Quarterlytics / Industrials / Aerospace & Defense / Woodward / FY2001 Annual Report

Woodward
Annual Report 2001

WWD · NASDAQ Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker WWD
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Industrials
Industry Aerospace & Defense
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2001 Annual Report · Woodward
Loading PDF…
A N N U A L

R E P O R T

2 0 0 1

S U S TA I N A B LE G R O W T H

WOODWARD GOVE RNOR COMPANY

 
S U S TA I N A B LE G R O W T H

We will expand our customer base

and gain market share through our

product development efforts,

strategic acquisitions and alliances, 

and operational improvements.

The investments Woodward 

makes today will create

a stronger Woodward tomorrow.

Business Description

Woodward designs, manufactures, 

and services energy control systems

and components for aircraft and

industrial engines, turbines, and other

power equipment. Leading OEMs

(original equipment manufacturers)

throughout the world use our products

and services in the power generation,

process industries, transportation, and

aerospace markets. 

Contents

Financial Highlights   1 

To All Shareholders   2

Market Drivers Shape Our Strategy   5

Financial Section   13

Board of Directors   37

Officers and Investor Information   38

F i n a n c i a l   H i g h l i g h t s
Fiscal year ended September 30,

(In thousands except per share amounts and other year-end data)
Operating Results

Net sales
Net earnings
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Cash dividends per share
Year-end Financial Position

Working capital
Total assets
Long-term debt
Shareholders’ equity

Other Year-end Data

Shareholders’ equity per diluted share
Worker members
Registered shareholder members

2001

2000

1999

$678,791
53,068
4.69
4.59
.93

123,744
584,628
77,000
318,862

$0027.58
3,709
1,652

$597,385

46,976 *
4.17 *
4.15 *
.93

100,836
533,723
74,500
275,624

$0024.35
3,302
1,742

$596,904
30,829
2.74
2.73
.93

124,392
550,664
139,000
241,992

$0021.43
3,791
1,866

*Net earnings include a gain from the sale of business, net of tax, of $17,082 or $1.52 per basic share and $1.51 per diluted share for 2000. Without
this item, net earnings would have been $29,894 or $2.65 per basic share and $2.64 per diluted share for 2000.

Net Sales
Dollars in Millions

Net Earnings*
Dollars in Millions

Net Earnings and
Cash Dividends Per Share*
In Dollars

700

630

560

490

420

350

280

210

140

70

0

97

98

99

00

01

60

54

48

42

36

30

24

18

12

6

0

5.00

4.50

4.00

3.50

3.00

2.50

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50

97

98

99

00

01

0.00

Net Earnings per diluted share

Cash Dividends per share

97

98

99

00

01

12

1

(cid:1)
(cid:1)
To All Shareholders

It was an outstanding year. We attribute 
the excellent results in fiscal year 2001 to the
successful execution of our energy control
technologies strategy.  

Over the past few years, we have added significant
technology capability and product offerings through our
internal product development efforts and acquisitions and
alliances. We have leveraged this extensive capability
over all types of power equipment and market
applications—providing our customers with innovative,
practical, and cost-effective system solutions. As a result,
we have been steadily displacing our competitors and
gaining market share.

This fiscal year, in our industrial business we introduced
more than 30 new products. One example is a new line of
gas and liquid fuel system valves for large industrial
turbines (greater than 50 MW). Since fiscal year 2000, we
went from no sales for large gas turbine valves to almost
$3 million. We expect our sales from this one product
family to reach $14 million next fiscal year and continue
to grow. Other new products launched will demonstrate
similar successes. 

Next fiscal year, we anticipate even more market share
gains from our product development efforts. We plan to
double our product introductions compared to this fiscal
year. We are leveraging our fundamental technologies 
to rapidly introduce systems to help our customers
produce more reliable, efficient, and cost-effective 
power equipment. 

General Electric Aircraft Engines awarded our Aircraft
Engine Systems business two new long-term contracts—
one for fuel metering units on the GE90-115B that
supports the extended-range Boeing 777; the other for
fuel metering units and actuators on the CF34-10 engines
that will power the Embraer ERJ-190 and Fairchild
Dornier 928JET regional jets. 

In fiscal year 2001, we continued to strengthen customer
relationships by achieving even higher levels of product
quality, improving development and manufacturing cycle
times, meeting aggressive delivery schedules, and
providing competitive pricing by executing aggressive
cost-reduction initiatives. 

2

The Woodward management team strategically leads with their
experience and knowledge about our company, industries, and markets.

(Sitting) John A. Halbrook, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Standing l-r) Stephen P. Carter, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer;
C. Phillip Turner, Vice President and General Manager, Aircraft Engine Systems; and
Thomas A. Gendron, Vice President and General Manager, Industrial Controls.

We achieved these improvements by continuing and
building on our commitment to lean manufacturing
principles and Six Sigma methodologies. In addition, we
intensified our customer support and service through the
Internet. We plan to continue with our e-Business efforts
in fiscal year 2002 by further enhancing our customer
support capabilities.

Growth through targeted acquisitions,
alliances, and partnerships

We will continue to achieve market share growth by
expanding our technologies and products through
acquisitions, alliances, and partnerships. We carefully
seek technologies and product lines that align with our
energy control technologies strategy and adapt to a wide
range of power equipment applications. 

Our first major acquisition, Fuel Systems Textron,
acquired in 1998, created new business opportunities by
broadening our capabilities. Through this acquisition, we
gained technologies and products that we leveraged with
other Woodward offerings to increase our market share in
the aerospace and industrial turbine markets. By
combining the strengths of both companies, we have
grown our customer base and increased our content on
power equipment. Since the acquisition, we have
doubled our fuel nozzle sales for gas turbines. 

This fiscal year we completed a number of significant
activities that broadened and enhanced our technology
and product offerings:

• Teamed with Snecma Control Systems to provide fuel

control systems for the Pratt & Whitney Canada
PW600 family of engines

• Acquired Hoeflich Controls and finalized a licensing
agreement with Adrenaline Research to add ignition
systems for industrial gas engines

• Formed an alliance with Edward King AG to supply

integrated gas turbine fuel systems

• Collaborated with Leonhard-Reglerbau to sell and

service monitoring, control, and protection devices for
power generation equipment

• Acquired the Bryce diesel fuel injection equipment

operation from Delphi Automotive Systems to expand
our capabilities and product lines

These acquisitions and partnerships added more than 
$11 million in sales for fiscal year 2001. We plan to leverage
the new technologies and products to achieve even stronger
results in the future. Our solid financial position enables us
to continue seeking acquisitions that add to our technology
base and product lines. 

Our market outlook
Our world has changed dramatically since the September 11,
2001, terrorist attacks. Of our four broad target markets—
aerospace, power generation, process industries, and trans-
portation—aerospace has been the most directly affected. At
this writing, our key industrial markets have not been
materially affected beyond the general economic trends. 

We have not yet fully quantified the negative impact on the
commercial aircraft industry. However, we will see a near-
term reduction in demand for new systems, spare parts, and
overhauls and have taken steps to prepare for this impact. 

We remain optimistic about the long-term future of
commercial aircraft and the opportunities for Woodward. In
addition, we serve other aerospace markets that we expect to
remain relatively healthy: business jets, military aircraft
engines, and aeroderivative gas turbines. For fiscal year
2002, we believe military sales will increase about 15 to 20
percent. And, despite near-term shortfalls, our large installed
base of products will continue to provide a source of
profitable aftermarket sales and service. 

In the power generation market, there is a critical, long-term
need for clean, reliable, and dependable power. Our
customers’ projections for product demand remain high,
particularly for large gas turbine systems used in base load
plants, where Woodward has significantly increased market
share in the past few years. Also, orders for distributed
power generation equipment, according to industry surveys,
indicate a continued growing demand. This equipment is
driven by small engines, turbines, and fuel cells powered by
natural gas and diesel fuels. Woodward has very strong
product offerings in all these areas.

S U S TA I N A B LE G R O W T H

We will continue to achieve market share

We carefully seek technologies and product 

growth by expanding our technologies and

lines that align with our energy control technologies 

products through acquisitions, alliances,
and partnerships.

strategy and adapt to a wide range of power 

equipment applications.

3

In the process industries, particularly natural gas, business
is strong. We will likely see growth rates above general
economic trends. The amount of pipeline growth, gas
drilling sites, and upgrades to existing pipelines is strong,
especially in the U.S. This translates into a need for new
compressors, engines, and turbines, where Woodward’s
systems play key roles. 

We are working to help our customers in the
transportation sector meet the demand for fuel and
control system upgrades on locomotives and ships to
improve reliability and meet emissions regulations
worldwide. We expect to increase our market share with
products that answer our customers’ needs and reduce
their total installed costs.

Financial performance
Our net earnings rose 45 percent in fiscal year 2001 to
$53.1 million or $4.59 per diluted share over last year’s
earnings before certain items. Net earnings in fiscal year
2000 were $47.0 million or $4.15 per diluted share, but
included an after-tax gain of $17.1 million or $1.51 per
diluted share and certain expenses netting to $6.7 million
or $0.59 per diluted share. The gain resulted from the
sale of our turbine control retrofit business, and the
expenses were related to streamlining operations after the
sale, realigning our workforce, and certain other items.

Staying the course
While we will be negatively impacted over the next two
years by the current market disruptions, we believe we
have the right formula in place. Our performance over the
last several years reflects our ability to build upon and
execute our energy control technologies strategy. We
remain committed to expanding our customer base 
and realizing market share growth by developing and
introducing new products, making acquisitions, 
and finding partnership opportunities. 

During fiscal year 2001, we set 15 percent average annual
net earnings growth, before one-time items, as our goal
for the next three to four years. Although we significantly
beat that pace for fiscal 2001, weakness in the
commercial aerospace industry, accelerated by the events
of September 2001, will likely result in lower than
normal results for Aircraft Engine Systems in fiscal years
2002 and 2003. However, we believe that strength in
Industrial Controls will cushion the effects of lower

4

Aircraft Engine Systems’ results and that net earnings for
fiscal year 2002 will approximate those of fiscal year
2001—within a range of plus or minus 5 percent—before
the effect of new accounting standards for goodwill and
other intangible assets.

For planning purposes—for which there are many
uncertain variables—we are currently assuming that any
additional decrease in Aircraft Engine Systems’ results in
2003 will be much smaller than in 2002. Total company
results could show some growth in 2003, possibly even
approaching our 15 percent growth goal, depending on
the strength of our industrial markets. 

Over the long term, we still expect to achieve the 
15 percent goal based on two fundamental beliefs. First,
we believe Aircraft Engine Systems is well positioned to
manage the industry cycle and will stabilize and recover
quickly when conditions normalize and improve. Second,
we believe that our strategies at Industrial Controls will
provide opportunities to grow above and beyond industry
growth rates in its key markets.

In closing, I want to thank our Woodward members for
their dedication and enthusiasm. I am very proud of our
talented and creative workforce. Also, I want to
acknowledge our management team for helping make
fiscal year 2001 a success. Finally, I want to express my
gratitude to our directors who help to ensure we make the
best decisions for our shareholders. We welcomed a new
board member this fiscal year—Paul Donovan, senior 
vice president and chief financial officer of Wisconsin
Energy Corporation. 

When we combine the strengths of these three groups—
our members, our management team, and our Board of
Directors—the result is a team ready to meet the
challenges that lie ahead. 

John A. Halbrook
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer

December 6, 2001

Market Drivers Shape Our Energy Control Technologies Strategy

Power Generation

Transportation

9%

Process Industries
11%

Aerospace  (cid:2) Military
9%

Aerospace  (cid:2)

Commercial

40%

FY2001 Sales
$678,791
(in thousands)

31%

Power Generation

Transportation

Process Industries

Aerospace

• Power Plants

• Marine Propulsion

• Oil and Gas 

• Distributed Power

• Locomotive 

• Petro Chemical

• Commercial

• Military

• Back-Up Power

• Off-Highway Equipment

• Paper

• Business/General Aviation

Our customers include:
Alstom
Caterpillar
Emerson Electric
GE Power Systems
Kawasaki
Mitsubishi
Pratt & Whitney
Siemens-Westinghouse
Wärtsilä

• Alternative-Fuel Trucks 

• Sugar

and Buses

Our customers include:
Caterpillar
Caterpillar Kiel
Cummins
General Motors EMD
GE Transportation Systems
MAN Group
Wärtsilä

Our customers include:
Dresser-Rand
Ebara
GE Power Systems
Mitsubishi
Rolls-Royce

• Aftermarket Services 

and Support

Our customers include:
GE Aircraft Engines
Honeywell
Pratt & Whitney
Pratt & Whitney Canada
Rolls-Royce
Rolls-Royce Deutschland
U.S. Government
Williams International
Major airlines worldwide

T H E   M A R K E TS W E   S E R V E

The demand for clean, reliable, and dependable power generation will continue strongly

over the next several years, providing attractive market opportunities for Woodward.

Additionally, the installed base of power equipment in ships, trains, and stationary

applications will require upgrades to fuel and control systems. In the process industry,

natural gas exploration and distribution is growing globally. The aerospace market is

expected to provide long-term growth with near-term opportunities, particularly for both
military and aeroderivative engine applications. 

5

Leveraging Woodward's Energy Control Technologies

TECHNOLOGIES

COMPONENTS

INTEGRATED SYSTEMS

Fuel and Gas
Delivery

• valves
• fuel metering units
• actuators
• pumps
• servocomponents

Combustion
Control

• ignition systems
• gas turbine fuel nozzles
• gas engine fuel injection
• diesel fuel injection

Electronic Controls
and Software

• diesel and gas 
engine controls

• steam turbine controls
• gas turbine controls
• propeller synchronizers

Catalytic and Electro
Chemical Process
Control

• catalytic combustion 

controls and algorithms

• fuel cell controls

Integrated digital control system

Integrated fuel syste

Systems 
Integration

• integrated fuel systems
• power management 

controls

• application engineering

Integrated fuel delivery system

Services

• product support
• repair and overhaul
• global distribution

Integrated combustio

1

Woodward uses its energy control
technologies to develop and produce 
an extensive line of components.

2

We design and integrate our components 
into systems to provide cost effective solutions 
for our customers’ power equipment.

6

(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
POWER EQUIPMENT

MARKET APPLICATIONS

A E R O S P AA C EC E
A E R O S P

Aerospace 
Gas Turbines 
and Turbo Props

T I O N
P O W E R   G E N E R AA T I O N
P O W E R   G E N E R

Industrial/
Aeroderivative 
Gas Turbines

Diesel 
Engines

Fuel
Cells

Steam 
Turbines

Gas 
Engines

Switchgear
Power
Management

Microturbines

m

P R O C E S S   I N D U S
P R O C E

S S   I N D U S T R I E

T R I E SS

Diesel 
Engines

Industrial/
Aeroderivative 
Gas Turbines

Gas 
Engines

Steam 
Turbines

T RT R A N S P O R T

T I O N
A N S P O R T AA T I O N

n system

Diesel 
Engines

Gas 
Engines

Industrial/
Aeroderivative 
Gas Turbines

3

Our customers choose Woodward’s 
systems and components for their 
power equipment to reduce emissions 
and optimize performance.

4

The power equipment, which uses
Woodward’s systems and components, 
keeps the global infrastructure working.

7

(cid:3)
Woodward's System Solutions Help Our
Customers Achieve Success

The demands on our customers have been increasing steadily.  More than ever,

engines, turbines, and other power equipment must be reliable, clean burning,

and efficient. Our proven energy control technologies strategy—built on a

foundation of internal product development complemented with strategic

acquisitions, alliances, and partnerships—helps customers meet the most

stringent market-driven requirements. Woodward’s aerospace and industrial

businesses focus on providing system solutions to industry leaders.

Meeting aerospace customer needs

Based on market needs, Woodward leverages
core technologies to develop versatile product
lines for a full range of aircraft gas turbine
engines. Currently, our Aircraft Engine
Systems business is designing a new fuel
metering unit and actuators for the General
Electric CF34-10 engine that will power the
Embraer ERJ-190 and Fairchild Dornier
928JET regional jets. By providing technically
advanced products to meet our customers’
critical performance, weight, and cost
requirements, Woodward continues to support
the developing regional jet market.

Aircraft engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney
Canada (P&WC) selected Woodward to
design and develop an integrated, low-cost
fuel control and electronic engine control
system for its new PW600 turbofan engine
family. Aircraft Engine Systems teamed with

Traditionally,

Woodward Aircraft

Engine Systems

produces servovalves

for aircraft fuel,

electrical, and

environmental

control systems.

These servovalves

also serve the

medical equipment

market for surgical

equipment such as

this Datex-Ohmeda

anesthesia ventilator.

Snecma Control Systems of France to win the
PW600 contract, while maintaining full system
level responsibility. 

By providing P&WC with a single source for
the development and integration of the
complete engine control system, Woodward
demonstrated its ability to apply its engine fuel
delivery system strategy. The PW600 concept,
slated to be produced in turboshaft, turboprop,
and turbofan variations, is forecasted as a high-
volume production program for the light
helicopter, general aviation, and small business
jet markets.

After years of market leadership and robust
sales in the commercial and military aircraft gas
turbine engine market, we support our large
installed base of systems, sub-systems, and
components with responsive product sales and
service in support of our customers’ increasing
aftermarket needs. 

Timothy Parent,

Woodward Aircraft

Engine Systems

Development Lab Lead

Technician, examines

a proportional

metering unit for the

fuel system prototype

to be installed on the

Pratt & Whitney
Canada PW600
demonstration engine.

While maintaining

system level

responsibility, we

teamed with Snecma

Control Systems to

develop and integrate

the complete engine

control system.

8

Aircraft Engine Systems anticipates that the
large installed base of our military engine fuel
controls and fuel injection components will
lead to an increase in aftermarket business.
We believe in the next fiscal year we will
achieve a 15 to 20 percent increase in military
sales, primarily for products used on the
Blackhawk and Apache helicopters, the F-15
Eagle air superiority jet, and the F-16
Fighting Falcon jet combat aircraft. We will
also continue remanufacturing engine fuel
controls for cruise missiles.

Beyond our current military product offerings,
we are qualifying our fuel system components
for the new Pratt & Whitney F119 and F135
engines. These engines will power the latest
generation of fighter aircraft—the F-22 Raptor
and Joint Strike Fighter (both being built by

Lockheed Martin). Also, we are competing for
similar components on the GE/Rolls-Royce
F120 engine, an alternate engine being
developed for the fighter aircraft.

To support the growing demand for clean and
efficient power generation and marine
products, Aircraft Engine Systems produces
advanced, low-emission fuel nozzle products
for aeroderivative gas turbines. Aeroderivatives
are aircraft gas turbines modified for use in the
industrial market. Currently, we produce fuel
delivery systems, combustion products, and
controls for aeroderivative gas turbines
manufactured by General Electric, Pratt &
Whitney, and Rolls-Royce. We expect this to
remain a dynamic market now and in the 
near future. 

Sandy Garcia works 

in the Military Spray 

Ring Cell in Zeeland,

Michigan. These Pratt
& Whitney F100
augmentor spray

rings, used on F-16

and F-15 aircraft, are

ready for pressure 

and flow testing.

9

advanced digital control technologies within 
the actuator, the new ProAct Digital Plus™
actuators are easily networked into today’s 
high-technology engines, while reducing our
customers’ total installation costs. 

Complementing our business through
acquisitions and alliances

To improve time to market and broaden our
product offerings, acquisitions and alliances are
key to our growth strategy. In early fiscal 2001,
we added ignition systems to our current
product offerings for industrial gas engines by
acquiring Hoeflich Controls, Inc. (HCI) and
completing a licensing agreement with
Adrenaline Research for advanced ignition
technology. We now have a full complement of
technologies to provide complete, integrated
systems for natural gas engines used in electric
power, oil and gas processing, and industrial 
off-road vehicles.

Our advanced ignition controls, which optimize
combustion processes, help natural gas engines
improve their fuel efficiency and reduce
emissions. With the acquisition of HCI, we won
business at several of the world’s largest gas
engine manufacturers. We delivered and
shipped a number of new ignition control
products this fiscal year. We will continue
releasing new ignition control systems and
components that provide solutions for natural
gas engine manufacturers.

New products for industrial markets

In fiscal 2001, our Industrial Controls business
introduced several new gas and liquid fuel
valves for large industrial gas turbines. With
these products, Woodward captured about 30
percent of the heavy-frame gas turbine fuel
control market, and we expect to make further
market share gains in fiscal 2002. 

For natural gas applications, the new
SonicFlo™ valve integrates the gas valve and
actuator into a single compact assembly. More
importantly, the SonicFlo valve features
increased fuel delivery accuracy at reduced
system pressure drops, ensuring each stage of
a dry low emissions combustion system gets
the precise amount of flow required. The
SonicFlo helps our gas turbine original
equipment manufacturers achieve higher fuel
efficiencies and reduce emissions. 

A companion product to the SonicFlo valve,
the new Woodward Gas Stop/Ratio valve
actuator combines two functions into a single,
modular product that accommodates a variety
of stroke, force output, and mechanical
interface arrangements.

For fuel oil applications, Woodward has
successfully introduced two types of valves: a
three-way bypass and a three-way stop valve.
The valves feature a fully integrated valve
and actuator design that dramatically reduces
the installed cost and package size. Our
compact design is more than 50 percent
smaller than the competition.

A key platform product, also introduced by
Industrial Controls this fiscal year, was a range
of electric actuators designed for mid-size gas
engines and turbines. By incorporating our

Integrated fuel skids, a product line resulting from our

alliance with Edward King AG, are the total fuel delivery

system for industrial gas turbines. Based on Woodward

Industrial Controls’ gas valve and actuation technologies,
these systems increase fuel delivery accuracy to the gas

turbine combustion system.

Compact liquid stop 

and bypass valves, 

manufactured at 

Woodward’s Fort

Collins, Colorado,

facility, are used in

the heavy frame

industrial turbine

market to precisely

control fuel flow. 

Our ignition controls

improve fuel efficiency

and reduce emissions

by optimizing

combustion processes

in natural gas

engines. This fiscal

year Woodward

Industrial Controls

added ignition

systems to our

product lines through

the Hoeflich Controls,

Inc. acquisition.

10

Assembly Operators John Brown (back) and Sylvester

Pump Cylinder Cell Operator Wolfgang Jasyk from the Woodward Diesel Systems 

Newby (front) build mechanical pumps for General

Center of Excellence in Aken, Germany, checks the body of a high-pressure fuel

Electric locomotive diesel engines at our newly-acquired

injection electro-hydraulic control valve for use on natural gas engines.

facility in Cheltenham, England. 

We formed an alliance with Edward King AG to
design, develop, supply, and service integrated
fuel skids for gas turbine original equipment
manufacturers. Through this alliance, we
became the only supplier that can provide an
integrated fuel system from concept through
field installation. Consequently, our customers
can improve their time to market, manage
capacity issues, and reduce total costs.

Among the first products from this partnership
are six integrated fuel delivery systems
produced for an industrial gas turbine
installation in Canada. Based on a system of
Woodward gas fuel control valves, these fuel
skids are essential elements in the performance
of this combined-cycle power project.

Collaborating with Leonhard-Reglerbau,
Stuttgart, Germany, marked another strategic
addition to our energy control technologies
portfolio. Woodward is now the only company
able to provide networked system solutions 
in the distributed power and power generation
markets. By expanding our product line this
way, Woodward offers complete networked
solutions that reduce costs and are easy 
to install.

This agreement better positions Woodward to
support the power generation industry and to
meet the growing global demands for new
electric power sources, ranging from 300 MW
down to a few kW. Included in the product
sales agreement were generator set controls,
digital synchronizers, multi-function protective
relays, and a low-cost digital speed governor—
all designed to network easily with Woodward’s
on-engine controls.

Finally, in the industrial arena, Woodward
significantly expanded its portfolio of fuel
injection technologies for heavy industrial
diesel engines by acquiring the Bryce fuel
injection business in England from Delphi
Automotive Systems. Now named Woodward
Diesel Systems, this facility and our plant in
Germany comprise the Woodward Diesel
Systems Center of Excellence. This acquisition
created an opportunity for Woodward to be the
core fuel control supplier for one of the world’s
largest marine engine manufacturers. Woodward
will provide an advanced fuel injection system
for the next generation of ultra-clean, low-
emission diesel engines.

Through our 

collaboration with

Leonhard-Reglerbau,

we network their 

generator set controls,

protective relays, 

and other power 

management products

with Woodward 

Industrial Controls’

products to provide

system solutions in

the distributed 

power and power 

generation markets.

11

Design for Six Sigma

(DFSS) entails using

standard procedures

throughout the

development process

to ensure the highest

quality product is

produced at the lowest

total cost, in the

shortest cycle time.

Craig Bliss, Aircraft

Engine Systems

designer, works on the

fuel-metering valve

design on the Pratt &
Whitney PW600
project, using these

DFSS concepts.

Ricardo Lozano,

quality representative,

operates a hone in the

Flyweight Cell at

Woodward Aircraft

Engine Systems. 

By applying lean

manufacturing

principles to 

improve operational

performance, the 

lead-time on

flyweights was

reduced from forty 

to five days. 

12

Fuel injection systems are vital to diesel
engines used in the power generation, marine,
and locomotive industries and are key to
reducing emissions and improving engine fuel
efficiency. By bringing these engine
components together into a networked engine
system, Woodward can provide customers
with comprehensive solutions that meet their
needs for cost, performance, and reliability.

Operational excellence is our focus

Woodward enhances our sound business
strategy by focusing on operational excellence.
By emphasizing lean manufacturing principles
and rigorously practicing Six Sigma
methodology throughout the company, we
continually improve our product quality,
reduce cycle times, and eliminate waste and
variation from our processes. 

Hundreds of Woodward members participate
as Six Sigma Champions, Black Belts, and
Green Belts. In addition, we have been
training our key suppliers in the Six Sigma

methodology. As we relentlessly pursue
complete customer satisfaction, we remain
committed to embedding a Six Sigma
continuous improvement culture throughout
the entire supply chain. 

A system solutions provider

By leveraging our strong technical 
expertise across the entire organization, 
our complementary technology roadmaps
continue to merge. New products and
expanded market offerings result from this
Woodward-wide approach. These efforts
further enhance our ability to provide our
customers with system solutions. 

Our high value, integrated system solutions
help position our customers to gain a
competitive advantage in the marketplace.
Increasingly, Woodward is becoming the
preferred supplier for leading global original
equipment manufacturers. 

Woodward earns total customer satisfaction by
working closely with customers to gain their
confidence and contribute to their success.
Our commitment to meeting our customers’
needs has its rewards—as the success of our
customers continues, so will Woodward’s. 
We have the right people and processes in
place. By consistently providing our customers
with reliable energy control systems that
enhance performance, improve efficiency, and
reduce emissions, we will remain a leader in
the industry.

F I N A N C I A L S E C T I O N

WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY

C o n t e n t s

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

14

Consolidated Financial Statements 22

Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements 34

Report of Independent Accountants

34

Selected Quarterly Financial Data 35

Cautionary Statement 35

Summary of Operations/Eleven-Year Record 36

13

M a n a g e m e n t ’s   D i s c u s s i o n   a n d   A n a l y s i s

We prepared the following discussion and analysis to
help you better understand our results of operations and
financial condition. This discussion should be read with
the consolidated financial statements and cautionary
statement.

Industrial Controls

In thousands for the year
ended September 30,

External net sales
Segment earnings

2001

2000

1999

$384,145
57,710

$330,962
41,258

$310,038
35,959

Results of Operations

Our results of operations are discussed and analyzed by
segment. We have two operating segments—Industrial
Controls and Aircraft Engine Systems. Industrial
Controls provides energy control systems and
components primarily to OEMs (original equipment
manufacturers) of industrial engines, turbines, and other
power equipment. Aircraft Engine Systems provides
energy control systems and components primarily to
OEMs of aircraft engines.

We use segment earnings internally to assess the
performance of each segment and for making decisions
on the allocation of resources. Total segment earnings do
not reflect all expenses and gains of the company.
Nonsegment expenses and gains, including income taxes,
are separately discussed and analyzed.

2001 Compared to 2000 and Outlook

External net sales of Industrial Controls increased 16% in
2001 over 2000. Increases in sales volumes more than
offset the impact of the sale of our turbine control retrofit
business and negative foreign currency translation effects.

• Strong demand for turbine and engine control

products throughout the world, as well as new product
introductions and market share gains, accounted for
most of our volume increase. We benefited from
continued strength in key end-markets, particularly
power generation. Prices averaged about 1% higher.

• Businesses acquired in November 2000 and June 2001
accounted for approximately $9 million of our volume
increase.

• The sale of our turbine control retrofit business four
months prior to our fiscal year-end in 2000 reduced
our sales by an undetermined amount. We believe this
business had annual sales approaching $50 million.

 • The strengthening of the dollar against most foreign

currencies reduced our sales by 3%.

Several key actions in 2001 broadened the functionality
and scope of our integrated energy control systems.

• We acquired the Bryce diesel fuel injection business of
Delphi Automotive Systems, which extended and
complemented our existing products for the important
medium-speed diesel market.

• We acquired Hoeflich Controls, Inc. and entered into
a licensing agreement with Adrenaline Research to
add to our ignition systems technology for gas
engines.

• We formed an alliance with Leonhard-Reglerbau for
networked system solutions targeting distributed
power and centrally generated power applications,
ranging from a few kilowatts to 300 megawatts.

• We formed an alliance with Edward King AG of

Switzerland, to design, develop, supply, and service
integrated fuel skids for gas turbines.

14

Segment earnings of Industrial Controls increased 40% in
2001 over 2000. In 2000, expenses of approximately $4.2
million that we associate with the decision to sell our
turbine control retrofit business reduced segment earnings.
These expenses primarily involved the relocation of certain
ongoing business activities. Without these expenses, our
segment earnings would have been $45.5 million in 2000,
and our increase in 2001 over 2000 would have been 27%.
This earnings increase was the result of higher sales and
improved segment earnings margins.

• Exclusive of the impact of the sale of our turbine
control retrofit business, our selling, general, and
administrative expenses are relatively independent of
changes in sales volumes.

• The sale of our turbine control retrofit business four
months prior to our fiscal year-end in 2000 impacted
our segment earnings margin by an undetermined
amount. While the retrofit business generated higher
gross margins (which we measure as net sales less cost
of goods sold as a percent of sales) than our remaining
business, it also incurred more selling, general, and
administrative expenses as a percent of sales.

Outlook: We currently expect Industrial Controls’ sales
and earnings to increase between 10% and 15% in 2002
over 2001. Our market share for systems and components
used in power generation, processing, and transportation
markets has been increasing and we expect market share
gains to continue. With increased sales, we also expect to
improve our segment earnings margin.

In addition, we also expect to adopt new accounting
standards in 2002 that impact accounting for goodwill
and other intangible assets, as more fully described near
the end of this management’s discussion and analysis.
Segment earnings are expected to increase by $2.8 million
in 2002 as a result of adopting these new accounting
standards. On a comparable basis, had these new
accounting standards been adopted at the beginning of
2000, segment earnings would have been $2.4 million
higher in 2001 and $2.3 million higher in 2000.

2000 Compared to 1999
External net sales of Industrial Controls increased 7% in
2000 over 1999. Increases in sales volumes more than
offset the impact of the sale of our turbine control retrofit
business, lower average selling prices, and negative
foreign currency translation effects.

• Strong demand in the power generation markets,

primarily benefiting our domestic locations, accounted
for our volume increase. In total, our domestic
locations accounted for approximately 62% of our
2000 sales.

• The sale of our turbine control retrofit business four
months prior to our fiscal year-end in 2000 reduced
our sales by an undetermined amount. We believe this
business had annual sales approaching $50 million.

• Prices averaged about 2% lower, and the

strengthening of the dollar against most foreign
currencies reduced our sales by an additional 2%.

In the third quarter, 2000, we signed a five-year $500
million contract to supply fuel and combustion control
systems and components for a customer’s family of
industrial gas turbines for the power generation, oil and
gas processing, and marine markets. Also, we finalized
other long-term agreements with major industrial
companies that total over $100 million in incremental
business over the next four years.

Segment earnings increased 15% in 2000 over 1999.
Expenses we associate with the decision to sell our
turbine control retrofit business of approximately $4.2
million impacted segment earnings in 2000. These
expenses primarily involved the relocation of certain
ongoing business activities. Without these expenses, our
segment earnings would have been $45.5 million in
2000, an increase of 27% over 1999. This earnings
increase was the result of higher sales and improved
segment earnings margins.

• Selling, general, and administrative expenses

decreased. Our selling, general, and administrative
activities are relatively independent of changes in sales
volumes, and expenses associated with our turbine
control retrofit business were not incurred in the last
four months of 2000 following our sale of that
business. In addition, we benefited from the full-year
impact of improvements made during our
restructuring in the second quarter of 1999. These
expense reductions were offset somewhat by a
provision for a company’s uncollectible receivables of
$0.9 million in 2000.

• Certain land located in The Netherlands was sold in

1999, which resulted in a gain of $1.9 million.

15

Outlook: While we have not been able to determine the
full effects on Aircraft Engine Systems of the tragic
events of September 11, 2001, we currently expect sales
to decrease at least 15% and earnings to decrease at least
20% in 2002 as compared to 2001. For planning
purposes, we are assuming that any additional decrease in
Aircraft Engine Systems’ sales and earnings in 2003 will
be much smaller than in 2002. Commercial aircraft
engines and parts are widely believed to be vulnerable to
a downturn as a result of the terrorist attacks, but we are
well positioned in the markets we serve and should not
be disproportionately affected as a result of overall
market conditions. With decreases in sales, we expect our
segment earnings margin to decrease. However, we have
taken immediate steps to reduce costs to dampen any
negative impact to earnings.

In addition, we also expect to adopt new accounting
standards in 2002 that impact accounting for goodwill
and other intangible assets, as more fully described near
the end of this management’s discussion and analysis.
Segment earnings are expected to increase by $3.5
million in 2002 as a result of adopting these new
accounting standards. On a comparable basis, had these
new accounting standards been adopted at the beginning
of 2000, segment earnings would have been $3.5 million
higher in both 2001 and 2000.

2000 Compared to 1999

External net sales of Aircraft Engine Systems decreased
7% in 2000 from 1999. This decrease was due about
equally to both lower volume and lower average selling
prices. Most of our reduced volumes were in sales related
to aftermarket revenues. We believe the decrease in
aftermarket revenues might have been caused by broader
industry trends, including the lengthening of time
between our customers’ discretionary repair and overhaul
activities, increasing competition from OEMs that have
expanded their own aftermarket service offerings, and
increasing reliability of our components. While most of
our sales are to OEMs, we estimate that about 42% of
our sales resulted from the aftermarket in 2000 compared
to 40% in 1999.

Aircraft Engine Systems

In thousands for the year
ended September 30,

External net sales
Segment earnings

2001

2000

1999

$294,646
53,585

$266,423
38,150

$286,866
54,260

2001 Compared to 2000 and Outlook

External net sales of Aircraft Engine Systems increased
11% in 2001 over 2000. In addition to solid orders for
products used in regional and narrow-body commercial
jets, sales growth was driven by increased demand for
some OEM products, aeroderivative engine nozzles and
controls for power generation applications, military spare
parts, and commercial aftermarket sales. While most of
our sales are to OEMs, we estimate that about 39% of
our sales resulted from the aftermarket in 2001 compared
to 42% in 2000. The impact of changes in selling prices
and changes in foreign currency exchange rates was
insignificant.

Segment earnings increased 40% in 2001 over 2000. In
2000, segment earnings were impacted by expenses
totaling $5.1 million associated with a workforce
management program to align staffing levels with
expected demand. Without these expenses, segment
earnings would have been $43.2 million in 2000, and our
increase in 2001 over 2000 would have been 24%. This
earnings increase was the result of higher sales and
improved segment earnings margins.

• Cost of goods sold was relatively high in the first half

of 2000. Near the end of the second quarter, we
implemented our workforce management program to
align staffing levels with expected demand. Our cost
of goods sold in 2001, as a percent of sales, is
relatively close to the comparable percent in the last
half of 2000.

• Selling, general, and administrative activities are

relatively independent of changes in sales volumes and
did not increase proportionally with sales.

• Partially offsetting the items above, in 2001, we
recognized additional expense due to increased
uncertainty about receivable collections following the
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and we had
higher losses on disposals of equipment. In 2000, we
reduced certain acquisition-related accruals and
recognized insurance proceeds that settled certain
matters from previous years as a reduction in expense.

16

Segment earnings decreased 30% in 2000 from 1999. In
2000, segment earnings were impacted by expenses
totaling $5.1 million associated with a workforce
management program to align staffing levels with
expected demand. Without these expenses, segment
earnings would have been $43.2 million in 2000, a
decrease of 20% from 1999. This earnings decrease
was the result of lower sales and reduced segment
earnings margins.

• Cost of goods sold increased as a percent of sales.
Our cost of goods sold was relatively high in the
first half of 2000. Near the end of the second quarter,
we implemented our workforce management program
to align staffing levels with expected demand. Our
cost of goods sold in the last half of 2000, as a percent
of sales, is relatively close to the comparable percent
in 1999.

• Selling, general, and administrative expenses did not

decrease proportionally with sales. Our selling,
general, and administrative activities are relatively
independent of changes in sales volumes.

• Partially offsetting the items above, in 2000, we had
increased earnings resulting from our AESYS joint
venture with BAE SYSTEMS Controls, a $0.9
million reduction in acquisition-related accruals, and
$0.9 million in insurance proceeds in settlement of
certain matters from previous years.

Nonsegment Expenses and Gain

In thousands for the year
ended September 30,

2001

2000

1999

Interest expense
Interest income
Unallocated corporate expenses
Gain on sale of business
Restructuring expense

$ 7,554
(967)
18,753

$10,897
(770)
20,689
— (25,500)
—
—

$12,746
(827)
19,192
—
7,889

2001 Compared to 2000

Interest expense decreased in 2001 primarily because we
had lower levels of average outstanding debt in 2001 as
compared to 2000. Average interest rates were also lower.

Unallocated corporate expenses were 3% of consolidated
net sales in both 2001 and 2000.

The gain on the sale of business in 2000 relates to a sale on
May 31, 2000, of certain assets associated with our turbine
controls retrofit business for cash, with the buyer assuming
certain liabilities. The resulting gain was reported
separately in the statements of consolidated earnings.

The net sales and earnings of the turbine control retrofit
business were included as part of Industrial Controls and
could not be separately identified. However, we believe
annual sales of this business were approaching $50
million at the time of the sale.

2000 Compared to 1999

Interest expense decreased in 2000 because we had lower
levels of average outstanding debt in 2000 as compared
to 1999.

Unallocated corporate expenses were impacted by a gain
of $1.0 million on the sale of non-operating real estate in
1999. Excluding this gain, unallocated corporate
expenses were 3% of consolidated net sales in both 2000
and 1999.

The gain on the sale of business in 2000 relates to a sale on
May 31, 2000, of certain assets associated with our turbine
controls retrofit business for cash, with the buyer assuming
certain liabilities. The resulting gain was reported
separately in the statements of consolidated earnings.

We incurred restructuring expense in 1999 primarily in
connection with a change in the structure of our internal
Industrial Controls organization. We terminated 197
members, impacting all job functions to varying degrees.
Most of the terminations were in Fort Collins and
Loveland, Colorado.

17

Net Earnings

In thousands, except per share
amounts, for the year
ended September 30,

2001

2000

1999

Earnings before income taxes
Income taxes

$85,955
32,887

$74,092
27,116

$51,219
20,390

Net earnings

$53,068

$46,976

$30,829

Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share

$004.69
4.59

$004.17
4.15

$002.74
2.73

2001 Compared to 2000 and Outlook

Net earnings and earnings per share, both basic and
diluted, increased in 2001 over 2000. Income taxes were
provided at an effective rate on earnings before income
taxes of 38.3% in 2001 compared to 36.6% in 2000. The
most significant reason for the lower rate in 2000 was
related to the sale of our turbine control retrofit business,
which allowed us to use capital loss carryforwards for which
we previously provided valuation allowances. The spread
between basic and diluted earnings per share increased in
2001 as compared to 2000, primarily because of increases in
the price for our common stock during 2001.

Results for 2000 included a gain on sale of the turbine
control retrofit business, net of tax, of $17.1 million or
$1.52 per basic share and $1.51 per diluted share.
Without this gain, net earnings would have been $29.9
million or $2.65 per basic share and $2.64 per diluted
share for 2000. Our results in 2000 also included costs to
streamline operations after the sale, costs associated with
reductions in our workforce, and certain other costs not
indicative of normal operations which totaled, net of tax,
$6.7 million or $0.60 per basic share and $0.59 per
diluted share.

Outlook: During 2001, we have stated our goal of 15%
growth in net earnings, on average and before one-time
items, over the next three to four years. Our growth in
2001 exceeded this average expectation. However, recent
developments following the terrorist attacks on
September 11, 2001, suggest that we are unlikely to
achieve that level of annual growth for 2002. While we
have not been able to determine the full effects of those
tragic events, we currently expect net earnings in 2002 to
approximate those of 2001, within a range of plus or
minus 5%.

In addition, we also expect to adopt new accounting
standards in 2002 that impact accounting for goodwill
and other intangible assets, as more fully described near
the end of this management’s discussion and analysis.
Net earnings are expected to increase by approximately
$3.9 million in 2002 as a result of adopting these new
accounting standards. On a comparable basis, had these
new accounting standards been adopted at the beginning
of 2000, net earnings would have been $3.7 million
higher in 2001 and $3.6 million higher in 2000.

As we look forward, we have assumed for planning
purposes that any additional decrease in Aircraft Engine
Systems’ earnings in 2003 will be much smaller than in
2002. Consolidated net earnings could show some growth
in 2003, possibly even approaching our 15% goal,
depending on continued strength in our industrial markets.

2000 Compared to 1999

Net earnings and earnings per share, both basic and
diluted, increased in 2000 over 1999. Income taxes were
provided at an effective rate on earnings before income
taxes of 36.6% in 2000 compared to 39.8% in 1999. The
most significant reason for this decrease was related to
the sale of our turbine control retrofit business in 2000,
which allowed us to use capital loss carryforwards for
which we previously provided valuation allowances.

Results for 2000 included a gain on sale of the turbine
control retrofit business, net of tax, of $17.1 million or
$1.52 per basic share and $1.51 per diluted share.
Without this gain, net earnings would have been $29.9
million or $2.65 per basic share and $2.64 per diluted
share for 2000.

Our results in 2000 also included costs to streamline
operations after the sale, costs associated with reductions
in our workforce, and certain other costs not indicative of
normal operations which totaled, net of tax, $6.7 million
or $0.60 per basic share and $0.59 per diluted share. Our
results in 1999 included restructuring expense and gains
on the sale of real estate that netted to a reduction of
$3.0 million or $0.26 per basic share and $0.27 per
diluted share.

18

Financial Condition

2000 Compared to 1999

Our financial condition is discussed and analyzed by
segment for assets. We also separately discuss and
analyze other balance sheet measures and cash flows.
Together, this discussion and analysis will help you assess
our liquidity and capital resources, as well as understand
changes in our financial condition.

Assets

In thousands at September 30,

2001

2000

1999

Segment assets:

Industrial Controls
Aircraft Engine Systems

Nonsegment assets

$283,072
241,002
60,554

$214,935
260,712
58,076

$223,874
272,898
53,892

Total assets

$584,628

$533,723

$550,664

2001 Compared to 2000

Industrial Controls’ segment assets at September 30,
2001, were 32% higher than a year earlier. Business
acquisitions accounted for about half of the increase. The
remaining increase resulted from changes in accounts
receivable, inventories, and property, plant, and
equipment associated with the level of business activity.
Industrial Controls’ sales were 23% higher in the fourth
quarter 2001 than in the fourth quarter 2000 and we
anticipate higher sales volumes in upcoming quarters.
Intangibles decreased by the amount of amortization for
the year.

Aircraft Engine Systems’ segment assets at September
30, 2001, were 8% lower than a year earlier. This
decrease primarily resulted from negotiating accelerated
pay agreements with several of our customers and better
collection experience generally, reducing accounts
receivable. Also affecting receivables, Aircraft Engine
Systems’ sales were 3% lower in the fourth quarter 2001
than in the fourth quarter 2000 and we increased our
allowance for losses by $1.5 million following the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Other
contributing factors to the decrease in segment assets are
that intangibles decreased by the amount of amortization
for the year and capital expenditures were below
depreciation levels. Increases in inventories made in
anticipation of first quarter 2002 sales partially offset
these decreases.

Industrial Controls’ segment assets at September 30,
2000, were 4% lower than a year earlier. This decrease
resulted from the sale of assets related to our turbine
control retrofit business and other changes in accounts
receivable, inventories, and property, plant, and
equipment associated with the level of business activity.
Most significantly, receivables, inventories, and
equipment related to industrial nozzles increased. This
increase was a result of higher sales volumes in 2000 as
compared to 1999, as well as anticipated sales volumes in
2001. Intangibles decreased by the amount of
amortization for the year.

Aircraft Engine Systems’ segment assets at September
30, 2000, were 4% lower than a year earlier. Decreases in
accounts receivable, inventories, and property, plant, and
equipment primarily resulted from lower business activity
this year as compared to the prior year. Intangibles
decreased by the amount of amortization for the year.

Other Balance Sheet Measures

In thousands at September 30,

2001

2000

1999

Working capital (current

assets less current liabilities) $123,744

$100,836

$124,392

Long-term debt, less
current portion

Other liabilities
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ equity

77,000
51,042
—
318,862

74,500
50,142
—
275,624

139,000
46,620
—
241,992

2001 Compared to 2000

Increases in working capital were most significantly
attributed to increases in Industrial Controls’ inventories
in anticipation of higher sales volumes in upcoming
quarters and to reductions in short-term borrowings made
possible by the excess of operating cash flows over our
investing cash flows. In the first quarter of 2002, we
received proceeds from senior notes totaling $75 million
and used a portion of these proceeds to pay $60 million of
long-term debt, including $20 million that was classified
as a current liability. The senior notes have a ten-year
term, and the principal is required to be paid back in seven
equal annual payments beginning in 2006. Shareholders’
equity increased 16%, resulting primarily from 2001 net
earnings in excess of cash dividend payments.

We are currently involved in matters of litigation arising
from the normal course of business, including certain
environmental and product liability matters. Further
discussion of these matters is in Note P in the notes to
consolidated financial statements.

19

2001

2000

1999

2000 Compared to 1999

2000 Compared to 1999

Decreases in working capital were most significantly
attributable to the sale of assets related to our turbine
control retrofit business, and the assumption of certain
liabilities by the buyer, as we used the cash proceeds
from the sale to reduce debt. Strong operating and
investing cash flows in 2000 enabled us to reduce our
long-term debt by $64.5 million from the September 30,
1999, balance. Increases in other liabilities relate
primarily to changes in postemployment and retirement
obligations. Shareholders’ equity increased 14%, resulting
primarily from 2000 net earnings in excess of cash
dividend payments.

Cash Flows

In thousands for the year
ended September 30,

Net cash provided by
operating activities

Net cash provided by (used in)

investing activities

Net cash used in

financing activities

$86,990

$55,210

$59,932

(61,699)

15,736

(17,963)

(23,218)

(70,792)

(42,982)

2001 Compared to 2000 and Outlook

Net cash flows provided by operations increased by 58%
in 2001 over 2000. This improvement is predominantly
due to increased net earnings, exclusive of the pretax gain
from the sale of our turbine control retrofit business in
2000. For purposes of preparing the statement of
consolidated cash flows, the proceeds from the sale of the
retrofit business were not considered an operating
activity, but the associated income tax payments were.

Net cash flows for investing activities changed by $77.4
million in 2001 as compared to 2000. This change
resulted from Industrial Controls’ business acquisition
and divestiture activities. This year, we made payments
associated with two acquisitions totaling $31.2 million
and made payments associated with last year’s sale of our
turbine control retrofit business of $4.0 million. In 2000,
we received proceeds from the sale of our retrofit
business of $41.7 million.

Net cash flows used in financing activities decreased by
$47.6 million in 2001 from 2000. This decrease is
primarily associated with lower levels of debt reductions
due to two business acquisitions, despite higher levels of
operating cash flows. Last year, we also used proceeds
received from the sale of the turbine control retrofit
business to reduce debt.

20

Outlook: Future cash flows from operations and
available revolving lines of credit are expected to be
adequate to meet our cash requirements over the next
twelve months. However, it is possible business
acquisitions could be made in the future that would
require amendments to existing debt agreements and the
need to obtain additional financing.

We received new debt proceeds totaling $75 million
from 6.39% senior notes in the first quarter of 2002 that
increases our liquidity over the next several years. These
new senior notes have a ten-year term, and the principal
is payable in seven equal annual installments beginning
in 2006. A portion of the proceeds from the new
borrowings was used to pay $60 million of term notes
due in 2002 and 2003.

Net cash flows provided by operations decreased by 8%
in 2000 from 1999. For purposes of preparing the
statement of consolidated cash flows, the proceeds from
the sale of the turbine control retrofit business were not
considered an operating activity, but the associated
income tax payments were reflected as an operating
activity. Exclusive of income taxes related to the gain, net
cash flows provided by operating activities would have
increased by about 6% in 2000 over 1999. Most of this
improvement was related to a small reduction in total
operating assets and liabilities on relatively flat sales in
2000, compared to an increase in total operating assets
and liabilities on a sales increase in 1999.

Net cash flows for investing activities changed by $33.7
million in 2000 as compared to 1999. Most of this
change was the result of cash flows from the sale of our
turbine control retrofit business of $41.7 million.
Without this item, cash flows used in investing activities
in 2000 would have been $26.0 million, an increase of
$8.0 million over 1999. This increase was primarily
related to higher capital expenditures for Industrial
Controls because of increases in current and anticipated
sales, offset by the 1999 proceeds from the sale of non-
operating real estate in Stevens Point, Wisconsin and
land in The Netherlands.

Net cash flows used in financing activities increased by
$27.8 million in 2000 over 1999. This increase is
primarily associated with debt reductions made possible
from greater cash flows provided by operations and from
the sale of the turbine control retrofit business.

Other Matters

Market Risks

Our long-term debt is sensitive to changes in interest
rates. We monitor trends in interest rates as a basis for
determining whether to enter into fixed rate or variable
rate debt agreements, the duration of such agreements,
and whether to use hedging strategies. Our primary
objective is to minimize our long-term costs of
borrowing. At September 30, 2001, all long-term debt
was denominated in United States dollars and consisted
primarily of variable rate agreements associated with
LIBOR market rates, and there were no derivative
instruments associated with our debt. However, we used
interest rate swap agreements during 2001 to hedge our
exposure to variable cash flows of future interest
payments associated with a portion of senior notes
executed in October 2001. The interest rate swap
agreements were terminated and settled at the time the
senior notes were assigned a fixed rate in September
2001. Currently, all long-term debt is denominated in
United States dollars and consists of both fixed rate
agreements and variable rate agreements associated with
LIBOR market rates. In addition, we are currently using
interest rate swap agreements to hedge our exposure to
changes in the fair value of certain fixed rate long-term
debt. As measured at September 30, 2001, a hypothetical
1% immediate increase in interest rates would adversely
affect our 2002 net earnings and cash flows by
approximately $0.4 million and reduce the fair value of
our long-term debt by approximately $0.6 million. Last
year, a hypothetical 1% immediate increase in interest
rates would have adversely affected our 2001 net earnings
and cash flows by approximately $0.5 million and
reduced the fair value of our long-term debt by
approximately $0.1 million.

Assets, liabilities, and commitments that are to be settled
in cash and are denominated in foreign currencies for
transaction purposes are sensitive to changes in currency
exchange rates. We monitor trends in foreign currency
exchange rates and our exposure to changes in those rates
as a basis for determining whether to use hedging
strategies. Our primary exposures are to the European
Monetary Union euro and the Japanese yen. We do not
have any derivative instruments associated with foreign
currency exchange rates. A hypothetical 10% immediate

increase in the value of the United States dollar relative to
all other currencies, when applied to September 30, 2001,
balances, would adversely affect our expected 2002 net
earnings and cash flows by approximately $1.9 million.
Last year, a hypothetical 10% immediate increase in the
value of the United States dollar relative to all other
currencies would have adversely affected our expected
2001 net earnings and cash flows by $1.1 million.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
141, “Business Combinations” and No. 142, “Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets.” Statement No. 141
primarily impacts accounting for acquisitions initiated or
completed after June 30, 2001. However, Statement No.
141 also contains transition provisions that may result in
the reclassification of carrying values among existing
goodwill and other intangible assets. These transition
provisions require that we recognize an intangible asset
apart from goodwill whenever the asset arose from
contractual or other legal rights, or whenever it is capable
of being separated or divided from the acquired entity
and sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged,
either individually or in combination with a related
contract, asset, or liability. In addition, these provisions
prohibit the recognition of an assembled workforce as an
intangible asset apart from goodwill. Once adopted,
Statement No. 142 prohibits amortization of goodwill,
but requires transitional and annual impairment reviews
that may result in the recognition of losses, among other
requirements. We are required to adopt Statement No.
142 and the transition provisions of Statement No. 141,
on October 1, 2002, or on October 1, 2001, and have
elected the earlier date. Based on a preliminary
assessment of the effects of adoption, we expect to
recognize an increase in goodwill and decrease in other
intangibles of approximately $43.8 million on October 1,
2001, and a decrease in amortization expense of
approximately $6.3 million in 2002. Impairment losses
resulting from transitional impairment reviews, if any,
will be recognized as a cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle in the first quarter of 2002. We do
not expect such impairment losses, if any, to be material
to our financial condition.

21

St a t e m e n t s   o f   C o n s o l i d a t e d   E a r n i n g s
Woodward Governor Company and Subsidiaries

(In thousands except per share amounts)

2001

2000

1999

Year Ended September 30,

Net sales

Costs and expenses:

Cost of goods sold

Selling, general, and administrative expenses

Amortization of intangible assets

Restructuring expense

Interest expense

Interest income

Other expense—net

Gain on sale of business

 Total costs and expenses, net of gain

Earnings before income taxes

Income taxes

Net earnings

Basic earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share

Weighted-average number of basic shares outstanding

Weighted-average number of diluted shares outstanding

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

$678,791

$597,385

$596,904

511,027

67,437

7,055

—

7,554

(967)

730

—

592,836

85,955

32,887

$053,068

$0004.69

$0004.59

11,318

11,561

453,538

77,463

6,418

—

10,897

(770)

1,247

(25,500)

523,293

74,092

27,116

$046,976

$0004.17

$0004.15

11,263

11,318

437,121

79,043

6,769

7,889

12,746

(827)

2,944

—

545,685

51,219

20,390

$030,829

$0002.74

$0002.73

11,272

11,292

22

C o n s o l i d a t e d   B a l a n c e   S h e e t s
Woodward Governor Company and Subsidiaries

(In thousands except per share amounts)

Assets

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, less allowance for losses
of $4,720 for 2001 and $4,452 for 2000

Inventories
Deferred income taxes

Total current assets

Property, plant, and equipment, at cost:

Land
Buildings and improvements
Machinery and equipment
Construction in progress

Accumulated depreciation

Property, plant, and equipment—net
Intangibles—net
Other assets
Deferred income taxes

At September 30,

2001

2000

$010,542

$009,315

102,008
131,160
17,758

261,468

7,966
131,761
242,266
4,762

386,755
256,179

130,576
164,835
11,571
16,178

105,153
102,990
16,835

234,293

6,032
127,825
233,188
3,364

370,409
247,951

122,458
150,118
8,450
18,404

Total assets

$584,628

$533,723

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

Current liabilities:

Short-term borrowings
Current portion of long-term debt
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Income taxes payable

Total current liabilities

Long-term debt, less current portion
Other liabilities
Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders’ equity represented by:

Preferred stock, par value $.003 per share, authorized

10,000 shares, no shares issued

Common stock, par value $.00875 per share, authorized

50,000 shares, issued 12,160 shares

Additional paid-in capital
Unearned ESOP compensation
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
Retained earnings

Less treasury stock, at cost

Total shareholders’ equity

$005,561
22,500
91,180
18,483

137,724

77,000
51,042
—

—

106
13,440
(3,297)
1,046
327,276

338,571
19,709

318,862

$021,284
22,500
81,342
8,331

133,457

74,500
50,142
—

—

106
13,295
(5,308)
3,045
284,431

295,569
19,945

275,624

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$584,628

$533,723

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

23

St a t e m e n t s   o f   C o n s o l i d a t e d   S h a re h o l d e r s ’  E q u i t y
Woodward Governor Company and Subsidiaries

Unearned
ESOP
Compensation

Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Earnings

(In thousands except per share amounts)

Balance at September 30, 1998

Net earnings

Other comprehensive earnings—

Foreign currency translation adjustments

Total comprehensive earnings

Purchases of treasury stock

Sales of treasury stock

Issuance of stock to ESOP

ESOP compensation expense

Cash dividends—$.93
per common share

Tax benefit applicable to

ESOP dividend and stock options

Balance at September 30, 1999

Net earnings

Other comprehensive earnings—

Foreign currency translation adjustments

Total comprehensive earnings

Purchases of treasury stock

Sales of treasury stock

Issuance of stock to ESOP

ESOP compensation expense

Cash dividends—$.93
per common share

Tax benefit applicable to ESOP
dividend and stock options

Balance at September 30, 2000

Net earnings

Other comprehensive earnings—

Foreign currency translation adjustments,
 net of reclassification to earnings

Unrealized losses on derivatives

Total comprehensive earnings

Sales of treasury stock

ESOP compensation expense

Cash dividends—$.93
per common share

Tax benefit applicable to ESOP
dividend and stock options

Common
Stock

$106

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

106

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

106

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

$13,304

—

—

—

(3)

(1)

—

—

—

$ (9,723)

—

—

—

—

—

2,273

—

—

13,300

(7,450)

—

—

—

(12)

7

—

—

—

13,295

—

—

—

145

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

2,142

—

—

 (5,308)

—

—

—

—

2,011

—

—

Retained
Earnings

$226,736

30,829

—

—

—

—

—

(10,484)

339

247,420

46,976

—

—

—

—

—

(10,472)

507

284,431

53,068

 —

—

—

—

(10,526)

303

Treasury Stock

Shares

Amount

Total
Amount

863

—

—

46

(13)

(6)

—

—

—

890

—

—

64

(101)

(5)

—

—

—

848

—

—

—

(10)

—

—

—

$(20,170)

$220,102

—

—

(1,029)

313

151

—

—

—

30,829

(498)

30,331

(1,029)

310

150

2,273

(10,484)

339

(20,735)

241,992

—

—

(1,762)

2,423

129

—

—

—

46,976

(6,306)

40,670

(1,762)

2,411

136

2,142

(10,472)

507

(19,945)

275,624

—

53,068

—

—

236

—

—

—

(625)

(1,374)

51,069

381

2,011

(10,526)

303

$ 9,849

—

(498)

—

—

—

—

—

—

9,351

—

(6,306)

—

—

—

—

—

—

 3,045

—

(625)

(1,374)

—

—

—

—

Balance at September 30, 2001

$106

$13,440

$ (3,297)

$ 1,046

$327,276

838

$(19,709)

$318,862

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

24

St a t e m e n t s   o f   C o n s o l i d a t e d   C a s h   F l ow s
Woodward Governor Company and Subsidiaries

(In thousands)

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net
cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization
Net (gain) loss on sale of property, plant, and equipment
Gain on sale of business
Unrealized losses on derivatives
Deferred income taxes
ESOP compensation expense
Equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliate
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
 net of business acquisitions and sale:
Accounts receivable
Inventories
Current liabilities, other than short-term borrowings

and current portion of long-term debt

Other—net

Total adjustments

Net cash provided by operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities:
Payments for purchase of property, plant, and equipment
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment
Proceeds from sale of business – net of direct costs
Payments associated with sale of business
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash dividends paid
Proceeds from sales of treasury stock
Purchases of treasury stock
Net proceeds (payments) from borrowings under revolving lines
Proceeds from long-term debt
Payments of long-term debt
Tax benefit applicable to ESOP dividend and stock options

Net cash used in financing activities

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

Net change in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest expense paid
Income taxes paid

Noncash investing:
Liabilities assumed in business acquisitions (sale)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Year Ended September 30,

2001

2000

1999

$53,068

$46,976

$30,829

32,732
1,445
—
(1,374)
1,303
2,011
—

3,096
(25,126)

22,187
(2,352)

33,922

86,990

(26,903)
404
—
(3,985)
—
(31,215)

(61,699)

(10,526)
381
—
9,124
—
(22,500)
303

(23,218)

(846)

1,227
9,315

30,419
411
(25,500)
—
(9)
2,142
271

(3,997)
(3,746)

7,792
451

8,234

55,210

(27,416)
1,700
41,742
—
(290)
—

15,736

(10,472)
2,411
(1,762)
(39,826)
—
(21,650)
507

(70,792)

(1,288)

(1,134)
10,449

32,036
(2,848)
—
—
4,342
2,273
2,079

(8,015)
2,145

(7,228)
4,319

29,103

59,932

(22,789)
6,293
—
—
(1,405)
 (62)

(17,963)

(10,484)
310
(1,029)
(23,050)
75,000
(84,068)
339

(42,982)

(964)

(1,977)
12,426

$10,542

$09,315

$10,449

$08,058
$19,769

$11,854
$22,656

$12,675
$19,024

$0,0501

$ (1,430)

$01,994

25

N o t e s   t o   C o n s o l i d a t e d   F i n a n c i a l   St a t e m e n t s
(In thousands of dollars except per share amounts)

A. Significant accounting policies:

Principles of consolidation: The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the company and its
majority-owned subsidiaries. Transactions within and
between these companies are eliminated. Results of joint
ventures in which the company does not have a controlling
financial interest are included in the financial statements
using the equity method of accounting.

Use of estimates: Financial statements prepared in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
require the use of estimates and assumptions that affect
amounts reported. Actual results could differ materially from
our estimates.

Foreign currency translation: The assets and liabilities of
substantially all subsidiaries outside the United States are
translated at year-end rates of exchange and earnings and cash
flow statements are translated at weighted-average rates of
exchange. Translation adjustments are accumulated with
other comprehensive earnings as a separate component of
shareholders’ equity and are presented net of tax in the
statements of consolidated shareholders’ equity.

Revenue recognition: We recognize sales when delivery of
product has occurred or services have been rendered and there
is persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement, selling prices are
fixed or determinable, and collectibility from the customer is
reasonably assured.

Research and development costs: Expenditures related to
new product development are charged to expense when
incurred and totaled approximately $30,400 in 2001, $29,100
in 2000, and $24,600 in 1999.

Income taxes: Deferred income taxes are provided for the
temporary differences between the financial reporting basis
and the tax basis of the company’s assets and liabilities. We
provide for taxes that may be payable if undistributed earnings
of overseas subsidiaries were to be remitted to the United
States, except for those earnings that we consider to be
permanently reinvested.

Cash equivalents: Highly liquid investments purchased with
an original maturity of three months or less are considered to
be cash equivalents.

Inventories: Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or
market, with cost being determined on a first-in, first-out
basis.

Property, plant, and equipment: Property, plant, and
equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from 5 to 45 years
for buildings and improvements and 3 to 15 years for

26

machinery and equipment. Assets placed in service after
September 30, 1998, are depreciated using the straight-line
method and assets placed in service as of and prior to
September 30, 1998, are depreciated principally using
accelerated methods. Certain costs associated with
developing software to be used by us that were incurred after
September 30, 1999, are included with machinery and
equipment. Prior to September 30, 1999, software
development costs were expensed.

The September 30, 1999, change in accounting for software
development costs was made to adopt the provisions of
Statement of Position 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of
Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal
Use,” issued by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants in March 1998. Net earnings in 2000, the first
year following this change, were increased by approximately
$690 as a result of the change.

Intangibles: Intangibles are amortized over the periods
estimated to be benefited using the straight-line method. No
amortization period exceeds 30 years. We apply impairment
losses on long-lived assets first to related goodwill.
Impairment losses are recognized whenever expected
operating cash flows are less than the carrying values of
specific groups of property, plant, and equipment,
identifiable intangibles, and related goodwill.

Derivatives: We recognize derivatives, which are used to
hedge risks associated with interest rates, as assets or
liabilities at fair value. These derivatives are designated as
hedges of our exposure to changes in the fair value of long-
term debt or as hedges of our exposure to variable cash flows
of future interest payments. The gain or loss in the value of a
derivative designated as a fair value hedge is recognized in
earnings in the period of change together with an offsetting
loss or gain on long-term debt. The effective portion of a
gain or loss in the value of a derivative designated as cash
flow hedge is initially reported as a component of other
comprehensive earnings and subsequently reclassified into
earnings when the future interest payments affect earnings.
The ineffective portion of the gain or loss in the value of a
derivative designated as a cash flow hedge is reported in
earnings immediately.

Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications were made to the
2000 and 1999 financial statements to conform to the 2001
presentation.

New Accounting Standard: In June 2001, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations”
and No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”
Statement No. 141 primarily impacts accounting for
acquisitions initiated or completed after June 30, 2001.

However, Statement No. 141 also contains transition
provisions that may result in the reclassification of carrying
values among existing goodwill and other intangible assets.
These transition provisions require that we recognize an
intangible asset apart from goodwill whenever the asset arose
from contractual or other legal rights, or whenever it is
capable of being separated or divided from the acquired entity
and sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, either
individually or in combination with a related contract, asset,
or liability. In addition, these provisions prohibit the
recognition of an assembled workforce as an intangible asset
apart from goodwill. Once adopted, Statement No. 142
prohibits amortization of goodwill, but requires transitional
and annual impairment reviews that may result in the
recognition of losses, among other requirements. We are
required to adopt Statement No. 142 and the transition
provisions of Statement No. 141 on October 1, 2002, or
October 1, 2001, and have elected the earlier date. Based on a
preliminary assessment of the effects of adoption, we expect
to recognize an increase in goodwill and decrease in other
intangibles of approximately $43,800 on October 1, 2001,
and a decrease in amortization expense of approximately
$6,300 in 2002. Impairment losses resulting from transitional
impairment reviews, if any, will be recognized as a cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle in the first quarter
of 2002. We do not expect such impairment losses, if any, to
be material to our financial condition.

B. Business acquisitions and sale:
In November 2000, we acquired the stock of Hoeflich
Controls, Inc., a manufacturer of ignition systems, and
certain related assets, and in June 2001, we acquired certain
assets and assumed certain liabilities of the Bryce diesel fuel
injection business of Delphi Automotive Systems. These
acquisitions, which cost a total of $31,844, were accounted
for using the purchase method of accounting. The excess of
the purchase prices over the estimated fair values of tangible
and identified intangible net assets acquired are being
amortized over 15 years. Under terms of the Hoeflich
purchase agreement, we could be required to make an
additional payment of up to $1,200 in fiscal year 2004,
contingent upon attaining certain investment and sales
volumes, as defined by the agreement. Under terms of the
Delphi purchase agreement, we expect to assume benefit
obligations and receive plan assets in connection with a
defined benefit pension plan in 2002, the net amount of
which has not been determined. We intend to account for
any additional payment and the net accrued or prepaid
benefit cost as an adjustment to the purchase prices for the
acquisitions in the earliest periods amounts are determined. If
we had completed the acquisitions on October 1, 1999, net
sales and net earnings for 2001 and 2000 would not have
been materially different from amounts reported in the
statements of consolidated earnings.

At the time of our acquisition from Delphi, one of our
directors was an executive vice president with Delphi
Automotive Systems and served as president in a sector other
than the one containing diesel fuel injection businesses.

On May 31, 2000, we sold certain assets associated with our
turbine control retrofit business for cash, and the buyer
assumed certain liabilities. The resulting gain on the sale is
reported separately in the statements of consolidated
earnings. Net sales of the turbine control retrofit business are
believed to have represented less than 10% of consolidated
net sales in 2000 and 1999.

C. Restructuring expense:
We incurred expenses in connection with a change in the
structure of our internal Industrial Controls organization and
the consolidation of two of our facilities in 1999. These
expenses are reflected as restructuring expense in the
statements of consolidated earnings. The amount of
restructuring expense accrued at September 30, 1999, totaled
$475 and was related to member termination benefits. These
benefits were paid in 2000.

D. Income taxes:
Income taxes consisted of the following:

Year ended September 30,

2001

2000

1999

Current:

Federal
State
Foreign

Deferred

$23,884
3,064
6,603
(664)

$17,947
2,202
5,456
1,511

$10,550
1,384
3,929
4,527

$32,887

$27,116

$20,390

Deferred income taxes presented in the consolidated balance
sheets are related to the following:

At September 30,

Deferred tax assets:

Postretirement and

early retirement benefits
Foreign net operating loss

and state tax credits

Inventory
Other
Valuation allowance

Total deferred tax assets,

net of valuation allowance

Deferred tax liabilities:
Intangibles—net
Other

Total deferred tax liabilities

 Net deferred tax assets

2001

2000

$17,853

$18,793

9,796
6,105
24,961
(10,936)

9,998
8,357
20,047
(11,168)

47,779

46,027

(8,084)
(5,759)

(6,535)
(4,253)

(13,843)

(10,788)

$33,936

$35,239

27

N o t e s   t o   C o n s o l i d a t e d   F i n a n c i a l   St a t e m e n t s
(In thousands of dollars except per share amounts)

We have not provided for taxes on $13,300 of undistributed
foreign earnings that we consider permanently reinvested.
These earnings could become subject to income taxes if they
were remitted as dividends, were loaned to the company, or
if we should sell our stock in the subsidiaries. However, we
believe that foreign tax credits would largely offset any
income tax that might otherwise be due.

We recorded a valuation allowance to reflect the estimated
amount of deferred tax assets that may not be realized
primarily due to capital loss carryforwards and foreign net
operating loss carryforward limitations. Remaining deferred
tax assets are expected to be realized through future earnings.
The changes in the valuation allowance were as follows:

Year ended September 30,

Beginning balance
Foreign net operating loss carryforward
State net operating loss carryforward
Capital loss carryforward utilization

Ending balance

2001

2000

$(11,168) $(11,716)
(624)
(119)
1,291

25
177
30

$(10,936) $(11,168)

The reasons for the differences between our effective income
tax rate and the United States statutory federal income tax
rate were as follows:

Percent of pretax earnings,
year ended September 30,

Statutory rate
State income taxes, net
of federal tax benefit

Foreign loss effect
Foreign tax rate differences
Foreign sales benefits
Other items, net
Capital loss carryforward

 utilization

Effective rate

E. Earnings per share:

2001

35.0

2.2
1.5
0.1
(1.1)
0.6

—

38.3

2000

35.0

2.1
2.4
0.1
(1.6)
0.2

(1.6)

36.6

1999

35.0

2.5
2.3
2.1
(1.6)
(0.5)

—

39.8

Year ended September 30,

2001

2000

1999

Net earnings (A)

$53,068

$46,976

$30,829

The following stock options were outstanding during 2001,
2000, and 1999 but were not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices
were greater than the average market price of the common
shares during the respective periods:

Year ended September 30,

Options
Weighted-average exercise price

2001

4,884
$69.73

2000

1999

203,429
$32.22

220,375
$32.34

F. Inventories:

At September 30,

Raw materials
Component parts
Work in process
Finished goods

G. Intangibles—net:

At September 30,

Goodwill
Customer relationships
Other

2001

2000

$004,638
74,595
33,472
18,455

$003,056
58,559
26,922
14,453

$131,160

$102,990

2001

2000

$095,704
39,402
29,729

$091,253
40,879
17,986

$164,835

$150,118

Intangibles are shown net of accumulated amortization of
$23,967 in 2001 and $16,848 in 2000.

H. Short-term borrowings:
Short-term borrowings reflect borrowings under certain
bank lines of credit. The total amount available under these
lines of credit, including outstanding borrowings, totaled
$43,483 at September 30, 2001, and $46,667 at September
30, 2000. Interest on borrowings under the lines of credit is
based on various short-term rates. Several of the lines require
compensating balances or commitment fees. The lines,
generally reviewed annually for renewal, are subject to the
usual terms and conditions applied by the banks. The
weighted-average interest rate for outstanding borrowings
was 4.8% at September 30, 2001, 6.5% at September 30,
2000, and 4.4% at September 30, 1999.

Determination of shares,
 in thousands:

Weighted-average shares

of common stock
outstanding (B)
Assumed exercise of

stock options

Weighted-average shares

of common stock outstanding
assuming dilution,
in thousands (C)

11,318

11,263

11,272

At September 30,

I. Long-term debt:

243

55

20

Term note
Borrowings under revolving line

of credit facility

ESOP debt guarantee—8.01%

11,561

11,318

11,292

Less current portion

Basic earnings per share (A/B)

$004.69

$004.17

$002.74

Diluted earnings per share (A/C) $004.59

$004.15

$002.73

28

2001

2000

$60,000

$80,000

35,000
4,500

99,500
22,500

10,000
7,000

97,000
22,500

$77,000

$74,500

In 1998, we entered into uncollateralized financing
arrangements with a syndicate of U.S. banks, including a
$100,000 term note and a revolving line of credit facility up to
a maximum amount of $150,000. The interest rate on
borrowings under the term note varies with LIBOR and was
3.16% at September 30, 2001. The revolving line of credit
facility carries a facility fee of 0.25%, with outstanding
borrowings due five years from the inception of the
agreement. The interest rate on borrowings under the
revolving line of credit facility varies with LIBOR, the money
market rate, or the prime rate, and the weighted-average rate
was 3.92% at September 30, 2001.

In June 1992, the company’s Member Investment and Stock
Ownership Plan (a qualified employee stock ownership plan)
borrowed $25,000 for a term of eleven years and used the
proceeds to buy 1,027,224 shares of common stock from the
company. We guaranteed the payment of the loan and agreed
to make future contributions to the plan sufficient to repay
the loan. Accordingly, the original amount of the loan was
recorded as long-term debt and unearned ESOP
compensation. The consolidated balance sheets reflect the
outstanding balance of the loan in long-term debt and the
remaining unearned ESOP compensation as a component of
shareholders’ equity. Unearned ESOP compensation has
been reduced using the shares allocated method for shares
allocated to plan participants. The unallocated shares were
135,472 at September 30, 2001; 218,076 at September 30,
2000; and 306,088 at September 30, 1999.

At September 30, 2001, borrowings under the revolving line
of credit facility were classified as long-term as we have both
the intent and ability, through the company’s revolving line of
credit facility, to refinance this amount on a long-term basis.

Exclusive of the revolving line of credit facility, required
future principal payments of long-term debt at September 30,
2001, are $22,500 in 2002, and $42,000 in 2003. However,
we received proceeds from 6.39% senior notes totaling
$75,000 in October 2001 and used a portion of these
proceeds to pay $20,000 of long-term debt that was due in
2002 and $40,000 that was due in 2003. The 6.39% senior
notes have a ten-year term, and the principal is required to be
paid back in seven equal annual payments beginning in 2006.

In 2001, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to
hedge our exposure to variable cash flows of future interest
payments associated with a portion of the 6.39% senior notes.
Settlement payments made upon termination of these swap
agreements at the time the senior notes were assigned a fixed
rate were recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive earnings. Amounts will be reclassified to net
earnings as interest expense is incurred on the related debt.
We expect to reclassify approximately $150 from accumulated
other comprehensive earnings to net earnings in 2002.

Provisions of the debt agreements include covenants
customary to such agreements that require us to maintain
specified minimum or maximum financial measures and
place limitations on various investing and financing
activities. The agreements also permit the lenders to
accelerate repayment requirements in the event of a material
adverse event. Our most restrictive covenants require us to
maintain a minimum consolidated net worth and a
maximum consolidated debt to consolidated operating cash
flow ratio, as defined in the agreements. At September 30,
2001, we had the ability to pay dividends and purchase the
company’s common stock up to $87,837.

J. Accounts payable and accrued expenses:

At September 30,

Accounts payable
Salaries and other member benefits
Deferred compensation
Taxes, other than on income
Other items—net

2001

2000

$27,613
31,872
7,481
4,586
19,629

$25,065
23,580
4,573
5,501
22,623

$91,181

$81,342

Certain key management members may elect to defer the
payment of a portion of their compensation to future
periods. These deferrals are recorded as deferred
compensation, and individual member balances are increased
or decreased as if they were held in specified investments,
including common stock of the company. Deferred
compensation balances are payable upon the retirement or
other termination of a participating member, or as otherwise
specified by plan documents.

K. Retirement benefits:
We provide various benefits to eligible members of our
company, including retirement healthcare benefits, pension
benefits, and contributions to various defined contribution
plans.

Currently, approximately 57% of our members may become
eligible for retirement healthcare benefits, generally after
reaching age 55 with 10 years of service or after reaching age
65. We pay 80% to 100% of eligible healthcare expenses of
retired members, their dependents and survivors, which are
not paid by Medicare, up to maximum amounts established
under the various plans. Plan participants share in the cost of
these benefits in varying amounts based on years of service,
and we have the right to modify or terminate the plans. The
plans are not funded, and there are no plan assets. Changes
in the benefit obligations, the unfunded status of the plans,
and the amount of accrued benefit costs for our retirement
healthcare plans were as follows:

29

N o t e s   t o   C o n s o l i d a t e d   F i n a n c i a l   St a t e m e n t s
(In thousands of dollars except per share amounts)

At or for the year ended September 30,

2001

2000

Change in benefit obligation:

Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Contributions by plan participants
Net actuarial losses
Benefits paid
Curtailment gain related

to sale of business

Other

Benefit obligation at end of year

and unfunded status

Unrecognized net actuarial gains (losses)

Total accrued benefit cost
Portion of accrued benefit cost
included in accrued expenses

Portion of accrued benefit cost
included in other liabilities

 $39,631
894
3,019
3,082
9,931
(6,561)

$36,819
1,051
2,758
2,394
411
(4,838)

—
—

(964)
2,000

49,996
(2,769)

47,227

39,631
7,231

46,862

2,000

2,000

$45,227

$44,862

The components of the net periodic benefit cost associated
with the retirement healthcare plans were as follows:

Year ended September 30,

2001

2000

Service cost
Interest cost
Amortization of unrecognized

net gain

Curtailment gain related
to sale of business

 $,0894
3,019

 $1,051
2,758

(69)

(142)

—

(964)

1999

$1,103
2,587

 —

—

Net periodic benefit cost

$3,844

$2,703

$3,690

In accounting for the retirement healthcare plans, we
assumed the weighted-average discount rate was 7.25% in
2001, 7.75% in 2000, and 7.50% in 1999. We also assumed
net healthcare cost trend rates primarily of 10.00% in 2002,
decreasing gradually to 4.50% in 2007, and remaining at
4.50% thereafter. A 1.00% change in assumed healthcare
cost trend rates would have had the following effects on
amounts reported in 2001:

Effect on total of service and
interest cost components
Effect on benefits obligation

at end of year

1.00%
Increase Decrease

1.00%

$ 752

$ (580)

8,426

(6,659)

Approximately 13% of our members are currently covered
under defined benefit pension plans. Benefits paid under
these plans vary primarily due to members’ length of service
and compensation. However, effective September 30, 1999,
the years of service factor was frozen for participants in one
of our pension plans. Changes in benefit obligations and
plan assets, the funded status, and the amount of accrued
benefit costs for our pension plans were as follows:

At or for the year ended September 30,

2001

2000

Change in benefit obligations:

Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Net actuarial losses (gains)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
Benefits paid

$29,293
698
1,365
371
(1,568)
(366)

$28,461
781
1,352
(843)
(165)
(293)

Benefit obligation at end of year

29,793

29,293

Change in plan assets:

Fair value of assets at beginning of year
Actual return on plan assets
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
Contributions by the company
Benefits paid

27,602
(4,113)
(1,525)
613
(366)

24,369
3,018
(174)
682
(293)

Fair value of assets at end of year

 22,211

 27,602

Funded status
Unamortized prior service cost
Unrecognized net losses (gains)
Unamortized transition obligation

Net accrued benefit cost
Portion of net accrued benefit
cost included in other assets

Portion of net accrued benefit

(7,583)
(103)
3,727
 798

(3,161)

(1,691)
(122)
(2,112)
 980

(2,945)

—

134

cost included in other liabilities

$ (3,161)

$ (3,079)

The components of the net periodic benefit cost associated
with the pension plans were as follows:

Year ended September 30,

2001

2000

1999

Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of prior service cost
Recognized net gains (losses)
Amortization of transition obligation

$,0698
1,365
(1,306)
(8)
 (23)
89

$,0781
1,352
(1,230)
(9)
 9
100

$1,490
1,575
(1,529)
(8)
—
90

Net periodic pension cost

$,0815

$1,003

$1,618

30

The following weighted-average assumptions,
reflecting rates appropriate in the United States and Japan,
were used in accounting for pension plans:

Year ended September 30,

Discount rate
Rate of compensation increase
Expected long-term rate of
return on plan assets

2001

4.6%
4.2%

5.0%

2000

4.8%
4.2%

4.9%

1999

5.3%
4.3%

5.2%

Approximately 78% of our members are currently eligible for
one or more defined contribution plans. Contributions to
these plans are discretionary. However, we do have a
qualified employee stock ownership plan that has
outstanding borrowings that have been guaranteed by the
company. We have agreed to make future contributions to
the plan sufficient to repay the loan. The proceeds of the
borrowing were used by the plan to purchase common stock
from the company, the shares of which are allocated to plan
participants as contributions are made to the plan. Amounts
charged to expense for defined contribution plans totaled
$11,239 in 2001, $11,062 in 2000, and $10,551 in 1999.

L. Stock option plan:
We have a stock option plan covering key management
members and directors of the company. Options granted
under the plan generally have a term of 10 years and vest
evenly at the end of each year over four years from the date
of grant. There were 1,308,663 shares of common stock
authorized for issuance under the plan at September 30,
2001. We account for options in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees,” and therefore we do not
recognize compensation expense in association with options
granted at or above the market price of our common stock at
the date of grant. As required by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-
Based Compensation,” the following table presents pro
forma net earnings and per share information that has been
prepared as if compensation for these options was ecognized:

Year ended September 30,

2001

2000

1999

Net earnings
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share

$52,420
4.63
4.53

$46,850
4.16
4.14

$30,298
2.69
2.68

The determination of compensation expense for this pro
forma information was based upon the estimated fair value
of the options granted on the date of their grant. The
weighted-average estimated fair value of options granted was
$16.05 in 2001, $6.82 in 2000, and $4.27 in 1999. These
estimates were determined using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model and the following weighted-average
assumptions by grant year:

Year ended September 30,

Risk-free interest rate
Expected life
Expected volatility
Expected dividend yield

2001

5.8%
7 years
30.0%
1.7%

2000

6.9%
7 years
26.4%
3.7%

1999

4.9%
7 years
23.0%
4.2%

Changes in outstanding stock options were as follows:

Balance at September 30, 1998

Options granted
Options exercised
Options canceled

Balance at September 30, 1999

Options granted
Options exercised
Options canceled

Balance at September 30, 2000

Options granted
Options exercised
Options canceled

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
 Price

$26.88
22.00
22.00
32.18

25.33
24.75
23.38
30.46

25.06
44.08
28.68
29.77

Number

452,681
200,000
(4,000)
(7,266)

641,415
145,100
(100,990)
(55,353)

630,172
162,979
(5,533)
(6,800)

Balance at September 30, 2001

780,818

$28.96

Stock options outstanding at September 30, 2001, consisted
of the following:

Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable

Exercise
Price
Range

$16.625-$24.750
$30.594-$41.813
$69.220-$73.700

Average
Exercise
Price

$22.44
$36.69
$70.25

Number

454,150
313,689
012,979

780,818

$28.96

Weighted- Weighted-

Average
Remaining
Life In Years Number Price

Weighted-
Average
Exercise

6.3
7.6
9.6

6.8

363,925 $21.87
164,139 $32.14
012,979 $70.25

541,043 $26.15

There were 501,972 stock options exercisable at September
30, 2000, and 616,465 at September 30, 1999.

31

N o t e s   t o   C o n s o l i d a t e d   F i n a n c i a l   St a t e m e n t s
(In thousands of dollars except per share amounts)

P. Contingencies:
We are currently involved in matters of litigation arising
from the normal course of business, including certain
environmental and product liability matters. We have
accruals of approximately $1,000 at September 30, 2001, and
$460 at September 30, 2000, related to such matters. These
accruals are based on our current estimate of the most likely
amount of losses that we believe will be incurred. These
amounts have been included in accounts payable and accrued
expenses.

We have been designated a “de minimis potentially
responsible party” with respect to the cost of investigation
and environmental cleanup of certain third-party sites. Our
current accrual for these matters is based on costs incurred to
date that we have been allocated and our estimate of the
most likely future investigation and cleanup costs. There is,
as in the case of most environmental litigation, the
possibility that under joint and several liability we could be
required to pay more than our allocated share of costs.

It is our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, that
additional liabilities, if any, resulting from these matters are
not expected to have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, although such matters could have a
material effect on our quarterly or annual operating results
and cash flows when resolved in a future period.

Q. Financial instruments:
The estimated fair values of our financial instruments were
as follows:

At September 30,

2001

2000

Cash and cash equivalents
Short-term borrowings
Long-term debt, including current portion

$10,542
(5,561)
(99,637)

$09,315
(21,284)
(96,985)

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, short-term
borrowings, and long-term debt at variable interest rates
were assumed to be equal to their carrying amounts. Cash
and cash equivalents have short-term maturities, short-term
borrowings have short-term maturities and market interest
rates, and long-term debt at variable interest rates is repriced
frequently at market rates of interest. The fair value of long-
term debt at fixed interest rates was estimated based on a
model that discounted future principal and interest payments
at interest rates available to the company at the end of the
year for similar debt of the same maturity.

M. Shareholder rights plan:
We have a shareholder rights plan to protect shareholders
against unsolicited attempts to acquire control of the
company that do not offer what the Board of Directors
believes to be an adequate price to all shareholders. In
connection with this plan, a dividend of one preferred stock
purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock
was paid to shareholders in February 1996. Each right
entitles its holder to purchase from the company one-four
hundredth of a share of Series A Preferred Stock, par value
$.003 per share, at a price of $75.00 (subject to adjustment,
and restated for the January 1997 stock split). The rights
may not be exercised or transferred apart from the
company’s common stock until 10 days after it is announced
that a person or group has acquired 15% or more of the
outstanding common stock or 15 business days after it is
announced that there is an offer (or an intent to make an
offer) by a person or group to acquire 15% or more of the
outstanding common stock. The Board of Directors may
extend the 15 business day period referred to above and may
redeem the rights in whole (but not in part) at a redemption
price of $.003 per right at any time prior to an acquisition of
15% or more of the outstanding common stock by a person
or group. The rights expire on January 17, 2006.

N. Accumulated other comprehensive earnings:

At or for the year ended September 30,

2001

2000

Accumulated foreign currency

 translation adjustments:

Balance at beginning of year
Translation adjustments
Reclassification adjustment for

$ 3,045
358

$ 9,351
(6,306)

substantial liquidation of subsidiary

500

—

Taxes associated with translation

adjustments

Balance at end of year

Accumulated unrealized derivative losses:

Balance at beginning of year
Unrealized losses on derivatives
Taxes associated with unrealized losses
Balance at end of year

Accumulated other comprehensive

 earnings

(1,483)
2,420

—
3,045

—
(2,217)
843
 (1,374)

—
—
—
 —

$ 1,046

$ 3,045

O. Leases:
We have entered into leases for certain facilities. Future
minimum rental commitments under these operating leases
are: $1,497 in 2002, $1,597 in 2003, $944 in 2004, $888 in
2005, and $770 in 2006. Rent expense for facilities was
approximately $3,051 in 2001, $2,878 in 2000, and $2,634
in 1999.

32

At September 30,

2001

2000

1999

Total segment assets
Unallocated corporate property,
plant, and equipment—net

Other unallocated assets

$524,074

$475,647

$496,772

4,505
56,049

5,072
53,004

3,926
49,966

Consolidated total assets

 $584,628

$533,723

$550,664

Differences between total depreciation and amortization
and capital expenditures of our segments and the
corresponding consolidated amounts reported in the
statements of consolidated cash flows are due to unallocated
corporate amounts.

One customer accounted for more than 10% of consolidated
net sales, impacting both the Aircraft Engine Systems and
Industrial Controls segments, and totaled approximately
$219,000 in 2001, $147,000 in 2000, and $130,000 in 1999.

External net sales by geographical area, as determined by the
location of the customer invoiced, were as follows:

Year ended September 30,

2001

2000

1999

United States
Other countries

 $429,020
249,771

$372,773
224,612

$350,999
245,905

 $678,791

$597,385

$596,904

Property, plant, and equipment—net by geographical area,
as determined by the physical location of the assets, were
as follows:

At September 30,

United States
Other countries

2001

2000

1999

 $105,945
24,631

$105,725
16,733

$106,325
17,797

 $130,576

$122,458

$124,122

R. Segment information:
Our operations are organized based on the nature of
products and related services provided and consist of two
operating segments—Industrial Controls and Aircraft
Engine Systems. Industrial Controls provides energy control
systems and components primarily to OEMs of industrial
engines, turbines, and other power equipment. Aircraft
Engine Systems provides energy control systems and
components primarily to OEMs of aircraft engines.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as
those described in Note A. Intersegment sales and transfers
are made at established intersegment selling prices generally
intended to approximate selling prices to unrelated parties.
Our determination of segment earnings does not reflect
restructuring expense, gain on sale of business, and
allocations of corporate expenses, and is before interest
expense, interest income, and income taxes. Segment assets
consist of accounts receivable, inventories, property, plant,
and equipment—net, and intangible assets—net.
Summarized financial information for our segments follows:

At or for the year ended September 30,

2001

2000

1999

Industrial Controls:
External net sales
Intersegment sales
Segment earnings
Segment assets
Depreciation and amortization
Capital expenditures

$384,145
808
57,710
283,072
14,850
15,582

Aircraft Engine Systems:
External net sales
Intersegment sales
Segment earnings
Segment assets
Depreciation and amortization
Capital expenditures

$294,646
2,919
53,585
241,002
15,704
9,711

$330,962
700
41,258
214,935
13,322
14,631

$266,423
2,010
38,150
260,712
15,318
10,071

$310,038
679
35,959
223,874
14,670
9,576

$286,866
1,853
54,260
272,898
15,708
11,183

The differences between the total of segment amounts and
the consolidated financial statements were as follows:

Year ended September 30,

2001

2000

1999

Total segment net sales and

intersegment sales

 $682,518  $600,095

$599,436

Elimination of intersegment

sales

(3,727)

(2,710)

(2,532)

Consolidated net sales

 $678,791  $597,385

$596,904

Total segment earnings
Unallocated corporate expenses
Restructuring expense

and gain on sale of business

Interest expense and income

Consolidated earnings before

 $111,295
(18,753)

$079,408
(20,689)

$090,219
(19,192)

—
(6,587)

25,500
(10,127)

(7,889)
(11,919)

income taxes

$085,955  $074,092

$051,219

33

M a n a g e m e n t ’s   Re s p o n s i b i l i t y   f o r   F i n a n c i a l   St a t e m e n t s

Management is responsible for the accompanying financial statements and believes that the financial statements accurately
and consistently present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the company in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.

Management makes what it believes to be reasonable and prudent judgments and estimates where necessary, and has a
system of internal accounting controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that its financial records are accurate, assets
are safeguarded, and transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorizations. Self-monitoring of the
internal accounting control system, along with selective testing, is a part of our control environment. Corrective actions are
taken whenever deficiencies in our internal accounting control system are identified.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the company’s independent accountants, audit the company’s financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Their report on these financial statements is presented below.

The audit committee of the company’s Board of Directors, which consists of directors who are not officers or employees of
the company, meets with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to review and discuss the audited financial
statements, along with other matters.

John A. Halbrook
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer

Stephen P. Carter
Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Re p o r t   o f   I n d e p e n d e n t   A c c o u n t a n t s

To Board of Directors and Shareholders
Woodward Governor Company

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related statements of consolidated earnings,
shareholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Woodward Governor
Company and its subsidiaries at September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois
October 31, 2001

34

Se l e c t e d   Q u a r t e r l y   F i n a n c i a l   D a t a
(Unaudited)

(In thousands except per share data)

First

Second

Third

Fourth

First

Second

Third

Fourth

2001 Fiscal Quarters

2000 Fiscal Quarters

Net sales
Gross profit*
Net earnings
Net earnings per basic share
Net earnings per diluted share
Cash dividends per share

Common stock price per share
 High
 Low
 Close

$150,730
37,329
 10,908
0.96
 0.95
 0.2325

$170,176
41,591
12,672
 1.12
 1.10
 0.2325

$182,508 $175,377
44,038
15,760
1.39
1.36
0.2325

44,806
13,728
1.21
1.18
0.2325

$133,592
33,939
 6,007
0.53
 0.53
 0.2325

$149,085
32,745
5,372
 0.48
 0.48
 0.2325

$155,496 $159,212
38,384
 9,432
0.84
0.83
 0.2325

38,779
26,165 **
2.33 **
2.32 **

 0.2325

$0049.00
35.75
44.75

$0057.73
40.00
51.38

$0091.00 $0086.85
42.06
48.45

49.00
84.35

$0028.50
24.50
27.50

$0027.38
21.88
23.00

$0028.50 $0045.00
26.88
44.56

21.75
28.31

*Gross profit represents net sales less cost of goods sold as reported in our statements of consolidated earnings.

** We sold our turbine retrofit business for a gain, net of tax, of $17,203 in the third quarter 2000. Without this gain, our net earnings in the third
quarter 2000 would have been $8,962 or $0.80 per basic share and $0.79 per diluted share.

C a u t i o n a r y   St a t e m e n t

This annual report contains forward-looking statements, including financial projections, our plans and objectives for future
operations, expectations of future economic performance, and various other assumptions relating to the future. While such
statements reflect our current expectations, all such statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ
materially from projections or any other forward-looking statement, and we have no obligation to update our forward-
looking statements. Important factors that could cause results to differ materially from those projected or otherwise stated
include the following: unanticipated global or regional economic developments and business cycle changes resulting from
the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States (and subsequent actions in response to those attacks),
particularly as those consequences impact the sales and operations of Aircraft Engine Systems; other unanticipated global
or regional economic developments, particularly in, but not limited to, Asia, Europe, and the United States; other changes
in business cycles of particular industries served by our company, primarily OEMs of aircraft engines, both commercial and
military, and industrial engines, turbines, and other power equipment, particularly in power generation, transportation, and
process industries markets; fluctuations in currency exchange rates of U.S. and foreign countries, primarily those located in
Europe and Asia; fluctuations in interest rates, primarily LIBOR, which affect the cost of borrowings; timing and
acceptance of new products and product enhancements, including, but not limited to, products that integrate energy control
technologies of recently-acquired companies; competitor actions that adversely impact our orders or pricing, including, but
not limited to, aftermarket sales; adverse changes in the business acquisition climate; effects of any business acquisitions or
divestitures; changes in U.S. and other country laws and regulations involving acquisitions, the environment, and taxes;
relative success of quality and productivity initiatives, such as the Six Sigma initiative and supplier designation levels with
key customers; unanticipated problems associated with implementing our e-Business strategy; and unusual or extraordinary
events or developments involving litigation or other potential liabilities.

35

S u m m a r y   o f   O p e ra t i o n s / E l e ve n - Ye a r   Re c o r d
(In thousands of dollars except per share amounts)

Net Sales, Net Earnings, and Dividends for the year ended September 30,

Net Earnings (Loss)

Year
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991

Net Sales
$678,791
597,385
596,904
490,476
442,216
417,290
379,736
333,207
331,156
374,173
361,924

Amount
$53,068

46,976***
30,829
21,592
18,140
22,178
11,936
(3,273)
13,389**
20,212
24,293

Financial Position at September 30,

Year
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991

Working
Capital
$123,744
100,836
124,392
119,506
124,827
121,103
116,364
113,751
107,809
103,818
105,213

Total
Assets
$584,628
533,723
550,664
563,435
348,110
348,798
349,599
323,318
332,461
331,653
306,534

Per
Basic
Share
$4.69

4.17***
2.74
 1.90
 1.58
1.92
1.03
(0.28)
1.13**
1.81
2.22

Long-term
Debt
$ 77,000
 74,500
139,000
175,685
17,717
22,696
27,796
32,665
36,246
40,135
17,300

Per
Diluted
Share
$4.59

4.15***
2.73
 1.90
1.57
1.92
1.03
(0.28)
1.13**
1.81
2.22

Total
Debt
$105,061
118,284
180,953
213,645
30,604
42,868
62,960
61,591
58,258
64,375
50,132

% of Beginning
Shareholders’
Equity
19.3
19.4
14.0
10.3
8.7
11.2
6.2
(1.6)
6.1
9.7
12.5

Cash
Dividends
Per Share
$ 0.93
0.93
0.93
0.93
0.93
0.93
0.93
0.93
0.93
0.92
0.92

% of Sales

7.8
7.9
5.2
4.4
4.1
5.3
3.1
(1.0)
4.0
5.4
6.7

Shareholders’ Equity

Amount
$318,862
275,624
241,992
220,102
210,614
207,995
197,903
193,846
206,222
219,690
208,564

Per Diluted
Share
$27.58
24.35
21.43
19.34
18.27
18.01
17.05
 16.57
 17.36
 18.48
19.02

% of
Debt to
Debt-Equity
24.8
30.0
42.8
49.3
12.7
17.1
24.1
24.1
22.0
22.7
19.4

Other Selected Data for the year ended September 30,

at September 30,

Depreciation Amortization

Year
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991

Expense
$25,677
24,001
25,267
23,715
21,854
22,786
23,334
26,114
24,837
22,241
18,236

Expense
$7,055
6,418
6,769
2,927
983
608
452
500
419
392
235

EBITDA*
$125,274

114,638 ***
95,174
67,699
55,884
61,075
47,239
24,652
50,314 **
57,652
58,962

Effective
Income
Tax Rate
(%)
38.3
36.6
39.8
40.5
38.6
37.0
40.9
37.0
42.0
38.7
36.1

Capital
Expenditures
$26,903
27,416
22,789
20,862
21,152
21,163
18,988
16,515
18,335
52,684
33,075

Weighted-
Average

Registered
Shareholder

Diluted Shares Worker
Outstanding Members Members
11,561,000
11,318,000
11,292,000
11,379,000
11,525,000
11,570,000
11,623,000
11,765,000
11,889,000
11,179,000
10,967,000

1,652
1,742
1,866
1,907
1,994
2,029
2,179
2,256
2,301
2,301
2,303

3,709
3,302
3,791
3,994
3,246
3,211
3,071
3,439
3,264
3,632
3,953

* EBITDA represents earnings before interest (expense and income), income taxes, depreciation, and amortization.

** Net earnings and EBITDA for 1993 are before cumulative effect of accounting changes.

*** Net earnings and EBITDA for 2000 include a gain from the sale of business of $25,500 before income taxes and $17,082 after income taxes, or
$1.52 per basic share and $1.51 per diluted share.

36

Board of Directors

J. Grant Beadle
Retired Chairman and 
Chief Executive Officer
Union Special Corporation

Vern H. Cassens
Retired Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 
Woodward Governor Company

Paul Donovan
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Wisconsin Energy Corporation

Lawrence E. Gloyd
Chairman Emeritus and Retired
Chairman and 
Chief Executive Officer
CLARCOR, Inc.

John A. Halbrook
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer 
Woodward Governor Company

Thomas W. Heenan
Retired Partner 
Law Firm of 
Chapman and Cutler 

J. Peter Jeffrey
Retired Vice President 
Development
Father Flanagan’s Boys’ Home

Michael H. Joyce 
President and Chief 
Operating Officer
Twin Disc, Incorporated

Rodney O'Neal
Executive Vice President
Delphi Automotive Systems 
and President
Safety, Thermal, and Electrical
Architecture Sector

Lou L. Pai
Private Investor

Michael T. Yonker
Retired President and 
Chief Executive Officer
Portec, Inc.

37

Annual Meeting
January 23, 2002, at 10:00 A.M.
Woodward Auditorium
5001 North Second Street
Rockford, IL 

Annual Report on Form 10-K
Shareholders may obtain, without charge, a 
single copy of Woodward’s 2001 annual report
on Securities and Exchange Commission Form
10-K upon written request to the Corporate 
Secretary, Woodward Governor Company,
Rockford, IL.

Stock Exchange
Nasdaq National Market
Ticker Symbol: WGOV

Officers

John A. Halbrook
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer

Stephen P. Carter 
Vice President
Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer

Ronald E. Fulkrod
Vice President

Thomas A. Gendron
Vice President
General Manager,
Industrial Controls

C. Phillip Turner
Vice President
General Manager,
Aircraft Engine Systems

Carol J. Manning
Corporate Secretary

Investor Information

Woodward Governor Company
Corporate Headquarters
5001 North Second Street
P.O. Box 7001
Rockford, IL  61125-7001  USA
www.woodward.com

Transfer Agent and Registrar
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
New York, NY
1-800-937-5449

Correspondence and transfer requests 
should be sent to the following:
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
Shareholder Services
59 Maiden Lane
New York, NY  10038  USA

Shareholder Account Assistance
Shareholders who wish to change the address
or ownership of stock, report lost certificates,
eliminate duplicate mailings or for other
account registration procedures and 
assistance should contact the Transfer Agent 
at the address or phone number above.

Dividend Reinvestment Plan and Direct
Deposit of Dividends
Woodward offers shareholders of record a 
convenient Dividend Reinvestment Plan
whereby dividends can be automatically 
reinvested in Woodward’s common stock. 
The plan also provides for a voluntary 
quarterly cash payment option for the pur-
chase of additional stock.

For further information and an authorization
form, contact the Transfer Agent at the
address or phone number above.

An Equal Opportunity Employer
It is Woodward’s policy to take affirmative action to provide equal employment 
opportunity to all members and applicants for employment without regard 
to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, veteran’s or handicapped
status, and to base all employment decisions so as to further this principle of
equal employment opportunity.

38