Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Paper, Lumber & Forest Products / Weatherford International Ltd.

Weatherford International Ltd.

wft · TSX Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker wft
Exchange TSX
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2017 Annual Report · Weatherford International Ltd.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
WEST FRASER

ANNUAL REPORT 2017
Including Annual Information Form
Dated: February 14, 2018

WEST FRASER ANNUAL REPORT 2017

OPERATIONS West Fraser is a North American wood products company. Its main product is lumber (spruce/pine/fir (“SPF”) and 
southern yellow pine (“SYP”)), and it also produces panels (plywood, MDF and LVL), pulp (NBSK and BCTMP), newsprint, wood 
chips and energy. The operations located in western Canada manufacture all of the products described above except SYP lumber. 

The sawmills located in the southern United States produce SYP lumber and wood chips. 

0

  PULP & PAPER

  35.  Hinton
  36.  Quesnel (2)
  37.  Slave Lake
  38.  Whitecourt

0

  PLYWOOD

  39.  Edmonton
  40.  Quesnel
  41.  Williams Lake

0

  MDF
  42.  Blue Ridge
  43.  Quesnel

0

  VENEER & LVL
  44.  Rocky Mountain House
  45.  Slave Lake

A L B E R T A
13

12

37

45

38

42

8

10

9

35

EDMONTON
39

44

11

B R I T I S H
C O L U M B I A
4

3

5

43

QUESNEL
40
1

36
2

41
7

6

VANCOUVER

34

NORTH CAROLINA

TENNESSEE

MEMPHIS

GEORGIA

32
SOUTH
CAROLINA

31

33

19 20
ARKANSAS
18

17

16

TEXAS

15

14

LOUISIANA

21 22
ALABAMA

23

30
29 28

24 25

27
26

FLORIDA

0

  LUMBER
  Canada
  1.  Quesnel
  2.  Williams Lake
  3.  Smithers
  4.  Chetwynd
  5.  Fraser Lake
  6.  Chasm
  7.  100 Mile House
  8.  Blue Ridge
  9.  Hinton
  10.  Edson
  11.  Sundre
  12.  High Prairie
  13.  Manning

0

  LUMBER
  U.S.
  14.  Joyce
  15.  Huttig
  16.  Henderson
  17.  New Boston
  18.  Leola
  19.  Mansfield
  20.  Russellville
  21.  Maplesville
  22.  Opelika
  23.  McDavid
  24.  Perry
  25.  Lake Butler
  26.  Maxville
  27.  Whitehouse 
  28.  Blackshear
  29.  Fitzgerald
  30.  Dudley 
  31.  Augusta
  32.  Newberry
  33.  Armour
  34.  Seaboard

FRONT COVER: A continuous dry kiln (CDK) dries lifts of lumber at our sawmill in Opelika, Alabama. We have constructed 33 CDKs across our Canadian and U.S. operations 
in the last six years. Today’s CDK provides better quality drying, energy efficiency, and maximizes our value, producing high-grade lumber products.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 1 - 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

FINANCIAL AND OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS ................................................................................................... 3 

REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS .............................................................................................................................. 5 

ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM .......................................................................................................................... 8 

BUSINESS OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 8 
CORPORATE STRATEGY........................................................................................................................................... 9 
CORPORATE STRUCTURE ...................................................................................................................................... 10 
HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS ......................................................................................................... 11 
FIBRE SUPPLY ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AND ACQUISITIONS ....................................................................................................... 16 
HUMAN RESOURCES .............................................................................................................................................. 17 
MARKETS ............................................................................................................................................................... 17 
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................................ 18 
LUMBER .................................................................................................................................................................. 18 
PANELS ................................................................................................................................................................... 19 
PULP & PAPER ....................................................................................................................................................... 20 
NEWSPRINT ............................................................................................................................................................ 20 
EXTERNAL FACTORS AFFECTING WEST FRASER’S BUSINESS IN 2017 ................................................................ 21 
RISK FACTORS ....................................................................................................................................................... 22 
CAPITAL STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................................................ 23 
RATINGS ................................................................................................................................................................. 23 
EXPERTS ................................................................................................................................................................. 24 
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.................................................................................................................................... 25 
GOVERNANCE......................................................................................................................................................... 27 
AUDIT COMMITTEE ............................................................................................................................................... 28 
FEES PAID TO AUDITORS ....................................................................................................................................... 29 
MATERIAL CONTRACTS ......................................................................................................................................... 29 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION .................................................................................................................................. 30 
SCHEDULE 1 – AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER ...................................................................................................... 31 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS ................................................................................................. 34 

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 35 
SUMMARY INFORMATION - ANNUAL RESULTS ..................................................................................................... 37 
SELECTED QUARTERLY INFORMATION ................................................................................................................ 38 
ADJUSTED EARNINGS AND ADJUSTED BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE .................................................................. 38 
DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS BY PRODUCT SEGMENT ............................................................................................... 40 
4TH QUARTER RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................... 44 
SALES AND EARNINGS COMPARISON .................................................................................................................... 44 
ADJUSTED EARNINGS AND ADJUSTED BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE .................................................................. 44 
DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY NON-OPERATIONAL ITEMS ............................................................... 45 
DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS BY PRODUCT SEGMENT ............................................................................................... 46 
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES ....................................................................................................................................... 49 
BUSINESS OUTLOOK .............................................................................................................................................. 49 
OPERATIONS .......................................................................................................................................................... 49 
ESTIMATED EARNINGS SENSITIVITY TO KEY VARIABLES ................................................................................... 51 
CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND LIQUIDITY .................................................................................................................. 51 
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL POSITION ..................................................................................................................... 52 
DEBT RATINGS ....................................................................................................................................................... 52 
SELECTED CASH FLOW ITEMS .............................................................................................................................. 53 
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 54 
SIGNIFICANT MANAGEMENT JUDGMENTS AFFECTING FINANCIAL RESULTS ..................................................... 54 
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT YET APPLIED ................................................................................. 56 
NON-IFRS MEASURES ........................................................................................................................................... 57 

 
- 2 - 

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES .................................................................................................................................. 59 
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING......................................... 68 

RESPONSIBILITY OF MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................................. 69 

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ............................................................................................................... 70 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS ....................................................................................................................... 71 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS ................................................ 72 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY ......................................................... 73 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS ................................................................................................... 74 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS .......................................................................................... 75 

FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL REVIEW .................................................................................................................... 107 

CORPORATE INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................... 109 

GLOSSARY OF INDUSTRY TERMS .................................................................................................................. 112 

 
- 3 - 

FINANCIAL AND OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS 

2017

2016

Earnings ($ millions)
Sales
Adjusted EBITDA1
Operating earnings
Earnings 
Cash flow from operating activities
Common Share Data (in dollars per share, except shares outstanding)
Shares outstanding (thousands)

1,160
870
596
902

674
482
326
689

5,134

4,450

 - Weighted average (basic)
 - Year-end

78,097
77,946

80,236
78,163

Earnings per share

Basic
Diluted

Dividends declared per share
Common shareholders' equity
Price range

 - High (2017 - Nov 22; 2016 - Jun 27)
 - Low (2017 - Jan 23; 2016 - Mar 30)
 - Close 

Financial Position ($ millions)
Working capital
Total assets
Long-term debt (includes current portion)
Shareholders' equity
Analytical Data
Current ratio
Capital expenditures & acquisitions ($ millions)
Net debt to capitalization (%)
Return on common shareholders' equity (%)

7.63
7.63
0.36
34.97

83.50
42.98
77.57

708
4,517
636
2,726

2.2
862
12
24

4.06
3.90
0.28
28.67

54.18
35.35
48.01

479
3,600
413
2,241

2.0
273
14
15

    
    
    
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
  
  
  
  
      
      
      
      
      
      
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
       
       
    
    
       
       
    
    
        
        
       
       
         
         
         
         
 
 
 
 
Lumber
Sales ($ millions) 2
Operating earnings ($ millions)
SPF (MMfbm)

SYP (MMfbm)

Panels
Sales ($ millions) 2
Operating earnings ($ millions)
Plywood (3/8" MMsf)

MDF (3/4" MMsf)

LVL (Mcf)

Pulp & Paper
Sales ($ millions)
Operating earnings ($ millions)
NBSK (Mtonnes)

BCTMP (Mtonnes)

Newsprint (Mtonnes)

- 4 - 

2017

2016

3,671
681
3,809
3,714
2,424
2,387

600
100
838
826
191
182
2,676
2,601

988
132
498
497
674
670
122
123

Production
Shipments
Production
Shipments

Production
Shipments
Production
Shipments
Production
Shipments

Production
Shipments
Production
Shipments
Production
Shipments

3,145
362
3,796
3,878
2,139
2,126

529
77
826
826
160
167
2,215
2,226

887
42
527
526
665
653
128
129

1. Adjusted EBITDA is described in the section titled “Non IFRS 
Measures” of our 2017 Management’s Discussion & Analysis.
2. Includes intracompany fibre sales.

    
    
       
       
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
       
       
       
         
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
    
    
    
    
       
       
       
         
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
 
 
- 5 - 

REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS 

Message from our President and Chief Executive Officer 

For more than 60 years West Fraser has been guided by a straight forward business strategy, to 
be the low-cost, high margin producer in each of our product lines and geographic regions, 
maintain a conservative financial position to manage cyclical markets and continuously reinvest 
in the business.  We believe these three pillars are the cornerstones to our success. 

In 2017 we saw the return of the softwood lumber dispute between Canada and the U.S. for the 
fifth time in the last 30 years.  We believe these duties are unwarranted and without merit and 
along with our industry and government partners will defend our position.  During the last ten 
years of managed trade we have been preparing for the potential expiration of the Softwood 
Lumber Agreement.  Since the last dispute was settled in 2006, we have invested significant 
capital in our Canadian facilities to ensure they are low-cost and a highly competitive source of 
lumber.  We have also expanded our presence in the U.S. South.  Growing our presence in this 
low cost timber region also acts as a hedge against trade actions.  After our acquisition of six 
additional sawmills in 2017, 42% of our capacity is now in the U.S. 

The economic factors that drive demand for our solid wood products continue to indicate 
favorable supply and demand fundamentals.  New home inventories remain low and housing 
starts have continued to grow in North America.  Spending on repairs, renovation and 
remodeling activities also has continued to perform well.  Offshore lumber markets that have 
been developed by the western Canadian lumber producers remain strong and will continue to be 
important markets for West Fraser.  With the exception of the U.S. South, most of the key 
lumber producing regions in North America are approaching peak production levels and growth 
in some of these regions may be constrained due to declining timber availability.  Pulp markets 
were particularly strong in the second half of 2017 due to significant demand growth in China.  
We expect that new capacity will have an impact on the global supply-demand balance but we 
continue to be positive about the long-term growth prospects from China and other Asian 
markets. 

Despite our strong results, we experienced a number of challenges in 2017.  The fire season in 
British Columbia was the worst in recorded history, destroying nearly a million hectares of 
forests and causing us to curtail a number of our operations for a period of time.  While a certain 
amount of the timber lost due to the fires was mountain pine beetle killed timber that was already 
beyond salvage, the loss of green timber is concerning and the impact of the fires will play out 
over the next several years in reductions in the annual allowable cut after salvage operations are 
complete.  All of this is likely to continue to present headwinds on log costs in British Columbia.  
Weather conditions at the start and end of the year along with a robust economy impacted the 
availability of transportation resources to ship finished products by rail and truck to our end 
customers. 

I am proud of the achievements we have made with our focus on people who are the cornerstone 
of our organization and what I believe sets us apart culturally.  We continued to make 
improvements in safety, with serious injuries declining by 12% compared to 2016.  We still have 
much more work to do to achieve our goal of eliminating serious incidents and injuries, and are 

- 6 - 

targeting further improvements in 2018 through investments in our facilities along with training 
and development activities.  At West Fraser we work hard to create a positive work environment 
in all our facilities and have been recognized again in 2017 with several awards, being named as 
one of Canada’s Top 100 Employers, one of B.C.’s Top Employers, and one of Canada’s Top 
Employers for Young People.  In addition, West Fraser was recognized once again for having 
one of Canada’s Most Admired Corporate Cultures. 

Being responsible to our environment and the resources that we consume is important for our 
long-term success.  Following the fire season in B.C., we quickly mobilized our teams to begin 
seeking ways to salvage as much burned timber as possible so the land base could be restored 
and replanted.  We are also partnering with Pinnacle Renewable energy on the construction of a 
new pellet production facility in Smithers, B.C. as an alternative use for our sawmill residuals.  
The pellets from this new facility will be used in the production of energy in overseas markets. 

West Fraser is a strong supporter of the communities in which we operate.  In 2017 our major 
contributions were to the new ice arena at the West Fraser Centre in Quesnel, B.C., the 
expansion of the West Fraser Aquatics Centre in Williams Lake, B.C., and the West Fraser 
Guild, home to the Performing Arts Theatre of Hinton, Alberta.  West Fraser also provided 
building materials to a number of community projects including Habitat for Humanity’s Carter 
Work Project in Edmonton, Alberta.  We continue to award scholarships to post-secondary 
students in more than 10 communities across western Canada and the southern U.S. 

There were a number of milestone accomplishments for West Fraser in 2017.  We increased our 
lumber production by 298 mmfbm though improvement in our own operations and additions 
through acquisitions in the U.S. South.  We completed the rebuild and restart of our WestPine 
MDF facility following a fire in 2016.  We recorded the highest Adjusted EBITDA in company 
history, growing Adjusted EBITDA by $486 million and 72% over 2016.  In August we 
completed the acquisition of six sawmills in Florida and Georgia, complementing our existing 
U.S. South footprint and adding 700 mmfbm of high margin production to our base.  Our teams 
continued to execute well on significant capital projects that will benefit us in 2018 and years to 
come.  We commissioned a complete sawmill rebuild in High Prairie, Alberta, and made 
significant upgrades at our Fraser Lake, B.C. planer mill and have several continuous drying 
kilns under construction.  In the U.S. among our more notable upgrades were major equipment 
centres at our mills in Russellville, Arkansas; Newberry, South Carolina; and Seaboard, North 
Carolina.  We are also making good progress on the construction of a replacement sawmill at our 
Opelika, Alabama facility which is expected to start operations in the third quarter of 2018.  The 
new facility will almost double our capacity at the site bringing it to 190 million board feet.  This 
is another step forward in our extensive capital program that will deploy the latest mill 
technology and work environment improvements for our talented team at Opelika.  We also had 
strong contributions from our panels and pulp business as strong pricing and improved operating 
performance over 2016 contributed to improved results. 

While 2017 was a record year for the company in Adjusted EBITDA, we remain convinced of 
the untapped potential for further improvement in all our operations.  Our consistent business 
approach, diversified operating footprint, focus on reinvesting in our business and development 
of high-performance teams puts us in a strong position to compete in our sector and product 
markets. 

- 7 - 

With the support, dedication and effort of all our employees, their families, our Board of 
Directors, our customers and communities, I am optimistic about the opportunities for continued 
success in 2018.  Our strong financial position backs our commitment to safe, modern, efficient 
operations driven by a low-cost culture which positions us well for the years ahead. 

Ted Seraphim 
President and Chief Executive Officer 

 
- 8 - 

ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM 

Date 

This Annual Information Form of West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (“West Fraser”, “we”, “us”, 
“our” or the “Company”) is dated as of February 14, 2018.  Except as otherwise indicated, the 
information contained in it is as of December 31, 2017. 

All financial information in this Annual Information Form is presented in Canadian dollars, 
unless otherwise indicated. 

Forward-looking Statements 

This Annual Information Form, and the Annual Report of which it forms a part, contain 
historical information, descriptions of current circumstances and statements about potential 
future developments.  The latter, which are forward-looking statements, are presented to provide 
reasonable guidance to the reader but their accuracy depends on a number of assumptions and 
are subject to various risks and uncertainties.  Forward-looking statements are included under the 
headings “Fibre Supply – Mountain Pine Beetle and B.C. Wildfires” (the timing of AAC 
reductions and the effect on our AACs), “Fibre Supply – Caribou Recovery Planning” (impact 
on our access to timber supply), “Fibre Supply - Aboriginal Matters” (the potential effect of 
aboriginal title or rights), “Capital Structure – Cash dividends” and “Risks and Uncertainties” in 
the 2017 Management’s Discussion & Analysis incorporated herein.  Actual outcomes and 
results will depend on a number of factors that could affect the ability of the Company to execute 
its business plans, including the matters described in these sections and under “Risk Factors”, 
and may differ materially from those anticipated or projected.  Accordingly, readers should 
exercise caution in relying upon forward-looking statements which reflect management’s 
estimates, projections and views only as of the date hereof.  The Company undertakes no 
obligation to publicly revise these statements to reflect subsequent events or changes in 
circumstances except as required by applicable securities laws. 

Business Overview 

We are a North American diversified wood products company which produces lumber (SPF and 
SYP), panels (plywood, MDF and LVL), pulp (NBSK and BCTMP), newsprint, wood chips and 
energy.  We hold rights to timber resources that are sufficient to supply a significant amount of 
the fibre required by our Canadian operations and have long-term agreements for the supply of a 
portion of the fibre required by our United States operations.  We carry on our operations 
through subsidiaries and joint operations in British Columbia, Alberta and the southern United 
States.  Our operations located in western Canada manufacture all of the products described 
above except SYP lumber.  Our sawmills located in the southern U.S. produce SYP lumber and 
wood chips. 

- 9 - 

The annual production capacities of our wholly-owned facilities and our share of the capacities 
of our 50%-owned operations are as follows: 

Lumber (MMfbm) 
SPF 
SYP 
Total 

Panels 

Plywood (MMsf 3/8”) 
MDF (MMsf 3/4") 
LVL (Mcf) 

Pulp (Mtonnes) 
BCTMP 
NBSK 

Newsprint (Mtonnes) 

Corporate Strategy 

4,150 
3,050 
7,200 

860 
250 
3,200 

690 
570 

135 

Our goal at West Fraser is to generate strong financial results through the business cycle, relying 
on our committed work force, the quality of our assets and our well-established corporate 
culture.  This culture emphasizes cost control in all aspects of the business and internal and 
external competitiveness.  In our approach to employee relations, we emphasize employee 
involvement and favour internal promotions whenever possible. 

We are a diversified producer of wood products with access to extensive timber resources.  Our 
Canadian lumber, plywood, LVL and veneer operations are directly or indirectly the primary 
source of raw material for our pulp & paper, MDF and energy operations. 

We are committed to operating in a financially conservative and prudent manner.  The North 
American wood products industry is cyclical and periodically faces difficult market conditions 
and serious challenges.  During such cyclical downturns, we focus on financial discipline, which 
may include reduction or deferral of non-essential capital expenditures.  As market conditions 
improve we will typically undertake an expanded capital investment program in order to catch up 
on expenditures that were reduced or deferred during the downturn.  We believe that maintaining 
a strong balance sheet provides the ability to react to growth opportunities and is a key tool in 
managing our operations through a business cycle. 

Acquisitions and expansions are considered with a view to extending our existing business lines, 
particularly in lumber operations, and to product and geographic diversification.  Our earnings 
over the business cycle have enabled us to make significant and ongoing capital investments in 
our facilities with the goal of achieving, maintaining or improving an overall low-cost position. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 10 - 

Corporate Structure 

The following chart shows the relationship of West Fraser to the principal direct and indirect 
subsidiaries and the joint operations in which we participate and, where less than 100%, the 
percentage of our direct or indirect ownership. 

West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. 
West Fraser Mills Ltd. 

Henderson5 
New Boston5 
Leola4 
Mansfield4 

LUMBER 
U.S. 
Canada 
Joyce4 
Quesnel 
Williams Lake  Huttig4 
Smithers 
Chetwynd 
Fraser Lake 
Chasm 
100 Mile House  Russellville4 
Maplesville4 
Blue Ridge1 
Opelika4 
Hinton 
McDavid4 
Edson 
Sundre2 
Perry6 
High Prairie 
Manning3 

PULP & PAPER 
Pulp 
Hinton 
Quesnel 
Quesnel (50%)7 
Slave Lake 

Newsprint 
Whitecourt (50%)8 

Lake Butler6 
Whitehouse4 
Maxville6 
Blackshear6 
Fitzgerald6 
Dudley6 
Augusta4 
Newberry4 
Armour4 
Seaboard4 

PANELS 
Plywood 
Edmonton 
Quesnel 
Williams Lake 

MDF 
Blue Ridge 
Quesnel 

Veneer & LVL 
Rocky Mountain 
  House2 
Slave Lake 

SPECIALTY LUMBER 
PRODUCTS 
Sundre2  
Edson  
Blackshear6 

1.  Owned through Blue Ridge Lumber Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary. 
2.  Owned through Sundre Forest Products Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary. 
3.  Owned through Manning Forest Products Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary 
4.  Owned through West Fraser, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary. 
5.  Owned through West Fraser Wood Products Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary. 
6.  Owned through West Fraser Southeast, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary. 
7. 
8. 

50% interest in Cariboo Pulp & Paper Company. 
50% interest in Alberta Newsprint Company owned through West Fraser Newsprint Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 11 - 

West Fraser is organized under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) and assumed 
its present form in 1966 by the amalgamation of a group of companies under the laws of B.C.  
The principal operating subsidiary, West Fraser Mills Ltd., assumed its present form on 
January 1, 2005 by amalgamation under those laws.  West Fraser, Inc., West Fraser Wood 
Products Inc. and West Fraser Southeast, Inc. are Delaware corporations, while Blue Ridge 
Lumber Inc., Manning Forest Products Ltd. and Sundre Forest Products Inc. are Alberta 
corporations.  West Fraser Newsprint Ltd. subsists under the laws of Canada.  Alberta Newsprint 
Company (“ANC”) and Cariboo Pulp & Paper Company are unincorporated 50%-owned 
operations governed, respectively, by the laws of Alberta and B.C. 

Our executive office is located at 858 Beatty Street, Suite 501, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 
V6B 1C1 and our registered office is located at 1500 – 1055 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, 
B.C., Canada, V6E 4N7. 

History and Development of Business 

West Fraser originated in 1955 when three brothers, Pete, Bill and Sam Ketcham, acquired a 
lumber planing mill located in Quesnel, B.C. (“Quesnel”).  From 1955 through 2017 the business 
expanded through the acquisition of a number of sawmills and related timber harvesting rights 
and the acquisition or development of lumber, panel and pulp & paper businesses. 

Major developments for West Fraser during the last four years include the following: 

2014 

  Acquired two sawmills in Arkansas and one in High Prairie, 

2015 

Alberta. 

  Permanently closed our Houston, B.C., Slave Lake, Alberta and 

Folkston, Georgia sawmills. 

  Capital investment sets new annual record at $410 million. 
  Completed six continuous kilns, two planer projects and four major 

sawmill upgrades. 

  Completed a low consistency refiner project at our BCTMP mill in 

Quesnel. 

  Acquired a sawmill in Manning, Alberta. 
  Completed co-generation projects at two of our B.C. sawmills to 
generate electricity from wood waste to be sold under long-term 
contracts. 

  Completed biogas-electricity generation project at our Slave Lake, 

Alberta pulp mill.  First electricity generated January 2016. 
  Completed three continuous kilns, two planer projects and one 

major sawmill upgrade. 

- 12 - 

2016 

  Terminated power purchase agreements that had provided us with a 
portion of the electricity generated from two power plants in Alberta 
at substantially predetermined rates. 

  MDF facility in Quesnel was closed for repairs following a fire on 

March 9. 

  A coalition of U.S. lumber producers petitioned the U.S. 

Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade 
Commission to investigate alleged subsidies to Canadian producers 
and levy duties against Canadian imports. 

  Completed three continuous kilns. 

2017 

  MDF facility in Quesnel damaged by fire in 2016 was repaired and 

began producing board on April 29. 

  Acquired six sawmills and a finger-joint (specialty lumber) mill in 

Florida and Georgia as well as an administrative office in St. Marys, 
Georgia (the “Gilman Acquisition”). 

  On December 4 the U.S. Department of Commerce determined final 

duty rates for West Fraser of 23.56%. 

  Completed four continuous kilns and two major sawmill upgrades. 

Sales Revenue 
($ millions) 
Year ended December 31 
Lumber 
Panels 
Pulp & Paper 
Intracompany fibre sales 

Fibre Supply 

2017 
3,671 
600 
988 
(125) 
5,134 

2016 
3,145 
529 
887 
(111) 
4,450 

2015 
2,764 
554 
900 
(118) 
4,100 

2014 
2,622 
526 
812 
(104) 
3,856 

2013 
2,315 
467 
780 
(88) 
3,474 

Our operations are dependent on the consistent supply of substantial quantities of wood fibre in 
various forms.  The primary manufacturing facilities, which produce lumber, plywood and LVL, 
consume whole logs while the pulp & paper and MDF facilities mostly consume wood 
by-products in the form of wood chips, shavings and sawdust resulting from the production of 
lumber, plywood or LVL.  Many facilities also consume hog fuel and wood waste in energy 
systems. 

In B.C. and Alberta substantially all timberlands are publicly owned and the right to harvest 
timber is acquired through provincially-granted licences.  Licences grant the holder the right to 
harvest up to a specified quantity of timber annually and either have a term of 15 to 25 years and 
are replaceable or have a shorter term but are not replaceable.  Government objectives in 
granting licenses include responsible management of timber, soils, wildlife, water and fish 
resources and the preservation of biodiversity and the protection of cultural values.  The 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 13 - 

objectives also include achieving the fullest possible economic utilization of the forest resources 
and employment in local communities. 

Timber tenures in B.C. and Alberta require the payment of a fee, commonly known as stumpage, 
for timber harvested pursuant to its terms.  Stumpage in Alberta is product-price specific and 
varies with the sales price of the product into which the logs will be converted.  Stumpage in 
B.C. is substantially based on the results of certain publicly-auctioned timber harvesting rights. 

Timber tenures in B.C. and Alberta require the holder to carry out reforestation to ensure 
re-establishment of the forest after harvesting.  Reforestation projects are planned and supervised 
by our woodlands staff and are subject to approval by relevant government authorities.  Our 
timber harvesting operations are carried out by independent contractors under the supervision of 
our woodlands staff. 

The following table summarizes the timber tenures, as at December 31, 2017, which supply the 
Canadian mills that we own or in which we have an interest, as well as our AAC for such 
tenures. 

Timber Tenures (thousand m3) 
Location 
B.C. 

AAC 
5,621 
200 
6,910 
1,301 
Long-term tenures include TFLs, FMAs, timber quotas and forest licences, which are renewable timber tenures.  Short-term tenures include 

Tenure1 
Coniferous Long-term  
Coniferous Short-term  
Coniferous Long-term 
Deciduous Long-term 

Expiry 
2022 - 2035 
2018 
2018 - 2033 
2019 - 2033 

Alberta 

1. 
non-replaceable forest licences. 

We do not own or manage any timberlands in the U.S. 

Log Supply 

Annual log requirements for our Canadian sawmills, plywood facilities and LVL plant, all 
operating at the capacities described herein, would total approximately 16 million m3.  
Approximately 80% of these requirements can be obtained from the tenures described in the 
above table and the balance is typically acquired from third parties holding short or long-term 
timber harvesting rights, including independent logging contractors, aboriginal groups, 
communities and woodlot owners.  We do not necessarily consume the maximum permitted 
volume of logs that may be harvested from our tenures annually but will adjust between tenure 
and purchase logs depending on circumstances including the availability of purchase logs. 

Our U.S. operations, which produce SYP lumber, would consume approximately 13 million tons 
of logs per year if operating at the capacity described herein.  Our U.S. operations as a whole 
have access to approximately 17% of their log requirements under certain long-term supply 
contracts, and the balance is purchased on the open market.  Open market purchases come from 
timber real estate investment trusts, timberland investment management organizations and 
private land owners. 

 
 
Mountain Pine Beetle and B.C. Wildfires 

- 14 - 

The mountain pine beetle infestation in the B.C. interior reached a peak, in terms of the annual 
timber mortality rate, more than 12 years ago. Approximately 40% of B.C.’s crown forest is 
within the timber harvesting land base (“THLB”), and approximately 29% of the THLB is pine.  
When assessing the THLB of B.C.’s interior, approximately 37% is pine. The damage to the 
mature pine forests within our operating areas is significant. 

We continue to focus on the salvage and processing of dead pine in order to utilize as much of 
the resource as possible and to ensure that affected sites are promptly reforested.  The Province 
of B.C. increased the AAC on dead pine stands and limited the harvest of non-pine species until 
the salvage of dead pine stands comes to a conclusion.  The AAC has been or will be reduced to 
reflect lower mature inventories as dead pine stands are harvested or when they are no longer 
economic to harvest.  The Province has reduced the AAC in B.C.’s central interior by 
approximately 32% in the past five years and we expect this process to continue over the next 
several years.  To date, B.C.’s Chief Forester has announced reductions of the AAC in six of our 
operating areas in the interior.  No reductions are expected in 2018.  

Wildfires in B.C. burned nearly a million hectares of forest land in 2017. Our Cariboo region 
operating areas were significantly impacted. Salvage of fire damaged trees has begun and is 
expected to continue for 2-4 years.  

As the timing of future AAC reductions and the effect on our AACs will depend on a variety of 
factors, including the impact of wildfires and the amount of non-pine species available for 
harvest, the full effect on our operations cannot reasonably be determined at this time. 

In Alberta, the Minister and the forest industry continue to implement aggressive programs of 
early mountain pine beetle detection, single tree control and focussed harvesting activity.  The 
mountain pine beetle infestation significantly expanded from Jasper National Park into our 
Hinton forest management area (“FMA”) in 2017.   We continue to work aggressively to reduce 
the number of susceptible pine stands and conduct spread control activities across the region in 
concert with other forest industry participants and the Province of Alberta. 

Caribou Recovery Planning 

Draft mountain caribou recovery plans were released by the Alberta government in December 
2017. The AAC impact from these plans will depend on the final location of conservation areas 
and the forest harvest regimes that are implemented. Plans are expected to be finalized in 2018.   

A Draft Canada-British Columbia Conservation Agreement for Southern Mountain Caribou 
recovery of the Central Group (three herds in south Peace area) is currently undergoing 
consultation.  This draft agreement is broad and involves identification of additional 
conservation areas.  We expect this will have some impact on our access to timber supply, but 
we are unable to predict or quantify the impact at this stage in the planning process. 

Forestry Certification 

- 15 - 

We obtain external certification from a number of accredited standard-setting certification bodies 
which offer independent verification of the measures that we take to mitigate the effects of our 
activities on the environment. 

All of the Canadian woodlands operations directly managed by us are independently certified by 
the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (“SFI”), an internationally-recognized sustainable forest 
management certification program.   

We also subscribe to the chain-of-custody certification Programme for Endorsement of Forest 
Certification (“PEFC”) standard for our Canadian-produced forest products.  PEFC chain of 
custody assures customers that the fibre in the supply chain comes from sources that comply 
with applicable laws, regulations and sustainable resource standards.  The standard also 
demonstrates avoidance of sourcing fibre from controversial sources. 

PEFC is a global organization that provides a mutual recognition framework for national 
certification systems.  PEFC recognizes more than 25 national certification systems, including 
SFI, and assures customers that differing systems provide a consistent level of sustainable forest 
management. 

Our pulp operations and MDF mills are registered to the Forest Stewardship Council’s (“FSC”) 
Standard for Chain of Custody Certification and the Standard for Company Evaluation of FSC 
Controlled Wood.  This standard independently verifies that these operations do not source fibre 
from wood harvested  (i) illegally, (ii) in violation of traditional and civil rights, (iii) in forests 
where high conservation values are threatened by management activities, (iv) in forests being 
converted to plantations or non-forest use, (v) from forests in which genetically modified trees 
are planted, or (vi) in violation of any of the ILO Core Conventions, as defined in the ILO 
Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, 1988. 

We do not own or manage any forestlands in the United States.  However, our U.S. sawmills 
procure wood from a variety of sources normally within an approximate 70-mile radius of each 
mill.  All of our U.S. mills except those purchased with the Gilman Acquisition are certified 
under the SFI Fiber Sourcing Standard. 

For more information concerning our sustainable and environmentally sound forest practices see 
our Responsibility Report at www.westfraser.com. 

Aboriginal Matters 

Our continued access to the forest resource in Canada could be adversely affected by right and 
title (or claims thereto) and treaties involving various aboriginal groups, including First Nations, 
Métis and others.  The obligations of Canadian provincial governments to consult and 
accommodate aboriginal groups regarding asserted and established rights, as well as their 
obligations under existing treaties and ongoing treaty negotiations, could affect the issuance, 
validity, renewal and exercise and terms and conditions of Crown timber rights and 
authorizations to harvest, or the timeliness of obtaining such rights.  If aboriginal title is proven 

- 16 - 

over any of the lands where we have interests or rights, it could result in aboriginal ownership of 
the resources on title lands. 

To date there has been only one court case finding aboriginal title in B.C. where aboriginal title 
was found to be held by the Tsilhqot’in Nation in respect of an area that is less than 0.2% of 
B.C., but where we do not hold cutting permits. 

As the jurisprudence and government policies respecting aboriginal title and rights and the 
consultation process continue to evolve, we cannot at this time predict whether aboriginal claims 
will have a material adverse effect on our timber harvesting rights or on our ability to exercise, 
renew or transfer them, or secure other timber harvesting rights. 

Residual Fibre Supply  

In Canada substantially all our requirements for wood chips, shavings and sawdust and hog fuel 
are supplied from our own operations, either directly or indirectly through trades.  This reduces 
our exposure to risks associated with price fluctuations and supply shortages of these products. 

Our B.C. sawmills and plywood plants produce substantially all of the fibre requirements of our 
B.C. pulp operations and MDF plant.  The Alberta MDF plant obtains its fibre from the adjacent 
Blue Ridge sawmill and other sawmills in the area.  The Hinton pulp mill obtains its fibre from 
the adjacent Hinton sawmill and other sawmills in the area owned by us.  At times we produce 
whole log chips at the Hinton facility to supplement the supply of residual chips from our various 
sawmills.  The fibre requirements of our newsprint mill are obtained from local sawmills, 
including our sawmill in Blue Ridge and the Slave Lake veneer operation, through chip purchase 
agreements and log-for-chip trades using logs harvested from the newsprint mill’s tenures.  The 
Slave Lake deciduous FMA provides most of the fibre requirements of the Slave Lake pulp mill, 
with the balance being obtained from logs purchased from local suppliers. 

The majority of the wood chips produced by our U.S. operations are sold to pulp mills and pellet 
plants at market prices pursuant to long-term contracts. 

Capital Expenditures and Acquisitions 

We regularly invest in upgrading and expanding our facilities and operations.  However, during 
periods when earnings are weak, we may reduce capital and other expenditures in order to 
preserve liquidity.  The following table shows the capital expenditures and acquisitions during 
the past five years. 

Capital Expenditures and Acquisitions ($ millions) 
Year ended December 31 
Lumber 
Panels 
Pulp & Paper 
Corporate & Other 

Acquisitions 

Human Resources 

- 17 - 

2017 
247 
22 
58 
9 
336 
526 
862 

2016 
195 
25 
42 
11 
273 
- 
273 

2015 
172 
5 
32 
11 
220 
76 
296 

2014 
326 
7 
71 
6 
410 
208 
618 

2013 
281 
5 
71 
1 
358 
- 
358 

At December 31, 2017, we employed approximately 8,600 individuals, including our share of 
those in 50%-owned operations.  Of these, approximately 6,100 are employed in our lumber 
segment, 1,320 in our panels segment, 850 in our pulp & paper segment and 330 in our corporate 
segment.  Approximately 34% of our employees are covered by collective agreements.  In 2018, 
collective agreements covering approximately 1,550 employees will expire. 

We provide ongoing safety training for our employees to minimize potential risks inherent in 
forestry-related manufacturing industries.  Our Health and Safety Policy and a description of 
external safety certifications obtained by us are described in our Responsibility Report on our 
website at www.westfraser.com. 

Markets 

The markets for our products are highly competitive.  Our products are sold in markets open to a 
number of companies with similar products and we compete with global producers.  Our 
competitive position is affected by factors such as cost and availability of raw materials, energy 
and labour, the ability to maintain high operating rates and low per-unit manufacturing costs, and 
the quality of our final products.  Some of our products may also compete with non-fibre based 
alternatives or with alternative products in certain market segments.  Purchasing decisions by 
customers are generally based on price, quality and service.  However, because commodity 
products such as ours have few distinguishing properties from producer to producer, competition 
for these products is based primarily on price.  Prices and sales volumes are influenced by 
general economic conditions.  The following table shows selected average benchmark prices for 
the past five years for the primary products of the type we produced, although these prices do not 
necessarily reflect the prices we obtained. 

 
 
Average Benchmark Prices (In US$ except plywood) 

- 18 - 

2017 
401 
323 
433 
509 
1,105 
712 
584 
0.771 

SPF #2 & Better 2x4 (per Mfbm)1 
SPF #3 Utility 2x4 (per Mfbm)1 
SYP #2 West 2x4 (per Mfbm)2 
Plywood (per Msf 3/8” basis)3 Cdn$ 
NBSK – U.S. (per tonne)4 
NBSK – China (per tonne)5 
Newsprint (per tonne)6 
US$/$Cad7 
Sources: (refer to our 2017 Management’s Discussion & Analysis for Canadian dollar equivalent prices of the products described herein) 
1.  Random Lengths – Net FOB mill. 
2.  Random Lengths – Net FOB mill Westside. 
3.  Crow’s Market Report – Delivered Toronto. 
4.  Resource Information Systems, Inc. – U.S. list price, delivered U.S. 
5.  Resource Information Systems, Inc. – China list price, delivered China. 
6.  Resource Information Systems, Inc. – U.S. delivered 48.8 gram newsprint. 
7.  Bank of Canada annual average exchange rate. 

2014 
349 
302 
427 
429 
1,025 
732 
604 
0.905 

2016 
305 
240 
409 
432 
978 
599 
560 
0.755 

2015 
278 
209 
376 
430 
972 
644 
538 
0.782 

2013 
356 
295 
414 
392 
941 
700 
608 
0.971 

Research and Development 

We support industry research and development organizations, and conduct research and 
development at several plants to improve processes, maximize resource utilization and develop 
new products and environmental applications.  In addition, in the previous five years we have 
focused on projects in bio-energy generation and bio-products, including alternative uses for 
lignin recovered during the pulping process. 

Lumber 

Capacity and Production (both MMfbm) 

Capacity (year-end) 
B.C. 
Alberta 
U.S. South 

Production 
B.C. 
Alberta 
U.S. South 

2017 

2016 

2015 

2014 

2013 

2,460 
1,690 
3,050 
7,200 

2,257 
1,552 
2,424 
6,233 

2,465 
1,635 
2,400 
6,500 

2,303 
1,493 
2,139 
5,935 

2,400 
1,600 
2,300 
6,300 

2,225 
1,374 
2,008 
5,607 

2,480 
1,420 
2,300 
6,200 

2,282 
1,194 
1,817 
5,293 

2,470 
1,330 
2,000 
5,800 

2,477 
1,094 
1,582 
5,153 

Lumber capacity is generally based on our sawmills running on a five-day, two-shift basis with 
certain exceptions where logs may be available to run a third shift.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operations 

- 19 - 

We operate 34 sawmills, a wood-treating facility at the Sundre sawmill, a specialty 
manufacturing plant at the Edson sawmill and a finger joint facility at the Blackshear sawmill.  
Our Canadian sawmills, of which 7 are in B.C. and 6 are in Alberta, produce spruce, pine, fir 
lumber of various grades and dimensions.  Our 21 U.S. sawmills produce southern yellow pine 
lumber of various grades and dimensions. 

Sales 

Lumber produced at our Canadian sawmills and sold to North American customers is marketed 
and sold from our sales office in Quesnel, while sales to offshore markets are made from our 
export sales office in Vancouver, B.C.  Offshore sales activities are complemented by a customer 
service office in Japan.  Lumber produced at our U.S. sawmills is marketed by our sales group in 
Memphis, Tennessee and St. Marys, Georgia.  From time to time, we purchase lumber for resale 
in order to meet requirements of customers. 

In 2017, sales of lumber from our Canadian and U.S. operations were made to customers in the 
U.S. and Canada and to customers offshore, predominantly in China and Japan.  Most lumber 
shipments to North American customers by our Canadian operations were made by rail and the 
balance by truck.  Most lumber shipments to North American customers by our U.S. operations 
were delivered by truck and the balance by rail.  Offshore shipments from both Canada and the 
U.S. were made through various public terminals in bulk or container vessels. 

Panels 

Capacity and Production 

Plywood (MMsf 3/8” basis) 
Capacity (year-end) 
Production 
MDF (MMsf 3/4” basis) 
Capacity (year-end) 
Production 
LVL (Mcf) 
Capacity (year-end) 
Production 

Operations 

2017 

2016 

2015 

2014 

2013 

860 
838 

250 
191 

850 
826 

250 
160 

830 
797 

250 
220 

830 
771 

300 
206 

830 
781 

300 
204 

3,200 
2,676 

3,200 
2,215 

3,200 
1,627 

3,200 
1,796 

3,200 
1,848 

Our panel operations include three plywood mills that primarily produce standard softwood 
sheathing plywood, two MDF mills, each with the flexibility to manufacture varying thicknesses 
and sizes, an LVL mill, and a veneer mill that produces veneer for use in our Edmonton plywood 
mill.  A fire at our MDF plant in Quesnel on March 9, 2016 resulted in the closure of the plant 
while repairs and reconstruction took place.  The plant began producing board April 29, 2017 
and returned to normal production levels by year end.  This reduced 2016 and 2017 MDF 
production compared to prior years. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 20 - 

Sales 

Plywood, LVL and MDF are marketed from our sales office in Quesnel to retail outlets, 
wholesale distributors, remanufacturers and treating businesses.  MDF is marketed under the 
names “Ranger”™, “WestPine”™, “Eco-Gold”™ and “Ecopremium”™ both from our sales 
office and through distributors. 

In 2017 the majority of our sales of plywood were made to customers in Canada and sales of 
MDF and LVL were to customers in the U.S. and Canada.  Shipments were by rail or truck. 

Pulp & Paper 

Pulp 

Capacity and Production (Mtonnes) 

2017 

2016 

2015 

2014 

2013 

BCTMP 
Capacity (year-end) 
Production 
NBSK 
Capacity (year-end) 
Production1 
1.  Reflects West Fraser's 50% ownership of the Cariboo pulp mill. 

690 
674 

570 
498 

680 
665 

570 
527 

650 
645 

570 
497 

650 
631 

570 
455 

650 
603 

590 
496 

Operations 

BCTMP is produced at our Slave Lake pulp mill, primarily from hardwood aspen, and is also 
produced at our QRP mill, primarily from softwood species.  These pulps are used by paper 
manufacturers to produce paperboard products, printing and writing papers and a variety of other 
paper grades.  NBSK is produced at our Hinton and Cariboo pulp mills and is used by paper 
manufacturers to produce a variety of paper products, including tissues and printing and writing 
papers. 

Sales 

Pulp is marketed out of our pulp sales office in Vancouver.  In 2017, sales of both NBSK and 
BCTMP were to customers in North America, Asia (predominantly China) and to other offshore 
customers.  Shipments within North America were primarily by rail and those to offshore 
customers were by rail and truck to Vancouver and then by bulk or container vessels. 

Newsprint 

Capacity and Production1 (Mtonnes) 

Capacity (year-end) 
Production 
1. 

reflects West Fraser’s 50% ownership. 

2017 
135 
122 

2016 
135 
128 

2015 
135 
133 

2014 
135 
132 

2013 
135 
119 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operations 

- 21 - 

Our 50%-owned newsprint mill at Whitecourt, Alberta produces standard newsprint in four basis 
weights: 40, 43, 45 and 48.8 grams per square metre. 

Sales 

Newsprint is sold to various publishers and printers in North America and delivered by rail and 
truck. 

External Factors Affecting West Fraser’s Business in 2017 

Economic Conditions 

Our earnings are sensitive to changes in world economic conditions, primarily those in North 
America, Europe and Asia and particularly to the U.S. housing market.  Most of our revenues are 
from sales of commodities for which prices are sensitive to variations in supply and demand.  
Since most of these sales are in U.S. dollars, exchange fluctuations of the U.S. dollar against the 
Canadian dollar is a major source of earnings volatility for us. 

Softwood Lumber Dispute  

The Canada – U.S. Softwood Lumber Agreement (“SLA”) expired in October 2015 and on the 
expiry of that agreement a one year moratorium on trade sanctions by the U.S. came into place.  
The Government of Canada and the U.S. Trade Representative have been unable to reach 
agreement on a new managed trade agreement. 

In November of 2016 a coalition of U.S. lumber producers petitioned the U.S. Department of 
Commerce (“USDOC”) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) to investigate 
alleged subsidies to Canadian producers and levy countervailing and anti-dumping duties against 
Canadian imports.  The USDOC made its preliminary determination regarding countervailing 
duties in April 2017, and in June 2017 for anti-dumping duties.  In December of 2017 final 
countervailing and anti-dumping rates for West Fraser of 17.99% and 5.57% respectively were 
confirmed by the USITC.   

A substantial portion of our products that are manufactured in Canada are exported for sale.  Our 
financial results are dependent on continued access to the export markets and tariffs and other 
trade barriers that restrict or prevent access represent a continuing risk to us.  The SLA had 
provided our Canadian lumber operations with continued access to the U.S. market and the 
imposition of future trade barriers could impair that access.   

Energy 

Our pulp, paper and MDF operations consume substantial amounts of electricity.  We have 
completed several projects to reduce our purchased energy dependence by utilizing woodwaste 
to produce heat and steam to dry our wood products or to utilize woodwaste or pulp mill 
by-products or effluent to generate electricity.  Such projects include those at our Hinton and 
Cariboo pulp mills, which have generating facilities which produce electricity to satisfy most of 

- 22 - 

their energy requirements and can contribute to earnings by selling any excess electricity.  In 
addition, our Slave Lake pulp mill produces electricity for its own use from bio-gas reclaimed 
from effluent treatment.  

Co-generation projects at our Fraser Lake and Chetwynd, B.C. sawmills produce electricity from 
woodwaste.  The electricity is sold under long-term contracts.  

In B.C., electricity is purchased from the provincial utility at regulated prices based largely on 
generation costs.  In Alberta, electricity is purchased at market prices through the Alberta power 
pool.  

In Alberta, we operate a natural gas-fired peaking power price plant at our 50%-owned newsprint 
mill which provides a partial hedge for that mill against high prices of electricity and 
transmission costs.  Our exposure to energy costs includes the cost to purchase electricity, natural 
gas, gasoline, diesel fuels, carbon taxes and fuel surcharges on purchased transportation. 

Environment 

Our manufacturing operations are subject to environmental protection laws and regulations.  We 
have developed and apply internal programs and policies to help ensure that our operations are in 
compliance with applicable laws and standards and to address any instances of non-compliance.  
We are committed to responsible stewardship of the environment and to the continual 
improvement of our forest practices and manufacturing procedures so we can optimize the use of 
resources and minimize the impact of our operations on the environment. 

We have incurred, and will continue to incur, capital expenditures and operating costs to comply 
with environmental laws and regulations, which are not expected to have material financial or 
operational effects on us or our competitive position.  We are required to carry out remediation 
activities, including site decommissioning, under applicable environmental protection laws and 
regulations.  In addition, we are required to carry out reforestation activities under our various 
timber licenses.  We maintain accruals in our financial statements for certain environmental, 
reforestation and decommissioning obligations. 

We have adopted and follow an Environmental Policy, a copy of which is available on our 
website at www.westfraser.com.  Additional information is available in our Responsibility 
Report, also available on our website at www.westfraser.com. 

Risk Factors 

A detailed discussion of risk factors is included under the heading “Risks and Uncertainties” in 
Management's Discussion & Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2017, which is 
incorporated herein by reference.  Our Management’s Discussion & Analysis is available on 
SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 

- 23 - 

Capital Structure 

Share Capital 

Our authorized share capital consists of 430,000,000 shares divided into: 

(a) 

(b) 

(c) 

400,000,000 Common shares, 

20,000,000 Class B Common shares, and 

10,000,000 Preferred shares, issuable in series. 

The Common shares and Class B Common shares are equal in all respects, including the right to 
dividends, rights upon dissolution or winding up and the right to vote, except that each Class B 
Common share may at any time be exchanged for one Common share.  The Common shares are 
listed and traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol WFT while our Class B 
Common shares are not.  Certain circumstances or corporate transactions may require the 
approval of the holders of our Common shares and Class B Common shares on a separate class 
by class basis. 

As at December 31, 2017, the issued share capital consisted of 75,664,558 Common shares and 
2,281,478 Class B Common shares for a total of 77,946,036 shares (as at December 31, 2016 –
78,162,568 shares). 

Credit Ratings 

As shown in the table below, West Fraser is rated by three rating agencies.  West Fraser pays 
annual fees to maintain its debt and corporate ratings.  The ratings are assigned both on a 
corporate level and specifically to our US$300 million notes maturing October 2024.  The 
ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or 
withdrawal at any time by each rating agency. 

Ratings 

Outlook 
Agency 
DBRS1 
Stable 
Moody’s2 
Stable 
Standard & Poor’s3 
Stable 
1.  DBRS credit ratings for long-term obligations range from AAA to D.  A rating of BBB is described by DBRS as “adequate credit quality.  
The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is considered acceptable.  May be vulnerable to future events”.  Additional information on 
the rating is available on DBRS’s website. 
2.  Moody’s credit ratings for long-term obligations range from Aaa to C.  Moody’s describes obligations rated Baa as “subject to moderate 
credit risk.  They are considered medium-grade and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics”.  Additional information on the rating 
is available on Moody’s website. 
3. 
investment grade by market participants”.  Additional information on the rating is available on S&P’s website. 

S&P credit ratings for long-term obligations range from AAA to D.  A rating of BBB- is described by S&P as “considered lowest 

Rating 
BBB(low) 
Baa3 
BBB- 

 
Market Prices 

- 24 - 

The following table sets forth adjusted market prices and trading volumes of our Common shares 
on the Toronto Stock Exchange for each month of 2017 and 2016. 

High 
($) 
48.38 
55.82 
58.89 
62.28 
62.50 
63.32 
67.61 
69.66 
73.30 
81.51 
83.50 
82.32 

January 
February 
March  
April 
May 
June 
July 
August 
September 
October 
November 
December 
Total 
Source:  http://tradingdata.tsx.com 

Cash dividends 

Low 
($) 
42.98 
44.20 
54.12 
55.18 
56.11 
57.95 
58.40 
60.60 
61.86 
71.50 
76.88 
73.86 

2017 

2016 

Close 
($) 
44.44 
55.13 
55.62 
61.34 
58.81 
61.38 
66.25 
64.79 
72.00 
78.47 
81.54 
77.57 

Volume 
(000’s) 
4,907 
6,456 
7,633 
7,656 
5,411 
4,309 
5,294 
5,152 
7,500 
5,904 
5,276 
4,469 
69,967 

Close 
($) 
48.15 
41.83 
52.11 
41.34 
44.80 
37.77 
44.86 
44.15 
40.43 
45.92 
47.89 
48.01 

Volume 
(000’s) 
4,555 
4,355 
6,941 
5,977 
6,067 
7,231 
7,754 
5,816 
5,428 
6,165 
7,517 
4,468 
72,274 

The declaration and payment of cash dividends is within the discretion of our Board of Directors.  
Historically, cash dividends have been declared on a quarterly basis payable after the end of each 
quarter.  On an annual basis, dividends of $0.36 per share were declared in 2017 and $0.28 per 
share were declared in 2016 and 2015.  There can be no assurance that dividends will continue to 
be declared and paid by us in the future, as the discretion of the Board of Directors will be 
exercised from time to time taking into account our current circumstances. 

Transfer Agent 

Our transfer agent and registrar is AST Trust Company (Canada), with registers of transfers in 
Vancouver and Toronto. 

Experts 

Our auditors are PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), who prepared the Auditor’s Report 
included with our annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 
2017.  PwC has confirmed that it is independent with respect to us, within the meaning of the 
Rules of Professional Conduct of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of B.C., as of 
February 14, 2018. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 25 - 

Directors and Officers 

Directors 

The names and municipalities of residence of the directors of the Company, their principal 
occupations during the past five years and the periods during which they have been directors of 
the Company are as follows: 

Name and Municipality 
of Residence 

Principal Occupation 

Director Since 

Henry H. Ketcham 
Vancouver, B.C. 

Chairman 

Reid E. Carter1 & 4 
West Vancouver, B.C. 

President, Brookfield Timberlands 
Management LP. 

September 16, 
1985 

April 19, 2016 

John N. Floren2, 3 & 4 
Eastham, Massachusetts 

President and Chief Executive Officer, 
Methanex Corporation 

April 19, 2016 

Brian G. Kenning2 & 4 
Vancouver, B.C. 

John K. Ketcham3 & 4 
Santa Monica, California 

Gerald J. Miller1,3 & 4 
Kelowna, B.C. 

Robert L. Phillips2, 4 & 5 
West Vancouver, B.C. 

Janice G. Rennie1, 2 & 4 
Edmonton, Alberta 

Ted Seraphim 
North Vancouver, B.C. 

Corporate Director 

April 19, 2017 

Real Estate Developer 

April 28, 2015 

Corporate Director 

April 19, 2012 

Corporate Director 

April 28, 2005 

Corporate Director 

April 28, 2004 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

April 30, 2013 

Corporate Director 

Gillian D. Winckler1, 3 & 4 
Vancouver, B.C. 
1.  Member of the Audit Committee. 
2.  Member of the Human Resources & Compensation Committee. 
3.  Member of the Safety & Environment Committee. 
4.  Member of the Governance & Nominating Committee. 
5. 

Lead Director. 

April 19, 2017 

Each director has held the same or a similar principal occupation with the organization indicated 
or a predecessor thereof for the last five years except for Henry H. Ketcham who before 
April 19, 2016 was our Executive Chairman, before March 1, 2013 was our Chairman and Chief 
Executive Officer and before April 19, 2012 was also our President; John Floren who before 

- 26 - 

January 2013 was Senior Vice President, Global Marketing and Logistics of Methanex 
Corporation; Ted Seraphim who before March 1, 2013 was President and Chief Operating 
Officer, before April 19, 2012 was Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer; and 
Gillian Winckler who before June 2015 was CEO and President, as well as CFO for a brief 
period of Coalspur Limited.  The term of office of each director will expire at the conclusion of 
the Company’s next annual general meeting. 

Officers 

Name and Municipality 
of Residence 

Ted Seraphim 
North Vancouver, B.C. 

Raymond W. Ferris 
Quesnel, B.C. 

Brian A. Balkwill 
Quesnel, B.C. 

Keith D. Carter 
Quesnel, B.C. 

Larry E. Gardner 
Quesnel, B.C. 

James W. Gorman 
Victoria, B.C. 

Rodger M. Hutchinson 
West Vancouver, B.C. 

Christopher D. McIver 
North Vancouver, B.C. 

Sean P. McLaren 
Collierville, Tennessee 

Tom V. Theodorakis 
Vancouver, B.C. 

Christopher A. Virostek 
North Vancouver, B.C. 

Chuck H. Watkins 
Memphis, Tennessee 

Office Held 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating 
Officer 

Vice-President, Canadian Lumber 

Vice-President, Pulp and Energy Operations 

Vice-President, Canadian Woodlands 

Vice-President, Corporate and Government 
Relations 

Vice-President, Corporate Controller and Investor 
Relations 

Vice-President, Sales and Marketing 

Vice-President, U.S. Lumber 

Secretary 
Partner, McMillan LLP (lawyers) 

Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer 

Vice-President, U.S. Lumber Manufacturing 

- 27 - 

Each officer has held the same or a similar office with the organization indicated or a 
predecessor thereof for the last five years except for Ted Seraphim (see disclosure under 
“Directors”); Raymond W. Ferris, who before February 15, 2016 was our Vice-President, Wood 
Products; Brian A. Balkwill, who before February 15, 2016 was our General Manager, Canadian 
Lumber, before December 1, 2014 was our General Manager, Engineered Wood and before 
April 1, 2012 was our General Manager, Sundre sawmill; Keith D. Carter, who before 
February 15, 2016 was our General Manager, Pulp Operations, before September 1, 2014 was 
our Operations Manager, Mechanical Pulp and before February 1, 2014 was our General 
Manager, Quesnel River Pulp; Larry E. Gardner, who before February 16, 2016 was our General 
Manager, Canadian Woodlands and before December 1, 2014 was our Chief Forester, British 
Columbia; James W. Gorman, who before May 19, 2015 was President and Chief Executive 
Officer of the Council of Forest Industries and before September 16, 2013 served in a number of 
senior leadership roles with the Government of British Columbia; Rodger M. Hutchinson, who 
before February 13, 2014 was our Vice-President, Corporate Controller; Christopher D. McIver, 
who before February 16, 2016 was our Vice-President, Lumber Sales and Corporate 
Development; Sean P. McLaren, who before February 15, 2016 was our Vice-President, U.S. 
Lumber Operations; Christopher A. Virostek, who before April 1, 2017 was the Senior 
Vice-President of Strategy and Corporate Development of Masonite International Corporation; 
and Chuck H. Watkins, who before February 15, 2016 was our General Manager, U.S. Lumber 
Manufacturing, before August 18, 2015 was our Regional Manager, U.S. Lumber, before 
December 6, 2013 was our Engineering and Technical Manager, U.S. lumber and before 
September 24, 2012 was Director of Operations at Rex Lumber Corporation.  

Shareholdings of Directors and Officers 

The directors and officers of the Company as a group, beneficially owned or controlled or 
directed, directly or indirectly, the following shares of the Company: 

Common shares 
% of total Common shares 
Class B Common shares 
% of total Class B Common shares 
% of all shares outstanding 

Governance 

December 31, 2017 
1,395,821 
2% 
78,728 
3% 
2% 

December 31, 2016 
1,461,762 
2% 
78,728 
3% 
2% 

Corporate governance is guided by our Corporate Governance Policy, a copy of which may be 
viewed on our web site:  www.westfraser.com.  The Board of Directors has established a 
Governance & Nominating Committee comprised of all non-management directors.  The 
Committee provides support for the stewardship and governance role of the Board in reviewing 
and making recommendations on the composition of the Board, the functioning of the Board and 
its committees, succession planning and all other corporate governance matters and practices.  
On the occasion of each regularly-scheduled meeting of the Board in 2017, the Committee met 
without management representatives present and reviewed these and other issues. 

 
 
- 28 - 

The Corporate Governance Policy includes a Code of Conduct which sets out our policies and 
requirements relating to, among other categories, legal compliance, safety, environmental 
stewardship, human rights, anti-corruption and whistleblowing.  Additional information is 
available on our website www.westfraser.com under Corporate Governance. 

Audit Committee 

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to 
oversee our financial reporting and audit process.  The full text of the Audit Committee’s Charter 
is attached as Schedule 1. 

Members 

The following identifies each current member of the Audit Committee, and the education and 
experience of each member that is relevant to the performance of the member’s responsibilities 
as an Audit Committee member.  All members of the Audit Committee are considered 
“independent” and “financially literate” within the meaning of NI 52-110. 

Reid E. Carter 

Mr. Carter holds a combined undergraduate degree in Forestry and Biology and a master’s 
degree in Forest Soils.  He is president of a large timberlands investment firm and has been 
involved with that firm and related firms in various senior roles for the last 14 years.  Prior to 
that he served as National Bank Financial’s Paper and Forest Products Analyst. 

Gerald J. Miller 

Mr. Miller, who holds a Bachelor of Commerce, is a Chartered Professional Accountant, 
Chartered Accountant.  He spent 25 years in various roles at West Fraser until his retirement in 
2011.  While at West Fraser he served in a number of executive positions including 
Vice-President Finance and Chief Financial Officer.  Mr. Miller is currently the Chair of the 
audit committee of Granite Real Estate Investment Trust. 

Janice G. Rennie 

Ms. Rennie, who holds a Bachelor of Commerce, is a Chartered Professional Accountant, 
Chartered Accountant.  She was elected as Fellow of the Chartered Accountants in 1998.  
Ms. Rennie has chaired or been a member of several audit committees of public companies in the 
past and currently is a member of the audit committees of Methanex Corporation, Major Drilling 
Group International Inc. and WestJet Airlines Ltd. 

Gillian D. Winckler 

Ms. Winckler, who holds a Bachelor of Science and Bachelor of Commerce obtained in South 
Africa, is a Chartered Accountant (South Africa).  Ms. Winckler worked in the audit profession 
for five years, in corporate finance for five years, and in a number of executive positions with 
Coalspur Limited and BHP Billiton.  Ms. Winckler is currently a member of the audit committee 
of Pan American Silver Corporation.  

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures 

- 29 - 

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy that sets out the pre-approval requirements related to 
services to be performed by our independent auditors.  The policy provides that the Committee 
will annually review proposed audit, audit-related, tax and other services (to be submitted by the 
Chief Financial Officer and the independent auditor), and will provide general approval of 
described services, usually including specific maximum fee amounts. 

Unless a service has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the 
Committee.  The Committee is permitted to delegate pre-approval authority to any of its 
members.  The Committee reports on the pre-approval process to the full Board of Directors 
from time to time. 

Fees Paid to Auditors 
($ thousands) 
Audit Fees1 
Audit-Related Fees2 
Tax Fees 
Other 
1.  Represents actual and estimated fees related to fiscal year ends. 
2. 

2017 
854 
162 
548 
50 

2016 
833 
160 
326 
85 

For assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit but are not reported as “Audit Fees”. 

Material Contracts 

On October 15, 2014, we issued US$300 million of fixed-rate senior unsecured notes due 

1. 
October 15, 2024 pursuant to a private placement in the U.S.  The notes bear interest of 4.35% 
with semi-annual payments commencing on April 15, 2015 and are redeemable, in whole or in 
part, at our option at any time.  In the event of a change in control in respect of the Company 
which is followed within 60 days by ratings downgrades to below investment grade in certain 
circumstances, unless we have exercised the right to redeem all of the notes, each holder will 
have the right to require us to repurchase all or any part of such holder’s notes at a purchase price 
in cash equal to 101% of the principal amount of the notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest. 

On August 25, 2017, we replaced our existing 2007 Credit Agreement with a new 2017 

2. 
Credit Agreement.  The new credit agreement is comprised of a CDN$500 million committed 
revolving credit facility and a US$200 million five year non-revolving term acquisition facility 
which expires on August 25, 2022.  The committed revolving credit facility provides for floating 
rates of interest based on Prime, Base Rate Advances, Bankers’ Acceptances or LIBOR 
Advances at our option.  The five year non-revolving term facility provides for floating rates of 
interest based on Base Rate Advances or LIBOR Advances at our option.  On August 28, 2017 
we borrowed US$200 million under the non-revolving term facility to fund part of the Gilman 
Acquisition.  These borrowings are repayable at any time, in whole or in part, at our option and 
without penalty but cannot be redrawn after payment. 

On July 26, 2017, we entered into a share purchase agreement to acquire from the 

3. 
Howard Gilman Foundation and other shareholders, the Gilman Companies which owned six 
sawmills and a finger joint mill in Florida and Georgia as well as an administrative office in St. 

- 30 - 

Marys, Georgia.  The Gilman Acquisition was completed on August 31, 2017 for net cash 
consideration of $526 million (US$419 million). 

Additional Information 

Additional information, including directors’ and officers’ remuneration and indebtedness, 
principal holders of our securities and securities authorized for issuance under equity 
compensation plans, will be contained in the Information Circular for the annual general meeting 
of the Company to be held on April 19, 2018.  Additional financial information is provided in 
our annual consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion & Analysis for the 
year ended December 31, 2017. 

Copies of our Annual Report, which will include this Annual Information Form and the 
documents incorporated by reference herein, our annual consolidated financial statements 
(including the auditor’s report) for the year ended December 31, 2017 and our Information 
Circular may be obtained at any time upon request from us once these documents have been 
published, but we may require the payment of a reasonable charge if the request is made by a 
person who is not a security holder of the Company. 

This Annual Information Form, our Annual Report (once published) and additional information 
concerning the Company may also be obtained on our website www.westfraser.com and on the 
System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) at www.sedar.com. 

 
 
- 31 - 

Schedule 1 – Audit Committee Charter 

The Audit Committee Charter, which is set out below, was approved by the Board on September 12, 2017. 

General Mandate 

To assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee the Company’s financial reporting and audit processes, 
its system of internal controls and its process for monitoring compliance with applicable financial reporting and 
disclosure laws and its own policies. 

Responsibilities 

The Committee will carry out the following responsibilities: 

Financial Statements 

  Review significant accounting and financial reporting issues, including complex or unusual transactions, 

significant contingencies and highly judgmental areas, and recent professional and regulatory pronouncements, 
and understand their impact on the Company’s financial statements. 

  Review the interim financial reports (including financial statements, management’s discussion and analysis and 
related news releases) with management and the auditors, consider whether they are complete and consistent 
with the information known to Committee members and either provide a recommendation to the Board with 
respect to the approval of the interim financial reports or, if so delegated by the Board, approve the interim 
financial reports and the filing of the same together with all required documents and information with 
regulators. 

  Understand how management develops interim financial information, and the nature and extent of auditor 

involvement. 

  Review with management and the auditors the results of the audit, including any difficulties encountered. 

  Review the annual financial statements, the annual management discussion and analysis and related news 

releases, and consider whether they are complete, consistent with information known to Committee members, 
and reflect appropriate accounting principles, and provide a recommendation to the Board with respect to the 
approval of the statements, the management discussion and analysis and the news release. 

  Review with management and the auditors all matters required to be communicated to the Committee under 

generally accepted auditing standards. 

Internal Control 

  Require management of the Company to implement and maintain appropriate internal control procedures over 

annual and interim financial reporting. 

  Review with management and auditors the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over 
annual and interim financial reporting, including information technology security and control and controls 
related to the prevention and detection of fraud and improper or illegal transactions or payments, the status of 
the remediation of any identified control deficiencies, and elicit recommendations for improvements. 

  Understand the scope of the auditors’ review of internal control over financial reporting, and obtain and review 
reports on significant findings and recommendations, including respecting the Company’s accounting principles 
or changes to such principles or their application and the treatment of financial information discussed with 
management, together with management’s responses. 

- 32 - 

Audit 

  Review the auditors’ proposed audit scope and approach. 

  Review the performance of the auditors, and provide a recommendation to the Board with respect to the 

nomination of the auditors for appointment and remuneration. 

  Review and confirm the independence of the auditors by obtaining statements from the auditors on relationships 
between the auditors and the Company, including non-audit services, and discussing the relationships with the 
auditors. 

  Periodically evaluate the need for the establishment of an internal audit function and make appropriate 

recommendations to the Board. 

Compliance 

  Review with management the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s systems for monitoring compliance 
with financial reporting and disclosure laws, including the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, and 
the results of management’s investigation and follow-up (including disciplinary action) of any instances of 
non-compliance. 

  Review the findings of any examinations by regulatory agencies, and any auditor observations. 

  Obtain regular updates from management and Company legal counsel regarding compliance matters. 

Reporting Requirements 

  Regularly report to the Board about Committee activities, issues and related recommendations. 

  Provide an open avenue of communication between the auditors and the Board. 

  Review any reports the Company issues that relate to Committee responsibilities. 

Other Responsibilities 

 

Institute and oversee special investigations as needed. 

  Develop and implement a policy for the approval of the provision of non-audit services by the auditors and 

assessing the independence of the auditors in the context of these engagements. 

  Establish procedures for: (a) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received regarding non-

compliance with the Company’s Code of Conduct, violations of laws or regulations, or concerns regarding 
accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters; and (b) the confidential, anonymous submission by 
officers or employees of the Company or by other persons of concerns regarding questionable accounting, 
auditing or financial reporting and disclosure matters or non-compliance with the Company’s Code of Conduct 
or other matters that are of a sensitive or “whistleblower” nature. 

  Assist the Board with its responsibility to, with the advice of management, identify the principal financial and 
audit risks of the Company and establish systems and procedures to ensure these principal financial and audit 
risks are monitored, and to make recommendations to the Board. 

  Annually review the expenses of the Chief Executive Officer. 

  Perform other activities related to this charter as requested by the Board. 

- 33 - 

  Review and assess the adequacy of this charter annually, requesting Board approval for proposed changes. 

  Review terms of any Code of Conduct established by the Board and respond to any related compliance issues. 

  Confirm annually to the Board that all responsibilities outlined in this charter have been carried out. 

Qualifications and Procedures 

  The composition of the Committee will comply with applicable laws including requirements for independence, 

unrelated to management, financial literacy and audit experience. 

  The Chair of the Committee will be designated by the Board. 

  The Committee will meet at least four times annually, and more frequently as circumstances dictate, and the 

CFO and a representative of the auditors should be available on request to attend all meetings. 

  The Committee should meet privately in executive session with representatives of each of management and of 
the auditors to discuss any matters of concern to the Committee or such members, including any post-audit 
management letter. 

  The Committee may retain any outside advisor at the expense of the Company, without the Board’s approval, at 

any time and has the authority to determine any such advisor’s fees and other retention terms. 

  Minutes of each meeting should be prepared, approved by the Committee and circulated to the full Board. 

- 34 - 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS 

Introduction and Interpretation 

This discussion and analysis by West Fraser’s management (“MD&A”) of West Fraser’s 
financial performance during 2017 and the fourth quarter of 2017 should be read in conjunction 
with the 2017 annual audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes (the 
“Financial Statements”).  Dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian currency, unless otherwise 
indicated. 

The financial information contained in this MD&A has been prepared in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). 

This MD&A contains historical information, descriptions of current circumstances and 
statements about potential future developments and anticipated financial results.  The latter, 
which are forward-looking statements, are presented to provide reasonable guidance to the reader 
but their accuracy depends on a number of assumptions and is subject to various risks and 
uncertainties.  Forward-looking statements are included under the headings “Recent 
Developments – Softwood lumber dispute” (administrative review and adjustments of duty 
rates), “Recent Developments – U.S. Tax Reform” (expectations for U.S. federal income tax 
payments and tax expense), “Capital Expenditures” (expected completion of sawmill rebuilds 
and upgrades) and “Business Outlook”.  Actual outcomes and results of these statements will 
depend on a number of factors including those matters described under “Risks and 
Uncertainties”, and may differ materially from those anticipated or projected.  Accordingly, 
readers should exercise caution in relying upon forward-looking statements and we undertake no 
obligation to publicly revise them to reflect subsequent events or circumstances except as 
required by applicable securities laws. 

Throughout this MD&A reference is made to Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted earnings and 
Adjusted earnings per share and net debt to total capital ratio (collectively “these measures”), 
calculated as shown under the heading “Non-IFRS Measures”.  We believe that, in addition to 
earnings, these measures are useful performance indicators.  These measures are not generally 
accepted earnings measures under IFRS and do not have standardized meanings prescribed by 
IFRS.  Investors are cautioned that none of these measures should be considered as an alternative 
to earnings, earnings per share (“EPS”) or cash flow, as determined in accordance with IFRS.  
As there is no standardized method of calculating any of these measures, our method of 
calculating each of them may differ from the methods used by other entities and, accordingly, 
our use of any of these measures may not be directly comparable to similarly titled measures 
used by other entities. 

This MD&A includes references to benchmark prices over selected periods for products of the 
type produced by West Fraser.  These benchmark prices do not necessarily reflect the prices 
obtained by West Fraser for those products during such period.  The information in this MD&A 
is as at February 14, 2018 unless otherwise indicated. 

For definitions of various abbreviations and technical terms used in this MD&A please see the 
Glossary of Industry Terms found in our most recent Annual Report. 

- 35 - 

Recent Developments 

Softwood lumber dispute 

On November 25, 2016 a coalition of U.S. lumber producers petitioned the U.S. Department of 
Commerce (“USDOC”) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) to investigate 
alleged subsidies to Canadian softwood lumber producers and levy countervailing and 
antidumping duties against Canadian softwood lumber imports.  We were chosen by the USDOC 
as a “mandatory respondent” to both the countervailing and antidumping investigations and as a 
result have received unique company specific rates. 

On April 24, 2017, the USDOC issued its preliminary determination in the countervailing duty 
(“CVD”) investigation and imposed a company specific preliminary rate of 24.12% to be posted 
by cash deposits on the exports from Canada of softwood lumber to the U.S. on or after April 28, 
2017.  On June 26, 2017, the USDOC issued its preliminary determination in the antidumping 
duty (“ADD”) investigation and imposed a company specific preliminary rate of 6.76% to be 
posted by cash deposits on the exports from Canada of softwood lumber to the U.S. on or after 
June 30, 2017.  The requirement that we deposit CVD was suspended on August 24, 2017 until 
final determination was published by the USITC.  On December 4, 2017 the USDOC amended 
our CVD rate to 17.99% and our ADD rate to 5.57%.  Effective December 28, 2017 we began 
posting cash deposits for CVD and effective December 4, 2017 we began posting cash deposits 
for ADD at the revised rates.  The CVD and ADD rates are subject to further adjustment through 
administrative reviews to be completed by the USDOC.  The administrative reviews for each of 
CVD and ADD are expected to commence in January 2019 and cover the periods from initiation 
of duties to December 31, 2017 for CVD and to November 30, 2018 for ADD.  The reviews may 
not be finalized until June 2020 or later and the results are subject to appeals. 

Duties of $48 million have been expensed for 2017 with an additional $37 million of duty 
deposits recorded as a long-term asset on our balance sheet.  The expensed amount is comprised 
of CVD at the final rate assigned of 17.99% and ADD at our estimated rate.  Our estimated rate 
was determined based on applying the USDOC methodology to our actual financial results for 
June 30, 2017 to December 31, 2017. 

We, together with other Canadian forest product companies and the Canadian federal and 
provincial governments (the “Canadian Interests”) categorically deny the allegations by the 
coalition of U.S. lumber producers and disagree with the countervailing and antidumping 
determinations by the USDOC and the USITC.  The Canadian Interests continue to aggressively 
defend the Canadian industry in this trade dispute and have appealed the decisions to North 
America Free Trade Agreement panels and the World Trade Organization. 

The duty rates are subject to change based on administrative reviews and appeals available to us.  
Notwithstanding the deposit rates assigned under the investigations, our final liability for the 
assessment of CVD and ADD will not be determined until each annual administrative review 
process is complete and related appeal processes are concluded. 

Forest fires in British Columbia 

- 36 - 

The 2017 wildfire season is considered to have been the worst in British Columbia’s history with 
the provincial state of emergency lasting from July 7 to September 15, 2017.  Many communities 
were evacuated including those where our 100 Mile House, Williams Lake and Chasm facilities 
are located.  We were fortunate that our facilities were undamaged but the disruption caused us 
to lose 55 MMFBM of lumber production and 15 MSF of plywood production while the mills 
were closed. 

Throughout this period our British Columbia facilities faced logging restrictions, transportation 
delays and many of our employees were displaced.  As a result of the interruptions, log 
inventories remain below target levels at many locations for this time of the year. 

The province of British Columbia estimates that approximately 1 million hectares of timber has 
been lost due to the forest fires.  We are working with the government to revise our current and 
long-term logging plans, including plans to access and salvage burned timber.  At this time it is 
too early to gauge the long-term impact on lumber operations in British Columbia. 

Gilman Acquisition 

On August 31, 2017 we completed the acquisition of six sawmills and a finger-joint mill (the 
“Gilman Acquisition”) for net cash consideration of $526 million (US$419 million).  These SYP 
mills are located in Florida and Georgia and have an annual lumber production capacity of 
approximately 700 million board feet.  After considering estimated tax benefits, the purchase 
price represents approximately six times trailing 12 months EBITDA of the acquired operations. 

The Gilman Acquisition was financed with cash on hand, borrowings under our revolving credit 
facility, and a new $250 million (US$200 million) acquisition term loan which matures on 
August 25, 2022, and is pre-payable at our option without penalty. 

This acquisition represents an important step in increasing our geographic diversification through 
an expansion of our U.S. lumber operations.  We are pleased to have acquired a group of high 
quality sawmills in a good timber basket, with high operating margins, close to a large customer 
base and with a strong management team that is excited to join West Fraser.  Integration of the 
acquired mills is well underway with the migration of information technology systems and 
organizational alignment largely completed. 

U.S. Tax Reform 

On December 21, 2017 the U.S. federal government enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“U.S. 
Tax Reform”).  The significant features that impact us are the following: 

The federal corporate tax rate is permanently reduced from 35% to 21% for tax years 

1. 
beginning after 2017; 

Businesses will be allowed to immediately expense the cost of qualified property 

2. 
acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017 and before January 1, 2023 (to be 
phased out thereafter); and 

- 37 - 

3. 

The deduction for certain related party payments will be denied.  

U.S. Tax Reform is expected to be positive for us due to the tax rate reduction and our capital 
expenditure plans for our U.S. operations.  With the immediate deduction for qualified 
expenditures and our remaining net operating loss carryforwards we expect federal income tax 
payments to be minimal over the near term.  In addition the tax expense related to our U.S. 
operations will be reduced due to the lower tax rate.  The benefit of the lower tax rate is offset in 
part by the elimination of the deduction of certain interest expenses. 

Summary Information - Annual Results 

Financial Comparisons ($millions, except as otherwise indicated) 
Year ended December 31 
Sales by segment 
Lumber 
Panels 
Pulp & Paper 
Intracompany fibre sales 
Total 

3,671 
600 
988 
 (125) 
5,134 

2017 

Adjusted EBITDA 
Export duties 
Amortization 
Equity-based compensation 
Operating earnings 

Operating earnings by segment 
Lumber 
Panels 
Pulp & Paper 
Corporate and Other 
Total 

Earnings  
Basic earnings per share ($)  
Diluted earnings per share ($) 
Cash dividends declared per share ($) 
Total assets 
Long-term debt1 
Cdn$1.00 converted to US$ – average 
1. 

Includes current portion of long-term debt. 

1,160 
(48) 
(210) 
(32) 
870 

681 
100 
132 
(43) 
870 

596 
7.63 
7.63 
0.36 
4,517 
636 
0.771 

2016 

2015 

3,145 
529 
887 
(111) 
4,450 

674 
- 
(197) 
5 
482 

362 
77 
42 
1 
482 

326 
4.06 
3.90 
0.28 
3,600 
413 
0.755 

2,764 
554 
900 
(118) 
4,100 

417 
- 
(191) 
23 
249 

105 
82 
41 
21 
249 

104 
1.25 
0.89 
0.28 
3,635 
423 
0.782 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 38 - 

Selected Quarterly Information 
($millions, except earnings per share (“EPS”) amounts which are in $) 

Sales 
Earnings  
Basic EPS 
Diluted EPS 

Q4-17  Q3-17  Q2-17  Q1-17  Q4-16  Q3-16  Q2-16  Q1-16 
1,077 
1,376 
42 
207 
0.51 
2.66 
0.50 
2.66 

1,247 
120 
1.53 
1.53 

1,155 
107 
1.35 
1.35 

1,111 
98 
1.22 
0.86 

1,322 
146 
1.86 
1.86 

1,107 
79 
1.01 
1.01 

1,189 
123 
1.58 
1.58 

Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Basic Earnings Per Share 
($millions, except EPS amounts which are in $) 

Earnings  
Add:  

Export duties 
Equity-based compensation 
Exchange gain on long-term financing 
Loss on power agreements 
Insurance gain on disposal of equipment 
  Net tax effect on the above adjustments 
  Re-measurement of deferred income tax assets and 

liabilities  

2017 

596 

48 
32 
(10) 
- 
(7) 
(6) 

6 
659 
8.44 

2016 

326 

- 
(5) 
(4) 
27 
(8) 
(6) 

- 
330 
4.11 

Adjusted earnings  
Adjusted basic EPS1  
1.  Adjusted basic EPS is calculated by dividing Adjusted earnings by the basic weighted average shares outstanding. 

Earnings in 2017 increased compared to results for 2016.  Our results include several significant 
non-operational items that are identified as adjustments in the above table.  After taking into 
account these adjustments, we generated Adjusted earnings of $659 million compared to $330 
million in 2016.  For a description of operational results see “Discussion & Analysis by Product 
Segment” which follows this section. 

Export duties of $48 million were expensed in the year related to countervailing and antidumping 
duties levied by the USDOC in respect of U.S. lumber producers’ allegations of subsidies and 
dumping against Canadian softwood lumber imports.  We believe the allegations are 
unwarranted and that the rates applied will be adjusted.  See “Softwood lumber dispute” under 
the heading “Recent Developments” in this MD&A for further information. 

In 2017 an expense of $32 million was recorded related to equity-based compensation compared 
to a recovery of $5 million in 2016.  Our equity-based compensation includes our share purchase 
option, phantom share unit, and directors’ deferred share unit plans (the “Plans”), all of which 
have been partially hedged by an equity derivatives contract.  The equity derivatives contract had 
the effect of hedging 1,000,000 equity-based securities at a share price of $46.02.  The Plans are 
fair valued each period end and the resulting expense or recovery is recorded over the related 
vesting period.  Our fair valuation models consider various factors with the most significant 
being the change in the market value of our shares from the beginning to the end of the relevant 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 39 - 

period.  The market value of the Company’s shares increased by 62%, from $48.01 per share at 
the end of 2016 to $77.57 per share at the end of 2017.  The expense or recovery does not 
necessarily represent the actual amount that will ultimately be paid in respect of options and 
units. 

Any change in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the value of the U.S. dollar results in 
the revaluation of our U.S. dollar-denominated assets and liabilities.  The results of these 
revaluations are included in other income.  The Canadian dollar was stronger against the U.S. 
dollar at the close of 2017 compared to the close of 2016 resulting in a foreign exchange gain on 
long-term financing as shown in the above table.  Exchange gains or losses on working capital 
are identified under “Other Non-operational Items” below. 

During 2016 we terminated and finalized the settlement for our three-year power strip agreement 
and our Power Purchase Agreements.  These agreements had provided us with a portion of the 
electricity generated from two power plants in Alberta at substantially predetermined prices.  The 
termination resulted in a $27 million loss that was recorded in other income in 2016. 

An insurance gain related to involuntary disposal of equipment was recorded in 2017 and 2016.  
The 2017 gain relates to equipment at our jointly-owned NBSK plant in Quesnel and the 2016 
gain related to our WestPine MDF facility. 

U.S. Tax Reform and an increase in the province of British Columbia tax rate from 11% to 12% 
were substantively enacted in 2017 resulting in a one-time increase to deferred income tax 
expense of $6 million associated with the re-measurement of deferred income tax assets and 
liabilities. 

Other Non-operational Items 

Other income includes an exchange loss on working capital of $10 million compared to $4 
million in 2016. 

The results of the current year include a provision for income tax of $250 million compared to 
$118 million in 2016.  The effective tax rate was 30% in the current year compared to 27% in 
2016.  Note 18 to the Financial Statements provides a reconciliation of income taxes calculated 
at the British Columbia statutory rate to the income tax expense. 

The funded position of our defined benefit pension plans and other retirement benefit plans is 
estimated at the end of each period.  The funded position, as shown in Note 13 to the Financial 
Statements, is determined by subtracting the value of plan assets from the value of plan 
obligations.  The effect of a decrease in the discount rate used to calculate plan liabilities from 
the beginning of the current year, partially offset by the actual rate of return on assets that was 
higher than the discount rate, resulted in an after-tax actuarial loss of $26 million which is 
included in other comprehensive earnings. 

Discussion & Analysis by Product Segment 

- 40 - 

Lumber Segment 

SPF (MMfbm) 
Production 
Shipments 
SYP (MMfbm) 
Production 
Shipments 

Wood chip production 
SPF (M ODTs) 
SYP (M green tons) 

Sales ($millions) 
Lumber 
Wood chips and other residuals 
Logs and other 

Adjusted EBITDA ($millions) 
Export duties 
Amortization ($millions) 
Operating earnings ($millions) 
Adjusted EBITDA margin (%) 
Capital expenditures ($millions) 
Acquisition ($millions) 
Benchmark prices (per Mfbm) 

SPF #2 & Better 2x41 – US$ 
SPF #3 Utility 2x41 – US$ 
SYP #2 West 2x42 – US$ 
SPF #2 & Better 2x4 – Cdn$3 
SPF #3 Utility 2x4 – Cdn$3 
SYP #2 West 2x4 – Cdn$3 
Source: Random Lengths – Net FOB mill. 
Source: Random Lengths – Net FOB mill Westside. 

2017 

2016 

3,809 
3,714 

2,424 
2,387 

1,765 
3,113 

3,219 
344 
108 
3,671 

884 
(48) 
(155) 
681 
24 
247 
526 

401 
323 
433 
521 
419 
562 

3,796 
3,878 

2,139 
2,126 

1,895 
2,669 

2,731 
319 
95 
3,145 

508 
- 
(146) 
362 
16 
195 
- 

305 
240 
409 
404 
318 
542 

1. 
2. 
3.  Calculated by applying the average Canadian/U.S. dollar exchange rate for the period to the U.S. dollar benchmark price. 

Production of SPF lumber in 2017 was similar to 2016 levels despite the 2017 B.C. wildfires 
which reduced production by approximately 55 MMfbm.  Shipments of SPF lumber were lower 
than last year and lower than 2017 production as a result of transportation delays and temporary 
production interruptions as we executed mill equipment upgrades. Production of SYP lumber 
increased by 285 MMfbm over 2016 with the mills acquired on August 31, 2017 in the Gilman 
Acquisition contributing 203 MMfbm of this total.  Shipments of SYP lumber increased over 
2016 levels due to the increased 2017 production.  The increased SYP wood chip production was 
primarily the result of the addition of the Gilman mills.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 41 - 

Our SPF sales continue to be primarily to North American markets with the U.S. market being 
the most significant destination.  The percentage of SPF sales by volume to the U.S. remained 
similar to 2016 levels.  New housing in the U.S. continues to increase slowly with single family 
starts improving in 2017.  Single family home starts are particularly important to lumber 
consumption as each such start uses approximately three times as much lumber as a multi-family 
start.  The percentage of single family starts to overall home starts increased to 70% in 2017 
from 67% in 2016.  SPF sales by volume to offshore markets also remained similar to 2016 
levels.  The table below sets out the proportion of our Canadian lumber by volume sold by 
destination in each of 2017 and 2016. 

SPF Sales by Destination 

U.S. 
Canada 
China 
Other 
Total 

2017 

2016 

MMfbm 
2,161 
895 
457 
201 
3,714 

% 
58 
24 
12 
6 

MMfbm 
2,258 
917 
466 
237 
3,878 

% 
58 
24 
12 
6 

As discussed previously, we completed the acquisition of six sawmills and a finger-joint mill on 
August 31, 2017 for net cash consideration of $526 million.  Purchase price accounting requires 
that inventory is valued at fair value, which approximates selling prices.  After accounting for the 
increased value assigned to the acquired inventory and costs associated with the rapid integration 
of systems, the acquired operations generated operating earnings of $15 million since 
acquisition. 

Operating earnings from our lumber segment were significantly higher than 2016.  Improved 
lumber pricing combined with higher shipments drove the improved results.  This was partially 
offset by export duties expense of $48 million in 2017 and higher Canadian log costs in 2017 
compared to 2016.  Purchased log costs continued to increase in B.C., reflecting increased 
competition for the decreasing amount of available logs in pine beetle-affected areas and the 
impact of the 2017 B.C. wildfires.  U.S. log costs remained stable in most of our operating areas 
compared to 2016. 

 
 
 
 
- 42 - 

Panels Segment 

Plywood (MMsf 3/8” basis) 
Production 
Shipments 
MDF (MMsf 3/4” basis) 
Production 
Shipments 
LVL (Mcf) 
Production 
Shipments 

Sales ($millions) 

Finished products 
Wood chips and other residuals 
Logs and other 

Adjusted EBITDA ($millions) 
Amortization ($millions) 
Operating earnings ($millions) 
Adjusted EBITDA margin (%) 
Capital expenditures ($millions) 
Benchmark prices 

Plywood (per Msf 3/8” basis)1 Cdn$ 
Source: Crow’s Market Report – Delivered Toronto. 

1. 

2017 

2016 

838 
826 

191 
182 

826 
826 

160 
167 

2,676 
2,601 

2,215 
2,226 

575 
17 
8 
600 

113 
(13) 
100 
19 
22 

509 

505 
18 
6 
529 

89 
(12) 
77 
17 
25 

432 

The panels segment is comprised of our three plywood operations, two MDF operations and one 
LVL operation.  All are located in western Canada. 

Plywood production was slightly higher than 2016 despite production losses of 15 MMsf in 2017 
due to the B.C. wildfires.  MDF production increased due to the re-start of our WestPine MDF 
plant on April 29, 2017 after a fire-related closure in March 2016, while LVL production 
increased as a result of improving market demand. 

Operating earnings from our panels segment increased compared to 2016 levels due to the 
significant increase in plywood prices on a year over year basis.  The plywood market was strong 
throughout the year with record prices being achieved in the third quarter due to strong Canadian 
demand and fears of supply shortages caused by the B.C. fires.  Most of the plywood we produce 
is sold to customers in Canada where both new home construction and renovation and repair 
markets remained strong. 

Operating earnings from our MDF operations were reduced from 2016 levels while operating 
earnings from LVL improved slightly from 2016 levels.  MDF results were negatively impacted 
by the start-up of our WestPine facility following the fire at this facility in 2016.  LVL is used 
predominantly in single-family home construction which continued to improve in 2017. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 43 - 

Pulp & Paper Segment 

BCTMP (Mtonnes) 
Production 
Shipments 
NBSK (Mtonnes) 
Production 
Shipments 
Newsprint (Mtonnes) 
Production 
Shipments 

Sales ($millions) 

2017 

2016 

674 
670 

498 
497 

122 
123 

988 

665 
653 

527 
526 

128 
129 

887 

79 
(37) 
42 
9 
42 

172 
(40) 
132 
17 
58 

Adjusted EBITDA ($millions) 
Amortization ($millions) 
Operating earnings ($millions) 
Adjusted EBITDA margin (%) 
Capital expenditures ($millions) 
Benchmark prices (per tonne) 
  NBSK U.S. - US$1,3  
  NBSK China - US$2,3  
  Newsprint - US$4 
  NBSK U.S. - Cdn$5  
  NBSK China - Cdn$5  
  Newsprint - Cdn$5 
1. 
2. 
3. 
discounts from the U.S. list price for North American sales compared to relatively small discounts from the China list price for sales into China.  
4. 
5.  Calculated by applying the average Canadian/U.S. dollar exchange rate for the period to the U.S. dollar benchmark price. 

Source: Resource Information Systems, Inc. – U.S. list price, delivered U.S. 
Source: Resource Information Systems, Inc. – China list price, delivered China 
The differences between the U.S. and China NBSK list prices are largely attributable to the customary sales practice of applying material 

978 
599 
560 
1,295 
793 
742 

1,105 
712 
584 
1,433 
923 
757 

Source: Resource Information Systems, Inc. – delivered U.S. 48.8 gram. 

The pulp & paper segment is comprised of our NBSK, BCTMP and newsprint businesses. 

BCTMP production was slightly higher than 2016 levels with our BCTMP mill in Slave Lake, 
Alberta achieving record production.  NBSK production decreased by 6% compared to 2016 
mostly relating to major shutdowns that occurred at each of our NBSK facilities.  Our Cariboo 
Pulp jointly-owned mill took its major shutdown in the second quarter for 12 days resulting in 
reduced production of 5,600 tonnes.  Our Hinton mill took its major shutdown in the third 
quarter with an extension into the beginning of the fourth quarter for some unforeseen work.  In 
all, the Hinton mill reduced production by 22,700 tonnes over the shutdown that lasted 21 days.  
Newsprint production was slightly lower in the year compared to 2016. 

Operating earnings for the segment improved significantly from 2016 levels.  Our BCTMP 
results made up the majority of the improvement while the NBSK improvement, while still 
significant, was more muted due to the maintenance shutdowns.  Pulp prices improved 
significantly over 2016 due to strong demand predominantly from China.  Improved results due 
to pricing were partially offset by increased fibre costs and higher electricity costs.  Newsprint 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 44 - 

operating earnings were lower in 2017 compared to 2016 due to lower shipments combined with 
lower realized prices and higher fibre and power costs. 

4th Quarter Results 

Sales and Earnings Comparison 
($millions, except as otherwise indicated) 

Sales by Segment 
Lumber 
Panels 
Pulp & Paper 
Intracompany fibre sales 
Total 
Operating Earnings by Segment 
Lumber 
Panels 
Pulp & Paper 
Corporate & Other 
Operating earnings 
Finance expense 
Other  
Tax provision 
Earnings 
Cdn$1.00 converted to US$ – average 

Q4–17 

Q3–17 

Q4–16 

1,000 
155 
253 
(32) 
1,376 

232 
20 
48 
(7) 
293 
(8) 
10 
(88) 
207 
0.787 

889 
168 
221 
(31) 
1,247 

126 
45 
21 
(15) 
177 
(8) 
(2) 
(47) 
120 
0.798 

778 
124 
231 
(26) 
1,107 

107 
17 
20 
(17) 
127 
(7) 
(1) 
(40) 
79 
0.749 

Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Basic Earnings Per Share 
($millions except EPS amounts which are in $) 

Earnings  
Add:  

Export duties 
Equity-based compensation 

  Exchange loss (gain) on long-term financing 
  Loss on power agreements 

Insurance gain on disposal of equipment 
  Net tax effect on the above adjustments 
Re-measurement of deferred income tax assets and 
liabilities 
Adjusted earnings  
Adjusted basic EPS  

Q4-17 

Q3–17 

Q4–16 

207 

120 

(17) 
6 
(1) 
- 
(7) 
7 

6 
201 
2.58 

31 
10 
(5) 
- 
- 
(6) 

- 
150 
1.93 

79 

- 
16 
4 
8 
(3) 
(3) 

- 
101 
1.28 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 45 - 

Discussion & Analysis of Quarterly Non-operational Items 

For a description of our quarterly operational results see “Discussion & Analysis by Product 
Segment” which follows this section. 

Our results include several significant non-operational items that are identified as adjustments in 
the table immediately preceding this section.  After taking into account the adjustments, we 
generated Adjusted earnings of $201 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 compared to Adjusted 
earnings of $150 million in the previous quarter and Adjusted earnings of $101 million in the 
fourth quarter of 2016. 

During the fourth quarter of 2017 duty deposits of $20 million were made on account of CVD 
and ADD and a long-term export duty deposit receivable of $37 million was recorded.  The 
combination of the receivable less the deposits resulted in a recovery of $17 million being 
recorded through income.  The receivable reflects the reduction in the CVD rate from the 
preliminary rate of 24.12% to a final rate of 17.99% and an adjustment to reflect ADD at our 
estimated rate based on applying the USDOC methodology to our actual financial results for 
June 30, 2017 to December 31, 2017.  See “Softwood lumber dispute” under the heading 
“Recent Developments” in this MD&A for further information. 

For a description of the other key adjustments, see the corresponding section under “Annual 
Results” in this MD&A. 

Discussion & Analysis by Product Segment 

- 46 - 

Lumber Segment 

SPF (MMfbm) 
Production 
Shipments 
SYP (MMfbm) 
Production 
Shipments 

Sales ($millions) 
Lumber 
Wood chips and other residuals 
Logs and other 

Adjusted EBITDA ($millions) 
Export duties ($millions) 
Amortization ($millions) 
Operating earnings ($millions) 
Adjusted EBITDA margin (%) 
Benchmark prices (per Mfbm) 

SPF #2 & Better 2x41 – US$ 
SPF #3 Utility 2x41 – US$ 
SYP #2 West 2x42 – US$ 
SPF #2 & Better 2x4 – Cdn$3 
SPF #3 Utility 2x4 – Cdn$3 
SYP #2 West 2x4 – Cdn$3 
Source: Random Lengths – Net FOB mill. 
Source: Random Lengths – Net FOB mill Westside. 

Q4-17 

Q3-17 

Q4-16 

903 
904 

707 
694 

876 
97 
27 
1,000 

258 
17 
(43) 
232 
26 

462 
346 
438 
587 
440 
557 

924 
934 

602 
621 

782 
84 
23 
889 

195 
(31) 
(38) 
126 
22 

406 
326 
382 
509 
408 
479 

897 
944 

499 
489 

680 
74 
24 
778 

144 
- 
(37) 
107 
19 

315 
261 
432 
420 
348 
576 

1. 
2. 
3.  Calculated by applying the average Canadian/U.S. dollar exchange rate for the period to the U.S. dollar benchmark price. 

Operating earnings increased 84% compared to the previous quarter.  SPF production and 
shipments both declined from the previous quarter due primarily to fewer operating days.  SYP 
production and shipments were up due to the Gilman Acquisition but partially offset by the 
effect of cold weather in some of our operating areas late in the quarter.  The increase in 
operating earnings was driven by higher product prices and the addition of the Gilman lumber 
mills, slightly offset by higher Canadian log costs and manufacturing costs.  Export duties 
expense for the quarter was adjusted based on the final rates for CVD and estimated ADD rates.  
The adjustment resulted in a recovery of duties of $17 million being recorded through income 
compared to an expense of $31 million in the previous quarter. 

Operating earnings were significantly higher in the quarter compared to the fourth quarter of 
2016 mainly due to higher realized lumber prices, particularly for SPF lumber and the addition of 
the Gilman lumber mills.  An additional positive contributor was increased U.S. production and 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 47 - 

shipments in the quarter due to the benefits of several completed capital projects compared to the 
fourth quarter of 2016.   

Panels Segment 

Plywood (MMsf 3/8” basis) 
Production 
Shipments 
MDF (MMsf 3/4” basis) 
Production 
Shipments 
LVL (Mcf) 
Production 
Shipments 

Sales ($millions) 

Finished products 
Wood chips and other residuals 
Logs and other 

Adjusted EBITDA ($millions) 
Amortization ($millions) 
Operating earnings ($millions) 
Adjusted EBITDA margin (%) 
Benchmark prices 

Plywood (per Msf 3/8” basis)1 Cdn$ 
Source: Crow’s Market Report – Delivered Toronto. 

1. 

Q4-17 

Q3-17 

Q4-16 

209 
209 

55 
51 

657 
626 

147 
4 
4 
155 

24 
(4) 
20 
15 

205 
195 

55 
53 

616 
653 

163 
4 
1 
168 

48 
(3) 
45 
29 

207 
207 

35 
34 

584 
556 

119 
4 
1 
124 

20 
(3) 
17 
16 

474 

640 

421 

The decline in operating earnings for our panels segment compared to the previous quarter was 
primarily the result of lower plywood prices reflecting seasonally weaker demand typical of the 
Canadian building industry.  Results from our MDF and LVL business were also lower in the 
current quarter due to slightly higher manufacturing costs. 

Operating earnings for the current quarter compared to the same quarter of 2016 were slightly 
higher.  Plywood earnings were higher in the current quarter due to higher sales prices partially 
offset by higher log costs.  MDF and LVL results were similar quarter to quarter. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pulp & Paper Segment 

BCTMP(Mtonnes) 
Production 
Shipments 
NBSK (Mtonnes) 
Production 
Shipments 
Newsprint (Mtonnes) 
Production 
Shipments 

Sales ($millions) 

- 48 - 

Q4-17 

Q3-17 

Q4-16 

171 
167 

122 
107 

30 
31 

253 

167 
139 

117 
121 

31 
32 

221 

172 
149 

133 
139 

33 
32 

231 

30 
(9) 
21 
14 

60 
(12) 
48 
24 

30 
(10) 
20 
13 

Adjusted EBITDA ($millions) 
Amortization ($millions) 
Operating earnings ($millions) 
Adjusted EBITDA margin (%) 
Benchmark prices (per tonne) 
  NBSK U.S. - US$1,3 
  NBSK China - US$2,3 
  Newsprint - US$4 
  NBSK U.S. - Cdn$5 
  NBSK China - Cdn$5 
  Newsprint - Cdn$5 
Source: Resource Information Systems, Inc. – U.S. list price delivered U.S. 
1. 
Source: Resource Information Systems, Inc. – China list price, delivered China. 
2. 
The differences between the U.S. and China NBSK list prices are largely attributable to the customary sales practice of applying material 
3. 
discounts from the U.S. list price for North American sales compared to relatively small discounts from the China list price for sales into China. 
4. 
5.  Calculated by applying the average Canadian/U.S. dollar exchange rate for the period to the U.S. benchmark price. 

1,110 
670 
575 
1,391 
839 
720 

992 
595 
575 
1,324 
794 
767 

1,183 
863 
610 
1,503 
1,097 
775 

Source: Resource Information Systems, Inc. – delivered 48.8 gram newsprint. 

Operating earnings from our pulp & paper operations increased by $27 million from the previous 
quarter.  Our NBSK and BCTMP operations had improved profitability while the operating 
earnings of our jointly-owned newsprint operation were similar to the previous quarter.  Realized 
pulp sales prices increased significantly from the previous quarter due to substantially improved 
demand from Asia.  Maintenance costs were lower in the quarter compared to last quarter but the 
benefit was offset by higher furnish, chemicals and power costs.  BCTMP results improved due 
to higher shipments early in the quarter due to vessel timing.  We experienced transportation 
delays late in the quarter due to cold weather which contributed to rail car shortages and port 
congestion.   

Operating earnings for the segment were higher than in the fourth quarter of 2016 due to 
improved BCTMP and NBSK results partially offset by lower newsprint results.  The 
improvement in operating earnings from pulp was due to significantly higher product prices due 
to improved demand.  The newsprint results for the fourth quarter of 2016 were negatively 
impacted by a $4 million charge related to the termination of power agreements.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital Expenditures 

- 49 - 

During the year our capital expenditures totaled $336 million as set out in the following table.   

($millions)  
Segment 

Lumber 
Panels 
Pulp & Paper 
Corporate 
Total 

Profit 
Improvement 

Maintenance of 
Business 

184 
1 
18 
- 
203 

63 
21 
40 
9 
133 

Total 

247 
22 
58 
9 
336 

Capital expenditures of $336 million reflect our philosophy of continual reinvestment in our 
mills with significant investments made in both our Canadian and U.S. operations.  In our lumber 
operations we invested in several continuous kilns and a number of projects to improve grade, 
recovery and output.  The two largest projects are a sawmill rebuild at our Opelika, Alabama 
operation which is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2018 and a sawmill upgrade 
at our High Prairie, Alberta operation which is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 
2018. 

Maintenance of business expenditures are primarily for safety upgrades, roads, bridges, mobile 
equipment and major maintenance shutdowns. 

Business Outlook 

Operations 

We expect continuing improved productivity from our lumber segment resulting in an increase in 
overall lumber production of approximately 700 MMfbm compared to 2017.  The increase 
reflects the acquisition of the six Gilman sawmills in the U.S. South on August 31, 2017, the 
impact of several major capital projects completed in 2017 and recovery of production lost due 
to curtailments during the 2017 wildfires in British Columbia.  Anticipated production gains 
assume improving demand and normal access to logs and transportation resources.  Results could 
be adversely affected by delays in accessing salvage timber from the fire affected regions, 
abnormal weather conditions in any of our operating areas and increased competition for logs in 
the B.C. interior.  We expect continuing log cost escalation in the B.C. interior as mountain pine 
beetle-killed timber reaches the end of commercial viability and the loss of timber from fires in 
2017 both negatively affect overall log supply.  We expect log cost inflation in the U.S. South to 
be limited. 

In our panels segment our plywood operations are not expected to repeat the record performance 
of 2017 as plywood prices revert to more traditional levels.  Operations were restored at our 
WestPine MDF plant part way through 2017.  Two of our plywood operations are in the B.C. 
interior, and we expect log costs for those operations to continue to increase in 2018. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
- 50 - 

Both of our NBSK mills undertook major maintenance shutdowns in 2017 (our jointly-owned 
Cariboo mill in the second quarter and Hinton in the third quarter) and will not have a similar 
shutdown interruption in 2018.  Improved productivity at these mills continues to be a key focus 
for us.  Our BCTMP mills and our jointly-owned newsprint mill continued to operate well in 
2017 and we expect generally similar operations in 2018, assuming adequate markets. 

Markets 

Our lumber segment’s most important market is the U.S. and particularly residential construction 
and repair and remodelling.  In 2017, CVD and ADD were imposed on Canadian producers and 
we were required to make deposits in respect of these duties.  Whether and to what extent duties 
can be passed along to consumers will largely depend on the strength of demand for softwood 
lumber, which is significantly influenced by the levels of new residential construction in the U.S. 
which has been gradually improving over the past several years.  If duties can be passed through 
to consumers in whole or in part the price of Canadian softwood lumber will increase (although 
the increase will not necessarily be for the benefit of Canadian producers) which in turn could 
cause the price of SYP lumber, which would not be subject to the duty, to increase as well. 

We are anticipating continued improvement in U.S. new residential construction and steady 
demand from China and Japan for Canadian softwood lumber, but it is currently very difficult to 
predict how and to what extent duties will affect lumber prices and the cost structure of our 
Canadian lumber business over the long term. 

The major component of our panels segment is plywood which is sold mainly in Canada.  
Although demand for Canadian plywood has been strong over the past several years, we 
anticipate some downward pressure on plywood prices in 2018 as measures implemented by 
various governments across Canada have taken steps to attempt to moderate housing markets.  
MDF and LVL demand is heavily influenced by North American new home construction and we 
are expecting continuing improvement in U.S. residential construction which should help 
maintain price levels for these products. 

We are anticipating that pulp markets will generally be flat to slightly weaker as the market 
adjusts to new production coming on line.  Pulp demand will be heavily influenced by the pace 
of Chinese economic activity. 

Cash flows 

We are anticipating levels of cash flows, taking into account duties on Canadian softwood 
lumber exports to the U.S., to support between $300 and $350 million of capital spending in 
2018 as well as to continue to support dividend payments.  We have paid a dividend in every 
quarter since we became a public company in 1986.  We expect to maintain our investment grade 
rating and intend to preserve sufficient liquidity to be able to take advantage of strategic growth 
opportunities that may arise.  We are authorized under our normal course issuer bid, which 
expires in September of 2018, to purchase up to 5% of our outstanding Common shares and we 
will continue to consider share purchases with excess cash if we are satisfied that this will 
enhance shareholder value. 

Change in pre-tax earnings1 
78 
8 
6 
8 
33 

Estimated Earnings Sensitivity to Key Variables 

- 51 - 

Variation 

(based on 2017 production - $millions) 
Factor 
Lumber price 
Plywood price 
NBSK price 
BCTMP price 
U.S. – Canadian $ exchange rate2 
1. 
2. 
US$0.01 change; additional changes are substantially, but not exactly, linear. 

US$10 (per Mfbm) 
Cdn$10 (per Msf) 
US$10 (per tonne) 
US$10 (per tonne) 
US$0.01 (per Cdn $) 

Each sensitivity has been calculated on the basis that all other variables remain constant and assumes year end foreign exchange rates. 
Excludes exchange impact of translation of U.S. dollar-denominated debt and other monetary items.  Reflects the amount of the initial 

Capital Structure and Liquidity 

The capital structure of the Company consists of Common share equity and long-term debt.  In 
addition, the Company maintains a committed revolving credit facility and lines of credit 
dedicated to letters of credit. 

In September 2017 we announced approval for renewal of our normal course issuer bid expiring 
that month.  The renewal allows us to acquire up to 3,794,375 Common shares for cancellation 
until expiry of the bid on September 18, 2018.  From September 19, 2017 to February 14, 2018, 
under this bid, we repurchased 149,084 Common shares for cancellation at an average price of 
$73.27.  In 2017 we repurchased a total of 245,645 Common shares for cancellation at an 
average price of $68.45 (2016 – 4,306,159 Common shares at an average price of $44.06). 

Our outstanding Common share equity consists of 75,601,226 Common shares and 2,281,478 
Class B Common shares for a total of 77,882,704 shares issued and outstanding as at 
February 14, 2018. 

Our Class B Common shares are equal in all respects to our Common shares and are 
exchangeable on a one-for-one basis for Common shares.  Our Common shares are listed for 
trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange while our Class B Common shares are not.  Certain 
circumstances or corporate transactions may require the approval of the holders of our Common 
shares and Class B Common shares on a separate class by class basis. 

As of February 14, 2018 there were 1,435,938 share purchase options outstanding with exercise 
prices ranging from $12.36 to $73.99 per Common share. 

In October 2014, we issued US$300 million of fixed-rate senior unsecured notes, bearing interest 
at 4.35% and due October 2024, pursuant to a private placement in the U.S.  The notes are 
redeemable, in whole or in part, at our option at any time.   

On August 28, 2017 we were advanced a US$200 million 5 year term loan that matures on 
August 25, 2022 to fund the Gilman Acquisition.  Interest is payable at floating rates based on 
Base Rate Advances or LIBOR Advances at our option.  This loan is repayable at any time, in 
whole or in part, at our option and without penalty but cannot be redrawn after payment. 

- 52 - 

On August 28, 2017 we extended the maturity date of our $500 million committed operating 
revolving credit facility to August 25, 2022.  Our operating facilities include a $500 million 
committed revolving credit facility, a $31 million (US$25 million) demand line of credit 
dedicated to our U.S. operations and an $8 million demand line of credit dedicated to our jointly-
owned newsprint operation.  In addition, we have demand lines of credit totalling $59 million 
dedicated to letters of credit of which US$7 million is committed to our U.S. operations.  These 
facilities are available to meet our funding requirements. 

All debt is unsecured except the $8 million joint newsprint operation demand line of credit, 
which is secured by that joint operation’s current assets. 

At December 31, 2017 there were no amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility.  
Letters of credit in the amount of $47 million were supported by our facilities, leaving 
approximately $551 million of credit available for further use. 

Our cash requirements, other than for operating purposes, are primarily for interest payments, 
repayment of debt, additions to property, plant, equipment and timber, acquisitions and payment 
of dividends.  In normal business cycles and in years without a major acquisition or debt 
repayment, cash on hand and cash provided by operations have normally been sufficient to meet 
these requirements. 

Summary of Financial Position 
($millions, except as otherwise indicated) 
As at December 31 
Cash1 
Current assets 
Current liabilities 
Ratio of current assets to current liabilities 
Net debt2 
Shareholders’ equity 
Net debt to total capital3 
1.  Cash consists of cash and short-term investments. 
2. 
3.  Non-IFRS measure.  See “Non-IFRS Measures” below. 

Total debt less deferred financing costs less cash plus cheques issued in excess of funds on deposit. 

2017 
258 
1,291 
583 
2.2 
376 
2,726 
12% 

2016 
50 
938 
459 
2.0 
376 
2,241 
14% 

As shown in the table below, we are rated by three rating agencies.  All three agencies 
maintained our investment grade ratings with a Stable Outlook. 

Debt Ratings 
Agency 
DBRS 
Moody’s 
Standard & Poor’s 

Rating 
BBB(low) 
Baa3 
BBB- 

Outlook 
Stable 
Stable 
Stable 

These ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to 
revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies. 

- 53 - 

Selected Cash Flow Items 
($millions) 
For the year ended December 31 
Operating Activities 
Earnings  
Amortization 
Foreign exchange gain on long-term financing 
Change in income taxes 
Changes in non-cash working capital 
Other 
Cash provided by operating activities 
Financing Activities 
Proceeds from long-term debt 
Repayment of operating loan 
Finance expense paid 
Dividends  
Common share repurchases 
Other 
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities 
Investing Activities 
Acquisition 
Additions to capital assets 
Other 
Cash used in investing activities 

Increase in cash 

Operating Activities 

2017 

2016 

596 
210 
(10) 
177 
(62) 
(9) 
902 

250 
- 
(23) 
(28) 
(17) 
(1) 
181 

(526) 
(336) 
8 
(854) 

229 

326 
197 
(4) 
111 
90 
(31) 
689 

- 
(181) 
(23) 
(22) 
(190) 
2 
(414) 

- 
(273) 
10 
(263) 

12 

Cash provided by operating activities in 2017 was $902 million compared to $689 million in 
2017.  The table above shows the main components of cash generation for the year compared to 
2016.  Increased earnings combined with increased income taxes payable, partially offset by 
higher working capital balances were the significant factors affecting comparison between years.  
The cash generated from income taxes relates to current tax expense being higher than instalment 
payments in 2017, the 2017 payment of the 2016 income tax balance due and the impact of the 
change in deferred income tax balances.  The main components of the working capital change 
relates to increased inventories and receivables. 

Financing Activities 

During the year we borrowed $250 million to partially finance the Gilman Acquisition.  The 
significant uses of cash in 2016 were to repay operating loans and fund Common share 
repurchases. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 54 - 

Investing Activities 

The cash used for investing activities in 2017 was related to the Gilman Acquisition for $526 
million and additions to capital assets of $336 million.  The main use of cash in 2016 was for 
capital asset additions of $273 million. 

Contractual Obligations1 
($millions, as at December 31, 2017) 

2019 
Long-term debt2 
- 
3 
Operating leases 
- 
Asset purchase commitments 
3 
Total 
1.  Contractual obligations means an agreement related to debt, leases and enforceable agreements to purchase goods or services on specified 
terms, but does not include reforestation and decommissioning obligations, energy purchases under various agreements, pension contributions 
payable, accounts payable in the ordinary course of business or contingent amounts payable. 
2. 

2021  Thereafter 
631 
3 
- 
634 

Total 
641 
16 
53 
710 

2020 
10 
3 
- 
13 

2018 
- 
4 
53 
57 

Includes U.S. dollar-denominated debt of US$500 million. 

- 
3 
- 
3 

Significant Management Judgments Affecting Financial Results 

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and 
assumptions, and to select accounting policies, that affect the amounts reported.  The significant 
accounting policies followed by our Company are disclosed in our Financial Statements.  The 
following judgments are considered the most significant: 

Softwood Lumber Dispute 

The current softwood lumber dispute is the fifth such dispute since 1982.  In the case of previous 
disputes, the preliminary duties were subsequently reduced in the periods following the initial 
application. 

On April 24, 2017, the USDOC issued its preliminary determination in the CVD investigation 
and imposed a Company specific rate of 24.12% to be posted by cash deposits on the exports 
from Canada of softwood lumber to the U.S. on or after April 28, 2017.  The requirement that we 
deposit CVD was suspended on August 24, 2017.  On December 4, 2017, the USDOC amended 
our CVD rate to 17.99% and effective December 28, 2017 we began posting cash deposits at the 
new rate.  In the absence of additional information, we have expensed CVD deposits at the 
17.99% final rate.  The difference between deposits paid at 24.12% and the 17.99% final rate has 
been recorded as a long-term asset. 

On June 26, 2017, the USDOC issued its preliminary determination in the ADD investigation 
and imposed a company specific rate of 6.76% to be posted by cash deposits on the exports from 
Canada of softwood lumber to the U.S. on or after June 30, 2017.  On December 4, 2017 the 
USDOC amended our ADD rate to 5.57% and we began posting cash deposits at the new rate.  
The ADD rate determined by the USDOC was based on their preliminary investigation covering 
the period October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016.  This preliminary rate is expected to remain 
in place until our actual data is reviewed by the USDOC.  The initial review by the USDOC, 
covering the period June 30, 2017 to November 30, 2018, is expected to be completed between 
January 2019 and June 2020.  We have prepared an estimate of our ADD rate for 2017 using our 

 
- 55 - 

actual data and the methodology expected to be used by the USDOC and determined our best 
estimate of our rate to be 0.9%.  In the absence of additional information, we have expensed 
ADD deposits at our estimated 0.9% rate.  The difference between deposits paid and the 0.9% 
rate have been recorded as a long-term asset. 

The duty rates are subject to change based on administrative reviews and appeals available to us.  
In addition we will update our ADD rate at each reporting date considering our actual results for 
each period of review.  Changes to estimated rates may be material and any changes will be 
reflected through current results in the period of the change. 

Recoverability of Long-lived Assets 

We assess the carrying value of an asset when there are indicators of impairment.  The 
assessment compares the estimated discounted future cash flows of the asset to the carrying 
value of the asset.  If the carrying value of the asset exceeds the estimated discounted future cash 
flows relating to the asset, the carrying value is written down to the higher of fair value less costs 
to sell and value-in-use. 

We review the amortization periods for our manufacturing equipment and machinery to ensure 
that the periods appropriately reflect anticipated obsolescence and technological change.  Current 
amortization periods for manufacturing equipment range from 6 to 20 years.  Timber licences are 
amortized over 40 years. 

Goodwill is not amortized.  We compare the carrying value of goodwill and related assets, at 
least once a year, to the estimated discounted cash flows that the assets are expected to generate.  
If it is determined that the carrying value is more than the estimated discounted cash flows, then 
a goodwill impairment will be recorded.  We tested goodwill for impairment in 2017 and 
concluded that its carrying value is not impaired.  The testing of goodwill for impairment 
involves significant estimates including future production and sales volumes, product selling 
prices, foreign currency exchange rates, operating costs, capital expenditures and the appropriate 
discount rate to apply.  In all cases, we have used our best estimates of these projected amounts 
and values.  Given the current global economic uncertainty and the volatility of the markets for 
our products, it is possible that our estimates will be adjusted in the future and that these adjusted 
estimates could result in the future impairment of goodwill. 

We also review the carrying value of deferred income tax assets to ensure that the carrying value 
is appropriate.  The key factors considered are the Company’s history of profitability, future 
expectations of profitability, the expected reversal of temporary differences and the timing of 
expiry of tax loss carry-forwards and limitations on their use. 

Reforestation and Decommissioning Obligations 

In Canada, provincial regulations require timber quota holders to carry out reforestation to ensure 
re-establishment of the forest after harvesting.  Reforested areas must be tended for a period 
sufficient to ensure that they are well-established.  The time needed to meet regulatory 
requirements depends on a variety of factors. 

- 56 - 

In our operating areas, the time to meet reforestation standards usually spans 12 to 15 years from 
the time of harvest.  We record a liability for the estimated cost of the future reforestation 
activities when the harvesting takes place.  This liability is reviewed, at least annually, and 
adjusted to our current estimate of the costs to complete the remainder of the reforestation 
activities.  In 2017 the review of the reforestation obligation resulted in a decrease to the 
obligation of $7 million (2016 – decrease of $10 million). 

We record the estimated fair value of a liability for decommissioning obligations, such as landfill 
closures, in the period when a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made.  We review these 
estimates at least annually, and adjust the obligations as appropriate.  In 2017 the review resulted 
in no change to the obligation (2016 – decrease of $4 million). 

Defined Benefit Pension Plan (“D.B. Plan”) Assumptions 

We maintain several D.B. Plans for many of our employees.  The annual funding requirements 
and pension expenses are based on (i) various assumptions that we determine in consultation 
with our actuaries, (ii) actual investment returns on the pension fund assets, and (iii) changes to 
the employee groups in the pension plans.  Note 13 to the Financial Statements provides the 
sensitivity of a change in key assumptions to our post-retirement obligations. 

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Applied 

The International Accounting Standards Board periodically issues new standards and 
amendments or interpretations to existing standards.  The new pronouncements listed below are 
ones we consider to be most significant. 

IFRS 9 - Financial Instruments 

In November 2009, IFRS 9 was issued and in October 2010 was further amended.  IFRS 9 
addresses classification and measurement of financial assets and replaces the multiple category 
and measurement models in International Accounting Standards (“IAS”) 39 - Financial 
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement for debt instruments with a new mixed measurement 
model having only two categories:  amortized cost and fair value through profit or loss.  IFRS 9 
also replaces the models for measuring equity instruments and such instruments are either 
recognized at fair value through profit or loss or at fair value through other comprehensive 
earnings.  This standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018.  
We do not expect this standard to have a significant effect on our consolidated financial 
statements. 

IFRS 15 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers 

In May 2014, IFRS 15 was issued.  This standard addresses revenue recognition and establishes 
principles for reporting information about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue 
and cash flows arising from an entity’s contracts with customers.  Revenue is recognized when a 
customer obtains control of a good or service and thus has the ability to control its use and obtain 
the benefits from the good or service.  The standard replaces IAS 18 - Revenue, IAS 11 - 
Construction Contracts and the related interpretations.  The standard is effective for annual 

- 57 - 

periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018.  We do not expect this standard to have a 
significant effect on our consolidated financial statements. 

IFRS 16 - Leases 

In January 2016 IFRS 16 was issued.  This standard requires, among other things, lessees to 
recognize leases traditionally recorded as operating leases in the same manner as financing 
leases.  The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019 with 
earlier application permitted.  We do not expect this standard to have a significant effect on our 
consolidated financial statements. 

Non-IFRS Measures 

The following summarizes the non-IFRS measures we use in this MD&A.  None of these 
measures is a generally accepted measure under IFRS and none has a standardized meaning 
prescribed by IFRS.  Investors are cautioned that none of these measures should be considered as 
an alternative to earnings, earnings per share or cash flow, as determined in accordance with 
IFRS.  As there is no standardized method of calculating any of these measures, our method of 
calculating each of them may differ from the methods used by other entities and, accordingly, 
our use of any of these measures may not be directly comparable to similarly titled measures 
used by other entities. 

Adjusted EBITDA 
($millions) 

Earnings 
Add: 

Amortization 
Finance expense 
Tax provision 

EBITDA 
Add: 

Equity-based compensation 
Export duties 
Other  

Adjusted EBITDA 

Q4-17 
207 

Q3-17 
120 

59 
8 
88 
362 

6 
(17) 
(10) 
341 

51 
8 
47 
226 

10 
31 
2 
269 

2017 
596 

210 
31 
250 
1,087 

32 
48 
(7) 
1,160 

Q4-16 
79 

2016 
326 

50 
7 
40 
176 

16 
- 
1 
193 

197 
29 
118 
670 

(5) 
- 
9 
674 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 58 - 

Adjusted EBITDA by Segment 
($millions) 

Q4-17 

Q3-17 

2017 

Q4-16 

2016 

Lumber 

Earnings before tax 
Add: 

Amortization 
Finance expense 

EBITDA 
Add: 

Export duties 
Other  

Adjusted EBITDA 

Panels 

Earnings before tax 
Add: 

Amortization 
Finance expense 

EBITDA 
Add: 

Other  

Adjusted EBITDA 

Pulp & Paper 

Earnings before tax 
Add: 

Amortization 
Finance expense 

EBITDA 
Add: 

Other 

Adjusted EBITDA 
Corporate and Other 

Earnings before tax 
Add: 

Amortization 

EBITDA 
Add: 

Equity-based compensation 
Other 

Adjusted EBITDA 

228 

43 
6 
277 

(17) 
(2) 
258 

20 

4 
- 
24 

- 
24 

53 

12 
2 
67 

(7) 
60 

(6) 

- 
(6) 

6 
(1) 
(1) 

118 

38 
5 
161 

31 
3 
195 

44 

3 
1 
48 

- 
48 

16 

9 
2 
27 

3 
30 

(11) 

1 
(10) 

10 
(4) 
(4) 

660 

155 
20 
835 

48 
1 
884 

97 

13 
3 
113 

- 
113 

126 

40 
8 
174 

(2) 
172 

(37) 

2 
(35) 

32 
(6) 
(9) 

104 

37 
5 
146 

- 
(2) 
144 

19 

3 
- 
22 

(2) 
20 

16 

10 
2 
28 

2 
30 

(20) 

- 
(20) 

16 
3 
(1) 

344 

146 
18 
508 

- 
- 
508 

79 

12 
3 
94 

(5) 
89 

11 

37 
8 
56 

23 
79 

10 

2 
12 

(5) 
(9) 
(2) 

Total Adjusted EBITDA 

341 

269 

1,160 

193 

674 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 59 - 

Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Basic Earnings Per Share 
($millions except EPS amounts which are in $) 
Q4-17 
207 

Q3-17 
120 

Earnings 
Add: 

2017 
596 

Q4-16 
79 

2016 
326 

Export duties 
Equity-based compensation 
Exchange loss (gain) on long-term 

financing 

Loss on power agreements 
Insurance gain on disposal of 

equipment 

Net tax effect on the above 

adjustments 

Re-measurement of deferred income 

tax assets and liabilities 

(17) 
6 

(1) 
- 

(7) 

7 

31 
10 

(5) 
- 

- 

(6) 

48 
32 

(10) 
- 

(7) 

(6) 

- 
16 

4 
8 

(3) 

(3) 

Adjusted earnings 
Adjusted basic EPS1 
1.  Adjusted basic EPS is calculated by dividing Adjusted earnings by the basic weighted average shares outstanding. 

6 
201 
2.58 

- 
150 
1.93 

6 
659 
8.44 

- 
101 
1.28 

- 
(5) 

(4) 
27 

(8) 

(6) 

- 
330 
4.11 

Net Debt to Total Capital Ratio 
($millions except where indicated) 

Net debt 

Cash and short-term investments 
Deferred financing costs1 
Cheques issued in excess of funds on deposit 
Long-term debt 

Shareholders’ equity 
Total capital 
Net debt to total capital 

December 31, 
2017 

December 31, 
2016 

(258) 
(7) 
- 
641 
376 
2,726 
3,102 
12% 

(50) 
(6) 
15 
417 
376 
2,241 
2,617 
14% 

For our balance sheet presentation, these costs are applied to reduce the associated debt or, in instances when the operating loan is undrawn, 

1. 
these costs associated with the operating loan are included in other assets. 

Risks and Uncertainties 

Product Demand and Price Fluctuations 

Our revenues and financial results are primarily dependent on the demand for, and selling prices 
of, our products, which are subject to significant fluctuations.  The demand and prices for 
lumber, panels, pulp, newsprint, wood chips and other wood products are highly volatile and are 
affected by factors such as global economic conditions including the strength of the U.S., 
Canadian and international housing markets, particularly China and Japan, the mix of single and 
multifamily construction, repair, renovation and remodeling spending, alternative uses for 
lumber, changes in industry production capacity, changes in world inventory levels, increased 
competition from other sources of supply of logs and lumber and other factors beyond our 
control.  In addition, unemployment levels, interest rates, the availability of mortgage credit and 
the rate of mortgage foreclosures have a significant effect on residential construction and 
renovation activity, which in turn influences the demand for, and price of, building materials 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 60 - 

such as lumber and panel products.  Declines in demand, and corresponding reductions in prices, 
for our products may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. 

We cannot predict with any reasonable accuracy future market conditions, demand or pricing for 
any of our products due to factors outside our control.  Prolonged or severe weakness in the 
market for any of our principal products would adversely affect our financial condition. 

Availability of Fibre and Changes in Stumpage Fees 

Substantially all of our Canadian log requirements are harvested from lands owned by a 
provincial government (the “Crown”).  Provincial governments control the volumes that can be 
harvested under provincially-granted tenures and otherwise regulate the availability of Crown 
timber for harvest.  Determinations by provincial governments to reduce the volume of timber or 
the areas that may be harvested under timber tenures, including to protect the environment or 
endangered species and critical habitat or as a result of forest fires or in response to jurisprudence 
or government policies respecting aboriginal rights and title, may reduce our ability to secure log 
supply and may increase our log purchase costs. 

In addition, provincial governments prescribe the methodologies that determine the amounts of 
stumpage fees that are charged in respect of harvesting on Crown lands.  Determinations by 
provincial governments to change stumpage fee methodologies or rates could increase our log 
costs. 

We rely on third party independent contractors to harvest timber in areas over which we hold 
timber tenures.  Increases in rates charged by these independent contractors or the limited 
availability of these independent contractors may increase our timber harvesting costs. 

We also rely on the purchase of logs and increased competition for logs, or shortages of logs may 
result in increases in our log purchase costs. 

We rely on log supply agreements in the United States which are subject to log availability and 
based on market prices.  Approximately 17% of the aggregate log requirements for our U.S. 
sawmills may be supplied under long-term agreements with the balance purchased on the open 
market.  Open market purchases come from timber real estate investment trusts, timberland 
investment management organizations and private land owners.  Changes in the log markets in 
which we operate may reduce the supply of logs available to us and may increase the costs of log 
purchases, each of which could adversely affect our results. 

Trade Restrictions 

A substantial portion of our products that are manufactured in Canada are exported for sale.  Our 
financial results are dependent on continued access to the export markets and tariffs and other 
trade barriers that restrict or prevent access represent a continuing risk to us.  Canadian softwood 
lumber exports to the U.S. have been the subject of trade disputes and managed trade 
arrangements for the last several decades.  During the period from October 2006 through 
October 2015 these exports were subject to a trade agreement between the U.S. and Canada and 
on the expiry of that agreement, a one-year moratorium on trade sanctions by the U.S. came into 
place.  That moratorium has expired and in November 2016 a group of U.S. lumber producers 

- 61 - 

petitioned the USDOC and the USITC to impose trade sanctions against Canadian softwood 
lumber exports to the U.S.  In 2017 duties were imposed on Canadian softwood lumber exports 
to the U.S.  The duties are likely to remain in place until and unless some form of trade 
agreement can be reached between the U.S. and Canada or a final, binding determination is made 
as a result of litigation.  Unless the additional costs imposed by duties can be passed along to 
lumber consumers, the duties will increase costs for Canadian producers and, in certain cases, 
could result in some Canadian production becoming unprofitable.  Whether and to what extent 
duties can be passed along to consumers will largely depend on the strength of demand for 
softwood lumber, which is significantly influenced by the levels of new residential construction 
in the U.S. which has been gradually improving over the past several years.  If duties can be 
passed through to consumers in whole or in part the price of Canadian softwood lumber will 
increase (although the increase will not necessarily be for the benefit of Canadian producers) 
which in turn could cause the price of SYP lumber, which would not be subject to the duty, to 
increase as well. 

The application of U.S. trade laws could, in certain circumstances, create significant burdens on 
us.  We are a mandatory respondent in current investigations being conducted by the USDOC 
into alleged subsidies and dumping of Canadian softwood lumber. 

Natural and Man-Made Disasters 

Our operations are subject to adverse natural or man-made events such as forest fires, flooding, 
severe weather conditions, climate change, timber diseases and insect infestations including 
those that may be associated with warmer climate conditions, and earthquake activity.  These 
events could damage or destroy or adversely affect the operations at our physical facilities or our 
timber supply or our access to or availability of timber, and similar events could also affect the 
facilities of our suppliers or customers.  Any such damage or destruction could adversely affect 
our financial results as a result of the reduced availability of timber, decreased production output 
or increased operating costs.  Although we believe we have reasonable insurance arrangements 
in place to cover certain of such incidents related to damage or destruction, there can be no 
assurance that these arrangements will be sufficient to fully protect us against such losses.  As is 
common in the industry, we do not insure loss of standing timber for any cause. 

Mountain Pine Beetle 

The long-term effect of the mountain pine beetle infestation on our Canadian operations is 
uncertain.  The potential effects include a reduction of future Annual Allowable Cut (“AAC”) 
levels to below current and pre-infestation AAC levels.  Many of our British Columbia 
operations are experiencing a diminished grade and volume of lumber recovered from 
beetle-killed logs and increased production costs.  These effects are also present in some of our 
Alberta operations where the mountain pine beetle infestation has expanded.  The timing and 
extent of the future effect on our timber supply, lumber grade and recovery, and production costs 
will depend on a variety of factors and at this time cannot be reasonably determined.  The effects 
of the deterioration of beetle-killed logs could include increased costs, reduced operating rates 
due to shortages of commercially merchantable timber and mill closures. 

Wood Dust 

- 62 - 

Our operations generate wood dust which has been recognized for many years as a potential 
health and safety hazard.  The potential risks associated with wood dust have been increased in 
those of our British Columbia and Alberta facilities that have been processing mountain pine 
beetle-killed logs as the wood dust generated from these logs tends to be drier, lighter and finer 
than wood dust typically generated.  We have adopted a variety of measures to reduce or 
eliminate the risks posed by the presence of wood dust in our facilities and we continue to work 
with industry and regulators to develop and adopt best mitigation practices.  Any explosion or 
similar event at any of our facilities or any third-party facility could result in significant loss, 
increases in expenses and disruption of operations, each of which would have a material adverse 
effect on our business. 

Financial 

Our capital plans will include, from time to time, expansion, productivity improvement, 
technology upgrades, operating efficiency optimization and repair or replacement of our existing 
facilities and equipment.  In addition, we may undertake the acquisition of facilities or the 
rebuilding or modernization of existing facilities.  If the capital expenditures associated with 
these capital projects are greater than we have projected or if construction timelines are longer 
than anticipated, or if we fail to achieve the intended efficiencies, our financial condition, results 
of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected.  In addition, our ability to expand 
production and improve operational efficiencies will be contingent on our ability to execute on 
our capital plans.  Our capital plans may be adversely affected by availability of, and competition 
for, qualified workers and contractors, equipment lead times, changes in government regulations, 
unexpected delays and increases in costs of completing capital projects. 

We believe our capital resources will be adequate to meet our current projected operating needs, 
capital expenditures and other cash requirements.  Factors that could adversely affect our capital 
resources include prolonged and sustained declines in the demand and prices for our products, 
unanticipated significant increases in our operating expenses and unanticipated capital 
expenditures.  If for any reason we are unable to provide for our operating needs, capital 
expenditures and other cash requirements on commercially reasonable terms, we could 
experience a material adverse effect to our business, financial condition, results of operations and 
cash flows. 

We rely on long-term borrowings and access to revolving credit in order to finance our ongoing 
operations.  Any change in availability of credit in the market, as could happen during an 
economic downturn, could affect our ability to access credit markets on commercially reasonable 
terms.  In the future we may need to access public or private debt markets to issue new debt.  
Deteriorations or volatility in the credit markets could also adversely affect: 

•  our ability to secure financing to proceed with capital expenditures for the repair, 

replacement or expansion of our existing facilities and equipment; 

•  our ability to comply with covenants under our existing credit or debt agreements; 
• 
•  our ability to take advantage of growth, expansion or acquisition opportunities. 

the ability of our customers to purchase our products; and 

- 63 - 

In addition, deteriorations or volatility in the credit market could result in increases in the interest 
rates that we pay on our outstanding non-fixed rate debt, which would increase our costs of 
borrowing and adversely affect our results. 

Credit rating agencies rate our debt securities based on factors that include our operating results, 
actions that we take, their view of the general outlook for our industry and their view of the 
general outlook for the economy.  Actions taken by the rating agencies can include maintaining, 
upgrading or downgrading the current rating or placing us on a watch list for possible future 
downgrading.  Downgrading the credit rating of our debt securities or placing us on a watch list 
for possible future downgrading could limit our access to the credit markets, increase our cost of 
financing and have an adverse effect on our financial condition. 

We rely heavily on certain raw materials, including logs, wood chips and chemicals, and energy 
sources, including natural gas and electricity, in our manufacturing processes.  Increases in the 
costs of these raw materials and energy sources will increase our operating costs and will reduce 
our operating margins.  There is no assurance that we will be able to fully offset the effects of 
higher raw material or energy costs through hedging arrangements, price increases, productivity 
improvements or cost-reduction programs. 

Operational Curtailments 

From time to time, we suspend or curtail operations at one or more of our facilities in response to 
market conditions, environmental risks, or other operational issues, including, but not limited to 
scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, temporary periods of high electricity prices, power 
failures, equipment breakdowns, adverse weather conditions, labour disruptions and fire hazards. 

In addition, our ability to operate at full capacity may be affected by ongoing capital projects.  
As a result, our facilities may from time to time operate at less than full capacity.  These 
operational suspensions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition as a 
result of decreased revenues and lower operating margins. 

In Canada, a substantial portion of the wood chip requirements of our Canadian pulp and paper 
operations are provided by our Canadian sawmills and plywood and LVL plants.  If wood chip 
production is reduced because of production curtailments, improved manufacturing efficiencies 
or any other reason, our pulp and paper operations may incur additional costs to acquire or 
produce additional wood chips or be forced to reduce production.  Conversely, pulp and paper 
mill production curtailments may require our sawmills and panel mills to find other ways to 
dispose of residual wood fibre and may result in curtailment or suspension of lumber, plywood 
or LVL production and increased costs. 

Transportation Requirements 

Our business depends on our ability to transport a high volume of products to our production 
facilities and on to both domestic and international markets.  We rely primarily on third-party 
transportation providers for both the delivery of raw materials to our production facilities and the 
transportation of our products to market.  These third-party transportation providers include 
truckers, bulk and container shippers and railways.  Our ability to obtain transportation services 
from these transportation service providers is subject to risks which include, without limitation, 

- 64 - 

availability of equipment and operators, disruptions due to weather, natural disasters and labour 
disputes.  Transportation costs are also subject to risks that include, without limitation, increased 
rates due to competition and increased fuel costs.  Increases in transportation costs will increase 
our operating costs.  If we are unable to obtain transportation services or if our transportation 
costs increase, our revenues may decrease due to our inability to deliver products to market and 
our operating expenses may increase, each of which would adversely affect our results of 
operations. 

Labour and Services 

Our operations rely on both skilled and unskilled workers as well as third party services such as 
logging and transportation.  Because our operations are generally located away from major urban 
centres, we often face strong competition from our industry and others such as oil and gas 
production and mining for labour and services, particularly skilled trades.  Shortages of key 
services or shortages of labour, including those caused by a failure to attract and retain a 
sufficient number of qualified employees and other personnel or high employee turnover could 
impair our operations by reducing production or increasing costs. 

We employ a unionized workforce in a number of our operations.  Walkouts or strikes by 
employees could result in lost production and sales, higher costs and supply constraints that 
could have a material adverse effect on our business.  Also, we depend on a variety of third 
parties that employ unionized workers to provide critical services to us.  Labour disputes 
experienced by these third parties could lead to disruptions at our facilities. 

Environment 

We are subject to regulation by federal, provincial, state, municipal and local environmental 
authorities, including, among other matters, environmental regulations relating to air emissions 
and pollutants, wastewater (effluent) discharges, solid and hazardous waste, landfill operations, 
forestry practices, permitting obligations, site remediation and the protection of threatened or 
endangered species and critical habitat.  We have incurred, and will continue to incur, capital 
expenditures and operating costs to comply with environmental laws and regulations, including 
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Boiler MACT (maximum achievable control 
technology) regulations.  No assurance can be given that changes in these laws and regulations or 
their application will not have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial 
condition and operational results.  Similarly, no assurance can be given that capital expenditures 
necessary for future compliance with existing and new environmental laws and regulations could 
be financed from our available cash flow.  We may discover currently unknown environmental 
problems, contamination, or conditions relating to our past or present operations.  This or any 
failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations may require site or other remediation 
costs or result in governmental or private claims for damage to person, property, natural 
resources or the environment or governmental sanctions, including fines or the curtailment or 
suspension of our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, 
financial condition and operational results. 

We are currently involved in investigation and remediation activities and maintain accruals for 
certain environmental matters or obligations, as set out in the notes to our Financial Statements 

- 65 - 

for the year ended December 31, 2017.  There can be no assurance that any costs associated with 
such obligations or other environmental matters will not exceed our accruals. 

Our Canadian woodland operations, and the harvesting operations of our many key U.S. 
suppliers, in addition to being subject to various environmental protection laws, are subject to 
third-party certification as to compliance with internationally recognized, sustainable forest 
management standards.  Demand for our products may be reduced if we are unable to achieve 
compliance, or are perceived by the public as failing to comply, with these applicable 
environmental protection laws and sustainable forest management standards, or if our customers 
require compliance with alternate forest management standards for which our operations are not 
certified.  In addition, changes in sustainable forest management standards or our determination 
to seek certification for compliance with alternate sustainable forest management standards may 
increase our costs of operations. 

Aboriginal Groups 

Issues relating to aboriginal groups, including First Nations, Metis and others, have the potential 
for a significant adverse effect on resource companies operating in Canada including West 
Fraser.  Risks include potential delays or effects of governmental decisions relating to Canadian 
Crown timber harvesting rights (including their grant, renewal or transfer or authorization to 
harvest) in light of the government’s duty to consult and accommodate aboriginal groups in 
respect of aboriginal rights or treaty rights, related terms and conditions of authorizations and 
potential findings of aboriginal title over land.  The requirement to consult with aboriginal 
groups has also increased in recent years. 

We participate, as requested by government, in the consultation process in support of the 
government fulfilling its duty to consult.  We also seek to develop and maintain good 
relationships with aboriginal groups that may be affected by our business activities.  However, as 
the jurisprudence and government policies respecting aboriginal rights and title and the 
consultation process continue to evolve, and as treaty negotiations continue, we cannot assure 
that aboriginal claims will not in the future have a material adverse effect on our timber 
harvesting rights or our ability to exercise or renew them or secure other timber harvesting rights. 

In addition, the Canadian federal government and the provincial governments in Alberta and 
British Columbia have made commitments to renew their relationships with aboriginal groups 
and have expressed their support for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous 
Peoples (“UNDRIP”) and their intent to adopt and implement UNDRIP.  At this time, it is 
unclear whether or how UNDRIP will be adopted into Canadian law and its impact on the 
Crown’s duty to consult with and accommodate aboriginal groups.  At this time, we are unable to 
assess the effect, if any, that the adoption and implementation of UNDRIP by federal and 
provincial governments may have on land claims or consultation requirements or on our 
business, but the impact may be material. 

On June 26, 2014 the Supreme Court of Canada (the “SCC”) released its reasons for judgment in 
Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia.  The SCC declared that the Tsilhqot’in Nation had 
established aboriginal title over an area of British Columbia comprising approximately 1,750 
square kilometres.  The SCC also held that the provisions of the Forest Act (British Columbia) 

- 66 - 

dealing with the disposition or harvest of Crown timber, as presently drafted, no longer applied 
to timber located on those lands, by virtue of the definition of “Crown Timber” in the Forest Act.  
But the SCC also confirmed that provincial laws can apply on aboriginal title lands but only if 
the legislature so intends, and if the government can justify any infringement of aboriginal title 
(according to tests set out in the case law).  It also confirmed that the existing Forest Act 
continues to apply to lands unless and until title is established. 

We do not have any cutting permits in the area that was the subject of the Tsilhqot’in case.  
However, claims of aboriginal title have been asserted by many aboriginal groups throughout 
British Columbia (including lands in which we have interests or rights) and there is a risk that 
other aboriginal groups may pursue further rights or title claims through litigation, or treaty 
negotiations with governments.  It is difficult to predict how quickly other claims will be 
litigated or negotiated and in what manner our Crown timber harvesting rights and log supply 
arrangements will be affected. 

Regulatory 

Our operations are subject to extensive general and industry-specific federal, provincial, state, 
municipal and other local laws and regulations and other requirements, including those 
governing forestry, exports, taxes (including, but not limited to, income, sales and carbon taxes), 
employees, labour standards, occupational health and safety, waste disposal, environmental 
protection and remediation, protection of endangered and protected species and land use and 
expropriation.  We are required to obtain approvals, permits and licences for our operations, 
which may require advance consultation with potentially affected stakeholders including 
aboriginal groups and impose conditions that must be complied with.  If we are unable to obtain, 
maintain, extend or renew, or are delayed in extending or renewing, a material approval, permit 
or licence, our operations or financial condition could be adversely affected.  There is no 
assurance that these laws, regulations or government requirements, or the administrative 
interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and regulations, will not change in the future in a 
manner that may require us to incur significant capital expenditures, pay higher taxes or 
otherwise could adversely affect our operations or financial condition.  Failure to comply with 
applicable laws or regulations, including approvals, permits and licences, could result in fines, 
penalties or enforcement actions, including orders suspending or curtailing our operations or 
requiring corrective measures or remedial actions. 

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates 

We sell the majority of our products at prices denominated in U.S. dollars or based on prevailing 
U.S. dollar prices.  A significant portion of our operational costs and expenses are incurred in 
Canadian dollars.  Therefore, an increase in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. 
dollar reduces the revenue in Canadian dollar terms realized by us from sales made in U.S. 
dollars, which reduces operating margin and the cash flow available to fund operations.  We are 
also exposed to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations in the period between sale and payment.  
We also have a substantial amount of long-term debt repayable in U.S. dollars which is valued in 
Canadian dollars at the end of each reporting period by applying the prevailing exchange rate.  
Exchange rate fluctuations result in exchange gains or losses.  This results in significant earnings 
sensitivity to changes in the Canadian/U.S. dollar exchange rate.  The Canadian/U.S. dollar 

- 67 - 

exchange rate is affected by a broad range of factors which makes future rates difficult to 
accurately predict. 

Competition 

We compete with global producers, some of which may have greater financial resources and 
lower production costs than we do.  Currency devaluations can have the effect of reducing our 
competitors’ costs and making our products less competitive in certain markets.  In addition, 
European lumber producers and South American panel producers may enter the North American 
market during periods of peak prices.  Markets for our products are highly competitive.  Our 
ability to maintain or improve the cost of producing and delivering products to those markets is 
crucial.  Factors such as cost and availability of raw materials, energy and labour, the ability to 
maintain high operating rates and low per-unit manufacturing costs, and the quality of our final 
products and our customer service all affect our earnings.  Some of our products are also 
particularly sensitive to other factors including innovation, quality and service, with varying 
emphasis on these factors depending on the product.  To the extent that one or more of our 
competitors become more successful with respect to any key competitive factor, our ability to 
attract and retain customers could be materially adversely affected.  If we are unable to compete 
effectively, such failure could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition 
and results of operations. 

Our products may compete with non-fibre based alternatives or with alternative products in 
certain market segments.  For example, steel, engineered wood products, plastic, wood/plastic or 
composite materials may be used by builders as alternatives to the products produced by our 
wood products businesses such as lumber, plywood and MDF products.  Changes in prices for 
oil, chemicals and wood-based fibre can change the competitive position of our products relative 
to available alternatives and could increase substitution of those products for our products.  As 
the use of these alternatives grows, demand for our products may further decline. 

Because commodity products have few distinguishing properties from producer to producer, 
competition for these products is based primarily on price, which is determined by supply 
relative to demand and competition from substitute products.  Prices for our products are affected 
by many factors outside of our control, and we have no influence over the timing and extent of 
price changes, which often are volatile.  Accordingly, our revenues may be negatively affected 
by pricing decisions made by our competitors and by decisions of our customers to purchase 
products from our competitors. 

Pension Plan Funding 

We are the sponsor of several defined benefit pension plans which exposes us to market risks 
related to plan assets.  Funding requirements for these plans are based on actuarial assumptions 
concerning expected return on plan assets, future salary increases, life expectancy and interest 
rates.  If any of these assumptions differs from actual outcomes such that a funding deficiency 
occurs or increases, we would be required to increase cash funding contributions which would in 
turn reduce the availability of capital for other purposes.  We are also subject to regulatory 
changes regarding these plans which may increase the funding requirements which would in turn 
reduce the availability of capital for other purposes. 

Information Technology 

- 68 - 

We are reliant on our information and operations technology systems to operate our 
manufacturing facilities, access fibre, communicate internally and with suppliers and customers, 
to sell our products and to process payments and payroll as well as for other corporate purposes 
and financial reporting.  An interruption or failure of our information and operations technology 
systems could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results 
of operations. 

In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual 
property, proprietary business and confidential financial information and identifiable personal 
information of our employees.  We rely on industry accepted security measures and technology 
to protect our information systems and confidential and proprietary information. 

However, our information and operations technology systems, including process control systems, 
are still subject to cyber security risks and are vulnerable to attacks by hackers or others or 
breaches due to employee error or other disruptions.  Any such attack on or breach of our 
systems including through exposure to potential computer viruses or malware could compromise 
our systems and stored information may be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or compromised, 
which could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of 
personal information, regulatory penalties, disruptions to our operations, decreased performance 
and production, increased costs, and damage to our reputation,  which could have a material 
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. 

Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting 

West Fraser’s management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our 
Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, acknowledge responsibility for the design 
and operation of disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial 
reporting, and the requirement to evaluate the effectiveness of these controls on an annual basis. 

Management evaluated the effectiveness of these controls at the end of the reporting period and 
based on this evaluation concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting and the 
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at December 31, 2017. 

No Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting 

There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during the year ended 
December 31, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our 
internal controls over financial reporting. 

Additional information relating to West Fraser, including our Annual Information Form, can be 
found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 

RESPONSIBILITY OF MANAGEMENT 

- 69 - 

The management of West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (“West Fraser”, “we”, “us” or “our”) is 
responsible for the preparation, integrity, objectivity and reliability of the consolidated financial 
statements.  The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards and necessarily include amounts that represent the 
best estimates and judgments of management. 

We maintain a system of internal controls over financial reporting that encompasses policies, 
procedures and controls to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss 
or unauthorized use, transactions are executed and recorded with appropriate authorization and 
financial records are accurate and reliable. 

Our independent auditor, which is appointed by the shareholders upon the recommendation of 
the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors, has completed its audit of the consolidated 
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in Canada and its 
report follows. 

The Board of Directors provides oversight to the financial reporting process through its Audit 
Committee, which is comprised of four Directors, none of whom is an officer or employee of 
West Fraser.  The Audit Committee meets regularly with representatives of management and of 
the auditor to review the consolidated financial statements and matters relating to the audit.  The 
auditor has full and free access to the Audit Committee.  The Audit Committee reports its 
findings to the Board of Directors for consideration in approving the consolidated financial 
statements for issuance to the shareholders. 

Ted Seraphim 
President and 
Chief Executive Officer 

February 14, 2018 

Chris Virostek 
Vice-President, Finance 
and Chief Financial Officer 

 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 70 - 

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 

To the Shareholders of West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of West Fraser Timber Co. 
Ltd., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 
2016 and the consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive earnings, changes in 
shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes, which 
comprise a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. 

Management’s responsibility for the consolidated financial statements 

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated 
financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, and for such 
internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated 
financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. 

Auditor’s responsibility 

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on 
our audits.  We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing 
standards.  Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and 
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial 
statements are free from material misstatement. 

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and 
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.  The procedures selected depend on the 
auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the 
consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.  In making those risk 
assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair 
presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are 
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the 
effectiveness of the entity’s internal control.  An audit also includes evaluating the 
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made 
by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial 
statements. 

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to 
provide a basis for our audit opinion. 

Opinion 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the 
financial position of West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. as at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 
2016 and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards. 

Chartered Professional Accountants 
Vancouver, British Columbia 
February 14, 2018

 
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. 
Consolidated Balance Sheets 
As at December 31, 2017 and 2016 
(in millions of Canadian dollars, except where indicated) 

- 71 - 

Assets 

Current assets 
Cash and short-term investments  
Receivables (note 23) 
Inventories (note 5) 
Prepaid expenses 

Property, plant and equipment (note 6) 
Timber licences (note 7) 
Goodwill and other intangibles (note 8) 
Export duty deposits (note 26) 
Other assets (note 9) 
Deferred income tax assets (note 18)  

Liabilities 

Current liabilities 
Cheques issued in excess of funds on deposit 
Payables and accrued liabilities (note 10) 
Income taxes payable 
Reforestation and decommissioning obligations (note 11) 

Long-term debt (note 12) 
Other liabilities (note 11) 
Deferred income tax liabilities (note 18) 

Shareholders’ Equity 

Share capital (note 14) 
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings 
Retained earnings 

Approved by the Board of Directors 

Janice G. Rennie 
Director 

Robert L. Phillips 
Lead Director 

2017 

2016 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

258 
352 
670 
11 
1,291 
1,892 
533 
731 
37 
27 
6 
4,517 

- 
441 
104 
38 
583 
636 
347 
225 
1,791 

549 
108 
2,069 
2,726 
4,517 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

50 
297 
581 
10 
938 
1,685 
551 
371 
- 
20 
35 
3,600 

15 
379 
21 
44 
459 
413 
272 
215 
1,359 

549 
150 
1,542 
2,241 
3,600 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 72 - 

West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. 
Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings 
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 
(in millions of Canadian dollars, except where indicated) 

Sales  

Costs and expenses 
Cost of products sold 
Freight and other distribution costs 
Export duties (note 26) 
Amortization  
Selling, general and administration  
Equity-based compensation (note 15) 

Operating earnings 
Finance expense (note 16) 
Other (note 17) 
Earnings before tax 
Tax provision (note 18) 
Earnings 

Earnings per share (dollars) (note 20) 
Basic 
Diluted 

Comprehensive earnings 
Earnings 
Other comprehensive earnings 
Translation loss on foreign operations1 
(42) 
Actuarial loss on post-retirement benefits2 
(26) 
Comprehensive earnings 
528 
1.  Recycled through earnings in the event of a disposal in net investment in foreign operations. 
2.  Adjusted through retained earnings.  Net of tax recovery of $7 million (2016 - $3 million). 

596 

$ 

$ 

2017 

2016 

$ 

5,134 

$ 

4,450 

3,124 
653 
48 
210 
197 
32 
4,264 

870 
(31) 
7 
846 
(250) 
596 

7.63 
7.63 

$ 

$ 
$ 

2,971 
629 
- 
197 
176 
(5) 
3,968 

482 
(29) 
(9) 
444 
(118) 
326 

4.06 
3.90 

326 

(14) 
(7) 
305 

$ 

$ 
$ 

$ 

$ 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 73 - 

West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity 
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 
(in millions of Canadian dollars, except where indicated) 

Share capital 

Number 
of shares 

  Amount   

  Translation 
of foreign 
operations 

Retained 
earnings   

Total 
equity 

Balance - December 31, 2015 

82,456,557  $ 

579 

$ 

164 

$  1,404 

$  2,147 

Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for 2016 
Translation loss on foreign 

operations  

Actuarial loss on post-retirement 

benefits  

Issuance of Common shares 
Common share repurchases 
Earnings for the year 
Dividends1 
Balance - December 31, 2016 

- 

- 

(14) 

- 

(14) 

- 
12,170 
(4,306,159) 
- 
- 

78,162,568  $ 

- 
1 
(31) 
- 
- 
549 

$ 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
150 

(7) 
- 
(159) 
326 
(22) 
$  1,542 

(7) 
1 
(190) 
326 
(22) 
$  2,241 

Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for 2017 
Translation loss on foreign 

operations  

Actuarial loss on post-retirement 

- 

- 

(42) 

- 

(42) 

benefits  

- 
Issuance of Common shares 
- 
Common share repurchases 
- 
Earnings for the year 
- 
Dividends1 
- 
108 
Balance - December 31, 2017 
1.  Represents dividends of $0.36 per share for 2017 and $0.28 per share for 2016. 

- 
29,113 
(245,645) 
- 
- 

- 
2 
(2) 
- 
- 
549 

77,946,036  $ 

$ 

(26) 
- 
(15) 
596 
(28) 
$  2,069 

(26) 
2 
(17) 
596 
(28) 
$  2,726 

 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 74 - 

West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 
(in millions of Canadian dollars, except where indicated) 

Cash provided by operations 
Earnings  
Adjustments 

Amortization 
Finance expense 
Foreign exchange gain on long-term financing 
Export duty deposits (note 26) 
Post-retirement expense 
Contributions to post-retirement benefit plans 
Tax provision 
Income taxes paid 
Other 

Changes in non-cash working capital  

Receivables 
Inventories 
Prepaid expenses 
Payables and accrued liabilities 

Cash provided by (used for) financing 
Proceeds from long-term debt 
Repayment of operating loans 
Finance expense paid 
Dividends 
Common share repurchases 
Other 

Cash used for investing 
Acquisition (note 4) 
Additions to capital assets 
Government assistance (note 22) 
Other 

Change in cash  
Foreign exchange effect on cash 
Cash - beginning of year 
Cash - end of year 

Cash consists of  
Cash and short-term investments 
Cheques issued in excess of funds on deposit 

2017 

2016 

$ 

596 

$ 

326 

210 
31 
(10) 
(37) 
82 
(69) 
250 
(73) 
(16) 

(34) 
(64) 
(1) 
37 
902 

250 
- 
(23) 
(28) 
(17) 
(1) 
181 

(526) 
(336) 
3 
5 
(854) 

229 
(6) 
35 
258 

258 
- 
258 

$ 

$ 

$ 

197 
29 
(4) 
- 
71 
(66) 
118 
(7) 
(65) 

4 
50 
7 
29 
689 

- 
(181) 
(23) 
(22) 
(190) 
2 
(414) 

- 
(273) 
8 
2 
(263) 

12 
39 
(16) 
35 

50 
(15) 
35 

$ 

$ 

$ 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 75 - 

West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 
(in millions of Canadian dollars, except where indicated) 

1. 

Nature of operations 

West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (“West Fraser”, “we”, “us” or “our”) is a diversified wood products 
company producing lumber, LVL, MDF, plywood, pulp, newsprint, wood chips and energy with 
facilities in western Canada and the southern United States.  Our executive office is located at 
858 Beatty Street, Suite 501, Vancouver, British Columbia.  West Fraser was formed by articles 
of amalgamation under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) and is registered in 
British Columbia, Canada.  Our Common shares are listed for trading on the Toronto Stock 
Exchange under the symbol WFT. 

2. 

Basis of presentation 

These consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial 
Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and were approved by our Board of Directors on February 14, 
2018. 

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost basis, except 
for certain items as discussed in the applicable accounting policies. 

Accounting policies that relate to the consolidated financial statements as a whole are 
incorporated in this note.  Where an accounting policy is applicable to a specific note disclosure, 
the policy is described within the respective note. 

Accounting policies 

Basis of consolidation 

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of West Fraser and its 
wholly-owned subsidiaries after the elimination of intercompany transactions and balances.  
Principal operating subsidiaries are West Fraser Mills Ltd., West Fraser, Inc., West Fraser Wood 
Products Inc., West Fraser Southeast, Inc., Blue Ridge Lumber Inc., Sundre Forest Products Inc., 
Manning Forest Products Ltd. and West Fraser Newsprint Ltd. 

Our 50% owned joint operations, Alberta Newsprint Company and Cariboo Pulp & Paper 
Company, are accounted for by the proportionate consolidation method. 

Use of estimates and judgments 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and 
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and 
accompanying notes.  It also requires management to exercise judgement in the process of 
applying accounting policies.  Significant areas requiring estimates include recoverability of 
long-lived assets and goodwill, duty deposits related to the softwood lumber dispute, fair value 

- 76 - 

of derivatives, reforestation and decommissioning obligations, employee future benefits, 
equity-based compensation, income taxes and litigation.  Actual amounts could differ materially 
from these and other estimates, the impact of which would be recorded in future periods.  
Management uses judgments and assumptions in assessing potential indicators of impairment, 
determining the appropriate cash generating unit level used in impairment testing and 
determining the accounting treatment for certain investments where we own less than 100% of 
the entity. 

Revenue recognition 

Revenues are derived from product sales and are recognized upon the transfer of significant risks 
and rewards of ownership, provided collectability is reasonably assured. 

Foreign currency translation 

Our functional and presentation currency is Canadian dollars. 

U.S. operations 

Assets and liabilities of our U.S. operations have a functional currency of U.S. dollars and are 
translated at the period-end exchange rate.  Revenues and expenses are translated at average 
exchange rates during the reporting period.  The resulting unrealized translation gains or losses 
are included in other comprehensive earnings. 

Translation of other foreign currency balances and transactions 

Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, including long-term financing, 
are translated at the period-end exchange rate.  Income and expense items are translated at the 
average or transaction date exchange rates during the reporting period.  The resulting translation 
gains or losses are included in other income. 

Cash and short-term investments 

Cash and short-term investments consist of cash on deposit and short-term interest-bearing 
securities maturing within three months of the date of purchase. 

Impairment of long-lived assets 

We review property, plant, equipment, timber licences, goodwill and other intangibles for 
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may 
not be fully recoverable.  Goodwill impairment testing is done at least once a year.  For the 
purpose of impairment testing, assets are separated into cash generating units (“CGUs”).  We 
have identified each of our mills as a CGU for impairment testing of property, plant, equipment 
and other intangibles unless there is economic interdependence of CGUs, in which case they are 
grouped for impairment testing.  Timber licences and goodwill are tested for impairment by 
combining CGUs within the economic area of the related assets. 

- 77 - 

Recoverability is assessed by comparing the carrying amount of the CGU or grouped CGUs to 
the discounted estimated net future cash flows the assets are expected to generate.  If the carrying 
amount exceeds the discounted estimated net future cash flows, the assets are written down to the 
higher of fair value less costs to sell and value-in-use (being the present value of the estimated 
net future cash flows of the relevant asset or CGU). 

Goodwill impairment is assessed by comparing the fair value of its CGU to the underlying 
carrying amount of the CGU’s net assets, including goodwill.  When the carrying amount of the 
CGU exceeds its fair value, the fair value of the CGU’s goodwill is compared with its carrying 
amount.  An impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying value of goodwill over 
its fair value. 

Estimated net future cash flows are based on several assumptions concerning future 
circumstances including selling prices of products, U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rates, 
production rates, input costs and capital requirements.  The estimated net future cash flows are 
discounted at rates reflective of market risk. 

Where an impairment loss for long-lived assets, other than goodwill, subsequently reverses the 
carrying amount of the asset or CGU is increased to the lesser of the revised estimate of its 
recoverable amount and the carrying amount that would have been recorded had no impairment 
loss been previously recognized.  Goodwill impairment is never reversed. 

Fair value measurements 

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an 
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, regardless of whether 
that price is directly observable or estimated using another valuation technique.  For financial 
reporting purposes, fair value measurements are categorized into Level 1, 2 or 3 based on the 
degree to which the inputs to the fair value measurement are observable and the significance of 
the inputs.  Our fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure 
fair value. 

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are: 

Level 1 

Values based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the 
measurement date for identical assets or liabilities. 

Level 2 

Values based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable 
either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. 

Level 3 

Values based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs which are both unobservable 
and significant to the overall fair value measurement. 

- 78 - 

3. 

Accounting standards issued but not yet applied 

IFRS 9 - Financial Instruments 

In November 2009, IFRS 9 was issued and in October 2010 was further amended.  IFRS 9 
addresses classification and measurement of financial assets and replaces the multiple category 
and measurement models in International Accounting Standards (“IAS”) 39 - Financial 
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement for debt instruments with a new mixed measurement 
model having only two categories:  amortized cost and fair value through profit or loss.  IFRS 9 
also replaces the models for measuring equity instruments and such instruments are either 
recognized at fair value through profit or loss or at fair value through other comprehensive 
earnings.  This standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018.  
We do not expect this standard to have a significant effect on our consolidated financial 
statements. 

IFRS 15 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers 

In May 2014, IFRS 15 was issued.  This standard addresses revenue recognition and establishes 
principles for reporting information about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue 
and cash flows arising from an entity’s contracts with customers.  Revenue is recognized when a 
customer obtains control of a good or service and thus has the ability to control its use and obtain 
the benefits from the good or service.  The standard replaces IAS 18 - Revenue, IAS 11 - 
Construction Contracts and the related interpretations.  The standard is effective for annual 
periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018.  We do not expect this standard to have a 
significant effect on our consolidated financial statements. 

IFRS 16 - Leases 

In January 2016, IFRS 16 was issued.  This standard requires, among other things, lessees to 
recognize leases traditionally recorded as operating leases in the same manner as financing 
leases.  The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019 with 
earlier application permitted.  We do not expect this standard to have a significant effect on our 
consolidated financial statements. 

There are no other standards or amendments or interpretations to existing standards issued but 
not yet effective which are expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial 
statements. 

4. 

Acquisition 

On August 31, 2017, we completed the acquisition of six sawmills that produce southern yellow 
pine lumber and a finger-joint mill in Florida and Georgia as well as an administrative office in 
Georgia (the “Gilman Acquisition”).  The consideration paid, net of cash acquired, was $526 
million (US$419 million) and the transaction was an acquisition of shares.  The acquisition was 
financed with cash on hand, borrowings on our revolving credit facility and a $250 million 
(US$200 million) term loan. 

- 79 - 

The transaction has been accounted for as an acquisition of a business.  We have allocated the 
purchase price based on our preliminary estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the 
liabilities assumed as follows: 

Net assets acquired 
Less: cash acquired 
Net non-cash assets acquired 
Allocation: 
Current assets 
Current liabilities 
Property, plant and equipment 
Goodwill 
Employee future benefits 
Deferred income tax asset, net 

Preliminary 
December 31, 2017 
607 
(81) 
526 

58 
(12) 
91 
355 
(11) 
45 
526 

$ 

$ 

Factors contributing to goodwill include the Gilman workforce, assets that are geographically 
complementary to our existing facilities and offer close access to large markets, the available 
timber basket and multiple markets for residuals.  This transaction strengthens our core lumber 
business and gives us increased scale and geographic diversification.  This was a rare 
opportunity to acquire a U.S. lumber producer with meaningful capacity, high quality facilities 
and a culture similar to our own.  The goodwill of $355 million is not deductible for tax 
purposes. 

The deferred income tax asset estimate of $45 million includes an asset of $56 million related to 
the estimated value of net operating losses acquired, partially offset by a liability of $11 million 
related to temporary differences on other assets and liabilities.  On December 21, 2017, the U.S. 
federal government enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“U.S. Tax Reform”), which among other 
things reduced the federal corporate income tax rate.  The result was a $16 million reduction in 
the Gilman deferred tax asset and an increase in our deferred income tax expense in 2017. 

The following table shows the results of the operations of the Gilman Acquisition since the 
acquisition date and the estimated pro-forma West Fraser consolidated results as if we had 
completed the Gilman Acquisition January 1, 2017: 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 80 - 

Gilman  
September 1 to 
December 31, 2017 
131 
15 
(6) 
(16) 
(7) 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

West Fraser  
Pro-forma January 1 to 
December 31, 2017 

5,385 
866 
(255) 
(3) 
608 

Sales 
Earnings before tax 
Income tax 
Impact of U.S. Tax Reform 
Earnings (loss) 

Balances that required significant fair value adjustments for purchase price accounting included 
inventory, property, plant and equipment, goodwill and deferred income tax assets. 

Acquisition costs of $1 million have been expensed in selling, general and administration. 

5. 

Inventories 

Accounting policies 

Inventories of manufactured products, logs and other raw materials are valued at the lower of 
average cost and net realizable value.  Processing materials and supplies are valued at the lower 
of average cost and replacement cost. 

Supporting information 

Manufactured products 
Logs and other raw materials 
Processing materials and supplies 

2017 
358 
167 
145 
670 

$ 

$ 

2016 
283 
165 
133 
581 

$ 

$ 

Inventories at December 31, 2017 were written down by $9 million (December 31, 2016 - $5 
million) to reflect net realizable value being lower than cost. 

The carrying amount of inventory recorded at net realizable value was $33 million at 
December 31, 2017 (December 31, 2016 - $26 million), with the remaining inventory recorded at 
cost. 

6. 

Property, plant and equipment 

Accounting policies 

Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost, less accumulated amortization and 
impairment losses.  Expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized.  Borrowing 
costs are capitalized when the asset construction period exceeds 12 months and the borrowing 
costs are directly attributable to the asset.  Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged 
to earnings.  Upon retirement, disposal or destruction of an asset, the cost and related 
amortization are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in earnings. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 81 - 

Property, plant and equipment are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful 
lives as follows: 

Buildings 
Manufacturing equipment and machinery 
Fixtures, mobile and other equipment 
Roads and bridges 
Major maintenance shutdowns 

10 - 30 years 
6 - 20 years 
3 - 10 years 
Not exceeding 40 years 
12 to 36 months 

Supporting information 

As at December 31, 2015 
Additions 
Amortization1 
Foreign exchange 
Disposals 
Transfers 
As at December 31, 2016 

As at December 31, 2016 
Cost 
Accumulated amortization 
Net 

As at December 31, 2016 
Additions 
Acquisition 
Amortization1 
Foreign exchange 
Disposals 
Transfers  
As at December 31, 2017 

As at December 31, 2017 
Cost 
Accumulated amortization 
Net 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Manufacturing 
plant, 
equipment & 
machinery 
1,479 
111 
(164) 
(14) 
(1) 
33 
1,444 

3,772 
(2,328) 
1,444 

1,444 
164 
85 
(175) 
(35) 
(1) 
128 
1,610 

4,047 
(2,437) 
1,610 

Construction
in progress 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

55 
137 
- 
1 
- 
(33) 
160 

160 
- 
160 

160 
165 
3 
- 
(2) 
- 
(131) 
195 

195 
- 
195 

Roads 
& 
bridges 
38 
14 
(11) 
- 
- 
- 
41 

  Other 
37 
$ 
3 
- 
- 
- 
- 
40 

$ 

128 
(87) 
41 

41 
17 
- 
(14) 
- 
- 
1 
45 

138 
(93) 
45 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

47 
(7) 
40 

40 
1 
3 
- 
(2) 
- 
- 
42 

49 
(7) 
42 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Total 
1,609 
265 
(175) 
(13) 
(1) 
- 
1,685 

4,107 
(2,422) 
1,685 

1,685 
347 
91 
(189) 
(39) 
(1) 
(2) 
1,892 

4,429 
(2,537) 
1,892 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

1.  Amortization of $186 million relates to cost of products sold and $3 million relates to selling, general and 
administration expense (2016 - $173 million and $2 million, respectively). 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 82 - 

7. 

Timber licences 

Accounting policies 

Timber licences, which are renewable or replaceable, are stated at historical cost, less 
accumulated amortization and impairment losses.  Amortization is provided on a straight-line 
basis over their estimated useful lives of 40 years. 

Supporting information 

As at December 31, 2015 
Amortization1 
Acquisitions 
As at December 31, 2016 

As at December 31, 2016 
Cost 
Accumulated amortization 
Net 

As at December 31, 2016 
Amortization1 
Additions 
As at December 31, 2017 

As at December 31, 2017 
Cost 
Accumulated amortization 
Net 

1.  Amortization relates to cost of products sold. 

8. 

Goodwill and other intangibles 

Accounting policies 

Timber 
licences 
570 
(20) 
1 
551 

799 
(248) 
551 

551 
(19) 
1 
533 

800 
(267) 
533 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid for an acquisition over the fair value of 
the net assets acquired.  Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to an annual impairment test.  
An additional impairment test is conducted if events or circumstances indicate that goodwill may 
be impaired. 

Other intangibles are stated at historical cost less accumulated amortization and impairments.  
Other intangibles include software which is amortized over periods of up to ten years and 
non-replaceable finite term timber rights which are amortized as the related timber is logged. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Supporting information 

As at December 31, 2015 
Additions 
Amortization1 
Foreign exchange 
As at December 31, 2016 

As at December 31, 2016 
Cost 
Accumulated amortization 
Net 

As at December 31, 2016 
Additions 
Acquisition 
Transfers 
Amortization1 
Foreign exchange 
As at December 31, 2017 

As at December 31, 2017 
Cost 
Accumulated amortization 
Net 

- 83 - 

  Goodwill 
359 
$ 
- 
- 
(3) 
356 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

356 
- 
356 

356 
- 
355 
- 
- 
(6) 
705 

705 
- 
705 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

  Other 
$ 

Total 
369 
7 
(2) 
(3) 
371 

394 
(23) 
371 

371 
11 
355 
2 
(2) 
(6) 
731 

752 
(21) 
731 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

10 
7 
(2) 
- 
15 

38 
(23) 
15 

15 
11 
- 
2 
(2) 
- 
26 

47 
(21) 
26 

1.  Amortization of $1 million relates to cost of products sold and $1 million relates to selling, general and 
administration expense (2016 - $1 million and $1 million, respectively). 

Goodwill 

We have attributed $218 million of goodwill to a CGU made up of our Canadian lumber 
operations, $441 million of goodwill to a CGU made up of our U.S. lumber operations and $46 
million of goodwill to a CGU made up of our plywood and LVL operations. 

For the purpose of the 2017 impairment test of goodwill, the fair value of CGUs has been 
determined based on value-in-use calculations using a discount rate of 8.5%.  These calculations 
use cash flow projections based on the 2018 operating plan, a forecast of 2019 and 2020 and 
trend level earnings for subsequent years, all approved by management.  Assumptions were 
developed by management based on industry sources, including Forest Economic Advisors, LLC 
and other industry analysts, taking into account management’s best estimates.  No impairment on 
goodwill has been recognized. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 84 - 

9. 

Other assets 

Post-retirement (note 13) 
Deferred financing costs on lines of credit (note 12) 
Other 

10. 

Payables and accrued liabilities 

Trade accounts 
Equity-based compensation 
Compensation 
Export duties 
Dividends 
Interest 
Other  

11.  Other liabilities 

Post-retirement (note 13) 
Reforestation  
Decommissioning  
Other  

2017 
13 
2 
12 
27 

2017 
244 
79 
74 
8 
8 
5 
23 
441 

2017 
231 
70 
25 
21 
347 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

2016 
7 
2 
11 
20 

2016 
211 
65 
68 
- 
5 
4 
26 
379 

2016 
162 
69 
25 
16 
272 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Reforestation and decommissioning obligations 

Reforestation and decommissioning obligations relate to our responsibility for reforestation 
under various timber licences and our obligations related to landfill closures and other site 
remediation costs. 

Accounting policies 

Future reforestation obligations are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to 
be required to settle the obligations and are accrued and charged to earnings when timber is 
harvested.  The reforestation obligation is reviewed periodically and changes to estimates are 
credited or charged to earnings. 

We record the present value of a liability for decommissioning obligations in the period that a 
reasonable estimate can be made.  The present value of the liability is added to the carrying 
amount of the associated asset and amortized over its useful life or, if there is no associated asset, 
it is expensed.  Decommissioning obligations are reviewed annually and changes to estimates 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 85 - 

result in an adjustment of the carrying amount of the associated asset or, where there is no asset, 
they are credited or charged to earnings. 

Reforestation and decommissioning obligations are discounted at the risk-free rate at the balance 
sheet date and accreted over time through periodic charges to earnings.  The liabilities are 
reduced by actual costs of settlement. 

Supporting information 

Beginning of year 
Liabilities recognized 
Liabilities settled 
Change in estimates 
End of year 
Less:  current portion 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Reforestation 
2017 
113 
47 
(45) 
(7) 
108 
(38) 
70 

$ 

2016 
124 
46 
(47) 
(10) 
113 
(44) 
69 

$ 

Decommissioning 
2017 
25 
- 
- 
- 
25 
- 
25 

2016 
29 
- 
- 
(4) 
25 
- 
25 

$ 

$ 

$ 

The total undiscounted amount of the estimated cash flows required to satisfy these obligations is 
$147 million (2016 - $148 million).  The cash flows have been discounted using interest rates 
ranging from 1.68% to 1.86% (2016 - 0.74% to 1.11%). 

The timing of the reforestation payments is based on the estimated period required to attain free 
to grow status in a given area, which is generally between 12 to 15 years.  Payments relating to 
landfill closures and site remediation are expected to occur over periods ranging up to 48 years. 

12. 

Long-term debt and operating loans 

Accounting policies 

Transaction costs related to debt refinancing are deferred and amortized over the life of the 
associated debt.  When our operating loan is undrawn, the related deferred financing costs are 
recorded in other assets. 

Supporting information 

Long-term debt 

US$300 million senior notes due October 2024; interest at 4.35% 
US$200 million term loan due August 2022; floating interest rate 
US$8 million note payable due October 2020; interest at 2% 
Notes payable  

Deferred financing costs 

2017 
376 
251 
10 
4 
641 
(5) 
636 

$ 

$ 

2016 
403 
- 
10 
4 
417 
(4) 
413 

$ 

$ 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 86 - 

On August 28, 2017, we were advanced a $250 million (US$200 million) five-year 
non-revolving term loan due on August 25, 2022.  This loan was used to fund the Gilman 
Acquisition.  Interest is payable at floating rates based on Base Rate Advances or LIBOR 
Advances at our option.  The loan is repayable at any time, in whole or in part, at our option and 
without penalty but cannot be redrawn after payment. 

Required principal repayments are disclosed in note 23. 

Operating loans 

In August 2017, we extended our $500 million committed revolving credit facility to August 25, 
2022.  Our operating loans consist of a $500 million committed revolving credit facility, a $31 
million (US$25 million) demand line of credit dedicated to our U.S. operations and an $8 million 
demand line of credit dedicated to our jointly-owned newsprint operation.  In addition, we have 
demand lines of credit totalling $59 million dedicated to letters of credit, of which US$7 million 
is committed to our U.S. operations. 

At December 31, 2017, there were no amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility.  
As a result, the associated deferred financing costs of $2 million are recorded in other assets.  
Letters of credit in the amount of $47 million were also supported by our facilities, leaving $551 
million of credit available for further use.  At December 31, 2016, our revolving credit facility 
was undrawn, deferred financing costs of $2 million were recorded in other assets and our 
outstanding letters of credit were $48 million. 

Interest on the facilities is payable at floating rates based on Prime, Base Rate Advances, 
Bankers’ Acceptances or LIBOR Advances at our option. 

All debt is unsecured except the $8 million joint operation demand line of credit, which is 
secured by that joint operation’s current assets. 

13. 

Post-retirement benefits 

We maintain defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans covering a majority of our 
employees.  The defined benefit plans generally do not require employee contributions and 
provide a guaranteed level of pension payable for life based either on length of service or on 
earnings and length of service, and in most cases do not increase after commencement of 
retirement. 

The defined benefit pension plans are operated in Canada and the U.S. under broadly similar 
regulatory frameworks.  The majority are funded arrangements where benefit payments are made 
from plan assets which are held in trust.  Responsibility for the governance of the plans, 
including investment and contribution decisions, resides with our Retirement Committees which 
report to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.  For the 
registered defined benefit pension plans, regulations set minimum requirements for contributions 
for benefit accruals and the funding of deficits. 

Accounting policies 

- 87 - 

We record a post-retirement asset or liability for our employee defined benefit pension and other 
retirement benefit plans by netting our plan assets with our plan obligations, on a plan-by-plan 
basis. 

The cost of defined benefit pensions and other retirement benefits earned by employees is 
actuarially determined using the projected unit credit method.  The present value of the defined 
benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outflows using market 
yields from high quality Canadian corporate bonds with cash flows that approximate expected 
benefit payments at the balance sheet date.  Plan assets are valued at fair value at each balance 
sheet date. 

Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial 
assumptions are charged or credited to equity in other comprehensive earnings in the period in 
which they arise. 

Past service costs arising from plan amendments are recognized immediately. 

The finance amount on net post-retirement balances is classified as finance expense. 

For defined contribution plans, pension expense is the amount of contributions we are required to 
make in respect of services rendered by employees. 

Supporting information 

The actual return on plan assets for 2017 is a gain of $123 million (2016 - $112 million). 
The total pension expense for the defined benefit plans is $72 million (2016 - $61 million).  In 
2017, we made contributions of $52 million (2016 - $50 million).  We expect to contribute 
approximately $75 million to our defined benefit pension plans during 2018.  We also provide 
group life insurance, medical and extended health benefits to certain employee groups, for which 
we contributed $3 million (2016 - $3 million). 

The total pension expense and funding contributions for the defined contribution pension plans is 
$14 million (2016 - $13 million). 

In 2017, we settled the defined benefit obligation for two of our pension plans by purchasing 
annuities for the remaining defined benefit members of these plans. The difference between the 
cost of the annuity purchase and the liabilities held for these plans is reflected as a settlement 
cost. 

Subsequent to year-end, we settled approximately $143 million of our defined benefit obligation 
by purchasing annuities using plan assets. 

The status of the defined benefit pension plans and other retirement benefit plans, in aggregate, is 
as follows: 

 
- 88 - 

Defined benefit  
pension plans 
2017 

2016 

Other retirement 
benefit plans 
2017 

2016 

Accrued benefit obligations 
Benefit obligations – opening 
Acquisition (note 4) 
Current service cost 
Finance cost on obligation 
Benefits paid 
Actuarial loss (gain) due to change in 

financial assumptions 

Actuarial loss due to 

demography/experience 

Settlement cost 
Other 
Benefit obligations – ending 

Plan assets 
Fair value – opening 
Acquisition (note 4) 
Finance income on plan assets 
Actuarial gain due to returns on plan 

assets being higher than finance income 

Employer contributions 
Benefits paid 
Settlement cost 
Other 
Fair value – ending 

Funded status1  
Post-retirement assets 
Impact of minimum funding requirement 2 
Post-retirement assets (note 9) 
Post-retirement liabilities (note 11) 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

1,598 
68 
67 
61 
(66) 

$ 

1,482 
- 
57 
60 
(62) 

73 

62 

36 
(10) 
(6) 
1,821 

$ 

2 
- 
(3) 
1,598 

Defined benefit  
pension plans 
2017 

2016 

1,507 
57 
56 

67 
52 
(66) 
(11) 
(4) 
1,658 

$ 

$ 

1,409 
- 
56 

56 
50 
(62) 
- 
(2) 
1,507 

$ 

$ 

$ 

51 
- 
1 
2 
(3) 

(8) 

- 
- 
- 
43 

$ 

$ 

50 
- 
1 
2 
(3) 

- 

1 
- 
- 
51 

Other retirement 
benefit plans 
2017 

2016 

- 
- 
- 

- 
3 
(3) 
- 
- 
- 

$ 

$ 

$ 

- 
- 
- 

- 
3 
(3) 
- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 
(51) 
(51) 

$ 

25 
(12) 
13 
(188) 
(175)  $ 

$ 

20 
(13) 
7 
(111) 
(104)  $ 

- 
- 
- 
(43) 
(43) 

$ 
1.  Plans in a surplus position are classified as assets and plans in a deficit position are shown as liabilities on the 
consolidated balance sheet.  Other retirement benefit plans continue to be unfunded. 
2.  Some of our plans have a surplus that is not recognized on the basis that future economic benefits may not be 
available to us in the form of a reduction in future contributions or a cash refund. 

$ 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 89 - 

Defined benefit  
pension plans 
2017 

2016 

Other retirement 
benefit plans 
2017 

2016 

$ 

$ 

67 
5 
72 

$ 

$ 

57 
4 
61 

$ 

$ 

1 
2 
3 

$ 

$ 

1 
2 
3 

Expense 
Current service cost 
Net finance expense 

Assumptions and sensitivities 

The weighted average duration of the defined benefit pension obligations is 17 years.  The 
projected future benefit payments for the defined benefit pension plans at December 31, 2017 are 
as follows:   

2018 

2019 

2020 to 
2022 

  Thereafter 

Total 

Defined benefit 
pension plans 

$ 

65 

$ 

69 

$ 

227 

$ 

2,984 

$ 

3,345 

The estimation of post-retirement benefit obligations involves a high degree of judgment for 
matters such as discount rate, employee service periods, compensation escalation rates, expected 
retirement ages of employees, mortality rates, expected health-care costs and other variable 
factors.  These estimates are reviewed annually with independent actuaries.  The significant 
actuarial assumptions used to determine our balance sheet date post-retirement assets and 
liabilities and our post-retirement benefit plan expenses are as follows: 

Benefit obligations: 

Discount rate 
Future compensation rate increase 

Benefit expense: 

Discount rate - beginning of year 
Future compensation rate increase 

Defined benefit  
pension plans 

Other retirement 
benefit plans 

2017 

2016 

2017 

2016 

3.50% 
3.50% 

3.75% 
3.50% 

3.75% 
3.50% 

4.00% 
3.50% 

3.50% 
n/a 

3.75% 
n/a 

3.75% 
n/a 

4.00% 
n/a 

Health-care benefit costs, shown under other retirement benefit plans, are funded on a pay-as-
you-go basis.  The actuarial assumptions for extended health-care costs are estimated to increase 
8.5% in year one, grading down 0.5% per year for years two to seven, to 5.0% per year 
thereafter.  The estimated liability for the medical service plan costs was decreased as at 
December 31, 2017 for the B.C. government rate reduction.  It was assumed there would be no 
future rate increases.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 90 - 

The impact of a change in these assumptions on our post-retirement obligations as at 
December 31, 2017 is as follows: 

Discount rate 

Decrease in assumption from 3.50% to 3.00% 
Increase in assumption from 3.50% to 4.00% 

Rate of increase in future compensation 

Decrease in assumption from 3.50% to 3.00% 
Increase in assumption from 3.50% to 4.00% 

Health-care cost trend rates 

Increase in assumption by 1.00% 
Decrease in assumption by 1.00% 

Obligations 

$ 
$ 

$ 
$ 

$ 
$ 

155 
(137) 

(21) 
22 

2 
(4) 

The sensitivities have been calculated on the basis that all other variables remain constant.  When 
calculating the sensitivity of the defined benefit obligation, the same methodology is applied as 
was used to generate the financial statement asset/liability. 

Assets 

The assets of the pension plans are invested predominantly in a diversified range of equities and 
bonds. The weighted average asset allocations of the defined benefit plans at December 31, by 
asset category, are as follows: 

Canadian equities  
Foreign equities 
Fixed income investments 
Other investments 

Target range1 
9% - 25% 
12% - 34% 
36% - 60% 
3% - 31% 

2017 
14% 
27% 
48% 
11% 
100% 

2016 
18% 
25% 
47% 
10% 
100% 

1.  The target range applies to our open plans comprising the majority of our pension assets.  Our closed plans 
target a more conservative asset mix with a greater percentage of fixed income investments. 

Risk management practices 

We are exposed to various risks related to our defined benefit pension and other post-retirement 
benefit plans: 

  Uncertainty in benefit payments:  The value of the liability for post-retirement benefits will 
ultimately depend on the amount of benefits paid and this in turn will depend on the level 
of future compensation increase and how long individuals live. 

  Volatility in asset value:  We are exposed to changes in the market value of pension plan 

investments which are required to fund future benefit payments. 

  Uncertainty in cash funding:    Movement in  the value of the assets  and obligations may 
result in increased levels of cash funding; although changes in the level of cash funding 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 91 - 

required can be spread over a number of years.  We are also exposed to changes in pension 
regulation and legislation. 

The Retirement Committee manages these risks in accordance with a Statement of Investment 
Policies and Procedures for each Pension Plan Master Investment Trust.  The following are some 
specific risk management practices employed: 

  Retaining and monitoring professional advisors including an outsourced chief investment 

officer (“OCIO”); 

  Monitoring our OCIO’s adherence to asset allocation guidelines and permitted categories 

of investments; and 

  Monitoring investment decisions and performance of the OCIO and asset performance 

against benchmarks. 

14. 

Share capital 

Authorized 

400,000,000 Common shares, without par value 
20,000,000 Class B Common shares, without par value 
10,000,000 Preferred shares, issuable in series, without par value 

Issued 

Common 
Class B Common 
Total Common 

2017 

Number 
75,664,558  $ 
2,281,478 
77,946,036  $ 

  Amount 

  Amount 

2016 

Number 
75,881,090  $ 
2,281,478 
78,162,568  $ 

549 
- 
549 

549 
- 
549 

In 2017 we repurchased 245,645 Common shares for $17 million and in 2016 we repurchased 
4,306,159 Common shares for $190 million. 

On September 12, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized the renewal of our normal course 
issuer bid (“NCIB”) program to repurchase for cancellation up to 3,794,375 Common shares or 
approximately 5% of our issued and outstanding Common shares.  The NCIB will expire on 
September 18, 2018.  Our previous NCIB expired on September 18, 2017. 

Rights and restrictions of Common shares 

Common shares and Class B Common shares are equal in all respects except that each Class B 
Common share may at any time be exchanged for one Common share.  Certain circumstances or 
corporate transactions may require the approval of the holders of our Common shares and Class 
B Common shares on a separate class-by-class basis. 

 
 
 
 
 
- 92 - 

15. 

Equity-based compensation 

We have share option, phantom share unit (“PSU”) and directors’ deferred share unit (“DSU”) 
plans. We have partially hedged our exposure under these plans with an equity derivative 
contract.  The equity-based compensation expense included in earnings is $32 million (2016 - 
recovery of $5 million). 

Accounting policies 

We estimate the fair value of outstanding share options using the Black-Scholes valuation model 
and the fair value of our PSU plan and directors’ DSU plan using an intrinsic valuation model at 
each balance sheet date and record the resulting expense or recovery, over the related vesting 
period, through a charge to earnings. 

From time to time, we enter into equity derivative contracts to provide a partial offset to our 
exposure to fluctuations in equity-based compensation from our stock option, PSU and DSU 
plans.  These derivatives are fair valued at each balance sheet date using an intrinsic valuation 
model and the resulting expense or recovery is offset against the related equity-based 
compensation. 

If a share option holder elects to acquire Common shares, both the exercise price and the accrued 
liability are credited to shareholders’ equity. 

Supporting information 

Share option plan 

Under our share option plan, officers and employees may be granted options to purchase up to 
7,295,940 Common shares, of which 587,521 remain available for issuance.  The exercise price 
of a share option is the closing price of a Common share on the trading day immediately 
preceding the grant date.  Our share option plan gives share option holders the right to elect to 
receive a cash payment in lieu of exercising an option to purchase Common shares.  Options vest 
at the earlier of the date of retirement or death and 20% per year from the grant date, and expire 
after 10 years.  We have recorded an expense of $52 million (2016 - recovery of $6 million) 
related to the share option plan. 

- 93 - 

A summary of the activity in the share option plan is presented below: 

2017 

2016 

Outstanding - beginning of year 
Granted 
Exercised 
Expired 
Outstanding - end of year 
Exercisable - end of year 

Number 

Number 

  Weighted 
average 
price 
(dollars) 
29.83 
53.11 
22.77 
55.13 
37.19 
30.68 

2,119,886  $ 
192,255  $ 
(872,973)  $ 
(3,230)  $ 
1,435,938  $ 
978,341  $ 

  Weighted 
average 
price 
(dollars) 
27.03 
40.97 
19.63 
- 
29.83 
24.57 

2,211,951  $ 
246,285  $ 
(338,350)  $ 
-  $ 
2,119,886  $ 
1,643,900  $ 

The following table summarizes information about the share options outstanding and exercisable 
at December 31, 2017:   

Weighted 
average 
remaining 
contractual 
life 
(years) 
1.1 
3.7 
7.4 
7.1 
5.2 

Number of 
outstanding 
options 
(number) 
313,000 
291,706 
702,951 
128,281 
1,435,938 

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price 
(dollars)  
12.47 
24.57 
46.72 
73.99 
37.19 

Number of 
exercisable 
options 
(number) 
313,000 
291,706 
304,151 
69,484 
978,341 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price 
(dollars) 
12.47 
24.57 
45.41 
73.99 
30.68 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

Exercise price range 
(dollars) 
$12.36 - $16.50 
$23.65 - $25.75 
$40.82 - $55.62 
$73.99 

The weighted average share price at the date of exercise for share options exercised during the 
year was $67.80 per share (2016 - $43.13 per share). 

The accrued liability related to the share option plan based on a Black-Scholes valuation model 
is $63 million at December 31, 2017 (December 31, 2016 - $52 million).  The weighted average 
fair value of the options used in the calculation was $43.79 per option at December 31, 2017 
(December 31, 2016 - $23.27 per option). 

The inputs to the option model are as follows: 

Share price on balance sheet date 
Weighted average exercise price 
Expected dividend  
Expected volatility  
Weighted average interest rate 
Weighted average expected remaining life in years 

2017 
$77.33 
$37.19 
$0.44 
33.34% 
1.76% 
3.5 

2016 
$47.95 
$29.83 
$0.28 
33.17% 
0.88% 
2.8 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 94 - 

The expected dividend on our shares was based on the annualized dividend rate at each 
period-end.  Expected volatility was based on five years of historical data.  The interest rate for 
the life of the options was based on the implied yield available on government bonds with an 
equivalent remaining term at each period-end.  Historical data was used to estimate the expected 
life of the options and forfeiture rates. 

The intrinsic value of options issued under the share option plan at December 31, 2017 was $56 
million (December 31, 2016 - $43 million).  The intrinsic value is determined based on the 
difference between the period-end share price and the exercise price, multiplied by the sum of 
the related vested options plus unvested options for those holders eligible to retire. 

Phantom share unit plan 

Our PSU plan is intended to supplement or, in whole or in part, replace the granting of share 
options as long-term incentives for officers and employees.  The plan provides for two types of 
units which vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.  A restricted share unit pays out based 
on the Common share price over the 20 trading days immediately preceding its vesting date (the 
“vesting date value”).  A performance share unit pays out at a value between 0% and 200% of its 
vesting date value contingent upon our performance relative to a peer group of companies over 
the three-year performance period.  Officers and employees granted units under the plan are also 
entitled to additional units to reflect cash dividends paid on Common shares from the applicable 
grant date until payout. 

We have recorded an expense of $6 million (2016 - $3 million) related to the PSU plan.  The 
number of units outstanding as at December 31, 2017 was 109,414 (December 31, 2016 - 
182,770), including performance share units totalling 48,268 (December 31, 2016 - 77,674). 

Directors’ deferred share unit plan 

We have a DSU plan which provides a structure for non-employee directors to accumulate an 
equity-like holding in West Fraser.  The DSU plan allows directors to participate in the growth 
of West Fraser by providing a deferred payment based on the value of a Common share at the 
time of redemption.  Each director receives deferred share units (“Units”) in payment of an 
annual equity retainer until a minimum equity holding is reached and may elect to receive Units 
in payment of up to 100% of other fees earned.  After a minimum equity holding is reached, 
directors may elect to receive the equity retainer in Units or cash.  The Units are issued based on 
our Common share price at the time of issue.  Additional Units are issued to take into account the 
value of dividends paid on Common shares from the date of issue to the date of redemption.  
Units are redeemable only after a director retires, resigns or otherwise leaves the board.  The 
redemption value is equal to the Common share price at the date of redemption.  A holder of 
Units may elect to redeem Units in cash or receive Common shares having an equivalent value. 

We have recorded an expense of $4 million (2016 - nil) related to the DSU plan.  The number of 
Units outstanding as at December 31, 2017 was 102,757 (December 31, 2016 - 155,593). 

Equity-based compensation hedge 

- 95 - 

We have an equity derivative contract to hedge 1,000,000 units at a $46.02 share price.  A 
recovery of $30 million (2016 - $2 million) is included in equity-based compensation related to 
the contract. 

16. 

Finance expense 

Interest expense 
Finance expense on employee future benefits 
Accretion on long-term liabilities 

17.  Other 

2017 
(24) 
(7) 
- 
(31) 

$ 

$ 

2016 
(24) 
(7) 
2 
(29) 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Foreign exchange loss on working capital 
Foreign exchange loss on intercompany financing1 
Foreign exchange gain on long-term debt 
Loss on power agreements 
Insurance gain on disposal of equipment 
Other 

2016 
(4) 
(8) 
12 
(27) 
8 
10 
(9) 
1.  Relates to US$600 million (2016 - US$200 million) of financing provided to our U.S. operations.  An additional 
US$400 million of financing was provided to our U.S. operations at the end of August 2017 to fund the Gilman 
Acquisition.  IAS 21 requires that the exchange gain or loss be recognized through earnings as the financing is not 
considered part of our permanent investment in our U.S. subsidiaries.  The balance sheet amounts and related 
financing expense are eliminated in these consolidated financial statements. 

2017 
(10) 
(15) 
25 
- 
7 
- 
7 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Insurance proceeds 

The insurance gain of $7 million recognized in 2017 and $8 million in 2016 relates to 
involuntary disposals of equipment.  The 2017 gain relates to equipment damaged at our jointly-
owned NBSK plant in Quesnel and the 2016 gain related to the fire at our WestPine MDF 
facility.  Our WestPine MDF mill also has an insurance claim for business interruption.   

The impact on pre-tax earnings is as follows:  

Business interruption insurance proceeds 
Gain on disposal of equipment  

2017 
$ 
- 
 7 
$ 7 

$ 

$ 

2016 
17 
8 
25 

Estimated business interruption insurance is recorded as a reduction of cost of products sold.  
Estimated insurance proceeds for equipment replacement are accounted for as proceeds on 
disposition, and the resulting gain has been included in other income. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The final amount of insurance claims will be adjusted once the claims have been settled. 

- 96 - 

18. 

Tax provision 

Accounting policies 

The tax expense for the period is comprised of current and deferred tax.  Tax is recognized in the 
consolidated statement of earnings, except to the extent that it relates to items recognized in other 
comprehensive earnings in which case it is recognized in other comprehensive earnings. 

Deferred taxes are provided for using the liability method.  Under this method, deferred taxes are 
recognized for temporary differences between the tax and financial statement basis of assets, 
liabilities and certain carry-forward items. 

Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that they will be realized.  
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and 
rates on the date of substantive enactment. 

Supporting information 

The following tables include the impact of the statutory changes for British Columbia and the 
United States.  The major components of income tax included in comprehensive earnings are as 
follows: 

Earnings 
Current tax  
Deferred tax  
Tax provision on earnings 

Other comprehensive earnings 
Deferred tax recovery on post-retirement actuarial losses 

Tax provision on comprehensive earnings 

2017 

(158) 
(92) 
(250) 

7 

(243) 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

2016 

(47) 
(71) 
(118) 

3 

(115) 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

The tax provision differs from the amount that would have resulted from applying the British 
Columbia statutory income tax rate to earnings before tax as follows: 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 97 - 

$ 

Income tax expense at statutory rate of 26% 
Non-taxable amounts 
Rate differentials between jurisdictions and on specified activities 
Unrecognized capital losses 
Impact of statutory tax changes1 
Other 
Tax provision 
1.  Represents the re-measurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the British Columbia tax rate 
change from 11% to 12% and the impact of United States Tax Reform, both of which were substantively enacted as 
at December 31, 2017. 

$ 

$ 

$ 

2017 
(220) 
(6) 
(20) 
1 
(6) 
1 
(250) 

2016 
(115) 
6 
(8) 
1 
- 
(2) 
(118) 

Deferred income taxes are made up of the following components: 

Property, plant, equipment and intangibles 
Reforestation and decommissioning obligations 
Employee future benefits 
Tax loss carry-forwards1 
Other 

Represented by: 
Deferred income tax assets 
Deferred income tax liabilities 

2017 
371 
(30) 
(61) 
(58) 
(3) 
219 

(6) 
225 
219 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

2016 
351 
(30) 
(39) 
(89) 
(13) 
180 

(35) 
215 
180 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Includes federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carry-forwards of $233 million expiring from 2022 to 2031.  A 

1. 
portion of these NOL’s are subject to restrictions on use.  

19. 

Employee compensation 

Our employee compensation expense includes salaries and wages, employee future benefits, 
termination costs and bonuses.  Total compensation expense is $872 million (2016 - $808 
million). 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 98 - 

Key management includes directors and officers for which compensation expense and balance 
sheet date payables are as follows: 

Expense 
Salary and short-term employee benefits 
Post-retirement benefits 
Equity-based compensation1 

Payables and accrued liabilities 
Compensation 
Equity-based compensation1 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 
1.  Amounts do not necessarily represent the actual value which will ultimately be paid. 

20. 

Earnings per share 

2017 

2016 

10 
1 
22 
33 

4 
64 
68 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

9 
2 
(3) 
8 

4 
53 
57 

Basic earnings per share is calculated based on earnings available to Common shareholders, as 
set out below, using the weighted average number of Common shares and Class B Common 
shares outstanding. 

Diluted earnings per share is calculated based on earnings available to Common shareholders 
adjusted to remove the actual share option (recovery) expense charged to earnings and after 
deducting a notional charge for share option expense assuming the use of the equity settled 
method, as set out below.  The diluted weighted average number of shares is calculated using the 
treasury stock method.  When earnings available to Common shareholders for diluted earnings 
per share are greater than earnings available to Common shareholders for basic earnings per 
share, the calculation is anti-dilutive and diluted earnings per share are deemed to be the same as 
basic earnings per share. 

Earnings 
Basic 
Share option expense (recovery) 
Equity settled share option adjustment 
Diluted 

Weighted average number of shares (thousands) 

Basic 
Share options 
Diluted 

Earnings per share (dollars) 

Basic 
Diluted 

2017 

2016 

$ 

$ 

596 
  52 
  (4) 
644 

$ 

$ 

326 
  (6) 
  (4) 
316 

78,097 
858 
78,955 

80,236 
860 
81,096 

$ 
$ 

7.63  $ 
7.63  $ 

4.06 
3.90 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 99 - 

21. 

Commitments 

Operating leases 

We are committed to make payments under certain operating leases for equipment, land, 
building and office space.  Operating lease costs expensed during the year were $6 million (2016 
- $7 million).  The future payments required under operating leases are as follows:  

2018 
2019 
2020 
2021 
Thereafter 

$ 

$ 

4 
3 
3 
3 
3 
16 

Product purchase and sale commitments 

We have long-term purchase and sale contracts with minimum annual volume commitments.  All 
contracts are at market prices and on normal business terms. 

Capital commitments 

Capital commitments at December 31, 2017 are $53 million. 

22.  Government assistance 

Accounting policies 

Government assistance received that relates to the construction of manufacturing assets is 
applied to reduce the cost of those assets.  Government assistance received that relates to 
operational expenses is applied to reduce the amount charged to earnings for the operating item. 

Supporting information 

Government assistance of $3 million (2016 - $8 million) was received for capital projects and 
recorded as a reduction to property, plant and equipment. 

Government assistance of $14 million (2016 - $6 million) was recorded as a reduction to cost of 
products sold.  The government assistance related primarily to bioenergy producer credits, 
research and development and apprentice tax credits. 

23. 

Financial instruments 

Accounting policies 

Our financial assets are categorized as loans and receivables, our financial liabilities as other 
financial liabilities, and our derivatives as held for trading.  All financial assets and liabilities, 
except for derivatives, are initially measured at fair value and subsequently measured at 

 
 
 
 
 
 
- 100 - 

amortized cost using the effective interest rate method.  Derivatives are measured at fair value 
through earnings. 

Supporting information 

The following tables provide the carrying and fair values of our financial instruments by 
category, as well as the associated fair value hierarchy levels as defined in note 2 under “Fair 
value measurements”: 

2017 

Financial assets 
Cash & short-term investments 
Receivables1 
Export duty deposits (note 26) 

Loans & 
receivables 

Held for 
trading 

Level 

Other 
financial 
liabilities 

Carrying 
value 

Fair 
value 

1 
3 
3 

$ 

$ 

258 
351 
37 
646 

$ 

$ 

- 
1 
- 
1 

$ 

$ 

-  $ 
- 
- 
-  $ 

258  $ 
352 
37 
647  $ 

258 
352 
37 
647 

Financial liabilities 
Payables and accrued liabilities 
Long-term debt (note 12)2 

- 
- 
- 
1.  Receivables include our equity derivative receivable of $1 million. 
2.  The fair value of the long-term debt is based on rates available to us at December 31, 2017 for long-term debt 
with similar terms and remaining maturities. 

441 
634 
$  1,082  $  1,082  $  1,075 

441  $ 
641 

441  $ 
641 

- 
- 
- 

2 
2 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

2016 

Financial assets 
Cash & short-term investments 
Receivables 

Financial liabilities 
Cheques issued in excess of 

funds on deposit 

Payables and accrued liabilities1 
Long-term debt (note 12)2 

Loans & 
receivables 

Held for 
trading 

Level 

Other 
financial 
liabilities 

Carrying 
value 

Fair 
value 

1 
3 

1 
2 
2 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

50 
297 
347 

- 
- 
- 
- 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

- 
- 
- 

- 
2 
- 
2 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

-  $ 
- 
-  $ 

50  $ 
297 
347  $ 

50 
297 
347 

15  $ 
377 
417 
809  $ 

15  $ 
379 
417 
811  $ 

15 
379 
391 
785 

1.  Payables and accrued liabilities include our equity derivative payable of $2 million. 
2.  The fair value of the long-term debt is based on rates available to us at December 31, 2016 for long-term debt 
with similar terms and remaining maturities. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial risk management 

- 101 - 

Our activities result in exposure to a variety of financial risks including risks related to derivative 
contracts, currency fluctuation, credit, liquidity and interest rates. 

The sensitivities provided give the effect of possible changes in the relevant prices and rates on 
earnings.  The sensitivities are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of 
future performance or earnings.  Changes in fair values or cash flows based on market variable 
fluctuations cannot be extrapolated since the relationship between the change in the market 
variable and the change in fair value or cash flows may not be linear. 

Derivative contracts 

From time to time, we use derivatives to manage our exposure to U.S. dollar exchange 
fluctuations, commodity prices and equity-based compensation.  Commodity contracts used by 
West Fraser include lumber futures and agreements related to Alberta electricity rates. 

Based on the equity contract as at December 31, 2017 and holding all other variables constant, a 
$1.00 change in our share price would change its fair value by $1 million, which would partially 
offset the movement in our equity-based compensation. 

No energy related derivatives were outstanding at December 31, 2017 or 2016. 

No material lumber futures or foreign exchange contracts were outstanding at December 31, 
2017 or 2016. 

Currency fluctuation 

Most of our products are sold at prices denominated in U.S. dollars or based on prevailing U.S. 
dollar prices, and significant portions of operational costs and expenses are incurred in Canadian 
dollars.  Therefore, an increase in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar 
reduces the revenue in Canadian dollar terms realized by us from sales made in U.S. dollars, 
which reduces operating margin and the cash flow available to fund operations. 

Impact of U.S. dollar currency fluctuation 

The U.S. dollar foreign currency balance sheet exposure at December 31, 2017 is as follows: 

 
- 102 - 

Canadian operations 
Net working capital 
Export duty deposits 
Intercompany financing1 
Long-term debt 

US$ 

US$ 

2017 
163 
29 
600 
(500) 
292 

U.S. operations 
Net investment 
1. 
IAS 21 requires that the exchange gain or loss be recognized through earnings as the financing is not considered 
part of our permanent investment in our U.S. subsidiaries.  The balance sheet amounts and related financing expense 
are eliminated in these consolidated financial statements. 

2017 
1,127 

US$ 

Based on these balances, with other variables unchanged, a $0.01 increase (decrease) in the 
exchange rate for one U.S. dollar into Canadian currency would result in a $4 million decrease 
(increase) in earnings and an increase (decrease) of $18 million in the translation loss on foreign 
operations. 

Credit 

Credit risk arises from the non-performance by counterparties of contractual financial 
obligations.  Investments in cash and short-term investments are primarily made using major 
banks and only made with counterparties meeting certain credit-worthiness criteria.  Credit risk 
for trade and other receivables is managed through established credit monitoring activities.  
Customer credit limits are established and monitored.  Ongoing evaluations of key customer 
financial conditions are performed.  In certain market areas, we have undertaken additional 
measures to reduce credit risk including credit insurance, letters of credit and prepayments.  At 
December 31, 2017, approximately 41% of trade accounts receivable was covered by at least 
some of these additional measures.  We have historically experienced minimal customer defaults 
and, as a result, consider the credit quality of the trade accounts receivable at December 31, 2017 
to be high.  There were no bad debts in 2017 or 2016.  The aging analysis of trade accounts 
receivable is presented below: 

Trade accounts receivable – gross 

Current 
Past due 1 to 30 days 
Past due 31 to 60 days 
Past due over 60 days 

Allowance for doubtful accounts 
Trade accounts receivable – net 
Insurance receivable 
Other  
Receivables 

2017 

2016 

$ 

$ 

290 
3 
2 
1 
296 
- 
296 
20 
36 
352 

$ 

$ 

236 
5 
3 
1 
245 
- 
245 
26 
26 
297 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liquidity 

- 103 - 

We manage liquidity by maintaining adequate cash and short-term investment balances and by 
having appropriate lines of credit available.  In addition, we regularly monitor and review both 
actual and forecasted cash flows.  Refinancing risks are managed by ensuring debt has a 
balanced maturity schedule where possible. 

The following table summarizes the aggregate amount of contractual future cash outflows for 
long-term debt:  

$ 

Long-term debt (note 12) 
Interest on long-debt1,2 

- 
25 
25 
1.  Assumes debt level, foreign exchange rate and interest rates remain at December 31, 2017 levels and rates. 
2.  At December 31, 2017, our revolving credit facility was undrawn. 

631 
52 
683 

- 
25 
25 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

  2019 
$ 

  2021 
$ 

  Thereafter 
$ 

2018 
- 
25 
25 

2020 
10 
25 
 35 

Total 
641 
152 
793 

Interest rates 

Interest rate risk relates mainly to floating rate debt.     

At December 31, 2017, a 100 basis point increase (decrease) in interest rates on floating rate debt 
would result in a $2 million decrease (increase) in earnings.  This analysis assumes that all other 
variables remain constant. 

24. 

Capital disclosures 

Our business is cyclical and is subject to significant changes in cash flow over the business 
cycle.  In addition, financial performance can be materially influenced by changes in product 
prices and the relative values of the Canadian and U.S. dollars.  Our objective in managing 
capital is to ensure adequate liquidity and financial flexibility at all times, particularly at the 
bottom of the business cycle. 

Our main policy relating to capital management is to maintain a strong balance sheet and 
otherwise meet financial tests that are commonly applied by rating agencies for investment grade 
issuers of public debt.  Our debt is currently rated as investment grade by three major rating 
agencies. 

We monitor and assess our financial performance in order to ensure that net debt levels are 
prudent taking into account the anticipated direction of the business cycle.  When financing 
acquisitions, we combine debt and equity financing in a proportion that is intended to maintain 
an investment grade rating for debt throughout the cycle.  Debt repayments are arranged, where 
possible, on a staggered basis that takes into account the uneven nature of anticipated cash flows.  
We have established committed revolving lines of credit that provide liquidity and flexibility 
when capital markets are restricted. 

One key measurement used to monitor our capital position is net debt to total capital, calculated 
as follows at December 31: 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 104 - 

2017 

2016 

(258)  $ 
(7) 
- 
641 
376 
2,726 
3,102 
12% 

(50) 
(6) 
15 
417 
376 
2,241 
2,617 
14% 

Net debt 

Cash and short-term investments 
Deferred financing costs1 
Cheques issued in excess of funds on deposit 
Long-term debt 

$ 

Shareholders’ equity 
Total capital 
Net debt to total capital  
1.  For our balance sheet presentation, these costs are applied to reduce the associated debt or, in instances when 
the operating loan is undrawn, these costs are included in other assets. 

$ 

$ 

25. 

Segment and geographical information 

The segmentation of manufacturing operations into lumber, panels and pulp and paper is based 
on a number of factors, including similarities in products, production processes and economic 
characteristics.  Transactions between segments are at market prices and on normal business 
terms.  The segments follow the accounting policies as described in these consolidated financial 
statement notes, where applicable. 

  Lumber 

  Panels 

Pulp & 
Paper 

Corporate 
& Other 

Total 

2017 
Sales 

To external customers 
To other segments 

$  3,554 
117 
$  3,671 

Operating earnings 

before amortization 

$ 

Amortization 
Operating earnings 
Finance expense 
Other 
Earnings before tax 

$ 

836 
(155) 
681 
(20) 
(1) 
660 

Total assets 
Total liabilities 
Capital expenditures 
Acquisition 

$  3,404 
467 
$ 
247 
$ 
526 
$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

592 
8 
600 

113 
(13) 
100 
(3) 
- 
97 

314 
57 
22 
- 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

988 
- 
988 

172 
(40) 
132 
(8) 
2 
126 

627 
156 
58 
- 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

- 
- 
- 

(41) 
(2) 
(43) 
- 
6 
(37) 

$ 
172 
$  1,111 
9 
$ 
- 
$ 

$ 

5,134 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

1,080 
(210) 
870 
(31) 
7 
846 

4,517 
1,791 
336 
526 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 105 - 

  Lumber 

  Panels 

Pulp & 
Paper 

Corporate 
& Other 

Total 

2016 
Sales  

To external customers 
To other segments 

$  3,042 
103 
$  3,145 

Operating earnings 

before amortization 

$ 

Amortization 
Operating earnings 
Finance expense 
Other  
Earnings before tax 

$ 

508 
(146) 
362 
(18) 
- 
344 

Total assets 
Total liabilities 
Capital expenditures  

$  2,662 
393 
$ 
195 
$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 

521 
8 
529 

89 
(12) 
77 
(3) 
5 
79 

286 
53 
25 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 

887 
- 
887 

79 
(37) 
42 
(8) 
(23) 
11 

583 
110 
42 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 

- 
- 
- 

3 
(2) 
1 
- 
9 
10 

69 
803 
11 

$ 

4,450 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 

679 
(197) 
482 
(29) 
(9) 
444 

3,600 
1,359 
273 

The geographic distribution of non-current assets and external sales is as follows: 

Canada 
United States 
China 
Other Asia 
Other 

Non-current assets  
2016 
2017 
$ 1,987 
$ 2,096 
 675 
 1,130 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
$ 2,662 
$ 3,226 

Sales by geographic area1 

2017 
$ 1,129 
 2,973 
  627 
  357 
  48 
$ 5,134 

2016 
$ 994 
 2,583 
 486 
 317 
  70 
$ 4,450 

1.  Sales distribution is based on the location of product delivery. 

26. 

Softwood lumber dispute 

On November 25, 2016 a coalition of U.S. lumber producers petitioned the U.S. Department of 
Commerce (“USDOC”) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) to investigate 
alleged subsidies to Canadian softwood lumber producers and levy countervailing and 
antidumping duties against Canadian softwood lumber imports.  We were chosen by the USDOC 
as a “mandatory respondent” to both the countervailing and antidumping investigations and as a 
result have received unique company specific rates. 

On April 24, 2017, the USDOC issued its preliminary determination in the countervailing duty 
(“CVD”) investigation and imposed a company specific preliminary rate of 24.12% to be posted 
by cash deposits on the exports from Canada of softwood lumber to the U.S. on or after April 28, 
2017.  On June 26, 2017, the USDOC issued its preliminary determination in the antidumping 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 106 - 

duty (“ADD”) investigation and imposed a company specific preliminary rate of 6.76% to be 
posted by cash deposits on the exports from Canada of softwood lumber to the U.S. on or after 
June 30, 2017.  The requirement that we deposit CVD was suspended on August 24, 2017 until 
final determination was published by the USITC.  On December 4, 2017 the USDOC amended 
our CVD rate to 17.99% and our ADD rate to 5.57%.  Effective December 28, 2017 we began 
posting cash deposits for CVD and effective December 4, 2017 we began posting cash deposits 
for ADD at the revised rates.  The CVD and ADD rates are subject to further adjustment through 
administrative reviews to be completed by the USDOC.  The administrative reviews for each of 
CVD and ADD are expected to commence in January 2019 and cover the periods from initiation 
of duties to December 31, 2017 for CVD and to November 30, 2018 for ADD.  The reviews may 
not be finalized until June 2020 or later and the results are subject to appeals. 

In 2017 we incurred deposits of $53 million related to CVD.  We have recorded a long-term duty 
deposit receivable related to CVD of $11 million representing the excess of deposits made at the 
preliminary rate of 24.12% compared to the final rate of 17.99% as we believe this will be the 
maximum rate determined in the administrative review.   

In 2017 we incurred deposits of $32 million related to ADD.  We have performed a calculation 
of potential ADD based on the actual information that will be submitted for the administrative 
review using the same calculation methodology as the USDOC and determined that the expected 
ADD rate will be substantially lower than the rate estimated by the USDOC.  We have recorded 
a long-term duty deposit receivable for the difference between the deposit rate and our estimated 
rate in the amount of $26 million. 

We, together with other Canadian forest product companies and the Canadian federal and 
provincial governments (the “Canadian Interests”) categorically deny the allegations by the 
coalition of U.S. lumber producers and disagree with the countervailing and antidumping 
determinations by the USDOC and the USITC.  The Canadian Interests continue to aggressively 
defend the Canadian industry in this trade dispute and have appealed the decisions to North 
America Free Trade Agreement panels and the World Trade Organization. 

The duty rates are subject to change based on administrative reviews and appeals available to us.  
Notwithstanding the deposit rates assigned under the investigations, our final liability for the 
assessment of CVD and ADD will not be determined until each annual administrative review 
process is complete and related appeal processes are concluded. 

 
 
- 107 - 

FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL REVIEW 
(in millions of Canadian dollars, except where indicated) 
2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

Earnings
Sales
Cost of product sold
Freight and other distribution costs
Export duties or taxes
Amortization
Selling, general and administration
Equity-based compensation
Restructuring charges
Operating earnings
Finance expense
Other
Tax recovery (provision)
Earnings

Cash flows from operating activities

Capital expenditures & acquisitions

Financial position
Current assets
PPE & timber licenses
Goodwill & other intangibles
Other assets
Deferred income tax assets
Total assets
Current liabilities
Long-term debt (including current portion)
Other liabilities
Deferred income tax liabilities
Shareholders' equity
Total liabilities & equity

5,134
3,124
653
48
210
197
32
-
870
(31)
7
(250)
596

902

862

1,291
2,425
731
64
6
4,517
583
636
347
225
2,726
4,517

4,450
2,971
629
-
197
176
(5)
-
482
(29)
(9)
(118)
326

689

273

938
2,236
371
20
35
3,600
459
413
272
215
2,241
3,600

4,100
2,874
627
29
191
153
(23)
-
249
(29)
(64)
(52)
104

301

296

971
2,179
369
36
80
3,635
606
423
269
190
2,147
3,635

3,856
2,538
548
-
170
149
45
-
406
(26)
(5)
(116)
259

475

618

907
1,999
350
79
62
3,397
616
354
244
154
2,029
3,397

3,474
2,260
491
9
160
131
54
24
345
(29)
1
32
349

419

358

971
1,633
321
83
96
3,104
454
328
197
178
1,947
3,104  

      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
         
         
         
         
         
           
            
           
            
             
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
           
            
          
           
           
            
            
            
            
           
         
         
         
         
         
          
          
          
          
          
             
            
          
            
             
        
        
          
        
           
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
      
         
         
         
         
      
      
      
      
      
         
         
         
         
         
           
           
           
           
           
             
           
           
           
           
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
- 108 - 

Per common share (dollars)1
Basic EPS
Price range - high
                  - low
                  - close
Dividends declared per share
Shares outstanding at year-end ('000s)

Ratios (before unusual items)
Adjusted EBITDA margin2
Return on capital employed
Return on common shareholders' equity
Net debt to capitalization

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

7.63
83.50
42.98
77.57
0.36
77,946

4.06
54.18
35.35
48.01
0.28
78,163

1.25
78.55
40.56
52.53
0.28
82,457

3.06
66.80
45.05
66.47
0.28
83,527

4.07
52.67
36.25
51.80
0.28
85,672

23%
17%
24%
12%

15%
11%
15%
14%

10%
4%
5%
22%

16%
10%
13%
19%

17%
15%
21%
8%

Number of employees at year-end

8,600

7,800

7,900

7,560

7,300

Production
Lumber (MMfbm)
Pulp (Mtonnes)
Newsprint (Mtonnes)
Plywood (3/8" MMsf)
MDF (3/4" MMsf)3
LVL (Mcf)
1.  Per share amounts prior to 2014 have been adjusted to take into account the 2014 stock dividend which had the same 
effect as a two-for-one stock split.
2.  Adjusted EBITDA is described in the section 
3.  A fire at our MDF plant in Quesnel on March 9, 2016 resulted in the closure of the plant until April 29, 2017.

5,935
1,192
128
826

5,293
1,086
132
771

6,233
1,172
122
838

5,607
1,142
133
797

160
2,215

206
1,796

191
2,676

220
1,627

5,153
1,099
119
781

204
1,848

      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
    
    
    
    
 
 
- 109 - 

CORPORATE INFORMATION 
Effective February 14, 2018 

DIRECTORS 

Henry H. Ketcham 

Reid E. Carter 

John N. Floren 

Brian G. Kenning 

John K. Ketcham 

Gerald J. Miller 

Robert L. Phillips 

Janice G. Rennie 

Ted Seraphim 

Principal Occupation 

Chairman of the Board 

President, Brookfield Timberlands Management LP 

President and Chief Executive Officer, Methanex 
Corporation 

Corporate Director 

Real Estate Developer 

Corporate Director 

Corporate Director 

Corporate Director 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

Gillian D. Winckler 

Corporate Director 

OFFICERS 

Office Held 

Ted Seraphim 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

Raymond W. Ferris 

Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer 

Brian A. Balkwill 

Keith D. Carter 

Larry E. Gardner 

James W. Gorman 

Rodger M. Hutchinson 

Vice-President, Canadian Lumber 

Vice-President, Pulp and Energy Operations 

Vice-President, Canadian Woodlands 

Vice-President, Corporate and Government Relations 

Vice-President, Corporate Controller and Investor 
Relations 

Christopher D. McIver 

Vice-President, Sales and Marketing 

Sean P. McLaren 

Tom V. Theodorakis 

Vice-President, U.S. Lumber 

Secretary 
Partner, McMillan LLP (lawyers) 

Christopher A. Virostek 

Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer 

Chuck H. Watkins 

Vice-President, U.S. Lumber Manufacturing 

 
 
 
- 110 - 

Corporate Information 
Effective February 14, 2018 

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 
The Annual General Meeting of the 
shareholders of the Company will be held on 
April 19, 2018 at 11:30 a.m. at Quesnel, 
British Columbia, Canada. 

AUDITORS 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 

LEGAL COUNSEL 
McMillan LLP 
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 

TRANSFER AGENT 
AST Trust Company (Canada) 
Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, and Montreal, 
Canada 

FILINGS 
www.sedar.com 

Shares are listed on the Toronto Stock 
Exchange under the symbol: WFT 

INVESTOR CONTACTS 
Chris Virostek 
Vice-President, Finance and 
Chief Financial Officer 

Rodger Hutchinson 
Vice-President, Corporate Controller and 
Investor Relations 

Tel:  (604) 895-2700 
Fax:  (604) 681-6061 

E-mail Address 
shareholder@westfraser.com 

WEBSITE 
www.westfraser.com 

CORPORATE OFFICE 
858 Beatty Street, Suite 501 
Vancouver, British Columbia 
Canada  V6B 1C1 
Tel:  (604) 895-2700 
Fax:  (604) 681-6061 

SALES OFFICES 

SPF Lumber 
Plywood 
MDF 
LVL 
1250 Brownmiller Road 
Quesnel, British Columbia 
Canada  V2J 6P5 
Tel:  (250) 992-9254 
Fax:  (250) 992-3034 

SPF Export Lumber 
858 Beatty Street, Suite 501 
Vancouver, British Columbia 
Canada  V6B 1C1 
Tel:  (604) 895-2700 
Fax:  (604) 681-6061 

SYP Lumber 
1900 Exeter Road, Suite 105 
Germantown, Tennessee 
USA  38138 
Tel:  (901) 620-4200 
Fax:  (901) 620-4204 

2500 Saint Marys Road 
St. Marys, Georgia 
USA  31558 
Tel:  (912) 576-0300 
Fax:  (912) 576-0322 

 
 
 
 
 
- 111 - 

Pulp & Paper 

Cariboo Pulp & Paper 
P.O. Box 7500 
50 North Star Road 
Quesnel, British Columbia 
Canada  V2J 3J6 
Tel:  (250) 992-0200 
Fax:  (250) 992-2164 

Quesnel River Pulp 
1000 Finning Road 
Quesnel, British Columbia 
Canada  V2J 6A1 
Tel:  (250) 992-8919 
Fax:  (250) 992-2612 

Hinton Pulp 
760 Switzer Drive 
Hinton, Alberta 
Canada  T7V 1V7 
Tel:  (780) 865-2251 
Fax:  (780) 865-6666 

Slave Lake Pulp 
P.O. Box 1790 
Slave Lake, Alberta 
Canada  T0G 2A0 
Tel:  (780) 849-7777 
Fax:  (780) 849-7725 

Alberta Newsprint Company 
Postal Bag 9000 
Whitecourt, Alberta 
Canada  T7S 1P9 
Tel:  (780) 778-7000 
Fax:  (780) 778-7070

Pulp 
858 Beatty Street, Suite 501 
Vancouver, British Columbia 
Canada  V6B 1C1 
Tel:  (604) 895-2700 
Fax:  (604) 681-6061 

Newsprint 
2900 – 650 West Georgia Street 
Vancouver, British Columbia 
Canada  V6B 4N8 
Tel:  (604) 681-8817 
Fax:  (604) 681-8861 

OPERATIONS 

Lumber, Plywood and LVL 

Canadian Operations 
1250 Brownmiller Road 
Quesnel, British Columbia 
Canada  V2J 6P5 
Tel:  (250) 992-9244 
Fax:  (250) 992-9233 

US Operations 
1900 Exeter Road, Suite 105 
Germantown, Tennessee 
USA  38138 
Tel:  (901) 620-4200 
Fax:  (901) 620-4204 

MDF 

WestPine 
300 Carradice Road 
Quesnel, British Columbia 
Canada  V2J 5Z7 
Tel:  (250) 991-7100 
Fax:  (250) 991-7115 

Ranger Board 
P.O. Box 6 
Blue Ridge, Alberta 
Canada  T0E 0B0 
Tel:  (780) 648-6333 
Fax:  (780) 648-6397 

SPF Dimension lumber 
produced from 
spruce/pine/balsam fir 
species. 

SYP Dimension lumber 
produced from southern 
yellow pine species. 

Ton A unit of weight equal 
to 2,000 pounds, generally 
known as a U.S. ton. 

Tonne A unit of weight in 
the metric system equal to 
one thousand kilograms or 
approximately 2,204 
pounds.  Mtonne means 
one thousand tonnes. 

- 112 - 

GLOSSARY OF INDUSTRY TERMS

AAC Annual Allowable 
Cut 
The volume of timber that 
may be harvested annually 
from a specific timber 
tenure. 

BCTMP Bleached 
Chemithermomechanical 
Pulp 

Dimension Lumber 
Standard commodity 
lumber ranging in sizes 
from 1 x 3’s to 4 x 12’s, in 
various lengths. 

FMA Forest 
Management 
Agreement An FMA is 
granted by the Alberta 
government and entitles 
the holder to establish, 
grow and harvest timber on 
specified lands. 

LVL Laminated Veneer 
Lumber Large sheets of 
veneer bonded together 
with resin then cut to 
lumber equivalent sizes. 

m3 A solid cubic metre, a 
unit of measure for timber, 
equal to approximately 35 
cubic feet. 

Mcf One thousand cubic 
feet. A unit of measure for 
laminated veneer lumber. 

MDF Medium Density 
Fibreboard A composite 
product made from wood 
fibre. 

Mfbm One thousand board 
feet (equivalent to one 
thousand square feet of 
lumber, one inch thick).  
MMfbm means one 
million board feet. 

Msf A unit of measure for 
MDF and plywood equal 
to one thousand square feet 
on a 3/4 inch basis for 
MDF and on a 3/8 inch 
basis for plywood.  MMsf 
means one million square 
feet. 

NBSK Northern Bleached 
Softwood Kraft Pulp 

Return on Capital 
Employed Earnings before 
after-tax financing expense 
divided by average assets 
less average current non-
interest bearing liabilities. 

Return on Common 
Shareholders' Equity 
Earnings available to 
common shareholders 
divided by average 
shareholders’ equity. 

 
 
WEST FRASER TIMBER CO. LTD.
Tel: 604.895.2700
Fax: 604.681.6061
westfraser.com