits. This
interpretation also provides guidance  on measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. We adopted the  provisions of FIN 48
as of  January 1, 2007 and the impact was  not  material  to  our consolidated  financial statements.

In March 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 156, ‘‘Accounting for Servicing of Financial  Assets—an

amendment of FASB Statement No.  140’’ (FAS 156). FAS 156 amends FAS Statement  No. 140,
‘‘Accounting for Transfers and Servicing  of  Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,’’ with
respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing  liabilities.  FAS  156
addresses the recognition and measurement of separately recognized servicing  assets and liabilities and
provides an approach to simplify efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset) accounting. We  adopted  FAS 156
as of  January 1, 2007 and the impact was  not  material  to  our consolidated  financial statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued FAS  No. 155, ‘‘Accounting  for  Certain Hybrid Financial

Instruments—an amendment of FASB  Statements No. 133 and 140’’ (FAS  155).  FAS 155 amends
FAS 133, ‘‘Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities,’’ and FAS  140, ‘‘Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and  Extinguishments of Liabilities,’’ and allows an entity to remeasure
at fair value a hybrid financial instrument  that  contains an  embedded derivative that otherwise  would
require bifurcation from the host, if the  holder irrevocably elects to account for the whole instrument
on a fair value basis. Subsequent changes in the fair value of  the instrument would  be  recognized in

48

earnings. We adopted FAS 155 as of  January 1, 2007  and  the impact was not material to our
consolidated financial statements.

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We  use derivative financial instruments primarily to reduce exposure to adverse fluctuations in
foreign exchange rates, interest rates and costs of certain raw materials used in the manufacturing
process. We  do not enter into derivative  financial instruments for trading purposes. As  a matter  of
policy, all derivative positions are used  to  reduce risk by hedging underlying economic exposure.  The
derivatives we use are instruments with  liquid markets.

Our consolidated earnings, which are reported in  United States dollars,  are subject to translation
risks due to changes in foreign currency  exchange  rates. This  risk is concentrated in the exchange rate
between the U.S. dollar and the euro;  the U.S. dollar and the  Canadian dollar;  and the  U.S. dollar  and
the Chinese yuan.

Our foreign subsidiaries transact most business, including certain intercompany transactions, in

foreign currencies. Such transactions are  principally  purchases or sales of materials and are
denominated in European currencies or  the U.S.  or Canadian dollar. We  use foreign currency forward
exchange contracts to manage the risk related to intercompany purchases that occur during the course
of a year and certain open foreign currency denominated  commitments to sell products to third  parties.
For 2008, the amounts recorded in other income for the  change in the fair value  of such contracts was
immaterial.

We  have historically had a low exposure on the  cost of our debt to changes in  interest  rates.
Information  about our long-term debt  including  principal  amounts and related interest rates appears in
Note 11 of notes to the consolidated financial statements in our  Annual  Report on  Form  10-K for  the
year ended December 31, 2008.

We  purchase significant amounts of bronze  ingot,  brass rod,  cast iron, steel and  plastic, which  are

utilized in manufacturing our many product  lines. Our operating  results can be adversely affected by
changes in commodity prices if we are unable to pass  on related price increases to our customers. We
manage this risk by monitoring related  market  prices, working with our  suppliers  to  achieve  the
maximum level of stability in their costs and related pricing,  seeking alternative supply sources when
necessary and passing increases in commodity costs to our customers, to the maximum  extent possible,
when they occur.

During  2008, we entered into a series of copper swap  contracts  to  fix the  price per pound of
copper  for one customer. These swaps are classified as economic hedges,  as more fully explained in
Note 16 of notes to the consolidated financial statements. For  the period  ended December  31, 2008, we
recorded  $1.8 million in losses associated with the copper swaps in other  expense. We believe  that  if
copper  prices continue to decrease that  the  open copper swap  contracts will  result in  additional losses
that may occur in a period different from when that cost  is recovered  from the  customer.

The Company used a discounted cash flow  model  for determining the value of the ARS and the
UBS rights. As there is no active market for the ARS and the rights are non-transferable, we  believe
that the discounted cash flow model gives  the best estimate of fair  value at December 31, 2008.  The
model includes assumptions that are  more fully explained in  Note 16  of  notes  to  the consolidated
financial statements. The most sensitive  of these assumptions is the illiquidity  spread. We engaged
valuation experts to develop the models. The illiquidity spread increases the discount rate,  thereby
decreasing the estimated fair value. To  value the  rights issued by UBS, we used  a discounted cash flow
model to estimate  the fair value of the ARS with the rights. The value of the rights  was determined by
looking at the difference between the  ARS as determined  compared to the ARS  with the rights. While
we believe the assumptions used are  consistent  with the current market view on the ARS and are
reasonable, different assumptions could  significantly  affect our valuation of ARS.

49

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The financial statements listed in section (a)  (1)  of  ‘‘Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and  Financial

Statement Schedules’’ of this annual report are incorporated herein by  reference.

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING  AND

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under  the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as of  the end of the

period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision  and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer  and  Chief  Financial Officer, of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls  and  procedures. In designing  and evaluating our disclosure
controls and procedures, we recognize  that  any  controls and procedures,  no matter how well  designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance  of achieving  the desired control objectives, and
our  management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating  and implementing possible controls  and
procedures. The effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures is  also necessarily limited by
the staff and other resources available to  us and  the geographic  diversity  of our operations. Based upon
that evaluation, the Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer  concluded that, as of the  end
of the period covered by this report,  our disclosure controls and procedures were  effective, in that they
provide reasonable assurance that information  required to be disclosed  by  us in the reports we file  or
submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange  Commission’s rules and  forms and are designed to
ensure that information required to be  disclosed  by  us  in the reports  that  we file  or submit under  the
Exchange Act are  accumulated and communicated to our management, including  our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer,  as appropriate  to  allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. There was no change in our  internal  control  over financial reporting  that  occurred during
the quarter ended December 31, 2008, that has materially  affected,  or  is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial  reporting. In connection with these rules, we  will  continue to
review and document our disclosure  controls and procedures,  including our internal control over
financial reporting, and may from time  to time  make  changes aimed  at  enhancing  their effectiveness
and to ensure that our systems evolve with our business.

50

Management’s Annual Report on Internal  Control Over Financial  Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal

control over financial reporting as defined  in Rules 13a-15(f) and  15d-15(f) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control  over  financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of  financial  reporting and  the preparation  of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting  principles.  The
Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies  and procedures that:

(i) pertain to the maintenance of records  that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect

the transactions and dispositions of the assets  of  the Company;

(ii) provide reasonable assurance that  transactions are recorded as necessary  to  permit

preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company  are  being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors  of  the Company;  and

(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding  prevention or timely detection of unauthorized

acquisition, use or  disposition of the  Company’s assets that  could have  a material effect on the
financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over  financial  reporting may not prevent or

detect misstatements. Also, projections  of any evaluation  of  effectiveness to future periods are  subject
to the risk that controls may become inadequate  because of changes in conditions, or  that  the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and  Chief Financial  Officer, assessed  the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December  31, 2008. In
making this assessment, management  used the criteria set  forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal  Control—Integrated Framework.

Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that  the  Company maintained

effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,  2008.

The audited consolidated financial statements  of  the Company  include the results  of  Bl¨ucher Metal

A/S and its subsidiaries, which the Company acquired on May 30, 2008,  but management’s assessment
does not include an assessment of the internal  control over  financial reporting of these entities.

The independent registered public accounting  firm  that audited  the Company’s consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in  this Annual Report on Form 10-K has  issued an attestation
report on the Company’s internal control over  financial reporting. That report appears immediately
following this report.

51

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.:

We  have audited Watts Water Technologies,  Inc.’s internal  control over  financial reporting  as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations  of the Treadway Commission  (COSO). Watts  Water
Technologies, Inc.’s management is responsible for  maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the  effectiveness  of  internal control  over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying  Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion  on the  Company’s internal  control over financial reporting
based on our audit.

We  conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of  the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those  standards require that we  plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether  effective  internal control over financial reporting was maintained
in all material respects. Our audit included  obtaining an understanding  of internal control  over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a  material weakness exists, and testing and  evaluating  the
design and operating effectiveness of internal  control  based on the assessed risk. Our  audit also
included performing such other procedures as we considered  necessary in the circumstances.  We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable  basis  for our  opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide  reasonable

assurance regarding the reliability of  financial  reporting and the preparation  of  financial  statements  for
external  purposes in accordance with  generally accepted accounting  principles. A company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)  pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable  detail, accurately and fairly reflect the  transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions  are
recorded  as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in  accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made  only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and  (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention  or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the company’s assets that  could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over  financial  reporting may not prevent or

detect misstatements. Also, projections  of any evaluation  of  effectiveness to future periods are  subject
to the risk that controls may become inadequate  because of changes in conditions, or  that  the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Watts Water Technologies, Inc.  maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as  of December  31, 2008, based  on  criteria established  in
Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring  Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. acquired  Bl¨ucher Metal A/S and subsidiaries during 2008, and
management excluded from its assessment of the  effectiveness  of Watts Water Technologies,  Inc.’s
internal control over financial reporting as  of December  31, 2008, Bl¨ucher Metal A/S and subsidiaries’
internal control over financial reporting associated with total  assets of $190.3 million and total revenues
of $50.8 million included in the consolidated financial  statements of  Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31,  2008.  Our audit  of  internal control over
financial reporting of Watts Water Technologies, Inc. also excluded  an evaluation of  the internal control
over financial reporting of Bl¨ucher Metal A/S and subsidiaries.

We  also have audited, in accordance with the standards of  the Public Company Accounting

Oversight Board (United States), the  consolidated balance sheets of Watts  Water Technologies, Inc.  and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,  and  the related consolidated statements  of  operations,

52

stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for  each of the years in the  three-year period ended December 31,
2008, and our report dated February 27,  2009 expressed  an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements.

Boston, Massachusetts
February 27, 2009

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

53

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Information with respect to the executive officers of the Company is set forth in Part I, Item 1  of

this  Report under the caption ‘‘Executive Officers and Directors’’ and  is incorporated herein by
reference. The information provided  under  the captions  ‘‘Information as  to  Nominees for  Director,’’
‘‘Corporate Governance,’’ and ‘‘Section 16(a) Beneficial  Ownership Reporting Compliance’’ in our
definitive Proxy Statement for our 2009  Annual Meeting of Stockholders to  be  held on May 13,  2009 is
incorporated herein by reference.

We  have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics  applicable to all officers,  employees and
Board members. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics  is posted in  the Investor Relations section
of our website,  www.wattswater.com. We will provide you with a print copy  of  our Code  of Business
Conduct and Ethics free of charge on  written request to Kenneth R.  Lepage, Secretary,  Watts Water
Technologies, Inc., 815 Chestnut Street, North Andover, MA  01845. Any amendments to, or  waivers of,
the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics which apply to our  chief executive  officer, chief  financial
officer, corporate controller or any person  performing  similar functions will  be  disclosed on our  website
promptly following the date of such amendment  or waiver.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The information provided under the captions ‘‘Director Compensation,’’ ‘‘Corporate Governance,’’

‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis,’’  ‘‘Executive Compensation,’’ ‘‘Compensation  Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation,’’ and ‘‘Compensation Committee Report’’ in our definitive  Proxy
Statement for our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  to be held on May 13,  2009 is incorporated
herein by reference.

The ‘‘Compensation Committee Report’’ contained in our Proxy Statement shall not be deemed
‘‘soliciting material’’ or ‘‘filed’’ with the  Securities and  Exchange Commission  or otherwise subject to
the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities  Exchange Act of  1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated
by reference in any filings under the Securities Act  of  1933 or  the  Exchange Act, except  to  the extent
we specifically request that such information  be  treated as soliciting  material  or specifically  incorporate
such information by reference into a  document filed under the Securities Act or Exchange Act.

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL  OWNERS  AND MANAGEMENT  AND

RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The information appearing under the caption  ‘‘Principal Stockholders’’ in the Registrant’s Proxy

Statement relating to the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on  May 13, 2009 is
incorporated herein by reference.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information as  of  December  31, 2008, about the shares of Class A

Common Stock that may be issued upon  the exercise of stock  options issued under the Company’s
2004 Stock Incentive Plan, 1991 Directors’  Non-Qualified Stock  Option Plan, 1996 Stock Option Plan
and 2003 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan and the  settlement of restricted stock  units

54

granted under our Management Stock Purchase Plan as well as the number  of  shares remaining for
future issuance under our 2004 Stock  Incentive Plan and  Management Stock Purchase  Plan.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)

Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)

Number of securities remaining
available  for future issuance under
equity compensation plan
(excluding  securities reflected in
column (a))
(c)

1,513,106(1)

$25.24

2,827,218(2)

None
1,513,106(1)

None
$25.24

None
2,827,218(2)

Plan Category

Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders . . . .

Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

(1) Represents 1,216,471 outstanding options under the  1991 Directors’  Non-Qualified Stock Option

Plan, 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan, 2003  Non-Employee  Directors’ Stock  Option Plan and
2004 Stock Incentive Plan, and 296,635 outstanding restricted  stock units under the Management
Stock Purchase Plan.

(2) Includes 1,864,393 shares available for future issuance under  the 2004 Stock  Incentive Plan,  and

962,825 shares available for future issuance under the Management Stock Purchase Plan.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND  DIRECTOR

INDEPENDENCE.

The information provided under the captions ‘‘Corporate Governance’’  and ‘‘Policies and
Procedures for Related Person Transactions’’ in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May  13, 2009  is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

The information provided under the caption ‘‘Ratification  of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm’’ in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  to
be held on May 13, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference.

55

Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a)(1) Financial Statements

PART IV

The following financial statements are included in a  separate  section  of this  Report commencing

on the page numbers specified below:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting  Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31,

2008, 2007 and 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31,  2008 and 2007 . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’  Equity  for the  years  ended

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  for  the years ended December  31,

59

60
61

62

2008, 2007 and 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

63
64–102

(a)(2) Schedules

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying  Accounts for the years ended

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

103

All other required schedules for which provision  is made in the applicable accounting  regulations

of the Securities and Exchange Commission  are included in the Notes to  the Consolidated Financial
Statements.

(a)(3) Exhibits

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding  the exhibits are filed  as part  of this

Annual Report on Form 10-K.

56

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934, the

registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its  behalf  by the undersigned,  thereunto duly
authorized.

SIGNATURES

WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

By:

/S/ PATRICK S. O’KEEFE

Patrick S. O’Keefe
Chief Executive Officer
President and Director

DATED: February 27, 2009

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934,  this report has been signed

below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities  and on the dates
indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/S/ PATRICK S. O’KEEFE

Patrick S. O’Keefe

Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director

February 27, 2009

/S/ WILLIAM C. MCCARTNEY

William C. McCartney

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)

February 27, 2009

/S/ ROBERT L. AYERS

Robert L. Ayers

/S/ KENNETT F. BURNES

Kennett F. Burnes

/S/ RICHARD J. CATHCART

Richard J. Cathcart

/S/ TIMOTHY P. HORNE

Timothy P. Horne

/S/ RALPH E. JACKSON, JR.

Ralph E. Jackson, Jr.

Director

February  27, 2009

Director

February  27, 2009

Director

February  27, 2009

Director

February  27, 2009

Director

February  27, 2009

57

Signature

Title

Date

/S/ KENNETH J. MCAVOY

Kenneth J. McAvoy

/S/ JOHN K. MCGILLICUDDY

John K. McGillicuddy

/S/ GORDON W. MORAN

Gordon W. Moran

/S/ DANIEL J. MURPHY, III

Daniel J. Murphy, III

Director

February  27, 2009

Director

February  27, 2009

Chairman of the Board

February 27, 2009

Director

February  27, 2009

58

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.:

We  have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Watts  Water Technologies, Inc.

and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the  related  consolidated statements  of
operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year period ended
December 31, 2008. In connection with  our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have
also audited the financial statement schedule. These consolidated  financial  statements and  financial
statement schedule are the responsibility of  the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated  financial statements  and financial  statement  schedule  based
on our audits.

We  conducted our audits in accordance with the standards  of  the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those  standards require that we  plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether  the  financial  statements are free  of material misstatement.  An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence  supporting the amounts and disclosures  in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting  principles used  and significant
estimates made by management, as well as  evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable  basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,  in all
material respects, the financial position of  Watts  Water Technologies, Inc. and  subsidiaries  as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations  and their  cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the financial statement  schedule, when considered  in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in  all  material
respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the
recognition and disclosure provisions of  Statement of Financial Accounting Standards  No. 158,
Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and  Other Postretirement  Plans—an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and  132(R) effective December 31, 2006 and its measurement date
provisions on January 1, 2007.

Also, as discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income  Taxes—an  interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 effective January 1, 2007.

We  also have audited, in accordance with the standards of  the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), Watts  Water Technologies, Inc.’s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based  on criteria established  in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring  Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO), and our report dated February  27, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion  on the effectiveness
of the Company’s internal control over  financial reporting.

Boston, Massachusetts
February 27, 2009

59

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Amounts in millions, except per share  information)

Years Ended December 31,

2008

2007

2006

Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,459.4
971.0

$1,382.3
920.7

$1,230.8
805.8

GROSS PROFIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring and other (income) charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill impairment charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

OPERATING INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other (income) expense:

Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minority interest
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME
TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from discontinued operations, net  of taxes  of $0.4 in  2008, $0.2 in
2007 and $2.1 in 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

488.4
360.2
5.6
22.0

100.6

(5.1)
26.2
(1.9)
9.1

28.3

72.3
25.0

47.3

461.6
332.7
3.2
—

125.7

(14.5)
26.9
(2.8)
2.3

11.9

113.8
36.2

77.6

425.0
300.2
(5.7)
—

130.5

(5.0)
22.1
(1.8)
(.9)

14.4

116.1
39.0

77.1

(0.7)

(0.2)

(3.4)

NET INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

46.6

$

77.4

$

73.7

Basic EPS
Income (loss) per share:

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NET INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted average number of shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted EPS
Income (loss) per share:

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NET INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted average number of shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Dividends per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

$

$

$

$

1.29
(0.02)

1.27

36.6

1.28
(0.02)

1.26

36.8

0.44

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

2.01
(0.01)

2.00

38.6

1.99
(0.01)

1.99

39.0

2.32
(0.10)

2.21

33.3

2.29
(0.10)

2.19

33.7

$

0.40

$

0.36

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial  statements.

60

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Amounts in millions, except share information)

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts  of $12.2 million
in 2008 and $14.9  million in 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets  of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total Current Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER ASSETS:

Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

$ 165.6
—

$ 290.3
22.0

221.3
339.0
14.6
47.5
11.6

799.6
237.4

431.3
8.3
174.6
8.9

235.7
341.6
18.6
38.1
10.4

956.7
223.7

385.8
17.0
134.0
12.1

TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,660.1

$1,729.3

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:

Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued compensation and benefits
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 115.2
103.9
41.6
4.5
29.7

$ 108.0
113.6
38.2
1.3
28.6

Total Current Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LONG-TERM DEBT, NET OF CURRENT  PORTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MINORITY INTEREST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

Preferred Stock, $0.10 par value; 5,000,000  shares authorized;  no shares issued

or outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Class A Common Stock, $0.10 par value; 80,000,000 shares  authorized; 1 vote
per  share; issued and outstanding, 29,250,175 shares in  2008 and 30,600,056
shares in 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Class B Common Stock, $0.10 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized;  10 votes
per  share; issued and outstanding, 7,293,880 shares in  2008 and in 2007 . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

294.9
409.8
42.4
70.6
—

—

2.9

0.7
386.9
451.7
0.2

842.4

289.7
432.2
42.9
45.6
3.4

—

3.1

0.7
377.6
465.4
68.7

915.5

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’  EQUITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,660.1

$1,729.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial  statements.

61

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’  Equity

(Amounts in millions, except share information)

Balance at December 31, 2005 . . . . . . . . . 25,205,210

$ 2.5

7,343,880

$ .7

$142.7

$368.3

$ 5.3

$519.5

Class A
Common Stock

Class B
Common Stock

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

Accumulated
Other

Total

Retained Comprehensive Stockholders’
Earnings

Income  (Loss)

Equity

Comprehensive income:

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cumulative translation adjustment and

other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pension plan additional liability, net of

tax of $0.6 million . . . . . . . . . . . .

Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . .

Initial impact upon adoption of FAS  158,

net of tax of ($3.8m) . . . . . . . . . . . .

Shares of Class A Common Stock issued

upon the exercise of stock options . . . .
Tax benefit for stock options exercised . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . .
Shares of Class B Common Stock

converted to Class A Common Stock . .

Issuance of shares of restricted Class A

Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .

Net change in restricted stock units
Shares of Class A Common Stock issued
in Stock Offering, net of offering costs
of $11.4 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common Stock dividends . . . . . . . . . . .

106,499

—

50,000

59,008
68,394

—

—
—

5,750,000

0.6

(50,000) —

1.9
1.4
3.0

—
0.8

218.0

(12.4)

73.7

25.0

0.9

73.7

25.0

0.9

99.6

(5.8)

(5.8)

Balance at December 31, 2006 . . . . . . . . . 31,239,111

$ 3.1

7,293,880

$0.7

$367.8

$429.6

$ 25.4

Comprehensive income:

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cumulative translation adjustment and

other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pension plan gain arising during the

year, net of tax of $3.0 million . . . . .

Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . .

Impact upon adoption of measurement

date provisions of FAS158 . . . . . . . . .

Shares of Class A Common Stock issued

upon the exercise of stock options . . . .
Tax  benefit for stock awards exercised . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of shares of restricted Class  A

Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .

Net change in restricted stock units
Repurchase and retirement of Class  A

Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common Stock dividends . . . . . . . . . . .

66,658

—

58,726
109,977

(874,416)

—
—

—

39.1

4.2

77.4

(0.8)

(25.2)
(15.6)

1.1
1.0
6.0

—
1.7

Balance at December 31, 2007 . . . . . . . . . 30,600,056

Comprehensive income:

$ 3.1

7,293,880

$0.7

$377.6

$465.4

$ 68.7

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cumulative translation adjustment and

other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pension plan loss arising during the

year, net of tax of  $9.7 million . . . . .

Comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Shares of Class A Common Stock issued

upon the exercise of stock options . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of shares of restricted Class A

Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change in restricted stock units . . . .
Repurchase and retirement of Class A

Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common Stock dividends . . . . . . . . . . .

85,512

73,542
109,689

(1,618,624)

(0.2)

46.6

(51.8)

(16.7)

1.6
5.3

2.4

(44.1)
(16.2)

Balance at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . 29,250,175

$ 2.9

7,293,880

$0.7

$386.9

$451.7

$ 0.2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial  statements.

62

1.9
1.4
3.0

—

—
0.8

218.6
(12.4)

$826.6

77.4

39.1

4.2

120.7

(0.8)

1.1
1.0
6.0

—
1.7

(25.2)
(15.6)

$915.5

46.6

(51.8)

(16.7)

(21.9)

1.6
5.3

2.4

(44.3)
(16.2)

$842.4

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December  31,

2008

2007

2006

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: loss from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 46.6
(0.7)

$ 77.4
(0.2)

Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash provided by continuing

47.3

77.6

operating activities:

Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Gain) loss on disposal and impairment of goodwill,  property, plant and  equipment and

other

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income tax benefit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of  effects from business acquisitions and

divestures:
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other  liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net cash provided by continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Additions to property, plant and equipment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments in securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

FINANCING  ACTIVITIES

Proceeds from long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment of  capital leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from share transactions under employee  stock plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefit of stock awards exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt issue costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from stock offering, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments to  repurchase common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued  operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

31.8
13.3

24.0
5.3
(18.7)

24.8
14.1
8.3
(3.8)

146.4

(26.6)
1.1
(2.7)
33.3
—
(177.3)

(172.2)

22.9
(54.9)
(1.3)
1.6
—
—
—
(44.5)
(16.2)

(92.4)

(5.9)
(0.6)

28.9
10.5

2.0
6.0
(8.2)

6.5
(8.1)
(1.2)
(22.3)

91.7

(37.8)
0.6
(27.5)
0.4
(0.5)
(22.6)

43.8
(71.5)
(1.7)
1.1
1.0
—
—
(23.6)
(15.6)

(66.5)

9.4
0.1

73.7
(3.4)

77.1

26.7
8.6

(8.3)
3.0
(2.1)

(17.0)
(37.3)
2.0
30.3

83.0

(44.7)
31.9
(11.8)
—
(1.2)
(93.4)

356.6
(228.3)
(4.1)
1.9
1.4
(2.4)
218.6
—
(12.4)

331.3

1.2
0.9

297.2
45.8

(87.4)

(119.2)

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and  cash  equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(124.7)
290.3

(52.7)
343.0

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 165.6

$290.3

$343.0

NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Acquisition  of businesses:
Fair  value of  assets acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash paid, net  of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 231.5
176.8

$ 23.7
22.7

Liabilities assumed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 54.7

$

Acquisitions of  property, plant and equipment under capital  lease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

— $

Issuance  of stock under management stock purchase plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

1.6

$

Liability for shares repurchased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ — $

1.0

1.4

1.7

1.4

$161.5
93.4

$ 68.1

$ 16.0

$

0.8

$ —

Retirement  of variable rate demand bonds with cash collateral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ — $ — $ (8.9)

CASH PAID FOR:

Interest

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 26.9

$ 27.1

$ 21.7

Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 45.1

$ 48.0

$ 35.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial  statements.

63

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) Description of Business

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (the Company) designs, manufactures and sells  an extensive line of
water safety and flow control products  primarily for  the water quality, water conservation, water  safety
and water flow control markets located  predominantly in  North America, Europe,  and China.

(2) Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts  of the Company  and its majority  and
wholly owned subsidiaries. Upon consolidation, all significant  intercompany accounts and  transactions
are eliminated.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments  with maturities of three months  or less at  the

date  of  original issuance.

Investment Securities

Investment securities at December 31, 2008 and 2007 consisted  of auction rate securities (ARS)

whose underlying investments were in municipal bonds  and student loans and,  in 2008, investments in
rights issued by UBS. The securities  were purchased at  par value.  The rights  issued by UBS were
received in connection with a settlement agreement. See Note 16 for  additional information regarding
the rights issued by UBS. At December 31, 2008, the  Company classified its debt securities  and
investment in rights from UBS as trading securities.

Trading securities are recorded at fair value.  The Company  determines the  fair value  by  obtaining
market value when available from quoted prices in  active markets.  In the absence of quoted  prices, the
Company uses other inputs to determine the fair value  of  the investments. All  changes in the fair value
as well as any realized gains and losses from the sale of the  securities are  recorded when  incurred to
the Consolidated Statements of Operations as other income  or expense.

At December 31, 2007, the Company had classified the ARS  as available-for-sale and recorded the

ARS at fair value.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Allowance for doubtful accounts includes reserves for bad debts and sales  returns and  allowances.
The Company analyzes the aging of accounts receivable,  individual accounts receivable,  historical bad
debts, concentration of receivables by customer, customer credit worthiness, current  economic trends
and changes in customer payment terms. The Company specifically analyzes individual accounts
receivable and establishes specific reserves against financially troubled  customers.  In addition, factors
are developed in certain regions utilizing  historical  trends of sales and returns and allowances  to  derive
a reserve for returns and allowances.

Concentration of Credit

The Company sells products to a diversified customer base and, therefore, has no significant

concentrations of credit risk, except that approximately  10.0% of the Company’s total sales in 2006
were to one customer. These sales were transacted within  the North  America geographic segment. In
2008 and 2007, no one customer accounted for 10.0% or  more of the Company’s total sales.

64

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of  cost (using primarily the first-in, first-out method) or market.
Market value is determined by replacement  cost or net  realizable value. Historical experience is  used as
the basis for determining the reserve for excess or obsolete inventories.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill is recorded when the consideration  paid for  acquisitions exceeds  the fair value of net
tangible and intangible assets acquired.  Goodwill and  other intangible assets with indefinite useful  lives
are not amortized, but rather are tested annually for impairment. The test was performed as of
October 26, 2008.

Impairment of Goodwill and Long-Lived  Assets

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives  are tested annually for impairment in

accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards  Board Statement No.  142 ‘‘Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets’’ (FAS 142). The Company’s impairment  review is based on  a discounted
cash flow approach at the reporting unit level that requires management judgment with respect  to
revenue and expense growth rates, changes  in working capital and  the selection and use of an
appropriate discount rate. The Company  uses its judgment in assessing whether  assets may have
become  impaired between annual impairment tests. Indicators such as  unexpected adverse business
conditions, economic factors, unanticipated technological change or competitive  activities, loss of key
personnel and acts by governments and courts, may signal that an  asset  has become impaired.

Intangible assets with estimable lives  and other long-lived  assets are reviewed for  impairment

whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that  the  carrying amount of an  asset or asset
group may not be recoverable in accordance with Financial Accounting  Standards Board Statement
No. 144, ‘‘Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets’’ (FAS 144). Recoverability
of intangible assets with estimable lives  and other long-lived assets  is measured  by  a comparison of the
carrying  amount of an asset or asset  group to future net undiscounted pretax  cash flows expected to be
generated by the asset or asset group. If  these comparisons indicate that an asset  is not recoverable, the
impairment loss recognized is the amount by which  the carrying amount of  the asset or asset group
exceeds the related estimated fair value. Estimated fair value is based  on either  discounted future
pretax operating cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature  of  the asset. The Company
determines the discount rate for this analysis based on the expected internal rate of return for the
related business and does not allocate  interest charges to the asset or asset group  being  measured.
Judgment is required to estimate future operating cash  flows.

As a result of the recent economic downturn  and  other  business  developments, goodwill in the
Company’s Water Quality reporting unit was impaired during the fourth quarter of 2008.  The  Water
Quality reporting unit includes a number of businesses that were purchased  over time.  Most  recently,
the Company acquired substantially all  the assets of Topway  Global Inc. (Topway) in November 2007.
With the recent decline in commercial  and residential  projects and threatened legislation  in the state of
California against water softeners, a principal market for Topway,  sales declined  from prior year levels
and from the Company’s expectations. Although  the Company continues  to see positive results  from
other businesses within the Water Quality reporting unit,  the decline in sales in  the fourth  quarter  of
2008 coupled with the current economic  outlook  negatively impacted the expected cash flows of the
reporting unit. The Company completed  an assessment of the fair  value of the  net assets of  the

65

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

reporting unit and recorded a pre-tax  impairment of $22.0 million in  the fourth  quarter  of 2008. The
Company estimated the fair value of  the  reporting  unit using the expected present value  of future cash
flows.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill  are as follows:

Carrying amount at December 31, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill acquired during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to goodwill during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of change in exchange rates used  for translation . . . . . . . . . .

Carrying amount at December 31, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill acquired during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to goodwill during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill impairment charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of change in exchange rates used  for translation . . . . . . . . . .

North
America

$198.9
7.6
3.8
0.7

$211.0
—
0.4
(22.0)
(1.1)

Europe

China

Total

(in millions)

$147.9
—
1.1
13.4

$ 9.3
—
2.4
0.7

$356.1
7.6
7.3
14.8

$162.4
89.5

$12.4
3.3
— (2.6)
—
(22.9)

$385.8
92.8
(2.2)
— (22.0)
(23.1)
0.9

Carrying amount at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$188.3

$229.0

$14.0

$431.3

The adjustments to North American goodwill during the  year ended December  31, 2008 relate to

approximately $0.4 million for an earn-out provision. The adjustment to China goodwill during the year
ended December 31, 2008 includes the write-off of goodwill  relating  to  the disposition of  Tianjin
Tanggu  Watts Valve Company, Ltd. (TWT) and  the finalization of the  Changsha Valve Works  purchase
price allocation.

The adjustments to North American goodwill during the  year ended December  31, 2007 relate to
an accrual of approximately $3.8 million in  earn-out provisions.  The adjustment to European goodwill
during the year ended December 31, 2007 includes the finalization of the ATS  Expansion Group
purchase price allocation. ATS Expansion Group was acquired  in May  2006. The adjustment  to  China
goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2007 includes the finalization of the  Changsha Valve
Works purchase price allocation. Changsha  Valve Works was acquired in  April 2006.

Intangible assets include the following:

December 31,

2008

2007

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Patents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total amortizable intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Intangible assets not subject to amortization . . . . . . . . . .

$ 18.0
109.7
7.5
19.1

154.3

62.0

(in millions)

$ (7.3)
(24.6)
(3.3)
(6.5)

(41.7)

—

$ 13.8
70.0
7.5
19.0

110.3

52.2

$ (6.1)
(14.3)
(2.3)
(5.8)

(28.5)

—

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$216.3

$(41.7)

$162.5

$(28.5)

66

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

Aggregate amortization expense for amortized intangible  assets for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006 was $13.3 million, $10.5 million and $8.6  million, respectively. Additionally, future
amortization expense on amortizable  intangible assets approximates  $14.4 million  for 2009,
$14.2 million for 2010, $14.0 million for  2011,  $12.5 million for  2012 and  $11.3 million for 2013.
Amortization expense is provided on  a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the
intangible assets. The weighted-average  remaining life  of  total  amortizable intangible assets  is
10.8 years. Patents, customer relationships, technology and other  amortizable intangibles  have weighted-
average remaining lives of 8.2 years,  10.2 years, 5.2  years  and 19.1  years, respectively.  Intangible assets
not subject to amortization primarily  include trademarks  and unpatented  technology.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 10 to  40 years for buildings and
improvements and 3 to 15 years for machinery  and  equipment.

Taxes, Other than Income Taxes

Taxes assessed by governmental authorities on  sale transactions  are  recorded  on a  net basis and

excluded from sales, in the Company’s  consolidated statements of operations.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under  the asset and liability method. Deferred tax  assets and

liabilities are recognized for the future tax  consequences attributable  to  differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of  existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and
operating loss and tax credit carry forwards.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are  measured using
enacted  tax rates expected to apply to  taxable income in  the years in which those  temporary  differences
are expected to be recovered or settled.  The  effect on  deferred tax assets and liabilities of a  change in
tax rates is recognized in income in the period  that includes the enactment date.

On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Interpretation No. 48,
‘‘Accounting for Uncertainty in Income  Taxes’’  (FIN  48).  The  purpose of FIN 48 is to increase  the
comparability in financial reporting of income  taxes. FIN 48  requires that in order for a tax benefit to
be booked in the income statement,  the item in question  must meet the more-likely-than-not  (greater
than 50% likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the  taxing authorities) threshold. The
adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on  the Company’s financial statements. No
cumulative effect was booked through  beginning  retained  earnings.

During  2008, the Company reduced its unrecognized tax  benefits by approximately $2.2 million as
a result of finalizing federal and state income tax audits.  The Company  estimates that it is reasonably
possible that a portion of the currently  remaining  unrecognized tax benefit may  be  recognized by the
end of 2009 as a result of the conclusion of the federal income tax  audit. The amount of  expense
accrued for penalties and interest is $1.1 million worldwide.

As of December 31, 2008, the Company had gross unrecognized  tax benefits  of approximately
$2.3 million of which, approximately $1.9 million,  if recognized,  would affect the  effective tax  rate. The
difference between the amount of unrecognized tax benefits  and the amount that would impact the
effective tax rate consists of the federal tax benefit of state  income tax items. A reconciliation  of the

67

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits and a separate analysis  of  accrued interest
related to the unrecognized tax benefits  is  as follows:

Balance at January 1, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increases related to prior year tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decreases related to prior year tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increases related to current year tax  positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decreases related to statute expirations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(in millions)

$ 3.7
0.9
(1.6)
—
(0.1)
(0.6)

$ 2.3

The Company is currently under audit by the Internal  Revenue Service for the  2005 and  2006 tax

years. The expected completion date  for this  audit  is November 2009.  The Company  does not
anticipate any significant adjustments at this time. Watts conducts  business  in a variety of locations
throughout the world resulting in tax  filings in numerous domestic and foreign  jurisdictions. The
Company is subject to tax examinations  regularly  as part of the normal course of business. The
Company’s major jurisdictions are the  U.S., Canada, China, Netherlands, U.K., Germany, Italy  and
France. With few exceptions the Company is no longer subject to U.S.  federal, state and local, or
non-U.S.  income tax examinations for years before 2003.

The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component

of income tax expense.

The statute of limitations in our major jurisdictions is open  in the U.S. for the year 2005 and later;

in Canada for 2004 and later; and in the  Netherlands  for 2004 and later.

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial statements of subsidiaries located outside  the United States  generally are measured

using the local currency as the functional  currency. Balance sheet accounts, including goodwill, of
foreign subsidiaries are translated into United  States  dollars at year-end  exchange rates. Income and
expense items are translated at weighted average exchange rates for  each period. Net translation gains
or losses are included in other comprehensive  income, a separate component of stockholders’ equity.
The Company does not provide for U.S. income taxes on foreign currency translation adjustments since
it does not provide for such taxes on undistributed  earnings of foreign  subsidiaries.  Gains and  losses
from foreign currency transactions of  these subsidiaries  are included in net  earnings.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Financial Accounting  Standards Board Statement

No. 123R, ‘‘Share-Based Payment’’(FAS  123R) utilizing the ‘‘modified prospective’’  method as
described in FAS 123R. Under the ‘‘modified prospective’’ method,  compensation cost is recognized  for
all share-based payments granted after  the  effective date  and for all unvested  awards granted prior to
the effective date. In accordance with FAS 123R, prior  period amounts  were not restated. FAS 123R
also requires the excess tax benefits associated  with these share-based payments to be classified as
financing activities in the Statements of Consolidated Cash  Flows, rather than as operating cash flows
as required under previous regulations.

68

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

At December 31, 2008, the Company had three stock-based compensation plans with total

unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock-based compensation arrangements of
approximately $7.6 million and a total weighted average remaining term  of 2.1 years. For 2008, 2007
and 2006 the Company recognized compensation costs related to stock-based  programs of
approximately $5.3 million, $6.0 million and $3.0 million respectively, in selling,  general and
administrative expenses. The Company  recorded approximately $0.7 million, $0.7 million and
$0.4 million of tax benefit during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, for the compensation expense
relating to its stock options. For 2008, 2007 and 2006,  the Company recorded  approximately
$1.1 million, $1.3 million and $0.6 million respectively,  of tax benefit for its other stock-based plans.
For 2008, 2007 and 2006, the recognition  of total stock-based compensation expense  impacted  both
basic and diluted net income per common share by $0.10,  $0.10 and $0.06, respectively.

Net Income Per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is calculated  by  dividing net  income by  the weighted average

number of common shares outstanding. The calculation of diluted  income per share assumes  the
conversion of all dilutive securities (see  Note 13).

Net income and number of shares used to compute net income per share,  basic and assuming full

dilution, are reconciled below:

Years Ended December 31,

2008

2007

2006

Per
Share
Income Shares Amount Income Shares Amount Income Shares Amount

Per
Share

Per
Share

Net

Net

Net

Basic EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $46.6
Dilutive securities principally

(Amounts in millions, except per share information)
38.6

$ 1.27

$ 2.00

$73.7

$77.4

33.3

36.6

$ 2.21

common stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . .

— 0.2

(0.1)

— 0.4

(0.01)

— 0.4

(0.02)

Diluted EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $46.6

36.8

$ 1.26

$77.4

39.0

$ 1.99

$73.7

33.7

$ 2.19

The computation of diluted net income per share for the years ended December 31,  2008 and  2007

excludes the effect of the potential exercise  of options  to  purchase approximately  1.0 million and
0.5 million shares, respectively, because the exercise price of the option  was greater  than the  average
market price of the Class A Common  Stock,  as the effect would have been  anti-dilutive.

During  the year ended December 31, 2008,  the Company repurchased  approximately 1.6 million

shares of its Class A Common Stock.

Derivative Financial Instruments

In the normal course of business, the  Company manages risks associated  with commodity  prices,
foreign exchange rates and interest rates through a variety of strategies, including the use  of hedging
transactions, executed in accordance  with the Company’s policies. The Company’s  hedging transactions
include, but are not limited to, the use  of various derivative  financial and commodity instruments.  As a
matter of policy, the Company does not use derivative instruments  unless there is an  underlying
exposure. Any change in value of the derivative instruments would be substantially offset  by  an

69

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

opposite change in the value of the underlying  hedged items.  The Company does not use  derivative
instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Using qualifying criteria defined in Financial  Accounting Standards Board Statement  No. 133,
‘‘Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities’’ (FAS  133), derivative instruments are
designated and accounted for as either a hedge of a  recognized asset or liability (fair value hedge) or a
hedge of a forecasted transaction (cash flow  hedge). For a fair value hedge, both  the effective and
ineffective portions of the change in fair  value of the  derivative instrument, along with an adjustment to
the carrying amount of the hedged item for fair value changes attributable to the hedged  risk, are
recognized in earnings. For a cash flow  hedge, changes in  the fair value  of  the derivative  instrument
that are highly effective are deferred in  accumulated  other comprehensive income or  loss until  the
underlying hedged item is recognized in earnings.

If a  fair value or cash flow hedge were to cease to qualify for  hedge accounting or be terminated,

it would continue to be carried on the balance sheet at fair  value until  settled, but  hedge  accounting
would be discontinued prospectively. If a forecasted transaction  was no longer probable of occurring,
amounts previously deferred in accumulated  other  comprehensive income would  be  recognized
immediately in earnings. On occasion,  the Company may enter into  a  derivative  instrument that does
not qualify for hedge accounting because it  is entered  into  to  offset changes  in the fair  value of  an
underlying transaction which is required to be recognized in earnings (natural hedge). These
instruments are reflected in the Consolidated Balance  Sheets  at  fair value with changes  in fair value
recognized in earnings.

Foreign currency derivatives include forward foreign  exchange contracts primarily for Canadian

dollars. Metal derivatives include commodity  swaps for copper. During 2008,  the Company used  a
copper  swap as a means of hedging exposure  to  metal prices (see Note 16).

Portions of the Company’s outstanding  debt are exposed  to  interest rate risks. The Company

monitors its  interest rate exposures on  an  ongoing basis to maximize the  overall  effectiveness of  its
interest rates. During 2006, the Company  used  an interest  rate  swap as  a  means of hedging  exposure to
interest rate risks. The Company’s interest rate swap did  not  qualify as a  cash flow  hedge under the
criteria of FAS 133. The swap was terminated on October 3, 2006.

Shipping and Handling

Shipping and handling costs included in selling, general and  administrative  expense amounted to
$39.6 million, $39.1 million and $37.3  million for the years ended December 31,  2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.

Research and Development

Research and development costs included in selling, general, and  administrative expense amounted

to $17.5 million, $15.1 million and $12.7  million for the years ended December 31,  2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when all of the  following  criteria have been  met:  the Company
has entered into a binding agreement,  the product has been shipped and  title passes, the sales price to
the customer is fixed or is determinable, and collectability  is reasonably assured. Provisions for

70

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

estimated returns and allowances are made at  the time  of  sale, and are recorded as a  reduction of sales
and included in the allowance for doubtful accounts in  the Consolidated Balance  Sheets. The Company
records provisions for sales incentives (primarily volume  rebates), as an adjustment  to  net sales  in
accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Emerging  Issues Task Force (EITF)
Issue 00-14, ‘‘Accounting for Certain  Sales Incentives’’  (EITF 00-14) and EITF  Issue No  01-9,
‘‘Accounting for Consideration Given  by  a Vendor to a Customer or a  Reseller of the  Vendor’s
Products’’.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements  in conformity with  accounting principles generally accepted

in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the  reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent  assets and  liabilities at  the date  of  the
financial statements and the reported  amounts of revenues and  expenses during  the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.

New Accounting Standards

In June 2008, the Financial Accounting  Standards Board (FASB)  issued FASB Staff Position  (FSP)

EITF Issue No. 03-6-1, ‘‘Determining Whether  Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities’’ (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 requires that unvested
share-based payment awards that contain rights  to  receive non-forfeitable dividends or dividend
equivalents to be included in the two-class  method of computing earnings per share as  described in
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 128, ‘‘Earnings per Share.’’ This  FSP is
effective for financial statements issued  for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those years. Accordingly,  we  will  adopt  FSP EITF  03-6-1 in  fiscal year  2009. The
adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 is not expected to have a material impact  on the  consolidated  financial
statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 162, ‘‘The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Principles,’’
(FAS 162), which identifies the sources  of accounting  principles and the  framework for selecting the
principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are
presented in conformity with generally  accepted accounting principles (GAAP)  in the United States
(the GAAP hierarchy). FAS 162 is effective 60 days  following  the SEC’s  approval of the  Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments  to  AU Section 411, ‘‘The  Meaning of Present
Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.’’ The adoption of FAS 162 is  not
expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No.  FAS 142-3, ‘‘Determination of the Useful  Life of
Intangible Assets.’’ This FSP amends  the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or
extension assumptions used to determine  the useful life  of a recognized intangible asset  under FAS
No. 142, ‘‘Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets’’ (FAS 142). The objective of this FSP is  to  improve
the consistency between the useful life  of a  recognized  intangible asset under FAS 142 and the period
of expected cash flows used to measure the  fair value of the  asset  under  FAS 141(R), and  other
principles of GAAP. This FSP applies to all intangible assets,  whether  acquired in a business
combination or otherwise, and shall be  effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods  within those fiscal years and  applied
prospectively to intangible assets acquired after  the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. The

71

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

adoption of this FSP will not have a  significant impact on  the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161, ‘‘Disclosures about  Derivative  Instruments  and
Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,’’ (FAS 161), which  expands  the current
disclosure requirements of FAS 133, ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Instruments  and Hedging Activities,’’
such that entities must now provide enhanced disclosures  on a quarterly basis  regarding how  and why
the entity uses derivatives; how derivatives and related hedged items are  accounted for  under FAS 133
and how  derivatives and related hedged items affect the entity’s financial position, performance and
cash flow. FAS 161 is effective prospectively for annual and  interim periods  beginning  on or  after
November 15, 2008. Accordingly, the Company will adopt FAS 161  in 2009.

In December 2007, the FASB issued  FAS No. 141 (R),’’ Business Combinations,’’ (FAS  141R),
which  requires most identifiable assets,  liabilities, non-controlling interests, and goodwill acquired in a
business combination to be recorded at ‘‘full fair  value.’’ Under FAS 141R, all business combinations
will be accounted for under the acquisition  method. Significant changes,  among others,  from current
guidance resulting from FAS 141R includes the requirement that contingent assets and  liabilities  and
contingent consideration shall be recorded  at estimated fair value as of  the  acquisition  date, with any
subsequent changes in fair value charged  or  credited to earnings.  Further, acquisition-related costs  will
be expensed rather than treated as part  of the  acquisition.  FAS 141R is  effective for periods beginning
on or after December 15, 2008. The  Company expects the adoption of FAS 141R will increase  costs
charged to its operations for acquisitions  made after January 1, 2009.

In December 2007, the FASB issued  FAS No. 160, ‘‘Non-controlling  Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an amendment  of  ARB  NO. 151,’’ (FAS 160), which  requires non-controlling
interests (previously referred to as minority interest) to be treated as a separate component of equity,
not outside of equity as is current practice.  FAS  160 applies  to  non-controlling interests and
transactions with non-controlling interest  holders in consolidated financial statements.  FAS  160 is
effective for periods beginning on or  after December 15, 2008.  The Company does not expect  the
adoption of FAS 160 will have a material  impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS  No. 159, ‘‘The Fair  Value Option for  Financial Assets and

Financial Liabilities—including an Amendment to FAS No.  115,’’ (FAS  159), which permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain  other  items at fair  value. FAS 159 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after  November 15, 2007  and interim periods
within those fiscal  years. Earlier application is  encouraged. The Company has elected not to measure
its  eligible financial instruments at fair  value and therefore the adoption of FAS 159 did  not  have an
impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No.  157, ‘‘Fair  Value Measurements,’’  (FAS 157), which
defines fair value, establishes guidelines  for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair
value measurements. FAS 157 does not  require any  new  fair value measurements but rather eliminates
inconsistencies in guidance found in various  prior accounting pronouncements and was effective for
fiscal years beginning after November  15, 2007.  In February 2008,  the FASB issued  FASB FSP 157-2
which  delayed the effective date of FAS 157  for all  nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
except those that are recognized or disclosed at  fair value in  the financial statements on  a recurring
basis (at least annually), until fiscal years  beginning after November 15, 2008,  and interim  periods
within those fiscal  years. These nonfinancial items include  assets and liabilities  such as  reporting units
measured at fair value in a goodwill  impairment test and nonfinancial  assets acquired and liabilities

72

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

assumed in a business combination. Effective  January 1,  2008,  the Company  adopted FAS 157 for
financial assets and liabilities recognized  at fair value on  a recurring basis. The  partial adoption of
FAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial position, results  of  operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange  Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 108, ‘‘Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying  Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements’’ (SAB 108), which  provides  interpretive guidance on how the
effects of the carryover or reversal of  prior year misstatements should be  considered in quantifying a
current year misstatement. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending  after November  15, 2006. The
Company adopted the provisions of SAB  108 for fiscal year 2006 and the  impact  of  SAB  108 was not
material to its consolidated financial  statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No.  158, ‘‘Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit

Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of  FASB Statements No.  87, 88, 106, and
132(R),’’ (FAS 158), which requires an  employer  to: (a) recognize in  its  statement of financial position
an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a  liability  for a  plan’s underfunded status; (b) measure a
plan’s assets and its obligations that determine  its  funded status as of the end of  the employer’s  fiscal
year; and (c) recognize changes in the  funded status of a  defined  benefit  postretirement plan in the
year in which the changes occur. Those changes  are reported in other comprehensive income. The
requirement to recognize the funded status  of a benefit plan and the disclosure  requirements are
effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006 for companies with publicly
traded equity securities. The requirement to measure plan  assets and  benefit obligations  as of the date
of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement  of  financial position  is effective for fiscal years ending  after
December 15, 2008, although earlier  adoption is permitted. As a result of the  requirement to recognize
the funded status of the Company benefit plans as of December 31, 2006, the Company recorded an
increase in its pension liability of approximately $8.3  million, a decrease of approximately $1.3 million
in other assets: other, net and a decrease in  accumulated other comprehensive income of approximately
$5.8 million, net of tax. The Company  has early-adopted the measurement date  provisions of FAS 158
effective January 1, 2007. The Company’s  pension plans previously used a September  30 measurement
date.  All plans are now measured as  of December 31, consistent  with the  Company’s fiscal year end.
The non-cash effect of the adoption  of  the measurement date provisions of FAS 158 was not material
and there was no effect on the Company’s results of operations.

In July 2006, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 48, ‘‘Accounting  for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes,’’ (FIN 48), which clarifies  the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes  recognized in
the financial statements in accordance  with SFAS  No. 109, ‘‘Accounting  for  Income Taxes.’’ FIN 48
provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is  more likely
than not that the position will be sustained upon  examination,  based on the technical merits. This
interpretation also provides guidance  on measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN  48 was effective  for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48  for fiscal  year
2007 and the impact was not material to its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 156 ‘‘Accounting for Servicing of Financial  Assets—an

amendment of FASB Statement No.  140,’’ (FAS 156). FAS 156 amends FAS Statement  No.140,
‘‘Accounting for Transfers and Servicing  of  Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,’’ with
respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing  liabilities.  FAS  156
addresses the recognition and measurement of separately recognized servicing  assets and liabilities and

73

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

provides an approach to simplify efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset) accounting. The  Company
adopted the provisions of FAS 156 for  fiscal year 2007  and the impact was not material to its
consolidated financial statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued FAS  No. 155 ‘‘Accounting  for  Certain Hybrid Financial

Instruments—an amendment of FASB  Statements No. 133 and 140’’ (FAS  155).  FAS 155 amends
FAS 133, ‘‘Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities,’’ and FAS  140, ‘‘Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and  Extinguishments of Liabilities,’’ and allows an entity to remeasure
at fair value a hybrid financial instrument  that  contains an  embedded derivative that otherwise  would
require bifurcation from the host, if the  holder irrevocably elects to account for the whole instrument
on a fair value basis. Subsequent changes in the fair value of  the instrument would  be  recognized in
earnings. The Company adopted the provisions  of  FAS 155 for  fiscal  year 2007 and the impact was not
material to its consolidated financial  statements.

(3) Discontinued Operations

In September 1996, the Company divested its Municipal Water  Group businesses, which included

Henry Pratt, James Jones Company and  Edward Barber and Company  Ltd.  Costs and expenses related
to the Municipal Water Group relate  to  legal and settlement costs associated with  the James  Jones
Litigation (see Note 15).

Condensed operating statements and balance sheets for discontinued operations are summarized

below:

Costs and expenses—Municipal Water Group . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Years Ended
December 31,

2008

2007

2006

(in millions)
$(1.1) $(0.4) $(5.5)

Loss before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(1.1)
0.4

(0.4)
0.2

(5.5)
2.1

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes . . . . . . . . . . .

$(0.7) $(0.2) $(3.4)

Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Assets of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Liabilities of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)

$ 0.8
10.8

$11.6

$29.7

$29.7

$ (0.3)
10.7

$10.4

$28.6

$28.6

The assets and liabilities for 2008 and 2007  primarily relate to reserves  for the  James Jones
Litigation. Statements of Cash Flows amounts for 2008, 2007 and  2006 relate to operating activities.

74

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(4) Restructuring and Other (Income) Charges

During  2007, the Company undertook a  review of certain  product lines and its overall

manufacturing capacity. Based on that  review, the Company  initiated a global  restructuring program
that was approved by the Company’s  Board of Directors on October 30, 2007.  The Company also
discontinued certain product lines. This program is expected to include the shutdown of five
manufacturing facilities and the rightsizing of  a sixth facility, including the relocation of its joint  venture
facility in China that was previously disclosed. The restructuring program  and charges for certain
product  line discontinuances include  pre-tax charges totaling approximately $12.9 million. Charges are
primarily for severance ($4.3 million), relocation  costs ($2.8 million) and  other asset write-downs and
expected net losses on asset disposals ($2.0 million)  and will  result in  the elimination  of  approximately
330 positions worldwide. The product lines that were discontinued and accelerated depreciation
resulted in a pre-tax charge of $4.3 million  during 2007. Total net after-tax  charges  for this program are
expected to be approximately $9.4 million ($4.4 million  non-cash), with costs being incurred through
2010. The Company expects to spend approximately $13.4 million in  capital expenditures  to  consolidate
operations and will fund approximately  $8.0 million of this  amount through  proceeds from  the sale  of
buildings and other assets being disposed  of as part of the  restructuring program. Annual cash savings,
net of tax, are estimated to be $4.5 million, which will  be  fully realized by the second half of 2010.

The following table presents the total estimated pre-tax charges to be incurred for the global
restructuring program and product line discontinuances initiated in 2007 by the Company’s reportable
segments:

Reportable Segment

North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

Spent to Date

(in millions)
$5.8
0.2
2.9

$ 5.7
3.9
3.3

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$12.9

$8.9

For 2008, the Company recorded pre-tax charges of approximately $5.7 million. Pre-tax costs of
$0.3 million recorded in costs of goods sold were primarily  for accelerated depreciation. Pre-tax  costs of
$5.6 million recorded in restructuring and other charges were primarily severance costs,  asset write-
downs, accelerated depreciation related to the  Company’s relocation of  its then  60% owned Chinese
joint venture. The Company also recognized income of $0.2  million  in minority  interest representing
the 40% liability of its Chinese joint venture  partner  in the  restructuring plan.

For 2007, the Company recorded pre-tax charges of approximately $7.5 million. Pre-tax costs of
$4.3 million recorded in costs of goods sold were primarily  for product line discontinuances. Pre-tax
costs of $3.2 million recorded in restructuring and other charges  were primarily  for asset write-downs
related to the Company’s wholly owned Chinese manufacturing plants, accelerated depreciation related
to the Company’s relocation of its then  60% owned  Chinese joint venture and  severance costs  in both
China and North America. The Company  also recognized  income of $0.9 million  in minority  interest
representing the 40% liability of its then Chinese joint venture  partners in the restructuring plan.

For 2006, the Company recorded charges of $4.7 million in  costs of  goods sold primarily for
manufacturing severance costs related to the Company’s relocation  plan for its then 60% owned
Chinese joint venture. The Company recorded  income  of  $5.7  million to restructuring  and other
(income) charges which is primarily comprised of gains  of approximately $8.2 million related to the
sales of buildings in Italy, partially offset  by charges of approximately $2.1 million  for severance costs

75

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(4) Restructuring and Other (Income) Charges  (Continued)

related to the Company’s European restructuring plans and approximately  $0.4 million for  accelerated
amortization related to the Company’s Chinese restructuring  plan. The Company also recognized
income of $1.5 million in minority interest representing the  40%  liability of its then Chinese joint
venture partners.

With respect to the table below, restructuring costs consist primarily of  severance  costs. In 2007,
severance costs were recorded in restructuring  and  other  charges (income) and,  in 2006, were recorded
in cost of goods sold. Asset write-downs  consist primarily of  write-offs of fixed  assets and accelerated
depreciation. Product line discontinuances  consist of inventory  write-offs related to product lines  the
Company has discontinued and are recorded  in cost of  goods sold. Other costs  consist of gains  on sales
of buildings in 2006 and of removal and  shipping costs associated with relocation  of manufacturing
equipment in 2007.

Details of the Company’s manufacturing restructuring plans through December 31,  2008 are as

follows:

Restructuring

Asset write-
downs

Product line

discontinuance Other costs

Minority
interest Total

Balance as of December 31, 2005 . . . . . .
Provisions during 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Utilized during 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance as of December 31, 2006 . . . . . .

Provisions during 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Utilized during 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance as of December 31, 2007 . . . . . .

Provisions during 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Utilized during 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ —
6.7
(2.5)

4.2

0.8
(2.6)

2.4

3.7
(6.1)

$ —
0.5
(0.5)

—

2.8
(2.8)

—

0.6
(0.6)

(in millions)
$ —
—
—

—

3.8
(3.8)

—

—
—

$ —
(8.2)
8.2

—

0.1
(0.1)

—

1.6
(1.6)

$ — $ —
(2.5)
(1.5)
6.7
1.5

— 4.2

(0.9)
0.9

6.6
(8.4)

— 2.4

(0.2)
0.2

5.7
(8.1)

Balance as of December 31, 2008 . . . . . .

$ —

$ —

$ —

$ —

$ — $ —

76

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(5) Business Acquisitions and Disposition

On May 30, 2008, the Company acquired all of the  outstanding stock of Bl¨ucher for approximately

$183.5 million. The purchase price consisted of $170.1 million in  cash and the  assumption of debt of
$13.4 million, net of cash acquired. Bl¨ucher is a leading provider of stainless steel  drainage systems in
Europe to the residential, commercial and  industrial market places and is a worldwide leader  in
providing stainless steel drainage products to the marine industry. Bl¨ucher provides the Company with
a new product platform in Europe while  allowing the Company  to  offer a broader product  line to its
existing customer base. The Company is accounting for the transaction  as a business combination under
FAS No. 141, ‘‘Business Combinations.’’ The Company completed a purchase price  allocation that
resulted in the recognition of $64.5 million in  intangible assets and $89.5  million in  goodwill. Intangible
assets are comprised primarily of customer relationships  and  patents with estimated lives  of  10 years
and trade names with indefinite lives. The consolidated results  of  operations  include the results  of
Bl¨ucher since the acquisition date of May 30, 2008.  Had the  Company completed  the acquisition at  the
beginning of 2007, the net sales, income  from continuing operations and earnings per share from
continuing operations would have been as follows:

Amounts in millions (except per share information) (unaudited)

Twelve Months Ended

December 31,
2008

December 31,
2007

Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic EPS—Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted EPS—Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,500.7
54.3
$
53.6
$
1.47
$
1.46
$

$1,460.2
75.1
$
74.9
$
1.94
$
1.92
$

During  the second quarter of 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of the  remaining 40%
ownership of its joint venture in China, TWT,  for $3.3  million  in cash.  TWT manufactured  products to
support the U.S. operations as well as to sell into  the local China market.  In the  third  quarter  of  2008,
the Company relocated the business supporting the U.S. from TWT into an  existing operation in China.
The Company then entered into an agreement  to  sell TWT.  Under this agreement,  the Company
determined that the risks and rewards of ownership  of TWT were effectively  transferred to the buyer as
of October 18, 2008. The Company further  determined that it  was no  longer the  primary  beneficiary of
the operating results of TWT and therefore  deconsolidated  TWT  as of October 18, 2008.  As the  equity
transfer from the Company to the buyer has not yet been  approved by local authorities, the Company
deferred a $1.1 million gain from the  sale.  Upon final approval of the transfer by Chinese government
authority, the Company expects to recognize  the gain during 2009.  The deferred gain  has been
recorded  as a current liability in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.

On November 9, 2007, the Company acquired the assets  and  business of Topway  located  in Brea,

California for approximately $18.4 million.  The  allocations for  goodwill and  intangible  assets were
approximately $7.6 million and $8.2 million,  respectively. The  amount  recorded as intangible assets is
primarily for customer relationships with an  estimated  useful life of 10 years and trade names with
indefinite lives. Topway manufactures  a  wide variety of water softeners, point-of-entry filter units, and
point-of-use drinking water systems for residential, commercial  and industrial applications.

Certain acquisition agreements from  prior years contain  either an earn-out provision or  a put

feature on the remaining common stock  not  yet purchased by  the Company. In 2008,  the Company
accrued approximately $0.4 million for an earn-out  provision which was charged to goodwill and will be
paid in 2009. In 2007, the Company accrued approximately $3.8 million in earn-out  provisions which

77

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(5) Business Acquisitions and Disposition  (Continued)

were charged to goodwill and paid in  2008. In 2006, the Company  accrued  approximately  $4.0 million
in earn-out provisions which were charged to goodwill  and paid in 2007.  The calculations are typically
based on a multiple of future gross margins or operating earnings as  defined in  the agreements.

(6) Accumulated Other Comprehensive  Income  (Loss)

Accumulated other comprehensive income  (loss)  consist of the following:

Balance December 31, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance December 31, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foreign
Currency
Translation

$ 38.1
39.1

77.2
(51.8)

Balance December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 25.4

Defined Benefit
Pension Plans

(in millions)
$(12.7)
4.2

(8.5)
(16.7)

$(25.2)

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income/(Loss)

$ 25.4
43.3

68.7
(68.5)

$ 0.2

(7) Inventories, net

Inventories consist of the following:

Raw materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Work in process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)

$107.4
44.9
186.7

$108.9
45.7
187.0

$339.0

$341.6

Finished goods of $19.1 million and $20.3  million  as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively,

were consigned.

(8) Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consists  of  the following:

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)

$ 14.9
149.4
293.5
7.6

$ 13.7
132.6
270.5
20.6

465.4
(228.0)

437.4
(213.7)

$ 237.4

$ 223.7

78

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(9) Income Taxes

The significant components of the Company’s  deferred income  tax liabilities and assets  are as

follows:

Deferred income tax liabilities:

Excess tax over book depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Deferred income tax assets:

Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net operating loss carry-forward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventory reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)

$15.9
33.3
8.5

57.7

$15.3
23.5
12.4

51.2

23.8
4.3
10.3
29.1

67.5
(4.7)

62.8

22.0
3.2
13.7
10.7

49.6
(3.2)

46.4

Net deferred tax (assets)/liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 5.1

$ (4.8)

The provision for income taxes from continuing operations is  based on  the following pre-tax

income:

Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Years Ended December 31,

2008

2007

2006

(in millions)
$ 47.6
66.2

$ 49.6
66.5

$113.8

$116.1

$ 0.9
71.4

$72.3

79

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(9) Income Taxes (Continued)

The provision for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the following:

Current tax expense:

Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Deferred tax expense (benefit):

Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Years Ended
December 31,

2008

2007

2006

(in millions)

$ 7.6
24.7
1.9

34.2

$19.2
20.4
4.8

$18.0
20.5
4.1

44.4

42.6

(0.2)
(7.7)
(1.3)

(9.2)

(5.7)
(1.2)
(1.3)

(8.2)

(1.7)
(1.5)
(0.4)

(3.6)

$25.0

$36.2

$39.0

Actual income taxes reported from continuing  operations  are different than  would have been
computed by applying the federal statutory tax rate to income from  continuing  operations before
income taxes. The  reasons for this difference are as follows:

Computed expected federal income expense . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign tax rate differential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Years Ended
December 31,

2008

2007

2006

(in millions)
$39.8
2.3
(7.2)
3.2
—
(1.9)

$25.3
0.4
(8.0)
4.2
3.2
(0.1)

$40.6
2.4
(4.4)
—
—
0.4

$25.0

$36.2

$39.0

At December 31, 2008, the Company has foreign net operating  loss carry forwards of  $16.1 million

for income tax purposes; $6.2 million  of  the losses can be carried forward  indefinitely,  $4.9 million of
the losses expire in 2016, and $5.0 million  expire in  2017. The net operating losses consist of
$5.0 million related to German operations, $1.2  million  to  Austrian operations, and  $9.9 million to
Netherland operations.

At December 31, 2008, the Company had a valuation allowance of $4.7 million for a capital  loss
sustained in the U.S., as management believes it is not more likely than not that the Company  would
use such loss within the applicable carryforward period.  The  entire $3.2 million beginning of year
valuation allowance pertained to TWT,  a  Chinese  subsidiary which was disposed of in 2008.  The
Company does not have a valuation allowance on other deferred tax assets, as management believes
that it is more likely than not that the  Company will  recover the net deferred  tax assets.

80

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(9) Income Taxes (Continued)

Enacted changes in income tax laws  had no  material effect on  the Company in  2008, 2007 or  2006.

Undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign  subsidiaries amounted  to approximately
$312.5 million at December 31, 2008,  $251.6 million at December  31, 2007 and $168.9  million at
December 31, 2006. Those earnings are  considered to be indefinitely reinvested  and, accordingly, no
provision  for U.S. federal and state income taxes  has been recorded  thereon. Upon distribution  of
those earnings, in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company will  be  subject to withholding taxes
payable to the various foreign countries.  Determination  of  the amount of U.S. income tax  liability  that
would be incurred is not practicable because  of  the complexities  associated  with its hypothetical
calculation; however, unrecognized foreign  tax credits may  be  available to  reduce some portion of any
U.S. income tax liability. Withholding taxes of approximately $6.1 million would be payable upon
remittance of all previously unremitted earnings at December 31, 2008.

(10) Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other liabilities consist  of  the following:

Commissions and sales incentives payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued product liability and workers’  compensation . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)

$ 41.2
30.5
28.1
4.1

$ 42.6
26.1
38.5
6.4

$103.9

$113.6

81

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(11) Financing Arrangements

Long-term debt consists of the following:

5.85% notes due April 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.87% notes due May 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.47% notes due May 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$350.0 million Revolving Credit Facility maturing  in April  2011.
Eurocurrency rate loans interest accruing at LIBOR  or Euro
LIBOR plus an applicable percentage  (Euro LIBOR at  0.4%
and 4.7% at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively) At
December 31, 2008, $55.0 million was  for euro based borrowings
and there were no outstanding U.S. borrowings. At
December 31, 2007, $81.8 million were for euro  based
borrowings and there were no outstanding U.S. borrowings.

. . . .
Other—consists primarily of European borrowings (at interest  rates
ranging from 4.1% to 6.0%) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less Current Maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)

$225.0
50.0
75.0

$225.0
50.0
75.0

55.0

81.8

9.3

414.3
4.5

1.7

433.5
1.3

$409.8

$432.2

Principal payments during each of the next five years and thereafter  are due as  follows  (in
millions): 2009—$4.5; 2010—$50.8; 2011—$55.7; 2012—$0.8; 2013—$75.7 and thereafter—$226.8.

The Company maintains letters of credit that guarantee its performance or payment  to  third
parties in accordance with specified terms and  conditions. Amounts outstanding  were approximately
$39.3 million as of December 31, 2008 and  $45.0 million as of December 31,  2007. The Company’s
letters  of credit are primarily associated  with  insurance coverage  and to a lesser  extent foreign
purchases. The Company’s letters of  credit generally expire  within one  year of issuance and are  drawn
down against the revolving credit facility. These  instruments  may  exist or expire without  being  drawn
down. Therefore, they do not necessarily  represent future  cash flow obligations.

On April 27, 2006, the Company completed a private placement  of  $225.0 million of 5.85%  senior

unsecured notes due April 2016 (the 2006  Note Purchase Agreement). The 2006 Note Purchase
Agreement includes operational and  financial covenants, with which  the Company is required  to
comply, including, among others, maintenance of certain financial ratios and  restrictions on additional
indebtedness, liens and dispositions. Events of default under  the 2006 Note Purchase Agreement
include failure to comply with its financial and operational covenants, as well as bankruptcy and other
insolvency events. The Company may, at  its option,  upon notice to the noteholders, prepay  at any time
all or part of the Notes in an amount not less  than $1.0 million  by paying the principal amount plus  a
make-whole amount, which is dependent upon the yield of respective U.S. Treasury Securities. As of
December 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with  all covenants related to the 2006 Note
Purchase Agreement. The payment of interest on the senior unsecured notes is due semi-annually on
April 30th and October 30th of each year. Additionally, the Company  amended its 2003 Note Purchase
Agreement to reflect the existence of  the subsidiary  guarantors  and to substantially  conform certain
provisions of the 2003 Note Purchase  Agreement to the 2006 Note Purchase Agreement.

82

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(11) Financing Arrangements (Continued)

On April 27, 2006, the Company amended  and  restated  its  unsecured revolving credit facility with

a syndicate of banks (as amended, the revolving  credit facility). The revolving credit  facility  provides for
multi-currency unsecured borrowings and stand-by letters of  credit of up to $350.0 million and expires
in April 2011. Borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility  bear interest at a fluctuating
rate per annum equal to an applicable  percentage equal to (i)  in the  case of Eurocurrency rate loans,
the British Bankers Association LIBOR  rate plus an applicable  percentage of 0.625%, which is
determined by reference to the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio and  debt rating,  or (ii)  in the
case of base rate loans and swing line loans, the higher  of (a) the federal funds rate  plus 0.5%  and
(b) the rate of interest in effect for such day as announced  by Bank of America, N.A. as its ‘‘prime
rate.’’ For 2008, the average interest  rate under the revolving credit facility for  euro-based borrowings
was approximately 5.2%. The revolving credit  facility includes operational  and financial covenants
customary for facilities of this type, including, among others, restrictions on additional  indebtedness,
liens and investments and maintenance of certain leverage ratios. As of  December 31, 2008, the
Company was in compliance with all  covenants related to the revolving credit facility; had
$260.0 million of unused and potentially  available credit under  the revolving  credit facility;  had no U.S
dollar denominated debt and $55.0 million of euro-based  borrowings outstanding on its  revolving credit
facility; and had $35.0 million for stand-by letters of credit outstanding on its revolving  credit facility.

On May 15, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of $125.0  million of  senior
unsecured notes consisting of $50.0 million  principal amount of 4.87% senior notes  due  2010 and
$75.0 million principal amount of 5.47%  senior  notes due 2013. The  payment of interest on  the senior
unsecured notes is due semi-annually  on May 15th and  November 15th of each year. The senior
unsecured notes were issued by Watts  Water  Technologies,  Inc.  and are pari passu with the revolving
credit facility. The senior unsecured notes allow the  Company to have  (i) debt senior to the notes in an
amount up to $150.0 million plus 5%  of  stockholders’ equity and (ii) debt pari passu or junior to the
senior unsecured notes to the extent  the Company  maintains compliance  with a 2.0  to  1.0 fixed charge
coverage ratio. The notes include a prepayment provision  which might require  a make-whole payment
to the note holders. Such payment is dependent upon the level of the respective treasuries.  The  notes
include other customary terms and conditions, including events  of  default.

(12) Common Stock

The Class A Common Stock and Class B  Common Stock have equal dividend and  liquidation
rights. Each share of the Company’s  Class A Common Stock  is entitled to  one  vote  on all matters
submitted to stockholders and each share  of  Class  B Common Stock  is entitled  to  ten votes on  all  such
matters. Shares of Class B Common  Stock  are convertible  into  shares  of  Class A Common Stock, on a
one-to-one basis, at the option of the  holder.  As of December 31, 2008, the Company has reserved a
total of 4,340,324 of Class A Common  Stock  for  issuance  under its stock-based compensation plans and
7,293,880 shares for conversion of Class  B Common Stock to Class A Common  Stock.

In November 2007, the Company announced that  its  Board of Directors had  authorized a
repurchase of up to 3,000,000 shares of  its  Class A Common Stock.  As of December 31,  2008, the
Company had repurchased 2.45 million  shares of stock  for a total cost  of  $68.1 million.

(13) Stock-Based Compensation

The Company maintains three stock incentive  plans  under which key employees and outside
directors have been granted incentive stock options (ISOs) and  nonqualified stock  options (NSOs) to
purchase the Company’s Class A Common Stock. Only one plan, the 2004  Stock Incentive Plan, is

83

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(13) Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

currently available for the grant of new  equity  awards. Stock options granted under prior plans became
exercisable over a five-year period at the  rate  of  20% per year and expire ten years after the  date of
grant. Under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, options become  exercisable over a four-year period  at the
rate of 25% per year and expire ten  years after  the grant date. ISOs and NSOs  granted under  the plans
may have exercise prices of not less than 100% and 50%  of  the  fair market value of the Class A
Common Stock on the date of grant,  respectively. The Company’s current  practice  is to grant all
options at fair market value on the grant date. At December 31, 2008, 2,827,218 shares of Class A
Common Stock were authorized for  future grants  of new equity  awards under the Company’s stock
incentive plans.

The Company also grants shares of restricted stock to key employees and non-employee members

of the Company’s Board of Directors  under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, which vest either
immediately or over a three-year period at  the rate  of one-third per year. The restricted stock awards
are amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over  the vesting period.

The Company also has a Management Stock  Purchase Plan that allows  for  the granting of

restricted stock units (RSUs) to key  employees. On an  annual basis,  key  employees may elect to receive
a portion of their annual incentive compensation  in RSUs instead of cash. Each  RSU  provides the key
employee with the right to purchase  a share  of Class  A Common Stock at 67% of  the fair market value
on the date of grant. RSUs vest annually over  a three-year period from the grant  date. An  aggregate of
2,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock may be issued under the Management Stock  Purchase Plan.

2004 Stock Incentive Plan

At December 31, 2008, total unrecognized compensation cost  related to the unvested stock options

was approximately $3.7 million with a  total weighted average  remaining term  of 2.8 years. For 2008,
2007 and 2006, the Company recognized compensation cost of $2.3  million,  $2.7 million and
$1.4 million, respectively, in selling, general and administrative expenses.

The following is a summary of stock  option activity  and  related  information:

Years Ended December 31,

2008

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Options

2007

2006

Intrinsic
Value

Options

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Options

(Options in thousands)

Outstanding at beginning of year . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cancelled/Forfeitures . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,168
202
(68)
(86)

$25.32
29.35
31.68
19.08

Outstanding at end of year . . . . . . .

1,216

$26.07

Exercisable at end of year . . . . . . . .

800

$23.22

$ —

$1.75

1,140
189
(94)
(67)

$23.99
33.36
31.08
17.17

1,089
164
(7)
(106)

$21.70
35.20
34.16
17.61

1,168

$25.32

1,140

$23.99

705

$21.42

566

$19.13

84

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(13) Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic values of exercisable  options were approximately

$1.4 million, representing the total pre-tax  intrinsic value,  based on  the Company’s closing Class A
Common Stock price of $24.97 as of December 31, 2008,  which would  have been received by the
option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. The total intrinsic value  of
options exercised for 2008, 2007 and  2006 was approximately $0.8 million, $1.4 million and $2.2 million,
respectively.

Upon exercise of options, the Company  issues shares of Class  A  Common  Stock.

The following table summarizes information  about options outstanding  at December 31,  2008:

Range of Exercise Prices

$10.56—$14.08 . . . . . . .
$14.09—$17.60 . . . . . . .
$24.64—$28.16 . . . . . . .
$28.17—$31.68 . . . . . . .
$31.69—$35.20 . . . . . . .

Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable

Number
Outstanding

Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
Life (years)

Weighted Average
Exercise
Price

Number
Exercisable

Weighted Average
Exercise
Price

(Options in thousands)

43
337
167
200
469

1,216

2.38
3.91
5.59
9.58
7.48

6.40

$10.99
16.53
25.02
29.35
33.28

$26.07

43
337
167
—
253

800

$10.99
16.53
25.02
29.35
33.04

$23.22

The fair value of each option granted  under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan is estimated on  the date
of grant, using the Black-Scholes-Merton Model, based on the following weighted average  assumptions:

Years Ended
December 31,

2008

2007

2006

Expected life (years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected stock price volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.8

6.0
5.8
35.6% 37.2% 35.9%
1.5% 1.2% 1.0%
3.5% 4.6% 4.9%

The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve at  the time  of  grant for  the

respective expected life of the option.  The expected life (estimated period of time  outstanding) of
options and volatility were calculated  using historical  data. The expected  dividend yield of stock is the
Company’s best estimate of the expected future dividend yield. The  Company applied an estimated
forfeiture rate of 15% for its stock options. These rates  were calculated based  upon historical activity
and are an estimate of granted shares not expected  to  vest. If  actual  forfeitures  differ  from the
expected rates, the Company may be  required to make  additional  adjustments  to  compensation  expense
in future periods.

The above assumptions were used to determine the weighted average grant-date fair value of stock

options of $10.10, $12.75 and $13.50  for the  years  ending December  31, 2008,  2007 and  2006,
respectively.

85

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(13) Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

The following is a summary of unvested restricted stock activity and related information:

Years Ended December 31,

2008

2007

2006

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

Shares

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair  Value

(Shares in thousands)

$34.05
29.35
33.71
32.92

$31.27

73
74
(15)
(43)

89

$33.62
33.21
34.10
31.85

$34.05

Shares

27
60
(1)
(13)

73

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

$26.51
35.27
35.20
26.09

$33.62

Shares

89
80
(7)
(47)

115

Unvested at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeitures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Unvested at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The total fair value of shares vested during  2008, 2007 and 2006 was $1.4  million,  $1.4 million and

$0.4 million, respectively. At December  31, 2008, total unrecognized compensation cost  related to
unvested restricted stock was approximately $2.7  million with a total weighted average remaining term
of 1.5  years. For 2008, 2007 and 2006,  the Company recognized compensation costs of $1.8 million,
$1.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in selling, general  and  administrative expenses.  The
Company applied an estimated forfeiture rate of 10% for restricted stock issued to key employees. The
aggregate intrinsic value of restricted  stock granted and outstanding approximated $2.9 million
representing the total pre-tax intrinsic value  based on the Company’s closing Class A Common Stock
price of $24.97 as of December 31, 2008.

Management Stock Purchase Plan

Total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested  RSUs was approximately $1.2  million at
December 31, 2008 with a total weighted average remaining  term of 1.5 years. For 2008,  2007 and  2006
the Company recognized compensation  cost of $1.2  million, $1.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively,
in selling, general and administrative  expenses. Dividends declared for RSUs, that are  paid to
individuals, that remain unpaid at December  31, 2008  total approximately $0.2 million.

86

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(13) Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

A summary of the Company’s RSUs activity and  related information for  2008 is  shown in the

following table:

Years Ended December 31,

2008

Weighted
Average

RSUs Purchase Price

Intrinsic
Value

2007

Weighted
Average

2006

Weighted
Average

RSUs Purchase  Price RSUs Purchase Price

(RSU’s in thousands)

Outstanding at beginning of

period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cancelled/Forfeitures . . . . . . . . .
Settled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Outstanding at end of period . . .

Vested at end of period . . . . . . .

366
60
(19)
(110)

297

133

$18.98
19.09
23.23
22.06

$21.86

$20.27

347
160
(31)
(110)

366

141

$19.00
25.73
25.03
15.62

$22.45

$18.98

328
87
—
(68)

347

148

$16.02
23.34
—
10.20

$19.00

$15.64

$3.11

$4.70

As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic values of outstanding and vested RSUs were
approximately $0.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively, representing  the total pre-tax intrinsic value,
based on the Company’s closing Class  A  Common  Stock price of $24.97 as of December 31, 2008
which  would have been received by the  RSUs holders had all RSUs  settled as of that date. The total
intrinsic value of RSUs settled for 2008, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $0.7 million, $2.5  million
and $1.4 million, respectively. Upon settlement of RSUs, the Company issues shares of Class A
Common Stock.

The following table summarizes information about RSUs  outstanding at December 31,  2008:

Range of Purchase Prices

$7.04—$10.56 . . . . . . . . . .
$14.08—$17.60 . . . . . . . . .
$17.61—$21.11 . . . . . . . . .
$21.12—$24.64 . . . . . . . . .
$24.65—$25.73 . . . . . . . . .

RSUs Outstanding

RSUs Vested

Number
Outstanding

Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
Life (years)

Weighted Average
Purchase
Price

Number
Vested

Weighted  Average
Purchase
Price

(RSUs in thousands)

$ 9.54
15.50
19.09
23.27
25.73

$21.86

32
7
—
53
41

133

$ 9.54
15.50
—
23.23
25.73

$20.27

32
7
54
80
124

297

2.5
0.2
2.2
0.3
1.2

1.2

87

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(13) Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

The fair value of each share issued under the Management Stock Purchase Plan is  estimated  on

the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes-Merton  Model, based on the following weighted average
assumptions:

Years Ended
December 31,

2008

2007

2006

Expected life (years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected stock price volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.0

3.0
3.0
37.2% 35.3% 25.7%
1.5% 1.0% 1.5%
2.2% 4.8% 4.5%

The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve at  the time  of  grant for  the

respective expected life of the RSU’s. The expected life (estimated period of time  outstanding) of
RSU’s and volatility were calculated using historical  data. The expected  dividend yield of stock is the
Company’s best estimate of the expected future dividend yield. The  Company applied an estimated
forfeiture rate of 10% for its RSUs.  These  rates were calculated based upon historical activity and are
an estimate of granted shares not expected to vest. If  actual forfeitures differ from  the expected  rates,
the Company may be required to make  additional adjustments to compensation expense  in future
periods.

The above assumptions were used to determine the weighted average grant-date fair value of

RSUs granted of $11.44, $16.79 and  $13.60 during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

The Company distributed dividends of $0.44  per  share for 2008,  $0.40 per share for 2007 and $0.36

per  share for 2006 on the Company’s Class  A Common  Stock and  Class  B Common Stock.

(14) Employee Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors funded and unfunded non-contributing defined benefit pension plans that

together cover substantially all of its domestic employees.  Benefits are  based primarily on  years  of
service and employees’ compensation.  The funding policy of the  Company for these  plans is to
contribute an annual amount that does not exceed the maximum  amount  that  can be deducted  for
federal income tax purposes. Beginning  in 2007, the  Company uses a December 31 measurement  date
for its plans. Prior  to 2007, the Company  used a September  30 measurement date for its  plans.

88

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(14) Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

The funded status of the defined benefit plans and amounts recognized in the consolidated balance

sheet are as follows:

Change in projected benefit obligation
Balance at beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Administration cost
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plan change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial loss (gain) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One-time adjustment for measurement  date change . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)

$ 73.4
3.4
(0.8)
0.8
4.7
8.1
(2.5)
—

$ 72.6
3.8
(0.4)
0.1
4.3
(6.0)
(2.3)
1.3

Balance at end of  year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 87.1

$ 73.4

Change in fair value of plan assets
Balance at beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actual (loss) gain on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employer contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Administration cost
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One-time adjustment for measurement  date change . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 58.8
(13.8)
3.2
(0.8)
(2.5)
—

$ 42.6
3.6
7.3
(0.4)
(2.3)
8.0

Fair value of plan assets at end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 44.9

$ 58.8

Funded status at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(42.2) $(14.6)

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet are as follows:

Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncurrent liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)
$ (0.1) $ (0.1)
(42.1)
(14.5)

Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(42.2) $(14.6)

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:

Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prior service cost

Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)

$37.6
2.3

$39.9

$11.2
1.8

$13.0

89

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(14) Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets  are

as follows:

Projected benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value of plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The components of net periodic benefit cost  are as follows:

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)

$87.1
$78.0
$44.9

$73.4
$66.4
$58.8

Service cost—benefits earned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest costs on benefits obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prior service cost amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net actuarial loss amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Curtailment charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Years Ended
December 31,
2007

2006

2008

(in millions)
$ 3.8
4.3
(4.4)
0.2
0.9
0.2

$ 3.4
4.7
(4.9)
0.2
0.4
—

$ 3.5
3.8
(3.5)
0.3
1.2
—

Net periodic benefit cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 3.8

$ 5.0

$ 5.3

The estimated net actuarial loss and  prior service cost  for  the  defined benefit pension  plans that
will be amortized from accumulated other  comprehensive income into net periodic  benefit cost over the
next year are $2.9 million and $0.2 million,  respectively.

Assumptions:

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine  benefit obligations:

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.00% 6.50%
4.00% 4.00%

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine  net periodic benefit costs:

2008

2007

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term rate of return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.00% 5.87% 5.50%
8.50% 8.50% 8.50%
4.00% 4.00% 4.00%

2008

2007

2006

Discount rates are selected based upon  rates  of  return at the measurement date utilizing a bond
matching approach to match the expected benefit cash flows.  In selecting the  expected long-term  rate
of return on assets, the Company considers  the average rate of earnings expected on the  funds invested
or to be invested to provide for the benefits of this plan.  This  includes  considering the  trust’s asset
allocation and the expected returns likely to be earned over the life of the  plan. This basis  is consistent
with the prior year.

90

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(14) Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

Plan  assets:

The weighted average asset allocations by  asset category is as follows:

Asset Category

Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2008

2007

50.3% 64.9%
45.7
4.0

29.8
5.3

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100.0% 100.0%

The Company’s written Retirement Plan Investment Policy sets  forth  the investment policy,
objectives and constraints of the Watts Water  Technologies, Inc. Pension Plan. This  Retirement Plan
Investment Policy,  set forth by the Pension Plan Committee,  defines general investment principles and
directs investment management policy,  addressing  preservation of capital, risk aversion and adherence
to investment discipline. Investment managers are to make a reasonable  effort to control risk and  are
evaluated quarterly against commonly  accepted  benchmarks to ensure  that  the risk  assumed is
commensurate with the given investment style and objectives.

The portfolio is designed to achieve  a balanced return of  current income  and modest growth of
capital, while achieving returns in excess  of the rate of  inflation over the  investment horizon in order to
preserve purchasing power of Plan assets. All Plan assets  are required to be invested  in liquid
securities. Derivative investments are not allowed.

Prohibited investments include, but are not limited to the following: commodities and futures
contracts, private placements, options,  limited partnerships,  venture-capital investments, real  estate
properties, interest-only (IO), principal-only (PO),  and residual  tranche CMOs, and Watts Water
Technologies, Inc. stock.

Prohibited transactions include, but are not limited to the following:  short  selling and margin

transactions.

Allowable assets include: cash equivalents, fixed income securities, equity  securities, mutual  funds,

and GICs.

Specific guidelines regarding allocation of assets are as follows: equities shall comprise between

25% and 75% of the total portfolio, while fixed income shall comprise between  30% and 65%.
Investment performance is monitored  on  a regular  basis and investments  are  re-allocated to stay  within
specific  guidelines. An equity/fixed income allocation of  55%/45% is preferred. The securities of any
one company or government agency  should  not  exceed 10%  of  the total  fund, and no more than  20%
of the total fund should be invested in any one industry. Individual treasury  securities may  represent
50% of the total fund, while the total  allocation to treasury bonds and notes may  represent up to 100%
of the Plan’s aggregate bond position.

91

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(14) Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

Cash flows:

The information related to the Company’s pension funds cash flow  is as follows:

Employer Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefit Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The Company expects to contribute approximately  $6.0 million in 2009.

Expected benefit payments to be paid by the pension plans are as follows:

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)
$3.2
$7.3
$2.5
$2.3

During fiscal year  ending December  31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
During fiscal year  ending December  31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
During fiscal year  ending December  31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
During fiscal year  ending December  31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
During fiscal year  ending December  31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
During fiscal year  ending December  31, 2014  through December 31,

(in millions)

$ 2.9
$ 3.2
$ 3.4
$ 3.6
$ 4.0

2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$27.7

Additionally, substantially all of the Company’s domestic employees are eligible to participate in

certain 401(k) savings plans. Under these  plans,  the Company matches  a  specified percentage  of
employee contributions, subject to certain limitations. The Company’s  match contributions  (included in
selling, general and administrative expense) for  the years ended December 31, 2008,  2007, and 2006
were $0.6 million in each year, respectively. Charges for European pension  plans approximated
$3.3 million, $3.0 million and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31,  2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively. These costs relate to plans  administered by certain European subsidiaries, with benefits
calculated according to government requirements and paid out to employees upon retirement or  change
of employment.

The Company entered into a Supplemental  Compensation Agreement (the Agreement)  with
Timothy P. Horne  on September 1, 1996. Per the Agreement, upon  ceasing to be an employee  of  the
Company, Mr. Horne must make himself available, as  requested by the  Board, to work a minimum  of
300 but not more than 500 hours per  year as a  consultant in return  for certain  annual compensation as
long as he is physically able to do so. If Mr. Horne complies  with the consulting provisions of the
agreement above, he shall receive supplemental compensation  on an  annual basis of $400,000  per  year,
subject to cost of living increases each year, in  exchange  for the  services performed,  as long  as he is
physically able to do so. In the event  of physical disability, subsequent to commencing consulting
services for the Company, Mr. Horne  will  continue to receive  $400,000 annually. The payment for
consulting services provided by Mr. Horne  will be expensed  as incurred by  the Company. Mr. Horne
retired effective December 31, 2002, and  therefore the  Supplemental  Compensation  period began on
January 1, 2003. In accordance with Financial Accounting  Standards  Board Statement No. 106,
‘‘Employers Accounting for Post Retirement  Benefits Other Than  Pensions’’,  the Company will accrue
for the future post-retirement disability  benefits over the  period  from  January 1, 2003, to the time in
which  Mr. Horne becomes physically unable to perform his consulting services (the period  in which the
disability benefits are earned).

92

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(15) Contingencies and Environmental  Remediation

James Jones Litigation

On June 25, 1997, Nora Armenta (the Relator) filed  a civil action  in the California Superior Court
for Los Angeles County (the Armenta  case) against James  Jones Company  (James Jones), Mueller  Co.,
Tyco International (U.S.), and the Company.  The Company  formerly owned  James Jones. The Relator
filed under the qui tam provision of the  California state  False Claims Act, Cal. Govt.  Code  § 12650 et
seq. (California False Claims Act) and generally alleged that James Jones  and the  other  defendants
violated this statute by delivering some  ‘‘defective’’ or  ‘‘non-conforming’’  waterworks parts to municipal
water systems in the State of California. The Relator filed a First  Amended Complaint in November
1998 and a Second Amended Complaint  in December  2000, which  brought the total  number of
plaintiffs to 161. The Complaint further  alleges that  purchased non-conforming James Jones
waterworks parts may leach into public  drinking water elevated  amounts of lead that may create a
public health risk because they were made out of ‘81 bronze alloy  (UNS No. C8440) and contain more
lead than the specified and advertised  ‘85 bronze  alloy (UNS No.  C83600). This contention is based on
the average difference of about 2% lead content between  ‘81 bronze  (6%  to  8% lead) and  ‘85 bronze
(4% to 6% lead) and the assumption  that this  would mean increased consumable  lead in public
drinking  water that could cause a public  health  concern. The Company  believes the  evidence and
discovery  available to date indicates that this is not the  case. In addition,  ‘81 bronze  is used extensively
in municipal and home plumbing systems and is approved  by municipal,  local and national  codes. The
Federal Environmental Protection Agency also defines metal  for pipe fittings with no more  than 8%
lead as ‘‘lead free’’ under Section 1417  of the  Federal Safe Drinking Water  Act.

In this case, the Relator seeks three times an unspecified amount of actual damages and alleges
that the municipalities have suffered  hundreds of millions of dollars  in damages.  She also  seeks civil
penalties of $10,000 for each false claim and alleges  that defendants  are  responsible for tens  of
thousands of false claims. Finally, the  Relator requests an  award of costs of  this action,  including
attorneys’ fees.

In December 1998, the Los Angeles Department of  Water and Power (LADWP)  intervened  in this

case and filed a complaint. The Company settled with the  city of Los Angeles,  by  far the most
significant city, for $7.3 million plus attorneys’  fees.  Co-defendants contributed $2.0 million  toward this
settlement.

In August 2003, an additional settlement payment  was  made for $13.0  million  ($11.0  million from

us and $2.0 million from James Jones),  which  settled the claims of  the three Phase I cities  (Santa
Monica, San Francisco and East Bay Municipal  Utility District) chosen by the Relator as having the
strongest claims to be tried first. In addition to this $13.0 million payment, the  Company was obligated
to pay the Relator’s attorney’s fees.

On June 22, 2005, the Court dismissed the  claims of the Phase  II cities selected for  a second trial

phase (Contra Costa, Corona, Santa  Cruz and  Vallejo). The Court ruled that the Relator and  these
cities were required to show that the cities  had received out  of specification parts which  were related to
specific  invoices and that this showing had  not  been made. Although each  city’s claim is unique, this
ruling is significant for the claims of the  remaining cities, and the Relator appealed. On June  29, 2007,
the appellate court dismissed this appeal. However, this  judgment can be appealed again  at the
conclusion of the entire case. The trial  court has  scheduled a trial on October 6, 2009  for six Phase  III
cities. Litigation is  inherently uncertain, and  the Company is unable  to  predict  the outcome of this case.

On September 15, 2004, the Relator’s attorneys filed a lawsuit in the California Superior Court for
the City of Banning and 42 other cities  and water  districts against James Jones, Watts and Mueller Co.

93

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(15) Contingencies and Environmental  Remediation  (Continued)

based on the same transactions alleged  in  the Armenta case alleging common law fraud.  In
October 2008, the Court dismissed the  claims of 11 cities as time-barred. A  first  phase trial of selected
cities is scheduled for April 13, 2010.  Litigation is inherently uncertain,  and  the Company is unable to
predict the outcome of this case.

On February 14, 2001, after the Company’s insurers had denied coverage for the claims in the

Armenta case, the Company filed a complaint for coverage against its insurers in the California
Superior Court (the coverage case). James Jones  filed  a similar complaint, the  cases were  consolidated,
and the trial court made summary adjudication rulings  that  Zurich must  pay all reasonable defense
costs incurred by the Company and James Jones in the Armenta case since April 23, 1998  as well as
such defense costs  in the future until the  end of the Armenta  case. In August 2004,  the California
Court of Appeal affirmed these rulings,  and, on  December 1,  2004, the  California Supreme  Court
denied Zurich’s appeal of this decision. This denial permanently  established Zurich’s obligation to pay
Armenta defense costs for both the Company and James Jones,  and Zurich is  currently making
payments of incurred Armenta defense  costs. However, as  noted  below, Zurich asserts that the defense
costs paid by it are subject to reimbursement.

On November 22, 2002, the trial court  entered a summary adjudication order that Zurich  must

indemnify and pay the Company and James Jones for amounts paid to settle with the City of Los
Angeles. On August 6, 2004, the trial court made  another summary adjudication ruling that Zurich
must indemnify and pay the Company  and  James Jones for  the $13.0  million paid  to  settle  the claims
of the Phase I cities described above.  Zurich will be able to appeal  these orders  at the end of the
coverage case. Zurich has now made all  of  the payments  required by these indemnity orders.

On February 8, 2006, Zurich filed a motion to set  aside as void the November 22, 2002  and

August 6, 2004 summary adjudication indemnity  payment orders. After  this  motion was denied, Zurich’s
appeal was also denied and the California Supreme Court denied Zurich’s petition  for review.  The
Company is currently unable to predict  the finality of these indemnity payment orders since  Zurich can
also appeal them at the end of the coverage case.

Zurich has asserted that all amounts  paid by it to the Company and  James Jones  are subject to
reimbursement under Deductible Agreements  related to the insurance policies between Zurich and
Watts. The Company believes that the  agreements are unenforceable, that  the Armenta case should be
viewed as one occurrence, and that the  deductible amount should be $0.5 million  per  occurrence if the
agreements are enforceable.

On January 31, 2006, the federal district court  in Chicago, Illinois determined that there are
disputes under all Deductible Agreements in  effect during the period  in which Zurich  issued primary
policies and that the arbitrator could  decide  which agreements would control reimbursement  claims.
The Company appealed this ruling. On  October 20,  2006, the United  States Court of Appeals for  the
Seventh Circuit affirmed that an arbitration panel could decide which deductible agreements between
Zurich and the Company would control  Zurich’s  reimbursement claim.

Based on management’s assessment,  the Company does not believe  that the ultimate outcome  of

the James Jones Litigation will have a material adverse effect  on its liquidity, financial condition or
results of operations. While this assessment  is based  on the facts currently known by the Company,
litigation is inherently uncertain, the  actual liability to us to  resolve  this litigation  fully cannot  be
predicted with any certainty and there exists a reasonable  possibility that  we may ultimately incur losses
in the James Jones Litigation in excess of the amount accrued. The Company intends  to  continue to
contest vigorously all aspects of the James  Jones Litigation.

94

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(15) Contingencies and Environmental  Remediation  (Continued)

Environmental Remediation

The Company has been named as a potentially responsible party with respect to a limited  number

of identified contaminated sites. The  levels  of  contamination vary significantly from site to site as  do
the related levels of remediation efforts. Environmental liabilities are recorded  based on  the most
probable cost, if known, or on the estimated minimum cost of remediation. The Company accrues
estimated environmental liabilities based on assumptions, which  are subject to a  number of  factors and
uncertainties. Circumstances which can  affect the reliability  and precision of these estimates  include
identification of additional sites, environmental regulations, level of cleanup  required, technologies
available, number and financial condition of  other  contributors to remediation and the time period over
which  remediation may occur. The Company recognizes  changes in  estimates as  new remediation
requirements are defined or as new information becomes  available.

Based on the facts currently known to the Company, it does not believe that the  ultimate outcome

of these  matters will have a material  adverse effect on its liquidity, financial condition or results of
operations. Some of its environmental matters are inherently uncertain and there  exists a  possibility
that we may ultimately incur losses from  these matters in excess of the  amount  accrued. However,  the
Company cannot currently estimate the amount of  any such  additional  losses.

Asbestos Litigation

The Company is defending approximately 105  lawsuits in different jurisdictions,  with the greatest
number filed in Mississippi and California state courts, alleging injury or death as a  result of exposure
to asbestos. The complaints in these cases typically  name a large number of defendants  and do  not
identify any particular Watts products  as a source of  asbestos exposure. To date, the  Company has
obtained a dismissal in every case before  it  has reached trial because discovery has failed to yield
evidence of substantial exposure to any  Watts  products. Based on the facts currently known to the
Company, it does not believe that the ultimate outcome of these claims will have a material adverse
effect on its liquidity, financial condition  or results  of  operations.

Other Litigation

Other lawsuits and proceedings or claims,  arising  from the ordinary course of operations, are also

pending or threatened against us. Based on the facts currently known to the Company, it  does not
believe that the ultimate outcome of these other litigation  matters will have  a material adverse effect
on its liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

(16) Financial Instruments

Fair Value

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents,  short-term investments,  trade receivables and

trade payables approximate fair value because of the short maturity  of  these financial instruments.

The fair value of the Company’s 4.87% senior notes due 2010, 5.47% senior notes due 2013 and

5.85% senior notes due 2016 is based on quoted market prices.  The  fair value of the Company’s

95

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(16) Financial Instruments (Continued)

variable rate debt approximates its carrying value. The carrying  amount  and the  estimated fair market
value of the Company’s long-term debt,  including the  current portion,  are as follows:

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)

Carrying amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Estimated fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$414.3
$339.4

$433.5
$424.9

Derivative Instruments

The Company uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts  as an  economic hedge to reduce
the impact of currency fluctuations on certain  anticipated intercompany purchase transactions  that  are
expected to occur during the next twelve months and certain other foreign currency transactions.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses  on the contracts are  recognized  in other  income/expense.
These contracts do not subject the Company  to  significant market risk from exchange movement
because they offset gains and losses on  the related foreign currency denominated transactions. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the fair  value of the contracts were immaterial.

From time to time, the Company enters into swaps or forwards to limit the volatility associated

with the purchase of metals, such as copper. The Company  typically structures the terms  of  these
financial instruments to coincide with purchases made throughout  the year. During  2008, the Company
entered into a series of copper swaps  to  fix the price per pound for  copper from  October 2008  through
September 2009 for one customer. The Company  has determined that these  copper  swaps do  not
qualify for hedge accounting and is accounting for these  financial  instruments  as an economic hedge.
Therefore, any changes in the fair value  of the  copper  swaps are recorded immediately  in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company  believes that the use of swap contracts  to  fix  the
purchase price of copper allows the Company the ability  to  provide firm pricing to that one customer.
The Company does not enter into swap  or  forward contracts for speculative  purposes. At December 31,
2008, unrealized losses on the copper swaps  were $1.6  million  and  are  included  in other income/
expense in the Consolidated Statement  of Operations.

96

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(16) Financial Instruments (Continued)

We measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a  recurring basis, including trading

auction rate  securities, foreign currency  derivatives and metal derivatives. The fair value of these certain
financial assets and liabilities was determined  using the following inputs at December 31, 2008:

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:

Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical
Assets

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

Total

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

(in millions)

Assets
Trading securities(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plan asset for deferred compensation(2) . . .

$ 8.3
2.4

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$10.7

Liabilities
Copper swap(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plan liability for deferred compensation(4) .

$ 1.6
2.4

Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 4.0

$ —
2.4

$2.4

$ —
2.4

$2.4

$ —
—

$ —

$1.6
—

$1.6

$8.3
—

$8.3

$ —
—

$ —

(1) Included in long-term investment  securities on the Company’s  consolidated  balance  sheet.

(2) Included in other, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

(3) Included in accrued expenses and  other liabilities on the Company’s  consolidated  balance  sheet.

(4) Included in other noncurrent liabilities  on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

The table below provides a summary  of  the changes in  fair value of all  financial assets measured at

fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the period
December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2008.

Balance
December 31,
2007

Purchases,
sales,
settlements, net

Trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$39.0

$(30.6)

Earnings

(in millions)
$(0.1)

Total realized and
unrealized gains
(losses) included in:

Comprehensive
income

Balance
December 31,
2008

$ —

$8.3

Trading securities comprise auction rate securities and rights  issued by  UBS, AG  (UBS).  The
Company holds a variety of interest bearing auction rate securities, or ARS, that includes $4.8  million
in municipal bonds and $1.2 million in student  loans at December 31, 2008. These ARS investments
are intended to provide liquidity via an auction process that resets the applicable interest rate  at
predetermined calendar intervals, allowing investors to either roll over  their  holdings  or sell  their
interests at par. The recent uncertainties  in the credit markets have affected all of the  Company’s
holdings in ARS investments, and auctions for the Company’s investments in  these  securities have
failed on their respective auction dates. Consequently, the  investments are not currently liquid  and the
Company will not be able to access these funds until  a future auction  of  these investments is  successful
or a buyer is found outside of the auction process.  Maturity  dates for these ARS investments  range
from 2027 to 2036.

97

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(16) Financial Instruments (Continued)

All of the ARS investments were AAA rated investment  grade quality and were  in compliance
with the Company’s investment policy  at  the time  of acquisition. The remaining securities  are rated
AA. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the  Company and  its  broker  elected to participate in  a
settlement offer from UBS for all of  the outstanding ARS investments. Under the terms of the
settlement offer, the Company and its broker were  issued  rights by UBS entitling the holder  to  require
UBS to purchase the underlying ARS  at  par value  for the  period  from  June  30, 2010, through  July 2,
2012. The rights also entitle UBS to purchase or sell the ARS at any time from  the settlement date, in
which  case UBS would be required to pay par  value for  the ARS.

Typically the fair value of ARS investments approximates par  value due  to  frequent interest rate

resets through the auction process. While  the Company continues to earn  interest on its ARS
investments, these investments are not  currently  trading  and  therefore  do not currently have a readily
determinable market value.

The Company has used a discounted  cash flow model to determine the estimated fair  value of  its
investment in ARS and investments in UBS  rights as of  December  31, 2008. The assumptions used in
preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates  for interest  rates,  credit quality of the ARS
issuer, timing and amount of cash flows,  government guarantees  related  to  student loans and  the
expected holding periods of the ARS. Based on this assessment  of  fair value, as  of December  31, 2008,
the Company recorded a charge of approximately  $2.4 million to other (income) expense in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for its investment in ARS.  The  Company performed a valuation
of the ARS with the rights from UBS.  The  Company determined  the  value  of  the rights based upon
the difference between the ARS without  the rights  and the  ARS with the rights. Based on this
assessment of fair value, the Company recorded the investment in  rights from UBS of approximately
$2.3 million to other (income) expense.

Cash equivalents consist of instruments  with remaining maturities  of  three months or less at the
date  of  purchase. The remaining balance  of cash  equivalents consists primarily of money market funds,
for which the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate  of fair value.

Leases

The Company leases certain manufacturing  facilities,  sales  offices, warehouses, and equipment.
Generally, the leases carry renewal provisions and require the  Company to pay maintenance  costs.

98

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(16) Financial Instruments (Continued)

Future minimum lease payments under capital  leases and non-cancelable  operating leases  as of
December 31, 2008 are as follows:

Capital Leases Operating Leases

(in millions)

2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less amount  representing interest (at rates ranging from 4.2% to 8.7%) .

Present value of net minimum capital  lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less current installments of obligations  under capital leases . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1.7
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
9.0

$17.3

(2.7)

14.6
(1.3)

Obligations under capital leases, excluding installments . . . . . . . . . . .

$13.3

Carrying amounts of assets under capital lease include:

$ 7.7
4.7
3.2
2.3
2.0
6.1

$26.0

Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

(in millions)

$17.7
7.8

$18.6
8.9

25.5
(4.3)

27.5
(4.0)

$21.2

$23.5

(17) Segment Information

Under the criteria set forth in Financial  Accounting Standards Board  No. 131, ‘‘Disclosure about

Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,’’  the Company operates in  three geographic
segments: North America, Europe, and China. Each of these segments sell similar  products, is managed
separately and has separate financial results that are  reviewed by the Company’s chief  operating
decision-maker. All intercompany sales  transactions have been eliminated. Sales  by  region are based
upon location of the entity recording the  sale. The accounting policies for each segment  are the same
as those described in the summary of  significant accounting policies (see Note 2).

99

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(17) Segment Information (Continued)

The following is a summary of the Company’s  significant accounts  and balances by segment,

reconciled to its consolidated totals:

December 31,

2008

2007

2006

(in millions)

Net Sales

North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 866.2
546.0
47.2

$ 871.0
452.6
58.7

$ 821.3
367.5
42.0

Consolidated net sales

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,459.4

$1,382.3

$1,230.8

Operating income  (loss)

North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

Subtotal  reportable segments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate (*) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minority interest
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67.8
65.7
(5.7)

127.8
(27.2)

100.6
5.1
(26.2)
1.9
(9.1)

$

93.3
53.6
7.9

154.8
(29.1)

125.7
14.5
(26.9)
2.8
(2.3)

$

98.5
50.0
7.2

$ 155.7
(25.2)

130.5
5.0
(22.1)
1.8
0.9

Income from continuing  operations  before  income taxes . . . .

$

72.3

$ 113.8

$ 116.1

Identifiable Assets

North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 821.7
716.8
121.6

$1,066.0
531.6
131.7

$1,046.8
493.4
120.7

Consolidated identifiable  assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,660.1

$1,729.3

$1,660.9

Long-Lived Assets

North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

92.3
109.3
35.8

$ 100.2
88.5
35.0

$

99.7
78.4
28.1

Consolidated long-lived assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 237.4

$ 223.7

$ 206.2

Capital Expenditures

North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Depreciation and Amortization

North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . .

$

$

$

$

8.3
13.9
4.4

26.6

18.7
21.2
5.2

45.1

$

$

$

$

13.9
12.6
11.3

37.8

17.8
15.7
5.9

39.4

$

$

$

$

14.6
27.5
2.6

44.7

17.1
13.0
5.2

35.3

*

Corporate expenses are primarily for  compensation  expense, Sarbanes-Oxley  compliance,  professional  fees,
including legal and audit expenses, shareholder services and  benefit administration  costs. These  costs  are  not
allocated to the geographic segments as  they  are viewed  as  corporate  functions  that  support all  activities.

100

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(17) Segment Information (Continued)

The North America segment consists  of  U.S. net  sales  of  $798.1  million, $805.5 million  and

$762.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,  respectively. The North
American segment also consists of U.S.  long-lived  assets of $86.6 million, $92.7 million and
$93.1 million as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Intersegment sales for the year ended  December  31, 2008 for North America,  Europe  and China
were $6.4 million, $6.4 million and $133.1  million, respectively. Intersegment sales for  the year ended
December 31, 2007 for North America,  Europe  and  China  were $6.6 million, $6.0 million and
$137.1 million, respectively. Intersegment sales for the year  ended December 31, 2006  for North
America, Europe and China were $6.9  million, $3.0 million and $82.3 million, respectively.

(18) Quarterly Financial Information  (unaudited)

Year ended December 31, 2008
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross  profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Per common share:
Basic

Income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted

Income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Dividends per common share
Year ended December 31, 2007
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Per common share:
Basic

Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted

Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

First
Quarter

Second
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter

(in millions, except per share information)

$344.0
114.4
13.9
13.7

$389.0
132.7
20.0
19.8

$379.3
123.9
16.8
16.7

$347.1
117.4
(3.4)
(3.6)

0.38
0.37

0.37
0.37

0.55
0.54

0.54
0.54

0.46
0.46

0.46
0.45

(0.09)
(0.10)

(0.09)
(0.10)

$346.1
114.7
20.0
20.0

$350.4
114.6
17.7
17.8

$340.5
110.4
18.2
18.1

$345.3
121.9
21.7
21.5

0.52
0.52

0.51
0.51
0.10

0.46
0.46

0.45
0.46
0.10

0.47
0.47

0.47
0.46
0.10

0.56
0.56

0.56
0.55
0.10

101

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  (Continued)

(19) Subsequent Events

On February 10, 2009, a plan was approved  by the  Board of Directors to expand the Company’s

restructuring program to consolidate the  Company’s manufacturing footprint in  North America and
China. The plan provides for the closure  of  three plants, with the relocation of those  operations to
existing facilities in either North America or China  or to a new  central facility in the  United States.

The footprint consolidation pre-tax charge  will  be  approximately $11.7  million,  including severance

charges of approximately $3.2 million, relocation costs of approximately $3.3 million and asset write-
downs of approximately $5.2 million. The Company also expects to record a net gain  on property  sales
of $2.4 million. One-time tax charges  of approximately  $7.0 million are also expected  to  be  incurred as
part of the building relocations. Approximately 400 positions will be eliminated  in connection  with this
consolidation. The net after tax charge for this manufacturing consolidation program is  expected to be
approximately $14.9 million ($4.4 million  non cash), with costs  being  incurred through  December 2009.
The Company expects to spend approximately  $4.8 million in capital expenditures to consolidate
operations. The Company expects this entire project will be self-funded through net proceeds from the
sale of buildings and other assets being  disposed of as  part of  the plan.

On February 9, 2009, the Company declared  a quarterly dividend of eleven  cents ($0.11) per share

on each outstanding share of Class A Common Stock and  Class  B Common Stock.

102

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

(Amounts in millions)

For the Three Years Ended December 31:

Balance At
Beginning of
Period

Additions
Charged To
Expense

Additions
Charged To
Other Accounts

Deductions

Balance At
End  of
Period

Year Ended December 31, 2006
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . .
Allowance for excess and obsolete

$ 9.3

inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$17.6

Year Ended December 31, 2007
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . .
Allowance for excess and obsolete

$10.5

inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$20.5

Year Ended December 31, 2008
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . .
Allowance for excess and obsolete

$14.9

inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$24.4

3.5

9.1

5.4

9.1

4.7

7.7

0.3

1.0

1.2

2.0

0.6

0.2

(2.6)

$10.5

(7.2)

$20.5

(2.2)

$14.9

(7.2)

$24.4

(8.0)

$12.2

(6.0)

$26.3

103

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

Description

2.1

3.1
3.2
9.1

Share Purchase Agreement dated  as of April 8, 2008 between  Bl¨ucher Metal A/S and

Watts Denmark Holding A/S (18)

Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as  amended (14)
Amended and Restated By-Laws, as  amended (1)
The Amended and Restated  George B. Horne Voting  Trust Agreement—1997  dated  as of

September 14, 1999 (15)

10.1*

Supplemental Compensation Agreement effective as of September  1, 1996 between  the

Registrant and Timothy P. Horne (9), Amendment  No. 1, dated July 25, 2000 (16), and
Amendment No. 2 dated October 23,  2002  (3)

10.2*

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the  Registrant and certain directors and

officers of the Registrant

10.3*

1996 Stock Option Plan, dated October  15, 1996 (10),  and First Amendment dated

February 28, 2003 (3)

10.4*

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. Pension Plan (amended  and restated effective as of

January 1, 2006) and First Amendment effective as  of January  1, 2008 (22)

10.5
10.6*
10.7

Registration Rights Agreement  dated July 25, 1986 (5)
Executive Incentive Bonus Plan, as amended and restated as  of  January 1, 2008  (8)
Amended and Restated Stock Restriction  Agreement  dated October 30, 1991 (2), and

Amendment dated August 26, 1997 (12)

10.8*

Watts Industries, Inc. 1991 Non-Employee Directors’ Nonqualified  Stock Option  Plan  (6),

and Amendment No. 1 (9)

10.9*
10.10

Watts Industries, Inc. 2003 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock  Option Plan (3)
Letter of Credit issued by Fleet National Bank  (as successor to BankBoston, N.A.) for the

benefit of Zurich-American Insurance Company dated  June 25, 1999, as  amended
January 22, 2001 (17)

10.11* Watts Water Technologies, Inc. Management  Stock  Purchase Plan (Amended  and Restated

as of January 1, 2005), as amended (20)

10.12

Stock Purchase Agreement dated as  of June 19, 1996  by and among Mueller  Co.,

10.13

Tyco Valves Limited, Watts Investment Company, Tyco  International Ltd. and the
Registrant (11)

Note Purchase Agreement dated as of May 15, 2003 between  the Registrant and the
Purchasers named in Schedule A thereto relating to the  Registrant’s  $50,000,000
4.87% Senior Notes, Series A, due May  15, 2010 and $75,000,000 5.47% Senior Notes,
Series B, due May 15, 2013 (7)

Form of 4.87% Senior Note due May  15, 2010 (7)
Form of 5.47% Senior Note due May  15, 2013 (7)

10.14
10.15
10.16* Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (20)
10.17*
10.18* Watts Water Technologies, Inc. Supplemental Employees Retirement Plan as Amended and

Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements  (1)

Restated Effective May 4, 2004, First Amendment  effective March 1, 2005 and Second
Amendment effective January 1, 2008 (22)

10.19*

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the Watts Water Technologies,  Inc.

2004 Stock Incentive Plan (19)

10.20*

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement  under the Watts Water  Technologies, Inc.

2004 Stock Incentive Plan (20)

10.21*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Employees under the Watts Water

Technologies, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive  Plan (Incremental Vesting) (20)

10.22*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Employees under the Watts Water

Technologies, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive  Plan (Cliff Vesting) (19)

10.23*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors  under the

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 2004  Stock Incentive Plan (19)

Exhibit No.

10.24

Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2006, between the  Registrant and  the
Purchasers named in Schedule A thereto relating to the  Registrant’s  $225,000,000
5.85% Senior Notes due April 30, 2016 (4)

Description

10.25
10.26

Form of 5.85% Senior Note due April 30, 2016 (4)
Subsidiary Guaranty, dated  as of April 27, 2006, in  connection with  the Registrant’s

5.85% Senior Notes due April 30, 2016 executed by the subsidiary guarantors party
thereto, including the form of Joinder  to  Subsidiary Guaranty (4)

10.27

First Amendment, dated as  of April 27, 2006, to Note Purchase  Agreement dated as  of

May  15, 2003 among the Registrant and the  purchasers named therein (4)

10.28

Amended and Restated Credit  Agreement,  dated as of April 27, 2006,  among  the

Registrant, certain  subsidiaries of the Registrant as Borrowers, Bank of America, N.A., as
Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and  L/C Issuer and the other lenders referred
to therein (4)

10.29

Amended and Restated Guaranty, dated as  of April  27, 2006, by  the Registrant,  the

Subsidiaries of the Registrant set forth therein  and  Watts Industries Europe B.V., in favor
of Bank of America, N.A. (4)

10.30*

Resignation Agreement dated February  14, 2008 between the Registrant and Paul A.

Lacourciere (18)

10.31*
11
21
23
31.1

31.2

32.1
32.2

Severance  Agreement dated February 16, 2009 between the Registrant and Douglas T. White
Statement Regarding Computation of Earnings per  Common  Share  (13)
Subsidiaries
Consent of KPMG LLP
Certification of Principal Executive Officer  pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)  or Rule  15d-14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule  13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)  of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

Certification of Principal Executive Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section  1350

(1) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report  on Form 8-K dated February 5, 2007

(File No. 001-11499).

(2) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report  on Form 8-K dated November 14,

1991 (File No. 001-11499).

(3) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report  on Form 10-K for the year ended

December 31, 2002 (File No. 001-11499).

(4) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report  on Form 8-K dated April 27, 2006

(File No. 001-11499).

(5) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form S-1 (No. 33-6515) as part  of  the Second

Amendment to such Form S-1 dated August  21, 1986.

(6) Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the  Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K

for year ended June 30, 1992 (File No. 001-11499).

(7) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report  on Form 8-K dated May 15,  2003

(File No. 001-11499).

(8) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report  on Form 8-K dated May 14,  2008

(File No. 001-11499).

(9) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report  on Form 10-K for year ended

June 30, 1996 (File No. 001-11499).

(10) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form S-8 (No. 333-32685) dated  August  1, 1997.

(11) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report  on Form 8-K dated September 4,

1996 (File No. 001-11499).

(12) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report  on Form 10-K for year ended

June 30, 1997(File No. 001-11499).

(13) Incorporated by reference to notes  to  Consolidated Financial Statements, Note  2 of this Report.

(14) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter

ended July 3, 2005 (File No. 001-11499).

(15) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report  on Form 10-K for year ended

June 30, 1999 (File No. 001-11499).

(16) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended

September 30, 2000 (File No. 001-11499).

(17) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report  on Form 10-K for the year ended

December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-11499).

(18) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report  on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2008

(File No. 001-11499).

(19) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter

ended September 26, 2004 (File No. 001-11499).

(20) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter

ended July 1, 2007 (File No. 001-11499).

(21) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter

ended March 30, 2008 (File No. 001-11499).

(22) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report  on Form 10-K for the year ended

December 31, 2007 (File No. 001-11499).

* Management contract or compensatory plan  or arrangement.

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

Backflow Preventer

Custom Fabrication  
at Mueller Steam Specialty

Powers Shower System

Water Infrastructure Projects in China

Robotic Welding at Ames

Watts Pressure Reducing Valve

CNC Milling Center at Webster Valve 

Pipe Cutting at Blücher

Corporate  
Information

Executive Offices
815 Chestnut Street
North Andover, MA 01845-6098
Tel. (978)688-1811
Fax: (978)688-2976

Registrar and Transfer Agent
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
161 N. Concord Exchange
South St. Paul, MN 55075
(800)468-9716

Counsel
WilmerHale
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109

Auditors
KPMG LLP
99 High Street
Boston, MA 02110

Stock Listing
New York Stock Exchange
Ticker Symbol: WTS

Executive Officers

Directors

Robert L. Ayers
Director

Kennett F. Burnes
Director

Richard J. Cathcart
Director

Timothy P. Horne
Director

Ralph E. Jackson, Jr.
Director

Kenneth J. McAvoy
Director

John K. McGillicuddy
Director

Gordon W. Moran
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board 
and Director

Daniel J. Murphy, III
Director

Patrick S. O’Keefe
Chief Executive Officer,  
President and Director

Patrick S. O’Keefe
Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director

William C. McCartney 
Chief Financial Officer 
and Treasurer

David J. Coghlan
President of North America  
and Asia

J. Dennis Cawte
Group Managing Director,  
Europe

Ernest E. Elliot
Executive Vice President of Marketing

Michael P. Flanders
Executive Vice President of  
Manufacturing Operations,  
North America and Asia

Josh C. Fu
President, Asia

Kenneth R. Lepage
General Counsel and Secretary

Gregory J. Michaud
Executive Vice President  
of Human Resources

Taylor K. Robinson
Executive Vice President of  
Supply Chain Management

This Annual Report contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private 
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements that relate to prospective events or 
developments are forward-looking statements. Also, words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” 
“expect,” “will” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. We cannot assure in-
vestors that our assumptions and expectations will prove to have been correct. There are a number 
of important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated 
or implied by forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, those 
set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 
ended December 31, 2008 included in this Annual Report. We undertake no intention or obliga-
tion to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, 
future events or otherwise.

For addition information on Watts Water Technologies, Inc., visit our web site at www.wattswater.com

A Legacy of  Annual Report 2008

Annual Report 0915 

© Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 2009 

www.wattswater.com 

65550

Innovative Water Solutions

2008